CC RESOLUTION 4958RESOLUTION NO. 4958
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. EA -905) FOR THE EL
SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT; MAKING
FINDINGS OF FACT AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS; ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT AND GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT NO. GPA 11-
01; AND APPROVING SUBDIVISION NO. SUB 11 -02 FOR VESTING
TENTATIVE MAP NO. 71551.
The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission finds and declares that:
A. On December 8, 2011, the Raytheon Company filed an application for
Environmental Assessment No. EA -905; General Plan Amendment and
General Plan Map Amendment No. GPA 11 -01; Specific Plan No. SPA 11-
01; Zone Change and Zoning Map Amendment No. ZC 11 -02; Zone Text
Amendment No. 11 -01; Development Agreement No. 11 -02; and
Subdivision No. 11 -02 for Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 for 26 parcels
to re- designate and rezone an approximately 142 -acre property at 2000-
2100 East El Segundo Boulevard from Light Manufacturing (M -1) Zone to
El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) to establish
development standards for the site (collectively, the "project ");
B, The applications were reviewed by the City of El Segundo Planning and
Building Safety Department for, in part, consistency with the General Plan
and conformity with the El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC ");
C. In addition, the City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under the
California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et
seq., "CEQA "), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of
Regulations § §15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines "), and the City's
Environmental Guidelines (City Council Resolution No. 3805, adopted
March 16, 1993);
D, An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared pursuant to the
requirements of CEQA Guidelines § 15161;
E, The Planning and Building Safety Department completed its review and
scheduled a public hearing regarding the application before the Planning
Commission for February 12, 2015;
F. On February 12, 2015, the Commission held a public hearing to receive
public testimony and other evidence regarding the applications including,
Be
without limitation, information provided to the Commission by City staff and
public testimony, and representatives of the Raytheon Company and
continued the item;
G. On October 22, 2015, the Commission reopened the continued public
hearing on the item to receive additional information regarding project
revisions, in particular changes to the Development Agreement public
benefits. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. 2765 recommending that the City Council certify the
Project's EIR; and adopt the General Plan Amendment and General Plan
Map Amendment, Specific Plan, Zone Change and Zoning Map
Amendment; approve the Subdivision for Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551;
and disapprove the draft Development Agreement ;
H. On November 17, 2015, the City Council held a duly advertised public
hearing in the Council Chamber of the El Segundo City Hall, 350 Main
Street to receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the
applications including, without limitation, information provided to the Council
by City Staff, public testimony, and representatives of the Raytheon
Company;
On December 1, 2015 the City Council reopened the continued public
hearing on the item to receive additional information regarding project
revisions the Council directed staff and the applicant to make; and
J. This Resolution and its findings are made based upon the testimony and
evidence presented to the City Council at its December 1, 2015 public
hearing including, without limitation, the staff report submitted by the
Planning and Building Safety Department.
SECTION 2: Factual Findings and Conclusions. The City Council finds that the following
facts exist:
A. The project site is located at 2000 -2100 East El Segundo Boulevard in the
southeast quadrant of the City of El Segundo;
B. The project site is a level 142 -acre site located south of East El Segundo
Boulevard, in the block between South Sepulveda Boulevard and South
Douglas Street;
C. The surrounding land uses are primarily low and high -rise office buildings
to the north (CO and MU -N Zones); a City retention basin and light industrial
uses to the south (M -1 and O -S Zones); light industrial uses and the
elevated Metro Green Line track and station to the east (M -1 Zone); and
SCE high voltage transmission lines, municipal golf course, and West Basin
Municipal Water District facility (O -S and P -F Zones) to the west;
®2�
D. The project site is currently developed with the Raytheon Company's Space
and Airborne Systems (SAS) facility. There is currently 1,802,513 net
square feet (2,089,000 million gross square feet) of development in 11
buildings and 6,873 parking spaces located in 20 surface lots on the site.
The floor area ratio (FAR) of current development on the site is 0.29;
E. Existing development on the project site was originally approved in 1978
through Precise Plan #3 -78 that allowed for 2,575,000 square feet of
development. The original precise plan was modified through numerous
amendments and a precise plan map was established in 1983. The last
amendment to the precise plan (Ordinance No. 1103) occurred in 1987. The
existing entitlement allows for 2,017,903 net square feet of total
development, which is 215,390 net square -feet in development more than
the existing development on the site. The allowable FAR under the current
entitlement is approximately 0.325;
F, When the original precise plan for the project site was approved, the
underlying zoning was Commercial- Manufacturing (C -M). At that time, the
C -M Zone did not have a maximum FAR development standard. By 1988,
the C -M Zone had a maximum FAR requirement of 1.0. In the early 1990s
the project site was re -zoned Light Industrial (M -1), which limits FAR to 0.6;
G, The project is a mixed -use concept allowing for flexibility regarding the
location and density of development within the specific plan area. The
Specific Plan has mechanisms to allow the transfer of land use types and
density within the plan area;
H. The overall development within the Specific Plan area cannot exceed an
FAR of 0.60, based on the 142.2 gross acre size of the project site. This
would allow for a maximum of 1,930,000 net square feet of new
development on the project site and a total maximum development (both
existing and new) of 3,718,889 net square feet;
Development standards for allowable uses have been developed for the
Specific Plan and all uses within the Plan area must be compliant. The
allowed uses identified in the development standards include: Office,
Financial Institutions, Light Industrial Uses, Research and Development,
Movie and Entertainment Facilities, Data Centers, Storage and
Warehousing, Health Clubs, Recreational Facilities, Restaurants and
Cafes, Retail and Hotels (subject to existing deed restrictions);
J. The total number of traffic trips for new development in the project area
cannot exceed the trip ceiling established in the Specific Plan. The trip
ceiling for new development consists of 3,120 new p.m. peak hour trips (631
p.m. peak hour inbound trips, and 2,489 p.m. peak hour outbound trips),
3,042 a.m. new peak hour trips (2,634 a.m. inbound trips and 408 a.m.
