CONTRACT 5010 Memorandum of Understanding CLOSEDAgreement No. 5010
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, THE CITY OF CARSON, THE CITY OF EL
SEGUNDO, THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE, THE CITY OF INGLEWOOD, THE CITY OF
LAWNDALE, THE CITY OF LOMITA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT, AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, AND THE SOUTH
BAY CITIES COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING FOR IMPLEMENTING
THE COORDINATED INTEGRATED MONITORING PROGRAM (CIMP)
FOR THE DOMINGUEZ CHANNEL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA
This Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), made and entered into as of the date of the last
signature set forth below by and between THE SOUTH BAY CITIES COUNCIL OF
GOVERNMENTS (SBCCOG), a California Joint Powers Authority, and THE CITY OF
LOS ANGELES (CITY), a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF CARSON, a municipal
corporation, THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF
HAWTHORNE, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF INGLEWOOD, a municipal
corporation, THE CITY OF LAWNDALE, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF LOMITA,
a municipal corporation, LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
(LACFCD), a body corporate and politic, and the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
(COUNTY), a political subdivision of the State of California.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, for the purpose of this MOA, the term PARTIES shall mean the Cities
of Los Angeles, Carson, El Segundo, Hawthorne, Inglewood, Lawndale, Lomita, Long
Beach, the COUNTY, and the LACFCD; and the term CITY shall mean only the City of
Los Angeles; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (Regional Board),
have classified the Greater Los Angeles County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System
(MS4) as a large MS4 pursuant to 40 CFR section 122.26(b)(4) and a major facility
pursuant to 40 CFR section 122.2; and
WHEREAS, the Regional Board adopted National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System MS4 Permit Order No. R4- 2012 -0175 (MS4 Permit); and
WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit became effective on December 28, 2012, and
requires that the LACFCD, the COUNTY, and 84 of the 88 cities (excluding Avalon, Long
Beach, Palmdale, and Lancaster) within the County comply with the prescribed elements
of the MS4 Permit; and
Page 1 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit identified the PARTIES as MS4 permittees that are
responsible for compliance with the MS4 Permit requirements pertaining to the PARTIES'
collective jurisdictional area in the Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Area as
identified in Exhibit C of this MOA; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES elected voluntarily to collaborate on the development of
an Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP) and a Coordinated Integrated
Monitoring Program (CIMP) in accordance with the MS4 Permit for a portion of the
Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Area as identified in Exhibit C of this MOA
to comply with all applicable monitoring requirements of the MS4 Permit; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES collaboratively prepared a final Scope of Work to obtain
a consultant (Consultant) to assist the PARTIES in the development of a CIMP; and
WHEREAS, the CIMP was submitted to the Regional Board by the PARTIES on
June 26, 2014 and was conditionally approved by the Regional Board on December 11,
2015; and
WHEREAS, the CITY will perform the monitoring services (sample collection, in-
situ measurements, laboratory analyses and analyses reporting - collectively,
"MONITORING SERVICES ") consistent with the requirements of the approved CIMP and
pursuant to the MS4 Permit; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed that the total cost for this MOA shall not
exceed $3,778,613; and.
WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed for the CITY to perform and coordinate the
MONITORING SERVICES on the PARTIES' behalf, and the PARTIES have agreed to
pay the CITY for its MONITORING SERVICES as indicated in Tables 1A -1 E of Exhibit A
of this MOA; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES agree to implement the CIMP per the submitted
schedule, and the CITY may perform some of the MONITORING SERVICES pursuant to
the CIMP prior to the execution of this agreement by all PARTIES; and
WHEREAS, the CITY retains the right to outsource some or all of the elements of
the MONITORING SERVICES, at a cost not to exceed those shown in Tables 1A -1 E of
Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES desire to have the SBCCOG: (a) invoice and collect
funds from each of the PARTIES to cover the costs of MONITORING SERVICES and
pay the CITY; (b) administer this MOA; and (c) negotiate, enter into agreements with, and
collect funds from individual NPDES permit holders for cost - sharing of MONITORING
SERVICES as described in Section 7(e);
Page 2 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed to cooperatively share and fully fund the
estimated costs of the implementation of the CIMP based on the Distributed Cost
contained in Tables 1A -1 E of Exhibit A of this MOA; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES agree that each shall assume full and independent
responsibility for ensuring its own compliance with the MS4 Permit despite the
collaborative approach of the MOA; and
WHEREAS, individual NPDES permit holders that are not PARTIES may wish to
participate in the MONITORING SERVICES for individual permit compliance; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES contemplate allowing such individual NPDES permit
holders to participate in the MONITORING SERVICES without being a party to this MOA,
in order to minimize the costs of preparing and implementing the CIMP to each of the
PARTIES; and
WHEREAS, the SBCCOG can enter into individual separate agreements with such
individual NPDES permit holders (which shall not become parties to this MOA) for
MONITORING SERVICES cost sharing purposes only; and
WHEREAS, if other individual NPDES permit holders participate in the cost sharing
relating to the MONITORING SERVICES, the PARTIES contemplate that the cost sharing
table in Exhibit A will be modified as appropriate and each PARTY's proportional payment
obligation reduced accordingly to reflect other individual NPDES permit holders'
payments.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by the
PARTIES, and of the promises contained in this MOA, the PARTIES, and SBCCOG agree
as follows:
Section 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and fully
incorporated into this MOA.
Section 2. Purpose, The purpose of this MOA is to cooperatively fund the MONITORING
SERVICES of the Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Area Group CIMP and
to authorize the SBCCOG to administer the cost sharing.
