2006 MAR 21 CC PACKETAGENDA
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street
The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items
Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City- related business that is within the
jurisdiction of the City Council and /or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portion of the
Meeting During the first Public Communications portion of the Agenda, comments are limited to those items
appearing on the Agenda During the second Public Communications portion of the Agenda, comments may be made
regarding any matter within the jurisdiction of the City Council Additionally, the Public can comment on any Public
Hearing item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing portion of such item The time limit for comments is five (5)
minutes per person
Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state Your name and residence and the
organization you represent, if desired Please respect the time limits
Members of the Public may place items on the second Public Communications portion of the Agenda by submitting a
Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2 00
p m the prior Tuesday) Other members of the public may comment on these items only during this second Public
Communications portion of the Agenda The request must include a brief general description of the business to be
transacted or discussed at the meeting Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings
if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not exceed five (5) minutes
in length
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact City Clerk, 524 -2305. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to
make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 2006 - 5:00 P.M.
Next Resolution # 4461
Next Ordinance # 1393
5:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPOINTMENT OF LABOR NEGOTIATOR:
1 Consideration and possible action regarding appointing the City Manager as the City's labor negotiator
with regard to negotiating the employment contract between the Police Chief and the City
o1)j_
CLOSED SESSION:
The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government
Code Section §54960, et sue) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator, and /or
conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation, and /or discussing matters covered under
Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel), and /or confernng with the City's Labor Negotiators, as follows
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956 9(a)) — 2
matters
1 City of El Segundo v 2221 Park Place, LASC Case No BC319034
2 City of El Segundo v CTF2, Alaska, LASC Case No BC319033
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956 9(b) -4- potential cases (no further public
statement is required at this time), Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956 9(c) -0- matter
DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) — 0 matter
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54957 6) -1- matter
1 City Designated Representative City Manager
Unrepresented Employee Police Chief
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956 8) -0- matter
SPECIAL MATTERS — Council will move to open session at approximately 6 00 p m
1 Interview of candidates for the potential appointment to one position on the Capital Improvement Program Advisory
Committee (CIPAC) will be held in the West Conference Room, commencing at approximately 6 00 p m This
meeting is open to the public
2 002
AGENDA
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street
The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items
Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City- related business that is within the
jurisdiction of the City Council and/or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portion of the
Meeting During the first Public Communications portion of the Agenda, comments are limited to those items
appearing on the Agenda During the second Public Communications portion of the Agenda, comments may be made
regarding any matter within the jurisdiction of the City Council Additionally, the Public can comment on any Public
Hearing item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing portion of such item The time limit for comments is five (5)
minutes per person
Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state Your name and residence and the
organization you represent, if desired Please respect the time limits
Members of the Public may place items on the second Public Communications portion of the Agenda by submitting a
Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2 00
p m the prior Tuesday) Other members of the public may comment on these items only during this second Public
Communications portion of the Agenda The request must include a brief general description of the business to be
transacted or discussed at the meeting Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings
if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not exceed five (5) minutes
in lenoth
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact City Clerk, 524-2305. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to
make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 2006 - 7:00 P.M.
PLEASE NOTE: The public hearing for the Zone Text Amendment to amend the El
Segundo Municipal Code (ESMC) as follows: 1) add a new definition for "food service with
incidental retail" uses; 2) allow food services with incidental retail as a permitted use in the
Downtown Commercial (C -RS) Zone, Neighborhood Commercial (C -2) Zone, General
Commercial (C-3) Zone, and Commercial Center (C-4) Zone and as an accessory use in the
Corporate Office (CO) Zone; 3) add a parking ratio for food service with incidental retail; and
4) modify the parking ratio for food -to -go uses, has been canceled due to noticing issue.
Next Resolution # 4461
Next Ordinance # 1393
0 3
7:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION - Father Jim Anguiano of St Anthony Catholic Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Carl Jacobson
PRESENTATIONS -
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on
behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to
addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. While all
comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda The
Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is dosed
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda by title
Recommendation - Approval.
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Consideration and possible action regarding a presentation and discussion of
changes proposed by the Council R -1 Subcommittee to the El Segundo Municipal
Code Title 15 Chapter 4A regarding the development standards for the Single-
Recommendation - (1) Receive staff presentation, (2) Receive comments from public
regarding proposed changes to the R -1 zone development standards; (3) Direct staff to
proceed with the Zoning Code amendments and preparation of environmental review
documents; (4) Alternatively, discuss and take other actions related to this item.
4 0 4
2. Consideration and possible action regarding award of contract extensions to The
Jones Payne Group for design and testing services and to Wyle Laboratories, Inc.
for construction monitoring and oversight services related to the Residential
Sound Insulation (RSI) Program. (Fiscal impact: $1,746,659 to The Jones Payne
Group. Inc. and $200.100 to Wvle Laboratories. Inc.)
Recommendation - (1) Award a contract extension to The Jones Payne Group for
Design and Testing Services; (2) Award a contract extension to Wyle Laboratories, Inc.
for Construction Monitoring and Oversight Services; (3) Authorize the City Manager to
execute the contract extensions; (4) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related
to this item.
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
3. Consideration and possible action regarding the announcement of the
appointment of one candidate to the Capital Improvement Program Advisory
Committee (CIPAC).
Recommendation - (1) Announce the appointee to the CIPAC, if any, and term of office;
(2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item
4. Consideration and possible action on the Business Committee's recommendation
for a new City web page to attract new businesses to El Segundo, in coordination
with Shannon David, Inc., consultant for the project. (No current fiscal impact.
Total project of $125,000 previously approved on March 15, 2005)
Recommendation: (1) Receive and file presentation by staff and Shannon David, Inc.; (2)
Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously ff a call for discussion of
an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business
S. Warrant Numbers 2552267 to 2552475 on Register No. 11 in the total amount of
$1,677,740.17 and Wire Transfers from 2124/2006 through 3/09/2006 in the total
amount of $655,986.28
Recommendation - Approve Warrant Demand Register and authorize staff to release
Ratify Payroll and Employee Benefit checks, checks released early due to contracts or
agreement; emergency disbursements and/or adjustments; and wire transfers.
6. City Council Meeting Minutes of March 7, 2006.
Recommendation — Approval.
7. Consideration and possible action to retain URS Corporation to perform testing
and analysis of soil and gas beneath proposed athletic field and fire station sites
located along the north side of Mariposa Avenue between Nash and Douglas
Streets (827 N. Douglas Street) to update potential pollution risk assessments.
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Manager to sign a professional services
agreement approved as to form by the City Attorney; (2) Alternatively, discuss and take
other action related to this item.
8. Consideration and possible action regarding the award of a contract to Belaire-
West Landscape, Inc. for the re- grading and renovation of the Driving Range at the
Lakes Golf Course. (Fiscal Impact: $368,760)
Recommendation — (1) Award the contract to Belaire — West Landscape, Inc., (2)
Authorize the City Manager to execute a public works contract with Belaire -West
Landscape, Inc. for $368,760; (3) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to
this item.
9. Consideration and possible action to award a Public Works Contract to Trueline
for the surface refurbishment of seven (7) tennis courts and basketball court at
Recreation Park (339 Sheldon Street) in the amount of $31,960. Approved Capital
Improvement Project — Project No. PW 06-02. (Fiscal Impact: $36,754 - contract
and contingency)
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Manager to execute a Public Works contract
with Trueline in the amount of $31,960 to refurbish the tennis and basketball courts at
Recreation Park; (2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item
10. Consideration and possible action to approve a Professional Services Agreement
with BOA Architecture in the amount of $31,200 for professional architectural
design services for the remodel of the Human Resources office, the relocation of
the City Attorney's office, completion of the West Conference Room and new
seating and carpeting in the City Council Chambers. (Fiscal Impact: $34,320 —
agreement and contingency)
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services
Agreement, approved as to form by the City Attorney, with BOA Architecture in the
amount of $31,200; (2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
1 •
11. Consideration and possible action to approve the Facility Relocation Agreement
with the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for the relocation of a 45"
water main and the grant of an easement for the County Waterline in City property
in conjunction with the Douglas Street Gap Closure Project. (Fiscal Impact:
None)
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Manager to execute a Facility Relocation
Agreement with the Los Angeles Flood Control District; (2) Authorize the City Manager to
execute an easement document granting a pipeline easement to the Los Angeles Flood
Control District; (3) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
12. Consideration and possible action regarding the adoption of a Resolution
declaring the City's intent to conduct a public hearing on May 2, 2006 regarding
the transfer of a Pipeline Franchise Agreement, Ordinance No. 1255, from Equilon
California Pipeline Company LLC to Shell California Pipeline Company LLC and
extension of said Pipeline Franchise Agreement for a ten -year period. (Fiscal
Impact: $2,715 — annual franchise fee)
Recommendation — (1) Adopt a Resolution declaring the City's intent to conduct a public
hearing on May 2, 2006 regarding the transfer of a Pipeline Franchise Agreement,
Ordinance No. 1255, from Equdon California Pipeline Company LLC to Shell California
Pipeline Company LLC and extension of said Pipeline Franchise Agreement for a ten -
year period; (2) Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item.
13. Consideration and possible action on the Police Department utilizing up to
$72,000 of existing Citizens Option for Public Safety (COPS) grant funds to
operate on an overtime basis, special law enforcement details during the calendar
year. Additionally, purchase supplemental fitness equipment for the department
gym. (Fiscal Impact: $72,000 from COPS grant fund)
Recommendation — (1) Approve the use of COPS grant funds for special law
enforcement details and the purchase of gym equipment, (2) Alternatively, discuss and
take other action related to this item.
14. Consideration and possible action regarding adoption of a resolution authorizing
the Director of Planning and Building Safety to sign Notices of Completion for
projects completed under the Residential Sound Insulation Program.
Recommendation — (1) Adopt Resolution authorizing the Director of Planning and
Budding Safety to sign Notices of Completion related to Residential Sound Insulation
Protects; (2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
0 7
CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA
F. NEW BUSINESS
15. Consideration and possible action regarding - (1) Introduce an Ordinance to adopt
an amendment to the 2001 California Building Code requiring new residential units
to be in compliance with the requirements of the City's Residential Sound
Insulation program; (2) setting a second reading and adoption for April 4, 2006.
Recommendation — (1) Introduce an Ordinance amending the 2001 California Building
Code to add residential sound insulation standards; (2) Schedule second reading and
adoption for April 4, 2006; (3) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this
item.
16. Consideration and possible action regarding a new Alcoholic Beverage Control
(ABC) license for on -site sale and consumption of beer, wine and alcohol (Type
47) at a new restaurant located at 403 Main Street, EA No. 690 and AUP No. 05 -5.
Applicant: Kenneth R. Garmoe
Recommendation — (1) Determine that the City Council does not protest the issuance of
the new Type 47 ABC license at 403 Main Street, (2) Alternatively, discuss and take
other action related to this item.
G. REPORTS — CITY MANAGER — NONE
H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY — NONE
I. REPORTS — CITY CLERK
J. REPORTS — CITY TREASURER
K. REPORTS — CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member Boulgarides —
=40
Council Member Busch -
17. Consideration and possible action regarding a status report on technology
available for law enforcement regarding "Automatic License Plate Recognition
Systems" utilized for purposes of identifying vehicles that may be the subject of
unlawful activities or that have outstanding violations. (Fiscal Impact: None)
Recommendation - (1) Receive and file status report; (2) Alternatively, discuss and take
other action related to this item.
Council Member Jacobson -
Mayor Pro Tem Gaines -
Mayor McDowell -
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have receive value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on
behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to
addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250 While all
comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The
Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed
MEMORIALS -
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government
Code Section §54960, et sea) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator, and/or
conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation, and/or discussing matters covered under
Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel), and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators
REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required)
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED
DATE ////, /?('y�
TIME a ` `1� 9 ,
NAME
0 9
9
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 21, 2006
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding a presentation and discussion of changes
proposed by the Council R -1 Subcommittee, to the El Segundo Municipal Code Title 15
Chapter 4A regarding the development standards for the Single- Family Residential R -1
Zone (Fiscal Impact None)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION-
1 Receive staff presentation,
2 Receive comments from public regarding proposed changes to the R -1 zone
development standards,
3. Direct staff to proceed with the Zoning Code amendments and preparation of
environmental review documents, and /or
4. Alternatively, discuss and take other actions related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION.
On November 29, 2005 a special point meeting was held with the City Council and Planning
Commission to hear a presentation by the Council R -1 Subcommittee on proposed changes to
the development standards for the Single - Family Residential R -1 Zone The City Council
directed staff to continue with input from contractors, architects, engineers and brokers to
better define the parameters for the code changes, survey surrounding cities for examples of
their restrictions, and develop costs associated with the implementation of the proposed code
change with regard to the proposed requirements (Continued on next page ..)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1 Draft of Proposed Changes to the R -1 Zone Development Standards;
2 Survey of R -1 Development Standards from Surrounding Cities,
3 Survey of permitted single family homes with proposed FAR and Lot Coverage
4 Fiscal Model
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Operating Budget•
NIA
Amount Requested:
N/A
Account Number:
N/A
Project Phase.
N/A
Appropriation Required: _ Yes X No
ORATED BY: DATE:
Seimone Jurpsl!Director of Planning and Building Safety
0i0
1
STAFF REPORT: March 21, 2006 Page 2
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: (cont.)
Since the point meeting, the Council R -1 Subcommittee has held two meetings with contractors,
architects, engineers and brokers on December 19, 2005 and January 16, 2006. The purpose
of the meetings was to discuss the standards proposed at the point meeting and gain additional
input from individuals that would be actually designing and building the structures Following
the meetings, the subcommittee worked on further refining the standards and make changes
based on the input gained.
On March 13, 2006 the Council R -1 Subcommittee presented a new version of the proposed
changes to the public Additional input was gained from the meeting and the subcommittee
presents the changes this evening.
COST OF CHANGE
Staff has modeled a construction cost estimate for a new 3,300 sq.ft. single family dwelling.
Staff anticipates that the cost of framing a new dwelling unit with the proposed 2nd story
modulation requirements would increase the cost of framing by 15% A 15% increase was
added to item #120, Framing, Lumber, Labor This resulted in an increase of 3 4% to the
overall construction budget. This model serves as a model of average construction
RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE PROCESS
Planning and Building Safety staff recommends that the City Council receive comments from
the public regarding the proposed changes to the R -1 zone development standards and direct
staff to proceed with drafting the Zoning Code amendments and to prepare environmental
review documents subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
Once the final proposed changes to the R -1 Zone Development Standards have been drafted
and the environmental documents have been completed, staff will present the proposed
changes at public hearings before the Planning Commission and before the City Council
P \Planning & Building Safety\PROJECTS \R1Standards \R1 Standards CC PC Staff Report 03212006 doc
011
Proposed R -1 Zone Development Standards
Draft (3/21/06)
Note: Changes to development standards and new development standards are
shown in bold font If a development standard is not being changed it is not in
bold font
A. DWELLINGS
1. Height
2 stories, 26 feet in height to midpoint of roof. (no change)
2. Setbacks
a. Front Setbacks
Minimum 22 feet; Front facing garages must be setback a
minimum of 2 additional feet from the first floor building wall
unless the building has a porch, veranda, courtyard or deck at
least 8 feet in width by 4 feet in depth.
Combined Front and Rear Setback Minimum 30 feet (no change)
Permitted Front Setback Encroachments:
The following encroachments are permitted on the first floor in
the front setbacks only:
1) Porches or verandas not fully enclosed on three sides (railings
and /or columns permitted) may encroach into the front setback a
maximum of six feet in depth.
2) The first floor front facing exterior wall of a dwelling may
encroach up to 2 feet for a width not exceeding 30 feet when a
first floor porch or veranda, not fully enclosed on three sides, is
also projecting into the front setback. The total amount of
encroachment may not exceed six feet in depth combined for
both the dwelling and porch or veranda, for a maximum 50% of
the building width not to exceed 30 feet in width;
3) Courtyards (with walls not exceeding 42 inches in height within
the setback) may encroach into the front setback a maximum of
six feet and 50% of the building width not to exceed 20 feet;
4'
01
4) Raised decks not greater than 24 inches above grade
constructed in conjunction with an lattice deck cover not greater
than 10 feet above grade may encroach into the front setback a
maximum of six feet in depth and 50% of the building width not to
exceed 20 feet;
5) Lattice patio covers not greater than 10 feet above grade may
encroach into the front setback a maximum of six feet in depth
and 50% of the building width not to exceed 20 feet;
6) Architectural elements such as towers or turrets not greater
than 8 feet in diameter may encroach into the front setback a
maximum of 4 feet into the front setback;
7) Pergolas not greater than 10 feet in height that are attached to
the dwelling may encroach into the front setback a maximum of
six feet in depth and 50% of the width not to exceed 20 feet in
width;
8) An arbor or trellis, not exceeding 8 feet in height and 8 feet in
width may encroach into the front setback.
b. Side Setbacks
Existing =10% of lot width, 3 -foot minimum, 5 -foot maximum
Proposed
First Floor: 10% of lot width, minimum 3 feet, maximum 6 feet.
Second Floors Greater than 500 Sq.FT.: 10% of lot width
(minimum three (3) feet, maximum six (6) feet) plus the following:
1) 15% of the covered foot print area (including garages and
carports) of the ground floor, but not less than 200 sq. ft., must be
applied toward modulating the exterior perimeter walls on the
second floor.
2) Modulation of the second floor exterior perimeter walls must
occur on the side of the structure that faces the side yards.
3) The area to be modulated must be divided equally between
both side yards.
4) Modulation must be four (4) feet minimum to six (6) feet
maximum.
Z 013
A
5) No additional modulation is required if the face of the second
floor facing a side yard is set back from an amount that is equal
to the 10% of the lot width plus an additional four (4) feet.
6) If a only a portion of the second floor facing a side yard is set
back an amount that is equal to 10% of the lot width plus an
additional four (4) feet to six (6) feet, that portion may count
towards the area calculation required for item 1) above.
c. Rear Setbacks
Dwelling-
First Floor Minimum 5 feet. (no change)
Second Floor Minimum 5 feet (no change)
Note Accessory structures still must not be used for rental purposes.
1. Height
Eliminate restriction that can only be one floor. 1 story, 14 feet or 2
stories, 21 feet with greater setbacks (see setback section);
2. Setbacks
a. Front Setbacks
Minimum 22 feet (same as dwellings -no change)
Combined Front and Rear Setback: Minimum 30 feet. (same as
dwellings -no change)
b. Side Setbacks
Existing =10% of lot width, 3 -foot minimum, 5 -foot maximum
Proposed:
First Floor -10% of lot width, 3 -foot minimum, 6 -foot maximum
Second Floor -10% of lot width + two foot, 3 -foot minimum, 6 -foot
maximum
3
014
Rear 1/3 of propert y
Garages and accessory structures located on the rear 1/3 of the
property must be set back from the property line a minimum of
two feet.
c. Rear Setbacks
Existing 0 feet
Proposed:
First Floor: Minimum 3 feet.
Second Floor: Minimum 5 feet.
d. Rooftop Decks
Rooftop decks with required guard railings are permitted on
single -story accessory structures and on single -story portions of
2 -story accessory structures— rooftop deck guard rails must
maintain a setback of 10% of lot width + two foot; roof top decks
are not permitted on 2 -story accessory structures.
3. Placement of Buildings and Structures
No change to existing standards are proposed except that these
standards only apply to single -story accessory structures. These
standards do not apply for second floor accessory structures which have
to comply with the new accessory budding second floor setbacks
4. Accessory Structures - Bathrooms
A 1/2 bath (sink and toilet) is permitted but a full bathroom is not (same as
existing regulations in ESMC Section 154A- 6J.3.). Note that % baths
would be permitted for both single -story and 2 -story detached
accessory structures (see existing ESMC Section 15- 4A- 6J.3.). Also
note that a % bath would be permitted in an accessory structure and
a separate % bath would be permitted as part of a garage, whether
the garage is attached or detached to the accessory structure.
C. LOT COVERAGE (For All Structures — Includes Garages)
1. 35% for building(s) over 18 feet in height;
4 015
2. 43% for building(s) that are a mixture of one and two stories as
long as 60% of the total area of the building(s) does not exceed 18
feet in height;
3. 56% if building(s) do not exceed 18 feet in height;
D. FLOOR AREA RATIO (Floor Area Does Not Include Garage)
0.5 FAR for lots equal to or less than 8,000 square feet; .4 FAR for any
increment above 8,000 square feet.
EXCEPTION: The following areas will not be counted towards
the FAR: 1) Basements as long as 80% of the
exterior perimeter walls are fully below natural
grade; 2) Garages
E. PARKING
1. Number of Spaces
2 spaces in a fully enclosed garage or 3 spaces in a fully enclosed garage
if the dwelling exceeds 3,000 square feet in area (no change)
2. Parking Space Dimensions
10 feet wide by 20 feet deep (outside dimensions) per parking space (no
change)
3. Garage Orientation
Three -car garages that face the front property line where one of the
stalls is not tandem, either each garage stall must have a single -car
garage door or that portion of the building that contains one of the
three stalls must be set back 5 additional feet from the front of the
portion of the building that contains the other two stalls.
4. Garage Design Guidelines - Encouraged
a. Three -car garages may be constructed as attached or detached
structures at the rear of a lot and are encouraged.
b. Tandem parking for the third fully enclosed parking space is
encouraged.
5
016
c. Three -car garages facing the side property lines are
encouraged.
5. Vehicle -Lift
On lots less than 45' in width, one vehicle -lift may be used to meet
the requirements for a three -car garage by substituting the second
garage space for a lift that will stack two vehicles vertically.
Resulting in three parked vehicles. Minimum ceiling height is 14'.
F. DRIVEWAYS AND CURB CUTS
1. Driveway and curb cut cannot exceed 20 feet in width for lots less
than 50 feet wide (New Standard).
2. Width of driveway and curb cut cannot exceed 50% of the lot width
for lots 50 feet or greater in width (New Standard).
G. LANDSCAPING
1. A minimum of 25% of the front setback area must be landscaped for
all lots less than 50 feet in width in the R -1 Zone. (New Standard)
2. A minimum 35% of the front setback area must be landscaped for all
lots that are 50 feet or greater in width in the R -1 Zone. (New
Standard).
K ENCROACHMENTS
In addition to existing permitted encroachments:
1. Add porches, verandas, decks, courtyards, towers, turrets in the
front yard setback as specified in front setback encroachments
listed above.
2. Add arbors, trellises, pergolas and lattice patio /deck covers in the
first floor front yard setback as specified in front setback
encroachments listed above.
3. Add bay windows on the second floor facing the front property
line only.
4. Add fireplaces on the interior side yard setback but the
encroachment may not reduce the setback to less than a
minimum of 3 feet.
6
017
5. Add shutters, corbels, dentils up to 6 inches in depth to the
existing list of architectural elements in ESMC Section 15- 2 -7A1.
6. Add columns up to 1 foot in depth to the existing list of
architectural elements in ESMC Section 15- 2 -7A1.
I. ACCESSORY OUTDOOR SHOWERS
J.
Accessory outdoor showers attached to a building wall are permitted.
They may not encroach in a setback and may not be roofed. They may
be enclosed on 3 sides.
Add the following definitions:
1. Arbor: A shelter of shrubs and branches or of latticework
intertwined with plant material usually comprised of climbing
vines and flowers.
2. Courtyard: A court that is open to the sky and is adjacent to or
within a building mostly or entirely surrounded by walls and /or
buildings on all 4 sides.
3. Deck: An open, unroofed porch or platform extending from a
house or other building.
4. Lattice: A structure of interwoven, crossed strips arranged to
form a regular pattern of open spaces that is usually made of
wood or metal.
5. Landscape: Any lawn, tree, bush and ground cover in areas
designed to be permanently maintained and permeable.
6. Pergola: A structure of parallel colonnades supporting an open
roof of beams and crossing rafters or trelliswork, over which
climbing plants are trained to grow.
7. Porch: A covered platform that is an exterior appendage to a
building, usually having a separate roof from the building, that
7 018
may have railings and /or supporting columns, which forms a
covered entrance or vestibule to a doorway.
8. Porte- cochere: A porte - cochere is a porch roof projecting over a
driveway at or adjacent to the entrance to a building that shelters
those getting in and out of vehicles.
9. Single -Story: Structure no higher than 18 feet to upper most
point.
10. Stoop: A raised platform that is approached by steps at the
entrance to a building. A stoop may have a roof projecting out
from the building wall over the building entrance that does not
have any columns supporting it.
11.Tower: A building or structure, usually round or square in plan
and characteristically taller than its diameter, forming a part of a
larger building and is often located at a corner of the building.
12.Turret: A small, slender ornamental tower that begins above
ground level that usually projects from a corner of the building to
which it is attached.
13.Trellis: A system of horizontal latticework supported on posts,
designed to support growing vines and plants.
14.Veranda: A large, open porch, usually roofed and partly
enclosed, as by a railing, often extending across the front and
sides of a house.
8 019
SURVEY OF R -1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FROM SURROUNDING CITIES
T_ T Architectural
Setbacks & Lot Projections &
(CITIES Ogen Space Helaht Coverage Parking Parking Desl n I Modulations Min Lot Size
Review
- �- - t — — � min 1000 -
SF living
area & for
20' front, side lots < 8,000(
2 covered within
not less than 2 -story max garage or SF a max 18 -inch into
14', rear 10', @ Irving area req'd yards, 24-
10% of lot sizel 26 of 1,500 carport for inch max into
midpoint & 30' dwelling w/ 5 or
(Culver City req'd Open SF+ max yards for roof 5,000 SF
Space but no Lot to highest less bedrooms
eaves,
, t
ridgehne or 1 add'( space for
Tess than 600 Coverage Archdectural
lSF w/ min 10' top of parapet 40% each bedroom in Review
dimension excluding lexcess
garage or
r - — — — storage — -- -- —
shed
frOn110% Of
depth (max 2 off - street
10' & min 5'), (parking spaces
side 10% of + 1 guest space,
width not less including
than T& not> ladddional space
5',rear 5' 1st Lot for servants' 4,000 SF
Hermosa Beach 25' Coverage
floor & 3' 2nd 65% quarters or
floor, alley guesthouse,
rear 3' 1 st & V max storage 4001
2nd Open SF, Tandem
Space req'd parking
25% of lot permitted
area
lots >4800 w 65 forl
R
20' front, side max 3' x two
1° &FAR 7 (chimney w/ 14'
101° of lot 2 -car garage for architectural for lots w/ < height in req'd
width 3' mm < 3600 SF & 3- elements
4,800 SF, setback, all
need not carfor> 400 SF req'd sloped
exceed 5', 26' outside FAR roof equipment dfrom roofs, bay
(garage max&
includes screened from
Manhattan rear 30% of lot face of ° of view Garage 200 SF storage windows,
Beach depth min 10' exterior wall & 50 /° max min 9' awnings, roof 7,500 SF
1& max rear two -story habitable windows
gargewidth No eaves,
25', front req'd
space in > than 40% of req'd,surface of
� basement roof deck or cormces, 'lls,
open space & max 200 street frontage balcony must buttresses,
mm 8% of lot SF storage (for vehicle use be 9' below balconies, or
size excluded in height limit Patios
�� basement
I I I I I I I I
0410
P \Planning & Building Safety\PRO.IECTS \R1Standards \BULK STANDARDS Page 1
021
P \Planning & Building Safety\PROJECTS \R1Standards \BULK STANDARDS Page 2
SURVEY OF R -1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FROM SURROUNDING CITIES
j-
FIF
Architectural
Setbacks &
Height
Lot
Coverage/
Parking
Proiectrons & `
Modulations
Min Lot Size
(CITIES
Open Space
FAR
Design
20' front lst�
Review
(Floor & fro nt
FAR bonuses
30' for 2nd
for porches,
(floor, 5' side
2 -car garage
(garages @'
Redondo Beach or 10% lot 30' -2 story
FAR 651
min & 800 SF
rear or side 2nd floor 8' for
5,000 SF
Iwidth,20% of max
accessory
Ioaded,Design 15' length
depth min
(max
use area
review for all
15',max 30%
new additions
hardscapein
&construction
front setback
T
Tfront 20' or
—
—
(average with
min 15', front
facing garage
chimneys ,
fa 20' min
(Min 10'x 15'
reenhouse
(windows, roof
�
max total
open space or
FAR 61,
accessory
eaves, porches
w/ patio
Lot
(structure 1000
& balcomes 2'-
Torrance
enclosed on
18' one -story,
max 2 sides,
Coverage
ISF w/ SF
6" min clear to
property line,
J 27' two -story
10 /a lot
50% &
700
not parking @
(Public Hearing
(side
less
40% max
(rear 114 of lot 1'
width not
than 5' for lots
for 2 -story
from rear & 3'
from
req'd for
Hillside
50', rear lttry
side
Overlay Area
15' average
remodel or newt
not less than
construction
0
avve age of
—, — —
less than 15'
—
max 1 story
high porte-
cochere w/ 20'
length @ 2 5/
5' side setback, No detached
max 30" or carport is
�encroachment 50% allowed in the
20' front, side
max total
laccessory
front or street
within setback
Ontario
35' two an
rhalfstory
Lot
Coverage
I structure 1,050
side yard
area Carports
7,201SF,000
&75/10' 2nd max
50%
SF w/ 650 SF
balconies
must be
floor, rear 20'
not parking
stairwells,
porte- screened from
cocheres, public view w/
(Planning (solid 6' high
block wall
(Commission
Design review
req'd for new 5
or more unit
021
P \Planning & Building Safety\PROJECTS \R1Standards \BULK STANDARDS Page 2
SURVEY OF R -1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FROM SURROUNDING CITIES
� A
Architectural
CITIES H
Setbacks & L
Lot P
Parkin M
Prolections &
Modulations Min Lot Size
—� O
Ooen Soace �
FAR —
—g D
Design
Review
front 20% of
(lot d
City B
depth but (
2 -car garage or s
(The C
B i
not> t
offstreet parking M
max f
Mass,
Los Angeles side 5
FAR 3 1 a
area + 1 space (
yard E
Envelope, 5,000 SF
& or max eig for each 2 ec s w - articulation, &
2nd floor for Iguestrooms up platforms, other control
lots 50' wide, methods
rear 15'
18' from
existing grade
combined to the average
front & rear of the highest
130'w/ min 22' gable if 1 story ) Lot Archdectural
in front, side & 26' for 2- Coverage 2' max front Features
El Segundo o story from 40% & 2 -car garage yard horizontal Req'd 5,000 SF
10 /o of lot existing grade 47% if 1 encroaching, windows,
(width min 3' to the average) stry cornices
and max 5',
rear 8' mm of the highest
gable, 6' from
average to the
peak of ridge
022
P \Planning & Building Safety \PROJECTS \R1 Standards \BULK STANDARDS Page 3
022
P \Planning & Building Safety \PROJECTS \R1 Standards \BULK STANDARDS Page 3
Sample Survey of Homes in the Single - Family Residential (R -1) Zone with Proposed FAR and Lot Coverage Applied
No
Address
Total Lot
Size In
Square
Feet
Total
Bull ding
Sldi
(Including
garage) In
Square Feet
Total
Building w/o
Garage
Floor
Area
Ratio
(2 -Story)
Maximum
Building
Size with
35% Lot
Coverage
(HYBRID)
Maximum
Building Size
with 43% Lot
Coverage with
50% Building
Area Heights 18'
or Less One and
Two Story
(1-Story)
Maximum
Building Size
with 56% Lot
Coverage
Proposed with
Building Height
18' or Less
(Proposed)
Total Building
Size with Floor
Area Ratio (FAR)
0 50 for first
8,000 sq It and
0.4 FAR for any
Increment over
8,000 sq ft
(Proposed)
1
631 W Maple Ave
7,570
3,913
3,313
044
5,299
4,882
4,239
3,785
2
861 Bungalow Dr
7,381
6,361
5,761
078
5,167
4,761
4,133
3,691
3
863 Bungalow Or
7,666
3,780
3,180
041
5,367
4,945
4,293
3,8331
4
1242 E Maple Ave
13,920
9,336
8,736
063
9,744
81978
7,795
6,368
5
1404 E Maple Ave
5,428
4,040
3,440
063
3,799
3,501
3,039
2,714
6
725 Center St
7,381
4,341
3,741
051
5,167
4,761
4,133
3,691
7
213 E Acacia Ave
6,975
3,913
3,313
047
4,883
4,499
3,906
3,488
8
851 Virginia St
6,702
3,913
3,313
049
4,691
4,322
3,753
3,351
9
627 Whiting St
10,000
5,983
5,383
054
7,000
6,450
5,600
4,800
10
757 Bungalow Or
6,588
3,680
3,080
047
4,612
4,249
3,689
3,294
11
708 Lomita Street
6,480
3,684
3,084
048
4,536
4,180
3,629
3,240
12
640 Lomita Street
6,420
3,394
2,794
044
4,494
4,141
3,595
3,210
13
418 W Maple Ave
5,035
3,497
2,897
058
3,525
3,248
2,820
2,518
14
805 Virginia Street
5,361
2,880
2,280
043
3,753
3,458
3,002
2,681
15
725 Canter St
6,588
3,902
3,302
050
4,612
4,249
3,689
3,294
16
752 Bunglow Dr
6,588
4,117
3,517
053
4,612
4,249
3,689
3,294
uz,;
FISCAL MODEL
LINE ITEM COST BREAKDOWN
Project Single Family Residence
Size 3300
COST
ONSITES
COSTS /SF
AVERAGE
PERCENTOF
CODE
VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION
$ 500
COSTS
I
COSTS
I
103
COSTS
$ 1 32
$ 4,361
077%
1o1
Appliances
$ 1236
$ 40,755
718%
1o2
Cabinets
$ 500
$ 16,500
291%
103
Ceramic Tile
$ 1 32
$ 4,361
077%
1o4
Cleanup, Rou h
$ 046
$ 1,532
027%
105
Cleanup, Final
$ 043
$ 1,414
025%
lob
Concrete Foundation
$ 1200
$ 39,600
697%
107
Countertops Cultured Marble
$ 150
$ 4,950
087%
108
Countertops Granite
$ 446
$ 14,709
269%
log
Drywall
$ 436
$ 14,379
253%
110
Electrical - Rough
$ 443
$ 14,614
257%
111
Electrical - Finish
$ 300
$ 9,900
174%
112
Electrical Light Fixtures
$ 052
$ 1,709
030%
113
Finish Carpentry, Finish Hardware & Ward Doors
$ 438
$ 14,438
254%
114
Fireplaces Metal
$ 044
$ 1,461
026%
11s
Fire S rinMer System
$
$
000%
116
Flooring, Carpet
$ 200
$ 6,600
1 16%
117
Flooring, Ceramic Tile
$ 250
$ 8,250
145%
118
Flooring, Vin I
$
$
000%
119
Flooring, Wood
$ 500
1 $ 16,500
291%1
12o
Framing, Labor, Lumber & Hardware
$ 3100
$ 102,300
1802%
121
Framing, Trusses
$ 1 20
$ 3,960
070%
122
Gutter & Downspouts
$ 016
$ 530
009%
123
Garage Doors & Openers
$ 018
$ 589
010%
124
HVAC
$ 275
$ 9,075
160%
125
Insulation
$ 100
$ 3,300
058%
126
Light Weight Concrete
$ 143
$ 4,714
083%
127
Mailboxes
$ 017
$ 566
010%
128
Mason
$ 071
$ 2,357
042%
129
Ornamental Iron
$ 071
$ 2,357
042%
130
Painting - Exterior
$ 086
$ 2,829
050%
131
Painting - Interior
$ 223
$ 7,354
130%
132
Pest Control
$
$
000%
133
Plastering
$ 457
$ 15,086
266%
134
Plumbing - Rough
$ 706
$ 23,312
411%
135
Plumbing - Finish
$ 300
$ 9,900
174%
136
Roofing
$ 125
$ 4,125
073%
137
Security & Home Audio Prewire
$ 464
$ 15,321
270%
138
Sheet Metal
$ 014
$ 471
008%
139
Shower Doors & Mirrors
$ 097
$ 3,206
056%
140
Structural Steel
$ 071
$ 2,357
042%
141
Tubs
$ 171
$ 5,657
100%
142
Waterproofing / Hot Mop Shower Pans
$ 049
$ 1,603
028%
143
Waterproofing Decking
$ 0 89
$ 2,946
052%
144
Windows
$ 4,57
$ 15,086
266%
145 JSubtotaf $ 136 57 $ 450,674
7937%
4s
Conlin enaes O6%
$ 8 19
$ 27,040
4 76%
147
Profl +Overhead 20°10
$ 2731
$ 90,135
1587%
147 TOTALS $ 17208 1 $ 567,849
-10000%
M /SF 15% 120
$ 141 22
$ 8 47
$ 28 24
$ 177 93
Total Change 34%
024
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE. March 21, 2006
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding award of contract extensions to The Jones Payne
Group for design and testing services and to Wyle Laboratories, Inc for construction
monitoring and oversight services related to the Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program
(Fiscal impact $1,746,659 to The Jones Payne Group, Inc and $200,100 to Wyle
Laboratories, Inc)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION.
