2003 AUG 15 CC PACKETAGENDA
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street
The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items
Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City - related business that is within the
jurisdiction of the City Council and /or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portion of the
Meeting During the first Public Communications portion of the Agenda, comments are limited to those items
appearing on the Agenda. During the second Public Communications portion of the Agenda, comments may be made
regarding any matter within the jurisdiction of the City Council Additionally, the Public can comment on any Public
Hearing item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing portion of such item. The time limit for comments is five (5)
minutes per person
Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state: Your name and residence and the
organization you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits
Members of the Public may place items on the second Public Communications portion of the Agenda by submitting a
Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2 00
p.m the prior Tuesday) Other members of the public may comment on these items only during this second Public
Communications portion of the Agenda. The request must include a brief general description of the business to be
transacted or discussed at the meeting. Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings
if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not exceed five (5) minutes
in length
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact City Clerk, 524 -2305. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to
make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2003 — 7:00 P.M.
5:00 P.M. SESSION
(Adjourn to 7:00 p.m. Session)
7:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER
Next Resolution # 4322
Next Ordinance # 1365
INVOCATION — Pastor Steve Sanchez of Hope Chapel
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Councilmember Kelly McDowell
2
PRESENTATIONS —
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on
behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to
addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. While all
comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The
Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed.
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda by title
only.
Recommendation — Approval.
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS
1. Continued Public Hearing for consideration and possible action regarding a
request to construct nine townhouse -style condominium "live /work" units with:
(1) a Variance request to allow access to the site from Grand Avenue; (2) a Zone
Text Amendment, which would allow a 15 foot front yard setback on lots with a
depth of less than 140 feet in the MDR Zone and a definition of a "live /work" use;
(3) a subdivision request to allow the construction of nine townhouse -style
"live /work" units through Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 54134; and (4) a Smoky
Hollow Site Plan request that would activate of the Medium Density Residential
Zone for the property.
Recommendation — (1) Open continued Public Hearing; (2) Discussion; (3) Reading of
Resolution approving Environmental Assessment No. 608, Subdivision No. 03 -2,
Variance 03 -4; and Smoky Hollow Site Plan No. 03 -1; (4) Introduction of Ordinance for
Zone Text Amendment No. 03 -1; (5) Schedule second reading and adoption of
Ordinance on September 2, 2003; (6) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related
to this item.
3
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
2. Consideration and possible action regarding adopting an ordinance to allow the
City of Hawthorne to include Area A and B of the Los Angeles Air Force Base
( LAAFB) into Hawthorne Redevelopment Agency (RDA) District No. 2 as part of
the financing mechanisms for the LAAFB modernization project.
Recommendation — (1) Discussion; (2) Introduction and Reading of Ordinance; (3)
Schedule second reading and adoption of Ordinance on September 2, 2003; (4)
Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a call for discussion of
an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business.
3. Warrant Numbers 2535207 to 2535496 on Register No. 21 in the total amount of
$2,220,248.82 and Wire Transfers from 7/25/03 through 8107/03 in the total amount
of $300,665.60.
Recommendation — Approve Warrant Demand Register and authorize staff to release.
Ratify: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or
agreement; emergency disbursements and /or adjustments; and wire transfers.
4. City Council Meeting Minutes of August 5, 2003 and July 15, 2003
Recommendation — Approval.
5. Consideration and possible action regarding approval of a $1,000,000 grant from
the FAA to be used for the Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program.
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the Mayor to execute the FAA Grant Agreement for
Project No. AIP 3 -06- 0139 -25; (2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to
this item.
4
6. Consideration and possible action authorizing the City Manager to send written
notice to the El Segundo Unified School District ( "District ") of the City's intention
to deduct the cost of the City employed crossing guards from the annual District
contribution of $250,000.
Recommendation — (1) Authorize the City Manager to send written notice to the El
Segundo Unified School District ( "District ") of the City's intent to deduct the cost of the
City employed crossing guards at a cost of $21,800 from the annual District contribution
of $250,000, leaving a balance due of $228,200; (2) Alternatively, discuss and take other
action related to this item.
7. Consideration and possible action regarding a Resolution providing for salary and
benefit changes to Chapter 1A2 (Management - Confidential Series) of the El
Segundo Administrative Code. Fiscal Impact $351,053 for FY 2003/04 and FY
2004/05).
Recommendation — (1) Adopt the attached Resolution; (2) Alternatively, discuss and
take other action related to this item.
8. Consideration and possible action to accept the installation of electrical street
lighting conduits at the Nash Street/Park Place intersection — Approved Capital
Improvement Program. (Final Cost $7,614)
Recommendation — (1) Accept the work as complete; (2) Authorize the City Clerk to file
the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's Office; (3)
Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
9. Consideration and possible action to authorize staff to solicit proposals from
qualified consulting engineering firms to provide construction management
services for the Douglas Street Gap Closure /Railroad Grade Separation Project —
Approved Capital Improvement Program. (Estimated Cost $500,000)
Recommendation — (1) Approve staff to solicit proposals; (2) Alternatively, discuss and
take other action related to this item.
10. Consideration and possible action to waive the formal bidding process on the
purchase of 15 Data 911 M5 Mobile Data Computer systems (MDC) for the El
Segundo Police Department. Fiscal Impact is approximately $116,000 using grant
funds.
Recommendation — (1) Approve the purchase of 15 Data 911 MDC systems and
equipment using funds from the Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) grant and
California Law Enforcement Equipment Program (CLEEP) grant account; (2)
Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
5
11. Consideration and possible action to waive the formal bidding process on the
purchase of 13 Automatic Vehicle Locator (AVL) status - mapping systems,
RADCOM client licenses, antennas, and related equipment, for the Police
Department Patrol Division. (Fiscal Impact is approximately $19,604 in grant
funds).
Recommendation — (1) Approve the purchase of the AVL status - mapping systems and
RADCOM client licenses using funds from the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant
(LLEBG) account; (2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
12. Consideration and possible action regarding a proposal by the Fire Department
for the City to enter into an agreement with Chevron that would allow the Fire and
Police Departments to load and use Chevron's UHF radio frequency for
emergency activities. Fiscal Impact $6,300 to upgrade radio capabilities.
Recommendation — (1) Authorize City Manager to sign Cooperative Agreement; (2)
Approve and authorize the expenditure of funds ($6,300) needed to load the Chevron
frequency and to upgrade the radio capabilities in the Dispatch Center, Fire Department
and Police Department to accommodate the frequency use; (3) Alternatively, discuss
and take other action related to this item.
13. Consideration and possible action regarding a Grant Application with the
Governor's Office of Emergency Services for the development of an emergency
response plan for chemical emergencies. Total Grant Application is for $18,250
with a soft match (staff time /resources) of $3,650.
Recommendation — (1) Approve Grant Application for City Manager's signature; (2)
Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
14. Consideration and possible action to waive the formal bidding process on the
purchase of 13 Data 911 M5 Mobile Data Computer Systems (MDC), in order to be
compatible with the Police Department's recommended MDCs. The total cost is
approximately $110,848 using grant and Fire Department funds in a 90 % -10%
share.
Recommendation — (1) Approve the purchase of 13 Data 911 MDC systems and
equipment using funds from the FEMA Assistance to Firefighters Grant Award,
Executive Technology Review Committee approved FY 02/03 funds, and accrued
Developers Fees; (2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
2
15. Consideration and possible action regarding approval of Service Agreement
Amendment with the City of Redondo Beach /South Bay Youth Project, to provide
counseling services to El Segundo youth and families, between September 4, 2004
and June 30, 2004 at a cost of $27,498. (Fiscal Impact $27,498)
Recommendation — (1) Approve Service Agreement Amendment; (2) Authorize the
Mayor to execute Agreement Amendment; (3) Alternatively, discuss and take other
action related to this item.
16. Consideration and possible action regarding the waiver of fees for city services
associated with Richmond Street Fair and the American Heart Association's Heart
Walk.
Recommendation — (1) Waive fees for city services associated with the American Heart
Association Heart Walk; (2) Waive fees for city services associated with the Richmond
Street Fair; (3) Alternatively, discuss and take other action on related to this item.
CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA
F. NEW BUSINESS —
G. REPORTS — CITY MANAGER — NONE
H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY — NONE
I. REPORTS — CITY CLERK — NONE
J. REPORTS — CITY TREASURER — NONE
K. REPORTS — CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member McDowell —
Council Member Gaines —
Council Member Wernick —
Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs —
Mayor Gordon —
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have receive value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on
behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to
addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. While all
comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The
Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed.
7
MEMORIALS —
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government
Code Section §54960, et sue.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator, and /or
conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or discussing matters covered under
Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel); and /or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators.
REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required)
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED p
DATE: o 1410 3
TIME- o - 40 /
NAME-
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Special Orders of Business Public Hearing
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Continued Public hearing for consideration and possible action (public hearing) regarding a
request to construct nine townhouse -style condominium "live /work" units with: (1) a Variance
request to allow access to the site from Grand Avenue; (2) a Zone Text Amendment, which
would allow a 15 foot front yard setback on lots with a depth of less than 140 feet in the MDR
Zone and a definition of a "live /work" use; (3) a subdivision request to allow the construction of
nine townhouse -style "live /work" units through Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 54134; and (4)
a Smoky Hollow Site Plan request that would activate of the Medium Density Residential Zone
for the property.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Open Continued Public Hearing;
2) Discussion;
3) Reading of Resolution approving Environmental Assessment No. 608, Subdivision No.
03 -2, Variance 03 -4; and Smoky Hollow Site Plan No. 03 -1;
4) Introduction of Ordinance for Zone Text Amendment No. 03 -1;
5) Schedule second reading and adoption of Ordinance on September 2, 2003; and /or,
6) Other possible action /direction.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
(Background and discussion on the next page.....)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
A. Draft Resolution
B. Draft Ordinance
C. Planning Commission Staff Report form June 26, 2003
D. Initial Study of Environmental Impacts
E. Minutes of Planning Commission meeting of June 26, 2003
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget:
N/A
Amount Requested:
N/A
Account Number:
N/A
Project Phase:
N/A
Appropriation Required:
Yes x No
ORIGINA D BY: DATE:
Jam s M. Hansen, Director of Community, Economic and Development Services
REVW� BY:
Mary Strenn&Ay Manager
DATE: p�
1
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
On August 5, 2003, the City Council opened the public hearing on the proposed project. At the
request of the applicant, the Council continued the public hearing without discussion until the
August 19, 2003 City Council meeting.
On June 26, 2003, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed
project and adopted Resolution No. 2549, recommending City Council approval of the project.
Briefly, the proposed project is the construction of a nine -unit townhouse style condominium
project at 1225 East Grand Avenue. The Project is in the Medium Manufacturing (MM) Zone
and the Medium Density Residential (MDR) Overlay Zone.
The following applications require City Council action:
A. A subdivision (SUB No. 03 -2) request to allow the construction of nine
townhouse -style "live /work" units through Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
54134. The Smoky Hollow Specific Plan allows condominium development
as a permitted use. Residents would have exclusive rights to their personal
units and garage for "live /work" usage.
B. A Smoky Hollow Site Plan (SHSP No. 03 -1) review application would allow
MDR Overlay Zone to be activated for the site.
C. A Zone Text Amendment (ZTA No 03 -1) would amend Section 15- 7A- 4(D)(4)
of the ESMC to all "live/ work" uses as a permitted use in the MDR Zone.
The amendment would also amend Section 15 -1 -6 to add a definition of
"live /work" to the ESMC, which would define the types of "work" activities that
would be allowed in a "live /work" use. Current regulations do not allow
"live /work" as a type of use permitted in any zone. Currently a home
occupation business is permitted in residential zones, but a home occupation
license is more restrictive in the intensity of business operation that is allowed
in a residence than the "live /work" concept would be. The "live /work" definition
would broaden the types of business that would be allowed in a residential
building. Staff proposed that the "live /work" amendment would apply only to
projects in the MDR Zone. The June 26, 2003, Planning Commission staff
report (Exhibit C) contains a full analysis of the "live /work" concept.
D. A Variance (VAR No. 03 -4) is requested to utilize one of the existing three
driveways on Grand Avenue as an access point into the site. The MDR Zone
does not allow direct access from Grand Avenue. Since the applicant plans to
remove the existing drive aisles during demolition of the existing structure, a
variance is required to have a new access point from Grand Avenue. Since
the lot only has street frontage on Grand Avenue, it is not possible to access
2 �l 1 Q
the site from any other street. As a result, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of the variance request.
The Planning Commission Staff Report of June 26, 2003 (Exhibit C) contains a full project
description and analysis. Staff is recommending the addition of one condition to the project
that was not considered by the Planning Commission. To insure that vehicles waiting at the
access gate to enter the project would not block Grand Avenue, staff has incorporated a
condition of approval into the draft Resolution to require that the gate be able to be opened
electronically from within each dwelling unit for visitors.
The proposed project has been analyzed for its environmental impacts and a Draft Initial Study
(Exhibit D) has been prepared pursuant to Section 15063, of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). A Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts is proposed
for this project pursuant to Section 15070 of CEQA.
P.\Planning & Budding Safety\PROJECTS\ 600 - 625 \Ea - 608 \EA- 608ccsr.9 -16 -03 doc
011
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT NO. 608, SUBDIVISION NO. 03-02, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 54134, SMOKY HOLLOW SITE PLAN NO. 03 -01, ZONE TEXT
AMENDMENT NO. 03 -01 AND VARIANCE NO. 03 -04 TO CONSTRUCT NINE
TOWNHOUSE -STYLE CONDOMINIUM "LIVEIWORK" UNITS AT 1225 EAST
GRAND AVENUE.
The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares that:
A. On February 6, 2003 Albert L. Marco filed an application for Environmental
Assessment No. 608, Subdivision No. 03 -08, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 54134,
Smoky Hollow Site Plan No.03 -01, Zone Text Amendment No. 03 -01 and Variance
No. 03 -04 to allow a nine unit townhouse- style live /work condominium development
on a 0.5 acre site at 1225 East Grand Avenue.
B. Albert L. Marco's application was reviewed by City's Department of Community,
Economic and Development Services for, in part, consistency with the General Plan
and conformity with the El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC ");
C. In addition, the City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA "), the
regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations § §15000, et seq.,
the "CEQA Guidelines "), and the City's Environmental Guidelines (City Council
Resolution No. 3805, adopted March 16, 1993);
D. The Department of Community, Economic and Development Services completed its
review and scheduled a public hearing regarding the application before this Council
for August 5, 2003;
E. On June 26, 2003, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive public
testimony and other evidence regarding the application including, without limitation,
information provided to the City Council by Albert L. Marco; and adopted Resolution
No. 2549 recommending City Council approval of the project;
F. On August 5 and 19, 2003 the City Council held a public hearing to receive public
testimony and other evidence regarding the application including, without limitation,
information provided to the City Council by Albert L. Marco; and,
G. The City Council considered the information provided by City staff, public testimony,
and by Albert L. Marco representative. This Resolution, and its findings, are made
based upon the evidence presented to the City Council at its August 5, 2003 hearing
including, without limitation, the staff report submitted by the Department of
Community, Economic and Development Services.
Page 1 01 4=
SECTION 2: Factual Findings. The City Council finds that the following facts exist:
A. The subject site is located in the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan, Medium Density
Residential (MDR) Overlay Zone, and is located at 1225 East Grand Avenue;
B. The subject site is a rectangular shaped 21,849 square foot lot (164.23 feet wide and
133.04 feet deep) and currently developed with a single -story light industrial building
with parking at the rear of the site and three access points from Grand Avenue;
C. The property to the west and east has a single -story light industrial building, to the
north a middle school and to the east is an 88 -unit condominium development.
D. The applicant is proposing a construct a nine unit townhouse style livelwork
development with attached two car garages and four guest parking spaces;
E. The applicant has applied for a Zone Text Amendment that would permit "Live/ Work"
uses in the MDR Zone as well as allow a 15 -foot front yard setback on lots less then
140 feet in depth in the MDR Zone
F. The applicant also applied for a variance that would allow access to the site from
Grand Avenue.
SECTION 3: Environmental Assessment. Because of the facts identified in Section 2 of this
Resolution, the proposed project has been analyzed for its environmental impacts and a Draft Initial
Study has been prepared pursuant to Section 15063, of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). A Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts is proposed for this project
pursuant to CEQA § 15070. The mitigation measures listed in the mitigated negative declaration
are sufficient to reduce all identified environmental impacts to less than significant levels.
Accordingly, based upon the evidence presented to the City Council, the City need not prepare an
environmental impact report for the proposed project.
SECTION 4: Notice of Determination. The City Manager, or designee, is directed to file a Notice of
Determination in accordance with Pub. Res. Code §§ 21152, 21167(f); 14 CCR § 15094; and any
other applicable law.
SECTION 5: Variance Findings. After considering the above facts, the City Council finds as
follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to
the other property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
The property is situated on the north side of Grand Avenue and is surrounded by
Center Street Middle School to the north, an 88 -unit condominium development to the
east, and a light industrial building to the west. There are no side streets to provide
Page 2 01 ''
alternative access points. The exceptional circumstance is that there is no practical
access to the site from any other public right -of -way except Grand Avenue. Most
other properties in the MDR overlay zone with frontage on Grand Avenue are corner
lots, which allow for alternative access from a public side street.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone but
which is denied to the property in question.
The variance to allow access from Grand Avenue would preserve the integrity of the
site. A variance will allow access into the site from Grand Avenue. Without a
variance, the site would be a land- locked parcel, which would deny substantial
property rights. Staff conducted a site visit and determined that the condominium
development (Grand Tropez) just east of the site has access from Grand Avenue, as
do other properties both east and west of the proposed site.
C. Granting the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which
the property is located.
Granting the variance to allow driveway access from Grand Avenue will not affect the
public welfare or safety. The proposed 18 foot wide driveway allows sufficient
driveway width to accommodate anticipated ingress and egress and traffic demand.
In addition, the 82 foot driveway length is sufficient to discourage any queuing of
vehicles onto Grand Avenue. The site is currently designed with three driveways off
Grand Avenue. Two of these would be removed. Since the applicant plans to utilize
an existing driveway location, it would not create an impact to the neighboring
properties.
D. Granting of the Variance will not adversely affect the General Plan.
Granting the variance will not adversely affect the General Plan. The overall proposal
would not result in a change to the present planned use for the area, as it is
consistent with the kind of uses permitted for the zone. The proposed development is
consistent with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan and the ESMC and
does not constitute a significant or substantial alteration in planned land uses.
Granting the variance for continued use of the existing driveway /access point located
at the southeast corner of the site off of Grand Avenue would not conflict with the
goals of the General Plan.
SECTION 6: General Plan and Zoning. The proposed project does not conflict with the City's
General Plan and the zoning regulations in the ESMC as follows:
A. This townhouse development is consistent with Goal 3 of the City's 2000 -2005
Housing Element which focuses on providing housing opportunities through new
construction, but also in a variety of locations and densities in accordance with the
land use designations detailed in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Also,
Policy 3.1 of the Housing Element specifies providing for the construction of 78 new
Page 3 0 1 14
housing units during the 2000 -2005 timeframe in order to meet the goals of the
Regional Housing Needs Assessment. This project would help meet this goal by
providing nine new residential units.
B. One of the purposes of the General Plan and zoning is to maintain consistency within
the City in terms of property development. The subject property is situated between
an 88 unit multiple - family development unit on the east, a light industrial building to
the south and west and a middle school to the north of the property. The applicant's
property is situated along Grand Avenue and is land locked on three sides. The
proposed project would be consistent with the transition zoning characteristics of the
MDR Zone which allows multiple - family residential uses between the R -1 Zone
property to the north and the Light Industrial uses to the south.
C. The applicant proposed modifications to the ESMC to permit "live /work" uses in the
Smoky Hollow Specific Plan are compatible with the types of uses already allowed in
home occupations in other parts of the City.
D. The applicant's proposed setback amendments to the MDR Zone are compatible with
setback requirements in the Multiple - Family Residential (R -3) Zone.
SECTION 7: Approval. Subject to the conditions listed on the attached Exhibit "A ", which are
incorporated into this Resolution by reference, the City Council approves Environmental
Assessment No. 608, Subdivision No. 03 -08, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 54134, Smoky
Hollow Site Plan No.03 -01, and Variance No. 03 -04
SECTION 8: This Resolution will remain effective unless superseded by a subsequent resolution.
SECTION 9: The City Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Resolution to Albert L. Marco to any
other person requesting a copy.
SECTION 10: This Resolution is the City Council's final decision and will become effective
immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of August 2003.
Mike Gordon, Mayor
Page 4 t �'
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, hereby certify that the whole
number of members of the City Council of the City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No.
was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor
of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council
held on the 19th day of August 2003, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
NOT PARTICIPATING:
ATTEST:
Cindy Mortesen,
City Clerk
APPROVED AST FO -
Mark D. Hensle , Ci
By:
Aarl H."Berger
Assistant City At/me)
Page 5 {'
RESOLUTION No.
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
In addition to all applicable provisions of the El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC "), Albert L. Marco
agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of El Segundo's approval of
Environmental Assessment No. 608 and Subdivision No. 03 -02, Smoky Hollow Site Plan No.03 -01,
Zone Text Amendment No. 03 -01 and Variance No. 03 -04. ( "Project Conditions "):
Zoning Conditions
1. There may be a maximum of nine "live /work" units developed on the existing 21,849
square foot parcel.
2. The applicant must install an intercom system in all the units to allow the remote
operation of the driveway control gate.
Public Safety Conditions
3. Before building permits are issued, the applicant must submit a photometric light study to
the Police Department for review and approval.
4. Street and unit addressing must be a minimum of four to six inches high, of contrasting
color to the background and illuminated during hours of darkness.
5. A minimum of one footcandle of light on the ground surface must be provided around all
sides of the building, throughout the driveway and over guest parking during hours of
darkness. Aisles, passageways and recesses related to and within all sides of the
complex, including the common deck areas, must be illuminated with a maintained
minimum of .25 -.50 footcandles during hours of darkness. Lighting devices must be
enclosed and protected by weather and vandal resistant covers.
6. All main entry doors, including entry doors from the garage into the residence, must be of
solid core construction, with a minimum thickness of 1.75 inches. Entry doors must have
a deadbolt locking device and the deadbolt throw must have a one -inch projection. The
cylinder guard must be of case hardened steel, with the outer edge angled or tapered
and free of spinning. The exterior portion of the lock must be connected to the inside
portion of the lock with bolts at least one - quarter inch in diameter and constructed of
steel. The locking mechanism must contain a minimum of a five -pin tumbler.
7. All main entry doors with glass constructed in or within 40 inches (including windows
along the side of the locking mechanism should either reverse the swing of the door if a
window is positioned within 40 inches of the locking mechanism, or reverse the position
of the window to be opposite the locking mechanism, or all glass should be replaced with
polycarbonate materials, or of fully tempered glass, or rated burglary resistant glazing.
Page 6 01-1 1
8. A panoramic door viewer (180 -190 degrees) must be installed in each main entry door.
9. Strike plates must be made with a minimum of 16 U.S. gauge steel, bronze or brass and
secured to the jamb by a minimum of two screws, off -set and which must penetrate at
least two inches into solid backing beyond the surface to which the strike plate is
attached.
10. Sliding glass doors must have a secondary locking device (i.e. locked by a key or a
twisting /turning device /Charlie bar). This device must limit any up and down or sideways
movement while the window is in the closed /locked position.
11. Double or French doors must have a secondary locking device, such as a cane or flush
bolt in addition to a deadbolt. The inactive leaf of double door(s) must be equipped with
metal flush bolts having a minimum embedment of 5/8 inch into the head and threshold of
the doorframe.
12. Windows adjacent to main entry of each unit must be constructed of high impact "plastic"
glass block.
13. Perimeter walls, not in the front yard setback, must be a minimum height of six feet and
of solid construction. Walls must limit climbing access (i.e. concrete walls must not have
varied sections where decorative blocks allow for stepping over the wall or part of the wall
consists of wrought iron). Wood, wrought iron or steel tubular perimeters must be six feet
high and all horizontal members must be on the inside of the perimeter. Where wrought
iron or steel tubular fencing is used, the horizontal members must run along the top and
bottom portion of the fence.
14. Residents of the individual units must be informed that an alarm permit is required by the
El Segundo Police Department for the operation of any home security alarm system,
whether audible or monitored by a security company.
Building Safety
15. Before building permits are issued, the applicant must submit a geotechnical report to the
Director of Community, Economic and Development Services for review and approval.
16. Before building permits are issued, the applicant must submit a grading report to the
Director of Community, Economic and Development Services for review and approval.
16. Before building permits are issued, plans must show conformance with the 2001
California Building, Mechanical, Electrical, Fire, Plumbing, and Energy Codes as a Group
R, Division 1 occupancy.
Page 7 �l 1
17. Before building permits are issued, plans will be reviewed for accessibility requirements
per Chapter 11 of the 2001 California Building Code.
18. Before building permits are issued, handicapped access must be provided to work portion
on the residence.
19. Before building permits are issued, separate Plumbing, Mechanical, and Electrical plans
will be submitted for plan check.
20. Before building permits are issued, the applicant must submit a drainage plan to the
Director of Community, Economic and Development Services for review and approval.
Fire Conditions
21. Before building permits are issued, the applicant must submit a fire sprinkler plan to the
Fire Chief for review and approval. Fire sprinklers must be installed before the issuance
of a certificate of occupancy.
22. Before building permits are issued, the applicant will develop plans, which identify fire
protection, notification, detection and access provisions and mechanisms for their testing
and maintenance.
23. The applicant will ensure that combustible storage for pre /post construction will comply
with the California Fire Code, including fire protection.
Public Works
24. Grand Avenue frontage must be improved to City standards with new sidewalks and
curbs. Any existing driveways to be abandoned must be removed and the parkway
reconstructed with full height curb and sidewalk improvements.
25. Any work or encroachment in the public right -of -way must have a Public Works Permit.
Service Fees
26. Before building permits are issued, the applicant will pay a one -time library services
mitigation fee of $0.03 per gross square foot of building floor area.
27. Before building permits are issued, the applicant will pay a one -time fire services fee of
$0.14 per gross square foot of building floor area.
28. Before building permits are issued, the applicant will pay a one -time police services
mitigation fee of $0.11 cents per gross square foot of building floor area.
29. Before building permits are issued, the applicant will pay the required sewer connection
fees (as outlined in Chapter 12 -3 of the ESMC) if the development requires a new sewer
connection.
Page 8
1 : -�
Miscellaneous Conditions
30. The applicant will ensure that water service connections are sized for the expected water
usage increase as a result of the new development.
31. The applicant must adhere to all Strom Water Pollution Prevention Guidelines for new
Developments.
32. Asbestos and lead -based paint analysis and removal must be performed in conformance
with federal, state and local regulations.
33. All activities associated with asbestos must be conducted under the direct supervision of
a certified asbestos consultant.
34. Demolition of structures that have asbestos containing materials (ACM) must comply with
the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403 - Asbestos
Emissions from Demolition /Renovation Activities.
35. The applicant will ensure that any trenches deeper than five feet and meeting CaIOSHA
definitions will comply with shoring requirements.
36. During construction and operations, all waste must be disposed of in accordance with all
applicable laws and regulations. Toxic wastes must be discarded at a licensed, regulated
disposal site by a licensed waste hauler.
37. All leaks, drips and spills occurring during construction must be cleaned up promptly and
in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations to prevent contaminated soil on
paved surfaces that can be washed away into the storm drains.
38. If materials spills occur, they will be cleaned up in a way that will not affect the storm
drain system.
39. The project must comply with Chapter 5 -7 of the ESMC establishing storm water and
urban pollution controls.
40. Before anticipated rainfall, construction dumpsters must be covered with tarps or plastic
sheeting.
41. Inspections of the project site before and after storm events must be conducted to
determine whether Best Management Practices have been implemented to reduce
pollutant loadings identified in the Storm Water Prevention Plan.
42. The owner or contractor must conduct daily street sweeping and truck wheel cleaning to
prevent dirt in the storm drain system.
43. Storm drain system must be safeguarded at all times during construction.
Page 9 �J 4- iJ
44. The applicant must construct pavement, retaining walls and landscaped areas in general
on -site to be maintained in order to prevent future soil erosion.
45. Albert L. Marco agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from and against any
claim, action, damages, costs (including, without limitation, attorney's fees), injuries, or
liability, arising from the City's approval of Environmental Assessment No. 608 and
Subdivision No. 03 -02, Smoky Hollow Site Plan No.03 -01, Zone Text Amendment No.
03 -01 and Variance No. 03 -04. Should the City be named in any suit, or should any
claim be brought against it by suit or otherwise, whether the same be groundless or not,
arising out of the City approval of Environmental Assessment No. 608 and Subdivision
No. 03 -02, Smoky Hollow Site Plan No.03 -01, Zone Text Amendment No. 03 -01 and
Variance No. 03 -04, Albert L. Marco agrees to defend the City (at the City's request and
with counsel satisfactory to the City) and will indemnify the City for any judgment
rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise. For purposes of this
section "the City" includes the City of El Segundo's elected officials, appointed officials,
officers, and employees.
By signing this document, Mr. Albert L. Marcos certifies that he has read, understood, and agrees to
the Project Conditions listed in this document.
Mr. Albert I. Marco, Property Owner
{If Corporation or similar entity, needs two officer signatures or evidence that one signature
binds the company}
P \Planning & Building Safety \PROJECTS \600- 625 \Ea - 608 \EA -608 CCRESO doc
Page 10 021
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADDING A NEW USE, DEFINED AS LIVE/WORK, TO
THE PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL ZONE SET FORTH IN THE EL SEGUNDO MUNICIPAL
CODE (ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 03 -1)
The city council of the city of El Segundo does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The Council finds and declares as follows:
A. On February 6, 2003 Albert L. Marco filed an application for Environmental
Assessment No. 608, Subdivision No. 03 -08, Vesting Tentative Tract Map
No. 54134, Smoky Hollow Site Plan No.03 -01, Zone Text Amendment No.
03 -01 and Variance No. 03 -04 to allow a nine unit townhouse- style
live /work condominium development on a 0.5 acre site at 1225 East
Grand Avenue.
B. Albert L. Marco's application was reviewed by City's Department of
Community, Economic and Development Services for, in part, consistency
with the General Plan and conformity with the El Segundo Municipal Code
( "ESMC ");
C. In addition, the City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under
the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§
21000, et seq., "CEQA "), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal.
Code of Regulations § §15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines "), and the
City's Environmental Guidelines (City Council Resolution No. 3805,
adopted March 16, 1993);
D. The Department of Community, Economic and Development Services
completed its review and scheduled a public hear n§ regarding the
application before this Council for August 5, 2003;
E. On June 26, 2003, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to
receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the application
including, without limitation, information provided to the City Council by
Albert L. Marco; and adopted Resolution No. 2549 recommending City
Council approval of the project;
F. On August 5 and 19, 2003 the City Council held a public hearing to
receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the application
including, without limitation, information provided to the City Council by
Albert L. Marco, and adopted Resolution No. approving
Environmental Assessment No. 608 for Zone Text Amendment No. 03 -1;
and,
Page 1 of 4 0209.
G. The City Council considered the information provided by City staff, public
testimony, and by Albert L. Marco representative. This Ordinance is made
based upon the evidence presented to the City Council at its August 5 and
19, 2003 hearing including, without limitation, the staff report submitted by
the Department of Community, Economic and Development Services.
SECTION 2: A new definition is added to El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMU) § 15 -1-
6 to read as follows:
"LIVE/WORK: The partial use of a dwelling unit for commercial
uses restricted to artists, craftsmen, photographers, and other fine
art work; professional services conducted by persons in recognized
professions such as architecture, engineering, and law; and other
business activities consisting principally of services as
distinguished from handling of commodities. Live/Work does not
include musicians; medical - related services; veterinary services; or
animal care services. Live/Work uses are in addition to residential
purposes and must comply with all the following:
A. Live/Work uses may only be located in the Medium Density
Residential (MDR) Zone of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan Area;
B. Live/Work uses cannot be open to walk -in trade or client visits
other than by appointment;
C. Only one employee, other than the resident, may be employed
on -site;
D. Work activity must be conducted entirely within the individual
unit;
E. Outdoor storage is not permitted;
F. Live/Work uses cannot generate hazardous materials or employ
hazardous processes;
G. The Live/Work use cannot be publicly observed;
H. Live/Work activities, such as noise, vibration, dust, odors, fumes,
smoke, heat, electrical interference or other similar nuisances,
cannot be perceptible beyond the individual unit;
I. Live/Work activities cannot increase pedestrian or vehicle traffic
beyond that ordinarily associated with residential occupancy nor
can it reduce the number of required off - street parking spaces
u2
Page 2 of 4
available for residential use;
J. One wall sign is permitted at the entrance of each individual unit.
The wall sign cannot exceed six square feet and cannot extend
above or out from the wall. Signs cannot emit sounds, order, or
visible matter, such as smoke or steam. Signage may be lighted
from another source such as gooseneck lamps. Internally
illuminated and neon signs are not allowed. Roof top signage is not
allowed within the zone. Signs cannot contain any revolving,
fluttering, flashing or spinning elements. All signage is subject to
City requirements for sign permits."
SECTION 3: ESMC § 15 -7A -2 is amended to read as follows:
"Section 15 -7A -2: Permitted Uses
A. Multiple - family dwellings including condominiums, apartments,
townhomes and small lot detached housing.
B. Live /work uses.
C. Other similar uses approved by the Director of Community,
Economic and Development Services as provided by Chapter 22 of
this Title."
SECTION 4: ESMC § 15- 7A- 4(D)(4) is amended to read as follows:
"Grand Avenue Setback: Notwithstanding any of the above -
referenced setbacks, a thirty foot (30) minimum setback is required,
except that all lots with a depth of less than 140' feet may provide a
minimum of fifteen feet (16) from the Grand Avenue right -of -way
line."
SECTION 5: If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court
of competent jurisdiction, the city council intends that such invalidity will not affect the
effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions
of this Ordinance are severable.
SECTION 6: The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this
Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City of El Segundo's book of original
ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting;
and, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it
to be published or posted in accordance with California law.
SECTION 7: This Ordinance will become effective on the thirty -first (31st) day following
its passage and adoption.
024
Page 3 of 4
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of September, 2003.
Mike Gordon, Mayor
APPROVED AS
Mark D. H
By:
Karl H. Berger
Assistant City tton
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Ordinance No. was duly introduced by said City Council at a regular meeting
held on the 19th day of August 2003, and was duly passed and adopted by said City
Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a
regular meeting of said Council held on the 2nd day of September, 2003, and the same
was so passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
Page 4 of 4 n
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PUBLIC HEARING: June 26, 2003
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment No. 608, Subdivision No.
03 -02, Smoky Hollow Site Plan No. 03 -01, Variance No.
03 -04 and Zone Text Amendment No. 03 -01
APPLICANT: Albert L. Marco
PROPERTY OWNER: Albert L. Marco
REQUEST: A nine unit Townhouse Development (Live/Work)
PROPERTY INVOLVED: 1225 East Grand Avenue
Introduction
The Planning Division has received a request to construct nine townhouse -style
condominium "live /work" units on a 21,849 square foot lot. The project is located on
the north side of Grand Avenue between Nevada Street to the west and Kansas Street
to the east in the Medium Manufacturing (MM) Zone. The project is also located in the
Medium Density Residential (MDR) Overlay Zone of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan
area. The project also includes a variance request to allow access to the site from
Grand Avenue. A Zone Text Amendment, which would allow a 15 foot front yard
setback on lots with a depth of less than 140 feet in the MDR Zone and a new
definition of "live /work" as a permitted use, is also proposed.
Recommendation
Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the facts as
contained within this report, and adopt Resolution No. 2549, recommending that the
City Council approve Environmental Assessment EA -608, Subdivision No. 03 -02,
Smoky Hollow Specific Site Plan Review No. 03 -01, Variance No. 03 -04, and Zone
Text Amendment No. 03 -01 with conditions.
Background
The project is located on the north side of Grand Avenue just east of Nevada Street
and west of Oregon Street. The site currently consists of a 21,849 square foot (0.5
acres) lot with a 7,560 square foot single -story light industrial building constructed in
1953. The existing unoccupied building, as well as the existing asphalt parking lot at
0 2 �_
the rear of the property, would be demolished during the construction phase of the
project. The most recent use of the building was for the storage of exotic cars.
The site is void of landscaping and currently has three points of access from Grand
Avenue. A six -foot high block wall separates the project site from the abutting property
to the east, a chain link fence separates the property to the north, and a driveway
separates the property to west.
The surrounding area is developed with a multiple - family residential development to
the east (Grand Tropez condominium complex), light industrial buildings to the south
and west, and Center Street Middle School to the north. The Grand Tropez
condominium project to the east was the first project approved under the Smoky
Hollow Specific Plan MDR Overlay Zone. This project, includes 88 units on 3.91 acres.
This area of the City of El Segundo has historically been devoted to industrial uses
such as aerospace, research and development and oil recovery. These uses are
gradually being replaced by small commercial, office, and residential uses within the
City. Over the past 20 to 30 years, the City of El Segundo has made a conscientious
effort to accommodate a range of uses and to meet current housing needs. Mixed -use
and transition zones have been encouraged. The vicinity of the project site is
representative of this transition and reflects the City's intent for application of the MDR
Zone.
IV. Analysis
The applicant proposes a medium density residential development consisting of nine
townhouse -style residential "live /work" units. A total of 10,195 square feet of
residential building area is proposed on the 21,849 square foot lot. Individually owned
residential units would be constructed as two -story units over garages. Each unit
would be designed with a patio and roof top deck, with the units arranged in a "U"
shape and a maximum height of 26 feet.
The site plan organization is designed to facilitate access, maximize useable area, and
establish a design theme and building orientation that benefits both the surrounding
land uses and the future project residents. Direct vehicle access to the site and
parking areas would be provided from Grand Avenue utilizing the existing curb cut and
drive aisle off of Grand Avenue. Units along the southern edge would have frontages
oriented toward Grand Avenue. The unit on the west side of the property would face
the light industrial building that abuts the site. The remaining units located on the north
side of the site would have frontages oriented toward Center Street Middle School. No
units are proposed for the east side of the site.
2
2'1
Surrounding land uses are as described in the following table:
The average size of the units would range between 1,287 and 1,778 square feet.
Each unit would have a workspace and bathroom on the ground level and one
bedroom and one bathroom on the upper level. No recreational facility is proposed on
this site. Internal access would be provided by one driveway located in southeast
portion of the site with meandering pedestrian paths throughout. In addition to two
garage parking spaces per unit, six visitor parking spaces would be provided on -site.
The remainder of the project site would be landscaped.
General Plan Consistency
This townhouse development would be in keeping with Goal 3 of the City's 2000 -2005
Housing Element which focuses on providing housing opportunities through new
construction, but also in a variety of locations and densities in accordance with the
land use designations detailed in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Also,
Policy 3.1 of the Housing Element specifies providing for the construction of 78 new
housing units during the 2000 -2005 timeframe in order to meet the goals of the
Regional Housing Needs Assessment. This project would help facilitate the
achievement of this goal by providing nine new residential units.
a) Subdivision No. 03 -02
The application includes a subdivision request to allow the construction of nine
townhouse -style "live /work" units through Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 54134. The
Smoky Hollow Specific Plan allows condominium development as a permitted use.
Residents would have exclusive rights to their personal units and garage for "live /work"
usage. Residences would be required to submit a business license application and all
appropriate documentation as required by the City for the "live /work" portion of their
unit. Residence would have a percentage of ownership in the common open space
areas as well as responsibility for maintaining the common landscape area through a
Homeowner Association (HOA).
0 2S
Land Use
Zone
North:
Middle School
Public Facility (P -F)
South:
Light Industrial
Medium Manufacturing (MM)
Grand Avenue Commercial
Overlay (GAC)
East:
Multi - Family
Medium Manufacturing (MM)
Medium Density Residential
(MDR)
West:
Light Industrial
Medium Manufacturing (MM)
Medium Density Residential
(MDR)
The average size of the units would range between 1,287 and 1,778 square feet.
Each unit would have a workspace and bathroom on the ground level and one
bedroom and one bathroom on the upper level. No recreational facility is proposed on
this site. Internal access would be provided by one driveway located in southeast
portion of the site with meandering pedestrian paths throughout. In addition to two
garage parking spaces per unit, six visitor parking spaces would be provided on -site.
The remainder of the project site would be landscaped.
General Plan Consistency
This townhouse development would be in keeping with Goal 3 of the City's 2000 -2005
Housing Element which focuses on providing housing opportunities through new
construction, but also in a variety of locations and densities in accordance with the
land use designations detailed in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Also,
Policy 3.1 of the Housing Element specifies providing for the construction of 78 new
housing units during the 2000 -2005 timeframe in order to meet the goals of the
Regional Housing Needs Assessment. This project would help facilitate the
achievement of this goal by providing nine new residential units.
a) Subdivision No. 03 -02
The application includes a subdivision request to allow the construction of nine
townhouse -style "live /work" units through Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 54134. The
Smoky Hollow Specific Plan allows condominium development as a permitted use.
Residents would have exclusive rights to their personal units and garage for "live /work"
usage. Residences would be required to submit a business license application and all
appropriate documentation as required by the City for the "live /work" portion of their
unit. Residence would have a percentage of ownership in the common open space
areas as well as responsibility for maintaining the common landscape area through a
Homeowner Association (HOA).
0 2S
b) Smoky Hollow Site Plan No. 03 -01
The following chart reflects development standards for the MDR Zone.
