Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
2008 OCT 21 - CC PACKETAGENDA
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street
The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items.
Any writings or documents given to a majority of the City Council regarding any matter on this agenda that the City
received after issuing the agenda packet, are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office during normal
business hours. Such Documents may also be posted on the City's website at www.elsegundo.org and additional
copies will be available at the City Council meeting.
Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City - related business that is within the
jurisdiction of the City Council and /or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portions of the
Meeting. Additionally, the Public can comment on any Public Hearing item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing
portion of such item. The time limit for comments is five (5) minutes per person.
Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state: Your name and residence and the
organization you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits.
Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City
Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2:00 p.m. the prior Tuesday). The request must
include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. Playing of video tapes
or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days
prior to the meeting and they do not exceed five (5) minutes in length.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact City Clerk, 524 -2305. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to
make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2008 - 5:00 P.M.
Next Resolution # 4573
Next Ordinance # 1425
5:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on
behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to
addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250.
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
None
CLOSED SESSION:
The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown
Act (Government Code Section §54960, et seq.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real
Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation;
and/or discussing matters covered under Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel); and /or
conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators; as follows:
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a) -
-1- matter
City of El Segundo vs. City of Los Angeles, et. al. LASC No. BS094279
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(b): -0- potential case (no
further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government
Code §54956.9(c): -1- matter.
DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957): - 0- matter
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54957.6): - 4- matters
City Negotiators: City Manager Jack Wayt; Human Resources Director Bob Hyland; Finance
Director Deborah Cullen; Richard Kreisler. Employee Organizations: (1) Unrepresented
management/confidential employees (City employees who are not members of bargaining units);
(2) El Segundo Police Officers' Association; (3) El Segundo Firefighter's Association; (4) the El
Segundo Police Management Association.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8): - 0- matter
SPECIAL MATTERS: - 0- matter
2 OU
AGENDA
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street
The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items.
Any writings or documents given to a majority of the City Council regarding any matter on this agenda that the City
received after issuing the agenda packet, are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office during normal
business hours. Such Documents may also be posted on the City's website at www.elsegundo.org and additional
copies will be available at the City Council meeting.
Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City - related business that is within the
jurisdiction of the City Council and /or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portions of the
Meeting. Additionally, the Public can comment on any Public Hearing item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing
portion of such item. The time limit for comments is five (5) minutes per person.
Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state: Your name and residence and the
organization you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits.
Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City
Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2:00 p.m. the prior Tuesday). The request must
include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. Playing of video tapes
or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days
prior to the meeting and they do not exceed five (5) minutes in length.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact City Clerk, 524 -2305. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to
make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2008 - 7:00 P.M.
7:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION — Pastor John Svendsen, First Baptist Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Council Member Don Brann
Next Resolution # 4573
Next Ordinance # 1425
1.
� V .l
PRESENTATIONS
a. Proclamation announcing the Halloween Frolic on Main Street El Segundo, October 31,
2008, from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on
behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to
addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. While all
comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The
Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed.
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda by title
only.
Recommendation — Approval.
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS (PUBLIC HEARING)
1. Consideration and possible action (Public Hearing) regarding the City commissioned
Cost Allocation and Fee Study for City services rendered to the public that was
performed by Revenue and Cost Specialist, LLC (Fiscal Impact: $1,014,875)
Recommendation — (1) Receive public testimony regarding new schedule for service rates,
fees, and charges; (2) Adoption of draft Cost Study Resolution approving proposed new fee
schedule effective January 1, 2009; (3) Approval to increase cost allocation fee schedule
rates on an annual basis of each fiscal year based on the average percentage over the
previous calendar year to the City's cost for administering the services under the City's
proposed fee schedule; (4) Approval of annual cost allocation plan maintenance updates by
Revenue & Cost Specialist LLC; (5) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to
this item.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
4 OU4
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS
2. Consideration and possible action regarding recommendations from the Downtown
Committee to approve the design and specifications for the Downtown El Segundo
way finding signage plan (Fiscal Impact: $110,000.00)
Recommendation — (1) Approve the design and specifications for the Downtown El
Segundo way finding signage plan; (2) Adopt plans and specifications for the Downtown
El Segundo way finding signage plan; (3) Authorize staff to advertise the plan for
competitive bids; (4) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
3. Consideration and possible action regarding the El Segundo Senior Housing Board's
request to initiate the process for Park Vista Senior Housing facility to become smoke
free by January 1, 2010 and for all common areas to be smoke free immediately.
(Fiscal Impact: None)
Recommendation — (1) Consider the item and provide direction to staff; (2) Alternatively
discuss and take other action related to this item.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a call for discussion of
an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business.
4. Warrant Numbers 2568133 to 2568330 on Register No. 1 in the total amount of
$1,097,579.56.
Recommendation — Approve Warrant Demand Registers and authorize staff to release.
Ratify: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or
agreement; emergency disbursements and /or adjustments; and wire transfers.
5. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of October 7, 2008 and Special City Council
Meeting Minutes of October 13, 2008.
Recommendation — Approval.
6. Consideration and possible action regarding the award of a Standard Public Works
Contract to FS Construction for the installation of risers for the Stevenson Field
bleachers at 339 Sheldon St. — Project No. PW 08 -07 (Fiscal Impact: $30,000)
Recommendation — (1) Approve a transfer of $4,000.00 from the Recreation Park Softball
Field Retaining Wall Project (Project Account No. 301 - 400 - 8282 - 8996); (2) Authorize the
City Manager to execute a Standard Public Works Contract in a form approved by the City
Attorney with FS Construction in the amount of $30,000.00; (3) Alternatively, discuss and
take other action related to this item.
�U
7. Consideration and possible action authorizing the City Manager to execute a
Professional Services Agreement with DCA Civil Engineering Group for the Softball
Retaining Wall Design at 339 Sheldon Street — RFP No. 08 -13. (Fiscal Impact:
$28,881
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services
Agreement with DCA Civil Engineering Group in a form approved by the City Attorney in the
amount of $28,881; (2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
8. Consideration and possible action regarding the adoption of Plans and Specifications
and authorization to advertise for bid the renovation of the Human Resources Office
at 350 Main Street — Project No PW 02 -21 (Fiscal Impact: $130,000)
Recommendation — (1) Adopt Plans and Specifications; (2) Authorize staff to advertise the
project for receipt of construction bids; (3) Alternatively, discuss and take other action
related to this item.
9. Consideration and possible action regarding approval of ongoing service agreements
and blanket purchase orders for FY 2008 -2009 in excess of $25,000 and possible
action to waive the formal bidding process and authorize the continued purchase of
gasoline and diesel fuel for City vehicles and equipment through the use of spot
market purchasing for the Public Works Department. (Fiscal Impact: $397,000)
Recommendation — (1) Authorize staff to continue to purchase gasoline and diesel fuel for
City vehicles and equipment through the use of spot market purchasing in an amount not to
exceed $347,000; (2) Authorize the issuance of blanket purchase order to Metron Farnier &
Actaris in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for the purchase of single jet water meters for
the City's water system; (3) Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item.
10. Consideration and possible action regarding the Proposal from Beach Cities Transit
to participate in funding operation for the 109 Line for two years in conjunction with
the Cities of Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach. (Fiscal Impact:
$64,598 for FY 2008 -09 and $72,412 for FY 2009 -10. Two year fiscal impact: $137,010)
Recommendation — (1) City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement
with Beach Cities Transit to continue funding Bus Line 109 for the next two years; (2)
Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item.
6 I'U0
11. Consideration and possible action regarding award of City's professional services
contract for auditing services with Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. for three years
through 2008 -2010, plus optional two year extension. (Fiscal Impact: $265,300; 2008-
2012)
Recommendation: (1) Authorize approval of three year professional services contract for
auditing services with Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. through years 2008 -2010 for $155,140
and optional two year extension for years 2011 and 2012 for $110,160; (2) Alternatively,
discuss and take other action related to this item.
12. Consideration and possible action to extend the City's agreement with Cassidy &
Associates through September 30, 2009 for the provision of legislative advocacy
services in Washington, D.C., and to approve federal advocacy work program
elements. (Fiscal Impact: ($160,000 for FY 2008 -2009)
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the Mayor to execute the attached agreement with
Cassidy & Associates; (2) Approve the federal advocacy work plan as outlined in Cassidy &
Associates Memorandum of September 18, 2008 and City's Homeland Security Needs
Assessment; (3) Instruct the City Manager, affected departments, and our Washington, D.C.
advocate to work with the Congressional staff and local government associations to pursue
the City's federal funding and program objectives; (4) Alternatively, discuss and take other
action related to this item.
13. Consideration and possible action regarding a request from Northrop Grumman to
install two 1,334 square -foot permanent wall signs located at 101 Continental
Boulevard. (Fiscal Impact: None)
Recommendation — (1) Approve Northrop Grumman's request to install two proposed 1,334
square -foot permanent wall signs and adopt a Resolution approving Environmental
Assessment No. 802 and Sign Permit 08 -01; (2) Alternatively, discuss and take other
possible action related to this item.
CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA
F. NEW BUSINESS
G. REPORTS — CITY MANAGER
H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY
7 GUi
I. REPORTS - CITY CLERK
J. REPORTS - CITY TREASURER
K. REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member Brann -
Council Member Fisher -
Council Member Jacobson -
Mayor Pro Tern Busch -
Mayor McDowell -
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have receive value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on
behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to
addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. While all
comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The
Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed.
MEMORIALS -
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government
Code Section §54960, et se q.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator, and /or
conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; andlor discussing matters covered under
Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel); andlor conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators.
REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required)
ADJOURNMENT
8 r U8
POSTED:
DATE:
TIME: 3
NAME:
Lug
r0cla atton
Citp of (el beaunbo, California
WHEREAS, On Friday, October 31St, on the 300 and 400 block of Main Street, The City of El
Segundo Recreation and Parks Department presents El Segundo's ghosties,
scarecrows, and jack -o- lanterns, an annual traditional event that dates back more
than 32years - our annual Halloween Frolic, and
WHEREAS, Festivities begin at 4:00 p.m. and last through the dark -of -night till 7:00 p.m.;
little monsters will scream with glee as they play ghoulish games and climb on
inflatable rides; excited participants of all ages can enter the El Segundo Kiwanis
sponsored fun filled costume contest; the creative creatures can bring their
decorated and carved pumpkins for a ribbon winning critique by the El Segundo
Women's Club; fans of the mystical arts will learn their fate at the fortune telling
booth; and everyone can munch on a multitude of magical morsels while enjoying
live music by the Mark Dayton Borders Band which is guaranteed to lift their
spirits; and
WHEREAS, El Segundo Fire Department will display their engines; El Segundo Police
Department will display their vehicles and both will have staff on hand to meet,
greet, and provide information and giveaways to the little storm - troopers visiting
their areas, as many other city departments are involved in the evening events.
WHEREAS, The annual Halloween Frolic provides residents of El Segundo the opportunity to
experience wholesome, family fun, in a safe environment, while enjoying
downtown Main Street.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Mayor and Members of the City Council of El Segundo, California hereby
proclaim Friday, October 31, 2008, from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., as the Halloween Frolic on Main
Street El Segundo and invite parents, children, and the entire community to participate in this
traditional annual event.
0-L- 0
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 21, 2008
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Special Orders of Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action (Public Hearing) regarding the City commissioned
Cost Allocation and Fee Study for City services rendered to the public that was
performed by Revenue and Cost Specialist, LLC. (Fiscal Impact: $1,014,875)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Receive public testimony regarding new schedule for service rates, fees, and charges.
2) Adoption of draft Cost Study Resolution approving proposed new fee schedule
effective January 1, 2009.
3) Approval to increase cost allocation fee schedule rates on an annual basis of each
fiscal year based on the average percentage over the previous calendar year to the City's
cost for administering the services under the City's proposed fee schedule.
4) Approval of annual cost allocation plan maintenance updates by Revenue & Cost
Specialist LLC.
5) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1) Cost Allocation and Fee Study Summary
2) Draft Cost Study Resolution adopting a new fee schedule for recovering costs incurred
from providing personal choice services.
FISCAL IMPACT: Included in Adopted Budget
Amount Budgeted: $1,014,875
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s):
ORIGINATED BY: Rolf Schleicher, Fiscal Services Manager ,f
REVIEWED BY: Deborah Cullen, Director of Finance
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manal�iw
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
The City had not initiated a comprehensive analysis or increase to fees since 1989. Staff
prepared and circulated a Request for Proposal (RFP) to qualified consulting firms experienced
in the preparation of cost allocation studies and user fee pricing. The purpose of this study was
to identify the actual cost for services and identify the tax subsidy to cover the cost of providing
the services related to planning, building, fire and engineering functions.
r-
IL
Based on the technical expertise of submitted proposals, familiarity with the City, knowledge of
rules and regulations, experience with comparable local agencies, costs, and presentation,
Revenue & Costs Specialist, LLC, was awarded the bid.
The results of the RCS study identified $2,227,564 in tax subsidies and recommended an
increase in fees of $1,934,875. City Council requested that staff review all the proposed fee
increases and ensure that all fees are reasonable and appropriate. Staff reviewed all proposed
fees, and based upon that review, modified various fee categories. The modifications proposed
by staff resulted in fee reductions totaling $282,000. Staff further recommended reducing the
revenue projection by an additional 20% or $254,000 based on the economic conditions relating
to the downturn in housing and commercial development.
Staff recommended implementing the new fee structure beginning January 1, 2009, which
reduced the revenue projections by an additional 25% or $423,000. These reductions total
$959,000; therefore, the total revenue projection for FY 2008 -2009 is $1,014,875.
Implementing fees on January 1, 2009, allows time for communication to residents and the
development community; provides staff needed time to make changes to the software programs
within the City, and meets the minimum 60 -day legal requirement to enact new fees.
Council is requested to consider adoption of the Cost Study Resolution which approves the new
fee schedule. Staff is also recommending annual increases in the fee schedule based on the BLS
CPI -U index. Additionally, Staff requests approval of RCS's annual maintenance service plan to
update administrative cost allocations within the fee schedule.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A NEW FEE SCHEDULE FOR
RECOVERING COSTS INCURRED FROM PROVIDING
VARIOUS PUBLIC SERVICES.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of El Segundo as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds as follows:
A. The City Council may establish fees for services under various provisions
of California law including, without limitation, Business & Professions
Code § 16000; Government Code §§ 36936.1, 43000, 54344, 65104,
65456, 65874, 65909.5, 65943, 66013, 66014, 66451.2; and Health &
Safety Code §§ 510, 17951, 17980.1, 19852.
B. Pursuant to Government Code § 66016, the City made data available
regarding the cost, or estimated cost, of providing services for various
fees ten (10) days before the public hearing held on October 21, 2008.
C. On October 21, 2008, City Council heard public testimony and considered
evidence in a public hearing held and noticed in accordance with
Government Code § 66016.
D. At the recommendation of the City's Departments and the City Manager,
the City Council believes that it is in the public interest to establish the
recommended fees to recover the costs of public services.
SECTION 2: The Fees, attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated into this Resolution as
if fully set forth, are approved and adopted.
SECTION 3: Unless otherwise revised, the fees established by this Resolution will be
automatically adjusted on an annual basis at the beginning of each fiscal year based on
the average percentage change over the previous calendar year to the City's costs for
administering the services set forth in Exhibit "A." The first fee adjustment cannot be
made before a minimum of ten (10) months after the effective date of this Resolution.
SECTION 4: This Resolution is exempt from review under the California Environmental
Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21000, et seq.; "CEQK) and CEQA regulations
(Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14, §§ 15000, et seq.) because it establishes, modifies, structures,
restructures, and approves rates and charges for meeting operating expenses;
purchasing supplies, equipment, and materials; meeting financial requirements; and
obtaining funds for capital projects needed to maintain service within existing service
�: 1L ;i
areas. This Resolution, therefore, is categorically exempt from further CEQA review
under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14, § 15273.
SECTION 5: Pursuant to Government Code § 66017, all fees related to the Planning
and Building Safety Department set forth in this Resolution will become effective on
January 1, 2009 and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded.
SECTION 6: For all other fees, this Resolution will become effective on January 1,
2009 and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded.
SECTION 7: The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution;
will enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City; and will make a
minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the record of proceedings of the City
Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and
adopted.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of September 2008.
