Loading...
CONTRACT 5527 Professional Services Agreement CLOSED Agreement No. 5527 Agreement No. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. �i This AGREEMENT is entered into this � I""day of May, 2018, by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a general law city and municipal corporation ("CITY") and RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC., a California corporation ("CONSULTANT"). 1. CONSIDERATION. A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, contained in the proposal attached as Exhibit"A", which is incorporated herein; B. As additional consideration,CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement; C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a sum not to exceed $80,808.00 (15% is included for possible contingencies, if needed and approved) for CONSULTANT's services. CITY may modify this amount as set forth below. Unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement, CITY will pay this sum as specified in the attached Exhibit"A". 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. A. CONSULTANT will perform services listed in the attached Exhibit"A". B. CONSULTANT will, using a standard of care equal to, or greater than, the degree of skill and diligence ordinarily used by reputable professionals, with a level of experience and training similar to CONSULTANT, performing under circumstances similar to those required by this Agreement, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space and facilities, and all tests, testing and analyses, calculation, and all other means whatsoever, except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY as specified in Exhibit"A", Scope of Services,necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement. 3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit a detailed invoice to CITY which lists the hours worked and hourly rates for each personnel category and reimbursable costs (all as set forth in Exhibit"B")the tasks performed, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period, the cumulative percentage completed for each task, the total cost of that work during the preceding billing month and a cumulative cash flow curve showing projected and actual expenditures versus time to date. Page 1 of 11 Agreement No. 5527 4. POLITICAL REFORM ACT. CONSULTANT agrees that it will be considered a public official subject to the Political Reform Act of 1974 for purposes of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees and warrants that it has no financial interests which may be materially affected by the project for which the Initial Study, as specified in the SERVICES, is being prepared. Such financial interests may include, without limitation, interests in business entities, real property,or sources of income exceeding$500 received within the past year. CONSULTANT further warrants that, before executing this Agreement, it reviewed the Political Reform Act of 1974 and the Fair Political Practices Commission regulations, including, without limitation, Chapter 7 of Title 2 of the California Administrative Code, Section 18700, et seq., in order to determine whether any conflict of interest would require CONSULTANT to refrain from performing the SERVICES or in any way attempting to use its official position to influence the governmental decisions underlying the subject environmental clearances. 5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. A. By executing this Agreement,CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has i, Thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; ii. Carefully considered how the services should be performed; and iii. Understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. B. If services involve work upon any site, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, before commencing the services hereunder. Should CONSULTANT discover any latent or unknown conditions that may materially affect the performance of the services, CONSULTANT will immediately inform CITY of such fact and will not proceed except at CONSULTANT's own risk until written instructions are received from CITY. C. Although CITY has a duty to the public to independently review any environmental document, including, without limitation a negative declaration or draft EIR, prepared by CONSULTANT,that duty to the public, or the breach thereof,will not relieve CONSULTANT of its duties under this Section or any representation provided by CONSULTANT in this Agreement. 6. KEY PERSONNEL. A. CONSULTANT's key personnel assigned to perform work under this Agreement and their level of responsibility are identified in the proposal attached to this Agreement in Exhibit"A". B. The resume of each of the individuals are attached to this Agreement, collectively, in Exhibit"A". Page 2 of 12 Agreement No. 5527 C. In the event CITY objects to the continued involvement with this Agreement by any of the persons listed in this Section, or any other person selected by CONSULTANT to perform services under this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT agrees that it will replace such persons with individuals that are agreed to by CITY. 7. TERM. The term of this Agreement will be from May L41, 018, to May31',T2019. Unless otherwise determined by written amendment between the parties,this Agreement will terminate in the following instances: A. Completion of the work specified in Exhibit"A"; B. Termination as stated in Section 15. 8. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. CONSULTANT will not perform any work under this Agreement until: A. CONSULTANT furnishes proof of insurance as required by this Agreement; and B. CITY gives CONSULTANT a written Notice to Proceed. C. Should CONSULTANT begin work on any phase in advance of receiving written authorization to proceed, any such professional services are at CONSULTANT's own risk. 9. TIME EXTENSIONS. Should CONSULTANT be delayed by causes beyond CONSULTANT's control, CITY may grant a time extension for the completion of the contracted services. If delay occurs, CONSULTANT must notify CITY within forty-eight hours (48 hours), in writing, of the cause and the extent of the delay and how such delay interferes with the Agreement's schedule. CITY may, but is not required to, extend the completion time, when appropriate, for the completion of the contracted services. 10. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties. 11. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 12. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT, at its sole expense, will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. 13. PROJECT COORDINATION AND SUPERVISION. A. Joseph Power, Vice President/Principal will be responsible for negotiations and contractual matters with CITY's Project Manager. Page 3 of 12 Agreement No. 5527 K Susanne Huerta, Senior Environmental Planner will be assigned as Project Manager and will be responsible for job performance and coordination with CITY's Project Manager. C. Gregg McClain, Planning Manager will be assigned as CITY's Project Manager and will be personally in charge of and personally supervise or perform the technical execution of the Project on a day-to-day basis on behalf of CITY and will maintain direct communication with CONSULTANT's Project Manager. 14. WAIVER. CITY's review or acceptance of, or payment for, work product prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement will not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights CITY may have under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising from CONSULTANT's performance. A waiver by CITY of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement will not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement, whether of the same or different character. 15. TERMINATION. A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination will be in writing. B, CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement at any time with CITY's mutual consent. Notice will be in writing at least thirty (30) days before the effective termination date. C. Should termination occur, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT will, at CITY's option, become CITY's property, and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work rendered in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement up to the effective date of notice of termination, not to exceed the total costs under Section 1(C). D. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated. E. By executing this document, CONSULTANT waives any and all claims for damages that might otherwise arise from CITY's termination under this Section. 16. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement are CITY's property. CONSULTANT may retain copies of said documents and materials as desired, but will deliver all original materials to CITY upon CITY's written notice. CITY agrees that use of CONSULTANT's completed work product,for purposes other than identified in this Agreement,or use of incomplete work product, is at CITY's own risk. Page 4 of 12 Agreement No. 5527 17. PUBLICATION OF DOCUMENTS. Except as necessary for performance of service under this Agreement, no copies, sketches, or graphs of materials, including graphic art work, prepared pursuant to this Agreement,will be released by CONSULTANT to any other person or city without CITY's prior written approval. All press releases, including graphic display information to be published in newspapers or magazines, will be approved and distributed solely by CITY, unless otherwise provided by written agreement between the parties. 18. INDEMNIFICATION. A. CONSULTANT agrees to the following: i. Indemnification for Professional Services. CONSULTANT will save harmless and indemnify, including, without limitation, CITY's defense costs (including reasonable attorney's fees), from and against any and all suits, actions, or claims, of any character whatever, brought for, or on account of, any injuries or damages sustained by any person or property resulting or arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission by CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT's officers, agents, employees,or representatives,in the performance of this Agreement,except for such loss or damage arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful misconduct. ii. Indemnification for other Damages. CONSULTANT indemnifies and holds CITY harmless from and against any claim, action, damages, costs (including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees), injuries, or liability, arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, except for such loss or damage arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful misconduct. Should CITY be named in any suit, or should any claim be brought against it by suit or otherwise, whether the same be groundless or not, arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, CONSULTANT will defend CITY (at CITY's request and with counsel satisfactory to CITY) and will indemnify CITY for any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise. iii. Exclusion for CEQA Actions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CONSULTANT need not indemnify, defend, or hold CITY harmless in CEQA actions initiated pursuant to Public Resources Code §§ 21167 and 21168 where CONSULTANT's work may form the basis of a lawsuit. However, should CONSULTANT's work, as contemplated by this Agreement, contain errors or omissions that results in an adverse ruling against CITY, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify and hold CITY harmless to the extent provided for in Section 18(A)(i). B. For purposes of this section "CITY" includes CITY's officers, officials and employees, C. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions will survive termination of this Agreement. Page 5 of 12 Agreement No. 5527 D. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONSULTANT as required by Section 22, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification. 19. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT's professional services. CONSULTANT's attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY's written approval are prohibited and will be null and void. 20. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only. 21. AUDIT OF RECORDS. A, CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee,has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement. B. Upon inspection, CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements of this Section. CONSULTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective measures will result in immediate termination of this Agreement. C. CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement. 22. INSURANCE. A. Before commencing performance under this Agreement, and at all other times this Agreement is effective, CONSULTANT must procure and maintain the following Page 6 of 12 Agreement No. 5527 types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum, with the limits set forth below: IT'yze,01 It)SLUIVICe I..,iinits tcombilled sin lel Commercial general liability: $1,000,000 Professional Liability $1,000,000 Business automobile liability $1,000,000 Workers compensation Statutory requirement. B. Commercial general liability insurance will meet or exceed the requirements of ISO-CGL Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. The amount of insurance set forth above will be a combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage for the policy coverage. Commercial General Liability policy will be endorsed to name City, its officials, and employees as "additional insureds" under said insurance coverage and to state that such insurance will be deemed "primary" such that any other insurance that may be carried by City will be excess thereto. Such endorsement must be reflected on ISO Form No. CG 20 10 11 85 or 88. Such insurance will be on an "occurrence," not a "claims made," basis and will not be cancelable or subject to reduction except upon thirty(30)days prior written notice to City. C. Automobile coverage will be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01 06 92, including symbol 1 (Any Auto) or an acceptable equivalent. D. Professional liability coverage will be on an"occurrence basis" if such coverage is available, or on a"claims made"basis if not available. When coverage is provided on a"claims made basis," CONSULTANT will continue to maintain the insurance in effect for a period of three(3)years after this Agreement expires or is terminated ("extended insurance"). Such extended insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by City arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect. E. CONSULTANT will furnish to City duly authenticated Certificates of Insurance evidencing maintenance of the insurance required under this Agreement, endorsements as required herein, and such other evidence of insurance or copies of policies as may be reasonably required by City from time to time. Insurance must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best Company Rating equivalent to at least a Rating of"A:VII." F. Should CONSULTANT, for any reason, fail to obtain and maintain the insurance required by this Agreement, City may terminate. 23. USE OF CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY's prior written approval to use any consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must approve of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation. Page 7 of 12 Agreement No. 5527 24. INCIDENTAL TASKS. CONSULTANT will meet with CITY monthly to provide the status on the project, which will include a schedule update and a short narrative description of progress during the past month for each major task, a description of the work remaining and a description of the work to be done before the next schedule update. 25. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows: CITY: CONSULTANT: El Segundo Planning& Building Safety Dept. Rincon Consultants, Inc. 350 Main Street 250 E. 1St Street, Suite 301 El Segundo, CA 90245-3813 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attention: Gregg McClain, Planning Manager Attention: Susanne Huerta Phone: (310) 524-2393 Phone: (213) 788-4842 ext. 104 Fax: (310) 322-4167 Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances,notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. 26. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement..Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability. 27. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES.This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT's or CITY's obligations under this Agreement. 28. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County or in the Federal District Court in the District of California in which Los Angeles County is located. 29. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Exhibits, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. There are three (3) Exhibits to this Agreement. This Agreement will bind and inure to the benefit of the parties to this Agreement and any subsequent successors and assigns. Page 8 of 12 Agreement No. 5527 30, CONSISTENCY. In interpreting this Agreement and resolving any ambiguities, the main body of this Agreement takes precedence over the attached Exhibit; this Agreement supersedes any conflicting provisions. 31. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly,this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party. 32. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable,then such portion will be deemed modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and, as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect. 33. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION.The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment signed by both parties. CITY's city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY. 34. ACCEPTANCE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Agreement, agreements ancillary to this Agreement, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by electronic mail in "portable document format" (i.e., pdf) form, or by facsimile transmission. Such signature will be deemed to be and treated in all respects as an original signature. 35. COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS. The parties agree that all of the provisions hereof will be construed as both covenants and conditions,the same as if the words importing such covenants and conditions had been used in each separate paragraph. 36. CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and will not affect the interpretation of this Agreement. 37. FORCE MAJE URE. In no event shall either CONSULTANT or the CITY have any claim or right against the other for any failure of performance where such failure of performance is caused by or is the result of causes beyond the reasonable control of the other party due to any occurrence commonly known as a "force majeure," including, but not limited to: acts of God; fire, flood, or other natural catastrophe; acts of any governmental body, labor dispute or shortage; national emergency; insurrection; riot; or war. 38. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement using a standard of care equal to, or greater than,the degree of skill and diligence ordinarily used by reputable professionals,with a level of experience and training similar to CONSULTANT,performing under circumstances similar to those required by this Agreement. CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is Page 9 of 12 Agreement No. 5527 capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency. [Signatures on next page] Page 10 of 12 Agreement No. 5527 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. a gei -al [a city a Calikynia Corporatj( 11 (ire .,'%Irp , -er, e .11 PoNver. 11 4e �' (ire 7 Ci Manager V ,'jJ e President/Principal 'i, �Y) ATTEST, Taxpayer ID No. 77-0390093 �C' 41 V c I City (Ik,t"i'k -.140 .............. APPRO V AS '1`0 FORM: MT�--D.R-ens;'1—eyj, ' City Attorney S Page 11 of 12 Agreement No. 5527 EXHIBIT PROPOSAL TITLED: "ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND TECHNICAL STUDIES FORA ZONING CODE AMENDMENT AND HOTEL PROJECT" DATED: APRIL 26, 2618 Page 12 of 12 Agreement No. 5527 , , 2IL 1111111 uuupui ,�, i' i �iiiulllll� � �� Ilii I � h ��� IIII 1111111 IIIA " lu��fl�iu° IIIIIIIIIIII� „ � ' WYr„ .,171 1917-2017 Proposal Environmental Review and Technical Studies for a Zoning Code Amendment and Hotel Project April 26, 2018 Submitted to: Eduardo Schonborn, AICP Principal Planner City of EI Segundo 350 Main Street EI Segundo, California 90245 i Agreement No. 5527 uIW,� VIII mw :ui� uillu:.muw. „ Ilrie Ili l i I I�VLL.III ..a ui u u i I W April 26, 2018 Project Number 18-05726 Eduardo Schonborn,AICP Principal Planner City of EI Segundo 350 Main Street EI Segundo, California,90245 Via email: 22,"ul� dna 2 Subject: Proposal to Conduct Environmental Review and Technical Studies for a Zoning Code Amendment and Hotel Project Dear Mr. Schonborn: Rincon Consultants, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of EI Segundo to conduct environmental review and associated technical studies for a zoning code amendment and a new boutique hotel, referred to as the Segundo House Hotel project.We believe that our combination of experience on similar projects and previous work in EI Segundo make us uniquely qualified to assist the City with this assignment. We are very enthusiastic about the opportunity to work with the City and have assembled a team of highly skilled environmental science and planning professionals who combine extensive technical qualifications and knowledge of CECA with many years of experience working on projects similar to the proposed project and in urban environments similar to the project site. Rincon's recent experience includes projects in Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach, Long Beach and Los Angeles. Currently,we are preparing an EIR for a mixed-use residential and hotel project for the City of Burbank as well as EIRs for two hotels in West Hollywood. Our in-house team includes planners, air quality, noise, biological, and cultural specialists.We are recognized experts in greenhouse gas analysis and climate change issues.To augment our in-house expertise,we have included Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Inc. (LLG)to conduct the traffic impact study. Rincon has successfully partnered with LLG on numerous projects throughout the region. We believe that you will find our proposed approach to the assignment thorough,yet cost-effective. We appreciate the opportunity to propose on this important assignment. Sincerely, Rincon Consultants, Inc. ..., Susanne Huerta,AICP Joe Power,AICP CEP Senior Environmental Planner Principal/Vice President (213)-788-4842 x 104 (805) 644-4455 x 12 shuerta@rinconconsultants.com jpower@rinconconsultants.com Contact for Clarification i � i i , i 1 1 n Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal o Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel oliilh �Nf'BI, hloi�l' h Y'�n „I, li„,i iu J �„li 9i.paLV IVY;";Yq,'l,r9p,9�' liiid .16 I "I'' I II ..1.11'„ iiiiA 1. Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................„.,.,.....,..........,....,., .........,................,....,.,.,......1 1.1 Project Understanding. ........................ ...............„.,.................„..... .,....................,,.,............1 2. Scope of Work.,........ ......__'_......... —.......... ....__............____............. 2 Task1—Kick-Off Meeting...............................................................................................................2 Task2—Technical Studies.................................................................................„.,.....,..,..,..............,2 Task 3—Administrative Draft IS.....................................................................................................5 Task 4—Public and Agency Review Draft IS-MND.........................................................................6 Task5—Final IS-MND..........................................................................................................„..,........6 Task 6—Project Management Meetings and Hearings........................„,........,...............,..............6 Task7—Notices and Mailings.......... ....._..... ....... . ......................................„.........,.........,...,.,....7 3. Schedule..........................................................................................................„..,...........................,.... 4. Cost.................... ........,.........,.. 9 5. Project Team Qualifications and Resumes.......................... ..................„.10 5.1 Rincon Consultants, Inc. ....... ...... .........,.......... „,...........,....,10 5.2 Relevant Project Experience..................................................................................................10 5.3 Linscott, Law&Greenspan.................................................................................,..,..,..............,13 5.4 Key Personnel and Resumes................................................................................................„,13 Appendices Appendix A—Traffic Technical Scope Appendix B—Resumes ... _.......... .�....................... _.........w. __ City of EI Segundo w Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning.Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel This proposal was printed on 50%recycled post-consumer content paper. ................... ..... VY' City of EI Segundo ii Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel The City of EI Segundo(City) is requesting services from an environmental consultant to conduct the required California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) documentation and associated environmental studies for the development of the Segundo House Hotel project, a boutique hotel. The proposed scope of services will consist of preparing an Initial Study-(Mitigated) Negative Declaration (IS-MND), including an Air Quality Study(including Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis), Cultural Resource Study, and Noise and Acoustical Study. Rincon has prepared numerous IS-MNDs and EIRs for projects throughout southern California, including in the cities of Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach, Long Beach, Beverly Hills, and Los Angeles.To help ensure that our environmental and planning documents are technically sound, we maintain a staff of professionals and subject matter experts in air quality, noise,geology, biological resources,greenhouse gases (GHG), permitting, contamination assessment and remediation, health risk analysis, environmental engineering, and land use planning.This cross-discipline team of experts provides different ways of seeing the consequences of projects on the environment. To augment our team,we have included Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Inc. (LLG)to prepare a traffic impact study. Rincon has teamed with LLG for many years and on several recent projects with the cities of Long Beach and Chino Hills. Rincon has a strong working relationship with LLG and can attest to their work product quality. The cornerstone of our business philosophy is focused on partnering with clients —working with you as your advocate and expert. Rincon has achieved remarkable success completing projects successfully by committing resources, partnering with agency staff, maintaining project schedules,and delivering quality work products. Our experience with similar projects and understanding of local environmental conditions will facilitate the efficient completion of the IS-MND for the Segundo House Hotel project. I N . I U II („ I ) I N 1 a The applicant is proposing to develop the Segundo House Hotel on an approximately 1.3-acre site located at 707 Sepulveda Boulevard that is currently developed with a surface parking lot and former restaurant/tavern.The project site is designated General Commercial by the City's General Plan and zoned C-3, General Commercial.The proposed project would involve demolition of the existing building for construction of a four-story, 59,405 square-foot boutique hotel.The proposed hotel would include 116 guest rooms, a fitness room, 10 bicycle parking spaces, and a subterranean parking garage that would provide 91 basement parking spaces and two surface parking spaces for employees and hotel guests. A parking demand study has been submitted by the applicant to reduce the required parking from 107 spaces to 93 spaces.The site is surrounded by a sit-down restaurant to the north,a fast food restaurant to the south,an office building to the east, and multi-family residences to the west. The applicant is also requesting approval of a zoning code amendment that would increase the allowable height from 40 to 55 feet and allow additional FAR on 23 C-3 zoned properties on the west side of Sepulveda Boulevard and one parcel at the southeast corner of E. Imperial Avenue and California Street.The amendment would also allow Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) between the same C-3 zoned properties west of Sepulveda Boulevard. We understand that the City is requesting environmental review that will include a peer review of the traffic impact study and an air quality/greenhouse gas study. Rincon also proposes to conduct a noise study because of the sensitive land uses to the west of the project site and a cultural resources study due to the age of the existing on-site building. As necessary, mitigation measures will be included in the environmental analyses to avoid significant environmental impacts. City of EI Segundo i. Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel 2. Scope of Work The following scope of work has been developed based on our understanding of the proposed project, our previous experience completing environmental documents for other suburban cities similar to EI Segundo, and our knowledge of environmental regulations related to development projects in EI Segundo. The tasks below outline our approach to completing the IS-MND and CEQA review process.This proposal assumes that all project impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level and that an EIR will not be required. However, if during the preparation of the IS it is determined that one or more issues will or may have significant and unavoidable impacts, Rincon will notify the City immediately to discuss an appropriate course of action. The CEQA document will meet all the requirements set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA guidelines (California Code of Regulations, section 15000 et seq.). Our general work program for the MND,which conforms to what is requested in the RFP, is described below. Task 1 — Kick-tiff reefing Rincon's Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager will attend a kick-off meeting with the City and, if appropriate,the applicant.The meeting will serve to discuss: Communication protocol * Data needs IN Project timeline and steps in the environmental process Preview of any prominent issues for the project Schedule Task 2®Technical Studies ;:;1 I u Illi :.I V �Ni.,i�°:e^ Rincon proposes to prepare a combined Air Quality/GHG Study since the background information and underlying calculations for these two issues are closely related.The Air Quality analysis will be prepared in accordance with the methodologies prescribed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).The air quality analysis will include the following: • Model temporary and long-term emissions using the most current version of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). Emissions will be calculated based on the scope of the project and associated vehicle trips. • Compare temporary emissions generated during demolition,site preparation, and construction to SCAQMD regional thresholds and Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). • Calculate operational emissions based on the land use and traffic trips associated with the proposed project using the latest version of CalEEMod.The daily operational vehicle trips used in the analysis will be based on the applicant-provided traffic impact study. Perform a carbon monoxide "hot spot" screening analysis if the traffic impact study indicates that an intersection(s)will be substantially congested.There is no evidence to indicate that dispersion using the CALINE4 model would be required for the proposed project. Discuss odors associated with diesel-fueled vehicles, particularly as they relate to construction. Analyze the project's consistency with the SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan. Identify measures that the applicant proposes to use to reduce air quality impacts, such as: �rrCity of EI Segundo 2 Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel • Specific worker transportation control measures during the construction period; • Dust control measures during construction and operation; • Measures to minimize or avoid stationary source emission impacts; and • Measures to minimize engine idling during construction. Develop mitigation measures and recommendations as needed to reduce pollutant emissions to the extent feasible and practicable. The GHG analysis will evaluate the project's potential contribution to cumulative impacts related to climate change.The analysis will include the following tasks: • Describe the applicable GHG emissions/climate change regulatory framework, including applicable federal,state, and local regulations and standards. • Describe the methodology and significance thresholds, which will detail the criteria for determining a project's contribution to cumulative GHG emissions/climate change impacts (SCAQMD's recommended quantitative threshold is 3,000 metric tons/year). • Quantify carbon dioxide equivalent KOM units associated with proposed construction and project operation using CalEEMod (emissions will be estimated for construction, motor vehicle trips, natural gas combustion, electricity use,water demand, and solid waste generation). • Determine the significance level of project generated GHG emission contributions to cumulative GHG emissions/climate change. • Identify any necessary or recommended mitigation measures (including measures already included to address other short-term and operational air quality impacts). Assess residual GHG emissions impacts. Rincon will conduct a California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center(SCCIC) located at California State University, Fullerton.The records search will reveal the nature and extent of any cultural resources work previously conducted within the project site and adjacent vicinity. Based on our review of the project site,the existing building was constructed in 1957. In accordance with the City's Historic Preservation regulations (Section 15-14 of the EI Segundo Municipal Code), Rincon will survey the project site for built environment resources since the building was constructed more than 50 years ago. Upon completion of the SCCIC records search and built environment survey, Rincon will prepare a cultural resources technical report and California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR)forms for all properties evaluated for California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) eligibility. Rincon will assist the City with Native American government-to-government consultation in accordance with AB 52 and SB 18. Rincon assumes that the City will provide a list of tribes who have requested AB 52 notification from the City. Rincon will draft letters and maps for Native American tribal government contacts and provide the City with a tracking sheet and instructions for successful AB 52 and SB 18 consultation. For AB 52 Native American contacts have 30 days to respond and request further consultation. For SB 18 Native American contacts have 30 days to respond and request further consultation. Rincon will also conduct a desktop paleontological resources impact assessment. Based on the results of these tasks,our analysis will identify potential project impacts and recommended avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures,as applicable,for potential effects to on-site cultural resources. City of EI Segundo 3 Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Bouli ue Hotel i . I The routing of traffic associated with the project will be a critical element in determining the significance of noise effects. Rincon will use the information provided by the traffic report to determine the possible effects on sensitive receptors.The following outlines the tasks involved in the noise technical study: IN Conduct up to four 15-minute peak hour noise measurements to characterize existing ambient noise levels on the project site and at adjacent noise-sensitive receptor locations. IN Compare existing ambient noise levels on the project site to applicable community noise compatibility guidelines established by the City of EI Segundo to evaluate the project's compatibility with the existing noise environment. ■ Characterize and generally quantify temporary noise and vibration levels at nearby noise-sensitive receptors based on construction information (typical equipment use, duration, and location of use) to be provided by the applicant. If specific construction information is not available, Rincon can make assumptions about these items.Temporary noise and vibration levels will be estimated based on construction equipment noise levels reported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Federal Highway Administration's Roadway Construction Noise Model Version 1.1. ■ Model existing and future mobile noise levels at noise-sensitive receptors based on the applicant's traffic impact study or traffic data provided by the City.Traffic noise will be forecast using the Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model Version 2.5,or other applicable model,to quantify noise impacts along local roadways. Characterize and generally quantify noise generated by permanent on-site noise sources based on project site plans and their locations with respect to nearby noise-sensitive receptors. Compare noise levels to applicable City noise standards. As necessary, provide recommendations for construction and operational noise at noise-sensitive receptor property lines,and estimate future noise levels with recommendations implemented. LLG will conduct the Traffic Peer Review based on the following scope of work. LLG's entire scope of work is provided in Appendix A. IN Traffic Task 1: Project Mobilization 13 1.1—Confirm the development description with the project team,work schedule, and assumptions to be considered as part of the peer review. Obtain the current project site plan that illustrates the access scheme to the project site in both hard copy and digital formats and obtain a copy of the Applicant's traffic and parking analyses/studies. 13 1.2—Contact City of EI Segundo staff to discuss the proposed project and the traffic study assumptions and analysis methodology(e.g.,formulation of the project study area, analysis conditions,etc.)employed by the Applicant's traffic consultant. ■ Traffic Task 2: Review of the Applicant's Traffic Study and Parking Analysis 13 2.1—Review the existing conditions section and existing level of service (LOS) analysis including the traffic count data, lane configurations,traffic signal phasing, among others. 13 2.2—Review the project trip generation and trip distribution. Provide an independent weekday daily,AM and PM peak hour trip generation forecast for the proposed project and compare to the trip generation forecast included as part of the Applicant's traffic study. ILI 2.3—Review the existing plus project conditions section and corresponding LOS analysis. 13 2.4—Review the cumulative and cumulative plus project conditions section and LOS inputs and corresponding analyses. City of EI Segundo 4 Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel 2.5—Review the parking analysis including the proposed project parking supply,the City's zoning ordinance parking requirements, as well as the parking demand analysis. Based on the review of the City's RFP, LLG understands that the parking demand study provided by the Applicant's consultant justified a reduction in parking from 107 total spaces to 93 spaces. 13 2.6—Review the potential project-related and cumulative traffic impacts, as well as the proposed mitigation, if applicable and the corresponding mitigation effectiveness. Review the potential residual impacts, if any,and provide a statement documenting the residual impacts. LLG will review the project study area to make sure that it adequately addresses potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed project.As part of this review, LLG will recommend whether additional analysis locations(i.e.,other City of EI Segundo study intersection/s, Caltrans freeway mainline segment/s, Caltrans freeway ramp intersection/s,etc.)should be added to the traffic study. Should additional study location/s be recommended, LLG would inform the project team and the City to have the Applicant's consultant revise the traffic study accordingly. 13 2.7—Review the Congestion Management Program (CMP)traffic analysis including impact criteria, potential impacts associated with CMP arterial intersection and freeway monitoring locations, and proposed mitigation, if applicable. Should the need for additional or alternative CMP mitigation be identified, LLG would inform the project team and the City to have the Applicant's consultant revise their analysis accordingly. Traffic Task 3: Site Access and Circulation Review 3.1—Review the proposed site plan. Review the site access recommendations included in the traffic study. ■ Traffic Task 4: Preparation of Review Memorandum 4.1—Prepare a draft memorandum that details all the above-mentioned items,our analysis, findings and conclusions.The draft memorandum will be suitably documented with tabular, graphic and appendix materials as needed.The draft memorandum will be submitted for your review and review by appropriate members of the project team. 4.2—If necessary, update the draft memorandum based on project team comments (one round of revisions assumed). Submit a final memorandum to the team and the City of EI Segundo for their review and consideration. Task 3- Administrative Draft IS Rincon will prepare an Administrative Draft IS using the CEQA Appendix G environmental checklist. Rincon will submit one electronic copy of the Administrative Draft IS in PDF format and five bound copies of the IS-MND. The Administrative Draft IS will evaluate each of the 18 issue areas on the CEQA environmental checklist.The IS will address: (1)the specific impacts of the currently proposed Segundo House Hotel; and (2)the conceptual impacts of the proposed zoning code amendments as they may affect other parcels along the west side of Sepulveda Boulevard and the one parcel at the southeast corner of E. Imperial Avenue and California Street.The analysis of the Segundo House Hotel proposal will be a project level and will include quantification of such items as air pollutant emissions,greenhouse gases, noise,traffic,and utilities. It will also include modeling of shade/shadow impacts associated with the hotel and consider applicant-provide visual tools such as elevations and photosimulations. The analysis of potential impacts at the other properties will describe the types of changes that could potentially occur on these properties, but will not involve specific quantification of impacts that assumes all affected properties are built out to the maximum allowable height and FAR under the updated C-3 VV 5 City of EI Segundo Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel zone. Instead, impacts will be described conceptually and, as necessary, appropriate triggers for additional analysis will be developed as mitigation to be implemented as necessary as individual properties are redeveloped.The analysis of other properties will include such items as records searches for cultural resources and hazardous materials,general field reconnaissance of the properties to identify potential environmental constraints, and identification of potential shade/shadow impacts associated with the increase in maximum building height from 40 to 55 feet. Rincon will incorporate information from any relevant and available technical studies to assist in addressing checklist issues.Where appropriate, impacts will be quantified in relation to established thresholds of significance.A determination of significance will be made for each issue area and mitigation measures will be provided as necessary for identified significant effects. Although each topic will be discussed in appropriate detail in the Administrative Draft IS,we anticipate that key issue areas for the project will include aesthetics, air quality and GHGs, cultural resources, noise, and transportation/traffic. Task 4 - Public and Agency Review Draft IS-MND Assuming that the project can be processed with an IS-MND, Rincon will respond to internal team comments on the Administrative Draft IS and format the document as a Draft IS-MND to be distributed for public review. Up to 20 bound or electronic copies of the Draft IS-MND will be provided to the City. Rincon will be responsible for distribution of the Public Review Draft IS-MND to the Clearinghouse, which will require 15 electronic copies of the document, as well as circulation of the Notice of Intent to Adopt an IS-MND to state agencies and neighboring jurisdictions, and for posting with the County Clerk. Rincon will also prepare the draft newspaper notice and Rincon assumes the City will publish the required newspaper notice. Task 5 — Final IS—MND receipt of all public and agency comments on the Draft IS-MND, Rincon will prepare draft responses for City review. Upon receipt of internal review comments on the draft responses,we will incorporate changes and prepare the Final IS-MND. Upon Final IS-MND approval, Rincon will produce up to 5 hard copies and 5 CDs of the Final IS-MND (including responses to comments). We will also prepare the CEQA findings for the project and include them in electronic format. Rincon will file the Notice of Determination (NOD)within five days of any project approval. Task 6- Project Management Meetings and Hearings In addition to the kick-off meeting, Rincon's Principal-in-Charge and/or Project Manager will attend two in-person meetings with City staff.These meetings will be scheduled as appropriate and are anticipated to occur after completing the Administrative Draft IS and prior to producing the Final IS-MND. We will participate in conference calls as necessary throughout the process, including regularly scheduled status update calls if desired by the City. I ;N II �u 4 cd �u au s Ai u o „uu a iu i,.H1p a ^'n Uui a :;i Rincon's Principal-in-Charge or Project Manager will attend three public hearings(assumed to be two Planning Commission hearings and one City Council hearing) on the project. If requested,we will prepare and deliver a presentation that summarizes the CEQA process and the findings of our analysis. City of EI Segundo 6 Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Bouflclue Hotel Task 7 Notices and Mailings As discussed in Tasks 4 and 5, Rincon will be responsible for the required CECA notices.These include the following: d Provide certified mailing of the Draft IS-MND, Notice of Intent and Notice of Completion to the State Clearinghouse, responsible agencies, interested public,county clerk,and trustee agencies d Publishing of the Notice of Intent to Adopt an IS-MND in a newspaper of general circulation • Filing the Notice of Determination with the State Clearinghouse and/or County Clerk City of EI Segundo 7 Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies -Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel 3. Schedule The following schedule was developed to identify the projected timeline for each task and overall duration of the proposed project. 