CONTRACT 4290 CLOSED Agreement NA 2 `' 0
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND
RBF CONSULTING
This AGREEMENT is entered into this 6th day of February, 2012, by and between the
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a general law city and municipal corporation ("CITY") and RBF
Consulting, a California Corporation ("CONSULTANT").
1. CONSIDERATION.
A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the
SCOPE OF SERVICES,below;
B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the
terms and conditions contained...in this....A.greement
C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a sum not to
exceed one hundred fifty four thousand, five hundred and eighty seven dollars
($154,5$7) for CONSULTANT's services. CITY may modify this amount as set
forth below. Unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this
Agreement, CITY will pay this sum as specified in the attached Exhibit "A",
which is incorporated by reference.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
A. CONSULTANT will perform services listed in the attached Exhibit`B," which is
incorporated herein.
B. CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical,
administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials,
equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space and facilities, and all
tests, testing and analyses, calculation, and all other means whatsoever, except as
herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, necessary or proper
to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required
of CONSULTANT by this Agreement.
3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement,
CONSULTANT must submit a detailed invoice to CITY which lists the hours worked and
hourly rates for each personnel category and reimbursable costs (all as set forth in Exhibit "A")
the tasks performed, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period, the
cumulative percentage completed for each task, the total cost of that work during the preceding
billing month and a cumulative cash flow curve showing projected and actual expenditures
versus time to date.
Page I of 1 l
4. POLITICAL REFORM ACT. CONSULTANT agrees that it will be considered a public
official subject to the Political Reform Act of 1974 for purposes of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT agrees and warrants that it has no financial interests which may be materially
affected by the project for which the Initial Study, as specified in the SERVICES, is being
prepared. Such financial interests may include, without limitation, interests in business entities,
real property, or sources of income exceeding $500 received within the past year.
CONSULTANT further warrants that, before executing this Agreement, it reviewed the Political
Reform Act of 1974 and the Fair Political Practices Commission regulations, including, without
limitation, Chapter 7 of Title 2 of the California Administrative Code, Section 18700, et seq., in
order to determine whether any conflict of interest would require CONSULTANT to refrain
from performing the SERVICES or in any way attempting to use its official position to influence
the governmental decisions underlying the subject environmental clearances.
5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK,
A. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT
has
i. Thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be
performed;
ii.. Carefully considered how the services should be performed; and
iii.. Understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending
performance of the services under this Agreement.
B. If services involve work upon any site, CONSULTANT represents that
CONSULTANT has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted
with the conditions there existing, before commencing the services hereunder.
Should CONSULTANT discover any latent or unknown conditions that may
materially affect the performance of the services, CONSULTANT will
immediately inform CITY of such fact and will not proceed except at
CONSULTANT's own risk until written instructions are received from CITY.
C. Although CITY has a duty to the public to independently review any
environmental document, including, without limitation a negative declaration or
draft EIR, prepared by CONSULTANT, that duty to the public, or the breach
thereof, will not relieve CONSULTANT of its duties under this Section or any
representation provided by CONSULTANT in this Agreement.
6. KEY PERSONNEL.
A. CONSULTANT's key personnel assigned to perform work under this Agreement
and their level of responsibility are as follows:
Page 2 of 11
C
Glenn Lajoie,AICP, Project Manager
Collette Morse,AICP CEQA Advisor
Rita Garcia Coordinator/Senior Analyst/Land Use
Eddie Torres, INCE, REA Air Quality/Climate Change/Noise
Achilles Malisos Air Quality/Climate Change
Kristen Bogue, REA Hazardous Materials
Bob Matson Traffic/Transportation
Paul Martin,PE, PTOE Traffic/Transportation
B. The resume of each of the individuals identified in this Section are attached to this
Agreement in Exhibit"C," and incorporated by reference.
C. In the event CITY objects to the continued involvement with this Agreement by
any of the persons listed in this Section, CONSULTANT agrees that it will
replace such persons with individuals that are agreed to by CITY.
7. TERM. The term of this Agreement will be from February 6, 2012 to May 31, 2013. Unless
otherwise determined by written amendment between the parties, this Agreement will terminate
in the following instances:
A. Completion of the work specified in Exhibit`B";
B. Termination as stated in Section 15.
8. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. CONSULTANT will not perform any work under this
Agreement until:
A. CONSULTANT furnishes proof of insurance as required by this Agreement; and
B. CITY gives CONSULTANT a written Notice to Proceed.
C. Should CONSULTANT begin work on any phase in advance of receiving written
authorization to proceed, any such professional services are at CONSULTANT's
own risk.
9. TIME EXTENSIONS. Should CONSULTANT be delayed by causes beyond
CONSULTANT's control, CITY may grant a time extension for the completion of the contracted
services. If delay occurs, CONSULTANT must notify CITY within forty-eight hours (48 hours),
in writing, of the cause and the extent of the delay and how such delay interferes with the
Agreement's schedule. CITY may, but is not required to, extend the completion time, when
appropriate, for the completion of the contracted services.
10. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this
Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the
contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing,
Page 3 of l 1
2
executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in
the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties.
11. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a
Taxpayer Identification Number.
12. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT, at its sole expense, will obtain and
maintain during the term of this Agreement, all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that
may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement.
13.PROJECT COORDINATION AND SUPERVISION.
A. Glenn Lajoie will be assigned as Project Manager and will be responsible for job
performance, negotiations, contractual matters, and coordination with CITY's
Project Manager.
B. Kimberly Christensen will be assigned as CITY's Project Manager and will be
personally in charge of--and pr,,6u sally— performrthertechnicad
execution of the Project on a day-to-day basis on behalf of CITY and will
maintain direct communication with CONSULTANT's Project Manager.
14. WAIVER. CITY's review or acceptance of, or payment for, work product prepared by
CONSULTANT under this Agreement will not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights
CITY may have under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising from CONSULTANT's
performance. A waiver by CITY of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained in
this Agreement will not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any
other term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement, whether of the same or different
character.
15. TERMINATION.
A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time
with or without cause. Notice of termination will be in writing.
B. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement at any time with CITY's mutual
consent. Notice will be in writing at least thirty (30) days before the effective
termination date.
C. Should termination occur, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT
will, at CITY's option, become CITY's property, and CONSULTANT will
receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up
to the effective date of notice of termination, not to exceed the total costs under
Section 1(C).
D. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure
Page 4 of 11
on its own terms services similar to those terminated.
E. By executing this document, CONSULTANT waives any and all claims for
damages that might otherwise arise from CITY's termination under this Section.
16. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, models,
photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement are CITY's
property. CONSULTANT may retain copies of said documents and materials as desired, but
will deliver all original materials to CITY upon CITY's written notice. CITY agrees that use of
CONSULTANT's completed work product, for purposes other than identified in this Agreement,
or use of incomplete work product, is at CITY's own risk.
17. PUBLICATION OF DOCUMENTS. Except as necessary for performance of service
under this Agreement, no copies, sketches, or graphs of materials, including graphic art work,
prepared pursuant to this Agreement, will be released by CONSULTANT to any other person or
city without CITY's prior written approval. All press releases, including graphic display
information to be published in newspapers or magazines, will be approved and distributed solely
by C,i'LY;unles&-rrth-erwi.,c ViL L,vidcd-by written-agreement between-th-e-pardes.
18. INDEMNIFICATION.
A. CONSULTANT agrees to the following:
i. Indemnification for Professional Services. CONSULTANT will save
harmless and indemnify, and at CITY's request reimburse defense
costs for CITY and all its officers, volunteers, employees and
representatives (including reasonable attorney's fees), from and
against any and all suits, actions, or claims, of any character
whatever, brought for, or on account of, any injuries or damages
sustained by any person or property resulting or arising from any
negligent or wrongful act, error or omission by CONSULTANT or
any of CONSULTANT's officers, agents, employees, or
representatives,in the performance of this Agreement,except for such
loss or damage arising from CITY's sole negligence, active negligence
or willful misconduct.
ii. Indemnification for other Damages. CONSULTANT indemnifies and
holds CITY harmless from and against any claim, action, damages,
costs (including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees),
injuries, or liability, to the extent resulting from CONSULTANT's
negligence or other wrongful conduct, arising out of this Agreement,
or its performance, except for such loss or damage arising from
CITY's sole negligence, active negligence or willful misconduct.
Should CITY be named in any suit, or should any claim be brought
against it by suit or otherwise, whether the same be groundless or not,
arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, CONSULTANT
Page 5 of 11
9 w %1 ,.
r.
will defend CITY (at CITY's request and with counsel satisfactory to
CITY) and will indemnify CITY for any judgment rendered against it
or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise.
iii. Exclusion for CEQA Actions. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
CONSULTANT need not indemnify, defend, or hold CITY harmless in
CEQA actions initiated pursuant to Public Resources Code §§ 21167 and
21168 where CONSULTANT's work may form the basis of a lawsuit.
However, should CONSULTANT's work, as contemplated by this
Agreement, contain errors or omissions that results in an adverse ruling
against CITY, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify and hold CITY
harmless to the extent provided for in Section 18(A)(i).
B. For purposes of this section "CITY" includes CITY's officers, officials and
employees,
C. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions will survive
termination-ofthivAgreem-ent.
D. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be
maintained by CONSULTANT as required by Section 22, and any approval of
said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or
qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT
pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions
concerning indemnification.
19. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT's professional services.
CONSULTANT's attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY's
written approval are prohibited and will be null and void.
20. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that
CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the
manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to
be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an
agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance,
bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that
may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work
or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the
direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only.
21. AUDIT OF RECORDS.
A. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain,
and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant
information requested and will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises,
Page 6 of 11
4 2 9
® J
upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of
interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records,
accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation
for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT
further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following
final payment under this Agreement.
B. Upon inspection, CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective
measures required by CITY regarding the requirements of this Section.
CONSULTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time to implement said
corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective
measures will result in immediate termination of this Agreement.
C. CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining
to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement.
22. INSURANCE.
A. Before commencing performance under this Agreement, and at all other times this
Agreement is effective, CONSULTANT must procure and maintain the following
types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum, with the limits
set forth below:
Tvve of Insurance Limits (combined sinele)
Commercial general liability: $1,000,000
Professional Liability $1,000,000
Business automobile liability $1,000,000
Workers compensation Statutory requirement.
B. Commercial general liability insurance will meet or exceed the requirements of
ISO-CGL Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. The amount of insurance set forth
above will be a combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury, and property damage for the policy coverage. Commercial General
Liability policy will be endorsed to name City, its officials, and employees as
"additional insureds" under said insurance coverage and to state that such
insurance will be deemed "primary" such that any other insurance that may be
carried by City will be excess thereto. Such endorsement must be reflected on
ISO Form No. CG 20 10 1185 or 88. Such insurance will be on an"occurrence,"
not a "claims made," basis and will not be cancelable or subject to reduction
except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City.
C. Automobile coverage will be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA
00 0106 92, including symbol 1 (Any Auto).
D. Professional liability coverage will be on an "occurrence basis" if such coverage
Page 7 of 1 l
14
ft ,, m
is available, or on a "claims made" basis if not available. When coverage is
provided on a"claims made basis," CONSULTANT will continue to maintain the
insurance in effect for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or
is terminated ("extended insurance"). Such extended insurance will have the same
coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this
Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by City arising
out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or
agents during the time this Agreement was in effect.
E. CONSULTANT will furnish to City duly authenticated Certificates of Insurance
evidencing maintenance of the insurance required under this Agreement,
endorsements as required herein, and such other evidence of insurance or copies
of policies as may be reasonably required by City from time to time. Insurance
must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best Company Rating
equivalent to at least a Rating of"A:VII."
F. Should CONSULTANT, for any reason, fail to obtain and maintain the insurance
-- -----Tequired-bythisAgreement,City may-obtain such coverage at-CONSULTANT's
expense and deduct the cost of such insurance from payments due to
CONSULTANT under this Agreement or terminate.
23. USE OF CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY's prior written approval to
use any consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must
approve of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation.
24. INCIDENTAL TASKS. CONSULTANT will meet with CITY monthly to provide the
status on the project, which will include a schedule update and a short narrative description of
progress during the past month for each major task, a description of the work remaining and a
description of the work to be done before the next schedule update.
25.NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made
when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows:
CITY CONSULTANT
Kimberly Christensen, AICP, Planning Glenn Lajoie
Manager Vice-President
City of EI Segundo PIanning&Bldg Dept RBF Consulting, Inc.
350 Main Street 14725 Alton Pkwy, Irvine, CA
EI Segundo, CA 90245-3813 92618-2027
Fax: (310)322-4167 Fax: (949) 837-4122
Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by
the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly
addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of
actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are
to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph.
Page 8ofII
my a 0
26. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor
retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, to solicit or
secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed
to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting
from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this
warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability.
27. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is
generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any
other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT's or
CITY's obligations under this Agreement.
28. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this
agreement will be in Los Angeles County or in the Federal District Court in the District of
Califomia in-which-Los Angetes County is located.
29. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire
understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements
expressed or implied, oral or written. There are three (3) Attachments to this Agreement. This
Agreement will bind and inure to the benefit of the parties to this Agreement and any subsequent
successors and assigns.
30. CONSISTENCY. In interpreting this Agreement and resolving any ambiguities, the main
body of this Agreement takes precedence over the attached Exhibits; this Agreement supersedes
any conflicting provisions. Any inconsistency between the Exhibits will be resolved in the order
in which the Exhibits appear below:
A. Exhibit A: Budget;
B. Exhibit B: Proposal for Services/Scope of Work; and
C. Exhibit C: Resumes.
31. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review
this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a
whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against
either Party.
32. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed modified to the
extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and, as so
modified, such portion and the balance of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect.
Page 9 of 11
33. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary
action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to
engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment.
CITY's city manager, or designee,may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY.
34. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Agreement,
agreements ancillary to this Agreement, and related documents to be entered into in connection
with this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by
facsimile transmission. Such facsimile signature will be treated in all respects as having the
same effect as an original signature.
35. COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS. The parties agree that all of the provisions hereof
will be construed as both covenants and conditions, the same as if the words importing such
covenants and conditions had been used in each separate paragraph.
36. CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs of this Agreement are for convenience of
reference only and will not affect the interpretation of this Agreement.
37. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be prevented due to fire, flood,
explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or
other similar causes beyond the Parties' control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate
without obligation of either party to the other.
38. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be
provided.
39. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT
represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity
to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its
financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability,
personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in
dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the
proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to
satisfy a public agency.
[Signatures on next page]
Page 10 of 11
4290
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year
first hereinabove written.
CITY OF FL SEGUNDO
ItBF Consulting
Gr4egi,celit
Inierid� City MLnager Ilenn LaJoie
Vice President,Planning and Enviroarnental
Services
ATTEST:
rpi'� Wea'�:P,
CI Clerk Michael J.Burke,
Executive Vice President
Taxpayer ID No. 95-2247293
APPROVED A, 0
MARK D. L, "ityA1, I-trey
By:
Ka H. rger, Assisl,' rit City Attorney
NPlanning&Building SafetyW Planning-OlMonsultant Ping Services\Environmental Consultants\RBF\ln and
OutTrofessional Services Agreement Environmental Review RBF In-N-Out Burgers Project.doc
Page 11 of 11
Exhibit
Budget
429
-J 0
City of El Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
IX. BUDGET
CIA
,TASK 230 220 1 801 155 1 2r'[P 210 186 80 Hours Consultaritts 1F COSA
PRC3JECT 6 COPtOGINVE04NWAL ANALYSIS
..........
Rown,
�.........................................
.............14 ..........-.9
-----------3
z 5-, are 32 t,�
tl 3 2118
SUBTOTAL 5 1 4i,5 Wfi 12 N�,5;16 0�1 i�id!
S4 d4`
TOTAL LABOR COSTS
....-PREPARATIONOF wnMr�KNC�WFF@ WT A
17, IW0,,A5'JFG01w'0P YfE
aaur
........... JJAAta
..
w
2 0 20 1`14 6141
-Ad,aw
11"10,
V �'SJ4, S2�M
.........
540A75
................ t7 ffifw.
F ... .............. _A3 47(1
!RWIRONAWNTAL IMPACT RCPORI S
A
_J: zaLr
-f I—11M tFk I
2 130
5131,200
SUSTOTAL k ASOR S
S�P,tLyR PROJECT COORMATIONANO MV57JINGS
4n
S UM TOTAL LAB OR C CST S
5j,200
TO LHOURS 6 40 42
�14 33 M
t,540 :546 IM 3 3 Wi SO $3 2r4
,�7
JI
SUBTOTAL LABOR COSTS
(TOTAL LABOR COSTS
4.0TN(G@TI0.SI 98-C65A NCCCAW�JWCE OPTION 2�
iTIVF UECGNArR5i
I a Fa RpCrrr „ .,�, ., � 7 a .qp ry m 0d .� .... ... ., .,�,. ..°�C#r@SU'rl�
..................
_5
M,315
C00"OONA,T410N,ANO TINOS
SUBTOTAL LABOR COSTS
On 'k,
.... ......
ie Al
!qj-1 - �t . 11
.............
$17,650
0,0 u. MNOOLLWgRAULtS i o
j ?,ZOO 52 300
SUIST-011AL LASOR COSTS i _L--,--
I oTAL tiouRs 4W AN z8 199 96 28 0 12 2?baJ
R1—5
P�YFRM �l
CONTINGENCY(10%) 54 Mp,
('TOTAL LABOR e0SfS at s I
jToW 8m100 for Project Amatyt%Is Ilark 1,0) 1 t„06,622 t.i I ,,W i L ipl . 11"111�
IL"
ITetal Oulnot tot C60A CIearm000 OlMoo M.EIR flo*WIA shtaugh 0.0) $149,747 I' k.".T' Fnd*Twi,oNx Vjh,i 1:,c.jN lkN,11-j4v
[R i, H.Wj Gxcla GA 0::wN,k,A01r,U
ITaL&I Modgat forCEQA Cloarance Option 2,,MAID(Tabk%1.0.7'.0,3,0,9,0 and 10,0)
7dR!1
=
AL2 L,LT-w ulLk�Wm YA 54E-oo
.... .........
91,Mehl' -—--------------
Faa! ten
LOILC Ql!—Sudqol eto0down
45
------------ .................
I I Pon, u0 r,m rA au 11, jr
V, 1,
..................... )ZM
Ml
Y'Nixcou a Z'w
/42 0
City of El Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-6 O North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
This page intentionally left blank.
4
EXHtBI'T ' .B
CURRENT TIME AND MATERIALS RATES
............��ity Staff
u
Horly Ra t e
Director ofillanning and Building Safety 91.22-.-
Planning Manager 8928
Principal Planner 84.55
ikssistant Planner 47.89
()ffice specialist If 33.51 ..............
Assistant City Attorney ......... 265.00, ....................
Note: Rstes are sllbjcn to chnnge. Next schedtiled nue updalc is Octobcj- 1,2012.
Wkinning& P Ploonme"-Old"CollsOant Phig
Agreemcm In-NI-Out BUrgCrS,(l0C
ce—`,
Exhibit B
Proposal for Services
Scope of Work
I�II�
UPDATED PROPOSAL
FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
600-630 North Sepulveda
Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
Environmental Compliance
Documentation
9 I�
N�
02,11 VI'u" ,WI I'
� I
Prepared for:
City of EI Segundo
Submitted by:
RBF Consulting
January 30, 2012
A"N
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction and Understanding of the Project......................................................................................1
1.1 Introduction........„.,......„..,...„........„................„...........,..................,..................,......,..........,.„....,...1
1.2 Statement of RBF's Commitment to the City.....,....,,>„,........... 1
1.3 Understanding of the Project..................„,.....,....„........,....,.....,...............,........,,......,.......,.....,,,2
II. Scope of Work.....................................................................................*""..............................................5
-1.0 Project Scoping/Technical Analysis..., ...................... ..........,.,.....................5
1.1 Project Kick-Off and Project Characteristics..........,................ .....___.........-_".... 5
1.2 Research and Investigation.........................................................................................5
1.3 Technical Studies„...........................................................................................,,...,,......5
1.4 Preparation of the Initial Study.... ................„...„...,..„..,..„.....,,.„„....,...,...........8
1.5 Initial Study Findings and Meeting with City Staff-............................
2.0 CEQA Option 1: Preparation of Administrative Draft EIR.......„................................................9
2.1 Notice of Preparation............................................................... .,....,..9
2.2 Introduction and Purpose............................................................................................10
2.3 Executive Summary.................................................„................,........,......,...............10
2.4 Thresholds of Significance........................................................................................10
2.5 Project Description.......____...........-..........................,..........,.....,.,. ..........,........,.10
2.6 Cumulative Projects/Analysis -..... ..................................... 10
2.7 Environmental Analysis................. ..................,.,........,........,.............................11
2.8 Alternatives to the Proposed Action..................................__...... ......................11
2.9 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program..........................................................11
2.10 Additional Sections-,......... . .............,.........12
2.11 Graphic Exhibits..........................„.,............ ...............,.....,.,...,12
3.0 Draft EIR............................................ ..........................12
3.1 Preliminary Draft EIR...........................„..,......,...........,.........,..........,.........................12
3.2 Completion of the Draft EIR,...,,,...__....... ....,.,12
4.0 Final Environmental Impact Report_._,,..... ...... ....... ........,..................12
4.1 Response to Comments.-__.. ............ .........,.............12
4.2 Final EIR......................„.....,.,..,..,.....,...........,.........,................................................,....13
4.3 Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations.. ............13
5.0 EIR Project Coordination and Meetings......... .......,.,......,......,...13
5.1 Coordination............... ....................,...,..13
5.2 Meetings.............„.,.....,.....,..,,..,....,..„„....,...,..,..,.,................,..................................,...14
5.3 Public Notices...,.„.....„................................................................„...„,....„..,„............,....14
6.0 EIR Deliverables..............................„„,....„.......„...........,......,,....„,......„,,..................„......,...,......15
7.0 CEQA Clearance Option 2: Mitigated Negative Declaration.................. 16
7.1 Public Review Mitigated Negative Declaration.........................................................16
7.2 Final Review Mitigated Negative Declaration..................... ...... ....... ..........16
7.3 CEQA Notices....................................................... ...................................................17
8.0 MND Project Coordination and Meetings......................__...... ............17
8.1 Coordination...................................„.,„.„.....„.............,„......„..........,,..,..,..,..,..,.,.....,.....,.17
8.2 Meetings ......................................„........,.....„..,.,„.„......„..............„. ...„.,...., 17
9.0 MND Deliverables.............................„....,,..........,,....„..........,..,........,..,.....,..,......,..,.......,......„,.18
10.0 Optional Tasks........................................................................................................................18
10.1 In-N-Out Trip Generation Surveys....__ 18
10.2 Air Quality.................... .....................18
10.3 Climate Change Analysis................... .......... ....... ............ ................. ...__20
10.4 Noise.„................................„..,................. 20
10.5 Scoping Meeting...............................................-......,,................................................21
III. Preliminary CEQA Schedule,,,,.,,,,.,,.,,.,,.,........ ..........__...... ..... ..-.......„.,......„........,..,„..,..,.,,....,23
IV. Summary of Qualifications-,-,....-........... ........... ........... ...........__........ ....._____25
2 9 0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
V References.... ......... ....... ...... ....... .41
V1. Project Tearn................. ....... ............ ...... ....... ...43
vil, Liability Insurance .....---51
VIII. Statement of Financial Conditions............-,- .....-........... ................ .......................... ...53
lKBudget .......................... ................... ...........,.,.........—.55
ulVirw u°�^40 CitMEAeando�
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
III - 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
11 INTRODUCTION AND UNDERSTANDING OF
THE PROJECT
1.1 INTRODUCTION
RBF Consulting has submitted this Updated Proposal to prepare environmental compliance
documentation which will assess potential impacts and identify mitigation measures for the 600-630
North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center in the City of EI Segundo. The
environmental review and associated work products will be prepared in accordance with the criteria,
standards and provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, Section 21000 et.seq.
of the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.), the City of EI
Segundo Environmental Guidelines, and the regulations requirements and procedures of responsible
Public Agency with jurisdiction by law. RBF will, throughout the environmental review process, and
where appropriate, relate the proposed Project to the general trends in EI Segundo and the
surrounding area.
Each environmental issue area of study is approached thoroughly in order to fully assess all potential
impacts, establish thresholds of significance, and identify mitigation measures. RBF is the lead firm
for this work program and will provide services from our Corporate Headquarters in Irvine. Our
familiarity with environmental and land use issues involving commercial/retail projects coupled with
prior environmental review experience in EI Segundo are key assets that we will offer in order to
complete the environmental clearance for the project.
1.2 STATEMENT OF RBF'S COMMITMENT TO THE CITY
The following affirms RBF's commitment to the City of El Segundo and the proposed work program:
1. The proposed services to be provided bythe RBF Consulting team involve the preparation of
environmental compliance documentation, pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines,forthe 600-630
Nnrth Sanaa ilveda O igen EGthar�rn iara Shnnninn renter in R Segundo,Indo Califnrnia
2. RBF Consulting is focused on a comprehensive and complete review process. The RBF
team will provide services, pursuant to the goals set forth in the City's RFP, and as detailed
in Section II of this proposal.
3. RBF Consulting will thoroughly address each environmental issue area and will recommend
the appropriate CEQA clearance for the project. RBF Consulting holds as the top priority,the
integrity of documentation and processing,focusing on legal defensibility and full compliance
with CEQA.
4. All aspects of RBF Consulting's proposal, including costs, have been determined
independently,without consultation with any other prospective Consultant or competitors for
the purpose of restricting competition.
5. All declarations in RBF Consulting's proposal and attachments are true and constitute a
warranty, the falsity of which shall entitle the City to pursue any remedy by law.
JN 10-108518 • 1 January 30,2012
City of EI Segundo°
p " ''' Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
6. The RBF Consulting team agrees that all aspects of the City's RFP and follow-up RFP
Addendum and this January 30, 2012 proposal by RBF Consulting is binding, if the proposal
is selected and a contract is awarded.
7. The RBF Consulting team agrees to provide the City of EI Segundo with any other
information that the City determines to be necessary for an accurate determination of the
Consultant's ability to perform services as proposed.-
8. If RBF Consulting is selected for this and all other assignments with the City, RBF Consulting
will comply with all applicable rules, laws and regulations.
9. RBF has a dedicated team whom maintains the in-house Library/Filing Management System.
All project related files are categorized and independently filed to preserve the integrityof the
Administrative Record. Documentation of all project transactions are kept in a central file
readily accessible to project team members. Any public records actor Administrative Record
requests are coordinated with the Lead Agency, and implemented per applicable laws and
regulations.
10. RBF Consulting is agreeable to execute the City's Professional Services Agreement
enclosed with the RFP and to provide proof of insurance, as noted in the Agreement.
1.3 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT
It is RBF's understanding that the City of EI Segundo is seeking to retain a consultant to conduct
technical analysis and environmental review for a proposed fast food restaurant (In-N-Out Burger)
and renovation/modifications to the existing Queen Esther Square Center. The City is requesting a
two stage review process. A traffic impact analysis will be conducted. Based upon the traffic
analysis findings, the applicant will determine whether to continue the environmental review, which
will either be a focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Mitigated Negative Declaration.
The site is currently zoned General Commercial (C-3)and is consistent with the current General Plan
Land Use Designation of General Commercial. Surrounding land uses include: Office and Industrial
to the north and east, retail and food related shopping centers to the south and west.
The approved and constructed project includes a 33,700 square-foot L-shaped building situated
along the north and east property lines. The approved project also includes a freestanding 7,100
square foot family style sit-down restaurant(Sizzler)located on the southwest corner of the site. The
total approved building area of the project is approximately 41,000 square feet and the approved
parking consists of a 175-vehicle surface lot and a 63-vehicle subterranean parking structure for a
total of 242 spaces.
The proposed project involves two components:
The demolition of the existing sit-down family-style restaurant(Sizzler)and replacement with
a fast food restaurant with drive-through service(In-N-Out Burger). The fast food restaurant
is proposed to be 3,714 square-feet outdoor dining area is proposed. A 16 car drive-through
queuing lane is proposed. The proposed location of the In-N-Out Burger restaurant would
require reconfiguration of the existing parking lot on the south end of the property and result
in a net loss of parking spaces. The proposed project provides an ESMC compliant number
of parking spaces (231 spaces). The In-N-Out Burger portion of the project also includes EI
Segundo Municipal Code (ESMC)adjustment requests to: 1)allow for the encroachment of
JN 10-108518 • 2 • January 30, 2012
ii hl"gl+iii ul; itykiEll ind4� Md
; Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
6 00-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
u
k
the drive-through canopy into a required setback area; and 2)eliminate a required small truck
loading space (where one is required by ESMC).