REQUIREMENTS
MDR ZONE STANDARDS
PROPOSED PROJECT
STANDARDS
Permitted Uses
Multi- family including
"live /work" Condominiums
condominiums
(ZTA No. 03 -01 required)
Minimum Lot Size
2.5 acres, a complete block or
0.5 acres, site is surrounded by
sites less than 2.5 acres that are
Medium Density Residential
completely surrounded by
(MDR) to the east, Medium
different zones
Manufacturing (MM) Zone to
the south and west and Public
Facility P -F Zone to the north
Lot Area per
18 units per acre (2,420 s.f. /lot
18 units /acre; 2,427 s.f. /lot
Dwelling
area per dwelling)
area per unit
Lot Coverage
11,580 s.f. (53 %)
10,195 s.f. (46.66 %)
Front Setback (East
30 ft. minimum
15 ft. /18 ft. fully landscaped
Grand Avenue
(Along Grand Avenue )
(ZTA No. 03 -01 required)
Side Setbacks
5 ft. minimum fully landscaped
5 ft. fully landscaped (including
walks and patios)
Rear Setbacks
10 ft. minimum
10 ft. /13 ft. fully landscaped
Height
26 ft. maximum
26 ft. maximum
Common Open
200s.f. /unit minimum
434 s.f. /unit
Space
Private Open
50 s.f. /unit minimum
281 -472 s.f. /per unit
Space
Landscaping
5% of total vehicular use area
19.64 %; 4,291 s.f. with
with permanent irrigation system
permanent irrigation system
Parking Spaces
2 spaces per dwelling and 6
2 spaces per dwelling plus 6
guest spaces
guest spaces (18 total spaces)
Access
No vehicular access from Grand
Access from Grand Avenue
Avenue
(VAR No. 03 -04 required)
Residential development in the Medium Manufacturing Zone of the Smoky Hollow
Specific Plan is allowed through the MDR Overlay Zone using the Smoky Hollow Site
Plan Review application. The applicant seeks approval of a Smoky Hollow Site Plan
and related entitlements that would permit activation of the MDR Zone for this project,
which is substantially similar to other multiple - family residential projects that have been
approved east of the property site. The site plan for this project is for construction of
nine "live /work" condominiums and is designed to reflect current zoning standards and
market trends.
023
Access and Internal Circulation
The site plan provides for vehicular access from Grand Avenue. Due to the
configuration of the site, only one access point would be provided on the southeastern
end of the project site off of Grand Avenue. All nine units would be accessed from an
18 foot wide driveway with garage entrances just left of the drive aisle. There would
be two visitor parking stalls located at the end of the driveway entrance and the
remaining visitor parking stalls would be located between units 2 and 3 and units 6 and
7. The driveway would be under private ownership and maintained by the
Homeowners Association (HOA).
Architecture
The proposed project design incorporates contemporary industrial style elements.
Residential units would be clustered in attached linear rows with each unit slightly
offset to distinguish individual units. The architectural theme utilizes metal canopies
that are affixed by a metal chain while the exterior of the buildings would have a stucco
finish. The exterior front doors would be constructed of metal with an elongated
window in the door and a rectangular window above creating an overall industrial look
to the design. The proposed design is consistent with the design guidelines in El
Segundo Municipal Code Section 15 -11 -3. The Smoky Hollow Specific Plan Design
Goals encourage buildings with texture and metal surfaces, buildings with varied wall
articulation, and landscaped areas that enhance the major architectural design
elements through the coordinated use of shrubs, plant material, and lighting elements.
Landscaping
The proposed project would be extensively landscaped both internal to the site and
along the site perimeters. Landscaping would include a complementary combination of
hardscape and plantscape materials. Hardscape elements of the Landscape Plan
include paved pedestrian pathways, treated vehicular entries, and signage. The street
frontages along Grand Avenue would be rimmed with a five -foot wide concrete
sidewalk.
Planting materials would vary depending on location and function of specific
landscaped areas within the site. Site perimeter landscaping along Grand Avenue
would offer a public interface between project units and the public sidewalk.
Lighting
Exterior lighting would be provided to address safety, security, utility and decorative
needs. Recessed wall lights at step locations and along shadowed walkways would
be provided as appropriate to ensure sufficient visibility for pedestrian safety.
Uplighting in landscape areas would serve a multi - purpose role of decorative, security
and safety value. Lighted decorative theme poles would be provided at site entry
points and key pathways. Individual entryways and patio areas would be outfitted with
fixtures per building code requirements. The unit owners would determine final fixture
selections. All exterior lighting serving areas interior to the project site would adhere to
minimum candlepower requirements for typical multi- family housing developments and
v`3V
would be consistent with the City of El Segundo Police Department lighting standards.
To the extent feasible, lighting fixtures would be constructed or treated with corrosive
combative materials that are resistant to exposure of salty ocean air.
Parking
Resident parking would be accommodated by two -stall garages located under each
unit. In addition, a minimum of six visitor parking spaces would be interspersed
throughout the project site and easily accessible to the units.
Recreational Amenities
In total, approximately 12,026 square feet of open space area would be provided on-
site through areas of Private Open Space and Common Open Space. Private patio
areas and rooftop decks would provide private open space. These individual patio and
deck areas would be owned and maintained by the individual unit owners. While
these areas may be individually enclosed and may or may not be landscaped, they
would nonetheless serve as an extension into the common use areas.
Common Open Space throughout the project includes landscaped areas, lawn areas
and promenade and pathways. Lawn areas around the site perimeter setbacks and
along the southwestem edge would provide- passive play areas for residents and pets.
The theme promenade and linking pathways would provide visual relief and
opportunities for aesthetic appreciation and would serve as a place for resident
interaction.
Signage
Project signage would be provided as necessary to identify the development, direct
visitors to units and parking areas, and communicate appropriate safety, privacy and
operational policies.
c) Zone Text Amendment No. 03 -01
The applicant has applied for a Zone Text Amendment that would permit "live/ work"
uses in the MDR Zone. The "live /work" use proposal would be a new definition and
permitted use. The current code does not allow "live /work" as a type of use permitted
in any zone. The proposed amendment would allow residents in the MDR Zone the
right to utilize the "live /work" use as outlined in Table 1 of this text. The applicant has
provided a definition of the "live /work" use and staff has recommended that the
definition be modified in order to address issues such as type of work, number of
employees, signage and other issues that have been outlined (see Table 1).
031.
Table 1 — Permitted Uses in MDR Zone
CURRENT
PROPOSED BY
APPLICANT
PROPOSED BY STAFF
El Segundo Municipal Code
El Segundo Municipal Code
El Segundo Municipal Code
Medium Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
(MDR) Zone Chapter 7
(MDR) Zone Chapter 7
(MDR) Zone Chapter 7
Section 15- 7A- 2
Section 15- 7A- 2
Section 15- 7A- 2
PERMITTED USES: The
PERMITTED USES: The
PERMITTED USES: The
following uses are permitted
following uses are permitted
following uses are permitted
in the MDR Zone:
in the MDR Zone:
in the MDR Zone:
A. Multiple - family
A. Artists' studios and
A. Multiple - family
dwellings including
work space for
dwellings including
condominiums,
artists and artisans,
condominiums,
apartments,
illustrators, painters,
apartments,
townhomes and
sculptors,
townhomes and
small lot detached
photographers, or
small lot detached
housing.
other work activities
housing.
related to fine arts.
B. Other similar uses
B. Live /work uses.
approved by the
B. Office- related
Director of
activities and office-
B. C. Other similar uses
Community,
professional work
approved by the
Economic and
activities, such as
Director of
Development
consultants and
Community,
Services as provided
professional services
Economic and
by Chapter 22 of this
including
Development
Title. (Ord. 1212,11-
architectural,
Services as
16 -1993; amd. Ord.
engineering, and
provided by Chapter
1315, 1 -18- 2000).
industrial design and
22 of this Title.
drafting.
(Ord. 1212,11 -16-
1993; amd. Ord.
1315, 1 -18- 2000).
In addition to the proposed permitted uses in the MDR Zone, the applicant is
requesting that lots with a depth of less than 140 feet provide a minimum front yard
setback of 15 feet from Grand Avenue instead of 30 feet (see Table 2). The provision
would allow the applicant to develop the proposed lot to its fullest potential. The 30
foot front yard setback required in the current code could result in the developer
having to create smaller units and /or possibly reduce the number of units currently
being proposed. The developer would be required to submit a detailed landscape plan
that would create a smooth transition between Grand Avenue and the proposed units.
032
Table 2 — MDR Setbacks
CURRENT
PROPOSED
El Segundo Municipal Code Medium
El Segundo Municipal Code Medium Density
Density Residential (MDR) Zone Chapter
Residential (MDR) Zone Chapter 7 Section
7 Section 15- 7A-4D- 4
15- 7A-4D- 4
Grand Avenue Setback:
Grand Avenue Setback:
Notwithstanding any of the above-
Notwithstanding any of the above - referenced
referenced setbacks, ne Fesid°
setbacks, a thirty foot (30) minimum setback
and work space for artists and artisans,
is required, except that all lots with a depth of
illustrators, painters, sculptors,
by persons in recognized professions such
feet (34= -from the Grand Avenue right of
less than 140' feet may provide a minimum of
fifteen feet (15') from the Grand Avenue right-
way line.
of-way line.
such as consultants and professional
d) Proposed New Live/Work Text
The applicant has proposed a definition of "live /work" to include how the "work" portion
of the residence would be conducted. Staff's recommendations list the applicant's
suggestions, as well as additional guidelines, to ensure that the proposed "live /work"
use would not create an impact to surrounding property owners. Staff believes that a
more restrictive definition would ensure the compatibility of the proposed residential
development with the surrounding industrial and residential uses. Table 3 provides the
proposals by the applicant and staffs recommendation for the "live /work" definition.
Table 3 — Live/Work Definition
APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
STAFF "S RECOMMENDATION
El Segundo Municipal Code Title;
El Segundo Municipal Code Title;
Interpretation; Definitions Chapter 1
Interpretation; Definitions Chapter 1
Section 15- 1- 6
Section 15- 1- 6
Live /Work
"Live Work:
The partial use of a dwelling unit for the
A partial use dwelling units for commercial
following commercial uses: artists studios
uses that are restricted to artists,
craftsmen, photographers, and other fine
and work space for artists and artisans,
art work; professional services conducted
illustrators, painters, sculptors,
by persons in recognized professions such
photographers, or other work activities
as architecture, engineering, and law; and
related to fine arts, office - related activities
and office - professional work activities,
other business activities consisting
such as consultants and professional
principally of services as distinguished
services including architectural and
from handling of commodities. Live/Work
does not include musicians; medical -
engineering and industrial design and
drafting by a resident Medium Density
related services; veterinary services or
Residential Zone (MDR) thereof, which is
animal care services. Live/Work uses are
in addition to the use of the dwelling for
in addition to residential purposes and
residential purposes, in compliance with all
must comply with all the following:
of the following conditions:
A. Uve/Work uses may only be
A. Work activities shall not be open to
located in the Medium Density
walk -in trade or client visits other
Residential (MDR) Zone of the
than by appointment.
Smoky Hollow Specific Plan Area;
0 3
B No one other than a resident of the
unit shall be employed on site,
except that one non - resident
employee may report to work on-
site.
C. Work activity shall be conducted
entirely within the boundaries of the
individual unit.
D. No outdoor storage is permitted
E. Existence of home occupation shall
not be apparent beyond boundaries
of the site
F. No work related noise, vibration,
dust, odors, fumes; smoke, heat,
electrical interference or other
objectionable nuisances shall be
perceptible beyond the walls of the
individual unit.
G. Work activities shall not create
pedestrian or vehicle traffic not
normally associated with residential
occupancy, nor shall the work
activity preempt the required off -
street parking spaces.
No motor vehicle repair, beauty or
barber shop (or other similar
personal service uses), no
manufacturing, fabrication, material
handling, photo development
requiring use of chemicals,
recording studios, music studios,
medical offices (or similar
professional services); no activity
related to animals (such as
veterinary office or boarding /kennel
facility).
Signs- One wall sign shall be
permitted at the entrance to an
individual unit provided that it not
exceed ""square feet and that it
not extend above or out from the
wall, and does not contain any
revolving, fluttering, flashing, or
spinning elements. and subiect to
City requirements for sign permits
B. Live/Work uses cannot be open to
walk -in trade or client visits other
than by appointment;
C Only one employee, other than the
resident, may be employed on -site,
D Work activity must be conducted
entirely within the individual unit;
E. Outdoor storage is not permitted;
F. Live/Work uses cannot generate
hazardous materials or employ
hazardous processes;
G. The Live/Work use cannot be
Publicly observed;
H. Live/Work activities, such as noise,
vibration, dust, odors, fumes,
smoke, heat, electrical interference
or other similar nuisances, cannot
be perceptible beyond the
individual unit;
Live/Work activities cannot
increase pedestrian or vehicle
traffic beyond that ordinarily
associated with residential
occupancy nor can it reduce the
number of required off - street
parking spaces available for
residential use;
One wall sign is permitted at the
entrance of each individual unit.
The wall sign cannot exceed six
square feet and cannot extend
above or out from the wall. Signs
cannot emit sounds, ordor, or
visible matter, such as smoke or
steam. Signage may be lighted
from another source such as
gooseneck lamps. Internally
illuminated and neon signs are not
allowed. Roof top signage is not
allowed within the zone. Signs
cannot contain any revolving,
fluttering, flashing or spinning
elements All signaqe is subject to
City requirements for sign permits."
Other Cities Requirements
Staff contacted five cities that allow "live /work" uses to review the standards they use
to regulate such uses. Two cities require administrative approval, and three required a
Conditional Use Permit. Additionally, staff is aware that "live /work" spaces have also
recently been constructed in Venice and Santa Monica.
Table 4 — Other Cities Requirements
City and Respondent
Requirements
City of Fremont, California
The City of Fremont requires a conditional
use permit for "live /work ". The city has set
limited hours of operation between 8 a.m.
and 8 p.m.
City of Oakland, California
The City of Oakland requires a conditional
use permit for Joint Living and Working
Quarters. The City has a minimum of
1,000 square feet for working quarters.
City of Rohnert Park, California
The City of Rohnert Park requires a
conditional use permit for "live /work ". The
living space shall not be rented separately
from the working space.
City of Santa Ana, California
The City of Santa Ana permits creative arts
uses as a home based business in the
Central Business Artists' Village with an
Administrative Approval.
City of San Rafael, California
The City of San Rafael Code states that at
least one (1) of the residents of the
"live /work" quarters shall be required to
have a business license. Approval for
"live /work" is Administrative and the unit
may not be rented or sold as a commercial
space for a person or persons not living on
the premises, or as a residential space for
a person or persons not working on the
remises.
e) Variance No. 03 -04
Section 15- 7A -4D-4 of the El Segundo Zoning Code states that all new development
along Grand Avenue may not have access from Grand Avenue. The site is land- locked
on the north side by Center Street Middle School, on the east by an 88- condominium
development (Grand Tropez), and to the west by a light industrial building. The
applicant is requesting a variance to utilize one of the existing three driveways as an
access point into the site. The applicant plans to remove two of the existing drive
aisles and curb cuts and maintain one existing curb cut located at the southeast corner
of the site and redesign the drive aisle with decorative pavement. Since the applicant
plans to remove the existing drive aisle, a variance is required to continue to use this
access point from Grand Avenue. Staff has researched the requirements for a
variance and determined that since the existing drive aisle pavement is being
removed, the right to the legal non - conforming structure (the driveway) is abandoned
as well.
io
In accordance with Section 15 -23 -3 of the Zoning Code, the Planning Commission
may grant a variance if all of the following four findings can be met:
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply
generally to the other property or class of use in the same vicinity and
zone.
The property is situated on the north side of Grand Avenue and is surrounded
by Center Street Middle School to the north, an 88 -unit condominium
development to the east, and a light industrial building to the west. There are
no side streets to provide alternative access points. The exceptional
circumstance is that there is no practical access to the site from any other
public right -of -way except Grand Avenue. Most other properties in the MDR
overlay zone with frontage on Grand Avenue are comer lots, which allow for
alternative access from a public side street.
B. That the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question.
The variance to allow access from Grand Avenue would preserve the integrity
of the site. A variance will allow access into the site from Grand Avenue.
Without a variance, the site would be a land- locked parcel, which would deny
substantial property rights. Staff conducted a site visit and determined that the
condominium development (Grand Tropez) just east of the site has access from
Grand Avenue, as do other properties both east and west of the proposed site.
C. That the granting of the Variance will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
Granting the variance to allow driveway access from Grand Avenue will not
affect the public welfare or safety. The proposed 18 foot wide driveway allows
sufficient driveway width to accommodate anticipated ingress and egress and
traffic demand. In addition, the 82 foot driveway length is sufficient to
discourage any queuing of vehicles onto Grand Avenue. The site is currently
designed with three driveways off Grand Avenue. Two of these would be
removed. Since the applicant plans to utilize an existing driveway location, it
would not create an impact to the neighboring properties.
D. That the granting of the Variance will not adversely affect the General
Plan.
Granting the variance will not adversely affect the General Plan. The overall
proposal would not result in a change to the present planned use for the area,
as it is consistent with the kind of uses permitted for the zone. The proposed
development is consistent with the Circulation Element of the City's General
Plan and the ESMC and does not constitute a significant or substantial
11 0 3 �:
alteration in planned land uses. Granting the variance for continued use of the
existing driveway /access point located at the southeast comer of the site off of
Grand Avenue would not conflict with the goals of the General Plan.
Planning staff believes that the four required findings for the variance can be made.
V. Inter - Departmental Comments
The project applications, Initial Study Report and plans were circulated and all inter-
departmental comments are attached to the report. The following Divisions and
Departments had no comments on the project: City Manager, Administrative Services,
Library, and the City Attorney's office.
1. The Fire Department commented that the project and building plans would
be reviewed to ensure compliance with the California Fire Code and Uniform
Fire Code before permits would be issued. The Smoky Hollow Specific Plan
Section 15- 11 -2 -G.2 requires that all new developments have an automatic
fire sprinkler system. The Public Works Department commented that
standard traffic mitigation fees are required; that the sewer connections
should be upgraded to facilitate the expected increase in water usage,
handicapped access must be provided, and all work performed in the public
right -of -way requires a permit. The Police Department addressed safety
issues with regard to lighting, addressing, landscaping, hardware (related to
doors and windows), perimeter walls or fencing, common areas, the trash
dumpster, and alarms. The Building Safety Division comments centered on
meeting the 2001 California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical
codes, as well as meeting required egress standards. It was also noted that
grading and drainage plans and a geotechnical report would be required.
These comments have been incorporated as conditions of approval in the
Resolution.
VI. Environmental Review
The proposed project has been analyzed for its environmental impacts and a Drafi
Initial Study (Exhibit D) has been prepared pursuant to Section 15063, of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental
Impacts is proposed for this project pursuant to Section 15070 of CEQA.
VII. Conclusion
Planning staff recommends Planning Commission adopt Resolution No 2549,
recommending that the City Council approve Environmental Assessment No. 608,
Zone Text Amendment No. 03 -01, Subdivision No. 03 -02, Variance No. 03 -04, and
Smoky Hollow Specific Plan Site Plan Review No. 03 -01.
12 0,3111
.7 Fi
VIII. Exhibits
B. Applications
C. Inter - departmental Comments
C PISMS
L-,
Davis, Assistant Planner
L /- /, --,,
James M.garge ire&%br
Community, Economic, and Development Services
P:/ planning &bldgsafety /projects/600- 625/Ea -608 SR
13 038
Community, Economic and
Development Services Department
APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION
HE (�E 0 WED
DIVISON
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
(310) 524 -2344
FAX (310) 322 -4167
www.eisegundo.org
PROJECT No. (vOg� S 63 - D2, S r 7 s 3 - 1 1
Date: 2- :�>
The applicant:
ALBERT L. MARCO 201 Nevada Street, E1 Segundo 90245 310/615 -0694
Name Address Phone
(Check One)
Owner XX Lessee Agent
Property Owner:
Same as above
Name
Address
Phone
Property Situated at: Lots 100 & 1010 Block 1230 El SPQimcin Tract
(Exact legal description. Provide attachment if necessary)
General
Location: 1225 East Grand Avenue between Nevada Street & Oregon Street
Address and Street, Avenue Street, Avenue
Existing Zoning. MDR
Tentative Parcel Map Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
Tentative Tract Map XX Vesting Tentative Tract Map 54134
Final Tract Map Final Vesting Tract Map
Request: Under the provisions of Title 14 of the Municipal Code, application for consideration of a Subdivision
for the above described property.
EA-,A'!A'16 stf$ 03,0 .
S�{SP 03•{ 13 3
SUBMIT WITH THIS APPLICATION:
13 copies of the above noted map(s) prepared in accordance with Title 14, "El Segundo Municipal Code ".
Supporting documents or drawings to illustrate the proposed subdivision (parcel) map as fully as possible
Other information as may be required by the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services or City
Engineer.
MISCELLANEOUS:
All deeds required shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder, Los Angeles, California.
Provide the City with one reproducible myiar copy of the map(s) after recordation in the County Recorder's office
together with two prints of the same.
All maps to be submitted in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code.
OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT
I, We ALBERT L. MARCO the undersigned, depose and say that I/We
am the OWNER(S) of the property involved in this application and that I /we have familiarized myself (ourselves) with
the rules and regulation of the City of El Segundo with respect to preparing and filing this application and that the
foregoing statements herein contained and the information on all documents and all plans attached hereto are in all
respects true and correct to the best of my /oy�4 edge d belief.
I hereby autho
application. orresp ond I u
and c
Owner's Signature
ignature
AUTHORIZATION
October 22, 2002
Date
JOYCE FLOOD and ELIZABEIH SROUR
to act for me /us in all matters relevant to this
tand th t this person will be the exclusive contact on the project and will be sent all information
2
'AG
AGENT AFFIDAVIT
I, We ELIZABEIH SROUR the undersigned, depose and say that Me
am the AGENT(S) of the property involved in this application and that I /we have familiarized myself (ourselves) with
the rules and regulation of the City of El Segundo with respect to preparing and filing this application and that the
foregoing statements herein contained and the information on all documents and all plans, attached hereto are in all
respects true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief.
Procedures for filing application
2
3
4
5
6
I - (P — , 20 O
gnature I Date
File application properly completed in the office of the Planning Division along with completed Initial Study
Applicant Questionnaire. Signature of the owner/ owners, lessee (if applicant), and /or agent shall be
required on all applications.
Applicant shall provide all information, drawings and other materials as requested by the Planning Division
as indicated on the Notice to Applicants.
Pay filing fee (See fee schedule).
Applicant and affected property owners will be notified of time of hearing.
Applicant must be present at the hearing and may offer additional evidence to support his /her request.
There shall be an additional fee for filing an appeal.
Planning Staff: Date received
Signature
Pt phs(a R[onnsfsubdrvnaon
EA
SUB
3 C? 41
Community, Economic and
Development Services Department
APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE
PROJECT No. O 3 - 024
350 Main Street
EI Segundo, CA 90245
(310) 524 -2344
FAX (310) 322 -4167
Date: 4 " 0 — 03
The applicant:
ATAERT T._ MARrn 701 NPVada 4treet , F.1 gPgjmdn 90245 110/615 -1 R1 A
Name Address Phone
(Check One)
Owner YY Lessee Agent
Property Owner:
SAME AS ABOVE -
Name Address Phone
Property Situated at: LOTS 100 & 101, BLACK 123, EL SEGUNDO TRACT
(Exact legal description. Provide attachment if necessary)
General
Location: 1225 EAST GRAND between Nevada & Oregon
Address and Street, Avenue Street, Avenue
Existing Zoning: MDR
Request: Under the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 23-3 of the Municipal Code, application for consideration of a
Variance for the above described property.
Explain in detail wherein your case conforms to each of the following requirements:
That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions including size, shape, topography,
location, or surroundings applicable to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or
class of use in the same vicinity and zone;
PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT FOR RESPONSE TO THESE ITEMS
2 That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the
applicant possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property in
question
That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the
property or improvement in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located
PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT FOR RESPONSE TO THESE ITEMS
4 That the granting of the variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive general plan
NOTE: Any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby
authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privilege not shared by other properties in the vicinity
and zone in which the property is located.
OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE /OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT
I , We the undersigned, depose and say that I/We am
the OWNER(S) of the property involved in this application and that Itwe have familiarized myself (ourselves) with the
rules and regulation of the City of El Segundo with respect to preparing and filing this application and that the
foregoing statements herein contained and the information on all documents and all plans attached hereto are in all
respects true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief.
April 24, 200320
Signature Date
REPRESENTATIVE-FOR ALBERT L. MARCO,- PROPERTY OWNER & APPLICANT
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize to actfor me /us in all matters relevantto this application. I
understand that this person will be the exclusive contact on the project and will be sent all information and
correspondence
Owner's Signature
AGENT AFFIDAVIT
1, We ELIZABETH SROUR the undersigned, depose and say that I/We am
the AGENT(S) of the property involved in this application and that I/we have familiarized myself (ourselves) with the
2
0 4
rules and regulation of the City of El Segundo with respect to preparing and filing this application and that the
foregoing statements herein contained and the information on all documents and all plans, attached hereto are in all
respects true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief
Jr� April 24, 209
ig atur Date
Procedures for filing application
File application properly completed in the office of the Planning Division. Signature of the owner, owners,
lessee, and/or agent shall be provided
2. Applicant shall provide all information, drawings and other materials as requested by the Planning Division.
3. Pay filing fee.
4 Applicant and affected property owners will be notified of time of hearing.
5. Applicant must be present at the hearing and may offer additional evidence to support his /her request.
6. There shall be an additional fee for filing an appeal.
Planning Staff: Date received
Signature
E.A.
VAR.
VARAPP
,� 4 z
ATTACHMF -NT TO VARIANCE APPLICATION
FOR DRIVEWAY ACCESS FROM GRAND AVENUE
1225 EAST GRAND AVENUE, EL SEGUNDO
Apnl 24, 2003
1 The purpose of the variance request is to allow a driveway curb cut on Grand Avenue
The property is situated on the north side of Grand Avenue and is surrounded on three sides by
private property and a school site There is no vehicular or pedestrian access to the site except
from Grand Avenue The exceptional circumstance is based on the fact that there is no access
except from Grand Avenue
2 The variance is necessary to allow use and development of the property Without
driveway access from Grand Avenue, there is no way to gain access to the subject site or
exercise permitted development rights
3. Granting of the variance to allow driveway access from Grand Avenue will not be
detrimental to the public welfare nor will it compromise public safety. The proposed driveway
plan allows sufficient driveway width to accommodate anticipated ingress and egress traffic
demand In addition, the driveway length is sufficient to discourage any queuing of vehicles
onto Grand Avenue The garages and motor court are located within the development and will
not result in any conflict with existing traffic flow on Grand Avenue. In addition, pedestrian
access to the units is separated from the driveway and thus there will be no conflict between
pedestrian and vehicular patterns
4 The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the General Plan The over all
proposal will not result in a change to the present planned use for the area, as it is consistent with
the kinds of uses permitted for this zoning designation. The proposed development is consistent
with the Citv's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and does not constitute a significant or
substantial alteration in planned land uses, and the driveway location does not introduce any
conflict with the goals of the General Plan.
P'D 4T.4. \VORP ' -Dre EL SEvLR:DO 1=1_ � e gwd a-�anance doc
J4 'L'-)
-$13.2-0
COMMUNITY, ECONOMIC AND
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 350 Main street
El Segundo, CA 90245
(310) 524 -2344
FAX (310) 322 -4167
APPLICATION FOR A ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT
PROJECT N0.�"H�'
Date: 7
The Applicant:
ALBERT L. MARCO 201 NEVADA STREET 310/615 -1818
Name Address Phone
(Check One
Owner Ma_ Lessee Agent
Property Owner:
SAME AS ABOVE
Name Address Phone
Property Situated at: LOTS 100 & 101, BLOCK 123, EL SEGUNDO TRACT
(Exact legal description. Provide attachment if necessary)
General
Location: 1225 EAST GRAND AVENUE
Address and Street, Avenue
between Nevada and Oregon Streets
Street, Avenue
Existing Zoning: MDR ( SMOKY HOLLOW SPECIFIC PLAN AREA)
Request: Under the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 26 of the Municipal Code, application for consideration
of a Zone Text Amendment for the above described property.
1. Does public necessity require the proposed amendment? Describe the nature of the proposed amendment,
including the section(s) of the Municipal Code to be amended.
PLEASE SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE FOR RESPONSE TO ITEMS 1 & 2.
�E CLz,� E °MAD
APR 7 zoo
PLANNING DIVISION
2 Would the changes proposed by the amendment be detrimental in any way to the surrounding property?
(Explain reasons supporting your answers.)
�� r
Procedures for filing application
1. File application properly completed in the office of the Planning Division Signature of the owner, owners,
lessee, and /or agent shall be notarized before a Notary Public
2. Applicant shall provide all information, drawings and other materials as requested bythe Planning Division,
3 Pay filing fee.
4. Applicant and affected property owners will be notified of time of hearing
5. Applicant must be present at the hearing and may offer additional evidence to support his /her request
6. There shall be an additional fee for filing an appeal.
ZTA APP
Planning Staff: Date received EA
Signature ZTA
3
0 4 'j-1
I, We
ALBERT L. MARCO
OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT
am the OWNER(S) of the property involved in this applic and tf
with the rules and regulation of the City of El Segurnowledge th respect to
the foregoing statements herein contained and the ation on do
all respects true and correct to the best of my /our and be
S1
being duly swom dispose and say that I/We
/we have familiarized myself (ourselves)
r paring and filing this application and that
ents and all plans attached hereto are in
March 9 5 0 2003
Date
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) \
County of Los Angeles )ss.
On this �`~' day of W` , 20 b before me, the undersigned Notary Public
in and for said county and State, personally appeared known to
me to be the person whose name subscribe to the within instrument,
and acknowledged to me that he /she executed he same.
=
WITNESS my hand a o I seala.¢ABEHCSROUR
Mb
Commission # 1214302 C�
:C public - Cal'
Notary Public and for said County and state
Los ArQ- �+s
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
I hereby autho 'ze to act forme in all matters relevant to this application. I understand that
this person will the excl a contact on the project and will be sent all information and correspondence.
Owner's Signature
AGENT AFFIDAVIT
1, We ELIZABETH SROUR being duly swom dispose and say that I/We
am the AGENT(S) of the property involved in this application and that I /we have familiarized myself (ourselves) with
the rules and regulation of the City of El Segundo with respect to preparing and filing this application and that the
foregoing statements herein contained and the information on documents and all plans, attached hereto ar3 in all
respects true and correct to the best of my /our 4lnowledge and belief.
Lam_(! March 25, 2003
Signature Date
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
County of Los Angeles )ss.
• On this 25th day of March , ETH
20 03 before me, the undersigned Notary Public
in and for said county and State, personally appeared ELIZAB SROUR known to
me to be the person whose name is subscribedto the within instrument,
and acknowledged to me that he /she executed he same.
W ITNIf.*-- _ an6 "M 8fdfRj%M"* N
Commission # 1324574
i NotaN ;'ubho - California
Los Aigaies county otary Public in and for said County and state
MV Cow. -• Expires Oct 9, 2005
2 1j4 v
DRAFT
TITLE: INTERPRETATION; DEFINITIONS
5 -1 -6
LIVE -WORK USES: The partial use of a dwelling unit for the following commercial uses- artists
studios and work space for artists and artisans, illustrators, painters, sculptors, photographers, or
other work activities related to fine arts, office - related activities and office - professional work activities
such as consultants and professional services including architectural and engineering and industrial
design and drafting by a resident Medium Density Residential (MDR) Zone thereof which is In
addition to the use of the dwelling for residential purposes, in compliance with all of the following
conditions
A. Located in the Medium Density Residential Zone of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan
Area;
B. Work activities may not be open to walk -in trade or client visits other than by
appointment;
C. No one other than a resident of the unit may be employed on site, except that one non-
resident employee may report to work on -site;
D. Work activity must be conducted entirely within the boundaries of the individual unit;
E. No outdoor storage is permitted;
F. Work activities must not generate any hazardous materials, processes or impacts to
adjacent residents:
G. Existence of the business operation must not be apparent beyond boundaries of the
site;
H. No work related noise vibration dust odors fumes smoke heat electrical interference
or other obiectionable nuisances may be perceptible beyond the walls of the individual
unit;
I Office - related activities and office - professional work activities, such as consultants and
professional services including architectural and engineering and industrial design and
drafting:
J Work activities must not create pedestrian or vehicle traffic not normally associated with
residential occupancy, nor may the work activity preempt the required off - street parking
spaces:
K. No motor vehicle repair, beauty or barber shop (or other similar personal service uses),
no manufacturing, fabrication, material handling, photo development requiring use of
chemicals recording studios, music studios, medical offices (or similar professional
services); no activity related to animals (such as veterinary office or boarding /kennel
facility) are permitted;
PAPlarnng & Budding Safety\PROJECTS \600- 625\EA60$.14rT I
Val
DRAFT
L. Signs - one wall sign may be permitted at the entrance to an individual unit and that it
not exceed six square feet and that it not extend above or out from the wall. Signs must
not emit sounds, order, or visible matter, such as smoke or steam. Signage may be
lighted from another source such as gooseneck lamps. Internally illuminated and neon
signs are not be allowed. Roof top slgnage may not be allowed within the zone. Sign
may not contain any revolving, fluttering, flashing or spinning elements. All signage is
subiect to City requirements for sign permits.
15 -7A -2: PERMITTED USES: The following uses are permitted in the MDR Zone:
A. Multiple - family dwellings including condominiums, apartments, townhomes and small lot
detached housing.
B. Live /work Uses.
4. C Other similar uses approved b y the Director of Community, Economic and Development
Services as provided by Chapter 22 of this Title. (Ord. 1212,11 -16 -1993; amd. Ord. 1315, 1 -18 -2000)
15 -7A-4: SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
D. Setbacks;
Front Yard: Fifteen feet (15') minimum, except that all lots over eighty feet (80') in depth shall
provide a minimum of twenty feet (20'). (Ord. 1212, 11 -16 -1993)
2. Side Yard: Ten percent (10 %) of the width of the lot on each side of the lot, but shall never be
less than three feet (3') and need not be more than five feet (5'), except if parking garages or
covered parking spaces are located in a side yard and face a street, then the setback shall be
twenty feet (20'). (Ord. 1288, 10 -20 -1998)
3. Rear Yard: A minimum often feet (10') shall be provided.
4. Grand Avenue Setback: Notwithstanding any of the above- referenced setbacks, ^^ Feside^+� ^'
a thirty (30') minimum setback is required,
except that all lots less than 80' feet in depth may provide a minimum of fifteen feet (15') from
the Grand Avenue right of way line.
P \Planing & Budding Safety \PROJECTS \600- 625\EA608.INT
DRAFT
ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT
FRONT YARD SET BACK IN THE MEDIMUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (MDR)
ZONE
PROPOSAL
To approve a Zone Text Amendment for Section 15- 7A -4:D.4 to allow a 15 foot
front yard setback for properties located on the north side of Grand Avenue, in
the MDR Zoning District on lots with a depth of less than 80 feet, provided that a
landscape plan is developed to provide an adequate and creative buffer between
the street face and the proposed residential structures.
Project utilizing the 15 -foot set back along the north side of Grand Avenue would
be required to provide a substantial front yard landscape area for buffering the
structures from the street. The landscaped areas would also provide for
adequate separation of the residential units from street activity.
EXISTING CODE
REVISED CODE
Grand Avenue Setback:
Notwithstanding any of the above-
referenced setbacks, R- fes+deafiat
Grand Avenue Setback:
Notwithstanding any of the above -
referenced setbacks, a thirty foot (30)
minimum setback is required, except
thoFty feet ('301", —from the Grand
Avenue right of way line.
that all lots less than 80' feet in depth
may provide a minimum of fifteen feet
(15') from the Grand Avenue right-of-
way line.
P•\Planmg & Budding Safety\PROJECTS \600 - 625 \EA608.ZTA
COMMENTS:
t All
t n+- `'tc "; �r
nut ,
C �• 1,�j J Q{Mti`
//^�
�/
3�
T_ CL
Ck
` Reviewed By:
CITY KN6nuCrJ:'
Signature an Title
Enclosure:
Site Plan
Date
P \PLANNING & BUILDING SAFEiY\PROJECTS1600- 6251EA- 608utic Ooc
0 542
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
INTER - DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
DATE June 6, 2003
TO Randie Davis
Assistant Planner
FROM Bellur Devaraj r`
City Engineer
SUBJECT 9 Unit Townhouse — 1225 East Grand Avenue
Comments:
1. The development will be subject to a Traffic Mitigation Fee per Council Resolution No. 3969.
2. Grand Avenue frontage to be improved to City standards with new sidewalks and curbs.
Any existing driveways to be abandoned shall be removed and the parkway reconstructed
with full height curb and sidewalk improvements.
3. Water and sewer service connections shall be sized for the proposed use.
4. Any work or encroachment in the public right -of -way shall need a Public Works permit.
BKD:dr
MEW SVtarde Pl
Dan - Aasatent Planner - B Unt
mn
Trnwse - 1225 East Grard Avenue
a
05,-)
COMMENTS:
The Fire Department will require the buildings to have automatic fire sprinkler
protection throughtout, in accordance with E1 Segundo City Cod$, section 15- 11 -2 -G.2
` Reviewed By:
James J. Carver, Principal Fire Prevention Specialist
6/3/03
Signature and Title Date
Enclosure:
Site Plan
P TLANNING 8 BUILDING SAFETYNPROJECTS \600- 6251EA- 608Udc doc
2
05
City of El Segundo
Inter - Departmental Correspondence
May 12, 2003
To: Jim Hansen, Director of Com unity, Economic & Development Services
From: Jack Wayt, Chief of Polic
Subject: Environmental Assessment EA -608, Variance No. 03 -04, Zone Text
Amendment No. 03-01, Smokey Hollow Speck Plan No. 03 -01
and Subdivision No. 03 -02
Address: 1225 E. Grand Avenue, Studio Apartments
Applicant: Albert L. Marco
Property Owner: Albert L. Marco
The Police Department has reviewed EA -608 and returns them with the following comments:
LIGHTING
A maintained minimum of one footcandle of light on the ground surface shall be provided
around all sides of the buildings /units, in the motor court, over the guest parking spaces
and the dumpster, during hours of darkness. Aisles, passageways and recesses
related to and within all sides of the complex shall be illuminated with a maintained
minimum of .25 -.50 footcandles during hours of darkness.
Lighting devices shall be enclosed and protected by weather and vandal resistant
covers.
A PHOTOMETRIC STUDY, WHICH INCLUDES ALL OF THE ABOVE, SHALL
BE PROVIDED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO ISSUING THE PERMIT.
ADDRESSING
Unit and street addressing shall be a minimum of 6" to 8" high, visible from the street, of
contrasting color to the bacKground and illuminated during hours of darkness.
LANDSCAPING
All landscaping shall be low profile around perimeter fencing, windows, doors and
entryways taking special care not to limit visibility and provide climbing access Floral or
grass ground cover is recommended. Bushes shall be trimmed to 1 to 2 feet and away
from buildings. Dense bushes should not be clumped together; this provides a hiding
place for criminal activity. Trees should be trimmed up to 7 feet.
TRASH DUMPSTERS
Trash dumpsters shall be enclosed with a solid wall, wrought iron or steel tubular
fencing. All dumpsters not enclosed this way shall be constructed to fully enclose the
dumpster.
it 5 3
EA — 608/1225 E. Grand
Page two
HARDWARFJDOORS/WINDOWS
All main entry doors, including entry doors from a garage into the residence, shall be of
solid core construction with a minimum thickness of 1 3/4 inches
Entry doors shall have a deadbolt locking device. The deadbolt throw shall have a
1 -inch projection. The cylinder guard shall be of case hardened steel, with the outer
edge angled or tapered and free spinning. The exterior part of the lock shall be
connected to the inside portion of the lock with bolts at least 114 inch in diameter and
constructed of steel. The locking mechanism shall contain a minimum of a 5-pin
tumbler.
Main entry doors with glass constructed in or within 40 inches of the locking mechanism
shall use with polycarbonate materials, fully tempered glass with security mesh
embedded within, or rated burglary resistant glazing.
If the present style of main entry door (glass vision panel in door) is replaced with a solid
door, a panoramic door viewer (180 -190 degrees) shall be installed.
Strike plates shall be made with a minimum 16 U.S. gauge steel, bronze or brass and
secured to the jamb by a minimum of two screws, off -set and which must penetrate at
least 2 inches into solid backing beyond the surface to which the strike plate is attached.
Double or French doors shall have a secondary locking device, such as a cane or flush
bolt in addition to a deadbolt. The inactive leaf of double door(s) shall be equipped with
metal flush bolts having a minimum embedment of 5/8 inch into the head and threshold
of the doorframe.
PERIMETER WALLS OR FENCING
Security gates are noted at the entrance of the driveway and in the common area
between units #4 and #9. Please clarify how these gates will secure.
What type of perimeter walls or fencing will be used to secure the entire property?
(All walls and fencing shall be a minimum height of 6 feet and of solid construction.
Walls shall limit climbing access (i.e. concrete wails shall not have varied sections were
decorative blocks allow for stepping over the wall or part of the wall consists of wrought
iron). Wood, wrought iron, steel tubular or mesh perimeters shall be 6 feet high and all
horizontal members shall be on the inside of the perimeter. Where wrought iron or steel
tubular fencing is used, the horizontal members shall run along the top and bottom
portion of the fence. Wrought iron or steel tubular fencing is always recommended
around a perimeter as it provides maximum visibility.)
TRAFFIC DIV/SION (SGT, ROGER STEPHENSON)
No concerns.
0 5 CJ
zi
4404�
` Reviewed By:
Sig ur Id Title
Enclosure:
Site Plan
✓� J I
r=
2
.ZS7XS �
D to
P 1PLANNING & BUILDING SAFETYIPROJECTS1600- 625 \EA- 60B \jtic tloc
`�hhr1
V V If
i
1 , City of El Segundo
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY,
• ECONOMIC, AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
BACKGROUND
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT No. EA -608, SUB 03 -02, SHSP 03 -01, VAR 03- 04
Project Title: Nine Unit Live/Work — Townhouse Condominiums
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
(310) 322 -4670
FAX (310) 322 -4167
www.elsegundo.org
Lead Agency Name and Address: City of El Sequndo, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA 90245
Contact Person and Phone Number: Randie Davis. Assistant Planner. (310) 524 -2343.
