CONTRACT 4133B CLOSEDSECOND AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT NO. 4133 BETWEEN
THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND
RBF CONSULTING
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT ( "Amendment ") is made and entered into this 13th day of
February 2013, by and between CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a general law city and municipal
corporation existing under the laws of California ( "City "), and RBF Consulting, a California
Corporation ( "Consultant ").
L Pursuant to Section 33 of Agreement No. 4133, Section 1 is amended to read as
follows:
"1. CONSIDERATION,
A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work
listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, below;
B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by
the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement;
C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a sum
not to exceed five hundred ninety eight thousand seven hundred twenty
one dollars ($598,721) for CONSULTANT's services. CITY may modify
this amount as set forth below. Unless otherwise specified by written
amendment to this Agreement, CITY will pay this sum as specified in the
attached Exhibit "A," which is incorporated by reference."
2. Pursuant to Section 33 of Agreement No. 4133, Section 2 is amended to read as
follows:
"2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
A. CONSULTANT will perform services listed in the attached Exhibit "B,"
which is incorporated herein.
B. CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor,
technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies
and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space
and facilities, and all tests, testing and analyses, calculation, and all other
means whatsoever, except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be
furnished by CITY, necessary or proper to perform and complete the work
and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this
Agreement."
3. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will
be an original, but all of which together constitutes one instrument executed on the
same date.
i i�jj
4. Except as modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of Agreement
No. 4133 remain the same.
C`1T EL (i RBF Consulting
W
Greg eatil;agcr :e�tlt � Glenn 1.41oie
City Vice President, Planning and Environmental
Services
ATTEST:
Michael J. Burlke,,'
(ity Clerk Executive Vice P'lesi(lent
APPRC
MARK
Taxpayer ID No. 95- 2247293
P:\Planning & Building Safety \0 Planning - Old \Consultant Ping Services\Environmental Consultants\RBF\Raytheon \2013 -02 -11
Second Amendment to RBF Contract #4133.doc
Exhibit A
Budget
G,L. = Glenn Lajoie E T. = Eddie Torres R.B, = Richard Beck MA, = Margil Allen
C M. = Collelle Morse B,M.. =Bob Matson RK, = Rebecca Kinney J = Jeremy Franzini
R.G, = Rita Garcia P,M =Paul Martin Ch,M. = Charlie Marr G.A =Graphic Artist
JN 10- 107917 • 28 • February 13, 2013
3 34
Exhibit B
Scope of Services
February 13, 2013
Ms. Kimberly Christensen, AICP
Planning Manager
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
350 Main Street
El Segundo, California 90245
4 3 3
JN 10- 107917
Subject: Updated Work Program and Budget to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report
and Provide Specific Plan Review Services for the Raytheon El Segundo South
Campus Specific Plan Project
Dear Ms. Christensen:
RBF Consulting is pleased to submit this Updated Work Program and Budget to the City of El
Segundo to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and provide Specific Plan Review
Services for the Raytheon Ei Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Project. This update is intended
to supersede the current Work Program, dated March 8, 2011 (Professional Services Agreement
4133), the August 30, 2012 Draft Work Program modification and the January 15, 2013 Update. This
submittal also includes an updated schedule based on the project status on February 13, 2013. This
update has been determined necessary due to the following:
• The need to update staff rates due to wage adjustments and increases in direct costs since
the time of execution of the agreement.
• The continued coordination and support services related to the Specific Plan which had not
allocated for in the current agreement.
• On -going meetings /coordination and RBF team member participation at those meetings
which were not allocated for.
• Additional Traffic Analysis.
• Adjustments to the Work Program including Geology /Soils, Hazardous Materials and
Infrastructure review.
The primary intent of this updated Work Program and Budget is to acknowledge tasks that have not
been funded and to re- establish a contingency (20 %) for the balance of the CEQA process. Please
do not hesitate to contact me at 949.855.3663 or at GAL @rbf.com you have any questions
or would like additional information.
Sincerely,
Glenn Lajoie, AIC
Vice President
Community Planning and Environmental Services
PLANNING E DESIGN 0 CONSTRUCTION
14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618 -2027 ■ P.O. Box 57057, Irvine, CA 92619 -7057 ® 949.472.3505 • FAX 949.472.8373
Offices located throughout California, Arizona & Nevada ■ „, www Pffl cxonj ,
3 ,
UPDATED WORK PROGRAM AND BUDGET
FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
Raytheon El Segundo
South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report
and Design Review Services
Prepared for:
City of El Segundo
Submitted by:
RBF Consulting
February 13, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Scope of Work ........................ ..................... _ ...... ., ..,.,.,,1
1.0 Project Scoping,. ........ ......... ........ ......... ....... _ .......... _,...._,.,,1
1.1 Project Kick -Off and Project Characteristics ............. ................................................. 1
1.2 Research and Investigation. ................... .. ....... ......... ,.......... ...,..,1
1.3 Agency Consultation ........... ......... ......... ..,... .,,...... ..........,,1
1.4 Preparation of the Initial Study ........ ......... - ........ .,,..,......1
1.5 Notice of Preparation .............. ......... ,,m,..2
1.6 Scoping Meeting .................. ..,,,,,,......,.,,.. ............. ..,..,
2.0 Preparation of Administrative Draft EIR ........................................................ .............,......,,,.,,,,,.2
2.1
Introduction and Purpose .................................................. .......... ................... ........__2
2.2
Executive Summary ............ ........ - ..... ., .... „ ...,.,...., ..... ..................... .,.,........2
2.3
Project Description ..................................................... ,........ _ ....... ....,.,.....3
2.4
Thresholds of Significance ............................... ......... ___ ............. .. .......................,.....,3
2.5
Cumulative Projects /Analysis........... ,.... ....... ....... ....... ......... ............3
2.6
Environmental Analysis ................... . ....... ....... ,,..., .....,. ....... .,,.,.........,,,.,...,.,3
2.7
Growth Inducement ............................................ _ ........................................ ,............
16
2.8
Alternatives to the Proposed Action ...................................................... .. .......... ___
17
2.9
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ............................. .............................17
2.10
Additional Sections... ....... ____ ........ ........ ......... - ......... ....................,.. ,.,.,.17
3.0 Draft EIR ........ ........ .. .... ........... .... ...... ___ ......... 17
3.1 Preliminary Draft EIR .................................................................... .............................17
3.2 Completion of the Draft EIR ......................................................... .............................18
4.0 Final Environmental Impact Report .......................................................... .............................18
4.1 Response to Comments ...... ......... ......... ......... ...,......,,....,..,. .......,.,18
4.2 Final EIR ................. ....... .. . ...... ......... ......... .. ....................... ..... ....,.,..,18
4.3 Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations-, ... _ ....... .............................18
5.0 Project Coordination and Meetings ............. ............................... ....... _ .................... -18
5.1 Public Notices .......... ......... ......... ......... ............. ,...,.., 18
5.2 Environmental Review Coordination .................... ............. _ ....... . .,,,,..,...,,..,..,...... ,,.,19
5.3 Environmental Review Meetings ... ............................... . .,,,,. ,...,..,,.,.,,,,.,.,...,,19
6.0 Environmental Deliverables .......................... .....20
7.0 Design Review Services ....... ......... ........ ......... ......... .. „ .........,,,.,, ....,,, , _ 21
7.1 Meetings /Coordination with City Staff ........ ......,,,,........... ,..,..,,.21
7.2 Specific Plan and Site Plan Review .... __ ,, _.. ....,...,.21
7.3 Design Review Memorandum ........... .............,,, .,.. .... _ ., ........ ,....,..22
8.0 Project Support Services .................................. _ ........... ...............,............ .......... ....,,............ .22
8.1 Project Meetings ............................................................................ .............................22
8.2 Project Coordination ............................ ....... ................................ ............. __ ... ..,....,...22
8.3 Specific Plan Preparation/ Assistance ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,___,_,___,23
8.4 Traffic Sensitivity Analysis ........................... ........ .............23
9.0 Contingency ............................................................................................... .............................24
II. CEQA Schedule ......... .......... ....... _ ....... ,, ......... ............... .....,... .....,... ......,., .,.,__25
III. Statement of Financial Conditions ......... ......... ..... ...................... ....._......_,. _ ......... ..,...,.,.26
IV, Budget ...... ... ........... ... ......... ...... .................................... ..,28
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
11 SCOPE OF WORK
The following Scope of Work has been prepared based upon information received by RBF
Consulting. The cost estimate, which is itemized according to task and issue, is included in Secti on
IV of this proposal.