Kelly McDowell,
Mayor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
1, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of the City is five; that the foregoing
Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council,
approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said
City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of September 2008,
and the same was so passed and adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Cindy Mortesen,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
A
Karl H. Berger
Assistant City Attorney
G,LJ
Fee Study Summary
Schedule- Exhibit A
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE SUMMARY REPORT
FY 2008 -09
WFERENCEiT77 CITY SERVICE CITY PROPOSED FEE
PLANNING 5tHVIt:tb
ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT
$3,345 per application /$1,670 per application (50% fee) for
S -001
properties in the Downtown Specific Plan Area
S -002
MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
$3,345 per application /$1,670 per application (50% fee) for
properties in the Downtown Specific Plan Area
S -003
MAJOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
$6,855 per application/$3,425 per application (50% fee) for
properties in the Downtown Specific Plan Area
S -004
ARCHITECTURAUDESIGN REVIEW
$450 per application /$225 per application (50% fee) for
properties in the Downtown Specific Plan Area
S -005
VARIANCE REVIEW
$6,855 per application
S -006
ADJUSTMENT REVIEW
$2,570 per application/$1,285 per application (50% fee) for
fence height adjustment on properties in the R -1, R -2 and R -3
S -007
ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT /ZONE CHANGE
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -008
PRE - APPLICATION REVIEW
$3,410 per application.
This fee gets the applicant two meetings with staff. Half of this
fee will be credited towards any future fees for this project.
S -009
TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -010
OFF -SITE PARKING COVENANT
$300 per application
S -011
PARKING DEMAND /SHARED PARKING STUDY
$3,285 per study plus actual costs for Traffic Engineer
S -012
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -013
SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -014
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -015
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AMENDMENT
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -016
ANNEXATION REQUEST REVIEW
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -017
CFD ANNEXATION REQUEST REVIEW
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -018
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -019
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
$770 per application
S -020
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REV
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
10/16/2008
Fee Study Summary
Schedule- Exhibit A
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE SUMMARY REPORT
FY 2008 -09
REFERENCE #
CITY SERVICE
CITY PROPOSED FEE
S -021
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
In House:
New:
Single -Use Residential - $750 Single -Use Commercial -
$1,500
Single -Use Industrial - $1,500
Two -Use Mixed - $2,000 Three Use Mixed - $2,500
Amendment:
Sin le -Use Pro'ect - 250 Two -Use Protect- Three Use -
S -022
SMOKY HOLLOW FLOATING ZONE PROC.
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -023
SMOKY HOLLOW SITE PLAN
$2,060 per application - < 15,000 square feet
$4,180 per application - >= 15,000 square feet
S -024
DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT REVIEW
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -025
ENVIRON. CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
$130 per application
S -026
ENWRON INITIAL STUDY /NEG DEC /RECIR
$3,545 per application if prepared only by City staffJDeposit
determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly
rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract
costs.
S -027
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REVIEW
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -028
MITIGATION MONITORING
Minor - $465 per project
Major - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully
allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside
or contract costs.
S -029
PRECISE PLAN MODIFICATION REVIEW
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -030
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP REVIEW
$4,475 per map
(Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by
the applicant)
S -031
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP REVIEW
$4,845 per map plus $370 per lot for every lot over 5
(Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by
the applicant)
S -032
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP REVIEW
$4,845 per map plus $370 per lot for every lot over 5
(Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by
the applicant)
S -033
RESUBMITTED MAP REVIEW
$1,135 per ma
S -034
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
$1,365 per application
S -035
LOT MERGER
$1,365 per a lication
S -036
REVERSION TO ACREAGE
$5,245 per application
S -037
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE REVIEW
$1,510 per application
S -038
RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT
$1,345 per application plus actual costs for City Attorney
S -039
CC &R REVIEW
$1,350 per application plus actual costs for City Attorney
10/16/2008
1.1 i
Fee Study Summary
Schedule- Exhibit A
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE SUMMARY REPORT
FY 2008 -09
REFERENCE #
CRY WRYIGE
CITY PROPOSED FEE
S -040
HISTORIC RESOURCE NOMINATION REVIEW
$7,195 per a lication
S 041
ADMIN DETERMINATION - DIR DECISION
$1,110 per application
S -042
ADMIN DETERMINATION - PC DECISION
$1,650 per application
S -043
SIGN PLAN REVIEW
$110 per application
S -044
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM
Minor - $580 per application
Major - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully
allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside
or contract costs.
S -045
LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE PERMIT
$220 per application plus $100 if a public hearing is requested.
S-046
MOVED BUILDING SITE PLAN REVIEW
$1,030 per application
S -047
]TIME
ZONING CONFORMANCE LETTER/REVIEW
$745 per letter
S -048
MODIF. TO DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL
$3,250 per application
S -049
EXTENSION REVIEW
$1,255 per application
S -050
APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Resident - $1,100 per appeal for 50% cost recovery
Non - Resident - $2,200 per appeal for 100% cost recovery
S -051
APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Resident - $1,550 per appeal for 50% cost recovery
Non - Resident - $3,100 per appeal for 100% cost recovery
Inside the Coastal Appeal Zone - No Charge per State law
S -052
STREET ADDRESS CHANGE
$545 per application
S -053
GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE
10% of all Building & Safety permit fees
S -054
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
$745 per application /No fee for special events (including block
parties) on properties in the R -1, R -2, and R -3 Zones.
S -055
ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT
$670 per a lication
S -056
ADULT USE PLANNING PERMIT
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -057
AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT
$110 per a lication
S -058
ANIMAL PERMIT
$340 per application
S -059
ANIMAL PERMIT RENEWAL
$170 per renewal
S -060
ANIMAL PERMIT APPEAL
Resident - $805 per appeal for 50% cost recovery
Non - Resident - $1,610 per appeal for 100% cost recovery
S -061
BUSINESS ZONING CLEARANCE
Home Occupation - $110 per application
Other Businesses - $55 per application
S -062
PUBLIC NOTICING
$120 per notice or deposit with actual costs, at the discretion of
City staff.
f` �? 10/16/2008
'i3
Fee Study Summary
Schedule- Exhibit A
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE SUMMARY REPORT
FY 2008 -09
REFERENCE :# I CITY SERVICE CITY PROPOSED FEE
CMniMCCOiMrn CCo\ /ICCC
S -063
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
House Sewer Lateral Connection to Existing Sewer Main - $225
House Sewer Conenction to Existing Sewer Lateral - $145
S -064
EXCAVATION PERMIT
Permit Issuance - $30
Inspection - $2.85 per linear foot of excavation or trench with a
minimum of $140
Plan Check - $300
plus performance bond at a level determined by City staff
S -065
UTILITY STREET CUT PERMIT
Permit Issuance - $30
Inspection - $2.85 per linear foot of excavation or trench with a
minimum of $140
Plan Check - $300
plus performance bond at a level determined by City staff
S -066
ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -067
STREET CLOSURE REVIEW
$215 per application
S -068
NEWSRACK PERMIT
New - $105 per newsrack
Annual Renewal - $50 per newsrack
S -069
NEWSRACK IMPOUNDMENT
$90 per newsrack + $5 per day for storage
S -070
FINAL PARCEL MAP CHECK
$665 per map
(Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by
the applicant)
S -071
FINAL TRACT MAP PLAN CHECK
$1.565 or Actuals on 10 or greater lots.
S -072
FINAL MAP AMENDMENT
$155 per application
(Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by
the applicant)
S -073
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK
Percent of Construction Valuation:
$04100,000 - 3%
$100,0014500,000 - 2% of the construction value over
$100,000
$500,001+ - 1 % of the construction value over $500,000
S -074
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION
Percent of Construction Valuation:
$0- $100,000 - 1.5%
$100,001-$500,000 - 1% of the construction value over
$100,000
$500,001+ - 0.5% of the construction value over $500,000
S -075
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION ISSUANCE
$1,505 per application
S -076
RECORD OF SURVEY PLAN CHECK
$382.50 per plan
S -077
EASEMENT PROCESSING
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -078
QUITCLAIM REVIEW
None
S -079
SURETY & SUBORDINATION REVIEW
$382 per plan
S -080
LIEN REMOVAL
$155 per lien
S -081
DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEW
Minor - $460
Major - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully
allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside
or contract costs.
S -082
STOCKPILE /BORROW SITE PLAN CHECK
$340 per plan
S -083
MINOR PLAN CHECK REVISION
$305 per sheet
S -084
STREET NAME CHANGE
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
10/16/2008
i�
L' i
Fee Study Summary
Schedule- Exhibit A
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE SUMMARY REPORT
FY 2008 -09
REFERENCE 8
CITY SERVICE
CITY PROPOSED FEE
S -085
ALLEY /STREET VACATION REVIEW
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -086
ASSESS. DISTRICT FORMATION RESEARCH
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -087
CITY PROPERTY ACQUISITON PROC.
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -088
WIDE & OVERLOAD PERMIT
Daily - $16 per permit
Annual - $90 per permit
Fees are set by State Law.
S -089
BLUEPRINT COPY SERVICE
In House - $2.50
Outside - Actual Costs
l Jk- 0 10/16/2008
Fee Study Summary
Schedule- Exhibit A
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE SUMMARY REPORT
FY 2008 -09
ENCE # I CITY SERVICE CITY PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING SAFETY SERVICES
S -090
IBUILDING PLAN CHECK SERVICES
See Schedules B -1 and B -2, Attached
S -091
IBUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES
See Schedules B -1 and B -2, Attached
S -092
MAP /PLAN /FILE SCANNING SERVICES
$1.20 per sheet -8 1/2" x 11"
$1.80 per sheet -larger
10/16/2008
Fee Study Summary
Schedule- Exhibit A
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE SUMMARY REPORT
FY 2008 -09
REFERENCE Of I CITY SERVICE CITY PROPOSED FEE
FIRE SERVICE5
S -093
ANNUAL BUSINESS FIRE INSPECTION
100,000 - 499,999 square feet - $650
500,000 - 5,000,000 square feet - $1,300
S -094
ANNUAL BUSINESS FIRE REINSPECTION
100,000 - 499,999 square feet - $200
500,000 + square feet - $400
S -095
ANNUAL FIRE PERMIT
$95 per permit
S -096
TEMPORARY FIRE PERMIT
$505 per permit
S -097
FIRE HIGH RISE INSPECTION
$1.02 per 100 square feet
S -098
FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECK/INSPECT.
Valuation based on Tables in Appendix B of this Report
These revenues should be in separate revenue accounts.
S -099
FIRE ALARM PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION
Valuation based on Tables in Appendix B of this Report
These revenues should be in separate revenue accounts.
S -100
FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM PC/INSP
Valuation based on Tables in Appendix B of this Report
These revenues should be in separate revenue accounts.
S -101
FIRE PROTECTION TESTING
$465 per system
S -102
STATE MANDATED FIRE INSPECTION
$125 per inspection
S -103
SPECIAL FIRE EQUIP INSP /APPROVAL
$775 per r uest plus any outside costs
S -104
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSP. PROGRAM
Range I - $382
Range II - $428
Range III - $564
S -105
CHEMICAL ACCIDENT RELEASE PREV PROG
100 -1,000 Pounds:
1 chemical - $1,370 2 chemicals - $1,825 3+ chemicals -
$2,280
1,000 - 10,000 Pounds:
1 chemical - $1,480 2 chemicals - $2,055 3+ chemicals -
$2,735
10,000+ Pounds:
S -106
HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR PERMIT
Smalll (6 -19 employees) - $800
Intermediate (20 -100 employees) - $1,100
Advanced (101 -500 employees) - $1,600
Permit By Rule - $1,300
Conditional Authorization - $1,000
Conditionally Exempt - $125
Large Quantity Generator - $125
S -107
NEW INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT /INSPECT
New Permit Application: Sewer - $480 Off -Site - $480 On -Site -
$935
New Sewer Plan: 112 - $570 314 - $800 5/6 - $1,255
New On -Site Plan: 1/2 - $725 3/4 - $1,010 5/6 - $1,580
New Off -Site Plan: 1/2 - $625 3/4 - $875 5/6 - $1,370
Closure Inspection
S -108
REVISED INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT /INS
Revise Permit Application - $230
Revise Sewer Plan:
1/2 - $440 3/4 - $610 5/6 - $950
Revise On -Site Plan:
1/2 - $550 3/4 - $760 5/6 - $1,180
Revise Otf -Site Plan:
1/2 - $440 3/4 - $610 5/6 - $950
S -109
INDUSTRIAL WASTE ANNUAL INSPECTION
Class 1 - $244
Class 2 - $488
Class 3 - $732
Class 4 - $976
Class 5 - $1,220
Class 6 - $2,928
S -110
UNDERGROUND TANK PERMIT
Annual Permit Maintenance - $770 plus $140 for each add'I tank
n
l 10/16/2008
Fee Study Summary
Schedule- Exhibit A
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE SUMMARY REPORT
FY 2008 -09
REFERENCE #
CITY SERVICE
CITY PROPOSED FEE
S -111
ABOVE GROUND LIQUID TANK INSPECTION
0- 10,000 gallon - $62.50
10,001 - 100,000 gallon - $125
100,001,000,000 gallons - $250
1,000,001 + 10,000,000 gallons - $1,000
10,000,001 - 100,000,000 gallon - $5,000
100,000,001+ gallon - $18,750
S -112
REVIEW OF RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
S -113
FIRE STORMWATER INSPECTION
Restaurant - $165
Automotive - $165
1 Acre - $200
2 -5 Acres - $235
More than 5 Acres - $330
S -114
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved
plus any outside or contract costs.
S -115
NEW CONSTR. FIRE RE- INSPECTION
Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel
involved plus any outside or contract costs.
S -116
AFTER -HOURS FIRE INSPECTION
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated
hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or
contract costs.
10/16/2008
Fee Study Summary
Schedule- Exhibit A
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
FEE SUMMARY REPORT
FY 2008 -09
RERMNIX 8 1 CITY SERVICE CITY PROPOSED FEE
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
S -117
NEW BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING
$40 per application
S -118
BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL PROCESSING
$40 per renewal
S -119
FILM PERMIT PROCESSING
Permit Application Fee - $640
Revision /Rider - $175
Public Right -of -Way Usage - $750 per day per location
Police Personnel - Actual Costs
Fire Personnel - Actual Costs
Public Works Personnel - Actual Costs
S -120
COPY SERVICE
First 5 copies - No Charge
Each additional copy - $0.20 per copy
S -121
DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION
$3 per document
S -122
VIDEO /AUDIO COPYING
$10 per tape /disk
S -123
INITIATIVE PROCESSING
$200 per application
Fee is limited by State Law
1 it 10/16/2008
m
W
J
t]
W
U
U)
W
J
W
U
to
W to
O W W
lL
>- LL
Z t-
::) W1_-
LL
Lij Q cc
in to W
JCaa
uj
LL Z Z
0�0
_J J_
— > >
U m m
0
W
U) W
OW
w
CL
n.
H
of w
U_
U
W
U�
W
U)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O U) 0 0 0 0 0 O
O�NUAOSOO
69 N O O O
> 69 69 _ to O
O N 69 60 �
0 O O O > >
60 , L o o S 0 O
0
m6qr.�: o00
O L 69 69 a-- O
U L L 69 r'
to m (U0 w U U
O � 0) N m t0 L
w o O L- m
64a°000 °Oo
+ ocovo0.�
00 N (O
�6^9 6�9 't CM 6s
+ + + N9+
+ + O
�CO000 CO
69 N 1: CO CO 11:
O000r- -M
69 fA ti N N
69 N
69
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
otn000ppp000
69 � 661%04 S
> - 4044 — to O
O m 69 K
o _0 O O O > >
O O O 4�
EAC 0000po O
Jr- � 0 0 0 O
69 r r o 0
O L 69 69 vk
69 69
U LL 'r-
cc r
O U U L L 69
0) N l0 U U
N 01 01 W m V
69,0 L 0) m
+ w 0 0)
U) 609 0 0 w
u-+ untn0L-) °
�609(AM '+"s
1 --+ + 64 O N
N O + to 69
U1 U) O tT +
04 M M O
r O O _ U)
� Cl)
to
M
69
C
O
C O
O
C N C
O
O _ O O O> W
C 0 t0 7 w> O
>> 00 m
m ' > $ >
>> O S O 00 C 0
$go0Ln —o
0 to(n�1(ss
W S O N69 60
69 op�
d69E169 00SO�
0 0) OOOpO
Z'apt� 6tf)OSO N
0 69669669wk64�0
D
Qaaaaaaaa°1
H c c c c c c c c
Z_5v5zzzzzz
m m m m m m m m
W
w
0 0 0 0 0 0
08055000
00000000
O6q NtA000O
69 N to O O O
> " 69 69 � W O
O 01 6H 69
O O > > m 0 �
O O O O >> m
S
O 8 O O O
L C Ct 0 0 0
0 cl C. O
0) r-
0 L L 69 d9
m m w U U
N O 0) 0) (p
o o o 0
69 °v O o °
+ "i rnt-- 00
69 W%
N O O + + 69
69 N t` O O +
r CC t` t- O
U) et M M F-
N CO N (.'j
69 69 M N N
6A � —
69 N
69
O O pp O O O
�? S O S pp 0 0 0
ti64 N L6 O c; 6
-(AN to 000
69 69 to O
C 0) L 6f! 69
O O > > N N
O_ O O O > >
x 0 0 0 O O O
V 0 0 0 S O
N 0 L6969� O
U L L 4w
-:
01 U U L L 69
r a..