• The project also involves modifications to the parking lot on the northwest portion of the site
to allow for the construction of an outdoor dining patio for patrons of the existing food service
establishments located in the"L-shaped"building. This 961 square-foot patio would resolve
long standing code enforcement issues with restaurants in-the shopping center provicting
unpermitted outdoor dining in violation of the original project conditions of approval. The new
patio would displace existing parking spaces on the site. The following changes to the
conditions of approval are requested in conjunction with the existing shopping center portion
of the project: 1) allow for outdoor dining; 2) allow two fast-food and two full service
restaurants and four food-to-go establishments in the L-shaped building instead of one fast
food, one full service and six food-to-go establishments; 3)ease restrictions on the location
of ATMs in the L-shaped building; and 4) modify the number of monument signs allowed on
the site.
Under the overall project management of the Director of Planning and Building Safety the selected
consultant will provide the following services:
Phase 1: Traffic Impact Analysis
• The following items are included in the Traffic Study: Project Description, Methodology,
Traffic Impact Criteria, Existing Conditions including existing intersection performance, Future
Traffic Conditions (Ambient Growth, Cumulative Projects Traffic, Future without Project
Traffic), Project Traffic (Trip Generation, Trip Distribution), Project Impacts (Future with
Project—lunch hour and peak hour traffic on weekdays and Saturdays, Existing with Project
— lunch hour and peak hour traffic on weekdays and Saturdays), and Mitigation Measures.
• Analysis of project access, on-site circulation, and adequacy of parking. Focus on the In-N-
Out Burger Drive-through queue is required. Any potential blocking of circulation or parking
stall access resulting from the operation of the drive-through will be analyzed. Additional
queuing surveys of representative In-N-Out Burger locations (such as Westchester,
Inglewood and Seal Beach) are required. Exiting from the proposed In-N-Out Burger drive-
through will be analyzed. Any circulation impacts from the proposed new outdoor dining area
associated with the L-shaped building will be analyzed. Site planning recommendations and
mitigation measures, if any, will be identified.
• Recommendations and suggestions for improvements to the function of the Sepulveda
Boulevard and Mariposa Avenue intersection.
Phase 2: Environmental Document
• Preparation of a Draft Initial Study and required notices.
• Preparation of the necessary administrative draft environmental document (Mitigated
Negative Declaration or Focused Environmental Impact Report).
• Production of a draft environmental document and distribution of the draft environmental
document (including tables, graphs, maps, etc.) to the State Clearinghouse. All tables,
graphs and maps must be formatted so that the material and data is legible when reproduced
in black and white.
JN 10-108518 • 3 • January 30, 2012
y f
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
PIP,
l' 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
• Responses to public and agency comments on draft document.
• Attendance and participation at a kick-off meeting with Staff, a kick-off meeting for the
environmental document phase with staff, a scoping meeting and a total of two(2)meetings
with the Planning Commission and City Council (one each) with an optional task for
additional meetings.
• Preparation of the final environmental document including mitigation monitoring program,
• Preparation of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations should one be
necessary.
• Revisions to any draft documents (revisions shall be presented in a red-line/strike-out format
for City staff review).
The proposed Project will have great interest and has the potential for scrutiny in the local
community. The City of EI Segundo has emphasized the need for a complete and diligent
environmental review work program which provides a clear understanding of environmental issues,
level of significance of impacts and mitigation to reduce potential affects. Ourwork program involves
a methodical step-by-step approach in order to validate the environmental clearance review andwill
result in full compliance with CEQA. Following the comprehensive Traffic Impact Technical Analysis,
the initial environmental review Phase will involve Project Scoping and documentation through an
Initial Study in order to confirm the potential for impacts and level of significance. Our findings will be
presented to City Staff and a determination will be rendered for processing either an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) or Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND).
The scale of the Project, as well as its geographical location will require careful consideration of the
analysis and conclusions of the environmental review. Careful consideration is necessary for on-site
conditions and compatibility of the project with the surrounding community. RBF will serve as an
extension of staff to assure that the entire CEQA process is conducted in a comprehensive manner,
which will include consideration of recent CEQA legislation and requirements of reviewing agencies.
The RBF project management team led by Mr. Glenn Lajoie,AICP, and Ms. Rita Garcia, will provide
regular and consistent communications and updates to staff on the progression of the work program
and status of the analysis.
The RBF Team will be viewed as an integral component in the project review and will participate in
meetings with staff and public hearings, as required by the City. The RBF Team will have the
responsibility of leading the public participation program for the environmental review, including
public scoping meetings and throughout the public hearing process for certification in accordance
with CEQA. The RBF Team will assist decision makers and the public in understanding the analysis,
conclusions of the environmental review and guide the entire CEQA review process. RBF has
served in this role with a countless number of agencies and with a wide range of projects of great
interest to communities.
JN 10-108518 ® 4 + January 30, 2012
� ��.+'°+�✓ � .;.spm ., "wm"�'
City of EI Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
. .... _ ._ . ,.,
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square uare Shoppin g Center
11. SOC601PE OF WORK
The following Scope of Work has been prepared based upon information received by RBF
Consulting. The cost estimate,which is itemized according to task and issue, is included in Section
IX of this proposal.
1.0 PROJECT SCOPINGITECHNICAL ANALYSIS
1.1 PROJECT KICK-OFFCHARACTERISTICS
The environmental review work program will be initiated with a kick-off meeting with City Staff to
discuss the project in greater detail. This initial meeting is vital to the success of the CEQA process
and will be a key milestone in order to confirm the parameters of the analysis, proposed buildout
conditions, scheduling and overall communications. Prior to the kick-off, RBF will distribute a kick-off
meeting agenda and detailed memorandum, which will identify information needs. Based upon the
detailed project information obtained at the project kick-off meeting, RBF will draft a preliminary
project description for review and approval by City Staff.
1.2 RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATION
RBF will obtain and review available referenced data for the project area, including policy
documentation from the City of EI Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State and Federal agencies,the
Southern California Association of Governments and all other agencies which may be affected bythe
Project. This information, along with environmental data and information available from the Cityand
other nearby jurisdictions,will become part of the foundation of the environmental review and will be
reviewed and incorporated into the analysis, as deemed appropriate. This task includes a visit to the
project area, which will include a detailed photographic recording of on- and off-site conditions.
1.3 TECHNICAL STUDIES
tour sual mt tV the f':4-
Imequest IVI F VpVSaI, INLJ VV iii prepare ti is Traffic Qi and Circ i.iiQtiui m r%maiy$i$,as
discussed in Task 1.3A below. RBF has also identified Optional Technical Analysis topics in Section
10.0 of this proposal (Optional Tasks). Based upon further discussions with City Staff and the
results of the Traffic Analysis, further review for Air Quality, Climate Change and Noise may be
required to confirm thresholds of significance and the CEQA determination.
A. Traffic and Circulation Analysis
The traffic study will assess traffic conditions and potential the impacts of the proposed project by
analyzing forecast trip generation, distribution, and assignment of the proposed project on the study
area circulation system. If necessary, mitigation measures for identified project-generated traffic
impacts will be recommended in accordance with applicable agency performance criteria and
thresholds of significance. This scope of work is based discussions with City staff and RBF
transportation staff's familiarity with the City of EI Segundo and the project site.
JN 10-108518 • 5 • January 30, 2012
429
City of EI Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
p 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
rc p
Studv Conditions. The traffic analysis will identify traffic operations under the following scenarios:
• Existing Conditions;
• Forecast Adjusted Existing Conditions;
• Forecast Existing Plus Project Conditions;
• Forecast Adjusted Existing Conditions Plus Project Conditions;
Forecast Project Opening Year Without Project Conditions; and
• Forecast Project Opening Year With Project Conditions.
A forecast adjusted existing conditions analysis scenario is included to reflect existing conditions at
the project site to be in compliance with City permits, not as currently operating. A long-range year
analysis is not included since the proposed project does not require either zone change or General
Plan Amendment, based on discussion with City staff. The analysis will study typical weekday a.m.
peak hour, mid-day peak hour, and p.m. peak hour conditions as well as typical Saturday a.m. peak
hour, mid-day peak hour and p.m. peak hour conditions.
Studv Area. Definition of the traffic study area is defined in correlation to the number trips a
proposed will generate; most simply, the larger the number of trips generated by a proposed project,
the larger the corresponding study area, and vice versa. The trip generation of the proposed project
will consist of the net number of trips after subtracting the trips currently generated by the Sizzler
restaurant from the trips forecast to be generated the proposed In-N-Out restaurant in conjunction
with the forecast change in forecast trip generation associated the proposed modification of uses in
the L-shaped building.
Without preparing the actual trip generation analysis for the proposed project that will be approved by
City staff prior to inclusion in the study, it is unclear at this proposal writing what the net number of
project site trips will be(based on discussions with City staff, an optional task is included in the Trip
Generation section of this proposal to survey up to three existing In-N-Out restaurants to forecast the
trip generation of the proposed In-N-Out restaurant instead of calculating the trip generation based
on published Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation for a fast food restaurant with
drive-through). Therefore, RBF proposes the study area consist of the following six (6) study
intersections in the vicinity of the project site, recognizing the study area could be adjusted(smaller
or larger) once the specific trip generation for the project site is determined (note, the fee for this
scope of work will be adjusted accordingly if the study area is adjusted):
1. Sepulveda Boulevard (SR-1)/Imperial Highway;
2. Sepulveda Boulevard (SR-1)[Walnut Avenue;
3. Sepulveda Boulevard (SR-1)/Maple Avenue;
4. Sepulveda Boulevard (SR-1)/Mariposa Avenue;
5. Sepulveda Boulevard (SR-1)/Grand Avenue; and
6. Sepulveda Boulevard (SR-1)/EI Segundo Boulevard.
RBF will count the above-listed study intersections on a typical weekday during the a.m. peak period
(7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.), the p.m. peak period (4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.), and two-hour mid-day peak
period, as well on a typical Saturday during the two-hour a.m. peak hour, two-hour mid-day peak
period and two-hour p.m. peak period. The precise two-hour mid-day peak periods and the two-hour
Saturday a.m. and p.m. peak periods will be identified in consultation with City staff based on review
of 24-hour driveway count data collected at the project site driveways to determine when the project
site is peaking in trip generation during those periods. The traffic impact analysis will utilize the
highest hour of traffic volume data collected at the study intersections within each two-hour peak
JN 10-108518 • 6 • January 30, 2012
y° f, I "unJ
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
I'Y 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
W r
period. This scope of work does not assume vehicle classification traffic count data collection,
however, vehicle classification counts can be accommodated for a fee in addition to the fee
associated with this scope of work.
Site Visit/Existinq Systems Documentation. RBF will visit the study area to document existing
conditions including intersection control,traffic signal phasing, roadway cross-section, speed limits,
parking restrictions, intersection approach lanes, etc. The traffic analysis will include graphics
documenting the existing intersection roadway geometry, and the analysis will utilize existing
geometric conditions to establish a baseline for current operations.
Cumulative P'roiects Trio Generation. Distribution, and Assignment. RBF will coordinate with City of
EI Segundo staff to identify a list of approved/pending projects for inclusion in the traffic impact
analysis for the ambient growth, cumulative analysis scenario. The study will identify the number of
daily and peak hour trips forecast to be generated by approved/pending projects, using trip
generation rates contained in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 8th Edition,
2008)or other source as directed by agency staff. RBF will manually derive cumulative projects trip
generation and assignment data, which will be reviewed and approved by applicable agency staff for
use in the analysis.
Pronosed Proiect TdD Generation. Trio Distribution. and Assi nment. The study will identify the
number of daily and peak hour trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project, using trip
generation rates contained in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 8th Edition,
2008.Assumptions regarding project trip generation will be reviewed and approved by City staff prior
to inclusion in the analysis. The traffic study will provide a forecast distribution of project-generated
trips. Manual trip distribution and corresponding trip assignment will be reviewed and approved by
City staff prior to utilization in the analysis.
Forecast Near-Term Year Traffic Volumes. Forecast near-term year traffic volumes will be based on
either specific cumulative projects traffic data supplied by City staff, and/or by applying an annual
traffic growth rate provided by the agency staff to adjust measured existing traffic volumes to the
designated future project-opening horizon year. Forecast near-term year conditions will assume
planned, programmed, and funded circulation improvements identified by City staff, anticipated for
completion by the protect-opening year.
Level of Service. The analysis will assess the forecast traffic conditions and potential traffic impacts
of the proposed project at the study intersections during peak hours and analysis scenarios identified
above. The analysis will document operation of the study intersections using both Intersection
Capacity Utilization (ICU)analysis methodology and the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis
methodology using TraffixTM software. If the analysis indicates the proposed project will significantly
impact the study intersections based on City of EI Segundo thresholds of significance, mitigation
measures will be recommended in accordance with established City performance criteria. The
analysis will document forecast operating conditions after implementation of any recommended
mitigation measures.
On-Site Parking/Circulation Analvsis. The analysis will include an onsite circulation analysis of the
proposed site, with a thorough focus of the queuing for the associated with the In-N-Out drive-
through window. The forecast queue at the drive-through window will be based on drive-through
queue data provided by the project applicant at three existing In-N-Out restaurants (Downey, Long
Beach, and Industry), as well as queue surveys collected by RBF as part of the analysis at three
other In-N-Out restaurants(such as Westchester, Inglewood, and Seal Beach). The queue analysis
JN 10-108518 • 7 • January 30, 2012
01
41 A
1 i
d
mA A. City of EI Segundo
"W'" Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
A
will evaluate whether the 16-vehicle queue storage identified on the project site for the In-N-Out
restaurant is adequate to accommodate the forecast queue. RBF will make recommendations to
reduce or eliminate potential onsite blocking of the parking area by the forecast drive-through queue
as well as issues associated with exiting the drive-through lane. The onsite circulation analysis will
also evaluate any potential issues associated with the proposed new outdoor seating area of the L-
shaped building. The onsite circulation analysis will also evaluate project site access. As part of the
onsite circulation analysis, RBF will determine the adequacy the onsite parking provided on the site
plan based on the City of EI Segundo Municipal Code in conjunction with the land use shown on the
site plan.
