Loading...
CONTRACT 4924-3 CLOSEDAgreement No. 4924 -3 Agreement No. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. This AGREEMENT is entered into this 30th day of December, 2015, by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a general law city and municipal corporation ( "CITY ") and MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation ( "CONSULTANT "). 1. CONSIDERATION. A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, below; B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement; C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a sum not to exceed thirty -one thousand, two hundred and ninety dollars ($31,290) for CONSULTANT's services. CITY may modify this amount as set forth below. Unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement, CITY will pay this sum as specified in the attached Exhibit "B ", which is incorporated by reference. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. A. CONSULTANT will perform services listed in the attached Exhibit "A," which is incorporated herein. B. CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space and facilities, and all tests, testing and analyses, calculation, and all other means whatsoever, except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be famished by CITY, necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement. 3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit a detailed invoice to CITY which lists the hours worked and hourly rates for each personnel category and reimbursable costs (all as set forth in Exhibit "A ") the tasks performed, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period, the cumulative percentage completed for each task, the total cost of that work during the preceding Page 1 of 11 Agreement No. 4924 -3 billing month and a cumulative cash flow curve showing projected and actual expenditures versus time to date. 4. POLITICAL REFORM ACT. CONSULTANT agrees that it will be considered a public official subject to the Political Reform Act of 1974 for purposes of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees and warrants that it has no financial interests which may be materially affected by the project for which the Initial Study, as specified in the SERVICES, is being prepared. Such financial interests may include, without limitation, interests in business entities, real property, or sources of income exceeding $500 received within the past year. CONSULTANT further warrants that, before executing this Agreement, it reviewed the Political Reform Act of 1974 and the Fair Political Practices Commission regulations, including, without limitation, Chapter 7 of Title 2 of the California Administrative Code, Section 18700, et seq., in order to determine whether any conflict of interest would require CONSULTANT to refrain from performing the SERVICES or in any way attempting to use its official position to influence the governmental decisions underlying the subject environmental clearances. 5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. A. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has Thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; ii. Carefully considered how the services should be performed; and iii.. Understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. B. If services involve wo!-k upon any site, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, before commencing the services hereunder. Should CONSULTANT discover any latent or unknown conditions that may materially affect the performance of the services, CONSULTANT will immediately inform CITY of such fact and will not proceed except at CONSULTANT's own risk until written instructions are received from CITY. C. Although CITY has a duty to the public to independently review any environmental document, including, without limitation a negative declaration or draft EIR, prepared by CONSULTANT, that duty to the public, or the breach thereof, will not relieve CONSULTANT of its duties under this Section or any representation provided by CONSULTANT in this Agreement. 6. KEY PERSONNEL. A. CONSULTANT's key personnel assigned to perform work under this Agreement Page 2 of 1 I and their level of responsibility are as follows: Glenn Lajoie, AICP Rita Garcia Alex Tabrizi Bob Matson Agreement No. 4924 -3 Project Director Project Manager Traffic Traffic B. The resume of each of the individuals identified in this Section are attached to this Agreement in Exhibit "C," and incorporated by reference. C. In the event CITY objects to the continued involvement with this Agreement by any of the persons listed in this Section, CONSULTANT agrees that it will replace such persons with individuals that are agreed to by CITY. 7. TERM. The term of this Agreement will be from December 30, 2015 to December 30, 2017. Unless otherwise determined by written amendment between the parties, this Agreement will terminate in the following instances: Ar Completion of the work specified in Exhibit "A "; B, Termination as stated in Section 15, 8. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. CONSULTANT will not perform any work under this Agreement until: A. CONSULTANT furnishes proof of insurance as required by this Agreement; and B. CITY gives CONSULTANT a written Notice to Proceed. C. Should CONSULTANT begin work on any phase in advance of receiving written authorization to proceed, any such professional services are at CONSULTANT's own risk. 9. TIME EXTENSIONS. Should CONSULTANT be delayed by causes beyond CONSULTANT's control, CITY may grant a time extension for the completion of the contracted services. If delay occurs, CONSULTANT must notify CITY within forty -eight hours (48 hours), in writing, of the cause and the extent of the delay and how such delay interferes with the Agreement's schedule. CITY may, but is not required to, extend the completion time, when appropriate, for the completion of the contracted services. 10. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties. Page 3 of 1 l Agreement No. 4924 -3 11. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 12. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT, at its sole expense, will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. 13. PROJECT COORDINATION AND SUPERVISION. A. Rita Garcia will be assigned as Project Manager and will be responsible for job performance, negotiations, contractual matters, and coordination with CITY's Project Manager. B. Sam Lee will be assigned as CITY's Project Manager and will be personaily in charge of and personally supervise or perform the technical execution of the Project on a day -to -day basis on behalf of CITY and will maintain direct communication with CONSULTANT's Project Manager. 14. WAIVER, ER, CITY's review or acceptance of, or payment for, work product prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement will not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights CITY may have under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising from CONSULTANT' 8 performance. A waiver by CITY of any breach of any terns, covenant, or condition contained in this ,greenrent will not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement, whether of the same or different character. 15. TERMINATION. A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination will be in writing. B. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement at any time with CITY's mutual consent. Notice will be in writing at least thirty (30) days before the effective termination date. C. Should termination occur, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT will, at CITY's option, become CITY's property, and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination, not to exceed the total costs under Section 1(C). D. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated. E. By executing this document, CONSULTANT waives any and all claims for Page 4 of 11 Agreement No. 4924 -3 damages that might otherwise arise from CITY's termination under this Section. 16. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement are CITY's property. CONSULTANT may retain copies of said documents and materials as desired, but will deliver all original materials to CITY upon CITY's written notice. CITY agrees that use of CONSULTANT's completed work product, for purposes other than identified in this Agreement, or use of incomplete work product, is at CITY's own risk. 17. PUBLICATION OF DOCUMENTS. Except as necessary for performance of service under this Agreement, no copies, sketches, or graphs of materials, including graphic art work, prepared pursuant to this Agreement, will be released by CONSULTANT to any other person or city without CITY's prior written approval. All press releases, including graphic display information to be published in newspapers or magazines, will be approved and distributed solely by CITY, unless otherwise provided by written agreement between the parties. 18. INDEMNIFICATION. A. CONSULTANT agrees to the following: i. Indemnification for Professional Services. CONSULTANT will save harmless and indemnify, and at CITY's request reimburse defense costs for CITY and all its officers, volunteers, employees and representatives (including reasonable attorney's fees), from and against any and all suits, actions, or claims, of any character whatever, brought for, or on account of, any injuries or damages sustained by any person or property resulting or arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission by CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT's officers, agents, employees, or representatives, in the performance of this Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from CITY's sole negligence, active negligence or willful misconduct. ii. Indemnification for other Damages. CONSULTANT indemnifies and holds CITY harmless from and against any claim, action, damages, costs (including,, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees), injuries, or liability, to the extent resulting from CONSULTANT's negligence or other wrongful conduct, arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, except for such loss or damage arising from CITY's sole negligence, active negligence or willful misconduct. Should CITY be named in any suit, or should any claim be brought against it by suit or otherwise, whether the same be groundless or not, arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, CONSULTANT will defend CITY (at CITY's request and with counsel satisfactory to CITY) and will indemnify CITY for any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise. Page 5 of 11 Agreement No. 4924 -3 iii. Exclusion for CEQA Actions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CONSULTANT need not indemnify, defend, or hold CITY harmless in CEQA actions initiated pursuant to Public Resources Code §§ 21167 and 21168 where CONSULTANT's work may form the basis of a lawsuit. However, should CONSULTANT's work, as contemplated by this Agreement, contain errors or omissions that results in an adverse ruling against CITY, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify and hold CITY harmless to the extent provided for in Section 18(A)(i). B. For purposes of this section "CITY" includes CITY's officers, officials and employees, C. