Loading...
CONTRACT 5757 Reimbursement Agreement CLOSEDAgreement No. 5757 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT This Reimbursement Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into as of March 13, 2019 by and between the City of EI Segundo, a general law city and municipal corporation ("City"), and BRE EI Segundo Holdco LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company ("Developer"). The parties agree as follows: 1. Recitals. This Agreement is made with reference to the following facts and circumstances: a. Developer filed an application for the creation of a new Specific Plan area on approximately 9 acres along Pacific Coast Highway between Holly Avenue and Palm Avenue to allow a mixed-use development of residential and commercial development and to build new parking structures (the "Project") on behalf of BRE EI Segundo Holdco LLC ("BRE") through its representative, MAR CDC Holly LLC. A more complete description is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. b. The Project requires environmental review, preparation of environmental technical reports and documents under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); the retention of costs of attorneys' fees; the retention and costs of professional consultants; the costs of work performed by City staff to complete a number of tasks including environmental review, zoning review, plans review, preparation of reports, and project management duties (collectively, "Project Costs"). The EIR consultant's proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit B, which is incorporated by this reference. The Project Management consultant's proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit C, which is incorporated by this reference. C. City believes it is in the public interest for Developer to pay such Project Costs. Developer understands that all work performed by the City related to the Project will be under the direction of City, but that the Project Costs shall be at Developer's expense. 2. City Reimbursement. Developer agrees to fully reimburse the City for the Project Costs. City has estimated the Project Costs as being approximately $500,000. This amount includes the environmental consulting services to be performed by Dudek as described in Exhibit B; Project management consulting services to be performed by JWA Urban Consultants, Inc., as described in Exhibit C; and an estimated City Administrative Cost of ($150,000). However, Developer acknowledges that the actual amount of such Project Costs may be different. Nonetheless, even though the actual amount of such Project Costs may be different, Developer agrees to reimburse the City for the full amount of the actual costs of such Project Costs in 1 Agreement No. 5757 the manner provided in this Agreement. City will provide Developer with an accounting of the Project Costs on a monthly basis, which accounting Developer agrees will be conclusive, in the absence of manifest error. The total cost of the Project Costs, as disclosed by the accounting, is called the "Reimbursement Amount." 3. Citv has No Obligation to Aoprove Proms By signing this Agreement, Applicant acknowledges and understands that this Agreement in no way obligates the City to approve any of the entitlements or environmental documents for the Project. The City and its elected and appointed officials retain sole discretion to either approve or deny any of the environmental documents or entitlements that are the subject of this Agreement and needed to effectuate the Project. 4. Method of Reimbursement. a. Initial Deposit. Except as provided below, upon execution of this Agreement, Applicant/Developer agrees to deposit with City $150,000 ("Deposit Amount") which represents 30 percent of the total estimated Reimbursement Amount. Costs associated with the Project will be charged against the deposit amount. b. The Deposit Amount will be placed in a non-interest bearing trust account established by the City Manager. Developer understands and agrees that City will not pay interest to Developer on the Deposit Amount and Developer will not seek such interest payments from City. C. RReeolenishment Deposit. Whenever the Deposit Amount balance falls below $50,000, the City may request Developer to replenish the amount ("Replenishment Deposit"), bearing in mind the amount of work left to be completed. At the time such replenishment request is made, the Applicant/Developer may request the City provide it with a copy of all Project Costs to date, to the extent such Project Costs have not already been provided by Section 2 above. d. Developer agrees to deliver a Replenishment Deposit to City within 10 business days following the City's request. e. Should the actual Reimbursement Amount exceed the Deposit Amount, Developer agrees to promptly pay City any difference. Should the Reimbursement Amount be less than the Deposit Amount, City will refund Developer any remaining Deposit Amount to Developer within 30 days after determining the Reimbursement Amount. 5. Citv Administrative Costs. Administrative costs incurred by City, including, without limitation, staff time, legal costs, fees and services, must be reimbursed on a time 2 Agreement No. 5757 and materials basis based on current City reimbursement rates. A copy of the current rates are attached hereto as Exhibit C. If these rates change, City shall provide Developer with the new fees in writing. As described in Section 2 above, it is currently estimated that such administrative costs will total $150,000. Developer acknowledges that such amount is an estimate only and that the actual administrative costs may be more or less than such amount. Such costs will be deducted by City from the Deposit Amount on a monthly basis. 6. Developer Default. Should Developer fail to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, then City may, at its option, pursue any one or more or all of the remedies available to it under this Agreement, at law or in equity. Without limiting any other remedy which may be available to it, if Developer fails to pay either the Deposit Amount or a Replenishment Deposit, or fails to fully reimburse the City for the Project Costs, City may cease performing its obligations under this Agreement and may bring an action to recover all outstanding and unreimbursed costs and expenses incurred by the City in completing the studies, together with interest thereon from the date incurred at the rate of 10% per annum. 7. Term. This Agreement will terminate either (i) 12 months from the date Applicant/Developer's application has been approved by the City; or (ii) when the Project has been disapproved or the application has been formally withdrawn. Disapproval of the Project or the Developer's withdrawal of the application does not excuse Developer from reimbursing the City for the Project Costs incurred up to such date of disapproval or withdrawal pursuant to this Agreement. 8. Conflicts of Interest. a. Consultants Work for Citv. City has sole discretion to direct the work and evaluate the performance of the employees and contractors assigned to work on the Project, and City retains the sole right to terminate or replace any such employees or contractors. Notwithstanding the fact that Developer provides funding forthe performance of the reports and studies provided hereunder, such documents prepared hereunder or any approvals granted reflect the City's independent judgment, and City has no obligation to approve the Project. The City agrees that it will inform Developer in advance of making any such personnel, consultant, or subconsultant changes. b. No Emplovment by Developer. Developer represents and warrants that: For the 12 -month period preceding the submission of its application for the Project, Developer has not entered into any arrangement to pay finance consideration to, and has not made any payment to, the City's consultants retained for the Project. 3 Agreement No. 5757 ii. For a period of 12 months after final resolution of Developer's application for the Project, Applicant, nor any of its agents, shall enter into any financial relationship with any consultants retained for the Project, or with any City official, agent or employee. Nor, during such period, shall Developer propose to enter into any future relationship with the consultants, or with any City official, agent or employee. iii. It has not entered into any arrangement to pay financial consideration to, and has not made any payment to, any City official, agent or employee that would create a legally cognizable conflict of interest as defined in the Political Reform Act (California Government Code §§ 87100 et seq.). C. Communications with Consultants. Developer may only communicate with consultants retained hereunder with the permission of the City's Director of Planning and Building Safety. In no case may Developer direct consultant as to how to undertake or prepare consultant's work product. 9. Compliance with Law. Developer will, at its sole cost and expense, comply with all of the requirements of all federal, state, and local authorities now in force, or which may hereafter be in force, pertaining to this Agreement. 10. 'Waiver of Breach. Any express or implied waiver of a breach of any term of this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of any further breach of the same or other term of this Agreement. 11, Insolvencv. Receiver. Either the appointment of a receiver to take possession of all or substantially all of the assets of Developer, or a general assignment by Developer for the benefit of creditors, or any action taken or offered by Developer under any insolvency or bankruptcy action, will constitute a breach of this Agreement by Developer, and in such event this Agreement will automatically cease and terminate if Developer or its successor or assign cease or fails to timely pay any amount due and payable by Developer (or its successor or assign) under this Agreement. 12. Notices. Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, all notices or other communications required or permitted by this Agreement or by law to be served on or given to either party to this Agreement by the other party will be in writing and will be deemed served when personally delivered to the party to whom they are directed, or in lieu of the personal service, upon deposit in the United States Mail, certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to: 4 Agreement No. 5757 Developer at: BRE c/o MAR CDC Holly, LLC 721 N Douglas Street EI Segundo, CA 90245 310-782-2525 Attn: Lionel Uhry City at: City of EI Segundo Attn: Gregg McClain, Planning Manager 350 Main Street EI Segundo, CA 90245 310-524-2393 Either party may change its address for the purpose of this Section by giving written notice of the change to the other party. 13. Acceptance of Electronic Signatures. The Parties agree that agreements ancillary to this Agreement and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by electronic mail in "portable document format" (i.e., .pdf) form, or by facsimile transmission. Such signature will be deemed to be and treated in all respects as an original signature. 14. Governing Law, This Agreement is made in and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this Agreement will be in Los Angeles County. 15. Partial Invalidity. Should any provision of this Agreement be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be either invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement will remain in effect, unimpaired by the holding. 16. Integration. This instrument and its attachments constitute the sole agreement between City and Applicant/Developer respecting the matters above and correctly sets forth the obligations of City and Applicant/Developer. 17. Construction. The language of each part of this Agreement will be construed simply and according to its fair meaning, and this Agreement will never be construed either for or against either party. 18. Authorlty/Modification, The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment. The City's manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of City. 5 Agreement No. 5757 19. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument executed on the same date. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written. F EL SEGUN , a municipal corporation / Scott Mitnick, City Manager ATTEST: Y--V� D' F-ev, Tracy Weaver, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ® for Mark D. Hensley, Cty ttorney -�tx' M BRE EI Segundo Holdco LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Patrick VoIZ, Princip Agreement No. 5757 Exhibit A Project Proposal Agreement No. 5757 PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR PACIFIC COAST COMMONS Introduction BRE EI Segundo Holdco LLC ("BRE") proposes to redevelop the surface parking areas of the Fairfield Inn & Suites and Aloft Hotel properties, as well as the old Hacienda Restaurant site, with a new mixed use development that will greatly benefit the City of EI Segundo. The Pacific Coast Commons ("PCC") project will add 263 housing units, above 11,000 square feet of commercial space, and create a pedestrian oriented upgrade to an approximately quarter -mile of street frontage along the PCH Corridor. The project will activate this underutilized portion of PCH, allowing it to be developed to its fullest potential. New sidewalks will be built, allowing for outdoor restaurant seating and curb -edge treatments to separate the sidewalks from the traffic along PCH to create a safer, more comfortable, and more inviting pedestrian zone. Developing the approximate quarter - mile of PCH with commercial businesses and restaurants at the ground floor level will add life, vibrancy and pedestrian activity to the area by creating a walkable corridor along this area of PCH which can tie in with the surrounding businesses. These new businesses will be sustained not only by the existing business community, but also by the addition of the new residents that 263 new units will bring. Housing supply in EI Segundo has not kept pace with housing demand in recent years. There is little in the way of moderately -priced housing for children of City of EI Segundo residents, seniors, first -responders, teachers, and other public employees. The project will also provide a variety of new housing opportunities in EI Segundo, ranging in size from studio to two-bedroom units, in addition to six townhome units. The various unit sizes would provide a variety of price points for people to find housing. It is anticipated that the residential units will be for -rent apartments and the six townhome units will be for -sale. Additionally, businesses need to have available housing in the area to attract employees. As the City's quality of life is in large part dependent on the tax base from the private sector, providing new housing will help the City retain and attract the businesses that support the City's services. The proposed mixed use development on these parking lots is a more appropriate use on the PCH Corridor, given the adjacent multi -family residential development to the west and north, and the hospitality/office/other commercial development along PCH, east, north and south of the sites. 1 Agreement No. 5757 BRE proposes to redevelop the surface parking lots of the Fairfield Inn & Suites and Aloft Hotel properties, as well as the old Hacienda Restaurant, ballroom, and meeting room spaces through the adoption of a Specific Plan. The project site includes the property bounded by Holly Avenue on the south, Mariposa Avenue on the north, Indiana Street on the east and Pacific Coast Highway ("PCH") on the west, in addition to the property that is currently used for the Fairfield Inn & Suites Hotel parking between Mariposa Avenue on the south and Palm Avenue on the north, just west of PCH. The Union 76 gas station and Carl's Jr restaurant sites are not part of the Specific Plan area. Although the Specific Plan areas include the Fairfield Inn & Suites and Aloft Hotel properties, there will be no additional floor area added to the hotel sites identified as Areas 2 and 3 below. (See Exhibit A — Specific Plan area.) The Specific Plan area totals approximately 9 acres, including that portion of the property that extends into Pacific Coast Highway. The area currently has a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial for the property south of Mariposa Avenue and Parking for the property north of Mariposa Avenue. (See Exhibit B.) The zoning for the areas correspond with a designation of General Commercial (C-3) for the area south of Mariposa Avenue and Parking (P) for the area north of Mariposa Avenue. (See Exhibit C). The entire area would receive a new General Plan Land Use Designation and zoning of Pacific Coast Commons Specific Plan. There would be five subdistricts within the Specific Plan area for the different uses, i.e., residential, retail/parking, hotel. Proposed D velo men The project area consists of 5 primary areas. (See Exhibit D.) Area 1, Area 4, and Area 5 together constitute the areas where new floor area will be constructed (the "New Development Area"). Area 2 and Area 3 together constitute the areas where the existing Aloft and Fairfield Hotels are located and there will be no new floor area constructed (the "Existing Development Area"). Each area is further described below. « Area 1(Pacific Coast Commons South Mixed Use Building) — is currently developed with surface parking for the Aloft Hotel and W XYZ lounge. There are currently 167 parking spaces on this site. The parking and porte-cochere for the Aloft Hotel are primarily accessed from a driveway entrance along PCH which will remain, but there is also an exit driveway along Indiana Street. Area 1 would be redeveloped with a 6 story mixed-use development which will consist of approximately 6,200 square feet of ground floor commercial space along PCH, 120 residential units on the second through fifth floors, and a clubhouse on the sixth floor. The residential units will be made up of 44 -studio, 52 - one bedroom, and 24 - two bedroom units. There will be an on-site leasing office. The building and associated parking will be approximately 66 feet in height to the top of the roof. 2 Agreement No. 5757 The gross building area is approximately 141,136 square feet and the building footprint, including parking garage, is 48,279 square feet. There will be 336 parking spaces for the Aloft Hotel, residential, and commercial uses in a parking structure that consists of six above grade levels and two below grade levels. Parking is calculated at one space for each studio unit, one and a half spaces for each one -bedroom unit, and two spaces for each two-bedroom unit. Guest spaces will be provided at a ratio of one space for every three units. The existing 167 hotel parking spaces will be replaced with a total of 126 hotel parking spaces representing a 25% reduction supported by a parking utilization analysis of existing hotel operations, and the commercial uses will share parking with the hotel guests. Roof deck amenities for the residential portion of the PCH/Holly building, including a pool, are planned for portions of the top deck of the parking structure and will be set back from Indiana Street. The parking structure will be accessed from both Indiana Street and PCH with residents coming in from Indiana Street and Hotel patrons accessing from PCH. • Area 2 (Aloft Hotel Building) - is developed with the existing 9 -story Aloft Hotel and W XYZ lounge. The hotel is approximately 100 feet in height and has 246 rooms. The hotel operates 24 hours a day. The lounge, which serves the hotel, is open daily from 4 p.m. to midnight. There is no additional FAR planned for this area and the number of employees (approximately 89 employees split over 3 shifts) during peak hours is not expected to change. • Area 3 (Fairfield Hotel Building) is developed with the existing Fairfield Inn & Suites Hotel. The hotel is made up of two buildings. The main building is two stories and approximately 39 feet high. The west tower is nine stories and approximately 66,000 square feet and 85 feet in height. There are 350 rooms. The hotel operates 24 hours a day. The current entry to the Hotel is located at a driveway on PCH, which continues through to Indiana Street. The primary access to the Hotel will continue to be at the currently utilized driveway on PCH. There is no additional development of FAR planned for this area and the number of employees (approximately 88 employees split over three shifts) during peak hours is not expected to change. • Area 4 (Fairfield Parking and Commercial Use Building) is currently developed with the old Carrasco's Restaurant (formerly the Hacienda Restaurant) which is no longer in operation, a Discovery Rent-A-Car business, and ballroom and meeting space area for the Hotel which is still periodically used. The existing building is two stories and 36 feet high. It is attached to the 9 -story west tower and is included in the square footage listed above for the west tower. There is currently a driveway 3 Agreement No. 5757 entrance on PCH to this building just south of Mariposa Avenue which would be eliminated with the redevelopment of this Area. This building will be demolished. Area 4 will be redeveloped with approximately 2,800 square feet of single -story commercial space along PCH and a 180 space parking structure providing replacement parking for the Fairfield hotel above and to the rear of the commercial space. The 180 replacement parking spaces represents a 25% reduction over the existing Fairfield hotel parking which is supported by a parking utilization analysis of existing hotel operations, Commercial uses are expected to share parking with hotel guests. The building is anticipated to have 5 above grade parking levels and would be approximately 43 feet to the top of the roof. The gross building area of the commercial development will be approximately 4,004 square feet and the building footprint, including the parking garage, will be 28,985 square feet and accessed from the existing driveway on PCH that serves the Fairfield Hotel. • Area 5 (Pacific Coast Commons North) is the surface parking area for the Fairfield Inn & Suites north of Mariposa Avenue. There are currently 240 parking spaces on this site which are accessed from Mariposa Avenue and there are exit only driveways on PCH and Palm Avenue. Area 5 will be redeveloped with a mixed-use of residential and commercial. It is anticipated that there would be approximately 2,000 square feet of ground floor commercial space fronting PCH and 143 residential units. The main building will consist of 137 for rent residential units made up of 47 studio, 67 one- bedroom, and 23 two-bedroom units. There will be an on-site leasing office and a community room for the residents. Parking for this building will be provided at one space for each studio unit, one and a half spaces for each one -bedroom unit, and two spaces for each two-bedroom unit. Guest spaces will be provided at a ratio of one space for every three units. There will be 240 parking spaces provided in the parking structure and Commercial uses will share parking with the 46 guest parking spaces. Additionally there will be six for -sale townhouse units along the northwestern side of the property. These townhouse units will be four stories with 3 -bedrooms and will each have their own 2 -car garage accessed off the private drive between Mariposa Ave. and Palm Ave. The parking structure will have 6 above grade levels floors and will be 66 feet at the top of the roof along Pacific Coast Highway. There will be a clubhouse and common amenities on the top floor and a rooftop pool which will be set back from Indiana Street. The gross building area of the main building is anticipated to be approximately 168,126 square feet with a building footprint, including parking garage, of 47,423 square feet. The existing driveway on PCH would be eliminated and the parking structure would be accessed from a private drive off of Mariposa and Palm Avenues. 