Section 3. Cooperation, The PARTIES and the SBCCOG shall fully cooperate with
one another to attain the purposes of this MOA.
Section 4. Voluntary, This MOA is voluntarily entered into for the implementation of the
CIMP.
Page 3 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
Section 5. Term. This MOA shall become effective on the last date of execution by
either a PARTY or the SBCCOG and shall remain in effect for three (3) years from the
effective date or until June 30th, 2018, or whichever is later. The MOA may be extended,
through an amendment, for an additional three (3) years.
Section 6. Commitment. Once effective, all cooperating PARTIES and the SBCCOG
agree to uphold the promises contained in this MOA for the duration of the agreed upon
term.
Section 7. THE PARTIES AND SBCCOG AGREE:
a. Monitoring Services.: The CITY will perform the MONITORING SERVICES to
support the PARTIES' submittal of the MS4 Permit Annual Report as detailed in
Exhibit D and per the practices found in the approved CIMP. The CITY reserves
the right to modify this MOA, through an amendment approved by all PARTIES,
when conditions, such as, but not limited to, expansion of CIMP requirements,
impact annual costs.
b. Reporting, The CITY will prepare and submit semi- and annual analytical
monitoring reports to the Regional Board as described in the CIMP, as well as
electronic files if requested by the Regional Board. The CITY will distribute copies
of the annual reports to the PARTIES at least seven (7) business days prior to
submittal to the Regional Board. The PARTIES may review and provide comments
prior to submittal to the Regional Board.
c. Invoicing. The SBCCOG will invoice the PARTIES in annual amounts not
exceeding the invoice amounts shown in Table 3 of Exhibit A. The annual invoices
will be issued in July of each calendar year in anticipation of the expected
monitoring cost for the fiscal year. The CITY shall provide SBCCOG an accounting
of the MONITORING SERVICES completed during each annual payment term by
October 31 st of the following year. The PARTIES will form a subcommittee to verify
the accounting, monitoring and other work completed and the amount of the
invoices before the SBCCOG remits payment back to CITY.
d. Additional Studies, The PARTIES agree that conducting additional watershed -
wide special studies, monitoring with other watershed groups, conducting
necessary special studies, preparing grant applications, and /or conducting other
collaborative activities for the purpose of complying with the MS4 Permit may be
funded by the PARTIES subject to the terms of this MOU, provided that there are
available excess contract funds or contingency funds available to fund these
activities. Prior to the performance of any such activities, all PARTIES must
provide written approval of the activities and revised Tables 1A -1E of Exhibit A
showing which PARTIES will be funding the activities and in what amounts.
Page 4 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
e. Additional NPDES Permit Holders Participating in Cost __Sharing, The PARTIES
contemplate allowing other individual NPDES permit holders to participate in the
MONITORING SERVICES without being a party to this MOA, in order to minimize
the costs of preparing and implementing the CIMP to each of the PARTIES. In the
event that another NPDES permit holder wants to participate in the MONITORING
SERVICES, the SBCCOG may enter into an individual separate agreement with
such individual NPDES permit holder (which shall not become a party to this MOA)
for MONITORING SERVICES cost sharing purposes. If other individual NPDES
permit holders participate in the cost sharing relating to the MONITORING
SERVICES, the cost sharing tables in Exhibit A shall be modified as appropriate
and each PARTIES' proportional payment obligation reduced accordingly to reflect
other individual NPDES permit holders' payments. The cost share breakdown will
be updated in the watershed for which the NPDES Permit Holder is joining, i.e. if
a NPDES Permit Holder is located in the Dominguez Channel Watershed, only
PARTIES in the Dominguez Channel Watershed will realize a reduction in
payment.
Section 8. Payment,
a. Annual IPa meat. The PARTIES shall pay the SBCCOG for their proportional share
of the estimated cost for MONITORING SERVICES and SBCCOG fees as shown
in Table 2 of Exhibit A, within sixty (60) days of receipt of the invoice from the
SBCCOG. The SBCCOG will remit payment to the CITY within sixty (60) days of
receipt of payments from the other PARTIES, noting any delinquent payments that
remain due after deducting the SBCCOG's administrative five percent (5 %) fee as
set forth in Table 2 of Exhibit A and six hundred fifteen dollars ($615) per individual
permittee agreement.
b. Contin encv, The CITY and the SBCCOG will attempt to notify the PARTIES if
actual expenditures for MONITORING SERVICES are anticipated to exceed the
cost estimates contained in Exhibit A. Inasmuch, the MONITORING SERVICES
may be adaptable to sampling events during an event that may preclude the CITY
from notifying the PARTIES, and the CITY may incur cost greater than the contract
estimates contained in Exhibit A. The PARTIES agree to pay the CITY (through
SBCCOG) for their proportional share of these additional expenditures at an
amount not to exceed ten percent (10 %) of their proportional annual cost as shown
in Tables 1A-1E of Exhibit A. Any costs which exceed this ten percent (10 %)
contingency will require an amendment to this MOA.
c. Reconciliation of this MOA. Any unexpended funds held by SBCCOG at the
termination of this MOA will be reimbursed or credited to the PARTIES by the
SBCCOG as requested in writing by each PARTY and in accordance with the
distributed cost formula set forth in Tables 1A -1 E of Exhibit A. At the end of the
MOA, the SBCCOG will provide the PARTIES with an accounting of actual
expenditures within ninety (90) days. .