13 Kick-Off Meeting- Rincon's Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager will attend a kick-off meeting within 1 week of authorization to proceed. • Administrative Draft IS and Technical Studies- Rincon will submit the Administrative Draft IS, including the technical studies,within 6 weeks of project kickoff. Rincon assumes one round of City review and a 1-week turnaround. • Public and Agency Review Draft IS-MND- Rincon will submit the Draft IS-MND within 2 weeks of receipt of comments on the Administrative Draft IS from the City;we will submit subsequent internal drafts within one week of City comments. The Draft IS-MND will be distributed for the required 30-day public and agency review period. • Final IS-MND—Rincon will submit the Administrative Final IS-MND (including responses to comments on the Draft IS-MND), MMRP, and Findings within two weeks of receipt of all public and agency comments on the Draft IS-MND;submit subsequent internal review versions and the Final EIR within one week of receipt of City comments • Notices and Mailings- Rincon will prepare the Notice of Intent to Adopt an IS-MND and submit the required CEQA notices along with the Review Draft IS-MND.The Notice of Determination will be prepared and the required CEQA notices processed after the Final IS-MND has been adopted. • Project Meetings and Hearings- Rincon will attend 3 public hearings as scheduled by the City. In addition, we will attend 2 project management meetings. Rincon Consultants, Inc. �dhl' III Iu,.,uu,.il u , b;:; u u aI u u oII nit i� g II y� I'i ,... .. .. 4 II 'Ir,.,II ................,.,....,.,.,....,.,..,,,,,,.,,.,..,,.,.,...-..........,.....................ww.,.,.,.,.,ww,.,.,,....w.w.w.w...,,,,.. .......,....M._._.._......._....,,..,.,.,.,,,...,............,........,...................................,.,...,,.,,..,......,,,.........,,.. 4/9/2018 R;..II,, IHiVnnuun,Iln➢, N11�iywum.11n ", IY.1�m lin E IPO'ni n,wllW11 d, � n II iilr7mN7rllu^y malLvpnlPllu u; 1. Kickoff Meeting 2. Technical Studies NxW WIN, 1 3. Admin Draft Initial Study ............ ... ...... . 4. Draft IS-MND Preparation&Public Review I.iili'lill �wwwwwwww,wrnr� p-,.... 6 Final ct MND ......,�.�...,-,._I' ...... .........._...._ ,� 6.2 Community Meeting&Publi Meetings(TBD by City) 2 i'III�IIV e 110 f MW Work in Progress Public Review 110 City Review Meeting City of EI Segundo 8 Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies-1 µ 4. Cosf Our fee to complete the scope of work described above,which includes technical studies as well as an IS-MND, is$70,268,as detailed in the following table.This includes all required CEQA notices and mailings. If the IS determines that an EIR is required,we will negotiate a scope and fee for the EIR at that time.The cost to prepare an EIR would depend on which issues are determined to have potentially significant impacts and require further analysis in the EIR. RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. A I � E° ; N„ �, I! �n I III Task 1:Kickoff Meeting $1,595 ... 9 4 4 Task 2:Environmental Studies Task2.1:Air Quality/GHG $4,210 37 1 6 24 2 2 2 Task2.2:Cultural Resources $6,970 59 1 16 36 2 2 2 Task 2.3:Noise $4,210 37 1 6 24 2 2 2 Task 2.4:Traffic See below Task 3:Ad mi n Draft IS $15,540 130 10 20 80 4 8 8 Task 4:Draft IS Preparation&Public Review $5,280 44 2 12 20 2 4 4 Task 5:Final IS-MND $4,710 38 2 12 20 2 2 Task 6:Project Management Meetings and Hearings Task 6.1:Project Management Meetings(2) $2,280 12 6 6 Task 6.2:Community Meeting&Public Hearings(3) $5,700 30 15 15 Task 7:Notices and Mailings(Directcosts only) $1,450 13 1 2 4 2 4 Project Management $4,680 30 6 20 4 M ,.w.....wwww. ....».......»»»......,...».........................» .,..........».,.»..,.............�._..m.....,., lil nI ....._..Print Draft lS �.,�.",.�...M..................��P..,. .,..,.......jw.W»,,,..... ..�..........,.,....w...�...,,, »,.......... MND 20 hard co less 15 CDs 875 .., hard coples.5 CDs) ................................. ...............................»225 ........_- . Cultural Resou,rce1,,,,Records Search 5u Gansu teo,tP........................ LtG ... 9SQ..� ..__ d ,!General..andA...mIstrative .... ...! w.w................................................................................ .. ......................)��.Q.,. Miscellaneous Expenses S 1,Spp ..............._........................ ,...,...,...... ......,..�.�..............�.�_.......,........,...... .»........ .. ._....,,.e�tOtalt,dk7f9.....»......,.._».»....»., o o.�.��'�...V....»�....,.....� S .,.......� I City of EI Segundo 9 Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel ® Project Team Qualifications gip^ R 1I u u..,u��C.,IS u �lu Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) is a multi- disciplinary environmental sciences, planning, Firm Name:Rincon Consultants,Inc. and engineering consulting firm that provides quality professional services to government and Founded: 1994 industry. Our highly trained professionals have Legal Form:California"s" many years of experience in urban, land use, and Corporation environmental planning; regulatory compliance; biological Total Staff:220 resource evaluation and habitat enhancement;soil evaluation and remediation; and related studies including problem- California offices: t i(Los Angeles, Redlands,Carlsbad,Ventura,Santa solving services in geology, hydrology, and waste Barbara,San Luis Obispo,Monterey, management. Our approach to projects is focused on well- Santa Cruz,Oakland,Sacramento, designed solutions that respond to our clients'specific needs Fresno) in a cost-effective manner. website: Rincon principals and senior staff have considerable experience throughout California on a variety of different project types including residential, commercial, and institutional projects. Our philosophy is to provide our clients with a high level of professional expertise,with senior management involvement in all projects. In addition,we have structured our firm to minimize unnecessary overhead costs allowing us to be highly cost competitive for both large and small projects. We believe the following features make the Rincon team especially well-suited to this contract. 13 Extensive Experience in EI Segundo and surrounding communities within Los Angeles county Principal/Senior Level Management Involvement in All Projects 13 Proven Project Management Capabilities 13 Broad Base of In-House Expertise 13 Knowledge of Regulatory Agency Requirements and Procedures 13 Cost Effectiveness )Ea enc e" " Perry Hotel and Residences Specific Plan EIR—8816 It14 I j; Beverly Boulevard Client: City of West Hollywood r w Rincon is assisting the City of West Hollywood with preparation of an EIR for a specific plan that would I N Y 4�Il�rouu �� 411 iuu I, dr, „Y�,,,I w„IMIIIII facilitate demolition of a 34,817-square foot retail and residential building and construction of a new 143,007- ''I'"' square foot mixed-use boutique hotel with 128 r ww guestrooms, ancillary commercial development, and "nIG! residential uses. As part of the scoping process, Rincon is 10 City of EI Segundo Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo n Proposal o Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel preparing an Initial Study to identify relevant issues and refine the environmental analysis for each topic. The results of the scoping process may result in the consideration of additional topics for analysis in the EIR. Select by La Terra Mixed Use Project, Hotel/Residential/Retail-777 North Front Street Client: City of Burbank I II�� III SII I�I �u .^ � piO,Wa III MI�uI IdMloli � pr,l,p � Rincon is working with the City of Burbank(City)to prepare an EIR for the proposed Select by La Terra Mixed Use Project that would contribute to a vibrant, urban community atmosphere in downtown Burbank.The project site, located at 777 North Front Street,would be cleared to accommodate construction of 542 residential units with 700 square feet of retail gallery space and 317 hotel rooms with ground floor and rooftop retail/restaurant uses. Based on experience with similar projects, Rincon anticipates that aesthetics,air quality,greenhouse gases,geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, and traffic will require detailed analysis and may have significant effects on the project. Staybridge Suites Hotel IS-MND—2640 North Lakewood � Boulevard Client: City of Long Beach Rincon prepared an IS-MND for the Staybridge Suites Hotel proposed at 2640 North Lakewood ewood Boulevard in Long Beach.The project involved a six-story, 125-room hotel to be built on the site of an existing 50-room hotel that is to be demolished. An adjacent 13-story, 172-room hotel would remain.The existing grade-level parking would be supplemented with a second deck above the existing parking area.The project involved a zone change request that affected three parcels with the purpose of allowing greater building height. " Vlf ^II 9900 Wilshire Boulevard Supplemental EIR fly I„ Client: City of Beverly Hills "tlh!I" �4r' Rincon completed a Supplemental EIR for the 9900 Wilshire I � vl ''°j"IIIOIV� 4�II iG'I (One Beverly Hills) Project.A Specific Plan was adopted for „ , NIIINY' Ila the 9900 Wilshire Project in April 2008 approving two high �I Vllmllool QI rise residential towers plus commercial development.The II I uuuuu .y �I I IIIIIIIII" Iw II u�^� IIS I�Bflllulu�o Supplemental EIR was required to assess a modification to the Specific Plan that would allow for a 134-room hotel in �rdiiiiiillllllll" place of planned residential units.The overall building area ," „I,"IVtlpp � Ilq""',�QwQniulul''^ and footprint of the development were nearly identical to that of the approved 2008 project. Therefore,the Supplemental EIR focused on issues for which conditions had changed substantially since the 2008 FEIR certification. An area of concern was that the City had adopted a new General Plan after the 2008 project approval creating the need for re-analysis of General Plan consistency. Key environmental issues included traffic, air quality,greenhouse gas emissions, noise, land use compatibility,and water demand.As part of the CEQA process, Rincon City of EI Segundo 11 Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique, Hotel worked closely with City staff, including the City Attorney,to prepare a very involved response to the comments document that effectively addressed numerous attorney and consultant-prepared letters prepared on behalf of project opponents IL Rondell Oasis Hotel IS-MND—26300 Rondell Street ql Client: City of Calabasas ^ Rincon prepared an IS-MND for the proposed Rondell Oasis Hotel.The project site, located at 26300 Rondell Street and µ'14V1 zoned Commercial Retail,was vacant and previously graded.The site was located within the Ventura Freeway V qui ii l�plIPr di 0 and Las Virgenes Scenic Corridor and within the boundaries of the Las Virgenes Gateway Master Plan.The project involved a four-story, 127-room hotel with a pool and surface parking. The applicant was requesting a variance from the City's 35-foot height limit to allow the 50-foot-tall structure.The applicant also requested that the City vacate the portion of Rondell Street that abuts the western property line. Rincon provided a peer review of an Oak Tree Report that was prepared for the proposed hotel.The peer review provided an objective critique of the existing oak tree report and existing site conditions to determine its compliance with the City of Calabasas Oak Tree Protection Ordinance 17.32.010. 6" iial milli u' N V it ii a' li a IIiIIVIy U u*I'uI II IIRIi ihl Iliilll II 750 North Francisca Hotel and Amendments i Client: City of Redondo Beach 750 North Francisca Hotel is locatedn o the east side of z Francisca Avenue between the intersections of Catalina Avenue and Herondo Street.The site was zoned Industrial (1-113)and used as a processing and storage area for dirt/soil, landscaping products,firewood and related items. The proposed project involved discontinuation of the existing operations and development of a two-story,202- room hotel with a single level of semi-subterranean parking and surface parking. The project also included the dedication and improvement of a right-of-way along Francisca Avenue to allow efficient ingress/egress. Hotels are not permitted use within the 1-16 zoning district;thus,the current Coastal Zoning Ordinance, General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan and Harbor Civic Center Specific Plan needed to be amended to accommodate the proposed use. Given the current use of the site, a key issue was ensuring that hazards and hazardous materials were properly identified and remediation requirements, if any, addressed in the CEQA document. Rincon's Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)team, experienced at working with industrial properties, prepared a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment to support the CEQA findings regarding hazards. Other important issues were traffic circulation, construction noise, construction phasing,and building design details as they related to air emissions and GHG calculations. FY City of EI Segundo 12 Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel To augment Rincon's in-house expertise,we have retained LLG to assist with the traffic and parking analysis peer review. Rincon has successfully partnered with LLG on numerous projects throughout the region. LLG provides transportation planning,traffic engineering, and parking consulting services. Since the firm's founding in 1966, more than 10,000 assignments have been completed involving a wide variety of projects throughout the United States. With the core of their practice focused in Southern California and Nevada, LLG specializes in preparing traffic studies for environmental documents,traffic impact studies,site access and circulation reviews;transportation planning, operations,simulation studies,traffic signing and striping design, construction zone traffic control plans, traffic signal design,street lighting design, and parking design and planning. LLG has extensive experience within the City of EI Segundo. LLG's core capabilities are strongly aligned to the requirements of the traffic-related scope of work for the proposed Project as required by the City of EI Segundo. LLG's over 50-year history has produced a resume of experience that goes beyond simple traffic studies, dealing instead with impact evaluation for environmental documents requiring extensive public review and hearing support,complex multimodal aspects, intricate access