1) Award a contract extension to The Jones Payne Group for Design and Testing Services,
2) Award a contract extension to Wyle Laboratories, Inc for Construction Monitoring and
Oversight Services, 3) Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract extensions, and
4) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this Item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
At its meeting of November 5, 2003, the City Council awarded agreements to The Jones
Payne Group for provision of Design and Testing services and Wyle Laboratories, Inc for
provision of Construction Monitoring and Oversight Services Both agreements were awarded
for a period of one (1) year, with the City's discretion of extending the agreement in one (1)
year increments for a maximum of three (3) years At its meeting on February 15, 2005, the
City Council awarded one year extensions on both contracts
(continued on next page)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Scope of services for The Jones Payne Group, Inc
Proposal from The Jones Payne Group, Inc
Proposal from Wyle Laboratories, Inc
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget. $600,000
Amount Requested: $1,946,759
Account Number- 116 - 400- 0000 -6214
Appropriation Required* X Yes _ No
ORIGINATED- DATE: March
Seimone Jurlis, erector of Planning and Bulldino Safetv
DATE- _VtS
025
2
Background and Discussion (con't):
Staff has requested that both The Jones Payne Group, Inc and Wyle Laboratories, Inc submit
proposals for an additional year of service to cover 300 homes
The Jones Payne Group has submitted a proposal for $1,679,099 for design work related to
the City's accelerated Residential Sound Insulation Program, which will cover design work for
between 300 and 350 homes This design work will include architectural assessments,
acoustical testing at 10% of the homes, Property Owner reviews, and Punch List inspections,
and for the first time, designs for mechanical systems Designs by The Jones Payne Group,
Inc for mechanical systems vs a "design -build" approach by contractors, will enable a more
competitive process for construction With approval of this proposal, design work will
commence on Group 11 (25 homes) the week of April 17, 2006 Additionally, The Jones
Payne Group, Inc has been providing additional support since early December 2005 for
construction management on ongoing construction of Groups 5, 6, 7, and 8 Due to the
announcement of the settlement agreement, additional support staff was needed immediately
to deal with the day to day issues related to construction The Jones Payne Group, Inc has
submitted a proposal for $67,560 for these services which are expected to be needed through
completion of Group 8 as City staff looks to fill the two Construction Coordinator positions
approved by City Council on December 20, 2005
Wyle Laboratories, Inc has submitted a proposal for a time and materials contract extension
with an amount not to exceed $200,100 in support of the City's accelerated RSI Program
This will cover Construction Monitoring and Oversight (to complywith FAA grant requirements)
for the Program
026
of El
RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM
Scope of Services Document
February 27, 2006
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Jones Payne Team (JPG) will provide Program Management, Acoustic
Design, Architectural /Engineering Design, and Construction Support services for
the City of El Segundo's Residential Sound Insulation Program The Team will
be responsible for performing the acoustical treatment recommendation services
for 300 -350 homes within the vicinity of the City of El Segundo
The JPG team of consultants will be responsible for all services involved in the
management and technical aspects of the Sound Insulation Program The scope
of services provided by the consultant team is outlined below, and will include
• Program Planning and Administration Support
• FAA / Agency Coordination Support
• Acoustical Criteria and Guidelines
• Architectural / Engineering Design
• Manufacturer / Technical Liaison
• Procurement and Bidding
• Construction Phase Services Support
• Program Evaluation and Closeout
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of work that has been developed for Work Order Three (3) of the program
includes Design through Construction Support services for up to 350 Properties The
300 -350 properties to be sound insulated in Work Order Three (3) will be packaged into
12 bid groups The fees for Task 6 are based on all parcels being available for
assessment durations noted in the attached schedule The fees for tasks 6 1, 6 5, 10 2
are based specifically on the following assumptions If the actual housing stock differs
from these assumptions, payment for additional services will be per Schedule B
Unit Type Unit Count SF Assumptions
Single Family Unknown 1.500 — 2.000°
Condominium/Townhouse Unknown 1,000 - 1,500
Apartments Unknown < 1,000°
Note that the duration of the base contract and the attached fees have been based on
the attached schedule If the base contract duration, or the duration of the construction
contracts extend 4 weeks or more beyond the planned completion dates for reasons
beyond the consultants control, services will be provided in a mutually agreed upon level
of effort per the fee schedule attached (Appendix A)
027
City of El Segundo
RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM
Scope of Services Document
February 27, 2006
WORKORDER NO. 3 — SOUND INSULATION OF 300 -350 UNITS
TASK 1: PROGRAM PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION
Task 1.2 Program Kick -off Meeting
JPG will participate in a program kick -off meeting with the City staff to discuss the
current program and the results of our review of existing program documents, and to
review the proposed program approach, tasks and schedule
Task 1.5 Master Program Schedule
JPG will prepare for review by the City a Master Program Schedule that contains
all tasks and subtasks and their respective durations and interdependencies. The
Schedule will be prepared using Microsoft Project, 2002 version Periodic
updates will be prepared as required
Task 1.9 Coordinate with City Staff
JPG will coordinate with the City on a bi- weekly basis Specific coordination activities
will include homeowner selection & notification, issues pertaining to design status,
homeowner meetings, bidding procedures, contractor procurement and selection
activities, and FAA reporting requirements
Task 1.10 Program Management and Coordination
The JPG will provide oversight and management for all task related services identified
by Tasks 2 — 11, below In addition JPG will manage and coordinate all team sub
consultants including acoustical, environmental, mechanical, electrical and structural for
the duration of Work Order Three (3) Management and coordination will include project
procedures, policies, reporting and communications both written and verbal
TASK 4: FAA / AGENCY COORDINATION
Task 4.1 Progress Reporting
The JPG Team will provide a series of monthly progress reports to the City An annual
program report will be prepared summarizing program accomplishments during the
current program year, with program forecasts and budgets for the remainder of the
program For purposes of this contract, the annual report will be based upon completion
of the above - mentioned Work Order
Task 4.2 Coordination with Local Building Officials
Budding code requirements will be reviewed with the local Budding Officials A
summary of the Uniform Budding Code (California Budding Code) requirements
will be prepared for inclusion in the Program Policy and Procedures Manual, and
028
City of El Segundo
RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM
Scope of Services Document
February 27, 2006
reviewed with current budding officials to ensure that they reflect all requirements
for the sound insulation program
TASK 5: ACOUSTICAL CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES
Task 5.3 Provide Acoustical Recommendations
The JPG Team's acoustical consultant will review the acoustical recommendations for all
properties
TASK 6: ARCHITECTURAL / ENGINEERING DESIGN
Task 6.1 Site Visits — Architectural Assessment
The JPG Team will receive from the City of El Segundo a schedule of the initial
assessment visits for all 300 -350 eligible properties Each homeowner who elects to
participate, as indicated by the City, will be included in the assessment phase
The JPG Team will conduct assessment visits for those residences electing to
participate The assessment team will include a team leader /construct -ability inspector
and a drafter The team will prepare floor plans and create door and window schedules
for each of the participating homes
Based upon the acoustical treatment guidelines, preliminary recommendations for
acoustical improvements to the house will be prepared and discussed with the
homeowner
Task 6.2 Site Visits — Mechanical / Electrical Assessment
The JPG Team will conduct M / E system evaluations for residences during the
architectural assessment visit outlined in Task 6 1, above Existing mechanical and
electrical systems will be documented and schematic plans prepared to provide FAU
replacement, air conditioning, ventilation systems and possible electrical upgrades
Task 6.4 Site Visits — Pre - Construction Acoustical Testing
The JPG Team will conduct pre - construction acoustical testing on 20% of the residences
in the program identified by Task 61, above and as prescribed in the previously
submitted Acoustical Testing Plan The team will conduct acoustical testing in
accordance with FAA requirements and procedures set forth by ASTM E966 "Standard
Guide for Field Measurements of Airborne Sound Insulation of Building Facades and
Budding Elements " Simultaneous measurements will be taken of the exterior and
interior noise levels using an artificial noise source to determine the noise reduction
(Noise Reduction) in decibels (dBA) of the wall / window assemblies Between 3 -5
rooms in each house will be testing. The NR values will determine the level of acoustical
improvement necessary to meet the program goals
01L�)
of El
RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM
Scope of Services Document
February 27, 2006
Task 6.5 Treatment Concept Packet
The JPG Team will analyze the specific needs of the individual residences and
recommend acoustical treatments necessary to improve the NR performance to meet
the program standard A preliminary design package for each home will be prepared
The design package will include plan(s), photo elevations, door and window schedules,
preliminary mechanical, fresh air upgrades and electrical upgrades, as required These
packages will be reviewed with each homeowner for comment Exceptions taken by the
homeowners will be brought to the attention of the City The attached fee proposal
reflects our completing Treatment Concept Packets on all 300 -350 properties
Task 6.6 Prepare Homeowner Agreements
The JPG Team will meet with the City to identify those properties to be "fast- tracked ", in
moving forward with bid documents and construction During this period, those
properties with special conditions (code or structural), requiring remedial work to be
done, will be placed on hold until issues can be resolved The JPG will meet with and
review the concept packets with the homeowners, and will prepare homeowner
agreements for each participating property The homeowner agreement will identify the
treatment recommendations, as revised, along with items of "pre- work" that the
homeowner must perform in order to install the acoustical treatments These may
include code infractions not eligible for FAA funding The scope of work documents will
be attached as an exhibit to the "Homeowner Participation Agreements" for the
Residential Sound Insulation Program for signature by the homeowner(s) A probable
cost of construction will be provided for review with the property owner
Task 6.8 Prepare Final Design Documents (70% Plans
The JPG Team will prepare final design documents for each property and bid group
including plans, schedules showing door and window types, finishes and colors, possible
ceiling or wall modifications, mechanical or ventilation systems or electrical upgrades
and special details not contained in the standard set These documents will be
submitted for review by all appropriate agencies
Task 6.9 Prepare Bid Documents and Final Estimate
The JPG Team will prepare final Bid Documents including plans, schedules, standard
details, special details, technical specifications, general conditions and special
provisions of the contract as necessary to publicly solicit bids and construct the
recommended acoustical treatments A Final Estimate will be prepared for each bid
package based on the final number of homes to be incorporated into the bid sets. JPG
will meet with the homeowners to review the final 100% scope of work
The JPG Team will prepare one original stamped copy of the final Bid Documents for
reproduction by the City of El Segundo to be distributed to contractors interested in
bidding
tJO
City of El Segundo
RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM
Scope of Services Document
February 27, 2006
TASK 9: PROCUREMENT AND BIDDING
Task 9.2 Pre -Bid Conference
The City of El Segundo will schedule and conduct the Pre -Bid Conferences with
assistance from JPG The primary agenda will be to present requirements and
responsibilities involved in the Residential Sound Insulation Program, as well as, discuss
administrative requirements and bid procedures to interested contractors for each bid
group JPG staff will present acoustical and ventilation treatments, specifications and
typical scopes of work as outlined by the Contract Documents
Task 9.4 Prepare Addenda
The JPG Team will coordinate any clarifications that may arise from questions raised at
the Pre -Bid Conference and/ or the house tour Written clarifications or addendum to the
bid documents will be issued, as required
Task 9.5 Tabulate & Analyze Contractor's Bids
JPG will provide assistance on an as- needed basis to tabulate contractor bids received,
review bids for completeness and conformance with the established bid requirements,
and identify the apparent low bidder for the construction contract
TASK 10: CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
Task 10.1 Pre - Construction Conference
The City of El Segundo, with assistance from JPG, will schedule a Pre - Construction
Conference for each bid package in the Program for the purpose of introducing the
General Contractor and its Subcontractors to the City, JPG & Wyle Team The General
Provisions and Special Conditions of the Contract, related administrative matters, such
as weekly payroll submittals and affirmative action compliance will be reviewed
Task 10.2 Pre- Construction Walk Through
The City of El Segundo shall schedule with the Contractor, its Subcontractors, JPG and
the Homeowners and shall conduct a pre - construction walk- through for all homes in
each bid package for the purpose of reviewing the existing conditions and scope of work
as contained in the Contract Documents The JPG shall answer questions related to the
work to be performed and issue a written summary of items discussed and conclusions
reached
Task 10.3 Review Submittals / Shop Drawings
The JPG Team will receive protect submittals, shop drawings and technical information
from the contractor to review conformance of information provided with the acoustical,
architectural, and mechanical or ventilation concepts (as required) set forth in the
Contract Documents, and as may be modified by the Pre - Construction Walk- throughs
The City of El Segundo will coordinate the processing of all administrative submittals
including bonds, insurances, and related contractual matters
0.31
City of El Segundo
RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM
Scope of Services Document
February 27, 2006
Task 10.4 Attend Construction Progress Meetings
The City of El Segundo will conduct weekly construction progress meetings to be held at
a to- be- determined location for each bid group The Contractor, all Subcontractors, Wyle
staff and JPG will attend the meetings Meeting minutes will be recorded and distributed
weekly by the City of El Segundo
Task 10.5 Construction Observation
The City of El Segundo's designated Construction Manager will be the primary point of
contact with Contractors, Homeowners and City staff during the construction period The
JPG Construction Administrator will conduct one site visit to each residence concurrent
with Task 10 8 for all residences in the program JPG will schedule the visits in concert
with Wyle to provide maximum opportunity to observe critical construction details and
installations A Field Report will be prepared for each scheduled site visit documenting
construction activity, status, and key observations
Task 10.6 Review & Process Construction Changes
The JPG Team will receive Requests for Information (RFI's) from Wyle Engineers, and
will promptly render interpretations necessary for proper execution and progress of the
work.
Wyle's Construction Manager will coordinate closely with the City of El Segundo on
RFI's that result in changes to the construction The City of El Segundo will prepare
change orders
Task 10.8 Substantial Completion Walk- through
The City of El Segundo with assistance from JPG & Wyle Engineers will conduct a
comprehensive walk- through for each residence to observe the work and to determine if
the project is substantially complete and ready for punch list A Notice of Project
Completion will be prepared for issuing to the Contractor, the homeowner, JPG, and
Wyle
TASK 11: PROGRAM EVALUATION AND CLOSEOUT
Task 11.2 Post - Construction Acoustical Testing
The JPG Team will conduct post - construction acoustical testing for those homes pre-
tested and sound insulated by the program using the methodology established by the
acoustical testing plan in order to verify that the performance of acoustical treatments
meets the airport's program goals Test results will be recorded, and the acoustical
engineer will prepare and execute a Certificate of Program Completion for each structure
for forwarding to the FAA. Post - construction tests and findings will be added to the
database
Task 11.3 Prepare Final Program Report
03�
City of El Segundo
RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM
Scope of Services Document
February 27, 2006
JPG will assist the City of El Segundo in the preparation of a Final Program Report for all
participating dwellings that summarizes the program experience from a cost analysis,
acoustical performance, and homeowner perceptions based upon both the pre -, and
post -, construction survey
TERM
The term of this Contract shall be for the period commencing with the date of the
executed contract and expiring not later than twenty -nine (29) months after said
execution The term of this Agreement may be extended by the mutual written consent
of City and Consultant
033
E
0)
O
IL
c
o a
09 0
O N
d D = O A
W O D N
N m
m
L
L
d
t0
O
H
O
a
b l "l I (A
0 0 0
LM rn rn
a6 rn rn c�
J O O M
to b9 fA !9
O O o O
N -c R N
a N o N m
O O
to M H) to
6 c7 � N f7
E
(D D O
C cn 6 O t0
N
d
O fA » to fA
'J' z
'= 3
o
o O
in y
0 Q
o W
M D_'
V m
w W
W
y LL
K J
M F
y O
D
O
Y
O
3
y
E
rn
a
h
j
c
o
M
N
m
V
M
N
O
�
N
cN)
b l "l I (A
0 0 0
LM rn rn
a6 rn rn c�
J O O M
to b9 fA !9
O O o O
N -c R N
a N o N m
O O
to M H) to
6 c7 � N f7
E
(D D O
C cn 6 O t0
N
d
O fA » to fA
'J' z
'= 3
o
o O
in y
0 Q
o W
M D_'
V m
w W
W
y LL
K J
M F
y O
D
O
Y
O
3
y
E
rn
a
h
j
c
E
h
m
E
E
Q
m
O
d
d
LL
C
O
N
N
d
Q
a
co
O
O
Q1
:l
d
U
W
H
O
z
E
a
E
J
uj
w
W
LL
J
Q
O
F-
034
035
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
The City of El
Segundo
THE JONES PAYNE GROUP, INC
POSITION
4101104 - 3/31105
4101105 - 3131106 4101106 - 3131107
4101107- 3131108
Principal -in- Charge
$174
$183
$192
$202
Project Architect
$137
$144
$151
$159
Construction Admin
$86
$90
$95
$100
Project Manager
$85
$89
$94
$99
Job Captain
$56
$59
$62
$65
Drafter
$50
$53
$56
$59
Resident Inspector
$68
$71
$75
$79
Project Administrator
$72
$75
$79
$83
035
laboraftrim
February 27, 2006
To City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Attention- Mr James O'Neill
Program Coordinator
Proposal Number: 580.06.048
Subject Proposal for Construction Support Services
Reference Request of February 16, 2006
Dear Mr O'Neill
In response to the reference request, Wyle Laboratories is pleased to submit this Time and
Material proposal for the estimated amount of $200,100 for the for continued Construction
Monitoring and Oversight Services of the City of El Segundo's Residential Sound Insulation
Program Schedule 1 details our costs by Tasks The costs included herein are for
approximately a one year period depending on the extent of the service required by the City
This proposal is valid for 90 days from the date stated above Terms NET 30 We look
forward to continuing on this project Should you have any questions regarding the cost or
contractual aspects of our proposal, please contact the undersigned. For technical matters
contact Mr Steve Martin at 310 563 6616
Sincerely,
Lloyd E Kosanke
Contracts Manager
Enclosures
WYLE RESEARCH
128 Maryland Street, Et Segundo, Cahform 90245 -4100
Telephone (310) 322 -1763
FAX (310) 322 -9799
VJU
Proposal Number: 580.06.048
27- Feb -06
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
Construction Monitoring and Oversight Services
Schedule 1
Total Program Cost
Direct Labor Title (Typical) Hours Rate/Hour($) Amount ($
Job Group 8
Program Mgr
388
16500
64,020
Job Group 7
Senior Engineer
960
12500
120,000
Job Group 6
Engineer
0
9500
0
Job Group 5
Senior Technician
120
75 00
9,000
Job Group 4
Technician
0
50.00
0
LABOR TOTAL
1468
193,020
Material (Cell Phones) 7,080
Subcontractor - None Anticipated 0
TOTAL MAT /SUB 7,080
TOTAL 200,100
MIMI
03
Proposal Number: 580.06.048
27- Feb -06
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
Construction Monitoring and Oversight Services
Schedule 1
Costs/Hours by Task
RFP
Labor Grades*
�$]
Task
Description
8
7 5
Hours
Mat/DBE
Total
I
Management
90
120
210
7,080
30,930
2
Meetings
90
90
0
14,850
3
Material Inspection
32
32
0
5,280
4
Daily Observation
32
360
392
0
50,280
5
RFI/RCO
24
40
64
0
8,960
6
Certified Payroll
24
360
384
0
48,960
7
Final Inspection
96
200
296
0
40,840
Estimated Costs
388
960 120
1,468
$7,080
$200,100
Per Bid Group:
*Labor Grades
8
7
6
5
$50,025
Descriptions
Architect/Project Manager
Senior Engineer
Engineer
Technician
i.s� W
U .s 8
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 21, 2006
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS & BOARDS
AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Consideration and possible action regarding the announcement of the
appointment of one candidate to the Capital Improvement Program Advisory Committee (CIPAC)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
(1) Announce the appointee to the CIPAC, if any. and term of office,
BA46(2) A'ternativel discuss and take other action related to this item
RO D SDI$
Interviews of candidates to be held March 21, 2006 at 6 00 p m , and the appointment of the
successful candidate to be announced, as follows
Committee/Commission & Board # of Openings Apoo�nteels) T rm Exo�re(s)
CIPAC
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. N/A
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
ORIGINATED:
REVIEWED
11/30/07
Date: March 8, 2006
Date: March 2006
031)
3
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE- March 21, 2006
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Reports of Committees,
Boards, and Commissions
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action on the Business Committee's recommendation for a new
City web page to attract new businesses to El Segundo, in coordination with Shannon David,
Inc , consultant for the project (No current fiscal impact Total project of $125,000 previously
approved on March 15, 2005)
COUNCIL ACTION:
Recommendation (1) Receive and file presentation by staff and Shannon David, Inc, (2)
Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION.
On November 15, 2005, a presentation was made to the City Council regarding Phase I of the
new business attraction campaign with the consultant, Shannon David, Inc The design of forty
(40) light pole banners for the Sepulveda Boulevard corridor was reviewed for Installation In
December 2005 The banners have been In place on the median and sidewalk light poles on
Sepulveda Boulevard between Imperial Highway and Rosecrans Avenue for three months
Phase II of the campaign called for development of a new business - oriented web page to
provide current and prospective enterprises in El Segundo with a complete range of interactive
tools This site would allow interested parties to gather information about the City environment,
send inquiries, communicate with City officials, locate local resources, and provide contacts to
assist them Phase III deliverables include outdoor advertising on billboards to be installed at
strategic locations within the Los Angeles metro area, as well as, placement of print ads in
business journals in order to reach more businesses seeking to locate in El Segundo
At this time the committee is bringing forward the recommended web site to Council for a
review and progress report
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Selected web page screen shots from El Segundo Business Beta Site
Operating Budget: $135,000
Amount Requested: None
Account Number: 2401 -6214, 2401 -6201
Protect Phase: Presentation of phase II
Appropriation Required: _Yes x No
ORIGINATED O'Y. DATE. 3/15106
Bill Crowe -Ahi Istant City Manager
REVI7C[ty DATE: 3 jf 06
Jeff Manager
4
u`fU
U4l
ws m mw FowM root
,ws. .w- 0mf2la
ABOUT EL SEGUN00
aw.
L96M14n
I'llm
414 '�,
PIt E* W fN Tank
o-art --r -satile
DOING BUSINESS
mo nut
Tao 10 Eamlwere
F."uae 500 Cweoareas
Ma or Dmca Centers
Ker lnaunries
N I D I m
Jg);= -meth- [I]ooamwt9- evawkw Ik]DaNl.in•Iroawew I _ __ _ _ ___ __
U4'
w M& %W PW; M TO*
4-e.k•i- 0F4AIS
STATISTICS
I)afaMARI YS
QMlW
Dual
C crol Off 5
Coma andpok safes
T,mlfffansowiaf on
122M
a1r_ �DopaMn9•wppRW �F�ooan.rs+-nw«atw 1®a,a.was.rm, tw, 1 -wca.dew,I � 1►l�q
044
"a Ed Nm Toasts Tats Hip
iabstlr • Y - 0 [A G1 I @slam
km
COMMERCIAL OFFICE SPACE
Arxrabe AskmO Relrts by Submarks/ em Ouaner a2005, Class A BullBlnOs
mmwwf�! mom
Eles.wm- IbetleT_ goxes.s- waawrtw IT.eta�ortw J
fJ 4 J
046
°k lItisa
J Q9ssPsdwo —;nihe O uy®_ __
_�_tl tw
047
w 9ft
Ad*W ncce llsia�usr c.Jbet Pj =..d
upa "
CONNECT
CMAtlaress
cmwww
„tit sfrml'*
FAX
t ev menayr,
I I Nw m l' iry� mw it
I i onunm Omminyrornl
❑u iu, ♦luu
PI nmm9 h lfiudd SnbN
AN tmpl.In,
Lm¢4�InMorm Nino n 1
Enewsletle�
Enewsletter
Dsw
� —w
°k lItisa
J Q9ssPsdwo —;nihe O uy®_ __
_�_tl tw
047
Z
O u
Z�
m
W
m H
W
Ott
U�
3
M
W�
N
2
O
N �
n W W
f
Y LL
yO O m
a w W W
K m2 K d
O O F
Q ? 0
J O O O
> > > >
°a
a w w w
O U U V
�+ a
ci ci m N riom N�mi 'oi o `m m �
n U E g O1
yy U
i LL E
° 3U3 W m N NN F
F �O LL u a Ow a� of �mNbu
a rz z z E z z° 1 z u
6LL5W w rccWi °z °z�+ a m oAVnf
° 4 LL O r r'=u J z ~ i u U W LL J¢ F
tLL rc rc o 2 m F m r W w? °z � u c3W3i rcKJ y m m S 2 E tl o s m
i ru p m 3N3 3g3
8 iiw zz iZ'w�FF ou �� m W w m a v m f FS
1-H F J Z U~ LL W 1� NFQ J2�l9 W N Q m O E �� FO,
3 Q 4f41 J W J ZZ pp W
KLLW (5 FOFOa� J'" ¢ K� d
U' Y�-NQa U6LLa Z2SO Z1WYUa V � tai��j U' WJli d' W W O � 9 � � � L Y.�O 6N St
v � N04
n _ b oo pOO_C _ U ry a
OO- -N-�- --� ---^ S��aN �� �O��s Fn�
LLp_U m u ci a uew3 i s
a 5 g LL
U LL 8 O
OU
LL U N 5 m K
u a m S p
0 48
�O
W
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER
2124/2006 THROUGH 3/0912006
Date
Payee
Amount
Description
2/28/06
Federal Reserve
475 DO
Employee I Bonds
2/28106
Federal Reserve
50 DO
Employee EE Bonds
2128/06
Health Comp
4,07690
Weekly claims 2121
311106
Cal PERS
260,743 47
PERS Retirement
3/1/06
Lane Donovan Golf Ptrs
18,290 72
Golf Course payroll transfer
3/2/06
Unumprovident
55950
LTC Insurance - Mar
3/2/06
Health Comp
3,34061
Weekly claims 2/24
316/06
Cal PERS
323,086 01
PERS Health
3/9106
Health Comp
1,95591
Weekly claims 313
2110- 2/23/06
Workers Comp Activity
43,408 16
SCRMA checks issued
655, 986 28
DATE OF RATIFICATION: 3121106
TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE:
Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by
655,986.28
2 'l 'h LaQ, 3 110/0(,
Depu Treasofer A Date
3-/x-0
Date
3
Date(
he City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 7, 2006 - 5:00 P M
5 00 P M SESSION
CALL TO ORDER — Mayor McDowell at 5 00 p m
ROLL CALL
Mayor McDowell -
Present
Mayor Pro Tern Gaines -
Absent
Council Member Boulgandes -
Present
Council Member Busch -
Present
Council Member Jacobson -
Present
Mark Hensley, City Attorney, announced that Council would be meeting in closed session pursuant
to items identified on the agenda and that 54956 9(b) items were threats of litigation regarding the
LAX RSI Program and Fransen relating to 916 Sheldon Street
Mayor McDowell requested if there were no objections from other Council members that John
Gaines be excused from the meeting tonight for medical reasons No objections noted
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act
(Government Code Section §54960, et seq ) for the purposes of confemng with the City's Real
Property Negotiator, and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation,
and /or discussing matters covered under Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel), and /or
conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators, as follows
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956 9(a)) — 3
matters
Pulido v City of El Segundo, USDC No 03CV7563
City of El Segundo v 2221 Park Place, LASC Case No BC319034
City of El Segundo v CTF2, Alaska, LASC Case No BC319033
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956 9(b) -4- potential cases
(no further public statement is required at this time), Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government
Code §54956 9(c) -0- matter
DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) — 0 matter
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54957.6) -0- matter
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 7, 2006
PAGE NO t
U50
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956 8) -1- matter
Purchase of Real Property (Parcel Nos 4138- 004 -016 (primary parcel), 4138 - 004 -008 and 4138-
004 -015)
City Negotiator Jeff Stewart, City Manager
Property Owner Federal Express Corporation/Thomas Properties
SPECIAL MATTERS — 0 matter
Council recessed at 6 55 p.m
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 7, 2006
PAGE NO 2
051
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 7, 2006 - 7.00 P.M.