1.0 PROJECT SLOPING
1.1 PROJECT KICK -OFF AND PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS (COMPLETED)
The EIR work program will be initiated with a kick -off meeting with City Staff to discuss the project in
greater detail. This initial meeting is vital to the success of the CEQA process and will be a key
milestone in order to confirm the parameters of the analysis, the details of construction proposed
buildout conditions, scheduling and overall communications. Prior to the kick -off, RBF will distribute
a kick -off meeting agenda and detailed memorandum, which will identify information needs. Based
upon the detailed project information obtained at the project kick -off meeting, RBF will draft a
preliminary project description for review and approval by City Staff.
1.2 RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATION (COMPLETED)
RBF will obtain and review available referenced data for the project area, including policy
documentation from the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State and Federal agencies, the
Southern California Association of Governments and all other agencies which may be affected by the
Project. This information, along with environmental data and information available from the City and
other nearby jurisdictions, will become part of the foundation of the EIR and will be reviewed and
incorporated into the analysis, as deemed appropriate. This task includes a visit to the project area,
which will include a detailed photographic recording of on- and off -site conditions.
1.3 AGENCY CONSULTATION (COMPLETED)
As indicated in Section 15083 of the CEQA Guidelines, many public agencies have found that early
consultation solves many potential conflicts that could arise in more serious forms later in the review
process. Although the Notice of Preparation and Public Scoping Meeting will provide that
opportunity, RBF will conduct additional discussions with local, state and federal agencies which will
assist in the early stages of the analysis and issue delineation. This scoping can be an effective way
to bring together and resolve the concerns of affected Federal, State and local agencies as well as
the local community.
1.4 PREPARATION OF THE INITIAL STUDY (COMPLETED)
The Initial Study will include detailed explanations of all checklist determinations and discussions of
potential environmental impacts. The analysis will be prepared in accordance with Public Resources
Code Section 21080(c) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15070. The Initial Study will be structured in
the same format as Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. The Initial Study will contain a description
of the Project, the Project location, and a description of the environmental setting. The main bodyof
the document will consist of a City- approved environmental checklist and an accompanying
environmental analysis. This section will denote the appropriate CEQA action based upon the
Environmental Checklist /Environmental Analysis.
JN 10- 107917 • 1 • February 13, 2013
i 4 9
w i
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
The Project will be analyzed for the potential to create significant environmental impacts in the areas
specified on the City's approved environmental checklist. The Initial Study will also include
mandatory findings of significance, long -term versus short -term goals, cumulative impacts, and direct
and indirect impacts upon human beings.
1.5 NOTICE OF PREPARATION (COMPLETED)
RBF will prepare, distribute and file the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the EIR. A Draft NOP will be
prepared and forwarded to City Staff for review and comment. RBF will then finalize the NOP for
distribution. The distribution will be based on a City- approved distribution list to be provided by City
staff. This task includes certified mailing of approximately fifty (50) notices to affected agencies and
interested parties. Comments received in response to the NOP will be evaluated during the
preparation of the EIR.
1.6 SCOPING MEETING (COMPLETED)
A public scoping meeting, which can also involve Federal, State or other local agencies, will be
scheduled during the NOP public review period, in order that the community can gain an
understanding of the proposed project and provide comments on environmental concerns. The
Scoping Meeting will orient the community on the CEQA review process and will be presented in a
manner which the community can gain a greater understanding of the proposal, intent of CEQA and
the key issue areas to be addressed in the EIR. RBF will provide a PowerPoint presentation,
handouts and presentation -size graphics to supplement the discussion. Following the presentation,
the meeting will be devoted to public participation, questions and comments. Written comment
forms will be provided for this purpose, and these comments, along with oral comments, will become
a part of the administrative record.
2.0 PREPARATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EIR
2.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
The Introduction will cite the provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City of El Segundo
CEQA Implementation procedures for which the proposed project is subject. This section will identify
the purpose of the study and statutory authority as well document scoping procedures, summary of
the EIR format, listing of responsible and trustee agencies and documentation incorporated by
reference.
2.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Executive Summarywill include a Project Summary, an overview of project impacts, mitigation
and levels of significance after mitigation, summary of project alternatives and areas of controversy
and issues to be resolved. The Environmental Summary will be presented in a columnar format.
2.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project Description section of this EIR will detail the project location, background and history of
the project, discretionary actions, characteristics (addressed in Task 1.1), goals and objectives,
construction program, phasing, agreements, and required permits and approvals that are required
based on available information. This section will include a summary of the Project's local
JN 10- 107917 • 2 • February 13, 2013
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
environmental setting for the project. Exhibits depicting the regional and site vicinity will be included
in this section.
2.4 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
This section will provide a comprehensive description of thresholds of significance for each issue
area of the environmental analysis. The significance threshold criteria will be described and will
provide the basis for conclusions of significance. Primary sources to be used in identifying the
criteria include the CEQA Guidelines, local, State, Federal or other standards applicable to an impact
category.
2.5 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS /ANALYSIS (PARTIALLY COMPLETED)
In accordance with Section 15130 of the CEQA Guidelines, the EIR will include a section providing a
detailed listing of cumulative projects and actions under consideration for the analysis. The
likelihood of occurrence and level of severity will be studied. The purpose of the section is to present
a listing and description of projects, past, present and anticipated in the reasonably foreseeable
future, even if those projects are outside of El Segundo's jurisdiction. The potential for impact and
levels of significance are contingent upon the radius or area of interaction with the project area. RBF
will consult with City staff and other applicable local jurisdictions to define the appropriate study area
for the cumulative analysis. The cumulative analysis for each topical area will be incorporated
throughout the analysis in Section 2.6.
2.6 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
RBF will evaluate the necessary information with respect to the existing conditions, the potential
adverse effects of Project implementation (both individual and cumulative), and measures to mitigate
such effects. Environmental issues raised during the scoping process (Notice of Preparation
responses, Public Scoping Meeting, and any other relevant and valid informative sources) will also
be evaluated. The analyses will be based upon all available data, results from additional research,
and an assessment of existing technical data. These analyses will be performed by qualified
Environmental Analysts, CEQA experts and Planners at RBF.
The Environmental Analysis section of the EIR will thoroughly discuss the existing conditions for
each environmental issue area, identify short -term construction and long -term operational impacts
associated with the project and their levels of significance. The impact analysis will be in a
consistent order of environmental factors as Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines (Aesthetics,
Agricultural, Air Quality, etc.). For each Environmental Factor Analysis Section, the Impacts
Subsection will begin with a list of all issues contained in the Initial Study. The thresholds for
significance shall be identified for every environmental issue. A brief discussion will be provided for
all environmental issues determined to be No Impact or Less Than Significant Impact in the Initial
Study, explaining why these determinations were made and that no further analysis in the EIR is
warranted. The Impact Subsection will provide a detailed analysis of each issue determined to be
Less Than Significant With Mitigation incorporated or Potentially Significant Impact in the same order
as these issues are provided in the Initial Study. For each environmental issue requiring EIR
analysis, the EIR will state the level of significance as determined in the Initial Study, and then
provide the analysis discussion, mitigation measures specific to this environmental issue, and level
of significance after mitigation forthat environmental issue. This section will include analysis forthe
following environmental issue areas:
JN 10- 107917 • 3 • February 13, 2013
1 )
RBF's air quality staff will provide a thorough and complete assessment of the Project's air quality
impacts. The proposed Project would result in demolition, construction, and operational - related
emissions of air pollutants. In recognition of the need to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the
project's impacts on air quality, RBF's Air Quality Analysis will quantify project emissions and identify
mitigation measures to reduce potentially significant air quality impacts to the extent feasible. RBF's
analysis will primarily follow guidance contained in the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook. RBF's scope of work for the air quality review includes the
following:
Existinq Conditions. The project is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which is under
the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). RBF will describe
the meteorological conditions and discuss ambient air monitoring data collected at the nearest
monitoring station which is located at the Los Angeles International Airport. A description of the
regulatory framework relating to air quality (i.e., California Clean Air Act, Air Quality Management
Plan, etc.) will also be provided.