4 Agreement No. 5757 All of the commercial development along PCH would be designed to have a pedestrian friendly improved sidewalk area that would allow for outdoor seating. The development will include edge treatments, including landscaping, to separate the sidewalks from the traffic along PCH. Parking is being proposed as follows: Residential - Studio units would be parked at 1 space per unit. One bedroom units would be parked at 1.5 spaces per unit. Two bedroom units would be parked at 2.0 spaces per unit. Guest parking would be parked at one space for every 3 units. • Hotel - All existing hotel parking will be replaced at 75% of the existing hotel parking. This is supported by a parking utilization analysis of existing hotel operations, and will result in a total of 306 hotel parking spaces for both Hotels, which combined have a total of 596 rooms (a total of .51 parking spaces per room). • Commercial — Commercial uses will share parking with hotel guests and guest parking. As part of the development, it is proposed that Mariposa Avenue would be widened on the south side to allow for a dedicated right turn lane heading southbound. No new curb cuts are proposed along PCH and two existing PCH driveways would be eliminated. • The ingress and egress to the parking structure on Area 1 for hotel guests will be primarily from the existing driveway on PCH, which will continue to be right -turn in and out only. Hotel guests will not have primary access from Indiana Street. Residents would have ingress and egress to the parking structure from Indiana Street, which can be accessed from Holly Avenue and Mariposa Avenue. • The entrance to the parking structure on Area 4 would be from the existing driveway on PCH adjacent to the Fairfield Inn & Suites Hotel which provides right -turn only ingress and egress. Additionally, vehicles could exit the parking to Indiana Street, similar to the current condition. Upon exiting on Indiana Street, vehicles could proceed to either Mariposa Avenue, where there is a light, or to Palm Avenue, where left turns are allowed but there is no light. Parking for the hotel would now be all on- site and it would not be necessary for hotel guests or employees to exit the property and park across Mariposa Avenue, thus eliminating the safety issue of hotel guests crossing Mariposa Avenue between the Fairfield Hotel and the existing surface parking lot. 5 Agreement No. 5757 • The entrance to the parking structure on Area 5 would be from a driveway running along the west side of the proposed residential development between Mariposa and Palm Avenue. The driveway would be accessed from both Mariposa Avenue and Palm Avenue. Construction & Pha,sinq Construction of the New Development Area would be phased. The first phase of development would consist of the Area 4 development. The second phase of construction would consist of either the Area 1 or Area 5 development and the third phase of development would consist of whichever of the Area 1 or Area 5 was not constructed in the second phase. The anticipated construction timing is as follows: Phase 1 construction start: 6 months after EIR certification Phase 1 construction completion: 9 months after Phase 1 construction start Phase 2 construction start: 1 month after Phase 1 construction completion Phase 2 construction completion: 24 months after Phase 2 construction start Phase 3 construction start: 1 month after Phase 2 construction completion Phase 3 construction completion: 24 months after Phase 3 construction start Architecture The new mixed use buildings and parking structures will be designed to be complimentary to the existing Aloft and Fairfield Hotels. The architecture will have a modern feel, with neutral colors, with natural and composite material accents which will blend with the structures along PCH as well as in the adjacent neighborhood. The buildings will not be any taller than the existing Aloft and Fairfield hotels. The commercial properties will have expansive windows, similar to the restaurants in the Gateway development across the street. In addition to requiring a Specific Plan to set development standards for this unique development, the project will also require approval of a vesting tentative tract map to create condominium units to separate the commercial from the residential areas and to allow for the option for the residential uses to be developed as condominium units. BRE also seeks approval of a Site Plan for the proposed development. As development will have to be phased in order to provide staging areas and insure there 0 Agreement No. 5757 is parking for the hotels during development, a Development Agreement will be requested to extend the life of the entitlements for a ten year period. In exchange for the Development Agreement the Developer will commit to widening Mariposa Avenue to provide the dedicated right -turn only lane, will commit to advertising the units in the EI Segundo Herald, and to the extent allowed by law, will initially reserve the housing for city residents, public employees, and teachers in the ESUSD. Surroundinq Properties North — the property to the immediate north of the Specific Plan area in the block between Mariposa and Palm Avenues has a land use designation of General Commercial and a corresponding zoning designation of General Commercial (C-3). This corner is developed with a Carl's Jr. Restaurant. The property to the north across Palm Avenue has land use designations of General Commercial on the northern corner and Multi -Family to the rear of that. The zoning designations correspond with zoning of General Commercial (C-3) and Multi -Family Residential (R-3). The northern corner of PCH is developed with a vacant commercial building and surface parking lot which was previously home to the Stick and Stein restaurant. To the west of that building is a multi -family residential building. South — the property to the south of the Specific Plan area has a land use designation of General Commercial and a corresponding zoning designation of General Commercial (C-3). The northwest corner of PCH and Mariposa Avenue is developed with a Union 76 gas station. The property to the south of Holly Avenue is developed with a commercial development including a Walgreens drug store, Wells Fargo bank, Chipotle restaurant, T -Mobile store, and The Habit restaurant. East — directly east of the site is PCH. To the east of PCH, the property has a general plan designation of General Commercial and Corporate Office and zoning of General Commercial (C-3) and Corporate Office (CO). The uses include the restaurants at Gateway, Ralphs Market, a retail shopping center which includes In -N -Out and EI Polio Loco, and an approximate 6 -story office building. West — the property directly west of the project site has a General Plan designation of Multi -Family and a zoning designation of Multi -Family Residential (R-3). The property is developed with multiple -family units. Proiect Obiectives • Create a walkable community along PCH • Eliminate existing safety issue of Fairfield guest crossing Mariposa Ave. • Provide new housing opportunities in the City • Help retain existing businesses by provided needed housing for employees Agreement No. 5757 • Improve the jobs/housing balance in the City by creating more housing • Provide a new customer tax base for existing businesses in the City by increasing the residential population • Improve air quality by providing housing for those who work in the City so that they may reduce their vehicle miles traveled • Redevelop underutilized properties • Provide fiscal benefits to the City's general fund by way of increased employment, utility, business license, property and other tax revenues H Agreement No. 5757 Exhibit B Dudek Proposal Proposal to Prepare an EIR for the BRE Specific Plan Project PREPARED FOR City of EI Segundo April 19, 2019 Agreement No. 5757 Cover Letter April 19, 2019 Gregg McClain, Planning Manager City of EI Segundo 350 Main Street EI Segundo, California 90245 Subject: BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Dear Mr. McClain, reement No. 5757 We are pleased to submit this proposal for the preparation of environmental documentation for the proposed Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and Mariposa Specific Plan Project (project) in the City of EI Segundo (City). Based on our understanding of the project, Dudek is proposing the preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines. Dudek Senior Project Manager Kristin Starbird will manage this EIR, bringing her proven track record of exceptional client service and commitment to excellence to this important project. She was the senior project manager for the largest land development project in Los Angeles County in recent years; the Centennial Specific Plan Project EIR, which was approved in 2018 and included development of 10 million square feet of non- residential development with 19,333 residential units. She has completed numerous CEQA documents for high- profile urban mixed-use redevelopment projects, includingthe Aviation Station Mixed -Use Project EIR, Fullerton Transportation Center Specific Plan EIR, and the Beach and Orangethorpe (The Source) Mixed -Use Specific Plan Project EIR. Using her successful experience with high-profile and complex projects, Ms. Starbird will prepare a comprehensive EIR for this project that meets all City standards. Dudek is submitting this proposal to conduct the CEQA documentation only. Dudek is ready to assist the City in the environmental review process for this project and can begin preparation of the EIR and required technical analyses upon receipt of a written notice to proceed. Our team's experience navigating projects through the CEQA process will help us deliver this environmental documentation on time and within budget. We look forward to the opportunity to assist you with this important project. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Ms. Starbird by phone at 626.204.9839 or by email at kstarbird@dudek.com. Sincerely, r Kristin Starbird Senior Project Manager _..._..................... .............. pecific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page i Agreement NPR Intentionally left blank 'BRE Specific Plan —Env—ironm—e'n'-t.aI Documentation Proposal Page ii Table of Contents SECTIONS Agreement No. 5757 CoverLetter........................................................................................................................................................................................... i TheDudek Advantage........................................................................................................................................................................1 TeamQualifications............................................................................................................................................................................3 RepresentativeProject Experience...................................................................................................................................................7 ProjectUnderstanding.....................................................................................................................................................................11 Scopeof Work...................................................................................................................................................................................13 ProjectSchedule........................................................................................................................................................—................... 26 ProjectBudget..................................................................................................................................................................................29 TABLES 1 Project Schedule.............................................................................................................................................................. 28 2 Cost Estimate ......... -...............................................................................................„...............................................„,..........29 FIGURE 1 Team Organization. ........... -- .... -- ....... .... -- ......................... --- .... -- .. ................ .... ...... .......... --- ................. 3 APPENDIX A Resumes BRE S ecific Plan EnvironmeH_.,, ._ ...,.,..........� _, _., .,...�.,,, H p� ...... ntalDocumentation P Hi Proposal Page Agreement N INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK BRE Plan Environmental Specific..�,M_..�..,��.._._....µ,�....w..�......µ.w w.......����..........._ p Documentation Proposal Page iv Agreement No. 5757 The Dudek Advantage . .......... Focused on California's Municipalities Dudek is a California-based environmental firm with more than 400 planners, scientists, facilitators, and support staff statewide. We assist municipalities on a broad range of projects that improve California's communities, infrastructure, and natural environment. From planning, design, and permitting through construction, we move projects forward through the complexities of regulatory compliance, budgetary and schedule constraints, and conflicting stakeholder interests. We have a long history of providing California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) services to municipalities in the Los Angeles region. We know the local environmental resources and agency policies for resource management, development, impact assessment, and mitigation. We specialize in planning and executing the following: Dudek at a Glance • Multidisciplinary environmental and engineering services • Eleven California offices, including Pasadena • 400+ employees • Top 125 U.S. Environmental Firms (Engineering News -Record) • 92% rating for reliability, timeliness, and responsiveness (Dun & Bradstreet, 2016) • More than 2,800 successful CEQA/NEPA documents prepared • Municipal development projects using 38 years' experience in California planning and permitting knowledge • Legally defensible CEQA/National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation • Multidiscipline expertise to prepare various technical studies, reports, data analyses, and surveys • Peer review of technical reports prepared by other consultants, including, but not limited to, geotechnical reports, traffic impact reports, hazardous materials investigations, and hydrologic studies • Monitoring programs that maintain project momentum and meet schedules Depth and Variety of Staff As a medium-size firm, Dudek is small enough for project managers to make nimble decisions, quickly draw from our pool of technical resources, and stay engaged with you from start to finish. We are large enough that our diverse staff can tackle a spectrum of environmental and planning challenges. Team leaders can quickly assemble and mobilize the right technical experts for a project. Our in-house team includes the following: • CEQA/NEPA specialists • American Institute of Certified Planners - certified land use planners • Registered Environmental Property Assessors • Noise and air quality specialists • Architectural historians • Registered professional archaeologists • Traffic/transportation specialists • Biologists and restoration experts • Registered landscape architects • Certified arborists and foresters • Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)-accredited professionals • Certified geographic information system (GIS) professionals • Certified hydrogeologists • Licensed geologists • Licensed professional engineers « Licensed contractors BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 1 Agreement N Environmental Services Dudek has prepared more than 2,800 environmental documents in compliance with CEQA/NEPA for large and small projects throughout California, in addition to managing the environmental review process for many local agencies on a contractual basis. Documents we prepare, initiate, and process include environmental impact reports (EIRs), statements of overriding consideration, findings of fact, mitigated negative declarations, negative declarations, initial studies (ISs), categorical or statutory exemptions per CEQA; as well as environmental impact statements, environmental assessments, categorical exclusions, and findings of no significant impact per NEPA. Our team of scientists, planners, landscape architects, economists, and engineers has reviewed hundreds of technical reports to certify that the analyses in CEQA documents are technically accurate and legally sound. We incorporate public comments regarding the potential impacts of a project on the natural and built environments, and as required by CEQA/NEPA, we analyze ways in which any identified significant effects/impacts of the project can be avoided or mitigated. Dudek prepares complete and legally defensible environmental review documents supported by substantial evidence, and we have never had a CEQA document successfully challenged in court. Dudek staff has a comprehensive understanding of CEQA/NEPA regulations. Dudek understands how to tier analyses from existing program -level environmental documents, thereby streamlining the environmental review process and recognizing schedule and budget efficiencies. The Dudek team has participated in all aspects of the environmental review process and will perform the scope of work tasks by implementing the following: • Process management for all stages, starting with preparation, release, and management of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) scoping process • Attendance at public scoping meeting(s) • Environmental document drafts and associated technical analyses preparation (e.g., air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, noise, cultural) and peer review of Applicant's studies/plans • City staff and consultant discourse to provide input relating to CEQA procedures, requirements and substantive issues, including, but not limited to, the public noticing process, filings with state and local agencies, alternatives development, and the feasibility of mitigation measures • Response -to -comments process catalogue and management • Final CEQA document preparation and processing • Planning Commission and City Council public hearing attendance, presentation, and testimony • Filing all applicable notices (i.e., public notices, scoping meeting and/or Draft EIR/environmental impact statement meeting notices, Notices of Intent, Notice of Completion (NOC), NOP, Notice of Determination (NOD) and Assembly Bill (AB) 52/Senate Bill (SB) 18) documentation with the appropriate entities (i.e., the public, Los Angeles County Clerk, State Clearinghouse, and Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)) Challenges to CEQA CEQA documents are often subject to legal challenge. Dudek staff knows the procedural and substantive law that is critical for a legally defensible CEQA analysis. Our broad experience preparing CEQA documents for particularly contentious projects gives us an invaluable legal perspective. We understand firsthand the significant costs and risks of CEQA litigation, as well as the critical importance of preventive planning. We provide clients with practical and effective advice for strengthening EIRs and other CEQA documents based on our knowledge and experience from handling the full range of CEQA cases in our analyses. Dudek has a proven record of accomplishment working closely with the City Attorney's Office to prepare legally defensible CEQA documents. BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal w..,._....IT....................... LLPage 2 Team Qualifications Agreement No. 5757 We have extensive work on high-profile, mixed-use infill development projects throughout Southern California, making us extremely familiar with the environmental considerations to be evaluated in the EIR. Our team's experience with similar projects includes the Robertson Lane Hotel EIR, Centennial Specific Plan EIR, Covina Forward Project EIR/Categorical Exclusion, Sunset Time EIR, Elysian Park Lofts EIR, and Santa Monica Downtown Specific Plan and EIR. This experience, combined with the depth of knowledge held by our senior leadership in planning and environmental issues throughout the greater Southern California area, will allow us to complete the requested work in a timely, complete, and cost-effective manner. Kristin Starbird will serve as the project manager and primary point of contact for the City. Ms. Starbird recently joined Dudek where she managed the preparation of numerous CEQA documents for complex development projects throughout Southern California. Ms. Starbird will be supported by environmental planning and technical specialists with regional experience preparing environmental documents for similar projects. The key personnel proposed for the project work in Dudek's Pasadena office and will be supported by specialists and support staff in the firm's Southern California offices, including San Juan Capistrano, Santa Barbara, Encinitas, and Riverside. Figure 1 outlines the Dudek team's organization and is followed by brief biographies for each team member. Resumes for the Dudek team are in Appendix A. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Manager Kristin Starbird TIF ; i j, , Environmental Planning_ Air Quality/ Sabrina Alonso Greenhouse Gas/Energy Jennifer Reed Cultural Resources Water Supply Mike Williams, PhD Christian Hunter, PhD Linda Kry Historic Resources Noise Samantha Murray, MA Mark Storm, INCE Bd. Cert. Kate Kaiser, MSHP — -- —_,. ..,,,,... BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 3 r ',Ct 1'n ,I lit (Kristin Starbird Ms. Starbird is a senior project manager with over 16 years' experience in the management and preparation of environmental documents pursuant to CEQA and NEPA. Ms. Starbird is responsible for managing the environmental review documents and process, technical reports, schedules, and budgets for a wide variety of controversial and complex public- and private -sector projects, including general, master, and specific plans; mixed-use and transit -oriented developments; residential Agreement Npy University of Texas, Austin MA, Public Affairs BA, Social Work Professional Affiliations AEP tract map developments; flood control infrastructure projects; recreational/park projects; and institutional facilities. She was the senior project manager for the largest land development project in Los Angeles County in recent years: the Centennial Specific Plan Project EIR. She has prepared numerous CEQA documents for high- profile urban mixed-use redevelopment projects, including the Fullerton Transportation Center Specific Plan EIR, Aviation Station Transit -Oriented Development Project EIR, and the Beach and Orangethorpe (The Source) Mixed - Use Specific Plan EIR. She is highly experienced at conducting public meetings for high-profile and contentious projects, as required for the Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan EIR and numerous other scoping and public outreach meetings. L I it ni I i :11i I I i iiI, Sabrina Alonso Sabrina Alonso is an environmental analyst with a background in Education ecology. Ms. Alonso focuses on the preparation of CEQA documents University of California (UC), Santa such as ISs, mitigated negative declarations, and EIRs. She works with Barbara clients to collect data, perform research, and assist in report BS, Environmental Studies preparation. She has assisted with the preparation of numerous Professional Affiliations environmental documents for urban infill and development projects, APA, AEP includinbg the City Yards Master Plan EIR in Santa Monica, Pacific Freeway Center EIR in Fontana, Birch Specific Plan in Carson, and the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center Master Plan EIR in Los Angeles. wide variety of public and private development projects throughout Association California, including large residential projects, commercial and retail projects, industrial projects, mixed-use developments, colleges and universities, healthcare facilities, energy projects, water and wastewater infrastructure, and transportation improvements, including California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) air quality analyses. Additionally, she has considerable experience in project planning and regulatory compliance pursuantto the California Coastal Act and has experience in project management, land -use permit processing, constraints analysis, development feasibility studies, due diligence investigations, and various other land -use planning projects. BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 4 Jennifer Reed Jennifer Reed is an air quality specialist/environmental planner with 13 Education years' experience involving the management, research, and analysis of UC Santa Barbara projects pursuant to CEQA and NEPA. She specializes in air quality and GHG BA, Environmental Studies emissions technical analyses and continues to be on the forefront of BA, Geography evolving science, emissions modeling computer programs, and regulatory Professional A llations framework. Ms. Reed has prepared air quality and GHG assessments for a AEP, Air and Waste Management wide variety of public and private development projects throughout Association California, including large residential projects, commercial and retail projects, industrial projects, mixed-use developments, colleges and universities, healthcare facilities, energy projects, water and wastewater infrastructure, and transportation improvements, including California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) air quality analyses. Additionally, she has considerable experience in project planning and regulatory compliance pursuantto the California Coastal Act and has experience in project management, land -use permit processing, constraints analysis, development feasibility studies, due diligence investigations, and various other land -use planning projects. BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 4 I1 Michael Williams, PhD Michael Williams is a paleontologist and crossed -trained archaeological field technician with more than 14 years' experience with fieldwork, fossil vertebrate specimen processing, and writing of reports for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Dr. Williams has project experience in all aspects of paleontological mitigation, including Phase I preconstruction surveys and report preparation and writing paleontological mitigation plans, IS/mitigated negative declarations, and EIRs. He also has experience attending pre -grade meetings, preparing and presenting on-site Worker Environmental Awareness Programs, monitoring for paleontological resources and supervising paleontological monitoring, coordinating spot checks and monitoring with construction superintendents and foremen, collecting and processing sediments for vertebrate microfossils, writing P 4 Agreement N Education Louisiana State University PhD, Geology and Geophysics BS, Zoology Qualified Paleontologist; Orange, Riverside, and San Diego Counties BLM California Paleontological Resource Use Permit Professional Affilliations Society of Vertebrate Paleontology final monitoring reports, and accession ing fossi Is to the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County Museum and the Cooper Center in Orange County. Linda Kry is an archaeologist with 12 years' experience in cultural Education resources management specializing in various aspects of cultural UC Los Angeles resources investigations within Los Angeles County, Orange County, BA, Anthropology Kern County, Imperial County, Inyo County, Riverside County, and the Cerritos College Mojave Desert. Her experience includes archival research, AA, Anthropology reconnaissance surveys, archaeological excavations, artifact analysis, and authoring technical reports pursuant to CEQA and Section 106 of the NHPA. Ms. Kry's extensive experience includes the management of cultural resources specialists in support of various aspects of cultural resources compliance, including Phase I surveys, construction monitoring, Native American consultation, archaeological testing and treatment, and prehistoric and historical resource significance evaluations. Samantha Murray, IMA Samantha Murray is a senior architectural historian with 12 years' professional experience in in all elements of cultural resources management, including project management, intensive -level field investigations, architectural history studies, and historical significance evaluations in consideration of the California Register of Historical Resources, the National Register of Historic Places, and local -level evaluation criteria. Ms. Murray has conducted hundreds of historical resource evaluations and developed detailed historic context statements for a multitude of property types and architectural styles, including private residential, commercial, industrial, educational, medical, ranching, mining, airport, and cemetery properties, as well as a variety of engineering structures and objects. She has also provided expertise on numerous projects requiring conformance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Education California State University (CSU), Los Angeles MA, Anthropology CSU Northridge BA, Anthropology Professional Affiliations California Preservation Foundation Society of Architectural Historians National Trust for Historic Preservation Registered Professional Archaeologist .......... _. .................,..