The URL can be used to link to this page

2001 JAN 16 CC PACKET4 F EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda Items Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City- related business that Is within the jurisdiction of the City Council and/or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portion of the Meeting Additionally, the Public can comment on any Public Hearing item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing portion of such item The time limit for comments is five (5) minutes per person Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state Your name and residence and the organization you represent, if desired Please respect the time limits Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2 00 p in the prior Tuesday) The request must include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not exceed five (5) minutes in length In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 524 -2305 Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 16,2001 - 5:00 P.M. Next Resolution # 4201 Next Ordinance # 1330 5.00 PM Session CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: Appoint Mary Strenn, City Manager, as real property negotiator for Parcel No 6 of Parcel May 17750 (the parking lot in front of the West Basin plant on Sepulveda Boulevard) Recommendation - Discussion and possible action. Ui)i CLOSED SESSION: The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, et sec ) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation, and/or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel), and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as follows CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956 9(a)) 1 City of El Segundo v. Bd of Airport Commissioners, et al, LASC Case No BC 220609 2 Hill v El Segundo, USDC No CV 98- 1463- LGB(SHX) 3 Phillips Petroleum, et al v County of Los Angeles, et al, USDC No 1938 -MRP (MANx) 4 Shell Chemical Company, et al v County of Los Angeles, et al, USDC No 1917 -GHK (RCx) 5 Jeffrey Capistran v El Segundo, LASC Case No YC 038535 6 In re Randall's Island Family Golf, Case No OOB41065 (SMB) 7 Lucas v El Segundo, LASC Case No L04721 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956 9(b) -I- potential case (no further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956 9(c) -2- matters DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) — None. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957 6) — City Representative Mary Strenn, City Manager Employee Organizations City Employees' Association and Supervisory & Professional Employees' Association CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956 8) — Meeting with real property negotiator Mary Strenn regarding Parcel No. 6 of Parcel Map 17750 (the parking lot in front of the West Basin plant on Sepulveda Boulevard) 002 Cq AGEND] EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda Items Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City- related business that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council and/or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portion of the Meeting Additionally, the Public can comment on any Public Heating item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing portion of such item The time limit for comments is five (5) minutes per person Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state Your name and residence and the organization you represent, if desired Please respect the time limits Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2 00 p m the prior Tuesday) The request must include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not exceed five (5) minutes in length to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 524 -2305 Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2001 - 7:00 P.M. Next Resolution # 4201 Next Ordinance # 1330 7:00 PM Session CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION — PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Council Member Nancy Wernick PRESENTATIONS (a) Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to recipients and fudges of "2000 Lighting Up the Community Program " ROLL CALL 003 PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business On1Y - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identtfy themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250 Whale all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda The Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed (b) Request by Andrea Dahm, on behalf of El Segundo Little League, for City approval to close certain City streets for its annual opening day parade from 9 00 a in to 11 00 a in on Saturday, March 3, 2001 (See Consent item #8) A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only Recommendation - Approval. B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS - Public hearing on the proposed projects and budget for allocation of the Fiscal Year 2001- 2002 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds Proposed total Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 CDBG budget $220,058 (Proposed Community Development Commission CDBG 2001 -2001 Allocation - $111,618, Community Development Commission Unallocated CDBG Funds - $75,000, General Fund monies - $33,440) Recommendation — a) Hold public hearing; b) Discussion; c) Consider proposed projects and budget, and direct staff accordingly; d) Authorize the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services to execute agreements with the Community Development Commission; and, e) Authorize the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services to execute agreements in excess of $10,000 with all sub - recipients receiving CDBG funds. 2 Ordinance to revise Title 6 of the El Segundo Municipal Code regarding animal control Recommendation — a) Introduce ordinance. b) Schedule second reading and adoption for February 6, 2001. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS — Water Well Project Report presentation by RBF Recommendation — Discussion and /or possible direction to staff. 004 D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 4. Announce appointments to the Camp Eucalyptus Task Force and set first meeting thereof Recommendation — a) Announce appointments. b) Set first meeting of Camp Eucalyptus Task Force. Review Recreation and Parks Commission recommendation on proposed Skate Park location Recommendation — Approve proposed skate park location. E. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously If a call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business 6 Warrant Numbers 2514652- 2514924 on Register No 6 in total amount of $625,243 32, Wire Transfers in the amount of $1,142,419 94, Warrant Numbers 2514925- 2515155 on Register No 7 in total amount of $724,014 82, and Wire Transfers in the amount of $284,846 00 Recommendation - Approve Warrant Demand Register and Authorize staff to release. Ratify: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or agreements; emergency disbursements and /or adjustments; and wire transfers from 12 /09 /00 to 01/05101. City Council meeting minutes of December 19, 2000 Recommendation - Approval. Request by Andrea Dahm, on behalf of El Segundo Little League, for City approval to close certain City streets for its annual opening day parade from 9 00 a m to 11 00 a m on Saturday, March 3, 2001. (Fiscal impact $460) Recommendation — Approve request, provided the event meets all applicable City requirements. A resolution of the City Council of the City of El Segundo adopting a schedule of fees for work or encroachment in the public nght -of -way (no fiscal impact) Recommendation — Adopt resolution. 10 Agreement for Professional Services between Moreland & Associates, Inc and the City of El Segundo to provide accounting services during a staff leave of absence in the Accounting Division of the Finance Department Recommendation — Approve Agreement for Professional Services between Moreland & Associates, Inc. and the City of El Segundo. 11 Municipal Area Express (MAX) Capital Reserve MOU Amendment Recommendation — Adopt and execute the MAX Capital Reserve MOU Amendment. 005 12 Establishment of a professional service contract with Christopher A Joseph and Associates (CAJA) to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a proposed mixed -use project on a 46 5 acre property bounded by Mariposa Avenue, Nash Street, Atwood Way, and Douglas Street The amount to be paid to the consultant under this agreement is $116,850 00 The full amount of the contract will be paid by the applicant of the project Recommendation — a) Approve a professional services contract with CAJA to prepare an EIR. b) Authorize staff to increase contract by $8,500 if additional traffic counts are required; and, c) Authorize a ten percent contingency increase in the contract if unanticipated analysis is needed. 13 Proposal to purchase one police canine, support equipment and all related training Recommendation — Approve purchase of new canine and all related support items on a sole - source vendor basis. 14 Revocable Lease Agreement between the City of El Segundo and New York Food Company to lease a portion of City property at 630 South Douglas Street (monthly revenue of $618 50) Recommendation — Approve the Revocable Lease Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. 15 Adoption of Plans and Specification for the lining of sanitary sewer access structures at various locations — Protect PW No. 00 -18 (estimated cost $60,000 00) Recommendation — a) Adopt plans and specifications. b) Authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids. 16 Adoption of Ordinance No 1329 which implements the standard urban storm water mitigation plan of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Los Angeles region by amending the El Segundo Municipal Code Chapter 6 28, "Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan Implementation" (no fiscal impact) Recommendation — a) Second reading and adoption of Ordinance, by title only; and /or b) Other possible action /direction. 17 Award of annual concrete contract to C J Construction, Inc for P C C Curb, Curb & Gutter, sidewalk and other minor improvements Public Works Project #PW 00 -14, total contract amount $50.000 00 Recommendation — a) Award contract to the lowest bidder, C. J. Construction, Inc. (see Bid Sheet). b) Authorize the Mayor to sign the standard Public Works construction agreement after approval as to form by the City Attorney. 006 is Recommendation for approval of the 2000/2001 proposed vehicle and equipment purchases in the amount of $206,410 00. Funds approved and available in the 2000/2001 Equipment Replacement Fund Recommendation — Authorize the staff to solicit bids and award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder, purchase designated equipment, and dispose of all identified surplus vehicles and equipment at auction. 19 Acceptance of the lining of sanitary sewer access structures — Prod ect No PW 00 -12 (final contract amount = $62,460 39). Recommendation — a) Accept the work as complete. b) Authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's Office. 20 Application to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (MTA) 2001 Recommendation — Authorize staff to submit an application for the conversion of the Nash Street - Douglas Street one -way system to a two -way street system (estimated cost: $1.65 million). 21 Examination plans for the Personnel Ment System tob classification of Senior Planner Recommendation — Approve the Examination Plans. CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA F. NEW BUSINESS — 22 Presentation by Kilroy Coporahon regarding application to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (MTA) 2001 Call for Projects — Imperial Highway (southside) Streetscane Enrichment Protect, between Nash Street and Pershing Drive Recommendation — After Kilroy Corporation's presentation of this Imperial Highway landscape project, the Council may authorize staff to submit an application for the MTA 2001 Call for Projects. (Estimated project cost = $1.6 million — Local Agency Match, which can include funds from public and private sources = $320,000). G. REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - NONE H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY - NONE L REPORTS - CITY CLERK - NONE J. REPORTS - CITY TREASURER - NONE K. REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Council Member McDowell - NONE 007 Council Member Gaines — 23 Discussion of ongoing electrical power issues Recommendation — Discussion and/or possible direction to staff. Council Member Wernick — 24 Request to determine Council interest in and representation at the National League of Cities' Congressional City Conference 2001 entitled "Investing in Communities — Investing in America's Future," to be held March 9 -13, 2001 in Washington, D C Recommendation — Discussion and /or possible direction to staff. Mayor Pro Tem Jacobs - NONE Mayor Gordon — NONE PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalfofanother, and employees speaking on behadfof their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250 While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda The Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed MEMORIALS — Adjournment in memory of retired City employee George Greene and resident Bob Bramhall CLOSED SESSION The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code Sec 54960, et seq ) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator, and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation, and/or discussing matters covered under Government Code section 54957 (Personnel), and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators, as follows Continuation of matters listed on the City Council Agenda for 5 00 p in , January 16, 2001 under "Closed Session" (if needed) REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required) ADJOURNMENT POSTED DATE e, i o o I TIME NAM 01 1601a 00 8 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Special Order of Business - Public Hearing AGENDA DESCRIPTION Public hearing on the proposed projects and budget for allocation of the Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds Proposed total Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 CDBG budget $220,058 (Proposed Community Development Commission CDBG 2001 -2002 Allocation- $111,618, Community Development Commission Unallocated CDBG Funds — $75,000 General Fund monies - $ 33,440) RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1) Hold public hearing, 2) Discussion, 3) Consider proposed projects and budget, and direct staff accordingly, 4) Authorize the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services to execute agreements with the Community Development Commission, and, 5) Authorize the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services to execute agreements in excess of $10,000 with all sub - recipients receiving CDBG funds NTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUN Each year, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are allocated to cities by the Federal Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) and administered through the Los Angeles County Community Development Commission (CDC) Participating cities receive funding based upon the total number of cities participating in the County's program, and a city's commitment to provide housing, economic, social service, and community development opportunities which principally benefit persons of low and moderate income levels There will be little or no change in CDBG funding levels from last year DISCUSSION Since 1986, the City of El Segundo has annually participated in the Los Angeles Urban County's CDBG Program In order to continue its participation in the upcoming 2001 -2002 program year, which begins on July 1, 2001 and ends on June 30, 2002, the City of El Segundo must prepare and submit its proposed CDBG project descriptions to the Community Development Commission by February 1, 2001, for review and approval (Continued on next page) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS 1) Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 estimated CDBG allocation — Los Angeles County Community Development Commission, FISCAL IMPACT Operating Budget CDBG /General Fund /CDBG Unallocated Amount Requested $111,618 CDBG 01 -02 / $33,440 (General Fun Project/AccountBudget Project/Account Balance* Date Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 Account Number: CDBG - Fund 111 / Gen Fund - 001 Project Phase N/A Appropriation Required - Yes_ No _X ORIGINATED Date. January 10, 2001 James M Hansen, Director'of Community, Eco&mic and Development Services REVIEWED BY Date ' M ry Strenn, ttv Manaoer �G i ACTION T 010 1 DISCUSSION. (Continued) Pursuant to Federal requirements, notice of this public hearing was posted in various public buildings within the City Federal requirements also mandate that as part of the hearing, the Council and public be informed of the range of eligible housing and community development activities that may be funded under the CDBG program Interested persons may obtain a copy of the Federal eligibility guidelines, available at the City of El Segundo's Department of Community, Economic and Development Services, from 7 30 a m to 5 30 p m Monday through Friday Proposed 2001 -2002 CDBG Proiects and Budget The proposed 2001 -2002 CDBG allocation for the City of El Segundo is $111,618 However, this is a planning estimate only, the Los Angeles County Community Development Commission (CDC) does not receive the final appropnabon from HUD until Spring 2001 The City's final CDBG allocation may be more or less than the planning estimate Generally, however, the final allocation is within ten percent of the estimate provided The 2001 -2002 CDBG program year may operate within a 25% public service limit (for the 2001 -2002 Program Year only), and a 10% General Administration limit as mandated by the Federal regulations Twenty -five percent of the City's annual CDBG allocation for 2001 -2002 equals approximately $27,900 Thus, a maximum of $27,900 in CDBG funds may be cumulatively expended on all public service projects Since the City of El Segundo typically devotes a total of $56,500 annually to its CDBG public service projects which include Home Delivered Meals, Senior In -Home Care and Juvenile Diversion, supplemental funds totaling $28,600 must be identified in order to maintain existing public service project levels Similarly, ten percent of the City s 2001 -2002 allocation is $11,160 CDBG administrative services have intensified due to changes in the Federal reporting and management requirements Thus, in order to maintain existing CDBG management services, General Fund monies totaling $4,840 will be required to supplement the 2001 -2002 CDBG Administration Therefore, the total General Fund Supplement for 2001 -2002 equals $33,440 There will be little or no change in CDBG costs for the 2001 -2002 Program Year The General Fund Supplement was adopted as part of the City of El Segundo's Fiscal Year 2000 -2001 Final Operating Budget A complete list of the proposed CDBG 2001 -2002 projects and budgets are General Fund Total Budget CDBG Allocation Supplement Home Delivered Meals (Public Service) $16,000 $9,300 $ 6,700 Under a continuing public service agreement with Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital, approximately 5,000 meals are delivered to El Segundo low and moderate income elderly and severely handicapped persons annually Additional revenues of approximately $9,000 in donations are anticipated This increases the total budget to $25,000 Senior In -Home Care (Public Service) $24,500 $9,300 $15,200 Under a continuing public service agreement with Just Right Help, Inc, approximately 600 home visits are made annually to El Segundo low and moderate income elderly and severely handicapped persons Juvenile Diversion (Public Service) $16,000 $9,300 $ 6,700 Under a continuing public service agreement with the South Bay Youth Project, approximately 400 counseling service hours are provided by licensed family therapists to El Segundo at -risk youth 011 Total Budget CDBG Allocation General Fund Supplement Minor Home Repair $72,500 $72,500 0 The Minor Home Repair project provides financial assistance to qualified low and moderate income, single family, owner - occupied condominium and homeowners to make necessary minor home improvements No interest, deferred loans up to $7,500 may be approved for minor home improvements Additionally, recent changes in the federal CDBG regulations now require every housing rehabilitation project to comply with federal lead -based paint identification and remediation Thus, in conjunction with no- interest, deferred loans, eligible homeowners will be offered direct grants to compensate for the costs associated with lead - based paint hazard evaluation and reduction requirements Administration (max 10 %) $16,000 $11,160 $4,840 Public Facilities and Improvements — City Hall West Handicapped Accessible Elevator $200,000 $75,000 ($125,000 (City- budgeted CIP) not included in total General Fund Supplement) CDBG funds will pay for a portion ($75,000 of the $200,000 total cost) of the construction costs associated with the installation of a new handicapped accessible elevator in City Hall west Unspent funds from previous program years' closed -out projects totaling $ 75,000 are available for reallocation to new or continuing eligible CDBG projects These unspent, unallocated CDBG funds exist in a "contingency' account held by the Los Angeles County Community Development Commission and the City may apply for the funds for eligible CDBG projects Any unexpended funds at the end of the program year are not lost, they are "rolled over" into the next budget year for reprogramming (public service projects, such as Home Delivered Meals, Senior In -Home Care, Juvenile Diversion, and CDBG General Administration are excluded from these reallocated funds) Certain public improvement projects that remove architectural barriers for severely handicapped and elderly persons are eligible under the CDBG guidelines Thus, the installation of a handicapped accessible elevator in City Hall west complies with the CDBG regulations cdbecl 012 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA DESCRIPTION: MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 AGENDA HEADING: Special Matter Ordinance to revise Title 6 of the El Segundo Municipal Code regarding animal control RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1 Introduce ordinance 2 Schedule reading and adoption for February 6, 2001 BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: On October 17, 2000, City Council gave staff the go ahead to proceed with the new animal control project As the project moves forward, staff has reviewed the current animal control sections of the El Segundo Municipal Code Revision and drafting of ordinances have taken place These changes are essential for the new project to proceed ahead ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Proposed ordinance FISCAL IMPACT- Operating Budget: None Amount Requested: None Account Number: None Project Phase: Appropriation required: None TED: n DATE: January 10, mmond, ChieTdf Police REVIEWED Y• DATE: Ma r , i y anager 4/ i I� 1/10/01 1 46 51 3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE EL SEGUNDO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ANIMAL CONTROL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 Title 6 of the El Segundo Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows CHAPTER1 COUNTY REGULATIONS SECTION 6 -1 -1 Incorporation of Title 10, Los Angeles County Code 6 1 1 INCORPORATION OF TITLE 10, LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE Title 10 of the Los Angeles Code, with the exception of title 10, section 10 90.010 (VI) and section 10 90 010 (VII) is hereby incorporated into the City Code To the extent any provision of the Los Angeles Code Incorporated hereby is inconsistent with some other provision of this code, the later provision shall be controlling Incorporation of title 10 including section 10 04 060 which states A Any person violating any of the provisions of this title is guilty of an infraction unless another penalty is provided for in this title B Violation of sections 10 12 190 10 12 200 10 20 280 10 20 310 10.28 060 10 32.020 10 32 070 10.32.080 10 37 030 10 37 050(c) 10 37 060(f) 10 40 010 ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 1 014 10 40.040 10 86.010 of this title is a misdemeanor (Ord 90 -0089, 1990 Ord. 89 -0166, 1989, Ord 87 -0191 16, 1987, Ord 83 -0043 1, 1983; Ord 9454 1 (part), 1967, Ord 4729 Art 1 108, 1946) (Ord 1274, 6 -16 -1997) CHAPTER ANIMALS SECTION 62 1 Animals Permitted 622 Animals Prohibited 6 2 3 Animals At Large 6 2 4 Animal Care 62 5 Public Nuisance 6 2 6 Permits Required 6 2 7 Application For Permit 6 2 8 Criteria For Approval 6 2 9 Expiration Of Permits 6 2 10 Appeal Decision Of Director, Fee 6 2 11 Planning Commission Hearing, Notice, Decision 6 2 12 Grounds For Revocation 6 2 1 ANIMALS PERMITTED A Generally It shall be lawful for any person to keep or maintain or have in possession or under control in the City the following animals 1 Canaries, pigeons, doves or birds of the psittacine family kept as household pets or as a hobby only, not exceeding ten (10) in number, when kept in facilities that are humane and adequate as to noise, sanitation and security- 2 Fish and turtles kept as household pets or as a hobby only, 3 Hamsters, white rates or guinea pigs as household pets or as a hobby only, not exceeding ten (20) in the aggregate and the young thereof not exceeding three (3) months in age, (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972) ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 2 015 4 Hen chickens, kept as household pets or as a hobby, not to exceed five (5) in number when kept in facilities that are humane and adequate as to noise, sanitation and security, (Ord. 825, 11 -20 -1973) 5 Rabbits as household pets or as a hobby only, not exceeding four (4) in number and the young thereof not exceeding four (4) months in age, 6 In one - family and two - family dwellings or duplexes, dogs and cats not to exceed three (3) for each residential living unit in any combination thereof and the young thereof not exceeding four (4) months in age, 7 In dwelling units other than one - family and two - family dwellings or duplexes, one dog or cat per unit and the young thereof not exceeding four (4) months in age, 8 Except in residential districts, dogs used for guard or sentry purposes (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972) B Circus All animals enumerated in this Chapter may be kept within the City in connection with any circus, carnival or wild west show, or in conjunction with any parade for which a permit has been issued, provided, however, that without the approval of the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services, animals may not be brought Into the City more than twenty four (24) hours before the first performance of the circus, carnival or wild west show or the start of the parade, as the case may be, nor may animals be kept within the City without the approval of the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services for more than twenty four (24) hours after the conclusion of the last performance of a circus, carnival or wild west show or within twenty four (24) hours after the conclusion of a parade C Laboratory All animals enumerated in this Chapter may be kept within the City in connection with a laboratory that holds a valid clinical laboratory permit issued by the State Department of Health D School All animals enumerated in this Chapter may be kept within the City in a public or private school license by the State (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972, amd Ord 1315, 1 -18 -2000) 6 2 2 ANIMALS PROHIBITED Except as provided in subsections 6 -2 -113, C, and D of this Chapter, no person shall keep or maintain or have in his possession or under his control any poisonous or venomous snake or any wild, carnivorous animal (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972) ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 3 O 6 2 3 ANIMALS AT LARGE It is unlawful for any person owning or having possession, charge, custody or control of any animal or fowl to cause, permit or allow the same to stray or run, or in any other manner to be at large in or upon any public highway, street, avenue, roadway, road, way, lane, alley, park., square, sidewalk or other public place in the City, or in or upon any unenclosed lot, land or premises, or to stake out, herd or graze any animal or fowl upon any unenclosed lot, land or premises in such manner that the rope or other attachment by which the same is tethered may permit it to be or to go beyond the boundary of the lot, land or premises, provided, however, that the provisions of this Section shall not apply in the case of animals lawfully upon the public highway, street, road, roadway, avenue, way, lane, alley, park, square, sidewalk or other public place and which are temporarily hitched to hitching weights, devices or posts at the curb or side of the highway, road, roadway, street, lane, park, square, sidewalk, way, avenue, alley or place, or which are otherwise located therein (Ord 431, 1 -27 -1954) 6 2 4 ANIMAL CARE Requirements for owners and kennel operators Every person, within the City, who owns any animal or who owns, conducts, manages or operates any kennel for which a permit is required by this title, shall comply with each of the following conditions A Housing facilities for animals shall be structurally sound and shall be maintained in good repair, to protect the animals from injury, to contain the animals, and to restrict the entrance of other animals B All animals shall be supplied with sufficient good and wholesome food and water as often as the feeding habits of the respective animals require C All animals and all animal buildings or enclosures shall be maintained In a clean and sanitary condition D All animals shall be so maintained as to eliminate excessive and nighttime noise E No animals shall be without attention more than 12 consecutive hours Whenever an animal is left unattended at a kennel, the telephone number of the police department, or the name, address and telephone number of the responsible person, shall be posted in a conspicuous place at the front of the property F Every reasonable precaution shall be used to insure that animals are not teased, abused, mistreated, annoyed, tormented or in any manner made to suffer by any person or means. ORDINANCE NO AMENDING SSMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 4 01i G No condition shall be maintained or permitted that is or could be injurious to the animals H Animal buildings and enclosures shall be so constructed and maintained as to prevent escape of animals. All reasonable precautions shall be taken to protect the public from the animals and the animals from the public Every animal establishment shall isolate sick animals sufficiently so as not to endanger the health of other animals Sick animals shall at all times be isolated from the other animals. J Every budding or enclosure wherein animals are maintained shall be constructed of material easily cleaned and shall be kept in a sanitary condition The budding shall be properly ventilated to prevent drafts and to remove odors Heating and cooling shall be provided as required, according to the physical need of the animals, with sufficient light to allow observation of animals and sanitation K Such person shall take any animal to a veterinarian for examination or treatment, If the director finds this is necessary in order to maintain the health of the animal and orders the owner or custodian to do so L All animal rooms, cages, kennels and runs shall be of sufficient size to provide adequate and proper accommodations for the animals kept therein M Every violation of an applicable regulation shall be corrected within a reasonable time to be specified by the Chief of Police. N Such person shall provide proper shelter and protection from the weather at all times O Such person shall not give an animal any alcoholic beverage, unless prescribed by a veterinarian P Such person shall not allow animals that are natural enemies, temperamentally unsuited, or otherwise incompatible, to be quartered together, or so near each other as to cause injury, fear or torment If two or more animals are so trained that they can be placed together and do not attack each other or perform or attempt any hostile act to the others, such animals shall be deemed not to be natural enemies ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMALCONTROL PAGE NO 5 O l d Q Such person shall not allow the use of any tack, equipment, device, substance or material that is, or could be, injurious or cause unnecessary cruelty to any animal R Such person shall not allow any animal to cause a hazard, or be a menace to the health, peace or safety of the community 6 2 5 PUBLIC NUISANCE A Any animal (or animals) which molests passersby or passing vehicles, attacks other animals, trespasses on school grounds, is repeatedly at large, damages and or trespasses on private or public property, barks, whines or howls in an excessive, continuous or untimely fashion, shall be considered a public nuisance. B Every person who maintains, permits or allows a public nuisance to exist upon his or her property or premises, and every person occupying or leasing the property or premises of another and who maintains, permits or allows a public nuisance as described above to exist thereon, after reasonable notice in writing from the City has been served upon such person to cease such nuisance, is guilty of an infraction The existence of such nuisance for each and every day after the service of such notice shall be deemed a separate and distinct offense 6 2 6 PERMITS REQUIRED A Compliance, Permit It shall be unlawful for any person to keep or maintain, or have in possession or under control in the City, any living member of the animal kingdom except human beings, except as permitted by this Chapter and