Page 5 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
d. Late Payment Penalty. Any payment that is not received within sixty (60) days
following receipt of the SBCCOG invoice shall be subject to interest on the original
amount from the date of the invoice at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum.
e. Delin uent Pa rrents. A PARTY's or PARTIES' payment is considered to be
delinquent one hundred eighty (180) days after receipt of the invoice from the
SBCCOG. The following procedure may be implemented to attain payments from
the delinquent PARTY or PARTIES: 1) verbally contact/meet with the manager(s)
from the delinquent PARTY or PARTIES; 2) submit a formal letter to the delinquent
PARTY or PARTIES from SBCCOG counsel; and 3) notify the Regional Board that
the delinquent PARTY or PARTIES are no longer a participating member of the
CIMP. If the PARTY or PARTIES remain delinquent after the above procedures,
then that PARTY's participation in this MOA will be deemed terminated, and the
remaining PARTIES' cost share allocation shall be adjusted in accordance with the
cost allocation formula in Exhibit A.
Section 9. THE PARTIES FURTHER AGREE:
a. Payment. The PARTIES agree to pay the CITY, through the SBCCOG, for the
MONITORING SERVICES not exceeding the amounts shown in Tables 1A -1 E of
Exhibit A, based on the distributed cost formula in Tables 1A-1E of Exhibit A,
attached hereto and made a part of this MOA by this reference.
b. Documentation. The PARTIES agree to provide all requested information and
documentation in their possession and available for release to the CITY that is
deemed necessary by the PARTIES to perform the MONITORING SERVICES at
no cost to the CITY.
c. Each PARTY shall allow reasonable access and entry to the CITY, on an as-
needed basis during the term of this MOA, including but not limited to the PARTY's
storm drains, channels, catch basins, and similar properties (FACILITIES) to
achieve the purposes of this MOA, provided, however, that prior to entering any of
the PARTIES FACILITIES, the CITY shall provide written notice seventy -two (72)
hours in advance of entry to the applicable PARTY, or in the cases where seventy -
two (72) hour advanced notice is not possible, such as in cases of unforeseen wet
weather, as early as reasonably possible. The CITY shall secure any required
necessary permits prior to entry.
d. Each PARTY agrees that due to certain monitoring activities, such as toxicity
testing, the total cost of this MOA is not inclusive of those activities that may be
required to successfully complete the analyses. Thus, the PARTIES agree to fund
the required additional work when the CITY notifies them that the activity has taken
place. The PARTIES agree to pay the CITY (through the SBCCOG) for their
proportional share of these additional expenditures at an amount not to exceed
Page 6 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
their proportional annual cost plus the ten percent (10 %) contingency as shown in
Exhibit A. No PARTY will be obligated to pay for additional expenditures which
exceed this amount absent an amendment to this MOA.
e. Each PARTY agrees that in the course of the MONITORING SERVICES, the
results may require the participating PARTIES to seek technical consultant
services. The total cost of this MOA is not inclusive of these technical consultant
services. Thus, the PARTIES agree to fund the additional work and authorize the
CITY to seek the technical consultant services. The PARTIES agree to pay the
CITY (through the SBCCOG) for their proportional share of these additional
expenditures at an amount not to exceed their proportional annual cost plus the
ten percent (10 %) contingency as shown in Exhibit A. No PARTY will be obligated
to pay for additional expenditures which exceed this amount absent an amendment
to this MOA.
Section 10. Indemnification
a. Each PARTY including the SBCCOG shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless
every other PARTY, including its special districts, elected and appointed officers,
employees, agents, attorneys, and designated volunteers from and against any
and all liability, including, but not limited to, demands, claims, actions, fees, costs,
and expenses (including reasonable attorney's and expert witness fees), arising
from or connected with the respective acts of that PARTY arising from or related
to this MOA; provided, however, that no PARTY shall indemnify another PARTY
for that PARTY's own negligence or willful misconduct.
b. In light of the provisions of Section 895.2 of the Government Code of the State of
California imposing certain tort liability jointly upon public entities solely by reason
of such entities being parties to an agreement (as defined in Section 895 of said
Code), each of the PARTIES hereto, pursuant to the authorization contained in
Sections 895.4 and 895.6 of said Code, shall assume the full liability imposed upon
it or any of its officers, agents, or employees, by law for injury caused by any act
or omission occurring in the performance of this MOA to the same extent such
liability would be imposed in the absence of Section 895.2 of said Code. To
achieve the above stated purpose, each PARTY indemnifies, defends, and holds
harmless every other PARTY for any liability, cost, or expense that may be
imposed upon such other PARTY solely by virtue of said Section 895.2. The
provisions of Section 2778 of the California Civil Code are made a part hereof as
if incorporated herein.
Section 11. Withdrawal
a. Any PARTY including the SBCCOG may withdraw from this MOA for any reason,
in whole or part, by giving the other PARTIES and the Regional Board thirty (30)
days written notice thereof. Withdrawing PARTIES shall remain wholly responsible
Page 7 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
for their share of the costs of MONITORING SERVICES for the extent of the
effective term of this MOA. Each PARTY shall also be responsible for the payment
of its own fines, penalties or costs incurred as a result of the non - performance of
the CIMP. Upon withdrawal by the SBCCOG, the PARTIES shall meet and confer
to designate an alternate organization to accept the SBCCOG's responsibilities
under this MOA.
b. The SBCCOG shall notify in writing all PARTIES within fourteen (14) days of
receiving written notice from any PARTY that intends to terminate this MOA.
c. If a PARTY fails to comply with any of the terms or conditions of this MOA, that
PARTY shall forfeit its rights to the work completed through this MOA, but no such
forfeiture shall occur unless and until the defaulting PARTY has first been given
notice of its default and a reasonable opportunity to cure the alleged default.
