CONTRACT 5666 Professional Services Agreement CLOSED Agreement No. 5666
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
l�
This AGREEMENT is entered into and takes effect this day of�' "k�" )�'�la"f�'2019 by
and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,a general law city and nninicipal corporatioi ("CITY")
and MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation
("CONSULTANT"). The parties agree as follows:
1. CONSIDERATION.
A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the
SCOPE OF SERVICES,below;
B. As additional consideration,CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms
and conditions contained in this Agreement;
C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a sum not to
exceed seven thousand eight hundred ninety-one dollars ($7,891) for
CONSULTANT's services over the course of the term of this Agreement. CITY
may modify this amount as set forth below. Unless otherwise specified by written
amendment to this Agreement, CITY will pay this sum as specified in the attached
Exhibit A,which is incorporated by reference. Any payment to CONSULTANT in
excess of$50,000 over the course of the term of this Agreement must be approved
by CITY's city council.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
A. CONSULTANT will perforin services listed in the attached Exhibit A, which is
incorporated herein.
B. CONSULTANT will, using a standard of care equal to, or greater than, the degree
of skill and diligence ordinarily used by reputable professionals, with a level of
experience and training similar to CONSULTANT, performing under
circumstances similar to those required by this Agreement, furnish all of the labor,
technical., administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and
materials, equipment,printing,vehicles, transportation, office space and facilities,
and all tests, testing and analyses, calculation, and all other means whatsoever,
except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY as specified
in Exhibit A, Scope of Services, necessary or proper to perform and complete the
work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this
Agreement.
3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement,
CONSULTANT must submit a detailed invoice to CITY that lists the tasks performed, the
Agreement No. 5666
percentage of the task completed during the billing period, and the cumulative percentage
completed for each task. Upon receipt of a properly submitted invoice, CITY shall make payment
to CONSULTANT within thirty(30) days.
4. POLITICAL REFORM ACT. CONSULTANT agrees that it will be considered a public
official subject to the Political Reform Act of 1974 for purposes of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT agrees and warrants that it has no financial interests which may be materially
affected by the project(s) for which it is performing services. Such financial interests may include,
without limitation, interests in business entities, real property, or sources of income exceeding
$500 received within the past year. CONSULTANT further warrants that, before executing this
Agreement, it reviewed the Political Reform Act of 1974 and the Fair Political Practices
Commission regulations, including, without limitation, Chapter 7 of Title 2 of the California
Administrative Code, Section 18700, et seq.,in order to determine whether any conflict of interest
would require CONSULTANT to refrain from performing the services or in any way attempting
to use its official position to influence the governmental decisions underlying the subject
project(s).
5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK.
A. By executing this Agreement,CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has
i. Thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be
performed;
ii. Carefully considered how the services should be performed; and
iii. Understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending
performance of the services under this Agreement.
B. If services involve work upon any site, CONSULTANT represents that
CONSULTANT has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted
with the conditions there existing, before commencing the services hereunder.
Should CONSULTANT discover any latent or unknown conditions that may
materially affect the performance of the services, CONSULTANT will
immediately inform CITY of such fact and will not proceed except at
CONSULTANT's own risk until written instructions are received from CITY.
6. KEY PERSONNEL. CITY understands and agrees that CONSULTANT may subcontract
out some of the work described in this Agreement to a sub-consultant. In the event CITY objects
to the continued involvement with this Agreement by any other person selected by
CONSULTANT to perform services under this AGREEMENT,CONSULTANT agrees that it will
replace such persons with individuals that are agreed to by CITY.
7. TERM. The term of this Agreement will be from the beginning date of this Agreement until
until September 30,2019.Unless otherwise determined by written amendment between the parties,
this Agreement will terminate in the following instances:
A. Completion of the work specified in Exhibit"A";
Page 2 of 12
Agreement No. 5666
B. Termination as stated in Section 15,
8. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. CONSULTANT will not perform any work under this
Agreement until:
A. CONSULTANT furnishes proof of insurance as required by this Agreement; and
B. CITY gives CONSULTANT a written Notice to Proceed.
C. Should CONSULTANT begin work on any phase in advance of receiving written
authorization to proceed, any such professional services are at CONSULTANT's
own risk.
9. TIME EXTENSIONS. Should CONSULTANT be delayed by causes beyond
CONSULTANT's control, CITY may grant a time extension for the completion of the contracted
services. If delay occurs, CONSULTANT must notify CITY within 48 hours, in writing, of the
cause and the extent of the delay and how such delay interferes with the Agreement's schedule.
CITY may,but is not required to,extend the completion time,when appropriate,for the completion
of the contracted services.
10. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this
Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the
contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing,
executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the
services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties.
11. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a
Taxpayer Identification Number.
12. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT, at its sole expense, will obtain and maintain
during the term of this Agreement, all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be
required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement.