Standards and Conditions. A summary of the relevant policies, rules, and regulations from the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the
SCAQMD will be provided.
Sensitive Reports. An overview of the nature and location of existing sensitive receptors will be
provided. The sensitive receptors would include, but not be limited to residences, schools and
churches in the project vicinity.
Demolition /Construction - Related Emissions. Emissions generated due to demolition and
construction activities will be quantified. A general description of the major phases of construction
and their timing will be required. The air pollutant emissions during demolition and construction will
be compared to the SCAQMD Regional and Local Significance Thresholds. RBF will also
qualitatively discuss naturally occurring asbestos impacts.
Operational Air Emissions. RBF will quantify operational emissions then provide a comparison to the
SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance. The emissions will be quantitatively derived utilizing
the EMFAC2007 and URBEMIS2007 models. Primary sources of emissions will be related to area
sources and local /regional vehicle miles traveled. Project consistency with the SCAQMD's 2007Air
Quality Management Plan for the South Coast Air Basin will be evaluated.
Localized Emissions. Consistent with the SCAQMD environmental justice program and Localized
Significance Threshold (LST) methodologies, RBF will identify impacts using SCAQMD's localized
thresholds or the Ambient Air Quality Standards. RBF will identify mitigation measures, if necessary,
to reduce emissions to less than significant levels. Should project traffic warrant Carbon Monoxide
Hotspot modeling, RBF will model intersections utilizing the BREEZE ROADS model. The analysis
will be consistent with the Transportation Project -Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol, prepared by the
Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Davis.
B. Drainage and Water Quality (PARTIALLY COMPLETED)
This task assumes that technical analysis related to drainage and water quality impacts would be
prepared by the Project Applicant. RBF's in -house stormwater specialists will perform a peer review
JN 10- 107917 • 4 • February 13, 2013
City of El Segundo
�. Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
of the Applicant's studies for technical accuracy, consistency with applicable standards, and
defensibility. RBF will review the reports to ensure that the studies contain a review of existing
documentation, watershed boundary delineation, existing conditions analysis, analysis of proposed
hydrology, analysis of proposed drainage facilities, floodplain impacts, water quality impacts (WQMP)
and NPDES requirements.
This scope includes two rounds of peer review of the hydrology and water quality study and two
comment memos based on the review. After the first round of peer review, a second round would be
performed in order to confirm that initial comments were adequately addressed.
Utilizing the finalized drainage and water quality reports, this impact section will address changes in
absorption rates, drainage patterns, storm drain improvement, and downstream affects. RBF will
also evaluate water quality conditions and identify water quality ( NPDES) techniques /structures in
accordance with local, State and Federal requirements. The potential for the project to degrade
water quality, interfere with groundwater recharge or expose people to water related hazards will be
identified.
C. Geology and Soils (PARTIALLY COMPLETED)
Geologist D. Scott Magorien will undertake an EIR -level geotechnical investigation for the project.
The March 8, 2011 Proposal (Section 2.6.C, Geology and Soils) included a scope of work and
budget for Mr. Magorien to conduct a technical peer review of an Applicant - prepared geotechnical
document. The Proposal also included as an optional task a scope of work and budget for D. Scott
Magorien to undertake an EIR -level geotechnical investigation (Section 8.1, Geology and Soils
Technical Review).
The following geotechnical /other documents were provided by the City /Applicant for D. Scott
Magorien's review:
• Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Three Potential Building Sites (including Plates and
Tables), Rybak Inc., December 14, 2005.
• Sepulveda /Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza El Segundo Development Draft EIR,
Christopher A. Joseph & Associates, October 2004:
- Section IV.E, Geology and Soils, and
- Appendix G, Geology Reports.
• Conceptual Grading Engineering Analysis.
• Preliminary Project Description.
• Tentative Tract Map Scan, April 17, 2012.
• Conceptual Site Master Plan, December 4, 2012.
Mr. Magorien reviewed the documents outlined above in order to assess the adequacy of the
consultant's evaluation of site - specific geologic hazards and potentially significant geotechnical
constraints. The review was also intended to determine whether these documents were sufficient to
conduct a program -level site - specific EIR analysis and whether additional field research (i.e., site
borings) would be needed for the EIR.
Based on his review of the available data, Mr. Magorien concluded that the data was not sufficient to
support a program -level site - specific EIR analysis and its necessary conclusions. Therefore, an EIR -
level geotechnical investigation was determined to be warranted. Mr. Magorien also concluded that
additional field research (i.e., site borings) were not needed for the EIR. Mr. Magorien's analysis will
include the following:
JN 10- 107917 • 5 • February 13, 2013
1;_
M City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
• A review of relevant geologic /soils data, color aerial photographs, as well as contacting the
City and County Emergency Management Agency to request records of geotechnical reports
associated with construction of the existing building, and the adjacent developments;
• A review of the most recent grading plan;
• Geotechnical engineering analyses of all data collected /generated during the course of this
study; and
• Preparation of a written EIR -level report addressing geology, soils and seismicity.
The finalized report would be utilized by RBF to support the conclusions within the EIR. The impact
section will provide a description of existing conditions, potential project impacts and hazards, and
applicable mitigation measures, if necessary.
D. Greenhouse Gas Analysis /Climate Change
RBF has developed proprietary models for quantifying and analyzing greenhouse gases (GHG) from
a variety of direct and indirect sources including construction, vehicular traffic, electricity
consumption, water conveyance, and sewage treatment. RBF's analyses recommend innovative
greenhouse gas /air pollutant reduction methods during the construction and operation of a project,
conduct advanced air dispersion modeling, evaluate the potential impacts of air pollutants on
surrounding areas, investigate the use of renewable energy sources /energy efficient products, and
quantify the benefits of resource conservation (i.e., electricity usage, recycling, etc.). The following
outlines RBF's Climate Change Analysis for the proposed project:
Emissions Inventory. RBF will review the land use data associated with the Specific Plan and will
prepare an inventory of the greenhouse emissions (i.e., nitrous oxide, methane, and carbon dioxide)
from both direct and indirect sources. The emissions inventory will be compiled consistent with the
methodology prescribed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in the Local Government
Operations Protocol for the Quantification and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories.
The analysis will determine the project's impact by determining if it is consistent with the Assembly
Bill 32 mandate of reducing GHG's by approximately 29 percent beyond "Business as Usual"
conditions. The GHG reduction associated with the Specific Plan's design features will be quantified
utilizing the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) methodology (Quantifying
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures — A Resource for Local Government to Assess Emission
Reductions from Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures [September 2010]).
Energy Conservation. RBF will analyze the energy implications of the project pursuant to Public
Resources Code Section 21100(b)(3) and Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines. These statutes and
guidelines require CEQA compliance documentation to describe, where relevant, the wasteful,
inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy caused by a project. The analysis will analyze
energy consumption associated with short -term construction activities, long -term operations,
buildings, and transportation. Additionally, the assessment of environmental impacts on energy
resources will include mitigation measures to reduce inefficient and unnecessary consumption of
energy.
E. Hazardous Materials
RBF will prepare a Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment (Assessment) for the approximate
143 -acre Raytheon El Segundo Project Site. The objectives of the Assessment are to: (1) evaluate
the potential for hazardous materials on the site based upon readily discernible and /or documented
JN 10- 107917 • 6 • February 13, 2013
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
<< Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
present and historic on -site uses and uses immediately adjacent to the site, and (2) generally
characterize the expected nature of hazardous materials that may be present as a result of such
uses, within the limits imposed by the scope of the Assessment. Materials that may constitute a
hazardous waste include, but are not limited to petroleum products, pesticides, organic compounds,
heavy metals, or other compounds injurious to human health and the environment. This Assessment
is not intended to provide specific qualitative or quantitative information as to the actual presence of
hazardous materials at the site, but will identify the potential presence based on available
information.