Section 12. General Provisions
a. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports relating to this MOA, and any
request, demand, statement, or other communication required or permitted
hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered to the representatives of the
PARTIES and /or SBCCOG at the addresses set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference. PARTIES and SBCCOG shall promptly
notify each other of any change of contact information, including personnel
changes, provided in Exhibit B. Written notice shall include notice delivered via e-
mail or fax. A notice shall be deemed to have been received on (a) the date of
delivery, if delivered by hand during regular business hours, or by confirmed
facsimile or by e-mail; or (b) on the third (3) business day following mailing by
registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) to the addresses set forth in
Exhibit B.
b. Administration. For the purposes of this MOA, the PARTIES including SBCCOG
hereby designate as their respective representatives the persons named in Exhibit
B. The designated representatives, or their respective designees, shall administer
the terms and conditions of this MOA on behalf of their respective entities. Each
of the persons signing below on behalf of a PARTY or the SBCCOG represents
and warrants that he or she is authorized to sign this MOA on behalf of such entity.
c. Relationship of the Parties. The parties to this MOA are, and shall at all times
remain as to each other, wholly independent entities. No party to this MOA shall
have power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of any other party
unless expressly provided to the contrary by this MOA. No employee, agent, or
officer of a party shall be deemed for any purpose whatsoever to be an agent,
employee, or officer of another party.
Page 8 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
d. Bindinq Effect. This MOA shall be binding upon, and shall be to the benefit of the
respective successors, heirs, and assigns of each party to this MOA; provided,
however, no party may assign its respective rights or obligations under this MOA
without the prior written consent of the other parties.
e. Amendment. The terms and provisions of this MOA may not be amended,
modified, orwaived, except by an instrument in writing signed by all non - delinquent
PARTIES and the SBCCOG. Such amendments may be executed by those
individuals listed in Exhibit B or by a responsible individual as determined by each
PARTY.
Law to Govern. This MOA is governed by, interpreted under, and construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In the event of
litigation related to this MOA, venue in the state trial courts shall lie exclusively in
the County of Los Angeles.
g. No Presumption-in Draftinq, The parties to this MOA agree that the general rule
that an MOA is to be interpreted against the party drafting it, or causing it to be
prepared shall not apply.
h. Severabilitv. If any provision of this MOA shall be determined by any court to be
invalid, illegal, or unenforceable to any extent, then the remainder of this MOA shall
not be affected, and this MOA shall be construed as if the invalid, illegal, or
unenforceable provision had never been contained in this MOA.
Entire Aqreement. This MOA constitutes the entire agreement of the parties to this
MOA with respect to the subject matter hereof.
j, Waiver. Waiver by any party to this MOA of any term, condition, or covenant of this
MOA shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver
by any party to this MOA of any breach of the provisions of this MOA shall not
constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor a waiver of any subsequent breach
or violation of any provision of this MOA.
k. Counterparts. This MOA may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which shall be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute but one
and the same instrument, provided, however, that such counterparts shall have
been delivered to all parties to this MOA.
All parties to this MOA have been represented by counsel in the preparation and
negotiation of this MOA. Accordingly, this MOA shall be construed according to
its fair language. Any ambiguities shall be resolved in a collaborative manner by
the PARTIES and SBCCOG and shall be rectified by amending this MOA as
described in Section 12(e).
Page 9 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES and SBCCOG hereto have caused this
MOA to be executed by their duly authorized representatives and affixed as of the date
of signature of the PARTIES:
Page 10 of 33
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
"4
By W .G
—GAIL FAh BER, Director of Public Works
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mary C. Wickham
County Counsel
By.... . . .... . ... .
.. .. .. ............ . - --------
Deputy
Page 11 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
Date
1 2,
Date
LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
By
—, A� , L . F'A' b'fff Chief Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mary C. Wickham
County Counsel
By
. ..................
Deputy
Page 12 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
Date
Date
CITY OF CARSON
By
KEN—NE44 d-.—F'Al'N—G, "
City Manager
'","
By
City C'lerk,
APPROVE
I t,
City Aft
TO FORM:
Agreement No. 5010
z/(
Date
Date V-� - .
C
L4
Agreement No. 5010
ATTEST:
l`rwer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By ul � r ( for
ti rk Hen l
City Attorney
Page 14 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
CITY OF LAWNDALE
Date- 17 By:
Pullen-Miles
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
T1111-11 J.1-la'l
City Attorney
01001.0001/292607.1 Page 15 of 33
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Date: JUN 9 2016
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michael N. Feuer
City Attorney
Agreement No. 5010
Page 16 of 33
CITY OF H!AWTH!ORNE
.. .... ..
p,d
f yi'
Arnold Shadbehr
Interim City Manager
ATTEST:
w
Ilor rc IHuber
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: If
Russell Miyahir,
City Attorney
Page 17 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
CITY OF INGLEWOOD
Date: If
ATTEST:
i
Horton
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
a
Kenneth R. Campos
City Attorney
Agreement No. 5010
By:^
Jam("�,s,' . But ts .. ...� ._ .:.�:...._.....__�_
, Jrw�
Mayor
Page 18 of 33
CITY OF LOMITA
Date:
ATTEST:
Sandra Medina
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
City Attou y
Agreement No. 5010
By:w
_..,..
ij azeley
1°a or
Page 19 of 33
South Bay Cities Council of Governments
Date:
ATTEST:
By:
suzg6ne Charles
Administrative Officer
APPROVED AS TO
M
K66'6el Jenking,"-
.00C
Counsel for the SBC("
By:
Jill G ley
i
Ghl i r
Page 20 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
Agreement No. 5010
EXHIBIT A
Dominguez Channel Enhanced Watershed Management Area CIMP
able 1A. CIMP Im} lementation Cost
_....