Project Location: 1225 East Grand Avenue, El Segundo, CA 90245
Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Albert L. Marco 201 Nevada Street, El Segundo CA 90245
General Plan Designation: Smoky Hollow Specific Plan
Zoning: Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of
the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach
additional sheets if necessary)
The applicant proposes a medium density residential development consisting of 9 townhouse style
live /work condominium units. A total of 18,770 square feet of residential buildings including garage area
are proposed on a 21,849.16 square foot lot. Individual residential units will be constructed as two- stories
with over the garage /work area. Each unit will also be equipped with roof top decks. Units will be
attached and constructed in a "U" shape design
The project includes a Zone Text Amendment (ZTA 03 -01) to modify the required Grand Avenue setback
from 30 feet to 15 feet. The applicant also proposes to amend the permitted use section of the Medium
Density Residential Zone (MDR) zone to permit Live/Work as a permitted use The applicant also
proposes amending the definition of a home occupation to expand the types of business activities that
could take place in a multi- family dwelling in the MDR Zone
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings)
Surrounding uses to the north of the project site include a Middle School (Center Street Middle School).
The property to the immediate east is an 88 unit townhouse project (Grand Tropez) that fronts along East
Grand Avenue. The properties to the south and west are single -story light manufacturing buildings.
The City of El Segundo is located in the Los Angeles urban area and is considered part of the
Airport/South Bay subregion The City of El Segundo is situated between Los Angeles International
Airport to the north, the City of Los Angeles Hyperion Wastewater Treatment Plant and Department of
Water and Power Scattergood Generating Station and the Pacific Ocean to the west, the Chevron oil
refinery and the City of Manhattan Beach to the south, and Del Aire (a Los Angeles County island) and
the City of Hawthorne to the east
U5�
10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required (e.g., permits, financing approval,
agreement.) P . orpan�c�pat�on
None
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below ( X ) would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following
pages.
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this Initial Study of Environmental Impact, the Planning Commission of the City of El
Segundo finds the following:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
Aesthetics
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
Public Services
not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed
Agricultural Resources
to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
Hydrology/Water Quality
1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
Recreation
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Air Quality
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potential significant impact" or "potentially significant
Land Use /Planning
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately
Transportation/Traffic
analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed
Biological Resources
by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
Mineral Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to
Utilities /Service Systems
be addressed.
Cultural Resources
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because
Noise
all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
Mandatory Findings of
Significance
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
Geology /Soils
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
Population /Housing
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this Initial Study of Environmental Impact, the Planning Commission of the City of El
Segundo finds the following:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed
X
to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potential significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately
analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed
by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to
be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because
all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
James M Hansen,
Director of Community, Economic and Development Services;
and, Secretary of the Planning Commission
City of El Segundo
3
V3,910J)
Date
IV. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the
information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question A "No Impact" answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects
like the one involved (e.g the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be
explained where it is based on project- specific factors as well as general standards (e.g the project will not
expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project- specific screening analysis)
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as
well as project- level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers
must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than
significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be
significant if there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an
EIR is required
4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact "
The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less
than significant level (mitigation measures from Section 17, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross - referenced).
5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3) (d). in this case, a
brief discussion should identify the following:
(a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
(b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of
and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
(c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the
extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential
impacts (e.g general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should,
where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached,' and other sources used or individuals
contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should
normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in
whatever format is selected.
9) The analysis of each issue should identify. (a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each
question, and (b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance
J61
4
Issues and Supporting Information
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
Potentin. , Less than Less Than No Impact
Significant Significant Significant
Impact With Impact
Mitigation
a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vistas X
No scenic vistas exist within this area of the City of El Segundo No mitigation Is required
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to
trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic
X
hi way?
No scenic resources, trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings within a state scenic highway are located within this
area of the City of El Segundo. No mitigation is required.
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site
and its surroundings?
X
The existing visual character and quality of the site and Its surroundings will not be affected, as the site is located in a
built -out, light- manufacturing zone The applicant Is proposing on -site improvements that would promote a more
pedestrian friendly environment such as an increase in landscaping along East Grand Avenue.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely
I
I
I
affect day or nighttime views in the area?
X
The proposal calls for the development of 9 unit townhouse style units with exterior lighting provided for the purpose of
illuminating pedestrian walkways and on -site amenities. All lighting will be positioned to face away from all neighboring
uses and will not cause a significant impact on surrounding neighbors. The proposed project design utilizes low -
intensity exterior lighting, which has been designed and directed to minimize Intrusive effects to adjacent residential
uses. Furthermore, all exterior lighting will be provided to address safety, security, utility and decorative needs, and in
accordance with an approved Lighting and Photometric Study. The site will have a less than significant Impacts on
substantial light or glare to surrounding properties.
2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether Impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to
the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California
X
Resources Agency to non-agricultural use?
The facility Is located in a built -out manufacturing zone. No farmland exists. No mitigation is required.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
I
I
I
contract?
X
The City of El Segundo has no sites zoned foragricultural use. No miti ation Is re uired.
c) Involve other changes In the existing environment which, due to their
location or nature, could result In conversion of Farmland, to non-
X
agricultural use?
There are no agriculturally zoned sites In the City of El Segundo. No mitigation Is required.
3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct Implementation of the applicable air quality
Ian?
X
The site is located within the regional non - attainment area as defined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) The project size Is significantly below the
construction and operational significance thresholds defined in the SCAQMD Air Quality Handbook Operations at the
site will not significantly alter the quality of the air in the area The project will have a less than a significant impact on
air quality
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing
I
I
or projected air quality violation
X
64-
Potentt4, , Less tnan Less Than Tvo 1
Issues and Supporting Information mpac.
Significant Significant Significant T
impact With I Impact
Mitigation
incorporated
A significant effect related to air quality could occur if the proposed project were to generate air emissions during
construction or operations that could affect sensitive receptors The SCAQMD, in its Air Quality Handbook, has
established screening thresholds for determining whether a project has the potential to result in significant air quality
impacts According to Table 6 -2 of the SCAQMD Air Quality Handbook, a potentially significant air quality impact may
occur if a condominium project has more the 297 units. Since the proposed project would have 9 unit townhouse style
livetwork units, no significant air quality impacts related to operation of the proposed project would occur. According to
Table 6 -3 of the SCAQMD Air Quality Handbook, a potentially significant construction air quality impact could occur if a
' condominium project is larger than 1,455,000 square feet. Since the proposed project would be smaller (10,195 square
feet) than these thresholds, no significant impacts related to construction air quality would occur Air quality impacts of
the proposed project would be below SCAQMD significance thresholds and would be less than significant. No
mitigation is required
i c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including X
releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
j The site is located within the regional non - attainment area as defined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and the SCAQMD. The project size is significantly below the construction and operational significance thresholds
defined in the SCAQMD Air Quality Handbook. Operations at the site will not significantly alter the quality of the air in
the area. Operations at the site will not significantly alter the quality of the air in the area. The project will not
significantly contribute to a cumulative impact. No mitigation is required.
d Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentratrons? X
Operations at the site will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants since this facility will produce no pollutants.
Center Street Middle School, which abuts the project site to the north, is a sensitive receptor. Since the proposed
project is primarily a residential use, which falls below the SCAQMD significance thresholds, the project will not expose
the Center Street Middle School to any pollutants. No mitigation is required.
e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? I I i I X
The construction of a 9 unit townhouse style development will not create any objectionable odors No mitigation is
required
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations,
X
or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
The site is in a built -out urbanized area where no candidate, sensitive, or special status species are known to exist. No
mitigation is required
b) Have a substantially adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies,
I regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S
X
Wildlife Service?
The site is in a built -out urbanized area where noriparian habitat is known to exist No mitigation is required
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as
defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited
to. marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc ) through direct removal, filling,
X
'hvdrolo ical interruption, or other means?
No wetlands exist at the site No mitigation is required
d) interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with established native resident migratory
X
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
The site is not known to contain any migratory corridors or native wildlife ursery sites. No mitigation is required
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological
I
resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinances I
I
X
There are no local policies or ordinances regarding biological resources affecting this site No mitigation is required..
6
Issues and Supporting Information Potenno.. Less than Less Than
Significant I Significant Signrfican-
Impact With Impact
Mrngatron
I Incorporated
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Conservation Community Plan, other approved local, regional,
Impact
X
or state habitat conservation plans j j
This site is not affected by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan, a Natural Conservation Community Plan, or
other habitat conservation plan No mitigation Is required
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project —1
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical
(i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most
resource as defined in Section 15064.5
recent Alquist -Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
X
The project is not expected to produce significant Impacts upon, or result in the alteration or destruction of, any historic
or prehistoric site, building, structure, or object The site was constructed with a concrete foundation and concrete
block for the exterior walls It is a single story building with a fiat roof made of roll composition and was constructed In
1953 for light Industrial use. The building is not a historic resource. No mite ation Is re uired —T
b) Cause a substantial adverse change In the significance of an
X
of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
archaeological resources to Section 15064.5'
X
The site and surrounding areas are fully urbanized and developed environments and further archaeological studies are
not necessary, nor are preservation efforts. No mitigation is required.
c) Directly or Indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or
Three active /potentially active faults are located near the City. This site is exposed to seismic risks dust as other
developments in the vicinity would be, should an earthquake occur along these faults. The effects are mitigated
because all structures will be required to comply with the California Building Code (CBC) relating to seismic safety.
unique geologic features
required
ii Stron seismic ground shaking? X
Three active /potentially active faults are located near the City. This site is exposed to seismic risks just as other
X
No paleontological resources or sites or unique geologic features are known to exist on site or in the area. No
mitigation is required.
d) Disturb any human remains, including those Interred outside of formal
(in) Seismic- related ground failure, including liquefaction? X
The facility will comply with all applicable sections of the California Building Code (CBC) relating to seismic safety
at the time of construction Compliance with the CBC reduces the impacts of fault rupture or ground shaking on the
structure to below a level of significance
cemeteries
Areas prone to landslides typically have steep slopes (15% or more), unstable rock or soil charactenstics, or other
geologic evidence of instability As this site does not have slopes that are greater than 15 %, and no known unique
geologic or physical features exist on the site, no impacts are anticipated No mite ation is re uired
X
No human remains, burial sites, or cemeteries are known to exist on site or in the area. No mitigation is required.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project.
a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death Involvin
(i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist -Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence
X
of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42
Three active /potentially active faults are located near the City. This site is exposed to seismic risks dust as other
developments in the vicinity would be, should an earthquake occur along these faults. The effects are mitigated
because all structures will be required to comply with the California Building Code (CBC) relating to seismic safety.
Compliance with the CBC reduces the impacts of fault rupture to below a level of significance No mitigation is
required
ii Stron seismic ground shaking? X
Three active /potentially active faults are located near the City. This site is exposed to seismic risks just as other
i developments in the vicinity would be, should an earthquake occur along these faults. These effects are mitigated
because the structure will be required to comply with the California Building Code (CBC) relating to seismic safety.
Compliance with the CBC reduces the Impacts of ground shaking to below a level of significance. No mitigation is
required
(in) Seismic- related ground failure, including liquefaction? X
The facility will comply with all applicable sections of the California Building Code (CBC) relating to seismic safety
at the time of construction Compliance with the CBC reduces the impacts of fault rupture or ground shaking on the
structure to below a level of significance
(iv) Landslides? X
Areas prone to landslides typically have steep slopes (15% or more), unstable rock or soil charactenstics, or other
geologic evidence of instability As this site does not have slopes that are greater than 15 %, and no known unique
geologic or physical features exist on the site, no impacts are anticipated No mite ation is re uired
(b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X
The proposed project will not Involve any excavation or fill The site is completely paved currently so no topsoil is
exposed No mitigation is required
(c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-
7 U6
Issues and Supporting Information Potenha.., Less than Less Than ; No Impac,,
Significant Significant Significan-
Impact With I impact
Mitigation
- Incotporated -
or otf -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquetaction or A
collapse,?
The applicant will be required to submit a geotechnical report to Insure the soil conditions are suitable for construction
No modification or cut and fill will be necessary to accommodate underlying soil conditions See Mitigation Measure
MM - 1
(d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -a -13 of the Uniform
I
1
7
Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or propert
X
Adherence to MM — 1 will insure soil conditions are acceptable for construction The project will have a less than a
significant impact on risks to life or property.
(e) Have sods Incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks
or altemative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not
I
X
available for the disposal of wastewater?
The proposal will not use a septic tank or alternative wastewater disposal system No mitigation is required
7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: _T
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the
routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials?
X
The General Plan Environmental Impact Report indicates that future developments which place residential
development in close proximity to Industrial areas may create a significant impact by exposing those residents to
hazardous materials or risk of upset from Industrial or commercial activity. Implementation of specific programs from
the Petroleum Resources /Hazardous Materials and Waste Program in the Public Safety Element, and policies and
programs of the Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Element would minimize risks by allowing the City to
oversee and monitor the use, handling and transport of hazardous materials and wastes within the City of El Segundo.
Additionally, the Live/Work use, as proposed, prohibits the use of hazardous materials as part of the "work" portion of
the development. The project will have a less than significant impact to the public or on the environment.
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions Involving the
X
likely release of hazardous materials into the environment?
A significant Impact may occur if a proposed project Involves use or disposal of hazardous materials as part of its
routine operations and would have the potential to generate toxic or otherwise hazardous emissions that could
adversely affect sensitive receptors. Uses sensitive to hazardous emissions (i.e., sensitive receptors) In the area
include a 88 unit residential condominium development to the east, light industrial uses to the south and west, and a
middle school to the north of the property. The proposed project will not result in the use of hazardous materials.
Although the presence of asbestos in the aged structures has not been substantiated, the potential for asbestos
remains possible. Overall, the potential exposure of the public to hazardous materials due to the proposed project is
low, but would be greatest durin initial demolition and grading activities. See Mitigation Measure MM - 2
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or
X
proposed school
A significant impact may occur if a proposed project involved the exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards There are no known sources of potential health hazards on the project site or in the immediate
surrounding area Although the presence of asbestos In the aged structures has not been substantiated, the potential
for asbestos remains possible. Overall, the potential exposure of the public to hazardous materials due to the
l proposed project is low, but would be greatest during Initial demolition and grading activities The site abuts an
existing middle school to north, an 88 unit residential condominium development to the east and to the south and west'
li ht industrial uses Implementation of MM - 2 will reduce the potential im act to a level of insi nificance
I d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials
! sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as
a result would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
X
environment?
i This site has not been included on a list of hazardous materials sites and therefore will be of no hazard to the public or
the environment No mitigation is required
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a
plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people
X
residing or working in the project area?
3
Issues and Supporting Information Potent... , Less than I Less Than No Impact
Significant Significant Significant
Impact Wan Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
The project site is located approximately one -mile south of the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) Since t— he
buildings at the highest point is 26 feet tail and not located in the flight path for LAX, there would be no impacts No j
mitigation is reauired
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project
i X
area
The project is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip The project will have a less than a significant impact on
private airstrips
g) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
X
The proposed project will not interfere with any emergency response or evacuation plans. The project will have a less
than a significant impact on emergency responses plans or emergency evacuation pl ans
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to
X
urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands
There are no wildlands in proximity to the site. Therefore there is no associated risk of loss, injury, or death. No
mitigation is required.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X
While ocean waters will be affected by the site's runoff, changes in ocean water quality due to the proposed project
are considered to be insignificant, if not even beneficial and the overall concentrations of pollutants will be diminished
due to more frequent maintenance and a reduction in the volume of runoff and pollutants. The project will be required
to construct pavement, retaining walls and landscaped areas in general on -site to be maintained to prevent future soil
erosion. Because the proposed project will comply with all appropriate City of El Segundo Urban Runoff Pollution
Prevention Controls, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits requirement, and the County's ,
Stormwater Discharge Program policies, and will employ Best Management Practice (BMP) procedures, impacts
related to runoff pollutants will be reduced to less than significant. See Mitigation Measure MM - 3
b) Substantially degrade groundwater supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in
aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g.,
the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level
X
which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been ranted
Development of the proposed project will introduce urban contaminants (i.e., tire wear residue, oil and grease,
fertilizers, etc.) to the project site, thereby resulting in the potential for long -term degradation of accepting surface
waters and ground water quality. Nonetheless, project conditions are anticipated to be an improvement over the
existing on -site urban run -off pollutant conditions. The change from light industrial, including auto - related services, to
residential will eliminate the presence of many chemical contaminants. Adequate drainage and periodic maintenance
and watering of the paved areas, will wash contaminants from the site thereby reducing the opportunity for
contaminants to accumulate to undesirable concentration levels Finally, the overall volume of runoff will be reduced
by the introduction of landscape areas thereby reducing the volume of contaminants entering the storm
drainage/surface water/ groundwater systems See Mitigation Measure MM - 3
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a
manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-
X
site
Development of the proposed Project will alter the drainage and runoff conditions at the project site Proposed
improvements will increase the area of permeable surfaces from those currently observed on -site, thereby changing
the existing absorption rates and runoff volumes Proposed improvements will also recountour the existing grade of
the project site to eliminate on -site ponding and redirect stormwater flows to adjacent streets and ultimately the
stormwater collection system. These changes are expected to be beneficial both to stormwater flood conditions and
I for water quality The project will have a less than a sionificant impact on drainage pattern of the site or area
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, or 1, '1 i
Issues and Supporting Information potent,°.., I Less than Less Than No Impac,
Significant Significant Significant
impact With lmpac: I
Mitigation
I Incoroonted I
substantially Increase the rate or surface runott in a manner which
I X
would result in flooding on- or off sites
I
The project site will have minor pavement, extensive landscaping and covered by structures, surface flows will be
absorbed on -site as well as being redirected to adjacent streets and ultimately the stormwater collection system
Proposed Improvements will also recountour the existing grade of the project site to eliminate on -site ponding and
Instead drain off -site onto adjacent streets and eventually to storm drains outletting to the Pacific Ocean. Surface run-
off rates would be decreased due to the increase in landscape The project will have a less than a significant impact
on existing drainage patterns No mitigation is required
e) Create or contribute runoff which would exceed the capacity of existing I
or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial { X
additional sources of polluted runoff?
Introduction of a substantial area of landscaping will both reduce the volume of site runoff through the provision of
permeable surface area and enhance water quality by replacing industrial uses with generally "cleaner" residential
uses and landscaped areas. The project will have a less than a significant impact on runoffs. No mitigation is
required.
f Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X
While ocean waters will be affected by the site's runoff, changes in ocean water quality due to the proposed project are
considered to be insignificant, if not even beneficial and the overall concentrations of pollutants will be diminished due
to more frequent maintenance and a reduction in the volume of runoff and pollutants. Mitigation Measure - 3 requires
that pavement, retaining walls and landscaped areas in general on -site be maintained to prevent future soil erosion.
Because the proposed project will comply with all appropriate City of El Segundo Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention
Controls, NPDES Permits requirement, and the County's Stormwater Discharge Program policies, and will employ
BMP procedures, impacts related to runoff pollutants will be reduced to less than significant. See Mitigation Measure
MM-3
g) Place housing within a 100 -year floodplain, as mapped on a federal
Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood
X
hazard delineation ma
According to Exhibit PS -2 contained in the Public Safety Element of the City's General Plan, El Segundo is not at risk
from flooding dunng a 100 -year storm since there are no dams or waterways located near the City. Localized flooding
during periods of heavy rainfall may occur but this would be due to the inadequacy of storm drains, therefore, the risk
of flooding or other water related hazards on the site is considered remote and no impacts are anticipated. No
mitigation is required
h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would
impede or redirect flood flows?
1
1 X
According to Exhibit PS -2 contained in the Public Safety Element of the City's General Plan, El Segundo is not at risk
from flooding during a 100 -year storm since there are no dams or waterways located near the City. Localized flooding
during periods of heavy rainfall may occur but this would be due to the inadequacy of storm drains, therefore, the risk
of flooding or other water related hazards on the site is considered remote and no impacts are anticipated. No
mitigation is required
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, Injury or death
involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee
X
or dam?
There are no dams or levees located near the City, therefore no associated risk of loss, Injury, or death as a result of
them flooding is expected No mitigation Is required. '
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X
According to the Public Safety Element of the City's General Plan, the southwestern portion of the City along the coast
(and adjacent portions of the City of Los Angeles to the north) are identified as seiche and tsunami hazard areas
However, since the site is not located in these areas, no impacts due to these natural hazards are anticipated As the
project vicinity is currently developed there will be no change in the risks associated with land subsidence, the potential
for landslides, or mudflows No mitigation is required
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the project-
I a) Physically divide an established community? I I J X I I
10 - r•1
�Jb i
Issues and Supporting Informatiou
Potenn.. .
Significant
Less than
Significant
Less Than No lmpac:
Significant
Impact
With
Impact
{
Mitigation
Incorporated
Approval and development of the proposed Project will bring a consistency and continuity of residential uses which
reflects the tiered density approach outlined by the General Plan and Smoky Holly Specific Plan Development of the
proposed project eliminates a division of the neighborhood and would enhance land use compatibility Therefore, land
use issues are less than significant The project will have a less than a significant impact on physically dividing and
established community No mitigation is required
b) Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an
I
agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the
general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
X
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
The proposed project meets or exceeds all of the development standards required by the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan
and the General Plan except setbacks. A Zone Text Amendment No 09 -01 is proposed to modify the setbacks In
accordance with the development standards, the project represents compatible land use planning in relationship to
adjacent land uses, arterial streets and overall locational requirements. The project site represents a transitional land
use area amongst established residential uses and older industrial /commercial uses, which are being phased out at
this interface. No mitigation is required.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural
I
I
I
communities conservation plan?
X
No habitat conservation plans or natural communities conservation plans exist for the site. No mitigation is required.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would
be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
X
There are no known mineral resources in the project vicinity. The General Plan EIR determined that the loss or partial
loss of access to mineral resources, particularly petroleum resources, is less than significant impact. No mitigation is
required
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other
X
land use plan?
No locally - important mineral resource recovery sites have been delineated in the General Plan, Specific Plan, or other
Land Use Plan for the area. No mitigation is required
11. NOISE. Would the project result in
i a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or
X
applicable standards of other agencies?
Construction activities will temporarily elevate ambient noise levels. The City's Noise Ordinance limits construction
activity to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. No construction is permitted on
Sundays or holidays. The Noise Ordinance provides that when temporary increase in noise (i.e., due to construction)
exceed noise standards, but are conducted within the operational hours established by the ordinance, impacts are
acceptable. Hence, temporary noise increase generated by construction activity are less than significant No
mitigation is required
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome
vibration or groundborne noise levels
X
Construction activity will temporarily elevate noise ambient noise levels Implementation of Noise Element policies
N11 4 through N11.9 and N21 1 and N31 1 would minimize these to less than significant impacts. No mitigation is
reouired
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project
I vicinity above levels existing without the project? I I X
Construction activity will temporarily elevate noise ambient noise levels. Implementation of Noise Element policies
i N11 4 through N11.9 and N21 1 and N31 1 would minimize these to less than significant impacts No mitigation is
reouired
d) A substantially temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in
_ the project vicinity above levels existing without the projects I I X
11 ()68
Issues and Supporting Informatiou
Fotenti.., less than Less Than I No Impac;
Significant Significant I Significant
Impact With Impact
IMitigation I
Construction activities will temporarily elevate ambient noise levels The City's Noise Ordinance limits construction
j activity to between the hours of 7.00 a.m to 6.00 p.m , Monday through Saturday No construction is permitted on
Sundays or holidays The Noise Ordinance provides that when temporary increase in noise (i.e , due to construction)
exceed noise standards, but are conducted within the operational hours established by the ordinance, impacts are
j acceptable Hence, temporary noise increase generated by construction activity are less than significant No j
mitigation is required
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or, where such a
plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public
X
use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels'?
The project site is locates approximately one -mile south of LAX According to the Noise Element of the General Plan,
the project site is located in the 60 decibel Community Noise Elevation Level (CNEL) Zone. Noise from LAX generally
does not create impacts in the 60 CNEL Zone The project will have a less than a significant impact on airport land
use No mitigation is required
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project
expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive
X
noise levels?
No private airstrips are located in the vicinity of the project. No mitigation is required.
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for
X
example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)'?
Construction of the residential units will assist the City of El Segundo in meeting an existing demand for housing and
reducing a deficit in the City's housing stock. The General Plan EiR further concluded that implementation of the
General Plan EIR mitigation measures 4.5 -1, 4.5 -3 and 4.5 -5 would adequately address citywide and regional impact
issues related to the availability of affordable housing and maintenance of an effective fobs /housing balance and
therebv reduce effects to less than significant impacts. No mitigation is required.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the
_T
construction of replacement housing elsewhere
X
Construction of the residential units will assist the City of El Segundo in meeting an existing demand for housing and
reducing a deficit in the City's jobs/housing balance No housing is being demolished No mitigation is required.
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction
of replacement housing elsewhere?
X
No housing currently exists on -site. No mitigation is re uired
13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision
of new or physically altered government facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
res once times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a Fire protection? i I I X
The proposed project will increase the localized population by approximately 18 residents A significant impact may
occur if the City of El Segundo Fire Department (ESFD) could not adequately serve the proposed project based upon
response time, access or fire hydrant/water availability The proposed project site is served by two fire stations; the
Headquarters Station, located at 314 Main Street and Station 2, located at 2161 East El Segundo Boulevard
Headquarter Station has two engine companies and a rescue team Station 2 has an engine company, rescue team;
and a truck company Existing staffing levels are not expected to be adversely impacted by the proposed project The
proposed project would have less than significant impacts on fire service No mitigation is required
b Police protection? i I I X
12
Issues and Supporting Information,
paten,.,- ., h less than Less Than 1vc Impact
Significant I Significant Signtfican:
Impact I with Impact
Mitigatior. II
incorporated
The City of El Segundo requires development project applicants to prepare and submit a lighting plan and photometry
study for review and approval. City review provides the opportunity to ensure that the project lighting demonstrates
compliance with relevant conditions of approval, policies, safety and security considerations, which enhance safety and
minimize the potential for crime A significant impact may occur if a proposed project resulted in an increase in demand
for police services that would exceed the capacity of the police department responsible for serving the site Police
service for the proposed project site is provided by the El Segundo Police Department (ESPD), which is located at 348,
Main Street, in the City of El Segundo The proposed project would increase on -site population, which could generate a
demand for additional security The extent of additional protection needed would vary in accordance with the LiveNvork
use and expected number of visitors on -site The proposed project would have less than significant impacts on polio
service No mitigation is required
c Schools? I I X
The proposed project will increase the localized population by appracimateiy 18 residents (based on average
household size of 2 persons per household). The increase in population will result in minor demand for schools.
Therefore, project impacts related to school facilities are less than significant. No mitigation is required.
d Parks X
The increase in population will result in a minor increase in the usage of parks. The local parks are adequate to
accommodate an increase in population The proposed project would have less than significant impacts on park
service No mitigation is required.
e Other public facilities? X
The proposed project will increase the localized population by approximately 18 residents. The increase in population
will result in the minor increase and incremental demand for fire, police, parks, library and other governmental
services, including schools. Because the project is relatively small in size and represents infill development within
existing service boundaries, the increase in demand for these services is insignificant. The proposed project would
have less than significant impacts on other public facilities. No mitigation is required.
14. RECREATION.
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical
X
deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
The increase in population will result in a minor increase in the usage of parks. The local parks are adequate to
accommodate an increase in population. The proposed project would have less than significant impacts on park
service No mitigation is required
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an
X
adverse physical effect on the environment?
The proposed project does not provided on -site recreational facilities. However, the site does provide open space
areas to be utilized by the residences creating a less than significant impact on recreational facilities. No mitigation is
required
15. TRANS PORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project
a) Cause an increase in the traffic which is substantial in relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a
substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
X
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections
The project site consist of nine units and is anticipated to result in a less the significant impact to existing transportation,
systems and patterns of travel The concept of the proposed development anticipates a live /work residential
environment in which the owner /resident of a unit will work from home. This will reduce the number of vehicle trips to
and from the site The project will have a less than a si nificant impact on traffic No mite ation is required
I b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard
established by the county congestion management agency for
X
designated roads or highways?
The project site consist of a 9 unit townhouse style development and is anticipated to result in a less the significant
impact to existing transportation systems and patterns of travel The concept of the proposed development anticipates
a live /work residential environment in which the owner /resident of a unit will work from home. This will reduce the
number of vehicle trips to and from the site No mitigation is required
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in
I
traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety I
X
13
Issues and Supporting Informatiou
Potentt. 711,s than Less Than ho I>Ttpac;
Significant Stgntfi=t Significant
Impact With i hnpac
Mitigation
I _ nsks?
1 The or000sed orolect will not affect any existing airtraffic patterns No mitigation is required
d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
i
dangerous intersections ) or incompatible uses e. g farm equipment)?
X
There will be no modifications to the existing street pattern No mitigation is required
e Result in inadequate emergency access? I I I X
Emergency access to the site will not be changed No mitigation is required
f Result in inadequate parking capacity? X
The 9 unit townhouse style development will provide adequate on -site parking in the form of 2 -car garages for each
unit and guest parking spaces as required by he El Segundo Municipal Code No mitigation is re uired.
g) Conflict with adopted policies or programs supporting alternative
X
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks
required.
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from
The project does not inhibit or interfere with the adopted alternative transportation plans No mitigation is required.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional
I
I
X
Water Quaky Control Boards
X
The proposed project is subject to the City's Sewer Allocation Ordinance, which limits the generation of City
wastewater generation to the City of Los Angeles' Hyperion treatment plant during any three -month quarter. The
allocation system is based on a "first come, first served" basis, and any development which would be displaced due to
the project allocation would be held until the future quarter. The project site would filter into pump station no. 8 and
even though it has been determined that pump station no. 8 could handle the increase, pump station no. 8 is close to
the maximum load. The increase load could result in an overload. In the City's Sewer Master Plan, Pump Station No.
8 is scheduled to be replaced in order to accommodate current and future volume load creating a less than significant
impact. No mitigation is required.
b) Require or result in construction of new water or wastewater treatment
capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which
X
provider's existing commitments?
X
could cause significant environmental effects?
The proposed project is subject to the City's Sewer Allocation Ordinance which limits the generation of City wastewater
I 1 generation to the City of Los Angeles' Hyperion treatment plant during any three -month quarter. The allocation system
The proposed project is subject to the City's Sewer Allocation Ordinance, which limits the generation of City
wastewater generation to the City of Los Angeles' Hyperion treatment plant during any three -month quarter. The
allocation system is based on a "first come, first served" basis, and any development which would be displaced due to
the Project allocation would be held until the future quarter. No mitigation is required
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which
X
1
could cause significant environmental effects?
The protect site is already paved and has an established drainage pattern that will not be modified. No mitigation is
required.
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded
X
entitlements needed?
1 There are sufficient water supplies available to accommodate adequate water No mite ation is re uired.
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which
services or may serve the project determined that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the
X
provider's existing commitments?
The proposed project is subject to the City's Sewer Allocation Ordinance which limits the generation of City wastewater
I 1 generation to the City of Los Angeles' Hyperion treatment plant during any three -month quarter. The allocation system
is based on a "first come, first served" basis, and any development, which would be displaced due to the project
allocation would be held until the future quarter No mitigation is required
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
i
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? 7
T
X
The project developer will be required to recycle all disposable material whenever possible No mitigation is required
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statues and regulations related to
solid waste?
X
14
;i7
Issues and Supporting Informatiuu
Potent,... Less than j Less Than I ho Impact
Signtficant Significant I Significan;
Impact With i impact
Mitigation
This proposal will comply with all tederal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste No mitigation
is required
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining
I
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or
I
X
eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
The project site Is in an urbanized setting already developed with light Industrial uses The transition of land uses from
Industrial to residential will not effect or substantially reduce fish, wildlife or plant habitats, communities or species
Additionally, the proposed project will not adversely effect or eliminate important examples of major periods of
California history or prehistory. These conclusions are documented In Items 4 and 5 above. Further, as documented
in Items 1 through 16, all potential impacts related to the proposed project will be reduced to Less Than Significant,
thereby avoiding degradation of the environment. No mitigation Is require
b) Does the project have Impacts that are Individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that
the Incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in
X
connection with the effects of the past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
As noted above, all project - related Impacts will be reduced to Less Than Significant. However, project Impacts when
considered with other cumulative development may result in incremental effects which are quantitatively more adverse.
Incremental Impacts are cumulative considerable relative to traffic, public services and utilities. However, the City of El
Segundo has adopted ordinances requiring the payment of fees to mitigate project contributions toward cumulative
Impacts. Funding mitigates any potential cumulative Impacts Including demand for public services or local traffic
Infrastructure capacity.
{ c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
X
indirectly*?
The transition of land uses, which will result, with Implementation of the proposed project will eliminate incompatible
uses in an established area. The proposed project will Improve existing visual and physical conditions as encouraged
by the General Plan. Overall, the change in uses will result in a beneficial effect on humans and the surrounding area.
Mitigation Measures
MM -1 Before the Issuance of a building permit, the applicant must submit a geotechnical report to the City Building
official for review and approval.
MM -2 a) Asbestos and lead -based paint analysis and removal must be performed In conformance with federal,
state and local regulations
b) All activities associated with asbestos must be conducted under the direct supervision of a certified
asbestos consultant
c) Demolition of structures that have asbestos containing materials (ACM) must comply with the South
Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403 - Asbestos Emissions from
Demolition /Renovation Activities.
MM-3 a) During construction and operations, all waste must be disposed of in accordance with all applicable laws
and regulations Toxic wastes must be discarded at a licensed, regulated disposal site by a licensed
waste hauler
b) All leaks, drips and spills occurring during construction must be cleaned up promptly and in compliance
with all applicable laws and regulations to prevent contaminated soil on paved surfaces that can be
washed away into the storm drains f''7
15
i
Issues and Supporting Information Po nific Less than I Less Than I No lmpac;
Significant Significant Stgntfican-
Impact Witt] lmpac;
Mitigation i
L i lncornorated
c) If materials spills occur, they should cleaned up in a way that will not affect the storm drain system
d) The project must comply with the City of EI Segundo Ordinance No 1235 and No 1348, which
establishes storm water and urban pollution controls
e) Before anticipated rainfall, construction dumpsters must be covered with tarps or plastic sheeting.
f) Inspections of the project site before and after storm events must be conducted to determine whether
Best Management Practices have been implemented to reduce pollutant loadings identified in the Storm
Water Prevention Plan
g) The owner or contractor must conduct daily street sweeping and truck wheel cleaning to prevent dirt in
the storm drain system.
h) Storm drain system must be safeguarded at all times during construction.
i) The applicant shall construct pavement, retaining walls and landscaped areas in general on -site to be
maintained in order to prevent future soil erosion.
T
p: \projects \600 - 625 \ea - 608 \initial study
MINUTES OF THE MEETING
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA
JUNE 26, 2003.
Chairman Mahler called the meeting of the El Segundo Planning CALL TO ORDER
Commission to order at 7:00 p.m in the Council Chamber of the City of
El Segundo City Hall, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, California.
Commissioner Funk led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PLEDGE TO FLAG
PRESENT: BUSCH, FRICK, FUNK, MAHLER, MILLER SHEEHAN ROLL CALL
ABSENT: None
Chairman Mahler presented the Consent Calendar. CONSENT
CALENDAR
None. CALL ITEMS
FROM CONSENT
CALENDAR
Vice - Chairman Busch moved, seconded by Commissioner Miller MOTION
Sheehan, to approve the May 22, 2003, Minutes as submitted. Passed
5 -0.
PUBLIC
None. COMMUNICATIONS
WRITTEN
None. COMMUNICATIONS
PUBLIC HEARINGS,
Chairman Mahler presented Item No. H -2, Environmental Assessment NEW BUSINESS,
No. 614 and Subdivision No. 03 -03. Address: 225 Sheldon Street. EA. NO. 614 AND
Applicant: Gregory Lutz. Property Owner: Jack and Allie Curtis. SUBD. NO. 03 -03
Planning Technician Yuan presented staff report related to this matter.
Chairman Mahler opened the public hearing.
Elizabeth Srour, 1001 6tr' Street, Manhattan Beach, representing the
applicants
Ms Srour explained that this project proposal is for a four -unit attached
residential condominium complex that will provide all of the amenities for
a residential environment, such as private entries from a landscaped
El Segundo Planning Commission ,�
Minutes, June 26, 2003 �� 7 1
entry court, private and enclosed two -car garages for each unit, entries
into the units from the garages, and two guest parking spaces for each
unit. She stated that these are modest units in size, ranging from
approximately 1,600 square feet to 1,900 square feet; and highlighted
the traditional layout, with the living area on the lower level and the
bedrooms on the upper level. She indicated that each of the units have
private decks off the lower level living areas and a smaller deck off the
vanity area on the upper level. Ms. Srour stated that the proposal
complies with all of the development standards for this R -3 zone; that
this project is one of the first condominium units in this area — pointing
out her belief that this project will invigorate the neighborhood and
influence new development in the area; and she advised that the
applicant concurs with the conditions of approval.
Ms. Srour noted for Vice - Chairman Busch that she anticipates the
construction will take 10 to 12 months following the completion of the
permit process.
There being no further input, Chairman Mahler closed the public
hearing. _
There was consensus among the Planning Commissioners that the
applicant has met all of the required conditions for a subdivision and that
the zoning standards have been met.
MOTION
Commissioner Frick moved, seconded by Commissioner Funk, to
approve the applicant's request, thus adopting Resolution No. 2548.
Passed 5 -0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS,
Chairman Mahler presented Item No. H -3, Environmental Assessment CONTINUED
No. 608, Subdivision No. 03 -02, Smoky Hollow Site Plan No. 03 -01, BUSINESS, EA NO.
Variance No. 03 -04, and Zone Text Amendment No. 03 -01. Address: 608; SUBD NO. 03-
1225 East Grand Avenue. Applicant and Property Owner: Albert L. 02; SHSP NO. 03 -01:
Marco. VAR NO.03 -04;
ZTA N 0.03 -01
Assistant Planner Davis presented staff report related to this matter.
` Chairman Mahler recused himself from consideration of this matter due
to his residence being adjacent to this project. At this time he departed
the Planning Commission meeting.
Responding to Commissioner Frick's inquiry regarding home occupation
permits, Assistant Planner Davis explained that these residents will have
to abide by the same guidelines /restrictions for the current home
occupation application process and that they will have to abide by the
definitions in the Medium Density Residential Zone; stated that the
El Segundo Planning Commission
Minutes, June 26, 2003
approval will be done
administratively; and that the applicants will be required to obtain a
business license.
Assistant Planner Davis noted for Commissioner Miller Sheehan that
each unit will be able to display a sign for identification of their business,
no larger than six square feet.
Assistant Planner Davis stated for Commissioner Frick that the signs will
be located on the building of their residence; and noted that there
currently are no design standards for the individual signs:"
Assistant City Attorney Berger explained for Commissioner Funk that
part of the resolution will be a recommendation to City Council to amend
the Municipal Code to include this definition that will apply to all future
live -work projects within the Medium Density Residential Zone.
Acting Planning Manager Gary explained for Vice - Chairman Busch that
the Downtown Specific Plan allows for one to have a separate
residential unit on the second floor above a commercial first floor
business, which has to be an owner /tenant occupied unit; and noted that
the concept on Main Street would primarily have the residential unit as
an accessory use, whereas the primary use with this project is a
residential use.
Assistant Planner Davis explained that the live -work concept is a very
marketable trend at this time; stated that this concept will help to
alleviate traffic congestion; and noted that since receiving this proposal,
several other inquiries have been received by staff with regard to live -
work projects in this City.
In response to Commissioner Miller Sheehan's question regarding the
possibility for artists to put on a show to display their work at this site,
Assistant Planner Davis stated that it would have to be done by
appointment only; that if the property owner were to have a party
displaying their works, she suggested that the Planning Commission
might want to consider that the owner obtain a special permit which
would identify certain parameters. Assistant Planner Davis highlighted
the fact that these units are small and that they would not be able to
easily accommodate a large gathering without negatively impacting the
other condominium residents; and noted that only six guest parking
spaces would be available.
Acting Planning Manager Garry pointed out that part of this requirement
is to avoid a retail -type use or service use that would generate retail
El Segundo Planning Cornnnssion J r7 Q
Minutes, June 26. 2003
traffic or walk -in trade
With regard to described uses in the general definition, Assistant City
Attorney Berger explained for Commissioner Funk that the City
Attorney's Office believed that it would be better to highlight those
businesses that would be acceptable versus those that would not
acceptable in this development; and added that the acceptable types of
uses within this project would be more of an artist -type use or
professional service -type use that would not generate vehicular or walk -
in traffic.
Assistant Planner Davis noted for Vice - Chairman Busch -that these units
could be used for residential use only.
Vice - Chairman Busch opened the public hearing.
Elizabeth Srour, 1001 6t' Street, Manhattan Beach, representing the
applicant.
Ms. Srour thanked staff for their professional guidance and assistance
throughout this process; explained that nine residential condominium
units are being proposed — pointing out that the primary use is for
residential; noted that the goal of the applicant is to develop this
property for owner /resident type uses; and stated that this property will
be governed by an association with recorded Covenants, Conditions,
and Restrictions (CC &R's). Ms. Srour explained that the variance is for
the existing driveway access off Grand Avenue; and stated that this is
primarily a residential condominium complex, but that it will allow the
opportunity for home occupation businesses. She commented on the
growing popularity of this live -work concept and its marketability. Ms.
