Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
2010 AUG 17 - CC PACKETAGENDA
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street
The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed
agenda items. Any writings or documents given to a majority of the City Council regarding any matter on
this agenda that the City received after issuing the agenda packet are available for public inspection in
the City Clerk's office during normal business hours. Such Documents may also be posted on the City's
website at www.elsegundo.org and additional copies will be available at the City Council meeting.
Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City - related business that is
within the jurisdiction of the City Council and /or items listed on the Agenda during the Public
Communications portions of the Meeting. Additionally, the Public can comment on any Public Hearing
item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing portion of such item. The time limit for comments is five (5)
minutes per person.
Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state: Your name and residence
and the organization you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits.
Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk
or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2:00 p.m. the prior
Tuesday). The request must include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or
discussed at the meeting. Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings if
they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not exceed five
(5) minutes in length.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 524 -2305. Notification 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this
meeting.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 2010 — 5:00 P.M.
Next Resolution # 4674
Next Ordinance # 1447
5:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per
person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate
to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so
identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of $250.
�l 1
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
CLOSED SESSION:
The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including
the Brown Act (Government Code Section §54960, et se q.) for the purposes of
conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator, and /or conferring with the City
Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or discussing matters covered under
Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel); and /or conferring with the City's Labor
Negotiators; as follows:
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code
§54956.9(a) -1- matter
1. City of El Segundo vs. City of Los Angeles, et. al. LASC Case No. BS094279
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(b): -0-
potential case (no further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation
pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(c): -0- matter.
APPOINTMENT AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEE
(Gov't. Code § 54957) -0- matter
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54957.6): -1-
matters
1. Represented Group: Police Support Services Employees Association (PSSEA),
City Employees Association (CEA), Firefighters Association (FFA), Police
Managers Association (PMA), Police Officers Association (POA), Supervisory
and Professional Employees (S &P)
Negotiators: Jack Wayt and Bob Hyland
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8): -2-
matters
1. City Property: 2161 El Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo (Fire Station No. 2)
City Negotiators: City Manager, Assistant City Manager
Negotiating Party: Wiseburn School District or Brian Sweeny
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms (potential lease or sale)
2. City Property: APN #4155 - 614 -900 (Storm Water Detention Basin)
City Negotiators: City Manager
Negotiating Party: El Segundo Unified School District
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms (potential lease or sale)
2 UU_'
AGENDA
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street
The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed
agenda items. Any writings or documents given to a majority of the City Council regarding any matter on
this agenda that the City received after issuing the agenda packet, are available for public inspection in
the City Clerk's office during normal business hours. Such Documents may also be posted on the City's
website at www.elsegundo.org and additional copies will be available at the City Council meeting.
Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City - related business that is
within the jurisdiction of the City Council and /or items listed on the Agenda during the Public
Communications portions of the Meeting. Additionally, the Public can comment on any Public Hearing
item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing portion of such item. The time limit for comments is five (5)
minutes per person.
Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state: Your name and residence
and the organization you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits.
Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk
or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2:00 p.m. the prior
Tuesday). The request must include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or
discussed at the meeting. Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings if
they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not exceed five
(5) minutes in length.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 524 -2305. Notification 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this
meeting.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 2010 - 7:00 P.M.
Next Resolution # 4674
Next Ordinance # 1447
7:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION — Father Alexei Smith, St. Andrews Russian Greek Catholic Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Council Member Don Brann
UUJ
3
PRESENTATIONS
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per
person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate
to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so
identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of $250. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to
take action on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after Public
Communications is closed.
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on the
Agenda by title only.
Recommendation — Approval.
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS (PUBLIC HEARING)
1. Consideration and possible action to conduct a public hearing regarding
the proposed revisions made to the Police Services Fee Schedule. (Fiscal
impact: None)
Recommendation — (1) Recommendation to the City Council to conduct a public
hearing and adopt a resolution establishing a revised fee schedule related to
police services; (2) Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this
item.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
2. Continuation of Council's consideration to transition the El Segundo Fire
Department's ( "ESFD ") services to the Consolidated Fire Protection District
of Los Angeles County (aka the Los Angeles County Fire Department),
including possible action to direct staff to proceed with negotiations with
the Los Angeles County Fire Department for annexation of the El Segundo
Fire Department to the Fire District pursuant to the Los Angeles County
Board of Supervisors authorization of the attached Feasibility Study.
Additionally, the Council will consider possible action to direct staff to
undertake further analysis of potential impacts including, without
limitation, an analysis pursuant to Elections Code § 9212 regarding an
initiative petition currently being circulated that would require, if adopted,
that ESFD's services be performed by the County.
Recommendation — (1) Consideration and possible action to direct staff to
proceed with negotiations with the Los Angeles County Fire Department for
annexation of the El Segundo Fire Department to the Fire District pursuant to the
Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors authorization of the attached
Feasibility Study; (2) Consideration and possible action to direct staff to
4
L'Ui
undertake further analysis of the impacts of transitioning ESFD to the County
including, without limitation, an analysis under Elections Code § 9212 regarding
the initiative petition currently being circulated that would require, if adopted, that
ESFD be transitioned to the County; (3) Alternatively, take other related action as
directed by Council.
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a call for
discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of
business.
3. Warrant Numbers 2578445 to 2578647 on Register No. 21 in the total
amount of $1,003,769.44 and Wire Transfers from 7/23110 through 8/05/10
in the total amount of $2,470,874.79.
Recommendation — Approve Warrant Demand Register and authorize staff to
release. Ratify: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks; checks released early
due to contracts or agreement; emergency disbursements and /or adjustments;
and wire transfers.
4. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of August 3, 2010.
Recommendation — Approval.
5. Consideration and possible action to approve a five -year bulk rate
agreement between the City and Time Warner for cable television services
to the residents of Park Vista (Fiscal Impact: None
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Manager to execute a five -year bulk
rate agreement between the City and Time Warner; (2) Alternatively, discuss and
take other action related to this item.
6. Consideration and possible action regarding authorizing the recording of
the Notice of Completion and authorizing the City Manager to accept
completion of work for 26 homes related to the City's Residential Sound
Insulation Program's Group 38 (Project No. RSI 09 -19). (Final Contract
Amount: $746,207.09)
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Clerk to file the City's Planning and
Building Safety Director's Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's Office;
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to close out Project No. RSI 09 -19;
(3) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
5
U0
7. Consideration and possible action to adopt Ordinance No. 1446 approving
Environmental Assessment EA No. 863 and Zone Text Amendment ZTA 10-
03 to amend the C -4 (Commercial Center) Zone to allow: 1) medical and
dental offices, not to exceed 5,000 square feet as permitted uses, and 2)
automobile sales and service centers, not to exceed 70,000 square feet as a
conditionally permitted use; and adopting Development Agreement No. 10-
01 (Fourth Amendment to Development Agreement No.03 -01 with
Rosecrans - Sepulveda Partners, 2, LLC and PES Partners, LLC for the Plaza
El Segundo development project located at 710 -860 South Sepulveda
Boulevard, 700 -740 Allied Way, and 2003 -2015 East Park Place to allow the
following uses: 1) a certified Farmer's Market to operate one day per week
from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.; 2) Medical and Dental Offices, not to exceed a total of
5,000 square feet of floor area; 3) an Automobile Sales and Service Center,
not to exceed 70,000 sq. ft.; and to allow the entire Plaza El Segundo
Development (Phase 1) to be considered as a single parcel for the purpose
of meeting the El Segundo Municipal Code minimum parking requirements
and to eliminate the requirement for individual parcels to have parking
covenants recorded to transfer parking between parcels within the Phase 1
Development Applicant: PES Partners, LLC (Fiscal Impact: None).
Recommendation — (1) Waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1446 for
Environmental Assessment EA 863, Zone Text Amendment ZTA 10 -03, and
Development Agreement Amendment DA 10 -01; (2) Alternatively, discuss and
take other possible action related to this item.
8. Consideration and possible action regarding a request for Community
Challenge Grand funds from the Department of Housing and Urban
Development for the purpose of updating the General Plan and Zoning
Regulations. (Fiscal Impact: Grant award of $640,000 with $160,000
commitment of City matching funds
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the submittal of the grant application and the
commitment of $160,000 in matching funds and in -kind staff time; (2)
Alternatively, discuss and take other possible action related to this item.
9. Consideration and possible action regarding a request for Transportation
Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER II) grant funds for (1)
infrastructure improvements to El Segundo Blvd. between Whiting St. and
Aviation Blvd. and (2) extension of Park Place between Nash Street and
Sepulveda Blvd (Fiscal impact: $550,000 in grant monies as match
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the submittal of a TIGER II grant application for
infrastructure improvements to El Segundo Blvd. between Whiting and Aviation
Blvd.; (2) Authorize the submittal of a TIGER II grant application for the extension
of Park Place between Nash St. and Sepulveda Blvd.; (3) Alternatively, discuss
and take other possible action related to this item.
6 1.0
CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA
F. NEW BUSINESS
10. Consideration and possible action regarding the presentation of fiscal year
2009 -2010 third quarter Financial Review and presentation of the fiscal year
2010-2011 Preliminary Budget (Fiscal Impact: None
Recommendation — (1) Receive and file FY 2009 -2010 Third Quarter Financial
staff report; (2) Receive and file FY 2010 -2011 Preliminary Budget; (3) Publish
announcements of the key budget dates: (a) Public Hearing September 7, 2010,
7:00 p.m. and (b) Continued Public Hearing and Adoption September 21, 2010,
7:00 p.m.; (4) Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item.
11. Consideration and possible action regarding the sale of City property
located at 2161 E. El Segundo Boulevard (former Fire Station Number 2)
and a determination that the sale of the property is categorically exempt
from the California Environmental Quality Act based on Environmental
Assessment No 860 (Fiscal Impact: revenue of not less than $1,575,000
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Manager to enter into a purchase
agreement for the property (2) Alternatively, discuss and take other possible
action related to this item.
G. REPORTS — CITY MANAGER
H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY
I. REPORTS — CITY CLERK
J. REPORTS — CITY TREASURER
K. REPORTS — CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member Fuentes —
UU1
Council Member Brann -
Council Member Jacobson -
Mayor Pro Tern Fisher -
Mayor Busch -
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per
person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have receive value of $50 or more to communicate
to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so
identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of $250. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to
take action on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after Public
Communications is closed.
MEMORIALS -
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act
(Government Code Section §54960, et se q.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property
Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or
discussing matters covered under Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel); and /or conferring with
the City's Labor Negotiators.
REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required)
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED:
DATE: ( / f iL0/ d
TIME:
NAME:
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE: August 17, 2010
AGENDA HEADING: Special Orders of Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action to conduct a public hearing regarding the proposed
revisions made to the Police Services Fee Schedule. (Fiscal Impact: None)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Recommendation to the City Council to conduct a public hearing and adopt a
resolution establishing a revised fee schedule related to police services.
2. Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Proposed Police Services Fee Schedule as Exhibit "A" to the proposed Fee Comparison
Report and Exhibit "B" Police Department Cost of Services Study report.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Amount Budgeted: $
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s):
ORIGINATED BY: Brian Evanski, Lieutenant
REVIEWED BY: Mitch Tavera, Chief of Poli
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manager
I
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
The Police Department charges fees for certain services provided to the public. Police staff is
recommending changes to the Police Services Fee Schedule adopted on the 16`h of December,
2003 under Resolution No. 4352. These recommendations have been developed pursuant to
applicable Government Code Sections 66016- 66018.5, and the City's fee recovery policy. This
proposal is recommending an increase of the existing police services fees. Other fees, except as
noted will remain the same. If adopted, it is estimated that the restated fee schedule would
generate an additional $69,800.00 in cost recovery annually. The basis of the study was to
establish fees at a level not more than that necessary to recover reasonable costs incurred for the
services. These fees are based on the salary and benefits costs for each job classification
involved, plus maintenance and operating supplies cost.
The proposal also includes a reduction in fees specific to bicycle registration, police alarm permit
and massage therapist permit.
Police staff believes these fees will encourage Municipal Code compliance and to help recover
the actual costs of the application process. These fees are described on the exhibit "A" and "B"
attachments to the resolution.
009
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A NEW FEE SCHEDULE FOR
THE EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT TO RECOVER
COSTS INCURRED FROM PROVIDING VARIOUS PUBLIC
SERVICES.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of El Segundo as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds as follows:
A. The City Council may establish fees for services under various provisions
of California Law including, without limitation, Business & Professions
Code § 16000; Government Code §§ 36936.1, 43000, 54344, 65104,
65456, 65874, 65909.5, 65943, 66013, 66014, 66451.2; and Health &
Safety Code §§ 510, 17951, 17980.1, 19852.
B. Pursuant to Government Code § 66016, the City made data available
regarding the cost, or estimated cost, of providing services for various fees
ten (10) days before the public hearing held on August 17, 2010.
C. On August 17, 2010, the city Council heard public testimony and
considered evidence in a public hearing held and noticed in accordance
with Government Code § 66016.
D. At the recommendation of the City's Departments and the City Manager,
the City Council believes that it is in the public interest to establish the
recommended fees to recover the costs of public services.
SECTION 2: The fees attached as Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" incorporated into this
Resolution as if fully set forth, are approved and adopted.
SECTION 3: Unless otherwise revised, the fees established by this Resolution will be
automatically adjusted on an annual basis at the beginning of each fiscal year based on
the average percentage change over the previous calendar year to the City's costs for
administering the services set forth in Exhibit "A" and "B." The first fee adjustment
cannot be made before a minimum of ten (10) months after the effective date of this
Resolution.
SECTION 4: This Resolution is exempt from review under the California Environmental
Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21000, et seq.; "CEQA ") and CEQA regulations
(Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 14, §§ 15000, et seq.) because it establishes, modifies, structures,
restructures, and approves rates and charges for meeting operating expenses;
purchasing supplies, equipment, and materials; meeting financial requirements; and
obtaining funds for capital projects needed to maintain service within existing service
0 0,
Page 1 of 3
areas. This Resolution, therefore, is categorically exempt from further CEQA review
under Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 14, § 15273.
SECTION 5: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption and will
remain effective unless repealed or superseded.
SECTION 6: The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution;
will enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City; and will make a
minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the record of proceedings of the City
Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and
adopted.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17TH day of August, 2010
tric Busch, Mayor
Page 2 of 3 L) l i
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of the City is five; that the foregoing
Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council,
approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said
City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 17th day of August, 2010, and
the same was so passed and adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Cindy Mortesen
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
By:
Karl H. Berger
Assistant City Attorney
Page 3 of 3
NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
For the purpose of considering proposed revisions made
to the Police Services Fee Schedule
Date: August 17, 2010
Time: 7:00 P.M.
Place: City Council Chambers
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA
TAKE NOTICE that the El Segundo City Council will hold a public hearing on Tuesday,
August 17, 2010, commencing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, in the El
Segundo Council Chambers, 350 Main Street. The public hearing will allow testimony
regarding the following:
Proposed revisions made to the Police Services Fee Schedule.
The purpose of this hearing is to hear testimony of all interested parties for the purpose of
considering revisions made to the Police Services Fee Schedule.
At any time, not later than the aforesaid hour set for the hearing, any person or
organization may file a written statement with the City Clerk of the City, of his or her
opinions with respect to the schedule of fees and charges for Police services. Any person
or organization desiring to be heard will be given an opportunity to do so. If you have
questions regarding this hearing, the Schedule of fees and Charges for Police Services, or
any other matter, you may call the City offices at (310) 524 -2300. Note that any appeal
of a decision made following a public hearing may be limited to the issues raised by
evidence submitted before or during that public hearing.
A copy of the City of El Segundo Police Services Fee Schedule will be available for
public review in the Office of the City Clerk of El Segundo located in City Hall at 350
Main Street, El Segundo, California, ten days prior to the hearing.
t ;�1
EXHIBIT "A"
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2009 -2010
REF #: PO -001 TITLE: FIREARMS DEALER PERMIT
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$256 per application $645 per application
REF #: PO -002 TITLE: FORTUNETELLER PERMIT
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$256 per application $465 per application
REF #: PO -003
TITLE: SECONDHAND DEALER PERMIT
CURRENT FEE
RECOMMENDED FEE
None
$115 per application
REF #: PO -003A
TITLE: PAWNSHOP PERMIT
CURRENT FEE
RECOMMENDED FEE
$256 per application
$645 per application
REF #: PO -004 TITLE: BINGO PERMIT
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$256 per application $350 per application
REF #: PO -006 TITLE: POLICE MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT PRMT
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$500 per application plus $120 annual inspection $465 per application
1
July 21, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2009 -2010
REF #: PO -007 TITLE: MASSAGE THERAPIST PERMIT
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$150 per application ($50 County testing fee paid to the County) $90 per application plus County testing fee
REF #: PO -008 TITLE: AUCTION HOUSE PERMIT
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$256 per application $465 per application
REF #: PO -009
TITLE: POOL ROOM PERMIT
CURRENT FEE
RECOMMENDED FEE
$256 per application
$465 per application
REF #: PO -011
TITLE: TAXI VEHICLE PERMIT
CURRENT FEE
RECOMMENDED FEE
$35 per vehicle per year
$85 per vehicle per year
REF #: PO -012 TITLE: TAXI DRIVER PERMIT
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$75 per application $130 per application
REF #: PO -013 TITLE: MISC. POLICE BUSINESS PERMIT
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
None $465 per application
2
July 21, 2010
0
Ulo
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2009 -2010
REF #: PO -014 TITLE: CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
New - $86 per application Fee is set by State Penal Code Section 12054:
Renewal - $28 per renewal
New - $100 per application ($20 collected on filing the
application and the remaining $80 collected on issuance of the
license.)
Renewal - $25 per renewal
Amended - $10 per application
Psychological testing costs are to be added to the above fees up
to $150
REF #: PO -015 TITLE: CLEARANCE FORM /LETTER
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10 per application $25 per application
REF #: PO -016 TITLE: RECORDS CHECK - LOCAL
CURRENT FEE
$10 per name
RECOMMENDED FEE
$20 per name
REF #: PO -017 TITLE: CITATION SIGN -OFF SERVICE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$8 per citation $10 per citation
REF #: PO -018 TITLE: VEHICLE IMPOUND RELEASE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Standard Release - $35 per vehicle Standard Impound - $55 per vehicle
DUI Vehicle Release - $115 per vehicle 30 Day /DUI Impound - $115 per vehicle
3
July 21, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2009 -2010
REF #: PO -019 TITLE: POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE /BILLING
CURRENT FEE
$100 for each alarm over 3 in a calendar year
RECOMMENDED FEE
First 3 alarms in a calendar year - No Charge
4th false alarm - $200
5th false alarm - $300
6th and subsequent false alarm - $400
REF #: PO -020 TITLE: POLICE ALARM PERMIT
CURRENT FEE
RECOMMENDED FEE
$25 per permit
Violation for non -alarm permit - additional $80
Alarm Permit - No Charge
Violation for non -alarm permit - additional $160
REF #: PO -022
TITLE:
DUI COLLISION RESPONSE
CURRENT FEE
RECOMMENDED FEE
$95 per hour
Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all responding
emergency personnel, not to exceed $12,000 per incident by
State law.
REF #: PO -023
TITLE:
SECOND RESPONSE CALL -BACK
CURRENT FEE
RECOMMENDED FEE
$95 per hour
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all responding
personnel.
REF #: PO -024
TITLE:
BOOKING SERVICE
CURRENT FEE
RECOMMENDED FEE
None
$215 per booking to be collected upon conviction
REF #: PO -024A
TITLE:
DUI ARREST
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
None $640 per arrest to be collected upon conviction
4
July 21, 2010
O1E
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2009 -2010
REF #: PO -025 TITLE: SPECIAL EVENT POLICE SERVICE
CURRENT FEE
$95 per hour
RECOMMENDED FEE
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all required personnel.
REF #: PO -026 TITLE: FINGERPRINTING ON REQUEST
CURRENT FEE
$10 per application plus any DOJ fees
RECOMMENDED FEE
$30 per application plus any DOJ fees
REF #: PO -027 TITLE:
POLICE REPORT /DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION
CURRENT FEE
RECOMMENDED FEE
Arrest Report - $67
Traffic Collision Report - No Charge
As this service is covered by the Public Records Act, the City
Daily Report - No Charge
copy fee is:
Other Report - No Charge
$0.20 per page
REF #: PO -028 TITLE:
POLICE PHOTO REPRODUCTION
CURRENT FEE
RECOMMENDED FEE
$5 per copy
$30 per request
REF #: PO -029 TITLE:
POLICE DISPATCH TAPE COPY
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
None $100 per request
REF #: PO -030 TITLE: POLICE AUDIO/VIDEO TAPE COPY
CURRENT FEE
$5 per copy
RECOMMENDED FEE
$155 per tape /DVD
5
July 21, 2010
0 19
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2009 -2010
REF #: PO -032 TITLE: BICYCLE LICENSE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
New - $4 per license It is suggested that the City discontinue this fee.
Renewal - $2 per license
The fees are set by the State.
REF #: PO -040 TITLE: ANIMAL AT -LARGE PICKUP
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
1st offense - $7.50 1st offense - $10
2nd offense - $15 2nd offense - $25
3rd offense - $25 3rd and subsequent offense - $40
REF #: PO -041 TITLE: VICIOUS ANIMAL HEARING
CURRENT FEE
None
RECOMMENDED FEE
No Fee is recommended
REF #: PO-046 TITLE: ANIMAL TRAP RENTAL
CURRENT FEE
$75 deposit per trap
RECOMMENDED FEE
No Change
There is no charge for the use of the trap.
REF #: PO -047 TITLE: ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
CURRENT FEE
Dog License:
Regular - $40
Spayed or Neutered - $20
Seniors - $10
Late Fee - $10
REF #: PO -999 TITLE:
CURRENT FEE
RECOMMENDED FEE
No Change
RECOMMENDED FEE
59
July 21, 2010
EXHIBIT "B"
POLICE DEPARTMENT COST OF SERVICES STUDY
Police Department
Cost of Services Study
for the
City of El Segundo
JUNE 2010
Prepared by:
Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC
1519 East Chapman Ave, Suite C
Fullerton, CA 92831
www.revenuecost.com
(714) 992 -9020
Copyright, 2010 by Revenue & Cost Specialists
June 22, 2010
Mr. Mitch Tavera, Chief of Police
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Dear Mr. Tavera,
This Report fulfills our contract with the City to calculate the Police Department fees for the fiscal
year 2009 -2010. It is our hope that this Report will assist City Staff in updating the current fee
structure.
The Report consists of Service Center Worksheets for each service and their accompanying Cost
Detail Sheets. Each Service Center Worksheet has a suggested fee structure to achieve the
authorized recovery percentage set by City Ordinance. The City is currently recovering more than
$120,000 in fee - related revenue against more than $1 million in fee - related costs, therefore the City
is subsidizing fee - related costs by almost $900,000.
We wish to thank all City Staff who extended their time for this Report. This Report is a
culmination of our joint effort, and City Staff input was invaluable. We look forward to working
with the City in the future.
Respectfully Submitted,
Eric S. Johnson
Principal
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
By acceptance of Revenue & Cost Specialists' (RCS) proposal, the City of El Segundo decided to
subject its Police Department fee -based services to detailed analysis dedicated toward seeking
alternate, and more equitable, ways to finance City services provided to the community. Due to
the various demands made of the City, it is essential that the City Council and management have
complete information upon which to assess fees charged to the public for services provided. The
table at the end of this Executive Summary lists each service reviewed in this study. It indicates
that the City could realize approximately $69,800 in additional new revenue if the
recommendations provide herein are adopted and implemented.
Organization of Report. This Executive Summary explains RCS's philosophy concerning fee -
based services and cost analysis with a discussion of Costs Generally Defined. The report then
lists the Types of Costs included in our analysis, our General Recommendations, and closes with a
Conclusion.
COSTS GENERALLY DEFINED
The basic costs of operating any business are direct labor and employee benefits, direct materials,
allied indirect costs, overhead costs, and fixed asset or "depreciation" charges.
Determination of "Costs ". After the passage of Proposition 13, the California Taxpayers
Association, the California Chamber of Commerce, the National Tax Limitation Committee and
the California Association of Realtors put Proposition 4 before the voters. It was adopted by
74.3 % of the voters of California on November 6, 1979, and became effective on July 1, 1980,
retroactive to Fiscal Year 1978 -79.
This proposition, which became Article XIIIB of the State Constitution, addressed all city revenues
and established a limit on the growth of tax revenues. Also, because of Proposition 4, fee services
cannot exceed the "costs reasonably borne" by the City in providing the service. If the fee exceeds
the cost, the excess fee is defined to be a special tax, which Proposition 13 requires be approved
by two - thirds of the voters.
As Article XIIIB was written by the above business groups, it is not surprising that they
recommended a business - oriented approach to the costs of governmental services. For example:
"The phrase 'costs reasonably borne by such entity in providing the regulation,
product, or service' is intended to incorporate all appropriations by an entity for
reasonable costs appropriate for the continuation of the service over time. This
1
tt • -�
v�J
City of El Segundo Police Department Fee Study
includes ongoing expenses such as operation costs and a reasonable allocation for
overhead and administration, but it also includes reasonable allocation for start -up
costs and future capacity. Thus, reasonable allocations for capital replacement,
expansion of services, and repayment of related bond issuances would be
considered `costs reasonably borne'. "'
Principle Involved. A basic principle involved in this Report is the recognition of those full
business costs as they are as defined by the authors of the Constitutional amendment, NOT just
those costs which 1) the City might recognize and decide to budget; or 2) which it might decide to
use in some other cost analysis methodology; or 3) that other jurisdictions not so complying might
use; or 4) that some accounting or other consulting firm might decide it should use, based on some
external, non - California legal requirements.
These cost elements have been determined in a businesslike manner per basic business principles,
and applied to each and every fee - financed or fee- financeable service provided by the City,
modified only slightly to accommodate the published intent and definitions of the authors of Article
XIIIB. Thus a logical, legal, and Constitutionally - mandated cost - consciousness can now be
applied to City operations.
TYPES OF COSTS
Salaries and Wages. City government is in fact a service industry, therefore it is natural that
salaries make up the largest single element of cost in most services.
Employee Fringe Benefits. Since the annual time of an employee has been fully allocated to
service centers, fringe benefit costs also must be included. These costs are current operating
expenses and are included in the City's Annual Budget. Fringe benefit costs were taken into
consideration by salaried personnel employed by the City.
Maintenance and Operation Costs. All maintenance and operation costs, including non - personnel
expenses such as professional services, insurance, operating supplies, etc., were derived from the
' "Summary of Proposed Implementing Legislation and Drafter's Intent with Regard to Article XIIIB of the California
Constitution (Proposition 4, November 6, 1979) "; Spirit of 13, Inc.; 1980; California Chamber of Commerce; page 6.
V��
City of El Segundo Police Department Fee Study
2009 -2010 Council- approved budget and allocated via percentages or through actual allocation to
each of the service centers identified in a department or division.