outbound trips) and 26,585 total new daily trips;
K. The proposed General Plan re- designation and rezoning of the Project Site
would change the General Plan land use designation from Light Industrial
to the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) land use
designation and rezone the area from the Light Manufacturing (M -1) Zone
to the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) Zone;
L. The ESSCSP contains three land use designations. These are:
Commercial /Office Mixed Use (CMU), Office /Industrial Mixed Use (0/1 MU)
and Open Space /Recreation (OS /REC). The CMU designation applies to
six parcels comprised of 24 acres. THE 0/1 MU designation applies to 11
parcels consisting of 86.6 acres and the OS /REC designation includes 6
parcels consisting of 12 acres. Three un -zoned parcels consisting of 13.6
acres in area are designated as public or private roadways;
M. The project application included a site plan illustrating a Conceptual
Development Scenario. The Conceptual Development Scenario contains
the following components: 1,788,889 net square feet of existing
development, 133,000 net square feet of new retail development, 82,000
net square feet of new warehouse development, 150,000 net square feet of
new light industrial development, 1,565,000 net square feet of new office
development and a 7.54 -acre private outdoor recreational facility;
N. The Project includes a 100 -foot wide new public roadway on the east side
of the Project site that will connect Nash Street to South Hughes Way. The
applicant will be required to construct and dedicate this roadway to the City
before occupying any building that produces new traffic trips beyond the trip
ceiling of 89 new a.m. peak period trips or 225 p.m. peak period trips;
O, The Project includes completion of a 4th eastbound travel lane on El
Segundo Boulevard along the entire frontage of the Specific Plan area. The
applicant is required to construct this roadway improvement as parcels with
frontage on El Segundo Boulevard are constructed;
P. The Project includes requirements to extend Continental Boulevard to be a
publicly accessible roadway if non - Raytheon users occupy buildings
adjacent to that roadway;
Q. The Project includes the construction of a six -foot wide Class I bicycle path
adjacent or near El Segundo Boulevard. The Project also includes Class II
bicycle lanes in the roadway of the Nash Street extension;
R. The Project includes a $75,000 payment towards construction of bicycle
parking facilities at or adjacent to the Metro Green Line El Segundo Station.
-4-
The Project also includes a requirement that a pedestrian access walkway
be provided on the eastern side of the project area to provide access to the
Metro Green Line Station;
S. The Project includes a 20 -year offer to dedicate Parcels 20 and 22 of
Vesting Map No. 71551 to allow a potential future roadway connection from
the Nash Street extension to Coral Circle. A 20 -year offer to dedicate Parcel
26 is also included in the project to allow potential future roadway access to
the east side of the City municipal golf- course if the Continental Boulevard
roadway becomes publicly accessible;
T. The Project includes a provision to allow the applicant to connect to the
existing City sewer line in El Segundo Boulevard if a contribution of 25% of
the cost, up to a maximum of $375,000, of up- grading that sewer line to
increase capacity is paid to the City of El Segundo at the time the City
awards the project but not later than December 31, 2018;
U. The Project conditions require the Applicant to allow access to the 7.54 -
acre recreational area identified on Parcel 11 if more than 28.44 acres of
the plan area is sold to non - Raytheon users. In addition, the Applicant must
record a 20 -year offer of dedication of the 7.54 acre recreation /open space
area to the City of El Segundo, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for
future potential park purposes in accordance with the Development
Agreement if located on any of the lots (Parcel 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 13 or 14 of
Vesting Map No. 71551) outside the Raytheon security fenced perimeter;
V. The Project provides that the applicant would pay the City one $500,000
installment and five $700,000 installments for the City's General Fund to be
made annually starting on March 31, 2016 and ending on March 31, 2021.
These revised payments cannot be used as credit against future
development impact fees. The six required payments result in a total of
$4,000,000 in new General Fund revenue;
W, The Project provides that the applicant would pay the City an additional
$5,000,000 if the Nash Street road extension is not completed within 10
years after the project is approved. If the Nash Street roadway extension is
not completed within 10 years, the City will receive a total of $9,000,000 in
new General Fund revenue through direct payments from the applicant; and
X. The Project provides that the applicant would pay the City a $.50 per square
foot fee for all future development on the site. Future revenue collected from
this fee would go to the City's General Fund and could be used for any
purpose the City chooses.
�5-
SECTION 3: Environmental Assessment. The City Council makes the following
environmental findings:
A. The City completed a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for this
project. A noticed Public Scoping meeting was held on November 5, 2012
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15083. A Notice of Preparation of the DEIR
was circulated for public review from October 29, 2012 to November 28,
2012 pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15082. A Notice of Completion for the
DEIR was filed with the State Office of Planning and Research on July 14,
2014 pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15085. The public comment and
review period for the DEIR was open between July 14, 2014 and August 27,
2014 in compliance with CEQA Guidelines §15087;
B. The Final EIR, which is attached as Exhibit "H," and incorporated by
reference, was reviewed by the City Council and the information contained
in the Final EIR was considered by the City Council before approving or
denying the project in accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15090;
C. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15090 the Final EIR reflects the City's
independent judgment and analysis. The City Council has independently
reviewed and analyzed the Draft EIR prepared for the Project. The Draft
EIR is an accurate and complete statement of the potential environmental
impacts of the project. The Final EIR was prepared under the City's direction
and reflects its independent judgment and analysis of the environmental
impacts and comments received on the Draft EIR;
D. The Draft EIR generally identifies, for each potentially significant impact of
the project, one or more corresponding mitigation measures to reduce
impacts to a level of insignificance, with the exception of air quality and
noise impacts. The City Council finds that nearly all of the potentially
significant impacts identified in the Draft EIR are mitigated by corresponding
mitigation measures to the extent set forth in the Draft EIR;
E. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15091, the City Council has
considered written findings regarding each of the significant environmental
effects identified in the DEIR before certifying the Final EIR. Each finding
includes a rationale of how mitigation measures have lessened identified
significant environmental effects to a less than significant level for those
effects that have been identified as mitigatable. For the four environmental
effects that have been identified in the DEIR as not mitigatable to a less
than significant level (Land Use and Planning, Transportation and Traffic,
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions), the findings provide a
rationale on how proposed mitigation measures have substantially lessened
these four environmental effects;
M
F. The DEIR states that the City Council must adopt a Statement of Overriding
Consideration if it wishes to approve the project. In accordance with CEQA
Guidelines §15093 a Statement of Overriding Consideration was included
in the project's record for City Council consideration. This statement
identifies specific reasons why to support approval of the project based on
information in the EIR and in the project's record; and
G. The specific issues included in the Statement of Overriding Considerations
considered by the City Council are: a) The Project will help foster economic
development, business retention, municipal tax base and job creation in the
City; b) The Project provides the opportunity for the City's largest employer
to grow and expand operations within the City; c) Project approval will
trigger one annual payment of $500,000 and five subsequent annual
payments of $700,000 towards the City's General Fund for a total of
$4,000,000 that can be used by the City for any purpose; d) If the Nash
Street Extension roadway improvements are not completed within 10 years
of project approval, then the applicant would pay the City an additional
$5,000,000; e) An additional fee of $.50 per square foot of new development
is required to be paid as development of the project occurs (resulting in
$1,000,000 if the conceptual plan is fully built); f) Roadway improvements
consistent with the General Plan will result from the Project; g) Bicycle and
Pedestrian network improvements will be constructed as part of the project;
h) Increased density at the project location is consistent with regional growth
strategies, such as the SCAG Compass Blueprint Growth Vision Program;
and i) The project could result in potential benefits such as access to
additional land for roadway links, potential for the City to accept land for a
new public park and a monetary contribution, up to $375,000, to City sewer
improvements.