Srour explained that this project is primarily a U- shaped complex with
two separate buildings; and that it is designed with the front four units
facing the street and displaying front entries. She indicated that there
currently are two other driveway access points at this site that will be
closed off; explained that the driveway on Grand Avenue will be 18 -feet
wide, very visible, and will have enough room for the queuing of two
vehicles; and stated that there will be a security gate recessed from the
street. Ms. Srour noted that there will be a 21 -foot setback from the
curb; and explained that this reduced setback is needed because of the
limitations of the lot depth, which Is less than 140 feet — pointing out that
if one were to apply the 30 -foot setback, it would take up to 22.5 percent
of the entire lot area.
Ms. Srour explained that the types of home occupation uses expected
within this development would be self - conducted businesses, ones that
would not negatively Impact the neighbors with increased noise, odors,
4 El Segundo Planning Commission
Minutes, June 26, 2003
J 7 {
lights, electrical interference, and traffic. She expressed her belief that
these units would be perfect for artists, architects, draftsmen, engineers,
lawyers, anything by which the work stems from the person's creativity
without bringing in or selling goods and commodities; and stated that
these businesses shall be operated on an appointment -only basis. She
stated that they should be permitted to have a party /showing, but that
they would have to work within the established parameters. Ms. Srour
stated that the association will have some interest in regulating the
design of the signs; and noted that the applicant has proposed that in
addition to the owner of the unit/business, that only one employee be
permitted to work on site. Ms. Srour expressed her belief that this
project will add value to the community, making it more -compatible with
the concept of a livable community.
Commissioner Funk questioned whether the reflected wording in the text
clearly identifies the distinction between the prohibition of handling of
commodities versus that of a salesperson who works from home.
Ms. Srour explained that there is limited space in these units and that
storage of merchandise or display tables is not permitted.
Joyce Flood, 659 4t' Street, Hermosa Beach, project architect.
Ms. Flood stated that the first floor area for all the units range from 434
square feet to a maximum of 644 square feet, areas that do not easily
accommodate for storage of materials.
Assistant Planner Davis stated that minimal storage of office supplies
would be permitted for one's own use; explained that when an applicant
applies for a home occupation permit, they must provide a description of
their business; and stated that if an applicant violates the provisions of a
permit, their permit/license can be revoked. She added that, if
necessary, the residents within the complex could lodge a complaint
with the City to investigate the business operations. She made the
distinction that one can have an office but not a sales office.
Albert Marco, project applicant.
Mr. Marco thanked staff for their assistance on this project; highlighted
his vision to create a complex that provides an open space feel, such as
a typical artist's loft; and expressed his belief that the owners of these
units will take a lot of pride in this development.
Ms. Flood noted for Vice - Chairman Busch that once commenced, the
construction process should take anywhere from 12 to 14 months.
5 El Segundo Planrung Comnussion
Minutes, June 26, 2003 '� v
In response to Commissioner Funk's question, Mr. Marco stated that he
concurs with the conditions of approval.
With regard to Commissioner Funk's concern with the wording for no
sales of commodities, Mr. Srour suggested adding the words "from
handling commodities on site" to further delineate the definition —
pointing out that the administration of the sales can occur on site, but
that the actual delivery or picking up of items does not occur on site.
There being no further input, Vice - Chairman Busch closed the public
hearing.
Commissioner Miller Sheehan stated that this is a creative concept and
a good way to bring residential use into this area; and stated that it has
the potential to bring in additional culture and creativity into El Segundo.
Commissioner Frick expressed her support of this creative live -work
concept; pointed out that this concept will save some business owners
the expense of renting a storefront; noted that people working from
home alleviates traffic congestion; and expressed her support for the
beautiful design of this building.
Commissioner Funk noted her support for the live -work concept; and
expressed her appreciation for the work put into this project.
Vice - Chairman Busch noted his support for the live -work concept; and
stated that approving this type of concept on a small scale in the MDR
zone only would be beneficial in determining its future success in other
zones throughout the City. He stated that the 15 -foot setback is MOTION
reasonable considering the limited depth of the lot, and he wished the
applicant best wishes in this creative endeavor.
Commissioner Frick moved, seconded by Commissioner Funk, to REPORT FROM
approve the applicant's request, thus adopting Resolution No. 2549. DIRECTOR
Motion carried 4 -0.
Highlighting the status of the Air Force Base proposal, Acting Planning
Manager Garry advised that the city of Hawthorne Planning Commission
voted to recommend approval of all the entitlements for the residential
portions that they would be building in that city; stated that this issue will
be going before the Hawthorne City Council for approval on July 7; that
the El Segundo City Council will review the Final Environmental Impact PLANNING
Report on July 15; and that LAFCO is expected to review the annexation COMMISSIONERS'
application late July or early August. COMMENTS
6 El Segundo Planning Commission
Minutes, June 26, 2003 J'� '
Vice- Chairman Busch wished everyone a happy 4th of July celebration
There being no further discussion, Commissioner Frick moved,�
seconded by Commissioner Funk, to adjourn the meeting at 8:22 p.m. to
the regular meeting of July 10, 2003 Passed 4 -0.
PASSED AND APPROVED ON THIS 24th DAY OF JULY, 2003.
James Hansen, Secretary of
the Planning Commission
and Director of Community,
Economic and Development Services
City of El Segundo, California
ADJOURNMENT
Philip Mahler, Chairman of
the Planning Commission
City of El Segundo, California
El Segundo Planning Cornnussion
Minutes, June 26.2003
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Consideration and possible action regarding adopting an ordinance to
allow the City of Hawthorne to include Area A and B of the Los Angeles Air Force Base
( LAAFB) into Hawthorne Redevelopment Agency (RDA) District No. 2 as part of the financing
mechanisms for the LAAFB modernization project.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Discussion;
2) Introduction and Reading of Ordinance;
3) Schedule second reading and adoption of Ordinance on September 2, 2003;
4) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
On May 6, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1360 to permit the study of the
inclusion of Area A (39 acres at southeast corner of Aviation/El Segundo Boulevards) of the
LAAFB into the Hawthorne RDA District No. 2 as part of the proposed detachment of the
property from the City of El Segundo and the annexation of Area A into the City of Hawthorne.
On May 6, 2003 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1361 to permit the study of the
inclusion of Area B (52 acres at the northwest corner of Aviation/El Segundo Boulevards) of
the LAAFB in the same Hawthorne RDA District No. 2. Area B is not proposed to be annexed
by Hawthorne. Both these actions were undertaken on the premise that inclusion of both Area
A and B into the Hawthorne RDA would assist in closing the funding gap in LAAFB
modernization project.
Subsequent to these actions, the Cities of El Segundo and Hawthorne certified the
Environmental Impact Statement/Report and adopted resolutions approving the reorganization
of Area A into the City of Hawthorne. Hawthorne has also approved all the land use
entitlements for the developments of the residential projects on Area A and the Lawndale
Annex.
(Continued on next page...)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
A. Draft Ordinance and Redevelopment Plan Amendment
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget: N/A
Amount Requested: N/A
Account Number: N/A
Project Phase: N/A
Appropriation Required: _Yes X No
James M. Hansen, 1� Zctor of Community, Economic and Development Services
REVIEWED BY: DATE: ^
L
3
ary nn, City Manager i
STAFF REPORT: August 19, 2003 Page 2
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: (cont.)
Hawthorne has prepared an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for District No. 2 to add
Area A and B into the plan area. In order forthe amendment to become effective, the Cities of
Hawthorne and El Segundo must approve the amendment. Since Area A and B of the base
are not currently within the City of Hawthorne, and only Area A will be annexed into
Hawthorne, El Segundo must give its consent to the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan.
Hawthorne is scheduled to introduce the amendments at its City Council meeting on August
25, 2003, and adopt the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan on September 8, 2003.
Should the City Council introduce the ordinance to accept the amendment to the
Redevelopment Plan, second reading of the ordinance would be scheduled for September 2,
2003.
Staff has negotiated with the City of Hawthorne to provide some protections in the proposed
Amendment to the benefit of the City of El Segundo, while at the same time continuing to
support the Councils efforts to retain the Air Force Base. The Amendment provides that the
Hawthorne Redevelopment Agency shall not receive any of the tax revenues generated from
Area B (should it be owned or operated by a private entity in the future). The Amendment also
provides that the City of El Segundo shall retain land use control over Area B, except with
respect to actions the Redevelopment Agency needs to undertake to advance the LAAFB
modernization project. Finally, the Amendment provides that the redevelopment area shall
"sunset" off of Area B, on the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) 30 years have
elapsed since Hawthorne's adoption of the Amendment, (ii) if by March 31, 2004 the
developer has not executed an owner participation agreement with the Agency and an
agreement with the federal government to construct the LAAFB project; (iii) if by December
31, 2007, construction has not commenced on the LAAFB project; or (iv) the Redevelopment
Agency no longer has a legal obligation to make payments to the developer for the LAAFB
project that require Area B to remain in the redevelopment area.
Based upon the Amendment it is possible that Area B would remain in the redevelopment area
if construction activities have commenced on Area B, but Area B is no longer slated to be used
for LAAFB purposes. However, this is only true if the developer has performed to a point
where Hawthorne has a commitment to make payments to the developer for LAAFB
improvements that require Area B to remain in the redevelopment area. The reason for
requiring Area B to remain in the redevelopment area at that point is that issuance of bonds
and /or payments by the Agency to finance the LAAFB improvements may require such. Under
current redevelopment law, given El Segundo retains land use control over the property and
the right to the taxes generated from the property, there does not appears to be any negative
impacts of leaving Area B in a redevelopment area under such circumstances.
PAPlanning & Building Safety\PROJECTS \576 - 599 \EA- 577\RDA 8 -19 -03 ais.2.DOC
08
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE TO INCLUDE
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CURRENTLY LOCATED IN
THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND COMMONLY
REFERRED TO AS AREA A AND B OF THE LOS
ANGELS AIR FORCE BASE INTO ITS REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA NO. 2
WHEREAS, that certain real property described on Exhibit A ( "Area A and B ") is
currently located within the City of El Segundo and is the location of Los Angeles Air
Force Base ( "LAAFB ") facilities; and
WHEREAS, Area B is adjacent to a portion of the LAAFB which is known as Area
A and which is proposed to be detached from the City of El Segundo and annexed to
the City of Hawthorne; and
WHEREAS, the LAAFB is home to several commands which encompass
functions related to research and development and the procurement of military space
systems; and
WHEREAS, the Air Force has received congressional authorization to relocate
the mission and support functions housed in the facilities on Area A of the LAAFB to
state -of- the -art facilities to be construction in the City of El Segundo on Area B; and
WHEREAS, the cost of construction of the new facilities on Area B is to be
funded in part from the sale of Area A to a private developer and converted to private
use;
WHEREAS, having state -of- the -art facilities serves to promote the retention of
the LAAFB; and
WHEREAS, the LAAFB generates approximately 13,000 jobs and over $8 billion
in annual contracts to area aerospace firms and is a vital part of the South Bay
economy; and
WHEREAS, the loss of the LAAFB facilities would have a significant adverse
effect on the economy of the entire South Bay area and could harm local property tax
values; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City of El Segundo to take all
reasonable steps to help preserve jobs and local businesses that are dependent on the
LAAFB; and
1 0831
WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the conversion of Area A to private residential
use, actions have been undertaken to detach Area A from the City of El Segundo and
annexed by the City of Hawthorne; and
WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the relocation of mission and support functions
from Area A to Area B within the City of El Segundo and the conversion of Area A to
private residential use within the City of Hawthorne, it has been proposed that Area A
and B be included into the existing Hawthorne Redevelopment Project No. 2 by
amendment of the Redevelopment Plan for that Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code §33213)
permits the legislative body of a community to authorize by ordinance the
redevelopment of an area within its territorial limits by another community if such area is
contiguous to such other community; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 33213, the City of El
Segundo desires to authorize the City of Hawthorne to undertake redevelopment of
Area A and B subject to the provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of El Segundo does ordain as follows:
The City Council of the City of El Segundo hereby authorizes the inclusion
of Area A and B into the Redevelopment Area of the Hawthorne
Redevelopment Project No. 2 of the Community Redevelopment Agency
of the City of the City of Hawthorne, as set forth in, and subject to the
terms and conditions set forth in the Third Amendment to the
Redevelopment Plan for the Hawthorne Redevelopment Project No. 2
attached as Exhibit B.
2. The City of El Segundo shall not be required to comply with any
requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law with respect to the
Amendment of Hawthorne Redevelopment Project No. 2 to include Area A
and B.
SECTION 2: If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court
of competent jurisdiction, the city council intends that such invalidity will not affect the
effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions
of this Ordinance are severable.
SECTION 3: The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this
Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City of El Segundo's book of original
ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting;
and, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it
to be published or posted in accordance with California law.
08-11
2
SECTION 4: This Ordinance will become effective on the thirty -first (31st) day following
its passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of 2003.
Mike Gordon, Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the
whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Ordinance
No. was duly introduced by said City Council at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of
August , 2003, and was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and
signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council
held on the _ day of , 2003, and the same was so passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
3 085
THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE
HAWTHORNE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO.2
The Redevelopment Plan for the Hawthorne Redevelopment Project No. 2
originally adopted November 26, 1984, by Ordinance No. 1330, and amended on
December 27, 1994, by Ordinance No. 1580 (First Amendment), and August 11,
1997 by Ordinance No. 1639 (Second Amendment) is hereby further amended as
follows:
1. Section 100 is hereby amended to read as follows:
This Redevelopment Plan for the City of Hawthorne
Redevelopment Project No. 2 consists of the text (Sections 100
through 1000), the Redevelopment Plan Map which consists of the
Original Project Area (Exhibit "A "), the Redevelopment Plan Map
of the Added Area which consists of the area added by this third
amendment (Exhibit "B "), the Legal Description of the Original
Project Area (Exhibit "C "), the Legal Description of the Added
Project Area (Exhibit "D ") and the Amended List of Proposed
Redevelopment Projects and Activities (Exhibit "E "). This Plan has
been prepared by the City of Hawthorne Redevelopment Agency
pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of
California, and all applicable laws and ordinances.
All references contained hereinabove shall be renumerated
appropriately as described above.
2. Add the definition of "Added Project Area" as item A of Section
200, as follows:
A. "Added Project Area" means the area to be added to the
Project Area by the Third Amendment to the
Redevelopment Plan, commonly known as Subarea A and
Subarea B as shown on the Added Area Redevelopment
Plan Map (Exhibit B) and described in the Legal Description
of the Added Area (Exhibit D).
3. Reletter items A through E of Section 200 to items B through F.
HAW_ AmdRedevPlan_v3.doc 8/13/03
03030/0028
4. Revise the definition of current Item E of Section 200 as follows:
F. "Map" means the Redevelopment Plan Maps as attached as
Exhibits A and B for the City of Hawthorne Redevelopment
Project Area No. 2.
5. Add the definition of "Original Project Area" as item G of Section
200, as follows:
G. "Original Project Area" means the portion of the Project
Area so designated on the Redevelopment Plan Map
(Exhibit A) and described in the Legal Description of the
Original Project Area (Exhibit C).
6. Revise the definition of current item I of Section 200 as follows:
K. "Project Area" means the Original Project Area and the
Added Project Area.
7. Reletter items F through K of Section 200 to items H through M.
8. Section 300 is hereby amended to read as follows:
The boundaries of the Project Area are illustrated on the Maps
contained in Exhibits A and B. The legal description of the
boundaries of the Project Area are as enumerated in Exhibits B and
C, attached hereto.
9. Paragraph 3 of Section 403 is hereby amended to read as follows:
No eminent domain proceeding to acquire property within the
Original Project Area shall be commenced after twelve (12) years
following the date of adoption of the ordinance approving and
adopting the Second Amendment to this Redevelopment Plan. No
eminent domain proceeding to acquire property within the Added
Project Area shall be commenced after twelve (12) years following
the date of adoption of the ordinance approving and adopting the
Third Amendment to this Redevelopment Plan. No eminent
domain proceeding to acquire property within Subarea B of the
Added Project Area shall be commenced unless the City Council of
the City of El Segundo has, by a vote of two- thirds of all the
HAW _AmdRedevPlan _ v3 doc 2 8/13/03
03030/0028 ;) 1
members of the City Council, ratified the resolution of necessity
adopted by the governing board of the Agency under Section
1245.220 of the California Code of Civil Procedure for such
proceeding. Such time limitations may be extended only by
amendment to this Redevelopment Plan.
10. A new fourth paragraph is hereby added to Section 403 as follows:
The Agency shall not purchase, lease, obtain option upon or
otherwise acquire real property located within Subarea B of the
Added Project Area unless the City Council of the City of El
Segundo has, by vote of a majority of its members, approved such
acquisition. Notwithstanding this paragraph, the commencement of
an eminent domain proceeding by the Agency shall be ratified by
the City Council of El Segundo as provided above.
11. Section 404 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Generally personal property shall not be acquired. However,
where necessary in the execution of the Plan, the Agency is
authorized to acquire personal property in the Project Area by any
lawful means including eminent domain, provided, however, that
no eminent domain proceeding to acquire property within Subarea
B of the Added Project Area shall be commenced unless the City
Council of the City of El Segundo has, by a vote of two- thirds of all
the members of the City Council, ratified the resolution of necessity
adopted by the governing board of the Agency under Section
1245.220 of the California Code of Civil Procedure for such
proceeding.
12. Section 430 is hereby amended to read as follows:
The Agency may, inside or outside the Project area, acquire land,
donate land, improve sites, or construct or rehabilitate structures in
order to provide housing for persons and families of low or
moderate income. The Agency may also provide subsidies to, or
for the benefit of, such persons and families or households to assist
them in obtaining housing within the City. It is contemplated that
the Agency will be able to meet and satisfy its low- and moderate -
income housing, inclusory housing, and replacement housing
obligations under the Community Redevelopment Law without
resort to Subarea B of the Added Project Area. Therefore,
1
HAW _AmdRedevPlan_v3.doc 3 8/13/03 V '
03030/0028
notwithstanding this Section 430 and Sections 431, 432 and 434, the
Agency shall not exercise any of its powers to assist, create,
develop, increase, improve, preserve, construct, rehabilitate,
relocate, replace or otherwise facilitate dwelling units affordable to
persons and families of low- and moderate- income within Subarea
B of the Added Project Area.
13. Section 501 is hereby amended to read as follows:
In addition to illustrating the location of the Project Area
boundaries, the Map also illustrates the proposed land uses and
street layout to be permitted in the Project Area. (See Exhibit A)
Except for Subarea B of the Added Project Area, the location of
such proposed land uses including proposed rights -of -way and
easements is consistent with the General Plan and zoning of the
City, and may be altered from time to time by changes to the
General Plan or zoning regulations of the City. Although Subarea
B is within the Added Project Area, it remains within the
jurisdiction and boundaries of the City of El Segundo. Therefore,
notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Sections 501 through
524, inclusive, the location of proposed land uses including
proposed rights -of -way and easements within Subarea B are and
shall be consistent with the City of El Segundo's General Plan and
Zoning Ordinance, as may be altered from time to time by changes
to the General Plan or Zoning Ordinance of the City of El Segundo.
Furthermore, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Sections
501 through 524, inclusive, neither the City nor the Agency shall
have or exercise any land use or permitting authority within
Subarea B of the Added Project Area and all land use, building, and
other permits, approvals and entitlements required for any project
within Subarea B of the Added Project Area shall be applied for to,
and considered, approved, disapproved, or conditionally
approved, and issued by the City of El Segundo. Except as
provided in the following sentences and notwithstanding anything
to the contrary in Sections 501 through 524, inclusive, the Agency
shall take no action on a project located within Subarea B of the
Project Area without the prior approval of the City Council of the
City of El Segundo by a majority vote of its members. The
foregoing limitation shall not apply to any action the Agency may
take pursuant to or in furtherance of projects or programs the
purpose of which is to assist with the relocation of the Space and
Missile Systems Center ( "SAMS ") of the Los Angeles Air Force Base
HAW_AmdRedevP1an _ v3 doc 4 8/13/03 �� Q n
03030/0028 0 7
( "LAAFB ") from Subarea A to Subarea B, including, without
limitation, the approval of an owner participation agreement and
issuance of bonds in furtherance of such purpose. However, the
Agency cannot amend the Redevelopment Plan with respect to
Subarea B, nor can the Agency take any action that allows for any
land use on Subarea B other than the LAAFB without the prior
approval of the City of El Segundo.
14. Section 513 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Except as may otherwise be provided in Section 501 with regard to
Subarea B of the Added Project Area, the number of buildings in
the Project Area shall be as permitted by the General Plan of the
City. The approximate number of dwelling units in the Original
Project Area and Subarea A of the Added Project Area shall
conform to the City of Hawthorne General Plan as it may be
amended from time to time. The approximate number of dwelling
units in Subarea B of the Added Project Area shall conform to the
City of El Segundo General Plan, which currently does not provide
for any dwelling units and is not contemplated to provide for any
dwelling units in the future, as it may be amended from time to
time.
15. The first phrase of section 602 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
The taxes levied upon taxable property within the Project Area
(excluding Subarea B of the Added Project Area and any taxes
levied upon taxable property therein) each year by or for the
benefit of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, City of
Hawthorne, any district, or other public corporation (hereinafter
sometimes called "taxing agencies ") after the effective date of the
ordinance approving this Redevelopment Project or amending this
Redevelopment Plan to add territory, as the case may be, shall be
divided as follows:
16. Paragraphs 6 and 7 of Item 3 of Section 602 is hereby amended to
read as follows:
No loan, advance or indebtedness to be repaid from such allocation
of taxes established or incurred by the Agency to finance in whole
or in part the Project shall be established or incurred after twenty
HAW_ AmdRedevPlan_v3.doc 5 8/13/03
03030/0028
(20) years following the date of adoption of the ordinance
approving and adopting this Plan for the Original Project Area, and
twenty (20) years following the date of adoption of the ordinance
approving and adopting this Third Amendment for the Added
Project Area.
As required by Ordinance No. 1580, in accordance with Health and
Safety Code Section 33333.6(c), except as provided in subdivisions
(g) or (h) of the Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6, the Agency
shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes pursuant to
Health and Safety Code Section 33670 with respect to the Original
Project Area after November 26, 2034. Pursuant to Health and
Safety Code Section 33333.2, the Agency shall not pay indebtedness
with respect to the Added Project Area or receive property taxes
pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670 with respect to
Subarea A of the Added Project Area after September 2048
(forty -five (45) years after the ordinance approving and adopting
this Third Amendment). The Agency shall not receive or be eligible
to receive any property taxes pursuant to Health and Safety Code
Section 33670 with respect to Subarea B of the Added Project Area.
17. Add a new Section 604, as follows:
D. (Sec. 604) Limitation on Receipt of Tax Increment
Notwithstanding any other provision of Article VI of this Plan,
including without limitation, section 602, no taxes shall be allocated
to the Agency from any portion of the Added Project Area which
remains within the territorial jurisdiction of the City of El Segundo.
18. Section 900 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation provisions
(which shall run in perpetuity), the provisions of this Plan shall be
effective and the provisions of other documents formulated
pursuant to this Plan may be made effective for forty (40) years
from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council with
respect to the Original Area, and thirty (30) years from the date of
adoption of this Third Amendment by the City Council with
respect to the Added Project Area, except as may otherwise be
provided herein for Subarea B of the Added Project Area.
HAW_ AmdRedevPlan_v3 doc 6 8/13/03
03030/0028
The provisions of this Plan and the power and authority of the
Agency hereunder shall be effective within Subarea B of the Added
Project Area for the lesser of either: (1) a period being thirty (30)
years from the date of adoption of the Third Amendment by the
City Council; or (2) an undetermined period commencing on the
date of adoption of the Third Amendment by the City Council and
expiring on the occurrence of any of the following:
A. By March 31, 2004, a developer selected by the Agency has
not executed an owner participation agreement with the
Agency and an agreement with the federal government
obligating the developer to undertake and complete the
relocation of the SAMS facility from Subarea A to Subarea B,
including, but not limited to, the construction of
approximately 560,000 square feet of administrative and
special use facilities on Subarea B meeting the specifications
of the Air Force ( "SAMS Subarea B Facilities ").
B. By December 31, 2007, the SAMS Project developer has not
commenced construction of the SAMS Subarea B Facilities.
C. At a time when the Agency has no further legal obligations
to make payments to the developer of the SAMS Subarea B
Facilities or provide financing for such facilities that require
Subarea B to remain in the Redevelopment Area.
19. Section 1000 is hereby amended to read as follows:
This Plan may be amended by means of the procedure established
in Sections 33450 - 33458 of the Community Redevelopment Law or
by any other procedure hereafter established by law. No
amendment of the Plan affecting Subarea B of the Added Project
Area shall be valid, binding, and effective until it has been
considered and approved, by the City Council of the City of El
Segundo, by majority vote of its members.
HAW_ AmdRedevPlan_v3.doc 7 8/13/03
03030/0028
,�9
EXHIBIT A
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP OF ORIGINAL PROJECT AREA
HAW _AmdRedevPlan_v3 doc Exhibit A 8/11/03
03030/0028 09113
A
0
A
ICL
A
A
0
A
v
Nq
4i
A
A
Z
Z
0
Z
rn
�9I
EXHIBIT B
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP OF ADDED AREA
HAW_AmdRedevPlan _ v3 doc Exhibit B 8/14/03 r
03030/0028 V
Seale. 1 3W' shnt 7 of 1 sheet
Am;en4ng B•ourTddr v of Hawthorne
Redevelopment Prof -ett No 2
Contatnlrq 30.10 Aeru
County of Lae Mgelest State at Coaforrra
300' 0' 300' 500'
GRAPHIC SCALE �-•�
1" - 300'
FREEWAY
5 18,34'12" E 000c yy i Ld
250.23' p o.e_ PROJECT 'W` '�('' W Z
J RYA U
a K 1791789.84 SITE W .:;.; 19o4n Ln
I 1 E 6449118.06
LA C I ENEGA r AVIATION BOULEVARD
BOULEVARD {z"
N 81'23'56" E
348.02' WCNITY MAP
,6-98',34'09t NOT TO SCALE
R= 140.00' '
L= 245.85
s
(Rod)mss.
OOS
5 89'45'00" E-- 92 s tea,
477.18'
S 0'05'53" W I ` o
50.00'
ISIS
AVENUE
o y
r
APAI ' 41;45�ODi — 9Q1 i
0 03 0
m 4
y�j a Y
Z a
S
r
A m
7
i
N 1792165.87 }
E 6446845.56 :A11'IAT I ON - BOULEVARD
N 11'21'00" E 421.61' N 0'13'08" E 1186.48' J
SPACE TECHNOLOGY AVIATION BOULEVARD
W li TERRITORY ANNEXATION
I—
of Bk 4215 pg 316, Deeds 8/4150 8/20/61
DATE: 04/15/03 REVISED ON:
Annexation Arco JOB No: 1REA020100 Task 116
0
s
096
Scale: 1" - 300' Sheet 1 of 1 She-at Amen -ding Boundary of Howthorne
Redevelopment Project too 2 Addtiona.l
Contobift 61,0'1 Acres
/T1 County of Los Angeles. State of Corcfornio
300' 0' 300` 600'
o�
�
:S I;
1 I o GRAPHIC SCALE
ITE' ' W 0 _ L2 1" =Sao' II
V) p I I
N
o EL L10
Z Nr EGUNDO .J L9 L11 C-4
I;
L4 L8 0
a' BLVD :�. :...... t. L5 L� o l , 17
s jj .............. L6 I
am I... L . . ....... f ��
1fIC�N.ITY MAP I .�. �'.'.'. .'.'.'..'.'.'...'.'.'.'.',' N' 17J ss:
E - 64467.36:52•
NOT TO SCALE ........... ..................... ,!
LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEADING
L1200B.61'
C1
N00'00'53 "E
L2
338.'18'
S89'59'07 "E
L3
182.00'
SOO.00'53 "w
L4
2$9.64'
S89'59'07 ':E
L5
6 7.9 S1
S00'00'53W
L6
458.82'
589'58'15 "E
- - -L'7
—` 38: -T9"
-- NWT0B'45'
L8
73.81'
S89'58'1 5"E
L8
38.39'
N67'20'1 5 "E
L10
101.20;
N89 59'22 ^'E
99.45' 589'54'
153.27' S89'54'
8.99' N48'02'i
457.16' 589'54'
10100' N00'05'
50.66' S89'54'
18.69' 565'05'
31..66' 1781fl'
158.17' 566'02'
122.97' 589'54'
1203' N89'54'
�. ........... .'.•...'..'.'.'.'.'.•.'....ca.' '^'�. C'
.'.'.'.'.•. .'.'.'.'. .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. ... .'.'.'.'. .'.'. .'.�
.. . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . ... . . . .
CO ip
7.'.I'(U.'.'.'.'.'. .'.'...'.'.'.'.•.•. .'.'.'.'.'.'.'. .'.'. .'.'.'.'. Cr
I ...• .................4-' I zl �.
. . . . r-'
. . . . . ::: -::: ^' 1 -- as �-
I. I
' b' .............'..'....'. .........'.•. ..''..'.'...''...'..'.'...''..'
-Q > . ' ' '' '� APN .4i3B7901...... 00
. ........ . I ............... . ..... p .O
. CY) 0
• • o IN m
o .... . ....... .......... :... . ...... .... ..... ................ M--I
J N
,
00 z
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . .d. n k<
........................................... .... ..............................� z I
:.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' .'..'...'.'.'.'..'.'...'.'.'.'. al. Q
. I I a ---�
I>
............... ..................... Q
i I
I ' ' PCB .. ..............................� I. ;�,
N 1.7921'68.43 .................... .
I' E .64453�9.�5• .. APN.'4138= QQ2 =R0.4 ' �` . 1. Lo
�• — — — — — .ice, L1p _� �
�.. L35 . ..... L27, �
�C 4 L32 L33i 30 L2 � L N °
U _j o
DATE: 05/06/03 REVISED ON:
JOB No: 1 KEA020100 Task 116 °
Annexotion Areo a
CURVE TABLE
CURVELENGTHI
RAOtUS
DELTA
C1
39. -24'
25.00'
89.55'38"
C2
18.10'
2834.93'
00'21'57"
PS o M aAS
J J I aar�o
rrurMpreta�
pma3�Sm pigl4s,4t)
EXHIBIT C
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ORIGINAL PROJECT AREA
HAW_ AmdRedevPlan_v3.doc Exhibit C 8/14/03
03030/0028
096
LEGAL DrSU'l i'TI ON OF F..T)L•VEL0NF,LKT }'R0JT:CT AREA NO. 2
All those portions of tie City of Hawthorne, County of Los
Angeles, State of California within the following described
boundaries:
SUB AREA "A"
Beginning at the southwesterly corner of the northwesterly one
quarter of Section, 20, Township 3 South, Range'•14 West, San
Bernardino Base and Meridian, said southwesterly corner also being
the point of intersection of the centerlines of Aviation
Boulevard, 80 feet Wide, and Compton Boulevard, 80 feet wide;
thence northerly along said centerline of Aviation Boulevard to
• the southwesterly corner of section 17 of said township; thence
continuing northerly along said centerline to the northerly line
of .the south 50 feet of said last mentioned Section; thlence
easterly along said last mentioned line to the southeast corner of
Lot 121, of Tract No. 20263 as per map recorded in Book No. 550,
pages 1 through 4, of records in the Office of the County Recorder
of said County; thence northerly along the easterly line of said
lot to the southerly corner of Lot 122 of said Tract; thence
northeasterly in a direct line to the southwest corner of Lot 127
of said Tract; thence easterly in a direct line to the southwest
corner of Lot 134 of said Tract; thence northerly following the
easterly right of way line of Glasgow Place as shown on said map
to the southwest corner of Lot 175 of said tract; thence
continuing northerly in a direct line to the northwest corner of
Lot 7 of Tract No. 20033 as per map recorded in book 544 page 1 of
said records; thence contnuing northerly along said easterly
right of way line to the southerly corner of Lot 31 of Tract No.
16663 as per map recorded in Book 511, pages 15 through 19 of said
records. thence continuing westerly, easterly and westerly along
said right of way line of Glasgow Place and the contiguous
property lines of Lots 31 thru 35 of said last mentioned tract to
the southwest corner of said Lot 35; thence northwesterly along
the 'southwesterly line of said lot to the northwest corner of said
Lot; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said
Lot to the 'northeast corner of Lot 34 of said Tract; thence
northwesterly along the mutual boundaries of the City of E1
Segundo and the City of Hawthorne as they existed on August 1,
1984 to the northerly right -of -way line of the San Diego Freeway;
thence continuing southwesterly, northwesterly and northerly along
the various courses of said mutual boundary line and northerly
right -of -way line of said freeway, to the boundary line of the
County of Los Angeles as it existed on said date, said boundary
line being parallel to and distant 30 feet southerly from the
centerline of E1 Segundo -Boulevard, 100 feet wide; thence
easterly, southerly, southeasterly, southwesterly and southerly
along the various courses of said boundary Sine to the northerly
line of Lot 23 Tract No. 2542 as per map recorded in Book No. 26,
page 73, of said records; thence Easterly along the northerly
line of said lot to a point on said northerly line distant 80 foot
westerly, from the northeast corner of said Lot 23; thence
-pa ge 1 -.
southerly parallel to and distant 80 feet westerly of the easterly
line of said Lot 23 to the northerly line of Lot 20 of said Tract;
thence easterly in a direct line to the northwest corner of Lot 2
of said tract; thence northerly in a direct line to-the northwest
corner of Lot 41 of said tract; thence easterly in a direct line
to the northwest corner of Lot 42 of said tract; thence northerly
in a direct line to a point on the southerly line of Lot 86 of
said- tract, said point lying distant easterly 80 feet from the
southwest corner of said Lot 86; thence easterly along the
southerly line of said Lot 86 to a point distant 40 feet westerly
from the southeast corner of said Lot 86; thence northerly
parallel to and distant 40 feet westerly of the easterly 'line of
said .Lot 86 of said tract to a point on the northerly line of said
Lot 86; thence easterly along the northerly line of said lot to a
point lying distant westerly 25 feet from the northeast corner'of
said Lot 86; thence northerly parallel to and distant westerly 25
feet from the easterly line of Lot 119 of said tract to a point on
the northerly line of said Lot 119; thence westerly along said
northerly line to a point lying distant easterly 90 feet from the
northwest corner of said lot 119; thence northerly in a direct
line to a point lying on the northerly line of Lot 155 of said
tract, said point lying westerly 24 feet from the northeast corner
of said lot, said point also lying on southerly right of way line
of 139th Street (formerly Buckeye Avenue), 40 feet wide; thence
easterly along the southerly right of way line of 139th Street and
the easterly prolongation thereof, to its intersection with the
centerline of Inglewood Avenue, 80 feet wide; thence northerly
along said centerline of Inglewood Avenue to its intersection
with the easterly prolongation of the northerly right of way line
of 137th Street (formerly Nazelton Avenue), 50 feet wide, thence
westerly along said easterly prolongation and northerly right of
way line to the southwest corner of Lot 12 of Block 12 of Tract
No. 6490 as per map recorded in Map Book 70, pages 72 and 73 of
said records; thence northerly in a direct line to the southwest
corner of Lot 12, Block 6 of said tract; thence westerly along
the northerly right of way line of 135th Street (formerly
Connecticut Avenue), 50 feet wide; to the southwest corner of Lot
18 of said block 6; thence northerly in a direct line to the
northwest corner of Lot 6 of said block 6;, thence easterly along
the southerly right of way line of 134th Place (formerly Gaines
Avenue), 50 feet wide to the northeast corner of Lot 7 of said
block 6; thence northeasterly along a direct line between the
northeast corner of said Lot 7 of said block 6 and the northwest
corner of Lot 204 of Ingledale Acres as per map recorded in Map
Book 20, pages 182 and 183 of said records, to its-intersection
with. said centerline of Inglewood Avenue; thence northerly along
said last mentioned centerline to its intersection with the
easterly prolongation of the northerly right of way line of 131st
Street, 50 feet wide; thence westerly along said-last mentioned
easterly prolongation and right of way line to the southwest
corner of Lot 12, Block 9 of Tract No. 5755 as per map recorded in
Book 63, pages 10 and 11 of said records; thence northerly in a
direct line to the southwest corner of lot 9 of said block 9; .
thence westerly along the southerly line of lot 6 of said block 9
—page 2—
a distance of 40 feet; thence northerly parallel to and distant
40 feet westerly from the easterly line of said lot 6 to the
northerly line of said lot 6; thence easterly in a direct line to
the northeast corner of said lot 6; thence northerly to the
southwest corner of Lot 17 of Block 3 of-said Tract; thence
easterly along the southerly line of said lot 17 and the easterly
prolongation thereof to said centerline of Inglewood Avenue;
thence northerly along said centerline to its intersection with
the easterly prolongation of the northerly right of way line of E1
Segundo Boulevard -(formerly Ballona Avenue), 100 feet wide;
thence westerly along said northerly prolongation of El Segundo
Boulevard to the southerly prolongation of the westerly right of
way line of said Inglewood Avenue; thence northerly along said
last mentioned southerly prolongation and westerly right of way
line of said Inglewood Avenue and its northerly prolongation to a
point 25 feet southerly of the centerline of West Broadway
(formerly Broadway) 50 feet wide as shown on map of Town of
Hawthorne recorded in book 15 pages 110 and 111 of said records;
thence easterly in a direct line to the northwest corner of Lot 20
of Block Z of said Town of Hawthorne; thence easterly along the
southerly right of way line of Broadway to a point on said last
mentioned right of way line distant westerly 164 feet from the
easterly line of said Lot 20; thence southerly parallel to and
distant 164 feet westerly of the easterly line of said Lot 20, to
the northerly line of Lot 19 of said block and tract; thence
easterly along the northerly line of said Lot 19 to a point
distant 116 feet westerly from the northeast corner of said lot;.
thence '-southerly parallel to and distant 116 feet westerly from
the easterly line of said Lot 19 to a point 60 feet northerly from
the southerly line of said Lot 19; thence easterly parallel to
and distant 60 feet northerly from the southerly 'line of said lot
19 to the easterly line of said Lot 19; thence northerly along th
easterly line of sad lot 19 to the northeast corner of said Lot 19
of said block and tract; thence easterly along the northerly line
of Lot 2 of 'said block and tract to the westerly right of way line
Of Eucalyptus Avenue (formerly Redondo Avenue), 50 feet wide;
thence. southerly along said westerly right of way line to the
southerly line -of Lot 3 of said block and tract; thence westerly
a distance of 150 feet along the southerly line of said Lot 3;
thence southerly parallel to and distant 150 feet westerly of the
westerly right of way-line of Eucalyptus Avenue to the southerly
line of Lot '4 of said block and tract; thence westerly in a
direct line to the southwest• corner of said Lot 4; thence
southerly in a direct line to the southwest corner of Lot 9 of
said block and tract; thence easterly in a direct line to the
northeast corner of Lot 2 of Tract No. 7252 as per map recorded in
Book 80, Page 76, of said records; thence continuing
northeasterly in a direct line to the northwest corner of Lot 5 of
Tract No. 7706 as per map recorded in Book 98, Page 11, of said
records; thence easterly to the northeast corner of lot 4 of said
tract; • thence northerly along the northerly prolongation of•the
easterly line of said lot 4 a distance of 15 feet; thence
easterly parallel to and distant northerly 130 feet from the
northerly right of way line of E1 Segundo Blvd. 100 feet wide a
-page 3-
i
distance of 50 feet; thence southerly in a direct line to I
northwest corner of Lot 3 of said Tract 7706; thence continu:
easterly in a direct line to the northeast corner of Lot 1 of si
tract; thence continuing southeasterly in a'diredt line to t
northwest corner of Lot 6 of Tract No. 5482 as per map recorded
Book 100,: Page 96 of said records; thence continuing easterly
a direct line to the northeast corner of Lot 1 of said tract
thence northerly along the westerly right of way line of Grevill
Avenue (formerly Sausal Avenue) 50 feet wide to its intersects
with the northerly' right ofl way line of West Broadway, 50 fe
wide; thence easterly in a direct line to the southeast corner
Lot 4, Tract No. 2006 as per map recorded in Book 21, Page 105
thence northerly in a direct line to the northeast corner of sa
Lot 4; thence continuing northerly along the prolongation of t
easterly line of said lot' 4 a distance of 52.5 feet; then
westerly parallel to and distant 52.5 feet northerly from t
northerly line of said Tract No. 2006 to a point distant easter
185.02 feet from the easterly right of way line of Grevill
Avenue; thence northerly parallel to and distant 185.02 fe
easterly from said easterly right of way line of Grevillea to t
southerly line-of Lot 30, Block R,-Town of Hawthorne Tract, as p
map recorded in Book 15, Pages 110 and 111 of said records
thence westerly along said southerly line of said Lot 30 to
point distant easterly 150 feet from said easterly right of w.
line of Grevillea Avenue; thence northerly parallel to a
distant easterly 150 feet from said easterly right of way line
Grevillea Avenue to the southerly line of Lo't 31 of said block a
tract; thence westerly along said southerly lot line to a poi,
distant easterly 130 feet from said easterly right of way line
Grevillea Avenue; thence northerly parallel to and distal
easterly 130 feet from said easterly right of way line to t)
southerly line of lot 32 of said block and tract; thence easter:
along said southerly lot line to a point distant easterly 160.(
feet from said easterly right of way line of Grevillea Avenue
thence northerly parallel to distant easterly 160.06 feet from t)
easterly right of way line of Grevillea Avenue-to a point on t)
southerly line of Lot 33 of said block and tract; thence easter:
to a point on said southerly lot line distant easterly 185.04 fe(
from the easterly right of way line of Grevillea Avenue; then(
northerly parallel to and distant easterly 185.04 feet from sa:
easterly right of way line of Grevillea Avenue, a distance of 52.