State Highway Intersection Analysis. All study area intersections are located on Sepulveda
Boulevard,which is a State Highway, designated SR-1 by Caltrans. The State Highway intersection
analysis will be prepared in accordance with the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact
Studies (State of California Department of Transportation, December 2002). The State Highway
study intersections will be analyzed utilizing the HCM analysis methodology in accordance with
Caltrans requirements. This scope of work assumes no State Highway mainline or freeway ramp
analysis is required.
The analysis will assess the forecast traffic conditions and potential traffic impacts of the proposed
project at the State Highway study intersections for the peak hours and analysis scenarios identified
above. The analysis will document operation of the study intersections for the analysis scenarios to
identify potential project-related traffic impacts using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000
analysis methodology.
If the State Highway analysis shows the proposed project will significantly impact a State Highway
facility based on Caltrans thresholds of significance, mitigation measures will be recommended in
accordance with Caltrans performance criteria. The analysis will also document forecast operating
conditions after application of any recommended mitigation measures.
1.4 PREPARATION OF THE INITIAL STUDY
The Initial Study will include detailed explanations of all checklist determinations and discussions of
Dotential environmental impacts. The analvsis will be Dreoared in accordance with Public Resources
Code Section 21080(c) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15070. The Initial Study will be structured in
the same format as Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. The Initial Study will contain a description
of the Project,the Project location, and a description of the environmental setting. The main body of
the document will consist of a City-approved environmental checklist and an accompanying
environmental analysis. This section will denote the appropriate CEQA action based upon the
Environmental Checklist/Environmental Analysis.
The Project will be analyzed for the potential to create significant environmental impacts in the areas
specified on the City's approved environmental checklist. The Initial Study will also include
mandatory findings of significance, long-term versus short-term goals,cumulative impacts,and direct
and indirect impacts upon human beings.
JN 10-108518 • 8 • January 30,2012
jd '.
cityf2o
�),• Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
I'^SIIIWII 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
q k
1.5 INITIAL STUDY FINDINGS AND MEETING WITH CITY STAFF
Once the Initial Study is completed, the RBF team will meet with City officials to review and discuss
the findings of the Initial Study review. Based upon the results of consultations and, as directed by
City officials, the RBF team will proceed forward and initiate CEQA compliance documentation and
the processing of an Environmental Impact Report(EIR)or Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)in
accordance with either Optional Task 2.0 or 7.0.
2.0 CEQA CLEARANCE OPTION 1:
PREPARATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EIR
The EIR will include the Introduction and Purpose, Executive Summary and Project Description. The
Environmental Analysis section will evaluate the necessary information with respect to the existing
conditions,the potential adverse effects of Project construction and implementation (both individual
and cumulative), and measures to mitigate such effects. Environmental issues raised during the
scoping process (Notice of Preparation responses; Public Scoping mailing; and any other relevant
and valid informative sources)will also be evaluated. The environmental analysis section of the EIR
will thoroughly discuss the existing conditions for each environmental issue area; identify short-term
and long-term environmental impacts associated with the project and their levels of significance.
Feasible mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce the significance of impacts and identify
areas of unavoidable significant adverse impacts even after mitigation. The environmental review
(Task 2.7)will focus on the comprehensive review of the following topical areas:
• Air Quality(see Optional Task 10.2)
• Climate Change analysis (see Optional Task 10.3)
• Noise (see Optional Task 10.4)
• Traffic and Circulation (see Task 1.3A)
RBF will complete the environmental review process, respond to all comments received during the
Draft EIR public review period, prepare the mitigation monitoring program and draft the necessary
Findings and possible Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to Sections 15091 and
15093 of the CEQA Guidelines The environmental revie:".,process Will ro—dt in the presentation of
pertinent information associated with Project impacts and findings to the City decision makers for
determination and CEQA certification.
2.1 NOTICE OF PREPARATION
RBF will prepare, distribute and file the Notice of Preparation (NOP)for the EIR. A Draft NOP will be
prepared and forwarded to City Staff for review and comment. RBF will then finalize the NOP for
distribution. The distribution of the NOP and Initial Study as an attachment will be based on a City-
approved distribution list to be provided by City staff. This task includes certified mailing to affected
agencies and interested parties. Comments received in response to the NOP will be evaluated
during the preparation of the EIR.
JN 10-108518 • 9 • January 30,2012
h p
D y e�I
4 nul
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation
M 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
2.2 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
The Introduction will cite the provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City of EI Segundo
CEQA Implementation procedures for which the proposed project is subject. This section will identify
the purpose of the study and statutory authority as well document scoping procedures, summary of
the EIR format, listing of responsible and trustee agencies and documentation incorporated by
reference.
2.3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Executive Summary will include a Project Summary, an overview of project impacts, mitigation
and levels of significance after mitigation, summary of project alternatives and areas of controversy
and issues to be resolved. The Environmental Summary will be presented in a columnar format.
2.4 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
This section will provide a comprehensive description of thresholds of significance for each issue
area of the environmental analysis. The significance threshold criteria will be described and will
provide the basis for conclusions of significance. Primary sources to be used in identifying the
criteria include the CEQA Guidelines, local, State, Federal or other standards applicable to an impact
category.
2.5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project Description section of the EIR will detail the project location, background and history of
the project, discretionary actions, characteristics (addressed in Task 1.1), goals and objectives,
construction program, phasing, agreements, and required permits and approvals that are required
based on available information. This section will include a summary of the Project's local
environmental setting for the project. Exhibits depicting the regional and site vicinity will be included
in this section.
A111 CUMULATIVE PROjECTSIANALYSIS
In accordance with Section 15130 of the CEQA Guidelines,the EIR will include a section providing a
detailed listing of cumulative projects and actions under consideration for the analysis. The
likelihood of occurrence and level of severitywill be studied. The purpose of the section is to present
a listing and description of projects, past, present and anticipated in the reasonably foreseeable
future, even if those projects are outside of EI Segundo'jurisdiction. The potential for impact and
levels of significance are contingent upon the radius or area of interaction with the project area. RBF
will consult with City staff and other applicable local jurisdictions to define the appropriate studyarea
for the cumulative analysis. The cumulative analysis for each topical area will be incorporated
throughout the analysis in Section 2.7.
JN 1 0-1 0851 8 • 10 • January 30, 2012
. u
City of EI Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
r a
2.7 ENVIRONMENTAL A ALYI
RBF will evaluate the necessary information with respect to the existing conditions, the potential
adverse effects of Project implementation (both individual and cumulative),and measures to mitigate
such effects. Environmental issues raised during the scoping process (Notice of Preparation
responses, Public Scoping Meeting, and any other relevant and valid informative sources)will also
be evaluated. The analyses will be based upon all available data, results from additional research,
and an assessment of existing technical data.
The Environmental Analysis section of the EIR will thoroughly discuss the existing conditions for
each environmental issue area; identify short-term construction and long-term operational impacts
associated with the project and their levels of significance. The impact analysis will be in a
consistent order of environmental factors as Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines (Aesthetics, Air
Quality, etc.). For each Environmental Factor Analysis Section, the Impacts Subsection will begin
with a list of all issues contained in the Initial Study. The thresholds for significance shall be
identified for every environmental issue. A brief discussion will be provided for all environmental
issues determined to be No Impact or Less Than Significant Impact in the Initial Study, explaining
why these determinations were made and that no further analysis in the EIR is warranted. The
Impact Subsection will provide a detailed analysis of each issue determined to be Less Than
Significant With Mitigation incorporated or Potentially Significant Impact. For each environmental
issue, the EIR will state the level of significance of impact, and provide the analysis discussion,
mitigation measures specific to the environmental issue, and level of significance after mitigation.
2.8 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
It is anticipated that there will be great interest and concern for development of project site and the
Alternatives section will provide the opportunity to compare and contrast optional conditions for the
property. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, RBF will provide an analysis which will
compare environmental impacts of each alternative for each impact area to the project. For each
alternative, RBF will provide both quantitative and qualitative analysis for topical areas. One
important element of the Alternatives section will be an impact matrix which will offer a comparison
of the varying levels of impact of each alternative being analyzed. This matrix will be prepared in a
format to allow decisl�^.n_mrnV rs a referen", that Alill he easily understood, :"while providing n
calculated (where feasible), accurate comparison of each alternative.
The alternatives section will conform to both amendments to Section 15126.6 of the CEQA
Guidelines and to recent and applicable court cases. RBF will discuss as required by the CEQA
Guidelines, the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative and the reasons for rejecting or
recommending the project alternatives stated. This alternatives section will culminate with the
selection of the environmentally superior alternative in accordance with CEQA requirements.
2.9 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
To comply with the Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 (AB 32180), RBF will prepare a
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to be defined through working with City staff to identify
appropriate monitoring steps/procedures and in order to provide a basis for monitoring such
measures during and upon Project implementation.
.......,,
JN 10-108518 • 11 January 30,2012
ail ��� dmi II oyd'V
1"
pl^fv^ 11 !City of El Segun+ o �
jli,„, Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist will serve as the foundation of the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program for the proposed Project. The Checklist indicates the mitigation
measure number as outlined in the EIR, the EIR reference page (where the measure is
documented), a list of Mitigation Measure/Conditions of Approval (in chronological order under the
appropriate topic), the Monitoring Milestone (at what agency/department responsible for verifying
implementation of the measure), Method of Verification (documentation, field checks, etc.), and a
verification section for the initials of the verifying individual date of verification,and pertinent remarks.
2.10 ADDITIONAL SECTIONS
RBF will provide additional sections in the EIR to meet CEQA and City requirements including the
following: Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes That Would Be Involved In the Proposed
Action Should It Be Implemented, Effects Found Not To Be Significant, Inventory of Unavoidable
Adverse Impacts, and Organizations and Persons Consulted/Bibliography.
2.11 GRAPHIC EXHIBITS
The EIR will include a maximum of 20 exhibits to enhance the written text and clarify the proposed
Project environmental impacts. Using state-of-the-art computer design equipment and techniques,
our in-house graphic design team will create professional quality, black and white or full color
exhibits, dividers and covers for the EIR and Appendices. This Task assumes camera-ready base
maps are provided by the City. All exhibits will be 8.5” x 11" in size.
3.0 DRAFT EIR
3.1 PRELIMINARY DRAFT EIR
RBF will respond to one complete set of City comments on the Administrative Draft EIR. If desired
by the City, RBF will provide the Preliminary Draft of the EIR with all changes highlighted to assist the
final check of the document.
n n i+� ��■ �. �+r .r DRAFT ■s
.7.L CO E 1 1 ■VI Vr ■ E Y F■ ■R
RBF will respond to a second review of the Preliminary Draft EIR and will prepare the report for the
required 45-day public review period. In addition, RBF will prepare the Notice of Completion (NOC)
for submittal to the Office of Planning and Research (OPR). RBF will also work with the City to
develop a distribution listing for the NOC and Draft EIR.
4.0 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
4.1 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
RBF will respond to comments received on the Draft EIR during the 45-day public review period,and
any additional comments raised during hearings that occur during the 45-day review. RBF will
prepare thorough, reasoned and sensitive responses to relevant environmental issues. This task
includes written responses to both written and oral comments received on the Draft EIR (includes
review of hearing transcripts, as required). The Draft Responses to Comments will be prepared for
JN 10-108518 . 12 9 January 30, 2012
N
rµ/
ux^r'' 1�W iC iI�N ilk
4290 .
City of EI Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
Nm
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
review by City staff. Following review of the Draft Responses to Comments, RBF will finalize this
section for inclusion in the Final EIR.
It is noted that it is unknown at this time the extent of public and agency comments that will result
from the review process. RBF has budgeted conservatively, given the potential scrutiny involved
with the proposed project. Should the level of comments and response exceed our estimate, RBF
will submit additional funding requests to the City in order to complete the responses.
4.2 FINAL EIR
The Final EIR will consist of the revised Draft EIR text, as necessary, and the "Comments to
Responses" section. The Draft EIR will be revised in accordance with the responses to public
comments on the EIR. To facilitate City review, RBF will format the Final EIR with shaded text for
any new or modified text, and "strike out' any text which has been deleted from the Final EIR. RBF
will also prepare and file the Notice of Determination within five(5)days of EIR approval. This scope
of work excludes the required fees for the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG).
4.3 FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
RBF will provide administrative assistance to facilitate the CEQA process including the preparation of
the Notice of Determination, Statement of Overriding Considerations and Findings for City use in the
Project review process. RBF will prepare the Findings in accordance with the provisions of Section
15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines and in a form specified by the City. RBF will submit
the Draft Findings for City review and will respond to one set of City comments.
5.0 EIR PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS
5.1 COORDINATION
Mr. Glenn Lajoie,AICP, and Ms. Rita Garcia will be responsible for management and supervision of
the EIR Project Team as well as consultation with the City staff to incorporate City policies into the
EIR. Mr. Lajoie- and Ms. Garcia will undertake consultation and coordination of the Project and
review the EIR for compliance with CEQA requirements and guidelines and City CEQA procedures.
RBF will coordinate with state and local agencies regarding this environmental document. Mr.Lajoie
and Ms. Garcia will coordinate with all technical staff, consultants, support staff and word processing
toward the timely completion of the EIR. It is the goal of RBF to serve as an extension of City staff
throughout the duration of the EIR Project. As is stated in Understanding of the Project, RBF will be
available to meet with staff to discuss particular Project parameters, as required by the City. In
addition, as requested, RBF will provide detailed progress reports on a monthly basis. All progress
reports will include the status of documents currently in production, delivery dates of documents,
upcoming meetings with City Staff, and any outstanding items to be resolved at that time. Each
progress report will include a summary of tasks performed and the percentage of work completed to
date according to individual task.
JN 10-108518 • 13 • January 30, 2012
1
4 2
City of E Se,qu do,
NFI�
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
w
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
p III
5.2 MEETINGS
Mr. Lajoie, and/or Ms. Garcia, will attend all staff meetings and will represent the Project Team at
public hearings and make presentations as necessary. RBF anticipates several meetings with City
staff, including a "kick-off meeting" (refer to Task 1.1), progress meetings, public meetings and
hearings. Mr. Lajoie and Ms. Garcia along with other key Project Team personnel will also be
available to attend meetings with affected jurisdictions, agencies and organizations as needed to
identify issues, assess impacts and define mitigation. Should the City determine that additional
meetings beyond the following meetings are necessary, services will be provided under a separate
scope of work on a time and materials basis. The estimated cost for additional meetings considers
six hours per person, which accounts for preparations, attendance and travel.
• One Kickoff meeting (refer to Task 1.1).
• Progress meetings with City Staff assumes two (2) meetings to provide written and oral
progress reports, resolve issues, review comments on Administrative documents and receive
any necessary direction from City Staff.