and circulation networks, expansive study areas with multi-jurisdictional forecasting requirements and impact criteria, a wide array of land use types and mixed-use development programs with unique trip-making characteristics, and multi-phased projects, mitigation, and improvements. In addition to having detailed knowledge of widely accepted methodologies and techniques, LLG has extensive experience in operational planning/diagnostics/trouble shooting/creative applications, and, if necessary,fine tuning and expansion of established procedures. �:u °w IC " n" I I I :MII �:�u I11k A II uII a ud ;, Our team possesses extensive project management skills and the technical knowledge to meet the budgetary and scheduling constraints inherent in this project.The team will be led by Principal-in- Charge,Joe Power,AICP,CEP. He has over 24 years of experience directing planning projects, including CEQA and technical environmental analyses. Rincon's Project Manager,Susanne Huerta,AICP has over 10 years of experience preparing environmental and planning documents and technical impact analyses for a variety of projects. Ms. Huerta will oversee day-to-day oversight and will serve as the City's primary contact. Bios of key team members are provided below; complete resumes are in the Appendix B. Rincon-Joe Power,AICP CEP, Principal Education: M.A.,Architecture and Urban Planning, UCLA Graduate School of Architecture and Urban Planning B.A., Urban and Economic Geography, University of Georgia Mr. Power will serve as the Principal-in-Charge. He has more than 24 years of experience in CEQA and NEPA document preparation and is an expert in interpreting state and federal planning and environmental law,as well as in developing environmental documentation that is informative, readable, and legally defensible. He has prepared specialized technical reports on a range of i� planning and environmental topics, including noise air quality,greenhouse gases,sustainability, and water supply. In his capacity as Rincon's Planning Manager, Mr. Power provides technical oversight and QA/QC services for CEQA and NEPA documents prepared by Rincon planning staff.These documents range from detailed EIRs to technical 13 City of EI Segundo Agreement NO. 5527 City ofBSegundo proposal k)ConductEnvi0nmento\ Stud�s-Zon' CodeAmendmentondNew Boutique MuK*| ' memorandums. Mr. Power also heads Rincon's sustainability services group and oversees a wide range of projects, including climate action plans,greenhouse gas studies, LEED/green building analyses,and general plan elements. Rincon-Susanne Muertm,AICF,Senior Environmental Planner - - Education: Master ofUrban Planning, Robert Wagner Graduate School oƒ Public Service, New York University 8.A, Geography, University q/California, Los Angeles Ms. Ill will serve asthe Project Manager and Primary Contact for the City under this contract. She ixaSenior Environmental Planner for Rincon's Environmental Planning and Sustainability group and manager ofRincon'sLos - - ~ Angeles office. Ms. Huertaisresponsible for managing and preparing ' environmental and planning documents and technical impact analyses for a � vahetyofpn� ' �cts She iscurrently managing the preparation ufanE\Rthe 777 N. Front Street project in the City of Burbank that includes hotel, residential and commercial uses.She has extensive experience managing numerous projects in the cities of Chino Hills, Beverly Hills,West Hollywood and Los Angeles. Rincon-Shannon Carmnmch,Architectural Historian/Historian 11, Education: B.A., History, emphasis/nAmerican History, California State um�m�mm"m University, Long Beach;A.A.,Anthropology, Orange Coast College, California Ms. Carmack will prepare the Cultural Resources Phase I Report under this contract. She isanArchitectural Historian and Historian for R|ncmn. She has more than 16years ofprofessional experience providing cultural resources management and historic preservation planning for large-scale and high-profile projects. She has worked throughout California in numerous sectors including local planning,development/construction, public utilities, Department of Defense,transportation, recreation, and education. Ms.Carmack prepares documentation tosatisfy CE[U\/NEPA'Section 1O6,and Local Historic Preservation Ordinances.She also provides reports and studies that are in compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties(Standards)and the California Historic Building Code.She has developed and implemented successful mitigation for countless projects that included Historic American Building Survey(HABS)documentation,oral histories and interpretive programs, Ms. Carmack meets and exceeds requirements in the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards in Architectural History and History. Wiwcmw-Chris Bersbamh,MES0N,Technical Services Program Manager Education: M.ElM., Conservation Planning, BoenSchool 4fEnvironmental Science and Management, University ufCalifornia,Santa Barbara 8.A, Psychology, Brandeis University Mr. Bersbachisthe Technical Services Program Manager for Rincun'x Environmental Sciences and Planning group and Sustainability Services group. He is responsible for managing and preparing a wide range of urban planning, land use, and technical studies, including CEOAand NEPA compliance documentation,air quality and Gill emissions analyses, noise impact analyses, and climate ' Mr.��r 8ersbach'sexperience indudesovv|derange uf projects including land and infrastructure development, urban redevelopment, solar power facilities,oil extraction and refining facilities, landfills,general plans,specific plans, and City ofBSegundo Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Proposal to Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel other long-range planning documents. Mr. Bersbach is thoroughly familiar with air quality,greenhouse gas, and noise modeling techniques as well as applicable regulations. He has prepared air quality,GHG, and noise studies for projects in such communities as Los Angeles,Carson, and Azusa. Rincon-Vanessa Villanueva,Associate Environmental Planner lil II,I,I, ll� Education: B.S., Environmental Science, University of California, Los Angeles „IIIIIIII Ms. Villanueva has experience preparing CEQA and NEPA environmental IIS assessments,technical studies, air quality and GHG emissions analyses, noise impact analyses, and conducting field work necessary to complete high quality technical noise analyses. Ms. Villanueva's experience includes urban development,general plans,specific plans,and other comprehensive planning documents, as well as interacting with various members of public agency and private client staff on matters related to land use planning,CEQA/NEPA compliance, and land development application processing. Ms.Villanueva is thoroughly familiar with air quality,greenhouse gas, and noise modeling techniques, and has completed technical analyses for a variety of projects throughout southern California. Rincon-Jennifer Pezda, MESM,Associate Environmental Planner Education: M.E.S.M., Master of Environmental Science and Management, The Bren School of Environmental Science and Management B.A., Environmental Science&Policy, University of California,San Diego m Ms. Pezda is responsible for preparation of planning and environmental documents. She has experience in the environmental science and planning field p p g myjlli and has a background in preparation of CEQA and NEPA documents such as pp Initial Studies and EIRs.She also has experience working with planning Illii �I�ry�Vlu"'„ coordination between utilities and local city planning departments. Rincon-Meagan Szromba, MA,RPA,Associate Archaeologist Education: M.A., Public Archaeology, California State University, Northridge, 2016 B.A.,Anthropology, California State University, Long Beach, 2013 e Ms. Szromba is an archaeologist with extensive experience conducting cultural p g MMMMMMMMT!, N��NNNllllllllii resources studies in California. She has performed a full range of archaeological lj llllllliiiil' and historical studies in Southern and Central California. Ms. Szromba has a Master's Degree in Public Archaeology,and has specialized training and N IuiigIIIIIIU experience performing archaeological excavations, monitoring, mitigation and data recovery,surveys,site documentation, and site evaluation. She has prepared numerous cultural resources reports and technical studies for clients throughout California and has worked closely with Native American communities to protect and mitigate impacts to cultural resources. City of EI Segundo 15 Agreement No. 5527 City of EI Segundo Profaosal to Conduct Environmental Studies-Zoning Code Amendment and New Boutique Hotel LLG-Clare M. Look-Jaeger, P.E., Principal Education: B.S., Civil Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wl Ms. Look-Jaeger will serve as Principal-In-Charge for this contract on behalf of LLG.She is the manager of LLG's Pasadena office and has over 30 years of experience in the preparation of transportation planning analyses,with emphasis on the preparation of environmental review analyses for various developments pursuant to the requirements of CEQA. Ms. Look-Jaeger specializes in entitlement processing efforts, particularly on highly controversial projects which involve litigation. Ms. Look-Jaeger is a licensed Traffic Engineer in the State of California. LLG-Alfred C.Ying, P.E., PTP,Senior Transportation Engineer Education: B.S., Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA Mr. Ying will serve as the Project Manager and Primary Contact for the City under this contract. He is a Senior Transportation Engineer with LLG's Pasadena office. Mr.Ying has conducted numerous independent peer reviews for many jurisdictions. Mr.Ying has prepared complex operational analyses for intersections and roadway corridors and is very familiar with 2D and 3D simulation of traffic flows. He has prepared many Caltrans Permit Engineering 141 Evaluation Reports (PEER)for the processing of highway improvements and has performed numerous traffic signal timing,signal progression, and signal warrant analyses. Mr. Ying is a licensed Traffic Engineer in the State of California, a certified Professional Transportation Planner with the Transportation Professional Certification Board, Inc., and a certified Employee Transportation Coordinator with the South Coast Air Quality Management District. 16 City of EI Segundo Agreement No. 5527 Appendix A ................ Traffic Technical Scope Agreement No. 7 I REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Scope of Work Linscott, Law&Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Scope of Work to provide transportation planning consulting services associated with the traffic and parking study peer review work effort for the proposed Segundo House Hotel Project in El Segundo, California. LLG understands that our consultation would consist of two overall work efforts: 1) conduct peer review of the Applicant's traffic and parking studies, and 2) provide recommendations, if necessary, regarding the adequacy of the traffic analysis study area, existing and future conditions, and mitigation measures, if applicable. LLG will also provide corrections to the studies if needed. SCOPE OF WORK Task 1: Proiect Mobilization 1.1 Confirm the development description with the project team,work schedule,and assumptions to be considered as part of the peer review. Obtain the current project site plan that illustrates the access scheme to the project site in both hard copy and digital formats and obtain a copy of the Applicant's traffic and parking analyses/studies. 1.2 Contact City of El Segundo staff to discuss the proposed project and the traffic study assumptions and analysis methodology (e.g., formulation of the project study area, analysis conditions, etc.) employed by the Applicant's traffic consultant. Task 2: 1i cvicw ofthe Appli��lr]t's'Tl°af'fic 'Stwiv. and llarkiu- Allalvsis 2.1 Review the existing conditions section and existing level of service (LOS) analysis including the traffic count data, lane configurations, traffic signal phasing, among others. 2.2 Review the project trip generation and trip distribution. Provide an independent weekday daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation forecast for the proposed project and compare to the trip generation forecast included as part of the Applicant's traffic study. 2.3 Review the existing plus project conditions section and corresponding LOS analysis. 2.4 Review the cumulative and cumulative plus project conditions section and LOS inputs and corresponding analyses. Request for Proposal Traffic Impact Study and Parking Peer Review City of El Segundo,California March 2018 F� REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Agreement No. Scope of Work 2.5 Review the parking analysis including the proposed project parking supply,the City's zoning ordinance parking requirements, as well as the parking demand analysis. Based on the review of the City's RFP, LLG understands that the parking demand study provided by the Applicant's consultant justified a reduction in parking from 107 total spaces to 93 spaces. 2.6 Review the potential project-related and cumulative traffic impacts, as well as the proposed mitigation, if applicable and the corresponding mitigation effectiveness. Review the potential residual impacts, if any, and provide a statement documenting the residual impacts. LLG will review the project study area to make sure that it adequately addresses potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed project. As part of this review, LLG will recommend whether additional analysis locations (i.e., other City of El Segundo study intersection/s, Caltrans freeway mainline segment/s, Caltrans freeway ramp intersection/s, etc.) should be added to the traffic study. Should additional study location/s be recommended, LLG would inform the project team and the City to have the Applicant's consultant revise the traffic study accordingly. 2.7 Review the Congestion Management Program(CMP)traffic analysis including impact criteria,potential impacts associated with CMP arterial intersection and freeway monitoring locations, and proposed mitigation, if applicable. Should the need for additional or alternative CMP mitigation be identified,LLG would inform the project team and the City to have the Applicant's consultant revise their analysis accordingly. Task 3: Site Access and Circulation Review 3.1 Review the proposed site plan. Review the site access recommendations included in the traffic study. Task 4: Preoaaratioal of l evieNv MemoramIL1111 4.1 Prepare a draft memorandum that details all of the above-mentioned items, our analysis, findings and conclusions. The draft memorandum will be suitably documented with tabular, graphic and appendix materials as needed. The draft memorandum will be submitted for your review and review by appropriate members of the project team. Request for Proposal Traffic Impact Study and Parking Peer Review City of El Segundo,California March 2018 Agreement No. , a. i IIIA � u &D I REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Scope of Work 4.2 If necessary, update the draft memorandum based on project team comments (one round of revisions assumed). Submit a final memorandum to the team and the City of El Segundo for their review and consideration. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Work items requested outside the Scope of Work outlined in this letter, such as the conduct of traffic counts, analysis of additional study locations, preparation of conceptual roadway improvement plans, review of neighborhood traffic impacts, conduct of parking accumulation surveys, additional analyses, responses to public comments, and/or attendance at meetings or public hearing representation may require a contract amendment. No additional work will be performed without prior authorization. Request for Proposal Traffic Impact Study and Parking Peer Review City of El Segundo,California March 2018 Agreement No. 5527 Appendix B Resumes Agreement No. 5527 Rincon Consultants, Inc. Environmental Scientists•Planners•Engineers Joe Power, AICP, CEP SENIOR PRINCIPAL Mr. Power is a Principal and Planning Manager with Rincon Consultants.He has over 25 years of experience in the planning field and has managed or primarily authored successful planning and environmental and planning studies on projects ranging from affordable housing to urban redevelopment to citywide transportation systems. Mr. Power has prepared numerous CEQA and NEPA environmental documents and is an l expert in interpreting state and federal planning and environmental law,as well as in developing environmental documentation that is informative,readable, and legally defensible. He has prepared specialized technical reports on a range of planning and N environmental topics,including noise, air quality,greenhouse gases,sustainability, and water supply. Mr. Power is a skilled public presenter and moderator, having ILII..:: U CAI Ilx;:'.t,l facilitated public workshops for various General Plan Elements and EIRs,and M.A.,Architecture and Urban conducted professional presentations at both the California and National American Planning,UCLA Graduate Planning Association conferences. School of Architecture and Urban Planning(1991) :" i'^",.' B.A.,Urban and Economic CEQA/NEPA Geography,University of Georgia(1985) ■ Over 100 NEPA EAs for affordable housing,commercial rehabilitation,and infrastructure projects, Los Angeles County CDC AF:( IIII....IlAl llC"('4S ■ Over 50 NEPA CEs for affordable housing projects,Santa Barbara County American Planning Housing Authority Association ■ Donlon Road Realignment EIR,County of Ventura American Institute of ■ Reyes Adobe Interchange MND/CE,City of Agoura Hills Certified Planners#010273 ■ Santa Paula Branch Line Recreational Trail EIR/EA,Ventura County - Certified Environmental Transportation Commission Planner Adolfo Road Extension EIR,City of Camarillo s ■ Fulton Street Extension Project NEPA Documentation, City of Ojai IL...RUEN�.:,.E ■ Golden Valley Road and High School EIR,City of Santa Clarita/William S. Hart Rincon Consultants,Inc.(1996 UHSD —present) ■ Golden Valley Road Overcrossing MND/CE,City of Santa Clarita Planning Consultants Research (1996) ■ City of Industry Park and Ride Facility MND/CE, Foothill Transit Fugro West,Inc.(1991—1996) ■ Gold Coast Transit Maintenance Facility MND/CE,Gold Coast Transit City of West Hollywood(1990— ■ NEPA Open Services, City of Mesa,AZ 1991) Memorial Park Reservoir MND/EA,City of Santa Monica South Coast Air Quality ■ Trammel Crow Industrial Business Park MND,City of La Verne Management District(1989- 1990) ■ LBA Realty Industrial Building EIR,City of Eastvale ■ IUSD Maintenance Facility MND, Irvine Unified School District ■ UPS Expansion Project EIR Addendum,City of Ontario ■ Talaria Mixed Use Development EIR,City of Burbank ■ Mangrove Estates Mixed Use Development EIR,City of Los Angeles ■ Town Center Regional Shopping Center EIR, City of Simi Valley ■ The Oaks Mall Expansion EIR,City of Thousand Oaks Agreement No. 5527 Joe Power,AICP,CEP, Page 2 IE'/T1ERNIC::::NC..'E CC...Al)"ID ■ Carryout Bag Ordinance EIR,City of Santa Monica ■ Target Downtown Department Store EIR,City of Santa Monica ■ Press-Telegram Mixed Use Development EIR, City of Long Beach ■ Westmont College Master Plan SEIR,County of Santa Barbara ■ Caltech Master Plan SEIR,City of Pasadena ■ Surfers Point Managed Shoreline Retreat EIR,City of Ventura Ventura County Juvenile Justice Complex EIR,County of Ventura ■ North County Jail Staged EIR,County of Santa Barbara ■ Community Memorial Hospital EIR,City of Ventura ■ Overton, More, Butterfield Ranch and Pinehurst Park CEQA Documentation and IS-MND,City of Chino Hills GENERAL PLANS,SPECIFIC PLANS,AND REDEVELOPMENT PLANS ■ City of Calipatria General Plan Update and Zoning Ordinance ■ City of Chino Hills General Plan Update—Air Quality and GHG Analysis ■ City of Coachella General Plan Update EIR(Noise,Air Quality and GHG)and Noise Element ■ City of Calabasas 2030 General Plan, Development Code,and EIR ■ City of Avalon General Plan and EIR ■ City of Alhambra General Plan Update and EIR ■ City of Pomona General Plan and Corridors Specific Plan EIR ■ City of Ventura 2005 General Plan and EIR ■ City of Carpinteria Noise and Safety Elements and General Plan EIR ■ City of Fillmore General Plan and EIR ■ North Fillmore Specific Plan EIR ■ North Fillmore Business Park Master Plan EIR ■ City of Santa Clarita Circulation Element Update EIR ■ E.Colorado Boulevard Specific Plan EIR,City of Pasadena ■ Whiteside Redevelopment Project EIR, Los Angeles County CDC ■ City of Ventura Downtown Specific Plan EIR ■ West Los Angeles Community Plan EIR,City of Los Angeles ■ Hueneme Beach Park Shore Protection Project,City of Port Hueneme ■ Goleta Beach Master Plan EIR,Chambers Group PU I3 I NCATIONS/PRESENTAK)NS AND AWARDS A Planner's Guide to Sustainable Development,with Kevin J. Krizek, Planning Advisory Service Technical Report No. 467,American Planning Association, December 1996 "De-energizing Our Future,"with Stephen Harrington, Environmental Monitor,Association of Environmental Professionals,Spring 1998 New Directions in Sustainable Development,APA National Conference,San Diego,California,April 1997 Rincon Consultants, Inc. Environmental Scientists•Planners•Engineers �I Agreement No. 5527 Rincon Consultants, Inc. Environmentol Scientists Planners Engineers Susanne Huerta, AICP SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER K": Susanne Huerta is an environmental planner for Rincon's Environmental Sciences and h1 Planning group responsible for managing and preparing environmental and planning �i documents and technical impact analyses for a varlet of projects.She has extensive P Y Y P 1 experience conducting and preparing environmental analyses in accordance with the p, California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Her experience includes a wide range of projects for utility-scale renewable 'IIIIIIIIIII energy development,oil and gas development,flood control and water infrastructure,and linear electrical transmission developments. NII"II..If.;iCIIII II Master of Urban Planning;New DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS York University,Robert Wagner Graduate School of Public a Coptic Orthodox Church IS-MND,City of Chino Hills Service a Keck Graduate Institute Mixed-Use Project IS-MND,City of Claremont B.A.,Geography;University of * Almansor Park Parking Structure Project IS-MND,City of Alhambra California,Los Angeles ■' Santa Ana First Street Family Apartments IS-MND,AMCAL 88th St.and Broadway Senior Housing IS/EA, NHS of Los Angeles County American Institute of Certified a328 N.Oakhurst Drive Residential Development IS-MND,City of Los Angeles Planners,Certified r 7985 Santa Monica Blvd IS-MND,City of West Hollywood Environmental Planner r 9908 S Santa Monica Blvd EIR,City of Beverly Hills A,FFILAA1 110t,JS 9000 Wilshire Blvd CE,City of Beverly Hills American Planning Association RENEWABLE ENERGY M Aspiration Solar MND, Fresno County G::Kh"lf:::IRIIBNCE . Del Sur Solar Ranch EIR, Los Angeles County Rincon Consultants,Inc.(2015 0 Alta East Wind Project EIR/EIS, Kern County —present) Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Project EIR/EIS,Southern California Aspen Environmental Group Desert Region (2007—2015) Burgis Associates,Inc.(2006— 0 City of Palmdale Hybrid Power Plant CEC Staff Assessment,City of Palmdale 2007) r Calico Solar Project CEC Staff Assessment/EIS,San Bernardino County Imperial Valley Solar CEC Staff Assessment/EIS, Imperial County Abengoa Mojave Solar CEC Staff Assessment,San Bernardino County m Carrizo Energy Solar Farm CEC Staff Assessment,San Luis Obispo County Ocotillo Express Wind Project EIR/EIS,Imperial County Morgan Hills Wind Energy Project EIR, Kern County ■ North Sky River Wind Energy Project EIR, Kern County ■ Pacific Wind Energy Project EIR,Kern County ■ Alta-Oak Creek Mojave Wind Energy Project EIR, Kern County Topaz Solar Farm EIR,San Luis Obispo County ■ California Valley Solar Ranch Project EIR,San Luis Obispo County !y � Agreement No. 5527 Susanne Huerta, AICP, Page 2 :::r F kl""),.,U IfE,1:1 r IF/1"'U:!::II::;"61.1 t U^w:IE=:, 1"A' " ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS ■ Downs Substation IS/MND,San Bernardino County ■ Valley South Subtransmission EIR, Riverside County ■ Vine Substation IS/MND,San Diego County ■ Parker-Davis Transmission System Operation&Maintenance Program,Arizona,California, Nevada ■ Gila to North Gila Transmission Line Upgrade,Arizona,California, Nevada ■ West of Devers Upgrades EIR/EIS, Riverside County ■ Coolwater Lugo Transmission Project(CLTP)EIR/EIS,San Bernardino County ■ Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Line Project(TRTP) EIS/EIR, Los Angeles County/Kern County/San Bernardino County ENERGY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ■ EIR Analysis of oil and Gas Well Stimulation Treatments in California ■ ERG West Cat Canyon Revitalization Plan EIR,Santa Barbara County ■ Redondo Beach Energy Project CEC Staff Assessment,City of Redondo Beach ■ Oakley Generating Station CEC Staff Assessment,Contra Costa County ■ Willow Pass Generating Station,Contra Costa County WATER INFRASTRUCTURE ■ Thousand Palms Flood Control Project Subsequent EIR/Subsequent EIS, Riverside County ■ Whitewater River Basin Flood Control Project SEA/MND, Riverside County ■ Lake Gregory Dam,County of San Bernardino ■ Donnell Basin Environmental Documents&Regulatory Permits,San Bernardino County * Rimforest Storm Drain Project EIR,San Bernardino County ■ Littlerock Sediment Removal Project, Los Angeles County ■ Santa Clara River Levee Project SCR-2,Ventura County ■ Sespe Creek Levee Improvements Project IS/EA,Ventura County ■ Alcoa&Auxiliary Dike Projects, Riverside County * Santa Maria River Levee Repair Project EA,Santa Barbara County PERMITTING AND COMPLIANCE ■ Expansion of Playa Del Rey Energy Storage Facility,City of Los Angeles ■ Topaz Solar Project,San Luis Obispo County OTHER PROJECTS ■ Avila Point Project,San Luis Obispo County ■ Santa Margarita Quarry,San Luis Obispo County ■ Transpacific Submarine Fiber Optic Cable System,City of Hermosa Beach ■ Dola and Lanzit Ditch Bridge Replacement Projects,San Bernardino County ■ Baldwin Hills Community Standards District(CSD),City of Culver City U Rincon Consultants, Inc. Environmental Scientists•Planners•Engineers Agreement No. 5527 Rincon Consultants,Inc. Environmental Scientists•Planners•Engineers �I"�I� ,pl,llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII;I;!li'lll lllliii'illl'll'IVillllll Shannon Carmack p �YVimp,Jlldliii ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN/HISTORIAN til^I ""'ll "1iup,p,p,i1111° Shannon Carmack is an Architectural Historian and Historian for Rincon Consultants. p I'ii iy Ms.Carmack has more than 15 years of professional experience providing cultural pp m tlliugjjj resources management and historic preservation planning for large-scale and high- profile h- profile projects.She has worked throughout California in numerous sectors including i; local planning,development/construction, public utilities, Department of Defense, transportation, recreation,and education. Ms.Carmack prepares documentation to satisfy CEQA/NEPA,Section 106,and Local Historic Preservation Ordinances.She also provides reports and studies that are in compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's(Sol)Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties(Standards)and the k°M U ;. , TIIa MSN California Historic Building Code.She has developed and implemented successful mitigation for countless projects that included Historic American Building Survey B.A.,History,emphasis in American History,California (NABS)documentation,oral histories and interpretive programs. Ms.Carmack meets State University,Long Beach and exceeds requirements in the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification (2007) Standards in Architectural History and History. A.A.,Anthropology,Orange a" �......i�°° ,,.q. (:: �::.N E. Coast College;California(2003) . ■ 6634 Sunset Avenue Historic Habitation,City and County of Los Angeles 1.1.(:::x..I E E) ■ Everport Terminal Cultural Resources Assessment, Port of Los Angeles,City and IIL..II, if ll ;m(4U;::;' County of Los Angeles California Council for the ■ Shell Beach Downtown Improvement Plan HRER,City of Shell Beach,County of Promotion of History,Member San Luis Obispo California Preservation ■ Bello Bridge Rehabilitation Project,City of Shell Beach,County of San Luis Obispo Foundation,Member Los Angeles Conservancy, ■ Rivergrove Drive Bridge HRER and HPSR,Community of Whitley Gardens,San Member Luis Obispo County National Trust for Historic ■ Fort McArthur"Hey Rookie" Pool Historic Habitation, City and County of Los Preservation,Member Angeles ■ HABS Documentation, Placentia Growers Association,City of Placentia,County of IPE::I Ijr'II�:I:I:T'�(..."E Orange Rincon Consultants,Inc.(2015 ■' Woodland Hills Fire Station Historic Assessment and HABS,City and County of Los —Present) Angeles SWCA Environmental ■ Long Beach Courthouse Historic Impacts Assessment,City of Long Beach,County Consultants(2009—2015) of Los Angeles Sapphos Environmental,Inc. Chapman's Millrace Relocation and Rehabilitation;San Gabriel Mission, Los (2007—2009) Angeles County LSA Associates,Inc.