feet; thence westerly parallel to and distant northerly 52.5 fee
from the southerly line of Lot 33 of said block and tract to
point distant easterly 115 feet from said easterly right of wE
line of Grevillea Avenue; thence northerly parallel to ar
distant easterly 115 feet from said easterly right of way line c
Grevillea Avenue to the southerly line of Lot 34 of said block ar
tract; thence easterly along said southerly line to a poir
distant easterly 176.08 feet from the easterly right of way lir
of Grevillea Avenue; thence northerly parallel to and distar
easterly 176.06 feet from said- easterly right of way line c
Grevillea Avenue to a point on the southerly line of Lot 35 c
said block and tract; thence westerly along said southerly lc
line to a point distant easterly 160.09 feet from said easterl
• -page 4 .4 0',-'
Revised Scpt. 25,1984
right of way line of Grevillea Avenue; thence northerly parallel
to and distant 160.09 feet easterly from said easterly right of
way line to the southerly line of Lot 37 of said block and tract;
thence easterly along said southerly lot line'to a point distant
easterly 200.11 feet from said easterly right of way line of
Grevillea Avenue; thence northerly parallel to and distant 200.11
feet 'easterly of said easterly right of way line of Grevillea
Avenue to the norpherly right of way line of 120th Street
(formerly Raymond Avenue), 80 feet wide; thence , easterly along
said northerly right of way line to the southeast corner of Lot
No. 1'.of Tract No. 9498 as per map recorded in Book 128, Pages 10
and 11, of said records; thence northerly in a direct line to the
northeast corner of Lot 30, Block S, of said Town of Hawthorne
Tract; thence westerly along the northerly line of said lot and
prolongation thereof to said westerly right of way line of
Grevillea Avenue, 50 feet wide; thence northerly along said
westerly right of way line to the southerly right of way line of
118th Street (formerly Wallace Street), 60 feet wide; thence
westerly along said southerly right of way line to the westerly
right of way line of Ramona Avenue, 60 feet wide; thence
northerly along said last mentioned westerly right of way line to
a point distant 40 feet northerly of the centerline of 116th,
Street (formerly Miramar Street) 60 feet wide as shown on Tract
No. 7963 recorded in Book 85 pages 75 and 76 of said records;
thence easterly in a direct line to the southeast corner of Lot
135 of Belleview Tract as recorded in Book 9 page 77 of said
records; thence easterly along the northerly right of way line of
116th. Street 80 feet wide to the westerly right of way line of
Grevillea Avenue, 60 feet wide; thence northerly along said
westerly right of way line to the southeast corner of Lot 47 of
said Belleview Tract; thence westerly in a direct line to the
southwest corner of Lot 66 of said tract; thence southerly along
the wester Ty line of Lot 67 of said Belleview Tract a distance of
20 feet; thence westerly .in a direct line to the northeast
corner of Lot 13 of said Tract No. 7963; thence westerly along
the southerly right of way line of the alley as Chown on said map
of Tract No. 7963 and, its westerly prolongation to its
intersection with the westerly right of way line of Eucalyptus
Avenue 50 feet wide; thence northerly along said last mentioned
westerly right of way line to a point distant northerly 125 feet
from the southeast porner of Lot 21 of Tract 1543 as per map
recorded in Book 18, Page 198, of said records; thence westerly
In a direct line to the southwest corner of Lot 22 of said tract
1543; thence southwesterly in a direct line to the southeast
corner of Lot 20 of said tract 1543, said point lying on the
westerly right of way lisle of Gale Avenue 50 feet wide; thence
westerly in a direct line to the southwest corner of said Lot 20;
thence northerly in a direct line to the northwest corner of said
lot 20; thence westerly parallel to and distant southerly 30 feet
from the centerline of Imperial Highway (formerly Belleview
Avenue), 100 feet wide, said line being the boundary line between
the Cities of Dawthorne and Los Angeles, to the southerly
prolongation of the westerly line of Lot 368, Tract No. 324 as per
map recorded in Book 14, Page 64 -of of said records; thence
—page 5— 163
xevisen bcpt. Z_,),1y54
northerly in a direct line to the northwest corner of said Lot
368; thence easterly along the northerly line of said lot and the
easterly prolongation thereof, to the centerline of said Inglewood
Avenue, variable 66 to 80 feet wide; thence northerly along said
last mentioned centerline to its intersection with the westerly
prolongation of the northerly line of Lot No. 106,.-Tract No. 957
as per map recorded in Book 16, Pages 198 and 199, of said
records; thence easterly along said last mentioned northerly
line and its easterly prolongation to the centerline of Dalerose
Avenue, 50 feet wide, said last mentioned centerline also being
the easterly line of said Lot 106 and lots 107, 108, and 109 of
said Tract 957; thence southerly along said centerline to its
intersection with the westerly prolongation of the northerly line
of Lot 91 of said tract 957; thence easterly along said northerly
lot line to a point on the northerly line of Lot 90 of said tract
957, said point lying distant easterly 139 feet from the northwest
corner of said lot 90; thence northerly in a direct line to a
point on the southerly line of Lot 87 of said tract 957, said last
mentioned point being distant 139.24 feet from the southwest
corner of said Lot 87; thence easterly along said last mentioned
southerly lot line and prolongation thereof to the centerline of
Truro Avene, 50 feet wide said centerline also being the easterly
line of Lot 88 of said Tract 957; thence southerly along said
centerline to its intersection with the westerly prolongation of
the northerly line of Parcel B of Parcel Map No. 3349 as per map
recorded in Parcel Map Book 42, Page 30 of said records; thence
easterly along said northerly parcel line to the centerline of
Firmona Avenue ( formerly Fir Avenue), 50 feet wide; thence
southerly along said last mentioned centerline to a point distant
30 feet southerly from the centerline of said Imperial Highway 100
feet wide; thence easterly parallel to and distant 30 feet
southerly from said last mentioned centerline to its intersection
with the southerly prolongation of the easterly right of way line
of Burin Avenue (formerly Mansfield Place), 40 feet wide as shown
on Tract No. 1698 recorded in Book 24 page 46 of said records;
thence northerly along said easterly right of way line to the
northwest corner of Lot 101 of said tract 1698; thence easterly
along the northerly line of said Lot 101.a distance of 5 feet;
thence northerly along the easterly line of the westerly 25 feet
of Lots 11 and 12 of said Tract 957 a distance of 83 feet; thence
westerly in a direct line to the southeast corner of Lot 17 of
Tract No. 6553 as recorded in Book 71 page 78 of said records;
thence westerly along the southerly lines of Lots 17 and 22 of
said Tract No. 6553, to the centerline'of Grevillea Avenue, 50
feet wide; thence northerly along said last mentioned centerline
to the easterly prolongation of the southerly line of Lot 53 of
said Tract No. 957; thence westerly along said southerly line to
the easterly right of way line of Mansel Avenue, 40 feet wide,
said easterly right of way line also being distant .40 feet
easterly and parallel to the westerly lines of said Lots 53 and 54
of said Tract 957; thence northerly along said easterly right of
way line to the southerly line of Lot 55 of said tract; thence
westerly along said southerly line to the southwest corner of
said Lot 55; thence northerly in a direct line to the northwest
—page 6— 104
Revised Sept. 25,1964
corner of Lot 60 of said tract; thence easterly along the
northerly line of said lot to the centerline of said Grevillea
Avenue, 50 feet wide; thence southerly along said centerline to
its intersecton with the westerly prolongation of the southerly
line of Lot 1 of said Tract No. 6553; thence easterly along the
southerly line of Lots 1 through 6 inclusive of said-tract and the
easterly prolongation thereof to the easterly right of way line of
said Burin Avenue, 50 feet -wide; . thence northerly along said
easterly right of 'way line to the southerly right of way line of
111th Street (formerly Center Avenue), 50 feet wide; thence
easterly along said southerly right of way line to the westerly
right of way line of Hawthorne Boulevard (formerly Hawthorne
Avenue), 135 feet wide said westerly right of way line being
distant 65 feet westerly and parallel to the centerline of said
Hawthorne Boulevard; thence southerly along said last mentioned
westerly right of way line to its intersection with the westerly
prolongation of the southerly line of Lot 31 of Hawthorne Acres
Tract as per asap recorded in Book 9, Page 128, of said records;
thence easterly along said westerly prolongation and southerly
line of said lot 31 to the westerly right of way line of,Acacia
Avenue, 50 feet wide, said westerly right of way line also being
the westerly line of the easterly 25 feet of Lots 32,33,34, and 35
of said Hawthorne Acres; thence southerly along said westerly
right of way line to the westerly prolongation of the northerly
line of Lot 37 of said tract; thence easterly along said last
mentioned westerly prolongation and northerly line of Lot 37 and
its easterly prolongation to the centerline of Larch Avenue
(formerly Birch Avenue), 40 feet wide; thence northerly along
said centerline to its intersection with the westerly prolongation
of the northerly line of Lot 106 of said tract; thence easterly
in a direct line to a point on the northerly line of Lot 110 of
said tract, said point lying distant 147.7 feet westerly from the
westerly right of way line of Freeman Avenue, 55 feet wide;
thence northerly parallel to and distant westerly 147.7 feet from
said westerly right of way line of Freeman Avenue, a distance of
100 feet; thence easterly to said westerly right of way line of
Freeman Avenue; thence northerly to the northeast corner of Lot
111 of said tract; thence westerly along said northerly line, a
distance of 147.7 feet; thence northerly parallel to and distant
147.7 feet westerly of said westerly right of way line of Freeman
Avenue to the southerly line of Lot 114 of said tract; thence
easterly along said southerly -lot line to a point on said lot
line, distant westerly 136 feet from said westerly right of way
line -of Freeman Avenue; thence northerly parallel to and distant
136 feet westerly from said westerly right of way line of Freeman
Avenue a distance of 140 f.eet; thence easterly parallel to and
distant 8 feet northerly from the southerly line of Lot 115 of
said tract, to said westerly right of way line of Freeman Avenue;
thence northerly along said westerly right of way line to its
intersection with the- northerly 'line of the southerly 12 feet of
lot 116 of said Hawthorne Acres Tract and its easterly
prolongation; thence easterly along said last mentioned'
prolongation to its intersection with the centerline of said
Freeman Avenue; thence northerly along said last mentioned
-page 7-
Revised Sept. 25,14
centerline to the westerly prolongation of a line lying paral:
to and distant 66 feet northerly from the southerly line of 1
140 of said tract; thence easterly along said last mentior
prolongation and parallel line and its easterly prolongation
the centerline of Eastwood Avenue, 50 feet wide said centerli
also -being the westerly line of Lots 149 thru' 158 of sa
Hawthorne Acres Tract; thence southerly along said last mentior
centerline to the northwest corner of Lot 153 of said tract
thence easterly along the northerly line of said lot 153 to t
centerline of Osage Avenue (formerly Oxford Avenue), 40 feet wid
thence southerly along said last mentioned centerline to t
westerly prolongation of a line parallel to and distant 47 fe
northerly of the southerly line of Lot 185 of said'tract; then
easterly along said last mentioned parallel line, a distance
172 :85 feet; thence southerly parallel to and distant 152.85 `fe
easterly from the westerly line of said lot 165 to the souther
line of said Lot 185; thence easterly along said last mention
southerly line to the centerline of York Avenue, 50 feet wid
said last mentioned centerline also being the easterly lines
lots 184 thru 188 of said Hawthorne Acres Tract; thence souther
along said last mentioned centerline to the southerly right of w
line of said Imperial Highway, 100 feet wide; thence - easterly
along said southerly right of way line to the easterly right
way line of Prairie Avenue (formerly Centennalia Aveue), 100 fe
wide; thence northerly along said easterly right of way line
the northerly line of Lot 1 of Tract No. 1615 as per map record,
in Book 20, Page 104, of said records; thence easterly along sa:
northerly lot line to the northeast corner of Lot 2 of said tract
thence southerly along the easterly lot line of said Lot 2 to ti
southerly right of way line of said Imperial Highway, 100 fef
wide; thence easterly along said southerly right of way line to
point lying .330 feet easterly of the northeast corner of Lot 1.
Tract No. 12030, as per map recorded in Book 227, Pages 25 the
27, inclusive of said records; thence southerly parallel to ai
distant- 330 feet easterly from the easterly line of said trac
12030 to the easterly prolongation of the southerly line of Lol
23 through 32 inclusive of said tract 12030; thence wester:
along said last mentioned prolongation to the centerline 1
Kornblum Avenue, 50 feet wide; thence northerly along t
easterly line of said tract to the southerly line of the 20 fo(
alley as shown on said tract 12030; thence westerly along sa:
southerly right of way line and'the westerly prolongation therei
to the westerly right of way line of Doty Avenue, 55 wide; then(
northerly along said last mentioned right of way line to tl
southeast corner of Lot 671 of Tract No. 2643 as per map records
in Book 26, Page 64, records of Los Angeles County; then(
westerly to the northeast corner of Lot 682 of said tract, se:
point being distant 150 feet easterly of the centerine of se-
Prairie *Avenue, 100 feet wide; thence southerly parallel to ai
distant 150 feet easterly from said centerline of Prairie Aveni
to the centerline of 120th Street, variable 65 to 70 feet wid,
said centerline also being the the northerly line of the sou*
-page 8-
-
o'ne half of Section 10 of said Township; thence easterly along
said last mentioned centerline to the centerline of Crenshaw
Boulevard, 100 feet wide said last mentioned centerline also being
the easterly line of said Section 10; thence continuing easterly
along said centerline of 120th. Street a distance bf 50 feet;
thence southerly' a distance of 705 feet along a line parallel to
and distant 50 feet easterly from said last mentioned centerline;
thence westerly parallel to and distant 705 feet southerly from
said centerline of• 120th Street to a point distant easterly 50
feet from said centerline of Prairie Avenue, 100 feet wide;
thence southerly along a line parallel• to and distant 50 feet
easterly from said last mentioned centerline to the northerly
right of way line of E1 Segundo• Boulevard, 100 feet wide; thence
easterly along said last mentioned northerly right of way line to
the northerly prolongation of the westerly right of way line of
Cordary Avenue, 50 feet wide; thence southerly along said
westerly right of way line to a point 319.18 feet southerly of'the
southerly right of way 'line of E1 Segundo Boulevard, 100 feet
wide; thence westerly parallel to and distant 319.18 feet from
the southerly right of way line of E1 Segundo Boulevard to the
westerly line of Lot 13, Tract Vo. 874, Division A, as per map
recorded in Book 17, rages 110 and 111; thence northerly along
said, westerly lot line, a distance of 10 feet; thence westerly
parallel to and distant 309.18 feet southerly from said southerly
right of way line of E1 Segundo Boulevard to the easterly right of
way line of Roselle Avenue 50 feet wide, said right of way line
being the easterly* line of the west 25 feet of Lot 114 of said
Tract 874 Division A; thence northerly along said easterly right
of way line to a point distant 173.51 feet southerly, from said
southerly right of way line of El Segundo Boulevard; thence
.�esterly parallel to and distant 173.51 feet southerly from said
southerly right of way line of E1 Segundo Boulevard, a distance of
187.5 feet; thence southerly parallel to and distant westerly
162.5 feet from the centerline of said Roselle Avenue to the
northerly line of Lot 36 of Tract No. 5545 as per map recorded in
Book 87, Pages 38 and 39; thence westerly along said northerly
line tp the northwest corner of said lot 36; thence southerly in
a direct line to the southwest corner of Lot 23 of said tract
5545; thence westerly along the southerly line of Lot 22 of said
tract, a distance of 15 feet; thence southerly parallel to and
distant 150 feet easterly from said centerline of Prairie Avenue
to the northerly line of Lot 64 of said Tract No. 874, Division A;
thence easterly along the northerly line of said lot 64, a
distance of 20 feet; thence southerly parallel to and distant 170
feet easterly from said centerline of Prairie Avenue to the
northerly line of Lot 72 of said last mentioned division and
tract;' thence easterly along said northerly line a distance of 40
feet; thence southerly parallel to and distant 210 feet easterly
from said centerline of Prairie Avenue to the northerly line of
Lot 80 of said last mentioned division and tract; thence
westerly' along said northerly line, a distance of 30 feet; thence
southerly parallel to and distant 160 feet easterly from said
centerline of Prairie Avenue, a distance of 88 feet; thence
Westerly parallel to and distant 40 feet northerly of the
-page 9-
nor the rl }, line of Lot 88 of said last mentioned division and
tract, a distance of 12.5 feet; thence southerly parallel to and
distant 167.5 feet easterly from said centerline of Prairie Avenue
to the northerly line of Lot 96 of said last mentioned division
and tract; thence easterly along said northerly lot line, a
distance of 12.5 feet; thence southerly parallel to'and distant
180 feet easterly of said centerline of Prairie Avenue to the
northerly line of Lot 112 of said division A of tract 874; thence
easterly along said northerly line, a distance of 10 feet; thence
southerly parallel to and distant 190 feet easterly from said
centerline of Prairie Avenue to the northerly line of Lot 128 of
said last mentioned division and tract; thence easterly along
said northerly lot line and the easterly prolongation thereof to
the centerline *of Roselle Avenue, 50 feet wide, said centerline
also being the easterly line of said Lot 128; thence southerly
along said last mentioned centerline and the prolongation thereof
to the northwest corner of Lot 14, Tract No. 874, Division B, as
per' map recorded in Book 17, Pages 110 and 111 of said records;
thence easterly in a direct line to the northeast corner of said
lot 14; thence southerly in a direct line to the southeast corner
of said lot; , thence westerly in•a direct line to.the southwest
corner of said lot 14; thence southerly in a direct line to the
southwest corner of Lot 11, of said last mentioned division and
tract; thence easterly in a direct line to the southeast corner
of said Lot 11; thence southerly in a direct line to the
southeast corner of Lot 301 of said division and tract; thence
westerly in a direct line to the southwest corner of said lot and
tract; '-thence northerly in a direct line to the northwest corner
of said lot 301; thence westerly along the northerly line of Lot
320 of said division and tract to a point 50 feet easterly of said
- enterline of Prairie Avenue, 100 feet wide; thence southerly
larallel to and distant 50 feet easterly from said last mentioned
centerline to the southerly line of Lot 316 of said division and
tract; thence easterly along the southerly line of said lot 326,
a distance of 255 feet; thence southerly parallel to and distant
305 feet easterly from said centerline of Prairie Avenue, a
distance of 60 feet; thence easterly parallel to and distant 68
feet northerly from the southerly line of Lot 315 of said division
and tract a distance of 25 feet; thence southerly parallel to and
distant 330 feet easterly from said centerline of Prairie Avenue
to the northeast corner of Lot 311 of said division and tract;
thence easterly along the northerly lines of Lots 310, and 291 and
their easterly prolongation and the northerly line of lot'290 of
said division and tract to the westerly right of way line of Doty
Avenue, 55 feet wide; thence northerly along said westerly right
of way line to the southerly line of Lot 287 of said division and
tract; thence easterly to the southeast corner of Lot 274 of said
division and tract; thence'continuing easterly to the northwest
corner of Lot 7 of Tract No. 13911 as per map recorded in Book
292, Page 26, of said records; thence southerly to the southwest
corner o'f Lot 8 of said tract; thence easterly to the southeast
corner of Lot 19 of said tract; thence continuing northeasterly
in a direct line to a point on the easterly right of way line of
Kornblum Avenue, 50 feet wide, said point lying distant 42 feet,
—page 10—
I 0S
Revised Scpt. 25,1984
northerly of the northerly line of Lot 252, of said Division 13,
Tract 874; thence easterly parallel to and distant northerly 42
feet from said lot line to the westerly line of Lot 248 of said
division and tract; thence southerly along said westerly lot line
to the southwest corner of Lot 249 of said Diviion and Tract;
thence easterly along the southerly line of said Lot 249, a
distance of 101.10 feet; thence southerly parallel to and distant
101.10 feet easterly of westerly line of Lot 250 of said division
and tract to the northerly right of way line of Rosecrans Avenue,
100 feet wide; thence easterly along said northerly right of way
line to the westerly right of way line of Yukon Avenue, 50 feet
wide; ' thence northerly along paid westerly right of way line to
the northerly line of said Lot 249 of said division and tract;
thence easterly in- a direct line to the northeast corner of Lot
59, Division C of Tract No. 874 as per map recorded in Boo} 18,
Page 136 of said records; thence southerly to th,e northeast
corner of Lot 60 of said division and tract; thence easterly
along the northerly line of Lot 61 of said division and tract to
the westerly right of way line of Lemoli Avenue, 45 feet wide;
thence northerly along said westerly right of way line to the
southeast corner of Lot 63 of said division and tract; thence
easterly in a direct line to the southeast corner of-Lot 98 of
said division and tract; thence northerly'to the northeast corner
of said lot 98; thence easterly in a direct line to the northwest
corker of Lot 138 of said division and tract; thence southerly
along the easterly right of way line of Chadron Avenue, variable
wide 40 to 45 feet to the northerly line of Rosecrans Avenue,
variable 99.5 to 100 feet wide; thence easterly along said last
mentioned northerly right of way line to a point distant 210 feet
westerly from the easterly line of Lot 140 of said division and
tract; thence northerly parallel to and distant 210 feet westerly
from said easterly line of said Lot 140 to the northerly line of
Lot 139 of said division and tract; thence easterly in a direct
line- to the northeast corner of said Lot 139; thence northerly in
a direct line to the northwest corner of Lot 159 of said division
and tract; thence easterly along the northerly line of said lot
159, a distance of 120 feet; thence northerly parallel to and
distant 120 feet easterly of the westerly line of Lot 160 of said
division and tract to the mutual boundary line of the County of
Los Angeles and City of Hawthorne as they existed on said date,
said boundary line also being the survey centerline of 135th.
Street (formerly Strawberry Avenue) variable 60 to 65 feet wide;
thence easterly along said boundary line to the centerline of
Crenshaw Boulevard (formerly Cypress Avenue), 100 feet wide;
thence southerly along said last mentioned centerline to the
northerly right of way line of the Dominguez Channel 125 feet
wide; thence southwesterly along said northerly right of way line
to the westerly line of Lot 221,Tract No. 993 as per map recorded
in Book 20, Page 178 of said records; thence northerly in a
direct line to the northwest corner of Lot 222 of said tract 993;
thence westerly in a direct line to the northeast corner of Lot
127 of said tract 993; thence continuing Westerly along the
northerly line of said lot 127 and its westerly prolongation to
the centerline of Lemoli Avenue (formerly Olive Street), 50 feet
-page 11-
10J
Revised Sept. 25,1984
wide; thence southerly along said last mentioned centerline to
its intersection with the easterly prolongation of the souherly
line of Lot 122 of said tract 993; thence westerly in a direct
line to the southeast corner of Lot 72 of said tract- 993; thence
northerly in a direct line to the northeast corner of said lot 72;
thence westerly in a direct line to the southeast c'orner*of Lot 4
of said tract 993; thence• northerly in a direct line to the
northeast. corner of,said'Lot 4 of said Tract 993; thence westerly
along the northerly line of said Lot 4 to the easterly right of
way line of Yukon Avenue, 60 feet wide; thence northerly along
said easterly right of way line to the southerly right of way line
of said Rosecrans Avenue, 10,0 feet wide; thence westerly along
said southerly right of way line to the centerline of Prairie
Avenue, 100 feet wide, said centerline being the mutual boundary
bet':een the Cities of Hawthorne and Lawndale as they existed on
said date; thence northerly, northwesterly, and westerly
following said mutual boundary line, to the northerly line of Lot
978, Burleigh Tract, as per map recorded in Book 13, Pages 122 and
123 of said records; thence continuing westerly in a direct line
to the northwest corner of Lot 980 of said Burleigh Tract; thence
northerly in a direct line to the southwest corner of Lot 882 of
said Burleigh Tract; thence easterly in a direct, line to the
southeast corner of said lot 882; thence northerly to a point on
the easterly line of Lot 877 of said tract, said point lying
113.84 feet southerly of the northeast corner of said lot 877';
thence "easterly parallel to and distant 113.84 feet southerly from
the northerly line of Lot 878 of said Burleigh Tract, a distance
of 44 feet; thence northerly in a direct line to a point on the
northerly line of said Lot 878 being distant 6 feet westerly of
the easterly line of said Lot 878; thence westerly in a direct
line to the northwest corner of said Lot 877 of said Burleigh
Tract; thence northerly in a direct line to the northwest corner
of Lot 490 of said Burleigh Tract; thence easterly in a direct
line to the northeast corner of said lot 490; thence northerly in
a direct line to the northeast corner of Lot 485 of said Burleigh
Tract; thence westerly in a direct line to the northwest corner
of said lot 485; thence northerly in a direct line to a point on
the northerly line of Lot 18 of Tract No. 1418 as per map recorded
in Book 18, Page 147, of said records, said point lying westerly
50 feet from t-he northeast corner of said lot 18; thence westerly
in a direct line to the southeast corner of Lot 2, Burleigh Tract,
as per map recorded in Book' 13; Pages 118 and 119 of said
records,- said point also lying on the westerly right of way line
of Washington Avenue, 60 feet wide; thence northerly along said
westerly right of way line to the southerly right of way line of
E1 Segundo Boulevard, 100 feet wide; thence westerly along said
southerly right of way line to its intersection with the southerly
prolongation of. the easterly right of way line of Birch Avenue, 68
feet wide; thence northerly along said southerly prolongation
and easterly right of way line to the northwest corner of Lot 63
of the First Addition to the Town of Hawthorne, as per map
recorded in Book 9, Page 28, of said records; thence easterly
along t1)e northerly line of Lots 63 and 84 and the easterly
prolongation of said line to its intersection with the easterly
—page 12—
lio
Revised Sept. 25,1984
right of way line of Cedar Avenue, 50 feet wide; thence southerly
in a direct line to the southwest corner .of Lot 113 of said
Addition; thence easterly in a direct line to the southeast
corner of Lot 292 of said Addition; thence northerly in a direct
line to the northeast corner of Lot 45, Block I.of the Town of
Hawthorne Tract as per map recorded in Book 8, Page 158 of said
records; thence easterly in a direct line to the northwest corner
of Lot 12 of said Block I; thence easterly along the northerly
line of Lot 12 of said block and tract to the southerly
prolongation of the westerly line of Lot 7 of said block and
tract;' thence northerly in a direct line to the northwest corner
of Lot 7 of Block H, of said Town of Hawthorne Tract; thence
westerly along the northerly line of Lot 6 of said block and tract
to the southerly prolongation of the easterly line of Lot 45 of
said block and tract; thence northerly in a direct line•to the
northeast corner of Lot 298, Second Addition to the Town of
Hawthorne as per map recorded in Book 9, Page 160, of said
records; thence westerly along the northerly line of Lot 298 of
said tract to the southerly prolongation of the westerly line of
Lot 304 of said tract; thence northerly along the said southerly
prolongation and westerly line of said lot 304 and the northerly
prolongation thereof to the northerly right of way line of 120th
Street (formerly Raymond Avenue), 80 feet wide; thence easterly
along said northerly right of way line to the westerly line of Lot
20 of Tract No. 3044 as per map recorded in Book 29, Page 49 of
said records; thence northerly in a direct line to the southwest
corner of Lot 15 of said tract; thence easterly along the
southerly line of said lot 15 to the westerly right of way line of
Prairie Avenue, 100 feet wide; thence northerly along said
Westerly right of way line to the southeast corner of Lot 1 of
Parcel Map No. 11869 as per map recorded in Parcel *Map Book 115,
Page 89 of said records; thence westerly in a direct line to the
southwest corner of said lot 1; thence northerly in a direct line
to the northwest corner of said lot 1; thence/easterly in a direct
line to the southwest corner of Lot 23 of Tract No. 6713 as per
map recorded in Book 71, Pages 41 and 42 of said records; thence
northerly in a direct line to the northwest corner of Lot 5 of
said tract; thence westerly in a direct line to the southeast
corner of Lot 52 of said tract; thence northerly in a direct line
to the northeast corner of Lot 51 of said tract; thence westerly
in a direct line to the northwest corner of Lot 94 of said tract;
thence continuing westerly in a direct line to the southeast
corner of Lot 266 of 'the Fairfax Park Tract, as per map recorded
in Book 20, Pages 138 and 139 of said records; thence continuing
we.sterly in a direct line to the southeast corner of Lot 74 of
said tract; thence southerly in a direct line to the southeast
corner of Lot 75 of said tract; thence westerly in a direct line
to the northwest corner of Lot 76 of said tract; thence southerly
in a direct line to the northwest corner of Lot 82 of said Fairfax
Park Tract; thence westerly in a direct line to the southeast
corner of Lot 33 of said tract; thence northerly in a direct line
to the northeast corner of Lot 31 of said tract; thence westerly
in a direct line to the southwest corner of Lot 30 said tract;
thence southerly in a direct line to the southwest corner of Lot
—page 13-
L
Revised Sept. 25,1984
48 of said tract; thence easterly along the northerly right of
way line of 118th Street (formerly Wallace Street), 60 feet wide,
a distance of 12.5 feet; thence southerly, parallel to and
distant easterly 132.5 feet from the easterly right of way line of
Hawthorne Boulevard 180 feet aide, to the northerly right of way
line of West 119th. Street,(formerly Kenwood Avenue) 60 feet wide;
thence easterly 'along said northerly right of way line a distance
of 7.5 feet; thence southerly parallel to and distant easterly
140 -feet from the easterly right of way line of said Hawthorne
Boulevard 180 feet wide to the•center3ine of West 120th. Street 80
feet wide; thence westerly along said centerline to the northerly
prolongation of the westerly right of way line of said Hawthorne
Boulevard, variable 170 to 180 feet wide; thence southerly along
said westerly right of way line and southerly and northerly
prolongation thereof to the centerline of said E1 Segundo
Boulevard, 100 feet wide; thence easterly along said centerline
to the northerly prolongation of the easterly line of the westerly
7 feet of lot 14 of said Burleigh Tract as recorded in Book 33
pages 118 and 119 of said records; thence southerly along said
northerly prolongation and easterly line and its southerly
prolongation to the northerly line of Lot 50 of said Burleigh
Tract; thence westerly in a direct line to the northwest corner
of said lot 50; thence southerly in a direct line to the
southwest corner of Lot 95 of said tract; thence easterly in a
direct ••line to the southeast corner of Lot 96 of said tract;
thence southerly in a direct line to the southwest corner of Lot
120 of said tract; thence easterly in a direct line to the
southeast corner of said lot 120; thence southerly in a direct
line to the southeast corner of Lot 151 of said tract; thence
westerly in a direct line to the northwest corner of Lot 238 of
_said, tract; thence southerly __in_ a d_irect� line to the southwest
corner of Lot 161 of Tract_,_�1A.._ ;§ as yer ma __ Zecorded" iri—B-o -o•k
Nag of .e —7 of said records; thence easterly along the souter_Yy
line saidlot 161 to the northerly prolongation of the westerly
line of Lot 160 of said tract; thence southerly in a direct line
to the southwest corner of Lot 132 of said tract; thence easterly
in a direct line to the southeast corner of said lot 132; thence
southerly in a direct line to the southeast corner of Lot 105 of
said tract; thence easterly in a direct line to the southeast
corner of Lot 106 'of said tract;• thence southerly in a direct
line to the southeast corner- of Lot 103 of said tract; thence
westerly in a direct line to the southwest corner of Lot 104 of
said tract 1391; thence southerly in a direct line to the
southwest corner of Lot 48 of said tract; thence easterly along
the southerly line of said -lot 48, a distance of 40 feet; thence
southerly parallel to and distant 40 feet easterly from the
westerly line of Lot 21 of said tract to the northerly right of
way line of said Rosecrans Avenue, variable 98 to 100 feet wide;
thence westerly along said northerly right of way line, a distance
of 40 feet; thence southerly along the southerly prolongation of
the westerly line of said lot 21 to the southerly right of way
line of said Rosecrans Avenue; thence westerly along said
southerly right of way line to a line parallel to and distant 67
feet easterly of the easterly right of way line of Hawthorne
—page 14-
�1
Revised Sept. 25,1984
Boulevard (formerly Railroad Avenue) 195 feet wide; thence
southerly along said last mentioned parallel line to the northerly
line of Lot 1, Block 27 of Lawndale Acres, as per map recorded in
Book 10, Page 122 of said records; thence westerly in a direct
line to the northwest corner of said lot 1; thence northerly
along the easterly right of way line of said Hawthorne Boulevard,
195 feet wide to a point lying southerly 120 feet from the
centerline of Rosecrans Avenue, 100 feet wide; thence westerly
parallel to and southerly 120 feet from the centerline of said
Rosecrans Avenue to the southeast corner of Lot 21 of Block 20,
said Lawndale Acres, as per map recorded in Book 9, Page 122, of
said records; thence northerly along the northerly prolongation
of the easterly lines of Lots 21, 22, and 23 of said block and
tract to the northerly right of way line of said Rosecrans Avenue,
IU0 feet wide; thence westerly along said northerly right of way
line to the westerly line of Lot 306, Tract No. 2049 as per map
recorded in Book 22, Page 1 of said records; thence northerly in
a direct line to the northwest corner of said lot 306; thence
easterly in a direct line to-the northeast corner of Lot 307 of
said tract; thence northerly in a direct line to the northeast
corner of Lot 178 of said tract; thence easterly in a direct line
to the southeast corner of Lot 28 of Block J of Tract No. 6095 as
per map recorded in Book 64, Page 44, of said records; thence
northerly to the northeast corner of Lot 1 of said block H of said
tract;• thence westerly along the northerly line of said lot 1 to
the southerly prolongation of the easterly line of lot 124 of
Ingledale Acres as per map recorded in Book 20, Page 21 of said
records; thence northerly in a direct line to the northeast
corner of Lot 76 of said tract; thence westerly along the
northerly line of said lot 76,• a distance of 4 feet; thence
northerly parallel to and distant 171 feet west from the westerly
right of way line of Hawthorne Boulevard (formerly Burleigh
Avenue), 180 feet wide, to the southerly line of Lot 295 of said,
Ingledale Acres, as per map recorded in Book 20, Pages 182 and 183
of said records; thence easterly to the southeast corner of Lot
295 of said tract; thence northerly to the northeast corner of
said lot 295; thence westerly along the northerly line of said
lot 295, a distance of 8 feet; thence northerly parallel to and
distant 175 feet westerly from said westerly right of way line of
Hawthorne Boulevard 'to the southerly line of Lot 572 of Ingledale
Acres, as per map recorded in Book 21, Pages 78 and 79 of said
records; thence westerly in a direct line to the southwest corner
of Lot 594 of said tract; thence continuing westerly along the
westerly prolongation of the southerly line of said lot 594 to the
easterly line of Lot A of said tract; thence northerly along said
last mentioned easterly line to the southerly right of way line of
said E1 Segundo Boulevard, 100 feet wide; thence westerly along
said southerly right of way line to a point lying distant easterly
265 feet from the easterly right of way line of Inglewood Avnue,
80 feet wide; thence southerly, parallel to and distant 265 feet
easterly from said easterly right of way line to the northerly
line of Lot 543 of said Ingledale Acres; thence westerly along
said last mentioned line to a point lying distant easterly 40
feet from the northeast corner of Lot 541 of said tract; thence
—page 15-
il
Revised Sept. 25,1984
southerly parallel to and distant easterly from the 'easterly line
of said lot 541 and the southerly prolongation thereof to the
southerly right of way line of 129 th. Street, (formerly Maine
Avenue) 40 feet wide; thence westerly along said southerly right
of way line to a point lying distant easterly 105 feet from the
easterly right of way line of Inglewood Avenue 80 feet wide;
thence southerly in a direct line to the southeast corner of Lot
396 of said tract; thence westerly in a direct line to the
northwest corner of Lot 326 of said tract; thence southerly in a
direct line to the southwest corner of said lot'326; thence
easterly to the northerly prolongation of the easterly line of •Lot
32.2 of said tract; thence southerly in a direct line to the
southeast corner of said lot 322; thence westerly in a direct
line to the northwest corner of Lot 261 of said trract; thence
southerly in a direct line to the southeast corner of Lot 144 of
said Ingledale Acres as per map recorded in book 20 page 21 of
said records; thence easterly along the southerly line of Lot 143
of said tract to the northerly prolongation of the easterly line
of Lot 1 of Block A, Tract No. 6095 as per map recorded in Book
64, Page 44 of said records; thence southerly in a direct line to
the southeast corner of Lot 11 of said block and tract;
—page 16— q
1 1 t
'Revised Sept. 25,1984
the southerly line. of said lot 11 to the prolongation Plong
the easterly line of Lot 3 of Block I of said tract; thence
souther-ly in a direct line -to the southeast corner of said lot 3
and block thence westerly, in a direct line to the northwest
corner of Lot 3 of Tract No. 2049 as per map recorded in Book 229
Page 1, of said records; thence southerly in a direct line to the
northeast corner of Lot 123 of said tract; thence easterly in a
direct line to the northeast corner of Lot 140 of'said tract;
thence southerly along the easterly line of said lot 140 to the
northerly right of way line of Rosecrans Avenue 100 feet wide;
thence southerly in a direct line to the intersection of the
southerly right of way line of said Rosecrans Avenue with the
easterly line of lot 2 of tract no. 856 as per map recorded in
Book 16 page 96 of said records; thence southerly in a direct
line to the southeast corner of Lot 10 of said tract; thence
westerly along the southerly line, of said lot 10 to a point
distant easterly 140 feet from the easterly right of way line of
Condon Avenue (formerly Sixth Street), 40 feet wide; thence
northerly parallel to and distant 140 feet easterly from said
easterly right of way line to the northerly line of said lot 30;
thence westerly along said northerly lot line to a point lying
distant easterly 127.26 feet from said easterly right of way line
of Condon Avenue; thence northerly parallel to and distant 127.26
feet easterly from said easterly right of way line to the
northerly line of Lot 7 of said tract; thence westerly along the
northerly fines of Lot 51 6, and 7 of said tract and the
prolongation thereof, to a point lying distant westerly 20 feet
from the centerline of Inglewood Avenue, 80 feet wide, said point
also lying on the mutual boundary line between the Cities of
Hawthorne and Lawndale as they existed on this date; thence
southerly westerly and southerly following the various courses of
said boundary line to a point lying distant southerly 262 feet
from the easterly prolongation of the southerly right of way line
of 147th Street, 80 feet wide; thence westerly parallel to and
distant 262 feet southerly from said southerly right of way line
to the easterly* right -of way line of the San Diego Freeway, 288
feet wide; thence southeasterly along said easterly right of way
line to the centerline of Compton Boulevard 80'feet wide; thence
westerly long said centerline to the true point of beginning.
SUB ARSA B:
Beginning at the center point of Section 11, T3S, R14W, San
Bernardino Base and Meridian; thence westerly along the east -west
centerline of said Section 11 a distance of 40 feet;' thence
southerly along a line parallel to and distant westerly 40 feet
from the north -south center line of said section 11, said parallel
-page 17-
11
Revised Sept. 25,1984
line also being the westerly right of way line of Van Ness Avenue,
80 feet wide, a distance of 750.7 feet (+ or' -) to_the point of
intersection with the northerly right of way line of the Southern
Pacific Railway, said point of intersection tieing the true point
of beginning; thence northerly along said westerly right of way
line to a point lying distant southerly 60 feet from the southerly
right of way line bf 120th Street, 80 feet wide; thence easterly
parallel to and 60 feet southerly from said southerly right of way
line, E distance of 402.7 feet; thence southerly parallel to and
distant 322.7 feet easterly from the easterly right of way line of
said Van Ness Avenue to the northerly right -of -way line of the
Southern Pacific Railway; thence southwesterly along said
northerly right -of -way line to the true point of beginning. If
SUB AREA C:
Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 1 of Tract No. 13523 as
per map recorded in Book 377, Pages 19 and 20 of said records;
thence southerly along the easterly line of said lot and the
southerly prolongation thereof, a distance of 615 feet; thence
easterly parallel to and distant southerly 615 feet from the
southerly line of, E1 Segundo Boulevard 100 feet wide, a distance
of 105 feet; thence southerly parallel to and distant 285 feet
easterly from the easterly line'of Yukon Avenue, variable 50 to 60
feet wide, a distance of 130 feet; thence westerly parallel to
distant 745 feet southerly from said southerly right of way line
to said easterly right of way line of Yukon Avenue; thence
southerly along said easterly right of way line to the easterly
prolongation of the southerly line of 132nd Street, 55 feet wide;
thence westerly along said easterly prolonghation and southerly
right of way line to a point lying distant westerly 90 feet from
the westerly right of way line of said Yukon Avenue, 60 feet wide;
thence' northerly .parallel to and distant westerly 90 feet from
said westerly right of way line to the southerly line of Lot 47 of
Tract No. 874, Division A, as per map recorded in Book 17, Pages
110 and 111 of said records; thence westerly in a direct line to
the southwest corner of said lot 47; thence northerly in a direct
line to the northeast corner of Lot 30 of said tract; thence
westerly along the northerly line of said lot 30 to the easterly
right of way line of Kornblum Avenue, variable 40-to 50 feet wide;
thence southerly along said easterly right of way line, a distance
of 78 feet; thence westerly parallel to and distant southerly 78
feet from the northerly line of Lot 29 of said tract to the
westerly line of said lot �29; thence northerly in a direct line
to the northeast corner of Lot 28 of said tract; -thence westerly
in a direct line to the southwest corner of Lot 20 of said tract;
thence northerly along the easterly right of way line of Doty
Avenue, variable 40 to 60 feet wide, to the westerly prolongation
of the northerly right of way line of 130th Street, 20 feet wide;
thence easterly along said westerly prolongation and northerly
right of way line to the westerly line of Lot 6 of the North
Monets Garden Lands Tract as per map recorded in Book 5, Page 54,
of said records-; thence northerly along said westerly line of lot
-page 18- i 1 ;�
Revised Sept. 27,1984
6 and prolongation thereof, to the northerly right of way line of
said E1 Segundo Boulevard, 100 feet wide; thence easterly along
said last 'mentioned northerly right of way line to the southerly
prolongation of the westerly right of way line of Yukon Avenue 50
feet' wide; thence northerly along said last mentioned southerly
prolongation and westerly right of way line to the southerly right
of way line of the -Southern Pacific Railway, 80 feet wide; thence
easterly along said southerly.right of way line a distance of 480
feet; thence southerly parallel to and distant easterly 430 feet
from the easterly right of way' line of said Yukon Avenue to the
southerly right of way line of said E1 Segundo Boulevard; thence
westerly along said last mentioned right of way line to true point
of beginning.