Section 4: General Plan and Specific Plan. If approved, the project conforms to the City's
General Plan, with the exception of Circulation Element policies C1 -1.2, C1-
1.5, and C1 -1.10. The statement of overriding considerations finds that the
public benefits resulting from the Project overcomes the inability to comply with
these three Circulation Element policies. Conformance with the rest of the
General Plan and the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan is as follows:
A. Following a General Plan Amendment, the General Plan Land Use
Designation of the project site would be "El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan (ESSCSP)." This designation is intended to create a plan area
that is a flexible mixed -use concept. The Specific Plan contains
mechanisms that allow the transfer of land use types and density within the
plan area. As conditioned, the proposed project is compatible with the
General Plan with the exception of the previously cited Circulation Element
policies.
IVA
B. The General Plan contains a number of relevant Goals, Objectives, and
Policies in the Land Use Element. Implementation of the proposed project
is consistent with Land Use Element Policy LU4 -1.1 to "require landscaping,
its maintenance and permanent upkeep on all new commercial
development." The Specific Plan requires a Master Landscape Concept
Plan to be submitted before any development occurs in the Specific Plan
area and all development will be reviewed to ensure consistency with this
Master Landscape Plan.
C. The proposed project is consistent with Land Use Element Policies LU4 -3.2
to encourage mixed -use developments within one quarter mile of Green
Line Stations "; LU4 -4.4 to "promote commercial uses, in conjunction with
other uses, in buildings within a quarter -mile walking radius of the Green
Line stations "; LU4 -4.6 to "promote mixed -use development near transit
nodes and encourage modes of transportation that do not require an
automobile "; and LU4 -4.8 to "develop guidelines for mixed -use, high
intensity nodes within a quarter mile walking radius of the Green Line
stations." There is an existing Metro Green Line Station adjacent to the
northeast corner of the Project site and much of the plan area is within a
quarter mile of this station. The Specific Plan allows for a mix of commercial
uses to be developed at locations within a quarter mile of the Metro Green
Line Station and includes design guidelines and design features that
encourage walking and other alternative means of transportation to the
Metro Green -Line Station. The majority of existing development on the
project site within a quarter mile of this Metro Green Line station is surface
parking.
D. The proposed project is consistent with Land Use Element Objective LU4 -
4 to "provide areas where development has the flexibility to mix uses, in an
effort to provide synergistic relationships which have the potential to
maximize economic benefit, reduce traffic impacts, and encourage
pedestrian environments." The Specific Plan allows for a range of
commercial uses and includes mechanisms allowing for the flexible transfer
of uses and density to different locations within the Specific Plan area. The
site is currently developed with little integration into the surrounding area
and City street network. The site is currently developed with limited uses
and has no support retail services and other commercial uses mixed in with
the site's existing office, industrial and research and development uses. The
development standards and allowed uses in the Specific Plan will allow for
a more flexible use of the site and allow for the mixing of uses. The Specific
Plan also has requirements for new pedestrian and traffic improvements.
E. The proposed project is consistent with Land Use Element Policy LU6 -1.1
to "continue to provide uniform and high quality park and recreational
opportunities to all areas of the City, for use by residents and employees."
The existing Raytheon South Campus provides a large recreational facility
F-11
for use by employees, which provides an amenity to employees and also
reduces demand for the use of City recreational facilities. The Specific Plan
will continue to provide a large outdoor recreational facility to Raytheon
Employees and potentially to other employees located within the plan area.
The project also provides an opportunity in the future for the City to obtain
land for a public park.
F. The proposed project is consistent with Land Use Element Policy LU7 -1.2
that "no new development shall be allowed unless adequate public facilities
are in place or provided for." The utility and public service requirements for
the project were evaluated as part of the environmental review process. The
required environmental mitigation measures for utilities and services as well
as collection of required impact mitigation fees will ensure adequate public
facilities are in place or provided.
G. The proposed project is consistent with Land Use Element Policy LU7 -1.4
that "storm drain and flood control facilities shall be maintained throughout
the City to protect residents and structures from an anticipated 50 -year
flood." The project application included a proposed drainage system and
the EIR analysis of this system concluded that the project will not result in
any net increase in storm water discharge. Compliance with the required
environmental mitigation measures for hydrology and water quality will
ensure compliance with General Plan flood - proofing requirements.
H, The proposed project is consistent with some, but not all, Circulation
Element Objectives and Policies based upon a Traffic Study performed for
the project. The project is inconsistent with Circulation Element Policies C1-
1.2 to "pursue implementation of all Circulation Element policies such that
all Master Plan roadways are upgraded and maintained at acceptable levels
of service "; C1 -1.5 to "Implement roadway and intersection upgrades to full
Circulation Element standards when needed to improve traffic operating
conditions and to serve development "; and C1 -1.10 to "ensure that new
roadway links are constructed as designated in the Master Plan and link
with existing roadways with the City such that efficient operation of the
circulation system is maintained at an operating Level of Service "D" or
better." The Traffic Study determined that the proposed project would
generate 26,585 new daily trips with 3,042 new AM peak hour, and 3,120
new PM peak hour trips. The project has significant impacts at 16 of the 71
studied intersections and these impacts do not have feasible mitigation.
Project approval requires the City Council to adopt a Statement of
Overriding Considerations.
The proposed project is consistent with Circulation Element Policy C1 -1.3
to "provide adequate roadway capacity on all Master Plan roadways" and
C1 -1.5 to "pursue and protect adequate right -of -way to accommodate future
circulation system improvements." The project involves improvements on
In
three roadways: El Segundo Boulevard; Nash Street and Continental
Boulevard. The roadways improvements will be constructed in compliance
with Circulation Element standards for each applicable roadway
classification and will provide right of ways consistent with Circulation
Element Exhibit C -10, the City's Master Plan of Streets.
J. The project is consistent with Circulation Element Policy C1 -1.4 to
"construct missing roadway links to complete the roadway system
designated in the Circulation Element when needed to improve traffic
operating conditions and to serve development." The Nash Street extension
will result in a north -south roadway in the southeastern quadrant of the City,
which is identified as a Future Transportation Corridor in the Circulation
Element and noted on the City's Master Plan of Streets (Circulation Element
Exhibit C -10) as circulation "to be developed in conjunction with land
development."