Overhead Costs. Although overhead is a well established and necessary expense item in business,
it is only recently that governments started adopting business techniques. As many believe that
government is no different than a good corporation -- the axiom "Buy good management" should
prevail in government "corporations." RCS utilizes three types of overhead, which are discussed
below in turn.
General City Overhead - would be for the general administration of the City, such as the
functions for City Council, City Manager, City Clerk, City Attorney, Human Resources,
and Finance. Each service is very important to the smooth functioning of the City. But,
their primary function is to support other departments and not to provide an end -user
service to the public.
Departmental and /or Divisional Overhead - is usually allocated to the department head, the
departmental secretary or the division managers. Again, the purpose of these services is to
insure the smooth functioning of the department and not to provide an end -user service to
the public.
Unallocated Operating Costs - are the costs for any service that could have been accounted
for in an Internal Service Fund (ISF) such as information systems, building maintenance
costs, and vehicle maintenance costs. Each of these services could be purchased from the
private sector.
RCS calculated general overhead and unallocated operating costs overhead through our Cost
Allocation Process. Our analysis identified departments receiving each type of overhead service,
selected a method for allocating the costs to those departments, and then reviewed the allocations
for reasonableness. Costs associated to the each department were included as well as a uniquely
determined departmental overhead rate.
3
V'�J
City of El Segundo Police Department Fee Study
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
Adoption of Modifications to Current Fee Structure
It is recommended that the City Council adjust the fee schedule for the enumerated City services
presented in Appendix A of this Report. Continued use of the "full business costing" concept will
create consistency in the establishment of fees, and allow for timely adjustment to reflect changes
in the cost of providing services.
Review of Suggested Recovery Rates
The City Council should review each service and the suggested recovery rate to determine how
much of each service should be recovered through fees, and how much should be subsidized
through the City's tax dollars. This review is very important because it gives City staff direction
as to what the Council wants to subsidize and what it does not.
All Things To All People
While the City is deciding who to subsidize and what to finance, it should remember it cannot
provide all things to all people. It should therefore prioritize what it hopes to accomplish. If the
Council decides to provide more subsidies today, it is doing so at the expense of other services
which can only be financed by tax dollars, such as Police Patrol and Investigations services.
Therefore the Council must decide which direction it wants to proceed in, fully aware of the
consequences of either action.
CONCLUSION
If all the recommendations and suggestions made in this Report are adopted, the City's financial
picture would be improved. Also, far more equity between taxpayers and fee - payers, as well as
fairness between property - related and non property- related services could be secured, assisting in
the City's continued financial stability into the future. The following Schedule 1 portrays the
various services assessed during our analysis.
Appendix A - Detailed Worksheets
The substance of RCS's work effort on this project is primarily comprised of two different
worksheets shown in the detail of this report (see Appendix A). The first, "Revenue and Cost
Summary Worksheet" is on the left hand side. These worksheets include a description of the
service, the current fee structure, the recommended recovery rate, and other pertinent information.
4
UZG
City of El Segundo Police Department Fee Study
Also included is the revenue and cost comparison and suggestions for fee modifications.
Presented on the facing page, titled "Cost Detail Worksheet ", is the worksheet which details the
costs involved with each service. This page identifies those employees providing the service, the
time spent, and their related costs.
w
J
0
w
2
U
U)
0
Z
W
J
W
U-
0
_H
U
U)
0
m
D
U)
0
Z
Q
U)
U)
O
U
W
D
Z
W
W
w
LL
O
}
Q
U)
r
N
1
0)
NN
LPL
W
J
Q
U
U)
LL
w w O o o o o O o 0 o 0 0 0 O o o o o O o o O O O o o 0 o O O O o O
J D 69 69 Eli 69 69 69 O Efi O O O fA EH O O O O Eli O EA E9 Eii 69 69 O 6H O O O 6?-'k O EA
m Z N No) M M O B 00 Co It 0o LO Co
OZ W ��6% �0�69 6v NF? �69�
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W W o o o O O o o o O O O o o O O o o o 0 0 o o o O o o o O o O o 0
W W 0 c a o 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 o LOLLi 0 0 0 0 0 c c o 6 0 0 o c c o
> 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O o O O O O W M O o o 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 00
U
W
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Z Z (0 00 O W h- r- O 00 O I,- O N O LC) O M It ti O O O O .- M O V O N O V O
w w O 4 O 6 Nr,� Co 4 4 6 O O O O- O O M O O O O N CM O Ln 6 CM O O O
U M U.) M ti O w 0 Ln V Ln qt Ln Ln N v (o M - �
W
0-0
Ln - WC'MO .- MvIl- -O V vMMMMLlnMMM - O QQOMCV)
O- : O O M V Ln ti W Ln O Ln M M O N 0 I` m M Ln V w Ln Z Z 69 v w
5: M N o N O ti ti M O Ln Ln Ln - EA V n rl- M�
t 0
IS Ev 1 Ev 69 61k Nv q7 Ln �t Cr; N Ln 06 N O O Ln qq O � N N N
�} Ev .- � CA Ln Eli Cl) N Ln N by EA 69 69
0 �' Ui fA 69 - - 6R .- 60- by
m ' 6,3, 6v
a
W In N r- O r I` O T r- ti O �? � m v O Ln M M M- O p- N w O w M
ct (o Ln w w w w Ln r- w M O O Ln 00 O O O r- M m Ln M W Ln O O ER O w
to d CO M Z& M 61 Z& M f" � M � N Co 'T I- (D Li) Ln Ln - - (o LL) N O Co O V
F
CI) W4 EA (fl (A EH EA 00 N_ � � � O LA LC) . M 00 O Liz � � O 1 M M � N N
O Eli 69 T EA � � Eg M N r- U) Cl) 6R 6f} CA 6R H4 69
U E9 613 6H 69 69 E9
w w O w w O O w w O O O Co O O O Lo O Ln 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
w Ln Ln 69 Ln Ln O O Ln Lo O O W3 0o O "t N v O r- 69 Ni 60? Eli O O 6F3. O 69 Lo 69 Co Eli
N N�NM � vi o Ln r Ln
6- Z 69 69E9�69 r,: V3, N O to
613, 69
W 69 61i N 64 M - ER
> 69 613,61) ER
W
z
O
z
a 0
z m iy-
Y w a }
J H z g Z U >�a0 }O
a wW0 Q �wf -F- IL
a mwF- aawJ >aW IL �m U)dWmma acs
() W Qa� U) F- ww�owQ Yz
>aWJF- C) U) F- F-Z0J- waW2aW �zUmQO UQ
w w a W 2 W a a w w w o Q Y lai g w W Z U a° O w 2 0 W w 2
�QJCWF- Qw�aaam�OWZOwgzm Z?WOF-ZzXQ
W J a- Ui 0 w w = P Q O W �
U)Fw- QawQ ~z0UwUwvUm Ja-wU)v~i >zmowoUgz
(Aw20W W O — >JJ U) QLn � waw2— DJF--Q
c Z In a w Q O a w af a W Q a O J w W J Z? Q a W W W W J J w
waO��J(n( -)0 V ZwOQ= JJ000 w�JJJJ }��
ILL aCwnama�Qa F- �°UUwU >mmOcwnm0vail- mmmmmQ>
� j*k N M M V W I` M O- N M v Li') W� O O O N M V V Lo W� w m O N O .-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •--' c- - - � � a- N N N N N N N N N N M M v v
W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
00000000000000000000000000000000
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
N
O
a�
O
L6
a
L }146
w
J
Q
W
2
U
U)
uj
E5
in
D
U)
0
O Q o
Z H N
D
w 0 N
LU LLI W
LL D
LU Q
� U
W
U LL
Ix
LL
O
C�
L
W
J
Efi O
>
m > Z
act
(n w W
z
m
w
O W
� U)
o ui
O (g
U Z)
W
Z Z
O (0 O
w
o v C4
U
W
a U
rn rn 0
co — ao
Qom
a) Co
.. •- N
0 m
M M ce) Go
6H h
aD
rn r- w
a) a) M
U) N
O M O
U 6q
M
W
D
z
w
w
w
w
J
F-
P:
w
U_
>
w
U)
LL
w
it
O CD O
EA t0 w
CD N
643� Ir.
J
a
0
0
z
U)
W
U_
>
J
Q W
F- U
Z J
W w
aF-
z
wO
F- U
Q Q
ZZ
as
0
O
IL
T
c
w c cr
c
a)
a)
Y 7
J M U
020
OD
U)
O
F-
w
Y
N
0
N
N
rn
co
a
APPENDIX A
REVENUE AND COST
SUMMARY WORKSHEETS
Matched With
COST DETAIL WORKSHEETS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
FIREARMS DEALER PERMIT
PO -001
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request to operate a firearms dealer business within the City.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$256 per application
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$266.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$256
UNIT COST:
$647.00
TOTAL COST:
$647
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(391.00)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(391)
TOTAL UNITS:
1
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
39.67%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$645 per application
June 22, 2010
�'J1
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
FIREARMS DEALER PERMIT
PO -001
NOTE
TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
1
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE
UNIT TIME
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE CAPTAIN
0.25
$82.21 1
$82
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE RECORDS SUPV
0.17
$24.48 1
$24
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT
3.00
$540.09 1
$540
TYPE SUBTOTAL
3.42
$646.78
$647
TOTALS 3.42 $647.00 $6471
1 ".. 99 9010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
FORTUNETELLER PERMIT
PO -002
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request to operate a
fortuneteller business within the City.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$256 per application
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$256.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$256
UNIT COST:
$467.00
TOTAL COST:
$467
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(211.00)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(211)
TOTAL UNITS:
1
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
54.82%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY
OF: 100%
$465 per application
June 22, 2010 (j j
v v .J
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
FORTUNETELLER PERMIT
PO -002
NOTE
TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
1
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE
UNIT TIME
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE CAPTAIN
0.25
$82.21 1
$82
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE RECORDS SUPV
0.17
$24.48 1
$24
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT
2.00
$360.06 1
$360
TYPE SUBTOTAL
2.42
$466.76
$467
TOTALS 2.42 $467.00 $467 1
cis
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
SECONDHAND DEALER PERMIT
PO -003
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request to operate a secondhand dealer business within the City.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$0.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$0
UNIT COST:
$115.00
TOTAL COST:
$115
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(115.00)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(115)
TOTAL UNITS:
1
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$115 per application
June 22, 2010
035-
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
SECONDHAND DEALER PERMIT PO -003
NOTE TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE RECORDS SUPV 0.17 $24.48 1 $24
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT 0.50 $90.02 1 $90
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.67 $114.50 $115
TOTALS 0.67 $115.00 $1151
June 22, 2010
U3C
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
PAWNSHOP PERMIT
PO -003A
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request to operate a
pawnshop business within the City.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$256 per application
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$256.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$256
UNIT COST:
$647.00
TOTAL COST:
$647
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(391.00)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(391)
TOTAL UNITS:
1
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
39.57%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$645 per application
June 22, 2010 }
U 3 1
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
PAWNSHOP PERMIT
REFERENCE NO.
PO -003A
NOTE
TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
1
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE
UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE CAPTAIN
0.25
$82.21 1
$82
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE RECORDS SUPV
0.17
$24.48 1
$24
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT
3.00
$540.09 1
$540
TYPE SUBTOTAL
3.42 $646.78
$647
TOTALS 3.42 $647.00 $647 i
U38
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
BINGO PERMIT
PO -004
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Business /Comm. Group
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request to operate a bingo
game within the City.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$256 per application
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$256.00
TOTAL REVENUE: $256
UNIT COST:
$352.00
TOTAL COST: $352
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(96.00)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(96)
TOTAL UNITS:
1
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 72.73%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
100%
$350 per application
June 22, 2010
�' J
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
BINGO PERMIT PO -004
NOTE TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE CAPTAIN 0.25 $82.21 1 $82
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT 1.50 $270.05 1 $270
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.75 $352.26 $352
TOTALS 1.75 $352.00 $352
h mP 99 9()1 n
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
POLICE MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT PRMT
PO -006
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request of the Police Department to operate a massage establishment within the City and perform
the necessary background checks.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$500 per application plus $120 annual inspection
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $500.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$600
UNIT COST: $467.00
TOTAL COST:
$467
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $33.00
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$33
TOTAL UNITS: 1
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
107.07%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$465 per application
June 22, 2010
,'41
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
POLICE MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT PRMT
REFERENCE NO.
PO -006
NOTE
TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
1
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE
UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE CAPTAIN
0.25
$82.21 1
$82
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE RECORDS SUPV
0.17
$24.48 1
$24
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT
2.00 $360.06 1
$360
TYPE SUBTOTAL
2.42 $466.75
$467
TOTALS 2.42 $467.00 $467
June 22, 2010
} 121-1
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
MASSAGE THERAPIST PERMIT
PO -007
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request to operate as massage therapist within the City.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$150 per application ($50 County testing fee paid to the County)
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $160.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$600
UNIT COST: $90.00
TOTAL COST:
$360
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $60.00
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$240
TOTAL UNITS: 4
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
166.67%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$90 per application plus County testing fee
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
MASSAGE THERAPIST PERMIT PO -007
NOTE TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 4
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT + County Pass Thru 0.50 $90.02 4 $360
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50 $90.02 $360
TOTALS
0.50 $90.00
June 22, 2010
$360 1
14 At
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
AUCTION HOUSE PERMIT
PO -008
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request to operate an aution house business within the City.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$256 per application
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$256.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$256
UNIT COST:
$467.00
TOTAL COST:
$467
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(211.00)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(211)
TOTAL UNITS:
1
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
54.82%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$465 per application
.rune zz, zuiu
iU
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
AUCTION HOUSE PERMIT
PO -008
NOTE
TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
1
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE
UNIT TIME
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE CAPTAIN
0.25
$82.21 1
$82
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE RECORDS SUPV
0.17
$24.48 1
$24
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT
2.00
$360.06 1
$360
TYPE SUBTOTAL
2.42
$466.75
$467
TOTALS 2.42 $467.00 $467
�unc cc, w —
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
POOL ROOM PERMIT
PO -009
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request to operate a
pool room business of more than 3 pool tables or more than 30%
of the total
floor area.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$256 per application
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$256.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$256
UNIT COST:
$467.00
TOTAL COST:
$467
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(211.00)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(211)
TOTAL UNITS:
1
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
54.82%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$465 per application
June 22, 2010 r,1
I�; 1
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
POOL ROOM PERMIT
REFERENCE NO.
PO -009
NOTE
TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
1
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE
UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE CAPTAIN
0.25
$82.21 1
$82
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE RECORDS SUPV
0.17
$24.48 1
$24
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT
2.00
$360.06 1
$360
TYPE SUBTOTAL
2.42 $466.75
$467
TOTALS 2.42 $467.00 $467 1
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
TAXI VEHICLE PERMIT
PO -011
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
VEHICLE
Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Inspection of a taxi vehicle operating
within the City for safety purposes.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$35 per vehicle per year
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$35.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$3,500
UNIT COST:
$83.59
TOTAL COST:
$8,359
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(48.59)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(4,859)
TOTAL UNITS:
100
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
41.87%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
100%
$85 per vehicle per year
June zz, zuiu
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
TAXI DRIVER PERMIT
PO -012
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request to operate as a taxi driver operating within the City.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$75 per application
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$75.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$7,500
UNIT COST:
$127.74
TOTAL COST:
$12,774
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(52.74)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(5,274)
TOTAL UNITS:
100
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
58.71%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY
OF: 100%
$130 per application
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
TAXI DRIVER PERMIT
PO -012
NOTE
TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
100
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE
UNIT TIME
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE ASSISTANT II
1.25 $97.68 100
$9,768
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERVICE OFFICER
0.33 $30.06 100
$3,006
TYPE SUBTOTAL
1.58
$127.74
$12,774
TOTALS
1.58
$127.74
$12,774
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
MISC. POLICE BUSINESS PERMIT
PO -013
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request to operate a business within the City requiring a police investigation that is not otherwise
listed.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$0.00
TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST:
$467.00
TOTAL COST: $467
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(467.00)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(467)
TOTAL UNITS:
1
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$465 per application
June 22, 2010
rl
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
MISC. POLICE BUSINESS PERMIT
REFERENCE NO.
PO -013
NOTE
TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
1
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE
UNIT TIME
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE CAPTAIN
0.25
$82.21 1
$82
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE RECORDS SUPV
0.17
$24.48 1
$24
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT
2.00 $360.06 1
$360
TYPE SUBTOTAL
2.42 $466.75
$467
TOTALS 2.42 $467.00 $467 1
June 22, 2010 e
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT
PO -014
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Resident/Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request for a concealed weapons permit to determine if the permit is warranted and proper, and to
qualify the applicant for firearms knowledge and skill.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
New - $86 per application
Renewal - $28 per renewal
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $86.00
TOTAL REVENUE: $86
UNIT COST: $937.00
TOTAL COST: $937
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(851.00)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(851)
TOTAL UNITS: 1
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 9.18%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Fee is set by State Penal Code Section 12054:
New - $100 per application ($20 collected on filing the application and the remaining $80 collected on issuance of
the license.)
Renewal - $25 per renewal
Amended - $10 per application
Psychological testing costs are to be added to the above fees up to $150
JVne 22, 2010
055
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT
PO -014
NOTE
TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
1
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE
UNIT TIME
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE CHIEF
0.25
$97.13
1
$97
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE CAPTAIN
0.25
$82.21
1
$82
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE RECORDS SUPV
0.33
$47.52
1
$48
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT
3.00
$540.09
1
$540
TRAFFIC SAFETY POLICE SERGEANT Range
0.75
$169.58
1
$170
TYPE SUBTOTAL
4.58
$936.53
$937
TOTALS 4.58 $937.00 $937
June 22, 2010 l' l�
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
CLEARANCE FORM /LETTER
PO -015
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Resident/Non- Resident.
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request for am employment/immgration clearance form and letter.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$10 per application
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$10.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$200
UNIT COST:
$24.50
TOTAL COST:
$490
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(14.50)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(290)
TOTAL UNITS:
20
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
40.82%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$25 per application
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
CLEARANCE FORM /LETTER PO -015
NOTE TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 20
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE RECORDS SUPV 0.17 $24.48 20 $490
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.17 $24.48 $490
TOTALS 0.17 $24.50 $490 1
June 22, 2010
i; J U
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
RECORDS CHECK - LOCAL
PO -016
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
NAME
Resident/Non- Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request for a local police records check.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$10 per name
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$10.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$20,340
UNIT COST:
$19.81
TOTAL COST:
$40,294
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(9.81)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(19,954)
TOTAL UNITS:
2,034
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
50.48%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$20 per name
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
RECORDS CHECK - LOCAL PO -016
NOTE TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 2,034
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE RECORDS SUPV 0.03 $4.32 2,034 $8,787
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERVICE OFFICER 0.17 $15.49 2,034 $31,507
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.20 $19.81 $40,294
TOTALS
0.20 $19.81 $40,294 1
June 22, 2010 1
y
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
CITATION SIGN -OFF SERVICE
PO -017
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
CITATION
Resident/Non- Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Sign off of mechanical non - compliance or other citations issued by the El Segundo Police Department.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$8 per citation
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$8.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$2,920
UNIT COST:
$15.49
TOTAL COST:
$5,654
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(7.49)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(2,734)
TOTAL UNITS:
365
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
51.64%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
65%
$10 per citation
June «, zulu
�a
ih AL
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
CITATION SIGN -OFF SERVICE PO -017
NOTE TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 366
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERVICE OFFICER 0.17 $15.49 365 $5,654
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.17 $15.49 $5,654
TOTALS 0.17 $15.49 $5,6541
June 22, 2010 1
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
VEHICLE IMPOUND RELEASE
PO -018
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
VEHICLE
Resident/Non- Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Collection and release of vehicles impounded by the City.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Standard Release - $35 per vehicle
DUI Vehicle Release - $115 per vehicle
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$61.05
TOTAL REVENUE:
$39,745
UNIT COST:
$208.12
TOTAL COST:
$135,484
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(147.07)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(95,739)
TOTAL UNITS:
651
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
29.34%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 35%
Standard Impound - $55 per vehicle
30 Day /DUI Impound - $115 per vehicle
June 22, 2010
f!y� 7
k ' 6 J
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
VEHICLE IMPOUND
RELEASE
PO -018
NOTE
TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
651
DEPARTMENT
POSITION
TYPE
UNIT TIME
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN.
POLICE ASSISTANT II
Standard
0.33
$25.79
439
$11,322
POLICE ADMIN.
POLICE SERVICE OFFICER
Standard
0.25
$22.77
439
$9,996
PATROL & SAFETY
POLICE LIEUTENANT
Standard
0.08
$22.05
439
$9,680
PATROL & SAFETY
POLICE OFFICER
Standard - Impound
0.75
$112.79
439
$49,515
TYPE SUBTOTAL
1.41
$183.40
$80,513
POLICE ADMIN.
POLICE ASSISTANT II
30 Day
0.42
$32.82
212
$6,958
POLICE ADMIN.
POLICE SERVICE OFFICER
30 Day
0.25
$22.77
212
$4,827
PATROL & SAFETY
POLICE LIEUTENANT
30 Day
0.33
$90.95
212
$19,281
PATROL & SAFETY
POLICE OFFICER
30 Day - Impound
0.75
$112.76
212
$23,905
TYPE SUBTOTAL
1.75
$259.30
$54,972
TOTALS 3.16 $208.12 $135,484
June 22, 2010
)r
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE/BILLING
PO -019
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
RESPONSE
Resident/Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Responding to an alarm by a Police Officer where the officer can find no evidence of forced entry and it is
concluded that the alarm was activated due to a malfunction or user mistake.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$100 for each alarm over 3 in a calendar year
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $14.91
TOTAL REVENUE: $16,400
UNIT COST: $158.91
TOTAL COST: $174,799
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(144.00)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(158,399)
TOTAL UNITS: 1,100
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 9.38%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
First 3 alarms in a calendar year - No Charge
4th false alarm - $200
5th false alarm - $300
6th and subsequent false alarm - $400
June 1z, zuiu
l'f) )
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE /BILLING
PO -019
NOTE
TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
1,100
DEPARTMENT POSITION
TYPE
UNIT TIME
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PATROL & SAFETY POLICE OFFICER
30 WE Of 2
1.00
$150.38 1,100
$165,418
TYPE SUBTOTAL
1.00
$150.38
$165,418
CRIME INVESTIGATION ADMIN SPECIALIST
Billing
0.75
$57.20 164
$9,381
TYPE SUBTOTAL
0.75
$57.20
$9,381
TOTALS 1.75 $158.91 $174,799
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
POLICE ALARM PERMIT
PO -020
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
APPLICATION
Resident/Business
DESCRIPTION OF.SERVICE
Registering a new intrusion alarm with the Police Department.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$25 per permit
Violation for non -alarm permit - additional $80
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $25.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$1,575
UNIT COST: $57.21
TOTAL COST:
$3,604
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(32.21)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(2,029)
TOTAL UNITS: 63
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
43.70%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 0%
Alarm Permit - No Charge
Violation for non -alarm permit - additional $160
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
POLICE ALARM PERMIT PO -020
NOTE TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 63
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS
CRIME INVESTIGATION ADMIN SPECIALIST 0.75 $57.20 63 $3,604
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.75 $57.20 $3,604
TOTALS 0.75 $57.21 $3,604 1
68
J V I I C-,- 1 V
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
DUI COLLISION RESPONSE
PO -022
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
RESPONSE
Resident/Non- Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Response to a DUI incident which results in property damage, injury, or death.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$95 per hour
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00
TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: $1,283.63
TOTAL COST: $38,609
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,283.63)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(38,609)
TOTAL UNITS: 30
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00 %
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all responding emergency personnel, not to exceed $12,000 per incident
by State law.
June 22, 2010
063
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
DUI COLLISION RESPONSE PO -022
NOTE TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 30
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PATROL & SAFETY POLICE OFFICER 6.00 $902.28 30 $27,068
PATROL & SAFETY POLICE SERGEANT 2.00 $381.34 30 $11,440
TYPE SUBTOTAL 8.00 $1,283.62 $38,509
TOTALS 8.00 $1,283.63 $38,5091
June 22, 2010
1 U
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
'June cc, f 1 v
i� 71
REFERENCE NO.
SERVICE
PO -023
SECOND RESPONSE CALL -BACK
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
RESPONSE
Resident/Business
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Responding to a loud party or similar disturbance of the peace to quiet the activity after an initial warning.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$95 per hour
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00
TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: $227.50
TOTAL COST: $29,575
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(227.50)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(29,575)
TOTAL UNITS: 130
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all responding personnel.
'June cc, f 1 v
i� 71
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
June 22, 2010
V
REFERENCE NO.
SERVICE
SECOND RESPONSE CALL -BACK
PO -023
TOTAL UNITS
NOTE
130
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
TYPE
UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PATROL & SAFETY POLICE OFFICER
1st - 15 WE Of 2
0.50 $75.18 130
$9,773
TYPE SUBTOTAL
0.50 $75.18
$9,773
PATROL & SAFETY POLICE OFFICER
2nd - 1 H/E Of 4
4.00 $601.40 25
$15,035
PATROL & SAFETY POLICE SERGEANT
2nd
1.00 $190.67 25
$4,767
TYPE SUBTOTAL
5.00 $792.07
$19,802
TOTALS
5.50 $227.50
$29,575
June 22, 2010
V
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
Jul lu A" Gu 1 V
REFERENCE NO.
SERVICE
PO -024
BOOKING SERVICE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
BOOKING
Resident/Non- Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing the booking of an arrestee.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00
TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: $213.95
TOTAL COST: $115,533
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(213.95)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(115,533)
TOTAL UNITS: 540
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$215 per booking to be collected upon conviction
Jul lu A" Gu 1 V
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
June 22, 2010
U It
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
REFERENCE NO.
SERVICE PO -024A
DUI ARREST
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE ARREST Resident/Non- Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing the arrest of a person on the suspicion of DUI.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: $637.56 TOTAL COST: $54,193
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(637.56) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(54,193)
TOTAL UNITS: 85 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$640 per arrest to be collected upon conviction
June 22 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
.tune zz, zuiu
,
Ul „
U
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
REFERENCE NO.
SERVICE PO -025
SPECIAL EVENT POLICE SERVICE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE HOUR Business /Comm. Group
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Providing Police services to special events such as parades, fairs, circuses, athletic events, etc.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$95 per hour
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $95.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $95
UNIT COST: $153.00 TOTAL COST: $153
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(58.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(58)
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 62.09%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all required personnel.
Mina 99 9n1n
1 j
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
June cc, cu i u
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
REFERENCE NO.
SERVICE PO -026
FINGERPRINTING ON REQUEST
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE e CE RECIPIENT
POLICE PRINT dent/Non- Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Providing fingerprint service on request for employment or personal reasons.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$10 per application plus any DOJ fees
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $10.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $10,190
UNIT COST: $30.06 TOTAL COST: $30,631
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(20.06) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(20,441)
TOTAL UNITS:
1,019 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 33.27%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$30 per application plus any DOJ fees
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
REFERENCE NO.