without having applied for and received a permit as hereinafter provided B Permit For Keeping Animals Any person may keep animals other than or in excess of the animals enumerated in subsection 6.2 1A of this Chapter and may keep the animals enumerated in Section 6 2.2 of this Chapter in the circumstances described in subsections 6 2 1 B, C and D of this Chapter by securing a permit for the keeping of such animals (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972) 6 2 7 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT An application for a permit shall be initiated by filing a verified application on a form furnished by the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services stating fully the applicant's name, address, and telephone number, the number and kind of animals for which a permit is requested, the number and kind of other animals kept on the premises; the type ORDINANCE NO _ AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 6 Cj and location of caging, if applicable, and other Information required by the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services upon receipt of the application The Director of Community, Economic and Development Services shall make or cause to be made such Investigation as he deems appropriate (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972, amd Ord 1315, 1 -18 -2000) 6.2 8 CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL The Director of Community, Economic and Development Services shall Issue or renew the permit If he finds- A That the Issuance of such permit will not adversely affect the public peace, health or safety, B That the keeping of such animal will not violate any provision of law, and C That the facilities for keeping such animals are humane and adequate under the circumstances as to noise, security and sanitation (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972, amd Ord 1315, 1 -18 -2000, 2000 Code) 6 2 9 EXPIRATION OF PERMITS All permits issued on or before October 31 of any year shall expire on December 31 of that year. Any permit issued on or after November 1 of any year shall expire on December 31 of the next succeeding year (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972) 6 2 10 APPEAL DECISION OF DIRECTOR, FEE Any person dissatisfied with the decision of the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services may file an appeal of such decision with the Planning Commission by filing a written notice of appeal in letter form accompanied by a fee of twenty five dollars (a25 00), said fee to cover the cost of posting, postage, advertising and other costs Incident to the proceedings Said notice of appeal may be filed at any time after the decision of the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services has been made, provided, however, that an appeal may not be filed on the granting of such permit after ten (10) days have expired from the action of the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services in granting such permit (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972, amd Ord 1315, 1 -18 -2000) 6 2 11 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING, NOTICE: DECISION: A Hearing Notice When an appeal is filed, the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services shall give notice of a public hearing by mailing a letter notice, first class mad with postage prepaid, to the applicant and to the owners of property abutting the boundary of the property that is the subject of the application for an animal permit, using for this purpose the last known name and address of such owners as shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of Los Angeles County. Such notice shall ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 7 C20 contain the address, a general explanation of the matter to be considered, and the time and place at which the public hearing on the matter will be held B Decision By Resolution The Planning Commission shall announce Its decision by resolution (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972; amd Ord. 1 15, 1 -18 -2000) C Decision Final Any action by the Planning Commission on such matters shall be final and conclusive Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972, amd 2000 Code) D Notice Of Decision Not later than fifteen (15) days following the adoption of a resolution ordering that an appeal be granted or denied, a copy of the resolution shall be mailed to the applicant and to any other person requesting notice of the action (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972) 6 2 12 GROUNDS FOR REVOCATION Any animal permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter may be revoked by the Planning Commission In the event the Planning Commission determines to initiate proceedings for the revocation of any animal permit, said Commission shall adopt a resolution declaring its intention to revoke such permit and fix a time and place for a hearing on said resolution No such hearing shall be held unless a copy of the resolution is ma led to the permittee not less than five (5) days prior to the hearing. At such hearing the Planning Commission shall hear all evidence presented material to its determination and may revoke the permit following such hearing by resolution after it finds A That the permit, or a prior permit of which the permit is an extension was obtained by fraud, or B That the permittee has violated the law in keeping such animal, or C That the animal or animals endanger the public peace, health or safety (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972) CHAPTER DOGS SECTION 6 3 1 Definitions 6 3 2 Licensing Requirements 6 33 License Tags 6 3 4 Receipt Blanks 6 3 5 Kennel Licenses ORDINANCE NO _ AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 8 I? U 2 1 6 3.6 Suspension Or Revocation of Dog License 637 Refusing to Show License Unlawful 6 3 8 Running At Large Prohibited 6 3 9 Dangerous Dogs, Impoundment, Hearing 6.3.10 Rabies Control 6 3 11 Dog Park Rules 6312 Interfering with Animal Control Officers Prohibited 6313 Interference with Police Dogs 6 3 1 DEFINITIONS The following words when used in this Chapter shall, for the purposes of this Chapter, have the meanings respectively ascribed to them in this Section DOG Includes male and female KENNEL A place where four (4) or more adult dogs or cats or any combination thereof, are kept, whether by owners of the dogs and cats or by persons providing activities and care, whether or not for compensation. An adult dog or cat is one of either sex, altered or unaltered, that has reached the age of four (4) months POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG Any of the following. A Any dog which, when unprovoked, on two (2) separate occasions within the prior thirty six (36) month period, engages in any behavior that requires a defensive action by any person to prevent bodily injury when the person and the dog are off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog B Any dog which, when unprovoked, bites a person causing a less severe injury than as defined in section 31604 of the State Food and Agriculture Code C Any dog which, when unprovoked, on two (2) separate occasions within the prior thirty six (36) month period, has killed, seriously bitten, inflicted injury, or otherwise caused injury attacking a domestic animal off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog VICIOUS DOG Any of the following A Any dog seized under section 599aa of the Penal Code and upon the sustaining of a conviction of the owner or keeper under subdivision (a) of section 597 5 of the Penal Code B Any dog which, when unprovoked, in an aggressive manner, inflicts severe injury on or kills a human being ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 9 022 C Any dog previously determined to be and currently listed as a potentially dangerous dog which, after its owner or keeper has been notified of this determination, continues the behavior described in the definition of "potentially dangerous dog" in this Section, or is maintained in violation of section 31641, 31642, or 31643 of said State Food and Agriculture Code. 2000 Code) 6 3 2 LICENSING REQUIREMENTS A License Required, Exceptions 1 Except as provided in this Chapter, it is unlawful for any person to have, keep, maintain or harbor within the City any dog without first having obtained from the City an annual license so to do upon the payment of the fee required by subsection B of this section 2 it shall not, however, be necessary to purchase a license or to pay a license fee for any dog under the age of four (4) months whether the same is male or female. 3 It is further provided, however, that the license fee shall not apply to any dogs kept or maintained exclusively in any dog kennel in the City (Ord 431, 1 -27 -1954) B Annual License Fees Upon the effective date hereof, the annual license fee for keeping and maintaining an unaltered dog in the City is fixed at the sum of forty dollars ($40 00) per year The annual license fee for a spayed or neutered dog shall be twenty dollars ($20 00) per year, if a certificate is presented from a licensed veterinarian verifying that the dog has been spayed or neutered (Ord 1091, 1 -6 -1987) C Discount For Senior Citizens A fifty percent (50 %) discount on the dog license fee shall be made available to any resident sixty -two (62) years of age or older who makes application for the discount (Ord 972, 6 -19 -1970, amd 2000 Code) D Seeing eye or guide dogs are those dogs that have been especially trained to lead and aid the blind or deaf Any blind or deaf person having custody of such a dog may keep and harbor the dog within the City by obtaining a license to keep a dog as provided herein, and may lawfully take the dog into any food establishment within the City There will be no fee charged for such dogs upon proof of antirabies vaccination E Date Payable, Proration, Penalty ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 10 G23 I Any license fee required to be paid by this Chapter shall be payable annually in advance on March 1 of each year, and the license shall expire at midnight on the last day of February of the following year The full amount of the license fee shall be payable for any license falling due during the period from January 1 of the year to June 30 of the year 2 Fifty percent (50 %) of the amount of the license fee shall be payable for any license falling due subsequent to September 30 of the year for the remaining fraction of the year 3 Any license fee payable under the provisions of this Chapter remaining unpaid for a period of thirty (30) days after the same shall become payable hereunder, shall be subject to a penalty of fifty percent (50 %) of the fee due, which penalty shall be collected by the license collector at the time of the collection of the license fee, and shall be in addition to the principal sum thereof In determining whether or not a penalty has accrued under the provisions of this Chapter, the License Collector may require an affidavit from any person claiming exemption from the payment of any penalty hereunder, which affidavit shall set forth the facts upon which the claim for the exemption is based. (Ord. 973, 6 -19 -1979, amd 2000 Code) F Failure To Pay License Fee Whenever any person owning, harboring or having the care or custody of any dog fails to pay the license fee provided and specified in this Chapter for the dog, the poundmaster may cause the dog to be seized and kept in the public pound for the period and in the manner and upon the terms, conditions and requirements as specified in this Chapter. (Ord 431, 1 -27 -1954) 6 3 3 LICENSE TAGS A Contents The City shall each year procure a sufficient number of suitable metallic license tags to meet the requirements of this Chapter, numbered from one upward consecutively, on which tags shall be stamped the date of their expiration and the license number, and shall issue the same to the poundmaster in consecutive order as may be required, keeping an account thereof B Duplicate The charge of one dollar ($1.00) shall be made for the issuance of a license and metallic tag to replace a lost license or tag ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL n PAGE NO 11 n 2 4 C Affixing To Dog Collar. The owner or person having the care, control or custody of any dog upon which the license fee has been paid shall securely fasten the metallic license tag upon a suitable collar and securely fasten the collar with the tag attached thereto upon the dog A dog harness or other device may be substituted in lieu of the collar, if so desired (Ord. 431, 1 -27 -1954) 6 3 4 RECEIPT BLANKS The City shall cause to be printed a sufficient number of receipt blanks to meet the requirements of this Chapter The receipt blanks shall provide for the description of the dog for which the license fee is paid, the number of the metallic license tag which has been issued for the dog and also the name and address of the owner of the dog The receipts shall also designate the rabies vaccination date and tag number and the sex of the dog for which the license fee has been paid (Ord 733, 1 -26 -1970) 6 3 5 KENNEL LICENSES A License Required, Fee Any person conducting, managing or maintaining a dog kennel as defined in Section 6.3 1 of this Chapter shall pay to the City for the privilege of conducting or maintaining the dog kennel a fee of twenty four dollars ($24.00) per year for the kennel which shall entitle the kennel operator to maintain ten (10) or fewer dogs An additional license fee of twenty -four dollars ($24 00) shall be paid for ten (10) dogs, or fraction thereof, in excess of the first ten (10) dogs (Ord 733, 1 -26 -1970) B Operation Permit No kennel license shall be issued unless a written permit to have, maintain or operate the kennel is first obtained from the City Council Before granting the permit, the City Council shall refer the application therefor to the Planning Com- mission, poundmaster and to the Health Officer for investigation, report and recommendation to the City Council with reference thereto (Ord 431, 1 -27 -1954) C Every person owning or operating any kennel shall keep all animals therein under proper confinement on the premises and shall not cause, permit or allow such animals to be or to run at large D Records required for each animal The holder of a kennel license shall keep available for inspection, on the premises, a record that shall show 1 The name, current address and telephone number of the owner of each animal kept at the kennel, 2 The date such animal entered the kennel, 3 The reason for such animal being at the kennel, such as for boarding, sale, breeding or grooming, ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 12 L�5 4 The description of the animal, including its age, breed, sex and color, 5. That there exists a current, valid rabies certificate for every dog over four months of age so long as such dog is kept at the kennel 6 3 6 SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF DOG LICENSE The Chief of Police, or his or her designee, shall have, and the Chief of Police, or his or her designee, expressly reserves the right and power, notwithstanding any other provision, term or condition in this Chapter contained to the contrary, to suspend and also to revoke any dog license issued under the provisions of this Chapter, if at any time it appears to the Chief of Police, or his or her designee, or the Chief of Police, or is or her designee, finds that any dog described or referred to in any dog license, or for which any dog license has or may be issued under this Chapter is vicious, dangerous or apt to bite or inure any person. (Ord 1258, 6 -19 -1996) 6 3 7 REFUSING TO SHOW LICENSE UNLAWFUL Any person upon whom any demand is made under authority of this Title for the exhibition of any dog, rabies vaccination certificate, or any dog license or tag, who fails or refuses to exhibit the same if he has it in his possession, is guilty of a violation of this section 6 3 8 RUNNING AT LARGE PROHIBITED A No person owning or having charge, custody, possession or control of any dog shall, and it is unlawful for any person to cause, permit or allow the same to be, or to run at large in or upon any highway, street, lane, alley, court or other public place, or in or upon any private property or premises, other than those of the person owning or having charge, custody, possession or control of the dog within the City, unless the dog is restrained by a substantial leash not to exceed six feet (6') in length and is in charge, custody, possession or control of a competent person (Ord.360, 11 -8 -1949) B This provision shall not apply to public areas of the City officially designated as a "dog park" or to police service dogs while such dogs are under the control of a peace officer. 6 3 9 DANGEROUS DOG, IMPOUNDMENT; HEARING: A Filing Of Opinion, Impoundment Whenever any dog is, in the written opinion of the poundmaster, file with the City Clerk, vicious, dangerous, potentially dangerous or apt to bite or injure any person, and is kept in such manner as to constitute an apparent menace to any person, the dog may be immediately impounded by ORDINANCE NO AMENDING SSMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 13 Oct the poundmaster or his duly authorized agents, representatives or assistants B Notice Of Impoundment, Opinion, Hearing. As soon as reasonably possible after the dog is so impounded, or a written opinion is filed with the City Clerk, the owner of the dog, or the person harboring the dog, or the person to whom the license for the dog was issued or any person whose name appears therein, shall be notified, either personally or by mail addressed to the person, at the address shown in the license, of the fact of the impounding or of the filing of the written opinion and that the person or any person interested may appear at a hearing before the Chief of Police, or his or her designee, to be specified in the notice, the notice of hearing to be served at least forty eight (48) hours prior to the time of the hearing, and show cause if the person can, why the dog should not be destroyed The notification shall also contain or have attached thereto a copy of the opinion so filed, if any C Hearing, Decision Upon the hearing, the Chief of Police, or his or her designee, shall hear all persons who appear and desire to be heard, and shall thereupon decide whether the dog shall be released, destroyed or otherwise disposed of, and the decision of the Chief of Police, or his or her designee, after the hearing, shall be final and conclusive (Ord 1258, 6 -19 -1996, amd 2000 Code) D Any dog declared after a hearing to be dangerous, if not already impounded by the department, shall be immediately surrendered to the department A violation of the provisions of this subsection is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding $500.00, or by imprisonment in the county fail for a period not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment 6310 RABIES CONTROL A Vaccination Requirements 1 Vaccination Required, Exception Every person keeping, harboring or having a dog over the age of four (4) months in the City shall cause the dog to be vaccinated with rabies vaccine within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of harboring, keeping or having the dog within the City, or from the date the dog attains the age of four (4) months, provided, however, that the aforesaid provision shall not apply so as to require the vaccination of any dog which has been vaccinated with a chick embryo vaccine by a person licensed by the State or of any other state or nation to practice ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 14 027 veterinary medicine where the vaccination has been completed within the period of time prescribed in this Section If chick embryo vaccine was used in the vaccination, it must have been completed within two (2) years prior to the date the dog was kept, harbored or brought Into the City If tissue phenolized vaccine was used, the vaccination must have been completed within one year prior to the date the dog was kept, harbored or brought Into the City (Ord 526, 5 -12- 19513) 2 Revaccination a Every person keeping, harboring or having a dog in the City that has been vaccinated with chick embryo vaccine shall cause the dog to be revaccinated within a period of not more than two (2) years after the prior vaccination b Every person keeping, harboring or having a dog in the City which has been vaccinated with tissue phenolized vaccine shall cause the dog to be revaccinated with rabies vaccine within a period of not more than one year after the prior vaccination 3 Vaccination Certificate Issuance. Every person practicing veterinary medicine in the City who vaccinates a dog with rabies vaccine shall issue to the person keeping, harboring or having the dog a certificate, which is signed by the veterinarian and which states thereon the name and description of the dog, the date of the vaccination and the type of vaccine used (Ord. 510, 9 -30 -1957) 4 Certificate And Tag, Exhibition a Every person applying for a dog license, whether to the poundmaster under contract to the City, or to the City, shall exhibit a certificate and rabies vaccination tag issued by a person licensed by the State or any other state or nation to practice veterinary medicine, which certificate shall show that the dog for which the license shall be issued either- (1) Has been vaccinated in accordance with the provisions of subsections All and A2 of this Section, or ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE b ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 15 028 (2) Should not be vaccinated with rabies vaccine by reason of age, infirmity or other disability, which disability is shown on the face of the certificate and to the satisfaction of the person Issuing the license to be in effect at the time B Impoundment Of Dog Without Tag. 1 The poundmaster, under contract to the City, shall capture and impound any dog found within the City limits which is not wearing a valid license tag and rabies tag conforming to the provisions of this Chapter 2 Any officer or employee of the poundmaster, any police officer of the City or of any City In Los Angeles County who is in pursuit of a dog shall have the right to enter upon any private or public property in the City in order to examine or capture any dog thereon or therein which is suspected of being in violation of the provisions of subsection A4 of this Section or Is suspected of being rabid or infected with rabies; provided, however, that no such officer or employee shall have the right to enter a house which is in use as a residence without first having secured a search warrant therefor (Ord 526, 5 -12 -1958) C Release From Impoundment 1 No dog impounded as provided in subsection B of this Section shall be released to any person except where there has been a performance of the following conditions (Ord 510, 9 -30 -1957) a There has been presented to the poundmaster a current license and rabies tag conforming to this Chapter for the dog (Ord 512, 11 -12 -1957) b Where the person keeping, harboring or having the dog is a resident of the City, there has been paid to the poundmaster the license fee for a City dog license as provided by law. c There has been paid to the poundmaster the impounding, collection and other fees as provided by law d There has been paid to the poundmaster a reasonable fee as determined by the poundmaster for ORDINANCE NO AMENDING SSMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 16 0 2 � the vaccination of the dog; provided, however, that the fee shall not exceed five dollars ($5.00), or, there has been shown to the satisfaction of the poundmaster that the dog has been vaccinated with rabies vaccine within the time penods and according to the other requirements as prescribed in subsections At and A2 of this Section, or, that a certificate of disability has been issued for such dog as provided in subsection A4 of this Section e The poundmaster has determined that the dog does not have and Is not reasonably suspected of having rabies (Ord 510, 9 -30 -1957) D Rabies Suspect, Impoundment Procedure If the poundmaster suspects that any dog so Impounded has rabies, he shall hold the dog for inspection by a health officer of the County In the event that the health officer determines that the dog is afflicted with rabies, it shall be disposed of or confined for such time as the health officer directs In the event that the health officer suspects that the dog may develop rabies, it shall be confined for such time as the health officer directs Whenever the health officer determines that the dog does not have rabies, it shall be released In accordance with the provision of subsection C of this Section Ord 510, 9 -30 -1957) 6 3 11 DOG PARK RULES A Hours, Rules Owner's and /or handlers shall be in attendance with dogs during the use of the dog park The dog park shall be open from dawn to dusk, seven (7) days a week. The following rules shall be in force 1 Aggressive dogs are not allowed In the park, 2 No food in the park/don't feed dogs in the park, 3 Owners must supervise and clean up after dogs, 4 Children under twelve (12) years of age must be supervised by an adult, 5 Dogs must be at least four (4) months old and vaccinated, 6 Dogs in heat are not permitted, 7 No spiked collars, ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 17 030 8 No bikes, roller blades, roller skates, strollers or similar items allowed in the park, 9 Owners must have a leash available at all times, 10 Parking regulations must be obeyed, 11 Dog owners are liable for any injuries or damage caused by their dog(s), 12 All dogs must be currently licensed, 13 Professional dog trainers are not allowed to conduct training on site, 14 No person may bring more than three (3) dogs to the park at one time B Prohibited Behavior The following behaviors must be stopped Immediately Prolonged growling, 2 Mounting or pinning of other dogs C Emergency In case of an emergency 911 shall be called (Ord 1 318, 6 -20 -2000) 63 12 INTERFERING WITH ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICERS PROHIBITED A person shall not Interfere with, oppose or resist the poundmaster or any employee of the City, while such person is engaged in the performance of any act authorized by this Title 63 13 INTERFERENCE WITH POLICE DOGS It is unlawful for any person to willfully tease, torment, agitate, provoke, beat, kick, strike, inure, maim, disable, kill, or in any way interfere with any dog being used in a police function by law enforcement officers CHAPTER 4 IMPOUNDMENT OF ANIMALS SECTION 6 4 1 Poundmaster, Duties, Impoundment Fees 6 4 2 Public Pound Created, Expenses ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO IS C31 6 4 3 Animal Impoundment 6 4 4 Reclamation Of Impounded Animals 6 4 5 Impoundment Sale Proceeds 6 4 6 Trespassing Animal Or Fowl 6 4 1 POUNDMASTER, DUTIES, IMPOUNDMENT FEES. A City Contract The City Council may at its discretion at any time hereafter, and from time to time hereafter, and for such period as to the City Council may seem proper, contract with any qualified and responsible person for the furnishing to the City of the public pound referred to in this Chapter and for the performance of all of the duties of poundmaster in connection therewith, as contemplated in this Chapter, including, if the City Council shall so contract, the collection and issuance by the poundmaster of any license under this Chapter In the event the City Council does so contract, then and in that event the contract shall designate the person to act as the poundmaster under this Chapter and also provide for the appointment of his deputies, assistants and successors, if any In the event of the making of the contract, the person so designated or selected, as contemplated in the contract, shall be the poundmaster and the public pound of the City shall in this case be maintained at the place or places indicated in the contract. B Office Created The office of poundmaster of the City is created. The Chief of Police or his or her designee shall serve as poundmaster C Collected Fund Disposition All monies received by the poundmaster as fees and charges of every kind in connection with the licensing, impounding, sale or keeping of any animal or fowl, unless otherwise provided in the contract provided for in this Chapter, shall be paid by him into the City Treasury before twelve o'clock (12 00) noon on the Saturday next succeeding the collection thereof D Entry On Private Premises The poundmaster is authorized to enter upon private premises at any and all reasonable times while engaged in the discharge of his duties under this Chapter for the purposes of enforcing the provisions of this Chapter. E Duties 1 Generally It shall be the duty of the poundmaster to make investigations concerning, to take up, receive into the pound, maintain therein an to release, discharge or dispose of ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 19 032 therefrom, all animals and fowl found running at large upon any public highway, street, avenue, way, lane, alley, park, square, sidewalk or any other public place within the City, or which shall be staked out or fastened in such a manner that they can go or enter into or upon any such public highway, street, avenue, way, lane, alley, park, square, sidewalk or other public place within the City, or which may be delivered to such poundmaster by any person under the provisions of this Chapter, or which may be on private premises within the City, but which are nevertheless subject to impoundment or disposal under the provisions of this Chapter (Ord 431, 1 -27 -1 54) 2 City Dog License Collector The poundmaster is declared the City dog license collector and the poundmaster shall, upon the payment of the license fee as contemplated in Chapter 3 of this Title by any owner or person having control or charge of any dog within the City, deliver to the person an appropriate tag for which the license fee has been paid and shall also deliver to the person a receipt for a sum of money as has been paid as the license fee. (Ord. 982, 12 -18 -1979) 3 Records And Notices The poundmaster shall keep a full, true and correct record of all animals and fowl taken, received and impounded, the date of the impounding and the date and manner of their release, discharge or disposal and except as hereinafter provided shall keep conspicuously posted, at the entrance to the pound, a list of all animals and fowl therein contained, together with a brief description of each of the animals and fowl at all times during which animals and fowl remain in the pound; provided, however, that the notice need not be posted if all animals and fowl within the pound are open to viewing by the public between the hours of ten thirty o'clock (10 30) A M and five o'clock (5 00) P M each day, except Sundays and holidays 4 Care Of Animals And Fowl. The poundmaster shall provide the necessary subsistence and shall properly care for all animals and fowl while in his custody 5 Animal Or Fowl Disposal In addition to any other duties imposed upon the poundmaster by this Chapter, unless otherwise provided in any contract executed under this Chapter, it shall be the duty of the poundmaster to remove and dispose of any and all dead animals or fowl found in or upon any of the public highways, streets, avenues, ways, ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 20 033 lanes, alleys, parks, squares, sidewalks or other public places within the City. The poundmaster shall also have the right to remove and dispose of any abandoned dead animal or fowl found or being upon any private premises, and, also to remove and humanely dispose of any live animal or fowl which, either by reason of age or Infirmity or request of the owner or person having the care, custody or control thereof, is to be destroyed and disposed of within the City, provided, however, that in case of large animals weighing two hundred (200) pounds or more each, and whether live or dead, the poundmaster shall have a claim against the owner of the animal for the actual cost of removal and disposition of the animal and the owner shall be liable to the poundmaster for the amount of the claim (Ord 431, 1 -27 -1954) F Fees For Impounding And Keeping Animals. The poundmaster shall collect from the owner or owners of all animals and fowl impounded, except dogs, the following fees for impounding and keeping the same 1 For every horse, mare, colt, goat, sheep, cow, mule, jack, fenny, ass, bull, ox, steer or calf Impounded by him, the sum of ten dollars ($10 00) as an impounding fee and the further sum of two dollars ($2 00) per day for each day the animal is necessarily held in such pound 2 For all other animals except dogs, not hereinabove specifically mentioned and all fowl impounded in the public pound, the poundmaster shall collect the sum of five dollars ($5 00) as an impounding fee and In addition thereto the sum of one dollar ($1.00) per day for each day the animal or fowl Is necessarily held In the pound (Ord. 938, 6 -21 -1977) G Vaccination Fee, Redemption Of Stray Dogs And Cats. The poundmaster shall collect a three dollar ($3.00) fee from persons redeeming impounded dogs and cats for administering distemper vaccinations to stray dogs and for vaccinating stray cats for feline diseases H Fees And Procedures For Impounding And Keeping Dogs: Upon impounding any dog found running at large, the poundmaster shall immediately prepare a notice containing a brief description of the dog and within twenty four (24) hours thereafter shall deliver to the Chief of Police a copy of such notice ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 21 C 3 1 At any time within five (5) days from the date of the first posting of the notice, the owner or persons entitled to the possession of the dog may reclaim the dog upon payment to the poundmaster of an Impounding fee of seven dollars fifty cents ($7 50), 2 For the second Impoundment of a dog, owned by the same person, the pound fee shall be fifteen dollars ($15 00), 3 For the third impoundment of a dog, owned by the same person, the pound fee shall be twenty five dollars ($25.00), 4 In addition to the foregoing Impounding