0 01 t6 (0
+ "••• O O m
0t0ntntn00
t o aa N N O
h CM fV t` U� U)
69 + 69 69 — — N
6
S (0 � 9 + + 69
N t` P,.� ^ U7
69 O O O) tl-
N
69 M O COO
69
69
69
c
C O
C O 0 (0
C
p U lC 7 t0 O
c «. f0 7 > N
lL9 O m > O 0 >
7 >
U >0S000o_0o
W >OgoSt0o_0
U
O ui to 69 69
(On $
m 04S.'
Z �' to 40°
°:o o o o s�
700O
�o0uio00 m
:) boto6696� 9
966690
Z Y .]C Y Y .Y Y Y Y
D U U U U U U U U
Qaaaan.aaa
rnrnrnrnrntrrnrn
F- c c c c c c c c
Wv'v�avvv'v
Fnmmmmmmmm
W
w
aLl 0.
J
L
t
I
W
W
J
W
U
m
W
J
W
U
W
W
O LL.
ZFF--W ui
(� L
Lij Q
(n (1) W
Jasa
(Wizz
O p p
J_ J
U m m
0
W
c
O W
a W
O U-
ly
a
F-
z
u
U
W
U
W
N
0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O Q O O O
0 to O 000
t64 N(f)0000
> �10V9
O
8)00 > >' -
00 0 8 0 0 O
Vi 40
O l4 U U L v 0 V9
r- y (0 03 U L
c° 0 o o` d m
() O "- O O `
�+ 000. N (D O
r O 60 c O
C-4 v% + (D
�G � + c)N + 6,9
64 N NN N +
Oi 0
aihOaiN
0d �EA� 0
Vi M Go
6,9 Vj
6A
N
CN
m40N(OA 000
>
6S, W3, tn0
pO m - - 60 6m.
0 0 0 0 >
L 0 0 0 0 O
r
0) .0
60 -
,C ELA .-
0 m N lUC U UV3.
M m O l0 W V
"-_O _O . y
N N9 6,9 60 (O O
+ + + Cl)
+
)
CO t U) w co co
V9 6,9 00 O w
649, � 00
C
C O
C O 0N
> C
C O
fn m
f0 7 > (6
(c CD CL :3o C; o
O O O (6)
(9 p IA )(9
ZW) (A , , p��
�� �
0
� 0 0060
m r g O o g g
m
ED C 100 N N (A r- in >
J 696060603, 64600
H
LLICLMaaaaaa-
o a,m0)�� 0 0)
Fn v� v v v v .9 v
O
z
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0800 0 0 0 0
00000
OC4 N6 0000
MM NfANtAO �0
6,9 V9
0 >
> > > 0 040
0 O
L O O O o 0
U O O o
U L L FA
p (0 U U L L V►
w 0 m W U U
O m N 4) m
O O m
uiOr..r- O O
60 r- c) a) w w `
+ N (D O --t CD w
N (C r N M
0EA� --a)6zA
(D + 6,9 60 60 40 ui
M + + + + 60
6-31 CI O N �'t 'Q O
N 0 V) 00 (P 't
V9(O 6oNa,
09 r ' IA O
6,940600
60
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O (A 0 0 0 0 0 0
tm 460 N )n 0 0 0
> , 6,9 6A in O
O 4) l0 V!
> 4) 4)
O > > 0 0 `
ppp O O > > tD
0 0 0 pp 0 0
L 0 0 0 9 0
�6,9_ r-OO Ct O
N L�Vi� r-O
60 6,9
r
O R) U L L V!
N 4) N (6 N U
(D O 0 0 N
co O O L y
(D
00
+ O O N O CO w
O _M O � '7 N
0 � 603, 69
69
�
0 + +
p to ti M M
r N CO M , (.i
6,9 � 60 CM 'T O
d
V9
C
C O
r
C O j C
p 0 N 7 (d O
O Q> 7
W N (0 > CD CD o>�
= 7 2> 0 0$ 0 0
U > >C 0 o O
z o$oo(n —o
0 O in Lo - 60 60 0
V9 N i- O p r
Ur ` 69 .- O O O 0 6,9
z m 0 0 0 0 0
Q C (A N N E- 0>
J
ml, 606,96%606%0
U U U U U U U -.x
m L L L L L L L L
<00000000
z m ( te a m (tea m m m
wmmmmmmmm
Z m m m m m m m m
O
z
0b
ei
C�
S33d IlYM3d EJNloiin8
31n(13HOS 33d A13 -AVS 2 ONIcnins
6-9 31nG3HOS OONnE)3S 13:10 AlIO
i� r r� i � � � � m m s m m m m m r
elea ApnOH jeln6a8 ayl ;o %OZL s! al" ApnOH ewli,en0
ales{ ApnOH 10
alea ApnOH 10
ae3 me!Aea ueld leln6ei of uol3!ppe ui melAaa ueld pal!padx3
eleb ApnOH
elea ApnOH
melAad ueld leuolllppy
ale2i ApnoH 10
ele8 AIjnoH 10
(wnw!u!w jnoy 1,) uoledsul ew9Jen0
ales ApnOH
ales ApnOH
pagpeds lou suolloedsul Je410
0 ;o 0 leu!3 {o ow1i le pepunlei 3!sodep 000'Ol$ + E£E$
00'0$
AouednooO ;o eleoy13JaO tiejodwel
0013
00'0$
Aouednoo0 ;o eleogpoC) aleolldnQ
00' 2$
00'0$
pueO uolloedsul aleolldnp
:snO3NY1130SIlN
8e3 Wuad 6ulpl!n8 a4i ;o %8
3!wJad leolueyoayy
aed *w9d 6u!pl!n8 a43 bo %9
WUJOd 6ulgwnld
e93 3!uuad 6ulpl!ng ayl to %8
3lwJed hp10e13
:(le!lueplsea Allwe3 e16ulS of selldde Aluo) SlMb3d OSVYOO
33d
33d
30MOS
03SOdONd
1N3bwo
S33d IlYM3d EJNloiin8
31n(13HOS 33d A13 -AVS 2 ONIcnins
6-9 31nG3HOS OONnE)3S 13:10 AlIO
i� r r� i � � � � m m s m m m m m r
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
SCHEDULE B -2
Current Fee RCS F Proposed City Proposed Fee
Permit Issuance
$15.00
$28.00
No Change to proposed
Supplemental Permit Issuance
$15.00
$21.00
No Change to proposed
Residential Appliances, up to 1 hp
$4.00
$28.00
$14.00 (SFR)
Non - Residential Appliances, up to 1 hp
$8.00
$28.00
No Change to proposed
Electrical Sign
$15.00
$133.00
No Change to proposed
Power Apparatus (Ratings in HP, KW, KVA, or KVAR
up to 5
$6.50
$114.00
$75.00
5 -20
$10.00
$114.00
$75.00
21-50
$15.00
$114.00
$75.00
51-100
$33.00
$114.00
$75.00
100+
$50.00
$188.00
No Change to proposed
Temporary Power Pole
$20.00
$37.00
No Change to proposed
Services, Switchboards, Control Centers, & Panels
up to 600 volts
up to 200 amps
SFR
$12.00
$56.00
$28.00 (SFR)
Non -SFR
$12.00
$133.00
No Change to proposed
201 -400 amps
SFR
$20.00
$56.00
$28.00 (SFR)
Non -SFR
$20.00
$133.00
No Change to proposed
401 -1,200 amps
$36.00
$315.00
No Change to proposed
over 1,200 amps
$45.00
$315.00
No Change to proposed
greater than 600 volts
$60.00
$342.00
No Change to proposed
Switchboards
First Section Standing Panel
$35.00
N/A
No Change to proposed
Additional Sections
$30.00
N/A
No Change to proposed
Page 1 of 6
ay J
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
SCHEDULE B -2
Current Fee RCS Fee Proposed City proposed Fee
Over 600 Volt Section
$60.00
N/A
No Change to proposed
Additional Sections
$55.00
N/A
No Change to proposed
Receptacle, Switch, and Lighting Outlet, per fixture
$0.50
$7.00
$3.50 (SFR)
Lighting Fixture, per fixture
$0.50
$7.00
$3.50 (SFR)
Pole or Platform Mounted Fixtures, per fixture
$3.00
$19.00
No Change to proposed
Swimming Pool
$0.00
$111.00
$55.50 (SFR)
Meter Change
$0.00
$37.00
No Change to proposed
Miscellaneous Conduits and Conductors (per 100 linear feet
$0.00
$28.00
$30.00
Inspections not specified
Hourly Rate
Hourly Rate
No Change to proposed
Reinspections
Hourly Rate
Hourly Rate
No Change to proposed
After Hours Inspection (4 hour minimum)
OT Hourly Rate
OT Hourly Rate
No Change to proposed
Overtime Hourly Rate is 120% of the Regular Hourly Rate
Page 2 of 6
P4 e,
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
PLUMBING PERMITS
SCHEDULE B -2
Current Fee RCS Fee Proposed City Proposed Fee
Pcarmit Issuance $15.00 $28.00 No Change to proposed
Supplemental Permit Issuance
$15.00
$21.00
No Change to proposed
Plumbing Fixtures and Vents
SFR
$10.00
$11.00
No Change to proposed
Non -SFR
$10.00
$27.00
No Change to proposed
Repair or Alteration of Drainage or Vent Piping
$5.00
$28.00
$14.00 (SFR)
Grease Interceptor
$25.00
$237.00
$125.00
Piping
Single Family Residential (per dwelling unit)
$8.00
$37.00
$18.50 (SFR)
Multi Family Residential (per dwelling unit
$8.00
$114.00
Reie
Single Family Residential (per dwelling unit)
$8.00
$56.00
$28.00 (SFR)
Multi Family Residential (per dwelling unit
$8.00
$56.00
Lawn Sprinklers, Vacuum Breakers, and Backflow Protection Dev.
Each Lawn Sprinkler System per Valve
$5.00
$9.00
No Change to proposed
Each Vacuum Breaker or Backflow Protection Device
$5.00
$9.00
No Change to proposed
Backflow Protection Device greater than 6"
$25.00
$167.00
No Change to proposed
Gas System
For Each System
Less than 2"
$15.00
$56.00
$28.00 (SFR)
2" or more
$50.00
$133.00
No Change to proposed
For Each Outlet over 5
$3.00
$11.00
$5.50 (SFR)
Water Heater
$8.00
$28.00
$14.00 (SFR)
Solar Water Heating system
$15.00
$56.00
$28.00 (SFR)
Sewer
0 -25 linear feet
$15.00
$28.00
No Change to proposed
each additional 100 linear feet
$0.00
$28.00
No Change to proposed
Swimming Pool
$75.00
$83.00
No Change to proposed
In- Ground Spa
$30.00
$37.00
No Change to proposed
Page 3 of r 1 L4
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO SCHEDULE B -2
BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
Pool /Spa Heater
$0.00
$28.00
No Change to proposed
Miscellaneous
$30.00
$56.00
No Change to proposed
Inspections not specified
Hourly Rate
Hourly Rate
No Change to proposed
Reinspections
Hourly Rate
Hourly Rate
No Change to proposed
After Hours Inspection (4 hour minimum)
OT Hourly Rate
OT Hourly Rate
No Change to proposed
Overtime Hourly Rate is 120% of the Regular Hourly Rate
Page 4 of 6 q
a �-
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
MECHANICAL PERMITS
SCHEDULE B -2
Current Fee RCS PFrooposed City Proposed Fee
Permit Issuance
$15.00
$28.00
No Change to proposed
Supplemental Permit Issuance
$15.00
$21.00
No Change to proposed
Forced -Air or Gravity -Type Furnace or Burner
$8.00
$47.00
$23.50 (SFR)
Floor Furnace - Installation or Relocation
$8.00
$37.00
$18.50 (SFR)
Suspended /Recessed Wall /Floor Mounted Heater -
Install /Reloc
$8.00
$37.00
No Change to proposed
Fireplace
$8.00
$76.00
$38.00 (SFR)
Appliance Vents per each Inlet/Outlet
$5.00
$13.00
$6.50 (SFR)
Air Handling Units
SFR
$15.00
$56.00
$28.00 (SFR)
Non -SFR
$15.00
$133.00
$75.00
Single Register Ventilation Fan
$5.00
$9.00
No Change to proposed
Independent Venting System
$14.00
$37.00
No ro to Change 9 proposed
Hood served by Mechanical Exhaust
$8.00
$133.00
No Change to proposed
Boilers, Compressors, and Absorption Systems
0 -3 HP or 0- 100,000 Btu/h
$25.00
$114.00
$75.00
3 -15 HP or 100,001 - 500,000 Btu/h
$25.00
$133.00
$75.00
15 -30 HP or 500,001- 1,000,000 Btu/h
$25.00
$237.00
$100.00
30 -50 HP or 1,000,001 - 1,750,000 Btu/h
$35.00
$342.00
$125.00
50+ HP or 1,750,001+ Btu/h
$75.00
$447.00
$150.00
Incinerator /Kiln
$0.00
$56.00
No Change to proposed
Alteration to Duct Work not otherwise noted
$10.00
$4.00
$10.00
Miscellaneous
$30.00
$56.00
No Change to proposed
Inspections not specified
Hourly Rate
Hourly Rate
No Change to proposed
Page 5 of 6
2qh
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
MECHANICAL PERMITS
SCHEDULE B -2
Current Fee RCS Fee Proposed City Proposed Fee
Reinspections
Hourly Rate
Hourly Rate
No Change to proposed
After Hours Inspection (4 hour minimum)
OT Hourly Rate
OT Hourly Rate
No Change to proposed
Overtime Hourly Rate is 120% of the Regular Hourly Rate
Page 6 of 6
�kt
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 21, 2008
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Boards and Commissions
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding recommendations from the Downtown
Committee to approve the design and specifications for the Downtown El Segundo way
finding signage plan. (Fiscal Impact: $110,000.00)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Approve the design and specifications for the Downtown El Segundo way finding
signage plan.
2) Adopt plans and specifications for the Downtown El Segundo way finding signage
plan.
3) Authorize staff to advertise the plan for competitive bids.
4) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Wayfinding Signage Bid and Specifications developed by Ryder Communications.
FISCAL IMPACT: Included in Adopted Budget
Amount Budgeted: $110,000.00
Additional Appropriation: No
Account Number(s): 001- 400 - 2901 -6201
l
ORIGINATED BY: Lauren Mahakian, Senior Administrative Anal
REVIEWED BY: Dana Greenwood, Public Works Director-\-)i��R
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
In May 2008, the City Council approved the Downtown Committee's recommendation to
develop a plan for the design, fabrication and placement of Downtown El Segundo way
finding signage. The intent of this plan is to create attractive signage that directs visitors
from the main thoroughfares that pass through El Segundo into the downtown business
area. Specific attention is focused on Sepulveda Blvd., Imperial Hwy., El Segundo Blvd.,
and Vista del Mar, as the principal high volume traffic corridors.
The proposed signage plan consists of 57 signs including; four (4) Welcome to
Downtown El Segundo signs, 44 directional signs, and nine (9) public parking signs.
Signs will mount to 4" diameter aluminum poles, except where existing light poles are
available.
Welcome signs will be located at the four main entrances to Downtown El Segundo:
Main Street at El Segundo Blvd., Grand Ave. at Concord, Main St. at Mariposa, and
Grand Ave. at Eucalyptus. Each of these signs will be 4 feet in width and will sit 10 feet
in height from the ground in a visible and prominent position.
Directional signage will run north and south along Sepulveda Blvd., Main St. and Vista
del Mar. Traveling east and west, signage will be located along El Segundo Blvd.,
Grand Ave., Mariposa and Imperial Hwy. The signage is in two (2), three (3) and four (4)
line listings that include combinations of the following: Civic Center, Public Parking,
Downtown, Police / Fire, Recreation Park, and Library. Signs located along Sepulveda
Blvd., Vista del Mar, and Imperial Hwy. will be 4' wide. All others will be 3' wide. To
assist traffic entering from Sepulveda Blvd., additional signage will be placed along El
Segundo Blvd., Grand Ave., and Imperial Hwy, within 100' to the west of Sepulveda
Blvd.
Distinctive parking signs that match other way finding signs will be posted at the
entrance of the four public parking lots, the parking structure located within the
downtown area, and the two parking lots adjacent to the Recreation Park. The parking
structure will have two (2) types of signs attached to the front entrance; halo style pin
letters over the driveway and an illuminated 4' translucent box that sits perpendicular to
the face of the structure on the west column.
(;�h
EL SEGUNDO
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO I MESSAGE SCHEDULE
I\
D 1 N C P L A V
1111 r.
v
DOWNTOWN
r
DOWNTOWN
i
IX
14
n]
A - �lDOWNTOWN
At
DOWNTOWN
t ; " I I . . .