SERVICE
POLICE REPORT /DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION PO -027
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE DOCUMENT Resident/Non- Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Providing copies of a crime report, accident report, or other Police documents.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Arrest Report - $67
Traffic Collision Report - No Charge
Daily Report - No Charge
Other Report - No Charge
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: $0.78 TOTAL COST: $1,560
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(0.78) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,560)
TOTAL UNITS: 2,000 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
As this service is covered by the Public Records Act, the City copy fee is:
$0.20 per page
(18i
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
June 22, 2010 U 6 ' 11
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
REFERENCE NO.
SERVICE
POLICE PHOTO REPRODUCTION PO -028
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE PHOTO Resident/Non- Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Providing copies of crime or accident photographs on request.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$5 per copy
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $5.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $500
UNIT COST: $32.57 TOTAL COST: $3,257
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(27.57) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,757)
TOTAL UNITS: 100 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 15.35%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$30 per request
ii imp 99 gm n
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
June 22, 2010 L! 8
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
REFERENCE NO.
SERVICE PO -029
POLICE DISPATCH TAPE COPY
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE TAPE Resident/Non- Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Providing dispatch tape copies on request.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: $103.07 TOTAL COST: $3,092
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(103.07) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(3,092)
TOTAL UNITS: 30 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00 %
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$100 per request
Juno 22 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
.tune ZZ, Zulu
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
REFERENCE NO.
SERVICE
POLICE AUDIO/VIDEO TAPE COPY PO -030
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT FUNITOF VICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE Resident/Non- Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Providing Police audio or video tape /DVD copies on request.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$5 per copy
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $5.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $150
UNIT COST: $156.20 TOTAL COST: $4,686
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(151.20) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(4,536)
TOTAL UNITS: 30 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 3.20%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$155 per tape /DVD
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
POLICE AUDIO/VIDEO TAPE COPY
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE RECORDS SUPV
PATROL & SAFETY POLICE SERGEANT
CRIME INVESTIGATION CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATOR
TYPE SUBTOTAL
TOTALS
REFERENCE NO.
PO -030
TOTAL UNITS
30
UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.08
$11.52 30
$346
0.50
$95.34 30
$2,860
0.50
$49.35 30
$1,481
1.08
$156.21
$4,686
1.08 $156.20 $4,686
June 22, 2010 0 6- U
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
REFERENCE NO.
rDESCRIPTION PO -032
LICENSE
RTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
LICENSE Resident
OF SERVICE
ued as required in the California Vehicle Cod e on behalf of the DMV.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
New - $4 per license
Renewal - $2 per license
The fees are set by the State.
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0
TOTAL UNITS:
I PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 0%
It is suggested that the City discontinue this fee.
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
BICYCLE LICENSE PO -032
NOTE TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0.00 $0.00 0 $0
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0
0.00 $0.00
June 22, 2010
$0 1
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
ANIMAL AT -LARGE PICKUP
PO -040
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
ANIMAL
Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Pick up of a stray at -large animal.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
1 st offense - $7.50
2nd offense - $15
3rd offense - $25
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$7.51
TOTAL REVENUE:
$563
UNIT COST:
$38.75
TOTAL COST:
$2,906
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(31.24)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(2,343)
TOTAL UNITS:
75
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
19.37%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
100%
1st offense - $10
2nd offense - $25
3rd and subsequent offense - $40
June 22, 2010 ((ll
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ANIMAL AT -LARGE PICKUP PO -040
NOTE TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 75
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
ANIMAL CONTROL POLICE SERVICE OFFICER 0.50 $38.74 75 $2,906
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50 $38.74 $2,906
TOTALS 0.50 $38.75 $2,906 1
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
VICIOUS ANIMAL HEARING
PO -041
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
HEARING
Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Conducting an investigation and hearing to determine if a particular
animal should be classified as vicious.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$0.00
TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST:
$2,483.00
TOTAL COST: $2,483
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(2,483.00)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,483)
TOTAL UNITS:
1
PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
0%
No Fee is recommended
July 21, 2010
rl
VI J
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
VICIOUS ANIMAL HEARING
REFERENCE NO.
PO -041
NOTE
TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
1
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE
UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE CHIEF
0.50 $194.27
1
$194
POLICE ADMIN. POLICE CAPTAIN
0.50
$164.41
1
$164
TRAFFIC SAFETY POLICE LIEUTENANT
2.50
$673.85
1
$674
TRAFFIC SAFETY POLICE SERGEANT
3.50
$791.39
1
$791
ANIMAL CONTROL POLICE SERVICE OFFICER
8.50
$658.58
1
$659
TYPE SUBTOTAL
15.50 $2,482.50
$2,483
TOTALS 15.50 $2,483.00 $2,483
june«,,euiu U ZJ ,3
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
ANIMAL TRAP RENTAL
PO -046
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
TRAP
Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Rental of traps to catch stray animals on request
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$75 deposit per trap
There is no charge for the use of the trap.
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
$0
UNIT COST: $19.38
TOTAL COST:
$969
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(19.38)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(969)
TOTAL UNITS: 50
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 0%
No Change
June 22, 2010 r"
u9j
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ANIMAL TRAP RENTAL PO -046
NOTE TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 50
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
ANIMAL CONTROL POLICE SERVICE OFFICER 0.25 $19.37 50 $969
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.25 $19.37 $969
TOTALS 0.25 $19.38 $969 1
June 22, 2010
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
REFERENCE NO.
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
PO -047
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UNIT OF SERVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
POLICE
LICENSE
Resident
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Assuring that dogs and other animals
are free of disease, safe, and under control sufficient not to create a public
nuisance or health hazard.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Dog License:
Regular - $40
Spayed or Neutered - $20
Seniors - $10
Late Fee - $10
REVENUE AND COST
COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
$11.56
TOTAL REVENUE:
$16,168
UNIT COST:
$248.74
TOTAL COST:
$347,987
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(237.18)
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$(331,819)
TOTAL UNITS:
1,399
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
4.65%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF:
5%
No Change
June 22, 2010 l� r.y
u ✓ 1
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2009 -2010
SERVICE
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
REFERENCE NO.
PO -047
NOTE
TOTAL UNITS
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
1,399
DEPARTMENT POSITION
TYPE
UNIT TIME
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
TRAFFIC SAFETY POLICE SERVICE OFFICER
90%
1.07
$97.54
1,399
$136,458
ANIMAL CONTROL POLICE SERVICE OFFICER
Remainder
1.15
$89.14
1,399
$124,707
ANIMAL CONTROL POL SERVICE OFFICER - PT
100%
0.71
$33.69
1,399
$47,132
ANIMAL CONTROL
Overtime /Holiday
0.00
$3.07
1,399
$4,295
ANIMAL CONTROL
Contract Services
0.00 $6.43
1,399
$8,996
ANIMAL CONTROL
SPCA Contract
0.00 $18.87
1,399
$26,399
TYPE SUBTOTAL
2.94 $248.74
$347,987
TOTALS
2.94 $248.74 $347,987 1
uune zz, zu i u , I .i
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 17, 2010
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Continuation of Council's consideration to transition the El Segundo Fire Department's
( "ESFD ") services to the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (aka the
Los Angeles County Fire Department), including possible action to direct staff to proceed with
negotiations with the Los Angeles County Fire Department for annexation of the El Segundo
Fire Department to the Fire District pursuant to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
authorization of the attached Feasibility Study. Additionally, the Council will consider possible
action to direct staff to undertake further analysis of potential impacts including, without
limitation, an analysis pursuant to Elections Code § 9212 regarding an initiative petition
currently being circulated that would require, if adopted, that ESFD's services be performed by
the County.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Consideration and possible action to direct staff to proceed with negotiations with
the Los Angeles County Fire Department for annexation of the El Segundo Fire
Department to the Fire District pursuant to the Los Angeles County Board of
Supervisors authorization of the attached Feasibility Study.
2. Consideration and possible action to direct staff to undertake further analysis of
the impacts of transitioning ESFD to the County including, without limitation, an
analysis under Elections Code § 9212 regarding the initiative petition currently
being circulated that would require, if adopted, that ESFD be transitioned to the
County.
3. Alternatively, take other related action as directed by Council.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Feasibility Study for Provision of Fire Protection Services by Los Angeles County Fire
Department
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Amount Requested: $
Additional Appropriation:
Account Number(s):
ORIGINATED BY: Kevin Smith, Fire Chief
REVIEWED BY: Kevin Smith, Fire Chief
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manager
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
On December 1, 2009, the City Council directed that staff request the County of Los Angeles to
prepare an analysis of a potential transition of ESFD services to the County. The County Fire r-�
C
iJ .-) J
Department has completed its Feasibility Study which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The
Feasibility Study is to be presented to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors for approval
on August 17, 2010.
The report generally provides for the County to staff Station 1 with a 3- person paramedic
assessment engine and a 2- person paramedic squad, and Station 2 with a 3- person paramedic
assessment engine and a 4- person truck/quint apparatus, for a total of 12 on -duty daily plus fire
prevention staffing, at an anticipated 2010 -11 annual cost of $10.1 million.
On May 13, 2010, the City Clerk's Office received a notice of intent to circulate a petition to
require that the City transition its Fire Department services to the County. As required by law,
the City Attorney's Office prepared the Title and Summary for the initiative. On May 20, 2010,
the Clerk's Office transmitted such to the circulator of the petition. The circulator has up until
November 17, 2010 (180 days from the time the circulator was presented with the Title and
Summary), to collect signatures for the petition.
Elections Code § 9212 provides as follows:
"a) During the circulation of the petition ... the legislative body may refer the proposed
initiative measure to any city agency or agencies for a report on any or all of the
following:
(1) Its fiscal impact.
(2) Its effect on the internal consistency of the city's general and specific plans ...
the consistency between planning and zoning, and the limitations on city actions
under Section 65008 of the Government Code....
(3) Its effect on the use of land, the impact on the availability and location of
housing, and the ability of the city to meet its regional housing needs.
(4) Its impact on funding for infrastructure of all types, including, but not limited
to, transportation, schools, parks, and open space. The report may also discuss
whether the measure would be likely to result in increased infrastructure costs or
savings, including the costs of infrastructure maintenance, to current residents and
businesses.
(5) Its impact on the community's ability to attract and retain business and
employment.
(6) Its impact on the uses of vacant parcels of land.
(7) Its impact on agricultural lands, open space, traffic congestion, existing
business districts, and developed areas designated for revitalization.
(8) Any other matters the legislative body requests to be in the report.
2
(b) The report shall be presented to the legislative body within the time prescribed by the
legislative body, but no later than 30 days after the elections official certifies to the
legislative body the sufficiency of the petition."
Since the City was already analyzing the potential transition of ESFD to the County months
before the initiative petition was presented to the City Clerk's Office, the City is generally not
constrained by the thirty day time limit in Elections Code § 9212.
However, the Los Angeles County Feasibility Study does not contain any information regarding
the initiative petition; the City Council may have specific questions or issues addressed that are
unique to the initiative petition that it wants staff to address as allowed by the Elections Code.
Additionally, Council may have questions or issues that relate to the potential transition of ESFD
services to the County, regardless of whether such is the result of Council action or the initiative
process.
Staff understands that this is an important issue for the Council and the community and wants to
be proactive in providing information necessary to the decision making process.
lOX
FEASIBILITY STUDY
FOR THE PROVISION OF FIRE PROTECTION,
PARAMEDIC AND INCIDENTAL SERVICES
1;10110
THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
THE CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
July 23, 2010
lo-21
PN" AS�t�rr .,r:r "1'S7'CIDY'F'ORSERVCC ".C"S l "f> iHC "C; "r;1 "?'C)F "ILL SCs'GI./NI)C)13Y'7:Hr
C.'C)NSU.LrD�1 "1'ED f IRE PI? 07:ECTION DI S'C RIC; 7' C)F L0S ANGELES COO N`TY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction .................. ............................... 3
............................. ...............................
II. Executive Summary ................................................................. ............................... 4
III. City of El Segundo ............ ............................... 6
IV, Proposed Operation by the Fire District .................................. ............................... 8
V. Financial Analysis ................................................................... ............................... 10
VI. Benefits of Annexing the City to the Fire District ................... ............................... 13
VII. Transition from City to District .............................................. ............................... 22
VIII. Summary ............................................................................... ............................... 26
Appendix:
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Glossary of Terms
Description of Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles
County
Additional District Services
Annexation Process
2
lJ
f,— Slli)T.,fTS'.S'IIIZ)YF))R SERVIC,'E TO T HI C'r ?`Y' c)l+ r;.r SITGUNDO B'Y T �f IF
CONSOLLOA.Tf D laf1?1 -' 1'IZOTTC:I'I()N 1)IST'IZICT OI' f OS ANGTTIJ 4 COUNTY
I. INTRODUCTION
On December 1, 2009, the El Segundo City Council requested a proposal for the
provision of Fire Protection, Paramedic, and Incidental Services from the Consolidated
Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (Fire District). On December 2, 2009, the
Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (Board) directed that the guidelines for
preparing such proposals be revised to include specific criteria regarding liabilities,
benefits, and financial risk. The new guidelines were prepared in consultation with the
Chief Executive Office, Auditor - Controller, and County Counsel, and approved by the
Board on July 13, 2010.
In accordance with the recently approved guidelines, this feasibility study was prepared
to outline for the Board the Fire District's preliminary recommendations for proposed
staffing in the City of El Segundo and provide preliminary findings regarding the:
• reciprocal benefits to Los Angeles County and Fire District residents and
businesses, as well as those of El Segundo, including increased staffing and units
that will be available to the Fire District and El Segundo;
evaluation of any increased County risk exposures and costs, including but not
limited to liability and workers compensation benefits, to ensure that the fee
structure would include a proportional charge for such costs to the City of
El Segundo, and if appropriate, a charge back of any unique costs identified for
the City's contract; and
• evaluation of the City of El Segundo's financial solvency, in consultation with the
Auditor - Controller, using the City's last published Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report (CAFR).
If authorized by the Board, the Fire Chief would submit this feasibility study to the City of
El Segundo for review. The City would then determine whether or not to proceed with
negotiations for annexation to the Fire District. If the City decides to proceed, it would be
required to sign a Reimbursement Agreement that ensures payment to the Fire District of
its costs for evaluating the City's facilities, equipment and vehicles to determine potential
one -time costs of conversion to Fire District operation.
If negotiations with the City are successful, the Fire District would return to your Board
with final recommendations and request that the Board make application to the Local
Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to annex the City of El Segundo to the Fire
District. Appendix D outlines the steps in the annexation process.
U4
£Z;A5LI3II ;I:1)'S'TIIl72'I�C�K CxlltVf)tJ8':1:1�I
GCV57IIDA7' fONP
IL,i CI ) C F, COUNn
II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Annexation of the City of El Segundo to the Fire District would provide reciprocal benefits
to both agencies. The City and Fire District's common boundary, alongside the western
boundaries of the unincorporated area of Del Aire and the City of Hawthorne, is
conducive for economically sharing resources. The City would benefit from the Fire
District's regional and specialized resources, while the Fire District and Los Angeles
County would benefit from the additional resources that would be staffed within the City.
The Fire District would operate the City of El Segundo's two fire stations, Station 1
located on Main Street on the western side of the City, and new Station 2 located on
Mariposa Avenue on the eastern side, for a total 2010 -11 estimated cost of $10.1 million.
Constant staffing for both City stations with two assessment engine companies, one truck
company and one paramedic squad would provide a total staffing of 12 uniformed
personnel on -duty daily in the City, plus fire prevention staff.
A service contract between the Fire District and the City would provide benefits to both
agencies, including:
➢ Specialized Fire District resources such as hazardous materials and
urban search and rescue squads are constantly staffed and would be
available to respond within the City as needed. Within 5 miles of the
City, 24 District units are constantly staffed and would respond to major
or simultaneous incidents within the City.
➢ Engine and truck company response times to the unincorporated area
of Del Aire would improve due to the proximity of El Segundo Station
2, and City units would also be available as second -due units when
simultaneous or large -scale incidents occur within the vicinity.
The Fire District's fee structure ensures that the City of EI Segundo would pay its
proportional share of costs associated with providing fire protection and emergency
medical services, including expenses such as liability, workers compensation, and
overhead. Additionally, a review of the City's 2009 Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report concluded that it is anticipated that the City would be able to meet its financial
commitments to the Fire District. Specifically, this study found:
1) The Fire District's rate structure for salary and employee benefits ensures the City
of El Segundo would proportionally share in the worker's compensation costs
associated with positions assigned to the City of El Segundo.
2) Transferring City employee would be required to leave retirement contributions on
deposit with CalPERS and establish reciprocity with LACERA, limiting the Fire
District's retirement benefit costs. The employee's LACERA contribution rate
would be based on his or her age upon entering the CalPERS system. The Fire
District's rate structure for salary and employee benefits includes a component for
retirement costs for positions staffing City stations, and therefore the District costs
would be fee offset.
4 ..
YU..
PI:�1 SIl3l:T,17Y,SI'VDY'.f {()It S s:.I?VICES '1 3 TIIL' C"I'I'Y'0F s'L S1' Ll.NllC3 13Y7F3: s
CONS()I,.IDAIT'D FIR P11OTEC710N.1)I: CC)UN7 f'
3) The Fire District's overhead rate includes actual liability costs incurred by the
District over the last five fiscal years. The proposed annual fee for the City of
El Segundo would include a proportional amount of liability costs based upon City
staffing costs.
4) The Los Angeles County's Office of the Auditor - Controller has assisted the
District's review of the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR) for
both 2008 and 2009. Based on the guidelines developed by the Government
Finance Officers Association (GFOA) for evaluating a city's adequate level of fund
balance necessary to mitigate current and future risks, the City met the GFOA's
criteria for determining solvency in 2008 and 2009.
Based upon the above evaluation, the following Board actions are recommended:
1) Authorize the Fire Chief of the Fire District to provide a copy of the Feasibility
Study to the City of El Segundo.
2) Authorize the Fire Chief to begin the process of negotiations and, should the City
Council of the City of El Segundo decide to proceed, to execute a Reimbursement
Agreement with the City.
3) Upon successful conclusion of negotiations with the City, direct the Fire Chief to
report back to your Board requesting adoption of a resolution making application to
LAFCO for the annexation of the City to the Fire District and, upon LAFCO's
approval of the annexation, to return to your Board requesting final approval of the
negotiated annexation agreement as approved by the City Council.
106
P.f'ASCf3.CC,I:I"Y S'C "CId)�'I "C�ft S.fs'f�Vl[;'IS :Cl� I�fitfs C II"�' [ff' f;.L SCs[;�t"�JI)C] C3�' "ZHfs
CONSOLIDATED FIRE . 1, RO' f" fsCl-'[ ONI) L5I] ?I(,'I't.)FL()SANCIaLL'SCOUNlY
III. THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
The City of El Segundo is located in southwest Los Angeles County. It is bordered by the
unincorporated area of Del Aire and the City of Hawthorne to the east, the City of
Los Angeles to the north, the City of Manhattan Beach to the south, and the Pacific
Ocean to the west.
El Segundo is both a small coastal community, as well as a transitional corporate
town. Despite its size of 5'/2 square miles, El Segundo has the second highest
concentration of Fortune 500 companies in California, behind only San Francisco. Some
of the City's industrial sites are being transitioned into shopping malls, office space and
sports facilities. The City is also adjacent to the Los Angeles International Airport and
within 15 miles of the Port of Los Angeles, making the City very appealing for regional
and international business opportunities. In 2006, El Segundo won an Eddy award for
being the most business - friendly city in Los Angeles County.
Some of the pertinent statistics of the City are:
Population:
Area:
Assessed Valuation:
Annual Fire Dept. Emergency Incidents
El Segundo Fire Department
16,700 Residents, 70,000 Daytime
5.5 Square Miles
$9.9 Billion (2009)
2,425 (3 -Year Average)
The City of El Segundo Fire Department is currently administered by a Fire Chief, a
Deputy Chief and three Battalion Chiefs that serve as platoon /shift commanders. Civilian
employees serve as the Fire Marshal, Emergency Management Coordinator and Fire
Prevention Specialists.
6 U�
FITASII.3ILIT.YSTUDY-FOR SERVIC;'I ;S I"O 7I11; G'I'I Y CIFIs.I., SI: "( CJNI)013f' 7I I:s'
CONSOLIDATL'.OI"IRIs -' I? O: CLC" t "I()N.,OI:S`X:I?ICI'OFLOSA.N(; ''LT,'SC: "OIJNTI
The City's fire protection and emergency medical services are provided from two fire
stations. Fire Station 1 houses two fire engines, one paramedic rescue unit and one
Battalion Chief. Fire Station 2 houses one fire engine, one fire truck (quint) and one
paramedic rescue unit. When fully staffed, on -duty daily suppression staff is 19 per day
(one Battalion Chief, four Captains, four Engineers, five Paramedics and five
Firefighters). However, budgetary restrictions have reduced staffing in the City to a
minimum of 14 personnel per day, depending on absences and vacancies. As a result,
staffing on one engine and the truck is sometimes reduced from four to three persons,
and one of the City's three engine companies is often not staffed.
At each station, the City has a state -of- the -art rescue ambulance with updated
equipment and full transportation capabilities, staffed with two paramedics on each
vehicle. Other City resources that are not constantly staffed include one urban search
and rescue (USAR) OES Type I heavy vehicle, two multi - casualty equipment trailers,
and some reserve apparatus.
The El Segundo Fire Department has 24 members that have current OES Heavy
Inventory Level Certification. Twelve of these members serve as USAR instructors. All
suppression members are required to be Hazmat First Responder Operations (FRO)
trained and Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs). All paramedics are cross - trained
as firefighter /paramedics.
Dispatch & Communications
The City recently contracted with the South Bay Regional Public Communications
Authority, which serves as the City's public safety answering point (PSAP).
Mutual Aid
El Segundo receives greater mutual aid through the Area G Mutual Aid Agreement (cities
of El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach and Torrance) and
also through the Fire Department Mutual Apparatus and Equipment Loan Agreement with
Area G cities (Torrance excluded).
In addition, an Exchange for Fire Protection and Rescue Services (Automatic Aid)
Agreement was executed by the City and the Fire District in 1996. This agreement
authorizes a reciprocal exchange of services between the two agencies, at no cost to
either agency, through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that was approved by
both agencies in 2006. The MOU details the day -to -day operations of both agencies and
is not intended to replace or adjust any Uniform Mutual Assistance Agreement which may
be in effect. The City also has automatic aid agreements with the cities of Manhattan
Beach and Los Angeles.
ASI131L1:1 "l`,S:I "Llt)Y'I()I� 3I .IdVCCJ'.S :T!)TIMC;'I:1VOTt IsI; 1 CTLINriC)I31'7:711"
ONSOLIMTED .F11?E i'Itf)'I:I.�C;TION.D1, IrIC;':1" C)1 .LC�S 1_NC I Z .l�; G'C)CIN "I f'
IV. PROPOSED OPERATION BY THE FIRE DISTRICT
The Fire District has evaluated the fire protection and emergency medical service needs
of the City of El Segundo and developed the following proposed staffing level, resource
deployment, and an estimated 2010 -11 annual fee structure for Fire District services:
Operations Staffing:
City
Post (a) Estimated 2010 -11
Position
Station Equipment s
Assessment Engine
Paramedic Squad
2 Assessment Engine
Truck
Total Daily On -Duty Station Staffing
Fire Prevention Staffing:
Fire Protection Engineering Asst. II (Plan Check)
Captain
Fire Fighter Specialist (Inspector)
Total Estimated Salary and Employee Benefits
Overhead @ 33.6539%
Estimated 2010 -11 Annual Fee
3
2
4
12
0.5
0.25
1.5
Resource Cost
$1,810,008 (b>
$1,181,391
$1,874,229
$2,304,372
$59,587
$49,497
$251,382
$7,530,466
2,534,295
$10,064,761
Ambulance transport within the Fire District is normally done through private
ambulance contracts administered by the Los Angeles County Department of
Health Services (DHS). However, the Fire District will work with the City of
El Segundo and DHS to determine the viability of the City maintaining an
ambulance transport program in concert with Fire District station personnel, similar
to the program operated by the City of La Habra.
(a) Three persons staff each post position through a 56 -hour work week. Station operations include overtime
required to maintain 24 -hour constant staffing.
(b) The paramedic squad cost includes three paramedic bonuses - -one for each of the two paramedics
assigned to the squad itself, and one for the paramedic assigned to the assessment engine..
BUJ
IT ASIBIL17Y STLrr).YFOR .S:ERVI(,'I.5 I'() Ti c,' (,'ITV° c.Y 1�'r 5r GUNIjO B 'r F
C C)NSOI,rI)A:I1✓T) FII,U? I'Rf11 L(;'1 CC)N,DI.S'I IiICT OI''Lo S ANG }FTC's G "OLJNT '
Below is the Fire District's proposed staffing as compared to the City's current
configuration:
(a) On 10/1/2009, staffing ran down to 17 due to budgetary reasons, up to 2 firefighters or one firefighter and one
paramedic. This often reduced the staffing of one engine from 4 to 3 and the staffing of the Quint from 4 to 3.
(b) On 3/1/2010, further budgetary reductions required that staffing can be run down to 14 per day. This often
results in shutting down one Engine company.
(c) The on -duty District Battalion Chief who would be assigned to the City is located at District Fire Station 161 and
is not included in the District's total staffing in the City.
Insurance Services Office (ISO) Fire Protection Class
This City's current ISO protection class is a rating of "Y. The annexation of the City to
the Fire District and the proposed staffing level would not result in a rating change to the
City.
iilJ
City of El Segundo
I District Proposal
Station
Unit/Apparatus Type
Staffing
Unit/Apparatus Type
Staffing
Paramedic Assessment
Engine
3 -4(a)
Engine
0 -3(b)
Paramedic Assessment Engine
3
Paramedic Rescue Unit
2
Paramedic Squad
2
Battalion Chief
1
Engine
3
Paramedic Assessment Quint
3 -4(a)
Paramedic Assessment Engine
3
2
Paramedic Rescue Unit
2
Quint
4
Total Daily Permanent Staffing
14 -19
12(')
(a) On 10/1/2009, staffing ran down to 17 due to budgetary reasons, up to 2 firefighters or one firefighter and one
paramedic. This often reduced the staffing of one engine from 4 to 3 and the staffing of the Quint from 4 to 3.
(b) On 3/1/2010, further budgetary reductions required that staffing can be run down to 14 per day. This often
results in shutting down one Engine company.
(c) The on -duty District Battalion Chief who would be assigned to the City is located at District Fire Station 161 and
is not included in the District's total staffing in the City.
Insurance Services Office (ISO) Fire Protection Class
This City's current ISO protection class is a rating of "Y. The annexation of the City to
the Fire District and the proposed staffing level would not result in a rating change to the
City.
iilJ
FLAS.IBII_,I Y 51 "LID k' ! %C�.K '�Is'I� VIC'd{ S o 77111;' 11 ;' C I:T' OT EL 4Is "GUNDO t1'Y : HIF
CONSOL.IDA PED FIR I'KCa71sC; "1 "If�.N IiISd 7� IC;'I " OF LOS A NGT'Y S C ()UNlY
V. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Annual Fee for District Services
The Fire District's estimated 2010 -11 Annual Fee is comprised of salaries, employee
benefits, and overhead costs for the proposed staffing level to be provided within the City.