Dominguez Channel Watershed Management
Area CIMP Summary
Table
Costs
(Shared Items)
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Total over 3
Agency
15 -16
16 -17
17 -18
years
Total Cost of DC WMA CIMP
$1,148,989
$1,269,477
$1,161,166
$3,579,632
LACFCD
$63,232
$69,372
$63,959
$196,562
City of Los Angeles
$439,786
$478,175
$447,396
$1,365,357
County of Los Angeles
$167,046
$198,508
$185,430
$550,984
City of El Segundo
$25,364
$22,722
$17,327
$65,414
City of Inglewood
$78,681
$70,485
$53,748
$202,914
City of Hawthorne
$78,836
$70,624
$53,853
$203,314
City of Lomita
$26,325
$70,884
$86,751
$183,960
City of Lawndale
$25,513
$22,856
$17,428
$65,797
City of Carson
$244,206
$265,850
$235,274
$745,330
Total Cost = Universal Costs (Shared Items) + Dominguez Channel
Watershed
Costs + Machado
Lake Watershed
Costs + LA
Harbor Costs
$153,859
City of Lomita
1,227.70
2.41%
Table 113. Universal CIMP Costs
Universal
Costs
(Shared Items)
Area
% of Total
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Total over 3
Agency
(acres)
Area
15 -16
16 -17
17 -18
years
Universal Costs (shared)
50,886.10
100%
$826,506
$719,725
$571,317
$2,117,548
LACFCD1
--
$41,325
$35,986
$28,566
$105,877
City of Los Angeles
9,243.21
37.82%
$296,926
$258,564
1 $205,248
$760,738
County of Los Angeles -.
8,140.91
16.00%
$125,616
$109,387mmmimm
mmmmmmm$86,831
$321,833
�,5
City of El Segundo
1,252.18
°
2.46%
$19,321
$16,825
$13,3 56
$49,502
City of Inglewood
-
3,884.28
mm.....
7.63%
m....
$59,935
$52,192
$41,430
$153,557
City of Hawthorne
3,891.93
7.65%
$60,053
$52,294
$41,511
$153,859
City of Lomita
1,227.70
2.41%
$18,944
$16,496
$13,095
$48,534
City of Lawndale
11259.51
2.48%
$19,434
$16,924
$13,434
$49,792
City of Carson
11,986.38
23.56%
$184,952
$161,057
$127,847
$473,855
1 LACFCD is responsible for 5% of the Universal Costs, which is subtracted before distributing the cost among the other agencies.
Page 21 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
i Channel
able Dom in uez
Watershed
...a.._...
Mon'torin
...�9.�
Costs
- __�.,,,,.
Area / of Total Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year
Dominguez
Channel
Watershed
.%
Monitoring
Cost Distribution
Watershed Monitoring' 5,669.61 100% $36,318
Area
of Total
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Total over 3
Agency
(acres)
Area
15 -16
16 -17
17 -18
years
Dominguez Channel
City of Lomita 1,212.93 2 $7,381
1.39%
$54,388 $73,657
$135,426
Wilmington Drain Bed Sediment Monitoring
Monitoring
33,785.82
100%
$171,636
$167,496
$112,781
$451,913
LACFCD1
-
z LACFCD is responsible for 5% of Machado Lake Watershed Monitoring cost which is subtracted before distributing the cost
$8,582
$8,375
$5,639
$22,596
City of Los Angeles
5,986.68
17.72%
$28,892
$28,195
$18,985
$76,073
County of Los Angeles
6,755.80
20.00%
$32,604
$31,818
-
$21,424
$85,846
City of El Segundo
1,252.18
3.71%
$6,043
$5,897
$3,97 1
$15,911
City o Inglewood
_ -
3,884 28
-- - - -_._
11 50%
46
$18, ?...
18,294
...... . - - -- -
$ 12,31.
-- .. 8
$49 358
-
City of Hawthorne
1 3,891.93
11.52%
$18,783
$18,330
$12,342
$49,455
City of Lawndale
1,259.51
3.73%
$6,079
$5,932
$3,994
$16,005
City of Carson
10,755.44
31.83%
$51,907
$50,655
$34,108
$136,670
LACFCD is responsible for 5 °0
esponsib
.o f r... .,
he Dominguez
....... _
Channel Watershed
Cost which
--
is subtracted
before distributing
.. ...........m.....,..,,. _
the cost
among the other agencies.
able 1D. Machado Lake Watershed Monitoring Costs
Machado Lake Watershed Monitoring Cost Distribution
_.... _o.........._ ....
Area / of Total Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year
Total over 3
Agency (acres) Area 15-16
......._uu �..........__...........a
I
16-17 17 -18
years
_ mITITIT mIT
Machado Lake
Watershed Monitoring' 5,669.61 100% $36,318
$267,606 $362,415
$666,339
LACFCD2 - $1,816
$13,380 $18,121
$33,317
City of Los Angeles 1,998.43 35.25% $12,161
$89,610 $121,357
$223,128
County of Los Angeles 1,250.88 22.06% $7,612
$56,089 $75,961
$139,663
City of Carson 1,207.37 21.30% $7,347
....._..�., w .� -.....
$54,138 $73,319
$134,805
..- ..- ..__.__.......,...�w_
City of Lomita 1,212.93 2 $7,381
1.39%
$54,388 $73,657
$135,426
Wilmington Drain Bed Sediment Monitoring
(LACFCD)3 $6,087
$6,209 $6,211
$18,506 1
'Machado Lake Watershed Monitoring includes: In -Lake monitoring for the Nutrients
& Toxics TMDLs, Non - Stormwater Outfall
Screening & Monitoring, Stormwater Outfall Monitoring In Project 510 and 77 drains, and Dry & Wet Weather monitoring in
Wilmington Drain.
z LACFCD is responsible for 5% of Machado Lake Watershed Monitoring cost which is subtracted before distributing the cost
among the other agencies.