__M..,,........,...,.,..........,. .... . BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 5 Agreement N Kate Kaiser, IISHP University of Notre Dame and Kate Kaiser is an architectural historian with 7 years' professional Education experience as a cultural resource manager specializing in CEQA University of Oregon compliance, NHPA Section 106 compliance, reconnaissance and MS, Historic Preservation intensive level surveys, archival research, cultural landscapes, and GIS. Boston University Ms. Kaiser meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional BA, Archaeology Qualification Standards for both architectural history and archaeology. Professional Allatlons Additionally, Ms. Kaiser has worked as an archaeological technician for Association for Preservation the National Park Service and U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Technology — Southwest Service. She has worked with federal, private, and local organizations to California Preservation Foundation manage multidisciplinary transportation projects, park -wide inventories, No. 00004 702 and federal land management projects. Christian Neuter, PhD Christian Hunter is a water resource engineer with 5 years' professional Education experience as an environmental analyst specializing in sustainability University of Notre Dame and evaluation, water reuse and recycling planning, and environmental risk Pontificia Universidad, Catolica de assessment. Dr. Hunter has experience working with watershed -scale Chile stakeholder groups and encouraging dialogue between conflicting water PhD, Civil and Environmental users. His research has included aspects of sustainabe water use, the Engineering, water footprint, desalination, and the water/energy nexus. Dr. Hunter is Wheaton College also fluent in Spanish. He has worked througout Southern California, , Teaching MAMABS, Physics including Los Angeles County, on projects such as the Montclair Plaza Certifications Expansion project EIR and numerous task orders for Dudek's on-call Certified Erosion Sediment and contract with the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Storm Water Inspector (CESSWI), No. 00004 702 VOI:,;° Marl(Storm, INCE Bd. Ceirt. Mark Storm is a senior acoustician with 28 years' experience as a noise Education control engineer specializing in environmental noise assessment, Massachusetts Institute of mechanical systems noise control and architectural acoustics. Mr. Storm Technology evaluates noise impacts from residential, manufacturing, industrial (e.g., BS, Aeronautics and Astronautics fossil -fueled and renewable power generation and transmission), Certifications municipal, and commercial facilities upon sensitive human and wildlife Institute of Noise Control receptors. His services include development and direction of noise and Engineering (INCE) Board Certified vibration measurement and prediction programs, mitigation Professional Affiliations recommendations, participation in public meetings, and expert witness INCE, Board of Directors, Vice testimony. Mr. Storm has authored or managed many CEQA/NEPA noise President of Public Relations technical reports and sections. He has also handled noise for several client Applications for Certification brought before the California Energy Commission. BRE Specific Plan Environmental Docum"""._....... ._..µ..._w.._...,,... .. ... _._ _.,., p entation Proposal Page 6 Agreement No. 5757 Representative Project Experience ...... .... Dudek and proposed project personnel have completed numerous infill and other mixed-use development environmental documents throughout Southern California. Following is a representative sample of projects completed by the firm and the staff members proposed for the City's project that illustrate our ability to provide the services required to prepare an EIR for the BRE Mixed Use Specific Plan Project. ; I I i i I V k II? Client: City of West Hollywood Dudek prepared an EIR for a project that involved demolishing several buildings (including historic age structures) to construct a 500,000 - square -foot buildingthat includes a 251 -room hotel, restaurants, retail stores, design showroom, and associated amenities. The project involves construction of a three -to nine -story multiuse hotel building in the West Hollywood Design District, including a 241 -room hotel, restaurants, retail stores, design showroom, and associated amenities. The proposed project adaptively reuses portions of the historic factory building that will be incorporated into the building design along Robertson Boulevard. Key issues evaluated in the EIR include historic resources, transportation and traffic, noise, air quality, and GHG emissions. ovin orwarJ Proj't,cl C IlPY, Merit: City of Covina Dudek prepared an EIR for a project that involved a General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan to develop a mixed-use transit -oriented development project. The proposed project consists of three primary components: (1) a Transit Center and Park and Ride facility; (2) the Covina Innovation, Technology, and Event Center (ITEC)—an event center and professional office/business incubator space; and (3) residential townhome units. The project required review under both CEQA and NEPA; consequently, an EIR and categorical exclusion were both prepared. Key issues for this project were noise, traffic, and parking. Dudek presented the environmental review process at all city hearings. The project was completed on an accelerated schedule of 7 months and under the originally allocated budget. Client: City of West Hollywood Dudek prepared an EIR for a project that involved a 78 -room hotel, restaurant, 88 residential units, and an art gallery. The seven -story multi -use building would include three subterranean levels of parking with 264 parking spaces. Construction of the proposed project would involve demolition of the existing 10,000 -square -foot commercial building, multiple parking lots, and a multifamily structure. Key issues associated with this project include traffic impacts to residential roadways and congested intersections, air quality, and noise and vibration construction impacts to adjacent sensitive receptors, including residences and a preschool. BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 7 Client- City of Pasadena Dudek prepared an EIR for an extended -stay hotel project at a gateway intersection into Old Town Pasadena. The five -story, 144 - room hotel was constructed to address a shortage of hotel rooms for visitors after the city opened its expanded Convention Center. Key project issues included the addition of more traffic on local streets and Interstate 210; pedestrian and bicycle circulation; air quality and noise impacts during construction and operation due to the project site's proximity to Interstate 210; land use compatibility with surrounding office, institutional, and commercial uses; proximity to historical resources and the Old Pasadena Historic District; and visual and aesthetic impacts. Client., Kaiser Permanente Agreement N Dudek is currently preparing an EIR for redevelopment of the Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center campus. The project would proceed under a Master Plan/Development Plan Permit for Los Angeles Medical Center. The primary goal is to replace inefficient and aged medical office buildings and address medical provider deficits in member communities by re -allocating providers and services on this campus, as well as distributing medical services to adjacent communities. The project is proposed to be implemented in four phases and would include new and/or replacement medical office buildings and/or parking. The project consists of 277,000 building gross square feet on an approximately 15.34 -acre campus. The net change in the Medical Office Building and/or hospital floor area would be 89,000 building gross square feet at the Los Angeles Medical Center campus. It is anticipated that approvals required for the project may include, but are not limited to, the following: certification of the final EIR; site plan review; demolition permits; haul route approval; grading, excavation, foundation, and associated building permits; project permit compliance approval; a conditional use permit; Specific Plan amendment; and other entitlements and approvals as deemed necessary and as required by the City of Los Angeles to implement the project. Unique issues for this project are aesthetics, noise, traffic, and community engagement. Extensive public outreach is being conducted as a part of the overall CEQA process. Client, City of Pasadena Dudek prepared an EIR for a proposed six -story commercial and residential infill project, providing 5,000 square feet of commercial/retail space and 64 residential units. The project is adjacent to the existing National Register of Historic Places -listed Green Hotel Apartments and Castle Green, which generated a number of community concerns associated with the project design, proximity to these treasured resources, and the potential design compatibility of the new project with the historic buildings. Key issues evaluated in the EIR included impacts to historical resources, views/aesthetics and impacts to visual character associated with the loss of a mature tree canopy, traffic and circulation, and air quality and noise impacts associated with the project site's proximity to sensitive land uses. BRE S ecific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 8 p Client: City of West Hollywood Dudek prepared an EIR for a project that involved a 2 -acre, mixed-use project site occupied by the House of Blues and 25 vacant apartment units on Sunset Boulevard. The proposed project includes construction of up to 40 residential condominium units, 5 low-income affordable housing units, a 149 -room hotel, and over 35,000 square feet of commercial and entertainment space. Key issues addressed in the CEQA document included geology and soils, traffic and parking, light and glare, height, air quality, and noise. � I I, 1 1 /I"" I .,, ilc II1 Client; City of Santa Monica Anticipating the arrival of the Exposition Light Rail Station at 4th Street and Colorado Avenue, Santa Monica's Downtown Specific Plan outlines the policy objectives and development standards for downtown Santa Monica. The Downtown Specific Plan provides a proactive strategy for downtown Santa Monica to continue to evolve into a more accessible, multimodal, pedestrian -friendly district that services the needs of a diverse community while integrating the western terminus station of the Exposition Light Rail. The guiding principles are centered on the core sustainability goal of the Land Use and Circulation Element to accommodate change near transit to preserve residential zones while contributing, through transportation demand management and infrastructure improvements, to the citywide goal of No Net New PM Peak Hour trips. The proposed plan will put forth policies Agreement N and incentives that enhance the everyday downtown experience and function. Dudek currently serves as an extension of the City of Santa Monica staff to coordinate and manage the overall project team and project. Dudek is responsible for reviewing EIR sections, confirming the accurate analysis of the Downtown Specific Plan in the EIR, and ensuring the project is on schedule and within the allocated budget. Representative projects under the direction of Ms. Stairbird while at anotllier firm include: F i In l Ird Cilentm City of Los Angeles The project involves for a 2- to 14 -story mixed-use project on an 8 -acre parcel with approximately 920 residential units and approximately 21,000 square feet of neighborhood -serving retail uses leasing offices. The project site is adjacent to the Metro Gold Line and the Los Angeles State Historic Park. The project is proximate to a network of regional transportation facilities, including the Chinatown Station and is in a transit priority area. The project requires a General Plan Amendment and zone change, site plan review, vesting tentative tract map, and development agreement. BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 9 Agreement N Client: County of Los Angeles Ms. Starbird was the project manager for an EIR for a new, Wwr community with residential, commercial, business park, recreational entertainment, water/wastewater reThe utilities, park/open space, and institutional/civic uses. Theo'ect would allow up to 19,333 dwellingunits; 7.4 millions square feet of business p lri op warehousing or light manufacturing uses); 1 million ' ... Y square feet ;,, nim rip i'Wlu'IuiWi6 II t" / of commercial uses; 1.6 million square feet of Institutional/Civic ; land uses; fire stations and a sheriff's station; and two wastewater reclamation facilities that will generate recycled „ y water. The primary entitlement actions include the adoption of a Specific Plan, zone change, General Plan amendment, development agreement, tentative parcel map, and conditional use permits. Project buildout would be implemented in phases based on future market conditions over an approximate 20 -year period through a series of future tract and parcel maps, and would be developed in coordination with the planned improvements of the Caltrans Northwest 138 Improvement Project. Client- County of Los Angeles Ms. Starbird served as project manager for the EIR for a mixed-use, transit -oriented project on 5.9 acres within unincorporated Los Angeles County and the City of Los Angeles. The project involved the demolition of existing homes and commercial uses and the construction of an urban mixed-use development with 29,500 square feet of ground -floor commercial and 390 multifamily units. The project also required relocation of a Metro bus terminal and use of Caltrans District 7 property, and required the de -annexation of property from the City of Los Angeles. Project entitlements included a General Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Zone Change, and approvals from the Airport Land Use Commission and the Local Agency Formation Commission for the County of Los Angeles. Client: City of Fullerton Ms. Starbird was the project manager for the EIR for a mixed-use redevelopment specific plan project in the 35 -acre Fullerton Transportation Center site located within and adjacent to the City of Fullerton's Central Business District. The Specific Plan included a form -based code that allows for the development of up to 1,500 residential units and 100,000 square feet of retail and office uses, as well as improvements to the existing circulation system to form a cohesive network that provides access and mobility for motorists, transit riders, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Client® City of Buena Park Ms. Starbird was the project manager program EIR for this project, currently called "The Source," located along the Beach Boulevard Entertainment Zone in Buena Park. The Specific Plan allowed for a flexible and phased development plan on the 12.5 -acre site for an urban mixed-use project with a maximum of 1,000 multifamily units in multiple high-rise structures; 355,000 square feet of retail; a 300-room/270,000-square-foot hotel, and multiple levels of subterranean parking. The site redevelopment would require the demolition of existing single- family residences and commercial properties, and implementation would be phased overtime. BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal .........�_ .._.._..............,....... ,..,........Ww ._...,Page 10 Project Understanding Agreement No. 5757 The project site is located at along the primary gateway into the City along the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and involves multiple Assessor's Identification Number (AIN), including Area 1(AIN 4139-025-075, -074, -073, -076), Area 2 (AIN 4139-025-081) Areas 3 and 4 (AIN 4139-025-091), and Area 5 (AIN 4139-024-057,-058). In total, the project site includes approximately nine gross acres. The site is surrounded by multifamily residential uses to the east and commercial uses to the west across PCH. The project site is developed with surface parking, hotels, and other commercial structures. The proposed Specific Plan components include: • Area 1: Redevelopment of the surface parking associated with the Aloft Hotel with a 5 -story mixed-use development with approximately 9,000 square feet of commercial and 120 residential units, as well a parking garage to accommodate the adjacent hotel parking and residential/commercial parking. • Area 2: Preservation of the Aloft Hotel and W XYZ Lounge. • Area 3: Preservation of the Fairfield Hotel Building. • Area 4: Redevelopment of surface parking and buildings with approximately 3,000 square feet of 1 -story commercial and a 4 -story commercial building with parking garage, which will also serve the existing Fairfield Hotel. • Area 5: Redevelopment of surface parking area with a 5 -story mixed-use project, including 3,60 square feet of commercial and 153 residential units. All of the proposed development along PCH would be designed to have pedestrian -friendly sidewalk improvements that allow for outdoor seating, as well as landscaping between pedestrians and traffic along the PCH. It is understood that the Applicant will retain a traffic consultant to prepare a traffic impact analysis, which is assumed to address short-term parking requirements during construction and potential impacts to the PCH. Dudek proposed to prepare the EIR for the proposed project. The State Office of Administrative Law has approved the proposed changes to state guidelines for implementing the CEQA, which were adopted by the Secretary of the California Natural Resources Agency in November 2018. As such, the California Natural Resources Agency has amended the CEQA Guidelines. The changes involve nearly 30 different sections of the CEQA Guidelines, addressing nearly every step of the environmental review process, including changes to the Appendix G Checklist. Dudek is well versed in the revised CEQA Guidelines and implications for the proposed EIR and will structure the EIR to incorporate all relevant changes. BRE Specific Plan Environmental Docu..�.......�w..�,.,�. ._µ,w�....-.�.,.,,.�..........�.................,...............,w...�.�,w.µ...__...ta.�..........�._,,�_,.._..�. ������mentation Proposal Page 11 Agreement NPy INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 12 Agreement No. 5757 Scope of Work - W.............<m.........�.................�.�.�...........�. ....«.�,�..,,,�.,......,.�� .nnu..,w,w.w..,www........w...........,...u...,..,,,.....,n..�.r....m....,....r.,,,ww�w.w........w�...,.d Task 1 Project Initiation, Description, and Technical Reports The Dudek team will attend one kickoff meeting with representatives from the City to confirm the approach to the CEQA documentation. In preparation for the EIR kickoff meeting, Dudek will prepare support materials, including an agenda, preliminary schedule, and comprehensive data needs list. The purpose of the meeting is to compile the relevant background data and reports, clearly define the project description, discuss important assumptions for achieving the project schedule, confirm all anticipated discretionary actions, confirm communication and protocols for ongoing coordination, and discuss issues and concerns that the City determines to be important issues for EIR analysis. Dudek will provide the Applicant with a list of data needs, including requests for information on the construction - related activities and phasing assumptions and construction/occupancy schedule. Using available information from the Specific Plan, Dudek will prepare a draft project description, including the following: (1) environmental setting overview and existing site uses and operations, (2) short-term construction phasing plan and construction methods, (3) long-term operations activities, (4) maps of the project location and site plans for the key project components, and (5) list of discretionary actions and required permit approvals. Dudek will submit the project description electronically for review. This task assumes that revisions to the project description based on any provided comments will be incorporated into the first draft EIR (Task 3.1). Dudek will perform a peer review of provided technical studies to confirm whether the documents are adequate for the purposes of the EIR for up to 20 hours of professional staff time to be conducted by the project manager and/or other senior specialists, as appropriate. This task assumes that the following reports will be provided by the Applicant and that any revisions that may be require are the responsibility of the authoring consultant. Alternately, updated or supplemental information for the technical studies may be completed by Dudek for a scope/budget augment: • Geotechnical engineering investigation • Phase I environmental site assessment or other hazards assessment documentation • Engineer's hydrology analysis demonstrating compliance with Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan/Low Impact Development and City's requirements • Traffic impact report • Utility infrastructure adequacy analysis (water/sewer pipelines, electricity, natural gas, cable) Dudek will provide the Applicant with a clear list of comments and/or requested revisions to ensure that the documents are adequate for the purposes of CEQA. Records Search. Dudek will begin by conducting a California Historical Resources Information Systems records search of the project area and a 0.5 -mile radius at the South Central Coastal Information Center, which houses cultural resource records for Los Angeles County. The purpose of the records search is to identify any previously recorded cultural resources that may be located within the project area. In addition to a review of previously BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 13 Agreement N . prepared site records and reports, the records search will also review historical maps of the project area, ethnographies, the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Historic Property Data File, and the lists of California State Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, and Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility. Native Airnerican rdination. Dudek will contact the California NAHC for a review of their Sacred Lands File. The NAHC will determine if any NAHC-listed Native American sacred lands are located within or adjacent to the project area. In addition, the NAHC will provide a list of Native American contacts for the project who should be contacted for additional information. If instructed to do so by the lead agency, Dudek will prepare and mail a letter to each of the NAHC-listed contacts, requesting that they contact us if they know of any Native American cultural resources within or immediately adjacent to the project area. This Native American contact process is for project informational purposes only and is not compliant with AB 52. Assembly Bill 52: The proposed project is subject to compliance with AB 52, which requires lead agencies to provide tribes (who have requested notification) with early notification of the proposed project and, if requested, consultation to inform the CEQA process with respect to tribal cultural resources. While AB 52 is a government -to - government process between the CEQA lead agency and California Native American tribes, Dudek will assist the City with the notification process and responding to any comment letters (if requested). Senate Bill 18: The project proposes a General Plan amendment and adoption of a Specific Plan and is therefore subject to compliance with SB 18 consultation. While SB 18 is a government -to -government process between the CEQA lead agency and Native American tribes, Dudek will assist the City with the outreach process and responding to any comment letters (if requested). No in-person meetings with Native American groups are included in this scope of work. Survey. Upon completion of the records search, Dudek will survey the project area for cultural resources. Because the proposed project area is entirely developed with no exposed sediment, an archaeological survey is not warranted. The built environment component of the survey will entail taking detailed notes and photographs of one building over 45 years old (525 North Sepulveda Boulevard), including documentation of character defining features, spatial relationships, landscaping, alterations, and the overall existing conditions of the property. The survey will be restricted to the exterior of the buildings and grounds. Record and Evaluate Resources. Los Angeles County Assessor property records indicate that the existing building complex within project Area 3 and 4 at 525 North Sepulveda Boulevard (AIN 4139-025-091), was built in 1961. It appears that the building underwent a remodel c. 2000. Therefore, the existing building will require evaluation for historical significance/integrity to determine if the proposed project has the potential to impact historical resources, as defined by CEQA. The building will be recorded on State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Series 523 Forms and will be evaluated in consideration of National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, and City (Municipal Code Sec. 15-14-4) designation criteria and integrity requirements. Should any additional resources be identified as a result of the survey requiring recordation and evaluation a budget augment may be required to address the resources. As part of this task, Dudek will conduct in-person building development research at the City to determine the nature and extent of alterations that have been made to the property overtime, and retrieve information on any previous owners/occupants. Dudek will also conduct archival research to develop the appropriate historic context for the property significance evaluations. This may include visiting local libraries, archives, and contacting relevant historical societies. BRE Specific P..........�._...,_...