Loading...
CONTRACT 5693 Professional Services Agreement CLOSEDAgreement No. 5693 Agreement No. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND GPA CONSULTING This AGREEMENT is entered into this d y of April, 2019, by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a general law city and municipal corporation ("CITY") and Galvin Preservation Associates Inc. (dba GPA Consulting), a California Corporation ("CONSULTANT"). 1. CONSIDERATION. A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, below; B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement; C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a sum not to exceed $8,300.00 for CONSULTANT's services. CITY may modify this amount as set forth below. Unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement, CITY will pay this sum as specified in the attached Exhibit "A," which is incorporated by reference. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. A. CONSULTANT will perform services listed in the attached Exhibit "A," which is incorporated herein. B. CONSULTANT will, using a standard of care equal to, or greater than, the degree of skill and diligence ordinarily used by reputable professionals, with a level of experience and training similar to CONSULTANT, performing under circumstances similar to those required by this Agreement, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space and facilities, and all tests, testing and analyses, calculation, and all other means whatsoever, except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY as specified in Exhibit "A", Scope of Services, necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement. 3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit a detailed invoice to CITY which lists the hours worked and hourly rates for each personnel category and reimbursable costs (all as set forth in Exhibit "A") the tasks performed, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period, the cumulative Page 1 of 11 Agreement No. 5693 percentage completed for each task, the total cost of that work during the preceding billing month and a cumulative cash flow curve showing projected and actual expenditures versus time to date. 4. POLITICAL REFORM ACT. CONSULTANT agrees that it will be considered a public official subject to the Political Reform Act of 1974 for purposes of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees and warrants that it has no financial interests which may be materially affected by the project for which the Initial Study, as specified in the SERVICES, is being prepared. Such financial interests may include, without limitation, interests in business entities, real property, or sources of income exceeding $500 received within the past year. CONSULTANT further warrants that, before executing this Agreement, it reviewed the Political Reform Act of 1974 and the Fair Political Practices Commission regulations, including, without limitation, Chapter 7 of Title 2 of the California Administrative Code, Section 18700, et seq., in order to determine whether any conflict of interest would require CONSULTANT to refrain from performing the SERVICES or in any way attempting to use its official position to influence the governmental decisions underlying the subject environmental clearances. 5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. A. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has Thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; ii. Carefully considered how the services should be performed; and iii. Understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. B. If services involve work upon any site, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, before commencing the services hereunder. Should CONSULTANT discover any latent or unknown conditions that may materially affect the performance of the services, CONSULTANT will immediately inform CITY of such fact and will not proceed except at CONSULTANT's own risk until written instructions are received from CITY. C. Although CITY has a duty to the public to independently review any environmental document, including, without limitation a negative declaration or draft EIR, prepared by CONSULTANT, that duty to the public, or the breach thereof, will not relieve CONSULTANT of its duties under this Section or any representation provided by CONSULTANT in this Agreement. 6. KEY PERSONNEL. A. CONSULTANT's key personnel assigned to perform work under this Agreement and their level of responsibility are as follows but is not limited to: Page 2 of 11 Name Title/Reswiisibility Andrea Galvin President/ Principal Architectural Historian Richard Galvin Vice President and Principal environmental Planner Teresa Grimes Principal Architectural Historian Agreement No. 5693 Companv GPA Consulting GPA Consulting GPA Consulting B. The resume of each of the individuals identified in this Section are attached to this Agreement, collectively, as Exhibit "A," and incorporated by reference. C. In the event CITY objects to the continued involvement with this Agreement by any of the persons listed in this Section, or any other person selected by CONSULTANT to perform services under this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT agrees that it will replace such persons with individuals that are agreed to by CITY. 7. TERM. The terns of this Agreement will be from April 2019, to April;, 2020, l.Jnless otherwise determined by written amendment between the parties, this Agreement will terminate in the following instances: A. Completion of the work specified in Exhibit "A"; B. Termination as stated in Section 15. 8. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. CONSULTANT will not perform any work under this Agreement until: A. CONSULTANT furnishes proof of insurance as required by this Agreement; and B. CITY gives CONSULTANT a written Notice to Proceed. C. Should CONSULTANT begin work on any phase in advance of receiving written authorization to proceed, any such professional services are at CONSULTANT's own risk. 9. TIME EXTENSIONS. Should CONSULTANT be delayed by causes beyond CONSULTANT's control, CITY may grant a time extension for the completion of the contracted services. If delay occurs, CONSULTANT must notify CITY within forty-eight hours (48 hours), in writing, of the cause and the extent of the delay and how such delay interferes with the Agreement's schedule. CITY may, but is not required to, extend the completion time, when appropriate, for the completion of the contracted services. Page 3 of 11 Agreement No. 5693 10. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties. 11. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 12. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT, at its sole expense, will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. 13. PROJECT COORDINATION AND SUPERVISION. A. Andrea Galvin, President and Richard Galvin, Vice President will be responsible for negotiations and contractual matters with CITY's Project Manager. B. Teresa Grimes, Principal will be assigned as Project Manager and will be responsible for job performance and coordination with CITY's Project Manager. C. Gregg McClain, Planning Manager will be assigned as CITY's Project Manager and will be personally in charge of and personally supervise or perform the technical execution of the Project on a day-to-day basis on behalf of CITY and will maintain direct communication with CONSULTANT's Project Manager. 14. WAIVER. CITY's review or acceptance of, or payment for, work product prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement will not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights CITY may have under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising from CONSULTANT's performance. A waiver by CITY of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement will not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement, whether of the same or different character. 15. TERMINATION. A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination will be in writing. B. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement at any time with CITY's mutual consent. Notice will be in writing at least thirty (30) days before the effective termination date. C. Should termination occur, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT will, at CITY's option, become CITY's property, and CONSULTANT will receive Page 4 of 11 Agreement No. 5693 just and equitable compensation for any work rendered in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement up to the effective date of notice of termination, not to exceed the total costs under Section 1(C). D. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated. E. By executing this document, CONSULTANT waives any and all claims for damages that might otherwise arise from CITY's termination under this Section. 16. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement are CITY's property. CONSULTANT may retain copies of said documents and materials as desired, but will deliver all original materials to CITY upon CITY's written notice. CITY agrees that use of CONSULTANT's completed work product, for purposes other than identified in this Agreement, or use of incomplete work product, is at CITY's own risk. 17. PUBLICATION OF DOCUMENTS. Except as necessary for performance of service under this Agreement, no copies, sketches, or graphs of materials, including graphic art work, prepared pursuant to this Agreement, will be released by CONSULTANT to any other person or city without CITY's prior written approval. All press releases, including graphic display information to be published in newspapers or magazines, will be approved and distributed solely by CITY, unless otherwise provided by written agreement between the parties. 18. INDEMNIFICATION. A. CONSULTANT agrees to the following: i. Indemnification for Professional Services. CONSULTANT will save harmless and indemnify, including, without limitation, CITY's defense costs (including reasonable attorney's fees), from and against any and all suits, actions, or claims, of any character whatever, brought for, or on account of, any injuries or damages sustained by any person or property resulting or arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission by CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT's officers, agents, employees, or representatives, in the performance of this Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful misconduct. ii.. Indemnification for other Damages. CONSULTANT indemnifies and holds CITY harmless from and against any claim, action, damages, costs (including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees), injuries, or liability, arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, except for such loss or damage arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful misconduct. Should CITY be named in any suit, or should any claim be brought against it by suit or otherwise, whether the same be Page 5 of 11 Agreement No. 5693 groundless or not, arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, CONSULTANT will defend CITY (at CITY's request and with counsel satisfactory to CITY) and will indemnify CITY for any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise. iii. Exclusion for CEQA Actions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CONSULTANT need not indemnify, defend, or hold CITY harmless in CEQA actions initiated pursuant to Public Resources Code §§ 21167 and 21168 where CONSULTANT's work may form the basis of a lawsuit. However, should CONSULTANT's work, as contemplated by this Agreement, contain errors or omissions that results in an adverse ruling against CITY, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify and hold CITY harmless to the extent provided for in Section 18(A)(i). B. For purposes of this section "CITY" includes CITY's officers, officials and employees, C. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions will survive termination of this Agreement. D. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONSULTANT as required by Section 22, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification. 19. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT's professional services. CONSULTANT's attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY's written approval are prohibited and will be null and void. 20. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only. 21. AUDIT OF RECORDS. A. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and Page 6 of 11 Agreement No. 5693 will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement. B. Upon inspection, CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements of this Section. CONSULTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective measures will result in immediate termination of this Agreement. C. CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement. 22. INSURANCE. A. Before commencing performance under this Agreement, and at all other times this Agreement is effective, CONSULTANT must procure and maintain the following types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum, with the limits set forth below: ane of Insurance Commercial general liability: Professional Liability Business automobile liability Workers compensation Limits (combined :yin ale $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Statutory requirement. B. Commercial general liability insurance will meet or exceed the requirements of ISO -CGL Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. The amount of insurance set forth above will be a combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage for the policy coverage. Commercial General Liability policy will be endorsed to name City, its officials, and employees as "additional insureds" under said insurance coverage and to state that such insurance will be deemed "primary" such that any other insurance that may be carried by City will be excess thereto. Such endorsement must be reflected on ISO Form No. CG 20 10 11 85 or 88. Such insurance will be on an "occurrence," not a "claims made," basis and will not be cancelable or subject to reduction except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City. C. Automobile coverage will be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 0106 92, including symbol 1 (Any Auto) or an acceptable equivalent. Page 7 of 11 Agreement No. 5693 D. Professional liability coverage will be on an "occurrence basis" if such coverage is available, or on a "claims made" basis if not available. When coverage is provided on a "claims made basis," CONSULTANT will continue to maintain the insurance in effect for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated ("extended insurance"). Such extended insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by City arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect. E. CONSULTANT will furnish to City duly authenticated Certificates of Insurance evidencing maintenance of the insurance required under this Agreement, endorsements as required herein, and such other evidence of insurance or copies of policies as may be reasonably required by City from time to time. Insurance must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best Company Rating equivalent to at least a Rating of "A:VII." F. Should CONSULTANT, for any reason, fail to obtain and maintain the insurance required by this Agreement, City may terminate. 23. USE OF CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY's prior written approval to use any consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must approve of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation. 24. INCIDENTAL TASKS. CONSULTANT will submit to the CITY progress reports each month for each major task, a description of the work remaining and a description of the work to be done before the next schedule update. 25. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows: CITY: City of El Segundo Planning & Building Safety Department 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245-3813 Attention: Gregg McClain, Planning Manager gmcclain@elsegundo.org Phone: (310) 524-2393 Fax: (310) 322-4167 CONSULTANT: GPA Consulting. 231 California Street El Segundo, CA 90245 Attention: Andrea Galvin, President andrea@gpaconsulting-us.com Phone: (310) 792-2690 Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Page 8 of 11 Agreement No. 5693 26. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability. 27. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT's or CITY's obligations under this Agreement. 28. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County or in the Federal District Court in the District of California in which Los Angeles County is located. 29. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Exhibits, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. There are three (3) Exhibits to this Agreement. This Agreement will bind and inure to the benefit of the parties to this Agreement and any subsequent successors and assigns. 