6:
SL
Police
Fire
®R
PW
N
Police
Fire
B2-01
B2-02
0 PYDER GROUP
w
Recreation
■ Public Parking
pti
' J
� k1
Recreation
Ntific Parking
Library
r Recreation
(,
N �
r �i
J
it
ppl
LllmV
Public Parkwg
s
r
;ems
r �i
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
r
Civic Center
'�' S`•tr�� Public Parking
wall��da,
�,, Downtown
!! C!& Se^ w.. '.�Bti ?�,:.�fsc..y•a ":t:::.it.. gt'... ..._.+.u. I
I �
iii
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
I >
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
t
a �
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
r y
IM
Y
v.
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
i
'71
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
- +
t�
r
CIYIf Cf R'!r ��
1
� � Pabbc Va41nQ �
0•�Nn�urr�l � � •
t
I Ie
I -
CIYIC Centef
Public Pafkmg
Downtonu
s
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
I �.I
I
V
row.
IRA,
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
i.�
E�
wF'"M
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
C1 -15
0 4tiyE1�
CRouP
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
Am
r
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
10.
F "� gook -' !RIF FRI
No
W.
OP
w.
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
0 R y6E
Cl.2r
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
r
Ilk•
'1� I
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
—90
I
it1•� a• r
a AWA
•!
Police
Fir¢
Lio�a: y
77;- 7,7-.
I
Public Perklr�
,iir 1
i —
f,
• 'ti i1
rr �
pri
x
DI-03
pri
GROUP
RYDER
�P'
f
4� f
.. F j r
Pnhhc Pa(WIR
tis
r
o
Public Parking
t
f (-P)
blic Parking
Ip rl. f '-w",
4
i
P
Pub is Parking
t
r r 1?
!;
''
Dl-08
Dl-09
si
0 RYDER GROUP
E1 -01
E2 -01
• RYDCR DRC)up
civic Lester
Public Parkin
UoMatows
,�, Recreatroa �
7r ,
r. 'Z• y
b : IT s
at
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
literary
side&, Am
i
a Y i
Civic Center
Puhlu ParkinP
f „ Onwnlr:wn
Library
1
� x
NI �.
Civic Center
Public Parking .�
Downtown '
Pohce;f�re .
I
I
I
I
i
xt
Civic Centel
Pnhlic Parking
Downtown
Policelhie
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
Police /fire
now
CL S
PF'.
71
+ti
y r
nNN
1pU6
Nc i
TEL j
d
w
�I
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
Police /Fire
r--=
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
r �; .•
Police INe
`9
fir; _
Civic Center
Public Parking
Oowntown
-1 9Z
' police IFtre a
}
".4.,
!y
•
C.7
M
a
0
0
0
o�
O
Z
P
a
s°
z
m�
s
o
�o
O P
4�
ao
n Q
< y
0
U
0 4
ly m
,
III r
I
r
�a
�
II•
is
I
` it
'II!
. � _ .•. -.
1
1
I _l �l
,� it
W
-Igo
l
��I�
-. -
IF
-AL
h
rn.s
j
Imo:
I I
l L.
r
�
, �
II
lg ...
i
y
it
;
I
III
I
O
�••
i .
� ly •_
I F'1 .
i
I
I
'-
I
•
I
I
I
I ;'
s �
<f
1!�
CLIENT: SHE"TITLC WITL• SN[R:
aroEa aaour w ! Ei >Pq:.nuo sign type C 4 f
I
Mrs Eaves — Small Caps
ABC DEFGHIJKLMNOPf-"W1') STUVWXYZ
911-
ABC DEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
M
RYDIR
CUM r. SHEET TITLE; DAM smur.
C,tv of E; Segundo 70125
L
r
2.
CL
0 :?. ..
1:
1a
0
CL
C,
Ei z 3
3 i:
F,
ji
0
Z
Alan
siotso
%r* =nm
T
31
IM
3. nt
n
3* 4 a
a— cc'
—,m D g5
5
.0
.1 jF
'o
as
2L 2
SL
P
o CL
c
;F
IL
CL a
f
IL
0 1
a
rc
0
0
c'
0
C:I 3
wa
60
r
13
P3
0
'?
N3 n nm
=a
�
;CF I,
A..-
a--
��
c
3 2.
4
3 �
1
20 c
0
m.0
'n
ex
1-b
CL V
c cr 0
&L
0
09 - SPECIFICATIONS
A. Trades work: It Is Intended that the workmanship be of the highest
quality obtainable by the respective trades and crafts experienced
In the fabrication of signs.
A. Intent of Specific
pass eye level ex
art director.
A. Owner and RCG reserve the right to Inspect work In the fabrication
shop in progress and before it is shipped to the job site for
Installation.
S. Fabricator shall Inspect Installation locations for conditions
which will adversely affect execution. performance and quality or
work, and shall not proceed with Installation until unsatisfactory
conditions have been corrected.
A. Verity and state the exact sign locations at on site walk-thru with RCG
and Owner at the job site for all sign locations which are not exactty
dimensioned on the drawings. ?Wlfy RCG of arty conditions that ffW
adversely affect satisfactory Installation of graphic elements.
9. Except as indicated otherwise on the drawings, Install
prefabricated work plumb, level, square and true to line.
C. Securely anchor work In-proper location using anchors,
anchorages, fasteners, or other methods approved on shop
drawings. All anchors and fasteners shall be appropriate to the
anchorage condition.
D. Coordinate work and access to site with the Owner.
E. Final adjustment and cleaning:
1. Touch -up all scratched, marred, abraded, or otherwise damaged
surfaces to match original surfaces.
2. Clean -up work area after installation has been completed.
3. Sign fabricator shall be responsible for repairing or correctl
damage to other contractor's work resulting from sign fabri
work.
End of Specifications
ecuewr DATE: >"Ur.
!YD[! 6a0YP t 10 i005 j 90125
Police Recreation Library
Fire Public Parking Recreation
Civic Center Police
• P
DOWNTOWN Public Parking Fire
Downtown Library Public Parking
Police
Civic Center
Civic Center
Fire
Public Parking
Public Parking
Library
Downtown
Downtown
Public Parking
Recreation
,
Library
,
Library
Public Parking
Civic Center
Public Parking
Downtown
Police / Fire
�
;|
a
a
�
m34�`H
\ 28"H \ --
�11 17H , «H �
�
�¥
}
� -- --
§$
$(
({
�2
ar m
§!2
/§
\�
&
/
\ \ \
\�\
\�j
\ \ $
) ;k
.
$,!
§2/§
f# ¥`
!
m34�`H
�
�¥
}
� -- --
§$
$(
({
�2
/§
\�
&
�
�
Z
�
�
�
�
i
�
k
.• ■
§'
2!
2x44 "H
a,7H ,sS�H
k
�
,E / 283/4"
i
| �
!| !(
§§ )a
§§ ��
� §
!
w
N
�
Z
�
�
�
�
22537
�
)!7
§fyi
k/
)(
!!t}
k0x
,E / 283/4"
i
| �
!| !(
§§ )a
§§ ��
� §
!
w
N
�
Z
�
�
�
�
e
0
t a S
H
N � y
� 3
N o
0
R
G
A
j
N
N
14 - SIGN TYPE C
3' W
T W !
29"W
i
i
f�
In
h N1
I =�
NOTE PROVIDE I
SHEETING OVER
314" H
3M SCOTCHLITE VIP DIAMOND GRADE REFLECTIVE SHEETING,
BACKGROUND TO BE SURFACE SILK SCREENED WITH 3M
TRANSLUCENT INKS
FLAT CUT 118' AI.UMIIUM PANEL WITH FACE SURFACE
COVERED W.TH 3M SCOTCHLITE DIAMOND GRADE
REFLECTIVE SHEETING. PANEL SIDES AND BACK TO BE
PAINTED. CORNERS TO BE EASED WITH 44' RADIUS
3M SCOTCHLTE VIP DIAMOND GRADE REFLECTIVE SHEETING,
BACKGROUND TO BE SURFACF SILK SCREENED WITH 3M
TRANSLUCENT!NKS, REVERSE OUT COPY
4' DIAMETER ALUMINUM HEAVY YVALL POST
3'
I
io
O
NOTE
SIGN CONTRACTOR TO SCHEDULE ALL UNDERGROUND UTIUTV
CHECKS, VERIFY ALL EYJSTR4G SITE CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY THE
OWNER OF ANY INSTALLAT -ON CONFLICTS PRIOR TO FABRICATION.
SIGN CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY Al L FINAL METHODS OF ATTACHMENT
TO FINISHED GRADE PRIOR TO FABRICATION
f •
"' "' "" ALIGN POST
MTH TOP OF SIGN
SICi'4FIX BRACKET AND
STAENI.ESS STEEL STRAPPING
DATE: smut
S ..
IIYDLo
IO tO.CB 14 0125
I
4" DIAMETER ALUMINUM HEAVY WALL
P05T - FLUSH INWOCAPPEO END
TACK WELD EACH END OF
BRACKET TOALUMINUM
PANEL FOR ADDITIONAL
PANEL SUPPORT
E e A i I C'
0
2'
510NFLX MEDIUM ALUMINUM
E1(TRUSION AND UNIVERSAL
5TAINLF55 STEEL CHANNEL CLAMP
V8' THICK FLAT CUT OUT ALUMINUM SION
PANEL WIN PAINTED FINLSH ON ALL SIDES
JM vIP GRADE REFLECTIVE VINYL APPLIED TO
FACE OF ALUMINUM PANEL
• I CLIENT: SHEET TITLE
OIIOU� DATE; Mar.
City of El Sequnao S,4' rr:,•, ' ,rr.;, ,JP73. s !010.09 1 Is of 2S
e .. — t ! s
V,
/\
4'H _
\/ �,� &H��.���
�9-
— �g § \j6
/�\
f)
�7
�g�§/
wE2
_N
( @|
§q�rf
�
;(!
; §�s
�
|\(��
�
�
m
§
a
»
�
�(k��
§
\�
0 `2}
e0
— �g § \j6
/�\
f)
�7
�g�§/
wE2
`# ;■
( @|
§q�rf
;
;(!
; §�s
k§\
|\(��
�(k��
§
\//
0 `2}
e0
§|�fk
` |k2
2$9
/
•
—
— 101 - -
- - - --
--
11
�
kk
j\
f)
�7
|
6
_
17 - SIGN TYPE C MOUNTING DETAILS
WK WELO EAC
51WKET T()AL
?ANE, FOR A0[;
PANT I.
0 Nyorit 4*0up CLIENT.
IS - SIGN TYPE D
3'W
TW 29'W _I
i =
a
_ � 1
M N
1314* H
A SCOTCHLtTE VIP DIAMOND GRADE REFLECTIVE SHEETING.
IICKGROUND TO BE SUWACE SILK SCREENED WITH 3M
uNSLUCENT INKS.
AT CUT 118' ALUMINUM PANEL MTI FACE SURFACE
3VERED WITH 3M SCOTC14LITE CIA"D GRADE
:FLECTIVE SHEETING PANEL SIDES AC BACK TO BE
VOTED. CORNERS TO BE EASED WITH V4' RADIUS.
M
O
3'
A SCOTCHLITE VIP DIAMOND GRADE REFLECTIVE SHEETING,
\CKGROUND TO BE SURFACE SILK SCREENED WITH 3M
7ANSLUCEN' INKS REVERSE OUT COPY
NOTE.
SIGN CON,, RACTOR TO SCHEDULE ALL
UNDERGROUND UTILiTYCHECKS. VERIFYALL
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AID NOTIFY THE
(W4NER OF ANY INSTALLATION CONFLICTS
DIAMETER A.UMIN IM HEAVY WALL POST PRIOR TO FABRICATION SIGN CONTRACTOR TO
VER:FYALL FINAL METHODS OF ATTACHMENT
TO FINISHED GRADE PRIOR TO FABRICATION.
ALIGN POST
WmN Tor OF SIGN
SK*f -FW BRACKET
AND STANILM
STEEL STRAPPOJG
•.... -... CLIENT - 2:
R is at YOLR 6ROUR 1: is at 25
19 - SIGN TYPE D MOUNTING DETAILS
0
s-
2'- 11' 6-
F]OSp16►OLES
rttcMwsoua
b
- rT4�
aat.�crEaswKLSSttw
E)aFA 1OHPAKrEDTOWUQF
EMr���sK
SUACESsSYEELC ts,EL
.•,
t„ *LCMM
+
UCKWELD6ALOMaWMRtD
,stare OF EXtXJ3 M rat VM
arrortr Pb tea owes a, r�cq
�
.ns rA0 ax arr art AU W W twa
. RYCRR OROU►
NOTE: PROVDEAHT i FFiTISHEETW
OVER EWW FACE
..,......� �.._. �� srCXL
AMP
stair.
,9W25
20 - SIGN TYPE D
• ME* spoup CLIENT: SHEET TITI SHIM
21- SIGN TYPE D
COLOR TO WW OM TO SCHEOULE
t' TALL AHOOM ALUMNAJM PMi LETTERS
VMH REAR WTUVOL L. QWMIO
OOLOR TO OONFORM M SC}EOIAE
S IROJ[CT CLIENT: DAM SHEET:
T.
GROUP fy If E; SeQVOO t rt "a
iha•.t:nema S-Qr,aye a'a Graph•.z
�
®E /i[(
k(i�§`
�§` \¥
%§ »moo
J §rg
^k$){
/fe /!
�q&
§§ §]§
®! "a2
(! §%©
it
9! _)
k
5!
&;
�E
kk
§�
r§
■
N
N
W
5
Z
�
�
�
ril
rrl
43114 ��
R
$$
Q
�&
|
23 - SIGN TYPE E MOUNTING DETAILS
Gocup
'Uihl'
DATE: SmEr.
1010 CI'S 23 of 25
24 - SIGN LAYOUT AND COLORS
A K �
RYOLR OROUR - ' SHM TITI DATE
i1QTi
uo•25
E
m_
N
a
tya
N
tJq
r
2
T
O
r
ril
r
rn
D
O
Z
N
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 21, 2006
AGENDA STATEMENTAGENDA HEADING: Reports of Committees, Commissions and Boards
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action
request to initiate the process for
free by January 1, 2010 and for all
Impact: none)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
regarding the El Segundo Senior Housing Board's
Park Vista Senior Housing facility to become smoke
common areas to be smoke free immediately. (Fiscal
(1) Consider the item and provide direction to staff. (2) Alternatively discuss and take
other action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Attachment A: Letter from Park Vista Resident, Steve Haxton
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Amount Budgeted: $0
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s): none
ORIGINATED BY: E1 Segundo Senior Housing Board, Sept. 24, 20
REVIEWED BY: Judy Andoe, Interim Recreat'on and Parks Dire
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manage,
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
At the August 27, 2008, El Segundo Senior Housing Board meeting several residents
from Park Vista spoke regarding the Non - Smoking agenda item before the Board. Many
residents spoke in favor of the ban. None were recorded in favor of continuing as a
smoking facility. The Senior Housing Board voted unanimously as follows: "That as
soon as possible, all interior and exterior common areas in this building are to be smoke
free, that immediately and thereafter all vacated units are to be smoke free and that by
January 1, 2010 the entire building is to be smoke free ".
Specifically, the Sr. Housing Board identified the following areas as facility common
areas and recommended they become no smoking areas effective immediately: all
apartment balconies, concrete apron surrounding the building, hallways, the main lobby,
the laundry area and garages. The apartment balconies were recommended due to the
close quarters of the balconies in relation to neighbor's balconies and windows.
It was further recommended that new applicants to the facility be told of the new no
smoking policy and that new tenants not be allowed to smoke in their apartments. All
3
i. C 1
current smokers are able to smoke in their apartments until Dec. 31, 2010. However,
beginning Jan. 1, 2010, all smoking must take place outside the facility.
Should City Council approve the recommendation, the Board will notify all prospective
residents of the non - smoking policy and have the house rules reflect said policy.
EMWO]
Attachment A
From: S Haxton [mailto:steve_lawlib @yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 1:35 PM
To: Bill Fisher; Jacobson, Carl (Council Member); Brann, Don (Council Member); Busch, Eric (Mayor Pro
Tem); McDowell, Kelly (Mayor)
Cc: Neil Cadman; Whalon, Pete; Andoe, Judy; Wayt, Jack; Bob Widen; Carol Wingate; Don Mcllroy; Jerry
Osnower; Paula Rotolo
Subject: Park Vista must be smoke -free
Gentlemen:
Several months ago, at a Housing Board meeting, Neil Cadman read a letter from a Park Vista
resident. She wrote she was a quiet resident and never complained about anything but now she
was writing about her health problems caused by smokers on a balcony beneath her unit. Neil
Cadman continued a precedent he had already established when relating input from residents by
not giving her name.
