CC RESOLUTION 5100 RESOLUTION NO. 5100
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL
SEGUNDO ESTABLISHING A PARKING IN-LIEU FEE AND
PROCEDURES FOR PAYMENT OF SUCH FEE
The City Council of the City of EI Segundo does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council does hereby finds and declares that:
A. On July 13, 2017, the City initiated the process to amend the EI Segundo
Municipal Code (ESMC) to create a parking in-lieu fee program for the
Smoky Hollow Specific Plan area. The program intent is to allow the
payment of a fee as an alternative method of meeting the City's parking
requirements for private development and to provide additional shared public
parking on-street and off-street in public parking structures;
B. The proposed parking in-lieu fee program will generate funds to pay for
construction of additional shared public parking spaces on-street or off-street
in parking facilities to meet the parking demand of new private development;
C. A report prepared by KOA Corporation, dated September 20, 2016, studied
the feasibility of providing additional street parking in Smoky Hollow. The
report is attached as Exhibit A, and incorporated into this Resolution by
reference;
D. A further study prepared by KOA Corporation, dated June 12, 2018,
estimated the cost of providing up to 159 additional street parking spaces
and determined that cost to be $27,642.64 per space. The estimated costs
are attached as Exhibit B, and incorporated into this Resolution by reference;
E. The City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.,
"CEQA"), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of
Regulations §§15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's
Environmental Guidelines (City Council Resolution No. 3805, adopted March
16, 1993);
F. The City Council of the City of EI Segundo held a duly noticed public hearing
on August 21 and September 18, 2018, to review and consider the staff
report prepared for the project, receive public testimony, and review all
correspondence received on the project, and,
G. This Resolution, and its findings, are made, in part, based upon the evidence
presented to the City Council at its August 21 and September 18, 2018 public
hearing including, the staff report submitted by the Planning and Building
Safety Department.
SECTION 2: Parking In-lieu Fee Amount. The amount of parking in-lieu fee for the
Parking In-lieu Fee Area established in ESMC Chapter 15-27B is $28,000 per parking
space.
SECTION : Timing of Payment. Except as provided in paragraph C, the property owner
may choose at the owner's discretion between the following two options:
A. Parking in-lieu fee must be paid in full before the City issues a Certificate of
Occupancy or provides formal approval of a project that does not require a
Certificate of Occupancy.
B. Alternatively, a property owner may pay a down payment of at least 50% of the full
amount before the City issues a Certificate of Occupancy or provides formal
approval of a project that does not require a Certificate of Occupancy, provided the
property owner enters into a written repayment agreement with the City to pay the
remaining amount. The remaining balance must be paid over a period of time not
to exceed 10 years from the date the City issues a Final Certificate of Occupancy,
with annual payments of at least $1,400 per parking space. The property owner
must execute and record: (i) a promissory note in favor of the City; (ii) a deed of
trust in favor of the City to secure the promissory note; (iii) a covenant against the
real property; and (iv) any other document required by the City Manager, upon
recommendation by the City Attorney.
C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, when a property owner proposes to pay an in-lieu
fee for more than 50% of the required parking for the property, then the in-lieu fee
amount must be paid in full before the City issues a Certificate of Occupancy or
provides formal approval of a project that does not require a Certificate of
Occupancy.
SECTION 4: Authorization. The City Manager or designee is authorized to take any
actions necessary to effectuate this resolution, including but not limited to, promulgation
of administrative policies and procedures.
SECTION 5: Environmental Assessment. The proposed zone text amendment and
establishment of the in-lieu fee program is exempt from further environmental review under
the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et
seq., "CEQA") and CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et
seq.) because it is for general policies and procedure-making. It does not authorize any
new development entitlements, but simply establishes policies and procedures for allowing
the previously approved project to be constructed. Any proposed project that will utilize
the changes set forth in this Resolution will be subject to CEQA review as part of the
entitlement review of the project. The proposed zone text amendment and fee will not
adversely impact the environment and is therefore exempt from the provisions of CEQA.
SECTION 6: Reliance On Record. Each and every one of the findings and determination
in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and
written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and
determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council
RESOLUTION No. 5100
Page 2 of 3
in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record
as a whole.