7 00 P M SESSION
CALL TO ORDER — Mayor McDowell at 7 05 p m
INVOCATION — Pastor Roger Kinsey of Pacific Baptist Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Councilmember Eric Busch
PRESENTATIONS —
(a) Council Member Busch presented a Proclamation to the Tree Muskateers recognizing the
important roles played by trees and the young people of our community in improving our
hometown quality of life, proclaiming March 11, 2006 as California Arbor Day and inviting
the community to plant "Trees to the Sea" in the Imperial Highway median strip from 9 00
a m to noon on March 11, 2006
(b) Council Member Busch also announced the presentation by Roy Craft (NRG) EI Segundo
Power $10,000 to the Tree Muskateers for the purchase and maintenance of the new trees
(c) El Segundo Rotary Club President Alex Sanchez presented a $5,000 donation to the City
of El Segundo for sponsorship of the 2006 Annual Concerts in the Park series
ROLL CALL
Mayor McDowell -
Present
Mayor Pro Tem Gaines -
Absent
Council Member Boulgandes -
Present
Council Member Busch -
Present
Council Member Jacobson -
Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City
Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify
themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of $250 While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow
Council to take action on any item not on the agenda The Council will respond to comments after
Public Communications is closed
Peggy Tyrell, resident, spoke regarding the internet sites listed by Mayor McDowell in the El
Segundo Herald She also stated that she felt the Council deserves a raise, but the amount
proposed is excessive She felt compensation of $600 would be sufficient
Juli Potter, resident, spoke on the Council compensation Ordinance and she felt it was excessive
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 7, 2006
PAGE NO 3
052
Liz Garnholz, resident, also spoke regarding Council compensation and she felt it was excessive
Gail Church, resident, spoke on the Council compensation ordinance and expressed her support
A PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda by title only
MOTION by Council Member Jacobson, SECONDED by Council Member Boulgandes to read all
ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda by title only MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS
VOICE VOTE 4/0 COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES ABSENT
B SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS
C UNFINISHED BUSINESS
D REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Consideration and possible action regarding the setting of a date and time for interviewing
candidates to the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee ( CIPAC)
MOTION by Council Member Boulgandes, SECONDED by Council Member Busch to set date for
Interviews of candidates to the CIPAC at 6:00 p m , Tuesday, March 21, 2006, to be continued to
6 00 p m, Tuesday, April 4, 2006 MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE 410
COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES ABSENT
E CONSENT AGENDA
All Items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously If a
call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next
heading of business
2 Approved Warrant Numbers 2552032 to 2552266 on Register No 10 in the total amount of
$647,015 85 and Wire Transfers from 2/10/2006 through 2/23/2006 in the total amount of
$1,320,922 71 Authorized staff to release Ratified: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks,
checks released early due to contracts or agreement, emergency disbursements and /or
adjustments, and wire transfers
3 Approved City Council Meeting Minutes of February 21, 2006
4 PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCIL MEMBER JACOBSON.
5 Approved Professional Services Agreement No 3575 with Prosum, Inc to provide
Information technology consulting and support services including a turnkey solution for both
Active Directory migration and the setup of a new Exchange email server and other
regularly scheduled services. (Fiscal Impact $55,700) Authorized the City Manager to
execute the Agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 7, 2006
PAGE NO 4
053
Approved the amended Senior Building Inspector fob classification by the Planning and
Building Safety Department (PBS) (Fiscal Impact $700) Adopted Resolution No 4458
establishing the new monthly salary range
7 PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCIL MEMBER BUSCH,
8 PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCIL MEMBER BUSCH
9 Approved amendment to existing Agreement No 3464 with CALTROP Corporation to
perform construction Inspection of public infrastructure to be constructed in conjunction with
the Plaza El Segundo Development (Fiscal Impact $60,000 amendment to be funded by
developer, new contract amount = $1,825,475) Authorized the City Manager to execute.
10 Accepted a $5,000 donation from El Segundo Rotary for sponsorship of the 2006 Annual
Concerts in the Park series and apply to the Recreation and Parks Department's Concert in
the Park Trust Fund
MOTION by Council Member Busch, SECONDED by Council Member Boulgarides to approve
Consent Agenda Items 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 10 MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE
4/0 COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES ABSENT
CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA
4 Consideration and possible action regarding adoption of Ordinance No 1392 amending El
Segundo Municipal Code § 1 -4 -3, City Council compensation, to increase the City Council's
compensation to $900 per month (Fiscal Impact $25,020 annually)
MOVED by Council Member Boulgarides, SECONDED by Council Member Busch too adopt
Ordinance No 1392 amending El Segundo Municipal Code § 1 -4 -3, City Council compensation, to
increase the City Council's compensation to $900 per month (Fiscal Impact $25,020 annually)
MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOICE VOTE 3/1/1 AYES MCDOWELL, BUSCH
AND BOULGARIDES; NOES JACOBSON; ABSENT: GAINES
Council Member Busch requested his salary not be Increased during his current term
7 Consideration and possible action regarding award of contract to Tangram Interiors for
office furniture for six workstations in support of the Residential Sound Insulation Program
(Fiscal Impact = $24, 450 54)
MOVED by Council Member Busch, SECONDED by Council Member Jacobson to waive the
formal bidding process per the Municipal Code and approved the City's use of U S Communities,
Fairfax County, VA, competitively solicited Master Agreement #RQ01- 411313 -16, for office
furniture with Steelcase (manufacturer) and awarded Contract No 3576 to Tangram Interiors for
office furniture for six workstations in support of the Residential Sound Insulation Program (Fiscal
Impact $24,45054) MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE 4/0 MAYOR PROTEM
GAINES ABSENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 7, 2006
PAGE NO 5
U��
8 Consideration and possible action regarding the purchase of a new shuttle bus from
Creative Bus Sales, Inc at a cost of $64,500 and approval to retire and surplus one used
shuttle bus (Fiscal Impact $64,500 — AB 2766 Funds)
MOVED by Council Member Busch, SECONDED by Council Member Boulgandes to authorize
the purchase of a new alternative fuel shuttle bus from Creative Bus Sales, Inc at a cost of
$64,500 (AB 2766 Funds) under the existing State paratransit bus purchase contract and
authorized staff to surplus and sell one used shuttle bus at auction MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE 4/0 MAYOR PRO TEM GAINES ABSENT
F NEW BUSINESS
G REPORTS — CITY MANAGER — NONE
H REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY — NONE
REPORTS — CITY CLERK — NONE
REPORTS — CITY TREASURER — NONE
K REPORTS — CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member Boulgandes —
11 Consideration and possible action to Increase the compensation of the positions of City
Treasurer and City Clerk to $1,300 /month and Increase the compensation of the members
of the Planning Commission and the members of the Recreation and Parks Commission to
$50 00 per meeting (Fiscal Impact $7,100 for FY 2005/2006, $14,200 annually)
MOTION by Council Member Boulgandes, SECONDED by Council Member Busch to adopt
Resolution No 4460 Increasing the compensation for the positions of City Treasurer and City Clerk
to $1,300 /month as amended to read In Section 1A1 020 (A) and (B) (estimated to take 20 hours
per week to complete) and the members of the Planning and Recreation and Parks Commissions
to $50 00 per meeting MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE 4/0 COUNCIL
MEMBER GAINES ABSENT
Council Member Busch —Spoke regarding Plate Scan Technology Requested a report from the
Police Department on this new technology
Council Member Jacobson — Reported on the Sanitation District tour he attended on composting
and recycling
Mayor McDowell — Reported on the Sister City trip to Guyamas
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 7, 2006
PAGE NO 6
U55
12 Consideration and possible action regarding the City's position on AB 2015 (Lieu), a bill
which expands municipal representation on the Southern California Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) Board of Directors
MOTION by Mayor McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Busch to authorize the Mayor to
execute and forward Resolution No 4459 supporting AB 2015 (Lieu) which enhances municipal
representation on the SCAQMD Board of Directors MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE
VOTE 4/0 MAYOR PRO TEM GAINES ABSENT.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have receive value of $50 or more to communicate to the City
Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify
themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of $250 While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow
Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after
Public Communications is closed
Liz Garnholz, resident, requested Council to reply to questions she submitted during the earlier
communications on Council compensation Requested information on the Thomas Properties bid
Juli Potter, resident, spoke regarding the building of two story structures. She read a letter into the
record regarding contractors being allowed to build seven days a week Requested a written
response
MEMORIALS — NONE
CLOSED SESSION - NONE
ADJOURNMENT AT 8 05 P M
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 7, 2006
PAGE NO 7
JO )
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE. March 21, 2006
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
Consideration and possible action to retain URS Corporation to perform testing and analysis of
soil and gas beneath proposed athletic field and fire station sites located along the north side
of Mariposa Avenue between Nash and Douglas Streets (827 N Douglas Street) to update
potential pollution risk assessments (Fiscal Impact- $36,150)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Authorize the City Manager to sign a professional services agreement approved as to form
by the City Attorney, 2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION.
The City of El Segundo plans on developing a soccer field and building a fire station on
property formerly used for aircraft manufacturing Industrial chemicals were detected through
phase I environmental assessments and identifies trichloroethylene among the chemicals
detected beneath the site In 1997, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los
Angeles Region, issued a "No Further Action" letter for groundwater and indicated no
objections to any development commencing at the site However, because risk assessment
data was collected more than 10 years ago and uses data that is no longer considered to be
the industry standard, new soil and gas data are recommended to re- validate risk assessment
information to allow for the safe development of athletic fields and construction of a fire station
on Mariposa Avenue, east of Nash Street
(Continued on next page marked 'Background and Discussion"
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
March 10, 2006 URS Proposal for Limited Soil and Soil Gas Investigation, 827 North Douglas
Street
FISCAL IMPACT $36,150
Capital Budget,
$5,500,000
Amount Requested,
$36,150.00
Account Number-
302 -400- 8202.8999
Project Phase
Appropriation Required
X Yes _No
ORI INATED BY. DATE. March 15, 2006
e( ,
Steve Tsumura, nvironmental Safety Manager
City Manager
0 5' 7
7
Background and Discussion (con't):
Soil gas and soil samples will be collected using quality control /quality assurance mechanisms,
and will be assessed using approved Department of Toxic Substances Control "Preliminary
Endangerment Assessment" or PEA guidelines A risk assessment for residential application
will be used for the Fire Station, and a modified risk assessment for a children's soccer field
will be incorporated.
The recommended testing represents a portion of the City's "due diligence" to ensure the
purchase of an environmentally sound parcel, as provided for in the development agreement
and purchase and sale agreement with Thomas Properties Group
05- 8
March 10, 2006
Mr. Steve Tsumura
Environmental Safety Manager
City of El Segundo - Fire Department
314 Main Street
El Segundo, California 90245
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR LIMITED SOIL AND SOIL GAS INVESTIGATION
827 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA
Dear Mr Tsumura
Per your request, URS Corporation (URS) is pleased to submit this proposal to conduct a limited sod
dnd soil gas investigation at the subject area proposed for redevelopment at 827 North Douglas Street
in the City of El Segundo Per information provided by the City of El Segundo, the area to be
redeveloped into a soccer field and fire station consists of approximately 6 4 acres, which located in
the southwestern portion of the greater site area The greater site area consists of approximately 46
acres and is bounded by Nash Street (to the west), North Douglas Street (to the east), Mariposa Street
(to the south) and Atwood Way (to the north)
The purpose of this investigation is to further evaluate current subsurface conditions in the area of the
proposed soccer field and fire station and evaluate the potential human health risk based on the
proposed land use at the site (i a fire station and soccer field) It is our understanding that time is of
the essence in completing this work since the purchase of the property is currently in escrow and
pending the results of this site investigation
SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 1 — Pre -Field Activities
Prior to field activities, URS will conduct the following pre -field activities
• Coordinate field logistics (staff, equipment, and subcontractors)
• Prepare a site- specific health and safety plan to address hazards associated with the soil and
soil gas investigation
• Prepare a quality assurance protect plan to ensure the reliability and comparability of all
data generated during the limited investigation
• Mark and clear each boring and sod gas location prior to field activities A geophysical
survey will be used to clear each proposed location
URS Corporation
915 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700
Los Angeles CA 90017 -3437
Tel 213 994 2200
Fax 213 996 2458
w urscorp com
Mr. Steve Tsumura
Proposal for Site Review/Evaluation
827 North Douglas Street
March 10, 2006
Page 2
• Contact underground service alert (USA) 48 -hours in advance of field activities to allow the
appropriate agencies and companies to mark the locations of their underground utilities
TASK 2 — Field Investigation
The field investigation will consist of a sod gas and soil investigation to further evaluate subsurface
conditions in the area of the proposed soccer field and fire station The soil gas investigation will
consist of installing six soil vapor probes and advancing six soil borings The details of each
component of the field investigation are provided below
Soil Gas Invests ag_tion
URS will advance six soil vapor probes (SG -1 through SG -6) at the site using a direct push drill rig
Four soil gas probes will be installed in the vicinity of the proposed soccer field Focal areas
include the north central portion of Former Building 131, the east and west ends of Former
Building 133, and the western end of Former Building 135 The other two soil gas probes will
be advanced in the footprint of the proposed fire station The proposed locations of the soil gas
probes are presented on Figure 1 (attached) The rational for placement of each soil vapor probe
is presented in Table 1 (attached)
A hydraulic hammer will be used to advance a core barrel equipped with a post run tubing (PRT)
sampling tip capped with a detachable anchor point Upon reaching the desired sample depth, the
probes will be pulled up approximately six inches allowing the anchor point to detach,
Thereafter, flexible tubing will be advanced down the core barrel and screwed into the PRT
sampling tip using an "O -ring" sealed tube adapter The core barrel will be removed from the
boring, leaving the anchor point and implant at the bottom of the boring
A soil vapor sample will be withdrawn from the probe tubing using an oil -less vacuum pump and
immediately transferred to the mobile lab for injection into a gas chromatograph/mass
spectrometer for analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260B, which is consistent with the
DTSC /LARWQCB Advisory
Soil gas samples will be collected at 5 and 15 feet bgs For the purposes of cost estimating, a
total of 16 soil gas samples (12 primary, two purge volume samples and two duplicates) are
budgeted for analysis One duplicate sample will be collected for every 10 samples, or 10% of
the total sample number In addition, duplicate samples will be collected in Summa canisters
and analyzed for VOCs using US EPA Method TO -15
Soil Investigation
URS will advance six soil borings (SB -1 through SB -6) using a Geoprobe 5400 direct push drill
rig Four soil borings will be installed in the vicinity of the proposed soccer field
G 'RemedQ9402104 Crti of rl f El Segundo P.po l_011006 doe
U
Mr Steve
Proposal Tsu
for tc ,,
Pa ch 10 2OO glasStre t valuation
age 3 6 t<e
Focal areas u ��nclude the no he born advanc 133 and pie central Aortio
Wes n a
Acs need in T senkci n f °tPrint Of the end o fF�rn°rtner �uildi o
Ciar'ng drilling ble I �attac lgnre I iatt proposed firer Build rn nb 131, the
retr hed ache e s . g 135, east
actable operations, ) d) The rat tahon The The other and Wet e
sat pler Will Piston a h Tonal Pro tw end
n
Therslaer eta e s e� upon d intochl gd the 1deslrmmCr will for Piacem�nt o fea h ons Soil o fill �bs
to mpie evllecntainr g th�24,inc tli$ rsp t° c° Cat satnP]e be tiled t° ad sail boring is
gSm co iron, n Sot! he c Ile the sa depth, the a ante
g I} wt11 length) as mpie, gist a c
and 21 Purposes a piing drdG then be re the core b Sol] will on wrU be ore barrel
u h p1 9-, se/.- 6.24 and 26ing'i�ersalsitte o °nlifu rn the samadvan ed h� en into a °Iknd a d tthe
teOSvcred back into ap$ t ftsect, ewb�ti to mac feet bps re soil Dame/ for lgggith ofthe seuynside end reared ontil the det e e eu
bgri deCOntamrnatlotandth deAhgfe$cfeetbglelq ill he Coll eosesand
bq mum
During 1 °cation, each 'red bori11j, deAddttignal section and addends covered Wh hOrmg will d 16 feet b ed for
boring nucl d acttvltias, rehole W111 be bas reache s of od new slee e the °n Mshcet Pproximdte� 9
depth; htholber and I " e followin ckfilled H,ithPon cc, )Ictere added a Sample ha and Capped ad th
an�Caa�e) ln�uh�ecription'ronlhfig Method trop will beet tOnite chips to drilling ac viproc ssl!/ be
oiseglorah n Un'sture totem , Particle/ accordance le jdentlficatc to dOC mede surface es at each s°bl
rebealth and nsua odors, nt descrl size and With the p on numbe nt the site "
oii the b r�°g ogsitorir'g s �d pP/d readin�Y t siblelo yldnc or dius n the ficat�n in, IgatiOn.
Sestsample
Sall Cuthn
sampling gsc
and deCOntamin screen "ng duhPngtol l iza4pn r SSol] Cont, nl( loll co/orf
Fria
Wfil n
U O to 1° water be d r s�Pling Ply sac w ll be ale,
0 Soil
.1amplestselectedsamPles Per boring disposal. will stare n dings Will be
SS,
will vary 9 1nbserved and s °bmntedr ag w111 be cone gallgn drutns Pe n
nd;
Soil Sal r]
each boring and Plb reaciln lea/ anclted and sub g waste Profile
nstituent Collette gs% Ther YSIS will b mitred for chern
Total peboleun7 xlYdrtl1e Feld for thermal anal the depths at Which samp bservat lsis ohe
°carb Ysis wit are co i l]
ors C arbor Chain Analysis i7pf be anal yZed f the foil itted
qr
IIo n
°e) bYEPA f �
�IethOd Sd 1 SM
4 ,rQe�d'- 90GSip,1 CuY of EJ 5e p
5 �ndo,AnPo n ➢Crtv ofEl
"�^`�il G3r0G5 tloc
Mr Steve Tsumura
Proposal for Site Review /Evaluation
827 North Douglas Street
March 10, 2006
Page 4
• Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B/5035
• Title 22 (CAM 17) Metals by EPA Method 6010B/7470A
• Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) by EPA Method 8310 (for samples containing
TPH greater than 100 mg /kg)
• Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by EPA Method 8082 (for samples containing TPH
greater than 100 mg/kg)
For the purposes of cost estimating, up to 14 soil samples (12 primary and two (2) duplicates) and
two (2) water samples (one (1) trip blank and one (1) field blank) are budgeted for analyses The trip
blank and field blank samples will be submitted to evaluate quality assurance and quality control
procedures However, the exact number of samples will be based on the results of the field activities
All samples will be analyzed on a 5 -day turn around time basis One duplicate sample will be
collected for every 10 samples, or 10% of the total sample number
This proposal does not include a groundwater investigation During 1995, the Los Angeles
Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a case closure letter for the site.
TASK 3 — Reporting
Following completion of the field activities, URS will provide a letter report to the City of El
Segundo documenting results of the field investigation The report will include the following
information
• Site map, boring logs, certified laboratory data, waste disposal manifests
• Summaries of field observations, sampling procedures, and analytical results
• Human health screening evaluation to be conducted in accordance with the DTSC's PEA
Guidance Manual (January 1994, Second Printing, June 1999)
• Conclusion and recommendations for the proposed redevelopment area based on
proposed land use
SCHEDULE AND COST
Site activities can commence immediately upon authorization of this proposal Within two weeks
following completion of the field activities, the letter report summarizing the results of the
C MR ,medd9,102304 Cth of EI S,gundo,Pmposn110ry of El Seggmdo P,,.,,1_031006 d.c
i� 6�
Mr Steve Tsumura
Proposal for Site Review /Evaluation
827 North Douglas Street
March 10, 2006
Page 5
investigation will be prepared and submitted to the City of El Segundo Verbal communication will
be provided during the investigation
The total estimated cost to complete these activities is $36,117 A detailed summary of the estimated
costs is presented in Table 2 This cost estimate assumes the following
• The field investigation will take no more that two full working days
• URS field staff have unlimited access to the area proposed for redevelopment
• Soil samples will be analyzed on a 5 -day turn around time basis
• Up to 14 soil samples are submitted for chemical analyses as presented in Task 2
• One field blank water samples are submitted for chemical analysis as presented in Task 2
• One trip blank water sample is submitted for chemical analysis as presented in Task 2
• Up to 16 soil gas samples are submitted for chemical analyses as presented in Task 2
CLOSING
URS appreciates the opportunity to provide environmental consulting services to the City of El
Segundo If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to call either of
the undersigned at (213) 996 -2200
Sincerely,
URS CORPORATION
Al AMh ou P E Brian Saco C HG
Principal Engineer Principal Scterttist Vi President
Attachment— Figure 1 — Site Plan
Table 1 — Sample Rational Table
Table 2 — Cost Summary
G �'Remedi29402304 Cm of El SegundoToopo a]'Cr, of El Segmido Propmal_031006 doc
063
BE
234
91
192
132 151
-----------------------
;- - --' --'
-------------------'-
------- -------- - -- -'
0 200
APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
1lSB -1
'SG-
SG- 2 /SB -2
D
BDUINMY
PROPOSED
o
FIRE STATION
BUW.. INOT TOSWLEI
MPROX EX4gVAT10N BOUNDARY
"3 0181771
D
PROPOSED
SOCCER FIELD ( 93
133
�0� ;B733 -4 (20(
a9so19
a93a18 SG- 6/SB -6 a
131
a 3 -030(
#9932 a
{[Jj 03 -021
NASH STREET
SITE PLAN
827 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA
9
(78;
DULEY ROAD
R
9UBIELTpgOPER}V
BDUINMY
132
APPROX LOCATIONS OF FORMER
-- - - - - -�
BUW.. INOT TOSWLEI
MPROX EX4gVAT10N BOUNDARY
"3 0181771
APPROX FORMER UST LOWTION
SG SI$B 5#
PROPOSED 9.FO* LoC'.
8131 7(93)0
PREVIOUS BORING LOCATIONWI TOE
COMC IN$OIL Iu;M W 5585 FT BDS
_il I
664
TABLE 1
Sample Rational Table (Soil and Sod Gas)
City of El Segundo
827 North Douglas Street
El Segundo, California
Soil Gas Locations
SAMPLING
SAMPLE DEPTH
SOIL GAS LOCATION RATIONALE
LOCATION
(ft -bgs)
SG -1
5
Assess the potential impacts below the proposed fire station
15
structure near former UST (93 -041)
SG-2
5
Assess potential impacts below the center of the proposed fire
15
station structure
SG -3
5
Assess the potential impacts from former USTs (93 -047 and 89-
15
410) TOE was detected at 2,000 uglkg between 55 to 60 feet
SB -2
TBD
bgs sod from an adjacent exploratory born
SG-4
5
Assess the potential impacts from former USTs (93 -020, 89 -022,
15
and 89 -023) TCE was detected at 260 ug /kg at the base of the
excavation in post remediation confirmation samples collected in
SB -3
TBD
this area
SG -5
5
Assess sod vapor conditions at the edge of excavation where
15
TCE was detected at 93 uglkg between 55 to 60 feet bgs in soil
SB -4
TBD
collected from an adjacent ex loratory boring
SG -6
5
Assess sod vapor conditions in non- remediated areas and in the
15
wcm(ty of former UST 93 -018
Soil Boring Locations
SAMPLING
SAMPLE DEPTH
SOIL BORING LOCATION RATIONALE
LOCATION
(ft -bgs)
SB -1
TBD
Assess the potential impacts below the fire station near former
UST (93 -041) There is no historical sod data for the area
proposed for development as the fire station Therefore, this
soil boring will serve as a verification boring to evaluate the
presence of contamination potentially originating from former
UST 93 -041
SB -2
TBD
Assess the potential impacts below the fire station near former
UST (93 -041) There is no historical soil data for the area
proposed for development as the fire station Therefore, this
sod boring will serve as a verification born
SB -3
TBD
Assess the potential impacts from former USTs (93-047 and 89-
410) Post remediation confirmation samples indicated the
presence of TCE at 55 to 60 feet bgs in this area
SB -4
TBD
Assess the conditions of the backfill material
SB -5
TBD
Assess soil conditions at the edge of excavation where TCE was
detected at 93 uglkg between 55 to 60 feet bgs in soil collected
from an ad acent exploratory boring
SB -6
TBD
Assess sod conditions to non- remediated areas and in the
vic nity of former UST 93 -018
VVJ
TABLE 2
COST SUMMARY • SITE INVESTIGATION
827 North Douglass Street
El Segundo, California
March 10, 2006
URS LABOR COSTS
TASK 1
TASK 2
TASK 3
Pre -Field Activities
Field Investigation
Reporting
TOTAL
TOTAL
STAFF CATEGORY RATE
untts/Hrs Cost
UnitsMrs Cost
Units /lire Cost
UNITSIHRS
COST
Project Principal Engineer /Scientist/Manager
$16500
20 $330
20 $330
40 $660
80
$1,320
Senior Project Engineer /Scientist
$13500
100 $1,350
60 $810
120 $1,620
280
$3,780
Project Engineer /Scientist
$12000
40 $480
200 $2,400
350 $4,200
590
$7,080
Assistant Project Engineer /Scientist
$10000
00 $0
Go $0
40 $400
40
$400
Senior Staff Engineer /Scientist
$8500
200 $1,700
200 $1,700
200 $1,700
600
$5,100
Staff Engmeer/Scienbst
$7500
00 $0
00 $0
00 $0
00
$0
Technician
$68 00
00 $0
00 $0
00 $0
00
$0
Drafter/Illustrator/Technical Editor
$6500
40 $260
00 $0
40 $260
80
$520
Clerical/Word Processor
1 $6000
40 $240
1 00 $0
2 0 $120
60
$360
URS Labor Cost Subtotals
4401 $4,360
1 4801 $5,240
81 0
$8,960
173
$18,560
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
-
ITEM
RATE
Vehicles - Personal
$0360
00 $0
00 $0
00 $0
$0
Vehicles -per day
$6500
1 0 $65
20 $130
00 $0
$195
Haz -Waste Kit (per day)
$3000
00 $0
20 $60
00 $0
$60
Dust Monitor (per day)
$12000
00 $0
00 $0
00 $0
$0
XRF Instrumentation +Supplies /day
$30000
00 $0
00 $0
00 $0
$0
Organic Vapor Analyzer, per day
$12000
00 $0
20 $240
00 $0
$240
Electric Rolorhammer Soil Sampler /day
$25000
00 $0
00 $0
00 $0
$0
Misc ODCs (All inclusive)
00 $131
00 $262
00 $448
$841
Communications
3% of Labor
$131
$157
$269
$557
Reimbursable Expenses Cost Subtotal
§327
$849
$717
$1,893
SUBCONTRACTOR COSTS
SUBCONTRACTOR
RATE
FIELD WORK
Soil Gas Survey - Geoprobe & Mobile Lab /Day
$3,500
00 $0
10 $3,500
00 $0
$3,500
Geoprobe /Drilling Sod sampling /Day
$1,550
00 $0
10 $1,550
00 $0
$1,550
Geophysical Survey
$1,400
05 $700
0 0 $0
00 $0
$700
VOC by TO -15 Analysis - 5 day TAT
$20000
00 $0
20 $400
00 $0
$400
6 -liter Summa Canisters
$3500
00 $0
20 $70
00 $0
$70
Title 22 Metals by 601OB17470A - 5 day TAT
$9500
00 $0
140 $1,330
00 $0
$1,330
PCBs by 8082- 5 day TAT
$7500
00 $0
140 $1,050
00 $0
$1,050
PAHs by 8310 -5day TAT
$16000
00 $0
140 $2240
00 $0
$2,240
VOCs EPA 82608/5035 - 5 day TAT
$9000
00 $0
140 $1,260
00 $0
$1,260
VOC EnCore prep and supplies
$3000
00 $0
140 $420
00 $0
$420
TPH -cc (C7 -C36) EPA 8015M- 5 day TAT
$5500
00 $0
140 $770
00 $0
§770
Title 22 Metals by 6 01 0 8174 7 0A - 5 day TAT
$9500
00 $0
20 $190
00 $0
$190
PCBs by 8082- 5 day TAT
$7500
00 $0
20 $150
00 $0
$150
PAHs by 8310 -5day TAT
$16000
00 $0
20 $320
$0
$320
VOCs EPA 8260B/5035 - 5 day TAT
$9000
00 $0
20 $180
00 $0
$180
PH-cc (C7 -C36) EPA 8015M- 5 day TAT
$5500
00 $0
20 $110
00 $0
$110
URS Subcontractor mark -Up 10% 1
$0 11
00 $70 1
00 $1,354
1 00 $0
$1,424
SUBCONTRACTOR COST SUBTOTALS
$770
$14,894
$0
§15,664
TASK SUBTOTALS
$5,457
$20,983
$9,677
$36,117
TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATED COST
$36,117
T 11999,57 099700 42 LAUSD,ADMINWrowsals \Gen LA MS s4slQly of EL Segundo Cost E5t_031006 xis PunWele. Date 311012006
0 tlG
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 21, 2006
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding the award of a contract to Belalre -West
Landscape, Inc for the re- grading and renovation of the Driving Range at the Lakes Golf
Course (Fiscal Impact $368,760)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION-
Recommendation (1) Award the contract to Belalre - West Landscape, Inc, (2) Authorize
the City Manager to execute a public works contract with Belalre —West for $368,760 (3)
Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION-
This project is a result of the City Councils appointed Golf Sub- committee's recommendation
to use funds from the refinancing of the golf course bonds to purchase capital items and
perform capital improvement projects that are needed at the Golf Course
Continued.....
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Bid Responses
FISCAL IMPACT $368,760
Capital Improvement Program- $ 568,200 00
Operating Budget
Account Number: 501 - 400 - 5301 -8104
Project Phase, Award Contract
Appropriation Required. Yes (Proceeds from the Golf Course Bond Refinancing)
ORIGINATED: '�T&j tttt'- ------ DATE: -3 _ ` '3
W
('67
Background and Discussion (con't):
With Council's approval at the February 7, 2006 City Council meeting, staff prepared Contract
Documents and Specifications and went to bid for Project No PW 06 -03 Golf Course
Improvements
The scope of work includes removing all old artificial turf and regrading driving range Install
new irrigation system and replacing artificial turf with natural turf Natural turf to be sod, so that
the down time on the driving range will be shorter Entire project should be completed in 45
working days.