13. PROJECT COORDINATION AND SUPERVISION.
A. Albert V. Warot will be responsible for negotiations and contractual matters with
CITY's Project Manager.
B. John Bellas will be assigned as Project Director to over see the work. Margo
Nayyar will be assigned as Project Manager and will be responsible for job
performance and coordination with CITY's Project Manager.
C, Crreuu McClain. Planning Manager, will be assigned as CITY's Project Manager
and will be personally in charge of and personally supervise or perform the
technical execution of the Project on a day-to-day basis on behalf of CITY and will
maintain direct communication with CONSULTANT.
Page 3 of 12
Agreement No. 5666
14. WAIVER. CITY's review or acceptance of, or payment for, work product prepared by
CONSULTANT under this Agreement will not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights
CITY may have under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising from CONSULTANT's
performance. A waiver by CITY of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained in
this Agreement will not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any
other term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement, whether of the same or different
character.
15. TERMINATION.
A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time
with or without cause. Notice of termination will be in writing.
B. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement at any time with CITY's mutual
consent. Notice will be in writing at least thirty days before the effective
termination date.
C. Should termination occur, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT
will,at CITY's option, become CITY's property, and CONSULTANT will receive
just and equitable compensation for any work rendered in accordance with the
terms and conditions of this agreement up to the effective date of notice of
termination, not to exceed the total costs under Section 1(C).
D. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure
on its own terms services similar to those terminated.
E. By executing this document, CONSULTANT waives any and all claims for
damages that might otherwise arise from CITY's termination under this Section.
16. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, models,
photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement are CITY's property.
CONSULTANT may retain copies of said documents and materials as desired,but will deliver all
original materials to CITY upon CITY's written notice.CITY agrees that use of CONSULTANT's
completed work product,for purposes other than identified in this Agreement,or use of incomplete
work product, is at CITY's own risk.
17. PUBLICATION OF DOCUMENTS. Except as necessary for performance of service under
this Agreement, no copies, sketches, or graphs of materials, including graphic art work,prepared
pursuant to this Agreement,will be released by CONSULTANT to any other person or city without
CITY's prior written approval. All press releases, including graphic display information to be
published in newspapers or magazines, will be approved and distributed solely by CITY, unless
otherwise provided by written agreement between the parties.
18. INDEMNIFICATION.
A. CONSULTANT agrees to the following:
Page 4 of 12
Agreement No. 5666
i. Indemnification for Professional Services. CONSULTANT will save
harmless and indemnify, including, without limitation, CITY's defense
costs (including reasonable attorney's fees), from and against any and all
suits, actions, or claims, of any character whatever, brought for, or on
account of, any injuries or damages sustained by any person or property
resulting or arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission
by CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT's officers, agents,
employees,or representatives,in the perforinance of this Agreement,except
for such loss or damage arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful
misconduct.
ii, Indemnification for other Damages.CONSULTANT indemnifies and holds
CITY harmless from and against any claim, action, damages, costs
(including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees), injuries, or
liability, arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, except for such
loss or damage arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful misconduct.
Should CITY be named in any suit,or should any claim be brought againstit
by suit or otherwise, whether the same be groundless or not, arising out of
this Agreement, or its performance, CONSULTANT will defend CITY (at
CITY's request and with counsel satisfactory to CITY)and will indemnify
CITY for any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in
settlement or otherwise.
B. For purposes of this section "CITY" includes CITY's officers, officials and
employees.
C. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions will survive
termination of this Agreement.
D. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained
by CONSULTANT as required by Section 22, and any approval of said insurance
by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the
liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this
Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning
indemnification.
19. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT's professional services.
CONSULTANT's attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY's
written approval are prohibited and will be null and void.
20. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT
will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is
it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other
employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY
and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY
provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the
right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of
Page 5 of 12
Agreement No. 5666
control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end
results of the work only.
21. AUDIT OF RECORDS.
A. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY,or designee, has the right to review,obtain, and
copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT
agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and
will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice,
during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and
inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may
be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining
compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such
records for a period of three years following final payment under this Agreement.
B. Upon inspection, CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective
measures required by CITY regarding the requirements of this Section.
CONSULTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time to implement said
corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective
measures will result in immediate termination of this Agreement.
C. CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining
to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement.
22. INSURANCE.
A. Before commencing perforinance under this Agreement, and at all other times this
Agreement is effective, CONSULTANT must procure and maintain the following
types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum, with the limits
set forth below:
TVI)e Of insurance Limits(combined sinele)
Commercial general liability: $2,000,000
Professional Liability $1,000,000
Business automobile liability $1,000,000
Workers compensation Statutory requirement.
