CONTRACT 4716B Amendment CLOSEDAgreement No. 4716B
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT ("Amendment") is made, and entered into this 17" day of
February, 2016, by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a general law city and municipal
corporation existing under the laws of California ("CITY"), and MICHAEL BAKER
INTERNATIONAL, (formerly RBF Consulting A Michael Baker International Company),
Pennsylvania Corporation ("CONTRACTOR"),
I Pursuant to Section 33 of Agreement No. 4716 ("Agreement Section I.0 of the
Agreement is amended to add the services set forth in Exhibit "C" and incorporated by
reference, to this Amendment. The CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR a sum not to
exceed One Hundred and Eight Thousand, Seven Hundred and Forty-Five Dollars
($108,745.00) for CONTRACTOR's additional services.
2, This Amendment may be executed in any number or counterparts, each r'. which will b*
an original, but all of which together constitutes one instrument executed on the same
date.
3. Except as modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of Agreement
No. 4716 remain the same.
Agreement No. 4716B
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Amendment the day and
year first hereinabove written,
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
CITY 0�- �1 S1xj(L"AACEO
Greg ("m wn tcr Glenn Lajoie
City M' Vice President, Planning and Environmental
Services
X
Mike 'yh
Vice Pres,
Ide, t, C I Ke, Manager
Taxpayer ID No. 25-1228638
cl 41ver' . . .. ........ .
ity
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
for
-J� �He� - --- —'-"""''''"'
City Attorney
INTERNATIONAL
Agreement No. 4716B
We Make a Difference
JN: 145070
. ............ ..m. ... ..
Request No.: 3
Date: January 29, 2016
ADDITIONAL WORK REQUEST SUMMARY - EXHIBIT C
Client: City of El Segundo
Project: Park Place Extension and Railroad Grade Separation Project
Work Requested By: Mr. Paul Samaras, Principal Planner
Summary of Additional Work:
On November 10, 2015, the City of El Segundo (City) provided Michael Baker International (Michael Baker)
direction to add two new build alternatives for analysis within the environmental document. These two
new build alternative would include: 1) an alternative that leaves both the UPRR and BNSF rail alignments
in place, and would include an extension of Park Place via two separate grade separations; and 2) an
alternative that leaves both the UPRR and BNSF rail alignments in place, and would include a grade
separation at the UPRR alignment and an at -grade crossing at the BNSF alignment. The addition of these
two new build alternatives will require numerous revisions to Michael Baker's original contract dated
January 15, 2015. The following summarizes the services provided in response to this request.
TASK 1: PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR TWO NEW BUILD ALTERNATIVES (NCM ENGINEERING
CORPORATION)
Michael Baker has retained NCM Engineering Corporation to assist with preliminary design for the two
new build alternatives. NCM will provide conceptual design for the following:
• Alternative 3A: Both UPRR and BNSF alignments remain in place and are grade separated from
the Park Place extension.
• Alternative 313: Both UPRR and BNSF alignments remain in place. UPRR is grade separated from
the Park Place extension while a new at -grade crossing is constructed at the BNSF tracks.
The primary components of this effort will include:
1. Preliminary Alternative Design
1a. Roadway Design: NCM will prepare roadway layout exhibits, profile exhibits, and roadway typical
section for each of the two build alternatives.
1b. Rail Design: NCM will prepare railroad layouts and profiles for each of the two build alternatives.
It is anticipated that modifications to the BNSF tracks will include changes in profile to facilitate
the at grade crossing with Alternative 3B as well as reconfiguration of the BNSF storage yard to
minimize the tracks at the at -grade crossing or grade separation.
Agreement No. 4716B
We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
1c. Bridge Design: NCM will prepare a bridge General Plan for the railroad bridge associated with
Alternative 3A.
1d. Stage Construction Concepts: NCM will develop stage construction concepts for each of the two
alternatives, detailing the anticipated construction sequence as well as any temporary shoofly
tracks that will be needed.
2. Utility Relocation Concepts: NCM will identify areas where the proposed build alternatives conflict
with existing utilities and develop strategies for resolving those conflicts. We will prepare exhibits
detailing the utility relocation concepts.
3. R/W Requirements: NCM will tabulate the R/W impacts and prepare R/W requirement maps for each
of the two alternatives.
4. Ongoing Design Assistance: NCM will provide ongoing design assistance on a time and materials
basis. This task is expected to include assistance to City and Michael Baker staff to clarify construction
assumptions (staging, excavation depths, phasing, impact footprint, temporary rail impacts, etc.) and
provide additional detail regarding conceptual design.