�_:.. Ian Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 14 pg Agreement N Cuiturall ResourcesTechnicall Report. Dudek will prepare a cultural resources technical report that will summarize the results of the cultural resources records search, Native American coordination, survey and research methodologies, and property significance evaluation. The report will discuss the proposed project description, regulatory framework, all sources consulted, research and field methodology, and recommendations for appropriate management. The report will also analyze the proposed project's potential to impact historical resources under CEQA and will provide mitigation measures as appropriate. All Department of Parks and Recreation forms will be included as an appendix to the report. We assume no more than one draft and one final version of the report will be required. Task 1 Deliverables: • Agenda, EIR schedule, and meeting minutes from the kickoff meeting • Data needs list for construction and operational assumptions • First draft project description for the EIR (MS Word and PDF) • Peer review comments and requested revisions on Applicant -prepared technical reports and data • Draft and Revised Cultural Resources Technical Report (MS Word and PDF) Task 2 Initial Study, NOP, and Scoping Meeting Prepare 1S/NOP and Il ailliing. Upon receipt of all available information, Dudek will prepare an NOP and IS, using the City -approved checklist format that is consistent with the procedural and substantive provisions of the CEQA Guidelines. The IS/NOP will be used to narrow the focus of the environmental issues addressed in the EIR, as appropriate. It is anticipated that the following CEQA issue areas will be sufficiently analyzed in the IS to allow their scoping out from further analysis in the EIR: agriculture and forestry resources; biological resources; mineral resources, and wildfire. Dudek will prepare a first draft IS/NOP in electronic format. Upon receipt of comments, Dudek will revise accordingly and submit a revised draft IS/NOP for final review before preparing the final IS/NOP for public review. It is anticipated that comments received on the revised draft IS/NOP will be minimal and mostly editorial in nature. Substantive comments requiring a second round of substantial edits will require an amendment to the budget proposed. A print -ready copy of the final IS/NOP in electronic format (MS Word and PDF) will be submitted for review and approval to print. Dudek will also prepare a draft and final NOC for submittal to the State Clearinghouse. Once approved and printed, Dudek will distribute the NOP to responsible agencies and trustee agencies via overnight delivery, and any other interested parties pursuant to the mailing list provided by the City via U.S. Postal Service mail. It is assumed that a radius map will be provided to Dudek for the NOP mailing. The NOC and 15 copies of the IS/NOP will be provided to the State Clearinghouse. Dudek will be responsible for transmittal of the Final NOP to the Los Angeles County Clerk. This task assumes the City will be responsible for publication and associated fees for the NOP in a local newspaper and that the Applicant will post a notice on site, if required. To consolidate the overall project schedule, Dudek will begin preparation of the EIR during the 30 -day public review period. Scoping Meeting. Dudek's project manager will attend and co -facilitate one scoping meeting for the project. At the City's direction, Dudek can present an overview of the Specific Plan and project description and IS, the purpose of the scoping meeting, provide an overview of the CEQA process, and answer questions raised by the public regarding the CEQA process and/or general questions regarding technical and analytic methods. This task includes preparation of a PowerPoint presentation that includes the CEQA process, summary of the NOP/IS, and overview of the project description. It is assumed that the City will coordinate the logistics for the scoping meeting. Dudek will prepare presentation materials describing or illustrating the project from the Specific Plan on up to four graphic boards to place around the room. Dudek will provide relevant meeting materials, including comment BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 15 Agreement NP forms and a sign -in sheet. Dudek will also take notes regarding the issues raised by commenting individuals that should be addressed in the EIR. Following the scoping meeting, Dudek will provide a scoping meeting summary memorandum that summarizes the verbal comments provided at the meeting. No court reporter or formal transcript of the meeting is included in this task. Task 2 Deliverables: • First draft IS/NOP: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF) • Revised draft IS/NOP: one electronic copy (MS Word in track -change and PDF) • Final IS/NOP: one unbound camera-ready hardcopy; 10 bound hardcopies; 30 CDs or thumb drives. Distribution of NOP to mailing list. File NOP with the County Clerk. • Draft and final NOC and 15 copies of IS/NOP, and mailing to State Clearinghouse • Presentation PowerPoint, comment cards/sign-in sheet, and co -facilitation at one scoping meeting • Up to three graphic poster boards for the scoping meeting • Scoping meeting summary memorandum: one (electronic copy (MS Word) Task 3 Draft Environmental Impact Report Dudek will coordinate with the City to confirm the City -preferred template and thresholds given the recent update to the CEQA Guidelines. Dudek will prepare the first draft EIR, which will include the project description developed under Task 1. The EIR will address the environmental issues in CEQA's Appendix G and will be formatted as follows: Table of Contents. The table of contents will contain a list of EIR contents, including text discussions and lists of tables and exhibits. It will also include a list of appendices that will be attached to the EIR. Executive Summary. Pursuant to Section 15123 of the CEQA Guidelines, the summary will contain an overview of the proposed project, including a list of required discretionary approvals. The summary will also include a summary of impacts and mitigation measures, known areas of controversy including issues raised by agencies and the public, and a summary of alternatives to the proposed project. Introduction. The introduction section of the EIR will define the purpose, scope, and legislative authority of the EIR, CEQA requirements, and other pertinent environmental rules and regulations. This section will also describe the EIR process, structure, and required contents, as well as its relationship to other potential responsible or trustee agencies. This section will include a description of land use and Specific Plan planning efforts completed to date. A summary table of comment letters received on the NOP will be included in this section, with notation about where the issue is addressed in the EIR. An overview of the EIR's format and content as well as processing requirements will also be provided in this introductory section. Project Description. Dudek will update/revise and incorporate the project description prepared under Task 1. A detailed description of all of the project components and site plan details will be included, as well as a description of short-term construction and long-term operational activities. The project description also includes a discussion of the intended uses of the EIR and a list of permits and approvals required to implement the project. BRE Specific Plan Environmental -__-'._1-'_.____- c '._,_ _ __.__ Proposal .,.�_mm.............�_"________------ .... ................,....... � � �. Documentation Pro osal Page 16 Agreement N Environmental Impact Analysis.. Each environmental impact section will include the following sections: o Environmental Setting o Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances o Thresholds of Significance o Regulatory and Specific Plan Requirements o Environmental Impact Analysis o Cumulative Impacts o Mitigation Measures o Significance After Mitigation o References The IS was anticipated to scope out the following topics from the EIR: agriculture and forestry resources, biological resources, mineral resources, and wildfire. Our approach to evaluating impacts related to the remaining topical chapters is summarized as follows. Aesthetics. The EIR will evaluate visual changes and potential impacts to scenic vistas and the visual character in the project vicinity that would occur as a result of project implementation. To support this analysis, architectural drawings (provided by the architect and/or Specific Plan graphics) will be included in the EIR section. Impacts to day and nighttime views will be informed by the potential for particularly reflective building materials to be introduced to the site and the introduction of new nighttime lighting sources, as per the requirements of the Specific Plan and applicable City regulations. It is assumed that the architect's visual renderings and concept aerial views will be adequate to visually depict the proposed project and that no additional visual simulations are required. Additionally, it is assumed that the building heights are not tall enough to result in shade -shadow impacts. Air Quality. Dudek will prepare an assessment of the air quality and GHG emissions impacts of the proposed project utilizing the significance thresholds in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD's) emissions -based thresholds, and the City's guidance, as applicable. After reviewing all available project materials, Dudek will prepare a request for any outstanding data needed to conduct the analysis. If precise information on a particular factor is not available from the City staff or its representatives, Dudek will make every effort to quantify these items using the best available information for comparable data sources. Local and regional climate, meteorology, and topography as they affect the accumulation or dispersal of air pollutants will be presented in the air quality assessment. Current air quality conditions and recent trends in the South Coast Air Basin, where the proposed project is located, will be described on the basis of California Air Resources Board and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency annual air quality monitoring data summaries. Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies responsible for air quality management will be identified, and applicable federal, state, and local air quality policies, regulations, and standards will be summarized, including a discussion of the SCAQMD Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. Dudek will estimate emissions associated with construction of the proposed project using the California Emissions Estimation Model (CalEEMod). The analysis of short-term construction and demolition emissions will be based on scheduling information (e.g., overall construction duration, phasing and phase timing) and probable construction activities (e.g., construction equipment type and quantity, workers, and haul trucks) developed by the City and/or standardized approaches. Dudek will then evaluate the significance of the emissions based on the SCAQMD significance criteria. For purposes of the budget, it was assumed a maximum of three construction CalEEMod runs and one operational build -out year CaIEEMod run will be performed. . BRE S Specific .._..,.,,_.,. .. �m ...............�,__.. r,,... ..........,. Plan Environmental ................ ...w,.,, p �m m metal Documentation Proposal Page 17 Agreement N Dudek will also assess the project's potential to cause or contribute to exceedances of ambient air quality standards at sensitive receptors near the proposed project activities using the SCAQMD's localized significance thresholds. For projects with a total site area of 5 acres or less, the assessment may use a simple "lookup table" approach provided by the SCAQMD. For budgetary purposes, it is assumed that the maximum daily area of disturbance will not exceed 5 acres for each area; therefore, the localized significance threshold assessment will use the lookup table approach provided by the SCAQMD and the construction emission estimates from CalEEMod. For purposes of the budget, it was assumed that a localized significance threshold assessment will be conducted for each of the three areas. Dudek understands that the project is proposing future sensitive receptors (i.e., residences) and the project site is close to sensitive receptors (existing residences); thus, a health risk assessment may be warranted. Therefore, Dudek included a construction health risk assessment to evaluate the impact of construction toxic air contaminants, specifically diesel particulate matter (DPM), on sensitive receptors. While there is no specific requirement to prepare this analysis, Dudek recommends inclusion of this analysis in the EIR. CalEEMod will also be used to estimate project -generated operational criteria air pollutant emissions associated with mobile, energy, and area sources. Dudek will estimate mobile source emissions using the trip generation rates and additional necessary trip characteristics provided in the traffic report prepared for the project. Energy and area source emissions (e.g., natural gas combustion and consumer products) will be estimated using the default values in CalEEMod for the proposed land use based on the number of residential units, the number of hotel rooms, and total proposed commercial square footage. In addition to operational emissions estimated for the proposed project, emissions associated with operation of the existing land uses will be estimated using CalEEMod default values for an appropriate land use surrogate. The existing emissions estimate will reflect basic operation of the existing land uses and associated vehicle trips. Dudek will estimate the net change in operational criteria air pollutant emissions and compare the net change to the SCAQMD emissions -based significance thresholds. Dudek will evaluate whether traffic associated with the proposed project could lead to potential exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial localized concentrations of air pollutant emissions, specifically carbon monoxide "hot spots." The qualitative assessment will be based on the traffic study prepared for the project and applicable screening criteria recommended by the SCAQMD and/or the Caltrans. For budgetary purposes, it is assumed that the study intersections would not exceed the applied screening criteria, and a quantitative carbon monoxide hotspots analysis would not be required. Dudek assumes that the project would not include operational stationary sources (e.g., diesel emergency generator) and an associated operational health risk assessment would not be required. If the project would include a stationary source, Dudek can evaluate the associated emissions and health risk under a separate scope and budget. Furthermore, since the proposed future sensitive receptors (i.e., residences) on the project site would be located approximately 2,000 feet south of Interstate 105 and approximately 8,000 feet west of Interstate 405, a health risk assessment to evaluate the potential health risk of freeway DPM emissions on the project is assumed to not be required and is not proposed herein. Furthermore, based on the Caltrans Traffic Census Program, the PCH has a traffic volume of 58,000 annual average daily trips northbound and 61,000 annual average daily trips southbound are less than the California Air Resources Board Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Respective recommended siting of sensitive land uses within 500 feet of freeways and urban roads with 100,000 vehicles per day. Nonetheless, if required, Dudek could prepare a roadway health risk assessment to comprehensively evaluate the project's potential to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations under a separate scope and budget. BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 18 Agreement N Additional Appendix G thresholds will also be evaluated, including the potential for the project to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, to result in other emissions such as odors, or to impede attainment of the 2016 SCAQMD air quality management plan. The EIR analysis will be prepared consistent with the SCAQMD's guidance and thresholds. Details of the analysis (e.g., daily criteria air pollutant emission calculations) will be included in an appendix to the EIR. Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources,. Dudek will incorporate the findings of Task 1.3, Cultural Resources Technical Report. It is anticipated that the City will conduct all required coordination to support AB 52 requirements related to Native American coordination, and Dudek will summarize the City's process in the tribal cultural resources section of the EIR. Energy. Dudek will prepare an energy assessment for the project per Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. The analysis will briefly summarize electricity, natural gas, and petroleum energy sources and the relevant regulatory framework. Based on Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the impact analysis will assess if the project would (1) result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation, and (2) conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. The project will be assessed in regards to construction and operational energy consumption, which will be quantified to the extent estimation methods and project -specifics are available. Project electricity (kilowatt-hours) and natural gas (British thermal units) usage will be estimated based on project specifics and CalEEMod default values, as appropriate, when project specifics are not available. Petroleum consumption will be estimated using CalEEMod and based on the same equipment and vehicle assumptions assumed in the air quality and GHG emissions analysis. As with the air quality and GHG emissions analyses, energy consumption will also be estimated for the existing land uses and the net change in petroleum, electricity, and natural gas consumption will be estimated. Project elements that would reduce the proposed project's energy demand during construction and operations will be identified in the analysis and quantified as available. Dudek assumes that the City staff or its representatives will provide a list of the project's energy conservation measures prior to initiating air quality and GHG emissions modeling, as the energy analysis will be prepared consistent with the emissions modeling assumptions. Geology and Soils„ This section will incorporate analysis and findings of the geotechnical investigation provided by the Applicant. Drawing upon the information and conclusions of the report, as well as additional available geologic maps and data (U.S. Geological Survey, California Geological Survey, and U.S. Department of Agriculture), Dudek will prepare an EIR section evaluating the potential for the project to result in impacts associated with geology and soils. No additional geological surveys or field investigations are proposed. As per CEQA guidelines, Dudek will complete a paleontological resources inventory. Dudek's qualified paleontologist will complete a records search through the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County to determine the location of any previously recorded fossil discoveries in the vicinity of the project. The records search provides information necessary to determine paleontological sensitivity of the project area. Dudek anticipates the direct costs for the records search to be no more than $300.00. Dudek will prepare a paleontological resources technical memorandum that will include all necessary information, including records search results, geological map and literature review, paleontological literature review, and provide recommendations for future management considerations or treatment. The paleontological resources technical memorandum will be included as an appendix in the EIR. It is assumed that any existing geotechnical and paleontological resource reports for the project will be provided to Dudek. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The GHG emissions assessment will include a setting and background discussion consisting of a summary of the greenhouse effect and global climate change, potential changes to the global climate system and to California, and emission inventories at the national, state, and local levels. It will also include a summary of the key federal, state, and local regulatory actions and programs to reduce GHG emissions. BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal tlyw 4 Page 19 Agreement N PYREK Dudek will estimate the GHG emissions associated with construction of the project using CaIEEMod based on the same construction and demolition scenario utilized in the air quality analysis. Project -generated operational GHG emissions that will be estimated include those associated with mobile sources, natural gas usage, electrical generation, water supply, wastewater, and solid waste disposal. The emissions estimates will be based on information provided by the City staff or CaIEEMod default values. In addition to operational emissions estimated for the proposed project, emissions associated with operation of the existing land uses will be estimated using CaIEEMod based on the same scenario utilized in the air quality analysis. The impact analysis will reflect Appendix G of the state CEQA Guidelines; specifically, whether a project would (a) generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment and (b) conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. The SCAQMD GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group has proposed options lead agencies can select from to screen thresholds of significance for GHG emissions in residential and commercial projects; however, no thresholds have been formally adopted. Options the SCAQMD evaluated include a bright -line threshold of 3,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year for all land use types. We will work with City staff to confirm application of the appropriate threshold for evaluating the project's GHG emissions under CEQA. Dudek will estimate the net change in operational GHG emissions and compare the net change to the appropriate SCAQMD threshold. Details of the analysis (e.g., annual GHG emission calculations) will be included in an appendix to the EIR. The City worked with the South Bay Cities Council of Governments to prepare and adopt a Climate Action Plan (December 2017); however, the City's Climate Action Plan is not a qualified plan under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5 and cannot be tiered from under environmental review. As such, Dudek will discuss how the proposed project complies with the City's Climate Action Plan measures for reducing GHG emissions; state regulations (AB 32); General Plan goals, objectives, and policies that help the City contribute to regional GHG reduction efforts; and applicable development standards that would increase energy efficiency, such as the California Building Code. Dudek will also provide a qualitative post -2020 analysis that will evaluate whether or not the project - generated GHG emissions would impede the attainment of the 2030 and 2050 reduction goals identified in SB 32 and Executive Order S-3-05, respectively. Because the City has not adopted a numeric post -2020 threshold or provided guidance for demonstrating that a project will not impede the implementation of state's post -2020 GHG reduction goals, a qualitative assessment is assumed to be sufficient. The EIR analysis will be prepared consistent with the SCAQMD's guidance and thresholds. Hazards and Hazardous Materials., This section will incorporate analysis and findings of the Phase I environmental site assessment or other hazards assessment provided by the Applicant. Drawing on the information and conclusions in the provided environmental site assessment, as well as additional available on government databases, Dudek will prepare an EIR section evaluatingthe potential for the project to result in impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials. Hydrology and Water Quaff. Based on the hydrology reports/analyses provided by the Applicant's civil engineer, Dudek will prepare the hydrology and water quality section of the EIR, which will (1) identify beneficial uses and water quality impairments (if any) of downstream surface water bodies, (2) describe existing groundwater quality conditions, (3) explain state and federal water quality regulations and the City's development standards (e.g., regarding drainage and erosion control, non-stormwater discharges, and grading), (4) discuss the various ways in which the project could adversely affect hydrology, drainage and water quality (both directly and indirectly), and (5) identify any best management practices or mitigation measures required. Dudek will summarize the hydrology analysis, which is anticipated to articulate how the project complies with the requirements of the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit requirements and the City's requirements, including best management practices to comply with the Low Impact Development mandates. BRE Specific Plan Environmental�on Pr _._._._.. Documentation Proposal Page 20 Agreement NPP (Land Use and Planning. The land use section of the EIR will describe the consistency of the proposed project with the City's General Plan goals and intents, and other adopted land use policies, including the Southern California Association of Governments' 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. The land use section will describe the compatibility and any potential conflicts between the proposed project with existing development. These conflicts could include a use that would create a nuisance for adjacent properties or result in incompatibility with surrounding land uses, noise levels, or traffic levels. The EIR will evaluate the extent to which development standards or proposed design standards would eliminate or minimize potential conflicts between the proposed project and adjacent uses. Noise. Dudek will conduct a noise study of potential impacts to existing and proposed future on-site land uses (i.e., residential, and retail commercial uses). Residential land uses are located to the west, and commercial uses are located to the east. These land uses could be impacted by noise from project -related demolition and construction and project -related traffic, and the proposed future residences could be impacted by traffic noise from the adjacent PCH/Sepulveda Boulevard, as well as noise from the proposed on-site parking structure, and from Los Angeles International Airport, located approximately 3,000 feet to the north. A field noise study will be conducted to measure existing on- and off-site noise conditions. Sound -level data will be collected over 10- to 15 -minute periods up to six on-site and nearby noise -sensitive receiver locations. Potential construction noise impacts on nearby noise -sensitive land uses will be evaluated based on construction equipment data to be provided by the project Applicant or from estimates for similar projects, and noise modeling methods developed by the Federal Highway Administration. On-site and off-site long-term (operational) noise effects from the existing, future and project -related vehicle trips along nearby arterials and PCH/Sepulveda Boulevard will be evaluated using the project's traffic study and the Federal Highway Administration's Traffic Noise Model version 2.5. Parking structure noise will be addressed using data from similar projects. Aircraft noise from Los Angeles International Airport will be assessed using the available noise contour information from Los Angeles World Airports. If noise impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be developed and recommended to reduce impacts to a "less -than -significant" level and to comply with City noise standards. The significance of noise impacts will be assessed based on the relevant City, state, and federal thresholds. If significant noise impacts are identified, mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a less than significant level (where feasible) will be recommended. The regulatory background, ambient noise environment, methodology, results of the noise analysis, findings of potential effects and mitigation measures will be summarized in the noise section of the project's EIR noise section. Population and Housing. The project would lead to an increase the number of employees and residents at the project site that could alter the population, employment, and housing characteristics for the area through a change in land uses and an increase in the number of residents and jobs available on site. The employment and housing characteristics of the City and region will be summarized and will be used to determine potential project impacts. Applicable General Plan policies regarding population, housing, and employment opportunities will also be described and analyzed. Public Services and Recreation. These sections will address potential impacts of the project on police and fire department response capabilities and time resulting from construction of the new residential and commercial uses. This analysis will provide a qualitative existing condition assessment of fire protection, police protection, emergency medical service, schools, parks, and libraries. The estimates of existing uses for these public services will become the basis for future projected needs. Development of these estimates may necessitate outreach to the fire department, police department, or use of local emergency response data. The EIR will also address proper BRE Document Environmentalecific Plan S ...