fee, the sum of two dollars ($2 00) per day for each day or portion thereof for which the dog has been impounded (Ord 71, 6 -19 -1979) 6 4 2 PUBLIC POUND CREATED, EXPENSES A Created, Location A public pound for the City for the Impounding of animals and fowl is authorized and the public pound Is created and established The public pound shall be maintained at such place or places as the City Council may from time to time hereafter by resolution of the City Council determine or as may be designated in any contract for the performance of pound services approved and authorized by the City Council (Ord. 431, 1 -27 -1954) B Expense Of Establishing And Maintaining- All expenses of keeping, maintaining and establishing the public pound, unless otherwise provided for in the contract referred to in subsection 6 4 1A of this Chapter shall be paid by the City All claims therefor, unless provided otherwise in such contract, shall be presented, allowed and paid as other claims against the City are presented, allowed and paid (Ord 733, 1 -26 -1970) 6 4 3 ANIMAL IMPOUNDMENT A Costs Of Subsistence And Care The costs of subsistence or care for impounded animals and fowl shall be a charge against and paid by the City, unless otherwise specified in any contract which may be awarded for the pound service as contemplated in subsection 6 4 1A of this Chapter, in which case the costs thereof shall be paid and discharged as contemplated in the contract B Minimum Period Of Impoundment Every animal and fowl impounded in the public pound shall be kept therein for a full penod of at least five (5) days, exclusive of the day of Impoundment, ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 22 035 unless sooner redeemed by the lawful owner thereof or unless in the opinion of the poundmaster the physical condition of the animal or fowl is such as to justify prior disposition in order to serve humane considerations (Ord. 431, 1 -27 -1954) 6 4 4 RECLAMATION OF IMPOUNDED ANIMALS. A Right To Reclaim Upon Payment Of Charges- The owner or any person entitled to the control of any animal or fowl impounded in the public pound has the right to reclaim the same at any time prior to the sale or other actual disposal thereof, upon payment to the poundmaster of the costs and charges provided for in this Chapter B Payment Of Fees When any redemption is made under this Chapter, in addition to paying any impounding fee or costs incurred by reason of impounding any animal impounded under this Chapter, there shall also be paid the amount of any license fee which may then be due or payable on such animal under this Title or any other section of this Code or ordinance of the City, in case a current license for the animal is not in existence at the time C Damage Payment When any redemption is made under this Chapter, in addition to paying any impounding fee or costs incurred by reason of impounding any animal or fowl, there shall also be paid reasonable demands for actual damage done by any animal or fowl running at large The damages required to be paid by this subsection shall be paid to the person whose property was damaged Ord 431, 1 -27 -1954) 6 4 5 IMPOUNDMENT SALE PROCEEDS Whenever any animal or fowl is sold as provided in and under the provision of this Chapter, the proceeds of the sale shall, unless otherwise provided in any contract made as provided in subsection 6 4.1A of this Chapter, be paid into the City Treasury. (Ord. 431, 1 -27 -1954, amd 2000 Code) 6 4 6 TRESPASSING ANIMAL OR FOWL Any animal or fowl found trespassing upon any private ground or premises within the City may be taken up by the party owning, controlling or having possession of the ground or premises, or by the agent or representative of the person, and committed to the poundmaster to be dealt with as provided in this Chapter. Any person taking up the stray animal or fowl found running at large or trespassing upon any property, ground or premises owned, controlled or in possession of the person shall promptly notify the poundmaster of such taking up and it is unlawful for any such person to fail or refuse to surrender the animal to the poundmaster or his duly authorized representative upon demand (Ord 431, 1 -27 -1954) ORDINANCE NO _ AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 23 V 3 6 SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall become effective at midnight on the thirtieth (30) day from and after the final passage and adoption hereof. SECTION 3 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original ordinances of said City, shall make a not of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted, and shall within 15 days after the passage or adoption thereof cause the same top be published or posted in accordance with the law PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of Mike Gordon, Mayor ATTEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Ordinance No was duly introduced by said City Council at a regular meeting held on the day of , and duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 20TH day of JUNE, 2000, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN NOT PARTICIPATING Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPR VED AS TO FORM - Mark D ensley, City Attorney ORDINANCE NO AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6 ANIMAL CONTROL PAGE NO 24 ,137 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA DESCRIPTION: MEETING DATE- January 16, 2001 AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business Water Well Project Report presentation by RBF RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Discussion andfor possible direction of staff BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION In order to inform the community on the Water Well Project, it was decided that a presentation on the progress of the project be made by RBF, the consultants who are providing technical assistance on this project This presentation, among other facts, will report on the activities completed and on the upcoming activities ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FISCAL IMPACT None Operating Budget* Amount Requested, Account Number, Project Phase. Appropriation Required, No ORIGINATED BY a/ Date: Andres Santamana Director of Public Works JAN 1� REVIEWED BY I-X7 ,L Date: N \COUNCIL 01UANUARY16 08 Mednesday 1 /10101 8 00 A M) 038 3 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE' January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING. COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS & BOARDS AGENDA DESCRIPTION Announce appointments to the Camp Eucalyptus Task Force and set first meeting thereof RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: (1) Announce appointments, (2) Set first meeting of Camp Eucalyptus Task Force BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION. Council authorized the formation of this Task Force on December 5, 2000 for the purpose of making recommendations to the Recreation & Parks Commission regarding the disposition of the Angeles Girl Scout Camp Eucalyptus at 645 California Street ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS N/A FISCAL IMPACT N/A ORIGINATED Julia Abreu- Mason, Executive Assistant Date January 05, 2001 REVIEWED BY Mary Strenn, City Manager Date: January 10, 2001 w I cce_.oi i m o, f aowmma, to C� Eoowvp ss rut Porcr 0 3 J EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Committees, Boards, and Commissions AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Review Recreation and Parks Commission recommendation on proposed Skate Park location RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION. Approve proposed skate park location BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: The Recreation and Parks Commission recently revisited options for a skate park location in El Segundo The Commission consensus was that a park in the vicinity of the Scout House on Grand near Eucalyptus was desirable Staff was directed to meet with representatives of the Scout House Association to discuss a skate park in proximity to their facility Possible locations on the east and west sides of the Scout House were discussed Staff had considered incorporating the existing Teen Center game court and parking area into the Scout House yard to increase available square footage and keep the park in close proximity to the Teen Center During discussions with Scout House representatives, this location received favorable feedback (Continued on reverse side) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Site Plan and Draft Skate Park Proposal FISCAL IMPACT Approximately $150,000 appropriation will be required at a later date Operating Budget Amount Requested Account Number* Project Phase Appropriation Required, 9RIG�NINTEY-.� DATE: January 4, 2001 �J Greg son, Recreation and Parks Director REVIEWED PY DATE January 4 Mary enn, City Manager Yo/ 14 5 Consequently, a meeting was set to discuss the site with representatives of the City Council, Recreation and Parks Commission, Scout House Association, Skate Park Task Force, City Manager, and Recreation and Parks staff The result of this meeting was a decision to recommend this site to the Recreation and Parks Commission and the Scout House Association Board for consideration Both organizations have agreed in concept to recommend this site to the City Council for approval The Scout House Association has requested the use of some open space area west of the Scout House for scout activities previously conducted in the yard on the east side of their building There would need to be some modifications to the terrain in this area to accommodate their needs, and the area would need to be fenced Other issues for consideration include additional enclosed space for meetings and an area for vehicle storage The process needed to proceed with the park development includes • Approval of proposed skate park location, • Consideration of deal points to be presented by Scout House Association sub - committee, • Development and sign -off of Memorandum of Understanding between City Council and Scout House association, • Restructuring of the lease between the two parties, • Staff development and distribution of an RFP for skate park design services, • Hire architect to conducts visioning workshops with local skaters and determine the park design features, • Renderings presented to Recreation and Parks Commission for input and recommendation to City Council, • Design presented to City Council for approval and Council authorizes development of plans and specifications for the skate park, • Council authorizes staff to go out to bid for construction of the park, • Council approves Construction bid, • Groundbreaking ceremony, • Park construction begins, �4i CT? G_ d W c C O cU f" f f �a a Q� o � 'd N C3 L 042 Ow, 0) L) Q . n --I' f" f f �a a Q� o � 'd N C3 L 042 Skate Park Proposal The City wishes to develop a skate park for local citizens on city -owned property between the Teen Center building and the Scout House on Grand Ave south of Recreation Park The Scout House is located on city -owned property, and a portion of the leased property east of the house is being considered for skate park development The Scout House Association has indicated their willingness to relinquish use of this yard area for the purposes of developing a skate park for the community They have requested that the City consider allowing them to level and fence a section of the turf area generally located west of the Scout House between Grand Ave , Eucalyptus Ave and the southern parking lot of Recreation Park The Scout House Association is also considering additional meeting space on the north side of the building This could be accomplished by enclosing the existing loading dock The board is also interested in exploring parking /storage options on the northwest side of the existing building, The Scout House structure is owned by the Scout House Association, and any improvements to the Scout House would be financed by the Association The Scout House Association has appointed a sub - committee to look at potential improvements in order to enhance their participant's experience, and increase security and safety at the Scout House They have indicated a willingness to solicit the services of a professional architect to assist with the layout and design of the improvements they are proposing If the City Council approves the proposed location for the skate park, and agrees in theory the improvements outlined in this report, the Scout House Association will proceed with renderings of the proposed improvements for review by City Staff and the Council After normal reviews have been conducted by the Building and Safety Division of the Community, Economic, and Development Services Department, and upon approval of a final proposal, the Scout House Association will be able to proceed with the agreed upon improvements in and around the existing Scout House Any physical improvements to the Scout House or the adjacent property will require an amendment to the existing lease, which is currently in effect through January, 2010 043 644 /, /� z § ;` § \ � \ � / ` Z ` ° \ -�� |!) !\ . � E!§( t >z !§t { = -\ ,!l� 1§ ! -}4I44 ! (` :; ( ;§ | \)<:, \!\! )\«|, r E ; ! ! = § §\ .!2! , i ; (0E0 ; - � :! \ \\ 644 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER 12/09/2000 THROUGH 12/22/2000 Date 12/11100 12/13/00 12/13/00 12/14/00 12/15/00 12/21100 12/21/00 12/21/00 12/21 /00 12/21/00 12/21/00 12/08- 12/22/00 Payee Amount West Basin IRS Employment Development Health Comp Pitney Bowes Wells Fargo Bank Federal Reserve Bank Federal Reserve Bank Health Comp IRS Employment Development Workers Comp Activity DATE OF RATIFICATION: 01102101 TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE: Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by 828,899 12 17,703 77 3,63436 1,72692 10,000 00 30,000 00 15000 30000 1,22751 187,459 05 38,125 64 23,193 57 1,142,419 94 Deputy Treasurer Ll Date Finance Director , /yl /� ) h-� X60 I Date City Manager e Dates Description H2O Pmt Special Management Pay Special Management Pay Weekly claims 12/8 Postage Machine TPT Golf Course Payroll Emp Savings Bonds Series I Emp Savings Bonds Series EE Weekly claims 12/8 Federal Taxes PR 13 State Taxes PR 13 SCRMA checks issued 1,142,419.94 Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurers Office of the City of El Segundo 045 \;g ,; { )I §!!- - E� § ;§z / \)) §\ )z \,,))E!(([ »^ °ilfE§l,,z�; >i /§!! ;! -�: z -� §;( \(|§§ § | | |4 /E /] § §�) ;;!ulB!# ;); ,! = §E!! ,!§ ; ;,> | \B!■ ;§§> \ - „ - - - - - - - - - -- - ! \ \\ /\ § � \§ / ! / \/ )k /{ ! �k {�k$ !!'! |� |�| $!� |� § { § |ƒ !!!!k � ;!!! � \ § (| \ \/\ 046 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER 12/23/2000 THROUGH 1/512001 Date Payee Amount Description 12/27/00 Wells Fargo Bank 30,000 00 TPT Golf Course Payroll 12127/00 Health Comp 1,70245 Weekly claims 12/22 1/3/01 Health Comp 1,04511 Weekly claims 12129 1/3/01 IRS 186,973 43 Federal Taxes PR 14 1/3/01 Employment Development 34,251 21 State Taxes PR 14 12/23- 1/5/01 Workers Comp Activity 30,873 80 SCRMA checks issued 284,846 00 DATE OF RATIFICATION: 01117/01 TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by 1 Deputy Treasurer /'ti l , //,/a/ �1 Date Finance Director //% � j A/� 00 / Date City Manager Dat6 284,846.00 Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of EI Segundo u4 i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2000 - 5:00 P.M. 5:00 PM Session CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Gordon at 5 00 P.M ROLL CALL Mayor Gordon - Present Mayor ProTem Jacobs - Present Council Member Gaines - Present Council Member McDowell - Present Council Member Wernick - Present MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Gaines to discuss an item that arose after the posting of the Agenda, concerning a California Space Technology Alliance, California Space Infrastructure Program Grant Application, with a deadline of December 21, 2000, for a request for federal funds for help in building a parking structure on the Air Force site MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 MOVED by Council Member Gaines, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to approve of completing the grant application for Federal Funds, to be applied to building a parking structure on the Air Force site This approval does not commit the Council to accepting the funds after approval MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510 CLOSED SESSION- Council moved into closed session at 5 10 P M The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, et seq ) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator, and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel), and /or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as follows- CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a)) 1 City of El Segundo v Bd of Airport Commissioners, et al., LASC Case No BC 220609 2 Hill v El Segundo, USDC No CV 98- 1463- LGB(SHX) 3 Venegas v El Segundo, LASC Case No BC207136 4 Phillips Petroleum, at al v County of Los Angeles, et al , USDC No. 1938 -MRP (MANx). 5 Shell Chemical Company, et al v County of Los Angeles, et al., USDC No. 1917 -GHK (RCx) 6 Jeffrey Capistran v El Segundo, LASC Case No YC 038535 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE NO 1 1 048 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(b): -1- potential case (no further public statement is required at this time), Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c) -2- matters. DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) — None CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957 6) — None. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956 8) — None Council reconvened in Open Session CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Gordon at 7 00 P M INVOCATION - Rev Julie Elkins, The United Methodist Church of El Segundo PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Pro Tern Sandra Jacobs PRESENTATIONS (a) Richmond Street School Choir (b) Sister City Fire Officials accepted surplus Fire Engine 35 on behalf of the Guaymas Fire Department ROLL CALL Mayor Gordon - Present Mayor ProTem Jacobs - Present Council Member Gaines - Present Council Member McDowell - Present Council Member Wernick - Present PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250 While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda The Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed Sandra Mason, resident, requested clarification on Consent Items 11 and 21. Phil Allen, resident, spoke regarding a traffic safety problem at Main Street and Maple Avenue. Mrs Allen, resident, spoke regarding a traffic safety problem at Main Street and Maple Avenue. Liz Garnholz, resident, spoke on the downtown specific plan update MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19. 2000 PAGE NO 2 049 Sandra Mason, resident, spoke regarding traffic problems on Holly Avenue Frank Wong, resident, spoke regarding General Fund expenditures and traffic problems Mayor Gordon stated that at the February 6, 2001 Council meeting there would be an LAX Master Plan update A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Wernick to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS - Notice of Cancellation of previously noticed public hearing on the update to the Circulation Element of the General Plan (Environmental Assessment No 454) No public testimony will be taken Mayor Gordon announced the cancellation of the public hearing regarding the update to the Circulation Element of the General Plan A re- notice of the Hearing will be determined at a later date 2 Resolution reciting the fact of the Special Municipal Election consolidated with the National Presidential Election held November 7, 2000 City Manager Mary Strenn gave a report City Attorney Mark Hensley read the following RESOLUTION NO. 4201 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIOL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFONRIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL HELD ON NOVEMBER 7, 2000, DECLARING THE RUSULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW. MOVED by Council Member Wernick, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to adopt Resolution No 4201, reciting the fact of the Special Municipal Election held on November 7, 2000, declaring the results MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE NO 3 050 C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS — 3 Update on the Implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan. Jim Hansen, Director of Community, Economic and Development Services, gave a report D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - 4 Positions on Committees, Commissions and Boards (GCBs) that will expire in the year 2001. Council directed Staff to open the recruitment process for the positions on the CCBs, as listed, begmnrng January 2001 5 Senior Housing Board's report on Park Vista's 2001 Budget Mr Peter Freeman gave a presentation MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Wemick to approve the Park Vista 2001 budget MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510 6 Review development plans for Washington Park Extension Greg Johnson, Director of Recreation and Parks gave a report Bob Takata, Takata Associates, made a presentation Consensus of Council to have Traffic Committee look at the increased foot traffic on Mariposa Avenue as a result of the Park extension MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Wernick to approve the design plan and authorize architect to commence with plans and specifications and return to Council with a plan for a phased project in April 2001. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 E. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously If a call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business 7 Warrant Numbers 2514361 - 2514651 on Register No. 5 in total amount of $966,560 34, and Wire Transfers in the amount of $382,678 27 Approve Warrant Demand Register and Authorize staff to release Ratify Payroll and Employee Benefit checks, checks released early due to contracts or agreements, emergency disbursements and /or adjustments, and wire transfers from 11/23/00 to 12/08/00 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE NO 4 (t51 8 Approved City Council meeting minutes of December 5, 2000. 9 Received and filed the Status Report on the recent organizational audit of the Department of Public Works 10 Authorized staff to solicit request for proposals from landscape /park development design specialists to provide plans and specifications for the Sycamore Park Irrigation System Replacement Project. (No fiscal Impact as this time). 11 ITEM PULLED BY MAYOR GORDON AT THE REQUEST OF RESIDENT 12 ITEM PULLED - POTENTIAL CONFLICT BY MAYOR PRO TEM JACOBS 13 ITEM HELD OVER TO JANUARY 16TH, 2001 MEETING 14 ITEM PULLED - POTENTIAL CONFLICT BY COUNCIL MEMBER MCDOWELL 15 Adopted the plans and specifications for the Installation of two banner poles on Sepulveda Boulevard approximately 150 feet north of Holly Avenue (estimated cost $50,000), and authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids 16 Approved Amendment No 1 to Employment Agreement between the City of El Segundo and Mary Strenn (Contract No. 2630), and authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment on behalf of the City 17 PULLED BY COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES 18 Authorized staff to purchase two pick -up trucks as replacements for two sedans (unit #3306 and 3307) Fiscal Impact $49,000 19 Approved Agreement No 2849 between Team One Advertising Agency and the City of El Segundo for services related to the planning, execution and placement of advertising for the City's overall economic development effort and for targeted businesses 20 Approved the retirement of police service dog Dako and authorize sale of Dako to his K -9 handler, Officer Garcia, for the nominal fee of one dollar ($1.00) 21 ITEM PULLED BY MAYOR GORDON AT THE REQUEST OF RESIDENT MOVED by Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to approve Consent Agenda Items 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 18, 19, and 20 MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE NO 5 C52 CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA 11 Adopt the program, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program for Federal fiscal year 2000 -2001 projects utilizing Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funds. MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Gaines to adopt the program, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program for Federal fiscal year 2000 -2001 protects utilizing Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funds. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 12 Approve Contract Amendment No 1 to the City- Pavement Coatings Company Contract No 2818 for slurry sealing and temporary re- striping of Main Street in con /unction with the Downtown Specific Plan Improvements (estimated amount = $56,746.92). MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Gaines to approve Contract Amendment No 1 to the City- Pavement Coatings Company Contract No. 2818 for slurry sealing and temporary re- striping of Main Street in con /unction with the Downtown Specific Plan Improvements MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0 MAYOR PRO TEM JACOBS NOT PARTICIPATING DUE TO A POSSIBLE CONFLICT. 14 Adopt plans and specifications for the installation of sidewalks on the north side of Holly Avenue between Maryland Street and Bungalow Drive — Specifications No PW 00 -16 (estimated cost = $20,000), and authorize staff to advertise the protect for receipt of construction bids MOVED by Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs, SECONDED by Council Member Wemick to approve Contract Amendment No 1 to the City- Pavement Coatings Company Contract No. 2818 for slurry sealing and temporary re- striping of Main Street in conjunction with the Downtown Specific Plan Improvements MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 410 COUNCIL MEMBER MCDOWELL NOT PARTICIPATING DUE TO A POSSIBLE CONFLICT. 17 Approve the Request for Proposals from Document Imaging and Records Management Vendors for a four -phase project, and Authorize staff to solicit proposals from qualified vendors MOVED by Council Member Gaines, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to approve the Request for Proposals from Document Imaging and Records Management Vendors for a four - phase project, and Authorize staff to solicit proposals from qualified vendors. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510 21 Letter to Los Angeles Air Force Base MOVED by Council Member Gaines, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to approve for submittal the letter to Los Angeles Air Force Base MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE NO 6 53 F. NEW BUSINESS — 22 Ordinance No. 1320, which established storm water and urban runoff pollution prevention controls, requires modification to meet the recently approved Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements (No fiscal Impact) City Attorney Mark Hensley read the following ORDINANCE NO. 1329 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDOM CALIFORNIA, IMPLEMENTING THE STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN OF THE CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD FOR THE LOS ANGELES REGION BY AMENDING THE EL SEGUNO MUNICIPAL CODE TO REPEAL CHAPTER 6.28 AND ENACT A NEW CHAPTER 6128, "STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION'. Mayor Pro Tem Jacobs introduced the Ordinance G. REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - NONE H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY - NONE I. REPORTS - CITY CLERK - NONE J REPORTS - CITY TREASURER - NONE K. REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS - Council Member McDowell - Wished everyone a happy holiday - Council Member Gaines - Reported on electrical power situation - Council Member Wernick - Reported on LAX Advisory Committee meeting. - Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs - Wished everyone in the community a very happy holiday season Mayor Gordon - 23 Request for variances from the Municipal Code a) Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and waiver of regulations In ESMC Section 20 74 040, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE NO 7 C 5 4 b) The use of air rights and waiver of the Santa Monica Radial 160 R procedure (FAA should be contacted); c) Waiver of the ordinance on Animal Regulations (ESMC 8.02.010); d) Waiver of the Trespass Ordinance (ESMC 9.28.010) including 8.04 110 dealing with trespassing animals, e) Grant a free business license for a non - profit organization (ESMC 5.04.050), f) Waiver of the Pooper - Scooper regulations (ESMC 9.04.040), g) Waiver of the Noise Ordinance to permit the sound of bells (ESC 9.06 0110); and h) Waiver of ESMC 16 04 060 (Driveway Permits Required) and 10.28 110 (Parking on Grades) MOVED by Council Member Wernick, SECONDED by Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs to approve the request by Mr S Clause for December 24 -25, 2000 MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 Mayor Gordon also thanked the community and his family for their continued support PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals, who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250 While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda The Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed Liz Garnholz, resident, spoke on the downtown revitalization plan and the briefing on LAX expansion Sandra Mason, resident, spoke regarding Washington Street Park and Consent Agenda Item 11 Frank Wong, resident, spoke regarding the upcoming briefing on LAX expansion Mary Strenn, City Manager, and Jim Hansen, Director Community, Economic and Development Services, responded to questions on the downtown revitalization plan. Mayor Gordon noted that the meeting of January 2, 2001 was cancelled MEMORIALS - Adjournment in memory of Jim Watson. ADJOURNMENT - at 8 35 p m Cathy Domann, Deputy City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE NO 8 55 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING Consent AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Request by Andrea Dahm, on behalf of El Segundo Little League, for City approval to close certain City streets for its annual opening day parade from 9 00 a m to 11.00 a.m on Saturday, March 3, 2001 (Fiscal impact $460) RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Approve request, provided the event meets all applicable City requirements BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION* For several years, the El Segundo Little League has held an Opening Day Parade The route chosen includes the streets from Eucalyptus and Grand west to Main Street, north on Main to Pine, and then east to Sheldon City support will include three motor officers, compensated at time and one -half overtime rate, and two cadets, compensated at straight time, from the Police Department Sign posting and traffic delineator delivery will occur during the workweek by the Street Department and no crew will be required the day of the event The Little League will distribute and collect the delineators the day of the event under Police Department supervision As in the past, the FY 2000 -2001 budget has included provision for City expenses in connection with this event ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Letter dated December 28, 2000 from Andrea Dahm FISCAL IMPACT $460 00 Operating Budget Amount Requested Account Number: Project Phase Appropriation Required Yes _ No X ORIGINATED DATE. January 10, 2001 Marlene Baker, Executive Assistant REVIEWED BY' DATE. January 10, 2001 Mary Str n, City Manager n„ n „jfk<� L,r, c�azoc 0 5 6 8 Andrea Dahm Ceremonies Coordinator El Segundo Little League PO Box 112 El Segundo, CA 90245 (310) 322 -8883 / (310) 640 -3373 December 28, 2000 A ECEIvI DEC 2 8 a CITY MANAGERS W C1 To the Honorable Maeor Mike Gordon and the El Segundo City Council Members, Th„ is a request to he put on the agenda for the next City council meeting. The El Segundo Little League needs your approval for opening day ceremonies on March 3, 2001 To taahtate the opening day parade u e request that the following streets be blocked off from 9 00 am to 11 00 am The streets are From Eucahptus and Grand Ave West to Main St , North on Main St to Pine Ave then East to Sheldon St Please conracr me if WU have am questnom and to let me know when we are to be present for a city council meearn, S IIccreh, i \ni Dahm (� 5 7 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE- January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION. A resolution of the City Council of the City of El Segundo adopting a schedule of fees for work or encroachment in the public right -of -way (no fiscal impact). RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Adopt resolution BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION. Chapter 12 04 of the City Municipal Code stipulates that "a permit shall be required for any work or encroachment in the public right -of -way, and the permittee shall pay to the City a permit fee, a fee for subdivision plan checks, or Underground Service Alert (USA), as applicable" The Municipal Code further provides for these fees to be established by City Council from time to time by resolution The current fee schedule was established by previous City Council Resolutions 3574 (adopted on January 3, 1989) and 3578 (adopted on January 17, 1989) (Please see the attachment for additional discussion) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Additional discussion 2 Resolution for adoption 3 Previous fee Resolutions 3574 and 3578 FISCAL IMPACT. None Operating Budget: Amount Requested Account Number Project Phase Appropriation Required. No ORIG REVIEWED BY 61W-4" Date: JAN 8 2001 Date. L/ 2�0 PW- COUNCIL 01WANUARY16 11 (Friday 1/5/01 200 P M ) 058 ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION Fiscal Impact: In a typical year, the Public Works Department issues approximately 100 permits for private work in the public right -of -way and receives an average revenue of approximately $15,000 /year for permit and inspection costs The proposed fee program is not intended for additional revenue generation, but rather represents a more simplified and customer friendly method of calculating the fees to reasonably recover City costs to provide the service In the proposed program, inspection fees are based on the amount of work for which a permit is requested The actual time expended to complete a particular improvement may vary from permit to permit, however the proposed fee program is based on an average amount of effort expended by City staff for a particular work category There is no fiscal impact from the implementation of this program Current Program: The current program provides for a three -tier permit structure depending on the development being (a) commercial exceeding 15,000 square feet, (b) commercial equal to or less than 15,000 square feet and multi - family buildings more than six (6) units and, (c) residential single family and multi - family six (6) units or less. At the time of issuing the permit, an inspection and security deposit is charged to the applicant At the completion of the permitted work, the City's actual costs (based on staff inspection time expended on the project) are calculated and any remaining funds from the collected deposit are returned to the applicant Disadvantages of the Current Program: (a) The contractor and the property owner do not know the inspection costs at the time the permit is issued (b) The contractor, at the time of permit issuance, pays an inspection deposit and sometimes may include this deposit in the price to do the property owner's work At the completion of work, unused inspection funds are returned to the contractor and the contractor has the opportunity to keep the returned funds rather than returning them to the property owner (c) The current program involves considerable staff time to keep track of time spent on each permit fob, calculate the refund amount, and to process the refunding of the deposit (d) The current three -tier fee structure is confusing to contractors and property owners PW- COUNCILIJANUARY16 06 (Fnday 1 /5/01 900 AM) Proposed Program Permit Issuance Fee: The purpose of this fee is to recover the cost of issuing the permit, including staff time for verification of insurance documents, simple counter plan checks, discussions with the applicant, collecting and processing the fee payment and final close out of the permit Currently, the permit fee is $140 (commercial more than 15,000 square feet), $90 (commercial $15,000 square feet or less, multi -family more than six (6) units) and $50 (residential single family multi -family six (6) units or less) The estimated staff time for issuing a permit is an average total of 1 5 hours for residential work and four (4) hours for non - residential / commercial work Recommended permit issuance fee for residential development would be $501 permit and for commercial (non - residential) development would be $140 / permit Inspection Fee: The purpose of this fee is to recover the costs for providing field inspection and work monitoring services to verify compliance of the construction work with City standards and requirements Currently, an inspection deposit is collected at the time of permit issuance. During inspection, the inspector keeps track of actual time spent on the lob At the end of the permitted work, the City's actual costs for staff time and equipment changes are calculated and charged to the deposit Any unused funds are returned to the permittee The proposed method of charging the inspection fee is based on the quantities and scope of the proposed work regardless of the nature of development. With this method, a fixed amount is collected at the time of permit issuance and the time keeping and deposit refund chores are eliminated Also, the permittee and the property owner know the exact inspection cost at the time of application (a) Sidewalk and Street Curb /Curb and Gutter: Regardless of the quantity of work, a minimum of three (3) separate inspection visits are necessary for each improvement at one -half hour per visit representing a total staff cost of $85 00 A typical residential property with a 50' wide street frontage would be charged an inspection fee of $85 for construction of each of these improvements abutting the property Recommended inspection fees Sidewalk = $1 00 per LF with a minimum $85.00 per location Curb, Curb and Gutter = $1 00 per LF with a minimum $85 00 per location 3 PW -0OUNCILUANUARVIB O6 (Fnday 1/5101 9 DO AM) 060 (b) Driveway: Regardless of the width, driveway work involves separate steps in constructing the depressed street curb, driveway apron and street pavement patching. A total of three (3) separate inspection visits, at one -half hour per visit, representing a total staff time of one and one -half hours at a cost of $85.00 is estimated for this work, if the work does not include construction of a depressed curb. An additional one (1) hour of inspection is estimated for work that includes construction of a depressed curb in conjunction with the driveway work Recommended inspection fee for driveway work (without a depressed curb) _ $85.00 /each driveway Recommended inspection fee for driveway work (with a depressed curb) _ $140 00 / each driveway (c) House Sewer Lateral Connection to an Existing Sewer Main in Street: The inspection work involves three (3) separate inspection visits of one (1) hour each for construction of the sewer connection and two (2) separate additional inspections of one -half hour each for inspecting the compaction of trench and restoration of street pavement, representing a total staff time of four (4) hours at a cost of $225 00 Recommended inspection fee for house sewer lateral connection to an existing City sewer main would be $225 00 for each connection. (d) House Sewer Connection to Existing Sewer Lateral: The inspection work involves two (2) separate inspections of one (1) hour each for making a new house sewer connection to an existing lateral and an additional one half (1/2) hour of inspection for associated pavement inspection, representing a total staff cost of $145 00 Recommended inspection fee for house sewer connection to an existing sewer lateral would be $145 00 for each connection (e) Temporary Encroachment: Temporary encroachment permits for up to thirty (30) days upon the public right - of -way are required for placement of trash dumpsters on the street abutting a construction site, storage of materials and /or equipment, and partial blocking of streets to accommodate heavy construction. This category will also include property owner improvements on the public parkway and other miscellaneous encroachments on the public street right -of -way The inspection work involves periodical checking of the encroachment to verify if the area is secure with barricades and at the end of encroachment to verify that the area has been cleaned up Encroachment permits are valid for thirty (30) PW- COUNCILUANUARY16 o6 (Fnday 115/01 9 00 A M) 061 days and for a total of two (2) hours of staff inspection effort, representing $115 00 per encroachment are typically expended Recommended inspection fee- $115.00 / encroachment (f) Underground Service Alert (USA): State law (Assembly Bill No 73) requires local agencies to locate and mark underground installations upon notification by an excavator. This law also provides for the local agency to charge a fee to recover its costs to provide this service For El Segundo, the underground installations to be located and marked upon USA notification are the City's storm drain, sewer and water mains The City's cost to provide this service is different for spot excavations and for long trench excavations, such as utility trenches Typically, approximately one (1) hour of staff time is expended for a single spot excavation, or to provide the service for a trench 100 feet long At an estimated cost of $50 per every 100 feet the cost of this service translates to 0 50 /LF Recommended USA fee $0 50 / one LF of trench with a minimum $50 00 per location (g) Subdivision Plan Checks: The current fee structure provides for $245 (commercial more than 15,000 square feet), $150 (commercial 15,000 square feet or less, multi- family more than six (6) units) and $80 (single family multi -family six (6) units or less), based on the three -tier permit fee structure The staff time expended for these plan checks is the same regardless of the nature of development Furthermore, the current fee structure needs to separately address plan checking of parcel maps and tract maps, and off -site improvement plans which require different amounts of staff effort (i) Parcel Maps and Tract Maas: Under an agreement with the City, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works performs plan checks to verify the mathematical accuracy and technical compliance of the map. The developer pays a fee for this service directly to the County The Public Works Department reviews these maps, obtains all needed City signatures and City Council approval as needed. The staff time typically expended for this effort is two (2) hours representing $70 00 Recommended fee for processing parcel maps and tract maps $70 00 / map PW- COUNCILQANUARY16 06 (Fnday 115101 9 00 A M ) 062 (ii) Off -site Improvement Plan Checks: Some developments are required to design and install improvements in the public right -of -way as a condition of approval of the development The engineering plan check effort involved prior to issuing the construction permit is estimated to average approximately two (2) hours per sheet of design plans which includes one (1) field visit to the fob site, representing $7000 Recommended fee for off -site improvement plan checks: $7000/ sheet of plans relative to work in the public right -of -way. (h) Work by Public Utility Companies: The current program includes permit fee and inspection charges to public utility companies (Southern California Edison, Gas and Telephone Companies, fiber optics conduit installation, oil company pipelines, etc.) equal to those charged to developer's work in the public right -of -way This program further provides an option for public utility companies to obtain an "annual permit" for $2,000 to perform routine maintenance and testing work without obtaining a separate permit for each instance The inspection charges for this work is invoiced annually to the utility company A separate permit is required from the utility companies for installation of a new facility or major modifications to an existing facility The City's cost to provide this service is directly related to the length of the trenching proposed by the utility company with a minimum cost to inspect spot excavations Typically, approximately one (1) hour of staff time is expended for every localized spot excavation up to a length of 100 feet. Recommended fee for utility cuts Individual permit fee = $ 140 Permit fee - annual permit fee = $2,000 Inspection fee = $0 50 /LF of trench with a minimum $50.00 per location Advantages of the Proposed Program: (a) The inspection costs are estimated at the time the permit is issued based on the quantity of work permitted rather than the staff time expended for inspection The contractor and the property owner know the exact inspection costs when the permit is issued M- COUNOWANUARV7606 (Fn6ay V5101 BOO 0.M) 063 (b) The potential for the contractor to keep the refunded inspection deposit funds is eliminated (c) The proposed program will result in a more efficient use of staff time to administer the program (d) The proposed program eliminates the three -tier permit structure resulting in a simpler and more customer friendly process. Comparison with Neicihborina Cities: A review of the Public Works fee program in neighboring Cities indicated that every City had its own method of evaluating and assessing the permit and inspection fees, and therefore an accurate comparison was not available. However, the fees proposed by staff are generally in line with fees charged by neighboring Cities and is based on reasonable staff effort needed to provide the service for like items of work. PW- COUNCILUANUARY16 06 (Fnday 1/6/01 B 00 A M) G64 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR WORK OR ENCROACHMENT IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY WHEREAS, the City Municipal Code Chapter 12 04 stipulates that a permit shall be required for any work or encroachment In the public right -of -way and that the permittee shall pay a fee for the permit, subdivision plan checks, or Underground Service Alert (USA) fee as applicable, and WHEREAS, the City Municipal Code Chapter 12 04 further provides for the City Council to establish the above fees from time to time by resolution, and WHEREAS, the attached Schedule of Fees is recommended to the City Council to recover City costs for Issuance of the permit and for Inspecting the work or encroachment in the public right -of -way NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS- SECTION 1. The Schedule of Fees established by Resolutions 3574 and 3578 relating to work or encroachment in the public right -of -way is hereby rescinded SECTION 2 The Schedule of Fees referred hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A ", is hereby approved and adopted as the Schedule of Fees for work or encroachment in the public right -of -way SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, shall enter the same In the book of original resolutions of said City, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2000 Mike Gordon, Mayor ATTEST. of the City of El Segundo, California Cindy Mortesen City Clerk (SEAL) A� PPRO S TO FORM. Mark D Hensley City Attorney RESOLUTION NO SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR WORK OR ENCROACHMENT IN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY PAGE NO 1 065 EXHIBIT "A" (to Resolution No ) Schedule of Fees for Work or Encroachment in the Public Right -of -Way I. Permit Issuance Fee $50 per permit - residential $140 per permit - non - residential / commercial II Inspection Fee (a) Sidewalk $1-00 per linear foot with a minimum of $85 00 per location (b) Street Curb /Curb and Gutter $1 00 per linear foot with a minimum of $85 00 per location (c) Dnvewav $ 85 00 per driveway without a depressed curb $140 00 per driveway with a depressed curb (d) House Sewer Lateral Connection to Existina City Sewer Main $225 00 per connection (e) House Sewer Connection to Existina Sewer Lateral $145 00 per connection (f) Temporary Encroachment $115 00 per encroachment (g) Underground Service Alert (USA) $0 50 / LF of excavation or trench with a minimum $50 00 II Subdivision Plan Checks (a) Parcel Maps I Tract Maps $70 00 / per map (b) Off -site Improvement Design Plans $70 00 per sheet of design plans relative to work in the public right -of -way III Utility Cuts Individual Permit = $140 / permit Annual permit for routine maintenance work = $2000 / year Inspection fee = $0 50 / LF of trench length with a minimum $50 00 per location NRESOSIEXHIBIT -AFEE (12n2100) '16 RESOLUTION NO. 3574 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CAL1FOPN- -A, ADOPTING SCHEDULES OF FEES FOR WORK 1N THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF FAY, AND FOR APPLICATION AND PROCESSING OF BUILDING, PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL PERMITS, PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS, AND ZONING FEES. WHEREAS, City Council Ordinance No. 1130, adopted January '3, 1999 establishes that all fees for work in the public right of way, and for application and processing of building, plumoing, and -eohanical permits, plats anc subdivisions, and zoning fees be fixed and established by City Council from tine to time by resolution; and W�iEREAS, the attached Scheoules of Fees are recommended to the City Council to cover costs and work done in the public right of ..ay, and for application and processing of building, plumbing, and recnanical permits, plats and subdivisions, and zoning fees. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: sECTION 1. The Sched,,.:es of Fees, referred hereto and made a part nereof as Exhibits A, B, C, D and E are hereby approved and acopted as the Schedules of Fees for work in the public right of -ay, and for application and c_ocessing of building, plumbing, and -_c,anical permits, plats and subdivisions, and zoning fees. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the effective date of Ordinance No 130. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said city; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the record of the proceedings of the City Council of said city, in the minutes of the meeting at wnich the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on January 1989.,/ Mayor of the CIty of El Segundo, California ATTEST•' �� _� City Cler (SEAL) 067 Ln ^ NE L .o u\ ro o L N u rJ G a wI =1� �I N Y >r ro E d a Iy I J - G C L O O. u R C) U d O 0 q 0 c > O 3 i 1 Y [ W L ro p o U L L R C) 0 0 0 �+ L C U N J C U - U - 7 ✓: I Of U y L CL C L E N O R L L C••+L d d W U dL CD H y v U ++ Nt d a + N .+ m taLa 7 O V y 1.1 ro U j -: C J U N U y + � U L ro C ro x ro m L U J ;J L •+ N ro x U N . y rz L 7 C ro L V f� G = + U Y � L r O 3 3 1 w W aJ L p a oe r _ C J 7 U ry U ro U U p O n L r U N U J i L = rn ••+ O V G 41 L d L L d O d v_ [s. try 0 N H V) Q N 0 O C N O U 0 O N d " N > U 0 C U ro S 7 9L w vlGm [ L O d � Lu ro G7 O [LL J O In r-+ un N N m b � c o 7 C7 •-+ O U O L • . t7 > e L L p CD to � ry C --I L U G d L U] .-1 VI =Gw y [ W R L+ JJ L O N C U 4. td O ra O O N ro N ro N O N U ••+ ro_GW O d m EQ p > > N.• N u R r•1 O V C M w L ro N d L 7 fT .^1 W -r .r ro N E C C roar,. N rt y ,....• 1 lD N _ 7 7 L 6 Ij ✓; 3 -� f 3 0 L I^ r N ro r^ C N O LO 1- I^ U... � IBC C L - rFr I I L U1 O Iy I J - G C L O O. u R C) U d O 0 q 0 c > O 3 i 1 Y [ W L ro p o U L L R C) 0 0 0 �+ L C U N J C U - U - 7 ✓: I Of U y L CL C L E N O R L L C••+L d d W U dL CD H y v U ++ Nt d a + N .+ m taLa 7 O V y 1.1 ro U j -: C J U N U y + � U L ro C ro x ro m L U J ;J L •+ N ro x U N . y rz L 7 C ro L V f� G = + U Y � L r O 3 3 1 w W aJ L p a oe r _ C J 7 U ry U ro U U p O n L r U N U J i L = rn ••+ O V G 41 L d L L d O d v_ [s. try 0 N H V) Q N 0 O C N O U 0 O N d " N > U 0 C U ro S 7 9L w vlGm [ L O d � Lu ro G7 O [LL J O In r-+ un N N m b � c o 7 C7 •-+ O U O L • . t7 > e L L p CD to � ry C --I L U G d L U] .-1 VI =Gw y [ W R L+ JJ L O N C U 4. td O ra O O N ro N ro N O N U ••+ ro_GW O d m EQ p > > N.• N u R r•1 O V C M w L ro N d L 7 fT .^1 W -r .r It RESOLUTION No. 3578 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF i9E CITY OF E1 SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING SCHEDULE OF °EES FOR WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY BY PUBLIC L::L:TY COMPANIES. WHEREAS, the City Council on January 3, 1989 adopted Resolution No. 3574 establishing schedules of fees for work in the public right -of -way, and for application and processing of building, plumbing and mechanical permits, plats and suod.visions, and zoning fees; and WHEREAS. the City Council recognizes that some work done b, n_o_ic Utility Companies is not applicable to the fee scned�ie established by Resolution r:o. 3574 and that a separate fee schedule is necessary for routine maintenance and operations work and for work not applicable to the fee schedule established by Resolution No. 3574 performed by the utility companies; and WHEREAS, City Council Ordinance No. 1130. adopted January 3, 1989 establishes that all fees for work in the public right -of- way, and for application and processing of building, plumbing, and mechanical permits, plats and subdivisions, and zoning fees be f.xed and established by City Council from time to time by resolution, and WHEREAS, the attached Schedule of Fees is recommended to the City Council to cover application and processing costs for work done in the public right -of -way by the Public Utility Companies. hOW, THERE-ORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, Zk- :'ORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SE C::ON 1. The Schedule of Fees, referred hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A -1 is hereby approved and adopted as the Scned -le of 'ees for work in the public right -of -way by the Public ut-Ltv Companies. SE 7:ON 3. This resolution shall become effective on the �f.°ective date of Ordinance No. 1130. SE=10N 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said city; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the record of the proceedings of the City Council of said city, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 17th day of gnua989 w � Mayor o the City--o E1 Segundo, California 1 I AT'ti 5- City Clerc Exhibit A -1 Schedule of Fees for Work Done In the Public Rioht —of —Way by Public Utility Companies 1. Fees for new installations in development shall be charged Resolution No. 3574. connection with existing or new as established by City Council 2. An annual blanket permit may be issued for performing routine maintenance and operations such as potholing, drilling and filling of bar holes for leak inspections, repair and /or replacement of existing underground facilities that do not result in a change in the alignment on size of the facilities and emergency work. The annual blanket permit fee shall be $2,000.00. Inspection Fee: 3. Fees for new installations facilities which result in facilities, when such work developments identified in Council Resolution No. 357 follows: Actual Direct Labor Cost x 1.8 + vehicle charges or for replacement of existing a change in the alignment or size of the is not performed in connection with the fee schedule established by City 4, for each location, shall be as Perrit 'Fee: $90 I- spection Fee: Actual Direct Labor Cost x 1.8 + vehicle charges U.S.A. Underground Alert Fee (:f applicable ): $15 4. At the option of the Public Utility Company, wort. Parn+rted under the annual blanket permit procedure may be performed individually by paying the fees establishes? under :tent 3 of this schedule. 070 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING:COnsent Calendar AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Agreement for Professional Services between Moreland & Associates, Inc and the City of El Segundo to provide accounting services during a staff leave of absence in the Accounting Division of the Finance Department RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Approve Agreement for Professional Services between Moreland & Associates, Inc and the City of El Segundo BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION Due to a staff leave of absence, temporary professional accounting services are required from December 13, 2000 to April 6, 2001 in the Accounting Division of the Finance Department Ms Marian Alter is an employee of Moreland & Associates, Inc and is currently performing the accounting services at a satisfactory level ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Exhibit A Scope of Services between Moreland & Associates, Inc and the City of El Segundo FISCAL IMPACT Not to Exceed $20,000 Operating Budget $20,000 Amount Requested, $20,000 Account Number 001 -400- 2502 - 6214,001- 400 - 2502 -4201 Project Phase Approval of Agreement Appropriation required No Tim Walker, Accounting Manager Bret Plumlee, Director of Finance uary a, zuui DATE January n, City Manager ��/ 071 1/8/01 1 51 PM 1 O EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS December 12, 2000 Mr Jim Walker Accounting Manager City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 Dear Mr Walker 1201 DOVE STREET SUITE 660 NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA 92660 (969) 221-0025 570 RANCHEROS DRIVE SUITE 260 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 (760) 7523390 In accordance with your request, we are providing this letter of understanding regarding the accounting services to be provided by Moreland & Associates, Inc to the City of El Segundo We will provide the services of Ms Marian Alter to serve as your Senior Accountant starting December 13, 2000 and lasting through April 2001 You believe you will require the services of Ms Alter three days each week I have previously informed you that she will not be available the week of February 12`h I am also informing you she will not be available the week of December 25th due to prior commitments It should be understood that during the performance of these services Ms Alter shall at all times be an independent contractor who is covered by our Workers' Compensation insurance At any time during the performance of these services, you will be able to terminate these services for any reason including dissatisfaction with the services provided. We ask that you provide us with two weeks notice before the services are terminated or a significant change is made in the level of service You may extend these services by our mutual agreement The fee for the services of Ms Alter will be at the rate of $55 per hour Our services will be billed on approximately the first day of the month for services provided during the prior month Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services Please call at your convenience if you have any questions Kindly acknowledge that our understanding of this engagement is accurate by signing and returning one copy of this letter for our files Very truly yours ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO MORELAND & ASSOCIATES, INC By_ Michael C Moreland, Partner Date t 1, 072 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Municipal Area Express (MAX) Capital Reserve MOU Amendment RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION. Adopt and Execute the MAX Capital Reserve MOU Amendment BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: The MAX Policy Steering Committee approved the amendment to the Capital Reserve MOU at their December 4, 2000 meeting Under the MAX guidelines, the member agencies are required to adopt and execute the agreement (attached) The amendment adds a fourth year to the original three year agreement The purpose of the original capital reserve account was to finance the local share of the cost to replace the MAX fleet of 14 buses in the year 2001 The member agency contribution schedule is included as Attachment A The amended MOU will extend the period of the capital reserve fund from three to four years in order to increase the local share from $690,900 to $921,200 for the replacement of the fleet in year 2002 This extension was necessary in order to accumulate sufficient funds to replace all fourteen buses ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Lead Agency (Torrance) Staff report to MAX Policy Steering Committee, Amendment to MOU for Prop A &C Local Return Capital Reserve MAX, Duplicate original of MOU for Prop A &C Local Return Capital Reserve MAX FISCAL IMPACT- Fiscal Year 2001/2002 Operating Budget: Amount Requested* Account Number Project Phase. Appropriation Required• $ 41,300 $ 19,729 112 - 400 - 5298 -8104 Yes Greg 4ffson, Recreation and Parks Director Mary Strefin, City Manager DATE DATE January 2, 2001 7 ®f 1I v7S ITEM 3C November 27, 2000 TO: MAX Policy Steering Committee December 4, 2000 Meeting FROM: Lead Agency Staff SUBJECT: Amendment to MOU for Proposition A & C Local Return Capital Reserve for the Municipal Area Express (MAX) RECOMMENDATION The Staff Task Force recommends that the Policy Steering Committee adopt the Amended Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between MAX and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) for the Prop A & C Local Return Capital Reserve BACKGROUND In July 1998, an MOU between MAX and the MTA was executed to establish a three -year Prop A & C Local Return Capital Reserve fund for the purpose of establishing a capital reserve interest - bearing fund in the amount of $690,900 in Prop A & C Local Return funds that would finance the local share of the cost of replacing the MAX fleet of 14 buses in the year 2001 The Amended MOU will extend the period of the capital reserve fund from three to four years for the purpose of aggregating the necessary local share of $921,200 for the replacement of MAX buses in the year 2002 ANALYSIS The original MOU executed in July 1998 established a three -year capital reserve fund for the purchase of MAX replacement buses The capital reserve fund began on July 1, 1998, and funds were to be expended by July 1, 2001, or the funds would lapse unless prior to the lapsing date, the MTA approved to extend the term of the reserve Due to policy set forth by the MTA Board of Directors, the MTA may only execute an MOU for a three -year term The original MOU for the capital reserve fund was established for a three -year period with an understanding between MAX and the MTA that an amended MOU would be necessary to add an additional year to the capital reserve fund A four -year capital reserve fund is required to establish a fund that can adequately aggregate the necessary local share of the cost totaling $921,200 for the replacement of MAX buses With an additional year added to the capital reserve fund, the fleet of 14 buses will be replaced in the year 2002 as stated in Attachment B The amendment to the original MOU also extends the date by which capital reserve funds must be expended before lapsing from July 1, 2001 to July 1, 2002 If the reserve funds are not expended by July 1, 2002, any unexpended funds will automatically lapse unless prior to the lapsing date, the MTA has approved to extend the term of the capital reserve 074 ITEM 3C The contribution of each agency to the capital reserve fund will be the same amount in the fourth year of the MOU (FY 2001 -02) as in the third year (FY 2000 -01) Attachment A -1 of the amended MOU conveys the agency contribution schedule for each of the seven agencies representing MAX Respectfully submitted, By CONCUR Tom Whittle Transit Director Attachments Jim Mills MAX Program Coordinator Amendment to MOU for Prop A & C Local Return Capital Reserve MAX Duplicate Original of MOU for Prop A & C Local Return Capital Reserve MAX 2 75 AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITIES OF TORRANCE, LOMITA, LOS ANGELES, LAWNDALE, EL SEGUNDO, RANCHO PALOS VERDES, COUNTY of LOS ANGELES AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY This Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding (this "Amendment "), is dated as of April 5, 2000, by and between the Cities of Torrance, Lomita, Los Angeles, Lawndale, El Segundo, Rancho Palos Verdes, the County of Los Angeles (collectively, the agencies) and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ( "MTA ") RECITALS A The Agencies, except for the City of Lomita, and the MTA entered into that certain Memorandum of Understanding No MOU POMAXTOR, dated July 1, 1998 (the "Existing MOU "), which Existing MOU provides for Local Return Capital Reserves for bus replacement and B The City of Lomita desires to loin the remaining cities in establishing a capital reserve fund C The Agencies and MTA desire to amend the Existing MOU as provided herein AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1 Paragraph "FUNDING" of the Existing MOU is hereby amended by deleting the paragraph in its entirety and replacing it with the following new Paragraph. The Agencies will establish one capital reserve fund and will allocate an aggregate amount of $921,200 of Proposition A Local Return funds pursuant to the schedule attached as Attachment A -1 for the purchase of buses as specifically described in Attachment B ( "Project Description ") All interest accumulated on funds placed in the Capital Reserve fund shall accrue to that fund and be used for the project. The City of Torrance shall act as lead agency for the Agencies and shall be responsible for maintaining the Capital Reserve fund on behalf of the Agencies 2 Attachment A is hereby deleted and replaced with Attachment A -1 attached hereto 07G 3 The second sentence of the paragraph 7ERM/LAPSING of FUND" of the Existing MOU is hereby amended by deleting the sentence in its entirety and replacing it with the following new sentence. If the capital reserve funds are not expended by July 1, 2002, then any unexpended funds will automatically lapse unless prior to the lapsing date, the MTA has approved to extend the term of the reserve. 4 Except as expressly amended hereby, the Existing MOU remains in full force and effect as originally executed All rights and obligations of the parties under the Existing MOU that are not expressly amended by this Amendment shall remain unchanged by this Amendment 077 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the above date City of El Segundo John Gaines City Council Member Approved as to form 078 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Julian Burke CEO Approved as to form Lloyd W Pellman County Counsel 073 ATTACHMENT A -1 AGENCY CONTRIBUTION SCHEDULE Agency Share (Ifirst 2 FYS) Share (FY last 2 FYs) FY 98/99 FY 99100 FY 00101 FY 01102 Total Torrance 37 086% 36 476% S 85 407 S 85,407 S 84 003 S 84 003 S 338,620 City of Los Angeles 33 096 %I 32 552 °b $ 76 218 $ 76.218 S 74 966 $ 74 966 S 302 367 Lawnaate 1 672 °� T-&45% S 3 851 S 3 851 $ 3 787 $ 3,787 $ 15,276 El Segundo B 710% B 567Y° $ 2 0,059 $ 20 059 !F 19 729 S 19.729 $ 79,576 Los Anaeles County 3 245% 3 792% S 7,473 S 7 473 $ 7,350 $ 7,350 $ 29.646 Rancno Palos verses 76 191 °h 15 925% $ 37 287 $ 77287 S 36 674 S 36 674 $ 147 922 Lomita na t 544 °,6 na na $ 3786 S 3.786 $ 7,572 c oo1 4an Total 080 Page 1 ATTACHAENT B PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project establishes a Capital Reserve interest - bearing account begiiuung in FY 98/99 for the purpose of financing the local share of the cost of replacing the Municipal area Express (MAX) fleet of 14 buses in the year 2002 081 CAPITAL RESERVE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ESTABLISHING THE CITIES OF TORRANCE , LOS ANGELES, LAWNDALE, EL SEGUNDO, RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CAPITAL RESERVE FUND This Memorandum of Understanding is dated Jk � I 3¢ , 1998 and is by and between the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("MTA ") and the Cities of Torrance, Los Angeles, Lawndale, El Segundo, Rancho Palos Verdes and the County of Los Angeles (collectively, "the Agencies ") WHEREAS, the Agencies are prepared to commit and accumulate Proposition A _ Local Return funds to be used exclusively for bus purchase as agreed to by all the parties WHEREAS, at its regular October 1998 meeting, the MTA Board approved the establishment of a Proposition A & C Local Return Capital Reserve account for the purpose of purchasing transit buses for the Agencies ` NOW THEREFORE, the MTA and the Agencies agree as follows f--i N) FUNDING The Agencies will establish one capital reserve fund and will allocate an aggregate amount of $690,900 00 of Proposition A Local Return funds pursuant to the schedule attached as Attachment A for the purchase of buses as specifically described in Attachment B ( "Project Description ") All interest accumulated on funds placed in the Capital Reserve fund shall accrue to that fund and be used for the project The City of Torrance shall act as lead agency for the Agencies and shall be responsible for maintaining the Capital Reserve fund on behalf of the Agencies TERMILAPSING OF FUND The capital reserve fund will begin as of Ju ( I44 P If the capital reserve funds are not expended by July 1. 