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions will survive termination of this Agreement. D. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONSULTANT as required by Section 22, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification. 19. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT's professional services. CONSULTANT's attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY's written approval are prohibited and will be null and void. 20. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only. 21. AUDIT OF RECORDS. A. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation Page 6 of 11 Agreement No. 4924 -3 for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement. B. Upon inspection, CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements of this Section. CONSULTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective measures will result in immediate termination of this Agreement. C. CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement. 22. INSURANCE.. A. Before commencing performance under this Agreement, and at all other times this Agreement is effective, CONSULTANT must procure and maintain the following types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum, with the limits set forth below: ..yl ) psurarrce Commercial general liability: Professional Liability Business automobile liability Workers compensation lIJniits cornbincdl sin le $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Statutory requirement. & Commercial general liability insurance will meet or exceed the requirements of the most recent ISO -CGL Form. The amount of insurance set forth above will be a combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage for the policy coverage. Commercial General Liability policy will be endorsed to name City, its officials, and employees as "additional insureds" under said insurance coverage and to state that such insurance will be deemed "primary" such that any other insurance that may be carried by City will be excess thereto. Such insurance will be on an "occurrence," not a "claims made," basis and will not be cancelable or subject to reduction except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City. C. Automobile coverage will be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 0106 92, including symbol 1 (Any Auto). D. Professional liability coverage will be on an "occurrence basis" if such coverage is available, or on a "claims made" basis if not available. When coverage is provided on a "claims made basis," CONSULTANT will continue to maintain the insurance in effect for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated ( "extended insurance "). Such extended insurance will have the same Page 7 of 11 Agreement No. 4924 -3 coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by City arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect. E. CONSULTANT will furnish to City duly authenticated Certificates of Insurance evidencing maintenance of the insurance required under this Agreement, endorsements as required herein, and such other evidence of insurance or copies of policies as may be reasonably required by City from time to time. Insurance must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best Company Rating equivalent to at least a Rating of "A:VII." F. Should CONSULTANT, for any reason, fail to obtain and maintain the insurance required by this Agreement, City may obtain such coverage at CONSULTANT's expense and deduct the cost of such insurance from payments due to CONSULTANT under this Agreement or terminate. G. Self- Insured Retention/Deductibles. All policies required by this Agreement must allow CITY, as additional insured, to satisfy the self - insured retention ( "SIR ") and deductible of the policy in lieu of CONSULTANT (as the named insured) should CONSULTANT fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible is subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. CONSULTANT understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by CONSULTANT as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should CITY pay the SIR or deductible on CITY's behalf upon the CONSULTANT'S failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, CITY may include such amounts as damages in any action against CONSULTANT for breach of this Agreement in iddition to any other damages incurred by CITY due to the breach. 23. USE OF CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY's prior written approval to use any consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must approve of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation. 24. INCIDENTAL TASKS. CONSULTANT will meet with CITY monthly to provide the status on the project, which will include a schedule update and a short narrative description of progress during the past month for each major task, a description of the work remaining and a description of the work to be done before the next schedule update. 25. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows: CITY Sam Lee, Director of Planning and Page 8 of 11 CONSULTANT Rita Garcia, Technical Manager Building Safety City of El Segundo Planning & Bldg Dept 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 -3813 Fax: (310) 322 -4167 slee(d),elsemindo-OMII Agreement No. 4924 -3 Environmental Services RBF Consulting, Inc. 14725 Alton Pkwy, Irvine, CA 92618 -2027 Fax: (949) 837 -4122 11 lARCIt cembakeriritl.com Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. 26. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability. 27. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT's or CITY's obligations under this Agreement. 28. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County or in the Federal District Court in the District of California in which Los Angeles County is located. 29. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. There are three (3) Attachments to this Agreement. This Agreement will bind and inure to the benefit of the parties to this Agreement and any subsequent successors and assigns. 30. CONSISTENCY. In interpreting this Agreement and resolving any ambiguities, the main body of this Agreement takes precedence over the attached Exhibits; this Agreement supersedes any conflicting provisions. Any inconsistency between the Exhibits will be resolved in the order in which the Exhibits appear below: A. Exhibit A: Proposal for Services and Scope of Work; B. Exhibit B: Budget; and C. Exhibit C: Resumes. Page 9 of 11 Agreement No. 4924 -3 31. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party. 32. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and; as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect. 31 AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorise the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein, This Agreement may be modified by written amendment. CITY's city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY. 34. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Agreement, agreements ancillary to this Agreement, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission, Such facsimile signature will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. 35. COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS. The parties agree that all of the provisions hereof will be construed as both covenants and conditions, the same as if the words importing such covenants and conditions had been used in each separate paragraph. 3+5. CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs of this Agreement are for convenience of ref�6rence only and will not affect the interpretation of this Agreement. 37. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be prevented due to fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties' control, the*i the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other. 38. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be provided. 39. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency. Page 10 of 11 Agreement No. 4924 -3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF I� I `EGUNDO MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, ' INC. Greg City ATTEST: A ,. 7 Tra "'"ea \nor, _.m. h.,. fit Qlel° k APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark 1. 1°Ietlsley, City Attorney Glenn Lajoie Vice President, Planning and Environmental Services Taxpayer ID No. 95- 2247293 PAPlanning & Building Safety\0 Planning - Old \Consultant Ping Services\Environmental ConsultantARBF- Michael Baker \Top Golf Project\PSA - Michael Baker Top Golf Parking Study.doc Page 11 of 11 Agreement No. 4924 -3 Exhibit A Scope Of Se vices INTERNATIONAL December 17, 2015 Ms. Kimberly Christensen, AICP Planning Manager CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 350 Main Street El Segundo, California 90245 Agreement No. 4924 -3 We Make a Difference JN 140835 Subject: Proposal to Prepare a Parking Demand Study and Trip Generation Observation for the Topgolf Project Dear Ms. Christensen: Michael Baker International (Michael Baker), is pleased to submit this Proposal to the City of El Segundo to prepare a Parking Demand Study and Trip Generation Observation for the Topgolf Project. It is our understanding that the Applicant is a Topgolf facility at 400 South Sepulveda Boulevard. Minor modifications to The Lakes at El Segundo existing nine -hole golf course would be required. The Project proposes to replace the existing driving range with a Topgolf facility that would include an approximately 65,000 square foot, three -story facility with 102 hitting bays, an outdoor outfield, full service restaurant, bar, lounges, and corporate /event meeting space and family entertainment area with games. The requested Project approvals may include a Lot Line Adjustment and shared parking uses. The City has requested this Proposal in support of the pending compliance documentation (i.e., EIR). Based upon our review of available Project information and background with similar projects throughout California, we have developed a greater understanding of the parking analysis required for the Project. Michael Baker has become intimately familiar with environmental factors and issues of concern in El Segundo. Along with the recently completed El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan EIR, Michael Baker's El Segundo project references include multiple IS /MNDs (Douglas Street/Utah Avenue Project, Queen Esther Square Shopping Center, Chevron Central Reliability Center and Central Tool Room /I&E Shops, Nash Street Data Center, Equinix Data Center, T5 Data Center, Hampton Inn, and Aloft Hotel). We appreciate your consideration of Michael Baker for the Topgolf Project Parking Demand Analysis and are available to begin the work program immediately. The undersigned is an agent authorized to submit proposals on behalf of Michael Baker and is authorized to negotiate with the City on this Project. We welcome the opportunity to meet with you to discuss the Scope of Work in greater detail. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 949.855.3663 or at GAL @mbakerintl.com if you have any questions or would like additional information. Sincerely, Glenn Lajoie, AIC Ritaaria Vice President Technical Manger Planning and Environmental Sciences Environmental Sciences Division 14725 Alton Parkway I Irvine, CA 92616 .,•BF fma _`FA WIMI N MALUMU MBAKERINTL.COM office: 949.472.35051 Fax: 949,472.8373 Agreement No. 4924 -3 PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Prepared for: CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Submitted by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL December 17, 2015 Agreement No. 4924 -3 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Understanding of the Project ..................... ........ .........,.... .......,. .....,......,.. 1 II, Scope of Work ............ ............................... ,,.. ........ .,...,.....,.,, 1 1.0 Parking Demand Analysis .......................... ......... ,,.,....w...... .....,.,......1 2.0 Trip Generation Analysis ................................................ .._— ...... .....,,...,....,......,..... 4 3.0 Project Management and Conference Calls .................... ........ .— .— ........ ........,.,.... 4 2.1 Project Management .................................................... ...........,,.,.....,........,. 4 2.2 Conference Calls .... ............. ........... - -... , ...................... .,.,.., 4 3.0 Deliverables ...................................................... III. Budget.......... ........ ..... _ ........ ....... ...... .,....... ....,,,., ............,. ,.,.,...... 6 Agreement No. 4924 -3 The proposed Project is considered a special generator in terms of forecast parking demand and forecast trip generation due the unique mixed -use composition of land uses comprising the proposed Project. Hence, it is not possible to determine the forecast parking demand or forecast trip generation of the proposed Project by utilizing data contained in industry standard publications, such as the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) or the Urban Land Use Institute (ULI). To determine the parking demand and resulting capacity need required to serve the proposed Project, hourly parking demand counts are needed at a facility with similar characteristics, as the proposed Project. Namely, the similar characteristics involve isolated survey sites with no parking demand spillover from adjacent land uses. No such similar Topgolf facility currently exists in California. However, two similar Topgolf facilities exist in the Phoenix area; see descriptions below. Therefore, hourly parking demand counts would be conducted at the two Phoenix area Topgolf facilities, since they involve similar characteristics, as the proposed Project. Similarly, to determine the Project's forecast trip generation, trip generation observations are needed at a facility with similar characteristics„ as the proposed Project. Namely, the similar characteristics involve isolated survey sites in a similar urban setting. Therefore, trip generation observations would be conducted at the two Phoenix area Topgolf facilities, since they involve similar characteristics, as the proposed Project. The trip generation observation data would later be utilized to determine the study area for the Project's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), to be prepared in the future under a separate scope and fee. The two existing Phoenix area Topgolf sites, which would be utilized for parking and trip observations, are: 0 1689 South San Tan Village Parkway, Gilbert, Arizona (general hours of operation 9:00 AM to 1:00 AM); and 0, 9500 East Indian Bend Road, Scottsdale, Arizona (general hours of operation 9:00 AM to 2:00 AM). JN 140835 10 December 17, 2015 Agreement No. 4924 -3 City of El Segundo GO Proposal for Topgolf Parking Demand Analysis & Trip Generation Observation Additionally, to determine the forecast shared parking demand and resulting shared capacity need of the proposed Project in conjunction with the adjacent Lakes at El Segundo Golf Course, hourly parking demand counts would be conducted at the existing 9 -hole City golf course. The parking analysis will factor in the removal of the driving range at the existing El Segundo golf course. 1.0 PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS The following Scope of Work is proposed for this study effort: 1.1 Collect hourly parking demand counts at The Lakes at El Segundo golf course during one typical Thursday, One typical Friday, one typical Saturday, and one typical Sunday from 6:00 AM to 11:00 PM. 1.2 Collect hourly parking demand counts at the two existing Topgolf sites located in Arizona during one typical Thursday, one typical Friday, one typical Saturday, and one typical Sunday from 9:00 AM to 2:00 AM. 1.3 Derive forecast hourly parking demand for The Lakes at El Segundo existing 9 -hole golf course and the proposed Topgolf based on the observed hourly parking demand collected as part of Tasks 1.1 and 1.2. The overall hourly parking demand for the Project site will be derived by adding the observed hourly parking demand from The Lakes at El Segundo existing 9 -hole golf course to the average observed hourly parking demand at the existing Topgolf sites, adjusting for the removal of the driving range at the existing El Segundo golf course. This scope of work assumes the City will provide Michael Baker the number of golfers currently utilizing The Lakes at El Segundo driving range on a typical weekday and a typical weekend day on an hourly basis. Michael Baker will convert that information assuming an dveraos vehicle ridership (AVR) of 1.0 (each golfer at the range arrives and leaves in a separate vehicle parked at the site) or other AVR factor as directed by City staff. 