On February 28, 2006, two contractors provided bid responses for the project, Belaire -West
Landscape Inc , project cost $368,760 and Eagle Golf Construction, project cost, $391,130
Staff recommends awarding the contract to Belaire - West Landscape Inc The evaluation
criteria used to select the contractor included, (1) Quality & Completeness of Bid, (2)
Corporate Capability, (3) interviews with General Manager, Superintendent and Job Foreman,
(4) Belaire - West provided the lowest bid
068
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
BID LOG
BID NO. #PW 06.03
City of El Segundo
Refurbishment of the Driving Range at the Lakes Golf Course at El Segundo
Date of BID Opening Tuesday, February 28, 2006
Time of RFP Opening- 11:00 A M. I
Place of RFP Ooemna Citv Clerk's Office L
COMPANY NAMEIADDRESS
BID
Oft finals
1 Belaire -West e, Landsca p Inc
PO Box 6270
Buena Park, Ca 90622 -6270
°O
$ 3b8, t, a
/
Ps
2 Eagle Golf Construction, Inc
PO Box 747
Yorba Linda, Ca 92885 -0747
? 4 i 1,30 e
J ,
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Staff Present
FORMS \B[MOPENLOGI
City Clerk's Office
City Clerk's Office
Public Works, Representative
Parks, Representative
069
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE. March 21, 2006
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION
Consideration and possible action to award a Public Works Contract to Trueline for the surface
refurbishment of seven (7) tennis courts and a basketball court at Recreation Park (339
Sheldon Street) in the amount of $31,960 Approved Capital Improvement Project - Project
No PW 06 -02 - (Fiscal Impact = $36,754 contract and contingency)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Manager to execute a public works contract with
Trueline in the amount of $31,960 to refurbish tennis and basketball courts at Recreation Park,
and (2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
(Background and discussion continued on the next page
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS.
None
FISCAL IMPACT-
Operating Budget
Capital Improvement Program,
Amount Requested
Account Number
Project Phase
Appropriation Required*
$40,000
$36,754 (Contract plus 15% contingency)
301- 400 - 8202 -8644
Award of Contract
No
ORIGINATED BY DATE March 7, 2006
St ven Fenton, Director of Public Works
DATE. 3/1�,
06 -03 -21 Rec Park Courts
r
070
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: (continued)
On February 7, 2006, the City Council adopted the plans and specifications and authorized
staff to advertise the protect for competitive bids
On March 7, 2006, the City Clerk received and opened one bid from Trueline in the amount of
$31,960
Trueline has performed similar protects for the cities of Laguna Beach, Buena Park, Santa
Maria, Escondido and Ridgecrest City of El Segundo received excellent references from other
agencies for protects completed by Trueline
Staff recommends award of a Public Works Contract to Trueline for $31,960 The amount
requested includes the total bid and an additional 15% for potential change orders due to
unforeseen conditions
Uzi
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
MEETING DATE: March 21, 2006
AGENDA HEADING: Consent
Consideration and possible action to approve a Professional Services Agreement with BOA
Architecture in the amount of $31,200 for professional architectural design services for the
remodel of the Human Resources office, the relocation of the City Attorney's office, completion
of the West Conference Room and new seating and carpeting in the City Council Chambers
(Fiscal Impact = $34,320 consultant agreement and contingency)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services
Agreement approved as to form by the City Attorney with BOA Architecture in the amount of
$31,200, and (2) Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION-
The City Hall Remodel Project is a multi- phased effort to modernize and make more effective
use of the existing footprint of City Hall. The first phase was completed in June 2003 and
included improvements to the east and west garden areas (downstairs), the Planning /Building
& Safety /Public Works /Business License counters and lobby area, and the finance offices
Phase 2 of the project was to consist of relocation the Human Resources Division to the West
Conference Room area and the construction of a new West Conference Room in an adjacent
space This effort was deferred while consideration was given to refurbishment of the Council
Chambers
see "Background and Discussion" on
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
BOA Architecture Scope and Fee Proposal
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget:
Capital Improvement Program
Amount Requested:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
NA
$835,200
$34,320 (agreement plus 10% contingency)
301 - 300 - 8201 -8475
Design
No
ORIGIN TED Y: DAT
��y��
C4 is F,n4nn rl,ronfnr of P, d�Lr \Alnr4c
I,T114
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: (continued)
In February 2003, the City solicited requests for proposals for the design of the Council
Chambers and the replacement of City Hall windows Seven proposals were received and
BOA Architecture (BOA) was deemed to be the most qualified. On May 20, 2003, City Council
awarded a consultant agreement to BOA in the amount of $25,900 A subcommittee was
established to review the different concepts developed by BOA, but in the end, the project was
placed on hold and the agreement with BOA expired. BOA's performance under that
agreement was very good
Upon recent reconsideration of the needs at City Hall it is recommended that portions of the
Phase 2 be modified and combined with elements of the Council Chambers refurbishment as
follows
➢ West Conference Room - Leave the West Conference Room in its current location
Remove the partition wall at the south end to enlarge the room and provide
accoutrements to house high -level meetings.
Under the original concept for Phase 2, the West Conference Room was to be
relocated immediately east of its present location into what is now the financial office of
the Administrative Services Department. That concept included removal of a structural
column and costly structural modifications consisting of new beams, columns and
footings. The recommended proposal will provide a larger conference room and will
avoid the extensive structural modifications required under the original concept for
Phase 2
➢ City Attorney's Office - Relocate the City Attorney's office to the room immediately
west of the West Conference Room and provide a door for access from the main
corridor This arrangement will provide a more spacious environment for the attorney in
a location close to the City Manager and Council offices
➢ Human Resources and Employee Lunchroom - Remodel the Human Resources
and Employee Lunchroom areas as follows:
o Remove the corridor to the lunchroom to add square footage to the Human
Resources office.
o Construct a new access to lunchroom from the main comdor
o Reconfigure partition walls in Human Resources to provide a separate office for
the manager and a dedicated conference room for candidate interviews from
space vacated by the City Attorney
This arrangement will provide more space for Human Resources operations which is
currently housed in cramped quarters The proposal will also provide a dedicated
interview facility that will lessen demand on the West Conference Room.
➢ City Council Chambers - Install new carpet and seating in the Council Chambers
The agreement with BOA will provide plans and specifications for the improvements described
above. The estimated cost of this construction is $250,000
Video and sound system upgrades previously contemplated for the Council Chambers will be
accomplished through a separate design and installation effort
67 3
02/28/2006 17 24 FAX 310831
I ebniary 28, 2006
4656 BUA Arcnizecuure
Architecture
Sernrn` _
City o1E1 Segundo
City Hall
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
EiTT Steven Fmton
Director of Public Works
RE Fee Proposal for Renovations to City Hall
Dear Mr Fmton
BOA is pleased to present this fee proposal for a renovation of office spaces, toilet rooms
and council chambers as discussed during our site meeting held of Jan 26 -06
Below is a summary of the project scope of work as I understand it Please do not
1-esitate to revise as you see fit
u 1i3rTTRA 1
1 Human Resources
Demo Some Walls
Remove existing passage
Install new corridor to Lunch Rm
Remove Cot Rm
2 Conference Room
Dress -up the existing Conference Rm
Demolish wall between Conf Rm and off on outsidewall
Add mini-kitchen
Add A V equipment space
3 New Attorney's Office (Next to Conference in)
Add new door leading from Main Corridor to Office
4 Council Chambers
New Seating
New Carpet
(Sound System be the City)
5 Toilet Rooms (Adjacent to Council Chambers)
Complete renovation of the Men's and Women's Toilet Rooms to make
Accessible (ADA Compliant)
6 Drinking Fountains
Change existing drinking fountains to make them Accessible.
FEB -28-2006 17.21 3106314656 96%
o 7 li
P 02
02/28/2006 17 25 FAX 3108314656 BOA AretiltectUre
For the above scope we estunate an approximate construction cost of S250 000
Our Fee Proposal covers full 4zchittctural/F-ngmeenng Services from schematic
design through construction services If full construction services are not required the
fee can be adjusted accordingly
Total Fixed fee: 531,200
See the attached FIXED FEE SCHEDULE of a breakdown of the fee
Sincerely, %
}6rry St�un�, Architect
FEB -28 -2006 17 23 3108314666 99%
075
P 03
02/28/2006 17 25 FAX 3108314656 BOA Archltecture
FIXED FEE-El Segundo City Hall Remodel
ror City of E I Segunco by Jerry Sturm, Architect BOA Architiecture
date February 28, 2006 Approx Construction Cost Estimate $250,000
DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
an
client mtg tc ascertain program, scope of work
4 hrs
130
520
electrical
project management, consultant coordination
2 hrs
130
260
site analysi<,photos,code check,site measurema
2 hrs
130
260
1,040
SCHEMATIC DESIGN (PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE)
Schematic Design
8 hrs
13D
1,040
CADD
12 hrs
78
936
project management, consultant coordination
4 hrs
102
408
1- meetings with City staff
3 hrs
130
390
refine schernatic design per client comments
2 hrs
102
204
preliminary cost estimate
0 hrs
102
0
2,978
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
refine scheratic design w consultant input
4 hrs
130
520
CADD to re -me schematic design
4 hrs
78
312
T1 title sheet,budding data,plot plan,general not(
6 hrs
78
458
Al sheet30, 42,site plan, demo plan
10 hrs
78
780
A2 sheet 3Cx42,floor plan,ceding plan
30 hrs
78
2,340
A3 sheet 3Cx42, enlarged plans schedules
20 hrs
78
1,560
A4 sht 30x42 wall sections,mtenor elevations
20 hrs
78
1,560
AS sht 30x42, construction details
15 hrs
72
1,080
AS sht 30x42,b1d9 dept notes, access complian
10 hrs
72
720
project management
16 hrs
102
1,632
compile draNmgs at75 %,95%
10 hrs
72
720
compile specs at 95%
8 hrs
102
816
resolve client corrections /comments
10 hrs
102
1,020
bldg dept corrections /submittals /resubm(ttal
8 hrs
90
720
client meetings -one
3 hrs
130
390
compile cost estimate at 75%
4 hrs
102
408
quality Conti of review at 95%
8 hrs
102
816
15,862
CONSULTANTS
structural -none anticipated
0
mechanical, plumbing
1,500
electrical
1,000
soils report
0
environmental lab - asbestos testing /report 0
Lighting, AudiolVisual Design Consultant 0
2,500
TOTAL DESIGN PHASE FEE $22,380
CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
HOURS UNIT HR RATE COST TOTAL TOTAL
BIDDING
pre -bid meeting -none 0 hrs 130 0
resolve questions, addendums 4 hrs 130 520
520 076
FEB -28 -2006 17.23 3108314656 97% P.04
02/28/2006 17 27 FAX 3108314bbb nUa nrculLeCLuie
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
pre- constru,:tion meeting -one
/--site mtgs
3 hrs 130 390
15 hrs 130 2,080
RFI /submittals /shop dwg, 2 -nrs per week for 24 48 hrs 102 4,896
record CADD drawings -none 6 hrs 78 468
7,834
MISC EXPENSES
blueprints 220
color render tng, scale model 0
photos, pnotocopy of specifications, mist photocopies, courier, mail /delivery 246
466
FEE FOR REIMBURSIBLES, BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION ADMIN $8,820
TOTAL FEE $31,200
NOTES AND RESTRICTIONS
1 Scope of Work based on Site Conference with Mr Finton on Jan 26, 2006
2 Civil survay, Soils Report, Hazardous materials Report, Civil engineering, Audio /visual and landscape architecture are
3 BOA reserves the right to renegotiate fees due to delays
4 BONS Fee is based on early estimate of construction cost of $250,000
5 Bluepnnt!, for Bidding are NOT included
FES -28 -2006 17 25 31OB314656 97%
077
P 05
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 21, 2006
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDAHEADING: COnsentAgenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION
Consideration and possible action to approve a Facility Relocation Agreement with the Los
Angeles County Flood Control District for the relocation of a 45 " water main and the grant of
an easement for the County Waterline in City property, in conjunction with the Douglas Street
Gap Closure Project
(Fiscal Impact — None)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Managerto execute a Facility Relocation Agreement
with the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, (2) Authorize the City Manager to execute
an easement document granting a pipeline easement to the Los Angeles County Flood Control
District, and /or (3) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION-
The Los Angeles County Flood Control District (County) owns and operates a network of water
pipelines and infection wells along the South Bay coastline This system, named West Coast
Basin Barrier Protect, injects fresh water into the ground water basin to prevent contamination
of the aquifer by sea water intrusion
and discussion continued on the next
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS*
1- February 7, 2006 Letter from the County
2- Map of Easement
3- Facility Relocation Agreement
4- Easement Document
FISCAL IMPACT-
Operating Budget*
NA
Capital Improvement Program:
NA
Amount Requested,
NA
Account Number*
NA
Project Phase:
NA
Appropriation Required:
NA
ORIGINATED BY. DATE-
Ste en Finton, Director of Public Works
U7$
06.03 -07 Cty L A Fac Reloc Agree 1 1
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: (continued)
Facility Relocation Easement - A 45" diameter barrier pipeline runs through the Douglas
Street Gap Closure project area and must be relocated to make way for the new roadway
The City secured a permit from the County to relocate this pipeline and the relocation work has
been included in the City's current construction contract The permit requires the City to enter
into the recommended Facility Relocation Agreement (Agreement) The main points of the
Agreement are as follows
➢ The City shall relocate the County's pipeline at its sole expense
➢ The City shall grant a pipeline easement to the County for operation and maintenance
of the pipeline along the final alignment. This easement shall provide priority rights
over easement rights possessed by the City
Grant of Easement - The existing County pipeline is in easements within City, Railroad and
Edison properties The County has permitted the City to relocate their pipeline provided that
the City grant the County an easement for the pipeline that has priority rights over the City's
easement rights Under typical utility easements, the utility owner must relocate its facility if
requested to do so by the property owner. The priority easement protects the County from
costs related to relocation requests
The easement to be granted is within the City -owned parking lot on the north side of the
project The recommended easement grant will provide an easement to the County f 0' wide
by approximately 250' long through the City's parking lot as shown on the attached map
06 -03 -07 Cty L A Fee Reloc Agree
DONALD L WOLFE, Detector
February 7, 2006
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
"To Enrich Lives Through Effective and caring Service"
Mr ct�R+tmfep-
City Engineer
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245 -3813
Dear Mr Finley
900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE
ALHAMHRA, CALIFORNIA 91803 -1331
Telephone (626)458 -5100
www Iadpw org ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO
P O BOX 1460
ALHANMRA CALIFORNIA 91802 -1460
IN REPLY PLEASE
REFER TO FILE MP -2
176 021
IR E C E VV c:','-
FEB i U ZOOS
PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING
WEST COAST BASIN BARRIER PROJECT - PARCEL 69WA
AFFECTS DOUGLAS STREET GAP CLOSURE AND GRADE SEPARATION
FACILITY RELOCATION AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT
In January of 2005, the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works issued a
Permit to the City of El Segundo for the relocation and reconstruction of the
Los Angeles County Flood Control District's 45 -inch water pipeline, as part of the work
necessary to construct the Douglas Street Gap Closure Project (copy enclosed) In
December, former City Engineer Bellur Devaraj informed me that the City recently had a
groundbreaking ceremony and issued a notice to proceed with construction of their
project. Congratulations on reaching this major milestone.
A condition of the Permit was for the City to enter into a Facility Relocation Agreement
with the District prior to relocation and to grant a replacement easement for the
waterline Upon execution and recording of both documents, the District will
recommend the Quitclaim of Easements in Parcels 69EX and 48EX to the underlying
fee owners
Enclosed, for your counsel's review and approval, is a clean draft of the Facility
Relocation Agreement, along with an original and duplicate Easement document for
Parcel 69WA, West Coast Basin Barrier Project Also enclosed is another set of right of
way maps showing the location of the existing and proposed water pipeline At this
time, we request that your office process both documents for City Council approval and
execution. Please return the fully executed original Easement and Facility Relocation
Agreement for our acceptance and recording. The duplicates are for your records until
a conformed copy of each is returned to the City.
it80
Sfevt � I . ..-
Febru ary 7, 2006
Page 2
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me by
telephone at (626) 458 -7066, or e-mail me at fumina @ladpw.org, Monday through
Thursday, from 7 30 a m. to 6:00 p m
Very truly yours,
DONALD L WOLFE
Director of Public Works
FRANK L. UMINA, Senior Real Property Agent
Acquisition & Revenue Properties Section
Mapping & Property Management Division
FLU.psr
P2 XFLU WCOAST BASIN
Enc
(:81
( j
| ~
!
k \ \.
slit
| } 2
w a
k -
§A�a.
E�§
§ �
k
)
§
k
0
1 :
| �
_ |r
.§
� . \
[ '
§
� \\
m �
a. �
/ }/ \�
_ !
Z
.\ \
------------
y- .
_
�.-
��'
" 3 -I
I m
q
\
z
/
LU
.
2
i[
w
O
w
0
o
q
WEST COAST BASIN BARRIER PROJECT
Parcel 69WA
Affects Douglas Street Gap Closure and
Grade Separation Project
Assessor's Identification Nos..
4138 -010 -900 (Portions in streets),
4138 - 012 -800 (Portions in streets),
4138 - 012 -900, and 902 (Portions in streets)
Portions of Douglas Street Contained in
Final Construction Drawings
Pages W -7, W -8, and W -9
FACILITY RELOCATION AGREEMENT
This Agreement made this day of , 2006, by and
between the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, a body corporate and politic
(hereinafter referred to as DISTRICT), and the City of El Segundo, a municipal
corporation (hereinafter referred to as CITY)
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, CITY is planning construction of the Douglas Street Gap Closure and
Grade Separation Project (hereinafter referred to as PROJECT), between Park Place
North and Alaska Avenue in the City of El Segundo, and
WHEREAS, CITY is acquiring easements for public road and highway purposes over
private property to operate and maintain the PROJECT, and
WHEREAS, DISTRICT owns, operates, and maintains a 45 -inch water pipeline for its
West Coast Basin Barrier Protect (hereinafter referred to as PIPELINE) by virtue of the
following rights:
• An easement for water PIPELINE purposes from the City of El Segundo
recorded on February 28, 1964, as Official Records Document
No ORD2377 -732.
• An easement for water PIPELINE purposes from Southern California
Edison Company (SCE), recorded on March 11, 1971, as Official Records
Document No. D4993 -907
• By Notice of Action, recorded May 28, 1962, as Official Records
No. M1025 -339, Superior Court of Los Angeles Case No 796583 The
DISTRICT was plaintiff under an action to condemn a permanent
easement for a water PIPELINE in a portion of this property, defendants
named as Farr Company, The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
Company, et al The Order of Immediate Possession was filed August 29,
1962 The property is now owned by the Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). 083
Facility Relocation Agreement
WHEREAS, a portion of DISTRICT's PIPELINE will interfere with and obstruct the
construction of the PROJECT, and
WHEREAS, CITY desires to relocate DISTRICT's PIPELINE at its sole cost and
expense to eliminate such interference and obstruction; and
WHEREAS, on January 11, 2005, DISTRICT issued the CITY Permit No 2002 -758
authorizing the relocation of DISTRICT's PIPELINE upon execution of this Facility
Relocation Agreement, and the CITY granting a replacement easement for that portion
of the PIPELINE outside of public road right of way; and
WHEREAS, this Facility Relocation Agreement will outline the obligations and
responsibilities of the parties
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants herein
contained, DISTRICT and CITY agree as follows,
1 CITY shall remove and thereafter relocate, at CITY's sole cost and expense,
those portions of the PIPELINE as shown on final construction drawings titled
Douglas Street Gap Closure — 45" WATER RELOCATION PLAN AND PROFILE
- STA 8 + 68 75 to STA 20 + 11 69 on pages W -7, W -8, and W -9, attached
hereto as Exhibit A and as authorized under DISTRICT Permit No. 2002 -758
attached hereto as Exhibit B.
2 CITY shall grant the DISTRICT an easement for waterline purposes over a
portion of Assessor's Parcel No. 4138 - 010 -900 (Parcel 69WA), as described in
the enclosed Easement Deed
3 CITY acknowledges the above - referenced DISTRICT easements and priority of
said easements over CITY's easements In the event of a future use,
realignment, relocation, reconstruction of Douglas Street which necessitates a
realignment, relocation, reconstruction or removal of all or a portion of
DISTRICT's PIPELINE, CITY agrees to notify DISTRICT in writing.
4 DISTRICT agrees to notify CITY, in writing, prior to commencing any
maintenance and repair work on the PIPELINE that may impact traffic on
Douglas Street.
5 This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors
and assigns of the respective parties hereto.
2 (81
Facility Relocation Agreement
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said DISTRICT, a body corporate and politic, as authorized
by Los Angeles County Code Title 2, Division 2, Chapter 2 18, et seq , and attested to
by the County Clerk and the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation, have
caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officers pursuant to its by-
laws or pursuant to a resolution adopted by its CITY Council
(City Sea])
ATTEST
LZ
City Clerk
ATTEST
Registrar- Recorder /County Clerk
of the County of Los Angeles
0
Deputy County Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM.
RAYMOND G FORTNER,JR
County Counsel
M
Deputy
FLU pSr\P2 \FLU DOUGLAS STAGMT
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
a municipal corporation
0
Jeff Stewart, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM
MARK D HENSLEY, CITY ATTORNEY
Karl H Berger, Assistant City Attorney
LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT, a body corporate and politic
0
Chair, Board of Supervisors of the
Los Angeles County Flood Control District
3
l'� J
y�GELES COG LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
9 2 FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAILING ADDRESS
` 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE P 0 BOX 1460
P Bu woR ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803 -1331 Alhambra, CA 91802 -1460
� O�
�SeM��,� PERMIT
FACILITY West Coast Basin Barrier Project
C -3
FILE NO
176 032
PERMITTEE City Of El Segundo
PERMIT NO
2002 -758
c/o Parsons
JOB NO
CMJM99INSP
100 West Walnut Street
TELEPHONE
(626) 440 -6100
Pasadena, CA 91124
Attn Pete Tuccllio
PURPOSE OF PERMIT
To authorize the work described In Provision No 3 affecting the subject stream In accordance with the submitted
plans, District Drawing Nos 176 -F184 1 to 7 (Department Drawing Nos PF509880 to PF509885 and PF509895)
APPLICATION DATED
FEES PLAN CHECK
INSPECTION
ANNUAL
November 21, 2002 PERMIT ISSUED January 11, 2005 EXPIRES See Provision No. I
Actual Cost'
BY AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DATED MARCH 26, 1950
Waived" DONALD- LMWOLFpE, INTERIM DIR%EECTOR F PUBLIC WORKS
$ None
BY
NELSON D NELSON, Permits and Subdivisions Section,
'City Service Request No 11398 Construction Division
—City of El Segundo shall provide inspection
THIS PERMIT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE HEREOF EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY MODIFIED IN THE ADDITIONAL
PROVISIONS LISTED BELOW AND AS LISTED ON THE ATTACHMENT ENTITLED ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS FOR PERMIT NUMBER 2002-758"
1 PERMITTEE MUST NOTIFY PERMIT OFFICE NO 3 (8 00 A M TO 4 00 P M) AT TELEPHONE (310) 649.6300 AT LEAST 24 HOURS BEFORE STARTING ANY
WORK UNDER THIS PERMIT FAILURE TO SO NOTIFY IS CAUSE FOR REVOCATION OF PERMIT SHOULD PERMITTEE FAIL TO TAKE ACTION WITHIN 160
DAYS FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT OR FAIL TO ACTIVELY AND DILIGENTLY EXERCISE THE PRIVILEGES OF THIS PERMIT, THE PERMIT
BECOMES NULL AND VOID
2 PERMITTEE SHALL NOTIFY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT AT 1- 6004224133 AT LEAST 24 HOURS BEFORE COMMENCING ANY EXCAVATION
NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE WORK AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT
3 Facility Station Work Description
Location
West Coast Basin NIA Relocate a 45 -mch Class 200 Steel Cylinder Near the Intersection of Douglas Strec-
Barrier Project Concrete Pipe (SCCP) per submitted plans and Rosecrans Avenue In the City of E:
Segundo (TG 732 -J3)
4 PERMITTEE SHALL NOTIFY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION - OPERATIONS SECTION AT (626) 456. 6177 46 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF THE 454NCH
WATER LINE REPLACEMENT,
5. PERMITTEE SHALL GRANT AN EASEMENT TO THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND EXECUTE A FACILITY RELOCATION
AGREEMENT PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.
LC Ih
O 1SectlonlPertm49lFlood\Permrts and AmendmentsI2002 -758 doc
Attach
Lm- AnIBIT El
L
cc Design (Ajaelo, Soliman), Flood Maintenance (South), Mapping and Property Management (Hinkley, Miyamoto),
Water Resources (Hildebrand), Construction (Office, P O 3)
A COPY OF THIS SHALL BE KEPT AT THE SITE OF THE WORK THROUGHOUT THE PERIOD OF OPERATIONS WITHIN DISTRICT RIGHTS OF WAY AND SHALL BE SHOWN TO ANY DISTRICT
REPRESENTATIVE OR ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER UPON DEMAND EXERCISE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL INDICATE ACCEPTANCE OF AND AGREEMENT TO COMPLY WITH ALL PROVISIONS
INCLUDED HEREIN VIOLATION OF ANY PROVISION SHALL BE CAUSE FOR IMMEDIATE REVOCATION OF PERMIT
STANDARD PERMIT
PROVISIONS
A This permit is valid only for the purpose specked herein No change of program as outlined In application or
drawings submitted with application is permitted except upon written permission of the Chief Engineer
B Activities and uses authorized under this permit are subject to any Instructions of the Chief Engineer or his
representative ALL INSTRUCTIONS MUST BE STRICTLY OBSERVED
C Perinittee shall assume entire responsibility for all activities and uses under this permit and shall save the
District free and harmless from any and all expense, cost or liability in connection with or resulting from the
exercise of this permit Including, but not limited to, property damage, personal injury, and wrongful death
D Any damage caused to Flood Control structures by reason of exercise of this permit shall be repaired at the
cost of the permittee to the satisfaction of the District Should permittee neglect to promptly make repairs,
District may make repairs or have repairs made and permittee will be billed and shall pay costs
E Any structure or portions thereof or plantings placed on District rights of way or which affect District structures
must be removed, revised, and/or relocated by permittee without cost to the District, or any other public
agency the District shall so designate, should future activities or policy so require
F This permit is valid only to the extent of District jurisdiction. Permits required by other Interested agencies and
consent of underlying fee owner of District easement lands are the responsibility of the permittee. NOTHING
CONTAINED IN THIS PERMIT SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS A RELINQUISHMENT OF ANY RIGHTS NOW
HELD BY THE DISTRICT.
G This permit Is subject to prior unexpired permits, agreements, easements, privilege or other rights, whether
recorded or unrecorded in the area specified by this permit. Permlttee shall make his own arrangements with
holders of such prior rights
H Unless otherwise specified herein, this permit may be revoked or canceled at any time by the Chief Engineer
when required for flood control or conservation purposes.
1. Upon written notice of cancellation or revocation of this permit for any cause whatsoever, permittee shall
restore District right of way and structures to their condition prior to the Issuance of the permit and then shall
vacate District property Should permittee neglect to restore the premises or structures to a condition
satisfactory to the Chief Engineer, the District may perform such work or have work performed, and permittee
agrees to reimburse the District for all costs of the work so performed upon receipt of a statement therefore.
J In the event of a District employee work stoppage, the Chief Engineer reserves the right to suspend all activity
and operations by this permit which require Inspection by representatives of the District Operations and
activity authorized by the permit shall not resume until district approval to do so is given
K Unless otherwise specifically provided, all costs incurred by permittee, as a result of the conditions of the permit
or the exercise by District of any right, authority, or reservation contained therein shall be the sole
responsibility of and shall be borne entirely by the permittee
-OM1SecUmV)a MUY-amsWRC%ASIONSTANOARD doe
h
i-
087
i 3
� ka
�a x
O � p
C
av ^�,rt 9
LL a lc�+ -.
I /•��
.n. •wormy v- -
Ln
i N a 4 O i
_
e 0
w�
I eI x
cr a n•'U ( •I
a
G,
%,•Hw J •/
0 =1
o
o
x -rt—ys n onoa 6
a a
w
a
0
z a
m
N
u
m
b
u
N
1119
T57
..• p`�GyP�
•`
• e4 �P
O
O
a
CL
J u
1
W
O
N u
u
a
°
c
�
� 1. 5-,
U
z
a
ya �
�
Y
1
N
Yi
- --
-:
zl.,
I
I
ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS FOR PERMIT NUMBER 2002 -758
1 Use of District's right of way or performance of the work or activity authorized under this permit is
tantamount to agreeing to the conditions herein (131)
2 Permittee shall be responsible for notifying his contractor and all subcontractors of the provisions of this
permit No work will be started until a copy of this permit is given to the contractor and each of his
subcontractors Further, the copy will be left at the site of the work being done by each contractor (G2)
3 Permittee is notified that in accordance with the STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION SAFETY
ORDERS, Section 1503, the permittee or his contractor may be required to acquire a permit from
CAIJOSHA if the work authorized herein involves excavations more than five feet deep The inspection
provided by the District can in no way be construed as a safety inspection (G3)
4 Unless notified otherwise in this permit, all work authorized by this permit shall conform to the latest
edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Work Construction, as amended, and published by
Budding News, Inc , 1612 South Clementine Street, Anaheim, CA 92802 and the latest edition of the Los
Angeles County Department of Public Works "Additions and Amendments to the Standard Specifications
for Public Works Construction". (G4)
5 This permit is subject to such further conditions as the Director or his representative may issue during the
period of this use When possible, such additional conditions shall be promptly delivered in writing to the
address shown on page one of this permit Conditions delivered orally of necessity shall be promptly
confirmed in writing (G5)
6 Upon completion of work authorized under this permit, permittee shall restore the area to the satisfaction
of the District's representative (G14) -"
7 The District shall not be responsible for the maintenance or replacement of the paving (G50)
8 Permittee shall protect in place all District facilities where the proposed work comes in close proximity to
the District facilities (G52)
9 Any damage to District or County facilities is to be repaired upon receiving notice of damage (E11)
10. Permittee shall be responsible for the selection and implementation of Best Management Practices
(BMP's) for construction activities If the Director or authorized representative determines that additional
BMP's or corrective steps for existing ones are necessary, permittee shall immediately comply with the
requests (P2)
11 Permittee shall notify WRD- Operations at (626) 458 -6177 48 -hours prior to the start of the 45 -inch water
line replacement
EXH'
089
PERMIT SUMMARY
PERMIT NO 2002 -758
PERMIT WRITER
Luis A Cervantes
1 Permittee's Contact Information
Owner
City of El Segundo (310) 524 -2358
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Agent,
Parsons (626) 440 -6100
100 West Walnut Street
Pasadena, CA 91124
Attn Pete Tuccillo
2 Application Date
November 21, 2004
3 Description of work
Relocate a 45 -inch Class 200 Steel Cylinder Concrete Pipe (SCCP) per submitted
plans
4 Jurisdiction
Name and description of facility impacted by the proposed system.
This 45 -inch water line is part of the West Coast Basin Barrier Project
Operated and Maintained by LACFCD
LACDPW R/W Status Easement — MPM issued directive to add provision no 5 shown on the face of the
permit
5 LACDPW Inspection Secondary
6 Maintenance responsibility of proposed facility
LACDPW
7. Discharge Information N/A — pipe relocation only,
8 Background Information WRD requested Permits to manage review coordination for this project Plans were sent to
MPM, WSD, WRD, DES, and FMD -S on 12118/02 WSD had no comments 12/24102 DES
returned comments 01/22/03 WRD returned comments 02/04/03 FMD -S returned comments
01/20/03 Comments sent to Parsons 02113103. Resubmltal received 03106 and sent to WRD,
DES, FMD -S, and MPM on 03127/03. FMD -S had no further comments 04 /11/03 DES had no
further comments 04/30/04 WRD returned comments 05/06/03 Comments sent to permlttee
05/06/03 Resubmital received 10106/03 WRD comments back - checked in -house MPM gave
conditional clearance via email on 01/11/05 The proposed relocation will have a negligible
impact on the wasting system
9 Fees Plan Check Fee $ Actual Cost
Inspection Fee Waived — provided by City of El Segundo
10 Recommendations Construction Division (Permits) recommends permit be Issued
PLICATE
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND MAIL TO'
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
P O. Box 1460
Alhambra, CA 91802 -1460
Attention Mapping & Property
Management Division
R/W Engineering Section
THIS DOCUMENT IS EXEMPT FROM DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX
PURSUANT TO SECTION 11922 OF THE REVENUE & TAXATION CODE
Assessor's Identification Number
THIS DOCUMENT IS EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES PURSUANT 4138 - 010 -900 (Portion)
TO SECTION 27383 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
EASEMENT
For a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City ", does
hereby grant to the LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, a body corporate
and politic, hereinafter referred to as "District ", a perpetual easement for water line purposes and
other appurtenances in, on, over, under, and across the real property in the City of El Segundo,
County of Los Angeles, State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this
reference made a part hereof.