The purpose of this Assessment is to support the Environmental Documentation for the proposed
project, in general accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This
Assessment is not considered a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and does not satisfy
the requirements for the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice E
1527 -05 or All Appropriate Inquiry. Should the Client require a Phase I ESA for lending purposes or
require the purchase of new property as part of the proposed project, RBF can provide a follow -up
scope of work, as requested.
To achieve the objectives of this Assessment, RBF will conduct this Assessment, in general
accordance with CEQA, to provide preliminary conclusions relative to site conditions. The scope of
this Assessment includes the CEQA Thresholds specifically pertaining to hazardous materials, which
include the following:
• Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials;
• Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment;
• Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances
or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school; and /or
• Be located on a site included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment.
The Assessment will be designed to document past activities, facilities, and /or waste disposal
practices, which may have resulted in soil or groundwater contamination. Past site usage will be
investigated through an aerial photograph review, interviews, review of former permits, review of
documents on file with applicable agencies, and research of former citations from State and local
agencies. Current site conditions will be documented by an on -site inspection of the project area.
Also, a review of the commercial database summaries, provided by Environmental Data Resources,
Inc. (EDR), regarding public agency records will be included. Regulatory sites within and
surrounding the project area will be mapped within a one -mile radius. Potential hazardous materials
conditions within the project site will be considered based on the EDR database search.
RBF will utilize the above referenced research to analyze potential project - related impacts, as they
pertain to hazardous materials per the CEQA thresholds outlined above. Should a potentially
significant impact arise, RBF will recommend mitigation measures to reduce these impacts to the
extent feasible. RBF will also conclude any significant and unavoidable impacts that may result, if
any.
JN 10- 107917 • 7 • February 13, 2013
1 ,
In accordance with the City's 1983 specification requiring preparation of a Specific Plan, the project
applicant proposes the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. Approval of the Specific Plan
would allow the property to be built up to the permitted 0.6:1 FAR, or an additional 1,843,630 square
feet including office, warehousing, light industrial, and retail. Additionally, the project involves
relocating the existing private recreational facilities, a commercial gym and a jogging track.
The proposed project entitlements include a General Plan (Land Use Element) Amendment, in order
to incorporate the Specific Plan, and a General Plan Land Use Map Amendment, in order to
redesignate the site from Light Industrial to El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. Pursuant to
ESZC Section 15 -26 -1, amendments to the provisions of Title 15 may be undertaken by amending
the Zoning Map or revising the text of the Zoning Title. Accordingly, the project proposes to amend
the Zoning Map (i.e., a Zone Change), in order to rezone the site from M -1, O -S, and P -F to El
Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. Additionally, the project proposes to revise the text of the
Zoning Title (i.e., a Zone Text Amendment), in order to incorporate the Specific Plan text. In
accordance with ELZC Section 15 -3 -2, Specific Plan Zones, the El Segundo South Campus Specific
Plan, if adopted, would function as the zoning code for the property. The project also proposes a
Development Agreement and a Vesting Tentative Tract Map, in order to divide the property into 24
parcels.
The Land Use and Relevant Planning analysis will establish baseline land use data, including
existing land uses both on- and off -site, and will identify the relevant land use regulations. This
section will also analyze the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan for consistency with the El
Segundo General Plan and Zoning Code policies and regulations, given the intended uses and
existing entitlements for the property, as well as any pertinent deed restrictions. This section will
also include an analysis of the project's proposed land uses as outlined in Specific Plan Section IV
(Land Use) and a determination of their compatibility with existing and planned uses/ improvements
in the local area. This analysis will consider the surrounding properties, which are zoned Corporate
Office (C -O), Urban Mixed Use North (MU -N) and P -F Zones to the north, M -1 Zone to the east and
south, and O -S and P -F Zones to the west. The review will recommend, as necessary, modifications
to the proposed policies, guidelines, and standards specified in Specific Plan Section V, in order to
mitigate potential impacts and incompatibilities. In addition, the regional planning review will include
consistency with the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide Policies.
G. Noise
RBF's in -house acoustical team will conduct the noise analysis. Although the site is situated within a
high -level noise environment, the short -term demolition, construction and ultimate buildout may
affect uses in the local area. In consideration of sensitive receptors in the vicinity, the scope of work
is as follows:
Existing Conditions. RBF will review applicable noise and land use compatibility criteria for the project
area. Noise standards regulating noise impacts in the noise standards for the City of El Segundo will be
discussed for land uses on and adjacent to the project site. RBF will conduct a site visit and take short -
term noise level measurements throughout the project area. Noise monitoring equipment will consist of a
Bruel & Kjaer model 2250 sound level meter (SLM) equipped with Bruel & Kjaer pre - polarized freefield
microphone. The results of the noise measurements will be post - processed and graphically illustrated
with the BrOel & Kjoer Noise Explorer software. The noise monitoring survey will include short -term
measurements at up to four separate locations to establish baseline noise levels in the project area.
JN 10- 107917 • 8 • February 13, 2013
p' M
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
Demolition /Construction- Related Noise. Demolition /construction would occur during implementation
of the proposed project. The construction noise impacts will be evaluated in terms of maximum
levels (Lmax) and hourly equivalent continuous noise levels (Leq) and the frequency of occurrence.
Analysis requirements will be based on the sensitivity of the area and the Noise Ordinance
specifications of the City of El Segundo. The traffic noise levels from construction workers accessing
the site will be qualitatively evaluated.
Operational Noise Sources. Potential effects of stationary noise sources will be evaluated based on
local land use compatibility standards. Compliance with applicable noise standards will be
evaluated, with recommended mitigation measures included where appropriate.
The proposed project is anticipated to generate vehicular traffic trips from future growth. On- and
off -site noise impacts from vehicular traffic will be assessed using the U.S. Federal Highway Traffic
Noise Prediction Model (FHWA -RD -77 -108). The analysis will focus on noise impacts associated
with the development of the proposed project. Model input data will include average daily traffic
volumes, day /night percentages of autos, medium and heavy trucks, vehicle speeds, ground
attenuation factors, and roadway widths. The 24 -hour weighted Community Noise Equivalent Levels
(CNEL) will be presented in a tabular format. Traffic parameters necessary for the model input will
be obtained from the traffic impact analysis.
H. Public Services and Utilities
RBF will contact potentially affected agencies to confirm relevant existing conditions, project impacts
and recommended mitigation measures. The discussion will focus on the potential alteration of
existing facilities, extension or expansion of new facilities and the increased demand on services
based on the proposed land uses. RBF will evaluate the ability of the project to receive adequate
service based on applicable City and County standards and, where adequate services are not
available, will identify the effects of inadequate service and recommended mitigation measures.
Issues discussed include:
Public Services:
Solid Waste. Solid waste generation resulting from the proposed uses may impact landfill
capacities. The analysis will establish baseline projections for solid waste, including composting
and recycling for both construction and operation of the project. Project's compliance with AB
939 will also be addressed.
Fire. The overall need for Fire Services would potentially increase beyond existing conditions as
a result of the project. The Fire Services review will include a review of existing
services /facilities in the area, response times to the sites (which includes hazardous material
responses to emergencies), available fire flow, project impacts and required mitigation.
Police. The Police Service review will focus upon response times to the site, available personnel
and overall protection services. The overall need for police protection services would increase
beyond existing conditions as a result of the project. Mitigation incorporated into the project
design, including lighting, signage and security hardware to further reduce potential crime activity
will be identified.
JN 10- 107917 • 9 • February 13, 2013
4 Z,
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
m ' Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
Schools. Potential impacts to schools focusing on existing conditions, student capacities,
current enrollment and facility locations. Generation rates resulting from the project will be the
basis for the impact analysis. Mitigation measures will be provided to reduce the significance of
impacts.