�....�ation Proposal�_...................................��_.,._._��.�.___..�.......�_..__..,_..�..._.,.�.�....,.._....�_ Specific Page 21 Agreement NOD site access and circulation and fire prevention devices and systems that would be installed. Impacts on recreational facilities, schools, and libraries will also be analyzed. Potential impacts to public services will be substantiated and analyzed in the EIR. Transportation. Dudek will incorporate the analysis and findings of the Applicant's traffic impact report into the EIR, which is assumed to adequately address all transportation -related issues associated with the project and with development on the PCH. Utilities and Service Systems. This section of the EIR will evaluate the potential for the project to affect water, wastewater, stormwater, and solid waste services. It is assumed that an infrastructure capacity analysis will be provided through the Specific Plan to confirm that the off-site pipelines and infrastructure can accommodate the demands of the proposed project. This section will address whether the wastewater generated by the project would require the expansion of existing wastewater treatment facilities or the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities, and whether existing or planned stormwater drainage systems are adequate. Dudek will also provide projections of solid waste generation, which will be compared to existing and future landfill capacity to determine whether the changes in land use would substantially shorten the life of the landfill or necessitate expansion of the landfill. The project includes development of approximately 273 residential units and approximately 15,000 square feet of commercial use. Dudek anticipates that the proposed project does not the requirements to prepare a Water Supply Assessment in accordance with the requirements of SB 610. As such, Dudek will answer the CEQA threshold question of whether there would be "sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years." The analysis will document the following: (1) current water demand for the project site and projected water demand for the proposed project; (2) projected water demands for the proposed project through buildout in 5 -year increments; (3) identification of existing water supply entitlements, water rights, water service contracts, or agreements relevant to the identified water supplies and proposed development scenario; and (4) water received at the project site in prior years pursuant to those entitlements, rights, contracts, and agreements. The analysis will evaluate the availability of the identified water supplies during normal, single -dry year, and multiple -dry water years during, at minimum, a 20 -year projection to meet existing demands, expected demands of the project, and reasonably foreseeable planned future water demands for the project, thereby, assessing the reliability and sufficiency of water supplies as required. If necessary, mitigation measures will be provided. Alternatives to the Proposed Project. The alternatives section will be prepared to meet the objectives of the CEQA Guidelines by addressing alternatives to the project as proposed. Each alternative will be evaluated with respect to the environmental issue area reviewed for the proposed project. As required by the CEQA Guidelines, the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative and the reasons for rejecting or recommending it will be provided. The environmentally superior alternative will be identified from among the alternatives to the proposed project. In addition, a narrative will be provided that discusses alternatives that were considered but were determined to be infeasible, and therefore not assessed in detail. For purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that three alternatives will carried forward for analysis evaluated in the EIR. Long -Term Implications of the Proposed Project. This section will include analysis of significant irreversible changes that would occur as result of the proposed project, as well as growth -inducing impacts. It will also include a summary of the effects determined not to be significant, including those topics that were scoped out through the IS. List of Preparers. This section will include references, acronyms and abbreviations, and the preparers of the EIR. BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 22 Agreement NP Appendices. The draft EIR appendices will include the NOP and IS, NOP responses, and the various technical reports and memoranda described. Upon receipt of comments on the first draft EIR, Dudek will revise the document accordingly by addressing all comments received. Dudek will submit the revised draft EIR for review and comment in a track -change format to confirm that all comments/questions were addressed appropriately. Upon receipt of comments on the revised draft EIR, Dudek will revise the document accordingly by addressing all comments received. Dudek will prepare the proof check draft EIR for final review and approval to reproduce. It is assumed that comments on the revised draft EIR will be minor and not require new analyses or substantive revisions. Dudek will reproduce and distribute the Notice of Availability (NOA) to interested stakeholders, agencies, and the public based on the NOP mailing list, which will be revised to include respondents to the NOP. Dudek will prepare drafts of both the NOA and the NOC for review. Upon receipt of comments, Dudek will finalize these documents for City signature and distribution. Dudek will be responsible for providing the NOC to the State Clearinghouse along with the 15 copies of the executive summary. Dudek will also be responsible for posting the NOA with the Los Angeles County Clerk. In the event the City would like to publish the NOA in a paper of local circulation, Dudek assumes the City will take the lead on posting the notice with the paper and that the Applicant would post the notice on the project site, if needed. Task 3 Deliverables: • First draft EIR: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF) • Revised draft EIR: one electronic copy (MS Word in track -change and PDF) • Proof check draft EIR: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF) for approval to print • Draft EIR: one unbound camera-ready hardcopy; 10 bound hardcopies (appendices on CD); 30 CDs or thumb drives • Draft and final NOC and 15 copies and mailing to State Clearinghouse • Draft and final NOA: one electronic copy (MS Word); 100 hard copies for City mail out; filing with Los Angeles County Clerk Task 4 Preparation of Final EIR Upon completion of the 45 -day public review period, Dudek will prepare a final EIR, including the following chapters: response to comments, clarifications to the draft EIR, and mitigation monitoring and reporting plan (MMRP). A CD containing the draft EIR and technical appendices will be affixed to the back cover of each hard copy final EIR. The response to comments chapter will include comments received on the draft EIR, responses to those comments, and standard introductory material. All comments will be numbered (to indicate comment letter and comment number), and the responses to those comments will be similarly numbered to allow easy correlation. For purposes of this scope of work and cost estimate, Dudek assumes up to 90 hours of professional staff time to address the comment letters. Since the actual scope and extent of public comments (in either written or oral format) cannot be known at this time, if additional staff hours are needed to prepare responses to comments, a budget augment will be requested. .............. _� .. __......_...._...._..__ w...,........�...... BRE.......M..._....._.................................... ,. SpecificPlan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 23 Agreement N If necessary, Dudek will prepare a clarifications to the draft EIR chapter that will identify any instances where revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary. In this chapter, deleted text will be indicated by strikeout and inserted text by double underline. The MMRP will be in table format and will specify project -specific mitigation measures that are applicable to the project. Mitigation timing and responsible parties will also be identified. Upon receipt of comments, Dudek revise the response to comments, clarifications to the draft EIR, and MMRP accordingly. Dudek will provide a proof check document for approval to reproduce. A total of 30 hours of professional staff time has been assumed for this task. Dudek will assist the City with providing the final EIR at least 10 days prior to consideration for certification by the City to any commenting public agency and any member of the public who has requested the document. Task 4 Deliverables: • Draft responses to comments, clarifications, and MMRP: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF) • Proof check of final responses to comments, clarifications, and MMRP: one electronic copy (MS in track - change Word and PDF) • Final EIR: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF); one unbound camera-ready hardcopy; 10 bound hardcopies; 30 CDs or thumb drives Dudek will prepare draft findings of fact for each significant effect identified in the final EIR and prepare a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) if unavoidable significant impacts are identified. As required by the CEQA Guidelines, one of three findings must be made for each significant effect and must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The SOC will rely on input from the project team regarding the benefits of the project. Upon receipt of comments, Dudek revise the findings and SOC accordingly. Dudek will provide a proof check document for approval to reproduce. Upon approval, Dudek will prepare the final findings and SOC. Once the EIR has been certified, Dudek will prepare an NOD and assist the City with filing the NOD with the State Clearinghouse and Los Angeles County Clerk. This task includes the cost of filing the California Department of Fish and Wildlife fees. Task 5 Deliverables • Draft findings and SOC: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF) • Proof check of findings and SOC: one electronic copy (MS Word in track -change and PDF) • Final findings and SOC: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF); one unbound camera-ready hardcopy; 10 bound hardcopies; 30 CDs or thumb drives. • Draft and final NOD submitted to the County Clerk and NOC State Clearinghouse and California Department of Fish and Wildlife filing fees Task 6 Project Meetings and Coordination 1, This task includes attendance at meetings and hearings, as needed throughout the CEQA process. Meetings may be attended by the project manager and other senior specialists. Dudek assumes 40 hours for project manager time to attend up to four in-person status meetings and up to two hearings before the City decision makers in support of EIR certification. The allocated hours could be distributed among Dudek's senior specialists, as appropriate. Meeting minutes and decisions will be tracked and documented for each status meeting. This task does not include time for attendance at the public outreach meetings associated with the Specific Plan process. RE Specific Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 24 Agreement N P The project manager will maintain regular contact with the project team and the City, as needed, throughout the CEQA process. Activities include regularly scheduled conference calls, including a twice -monthly project team conference call. Dudek will be responsible for managing the CEQA process, including communications and coordination among various consultants to facilitate adherence to the EIR schedule; compliance with the scope of work and budget; and internal administrative tasks such as invoicing and contract management. The project management budget assumes a 16 -month EIR schedule. Dudek can only ensure compliance with schedule milestones that are fully under our control (e.g., preparation of work products). If this schedule is extended, additional project management budget may be necessary. Task 6 Deliverables: • Up to 40 hours of project manager meeting time, anticipated to include up to four in-person status meetings and up to two hearings before the City decision makers • Project management time over the course of the CEQA process, assuming a 16 -month schedule Task 7 Optional Tasks During construction, the primary toxic air contaminant of concern would be DPM from heavy-duty trucks and any on-site off-road equipment. Dudek will use the American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model (AERMOD), which is required by the SCAQMD to conduct dispersion modeling, and California Air Resources Board's Hot Spots Analysis and Reporting Program Version 2 (HARP2) to calculate the health impacts. Notably, the health impact calculations in HARP2 are based on the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment's 2015 Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines - Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. The dispersion of DPM and associated health risk impacts on sensitive receptors will be determined using AERMOD, HARP2, local meteorological data obtained from the SCAQMD, and the estimated annual average DPM emissions. The maximum cancer risks at the appropriate receptors (e.g., proximate residential receptors) will be tabulated. Cancer risk isopleths (i.e., lines of equal cancer risk) will be plotted on figures showing the project site if the maximum cancer risk exceeds the SCAQMD significance threshold of 10 in one million. The assessment will also include the estimated chronic (long-term) hazard indices due to non -cancer health effects associated with DPM. The hazard indices will be tabulated at the appropriate locations and plotted on figures similar to that showing estimated cancer risks if they exceed the SCAQMD significance threshold of 1.0. The cancer burden of the project will also be evaluated if the cancer risk exceeds one in one million. If the health impacts exceed the thresholds of significance, we will suggest appropriate mitigation measures to reduce the health impacts. A summary of the methodology and results will be provided in the air quality section of the EIR and details of the analysis will be included in an appendix to the EIR. BRE S...ecific Plan �.�....�.�,��. ..... ........ ,.....µ_...._ p an Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 25 Agreement N INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK .._,...._ . _.._........_. _µ�,,,,-. - — ....... I �RE � �peffi�Plan Environmental Documentation Proposal Page 26 Project Schedule Agreement No. 5757 The proposed schedule for completion of the BRE Specific Plan Project EIR includes 16 months from the initiation meeting to filing of the NOD. Dudek understands the importance of meeting the schedule outlined in Table 1 on the following page and has confirmed technical staff availability to meet this schedule, assuming that adequate information regarding the project and a mutually acceptable scope of services is available upon issuance of the notice to proceed. Other factors that could lengthen or shorten the schedule include dates of receipt of project -related information, length of City review, and unanticipated issues arising from City staff or public review of the EIR. The schedule includes the following specific assumptions. • Receipt of complete and accurate project data at the EIR kickoff meeting + Receipt of complete and accurate technical studies and plans at the kickoff meeting • City -review periods consistent with the assumptions set forth in Table 1 • Comprehensive comments provided by the City with no conflicting direction • Stable project description throughout the environmental review process BRE Specific Plan Environmental Documenttatiati. , . .. _w T._....M._.......,,. � � .... on Proposal Page 27 I . . .. ...... . . OMMI OMOWL OMWL OZOUWA T Onv= OUMUS A 090M WOiIUO COMM OMMW9 amm, 77 OMMUP OzwMp .z OZOLWC . . . ....... . p— LIM I i ....... . ....... euweua SOEMS c WMA LE kms" OWAM Ui 0ov" 21 4 C5 t (D .......... . SMUL ewvrLs GMLWO Glows . . . ....... . p— LIM I i Agreement No. 5757 00 ....... . ....... Agreement No. 5757 00 c LE 0, Ui 21 4 C5 t Agreement No. 5757 00 Agreement No. 5757 9N N O O ti � � O N ^ UO) N O 000 a N 01 07 r W M Y o Y H f0 W NNLO11 N W H U N � m Da ti L O O O 5 a m c m � t4 � w en a Y 5 to 0 0 o o U) m o co w o v N CO 5 ai r Ld 06 ti ai > N a) b4 bN4 64 fA (A -A a O n E y LL o li N O M r P a N ci a 1n ci c � 3 L b0 > 3L aPN 'µ m p N U d VUl MM O.,.,."...... ................,. .,... L � f0 i N 6 i. c0 et N c0 N N m p a7 cy CD 3 VIII m a) a ..........._-- ..............................—. ............. .,...._..-._...�,._ a a N �p O G C Y N•� LO - "wii O � '� I � � co C � :illi N N N N= L O N W mm c a E .._..,._......,.._.,._.-, ........ _ > m d � N .� `O •� !V !Id � I p N - E c > C O C N al U O N p O _9oi N E C n P O N 46 >� h 3 r ro Om v a Ln .�........M n N O ?� n E O Y m L vOi 'a o. b0 � � N N cNi c0 M W ID t E" o n o pM � a+ N E a E N J O' a) N o O m 0 L° in m y � w O 53;-N N a) a M 0- O M M1: I ii s a c UIN 4" ym 0 m G -0L 46 m� z � tYil o w r"w...✓' m v m c c O `Jle� v m 3 0 e F- c o .. a E tO g w m aci U z m ,K x" •o c o cr m ani o w o a m m M W O L m C ¢ ¢ Q U U N N Q7 c -I Q O �- N N O 'c C14C M c cY7 U N CA. L ¢ �— N �uJ w w • w e a) -O svl ciM N J -I M N 0 OU :C O 0 0 0 U n ci N W 0 G i' p c4 0 c4 fn .- H H C M H= M M X F L F' m o U 3 Agreement No. 5757 Cl) MN �MoELq tO+4 MO rn�a0mU) O 00 UA M m CQ m CL N " 9 o000 6i 4% M co4 0 N ty M 0 ° W W M L 0 0 Q C N O NCN cri M to y3 ER y� ie- ff +g vi 64 N m M W m a v v Agreement No. 5757 Appendix A Resumes Agreement No. 5757 Kristin Starbird Project Manager Kristin Starbird is a senior project manager with 16 years' experience in the management and preparation of environmental documents pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)/National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Ms. Starbird is responsible for managing the environmental documentation and review process, schedules, and budgets for a wide variety of controversial and complex public- and private -sector projects, including general, master, and ;ement No. 5757 University of Texas, Austin MA, Public Affairs BA, Social Work Al%tions Association of Environmental Professionals specific plans; flood control and water infrastructure projects; recreational and park projects; residential tract map developments; mixed-use and transit -oriented developments; solar energy projects; and institutional facilities. She confidently represents her clients in public meetings and hearings, and applies her commitment to exceptional client service and strategic consultation on all projects. Project Experience Centennial Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Los Angeles County, California. Served as project manager for the EIR for a new community with residential, commercial, business park, recreational/entertainment, water/wastewater utilities, park/open space, and institutional/civic uses. The project would allow up to 19,333 dwelling units; 7.4 million square feet (msf) of Business Park uses (office, research and development, and warehousing or light manufacturing uses); 1 msf of Commercial uses; 1.6 msf of Institutional/Civic land uses; fire stations and a sheriff's station; and two wastewater reclamation facilities that will generate recycled water. The undeveloped site includes numerous biological resources and jurisdictional drainages, as well as tribal cultural resources requiring preservation. The primary entitlement actions include the adoption of a Specific Plan, Zone Change, General Plan Amendment, Development Agreement, Tentative Parcel Map, and Conditional Use Permits. Project buildout would be implemented in phases based on future market conditions over an approximate 20 -year period through a series of future tract and parcel maps, and would be developed in coordination with the planned improvements of the Caltrans Northwest 138 Improvement Project. Elysian Park Lofts Environmental Impact Report, Los Angeles, California. Served as principal in charge and project manager for the EIR for a 2 to 14 -story mixed-use project on an 8 -acre parcel with approximately 920 residential units and approximately 21,000 square feet of neighborhood -serving retail uses leasing offices. The project site is located in the Central City North Community Plan Area near the Metro Gold Line and the Los Angeles State Historic Park. The transit -oriented development project is proximate to a network of regional transportation facilities, including the Chinatown Metro Station and is in a transit priority area. The site includes a remnant portion of the historic Zanja Madre and is located in a Methane Zone. The project requires a General Plan Amendment and zone change, site plan review, vesting tentative tract map, and development agreement. Aviation Station Transit -Oriented Development Project EIR, Los Angeles County, California. Served as project manager for the EIR for a mixed-use, transit -oriented project on 5.9 acres within unincorporated Los Angeles County and the City of Los Angeles. The project involved the demolition of existing homes and commercial uses and the construction of an urban mixed-use development with 29,500 square feet of ground -floor commercial and 390 multi -family units. The project also required relocation of a Metro bus terminal and use of Caltrans Page 1 Agreement N District 7 property, and required the de -annexation of property from the City of Los Angeles. Project entitlements included a General Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Zone Change, and approvals from the Airport Land Use Commission and the Local Agency Formation Commission for the County of Los Angeles. Fullerton Transportation Center Specific Plan Project EIR, Fullerton, California. Served as project manager for the EIR for a mixed-use redevelopment specific plan project in the 35 -acre Fullerton Transportation Center site located within and adjacent to the City of Fullerton's Central Business District. The Specific Plan included a form - based code that allows for the development of up to 1,500 residential units and 100,000 square feet of retail and office uses, as well as improvements to the existing circulation system to form a cohesive network that provides access and mobility for motorists, transit riders, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Beach and Orangethorpe Mixed -Use Specific Plan Project EIR, Buena Park, California. Served as project manager for the Program EIR for this project, currently called "The Source", located along the Beach Boulevard Entertainment Zone in Buena Park. The Specific Plan allowed for a flexible and phased development plan on the 12.5 -acre site for an urban mixed-use project with a maximum of 1,000 multi -family units in multiple high-rise structures; 355,000 square feet of retail; a 300-room/270,000-square-foot hotel, and multiple levels of subterranean parking. The site redevelopment would require the demolition of existing single-family residences and commercial properties. Triunfo Creek Vineyards Project Initial Study (IS)/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), County of Los Angeles, California. Served as principal in charge and project manager for the initial study (IS)/MND at the Triunfo Creek Vineyards site, which hosts various special events throughout the year, including weddings, private, and corporate events. The project proposes three separate spaces within the 55 acres: an expanded outdoor area for special events; two wine tasting bars; and a winery facility for processing grapes into wine and hosting smaller events/tastings. The Project would allow for increased outdoor amplified music and events. The project site is located within a Significant Ecological Area and Triunfo Creek, and is adjacent to noise sensitive single-family residential homes and equestrian estate properties. St. Michael's Abbey Relocation EIR, Orange County, California. Served as project manager for the EIR for the development of a campus for the monastery church and private preparatory monastery school on an undeveloped 124 -acre site in Silverado Canyon. The project included a monastery for up to 85 Fathers; a church to accommodate up to 500 visitors; a high school for up to 100 students; a convent for up to 12 nuns; guest cottages for up to 12 visitors; a chapel/cemetery; outdoor athletic fields; and agricultural/maintenance buildings. The EIR evaluated the impacts associated with large special events, including Christmas, Easter Mass, and graduation. 