Together with the further right to enter upon, pass, and repass over and along said
easement and right of way and to deposit tools, implements, and other materials thereon by said
District, Its officers, agents, and employees, and by persons under contract with it and their
employees, whenever and wherever necessary for the purposes above set forth
The easement herein granted by City is for the purpose of relocation, reconstruction,
operation, and maintenance of District's existing pipeline facilities (water line and appurtenances),
in connection with its West Coast Basin Barrier Project and the future Douglas Street Gap
Closure Project City agrees and acknowledges that District's easement rights shall be
paramount and /or prior to any title or estates of City Furthermore, City shall be responsible for
any and all costs incurred by District as a result of City's actions which cause the pipeline to be
relocated, realigned, or removed (including, but not limited to, the design, documentation,
processing, and /or removal of facilities).
File with- WEST COAST BASIN
BARRIER PROJECT 69WA
Affects Douglas Street 2 -2
176 -RW 4
SD 4 M02D6854
EXHIBIT" C
091
WEST COAST BASIN
BARRIER PROJECT 69WA
Easement Page 2
City agrees that it will not perform or arrange for the performance of any construction or
reconstruction work in conjunction with the relocation, realignment, or removal of said facilities,
until the plans and specifications of such construction or reconstruction work shall have been
submitted to and been approved in writing by the Chief Engineer of District.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, on 20 ,
the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation, has caused this Easement document to be
executed by its duly authorized officer pursuant to a resolution adopted by its City Council
(City Seal)
ATTEST
City Clerk
OAGan
P Conf eWST CSTBBP69W doc
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
a municipal corporation
a
City Manager
NOTE: Acknowledgment form on reverse side
092
EXHIBIT A
File with
Affects
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
WEST COAST BASIN
BARRIER PROJECT 69WA
Douglas Street 2 -2
176 -RW 4
A.P N 4138- 010 -900 (portion)
T G 732(J3)
I M 069 -157
Fourth District
M02D6854
PARCEL NO. 69WA (Easement for water line purposes and other appurtenances)
Part A
That portion of Lot 22, Tract No 26557, as shown on map recorded in Book
675, pages 95 to 98, inclusive, of Maps, in the office of the Recorder of the County
of Los Angeles, within a strip of land 10 00 feet wide, lying 5 00 feet on each side
of the following described center line
Beginning at the intersection of the easterly prolongation of the center line
of Park Place, 60 feet wide, and a line parallel with and 10 feet easterly, measured
at right angles, from the center line of Douglas Street, 78 feet wide, as both said
center lines are shown on map filed in Book 145, pages 21 and 22, of Record of
Surveys, in the office of said Recorder, thence North 0 000'39" West along said
center line of Douglas Street, a distance of 456 00 feet to the beginning of a
tangent curve concave to the east and having a radius of 340 00 feet, thence
northwesterly along said curve, through a central angle of 40 022'30 ", an are
distance of 239 59 feet, thence tangent to said curve North 40 023'09" West 204 41
feet to a point, said point hereby designated as Point "A ", thence continuing
North 40 °23'09" West 12 47 feet, thence North 85 023'09" West 31 18 feet to the
northeasterly line of the southwesterly 2 feet of said Lot 22, thence northwesterly
along said northeasterly line to the northwesterly boundary of said lot
Containing 2,444 ± square feet
6193
Part B
That portion of above - mentioned Lot 22, within a strip of land 10 00 feet
wide, lying 5 00 feet on each side of the following described center line
Beginning at above - designated Point "A ", thence North 49 036'51" East 60 00 feet
EXCEPTING therefrom any portion lying the within above - described Part A
Containing 550 t square feet
Total area of Parts A and B containing 2,994 t square feet
AA C RWE FLEGIM02D6854 �^ ♦V �
(8 -3 -04) 7 4
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 21, 2006
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION.
Consideration and possible action regarding the adoption of a resolution declaring the City's
intent to conduct a public hearing on May 2, 2006 regarding the transfer of a Pipeline
Franchise Agreement, Ordinance No 1255, from Equilon California Pipeline Company LLC to
Shell California Pipeline Company LLC and extension of said Pipeline Franchise Agreement
for a ten -year period (Fiscal Impact = $2,715, annual franchise fee)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION.
Recommendation — (1) Adopt a resolution declaring the City's intent to conduct a public
hearing on May 2, 2006 regarding the transfer of a Pipeline Franchise Agreement, Ordinance
No 1255, from Equilon California Pipeline Company LLC to Shell California Pipeline Company
LLC and extension of said Pipeline Franchise Agreement for a ten -year period, and (2)
Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
On June 4, 1996, the City of El Segundo entered into a non - exclusive Pipeline Franchise
Agreement ( "Pipeline Franchise ", Ordinance No. 1255) with Shell California Pipeline Company
for a ten -year period ending on April 19, 2006 to lay and use pipelines consisting of a single
line of pipe six inches (6 ") in internal diameter and a single line of pipe eight inches (8 ") in
internal diameter for the transportation of petroleum products in, under, along, and across
public streets in the City of El Segundo as shown on the attached map
(Please see "Background and Discussion" on following page)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS.
Map
Application from Shell California Pipeline Company
Resolution of Intent
Resolution No 4093
Ordinance No 1255
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget:
NA
Amount Requested:
NA
Account Number:
NA
Project Phase-
NA
Appropriation Required.
No
95
2
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: (continued)
On October 6, 1998, the City of El Segundo, by Resolution No. 4093, transferred Franchise
Ordinance No 1255 to Equilon California Pipeline Company LLC due to the merger of Texaco
and Shell Oil Company
On February 20, 2006, the City of El Segundo received an application from Shell California
Pipeline Company LLC, the successor in interest to Equilon California Pipeline Company LLC,
to extend the Pipeline Franchise for an additional ten year period ending on April 19, 2016
Shell California Pipeline Company has also requested that the Franchise Ordinance be
transferred to Shell California Pipeline Company due to the cancellation of the Shell/Texaco
Merger
Pursuant to the Public Utilities Code, extension of the Pipeline franchise requires that the City
declare its intent to extend the franchise and hold a public hearing to consider all oral and
written testimony regarding the Pipeline Franchise before determining whether to grant the
Pipeline Franchise or extension thereof Notice of said public hearing must published at least
one time within fifteen (15) days after the resolution of intent is adopted in a newspaper of
general circulation. The resolution of intent sets the public hearing for the Council Meeting of
May 2, 2006 Declaration of the City's intent to extend the Pipeline Franchise provides for the
continuation of the franchise agreement through to the date of the public hearing
0 9 G
i ICI
i
i
r � I
�i
x�
4. a�
LC
CD h
eAd CD
I] _ y_
w
a,
z
I i � �•. •CLii �_1�. � fi$ tFYl u. ky.... �`f r
097
0110512006 19.26
[vie
3108162235
SHE_.L WESTERN REGION
PAGE 01
Shell Pipeline Company LP
Western Region - Land & Permitting
20945 5 Wilmington Ave
Corson, CA 90810-1039
2 -20 -06
Steve Finton
Director of Public Works
City of El Segundo
350 Mam Street
El Segundo, CA90245
(310) 5242356
(31 O) 640 -0489 fax
Steve Finton,
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ORDINANCE NO 1255 (Supercedes 758,759 & 1199)
VENTURA. PRODUCTS R/W TL I2 -16 & LA PRODUCTS R/W 11 -14
Shell California Pipeline Company LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
( "Shell'), formerly known as Equilon California Pipeline Company LLC, requests an
amendment to Ordinance No 1255 to extend the term for an additional ten year period The
franchise agreement addresses the operation and maintenance of the 6" VPL (Ventura Products
Line - R/W No 16) and the 8" LAXPDX (LAX Products Line - R/W No 14) under City streets
The current franchise agreement expires on April 19, 2006
Shell shall pay the City of El Segundo an annual franchise fee which complies with the
Franchise Act of 1937 (Public Utilities Code sections 6201, et seq )
Please send the agreement for processing to 20945 S Wilmington Avenue, Carson, CA
9081 O Should you have any concerns, feel free to contact me at (310) 816 -2208 Thank you for
your help and consideration with this matter
Sincerely,
i" e (/0—
Ed Anderson
Contract Land Agent
MAR -01 -2006 15.26 3108162235 97%
098
P.01
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S
INTENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 2,
2006 REGARDING TRANSFERING AN OIL PIPELINE
FRANCHISE TO SHELL CALIFORNIA PIPELINE COMPANY
LLC AND EXTENDING THAT FRANCHISE FOR TEN (10)
YEARS.
The City Council does resolve as follows
SECTION 1 The City Council finds and declares that
A. By Ordinance No. 1255, adopted June 4, 1996, the City of El Segundo
entered into a non - exclusive Franchise Agreement ('Pipeline Franchise ")
with Shell California Pipeline Company for a ten year period ending on
April 19, 2006 to lay and use pipelines consisting of a single line of pipe
six inches (6 ") in internal diameter and a single line of pipe eight inches
(8 ") in internal diameter for the transportation of petroleum products in,
under, along, and across public street in the City of El Segundo,
B Through Resolution No 4093, adopted October 6, 1998, the City
transferred the Pipeline Franchise to Equilon California Pipeline Company
LLC due to the merger of affiliated companies of Texaco and Shell Oil
Company, and
C On February 20, 2006, the City of El Segundo received an application
from Shell California Pipeline Company LLC, the successor in interest to
Equilon California Pipeline Company LLC, to extend the Pipeline
Franchise for an additional ten year period
SECTION 2 Pursuant to Public Utilities Code § 6232, the City Council declares its
intent to conduct a public hearing on May 2, 2006 at 7 00 p m in the City Council
Chambers at 350 Main Street, El Segundo, to consider all oral and written testimony
regarding the Pipeline Franchise before determining whether to grant the Pipeline
Franchise extension and assign the Pipeline Franchise to Shell California Pipeline
Company LLC
SECTION 3 The City Clerk is directed to pt iblish public notice of the public hearing
(including all requirements set forth in Public Utilities Code § 6233) at least one time
within fifteen (15) days after this Resolution is adopted in a newspaper of general
circulation
099
Page 2 of 2
SECTION 4 This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption and
remain effective unless superseded by a subsequent resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 215t day of March, 2006
APPROVED
Mark D Hen
�W�Affi
Kelly McDowell, Mayor
Attorney
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the whole number of members of the City Council of the said City is five,
that the foregoing resolution, being RESOLUTION NO was duly passed and
adopted by the said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and
attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of the said Council held
on the 21st day of March, 2006, and the same was so passed and adopted by the
following vote
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
ABSTENTION
NOT PARTICIPATING
WITNESS MY HAND THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF SAID CITY this 21St day of
March, 2006
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
Of the City of El Segundo,
California
(SEAL)
Page 2 of 2 9 0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 4093
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
TRANSFER OF FRANCHISE ORDINANCE NO. 1255 TO
EQUILON CALIFORNIA PIPELINE COMPANY LLC FROM
SHELL PIPE LINE CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the City of El Segundo has entered into a non - exclusive Franchise
Agreement with Shell Pipe Line Corporation pursuant to Ordinance No 1255 to lay and use
pipelines consisting of a single line of pipe six inches (6 ") in diameter and a single line of pipe
eight inches (8 ") in internal diameter for the transportation of petroleum products m, under,
along, and across the public streets in the City of El Segundo, and
WHEREAS, the pipelines operated under Ordinance No 1255 and the Franchise
Agreement, are in the process of being transferred to Equilon California Pipeline Company LLC,
as a result of a merger between Texaco and Shell Oil Company, and
WHEREAS, according to Section 17 -C of the Franchise Agreement, the City shall not
unreasonably withhold its consent to a Franchise transfer, and
WHEREAS, according to Section 17 -A of the Franchise Agreement, the grantee shall not
transfer ownership without the prior consent of the City expressed by resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS OLLOWS
SECTION 1 The City Council of the City of El Segundo, California, approves the
transfer and assignment of the Franchise Agreement, Ordinance No 1255, to Equrlon California
Pipeline Company, subject to all terms and conditions of the original agreement
RESOLUTION NO 4093
APPROVING FRANCHISE TRANSFER
FROM SHELL PIPELINE CORP
TO EQUILON CALIFORNIA PIPELINE CO . 01
PAGE NO 1
PASSED AND APPROVED this 6� day of October, 1998io"
MIKE GORDON, MAYOR
ATTEST
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the
whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution
No 4093 was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor
of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council
held on the 6th day of October, 1998, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following
vote
AYES Gordon, Jacobs, McDowell, Games, Wemick
NOES None
ABSENT None
ABSTAIN None
CINDY ieE SEN, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM
� ✓ JW
MARK EENSLEY, CITY ATtORNEY
RESOLUTION NO 4093
APPROVING FRANCHISE TRANSFER
FROM SHELL PIPE LINE CORP
TO EQUiLON CALIFORNIA PIPELINE CO
PAGE NO 2
I
1 (�
ORDINANCE NO. A255
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, GRANTING TO SHELL PIPE LINE
CORPORATION A FRANCHISB FOR A PERIOD NOT TO
EXCEED TEN (10) YEARS TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN
TWO (2) PIPELINE SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF A
SINGLE LINE OF PIPE SIX (6) INCHES AND A
SINGLE LINE OF PIPE EIGHT (8) 1 IN
INTERNAL DIAMETER FOR THE PURPOSE OF
TRANSPORTING PETROLEW[ PRODUCTS WITHIN SAID
CITY.
WHEREAS, SHELL PIPE LINE CORPORATION ( "Shell "), filed an
application with the City of E1 Segundo, California for a franchise
to operate and maintain two (2) pipelines for the transportation of
petroleum products; and
WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution No. 3967, adopted
on the 2nd day of April 1996, declared its intention to grant said
pipeline franchise to Shell and did set May 21, 1996 as the date of
the public hearing thereon; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk did publish a notice of the
Public Hearing as directed by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on the 21st day of May 1996, said Public Hearing
was held and it was determined by the City Council to grant said
pipeline franchise to Shell.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL
SEGUNDO CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City hereby grants a non - exclusive
Franchise to Shell to operate and maintain a single line of pipe of
six (6) and single line of pipe eight (s) inches internal diameter
for the transportation of petroleum products by means of executing
the Franchise Agreement ( "Agreement" - Exhibit A).
SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute
this ordinance, the Agreement and the attendant Grant of Subsurface
Easement (Exhibit S) on behalf of the City.
SECTION 3. The Franchise granted by this ordinance
becomes effective after a duly authorized representative of Shell
executes the agreement and delivers it to the City Clerk.
Page 1 of 2
FWMAY -ZZ COD (Fnday 513/96 9M aro
1 2-55
A 03
SECTION 4. Upon Shell's delivery of the duly executed
agreement to the City Clerk, the City Clerk shall cause the Grant
of Subsurface Easement to be recorded in the Los Angeles County
Recorder's office.
SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective at
midnight on the thirtieth (30) day from and after the final passage
and adoption hereof.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this ordinance; mhall cause the same to be entered
in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a note
of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the meeting
at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall within 15 days
after the passage or adoption thereof cause the same to be
published or posted in accordance with the law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th
ATTESTED:
C1 y for n
C 4ky Cler (Seal)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
C ty Attorney
Page 2 of 2
day of June 1996.
Sandra Jacoba ayor
of the City o 1 Segundo,
California
PWMAY -MARD (Fn&y 5/3/% 900 w4
1455
1 � �t
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the whole number of members of the City Council of the said City is five,
that the foregoing ordinance, being ORDINANCE NO. 1255 is a full, true correct original
of ORDINANCE NO. 1255 of the said City of El Segundo, California, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, GRANTING TO SHELL PIPE LINE
CORPORATION A FRANCHISE FOR A PERIOD NOT TO
EXCEED TEN (10) YEARS TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN
TWO (2) PIPE=LINE SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF A SINGLE
LINE OF PIPE SIX (6) INCHES AND A SINGLE LINE OF
PIPE EIGHT (8) INCHES IN INTERNAL DIAMETER FOR
THE PURPOSE OF TRANSPORTING PETROLEUM
PRODUCTS WITHIN SAID CITY.
which was duly passed and adopted by the said City Council, approved and signed by
the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting
of the said Council held on the 4TH DAY OF JUNE . 1996, and the same was so
passed and adopted by the following vote
AYES' Mayor Jacobs, Councilwoman Friedkin and
Councilman Gordon
NOES None
ABSENT. Mayor ProTem Wemick and Councilman Weston
ABSTAINED: None
I do hereby further certify that pursuant to the provisions of Section 36933 of the
Government Code of the State of California, that the foregoing ORDINANCE NO. 1255,
was posted and /or published in the manner prescribed by law.
CIND C1T5= N'`�?E,�
City lark of the
City of El Segundo, California
(SEAL)
1 Z55
105
AX2 13MO S
PIPELINE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
(CCNZION CARRIER PIPELINES)
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, California, a general law city ( "City ") and
SHELL CALIFORNIA PIPELINE COMPANY, a California corporation
( "Grantee "), this 4th day of June 1996.
ZFWMTT?y
The parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION 1. NATURE OF FRANCHISE. City hereby grants a non-
exclusive Franchise ( "this Franchise ") to Grantee for the term of
ten (10) years from and after April 20, 1996 to lay and use
pipelines not to exceed eight (8) inches in nominal internal
diameter for transportation of oil, or products thereof, ( "the
products ") in, under, along and across the public streets, highways
and alleys (collectively "the Streets ") in City, particularly
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference. Grantee shall provide a minimum of thirty (30)
days prior written notice to the City Fire Department of any
changes to the type and nature of the oil, or products thereof, to
be transported in the pipelines under this Franchise Agreement.
This Franchise is hereby granted to Grantee and its lawful
successors and assigns subject to the terms hereof. This Franchise
shall include the right, for the period and subject to such terms,
to maintain, operate, repair and renew the pipeline system of
Grantee already laid out and constructed in the Streets as
previously authorized.
SECTION 2. APPURTENANCES. Grantee shall have the right,
subject to prior approval of the City Engineer, to construct and
maintain such traps, manholes, conduits, valves, appliances,
attachments and appurtenances (collectively "appurtenances ") as may
be necessary or convenient for proper maintenance and operation of
12-55
EXHIBIT " A "
0r)
the pipelines. Appurtenances shall be kept flush with the surface
of the Streets and located so as to conform to any requirement of
the City Engineer in regard thereto and not to interfere with the
use of the Streets. Grantee shall have the right, subject to such
ordinances, rules or regulations as are now or may hereafter be
enacted or in force, to make all necessary excavations in the
Streets for construction and repair of the pipelines and
appurtenances (collectively hereinafter "the Facilities ") subject
to prior approval of the City Engineer and acquisition by Grantee
of all necessary City permits. The City Engineer may impose
reasonable conditions on the excavation work.
SEr.TION 3. LOCATION OF THE FACILITIES. So far as is
practicable, the Facilities shall be located along the edge or
shoulder of the Streets or in parking areas adjacent thereto so as
to not unreasonably disturb the flow of traffic, and where possible
shall be laid in the unpaved porticns of the Streets, if any.
SECTION 4. CONSTRUCTION OF THE FACILITIES
The Facilities shall be installed, maintained and
inspected by Grantee in a satisfactory, safe, and workmanlike
manner, of good material, and in conformity with all ordinances,
rules or regulations now or hereafter adopted or prescribed by the
City Council or state or federal authorities. The Facilities shall
conform to applicable standards for pipelines imposed by the
California State Fire Marshal and any other applicable regulatory
authority, including but not limited to those standards under the
California Pipeline Safety Act of 1981 (Government Code 551010 et
seq.). The Facilities shall have cathodic protection, and a
description of all protective devices shall be furnished to the
City Engineer which will show the locations and types of anodes,
including a description of the methods used as protection against
corrosion and electrolytic leakage. The Facilities shall be
constructed in such a manner that sections thereof may be closed
off and isolated from the flow of product.
u xz 139M 5 z
1 Z-35
1 1
AX2 134M S
The work of laying constructing, maintaining, operating,
renewing, repairing, changing and moving any segments of the
Facilities, and all other work in exercise of the rights under this
Franchise, shall be conducted with the least practicable hindrance
or interference to use of the Streets by the public or City, and
Grantee shall provide all necessary warning, safety and traffic
control devices as are or may be required by City, county, state or
federal regulations. All excavations shall be back-filled and
adequately compacted. The surface of the Streets shall be placed
in as good and serviceable condition as existed before commencement
of the work and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Restoration of the Streets is to be completed in accordance with
plans approved by City.
If Grantee fails to restore the excavation to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, City or its agents may, at
City's sole discretion, restore the excavation site to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Grantee shall pay all costs
associated with such restoration of the excavation site within
thirty (30) days after receipt of City's itemized bill therefor.
SECTI N 5. COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANS. Grantee,
in good faith, shall commence the work of laying the Facilities
within six (6) months from the Effective Date of this Franchise,
and if such construction is not so commenced within such time, this
Franchise may be declared forfeited; provided, however, that if
Grantee is maintaining and operating an existing pipeline system in
the Streets, it shall be deemed to be in compliance with the
foregoing. Grantee shall not commence construction of the
Facilities or add to existing facilities comprising the Facilities,
if any, until it first shall have obtained City approval of
construction plans and specifications and all necessary permits
from City. The plans shall contain a construction schedule
detailing the time period during which certain portions of the
Streets will be excavated and the dates upon which the Streets
3
135
1 t3 8
shall be restored to their original condition.
The permit application of Grantee shall also contain the
following data: the length, approximate depth and proposed
location of the Facilities proposed to be laid or constructed, the
size and description of the pipe intended to be used, and such
other data as the City Engineer may reasonably require. Grantee
shall pay any and all reasonable inspection fees of City. Upon
completion of the construction Grantee shall render a statement to
City showing in detail the permits issued and the total length of
the Facilities constructed under such permits.
SECTION 6. DOCUMENTS TO BE FURNISHED
A. Maps
Within ninety (90) days following the execution of this
Agreement, Grantee shall file with City a map or maps, in such form
as may be required by the City Engineer, showing accurately the
locations and sizes of all of the Facilities currently in place,
and shall, upon installation of any additional facilities or upon
removal, change or abandonment of all or any portion thereof, file
with City a revised map or maps showing the locations and sizes of
all such additional and/or abandoned facilities as of that date.
B. Docents S bbmitted
Concurrently with the submission to any other
governmental agency of any report, document or writing (including
but not limited to reports of incidents and inspections, safety
reports, and permit applications or documents) concerning the
Facilities, Grantee shall submit true, complete and correct copies
thereof to the City Director of Public Works and City Fire Chief.
C. Documents Received
Within two (2) weeks of receiving any report, document or
other writing from any other governmental agency (including but not
limited to permits, approvals, notices of violations, actions,
inspection reports and incident reports) concerning the Facilities,
Grantee shall submit true, correct and complete copies thereof to
the City Director of Public Works and City Fire Chief.
-AM 139950 s q
1255
.j
I
SECTION 1. COMPENSATION TO THE CITY
A. &Wunt of Annual Franchise Fee
As consideration for the granting of this Franchise,
Grantee shall pay an annual Franchise Fee to City. The Franchise
Fee shall be paid annually to City in lawful money of the United
states within sixty (60) days after the end of each calendar year.
Any neglect, omission or refusal of Grantee to pay the Franchise
Fee or provide any information required under this Section at the
time or in the manner reasonably required shall constitute grounds
for declaration of a forfeiture of this Franchise and 'all rights
hereunder. Acceptance by City of any payment of the Franchise Fee
shall not be construed as a release, waiver, acquiescence or accord
and satisfaction of any claim City may have for further or
additional sums payable under this Franchise or for the performance
of any other obligation hereunder.
B. Base Rate
The base rate for the Franchise Fee shall be computed as
follows:
The length of the Facilities expressed in feet shall be
multiplied by the applicable base rate, as adjusted pursuant to
subparagraph C, in accordance witr the following schedule as set
forth in California Public Utilities Code 56231.5:
Pipe Size
(internal diameter in inches)
Base rate per lineal foot
0 - 4
0.0 8
6
0.132
8
0.176
10
0.220
12
0.264
14
1 0.308
16
0.352
18
0.396
0.440
0.484
24
0.528
6
0.572
8
0.616
30
0.660
wa.,ivaw 5 5
1 X55
11�
wo 13"So s
For pipelines with an internal diameter not listed above, the
Franchise Fee shall be in the same proportion to the above -
indicated "Base rate per lineal toot" of a 12- inch - diameter pipe as
the diameter of the unlisted pipe is to 12 inches.
The calculation of the Franchise Fee under this Subparagraph
B shall be subject to recalculation if the fee provisions of
California Public Utilities Code 56231.5 are amended.
MEN •.o • . e 3
Grantee shall be subject to the Franchise Fee for each
calendar year from the Effective Date of this Franchise, to and
including the date of either actual removal of the Facilities or
the date on which a properly approved abandonment ".in place"
becomes effective as authorized by City, and until Grantee shall
have fully complied with all provisions of this Franchise and all
other applicable provisions of law or ordinance relative to such
removal or abandonment. All such payments shall be made payable to
City, and shall be supported by Grantee's verified statements
concerning the computation of the amounts thereof.
Provided, however, that the amount of each payment of
the Franchise Fee shall be revised each calendar year as follows:
12. 53 5
(1) The amount of the payment shall be adjusted at
the time payment is due by multiplying the
aforesaid base rate by the Consumer Price
Index, All Urban Consumers for the Los
Angeles- Anaheim- Riverside Area as published by
the United States Department of Labor, Office
of Information, for the month of September
immediately preceding the month in which
payment is due and payable, and dividing by
the Consumer Price Index for June 30, 1989
which is declared to be 100.0. Under no
circumstances shall the multiplying factor be
less than one.
Ali
lAX2 1398505
(2) if the United States Department of Labor, Office of
Information discontinues preparation or publication
of the aforesaid Consumer Price Index for such
Area, and if no translation table prepared by the
Department of Labor is available so as to make
those statistics which are then available
applicable to the Index for June 30, 1989, City
shall prescribe a rate of payment which shall, in
its judgment, vary from the rates specified in this
Section in approximate proportion as, commodity
consumer prices then current vary from consumer
prices current in Lecember, 1988. On this point,
the City's reasonable determination shall be final
and conclusive.
(3) If said Office of Information shall revise
said Index, the parties hereto shall accept
the method of revision or conversion
recommended by said Office.
C. Administrative Fee for Processing this Franchise
In consideration for the granting of this Franchise, and
to reimburse City for its administrative expenses in preparing and
approving the documents for this Franchise, Grantee shall pay City
Two Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) within thirty (30)
days after the Effective Date of this Franchise.
SECTION 8, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
A. Spill Prevention and Response Planning
1. At all times during the term of this Franchise,
Grantee shall maintain :
a. An oil spill prevention and response Plan
consistent with and conforming to California Office of oil Spill
Prevention and Response Regulations (OSPR) at Title 14, Division 1,
Subdivision 4, Chapter 2, Subchapter 3, 55815 -817 of the California
Code;
7
1255
X12
b. A Business Plan pursuant to Chapter 6.95 of the
California Health and Safety Code;
C. A Chemical Inventory pursuant to Chapter 6.95
of the California Health & Safety Code;
d. Pipeline maps and diagrams, and a contingency
Plan for pipeline emergencies pursuant to California Government
Code 551015.
2. Grantee shall pay City all applicable fees for
review and approval of each such Plan for which City holds prime
jurisdiction.
3. Grantee shall also comply with any requirements for
Plans imposed by any federal, state or local authority during the
term of this Franchise.
4. Grantee shall offer to meet with the City Fire Chief
or Fire Chief's designee not less often than once each calendar
year to discuss and review Plans and response plans for pipeline
emergencies. All emergency response work performed by Grantee
shall be performed in accordance with the applicable Plans and in
cooperation with the City Fire Department.
B. operational Requirements
a. Grantee shall cause the Facilities to be secure
against unauthorized entry and tampering.
b. Remotely operable valves shall be provided
which will be capable of shutting off flow of product.
SECTION 9. OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR. Grantee
shall operate, maintain and repair the Facilities in accordance
with the California Pipeline Safety Act (Government Code 5551010-
51019), U.S. Department of Transportation Hazardous Liquid Pipeline
Regulations (49 C.F.R. Part AS) and any and all other applicable
federal and state rules. Grantee shall immediately make all repairs
to the Streets and City property made necessary by any of the
LAX2139g.5pL5 5 8
iI3
Ux2 J3W505
operations of Grantee, upon approval of plans by the City Engineer,
obtaining all necessary City permits. If Grantee fails to make
said repairs to the Streets or City property, Grantee shall pay to
City upon demand all costs which City incurs in making said
repairs.
SECTION 10. REARRANGEMENT OF FACILITIES
A. EX2ense of Grantee
1. If any portion(s) of the Facilities shall, in the
opinion of City, endanger the public in the use of the Streets or
interfere with or obstruct the use of any street by the public or
for public purpose, City shall have the right to require Grantee to
move, alter or relocate such portion(s) to avoid such danger,
interference or obstruction, in conformity with written notice from
the City Engineer, at Grantee's sole expense. In such an event,
City agrees to provide Grantee with a reasonable alternative
location to relocate such portion(s) of the Facilities so as to
provide an unbroken connection between the relocated portions and
the portions that remain in place.
2. whenever, during the term of this Franchise, City,
including any water, electric, gas or other utility system
hereafter owned or operated by City, any community facilities or
assessment district, or any other agency established by City in its
ministerial capacity, shall change the grade, width, alignment or
location of any street, way, alley or place, or improve any said
street in any manner, including but not limited to the laying of
any sewer, storm drain, conduits, gas, water or other pipes,
pedestrian tunnels, subway, viaduct or other work of City (the
right to do all of which is specifically reserved to City without
any admission on its part that it would not otherwise have such
rights), Grantee shall, at its own cost and expense, do any and all
things to effect such change in position or location of any
portion(s) of the Facilities in conformity with the written
approval of the City Engineer, including but not limited to removal
or relocation of any portion(s) of the Facilities, if and when made
necessary by the determination of the City Engineer.
Q6
114
B. Esnense of Others
1. City shall also have the right to require Grantee to
rearrange any part of the Facilities for the accommodation of any
private person, firm or corporation. When such rearrangement is
done for the accommodation of any private person, firm or
corporation, the cost of such rearrangement shall be borne by the
accommodated party. Such accommodated party, in advance of such
rearrangement, shall deposit with Grantee cash in an amount, as in
the reasonable discretion of Grantee, shall be required to pay the
costs of such rearrangement. -
2. The rearrangement referred to in subsection 1 of
subparagraph B of this Section shall be accomplished in conformity
with the written notice of the City Engineer and plans approved by
the City Engineer.
C. RearranMent of Other Facilities. Nothing
contained in this Franchise shall be construed to require City to
move, alter or relocate any of its facilities upon any of the
Streets, at its own expense, for the convenience, accommodation or
necessity of any other public entity, person, firm or corporation
now or hereafter owning a public utility system of any type or
nature, or to move, alter or relocate any part of its system upon
any of the Streets for the convenience, accommodation or necessity
of Grantee.