SUB AREA D:
Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 1 of Block 45 of Lawndale
Acres as per map recorded in Book 10, Page 122 of of said records;
thence easterly along the southerly line of Lat 8 of said block
and tract and the easterly prolongation thereof, to the easterly
right' of way line of Prairie Avenue (formerly Avenue Six), 100
feet wide; thence. southerly along said easterly right of way line
to the southwest corner of Lot 357 of Tract No. 17639 as per map
recorded in Book 436, Pages 5 thru 9 inclusive of said records;
thence easterly in a direct line to the southeast corner of Lot
352 of said tract; thence southerly in a direct line to the
southwest corner of Lot 343 of said tract; thence easterly along
the southerly line of said lot 343 to the northerly prolongation
of the westerly line of Lots 373 through 380, inclusive of Tract
No. 15754 as per map recorded in Book 409, Pages 42 through 50 of
said records, said line also being the easterly right of way 1•ine
of the 30 foot alley as shown on said tract; thence southerly
along said last mentioned easterly right of -way line to the
northerly line of Lot 445 of said tract; thence westerly along
the southerly right of way line of said 30 foot alley and the
westerly prolongation thereof, to a point lying distant 20 feet
easterly from the westerly right of way line of said Prairie
Avenue, 100 feet wide; thence southerly parallel to and distant
20 feet easterly of said westerly right of way line to the
easterly prolongation of the southerly line of Lot 18 of Block 46
of said Lawndale Acres Tract; thence westerly along said easterly
prolongation and southerly line to the south west corner of said
lot 18; thence northerly along a line parallel to and distant
115.5 feet westerly from said westerly right of way line of
Prairie Avenue to the southerly right of way line of.Compton
Boulevard ( formerly Chicago Avenue), 80 feet wide; thence
northerly in a direct line to the intersection of the northerly
right of way line of said Compton Boulevard with the Westerly line
of lot 5 of said tract; thence northerly in a direct line to the
true point of beginning.
SUB AREA E:
-page 19-
1 1 /
Revised Sept. 27,1984
Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 74, Tract No. 6441 as per
map recorded in Book 70, Page 69 of said records; thence easterly
in a direct line to the northeast corner of Lot 75 of said tract;
thence northeasterly to the northwest corner of Lot '6 of Tract No.
1543 as per map recorded in Book 18, Page 198 of said records;
thence easterly in a direct line to the northeast corner of said
lot 6; thence southerly in a direct line to the southeast corner
of Lot 10 of said tract; thence continuing southerly to the
northeast corner of Lot 53 of Tract No. 1084 as per map recorded
in Book 17, -Pages 82 and 83 of said records; thence continuing
southerly along the easterly line of Lots 53 through 62 inclusive
of said tract and the southerly prolongation thereof, to the
southerly right of way line of 120th Street (formerly Raymond
Avenue), 80 feet wide; thence westerly along said southerly right
of way line to the easterly right of way line of Inglewood Avenue,
80 feet wide; thence southerly along said easterly right of way
line to the easterly prolongation of the northerly right of way
line of 121st Street, 60 feet wide; thence westerly along said
easterly prolongation and northerly right of way line to the
southwest corner of Lot 26 of Tract No. 13435 as per map recorded
in Book 270, Page 48 of said records; thence northerly in a
direct line to the southeast corner of Lot 24 of said tract;
thence westerly in'a direct line to the southwest corner of Lot 23
of said tract; thence northerly along the westerly line of said
lot 23 and the northerly prolongation thereof, to the northerly
right of way line of 120th Street, 76 feet wide; thence easterly
along said northerly right of way line to the westerly line Lot 2,
of Tract 2704 as per map recorded in Book 27, Page 52 of said
records; thence northerly in a direct line to the northwest
corner of Lot 151 of said tract; thence continuing northerly
along the northerly prolongation of the westerly line of said lot
to the northerly right of way line of 118th Street (formerly
Wallace Street), 50 feet wide; thence easterly along said
northerly right of way line to the southwest. corner of Lot 112 of
said Tract No. 6441 as per map recorded'in Book 70, Page 69 of
said records; thence northerly in a direct line to the true point
of beginning.
SUB AREA F:
Beginning at the southwesterly corner of Lot 63 of Tract No. 874,
Division C, as per map recorded in Book 18, Page 136 of said
records; thence northerly in a direct line to the northwest
corner of Lot 67 of said tract and division;' thence easterly in a
direct line to the northeast corner of said lot 67; thence
northerly in a direct line to the northeast corner of Lot 68 of
said division and tract; thence easterly in a direct line to the
northeast corner of Lot 93 of-said division and tract; thence
southerly in a direct line to the southeast corner of Lot 95 of
said division and tract; thence westerly in a direct line to the
easterly right of way line of Lemoli Avenue, variable 40 to 45
feet wide; thence southerly along said easterly right of way line
to the southwest corner of Lot 98 of said tract; thence westerly
in a direct line to the true point of beginning.
JI0
-page 20-
EXHIBIT D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ADDED AREA
HAW _AmdRedevPlan_ v3 doc Exhibit D 8/14/03
03030/0028
1 j
Area A
AMENDING BOUNDARY OF HAWMORNE-REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT No. 2
PROPOSED NEW AREA
Beginning at the most northerly corner of Lot 34 of Tract No. 16663, in the City
of Hawthorne, County of Los Angeles, as shown on map recorded in Book 511, Pages 15
through 13, inclusive, of Maps, records of said County, said comer being on the
southeasterly line of the Pacific Electric Railway Company's 80.00, foot right of way, said
comer being a common point in the boundaries of the City of El Segundo and the City of
Hawthorne, as both boundaries existed on April 15, 2003 and having established grid
coordinates of North 1,791,789.84 feet, Easting 6,449,118.06 feet, Zone 5 of the California
State Coordinate System (NAD83); thence along said southeasterly line, South 62 °25'00"
West 2659.14 feet to the westerly line of the northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 3
South, Range 14 West of the Rancho Sausal Redondo as per map fded in Case No. 11629
of the Superior Court of the State of Califomia; thence Along said westerly line. North
00 013'08" East 1188.48 feet to a line paral lei with and 25.00 feet northwesterly of the
southeasterly line of the land described in Book 4215, Page 316 of said Deeds; thence
along said parallel line North 11 021'00" East 421.61 feet to the northerly line of said
Section 17; thence along said northerly line, South 89 °45'00" East 1211.46 feet to the
southerly prolongation of the westerly line of Isis Avenue, 60 feet wide, as shown on Tract
No 14749, in the City of El Segundo, as per map recorded in Book 368, pages 18 through
22, inclusive of said Maps; thence along said southerly prolongation, South 00 °11'19"
Wesr 50.00 feet to a line parallel with and 50.00'feer southerly of said northerly line of
Section 17; thence along said parallel line, South 89 045'00" East 477.18 feet to the
westerly line of the `Triangle No. 1 Annexation" to the City of Hawthorne as same existed
on March 14,1957, said westerly line being the beginning of a non - tangent curve, concave
northeasterly, having a radius of 140.00 feet and to which beginning a radial line bears
South 89 °27'05" West; thence along said most westerly line of the ' 17tiangle No. 1
Annexation" to the City of Hawthorne, the following three courses: Southeasterly 245.85
feet along said curve, through a central angle of 98 °34'09 ", North 81 023'56" East 348.02
feet, South 18 °34'12" East 250.23 feet to the point of beginning.
Containing an area of 50.10 acres, more or less.
1S Z�3
bent C. Olson, PIS 5490 Date
e
Psomas
Paige 1 of 1 No. 5490
w.%LAApat54i56tit F- AO2oi0=v ve * EitR.9-30 2tt0a �e
y�LAt�OVtF.DE V$LOPMFNr�{A Wn{ORNtidac
April 15, 200
rDC jdc 9rc ct1�i'
Area B
GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION
AMENDING BOUNDARY OF HAWTH'ORNE REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT Igo.
ADDITIONAL PROPOSED NEW AREA
Beginning at the intersection of the southerly line of Section 7, Township 3 South, Range
14 West of the Rancho Sausal Redondo as per map filed in Case No. 11£29 of the Superior
Court of the State of California and a line parallel with and 1415.20 feet westerly of the
easterly line of said Section 7 and having established grid coordinates of North
1,792,168.43 feet, Easting 6,445349.26 feet, Zone 5 of the California State Coordinate
System (NAD83); thence northerly along said parallel line, North 00 °00'53" East 2008.61
feet; thence South 89 159'07" East 339.18 feet; thence South 00 000'53" West, 182.00 feet;
thence South 89 °59'07" East 289.64 feet; thence Sauth 00 °.00'53" West 67.93 feet; thence
South 89 °58'15" East 458.82 feet; thence North 49 °06'45" East 38.19 feet; thence South
89058'15" East 73.81 feet; thence North 67 °20' 15" East 38.39 feet; thence North
89 °59'22" East .59.86 feet; thence North 89 °59'22" East 101.20 feet; thence South
00 110'18" West 360.00 feet; thence South 89 °59'22" West 100.21 feet; thence South
00 100'53" West 1390.25 feet; thence South 89 °54'07" East 186.40 feet; thence North
00 010'18" East 1750.61 feet; thence North 89 059'22" East 118.00 feet; thence South
00° 10' 18" West 78.14 feet; thence South 00° 10' 18" West 80.00 feet; thence South
001 10'18" West 228.85 feet; thence North 89 °54'04" West 12.03 feet to the beginning of a
non - tangent curve, concave southeasterly, having a radius of 25.00 feet and to which
beginning a radial line bears North 00 °05'56" East; thence southwesterly 39.24 feet along
Page 1 of 2
W 1LAAFB\ SFI' E_ B\ TtYR VEMAFCO \REDEVEI.OPMEN'PL_HANVTKQRNE.dm
May G, 2003
JDC:Idc 1 211
said curve through a central angle of 89 055'38 "; South 00 °10'18" West 67.03 feet; thence
North 89 °54'04" West 6.00 feet; thence South 00 °10'18" West 1321,85 feet; thence North
89 054'07" West 50.57 feet; thence South 11 °18'32" West 50.97 feet; thence North
89 °54'07" West 99.45 feet to the beginning of a non- tangent curve concave to the west,
having a radius of 2834.93 feet and to which beginning a radial line bears South 83 059'40"
East; thence southerly 18.10 feet along said curve through a central angle of 00 °21'57 ";
thence North 89 °54'07" West 253.27 feet; thence North 48 °02'05" West 8.99 feet; thence
North 89 °54'07" West 457.16 feet; thence South 00°05'53" West 10.00 feet; thence North
89 054'07" West 150.66 feet; thence North 78 °10'58" West 31.66 feet; thence North
85 005'08" West 18.69 feet; thence North 89 °54'07" West 322.97 feet; thence North
66 °02'02" West 158.17 feet to the Point of Beginning
Containing an area of 61.09 acres, more or less.
Psomas
Page 2 of 2
Date
C.
�QO oyo�
a No. 54'30
* \ Exp.9 -30 -2004
W:U. AAFB'. 3frE _B\SLlRYEY\L.AFCO%REDEVELOPMEN 7_HAWTHORNE.doc
May 6, 2003
J DC.Jdc 122-
EXHIBIT E
AMENDED LIST OF PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND
ACTIVITIES
1. Land acquisition, construction, maintenance, operations and
administration costs to provide Senior Citizen Housing.
2. Acquisition, construction and landscaping of off - street parking spaces.
3. Commercial rehabilitation loan and grant fund, either in the form of an
interest write down for a low cost loan or some type of a grant.
4. Industrial rehabilitation loan and grant fund, either in the form of an
interest write down for a low cost loan or some type of a grant.
5. Residential rehabilitation loans or grants, either in the form of an interest
write down for a low cost loan or some type of a grant.
6. Land write down pool for commercial and industrial development.
7. Replacement housing pool for dilapidated units in Project Area.
8. Construction of new streets and reconstruction of existing asphalt concrete
roadways. Includes clearing and grubbing, removal, hauling and disposal
of excess material, raising of manholes and valve boxes to grade, grading
and fine grading, and construction of structural section.
9. Storm drainage improvements - includes cutting of pavement, trenching
and backfill, repaving, installation of all storm drains and appurtenances.
10. Alley improvements - includes clearing and grubbing, removal, hauling
and disposal of excess material, raising of manholes and valve boxes to
grade, grading and fine grading, installation of valley gutter, and
construction of structural section.
11. Construction and replacement of curb, gutter and sidewalk - includes
clearing and grubbing, sawcutting of existing pavement, removal, hauling
and disposal of excess material and construction of concrete curb, gutter,
sidewalk and driveway.
HAW _AmdRedevPlan_ v3 doc Exhibit E 8/14/03
03030/0028
12. Construction of water improvements - includes cutting of pavement,
trenching and backfill, repaving, installation of all sewer lines and
appurtenances.
13. Construction of sanitary sewer improvement - includes cutting of
pavement, trenching, backfill, repaving, installation of all sewer lines and
appurtenances.
14. Construction of traffic signals - includes all work necessary for this
installation and upgrading of traffic signals and signal systems.
15. Recreation facilities - includes all work necessary to construct or upgrade
facilities.
16. Land acquisition for development of commercial and industrial facilities.
17. Public Building - land acquisition and construction of facilities necessary
to provide for the safety and welfare of the general public.
18. Improvements to provide mobility for the handicapped.
19. Undergrounding electrical utility lines.
20. Hazardous waste/ materials removal and remediation.
21. Provision of landscape screening including sound walls.
22. Civic Center landscape
Complete landscape design integrating civic center buildings and parking
lot areas. This will include soil preparation, irrigation, removal, hauling,
walk pavements, parking lot improvements, seating areas with park
setting, lighting, trees, shrubs, ground- covers, painting and
appurtenances.
23. Main gateways
Includes cutting of pavement, installation of over - the - roadway main
gateway signs welcoming people to the City of Hawthorne, having a
maximum height of thirty (30) feet, vertical clearance of seventeen (17)
feet, illuminated and stylish.
HAW _AmdRedevPlan_v3 doc 6 8/14/03
03030/0028
1I `t
24. Landscape median at entrances to City
Includes demolition, hauling, installation of soft and hard surfaces,
irrigation, lighting and plantings. _
25. Landscape parkways to create park walk and quiet park across the street
Includes demolition, hauling, installation of soft and hard surfaces,
irrigation, lighting, seating areas in park -like setting, trees, ground shrubs
and area signs.
26. Landscape Hawthorne Boulevard
Includes design parkway planting for better visibility to storefront, cutting
of parkway, hauling, installation of irrigation lines and appurtenances,
hard and soft surfaces, seating areas, trees, ground shrubs and signs.
27. Linear Park on Excess Freeway Right Of Way Land
Includes design, grading, installation of soft and hard surfaces, access
roads, bathrooms, and utility storage rooms, irrigation, barbeques, trees,
ground shrubs and area signs.
28. International Business District
Provides a partial low interest loan or grant for a complete renovation of
commercial buildings along major boulevard to create international
business area; complete with street shops, cafes, entertainment areas, etc.,
comprising various European themes.
29. Design and construction of replacement facilities for the Los Angeles Air
force Base
30. Various other public facilities and activities as may be determined
necessary and essential.
HAW_ AmdRedevP1an_v3.doc 7 8/14/03
03030/0028
121
z
❑ LL
Z m
U' J
Lu
W FO
01--
ix
U�
3
E
I
n
0
0
N
a
F
N
b
7
Q
W
0
N
Q
J
Q
O
a
IL
Q
LL
O
w
❑
w
co
N
N
U!
IU m mN m "V BOO Or
m (N(Dm C-4 nn arum 9iamv e
m mrfV O C7m IOm n Y7n Om W) '
m com�m Or mv) - o mono cO
r m�nanv me nnoN vnQm��Onm o
YmN�N 2M R�Om7 c4 1�'Wn
N
w
z LL
1=L ° W
w Z D U a
W
° �y
a K
LLLLLL"' z " z �+ w
(O� ° 22 Gr
U ~ Z Z¢ Z° r Z W 5zz ° O
z° 0 0 O Q LLUa w i
QQO z Ur H H z F LL m ru F J U W W U 7 7 a fZQn
z W w yC� K K Q Oro R w m z z° U V w D ~ ~' 4
°_�ww?m�ranNz_(�_N a0ji"LLaza?R' rcU -
w'�EwW-' ga °t °,rcoa�yrr�0awwz 3
w 4~ W Q: W F F� O Z U z,~z� 7 W i m F j Z z N W w w W Q
uj
i W U f Q _J W a J W p.' IUL UU CCCC' Y Z Z 1-
w w o w O z z z 0° O N a w U Q J a p r a a
0� � n� d U a a a 2 2� z U� U? a 3 c Q i w� 3 z 0
rn p p_ p 80,00
cp
O O O O O -^ - - - -
m -- N M M O �i u�'i r$ O A
CV O
O
N
H
Z
W
z
Z
J
Q
0
F
W
O
1A
Y
U
W
S
U
0
O
Y �V
i r it
Q
w
d
N
Q
G
O
r
H
yyo
U
N
d ✓ E
U
O
n xa m n
m
h
?
m u «
m5p
U
F
°
d
E
�
ado
a
c
m
m
`
d d '$ m
p w 0
a
m
v
$
E a $
Q
CL
E
s c o w
n
CL d
CL
m
d L N C m
p
d
N
adi
O
C
a
O N C m
O
a m
fi
8
�lao0U
m
y9EFmm
c
a
12
N 0
N
{U0 1qSp.
�i
d
C
T .0
W �'
°d
m
y p 0
?�°aam
'-"
m
v
CD
m
m
a-
10
.c
m
db2�r
c m m m
a
w
U
a
$' v
(D v
m N 3
f
�Ce
co
o
Fi a
CO S
d Ly�
:E
Y
ff O
a
E d is O
C
N
w
w 0
gw o�
o
�i
Odom
d y
of
w
ac
d
rnU) E
m
t~»
v
z OZ m-
ix 0
1
o
o =�
U
0
2
Uo
w
a"
C E c
cisdm
C
a:
❑
LL
LL
O
f3
N
0
O
wz
Q W
0
�
`o
�,
LL
w
w Q
3
0
Q) U
0 LL U
Ir
LL
ii
Q
❑
i r it
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER
7/25/2003 THROUGH 8/07/2003
Date
Payee
Amount
Description
7/30/03
Health Comp
1,31748
Weekly claims 7/25
7/30/03
US Bank
14,999 97
ABAG payment
7/31/03
Employment Development
37,134 77
State Taxes PR 3
7/31/03
IRS
187,135 98
Federal Taxes PR 3
8/1/03
Chase Bank
44,837 50
Siemens Credit Corporation
8/4/03
Federal Reserve
25000
Employee Savings Bonds EE
8/4/03
Federal Reserve
65000
Employee Savings Bonds 1
8/6/03
Health Comp
1,13147
Weekly claims 8/1
7/25 - 8/7/03
Workers Comp Activity
13,208 43
SCRMA checks issued
DATE OF RATIFICATION: 8119/03
TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE:
Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by
300,665 60
8- -7- O3
Date
�-- // -6i
Date
Date
Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo
300,665.60
I2 x
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 5, 2003 — 5:00 P.M.
5:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER — Mayor Gordon at 5:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Gordon -
Present
Mayor ProTem Jacobs -
Present
Council Member Gaines -
Absent
Council Member McDowell -
Present
Council Member Wernick -
Present
NEW BUSINESS
Appointment of Real Property Negotiator. Recommend action is to appoint the City
Manager, Mary Strenn, as the City's real property negotiator to acquire property located at
APN 4138 - 010 -010, 4138 - 012 -800, 4138 - 012 -900, 902 & 904, 4138 - 011 -019, 006 and 036.
MOVED by Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs, SECONDED by Council Member Wernick to appoint City
Manager Mary Strenn as real property negotiator to acquire property located at APN 4138 -010-
010, 4138 - 012 -800, 4138 - 012 -900, 902 & 904, 4138 - 011 -019, 006 and 036. MOTION PASSED
BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 3/0. COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES ABSENT AND COUNCIL
MEMBER MCDOWELL NOT PARTICIPATING DUE A POTENTIAL CONFLICT DUE TO
BUSINESS INTERESTS.
CLOSED SESSION:
The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act
(Government Code Section §54960, et seq.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real
Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation;
and /or discussing matters covered under Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel); and /or
conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators; as follows:
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a)) — 3
matters.
Bressi v. City of El Segundo, LASC No. BC288292
Bressi v. City of El Segundo, LASC No. BC288293
Ganey v. Haffley /Haffley v. City of El Segundo, LASC No. YC 045092
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(b): -0- potential case (no
further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government
Code §54956.9(c): -1- matter.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 5, 2003
PAGE NO. �1
DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) — None.
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54957.6) — 3 matters
Labor Negotiators: Bruce Barsook and Mary Strenn, City Manager
Bargaining Units: Police Officers' Association and Firefighters' Association
Conference with City's Labor Negotiator, City Manager, regarding Management/Confidential
employee group (unrepresented)
Labor Negotiator: Mary Strenn, City Manager
Bargaining Unit: Supervisory and Professional Employees Association
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8): -1- matter
City Negotiators: Mary Strenn, City Manager; Property: APN 4138 - 010 -010, 4138 - 012 -800, 4138-
012 -900, 902 & 904, 4138 - 011 -019, 006 and 036; Negotiating Parties: Property Owners; Under
Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment. COUNCIL MEMBER MCDOWELL NOT
PARTICIPATING IN CLOSED SESSION DISCUSIONS WITH REAL PROPERTY NETOGIATOR
DUE TO A POTENTIAL CONFLICT.
SPECIAL MATTERS — None.
Council moved to open session at 6:55 p.m.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 5, 2003
PAGE NO. 2
.1 11
1 2 v
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 5, 2003 — 7:00 P.M.
7:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER — Mayor Gordon at 7:00 p.m.
INVOCATION — Fr. Alexei Smith — St. Andrew Russian Greek Catholic Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Council Member Nancy Wernick
PRESENTATIONS —
(a) Council Member Wernick presented a Commendation to Bernice Whitcomb, E. Jane
Conley, and Robert Sowder, outgoing Directors on the El Segundo Library Board of
Trustees for their service to the community.
(b) Council Member McDowell presented a Proclamation proclaiming Saturday, August 16,
2003 as Volunteer Recognition Day in El Segundo and inviting its volunteers to a
celebration in their honor on this day from 11:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
(c) Mayor ProTem Jacobs presented a Commendation to the El Segundo Ministerial
Association for its spiritual and moral support of the work of the City Council and of the
people of our community
ROLL CALL
Mayor Gordon -
Present
Mayor ProTem Jacobs -
Present
Council Member Gaines -
Absent
Council Member McDowell-
Present
Council Member Wernick -
Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City
Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify
themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of $250. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow
Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after
Public Communications is closed.
Dan Ehler Chamber of Commerce Executive Director, announced their support of the Air Force
Base projects. He also spoke regarding the work done on the circulation plan and presented a
communication from the Board of Directors.
Joe Brandin, resident, spoke on items 10, 13, and 9. He further questioned the procedure for the
award of contracts.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 5, 2003
PAGE NO 3
1 J IJ
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda by title only.
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Wernick to read
all ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda by title only. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES ABSENT.
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS
1. Consideration and possible action (Public Hearing) regarding a Resolution of the City of El
Segundo, California, finding the City to be in conformance with the annual Congestion
Management Program (CMP) and adopting the annual CMP Local Implementation Report,
in accordance with California Government Code Section 65089.
Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a public hearing regarding a
Resolution of the City of El Segundo, California, finding the City to be in conformance with
the annual Congestion Management Program (CMP) and adopting the annual CMP Local
Implementation Report, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65089.
He asked if proper notice of the hearing was done in a timely manner and if any written
correspondence had been received. Clerk Mortesen stated that proper notice was
completed and no written communications had been received by the City Clerk's Office.
Mary Strenn, City Manager, gave a report.
Council consensus to close the public hearing.
Mark Hensley, City Attorney, read by title only:
RESOLUTION NO. 4316
A RESOLUTION FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP)
AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 65089.
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs to adopt
Resolution No. 4316 finding the City to be in compliance with the Congestion Management
Program (CMP) and adopting the CMP Local Implementation Report pursuant to
Government Code § 65089. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0.
COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES ABSENT.
2. Consideration and possible action (Public Hearing) regarding a request to construct nine
townhouse -style condominium "live /work" units with: (1) a Variance request to allow access
to the site from Grand Avenue; (2) a Zone Text Amendment, which would allow a 15 foot
front yard setback on lots with a depth of less than 140 feet in the MDR Zone and a
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 5, 2003
PAGE NO 4
J
definition of a "live /work" use; (3) a subdivision request to allow the construction of nine
townhouse -style "live /work" units through Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 54134; and (4) a
Smoky Hollow Site Plan request that would activate of the Medium Density Residential Zone
for the property.
Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a public hearing) regarding a
request to construct nine townhouse -style condominium "live /work" units with: (1) a
Variance request to allow access to the site from Grand Avenue; (2) a Zone Text
Amendment, which would allow a 15 foot front yard setback on lots with a depth of less than
140 feet in the MDR Zone and a definition of a "live /work" use; (3) a subdivision request to
allow the construction of nine townhouse -style "live /work" units through Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 54134; and (4) a Smoky Hollow Site Plan request that would activate of the
Medium Density Residential Zone for the property.
He asked if proper notice of the hearing was done in a timely manner and if any written
correspondence had been received. Clerk Mortesen stated that proper notice was
completed and no written communications had been received by the City Clerk's Office.
Mary Strenn stated that the Developer had requested a continuation of the Public Hearing.
MOVED by Council Member Wernick, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to
continue the Public Hearing to August 19, 2003. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS
VOICE VOTE. 4/0. COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES ABSENT
NOTE THAT MAYOR GORDON AND COUNCIL MEMBER MCDOWELL DID NOT LEAVE
DIAS DUE TO A POTENTIAL CONFLICT AS NO ACTUAL DISCUSSION OR DECISIONS
WERE MADE ON AGENDA ITEM 2.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
3. Consideration and possible action regarding a progress report on the update to the
Circulation Element of the General Plan.
Paul Garry, Acting Planning Manager, gave a report.
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Wernick to:
(a) Use 1,600 vehicles per hour and a 5% inefficiency factor for lane capacities.
(b) Defer action on preparing interim year projections.
(c) Incorporate 850,000 square feet of development potential (Honeywell) into project list.
(d) Use 50% of building FAR regarding recyclable buildings.
(f) Include two -way operation of Nash and Douglas Streets as a base year condition.
(g) Include deletion of Grand and Mariposa Avenue extensions from Douglas Street to Aviation
Boulevard into traffic model.
(h) Incorporate future east -west and north -south roadway extensions on Honeywell property as
a base year condition.
(i) Direct staff to begin FAR scenario traffic forecasts based 0.8, 1.0 and 1.3 FAR in the CO and
MU -N Zone.
(j) Run operational analysis as a demonstration on one corridor.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 5, 2003
PAGE NO. 5
MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES
ABSENT.
MOVED by Mayor Pro Tem Jacobs, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to:
(e) Add transit assumptions by type into calculations. In addition include ICS Credit of 10%
based on implementation of an intelligent traffic system.
MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES
ABSENT.
MOVED by Council Member Wernick, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to:
(i) Direct staff to begin FAR scenario traffic forecasts based 0.8, 1.0 and 1.3 FAR in the CO and
MU -N Zone.
MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES
ABSENT.
City Manager to report at September 2, 2003 City Council meeting if consultant cannot
complete the calculations for consideration at the September 16, 2003 meeting.
4. Consideration and possible action regarding adopting a new Resolution of Application to the
Local Agency Formation Commission for Los Angeles County ( LAFCO) and Reorganization
Agreement between Hawthorne, El Segundo and the developer with respect to the Los
Angeles Air Force Base project.
Mark Hensley, City Attorney, read by title only:
RESOLUTION NO. 4317
RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
AUTHORIZING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO INITIATE
PROCEEDINGS FOR THE REORGANIZAION OF TERRITORY
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs to adopt LAFCO
Resolution of Application No. 4317 and approval of Reorganization Agreement No 3208.
MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOICE VOTE: AYES: MAYOR GORDON, MAYOR
PRO TEM JACOBS, COUNCIL MEMBER MCDOWELL; NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER WERNICK;
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES. 3/1/1.
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - NONE
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a
call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next
heading of business.
5. Approved Warrant Numbers 2534794 to 2535206 on Register No. 20 in the total amount of
$1,914,228.08 and Wire Transfers from 7/4/2003 through 7/24/2003 in the total amount of
$1,496,040.53 and authorized staff to release. Ratified: Payroll and Employee Benefit
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 5, 2003
PAGE NO 6
133
checks; checks released early due to contracts or agreement; emergency disbursements
and /or adjustments; and wire transfers.
6. PULLED FROM AGENDA BY CITY CLERK
7. Approved Resolution No. 4318 authorizing the annual destruction of identified records in
accordance with the provisions of § 34090 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
8. PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCIL MEMBER WERNICK
9. Awarded Contract No. 3209 to Harris & Associates, lowest responsible bidder, for
Infrastructure Valuation Consulting Services related to the implementation of Governmental
Accounting Standard Board (GASB) Statement 34. Authorized the City manager to execute
a standard professional services agreement on behalf of the City.
10. PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCIL MEMBER WERNICK
11. Adopt Resolution No. 4319 providing for the payment of compensation to executive and
management level employees serving during extended emergency services under the City's
Emergency Operations Plan.
12. Waived the formal bidding process per the Municipal Code for the purchase and installation
of a Range Ball Dispenser at the Lakes Golf Course on a sole source basis and authorized
the City Manager to execute Contract No. 3210 between the City and Range Servant
America (manufacturer). Purchase and installation will come from the remaining FY 2002-
2003 Golf Course capital outlay budget, not to exceed $16,000.
13. Consideration and possible action to waive the formal bidding process on the purchase of
13 Automatic Vehicle Locator (AVL) status - mapping systems, RADCOM client licenses,
antennas, and related equipment, for the Police Department Patrol Division using funds
from the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) account. Fiscal impact is
approximately $19,604 in grant funds.
MAYOR REQUESTED THIS ITEM BE DELAYED TWO WEEKS
14. Received and filed report. Accepted $160,232.41 in cumulative grant funding from the State
Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) and County of Los Angeles Office of
Emergency Management (OEM). Fiscal Impact: $160,232.41 which will be fully
reimbursable. Authorized Administrative Services Department to establish an account for
the purchase of grant - related equipment. Authorized the Fire Department to coordinate the
acquisition and purchase of equipment as authorized under the grant.
15. PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCIL MEMBER WERNICK
16. Adopted Resolution No. 4321 approving the Emergency Management Mutual Aid (EMMA)
Plan.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 5, 2003
PAGE NO 7
i .� y
17. Approved cost sharing Agreement No. 3211 between the Cities of El Segundo and
Manhattan Beach for Rosecrans Avenue Improvements between Sepulveda Boulevard and
Highland Avenue. (Estimated cost to El Segundo - $250,000) Authorized the City Manager
to execute on behalf of the City.
18. Awarded Contract No. 3212 to Civil Works Corporation for the 2003 -2004 Annual Contract
for P.C.C. Curb, Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk and other minor improvements — Project No.
PW 03 -07. (Fiscal Impact $50,000) Authorized the City Manager to execute the contract on
behalf of the City.
19. Authorized an additional $30,000 to the City -CBM Contract No. 3019 for providing
construction inspection services for the Grand Avenue /Sepulveda Boulevard intersection
improvement project — Approved Capital Improvement Program. (Estimated Cost $30,000)
Authorize the City Manager to authorize an additional $30,000 to the City -CBM contract.
20. Accepted as complete the project for City Hall Improvements — Phase 1 — Approved Capital
Improvement Program — Project No. PW 01 -17 (Project Cost $210,861). Approved Change
Order No. 1 in the amount of $43,656. Authorized the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's
Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's Office.
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Wernick to approve
consent items 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS
VOICE VOTE. 4/0. COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES ABSENT AND MAYOR GORDON
ABSTAINING ON ITEM 19.
CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA
8. Consideration and possible action regarding the presentation of the FY 2003 -04 Preliminary
Operating Budget and Five Year Capital Improvement Project Plan.
MOVED by Council Member Wernick, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to receive
and file the FY 2003 -04 Preliminary Operating Budget and Five -year Capital Improvement
Project Plan. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. COUNCIL MEMBER
GAINES ABSENT.
10. Consideration and possible action regarding expanding the scope of services of contract to
Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates for professional services to conduct financial advisory
services for the Air Force Base Project (Fiscal Impact $16,700).
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs to expand
the scope of services of Contract No. 3101A to Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates for
professional services to conduct financial advisory services for the Air Force Base Project.
MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: MAYOR GORDON, MAYOR PRO
TEM JACOBS, COUNCIL MEMBER MCDOWELL; NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER
WERNICK; ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES. 3/1/1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 5, 2003
PAGE NO 8
1
1 � �l
15. Consideration and possible action regarding adopting of the new City of El Segundo SEMS
Emergency Operations Plan (EOP). This plan has been approved by the Governor's Office
of Emergency Services (EOS). Fiscal Impact: None
MOVED by Council Member Wernick, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to
adopted Resolution No. 4320 approving new City of El Segundo SEMS Emergency
Operations Plan (EOP). MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0.
COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES ABSENT.
F. NEW BUSINESS — NONE
G. REPORTS — CITY MANAGER — NONE
H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY — NONE
REPORTS — CITY CLERK — Noted that new speaker timer had been installed in the
Council Chamber.
REPORTS — CITY TREASURER — NONE
K. REPORTS — CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member McDowell — Spoke regarding the South Bay Calendar on the Web at
www.southbaycities.com.
Council Member Wernick — Reported on the Monterey, League of California Cities Conference.
Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs — NONE
Mayor Gordon — Update on LAX efforts at the Council Meeting on September 2, 2003. Also
reported on the 310 area code split.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have receive value of $50 or more to communicate to the City
Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify
themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of $250. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow
Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after
Public Communications is closed.
Julie Stolnack, resident and President of Rotary Club, thanked the Council and City for their
support for the "Movie in the Park" on Saturday.
Joe Brandin, resident, spoke regarding his concern on campaign finance.
Jack Kenton, resident, spoke regarding the 9/80 work week in the City.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 5, 2003
PAGE NO 9
4
Steve Bradford, Southern California Edison, spoke about the rate reduction of about 8% for
residents and various percentages for businesses.
Ted Dickton, resident, spoke regarding the Mayors bid for the State Assembly, energy, and his
health.
MEMORIALS — Raymond P. Hardner, longtime resident and retired City employee.
CLOSED SESSION - NONE
ADJOURNMENT at 9:10 p.m.
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 5, 2003
PAGE NO is
13�
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JULY 15, 2003 — 5:00 P.M.
5:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER — Mayor Gordon at 5:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Gordon -
Present
Mayor ProTem Jacobs -
Present
Council Member Gaines -
Present
Council Member McDowell-
Present
Council Member Wernick -
Present
CLOSED SESSION:
The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act
(Government Code Section §54960, et sue.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real
Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation;
and /or discussing matters covered under Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel); and /or
conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators; as follows:
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a)) — 2
matters.
Bressi v. City of El Segundo, LASC No. BC288292
Bressi v. City of El Segundo, LASC No. BC288293
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(b): -0- potential case (no
further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government
Code §54956.9(c): -1- matter.
DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) — None.
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54957.6) — 2 matters
1. Labor Negotiators: Bruce Barsook and Mary Strenn, City Manager
Bargaining Units: Police Officers' Association and Firefighters' Association
Conference with City's Labor Negotiator, City Manager, regarding Management/Confidential
employee group (unrepresented)
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8): -0- matter
SPECIAL MATTERS — None.
Council moved to open session at 6:55 p.m.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 15, 2003
PAGE NO 1
13S
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JULY 15, 2003 — 7:00 P.M.
7:00 P.M. SESSION
CALL TO ORDER — Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs at 7:00 p.m.
INVOCATION — Pastor Rich Reid of El Segundo Christian Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Council Member Kelly McDowell
PRESENTATIONS — NONE
ROLL CALL
Mayor Gordon -
Mayor ProTem Jacobs -
Council Member Gaines -
Council Member McDowell -
Council Member Wernick -
Present — Arrived at 7:50 p.m.
Present
Present
Present
Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City
Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify
themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of $250. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow
Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after
Public Communications is closed.
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda by title only.
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Wernick, to read
all ordinances and resolutions on the Agenda by Title only. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0 MAYOR GORDON ABSENT
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS — ITEM NO. 1 POSTPONED TO LATER IN THE
MEETING
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
2. Consideration and possible action regarding the approval of the Hyperion Monitoring
Agreement (HMA) between the City of El Segundo and the City of Los Angeles regarding
operation of the Hyperion Treatment Plant (HTP).
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 15, 2003
PAGE NO. Z Q
)
A. 0
Mary Strenn, City Manager, gave a report.
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Wernick to
approve the Hyperion Monitoring Agreement No. 3202 (HMA) between the City to El
Segundo and the City of Los Angeles regarding operation of the Hyperion Treatment Plant
(HTP) and authorized the Mayor to execute on behalf of the City. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. MAYOR GORDON ABSENT
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - NONE
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a
call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next
heading of business.
3. Approved Warrant Numbers 2534507 to 2534793 on Register No. 19 in the total amount of
$1,343,723.97 and Wire Transfers from 6/21/2003 through 7/3/2003 in the total amount of
$316,532.10. Authorized staff to release. Ratified Payroll and Employee Benefit checks;
checks released early due to contracts or agreement; emergency disbursements and /or
adjustments; and wire transfers.
4. Approved City Council Meeting Minutes of July 1, 2003 and Special Meeting Minutes of July
7, 2003.
5. PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCIL MEMBER WERNICK.
6. Accepted the work as complete for the Installation of an ADA Elevator at City Hall (350 Main
Street) — Approved Capital Improvement Program — Project No. PW 02 -18 — CDBG Project
No. 600069 -01 — (Contract Amount $224,655.37). Approved Change Order No. 1 in the
amount of $28,221.37. Authorized the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of
Completion in the County Recorder's Office.
7. Approved a $50,000 amendment to an existing Professional Services Agreement (Contract
No. 3178) for contract planning services for the Department of Community, Economic
Development Services with Willdan. Authorized the Mayor to execute the agreement.
8. CONTINUED TO FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA - Consideration and possible action to
waive the formal bidding process on the purchase of 15 Data 911 M5 Mobile Data
Computer systems (MDC) for the El Segundo Police Department. The total cost is
approximately $116,000 using grant funds.
MOVED by Council Member Gaines, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to approve
consent items 3, 4, 6 and 7. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. MAYOR
GORDON ABSENT. COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES ABSTAINING ON CONSENT ITEM 4.
CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 15, 2003
PAGE NO 3
1��iJ
5. Consideration and possible action regarding the acceptance of the FY 2003 -2004 Estimated
Revenue and Appropriation Assumptions.
MOVED by Council Member Wernick, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to accept
the FY 2003 -2004 Estimated Revenue and Appropriation Assumptions. MOTION PASSED
BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. MAYOR GORDON ABSENT
F. NEW BUSINESS — NONE
G. REPORTS — CITY MANAGER — NONE
H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY — NONE
REPORTS — CITY CLERK — NONE
J. REPORTS — CITY TREASURER — NONE
K. REPORTS — CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member McDowell — Reported on recent ICMA meeting and State recall effort.
Council Member Gaines — Spoke regarding the 4th of July celebrations and the honoring of the
returning veterans.
Council Member Wernick — Congratulated staff on outstanding 4th of July celebration. Reported on
recent Airport meeting, State budget and Strategic Planning Meeting.
Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs — Reported on upcoming League of California Cities and State budget.
Also spoke on South Bay COG, community and School District partnerships.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have receive value of $50 or more to communicate to the City
Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify
themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and
punishable by a fine of $250. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow
Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after
Public Communications is closed.
Joe Brandin, resident, spoke regarding campaign expenditure filings and fund raising.
Alan West, resident, spoke in favor of the downtown revitalization.
Juli Potter, resident, spoke regarding the downtown revitalization. Asked who is responsible for
liability on sidewalks and tables.
Council recessed at 7:29 p.m.
Council reconvened at 7:50 p.m.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 15, 2003
PAGE NO. 4
.L 1
ROLL CALL
Mayor Gordon -
Present
Mayor ProTem Jacobs -
Present
Council Member Gaines -
Present
Council Member McDowell-
Present
Council Member Wernick -
Present
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS
Public hearing for consideration and possible certification of an Environmental Impact
Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS /EIR) for the Los Angeles Air Force Base
(LAAFB) Land Conveyance, Construction, and Development Project. (Environmental
Assessment No. 577) and consideration of LAFCO Application and Reorganization
Agreement.
Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a public hearing to consider
certification of an Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS /EIR)
for the Los Angeles Air Force Base (LAAFB) Land Conveyance, Construction, and
Development Project (Environmental Assessment No. 577) and consideration of LAFCO
Application and Reorganization Agreement.
He asked if proper notice of the hearing was done in a timely manner and if any written
correspondence had been received. Clerk Mortesen stated that proper notice was
completed and three written communications had been received by the City Clerk's Office.
Jim Hansen, Director of Community, Economic and Development Services gave a report.