1.4 Summarize the results of the parking demand analysis in a technical report and make recommendations on the parking supply that would be required to accommodate The Lakes at El Segundo existing 9 -hole golf course and the proposed Topgolf facility. The following Scope of Work is proposed for this study effort: 2.1 Collect 24 -hour trip generation data at the two existing Topgolf sites located in Arizona during one typical Thursday, One typical Friday, one typical Saturday, and one typical Sunday. 2.2 Determine the average hourly and peak hour trip generation for a typical Topgolf facility utilizing the data collected as part of Task 2.1. It is noted this information would be utilized to determine the extent of the study area for preparation of a TIA for the proposed Project. JN 140835 11 December 17, 2015 Agreement No. 4924 -3 City of El Segundo Proposal for Topgolf Parking Demand Analysis & Trip Generation Observation This scope of work does not assume preparation of a TIA. The Project TIA would be prepared under a separate scope and fee after determination of the appropriate study area. It is also noted, this specified fees are based upon analysis of the Original Site Plan received by Michael Baker from the City at the time work is initiated. Should the original Site Plan be modified (per the Client or their respective associates) after the work is initiated by Michael Baker, then Michael Baker will require a change Order and budget modification to accommodate changes before completing the work. 3.0 PROJECT A AGE E T AND CONFERENCE CALLS 3.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Ms. Garcia will be responsible for management and supervision of the Project Team, as well as consultation with the City staff. Ms. Garcia will coordinate with all technical staff, support staff, and word processing toward the timely completion of the Parking Demand Study and Trip Generation Observation. 3.2 CONFERENCE CALLS Michael Baker has budgeted for Project Conference Calls to allow fordiscussions with City staff and others, as requested by the City. The Michael Baker Project Manager and up to two additional key Project Team personnel will participate in these calls. This scope assumes an initial budget of 25 hours of Project Conference Calls time. 4.0 DELIVERABLES 2 Hard copy of the Administrative Draft Parking Demand Study and Trip Generation Observation; 1 Electronic copy* of the Administrative Draft Parking Demand Study and Trip Generation Observation; 2 Hard copy of the Final Parking Demand Study and Trip Generation Observation; 1 Electronic copy* of the Final Parking Demand Study and Trip Generation Observation; `Electronic copies of all deliverables will be provided in both PDF and MS Word formats. JN 140835 12 December 17, 2015 Agreement No. 4924 -3 Exhibit B Agreement No. 4924 -3 JN 140835 13 December 17, 2015 Agreement No. 4924 -3 0 N r a x N X LO r ti N H N 0 U. a .0 7 c1 C LY W a 0 rn CL 0 H Agreement No. 4924 -3 Exhibit C Resumes Agreement No. 4924 -3 GLENN LAJOIE, AICP ? PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE Registration /Certification: I Education: 1994, American Institute of Certified B.A., 1985, Geography /Urban Studies, California State University, Planners, 087288 Long Beach Years Experience: 27 M.P.A., 1992, Public Policy and Administration, California State University, Long Beach i Professional Affiliations: Full Member, American Planning Association Full Member, Association of Environmental Professionals Member, Orange County American Planning Association Board of Directors, 1992 -1997 President, Orange County American Planning Association, 1994- 1996 California APA AICP Director, 2011 -2012 Lecturer, California State University, Long Beach Mr. Lajoie's primary responsibilities include oversight of daily operations, management of projects, staff mentoring and instruction, scheduling, and business development. With many years of practical experience, Mr. Lajoie is a recognized leader in CEQA and NEPA studies (EIR's, EIS's, Negative Declarations, Environmental Assessments), as well as other policy planning documents, including General Plans, Area Plans, Specific Plans, and due diligence studies. Projects have ranged from private entitlement applications related to residential and commercial projects as well as a variety of solar, water, wastewater, highway, and redevelopment projects throughout California. Project responsibilities include analysis, technical review and management of environmental and policy planning documentation for compliance with CEQA/NEPA, implementation of public participation programs, and assistance to various public and private sector clients in meeting the requirements of local, State, and Federal agencies. Relevant Experience: Beverly Hills Gardens and Montage Hotel Mixed Use Project EIR (Beverly Hills, CA) Boeing Specific Plan Program EIR (Seal Beach, CA) ■ Clearwater Specific Plan EIR (Mammoth Lakes, CA) ■ Dana Point Harbor Revitalization Project EIR (Dana Point, CA) ■ Dana Point Town Center Amendment IS /MND (Dana Point, CA) DWP Specific Plan Amendment EIR (Seal Beach, CA) Downtown and Central Long Beach Redevelopment Plans Master EIR (Long Beach, CA) • El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan EIR (El Segundo, CA) • General Plan Amendment EIRs (Lancaster, CA) • Grand Canal Entertainment Center EIR (Bakersfield, CA) • Hotel Del Coronado Master Plan EIR (Coronado, CA) Lido House Hotel EIR (Newport Beach, CA) Long Point (Terranea) Resort EIR (Rancho Palos Verdes, CA) Marblehead Coastal EIR (San Clemente, CA) Marymount College Facilities Expansion EIR (Rancho Palos Verdes, CA) ■ North Village Mammoth Specific Plan Program EIR (Mammoth Lakes, CA) • Pacific Gateway Plaza Project MND (Seal Beach, CA) • Ritz Carlton (Rancho Palos Verdes, CA) • Rivers End Staging Area & San Gabriel Bikeway Enhancement Plan MND (Seal Beach, CA) • Seal Beach Townhomes Project MND (Seal Beach, CA) • Shoreline Gateway EIR (Long Beach, CA) Agreement No. 4924 -3 RITA GARCIA, PROJECT MANAGER Years Experience: 25 Education: B.S., 1988, Urban and Regional Planning, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Professional Affiliations: American Planning Association Association of Environmental Professionals Ms. Garcia is involved in the preparation, daily monitoring, and coordination of CEQA documents, ensuring their timely completion reflective of the highest standard of professional care. With over 25 years in the environmental fleld, Ms. Garcia has extensive experience with projects involving sensitive planning and environmental issues including land use and planning, aesthetics /visual character, and traffic /circulation. She has had significant experience with environmental analyses of a very broad range of projects, including small /large, development/redevelopment, residential /non - residential, and mixed -use (i.e., commercial, hotel, residential, and infrastructure). These projects were located in varied settings, including inland and coastal, and rural and urban communities, many involving substantial controversy and public participation. Her background is foundational to providing environmental, land use, and project management services that produce successful results for her clients. Her experience in CEQA analysis ranges from Initial Studies /Negative Declarations for small -scale urban infill mixed -use projects to environmental impact reports (EIRs) for large -scale developments on vacant properties. More specifically, her experience as Project Manager includes numerous office and commercial projects, including the Beverly Hills Gardens and Montage Hotel Mixed -Use Project EIR in Beverly Hills, the Long Point (Terranea) Resort Project EIR in Rancho Palos Verdes, and the Anchor Live/Work Project IS /MND and West 17th Street & Superior Avenue Live/Work Project IS/MIND in Costa Mesa. In El Segundo, Ms. Garcia has served as Project Manager for rnixed -use, commercial, and hotel redevelopment projects, including the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Project EIR, Queen Esther Square Shopping Center Project IS /MND, Aloft Hotel IS /MND, and Hampton Inn 1S/MIND. These environmental documents involved critical land use compatibility issues and in depth analyses of consistency with city policies and code standards for infill developments in urban settings. These projects also required detailed aesthetics /visual character, noise, and traffic /circulation analyses for short- and long -term conditions. Relevant Experience: ■ 601 North Parkcenter IS/MND (Santa Ana) Automobile Club of Southern California Project EIR (Costa Mesa) Boeing Specific Plan EIR (Seal Beach) Contract Planner (City of Orange) Crestridge Senior Housing EIR (Rancho Palos Verdes) Cypress Business and Professional Center Specific Plan EIR (Cypress) +� Dana Point Harbor Revitalization EIR (Dana Point) Department of Water and Power Specific Plan Amendment EIR (Seal Beach) ■ Downtown and Central Long Beach Redevelop Plans EIR (Long Beach) ■ El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan EIR (El Segundo, CA) • Hotel del Coronado Master Plan Program EIR (Coronado) • Hyundai Motor America - North American Corporate Campus Project EIR (Fountain Valley) • Long Point (Terranea) Resort EIR (Rancho Palos Verdes, CA) • Monterey Downs, Monterey Horse Park, and Central Coast Veterans Cemetery SP EIR (Seaside) • Palmdale Transit Village Specific Plan EIR (Palmdale, CA) • Pacific Gateway Plaza Project MND (Seal Beach) Ritz Carlton Specific Plan EIR (Rancho Palos Verdes) Shoreline Gateway EIR (Long Beach) South Pasadena Downtown Revitalization EIR (South Pasadena) Agreement No. 4924 -3 BOB MATSON, VICE PRESIDENT — TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Years Experience: 30 Education: B.S., 1984, Engineering Technology, Califomia State Polytechnic University, Pomona Certification, 1988 Land Use & Development Planning, UC Irvine Professional Affiliations: Institute of Transportation Engineers Irvine Spectrum Transportation Management. Association Mr. Matson has over 30 years of comprehensive transportation /land use planning and analysis of diverse large to small projects for both public and private sector clients. Mr. Matson and his staff generate a variety of transportation /traffic and parking studies to analyze projects at various stages of development, including due diligence, conceptual planning, site layout, stakeholder /community involvement & assessment, agency general plan /zoning modifications, CEQA and NEPA environmental documentation, preliminary engineering, project/infrastructure phasing, site plans, maps, final engineering and construction management. His years of expertise allow him to work effectively with local & state agencies and developers to come up with solutions to issues that arise through the various stages of project development. Mr. Matson is well- versed in political assessment, community workshops, and public hearings for decision - makers. He has served a volunteer Board Member of the Irvine