• Up to two (2) public hearings with presentations as necessary. This includes Planning
Commission and City Council meetings.
5.3 PUBLIC NOTICES
RBF will prepare, submit, and mail all CEQA public notices required for the proposed project. Public
notices are anticipated to include:
• Notice of Preparation: As stated above within Task 2.1, RBF will prepare the NOP for the
proposed project to initiate the 30-day NOP public review period. RBF will distribute the NOP
to appropriate agencies, parties, and individuals (including the State Clearinghouse). RBF
will also post the NOP at the County Clerk.
• Notice of Availability: RBF will prepare a Notice of Availability(NOA)to be distributed at the
onset of the 45-day public review period for the project. The NOA will include required
project information, such as a brief project description, the start/end dates of the public
+• I .4 • -r :__ F.review period, locations where + e LEID is available for revievd, anu contact iito a+uii
iui
City staff.
• Notice of Completion: RBF will prepare a Notice of Completion for submittal to the State
Clearinghouse at the onset of both the 30-day NOP public review period and the 45-day EIR
public review period. The NOC will follow the format recommended by the State
Clearinghouse.
• Notice of Determination: As stated above within Task 4.2, RBF will prepare a Notice of
Determination, to be filed with the County Clerk and sent to the State Clearinghouse within
five days of EIR certification. This scope of work excludes payment of any CDFG filing fees,
if applicable.
This scope assumes that the Citywould be responsible for any radius mailing or newspaper notices
required for the proposed project.
JN 10-108518 • 14 • January 30,2012
429
City of EI Segbn o�
P Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
a h
■
0 EIR DELIVERABLES
The following is a breakdown of all products/deliverables. The listed deliverables assume a standard
number of deliverables for a project of this type and can be adjusted, as directed by the City. RBF
can also provide a cost, per document, and can provide billing on a time and materials basis, as
requested by the City.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
• Five (5) copies of the Administrative Draft Technical Studies
• Five (5) copies of the Final Draft Technical Studies
• Administrative and Final Drafts in Microsoft Word 2003 Format
• One (1) Electronic Copy of the Administrative and Final Drafts in Adobe Acrobat (PDF)
Format
PROJECT SCOPING
• Twenty(20) copies of the Notice of Preparation
• Twenty (20) copies of the Initial Study
• Forty (40) CD versions of the NOP/Initial Study
• One (1) Camera-Ready Unbound Copy
• One (1) Electronic Copy of the NOP/Initial Study
PREPARATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EIR
• Five (5) copies of the Administrative Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• Five (5) CD's containing the Administrative Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• One (1) electronic copy in Microsoft Word 2003 Format
• One (1) electronic copy in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) Format
DRAFT EIR
• Five (5) copies of the Second Administrative Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• Five (5) CD's containing the Second Administrative Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• One (1) electronic copy of the Second Administrative Draft EIR and Exhibits
• Twenty (20) copies of the Draft EIR with Technical Appendices
• Forty(40) CD's containing the Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• Sixty(60) copies of the Notice of Completion
• One (1) camera-ready unbound original of the Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• One (1) electronic copy in Microsoft Word 2003 Format of the Draft EIR and Technical
Appendices
• One (1) electronic copy in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) Format
JN 10-108518 • 15 • January 30, 2012
city o "EI e6u " u
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
j' A 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
. a. w
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
• Five (5) copies of the Draft Responses to Comments
• One (1) electronic copy of the Response to Comments
• Five (5) copies of the Administrative Final EIR and Technical Appendices
• Five (5) CD's containing the Administrative Final EIR Technical Appendices
• Fifteen (15) copies of the Final EIR and Technical Appendices
• Fifteen (15) CD's containing the Final EIR and Technical Appendices
• One(1)unbound camera-ready original of the Final EIR, Exhibits and Technical Appendices
• One (1) electronic copy of the Final EIR and Technical Appendices in Microsoft Word 2003
Format
• One (1) electronic copy in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) Format
• Five (5) copies of the Draft Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
• One (1) camera-ready Final Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
• One (1) electronic copy of the Final Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
• One (1) camera-ready Notice of Determination
• One (1) camera-ready Notice of Completion
7.0 CEQA CLEARANCE OPTION 2:
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
RBF will update the Initial Study in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines(see Task 1.4). The Initial
Study, in support of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, will include detailed explanations of all
checklist determinations and discussions of potential environmental impacts. The analysis shall be
in accordance with Sections 15063, 15162, 15167 and 15168 of the CEQA statutes.
7.1 PUBLIC REVIEW MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Should the Initial Study conclude that no significant environmental effects will occur, a Mitigated
Negative Declaration (MND) will be prepared. Following this determination, RBF will prepare the
Notice of Availability(NOA)and the MND for City Staff review. The NOA and MND will be attached
to the Initiai Study to fully explain the proposed project and its effects. RBF will submit the iS/MND to
the State Clearinghouse. This task excludes radius mailing or newspaper noticing required for public
review. The IS/MND would be subject to a mandatory 30-day public review period.
7.2 FINAL REVIEW MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
RBF will prepare a draft Final IS/MND for City review and approval. RBF will respond to comments
on the draft final document. The final document will include a purpose subsection, reference the
review process, comments letters received, responses to comments,and any required edits/updates
to the Public Review document. Also included within this task is the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program (MMRP)in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(AB 3180).
RBF will provide written responses to each agency/interested party who submitted a comment letter
during the 30-day public review period. After the close of the required public review period for the
mitigated negative declaration, RBF and City Staff will review the comment letters received during
the public review period. Should the level of comments/ responses exceed our budgetary
JN 10-108518 • 16 • January 30, 2012
'u 614 11
.1
4290 . "
City of EI Segundo
"p ui,• Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
assumptions, RBF will confer with City Staff to determine scope/budget amendments which may be
necessary.
Upon adoption of the IS/MND, RBF will prepare and file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the
County Clerk. This task assumes that the NOD will be filed by the City. Additionally, this scope of
work excludes the required fees for the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG).
7.3 CEQA NOTICES
RBF will be responsible for the preparation of CEQA notices (Notice of Availability/Notice of Intent
(refer to Deliverables Task 9.0), Negative Declaration, and Notice of Determination). RBF will
prepare the agency distribution lists. RBF has assumed that City Staff will be responsible for public
noticing to comply with City requirements, such as posting notices or newspaper notices. RBF will
circulate notices to designated reviewing agencies.
8.0 MND PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS
8.1 COORDINATION
Mr. Glenn Lajoie, AICP, and Ms. Rita Garcia will be responsible for management and supervision of
the Project Team as well as consultation with the City staff to incorporate City policies into the MND.
Mr. Lajoie and Ms. Garcia will undertake consultation and coordination of the Project and review the
MND for compliance with CEQA requirements and guidelines and City CEQA procedures. RBF will
coordinate with state and local agencies regarding this environmental document. Mr.Lajoie and Ms.
Garcia,will coordinate with all technical staff, consultants, support staff and word processing toward
the timely completion of the MND. It is the goal of RBF to serve as an extension of City staff
throughout the duration of the EIR Project. As is stated in Understanding of the Project, RBF will be
available to meet with staff to discuss particular Project parameters, as required by the City. In
addition, as requested, RBF will provide detailed progress reports on a monthly basis. All progress
reports will include the status of documents currently in production, delivery dates of documents,
upcoming meetings with City Staff, and any outstanding items to be resolved at that time. Each
proqress report will include a summary_ of tasks performed and the percentage of work completed to
date according to individual task.
8.2 MEETINGS
Mr. Lajoie, and/or Ms. Garcia, will attend all staff meetings and will represent the Project Team at
public hearings and make presentations as necessary. RBF anticipates several meetings with City
staff, including a "kick-off meeting" (refer to Task 1.1), progress meetings, public meetings and
hearings. Mr. Lajoie and Ms. Garcia along with other key Project Team personnel will also be
available to attend meetings with affected jurisdictions, agencies and organizations as needed to
identify issues, assess impacts and define mitigation. Should the City determine that additional
meetings beyond the following meetings are necessary, services will be provided under a separate
scope of work on a time and materials basis. The estimated cost for additional meetings considers
six hours per person, which accounts for preparations, attendance and travel.
• Progress meetings with City Staff assumes two (2) meetings to provide written and oral
progress reports, resolve issues, review comments on Administrative documents and receive
any necessary direction from City Staff.
JN 1 0-1 0851 8 • 17 • January 30,2012
wA J
M City of El Segundo
�'"' Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
p W
Two (2) public hearings with presentations as necessary. This includes Planning
Commission and City Council meetings.
9.0 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DELIVERABLES
Five (5) copy of Administrative Draft MND/Initial Study
• Five (5) CD's containing the Administrative Draft MND/Initial Study
• Five (5) "Check Copies" of Draft MND/Initial Study
• One (1) PDF file of the Draft Initial Study and "Check Copy' Drafts
• Twenty(20) copies of Draft MND/Initial Study
• One (1) camera-ready original of Draft Initial Study
a Forty (40) CDs with electronic PDF version of Draft Initial Study, Graphics and Technical
Appendices (including 15 copies for State Clearinghouse which will include an Executive
Summary attachment)
• Draft Notice of Availability/Notice of Intent
One (1) camera-ready original of Draft Comment and Responses
One (1) PDF version of Draft Comment and Responses
a Fifteen (15) copies of Final MND/Initial Study
One (1) Camera-Ready Original of Final Initial Study
• One (1) CD with electronic PDF version of Final Initial Study, Graphics, and Technical
Appendices
• Fifteen (15) CDs of Final Initial Study, Graphics and Technical Appendices in Microsoft Word.
10.0 OPTIONAL TASKS
The following tasks have been included so that the City may consider additional scoping items at this
time. These tasks have not been calculated into the total budget.
10.1 IN-N-OUT TRIP GENERATION SURVEYS
R CC d di�+ ss.;on with r'it + f+ +� r.��l '�nll Id in +i_ I+�oL+�n�n !i in++�11n goner +1' ...
I..IaJGU Vi 11 UEJLU Ji Vii YYiii iJl y staff i,this proposal Il IVIG- eJ Gi i optional iGJi\iV LVI IUULI vl fl.i yGl iGi ati Vi i
surveys at up to three existing In-N-Out restaurants to determine the forecast lunch and dinner peak
hour trip generation of the proposed In-N-Out restaurant instead of calculating the trip generation
based on published Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation for a fast food restaurant
with drive-through).
10.2 AIR QUALITY
Air quality is often a potentially significant impact for similar type projects in Southern California.
RBF's air quality staff will provide a thorough and complete assessment of the Project's air quality
impacts. The proposed Project would result in demolition, construction, and operational-related
emissions of air pollutants. In recognition of the need to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the
project's impacts on air quality, RBF's Air QualityAnaiysis will quantify project emissions and identify
mitigation measures to reduce potentially significant air quality impacts to the extent feasible. RBF's
analysis will primarily follow guidance contained in the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook. RBF's scope of work for the air quality review includes the
following:
JN 10-108518 • 18 • january 30, 2012
-,M- 41.1, !71vii
r City of EI Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
uu� 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
� µ
Existinq Conditions. The project is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB),which is under
the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). RBF will describe
the meteorological conditions and discuss ambient air monitoring data collected at the nearest
monitoring station which is located at Los Angeles International Airport, along West Winchester
Parkway. A description of the regulatory framework relating to air quality(i.e., California Clean Air
Act, Air Quality Management Plan, etc.)will also be provided. -
Standards and Conditions. A summary of current air quality management efforts will be provided. A
summary of the relevant policies, rules, and regulations from the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), CARB (i.e., California Clean Air Act, Air Quality Attainment Plans, etc.), and the
SCAQMD will also be provided.
Sensitive Reports. An overview of the nature and location of existing sensitive receptors will be
provided. The sensitive receptors would include, but not be limited to residences and schools in the
project area.
Demolition/Construction-Related Emissions. Short-term dust and emission generation due to
demolition and construction activities will be estimated quantified for both development options.
Based on data provided by the project applicant, detailed estimates of the potential construction
activities will be calculated.A general description of the major phases of construction and their timing
will be required. The air pollutant emissions during demolition and construction will be compared to
the SCAQMD Regional and Local Significance Thresholds. RBF will also qualitatively discuss
naturally occurring asbestos impacts.
Operational Air Emissions. RBF will quantify operational emissions then provide a comparison to the
SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for both development options. The emissions will be
quantitatively derived utilizing the EMFAC2007 and URBEMIS2007 models. Primary sources of
emissions will be related to area sources and local/regional vehicle miles traveled. Project
consistency with the SCAQMD's 2007 Air Quality Management Plan for the South Coast Air Basin
will be evaluated.
ncali-argil Emicci
Innc rnncictant with tha o,(: 1( KAn envlrnnminntal ii ictice nrnnram and Localized
.. ..... ..........J...,,..... r,. y.
Significance Threshold (LST) methodologies, RBF will identify impacts using SCAQMD's localized
thresholds or the Ambient Air Quality Standards to identify localized emissions impacts. RBF will
identify mitigation measures, if necessary, to reduce emissions to less than significant levels.
Should project traffic warrant Carbon Monoxide Hotspot modeling, RBF will model intersections
utilizing the BREEZE ROADS model.The analysis will be consistent with the Transportation Project-
Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol, prepared by the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University
of California, Davis.
JN 10-108518 0 19 0 January 30,2012
�. A
M City of b Segundo ,
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
rllllVl 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
10.3 CLIMATE CHANGE ANALYSIS
RBF's climate change experts are at the forefront in developing sound scientific regulatory
assessments and strategies within the rapidly changing regulatory environment. As the climate
change analytical methodologies evolve, RBF continues to offer its Clients/Agencies the highest
quality analytical, policy, and business management services. RBF has developed proprietary
models for quantifying and analyzing greenhouse gases (GHG)from a variety of direct and indirect
sources including construction, vehicular traffic, electricity consumption, water conveyance, and
sewage treatment. RBF's analyses recommend innovative greenhouse gas/air pollutant reduction
methods during the construction and operation of a project, conduct advanced air dispersion
modeling, evaluate the potential impacts of air pollutants on surrounding areas, investigate the use
of renewable energy sources/energy efficient products, and quantify the benefits of resource
conservation (i.e., electricity usage, recycling, etc.). The following outlines RBF's Climate Change
Analysis for the proposed project:
Emissions Inventorv. RBF will review the land use data associated with each Development Option.