The SAMS Venture, LLC and the Air Force gave a presentation.
Mark Hensley, City Attorney, gave an explanation of the LAFCO Resolution, the
reorganization process and the Reorganization Agreement.
He also read the following changes into the record:
Resolution No. 4315: A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REQ ESTiNG AUTHORIZING THE LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION COMMISSION TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE REORGANIZATION
OF TERRITORY.
Resolution No. 4315: Page 3, paragraph 7, add authorized and requested to last line.
Reorganization Agreement No. 3203:
Page 3, L 1. add Hawthorne Resolution No. 03 -6817 and El Segundo Resolution No. 4314.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 15, 2003
PAGE Nq 5
L��
Page 6, b. should read "If the Developer -USAF Agreement is not fully executed by April
15, 2004, or is fully executed by such date but is subsequently terminated..."
Page 6, (i) should read "Hawthorne and the Agency actually receive..."
Exhibit C, page 1, title should read "A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE REQUEST-1 "'r' AUTHORIZING THE LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY"
Exhibit C, page 3, paragraph 4, line 3 should read "Quality Act, the City Council of El
Segundo, acting as the Lead Agency, has certified an environmental impact report..."
Exhibit C, page 3 after paragraph 4, add the following paragraph:
WHEREAS The City Council of Hawthorne, acting as a responsible agency, reviewed
and considered the EIR prepared and certified by El Segundo, exercised its own
independent judgment thereo, adopted the findings set forth in City of Hawthorne
Resolution No. 6817, (attached as Exhibit C'q.
Exhibit C, page 3, paragraph 5, line 2 should read "attached hereto as Exhibit "D';
"Hawthorne and El Segundo entered into such agreement."
Exhibit C, page 4, line land 2 should read "as Exhibit "D" on or before July 19, 2003, and
El Segundo has adopted a resolution in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "E" on or
before July 19, 2003;
Exhibit D, page 1, title should read "A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REQUEST! AUTHORIZING THE LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY"
Joe Brandin, resident, spoke regarding the LAFCO process and the possibility of non-
residential development.
Lilly Craig, resident, and on behalf of Chevron, spoke in support of the project.
Polly Branch, Residence Inn and Marriott Hotels, spoke in support of the project.
Chad Cerrito, resident and Manager of Marriott Hotels, spoke in support of the project.
George Wiley, former El Segundo resident, spoke in support of the project.
Dan Ehler, Executive Director of the El Segundo Chamber of Commerce, spoke in support
of the project.
Alan West, resident, spoke in support of the project.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 15, 2003
PAGE NO. q
14
Steven Rutleg, Hawthorne resident, spoke against the project and proposed density.
Jan Cruickshank, resident, spoke regarding the project and lack of circulation element
study.
Juli Potter, resident, spoke against the project.
Kyle Orlamond, Holly Glen resident, spoke in support of keeping the Air Force Base in El
Segundo but did not support the current proposal.
Mike Wysake, Holly Glen resident, spoke in support of the project.
Richard Arabian, resident, spoke in support of keeping the Air Force Base in the South Bay
but did not support the current proposal.
Tom King, Holly Glen resident, spoke against the project.
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Gaines to close
the public hearing. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
Mark Hensley, City Attorney, read by title only:
RESOLUTION NO. 4314
A RESOLUTION OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TO CERTIFY
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
SCH NO. 2002071106, AND TO ADOPT FINDINGS, STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND MITIGATION MONITORING REPORT
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Gaines to adopt
Resolution No. 4314 Certifying Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact
Report SCH No. 2002071106, and to adopt Findings, Statement of Overriding
Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring Report pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act. MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOICE VOTE: AYES: MAYOR
GORDON, MAYOR PRO TEM JACOBS, COUNCIL MEMBERS MCDOWELL AND
GAINES; NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER WERNICK. 4/1
Mark Hensley, City Attorney, read by title only:
RESOLUTION NO. 4315
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL
SEGUNDO REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO
INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 15, 2003
PAGE NO 7
t
1 -i[
MOVED by Council Member Gaines, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to adopt
Resolution No. 4315 requesting the Local Agency Formation Commission to initiate
proceedings for the Reorganization of Territory. MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING
VOICE VOTE: AYES: MAYOR GORDON, MAYOR PRO TEM JACOBS, COUNCIL
MEMBERS MCDOWELL AND GAINES; NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER WERNICK. 4/1
Council gave direction to staff that if LAFCO did not approve the contingency clauses, the
Resolution would come back to Council for amendment.
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Gaines to approve
Reorganization Agreement No. 3203 with the City of Hawthorne, the Hawthorne
Redevelopment Agency and SAMS Venture LLC. MOTION PASSED BY THE
FOLLOWING VOICE VOTE: AYES: MAYOR GORDON, MAYOR PRO TEM JACOBS,
COUNCIL MEMBERS MCDOWELL AND GAINES; NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER
WERNICK. 4/1
MEMORIALS — In memory of Walcott Ames, grandfather of Becki Ames, Chief of Staff for
Assemblyman George Nakano and Susan Quinn, resident and City employee.
CELEBRATIONS — Announce the birth of Adian Joseph Curran, son of Gavin Curran, Assistant
Finance Director, and his wife Anna and Melanie Tran, daughter of Billy and Ana Tran, owners of
Queen Nails.
CLOSED SESSION - NONE
ADJOURNMENT at 10:00 p.m.
Cathy Domann
Deputy City Clerk
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 15, 2003
PAGE �O
14 5
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding approval of a $1,000,000 grant from the FAA to
be used for the Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Authorize the Mayor to execute the FAA Grant Agreement for Project No. AIP 3- 06 -0139-
25; 2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
Earlier this year, staff applied for additional FAA Grant Funding for the City's RSI Program. On
July 30, the FAA sent a grant agreement for $1,000,000 in additional funding contingent on the
offer being accepted by the City on or before August 29, 2003. The offer is in keeping with
previous terms and conditions of previous FAA grants accepted by the City. To date, the City
has accepted seven FAA grants totaling $8,808,880. Currently, 49 dwellings are receiving RSI
improvements. It is anticipated that work on those homes will be completed by mid -
September. The next phase of construction is slated to begin in early 2004.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Project No. AIP 3 -06- 0139 -25 Grant Offer
FISCAL IMPACT: $1,000,000 to be received in RSI Grant Funds
Operating Budget:
Amount Requested:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required: _Yes X No
ORIGINATED: DATE: August b,
.., (,I*
es O'Neill, Program Coordinator
REVIEWED BY- DATE:
Mary nn, City Manager �
X46,
5
r --I
PJ
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
GRANT AGREEMENT
Part I - Offer
Date of Offer July 30, 2003
Los Angeles International Airport /Planning Area
Project No 3 -06- 0139 -25
Contract No DTFA08 -03 -C -21527
TO: City of El Segundo
(herein called the "Sponsor ")
FROM: The United States of America (acting through the Federal Aviation Administration,
herein called the "FAA ")
WHEREAS, the Sponsor has submitted to the FAA Project Application dated June 19, 2003 for a grant of Federal funds
for a project at or associated with the Los Angeles International Airport/Planning Area which Project Application, as
approved by the FAA, is hereby incorporated herein and made part hereof; and
WHEREAS, the FAA has approved a project for the Airport or Planning Area (herein called the "Project') consisting of the
following:
Noise mitigation measures for residences within 75 DNL in the city of El Segundo
(approximately 33 units)
all as more particularly described in the Project Application.
Page 1 of 4 Pages .1 i
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to and for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of Title 49, United States Code, as
amended, herein called the "Act," and in consideration of (a) the Sponsor's adoption and ratification of the representations
and assurances contained in said Project Application and its acceptance of this Offer as hereinafter provided, and (b) the
benefits to accrue to the United States and the public from the accomplishment of the Project and compliance with the
assurances and conditions as herein provided, THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, FOR AND ON BEHALF
OF THE UNITED STATES, HEREBY OFFERS AND AGREES to pay, as the United States share of the allowable costs
incurred in accomplishing the Project, 80 percent of those eligible project costs.
The Offer is made on and subject to the following terms and conditions:
Conditions
The maximum obligation of the United States payable under this offer shall be $1,000,000.00
For the purposes of any future grant amendments which may increase the foregoing maximum obligation of the
United States under the provisions of Section 47108(b) of the Act, the following amounts are being specified for this
purpose:
$ 000 for planning
$ 1,000,000.00 for airport development or noise program implementation.
2 The allowable costs of the project shall not include any costs determined by the FAA to be ineligible for consideration
as to allowability under the Act
3. Payment of the United States share of the allowable project costs will be made pursuant to and in accordance with
the provisions of such regulations and procedures as the Secretary shall prescribe. Final determination of the United
States share will be based upon the final audit of the total amount of allowable project costs and settlement will be
made for any upward or downward adjustments to the Federal share of costs.
4. The Sponsor shall carry out and complete the Project without undue delays and in accordance with the terms hereof,
and such regulations and procedures as the Secretary shall prescribe, and agrees to comply with the assurances
which were made part of the project application
5. The FAA reserves the right to amend or withdraw this offer at any time prior to its acceptance by the sponsor.
6 This offer shall expire and the United States shall not be obligated to pay any part of the costs of the project unless
this offer has been accepted by the sponsor on or before August 29, 2003 or such subsequent date as may be
prescribed in writing by the FAA
7 The Sponsor shall take all steps, including litigation if necessary, to recover Federal funds spent fraudulently,
wastefully, or in violation of Federal antitrust statutes, or misused in any other manner in any project upon which
Federal funds have been expended For the purposes of this grant agreement, the term "Federal funds" means funds
however used or disbursed by the Sponsor that were originally paid pursuant to this or any other Federal grant
agreement. It shall obtain the approval of the Secretary as to any determination of the amount of the Federal share
of such funds. It shall return the recovered Federal share, including funds recovered by settlement, order or
judgment, to the Secretary It shall furnish to the Secretary, upon request, all documents and records pertaining to
the determination of the amount of the Federal share or to any settlement, litigation, negotiation, or other efforts taken
to recover such funds. All settlements or other final positions of the Sponsor, in court or otherwise, involving the
recovery of such Federal share shall be approved in advance by the Secretary
8. The United States shall not be responsible or liable for damage to property or injury to persons which may arise from,
or be incident to, compliance with this grant agreement.
9 Buy American Requirement Unless otherwise approved by the FAA, it will not acquire or permit any contractor or
subcontractor to acquire any steel or manufactured products produced outside the United States, to be used for any
project for airport development or noise compatibility for which funds are provided under this grant. The sponsor will
include in every contract a provision implementing this special condition.
Page 2 of 4 Pages ��
10. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that this Grant Offer is made and accepted based on
estimates for the described airport development or noise program implementation; and the parties hereby covenant
and agree that within 210 days from the date of acceptance of this Grant Offer, the Sponsor shall receive bids for the
approved project contained within the grant description.
11. No payment shall be made under the terms of this grant agreement for work accomplished on privately owned land
until the sponsor submits the agreement with the owner of the property required by Assurance 5d of the Part V
Assurances and such agreement is determined to be satisfactory. As a minimum, the agreement with the private
owner must contain the following provisions:
11.1. The property owner shall subject the construction work on the project to such inspection and approval during
the construction or installation of the noise compatibility measures and after completion of the measures as
may reasonably be requested by the Secretary or the sponsor.
11.2 The property owner shall assume the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the items installed,
purchased or constructed under this grant agreement. Neither the FAA nor the sponsor bears any
responsibility for the maintenance and operation of these items.
11.3. If Federal funds for the noise compatibility measures are transferred by the sponsor to the owner of the private
property, or the owner's agent, the property owner shall agree to maintain and make available to the Secretary
or the sponsor, upon reasonable request, records disclosing the amount of funds received and the disposition
of those funds.
11 4 The property owner's right to sue the owner of Los Angeles International Airport for adverse noise impact will be
abrogated if the property owner deliberately or willfully acts to reduce or destroy the effectiveness of the noise
compatibility measures during the useful life of such measures This obligation shall remain in effect
throughout the useful life of the noise compatibility measures, but not to exceed twenty (20) years from the date
of the sponsor's acceptance of Federal aid for the project.
12. The Sponsor agrees to request cash drawdowns on the letter of credit only when actually needed for its
disbursements and to timely reporting of such disbursements as required. It is understood that failure to adhere to
this provision may cause the letter of credit to be revoked.
13. It is mutually understood and agreed that if, during the life of the project, the FAA determines that the maximum grant
obligation of the United States exceeds the expected needs of the Sponsor by $25,000.00 or five percent (5 %),
whichever is greater, the maximum obligation of the United States can be unilaterally reduced by letter from the FAA
advising of the budget change. Conversely, if there is an overrun in the total actual eligible and allowable project
costs, FAA may increase the maximum grant obligation of the United States to cover the amount of the overrun not to
exceed the statutory percent limitation and will advise the Sponsor by letter of the increase. It is further understood
and agreed that if, during the life of the project, the FAA determines that a change in the grant description is
advantageous and in the best interests of the United States, the change in grant description will be unilaterally
amended by letter from the FAA. Upon issuance of the aforementioned letter, either the grant obligation of the United
States is adjusted to the amount specified or the grant description is amended to the description specified.
14 The attached Assurances is incorporated hereto with the Grant Offer and is made a part hereof.
Page 3 of 4 Pages i ;_�
The Sponsor's acceptance of this Offer and ratification and adoption of the Project Application incorporated herein shall be
evidenced by execution of this instrument by the Sponsor, as hereinafter provided, and this Offer and Acceptance shall
comprise a Grant Agreement, as provided by the Act, constituting the contractual obligations and rights of the United
States and the Sponsor with respect to the accomplishment of the Project and compliance with the assurances and
conditions as provided herein. Such Grant Agreement shall become effective upon the Sponsor's acceptance of this
Offer.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
—121L,� QAn:��� -
Ruben C. Cabalbag
Supervisor, Standards Section
Part II - Acceptance
The Sponsor does hereby ratify and adopt all assurances, statements, representations, warranties, covenants, and
agreements contained In the Project Application and Incorporated materials referred to in the foregoing Offer and does
hereby accept this Offer and by such acceptance agrees to comply with all of the terms and conditions In this Offer and In
the Project Application
Executed this day of August, 2003.
Attest
Title
City of El Segundo
(Name of Sponsor)
(Signature of Sponsor's Designated Official Representative)
By:
(SEAL) (Typed Name of Sponsor's Designated Official Representative)
Title:
(Typed Title of Sponsor's Designated Official Representative)
CERTIFICATE OF SPONSOR'S ATTORNEY
acting as Attorney for the Sponsor do hereby certify:
That in my opinion the Sponsor is empowered to enter into the foregoing Grant Agreement under the laws of the State of
California Further, I have examined the foregoing Grant Agreement and the actions taken by said Sponsor and Sponsor's
official representative has been duly authorized and that the execution thereof is In all respects due and proper in
accordance with the laws of the said State and the Act. In addition, for grants Involving projects to be carried out on
property not owned by the Sponsor, there are no legal impediments that will prevent full performance by the Sponsor.
Further, it is my opinion that the said Grant Agreement constitutes a legal and binding obligation of the Sponsor in
accordance with the terms thereof.
Dated at this day of 2003.
(Signature of Sponsors Attorney)
Page 4 of 4 Pages 1-0
i Z
.
ASSURANCES
Non - Airport Sponsors Undertaking Noise Compatibility Program Projects
A. General.
1. These assurances shall be complied with in the performance of grant
agreements for noise compatibility projects undertaken by sponsors who are not
proprietors of the airport which is the subject of the noise compatibility program.
2. These assurances are required to be submitted as part of the project application
by sponsors requesting funds under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C., subtitle
VII, as amended. Sponsors are units of local government in the areas around
the airport which is the subject of the noise compatibility program.
3. Upon acceptance of the grant offer by the sponsor, these assurances are
incorporated in and become part of the grant agreement.
B. Duration. The terms, conditions, and assurances, of the grant agreement shall remain in
full force and effect throughout the useful life of the facilities developed or equipment
acquired or throughout the useful life of the items installed under the project, but in any
event not to exceed twenty (20) years from the date of the acceptance of a grant offer of
Federal funds for the project. However, there shall be no time limit on the duration of the
terms, conditions, and assurances with respect to real property acquired with Federal
funds. Furthermore, the duration of the Civil Rights assurance shall be as specified in the
assurance.
C. Sponsor Certification. The sponsor hereby assures and certifies, with respect to this
grant that:
General Federal Requirements. It will comply with all applicable Federal laws,
regulations, executive orders, policies, guidelines and requirements as they
relate to the application, acceptance, and use of Federal funds for this project
including but not limited to the following:
Federal Legislation.
a. Title 49, U.S.C., subtitle VII, as amended.
b. Davis -Bacon Act - 40 U.S.C. 276(a). et seq.
C. Federal Fair Labor Standards Act - 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.
d Hatch Act - 5 U_S.C. 1501, et seq.
e. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
Policies Act of 1970 - 42 U.S.C. 4601, et seq.
f. National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 - Section 106 - 16
U.S.C. 470(f).
g. Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 - 469
through 469c.
h. Native American Grave Repatriation Act - 25 U.S.C. Section
3001, et sea.
1. Clean Air Act, P.L. 90 -148, as amended.
j. Coastal Zone Management Act, P L 93 -205, as amended.
k. Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 - Section 102(a) -42
U.S.C. 4012a.
I_ Title 49, U.S.C., Section 303, (formerly known as Section 4(f)).
M. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 - 29 U.S.C. 794.
n. Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Title VI - 42 U.S.C. 2000d through d -4.
o. Age Discrimination Act of 1975 - 42 U.S.C. 6101, et seq.
Nonairport Sponsor Assurances
15i
p. American Indian Religious Freedom Act, P.L. 95 -341,
q Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 - U.S.C. 4151, et seq.
r. Power plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978 - Section 403 -
42 U S.C. 8373.
S. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act - 40 U.S.C. 327, et seq.
t. Copeland Antikickback Act -18 U.S.C. 874
u National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 - 42 U.S.C. 4321, et
seq.
V. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, P.L 90 -542, as amended.
W. Single Audit Act of 1984 - 31 U.S.C. 7501, et seq.
X. Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988 - 41 U.S.C. 702 through 706.
Executive Orders
Executive Order 11246 - Equal Employment Opportunity
Executive Order 11990 - Protection of Wetlands
Executive Order 11998 — Flood Plain Management
Executive Order 12372 - Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.
Executive Order 12699 - Seismic Safety of Federal and Federally
Assisted New Building Construction
Executive Order 12898 - Environmental Justice
Federal Regulations
a. 14 CFR Part 13 - Investigative and Enforcement Procedures.
b. 14 CFR Part 16 - Rules of Practice For Federally Assisted
Airport Enforcement Proceedings.
C. 14 CFR Part 150 - Airport noise compatibility planning.
d. 29 CFR Part 1 - Procedures for predetermination of wage rates.
e. 29 CFR Part 3 - Contractors and subcontractors on public
building or public work financed in whole or part by loans or
grants from the United States.
f 29 CFR Part 5 - Labor standards provisions applicable to
contracts covering federally financed and assisted construction.
g. 41 CFR Part 60 - Office of Federal contract compliance
programs, equal employment opportunity, Department of Labor
(Federal and federally- assisted contracting requirements).
h 49 CFR Part 18 - Uniform administrative requirements for grants
and cooperative agreements to state and local governments.
1. 49 CFR Part 20 - New restrictions on lobbying.
j. 49 CFR Part 21 - Nondiscrimination in federally- assisted
programs of the Department of Transportation - effectuation of
Title VI to the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
k. 49 CFR Part 24 - Uniform relocation assistance and real property
acquisition regulation for Federal and federally assisted
programs.
I. 49 CFR Part 26 — Participation By Disadvantaged
Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation
Programs.
M. 49 CFR Part 27 - Non - Discrimination on the basis of handicap in
programs and activities receiving or benefitting from Federal
financial assistance.
Nonairport Sponsor Assurances
iJ�?
n. 49 CFR Part 29 — Government wide debarment and suspension
(non- procurement) and government wide requirements for drug -
free workplace (grants).
o. 49 CFR Part 30 - Denial of public work contracts to suppliers of
goods and services of countries that deny procurement market
access to U.S. contractors.
P. 49 CFR Part 41 - Seismic safety of Federal and federally
assisted or regulated new building construction.
Office of Management and Budget Circulars
A -87 - Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with
State and Local Governments.
A -133 -Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non - Profit
Organizations.
Specific assurances required to be included in grant agreements by any of the
above laws, regulations or circulars are incorporated by reference in the grant
agreement.
2. Responsibility and Authority of the Sponsor. It has legal authority to apply for
the grant, and to finance and carry out the proposed project; that a resolution,
motion, or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the
applicant's governing body authorizing the filing of the application, including all
understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing
the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to act in
connection with the application and to provide such additional information as may
be required.
Sponsor Fund Availability.
a. It has sufficient funds available for that portion of the project
costs which are not to be paid by the United States.
b. It has sufficient funds available to ensure operation and
maintenance of items funded under the grant agreement which it
will own or control.
4. Good Title. For projects to be carried out on the property of the sponsor, it holds
good title satisfactory to the Secretary to that portion of the property upon which
Federal funds will be expended or will give assurance to the Secretary that good
title will be obtained.
5. Preserving Rights and Powers.
It will not enter into any transaction, or take or permit any action
which would operate to deprive it of any of the rights and powers
necessary to perform any or all of the terms, conditions, and
assurances in the grant agreement without the written approval
of the Secretary, and will act to acquire, extinguish, or modify
any outstanding rights or claims of right of others which would
interfere with such performance by the sponsor. This shall be
done in a manner acceptable to the Secretary
It will not sell, lease, encumber, or otherwise transfer or dispose
of any part of its title or other interests in the property, for which it
holds good title and upon which Federal funds have been
expended, for the duration of the terms, conditions, and
Nonairport Sponsor Assurances
1 � .i
assurances in the grant agreement, without approval by the
Secretary. If the transferee is found by the Secretary to be
eligible under Title 49, United States Code, to assume the
obligations of the grant agreement and to have the power,
authority, and financial resources to carry out all such
obligations, the sponsor shall insert in the contract or document
transferring or disposing of the sponsor's interest, and making
binding upon the transferee, all of the terms, conditions and
assurances contained in this grant agreement.
c For all noise compatibility projects which are to be carried out by
another unit of local government or are on property owned by a
unit of local government other than the sponsor, it will enter into
an agreement with that governmental unit. Except as otherwise
specified by the Secretary, that agreement shall obligate that
governmental unit to the same terms, conditions, and
assurances that would be applicable to it if it applied directly to
the FAA for a grant to undertake the noise compatibility project.
That agreement and changes thereto must be approved in
advance by the Secretary.
d. For noise compatibility projects to be carried out on privately
owned property, it will enter into an agreement with the owner of
that property which includes provisions specified by the
Secretary.
6. Consistency with Local Plans. The project is reasonably consistent with plans
(existing at the time of submission of this application) of public agencies that are
authorized by the State in which the project is located to plan for the
development of the area surrounding the airport.
7. Consideration of Local Interest. It has given fair consideration to the interest of
communities in or near which the project may be located.
8. Accounting System, Audit, and Record keeping Requirements.
It shall keep all project accounts and records which fully disclose
the amount and disposition by the recipient of the proceeds of
the grant, the total cost of the project in connection with which
the grant is given or used, and the amount or nature of that
portion of the cost of the project supplied by other sources, and
such other financial records pertinent to the project. The
accounts and records should be kept in accordance with an
accounting system that will facilitate an effective audit in
accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984.
It shall make available to the Secretary and the Comptroller
General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized
representatives, for the purpose of audit and examination, any
books, documents, papers, and records of the recipient that are
pertinent to the grant. The Secretary may require that an
appropriate audit be conducted by a recipient. In any case in
which an independent audit is made of the accounts of a sponsor
relating to the disposition of the proceeds of a grant or relating to
the project in connection with which the grant was given or used,
it shall file a certified copy of such audit with the Comptroller
General no later than six (6) months following the close of the
fiscal year for which the audit was conducted.
Nonairport Sponsor Assurances
Minimum Wage Rates. It shall include, in all contracts in excess of $2,000 for
work on any projects funded under the grant agreement which involve labor,
provisions establishing minimum rates of wages, to be predetermined by the
Secretary of Labor, in accordance with the Davis -Bacon Act, as amended (40
U.S.0 276a- 276a -5), which contractors shall pay to skilled and unskilled labor,
and such minimum rates shall be stated in the invitation for bids and shall be
included in proposals or bids for the work.
10. Veteran's Preference. It shall include, in all contracts for work on any project
funded under the grant agreement which involve labor, such provisions as are
necessary to insure that, in the employment of labor (except in administrative,
executive, and supervisory positions), preference shall be given to veterans of
the Vietnam era and disabled veterans as defined in Section 47117 of Title 49,
United States Code. However, this preference shall apply only where the
individuals are available and qualified to perform the work to which the
employment relates.
11. Conformity to Plans and Specifications. It will execute the project subject to
plans, specifications, and schedules approved by the Secretary Such plans,
specifications, and schedules shall be submitted to the Secretary prior to
commencement of site preparation, construction, or other performance under this
grant agreement, and, upon approval by the Secretary, shall be incorporated into
this grant agreement. Any modifications to the approved plans, specifications,
and schedules shall also be subject to approval by the Secretary and
incorporation into the grant agreement.
12. Construction Inspection and Approval. It will provide and maintain competent
technical supervision at the construction site throughout the project to assure that
the work conforms with the plans, specifications, and schedules approved by the
Secretary for the project. It shall subject the construction work on any project
contained in an approved project application to inspection and approval by the
Secretary and such work shall be in accordance with regulations and procedures
prescribed by the Secretary. Such regulations and procedures shall require such
cost and progress reporting by the sponsor or sponsors of such project as the
Secretary shall deem necessary.
13. Operation and Maintenance. It will suitably operate and maintain noise program
implementation items that it owns or controls upon which Federal funds have
been expended.
14. Hazard Prevention. It will protect such terminal airspace as is required to protect
instrument and visual operations to the airport (including established minimum
flight altitudes) by preventing the establishment or creation of future airport
hazards on property owned or controlled by it or over which it has land use
jurisdiction.
15. Compatible Land Use. It will take appropriate action, including the adoption of
zoning laws, to the extent reasonable, to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in
the immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with
normal airport operations, including landing and takeoff of aircraft. In addition, it
will not cause or permit any change in land use, within its jurisdiction that will
reduce the compatibility, with respect to the airport, of the noise compatibility
measures upon which Federal funds have been expended.
Nonairport Sponsor Assurances
1 � �l
16. Reports and Inspections. It will submit to the Secretary such annual or special
financial and operations reports as the Secretary may reasonably request. It will
also make records and documents relating to the project, and continued
compliance with the terms, conditions, and assurances of the grant agreement
including deeds, leases, agreements, regulations, and other instruments,
available for inspection by any duly authorized agent of the Secretary upon
reasonable request.
17. Civil Rights. It will comply with such rules as are promulgated, to ensure that no
person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, or
handicap, be excluded from participating in any activity conducted with or
benefiting from funds received from this grant. This assurance obligates the
sponsor for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to
the program, except where Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the
form of personal property or real property interest therein, or structures or
improvements thereon, in which case the assurance obligates the sponsor or any
transferee for the longer of the following periods: (a) the period during which the
property is used for a purpose for which Federal financial assistance is extended,
or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits or (b)
the period during which the sponsor retains ownership or possession of the
property.
18. Engineering and Design Services. It will award each contract or subcontract for
program management, construction management, planning studies, feasibility
studies, architectural services, preliminary engineering, design, surveying,
mapping, or related services with respect to the project in the same manner as a
contract for architectural and engineering services as negotiated under Title IX of
the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 or an equivalent
qualifications -based requirement prescribed for or by the sponsor.
19. Foreign Market Restrictions. It will not allow funds provided under this grant to
be used to fund any project which uses any product or service of a foreign
country during the period in which such foreign country is listed by the United
States Trade Representative as denying fair and equitable market opportunities
for products and suppliers of the United States in procurement and construction.
20. Disposal of Land.
a. For land purchased under a grant for airport noise compatibility
purposes, it will dispose of the land, when the land is no longer
needed for such purposes, at fair market value, at the earliest
practicable time. That portion of the proceeds of such
disposition which is proportionate to the United States' share of
acquisition of such land will, at the discretion of the Secretary, 1)
be paid to the Secretary for deposit in the Trust Fund, or 2) be
reinvested in an approved noise compatibility project as
prescribed by the Secretary.
b. Disposition of such land under (a) will be subject to the retention
or reservation of any interest or right therein necessary to ensure
that such land will only be used for purposes which are
compatible with noise levels associated with operation of the
airport.
21. Relocation and Real Property Acquisition. (1) It will be guided in acquiring real
property, to the greatest extent practicable under State law, by the land
Nonairport Sponsor Assurances
M
i J is j
acquisition policies in Subpart B of 49 CFR Part 24 and will pay or reimburse
property owners for necessary expenses as specified in Subpart B. (2) It will
provide a relocation assistance program offering the services described in
Subpart C and fair and reasonable relocation payments and assistance to
displaced persons as required in Subparts D and E of 49 CFR Part 24. (3) It will
make available within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement
comparable replacement dwellings to displaced persons in accordance with
Subpart E of 49 CFR Part 24.
22. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. The recipient shall not discriminate on
the basis of race, color, national ongin or sex in the award and performance of
any DOT - assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE program or the
requirements of 49 CFR Part 26. The recipient shall take all necessary and
reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure nondiscnmination in the award
and administration of DOT - assisted contracts. The recipient's DBE program, as
required by 49 CFR Part 26, and as approved by DOT, is incorporated by
reference in this agreement. Implementation of this program is a legal obligation
and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement.
Upon notification to the recipient of its failure to carry out its approved program,
the Department may impose sanctions as provided for under Part 26, and may, in
appropriate cases refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U S C. 1001 and /or
the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U S.C. 3801).
Nonairport Sponsor Assurances
.4 -,
1�1
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action authorizing the City Manager to send written notice to
the El Segundo Unified School District ( "District ") of the City's intention to deduct the cost
of the City employed crossing guards from the annual District contribution of $250,000.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Authorize the City Manager to send written notice to the El Segundo Unified School
District ( "District ") of the City's intent to deduct the cost of the City employed crossing
guards at a cost of $21,800 from the annual District contribution of $250,000, leaving a
balance due of $228,200.
2. Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
In FY 2001 -2002, the City and the El Segundo Unified School District entered into a four -
year funding agreement. This agreement called for an annual contribution by the City of
$250,000 to assist the District in offsetting operational costs.
For fiscal year 2003 -2004 staff is recommending a deduction of the operational cost of the City
employed school crossing guards at a cost of $21,800 from the annual contribution of
$250,000, leaving a balance due of $228,200.
Per Section 1 of the funding agreement, any change to the agreement must be made in
writing to the District 30 days prior to the payment due date of October 1. Therefore, staff
is requesting the City Council authorize the City Manager to send written notice to the
District of the City's intention to deduct the cost of the City employed crossing guards and
remit the balance of $228,200.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
None
FISCAL IMPACT: $250,000 is included in the FY 2003 -2004 Operating Budget with $21,800 in salaries and
benefits for the crossing guards and the balance of $228,200 in Non - Department.
Operating Budget:
Amount Requested:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required: _ Yes X No (The Appropriation is part of the 2003 -2004 Operating Budget
ORIG ATED BY: DATE:
B et . Plumlee, Director Administrative Services
RE ED AB DATE:
M S ity Manager 0/3/03
6
�i
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding a Resolution providing for salary and benefit
changes to Chapter 1 A2 (Management - Confidential Series) of the El Segundo Administrative
Code. Fiscal Impact: $351,053 for FY 2003/04 and FY 2004/05.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Adopt the attached Resolution.
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
Executive Management and Mid- Management/Confidential job classifications are reviewed
periodically by the City Council for possible salary and /or benefit adjustments. The last salary
adjustment received by this group of employees was 3.2 %, effective June 29, 2002. At
Council's direction, staff initiated the review process for July 1, 2003 salary and /or benefit
adjustments starting in June 2003.
Adoption of the attached Resolution providing for changes to Chapter 1A2 (Management -
Confidential Series) of the El Segundo Administrative Code would result in the following:
-continued-
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Resolution
Y Attachment A, Salary Tables
FISCAL IMPACT: $351,053 for FY 2003/04 and FY 2004/05
Operating Budget:
Amount Requested: $173,655
Account Number: 001 -400- 2901 -4115
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required: X Yes _ No
;;IGATED: DATE: August 1, 2003
Bret M. Plumlee, Director of Administrative Services
REVIEWED Y: DATE:
�-�/ 7
Mary enn, City Manager agenda403
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION (Continued):
CHANGES EFFECTIVE 6/28/03
A 3.0% salary increase, based on the April 2003 Consumer Price Index for "Los
Angeles- Riverside - Orange County ". This increase would apply to all members of
the Executive Management, Mid- Management/Confidential group, consisting of 32
employees in 28 job classifications, and would be effective with the payroll period
beginning June 28, 2003.
2. An increase of $100 per month in "Flexible Medical Benefits ", from $800 per month
to $900 per month, effective with the payroll period beginning June 28, 2003. This
increase will also apply to elected officials.
CHANGES EFFECTIVE 6127104
A salary increase with a floor of 2.0% and a ceiling of 4.0 %, based on the April 2004
Consumer Price Index for "Los Angeles- Riverside - Orange County ". This increase
would apply to all members of the Executive Management, Mid -
Management/Confidential Group and would be effective with the payroll period
beginning June 27, 2004.
2. Should the City's Miscellaneous Bargaining Units in future contract negotiations be
provided an enhanced PERS retirement formula, e.g., 2.5 % @55, 2.7 % @55 or 3.0%
@60, the Management/Confidential employee group would receive a salary
increase in that year which is reduced by 1% and would represent the cost of
increasing the City's employee rate from 7% to 8 %.
An increase of $100 per month in "Flexible Medical Benefits ", from $900 per month
to $1000 per month, effective with the payroll period beginning June 27, 2004. This
increase will also apply to elected officials.
FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact of these changes is $173,655 or 4.18 %, in fiscal year 2003/04. The
estimated additional cost of increasing the flexible medical benefit amount for current retirees
is $31,800.
The fiscal impact of these changes for fiscal year 2004/05 is approximately $177,398, or
4.14 %. The estimated additional cost of increasing the flexible medical amount for retirees is
$31,800.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR SALARY AND BENEFIT CHANGES TO
CHAPTER 1A2 (MANAGEMENT - CONFIDENTIAL SERIES) OF THE EL
SEGUNDO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 1A2.010 of the Administrative Code, entitled "Basic Salary Schedule," as
listed in the attached "Attachment A," is amended as follows:
A. Effective with the payroll period beginning June 27, 2004, the "Basic Salary
Schedule" will be amended to reflect a salary increase with a minimum of 2.0% and a
maximum of 4.0 %, based on the April 2004 Consumer Price Index for "Los Angeles
— Riverside — Orange County" ( "CPI ").
B. Should the City's miscellaneous bargaining units in future contract negotiations be
provided an enhanced Public Employee Retirement System ( "PERS ") retirement
formula, e.g., 2.5 @55 %;, 2.7 % @55; or 3.0 % @60, the management/confidential
employee group would receive a reduced salary increase in that year. A reduction
would be equal to I% less of the CPI increase otherwise applicable to the Basic
Salary Schedule.
SECTION 2: Section 1A2.105 of the Administrative Code, entitled "Flexible Benefit Plan," is
amended to read as follows:
"1 . Effective with the payroll deduction for the month of July 2003, the monthly
contribution by the City will increase by $100 per month to $900 per month. These
benefits will be used principally for the purchase of employee medical insurance. All
other terms and conditions in Section 1 A2.105 (A) remain in effect.
2. Effective with the payroll deduction for the month of July 2004, the monthly
contribution by the City will increase by $100 per month to $1000 per month. These
benefits will be used principally for the purchase of employee medical insurance. All
other terms and conditions in Section 1A2.105 (A) remain in effect."
SECTION 3: The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; enter the
same in the book of original resolutions of said City; and will make a minute of the passage and
adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of
the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted.
SECTION 4: This resolution will remain effective until superseded by a subsequent resolution.
161
SECTION 5: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this — day of , 2003.
ATTTEST:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
APPRC
Mark E
R-M
Mike Gordon, Mayor
. ERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the
whole number of members of the City Council of the said City is five; that the foregoing resolution,
being RESOLUTION NO. was duly passed and adopted by the said City Council, approved and
signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of
the said Council held on the day of , 2003, and the same was so passed and
adopted by the following vote:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTION:
NOT PARTICIPATING:
WITNESS MY HAND THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF SAID CITY this day of
2003.
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
Of the City of El Segundo,
California
(SEAL)
162
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PROPOSED SALARY TABLES
MANAGEMENT /CONFIDENTIAL GROUP
EFFECTIVE PAYROLL BEGINNING JUNE 28, 2003
GRADE
STEP A
STEP B
STEP C
STEP D
STEP E
1 m
1,764.25
1,853.56
1,947.40
2,045.99
2,149.57
2m
1,808.36
1,899.90
1,996.09
2,097.14
2,203.31
3m
1,853.56
1,947.40
2,045.99
2,149.57
2,258.39
4m
1,899.90
1,996.09
2,097.14
2,203.31
2,314.85
5m
1,947.40
2,045.99
2,149.57
2,258.39
2,372.72
6m
1,996.09
2,097.14
2,203.31
2,314.85
2,432.04
7m
2,045.99
2,149.57
2,258.39
2,372.72
2,492.84
8m
2,097.14
2,203.31
2,314.85
2,432.04
2,555.16
9m
2,149.57
2,258.39
2,372.72
2,492.84
2,619.04
10m
2,203.31
2,314.85
2,432.04
2,555.16
2,684.51
11 m
2,258.39
2,372.72
2,492.84
2,619.04
2,751.63
12m
2,314.85
2,432.04
2,555.16
2,684.51
2,820.42
13m
2,372.72
2,492.84
2,619.04
2,751.63
2,890.93
14m
2,432.04
2,555.16
2,684.51
2,820.42
2,963.20
15m
2,492.84
2,619.04
2,751.63
2,890.93
3,037.28
16m
2,555.16
2,684.51
2,820.42
2,963.20
3,113.21
17m
2,619.04
2,751.63
2,890.93
3,037.28
3,191.04
18m
2,684.51
2,820.42
2,963.20
3,113.21
3,270.82
19m
2,751.63
2,890.93
3,037.28
3,191.04
3,352.59
20m
2,820.42
2,963.20
3,113.21
3,270.82
3,436.41
21m
2,890.93
3,037.28
3,191.04
3,352.59
3,522.32
22m
2,963.20
3,113.21
3,270.82
3,436.41
3,610.37
23m
3,037.28
3,191.04
3,352.59
3,522.32
3,700.63
24m
3,113.21
3,270.82
3,436.41
3,610.37
3,793.15
25m
3,191.04
3,352.59
3,522.32
3,700.63
3,887.98
26m
3,270.82
3,436.41
3,610.37
3,793.15
3,985.18
27m
3,352.59
3,522.32
3,700.63
3,887.98
4,084.81
28m
3,436.41
3,610.37
3,793.15
3,985.18
4,186.93
29m
3,522.32
3,700.63
3,887.98
4,084.81
4,291.60
30m
3,610.37
3,793.15
3,985.18
4,186.93
4,398.89
31 m
3,700.63
3,887.98
4,084.81
4,291.60
4,508.86
32m
3,793.15
3,985.18
4,186.93
4,398.89
4,621.58
33m
3,887.98
4,084.81
4,291.60
4,508.86
4,737.12
34m
3,985.18
4,186.93
4,398.89
4,621.58
4,855.55
35m
4,084.81
4,291.60
4,508.86
4,737.12
4,976.94
36m
4,186.93
4,398.89
4,621.58
4,855.55
5,101.36
37m
4,291.60
4,508.86
4,737.12
4,976.94
5,228.90
38m
4,398.89
4,621.58
4,855.55
5,101.36
5,359.62
39m
4,508.86
4,737.12
4,976.94
5,228.90
5,493.61
40m
4,621.58
4,855.55
5,101.36
5,359.62
5,630.95
41 m
4,737.12
4,976.94
5,228.90
5,493.61
5,771.72
42m
4,855.55
5,101.36
5,359.62
5,630.95
5,916.02
43m
4,976.94
5,228.90
5,493.61
5,771.72
6,063.92
44m
5,101.36
5,359.62
5,630.95
5,916.02
6,215.52
45m
5,228.90
5,493.61
5,771.72
6,063.92
6,370.90
46m
5,359.62
5,630.95
5,916.02
6,215.52
6,530.18 Y 6 J
47m
5,493.61
5,771.72
6,063.92
6,370.90
6,693.43
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PROPOSED SALARY TABLES
MANAGEMENT /CONFIDENTIAL GROUP
EFFECTIVE PAYROLL BEGINNING JUNE 28, 2003
GRADE
STEP A
STEP B
STEP C
STEP D
STEP E
48m
5,630.95
5,916.02
6,215.52
6,530.18
6,860.77
49m
5,771.72
6,063.92
6,370.90
6,693.43
7,032.29
50m
5,916.02
6,215.52
6,530.18
6,860.77
7,208.09
51 m
6,063.92
6,370.90
6,693.43
7,032.29
7,388.30
52m
6,215.52
6,530.18
6,860.77
7,208.09
7,573.00
53m
6,370.90
6,693.43
7,032.29
7,388.30
7,762.33
54m
6,530.18
6,860.77
7,208.09
7,573.00
7,956.39
55m
6,693.43
7,032.29
7,388.30
7,762.33
8,155.30
56m
6,860.77
7,208.09
7,573.00
7,956.39
8,359.18
57m
7,032.29
7,388.30
7,762.33
8,155.30
8,568.16
58m
7,208.09
7,573.00
7,956.39
8,359.18
8,782.36
59m
7,388.30
7,762.33
8,155.30
8,568.16
9,001.92
60m
7,573.00
7,956.39
8,359.18
8,782.36
9,226.97
61m
7,762.33
8,155.30
8,568.16
9,001.92
9,457.64
62m
7,956.39
8,359.18
8,782.36
9,226.97
9,694.08
63m
8,155.30
8,568.16
9,001.92
9,457.64
9,936.44
64m
8,359.18
8,782.36
9,226.97
9,694.08
10,184.85
65m
8,568.16
9,001.92
9,457.64
9,936.44
10,439.47
66m
8,782.36
9,226.97
9,694.08
10,184.85
10,700.45
67m
9,001.92
9,457.64
9,936.44
10,439.47
10,967.97
68m
9,226.97
9,694.08
10,184.85
10,700.45
11,242.16
69m
9,457.64
9,936.44
10,439.47
10,967.97
11,523.22
70m
9,694.08
10,184.85
10,700.45
11,242.16
11,811.30
71m
9,936.44
10,439.47
10,967.97
11,523.22
12,106.58
72m
10,184.85
10,700.45
11,242.16
11,811.30
12,409.25
73m
10,439.47
10,967.97
11,523.22
12,106.58
12,719.48
74m
10,700.45
11,242.16
11,811.30
12,409.25
13,037.46
75m
10,967.97
11,523.22
12,106.58
12,719.48
13,363.40
76m
11,242.16
11,811.30
12,409.25
13,037.46
13,697.49
77m
11,523.22
12,106.58
12,719.48
13,363.40
14,039.92
78m
11,811.30
12,409.25
13,037.46
13,697.49
14,390.92
79m
12,106.58
12,719.48
13,363.40
14,039.92
14,750.69
80m
12,409.25
13,037.46
13,697.49
14,390.92
15,119.46
60f
7,573.00
7,956.39
8,359.18
8,782.36
9,226.97
62f
7,956.39
8,359.18
8,782.36
9,226.97
9,694.08
69f
9,457.64
9,936.44
10,439.47
10,967.97
11,523.22
70p
9,694.08
10,184.85
10,700.45
11,242.16
11,811.30
70p -m
10,178.79
10,694.09
11,235.48
11,804.27
12,401.86
81 sec
4,755.60
4,996.36
5,249.30
5,515.04
5,794.24
1V °�
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action to accept the installation of electrical street lighting
conduits at the Nash Street / Park Place intersection - Approved Capital Improvement
Program - (final cost = $7,614).