Parks and Recreation. The review will include overall parkland conditions in the City and impacts
which the project may have on the City park system. Potential impacts will be identified with
mitigation to reduce the significance of impacts.
Public Utilities:
Water. Based upon technical information provided by the City, existing capacities and
deficiencies will be addressed. The on -site potable and non - potable water system conditions will
be presented. Off -site potable and non - potable water storage, pumping and transmission
facilities will be studied. Refer to Task 2.6J regarding the proposed Water Supply Assessment.
Sewer. Based upon technical information provided by the City, existing capacities and
deficiencies will be addressed. Major off -site sewer conveyance, treatment and disposal will be
presented. Project generation, infrastructure connections, easement modifications and upgrades
to the existing system will be studied.
Electrical. Existing facilities, project impacts, infrastructure relocation, undergrounding of
overhead lines, easements and necessary mitigation.
Telephone. Existing facilities, project impacts, infrastructure relocated, undergrounding of
overhead lines, easements and necessary.
Gas. Existing facilities, project impacts, infrastructure relocation, easements and necessary
mitigation.
Roadway Maintenance. The proposed project may incrementally increase the maintenance of
streets, storm drains, and other below surface facilities. RBF will consult with the project team
and City Public Works Division to ascertain key concerns /impacts due to increased utilization of
area roads.
I. Traffic and Circulation (PARTIALLY COMPLETED)
RBF will prepare a traffic impact analysis for the proposed Raytheon El Segundo South Campus
project. The traffic study will assess the impacts of the proposed project by analyzing forecast trip
generation, distribution, and assignment of the proposed project on the study area circulation
system. As necessary, mitigation measures for identified project - generated traffic impacts will be
recommended in accordance with applicable agency performance criteria and thresholds of
significance. This scope of work is based discussions with City staff and RBF transportation staffs
familiarity with the City of El Segundo and the project site.
Study Conditions. Based on discussions with City staff, the traffic analysis will identify traffic
operations under the following scenarios:
• Existing Conditions;
• Forecast Near -Term Year Without Project Conditions;
JN 10- 107917 • 10 • February 13, 2013
W� u
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
k'
• Forecast Near -Term Year With Phase 1 Project Conditions;
• Forecast Near -Term Year With Project Buildout Conditions;
• Forecast Long -Range Without Project Conditions; and
• Forecast Long -Range With Project Buildout Conditions.
Study Area. The proposed project could generate approximately 20,000 average dailytrips, which
would include approximately 2,500 peak hour trips during both the a.m. peak hour and the p.m. peak
hour. Therefore, as part of the analysis, RBF will count the following 67 study intersections during
the a.m. peak period (7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.) and the p.m. peak period (4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) on a
typical weekday identified by City staff:
• Pershing Drive /Imperial Highway;
• Vista Del Mar /Grand Avenue;
• Vista Del Mar /Rosecrans Avenue;
• Main Street /Grand Avenue;
• Lomita Street /Grand Avenue;
• Kansas Street /Grand Avenue;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1) /Lincoln Boulevard;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1) /Century Boulevard;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1)/I -105 Westbound Off -Ramp;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1) /Imperial Highway;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1) /Walnut Avenue;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1) /Maple Avenue;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1) /Mariposa Avenue;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1) /Grand Avenue;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1) /EI Segundo Boulevard;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -I) /Hughes Way;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1) /Park Place;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1) /Rosecrans Avenue;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR- 1)/33rd Street;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1) /Marine Avenue;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (SR- 1)/18th Street;
• Sepulveda Boulevard (S R-1 )/Manhattan Beach Boulevard;
• Hughes Way /Imperial Highway;
• Continental Boulevard /Mariposa Boulevard;
• Continental Boulevard /Grand Avenue;
• Continental Boulevard/El Segundo Boulevard;
• Nash Street 1 -105 Westbound Offramp /Imperial Highway;
• Nash Street /Atwood Way;
• Nash Street /Maple Avenue;
• Nash Street /Mariposa Avenue;
• Nash Street /Grand Avenue;
• Nash Street/El Segundo Boulevard;
• 1 -105 Eastbound Onramp /Atwood Way;
• Douglas Street /Imperial Highway;
• Douglas Street/Atwood Way;
• Douglas Street /Maple Avenue;
JN 10- 107917 • 11 • February 13, 2013
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
• Douglas Street /Mariposa Avenue;
• Douglas Street/El Segundo Boulevard;
• Douglas Street /Coral Circle North;
• Douglas Street/Coral Circle South;
• Douglas Street /Transit Center;
• Douglas Street /Rosecrans Avenue;
• Aviation Boulevard /Century Boulevard;
• Aviation Boulevard /104th Street;
• Aviation Boulevard /111th Street;
• Aviation Boulevard /Imperial Highway;
• Aviation Boulevard /116th Street;
• Aviation Boulevard /120th Street;
• Aviation Boulevard /124th Street;
• Aviation Boulevard/El Segundo Boulevard;
• Aviation Boulevard /Utah Avenue;
• Aviation Boulevard /Alaska Avenue;
• Aviation Boulevard /Rosecrans Avenue;
• Aviation Boulevard /33rd Street;
• Aviation Boulevard /Marine Avenue;
• Aviation Boulevard /Space Park Drive;
• Aviation Boulevard /Manhattan Beach Boulevard;
• Isis Avenue /Rosecrans Avenue;
• Hindry Avenue /Rosecrans Avenue;
• 1 -405 Southbound Offramp /Rosecrans Avenue (West);
• 1 -405 Southbound Offramps /Rosecrans Avenue;
• 1 -405 Northbound Ramps /Rosecrans Avenue;
• La Cienega Boulevard /Imperial Highway;
• La Cienega Boulevard /Southbound 1 -405 Ramps;
• La Cienega Boulevard/El Segundo Boulevard;
• 1 -405 Southbound Ramps/El Segundo Boulevard; and
• 1 -405 Northbound Ramps/El Segundo Boulevard.
This scope of work does not assume vehicle classification traffic count data collection, however
vehicle classification counts can be accommodated for a fee in addition to the fee associated with
this scope of work.
Since some study intersections are located outside of the City of El Segundo, the traffic analysis will
utilize applicable agency performance criteria and thresholds of significance as appropriate. Due to
the overlap of jurisdictions, some study intersections may be analyzed and subject to multiple
jurisdiction traffic impact review. Study intersections within the jurisdiction of Caltrans will be
analyzed in accordance with the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (State
of California Department of Transportation, December 2002).
Site Visit/Existing Systems Documentation. RBF will visit the study area to document existing
conditions including intersection control, traffic signal phasing, roadway cross - section, speed limits,
parking restrictions, intersection approach lanes, etc. The traffic analysis will include graphics
documenting the existing intersection roadway geometry, and the analysis will utilize existing
geometric conditions to establish a baseline for current operations.
JN 10- 107917 • 12 • February 13, 2013
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
Cumulative Pro`ects Trip Generation tistribution and Assj nment. RBF will coordinate with City of
El Segundo staff representatives to identify a list of approved /pending projects for inclusion in the
traffic impact analysis. The study will identify the number of daily and peak hour trips forecast to be
generated by approved /pending projects, using trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation
(Institute of Transportation Engineers, 9th Edition, 2012) or other source as directed by agency staff.
RBF will manually derive cumulative projects trip generation and assignment data, which will be
reviewed and approved by applicable agency staff for use in the analysis.
Proposed Project Dt Generation Tri p Distribution, and Assi nment. The study will identify the
number of daily and peak hour trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project, using trip
generation rates contained in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 9th Edition,
2012) or other source as directed by the City, including applicable on -site trip capture assumptions
between compatible land use components of the project, such as the office and retail uses, to reflect
the mixed use nature of the proposed project, as well as appropriate pass -by trip adjustments.
Assumptions regarding project trip generation will be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to
inclusion in the analysis.