SECTION 7: Limitations. The City Council's analysis and evaluation of the project is
based on the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a project
that absolute and perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the project will not exist.
One of the major limitations on analysis of the project is the City Council's lack of
knowledge of future events. In all instances, best efforts have been made to form accurate
assumptions. Somewhat related to this are the limitations on the city's ability to solve what
are in effect regional, state, and national problems and issues. The City must work within
the political framework within which it exists and with the limitations inherent in that
framework.
SECTION 8: Summaries of Information. All summaries of information in the findings,
which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The
absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular
finding is not based in part on that fact.
SECTION 9: This Resolution will remain effective until superseded by a subsequent
resolution.
SECTION 10: This Resolution is the City Council's final decision and will become
effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED RESOLUTION No. 5100 this 181h day of
September, 2018.
Drew gyIes ZZor
ATTEST:
Tracy Weaver LityC�Ierk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark Ienley, C - ttorney
RESOLUTION No, 5100
Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
I, Tracy Weaver, City Clerk of the City of EI Segundo, California, do hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Resolution No. 5100 was duly passed, approved and adopted by said City Council at a
regular meeting held on the 18th day of September, 2018, approved and signed by the
Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, by the following vote:
AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Pirsztuk, Council Member Brann, and Council Member
Pimentel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Mayor Boyles and Council Member Nicol
WITNESS MY HAND THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF SAID CITY this day of October,
2018.
Tr Weaver, City Clerk
of the City of EI Segundo,
California
RESOLUTION NO. Sinn EXHIBIT A
PARKING DESIGN STUDY BY KOA CORPORATION
KOACORPORATION 1100 Corporate Center Dir. Suite 201
PLANNING & ENGINEERING Monterey Park, CA 91754
1: 323-260-4703 f: 323-260-4705
www koacorporation,com
,„IIIAc l,,,,l IN SIICAJII,,, III 011 E1111110,RAIN[DU IIIM
Date: September 20, 2016— DRAFT
To: Genevieve Sharrow— MIG, Inc.
From: Brian A. Marchetti, AICP
Subject Overview of Conceptual Parking Design Efforts— Smoky Hollow Specific Plan, EI Segundo
KOA Project JB41072
This document provides a summary of the conceptual parking design exercises conducted by KOA as part the
overall traffic and parking analysis and design efforts for the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan in the City of EI Segundo.
OveirVii Hw
KOA provided engineering design services to the Specific Plan team, to find feasible methods to add public parking
through potential roadway and on-street parking reconfigurations and through potential new off-street centralized
parking structures.
During the early stages of the conceptual design process, it was determined that the use of one-way traffic flow
on minor north-south roadways (leaving larger collector and arterial roadways to operate with traditional two-
way traffic flow) could be applied with diagonal parking configurations on one side of the street to increase on-
street parking capacity. It was also determined that back-in or reverse parking would be beneficial to the Specific
Plan area, in that it provides drivers exiting parking spaces a better view of bicyclists and vehicles in the roadway.
A reconfiguration of EI Segundo Boulevard was considered, to provide on-street parking along the north curb of
that roadway. This reconfiguration was considered for the overall extents between Standard Street on the west
and Kansas Street on the east.
The total estimated on-street increase in parking supply for north-south roadways was 85 spaces, and for EI
Segundo Boulevard was 101 spaces. In addition, KOA reviewed two potential locations, located at the northeast
and northwest corners of the Maryland Street/Franklin Avenue intersection, to assess potential off-street parking
spaces that could be provided. These locations could support parking structures with 548 spaces and 363 spaces,
respectively.
II” c-,-Si ur7c IEffoirts aind IFiiirOitra; s
On-Street SUDDly Increases— Norah-South Road'wayc
Within the Specific Plan area, conceptual designs were created for north-south roadways to provide both one-
way traffic flow and diagonal back-in on-street parking spaces. Locations of driveways were considered, but with
potential land use changes within the Specific Plan area, it was assumed that approximately 15 percent of the
driveways might be closed due to site redevelopment and reconfigurations of access that focused more on rear-
LOS ANGELES ONTARIO ORANGE SAN DIEGO
Wc .'OA CORPORATION
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
alley access. The one-way flow configuration for a northbound or southbound pattern on each analyzed segment
was optimized based on the best increase in parking supply due to driveway locations on the west curb and the
east curb. A concept for Arena Street was completed, but it was determined that no net increase in parking
would result—this roadway was therefore excluded from the analysis.