3 LACFCD is responsible for 100% of Wilmington Drain Bed Sediment Monitoring
Page 22 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
Monitorinq Costs
o�e�� ��n�r�nm��r Watershed 15-16 16-17 17-18 years
LA Harbor Monitoring Cost Distribution
Area % of Tota I Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Total over 3
Age (acres) Area
LA Harbor Monitoring 11,392.33 100% $108,�44,2 $108,442 $108,442 $325,326
City of Los Angeles 11,258.10 98.82% $101,806 $101,806 $101,806 $305,418
County of Los Angeles 134.23 LL18% $1,214 $1,214 $1,214 $3,641
^LAcpoD is responsible for smnf the cA Harbor Cost, which is subtracted before distributing the cost among the other agencies.
Notes:
cA Harbor Monitoring includes the cost vf monitoring the Main Ship Channel (+w/o7).
Monitoringfor the LA Harbor Bacteria TMDL at Cabrillo Beach (CB-01 and CB-02) isU,ezolenspongbm,vuyo,yvyLu,xnge/es
and is not covered /o this /wnw.
xvon/uonwo/hr the Greater Harbors portion vy the Dominguez Channel nnxonmnL isfuodod under o separate xv0x.
Table 2 South Bay Cities Council
FY 15-16
CIMP Implementation Invoice
Amount per year $1,148,989
SBCCOG Contract Management
S8CCOG Attorney Fee
FY 16-17
$l'Z69477
$63'474
$S'08O
FY 17-18
$5,000
Total
ie
, -ihe'S13CCOG yearly attorney fee will be $5,000. The attorney fee is doubled for FY15-16 to account for costs in developing
Page 23 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
Table 3. Invoice Schedule: SBCCOG to invoice Agencies
Agency
Invoice Date
Date
...........................
January 20161
�..._ .....
All costs incurred for FY 14 -15 and FY 15 -16
January 20161,2
July 2016 a
July 2017 4
LACFCD
$66,604.34
$72,795.61
$67,111.62
City of Los Angeles
$464,017
$502,775
$470,050
County of Los Angeles
$177,297
$208,915
$195,014
City of El Segundo
$26,941
$24,323
1 $18,801
City of Inglewood
$83,572
$75,451
$58,320
City of Hawthorne
$83,737
$75,600
$58,435
City of Lomita
$27,871
$72,453
$88,197
City of Lawndale
$27,099
$24,466
$18,911
City of Carson
$259,300
$281,173
$249,385
Total
$1,216,438
$1,337,951
$1,224,224
u This Includes the cost for monitoring preparation and FY 15 -16
2 Or upon execution of this agreement, whichever is later
3 This includes all costs for FY 16 -17
° This includes all costs for FY 17 -18
Table 4. City of Los Angeles Invoice Schedule to SBCCOG
........ ..._....... ..... __.
Invoice Date
Period of Work
...........................
January 20161
�..._ .....
All costs incurred for FY 14 -15 and FY 15 -16
July 2016: .
.....................
µJuly
Between 7/1/2016 to 6/30/2017
µµBetween
2017:
7/1/2017 to 6/30/2018
1 Or upon execution of
this agreement, whichever is later
Page 24 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
EXHIBIT B
Dominguez Channel Enhanced Watershed
Management Area CIMP
Responsible Agencies Representatives
and SBCCOG Contact
- .............. .,
Agency Address
......
Agency Contact
City of Los Angeles -
ShahramKharaghani��
Department of Public Works
E -mail: Shah ram, Khara
Bureau of Sanitation, Watershed Protection Division
Phone: (213) 485- 0587��
1149 S. Broadway
Fax: (213) 485 -3939
Los Angeles, CA 90015
��
County of Los Angeles
Angela
George
Department of Public Works
E-mail:
Watershed Management Division, 11th Floor
Phone: (626) 458- 4304�ryy . ...__..
900 South Fremont Avenue
Fax: (626) 457 -1526
Alhambra, CA 91803 -1331
..... __ ..........................
Los Angeles County Flood Control District
.... .... . ................ _
Angela George
Department of Public Works
E- mail: ,,M
Watershed Management Division, 11 th Floor
Phone: (626) 458 -4304
900 South Fremont Avenue
Fax: (626) 457 -1526
Alhambra, CA 91803 -1331
City of Carson -
Kenneth C. Farfsing, Interim City
Office of the City Manager
Manager
701 E. Carson Street
E-mail: kfarfsinq(a)carscn.ca.us
�5
Carson, CA 90749
Phone: 310 83�
( ) -7261
City of E�.Se- gundo........
Lifan Xu
350 Main Street
E-mail: Ixu el oir�
El Segundo, CA 90245 -3895
Phone: (310) 524 -2368
..... ...............................
City of Hawthorne
..____ _ _....- ...............
Doug Krauss
4455 West 126th Street
E -mail: dkaaLr. ,�sj.za ai /ofh,3WthCX'ne cry
Hawthorne, CA 90250 -4482
Phone: (310) 349 -2987
Arnold Shadbehr, P.E., Interim City
Manager
E-mail:ItmI➢flaR ^i?° i�futr�e rbf.
Phone: (310) 349 -2980
Page 25 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
ity of Inglewood
Lauren Amimoto
1 W. Manchester Blvd. 3rd Floor
ErnaH' ,�im�rnoto(
Inglewood, CA 90301-1750
Phone: (310) 412-5192
FAX: (310) 412-5552
Louis A. Atwell, Public Works Director
�E aiaH-
Phone: (310) 4 1 2 -53 3
ity of Lawndale
...........