2001, then any unexpended funds will automatically lapse unless prior to the lapsing date, the MTA has approved to extend the term of the reserve. Before the end of the three (3) years, the MTA may evaluate the Capital Reserve account as it pertains to the status of the project and projected amount of funds available DUPLICATE ORIGINAL 0K., If the project is delayed, the Agencies must request in writing to MTA approval to extend the term of the Capital Reserve before the lapsing date. Without such approval, the unexpended funds will automatically lapse. This agreement will follow the conditions set forth in the Proposition A and C Local Return Guidelines pertaining to the Capital Reserve process (collectively, the "Guidelines'. TERMINATION If any party desires to terminate this agreement early and reprogram their contribution of funds in the Capital Reserve account, such party may do so at the end of a given fiscal year by giving written notice to the MTA and the lead agency of such intent to terminate ninety (90) days prior to the end of any given fiscal year, which ends on June 30th. The remaining parties to this agreement shall continue to maintain the capital reserve account as provided herein If the MTA terminates this agreement, in addition to the requirements in the Guidelines, the capital reserve funds must be expended by each respective agency for the amount contributed by such agency within three years from the time the MTA decision is made. If the Agencies reprogram the funds, in addition to the requirements in the Guidelines, the capital reserve funds must be expended by the original automatic lapsing date. CONDITIONS The MTA and the Agencies agree to abide by the requirements of the Guidelines, which are incorporated herein by reference, including without limitation; A. Submittal of Annual Project Update with updated Project Description Fortes; B. Reprogramming funds, and C. Annual Status Update COUNTERPARTS This Memorandum of Understanding may be executed simultaneously or in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall construe one and the same instrument. 1: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is executed by the parties as follows CITY OF TORRANCE � - ly -v9 Dee Hardison DATE Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM JOHN L FELLOWS III City Attorney By Heather K Whitham DATE Deputy City Attorney ATTEST S Herbers DATE City Clerk 084 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is executed by the parties as follows LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY APPROVED AS TO FORM LLOYD W PELLMAN County Counsel By %1 1 'a6puty DATE Deputy 'q Attorney 1 I U 085 ATTACHMENT A AGENCY CONTRIBUTION SCHEDULE $690,885. O86 SHARE FY 9/899 FY 99/00 FY 00/01 TOTAL orrance 0.37086 $85,407 $85,407 $85,407 $256,221. [AGENCY ity of Los Angeles 0.33096 $76,218 $76,218 $76,218 $228,654. awndale 0.01672 $3,851 $3,851 $3,851 $11,553. El Segundo 0.0871 $20,059 $20,059 $20,059 $60,177. Los Angeles County 0.03245 $7,473 $7,473 $7,473 $22,419. Rancho Palos Verdes 0.16191 $37,287 1 $37,287 $37,287 $I11,86I. $690,885. O86 ATTACHMENT B PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project establishes a Capital Reserve interest - bearing account beginning in FY 98/99 for the purpose of financing the local share of the cost of replacing the Municipal Area Express (MAX) fleet of 14 buses in the year 2001. 0 Fi EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE. January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION- Establishment of a professional service contract with Christopher A Joseph and Associates (CAJA) to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a proposed mixed -use project on a 46 5 -acre property bounded by Manposa Avenue, Nash Street, Atwood Way, and Douglas Street The amount to be paid to the consultant under this agreement is $116,850 00 The full amount of the contract will be paid by the applicant of the project RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION 1 Approve a professional services contract with CAJA to prepare an EIR; 2 Authorize staff to Increase contract by $8,500 if additional traffic counts are required, and, 3 Authorize a ten percent contingency Increase In the contract If unanticipated analysis Is needed BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION On November 16, 2000, the Planning Division received a Development Agreement application (EA No 537, DA No 00 -3) for 1,650,000 square foot mixed -use project on the above described property The project is similar to the previously proposed El Segundo Media Center project for which the City Council had previously approved Contract No 2762 between the City and RBF Consulting for professional services to prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA No 515, DA No 00 -2) The applicant for the previously project withdrew the application A new developer has submitted new applications for the El Segundo Media Center project Staff has determined that an EIR would be required for the new project on next ATTACHED 1 Draft Contract with CAJA in the amount of $116,850 00 FISCAL IMPACT Amount Requested: $137,900 00 (Appropriation offset entirely by developer deposit) Account Number: Various (trust deposit account) Project Phase: N/A Appropriation required: Yes O IGINATED DATE- C? -77:D i Chris Ketz, Planning pager REVIEWED Manager �� 12 STAFF REPORT January 16, 2001 Page 2 BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION. (cont.) On November 15, 2000, Planning Division staff distributed a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the preparation of an EIR for the proposed El Segundo Media Center project The City received eight proposals by the December 4, 2000 deadline Based on the criteria contained in the RFP, staff, in consultation with the applicant, selected four candidate firms to interview on December 15, 2000 These firms were Cotton/Bridges/Associates, Christopher A Joseph and Associates, EIP Associates, and Impact Sciences Based on the interviews and the submitted proposals, staff recommends that the contract be awarded to Christopher A Joseph and Associates (CAJA) as the firm most capable of carrying out the objectives of the project Staff recommends the retention of CAJA based upon their knowledge of the subject property and their proven ability to complete such projects in timely manner The firm and the project managers who will lead the consultant team have experience working on large mixed -use projects throughout Los Angeles and have worked on projects within El Segundo Staff have worked with the firm before and are confident of their ability to successfully complete the EIR Staff also recommends that the applicant be required to submit the full amount of the contract at the beginning of the project The funds would be placed in a trust deposit account, which would be used to pay CAJA as their invoices are submitted Staff is requesting authorization for the expenditure of an $8,500 optional item in the Scope of Services (Exhibit A- Page 10) in the event that additional traffic counts (up to 20 intersections) for the proposed project are required Staff has not yet determined if these would be required Staff is also recommending that Council approve an additional contingency budget of a maximum of ten percent of the contract amount (to be paid by the project applicant) that staff can be authorized to expend for any unanticipated additional analysis beyond the Scope of Services contained in the proposed contract P \Planning & Budding Safety\PROJECTS \526550 \EA- 537\CAJA Contract ais doc 089 Christopher A Joseph & Associates EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES December) 2000 Because it is expected that the El Segundo Media Center Project EIR will be scrutinized by affected parties, adjacent residents and surrounding communities, it is important that the potential environmental effects of the project be fully analyzed Although any EIR can be challenged, a comprehensive approach using appropriately conservative assumptions is likely to withstand any legal challenge that might be raised The EIR must respond directly to issues raised by responsible agencies and community organizations An EIR that provides thoughtful and well- documented responses to issues raised during the environmental review process is the best means of allowing applicants to proceed with their projects in the most expeditious manner In order to assure that the resulting EIR is both analytically correct and legally defensible, the CAJA Team will prepare a comprehensive and factual EIR that addresses existing conditions, project impacts, mitigation measures, cumulative impacts and alternatives to the project, along with a complete initial Study which provides full justification for the City of El Segundo to conclude that remaining issues not specifically addressed in the EIR would not be significant Any potentially significant project impacts identified in the Initial Study will be analyzed in detail in the FIR The EIR will be prepared based on the standards and requirements of CEQA the State CEQA Guidelines (as amended most recently on October 26, 1998) and the Cm of El Segundo The FIR will be prepared to meet the exacting standards of quality employed by C AJ S in the preparation of our previous EIRs throughout Southern California The following tasks would be performed by the CAJA team to prepare an EIR for the El Segundo Media Center Project Re%iew of Existine Information CAJA will review existing information from all previous environmental reviews and pertinent documentation and analyze to determine issues, findings and problem resolutions that could be relevant to the EIR Such information will include previous environmental review documents prepared for the project site such as the Federal Express Operations Facility EIR and El Segundo Media Center Initial Study/Mingated Negative Declaration (June 2000) A concerted effort will be made to utilize and incorporate as much existing data as possible into the EIR EIR Pi oposa! foi E! Segunao Nedra Cenier Project Page 090 Christopher A Joseph & Associates December 1 2000 2 Preparation of a Draft Initial Study The Initial Study consists of a checklist which is used to identify areas where the proposed project could potentially result in environmental impacts as well as areas where the proposed project has no potential to result in impacts CAJA will prepare a Draft Initial Study for the proposed project utilizing the City's Initial Study Checklist Form The Initial Study will be comprised of a completed checklist and detailed responses to all questions, with particular emphasis given to responses where the impact is not significant and the response provided will serve as the primary record of the City's determination that the impact is not significant The Initial Study is also a valuable tool in refining the scope of the EIR and identifying any required technical reports for the proposed project 3 EIR Notices CEQA includes prescribed noticing requirements to inform the public and other cognizant agencies that documentation is being prepared for a project CAM will prepare the Notice of Preparation (NOP) required by CEQA for the proposed project in the format used by City and will circulate it to all identified commenting agencies and interested parties The NOP will include a map of the project site, a brief description of the proposed project, and a preliminary list of the em ironmental effects to be evaluated in the EIR CAM will also assume responsibility of conducting a scopmg meeting with applicable City and state agencies as cell as other interested parties The purpose of the scopmg meeting will be to allo\& interested parties to comment on the environmental issues that could be addressed in the EIR A finalized scope for the Draft EIR will be defined after all comments on the NOP have been received and the seeping meetings are concluded CAJA will work with the City to determine if the comments expand the scope of work or require additional technical sections to be included in the EIR The Initial Study, Notice of Preparation and all correspondence receded in response to the NOP will be attached as an Appendix to the Draft EIR CAJA will also prepare and assist the City as required in circulating all other required public notices including the Notice of Completion and Notice of Determination 4 Preparation of Administrative Draft EIR An Administrative Draft EIR would be prepared for review by the City This subsection outlines the major sections which would be included in the Administrative Draft EIR FIR Aoposal for Fl Segundo tledta CCtaer Pro/tct page 2 u 9 1 Christopher A Joseph & Associates 41 SUMMARY December / 1000 A tabular summary will be included as the first section of the EIR The Summary will include an Introduction, Statement of Purpose and Need, Description of the Proposed Project and Alternatives, and a tabular summary of expected environmental effects In addition, a brief executive summary will also be prepared as a separate document, and would consist of a short description and background of the proposed project, as well as a listing of the environmental impact findings recommended mitigation measures, and a summary evaluation of alternatives 42 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The Introduction section of the EIR will include a narrative on the background of the EIR process statement of purpose and need, development of the proposed project and alternatives and a short summation of the environmental review and project approval process The environmental setting will provide a physical description of the project site and the surrounding area Existing improvements and land uses «ill be described The em ironmental setting will also provide a physical description of the project site and the surrounding area A discussion and tabular list of related projects/cumulative development will be presented, and the location of such development µill be plotted on an area map A related projects 'list- based" approach [CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b)(1)(A)] will be used to analyze the potential cumulative impacts of the proposed project in conjunction with other projected growth in the area 43 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The project description will provide a detailed narrative and graphical presentation of the provisions of the project, including proposed improvements and architectural plans The project description will include a qualitative and graphical description of the project location and boundaries including regional and vicinity maps and aerial photos For CEQA purposes, the project description will also include a statement of project objectives to be developed in conjunction with the City N7 P..>oo,al for El Se¢undo tfedia Ceruer Projrn Page 3 Christopher A Joseph & Associates December 1 :000 44 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION As an introduction to this section of the EIR, each environmental impact area determined not to have a potentially significant impact on the environment, as identified in the Initial Study described above, will be listed, with an accompanying discussion of the reasons for the determination Each of the areas of potential impact will describe the existing conditions, environmental impact after development of the proposed project and alternatives recommended mitigation measures, net unmitigated environmental impact after project development and cumulative impact Existing Conditions Analysts of the existing environmental setting is necessary in order to compare those conditions to any changes created and produced by the proposed project and to identify any significant environmental effects of the proposed project For purposes of environmental analysts within the EIR, the environmental setting is defined as the physical conditions in the affected area as they exist at the time the Notice of Preparation is published (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126 2, revised October 26, 1998) Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Protect Each of the environmental subject areas would be eialuated to determine impact significance Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a significant impact is defined as a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in the physical environment The specific criteria or threshold of significance for determining the significance of a particular impact would be identified in conjunction with the City prior to the impact discussion in each issue section, and would be consistent with the new critena set forth in the revised CEQA Mitigation Measures Where applicable, mitigation measures would be presented in each respective environmental subject area in the following classification scheme Mitigation Measures required to reduce an identified significant impact to a less - than - significant level * Non - Required Measures, mitigations that are recommended (but not required) to further enhance environmental conditions within the project and the surrounding locale, and which can reduce an identified non- significant impact E1R Proposal joI E1 StgWldo ltsLa Center Protect Page 4 093 Christopher A Joseph & Assouates December] 2000 * Code - Required Measures required by local, regional, state and/or federal regulations and statutes which must be imposed as conditions of project approval Such code - required measures would be listed even though they are not necessarily required to reduce identified impacts Level of Impact After Mitigation A clear, concise statement of the level of impact after the inclusion of mitigation measures will be presented Net impacts will be defined as either "significant," or "less than significant " Cumulative Impact The project's cumulative impacts in conjunction with identified related developmenticumulative growth within and possibly outside the City of El Segundo Related projects outside the City that might be included are the Playa Vista Development and the LAX Master Plan It will be noted throughout the cumulative impact discussions that such impacts generally represent a worst -case scenario (higher than would be expected) because impact projections for related projects are for the most part calculated without subtracting (netting out) existing uses on related project sites Moreover, it is assumed for analytical purposes that all related projects would be approved and developed within the time frame of the proposed project In addition, each related project would likely be subject to unspecified mitigation measures, which would also reduce cumulative impacts 4 5 ALTERNATiVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT CAJA will prepare an analysis of alternatives to the proposed project This proposal assumes three alternatives to be analyzed in the EIR (includes No Project Alternative) Such alternatives may include • No Project (Existing Conditions) • Reduced Project • Alternative Site Plan Configuration The requirements for these analyses are based on the "rule of reason" as dictated by the California Environmental Quality Act and reflect the needs of each particular project Specific alternative schemes will be determined upon consultation with the City and City staff It is noted that several recent court cases have been decided in California that can affect the scope of project alternatives in EIRs The resulting court decisions have made the alternatives analyses in EIRs more vulnerable to legal challenges which, in turn, has changed the standards of adequacy for such analysts The reasoning behind the rejection /H P1 upo,al for N Segundo Vedia Cewer Proiect Page 5 '194 Christopher A Joseph & Associates December ( 1000 of alternatives is typically based on the inability of the alternatives to meet the project objectives 46 MITIGATION MONITORING The EIR will also include a Draft Mitigation Monitoring Report as an Appendix to the EIR This CEQA - required plan must be organized around City policies and procedures The mitigation monitoring plan will list (1) project mitigation measures (2) correlate the mitigation measures to the various governmental actions that the implementation of the project will require and (3) identify the City andior other governmental offices or departments that should monitor the execution of the mitigations The Mitigation Monitoring Report will also establish specific reporting requirements, enforcement procedures and penalties, reporting forms and periodic monitoring schedules, consistent with the established procedures of City 47 OTHER EIR SECTIONS The EIR will also include the following required sections • Summary of l na%oidable Significant Adverse Impacts • Growth Inducing Impacts • Organizations and Persons Consulted • Report Preparation Personnel 5 Submittal of the Administrative Draft EIR to the City Typical agency review involves approximately two drafts of the Administrative Draft EIR The first Administrative Draft EIR is typically subject to the most extensive comments, with the subsequent drafts usually requiring fewer comments The review and correction cycle continues until the City has approved the Administrative Draft EIR for publication as a Draft EIR for public circulation CAJA will provide five copies of the Administrative Draft EIR on recycled paper to the City of review 6 Production and Circulation of the Draft EIR When the City has approved the Administrative Draft EIR for release as a Draft EIR, CAJA NN ill print 75 copies of the Draft EIR on recycled paper (and one camera -ready copy) and its Technical Appendices One electronic copy of the Draft EIR will be provided to the City in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format as well as one electronic copy of the Draft EIR in Microsoft Word 97 format CAJA will also be responsible for the circulation of the Draft EIR to the K t'r an�„a/ to, FI Sc e��ndo ll, dm C en4 r Pr air a Page 6 09 Chrutopher A Joseph & Associates December 1 2000 State Clearinghouse, identified commenting agencies and interested parties In addition, CAJA will prepare and circulate the Notice of Completion for the Draft EIR 7 Preparation of the Final EIR The Draft EIR will be circulated to the public for a mimmum of 45 days Following the closure of the public comment period, CAJA will prepare the Administrative Final EIR The Final EIR will consist of a summary, corrections, additions, and responses to comments to the EIR Each comment received on the Draft EIR will be responded to to the Final EIR The extent of work necessary to complete the Final EIR is contingent upon the amount and nature of comments that are received after the Draft EIR is circulated For the purposes of this proposal a is assumed that a workload of approximately 60 hours would be required to complete the Final EIR Should responses to comments exceed the anticipated workload, additional hours would be bulled on a time and materials basis, with prior appro%al of the Cin CAJA will begin preparation of the Final EIR immediately after circulation of the Draft FIR commences Dunne the time the Draft EIR is being circulated for public comment, the summary and corrections and additions sections of the Final EIR will be prepared Written comments on the Draft EIR will be responded to as soon as they are forwarded to CAJA by the lead agencies It is anticipated that some comments will be received before the end of the public circulation period and that responses to these comments could be prepared immediately upon receipt CAJA will make changes to the preliminary Administrative Final EIR following its review by the City When the City has approved the Administrative Final EIR for release as the Final EIR, CAJA will print 50 copies (and one camera -ready copy) of the Final EIR and circulate them to all appropriate agencies and individuals One electronic copy of the Final EIR will be provided to the City in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format as well as one electronic cop} of the Final EIR in Microsoft Word 97 format If necessary, CAJA w ill prepare the Findings of Fact for any potentially significant impacts that can be completely mitigated as well as a Statement of Overriding Considerations for any significant unavoidable project impacts CAJA will also prepare and distribute the Notice of Determination S Protect Coordination/Public Participation Successful preparation of the EIR will require effective communication between the City and the EIR consultant CAJA's experience in managing other projects of sirrular scale and complexity has shown that regular working meetings provide this type of communication FIR Proposal lot El Segundo Atedia Center Proleci Page 7 0 9F Christopher A Joseph & Associates December 1 2000 Attendance at various public hearings will also be required as a part of the EIR process CAJA has budgeted for a total of 10 meetings or hearings for all purposes over the course of the ErR process Attendance at additional meetings or hearings would be billed on a time and materials basis CAJA will also provide monthly progress reports on the EIR to the City ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES TO BE ANALYZED IN THE EIR Based on a survey of the project site, review of previous environmental documents for the project site, and review of the RFP. CAJA would propose to analyze the following environmental issues in detail in the El Segundo Media Center Project EIR • Transportation/Traffic • Air Quality • Noise • Geology and Soils • Hydrology/Water Quality • Land Use and Planning • Aesthetics • Public Services • Utihrs° and Service Svstems • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Population and Housing The following pages provide a summary of the content and technical approach for each environmental impact category which would be analyzed in a El Segundo Media Center Project EIR Laird Use and Plannina CAJA will eialuate the proposed project for compliance and consistency with established plans, policies and regulations, including the City of El Segundo General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and the proposed Development Agreement This section will be supplemented with graphic displays of existing and proposed land use and zoning in the project locale as well as tabular comparisons of the project's compliance The project will also be evaluated for compatibility with the existing and future land use patterns in the project locale The project's functional and physical compatibility with surrounding uses will also be analyzed Aesthetics CAJA will e%aluate the aesthetic impacts from the proposed development The existing N iew shed w ill be described from several different vantage points and perspectives F[R Mopo3al7m £l Seeundo Wedia Cewo Piotrci Page 8 1)97 Christopher A Joseph & Associates December l 2000 (foreground,nuddleground and background) The vantage points will be determined in consultation with the City The project's impact on the vrewshed from the identified vantage points will be evaluated Both panoramic and aesthetic qualities will be addressed, including architectural and landscaping enhancements seen from within the site Appropriate photographs and other illustrations will be included The aesthetic qualities of the proposed project (including architectural enhancements, decor, color, landscaping, building height impacts, the effects of building mass, intensity, skyscape intrusions and other impacts) will be described. using architectural renderings or other project graphics and narratives provided to CAJA by the project applicant CAJA will also revie" the proposed project's aesthetic character in the context of existing City of El Segundo General Plan policies that regulate and/or encourage various aesthetic characteristics Traniponattou and Circulation Crain & Associates will prepare a project traffic study addressing project traffic impacts at up to 20 study intersections The project traffic study will include the following tasks Task 4 - Scomne Meetine vv ith Cm of El Segundo Staff - Meet with the City's traffic engineering representative to scope and develop the project traffic study parameters This will be accomplished within approximately the first five days of the official authorization to proceed (Cost S1 000) Task B - Protect Traffic Study - Prepare a project traffic study based on the scoping requirements of the City of El Segundo This study will include but not be limited to the following • Em tronmental/transportation setting, including field survey observations, • Description of study area street system and available public transit serving the area, • Existing weekday AM and PM peak -hour traffic count information, as required by the City of El Segundo (up to 20 study intersections estimated), • Determination of weekday peak -hour project traffic impacts at study intersections, • Research of related projects in study area, and analysis of cumulative traffic impacts for proposed future study year, • Calculate existing levels of traffic service at study intersections, • Forecast of future year traffic conditions in the study area, • Traffic generation using appropriate trip generation rates, trip distribution and trip assignment for project traffic, ElR Proposal rm El Se¢undo ilcdia Center Pro/cci Page 9 098 Christopher A Joseph & Associates December! 