Table I provides a summary of the estimated on-street parking capacity increases that could result if such
reconfigurations were implemented within the Specific Plan area. The total estimated parking supply increase is
85 spaces, which is a total supply increase of 26 percent over existing general parallel space configurations.
The conceptual designs for these roadways are provided in Attachment A.
TABLE I — ESTIMATED PARKING SUPPLY INCREASES ON NORTH-SOUTH ROADWAYS,
WITH POTENTIAL RECONFIGURATIONS
Increase in Parking Percentage Increase
city
Parallel Potential Diagonal
Segment Location Parking Capacity Parking Capa
Spaces in Parking
II
Standard Street 22 23 _ 1 5%
Eucalyptus Street 27 36 9 33%
Sheldon Street q 16 20 4 25%
Penn Street 1923 4 21%
Sierra Street �, 18 _ 22 4 22%
Lomita Street 22 24 1 2 9%
Maryland Street 25 31 6 24%
Center St(north) 26 36 10 39%
Center St (south) 17 24 7 41%
Nevada St (north) 23 28 5 22%
Nevada St(south) 21 32 11 52%
Oregon St (north) 20 26 6 30%
Oregon St (south) 26 34 8 31%
California Street ' 28 36 8 29%.
TOTALS 310 395 85 27%
On-Street Supply Increases— EI Segundo (Boulevard,
The four-lane roadway of EI Segundo Boulevard would be restriped within specific extents in the Specific Plan area
under this concept to provide two travel lanes, a center two-way left-turn lane, and a north-curb permitted
parallel parking area. The concept of this reconfiguration was not considered for areas outside of these extents, in
order to not affect intersection capacity at the Main Street/EI Segundo Boulevard intersection and to also not
affect intersection capacity at the Illinois Street/EI Segundo Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard/EI Segundo
Boulevard intersections.
This potential roadway configuration with added permitted parking would add 101 parking spaces to the area
supply.
Overview of Conceptual Parking Design Efforts—Smoky Hollow Specific Plan, EI Segundo Page 2
Prepared for MIG, Inc. JB41072
September 20, 2016—DRAFT
SOA CORPORATION
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
The example conceptual design for one segment of this roadway is provided in Attachment B.
Roadway Network Circulation Pattern
With the potential reconfigurations of the north-south roadways within the Specific Plan area, and the
optimization of the related parking supply increases based on the best configuration at each location, using either
northbound or southbound traffic flow, the one-way traffic flow will not necessarily alternate for each subsequent
roadway.
However, an analysis of the total traffic flow pattern indicated that there would not be a repeat of the same traffic
flow direction for more than two consecutive north-south roadways. Reconfigured roadway designs would need
to be in compliance with one-way and do-not-enter signage requirements.
The one-way roadway flow pattern for these north-south roadways is illustrated on the figure within Attachment
C.
Off-Street SueDly Increases
Two potential parking structure locations were examined by KOA, for potential parking supplies that could be
provided within the potentially available footprints. The parking structure height, used to determine the potential
number of parking levels that could be provided, was assumed not to exceed 35 to 40 feet. Bottom floor height
was considered to be 10 feet, with each upper level at nine feet and a two-foot allowance for slab and equipment
on each level. A four-story structure under these assumptions would potentially be approximately 34 feet in
height, although tops of elevator shafts and lighting standards would be higher. Also with sloped parking levels,
the height could be higher as well at one end of the structure.
The potential parking structure locations were determined by the project team to be potentially located on either
side of Maryland Street, directly north of Franklin Street. For the northeasterly potential site, an oil derrick exists
within the northern portion of the site, and therefore a surface lot with proper spacing from that element was
provided. A parking structure was conceptually designed for the south side of that parcel.
The conceptual design exercise indicated that the northeast site could potentially provide 548 spaces, and the
northwest site could potentially provide 363 spaces. These numbers have not been adjusted for existing private
parking spaces on these parcels that would be provided, likely through covenants, to continue to provide those
off-street supplies within the parking structures.