Steve Mand6d
Office of the City Manager
Ema�[: sr'na rid o �aw n d a lec� �'vr,o � �.4
'0_fbF37_1-3"_2'_0__2 ... ....
14717 Burin Avenue
........ . ...... .
Phone:
Lawndale, CA 90260
Fax: (310) 371-8877
f �orn "I i 11 t 11 a "I'l"----.------�—�-11,11111111-111-11
Mark McAvoy,_Pu'R�cWorks Director
24300 Narbonne Avenue
E-mail: �'C'
Lomita, CA 90717
Phone: (310) 325-7110 ext. 210
South Bay Council of Governments
Jacki Bacharach
20285 S. Western Ave., #100
Eff4i�l� J1a(..,Jk�1(-(, �.;outhbay6��es
Torrance, CA 90501
............................. ............................... . .......
Phone: (310) 293-2612
... . .........
Page 26 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
EXHIBIT C
Dominguez Channel Enhanced Watershed Management Area Group
.. ..... ....... .
. ..... .... . . . ...... ............ ... "� �., t� llrpa�pp p ����T�muuo "o�,m�..
w �"�'MwIA+'�uma�,�r,li p
116 r
SAN",
gp
Imam
ti to
f �
° 'n
r.
r
Y11n+-
IV
a nnallarn� r Al
r ✓ ✓
u �✓ n��� /
a�
L GE lido 'l '' � 'rQ / i r r ✓ 1
r/
PItlMIW�Yk I[WJ�"�ra*�udw 2 d0.dNH1R' of � I f Ora / /
'N.umw.mr�aa r% r�� r r i
/r /G f
r ii,u r��� err ✓ ✓`'i �" /. �In @r / r� r ��
a 1 �. .- r °s ^n lk 1 ✓� r /✓ � r � � � "r r � r�
&°z n.,rN.,..: :.».,. ���,u e ,��, '� a (dik �aFn„ fir,!✓ r r��
n w ory f/ °,f✓�rhrl ' r ✓ / /
F,Ae �I� /�
n, ✓ a / r / rn a
n'NU' uIP ieu 'tip r iNJINN'a �: / l 1 �r i l w� ✓/ /
E A4 ^
yr �1(�� "es7" /V ✓d, r'
nrA a Il.lri nwwguie n lwm* "fi r , r �' /✓ . 4
Ids r� r'wN'rmw 01,11id r J r POW
IMU Omrnronmimo �� ��^."�'.N dl'wd 4r
f N 4ltlllma4Om ', Aimsi� knmt, rf I a
sari. �mwZINboVi
a
n
CA I I d
w°p sM.,.;;5 ur _71771f,17 ,. w, ipn la���e6
ar
IN" nuw me "' t �
"Amd & y
r,,;�a", �runa,.,ann� ,r v.:�r uw,r :rroww✓',��w,��. n.
now_=' Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Area Group
Y
m IIM N f AI M/fn. CON bll6lr4�vf- FdMTL YP IEWun-Y
••
11N wiwrvN" I I %e.� ; m m.( .� °w 0 .,, Iw.• ✓ ma o�I, yd(N Yn f n l/<A; 7MpS q Y' 6 vud .A oa ,:tiY�1 iM1"�i %P
I'll J
p�'nll YCrt',
tit
Agreement No. 5010
EXHIBIT D
Detail of Monitoring Services to support the PARTIES submittal of the MS4 Permit
Annual Report
rogram Contact Information
Permittee PermWittee Program Supervisor o , d 'eB�
i
Title irk r�'� °h w'&t rau�rP ^��uz"rs�Pfs•�
Address
. t Co' de
Phone Fax Number I
XVIII.A.1. Stormwater Control Measures
Effective Im ervious ..
Area (acres)
Dec. 28, 2012_...__
(baseline) i
Dec. 28, 2013
Dec. 2$, 2014 —....
._._._-_ _...._._.N.N. ..._.. ..... ���.....��. .� ................
Dec. 28, 2015
�... __ m_. ...................................... ............�.�................ _,....,._... ....................,.....
Dec. 28, 2016
........_
TOTAL
FISCAL YEAR
........
2013/2014
Num. of Projects�Num. of Projects Acres of Effective Est. Total Runoff
Constructed that reduced or impervious Area Volume retain
disconnected disconnected from onsite
impervious area MS4
from
New Development Projects
I � 7
�0g
(k)
r
��4 k
Redevelo ment Projects
_ _ ...�,.. _.,�,�. ... ........................
(a) 45 4
O
Other Pro ects that - nt—erc e t _
_ ....... _ . -------- .. _.._ ........._ ...a
runoff
Riparian buffer /wetland
restoration projects
Watershed TMDL related
projects
(a) Los Angeles River
(b) Ballona Creek
(c) Santa Monica Bay
(d) Marina del Rey
(e) Dominguez
TOTAL
..f........�. _.._ ....
Summary of other � MC.. Ms
implemented
Page 28 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
EXHIBIT D
XVIII.A.2. Effectiveness Assessment of Storm Water Control Measures
Rainfall Summary
FISCAL YEAR 2013 / 2014
- — __ __.....__ .... ......... ............
.
Total No. of Storm Events
.................................................................._........................ ...............................