1000 o Capacity and level of service calculations at all study intersections, as required by the City of El Segundo, • Discussion of project access, circulation and parking issues • Analysts and discussion of potential Congestion Management Program impacts and issues, • Impact analysts of conversion of Nash - Douglas one -way couplet to two -way operations • Discussion of potential traffic mitigation measures, • Analysis of traffic impacts of alternatives (trip generation only), and o Recommendations and conclusions (Cost of Traffic Study Not Including Counts $27,000) If necessary, Crain & Associates w ill conduct new traffic counts at up to 20 study intersections for an additional 58.500 Also, if more than 20 study intersections need to be analyzed, the count collection and analysis per intersection can be performed for $1,200 per intersection Task C - Meetmes/HeannesTresen tat ions - This task includes meetings with City staff, meetings with Applicants team, meetings with and presentations to public officials and, if necessary neighborhood groups and public hearings For purposes of this budget, a total of 6 meetings and 3 public hearings are included (Cost $9,500) Task D - Final FIR - Assist the FIR consultant with preparation of the Final EIR by responding to comments received during the DEIR circulation period relating to traffic, transportation parking and access issues This includes responses for a total of up to 20 transportation- related comments This task does not include any significant new analyses or data collection (Cost S3,500) If additional tasks are requested such as preparing conceptual designs of mitigation measures revisions due to change in the scope of the project, or negotiations with the adjacent and/or regional agencies we would be pleased to provide those services Separate estimates of costs for each of those tasks or other tasks that the City may request can be provided Air Qualuy In the preparation of the air quality technical report, Giroux & Associates will accomplish the following FIR Pi opwaI for El S. ¢undo Ai dm Center Project Page 10 090 Christopher A Joseph B Associates Aoise December 1 2000 • Using the previous analysts (e g Media Center MND and Federal Express EIR), summarize recent air quality trends and identify any subsequent changes in the air quality planning process • Land uses and populations in the project site vicinity that are particularly sensitive to air quality impacts will be identified • Project construction and operational emissions of entena air pollutants will be made in accordance with the procedures outlined in the current SCAQMD Air Quality Handbook (1993) • Using the project emission estimates, based upon the URB7G computer model, an evaluation will be made of potential short-term and long -term impacts that could result from project development as proposed • Estimates kill be made for existing, future base -case, and project -case roadside emissions of CO `hotspots" on intersections affected substantially by project traffic (e g for Lei els of Service D or worse) The number of intersections to be analyzed for CO "hotspots" will be determined by the amount of intersections that are significantly impacted by project traffic • A quantitative assessment of the effect of project development on achievement or maintenance of state or federal air quality standards will be made • Project conformitn with the draft 1997 AQMP will be evaluated and discussed Growth projections incorporating the project will be compared to those in the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) and the El Segundo General Plan as a basis for evaluating project consistency with AQMP inputs on area growth • The potential effects on local air quality of cumulative development in the area will be discussed • Mitigation measures to reduce any identified adverse impacts resulting during construction or operations of the project will be recommended, along with an appropriate monitoring program • Air qualm' impacts of alternatives will be compared to those of the proposed project As part of this task, Giroux & Associates will accomplish the following • Limited on -site ambient noise monitoring will be used to update the baseline noise characterization from previous environmental studies, and to provide input data to prepare a site - specific calibration of the FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model • The compatibility of the proposed uses with the current and projected noise environment utll be generally discussed • Short-term noise impacts associated with project construction will be discussed I Proposal for D Sri ¢undo iredm Cent✓ Project Page II 100 Christopher A Joseph & Associates December 1 1000 • Likely changes in the noise environment after project development will be quantitatively assessed This will include the evaluation of stationary noise impacts and mobile source noise impacts on El Segundo area residents, and in particular identified sensitive receptors • Conformance requirements of project development with the City of El Segundo General Plan Noise Element's noise/land use compatibility guidelines and local and state regulations will be discussed • Potential noise impact mitigation measures (e g berms, sound barriers) will be developed, along with recommendations of an appropriate monitoring program, for any potentially significant construction and/or operational noise impacts • Noise impacts of alternatives will be compared to those of the proposed project Geology and Sods Our evaluation will include a review of our previous geotechnical reports for investigations for immediately adjacent sites and available published and unpublished literature, including the State of California Seismic Hazard Zone Maps and Earthquake Fault Zone Maps, the County of Los Angeles Seismic Safety Element, and the City of El Segundo Seismic Safety Element �k e will also review the EIR for a previously proposed development at the site Our proposed sery ices are div ided into two primary tasks as discussed below Task 1— Geoloev and Soils For this task, we will Present on a geologic map the regional and local geologic setting of the site, including the location of nearby faults, Describe the topography of the site, Describe the geologic character of the subsurface materials, Determine and indicate the locations of known active or potentially active faults in relation to the site on a geologic map, Include a discussion of pertinent faults, Evaluate potential hazards related to slope instability, Evaluate the potential for subsidence, Evaluate the potential for flooding and inundation, and Discuss the general feasibility of the proposed project from a geotechnical and geologic perspective Task II— Setsmicrn Based on the available seismic information, the report will provide information on the following items F I Pr oposai for El Srenndo kItdia Center Project Page 11 iJl Christopher A Joseph & Associates December 1 .000 The historical seismicity of the region, The potential for fault displacement at the site, The effects of ground shaking, including the estimated peak ground accelerations based on the Design Basis Earthquake (DBE), The possibility of tsunamis and seiches affecting the site, and The possibility of liquefaction, seismic settlement, or lurching occurring on the site Population and Housing CAJA will assess potential impacts from the project on the location, distribution, density growth rate or growth policies of the housing, population, and employment planned for the area as specified in any applicable City of El Segundo plans, regional growth plan and/or other officially adopted plan for the area in which the proposed project will be located UnItnes /Energy Conservation CAJA will confer with appropriate personnel in the City of E1 Segundo and other agencies (i e , Count} Sanitation Districts, private waste haulers) to determine if the project can be satisfactorily served by the existing water distribution, sanitary sewer, and solid waste col Iec ion/ disposal systems CAJA will also contact utility agencies with regard to assessing the adequacy of natural gas and electricity services to be delivered to the project site for proposed development This effort will include coordination with Southern California Edison (SCE) regarding their ability to accommodate a proposed electrical substation which would serve on -site telecommunication/web hosting facilities CAJA will estimate construction and operational fuel consumption for the project Fuel consumption estimates will be made based on data supplied by the traffic consultant projections for vehicle miles traveled, and any appropriate reductions in VMT attributable to transit and TDM measures in the project CAJA will also contact utility agencies with regard to assessing the adequacy of natural gas and electricity services to be delivered to the project site for proposed development Hydrology/Water Quality This proposal assumes that the project applicant will prepare a drainage report for the proposed project to be used for both project design needs as well as the hydrology section of the EIR CAJA will be responsible for incorporating the drainage report into the EIR The hydrology analysis will consist of the following Describe the existing storm water runoff from the site, I /H Monowf Im El SiQundo i)edm Center Protect Page 13 �) Christopher A Joseph & Associates Public Services December 1 2000 Describe the existing storm dram facilities (i.e , locations, capacities, and evaluation of potential deficiencies) in the project area and any future master plan drainage facility improvements in the project area This will include consultation with the City Department of Public Works, Review of any hydrology studies previously prepared for the project site; Quantify post - project storm water runoff volumes from the project site based on the design level ei ent and assess the impact to downstream storm drains in terms of available capacity. Evaluate potential pollution of downstream facilities and receiving waters due to storm water runoff from the project site (during construction and operation of project) and recommend appropriate mitigation measures/best management practices consistent with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements and County SUSMP program, Recommend feasible mitigation measures if necessary to reduce hydrology /storm drainage impacts to less than significant levels This may include coordination with the County of Los Angeles to determine any need for constructing new storm drain collector systems andlor reconstruction of existing systems. and Complete the analysis of three alternatives, cumulative impacts, and residual impacts CAJA w ill assess the proposed project's impacts on public services CAJA will confer with appropriate City of El Segundo personnel relative to the project's potential impact upon sheriff and fire protection services CAJA will also analyze the potential impacts associated with the construction of a new fire station on the project site, as well as potential on -site locations for the proposed fire station Hazards and Hazardous Materials Environmental Management Associates (EMA) will conduct a Phase I ESA of the project site for the presence, or potential presence, of hazardous substance or petroleum hydrocarbon contamination A Phase I ESA typically consists of the following activities (1) A re%iew of all relevant records made available from interested parties, FIH ,', upwa for F1 b, vi, ndo tfcdm Ceeier Proj,cl Page 14 103 Chresiopher A Joseph & Associates December / :000 (2) An inspection of the site and reconnaissance of neighboring properties for evidence of hazardous material use and potential hazardous waste contamination, (3) A review of historical property records and available aerial photographs for evidence of activities or past uses on the property which may have generated hazardous w astes, (4) Communications with relevant agencies and review of agency databases for evidence of past hazardous materials use, contamination, or remediation on the site or properties within one mile of the subject site, (5) Review of mailable geohydrologic records for evidence of hazardous material contamination, and (6) Preparation of a written report summarizing the findings of the site assessment and providing recommendations as appropriate The Phase I ESA specifically does not include any soil or groundwater sampling or analysis activities nor «ill it include a sampling survey for asbestos - containing materials (ACM) or lead paint HoNNerer EMA will review reports earlier prepared for the property and any additional reports provided to EMA The Phase I ESA will be incorporated into the EIR «hick will be supplemented with an analysts of potential hazardous materials impacts that might occur from operation of the proposed project I P, ono,X ror Fl Seeundo Wedia Center Prgcu Page 15 104 Chrutopher A Joseph & Associates SCHEDULE AND DELIVERABLE PRODUCTS December 1 2000 As listed in Table 1, CAJA proposes the following schedule to prepare the El Segundo Media Center Project EIR ' • CAJA will review all pertinent project materials and prepare the Draft Initial Study within two weeks from authorization to proceed It is anticipated that the City will require at least one week to review the Draft Initial Study and that one additional week would be required for CAJA to revise the Initial Study and prepare and circulate the Notice of Preparation (NOP) • Copies of the Adtrunistrative Draft EIR and the Technical Appendices will be submitted to the Ciry within 8 weeks from authorization to proceed This schedule assumes that the project traffic study will be completed approximately 4 -6 weeks after project initiation It is anticipated that the City w ill require at least two weeks to review the Administrative Draft EIR Upon receipt of City comments on the Administrative Draft EIR, CAJA will revise the document as necessary within two weeks and submit the revised Administrative Draft to the City for review Following approval by the City CAJA will publish and circulate copies of the Draft EIR and Technical Appendices • C MA assumes a 45-day public review and comment penod for the Draft EIR Upon completion of the public review period and receipt of all comment letters on the Draft EIR, CAJA will prepare the responses to comments within two weeks It is anticipated that the City will require one week to rev iew the responses to comments • Upon City approval of the Administrative Final EIR, CAJA will print and circulate copies of the Final EIR which will include the Draft EIR, public comments, responses to comments, and corrections and additions to the Draft FIR • Based on the timeline described above and in Table 1, it is anticipated that the Final EIR could be completed within approximately eight to nine months from authorization to proceed, subject to coordination and additional refinement by the City as necessary This schedule assumes I ) that the scope of the cork described in Section 11 is not substantially expanded by the City, 2) that there are no delaNs in the delnen of critical information by the Cit) public service agencies and utilities, or the project applicant, and 3) that the lead Cm s re,iew process can conform to the schedule described herein FIR Proposal lot El Segundo ihdia Ceti er Pro /en Page 16 105 - s zov� _ y z - t .. r J i r < a Y r ° Z Y J • H c • y �yy ' � 5�t yy g c c U — U u L '> > o o u < c o N Y N U U U U � 3 3 ry N p Y U U 3 h C V ` T c in c � c 0 � G c '• c � V �u C u Y U _T U 3 > V V L T � L h a V u C G O n C d L T L h u E C U E y U c `o c U p Y E C° < U O O c U u 9 N N n H L Y A O V 3 � O- u " u a+ � A E 3 u 9 ` L v � o u� c n u a o o � d v E o= m c u S c c V 7 F V e ig 1Cl6 Christopher A Joseph & Associates EXHIBIT B COST PROPOSAL December 1 2000 Table 2 provides the cost proposal for the preparation of the El Segundo Media Center Project EIR The fees include costs for all subconsultants as well as costs for pnnting/reproduction, graphics, and other miscellaneous direct expenses Should the scope of work or number of EIR sections increase or change, the City understands that the consultant fee could exceed this amount Such changes include, but are not limited to the following Additional environmental impact categories added as a result of comments received from the public gosemmenral agencies and or other interested parties during the scopmg and Notice of Preparation period Additional analysis required as a result of project modifications or delays in receiving project materials • Changes and/or modifications in State CEQA Guidelines or legislation for preparation of Environmental Impact Reports • Udinonal hours required to complete the Final EIR or attend project meetings, public hearings or community meetings beyond that described in this proposal • An} changes to assumptions and/or understandings contained herein regarding preparation of the Draft and Final EIR Such authorized additional services would be billed on a time and materials basis 11 a comparison of cost proposals of the competing consultants becomes the determining factor to your decision- making process we ivoidd be iullutg to reiten a?td /or niodh, our price Any changes to our cost proposal could be based on further discussion and negotiation between ourselves and the City and would mitlude fill disclosure of cost proposals from all coisultmus competing to prepare this EIR 1 /H l i oposul for El Swqundo t led, a C enter Protect Page 19 107 Christopher A Joseph & Associates TABLE2 El Segundo Media Center Project EIR Cost December/ 1000 SCOPE OF WORK COST Christopher A Joseph & Associates Initial SmdvNOP $2,600 Draft FIR I" Adautustratn e Draft $20,000 Rex isions $20,400 Final FIR $9,200 Meenngs'Hearings (10 total) $5,000 Crain & Associates (Paid upon acceptance bt City)' Transportation Traffic Task A (Scoping Meeting with Ciry of El Segundo Staff) $1,000 Task B (Project Traffic Study) $27,000 Task C (Meetings'Hearmgs/Presentanonsl $9,500 G Task D (Final EIR) $3,500 Giroux & Associates (Paid upon acceptance b} City) $2,650 I\ it Qualm \mse I tl Law Crandall (Paid upon acceptance by Gty) $3,500 yGeolOev and Soils Fox tronmental Management Associates (Paid upon acceptance by City) $5,500 Phase I Em tronmental Site Assessment DIRECT COSTS (Estimated/Will be Billed at 100% of Actual Cost) $7,000 Pruning Graphics Postage, etc TOTAL $116,850* If necessary Crain & Associates will conduct new traffic counts at up to 20 study intersections for an additional S8,500 Also, if more than 20 study intersections need to be analyzed the count collection and analysts per intersection can be performed for S I '_(Ill per intersection I IR Proposal for £l Se¢ando Afedia Center Project Page 20 10F Christopher A. Joseph & Associates environmental planning and research FEESCHEDULE (Effective January 1, 2000) HOURLY RATES • Principal $180 00/hour • Project Manager $160 00/hour • Senior Em uonmental Planner $140 Whour • Emironmental Planner S12000/hour • Associate Em ironmental Planner $100 00 /hour • Assistant Em ironmental Planner $90 00/hour • Research Assistant $75 00/hour • Internet Research $60 00/hour • Graphics $50 001hour • R ord Processme $45 Whour DIRECT EXPENSES Direct expenses including but not limited to those items presented below, will be billed at 100 percent of actual costs • Purchases of project materials • Technical subconsultants • Reproduction printing and photographic costs • Postage, messenger and overnight mailing • Travel telephone Internet access and research fees and other miscellaneous costs 109 11 B49 W Olympic Boulevard Sude 101 -Los Angeles CA 90064 • Phone 310 - 473 -1600. Fox 310- 473 -9336 • e-mail cajoelr®cojaeir com EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Proposal to purchase one police canine, support equipment and all related training RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve purchase of new canine and all related support items on a sole- source vendor basis BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: Officer Ray Garcia was recently promoted to the position of sergeant and his police service dog, Dako, was retired from active police duty In order to continue the successful police K -9 program a new police service dog is recommended Police canines have proven effective over the years by reducing risk to officers, reducing time spent on building searches and in the seizure of narcotics and their proceeds It is recommended the City purchase one police canine on a sole- source vendor basis This request for sole- source vendor is based on the following factors • Proven reliability of canines previously purchased from Adlerhorst, International, Inc • Adlerhorst International, Inc consistently maintains higher standards of training than those required by California Peace Officers Standards and Training • Adlerhorst International, Inc currently is our monthly, yearly, and specialized training provider and this will maintain consistency in our existing training effort • Adlerhorst International, Inc guarantees their animals unconditionally The police service dog will be purchased using asset forfeiture account ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Letter from Adlerhorst Kennels Memo from Sergeant Garcia Memo from Lieutenant Tavera FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: Amount Requested Account Number: $50,000 $15,057 109 -400- 3105 -6241 A/F Project Phase: None Appropriation required: None Va b PS iii •. Police REVIEWED 4_. M ry S nn, City Manager Contingency Account DATE: /.Z//s /-, i 13 12/15/00 9 15 AM 110 City of El Segundo INTER - DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE December 13, 2000 To: Tim Gnmmond, Chief of Police (through channels) From: Mitch Tavera, Lieutenant Subject: Proposal for New Police Service Dog On today's date I spoke with Rebecca Brown, United States Department of Treasury Asset Forfeiture Division, I explained to Ms, Brown that our Department had recently retired a police service dog (Dako) and that we wanted to purchase a new police service dog using asset forfeiture funds Further, Dako was originally purchased with asset forfeiture proceeds Ms Brown said that using asset forfeiture funds to purchase a police service dog was permissible. It was her opinion that the Department was supplementing and not supplanting its budgetary resources MT /sn 111 Inter - Departmental Correspondence 12 -12 -00 To: Lieutenant M Tavera. K -9 Coordinator From: A/Sergeant R D Garcia Subject: Price information for new K -9 In order to accurately plan for the upcoming K -9 Officer opening, I have compiled a list of items needed for a new K -9 team along with current prices Item Cost Dog (all breeds) $6,00000 Basic handler class (6 weeks) $2,400 00 6' Leather leash $2500 3' Leather leash $23 00 30" Retractable leash $5000 Pinch Collar $25 00 Muzzle $20000 Subtotal $8,723.00 Other associated costs *Hotel room $3,15400 Per diem ($36.00 a day) $1,08000 Concrete slab and kennel $2,1000 Subtotal $6,334.00 Vender Adlerhorst *Hotel room is the Residence Inn Government rate at $105 13 (tax included) per night for 5 nights a week Grand total $15,05700 According to Dave Reaver at Adlerhorst, the next basic class will be held on January 22nd 2001 Further, the class is not POST reimbursable and the next basic class will begin April 9ih Dave will be leaving for Europe on January 71h, so if we would like a dog with particular drives /qualities, we should let him know before then Raymond Garcia 112 P.01 DEG -12 -00 01.19 PM U to vtir�t R 'I, I`„ I ovtP"ENT El Segundo Police Department Attn Sgt Garcia Tate a (310) 624 -2200 Fax x (310) 640 -7683 Dear Sir ?Oast \NTeRN4r'0yTO 4 ' n ��OE K -9 ACpQ�t� December 13, 2000 Pss'z4�a1_PoJic€ S-ervice jog ansi_TrAin�na -hank yrou for your interest in Adlerhorst We are a famiiy business owned by David & Pip Reaver C�, 7 1,2 acre facility In West Riverside County has been providing quality Police Service Dogs and training since 1976 •o ove, 200 iaw enforcement agencies Our program has evolved to be the largest private police dog school in the world D. rinq th s lenure we have introduced many techniques and theories that are considered stale of the art today Instructor Vaf[ Au oL' staff have at least 10 years experience In the training of police service dogs in addition we are continually training I. , lime police officers to instruct in our classes We believe the combination of hands on experience as working police Pog nardiers coupled with our comprehensive training program gives us the best training staff possible our instructor Vaif has an optimum level of both law enforcement and police service dog training experience This Includes 2u-4;1i4H1 as wel, as technigaj experience The training director has over 35 years experience in the field, as well as a lifetime teaching ,ecenliw tfom the State of California will) a specialty in Police Science All our instructors are California State 0 O S T of ,ato's Importing titLed -db 3 At, are the innovators of using imported titled dogs This greatly reduces liability by showing up to two years of training n, cr to procurement In addition we can provide a more street ready dog in 5 weeks than is possible with a 16 week ,'tie w -rh a dog with no, or minimal previous training 're procurement process In place today is second to none We are the only Importer who maintains facthties in Europe : °.e rave a vehicle that can transport 18 dogs, plus a trailer that will accommodate 10 more Ail our nclao m9nLIItid testing is hangs —on We do not simply call and "order" dogs from brokers We make 6 to 10 trips a year Every dog is . =s'eo personally Our testing is done away from the dogs familiar training area ands considered by European trainers as ire o` the most comprehensive selection processes 're iechnques and standards we introduced over the years have even caused many European agencies 10 reassess �e , lesbng and procurement 113 al1LERHORST1NTERNATin%Ar r.,:r CONTINUE FPOrl PREVIOUS PAGE 001 ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL, INC. 3951 Vernon Avcnue • Riverside. CA 91509 . 0-09)W-1410 • FAA (909 6- --'6P, PEA PA0232568 PA0232520 A compreh-ensty-e-attitte__n_cu4Mc&tlQa standard ofaerformancg Only since 1992 has P O S T developed a minimum standard for evaluating police service dog performance Prior to trial many used vague standards, often not In printed form Some even used foreign standards verbatim Our written standard has been in place since 1983 It has met the challenge of our courts Typically our training is stipulated to in court to attempt to keep out of testimony a training requirement well beyond the expectations of the most biased juror Our qualification requirements are continually reviewed and updated by our attorneys and ourselves All training. including marnten&Dj;"1iniD.2, will be_dOsPmnted. Th-c dWarfman superViggr will receive a &pp K. Description_OLDQ sAad G.UarA ee carman Shepherd between 18 d 48 months with spine and hips guaranteed for one year, or a Malinors between 18 & 48 months with spine and hips guaranteed for two years Any congenital problems other than spine or hips are guaranteed for 12 monins at 100% Guarantee includes training with replacement dog Each dog wiLLhatc" ml1l.tntugL0yllu1zhu0d 1 or K.N.P.V. JiOeDog / titk_QL gwYA1ont. The dogs te`mprernment and drive level is y�aranteed suitable_fQ[Police Service with the final derelmin_atiOn made by your apBncy�Lhe ouarantee for scJitability has Iimrlimit provided proper trafnlDg_an_dtteallh O1 the dQg-Ls majntaMecL ive guarantee, through our training programs to provide a level of training exceeding the requirements of the California 'ale Po ice Officers Standards and Training (P O S T ) certified entry level and re- certification programs The guarantee ;ovens any other State requirements as well Training standards are described in the enclosed Blue Book The first week �)' me oasic class as well as the patrol and detection re•cert f cation classes, are P O S T certified 11 1 DEC-12-B0 81 .+�' FM Price for DQO Cost for one German Shepherd Dog - Titled $5800 - Cost for one German Shepherd Dog suitable for detection- TRIe 56000 - Cost for one Malmots- Titled $5800 - Cost for one Mahnois suitable for defection- K N P V Titled $6000- Cali fo, prices of other breeds, untitled dogs or any special requirements your agency has We offer discounts for multiple dog purchases and pre payment!! Prfce.for Qciectip"ft.. -Dogs.L ciudLnQ a ing Cos: for one Narcotic Detection Dog including 4 week course Cost for one Explosive Detection Dog including 6 week course Cost for one Arson Detection Dog including 6 week course Prices for _Train ios Banc nii lei development course P 0 S T certified level IV 40 hours Entry level handler course Including Handier Development class 200 hours Entry level Narcotics Detection Course 160 hours Entry level Explosive or Arson Detection Course 240 hours °alrol yearly update class P O S T certified level III 24 hours Detection yearly update class P O S T certified level IV 24 hours Tracking class 40 hours Evaluators class P 0 S T certified level IV 8 hours lepanment instructor course 380 hours N early maintenance program on site per team Der year nearly maintenance program, off site Southern California only Yearly maintenance program 9fL311e other locations $6500 - 58000- S80o0- S29- $2400- $2500- $3500- $ 190- $ so- $350- $ 20- $3500- $1000- $1200- Call for quote- P-02 Seminars covering theory, practical applications and legal updates are scheduled or available on request 4' prces `or P 0 S T classes are approximate and subject to change ✓ve nave all equipment necessary for training Catalog sent by request We thank you again for your Interest in Adlerhorst We are anxious to fill all your requirements for a successful Police Service Dog program, if your needs are not met by this proposal, call and we will attempt to meet your special racu rerl S Ge ely :David Reaver Adlerhorst trite tional Inc I:J 2 -9 34- a m EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA DESCRIPTION: MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda Revocable Lease Agreement between the City of El Segundo and New York Food Company to lease a portion of City property at 630 South Douglas Street (monthly revenue of $618 50) RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve the Revocable Lease Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION' The City owns a 1 73 acre property at 630 South Douglas Street, which was acquired by the City to provide for the southerly extension of Douglas Street south of Alaska Avenue Portions of this property have been leased to other businesses for parking purposes with the exception of 13,360 SF which is currently vacant New York Foods has requested leasing 5,976 SF of the currently vacant area (adjoining the rear of its business at 2320 Alaska Avenue) at the same monthly lease rate per square foot charged to the currently leased areas For the New York Foods lease, the rent will be $618.50 per month The agreement provides for the City to terminate the lease upon giving a 30 day notice to the tenant ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. Revocable Lease Agreement with the map of City property to be leased FISCAL IMPACT- Monthly revenue of $618 50 Operating Budget: Amount Requested. Account Number- Project Phase. Appropriation Required: No ORIGINATED BY: O Date: 'JAN 8 2001 Andres Santamaria, Director of Public Works REVIEWED BY I_ /, Date: 0/ 14 N %COUNCIL 01UANUARYI6 06 (Fnday 1/5101 2 00 P M) 116 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVOCABLE LEASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE, made this day of by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "LESSOR "), and NEW YORK FOOD COMPANY (hereafter referred to as "LESSEE ") WITNESSETH: 1 LESSOR does hereby lease to LESSEE and LESSEE does hereby take from LESSOR certain premises located in the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, consisting of approximately 5,976 square feet, immediately adjacent to Douglas Street, of a portion of Lot 22, Tract No 26557 as shown on map recorded in Book 675, Page 97, in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, described as shown on attached Exhibit "A" 2 The term of this Lease shall be from month to month, terminable by either party upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other party At the expiration of the term, or upon any earlier termination of this Lease, LESSEE will quit surrender the premises herein leased, and the parties shall have no further rights or obligations as to each other with respect to said Lease 3 For the period commencing on the lease start date and continuing thereafter on a monthly basis until terminated, LESSEE shall pay as rent for said premises, the sum of $618 50 in lawful money of the United States, payable in advance, on the first n greemnt\newyorkf000 (12/27100) 117 business day of each and every month to LESSOR at 350 Main Street, El Segundo, California 90245, unless otherwise directed in writing by LESSOR In the event this lease commences on any day other than the first of the month, or terminates on any day other than the last of the month, LESSEE shall pay to LESSOR a pro -rata share of the monthly rental based upon actual days of occupancy 4 The monthly rent shall be adjusted annually, based on the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles area 5 LESSEE acknowledges that it has received a copy of the conditions enumerated in that certain deed dated January 11, 1968, by which LESSOR acquired title to the property that is the subject of this Lease, and LESSEE agrees to comply with each and every condition so imposed in said deed during its tenancy on the above - described property LESSEE has conducted its own title report and due diligence and is not relying on any representations or warrantees made by City 6 LESSEE agrees that access to the leased premises will be only from Alaska Avenue LESSOR and LESSEE agree that the intended purpose of this Lease is to provide additional parking for vehicles and all other uses shall be prohibited LESSEE will be permitted to use existing driveways No new curb cuts or ramps shall be installed by LESSEE 7 LESSEE agrees to maintain the premises in a clean and sanitary condition LESSEE shall not place or construct any buildings and /or structures on the premises At the termination of this lease, LESSEE shall return the premises to LESSOR in the same or better condition as the premises were in as of the time of commencement of this lease n �agreemnnnewyorkfcod (12/27/00) L 118 8 LESSEE understands that LESSOR has acquired this property primarily for the purpose of extending Douglas Street in the City of El Segundo to cross an existing railroad track, and LESSEE agrees that, in the event LESSOR should require the subject property for such relocation or for any other purpose solely under the LESSOR'S discretion, LESSEE does hereby consent to LESSOR canceling and terminating this Lease upon thirty (30) days written notice addressed to LESSEE LESSEE agrees to vacate the said premises within the above thirty (30) day period and remove all LESSEE'S installations prior to the termination of the Lease. LESSEE may cancel and terminate lease upon thirty (30) days written notice to the LESSOR 9 LESSEE shall procure and keep in effect during the term hereof a combined single limit policy of $1,000,000 for bodily injury and property damage liability LESSEE shall provide LESSOR with an endorsement and evidence of insurance which provides for LESSOR, its officers, agents, and employees to be additional insured but only in respect to the Leased Premises and which provides LESSOR with (30) days' notice of any material change or cancellation of said insurance coverage, by registered mail 10 LESSEE shall not have the right to sublet or assign the whole or any part of said premises, provided, however, that LESSEE may do so with the written consent of LESSOR Any such subletting or assignment shall not relieve LESSEE of any liability or obligation under this Lease 11 Any notice from LESSOR to LESSEE shall be deemed duly served if mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to LESSEE at n agreemnt\newyorkfood (1227/00) 3 119 New York Food Company 2320 Alaska Avenue El Segundo, CA 90245 Phone: 310 -643 -6151 Fax: 310 -643 -0325 Any notice from LESSEE to LESSOR shall be deemed duly served if mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to LESSOR at the address set forth in Paragraph 3 hereof In each case, the customary certified mad return receipt shall be conclusive evidence of such service Either party may change its address to which a notice shall be sent by giving written notice of such change to the other party as provided herein 12 LESSEE recognizes and understands that this Lease may create a possessory interest subject to property taxation and that the LESSEE may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied upon such interest, 13 The terms of this Lease shall be binding upon and for the benefit of the parties hereto, their respective successors, representatives and assigns 14 This lease represents the final agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior written and oral agreements and understandings of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof 15 In the event that any litigation is commenced respecting the enforcement or interpretation of this LESSEE, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney's fees and costs n agreemnlmewyorkfood (12127/DO) 4 120 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Instrument has been duly executed as of the day and year first above written LESSOR CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA Mike Gordon, Mayor City of El Segundo LESSEE go Jim Wharton, New York Food Company ATTEST Cindy Mortesen City Clerk (SEAL) APPR VED AS TO FORM ark D Hens y City Attorney n agreemn[ \newy0rkf00d (12127/00) 5 121 She City of El Segundo City Hall, 350 Bain Street El Segundo, California 90245 Attention: City I.lanager GRANT DEED UTAH CONSTRUCTION k MINING CO. f. 1'T" i•u"n CE L TRUST N. L hEf3 1 I%B AT B AZ C CD RAY E Lfl; County Record, O -o D TS 0.:- 7 t, 1 CTS FREE � S a Delaware corporation, Grantor, hereby grants to TIDE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a Municipal corporation, Grantee, the surface and that portion of the subsurface which lies above a plane 450 feet below the mean low water level of the Pacific Ocean (as said mean low water level is established by U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey bench marks along the shoreline) of the following described property situate in the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, to wit: 533 00 I •....net $4 40 e,,rwnts co�rn8 1 $5 50 tot U ♦wGEIfS , couW L 1353 Lot 22 of Tract No. 26557, in the city of E1 Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 675, pages 95 to 98 inclusive of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county. Said tract being a subdivision of the surface and that portion of the subsurface which lies above a plane 450 feet below the mean low water level is established by U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey bench marks along the shoreline. ALSO EXCEPTING all oil, gas, asphaltum, and other hydrocarbons -and other minerals, whether similar to those herein specified or not, within or that may be produced from said land; provided, however, that the surface of said land shall never be used for the exploration, development, extraction, removal or storage of said oil, gas, asphaltum, and other hydrocarbons and other minerals, and further provided that no installation constructed thereon shall be disturbed in any manner in extracting said reserved minerals, as reserved in the deed from Standard Oil Company of California, recorded December 20, 1960, as Instrument No. 1622, in Book D -1069, Page 898, Official Records. This Deed is made and accepted upon the covenants, con- C q 11 \i p� V ` ditions and restrictions contained in the Declaration of Restrictions executed by Utah Construction k Mining Co., a Delaware corporation, dated August 29, 1961, and recorded September 6, 1961, in Book 6t -845 of Official Records of Los Angeles County at page 678, all of which � are incorporated herein by reference to said declaration with the effect as though fully set forth herein, and said covenants, con- SPLCIAL A0 E;ICY - 110 TAX STAT i1Li1TS �I FE a .9 1908 i� 199 ` $11000 $55.0' iNOEANci , IEi � CO` T , COURn 533 00 I •....net $4 40 e,,rwnts co�rn8 1 $5 50 tot U ♦wGEIfS , couW L 1353 Lot 22 of Tract No. 26557, in the city of E1 Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 675, pages 95 to 98 inclusive of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county. Said tract being a subdivision of the surface and that portion of the subsurface which lies above a plane 450 feet below the mean low water level is established by U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey bench marks along the shoreline. ALSO EXCEPTING all oil, gas, asphaltum, and other hydrocarbons -and other minerals, whether similar to those herein specified or not, within or that may be produced from said land; provided, however, that the surface of said land shall never be used for the exploration, development, extraction, removal or storage of said oil, gas, asphaltum, and other hydrocarbons and other minerals, and further provided that no installation constructed thereon shall be disturbed in any manner in extracting said reserved minerals, as reserved in the deed from Standard Oil Company of California, recorded December 20, 1960, as Instrument No. 1622, in Book D -1069, Page 898, Official Records. This Deed is made and accepted upon the covenants, con- C q 11 \i p� V ` ditions and restrictions contained in the Declaration of Restrictions executed by Utah Construction k Mining Co., a Delaware corporation, dated August 29, 1961, and recorded September 6, 1961, in Book 6t -845 of Official Records of Los Angeles County at page 678, all of which � are incorporated herein by reference to said declaration with the effect as though fully set forth herein, and said covenants, con- SPLCIAL A0 E;ICY - 110 TAX STAT i1Li1TS �I FE a .9 1908 i� 199 BK03901 PC, 769- ditions and restrictions shall run with the land and be binding on Grantee, its successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this Deed ' this / /,& day of January, 1968, Att UTAH CONSTRUCTION & MINING CO, vice STATE or CALIFORNIA / t 1_Couwtr of 1 Ia . be /on era 8tory.