30. CONSISTENCY. In interpreting this Agreement and resolving any ambiguities, the main body of this Agreement takes precedence over the attached Exhibits; this Agreement supersedes any conflicting provisions. Any inconsistency between the Exhibits will be resolved in the order in which the Exhibits appear below: A. Exhibit A: Proposal for Services/Scope of Work; B. Exhibit A: Budget; and C. Exhibit A: Resumes. 31. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party. 32. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and, as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect. Page 9 of 11 Agreement No. 5693 33. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment signed by both parties. CITY's city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY. 34. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Agreement, agreements ancillary to this Agreement, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission. Such facsimile signature will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. 35. COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS. The parties agree that all of the provisions hereof will be construed as both covenants and conditions, the same as if the words importing such covenants and conditions had been used in each separate paragraph. 36. CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and will not affect the interpretation of this Agreement. 37. FORCE MAJEURE. In no event shall either CONSULTANT or the CITY have any claim or right against the other for any failure of performance where such failure of performance is caused by or is the result of causes beyond the reasonable control of the other party due to any occurrence commonly known as a "force majeure," including, but not limited to: acts of God; fire, flood, or other natural catastrophe; acts of any governmental body, labor dispute or shortage; national emergency; insurrection; riot; or war. 38. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement using a standard of care equal to, or greater than, the degree of skill and diligence ordinarily used by reputable professionals, with a level of experience and training similar to CONSULTANT, performing under circumstances similar to those required by this Agreement. CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency. [Signatures on next page] Page 10 of 11 Agreement No. 5693 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO a general law city G..e , Car to ,, 6 Cry Manager Galvin Preservation Associates Inc. (dba GPA Consulting) a California Corporation Andrea Galvin, President Richard Galvin, Vice President A".II . T. Taxpayer ID No. 20-3228866 Tracy ''weaver, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: r, v� Mark D. Hensley, 6 City Attorney PAPlanning & Building Safety\Planning\_Planning\Administration\Contracts\PSA for GPA Planning Services Contract 2019.doc Page 11 of 11 Agreement No. 5693 VI{VIIIIIIillliiiiul1111 l "''iIIIIII I�IIIIIIII'lllll o ' ;I� I���w�uq��ji��r'iiYpIllliiilllll�lllillllli�ii" iilllumi , I °'Nllllllm IIII "„''!"!�I IIIIII,,IIIIII�,uiuII,IIVIId : �I E$17 Proposal for Historic Preservation Consulting Services Smokey Hollow Building Addition City of El Segundo Prepared for: Maria Baldenegro, Assistant Planner Planning and Building Safety Department 350 Main Street EI Segundo, CA 90245 Prepared by: Teresa Grimes, Principal GPA Consulting 617 S. Olive Street, Suite 910 Los Angeles, CA 90014 April 3, 2019 Agreement No. 5693 FIRM PROFILE P," u GPA Consulting (GPA) is pleased to present this proposal for historic preservation consulting services for the proposed Smoky Hollow Building Addition project in the City of EI Segundo. GPA is an environmental planning firm with teams specializing in biological and historical resources. Founded in 2003, GPA is a certified woman -owned, disadvantaged, and small business enterprise registered as a California Corporation. Our company values are quality, integrity, and reliability. With these values we are able to work collaboratively with our clients to meet their project objectives. Our clients include government agencies, architects, developers, and non-profit organizations. We provide a full -range of historic preservation services including: • Historic Context Statements • Historic Resource Surveys • Mills Act Applications • Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Applications • National, State, and Local Landmark Nominations • Historic Structures Reports • NEPA, CEQA, and Section 106 Compliance Reports • HABS/HAER Reports • Design Guidelines • Public Outreach, Training, and Educational Programs • Professional Peer Reviews The GPA team consists of several highly qualified professionals who have experience in all aspects of historic preservation. Each GPA team member meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for history, architectural history, and/or historic architecture as outlined in 36 Code of Federal Regulations Part 61. Current and recently completed projects, individual r6sum6s, and client references are included in Appendix A of this proposal. Sample work products are available upon request. Agreement No. 5693 SCOPE OF WORK It is our understanding that there is a proposed project that involves three parcels (listed below) that have been recently combined into one parcel with the address 140 Oregon Street. The parcel is occupied by three buildings constructed between 1957 and 1966. 4139-002-021 140 Oregon Street One-story light industrial 1957 4139-002-022 1320 E. Franklin Avenue One-story light industrial 1959 4139-002-024 1325 E. EI Segundo Boulevard One light industrial 1966 The proposed project would involve a two-story, 60,000 addition to the one-story brick building with the address 140 Oregon Avenue. As the existing building that would be altered as a result of the project is over 45 years of age, the City of EI Segundo is requesting the preparation of a Historical Resource Evaluation Report (HRER) for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Following is a scope of work to prepare a HIRER, which will evaluate the subject building for eligiblity in the national, state, and local registers. 1. Project Management - GPA will consult with the City as needed to complete the HIRER. All work products will be internally peer reviewed for quality control. No work products will be shared with parties outside of GPA without the express consent of the City. 2. Existing Information - A records search will be conducted at the South -Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton to confirm that the property is not currently listed under national, state, or local landmark programs or previously evaluated as eligible for listing in a historic resources survey of the area. 3. Research - General research will be conducted to determine the context(s) in which the property should be evaluated. We assume that the primary context will be industrial development and Mid-century Modern architecture in the City of EI Segundo. Property - specific research will be conducted to determine the potential significance of the associated individuals such as owners, residents, builders, and architects. 4. Field Survey - A field survey will be conducted of the property to ascertain its physical integrity. To be eligible as a historical resource, a property may have been altered from its original design, but it must retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance. Access to the property so all sides of the building as well as the interior can be photographed will be pre -arranged with the City. 5. Draft Report - A draft HIRER will be prepared and submitted to the City electronically as a Word document. The draft HIRER will include, but not necessarily limited to: A. An executive summary. B. An explanation of the methodology and research techniques. C. The criteria for determining historic significance and integrity under national, state, and local landmark programs. E Agreement No. 5693 SCOPE OF WORK 1�9 D. A brief history and description of the property. E. An evaluation of the property for listing under national, state, and local landmark programs according to National Park Service, California Office of Historic Preservation, and City of EI Segundo standards and guidelines. F. The description, as well as the evaluation of the property, will be recorded on state historical resource inventory forms. G. Historic documents, photographs, and maps, as well as current photographs and maps, will be attached. b. Final Report -The draft HRER will be revised based upon one round of comments from the City. The final HIRER will be submitted to the City electronically as Word and PDF documents. 