The traffic study will provide a forecast distribution of project - generated trips, taking into account the
proposed modified roadway circulation system in order to connect Nash Street to Hughes Way,
which may include redistribution of non - projected generated trips as well as project generated trips.
The Phase 1 Project analysis scenario will not assume the Nash Street - Hughes Way connection.
Forecast project trip distribution and assignment will be based on available and applicable Southern
California Association of Governments (SCAG) traffic model projections which will be reviewed and
approved by applicable agency staff prior to utilization in the analysis.
Roadway Segment Counts. RBF will count up to 65 roadway segments during a 24 -hour period on a
typical weekday within the study area defined by the above identified study intersections.
Forecast Near -Term Year Traffic Volumes. Forecast near -term year traffic volumes will be based on
either specific cumulative projects traffic data supplied by agency staff, and /or by applying an annual
traffic growth rate provided by the agency staff to adjust existing traffic volumes to the designated
future horizon year. Forecast near -term year conditions will assume planned, programmed, and
funded circulation improvements identified by agency staff, anticipated for completion by the project
opening year.
Existing Plus Project. RBF will provide an "Existing Plus Project' conditions analysis scenario in light
of the recent Sunnyvale West Neighborhood Assn. v. City of Sunnyvale City Council, No. H035135
(6th Dist., December 16, 2010) decision; it is important to note the two largest cities in the
metropolitan area, Los Angeles and Long Beach, have recently mandated inclusion of an "Existing
Plus Project' analysis scenario in traffic impact analyses for projects under their jurisdiction.
Forecast Long -Range Year Traffic Volumes. Forecast long -term year traffic volumes will be based
on either specific cumulative projects traffic data supplied by agency staff, and /or by applying an
annual traffic growth rate provided by the agency staff to adjust existing traffic volumes to the
designated future long -range horizon year. Forecast long -range year conditions will assume
planned, programmed, and funded circulation improvements identified by agency staff, anticipated
for completion by the long -range horizon year.
JN 10- 107917 • 13 • February 13, 2013
.
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
Level of Service. The analysis will assess the forecast traffic impacts of the proposed project during
the a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour at the 65 study intersections for the analysis scenarios
identified above. The analysis will document operation of the study intersections using both
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) analysis methodology and the Highway Capacity Manual
(HCM) analysis methodology as directed by the City staff to identify potential project - related traffic
impacts. Intersection level of service analysis will be prepared using the TraffixTM software. If the
analysis indicates the proposed project will significantly impact the study intersections based on
agency thresholds of significance, mitigation measures will be recommended in accordance with
established agency performance criteria. The analysis will document forecast operating conditions
after implementation of recommended mitigation measures.
State HighwayAnalysis. The Caltrans traffic studies guide requires review of substantial individual
projects, which may on their own impact the State Highway transportation system. This State
Highway analysis will be prepared in accordance with the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of
Traffic Impact Studies (State of California Department of Transportation, December 2002), assuming
the State Highway analysis study area will consist of only the State Highway intersections in the
study area. Study intersections will be analyzed as discussed in the Level of Service section above.
This scope of work assumes no freeway mainline or freeway ramp analysis is required.
The analysis will assess the forecast traffic impacts of the proposed project at the State Highway
study facilities for the peak hours and analysis scenarios identified above in the study scenarios
section. The analysis will document operation of the study intersections for the analysis scenarios to
identify potential project - related traffic impacts using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000
analysis methodology.
If the State Highway analysis shows the proposed project will significantly impact a State Highway
facility based on Caltrans thresholds of significance, mitigation measures will be recommended in
accordance with Caltrans performance criteria. The analysis will also document forecast operating
conditions after application of any recommended mitigation measures.
Freeway Ramp Analysis. RBF will analyze and document the number of vehicles utilizing the
thirteen (13) study area freeway ramp locations as well as queuing operation of the study area
freeway ramps (vehicles waiting to transition from ramps to freeway segment /surface street),
including floating vehicles observations for a two -hour period in the a.m. and a two -hour period in the
p.m. for existing conditions and existing plus project conditions scenarios.
Freeway Mainline Analysis. RBF will analyze up to ten (10) freeway mainline segments for mainline
density, as well as merge /diverge for the analysis scenarios.
County Congestion Management Program Analysis. The analysis will analyze potential project
impacts as applicable as required by the County of Los Angeles Congestion Management Program
(CMP). The analysis will study those CMP intersections where the proposed project is forecast to
add 50 or more a.m. or p.m. peak hour trips. It is not possible to identify which CMP study
intersections will trigger the 50 peak hour trip threshold and therefore need to be studied. This scope
of work assumes the following 7 CMP study intersections, which are in addition to the 67 study
intersections identified by City staff (which include CMP intersections in the City of El Segundo as
well as some CMP intersections in the Cities of Los Angeles and Manhattan Beach) will be counted
and analyzed for all analysis scenarios:
JN 10- 107917 • 14 • February 13, 2013
1 3 3 .i.a All
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
• Lincoln Boulevard (SR -1) /Manchester Avenue;
• Lincoln Boulevard (SR -1) /Sepulveda Boulevard;
• Sepulveda Boulevard /Manchester Avenue;
• Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) /Artesia Boulevard (SR -91);
• Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) /Torrance Boulevard;
• Hawthorne Boulevard (SR-1 07)/Pacific Coast Highway; and
• Hawthorne Boulevard (SR- 107) /Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1).
If the CMP analysis shows the proposed project will significantly impact a CMP study facility based
on applicable CMP agency thresholds of significance, mitigation measures will be recommended in
accordance with applicable agency performance criteria.
Parking Analysis. RBF will prepare a parking analysis to determine whether the parking provided by
the proposed project adequately satisfies City of El Segundo municipal (parking) code. This scope of
work does not assume preparation of a share parking analysis.
Metro Green Line Mode Split Analysis. RBF will evaluate a trip mode split for the proposed project
taking into account potential site employee /visitor ridership of the Metro Green Line due to the
proximity of the El Segundo Metro Green Line Station at the northeast area of the project site. The
overall assumptions for this task will be reviewed with City staff for input, and therefore, are subject
to refinement. This scope of work assumes coordination with MTA staff on available future ridership
projections for the Green Line under both its current configuration as well as potential future
southerly extension in the South Bay and northerly extension (LAX/Crenshaw Line) as related to the
project site. Additionally, potential survey results provided by Raytheon of their employees to
determine the number /percent of their current employees utilizing the Metro Green Line El Segundo
Station could be used determine the proportion of future employees forecast to utilize the Metro
Green Line. The results of the mode split analysis would be utilized to reduce the forecast ITE
(vehicular) trip generation of the proposed project to account for utilization of the adjacent Metro
Green Line El Segundo Station.
Nash Street/Hughes Way Connection Analysis. RBF will determine when the Nash Street /Hughes
Way Connection is required in respect to mitigating traffic impacts on the roadway /intersection
system surrounding the project site due to incremental trip generation associated with either
construction of the proposed project or incremental square footage added on the project site as part
of the proposed project. The analysis will use applicable agency performance criteria & thresholds of
significance; along Sepulveda Boulevard (SR -1) applicable agency criteria would include the City of
El Segundo, Caltrans, and Los Angeles County (CMP). This scope of work assumes the Nash
Street /Hughes Way connection will be evaluated in the near - term /project opening year analysis
scenario baseline only.
J. Water Supply Assessment
RBF's Water Resources Department will prepare a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) in accordance
with Water Code 10910 and Senate Bill 610. The WSA will identify the existing and planned water
demands and supply sources for the Project study area. West Basin Municipal Water District
(WBMWD) is the wholesale water supplier for the City and the Project. As the City is a purveyor
customer of WBMWD, RBF assumes the City or the District will provide RBF with basic water supply
information, production data, and all pertinent Urban Water Management Planning information in final
format to satisfy the UWMP review requirements of SB 610. The following tasks have been
identified for the preparation of the WSA:
JN 10- 107917 • 15 • February 13, 2013
4133 mil
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
ll"
,
City/INBMWD Coordination and Documents Review. Coordination with the City will consist of a kick-
off meeting to gather the needed documents for review. RBF will coordinate WSA format and final
report submittal for City approval. RBF assumes Water Division or other City department will provide
the required water supply and billing records information. It is assumed Water Division or WBMWD
staff will provide a recently adopted Water Supply Assessment or other document describing
updated water supply information. This is crucial in order to be consistent with water supply planning
from project to project. RBF budget excludes any and all fees charged by the City of West Basin
Municipal Water District for their review and coordination.