Spectrum Transportation Management Association (TMA), also known as Spectrumotion, for over 25 years, serving several terms as President of the TMA, a nationally recognized non - profit TMA providing incentivized options to reduce single -occupant vehicle trips generated by the 2,600 businesses located in Irvine Spectrum that employee over 55,000 people though utilization of ridesharing, rail and bus transit, bicycles and walking. Relevant Experience: • Raytheon South Campus Specific Plan Traffic Analysis (El Segundo) • Queen Ester /In -N -Out Traffic Analysis (El Segundo) Also Creek Inn & Golf Course Traffic & Shared Parking Analysis (Laguna Beach) Indian Wells Garden of Champions Tennis Complex & Resort Traffic Analysis & Parking Analysis (Indian Wells) Montage Hotel & Gardens Mixed Use Traffic Analysis & Shared Parking Analysis (Beverly Hills) Downtown Laguna Beach Specific Plan Parking Management Plan (Laguna Beach) Downtown Beverly Hills Parking Analysis (Beverly Hills) Pacific Edge Resort Traffic Analysis & Shared Parking Analysis (Laguna Beach) • Lido House Resort Hotel Traffic Analysis & Shared Parking Analysis (Newport Beach) • Bunker Hill Parking Analysis (Los Angeles) • Citywide Comprehensive Traffic Analysis (Torrance) o Glendale Town Center Traffic Analysis (Glendale) • William Morns Headquarters Office Building Traffic & Parking Analysis (Beverly Hills) • Hyundai Motor America North American Corporate Campus Project Traffic Analysis (Fountain Valley) • Galleria At Tyler Mixed Use Traffic Analysis (Riverside) • El Monte Transit Village Mixed Use Traffic Analysis (El Monte) • Dana Point Harbor Revitalization Traffic Study (Dana Point) • Norms Restaurants Parking Analysis (Pico Rivera, Claremont, Downey) • Wilshire Boulevard Corridor Traffic Analysis (Beverly Hills) • 11960 Washington Boulevard Mixed Use Traffic Analysis (Culver City) • Hilton Garden Inn Irvine Traffic Analysis (Irvine) • Nest Mixed Use Traffic Analysis (Los Angeles) • Glendale Galleria Mixed Use Traffic Analysis & Parking Analysis (Glendale, CA) • Dana Point Mixed Use Parking Analysis (Dana point) • Marblehead Mixed Use Traffic Analysis (San Clemente) • Nickelodeon Headquarters Traffic Analysis (Burbank) • Duarte Transit Orientated Development Traffic Analysis (Duarte) Agreement No. 4924 -3 RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. ALEX TABRIZI, PE, TE, ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL ENGINEER Years Experience: 13 Education: B.S., 2005, Civil Engineering, University of California , Irvine Professional Affiliations: American Society of Civil Engineers Orange County Traffic Engineers Council Alex Tabrizi, P.E., T.E., has worked professionally in the field traffic engineering and transportation planning /engineering since 2003. He received his bachelors of science degree in civil engineering with an emphasis on structural engineering from the University of California, Irvine. Mr. Tabrizi ties extensive experience in providing transportation planning and engineering consulting services and expertise to a wide range of clients including private sector, land developers, public agencies, various districts of California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans), and local governments. Mr. Tabriz! has completed and supervised preparation of hundreds of complex transportation planning and parking demand /utilization studies over the past decade with successful track record in providing innovative, cost - effective and practical technical consulting services and solutions for politically sensitive, complex, and unique projects involving numerous stakeholders and requiring to meet accelerated project schedules. Mr. Tabrizi has performed transportation planning studies dealing with various stages of project development, such as signal warrant analysis, circulation analysis, full traffic impact analysis, roundabout analysis and parking studies. He has prepared traffic flow visual simulations combining measured vehicular and pedestrian volumes with aerial imagery to show existing and future traffic circulation for public understanding and discussion. Mr. Tabrizi has also completed a number of transportation engineering and roadway design projects ranging from preparing preliminary studies and reports such as Caltrans Project Reports (PR) and City street improvement concepts to final construction plans, specifications, and cost estimates for Caltrans highway improvement projects. Mr. Tabrizi is knowledgeable in computer applications for transportation engineering and planning, including, AutoCAD, Microstation with InRoads, Traffix, HCS, Synchro/ SimTraffic, and aaSIDRA. Relevant Experience: • Raytheon South Campus Specific Plan (El Segundo, CA) • In -N -Out El Segundo (El Segundo, CA) • City of Upland City-Wide Engineering & Traffic Survey • City of Upland City-Wide Traffic Signal & Equipment Review • Metro Goldwyn Mayer (MGM) Office Building (Beverly Hills, CA) • Moorpark Studios West - Largest Independent Movie Studios in the US (Moorpark, CA) • Indian Wells. Tennis Garden Stadium (Indian Welts„ CA) • Casino San Pablo Traffic Analysis (San Pablo, C) • Glendale Galleria Traffic & Parking Support (Glendale, CA) • Galleria at Tyler Expansion Project (Riverside, CA) • The Shops at Tanforan Site Circulation & Wayfinding (San Bruno, CA) • The Boulevards at South Bay On -Site Circulation (Carson„ CA) • Hilton Garden Inn Hotel (Irvine, CA) • Porsche Experience Center (Carson, CA) • Lost Canyons Residential & Golf Club (Simi Valley, CA) • Downtown Summer Festival Parking Management Plan (Laguna Beach, CA)