This estimated annual fee amount can be compared to the City's current Fire
Department budget, plus any Fire Department related costs incurred by the City and not
a part of the Fire Department budget, to project the amount of savings the City would
have realized had it been annexed to the Fire District the entire fiscal year. The annual
fee, as described in this report, would fund all fire suppression, hazardous materials
response, fire prevention, emergency medical services, and support functions such as
dispatching, training, equipment maintenance, supplies, procurement, and all other
services required for the effective operation of a modern fire department.
The City would pay the annual fee directly from municipal funds. The annual fee would
be prorated on a monthly basis; payments by the City would be due monthly in advance.
Interest would be added to any payment received after the due date.
Fire protection, hazardous materials, and emergency medical services would not be
performed unless the City:
Has available funds previously appropriated to cover the annual fee
and
Has paid the appropriated funds to the District.
Approximately 60 days prior to the upcoming Fire District fiscal year (July 1 — June 30),
the Fire District would provide the City an estimate of the fee for the following year.
When the Fire District has information available to determine the actual annual fee, the
Fire District would present the City with a statement reflecting the difference between the
actual and estimated fee. An adjustment representing that difference would be charged
or credited to the City over the following 12 months in the subsequent fiscal year.
Annual Fee Payment Cap:
The minimum term of an annexation agreement between the City and the Fire District
would be ten years. A five and one -half percent (5.5 %) payment cap would be placed on
any increases to the City's annual fee each year for the first five years of the Agreement.
This payment cap applies only to the City's annual fee payment amount (i.e., the salary,
employee benefits, and overhead cost). Calculation of the payment cap would not
include any conversion costs, credits, rebates, etc., which may be factored into the City's
monthly payment amount.
For the sixth year of the Agreement term, the payment cap would be the average of the
immediately preceding four years' percentage increases in the annual fee plus one
percent. For the seventh year of the Agreement and each subsequent year, the payment
10
iii
I yFASIt3lII:II',4:TCIU�'..f%C)R S.is'li�V /CI %;5 �fi 7'f,Cls" C'I Z"�'t)I%.I.L S�;CTZJNI)C) h'�' �""flls'
CONSOLIDATE') HI1IT.PRf)71.sC ` f IC)Nl)I :S:f 11t[:T ).Cf .I (�S A.NCxI `T.f S COUN:Tj,'
cap would be the average of the immediately preceding five years' percentage increases
plus one percent.
In any year where the City's annual fee payment amount exceeded the preceding year's
payment amount plus the applicable payment cap, payment of the excess amount would
be deferred to a subsequent fiscal year where the increase in the annual fee payment for
that fiscal year over the preceding fiscal year is less than the payment cap. The excess
amount would be repaid by the City in any subsequent fiscal year to the extent the City's
annual fee payment increase in that fiscal year is less than the excess amount for that
fiscal year.
Workers Compensation:
The "Resource Cost" as stated in the Estimated 2010 -11 Annual Fee (page 8) is based
upon "Uniform Position Costs" (UPC) calculations that comprise both salaries and
employee benefits for firefighter series positions. Workers compensation costs are
included as part of those employee benefit calculations. The total estimated workers
compensation costs that the City of El Segundo would fund, as included in the total
Estimated Salary and Employee Benefits, is $518,311.
Liability:
The Fire District's overhead rate includes actual liability costs incurred by the District over
the last five fiscal years. The overhead rate is charged as a factor to the total S &EB
costs in the City. Therefore, the Estimated Annual Fee for services would include the
City's proportional share of liability costs. Based upon the Estimated 2010 -11 Annual
Fee, the total estimated liability costs that the City of El Segundo would fund as part of
the overhead charge is $16,107.
Fire District Special Tax:
The City would not be a part of the Fire District's special tax for fire and paramedic
services.
Conversion Costs:
Certain items of City apparatus, equipment, and facilities would require conversion,
repair, upgrade, or replacement to be compatible with Fire District operations and meet
Fire District standards. The City would be required to reimburse to the Fire District all
expenditures made to convert to Fire District operations.
A comprehensive evaluation and conversion cost estimate would be completed by the
Fire District if negotiations are authorized. Before the survey is conducted for City
stations and equipment, the City would be required to enter into a Reimbursement
Agreement with the Fire District for the reimbursement of the costs incurred by the Fire
District in completing the survey.
Revenues:
Revenues, if any, generated by the Fire District for its services would be revenues of the
Fire District. Those revenues may include fees from hazardous materials inspections
(recovery of costs) or others. Revenues derived by the City for Fire District services such
11
.17LA 4If3ILC7"Y ST11r?Y "IYM S,ERVIC1,74 rr) C r ° r f of+" r. , . rr >r�rvrlr B Y TH:
CONSOLIDATI D I1 %PROT'TXT[0N.DP; 1?1CT CSI{ L0,5ANGIMLYS COUN7 T
as business license inspections may be collected and retained by the City as long as they
are not in conflict with any Fire District charges. Should the City undertake a City
ambulance transport program, any revenues the City would derive from such a program
would be retained by the City.
City Annexations:
The annual fee for service is predicated upon the City's current service requirements and
boundaries. To maintain adequate levels of service, increases in fire and emergency
medical services resources may be needed by the Fire District if City annexations occur.
Should the City annex additional territory, City and Fire District would need to assess
resultant service needs.
El Segundo Solvency Calculation
El Segundo's solvency calculation is based upon the City's 2008 and 2009
Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR). Both the Government Finance
Officers Association (GFOA) and the Los Angeles County Auditor - Controller's Office
recommend that, at a minimum, the Unreserved (unrestricted) General Fund Balance for
a city should be no less than two months of regular general fund operating revenue
or regular general fund operating expenditures. In addition, the GFOA recommends
that the financial resources available in other funds be considered in assessing the
adequacy of the unrestricted fund balance. Therefore, the Auditor - Controller's Office
recommends that the balance in the City of El Segundo's Economic Uncertainty fund be
included in tests to determine the City's solvency.
Applying the GFOA and Auditor Controller's recommended criteria to the City's 2008 and
2009 CAFRs, in both years the total available fund balances have exceeded both the
City's General Fund Revenue and General Fund Expenditures and, thus, the City of
El Segundo has met the criteria for determining solvency for 2008 and 2009, as follows:
2008 CAFR Analysis
Unreserved General Fund Balance $14,004,971
Economic Security Fund $5,317,570
Total 2008 Fund Balances
General Fund Revenue Two Month Fund Balance
General Fund Expenditures Two Month Fund Balance
2009 CAFR Analysis
Unreserved General Fund Balance $8,224,712
Economic Security Fund $2,129,495
Total 2009 Fund Balances
General Fund Revenue Two Month Fund Balance
General Fund Expenditures Two Month Fund Balance
12
$19,322,541
$8,720,085
$9,676,460
$10,354,207
$9,096,396
$10,237,576
11,
r:F�tSrl3lrl? Y "s7'I,Tli1'.xC).xi 1IRVICES :I "O 7x 1," CITY'O EL Sh,G1JN.D013YT:HE
C "C�NSC)LI17A'I 1) r r1Z[ 1'rtO:1 s "C; `I "IC)N I)lS Cl C+C "7" � 1 " i,l�S ANGI LES COUNT Y
VI. BENEFITS OF ANNEXATION TO THE FIRE DISTRICT
Both the City and the Fire District provide outstanding fire protection and emergency
medical services. However, the Fire District, due to its overall size and economy of
scale, is able to provide a broader range of in- depth, quality services than most municipal
fire departments. There are certain benefits to being part of a larger organization that
strives to be an attentive and responsive "hometown fire department" to each of the cities
and communities it serves. For a general background of the Fire District, please see
Appendix B.
Regional Concept of Services Delivery
The Fire District operates under a regional approach in providing emergency services to
its Fire District cities and unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County. Some of the
nearby cities and communities that are served by the Fire District include Inglewood,
Hawthorne, Gardena, Lawndale, Lennox, Ladera Heights, Alondra Park, Del Aire, Athens
and Westmont. To ensure the best response times possible, the closest available
resource is dispatched to an incident, regardless of jurisdictional or municipal boundaries,
thereby providing an optimum level of service. Both the Fire District and the City would
benefit from annexation of the City as follows:
Benefit to City: The City would benefit from the 24 District emergency response
units located within five miles of the City stations, which would be available to
provide enhanced responses to large incidents, and /or simultaneous incidents
when the City's units are assigned to other incidents. A preliminary review of
costs compared to the City of El Segundo's $15.7 million budget for its Fire
Department indicates City costs would be reduced. However, the City would need
to make this determination after it carefully considered all costs and revenues
associated with fire protection and emergency medical services in the City.
Benefit to the County: The unincorporated Del Aire community, as well as some
areas within the western Hawthorne area, would benefit from the proximity of City
Station 2. In addition, because truck companies' jurisdictions cover a larger area
than the first -in engine, the truck assigned to City Station 2 would greatly enhance
the level of truck service available to the unincorporated Del Aire and Lennox
communities, along with the District - served City of Hawthorne.
The following map shows the District's jurisdiction that is within 5 miles of El Segundo's
two fire stations. These areas highlighted in yellow will particularly benefit from the
additional service that would be available by annexing the City.
13 ��
I?I:ASII�II;ITI " S i "r1I) �' I'l�.R R VICES 7 O TI-II CITY017EL EGUNDO BV 77_JE
CO.N4OLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRIG "T Ca " I OS ANG L S COUNTY
District Areas within Five Miles of
El Segundo Stations
V ON,
1
t A 194
IVA-iD
Response Times
In most cases, the Fire District would respond from the same City stations or closer Fire
District stations on a "first -in" response. As a result, response times in the City would be
equal to or better than the existing response times, since some areas of the City may be
closer to an adjacent Fire District station.
Response times in the Fire District areas of unincorporated Del Aire would improve due
to the proximity of City Station 2, which would have first -in response jurisdiction in that
community.
Major or Simultaneous Incidents
The City has addressed the need to respond to large, complex, or simultaneous incidents
involving major loss of life or property through the use of automatic and mutual aid
agreements. While these agreements can provide significant resources, emergency
operations are less effective under these agreements than if City forces were an
established part of the Fire District and all responding resources were under a unified
command. Also, there is usually a dispatch "lag time" for automatic and mutual aid
requests, which causes longer response times for assisting units.
14
1��
FEA5,1 3ILITYSITIDVTOR SE RVICT'S WHIE C11YO E,r_ SE3'GUNDO BV-17Ir
CONSC)LIUAI_E-I) I�'II? ".E'ROTIs'C,'170N DISIWIC;Y OF OS ANG-1{LL',' COUNTY
Fire Ground and Emergency Operations
The fire service has recognized standards for the provision of fire and emergency
medical services. Some of these standards are dictated by federal or state regulations.
Tasks such as commanding and coordinating responding units, operating the fire
equipment, searching for and rescuing trapped persons, laying out and attacking the fire
with hoses, etc., must be done by an adequate number of properly trained and equipped
staff. All the tasks must be accomplished in rapid sequence within very limited and
critical time frames. Criteria such as "prior to flash over," "confinement to building of
origin," "prior to brain death," and "time to intervention" are applied.
The service configuration presented in this Feasibility Study, with supporting Fire District
resources, provides strengthened numbers of trained staff to quickly perform required
tasks and meet standards within the City.
Response Matrix
The Fire District's Command and Control Division, Dispatch Services Center, utilizes
standardized response profiles to dispatch resources to emergencies. Initial response for
a building fire is dependent on the required fire flow in gallons of water per minute
necessary to extinguish the fire. Following are a few examples of the Fire District's
typical response to reported fires:
Initial Commercial Response: The standard first alarm response for a commercial
building fire is:
Total average staffing level =
5 Engine Companies
2 Ladder Truck Companies
1 Paramedic Rescue Squad
2 Battalion Chiefs
29
If the initial response does not provide the necessary resources, greater alarms may be
requested by the incident commander.
Commercial Third Alarm: Response to a third alarm for a commercial building fire
would result in the following:
13 Engine Companies
6 Truck Companies
2 Paramedic Rescue Squads
1 Hazardous Materials Task Force (Engine & Squad)
1 USAR Task Force (Engine and USAR Squad)
1 Mobile Air Unit
6 Battalion Chiefs, 2 Assistant Chiefs, 1 Deputy Chief
Total average staffing level = 104
15 16
r IASrI�.rr;I:r k'S:T'LII)'FC)R .Srs'R VIC;'J;;S ;T C.� t Ill;' t;`r "' CiF Ilr'C. L /1vr�C� 1 Y THIS'
CON.SOLI.DAIISD FIRE Z' C)T�;'(;7 "a'C) .r l::r "1 IC "C" C)r LC).S.AIVC:I;'I S C "C)UNl YY
Refinery Third Alarm: 12 Engine Companies
3 Truck Companies
1 Paramedic Rescue Squad
2 Hazardous Materials Task Forces
1 USAR Task Force
1 Mobile Air Unit
1 Deluge Unit
1 Foam Unit
4 Battalion Chiefs, 2 Assistant Chiefs, 1 Deputy Fire Chief
Total average staffing level = 88
Additional resources, including various specialized pieces of equipment, technical
teams, etc., may be requested by the incident commander. When it is anticipated that an
engine company would be out for 30 minutes or more in designated critical coverage
areas, companies are automatically dispatched to "move -up" to pre- designated vacant
stations near the greater alarm incident so that coverage is available for any subsequent
emergency.
Paramedic Services
Sixty -seven (67) paramedic rescue squads are strategically assigned among the Fire
District's 169 fire stations. Paramedic rescue squad personnel provide advanced life
support, including drug therapy and sophisticated medical procedures, in addition to their
basic firefighting duties. In 2005, the Fire District instituted the 12 -Lead
Electrocardiogram (ECG) Program. The primary goal of this program is to improve
patient care and outcomes by immediately correlating the chief complaint, clinical
presentation, transport decision, and hospital intervention. The Fire District has the
capability of responding numerous additional squads to an incident or area when a high
demand for service occurs.
In appropriate locations, the Fire District operates paramedic engine companies and
paramedic assessment engines to increase the optimum use and efficiency of personnel.
Hazardous Materials Services
The Fire District provides hazardous materials response services to all of its jurisdictional
area and, upon request and availability, to cities outside the Fire District's jurisdiction.
Hazardous materials task force personnel (hazardous materials response squad and an
accompanying engine) are trained to identify and deal with a hazardous materials release
or potential release on emergency incidents.
Related Services
The Fire District conducts a variety of public service, educational, fire prevention, and
related programs such as: the Explorer Program which introduces young people ages 15
through 21 to the fire service as a possible career through training and participation in
actual situations; the Juvenile Fire Setters Program which provides youth counseling; the
16 11A 7
1ylASII3'II.,17 ".'t" S'I`1:rn.�Yli�alt Sr:li�'VIC;'I.�S TCa '1�II:l{' C, °I:r�C.aI�I�;r S11GLrNIa0.13� 1�11:I3
CONSOLIDATI-1) .1,.11X,,'1'1?OT ' C7[ ON.!) ISfI l[C'1'OFLf1SA.NG1I,IsSC.:OIJI lY
Rescue Youth Program, operated in conjunction with the District Attorney's Office,
which provides a mentoring program at District fire stations for at -risk youths that are
between 12 and 14 years of age; and the Yogi Bear Schoolhouse earthquake simulator,
which provides earthquake preparedness training.
The Fire District also provides ocean lifeguard, forestry, hazardous materials regulation,
and other health and safety related services. Lifeguard services are not included as part
of this feasibility study. The Fire District's current contract for lifeguard services along the
El Segundo beach area would not be impacted should the City transition to Fire District
services.
Patient Transport
The Fire District provides, without charge to patients, pre - hospital paramedic and
emergency medical services, including Advanced Life Support (ALS). The Fire District
does not provide ambulance transportation. Patients are transported to the hospital
utilizing private ambulance service under contract with the Department of Health
Services, using the exclusive operating area arrangement.
The City may opt to pursue a City -run transport program from City stations for which the
City could receive revenue. The Fire District would work with the City and the
Department of Health Services to determine the viability of this option for the City.
Regardless of whether the ambulance provider is private or City- sponsored, Fire District
fire fighter paramedics would accompany the patient in the ambulance if needed for
patient care. The private ambulance firm, or City, would charge the responsible private
party for transportation.
Fire Prevention
Fire District fire prevention and related services are provided by both the Prevention and
Operations Bureaus as follows:
• Building inspections for all commercial, industrial, high -rise, and multi - residential
occupancies.
• Fire prevention inspections in connection with the issuance of business licenses,
at the request of the City.
• Inspection of schools and institutional occupancies.
• Dwelling brush clearance inspections.
• Public education programs.
• Investigation of all fire hazard complaints, such as arson, from area residents.
• Review of all building plans, subdivisions, conditional use permits, zone changes
and water system improvement plans.
• Review of applications for filming and special effects permits, sets requirements
and conducts inspections at filming locations to ensure public safety and
compliance with the Fire Code.
17 i1$
I B V I S II'
A" Sl; T 11CIII 'I
G'C)NSOIJI)AT[ .I) I,IR ' 111'tC)`Ch'C'170N DI I IZIC;T C)T L05.A_NGIs'JJ_, S C "I71IN7Y
Move -Up Coverage
Fire District policy would require automatic engine company "move -up" coverage of any
designated critical coverage City station(s) when the jurisdictional engines are committed
to emergencies anticipated to least 30 minutes or more. Just as Fire District resources
outside the City would be used to move up and cover a designated City station(s), a
selected company in the City may be used to move up and cover stations outside the City
when necessary.
Automatic Aid
The Fire District utilizes automatic aid agreements with other fire departments to provide
the most expeditious response to designated areas on a day -to -day basis while
maintaining a reciprocal exchange of services. The Fire District would continue to
participate in the City's existing automatic aid agreements and mutual aid programs if the
City were to annex to the Fire District. Modifications would be made as appropriate.
Adjacent Fire District Resources
There are 14 Fire District fire stations, staffed daily with 72 firefighters that are within
5 miles of the City which would provide direct and support service under the regional
service delivery concept. Below is a chart listing all of the resources:
DISTRICT STATIONS AND RESOURCES WITHIN FIVE MILES OF
NEAREST CITY OF EL SEGUNDO BOUNDARY
District
Station
Number
Engine
Company
Quint/ Truck
Company
Paramedic
Rescue
Squad
Fire
Rescue
Boat
Post
Position
Staffing
Distance to
Nearest City
Boundary (Miles)
14
X (a)
X
6
4.85
18
X (a)
4
1.73
21
X
X
5
1.84
58
X
X
6
4.38
110
X (b)
X
X
9
4.81
158
X
X
5
4.94
159
X (b)
4
3.92
160
X
3
0.33
161
X
X
5
1.15
162
X
4
3.12
170
X (°)
X (`)
6
3.37
171
X
X
5
3.36
172
X
X
5
4.10
173
X
X
5
4.52
14
12
4
8
1
72
TOTAL UNITS
(a) Paramedic Unit
(b) Paramedic Assessment Unit
(`) Assessment Light Force
18
11;i
){'E isrl3r JTY S7VD.YFC %R ,5:ERVIC; S 7C) `I`fr1 C,'r: / ": ' (�F fs.r C CINI i(i RY TH
CONSOLIDATED FIRE PRO EC:r70N DISTRICT OF L OS ANGla.LES C'OUN7Y
In addition, the map below illustrates the resources that are currently assigned within five
miles of the City's borders:
Los Angeles County Fire Stations Within Five Miles
of the City of El Segundo
s3 I
Y
{
g t
Y! I
�� r - V 1 , v • S3' ' AV' +
tt iii
=
j
i
IIIANIA7 N86ACH�
AAI_
Dispatch and Communications
Dispatching for Fire District units in the City would be provided from the Fire District's Fire
Command and Control Facility located at 1320 North Eastern Avenue, Los Angeles. Fire
communications specialists staff the facility, all of whom are Emergency Medical
Dispatchers (EMDs). They are trained to provide lifesaving instructions over the phone
while persons are waiting for the arrival of emergency units.
If the City annexes to the Fire District, the "911" emergency reporting system would
remain in effect. A direct computer link and a direct telephone (ring -down) line or "speed
dial" system would be maintained between the South Bay Regional Public
Communications Authority (Authority), which is the City's PSAP (public safety answering
point) and the Fire District Fire Command and Control Facility.
All Fire District emergency vehicles contain mobile data terminals (MDTs) and automatic
vehicle locators (AVLs) for the most efficient communication and allocation of resources.
Command and other appropriate units use cellular phones in addition to radios.
19�t�
Eh�1 srr3rr.,�:r YSrLIU 'r ��x s c� vr+C "r .5 71() jj_1Y c,T:r'.Y C;►r+ r,:r; 4.F7 ,1]lvr)c) r3 :r ErrT
CON.50LIDA I,,D .I, R'I I'KO rI CII. i; N Co IJNT17
Coordination between City and Fire District
Recognizing that constant liaison is essential between the City and its fire department,
the area Assistant Fire Chief, who is located at Fire Station 164 in the neighboring City of
Hawthorne, along with his Community Service Representative, would maintain a
day -to -day working relationship with the City Manager and, through her /him, the City
Council. The Assistant Fire Chief would be responsible for representation at meetings
called by the City Clerk, meetings of the City Council, and other City staff meetings where
Fire District input is needed. The Assistant Fire Chief would act as the personal
representative of the Fire Chief of the Fire District on all daily operations between the City
and the Fire District.
Emergency Preparedness
Internal City emergency management, programs, and responsibilities would remain with
the City.
Public Education
Community and school education programs are provided as a Fire District service by
local fire stations, assisted by the regional Community Services Representatives.
Fire Cause and Arson Investigation
Fire cause determination services are provided by the Fire District. According to
established policy, either the engine company officer, Battalion Chief or, if necessary, the
Fire Investigation Unit conducts an initial investigation and establishes the cause of the
fire. Should the cause be determined to be arson, the Fire District's arson investigation
service would handle the investigation assisted by the City Police Department.
Hazardous Materials Programs
Were the City to annex to the Fire District, the Fire District could become the
administering agency for the City for the Hazardous Release Response Plan Inventory
Program and the Risk Management and Prevention Program. The Fire District would
collect all program - related fees as the administering agency. Fire District fee structure,
as required by law, is designed only to offset the costs of administering the program. It
would be necessary for the City to take the appropriate action necessary to transfer the
administrative responsibilities and make required notifications to the City's Certified
Unified Program Agency (CUPA) and the California Office of Emergency Services.
Should the City request to retain some aspects of the Hazardous Materials Health
Programs, the Fire District would work with City staff to determine the best way to
implement a dual run program for the El Segundo, which would be formalized in the
service agreement between the Fire District and the City.
20
FI;A Sl13IZ;1:I.1'.:I CII) '.I CJR ' ls'!fi �l( "Ii S R) 7I 7'
G()NSOI..IDA.:I 'Cs'D I ;7RIs PRO'rl,,'CI7C)N )IS7 illC "7" (1F.J_;C)SAN( %{L.I S COUNfl'
Hydrants
The Fire District would annually inspect all fire hydrants within the City to ensure that they
are mechanically operable and capable of delivering water in accordance with
standard Fire District policy. The Fire District would notify the City of El Segundo Water
Division, in writing, of any maintenance requirements as soon as possible after such
inspections and at any other time the Fire District becomes aware of maintenance or
repair requirements. The Fire District would maintain liaison with the City's Water
Division for water needs during emergencies and routine functions.
Additional District Services
See Appendix D for additional details regarding services provided by the Fire District.
21 �,�
F?FASIf3TI,17'1's`('LIDk'
C,O.NSOLIIUA1'1,;D h'J_J? s '1i0113C170N DI57IZ1. �;"��" CAF LOS ANGEL 4 C;OLIN`1 '
VII. TRANSITION FROM CITY TO DISTRICT
City Personnel
The California Health and Safety Code (Section 13861) and the California Government
Code (Sections 53292 and 55632) provide the legal authority for the Fire District to
furnish services to the City and to blanket in or appoint City Fire Department personnel to
Fire District status. Ultimately, the blanketing in of personnel is subject to joint agreement
between the City Council and the Board of Supervisors, the details of which would be
specified in an agreement for services.
Firefighting personnel with less than six months' service with the City at the time of
transfer to the Fire District, as well as trainees, reserves, auxiliaries, cadets, and fire
fighter apprentices, could not be brought in as Fire District employees. Positions and
salaries of all personnel blanketed in to the Fire District would be specified in the
agreement for services between the City and the Fire District. There would be no
reduction in salaries of City fire fighters blanketed in as Fire District fire fighter series
employees. Appointment of non - uniformed civilian or non - medically qualified fire fighters
for non - safety positions is subject to Fire District needs and negotiation and would require
a probationary term for any of these employees.
All personnel would be subject to a medical examination, drug screening, and an
appropriate personnel review prior to acceptance as Fire District employees. Those not
qualifying would remain the obligation of the City.
Personnel costs associated with annexation of the City to the Fire District including
transfer of any sick and /or vacation time as discussed below, would be defined during the
negotiation process.
Benefit Time
All employees blanketed into the Fire District would receive benefits now provided to Fire
District personnel. All time spent in rank as City /Fire District employees would be
considered for purposes of determining benefit accrual. Some of the prevailing benefits
and conditions are vacation time, holidays, sick leave, retirement plan, and group
insurance.
So that no employee is transferred to the Fire District without any available benefit time,
the City would be required to transfer to the Fire District for each employee, to the extent
the employee is entitled to such benefit time in City employment, a maximum of 20
vacation days, or 10 shifts, whichever is applicable, and 12 sick days, or 6 shifts,
whichever is applicable. City would reimburse the Fire District for transferred benefit time
at City salary rates. All remaining benefit time, such as vacation days, holidays, sick
leave, etc., accrued prior to the employee's transfer to the Fire District would remain as
obligations of the City. All City employees would be subject to the Hospital Insurance
Tax and any other applicable federal regulations.
22
1 44
l�'EAS.IBl1 ;17 "�'STi17)Y'1{C)Id SE.1�'VIC /;;� '1O �H17 (;III °YOV L SEGUNDO BY"THE'
CONSOLID7A IT'D FIRE 7'ROI L'CIIOtN.I)IS'rl?.ICI' ().[�' LOl ANCI.ELI:S COUNTY
CalPERS /LACERA Retirement
A sworn City employee transferring to the Fire District would become a LACERA member
on the first day of the month following the transfer of service to the Fire District.
CalPERS and LACERA retirement systems are reciprocal. A transferring City employee
would leave his or her retirement contributions on deposit with CalPERS and establish
reciprocity. The member's LACERA contribution rate would be based on his or her age
upon entering the earliest reciprocal system.
At the time of retirement, a reciprocal member would receive retirement benefits from
both agencies based on the benefits of reciprocity, such as adding service credit under
each system to determine eligibility to retire and using the highest earnings under either
system to calculate benefits from both. Service with CalPERS or other reciprocal system
is not used to determine the amount Los Angeles County contributes towards the
members' retiree health insurance premiums.