K. The project is consistent with Circulation Element Policy C1 -1.6 to "ensure
that planned intersection improvements are constructed as designated in
Exhibit C -9 to achieve efficient operation of the circulation system at a Level
of Service "D" or better where feasible," All feasible intersection
improvements have been identified and are required to be completed as
part of the project conditions of approval and mitigation measures. The
required intersection improvements do not conflict with the improvements
identified in Circulation Element Exhibit C -9.
L, The project is consistent with Circulation Element Policy C1 -1.7 to "provide
adequate intersection capacity to the extent feasible on Major, Secondary
and Collector Arterials to maintain LOS D and to prevent diversion of
through traffic into local residential streets." All feasible intersection
improvements to increase capacitor on Major, Secondary and Collector
Arterials are included as project conditions of approval and mitigation
measures. Given the project location in the southeast quadrant of the City,
which is located away from the City's residential areas, and as identified in
the EIR, the Project will not divert through traffic to City of El Segundo
residential streets.
M. The project is consistent with Circulation Element Policy C2 -1.1 to
"encourage the development of pedestrian linkages to and from the Metro
Green Line stations to encourage and attract intermodal transit/walking
trips" and Policy C2-1 .3 to "encourage new developments in the City to
participate in the development of the city -wide system of pedestrian
walkways and require participation funded by the project developer where
appropriate, "' The construction of a pedestrian walkway on the east side of
the project area is required to provide convenient pedestrian access to the
Green Line El Segundo Station located adjacent to El Segundo Boulevard.
-10-
N. The project is consistent with Circulation Element Policy C2 -2.8 to "evaluate
bikeway system links with the Metro Green Line rail stations and improve
access wherever feasible." The Project is required to add a new eastbound
Class I bicycle path to El Segundo Boulevard and an easement on the east
side of the project area for direct bicycle access into the Metro Green Line
El Segundo Station, which will improve bicycle access to the station.
O. The project is consistent with Circulation Element Policy C2 -3.10 to
"encourage the MTA to provide bike storage facilities at the Metro Green
Line rail stations." The developer is required to pay $75,000 towards
construction of bicycle parking facilities at or adjacent to the Green Line El
Segundo Station.
P„ The project is consistent with Economic Development Element Policies
ED1 -2.1 to "expand El Segundo's retail and commercial base so that the
diverse needs of the City's business and residential communities are met"
and ED1 -2.2 to "Maintain and promote land uses that improve the City's tax
base, balancing economic development and quality of life goals." The
Project will add retail and commercial uses at the site, replace existing
surface parking lots, increase the City's tax base and add new jobs.
Q. The project is consistent with Economic Development Element Policy ED1-
2.3 to "balance the City's economic development program with the City's
resources and infrastructure capacity." The Project will result in
improvements to the City's roadway network and could potentially result in
improved sewer infrastructure in El Segundo Boulevard. The EIR for the
project evaluated utilities and public services and found that City resources
and infrastructure capacity can meet the needs of this Project.
R. The project is consistent with Open Space Element Objective OS 1 -2 to
"preserve existing and support acquisition of additional private park and
recreation facilities to foster recognition of their value as community
recreation and open space resources." The Project includes the
preservation of existing private recreational facilities through relocation of
these facilities within the Specific Plan area. The Project also has the
potential to expand the user base of these recreational facilities to
employers other than Raytheon.
S. The project is consistent with Recreation Element Goal OS1 to "provide and
maintain high quality open space and recreational facilities that meet the
needs of the existing and future residents and employees within the City of
El Segundo." The project maintains high quality open space and
recreational facilities for employees working within the Specific Plan area.
T. The project is consistent with Air Quality Objective AQ3 -1 to "increase the
proportion of work trips made by transit." The project will increase
-11-
development intensity around an existing Metro Green Line Light Rail
Station, consistent with the SCAG RTP /SCS regional mobility plan and the
SCAG Compass Blueprint planning policy document.
U. The project is consistent with Air Quality Policy AQ 4 -1.1 to "actively
encourage the development and maintenance of a high quality network of
pedestrian and bicycle routes, linked to key locations, in order to promote
non - motorized transportation." The project includes a new bicycle path on
El Segundo Boulevard and new bicycle lanes in the Nash Street extension.
These new bicycle facilities are consistent with the South Bay Bicycle Plan
and will provide better access to the Metro Green Line Light Rail Station
adjacent to the site. A new pedestrian easement providing direct access to
the Metro Green Line Light Rail Station is also included in the project.
V, The project is consistent with Noise Element Program N1-2.1 A to "address
noise impacts in all environmental documents for discretionary approval
projects, to insure that noise sources meet City Noise Ordinance standards.
These source may include: mechanical or electrical equipment, truck
loading areas, or outdoor speaker systems." The EIR for the project fully
evaluated project noise impacts. The EIR identifies that noise impacts can
be fully mitigated.
SECTION 5: Subdivision. The City Council cannot make any of the findings for denial set
forth in ESMC § 14 -1 -6 for the following reasons:
A. The proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans
as specified in Government Code § 65451. This project generally meets the
goals and objectives of the General Plan and it is consistent with the El
Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. Vesting Tentative Map (VTM) No.
71551 proposes 26 new lots. The proposed lots vary in size and meet the
minimum lot size requirements established in the El Segundo South
Campus Specific Plan.
B. The design of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general
and specific plans. This project meets the goals and objectives of the
General Plan with the exception of three Circulation Element policies.
Approval of the project relies on a Statement of Overriding Considerations
for the subject Circulation Element policies.
C. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development in that
the proposed lots meet the size and dimension requirements to allow the
subdivision of the existing project site. The previous land use designation
was Light Industrial and the zoning designation for the property was Light
Industrial (M -1). The new El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan allows
for the continued operation of the existing office /manufacturing facility and
allows for expanded commercial and office development that is consistent
-12-
with existing development surrounding the Project area.
D, The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. The
proposed project involves subdivision of an approximately 142 acre project
site into 26 parcels. The proposed maximum development density is a 0.6
Floor Area Ratio (FAR). This density is consistent with the El Segundo
South Campus Specific Plan. This density is also generally in conformance
with the maximum FAR allowed in the M -1 Zone, the previous zoning
designation of the site. Each new lot will meet or exceed the minimum size
and dimension requirements.
E, The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is unlikely to
cause substantial damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat. The proposed project site is currently improved with
approximately 2,089,948 gross square feet of existing Raytheon Company
office, industrial and warehouse development, an outdoor recreational area,
and 6,873 parking spaces in approximately 20 surface parking lots. The
project site is also predominately surrounded by developed urban land
permanently altered with buildings, roads and hardscape. There are no fish
or wildlife habitats on the site that could be damaged by the proposed
subdivision or new development.
F. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements, acquired by
the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision. The proposed subdivision is not anticipated to conflict with any
known easements located at or near the property. The proposed parcel
configuration on the site has been oriented to avoid conflicts with existing
easements, such as the existing Metro Green Line elevated rail alignment.
SECTION 6: Approvals.
A, Subject to the conditions listed on attached Exhibit "A," which are
incorporated into this Resolution by reference, the City Council certifies the
Final Environmental Impact Report of Environmental Impacts for
Environmental Assessment No. EA -905 as set forth in Exhibit "H "; makes
findings of fact and adopts a Statement of Overriding Considerations as set
forth in Exhibit "G," which are incorporated by reference; and approves
General Plan Amendment and General Plan Map Amendment No. GPA 11-
01 and Subdivision No. SUB 11 -02 for Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551.
B. The City Council amends the Land Use Plan ( "Land Use Designations —
Commercial Designations" subsection) of the Land Use Element of the
General Plan to reflect the addition of the El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan, including a description of the allowed uses and the maximum
land use density allowed. The corresponding changes are set forth in
attached Exhibit "B," which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference.
-13-
C. The City Council amends the Land Use Plan ( "Southeast Quadrant"
subsection) of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to reflect the
change of the Project area at 2000 -2100 East El Segundo Boulevard from
Light Industrial to El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. The
corresponding changes are set forth in attached Exhibit "C," which is
incorporated into this Resolution by reference.
D. The City Council amends the 1992 General Plan Summary of Existing
Trends Buildout (Exhibit LU -3) of the Land Use Element to reflect the
change of the Project area at 2000 -2100 East El Segundo Boulevard from
Light Industrial to El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. The
corresponding changes to the Land Use Element are set forth in attached
Exhibit "D," which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference.
E. The City Council amends the General Plan Land Use Map to reflect the
change of the Project area at 2000 -2100 East El Segundo Boulevard from
Light Industrial to El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP). The
corresponding changes to the Land Use Map are set forth in attached
Exhibit "E," which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference.
F. The City Council, in accordance with the requirements of Public Resources
Code § §21081(a) and 21081.6, adopts a Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program (MMRP) as set forth in attached Exhibit "F," which is
incorporated into this Resolution by reference. The City Council adopts
each of the mitigation measures expressly set forth in the MMRP as
conditions of approval of the Project.
G. The City Council approves Vesting Tentative Map (VTM) No. 71551 (a 26
lot subdivision map) attached as Exhibit "I," which is incorporated into this
Resolution by reference.
SECTION 7: Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and determinations
in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence,
both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project.
The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and
determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and
completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.
SECTION 8: Limitations. The City Council's analysis and evaluation of the project is
based on the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in
evaluating a project that absolute and perfect knowledge of all possible
aspects of the project will not exist. One of the major limitations on analysis
of the project is the City Council's lack of knowledge of future events. In all
instances, best efforts have been made to form accurate assumptions.
Somewhat related to this are the limitations on the City's ability to solve
-14-
what are in effect regional, state, and national problems and issues. The
City must work within the political framework within which it exists and with
the limitations inherent in that framework.
SECTION 9: Summaries of Information. All summaries of information in the findings,
which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the
record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an
indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.
SECTION 10: This Resolution will remain effective until superseded by a subsequent
resolution.
SECTION 11: A copy of this Resolution must be mailed to the Raytheon Company, and
to any other person requesting a copy.
SECTION 12: This Resolution is the City Council's final decision and will become effective
immediately upon adoption.
Resolution No. 4958 was PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of
December, 2015.
ATTEST:
Tracy We
aver, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
'Mark D. Hens[ y, ty Attorney
taZue te Mayor
-15-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 1
I, Tracy Weaver, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole
number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No.
4958 was duly passed, approved and adopted by said City Council at a regular meeting held on the
15th day of December, 2015, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk,
by the following vote:
AYES: Mayor Fuentes, Mayor Pro Tern Jacobson, Council Member Atkinson, Council
Member Fellhauer, Council Member Dugan
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
WITNESS MY HAND THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF SAID CITY this 6th day of December, 2016.
rac Weaver, ('rty '6r
of tfic City of El SCgLl 1c10,'
California
-16-
Refer to City Council Agenda Packet from December 15, 2015, Item #2 - for the Exhibits
referenced in Resolution No. 4958.
Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval
Exhibit B — General Plan Land Use Designations subsection
Exhibit C — General Plan Land Use Plan Southeast Quadrant Subsection
Exhibit D — 1992 General Plan Summary of Existing Trends Build -out
Exhibit E — General Plan Land Use Map Amendment
Exhibit F — Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Exhibit G — Environmental Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Exhibt H — Final Environmental Impact Report
Exhibit I — Vesting Tentative Map (VTM) No. 71551
Refer to link below:
ttp: / /eIsegundo.or de is /elected /a er das.as
A paper copy of the Exhibits mentioned above is available in the City Clerk's
office for viewing only.
-16-
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 4958 EXHIBIT A
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 1516 EXHIBIT D
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
In addition to all applicable provisions of the El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC "), the
Raytheon Company, agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the
City of El Segundo's approval of Environmental Impact Report for Environmental
Assessment No. EA -905, General Plan Amendment and General Plan Map Amendment
No. GPA 11 -01, Specific Plan No. SP 11 -01, Zone Change and Zoning Map Amendment
No. ZC 11 -01, Zone Text Amendment No. ZTA 11 -01, Development Agreement No. DA
11 -02, and Subdivision No. SUB 11 -02 for Vesting Tentative Map (VTM) No. 71551
( "Project Conditions ").
Before building permits are issued, the applicant must obtain all the
necessary approvals, licenses and permits and pay all the
appropriate fees as required by the City.
2, The applicant must comply with all mitigation measures identified in
the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project. A
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) was prepared
as part of the environmental review for the project and is attached as
Exhibit "F" to this Resolution. The mitigation measures of the MMRP
are incorporated into these conditions of approval by reference. All
mitigation measures and conditions of approval must be listed on the
plans submitted for plan check and the plans for which a building
permit is issued.
3. Before the City issues building permits located on sites within the
ESSCSP, the applicant must submit site specific landscape and
irrigation plans to the Planning and Building Safety Department and
the Parks and Recreation Department for review and approval to
demonstrate compliance with the City's Water Conservation
regulations and Guidelines for Water Conservation in Landscaping
(ESMC § §10 -2 -1, et seq.). The landscaping and irrigation must be
completely installed before the City issues a final Certificate of
Occupancy.
4. The applicant must build the Nash Street roadway extension and
associated public improvements in accordance with Section 7.1 of
the Development Agreement. The design and construction of the
Nash Street roadway extension is subject to review and approval by
-1_
the Director of Public Works and Director of Planning and Building
Safety,
5. The applicant must cooperate with the City in creation of a
landscaping and lighting assessment district for the Nash Street
Extension in accordance with Section 7.1.6 of the Development
Agreement.