Land Use and Water Demand Estimation. RBF assumes that the following will be provided: (1)
meter records to determine existing water demands of the Project study, or (2) existing land uses
and employee population within the Project study area. This will be used to identify existing water
demands. The provided land use plan will be used for determining Specific Plan water demands,
and for determining changed water demands from current conditions.
The Water Supply Assessment will be incorporated into the EIR in accordance with CEQA.
K. Water and Sewer Infrastructure Peer Review (PARTIALLY COMPLETED)
This task assumes that technical analysis related to water and sewer infrastructure would be
prepared by the applicant's civil engineer, Psomas Associates. RBF's in -house civil engineering
specialists will perform a peer review of Psomas' technical studies for accuracy and defensibility.
This scope includes two rounds of peer review. After the first round of peer review, a second round
will be performed in order to confirm that initial comments were adequately addressed.
RBF will develop Project- specific checklist of water and sewer issues to review, then provide
thorough review of Psomas' draft water and sewer study for the Raytheon Specific Plan. With an
understanding of the City's water supply concerns and water conservation requirements for the next
10 years, RBF will verify Psomas' inclusion of the potential chance, although remote, of a Chevron
pullout and what that could mean to off -site water transmission capacity and sewer conveyance
capacity. RBF will assume a cursory level of review of the City's overall water and sewer master
plans is necessary, and that Psomas will provide adequate consultation with City water and sewer
division operations staff to consider most recent updates of the City's water and sewer systems
performance. RBF will provide a technical memorandum, including Raytheon Project- specific
checklist results and discussion of additional recommendations, if any, for Psomas to include in the
technical analysis.
2.7 GROWTH INDUCEMENT
RBF will provide a project specific analysis update of potential growth- inducing impacts pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(8). The analysis in this section was based on data from the City of
El Segundo, California Department of Finance, and U.S. Census. The section discusses ways in
which the proposed project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of
additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. The analysis
addresses growth- inducing impacts in terms of whether the project influences the rate, location, and
the amount of growth. Growth - inducing impacts are assessed based on the project's consistency
with adopted /proposed plans that have addressed growth management from a local and regional
standpoint. Potential growth- inducing impacts from the proposed development will be analyzed as
they relate to population, housing and employment factors.
JN 10- 107917 • 16 • February 13, 2013
f .0
The range of Alternatives is expected to include the No Project, a reduced design, and one other
Alternative that may be considered through the Project Review process. Pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15126.6, RBF will provide an analysis of a "reasonable range" of alternatives,
comparing environmental impacts of each alternative in each impact area to the project. The
anticipated Alternatives would include the No Project, Alternative Site, Raytheon Only, a Reduced
Project and access at Corral Circle. For each alternative, RBF will provide a qualitative analysis,
which will include traffic, air quality, noise, infrastructure, land use and global climate change. The
Corral Circle Connection Alternative will include a quantitative traffic analysis evaluating traffic
conditions and potential traffic impacts assuming a vehicular connection is made between the project
site and Douglas Street via Coral Circle; the Coral Circle Connection Alternative will be prepared for
only the Forecast Long -Range With Project Buildout Conditions analysis scenario. One important
element of the Alternatives section will be an impact matrix which will offer a comparison of the
varying levels of impact of each alternative being analyzed. This matrixwill be prepared in a format
to allow decision - makers a reference that will be easily understood, while providing a calculated
(where feasible), accurate comparison of each alternative.
The alternatives section will conform to both amendments to Section 15126.6 of the CEQA
Guidelines and to recent and applicable court cases. RBF will discuss as required by the CEQA
Guidelines, the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative and the reasons for rejecting or
recommending the project alternatives stated. This alternatives section will culminate with the
selection of the environmentally superior alternative in accordance with CEQA requirements.
2.9 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
To comply with the Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 (AB 32180), RBF will prepare a
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to be defined through working with City staff to identify
appropriate monitoring steps /procedures and in order to provide a basis for monitoring such
measures during and upon Project implementation.
The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist will serve as the foundation of the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program for the proposed Project. The Checklist indicates the mitigation
measure number as outlined in the EIR, the EIR reference page (where the measure is
documented), a list of Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval (in chronological order under the
appropriate topic), the Monitoring Milestone (at what agency /department responsible for verifying
implementation of the measure), Method of Verification (documentation, field checks, etc.), and a
verification section for the initials of the verifying individual date of verification, and pertinent remarks.
2.10 ADDITIONAL SECTIONS
RBF will provide additional sections in the EIR to meet CEQA and City requirements including the
following: Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes That Would Be Involved In the Proposed
Action Should It Be Implemented, Effects Found Not To Be Significant, Inventory of Unavoidable
Adverse Impacts, and Organizations and Persons Consulted /Bibliography.
JN 10- 107917 • 17 • February 13, 2013
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
3.0 DRAFT EIR
3.1 PRELIMINARY DRAFT EIR
RBF will respond to one complete set of City comments on the Administrative Draft EIR. If desired
bythe City, RBF will provide the Preliminary Draft of the EIR with all changes highlighted to assistthe
final check of the document.
3.2 COMPLETION OF THE DRAFT EIR
RBF will respond to a second review of the Preliminary Draft EIR and will prepare the report for the
required 45 -day public review period. In addition, RBF will prepare the Notice of Completion (NOC)
for submittal to the Office of Planning and Research (OPR). RBF will also work with the City to
develop a distribution listing for the NOC and Draft EIR.
4.0 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
4.1 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
RBF will respond to comments received on the Draft EIR during the 45 -day public review period, and
any additional comments raised during public hearings. RBF will prepare thorough, reasoned and
sensitive responses to relevant environmental issues. This task includes written responses to both
written and oral comments received on the Draft EIR (includes review of hearing transcripts, as
required). The Draft Responses to Comments will be prepared for review by City staff. Following
review of the Draft Responses to Comments, RBF will finalize this section for inclusion in the
Administrative Final EIR.
It is noted that it is unknown at this time the extent of public and agency comments that will result
from the review process. RBF has budgeted conservatively, given the potential scrutiny involved
with the proposed project. Should the level of comments and response exceed our estimate, RBF
will submit additional funding requests to the City in order to complete the responses.
4.2 FINAL EIR
The Final EIR will consist of the revised Draft EIR text, as necessary, and the "Comments to
Responses" section. The Draft EIR will be revised in accordance with the responses to public
comments on the EIR. To facilitate City review, RBF will format the Final EIR with shaded text for
any new or modified text, and "strike out' any text which has been deleted from the Final EIR. RBF
will also prepare and file the Notice of Determination within five (5) days of EIR approval. This scope
of work excludes the required fees for the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG).
4.3 FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
RBF will provide administrative assistance to facilitate the CEQA process including the preparation of
the Notice of Determination, Statement of Overriding Considerations and Findings for City use in the
Project review process. RBF will prepare the Findings in accordance with the provisions of Section
15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines and in a form specified by the City. RBF will submit
the Draft Findings for City review and will respond to one set of City comments.
JN 10- 107917 • 18 • February 13, 2013
J am
5.1 PUBLIC NOTICES
RBF will prepare, submit, and mail all CEQA public notices required for the proposed project. Public
notices are anticipated to include:
• Notice of Preparation: As stated above within Task 1.5, RBF will prepare the NOP for the
proposed project to initiate the 30 -day NOP public review period. RBF will distribute the NOP
to appropriate agencies, parties, and individuals (including the State Clearinghouse). RBF
will also post the NOP at the County Clerk. (completed)
• Notice of Availability: RBF will prepare a Notice of Availability (NOA) to be distributed at the
onset of the 45 -day public review period for the project. The NOA will include required
project information, such as a brief project description, the start /end dates of the public
review period, locations where the EIR is available for review, and contact information for
City staff.