Probation
Any City employee on probation on the commencement date of service by the Fire
District would remain on probation until the Los Angeles County probation requirement
for the respective rank is met.
Promoted Positions
Current policy of the Fire District is to accept only as many officers and other promoted
personnel as there are positions created within the Fire District as a result of the City's
annexing to the Fire District. The City would be required to designate the following
number of promoted positions and the remaining firefighting members would be blanketed
in as fire fighters:
9 Captains
10 Fire Fighter Specialists / Engineers
All personnel designated for promoted positions must be duly qualified to hold those
positions. .
Seniority
The annexation of the City to the Fire District would create 37 additional Fire District
sworn positions; therefore, 37 uniformed personnel with the highest City Fire Department
seniority would receive seniority rights based on service time with the City Fire
Department. The remaining transferring employees would be assigned a seniority date
consistent with the effective date of transfer and placed on the Fire District's seniority list
in order of their relative service time with the City Fire Department. As those transferring
uniformed employees with full seniority status leave Fire District service, the other
23 1
YIlA41E3.II;I7 "I'S7`tIL)Y TOR S R'VCC:E TO T/ 1-h tall "YC�It is "L Si �rlN1aC) }3YTHE"
CONSOL.IDA1Z D f?I:12) 1'RC)'ItsC "I7C:)N C)IS:C "ItiC;'1 "C%C'Lt�SANG COUNTY
transferring uniformed employees would be assimilated into full seniority status based on
their total time in service as uniformed City /Fire District employees.
Employees would be eligible for promotional examinations within the Fire District without
regard to the normal six -month period applicable to new employees. All time
spent in rank as City /Fire District employees would be considered for purposes of
determining eligibility for promotional examination.
City Equipment
The City would transfer to the Fire District its interest, right, and title, which shall be free
and clear, in specified pieces of vehicular equipment which would be necessary for the
operation within the City by the Fire District. Major fire equipment or other equipment
essential to the operation of the vehicles or stations would also be transferred. All
vehicles and major equipment transferred would be specified in an agreement for
services negotiated by the City and the Fire District. Expendable equipment, tools,
fixtures, furnishings, supplies, and all items incidental to the operation of the Fire
Department would also be transferred but not specified. This includes all items currently
in possession or assigned to the City Fire Department unless specifically excluded.
The method by which any vehicles leased by the City would be transferred would be
addressed in an agreement for services. An agreement for services would also specify
the disposition of the equipment and vehicles transferred in the event the agreement is
terminated.
City Fire Department Facilities
If the City were to annex to the Fire District, the two existing City fire stations would be
occupied by the Fire District. The Fire District would lease the City fire stations for $1 per
year, per facility. For the first five years, fire station maintenance and minor repairs would
be the responsibility of the Fire District to the extent of $25,000 per station for the first
year, and would increase by 5% each year until the sixth year. All repairs in excess of
the Fire District's annual share would remain the responsibility of the City. Beginning the
sixth year, all fire station minor repairs and maintenance would be the responsibility of the
Fire District, and major repairs would be the responsibility of the City.
Landscape Maintenance
All routine maintenance of the landscaping at City Fire Stations would be performed by
Fire District fire station personnel.
Fuel Tanks
The Fire District would maintain and utilize the above - ground fuel pump located at Fire
Station 2. Costs to refuel Fire Department vehicles are included in the overhead
component of the proposed annual fee. The City would retain all responsibility for
previously removed and existing underground fuel tanks, fuel pumps, piping, etc., located
24 i�:J
[,f- A51BII.1TY"sTIIDY'r%OR ,5fSRv1C1'S TO TIM' (rTV 0F'EL SE rINDO ifVT1M'
O,ON.501,1DA7FC,D I ;IR1's PIt077s0;7 C(-)N.D1, 11?ICI' (). Lo ,S ANGI T L,S COUNTY
at the City fire stations occupied by the Fire District, including but not limited to any leaks,
soil contamination and /or necessary remediation as a result thereof.
Site Assessments
Prior to the commencement of services by the Fire District, the City would be required to
have performed an Electromagnetic Field Survey, a Phase I Site Assessment and
Building Asbestos Survey, and a Phase II Site Assessment, if subsequently required, for
the two proposed Fire District - staffed City fire stations. The site assessments would be
conducted by a Cal -OSHA registered environmental assessor who would determine if
asbestos, fuel, lead paint, or other environmental contaminants or hazards are present.
All site assessment reports would be reviewed by the Fire District and its environmental
services consultants to determine if pertinent standards have been met or if further
mitigation measures are required. The City would be required to mitigate and abate all
environmental hazards and provide evidence to the Fire District that all recommended
measures have been completed and that all applicable laws and requirements have been
complied with. Any residual contaminations discovered any time after Fire District
occupancy would be the responsibility of the City to abate.
All costs relating to Phase I and II site assessments and hazard abatement/mitigation
measures would be borne by the City.
Withdrawal from the Fire District
An annexation agreement entered into by the City and the Fire District would be for a
minimum term of ten (10) years. Should the agreement be terminated by either party
subsequent to the initial term, the distribution of assets would be determined as defined
in the agreement.
The Fire District would not be obligated to return to the City any item such as apparatus,
vehicles, furnishings, equipment, tools, or other personal property for which a monetary
or in -kind credit was given to the City.
25 1�U
r sASI73l1,r:r�Ysrrrta c c�rr EWVIc,E� O �x�ccr c c r c F r r., � Gzilv:r�c� r� �xc
C()NSC)IIrATr rRCM Iad JO C Lfv R c A.NC_';Er LS c,c)U.NT
VII. SUMMARY
Annexation of the City of El Segundo to the Fire District would result in the City becoming
an integral part of an organization that provides quality service to 58 cities and the
unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County through a regional fire protection system.
Under this regional concept, fire stations are strategically located throughout the service
area, ensuring the most efficient use of resources for response to alarms.
The existing City fire stations would be occupied by the Fire District. Daily, on -duty
staffing would total 12 in the City.
A total of 72 daily, on -duty staff, located within five (5) miles of the City's boundaries,
would also be immediately available for fire, hazardous materials, and medical
emergencies within the City.
Participation in the Fire District offers a means for the City to provide and maintain a very
high level of emergency services. It also affords the Fire District enhanced paramedic
and truck coverage to the unincorporated Del Aire community and may improve engine
company response times. Had the City been a part of the Fire District for the entire fiscal
year, the estimated 2010 -11 Annual Fee would have been $10.1 million.
The initial agreement term of any service agreement would be a minimum of ten (10)
years.
26 3 r
1,-1-,7AS1B11JrYS:r'rlD1".11-OR SE71?VrCES 110 rHL 617 "Y' 1)Fr.L EGUNDO i3Y THE
(;()N.S0I,f.13f17`E'11 t'C1Z.� i -IR )7E'C;�lIONDI,57'IZ.ICI'OFLO, ANC;I�If'SC;`C�LI.1Vl.V
APPENDIX
GLOSSARY
ALS Advanced Life Support including emergency care by a
certified paramedic (EMT -P)
ASSESSMENT ENGINES The staffing on a Paramedic Assessment Engine includes
one fire fighter paramedic. In addition to the care that
EMTs provide, an assessment engine can provide
advanced EMS care such as: heart monitoring and
interpretation of cardiac rhythms; manual defibrillation
and synchronized cardioversion; IV therapy; and
advanced pharmacology drug calculations and admin-
istration. A paramedic squad is dispatched simulta-
neously with an assessment engine to assist with patient
care and follow up at a receiving hospital, if necessary.
BLS Basic Life Support including emergency care provided by
an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT -1)
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, Board of
Directors of the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los
Angeles County.
CaIPERS California Public Employees Retirement System
CITY The City of El Segundo
CITY COUNCIL The City Council of the City of El Segundo
FIRE DISTRICT The Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles
County, also commonly referred to as the Los Angeles
County Fire Department
EMS Emergency Medical Services
EMT -1 Emergency Medical Technician 1 — personnel certified to
perform basic life support and first aid.
EMT -D Emergency Medical Technician D — personnel certified to
perform basic life support, first aid, and to operate an
automatic defibrillator. Currently, all engine and truck
companies carry automatic external defibrillators and their
personnel are certified at the Emergency Medical
Technician- Defibrillator (EMT -D) level.
27 3�
LITYS111DYFOR Slil? Vl("E'S "0 1 1`1__1 E (' I'll IV, OF EL SEG(INDOBY, 771E
FEASIBI pj?OTJTC77OND1S'1W1CTOF 110SANGELES COtW11Y
FIRE
CONSOLIDAYED
Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association
LACERA
LIGHT FORCE
A Light Force is comprised of a pumper engine and a ladder
six uniformed personnel, which
truck, staffed with a total of
respond together as a unit.
PARAMEDIC ENGINES
The staffing on Paramedic Engines includes two fire fighter
to the care that ElVlTs and
paramedics and, in addition
assessment engines can provide, can calculate and
administer controlled drugs. Paramedic engines also
maintain a disaster cache with medical inventory for
chemical and biological acts of terrorism. Paramedic
engines perform patient follow-up, if necessary, to a
receiving hospital. A paramedic squad is not dispatched
with a paramedic engine.
QUINT
A fire service apparatus that serves the dual purpose of a
truck and also functioning as a pumper, carrying a water
tank.
TRUCK
A fire service apparatus designed with ladder capabilities and
rescue tools such as the "jaws of life."
WILDLAND URBAN
Area where development and wildland fuels meet at a
INTERFACE
well defined boundary.
28
p,p,- A411311 :17 �'.STIIL7!' I " /Z 5:l'IiV1C : "I1" i 1 C) i h C 1 I ' C) s'f: SF.Y; i1NC)C)13.�' :1" Ifs
G „ZION �L5711IC C OF LOS ANGEEES COUNTY
C7NSC111fC1) I l?lPI711
APPENDIX B
DESCRIPTION OF CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
The Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County was established in 1949
and is a "special district” under California law. Pursuant to California Government Code
Section 55632, the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County, as the governing body
of the District, may contract with any other neighboring city, county or fire protection
district for the furnishing of fire protection to such other agency.
Population and Resources
The Fire District serves approximately 4.14 million people in 58 cities and all of the
unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County. The Fire District is a nationally recognized
fire department that provides a variety of high - quality emergency and
safety - related services.
The Fire District operates 169 fire stations with 163 staffed engine companies; 32 ladder
truck companies, which include 19 quints that have both pumper and ladder truck
features; 5 light forces, which are comprised of both an engine and truck company that
respond in tandem; 4 hazardous materials response squads; 2 urban search and rescue
task forces; 3 staffed paramedic air squads (with the capability of staffing an additional 7
air squads); and 67 paramedic rescue squads. In addition, numerous support services
and special pieces of equipment are utilized.
Organizational Structure
The Fire District's organizational structure is as follows:
Fire Chief
Executive Support
Planning Division
Chief Deputy
Emergency Operations
Compliance Office
Medical Director /
Employee Services Section
II Chief Deputy II
Business Operations
Professional
Technical Services Division Risk Management Division Employee Relations Division - Performance Section
East Administrative Prevention �peciai
North Central Sery ices Services Services
Regional Regional Regional
Operations Operations Operations Bureau Bureau Bureau
Bureau Bureau Bureau
)eputy Chief Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Deputy Chief
29
��V
fE�1SII3 .r1I:r'I',57`1JD1'IC),IZ'ERVIC 1"O 1711'Cra" 'OI L'1; 4I+ "C;zIN.rJCiI3T>.'i r1s
I S c �
CONSOLL)AI "I 1)1-'I1� pl?o7 : "C IION )I:5 r'1t,ICI" OF.L)4 ANGIs'Ll,N t "fir
For efficient management, the Fire District is divided into six functional bureaus, each
commanded by a Deputy Chief:
Central East and North Regional Operations Bureaus
The firefighting, hazardous materials emergency response, and emergency medical
forces of the Fire District are assigned into these three regional Operations Bureaus.
These forces are divided into nine field divisions, each under the command of an
Assistant Fire Chief. Each field division is composed of two to three battalions.
Each battalion is supervised 24 hours per day by a Battalion Chief. Six to twelve fire
stations make up a battalion. The Battalion Chief provides overall supervision and
administrative control of the stations and is the first line of management responsible
for dealing with union - represented employees.
An on -duty Fire Captain is assigned to each engine and truck company. The Fire
Captain supervises the station and is responsible for the fire prevention and
suppression, emergency medical, and other emergency and routine services that are
provided within the station's jurisdictional area.
The City of El Segundo would be included in the Central Regional Operations Bureau.
The Deputy Fire Chief in command of the Central Regional Operations Bureau is
located at Fire Station 171 in the City of Inglewood. The local Assistant Fire Chief is
located at Fire Station 164 in the City of Hawthorne.
Prevention Services Bureau
Comprised of the Prevention, Health /Hazardous Materials, and Forestry
Divisions.
Special Services Bureau
Comprised of the Command and Control, Fire Fleet Services, Construction and
Maintenance, and Information Management Divisions.
Administrative Services Bureau
Comprised of the Human Resources, Financial Management, Organizational
Development, and Materials Management Divisions.
30 ;� i
, ASjBjLr7 "ySillD YFOR SIs "_RVIC ES` 'T'd") Is (1 "['Y0F_EL S% GUNS. O BY 71HE
CONSO.L.IDAT "E D.F11 I'IZ0:I'Xi "f'j70_N 1),IS`IIZ /C7`0FLOSANGE'Lb, "S C;`OUN74"
APPENDIX C
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT SERVICES
Training
The Fire District operates four regional training centers. A newly hired Fire District
employee is given 17 weeks of intense training at the Fire District's training centers. Our
training system is designed to ensure that only highly trained firefighting personnel are
available for all emergency and non - emergency duties. In addition to basic firefighting
skills, the recruit fire fighter is trained for medical emergencies and is certified as an EMT -
1 and EMT -D. For one year after graduation, the employee is on probation and is rated
monthly on training progress. The probationary fire fighter receives daily drills and must
pass a final examination before being approved for permanent employment.
Ongoing training for all personnel is accomplished by mandatory, daily, two -hour drills.
Personnel are continually introduced to new or improved emergency and non -
emergency procedures.
City firefighting personnel assimilated into the Fire District, if not already certified, would
receive EMT -1 and EMT -D training and certification, and Class "B" commercial driver's
training and licensing as required by the Department of Motor Vehicles. Those personnel
would also receive various other orientations and training for their specific positions in the
Fire District.
Technical Expertise
The District is a progressive leader in the fire service. It is comprised of many individuals
and groups with specialized skills and equipment who provide a high degree of efficiency
and cost - effectiveness for both routine and emergency functions. Although District urban
search and rescue, hazardous materials squads and helicopter operations receive much
publicity, the District's scope of expertise and specialization is wide and varied. A few
examples follow:
Arson investigators are full -time professionals.
• Specially trained members of the Joint Regional Intelligence Center (JRIC)
Terrorism Early Warning Group (TEW) which is comprised of personnel from
other agencies such as the Sheriff's Department, L. A. City Fire Department,
L. A. City Police Department, Department of Health Services, FBI, the Rand
Corp., and others.
• Six OES /FEMA certified urban search and rescue dogs and one ATF certified
arson dog.
Swift water rescue teams.
31 ��
1?I ASI13Cl;rTY'S:C "CIZ71 " "1l)!? �s "X VCC 1.'. i()' JCI; TTO XsL SEGi1TVOO B YTHIs
G' )NSo.Z,II)�i:II .T� 1?1Ct.i� p1?OJ 1C,`C "fON )I TR C;T O OSANCrE EN CC)Cll IT
Fire prevention staff are specialized and develop in -depth knowledge in
particular areas. These areas include:
Schools and Institutions — Conducts inspections of schools and institutional
type buildings.
Area Offices — Inspections include new construction, tenant improvement, large
occupancies, public assemblies, some of the smaller projects and tenant
improvement plan checks.
Petroleum and Chemical Unit — Conducts inspections of refineries, large
chemical plants, etc.
_Arson/Fire Investigation Unit — Conducts arson investigations and cause
determination investigations.
Engineering /Plan Check Section — Reviews all new construction /large tenant
improvement plans for Fire Code requirements.
Health /Hazardous Materials Division — Handles hazardous materials
disclosure.
• A full -time, professionally equipped video unit produces quality and effective
audio and visual training materials.
• Special committees provide procedures and training for railroad incidents, truck
operations, wildland pre- attack, fire prevention and other specialized areas.
• Experienced administrative paramedics or the District's Emergency
Physician /Medical Director coordinate multi - casualty medical procedures.
• A full -time, licensed breathing apparatus technician and experienced, trained
assistants repair and maintain breathing apparatus.
• Registered nurse /professional educators coordinate EMT training.
• The Information Management Division,
provides computer support to the field,
Control Division (dispatching).
with approximately 49 skilled technicians,
administration, and the Command and
• The District's 53 fire shop and field mechanics maintain the District's apparatus
for maximum use and efficiency.
• A state -of- the -art, computerized Command and Control Center dispatches and
32 ;�
'1)x � " C)I .Ir StC
CI J. -j I I
G'ONSL7LIDAI I %:I7 --' 1'IZC)77 C; I'IC�N I,S rRIC;T O I,CISANC T LLS C;C)LINC "I'
manages the closest available resources on an incident. All first responder units
are equipped with an automatic vehicle locator device (AVL) that sends real time
data reflecting the location of each unit, unit type, and current rate of travel.
Dispatching and command staff see exactly where resources are at any time so
that units can be moved or repositioned, if necessary, to optimize the use of
emergency first responders based upon their actual location.
Following are examples of the District's specialized emergency apparatus and units:
Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) Task Forces — Comprised of a USAR Squad and a
USAR Engine, these two units combine to form a USAR Task Force that are specially
trained to respond to technical rescues, collapsed structures, trench rescues, confined
space rescues, swift water rescues, cliff rescues, major vehicle accidents with
entrapment, and structure fires.
Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Task Forces — Comprised of a Hazardous
Materials Squad and Engine, these two units are staffed with firefighters who are
specially trained to provide immediate response to hazardous chemical emergencies and
collapse incidents and provide additional personnel for major emergencies.
Water Tenders — Provide water if hydrants fail.
Metropolitan Incident Resource Vehicle (MIRY) — A vehicle designed to convey
supplies and equipment to support a multi- casualty mass decontamination operation.
Tractors — Transport bulldozers and search and rescue trailers to incident sites.
Rehabilitation and Food Trucks — Assist fire fighters working on incidents for
extended times.
Bulldozers — Dike off hazardous materials flows or flood waters, assist in rescue
efforts, fire overhaul, and wildland firefighting.
Light Units — Provide lighting and electricity for effective nighttime operations.
Brush Patrol Trucks — Provide jurisdiction patrolling and immediate extinguishment of
small fires in the urban interface areas.
Foam Units — Provide special types of foam application for chemical and petroleum fires.
These are separate from foam units carried on engine companies.
Mobile Air Units — Provide on -scene refill of breathing apparatus to enable continuous
firefighting operations.
Mobile Command and Communication Centers — Allow on -site communication and
33 i J
-()I? SEI? VIcI � I I :) EJ SEGUNDOBY7YIE'
_S' IE CTI V( F ,
TO /'I t, ,s cOONTY
FE
MJTV'STIJDy 1,
CONSOLIDA TED PIRE PROTTXRON DISIWICI'01' L()SANGE _t�
coordination of resources at major incidents such as floods, earthquakes, explosions,
large industrial or life loss incidents.
Helicopters, — Provide paramedic treatment and transport in life-threatening situations as
well as fire suppression water-dropping capabilities and air reconnaissance for major
disasters, The District has 9 helicopters which includes 3 Firehawks with a water
capacity of 1,000 gallons, and 6 Bell 412's.
Emergency Support Teams (ESTs) — Strategically located two-person units provide
first-alarm firefighting support to specific areas in the District to augment firefighting
staffing.
Deluge Units — Provide very large water streams for effective application and
knockdown of large industrial fires.
While the resources listed above are representative of the specialized capabilities of the
District, application of these specialized resources in addition to the economy of scale the
District enjoys leads to the high quality and wide variety of service the District offers the
city.
.�
34 .1 35
O m
T
m
D i
77
O o n
p0
�. Z
n
T
u
n
D
C D
n Z
u
m
� v O
fTi
O
m
w
o a
m
o
0
r D
3
C
m
n 3 O -
�! Oi
O
w
w� w3
o
9.3
�'o
c°
DODO
3 zZ
ti
Q D
a
F
Qm vw�
w 3 m c
w
.m
°'
w' n
mo mD
ID
. »�m
30
-°
m
an
£ w y m
o w
w
a -
m
a_ O
° w
N N
N
n
3
m
J J J J m m m N m UI A W w N
, - , - , , - - ,
-' '� O
(D
N fall
O C I
a)
2.-
O w
D
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m W N� W N� w N� (n N O N O
fp m J m m A N� cp m m A
W6
N
N N
a
1p � D
ID
w 3 p c m
n
o w
rn
pmmm :rmC>��mZ0>, Om�a
<OD�90t➢i�c➢il�9m
m
m
wa
''-o ^� rn
w
w
CXXmpDOODD C) T(n
MZ mM -6 m � D'I N �DODm
K> D K900K cn0 rZ
m OC V V �-mi C)mmm
N n
3
M. N
�'
((n 131 F
0O 000mm -I Kn MEl CrN ?N
y1OQD (�> pO�G1nD
-
Ox
(^
w
m
N w n'N
N Q
W
N
m D y 031 <m0 CM33 mm
D In mF m(nZ -i31D vZzZ
m -ID (n
Znz --{I
-ml c:
�r ;z GD9 f<n
N m
Sao.
j
n o
rNC
m m m u m m 7m1 -iD-I 9'�p p
< < Op
w _I� Z Z Z �-mi:0 Z
o
W
o
viK'O y
N
O c
N
-1 -i _ m C
m C) m 37zvD V mm m-zi m<m Fn
CCCmm(^
m
NaNmmm�Cnm{
Oo m
C
❑
CL
mCC(n Z -V
it
D
m_i �(np00D77C C
N
�N Np
N
O
O
�TmDmm^�pppZ V Zvi
9
-Z�(M(1;;�C -Dlpp
m
o 0 0 �w
`<
m O
°'
o
m C C C Z m n
(nzzOD m m�m�
n^� z �� z 0
C -Ipp>0z
o
�,
w w N w a
ro
v
o
-�ppm< z new
mz
mzzm z
0Z9 n
w
o c
m o a m
w
m
O p z � p
`L m 0
as '^ 3 CD m 3
m m � Z+ 'l
0 D
�. m o
vi
m
7J O Z C
z (n
<o<
w0
C) Z
0 m
o
O
m e a
w'
m
y
O j
C
N
w
? O
v
O n
➢ =1
N
N
� c
w
�
W w
wrote
m.
z
w�+
wiv(n m,cmo
W W N (m0 N m N A
m
W O Oho A A
L7
m
m A A (NO O
m w' A
D
to
0
J
O
O
O
O
m
A
A
rTm
°
°
°
N
2
2
2
N
N
C
C
C
m
m
m
z
c
m
m
m
m
z
z
0
U)
O
i
m
0
a
x
°
m
m
a
m
m
I
O
9
i
N
J
OD
A
D
m
O
D
m
0
O
D
r
ch
O
n
c
c
1
J
N
O
0
m
c�
N
m
n
N
D
7J
D
1O
m
O r
D N
r m
in G)
PC
<Z
O
CO
z
p
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER
7/23/10 THROUGH 8/05110
Date
Payee
Amount
Description
7/23/2010
State of CA EFT
1,891.15
Child support payment
7/23/2010
Nationwide EFT
71,374.34
EFT 457 payment
7/23/2010
UB
4,295.65
PARS payment
7/23/2010
Manufacturers & Traders
33,217.56
457 payment Vantagepoint
7/23/2010
Health Comp
2,881.74
Weekly claims
7/28/2010
Health Comp
2,800.83
Weekly claims
7/28/2010
Lane Donovan Golf Ptr
18,979.27
Payroll Transfer
7/29/2010
Unum
497.80
LTD
7/30/2010
Cal Pers
313,245.11
Retirement
7/30/2010
Wells Fargo
407,067.70
Infrastructure semi annual payment
7/30/2010
ICRMA
846,086.00
Workers Comp & Liability Insurance
8/4/2010
Health Comp
4,695.10
Weekly claims
8/5/2010
Cal Pers
413,052.52
Health
8/5/2010
Employment Development
4,852.00
State Taxes
8/5/2010
Employment Development
58,051.99
State Taxes
8/5/2010
IRS
254,984.39
Federal Taxes
7/23 - 8/5/10
Workers Comp Activity
32,901.64
SCRMA checks issued
2,470,874.79
DATE OF RATIFICATION: 8/17/10
TOTAL PAYMENTS
BY WIRE:
2,470,874.79
Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by:
8/(. l ro
Dep ty City Treasurer Date
81/0 Ja
Director of inance, 4 / Date
City Man Date
Informatics on actual enditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo.
P: \City Treasurer \Wire Transfers\2010 \wire 2010 3rd Qtr \Wire Transfers 8- 05.xls A.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 3, 2010 — 5:00 P.M.
5:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER — Mayor Busch at 5:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Busch
Mayor Pro Tern Fisher
- Present
- Present — arrived at 5:05 p.m.
Council Member Brann
- Present
Council Member Fuentes
- Present
Council Member Jacobson
- Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per
person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to
communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on
behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City
Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250.
Mark Hensley, City Attorney, stated that Government Code §54956.9(b) items were
deleted from agenda before Council entered closed session.
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
CLOSED SESSION:
The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the
Brown Act (Government Code Section §54960, et seq.) for the purposes of conferring
with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on
potential and /or existing litigation; and /or discussing matters covered under Government
Code Section §54957 (Personnel); and /or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators;
as follows:
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code
§54956.9(a) -3- matter
City of El Segundo vs. City of Los Angeles, et. al. LASC Case No. BS094279
NSA Construction Group, Inc. vs. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. BC438182
Catbird Plumbing & Construction, Inc. v. Gonzales Construction, Inc. LASC Case No.
BC440589.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 3, 2010
PAGE NO. 1
I +I 6
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(b): -2-
potential case (no further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation
pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(c): -0- matter.
APPOINTMENT AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEE (Gov't.
Code § 54957) -0- matter
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54957.6): -1-
matters
Represented Group: Police Support Services Employees Association (PSSEA), City
Employees Association (CEA), Firefighters Association (FFA), Police Managers
Association (PMA), Police Officers Association (POA), Supervisory and Professional
Employees (S &P)
Negotiators: Jack Wayt and Bob Hyland
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8): -2-
matters
City Property: 2161 El Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo (Fire Station No. 2)
City Negotiators: City Manager, Assistant City Manager
Negotiating Party: Wiseburn School District
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms (potential lease or sale)
City Property: APN #4155 - 614 -900 (Storm Water Detention Basin)
City Negotiators: City Manager
Negotiating Party: El Segundo Unified School District
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms (potential lease or sale)
Council recessed at 6:50 p.m.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEET, ING
PAGE NO. 2
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 3, 2010 - 7:00 P.M.
7:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER — Mayor Busch at 7:00 p.m.
INVOCATION — Pastor Scott Lambert, Hilltop Christian Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Council Member Suzanne Fuentes
PRESENTATIONS
a. Council Member Fuentes presented a Proclamation announcing August 7 and 8,
2010, St. Anthony School Golden Jubilee Week.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Busch
- Present
Mayor Pro Tem Fisher
- Present
Council Member Brann
- Present
Council Member Fuentes
- Present
Council Member Jacobson
- Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per
person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to
communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on
behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City
Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250.
While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action
on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after Public
Communications is closed.
George Hoops, Resident; spoke regarding local residents paying for trash service and
property tax.
Loretta Frye, Resident; spoke regarding the water rate increase. Also spoke to the
difficulty that seniors will have filing proof of income to qualify for the low income water
billing.
Pete Charland, Resident spoke in opposition to the County assuming control of the El
Segundo Fire Department.
Peggy Tyrell, Resident; spoke in opposition to the County assuming control of the El
Segundo Fire Department, and the circulation of a petition by the Firefighters
Association.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 3, 2010
PAGE NO. 3
Scott Houston, Resident; spoke in favor of placing a TOT and UUT increase on the
November ballot.
Jane Friedkin, Resident; spoke regarding council's lack of response to citizens and City
Hall's automated phone answering system.
Mark Renner, Resident; spoke in opposition to the County assuming control of the El
Segundo Fire Department and City salaries /retirements.
Liz Garnholtz, Resident; spoke in opposition to the County assuming control of the Fire
Department. She also spoke regarding the CalPers financial commitment and the
budget.
Toni Raynor, Continental Development; spoke regarding the Fire prevention process
and the possibility that the service may be diminished with the County.
Ron Swanson, Resident; spoke regarding the City budget and declining economy and
the proposed election regarding the tax increases. He feels the employees, residents
and businesses need to walk hand in hand to bridge the budget deficit.
Marsha Hanson, Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce; addressed the
Chamber's concerns regarding the proposed UUT and TOT increases. The Chamber
urges Council to find new spending reductions.
Joe Hardy, Hacienda Hotel; spoke against the proposed TOT increase.
Lilly Craig, Chevron; spoke regarding the UUT proposal, and stated that slowly
increasing taxes on the business community was not the solution to the budget deficit.
Jim Hart, Northrup Grumun; spoke regarding the proposed tax increases on the
business community as the solution to the budget deficit.
Mike Robbins, Resident; spoke against raising any taxes, and employee compensation.
Gary Wallace; Resident; spoke against the Fire Department being taken over by the
County.
City Attorney Mark Hensley announced that based upon the fact that meetings with the
following labor unions did not produce the desired 5% cost savings, the City will initiate
layoff process for the following unions: Police Support Services Association, City
Employee Association, Police Officer's Association, and the Supervisory and
Professional Association.
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 3, 2010
PAGE NO. 4
1��,1
Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda
by title only.
MOTION by Council Member Brann, SECOND by Council Member Jacobson to read all
ordinances and resolutions on the agenda by title only. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS (PUBLIC HEARING)
Consideration and possible action (Public Hearing) regarding the introduction
and first reading of an Ordinance approving Environmental Assessment EA No.
863 and Zone Text Amendment ZTA 10 -03 to amend the C -4 (Commercial
Center) Zone to allow: 1) medical and dental offices, not to exceed 5,000 square
feet as permitted uses, and 2) automobile sales and service centers, not to
exceed 70,000 square feet as a conditionally permitted use; and adopting
Development Agreement No. 10 -01 (Fourth Amendment to Development
Agreement No.03 -01 with Rosecrans - Sepulveda Partners, 2, LLC and PES
Partners, LLC for EA 631) for the Plaza El Segundo development project located
at 710 -860 South Sepulveda Boulevard, 700 -740 Allied Way, and 2003 -2015
East Park Place to allow the following uses: 1) a certified Farmer's Market to
operate one day per week; 2) Medical and Dental Offices, not to exceed a total of
5,000 square feet of floor area; and 3) an Automobile Sales and Service Center,
not to exceed 70,000 square feet; and to allow the entire Plaza El Segundo
Development (Phase 1) to be considered as a single parcel for the purpose of
meeting the El Segundo Municipal Code minimum parking requirements and to
eliminate the requirement for individual parcels to have parking covenants
recorded to transfer parking between parcels within the Phase 1 Development.
Applicant: PES Partners, LLC. (Fiscal Impact: None).
Mayor Busch stated that this was the time and place to conduct a public hearing
regarding the introduction and first reading of an Ordinance approving Environmental
Assessment EA No. 863 and Zone Text Amendment ZTA 10 -03 to amend the C -4
(Commercial Center) Zone to allow: 1) medical and dental offices, not to exceed 5,000
square feet as permitted uses, and 2) automobile sales and service centers, not to
exceed 70,000 square feet as a conditionally permitted use; and adopting Development
Agreement No. 10 -01 (Fourth Amendment to Development Agreement No.03 -01 with
Rosecrans- Sepulveda Partners, 2, LLC and PES Partners, LLC for EA 631) for the
Plaza El Segundo development project located at 710 -860 South Sepulveda Boulevard,
700 -740 Allied Way, and 2003 -2015 East Park Place to allow the following uses: 1) a
certified Farmer's Market to operate one day per week; 2) Medical and Dental Offices,
not to exceed a total of 5,000 square feet of floor area; and 3) an Automobile Sales and
Service Center, not to exceed 70,000 square feet; and to allow the entire Plaza El
Segundo Development (Phase 1) to be considered as a single parcel for the purpose of
meeting the El Segundo Municipal Code minimum parking requirements and to
eliminate the requirement for individual parcels to have parking covenants recorded to
transfer parking between parcels within the Phase 1 Development. Applicant: PES
Partners, LLC.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 3, 2010
PAGE NO. 5
Clerk Mortesen stated that proper notice had been given in a timely manner and that no
communications had been received in the City Clerk's Office.
Greg Carpenter, Planning and Building Safety Director, gave a report.
Dan Crofts stated he was available to respond to any questions.
Liz Garnholtz, Resident; spoke regarding parcel taxes.
MOTION by Council Member Jacobson, SECONDED by Mayor Pro Tern Fisher to close
the public hearing. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
Mark Hensley, City Attorney, read by title only:
ORDINANCE NO. 1446
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SSEPUDEVELOPMENT
LVEDA P 2EN LLCGRANDENROSEOCRANS-
BETWEEN ROSECRAN
SEPULVEDA 3, LLC (PES PARTNERS, LLC), AND THE CITY OF EL
SEGUNDO AFFECTING THE PLAZA EL SEGUNDO DEVELOPMENT, AND
AMENDING EL SEGUNDO MUNICIPAL CODE ( "ESMC ") C -4 (COMMERCIAL
CENTER) ZONE REGULATIONS,
Council Member Brann introduced Ordinance No. 1446. Second reading and adoption
of the Ordinance scheduled for August 17, 2010.
2. Consideration and possible action to open a Public Hearing, consider testimony,
and adopt a Resolution finding that the City conforms with the annual Congestion
Management Program (CMP) and adopting the annual CMP Local Development
Report, in accordance with California Government Code § 65089. (Fiscal Impact:
None)
Mayor Busch stated that this was the time and place to conduct a public hearing
regarding testimony, and adopt a Resolution finding that the City conforms with the
annual Congestion Management Program (CMP) and adopting the annual CMP Local
Development Report, in accordance with California Government Code § 65089.
Clerk Mortesen stated that proper notice had been given in a timely manner and that no
communications had been received in the City Clerk's Office.
Greg Carpenter, Planning and Building Safety Director, gave a report.
MOTION by Council Member Jacobson, SECONDED by Mayor Pro Tern Fisher to close
the public hearing. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
Mark Hensley, City Attorney, read by title only:
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 3, 2010
PAGE NO. 6
143
RESOLUTION NO. 4672
A RESOLUTION FINDING THE CITY
PROGRAMN(CMP) COMPLIANCE
AND ADOPTING THE
CONGESTION MANAGEM ENT
LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE §
65089.
MOTION by Mayor Pro Tern Fisher, Busch
5 /0 to adopt Resolution
No. 4672. MOTION PASSED B Y UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
3. Consideration and possible action to (1) call for a special election on November
2, 2010; (2) place an initiative on the ballot to amend and increase by 2% the
City's utility user tax ( "UUT "); (3) place an initiative on the ballot to amend and
increase by 2% the City's transient occupancy tax ( "TOT "); and (4) take such
additional, related, action that may be desirable. Fiscal Impact: Projected
approximate annual revenue increase of $3,948,000 from the UUT and annual
revenue increase of $964,000 from the TOT.
RESOLUTION NO. 4668
A RESOLUTION PLACING AN INITIATIVE ON THE NOVEMBER 2, 2010
BALLOT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIC, SECTION 2(B) OF THE
CALIFORNIA CTAXATION CODE EECTION D 3724 SECTION
RVENUT & 53724(C) REGARDING
UTILITY USER TAXES.
MOTION by Mayor Pro Tern Fisher, SECONDED by Council Member Fuentes to
adopt Resolution No. 4668. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE.
5/0
RESOLUTION NO. 4669
A RESOLUTON CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 2,
2010 PURSUANT TO ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 9222 AND 10403
MOTION by Mayor Pro Tern Fisher, SECONDED by Council Member Fuentes to
adopt Resolution No. 4669. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE.
5/0
RESOLUTION NO. 4671
A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF THE BALLOT MESURE REGARDING THE
EL SEGUNDO UTILITY USERS TAX
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 3, 2010
PAGE NO
1 � `f
MOTION by Mayor Busch, opt
Resolution No. 4671. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE 5/0
RESOLUTION NO. 4670
A RESOLUTION E WITHLTHE CITY CLERK BESNCLO BALLOT
ARGUMENTS FILED INCLUDED WITH
VOTER INFORMATION FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 2,
2010
MOTION by Mayor Busch, SECONDED by Mayor Pro Tern Fisher to adopt
Resolution No.4670. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
4. Continuation of Council's consideration to transition the El Segundo Fire
Department's ( "ESFD ") services to the Consolidated Fire Protection District of
Los Angeles County (aka the Los Angeles County Fire Department), including
possible action to direct staff to undertake further analysis of potential impacts
including, without limitation, an analysis pursuant to Elections Code § 9212
regarding an initiative petition currently being circulated that would require, if
adopted, that ESFD's services be performed by the County.
Continue to August 17, 2010.
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed
unanimously. If a call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered
individually under the next heading of business.
5. Approved Warrant Numbers 2578242 to 2578444 on Register No. 20 in the total
amount of $773,347.03 and Wire Transfers from 7/09/10 through 07/22/10 in the
total amount of $2,425,320.67.Authorized staff to release. Ratified: Payroll and
Employee Benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or agreement;
emergency disbursements and /or adjustments; and wire transfers.
6. Approved Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of July 20, 2010.
7. Approved Agreement No. 4082 with the City of Hawthorne to implement and
maintain server -based Records Management System and related software
applications developed by Tiburon Inc. (Fiscal Impact: One time costs not to
exceed $235,000 from the already approved one -time start up cost of
$517,500.00; $90,000 for annual contractual maintenance costs). Authorized the
City Manager to execute an Agreement with the City of Hawthorne to implement
and maintain server -based Records Management System and related software
applications.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 3, 2010
PAGE NO. 81 _
1 L1 0
8. Approved request for the El Segundo Police Department to accept and expend
one -time grant funds from h ania O ce of $ O)
Enforcement and Awarene ss Prog ramFaImpact 15,84 OOfrom OTS
Grant Fund)
9. PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCIL MEMBER JACOBSON.
10. PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCIL MEMBER FUENTES.
11. Approved request from Mattel, Inc. to allow two temporary five hundred four
(504) square -foot "Special Event Signs" on the south side of the parking structure
located at 333 Continental Boulevard. Applicant: Mattel, Inc. for a period of sixty
five (65) days beginning August 24, 2010 and ending October 27, 2010. (Fiscal
Impact: None)
12. Adopted Resolution No. 4673 setting a public hearing on September 7, 2010 for
Council consideration of a franchise agreement with Golden State Water
Company to distribute potable water in the City of El Segundo. (Fiscal Impact:
2% of gross annual receipt of Applicant arising from the use, operation or
possession of the franchise.)
MOTION by Council Member Jacobson, SECONDED by Mayor Pro Tern Fisher to
approve Consent Agenda Items 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, and 12 (as amended). MOTION
PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA
9. Consideration and possible action to receive and file report without objecting to a
new Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license for on -site sale and off -site
consumption of alcohol at an existing convenient store located at 601 North
Sepulveda Boulevard. Applicant: Veronica Becerra (Fiscal Impact: N /A)
MOTION by Council Member Jacobson, SECONDED by Brann, to request the ABC
deny a new Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license for on -site sale and off -site
consumption of alcohol at tl BY convenient store
FOLLOWING located
V0 CE VOTEepAYES
Boulevard. MOTION PASSED
JACOBSON, FUENTES, BRANN. NOES: BUSCH, FISHER. 3/2
10. Adopt Ordinance No. 1444 approving Environmental Assessment EA 755 and
Zone Text Amendment ZTA 07 -02 to amend the El Segundo Municipal Code
( "ESMC ") off - street parking and loading regulations (Fiscal Impact: N /A)
MOTION by Council Member Fuentes, SECONDED by Mayor Busch to adopt
Ordinance No. 1444 approving Environmental Assessment EA 755 and Zone Text
Amendment ZTA 07 -02 to amend the El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC ") off - street
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEET, INN
PAGE NO. 9
I�iJ
parking and loading regulations. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE.
5/0
F. NEW BUSINESS
REPORTS — CITY MANAGER - NONE
REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY - NONE
REPORTS — CITY CLERK - NONE
REPORTS — CITY TREASURER — Reported he would be on vacation for the next
Council meeting.
REPORTS — CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member Fuentes — spoke on Broadway in the Park and St. Anthony's reunion
celebration.
Council Member Brann — spoke on Broadway in the Park, Cable TV, and spotlight on El
Segundo segment.
Council Member Jacobson —
13. Consideration and possible action regarding Business License Tax
Recommendation — This item serves as a place holder. Currently meeting with
businesses on this matter.
No action or discussion taken.
Spoke regarding Broadway in the Park, and requested that the Council Salaries and
benefits be posted on the City website.
Mayor Pro Tern Fisher — NONE
Mayor Busch — Spoke regarding El Segundo Night at Dodger Stadium; announced the
El Segundo Little League 12 year old All Star team accomplishments.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per
person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have receive value of $50 or more to
communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on
behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City
Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250.
While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action
on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after Public
Communications is closed.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 3, 2010
PAGE NO. 10
l� 1
Mike Robbins, Resident; requested that the City employees compensation and benefits
also be posted on the City web site.
Peggy Tyrell, Resident; spoke regarding the petition circulated by the Firefighter's
Association.
Jane Friedkin, Resident; spoke regarding Council Member Brann's comments on
residential fees.
Mark Renner, Resident; spoke regarding the proposed layoffs and employee salaries.
Elizabeth Waase, Resident; spoke regarding the El Segundo Fire Department services
and the CERT program.
MEMORIALS — NONE
CLOSED SESSION - NONE
ADJOURNMENT at 10:11 P.M.
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEET, INN
PAGE NO. 11
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
. - --n A cm A W MF.NT
MEETING DATE: August 17, 2010
AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action to approve a five -year bulk rate agreement between the
City and Time Warner for cable television services to the residents of Park Vista. (Fiscal
Impact: None)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Authorize the City Manager to execute a five -year bulk rate agreement between the
City and Time Warner;
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
None
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Amount Budgeted: $
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s):
ORIGINATED BY: Alison Fiorini, Recreation Supervisor If f
REVIEWED BY: Bob Cummings, Recreatioarks Director
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
In June 2002, the Housing Corporation entered into a bulk rate billing agreement with Time
Warner to provide cable television services to the residents of Park Vista. That agreement has
since expired and a replacement agreement is required. Under a bulk rate agreement, the need for
individual billing to residents is avoided and, instead, the Housing Corporation is billed a bulk
rate each month. The rate represents a substantial discount of nearly 50% off of the standard
retail rates for the same services. The cost of cable television services is factored into the rental
rate for each unit.
Currently, the total monthly cost for providing cable services to all 97 units is approximately
$2,444.00, which translates to approximately $25.20 per unit. The new agreement factors in a
small increase in service fees, bringing the new monthly total to approximately $2,764.50, or
$28.50 per unit. The term of the new agreement
a 5% years
annual increase. in for the first ed
two years. After that, the agreement provides maximum
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 17, 2010
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding authorizing the recording of the Notice of
Completion and authorizing the City Manager to accept completion of work for 26 homes related
to the City's Residential Sound Insulation Program's Group 38 (Project No. RSI 09 -19).
(Final Contract Amount: $746,207.09)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Authorize the City Clerk to file the City's Planning and Building Safety Director's Notice of
Completion in the County Recorder's Office;
2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to close out Project No. RSI 09 -19; and /or
3. Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
List of homes included in Groups 38
Planning and Building Safety Director's Notice of Completion
FISCAL IMPACT: Included in Adopted Budget
Amounts Budgeted: $782,980
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s): 116 - 400 - 0000 -8960
ORIGINATED BY: James S. O'Neill, Program Manager rnd REVIEWED BY: Gre Carpenter, Director o ann' uilding Safety
Greg
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manage
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
This project is part of the City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program financed by federal
grants from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the settlement agreement with Los
Angeles World Airports (LAWA).
The RSI Program offers modifications to owners of qualifying residential property in the City of
El Segundo that reduce interior sound levels of noise generated by air traffic from neighboring
Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).
At its meeting on November 3, 2009 the City Council awarded a construction contract to Big
West Construction Corporation (Big West) for construction at 26 homes, commonly referred to
as Group 38 of the RSI Program.
The work has now been completed and the final contract amount is $746,207.09.
NAPI
Exhibit A
Residential Sound Insulation Program
(:rniiin iR
RSI
Number
Project
Address
38.01
860 Penn St.
38.02
862 Penn St.
38.03
1213 E. Acacia Ave.
38.04
856 Virginia St.
38.05
649 W. Maple
38.06
123 W. Maple
38.07
821 Virginia St.
38.08
933 Pepper St., Unit 1
38.09
933 Pepper St., Unit 2
38.10
933 Pepper St., Unit 3
38.11
933 Pepper St., Unit 4
38.12
933 Pepper St., Unit 5
38.13
933 Pepper St., Unit 6
38.14
1208 E. Imperial Ave., Unit A
38.15
1208 E. Imperial Ave., Unit B
38.16
1208 E. Imperial Ave., Unit C
38.17
1208 E. Imperial Ave., Unit D
38.18
1208 E. Imperial Ave., Unit E
38.19
1208 E. Imperial Ave., Unit F
38.20
951 Main St., Unit 101
38.21
951 Main St., Unit 102
38.22
951 Main St., Unit 201
38.23
951 Main St., Unit 202
38.24
951 Main St., Unit 203
951 Main St., Unit 204
L38.25
38.26
852 Lomita Street
.9
tJl
Recording Requested by
and When Recorded Mail To:
City Clerk, City Hall
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
Project Name: Residential Sound Insulation Program — Group 38
Project No.: RSI 09 -19
Notice is hereby given pursuant to State of California Civil Code Section 3093 et seq that:
The undersigned is an officer of the owner of interest stated below in the property hereinafter described.
2. The project owner's name is: City of El Segundo
3. The full addresses of the project are: attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference
4. The nature of the interest of the owner is:
5. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was field reviewed by City representatives
on: see attached Exhibit A
6. The work done was: Residential Sound Insulation Program Improvements
7. On August 17, 2010, City Council of the City of El Segundo accepted the work of this contract as being
complete and directed the recording of this Notice of Completion in the Office of the County Recorder.
8. The name of the Contractor for such work of improvement was: Big West Construction Corporation
9. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of El Segundo, County of
Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows: Private Residence(s) listed in Exhibit A
10. The street address of said properties are: set forth in Exhibit A
Dated:
Greg Carpenter
Planning and Building Safety Director
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, say: I am the Director of Planning and Building Safety of the City El Segundo, the
declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the
contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on at El Segundo, California.
Greg Carpenter
Planning and Building Safety Director
Notice of Completion
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
MEETING DATE: August 17, 2010
AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
Consideration and possible action to adopt Ordinance No. 1446 approving Environmental
Assessment EA No. 863 and Zone Text Amendment ZTA 10 -03 to amend the C -4 (Commercial
Center) Zone to allow: 1) medical and dental offices, not to exceed 5,000 square feet as
permitted uses, and 2) automobile sales and service centers, not to exceed 70,000 square feet as a
conditionally permitted use; and adopting Development Agreement No. 10 -01 (Fourth
Amendment to Development Agreement No.03 -01 with Rosecrans- Sepulveda Partners, 2, LLC
and PES Partners, LLC for the Plaza El Segundo development project located at 710 -860 South
Sepulveda Boulevard, 700 -740 Allied Way, and 2003 -2015 East Park Place to allow the
following uses: 1) a certified Farmer's Market to operate one day per week from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.;
2) Medical and Dental Offices, not to exceed a total of 5,000 square feet of floor area; 3) an
Automobile Sales and Service Center, not to exceed 70,000; and to allow the entire Plaza El
Segundo Development (Phase 1) to be considered as a single parcel for the purpose of meeting
the El Segundo Municipal Code minimum parking requirements and to eliminate the requirement
for individual parcels to have parking covenants recorded to transfer parking between parcels
within the Phase 1 Development. Applicant: PES Partners, LLC. (Fiscal Impact: None).
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1446 for Environmental Assessment EA
863, Zone Text Amendment ZTA 10 -03, and Development Agreement Amendment DA 10-
01; and /or
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other possible action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Ordinance No. 1446
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Amount Budgeted: N/A
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s): N/A
ORIGINATED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Kimberly Christensen, AICP, Planning Manager
Greg Carpenter, Director Kflanning and Building Safety
Jack Wayt, City Managei n
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
I. Background
On August 3, 2010, the City Council introduced an Ordinance to approve Environmental
Assessment EA 863, Zone Text Amendment ZTA 10 -03, and Development Agreement
Amendment DA 10 -01. The Ordinance was read into the record and is presented for a second
reading and adoption. If adopted without change, Ordinance No. 1446 will become effective in
30days.
P:\Planning & Building Safety \0 Planning - Old\PROJECTS (Planning) \851- 875\EA- 863 \City Council\EA 863 CC staff report 2nd reading
08172010.doc
ORDINANCE NO. 1446
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 03 -01
BETWEEN ROSECRANS- SEPULVEDA 2, LLC, AND ROSECRANS-
SEPULVEDA 3, LLC (PES PARTNERS, LLC), AND THE CITY OF EL
SEGUNDO AFFECTING THE PLAZA EL SEGUNDO DEVELOPMENT,
AND AMENDING EL SEGUNDO MUNICIPAL CODE ( "ESMC ") C -4
(COMMERCIAL CENTER) ZONE REGULATIONS.
The City Council of the City of El Segundo does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares that:
A. On March 15, 2005, the City Council of the City of El Segundo approved
Environmental Assessment No. 631, General Plan Amendment (GPA No.
03 -4), Zone Change (ZC No. 03 -2) and Subdivision (SUB 03 -7, Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 061630), and Development Agreement No. 03-
01, to re- designate and re -zone an approximately 54.9 -acre property at
the northeast corner of Sepulveda Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue. The
applicant is developing a 425,000 square foot shopping center, known as
Plaza El Segundo;
B. On February 19, 2010, the applicant filed an application for a Fourth
amendment ( "Fourth Amendment ") to Development Agreement No. 03 -01;
C. The application from PES Partners, LLC was reviewed by the City's
Planning and Building Safety Department for, in part, consistency with the
General Plan and conformity with the El Segundo Municipal Code
( "ESMC ");
D. In addition, the City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under
the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§
21000, et seq., "CEO X), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal.
Code of Regulations § §15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines "), and the
City's Environmental Guidelines (City Council Resolution No. 3805,
adopted March 16, 1993);
E. The Planning and Building Safety Department completed its review and
scheduled a public hearing regarding the application before the Planning
Commission for June 10, 2010;
F. The Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the application
on June 10, 2010. Thereafter, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. 2676, recommending that the City Council amend
Development Agreement No. 03 -01;
54
s `�
-1-
G. On August 3, 2010, the Council held a public hearing and considered the
information provided by the Planning Commission, City Staff, public
testimony, and representatives of the applicant PES Partners, LLC; and
H. This Ordinance and its findings are made based upon the testimony and
evidence presented to the Council at its August 3, 2010, public hearing
including, without limitation, the staff report submitted by the Planning and
Building Safety Department.
SECTION 2: Environmental Assessment Because of the findings set forth in Planning
Commission Resolution No. 2676, adopted June 10, 2010, which are incorporated by
this reference, and the facts set forth in the administrative record including, without
limitation, the staff report presented to the City Council, the proposed Fourth
Amendment to Development Agreement No. 03 -01 is consistent with the FEIR, entitled
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza El Segundo Development Final
Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2003121037), certified by the
City Council on March 15, 2005 and the Statement of Overriding Considerations
adopted in Section 5 of City Council Resolution No. 4415 on March 1, 2005.
Additionally, the El Segundo City Council adopted an Addendum to the FEIR and re-
adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations as Section 5 of City Council
Resolution No. 4542 on February 19, 2008. None of the elements set forth in Public
Resources Code § 21166 or CEQA Guidelines § 15162 exist. Accordingly, the City
need not prepare a subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report,
Mitigated Negative Declaration, or Addendum before the City Council adopts this
Ordinance approving the Fourth Amendment to Development Agreement No. 03 -01.
Nevertheless, the City Council reaffirms and readopts the Statement of Overriding
Considerations set forth in Exhibit "A" to Resolution No. 4415 adopted by the City
Council at a duly noticed public hearing on March 15, 2005, which is incorporated by
reference as if fully set forth in this Ordinance.
SECTION 3: Amendments to the Development Agreement. Development Agreement
No. 03 -01 is amended as set forth in attached Exhibit "A," which is incorporated into this
Ordinance by reference.
SECTION 4: El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC ") § 15 -5G -2 is amended to read as
follows:
"PERMITTED USES: The following uses are permitted in the C -4 zone:
A. Fitness centers (indoor only).
B. General offices not exceeding five thousand (5,000) square feet.
C. Medical and dental offices, not to exceed 5,000 square feet.
D. Pet supplies and services, including veterinary services.
E. Restaurants and cafes.
-2-
F. Retail and sales uses (excluding off site alcohol sales).
G. Other similar uses approved by the director of planning and building safety, as
provided by chapter 22 of this title."