B. Commercial general liability insurance will meet or exceed the requirements of the
most recent ISO-CGL Form. The amount of insurance set forth above will be a
combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and
property damage for the policy coverage. Liability policies will be endorsed to
name CITY, its officials, and employees as "additional insureds" under said
insurance coverage and to state that such insurance will be deemed"primary" such
that any other insurance that may be carried by CITY will be excess thereto. Such
endorsement must be reflected on ISO Form No. CG 20 10 11 85 or 88, or
equivalent. Such insurance will be on an "occurrence," not a "claims made," basis
and will not be cancelable or subject to reduction except upon 30 days prior written
notice to CITY
Page 6 of 12
Agreement No. 5666
C. Automobile coverage will be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00
01 06 92, including symbol 1 (Any Auto) or an acceptable equivalent.
D. Professional liability coverage will be on an occurrence basis if such coverage is
available,or on a claims made basis if not available. When coverage is provided on
a claims made basis, CONSULTANT will continue to maintain the insurance in
effect for a period of three years after this Agreement expires or is terminated
("extended insurance"). Such extended insurance will have the same coverage and
limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will
cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by City arising out of any errors or
omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time
this Agreement was in effect.
E. CONSULTANT will furnish to City duly authenticated Certificates of Insurance
evidencing maintenance of the insurance required under this Agreement,
endorsements as required herein, and such other evidence of insurance or copies of
policies as may be reasonably required by City from time to time. Insurance must
be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best Company Rating equivalent to at
least a Rating of"AMI.'°
F. Should CONSULTANT, for any reason, fail to obtain and maintain the insurance
required by this Agreement, City may terminate.
23. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when
received by such party at its respective name and address as follows:
CITY: CONSULTANT:
El Segundo Planning &Building Safety Dept. Michael Baker International
350 Main Street 3760 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 270
El Segundo, CA 90245-3813 Long Beach, CA 90806
Attention: Gregg McClain, Planning Manager Attention: Albert V. Warot,Associate Vice
President
310-524-2393 (562)200-7165
gmeelain@elsegundo.org awarot@mbakerintl.com
Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by
the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly
addressed as noted above. In all other instances,notices will be deemed given at the time of actual
delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be
given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph.
24. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor
retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, to solicit or
secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to
pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting
Page 7 of 12
Agreement No. 5666
from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this
warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability.
25. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES.This Agreement and every provision herein is generally
for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party.
There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT's or CITY's
obligations under this Agreement.
26. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this
agreement will be in Los Angeles County or in the Federal District Court in the District of
California in which Los Angeles County is located.
27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Exhibits, sets forth the entire
understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements
expressed or implied, oral or written. There are two Exhibits to this Agreement. This Agreement
will bind and inure to the benefit of the parties to this Agreement and any subsequent successors
and assigns.
28. CONSISTENCY. In interpreting this Agreement and resolving any ambiguities, the main
body of this Agreement takes precedence over the attached Exhibits; this Agreement supersedes
any conflicting provisions. Any inconsistency between the Exhibits will be resolved in the order
in which the Exhibits appear below:
A. Exhibit A: Proposal for Services/Scope of Work and Budget;
B. Exhibit B: Resumes.
29. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this
Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly,this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole,
and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party.
30. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable,then such portion will be deemed modified to the extent
necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and, as so modified, such
portion and the balance of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect.
31. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION.The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action
has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage
in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment signed by
both parties. CITY's city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of
CITY.
32. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT; COUNTERPARTS; ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES.
This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an
original and all of which will constitute one and the same instrument. The Parties agree that this
Agreement, agreements ancillary to this Agreement, and related documents to be entered into in
connection with this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is
delivered by electronic mail in "portable document fonnat" (i.e., .pdf) fonn, or by facsimile
Page 8 of 12
Agreement No. 5666
transmission. Such signature will be deemed to be and treated in all respects as an original
signature.
33. COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS. The parties agree that all of the provisions hereof will
be construed as both covenants and conditions, the same as if the words importing such covenants
and conditions had been used in each separate paragraph.
34. CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs of this Agreement are for convenience of
reference only and will not affect the interpretation of this Agreement.
35. FORCE MAJEURE. In no event shall either CONSULTANT or the CITY have any claim or
right against the other for any failure of performance where such failure of performance is caused by
or is the result of causes beyond the reasonable control of the other party due to any occurrence
commonly known as a "force majeure," including, but not limited to: acts of God; fire, flood, or
other natural catastrophe; acts of any governmental body, labor dispute or shortage; national
emergency; insurrection; riot; or war.
36. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT
represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity
to perform the Agreement using a standard of care equal to,or greater than, the degree of skill and
diligence ordinarily used by reputable professionals,with a level of experience and training similar
to CONSULTANT,performing under circumstances similar to those required by this Agreement.
CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service
experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private
consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is
capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and
effectively with and to satisfy a public agency.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
Page 9 of 12
Agreement No. 5666
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and
year first hereinabove written.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
a lcity a NPenns'yWlvanfia Corporation
V (A
Ger, Albert V. Warot
Cir Associate Vice President
ATTEST
i Taxpayer ID No. 25-1228638
Tracy Weaver,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
��for �, o
Mark D. Hensley 6
City Attorney
Page 10 of 12
Agreement No. 5666
Exhibit A: Proposal for Services/Scope of Work
and Budget
Agreement No. 5666
• ' We Moke o Difference
I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L
December 11,2018
Paul Samaras,Principal Planner
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
50 Main Street
EI Segundo,CA 90245
RE: PROPOSAL TO CONDUCT THE CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION
EFFORTS FOR THE INFINEON DEVELOPMENT PROJECT,EL SEGUNDO,CALIFORNIA
Dear Mr.Samaras:
Per your request, we have prepared the attached proposal to conduct the cultural resources
identification and evaluation efforts required for the Infineon Development Project in EI Segundo,
California.Our proposed scope of work,schedule,and budget are attached to this letter.
Thank you for the opportunity to propose on this assignment. We would welcome the opportunity to
assist the City with this project.Michael Baker International has staff resources available to start on the
project immediately with the City of EI Segundo's approval and authorization.If you have any questions
or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (562) 200-7170 or
ibellasambakerintl.com.
Sincerely,
John Bellas
Senior Associate
Attachment:Scope of Services,Schedule,Fee,and Key Staff Biographies
M13AKFRIN11 CUM
„I ij
Agreement No. 5666
City of EI Segundo
RE:Proposal to Conduct the Cultural Resources Identification and Evaluation EfForts for the Infineon
Development Project,EI Segundo,California
Page 2
SCOPE OF SERVICES
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
As part of the Infineon Development Project(project), a developer is purchasing a property consisting
of two blocks totaling approximately 226,511 square feet.
Block 1 is bound by Franklin Avenue on the south, Kansas Street on the east, California Street on the
west, and Grand Avenue on the north, and includes a total of six buildings. The following is a list of
buildings with built dates and proposed project activities:
1410 Grand Avenue(APN 4139-006-0555)
The building was constructed in 1946.Project plans include interior remodeling.No demolition
is proposed.
236 California Street/1410 Franklin Street(APN 4139-006-058)
The building was constructed in 1951.Project plans include interior remodeling.No demolition
is proposed.
232 California Street(APN 4139-006-059)
The building was constructed in 1981.Project plans include interior remodeling.No demolition
is proposed.
1401 East Franklin Avenue(APN 4139-006-060)
The building was constructed in 1973.Project plans include interior remodeling.No demolition
is proposed.
233 Kansas Street(APN 4139-006-063)
The building was constructed in 1956 and is planned for demolition.
247 Kansas Street(APN 4139-006-064)
The building was constructed in 1948 and is planned for demolition.
Block 2 is bound by Grand Avenue on the south, Kansas Street on the west,Washington Street on the
east, and Holly Avenue on the north, and includes a total of three buildings.The following is a list of
buildings with built dates and proposed project activities:
348 Kansas Street(APN 4139-008-010)
The building was constructed in 1952 and is planned for demolition.
330 Kansas Street(APN 4139-008-056)
The building was constructed in 1980.Project plans include interior remodeling.
318 Kansas Street/1521 East Grand Avenue(APN 4139-008-047)
The building was constructed in 1997.Project plans include interior remodeling.
The three buildings proposed for demolition, 233, 247, and 348 Kansas Street (APNs 4139-006-063,
4139-006-064,and 4139-008-010,respectively)require evaluation to the California Register of Historical
Agreement No. 5666
City of EI Segundo
RE:Proposal to Conduct the Cultural Resources Identification and Evaluation EfForts for the Infineon
Development Project,EI Segundo,California
Page 3
Resources (California Register) because,pursuant to CEQA Section 15064.5,cultural resources 50 years
of age or older must be identified and evaluated for historical significance to identify whether or not a
project proposes impacts to historical resources.
SCOPE
We propose to complete the cultural resources identification and evaluation efforts required to satisfy
CEQA.We will complete the following identification and evaluation efforts:
O South Central Coastal Information Center records search for information related to previously
identified cultural resources within the project area.
O Archival research and historic map review.
O Field survey and photographs required for the California Register evaluations.
0 California Register evaluations of 233, 247, and 348 Kansas Street (APNs 4139-006-063, 4139-
006-064,and 4139-008-010,respectively)on all appropriate DPR 523 forms.
Methods and results of the identification and evaluation efforts will be summarized in a memo that
could be used as the existing conditions information in a cultural resources chapter of any future CEQA
document completed for the project. Note that the impact analysis that would be needed for a CEQA
document is not included in our currently proposed scope of work,as we understand that the project
plans could evolve pending the results of the cultural resources evaluation.
We assume no archaeological survey is required because the project area appears fully paved, and
permission to enter will be provided at notice to proceed.If project plans change to include additional
demolition or exterior alterations of any of the buildings over 50 years of age within Blocks 1 and 2,
California Register evaluations may be required to satisfy CEQA and a budget augment can be prepared.