D. Notice. Grantee shall be given not less than
ninety (90) days written notice of any rearrangement of any
portion(s) of the Facilities which Grantee is required to make
under this Section. Such notice shall furnish final, approved
plans detailing the necessity for the rearrangement of such
portion(s) of the Facilities, specify in reasonable detail the work
to be done by Grantee, and shall specify the time that such work is
to be accomplished. In the event that City shall change the
provisions of any such notice given to Grantee, Grantee shall be
given an additional, reasonable period of time to accomplish such
work.
ux2 13"506 10
115
I
LAX2 139850.5
SECTION 11, REMOVAL OR ABANDONMENT OF FACILITIES. At the
time of non - renewal, revocation or termination of this Franchise or
the permanent discontinuance of use of the Facilities or any
portion thereof, Grantee shall, within thirty (30) days thereafter,
make a written application to the City Engineer to either: (1)
abandon all, or a portion, of the Facilities in place, or (2)
remove all, or a portion of the Facilities as the City Engineer, in
his or her reasonable discretion, shall consider to be appropriate.
Such application shall include a closure plan, which shall
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City's
Fire Chief that any regulated materials which have been stored or
transported in the Facilities or such portions(s) thereof have been
or will be transported, disposed of or reused in a manner
consistent with public health and safety, and shall describe the
portion(s) of the Facilities desired to be abandoned by reference
to the map or maps required by Section 6 hereof and shall also
describe with reasonable accuracy the relative physical condition
of such portion(s) of the Facilities. Thereupon, the City Engineer
and the Fire Chief shall determine whether any proposed abandonment
or removal maybe effected without detriment to the public interest
or under what conditions such proposed abandonment or removal may
be safely effected and shall notify Grantee, according to such
requirements as shall be specified in the City Engineer's and the
Fire Chief's order to either:
1. Remove all or a portion of the Facilities, or
2. Abandon in place all or a portion of the
Facilities, subject to reasonable conditions
imposed by the City Engineer, Fire Chief and the
City Attorney to protect public health, safety and
welfare, and to protect City against future
liability.
If any portion(s) of the Facilities to be abandoned in
place subject to the prescribed conditions shall not be abandoned
in accordance with all such conditions, the City Engineer may make
additional appropriate orders, including, as the City Engineer
11 +• c..r"i 7
1lV
deems desirable, an order that Grantee shall remove all such
portion(s) of the Facilities in accordance with applicable
requirements. If any portion(s) or all of the Facilities are
abandoned, all right, title and interest in those abandoned shall
remain with Grantee, and City shall not acquire any possessory,
equitable or other interest therein.
SECTION 12, COMPLETION OF WORK. In the event that
Grantee fails to commence any work or act and diligently proceed
therewith, or to complete any such act or work required of Grantee
by the terms of this Franchise within the time limits required
hereby, City may cause such act or work to be completed by City or,
at the election of City, by a private contractor. Grantee agrees
to pay City within thirty (30) days after delivery of an itemized
bill the cost of performing such act or work plus an amount equal
to fifteen percent (15 %) thereof for overhead. If Grantee is
dissatisfied with any decision made by the City Engineer hereunder
or the determination of the cost of any work performed by City
pursuant to this Franchise, it may petition the City Council to
review the same within ten (10) days after such decision or
determination is communicated to Grantee. The decision of the City
Council shall be final and conclusive.
SECTION 13, BOND. Grantee shall, within thirty (30) days
of the Effective Date of this Franchise, file with the City Clerk,
and yearly thereafter maintain in full force and effect, a bond in
favor of City in the penal sum of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars
($500,000.00) with a surety to be approved by the City Finance
Director, conditioned that Grantee shall truly observe, fulfill and
perform each and every term and condition of this Franchise, and in
the case of a breach of a condition of this Franchise and Grantee's
refusal to remedy such breach, at the discretion of the City
Council, the whole amount of the penal sum therein shall be paid to
City in addition to any damages recoverable by city from the
principal and sureties of the bond. If said bond is not so filed,
the award of this Franchise will be set aside and any money paid by
Grantee hereunder will be forfeited.
LA= 139M-5 12
1 ��5
iii
]AX213985U
whenever a bond is taken and deemed to be liquidated damages
for any breach of a term or condition of this Franchise not
remedied by Grantee, Grantee must immediately file another bond of
like amount and character, and if Grantee fails to do so within the
time set by the City Council, the Council may, by resolution,
declare this Franchise forfeited.
Nothing herein shall insulate Grantee from liability in excess
of the amount of said bond or shall be construed as a waiver by
city of any remedy at law against Grantee for any breach of the
terms and conditions of this Franchise, or for any damage, loss or
injuries suffered by City in case of any damage, loss or injury
suffered by any person, firm or corporation by reason of any work
done or any activity conducted by Grantee in the exercise of this
Franchise.
SECTION 14. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.
A. LiMbility insurance. The Grantee shall, prior to
the effective date of this Franchise, provide to the City a signed
certification acknowledging the Grantee is self- insured for
liability claims arising out of Grantee's use of this Franchise, in
lieu of a policy or policies of general liability insurance, in the
following amounts: comprehensive general liability insurance
endorsed for contractual, broad form property damage and personal
injury with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000.00
per occurrence; comprehensive auto liability endorsed for all owned
and non -owned vehicles with a combined single limit of not less
than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence; and hazardous materials and
hazardous waste discharge coverage in an amount of not less than
$1,000,000.00 per occurrence.
B. Workers' Compensation Insurance. Prior to the
Effective Date of this Franchise, Grantee shall file with City the
following signed certification:
"Grantee is aware of, and will comply with,
Section 3700 of the Labor Code, requiring
13
La
I ib
wo usaw.s
every employer to be insured against liability
for Workers' Compensation or to undertake
self- insurance before commencing any of the
work."
Grantee shall also comply with Section 3800 of the Labor Code by
securing, paying for and maintaining in full force and effect for
the duration of the term of this Franchise, complete Workers'
Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California, or
satisfactory evidence of self - insurance.
C. Additional Insured. City and its respective
elective and appointive officers, officials, employees and agents
shall be named as additional insureds on the liability policies
required under this Franchise. The coverage shall contain no
special limitation on the scope of protection afforded to City, its
officers, officials, employees and agents. For any claims related
to this Franchise, Grantee's insurance coverage shall be primary
insurance as respects City, its officers, officials, employees and
agents. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by City, its
officers, officials, employees or agents shall be excess to
Grantee's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
D. Insurance Certificates. Prior to the Effective Date
of this Franchise, Grantee shall file with City a certificate of
insurance evidencing coverage in the amounts specified in this
Section. Such certificate shall be subject to approval by City's
risk manager. Such certificate shall bear an endorsement providing
that the policy to which it relates shall not be terminated or
materially altered except after thirty (30) days prior notice to
City.
E. Termination for Lack of Reguired Insurance Coverage.
If Grantee for any reason fails to have in place at all times
during the term of this Franchise all required insurance coverage,
City may terminate this Franchise forthwith.
14
1255 110
,SECTION 15. INDEMNIFICATION BY GRANTEE. Grantee shall
indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless City, its elective and
appointive boards, officials, officers, employees, agents,
volunteers, assigns and any successor or successors to City's
interest from and against any and all claims, demands, losses,
defense costs, reasonable attorney fees, fines, penalties,
expenses, causes of action and judgments at law or in equity,
damages, losses or liability of any kind or nature, including but
not limited to personal injury or death or property damage, arising
out of Grantee's exercise of this Franchise or operation of the
Facilities, regardless whether any act or omission is authorized,
allowed or prohibited by this Franchise.
Additionally, Grantee shall indemnify, defend and hold
harmless City, its elective and appointive boards, officials,
officers, employees, agents, volunteers, assigns and any successor
or successors to City's interest from and against all claims,
demands, losses, defense costs, reasonable attorney fees, fines,
penalties, expenses, causes of action and judgments at law or in
equity, damages, losses or liability of any kind or nature,
including but not limited to personal injury or death or property
damage, and other expenses of any nature including but not limited
to all foreseeable and all unforeseeable consequential damages, and
the cost of any required or necessary repair, cleanup or
detoxification, or the preparation and implementation of any
response, remedial, removal, closure or other required plans
(regardless of whether undertaken due to government action) arising
out of or attributable to the presence, use, generation, storage,
transportation, release, or disposal of Hazardous Material arising
out of Grantee's exercise of this Franchise or the operation of the
Facilities, regardless of whether any act or omission is
authorized, allowed or prohibited by this Franchise. As used in
this Section, Hazardous Material means any substance, product,
waste or other material of any nature whatsoever which is or
becomes listed, regulated or addressed pursuant to: (1) the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
uxz 139M 5 15
1 45 7 �+
r11
4 4o
LAM 13MO 5
Act of 1980, 42 D.S.C. §9601, et seq. (CERCLA); the Hazardous
Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 51801, at seq.; the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 56901, et seq.;
the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. 52601, et seq.; the
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 51251, et seq.; the California Hazardous
waste Control Act, Health and Safety Code 525100, et seq.; the
California Hazardous Substance Account Act, Health and Safety Code
525330, at seq.; the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic
Enforcement Act, Health and Safety Code 525249.5, et seq.;
California Health and Safety Code 525280, et seq. (Underground
Storage of Hazardous Substances); the California Hazardous Waste
Management Act, Health and Safety Code 525170.1, et seq.;
California Health and Safety Code 525501, et seq. (Hazardous
Materials Response Plans and Inventory); or the Porter - Cologne
Water Quality Control Act, Water Code 513000, et seq., all as
amended; or (2) any other federal, state or local law regulating,
relating to, or imposing liability or standards of conduct
concerning any hazardous, toxic or dangerous waste, substance or
materials, as now is, or at any time hereafter may be, in effect;
or (3) any rule or regulation adopted or promulgated under or
pursuant to any of said laws.
If Grantee receives any notice, whether oral or written,
of any inquiry, test, investigation, enforcement proceeding,
environmental audit or the like regarding any Hazardous Material
relating to this Franchise or the Facilities, Grantee shall
immediately notify City in writing of such notice.
The liability of Grantee hereunder shall not be limited
to the insurance provisions of this Franchise. The
indemnification, legal defense and hold harmless provisions of this
Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this
Franchise or the abandonment of the Facilities authorized hereunder
and shall relate back to all periods of time in which Grantee
maintained pipelines in City pursuant to this Franchise or previous
franchises.
16
I
�. G35 121
LJC21YM505
The provisions of this Section are intended to operate as
an agreement pursuant to 5107(e) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 59607(e), and
California Health and Safety Code 525364, to insure, protect, hold
harmless and indemnify City from liability pursuant to such laws.
SECTION 16, LIQUIDATED DAMAGES.
A. City finds and Grange agrees that as of the time of
the execution of this Franchise it is impractical if not impossible
to reasonably ascertain the extent of damages which would be
incurred by City as a result of a material breach by Grantee of its
obligations under this Franchise. The factors relating to the
impracticability of ascertaining damages include, but are not
limited to, the facts that: (i) substantial damage can result to
members of the public when access to public rights of way are
impeded or prevented due to construction within said rights of way;
(ii) faulty or negligent repair or restoration of streets and
public rights of way excavated pursuant to this Franchise can
present particular danger to public health, safety and welfare;
(iii) failure to restore streets in a timely manner can exacerbate
all of the dangers and concerns outlined above; (iv) such breaches
can cause inconvenience, anxiety, frustration and deprivation to
individual members of the general public in subjective ways and in
varying degrees of intensity which are incapable of measurement in
precise monetary terms; (v) the monetary loss resulting from such
breaches is impossible to calculate in precise monetary terms; and
(vi) termination of this Franchise for such breaches, and other
remedies are, at best, a means of future correction and not
remedies which make the public whole for past breaches.
B. Accordingly, the City Council may, in its
discretion, assess liquidated damages not to exceed the sum of FIVE
HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00) per day, for each calendar day that
Grantee is in material breach of this Franchise. This provision
for liquidated damages shall not be deemed an exclusive remedy or
afford the exclusive procedure for remedying a material breach of
this Franchise.
17
12
uxx ,waso s
C. City finds, and Grantee acknowledges and agrees that
the above described liquidated damages provisions represent a
reasonable sum in light of all of the circumstances. Said
liquidated damages sums shall be applicable to each calendar day of
delay during which Grantee has been found by City to be in material
breach of this Franchise, following Grantee's receipt of
notification of such finding. Grantee shall pay any liquidated
damages assessed by City within twenty (20) working days after they
are assessed. If they are not paid within the twenty working day
period, City may, in addition to any other remedies, ,order the
termination of this Franchise.
D. Grantee specifically agrees that failure to complete
any portion of construction work or restoration of streets in
accordance with the schedule set forth in the approved plans shall
constitute a material breach of this Franchise for purposes of this
Section, unless such failure is caused by conditions or actions not
under Grantee's control.
E. Both parties acknowledge and agree to the liquidated
damages provisions of this Section as evidenced by their signatures
below:
"Grantee"
SHELL CALIFORNIA PIPELINE COMPANY
by: Jd— (1- RC
Name typed oY prl &ted:
Ohl 2. Z R OA Sa r.7
Title: R-F+,c j� FAc1.
"City"
SECTION 17. ASSIGNMENT
A. Grantee shall not transfer, sell, hypothecate,
sublet or assign this Franchise, nor shall any of the rights or
privileges herein be hypothecated, leased, assigned, sold or
transferred, either in whole or in part, nor shall title thereto,
m
X55 ��3
INC2 139850 5
either legal or equitable, or any right, interest or property
herein, pass to or vest in any person, except Grantee, its
affiliates or subsidiaries, either by act of Grantee or by
operation of law, without the prior consent of City expressed by
resolution. The aforesaid provisions of this Section shall not
prohibit Grantee from using the Facilities for the purpose of
transporting for other persons the products, but in such event
Grantee shall be responsible to City for full performance and
observance of the terms and conditions of this Franchise.
B. Any sale, lease or assignment of this Franchise or
the rights and privileges granted hereby, or any of them, except to
Grantee, its affiliates or subsidiaries, without the prior written
consent of the City Council shall be null and void.
C. City shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to
a transfer of this Franchise. For the purpose of determining
whether it shall consent to such change, transfer or change in
control, City may inquire into the qualifications of the
prospective transferee or controlling party, and Grantee shall
assist City in any such inquiry. In seeking City's consent to any
change of ownership or control, Grantee shall have the
responsibility of ensuring that transferee completes an application
in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to City. An
application shall be submitted to City not less than ninety (90)
day& prior to the date of transfer. Grantee shall be required to
establish that it is in material compliance with this Franchise.
The transferee shall be required to establish that it possesses the
qualifications and financial and technical capability to operate
and maintain the Facilities and comply with all Franchise
requirements for the remainder of the term of this Franchise. If
City finds that the legal, financial, technical and other public
interest qualities of the applicant are satisfactory, and that the
proposed transferee has the capability to operate and maintain the
Facilities and comply with requirements of this Franchise for the
remaining term hereof, City shall consent to the transfer and
19
. L55
124
assignment of the rights and obligations of this Franchise. City
may condition the transfer to ensure that the transferee is and
remains in material compliance with this Franchise.
D. City consent pursuant to this Section is further
required for any change in control of Grantee. "Change in control"
shall mean any sale, transfer or acquisition of Grantee, Grantee's
parent, the parent of Grantee's parent, etc. if Grantee or its
parent(s) is /are a corporation or corporations, any acquisition of
more than ten percent (10%) of Grantee's voting stock by a person
or group of persons acting in concert, who already own less than
50% of the voting stock, shall be deemed a change in control.
E. Notwithstanding the above, Grantee shall be entitled
to pledge, encumber, or grant any security interest in this
Franchise, provided that Grantee shall first notify and obtain City
consent in writing of such proposed transaction. City shall
consent to such transaction, subject, however, to the following
conditions:
1. Any consent so granted shall not be deemed a consent
to such pledgee, encumbrancer, or secured party to exercise any
rights or prerogatives of Grantee under this Franchise, nor to its
exercise of any rights or prerogatives as a holder of an ownership
interest in this Franchise.
2. Any consent so granted shall not be deemed a consent
to any subsequent transfer or assignment as referred to in this
Section. Any such subsequent transfer or assignment shall be
deemed assignment of this Franchise within the meaning of this
Section, and shall be subject to the provisions of this section.
3. The pledgee, encumbrancer, or secured party shall
have executed and delivered to City an instrument in writing
agreeing to be bound by the provisions of this Franchise.
uxz 13w~w L
i
125
VJC2.13MO 5
SECTION 18. RECEIVERSHIP AND FORECLOSURE
A. Subject to applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy
Code, this Franchise shall, at the option of City, cease and
terminate one hundred twenty (120) days after appointment of a
receiver or trustee to take over and conduct the business of
Grantee whether in a receivership, reorganization, bankruptcy or
other action or proceeding unless such receivership or trusteeship
shall have been vacated prior to the expiration of said one hundred
twenty (120) days, or unless:
1. Such receiver or t:astee shall have, within one
hundred twenty (120) days after its election or appointment, fully
complied with all terms of this Franchise and remedied all breaches
of this Franchise or provided a plan for the remedy of such
breaches which is satisfactory to City; and
2. Such receiver or trustee shall, within said one
hundred twenty (120) days, execute an agreement duly approved by
the court having jurisdiction, whereby such receiver or trustee
assumes and agrees to be bound by each and every term, provision
and limitation of this Franchise.
B. Upon the foreclosure or other judicial sale of all
or a substantial part of the Facilities, Grantee shall notify the
City Clerk of such fact, and such notification shall be treated as
a notification that a change in ownership of Grantee has taken
place and that the provisions of this Franchise governing such
changes shall apply.
SECTION 19. WAIVER OF BREACH. No waiver of the breach of
any of the covenants, agreements, restrictions or conditions of
this Franchise by City shall be construed to be a waiver of any
succeeding breach of the same or other covenants, agreements,
restrictions or conditions of this Franchise. No delay or omission
of City in exercising any right, power or remedy herein provided in
the event of default shall be construed as a waiver thereof, or
21
126
LAU 139M5
acquiescence therein, nor shall the acceptance of any payments made
in a manner or at a time other than is herein provided be construed
as a waiver of or variation in any of the terms of this Franchise.
SECTION 20. DEFAULT
A. Default
In any event that Grantee shall default in the
performance of any of the terms, covenants and conditions of this
Franchise, the City Manager may give written notice to Grantee of
such default. In the event that Grantee does not commence the work
necessary to cure such default within thirty (30) days after such
notice is received or prosecute such work diligently to completion,
the City Council may declare this Franchise forfeited by giving
written notice thereof to Grantee, whereupon this Franchise shall
be void and the rights of Grantee hereunder shall terminate and
Grantee shall execute an instrument &urrendering this Franchise and
deliver same to City.
If the City Council declares this Franchise forfeited, it
may thereupon and thereafter exclude Grantee from further occupancy
or use of all City streets for the purposes authorized under this
Franchise. Forfeiture of this Franchise shall not of itself
operate to release the bond filed for this Franchise. Upon
declaring this Franchise forfeited, the City Council may elect to
take and accept the bond as liquidated damages therefor and pursue
any other legal remedy for any damage, loss or injury suffered by
City as a result of such breach. After forfeiture, the bond shall
remain in full force and effect for a period of one (1) year unless
exonerated by the City Council. No bond shall be exonerated unless
a release is obtained from the City Engineer and is filed with the
City Clerk. The release shall state whether all excavations have
been backfilled, all obstructions removed, and whether the
substrata or surfaces of the Streets have been placed in good and
serviceable condition. A release shall not constitute a waiver of
22
+' r•1 5 127
1N(213%50 5
any right or remedy which City may have against Grantee or any
person, firm or corporation for any damage, loss or injury suffered
by City as a result of any work or activity performed by Grantee in
the exercise of this Franchise.
B. cumulative Remedies
No provision herein made for the purpose of securing
enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Franchise shall be
deemed an exclusive remedy or to afford the exclusive procedure for
enforcement of said terms and conditions, but the remedy and
procedure herein provided, in addition to those provided by law,
shall be deemed cumulative.
SECTION 21, SCOPE OF RESERVATION. Nothing herein contained
shall ever be construed so as to exempt Grantee from compliance
with all ordinances of City now in effect or which may be hereafter
which are not inconsistent with the terms of this Franchise. The
enumeration herein of specific rights reserved shall not be
construed as exclusive, or as limiting the general reservation
herein made or as limiting such rights as City may have or
hereafter have in law.
SECTION 22. NOTICE. Any notice required to be given under
the terms of this Franchise, the manner of service of which is not
specifically provided for, may be served personally or by
depositing same with First Class postage prepaid in the United
States Mail addressed as follows:
To City:
Director of Public works
City of E1 Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, California 94250
To Grantee:
Shell California Pipeline Company
ATTN Manager, West Coast Area
Shell Pipe Line Corporation
Box 4848
Anaheim, California 92803 -4848
1 �. O
IAX2 1398505
Or such other address as may from time to time be furnished in
writing by one party to the other.
When service of any such notice is made by mail, the time
of such notice shall begin within and run from three days after the
date of the deposit of the same in the United States Mail.
SECTION 23, SUCCESSORS. The terms of this Franchise shall
inure to the benefit of and shall bind, as the case may be, the
successors and assigns of the parties hereto, subject, however, to
the provisions of Section 17 hereof.
SECTION 24. INTERPRETATION. This Franchise is granted upon
each and every condition herein contained, and shall be strictly
construed against Grantee. Nothing shall pass to Grantee by this
Franchise unless it be granted in plain and unambiguous terms.
Each of said conditions is a material and essential condition to
the granting of this Franchise. This Franchise shall be
interpreted and construed according to the laws of the State of
California.
SECTION 25. ATTORNEYS' FEES if litigation is reasonably
required to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Franchise,
the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to an
award of reasonable attorneys' fees, in addition to any other
relief to which it may be entitled.
SECTION 26. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Franchise contains the
entire understanding between City and Grantee. Any prior
agreements, promises, negotiations or representations not expressly
set forth herein are of no force or effect. Subsequent
modifications to this Franchise shall be effective only if in
writing and signed by all parties. It any term, condition or
covenant of this Franchise is held by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining
provisions of this Franchise shall be valid and binding.
24
1�:�
SECTION 27. PUBLICATION EXPENSE. Grantee shall pay to City
a sum of money sufficient to reimburse City for all publication
expenses incurred in connection with the granting of this
Franchise, said payment to be made within thirty (30) days after
City shall have furnished Grantee a written statement of such
expenses. Such sum is in addition to the Administrative Fee
indicated in subsection C of Section 7 hereof.
SECTION 28. EFFECTIVE DATE OF FRANCHISE. This Franchise
shall not be in effect unless and until the ordinance of the City
Council granting this Franchise is in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Franchise to be executed by their authorized representatives as of
the Effective Date hereof
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
( "City"
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Nam
type or printed:
C TY ERR
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Name typed or printed: 01
F24 T9 14t, I_� h'
CITY ATTORNEY
IAX2 139830 s 'u
SHELL CALIFORNIA
PIPELINE COMPANY
("Grantee")
by: //W,
Name tytVed printed:
W 3, 3AC-KS yj
Title: tin FAC.1
i 4•.I ./
A iJ
B
"
�
®
§
8
§
�
■�
22
0
7K)
K]
k
_,a
�
u -■
�
A.
«ao;
.-
;q-
�
o3�e2
§
s
k
f
ƒaa
\
41
0
O§ƒ
$
\
I
_
�
�&
RE
■
g§
(
k
§f
§
\�
@
%!_
(
EXHIBIT "A"
J }
.
A2
! OF 6
131
SHELL CALIFORNIA PIPELINE COMPANY
6-INCH DIAMETER VENTURA PRODUCTS PIPELINE
IN CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A portion of A 6-inch diameter pipeline,
1. entering the jurisdiction of said City in Aviation Boulevard at a point on the common
City of El Segundo /City of Hawthorne boundary line, said point being on the
southeasterly property line of a railroad right of way, approximately 16 feet east of the
centerline of Aviation Boulevard and 926 feet north of a prolongation of the centerline of
a street designated Utah Avenue in the City of El Segundo and 135th Street in the City of
Hawthorne,
thence northerly in Aviation Boulevard approximately 2,946 feet following the
meandenngs thereof, in an alignment vary;rg from approximately 16 feet to 18 feet
east of the centerline thereof, to a point on the common City of El Segundo /County of
Los Angeles boundary line, said point being approximately 17 feet east of and 112 feet
south of the intersection of the centerline of Aviation Boulevard with a prolongation of
the centerline of 124th Street, exiting the City of El Segundo and entering County of
Los Angeles jurisdiction;
3. thence north in County of Los Angeles jurisdiction 1,323.5 feet to a point, said point
being approximately 18 feet east of the intersection of the centerline of Aviation
Boulevard with a prolongation of the centerline of 120th Street, re- entering City of El
Segundo jurisdiction,
4 thence north in Aviation Boulevard 463 feet to a point, said point being approximately
18 feet east of the centerline of Aviation Boulevard and approximately 202 feet south of
the centerline of 1 19th Street, where the pipeline exits the City of El Segundo and enters
County of Los Angeles jurisdiction
482desc2.doc
EXHIBIT "A"
PAGE 2 OF 6 3 15 J.
a
u
4
A.
A
2 y
V
F
y
C
a.
a
y
H
V
G: oaV
�a
C
V 0 .c
L 0E: V
h
O W N Q
g
w c UL'
Vf
H$ v"i NT VP,N
4
P
F
fG
00
y
via
d
G
W
Uu
O
J.
-55
� +D
h oo ae m e�e� roma� ao are P P
�< $t t I I Ott �p <
3 z3z BI: zzzz $ �
z Gf
O N O p N. �-p -� 4* 1 V� N ♦m a pr,
i t + + 4 + + T ! + + i
r. N M„ m- Vml b b r z m
r m
m m -m am- m m m m m m P
A
H
V
Vf
H$ v"i NT VP,N
�:
P
y W Vl W by hvi
y�.
Li
via
Pi
� +D
h oo ae m e�e� roma� ao are P P
�< $t t I I Ott �p <
3 z3z BI: zzzz $ �
z Gf
O N O p N. �-p -� 4* 1 V� N ♦m a pr,
i t + + 4 + + T ! + + i
r. N M„ m- Vml b b r z m
r m
m m -m am- m m m m m m P
M m
'Yea• 61 i .7 i , I
r C
FQQ
�O
d 0 4 0
� Fad
Uv+�
y6
-�
EXHIBIT "A"
U PAGE 3 OF 6
C
m
a
i:,3
A
H
V
y W Vl W by hvi
y�.
Li
via
Pi
M m
'Yea• 61 i .7 i , I
r C
FQQ
�O
d 0 4 0
� Fad
Uv+�
y6
-�
EXHIBIT "A"
U PAGE 3 OF 6
C
m
a
i:,3
26 thence northwesterly in Walnut Avenue approximately 75 feet,
27. thence west in Walnut Avenue, approximately 158 feet,
28 thence north, perpendicular to the sidelines of Walnut Avenue approximately 5 feet to the
north right of way line thereof and to privately owned land,
29 thence north in privately owned land approximately 415 feet,
30 thence northwesterly in privately owned land approximately 3 feet to a point on the east
right of way line of a northisouth alley 20 feet wide,
31 thence continuing northwesterly in said alley approximately 20 feet to a point, said point
being 6 5 feet east of the west right of way line of said alley and opposite the cast
terminus of an alley 20 feet wide extending west from said north/south alley,
32. thence north in said northisouth alley approximately 190 feet to a point on the south right
of way line of Imperial Avenue, said point being approximately 645 feet east of the
centerline of California Street,
33 thence north in Imperial Avenue approximately 55 feet to a point 25.1 feet north of the
centerline thereof,
34. thence west in Imperial Avenue 5,903.2 feet to a point, said point being approximately 5
feet south of the north right of way line of Imperial Avenue and 110 feet east of a
prolongation of the centerline of Virginia Street,
35 thence north in Imperial Avenue perpendicular to the sidelines thereof approximately 5
feet to a point on the north right of way line thereof
36 The pipeline then enters a median owned by the City of El Segundo and continues
northerly therein approximately 91 feet at which point it exits the City of El Segundo.
482desc i.doc
EXHIBIT "A" r,
PAGE 6 OF 6 i �• >�
134
SHELL CALIFORNIA PIPELINE COMPANY
POWER OF ATTORNEY
SHELL CALIFORNIA PIPELINE COMPANY, a California corporation, with
offices at Two Shell Plaza, 777 Walker Street, in Houston, Texas 77252
( "SCPC "), hereby appoints and authorizes R. G. Ryman, J. A. Davis, or W. J.
Jackson, its Agents and Attorneys in Fact, in SCPC name and behalf, to execute
and deliver, accept, assign, amend, extend, terminate or release the following
instruments and documents in the usual course of SCPC business relating to its
pipelines and appurtenant facilities:
(a) deeds, leases, subleases, easements, rights of way, licenses,
permits, franchises, consents and other agreements for use of real property,
whether or not to SCPC; and
(b) applications for any of the foregoing relating to lands, waters
or other property owned by or under the jurisdiction of any government or
governmental authority, as well as any other applications or reports or
statements (excepting tax reports or returns) required by any government or
governmental authority;
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Corporation has caused this Power of Attorney
to be signed by its President (duly authorized by resolution adopted by the
Board of Directors on November 25, 1985) and attested by its Secretary.
EXECUTED this 25th day of May , 1989.
AT'.CST: SHELL CALIFORNIA PTPEE1*E,COMPAh
`L
W-6K JdAson, Secretary
STATE OF TEXAS )
SS.
COUNTY OF HARRIS )
Ki's..instrument was acknowledged before me on Ma 25
19 4�y�by��dsfD. Jasperson on behalf of Shell a i ornia ipe ine
a corporation.
OA
At O f,L4
• %ilillt�
�yy i'e,' . ... ••pe
Notary Public
-- ` 4PRM89SCPC.01 1355
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
City of E1 Segundo
City Clerk
350 Main Street
E1 Segundo, CA 90245
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City of E1 Segundo
City Clerk
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
WHEREAS, on July 20, 1959, the City of Los Angeles
conveyed to the City of E1 Segundo certain real property
described in that certain Grant Deed recorded in Book D561 at
Page 787 through 790 of official records of the County of Los
Angeles; and
WHEREAS, said Deed imposed certain restrictions upon
the use of said property by the Citv of E1 Segundo; and
entitled:
WHEREAS, on April 16, 1970, Ordinance No. 140,297
"AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PRESIDENT OR TWO MEMBERS
OF THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS TO EXECUTE A CONSENT TO
THE GRANTING OF CERTAIN SUBSURFACE PIPE LINE EASEMENTS
BY THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO; ",
was passed by the Los Angeles City Council on April 16, 1970,
approved by the Mayor of Los Angeles on April 20, 1970, and will
become effective on May 31, 1970; and
WHEREAS, by said ordinance the City of Los Angeles
consents to the granting of subsurface easements by the City of
E1 Segundo for pipeline purposes in, under, through, and across,
that certain parcel of real property conveyed by the City of Los
Angeles to the City of E1 Segundo by Grant Deed recorded August
5, 1959, in Book D561 at Page 787 through 790 of official records
of Los Angeles County, and further authorized the President of,
or two members of, the Board of Public Works of the City of Los
Angeles to execute the consent to grant said subsurface easements
and the City Clerk to attest thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal
corporation, does hereby grant to Shell California Pipeline
Company, a California Corporation, a corporation (Grantee), a
subsurface easement for a period commencing with the approval of
this Grant of Subsurface Easement, ending on the 22nd day of
April, 2006, for the purpose of maintaining and operating one
pipeline not exceeding eight (8) inches internal diameter for the
purpose of transporting aviation jet fuel over, across and along
the following described real property:
EXHIBIT "B"
?W -MAY21 Ens (Wednesday 5/2296 11 00 am)
136
A strip of land 10.00 feet in width the center line of
which is described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the north line of imperial
Avenue (60 feet wide) 109.00 feet easterly of the center line of
Virginia Street (50 feet wide); THENCE northerly 111.00 feet to
the north city boundary.