Based on this review, RBF will prepare an inventory of the greenhouse(GHG)emissions(i.e.,nitrous
oxide, methane, and carbon dioxide)from both direct and indirect sources. The emissions inventory
will be compiled consistent with the methodology prescribed by the California Air Resources Board
(CARB) in the Local Government Operations Protocol for the Quantification and Reporting of
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories.
The analysis will determine the project's impact by determining if it is consistent with the Assembly
Bill 32 mandate of reducing GHG's by approximately 29 percent beyond "Business as Usual"
conditions. The GHG reduction associated with the project's design features and potential mitigation
measures will be quantified utilizing the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association
(CAPCOA) methodology(Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures—A Resource for Local
Government to Assess Emission Reductions from Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures[September
2010]).
Energv Conservation. RBF will analyze the energy implications of the project pursuant to Public
Resources Code Section 21100(b)(3)and Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines. These statutes and
guidelines require Coiil IICfl li..G UVL+UIiii-.ri1 aLiVii to UO3ci1 G, where relevant, the tiYgJlGldii,
inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy caused by a project. The analysis will analyze
energy consumption associated with short-term construction activities, long-term operations,
buildings, and transportation. Additionally, the assessment of environmental impacts on energy
resources will include mitigation measures to reduce inefficient and unnecessary consumption of
energy.
10.4 NOISE
RBF's in-house acoustical team will conduct the noise analysis. In consideration of nearbysensitive
receptors, the scope of work is as follows:
Existing Conditions. RBF will review applicable noise and land use compatibility criteria for the project
area. Noise standards regulating noise impacts in the noise standards for the City of EI Segundo will be
discussed for land uses on and adjacent to the project sites.
JN 10-108518 • 20 • January 30, 2012
x City of El Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
GW
RBF will conduct a site visit and conduct short-term noise level measurements along the project area.
Noise monitoring equipment will consist of a Br0el&Kjaer model 2250 sound level meter(SLM)equipped
with Bruel&Kjaer pre-polarized freefield microphone.The results of the noise measurements will be post-
processed and graphically illustrated with the Bruel&Kjagr Noise Explorer software. The noise monitoring
survey will include short-term measurements at up to four separate locations to establish baseline noise
levels in the project area. This scope also includes one-long-term measurement(24-hour duration)on the
project site-to account for the daily fluctuation in ambient noise levels.
Demolition/Construction-Related Noise. Demolition/construction would occur during implementation
of the proposed project. Noise impacts from construction sources will be analyzed for both
development options based on the equipment, construction task, equipment type, horsepower, load
factor, and percentage of time in use. The construction noise impacts will be evaluated in terms of
maximum levels (Lmax) and hourly equivalent continuous noise levels (L..) and the frequency of
occurrence at adjacent sensitive locations.Analysis requirements will be based on the sensitivity of
the area and the Noise Ordinance specifications of the City of EI Segundo. The traffic noise levels
from construction workers accessing the site will be qualitatively evaluated.
O,oerationa/Noise Sources. The proposed project is anticipated to generate vehicular traffic trips
from future growth. On-and off-site noise impacts from vehicular traffic will be assessed using the
U.S. Federal Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Models (FHWA-RD-77-108 and TNM 2.5).
10.5 SCOPING MEETING
A public scoping meeting, which can also involve Federal, State or other local agencies, will be
scheduled during the NOP public review period, in order that the community can gain an
understanding of the proposed project and provide comments on environmental concerns. The
Scoping Meeting will orient the community on the CEQA review process and will be presented in a
manner which the community can gain a greater understanding of the proposal, intent of CEQA and
the key issue areas to be addressed in the EIR. RBF will provide a PowerPoint presentation handout
and presentation-size graphics to supplement the discussion. Following the presentation, the
meeting will be devoted to public participation, questions and comments. Written comment forms
will be provided for this purpose, and these comments, along with oral comments,will become a part
of the administrative record.
JN 10-108518 • 21 January 30, 2012
W
w City of El Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda QueenEsther uare Shopping Center,-
qw
This page intentionally left blank.
.,,'Pa.
City of EInc :)
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
M 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
N
IllICll��lull
■
PRELIMINARY CEQA SCHEDULE*
The following preliminary schedule assumes authorization to proceed with the work program in
February 2012. Several work tasks may be adjusted and streamlined in order to further accelerate
the schedule. A date-specific schedule will be provided at the project kickoff.
INITIAL STUDY REVIEW
Project Kickoff Meeting Month 1
RBF Prepares Draft Project Description Month 1
City Review of Draft Project Description Month 1
RBF Completes Project Description Month 1
RBF Research and Investigation Month 1
Traffic and Circulation Months 1 - 3
RBF Prepares Draft Initial Study Month 3
City Review of Draft Initial Study Month 3
RBF Completes Initial Study Months 3 -4
Initial Study Findings Meeting with City Months 3 -4
CEQA OPTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Notice of Preparation/Initial Study Month 4
30-Day NOP Public Review Month 4
EIR Scoping Meeting Month 4
Administrative Draft EIR Preparation Months 4 - 5
City Review of Administrative Draft EIR Month 6
Preliminary Draft EIR Preparation Months 6 - 7
City Review of Preliminary Draft EIR Month 7
Complete, Publish, Circulate Draft EIR Month 8
45-Day Public Review Period Months 8 - 9
Hearing during the Draft EIR Review to receive Comments Month 9
RBF prepares Responses to Comments Month 9
City Review of Responses to Comments Month 9
RBF Prepares Administrative Final EIR Month 9
City Review of Administrative Final EIR Month 9
JN 10-108518 • 23 • January 30, 2012
u
City of EI Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
VIVA
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
Complete, Publish, Circulate Final EIR Month 10
Certification Hearings TBD
CEQA OPTION 2: MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Administrative Draft MND Preparation Months 4 - 5
City Review of Administrative Draft MND Month 5
Preliminary Draft MND Preparation Month 5
City Review of Preliminary Draft MND Month 6
Complete, Publish, Circulate MND Month 6
30-Day Public Review Period Months 6 - 7
RBF Prepares Response to Comments Month 7
City Review of Response to Comments Month 7
RBF Prepares Administrative Final MND Month 8
City Review of Administrative Final MND Month 8
Complete, Publish, Circulate Final MND Month 8
Certification Hearings TBD
The schedule considers on-going coordination and meetings with the project team through the duration of
the project.
JN 10-108518 • 24 • January 30,2012
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
■
SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS
RBF Consulting is a multi-disciplinary planning and engineering firm with offices in Orange,
Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, San Diego, Contra Costa, Marin, Monterey, and Sacramento
counties. With over 65 years of public and private sector experience, RBF is respected and
recognized in the profession of consulting planning, environmental, and engineering services
throughout the state of California. RBF has in-house expertise in disciplines including Environmental
Analysis, Planning, GIS Services, Surveying, Aerial Photogrammetry, Mapping, Real Estate
Assessments, Transportation/Traffic Engineering, Civil Engineering (including Grading, Public
Works, Water/Wastewater, Hydrology), Mechanical/ Electrical/Energy Services, Computer Aided
Design and Drafting (CADD)and Media Services. Over 60 professionals are dedicated to Planning,
Environmental Services and Landscape Architecture.
RBF possesses the full range of disciplines necessary to provide turn-key planning, design and
implementation of a wide range of projects. We combine our expertise in development projects and
urban planning, transportation and air quality management, to develop and assess project designs
that minimize impacts to the natural environment and community. The following is a comprehensive
list of RBF departments and services:
DEPARTMENTS AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Land Planning and Urban Conceptual Design; Master Planning; Site Planning; Hillside
Design: Grading; Landscape Architecture; Redevelopment and Infill
Land Use Planning; Illustrative Plans; Pedestrian and
Vehicular Trail Studies; Visual Analysis; Design Guidelines
and Development Standards.
Policy Planning: Specific Plans, General Plans; Community Participation
Programs; Project Management and Coordination;
Feasibility/Special Studies; Fee Programs; Community
Outreach, Entitlement to Use (including zone changes,
General Plan Amendments and annexation studies);
Redevelopment Studies; Consultant Coordination;
Governmental Agencies/Public Liaison; and Development
Support Services through Construction.
Environmental Services: Environmental Impact Reports/Statements; Expanded Initial
Studies/Negative Declarations; Mitigation Monitoring
Programs; Public Participation Programs; Natural Resource
Management; Resource Mitigation Permits; EIR and EIS
Review; Noticing; Statements of Overriding Considerations;
Findings; and Special Studies, such as Phase I Site
Assessment for hazardous materials, biological resources,
climate change, as well as noise and air quality monitoring
and modeling.
JN 10-108518 • 25 • January 30,2012
4 p�f ,
City of EI Segundo
lm+'� Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
2 ;
Transportation Planning: Master Plans of Circulation; Transportation Planning/
Engineering; Traffic Impact Studies; Traffic Control Plans;
Traffic Signal Coordination; Traffic Signal Design;
Congestion Management Programs; Street Lighting;
Signing, Striping, and Construction Detour Plans.
Media Services: Report Graphics; Presentation Graphics; View Analysis;
Illustrations; Slide Shows; Video Services; and CADD
Illustrative Plans.
Civil Engineering: Subdivision Engineering; Structural Engineering;
Engineering Design; and CADD mapping.
Mechanical/Electrical Commercial Office Buildings; Retail Shopping Center;
Engineering: Educational Facilities; Hotel/Motel; Industrial; Special
Energy Systems; Entertainment Performing Arts Centers;
and Computer Centers.
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
As a leader in the environmental consulting field, RBF offers an extensive array of services
associated with environmental compliance and documentation. RBF provides evaluation for the full
range of environmental effects for all types of projects. Our award-winning team offers
documentation in compliance with environmental laws and regulations including CEQA, NEPA, the
Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act and other applicable environmental laws.
Environmental documents prepared at RBF address the full range of environmental and technical
issues, with in-house specialists providing technical evaluation for traffic and transportation, flood
control and drainage, air quality, climate change, noise, land use, socioeconomics, utilities and
services, energy conservation, visual and aesthetic effects, relevant planning, Phase I hazardous
materials, neighborhood and construction effects, landform modification, agricultural suitability and
many other environmental issue areas. RBF draws upon the profession's leading subconsultants for
specialized biological, archeological, geotechnical and fiscaiieconomic studies to build a multi-
disciplinary team of environmental analysts. State-of-the-art computer facilities including CADD,
ARC/INFO, and specially created computer programs are utilized in obtaining the highest level of
technical completeness and efficiency.
CEQA AND NEPA DOCUMENTS
RBF has over 40 years experience in the preparation and processing of CEQA and NEPA
compliance studies. The RBF Environmental staff have provided CEQA and NEPA documentation
and environmental technical studies for a diverse range of capital improvement and development
projects, as well as regulatory/policy documents such as General Plans and zoning ordinances.
RBF environmental documents are not only legally defensible and user-friendly, but are supported by
professionals with expertise in hydrology, water quality,transportation,water/wastewater, landscape
architecture, urban design, policy planning, structural design, civil engineering, GIS, mapping, and
surveying. RBF produces environmental documents that are sensitive to both the public's concern
for resource protection and community impacts, as well as real-world issues associated with cost
JN 10-108518 • 26 • January 30, 2012
"otElg df0: .0
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
r,M
and feasibility of implementing mitigation measures. RBF's environmental compliance managers
have a broad resume of project experience in coastal, urban and rural communities and have worked
on numerous complex projects requiring technical expertise, creative solutions and development of
effective and workable mitigation. Our team has a thorough understanding of CEQA, NEPA, the
Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, National Historic Preservation Act and
other local, state and federal regulations.
AIR QUALITY
RBF utilizes air quality models that are developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
California Air Resources Board and local Air Pollution Control Districts. RBF's air quality services
include project-specific analysis of regulatory impacts, short-term construction emissions, long-term
operational emissions, and computer modeling of source-specific pollutant emissions and dispersion
analysis. Additionally, RBF has carried out mitigation programs for commercial,transportation, and
industrial projects, as well as General Plan Air Quality Elements.
GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE
RBF's climate change experts are at the forefront in developing sound scientific regulatory
assessments and strategies within the rapidly changing regulatory environment. We advise both
government and private industry on greenhouse gas (GHG) policies and methodologies and the
impact that they have on the new carbon constrained business future. To ensure a sustainable
future, there is a great need to understand and manage GHG emissions in ways that promote
economic growth. As the climate change debate and private sector market solutions evolve, RBF
continues to offer its clients unparalleled analytical, policy and business management services.
RBF has been aggressively tracking all aspects of Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32)and Senate Bill 375(SB
375)over the last several years. Our internal legislative working group meets monthlyto discuss the
implications of these GHG reduction mandates as implementation unfolds. Specific to SB 375, our
team has also conducted numerous presentations with public sector, private developer and land
broker clients about the influence these GHG reduction mandates may have on their respective
businesses.
As a result of this extensive experience, RBF has developed proprietary models for quantifying and
analyzing GHG's from a variety of direct and indirect sources including construction,vehicular traffic,
electricity consumption, water conveyance and sewage treatment. RBF's analyses recommend
innovative greenhouse gas/air pollutant reduction methods during the construction and operation of a
project, conduct advanced dispersion modeling, investigate the use of renewable energy
sources/energy efficient products and quantify the benefits of resource conservation(i.e., electricity
usage and recycling).
NOISE
RBF's acoustical services include instrument-assisted noise and vibration field surveys,commercial
and industrial stationary sources noise impact analyses, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
computer modeling of motor vehicle noise impacts for roadway and freeway projects, and rail noise
impact analysis. RBF's acoustical staff also evaluates sound insulation performance, manufacturing
and industrial noise impact mitigation, building exterior and interior sound and vibration isolation
analysis, room acoustics, and prepares General Plan Noise Elements. Services typically provided
JN 10-108518 • 27 • January 30, 2012
'4"' "":I, . . '
4290 . : -'-1
City of EI Segundo
�Y ''-''"''' Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
1
include technical analysis for NEPA or CEQA documents, or focused studies used in planning and
civil design projects.
REGULATORY AGENCY PERMITS
Our regulatory services team is trained in the most up-to-date regulations and have prepared and
processed hundreds of permit applications through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE),
California Department of Fish and Game(CDFG), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB),
and the California Coastal Commission (CCC). RBF works closely with each applicant to assure that
the jurisdictional baseline and permit applications accurately address project impacts and ultimately
complies with the state and federal review process. RBF's existing relationships with the resource
agencies allow RBF to be a liaison between the applicant and the regulatory agencies.