SCHEDULE
Michael Baker International is committed to completing the cultural resources evaluation in a time
frame that meets the City's needs.Assuming a standard schedule is appropriate,we would complete
the scope of work described above within 6 weeks from Notice to Proceed.
FEE
Michael Baker International is available to complete the scope of work described above for a fee of
$7,891.
KEY STAFF BIOGRAPHIES
John Bellas,Project Manager/Project Advisor,has 19 years of experience and is a recognized expert
in the environmental planning field in Southern California. He has managed the preparation of
numerous CEQA and NEPA documents for a wide range of projects, including land
development/entitlement projects, land use plans/programs, and capital improvement projects. In
addition,he serves as an in-house environmental coordinator/CEQA advisor for several prominent cities
in Southern California.He has also conducted specialized CEQA training programs for client cities,served
as an instructor in AEP's "Advanced CEQA" and "CEQA Essentials" workshops, and presented on CEQA
topics at AEP and APA conferences. Notable, John has extensive CEQA experience with projects that
involve significant historical resources,including:
Agreement No. 5666
City of EI Segundo
RE:Proposal to Conduct the Cultural Resources Identification and Evaluation EfForts for the Infineon
Development Project,EI Segundo,California
Page 4
aw YWCA Adaptive Reuse/Kimpton Hotel Project EIR(reuse of a National Register-eligible YWCA
facility designed by famed architect/landscape architect Julia Morgan),City of Pasadena,EIR Peer
Review and CEQA Oversight
a Hill&Colorado Project EIR(historic Pasadena Ford dealership site),City of Pasadena,EIR Peer
Review and CEQA Oversight
0 3200 Foothill Project Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment(former Naval
Ordinance Testing Station site),City of Pasadena,SCEA Peer Review and CEQA Oversight
Green Hotel Apartments Project EIR(National Register-listed Castle Green property),City of
Pasadena,EIR Peer Review and CEQA Oversight
Evanston Inn Adaptive Reuse Project IS/MND(historic Victorian-era inn property),City of
Pasadena,IS/MND Peer Review and CEQA Oversight
Desiderio Army Reserve Base Reuse Project EIR,City of Pasadena,EIR Peer Review and CEQA
Oversight
Caltech Neurosciences Building/Relocation of Historic Bungalow Court CEQA Document,City of
Pasadena,Peer Review and CEQA Oversight
Mission Place Project EIR(historic elementary school site),South Pasadena Unified School
District/City of South Pasadena,Project Manager
Edinburgh Avenue Small Lot Subdivision EIR(historic bungalow court),City of Los Angeles,EIR Peer
Review
Coresite Project EIR Addendum (adjacent to historic U.S. Post Office Terminal Annex), City of Los
Angeles,EIR Addendum Peer Review
Santa Monica High School Campus Plan EIR(multiple historic buildings on campus),Santa Monica-
Malibu Unified School District,Project Director
Dietz Garage Project EIR(historic auto garage site),City of Ontario,Project Manager
Diamante Terrace Project EIR(historic farmhouse site),City of Ontario,Project Manager
Margo Nayyar,Architectural Historian,has eight years of cultural resources management experience
in California. Her experience includes built environment surveys, evaluation of historic-era resources
using guidelines outlined in the National Registerand the California Register,and preparation of cultural
resources technical studies pursuant to CEQA and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act,
municipal preservation planning and general plan updates, Native American consultation, historic
preservation ordinance updates,grant writing,and provision of Certified Local Government training to
interested local governments. Ms. Nayyar also specializes in producing HABS/HAER/HALS (Historic
American Buildings Survey, Historic American Engineering Record,and Historic American Landscapes
Survey) heritage documentation. She meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification
Standards for history and architectural history.
Nichole Jordan Davis, Cultural Resources Service Lead, is a registered professional archaeologist
(#989208)and meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards archeology and
history, and the Society for California Archaeology's professional qualification standards for Principal
Agreement No. 5666
City of EI Segundo
RE:Proposal to Conduct the Cultural Resources Identification and Evaluation EfForts for the Infineon
Development Project,EI Segundo,California
Page 5
-111............... .........
Investigator.Mrs.Jordan Davis has 14 years of experience in cultural resources management,including
project management, personnel management, Native American consultation, archival research,
laboratory analysis, ethnographic and historical research, field survey, prehistoric and historical
excavation,laboratory analysis,collections management,and GIS applications.She has experience with
cultural and tribal cultural resources issues as they relate to CEQA and NEPA.She directs the preparation
of cultural resources technical studies compliant with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act and CEQA, including studies documenting research, survey, testing, excavation, monitoring, and
evaluation for inclusion in the National Register and California Register.She has worked in California,
Nevada,Oregon,Utah,and Polynesia.
Resumes for these individuals are available upon request.