The northeast site does not appear to have any existing parking. There is an existing oil derrick on the site,
however. A 50-foot buffer is provided around the derrick where no structures would be constructed. Surface
parking would be located within the buffer area. On the northwest site, estimated parking spaces total 130, for a
net gain of 233 spaces with the structure.
The conceptual design for the two potential alternate parking structure locations are provided in Attachment D.
Overview of Conceptual Parking Design Efforts—Smoky Hollow Specific Plan, EI Segundo Page 3
Prepared for MIG, Inc. JB41072
September 20, 2016—DRAFT
K A CORPORATION
PLANNING S ENGINEERING
I
A°F-11 A01HI41ElN r A
CONCEPTUAL PARKING DESIGNS, NORTH-SOUTH ROADWAYS
Overview of Conceptual Parking Design Efforts—Smoky Hollow Specific Plan, EI Segundo Attachments
Prepared for MIG, Inc. JB41072
September 20, 2016—DRAFT
_... ...._.. _..'3nN3nd .........rel IAr�V��
xW' l
W
W
w W
z IL
r^. t
k �w I
W W J
b � I J i i s o`c
pI Q� WillLUc O WN
w I ' > y
w7 II iuu W\
a "W.,.� iiiiiiiiiuui cc pj W
w V a
u r c W a
Y
y� IL
N
N I w
I
Of �I
t �
rv_
N M1 M
LLI '
Uy U iJ
S
MVAinnoe 0ONno3S 13 i= ry
��7 ury
�v
.............. ........ ..............
. . . ...............................
3nN3AV NIlANV,9A
ti
I. J dl j LU
9L
jw
S. cc
it
uj
A
N
CC
4c W 0 LU
> z
ui
11111[ CC Ww
CL
w
Cn
z
o.
14- w I V C9
CL
LLJ
Jlir
-4106
............. ........ u
lvl,
CNVATnoo 0ONn03S 13
aa
E
lu
36N35 .............................
Lu
II -1 Ic
LO Z.
LU
Lu
(a 4) Z
QU Ic
Lu
cc
LU U)
y Odd
LU
Uj
U)
ryry J z
cc
r/Cl— 0
0 em I
9
w
LO Kv
LO ,
p � j I Y
ONVA31noo 0GNn03S 13
...........
�.........................
X91
3nN3Ad � V' ,r'� I NIlNNd21J
ti
`�.
� I
LiLd
LU
( Y O
� F s
J
LU
IL Z-1
ui
CC 0
✓, JJ �. N p Z ad
W
; Z O
W � ;�
cc W W
q V n V ma
Lu ..4
J CO) z
V s
w., a
uW � I a
Z
Z II diH
w
1 d,
d
� I
z
U
UHVA31noo 0aNnJ3s
...................... .......... .............
. . .... _ G . . . .....................
_-- � .
. . ...............
3nN:IAV NIIANVW
to
0
cc
zLLA A
LU
LU
w z cc
LU o
z
U)-
V hl N p > CC
LU LLI
z ~ :.m
m w uj
LU
10 ui
co ( U)
FL
C.4
L'i
UItl SCJ j.
f
a8VA31noe 0(]NnD3S 13
.................... ......... ............
......... .............................
.....................
. .......... .......
................
----- ...........
. ........................
3nN]AV - INMINV8J
lu
CL
Lu
0. oz
L U
II _j SIV
c
CC w
UJ o 001'.
z
> CC
LU lu
CL LU
LU 0
L �L C
I
co) Cc
0
J a
W.
48VA31noe DONnom 13
......... ........
3nN3AV NII)INVHA
II
ol
JVA
LU
Q
vs p IML
bf
cc
Lu
WN0 0
> z Ic
LU LU
LU lu
ui
0 UJ
0 OCL
d II
CD U)
z
Y
co
ZO
121
—7...................
UWUSO
g�
ONVAmnoe OGNn93S -13 Q z
p
........................ ..............
u— - --------- . ..........