6. The applicant must build the Continental Boulevard Roadway
Extension in accordance with the El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan and Section 7.2 of the Development Agreement.
7. The applicant must cooperate with the City in creation of a
landscaping and lighting assessment district for the Continental
Boulevard Extension in accordance with Section 7.2.5 of the
Development Agreement if a dedication of the Continental Boulevard
roadway extension and associated improvements is accepted by the
City.
8. The applicant must record a 20 -year irrevocable offer of dedication
of Parcel 26 of Tentative Vesting Map No. 71551 in accordance with
the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan and Section 7.2.6 of
the Development Agreement. Before recordation, the irrevocable
offer to dedicate must be reviewed and approved by the Director of
Planning and Building Safety, the Director of Public Works and the
City Attorney.
9. The applicant must complete the El Segundo Boulevard roadway
and associated right -of -way improvements in accordance with
Section 7.3 of the Development Agreement. The design and
construction of the El Segundo roadway and associated
improvements is subject to review and approval by the Director of
Public Works and Director of Planning and Building Safety.
10. The applicant must construct a Class I bicycle path on El Segundo
Boulevard in accordance with the El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan and Section 7.4 of the Development Agreement.
11, The applicant must construct Class II bicycle lanes in the Nash Street
Extension in accordance with the El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan and Section 7.5 of the Development Agreement.
12. The applicant must pay $75,000 towards the construction of bicycle
parking facilities at or adjacent to the Metro Green Line El Segundo
Station in accordance with Section 7.6.1 of the Development
Agreement.
13, The applicant must allow a pedestrian easement across one or a
combination of Parcels 13, 14 and /or 24 of Vesting Map No. 71551
to allow direct pedestrian access to the Metro Green Line Light Rail
Station in accordance with the El Segundo South Campus Specific
Plan and Section 7.6.1 of the Development Agreement. Before
recordation, the pedestrian easement must be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety, the
Director of Public Works and the City Attorney.
14. The applicant must record a 20 -year irrevocable offer of dedication
of Parcels 20 and 22 of Vesting Map No. 71551 in accordance with
the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan and Section 7.7 of the
Development Agreement. Before recordation, the irrevocable offer to
dedicate must be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning
and Building Safety, the Director of Public Works and the City
Attorney.
15. To obtain access to sewer service in El Segundo Boulevard a 25%
payment by the applicant towards the cost of a sewer line capacity
upgrade, up to $375,000, in accordance with Section 8.2 of the
Development Agreement is required not later than December 31,
2018.
16. If the applicant sells more that 20% of the ESSCSP campus area
(28.44 acres) to a user other than Raytheon or a Raytheon affiliate,
then all employees within the ESSCSP area must be provided
access to the 7.54 acre Open Space and Recreational area in
accordance with Section 9 of the Development Agreement.
17, The applicant must record a 20 -year irrevocable offer of dedication
of the 7.54 acre recreation /open space area to the City of El
Segundo, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for future potential
park purposes in accordance with the Development Agreement if
located on any of the lots (Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 13 or 14 of Vesting
Map No. 71551) outside the Raytheon security fenced perimeter.
18. The applicant must make one annual $500,000 payment and five
subsequent annual $700,000 payments to the City as identified in
Section 10 of the Development Agreement. Six annual payments are
required starting on March 31, 2016 and ending on March 31, 2021.
If the Nash Street roadway extension improvements are not
completed within 10 years of the effective date of the City Council
ordinance approving this project, an additional $5,000,000 payment
to the City is required.
�3-
% A $.50 per square foot fee for all new development on the site is
required. All revenue from this fee will be deposited to the City's
General Fund.
20. The applicant is required to obtain any necessary approvals from the
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro)
for any work that involves encroachment onto Metro easement areas
or right -of -ways. These approvals may include, without limitation,
pedestrian, bicycle and roadway easements and temporary right -of-
entry agreements.
21. The applicant is required to submit building and engineering plans to
Metro for any project site located within 100 feet of the Metro station
or rail easement. Clearance of these plans from Metro is required
before the City can issue a building permit. Metro requires an
Engineering Review Fee for evaluation of any impacts based on
adjacency and relationship of proposed new structures to the Metro
existing structures.
22. The applicant is required to obtain a Metro Special Operation Permit
for use of a pile driver or any other equipment in close proximity to a
Metro aerial railway support structure at least one week before
starting construction.
23. If required by Metro, the applicant must obtain a track allocation
permit for any work within ten feet of a Metro aerial railway support
structure. Permits allowing for single tracking or a power shutdown
Must be obtained! from Metro at least two weeks before the start of
construction.
24. The applicant must allow Metro representatives access to monitor
any construction activity to ascertain if construction activity will have
any impacts on Metro Right -of -Way.
25. Wayfinding signage to the Metro Green Line Station and other
transportation facilities must be provided at appropriate locations
within the Specific Plan area. These signs must be consistent with
applicable Metro guidelines for wayfinding signage. The Director of
Planning and Building Safety and the Director of Public Works must
review and approve the location and appearance of wayfinding
signs.
26. Before the City issues a certificate of occupancy for any new building
"Within the ESSCSP, the applicant must contact Metro about
employer transit pass programs. The applicant must provide
IN
verification of this contact to the Director of Planning and Building
Safety.
27, Projects located within the ESSCSP must comply with the City's
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) regulations (ESMC
§ §15 -17 -1, et seq.). Evaluation for compliance with the City's TDM
regulations for specific projects will occur as part of the Site Plan
Review process identified in ESSCSP § VII.D.
28. The applicant must contact the County Sanitation Districts of Los
Angeles County Industrial Waste Section and receive a
determination as to the necessity of a permit for industrial waste
discharge before City approval of a Site Plan Review for any project
within the ESSCSP.
29, A Study Application Package for a second customer dedicated
substation must be submitted to Southern California Edison before
City approval of a Site Plan Review for any project that would require
electrical service from a second substation within the ESSCSP area.
30. The applicant must submit six sets of project plans depicting the El
Segundo roadway widening and intersection improvements for
Southern California Edison review and approval before City approval
of building permits for a building identified as part of Phase II in the
EIR.
31, Trash and recycling enclosures must be provided and shown on site
plans that are sufficiently large enough to store the necessary bins
required for the regular collection of commercial solid waste and
recyclable materials. The site plan with the location and dimensions
of the trash and recycling enclosure and an elevation view of the
enclosure must be provided to the Planning and Building Safety
Department for review and approval before the City issues building
permits.