3 Agreement No. 5693 FEES AND TERMS ('' �' A The fees for the HIRER are outlined in the table below. It should be explicitly understood that hours may be allocated differently among tasks and staff persons. This proposal is valid for 60 days for the proposed project and tasks as described in the scope of work above. Changes to the proposed project may result in additional work and therefore may result in additional costs, which would be mutually agreed upon in writing prior to commencing the additional work. If the building is evaluated as a historical resource defined by CEQA, GPA will provide a separate scope and cost for the analysis of project impacts and mitigation measures. 4 Principal $200 I Associate $125 Total Cost Rate Rate Hours I Cost Hours cost 1. Project Management 4 —T $800 $800 2. Existing information 2 I $250 $250 3. Field Survey 4 $500 j $500 4. Research I i 16 J, 2,000E $2,000 1 5. Draft Report 32 $4,000 $4,000 6. Final Report 2 $250 $250 Subtotal for Report $7,800 Expenses $500 Total Estimated Cost $8,300 This proposal is valid for 60 days for the proposed project and tasks as described in the scope of work above. Changes to the proposed project may result in additional work and therefore may result in additional costs, which would be mutually agreed upon in writing prior to commencing the additional work. If the building is evaluated as a historical resource defined by CEQA, GPA will provide a separate scope and cost for the analysis of project impacts and mitigation measures. 4 Agreement No. 5693 APPENDIX A APPENDIX A: Selected Projects, Resumes, Standard Rates, and References APPENDIX A SELECTED PROJECTS Agreement No. 5693 We have selected the following projects for your review, as they are particularly relevant to your project: 2017-19 Los Angeles County Museum of Art Master Plan - GPA is assisting the County of Los Angeles with the proposed redevelopment of the original LACMA complex constructed in 1965. Services have included evaluating the complex as a historical resource, identifying historical resources in the vicinity of the project site, and analyzing potential impacts on the identified historical resources. The findings of the Historical Resource Technical Report prepared for the project have been incorporated into a DEIR. 2017-19 Times Mirror Square, City of Los Angeles - GPA is assisting the Onni Group with the proposed redevelopment of Times Mirror Square in Downtown Los Angeles. Services have included evaluating the complex as a historical resource, identifying the character -defining features of the historical resources on the project site, identifying historical resources in the vicinity of the project site, and analyzing potential impacts on the identified historical resources. The findings of the Historical Resource Technical Report prepared for the project have been incorporated into a DEIR. 2017-19 913 S. Figueroa, City of Los Angeles - GPA prepared a Historical Resource Technical Report for a project that involves the construction of a 66 -story mixed-use development in Downtown Los Angeles. While there are no historical resources on the project site, there were several identified in the vicinity. Services included analyzing the potential for indirect impacts on the identified historical resources. The findings of the report have been incorporated into a DEIR for the project. 2017-18 CF Braun & Company Alhambra Plant, City of Alhambra - The CF Braun & Company Alhambra Plant was originally constructed in phases beginning in the early 1920s and ending in the 1950s. In 1999, a portion of the property was determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places as a historic district. GPA updated the previous evaluation in order to analyze potential impacts from a proposed project. The findings of the Historical Resource Technical Report prepared for the project were incorporated into an EIR. 2017-18 Los Angeles Wholesale Flower Terminal, City of Los Angeles - GPA prepared a Historical Resource Evaluation Report for the Wholesale Flower Terminal in Downtown Los Angeles. Although the organization was founded in 1912, the existing building was constructed in 1962 and expanded in 1981. A proposed project involves the removal of the 1962 portion of the building, the consolidation of the vendors in the 1981 portion, and the development of the remaining portion of the property. The building was researched and evaluated as a potential historical resource; however, the report concluded that it was ineligible for lack of significance. The findings of the report were incorporated into an EIR for the project. 2017-18 Olympic and Hill, City of Los Angeles - GPA prepared a Historical Resource Technical Report for a project that involves the construction of a 65 -story mixed-use development in Downtown Los Angeles. While there are no historical resources on the project site, there were several identified in the vicinity. Services included analyzing the potential Ci Agreement No. 5693 APPENDIX A :... for indirect impacts on the identified historical resources. The findings off he report were incorporated into an EIR for the project. 2017 City of Hope Campus Plan, City of Duarte - The City of Hope was founded by the Jewish Consumptive Relief Association in 1913. Today it is a national medical center specializing in the treatment and cure of cancer. GPA assisted the City of Hope in preparing a master plan for the 116 -acre campus. Services included conducting a historic resources survey of 98 buildings, structures, and landscape features on the campus, and making recommendations for the treatment of the identified historical resources. The findings of the Historical Resource Technical Report prepared for the campus plan were incorporated into an EIR. 2017 Edgewater Inn Marina Hotel, City of Long Beach - Completed in 1963, the Edgewater Inn Marina Hotel is located north of Alamitos Bay. GPA prepared a Historical Resource Evaluation Report for a proposed project that involved the removal of the existing building and the construction of a new retail complex. The property was researched and evaluated as a potential historical resource; however, the report concluded that it was ineligible for lack of significance and integrity. The findings of the report were incorporated into an EIR for the project. 2017 8th and Figueroa Tower, City of Los Angeles - GPA prepared a Historical Resource Technical Report for a project that involves the construction of a 41 -story mixed-use development in Downtown Los Angeles. While there are no historical resources on the project site, there were several identified in the vicinity. Services included analyzing the potential for indirect impacts on the identified historical resources. The findings of the report were incorporated into an EIR for the project. 2017 Art Center College of Design Master Plan, City of Pasadena - GPA assisted the City of Pasadena in preparing a master plan for the Art Center College of Design, which encompasses the Hillside Campus and South Campus. The main building on the Hillside Campus is a designated Pasadena Historic Monument. Services included identifying other historical resources on and near the two campuses and analyzing potential impacts on the identified historical resources. The findings of the Historical Resource Technical Report prepared for the master plan were incorporated into an EIR. 2016 Commonwealth Nursery, City of Los Angeles - The Commonwealth Nursery is located in Griffith Park, which is a designated Los Angeles Historic -Cultural Monument. GPA prepared a Historical Resource Technical Report for a proposed project that involved reusing the site as a nature education facility. Services included evaluating the site as an individual historical resource, preparing a detailed survey of the character -defining features of the site, and working with the landscape architects in complying with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The findings of the report were used to approve a Categorical Exemption for the project. 2016 755 S. Los Angeles Street, City of Los Angeles - GPA prepared a Historical Resource Evaluation Report for a proposed project that involved the adaptive reuse of an existing building in Downtown Los Angeles. The property was researched and evaluated as a potential historical resource; however, the report concluded that it was ineligible for lack of significance and integrity. As such, the project was Categorically Exempt from CEQA. Agreement No. 5693 APPENDIX A 2015 Midtown Specific Plan, City of Long Beach - GPA prepared a Historical Resource Technical Report for the Midtown Specific Plan. Services included collecting existing information, identifying listed historical resources, and conducting a reconnaissance - level survey to identify potential historical resources in the area. One local landmark was observed in the area: The Packard Motors Building. The survey identified 66 potential historical resources. GPA drafted measures to mitigate the impact of future development projects on listed and potential historical resources. 