The City of E1 Segundo is to fully use and enjoy the
premises except for the purpose granted to the Grantee.
Grantee hereby agrees to maintain all pipes a
sufficient depth so as not to interfere with the use of the
property by the City of El Segundo, and to pay any damages which
may arise as a result of its use.
This grant of subsurface easement is not intended to
and shall not be construed to permit the exercise of any rights
which would cause a reversion of said premises to the City of Los
Angeles, or to its successors or assigns.
This Grant of Subsurface Easement will be of no virtue,
force, or effect, except to the extent the same is consented to
by the City of Los Angeles, pursuant to the authorization of the
said ordinance No. 140,297.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said City of E1 Segundo has
hereunto caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto
subscribed and affixed by its proper officers first thersunto
duly authorized.
APPROVED this 4th day of Jump , 1996
ATTESTED:
ndy No a en
,City Clerk (Seal)
APPROVED TO POM:
City Attmrney
andra Jacobs, or
of the City o Segundo,
California
PW- MAYXZAS (Ftldq 3/3/96 9.OD AM
13 7
SHELL OIL COMPANY
$-INCH DIAMETER CARSON PLANT #6 (LAX PRODUCTS) PIPELINE
IN CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A portion of an 8-inch diameter pipeline,
1. entering the jurisdiction of said City at the common City of El Segundo/City of
Hawthorne boundary line on the centerline of Aviation Boulevard at a point
approximately 270 feet north of the centerline of Roseerarts Avenue;
2. thence northwesterly in Aviation Boulevard approximately 50 fed to a point on the west
right of way line thereof, said point being approximately 310 fed north of the centerline
of Rosecrans Avenue;
3. thence generally northwesterly in privately owned land various courses and distances
totaling approximately 7,243 linear fed to a point on the south right of way line of El
Segundo Boulevard, said point being approximately 185 fed cast of the centerline of
Sepulveda Boulevard,
4. thence northwesterly across El Segundo Boulevard 154 fed to a point on the north right
of way line thereof, said point being approximately 100 fed east of the centerline of
Sepulveda Boulevard.
5. At this point the pipeline enters privately owned land and proceeds generally
northnorthwesterly therein various courses and distances totaling approximately 190
linear feet to a point on the east right of way line of Sepulveda Boulevard, said point
being approximately 200 fed north of the north right of way line of El Segundo
Boulevard;
6. thence west across Sepulveda Boulevard perpendicular to the sidelines thereof 100 feet;
thence in privately owned land northwesterly approximately 1,016 feet to a point on the
south right of way line of Grand Avenue, said point being approximately 190 feet east of
a prolongation of the centerline of Illinois Street;
thence north across Grand Avenue perpendicular to the sidelines thereof 60 feet to
privately owned land;
9 thence north in privately owned land 36.6 teen
10 thence northwesterly in privately owned land 473.3 feet to a point on the east right of
way line of Illinois Street, said point being approximately 288 feet north of the north
right of way line of Grand Avenue;
482descl.doc
EXHIBIT "A" i 5
PAGE 4 OF 6 1 `�
I1. thence west across Illinois Street perpendicular to the sidelines thereof 50 feet to
privately owned land,
12 thence west in privately owned land 63.3 feet;
13. thence northwesterly in privately owned land 150 feet,
14, thence northerly in privately owned land approximately 1,036 feet to a point on the south
right of way line of Mariposa Avenue, said point being approximately 143 feet west of
the centerline of Illinois Street;
15 thence north across Marposa Avenue perpendicular to the sidelines thereof 50 feet to
privately owned land east of Washington Street,
16 thence north in privately owned land approximately 139 feet;
17, thence northwesterly in privately owned land approximately 28 feet,
18 thence north in privately owned land approximately 326 feet to a point on the south right
of way line of Palm Avenue, said point being approximately 30 feet east of the centerline
of Washington Street,
19. thence across Palm Avenue perpendicular to the sidelines thereof 40 feet to privately
owned land east of Washington Street,
20 thence north in privately owned land approximately 656 feet to a point on the south right
of way line of Maple Avenue, said point being approximately 30 feet east of the
centerline of Washington Street,
21. thence across Maple Avenue perpendicular to the sidelines thereof 50 feet to privately
owned land east of Washington Street,
22 thence north in privately owned land approximately 322 feet to a point on the south right
of way line of Sycamore Avenue, said point being approximately 30 feet east of the
centerline of Washington Street,
23 thence across Sycamore Avenue perpendicular to the sidelines thereof 50 feet to
privately owned land cast of Washington Street;
24, thence north to privately owned land approximately 314 feet to a point on the south right
of way line of Walnut Avenue, said point being approximately 25 feet east of the
centerline of Washington Street,
25 thence north in Walnut Avenue approximately 15 feet,
482descl.doc
2 �
EXHIBIT "A"
PAGE 5 of 6
i3r�
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 21, 2006
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING- Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action on the Police Department utilizing up to $72,000 of existing
Citizens Option for Public Safety (COPS) grant funds to operate on an overtime basis, special
law enforcement details during the calendar year Additionally, purchase supplemental fitness
(1) Approve the use of COPS grant funds for special law enforcement details and the
purchase of gym equipment, 2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION.
During the 1996 legislative session, the state government adopted legislation to provide block
grant money for law enforcement purposes This is known as the Citizens Option for Public
Safety (COPS) grant Specific to the grant guidelines are that the funds be utilized for "front
line law enforcement' and that they be used to supplement existing programs
In February, 2005, the City Council approved a request by the Chief of Police to utilize up to
$50,000 of the existing COPS grant funds to staff, on an overtime basis, Specialized Law
Enforcement Details These enforcement teams, during calendar year 2005, addressed and
impacted crimes such as auto theft /burglary, robbery, "tagging ", and Driving Under the
Influence (DUI) Of particular note, officers working DUI enforcement made in excess of 100
arrests during the time frame Of the requested $50,000, approximately $30,000 was utilized
It is proposed that similar details will be funded, up to $40,000, during CY 2006 (cont )
ATT
Vendor Quotes
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget. $300,000.00
Amount Requested- $72,000
Account Number. 120 -400- 000 -8104
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required. _Yes X No
WORID BY: DATE. March 13, 2006
, C ie of Police
DATE: 3/1f
City Manager
13
I
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION' (Continued)
In 1999, the Police Department utilized approximately $32,000 from the asset forfeiture
account to remodel, expand, and equip the gym The aerobic equipment purchased in 1999 is
in need of replacement due to age and deterioration Modern equipment also contains
elements that provide additional safety and fitness features not available on older machines
It is proposed that the new equipment be of "commercial grade" in that this is identical to what
is utilized in fitness centers similar to the Spectrum Club, Bally's, and 24 Hour Fitness A
review of equipment best suited for the Police Department gym revealed that Life Fitness
manufactures a high quality product that is used throughout the fitness industry The individual
pieces of equipment were identified and three vendor quotes were obtained It is proposed
that the vendor with the lowest bid, LA Gym Equipment be selected The requested amount of
$32,000 includes a 10% contingency buffer
lrai
cG
r=
Commercial Consultant Rick Moser
QUOTE #1
(800)783 -7621 ext 21
Fax (818)232 -4111
Quote# 9233 -3
Sls# 86385
Date 12/8/2005
SOLD TO
SHIP TO
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPT
Price
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPT
348 MAIN STREET
r�
348 MAIN STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
$2,09841
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
ROGER STEPHENSON (310) 524 -2268
1
ROGER STEPHENSON (310) 524 -2268
MITCH TAVERA (310) 345 -0223
MITCH TAVERA (310) 345 -0223
rstephenson @elseg undo org
rstephenson @elsegundo ding
Item#
Description
Qty
Price
Extension
$24,96480
r�
$2,059 60
Freight
$2,09841
1
LIFE FITNESS 95Ci UPRIGHT BIKE
1
$1 949 35
$1,949 35
Model LIF- LC- 95CI -UP -BIKE LA Gym ID 320112
INK
2
LIFE FITNESS 95RI RECUMBENT BIKE -
2
$2,014 35
$4 028 70
Model LIF -LC -95RI LA Gym ID 340026
.A►
3
LIFE FITNESS 95TI TREADMILL
2
$4,549 35
$9,098 70
Model LIF -TR- 95TI -TREAD LA Gym ID 220163 VL
q
LIFE FITNESS 95x1 ELLIPTICAL CROSSTRAINER
2
$3 119 35
$6,238 70
Model LIF CT -95XI LA Gym ID 440076
5
LIFE FITNESS 95Si STAIRCLIMBER
1
$1,949 35
$1 949 35
Model LIF -SC -95S( LA Gym ID 420067
ppyyrres�
ECtARN M
6
WATERROWER # S4 -S1 STAINLESS STEEL INDOOR ROWER
1
$1,700 00
$1 700 00
Model MSC -N -ST LA Gym ID 1893
Desired Delivery Date
Estimated Lead Time
Flame Color
Upholstei y Coloi
Comments
GOLD'S GYM DISCOUNT - 35% OFF LIFE FITNESS
PRICING INCLUDES INSTALLATION
Customer Appi oval Signatuie Date
Taxable Extension Total
$24,96480
Delivery /Assembly
$000
Taxable Sub Total
$24,96480
Tax 825%
$2,059 60
Freight
$2,09841
TOTAL $29,122 81
p
itlti
QUOTE #2
NATIONAL ACCOUNTS EQUIPMENT PROPOSAL
x -
Proposal Number MB1214054
Date
14- Dec -05
Phone
253 - 946 -4225
From
IMarc Berry - National Accounts
Fax
253- 946 -4318
348 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Roger Stephenson - 310 524 2268
Mitch Tavera - 310 345 0223
348 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Roger Stephenson - 310 524 2268
Mitch Tavera - 310 345 0223
Item
Product
Description
Qty
3 -5 weeks
Your
Price
Extended
Price
950
Life Fitness Upright Bike
1
$2,999
$2,999
95Rt
Life Fitness Recumbent Bike
2
3,099
6,198
95Ti
Life Fitness Treadmill
2
6,999
13,998
95Xi
Life Fitness Elliptical Trainer
2
4,799
9,598
95Si
Life Fitness Stair Climber
1
2,999
2,999
S4S1
Water Rower
1
2,000
2,000
0
l YJ
Notes
Lead Time
3 -5 weeks
Valid For
45 days
Payment Terms
Net 30 w /credit application
Package Sub Total
Shipping /Installation
Sales Tax @ 8 25%
Total
Applicable state sales tax will be added to all invoices at the time of billing
Please sign and date the proposal to accept the terms and activate the order
Signature Date
IMMMiER
TIMI-inj afj
LrfeFitness
5100 North River Road
Schiller Park, IL 60176
1 -847- 288 -3676
$ 37,792 00
$ 37,792 00
$ 2,17500
$ 3,11784
$43,08484
A
i 14'1
advanced ROM
w -
9500 W 49th Ave, D -100
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Ph 800 -520 -1112 Fax 303 - 996 -0063
Bill To
El Segundo Police Dept
348 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Roger Stephenson 310 -524
Mitch Tavera 310 - 345 -0223
rstepenson @elsegundo org
QUOTE #3
Commercial Sales Quotation
Ship To
El Segundo Police Dept
348 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Roger Stephenson 310 -524
Mitch Tavera 310 - 345 -0223
rstepenson @elsegundo org
y ,
Date 12/11/2005
Quote Expires 1/10/2006
Quote Number 000257
Questions Please call
Bob Dicandia
602 -550 -5032
Part #
Mfg. Model#
Mfr
Description
Price
Qty
Extend
$37,037.38
PROPOSAL
2070071
95Ci
LIF
LF 95Ci Lifecycle Upright Exercise Bike
$2.54900
1
$2,549 OO
2050040
95Ri
LIF
LF 95Ri Lifecycle Recumbent Exercise
$2,63400
2
$5,268 00
Bike
2065083
95Ti
LIF
LF 95Ti Treadmill w/ 4 In p AC & Lifepulse
$5,94900
2
$11,89800
2015045
95X1
LIF
LF 95Xi FltStnde CrossTramer W/ HR
$4,07900
2
$8,15800
2060035
95Si
LIF
LF 95Si Stairclimber
$2,54900
1
$2,54900
2035022
FDR -B
HCI
Health Care International Commercial
$1,82500
1
$1,82500
Fluid Rower- Black
i
1 accept the terms and conditions of this quotation
Signed
Name Title
Terms* 50% down 50% upon delivery- or approved PO
Date Equipment Requested / /
• Special Orders Require a 50% Non - refundable deposit
• Returned Commercial Items are subject to a 25% restocking fee
• Storage & Re- Delivery Fees will apply to delayed Installtions of 15
days or more
Discounts are based on this particular group /an our volume of products
For other package of products, or individual product pricing,
Sub -Total
$32,24700
Dellinst /Frt
$2,13000
Tax
$2,66038
Total
$37,037.38
Comments
All LifeFitness treadmills
require a 110 Volt, 20 amp
dedicated circuit, with a
1144
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
MEETING DATE: March 21, 2006
AGENDA HEADING: Consent
Consideration and possible action regarding adoption of a resolution authorizing the Director of
Planning and Building Safety to sign Notices of Completion for projects completed underthe
Residential Sound Insulation Program
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION.
Recommendation — (1) City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the Director of Planning
and Building Safety to sign Notices of Completion related to Residential Sound Insulation
Projects; and /or (2) Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION.
Each Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Agreement between the City and the
Owners of a property Included in the RSI Program, states that the agreement will be recorded
at the County Clerk's Office This procedure has been followed for several years Recently It
has come to staffs attention that by not filing a Notice of Completion, title searches on such
properties reveal the contract without any indication that the work is complete on the home and
the contract is closed The City has Issued Notices of Completions on homes to the Property
Owners, Contractors, and City Clerk's Office for several years, but only recently has that form
been rejected by the County Clerk's Office In researching the reasoning behind such
rejection, it has been determined that the format required by the County Clerk's Office is
currently only authorized to be signed by the Public Works Director As the Public Works
Director has no direct Involvement In the RSI Program, and due to the number of homes to be
treated by the program on an annual basis (an estimated 300 homes per year), staff
recommends the authorization of the Director of Planning and Building Safety to sign such
Notices of Completion
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS'
Resolution No.
FISCAL IMPACT.
Operating Budget. N/A
Amount Requested. N/A
Account Number. N/A
Project Phase: N/A
Appropriation Required: _ Yes X No
ORIGINATED BY- DATE: March 9, 2006
Seimone Jurjis, erector of Planning and Building Safety
REVIEW7,1,Y /, / DATE. q �5 1
City Manager
P \Planning k Building Safety \S3ur7is \2taff Reports Part 2 \RSI Notice of Completion \Staff Report - y
March 21 2006 (NOC Resolution)2 doc -J4
i45
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE RSI
PROGRAM MANAGER TO RECORD NOTICES OF
COMPLETION PURSUANT TO CIVIL CODE § 3184.
The City Council of the city of El Segundo resolves as follows
SECTION 1 The City Council finds and declares as follows
A Under California law, subcontractors on a public works project may serve the
City with a stop notice to ensure that they are paid for their work If such stop
notices are timely filed, the City has a duty to withhold sufficient money from the
general contractor in order to pay the claim and any reasonable costs of litigation,
B To be effective, stop notices must be served on the City either within thirty (30)
days after the City records a notice of completion or, if a notice of completion is
not filed, within ninety (90) days after the project is deemed complete,
C A public project is deemed complete either when the project is accepted by a
public entity or work ceases for thirty (30) days,
D The Residential Sound Insulation ( "RSI ") Program is operated and managed, in
large part, like a public works project Although the Program seeks to improve
private property, it is in the public interest for construction projects associated
with the Program to be bid in accordance with the El Segundo Municipal Code
(`SSMC ") and Public Contracts Code ( "PCC ") to the extent practicable
Accordingly, most of the procedural requirements for public works projects have
been integrated into the RSI Program including, without limitation, form contracts
and specifications that are substantially the same as the City's standard public
works projects
E Were the RSI Program an actual public works project, the City Council would
deem when the project was complete and direct the City Engineer to record a
notice of completion ( "NOC ") Because the RSI Program is unique, however, the
City Council believes that determining whether phases of the overall Program,
i c, RSI improvements performed on private property, is a ministerial task best
delegated to the Director of Planning and Building Safety.
F Further, it is in the public interest for the City to make final payments on a RSI
projects as expeditiously as is practical in order to honor its contractual
obligations to the general contractor and limit the City's exposure to any
additional liabilities,
146
G Accordingly, delegating authority to the Director of Planning and Building Safety
to record NOCs as they relate to the RSI Program will help ensure that such
notices are recorded promptly and avo;u unnecessary delays
SECTION 2 The Director of Planning and Building Safety, with City Manager
approval, is authorized to record notices of completion, in a form approved by the City
Attorney, pursuant to Civil Code § 3184
SECTION 3 The Director of Planning and Building Safety is directed to inform the
City Council regarding the recordation of a notice of completion as soon as practicable
but not later than thirty (30) days after such recordation Failure to inform the City
Council within this time period will not invalidate the notice of completion
SECTION 4 This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption
Attest
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
Apprw,
Mark T
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of _ 2006
Kelly McDowell, Mayor
y Attorney
i i
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE. March 21, 2006
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING- New Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION.
Consideration and possible action regarding - (1) Introduce an Ordinance to adopt an
amendment to the 2001 California Building Code requiring new residential units to be in
compliance with the requirements of the City's Residential Sound Insulation program, 2)
setting second reading and adoption for April 4, 2006.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION-
Recommendation - (1) Introduce an Ordinance amending the 2001 California Building Code to
add residential sound insulation standards, (2) schedule second reading and adoption forApril
4, 2006, and /or (3) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
On January 30, 2006 the City of El Segundo entered into a settlement agreement with Los
Angeles World Airports (LAWA) regarding the planned expansion of the Los Angeles Airport
(LAX) Since, the Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) program operates under the new terms
of the settlement agreement, a provision in the agreement requires that residential units, that
are newly constructed and not part of the RSI program, would meet or exceed the same sound
insulating standards as compared to residential units that are retrofitted under the RSI
program By amending the adopted building code with the attached ordinance the City
ensures that new residential construction, including additions, will be in compliance with the
requirements of the City's Residential Sound Insulation program
ued on next
Draft Ordinance
FISCAL IMPACT None
Operating Budget: NIA
Amount Requested: N/A
Account Number N/A
Project Phase, N/A
Appropriation Required: _ Yes X No
ORIGINATED BY. DATE.3
Seimone Jurjis, Director of Planning and Building Safetv
DATE. 1i /15 /G�
City Manager
14 8
is
STAFF REPORT. March 21, 2006 Page 2
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION (cont.)
The requirement for new residential construction to meet the same sound Insulating standard
as required under the RSI program, maybe accomplished using two different methods The
first method would allow an applicant that Is proposing to construct a new residential structure
or add on to an existing one, to hire an acoustical engineer to perform an analysis and provide
a report stating the specific requirements needed to ensure that the Internal noise levels due to
LAX do not exceed 45 db The second method would allow an applicant to use the
construction standards stated in the attached ordinance This would relieve the applicant from
having to hire an acoustical consultant
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
The greatest difference between current standards of construction and the building code
amendments proposed in the attached ordinance are 1) the entire structure or room addition
must be covered with plywood versus only where required by the structural engineer, 2) cook
top hoods cannot exhaust to the outside air, 3) new drywall on the Interior must be 5/8" versus
''Y2" thickness; 4) windows must meet the specific sound insulting rating as required by the RSI
program
COST OF CHANGES
The average cost to retrofit a residential unit under the City's RSI program Is $43,000. This
Includes the cost of analysis, design, construction management, construction, and inspection
It Is anticipate the requirements of the attached ordinance would increase the cost of new
development an additional $25,000 per structure
P \Planning & Building Safety \Sturlis \Staff Reports Part 2 \RSI Code Adoption \CC Staff report RSI Ordinance
Amendment 3 -21 -2006 doc
149
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADDING § 13 -1 -4 TO THE EL SEGUNDO
MUNICIPAL CODE AND AMENDING THE 2001 CALIFORNIA
BUILDING CODE ( "CBC ") BASED UPON LOCAL CLIMATIC,
TOPOGRAPHIC, AND GEOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS.
The council of the city of El Segundo does ordain as follows
SECTION 1 FINDINGS The City Council finds and declares as follows.
A In accordance with Health and Safety Code § 17958 7, the City Council
incorporated the 2001 Edition of the California Building Code ( "CBC'), along
with certain amendments, into the t Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC ") by
Ordinance No 1349, adopted October 15, 2002
B Pursuant to the requirements of Health and Safety Code § 17958 7, the
City Council finds that there are local geographical conditions justifying the CBC
amendments set forth below Specifically, the City abuts the Los Angeles
International Airport ( "LAX "), one of the largest international airports in the
world Consequently, the City and its citizens are profoundly affected by noise
generated from air traffic using LAX Amending the ESMC and CBC through the
additions in this Ordinance will help reduce the noise impact from air traffic and
help improve public health, safety, and welfare including, without limitation,
quality of life and property value
C Based upon the foregoing findings, the changes made to the CBC by this
Ordinance are reasonably necessary to provide sufficient and effective protection
of life, health and property
SECTION 2 A new section 13 -1 -4 is added to the El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC ") to
read as follows
"13 -1 -4 Residential Noise Insulation Standards; Further Amendments to the Code
CBC Appendix § 1208A 8 3 is added to read as follows
Airport Noise Sources
1208A 8 3 01 Noise Insulation Requirements for New Construction
1208A 8 3 02 Purpose and Scope
The purpose of this section is to establish minimum noise insulation performance
standards for new residential dwelling units and additions of habitable rooms to
Page 1 of 9
.L
existing residential dwelling units to protect public health, safety, and welfare
from the effects of excessive noise, including without limitation, indoor quality of
life, speech interference, and sleep disruption
1208A 8 3 03 Applicability This section applies to all newly constructed residences and
habitable room additions to existing residences
1208A 8 3 04 Definitions For purposes of this section, the following words must have the
following meaning
"Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL)" means the noise measure defined
in 21 Code of California Regulations § 5001(d), and any successor regulation or
amendment
"Habitable Room" means a room that is a space in a structure for living, sleeping,
eating, or cooking Bathrooms, toilet compartments, closets, halls, storage or
utility space, garages, and similar areas are not considered habitable space
"LAX" means Los Angeles International Airport
"Noise Impact Boundary for LAX" means the area around LAX as defined in 21
California Code of Regulations § 5001(1), and any successor regulation or
amendment The City's Building Safety Department must at all times maintain a
current map of the Noise Impact Boundary
"Residence" means any Occupancy Group R building as used in El Segundo Title
15 of the El Segundo Municipal Code
1208A 8 3 05 Standards Any new Residence or addition of one or more habitable rooms to an
existing Residence that is within the Noise Impact Boundary for LAX must be designed to
ensure that internal noise levels due to LAX do not exceed of 45 dB CNEL. This standard may
be satisfied in two ways (1) by performing the acoustical analysis described in section E, below,
or (2) by employing the prescribed construction methods described in section F, below
1208A.8 3 06 Acoustical Analysis A building permit application for a new Residence or
addition of one or more habitable rooms to an existing Residence must comply with the
minimum noise insulation performance standards established in this section if it includes an
acoustical analysis demonstrating that the proposed design will ensure that internal noise levels
due to LAX aircraft noise will not exceed 45 dB CNEL The acoustical analysis is subject to
verification by the Building Official, who has the discretion to require post-construction/pre-
occupancy acoustic measurement to verify compliance with the 45 dB CNEL standard
A The acoustical analysis must be prepared by or under the
supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering The analysis must
consider and include the topographical relationship between LAX aircraft noise sources and the
Page 2 of 9
151
dwelling site, the characteristics of those noise sources, predicted noise spectra and levels at the
exterior of the dwelling site, the basis for this prediction (measured or obtained from published
data), the noise insulation measures to be employed, and the effectiveness of the proposed noise
insulation measures
B If the interior allowable noise levels are to be met by requiring that
windows be unopenable or closed, the design for the structure must also specify a ventilation or
air - conditioning system to provide a habitable interior environment The ventilation system must
not compromise the interior room noise reduction
1208A 8 3 07 Prescribed Construction Methods A building permit application for a new
Residence or addition of one or more habitable rooms to an existing Residence must comply
with the minimum noise insulation performance standards establish in this section if the design
incorporates the following construction methods
CONSTRUCTION METHODS IN THE 70 DB CNEL AND GREATER NOISE ZONE
1208A 8 3 08 Exterior Walls New walls that form the exterior portion of habitable rooms must
be constructed as follows
A Studs must be at least 4 inches in nominal depth
B Exterior finish must be stucco, minimum 7/8 -inch thickness, brick
veneer, masonry, or any siding material allowed by this code Wood or metal siding must be
installed over %retch minimum solid sheathing
C Masonry walls with a surface weight of less than 40 pounds per
square foot must require an interior supporting studwall that is finished with at least 5/8 -inch
thick gypsum wall board or plaster
D Wall insulation must be at least R -11 glass fiber or mineral wool
and must be installed continuously throughout the stud space
E Exterior solid sheathing must be covered with overlapping asphalt
felt
F Interior wall finish must be at least 5/8 -inch thick gypsum wall
board or plaster
1208A 8 3 09 Exterior Windows
A Openable Windows All openable windows in the exterior walls of
habitable rooms must have a laboratory sound transmission class rating of at least STC 40 dB
and must have an air infiltration rate of no more than 0 5 cubic feet per minute when tested
according to ASTM E -283
Page 3 of 9
152
habitable rooms must
B Fixed Windows All fixed windows in the exterior walls of
Have a sound transmission class rating of at least STC 40
Must be 5/8 inch laminated glass with STC rating of 40 dB
and must be set in non - hardening glazing materials, or
Must be glass block at least 3 -1/2 inches thick
C The total areas of glazing in rooms used for sleeping must not
exceed 20% of the wall area
1208A 8 3 10 Exterior Doors
A Exterior hinged doors to habitable rooms that are directly exposed
to aircraft noise and are facing the source of the noise must be a door and edge seal assembly that
has a laboratory sound transmission class of at least STC 40 dB
B Exterior hinged doors to habitable rooms that are not directly
exposed to aircraft noise and do not face the source of the noise must have a minimum STC
rating of 35 dB
C Sliding glass doors in habitable rooms must not be allowed in
walls that are directly exposed to aircraft noise Sliding glass doors in walls that are not directly
exposed must have an STC rating of at least 40 dB
D Access doors from attached garage to the interior of a residence
must have an STC rating of at least 30 dB
1208A 8 3 11 Roof/Ceiling Construction
A Roof rafters must have a minimum slope of 4 12 and must be
covered on their top surface with minimum '' /a -mch solid sheathing and any roof covering
allowed by this code
B Attic insulation must be batt or blow -in glass fiber or mineral wool
with a mimmum R -30 rating applied between the ceiling joists
C Attic ventilation must be.
1 Gable vents or vents that penetrate the roof surface that are
fitted with transfer ducts at least 6 feet in length that are insulating flexible ducting or metal
Page 4 nf 9
�JaI
ducts containing internal 1 -inch thick coated fiberglass sound absorbing duct liner Each duct
must have a lined 90- degree bend in the duct so that there is no direct line of sight from the
exterior through the duct into the attic, or
Noise control louver vents, or
Eave vents that are located under the eave overhang
4 Ceilings must be finished with gypsum board or plaster that
is at least 5/8 -inch thick Ceiling materials must be mounted on resilient channels
5 Skylights must penetrate the ceiling by means of a
completely enclosed light well that extends from the roof opening to the ceiling opening A
secondary openable glazing panel must be mounted at the ceiling line or at any point that
provides at least a 4 -inch space between the skylight glazing and the secondary glazing and must
be glazed with at least 3/16 -inch plastic or laminated glass The weather -side skylight must be
any type that is permitted by the Building Code The size of skylights must be no more than 20
percent of the roof area of the room
1208A 8 3 12 Ventilation
A A ventilation system must be provided that will provide at least the
minimum air circulation and fresh air supply requirements of this code in each habitable room
without opening any window, door or other opening to the exterior All concealed ductwork
must be insulated flexible glass fiber ducting that is at least 10 feet long between any two points
of connection
B Kitchen cooktop vent hoods must be the non - ducted recirculating
type with no ducted connection to the exterior
1208A,8 3 13 Fireplaces Each fireplace must be fitted with a damper at the top of the chimney
that is operated from the firebox and must have glass doors across the front of the firebox
1208A 8 3 14 Wall and Ceiling Openings Openings in the shell of the Residence that degrade
its ability to achieve an interior CNEL rating of 45 dB or less when all doors and windows are
closed are prohibited unless access panels, pet doors, mail delivery drops, air - conditioning, or
other openings are designed to maintain the 45 dB CNEL (or less) standard in the room to which
they provide access
CONSTRUCTION METHODS IN THE 65 DB CNEL TO 70 DB CNEL NOISE ZONE
1208A 8 3 15 Exterior Walls New walls that form the exterior portion of habitable rooms must
be constructed as follows
A Studs must be at least 4 inches in nominal depth
Page 5 of 9
154
B Exterior finish must be stucco, minimum 7/8 -inch thickness, brick
veneer, masonry, or any siding material allowed by this code. Wood or metal siding must be
installed over % -inch solid sheathing
C Masonry walls with a surface weight of less than 40 pounds per
square foot will require an interior studwall that is finished with at least 5/8 -inch thick gypsum
wallboard or plaster
D Wall insulation must be at least R -11 glass fiber or mineral wool
and must be installed continuously throughout the stud space
E Exterior solid sheathing must be covered with overlapping asphalt
felt
F hiterior wall finish must be at least 5/8 -mch thick gypsum
wallboard or plaster
1208A 8 3 16 Exterior Windows
A Openable Windows All openable windows in the exterior walls of
habitable rooms must have a laboratory sound transmission class rating of at least STC 35 dB
and must have an air infiltration rate of no more than 0 5 cubic feet per minute when tested
according to ASTM E -283
B Fixed Windows All fixed windows in the exterior walls of
habitable rooms must be at least 1/4-inch thick and must be set in non - hardening glazing
materials.
C The total area of glazing in rooms used for sleeping must not
exceed 20% of the floor area
1208A 8 3 17 Exterior Doors
A Exterior hinged doors to habitable rooms that are directly exposed
to aircraft noise and are facing the source of the noise must be a door and edge seal assembly that
has a laboratory sound transmission class of at least STC 35 dB
B Exterior hinged doors to habitable rooms that are not directly
exposed to aircraft noise and do not face the source of the noise must have a minimum STC
rating of 30 dB
inch thick.