Agreement No. 5666
Exhibit : Resumes
Agreement No. 5666
INTERNATIONAL
John M. Bellas, LEED AP, ENV SP
Professional Affiliations
Senior Associate/Technical Manager III • Association of Environmental
With 19 years of experience,Mr.Bellas is a recognized expert in the environmental planning Professionals
field in Southern California. He has managed the preparation of numerous CEQA and NEPA • American Planning Association
documents for a wide range of projects, including land development/entitlement projects. • LEED Accredited Professional, U.S
land use plans/programs,and capital improvement projects. In addition, he served as an in- Green Building Council/Green
house/on-call environmental administrator/coordinator for several prominent cities in Building Certification Institute
Southern California. He has also conducted specialized CEQA training programs for client
cities, served as an instructor in AEP's Advanced CEQA and CEQA Essentials series, and • Envision Sustainable Professional,
presented on CEQA topics at AEP and APA conferences Institute for Sustainable
Infrastructure
Education
BS, Environmental Resource Management(Minor in Marine Science) I Pennsylvania State University
Contract Environmental Staff Experience
Mr.Bellas has served as contract environmental staff to the Cities of Pasadena, Los Angeles; Laguna Woods, Blythe, and Santa Clarita.
In this role, he has reviewed numerous environmental documents for technical and legal adequacy and has provided strategic guidance
on CEQA matters. Notable assignments include:
• City of Pasadena, Environmental Coordinator/Administrator: Mr. Bellas has served as the City of Pasadena's environmental
coordinator/administrator for more than 8 years.where he is responsible for all the City's environmental documents.Tasks include
supervising the CEQA process for all projects in the City: reviewing CEQA and NEPA documents prepared by City staff and other
consultants: providing recommendations on the appropriate procedures for complying with CEQA and other environmental
regulations: strategizing with the City Attorney's Office on CEQA matters: reviewing technical studies for adequacy; drafting
comment letters on behalf of the City for projects outside of the City's jurisdiction or for which the City is a responsible agency:
overseeing the preparation posting, and distribution of environmental notices:and participating in public meetings and hearings.
• City of Los Angeles, EIR Peer Review Services: Mr. Bellas leads at team of five senior/principal-level environmental planners that
provide EIR Peer Review Services to the Los Angeles Department of City Planning. In this role, he oversees the EIR process for
major development projects and provides technical review of Initial Studies, SCEAs. Draft EIRs, Final EIRs. and CEQA
Findings/Statements of Overriding Considerations. He also regularly advises the City on CEQA matters. Examples include:
working with the City Attorney's Office to develop an approach to analyzing greenhouse gas emissions in CEQA documents.
providing feedback on the ongoing update of the City's CEQA Thresholds Manual: assisting in the development of a standardized
EIR template: and drafting/compiling standardized regulatory framework language for the City's EIRs.
CEQA Document Project Management Experience
John has managed the preparation of numerous CEQA documents. ranging from program EIRs for community plans, specific plans.
and other land use plans to project-level EIRs and IS/MNDs for land development and public works projects He served as project
manager for the following projects, which represent a limited sample of his experience:
■ County of Santa Barbara, Lnegy and Climate Action Plan LIR
■ South Pasadena Unified School District. Mission Place Project FIR
Agreement No. 5666
INTERNATIONAL
City of South Pasadena. Dog Park IS/MND
City of South Pasadena, Pasadena Avenue Lofts EIR '
City of South Pasadena, Wilson Reservoir Replacement Project IS/MND'
City of Arcadia, Arroyo Pacific Academy Specific Plan IS/MND
City of Pasadena. Villa Esperanza Master Plan IS/MND
City of Pasadena, Housing Element IS/ND
City of Pasadena, 39 Congress Medical Building IS/MND
• City of Pasadena. Caltech Astrophysics Building (Cahill Center) IS/MND"
• City of Pasadena, Monk Hill Treatment Facility IS/MND'
• City of Pasadena. Hahamongna Watershed Park Master Plan CEQA Document'
• City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Lower Hesse Park Master Plan IS/MND
• City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Grandview Park Master Plan IS/MND
IN City of Rolling Hills Estates, United Methodist Church School Project IS/MND
City of Rolling Hills Estates, The Village/Merrill Gardens Project IS/MND
City of Rolling Hills Estates, Chandler Ranch/Rolling Hills Golf Course EIR"
City of Rolling Hills Estates, Peninsula Center Revitalization Project IS/MND
City of Rolling Hills Estates. Butcher Ranch IS/MND'
City of Rolling Hills Estates, Covenant Church Project IS/MND
City of Santa Clarita, Canyon Country Community Center Project IS/MND
City of Santa Clarita, Kaiser Permanente Medical Office Building IS/MND
City of Santa Clarita, Valencia Suites Hotel IS/MND
• City of Santa Clarita, Rent-A-Bin IS/MND
• City of Santa Clarita, Sierra Highway Pedestrian Bridge and Roadway Improvement Project IS/MND
■ City of Santa Clarita. Canyon Brook Estates Project IS/MND
• City of Santa Clarita, Newhall Mixed-Use Project IS/MND and EA/FONSI
City of Laguna Woods, General Plan EIR
City of Laguna Woods, Golden Rain Foundation GPA/ZC IS/MND
City of Laguna Woods. Gate 12 Community Center Improvement Project IS/MND