2015 Jefferson and La Cienega, City of Los Angeles - GPA prepared a Historical Resource Evaluation Report for an 11 -acre project site at the intersection of Jefferson and La Cienega Boulevards. Four buildings constructed between 1948 and 1992 and a radio tower and radio mast erected in 1937 occupied the project site. A proposed project involved that the removal of all the existing buildings and structures and the construction of a new mixed-use development. The buildings and structures were researched and evaluated as potential historical resources; however, the report concluded that none were eligible for lack of significance and/or integrity. The findings of the report were incorporated into an EIR for the project. 2015 11036-38 Moorpark Street, City of Los Angeles - GPA prepared a Historical Evaluation Resource Report for a project site in Sherman Oaks occupied by eight one-story residential buildings constructed in 1951. A proposed project involved the removal of all the existing buildings and the construction of a new multi -family residential development. GPA researched and evaluated the project site as a potential historic district; however, the report concluded that it was ineligible for lack of significance and integrity. The findings of the report were incorporated into an IS/MND for the project. 2015 Mira Loma Detention Center, County of Los Angeles - The Mira Loma Detention Center was originally constructed as a flight school for British Royal Air Force cadets under the Lend -Lease Act. GPA conducted a historic resources survey of the property, identified a potential historic district, and analyzed potential impacts from a proposed project. The findings of the Historical Resource Technical Report prepared for the project were incorporated into an EIR. 2015 John Anson Ford Theatres, County of Los Angeles - Constructed in 1920 and rebuilt in 1931, the John Anson Ford Theatres complex is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources. It is one of the oldest performing arts venues in Los Angeles still in use. GPA assisted the County of Los Angeles with the preservation and rehabilitation of the complex, which was completed in phases, starting in 2013. Services included preparing the environmental review documents, working with the architects and engineers in complying with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, preparing a Historic Structures Report, and monitoring construction. The findings of the Historical Resource Technical Report prepared for the third phase of the project were incorporated into an EIR. 2015 732 S. Spring Street, City of Los Angeles - GPA prepared a Historical Resource Technical Report for a project that involved the construction of a 24 -story mixed-use development in Downtown. While there were no historical resources on the project site, there were several identified in the vicinity. Services included working with the design team in developing plans for the project that were compatible with the adjacent historical resources. The findings of the report were incorporated into an IS/MND. 0 Agreement No. 5693 APPENDIX A 2015 737-51 S. Spring Street, City of Los Angeles - GPA prepared a Historical Resource Technical Report for a project that involved the construction of a 24 -story mixed-use development in Downtown. While there were no historical resources on the project site, there were several identified in the vicinity. Services included working with the design team in developing plans for the project that are compatible with the adjacent historical resources. The findings of the Historic Resource Report were incorporated into an IS/MND. 2015 1000 S. Santa Fe Avenue, City of Los Angeles - GPA prepared a Historic Resource Evaluation Report for a project site in Downtown. A proposed project involved the adaptive reuse of the existing industrial building as a boutique hotel. The building was researched and evaluated as a potential historical resource; however, the report concluded that it was ineligible for lack of significance. The findings of the report were incorporated into an IS/MND for the project. 2015-18 Sunset Junction Gateway, City of Los Angeles - GPA prepared a Historical Resource Evaluation Report for three project sites in Silver Lake collectively referred to as the Sunset Junction Gateway. A proposed project involved the removal of all the existing buildings and the construction of three new mixed-use developments. The buildings were researched and evaluated as potential historical resources; however, the report concluded that none were eligible for lack significance and/or integrity. The findings of the report were incorporated into an EIR for the project. 2014-15 Houghton Park and Community Center Complex, City of Long Beach - GPA prepared a Historical Resource Evaluation Report for the Houghton Park and Community Center Complex. GPA conducted research and evaluated the park as well as the community center complex. The report concluded that the park did not retain sufficient integrity to qualify as a potential historic district; however, the 1930 portion of the community center complex appeared eligible for local landmark designation. GPA subsequently reviewed plans for the alteration of the building for compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. 2014 Los Angeles BioMedical Research Institute, City of Torrance - The Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute is located on the Harbor -UCLA Medical Center campus, which was originally constructed as the Los Angeles Port of Embarkation Station Hospital in 1943. A proposed project involved the removal of some of the buildings and construction of two new medical research buildings. GPA researched and evaluated the project site as a potential historic district; however, the Historical Resource Evaluation Report concluded that it was ineligible for lack of integrity. The findings of the report were incorporated into an IS/MND for the project. 2013 Claremont Graduate University Master Plan, City of Claremont - Founded in 1925, Claremont Graduate University (CGU) is one of seven institutions that form the Claremont Colleges. GPA assisted CGU in preparing a master plan for the campus. Services included conducting a historic resource survey of the campus and making recommendations for the treatment of the identified historic resources. The findings of the Historical Resource Report prepared for the master plan were incorporated into an EIR. Agreement No. 5693 APPENDIX A b TERESA GRIMES is a Principal Architectural Historian at GPA with over 25 years of experience in the field of historic preservation. She is widely recognized as an expert in the identification and evaluation of historical resources having successfully prepared dozens of landmark and historic district applications for a wide variety of f property types. Teresa graduated from the University of California in Los Angeles with a Master of Arts in Architecture, and has worked in the private, public, and non-profit sectors. She has led the GPA Historic Preservation team since 2009, skillfully supervising a wide array of projects throughout California. Teresa has extensive experience in the preparation of environmental compliance documents in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act for projects involving major landmarks. Additionally, she has coordinated and reviewed documents for smaller -scale commercial, institutional, and residential property types throughout Los Angeles County. Teresa also participated in SurveyLA, the citywide historic resource survey of Los Angeles, from its inception, contributing to multiple sections of the citywide context statement and coordinating community plan area historic resources surveys. Educational Background: • M.A., Architecture, University of California, Los Angeles, 1992 • B.A., Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles, 1986 Professional Experience: • GPA Consulting, Principal Architectural Historian, 2009 -Present • Christopher A. Joseph & Associates, Senior Architectural Historian, 2006-2009 • Teresa