Deliverables associated with this task will include:
• Roadway layout exhibits at a scale of 1" =150' (Assumed 1 exhibit per alternative, 2 total)
• Roadway profile exhibits at a horizontal scale of 1" =100' and vertical scale of 1 " =20' (Assumed 1
exhibit per alternative, 2 total)
• Roadway typical sections (Assumed 1 exhibit per alternative, 2 total)
• Rail layout exhibits at a scale of 1" =200' (Assumed 1 exhibit per alternative, 2 total)
• Rail profile exhibits at a horizontal scale of 1" =100' and vertical scale of 1 " =20' (Assumed 2
• exhibits per alternative, 4 total)
• Stage Construction Exhibits (Assumed 3 exhibits per alternative, 6 total)
• Utility Relocation Exhibits (Assumed 4 exhibits per alternative, 8 total)
• R/W Requirement Exhibits (Assumed 1 exhibit per alternative, 2 total)
• R/W Requirements in tabular form with APN numbers and acquisition and remainder areas.
TASK 2: REVISIONS TO EXISTING PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (PES) FORM
The City recently received approval of the PES Form associated with the proposed project July 2015.
Michael Baker will assist the City with revisions to the existing PES Form to account for the two new build
alternatives (Alternatives 3A and 313). It is anticipated that Caltrans will require revisions to the project
description, inclusion of concept plans for the two new alternatives, and ensuring that the two new
alternatives are reflected in the impact analysis within the PES. Michael Baker will assist the City with
processing the revised PES Form through Caltrans District 7 Local Assistance for approval. This task
assumes two rounds of review and revision based on City and /or Caltrans comments.
14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618 -2027
MBAKERINTL.COM Office: 949.472.35051 Fax: 949.472.8373
Agreement No. 4716B
We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
TASK 3: REVISIONS TO EXISTING INITIAL STUDY /NOTICE OF PREPARATION (IS /NOP)
Michael Baker will incorporate Alternatives 3A and 3B into the Administrative Draft IS /NOP for the
proposed project. This task will include the inclusion of concept plans as exhibits within the document,
updates to the project description to reflect a total of four build alternatives. The impact analysis will also
be revised to ensure that the two new alternatives are adequately analyzed.
TASK 4: REVISIONS TO EXISTING TECHNICAL STUDIES
The following technical studies will require revisions to accommodate the addition of Alternatives 3A and
3B. Primary components of this task include revisions to the project description, inclusion of concept
plans for the two new alternatives, and ensuring that the two new alternatives are reflected in the impact
analysis within each technical report. The studies will include:
• Natural Environment Study (NES)
• Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) Technical Memorandum and Checklist
• Phase I Initial Site Assessment (ISA)
• Air Quality Assessment
• Noise Study Report
• Historic Property Survey Report/Archaeological Survey Report/Historical Resources Evaluation
Report (HPSR /ASR /HRER)
This task includes costs associated with Geo- Environmental, Inc. (Phase I ISA) and Cogstone Resource
Management (HPSR /ASR /HRER).
TASK 5: ANALYSIS OF TWO ADDITIONAL BUILD ALTERNATIVES IN EIR /EA
Michael Baker will incorporate Alternatives 3A and 3B into the Environmental Impact
Report/Environmental Assessment (EIR /EA) to be processed through Caltrans District 7. Michael Baker's
existing scope of work accounted for analysis of a No Build Alternative in addition to two build
alternatives. As such, this task would account for the analysis of a No Build Alternative and increase the
number of build alternatives in the EIR /EA to a total of four (Alternatives 1A, 1C, 3A, and 313). Alternatives
3A and 3B will be addressed at a project -level of detail throughout the EIR /EA, consistent Caltrans
requirements. Impacts will be analyzed on both a project -level and cumulative basis, as required by
Caltrans. Short-term construction and long -term operational impacts will be evaluated. Consistent with
the Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference (SER), the analysis will consider impacts for all build
alternatives relative to the Human Environment, Physical Environment, and Biological Environment.
TASK 6: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Ms. Rita Garcia and Mr. Alan Ashimine will provide coordination and oversight of the work effort under
this Additional Work Request. This task will include consultation with City and Caltrans staff, coordination
14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618 -2027
MBAKERINTL.COM
Office: 949 472,3505 1 Fax: 949 472,B373
Agreement No. 4716B
We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
and management of NCM Engineering, correspondence /conference calls to discuss the two new build
alternatives, and QA /QC of the deliverables identified above.
TOTAL FEE: $ $108,745 (Budget Detail is attached)
Alan Ashimine, Senior Associate Accepted By /Date
14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618 -2027
MBAKERINTL.COM Office: 949.47235051 Fax: 949.472.8373
I N T E R N AT 1 0 N A L
FEE ESTIMATE
Agreement No. 4716B
We Make a Difference
14725 Afton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618 -2027
MBAKERINTL.COM
Office: 949 472.3505 1 Fax: 949472.8373