57 Wheeler Avenue Mixed -Use Project IS/MND, Arcadia, California. Served as principal in charge and project manager for the IS/MND for the development of a downtown mixed-use, 4 -story structure with 38 residential units, 16,175 square feet of commercial, a public plaza, and a subterranean parking garage. The project site is one block south of the Metro Gold Line Station, allowing the project to support the City's goal of developing a transit -oriented downtown community. The project required demolition of a surface parking lot and a building, which was evaluated for historic significance. Camp Vernon Kilpatrick Replacement Project IS/MND, Los Angeles County, Calffornia. Served as project manager for the preparation of an IS/MND for the redevelopment of a juvenile residential treatment camp operated by the Los Angeles County Probation Department. The project would demolish most existing structures and outdoor facilities at the camp and construct a replacement camp with similar buildings, outdoor facilities, and hardscape and landscape features. It would also include increased surface parking that would accommodate up to 120 detainee occupants. This project involved extensive coordination with the County team on defining the project parameters and strategy for the IS/MND to best accommodate the County's design -build approach. Page 2 Sabrina Alonso Environmental Analyst -eement No. 5757 Sabrina Alonso is an environmental analyst with a background in Education ecology. Ms. Alonso focuses on the preparation of California University of California, Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents such as initial studies Santa Barbara (ISs), mitigated negative declarations (MNDs), and environmental BS, Environmental Studies impact reports (EIRs). She works with clients to collect data, perform ProfessidnalA ffiliations research, and assist in report preparation. American Planning Association Association of Environmental Professionals Euclid and Broadway Residential Project, City of Anaheim, California. Served as analyst responsible for the research and preparation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the proposed 39 -unit residential project located in the City of Anaheim. The project involves demolition of existing office, commercial, and restaurant buildings, and construction of a 39 -unit residential project. The project is in a developed part of Anaheim with mixed land use around the site. Pacific Freeway Center EIR, City of Fontana, California. Assisted with the preparation of an EIR assessing the potentially significant environmental impacts of the Pacific Freeway enter Project. The project includes construction and operation of two warehouse buildings with associated office spaces, surface parking, and loading areas. The project takes place in the City of Fontana and seeks to repurpose the underutilized infill property in a manner that is consistent with the City General Plan and Zoning Code. Addendum to Citrus Commerce Park EIR, City of Fontana, California. Served as environmental analyst for the Duke Fontana Warehouse Project proposing construction and operation of one warehouse building, landscaping, loading docks, and vehicle and truck parking. NEC 10 Pepper Project, City of Colton, California. Served as analyst responsible for the research and preparation of the Addendum to Colton's Hub City Centre Specific Plan EIR for the NEC 10 Pepper Project. The project involved construction of three restaurant/retail use buildings and outdoor dining areas totaling 14,430 square feet, along with associated on-site and adjacent off-site improvements, such as parking and landscape setbacks. Oakmont Kadota Warehouse Project, City of Montclair, California. Completed an IS/MND for the construction of an approximately 139,000 -square -foot, one-story warehouse building. Authored the IS/MND and coordinated with technical specialists. Birch Specific Plan, City of Carson, California. Composed an IS/MND for the proposed four-story, 32 -unit condominium project in Carson. The Specific Plan resulted in a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Conditional Use Permit, and Design Overlay Review. Millikan Congregate Care Facility, City of Irvine, California. Served as analyst responsible for the research and preparation of the Addendum for the Millikan Congregate Care Facility project. The proposed project includes a 424,113 -square -foot congregate care facility consisting of 230 independent living quarters, 110 assisted living quarters, and 30 memory care rooms. Page 1 Agreement NP City Yards Master Plan EIR, City of Santa Monica, California. Currently serving as lead environmental analyst for the preparation of the EIR for the City of Santa Monica City Yards Master Plan Project. The project involves reconstruction of the 14.7 -acre facility known as City Yards. The Master Plan elements include reconstruction and demolition of existing buildings, improved circulation, and construction of a shared parking facility. The project is within an industrial use zone in the City of Santa Monica across from the Bergamot Station. Authored numerous EIR sections, including cultural, land use and planning, utilities, construction, and neighborhood effects. Aliso Viejo Ranch Project, City of Aliso Viejo, California. Served as environmental analyst for the project, which proposed to designate a property representing remnants of the 22,000 -acre Moulton Niguel Ranch and associated historic structures as a public park. Assisted with the production of an IS/MND and coordination with technical specialists. La Mirada Creek Park Master Plan, City of La Mirada, California. Assisted in the preparation of IS/MND for the project. The project involves rehabilitation and naturalization of the existing La Mirada Creek Park through implementation of the La Mirada Creek Park Master Plan. Tasks included preparing the IS/MND, coordinating with the Master Plan design team and technical specialists. Fullerton College Master Plan Program EIR, North Orange County Community College District, Cypress, California. Assisted in the preparation of the EIR for the Fullerton College Facilities Master Plan Program EIR involving the demolition of certain existing buildings, the renovation of existing buildings, and the construction and eventual operation of new campus facilities. The project would involve demolition of 178, 487 gross square feet (GSF) of existing buildings and approximately 536,827 GSF of new academic, auxiliary, general administrative, and recreational uses. Stormwater Capture Project, County of Los Angeles Sanitation District No. 2, Whittier, California. Composed a Negative Declaration for the implementation of a stormwater capture system at the Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility in Whittier to meet the State Water Resources Control Board's Industrial General Permit industrial stormwater requirements. The new stormwater system involved installation of new stormwater lift stations and stormwater tanks, construction of an earthen, unlined stormwater capture basin, and new utility connections. Page 2 yeement No. 5757 Jennifer Reed Air Quality Specialist, Environmental Planner Jennifer Reed is an air quality specialist/environmental planner with 12 EdOcation years' experience. Ms. Reed leads Dudek's air quality services team, and University of California, has been responsible for the management, research, and analysis of Santa Barbara projects subject to compliance with the California Environmental Quality BA, Environmental Studies Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). She has BA, Geography completed numerous environmental documents in support of a diverse ProfessionalAffiliations range of public and private developments. Ms. Reed specializes in air Association of Environmental quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions technical analyses, and Professionals continues to be on the forefront of evolving science, emissions modeling Air and Waste Management Association computer programs, and regulatory framework. Ms. Reed has prepared air quality and GHG assessments for a wide variety of development projects throughout California, including large residential projects, commercial and retail projects, industrial projects, mixed-use developments, colleges and universities, healthcare facilities, energy projects, water and wastewater infrastructure, and transportation improvements, including California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) air quality analyses. Additionally, she has considerable experience in project planning and regulatory compliance pursuant to the California Coastal Act (CCA) and has experience in project management, land -use permit processing, constraints analysis, development feasibility studies, due diligence investigations, and various other land -use planning projects. Project Experience Grapevine Project, Tejon Ranch Corporation, Kern County, California. Prepared the air quality and GHG emissions technical report for the project, provided management of the HRA and criteria pollutant air quality impact analysis, and provided ongoing technical support. The Grapevine Specific Plan project, which is located in the west -central portion of 270,000 -acre Tejon Ranch, would be developed as a residential community and employment center within 4,780 acres of the 8,010 -acre property. The project, which includes up to 12,000 residential units and 5.1 million square feet of commercial and light industrial land uses (including a community college and medical campus), is designed as a series of conveniently located village centers, each composed of a mix of housing, neighborhood -serving retail and office uses, schools, parks, and community services. Specific tasks include construction and operational criteria air pollutant and GHG emissions estimates, industrial source emissions calculations, carbon monoxide (CO) hotspot analysis, odor assessment, Valley Fever assessment, and other air quality topics. Montclair Plaza Expansion CEQA Review, Best, Best and Krieger LLP, Montclair, California. Contributed to the air quality and GHG sections for a proposed commercial infill redevelopment project in the city of Montclair. The project proposes redevelopment and expansion of Montclair Plaza, an indoor, two-story shopping mall that opened in 1968 and was last renovated in 2008. The applicant's goal is to revitalize and increase the gross leasable area of the current shopping center site for greater walkability and a more upscale shopping experience. Page 1 Agreement NP 635 South Citrus Avenue Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), Best, Best and Krieger LLP, Covina, California. Prepared the air quality and GHG emissions analysis for the proposed commercial infill redevelopment project in the city of Covina. The project consists of redeveloping an automobile rental facility into an automobile dealership, with the overall purpose of revitalizing a partially vacant, aging commercial building to allow for an updated commercial use. Jurupa Business Park Project Addendum, City of Fontana, California. Prepared the GHG report for an addendum to the Final EIR for the Jurupa Business Park project. The addendum was prepared to clarify minor changes to the Final EIR, which analyzed the development of three distribution/manufacturing buildings for various industrial and commercial uses, totaling 1,277,728 square feet of gross building area. Solana Torrance Air Quality/GHG Report, Reylenn Properties LLC, Torrance, California. Managed and prepared the technical report that analyzed potential impacts associated with development of a 300 -unit multifamily residential development, which includes three-, four-, and five -story residential structures constructed over a parking garage and associated amenities. The analysis included a construction HRA to evaluate cancer and non -cancer risk associated with project -generated diesel particulate matter (DPM). Valor Academy Expansion IS/MND, Los Angeles, California. Prepared the air quality and GHG assessment and provided technical support for noise and traffic impact analysis. Valor Academy, a private school located in the Arleta community of Los Angeles, is proposing to incrementally increase its enrollment from 200 to 480 students, establish modular classrooms on the property until construction of new classroom and administration buildings are complete, and construct a new surface parking lot over four phases of development. Malibu Parks Public Access Enhancement Plan, Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority, Los Angeles County, California. Contributed to the air quality, noise, traffic and parking, and GHG sections of the EIR, which analyzes impacts associated with implementation of a comprehensive plan, consisting of a public works plan and City of Malibu Local Coastal Program (LCP) Amendment, to address park and recreational facility program needs for state-owned parklands. Yokohl Ranch Environmental Impact Report (EIR), The Yokohl Ranch Company LLC, Visalia, California. Contributed to the preparation of the air quality and GHG sections of the draft EIR for the proposed Yokohl Ranch project and provided peer review of the air quality impact assessment prepared by the applicant's air quality consultants to ensure consistency with CEQA guidance. The current project proposes development of up to 10,000 dwelling units as well as mixed-use, neighborhood commercial, commercial recreation, schools, parks, and light industrial land uses within three planning areas totaling 6,572 acres of the 36,219 -acre project site. Casden Development Projects EIR, City of Oxnard, California. As deputy project manager and lead environmental analyst, oversaw and contributed to the air quality, land use and planning, public services, long-term impacts, and alternatives sections of the EIR. This project includes the development of two adjacent project sites, resulting in a total of 344 residential units. Lakeview Promenade Mixed -Use Project EIR, City of Santa Maria, California. Served as deputy project manager and lead environmental analyst. Oversaw and contributed to the air quality, transportation, hazardous materials and hazards, utilities, growth -inducing impacts, and alternatives sections of the EIR, which assessed the impacts of 270 multifamily residential units, 40,000 square feet of retail space, 15,000 square feet of restaurant space, 14,000 square feet of medical office space, and 1,500 square feet of professional space. Page 2 Michael Williams, PhD Cultural Resources Dr. Michael Williams is a paleontologist and crossed -trained archaeological field technician with more than 14 years' experience with fieldwork, fossil vertebrate specimen processing, and writing of reports for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE). Dr. Williams has project experience in all aspects of paleontological mitigation, including Phase I preconstruction surveys and report preparation and writing paleontological mitigation plans, initial studies (ISs)/mitigated negative declarations, and environmental impact reports (EIRs). He also has experience attending pre -grade meetings; preparing and presenting on- site Worker Environmental Awareness Programs (WEAPs); monitoring for 5/41171M= ement No. 5757 Louisiana State University PhD, Geology and Geophysics BS, Zoology Certifications Qualified Paleontologist; Orange, Ri4ersi�J,,s °° a.a Diego vnties B1 "l s.ahornO R s , . ,, , t,, P-Tmil f ofessionalAffiliations Society of Vertebrate Paleontology paleontological resources and supervising paleontoloical monitoring; coordinating spot checks and monitoring with construction superintendents and foremen; collecting and processing sediments for vertebrate microfossils, writing final monitoring reports; and accessioning fossils to the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County Museum and the Cooper Center in Orange County. Mr. Williams has California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and private company paleontological mitigation experience in San Diego, Imperial, Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, Kern, Inyo, Fresno, San Francisco, and Alameda counties. In addition, he has worked as a cross -trained archaeological surveyor and monitor on several field projects. Project Experience Pacific Palisades Village 1 CAH Acquisitions Co. LLC, Los Angeles, California. Presented the paleontological WEAP, provided senior paleontological support of paleontological monitors, and assisted in writing the final monitoring report. Vista Del Mar Project, VD Pacific Terrace LLC, Oceanside, California. Co -wrote the Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program and spot-checked project site for paleontological resources. Interim Ranch -Wide Management Plan, Tejon Ranch Corporation, Kern County, California. Presented the WEAP and provided senior paleontological support to field monitors. Entitlement Contract, W Orion PacficVistta LLC, vista, California. Drafted the paleontological resources section of the EIR. Kettner Lofts, CVCM Kettner 106 LLC, San Diego, California. Provided paleontological monitoring. Solana Highlands Multifamily Development, City of Solana Beach, California. Provided information for Draft EIR. Double D Mine Project, Mitchell Chadwick, Blythe, California. Co -wrote the paleontological resources survey report. Fullerton College Master Plan Program EIR, North Orange County Community College District, Cypress, California. Conducted paleontological resources survey and wrote the paleontological resources survey report. Page 1 Agreement N Chapman University Packinghouse EIR, Orange County, Califomia. Requested paleontological records search from the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and drafted paleontological resources section for the EIR. Specialty Medical Office Building, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc., Irwindale, California. Served as paleontological field lead. Co -wrote the Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program, performed spot-check monitoring, supervision of paleontological monitors, and co -wrote the final paleontological monitoring report. Biology and Cultural Resource Review for Mapleton Park Centre Site Land Purchase, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc., Murrieta, California. Wrote the final paleontological monitoring report. Machado Lake Pipeline Project, City of Los Angeles, California. Served as paleontological field lead. Monitored and supervised monitoring for archaeological and paleontological resources and co -wrote the final monitoring report. Van Norman Reservoir Well Drilling Project, City of Los Angeles, California. Served as paleontological field lead. Monitored and supervised monitoring for archaeological and paleontological resources and co -wrote the final monitoring report. City Truck Line South -Unit 4, City of Los Angeles, California. Served as paleontological field lead. Monitored and supervised monitoringfor paleontological resources. Dairy Fork Wetlands, City ofAliso Viejo, California. Conducted archaeological resources monitoring. As -Needed Environmental Services, City of San Diego, California. Conducted paleontological monitoring and wrote the final paleontological monitoring report. San Diego Association of Govemments (SANDAG) Continuing Services Agreement, AECOM Technical Services, California. Assisted with review of monitoring field logs. As -Needed Environmental Services, Department of General Services, Southern California. Co -wrote the paleontological resources final monitoring report. Public Utilities Department As -Needed Environmental Services, City of San Diego, California. Edited the paleontological resources table for the EIR/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). SANDAG General On -Call Environmental Compliance, Califomia. Co -wrote the final paleontological resources monitoring report. Confidential Transportation Project, San Pedro, Califomia. Reviewed project geology, wrote a paleontological records search summary, and assisted in drafting mitigation measures. Construction Management Services for the Mid -Coast Corridor Projects, PGH Wong Engineering Inc., San Diego, California. Conducted archaeological and paleontological resources monitoring. Gilman Drive Bridge Environmental Compliance, PGH Wong Engineering Inc., San Diego, California. Provided paleontological resources monitoring, assisted with managing paleontological resources monitors, and evaluated fossil discoveries Palm Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion, W.M. Lyles Co. Southern District, California. Conducted paleontological resources monitoring. Zone E Recycled Water System Expansion Archaeological and Native American Monitoring, Santa Margarita Water District, Orange County, California. Co -managed the project and provided archaeological monitoring. .,_ ......... _..................... .,,.....__.,.a,........,.........._...._............................ __._ Page 2 Linda Kry Cultural Resources Linda Kry is an archaeologist with 12 years experience in cultural resource management specializing in various aspects of cultural resources investigations. Ms. Kry's experience includes archival research, reconnaissance surveys, archaeological excavations, artifact analysis, and authoring technical reports pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Project Experience eement No. 5757 University of California, Los Angeles BA, Anthropology Cerritos College AA, Anthropology San Jacinto II Wind Energy Repowering Project, Terra -Gen, LLC, Palm Springs, California. The project involves the decommissioning of approximately 126 existing wind turbines and the construction and operation of up to seven new wind turbines on private lands under the jurisdiction of the City of Palm Springs and on federal lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management. Responsibilities as technical lead include the management of a Phase I cultural resources study in compliance with the provisions of local regulations, CEQA, and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. Kaiser Permanente Moreno Valley Medical Center Master Plan, Kaiser Permanente, Moreno Valley, California. Kaiser Permanente is proposing the development of an approximately 400 -bed hospital, hospital support buildings, outpatient medical office buildings, a central utility plant, and surface and structured parking within their existing hospital campus through a three-phase plan. The City of Moreno Valley is the lead agency under CEQA. As the technical lead for the project, responsibilities include the management of a Phase I cultural resources study. City of Colton Modern Pacific 88 -DU Residential Project, City of Colton, Colton, California. Technical lead for a Phase I cultural resources study and Extended Phase I subsurface probing effort in accordance with CEQA. The City of Colton is proposing the development of 89-detatched single-family homes on an approximately 41.58 -acre site within a single tract. Protea Memory Care Facility Project, City of San Juan Capistrano, San Juan Capistrano, California. Technical lead for a Phase I cultural resources study in accordance with CEQA and subject to California Assembly Bill 52 and Senate Bill 18, in support of a project that proposes to construct a 59 -unit (72 -bed) memory care facility. Coronado Trunk Line Project, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Los Angeles, California. Technical lead for a Phase I cultural resources study pursuant to CEQA and Section 106. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power is proposing to construct a new 30 -inch diameter welded steel pipe, approximately 7,200 feet in length, along with a regulating and relief station vault and flow master vault. The proposed trunk line would add reliability and redundancy to the system. .....................,.,........._,............. w__.....�_ ...............,.,.., Page 1 Agreement N River Supply Conduit Unit 7 Project, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Los Angeles and Burbank, California. Technical lead and monitoring coordinator for the River Supply Conduit (RSC) Unit 7 Project. The existing River Supply Conduit (RSC) is a major transmission pipeline in the LADWP water distribution system. The Project is critical to meet safety of water supplies, reliability of water infrastructure, and sustainability of water supply. Sand Canyon Resort, City of Santa Clarita, Santa Clarita, California. Served as technical lead for a cultural resources study for a project that proposes to develop an abandoned, approximately 75 -acre existing open space into a new resort and spa in an effort to become the premiere golf destination in northern Los Angeles County. Tasks include management of the technical study including the archival research, pedestrian survey, and reporting of the study results. Additionally, authored the Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources chapters for the EIR. Creek at Dominguez Hills, Plentitude Holdings LLC, Carson, California. Served as contributing author for the environmental impact report for a development project that consists of approximately 532,500 square feet of buildings, including: a multiuse indoor sports complex; youth learning experience facility; indoor skydiving facility; public golf recreation facility; marketplace; clubhouse; recreation and dining center; a sports wellness center; and restaurants. Alternatively, a specialty grocery store may be developed in place of some of the restaurant uses. Relevant Previous Experience Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) Midfield Satellite Concourse, Los Angeles, California. Served as field director for archaeological and paleontological monitoring project associated with the creation of a new aircraft passenger concourse and associated elements at LAX. Responsibilities included coordinating with company personnel and project contractors, scheduling, and recordation and collection of field data. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority Compliance Monitoring, Los Angeles, California. Served as archaeological and paleontological monitor for the multiyear and multisite project within the greater Los Angeles area, including the Crenshaw rail transit corridor and the 1.9 -mile Regional Connector subway corridor, as well as their associated stations. In addition, served as monitoring coordinator for the Regional Connector Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring Project. Responsibilities as Monitoring Coordinator included coordinating and scheduling various contractors and archaeologists; developing and providing cultural resources training for new contractors and archaeologists; monthly project updates to client; invoice and budget reviews; lab analysis of all resources collected and preparation of those resources for curation. Long Beach Courthouse, City of Long Beach, Long Beach, California. Served as lead archaeological and paleontological monitor during construction of a new courthouse. Duties included providing workers training regarding archaeological and paleontological resources for on-site contractors, documenting historical archaeological features, and coordinating with clients and staff. In addition, conducted excavations of early 20th century features discovered during monitoring. Also served as lab director for the analysis, cataloging and processing artifacts for curation. Co-authored report documenting project results. Topanga Library, Topanga Canyon, California. Served as crew chief. Involved in multiple facets of archaeological research. Conducted archaeological monitoring during construction of the Topanga Library, which resulted in the discovery of materials associated with a pre -colonial Gabrielino site. Identified and processed cultural and human remains, as well as contributed to report on all findings. Central Los Angeles High School #9, Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles, California. Served as excavator and lab analyst. Duties included assessing artifact conditions and conservation needs, assisting with development and implementation of artifact cleaning procedures, artifact classification, artifact cataloging using Excel, and the reconstruction of artifacts. Over 3,000 historic -era artifacts were recovered from a 19th -century cemetery. __............, ................ ......... _ ._......... _...m.._..... _..... µ.m ......w._.._. ,.., ,.. Page 2 Samantha Murray, MA Historic Resources Samantha Murray is a senior architectural historian with 12 years' Education �ment No. 5757 professional experience in in all elements of cultural resources California State University. Los management, including project management, intensive -level field Angeles investigations, architectural history studies, and historical significance MA, Anthropology evaluations in consideration of the California Register of Historical California State University, Resources (CRHR), the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP), and Northridge local -level evaluation criteria. Ms. Murray has conducted hundreds of BA, Anthropology historical resource evaluations and developed detailed historic context ProfessionalAffiliations statements for a multitude of property types and architectural styles, California Preservation Foundation including private residential, commercial, industrial, educational, medical, Society of Architectural Historians ranching, mining, airport, and cemetery properties, as well as a variety of National Trust for Historic engineering structures and objects. She has also provided expertise on Preservation numerous projects requiring conformance with the Secretary of the Registered Professional Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Archaeologist Ms. Murray meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for both Architectural History and Archaeology. She is experienced managing multidisciplinary projects in the lines of transportation, transmission and generation, federal land management, land development, state and local government, and the private sector. She has experience preparing environmental compliance documentation in support of projects that fall under CEQA/NEPA, and Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). She also prepared numerous Historic Resources Evaluation Reports (HRERs) and Historic Property Survey Reports (HPSRs) for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Project Experience Birch Specific Plan 32 -Unit Condo Project, City of Carson, Los Angeles County, California. Dudek was retained by the City of Carson to prepare a cultural resources report for a project that proposes to demolish approximately 6,200 square feet of existing residential buildings and roughly 5,850 square feet of pavement on the project site, and construct a 32 -unit residential condominium community with on -grade parking, landscaping, and other associated improvements. The historical significance evaluation included three residential properties proposed for demolition. All properties were found not eligible under all designation criteria and integrity requirements. Ms. Murray provided QA/QC of the final cultural resources report. Covina Transit -Oriented Mixed -Use Development Project, City of Covina, Los Angeles County, California. The proposed project would involve a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to develop a mixed-use residential, transit - oriented development (TOD) project. The proposed project would consist of three primary components: 1) a Transit Center and Park & Ride facility; 2) the Covina Innovation, Technology, and Event Center (ITEC) - an event center and professional office incubator space; and 3) residential townhome units. Ms. Murray evaluated one residential and one commercial property over 45 years old for historical significance. Both were found not eligible. Ms. Murray also co-authored the cultural resources technical report. Page 1 Agreement N Robertson Lane Hotel Commercial Redevelopment Project, City of West Hollywood, Los Angeles County, California. Ms. Murray is currently serving as architectural historian and peer reviewer of the historical evaluation report. The project involved conducting a records search, archival research, consultation with local historical groups, preparation of a detailed historic context statement, evaluation of three buildings proposed for demolition in consideration of local, CRHR, and NRHP designation criteria, and assistance with the EIR alternatives analysis. North Montclair Downtown Specific Plan EIR, City of Montclair, San Bernardino County California. The project proposes expansion of the Montclair Plaza (the Mall)— a regional shopping center— which would involve the demolition of portions of the existing Mall, construction of new retail/entertainment/restaurant space, renovation and refurbishment of portions of the existing mall, and the construction additional structured and surface parking. Ms. Murray prepared the cultural resources MND section. Santa Monica/Orange Grove Mixed -Use Development at 7811 Santa Monica Boulevard, City of West Hollywood, Los Angeles County, California. Dudek was retained by the City of West Hollywood to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Santa Monica/Orange Grove Mixed -Use Development Project. In support of the EIR, Dudek conducted a cultural resources inventory and evaluation of two commercial properties at 7811 Santa Monica Blvd. and 1125-1127 N. Ogden Drive. Both properties were found not eligible for designation under NRHP, CRHR and local designation criteria. Ms. Murray co-authored the technical report and provided QA/QC. Transportation Vessels Manufacturing Facility Project at Berth 240, Port of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California. Dudek was retained by the Los Angeles Harbor Department (LAND) to provide a cultural resources assessment for a project that proposes to construct a facility to manufacture transportation vessels at Berth 240 off South Seaside Avenue on Terminal Island. The site is adjacent to the NRHP-eligible Bethlehem Shipyard Historic District. Ms. Murray provided an updated conditions assessment of the site and an updated evaluation of the historic district to address integrity issues. She also reviewed project design plans for new construction within the district for conformance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. LADWP West Los Angeles District Yard Project, City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California. Dudek was retained by Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) to complete a cultural resources study for a project that proposes demolition of five LADWP-owned administrative buildings and warehouses at the West Los Angeles District Headquarters located at 12300 West Nebraska Avenue. Dudek evaluated the yard for historical significance in consideration of NRHP, CRHR, and City of Los Angeles HCM criteria and integrity requirements. Ms. Murray co-authored the significance evaluation and provided QA/QC of the cultural resources report. Berths 238-239 [PBF Energy] Marine Oil Terminal Wharf Improvements Project and Lease Renewal, Port of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California. Dudek was retained by the Los Angeles Harbor Department (LAND) to provide an updated cultural resources assessment for Berths 238-239 at the Port of Los Angeles (POLA), as part of the proposed Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Berths 238-239 [PBF Energy] Marine Oil Terminal Wharf Improvements Project and Lease Renewal. Ms. Murray updated a previous evaluation of the project area conducted in 2010. This included a pedestrian survey, archival research, and a cultural resources impact assessment. The wharf was found not eligible under all designation criteria. The Santa Monica City Yards Master Plan Project, City of Santa Monica, Los Angeles County, California. The City of Santa Monica retained Dudek to complete a cultural resources study for the proposed City Yards Master Plan project site located at 2500 Michigan Avenue in the City of Santa Monica. The study involved evaluation of the entire City Yards site, including two murals and a set of concrete carvings for historical significance and integrity. As a result, the City Yards and its associated public art work was found ineligible under all designation criteria. Ms. Murray conducted the intensive level survey, building permit research, co-authored the technical report, and provided QA/QC of the final cultural resources report. Page 2 ment No. 5757 Kate Kaiser, MSHP ........... ....... ........ Architectural Historian Kate Kaiser is an architectural historian with 7 years' professional Education experience as a cultural resource manager specializing in California University of Oregon Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance, National Historic MS, Historic Preservation Preservation Act Section 106 compliance, reconnaissance and Boston University intensive level surveys, archival research, cultural landscapes, and BA, Archaeology GIS. Ms. Kaiser meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional ProfessionalAfflliatlbns Qualification Standards for both architectural history and archaeology. Association for Preservation Technology — Southwest California Preservation Foundation Historical Resource Assessment for 1230 North Ogden Drive, City of West Hollywood, Los Angeles County, California. Served as architectural historian and author of the historic resource assessment for four residential buildings on the 1230 North Ogden Drive parcel in West Hollywood. Report included conducting a record search, coordinating with the City of West Hollywood for building permits, developing the building description, archival research, historical context development, historical significance evaluations, and California DPR form production for the four buildings. The historical resource assessment report fulfills City requirements during the development permit application process. Stickleback Movie Ranch Historical Resource Evaluation, Los Angeles County, California. Served as architectural historian and author of the cultural resources report in support of a larger mitigated negative declaration document. Contributed on-site fieldwork, building development descriptions, archival research, historical context development, and historical significance evaluations for five extant ranch buildings and several other wildfire - damaged resources. The project proposed to demolish six fire -affected buildings and structures for an ongoing Metropolitan Water District project. John Adams Middle School Auditorium Replacement Project, City of Santa Monica, Los Angeles County, California. Served as architectural historian and co-author of the historical resource evaluation report and contributed resource descriptions and alterations sections. The Santa Monica -Malibu Unified School District retained Dudek write the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for the John Adams Middle School Auditorium Replacement Project for the Santa Monica -Malibu Unified School District. The project proposed to demolish the existing auditorium and music building and replace them with a new performing arts center. Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Specialty Medical Center Project, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California. Served as architectural historian and author of the Historical Resource Assessment for the Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Specialty Medical Center at 755-765 W. College Street in Los Angeles. Preparation of the report involved extensive archival research, reconnaissance level fieldwork, historic context development, building development descriptions, historical significance evaluations for buildings greater than 45 years in age, and DPR forms for the medical center buildings and structures that are proposed for demolition as part of the multiphase project. As a result of the evaluations, all buildings were found not eligible for designation under all applicable national, state, and local designation criteria and integrity requirements. Page 1 Agreement N Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center Project, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California. Served as architectural historian and co-author of the Draft EIR Cultural Resources Chapter and the author of the Cultural Resources Report Appendix. Preparation of the report involved extensive archival research, reconnaissance level fieldwork, historic context development, building development descriptions, historical significance evaluations, and DPR forms for six buildings greater than 45 years in age that are proposed for demolition as part of the multiphase project. As a result of the evaluations, all buildings proposed for demolition were found not eligible for designation under all applicable national, state, and local designation criteria and integrity requirements.DEIR chapter also analyzed potential indirect impacts on two other National Register listed or eligible sites: the Aline Barnsdall Complex and the Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center. LADWP Valley Generating Station Project, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, California. Served as architectural historian and author of the Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Valley Generating Station Project. Preparation of the report involved site recordation, extensive archival research, historic context development, engineering feature development descriptions, historical significance evaluations, and State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Series 523 forms (DPR forms) for each building of the project. The project proposed to remove the 1953 steam generating plant, as well as the four stacks, SPRR rail spur, and underground fuel tanks. LACSD Gardena Pumping Station Project, Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, Gardena, California. Served as architectural historian and author of the Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Gardena Pumping Project. Preparation of the report involved site recordation, extensive archival research, historic context development, engineering feature development descriptions, historical significance evaluations, and State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Series 523 forms (DPR forms) for each building of the project. The project proposed to remove the 1929 and 1960 pumping plant above and below -ground structures, as well as two adjacent parcels containing commercial buildings (1954, 1957) and replace them with a larger capacity pumping plant facility. Phillips 66 and Kinder Morgan Relocation Project, Berths 150-151, Marine Oil Terminal Engineering and Maintenance Standards, Port of Los Angeles, California. Served as architectural historian and co-author of the Updated Historical Resources Evaluation Report for the Phillips 66 and Kinder Morgan Relocation Project. Preparation of the report involved reviewing previous evaluations for Union Oil Terminal Berths 150-151 and writing an updated significance evaluation. The project proposed to remove and replace the original wharfs with new concrete loading platform, mooring and breasting dolphins, access ramps, catwalks, and an underwater bulkhead. It also proposed the construction of new topside and piping components connecting the new platform to existing pipes in the backlands. Globemaster Corridor Specific Plan, City of Long Beach, Los Angeles County, California. Served as architectural historian and author of the Draft EIR-EIS Cultural Resources Chapter for the project. The project proposed to implement the Globemaster Corridor Specific Plan (GCSP), a planning and regulatory framework for redevelopment of an area adjacent to the Long Beach Airport and the surrounding residential and business community which includes rezoning portions of the GCSP area, and a mobility plan that implements new streets and pedestrian connectors. Since the GCSP does not directly propose changes to the buildings or structures in the Plan area, the cultural resources report takes a programmatic overview and offers potential impacts analysis and mitigation measures for future development. Santa Monica City Yards Master Plan Project, City of Santa Monica, Los Angeles County, California. Served as architectural historian and co-author of the historical resource evaluation report. Preparation of the report involved extensive archival research, in -field research, historic context development, building development descriptions, historical significance evaluations, and DPR forms for each building of the project. The City of Santa Monica retained Dudek to complete a cultural resources study for the proposed City Yards Master Plan project site located at 2500 Michigan Avenue in the City of Santa Monica. Page 2 Christian Hunter, PhD Water Resource Engineer Christian Hunter is a Water Resource Engineer with 5 years' professional experience as an environmental analyst specializing in sustainability evaluation, water reuse and recycling planning, and environmental risk assessment. In addition, Mr. Hunter has experience working with watershed - scale stakeholder groups and encouraging dialogue between conflicting water users. His research has included aspects of sustainabe water use, the water footprint, desalination, and the water/energy nexus. Mr. Hunter is also fluent in Spanish. Project Experience ment No. 5757 University of Notre Dame and Pontificia Universidad, Catolica de Chile PhD, Civil and Environmental Engineering Wheaton College MA, Teaching BS, Physics Certifications Certified Erosion Sediment and Storm Water Inspector (CESSWI), No. 00004702 COROADO Project (www.coroado-project.eu), Santiago, Chile: Served as project engineer and lead researcher. Conducted research, administrative tasks, budget management and financial reporting as well as study site management and analysis tool development for EU sponsored S7 project using water reuse and recycling technologies to alleviate water stress in Latin America. Lead researcher for integral Work Package 7 "Assessment of Suitable Water Reuse Options"; managed small team of engineers and academics; developed methodology for resource sustainability evaluation for the selection of water reuse and recycling technologies in multi -stakeholder systems of high scarcity; direct work with stakeholders including two roundtable workshops which gathered conflicting water users to discuss options of water reuse. CEDEUS (Center for Sustainable Urban Development) Project, Santiago, Chile: Conducted research on water resource development and the water/energy nexus as part of a multidisciplinary center of investigation funded by the Chilean government, specializing in sustainable urban development practices. Page 1 eement No. 5757 Mark Storm, INCE Bid. Cert. Noise/Acoustics Mark Storm is a senior acoustician with 28 years' experience as a noise control engineer specializing in environmental noise assessment, mechanical systems noise control and architectural acoustics. Mr. Storm evaluates noise impacts from residential, manufacturing, industrial (e.g., fossil -fueled and renewable power generation and transmission), municipal, and commercial facilities upon sensitive human and wildlife receptors. His services include development and direction of noise and vibration measurement and prediction programs, mitigation recommendations, participation in public meetings, and expert witness testimony. Mr. Storm has authored or managed many California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)/National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) noise technical reports and sections. He has also handled noise for several client Applications for Certification (AFC) brought before the California Energy Commission (CEC). Project Experience "actin Massachusetts Institute of Technology BS, Aeronautics and Astronautics Certifications Institute of Noise Control Engineering (INCE) Board Certified County of San Diego - Approved CEQA Consultant for Noise ProfessionalAffiliations INCE, Board of Directors, Vice President of Public Relations Bridge to Housing, City of Los Angeles - Bureau of Engineering (LABOE), California. Managed and performed baseline -sound -level surveys, construction noise and vibration assessments, mitigation planning, and technical memoranda for several navigation centers and temporary homeless shelter facilities across multiple Los Angeles community districts. Closely coordinated with LABOE staff and City of Los Angeles attorneys to develop defensible technical documents while meeting mayoral emphasis to address homeless crisis. 2018 Long Range Development Plan EIR, University of California, San Diego. Directed operation (stationary and transportation sources) and construction noise impact analyses for update of UC San Diego long-range development planning of capital improvements and concurrent on -campus infrastructure development (e.g., Mid - Coast Trolley). The work included development of a cost-efficient campus -wide representative baseline sound level measurement survey, authorship of a noise technical report that included prediction results from usage of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Model (version 2.5), draft environmental impact report (EIR) noise section, and response to client and public comments. Torrey Wind Project, Torrey Wind LLC, San Diego County, California. Revised and enhanced a noise study to evaluate potential noise impacts to community receptors near a proposed 126 megawatt (MW) wind turbine generator (WTG) project composed of thirty 4.2 -MW wind turbines. Campo Wind Project, Terra -Gen Development LLC, San Diego County, California. Revised and enhanced a noise study to evaluate potential noise impacts to community receptors near a proposed 250 -MW WTG project composed of sixty 4.2 -MW wind turbines and a proposed Boulder Brush electrical switchyard. Responded to client comments and prepared EIR and EIS noise sections. ...�....,�..,w._.,_..�-,_.w..__....w. Page 1 Agreement N JVR Energy Park, JVR Energy Park LLC, San Diego County, California. Directed preparation of a noise study and EIR noise section to evaluate potential noise impacts to Jacumba Hot Springs community receptors near a proposed 90 -MW utility -scale photovoltaic (PV) solar electricity generation facility. Riverside Transmission Reliability Project, Southern California Edison (SCE), Riverside County, California. Directed baseline noise field surveys, corona audible noise studies and preparation of report to update the project's aging EIR noise section and respond to California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) comments. Crimson Solar Project, Recurrent Energy, Riverside County, California. Directed preparation of a noise study that included a baseline sound level survey of the proposed vicinity and predictive analysis of aggregate operation noise emission from power conversion units and substations for a proposed 350 -MW PV electricity generation project. Santa Barbara Emergency Generator Project, SCE, Santa Barbara County, California. Directed and conducted baseline noise field surveys, onsite noise monitoring of emergency generators at three SCE substation sites; provided predictive operation noise analysis (via 3-D modeling) and mitigation guidance at two of the studied sites to reduce noise emission to nearby residential communities. Puente Power Project, NRG, Oxnard, California. Conducted and directed baseline noise assessment and predictive noise impact analyses (involving construction and operation noise) to support California Energy Commission (CEC) Application for Certification (AFC) efforts (including authorship of the Noise & Vibration section, and representing noise during public workshops) for a proposed 262 -MW gas-fired turbine electricity generation facility that would include demolition of existing generation facilities at the Mandalay Generating Station site. Qualcomm Stadium Replacement EIR, City of San Diego, California. Directed predictive 3-D noise models for analysis of multiple hosted events (pop music concert, motorsports, and football) to assess potential impacts to community due to proposed relocation of traditional San Diego Chargers stadium. California Highspeed Rail (Palmdale to Burbank Noise Technical Report), California Highspeed Rail Authority, Sacramento, California. Performed high-speed rail operation noise impact and mitigation (barrier) assessment with Federal Rail Administration (FRA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) techniques for the above-named proposed railway segment. Directed coordination of baseline outdoor ambient sound -level -survey location confirmation and field data collection and analysis. Heil Avenue Stormwater Rehabilitation, City of Huntington Beach, California. Directed baseline -noise -level surveys, predictive operation noise analyses via 3-D sound propagation models, and multi -phase acoustical guidance to AECOM team and client on design of a new pump station to replace existing stormwater pumping facilities. Eastwood Recycled Water Pump Station, Irvine Ranch Water District, Irvine, Califomia. Directed baseline -noise -level surveys, predictive operation noise analyses via 3-D sound propagation models, and multi -phase acoustical guidance to AECOM team and client on design of a new pump station surrounded by newly developed residential properties. Baker Water Treatment Plant - Pump Building Acoustical Upgrades, Irvine Ranch Water District, Lake Forest, California. Managed investigation of multiple pump noise emission to surrounding community, performance of exterior and interior sound level surveys, development of sound insulation upgrade recommendations (based on 3-D predictive noise modeling), review of manufacturer -supplied submittals, and a post -installation community sound level measurement survey to confirm acoustical upgrade performance and effects. Page 2 Agreement No. 5757 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Encinitas (Main) La Quinta Pasadena Riverside San Juan Capistrano J O!IIA I.. i (MIA E II 1 I :: i'l.Ji. 6 fK ( ( )M CENTRAL COAST Santa Barbara Santa Cruz NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Auburn Oakland Sacramento HAWAII Kailua, O'ahu OREGON Portland HABITAT RESTORATION SCIENCES A Dudek Subsidiary Agreement No. 5757 Exhibit C JWA Urban Consultants Proposal Agreement No. 5757 April 19, 2019 Mr. Gregg McClain Planning Manager CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 350 Main Street EI Segundo, CA 90245 Re: Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly -Mariposa West Specific Plan Dear Mr. McClain: JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. (JWA) is pleased to submit a proposal to provide contract planning services for the City of EI Segundo (City). Our team is uniquely qualified for this project. We have provided on-call services for municipalities and are very familiar with the City of EI Segundo and the immediate region. We understand the importance of this project and the catalytic impact it will generate along this portion of Pacific Coast Highway, the northern gateway into the City of EI Segundo. The personnel assigned to this project have over 30 years of professional planning/redevelopment experience in both the public and private sectors. The Principal of JWA will serve as the Project Manager and lives within 20 minutes of City Hall. We fully understand the importance of customer service, meeting deadlines and expectations, and providing professional service to our clients. JWA contact information is as follows: JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Jack Wong 609 Deep Valley Drive, Suite #200 310.347.6310 Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 jwong.jwa@gmail.com www.iwauc.com We appreciate this opportunity to assist the City of EI Segundo in this important engagement. We look forward to meeting with you but in the meantime, if you have any questions regarding our proposal, I can be reached at 310.347.6310. Sincerely, Ja W ng President JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. COMPANY PROFILE 1 2. KEY PERSONNEL 1 3. SCOPE OF WORK 2 4. COST PROPOSAL 5 5. BIOGRAPHIES 5 6. RELEVANT PROJECTS/SERVICES 7 Exhibit A: Scope of Work 13 Exhibit B: Compensation 14 Exhibit C: Peer Review: Traffic Impact 15 Agreement No. 5757 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. (JWA) was founded by Jack L. Wong, in November 2003 and incorporated in March 2004, to provide consulting services and contract staffing to municipalities in the areas of economic development, redevelopment, city planning, housing, grant writing, and project management and negotiation. JWA has successfully assisted several cities, providing contract planning and project management services. We are experienced professionals in the areas of housing, code enforcement, community development, city planning, neighborhood revitalization, economic development and redevelopment. We bring a holistic approach to our work, optimizing service delivery. Our office is located in the South Bay at 609 Dep Valley Drive, Suite #200, Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274. JWA can provide the exact level of planning experience and knowledge to match your service requirements. We understand the shifting nature of planning cases and fluidity in which city planners operate and provide customer -friendly service to the public. Our team members are experienced former public sector employees and understand the importance of communication, customer service and balancing the daily work load within a team -work environment. Our team members are professionals with several years of planning experience and each of us can manage a development project from start to completion. Above all else, JWA can provide immediate attention to the PCH Holly -Mariposa West Specific Plan (Mariposa Specific Plan) and ensure a timely completion and implementation of the project. City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 JWA is assigning the following planning professionals for this project. They each have special talents, skills and expertise in city planning, ranging from economic development, and pro forma and fiscal impact analysis, housing, environmental analysis, and project management and negotiation. We have conducted public community workshops, attended Planning Commission and City Council meetings, prepared staff reports, technical analytical reports, development agreements and have completed initial studies, negative declarations, MNDs and EIRs, specific plans, General Plan and Zoning Ordinance updates. • Jack Wong, Principal. Mr. Wong is assigned as the Project Manager for this project and will provide lead project management services related to the overall project, including analysis of draft specific plan, development agreement, site plan review, subdivision and entitlement process, community outreach and public presentations, staff report, resolutions/ordinances, and coordination services related to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments, and environmental assessment. • John Oshimo, Senior. Mr. Oshimo will provide planning services related to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments, community outreach and public presentations, staff report, resolutions/ordinances, and coordination with the environmental consultant. Together, Jack and John bring substantive strength and knowledge in the areas of specific plans, development agreements, CEQA, community engagement, project management, strategy, and implementation, sustainable planning principles, and customer service. Having substantial private and public sector experience working on complex real estate development projects, JWA fully comprehends and appreciates the City's goals and objectives of the proposed Mariposa West Specific Plan and the City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 2 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 pending real estate development projects that are to be developed in phases. We have direct professional work experience in creating and implementing specific plans, developing and evaluating site plans and development agreements, entitling and plan checking development plans, conducting community outreach, and completing environmental assessments. We have interfaced and coordinated work efforts with regional, county, state and federal agencies on a variety of projects and programs. We are responsive and reliable and have the capacity to meet your needs. It is our understanding that the City of EI Segundo is developing a Specific Plan for the redevelopment of nine acres of land around the Fairfield Inn & Suites, Aloft Hotel, and an old Hacienda Restaurant to provide approximately 273 housing units and over 15,000 square feet of commercial space and create a friendly pedestrian environment. We are familiar with the project site and look forward to working on this important assignment. We understand the significance of this project and potential challenges as it will transform a substantial frontage along Pacific Coast Highway, a heavily -traveled commercial corridor, into a pedestrian -friendly environment; the scale and massing of the mixed-use project that is to be located among existing hotels and adjacent to the multi -family residential area further west and north; the complexity of a phased construction of the mixed-use project over a ten-year period; the importance of inclusive and transparent community engagement; and the complexity and interrelationship of the various planning and entitlement documents that will need to be generated and adopted. The project will be catalytic as it serves as the northern gateway into EI Segundo and creating a sustainable and livable urban space for residents, employees, and tourists to enjoy. All of this happening on a very visible site with the community residents watching. City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 3 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 JWA has provided planning services for the cities of San Gabriel, San Fernando, Carson, South Gate, Paramount, Baldwin Park, Huntington Park, West Covina, Aliso Viejo, and Monterey Park. We have successfully completed controversial projects for our clients and welcome the opportunity to discuss these further with you. JWA's Scope of Work will be tailored to meet or exceed the City's goals and objectives. Our role is to serve, advocate, and represent the interests of the City, by working closely with the developer and the development team to ensure that the City's and community's expectations are met. We are committed to the successful completion of this project and anticipate that there will be the need to meet frequently. We are available for in-person and telephonic meetings with City Staff and developer. Jack Wong lives within 20 minutes of EI Segundo City Hall and can attend extemporaneous meetings at the City's convenience. Since the developer is responsible for the preparation of the development -related documents, such as the Specific Plan, development agreement, and conceptual plans, JWA will interface with the developer to ensure that the project is completed timely but at the same time, JWA will maintain consistent communication with City Staff to ensure that we are on the same page- before and after each developer meeting. Each development project is unique with its own set of opportunities and challenges. As such, the time frame to complete specific tasks vary, contingent on the scale, density, and type of the project, community stakeholder sentiments, complexity of the Specific Plan and development agreement, and potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures. However, the entitlement project schedule for a prototypical project, based upon the project description in the RFP, may require up to 18-22 months to complete. The unknown factors that may impact the project schedule is the level of community support or opposition and the developer's preparation time to complete the plans, agreements, and Specific Plan document. However, the City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 4 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 project schedule will, in all likelihood, change as the project is further defined and clarified. JWA can assist City Staff to develop an effective community engagement strategy that will inform and engage the community stakeholders throughout the entitlement process. Specific tasks are outlined in Exhibit A. JWA can apply an hourly rate for the work performed pursuant to this Proposal. The Fee Schedule can be found in Exhibit B. JWA is assigning Jack Wong (Principal) to be the lead and project manager for this assignment. He will be the primary person managing the day-to-day operations on this project. John Oshimo (Senior) will assist Jack Wong, on specific tasks, such as completing the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments and environmental assessment coordination. JWA is ready to start upon City's direction. Their respective biographies are below. Jack Wong is the Founder and Principal of JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. and has over 30 years of professional experience. He is adept at finding solutions and working through challenges. Recently, he has successfully shepherded major mixed-use development projects, General Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments, and specific plans adoptions for the cities of San Gabriel and San Fernando, at a time when they both had multiple staffing shortages in key positions and a backlog of projects. In San Gabriel, he managed the development of a mixed-use hotel, retail, and residential condominium project from conceptual planning through to building permit issuance within a one-year City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 5 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 period. During the same time, Jack Wong oversaw the processing and entitlement of thirteen development projects. In San Fernando, one of his primary assignments was resuscitate a faltering TOD Corridor Specific Plan, which faced strong vocal community opposition and was in danger of losing its Metro grant funding due to the lack of progress- it was 18 months past its original deadline. By listening and working closely with the specific plan opponents, Jack Wong was able to reenergize and adopt the stalled Specific Plan, General Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments, and EIR over a four-month period- three months ahead of its final deadline date. With a professional background in real estate development and management, Jack Wong has direct working experience with developers, hoteliers, and national, regional, and local tenants, community groups and stakeholders. He is also very familiar with development agreements, specific plans, market demand studies, fiscal impact and environmental analyses. Jack Wong has worked on several commercial corridor studies and revitalization strategies for Imperial Highway in Downey, Valley Boulevard in San Gabriel, San Fernando Road/Truman Street/McClay Avenue in San Fernando, Slauson Avenue in Huntington Park and Maywood, Pacific Boulevard in Huntington Park, Garvey Avenue in Monterey Park, and Ramona Boulevard in Baldwin Park. Mr. Wong received his Master of Arts in Urban Planning, with specialties in Real Estate Finance and Urban Design from the University of California, Los Angeles. He has been a past Director on the League of California Cities Board of Directors and has been a speaker and committee member for the League of California Cities, California Redevelopment Agency, Urban Land Institute, American Planning Association, International Council of Shopping Centers, and the California Planning Roundtable. Mr. Wong was also an Adjunct Associate Professor, teaching economic development, city planning and development at the University of Southern California from 1996-2010. He is currently renewing City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 6 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 his California real estate brokers license. He is the Founder and President of ETHNOPOLIS, Inc. (1992-2018), an award-winning non-profit research and education organization focusing on urban issues and demographic change. John Oshimo is a recent team member, having worked with JWA on the Downtown Hawthorne EIR and Imperial Highway Overlay Zone in the City of Downey. Mr. Oshimo has 40 years of professional urban planning experience and has successfully managed community and regional planning projects: general plans (especially land use and housing elements); specific plans; zoning codes; economic development/redevelopment plans and implementation projects; and environmental documents (CEQA). Through the course of his professional career, John Oshimo has conducted numerous community workshops and public presentations. He was also President and Owner of GRC Associates, Inc., an urban planning and redevelopment consulting firm in Southern California. Mr. Oshimo holds a Master of Planning degree from the University of Southern California and a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of California, Los Angeles. ➢ CITY OF SAN FERNANDO 117 Macneill Street, San Fernando, CA 91340 Mr. Nick Kimball, City Manager (818.898.1200) nkimball@sfcity.org Term of Service: July 5, 2017- January 23, 2018 JWA Team Member: Jack Wong Service Provided: Interim Community Development Director, contract planning and economic development related services City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 7 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 • Completed adoption of Corridor TOD Specific Plan, amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and EIR • Conducted community workshops and one-to-one stakeholder meetings • Managed Community Development Department with two staff shortages in Planning, and one in Code Enforcement ➢ CITY OF SAN GABRIEL 425 South Mission Drive, San Gabriel, CA. 91778 Mr. Steve Preston, City Manager (has retired from the City but I can provide other references if requested) Term of Service: January 7, 2014 -January 8, 2015 JWA Team Member: Jack Wong Service Provided: • Interim Community Development Director, contract planning and economic development related services • Completed entitlement for new mixed-use project with 225 -room Hyatt Hotel, 87 condominiums, and 56,000 square feet of commercial space within one year • Managed seven mixed-use projects (454 dwelling units, 107,000 sf commercial); two residential condominium projects (134 dwelling units), 2 medical office projects (36,500 sf commercial), one 10,000 sf retail project, and one 316 -room hotel with 8,000 sf retail space • Managed Community Development Department with Vacant Economic Development Manager, Building Official, and one planner ➢ CITY OF HAWTHORNE 4455 W. 126th Street, Hawthorne, CA 90250 Gregg McClain, Director of Planning (currently the Planning Manager with the City of EI Segundo 310. 953.5675) Term of Service: February 2012 to January 27, 2017 City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 8 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 JWA Team Member: Jack Wong, John Oshimo Services Provided: • Prepared EIR for Downtown Hawthorne Specific Plan • Procured two Strategic Growth Council grants for two specific plans: Downtown Hawthorne and Eco -Village Industrial Park • Provided project management services for the development of the Eco - Village Specific Plan and prepared all State required quarterly and annual reports ➢ CITY OF BALDWIN PARK 14403 East Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Mr. Melecio Picaso, Redevelopment Manager (has left the City's employment; supervising staff have left the city but I can provide other references if requested) Term of Service: May, 2004 to November 16, 2005 JWA Team Member: Jack Wong, Maribel Aldana, Bill Chow Service Provided: • Interim Community Development Director and Housing Authority Director, contract planning and economic development related services • Reviewed proposed planning projects: housing, commercial retail, and light industrial • Completed revitalization development concept for downtown district • Conducted project negotiations and public meetings with community groups • Managed adoption of redevelopment project area expansion • Prepared, reviewed, and presented staff reports at Planning Commission, Redevelopment Agency, and City Council meetings • Supervised CDBG/HOME Program City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 9 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 ➢ CITY OF MONTEREY PARK 320 West Newark Avenue, Monterey Park, CA 91754 Jim Basham, Director of Community Development (retired; 562.430.4105) Term of Service: September 20, 2006 to January 31, 2017 JWA Team Members: Jack Wong, Rosemary Lackow, Guillermo Arreola, Joe Lambert, Deborah Bradford Services Provided: • Updated Zoning Code to include sustainability concepts, illustrations and user friendly format • Managed the completion of new sustainability general plan elements, Climate Action Plan and GHG Emission Reduction Inventory and adoption of Housing Element • Monitored compliance of affordable housing projects and completed administrative reports • Prepared Downtown Commercial Corridor study and analyzed land use, traffic and parking demand issues • Provided contract staffing for the Planning Manager, Associate Planner, CDBG/HOME, and Residential Rehabilitation Program • Completed Five -Year Implementation Plan, Consolidated Action Plan, and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing • Prepared three successful planning and implementation grants ➢ CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS 11710 E. Telegraph Road, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Wayne Morrel, Director of Planning (562) 868.0511 waynemorrell@santafesprings.org Term of Service: September 2013 to March 2019 JWA Team Member: Jack Wong Services Provided: City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 10 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 • Conducted project negotiations for hotel, housing, mixed-use and commercial retail projects • Prepared Requests for Proposals, Exclusive Negotiating Agreements, and revised Development Agreements • Provided economic development assistance and project review and planning -related services for hotel, housing, and retail projects • Managed the solicitation and negotiations with prospective consultants for updating the General Plan and new plan elements • Managed the solicitation and completion of hotel market study • Updated economic development web pages and provided digital marketing strategies and videos to recruit businesses • Attended project development meetings with developers, Planning Director, City Manager and City Council sub -committees ➢ CITY OF SOUTH GATE 8650 California Avenue, South Gate, CA 90280 Joe Perez, Director of Community Development (323) 563-9566 jperez@sogate.org Term of Service: October 2006 to May 9, 2017; June 14, 2017 -March 2019 JWA Team Member: Jack Wong Services Provided: • Analyzed and completed streamlined development permitting issuance system • Assisted staff with planning analysis and project negotiations for affordable housing and mixed-use development projects • Managed marketing and implementation of the State Enterprise Zone Program and CDBG/HOME Program • Procured two successful Strategic Growth Council planning grants for two specific plans, and comprehensive revision of Zoning Ordinance City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 1 1 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 ➢ CITY OF MAYWOOD 4319 E. Slauson Avenue, Maywood, CA 90270 David Mango, Planning and Building Manager (323) 562-5721 davidjmango@yahoo.com Term of Service: January 25, 2005 to April 5, 2006; April 5, 2017 -December 30, 2017 JWA Team Member: Jack Wong, John Oshimo Services Provided: • Updated Zoning Code for Cannabis operations and processed planning commission cases • Completed zoning code amendment for commercial and sign chapters • Managed and developed strategies for housing and redevelopment/economic development programs • Developed new Commercial and Residential Rehabilitation program and neighborhood revitalization strategy • Completed commercial corridor revitalization strategy City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 12 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF • JWA URBAN CONSULTANTS, INC JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. (Consultant) will provide the City with professional contract city planning services at the direction and supervision of the Director of Planning, or his designee, for the completion of the PCH Holly -Mariposa West Specific Plan and the entitlement of development projects as identified in the Specific Plan. The contract city planning services that are included in this agreement include, among other related services, the following activities in order to effectuate the Specific Plan, amendments to the General Plan Land Use Element and Map, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinance/Map, and CEQA analysis: • Project management • Reviewing and analyzing development site plans, conceptual plans, construction drawings • Apprising City Staff and conducting informational meetings with City Staff once a month, or more frequently as needed • Conduct meetings with the project developer and/or development team • Organize and conduct public workshops, meetings, focus group meetings • Assist in the development of a Community Engagement Strategy • Coordinate activities with the CEQA consultant • Prepare staff reports, resolutions, ordinances, memorandums, informational articles for newspaper publication and/or City website and social media platforms • Attend City Planning Commission and City Council meetings • Traffic Impact Analysis- Peer Review (see Exhibit C) Although the following tasks are not requested in the RFP, JWA can also provide the following services, in relation to this Project, if requested: • Completing fiscal impact studies and pro forma analysis • Completing housing -related programs and analysis JWA is not including CEQA Analysis in this Proposal but has a good working relationship with Meridian Consultants, who we have contacted regarding this RFP. Meridian is submitting a separate EIR Proposal for this project, under separate cover. City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 13 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. EXHIBIT B COMPENSATION Agreement No. 5757 The services provided by Consultant will be charged on an hourly. If additional personnel are anticipated to work on an assignment, the Consultant will inform the City for prior approval. POSITION HOURLY RATE Principal $140 Senior $115 Associate $85 - Assistant $65 Technician Q $60 The fee for the Peer Review of the traffic impact analysis is budgeted at $9,295 (see Exhibit C). Contractor will charge for reimbursable expenses such as mileage, printing, mailing, transmitting or delivering documents to the City, and other similar and customary expenses plus an additional 5% of total invoice amount for overhead and administration. Court related (non -preparation) activities, such as court appearances, depositions, mediation, arbitration, dispute resolution and other expert witness activities, will be charged at a court rate of 1.5 times hourly rate, with a four-hour minimum. Preparation activities will be charged at regular hourly rate pursuant to then effective annual Fee Schedule. City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 14 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. EXHIBIT C PEER REVIEW: TRAFFIC IMPACT Agreement No. 5757 As requested in the City's email, dated March 28, 2019, JWA is including peer review of the traffic impact analysis that will be completed by the developer's team. JWA has a good working relationship with Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc. (Gibson), a well-known transportation engineering and traffic impact analysis firm. PROJECT DESCRIPTION It is our understanding that the City of EI Segundo (City) is developing a Specific Plan for the redevelopment of nine acres of land around the Fairfield Inn & Suites, Aloft Hotel, and an old Hacienda Restaurant to provide approximately 273 housing units and over 15,000 square feet of commercial space (Mariposa Specific Plan). SCOPE OF SERVICES Gibson will conduct a peer review of the Transportation Study (Study) for the Mariposa Specific Plan. Gibson will review the assumptions and methodologies, capacity calculations, and mitigation program and its effectiveness, and Gibson will recommend any changes/additions that Gibson believe will strengthen the analysis. In addition, Gibson will determine if there are additional analyses that should be considered by the developer and City Staff. Gibson will: 1. Review the preliminary Study assumptions as well as the Draft Study to prepare an independent review of the methodologies and conclusions including: a. Data collection b. Trip generation and credits c. Analysis methodologies and implementation d. Significant impact results e. Mitigation measures f. Access adequacy and operations (if included) g. Construction impacts h. Congestion Management Program analysis i. Caltrans analysis j. Vehicle miles traveled analysis (if included) 2. Identify if possible, other physical or operational mitigation measures and analysis methodologies that could be agreeable to the City. City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 15 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc. Agreement No. 5757 3. Summarize our review in a memorandum to the City. 4. Participate in one work sessions/conference call with the City Staff regarding the results of the peer review and the development of access strategies. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Any additional work beyond the above Scope of Services could be completed, with prior Client approval, for an additional fee, to be billed on a time and expense basis. SCHEDULE Gibson can complete the peer review within three weeks of receipt of the Study. BUDGET As detailed in the Attachment, the budget for the Scope of Services defined in this Proposal is based upon Gibson's normal hourly billing rates, plus reimbursement for direct expenses. The Scope of Services assumes no ne data collection. Based on this assumption, the budget is $9,295. This budget is subject to change if the City makes changes to the Proposed Scope of Services. GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC. COST ESTIMATE POSITION HOURLY RATE TOTAL HOURS TOTAL COSTS U President $375 8 $3,000 Principal $295 0 $0 Principal Associate $275 I 0 $0 Senior Associate $195 9 $1,755 N Associate $175 G 22 $3,850 Q Administrative Manager $160 4 �� $640 Technician $130 0 $0 Field Technician $100 0 $0 I TOTAL LABOR C $9,245 Traffic Counts @ $570 $0 per intersection Mileage/Parking $50 @ $0.58 per mile TOTAL COST $9,295 Note: This estimate does not include review, permit or other fees the City may assess on the project. City of EI Segundo Contract Planning Services- PCH Holly Mariposa West Specific Plan 16 JWA Urban Consultants, Inc.