RBF has certified regulatory staff that is professionally trained to perform wetland delineations on
projects that need to meet regulatory requirements of the ACOE (Clean Water Act Section 404),
CDFG (California Fish and Game Code Sections 1600-1616), RWQCB (Clean Water Act Section
401, Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act), and CCC (California Coastal Act).
Years of experience preparing and processing regulatory permits through the resource agencies
have enabled RBF to identify successful strategies for satisfying agency requirements. No matter the
location, the regulatory services team has provided regulatory support to clients throughout
California, Nevada, and Arizona. Our staff has successfully delineated project sites and properties
ranging from less than 1-acre to 1,600-acres. Projects have ranged from small stream crossings to
long-term maintenance projects to large-scale mass grading activities.The regulatory services team,
coupled with our environmental and stormwater staff, allows RBF to expeditiously acquire permits
from state and federal regulatory agencies.
PUBLIC OUTREACH PROGRAMS
RBF has exceptional experience and capabilities in the strategic planning, presentation, and
technical support of public participation programs. RBF is presently implementing public outreach
programs for several city General Plans and EIR's in Southern California, facilitates scoping
meetings for CEQA/NEPA documents, and has facilitated Design Advisory Group processes for the
highly controversial such as the potential extension of State Route 710. RBF has a complete in-
house Media Services Department, which can develop virtually any form of public communication
information, including project web sites, video, PowerPoint, illustrative graphics, multi-lingual
newsletters or other materials.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENTS
RBF provides a range of Hazardous Materials Assessments to meet our clients needs for various
project types. RBF has prepared hundreds of Hazardous Materials Assessments for a variety of
projects throughout California utilizing the American Society for Testing & Materials (ASTM)
standards for commercial real estate transactions(E1527-05 and E1528-06),All Appropriate Inquiry
(AAI) as well as appropriate protocol from lending institutions and regulatory agencies. The
comprehensive capabilities and professional experience of our in-house staff allows RBF to
effectively and efficiently complete Hazardous Materials Assessments for any type of property.
JN 10-108518 • 28 • January 30,2012
4 2#29
City of EI Segundo
; I''"'"' Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
- ... .. 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center..... ..
RBF's capabilities include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments(ASTM E1527-05),Transaction
Screens (ASTM E1528-06), Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessments, Environmental Baselines
Surveys (for the United States Department of Navy)and Initial Site Assessments (for the California
Department of Transportation).
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
The RBF Planning staff provides opportunities and constraints assessments as part of preliminary
design studies for capital improvement projects and due diligence studies for development projects.
Using our GIS capabilities, RBF identifies resource and regulatory compliance issues for project
alternatives, as well as anticipated local agency and community issues. RBF provides strategic
project development services in early planning stages,which can substantially reduce or avoid cost
and schedule impacts associated with regulatory agency permitting and the public review process.
VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
RBF provides visual stimulation studies for aesthetic and visual impact evaluation. Simulations
produced by RBF range from simple photo composite/3-D massing studies to full photorealistic
depictions. RBF uses state of the art software and advanced techniques such as metric
photogrammetry and Real Time Kinematic(RTK)global positioning. Data is processed using state-
of-art computer techniques into high-quality graphics that allow the public to understand the visual
impacts of a project.
RBF provides dynamic views of proposed developments through the use of animations and
Matchmove technology (the process of combining computer animation with video). Animations
provide visual analysis while moving through or around a project on foot, in a vehicle or plane.
Additionally, RBF has the capabilities to perform viewshed analyses that may be utilized to determine
whether or not project features are visible within a one-mile-radius. The viewshed map is created
using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology and may include Digital Surface Model
(DSM) data. DSM data allows RBF to determine view blockage resulting from existing structures,
terrain, and landscaping (i.e., large trees).
RBF also prepares shade and shadow analyses by overlaying shadow diagrams on a base map that
show the building footprints of the project and the surrounding buildings.The intent of this work is to
illustrate any change in shadow patterns that would be directly attributable to the project, and to
visually demonstrate the effect of these shadows on surrounding land uses, particularly anyadjacent
residential or other sensitive uses.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
RBF has expert in-house biologists experienced in the Federal and State Endangered Species Acts,
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the California Department of Fish and Game Code, the Clean Water
Act and biological analysis under CEQA and NEPA. The RBF team's staff relationships with wildlife
agencies, regulatory agencies, federal land managers and various conservation groups allow the firm
to serve as a liaison between the applicant and these agencies / organizations. RBF's biological
team has decades of experience in the biological consulting process. Valued services provided by
RBF include conducting habitat assessments to characterize the biological features of an area,
rapidly identifying any sensitive features, suggesting a compliance strategy to resolve identified
impacts, and working with the client to make sure their planning needs are met while meeting
JN 10-108518 • 29 • January 30, 2012
City of EI Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
m
permitting and mitigation requirements. RBF staff biologists prepare general biological inventories,
endangered species/sensitive plant surveys and biological monitoring. In consultation with resource
agencies, RBF staff has extensive experience in mitigating biological resources impacts through
restoratio n/revegetation and conservation/mitigation banking.
STORM WATER QUALITY/DRAINAGE
RBF has a broad base of experience that can provide a wide variety of services to meet the
challenges associated with storm water quality. Current projects give the RBF Team a unique and
clear understanding of the requirements that the regulated community faces in complying with Court
orders, fulfilling National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit obligations and
other related storm water activities. In addition to this experience, several members of the Team are
participants in the California Storm Water Quality Association.
RBF's Storm Water Quality capabilities include the identification of constituents of concern, research
relative to Best Management Practices (BMP) effectiveness, BMP siting, design, construction,
construction management and operation, maintenance and monitoring. Furthermore, RBF has
completed studies relative to BMP effectiveness and cost including prototype studies relative to
operation and maintenance cost and capital costs evaluation for new construction and retrofit
construction. RBF has completed designs for the following types of conventional structural controls:
• Extended Detention
• Wet Pond / Constructed Wetlands
• Infiltration (Basin and Trench)
• Biofiltration (Swale and Strip)
• Sand Filters (Full and Partial Sedimentation)
• Manufactured BMPs
Key stormwater/water quality services provided by RBF include:
• Municipal Stormwater Program Development
• NPDES Compliance
BMP Research and Annlicatinn
• BMP Retrofit Studies
• Water Quality Monitoring
• Stormwater Management Related Training
MITIGATION MONITORING
RBF develops Mitigation Monitoring Programs for CEQA documents, and provides assistance to
public and private sector clients in interpreting and implementing the required programs. RBF
services include, through a combination of our Construction Management and Planning staff, field
monitoring for air quality, dust, traffic control, and resource mitigation. RBF received an award from
the Association of Environmental Professionals for our Mission Bay Mitigation Monitoring Program
web site, allowing interactive viewing and updating of mitigation compliance by agency staff, the
developer and the public.
JN 10-108518 • 30 • January 30, 2012
2
Exhibit C
Resumes
4290 °
M City of EI SegunN
""r " Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
� - 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
V1. PROJECT TEAM
The following are brief background descriptions for the key professionals who would be responsible
for preparing the environmental documentation.The percentage of hours of each staff member and
individual tasks are included in the Fee Summary. The project organization chart is as follows:
f
ERIC=
Gd ern L.jf..i&,AICP
Ct7C AE e,�adory-,:!,tP4KT
,x n 1,
IiiB, rtl,rurvn pg,VB,..I„ ,,ru
JN 10-108518 • 43 • January 30, 2012
R c4 f E"�sQ a d ' ,
tu) Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
,gill
* ,
GLENN LAJOIE,AICP N PROJECT MANAGER
Registration/Certification: Education:
1994,American Institute of Certified B.A., 1985, Geography/Urban Studies, California State University,
Planners,087288 Long Beach
Years Experience:25 M.P.A., 1992, Public Policy and Administration, California State
University, Long Beach
Telephone Number: 949-855-3663
Professional Affiliations:
Full Member,American Planning Association
Full Member,Association of Environmental Professionals
Member, Orange County American Planning Association Board of
Directors, 1992-1997
President,Orange County American Planning Association, 1994-1996
Lecturer,California State University„Long Beach
Mr. Lajoie's primary responsibilities include oversight of daily operations, management of projects, staff
mentoring and instruction,scheduling,and business development. With many years of practical experience,
Mr. Lajoie is a recognized leader in CEQA and NEPA studies (EIR's, EIS's, Negative Declarations,
Environmental Assessments), as well as other policy planning documents, including General Plans, Area
Plans, Specific Plans,and due diligence studies. Projects have ranged from private entitlement applications
related to residential and commercial projects as well as a variety of water, wastewater, highway, and
redevelopment projects throughout California. Project responsibilities include analysis,technical review and
management of environmental and policy planning documentation for compliance with CEQA/NEPA,
implementation of public participation programs,and assistance to various public and private sector clients in
meeting the requirements of local, State, and Federal agencies.
Relevant Experience:
■ Arbor Gardens Housing Project Environmental Assessment(Lancaster,CA)
■ Beverly Hills Gardens and Montage Hotel Mixed Use Project EIR(Beverly Hills,CA)
■ Boeing Specific Plan Program EIR(Seal Beach,CA)
■ Cambria Suites Hotel Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration(EI Segundo,CA)
• Crestridge Senior Villas and Palos Verdes Peninsula Senior Center EIR(Rancho Palos Verdes,CA)
■ Garvey Villas Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration(Monterey Park:CA)
■ El Segundo Media Center(EI Segundo,CA)
■ EI Segundo Power Redevelopment Project(00-AFC-14)(EI Segundo,CA)
■ Fair, Isaac Office Park EIR(San Rafael,CA)
• Hampton Inn&Suites Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration(EI Segundo,CA)
■ Hotel Del Coronado Master Plan EIR(Coronado,CA)
■ Long Point Resort EIR(Rancho Palos Verdes,CA)
■ Los Alamitos Medical Center Specific Plan EIR(Los Alamitos,CA)
• Marymount College Facilities Expansion EIR(Rancho Palos Verdes,CA)
■ Nash Street Data Center Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration(EI Segundo,CA)
■ North Downtown Lancaster Neighborhood Revitalization/Transit Village Plan EIR/EA(Lancaster,CA)
■ North Village Mammoth Specific Plan Program EIR(Mammoth Lakes,CA)
■ Pacific Garden Senior Housing Group Project(Santa Monica,CA)
■ Seal Beach Townhomes Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (Seal Beach,CA)
■ Shoreline Gateway EIR(Long Beach,CA)
■ South Pasadena Downtown Revitalization Project EIR(South Pasadena,CA)
■ The Clearwater Specific Plan EIR(Mammoth Lakes,CA)
JN 10-108518 • 44 9 January 30, 2012
s
9
P y {{
�I• d... Iiryw
rl City of El Segun o
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
- . . ...
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping ingCen
tor
COLLETTE MORSE, AICP I CEQA ADVISOR
Registration/Certification: Education:
1996,American Institute of Certified B.A., 1984, Geography/Ecosystems, U.C.L.A,
Planners, 12382
Professional Affiliations:
Years Experience: 25 Commissioner,American Institute of Certified Planners(AICP)for
Region VI,2006—2010
Past President, California Chapter,American Planning Association,
2005
President,California Chapter,American Planning Association,2003 to
2004
Ms. Morse's primary responsibilities at RBF include the preparation of CEQA and NEPA documents
(Environmental Impact Reports, Negative Declarations, Initial Studies,Environmental Assessments),as well
as other policy planning documents, including General Plans and Specific Plans. She has prepared
environmental documents for policy plans, mixed-use developments,high-rise office,commercial,residential,
industrial,schools(elementary,high school,and colleges/universities),hospitals,and redevelopment projects
for both public and private sector clients throughout California. Ms. Morse's responsibilities include analysis,
technical review and management of environmental documents for CEQA compliance,staff supportfor public
agencies,and assistance to private sector clients in meeting governmental agency requirements.Ms.Morse is
also responsible for updating and implementing RBF's in-house QA/QC program.
Relevant Experience:
■ 231-265 North Beverly Drive(William Morris Agency)Project EIR(Beverly Hills,CA)
■ Beverly Hills Gardens and Montage Hotel Mixed Use Project EIR(Beverly Hills,CA)
■ Carson General Plan Update and EIR(Carson,CA)
■ Cerritos General Plan Update and EIR(Cerritos,CA)
■ Costa Mesa General Plan Update and EIR(Costa Mesa,CA)
■ Cypress General Plan Update and EIR(Cypress,CA)
■ Duarte General Plan EIR(Duarte,CA)
• Fullerton General Plan Update EIR(Fullerton,CA)
■ Garden Grove General Plan Update and EIR(Garden Grove,CA)
■ Glendora General Plan Update(Glendora,CA)
■ Goleta General Plan Existing Conditions and Community Outreach(Goleta,CA)
■ Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital Master Plan EIR(Santa Clarita,CA)
■ Hi Hope Ranch MND(Oceanside,CA)
■ Historic Town Center EIR(San Juan Capistrano,CA)
• Los Alamitos Medical Center Specific Plan EIR(Los Alamitos,CA)
■ Mariners Mile Gateway MND(Newport Beach,CA)
• Pacific Coast Highway Corridor Affordable Housing Projects EIR(Signal Hill,CA)
■ Pier Bowl Master Plan Program EIR(San Clemente,CA)
■ Prescott Valley 2020 General Plan(Prescott Valley,AZ)
■ Rancho Del Oro Village XII Program EIR(Oceanside,CA)
■ Rush Creek Estates EIR(Marin County,CA)
■ South Gate General Plan EIR(South Gate,CA)
■ St.Cloud Residential MND(Oceanside,CA)
■ Stanton General Plan EIR(Stanton,CA)
■ Temecula General Plan EIR(Temecula,CA)
JN 10-108518 • 45 • January 30, 2012
IVw! �i' ww�^ur
City of EI Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
/!I r 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
K
EDWARD TORRES, INCE, REA I TECHNICAL SPECIALIST
Reg istration/Certi � ��a�, . �n � �w,� W � �m� m� mmmm�.��., MM.Mmmd,�. ...... .............._..;���,. ,,,.... . ,��....mmm
fication• Education:
2003, Institute of Noise Control Engineers B.A.,2000, Environmental Analysis and Design, University of
California, Irvine
2009, Registered Environmental Assessor, B.S.,2000, Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Irvine
30154 M.S.,2005, Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California
Years Experience: 12 Professional Affiliations:
American Planning Association
Air&Waste Management Association
Acoustical Society of America
Institute of Noise Control Engineering
American Institute of Physics
Mr. Torres serves as the Director of Technical Studies, with a specialty in Acoustics, Air Quality, Climate
Change, and Visual Impact Assessments. Mr. Torres leads RBF's efforts to be at the forefront of Global
Climate Change studies. Mr.Torres has prepared numerous analyses that are consistent with climate change
legislation such as Assembly Bill 32,Senate Bill 97,Executive Order S-3-05,and Senate Bill 375. In addition
to analyzing climate change impacts, Mr. Torres has led the development of numerous greenhouse gas
inventory models which calculate greenhouse gas emissions from such sources as vehicular traffic,stationary
sources, electricity consumption, water consumption,wastewater treatment, and construction processes.