You likely never met this lady. She is among the majority of Park Vista residents who are shy
and non - assertive. Park Vista has a greater percentage of these people than you find elsewhere,
with a statistical correlation likely related to many residents here having been financially
challenged for most or all of their lives.
I know this lady but 1 will follow Neil Cadman's precedent and not use her name. 1 can
verify she is quiet, unassuming and well - liked. To me, the most interesting point about her
situation is that she does not live directly over the of smoker but cater- corner over him.
Can you imagine how bad it must be for residents who live directly over smokers?
The lady's letter initiated discussion and resident input at a subsequent Housing Board meeting.
(1 did not attend that meeting and 1 gave no input). Your Housing Board wisely decided to
request that .smoking on balconies and all common areas be banned immediately and that Park
Vista become entirely smoke free by January 1, 2010. This allows .smokers a remarkable fifteen -
month grace period to give up the habit and spare themselves and the rest of'us health and safety
issues.
You might recall automatic door - closures are mandated.for Park Vista by California Building
and Safety Code. In our close community of units, automatic door - closures are intended to save
lives - - -by inhibiting an uncontrolled fire from .spreading rapidly from one unit to hallways and to
other units. In hot weather, some residents want increased airflow inside their unit and they
defeat the purpose of their automatic door - closure by propping open their front door.
September 30 was a hot day. October 1 was a warm morning. 1 left my unit at 5:30 a. m.
I immediately noticed a smoky smell. 1 walked along the hallway and around a curve to see a
propped door. That resident is a smoker. How would you rate this for double duty, for
increasing risks of both health and safety of one's neighbors?
Park Vista residents look forward to your vote supporting your Housing Board's request.
Steve
2568133 - 2566330
001
GENERALFUND
104
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
106
STATE GAS TAX FUND
108
ASSOCIATED RECREATION ACTIVITIES FUND
109
ASSET FORFEITURE FUND
11 t
COMM. DEVEL. BLOCK GRANT
112
PROP *A* TRANSPORTATION
114
PROP "C" TRANSPORTATION
115
AIR QUALITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM
116
HOME SOUND INSTALLATION FUND
117
HYPERION MITIGATION FUND
118
TDA ARTICLE 3 SB 821 BIKEWAY FUND
119
NITA GRANT
121
FEMA
120
C.O P.S. FUND
122
L.A.W.A. FUND
202
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 073
301
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
302
INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT FUND
405
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
501
WATER UTILITY FUND
502
WASTEWATER FUND
503
GOLF COURSE FUND
601
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
602
LIABILITY INSURANCE
603
WORKERS COMP. RESERVE(INSURANCF
701
RETIRED EMP. INSURANCE
702
EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND - DEVELOPER FEES
703
EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND OTHER
708
OUTSIDE SERVICES TRUST
TOTAL WARRANTS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
WARRANTS TOTALS BY FUND
553,185.66
84,318.28
8,708.32
111,580.82
77.08
21.93
160,073.29
360.22
7,368.69
4,544.38
3,970.89
3,098.54
7,193.00
100,481.02
1,830.54
21,912.10
3,884.27
24,970.53
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Information on actual e)lpenditures is available in the Director of Administrative Services office in the
City of El Segundo.
I certify as to the accuracy of the Demands and the availability of fund for payment thereof.
For Approval: Regular checks held for City council authorization to release.
CODES:
R = Computer generated checks for all non - emergency /urgency payments for materials, supplies and
services in support of City Operations
For Ratification.
A = Payroll and Employee Benefit checks
B -F=
Computer generated Early Release disbursements and/or adjustments approved by the City
Manager. Such as: payments for utility services, petty cash and employee travel elrpense
reimbursements, various refunds, contract employee services consistent with current contractual
agreements, instances where prompt payment discounts can be obtained or late payment penalties
can be avoided or when a situation arises that the City Manager approves.
H = Handwritten Early Release disbursements and/or adjustments approved by the City Manager.
FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER
DATE: 1011,4101B DATE: x / lmf�
S 1,097,579.56
DATE OF APPROVAL: AS OF OCTOBER 21, 2008
VOID CHECKS DUE TO ALIGNMENT:
WA
VOID CHECKS DUE TO INCORRECT CHECK DATE:
VOID CHECKS DUE TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE ERROR:
NOTES
REGISTER t1 1
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2008 - 5:00 P.M.
5:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER — Mayor McDowell at 5:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor McDowell
- Present
Mayor Pro Tern Busch
- Present
Council Member Brann
- Absent
Council Member Fisher
- Present
Council Member Jacobson
- Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City
Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify
themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of $250.
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
None
CLOSED SESSION:
The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act
(Government Code Section §54960, et seq.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real
Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation;
and /or discussing matters covered under Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel); and /or
conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators; as follows:
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a) -
-1- matter
City of El Segundo vs. City of Los Angeles, et. al. LASC No. BS094279
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(b): -0- potential case (no
further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government
Code §54956.9(c): -1- matter.
DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957): - 0- matter
5
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 7, 2008
PAGE NO. 1
i1;i i
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54957.6): - 4- matters
City Negotiators: City Manager Jack Wayt; Human Resources Director Bob Hyland; Finance
Director Deborah Cullen; Richard Kreisler. Employee Organizations: (1) Unrepresented
management/confidential employees (City employees who are not members of bargaining units);
(2) El Segundo Police Officers' Association; (3) El Segundo Firefighter's Association; (4) the El
Segundo Police Management Association.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8): - 0- matter
SPECIAL MATTERS: - 0- matter
Council Recessed at 6:50 p.m.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 7, 2008
PAGE NO. 2
(, j ti
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2008 - 7:00 P.M.
7:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER — Mayor McDowell at 7:00 p.m.
INVOCATION — Pastor SeHee Han, United Methodist Church of El Segundo
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Mayor Pro Tern Eric Busch
PRESENTATIONS
a. Mayor McDowell presented a Proclamation to City Employee Lauren Mahakian announcing
week of October through 11, 2008 as "No Drugs Down The Drain ".
ROLL CALL
Mayor McDowell
- Present
Mayor Pro Tern Busch
- Present
Council Member Brann
- Absent
Council Member Fisher
- Present
Council Member Jacobson
- Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City
Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify
themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of $250. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow
Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after
Public Communications is closed.
Jenny Daves, El Segundo PTA, spoke on the annual PTA Drive.
Patricia Meccia, Lights of Your Life, spoke regarding custom themed prints.
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda by title only.
MOTION by Council Member Jacobson, SECONDED by Council Member Fisher to read all
ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda by title only. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS
VOICE VOTE. 5/0
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS (PUBLIC HEARING)
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 7, 2008
PAGE NO. 3
J .
Consideration and possible action (Public Hearing) regarding the proposed revision to the
City of El Segundo's 2008 -2009 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program to
cancel Project D96660 -08, Juvenile Diversion and reallocate CDBG funds totaling $13,039
to an alternate CDBG project. (Fiscal Impact: $13,039)
Mayor McDowell stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a public hearing regarding the
proposed revision to the City of El Segundo's 2008 -2009 Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Program to cancel Project D96660 -08, Juvenile Diversion and reallocate CDBG funds
totaling $13,039 to an alternate CDBG project. (Fiscal Impact: $13,039) Clerk Domann stated that
proper notice was completed and no written communication had been received by City Clerk's
Office.
Tina Gall, CDBG Program, gave a presentation.
MOTION by Council Member Jacobson, SECONDED by Council Member Fisher to close the
Public Hearing. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. COUNCIL MEMBER
BRANN ABSENT
MOTION by Mayor Pro Tern Busch, SECONDED by Council Member Jacobson to cancel CDBG
Project D96660 -08, Juvenile Diversion, and reallocate CDBG funds totaling $13,039 to an
alternate CDBG Project; Authorize the City Manager to execute amendments and or contracts with
the Los Angeles County Community Development Commission. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. COUNCIL MEMBER BRANN ABSENT
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a
call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next
heading of business.
2. Approved Warrant Numbers 2567815 to 2568132 on Register No. 24 in the total amount of
$2,495,584.63 and Wire Transfers from 9/04/2008 through 9/25/2008 in the total amount of
$2,553,367.90. Authorized staff to release. Ratified: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks;
checks released early due to contracts or agreement; emergency disbursements and /or
adjustments; and wire transfers.
3. Approved Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of September 16, 2008 and Special City
Council Meeting Minutes of September 25, 2008.
4. Waived second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 1424 to amend Title 4, Chapter 11 in
its entirety to regulate motion picture, radio, and television production within the City of El
Segundo. (Fiscal Impact: None)
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 7, 2008
PAGE NO. 4
V J `f
5. Adopted Plans and Specifications for trenchless rehabilitation of sanitary sewer main on
Imperial Highway from east to west City limits. Project No.: PW 08 -10 (Fiscal Impact:
$835,000) Authorized staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids.
6. Adopted Resolution No. 4572 authorizing the annual destruction of identified records in
accordance with the provisions of Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of
California. (Fiscal Impact: Not to exceed $1,000)
7. Received and filed a determination that the City Council does not object to a new Type 41
ABC license for on -site sale and on -site consumption of alcohol at an existing restaurant
located at 409 East Grand Avenue, EA No. 793 and AUP No. 08 -03. Applicant: Scot F.
Nicol (Fiscal Impact: None)
8. Pursuant to ESMC § 15- 18 -8(H, 1), approved a request from Mattel, Inc. to install two new
temporary five hundred four (504) square -foot "Special Event Signs" for a period of three (3)
months from October 13, 2008 and ending January 13, 2009 on the north side of the
parking structure located at 333 Continental Boulevard. Applicant: Mattel, Inc. (Fiscal
Impact: None)
9. Authorized the City Clerk to file the City's Planning and Building Safety Director's Notice of
Completion in the County Recorder's Office and authorized the City Manager to accept
completion of work for 42 homes related to the City's Residential Sound Insulation Program
Group 21 (Project No. RSI 07 -03). (Final Contract Amount: $889,184.03)
10. Authorized the City Clerk to file the City's Planning and Building Safety Director's Notice of
Completion in the County Recorder's Office and authorized the City Manager to accept
completion of work for 17 homes related to the City's Residential Sound Insulation Program
Group 22 (Project No. RSI 07 -05). (Final Contract Amount: $870,940.07)
MOTION by Council Member Jacobson, SECONDED by Mayor Pro Tem Busch to approve
Consent Agenda Items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE
VOTE. 4/0. COUNCIL MEMBER BRANN ABSENT
CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA
F. NEW BUSINESS
G. REPORTS — CITY MANAGER - NONE
H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY - NONE
REPORTS — CITY CLERK - NONE
J. REPORTS — CITY TREASURER - NONE
K. REPORTS — CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 7, 2008
PAGE NO. 5
l.- j�%
Council Member Brann — ABSENT
Council Member Fisher — NONE
Council Member Jacobson — NONE
Mayor Pro Tern Busch — Spoke on the recent Richmond Street Fair. Also noted that El Segundo
High School was having Homecoming this Friday, October 10tH
Mayor McDowell — Reported on Panel discussion "Creative Economy in Los Angeles County ".
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have receive value of $50 or more to communicate to the City
Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify
themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of $250. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow
Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after
Public Communications is closed.
Tarrence LaBlu, owner of Fantastic Cleaners, spoke regarding a parking problem at his location.
MEMORIALS — NONE
CLOSED SESSION — NONE
ADJOURNMENT at 7:16 p.m.
Cathy Domann, Deputy City Clerk
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 7, 2008
PAGE NO. 6
l,�v!
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, October 13, 2008, 8:00 A.M.
City Council Chambers
350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA 90245
CALL TO ORDER — Mayor McDowell at 8:00 a.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor McDowell
- Present
Mayor Pro Tern Busch
- Present
Council Member Brann
- Present
Council Member Fisher
- Present
Council Member Jacobson
- Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City
Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify
themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of $250. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow
Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after
Public Communications is closed. - NONE
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda by title only.
MOTION by Council Member Jacobson, SECONDED by Council Member Fisher to read all
ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda by title only. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS
VOICE VOTE. 5/0
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS -
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Consideration and possible action to terminate the professional services agreement with
Bernards who was retained by the City of El Segundo to provide construction management
services on the Fire Station 2 project. Additionally, consideration and possible action to
authorize the City Manager to execute a temporary professional services agreement with
Tom White in the amount of $9,500 to provide construction management services for the
Fire Station 2 project until a new professional services agreement is approved. (Fiscal
Impact: None)
Kevin Smith, Fire Chief, gave a report.
MOTION by Council Member Jacobson, SECONDED by Mayor Pro Tern Busch to authorize the
City Manager to terminate the professional services agreement with Bernards and authorize the
City Manager to execute a temporary professional services agreement in the amount of $9,500
with Tom White. MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOICE VOTE: AYES: MCDOWELL,
BUSCH, FISHER AND JACOBSON; NOES: BRANN. 4/1
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a
call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next
heading of business.
2. Consideration and possible action to extend the City's agreement with Cassidy and
Associates through September 30, 2009 for the provision of legislative advocacy services in
Washington D.C. and to approve federal advocacy work program elements. (Fiscal Impact:
$160,000 for FY 2008 -2009)
Council consensus to place item on the agenda for the next regular council meeting on October
21, 2008.
E. REPORTS — CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member Brann — NONE
Council Member Fisher — NONE
Council Member Jacobson — NONE
Mayor Pro Tern Busch —
3. Consideration and possible action regarding the City commissioned Cost Allocation and Fee
Study for fees charged to the public for services rendered by various City Departments that
was performed by Revenue Cost Specialist, LLC.
Council consensus to direct staff to study and /or incorporate fee incentives /reductions for
environmentally sensitive ( "Green ") construction projects.
Council consensus to direct staff to study what other cities are doing with regard to a Public Art
Program and Public Art Fund.
Mayor McDowell —
CLOSED SESSION
MOTION by Mayor McDowell, SECONDED by Mayor Pro Tern Busch to move to closed session.
MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
2. J E
The City Council moved into a closed session (8:20 A.M.) pursuant to applicable law, including the
Brown Act (Government Code Section §54960, et seq.) for the purposes of conferring with the
City's Real Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing
litigation; and /or discussing matters covered under Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel);
and /or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a) -
-0- matter
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(b): -1- potential case (no
further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government
Code §54956.9(c): -0- matter.
DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957): - 0- matter
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54957.6):- 4- matters
1. City Negotiators: Interim City Manager Jack Wayt; Human Resources Director Bob Hyland;
Finance Director Deborah Cullen; Richard Kreisler. Employee Organizations: (a) Unrepresented
management/confidential employees (City employees who are not members of bargaining units);
(b) El Segundo Police Officers' Association; (c) El Segundo Firefighter's Association; and (d) El
Segundo Police Management Association.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8): - 0- matter
SPECIAL MATTERS: - 0- matter
REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required)
ADJOURNMENT at 10:10 a.m.
Cathy Domann, Deputy City Clerk
3.
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 21, 2008
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding the award of a Standard Public Works
Contract to FS Construction for the installation of risers for the Stevenson Field bleachers
at 339 Sheldon St. — Project No. PW 08 -07 — (Fiscal Impact: $30,000.00)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Recommendation — (1) Approve a transfer of $4,000.00 from the Recreation Park
Softball Field Retaining Wall Project (Project Account No. 301 - 400 - 8282 - 8996); (2)
Authorize the City Manager to execute a Standard Public Works Contract in a form
approved by the City Attorney with FS Construction in the amount of $30,000.00; (3)
Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
None
FISCAL IMPACT: Included in Adopted Budget
Amount Budgeted: $26,000.00
Additional Appropriation: Yes $4,000.00
Account Number(s): 301 -400- 8202 -8991 ($26,000), 301- 400 - 8202 -8996 ($4,000)
ORIGINATED BY: Dan Garcia, Assistant City Engineer Pe
REVIEWED BY: Dana Greenwood, Public Works Directorvl,6-
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manageyp
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
On August 5, 2008, City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized staff to
solicit bids for the installation of risers for the Stevenson Field bleachers. On September 30,
2008, the City Clerk's office opened bids that were submitted by 11:00 am. FS Construction
submitted the only bid at $30,000.00.