Highest Volume Event (in /24 hr)
Highest No. of C__������'n� s� e' cutive days of...ai.....���.....-
_ _Con s ra'nfall
i Total Rainfallmm
Rainfall: Stormwater Outfall & Wet- weather Receiving Water Monitoring Events
Event
Date
Storm start
Storm
Highest storm
TOTAL
Span between
time
Duration
intensity -
Storm
sample event
15min
Volume
& previous
storm event
(XX /XX /XXXX)
(AM/PM)
(hrs)
(in /hr)
(in)
(hr)
Provide hydrographs or flow data of pre- and post - control activity for the 85th percentile, 24 -hour rain event, if available,
if control measures were designed to reduce impervious cover or storm water peak flow and flow duration.
Comparison of reference watershed flow duration curve and flow duration curve for subwatershed under current
conditions.
L J
), 1 f jj I,,...L j^
ASSESSMENT: Quality of storm water discharges as measured at designed outfalls is improving, staying the same or
declining.
Page 29 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
[W.001 we
ASSESSMENT: Wet- weather receiving water quality within the jurisdiction of the Permittee is improving, staying the same
or declining, when normalized for variations in rainfall patterns.
STATUS: Multi -year efforts, including TMDL implementation (no Trash TMDL), that were not completed in the current year
and will continue into the subseauent vear(sl.
l '1
r
h
STATUS: Multi -year efforts for Trash TMDL that were not completed in the current year and will continue into the
subseauent vear(s).
Page 30 of 33
EXHIBIT D
XVIII.A.3. Non -Storm Water Control Measures
Agreement No. 5010
..............................................
...........m................... ..._
Significant
Non- Stormwater Discharges �,....,...,.....r .
.
Subwatershed
No. of
No. of
N
Total No. of
Confirmed .....................
Outfalls m .
major
outfalls
outfalls
outfalls
screen
screen since
Total TotalTotal No. Total No.
Dec. 28,
Identified attributed Abated being
2012
to allowable monitored
sources
2
STATUS: Multi -year efforts, including TMDL implementation, that were not completed in the current year and will continue
into the subsequent year(s).
_!
XVIII.A.4. Effectiveness Assessment of Non -Storm Water Control Measures
ASSESSMENT: Whether receiving water quality within the jurisdiction of the Permittee is impaired, improving, staying the
same or declining during dry- weather conditions.
ASSESSMENT: Effectiveness of the Permittee(s) control measures in effectively prohibiting non -storm water discharges
through the MS4 to the receiving water.
STATUS: multi -year efforts that were not completed in the current year and will continue into the subsequent
r��,l1f1'1I IN i(�x'71�l
Page 31 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
XV.111,X6, Adaptive Management Strategj�q '
Detailed description of control measures to be applied to New Development or Re-development projects disturbing more
than 50 acres.
Page 32 of 33
EXHIBIT D
XVIII.A.5.
Integrated Monitoring
Compliance
ReDort
Monitoring
ID Exceeclances
............... .
If aquatic toxicity
..........
Description of
. . . ...........
Data
Section XILF &G
was confirmed and
of IVIRP
Mitigation Effort
Efforts for
Efforts to
a TIE was
Taken
Exceeclances
determine cause or
conducted
contribute to
exceeclances
Outfall-
Based on:
ID toxic chemicals
Describe efforts to
To address storm
Description of
based storm
RWL water
as determined by
mitigate and/or
water discharges that
efforts that were
water
s
limitations
the TIE.
eliminate all non-
exceeded one or more
takein to determine
Wet
wate:tquality-
include all relevant
tortr, water
applicable water
whetheir &schairges
based effluent
data to allow the
discharges that
quality based effluent
hoirn the Mitt
weather
limitations
RB to review the
exceeded one or more
limitations, or caused
caused or
receiving
nonstorm
adequacy and
applicable water
or contributed to
conu,,� ' buted to Ih,,.,.
water
water action
indings of the TIE.
quality based effluent
Aquatic Foxicitv.
oXce�,.dances.
Dry weather
levels
f
Ii m i tat iona_non-5torrn
Afl effcva, eh at w,,rja
receiving
aquatic
Shall include:
water ac' .n levels, or
talen V",,
water
toxicity
• sample date
rain, "d OV
dl,; char)7r' of
Non-storm—
thresholds
■ sample start & end
lo
pokita"r,10 the
water
time
M'.'J
All sample results
0 sample type (flow-
ec"�I
rM W 5 r
outfall
that exceeded
weighted
one or more
composite, grab, or
ex r 'ee d" - "'h'y
applicable
field measurement)
thresholds shall
sample location(s)
be readily
as depicted on the
identified.
map
the parameters
analytical results
71
applicable
limitation
. ... . . . . . . . . . . .. ........... .. .....
XV.111,X6, Adaptive Management Strategj�q '
Detailed description of control measures to be applied to New Development or Re-development projects disturbing more
than 50 acres.
Page 32 of 33
Agreement No. 5010
EXHIBIT D
Status of all multi ear efforts that were not completed in the current year and will continue i t
y l� ue into the subsequent
XVIII.A.7. S!Mpoafm, , Data and Information
Example of Excel spreadsheet column headers that would need to be prepared and submitted with Annual
Report.
Paramete
r Value Unrt Analytical Station Watershed - � �_-
Sample
Method ID Type Start End
Time Time
["'6a—te
14.. Cu 4 m9 /I SM- ? ??....... _LA 1 . LAR ^grab. 1........ 1 ..
5:30 19:45 45
KVi1l.A.2. Rainfall: Stormwater Outfall & Wet - weather Receiving Water Monitoring Events
(Date field must be linked to a database summarizing the weather data already prepared)
... ......................._....._. _ __._....._..._.
Permittee may at its option, provide an additional detailed summary table describing control measures that are not
otherwise described in the reporting requirements.
Page 33 of 33