Grimes/Historic Preservation, Principal, 1999-2005, 1993-1994, 1991- 1992 • Historic Resources Group, Architectural Historian, 1994-1998 • Getty Conservation Institute, Research Associate, 1992-1993 • Los Angeles Conservancy, Preservation Officer, 1988-1991 Qualifications: • Meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for history and architectural history pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 61, Appendix A. Professional Activities: • Pasadena Heritage Board Member, 2008-2012 • West Hollywood Cultural Heritage Advisory Board Member, 1990-1994 Selected Projects: • Los Angeles County Museum of Art Master Plan, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2019 • Vine/Afton/DeLong pre, Los Angeles CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2019 • Rose Hill Courts, Los Angeles, CEQA/NEPA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2019 • Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2019 • Figueroa and Flower, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2019 • 913 S. Figueroa, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2019 • 222 W. 2nd Street, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2018 • Olympic and Hill, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Report, 2018 • City of Hope Master Plan, Duarte, CEQA Historical Resource Report, 2017 • 8th and Figueroa Tower, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Report, 2017 • John Anson Ford Theatres, Los Angeles County, CEQA Historical Resource Report, 2015 • LA Biomed Master Plan, Torrance, CEQA Historical Resource Report, 2014 • May Company, Laurel Plaza, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Report, 2014 • United Artist Theater, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Report, 2013 • Claremont Graduate University Master Plan, CEQA Historical Resource Report, 2013 Im Agreement No. 5693 APPENDIX A �; A LAURA O'NEIL.I_ is a Senior Architectural Historian and Designer at GPA. She has been involved in the field of historic preservation since 2006. Laura graduated California State Polytechnic University in Pomona with a Master of Architecture. She has since worked in private historic preservation consulting in California. Laura joined GPA in 2008 and has experience in providing property owners with expert guidance in the rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of historic buildings. She has skillfully prepared Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit and Mills Act applications, Historic Structure Reports, and Secretary of the Interior's Standards analyses. Laura has managed the preparation of environmental compliance documents in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, National Environmental Quality Act, and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for numerous transportation projects throughout California. She is also experienced in conducting historic resources surveys and preparing historic context statements. Educational ac ro • M.Arch. I, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, 2009 • B.A., Political Science, Lehigh University, 2002 Professional Exerie ce: • GPA Consulting, Senior Architectural Historian and Designer, 2008 -Present • Philadelphia Historical Commission, Graduate Intern, 2008 • California State Polytechnic University, Graduate Assistant, 2007-2008 Qualifications: • Meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for history, architectural history, and historic architecture pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 61, Appendix A. Professional Activities: • Santa Monica Landmarks Commissioner, 2014-2018 Sellecfed Projects: • Los Angeles County Museum of Art Master Plan, Los Angeles County, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2019 • Shoemaker Bridge Replacement Project, Long Beach, Section 106 Historical Resource Evaluation Report and FOE, 2018 • 1718 N. Vine Street, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2018 • 91/605, Los Angeles County, Section 106, Historical Resources Evaluation Report, 2017 • Villa Carlotta, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2016 • Mira Loma Detention Center Women's Facility, Los Angeles County, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2016 • Nelles Correctional Facility Specific Plan, Whittier, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2015 • Evanston Inn, Pasadena, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2013 • 500 Broadway, Santa Monica, CEQA Historical Resource Evaluation Report, 2013 • 21200 Victory Boulevard, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Evaluation Report, 2013 • 1318 2nd Street, Santa Monica, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2012 • 213 Pomona Avenue, Fullerton, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2012 • House of Hope, Duarte, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2010 • Moore House, Palos Verdes Estates, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2010 • Hollywood Center Studios, Los Angeles, Historical Resources Evaluation Report, 2010 Agreement No. 5693 APPENOix A ]ENNA KACH[)"),R is o Senior Preservation Planner of GPA. She has been involved hlthe field ofhistoric preservation since 20l0.Jenna graduated from the University ofSouthern California with oMosfarof Planning and a Certificate in Historic Preservation. She has since worked in private urban planning and historic preservation consulting in California. Jenna joined GPA in 2013 and has skillfully supervised historic resources son^e\n and the preparation of environmental compliance documents inaccordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for numerous transportation projects throughout California. She is particularly experienced in working with Caltrans and local agencies in the preparation of environmental compliance documents for the Local Assistance Program. Jenna is also experienced in the preparation of environmental compliance documents in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and National Environmental Quality Act. Educational Background: ^ Most erof Planning, University of Southern California, 2007 ^ Certificate, HidohcPreservation, University ofSouthern California, 2]07 ^ 8.S.'Public Policy, Management and Planning, University ofSouthern California, 2007 Professional Experience: ^ GPA Consulting, Senior Preservation P|anner,2Ul3'Pnesent ^ Pasadena Herdoge'Preservation Director, 2010-2013 ^ Deborah Murphy Urban Design + Planning, Planner, 2O89-20lO ^ Brovvn/k»eohu|'Inc. Land Use Consultants, Assistant Project Manager, 2OO6-20UP Qualifications: ^ Meets theSecretary oftheInterior's Professional Qualifications Standards for architectural history pursuant tothe Code ofFederal Regulations, 36CFR Part 6l'Appendix A. ~ National Preservation Institute, Section lUd:/\nIntroduction Selected Projects: " High Speed Rail, Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section, CEQA/NEPAHistorical Resource Technical Report, 2Ol6-20l8 - Figueroa &Flower, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2Ul8 °9493.Hope Street, Los Angeles, CEC>/\ Historical Resource Technical Report, 2Ol7 ~ Olympic & Figueroa, Los Angeles, CEQA HistVriico|Resource Technical Report, 2Ol7 - l442-J2Tamarind Avenue, Los Angeles, CEQAHistorical Resources Evaluation Report, 2016 ~ l336-l40OGordon Street, Los Angeles, CEC>A Histohoa| Resources Evaluation Report, 2016 - Sunset Junction, Los Angeles, CEQAHistoCico| Resource Evaluation Report, 2Dl6 ~ Main Street Bridge Replacement, Sutter Creek, CEQA/NEPAHistorical Resource Technical Report, 2Dl4 - Avenue 66Grade Separation, Riverside County, CEQA/NEPAHixtohco|Resource Technical Report, 20l5 ° 6mStreet Bicycle Lane, Long Beach, CEQA/NEPAHistorical Resource Technical Report, 2014 - Daisy Avenue Bicycle Lane, Long Beach, CE0A/NEPAHistorical Resource Technical Report, 2014 ~ Sunset & Everett, Los Angeles, Historical Resources Evaluation Report, 2Ol4 [EA Agreement No. 5693 APPENDIX A " L..Ir;..; u u tA, IL..