The project was a part of the 2007/08 CIPAC projects funded at $26,000.00. The project consists
of installing risers on the existing bleachers at Stevenson Field bleachers to prevent items larger
than four (4) inches from falling behind the bleachers. An additional $4,000.00 would be
required to award this project. Staff recommends appropriating this additional amount from the
Recreation Park Softball Field Retaining Wall project since this project encompasses additional
improvements at the same park. There is currently $255,000.00 budgeted in the Softball
Retaining Wall Project. Staff additionally recommends awarding this contract to FS
Construction. FS Construction has worked for many cities in the south bay area and is a
reputable firm. 6
1. i '1
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 21, 2008
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional
Services Agreement with DCA Civil Engineering Group for the Softball Retaining Wall
Design at 339 Sheldon Street — RFP No. 08 -13 (Fiscal Impact: $28,881.00)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services
Agreement with DCA Civil Engineering Group in a form approved by the City Attorney
in the amount of $28,881.00; (2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to
this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
DCA Civil Engineering Group Proposal
FISCAL IMPACT: Included in Adopted Budget
Amount Budgeted: $255,000.00
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s): 301 -400- 8202 -8996
ORIGINATED BY: Dan Garcia, Assistant City Engineer DF,
REVIEWED BY: Dana Greenwood, Public r s Director -V \b
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Man,
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
The FY 2007/2008 CIP budget approved $220,000.00 for this project and $40,000.00 was
carried over for this project from the FY 2006/2007 CIP budget. The Teen Center Wall was
originally included with this project and was subsequently repaired with in -house staff for a cost
of $5,000.00, leaving a total budget of $255,000.00.
RFP No. 08 -13 was released on August 20, 2008. Proposals were opened on October 2 and the
only proposal received in the City Clerk's office was from the DCA Civil Engineering Group for
$28,881.00. DCA has a good reputation in the local area. Staff has reviewed the costs and
determined that they are reasonable. Staff recommends approval of this professional services
agreement with DCA Civil Engineering Group to design the retaining wall at the Recreation Park
Softball Field.
7
G;1
CIVIL.
ENGINEERING
DCAGROUP
ISection II
Scope of Work
Proposal
Retaining Nall at Recreation Park Softball Field
' DCA Civil Engineering Group team understands that the City of El Segundo is interested in
expanding the warm -up area along south side the softball field at Recreation Park (adjacent to the
' right field). Further, DCA Civil Engineering Group understands that in order to maximize this area,
earth and trees must be removed and a retaining wall must be constructed into the existing slope
between the bleachers and the back fence line. The scope includes but is not limited to the
' following:
a. Conduct a field survey to create a topographic record of the existing slope for calculations
' needed in the design of the retaining wall to be constructed.
b. Perform soils sampling and testing. Prepare a soils report based on the findings of the soil
' exploration to determine the characteristics and parameters of the soil for the design of
the wall. For purposes of this proposal, please include the quantity and method of
sampling and testing and all expected costs associated with such sampling and testing.
c. Design a retaining wall that will maximize the warm -up area between the existing
bleachers and back fence line and be within the parameters of the soils report. The design
shall include dimensions, footing details, structural diagrams and full plan and profile.
d. Provide 3 sets of completed design plans and specifications (deliverable) that can be used
to bid the project for construction. Plans should include dimensions, footing details,
structural diagrams and full plan and profile. Specifications should be able to provide
sufficient product identification to be clearly understood by contractors during the
bidding process.
6 r: 1 r
DCACIVIL
ENGINEERING
GROUP Proposal
Retaining Waft at Recreation Park Softball Held
Schedule
DCA Civil Engineering Group will adhere to the time schedule for the design of the retaining wall
for this project and will ensure a timely completion. The work will commence on date specified in
the Notice to Proceed to be issued by the Public Works Department and will be completed within 90
working days after the date of commence. Below is a preliminary proposed schedule:
PC — Plan Check
0' L88'8Z
00
lelol
00"OOZ' L $
uolleulp�000 loafold g s6u4aayy
00'000'L $
suogeogpads
p
g ueld u61sop pelaldwoo ;o slas £ - salgeJanllap
00984'8 $
LL
8Z
4Z
8L
9
u6lsaQ IleM 6ululelaa
a
00'CS4'Z
LZ
9
b
9
OL
Z
uogejedaJd podaa
00'OL4'Z $
ZZ
8
ZL
Z
sls�tleuy pue uo.4elldwoo elep
00'000'Z $
0
sls�(leuy tiolejoge-I
00'OL9'Z $
bL
Z
9
9
uollenlen3 ooepnsgnS
00'018 $
8
Z
9
aouelealo
4mn jo; lno )peyy pue aouessleuu000b aUS
00'Z09`L $
t4
Z
8
Z
Z
maiwd puna6iloeg pue uogeulpiooa loalad
6wlsal pue 6ulldwes yos - ljodaU silos
Q
00'096'9
9£
4
9
OZ
Z
£
Z
sueld aseg olydei6odo1- AanjnS play
e
99 $
£ZL $
69 $
06Z$
40L $
6EL $
89 $
49L $
88L $
96$
SOL $
O£L $
09L $
se4eb ruillps
3
v
C7
T
o
�i
(n
r
m
m
°
2
o
cti
0
cn
�►
o
cu
O
O
-u
0
X
a
m
a
CD
0
uollo d /wall
uollob /wall
2
m
w
m
2
c
o
�
p
gad lsoo
gad
�
o �,
1
m
m
0
y
rn
a
�.
palelnoleo
sjnoH leloi
m
a
m
o
l<
m
o
uolloy /wall
s }apoo
°1
y
CD
m
o
)JOddnS
Jaaul2u3 silos Jalui`d'u3 PAID
Plaid IIeg130S Ned uolleanab le IleM 6ululelaa :aweN loafad
dnoms Voo
JNIU33NIJN3
11A10
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 21, 2008
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding the Adoption of Plans and Specifications and
Authorization to advertise for bid the renovation of the Human Resources Office at 350
Main Street — Project No. PW 02 -21 (Fiscal Impact: $130,000.00)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Recommendation — (1) Adopt Plans and Specifications; (2) Authorize staff to advertise
the project for receipt of construction bids; (3) Alternatively, discuss and take other
action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Estimate
FISCAL IMPACT: Included in Adopted Budget
Amount Budgeted: $630,000.00
Additional Appropriation: No Included in budgeted amount
Account Number(s): 301 - 400 - 8201 -8475
ORIGINATED BY: Dan Garcia, Assistant City Engineer
REVIEWED BY: Dana Greenwood, Public Works Director-Tl�
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manago
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
In 2002, the City envisioned this project to include replacing the existing windows around City
Hall, revamping the Council Chambers, remodeling the West Conference Room and expanding
the Human Resources Department Offices. In the FY 2008/2009 adopted budget, an
appropriation for $630,000.00 was included to address the City Hall Improvements. One of the
components of the budgeted project was to implement the portion of the original scope of
remodeling the Human Resources Office. At this time, staff is recommending that the City
proceed with the expansion of the Human Resources Department Offices. Staff recommends that
this $130,000 (see attached estimate) be appropriated to allow implementation of this project.
Subsequent City Council actions such as amending the existing BOA design contract and
approval of plans and specifications for the remaining portions of this project will be presented at
a later date for City Council consideration.
E43
ULt%J
CITY HALL IMPROVEMENTS
City Hall Improvements - Estimate
General Categories
Human Resources
Council
Chambers
West Conference
Room
Engineering
Demolition /Construction
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 50,000
$ -
EquipmenVAV /Electrical
$ -
$ 60,000
$ 35,000
$ -
Cubicle /Ergonomics
$ 20,000
$ -
$ -
$ 35,000
Furniture
$ 5,000
$ 150,000
$ 15,000
$ 20,000
Carpet
$ 5,000
$ 5,000
$ 5,000
$ -
Totals
$ 130,000
$ 315,000
$ 105,000
$ 55,000
Subtotal $ 605,000
Contingency (10 %) $ 60,500
Grand Totali655
Window Replacements for all
of City Hall $500,000 estimate
13
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 21, 2008
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding approval of ongoing service agreements and
blanket purchase orders for FY 2008 -2009 in excess of $25,000 and possible action to
waive the formal bidding process and authorize the continued purchase of gasoline and
diesel fuel for City vehicles and equipment through the use of spot market purchasing for
the Public Works Department (Fiscal Impact: $397,000)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
(1) Authorize staff to continue to purchase gasoline and diesel fuel for City vehicles and
equipment through the use of spot market purchasing in an amount not to exceed
$347,000.
(2) Authorize the issuance of blanket purchase order to Metron Farnier & Actaris in an
amount not to exceed $50,000 for the purchase of single jet water meters for the City's
water system.
(3) Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
None
FISCAL IMPACT: Included in Adopted Budget
Amount Budgeted: $397,000
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s): 001 -102- 0000 -0801 ($347,000) 501 -400- 7102 -5207 ($50,000)
ORIGINATED BY: Ron Fajardo, General Services Manager Vr-
REVIEWED BY: Dana Greenwood, Director roof'Public Work��
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manage/ /Z
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
1. Fuel for City Vehicles and Equipment
001 - 102 - 0000 -0801 ($347,000)
It is estimated that City vehicles and equipment will consume 68,000 gallons of gasoline and
16,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Fiscal Year 2007 -2008 at the cost of $288,000. Due to the high
amount of volatility in the market, the City increased its fuel budget to $347,000 in Fiscal Year
2008 -2009.
Generally, fuel is purchased either through spot market purchases or long -term contracts. Spot
purchasing consists of shopping around each time fuel is needed and purchasing fuel from the
E91
41
lowest priced vendor. This type of purchasing usually occurs when the fuel market is volatile as
it has been for the last three years. During periods of stability, agencies enter into long -term fuel
contracts. Pricing under long -term contacts is tied to a published fuel price baseline plus a
markup. The recent volatility in the market has forced vendors to raise the markup under long-
term contracts to as much as 5% making long -term contracts unattractive. Under the City's last
long -term contract through Los Angeles Metropolitan Public Purchasing Agents' Cooperative
(LAMPPAC), there was virtually no markup. When that contract expired in September 2005,
the fuel market was quite volatile and City Council authorized staff to purchase gasoline and
diesel fuel through the use of spot market purchases.
Many agencies including Cities of Manhattan Beach, Culver City and Hawthorne have opted to
purchase fuel through spot purchases in lieu of entering into long -term contracts since the
expiration of the LAMPAC contact. Staff continuously monitors long -term contracts available
in the industry. When the terms of long -term contracts improve such that the price is a few cents
over the market baseline, staff will again recommend entering into a long -term fuel contract.
Pursuant to El Segundo Municipal Code (ESMC) § 1 -7 -10, relating to purchases and supplies,
the City Council may at any time, by a majority vote and without amending the ESMC, waive
purchasing procedures or alter proceedings to fit a specific purchase, when the waiver is not in
violation of State law. Spot purchasing is the sort of modified purchasing arrangement that
requires such a waiver by Council. It is possible that the total of purchases from any one vendor
may exceed $25,000; therefore, Council approval of spot purchasing is requested.
2. Water Meters — Metron Farnier & Actaris
501 - 400 - 7201 -5207 ($50,000)
The City's water distribution system includes approximately 250 large commercial compound
water meters three to eight inches in diameter. As large meters age, they become less accurate
and tend to register water usage that is below actual consumption. It is common in the water
industry to replace older large meters as they are typically the greatest source of unbilled water
or lost water. When meters are replaced, the Water Division installs single jet water meters
rather than compound water meters. The single jet meters provide increased metering accuracy,
excellent low flow registration, and less maintenance. The cost to replace each meter ranges
from $2,000 to $5,000, dependent upon size.
Staff plans to continue replacing meters in FY 2008 -2009 and recommends continuing to
purchase meters from Metron Farnier & Actaris in an amount not to exceed $50.000.
i. �i 8
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 21, 2008
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding the Proposal from Beach Cities Transit to
participate in funding operation for the 109 Line for two years in conjunction with the
Cities of Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach (Fiscal Impact: $64,598
for FY 2008 -09 and $72,412 for FY 2009 -10. Two year fiscal impact: $137,010)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
(1) City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Beach Cities
Transit to continue funding Bus Line 109 for the next two years; (2) Alternatively discuss
and take other action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Proposal Letter from Beach Cities Transit
FISCAL IMPACT: Included in Adopted Budget
Amount Budgeted: $149,150
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s): _--444,-400 -5293 -5206
ORIGINATED BY: Judy
REVIEWED BY:
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt,
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
Line 109 runs from Redondo Beach to downtown Los Angeles, passing through Hermosa Beach,
Manhattan Beach, El Segundo and LAX. The line operates roughly between the hours of 6:00
am to 10:00 pm on weekdays and 6:00 am to 9:00 pm on weekends. For El Segundo the route
runs north along Vista Del Mar, east on Grand Ave., north through downtown on Main St.,
continuing east on Imperial, stopping at Sepulveda, Hughes Way, Nash St. and Douglas, every
30 to 60 minutes depending on the time of the day, and makes 16 stops within the City.
In May 2006, Line 109 replaced MTA Line 439 when MTA identified as "regionally
underperforming" the portion of the line between south Redondo Beach and LAX, and decided
to discontinue the service. Beach Cities Transit, a community -based transit system that operates
out of the City of Redondo Beach, entered into two -year equitable cost - sharing agreements with
the above stated cities to operate Line 109 mirroring MTA Line 439 route and schedule. The cost
for the City of El Segundo was $128,000 per year of the two year agreement. The goals were to
continue providing mobility and mitigating vehicular congestion in the south bay cities. Beach
Cities Transit expected that Line 109 would qualify for funding from MTA in two years, no
longer requiring a subsidy from any of the beach cities from 2008 on. However, Line 109 still
tit 0
10
has a funding shortfall. Although the financial gap has been reduced by 29% from FY 2006 -07 to
FY 2008 -09, the anticipated Formula Allocation Box and fare box revenues have not been
sufficient to
compensate for the remaining nominal financial shortfall and the rise in fuel prices.
Beach Cities Transit proposes to continue supporting Line 109 with the benefiting cities sharing
the cost. In June, estimates for cost sharing were significantly higher until Metro's decision to
continue lines 124 and 126. Metro's inclusion of lines 124 and 126 reduced costs significantly.
However, the original estimate was budgeted in El Segundo's FY 08 -09 budget this year.
Therefore, leaving a balance of $84,412 to be forwarded to FY 09 -10, should continued
appropriations be considered. Other issues to be considered in evaluating this proposal include
the following:
Projected Costs
The estimated net cost of operating the Line is $371,677 for two years. The portion of the cost to
be paid by the City of El Segundo is $64,598 the first year, and $72,412 the second year. The
following is the two year term breakdown of contributions from each city:
2008 -2010
2 yr. term
Service mile percentage
El Se undo
$137,010
36.86%
Hermosa Beach
$56,844
15.29%
Manhattan Beach
$61,217
16.47%
Redondo Beach
$116,606
31.37%
* Based on service miles. El Segundo's maintains 4.1 service miles.
Line Usage
Since the start of the operation two years ago, ridership has increased an average of 29%
annually. However, actual ridership numbers are low. Mass transit indicators show that ridership
of Line 109 will grow due to consumer need by way of fuel costs and congestion.
Other Beach Cities
The Cities of Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach are also considering Beach Cities Transit's
proposal. At a recent meeting staff from both cities indicated that they intend to recommend to
their city councils that their cities continue to participate in the program. The City Council of
Hermosa Beach expects to consider this proposal on October 14, 2008, and the City Council of
Manhattan Beach on October 7, 2008.
CONCLUSION:
Staff feels participation in Line 109 is beneficial to El Segundo. Increased investment in the use
of public transportation provides significant, direct environmental benefits and helps meet
national air quality standards and the route offer /Line 109 provides a valuable service to both
residents and visitors to the El Segundo area. Failure to offer public transportation alternatives
would likely result in increased traffic volumes and exacerbate congestion problems.
However, in light of the low numbers of individuals riding the BCT route as it is structured
today, serious review of this route and an alternative route is highly recommended during the
first year of this agreement for fiscal responsibility purposes, to meet the need public demand
and for continued support from the City of El Segundo. An alternative route for Line 109
which encumbers more business destinations is now being discussed for the City of El Segundo;
suggesting a more traveled line be developed to alleviate the more congested areas by
incorporating a route which connects Plaza El Segundo to Downtown Main St., El Segundo in
lieu of traveling the standard Vista Del Mar route to downtown El Segundo.
Beach Cities Transit commitment to continue to pursue additional funding alternatives to cover
the funding shortfall and to seek out additional methods to lower the costs will also be required
for it's future success.
It is recommended that the Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with
Beach Cities Transit to fund the proposed El Segundo portion of Bus Line 109, subject to the
following:
• Participation would be contingent on the Cities of Redondo Beach, Hermosa
Beach and Manhattan Beach also participating in the agreement and that El Segundo
would participate as a copartner with the other cities.
• As a part of the agreement, Beach Cities Transit agreed to invest in improved
marketing.
• The City will request performance indicators on regular basis.
• The agreement would cover a period of two years with provisions to amend agreement to
adjust current route to include possible alternatives which connect Plaza El Segundo to
Main Street, El Segundo.
i. -vi
Attachment A
August 28, 2008
Jack Wayt
Acting City Manager
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Subject: Line 109 City Manager Meeting Responses
Dear Mr. Wayt:
I would like to thank you for your patience and cooperation in working with the City of Redondo
Beach and the Beach Cities Transit (BCT) to resolve issues relating to the contract agreement for
Line 109 (the "Pacific Coaster "). Our staff has been working diligently during the past several
weeks to provide your city with the most equitable cost sharing arrangement for Line 109.