■ City of Industry. Puente Hills Mall Expansion Project IS/MND
■ City of Industry Chestnut Street Warehouse Project EIR
p City of Morro Bay, Housing Element IS/ND
City of Monterey Park, DoubleTree Hotel IS/MND
City of Westlake Village. Community Park EIR
City of Westlake Village, Opus West Development EIR'
City of Westlake Village. Sunrise Senior Assisted Living LIR'
City of Westlake Village, Russell Ranch Retail Center LIR'
■ City of tornila, Cypress Street Reservoir EA/EIR'
® City of Fontana Summit at Rosena Specific Plan EIR '
City of Ontario Cimarron Redevelopment Project Area Plan EIR, Project Manager'
City of Ontario. Diamante Terrace EIR, Project Manager'
City of Ontario Tessier Work/Live Project FIR. Project Manager'
City of Calimesa. JP Ranch FIR'
®
City of Calimesa, I Tolbert Ranch LIR
Denotes work or projects completed prior to joining Michael Baker International
Agreement No. 5666
KN T E R N A T 1 0 N A L
N� ��
n�oa��� n����ar
'��_ � v
Architectural W^stQr^a°/y-LJh+UFa| Resources Manager
ks. Nayyar isanarchitectural historian with eight years of cultural resources Pr.fe,sunaiAffiliations andService
management experience in California. Her experience includes built
° Ca|Komia{oun�|for�e
environment sunx�s evaluation of historic-era resources using guidelines
Promotion mHistory
outlined in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) and the
California Register of Historical Resources(California Register),and preparation ° Society ofArchitectural Historians
of cultural resources technical studies pursuant to the California Environmental * co|ihonniap»ee^a«on
Quality Act (CEQA) and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Foundation
(NHPA), municipal preservation planning and general plan updates, Native
Awards and Honors
American consultation,historic preservation ordinance updates,and provision
of CLG training to interested local governments.Ms.Nayyar also specializes in ° 2o13.George uramy,nMemorial
producing HABSJHAER/HALS (Historic American Buildings Survey, Historic Prize ioHistoric Preservation.
American Engineering Record, and Historic American Landscapes Survey) Honorable mention for master's
heritage documentation.She meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional thesis mCalifornia State
Qualification Standards for history and architectural history. University,Sacramento,
Department nfHistory.
Education Team Member since zo15
MA,Public History|California State University,Sacramento
BA'History University ofCalifornia,Santa Cruz
Work Experience
City of Pasadena,Decker Court and Gill Court Housing Projects,Cultural Resources Manager.Responsible for
authoring the cultural resources study required for NHPA Section l08compliance.The cultural resources study
summarized the methods and results of the cultural resources identification efforts,including development of the
APE,historic context development,literature review,records search,field survey,and evaluation edone resource
for inclusion in the National Register.The resource was recommended ineligible for listing in the National Register
due to lack of integrity to its period of significance. The Office of Historic Preservation concurred with the
delineation ufthe APE,cultural resource identification efforts,and the eligibility recommendation.The project was
determined to have a finding of no historic properties affected.Findings were incorporated into the Environmental
Assessment completed for the project. The City ofPasadena considered using Horne Investment Partnership
Program(HOME)funds administered by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD)to acquire
a 0.42-acre site and subsequently develop with nine multi-family condominium units in four buildings built around
acentral courtyard.
City of EUMonte,Santa AnitaAvmnumMOwens Way TmnnnhommmProject,Architectural Historian.Authored the
California Register evaluations for six properties including residential and commercial buildings. The resources
were recommended ineligible for listing in the California Register,either individually or as contributors to a historic
Agreement No. 5666
Michae-1 Bakeri
INTERNATIONAL
district,due to a lack of integrity and association with a historic context.Additionally,the resources were evaluated
in accordance with Section 15064.5(a)(2)-(3)of the CEQA Guidelines using the criteria outlined in Section 5024.1
of the California Public Resources Code,and they are not historical resources for the purposes of CEQA.Findings of
the evaluations were incorporated into the IS/MND completed for the project. The project proposed
redevelopment of a 1.81-acre commercial and residential area with a private residential community comprising 38
three-story townhomes and 2 two-story townhomes,with related site improvements and amenities.
City of Pasadena, Chen Neuroscience Research Building Project, Cultural Resources Manager. Conducted
archival research, records search, field survey, archaeological sensitivity assessment, two California Register
evaluations, relocation and restoration plan review, and historic resource impacts assessment in support of
environmental review of the project under CEQA. The project proposed redevelopment of a residential area to
construct a three-story-plus-basement, approximately 155,000-square-foot research/classroom building on the
Caltech campus.The project proposed demolishing a single-family residence and one apartment complex,as well
as relocate a historic bungalow court.The historical resource relocation was determined to be a less than significant
impact because the resource would be restored according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties:Restoration.