`[ ..)I '; is an Associate Architectural Historian at GPA. She has been involved in the field of historic preservation since 2007. Allison graduated from Columbia University with a Master of Science in Historic Preservation. She has since worked in private historic preservation consulting in California. Allison joined GPA in 2015 and her experience has included the preparation of environmental compliance documents in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act; Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record recordation; large-scale historic resources surveys; Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit and Mills Act applications; local landmark applications; and evaluations of eligibility for a wide variety of projects and property types throughout California. She is also highly experienced in writing National Register of Historic Places nominations as well as historic context statements for local governments. Educational Background: ■ M.S., Historic Preservation, Columbia University, 2010 • B.A., European Studies, Scripps College, 2006 Professional Experience: • GPA Consulting, Associate Architectural Historian, 2015 -Present • Chattel Inc., Associate Architectural Historian, 2013-2015 • Architectural Resources Group, Architectural Historian, 2010-2013 • Mellon Graduate Fellowship in Primary Sources, Columbia University, 2009-2010 Qualifications: • Meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for history and architectural history pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 61, Appendix A. • Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Section 106 Essentials Professional Activities: • Urban Land Institute, Young Leader's Group, 2014 -Present • Graduate School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation at Columbia University, Alumni Board Member, 2013 - Present SelectedProjects: • Morrison Hotel, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2018 • Angels Landing, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2018 • 3003 Runyon Canyon, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2018 • Highland Park Jr. Art Center, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Evaluation Report, 2018 • Sunset & Western, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2017 • Hollywood Roosevelt, Los Angeles, Preservation Plan, 2017 • Farmers & Merchants Bank Building, Los Angeles, Preservation Plan, 2017 • Postwar Development and Architecture in Fremont Historic Context Statement, 2017 • Los Angeles Wholesale Flower Terminal, Los Angeles, Historical Resource Evaluation Report, 2017 • City of Hope Master Plan, Duarte, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2017 • Vermont Corridor Development, Historical Resources Evaluation Report, 2017 • Art Center College of Design Master Plan, Pasadena, CEQA Historical Resource Report, 2016 • 2222 S. Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2016 • 1440-52 Gordon Street, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Evaluation Report, 2016 • 8430 Reseda Boulevard, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Evaluation Report, 2016 13 Agreement No. 5693 APPENDIX A S AMANDA DiJANF is an Associate Architectural Historian at GPA. She has been involved in the field of historic preservation since 2011. Amanda graduated from Savannah College of Art and Design with a Bachelor of Fine Arts in Historic Preservation. She has since worked in private historic preservation consulting in California. Amanda joined GPA in 2012 and her experience has included the preparation of environmental compliance documents in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act; Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record recordation; large-scale historic resources surveys; Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit and Mills Act applications; National Register of Historic Place nominations; local landmark applications; historic context statements; and evaluations of eligibility for a wide variety of projects and property types throughout California. She is experienced in working with local governments to develop design guidelines for administering local design review. Educational Background: • B.F.A, Historic Preservation, Savannah College of Art and Design, 2011 Professional Experience: • GPA Consulting, Associate Architectural Historian, 2012 -Present • Architectural Resources Group, Intern, 2012 • City of Los Angles, Office of Historic Resources, Intern, 2011-2012 Qualifications: • Meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for architectural history pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 61, Appendix A. • National Preservation Institute, Section 106: An Introduction Professional Activities: • California Preservation Foundation Conference Programs Committee, 2017 Selected Projects: • High Speed Rail, Los Angeles to Burbank, CEQA/NEPA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2016-2018 • Rose Hill Courts, Los Angeles, CEQA/NEPA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2019 • 847-97 W. 10th Street, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Evaluation Report, 2018 • Oakwood School Master Plan, Los Angeles, Historical Resource Technical Report, 2016 • Villa Carlotta, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2016 • Mira Loma Detention Center Women's Facility, Los Angeles County, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2016 • Commonwealth Nursery, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2016 • City Market of Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2015 • 732 S. Spring Street, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2015 • 1000 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2015 • LA Biomed, Torrance, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2014 • Willys Knight Building, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2013 • High Desert Corridor, Los Angeles County, Historical Resource Evaluation Report, Section 106 Review, 2013 • Claremont Graduate University Master Plan, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2013 14 Agreement No. 5693 /\PPEND|X/\ banAssociate Architectural Historian ctGPA. She has been involved in the field of historic preservation since 2011. Emily graduated from Columbia University with o Master ofScience in Historic Preservation, receiving the school's highest honor for her thesis work. She has since worked inprivate architecture and historic preservation consulting inboth theNew York metropolitan area and California. Erni|yjoinedGPA in2Ol7and her expmriiencehas included the preparation of environmental compliance documents in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and Section l06ofthe National Historic Preservation Act; Historic Structure Reports; |000| landmark nominations; Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit and Mills Act applications; historic context statements; large-scale historic resource surveys; andevm|uotionsofe|igibilityforavvidevohetyofpnojectsondpropertytypesthn)ughout8outhem California. She is also experienced in providing property owners with expert guidance in the rehabilitation and restoration of hisfohc buildings, having completed numerous projects in New York and Los Angeles. Educational Background: ~ M.S., Histohc Preservation, Columbia University, 2013 ° B.A.' History, New York University, 2OO9 • 8.A.'Political Science, New York University, 2009 Professional Experience: ~ GPA Consulting, Associate Architectural Historian, 201 7 -Present " Building Conservation Associates, |nc, HistohoPreservationist, 20l5-2Ol7 " Avery Drawings & Archives, Columbia University, Graduate Intern, 2012-2013 ~ O000momo'US, Intern, 2Ul2 Qualifications: " Meets the Secretary ofthe Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for history and architectural history pursuant tothe Code ofFederal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 6l'Appendix A. Professional Activities: ° Vernacular Architecture Fomrn' Image Editor for Buildings & Landscapes, 2Ul4 Present Selected Projects: " Shoemaker Bridge, Long Beach, Section l06 Historical Resources Evaluation Report, 2Ul8 ^ l 100 E.5th Street, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2Dl7 " 676h1oteoStreet, Los Angeles, CE0A Historical Resource Technical Report, 2Ol7 ~ 3l4-l8Firmin Street, Los Angeles, Hixtohoo| Resource Evaluation Report, 2Ol7 ^ 401 S. Hewitt Street, Los Angeles CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2Ol7 " Stock Exchange, Los Angeles, Pnasamof|on Plan, Inferior, 2Ul7 ~ JoonnesBrothers Company Building, Los Angeles, Historic -Cultural Monument Application, 2017 " 91/605' Los Angeles County, Section 106' Historical Resources Evaluation Report, 2Ul7 ~ Truxtun/DmkIntersection Operational Improvements, Bakersfield, Section 106 Historical Resources Evaluation Report, 2Ol7 ~ Southington HistorioInventory Survey, Southington, Connecticut, 20l6-2Ol7 " Windsor Locks Readiness Center, Windsor Locks, Connecticut, Exhibit Sign, 20l6 ^ Histohc Preservation Bement of the Township Master Plan for Montclair, New Jersey' 2016 ^ Edward Ridley & Sons Department Store, New York, Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Application, 