Per your request in our last meeting, we are providing you with clarifications for the following
inquiries:.
1. Ridership Analysis per City along the Line 109 route
2. Explanation for the requested contributions
3. Existing Bus Lines along the Beach Cities Corridor (Attachment A)
Please feel free to contact Gwendolyn Parker at (310) 318 -0631 ext 2246 or me at (310) 318-
0631 ext 2246 for any questions and/or comments.
Sincerely,
Bill Workman
City Manager
City of Redondo Beach
cc: Gwendolyn Parker, HBT, City of Redondo Beach
Bill Crowe, City of El Segundo
Richard Brunette, City of El Segundo
RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS
Ridership analysis for Line 109 was performed to determine boarding and alighting activities
between the Cities of El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, and Redondo Beach.
Ridership counts were taken at random one hour intervals one day per month from July 2007 to
June 2008. Ridership counts were evaluated based on: trip direction (northbound, southbound),
month, day and hour.
The analysis concluded very active ridership numbers. Some examples of the dynamic
boardings and alightings per city are described below. Commuter ridership are most obvious
during peak times originating from the Green Line Station traveling southbound and conversely
during afternoon peak times. There is a marked increase in ridership during the warmer months.
There was also no significant difference in ridership trends between weekdays and weekends.
Weekday Peak Mornings from LAX Southbound have the highest ridership activities. This
particular trend may indicate that commuters are utilizing Line 109 to travel from the Green Line
Station and points north to travel southbound towards the Beach Cities. Reverse commute
northbound from Beach Cities toward Green Line Station conversely occurs beginning mid-
afternoon. (See Graph A below.)
Southbound- AM
Northbound- PM
Thursday,
Wednesday,
May 29, 2008
Boardings
Alightings
April 23, 2008
Boardings
Alightings
SOUTHBOUND
NORTHBOUND
6:42- 7:34am
26
26
15:41- 16:38pm
19
19
REDONDO
REDONDO
T
BEACH
0%
8%
BEACH
37%
5%
HERMOSA
HERMOSA
T
BEACH
4%
46%
BEACH
21%
16%
MANHATTAN
MANHATTAN
T
BEACH
0%
23%
BEACH
21%
0%
T
EL SEGUNDO
0%
15%
EL SEGUNDO
21%
11%
T
LA
96%
0%
LA
0%
68%
Graph A
L" J
The analysis concluded that ridership activities are generally higher during the warmer months
from April to October. (See Graph B below.)
Graph B
Although there is a general increase during weekends, it is a minimal comparative difference
between weekends and weekdays ridership activities. (Graph C)
Weekda s
Sunday,
Weekends
Sunday,
Friday,
August 26, 2007
Boardings
Alightings
January 13, 2008
Boardings
Alightings
NORTHBOUND
August 26,
NORTHBOUND
2007
Boardings
15:10 -16:07 PM
30
28
Boardings
10:10- 11:07AM
14
0
REDONDO
NORTHBOUN
REDONDO
NORTHBOUND
J
BEACH
23%
14%
BEACH
0%
0%
19
HERMOSA
15:10 -16:07 PM
30
HERMOSA
REDONDO
1
BEACH
27%
7%
BEACH
7%
0%
5%
MANHATTAN
BEACH
23%
MANHATTAN
HERMOSA
BEACH
27%
25%
J
BEACH
7%
0%
16%
EL SEGUNDO
13%
32%
27%
EL SEGUNDO
7%
0%
LA
10%
21%
1
LA
79%
0%
Graph B
Although there is a general increase during weekends, it is a minimal comparative difference
between weekends and weekdays ridership activities. (Graph C)
Weekda s
Weekends
Friday,
Sunday,
September 07,
August 26,
2007
Boardings
Alightings
2007
Boardings
Alightings
NORTHBOUN
NORTHBOUND
D
13:30- 14:27pm
19
18
15:10 -16:07 PM
30
28
REDONDO
REDONDO
BEACH
5%
0%
BEACH
23%
14%
HERMOSA
HERMOSA
1
BEACH
16%
0%
1
BEACH
27%
7%
MANHATTAN
MANHATTAN
1
BEACH
37%
17%
BEACH
27%
25%
1
EL SEGUNDO
42%
17%
1
EL SEGUNDO
13%
32%
j
LA
0%
67%
LA
10%
21
Graph C
EXPLANATION FOR REQUESTED CONTRIBUTIONS
Letters were sent to the South Bay Cities requesting financial contributions for the continued
operation of Line 109 between May and July 2008. Following are the explanations for the
varying amounts.
ii :J i
May 22, 2008
Due to Metro's intention to cancel Metro Lines 124 and 126 which service the South Bay Cities,
BCT planned to take over the cancelled lines in order to maintain transit connectivity. The May
22 letter incorporated the assumed costs for absorbing the discontinued lines increasing initial
contributions by approximately 16 %.
MAY 22 LETTER
Initial Contribution
2008 -2009
2009 -2010
El Se undo
$128,106
$149,127.45
$161,523.88
Hermosa Beach
$74,984
$86,881.52
$94,103.67
Manhattan Beach
$86,639
$100,385.79
$108,730.50
June 18, 2008
At Metro Board meeting, Metro decided against discontinuing lines.
June 24, 2008
Due to Metro's decision to maintain Metro Lines 124 & 126, cost assumptions associated with
the absorption of Metro Lines 124 & 126 are not included, and required contributions were
reduced accordingly. Redondo Beach assumed greater financial risk and burden of projected
increase in petroleum costs.
JUNE 24 LETTER
2008 -2009
2009 -2010
El Se undo
$40,305
$45,454
Hermosa Beach
$25,410
$27,466
Manhattan Beach
$26,286
$29,644
Redondo Beach
$83,239
$93,873
July 28, 2008
Final amounts accurately reflect fair contributions equally.
LY 28 LETTER
2008 -2009
2009 -2010
Se undo
j
$64,598
$72,412
rmosa Beach
$26,801
$30,043
anhattan Beach
$28,863
$32,354
Redondo Beach
$54,978
$61,628
Difference between June 24 letter vs July 28 Letters
ENCE
2008 -2009
10
ndo
d
+$24,293
$26,958
a Beach
+$1,391
f2009-20
$2,577
an Beach
+$2,577
$2,710
Redondo Beach
- $28,261
- $32,245
i- ::1 J
Although the financial gap has been reduced, the anticipated Formula Allocation Funds and fare'
box revenues were not sufficient to compensate for the remaining nominal financial shortfall and
the rise in fuel prices.
While we did not meet your expectation for a fully funded `Pacific Coaster' line, we are hoping
that your City continue to participate in this growing bus line through your City, and that the
above two -year funding scenario to cover the funding shortfall is acceptable to your City. The
BCT will continue to pursue additional funding to cover the funding shortfall and seek out
additional methods to lower the costs. Several indicators have shown this Line 109 to be a very
successful transit line through your City.
N=
r- . � X1'109
EL s EGUN DO
ATTACHMENT A
BEACH CITIES TRANSIT- BCT 109
` CIBU
MAX HA
g, BEACH
x'
=I
I
O�T104
C6i3
91
FSMQNW 0,
81
Z.,
t�
s'
Q!
HH ERMOSA
EACH
RREDONDO
EACH
CONNECTING REGIONAL
SERVICE
LADOT - COMMUTER EXPRESS
438
METRO -124,125,126,130,232,625
METRO LAX SHUTTLE - 6259 626
TORRANCE - T3
Al
X3
o
EL
S
F a SE
T:
� QOrC
L
i
1
N
108m wu
ml
omm
MANHATTAN II
1
Z.,
t�
s'
Q!
HH ERMOSA
EACH
RREDONDO
EACH
CONNECTING REGIONAL
SERVICE
LADOT - COMMUTER EXPRESS
438
METRO -124,125,126,130,232,625
METRO LAX SHUTTLE - 6259 626
TORRANCE - T3
BEACH CITIES TRANSIT- BCT 109
REGIONAL MAP
N
CITY OF LOB ANOBLM
L llw 7MNOOY
um madmA s SA MUN I
EL = SEGUNDO • � "W"
uNS llm TlSNOUMl
ML §SWNSO 4.i WSAW
env EiI LL
•
rANNATTwN rAIg1
MANHATTAN BEACH '
uNe 9=77w m
NI KATTSM SfwPJN L1 MLIM
O
NBIIM BEACH �t
NS A �SION 1i mum i
' t+onw�NNNS d�
R "®t NDO AL°AC" y, �
um n 9 Ili liL7lJNi l4 1,
ftmm)0 00 SS/14H s im ai iL
LINE 109 -PACIFIC It
Jo
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 21, 2008
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding award of City's professional services
contract for auditing services with Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. for three years through
2008 -2010, plus optional two year extension. (Fiscal Impact: $265,300; 2008 -2012)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Authorize approval of three year professional services contract for auditing services
with Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. through years 2008 -2010 for $155,140 and optional
two year extension for years 2011 and 2012 for $110,160.
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACT: Included in Adopted Budget
Amount Budgeted: $51,200
Additional Appropriation: No To be included in future year budgets.
Account Number(s): 001 -400- 2502 -6214
ORIGINATED BY: Rolf Schleicher, Fiscal Services Manager .
REVIEWED BY: Deborah Cullen, Director o��ance
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manager
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
On August 2008, the Director of Finance initiated the solicitation of RFP bids from eight
qualified auditing professional services firms to audit the City's financials. The statement of
work was clearly defined to include new accounting pronouncements and regulations which will
increase auditing procedures, control activities, auditing hours and associated costs. The period
of audit services is from years 2008 -2010 with optional extension for two additional years of
service pending performance and quality of work preformed.
The evaluation of selected auditing firms included the following review criteria to assist staff in
making their final determination. Staff reviewed all submitted proposal materials and conducted
in -depth panel interviews and rankings, which included questions related to their audit approach,
specific technical capabilities, experience, administrative task management, professionalism,
reporting writing abilities and research follow -up. Based on staff findings, Mayer Hoffman
McCann P.C. was selected and is recommended for contract award due to their national
reputation and technical expertise, experience with city and government auditing, quality and
1 1
access of assigned staff, shared resources available and listing of government audit clients.
The following is a list of candidate auditing firms that participated in the previously described
evaluation process:
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
2301 Dupont Dr.
Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92612
Diehl, Evans & Company, LLP
5 Corporate Park
Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92606 -5165
Moss, Levy & Hartzheim, LLP
9107 Wilshire Blvd.
Suite 400
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Lance, Soil & Lunghard, LLP
203 N. Brea Blvd.
Suite 203
Brea, CA 92821 -4056
�%Gr)
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 21, 2008
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action to extend the City's agreement with Cassidy & Associates
through September 30, 2009 for the provision of legislative advocacy services in Washington,
D.C., and to approve federal advocacy work program elements. (Fiscal Impact: ($160,000 for FY
2008 -2009)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Authorize the Mayor to execute the attached agreement with Cassidy & Associates;
2. Approve the federal advocacy work plan as outlined in Cassidy & Associates Memorandum
of September 18, 2008 and City's Homeland Security Needs Assessment;
Instruct the City Manager, affected departments, and our Washington, D.C. advocate to work
with the Congressional staff and local government associations to pursue the City's federal
funding and program objectives.
4. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Cassidy & Associates memorandum outlining a proposed work plan for FY 2008 -2009;
Scope of Services; City's Homeland Security Needs Assessment; Draft Agreement
FISCAL IMPACT: Budget Adjustment Required
Amount Budgeted: $155,400
Additional Appropriation: Yes $4,600
Account Number(s): 001 - 400 -2901 -6407
ORIGINATED BY: Bill Crowe
REVIEWED BY: Bill Crowe 6,t-/
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manag
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
Over the past decade, Cassidy & Associates has been extremely successful in federal advocacy
on behalf of the City. In addition to their policy work, which has ranged from aviation noise
impact related advocacy to base support and retention lobbying on behalf of Los Angeles Air
Force Base during the most recent Base Realignment and Closure round, Cassidy has been
successful at securing federal appropriations on behalf of the City for a variety of infrastructure
projects ranging from the implementation of the City's Sewer Master Plan to the Douglas Street
Gap Closure project. Federal funds of over $10 million have been secured since fiscal year 2000
for these important infrastructure projects.
12
i� b 1
For the new fiscal year, the City — with the assistance of Cassidy & Associates — has developed a
federal advocacy scope of work that focuses on homeland security and hazards mitigation. Those
funding strategies are outlined in the attached Homeland Security Needs and Hazards Mitigation
briefing paper. Key priorities include: obtaining an additional tactical operations radio frequency,
acquisition of a new public safety computer -aided dispatch and records management system
(CAD /RMS), purchase of a mass notification and warning system, and establishment of an
alternate emergency dispatch and operations center.
These important public safety program enhancements along with recommended communications
and utility infrastructure improvements will contribute substantially to improve the City's
preparedness to deal with security threats and multiple hazard situations. Therefore, staff
recommends Council (1) approve an agreement with Cassidy & Associates for federal legislative
advocacy services for a monthly retainer of $13,333, or $160,000 annually; (2) approve the
federal advocacy work plan as outlined in Cassidy & Associates Memorandum of September 18,
2008 and City's Homeland Security Needs Assessment document; and (3) instruct the City
Manager, affected departments, and Cassidy & Associates to work with congressional members,
their staff and local government associations to pursue the City's federal funding and program
objectives.
HOMELAND SECURITY NEEDS & HAZARDS MITIGATION
Back rg_ound
The City of El Segundo is located immediately south of Los Angeles International
Airport. The 5.5 square mile city is home to the largest oil refinery on the West Coast;
two electricity generating plants; the primary sewage treatment facility for the City of
Los Angeles; 21 high -rise buildings; Los Angeles Air Force Base; over 12 major
aerospace and defense firms; and many other high -tech and other Fortune 500
companies.
As a major employment center for the South Bay of Los Angeles County, the City's
daytime population exceeds 85,000 people. El Segundo is also near not only the ports of
Los Angeles and Long Beach, it is within minutes of many of the region's significant
transportation corridors.
These facts mean that the City and the surrounding region are exposed to an unusually
high risk of threats associated with homeland security issues and multiple hazard
scenarios. A homeland security event or other disaster that significantly impacted El
Segundo would have far - reaching impacts on the region, the economy of Southern
California and the nation's defense as a whole.
In recent years the City of El Segundo has focused significant emphasis on being
prepared for the impacts of a homeland security event or other type of disaster.
Significant progress has been made, but much remains to be done to ensure the City's
readiness and capability to provide services in the event of a disaster, protect its residents
and workers and recover quickly.
To that end, the Fire and Police Departments recommend that the City pursue assistance
to acquire the following prioritized public safety resource needs:
o Additional Radio Frequency for Tactical Operations
Estimated cost: $1,000,000
o New Computer Aided Dispatching /Records Management System for use in
Primary and Alternate Police /Fire Dispatch Centers
Estimated costs: $1,000,000
o Mass Notification and Warning System: Audible warning systems utilizing sirens
and/or voice combined with electronic technology systems utilizing computers,
pagers, email, and telephones.
Estimated costs: $500,000
o Alternate Emergency Police /Fire Dispatch Center (To be combined with Alternate
EOC).
Estimated cost: $1,000,000
'� b 3
o Emergency Operations Center Equipment: Computers, LCD projectors,
televisions, phones, and chairs.
Estimated costs: $125,000
o Alternate Emergency Operations Center Equipment: Computers, LCD projectors,
televisions, phones, tables, and chairs.
Estimated costs: $150,000
o Fiber Optic Information Network: Linking of City owned facilities through a
fiber optic network.
Estimated costs: $2,500,000
o Voice Over Internet Phone System: Replace existing City phone system with
voice over internet phone capability.
Estimated costs: $500,000
Implementation of these resources would dramatically improve the City's overall
readiness and preparedness to address homeland security events and other disasters.
These resources would ensure that the City has the ability to communicate with and
address the needs of residents, business, industry, the military and the surrounding region.
Sepulveda Boulevard and El Segundo Boulevard divide the City into four major
quadrants. The northwest quadrant consists of the residential community, Downtown
Business District, the El Segundo Civic Center (City Police and Fire Departments), all
schools of the El Segundo Unified School District, City water storage facilities, and the
Smoky Hollow commercial and industrial district. The Chevron refinery is located in the
southwest quadrant. The southeast and northeast quadrants are primarily Commercial and
Industrial areas. El Segundo Boulevard also provides public access to the Pacific Ocean
beach recreational areas.
El Segundo Boulevard is the only major arterial roadway for residents, employees, Police
and Fire emergency vehicles, and the Chevron refinery entering and exiting the two
western quadrants of the City. It handles an average daily traffic in the magnitude of
40,000 to 75,000 vehicle trips. Any disruption of this access mode could have a major
impact on the city's evacuation plans during emergencies.