' I
enN3ne NIIANV2IA
I �
I
� I I
k
!� I
cc y
Oj
N d 6
' z OW
Q a V ¢w
% o
o coow
co N CP
Z
Nd
cc
Alt
OD ! 444 I I a v
cm
a
CMN
I I
�I
i
_ rx
r }rry
z � -
z a
®avneinoe oaNnoes '13
.............. ........ ......
........... �W........... ...........
.......
3nN3n v _._._.......... ....... ..
q ONV80
V �
4
I
MA W
o�
UJ
IL
Z J
�yw J
uj
Z ¢d
C =o N h Q
a
CL O — H a
I = L W�
LU cc r :pLL,m
C)
p y
Ld
Z
W ° F
...........
II
Z
r �......�......._,._ :_ .n.
r'r
...........
aai o' .
3nN3AV (INV60
SII OC y
ul
IL
KR. 0 U)
Lu
cc
&
zoui
z ,cc
U-1
j
0 .-
LU 0 c
> z I
uj ul
m ~
ul
tu
LLI 0
o cr
j
< z
IL
< 5Z
>
Lu
U ."
10 00,
................ o6.
.. ..........
3nN3AV NII>INVdJ
............ ............................. ...............
...... ............. L.....
.. ........ ....... -- -------- - -- --------------
3nN3AV Nll>]NVdA
LO
LU
U)
IL
U)
z
-119
LO a-C
Z IL
a Lu
z
cc
Z as
> z (,Go
w lu to
LU
ui CJ
0 'W.
0, LU
Z
GdVA31noe 0(]NnD3S 13
----------
. . . .............................. .................... .....
. ............ . . ......
CINV80
JFINJAV
III U
F--
Ld
Li
F-
W
.j
p I
Qq
0
al
he
Z
JG
LO
................
J...............
CL
LU LU cc
w -,c Z cc-C
,
IC 15 LL
Z
UJ
fL LU 0 ui 41C
0
LL, :,.LLI
0 0 IL
co)
z
_j
II °�� V H
..........
V H
i 6.
d
...........
(18VATMOB NMINV8J
...............................
3nN3AV NIIHN"J
I tl
iq
w
IIIA O
N
cp
IL`
��'� I �✓�" SII ! r� J
® MM W
, III SSI"`•.,� ® y ,\, ' W S
u, 0 O y N
J� 1 LU � W
cc ul
I I ~= o f V
W - y my
z
0 1 v J e
ti vELQ a
a
W
m
0
ap � e I
I�
—......_.................. ..........
SH
CHVA31noo 0aNno3s I3
............................... _.
...............
..............................
........ . .....................
3nN3AV (INV80
Ld
j
0
LID z
IM LLI
II
uj LU
'J
Z
zo U)CM
W.
LU
V.
Wo
LU ca
4 � � ^.,..w�ww�w � � a
a ii
rt
... ............. . .... ........... .
3nN3AV NII>INVW
...........
PPKOA CORPORATION
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
CONCEPTUAL PARKING DESIGN, EL SEGUNDO BLVD. EXAMPLE
Overview of Conceptual Parking Design Efforts—Smoky Hollow Specific Plan, EI Segundo Page 5
Prepared for MIG, Inc. JB41072
September 20, 2016—DRAFT
� § \
s~ � jmee
\ . I
~ � ( Lis
. \
§■2
; - .4-
§■IL_ w
■
) �) • �� -
, � � . .
. ,
j ¥agN
� ®
% \2
ƒ
0 z §»g
j \l
�\ \'
ME!
KO.A CORPORATION
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
X°r°°rA,CII 1 II11 II11::N"Ill C ,.
ONE-WAY ROADWAY FLOW PATTERN
Overview of Conceptual Parking Design Efforts—Smoky Hollow Specific Plan, EI Segundo Page 6
Prepared for MIG, Inc. JB41072
September 20, 2016—DRAFT
ame Ya3mnas
V
LS tlNYIONI
Iv I
i I
I
IID ISsVONllt is,SION11111
I
1S N019NIHSYNI If
o w
W I III
IS WINHOJI'M) L's'VINio�' 0ti
1S N093HO �' LS New 93eCtl ,�'
13Ywtl"
��f� �
15 tlOYA3N A.lYA Y
a'c.l�' a
e0 MOIY9NOB
W
I
0
is ativ1AHY I11'
LS WLIWOI
aw
n,Yq�l�;,' I W,
.IIIIII, i '
III'
IS NN3d IS NN3d
VIII
,wr„rv^
IS N0013HS IS NOG13HS
IA
• A
I N
LS YN3YtlLs rN3rY"' III O N
CID o
I
cm c.