2015-2016 ^ Historic Resource Inventory Survey ofMidtown Manhattan, New York, 2Dl5-2Ol6 ~ Washington Union Station, Washington, O.C, Historic Preservation Plan, 2Ol5 UN Agreement No. 5693 APPENDIX A L..Ysq k/\ P,` J.L�S7i l: is an Associate Architectural Historian at GPA. She has been involved in the field of historic preservation since 2009. Elysha graduated from the University of Southern California with a Master of Historic Preservation. She has since worked in non-profit and private historic preservation consulting in California. Elysha joined GPA in 2010 and I' her experience has included the preparation of environmental compliance documents in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act; I „ Historic Structure Reports; Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record recordation; large-scale historic resources surveys; National Register of Historic Places nominations; local landmark nominations; and evaluations of eligibility for a wide variety of projects and property types throughout California. She has also completed numerous context statements on a wide array of property types and historic themes. Educational Background: • Master of Historic Preservation, University of Southern California, 2010 B.A., History, College of William and Mary, 2008 Professional Experience: • GPA Consulting, Associate Architectural Historian, 2018 -Present • SWCA, Architectural Historian, 2018 • GPA Consulting, Architectural Historian II, 2010-2015 • City of Los Angeles Office of Historic Resources, Intern, 2010-2011 • Los Angeles Conservancy, Graduate Intern, 2010 • Pasadena Heritage, Graduate Intern, 2009-2010 • National Trust for Historic Preservation, Intern, 2009 Qualifications: • Meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for history and architectural history pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 61, Appendix A. Professional Activities: • Los Angeles County Historical Landmarks and Records Commission, 2013-2017 Selected Projects: • World Trade Center, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Evaluation Report, 2018 • Mira Loma Detention Center Women's Facility, Los Angeles County, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2016 • City Market of Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2015 • 1 1 1 1 N. Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, National Register Nomination, 2013 • 1 121 N. Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, National Register Nomination, 2013 • Old Vallejo City Hall, National Register Nomination, 2013 • Old Vallejo Masonic Temple, National Register Nomination, 2013 • Hotel Rosslyn Annex, Los Angeles, National Register Nomination, 2013 • Willys Knight Building, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2013 • 500 Broadway, Santa Monica, CEQA Historical Resource Evaluation Report, 2013 • Claremont Graduate University Master Plan, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2013 • Be[ Air/Beverly Crest Historic Resource Survey, SurveyLA, 2012-2013 • 1335 East Grand Avenue, Pomona, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2011 • 1717 Gramercy Place, Hollywood, CEQA Historical Resource Evaluation Report, 2011 • Jack's Restaurant, Whittier, CEQA Historical Resource Evaluation Report, 2011 IV Agreement No. 5693 APPENDIX A n!'ifi� A I `.K";yi" Ni1,, EN'.; is an Architectural Historian II at GPA. She has been involved in the field of historic preservation since 2013. Audrey graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with a Master of Science in Historic Preservation and City Planning where she focused on preservation planning and community economic development. She has since worked in private historic preservation consulting in California. Audreyjoined GPA in 2017 and her experience has included the preparation of environmental compliance documents in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act; historic context statements; Secretary of the Interior's Standards analysis; large-scale historic resource surveys; and evaluations of eligibility for a wide variety of projects and property types throughout Southern California. Audrey is also experienced in coordinating with property owners and local governments in the preparation and review of Mills Act applications and the inspection and reporting of properties applying for or with existing Mills Act contracts. Educational Background: • M.S., Historic Preservation, University of Pennsylvania, 2016 • Master of City Planning, University of Pennsylvania, 2016 • B.A., Architectural Studies, University of Pittsburgh, 2013 • B.A., Urban Studies, University of Pittsburgh, 2013 Professional x erie ce: • GPA Consulting, Architectural Historian Il, 2017 -Present • Heritage Consulting, Inc., Intern, 2015- 2016 • Tacony Community Development Corp., Intern, 2014 • Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation, Intern, 2013 • University of Pittsburgh, Teaching Assistant, 2012-2013 • City of Pittsburgh Planning Department, Intern, 2012 • Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership, Intern, 2011 Qualifications: • Meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for history and architectural history pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 61, Appendix A. Selected Projects: • CF Braun & Company Plant, Alhambra, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2018 • Westlake 619, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2018 • Broadway Federal, Midtown Branch, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2018 • High Speed Rail, Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section, CEQA/NEPA Historical Resource Techncial Report, 2017-2018 • Golden Avenue Bridge Replacement, Section 106 Historical Resources Evaluation Report, 2017 • Los Angeles Mills Act Program, Inspection Reports, 2017 • Laguna Beach Mills Act Program, Application Reports, 2017 • 91/605, Los Angeles County, Section 106 Historical Resources Evaluation Report, 2017 • Vine/Afton/DeLongpre, Los Angeles CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2017 • Sunset & Western, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2017 • Vermont Corridor, Los Angeles, CEQA Historical Resource Technical Report, 2017 • Hollywood Roosevelt, Los Angeles, Preservation Plan, 2017 • Farmers & Merchants Bank Building, Los Angeles, Preservation Plan, 2017 • SurveyLA, African American Historic Context Statement, 2017 • Hughes Industrial Historic District Interpretive Program, 2017 17 APPENDIX A 1 Principal Architectural Historian Senior Architectural Historian Associate Architectural Historian Architectural Historian II Architectural Historian I Historian II Historian I GIS Analyst Administrative Assistant/ Clerical Agreement No. 5693 $200.00/hour $150.00/hour $125.00/hour $110.00/hour $100.00/ hour $110.00/hour $100.00/hour $125.00/hour $70.00/ hour Karin Liljegren Principal OnnQivning 724S.Spring Street, Suite 5Ol Los Angeles, CA9UOl4 213-596-5602 MancosVelayos Partner Park &Ve|oyo 8OlS.Figueroa Street, Suite 45O Los Angeles, CA9OOl7 213-570-8000 JohmGullixson Vice President, Development, Western Region Syde|| Group LTD 527VV.7th Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA9O0l4 213-631-3719 Kevin Johnson Design and Historic Preservation City ofPasadena l76N.Garfield Avenue Pasadena, CA9l101 626-744-7806 LauraDoergse Vice President, Design and Construction ClarettWest Development l90lAvenue cfthe Stars Los Angeles, CA90O67 310-807-8405 Lambert Giessinger Historic Preservation Architect Office ofHistoric Resources 221 N. Figueroa Street, 5uite 1350 Los Angeles, CA9OOl2 213-847-3651 Christopher Koo b Planning Manager City ofLong Beach 333VV.Ocean Boulevard, 5th Floor Long Beach, CA9OOO2 562-570-6288 � | A Z Agreement No. 5693 Wode0llefer Principal KUkafer-Flarnmong'Architeotx |625Olympic Boulevard Santa Monica, CA9O4O4 310-399-7975 Ed Casey ronner Alston &Bird 333%.Hope Street, l6mFloor Los Angeles, CA9OOl7 213-576-1005 Craig Lawson President Craig Lawson & Company 322lHutchinson Avenue, Suite D Los Angeles, CA 90034 310-838-2400 80Ruochan Principal RoschenVan Cleve Architects 20l2Hyperion Avenue Los Angeles, CA9UO27 323-665-0074 Brenda Levin Principal Levin & Associates Architect 7O0S,Flower Street, Suite 7UO Los Angeles, CA90Ol7 213-623-8141 Ooke Goldsmith Partner Armbruster Goldsmith & Delvac l2l0DWilshire Boulevard, Suite l6OU Los Angeles, CA9UO25 318-209'8800 John Keho Interim Director, Planning and Development City ofWest Hollywood 830OSanta Monica Boulevard West Hollywood, CA 90069 323-848-6393