32. A qualified cultural resources monitor must be present during
earthmoving construction activities. The requirements and
procedures set forth in Public Resources Code §§ 5097, et seq.,
must be implemented if human remains are discovered during site
excavation.
33. Ground level mechanical equipment, refuse collectors, storage
tanks, generators, and other similar facilities must be screened from
view consistent with the development standards and design
guidelines contained in the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan.
-5-
34, Exterior lighting must be designed to minimize off -site glare.
35a Buildings must be designed to comply with all ESMC standards for
the attenuation of interior noise.
36. At the time of plan check submittal for the first project within the
ESSCSP area the applicant must submit funds to cover reasonable
first year costs, including City consultant costs, of monitoring all
conditions of approval and mitigation measures adopted in the
MMRP. Annually thereafter, the applicant is required to replenish
funds sufficient to cover the reasonable costs, including City
consultants' costs for each year. The Director of Planning and
Building Safety, at the Director's discretion, may retain a consultant
to coordinate and monitor compliance.
37. Before the City issues a grading permit, building permit, or certificate
of occupancy, as applicable, the applicant must provide evidence to
the Director of Planning and Building Safety that all mitigation
measures in the MMRP are or will be implemented.
38, A Landscape Master Plan for the ESSCSP must submitted to the
City before it approves the first Site Plan Review within the Specific
Plan area. This Landscape Master Plan is subject to review and
approval by the Director of Planning and Building Safety.
39. An overall Master Sign Program for the ESSCSP must be submitted
to the City before it approves the first Site Plan Review within the
Specific Plan area. This Master Sign Program is subject to review
and approval by the Director of Planning and Building Safety.
40. A Trip Budget tracking system, based on the criteria contained in
Appendix A of the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, must be
developed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building
Safety. An update of the Trip Budget tracking system is required to
be submitted with 'every Site Plan Review and Plan Check for
projects located within the ESSCSP area.
41. The Project Trip Ceiling for the project is the maximum number of
vehicle trips permitted for the project. The Project Trip Ceiling for new
development within the ESSCSP area consists of:
• 3,042 AM Peak Hour Trips (2,634 In and 408 Out)
• 3,120 PM Peak Hour Trips (631 In and 2,489 Out)
26,585 Total Daily Trips
N
42. Before the City issues a building permit for the first building located
within any Phase identified in the EIR, a reclaimed water facility plan
must be submitted for review and approval by the Director of
Planning and Building Safety and the Director of Public Works.
43, The project must meet all design criteria of the Specific Plan to the
satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building Safety.
• s �r
44. Before the City issues building permits, the applicant must submit a
geotechnical /soils report, along with an associated grading plan that
addresses the current code to the Planning and Building Safety
Department for review and approval.
45. Before the City issues grading permits, the applicant must submit a
soils report to the Planning and Building Safety Department for
review and approval.
46. Before the City issues building permits, plans must show compliance
with the version of the California Building Code, as adopted by the
ESMC, in effect at the time of building permit application.
47. Before the City issues grading or building permit for any project within
the Specific Plan area, the applicant must provide evidence to the
reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building
Safety that all applicable permits from other agencies are obtained
including, without limitation„ the California Department of
Transportation, Regional Water Quality Control Board (Los Angeles
Region), South Coast Air Quality Management District, and Los
Angeles County Department of Public Works.
r
48. The project must comply with all applicable requirements in the
California. Fire Code and the International Fire Code, as adopted by
the ESMC, and El Segundo Fire Department regulations, in effect at
the time of building permit application.
49. Before the City issues a building permit, the applicant must submit a
Fire /Life Safety Plan to the Fire Chief (or designee) identifying fire
safety precautions during demolition and construction, emergency
site access during construction, permanent fire department access,
fire hydrant locations and any existing or proposed fire sprinkler
system and fire alarm systems.
-7-
50. The applicant must provide a fire apparatus access roadway around
the west and north side of Raytheon Building E -1 (2000 East El
Segundo Boulevard) and the west side of Raytheon Buildings E -2
(2002 East El Segundo Boulevard) and E -3 (2004 East El Segundo
Boulevard). The fire apparatus access roadway must meet
requirements in the adopted California Fire Code and El Segundo
Fire Department Fire Prevention Regulation A -1 -a.
51. Private fire main systems for each new building or parcel must be
from an independent public water supply. There can be no sharing
of private fire main systems between parcels.
52. The applicant must provide an automatic fire sprinkler system
throughout each building, installed in accordance with California Fire
Code Chapter 9 and the currently adopted edition of NFPA 13, both
as adopted by the ESMC.
53. The applicant must provide the following conditions for any fire
features as part of this project: A) A barrier must be provided around
the fire feature to prevent accidental access into the fire feature; B)
The distance between the fire feature and combustible material and
fUrnishingi must meet the fire feature's listing and manufacturer's
requirements; and C) If the feature's protective barrier exceeds
ambient temperatures, all exit paths and occupant seating must be a
minimum 36 inches from the fire feature.
54. Each building needs to be identified as a separate street address for
emergency response purposes.
55. The project must provide on -site collection and dispersion
(infiltration) of non- stormwater discharges from testing and
maintenance of water-based fire protection systems (fire sprinklers
and private fire main systems) and other non - stormwater discharges.
56. Any diesel - powered generators must be approved by the Fire
Department, Environmental Safety Division, and provide for
secondary containment, placarding, spill detection and prevention.
Underground tanks require additional environmental monitoring
requirements.
57. The applicant must provide the Environmental Safety Division of the
El Segundo Fire Department an inventory of any and all chemicals
used in facilities that exceeds 55 gallons, 500 pounds or 200 cubic
feet.
M
58„ The applicant, or designee, must contact Underground Service Alert
before digging or excavating.
59. Restaurant and industrial activities must have segregated
wastewater systems to ensure pre- treatment devices are adequately
protected.
Public Works Department Conditions
60. All onsite utilities including, without limitation, water, electricity, gas,
sewer and storm drains, must be installed underground. Contact
Southern California Edison for required service and underground
requirements.
61. The applicant must secure any required encroachment permits from
the Public Works Department before commencing any work in the
public right -of -way.
62. The project must comply with the latest National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements and provide Best
Management Practices (BMPs) for sediment control, construction
material control and erosion control.
63. Before the City issues a building permit, the location and sizes of all
proposed water meters must be approved by the City's Water
Division.
64, Acceptable water service connection points for future construction in
the ESSCSP area is subject to review and approval by the Director
of Public Works.
65. The location of existing water service lateral connection points in the
ESSCSP area as well as existing and proposed fire hydrant
connections area subject to review and approval by the Director of
Public Works.
66. City water mains cannot be located on private property. The
applicant must provide a main meter in the public right -of -way.