a a
z u
w c.vl
NO SnLdAWDA3 6 _ u
6
rll, � 10a
CL CL In LAtA
c
11. 3 3 a
C hr, < %� o o O
L W IS aklr Nm P O O
_ _T = C
an00�
Y N
„',,1 it E E `
w � LMa
� �I�II,"+, a Nlrw IL.............
CD
V IA
PPKOA CORPORATION
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
CONCEPTUAL PARKING DESIGNS, PARKING STRUCTURES
Overview of Conceptual Parking Design Efforts—Smoky Hollow Specific Plan, EI Segundo Page 7
Prepared for MIG, Inc. JB41072
September 20, 2016—DRAFT
IMF— Hr,
—------ lj�
s r
...............
............
IS®NV- 8VN
............. ..............
o CC
u..
....................
............
LU
>
IL
ui 4c
O-J
. .... w 1111, I ZZ
.
W
31� cc
__J I=
..........
LL
nO
OZcc
uj
Z 0
J-1—LU2
jLUJ—U:=U=u.................
N
is GNV-"Vn "i cc I-.
4 co
LU
cc
............... T-.TNTT 0
1, �T�T�T� . T
............
..........
.............
--M,...........Ii ........................
..........
..............
..............
vE, Io
T
u 0
r- J�u Fm
......................
.............
iS(INV-Lk8VVI
.............. ............
I P'NIp
-------- --
ILL
T5-F Fri. Ml ix
................
.....................I
z
0
Z
as
TFiMT-Fn-�-�-
U,
>
IT! n
................ UJ 44
.............
z
............ z—
0
Z
LU 4C
cc m
7—Fill-17: .04
-Ea M LL
U.
UJ
CO Z
UJ=LL1—u—L UIJJJJJ=�lu
.......... ............ .............
iS ON11 IMIM Z
. .............
..... ..........
TH
TFF -1 1=rll
..........
I JIU—
............
c,s
z 4{, C)62 a.k,�
RESOLUTION NO. 5100 EXHIBIT B
ON-STREET PARKING CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES BY KOA CORPORATION
El Segundo Smoky Hollow-On-Street Parking Improvement Costs Breakdown by Scenario KOA
DISTRICT WIDE STRIPED PARKING
-ENT
4A 871,44000'S 166,50000
5 258,500 00 1 S 304,500 00 1349,00000 1 S 1,080,50000iS 1.951,94000
Costs per Space: S 12,27635
Number of Spaces: 159
PER ROADWAY-STRIPED PARKING WITH STREET IMPROVEMENTS
n� -- --I
_SEGMENT
S 151,00000 S �ODIDD'S...............21,5000D 5 25,50000 S 29,0E02Om ___Z9,50000 S 230,50000
105,00000 S 6,5 : 26,10111 S 31,10000
128,00000 S 5,00000 S 23r000.�2 7,00000 $ 31,00000
00000 S 214,00000 'S 5 S
4 S 1n,000 00 S 5,50000 S 22,50000 S 26,50000 S 30,50000 S 8500000 S 29DO DO 35,00000
131,00000 5 4,50000 S 24,000 00 00000 $ 32,00000 S F8,500 DO S
5 5 2�9 5DO ODJ 5 S 43,9000
6 S 160,00000 5............. 5,10000 S 23,11101 S 27,8SOD66 S 31,50000 S pq,000 DO S-'7Z9-666765 11 S 107,000 22,545450
7 1 121roDO 00 S 5�00 00 S 23,00000 S 27,010 00 S 11,00D DO S 36,000 00 1 2D7,0.0 Do S 34,50000