City of San Leandro, 915 Antonio Street and 844 Alvarado Street Project, Cultural Resources Manager.
Authored the cultural resources identification and evaluation study completed in compliance with CEQA.The study
summarized the methods and results of cultural resources identification efforts including a field survey,archival
research,and literature review,as well as evaluation of a warehouse,single-family residence,road segment,railroad
spur segment, and foundation for the California Register and San Leandro City Landmarks or Merit Resources,as
defined in Chapter 4-26, Historic Preservation, of San Leandro's Municipal Code. None of the resources were
recommended eligible;however,one historical resource,as defined by Section 15064.5(a)of CEQA,was identified
adjacent to the project area,and an impacts analysis was provided.The findings of the study were incorporated
into the IS/MND completed for the project.The project proposed redevelopment of a site with a 556,044-square-
foot development containing 687 market-rate rental apartment units and a 550-square-foot cafe.
County of Los Angeles,Bridge Point South Bay II,Cultural Resources Manager.Completed the South Central
Coastal Information Center records search and California Register evaluation of an industrial property near
Torrance,California.The industrial property was recommended ineligible for the California Register due to lack of
association with a historic context and lack of integrity. Additionally,the property was evaluated in accordance
with Section 15064.5(a)(2)-(3)of the CEQA Guidelines using the criteria outlined in Section 5024.1 of the California
Public Resources Code, and determined not to be a historical resource for the purposes of CEQA.The findings of
the records search and evaluation were incorporated into the CEQA environmental document completed for the
project,which proposed demolition of the industrial buildings.
Contra Costa County,1833 Alameda Diablo,Diablo,Cultural Resources Identification and Evaluation Study,
Cultural Resources Manager.Authored the cultural resources identification and evaluation study completed.The
study summarized the methods and results of the cultural resources identification efforts including a field survey,
archival research, literature review, and evaluation of a single-family residence for inclusion in the California
Register,Contra Costa County Historic Resources Inventory,and as a Contra Costa County Historic Landmark.The
2
Agreement No. 5666
BakerMichael
I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L
resource was recommended ineligible for all three due to lack of integrity to its period of significance.The study
was completed to inform the issuance of a demolition permit and the need for further CEQA environmental review.
City of South San Francisco, Community Civic Campus Project, Cultural Resources Manager.Authored the
cultural resources letter report summarizing the methods and results of an intensive-level cultural resources field
survey, records search,and two California Register evaluations.The intent of the field survey,records search,and
California Register evaluations was to determine the presence of any historical resources(archaeological and built
environment) within or adjacent to the project area that may be directly impacted by the project. Based on the
results of this study, the project does not have the potential to impact known cultural resources; however,
sensitivity for encountering prehistoric and historic period archaeological resources is very high. Mitigation
measures included a preconstruction meeting,construction monitoring,construction cessation if archaeological
resources are identified,and adherence to California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5.
City of Pleasant Hill, 490 Golf Club Road Cultural Resources Study and Eligibility Evaluation, Cultural
Resources Manager. Conducted a records search, archival research, field survey, and eligibility evaluation in
support of environmental review of the project under CEQA.Authored the cultural resources study documenting
the methods, results, and eligibility recommendations conducted for the project. The field survey identified and
evaluated one built environment resource for inclusion in the California Register and using criteria outlined in
Pleasant Hill Municipal Code Section 18.45.070. The resource appears ineligible for inclusion in the California
Register and per the criteria outlined in the Municipal Code.The project was determined to not have the potential
to impact known historical resources. Study findings were incorporated into the environmental document
completed for the project.
City of Elk Grove, Big Horn Boulevard and Bilby Road Extension Projects, Cultural Resources Manager.
Managed the completion of the cultural resources identification and evaluation study required for the project's
compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA.Authored the study,delineated the APE,conducted interested parties
consultation,conducted a built environment survey,and evaluated three built environment resources for inclusion
in the National Register,one of which was recommended eligible.The project will affect waters of the United States
and must meet the requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act,and Section 106 of the NHPA.
City of Santa Clarita,Canyon Country Community Center Project,Cultural Resources Manager.Authored the
cultural resources identification and evaluation study summarizing the methods and results of records search,
archival research, Feld survey, Section 106 and AB 52 Native American consultation, and evaluation of one built
environment resource for inclusion in the National Register and the California Register. The project will affect
waters of the United States and must meet the requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section
10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act,as well as Section 106 of the NHPA. No cultural resources were identified within
the APE, and the undertaking was determined to have a finding of no historic properties affected.
Recommendations were provided for mitigating effects to archaeological cultural resources and human remains if
encountered during project-related construction.
3