67. Wastewater facilities cannot have structures built over them.
68. Wastewater facilities cannot be designed with curves; they must be
straight lines from manhole to manhole. If deviations are needed,
they must be made at manholes.
91
69. A registered civil engineer must provide storm (hydrologic and
hydraulic) calculations for appropriate storm drain facilities to control
on -site drainage and mitigate off -site impacts, as follows, subject to
review and approval from the Public Works Director, or designee:
The design must follow the criteria contained in the most
recent additions of both the Los Angeles County Department
of Public Works Hydrology Manual and Standard Urban
Storm Water Mitigation Plan. Flows must remain in their
historical drainage pattern so as not to impact neighboring
properties.
New development cannot increase the rate of flow (cubic feet
per second) or velocity (feet per second) of site run -off water
to any off -site drainage areas beyond the measured or
calculated pre - project rate and velocity.
70. Construction related parking must be provided on -site.
71. All record drawings (as-built drawings) and supporting
documentation must be submitted to the Public Works Department
before scheduling the project's final inspection.
Police Department Conditions
72. Before the City issues a building permit within the ESSCSP, the
applicant must submit photometric light studies for Police Chief or
designee review and approval. A site plan must be provided showing
buildings, parking areas, walkways, and the point -by -point
photometric calculation of the required light levels.
73. A schematic plan of the security camera systems for new structures
must be submitted for Police Chief or designee review and approval
before the City issues a building permit, and must be included as a
page in the stamped approved set of plans.
74. Lighting devices must be enclosed and protected by weather and
vandal resistant covers.
75. The location and design of crosswalks are subject to Police Chief or
designee review and approval review and approval.
76. The location and design of future bicycle racks and bicycle parking
areas are subject to Police Chief or designee review and approval.
-10-
77, The Police Chief or designee will review new buildings and tenant
improvements within buildings during the plan check process.
Interior and exterior improvements are subject to Police Chief or
designee review and approval. Items subject to review include, but
are not limited to, doors and hardware, roll -up doors, stairwells,
exterior mounted ladders and trash dumpsters.
78, Street addressing must be a minimum of 6 inches high and must be
visible from the street or driving surface, of contrasting color to the
background and illuminated during hours of darkness. Addressing
must also be shown on plan elevations.
79, All landscaping must be low profile around perimeter fencing,
windows, doors and entryways so as not to limit visibility or provide
climbing access. Dense bushes cannot be clumped together in a
manner that provides easy concealment.
Construction Conditions
80. Before any construction occurs within the plan area, the perimeter of
the development site must be fenced with a minimum 6 -foot high
fence. The fence must be covered with a material approved by the
Planning and Building Safety Director, or designee, to prevent dust
from leaving the site.
81. Public sidewalks must remain open at all times.
82. All haul trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials must
either be covered or maintain two feet of freeboard.
83. Construction vehicles cannot use any route except the City's
designated Truck Routes.
84. The applicant must develop and implement a construction
management plan for any project located within the Specific Plan
area. The construction management plan is subject to Director of
Planning and Building Safety and Director of Public Work review and
approval. The plan must include measures recommended by
SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403.
85, During construction and operations, all waste must be disposed in
accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. Toxic wastes
must be discarded at a licensed, regulated disposal site by a licensed
waste hauler.
-11-
%m act Fee Conditions
IX
86. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15- 27A -1, et seq., and before building permits
are issued, the applicant must pay a one -time fire services mitigation
fee in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 4687.
87. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15- 27A -1, et seq., and before building permits
are issued, the applicant must pay a one -time police services
mitigation fee in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 4687.
88. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15- 27A -1, et seq., and before building permits
are issued, the applicant must pay a one -time park services
mitigation fee in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 4687.
89. Before building permits are issued, the applicant must pay the
required sewer connection fees (as specified in ESMC Title 12 -3).
90. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15- 27A -1, et seq., and before the City issues
a certificate of occupancy for buildings within the Specific Plan, the
applicant must pay a one time traffic mitigation fee in accordance
with City Council Resolution No. 4443.
91. Permittee agrees to pay City any development impact fees ( "DIFs ")
that may be applicable to the Project. Permittee takes notice
pursuant to Government Code § 66020(d) that City is imposing the
DIFs upon the Project in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act
(Government Code § 66000, et seq.). The permittee is informed that
it may protest DIFs in accordance with Government Code § 66020.
92. All required fees, adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over
intersections and roadways affected by this Project and identified in
the MMRP adopted for this project, must be calculated and collected
by affected agencies before Certificates of Occupancy are issued for
any building identified as part of Phase II in the EIR. Proof of fee
payment must be provided to the Director of Planning and Building
Safety.
93. Before building permits are issued, the applicant must pay the
required School Fees. This condition does not limit the applicant's
ability to appeal or protest the payment of these fees to the school
districts(s).
94. Unless otherwise provided by the Development Agreement, the
vesting tentative map will expire pursuant to Government Code §
66452.6 and ESMC § 14 -1 -12.
-12-
95. The Raytheon Cotpany, agrees to indemnify and hold the City
harmless frorn and against any claim, action, damages, costs
(including, without li'llitation, attorney's fees), injuries, or liability,
arising frorn the City's approval of Environmental Assessment No.
EA -905, General Plan Amendment/General Plan Map Amendment
No. GPA 11 -01, Specific Plan No. SP 11 -01, Zone Change and
Zoning Map Amendment No. ZC 11 -02, Zone Text Amendment No.
ZTA 11 -01, Development Agreement No. DA 11 -02, and Subdivision
No. 11-02 (VTM No. 71551). Should the City be named in any suit,
or should any claim be brought against it by suit or otherwise,
whether the sarne be groundless or not, arising out of the City
approval of Environmental Assessment No. EA -905, General Plan
Amendment/General Plan Map Amendment No. GPA 11 -01,
Specific Plan No. SP 11 -01, Zone Change and' Zoning Map
Amendment No. ZC 11 -02, Zone Text Amendment No. ZTA 11 -01,
Development Agreement No. DA 11 -02, and Subdivision No. 11 -02
(VTM No. 71551), the Raytheon Company, agrees to defend the City
(at the City's request and' with counsel satisfactory to the City) and
will indemnify the City for any judgment rendered against it or any
sums paid out in settlement or otherwise. For purposes of this section
"the City" includes the City of El Segundo's elected officials,
appointed officials, officers, and employees.
By signing this document, RdDet a rsar -eon behalf of the Raytheon Company, certifies that
they have read, understood, and agree to the Project Conditions listed in this document.
J. Moore
s dent- Business Services
Company
PAPlanning & Building Safety \0 Planning - Old \PROJECTS (Planning) \901 - 925 \EA - 905 \City Council \EA -
905.CC reso.doc
-13-