8 S 124,00000 6,00000 S 2]l,S.O 00 S 2 7 50OLO ..........3152000
,",1��222R , F8,50000 S 212,50000ITmm 6 S 26,56250
266 5156250
�00
1 124,00000 22.50000 1 26,10100
30,000 I S 83,50000 S 07,500
I S 135,000 00 S 3 50DOO S 1S,00D 00 S 22,SOD 00 S 25,50000 5 70,50D 00 5 205.50000 4 S 51,37500
11 I' DO
S 132,00000 S 3,500 O"li""S...................23,1�00 00 : 27,00000 S 31,00000 S 84,50000 S 216,50000 4 S_._.54
........ 2 777,00D 00 $ 226,0DO 00 7 S 32,28571 i2 13 iS71
12 5 139,00000 S 1,10111 2_�22.22 L1,01O 00 S 32,DDO 00
13 1........L16,000 00 S 6,50000 5 23,500 OD ..............E500 00 5 31,50000 S 89,06FORS_ 10 S 20,70000
14 1�2!22?DO $ 6,00000 S 24,000 OD. 28,50000 S 32,50000 S 21,RDROO 9 S 26,66667
15 _1..................P9,000 00 S 9,50000 S 295R�6 S............34,50000 S 39,SOOOO S 113,000,66, 1 S 252,00000
16 S 8,50D 00 S 9,50000 5 YISDDOO S 13,00000 S 42,506TEl S 76,94000 i��Po
3 S 25 64667
17 S 37,800 Dj'S 9,50000
'SOOOO S 11,00000 S H'63570 S 14.S000O S 48,00000 tT-65,60000 011 6 S 14,30000
1131,80000 $ 95 13,036 S 14,50000 S 48,00000 6 S 14,30000
0000 s 11,00000 5
19 S 35,56000 8,50000 S 9,50000IS 11,50000 S 13,00000 S 42510 00 S 7 '660�0'� S 26,02000
20 S 37,80000 S 9,50000 S 11,00000IS 13,00000 S 14,50000 5 46,00000 S 1 14,11100
36,11122. ...................�.,222 22 1 10,5'000 S 12rOD 00 S .. ,00000 5 4S,SODOO S 82,1E22 �6 Sa- 3�6.16 67
OOD
22 S 34,44600 S 7,S000O S 9,000 OOIS 10,90000 $ L00000S 2"
5 39,COD 00 73,44000
23 S 36,68000 9,00000 S 10,50D 00IS 12,00000 S 14 022..00 S 45,500 00 82,18000 6 S 13,696 67
S ............F S 11,03333
24 l S 32,20000 S 6,50000 S 8,00000 S 9,00000 S 10,50000 S 34,00000 66,20000
25 S 32,20000 $ 6,50000 S 8,00000 S 9,00000 S 10,50000 S34,00000 S 66,20000 0 6 S 11,03333
S 3 ................ _,7
26 S 33,32000 S 7,000 8,500 DO $ 10,00000 S 11,50000 7,00000 S 70,32000 r," T H
� 6 2000
27............ S 36,68000 S 9,000 00 10,500 00 S 12,00000 S 14,00 P 00 S 45 5 D D 0 0 S 82 �!L
"'0 `...........
28
.................................
S 37,800 OD S 8500 0"�,"A.................... 11,10D 00 S 13,00000, �3��RROO I ID".DO , 16,06000
29 S 42,280 DO 5 10,00000 S 11500 00 S 13,50000 S 15,50000 5 56,500,66 S 92,78000 1 6 S 15,46333
1 4,395,180 00
Costs per Space: S 27,64264
Number of Spaces: 159
PER ROADWAY STRIPED PARKING ONLY
SEGMENT
1S 64,280 00 S 9,000005 14500,0017,20000 S 19,50000 5 60,00000 S 124,28000 0 N/A4,
............................."I'll-111,11,...............