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Recommendation — (1) Accept the work as complete; (2) Authorize the City Clerk to file
the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's Office; (3) Alternatively
discuss and take other action related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
On May 6, 2003 the City Council awarded a contract to Steiny and Company for installation
of underground electrical street lighting conduits at the Nash Street / Park Place
intersection. This work has now been completed and Southern California Edison Company
will install the lighting system which consists of three (3) street lights at the intersection.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Notice of Completion.
2. Location map.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Capital Improvement Program: $40,000
Amount Requested: $ 7,614
Account Number: 106 - 400 - 8203 -8605
Project Phase: Acceptance of work
Appropriation Required: No
ORIGINATED BY: DATE: August 11, 2003
Q�
Andres Santamaria, Director of Public Works
REVIEWED BY: DATE: LL
Ma AStre AyManager
8
20030819 — Accept Installation of Electrical Street Lighting Conduits at Nash Street and Park Place — PW 03 -10 ...-
�65
Recording Requested by
and When Recorded Mail To:
City Clerk, City Hall
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
Project Name: Installation of Electrical Street Lighting Conduits at the Nash Street and Park Place Intersection
Project No.: PW 03 -10
Notice is hereby given pursuant to State of California Civil Code Section 3093 et seq that-
Dated:
1. The undersigned is an officer of the owner of the interest stated below in the property
hereinafter described
2. The full name of the owner is: City of El Segundo
3. The full address of the owner is: City Hall, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA, 90245
4. The nature of the interest of the owner is: Street lights
5. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was field reviewed by the
City Engineer on August 1, 2003. The work done was- Installation of electrical conduits
for street lights at Nash Street / Park Place intersection.
6 On August 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of El Segundo accepted the work of this
contract as being complete and directed the recording of this Notice of Completion in the
Office of the County Recorder.
The name of the Contractor for such work of improvement was: Steiny and Company
The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of El
Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows:
Nash Street and Park Place
The street address of said property is: Not applicable
Bellur K. Devaraj
City Engineer
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, say. I am the City Engineer of the City El Segundo, the declarant of the foregoing
Notice of Completion; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; the same is
true of my own knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on , 2003 at El Segundo, California.
Bellur K. Devaraj
City Engineer
Miscellaneous \Notice of Completion — Accept Installation of Electmal Street
Lighting Conduds at the Nash Street and Park Place Intersection - PW 03 -10
In
ti
N I
O I A1N(100 S313ONV SO-1 AMi 3Na0H1A%VH d0 A110
F2 1 CA-IS 0031p NvS z
Q 1 Va3N3)]
W
u u ! w J
Q ti J f ` T
N N N � 6 N w N• N d y'
$ 9 9 9 9 9
jO
` lull LI �L� � Jm ~ ` i J ^ p•
aAlf NOIlVIAV
e 7 t 1 v A m �` epun* 4113 1s03
H 'O AAM M ' 13NYON - LIMOOK003H a: < — v
TtlO]
a` < Q i �• 31VAWd) AM
< a � � � aY A3,f10 � � 1V1M3NLLNW
�Z l0 = 3NIl H MO i
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
Consideration and possible action to authorize staff to solicit proposals from qualified
consulting engineering firms to provide construction management services for the Douglas
Street Gap Closure / Railroad Grade Separation Project - Approved Capital Improvement
Program - (estimated cost = $500,000).
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Recommendation — (1) Authorize staff to solicit proposals; (2) Alternatively discuss and
take other action related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
(Background & discussion begins on the next page.......)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
None.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Capital Improvement Program:
Amount Requested:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required:
$1,497,392
$ 500,000
301 - 400 - 8203 -8949
Construction
No
ORIGINATED „ DATE: August 11, 2003
Andres Santamaria, Director of Public Works
RE AED DATE:
Ma nn, City Manager °3
20030819 — Solicit Proposals for Construction Management Services for Douglas Street Project
ills
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
The design of the Douglas Street Project is complete and right -of -way negotiations and
certification is in progress by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. It is
anticipated that the right -of -way certification will be completed by February 2004 and the
project advertised for bidding after the certification has been approved by Caltrans as
required by the project's federal funding requirements. Construction is anticipated to
commence in June 2004.
The construction of this complex project involves several construction disciplines and
coordination with several utility companies, the MTA, S C Edison Company, BNSF Railroad
and several property owners adjacent to the project site. Caltrans has also required that a
resident engineer be on site who has to be a state licensed civil engineer.
Staff is requesting City Council approval to solicit proposals from professional construction
management firms that have experience in managing railroad grade separation projects of
a similar scope and magnitude. Material testing for steel, concrete and compaction will be
included in the scope of the required services. Consultant's services will commence after
the construction contract has been awarded.
20030819 — Solicit Proposals for Construction Management Services for Douglas Street Protect {-�
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action to waive the formal bidding process on the purchase of 15
Data 911 M5 Mobile Data Computer systems (MDC) for the El Segundo Police Department.
Fiscal impact is approximately $116,000 using grant funds.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
(1) Approve the purchase of 15 Data 911 MDC systems and equipment using funds from the
Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) grant and California Law Enforcement
Equipment Program (CLEEP) grant account.
(2) Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
The police department patrol division vehicles currently are equipped with the Datalux Mobile
Data Computer systems. The department utilizes MDC systems in each patrol unit as a tool for
sending and receiving information to and from the communications center, as well as other
informational databases including the DMV, CLETS, NCIC, and WPS.
Computer systems often become outdated within a few years. The current systems were
purchased in 1999. They consist of a 233 MHz Pentium MMX PC with 32 MB of RAM memory
and a 2 GB hard drive. This system is no longer useful because of the following reasons:
It requires constant service and must be sent to Virginia for repair.
Current specifications will not be useable with the proposed Automated Vehicle Locator
(AVL) upgrade. Minimum 500 MHz PC is needed with the AVL system.
Screen is not viewable in direct sunlight.
Continued...
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
None
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget: $100,000 (COPS grant) / $75,000 (CLEEP grant)
Amount Requested: $116,000 ($93,000 from COPS grant / $23,000 from CLEEP grant)
Account Number: 120 - 400 - 000 -8104 (COPS), 001 - 400 - 3101 -8104 (CLEEP)
Project Phase: N/A
Appropriation Required: x Yes No
ORIGI ED BY: DATE: August 12, 2003
Jack Wayt, Chi o olice
REVIEWED BY: DATE:
Mary St n, City Manager
10
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION CONTINUED:
Police department staff conducted research and looked at several MDC systems. Some of the
systems were immediately eliminated because they didn't fit our needs. Staff later focused on
two computer systems that seemed to meet our criteria. These systems are manufactured by
Data 911 and Motorola. In order to further evaluate them, they were installed in our patrol
vehicles. Some of the criteria used in evaluating the systems were:
1. Minimum operating technical specifications, i.e. minimum 500 MHz PC, increased
RAM, and hard drive space.
2. Compatibility to upgraded Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and AVL systems.
3. Ergonomics.
4. Sunlight viewable screen.
5. Reliability.
6. Service record.
7. Options.
The Motorola system was installed by Advanced Electronics and was evaluated for eight days.
The system met our technical specification requirements and had the options needed for our
application, but experienced numerous problems from the start. First, the screen failed and
had to be replaced. Our computer technician then had problems installing the software; this
was attributed to compatibility with our CAD. Officers reported the following problems with the
Motorola system:
1. The keyboard installation was too high, causing some officers to hit their elbows on
other equipment.
2. System constantly locked up with normal vehicle functions, i.e. starting the vehicle,
driving, and during standard operation of the computer.
3. It was not easy to use and the screen was not bright enough to be viewed during
intense sunlight.
4. There are numerous external function buttons, which were cumbersome because of the
location (located on the right side of the screen) and difficult to use because of the
different steps needed to access them. These officers stated this would be an officer
safety issue if the screen needed to be dimmed immediately.
5. The system did not meet any of the airbag compliance recommendations.
The Data 911 system was installed by Computer Deductions Inc. and was evaluated for ten
days. This system met all the technical specification requirements and had the options
needed for our application. The installation of our CAD system was seamless and instantly
worked without any problems. Officers were able to immediately use the system. The
installation met our standards for ergonomics and met most of the airbag compliance
recommendations. Officers reported that it was easy to use and that the screen was bright
enough to be viewed during intense sunlight. The proposed system is manufactured and sold
solely by Data 911 therefore the bidding process can be waived and conducted on a sole
source basis.
KGROUND & DISCUSSION CONTINUED:
Funds for the purchase of these computers would be made with COPS grant and CLEEP
grant funds.
The COPS grant was established during the 1996 California legislative session when the state
government adopted legislation to provide a block grant for law enforcement purposes. These
funds are part of the property taxes collected in California. All funds received under this grant
must be utilized to supplement local law enforcement activities and cannot be used to supplant
existing funding. The grant guidelines state the funds may be used for "front line law
enforcement," including hiring officers, buying equipment or computers, or paying for anti -
crime programs. The purchase of these computers using COPS funds would fall within grant
guidelines.
The main provision of the California Law Enforcement Equipment Program grant indicates that
funds shall be used for purchase of high - technology equipment. This equipment falls within
that provision. This purchase has been reviewed and approved by the city technology
committee.
COSTS
Fifteen (15) Data 911 M5 Mobile Data Computer Systems @ $6083.45 ea, totaling $91,251.75
plus related equipment, installation, and warranty for a grand total of $114,701.08.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the police department purchase the MDC's from Data 911 using COPS
grant funds and newly appropriated CLEEP grant funds.
1 ��
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action to waive the formal bidding process on the purchase of 13
Automatic Vehicle Locator (AVL) status - mapping systems, RADCOM client licenses,
antennas, and related equipment, for the police department patrol division. Fiscal impact is
approximately $19,604 in grant funds.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
(1) Approve the purchase of the AVL status mapping systems and RADCOM client licenses
using funds from the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) account.
(2) Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
Automatic Vehicle Locator (AVL) systems are currently being used by some law enforcement
departments to remotely track the location of agency units via Global Positioning Satellite
systems (GPS). AVL combines GPS technology, wireless communications, street -level
mapping with Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and a user interface. Ideally, a system
would work as follows: when a call for service is received, the data is input into the Computer
Aided Dispatch (CAD) system and the GIS identifies the coordinates for the location. The AVL
then provides information on agency unit location and the CAD draws upon the GIS and AVL
to assist in formulating a response strategy.
An AVL system would best serve a purpose in the police department patrol division. It would
be installed as a satellite based unit that allows the end user to instantly locate any vehicle.
Each patrol unit would have a vehicle locator unit installed that transmits and receives the
messages. The software locates and tracks the position of vehicles and relays this information
to our terminals and to other vehicles with the mapping program. The vehicles can be seen on
a GIS map with their addresses displayed in the data window. The map also allows us to
navigate between different maps or you can zoom out to see several adjacent areas all at
once.
Continued...
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
None
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget:
Amount Requested
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Ap
riation Required
$19,604 (Local Law Enforcement Block Grant [LLEBG])
$19,604
109 -400- 3105 -8108 (LLEBG grant)
N/A
x Yes _ No
DATE: August 11, 2003
REVIE
Mary S ED DATE:
n, City Manager ' "' /?
11
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION CONTINUED:
Currently, the police department fields 13 patrol division vehicles, which include the K -9 and
supervisor units. These units currently utilize a modem with a built in GPS box. The box
would only need a program and antenna to make it functional. Staff contacted numerous
departments that are currently using an AVL system. There are numerous companies that are
manufacturing stand -alone systems and integrated AVL systems. The best option would be to
purchase a system that integrates with our current CAD system. This option would allow the
AVL status bar to change with the CAD information.
PST Technologies is the company that updates and maintains our mobile CAD system. They
have recently upgraded their CAD software with an AVL option that would easily integrate with
our current CAD. This is important because no other company researched could guarantee
integration with our CAD.
Funds for the purchase would come from the Bureau of Justice Assistance Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant ( LLEBG), which awarded $16,941 in grant funding with a $1,882
cash match from the asset forfeiture funds plus accrued income. The use of LLEBG funds
were reviewed and approved by an advisory board which consisted of a member from each of
the following organizations: law enforcement agency, prosecutor's office, court system, school
system, and a nonprofit organization. Police department staff has worked with the Information
Systems Department and the Technology Advisory Group to ensure the selected program is
fully compatible with city standards and is consistent with the city's Technology Master Plan.
COST
The cost for the equipment is approximately $19,604, which includes related
equipment/supplies, i.e. cabling and GPS antennas.
RECOMMENDATION
An AVL system is a useful officer safety tool. It would allow dispatchers, supervisors, and field
units to instantly see where any vehicle is located. An officer would be able to push an
emergency button, which would notify dispatchers of the emergency and immediately give a
location.
The recommendation is to purchase and utilize an AVL system. The optimal option would be
to upgrade the current West Covina system with their proposed AVL option from PST
Technologies. This would allow a seamless integration with our CAD.
i
1 t.
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding a proposal by the Fire Department for the City to
enter into an agreement with Chevron that would allow the Fire and Police Department's to
load and use Chevron's UHF radio frequency for emergency activities. Fiscal Impact: $6,300
to upgrade radio capabilities.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Authorize City Manager to sign Cooperative Agreement;
2) Approve and authorize the expenditure of funds ($6,300) needed to load the
Chevron frequency and to upgrade the radio capabilities in the Dispatch Center,
Fire Department and Police Department to accommodate the frequency use;
3) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
Currently the City of El Segundo is trying to secure its own frequencies. The frequencies will
be used to meet both Fire and Police primary frequency needs. In addition there is a need for
multiple tactical frequencies for both departments. In the event of a major or protracted
emergency, which requires a tactical channel for reasons related to safety and efficiency,
either Police or Fire must move its primary dispatch communications to the others primary
channel and share this frequency. This is done to free up the other channel needed for the
(Continued on next page)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Cooperative Agreement
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget:
Yes
Amount Requested:
$6,300
Account Number:
001 - 400 - 3255 -6251
Project Phase:
N/A
Appropriation Required:
X Yes _ No
ORIGINATED BY: DATE: 7/29/03
e2o�
a:;
v
Norm Angelo, Fire j ef
� _ / r D-3
REVIEWED BY: DATE:
Mary Stre , City Manager
/J�
0,1
12
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION, continued:
emergency incident (tactical). This places both the Police and Fire Departments on one
channel to carry out any other duties, which can become quite cumbersome.
Without designated tactical channels, operations and personnel safety can be compromised.
Chevron, recognizing our need and the importance of a tactical channel on major incidents,
has offered the use of a UHF frequency owned by their corporation. This frequency would be
used only for emergency incidents or at other times when a separate frequency might be
needed for communications — not for regular dispatching. While one tactical frequency will not
meet our needs in total, it is an initial step in the right direction.
There are some limitations in the use of a commercial frequency, and Chevron incidents would
take precedence over all others — however by having and utilizing a common channel for
operational (tactical) use at incidents located in the refinery, communications, personnel safety
and efficiency between Chevron personnel and El Segundo personnel will be greatly
increased. Mutual Aid units will also be provided access to this frequency in the event that
their help is needed at incidents occurring within the City of El Segundo. As a secondary
benefit, Police units will have limited use of the frequency for serving warrants, during
stakeouts or during other tactical operations. However they may be required to leave the
frequency in the event of a Chevron emergency.
The cost to upgrade existing radios to use the Chevron frequency, based on a proposal from
Advanced Electronics, is estimated at $6,300. This has been discussed with Finance, and the
Fire Department has salary savings to cover the expenditure.
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ( "Agreement") is entered into and
effective this day of , 2003, by and between CHEVRON
PRODUCTS COMPANY, a division of CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., a Pennsylvania
corporation ( "Chevron ") and the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO on behalf of its public safety
officers ( "City ").
RECITALS
A. The Chevron El Segundo Refinery Fire Department ( "CFD ") provides fire
protection and emergency response services to the Chevron El Segundo Refinery
( "Refinery ") located at 324 West El Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo, California.
B. CFD uses a radio band known as call sign KHS42 which operates on
frequency assignment 451.550 ( "Radio Band ").
C. In order to better coordinate CFD's and the City's response to Refinery
emergencies, and to enhance the City's emergency response capabilities, Chevron grants
the City the right to use the Radio Band subject to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises
herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1. RIGHTS GRANTED
Chevron hereby grants authorization to the City to access the Radio Band and to
program the Radio Band on its radios, including its vehicles, on its handhelds and in its
base stations when Chevron places a 911 call and requests that the City respond to the
Refinery, Refinery event, or when the City needs additional bands to handle 911 calls
within its jurisdiction. If the City needs additional assistance from neighboring fire
departments with respect to handling a 911 call concerning the Refinery it may notify
such neighboring fire departments to use the Radio Band solely for that 911 call. The
Radio Band shall be used only by City employees and such neighboring fire departments
and only for the purposes described in this paragraph 1. Once the situation giving rise to
the 911 call is under control, Chevron will notify the City to discontinue use of the Radio
Band. This Agreement does not confer upon Chevron the authority to use the City's
public safety frequencies.
Pagel of 5
7 /
2. TERM
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and
shall continue for a period of five years and may be renewed by the parties to this
Agreement as they deem necessary and appropriate. This Agreement may be terminated
in writing by either party. Such written notice will cause this Agreement to be terminated
immediately. The indemnity granted below in paragraph 3 shall survive termination of
the Agreement.
3. INDEMNITY
Each Party releases the other Party from all liability to itself, its officials, officers,
employees, agents, and certified volunteers, for any claims, damage, or demands for
personal injury, death, or property damage, arising from or related to this Agreement.
Each Party bears sole responsibility for any loss. It is expressly understood and agreed
that this indemnity provision will survive termination of this Agreement.
4. PERSONNEL STATUS
City personnel who may operate the authorized radios on the approved Radio
Band shall at all times be deemed and remain as employees of the City and shall not be
deemed as employees or agents of Chevron.
5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
The City and Chevron agree that each will act as an independent contractor and
will have control of all work and the manner in which it is performed. Chevron is not an
agent or employee of the City and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan,
insurance, bonus or similar benefits the City provides for its employees.
6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
Throughout the term of this Agreement, Chevron and the City shall at all times
comply fully with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations of any
governmental agency, included but not limited to FCC Rules and Regulations, having
jurisdiction over the subject matter of this Agreement.
7. INTERPRETATION
This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance with the laws
of the state of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this Agreement
will be in Los Angeles County.
8. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no
other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written.
Subject to paragraph 2 of this Agreement, this Agreement will bind and inure to the
benefit of the parties to this Agreement and any subsequent successors and assigns.
Page 2 of 5
7C.
1 tJ
9. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION
Each party has independently reviewed this Agreement with legal counsel.
Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance
with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either party.
10. SEVERABILITY
If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction
to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed modified to the extent
necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and, as so
modified, such portion and the balance of this Agreement will continue in full force and
effect.
11. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION
The parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the
parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the
actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment. The
City's City manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of the
City.
12. NOTICES
Any notices required to be made under this Agreement shall be made in writing to
the address of the appropriate party as set forth below. All such notices shall be deemed
to have been duly given and received upon mailing, facsimile, or delivery by courier or
personal delivery service. Parties may alter or modify their notice address by delivery of
written notice pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
To Chevron: Chevron Products Company
324 West El Segundo Boulevard
El Segundo, CA 90245
Attn.: Ralph K. Sproul
Phone: (310) 615 -5751
Fax: (310) 615 -3381
With a copy to: Chevron Products Company
145 S. State College Blvd., Suite 400
Brea, CA 92821 -5818
P.O. Box 2292
Brea, CA 92822 -2292
Attn.: Todd Littleworth, Esq.
Phone: (714) 671 -3279
Fax: (714) 671 -3442
Page 3 of 5
1 .i
To CITY: City of El Segundo Fire Department
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245 -3895
Attn: Battalion Chief John Gilbert
Phone: (310) 524 -2228
Fax: (310) 414 -0929
With a copy to: City of El Segundo Police Department
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245 -3895
Attn: Dave Cummings
Phone: (310) 524 -2250
Fax: (310) 607 -9171
13. ASSIGNMENT
Excluding Paragraph 1 of this Agreement, the City is strictly prohibited from
assigning or transferring this Agreement.
14. COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall
constitute one and the same agreement.
15. WARRANTY OF AUTHORIZED SIGNATORIES
Each person signing this Agreement warrants and represents that he or she is
competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the party for whom
he or she purports to sign.
Page 4 of 5
'.s. 0
16. WARRANTY TO GRANT AUTHORITY.
Chevron warrants and represents that it has control over the Radio Band.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed
on the date(s) set forth below.
CHEVRON:
Dated: 1 , 2003
THE CITY:
Dated: , 2003
ATTEST:
Cindy Mortesen,
City Clerk
APPROZAS F
MARK T By: `
arl H. Berger, s' tant City Attorney
CHEVRON PRODUCTS
COMPANY,
a division of Chevron U.S.A Inc., a
Pennsylvania corporation
By: it",
Name:
Its: EF S (2-
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
a general law City
By:
Name: Mary Strenn
Its: City Manager
Page 5 of 5
.L81
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding a Grant Application with the Governor's Office of
Emergency Services for the development of an emergency response plan for chemical
emergencies. Total Grant Application is for $18,250, with a soft match (staff time/ resources)
of $3,650.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Approve Grant Application for City Manager signature;
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
On an annual basis, grant monies are available to develop transportation plans and programs
for emergency response to hazardous materials incidents. This year, additional funding may
be available to assist the City of El Segundo with the development of required emergency
plans for the release of hazardous materials. The grant requires a soft match of 20 percent,
which can include staff time, City resources and other tangible in -kind services. If awarded,
the deliverable will be an emergency plan that is required to be updated on a triennial basis,
meeting regulatory requirements for the City. The total cost of the project is estimated to be
$18,250.00.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
None
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget: N/A
Amount Requested: $18,250 (grant + soft match)
Account Number: N/A
Project Phase: N/A
Appropriation Required: _Yes X No
ORIGINATED BY: DATE:
Norm Angelo, Fire C ief
REVIEWED BY: DATE:
Mary Stre ,City Manager of
13
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action to waive the formal bidding process on the purchase of 13
Data 911 M5 Mobile Data Computer systems (MDC), in order to be compatible with the Police
Department's recommended MDCs. The total cost is approximately $110,848 using grant and
Fire Department funds in a 90 % -10% share.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Approve the purchase of 13 Data 911 MDC systems and equipment using funds from
the FEMA Assistance to Firefighters Grant Award, Executive Technology Review
Committee approved FY 02/03 funds, and accrued Developers Fees;
2) Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
The police department patrol division vehicles are currently equipped with Mobile Data
Computer systems. They utilize these MDC systems in each patrol unit as a tool for sending
and receiving information to and from the communications center, as well as other
informational databases. The Fire Department has identified the need for similar capabilities
and believes that the addition of this technology will enhance and improve service delivery.
(Continued on next page)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
None
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget: $86,950 (FEMA grant) / $11,400 (ETRC) / $12,500 (Developers Fees)
Amount Requested: $110,850
Account Number: 001 - 300 - 0000 -3735 (Grant Revenue account)
001 - 400 - 3202 -8104 (Grant Expenditure account)
001 - 400 - 2505 -8108 (ETRC)
001 - 400 - 3202 -8104 (Developer Fees)
Project Phase: N/A
Appropriation Required: x Yes _ No
ORIGINATED BY: DATE: August 11, 2003
n
Norm Angelo, Fire Chief
REVIEWED BY: DATE:
Mary Strenn, ity Manager
.181 14
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION, continued:
Working cooperatively with Police department and IT staff, research was conducted and
several computers currently on the market were tested. Some of the criteria used in
evaluating the systems were:
1. Minimum operating technical specifications, i.e. minimum 500 MHz PC, increased
RAM, and hard drive space.
2. Compatibility to upgraded Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and AVL systems.
3. Ergonomics
4. Sunlight viewable screen
5. Reliability
6. Service record
The proposed system is manufactured and sold solely by Data 911. It consists of four
separate components:
1. SunView display unit
2. Keyboard
3. Power Supply
4. Processor unit
Separation of the system in these modules provides more flexible mounting options, better
ergonomics, and the complete accommodation of airbag safety restrictions. A modular system
also allows more effective troubleshooting when problems arise. It allows a portion of the
computer to be sent for service instead of the entire unit.
Based on these factors, as well as the efficiency of having consistency throughout the City, the
Fire department has elected to standardize the specifications for their units to that of the Police
Department.
Cost summary: 13 Data 911 M5 Mobile Data Computer Systems @ $6042 each, totaling
$78,545, plus related equipment, installation, and warranty for a grand total of $110,848.
Funds for the purchase of these computers will come from the FEMA Assistance to
Firefighters Grant, ETRC approved 02/03 funds and accrued Developer Fees. Council has
previously approved the Fire Department's application and acceptance of this grant funding
based on a 90 % -10% cost sharing. The differential in costs between Police and Fire MDCs
relates to modems. The Police Department is able to exchange their existing modems with a
slight increase for the upgrade. The Fire Department modems will be presented as separate
future agenda item since we are currently gathering quotes.
1 '�
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding approval of Service Agreement with the City of
Redondo Beach /South Bay Youth Project, to provide counseling services to El Segundo youth
and families, between September 4, 2004 and June 30, 2004 at a cost of $27,498. (Fiscal
Impact $27,498).
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
(1) Approve Service Agreement Amendment;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute Agreement Amendment;
(3)_ Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
As part of the fiscal 2003 -2004 budget, the City Council approved funding for youth and family
counseling services on a part time basis as a contract service. The existing counseling service
agreement with the South Bay Youth Project (SBYP) is in its final year for extension. The
current agreement and amendment attached has been reviewed by the City Attorney's office,
with specific dates and terms updated. As in 2001 -2002 Service Agreement, and last years
amendment, this year's contract will provide for an onsite counselor, 20 hours perweek, during
the school year with counseling service extensions available for emergency situations during
summer months.
The SBYP will assign a certified Marriage, Family and Child Counselor (M.F.C.C.) to the
project. The counselor will continue to network with the Police department, school district and
Recreation and Parks department, provide statistics with quarterly reports and act as a
community liaison. Under this service agreement, the Counselor will continue to provide
counseling, crisis intervention, verify counseling extensions, conduct client intakes and referral
services and serve as needed with study team interventions. This counseling program covers
a wide variety of individual or family issues. This program is funded through General Fund.
It should be noted that this program differs from the CDBG funded youth counseling service
aimed at assisting "at risk youth" and victims of child abuse. That program is administered by
the Community Economic Development Department and will be considered next by the
Council in June 2004.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Counseling Service Agreement Amendment with the City of Redondo Beach /South Bay Youth
Project.
FISCAL IMPACT: $27,498
Operating Budget: $27,498
Amount Requested: $27,498
Account Number: 001 -400- 5205 -6206
Appropriation Required: Approved: FY 2003 -2004 Budget
ORIGINATED: UA I h: August 5,
Judy Andoe, Recreation Superintend rtt
APPROVED: -:Pu" k,��
Stacia Mancini, Director of Recreation and Parks DATE:
REVIEWED BY: � DATE:
Mary Strenn, City Mager 15
-1 8 :5
SECOND AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC SERVICES AGREEMENT 2917
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND
THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT ( "Amendment ") is made and entered into this 19`h day
of August 2003, by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a general law city and municipal
corporation existing under the laws of California ( "EL SEGUNDO"), and the CITY OF
REDONDO BEACH, a charter city and municipal corporation ( "REDONDO BEACH ").
1. Pursuant to Section 10 of the Parties Public Services Agreement dated September 4, 2001, as
amended on September 17, 2002 (collectively, "Agreement "), the term for services in Section 1
is amended revised to read as follows:
"l. SERVICES
REDONDO BEACH will utilize EL SEGUNDO funds to contract for counseling
services for El Segundo residents for a period of ten (10) months beginning
September 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004. The following services will be
provided in accordance with the conditions herein set forth:"
2. This Amendment may be executed in any number or counterparts, each of which will be an
original, but all of which together constitute one instrument executed on the same date.
3. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to
authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein.
This Amendment and the Agreement may be modified by written amendment. EL SEGUNDO's
city manager may execute any such amendment on EL SEGUNDO's behalf.
4. Except as modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement will
remain the same.
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
Page 1 of 2
.iOCi
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year
first hereinabove written.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Mike Gordon, Mayor Mayor
ATTEST: ATTEST:
Cindy Mortesen,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MARK D. HENSLEY, CITY ATTORNEY
IM
Karl H. Berger,
Assistant City Attorney
Page 2 of 2
Sandy Forrest
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
John Eastman,
Assistant City Attorney
11 8 M,,
JL I
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 2003
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action regarding the waiver of fees for city services associated with
Richmond Street Fair and the American Heart Associations' Heart Walk.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Waive fees for city services associated with the American Heart Association Heart Walk.
2) Waive fees for city services associated with the Richmond Street Fair.
3) Alternatively discuss and take other action on related to this item.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
The Richmond Street Fair and the Heart Association Walk are two community events that
benefit the El Segundo Community. The Recreation and Parks Director has the authority to
issue the permit, for the events, but the fee waiver request must be approved by City Council.
Both of these events are taking place in September. The Heart Walk on Saturday, September
20th and the Richmond Street Fair on Saturday, September 27, 2003. The Chamber of
Commerce sponsors the Richmond Street Fair, and the Heart Walk is sponsored by the
American Heart Association. Both events have been held in El Segundo for years and both
requests are similar to those of years past with fees being waived.
The city services that are being requested are the use of the Show Wagon with a staff person
to operate, police and or cadets and RSVP's for traffic control and barricades for street
closures. In addition, the Chamber would like to use the hot sink for the food vendors, a
portable PA, tables, chairs and some risers for an additional stage area.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Letters of Request from the American Heart Association and the El Segundo Chamber of
Commerce.
Estimated costs of city services.
FISCAL IMPACT: $5,148
Operating Budget:
Amount Requested:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required: _Yes _ No
ORIGINATED: DATE:
Stacia Mancini, Director of Recreation and Parks
REVIEWED BY: DATE:
13
Mary Strenn, City Manager
16
IS
El Segundo Chamber
August 6, 2003 • The Voice for Business -
Ms. Stacia Mancini, Director
Recreation and Parks Department
City of El Segundo
339 Sheldon Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Dear Stacia:
The El Segundo Chamber of Commerce respectfully requests the support of the City of El
Segundo for the 27`x' Annual Richmond Street Fair, scheduled from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on
Saturday, September 27. The Fair will take place in the 100, 200, and 300 blocks of Richmond
Street and the West 100 and 200 blocks of Grand and Franklin Avenues. All businesses and
residences in the affected areas will be notified to minimize their inconvenience.
One of the most significant elements of the Richmond Street Fair is its intended mix of local
community groups and organizations with professional fair exhibitors and vendors. This year's
Fair will be especially significant in bringing our community together during the exciting
transition of our Main Street and Grand Avenue. The City of El Segundo's continuing support
through the years has been the key to the success of the event and enjoyment of all those who
attend and participate.
This year, the El Segundo Chamber of Commerce respectfully requests the following City
assistance and waiver of all permit and use fees:
1. Recreation and Parks Department
a. Use of the Show Mobile for the Adult Stage.
b. Use of the City's portable hot sink for the Food Court.
c. Risers for the Children's Stage.
d. Portable sound system for the Children's Stage.
e. Folding tables and folding chairs for the food court and other areas.
2. Public Works Department
a. Street closures to thru traffic between 6:00 a.m. and 7:30 p.m. in the 100, 200, and
300 blocks of Richmond Street and the West 100 and 200 blocks of Grand and
Franklin Avenues with appropriate barricades and signage.
b. "No Parking" signage posted, on the above streets at the appropriate advance time
for notification
c. Permits to hang two banners or signs at locations to be determined on Sepulveda
Boulevard.
d. Street cleaning 1.5 hours following the close of the Fair
e. Use of City parking lot at Richmond Street and Franklin Avenue.
3. Community, Economic and Development Department
a. Electrical and amplified sound permits.
427 Main Street • El Segundo, CA 90245 • 310 322.1220 • Fax 310 322 6880 i 8,9
Email info @elsegundochamber.org
4. Police Department
a. Notification to MTA of bus rerouting from 6:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.
b. Traffic and parking enforcement assistance as needed
5. Fire Department
a. Fire inspection as necessary.
Exact quantities of items and location plans will be worked out with each department.
Per City requirements, the Chamber will furnish the City with the Chamber's insurance
certificate naming the City of El Segundo as additional insured. The Chamber is requiring each
exhibitor and vendor to furnish their own insurance certificate naming the City and Chamber as
additional insured. The insurance is for $1 million as requested by the City.
Again, our most sincere and deep appreciation to you and the City of El Segundo for your very
precious time and significant assistance in continuing an El Segundo tradition for over a quarter
of a century!
If there are any clarification needs, please notify me, and they will be addressed immediately.
t sincerely yours,
I
Dance ler
Executive Director
From Ricci Blchlmeier At Blchlmeler Insurance Servlces,lnc FaxID 310- 379 -9272 To Daniel L Ehrler
Date 7/29/03 10 56 AM Page 2 of 2
AC _RD. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE OP ID HATE IMMIDDlYWY)
ELSEG -1 07/29/03
PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
Bichlmeier Insurance Services HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
200 Pier Avenue #30 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW
Hermosa Beach CA 90254
Phone:310- 376 -8852 Fax:310- 379 -9272 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC#
INSURED INSURER Maryland Casualty Company 19.35_6___
nauRER 0
E1 Segundo Chamber of Commerce INSURERC -_
427 Main Street NsuREH U
E1 Segundo CA 90245 - -- - - -- -- —
INSURFR F
COVERAGES
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LIS(ED RFLOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED In THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED NOTVYITHSTANDING
ANY REOUIREMFNT TERM OR CONOIT;ON Or ANY CONTRACT OR OTHFR DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH I HIS CFRTIFICATE MAYBE
ISSUED OR
MAY n6PTA-N TIIr INSI IR„N; H AFFORDED BY THE POLILIES 10SCRIBED HCRCIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS
OF SUCH
POLICIES AGGREGATE UMITS SH04N MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAMS
ADD'L -- - POLICY POUCYEFFMTW PDLIOYIXPfIV1110N
LTRINSRD TYPE OF IN SURANCE DATE MMIDD/YY) DATE JMII
LIMITS
GENERAL LIABILITY
EACH OCCURRENCE
f 2000000
A X X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PA5041988354 03/30/03 03/30/04
PREMISFSIFao-urenee)
s2000000--
CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR
MED EXP (Any one Person)
f 10000 _
X Liquor Liab PAS041988354 03/30/03' 03/30/04
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
s2000000 —
rg&FRAI ArCRFCATF
s 400000n
GFN L AGGREGA I E I IMIT APPLIES PER
_
PRODUCTS COMP /OP AGG
_
$ 4000000
}{ POLICY 1CGT ACC
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
s 1000000
A ANY AUTO PASO41988354 03/30/03 03/30/04
L =aaa�denl,
ALL OANEU AUTOS
_
BODILY INJURY
$
SCHE.;UI ED rUTOS
(Pei pe +son)
X HIVED �111TOS
BODILY INJURY
_
X NON- OANFUALTOS
Weracudert)
f
PROPERTY DAMAGE
$
IPer accident)
GARAGE LIABILITY
A-110 ONLY - EA ACCIDENT
$
AN4 AUTO
OTHER THAN FA ACC _5
-
AUTO ONLY AGG
$
EXCESSIUMBRELLA LIABILITY
-
EACH OCCURRENCE
$
OCCUR CLAIMS MAOr
AGGREGATE
$
- - -- _-
-_ - --
DEDUC'IRIE
$
RE rFN'ION f
$
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
VVr- SA
TORY LIMITS ER
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
•
ANY PROPRIE'OR /PARTNER /E %ECUTN E
E L EACII ACCIDENT
i
OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED)
EL DISEASE EA EMPLOYEE
$
It yes desuibe under
--
-- - - ---
SPELIML PROVISIONS below
E L DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT
S
nTHFR
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS I VEHICLES! EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT! SPECIAL PROVISIONS
City of El Segundo and its otticers, officials, employees, agents,
representatives and volunteers are named as additional insureds as
respects
the operations of the named insured for the Richmond Street Fair. This
cov"i -aye is primeary. *10 day notioc of eanaallation for non payxnont
of
premium.
GEKT IFIUATC HULUtK GANGELLA I IUN
UIT YLLS WOULD ANY OF TIIE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES SE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL *30 DAYS WRITTEN
NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT BUT FAILURE TO DO SO $HALL
CITY OF h'L SEGUNDO IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER. ITS AGENTS OR
350 MAIN REPRESENTATIVES
EL SEGUNDO CA 90245 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE /
Cary J. Bichlme /er
ACORD 25 (2001108)
JL
08/07/2003 02:00 5801423 AMERICAN HEART
August 6, 2003
Stacis Mancini
Director of Parks and Recreation
City of F1 Segundo
339 Sheldon Street
E1 Segundo, CA 90245 -4007
Dear Staaa,
PAGE 02
Americans Heart
Association.
Flgh* p Heart Qisaase and Stroke
I am writing to request that the American Heart Assotaatton be put on the City Council's
September 2nd Agenda. We would like to ask for the City Council's approval of the 0
annual American Heart Walls LA — South event, which will be held in El Segundo on
Saturday, September 21st at Mattel Corporate Headquarters. All proceeds from the event
go to the American Heart Association and its life saving masion.
The American Heart Walk is a 5K walk that starts at Martel Headquarters, proceeds
through neighboring streets and then finishes back at Mattel. We are expecting up to 7,000
walkers at the event and about 150 volunteers. In conjunction with the walk there will be a
Wellness Festival and Expo, which takes place on September 20th from Sam -lpm on
Mattel's grounds at 333 Continental Blvd in El Segundo,
The American Heart Association requests the same assistance and fee waivers as in
previous years:
I. The folbwing street closures from 7 30 am —11.30 am: Continental
Boulevard, Mariposa Avenue, Maple Avenue, Nash Street, and Grand
Avenue. to merle m* is nirlosed foryitur npNwsmoce- perpwwr)
2. Street bacrimdes and 200 traffic cones
3. Motorcycle officers for traffic monitontig and safety assistance
4. Police officers at registration area to escort money deposits
5. Disposable trash receptacles and 200 liners from public works
6 Use of the show mobile - portable stage
7. Fire Engine and paramedics on site for demonstration and infocrosuon
8. Use of city generator — Honda 5500
All egwpment and materials can be dropped off September 19, 2003, after 2:00 pm, at
Mattel Corporate Headquarters There is 24 -hour security provided by Mattel. As in
previous years, we would like to work with Judy Andoe regarding logistics involving the
City of El Segundo and their services
'Thank you very much for your tome and consideration.
Sincerely,
)idea Rivera
Director, Corporate Events
American Heart Association
816 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017 -2400
213 -291 -7086
cc Judy Aodoc
�9�
SK Walk Route
Cost Estimates for the Richmond Street Fair
Parks:
Personnel $480.
Showmobile transporting $200
Streets:
Personnel $650
Fire Dept.
Personnel
Fire Prevention $900
Police: No cost
RSVP's working fair
Total: $2,230
Cost Estimates for American Heart Assoc. Heart Walk
Parks:
Personnel $320
Showmobile $200
Streets:
Personnel $950
Police:
Personnel $1,448
Fire:
No cost — on duty
Total: $2,918
1 ,l ?