(2000— ■ Cypress Park Community Center-Youth Facility,City and County of Los Angeles 2007) ■ EI Sereno Recreation Center,City and County of Los Angeles ■ 7 Oakmont Drive Historic-Cultural Monument(HCM)Application,City and County of Los Angeles ■ Edwards Air Force Base,Air Force Research Laboratory Historic Survey,, EAFB, Los Angeles and Kern Counties ■ Windsor Square Design Review,City and County of Los Angeles ■ Edwards Air Force Base Cold War Historic Context, EAFB, Los Angeles and Kern Counties u Agreement No. 5527 Shannon Carmack, Page 2 C R V U ' Venice Post Office Rehabilitation,Venice Beach,City and County of Los Angeles San Pedro Plaza Park Project,City and County of Los Angeles ■ Woodland Hills Recreation Center Project,City and County of Los Angeles Terminal Island Historic Survey Evaluation and Historic Context Statement;City and County of Los Angeles ■ University Park Historic District Design Review,City and County of Los Angeles North Fort Bragg Trail Cultural Resources Services; City of Fort Bragg, Mendocino County East Los Angeles College(ELAC) Firestone Building Cultural Resources Services;South Gate, County of Los Angeles ■ Octagon Barn Center Historic Resources Documentation;San Luis Obispo County ■ Del Rio Road Area Specific Plan EIR;San Luis Obispo County South Los Angeles Wetlands Park Project,City and County of Los Angeles Yosemite Tenaya Lake Area Plan Environmental Assessment; Mariposa County * Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Intermodal Parking Facility Project;Azusa, Los Angeles County ■ Metro Green Line to LAX Project,City and County of Los Angeles Chino Airport Project Cultural Resources Services;Chino San Fernando Valley Park-and-Ride Cultural Resources Services; Encino,City and County of Los Angeles ■ Metro Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor EIR Cultural Resources Services;City and County of Los Angeles Olympic Boulevard and Mateo Street Improvements;City and County of Los Angeles Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Dixie Valley Naval Air Station Historic Evaluation; Dixie Valley, Churchill County, Nevada * Port of Los Angeles Berths 167-169 Rehabilitation Project;City and County of Los Angeles ■ Metro Regional Connector Transit Corridor Project;City and County of Los Angeles Port of Los Angeles Al Larson Boat Shop Historic Assessment;City and County of Los Angeles ACE San Gabriel Trench Project Cultural Resources Services; Los Angeles County,California Hollister Road Bridge Replacement Project;San Luis Obispo County • POLA Berths 301-306 American Presidents Line; Los Angeles County ■ City of EI Paso De Robles Waste Water Treatment Plant Project;San Luis Obispo County Yosemite Communication Data Network Environmental Assessment;Tuolumne County Citywide Historic Context Statement,City of Long Beach, Los Angeles County Downtown Revitalization Project;City of South Pasadena, Los Angeles County ■ Kroc Community Center;City of Long Beach, Los Angeles County HABS Level 2 Documentation, Rancho Los Amigos Historic District;City of Downey, Los Angeles County ■ Long Beach Courthouse Initial Study;City of Long Beach, Los Angeles County World Citrus West Evaluation;City of Fullerton,Orange County LA Plaza de Cultura y Artes Addendum EIR;City and County of Los Angeles ■ HABS Level 2 Documentation, Brunswig Annex, EI Pueblo de Los Angeles National Register Historic District;City and County of Los Angeles Mission Courtyards Project; City of San Miguel,San Luis Obispo County ■ Roger Y.Williams Residence, National Register of Historic Places Nomination;City of San Juan Capistrano, Orange County Analysis of the Pomona Creamery Building;City of Pomona, Los Angeles County Rincon Consultants, Inc. Environmental Scientists•Planners•Engineers VI Agreement NO. 5527 n8ncmnConsultants,Inc. Ev,monmonuol Scientists'Plnnneo'Engineers ����r^� �����h�<�(��� �A���� __. . .� ~--~. _~~ .~ --. .' . . ._—� TECHNICAL SERVICES PROGRAM MANAGER As a manager for Rincon's Technical Services program and an environmental planner for Rinoun'sEnvironmental Sciences and Planning group,Chris 8ersbochis responsible for managing and preparing CEQAand NEPA documentation and ^ technical air quality,greenhouse gas emissions,and noise impact analyses. His experience includes a wide range of technical environmental and planning studies involving land and infrastructure development,urban redevelopment,solar power ~ ' facilities,oil extraction and refining facilities,landfills,general plans and specific plans,climate action plans,and other long-range planning documents. Mr.Bersbach is experienced with a variety of air pollutant and GHG emissions models,which 4 include the CalEEMod land use emissions forecast tool,the most recent version o f the MssKx'Conservation Planning; California Air Resources Board's Mobile Source Emissions Inventory(EMFAC2011), arenSchool ofEnvironmental CALINE4,HARP,AERMOD, ICLEI's Clean Air Climate Protection(CACP)software,the Science&Management,Univ. Local Government Operations Protocol,and the Climate Registry General Reporting ufCalifornia Santa Barbara Protocol.Heuses the Federal Highway Administration's Traffic Noise Model,aswell a.A,Psychology;Brandeis asnoise protocols inuse byovariety ofagencies,including the Environmental University Protection Agency,the Federal Transit Administration,and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. RinconConsultants,Inc.<2nO8 —pnesenU CECAAND NEPA COMPLIANCE Condor Environmental ° San Luis Ranch Project E|K,City of San Luis Obispo Planning Services(zV0s—zOO6) Santa Barbara Community ° 8etteraviaPlaza Project G|R,City nfSanta Maria Environmental Council(2005) a Heritage Ridge Residential Project,City ofGoleta 0 Rancho LaLaguna 8R'County ofSanta Barbara ° OrcuttKey Site 3Environmental Impact Report,County ofSanta Barbara a Orcuit Key Site 30 SE\R,County of Santa Barbara ° YWehtageSenior Living Project SBR,City ofBueUtnn w Santa Margarita Ranch EIR Addendum for Off-Site Air Quality Mitigation Fees, County cfSan Luis Obispo ~ Morro Creek yWu\ti'UseTrai|and Bridge Environmental Services Project,City of Morro Bay ~ Hollister Avenue-State Street Improvements Environmental Services and EIR/EA Project,County of Santa Barbara ~ Harold Way Mixed-Use Project E|R,City ofBerkeley ° San Miguel Tract 271ORosident\a|PnojectEA,Peop\e'sSe|fHe|pHousing'County of San Luis Obispo 0 LeannuCreek Water Line Project MND,City ofArroyo Grande ° Prado Road Residential Tract PnojectN1NDs,OtyufSanLuisObispo 0 Teal Club Specific Plan E\R,City ofOxnard � San Juan Oaks Specific Plan SBR,County mfSan Benito " Johnson Avenue Housing Project E|R,County ufSan Luis Obispo Agreement No. 5527 Chris Bersbach,MESM, Page 2 TECHNICAL STUDIES ■ Talaria at Burbank Mixed-Use Project Health Risk Assessment and Noise Study,City of Burbank ■ Los Flores Knoll Communications Project Environmental Studies,City of Santa Maria ■ Holy Name of Jesus Catholic Community Parish Project Air Quality,Greenhouse Gas Emissions,and Noise Studies, Steinberg Architects,City of Redlands w Mission Lodge 54-Unit Housing Project Noise Study, KB Home Southern California,City of San Gabriel ■ Hampton Inn&Suites Project Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions IS-MND Sections,City of Buellton ■ Beverly Hills Metro Nighttime Noise Mitigation Recommendations Memorandum,City of Beverly Hills ■ Saticoy Area Plan Update Air Quality,Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Health Risk Assessment,and Noise Technical Studies ■ Shoreline Drive Three-Lot Subdivision Project Noise Study,ON Design Architects,Santa Barbara County ■ Hayward Lumber Truss Assembly Plant Project Noise Assessment, Urban Planning Concepts,City of Santa Maria ■ San Joaquin Apartments and Precinct Improvement Project Construction Noise Mitigation Report, University of California Santa Barbara Chelsea Facility Project Noise Study, Ecos Energy LLC, Bennington,Vermont Rancho Malibu Religious Memorial Project Air Quality,Greenhouse Gas Emissions,and Noise Study ■ Mobile Exhaust Health Risk Assessment Reports for Los Angeles Community Development Commission ■ Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Reports for Distributed Solar Sites, Recurrent Energy ■ Construction Air Quality Monitoring for Los Osos Wastewater Treatment Plant Project,San Luis Obispo Public Works Department ■ Crossroads Center Drive-Through Noise and Air Quality Studies,City of Buellton ■ Harvey Mudd College Master Plan Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study, City of Claremont ■ KKSCW Diatomite Development Plan Air Quality Technical Report, Plains Exploration &Production Company, Kern County ■ Carson South Bay Pavilion Theater Air Quality,Greenhouse Gas, and Noise Technical Studies,Vintage Real Estate ■ Mountain House Tract 3551 Residential Noise Analysis, Richmond American Homes ■ VG Property Investments Arcadia Medical Building Air Quality,Greenhouse Gas Emission,and Noise Technical Studies, Pacific Design Group ■ Atlas Copco Santa Maria Manufacturing Environmental Studies,Omni Design Group ■ Digital West Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Studies and Screening-Level Health Risk Analysis,Wallace Group, County of San Luis Obispo ■ Cortona Apartments Residential Project Health Risk Assessment,City of Goleta • Western Sky Amphitheater Sound Level Assessment, Urban Planning Concepts,County of Santa Barbara ■ U.S. Highway 101/Union Valley Parkway Interchange Sound Level Metering Study, PSOMAS,County of Santa Barbara ■ Live Oak Lanes Bowling Alley Air Quality,Greenhouse Gas,and Noise Studies,City of Buellton ■ Columbia Tower Greenhouse Gas Study,Chatrala Group,City of San Diego ■ Mojave West Solar Project Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report,Solar Electric Solutions, Kern County ■ SR-166/SR-1 Air Quality,Greenhouse Gas,and Noise Studies, PSOMAS,County of Santa Barbara ■ SR-166/Black Road Air Quality,Greenhouse Gas,and Noise Studies, PSOMAS,County of Santa Barbara ■ Belmont Village Assisted Living Project Health Risk Assessment, Los Angeles County I j'� i IIS d Iry ll�l� I Rincon Consultants, Inc. Ili III Environmental Scientists•Planners•Engineers Agreement No. 5527 Rincon Consultants, Inc. Environmental Scientists.Planners.Engineers Vanessa Villanueva ASSOCIATE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER 1�I , Vanessa Villanueva is an Associate Environmental Planner for Rincon's Environmental °"'" NP(Ntlrylll;°1I 'll ill IIIIhI��I,° L �9 �!h,Nltl!f��i���'li� Sciences and Planning group responsible for preparing environmental and planning documents,assisting with public and private sector contract planning services,and I�IIII�PIIII17� providing technical impact analyses for a variety of projects.She has experience II'ml 1141INBII!IP �„ � preparing and editing environmental analyses in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) for a variety of projects,including infrastructure, housing and urban development,and long-range planning documents. Her responsibilities include performing research and wI analysis and/or completing assignments within agency offices and for private sector clients as part of Rincon's contract planning service line;preparing CEQA and NEPA environmental assessments and technical studies;assisting with the preparation of B.S.,Environmental Science, General Plans,and other comprehensive planning documents;conducting field work University of California,Los necessary to complete high quality technical noise studies; and interacting with Angeles,2015 various members of public agency and private client staff on matters related to land use planning, CEQA/NEPA compliance,and land development application processing V::u'.If II:::I:II;I II:::I t,l Rincon Consultants,Inc.(2016- F'IR;tl;:".JIEE°::'1f IE::"'P Elr',";IIIE°:A i. :IE:; present) CEQA AND NEPA PROJECTS City of Cudahy,Community a Padres Trail Desilting Basin,City of La Canada Flintridge Development Department, 2015 X Salinas Avenue Housing Project,West Rancho Dominguez-Victoria m South Stanford Avenue Housing Project,West Rancho Dominguez-Victoria 0 Blue Hibiscus Housing Project,City of West Hollywood 0 USC Student Housing Project,City of Los Angeles 9; Wilshire Boulevard Commercial Project,City of Beverly Hills 4 Florence Avenue Mixed-Use Project, Florence-Firestone IN Whittier Supportive Housing II Project, East Los Angeles PUBLIC FACILITIES ■ Fire Station Generator Upgrade Categorical Exclusion,City of Oxnard 0 Coptic Orthodox Church Project,City of Chino Hills aM New Buddhist Temple Project,City of Chino Hills PERMITTING AND COMPLIANCE EXPERIENCE • Salvation Army Camp Mount Crags Coastal Development Permit, Los Angeles County • Cherry Canyon Citizen's Trail,City of La Canada Flintridge LONG-RANGE PLANNING Y Palm Desert General Plan Update,City of Palm Desert a Downtown Bakersfield High Speed Rail Station Area Plan EIR,City of Bakersfield r La Verne Wilderness Area Master Plan EIR,City of La Verne r University of La Verne Master Plan EIR,City of La Verne B Agreement No. 5527 Rincon Consultants,Inc. Environmental Scientists • Planners • Engineers Jennifer Pezda, MESM ASSOCIATE PLANNER py SII, Jennifer Pezda is an environmental planner for Rincon's Environmental Sciences and Planning group responsible for managing and preparing California Environmental �I^t l pliii' Quality Act(CEQA)and National Environmental Protection Act(NEPA)documentation and technical impact analyses for a variety of projects. Her experience includes work I I on southern California projects, particularly construction projects within Los Angeles lillw!¢„QN ; County;tracking and analysis of General Plan and Climate Action Plan development; environmental analysis of large-scale renewable energy(solar)projects,and biological monitoring of transmission line projects traversing Los Angeles County. M.E.S.M.,Corporate b'Il i l Environmental Management; University of California Santa Project Experience Barbara B.A.,Environmental 3200 E. Foothill Boulevard EIR,City of Pasadena � Science/Policy;University of ° 7985 Santa Monica Boulevard Project EIR,City of West Hollywood California San Diego Williamson Rock/Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail Project EIR,Angeles National Forest k ;I'`I'° w Central Basin Municipal Water District Recycled Water Project MND, Los Angeles California Association of County Environmental Professionals- W Barren Ridge Renewable Transmission Line Project EIR,Angeles National Forest Board Member Belridge Water Storage District Solar Project CEQA, Kern County '” West Basin Municipal Water District CEQA-Palos Verdes Recycled Water Pipeline Project —present) � prConsultants,Inc.(2016 Aqua Housing Projec CEQA,City of Santa Ana es Rincon Consultants,Inc.(April 2017-present) Aspen Environmental Group (2016-2017) Southern California Gas Company(2015-2016) mmm �m� (IIII IA Agreement No. 5527 Rincon Consultants,Inc. Environmental Scientists•Planners•Engineers Meagan Szromba, MA, RPA ASSOCIATE ARCHAEOLOGIST Meagan Szromba is an archaeologist with extensive experience conducting cultural resources studies in California.She has performed a full range of archaeological and historical studies in Southern and Central California. Ms.Szromba has a Master's Degree in Public Archaeology,and has specialized training and experience performing archaeological excavations, monitoring, mitigation and data recovery,surveys,site documentation,and site evaluation.She has prepared numerous cultural resources reports and technical studies for clients throughout California,and has worked closely with Native American communities to protect and mitigate impacts to cultural resources. M.A.,Public Archaeology, California State University, PROJECT EXEPRIENCE Northridge,2016 Native American Coordination Assistance for the Santa Felicia Dam Project, Lake B.A.,Anthropology,California Piru,California(2017)—Client: United Water Conservation District State University,Long Beach, 2013 "' Cultural Resources Technical Study for the United Water Conservation District Recycled Water Pipelines Project, Oxnard, California(2017)—Client: United Water Conservation District Registered Professional " Archaeological Site Testing, Excavation,and Mitigation Planning for the Goleta Archaeologist,ID#:41783154 Extended Phase I Project,Goleta,California(2017)—Client:SoCal Gas • Background Review and Evaluation of Resources for the South Coast Botanic Gardens Project, Palos Verdes,California(2017)—Client:South Coast Botanic Society for California Garden Foundation Archaeology Member "' Archaeological Curation Coordination for the Medea Creek Restoration Project, Agoura Hills,California (2016)—Client: City of Agoura Hills tl Ir V V ■ Cultural Resources Investigation for the Jed Smith Pipeline Replacement Project, Rincon Consultants,Inc.