• Notice of Completion: RBF will prepare a Notice of Completion for submittal to the State
Clearinghouse at the onset of both the 30 -day NOP public review period and the 45 -day EIR
public review period. The NOC will follow the format recommended by the State
Clearinghouse.
• Notice of Determination: As stated above within Task 4.2, RBF will prepare a Notice of
Determination, to be filed with the County Clerk and sent to the State Clearinghouse within
five days of EIR certification. This scope of work excludes payment of any CDFG filing fees,
if applicable.
This scope assumes that the Citywould be responsible for any radius mailing or newspaper notices
required for the proposed project.
5.2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COORDINATION
Mr. Glenn Lajoie, AICP, and Ms. Rita Garcia, will be responsible for management and supervision of
the EIR Project Team as well as consultation with the City staff to incorporate City policies into the
EIR. Mr. Lajoie and Ms. Garcia will undertake consultation and coordination of the Project and
review the EIR for compliance with CEQA requirements and guidelines and City CEQA procedures.
RBF will coordinate with state and local agencies regarding this environmental document. Mr. Lajoie
and Ms. Garcia, will coordinate with all technical staff, consultants, support staff and word
processing toward the timely completion of the EIR. It is the goal of RBF to serve as an extension of
City staff throughout the duration of the EIR Project. As is stated in Understanding of the Project,
RBF will be available to meet with staff to discuss particular Project parameters, as required by the
City. In addition, as requested, RBF will provide detailed progress reports on a monthly basis. All
progress reports will include the status of documents currently in production, delivery dates of
documents, upcoming meetings with City Staff, and any outstanding items to be resolved at that
time. Each progress report will include a summary of tasks performed and the percentage of work
completed to date according to individual task.
JN 10- 107917 • 19 • February 13, 2013
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
5.3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MEETINGS
Mr. Lajoie, and /or Ms. Garcia, will attend all staff meetings and will represent the Project Team at
public hearings and make presentations as necessary. RBF anticipates several meetings with City
staff, including a "kick -off meeting" (refer to Task 1.1), progress meetings, public meetings and
hearings. Mr. Lajoie and Ms. Garcia along with other key Project Team personnel will also be
available to attend meetings with affected jurisdictions, agencies and organizations as needed to
identify issues, assess impacts and define mitigation. Should the City determine that additional
meetings beyond the following meetings are necessary, services will be provided under a separate
scope of work on a time and materials basis. The estimated cost for additional meetings is
approximately $800 per person.
• One (1) CEQA Scoping Meeting with City Staff.
• One (1) kickoff meeting with City Staff (refer to Task 1.1).
• One (1) community /neighborhood scoping meeting (refer to Task 1.6).
• Progress meetings with City Staff assumes four (4) meeting to provide written and oral
progress reports, resolve issues, review comments on Administrative documents and receive
any necessary direction from City Staff.
• Three (3) public hearings with presentations as necessary. This includes Planning
Commission and City Council meetings.
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DELIVERABLES
The following is a breakdown of all products /deliverables. The listed deliverables assume a standard
number of deliverables for a project of this type and can be adjusted, as directed by the City. RBF
can also provide a cost, per document, and can provide billing on a time and materials basis, as
requested by the City.
PROJECT SCOPING
• Twenty -five (25) copies of the Notice of Preparation
• Twenty -five (25) copies of the Initial Study
• Sixty (60) CD versions of the NOP /Initial Study
• One (1) Camera -Ready Unbound Copy
• One (1) Electronic Copy of the NOP /Initial Study
PREPARATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EIR
• Five (5) copies of the Administrative Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• Five (5) CD's containing the Administrative Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• One (1) electronic copy in Microsoft Word 2003 Format
• One (1) electronic copy in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) Format
JN 10- 107917 • 20 • February 13, 2013
41 3326 CPA
City of El Segundo
Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan Services
x
M
DRAFT EIR
• Five (5) copies of the Second Administrative Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• Five (5) CD's containing the Second Administrative Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• One (1) electronic copy of the Second Administrative Draft EIR and Exhibits
• Thirty (30) copies of the Draft EIR with Technical Appendices
• Sixty (60) CD's containing the Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• Ninety (90) copies of the Notice of Completion
• One (1) camera -ready unbound original of the Draft EIR, Executive Summary and Technical
Appendices
• One (1) copy of the Draft Executive Summary
• Twenty (20) CDs of the Draft Executive Summary
• One (1) electronic copy in Microsoft Word 2003 Format of the Draft EIR and Technical
Appendices
• One (1) electronic copy in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) Format
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
• Five (5) copies of the Draft Responses to Comments
• One (1) electronic copy of the Response to Comments
• Five (5) copies of the Administrative Final EIR and Technical Appendices
• Five (5) CD's containing the Administrative Final EIR Technical Appendices
• Fifteen (15) copies of the Final EIR and Technical Appendices
• Fifteen (15) CD's containing the Final EIR and Technical Appendices
• One (1) unbound camera -ready original of the Final EIR, Exhibits and Technical Appendices
• One (1) electronic copy of the Final EIR and Technical Appendices in Microsoft Word 2003
Format
• One (1) electronic copy in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) Format of the Final EIR
• Five (5) copies of the Draft Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
• One (1) camera -ready Final Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
• One (1) electronic copy of the Final Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
• One (1) camera -ready Notice of Determination
• One (1) camera -ready Notice of Completion
7.0 DESIGN REVIEW SERVICES (COMPLETED)
RBF has reviewed the draft Specific Plan submittal, site development plan, as well as the City's
Municipal Code. It is noted that the City does not appear to have a formal design review process,
and that the Draft Specific Plan presently does not include robust design guidelines nor does it
include a design review process in its Implementation section. While design guidelines are not a
mandated component of a Specific Plan under California Government Code, for highly visible and /or
prominent projects, the guidelines can provide both the City and developers with guidance during the
development process.
RBF's approach to this task would include the following subtasks:
JN 10- 107917 • 21 • February 13, 2013
19
°y
Meeting with City staff to discuss and understand City design objectives. RBF staff would include a
policy planner and urban designer. Three staff level meetings are budgeted in this subtask. A total
of 30 hours of staff level meetings are assumed.
7.2 SPECIFIC PLAN AND SITE PLAN REVIEW
Detailed review of the draft Specific Plan and site plan. RBF would review the project using a
number of design staff by discipline, including a brief review of the site design by a land development
engineer, review of landscape elements by one of RBF's landscape architects, and review of
architectural issues by an urban designer. A budget of 46 staff hours are assumed for this review.
7.3 DESIGN REVIEW MEMORANDUM
Preparation of a design review memorandum. This memorandum will include the following
elements:
• Comments on the proposed site plan and landscape concept;
• Recommendations for modifications to the draft Specific Plan related to design elements.
This may include specific recommendations for design - related policies and criteria, an outline
of recommended design guidelines section for the Specific Plan document, and
recommendations for a design review process within the Specific Plan to assist staff in the
review of final site plans and architecture.
• Meeting with staff to review RBF's recommendations.
• Attendance at two (2) Public Hearings (Planning Commission and City Council) to present
the design review recommendations and answer questions.
DELIVERABLES
• Meeting notes from meetings with staff and a memorandum (camera -ready and Adobe
Acrobat PDF) of design review comments and recommendations.
Note: RBF's urban design and planning staff can prepare design guidelines for the project under
contract to the City if desired. This would be an optional task, with a scope and fee provided upon
request.
8.0 PROJECT SUPPORT SERVICES (COMPLETED)
Task 8.0 has been modified from the original work program. Previously, Task 8.0 referenced
optional tasks for geology review, hazardous materials and water /sewer peer review. Each of those
task items have been incorporated into the work program contained in Task 2.6. The following are
new task items resulting from the initiation of the work program in the spring of 2012. Budgeting for
each of the following had come from the original Work Program Contingency (20 %).
JN 10- 107917 • 22 • February 13, 2013