C Sliding glass doors in habitable rooms must have glass that is 1/4-
Page 6 of 9
I5J
D Access doors from a garage to a habitable room must have an STC
rating of at least 30 dB
1208A 8 3 18 Roof/Ceiling Construction
A Roof rafters must have a minimum slope of 4 12 and must be
covered on their top surface with mimmum 1/2-mch solid sheathing and any roof covering
allowed by this code
B Attic insulation must be batt or blow -in glass fiber or mineral wool
with a minimum R -30 rating applied between the ceiling Worsts
C Attic ventilation must be�
1 Gable vents or vents that penetrate the roof surface that are
fitted with transfer ducts at least 6 feet in length that are insulating flexible ducting or metal
ducts containing internal 1 -inch thick coated fiberglass sound absorbing duct liner Each duct
must have a lined 90- degree bend in the duct so that there is no direct line of sight from the
exterior through the duct into the attic, or
Noise control louver vents, or
Eave vents that are located under the cave overhang
D Ceilings must be finished with gypsum board or plaster that is at
least 5/8-inch thick
E Skylights must penetrate the ceiling by means of a completely
enclosed light well that extends from the roof opening to the ceiling opening A secondary
openable glazing panel must be mounted at the ceiling line and must be glazed with at least 3/16 -
inch plastic, tempered or laminated glass The weather -side skylight must be any type that is
permitted by the Building Code
1208A 8 3 19 Floors The floor of the lowest habitable rooms must be concrete slab on grade or
wood framed floors
1208A 8 3 20 Ventilation
A A ventilation system must be provided that will provide at least the
minimum air circulation and fresh air supply requirements of this code in each habitable room
without opening any window, door or other opening to the exterior All concealed ductwork
must be insulated flexible glass fiber ducting that is at least 10 feet long between any two points
of connection
Page 7 of 9
i56
B Kitchen cooktop vent hoods must be the non - ducted recirculating
type with no ducted connection to the exterior
1208A8.3.21 Fireplaces Each fireplace must be fitted with a damper at the top of the chimney
that is operated from the firebox and must have glass doors across the front of the firebox
1208A.8 3 22 Wall and Ceiling Openings Openings in the shell of the Residence that degrade
its ability to achieve an interior CNEL rating of 45 dB or less when all doors and windows are
closed are prohibited Any access panels, pet doors, mail delivery drops, air- conditioning, or
other openings must be designed to maintain the 45 dB CNEL or less standard in the room to
which they provide access "
SECTION 3 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT EXEMPTION The City
Council determines that this ordinance is exempt from review under the California
Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq , "CEQA ") and
the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq , the
"State CEQA Guidelines ") because it consists only of minor revisions and clarifications to an
existing code of construction- related regulations and specification of procedures related thereto
and will not have the effect of deleting or substantially changing any regulatory standards or
findings required therefor This ordinance, therefore, is an action being taken for enhanced
protection of the environment and that does not have the potential to cause significant effects on
the environment
SECTION 4 SAVINGS CLAUSE Repeal of any provision of the ESMC or any other city
ordinance herein will not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude
prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before, this Ordinance's
effective date Any such repealed part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or
prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Ordinance
SECTION 5 SEVERABILITY If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed
invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the city council intends that such invalidity will not
affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the
provisions of this Ordinance are severable
SECTION 6 VALIDITY OF PREVIOUS CODE SECTIONS If this the entire Ordinance or
its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, any repeal of the ESMC or
other the city ordinance by this Ordinance will be rendered void and cause such ESMC provision
or other the city ordinance to remain in full force and effect for all purposes
SECTION 7 EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance will take effect on the 31" day following its
final passage and adoption
Page 8of9
.L �%
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 2006
Kelly McDowell,
Mayor
ATTEST
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 1 SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the
whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Ordinance
No was duly introduced by said City Council at a regular meeting held on the
day of , 2006, and was duly passed and adopted by said City Council,
approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of
said Council held on the day of 2006, and the same was so passed
and adopted by the following vote
AYES
NOES
ABSENT f
ABSTAIN
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
Page 9 of 9
i:J�
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 21, 2006
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING. New Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding a new Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license
for on -site sale and consumption of beer, wine and alcohol (Type 47) at a new restaurant
located at 403 Main Street, EA No 690 and AUP No 05 -5 Applicant Kenneth R Garmoe
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION'
1 Determine that the City Council does not protest the Issuance of the new Type 47 ABC
license at 403 Main Street, and /or,
2 Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this Item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION.
At Its April 4, 1995 meeting, the City Council directed staff to bring all future ABC licenses to it
for review The ABC regulations require a 30 -day review and comment period, for alcohol
sales at restaurants, after notification of the local police and planning departments The
grounds of a protest should relate to public health, safety or welfare concerns According to
the most recent Crime and Arrest statistics report (January 2005 — December2005, EXhibItAI
and A2) prepared by the Police Department, the proposed restaurant is located in Reporting
District (RD) 108 Based on 2005 reported data prepared by the Police Department, the
district had a total of 15 Part I crimes (criminal homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated
(continued on next page )
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1 Crime and Arrest Statistics by Reporting Districts (RD) (Exhibit Al -A2)
2 Police Reporting Districts Map (Exhibit B)
3 Approval Letter to Applicant dated March 1, 2006 (Exhibit C)
4 Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 9, 2006 (Exhibit D)
5 Approved Locations with Alcohol Licenses within the Downtown Specific Plan
(Exhibit E)
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Operating Budget
N/A
Amount Requested,
N/A
Account Number:
N/A
Project Phase.
N/A
Appropriate Required:
_Yes x No
ORIGINATED BY. DATE.
Seimone Jurji , Director of Planning and Building Safety
DATE•
a
L 9
STAFF REPORT March 21, 2006 PAGE 2
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: (cont)
assault, burglary, larceny -theft, motor vehicle theft and arson) and 16 felony and
misdemeanor arrests The Police Department and the Department of Planning and
Building Safety have no concerns regarding the issuance of the ABC license
The approval of this license request would be for the convenience of serving the applicant's
customers at the restaurant, and not a necessity A request for a new license is required,
since the applicant does not currently hold a Type 47 license, and the previous license
issued for this address location was a Type 41on -site sale and consumption (beer and
wine only) that was issued before the City's existing Zoning Regulations On March 1,
2006, the Director of Planning and Building Safety Department approved an Administrative
Use Permit application (EA No 690, AUP No 05 -5) for 403 Main Street The Director
conditioned the approval of the Administrative Use Permit to limit the restaurant's hours of
operations to 11 am to 11 pm Sunday through Thursday and 11 am to 12 pm Friday and
Saturday because of the restaurant's proximity to residential uses Exhibit E includes a list
of approved locations with alcohol licenses and the hours of operation within the Downtown
Specific Plan
The Director's decision was forwarded to the Planning Commission on March 9, 2006 The
Planning Commission chose to discuss the item and modified the conditions of approval
After testimony from the applicant, and discussion among the Planning Commissioners,
the Commission allowed the business to operate from 7 am to 11 pm daily and directed the
matter to be reviewed again in 90 days from the day of opening
The ABC license review is a completely separate application from the City's AUP process,
which requires mandatory findings that are regulated by the Department of Alcohol
Beverage Control The Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) in addition to
reviewing the City's AUP approval is responsible for running a complete background check
on all alcohol license applicants, as well as conducting site inspections, before it issues
issuance of any type of license
P \Planning & Building Safety\PROJECTS \676 - 700\690 \EA- 690ccreport doc
i�U
Exhibit Al 7/
L SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
JANUARY — JUNE 2005 CRIME AND ARREST STATISTICS BY Rc,PORTING DISTRICT (RD)
RD
PART I CRIMES
FEI RSTSSD
ARRREESTS
TOTAL
PBRCENTAGV +!-
101
21
11
32
220%
102
4
0
4
-60%
103
3
0
3
--70%
104
13
6
19
90%
105
2
0
2
-80%
106
13
3
16
60%
107
7
4
11
10%
108
11
5
16
60%
109
4
1
5
-50%
110
10
2
12
20%
lu
2
0
2
-80%
112
is
6
21
110%
113
13
7
20
100%
114
3
0
3
-70%
115
1
0
1
-90%
116
0
0
0
0%
201
8
3
11
10%
202
11
2
13
—30%
203
1
0
1
-90%
204
2
1
3
-70%
205
7
3
10
0%
206
10
5
15
50%
207
16
7
23
130%
208
19
10
29
190%
209
12
5
17
70%
210
20
12
32
220%
211
11
6
17
70%
212
7
4
11
10%
301
6
1
7
-30
302
1
0
1
-90%
303
7
2
9
-10%
304
0
0
0
0%
305
7
1
8
-20%
306
2
1
3
-70 %a
307
0
0
0
0%
308
18
8
26
160%
309
10
4
14
40%
310
1
0
1
-90%
311
4
1
5
-50%
312
9
4
13
30%
313
1
0
1
-90%
314
4
1
5
-50%
315
1
0
1
-90%
316
0
0
0
0%
317
2
0
2
-80%
318
24
12
36
260%
319
26
13
39
290%
320
10
4
14
40%
321
1
0
1
-90%
322
4
1
5
-50%
323
1
0
I
-90%
324
0
0
0
0%
TOTALS
385
156
541
Number of Reporting Districts = 52
Average # of Part I Crimes per Reporting District = 7
Average # of Felony/Misdemeanor Arrests per Reporting District = 3
Average # of Crimes and Arrests per Reporting District =10
Results from 01/01/20053 through 06/30/2005
Information provided by the Police Records Bureau
161
Exhibit A2
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
RECORDED PERIOD: JULY - DECEMBER 2005
PART I CRIME AND ARREST STATISTICS BY REPORTING DISTRICT RD
RD
PART I CRIMES
FELONY /MISD
ARRESTS
TOTAL
PERCENTAGE +/-
101
20
9
29
+52%
102
8
9
17
-10%
103
5
5
10
-47%
104
11
9
20
+5%
105
6
6
12
-37%
106
9
5
14
-26%
107
15
33
48
+152%
108
4
11
15
-21%
109
5
13
18
-5%
110
5
3
8
-58%
111
0
21
21
+10%
112
13
13
26
+37%
113
4
17
21
+11%
114
3
19
22
+16%
115
0
0
0
0%
116
0
15
15
-21%
201
9
11
20
+5%
202
2
28
30
+58%
203
9
6
15
-21%
204
3
19
22
+16%
205
8
10
18
-5%
206
6
12
18
-5%
207
9
22
31
+63%
208
17
13
30
+58%
209
16
31
47
+147%
210
8
21
29
+53%
211
12
14
26
+37%
212
4
20
24
+26%
301
9
14
23
+21%
302
5
8
13
-32%
303
6
25
31
+63%
304
1
7
8
-58%
305
7
17
24
+26%
306
1
1
2
-89%
307
0
0
0
00/0
308
22
47
69
+263%
309
12
19
31
+63%
310
2
3
5
-74%
311
5
8
13
-320%
312
1 8
5
13
32%
313
0
2
2
-890/1
314
4
14
18
-5 °fo
315
0
7
7
-63%
316
4
2
6
-68°!0
317
1
13
14
-26%
318
20
16
36
+89%
319
26
19
45
+137%
320
3
1 4
1 7
-63%
321
4
4
8
-580/a
322
2
0
2
-890/0
323
0
1
324
4
2
6
-68%
TOTALS
357
633
990
Number of Reporting Districts = 52
Average # of Part I Crimes per Reporting District = 7
Average # of Felony/ Misdemeanor Arrests per Reporting District = 12
Average # of Crimes and Arrests per Reporting District = 19
Results from 07/01/2005 through 12/31/2005
Records /eg Page 1 3/7/2006 y ,�
h .?
Exhibit B
Jyyy oom� ;
1
rC
T J
M �
O
"'1 V
Z [ �
� o
I
Ws
c
i
O
n
10 +
m
m
p9N
S
Of➢
III
It
H la
.. E._�
0 a p�,
1 o
N a
v
O '
WW
O
ca
N
u
._ ..
a,
rsY a Y V
'rte
tl M/ITgw� N
N
88 C a
a � '
X63
Exhibit C
Department of Planning and Building Safety
March 1. 2006
b 'x
1
Kenneth R Garmoe
403 Main Street
Elected Officials
El Segundo, CA 90245
Kelly McD°we11
Mayor
Joh Tem
M. yor Pr° G.,..
Ma
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment No. 690 and Administrative
GnunLll Member
Use Permit AUP No. 05 -5
EncK R " " ",
Ccunml Member
Sale of beer, wine and alcohol for on -site consumption
Carl Jacobson
(Type 47 ABC License) at a new restaurant
C0.001 Member
" " °y M °"°'•"
mynpha
Address: 403 Main Street, El Segundo
Ralph
Crty Tnasunr
City rmase
Dear Mr Garmoe
Appointed Officials
I am pleased to inform you that, in accordance with Chapter 15 -22 of the
'• cayala a
Cny Manager
El Segundo Municipal Code, the Director of Planning and Building Safety
M' �W;•M; .Y
Department has APPROVED Administrative Use Permit No. 05 -5 for the
on -site sale of beer, wine and alcohol (Type 47) at 403 Main Street The
following are the findings in support of each finding for this decision:
Department Directors
a "`P"""'•e'
Abmmrshabye S ervTSs
FINDINGS AND FACTS IN SUPPORT OF FINDINGS:
Norm AngM°
Fn Chrof
a"yA
Environmental Assessment EA No. 690
c
Libraryr cable Semees
Snm lah ,hy
Planning antl aulltl,ng
♦ ♦ ♦
S "°ry
Finding 1
Jack Way
P°Mal Chief
SbGa Manemr
Re[nan°n 6 Parks
_
. The proposed project is exempt from the requrrements of the
S"yen F. M,
P °^b°w°"ks
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, as the operation of an existing private structure
involving negligible or no expansion of use
www elsegundo.org
Facts in Support of Finding 1
1 The applicant proposes to provide for the sale of alcohol for on -site
consumption at a proposed restaurant "Su Casa" (a Bona Fide Public
Eating Place) CEQA does not require an environmental assessment if
the use has little or no physical improvements to the structure The
proposed restaurant will be located at street level within an existing 2-
story commercial building originally constructed in 1954 No additions
are proposed to the existing structure The proposed restaurant will
350 Main Street, ?=l Segundo, California 90245 -3813
Phone (310) 524 -2380 FAX (310) 322 -4167
b 'x
1
replace a former restaurant with a Type 47 license so no changes are
proposed to the operation
Administrative Use Permit 05 -5
Finding 1
• There is compatibility of the particular use on the particular site in
relationship to other existing and potential uses within the general area in
which the use is proposed to be located
Facts in Support of Finding 1
1 The applicant proposes to provide on -site sale and consumption of alcohol
in a restaurant The approximately 1,333 square -foot restaurant will
accommodate 77 indoor seats
2 The restaurant must obtain a State of California Alcohol and Beverage
Control (ABC) license for on -site sale and consumption of alcohol (Type
47)
3 The surrounding land uses include. neighborhood - serving commercial,
office, retail, restaurants, and residential The proposed restaurant which
will serve alcohol is compatible with the surrounding uses
4 The restaurants hours of operation are limited to 11 am to 11 pm Sunday
through Thursday and 11 am to 12 am Friday and Saturday
5 The General Plan land use designation for the site is Downtown Specific
Plan I
6 The zoning for the site is Downtown Specific Plan (DSF) and is located
within the Main Street District Restaurants are a permitted use in the zone
in accordance with Section VI.A 2 a ii of the Downtown Specific Plan The
proposed use requires an Administrative Use Permit (AUP) in accordance
with Section Vl.A4 a of the Downtown Specific Plan for the on -site sale
and consumption of alcohol at restaurants
7 On March 9, 2006, the El Segundo Planning Commission is scheduled to
Receive and File the Administrative Use Permit request
2 1 11! )
Findino 2
• The proposed use is consistent and compatible with the purpose of the
Zone in which the site is located
Facts in Support of Finding 2
1 The General Plan land use designation for the site is Downtown Specific
Plan
2 The zoning for the site is Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) and is located
within the Main Street District Restaurants are a permitted use in the zone
in accordance with Section VI A 2 a ii of the Downtown Specific Plan The
proposed use requires an Administrative Use Permit (AUP) in accordance
with Section VI A 4 a of the Downtown Specific Plan for the on -site sale
and consumption of alcohol at restaurants
3 The proposed use is consistent with Downtown Specific Plan Objective
LU4 -2 in that it contributes to creating an integrated, complimentary,
attractive multi -use Downtown to serve as the focal point for the civic,
business, educational and social environment of the community
4 The proposed use is consistent with Downtown Specific Plan Goal LU4 in
that it contributes to providing a stable tax base for the city of new
commercial uses primarily within a mixed -use environment, without
adversely affecting the viability of Downtown
5 The purpose of the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) and more particularly
the Main Street District of the DSP Zone is to serve community residents
by providing a pedestrian- oriented and pedestrian- friendly environment
Standards for the district are intended to maintain, enhance and protect this
character Retail and service uses should serve the residents, local
employees, and visitors to the City A mixed -use environment is
encouraged The proposed use is consistent with the purpose of this zone
in that the ground floor of the building will be occupied by a restaurant
which is a resident - serving, pedestrian - oriented use
6 The surrounding land uses include neighborhood - serving commercial,
office, retail, restaurants, and residential The proposed restaurant which
will serve alcohol will be compatible with the surrounding uses
3
16 to
Finding 3
• The proposed location and use and the conditions under which the use
would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity
Facts in Support of Finding 3
1 The proposed restaurant will be located within an existing building The
parcel has six existing parking stalls which will be maintained
2 The surrounding land uses include neighborhood - serving commercial,
office, retail, restaurants, and residential The proposed restaurant which
will serve alcohol will be compatible with the surrounding uses
3 The restaurant's hours of operation are limited to 11 am to 11 pm Sunday
through Thursday and 11 am to 12 am Friday and Saturday
4 The existing restaurants in the surrounding area with alcohol licenses have
not been a source of crime or security problems
Findino 4
• Potential impacts that could be generated by the proposed use, such as
noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibration, odors, traffic, and hazards have been
recognized and compensated for
Facts in Support of Finding 4
1 The sale of alcohol will not create any new impacts that would not be
normally associated with a restaurant
2 The restaurant's hours of operation are limited to 11 am to 11 pm Sunday
through Thursday and 11 am to 12 am Friday and Saturday
3 The surrounding land uses include neighborhood - serving commercial,
office, retail, restaurants, and residential The proposed restaurant, which
will serve alcohol, will be compatible with the surrounding uses
Finding 5
• The State of California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control will issue a
license to sell alcohol to the applicant
4
167
Facts in Support of Finding 5
The applicant must obtain a license from the State of California Department
of Alcohol Beverage Control
PLANNING AND BUILDING SAFETY DIRECTOR ACTION
Based on these findings and facts in support of these findings, the Director of
Planning and Building Safety APPROVES the proposed project, subject to the
following conditions
1 The restaurant's hours of operation must be limited to 11 am to 11 pm
Sunday through Thursday and 11 am to 12 am Friday and Saturday
Applicant's sale of alcoholic beverages must comply with Business &
Professions Code §25631 Any change to the hours of operation or the hours
that alcohol may be served is subject to review and approval by the Director
of Planning and Budding Safety
2 The applicant must obtain and maintain all licenses required by the Alcoholic
Beverage Control Act (Business & Professions Code § §23300 et seq )
3 The Planning and Building Safety Department and the Police Department
must be notified of any change of ownership of the approved use in writing
within 10 -days of the completion of the change of ownership A change in
project ownership may be cause to schedule a hearing before the Planning
Commission regarding the status of the use permit
4 The applicant must comply with all regulations of the Alcoholic Beverage
Control Act and the regulations promulgated by Alcoholic Beverage Control
Board including, without limitation, the regulations set forth in 4 Cal Code o
Regs §§ 55 et seq
5 The applicant must not have any outdoor seating, unless approved by the
Director of Planning and Budding Safety
6 The parking lot of the premises must be equipped with lighting of sufficient
power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct
of all persons on or about the parking lot
7 Owners of the restaurant must post a sign in a clear and conspicuous location
listing a phone number at which a responsible party may be contacted during
all open hours of the establishment to address any concerns of the
community regarding noise in the restaurant and parking lot Said contact's
name and phone number must also be available through the restaurant staff
at all times
5
i68
8 The applicant must, at all times, display a Designated Driver sign of at least
ten inches by ten inches (10" X 10 ") in the bar area of the restaurant at eye
level The sign must be worded in a way that reminds patrons who are
consuming alcohol to designate a non - drinking driver
9 "No Loitering" signs must be posted to the rear of the property and on
property adjacent to the licensed premises, under the control of the licensee
Such signs must measure no less than 7" X 11" and the lettering must be no
less than 1" in height
10 There must be no exterior advertising of any kind or type, including
advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the
availability of alcoholic beverages Interior displays of alcoholic beverages
which are clearly visible to the exterior must constitute a violation of this
condition
11. All employees serving alcoholic beverages to patrons must enroll in and
complete a certified training program approved by the State Department of
Alcoholic Beverages Control (ABC) for the responsible sales of alcohol The
training must be offered to new employees on not less than a quarterly basis
12 Any and all employees hired to sell alcoholic beverages must provide
evidence that they have either
a. Completed training from the State of California Department of Alcoholic
Beverage Control (ABC), Inglewood District Office administered
Leadership and Education in Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program in the
form of an ABC - issued certificate, or,
b Completed an accepted equivalent by the ABC, Inglewood Distnci
Office to ensure proper distribution of beer, wine and distilled spirits to
adults of legal age If any prospective employee designated to sell
alcoholic beverages does not currently have such training, then;
c The ABC - licensed proprietors must have confirmed with the Planning
and Budding Safety Department within fifteen (15) days of the
Director's decision, or by final project approval, that a date certain has
been scheduled within the local ABC Office to complete the LEAD
course
d Within thirty (3D) days of taking said course, the employees, or
responsible employer must deliver each required certificate showing
completion to the Police Department
13 The licensee must have readily identifiable personnel to monitor and control
the behavior of customers inside the building premises Staff must monitor
6 ' 16q
activity outside in the parking lot and any adjacent property under the
establishment's control to ensure the areas are generally free of people and
are cleared of patrons and their vehicles one -half hour after closing
14 The building must not be occupied by more persons than allowed by the Fire
Code
15 if complaints are received regarding excessive noise, parking availability,
lighting, building access, and the like associated with the restaurant, the city
may, in its discretion, take action to review the Administrative Use Permit,
including without limitation, adding conditions or revoking the permit
16 The Applicant agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from and
against any claim, action, damages, costs (including, without limitation,
attorney's fees), injuries, or liability, arising from the City's approval of
Environmental Assessment No 690 and Administrative Use Permit No 05 -5
Should the City be named in any suit, or should any claim be brought against
it by suit or otherwise, whether the same be groundless or not, arising out of
the City approval of EA -690 or AUP 05 -5, the Applicant agrees to defend the
City (at the City's request and with counsel satisfactory to the City) and will
indemnify the City for any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out
in settlement or otherwise. For purposes of this section "the City" includes the
City of El Segundo's elected officials, appointed officials, officers, and
employees.
PLANNING COMMISSION
Please be advised that this does not conclude the review process This
determination will be transmitted to the Planning Commission at its March 9, 2006
meeting with the recommendation that the Planning Commission Receive and Fii
the determination An appeal of this decision may be filed with the Plannin§
Division prior to the Planning Commission meeting at which this decision is to be
received and filed If an appeal is filed, the item will be scheduled for a future
public hearing (as required by the Municipal Code) The City Council will
determine whether or not to protest the issuance of the ABC License for the sale
of alcohol for on -site consumption at its meeting on March 21, 2006
If you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact
Alexis Schopp, Planning Technician at (310) 524 -2343
Sincerely,
Seimone Juigis irector
Planning and Building Safety Department
P \Piannng & BuMing Safety\PROJECTS \616 -700 \690 \EA -690 AUPLTR doc
7
1 0
Exhibit D
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PUBLIC HEARING: March 9, 2006
SUBJECT. Environmental Assessment No. EA -690
Administrative Use Permit No. AUP 05 -5
APPLICANT: Kenneth R. Garmoe
PROPERTY OWNER: Bill Ruane
REQUEST: Sale of beer, wine and alcohol for on -site
consumption (Type 47 ABC License) at a new
restaurant
PROPERTY INVOLVED: 403 Main Street
DESCRIPTION
The Planning Division received the above referenced application for an
Administrative Use Permit (AUP) to allow the sale of beer, wine and alcohol for on-
site consumption at a proposed bona fide public eating -place (Type 47 ABC
License). The proposed restaurant "Su Casa," will be located in an existing building
that was previously used as a restaurant (formerly La Paz) The site is within the1
Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) Zone and more particularly the Main Street District
of the DSP The restaurant will be located at the street level of an existing two -story
budding Beer, wine and alcohol will be served within the 900 square -foot dining
area The dining area will have 77 seats There are six existing parking spaces on-
site
The owner of the restaurant will be requesting a new (Type 47) license from the
State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for this
establishment An AUP is also needed since there is no previous business with a
license at this location, before current zoning regulations were adopted Section
VI A 4 a of the El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan, requires an AUP for on -site
alcohol consumption at restaurants and similar establishments The permit has a
condition of approval that restricts the restaurant hours of operation from 11 am to 11
pm Sunday through Thursday and 11 am to 12 am Friday and Saturday because of
the restaurant's proximity to residential uses Exhibit A provides a summary of the
2
i `71
hours of operations for establishments with alcohol licenses in the Downtown
Specific Plan area Several other conditions of approval were required addressing
the restaurant's operation to ensure compatibility with the neighborhood and
compliance with ABC regulations
Planning staff reviewed the application and the Director made the necessary findings
to grant an Administrative Use Permit The attached letter specifies all of the
required findings for the permit
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and File
III. EXHIBITS
A Approved Locations with Alcohol Licenses within the Downtown Specific Plan
B Letter to applicant, dated March 1, 2006
C Administrative Use Permit application
D Site Plan and Floor Plan
Prepared by Alexis Schopp, Planning Technician
Kimberly C stensen, AICP, Planning Manager
Planning an Building Safety Department
Seimone Ju s, rector
Planning an Bui ing Safety Department
P \DEPTIPLANNINGB BUILDING AND SAFETY\PROJEGTS \676- 7001EA- 690\EA- 69OPmr
I
17�
Exhibit E
Approved Locations with Alcohol Licenses within the
Downtown Specific Plan
I T.ieence I
" - -"
Type
Name Address
Hours
I
7 00 a in to 11 00 p in Sunda% through
1 I 21
Holly Main Liquor 404 Main St
Thursday and Friday — Saturday 7 am to 12
am
? 21
Cooke's Market 12l W Grand Ave
7 00 a m to 10 00 p m Monday through
I
I
Sunday
11 00 a m to 3 00 p in , and weeknights from
3
41
Chef Harries
411 -1/2 Main St
5 00 p in to 10 00 p m , Monday through
Friday and Saturday from 5 00 p m to 10 00
p m (dinner only)
8 00 a.m to 11 00 p.m seven days a week
Outdoor entertainment and dancmg with
amplified sound is prohibited Monday and
4
41
Papacito's
143 Main St
Tuesdays, excluding holidays, and allowed on
Wednesdays and Thursdays between the hours
of 5.00 p.m and 8 p.m on Fridays and
Saturdays between I p.m and] 0 p m and on
Sunday between 11.30 a in and 8 p.m
5
41
El Tarasco
210 Main St
10.00 a.m to 11.00 p m, 7 days a keek*
11.00 a m to 9 00 p.m Monday through
6
41
Stuft Pizza
400 Main St
Thursday, 11.00 a m to 10 00 p m Friday and
Saturday, 12 00 pm to 8 30 p m Sunday
11 OOamto200pmand400pmto900pm
8
41
Hana Haru Sushi Bar
409 Main St
Monday through Friday, Saturday and Sunday
500 am to900pm*
11 00 a in to 9 00 p in Monday through
9
41
Richmond Bar and Grille
145 Richmond St
Thursday, I 1 00 a m to 10 00 p m on Friday,
11 00 a m to 3 00 p m Saturday Sunday
Closed *
1 (.)
P PBStProjects�676 .700\EA- 690'J)SPA13CLicense doc
174
11 am to230pm and 400pm to 930 pm
St
Monday through Thursday, I 1 a in to 2 30
10 41 Canton Low Restaurant 435 -39 Main
p in and 4 00 p in to ID 00 p in on Friday,
I
and 4 p in to 10 p in Saturday*
I
11 41
I Indian Summer
219 Main Street
10 00 am to 12-00 am, seven days a week
I
12
�
41
Second City Bistro
223 Richmond St
Monday through Sunday I 1 a m to
2 30pm and 500pm to 1000pm*
13 41
Havana Sandwich Company
229 Main St
11.00 a in to 10 00 p in, seven days a week
14 41
Good Stuff Restaurant
131 W Grand
from 7 00 a m to 9 00 p m., seven days a week
Ave
7 00 a.m to 10 00 p.m. Monday through
15
41
Farm Stand Inc
422 Main St
Thursday and 7 00 a in to 11.00 p.m Friday
and Saturday.
16
42
Old Town Patio
115 Richmond St
11.00 a.m to 10 00 p.m., seven days a week*
10:00 am to 2:00 a m Monday through
17
47
Tavern on Mam
123 Main St
Friday and 11 am to 2 am Saturday through
Sunda
18
48
Purple Orchid
221 Richmond St
11 00 a.m to 2.00 am daily*
Type 21- Off -Sale General (Package Store)
Type 41 -On -Sale Beer and Wine for Bona Fide Public Eating Place (Restaurant)
Type 42 -On -Sale Beer and Wine for Public Premises (Bar, Tavern)
Type 47 -On -Sale General for Bona Fide Public Eating Place (Restaurant)
Type 48 -On -Sale General- Public Premises (Bars, Night Club)
*Note pre -dates City's regulation of hours through an AUP or CUP
P PBStProjects�676 .700\EA- 690'J)SPA13CLicense doc
174
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
MEETING DATE: March 21, 2006
AGENDA HEADING: Reports — Council Member Busch
Consideration and possible action regarding a status report on technology available for law
enforcement regarding "Automatic License Plate Recognition Systems" utilized for purposes of
identifying vehicles that may be the subject of unlawful activities or that have outstanding
violations (Fiscal Impact, None)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
(1) It is recommended the City Council receive and file the status report,
(2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
Auto theft is a regional problem that results in millions of dollars of property losses in California
and Los Angeles County each year In 2004 the California Attorney General cited a 6 7
percent increase in vehicle theft Vehicle`theft is a recurrent crime problem in El Segundo with
91 cars stolen in 2004 and 70 cars stolen in 2005 The Police Department's experience is that
criminals who drive stolen vehicles in El Segundo often steal other vehicles and commit other
crimes in this city
Police officers currently submit license plate information for State of California criminal
database checks by entering the information into mobile data computers and by voice radio
with Communications Unit dispatchers. Officers submit the information when they are
investigating suspicious circumstances or crimes, responding to calls for service, or during
proactive patrol contacts They are limited in the number of license plates that they can submit
by time delays with the information returns over the wireless mobile data system, with
constraints related to congested radio traffic, and with the ability to accurately note vehicles
passing at moderate to high speed
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
None
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget:
Amount Requested:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required: _Yes No
ORIGINA TED BY: DATE: March 13, 2006
a ayt, Chie f once
City Manager
DATE: 3 A/,C /
17.E %
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION. (Continued)
Automatic License Plate Recognition Systems (ALPRS) perform the same functions that an
officer currently performs but faster ALPRS checks license plates with a database without
regard to the characteristics of the driver, the condition of the vehicle or any other subjective or
intuitive reasoning on the part of the officer Since ALPRS checks license plates against a
locally stored database table, the comparison and response is almost immediate
The ALPRS may also be programmed to check for information other than stolen vehicle
recognition It can be used to search for delinquent parking ticket vehicles or for other known
wanted vehicles In addition, it can be used to capture a list of all vehicles passing a location
over a given time period
The Automatic License Plate Recognition Systems software uses complex technology to read
the letters and special symbols of California license plates When a license plate is detected,
the software identifies the individual characters of the plate for each passing vehicle This
results in a high degree of accuracy for each passing license plate that is captured When the
license plate is compared to the stolen vehicle database list, it alerts the operator with an
audible sound and captures an image of the license plate and a portion of the vehicle for the
operator to review and evaluate The software can be combined with a wireless
communications card and operate remotely without an officer present
Police Department Staff is currently evaluating four varieties of ALPRS They are Remington
ELSAG, AutoVU, Hamilton Pacific (PIPPS), and Civics Staff plans to further evaluate the
available technology and in order to recommend the best system for our particular needs
However, our preliminary research indicates that we may soon be requesting the approval of
grant funds for the purchase of two ALPRS one mobile (vehicle mounted) and one stationary
(to be set up at temporary fixed posts) No formal quotes have been requested, but it appears
that the systems should cost less than $30,000 each
1 l �I