(2015 Hidden Hills,California(2016)—Client: MNS Engineers, Inc. through present) Cultural Resources Study for the Beverly Hills Media Center Environmental Totah Archaeological Project Impact Report, Beverly Hills,California(2016)—Client:City of Beverly Hills (2014 through 2015) W Phase I Cultural Resources Study for the Belridge and Berrenda Mesa Project, Anthropological Research Kern County,California(2016)—Client:SolarCity Institute(2015) M Archaeological Resources Technical Evaluation for the Artesia Live II Project, Autry National Center(2014) Artesia,California(2016)—Client:Willdan Engineering Los Angeles County 8 Section 106 Compliance for the Westpark Community Center Improvements Department of Parks and Project,Ventura,California(2016)—Client: City of Ventura Recreation(2014) William S.Hart Museum(2012 `" Cultural Resources Technical Study for the Semitropic Water Storage District through 2014) Tulare Lake Storage and Floodwater Protection Project, Kings and Kern County, California(2016)—Client: RMC Water and Environment a Update to County Guidelines for Archaeological Sensitivity Determinations and Permitting Requirements,Ventura,California(2016)—Client:County of Ventura ■ Cultural Resources Evaluation and Impact Assessment for the Florence Library Project, Los Angeles,California(2016)—Client:AMCAL Multi-Housing, Inc. M Archaeological Resources Impact Study for The Villas Planned Development Project,Coachella,California(2016)—Client: Michael Baker International II Agreement No. 5527 Meagan Szromba,MA, RPA, Page 2 ■ Phase II Archaeological Testing Services for the Orcutt Area Specific Plan Project,San Luis Obispo,California (2016)—Client:Ambient Communities LLC Phase II Archaeological Testing and Evaluation of the San Luis Ranch Complex,San Luis Obispo,California(2016)— Client:City of San Luis Obispo Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Peters Canyon Regional Park Management Plan,Orange,California (2016)—Client: Michael Baker International Section 106 Compliance for the Roosevelt Walker Community Center,Santa Ana,California (2016)—Client:City of Santa Ana M Environmental Impact Evaluation and Cultural Resources Study for the La Verne Master Plan Project, La Verne, California(2016)—Client:City of La Verne Archaeological Resources Evaluation for the Pothole Trailhead Parking Project, Lake Piru,California(2016)— Client: United Water Conservation District II N ull� Rincon Consultants, Inc. Environmental Scientists•Planners•Engineers l0 6 Agreement No. 5527 Biography �IIt m Mr. Ying holds over 26 years of traffic engineering and transportation planning experience, with particular emphasis on the preparation of traffic impact studies and parking studies for various development projects. He is a graduate of the University of California, Los Angeles in 1992. Mr. Ying has a background in complex operational analyses for intersections and roadway corridors and specializes in traffic flow simulations. He has prepared many Caltrans Permit Engineering Evaluation Reports (PEER) for the processing of highway improvements and has performed � numerous traffic signal timing, signal progression, and signal warrant analyses. Mr. Yin Y g is a t w licensed Traffic Engineer in the State of California, a certified Professional Transportation Planner with the Transportation Professional Certification Board, Inc., and a certified Employee Transportation Coordinator with the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Areas of Expertise Traffic Impact Studies for Environmental Caltrans Permit Engineering Evaluation O Evaluation Report(PEER)Preparation Parking Studies/Shared Parking Site Access and Internal Circulation y w IIS ro Analyses Study and Design Operational Analyses for Intersections Independent Third Party Technical f and Corridors Peer Reviews Relevant Project Experience Americana at Brand Expansion,City of Glendale,California " Mr. Ying served as Project Manager for the preparation of the traffic impact study included as art of an Addendum to the, p previously approved Final EIR. The project consisted of an approximately 140,000 square-foot retail-commercial expansion to the existing Americana at Brand and a proposed street vacation. Mr.Ying prepared weekday and weekend shared parking demand analyses and provided review of loading dock/truck maneuvering and overall circulation. The firm was integral in providing support throughout the environmental review process, including representation at the Planning Commission and City Council public hearings. The project resulted in successful approval and adoption of the proposed resolution. Talaria at Burbank Mixed Use Project,City of Burbank,California Mr. Ying conducted an independent, third party review of the Talaria at Burbank Mixed-Use project prepared by the City of Burbank's environmental consultant team. Mr.Ying reviewed all the technical traffic analyses, including project trip generation, trip distribution, traffic assignment/shifts, and traffic impact analyses associated with 24 study intersections and three neighborhood study street segments. Mr.Ying also reviewed the project mitigation measures as dl'tll6 ( "q, well as the Congestion Management Program traffic impact assessment and Caltrans freeway m' ramp queuing analyses. Mr.Ying and the LLG team is currently working with the project applicant and the City to prepare traffic signal modification design plans at three locations as well as the Caltrans required PEER document. East Los Angeles College Firestone Educational Center Project,City of South Gate,California Mr. Ying served as Project Manager for the preparation of the traffic impact study included as l s part of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Final EIR. Consultation included the P oversight of all existing and future intersection operations at over 30 local and regional study locations and the development of a comprehensive transportation mitigation program for the proposed 9,000-student satellite campus. Mr. Ying prepared the required traffic signal warrant analyses at study intersections adjacent to the site. Mr.Ying prepared all supplemental analyses in support of transportation-related Draft EIR responses to comments and provided public Agreement NO. 5527 hearing representation insupportoftheenvimnmenta| revievvandpub|icrevicwpmccoes. K8/. Ying was also part of the project's Master Planning team and provided traffic/transportation consultation during the Master Plan preparation process. The Final BR was certified and the project was approved by the Los Angeles Community College District(LACCD) Board of Trustees � in 2015. Subsequent to the approval, Mr.Ying and the LLG team worked with the environmental consultant, LA[[D, as well as the City of South Gat* and prepared the supplemental traffic assessment for this project.The project received approval and the Supplemental EIR was certified byLACCDinDecember ZU16. HoUywuodPark&0ixed'UsoRedeve|opmentPrnect,[ityof|og|mmond,Ca|ifurnia Mr. YinXsemed as Project Manager for the preparation nfthe traffic impact study included as part of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (E|K) and Final E|R. Work tasks consisted of oversight ofthe traffic impact analysis which reviewed int:/section operations for over 80 local and regional study locations in five jurisdictions and development of a comprehensive transportation mitigation program for the 238'acre site. Mr, Ying was instrumental in the preparation of transportation-related responses to comments as well as provided public hearing representation in support of the environmental review and public review processes. The project resulted inthe successful certification ofthe Final E|RinZOO9. Callrans Permit Engineering Evaluation Report(PEER)Preparation,Various Agencies,California W1/. Ying has prepared or assisted in numerous PEER for Caltrans District 7 submittal. Such projects include: 1'5 Southbound and Northbound Ramps at Koxfo/d Street inthe City ofLos Ange les, 1-10 Westbound Ramps at Soto Street in the City of Los Angeles,SR-118 Ronald Reagan Freeway Westbound Ramps atSK'27Topanga Canyon Boulevard in the unincorporated County ofLos Angeles,SR'118/SR'Z3New Los Angeles Avenue at Miller Parkwayinthe City ofMoorpark, SR-72 Whittier Boulevard at Pacific Place in the,City of Whittier,SR-23 Westlake Boulevard at US- 101 Romps in the City of Thousand Oaks, SR-60 Pomona Freeway Westbound Ramps at Crossroads Parkway North in the City of Industry, Harvey Drive and Wilson Avenue inthe City nf Glendale,1-5 Golden State Freeway Southbound Ramps at Mission Road in the City of Los Angeles, 1-5 Golden State Freeway Northbound 0#-Ramp at Daly Street in the City ufLos Angeles, 8R'72 Whittier Boulevard at Michigan Avenue in the City of Whittier, and the SR'134 Freeway Westbound Ramps atAlameda Avenue-Cordova Street inthe City ofBurbank. Independent Third Party Technical Peer Reviews,Various Agencies,California Mr.Yinghas provided independent,third party technical peer reviews for various public agencies on traffic and parking analyses prepared by other transportation consultants. Recent pee/ reviews include: Willow Springs || Project(for City of Goleta), Westar yNixed'UseViUage Project (for City of Goleta), Equinox Project(for City of Beverly Hills),Aliso Canyon Turbine Replacement Project(for the California Public Utilities Commission),Citadel Phase IV Expansion Project(for the City of Commerce), Grimes Kock Inc. Expanded Mining Facility (for City ofMoorpark), Old Town Village Mixed-Use Project (for City ofGo!eta), Heritage Ridge Residential Project (for City of Goleta), among others. Agreement No. 5527 Biography � I l Ms. Look-Jaeger has over 30 Years of experienceerience in the preparation of transportation ortation ptannin g analyses, withI particular emphasis on the preparation of environmental review analyses for various developments pursuant to the requirements rements of CEQA. Ms. Look-Jaeger specializes in t°u°s entitlement processing efforts, particularly on highly controversial projects which involve m 1 litigation. Ms. Look-Jaeger is a Principal of Team Pasadena and a licensed Traffic Engineer in the State of California. Ms. Look-Jaeger holds a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering(BSCE)degree from Marquette University with an emphasis in Transportation studies. I II II II( Areas of Expertise Traffic Impact Studies/Analyses for Parking Studies/Shared Parking Environmental Review Demand Analyses Transportation Master Planning/Site Conceptual Mitigation Planning/ ::"; uuoiouumouuuuuuuuuuuumllllllliiiii Hll' Feasibility Planning Improvement Packages Access and Circulation Planning for Regional Facility Operations and w Various Modes Analysis a 'a 1 f, i IIIA I I I� I� ° .II �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �ll�illlllllllllllllll Relevant Project Experience New Century Plan Project,Century City area of Los Angeles,California Ms. Look-Jaeger served/s as Principal-in-Charge for the preparation of the traffic and parking analyses included as part of the Draft and Final EIRs for the project proposed by Westfield, LLC which includes the development of approximately 358,000 net new square feet of retail- commercial space at the existing Westfield Shopping Center and up to 262 units of residential. The firm was integral in providing support throughout the challenging environmental review process, including pre-litigation support and prepared hundreds of responses to comments in support of the Final EIR. The traffic analysis reviewed existing and future operations for over 60 p' locations and a comprehensive mitigation program was developed. Community meeting and public hearing representation was also provided. Ms. Look-Jaeger and the LLG team continue to work closely with the Council office and various homeowner association representatives, as well as providing on-going transportation planning, parking, and traffic engineering design support. Americana at Brand (formerly Glendale Town Center),City of Glendale,California Ms. Look-Jaeger served as Principal-in-Charge for the preparation of the traffic and parking analyses in support of the EIR entitlement process. The traffic analysis reviewed existing and IIS � p Y g future operations for over 30 key and included a comprehensivere hensive mitigation ation pro ram developed in consultation with the City of Glendale. The effects of the partial street vacations were also fully analyzed in addition to the loading/unloading operations. Ms. Look-Jaeger was integral in providing support throughout the challenging environmental review process,including litigation support and preparation of hundreds of responses to comments in support of the Final EIR. Ms. Look-Jaeger also provided meeting and public hearing representation throughout the environmental review and project approval process. Hilton Garden Inn Project,City of Burbank,California Ms. Look-Jaeger served as Principal-in-Charge and oversaw the preparation of the parking analysis for the Hilton Garden Inn located in the City of Burbank. Consultation included preparation of code parking calculations, representative parking demand surveys at other Hilton facilities,and parking demand analyses for environmental review clearance. Ms. Look-Jaeger also attended meetings with City staff as well as provided public hearing representation throughout the public review process. i I I, fl''P IIII a Agreement No. 5527 u.p I u Marriott Residence Inn Project,City of Burbank,California Ms. Look-Jaeger served as Principal-in-Charge and oversaw the preparation of the parking analysis for the Marriott Residence Inn located in the City of Burbank. Consultation included V ,III pre oration of code parking calculations, parking demand surveys at otherMarriott Residence Inn facilities, and shared parking analyses for environmental review clearance. Ms. Look-Jaeger ��II � uu° I III Inhlll also attended meetings with City staff as well as provided public hearing representation U n u V throughout the public review process. East Los Angeles College South Gate Educational Center Master Plan,South Gate,California p IlI�u Im Ms. Look-Jaeger served as the Principal-in-Charge for the preparation of transportation master ^ IIIIIII planning consultation services to Berliner and Associates(the Master Architect)for the Firestone ............ „, Education Center and the planned future buildings and enrollment increases. Master planning services included a review of both near-term and long-term campus needs with respect to vehicle, Qtransit and pedestrian access and circulation systems, parking and parking facility design as well as overall connectivity both internal and external to the campus, The surrounding street system was assessed in terms of existing and anticipated future operations. Ms. Look-Jaeger oversaw the assessment of the opportunities and constraints of the system and reviewed enhanced accessibility to/from the campus via additional roadway connections to and signalization at both III major entry/exit points along Firestone Boulevard and Santa Fe Avenue. LLG also prepared the '' gg!!!!!!IG a X44!0� Iuuuuuuuuu VIII IIIIIII IIII formal traffic impact and parking analyses,for inclusion as part of the EIR for submittal to the Los 4 Angeles Community College District(LACCD). III'I'Ilmiilu lllllll�°°I� University Gateway Project-USC Campus, Los Angeles,California Ms. Look-Jaeger served as Principal-in-Charge for the preparation of the traffic and parking analyses included as part of the Draft and Final EIRs for the project which included the development of 421 residential apartments for USC student housing,ground floor retail space as well as community serving retail space. The firm was integral to providing support throughout I the challenging environmental review process, including litigation support and prepared numerous responses to comments in support of the Final EIR and throughout the litigation pIII process. Community meeting and public hearing representation was also provided. LLG is providing ongoing traffic engineering design support consultation services related to both the site �N N adjacent and off-site locations, involving signing and striping, construction detour plans, and '^ VIII IIII other miscellaneous coordination and consultation services in conjunction with the respective uV"°1°I l """„IIIIII City departments such as LADOT, BOE, DBS and the CRA. tl I iI sp I oy. wr .w I yu ,o, ull V , ;•t” �I i� I , I pnl�'o "i'''III I I Illlp �I II ills I I II i. I I V