There are utility poles along the north side of El Segundo Boulevard covered by overhead
utility lines that provide power to the western quadrants of E1 Segundo. These poles are
12" and larger in diameter and 80' -100' tall. Natural disasters such as earthquake or any
homeland security event can cause damage to the poles resulting in the closure of the
only major arterial roadway within the two western quadrants.
To address this condition, the Fire and Police and Public Works Departments recommend
that the City pursue assistance to mitigate this hazard:
o Undergrounding of overhead utilities
Estimated cost: $6,000,000
In addition, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires construction of safe
traveling sidewalks and handicap accessible pedestrian ramps whenever the City
undertakes construction of improvements.
o ADA sidewalk improvements
Estimated cost: $1,500,000
Summary
With funding for these aforementioned projects, the City will be able to take significant
steps to minimize the impact resulting from the threats associated with homeland security
issues or natural disasters to the City.
i� b;i
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 21, 2008
AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding a request from Northrop Grumman to install two
1,334 square -foot permanent wall signs located at 101 Continental Boulevard. (Fiscal Impact:
N /A)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Approve Northrop Grumman's request to install two proposed 1,334 square -foot permanent
wall signs and adopt a Resolution approving Environmental Assessment No. 802 and Sign
Permit 08 -01; and/or
2. Alternatively, discuss and take other possible action related to this item
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Resolution
2. Letter of request from Western Sign Systems, dated August 18, 2008.
3. Sign Plans
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Amount Budgeted: N/A
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s): N/A
ORIGINATED BY: Kimberly Christensen, AICP, Planning Manager�L.
REVIEWED BY: Greg Carpenter, Director P anning and Building Safety
APPROVED BY: Jack Wayt, City Manages
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
I. Background
On August 19, 2008, Northrop Grumman submitted a letter to the City requesting approval of
two 1,334 square -foot permanent wall signs mounted at the top of the north and south facing
building facades. El Segundo Municipal Code (ESMC) Section §15- 18 -8(H) requires City
Council approval for signs larger than 500 square feet. ESMC §15- 18 -6(B) requires approval of
the sign plan by the Director of Planning and Building Safety. The letter of approval from the
Director is attached to this report. The two 1,334 square -foot signs located on the north and
south building elevations will face a parking lot and El Segundo Boulevard respectively. The
existing 220 -foot tall building was the former offices of Xerox Corporation.
13
The surrounding land uses are as follows:
Land Uses Zone
North:
Parking Lot and Commercial office
CO
South:
Golf course
O -S
East:
Commercial office
CO
West:
Commercial office
CO
II. Analysis
The applicant is requesting City Council approval of two 1,334 square -foot permanent signs for
the Northrop Grumman commercial office building located on the northwest corner of El
Segundo Boulevard and Continental Boulevard at 101 Continental Boulevard in the Corporate
Office (C -0) Zone in compliance with ESMC § 15- 18 -8(H). The two proposed signs are
included as part of a sign program that includes 6 signs approved by the Director of Planning and
Building Safety subject to Council approval of the two oversized signs.
The proposed signs are identical in design, composition, and installation method. Each sign is
166 feet and 11 inches wide and 8 feet high. The signs are composed of .22 gauge sheet metal
channel letters, painted blue, and illuminated in white neon.
ESMC Section §15-8-8(B) limits the maximum square footage for wall signs on freestanding
buildings to 5% of the building face. The area of the building face on each side where the signs
are proposed is 215 feet wide and 220 feet high giving it a building face area of 47,300 square
feet. Five percent of the building face area is 2,344 square feet. Therefore, the proposed 1,344
square foot sign is in compliance with the maximum allowed sign area.
The signs are located behind the required minimum 5 -foot setback. Additionally, the signs are
not located in a required corner clearance or driveway visibility area.
III. Environmental Review
The proposed project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) pursuant to Categorical Exemption Section 15311(a), Class 11, as a replacement of
minor accessory structures such as on- premise signs. The project consists of two 1,334 square -
foot signs on an existing commercial office building. The project is not anticipated to have any
significant impacts with regard to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
IV. Conclusion
Planning staff recommends approval of Environmental Assessment No. 802 and Sign Permit SP
08 -01 since the required findings for support have been made.
PA\Planning & Building Safety \PROJECTS \801- 825\EA- 802\EA -802 SP 08 -01 101 Continental Blvd. CC SR.doc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING TWO 1,334 SQUARE -FOOT SIGNS ON
A COMMERCIAL OFFICE BUILDING AND ADOPT THE
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
NO. EA -802, SIGN PERMIT SP 08 -01 LOCATED AT 101
CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD.
The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares that:
A. On August 18, 2008, Western Signs Systems, filed an application for an
Environmental Assessment No. 802 and Sign Permit No. 08 -01, to install
two 1,334 square -foot signs for a commercial office building for the
Northrop Grumman Corporation at 101 Continental Boulevard;
B. The application was reviewed by the City's Planning and Building Safety
Department for, in part, consistency with the General Plan and conformity
with the El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC ");
C. In addition, the City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under
the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§
21000, et seq., "CEQA "), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal.
Code of Regulations § §15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines "), and the
City's Environmental Guidelines (City Council Resolution No. 3805,
adopted March 16, 1993);
D. The proposed project was analyzed for its environmental impacts and is
deemed categorically exempt under Section 15311(a), Class 11 of the
CEQA Guidelines;
E. On October 21, 2008 the City Council held a public hearing and
considered the information provided by City staff, public testimony and
Western Sign Systems; and
F. This Resolution, and its findings, are made based upon the entire
administrative record including, without limitation, testimony and evidence
presented to the City Council at its October 21, 2008 public hearing
including the staff report submitted by the Planning and Building Safety
Department.
PAPlanning & Building Satety\PROJECTS \801- 825 \EA - 802 \EA -802 SP 08 -01 101 Continental Blvd. CC reso.doc
SECTION 2: Factual Findings. The City Council finds that the following facts exist:
A. The project site is located in the Corporate Office (CO) Zone located at
101 Continental Boulevard;
B. The proposed project is to install two 1,334 square -foot permanent signs
on a commercial office building at 101 Continental Boulevard;
C. The two 1,334 square -foot signs comply with ESMC §15- 18 -8(8) in that
they do not exceed 5% of each respective building face;
D. The subject site is currently vacant, and was formerly occupied by the
Xerox Corporation; and
E. The proposed signs conform to ESMC §15 -18 -2 that regulates signs in the
City of El Segundo.
SECTION 3: General Plan. The proposed project conforms with the City's General
Plan and the zoning regulations in the ESMC as follows:
A. The General Plan land use designation for the site is Corporate Office.
B. The Corporate Office (CO) land category use permits a mixture of office
and food serving uses in single- tenant or multi- tenant buildings with limited
retail uses in the lobby area.
C. The proposed project will encourage the effective use of signs as a means
of communication in the city; maintain and enhance the aesthetic
environment and the city's ability to attract sources of economic
development and growth; encourage signs which are integrated with and
harmonious in size, design, style, material, and appearance to the
buildings and sites which they occupy and surround; the proposed project
is consistent with the purpose of the zone in that signs are allowed.
D. The proposed signs are consistent with the General Plan. The General
Plan contains several relevant Goals, Objectives, and Policies in the Land
Use Element. Staff finds that allowing signs is consistent with the General
Plan. The two signs are consistent with Land Use Element Policy LU 1 -5.2
in that the two signs comply with the quantity, quality and location
requirements in the adopted comprehensive sign ordinance. The
proposed use is consistent with Land Use Element Goal LU4 in that the
two signs provide a means of communication for commercial uses that
provide a stable tax base for the City.
2
PAPlanning & Building Safety \PROJECTS \801 - 825 \EA - 802 \EA -802 SP 08 -01 101 Continental Blvd. CC reso.doc
E. The surrounding land uses include: a hotel and office uses. The proposed
signs for the office use will be compatible with the surrounding uses.
SECTION 4: Environmental Assessment. The City Council makes the following
environmental findings:
A. The project is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15311(a), Class 11; and
B. Accordingly, based upon the evidence presented to the City Council, the City
need not prepare an environmental impact report for the proposed project.
3
PAPlanning & Building Safety \PROJECTS \801- 825 \EA - 802 \EA -802 SP 08 -01 101 Continental Blvd. CC reso.doc
V ( �
SECTION 5: This Resolution is City Council's final decision and will become effective
immediately upon adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of October, 2008.
Kelly McDowell, Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Resolution No. as duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and
signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 21 st day of October, 2008, and the same was so passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
By:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
Karl Berger, Assistant City Attorney
4
PAPlanning & Building Safety \PROJECTS \801 - 825 \EA - 802 \EA -802 SP 08 -01 101 Continental Blvd. CC reso.doc
�1
W E S TE;R N S I G N
S Y S T E M S
August 18, 2008
City of El Segundo
Attn: Paul Samaras
350 Main Street
El Segundo, Ca 90245
RE: Northrop Grumman
101 Continental Blvd.
EI Segundo, CA
- - - - -
y
4 internally illuminated wall signs, and 2 illuminated monument signs
for "NORTHROP GRUMMAN" at the above referenced property. We
understand that any sign over 500sf needs to get City Council
approval. Please send this sign package to City Council for approval
as soon as possible. Feel free to contact me directly with any
questions, comments or changes.
Sincerely,
Tiffany Del Gatto
Western Sign Systems
1020 Linda Vista Dr.
San Marcos, CA 92078
P. (760) 736 -6070
F. (760) 736 -6073
• Sign Type A: (2) Two 1334 square foot wall signs.
• Sign Type B: (2) Two 276.8 square foot wall signs.
• Sign Type C: (2) Two6' x 12' s/f monument signs.
� "7 a
N It
N
�Z
Z
y
i
y
y
0
4
N
v y
�y
V�
o�
�o
�a
i�
y
y
0
e
N
w
�z
r O
r
wZ
'a
a
i�
^a
Z
� y
y \
y
0
a
N
'
I o
A
m
O
!
lOfm
f/�
m
! Zmi
m
ml
m
m m
o
i C
i w
I y
m� N! m
O
'pmei`
=m
I Do
Y ?ice
c
I
V!J
° °NORTHROP GRUMMAN
Q NEW CHANNEL LETTER DISPLAY SCALE: 1/16" = 1' -0"
MANUFACTURE AND INSTALL (J NEW SETS OF CHANNEL LETTERS
(1) ON NORTH ELEVATION & (1) ON SOUTH ELEVATION
BACKS: .22 GAUGE SHEET METAL
RETURNS: .22 GAUGE SHEET METAL
TRIMCAP: 3/4" BLUE
PAINT: PAINT EXTERIOR OF LETTERS TO MATCH PMS 286 C BLUE
FACES: 2051 BLUE PLEX
ILLUMINATION: SPARKLING BLUE NEON
BUILDING HEIGHT = 220'
BUILDING LENGTH = 215'
220'x 215' = 47,300 SO. FT.
47,300 SO. FT x 5% = 2365 SQ. FT.
NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/64" 1' -0"
54' -4 1/4"
�N0RT/5/R0P GRUMMAN
10' -0"
Q NEW CHANNEL LETTER DISPLAY SCALE: 3/32" = 1' -0"
MANUFACTURE AND INSTALL (2) NEW SETS OF CHANNEL LETTERS
(1) ON WEST ELEVATION AND (1) ON EAST ELEVATION
BACKS: .22 GAUGE SHEET METAL
RETURNS: .22 GAUGE SHEET METAL
TRIMCAP: 3/4" BLUE
PAINT: PAINT EXTERIOR OF LETTERS TO MATCH PMS 286 C BLUE
FACES: 2051 BLUE PLEX
ILLUMINATION: SPARKLING BLUE NEON.
BUILDING HEIGHT = 220'
BUILDING LENGTH = 109.6'
220'x 109.6' = 24,112 SQ. FT.
24,112 SQ. FT x 5% = 1205.6 SQ. FT.
WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/32" = 1' -Q"
Northrop Grumman
Continental Blvd.
El Segundo, CA
THIS DESIGN IS THE EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OF WESTERN SIGN
d AWNI No. IT MAY NOT BE
REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR PART
WITHOUT WESTERN SIGN d AWNING'S
WRITTEN CONSENT.
ALL PRIMARY ELECTRICAL TO SIGN
LOCATION TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS.
DRAWN BYE
DATE: T116108
PRESENTED BY'.
RICHIE DEL GATTO
�USZflMER'•,APRRDYAL
DATE:.
REVISION
SHEET: 3 OF 7
FILE NUMBER
08.302
WMIIER OF — -
LI CrESA
l�
ti
TYPICAL ATTACHMENT DETAIL
SCALE: Yx "= V -0"
15MM SPARKLING
BLUE GRID NEON •RETAINER
O
BUILDING WALL
SPACED THROUCrlotrr
EVERY 4'
j
PLIX FACE
A
F`
,�7f
V
v� - �,� e i T� SFr
/
I���•
,
1 ;�s �
� °
��
8' -0"
I
-
_ GALVANIZED
LISTED DISCONAI =CT
FRONT VIEW
TRANSFORWIER BOX
OcTO wnE
SWTTCH W PRIMARY
PER PLATE)
LATEAD
tea. A PLATES PER IETTETI
NECK STAHD-0FT S
MM GRID NEON
-•:.1
C,MM1El LETTER
PLEX FACE
TOP VIEW
W t i T N slam
Northrop Grumman
----JOB LOCATION
Continental Blvd.
ElSegundo,CA
THIS DESIGN 15 THE EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OF WESTERN SIGN
6 AWNING. IT MAY NOT BE
REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR PART
WITHOUT WESTERN SIGN A AWNING'S
WRITTEN CONSENT.
ALL PRIMARY ELECTRICAL TO SIGN
LOCATION TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS.
DRAWN BY: %. W&4do.F
DATE: 7116108
PRESENTED BY
RICHIE DEL GATTO
-- CUSTOUVR APPROVAL
DATE:
REVISION
SHEET: 4 OF 7
FILE NUMBER
08.302
MENNER OF
Mcm
MEMBEq OF
© NEW MONUMENT SIGNS SCALE 1/2" = 1' -0"
MANUFACTURE AND INSTALL (2) S/F ILLUMINATED MONUMENT SIGNS
ALUMINUM ANGLE CONSTRUCTION
FACES ROUTED ALUMINUM BACKED WITH WHITE PLEX TOP NORTHROP LOGO ONLY
BOTTOM COPY ON GREY TO BE 280 -10 WHITE REFLECTIVE VINYL APPLIED FIRST SURFACE
TOP FACES AND EQUAL SIDES PAINT TO MATCH PMS 286 C BLUE
BOTTOM FACES AND EQUAL SIDES PAINT TO MATCH PMS 403 C GREY
ILLUMINATION FLUORESCENT TUBES AND BALLAST
121-01
YN t !• T N • 1 >v N
Northrop Grumman
JOB LOCATION
Continental Blvd.
El Segundo, CA
THIS DESIGN IS THE EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OF WESTERN SIGN
6 AWNING, IT WAY NOT BE
REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR PART
WITHOUT WESTERN SIGN & AWNING'S
WRITTEN CONSENT.
ALL PRIMARY ELECTRICAL TO SIGN
LOCATION TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS,
DRAWN BY: `'. */444. -
DATE: 7116108
PRESENTED BY:
RICHIE DEL GATTO
CUSTOMER APPROVAL
DATE:
REVISION
SHEET: S OF 7
FILE NUMBER
08.302
MEMBER OF
CrEA
i~
0
T
Z
s
a•
m
r
m
Gm!
C
2
v
N
v
m
Li
C}N
U
x
W
:• u V A -•
pt
O
D
m
I O
AF
l i
AF HAI
{
", "ur
�CA
n m
•
-
INA
�����}
z
1
rt=-
Y,t►r
w 13
m
mi
i -�
m
�1
D
W
:• u V A -•
i I
I
v
ch 0 0
WIZ
70 r
D Z
Z m
G7
m
m
O
D
m
I O
AF
l i
AF HAI
{
y
.r
�CA
n m
Z :'
o
�SAm
oo�TZ
z
rt=-
Y,t►r
w 13
m
mi
i -�
m
�1
D
co
'��i
fir "��•�
► _ �
v
NMI
i I
I
v
ch 0 0
WIZ
70 r
D Z
Z m
G7
m
Wet
m
O
D
m
I O
AF
l i
AF HAI
{
y
.r
�CA
n m
Z :'
o
�SAm
oo�TZ
z
rt=-
0
w 13
m
mi
s;
Z;
m
�1
D
co
Wet
SITE PLAN
r�
N
r44'L PAwl...i :CtiE ' 1
AM
Li LLJ u
u `�'
C, D, E, F
,m ca+nWn-., e.r
E, F
u u Erj
r-I u u t
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
NORTNROI GRI/MA/AN