SECTION 5: ESMC § 15 -5G -5 is amended to read as follows:
"USES SUBJECT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: The following uses are
allowed subject to obtaining a conditional use permit, as provided by chapter 23 of this
title:
A. On site sale and consumption of alcohol at bars.
B. Video arcades with four (4) or more video or arcade machines.
C. Automobile sales and service centers, not to exceed 70,000 square feet.
D. Other similar uses approved by the director of planning and building safety, as
provided by chapter 22 of this title."
SECTION 6: If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court
of competent jurisdiction, the city council intends that such invalidity will not affect the
effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end; the provisions
of this Ordinance are severable.
SECTION 7: This Ordinance will remain effective until superseded by a subsequent
ordinance.
SECTION 8: The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this
Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City of El Segundo's book of original
ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting;
and, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it
to be published or posted in accordance with California law.
-3-
SECTION 9: This Ordinance will become effective on the thirty -first (31st) day following
its passage and adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of August, 2010.
Eric Busch, Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 1446 was duly introduced by said City Council at a regular meeting held
on the 3rd day of August, 2010, and was duly passed and adopted by said City Council,
approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the 17th day of August, 2010, and the same was so
passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MARK D. HENSLEY, City Attorney
Karl H. Berger, Assistant City Attorney
PAPlanning & Building Safety \Planning -Old \PROJECTS (Plan ning) \826 - 850 \EA 831 \EA- 863.draft CC Ordinance.08.17.10
J I
-4-
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
350 Main Street
El Segundo, California 90245
EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES
Pursuant to Government Code § 6103
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND AMONG
THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND
ROSECRANS - SEPULVEDA PARTNERS, 2, LLC AND
PES PARTNERS, LLC
(AREA A)
THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED WITHIN TEN DAYS OF EXECUTION BY
ALL PARTIES HERETO PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF GOVERNMENT
CODE §65868.5
1 8/5/2010
44386 \1273112v18
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. Recitals.......................... ......................................................................... ..............................1
.. ...............................
2. Amendments to Section 4.1 of the Development Agreement .............
Remain in Full Force and Effect ......................3
3. Remainder of Development Agreement to
DEFINITIONS.............................................................................. ............................... EXHIBIT A
.iJ
i 8/5/2010
44386 \127311208
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Fourth Amendment to Development Agreement ( "Fourth Amendment ") is made and
entered into by and among the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation ( "City ") and
ROSECRANS - SEPULVEDA PARTNERS, 2, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ( "RSP
2 ") and PES PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ( "PESP ") as of this
day of , 2010. RSP 2 and PESP are collectively referred to as "Developer." City and
Developer are individually referred to as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." In consideration
of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Fourth Amendment, City and
Developer agree as follows:
1. Recitals. This Fourth Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and for the
following purposes, each of which is acknowledged as true and correct by the Parties:
1.1 RSP 2's and PESP's predecessor -in- interest, Rosecrans - Sepulveda
Partners, LLC ( "RSP "), and the City are parties to a Development Agreement dated March 16,
2005 (the "Development Agreement "), which Development Agreement was recorded on April 6,
2005 in the Official Records of Los Angeles County as Instrument No. 05 0797875.
1.2 Unless otherwise stated in this Fourth Amendment, all capitalized terms
used in this Fourth Amendment have the same definitions as set forth in the Development
Agreement.
1.3 On November 10, 2005, RSP and RSP 2 executed an Assignment and
Assumption Agreement (the "RSP 2 Assignment ") whereby RSP conveyed to RSP 2, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of the Development Agreement, RSP's right, title,
and interest in and to the Development Agreement and the Project Approvals with respect to
approximately 4.7 acres of the Property (the "RSP 2 Property "). The RSP 2 Assignment was
recorded on January 19, 2006 in the Official Records of Los Angeles County as Instrument No.
06 0128517.
1.4 On November 10, 2005, RSP and PESP's predecessor -in- interest,
Rosecrans - Sepulveda Partners, 3, LLC ( "RSP 3 ") executed an Assignment and Assumption
Agreement (the "RSP 3 Assignment ") whereby RSP conveyed to RSP 3, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 3 of the Development Agreement, RSP's right, title, and interest in and to
the Development Agreement and the Project Approvals with respect to approximately 37.3 acres
of the Property (the "PESP Property" and /or "Phase IA"). The RSP 3 Assignment was recorded
on January 19, 2006 in the Official Records of Los Angeles County as Instrument No. 06
0128518.
1.5 On July 31, 2007, RSP 3 executed an Assignment and Assumption
Agreement ( "PESP Assignment ") whereby RSP 3 conveyed to PESP, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 3 of the Development Agreement, RSP 3's right, title and interest in and to
the Development Agreement and the Project Approvals with respect to the PESP Property. The
PESP Assignment was recorded on August 3, 2007 in the Official Records of Los Angeles
County as Instrument No. 2007 1838772.
44386 \127311208 1 8/5/2010
1.6 As of June 19, 2007, City, RSP 2 and RSP 3 executed Operating
Memorandum No. 1 to the Development Agreement ( "Operating Memorandum No. I"), which
Operating Memorandum No. 1 was recorded on August 14, 2007 in the Official Records of Los
Angeles County as Instrument No. 20071901777.
1.7 As of July 30, 2007, City, RSP 2 and RSP 3 executed a First Amendment
to Development Agreement (the "First Amendment ") which First Amendment was recorded on
October 2, 2007 in the Official Records of Los Angeles County as Instrument No. 2007
2256909.
1.8 As of March 4, 2008, City, RSP 2 and PESP executed a Second
Amendment to Development Agreement (the "Second Amendment ") which Second Amendment
was recorded on March 25, 2008 in the Official Records of Los Angeles County as Instrument
No. 20080507797. For purposes of this Third Amendment, the term "Development Agreement"
shall include the First and Second Amendments.
1.9 As of July 21, 2009, City, RSP 2 and PESP executed a Third Amendment
to Development Agreement (the "Third Amendment ") which Third Amendment was recorded on
March 26, 2010 in the Official Records of Los Angeles County as Instrument No. 20100414500
For purposes of this Fourth Amendment, the term "Development Agreement" shall include the
First, Second, and Third Amendments.
1.10 The limitations imposed within the Development Agreement were
primarily intended to ensure that the Project remain principally retail in nature and to prevent
significant competition with the business in downtown El Segundo. As the Project has evolved,
the Developer realized that certain service - oriented businesses provide an excellent complement
to the retail tenant base and, in fact, have and will greatly assisted in insuring the survival of the
small tenants who are not destination - oriented. The addition of the proposed uses within this
Fourth Amendment are consistent with the goal of maintaining a thriving retail center with
minimal vacancies and with the attendant production of sales tax proceeds to the City. Without
these uses, the Developer believes that the vacancies that currently exist will remain for the
foreseeable future and the boutique tenants will face a greater chance of failure.
1.11 Section 4.1.11 is added by this Fourth Amendment to allow the use of a
certified farmer's market. The use is intended to be primarily the sale of retail goods such as but
not limited to produce, baked goods, dairy products, flowers and other food and retail items
direct to consumers from farmers and other vendors. A musician may be present, with amplified
sound, to enhance the shopping experience at the farmer's market. The market will typically
operate one day per week from 8 a.m. — 3 p.m., with set up between 7 a.m. — 8 a.m. and clean up
between 3 p.m. -4 p.m., and will typically occupy one row of parking spaces in Phase 1. Traffic
studies have shown that this use will not have a negative impact on the access or parking
availability during the farmer's market operation.
1.12 Section 4.1.12 is added by this Fourth Amendment to allow the uses of
medical and dental offices and ancillary uses on a limited basis, in Phase 1.
44386 \1273112v18 1 6
2 8/5/2010
1.13 Section 4.1.13 is added by this Fourth Amendment to allow the use of an
automobile sales and service center. This use is intended to allow the sale of new vehicles, used
vehicles, vehicle parts (including but not limited to tires) and accessories directly to consumers,
and including a storage lot and showroom, as well as a full service vehicle maintenance and
repair center in Phase 1B, subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit by the City of El
Segundo.
1.14 The City Council determined that none of the elements set forth in Public
Resources Code § 21166 or CEQA Guidelines § 15162 ( "CEQA Guidelines ") exist.
Accordingly, the City Council finds, in accordance with Public Resources Code § 21166 or
CEQA Guidelines § 15162 ( "CEQA Guidelines, that no subsequent or supplemental
Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration is required to be prepared
before adopting the Ordinance approving this Fourth Amendment.
1.15 Section 15 of the Development Agreement provides for amendment of the
Development Agreement upon mutual consent of the parties and in accordance with the
procedures established by the Development Agreement Act. The City Council found that this
Fourth Amendment has been adopted in conformance with the procedures of the Development
Agreement Statute set forth in Government Code §§ 65865, et seq.
1.16 On June 10, 2010, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing on this Fourth Amendment and, at the conclusion thereof, adopted Resolution No. 2676,
recommending to the City Council approval of this Fourth Amendment.
1.17 On July 20, 2010 and subsequently on August 3, 2010, the City Council
held a duly noticed public hearing on this Fourth Amendment and, at the conclusion thereof,
introduced Ordinance No. 1446 and on August 17, 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance
No. 1446 approving this Fourth Amendment. Ordinance No. 1446 became effective on
September 17, 2010.
2. Amendments to Section 4.1 of the Development Agreement. Section 4.1 of the
Development Agreement is amended to add new Sections 4.1.11, 4.1.12, 4.1.13 and 4.1.14 to
read as follows:
"4.1.11 Farmer's Market. A certified Farmer's Market, at which farmers and other vendors sell
produce, baked goods, dairy products and other food and retail goods directly to consumers, is
permitted to operate in the parking lot of Phase 1. A musician may be present, with amplified
sound. The market will typically operate one day per week (Wednesday) from 8 a.m. — 3 p.m.,
with set -up between 7 a.m. -8 a.m. and clean -up between 3 p.m. -4 p.m. A site plan that includes
the location of the Farmer's Market must be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the
Director of Planning and Building Safety. "
"4.1.12 Medical and Dental Office. Medical and dental offices and ancillary uses are permitted,
provided such uses do not exceed a total of 5,000 square feet of floor area."
44386 \1273112x18 3 16,-. 8/5/2010
"4.1.13 A_ utomobile Dealership and Service Center. An automobile dealership which sells new
vehicles, used vehicles, vehicle parts (including tires) and accessories directly to consumers, and
including a storage lot and showroom, as well as an full service vehicle maintenance and repair
center, is an allowable use in Phase 1B subject to a valid Conditional Use Permit issued by the
City, provided such use does not exceed a total building area of 70,000 square feet."
"4.1.14 Parking. The total number of parking spaces provided on an individual parcel need not
comply with the El Segundo Municipal Code, provided that the total number of parking spaces
within the entire Plaza El Segundo Phase 1 Shopping Center conform to the El Segundo
Municipal Code and provided that such parking spaces are remain collectively available and
accessible to all tenants of the Plaza El Segundo Phase 1 Shopping Center and their customers,
employees and invitees."
Remainder of Development Agreement to Remain in Full Force and EffectExcept
as set forth in this Fourth Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Development Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer and City have executed this Fourth Amendment on the
date first above written.
CITY:
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation
ATTEST
Cindy Mortesen
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
Eric Busch, Mayor
[SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE]
44386 \1273112v18 4
1 6 3 8/5/2010
DEVELOPER
ROSECRANS - SEPULVEDA PARTNERS, 2,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
By: CCA Sepulveda, LLC, a California
limited liability company
Its: Managing Member
By:
Name:
Its:
By:
Name:
Its:
PES PARTNERS, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: Rosecrans -Sepulveda Partners 3, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
Its: Sole Member
By: CCA Sepulveda, LLC
a California limited liability
company
Its: Managing Member
By:_
Name:
Its:
By:_
Name:
Its:
44386 \127311208 5 6 4 8/5/2010
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
On , 2010 before me, (here insert name of the
officer), Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same
in his/her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her /their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary Public
[Seal]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
On , 2010 before me, (here insert name of the
officer), Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same
in his/her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her /their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary Public
[Seal]
44386 \127311208 6 6 `} 8/5/2010
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
On , 2010 before me, (here insert name of the
officer), Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same
in his/her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her /their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary Public
[Seal]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
On , 2010 before me, (here insert name of the
officer), Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same
in his/her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her /their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary Public
[Seal]
44386 \127311208 7 1 6 G) 8/5/2010
EXHIBIT "A"
DEFINITIONS
Section
CEQAGuidelines ....................................................................................... ............................... 1.16
City............................................................................... ............................... ...................Introduction
Developer..................................................................... ............................... ...................Introduction
DevelopmentAgreement .............................................................................. ............................... 1.1
FirstAmendment ......................................................................................... ............................... 1.7
OperatingMemorandum No. 1 ..................................................................... ............................... 1.6
Party/Parties ................................................................. ............................... ...................Introduction
PESP............................................................................ ............................... ...................Introduction
PESPAssignment ......................................................................................... ............................... 1.5
PESPProperty ............................................................................................... ............................... 1.4
PhaselA ....................................................................................................... ............................... 1.4
Phase113 ........................................................................................................ ............................... 1.8
Phase1B Property ......................................................................................... ............................... 1.8
RSP............................................................................................................... ............................... 1.1
RSP2 ........................................................................... ............................... ...................Introduction
RSP2 Assignment ........................................................................................ ............................... 1.3
RSP2 Property .............................................................................................. ............................... 1.3
RSP3 ............................................................................................................ ...............................
1.4
RSP3 Assignment ........................................................................................ ...............................
1.4
SecondAmendment ...................................................................................... ...............................
1.8
ThirdAmendment ........................................................ ............................... ...................Introduction
44386 \1273112vl8 Definitions -1 8/5/2010
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
MEETING DATE: August 17, 2010
AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
Consideration of possible action regarding a request for Community Challenge Grant funds from
the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the purposes of updating the General
Plan and Zoning Regulations. (Fiscal Impact: grant award of $640,000 with $160,000
commitment of City matching funds)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Authorize the submittal of the grant application and the commitment of $160,000 in
matching funds and in -kind staff time, and /or
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other possible action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit the Community Challenge Grant
application and committing to provide 20% in matching funds and in -kind staff time.
FISCAL IMPACT: $160,000 (dedicated funds)
Amount Budgeted: $108,000
Additional Appropriation: $52,000 from FY's 2010 -2012 General Plan Maintenance
Fund revenues
Account Number(s): 703 - 200 - 2402 -3816
ORIGINATED BY: Greg Carpenter, Director of Vlanning and Building Safety
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manage
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
I. Backsround
The Department of Housing and Urban Development has released a notice of funding
availability for Community Challenge Planning Grants. The purpose of these grants is to allow
local governments to update plans and/or regulations to promote "livability" of communities in
such areas as:
• Increasing transportation choices,
• Promoting equitable, affordable housing,
• Enhancing economic competitiveness,
• Supporting existing communities,
• Coordinating policies and leveraging investment, and;
• Valuing communities and neighborhoods
These are all policy areas that a city's general plan would typically address and design policies
and programs to accomplish. El Segundo has been informed by the State of California of its
F4_;3
b�
responsibility to update its general plan that was last comprehensively updated in 1992. To
address this need, in 2009 the City Council placed a surcharge on all building permits to create a
dedicated General Plan Maintenance Fund. This fund has a current balance of approximately
$108,000 and is expected to bring in $50,000 to $80,000 per year depending on development
activity.
With the consent of the City Council, staff intends to request a grant in the amount of $640,000
to prepare an update to the City's General Plan, the preparation of the necessary Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) and revisions to the Zoning Regulations to implement recommendations
made through the General Plan update process.
The grant requires a commitment on the City's part to fund a minimum of 20% of the project
cost. In this case, staff would intend to use approximately $160,000 (the current balance as well
as fund accrual in 2011 and 2012) from the General Plan Maintenance fund and staff's time to
exceed the 20% matching requirement.
PAPlanning & Building Safety\Administrative \Council Staff Reports 2010 \Community Challenge Grant
i 6 : 2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND DIRECTOR
OF PLANNING AND BUILDING SAFETY TO APPLY FOR, RECEIVE,
AND APPROPRIATE GRANT FUNDS FOR AN UPDATE OF THE
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING REGULATIONS
The City Council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows: The City of El Segundo
requests $640,000 in funding assistance through the Community Challenge Planning
Grant program and is committed to providing the required 20% matching requirement of
$160,000.
SECTION 2: The City Manager and Director of Planning and Building Safety are
authorized to apply for a grant of $640,000 from the Department of Housing and Urban
Development to be used for updating the City's General Plan and Zoning Regulations.
SECTION 3: The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute any required
documents to receive the grant for the purposes identified herein.
SECTION 4: The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to accept and spend the
grant monies identified in this Resolution for the purposes set forth herein.
SECTION 5: The City Council hereby amends or supplements the City's Budget for
fiscal year 2009/2010 or 2010/2011, as applicable, to appropriate the monies identified
herein to pay for the services proposed by the City in support of its grant application.
The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to implement the purpose of this section.
SECTION 6: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of August, 2010.
Eric Busch, Mayor
Page 1 of 2
it
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and
signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the day of , 2010, and the same was so passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MARK D. HENSLEY, CITY ATTORNEY
0
Karl H. Berger, Assistant City Attorney
Page 2 of 2
171
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 17, 2010
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding a request for Transportation Investment
Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER II) grant funds for (1) infrastructure
improvements to El Segundo Blvd. between Whiting St. and Aviation Blvd. and (2)
extension of Park Place between Nash Street and Sepulveda Blvd. (Fiscal Impact:
$550,000 in grant monies as match)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Authorize the submittal of a TIGER II grant application for infrastructure
improvements to El Segundo Blvd. between Whiting and Aviation Blvd.
2. Authorize the submittal of a TIGER II grant application for the extension of Park
Place between Nash St. and Sepulveda Blvd
3. Alternatively, discuss and take other possible action related to this item..
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Two (2) Resolutions
FISCAL IMPACT: Potential
Amount Budgeted: $550,000
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s):
ORIGINATED BY: Stephanie Katsouleas, Public Works Director
REVIEWED BY: Stephanie Katsouleas, Publ� orks Director
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manage
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
The U.S. Department of Transportation recently released a notice of availability for
Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER II) grant funds. The purpose
of the grant is to support projects that will have a significant effect throughout the nation on
metropolitan areas due to (1) highway or bridge projects, (2) public transportation projects, (3)
passenger and freight rail transportation projects; and (4) port infrastructure investments. The
grant requires that each project submitted request a minimum $10 million and provide 20%
matching funds.
Public work would like to submit two projects for TIGER II grant consideration. The first
project proposes infrastructure improvements to El Segundo Blvd. between Whiting St. and
Aviation Blvd, which include pavement rehabilitation, overhead utility relocation to underground
facilities, sidewalk widening for ADA compliance, and creation of east/west bike lanes linking
the green line with industrial and commercial centers. The funding request for this project is $10
million, the minimum required request. The second project proposes to extend Park Place from
Nash St. through phase I1 of Plaza El Segundo to Sepulveda Blvd. The project is complicated by
the fact that even if relocated, existing rail grades must be maintained. The funding request for
this project is also the minimum amount of $10 million. Matching funds for each project have
been identified as follows:
El Segundo Blvd Infrastructure Improvement:
$400,000 Southern California Rule 20A monies
$50,000 Measure R Local Return
$100,000 Proposition C
$1,450,000 Utilities match for overhead relocation
$2,000,000 Total
Park Place Extension:
$2,000,000 Developer Contribution
Grants must be submitted by August 23, 2010 to be considered for funding. With the consent of
City Council, staff intends to request grant funding for these two projects, for a combined total of
$20 million. If funds area awarded, staff anticipates that there will be no addition cost to the City
beyond to the available grant funds identified above.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND DIRECTOR
OF PUBLIC WORKS TO APPLY FOR, RECEIVE, AND APPROPRIATE
GRANT FUNDS FOR PARK PLACE EXTENSION AND RAILROAD
GRADE SEPARATION NASH STREET TO ALLIED WAY
The City Council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows: The City of El Segundo
requests $10,000,000 in funding assistance through the Transportation Investment
Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER II) grant program and is committed to providing
the required 20% matching requirement of $2,000,000.
SECTION 2: The City Manager and Director of Public Works are authorized to apply for
a grant of $10,000,000 from the U.S. Department of Transportation to be used for
infrastructure improvements to the City's transportation corridors.
SECTION 3: The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute any required
documents to receive the grant for the purposes identified herein.
SECTION 4: The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to accept and spend the
grant monies identified in this Resolution for the purposes set forth herein.
SECTION 5: The City Council hereby amends or supplements the City's Budget for
fiscal year 2009/2010 or 2010/2011, as applicable, to appropriate the monies identified
herein to pay for the services proposed by the City in support of its grant application.
The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to implement the purpose of this section.
SECTION 6: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of August, 2010.
Eric Busch, Mayor
Page 1 of 2 it
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and
signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the day of , 2010, and the same was so passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MARK D. HENSLEY, CITY ATTORNEY
Karl H. Berger, Assistant City Attorney
Page 2of2 j7 '
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND DIRECTOR
OF PUBLIC WORKS TO APPLY FOR, RECEIVE, AND APPROPRIATE
GRANT FUNDS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS TO EL
SEGUNDO BLVD. BETWEEN WHITING ST. AND AVIATION BLVD.
The City Council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows: The City of El Segundo
requests $10,000,000 in funding assistance through the Transportation Investment
Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER II) grant program and is committed to providing
the required 20% matching requirement of $2,000,000.
SECTION 2: The City Manager and Director of Public Works are authorized to apply for
a grant of $10,000,000 from the U.S. Department of Transportation to be used for
infrastructure improvements to the City's transportation corridors.
SECTION 3: The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute any required
documents to receive the grant for the purposes identified herein.
SECTION 4: The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to accept and spend the
grant monies identified in this Resolution for the purposes set forth herein.
SECTION 5: The City Council hereby amends or supplements the City's Budget for
fiscal year 2009/2010 or 2010/2011, as applicable, to appropriate the monies identified
herein to pay for the services proposed by the City in support of its grant application.
The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to implement the purpose of this section.
SECTION 6: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of August, 2010.
Eric Busch, Mayor
Page 1 of 2
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and
signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the day of , 2010, and the same was so passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MARK D. HENSLEY, CITY ATTORNEY
In
Karl H. Berger, Assistant City Attorney
Page 2 of 2
z �
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
MEETING DATE: August 17, 2010
AGENDA HEADING: New Business
Consideration and possible action regarding the presentation of fiscal year 2009 -2010
third quarter Financial Review and presentation of the fiscal year 2010 -2011 Preliminary
Budget. (Fiscal Impact: None )
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
(1) Receive and file FY 2009 -2010 Third Quarter Financial staff report
(2) Receive and file FY 2010 -2011 Preliminary Budget
(3) Publish announcements of the key budget dates:
a) Public Hearing September 7, 2010, 7:00 p.m.
b) Continued Public Hearing and Adoption September 21, 2010, 7:00 p.m.
(4) Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Amount Budgeted: $0
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s): None
ORIGINATED BY: Angelina Garcia, Fiscal Services Manager
REVIEWED BY: Deborah Cullen, Director ofyipanceLNIL
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manager
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
Third Quarter Financial Review Fiscal Year 2009 -2010
Staff has reviewed all revenues and expenditures for the third quarter of Fiscal Year 2009 -2010,
with an emphasis on the General Fund. As we review the third quarter results and begin the
budgeting process for FY 2010 -2011, the City faces uncertain economic times and difficult
financial challenges. Although there are general indicators that show small signs of recovery, the
City's business and industry sectors are struggling to recover. The City is experiencing the
results of a revenue -to- expenditure structural deficit coupled with the worst economic recession
in memory.
10
� � rJ
The structural deficit is driven by the growth in employee compensation exceeding annual
revenue growth for the past several years and if not addressed, this deficit will not be sustainable
in the future. The City has managed to balance the budget in prior years using transfers in from
other Funds. This is not a sustainable option as the Economic Uncertainty Fund and Internal
Service Funds no longer have excess balances to transfer to the General Fund.
The line graph below depicts the growing gap between revenues and expenditures. This
structural problem can be solved by either increasing revenues and /or decreasing employee
compensation. Given the current economic recession forecasting any substantial revenue growth
is clearly not achievable.
General Fund - Revenue & Expenditure Trends
Thousands -+-Total Revenues, net of Transfers --Total Expenditures
$80,000
$75,000 - __
$7.75 million in transfers were authorized in the FY 09/10 Budget.
$70,000 -
$65,000 - - - - $62,631 _
$58,449
$58,32fi__ $59,119
$60,000 - _
w_ $55,060 $54,934 $54,421 $54,505
3 $55,000 -
0
$50,054 $50,873__ $52 121-
$50,000
$q 42 $48,080
$45,000 - - - -- - - -- — —
$44,861
V$36,O 44 $43,069
$40,000 75 $41,725
$37,36 9
$35,000 --
$34,300
$30,000
1998 -99 99 -2000 2000 -01 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 2004 -05 2005 -06 2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10
(est.)
Fiscal Year
During the past several years Council and staff have been working to contain and reduce the
growth of employee compensation. In the last set of labor negotiations a cost sharing of future
health benefit increase was successfully negotiated with one labor group, and during the last
negotiations with the Safety groups significant progress was made toward reducing the cost
escalation of the special compensation available to the safety groups by converting the special
compensation pay from percents to flat dollar amounts. Since special compensation could
account for up to 60% more in salary costs compared to base salaries the conversion from
percents to flat amounts was critical to begin controlling salary growth. Unfortunately, the
ongoing economic downturn now requires that Council consider additional options for
permanent reductions in expenditures.
The graph below illustrates the continuing gap between tax revenues, which are our core
revenues, and salary /benefit costs over the last five years.
Tax Revenues v. Salaries & Benefits
tTotal Tax Revenue -� -Total Salaries &Benefits:
0 $50,000 $48,258
V
c
- $45
$48,000 -- -
$46,1
r
- --
$46,000 _ -_ --
- - ,151- - - - -
1414- f
$44,000 - -
$42,215 $42,822
$42,000 -
$40,000
- -- - - - - - - $39,990
$39,266
$38,000 - -
$37,893
$36,000 1 —_ -- --
$34,000
- - - -- - -
$32,000 - - --
$32,897
- _ - - -- -
$30,000
2004 -05 2005 -06 2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -2010
Fiscal Year
To minimize the projected shortfall during the first nine months of the fiscal year staff has taken
the following actions to reduce expenditures:
• A retirement incentive was offered and 14 employees opted to retire. Many of those
positions have remained vacant or are being filled with part-time employees with no
benefits provided;
• A hiring freeze has been instituted for all vacancies and only critical positions are being
filled with the approval of the City Manager;
• The Fire Department is running down staffing levels to reduce overtime;
• Meetings have been held with the City's bargaining groups to discuss the current
financial challenges and the prospect of employee concessions;
• Non personnel expenditures have been reduced.
As a result of these measures, staff projects expenditures are estimated to come in $3,378,500
under the adopted budget.