2 S 57,56000 S 9,500 Do S 15,00000 17,50000 S 20,00000 S 62,00220, s 119,56000 8 S 194500
3 S 62,04000 S 10'DOD 00 S 15,500 00�18,500 00 5 21,00000 S 65,00000 5 127,04000 2 S 63,52000
4 1 S 1 D,500 00 S 16,50000 rS 19500 00 S 22,00000 5 68,50D 00 S 132,78000 11 6 5 22,130 OD
S 66,52000 S 10 50000 S 17,0000015 20,00000 S 23,00000 S 70,50000 S 137,02000 S S 27,404 DO
6 S6540000 S 10,00000 S 16,50000 jT1950000 S 22,50000 S 66,50000 S 133,90000 V 11 S 12,17273
S 6D,920 00 S 10,00000 S 15,500001 S 78,500 00 S 21,00000 S 65,00000 $ 125,9ZE 6 S 20,96667
8 S 71,00000 lr 00 S 16,50000 1-9.500 TO "i 22,50D 00 S 68,50000 $ 139,50000 8 S 17A3750
9 S 62,040 O�, $ 9,1000, 1 11,01,00 S .,.,.,.,.,.,5-0,0.......,
-0,0-2 S "'_2000DOO S 62,00000 4 $ 31,01000
10 S 63,16000 $ 6,10000 S 12,CDO 00 S 1400000 1 16,50000 S 49,00000 S 11-216070 4 S 28,04000
11 S 6540000 'S 11,00000 : 16,50000 S 19 500667 13.50000 5 60,50000 $ 125.900,00 4 S 31,47500
12 S 64,28000 S 10,00000 16,00000 S 19,000(OF 21,500 OD $ 66.50D 00 $ 130,780 66 7 $ 18.682 86
13 S 58,68000 fS...........11,00000 S 17,00D 00-S20,0000 0" S 22,500 OD $ 70,SDOOO S 129,18D 00 .......10 S 12,91800
2 "6 S 14,72356
62,51200 1E560 00 S 17,00000 S 20,00000 IS 22,50'00 S 70,00000 S 132512 00
15 -1$ 62,04000 .............Y6,�6'0 00 S 15,50000 S 18,00000_" i............51 0 64,50000 _S 126,540 DO. ..............i S 126,54000
DO
21 S 34,44000 8,SOOOO S 9,500 DO 11,50070 S 13,00000 S 42,5000jS76,9467D 3 S 25,64667
17 I S 37,80000 5 9,500 DO 5 11,00000 S 13,00000 S 14,50000 5 48,00000 IS 85,80000 6 S 14,30000
1819
T-6, 480000 S 85,80000 S 14,300
5 37,80000 �"�006"S 11,00000 S 11,500
, 14,50 00 S DO
19 1 1 35,56000 $ 8,50000 S 9,50000 S 11,50000 $ 13,00000 S 4250000 S 78,06000 1 26.20 H..
S 37,8000D S 9,50000 S 11,00000 S 13,00000 S 14,500 OD' S 48,00000 S 85,80000 11 ..........F 'S 14,300 DO
...................
21 s 36,68000 S 9,00000 S 10,50000 S 12,00000 S 1400000 .......... 4 5,500 Ob S 82,18000 6 5 6�
L6 L71
'1 244 000
12 S 34,44000 i�........5536 66 "i... ........6,ODD 00 5 10,50000 5 12 000 00 S 39.00000 5 73,44066 ........9- S 13,696 67
23mmm S 36,660 00 S 9,00000 S 10,50000 S 12,00000 L 1400000 S 45.500 OD $ 82,18000
24 S 3 2,20000 $ 6,50000 S 6,00000 S 9,000 00 A 10,50000'S 34.00000 S 66,200 00 6 5 11,033 33
33
25 $ 32,200 DO S 6,50D00 S 8,00000 S 9,00000 S .10,50000 S 34,00000 S 66,20000 ............... 7-1,7
26 S 33,32000 J_5_7,000 OFT 8,500 OD S 10,00000 S TT500 OO'T 37rOOO 00 S 70,32000 2000
..........................
13,69667
27 5 �6 iV S 9,00C 00 � 10,50000 S ,),',I x, 6
G D S 45,500 OD S 12,L�222,
................
213 $ 37,80000 1'�.........W,�70,36' S 9,50000 S L1,512.2� 06" S 42,50000 S 80,30000 5 S 16,06000
13,00F .............
............_25.......... S 42,28000 i_iE,'6j'T0F'1 11,50000 S 13,5000015,5000 50,50000 S 92,78000 6 S 15,463
159
Costs per Space: S 19,05215
Number of Spaces: 159
J\2017\JB71264 ElSeg Smoky Hollow PkgCosts StudyNDocs\ElSeg PerSpace Costs v2
Main 6/12/2018