Mr.Torres has also been selected bythe California Energy Commission (CEC)to co-lead a set of technical
working groups to develop energy and GHG assessment protocols for single buildings, land use and
infrastructure projects. The program was developed through a Public Interest Energy Research(PIER)grant
to facilitating a series of technical working groups that bring together diverse sets of subject matter experts,
emphasizing individuals with combinations of"front line"experience and vision for the implications for public
policy,regulation,and market transformation.The following is a representative sample of projects for which
Mr.Torres has prepared environmental and technical analyses.
Relevant Experience:
■ Beverly Hills Gardens and Montage Hotel Mixed Use Project EIR(Beverly Hills,CA)
■ Boeing Specific Plan Program EIR(Seal Beach,CA)
■ Crestridge Senior Villas and Palos Verdes Peninsula Seninr Canter FIR(Rancho Palos Verdes,CA)
■ Dana Point Harbor Revitalization EIR(Dana Point,CA)
■ EI Segundo Power Redevelopment Project(00-AFC-14)
■ Fullerton Climate Action Plan(Fullerton,CA)
■ Garvey Villas Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Monterey Park,CA)
• Hampton Inn&Suites Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration(EI Segundo,CA)
■ Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan Program EIR(Upland,CA)
■ Hotel del Coronado Specific Plan Program EIR(Coronado,CA)
■ Los Alamitos Medical Center Specific Plan EIR(Los Alamitos,CA)
■ Mammoth Clearwater Specific Plan EIR(Mammoth Lakes,CA)
■ Marymount College Facilities Expansion EIR(Rancho Palos Verdes,CA)
■ Murrieta Climate Action Plan(Murrieta,CA)
■ Nash Street Data Center Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
■ Seal Beach Townhomes Project MND(Seal Beach,CA)
■ Shoreline Gateway EIR(Long Beach,CA)
JN 10-108518 • 46 9 January 30, 2012
42�"' ' . i gr A l
City of EI Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
RITA GARCIA I SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST
Years Experience:21 Education:
B.S., 1988, Urban and Regional Planning, California State Polytechnic
University,Pomona
Professional Affiliations:
American Planning Association
Association of Environmental Professionals
Ms. Garcia is involved in the preparation, daily monitoring,and coordination of CEQA documents,ensuring
their timely completion reflective of the highest standard of professional care. With over 20 years in the
environmental field, Ms. Garcia has extensive experience with projects involving sensitive planning and
environmental issues including land use and relevant planning, aesthetics/visual character, and
traffic/circulation. She has had significant experience with environmental analyses of numerous large-scale
mixed-use projects involving institutional,commercial,residential,and public infrastructure uses. Ms.Garcia's
professional experience consists of involvement with various EIRs for large-scale, mixed-use projects. More
specifically, her experience as Project Manager for the Marymount College Facilities Expansion Project EIR,
Long Point Resort EIR, and North Lake Area and South Lake Area Projects, involved critical land use
compatibility and relevant planning issues, and in depth analyses of consistency with city policies and code
standards for infill developments in urban settings. These Projects,along with the Clearwater Specific Plan
EIR and Beverly Hills Gardens and Montage Hotel Project EIR required detailed traffic, circulation,parking,
and visual character analyses for short-and long-term conditions.
Relevant Experience:
■ Beverly Hills Gardens and Montage Hotel Mixed Use Project EIR(Beverly Hills,CA)
■ Boeing Specific Plan Program EIR(Seal Beach,CA)
■ Buena Park General Plan Update/Program EIR(Buena Park,CA)
Cambria Community Services District Water Master Plan EIR(Cambria Community Services District)
■ Crestridge Senior Housing EIR(Rancho Palos Verdes,CA)
• Downtown and Central Long Beach Redevelopment Plans Master EIR(Long Beach,CA)
■ East Campus Infrastructure Improvements Phase 2 IS/MND(University of California,Riverside)
■ Edison Mission Energy Solar Photovoltaic Due Diligence Studies
■ Fullerton General Plan Update/Program EIR(Fullerton,CA)
■ Hawaiian Gardens General Plan Update EIR(Hawaiian Gardens,CA)
■ Holiday Haus Project IS/MND(Mammoth Lakes,CA)
■ Hotel del Coronado Master Plan Program EIR(Coronado,CA)
■ Long Point Resort EIR(Rancho Palos Verdes,CA)
■ Marymount College Facilities Expansion EIR(Rancho Palos Verdes,CA)
■ Moon Camp TT#16136 EIR(Big Bear Lakes,CA)
■ North Downtown Lancaster Neighborhood Revitalization/Transit Village Plan and EIR/EA(Lancaster,CA)
■ North Village Mammoth Specific Plan Program EIR(Mammoth Lakes,CA)
■ Oasis Road Specific Plan Master EIR(Redding,CA)
■ Old Town Yucca Valley Specific Plan Program EIR(Yucca Valley,CA)
■ Pacific Gateway Plaza Project MND(Seal Beach,CA)
■ Ritz Carlton Specific Plan EIR(Rancho Palos Verdes,CA)
■ Rivers End Staging Area&San Gabriel Bikeway Enhancement Plan MND(Seal Beach,CA)
■ Shoreline Gateway EIR(Long Beach,CA)
■ South Pasadena Downtown Revitalization EIR(South Pasadena,CA)
■ Sierra Meadows Estates EIR(Madera County,CA)
JN 10-108518 • 47 • January 30, 2012
City of IAe ntlo�l Itl• Jl
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
:
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
KRISTEN BOGUE, CEI ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST
Registration/Certification:
' Education:
2007, Certified Environmental Inspector, B.A.,2005, Environmental Analysis and Design, University of
9924 California, Irvine
Years Experience: 6 Professional Affiliations:
Association of Environmental Professionals
Ms. Bogue assists in the preparation of environmental and planning studies for public and private sector
clients, with a focus on due diligence planning activities. Ms. Bogue specializes in the preparation of
hazardous materials studies and visual analysis services.
Ms. Bogue has prepared numerous hazardous materials related studies. Ms. Bogue prepares Phase I
Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), Initial Site Assessments (ISAs) for the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans), Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessments pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), and Environmental Baseline Surveys(EBSs)for the Department of the
Navy. The scopes of the ESAs and ISAs follow guidance provided in American Societyfor Testing Materials
(ASTM) Standard Practice E 1527-05. The ASTM 1527-05 document outlines a procedure for completing
ESAs that includes a review of records (current and historic), site reconnaissance, and interviews. Other
hazardous materials related studies follow the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
pertaining to hazardous materials.
Additionally,Ms.Bogue is involved with Visual Impact Assessments in conformance with appropriate agency
standards, including the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) "Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) for
Highway Projects,"United States Bureau of Land Management guidelines,and California Energy Commission
(CEC)guidelines. Ms.Bogue assists in the preparation of documents with respect to CEQA and the National
Environmental Policy Act(NEPA). Visual Services include the preparation of photosimulations, shade and
shadow studies, as well as viewshed mapping.
Relevant Experience:
• Atkinson Lane Specific Plan/Master Plan(Santa Cruz County,CA)
• Citywide Capital Improvement Project MND(Seal Beach,CA)
■ Clearwater Specific Plan EIR(Mammoth Lakes,CA)
■ Crossroads Plaza Commercial Center Initial Study and EIR(Bakersfield,CA)
■ Dana Point Harbor Revitalization EIR(Dana Point,CA)
■ Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension(Corona,CA)
• Hercules Town Center Project EIR(Hercules,CA)
■ Holiday Haus Project MND(Mammoth Lakes,CA)
■ The Lakes Project EIR(Ontario,CA)
■ Lincoln Acres Library and Community Center Project(Cypress,CA)
■ Los Gatos General Plan Update(Los Gatos,CA)
■ Main Street Widening Project MND(Orange,CA)
• Naples Seawall Interim and Long Range Repair IS/MND(Long Beach,CA)
■ Osborne Hill Project EIR(Nevada County,CA)
■ Ponto Beachfront Vision Plan Due Diligence(Carlsbad,CA)
■ The Sherwin Project EIR(Mammoth Lakes,CA)
■ Salt Creek Heights Subdivision Initial Study and EIR(Redding,CA)
■ Seal Beach Townhomes Project MND(Seal Beach,CA)
JN 10-108518 • 48 • January 30,2012
rM
a
City of EI Segunao'
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
'« 600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
BOB MATSON TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
m , a ��, �•�
Years Experience:25 Education:•�,,�a,Mww�w��x: ;*,;;mum; m;;-,u�... -m. , - ,TMu; ;�wvww;-nw,. � .m ;.„.
B.S., 1984, Engineering Technology,California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
Certificate, 1988, Land Use and Development Planning, University of
California, Irvine
Professional Affiliations:
Member, Institute of Transportation Engineers
Mr.Matson has manyyears of diverse traffic and transportation experience in preparing a wide range of traffic
studies and transportation planning analyses. He is responsible for managing traffic and transportation studies
for planning,environmental and engineering projects. His experience encompasses serving as the Manager
of Transportation for the Irvine Company for major land use planning,entitlements for generating traffic impact
analyses for Caltrans on an on call basis. Mr.Matson and his staff generate a variety of traffic/transportation
studies to analyze and document projects at various stages of development, such as conceptual planning,
preliminary engineering, agency general plan/zoning modifications, environmental documentation,
project/infrastructure phasing,site plans,tract maps,final engineering,construction traffic management plans,
and parking studies. Mr.Matson received his B.S. in Engineering from California State Polytechnic University,
Pomona and Social Ecology Development and Land Use Planning Certification from the University of
California, Irvine, along with numerous Institute of Transportation Studies certifications.
Relevant Experience:
■ Beverly Hills Gardens and Montage Hotel Mixed Use Project EIR
■ Buena Vista Casino Project Traffic Analysis Support to Agency Staff
■ Casino Morongo Roundabout Traffic Visual Simulations
■ Downtown Laguna Beach Traffic Circulation and Parking Management Analysis
■ Downtown Lancaster Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis
■ Downtown and Central Long Beach Redevelopment Plans Master EIR
■ Downtown Sierra Madre Specific Plan and Program EIR Project Traffic and Parking Impact Analysis
■ Hotel Del Coronado Master Plan EIR
■ Long Point Resort EIR
■ Los Alamitos Medical Center Traffic Impact Analysis
■ Marblehead Coastal EIR
■ Marymount College Facilities Expansion EIR
• North Downtown Lancaster Neighborhood Revitalization/Transit Village Plan EIR/EA
■ Oasis Road Specific Plan Master EIR
■ Old Town Yucca Valley Specific Plan Program EIR
■ Pacific Trade Center EIR
■ Perris Downtown Specific Plan Traffic and Parking Analysis
■ Plymouth Casino Project Traffic Analysis Support to Agency Staff
■ San Fernando Downtown Parking Lots Project Traffic and Parking Impact Analysis
■ Seal Beach Townhomes Project MND
■ South Pasadena Downtown Revitalization Project Traffic and Parking Impact Analysis
■ Temple Palms Business Park Traffic Impact Analysis
■ Torrance Citywide Comprehensive Traffic Study
JN 10-108518 • 49 • January 30, 2012
p 9
4 �M
City of EI Segundo
Updated Proposal for Environmental Compliance Documentation for
600-630 North Sepulveda Queen Esther Square Shopping Center
PAUL MARTIN, P.E., T.E. , PTOEI TRANSPORTATION SPECIALIST
Registration/Certification. Education:
2003, Civil Engineer, CA,65868 B.S., 1999, Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine
2005,Traffic Engineer, CA, 2315
2005, Professional Traffic Operations Professional Affiliations:
Engineer, US, 1651 Urban Land Institute Member
2005,Civil Engineer,WY, 10623 Congress for New Urbanism
2007,Civil Engineer, HI, 12701
2008, Civil Engineer, NV, 19817
2009,Civil Engineer,AZ,49276
Years Experience: 11
Telephone Number: 949-855-7005
E-mail: pmartiii@rbf.com
Paul Martin has extensive experience in transportation planning,traffic engineering,and parking analysis. He
is practiced at working with land use planning professionals to develop and refine proposed land use plans
and site plans to increase mobilityfor multiple users(motorists,transit riders,pedestrians,bicyclists,etc.)of an
integrated transportation circulation system. Paul is focused on customizing solutions for public and private
sector clients to minimize transportation impacts on global climate change in response to evolving political
environments, public sentiment, and government legislation.
He is proficient at identification of feasible traffic and parking mitigation measures for CEQA document
defensibility. In addition to physical solutions to address forecast deficiencies, Paul derives non-physical
solutions to minimize impacts including traffic demand management, parking reduction strategies and parking
management programs.
Based on his traffic engineering experience, Paul is proficient at site access refinements to improve internal
circulation and minimize pedestrian/vehicle conflicts. Paul has prepared multiple traffic flow visual simulations
combining measured vehicular and pedestrian volumes with aerial imagery to show existing and future traffic
circulation conditions. Simulations have shown proposed roadway connections,placement of traffic signals at
varying access points, as well as intersection control bytraffic signal or roundabout for public discussion and
understanding.
Relevant Experience:
■ Almond Tree Village Mixed-Use Project Traffic Impact Analysis
■ Bunker Hill Towers Apartments Area Transit Survey and Parking Analysis
■ Downtown Specific Plan Traffic and Parking Analysis
■ Empire Buena Vista Apartment Traffic Impact Analysis
■ Engineering Access Roundabout Conceptual Plans
■ Garvey Villas Traffic Impact Analysis
■ Interstate 5/Jamboree Road Interchange Improvement
■ Laguna Beach Downtown Traffic Impact Analysis
■ Laguna Beach Traffic Circulation and Parking Management Analysis
■ Marblehead Coastal Project Traffic Analysis
■ McCanna Hills Specific Plan 246 Amendment Traffic Impact Analysis
■ Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA)Bus Rapid Transit(BRT),Program Management-Planning Services
■ University High School Synchro/SimTraffic Simulations
JN 10-108518 • 50 • January 30,2012