Last December the City Council directed staff to request a survey from Los Angeles County Fire
Department to assess the cost and service levels that would be recommended by the County to
provide fire services to the City of El Segundo. The feasibility study has been completed and has
been provided to the City for analysis. This is an additional option that could be considered for
permanent cost reductions.
General Fund Revenues
The biggest impact to tax revenues is in the "Other Taxes" category consisting of Sales and Use
Tax, Transient Occupancy Tax, Utility Users Tax, Franchise Tax and Cogenerated Tax. This
category is currently projected to end the year $5.8 million below budget and $3.5 million below
FY 2008 -2009 actuals. These revenue reductions are driven by the decrease in the price of
natural gas, reduction of consumption, and a very sluggish economy.
The City relies on "Other Taxes" to provide 54% of the General Fund revenues. These revenue
sources are much more sensitive to the economic impacts on the business and industry sector and
are much more difficult to forecast. Most South Bay cities rely on the stability of Property Tax
for a majority of their tax revenue whereas El Segundo receives only 11% of the General Fund
revenue from Property Tax.
Detailed information is provided below, but for summary purposes staff is projecting that
General Fund revenues will fall short of the adopted budget by $6.5 million and will end the
fiscal year $4.5 million below FY 2008 -2009 actuals.
The following is a list of major General Fund revenues and the performance of each source
through June 30, lulu:
Variance
FY 2009-
Over/
Prior Year
Current Year
FY 2009-
% of
2010
(Under) FY
2009
through
Through
2010 Adopted
Budget
Year -end
-2010
Revenue Source
6130109
6130110
Budget
Received
Estimate
Budget
Business License
9,173,861
9,193,909
8,995,900
102.20%
9,275,000
279,100
Sales & Use Tax
7,170,129
5,820,281
9,315,000
62.48%
8,185,000
(1,130,000)
Sales Tax in Lieu
3,467,910
2,837,198
3,742,900
75.80%
2,837,200
(905,700)
Property Tax
5,773,407
5,797,074
6,350,000
91.29%
6,351,300
1,300
Transient Occupancy (TOT)
2,966,079
2,788,617
4,450,000
62.67%
3,875,000
(575,000)
Charges for Services
2,932,017
2,419,854
3,562,700
67.92%
3,238,550
(324,150)
Electric Utility Tax
2,667,093
2,255,656
3,750,000
60.15%
3,100,000
(650,000)
Franchise Tax
3,500,372
2,238,599
3,700,000
60.50%
2,350,000
(1,350,000)
Cogenerated Electric
1,158,185
975,117
2,100,000
46.43%
1,352,500
(747,500)
License & Permits
1,128,731
829,282
1,191,100
69.62%
1,208,700
17,600
Gas Utility Tax
873,295
1,080,515
1,650,000
65.49%
1,233,000
(417,000)
Interest on Investments
988,084
502,276
1,300,000
38.64%
900,000
(400,000)
Other Revenues
3,013,470
3,369,212
4,491,150
75.02%
4,154,100
(337,050)
Total General Fund Revenues
Net of Transfers
44,812,633
40,107,590
54,598,750
73.46%
48,060,350
(6,538,400)
Transfers In
3,602,776
5,797,278
7,729,650
75.00%
7,729,650
-
Total General Fund Revenues
48,415,409
45,904,868
62,328,400
73.65%
55,790,000
(6,538,400)
.i.01
Business License Tax is the City's second largest General s collected Fund
January and February,
18% of total revenues. The majority of this revenue stream
y will
and based on the revenues received in the first 9 months of t fiscal ha to exceed budget at therend of
exceed the adopted budget projection. This category is estim
the year by $279,100.
Business License Tax
FY 2009 Actual Revenue: $9,350,046
FY 2010 Adopted Budget: $8,995,900
FY 2010 Yearend Estimate: $9,275,000
Sales & Use Tax and Sales Tax in Lieu combined is the City's largest revenue source,
accounting for 22% of the General Fund revenues. Saloertin and the
same
January through March sales (1 quarter for sales tax reporting) were 13.5% lower than
quarter last year. Actual sales activity was down 12.7% when reporting aberrations were
factored out. The City has experienced a significant decline in business and industry due partly
to negative adjustments to estimated taxes, a business relocation, and overall decline in sales.
Despite higher fuel prices, revenues dropped in service stations due to a decline in refinery
capital expenditures. Taxable sales for all of Los Angeles County increased 0.3% compared to
the first quarter last year while the Southern California region as a whole was up 0.5 %. The
current economy will continue to impact this revenue stream and our yearend estimate is based
on ending the year below budget by over $1.1 million.
Sales Tax in Lieu is received in two payments each year (January and May) and is calculated as
a percentage of the estimated Sales and Use Tax. The two, Sales & Use Tax and Sales Tax in
Lieu, are projected to end the year under budget by $1,030,000 and $630,700, respectively,
below same period last year.
Sales & Use Tax
FY 2009 Actual Revenue: $9,286,806
FY 2010 Adopted Budget: $9,315,000
FY 2010 Yearend Estimate: $8,185,000
Sales Tax in Lieu
FY 2009Actual Revenue: $3,467,911
FY 2010 Adopted Budget: $3,742,900
FY 2010 Yearend Estimate: $2,837,200
Property Tax is currently 0.04% or $23,667 more than the same period last year and is projected
to end the year at budget. The City has experienced a net taxable value increase of 2.6% for the
2009 -2010 tax roll, which is better than the decrease experienced countywide of -0.6 %. The
assessed value increase between 2008 -2009 and 2009 -2010 was $251 million. The growth
attributed to the Assessor granted 2% CPI adjustment was $159 million, which accounted for
63% of all growth experienced in the City.
JL
Property Taxes
FY 2009 Actual Revenue: $6,267,592
FY 2010 Adopted Budget: $6,350,000
FY 2010 Yearend Estimate: $6,351,300
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is currently 6.81% or $207,181 o below the and e period all t
year, with 63 % of budget received. This revenue stream c 0 a lag
sensitive to the economy. Through the second quarter of FY 2009-2010, TOT was show on staff
compared to the second quarter of FY 2008 -2009, and that trend
levels and a
inquiries the decrease in this category is due to lower than
rcprojected
sho anc the budgeted
reduction in room rates. Staff is projecting this revenue
amount by $575,000.
Transient Occupancy Tax
FY 2009 Actual Revenue: $4,109,581
FY 2010 Adopted Budget: $4,450,000
FY 2010 Yearend Estimate: $3,875,000
Electric Utility User's Tax is estimated to come in lower urce is a6 61.2 % tof budget
to a reduction in consumption. As of June 30, 2010, this r evenue so
Based on staff research, the industry consumption of electricity is down driven mainly by the
slow economic recovery, business downsizing and cooler than normal spring and summer. The
first 9 months of FY 2009 -10 showed a marked decline averaging 12.76% below the same period
last year.
Electric Utility User's Tax
FY 2009 Actual Revenue: $3,595,795
FY 2010 Adopted Budget: $3,750,000
FY 2010 Yearend Estimate: $3,100,000
The next three revenue sources have all been impacted by the
fromreduction
a high of $1.23 per therm n
gas. Over the past two years the price of natural gas has gone
July 2008 to an average of $0.45 during 2009 and 2010: This price which impacts rd the utility the total by
cost of gas produced thereby reducing the production price
the consumer. Prior to the drastic declines in the last two years the average price of a therm of
natural gas from January 2004 through April 2008 was $0.
Franchise Tax is one of the City's major revenue sources that has been impacted by the
decrease in the price of natural gas. This years annual payment from one of the top tax
producers was $1.2 million lower than last year's payment primarily due to the decrease in the
price of natural gas. This company accounts for over 50% of the total revenue received in this
category. Most franchise payments are made to the City once each year while two cable
franchises are made on a quarterly basis.
J
Franchise Tax $3,577,958
FY 2009 Actual Revenue: $3,700,000
FY 2010 Adopted Budget:
FY 2010 Yearend Estimate: $2,350,000
Co g enerated Electric Utility User's Tax is estimated to come in lower which bs thetco by
$747,500 attributable to a reduction in the Short Run Avoided
that the local refinery pays Southern California Edison (SCE) for electricity au s hied dto and used
to value the cogenerated production for the tax payment. This SRA formu
in natural gas prices.
Cogenerated Electric Utility User's $ a313,320
FY 2009 Actual Revenue: $2,100,000
FY 2010 Adopted Budget: 352,500
FY 2010 Yearend Estimate: $ 1 franchise
Gas Utility Tax is currently at 65.5% of budget. As with the additionally ele trio nd to predict
tax this revenue is impacted by the price of natural gas and but ongoing effect of economic
based on the erratic month -to -month power plant generation and o end the year $417,000 lower
recession on gas usage itself. This revenue category is estimate t
than budget but $207,000 or 23.7% higher than at June 30, 2009. This revenue source continues
to be difficult to forecast based on the uncertainty of the local power plant and the fluctuation of
the price of natural gas.
Gas Utility Tax
FY 2009 Actual Revenue: $1,117,572
FY 2010 Adopted Budget: $1,650,000
FY 2010 Yearend Estimate: $1,233,000
Charges for Services includes Zoning and Planning fees,
Plan Check fees, Plan Retention fees,
Energy Plan Check fees, and Planning Service fees and have /o b0, d bud Staff
of had f62,70 d
The City has received $2,419,854 or 67.9 combined throug h June
in the continued slowdown in housing and construction in the budbelow budget r $324,150. 0010.
At this time staff is estimating this revenue group to end the year
Charges for Services $ 4,035,661
FY 2009 Actual Revenue:
FY 2010 Adopted Budget: $ 3,562,700
FY 2010 Yearend Estimate: $ 3,238,550
184
,517 or
License and Permits In the first quarter this revenue group recorded r venues f budget and
52.6% of budget. At third quarter this revenue stream is tracking Y
is anticipated to end the year slightly over budget.
License and Permits $ 1,474,433
FY 2009 Actual Revenue: $ 1,191,100
FY 2010 Adopted Budget: 1,208,700
FY 2010 Yearend Estimate: $
in the
Both License and Permits and Charges for services have experienced a ll decrease the past year
volume in construction activity, particularly the large, high -value projects. there have not b
any
the City has just had one office project at Imperial and n focused on remodeli ge tenant
significant ground -up projects started this year. Activity has been
values, the
improvements and residential sound insulation. With the reduction is real lati estate
development
difficulty in obtaining financing and the challenge in finding t P
has essentially been on hold this year which impacts permits and fees.
economic
Interest on Investments has experienced a significant reduction uest oche current
and long-term
crisis and the result of the Federal Reserve Banks rate reduction
interest rates. Currently, the City's portfolio is invested in Local Agency Investment Funds
(LAIF) (37% of the portfolio value), money market accounts issues oft e portfol o value), of the portfolio value),
of the
negotiable CD's (3% of the portfolio Federal
The average return on our
and miscellaneous securities (30% p ortfolio
miscellaneous securities through third quarter ° was 5.1 %, and LAIF t continue 0.3 , and d with the to al
average return for entire portfolio being 3.18%. LAIF is predict or
less through the end of the year and we are estimating interest income will be lower than budget
by $400,000.
Interest on Investments $ 3,241,784
FY 2009 Actual: 1,300,000
FY 2010 Adopted Budget: $
FY 2010 Yearend Estimate: $ 900,000
l�J
General Fund Expenditures
The General Fund expenditures through June 30, 2010 are illustrated in the following table:
The projected General Fund expenditures at yearend are estimated to come in under prior year
actual and current year budget, as illustrated in the following table:
Department
Budget 09/10
Elected Officials
$ 924,900
Administrative Support
5,815,050
Police
Expended
Fire
Budget
3rd
Year -to-
De artment
09/10
Quarter
Date
Elected Officials
$924,900
$628,152
67.92%
66.85%
Administrative Support
5,815,050
16,325,720
3,887,469
11,967,519
73.30%
Police
15,706,900
10,560,803
67.24%
Fire
Communications Center
2,337,050
1,559,749
66.74%
50.27%
Planning /Building Safety
3,577,850
1,798,655
4,320,743
70.78%
Public Works
6,104,830
4,610,400
3,372,282
73.15%
Recreation and Parks
2,296,450
1,678,127
73.07%
Library
4,128,250
4,386,430
106.25%
Nondepartment
Transfers to Other Funds
501,000
375,687
74.99%
Total General Fund
$62,328,400
44,535,616
71.45%
Ex enditures
The projected General Fund expenditures at yearend are estimated to come in under prior year
actual and current year budget, as illustrated in the following table:
Department
Budget 09/10
Elected Officials
$ 924,900
Administrative Support
5,815,050
Police
16,325,720
Fire
15,706,900
Communications Center
2,337,050
Planning /Building Safety
3,577,850
Public Works
6,104,830
Recreation and Parks
4,610,400
Library
2,296,450
Nondepartment
4,128,250
Transfers to Other Funds
501,000
Total General Fund $ 62
R.xnenditures
Projected
FY 2008-
2009
(Over) Under
$ (Over)
Under 09/10
Year -End
09/10
Actual
PY Actual
Budget
$ 885,977
$ 795,538
$ (90,439)
$ 38,923
5,417,001
5,780,223
363,222
398,049
15,845,235
16,890,996
1,045,761
480,485
13,878,913
15,248,127
1,369,214
1,827,987
2,205,430
1,847,657
(357,773)
131,620
2,609,150
2,796,444
187,294
968,700
5,691,144
5,902,112
210,968
413,686
4,389,578
4,580,155
190,577
220,822
2,097,304
2,171,226
73,922
199,146
5,429,141
5,412,979
(16,162)
(1,300,891)
501,000
1,251,807
750,807
-
727,391 $ 3,378,527
has taken the following measures to reduce expenditures in response to the decrease in
Staff
revenues:
1. Freeze vacant positions — Currently, staff is working with withlnon b non-benefited
temporary
frozen although some critical
Below is a list of frozen position by department:
employees.
Classification
vT
Division
pi
F E
Dept
Project Specialist
J p
Information Systems
1.00
City Manager
Senior Network Assistant
Information Systems
Account Specialist II
Business Services
1.00
1.00
Finance
Accounting Technician
Finance Accounting
1.00
Management Analyst
Fiscal Services
1.00
Assistant Fire Marshal
Fire Prevention
3.00
Fire
Firefighter
Fire Suppression
1.00
Human Resources Human Resources Director
Human Resources
Support Services
1.00
Library Library Assistant
Coordinator (At -will)
RSI
1.00
Planning & Bldg Construction
License/Permit Specialist 11
Building Safety
1.00
Plan Check Engineer
Building Safety
1.00
2.00
Dispatcher 11
Communications Center
1.00
Police
Police Assistant I
Administration
1.00
Police Captain
Administration
4.00
Police Officer
Patrol
Patrol & Safety
1.00
Police Lieutenant
Administration
1.00
Wellness Coordinator
Equipment Fire E ui ment Mechanic
Equipment Maintenance
1.00
Public Works
Public Works Inspector
Engineering
g g
1.00
1.00
Sr. Administrative Specialist
Administration
1.00
Street Maintenance Worker I
fic Safety
Streets/Traffic
Street Maintenance Worker II
Street /Street Services
Wastewater Maint Worker II
Wastewater
1.00
1.00
Recreation Park Maintenance Worker I
Par�era��tion
Gran
31.00
in
2. Union Concessions: Two of the City's labor group °employe reduction
es also
compensation. The unrepresented group of Management/Confidential
agreed to 5% reductions. One labor group has proposed a 6% reduction in compensation.
The remaining labor unions will have reductions through layoffs.
3. Overtime Reductions:
Department's overtime shows a 62% or $900,000
a. As of June 30, 2010, the Fire
reduction when compared to June 30, 2009;
b. As of June 30, 2010, the Police Department's overtime shows a 18% or $100,000
reduction when compared to June 30, 2009;
a zero-
4. Reduction of non - personnel costs. The Fiscal Year 2009/e10 budget included d ersonnel in
growth assumption. In other words, there e no
expenditure accounts for inflation/growth. Despite this fact, departments are still
estimating to end the year below the same period last year:
a. Supplies — YTD costs have decreased 10% or 60,000 compared to June
ed to 0, 20e09;
b. Books and Materials — YTD costs have decreased
2009;
1 �
c. Service Charges, which includes Professional &Technical Services, have
decreased 11.2% or $600,000 compared to June 30, 2 00
The following
is summary of General Fund expenditures by major categories and with 75% of
the year completed most departments are operating well below budget:
Elected Officials and Administrative Su ort Services
The Elected Officials category, which consists of the City Council, City Clerk and City
Treasurer, has expenditures totaling $628,152 or 67.92% of budget.
The Administrative Support category, which includes the City Manager' bffice, Finance and
Human Resources, has expenditures totaling i ch these host sa vngs can be attributed.
currently has a total of 6 vacant positions to h
Public Safetv
olice De artment is projected to come in under budget at yearend, primarily due to cost
The P p
sags s on salaries for unfilled positions. This department cExpenditures June 30v 2 0 as a total Of
positions to which some cost o d n be attributed.
totaled $11,967,519 or 73.30% of budget.
The Fire Department is projected to come in under budget at yearend as well, primarily due to
cost savin s resulting from running down from 1°9 to 14 whenever edepartment currently has a
co g
through June 30, 2010 totaled $10,560,803 or 67.24/0 of budget.
total
of 3 sworn and 1 civilian vacant positions and leave replacements overtime is down 68.6%
and FLSA overtime is down 47.2% compared to the same period last year.
The
Communications Center is projected to come in under budge g t savin recd. be is division
currently has a total of 2 vacant p ositions to which some cos
Expenditures through June 30, 2010 totaled $1,559,749 or 66.74% of budget.
Plannin¢ and Building Safe
655 or 50.27% of the budget. This
Expenditures through June 30, 2010 totaled $1,798, this, in turn
department continues to maximize staffing
when neclessary due r to the uncertain
enables them to more effectively control p applicants. This department is
economic conditions and fluctuation t in the nd This department currently has a total of 2 vacant
projected to come in under budget y
ich some of these cost savings can be attributed.
positions funded by the General Fund to wh
18�
Public Works s, Engineering, Street
Recycling, Wastewater, Storm Drains,
ion's General Fund divisions consist of Government t Buildings, w
This function's Traffic Safety, Solid W the department is below
Services, Street Maintenance, 2010,
or of Jun of budget. This department currently
Equipment Maintenance and Administration. As of June 3 � can be
budget with actual expenditures at $4,320,743 the General Fund to which these cost savings
has a total of 5 vacant positions funded by
attributed.
Recreational Cultural and Information Services includes the Recreation and Parks
The Recreation, Cultural and Information Services function
Department and the Library Department.
For the first nine months of the fiscal year, the Recreation and Parks department ks Division is at
actual expenditures at $3,372,282 or 73.15% of budget. Currently, the
with act p and the Recreation Division is at $1,775,8 2 or 38.43% 8.4 % f
$1,596,460 or 24.43% of budget operating with 3 vacant positions for the mad Y
department has one vacant
budget. This department has been an be attributed. Currently, this dtha remainder of the fiscal
year to which these cost saving
position; it is management's intent to maintain this position
year.
Library Services is expected
to come in below budget and is currently at $1,678,127 ent currently
expenditures realized though the first nine months o� the frigs fiscal
be attributed. The Library
of exp PO to which some of the co 2010.
has one vacant p s of operations beginning in January
Department also reduced their hours /day P
Nondenartment articular
enditures that are not specific to any one p
department is charged with exp y property
This dep es of items budgeted in this department are the liability and p p Y
department. Some of the types promotions, contract costs for
insurance, payoffs of accrued vacation and ick le to, the El Segundo School District, and the
LAX noise abatement, annual cash cont
charges for retirees' participation in the PERS Medical Plan. primarily
t ex enditures are currently projected to come inack that egceededsthe budgeted
Nondepartmen p
due to the exit pay for retirements and vacation/sick leave gees during the 2010 fiscal year:
amount. Below is a summary of cashouts of exit pay
SUMMARY BY DEPARTRe Eee Exit Pay
$ 73,266
Finance 371,495
Police 36,911
Fire 61,444
PBS 141,488
Public Works 40 723
Library 100,797
Human Resources $ 826,123
Summary
With nine months of the fiscal year complete, General Fund expenditures are at 71.45% of
budget and are projected to come in under budget by approximately 5.73 %, or $3,378,500.
However, because of the estimated $6,538,400 shortfall in revenues, the estimated year -end
deficit is approximately $3,159,900.
Currently the City has sufficient General Fund unreserved /undesignated funds available to
accommodate the estimated shortfall of $3, 159,900. However, the City's reserve will end the
year below the fund balance policy of 20% of the General Fund expenditures.
Staff has identified the following potential savings that can be implemented to help bridge the
projected $3.2 million gap through year -end:
Available
Funds Description of Funded Expenditure
$ 320,000 Capital Project savings- reduce transfer from General Fund
$ 1,400,000 Reverse annual funding for Equipment Replacement Funding
$ 87,000 Release ETRC Funding (Projects not started)
$ 600,000 Release funds from Economic Uncertainty Fund designated for FS #2
$ 1,000,000 Sale of Vacant Fire Station #2 Land
Police Savings -- Equipment Replacement Fund deletions - Transfer funds
$ 301,817 to General Fund
$ 72,000 Reduction of overtime savings Communication Center
$ 3,780,817 Total Identified Potential Savings
i 9C�
11. Consideration and possible action regarding the sale of City property
located at 2161 E. El Segundo Boulevard (former Fire Station Number
2) and a determination that the sale of the property is categorically
exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act based on
Environmental Assessment No. 860.
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Manager to enter into a
purchase agreement for the property (2) Alternatively, discuss and take
other possible action related to this item.
STAFF REPORT TO BE DELIVERED UNDER SEPARATE COVER
11
9i
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 17, 2010
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: New Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration of possible action regarding the sale of City property located at 2161 E. El
Segundo Boulevard (former Fire Station Number 2) and a determination that the sale of the
property is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act based on
Environmental Assessment Number 860. (Fiscal Impact: Revenue potential of $1,575,000)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a purchase agreement for the subject
property of not less than $1,575,000; as based upon the sale of a net area of 34,700
square feet of the 40,900 square foot parcel.
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other possible action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Environmental Assessment Number 860
2. 2161 E. El Segundo Property Plot Plan Exhibit
FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue potential of $1,575,000
Amount Budgeted: n/a
Additional Appropriation: n/a
Account Number(s): n/a
ORIGINATED BY: Bill Cro�ssistant City Manager
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manage
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
With the completion and occupancy of the new Fire Station Number 2, the previous facility
located at the northwest corner of Nash Street and El Segundo Boulevard is vacant. The City
Council, at their meeting of March 16, 2010, took action to declare the property surplus and to
notify the appropriate public agencies of their ability to negotiate for its purchase as required by
California law. Shortly thereafter, the City received notification from the Wiseburn School
District that they were interested in the potential purchase of the property. The City has
negotiated in good faith with Wiseburn and it is expected that they will formulate a monetary
offer prior to the consideration of this matter by the City Council at its August 17th meeting.
Additionally, the City has received an offer from a private party, Mr. Brian Sweeny, to purchase
the property for $1,575,000. This amount exceeds the appraised value of the property.
Staff recommends that the City Council direct the City Manager to enter into a purchase
agreement with one of these parties for an amount not less than $1,575,000. It is anticipated that
such a sale could be concluded within a 60 -day period and that these funds could be used to
offset a portion of the projected FY 2010 -2011 budget deficit.
Notice of Exemption
To: ❑ Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
To: ® County Clerk/Registrar /Recorder
County of Los Angeles
12400 E. Imperial Hwy. #1007
Norwalk, CA 90650
Project Title: Environmental Assessment EA -860
Project Location — Specific: 21
From: (Public Agency) City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
APR 2 3 2 � . FILED
PLANNING DIVI ,9IpN, MAR 0 5 2010
Project Location - City:_EI Segundo Project Location - County: Los Angeles
-
1
Description of Project: General Plan Consistency finding for the Droposed disposition of surplus City of El Se undo prope
Pursuant to Government Code §65402. The surplus property in question is the former City of ..El Segundo Fire Station No 2
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of El Segundo
Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project:_City of El Segundo
Exempt Status: (check one)
❑ Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
❑ Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
❑ Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c);
❑ Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: F 15312 (Class 12)
❑ Statutory Exemption. State code number:
Reasons why project is exempt: The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines $15312 makes the sale of
surplus overnment ro ert not located in an area of statewide regional or area wide concern a Class 12 categorical
exemption from additional environmental review. This property does not meet any of the criteria for an area of statewide
regional or area wide concern as identified in CEQA Guidelines $15206 The Surplus Property does not have significant value
for wildlife habitat or other environmental purpose and the use of the Surplus Property has not changed since the time the City
acquired the Surplus Property.
Lead Agency
Contact Person: Masa Alkire Area Code /Telephone /Extension: 310 - 524 -2371
If filed by applicant:
1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project?
YES ❑ NO❑ �.
Sign ature:�,(��,X Q/ZX
Kin-Oerly Christer son
Signed by Lead Agency
❑ Signed by Applicant
Title: AICP, Planning Manager
Date received for filing at OPR:
PAPlanning & Building Safety \0 Planning - Old \PROJECTS (Planning) \851- 875 \EA 860\EA-86 Q,� vard NOE.DOC
In 0037428
o�??i�i�:i'D Ta_RF(``lZRnAI# %L�TN'1 I y
.. Jt �r'�'' d{} �xi�i`1 220
r� y ����,.....,- mac.`.} ,' ,., 'F t • f . $ ;... m ,;., . Y.
LA COUNTY FLOQ ©'G�ITRO
APPROX. 26,500 sf NOT PART
132 sf
f �a& i�g�u •,.fin tm
TI 160'
Paaaaaa-O TA L 4 0 , 9,0 0
W. 4,4 5't�e a
LAI! ,'� , `"Oaa�
I
•� owaaaaaaaaa
� s +assess ®aaaaaaaaaaaa�
} I n c l u d e s Asp � o � + t j i � o � � r i > w � s � � u t b r t e c t to
♦ ®aaf a w� t >�
►���w driveway'ea�s�yetm�ent• 4 (750 s. f.) w
•aaaaaa and excludes parking area
t, s i8^' seas
k a.��°� sa.►. ®a on adjoining parcel (1,500
t' °.• All dimensions are approxim�a)te. -
- Al,�
P LO ��r"Y��� 4:: ♦��' 1
►assess• ♦aa�
�asasaaasaaasaat C w ,
•A a�a�•+D d � � 6 Nxxxoow�','m^1.`. .
101, ............................. _ 17' '�
� w
-!09
J < z + 1 Y s
PUBLIC ,� " i
c> 1 Q1 arc.
WORKS �
E v t tr
o w 1 p w
..r.:4.+.tMaN . � �"h a,, �' Mgai+rtiwr�. .►i ?.•�...
— I _
RI,GHT= `'OF -W 1� Mj,. Atkg��w:
�b�$' day ®�a�a �a►s�►�a°� "�t 14 �a+.
iY
ELSEGU -NO BLVD
Feet (3-0—,70