- otr>osa^,Q appeared � At* �keaon to w to W Ihs Y� =p[x +dent n•d tkr_ = t_.3[��stnry o! th. sorpomtlon that executed tAI unthln Inatnw[nt, and silo knmow le n[a to be the pars.. %ahe tasatd it an b[hnt/ of such toryerothon, and ackwouleda[d to Ina that Inch oe1p014t on as Icd the mina, and /urdher ocknoml[dprd to ena that such mrporalm W Maeed the unth's Nllrrmewt purauan Itor n r[paoglalmw is Board of Dvee htY commulbw esp,r �1J /L _ Natary Pubis This is to certify that the interest in the real property conveyed by the within deed to the city of El Segundo, a municipal corporation in hereby accepted by order of the City Council on January 22, , p 19 68 a and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated January 23, 1968 -2- By Y.l �tzev�.k_ C ty Clerk•of the City of El Segundo', California. (SEAL) C N t e) N m N r � l'96L a + / N / N � O v A,, P) lot N r b � m Y N H `J N log m 7a � ,Sti'LlZ NQ WW Q N S is m a a t I t t 0 O I � �I W " z I O I I UJ ) I 1 � � N t =, aci X W 1 3 ) Q I li! U cri 1 _ I 124 V h Q N � a 0 CL voo ; m m � =, aci X W 1 3 ) Q I li! U cri 1 _ I 124 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Adoption of Plans and Specification for the lining of sanitary sewer access structures at various locations — Project PW No 00 -18 (estimated cost $60,000 00) RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1 Adopt plans and specifications 2 Authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The adopted fiscal year 2000 -2001 Capital Improvement Program includes a project to install lining over the interior brick walls of sanitary sewer access structures The work includes cleaning and sealing the walls from ground water infiltration and installation of a structural polymer lining over the walls This is a preventative maintenance effort intended to extend the life of these structures which were constructed in the mid 1920's Staff has prepared plans and specification for lining approximately 50 structures in the northwest residential area of the City The project is estimated to cost $60,000 including staff costs for design and construction inspection ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Area map FISCAL IMPACT: Capital Improvement Program Budget: Amount Requested: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: ORIGINATED BY. // S $60,000 $60,000 301 -400- 8204 -8393 Adoption of plans and specifications No JAN 8 2001 REVIEWED BY: Date: hAon, Q+.o.,., r.t., &A ----- / / °p/ N \COUNCIL OIWANUARY16 10 (Fnday 1/5/01 2 00 P M) 15 199 W \ LL W I11Nno3 S3139N3 SOl AM, 3MMON1wTN JO All] y2 00310 N.s U ` w ♦ w r,lYlr> r, Ct 3 n l•. ^n �•' S 9 vnn .t a Jti m IW 1).WM O a � u < 1 0 i Y eY .1,Ae ^J 2 Ili \ iMll NiiY'> a7 ' AYw SKIM < lus 1Y vl CAW U 15 .CIIC I I ^ 77"1 i 1111 aYrI T.I�� 11 _ Pq QO III ^^ Ir^k o III I IJ O`> � y ON130 :,c vYVwY1 6 a� 1C 4G,1 ^JI a uwuln — J� lC IIeC)YO as .31.21 as ev,.YVw � � 1S r..I's ��^1S •yl• l�� is yvel),s z a u I W u 4 � Q a \A.. „ \1�1,Y w r=.1 Is s♦ M%Iv stl jpq 6 W U / Y011rinr 1Y m m 111 1.v .ec3. W m r N 7M •ll 1♦ S vu1))mw � Av W. u 17 ]111>r1 i U. .l..nO,l C IIE O. .....,, ^ V V N . � n N •9 9 "w � „C�nn�' N r 2 W J U N i p O z W (Jr) O ui CL Q ,L 20 } H A m Z �v 126 J� 1s ,nw �� 1, •1[Y .110, z a u I W u 4 � Q a \A.. „ \1�1,Y w r=.1 Is s♦ M%Iv stl jpq 6 W U / Y011rinr 1Y m m 111 1.v .ec3. W m r N 7M •ll 1♦ S vu1))mw � Av W. u 17 ]111>r1 i U. .l..nO,l C IIE O. .....,, ^ V V N . � n N •9 9 "w � „C�nn�' N r 2 W J U N i p O z W (Jr) O ui CL Q ,L 20 } H A m Z �v 126 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA DESCRIPTION. MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda Adoption of Ordinance No 1329 which Implements the standard urban storm water mitigation plan of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Los Angeles region by amending the El Segundo Municipal Code Chapter 6 28, "Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan Implementation" (no fiscal Impact) RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION 1 Second reading and adoption of Ordinance, by title only, and /or, 2 Other possible action /direction ND AND DISCUSSION On December 19, 2000, the City Council conducted the first reading of the Ordinance and scheduled the second reading and adoption for January 16, 2001 ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS City Council Ordinance No 1329 FISCAL IMPACT Operating Budget Amount Requested Account Number Project Phase Appropriation Required No ORIGINATED BY. ate. vAvflwvaia.ryA JAN 8 2001 /zoe, PW- COUNCIL 0WANUARY1602 (Fnday 1/5/01200PM • V 127 1329 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, IMPLE- MENTING THE STANDARD URBAN STORM WA- TER MITIGATION PLAN OF THE CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD FOR THE LOS ANGELES REGION BY AMENDING THE EL SEGUNDO MUNICIPAL CODE TO RE- PEAL CHAPTER 6.28 AND ENACT NEW CHAPTER 6.28, "STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER MITI- GATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION" WHEREAS, The 1972 amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (referred to as the Clean Water Act or "CWA "), 33 U S C §§ 1251 -1387, prohibit the discharge of any Pollutant to na%rgable waters of the United States from a point source unless the discharge is authorized by a permit issued pursuant to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( "NPDES ") required by CWA § 402, 33 U S C §§ 1342, and WHEREAS, Municipal separate storm sewer systems ( "MS4s ") which convey urban runoff, including, but not limited to Storm Water runoff, are within the definition of point sources under the CWA, and N1 HEREAS, Pursuant to the C«'A, the United States Environmental Protection -%gencv ( "US EPA ") has defined the term "Municipal separate storm sewer system" to mean a comevance, or system of conveyances, including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets curbs, gutters, catch basins, and storm drains owned or operated by a city, used for collecting Storm Water, and WHEREAS, The US EPA, under the National Urban Runoff Program ( "NURP ") has funded and guided studies of eater quality from MS4s which drain residential, commercial and light industrial sites, and WHEREAS, NURP and other studies (cited at, among other places, 55 Fed Reg 47900) demonstrate the presence of Pollutants in urban runoff discharged to receiving «aters through MS4 systems, and WHEREAS, CWA § 402(p) requires that the City obtain a permit for Storm Water and urban discharges through the City's MS4, and NN HEREAS, Section 402(p) of the CWA further provides that NPDES permits shall require controls to reduce the discharge)(3)(13) of Pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, including management practices and such other provisions as appropriate for the control of Pollutants, and ORDINANCE NO 1329 STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PAGE NO 1 1 2 WHEREAS, the US EPA, in partial implementation of § 402(p) of the federal Clean Water Act, 33 U S C § 1344(p), has adopted final rules, known as the "Phase I and Phase II Storm Water Regulations" at several places in Parts 9, 122, 123, and 124 of the Code of Federal Regulations ( "CFR "), and WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board ( "SWRCB ") has devel- oped a plan to implement the requirements of section 402(p), § 6217 of the Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments of 1990 ( "CZARA ") and certain parts of the California Water Code, and WHEREAS, in partial implementation of § 402(p) of the federal Clean Water Act, 33 U S C § 1344(p), the Phase I Storm Water Regulations, the requirements of sec- tion 402(p), § 6217 of the Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments of 1990 and the California Water Code, the California Regional Regional Water Quality Control Board — Los Angeles ("RWQCB -LA ") issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( "NPDES ") permit and V. aste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Storm Water and Urban Runoff Discharges within the County of Los Angeles, Regional Board Order No 96 -054, NPDES No CAS614001 (the 'Permit'), on July 15, 1996 to each City in Los Angeles County, including the City of El Segundo, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Permit, and in partial implementation of § 402(p) of the federal Clean Water Act, 33 L S C § 1344(p), the Phase I and Phase II Storm Water Regulations, the requirements of section 402(p), § 6217 of the Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments of 1990 and the California Water Code, the RWQCB -LA Board adopted Resolution No R- 00 -02, approving and directing the Executive Officer of the R%VQCB -LA to issue a Standard urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan for Municipal Storm Water And Urban Runoff Management Programs in Los Angeles County ( "SUSMP ") setting forth the requirements to be implemented by all jurisdictions dis- charging storm A ater under the Permit, and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2000, the Executive Officer of the RWQCB -LA issued a Final Approved STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND CITIES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY (the "SUSMP ") setting forth the requirements to be implemented by all jurisdictions dis- charging storm water under the Permit and WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board, in Order WQ 2000 -11, modified the SUSMP by revising the definition of "Redevelopment," excluding Retaii Gasoline Outlets from certain design standards, deleting the applicability of the SUSMP to "Environmentally Sensitive Areas," limiting the applicability of the SUSMPs to dis- cretionary development and redevelopment in specified categories, limiting the applica- bility of the SUSMP to Redevelopment projects only if they result in creation or addition of 5,000 square feet of impervious surfaces, deleting the requirement for funding by proj- ect proponents who receive waivers, and extended the effective date deadline to February 15, 2001, and ORDINANCE NO 1329 , STORM %k ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PAGE NO 2 WHEREAS, this City is a permittee under the Permit and therefore is required by federal and state law to implement all requirements of the Permit, including the SUSMP, and WHEREAS, this City has authority under Article 11, section 7 of the California Constitution to adopt ordinances needed to implement these requirements, and WHEREAS, this City also has authority under the California Water Code to adopt and enforce ordinances conditioning, restricting, and limiting activities that might degrade the quality of the waters of the State of California, NOR, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SE- GUNDO HEREBY ORDAINS THAT SECTION 1. The El Segundo City Council hereby finds, determines and declares as follows Title 6 of the El Segundo Municipal Code is amended to add new Chapter 6 28, "STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTA- TION " to take effect on Februarn 15. 2001 and to read in its entirety as follows - CHAPTER 6.28 STANDARD URBAN STORM NN aTER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTA- TION Sections: 6 28 010 LIMITS OF CHAPTER 6 28 020 SCOPE OF CHAPTER 6 28 030 DEFINITIONS 6 2S 040 RATE OF DISCHARGE 6-18050 SUBDIVISION DESIGN o 2S 060 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 6 2S 070 CONTROL OF EROSION OF SLOPES AND CHANNELS 6 28 080 SIGNAGE OF STORM DRAINS 6 2S 090 OUTDOOR STORAGE OF MATERIALS 628 100 OUTDOOR TRASH STORAGE AREAS 628 110 MAINTENANCE OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 628 120 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 628 130 LOADING DOCKS 628 140 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE BAYS 628 150 WASH AREAS 628 160 RESTAURANTS 628 170 RETAIL GASOLINE OUTLETS 6 28 180 PARKING LOTS 6 28 190 VIOLATIONS 62S 200 INSPECTION'S 1329 ORDINANCE NO _ WORM IA ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PAGE NO 3 130 6 28 210 FEES 6 28 220 WAIVER § 6.28.010. Limits of Chapter Nothing in this Chapter shall be interpreted to (a) infringe any right or power guaranteed by the Caltforma Constitution, in- cluding any vested property right, or (b) require any action inconsistent with any applicable and lawfully adopted General Plan, Specific Plan, Plan Amendment, or Building Code that con- forms to the laws of California and the requirements of this Chapter, or (c) restrict othem ise law ful land use except as authorized by the laws of Cali- fornia, subject to the limitations of this Chapter § 6.28 020. Scope of Chapter This Chapter shall take effect on February 15, 2001 and shall apply only to approval of discretionary (within the meaning of the Cahforma Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq ) )yew Development or Redevelopment projects in the following categories (as those terms are defined in this Chapter) (a) single-family residences on graded Hillside sites, (b) 100,000 square foot Commercial Developments, (c) Automotive Repair Shops (SIC codes 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532 -7534, 7536- 7539), (d) Retail Gasoline Outlets, (e) Restaurants (SIC code 5812), (f) Home subdi%isions of ten or more dwelling units, (g) Parking Lots 5,000 square feet or more or with 25 or more parking spaces and potentially exposed to storm water runoff, as defined in this Chapter § 6.28.030. Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter the following words and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this Chapter unless clearly mapplicable. Words and phrases not ascribed a meaning by the "STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND CITIES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY" approved by the Executive Officer of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Los Angeles Region, on March 8, 2000, as modified by the State ORDINANCE NO 1329 STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION P \GE NO 4 Water Resources Control Board in Order WQ 2000 -11, if defined therein, and if not, by the regulations implementing the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, Clean Wa- ter Act § 402, and Division 7 of the Cahfomta Water Code, as they may be amended from time to tune, if defined therein, and if not, to the def rutions in an applicable permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Los Angeles, as such pernuts may be amended from time to time 11100,000 square foot Commercial Development" means "any Commercial De- xelopment that creates at least 100,000 square feet of impermeable area, including, but not limited to parking areas (See "Commercial Development' as defined below ) "Automotive Repair Shop" means a facility that is categorized in any one of the following Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532 -7534 or 7536 -7539 "Best Management Practice' ( "BMP ") means "any schedule of activities, pro- hibition of practices, maintenance procedure, program, technology, process, siting cnte- na, operational methods of measures, or other management practices or engineered sys- tems, which when implemented prevent, control, remove, or reduce pollution "Commercial Development" means any development on private land that is not residential or a site of an industnal activity, as defined in 40 C F.R § 122 26(b)(14) Commercial Development" includes but is not limited to, hospitals, laboratories and other medical facilities, educational institutions, recreational facilities, plant nurseries, multi- apartment buildings car wash facilities, mini -malls and other business complexes, shopping malls, hotels, office buildings public warehouses and other light industrial complexes not w ithm the scope of 40 C F R § 122 26(b)(14) " Directh Connected Impervious Area" ( "DCIA ") means a land area made im- permeable to water from which runoff may enter a storm drainage system without first flow tng across a permeable land area "Greater Than Nine Vnit Home Subdivision" means any subdivision where at least ten (10) single -famih or multi - family dwelling units are to be developed "Hillside" means a parcel in an area with known erosive soil conditions, where the development will require grading on any natural slope which is twenty-five per cent (25 %) or greater "New Development" means the subdivision of land, or the construction of structures or other impen ious surfaces, or both "Parking Lot" means an area or facility for the temporary parking or storage of motor vehicles used personally or for business or commerce, which contains 5,000 square feet or more, or twenty -five (25) or more parking spaces, and which is potentially ex- posed to stone water 1329 ORDINANCE NO STORM N ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PAGE NO 5 "Redevelopment" means, on an already developed site, the creation or addition of at least 5,000 square feet of impervious surfaces Redevelopment includes, but is not limited to the expansion of a building footprint or addition or replacement of a structure, structural development including an increase in gross floor area and/or exterior construc- tion or remodeling; replacement of impervious surface that is not part of a routine main- tenance activity, and land disturbing activities related with structural or impervious sur- faces Where redevelopment results in an increase of less than fifty percent (50 %) of the impervious surfaces of a previously existing development, and the existing development was not subject to these SUSMPs the Design Standards apply only to the addition, and not to the entire development "Restaurant" means a stand -alone facility where prepared food and drinks are sold for consumption, including stationary lunch counters and refreshments stands selling prepared food and drinks for immediate consumption (See SIC Code 5812) "Restau- rant" does not include co- located stalls or food counters in general purpose establish- ments such as markets and grocer} stores "Retail Gasoline Outlet" means anv facility where gasoline and lubricating oils are sold "Source Control BMP" means any schedules of activities, prohibitions of prac- tices, maintenance procedures managerial practices or operational practices that aim to prex ent storm A ater pollution by reducing the potential for contamination at the source of pollution "Storm Event" means a rainfall event that produces more than 0 1 inch of pre- cipitation separated from the prey sous storm event by at least 72 hours of dry weather "Structural Control BMP" means any structural facility designed and con- structed to mitigate the adverse impacts of urban runoff pollution (e g., a canopy, struc- tural enclosure) This category may include both Treatment Control BMPs and Source Control BMPs "Treatment" means the use of physical, chemical, or biological processes to re- mo%e pollutants Such processes include, but are not limited to filtration, gravity settling, media absorption, biodegradation, biological uptake, chemical oxidation and UV radia- tion "Treatment Control BMP" means any engineered system designed to remove pollutants by simple gravity setting of particulate pollutants, filtration, biological uptake, media adsorption or any other physical, biological, or chemical process 1329 ORDINANCE STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 133 PAGE NO 6 § 6.28.040. Rate of Discharge No New Development shall increase the peak rate of discharge of storm water from the developed site if this increase would make downstream erosion more probable § 6.28 050. Subdivision Design Unless inconsistent with vested nghts, the site design for all subdivisions subject to this Chapter to the maximum extent practicable, shall (a) Concentrate or cluster New Development on portions of the site while lea%me the remamin2 land in a natural undisturbed condition, (b) Limit clearing and grading of native vegetation to the minimum extent practicable, consistent with the construction of lots, and to allow access and pro\ide fire protection, (c) preserve riparian areas and wetlands § 6.28.060. Best Management Practices (BMP) (a) On the date this Chapter takes effect, those Best Management Practices which are listed In Tables I and 2 of the "STANDARD URBAN STORM "ATER MITIGATION PLANT FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND CITIES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY" approved by the Executive Offi- cer of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Los Angeles Region, on March S. 2000, as modified by the State Water Re- sources control Board in Order WQ 2000 -11, shall be deemed to be incor- porated by reference and adopted by this City and shall remain in effect until the City Council shall adopt by resolution a guidebook prepared or recommended by the Director of Public Works (the "Director "), catego- nzing development and Best Management Practices for each category (b) The Director may from time to time revise the guidebook, and the City Council may adopt these rep Isions by resolution (c) No Best Management Practice other than a Structural or Treatment Con- trol Best Management Practice shall be used in any development regulated under this Chapter, unless the guidebook recommends that practice (d) No Structural or Treatment Control Best Management Practice may be used in any development regulated under this Chapter unless the guide- book recommends that practice ORDINANCE NO 1329 STORM W ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 13 4 PAGE NO 7 § 6.28.070. Control of Erosion of Slopes and Channels Best Management Practices used on slopes or channels in New Development or Redevel- opment subject to this Chapter shall (a) convey runoff from tops of slopes, (b) eliminate or reduce flow to natural drainage systems, and for flows which cannot be eliminated, utilize natural drainage systems, rather than artificial drainage systems to the maximum extent practicable, (c) stabilize soil at permanent channel crossings, (d) vegetate slopes with native or drought tolerant species known to control erosion. and (e) dissipate concentrated Flows before they enter unlined channels § 6 28.080 Signage of Storm Drains In the project area of New Development or Redevelopment subject to this Chapter, a no- tice that dumping in storm drains and catch basins is illegal shall be (a) stenciled in paint or other permanent means at all storm drain inlets and catch basins within the project area, (b) posted at all known public accesses to natural or artificial drainage chan- nels within the project area, and (c) maintained to preserve the sign § 6.28.090. Outdoor Storage of Materials (a) All materials stored outdoors in New Development or Redevelopment subject to this Chapter which, if exposed to storm water, may reasonably be expected to add pollutants to it, shall be thoroughly isolated from con- tact (1) with storm water, by enclosure in a structure, or (2) with storm water, by a surrounding curb or other containment structure ORDINANCE NO 1329 STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PAGE NO 8 �3 5 (b) The storage area must be completely covered. (1) by impermeable paving and (2) any structure by an overhead covering that adequately diverts pre- cipitation away from the ground between the material and the sur- rounding containment structure § 6.28.100. Outdoor Trash Storage Areas Except where they serve only single - family residences, solid waste containers in New Development or Redevelopment subject to this Chapter shall be stored in areas that (a) are isolated from contact with storm water originating outside the storage area and (b) are surrounded with a barrier sufficient to prevent all trash from being transported out of the storage area, except during collection § 6 28.110 Maintenance of Best Management Practices (a) Every person applying to the City for discretionary approval of any New Development or Redevelopment subject to this Chapter, as part of that ap- plication, in a signed Anting, shall agree to maintain any Structural or Treatment Control Best Management Practice to be implemented in that development through means such as a covenant running with the land (such as covenants, conditions and restriction, commonly known as CC &Rs), CEQA mitigation measures, Conditional Use Permit or other le- gal agreement (collectively "Agreement ") (b) The Agreement described in subsection (a) of this section shall remain to force until ownership of the developed property has been entirely trans- ferred, and upon transfer, shall be binding on the new owners) § 6.28 120. Design Standards for Best Management Practices Except as this Chapter may specifically exempt, every Structural or Treatment Control Best Management Practice implemented pursuant to this Chapter in New Development or Redevelopment subject to this Chapter, for the area contributing to that practice. (a) shall be adequate to protect from flooding those parts of the contributing area adjacent to drainage channels, according to design criteria the (City Public Works or Engineering Agency) may establish, 1329 ORDINANCE NO STORM W ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PAGE NO 9 136 (b) shall be adequate (1) for the volume of storm water that, as determined by the formula recommended in "ASCE Manual of Practice No 87 (1998)," may be collected from the contributing area during a 24 -hour period in which the total storm water runoff exceeds 85% of all runoff vol- umes that have been measured for 24 -hour periods for that same area, or (2) to treat, b,, the method recommended in "Califorma Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook— Industnal/Commercial (1993)," and as determined there, 80% or more volume treatment of the annual volume of storm water runoff from the contributing area or (3) for the volume of storm water runoff from the contributing area produced by a storm event of 0 75 inches (c) Subsection (b) of this section shall not apply to any land area of less than 5.000 square feet being developed or redeveloped for use by any Restau- rant, or any Retail Gasoline Outlet (d) Where redevelopment results in an increase of less than fifty percent (50 %) of the imperious surfaces of a previously existing development, and the existing development was not subject to these SUSMPs, the Design Stan- dards apply only to the addition, and not to the entire development § 6.28.130. Loading Docks In any 100,000 square foot Commercial Development or in any Automotive Repair Shop, the design of any outdoor loading dock area in New Development or Redevelopment subject to this Chapter shall (a) use an overhead covering that prevents the entry of storm water or (b) prevent the entry of storm u ater by diverting it away and (c) not conduct storm water from any truck well directly into a storm drain system § 6.28.140. Repair and Maintenance Bays In any 100,000 square foot Commercial Development or in any Automotive Repair Shop, in New Deg elopment or Redevelopment subject to this Chapter the design of any repair or maintenance bay shall ORDINANCE NO 1329 STORM \t ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PAGE NO 10 13 '7 (a) prevent the entry of storm water by diverting it away or by locating such bays indoors and (b) use a drainage system that collects all water from washing and from leaks or spills and stores it in a sump for disposal and (c) does not conduct storm water from the bay directly to a storm drain sys- tem § 6.28.150. R ash Areas The design of any wash area for motor vehicles or equipment in New Development or Redevelopment subject to this Chapter shall use (a) an adequate overhead covering and (b) a device that clan fies or otherwise pretreats all wash water and (c) a drain conducting all treated wash water to a sanitary sewer § 6.28.160. Restaurants The design of anv Restaurant subject to this Chapter shall include an area for the washing or cleaning of equipment, which (a) if indoors. shall (1) be self - contained (2) use a grease trap and (3) use a drain conducting all waste water to a sanitary sewer, and (b) if outdoors, shall (1) use an overhead covering adequate to prevent contact with storm water, (2) be covered with impermeable paving, (3) be surrounded by a curb or other containment, and (4) use a drain conducting all waste water to a sanitary sewer ORDINANCE NO 1329 STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PAGE NO 11 } § 6.28.170. Retail Gasoline Outlets All fuel dispensing areas in any Retail Gasoline Outlet subject to this Chapter shall (a) be covered by a structure that (1) extends outw and at least as far as the grade break at all points and (2) diverts all storm water away from the fueling area (b) be paved with a material, other than asphaltic concrete, that is imperme- able to water and has a smooth surface with a slope of not less than two Per cent (2 %) but not more than four per cent (4 %), (c) be separated from the rest of the site by a grade break that, to the maxi- mum extent practical, prevents storm water from entering the fueling area, (d) extend outward at least six and one -half feet (6 5') from the outermost comer of any fuel dispenser. or a distance one foot (1') greater than the combined length of the dispensing hose and nozzle, whichever distance is less, § 6.28.180. Parking Lots To the maximum extent practical, all Parkins Lots subject to this chapter shall minimize offsite transport of pollutants by using the following design criteria and BMPs (a) minimizing impen sous land coverage, (b) providing for effective treatment or infiltration of storm water before it is discharged into storm drains, and (c) Use of operational and maintenance measures to remove heavy metals, oil and grease and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons § 6.28.190. Violations (a) Violation of any provision of this Chapter shall be both a misdemeanor and a public nuisance (b) The remedies specified in this Chapter shall not exclude any other legal remedy that may be available to the City § 6.28.200. Inspections (a) The Director of Public Works and such officers as the Director may desig- nate shall enforce the provisions of this Chapter ORDINANCE NO 1329 STORM "ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PAGE NO 12 i3t.) (b) As necessary, these officers may, at a reasonable time and in a manner authorized by the laws of California, enter and make inspections on any property regulated under this Chapter § 6.28.210. Fees The City Council may establish and fix the amount of fees for services provided un- der this Chapter, as authorized under sections 66016 and 66018 of the California Government Code § 6.28.220. Wager (a) Any person required under this Chapter to implement a Structural or Treatment Control Best Management Practice may petition to the City Council to wane that requirement as impractical, provided the petitioner has in good faith considered and rejected as not feasible all such practices available (b) The City Council ma% waive a Structural or Treatment Control Best Man- agement Practice as impractical if (1) inadequate space for treatment exists on a redevelopment project or (2) soil conditions strongly disfavor the use of infiltration or (3) the natural land surface where the BMP would be located lies (A) above a known unconfined aquifer or (B) less than ten (10) feet above an existing or potential source of drink-in- water Ic) Any petition for waiver not falling within the foregoing categories shall be forwarded to the Regional Board for consideration SECTION 2. Severabthty If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitu- tional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not af- fect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivi- sion, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional ORDINANCE NO 1329 STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PAGE NO 13 140 SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 2000 MIKE GORDON, MAYOR ATTEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Ordinance No 1329_ was duly introduced by said City Council at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of December 2000 , and was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN NOT PARTICIPATING Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM �'Z- ,,�WrkD Hens i y ttorn ORDINANCE NO _1329 STORM DATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTAT-10TF' PAGE NO 14 1 ,t 1 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION Award of annual concrete contract to C J Construction, Inc for P C C Curb, Curb & Gutter, sidewalk and other minor Improvements Public Works Project #PW 00 -14, total contract amount $50,000 RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION 1 Award contract to the lowest bidder, C J Construction, Inc (See attached Bid Sheet) 2 Authorize the Mayor to sign the standard Public Works construction agreement after approval as to form by the City Attorney BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION On November 8, 2000, the City Council adopted the plans and specifications for the citywide annual concrete contract and to authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids Staff solicited bids with estimated quantities for eight (8) items In all categories this contractor was low bidder Staff has verified the low bidder references and received favorable responses This contractor was awarded last year's contract and performed adequately Staff recommends award of contract to the lowest responsible bidder, C.J Construction, Inc up to, and not to exceed $50,000 ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Bid summary sheet 1►u19TTIi➢ Operating Budget $100,000 Amount Requested. $ 50,000 Account Number, 106 -400- 8203 -8357 Project Phase. Award Contract Appropriation Required* NO ORIGINATED BY Date Andres Santamaria, Director of Public Works JAN 8 2Q�� REVIEWED BY. Date Mary Strenn, Ity nager N \COUNCIL 01 WANUARY16 01 (Monday 1/8/01 1 00 P M) 142 BID SUMMARY SHEET C J Construction, Inc $54,570 Civil Works Corporation $59,095 3 W A Ras(c Construction Company $64,300 4 Ranco Corporation $66,700 N \COUNCIL 0lUANUARY16 01 (Monday V6101 1 OOP M I 143 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION* Recommendation for approval of the 2000/2001 proposed vehicle and equipment purchases in the amount of $206,41000 Funds approved and available In the 2000/2001 Equipment Replacement Fund RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Authorize the staff to solicit bids and award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder, purchase designated equipment, and dispose of all Identified surplus vehicles and equipment at auction BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION The 2000/2001 Budget Identified 13 vehicles, 1 transit bus, 9 pieces of equipment, and 3 police motorcycles for replacement during this fiscal year As in past years, the Equipment Maintenance Division and staff from the Police, Fire, Budding and Planning, Parks & Recreation, and Public Works Departments have completed their evaluation of the vehicles and equipment, as well as each Department's needs The goal was to optimize the usage of the existing fleet, taking Into account the need for the vehicle, Its (continued on next page.. . ) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Equipment Schedule W119ASAA Operating Budget Equipment Replacement Fund Amount Requested $206,41000 Account Number 601 -400- 0000 -8105 Project Phase Annual Appropriation Required. NO ORIGINATED BY p Date aAA-� JAN 4 2001 Andres Santamana, Director of Public Works RFVirwrn RV n -. -. 1 Mary enn, City Manager N 1COUNCIL OIWANUARY16 03 (Tuesday 1/9/01 2 00 P M ) 18 144 BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION (continued): age, mileage, and repair record Only after determining that the existing vehicles and/or equipment could no longer meet the needs of the department did staff recommend the replacement of these units This evaluation resulted in the re- assignment of 2 units and deferring the replacement of 8 vehicles, 6 pieces of equipment, and two motorcycles, providing a good overall balance to the City's fleet NOTE: The City can award to any existing government contract that was competitively bid and agreed to by the vendor receiving the award All proceeds received from auction will be recorded into account 001 - 300 - 0000 -3901 (General Fund) or 112- 300 -3901 (Prop A" Fund) N \COUNCIL 01\JANUARYI6 03 (Tuesday 119101 2 00 P M) 145 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE 146 ORIG REPLACE UNIT MODEL DATE/ NUMBER & YEAR CURRENT MILE RECOMMENDATION 4309 1990 Ford 1998/99 Replace this with a used in -kind unit This Police Taurus 67,000 unit will be transferred to the Police Traffic division as a parking control unit, replacing 4383 which will be sold at auction Cost $19,000 4310 1991 Ford 1999/00 Replace this sedan with a used, in -kind Police Taurus 65,000 unit This unit will be sold at auction Cost $19,000 2318 1988 Pickup 1998/99 Replace this unit with a new in -kind Water/ Truck 109,000 pickup This unit will be sold at auction Wastewater Cost $29,760 2662 1975 Air 2000/01 Replace this unit with a new in -kind Streets Compressor 1,200 hours compressor This unit will be sold at auction Cost $17,400 6421 1976 Brush 2000/01 Replace this unit with a new in -kind Parks & Rec Chipper 1,800 hours chipper. This unit will be sold at auction Cost $22,000 3321 1989 Jaws- 2000101 Replace this with a new in -kind unit This Fire of -Life N/A unit will be sold at auction Cost $23,400 3329 1993 Jaws- 2000/01 Replace this with a new in -kind unit This Fire of -Life N/A unit will be sold at auction Cost $23,400 2507 1987 Chev 2000/01 Replace this with a newer 1997 Police Water Sedan 48,000 unit This unit will be sold at auction Cost $3,000 4083 1985 1996/98 Replace this with a new engine analyzer Equipment Engine that can be upgraded for the newer fleet Maintenance Analyzer Cost $26,800 3312 Additional To purchase a used sedan for the Fire Sedan Principal Prevention Specialist, approved in the 2000/2001 Budget Cost $22,650 146 Equipment Schedule January 16, 2000 Page 2 Note All new vehicles and equipment purchased will be either low emission or an alternative fuel type, where applicable The new fleet will meet or exceed all Air Quality Management District regulations Other items to be auctioned at this time Unit 1116, 1991 pool car Unit 2106, 1977 generator Unit 2108, 1987 generator Unit 2300, 1986 sedan Unit 2519, 1980 cut -off saw Unit 2532, 1997 rammer compactor Unit 4025, 1990 Police motorcycle Unit 4029, 1996 Police motorcycle Unit 4301, 1981 Police van Unit 6538, 1992 grass edger Unit 6581, 1996 lawnmower Unit number and age unknown, engine valve grinding machine IJIUKRAMMUFUTMI 1 4 1 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING- Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION Acceptance of the lining of sanitary sewer access structures — Project No PW 00 -12 (final contract amount = $62,460 39) RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION 1 Accept the work as complete 2 Authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's Office BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION On September 5, 2000, The City Council awarded a contract for $50,000 00 to Transportable Treatment Services for the 1999 -2000 annual program for the lining of sanitary sewer access structures The work has now been satisfactorily completed The final contract amount, based on measured quantities, is $62,460 39 Staff recommends City Council acceptance of the work ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS 1 Notice of completion 2 Area map FISCAL IMPACT Capital Improvement Program $60,00000 Amount Requested $62,46039 Account Number 301 -400- 8204 -8393 Protect Phase Accept the work as complete Appropriation Required No ORIGINATED BY a Date AN R Inm N \COUNCIL 01WANUARY16 -09 (Monday 1/9/01 1 00 P M) 19 148 Recording Requested by and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk, City Hall 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT Project Name Lining of Sanitary Sewer Access Structures Protect No PW 00 -12 Notice is hereby given pursuant to State of California Civil Code Section 3093 at seq that 1 The undersigned is an officer of the owner of the interest stated below in the property hereinafter described 2 The full name of the owner is City of El Segundo 3 The full address of the owner is City Hall, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA, 90245 4 The nature of the interest of the owner is Public street right -of -way 5 A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was field reviewed by the City Engineer on December 8, 2000 The work done was Lining of sanitary sewer access structures 6 On January 16, 2001, the City Council of the City of El Segundo accepted the work of this contract as being complete and directed the recording of this Notice of Completion in the Office of the County Recorder 7 The name of the Contractor for such work of improvement was Transportable treatment services 8 The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows Various streets 9 The street address of said property is Not applicable (various streets) Dated Bellur K Devaraj City Engineer VERIFICATION I, the undersigned, say I am the City Engineer of the City El Segundo, the declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion, I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof, the same is true of my own knowledge I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct Executed on 2001, at El Segundo, California Bellur K Devarat City Engineer H NOTZESPW00 -12NOC 14 n '..tj W- oL e f a v Q � s J eV ■ 3 W s I� w W J IL w D Y�W4 J Q D af•ofwsew ro ufo *safe fee r I . L ..ate i u w. z U Um,, ,w a. Lm. _I I uMflos slVswr s01 fy � u Y n '..tj W- oL e f a v Q � s J eV ■ 3 W s I� w W J IL w D Y�W4 J Q D af•ofwsew ro ufo *safe fee r I . L ..ate 1. i I a.a w e`Cs u w. z U Um,, ,w a. Lm. Y fy � u Y f • 1211 f O NOR 1. i I a.a w e`Cs O D z co W LL. H O J W a a U. s o r H u, s V J 150 u w. z U Um,, ,w a. Lm. O D z co W LL. H O J W a a U. s o r H u, s V J 150 z I Y fy � u Y O D z co W LL. H O J W a a U. s o r H u, s V J 150 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA DESCRIPTION MEETING DATE- January 16, 2001 AGENDA HEADING Consent Agenda Application to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (MTA) 2001 Call for Projects ENDED COUNCIL ACTION Authorize staff to submit an application for the conversion of the Nash Street - Douglas Street one -way street system to a two -way street system (estimated cost $1 65 million) BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION (Background and Discussion begins on the next page.........) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FISCAL IMPACT Potential City matching expenditure of $577,500 if MTA approves the grant application Operating Budget Amount Requested Account Number Protect Phase Appropriation Required None at this time ORIGINATED BY Date JAN 10 2001 Andres Santamaria. Director of Public Works REVIEWED BY n. l 'It„ Date /, I b /1.1 N =UNCIL01 WANUARY 1605(Tuesday 1 /9/01200 PM) O 151 BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION The MTA has solicited project requests from local agencies for its 2001 Call for Projects seeking MTA grant funds The last date for submitting applications is February 2, 2001 Nash Street — Douglas Street One -Way to Two -Way Street Conversion Nash and Douglas Streets, between El Segundo Boulevard and Imperial Highway, are currently one -way streets This project proposes the conversion of the current one -way system to a two -way system to improve the access to businesses and private properties fronting the two (2) streets The scope of work Includes modifications and upgrades to all twelve (12) traffic signals, new signals, re- striping and re- signing the streets, and construction of the landscaped raised median Islands on Douglas Street where feasible Application Modal Category Estimated project cost Regional Surface Transportation Improvements $1 65 million Minimum Local Agency match requirement 35% = $577,500 Comment The City's matching amount may be funded through a combination of gas tax revenues, traffic mitigation fees and Proposition "C" local return revenues N ICOUNCILOI JANUARYIB CS a T wey Imol 2 oo P M ) , 5 2 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING- Consent Calendar AGENDA DESCRIPTION. Examination plans for the Personnel Merit System job classification of Senior Planner RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION. Approve the Examination Plans INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Chapter 2 28 080 of the El Segundo Municipal Code, entitled "Administration and Personnel', provides that the Personnel Officer shall review and recommend to the City Manager, who in turn shall recommend to the City Council, an appropriate examination plan and weights for each portion of the examination for Personnel Merit System job classifications DISCUSSION -REFER TO ATTACHMENT - ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FISCAL IMPACT (Check one) Operating Budget Capital Improv. Budget, Amount Requested Project/AccountBudget ProjecUAccount Balance Date Account Number Project Phase Appropriation Required - Yes_, No ORIGIN Jeff ,Stewakt' Assistant C Date: January 10, 2001 EWED BY Date- 1" 710/0/ Mary Strenn, City Manager ACTION TAKEN 21 153 DISCUSSION The Human Resources Department has initiated the recruitment, testing and selection process for the job classification of Senior Planner and has posted the notices of the examinations in accordance with the Citys Municipal Code and the City's Personnel Rules and Regulations It is recommended that the City Council approve the examination plans that contain the following examination techniques and weights for each portion of the examinations Senior Planner (Open - Competitive) Career Preparation Interview & Structured Technical Interview Weighted 100% I r 1I EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: New Business AGENDA DESCRIPTION Presentation by Kilroy Corporation regarding application to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (MTA) 2001 Call for Projects — Imperial Highway (southside) Streetscape Enrichment Project, between Nash Street and Pershing Drive RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION After Kilroy Corporation's presentation of this Imperial Highway landscape project, the Council may authorize staff to submit an application for the MTA 2001 Call for Protects (Estimated project cost = $1 6 million — Local Agency Match, which can include funds from public and private sources = $320,000) BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION (Background and Discussion begins on the next page.........) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FISCAL IMPACT Potential City matching expenditure of $320,000 if MTA approves the grant application Operating Budget Amount Requested Account Number Protect Phase Appropriation Required None at this time ORIGINATED BY a Date Andres Santamana. Director of Public Works JAN 10 2001 D BY 1-7 f_ Date. 22 N \COUNCIL0IUANUARYI6 04 (Wednesday V10101 9 00 A M) /5j BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION Kilroy Corporation requested that the City of El Segundo submit an application for this project to the MTA for funding in the 2001 Call for Projects Kilroy also developed the cost estimates for the proposed project Only municipalities are allowed to submit applications The last date for submitting applications is February 2, 2001 The overall limits of the project is Imperial Highway from Aviation Boulevard and Pershing Drive The project is proposed to be split into three (3) phases The application for the 2001 Call for Projects would only contain Phase One Phase One Landscaping and streetscapjng of the southside of Imperial Highway between Nash Street and Pershing Drive This project is entirely within the El Segundo City limits and includes a City entrance sign at the Imperial Highway /Main Street intersection An additional City entrance sign funded by the business community is also proposed at the southwest corner of the Imperial Highway /Sepulveda Boulevard intersection to compliment this protect Application Modal Category Transportation Enhancement Activities Estimated project cost $1 6 million Minimum Local Agency match requirement 20% _ $320,000 (These funds can be from public or private sources) Phase Two (future project not included in the MTA Cali for Proiects application) Landscaping and streetscapjng of the center median islands and the northsjde of Imperial Highway between Aviation Boulevard and Pershing Drive estimated to cost $2 4 million Phase Three (future project not included in the MTA Call for Proiects application Artwork lighting improvements to enhance the areas under the Century Freeway (1 -105) with an estimated cost of $6 6 million N \COUNCILOWANUARV16 04 (Wednesday 1/10/01 900 A M A 1 5 6 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE. January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AGENDA DESCRIPTION Discussion of ongoing electrical power Issues RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Discussion and /or possible direction to staff BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FISCAL IMPACT N/A Operating Budget Amount Requested Account Number Project Phase Appropriation Required Yes_ No ORIGINATED --),. f -John Gaines, Council Member DATE January 10, 2001 REVIEWED BY DATE Mgr St nn, City Manager 157 23 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AGENDA DESCRIPTION Request to determine Council Interest In and representation at the National League of Cities' Congressional City Conference 2001 entitled "Investing In Communities — Investing in America's Future," to be held March 9 -13, 2001 in Washington, D C RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION' Discussion and /or possible direction to staff BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION, This conference has not been budgeted for in Fiscal Year 2000 -2001 An appropriation will be necessary to cover expenses for any representative(s) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Conference brochure FISCAL IMPACT The cost to attend the Conference is approximately $2,330 per person An appropriation will be required Operating Budget Amount Requested Account Number Pro)ect Phase Appropriation Required Yes, No ORIGINATED DATE. January 10, 2001 Z& Nancy W6mick, Council Member REVIEWED BY DATE. January 10, 2001 Mary Strenn, City Manager 9D/ 158 24 2001 will begin u ith a new President a new Congress and a new domestic agenda for Investing in Communmes spearheaded by \LC and a coalition of more than N national organizations \Frtb this changing scene in 1l zshington you can t afford to muss thz 2001 Congressional Cin Conference March 9 13 at the 11 ashingion Hilron and Towers The new President and 107th Congress ,,ill assume office with ancrhing bur a clear mandate from the wtea A msputed Presidential election and razor thin Republican malo,nies in the House and mate suggest per halo a manrtate for a new bioarnsan coalition ma, sea pontical differences aside in Fator of aerie%ing consensus on tough public poucy issues \LC's Incoming President Dennis Archer is leading the effort to ensure that the Investing in Commumues agenda resomres with the new Unutrusttation and Congresx Ile agenda calls on the new leadership to' invest in gmmc , s future by creating new partnerships that build a vital and prosperous future for all of ,imzna s mmmuiuues The sit point action focuses on ✓reducing povern by improving public education lob tiauung and public [tans portation ✓investing in revitalizing existing cornmumires and providing affordable housing ✓budoutg and macricamung local infrastructure ✓intestine in children youth and families ✓supporting and protecting local authority and responsibdin- and ✓promoting equal opportunity for all 10 REASONS TO ATTEND THE 2001 CONGRESSIONAL CITY CONFERENCE 1 'iou Il izarn first hand about me new . ions vision for imenca darer¢ in, .omm, tour v ears and now that v aeon connects u i I \ LC s Inv esunz in Core ^,umnes plan �7 lou II hear abou, the plar� ard agendas for G. ,tic I0 -,n Conerass and Fw [tie new races ,ill mGuence leeislante action u, '00, 3 1 ou L help shape• \LC s pnonties and tires . >age on the Invetna in Cornmurunes agenda amo uih zuide our advocac work in'_001 4 lo[. II hear from neuiv elected and newly . aopomted leaden in 1lashmgion who if snare their perspecmes on key issues affecting cams and mo its I The Congressional Cnv Conference provides a unique opporrumw to learn about he% you can help advance the agenda and be part of a unified and powerful voice to Volungton en behalf of .immns roitvnunines 5 low U have a chance in meet wrath }roar. . Corumissionail delegation to discuss local priorities for naaonal action and influence haw tnev II Note on key issues 6 5 ou U learn me federal perspective on a . wide range of issues affecting your an such a, eleeuoruc commetee egwry takings, pnvaev ho isutg and investrnmt in mfraswcnm 7lou Ube able to attend special Leadership . Trauung Institute seminars that will increase the value of your v an to %ashmgton 8lou U share a <pmmces and . nemork with local leaders from throughout the country 91ou II see old friends and . make news ones 10lou 11 be a ket player as . part of the \LC team at 1 the national level - and you II be able to make a difference for your hometown Come to CCC 2001 to learn, exchange ideas and make the connections that utll male a difference in 2001 L., 6 •'a \M 9 7 CCC 2001 will feature legislative and policy sessions, workshops, and meetings on Capitol Hill wath congressional and administration leaders to focus on the federal Issues that will be most critical to canes and towns in 2001 and beyond Examples of some issues that will be covered at CCC 2001 include ELECTRONIC CO\RIERCEEQUM The I Oeth Congress tailed to resoh, the key issue hang non and rotes as online shopping become, a wan of life and threatens the town of tradtuora! retad,rs and the sales tax as a viabr, source of roe enu, for bdu pubhc senses Uhl, Cong,., debated but did not fmalue legislation in 200b states and lad go"mmeam mnnnud to cork together to develop a streamlined sal s tax , s tom that unold snmpldy tax swo:ms and reduce the burden of collemon on mterstan ymdorz Learn w hat s ahead as vas unponant ouch, policy debate wnunues TELECO\RIU\TCATIO \S 4 \D MUNICiPkL RIGHTS -OFA� M Cammuivauons technology ins changing sea rapidly that the separate services that east today cull smn be a thing of the pee The bundWig of communcanons senores such as telephone cable broad band Interne is already happening Cores need to work u en cal government coabr o is ana the urecomn oaooaos utd, n to ensure the. contra u,d aomonn aver then nghu +a. and then rights to tax tell omrtiuncanons ssr v i,o Id, rabl, }mu udl hay, the opportune to learn what apprm:hzs edl be taken by teat ncx anmuusvanon and Cangrm m reguls"g and dire, lair - no M, issues and will N pro%ided u i h a local offi,ul end, or box to moue, min spar n-hn, of wz, PREEMPTiO\ lr MIA cities and towns on on, and last one on k, preemption baules Th, R,i Yiou, Land Ls, aid Insuwuonalad Person i, RLL I P I -a sievn,ant prmnpwo of lo,a zoora ac,hnrr. xv sr nod into lax But pressor, into Iu,si oW eras Id th, :coat, Jud e,ar [.omman. m all don , trots to pass m %cram, of aid ^z I,ei Lan that could irtl,ratrse Taal land us, r Learn how th, re oniciS land m, „i,uu r Lt Tt cities w _'001 and now lo.a au nrr t ar, " th, 107 th Congress THE DIGITU DR IDE Tchnolog% onto roiodibl, opp'irnirn , , aced communcanwn enhan,d pohh, il. a wonr and aa,v aces, to Pont, " tco and Pew mlormauon Govemnent ho.,,, ltd an a.r ail rol, in ensuring that all imencan, ha„ th, opnini. I run to learn and have aces to the advantages of high technologt \LC s Imesung m Commumnes agenda calls on the public and private sectors to uvrk together to clunmate the digital dnid, Learn about roles mponstbilates and opporriwtia for ensuring that techoolog% doesn t conic a cider gas benxn hoses and have nots in our cotnmurrues S\LJLRT GRORTH ',LC \ n, prendenr Karen %nderson is launching a tear long laws on budding qualm .ommurunes that udl address ken issues related to growth and deveopment in this nee eentun \k hat role "I C ongreas play in grouch and dadopm,nt nssw� affecting our communues'eland to uansprimuren eronottuc development and regtonal approa.hes to meet shared needs IOLTH � \DF4\BLIFS I , to . , ens, i, uk,1 m ,ran, a r id, r. e, =r i lrio aPa Gig ch,fd,,n yrurh and 11i6,. "m, of the muL that udl b on IN i, J,-a, ac, rda mJud, a, ulahht, of h,alth care ,w it om, tamiln, and ,hiloren reautho im i i- i tr, J,m,rtar, and s„oodar, edu.a n •� a -: tundoz for th, with robs pro,, h - + p -11 i add "„ ka roues tr„ ar tird,un,rtal m AI t , In,oune in t ammi.r w., ao,rJ, m,ludme sopponmz pea gams that are recognved for thou sum in devel opuig children and youth. s[tengthoung public -do cation and ensuring adequate o sourm to meet the basic needs of our families trcludmg health care and child we PRR 1CY fast stress in technology is inceaongiv raising questions about my access to enfdemal and per wa udortru ion It is also raising questions about what In el of government should make decenons about pined requiranents and how those require ments will affect local govammens parucularh expanded Labdnty Learn about eztstsng regulatwm that wrA bane an import on atlas and uan and other looming prawn requnefeents — that local officals should be aware of DURASTRUCTURE The fimste of our commumues depends on budding and reauntawng the Wraswauie best suited to then needs for the 21st cmtury — including transportation udrasmucture M% four mental infrastructure and union and enogv mGastructtrre Vatat Les ahead on the continuing public debate about electric utility deregulaoonr VAI Congress address conning wastewate infrastructure issues 111ut s likely in be on the agenda on lieu transportation issues including railroads wrier rier safety and other surface :g transportation issues' PUBLIC SAFETY Lod offrtails are fundamenraBy resportn ble for ensuring public safety in then commuri But the federal government on and should play a key role in support ing these efforts Key public safety cssua hkehy to be on the congressional agenda include n authonrztion of the acme bill and formula changes in the Lewd Lau Enforcement Block Grant which is a vital source of supplemental funding for local pubhc safm vutunves HOUSING The Investing in Communities agenda urges Congress to be a key player in the future of our communities by urreznng of the re ritalmtwn of eosung communtia and supporting the avadabtlin of affordable Iva andmmd erate -unrome housing both for homcownerslup and _ Most The 107th Canners could take up a range of housing issues such as federal wumves to incense t�ttt�a a the supply of affordable housing and federal funding for new production as cell as matching grants in state _ and local government for preservation 16 0 FUU,DAY SF.NEiARRS FRHK MARCH 9 TRl \4DR.vtlllOtlL IEIDER4� Sw.ts fDit nor 21sT Ceartw RrglnmmnF SIM Cm, Gmnpnm. Camemone ce s with dzesill,,duncecurepalup sac ens ,e P dim and tout,, m h an chance process, lot w,ll loam the prima clu and aof ,uamfommagcul lad'andure eft.h lodenlupgdsm become more zhevve N vow mie u a IoW lead' PamePanu wlll wdemuand ram traauto rul kadenshp pmv and mflueoce conmbure to pmfeawul auerm lot will do Ion rdmlquen to mptme sow sat« m tunung blockaea and ten m m mw Ied'dup oppommun lvnuam Carol. C \A H. NmW,, \eo, \.,.a Smk Ecx IL� tiro DE®o\ \L>.s1\G Pot ElrcrID Om17. 9a,am -'wpm Rrguammon Fee SIM Cmr Campeu-, Cad,' ,ua Thu utor.1 on dndopmIl the on� oaf g nratmc leadmlup aril ecd for madam, by datd of ,.1, It mmr,o us a lour hour a,meual oncue deo'd to hen, puuapadu detemmu, met, m &,dd state, leadenlup sole P..W. add gam an uodasundmg of he or m, of access ooenoaJ w meet„ go,,mute, m a logh chore, and <tullmgmg poi" emomn.t Thev u,ll a6o be abler w us, step svamai, leadershp and anal se• urg preens -muu tram commum.n Imo w, Carl \eu Lakewood Colorado AFTERNOONSEM ARS FMAx MARCH 9 E, U L \TL\G nor Ckmt F- UaTltE Omrsa J,Pm ,u,pm Regueanor Fee 395 Cu.a Lomp•m., C'm,m Wd heammoner Lhue elm,, olu. hl, I hold er dot ecvu,<ac.0 ,c ourhu,h'oa -,pct wrman,<amd Ne ig m, dud of Ne otga maauon . forg Ne duet ed came u fora¢,mmar for man,dmd oRh, nos omuur u dnlgnd w nplam N, .J ,11 helot m,mgannstrwuw fe mm,, and mu help mason and marts wnh,e, viporunt res , ..or Cho nn, no rout ws sesslom w i' gar a Id o wM Nee t.. p,[ Nd hOw Nn �n a,[ryl he Ix!Da[ Vin ,dad dunng m <ge P.,or .m The semmu evl engage mornpanu m err ate raw semen out porodmg todo"_u and o,."oceof ffiloj taedbrka N, nip un,,o oNKd vmuv Juba \oak Cr, \lamga R . \ I look Chna oe wren' CowJ,dme, b' Fon fnlWu Colorado How m \L� YOLR 4n 13tpet -, Mew - R,.00anm.F SIS Co+e Cmgermn Competent Pruvtoner Thal u vat oppomuun to gun skids wth a step by step ,w.e m desdop unplemem and naluam A markzwg Plan m stow.. wan Eamu,efirnemukeungmd ummwuoum smateme that lad "e,, nits rare, used mob. alum '"plan for the mnsca that then Doe and c.mun pm,sd, Pwopamhandouromeludethe \ LC Local Oliloils Gwde Hoa to 4mkzt lour Gn co sporuord bs 3C \I A stern w R•rhad UFine E:ar,m Diener 3C \Li Herndon CamJl, Azllogg Manager Alukemg 1 on %k .n hmaal Lagoa '(Gu Uashmgn.n DC LGC OFrxivs GLIDETO \if k RE ono\\ ) DJ P m -, OOP+ Regunano.Fre S95 Co+e Coepetmn Commuaueamr Tens hghs munef,, semNU wdl mach pmue ap. ho. to look and round them bast whm ddmg asN Ne medu T\ Dow and Dann -from mie deadop m' wsuaeDnd NIRVI .. 1. rill loo how w hudlle tough eta INS urrmm,e I.., and stoat � n hot wpla Also loo boa to d,,Jop ore mesaaga as WI u how to dress .e uar.t and g. w,eh enecw.mns mw *o %kao m, Auuh Commumacov \l ur i¢ton DC FUT JrDA SEMLVAR SATURDAY \LARCH 10 EfF i Lent G Swat 9 Guam - , Vfpm Rn m att. Fee 39, Can Le,t, , Commmurn., boor borne w a lean half of all lad and manage, ume u spent lemon, k.,1 ha. cram, Nee ere uum more than err other a: min ,wept breathing .d {<man ,alone ac ommeug for at lent a. ,,•tend or ow mmmutuaum Pauap tar lr, moon people move lees formal vaiunq m I veome skills dun ans oiler acorn or ull that the, uNme m them work and nenda, I,en Thu semuur 7 d devgn w prm,d, eve w,N both k..1 edge and pnnlW era,, to enhance you, Ctmu.ns as a leader b, desdopmg and Imrmed -e,ou us more slut. - \a,. a+ad�a \, d.�vl Cum Group T u .. (k,edapmm \Ian, -std \atom, Cum Group Trumma avf Ll-.Jopmm IJr.in, Vi m¢an MORN NG S W Ni ARS SATURDAX MARCH 10 RESw- %� Co\Ttjm CO \51L t Anaa\SLO - SIG \LL 9 n -Senn Regutronon Fee S95 Core Compeleru Cdlabow., Effeane mmmumotwo u the Idebleod of ever, td ...sh, that,00 hose and a sum, deal , of your success or fa ure In fact caul xsmuse enamor drat at least 7 S peat., of ill eNLtss stun from emmawom, srvle ddien o. As a umnpant to Nor workshop you ar1l d.ufy tools to st rofwtly redo¢ mile an L(e and unprme I. pafanaul d persolul aelauouhvpc Sou till aim deeelop aretegln to mourage others to be mote r:yuse to sow more, This engaging and fun program has been a fawnm among deed olTlaah from all leeelsa govemmmt la.0 e, Rlwnda HA,, Agreemelt D.. Inc aeaNe Uashrg,m AcS T,G SLC 1 k' ?L 3C BM OF✓wzcmRi LtsowNFRO\1 9 W am - Noon Rrglslrvnen Fee S93 Cmr Cmnpea.n f Inpnmt Pruavomr Puhhc Bonds of Diawn have a dFeten, aPermena and open,, m a dacrululg but workable msvaun.t mdav -op. r..,dc .pen meeon, eve ctuaau. ad media anardm Theseaora appinessu lesson form eff.o,,ol .6 to v ya o,unel41" you ap.fw ndlmgwa to elt.,rourperfamanceua PubIK Pond of Dlreaon Gm el,h..d Widen. and mor v to take cum bad home Immu,tm We Sued Heathrow Flonda WGH Wpl RfaAnov9iB STRVPlaR3 -PA I 9w0 , \mm Regutmnm Fee $93 tie Cmnprlmn C.mmmuomr Gun mvght row sow mouvamrs behae d amour as a,el u of thou arouM u faro lmv pasolatry tats mlluma the wee, you thud, plan bum. genmm Ides process mf.mlaum take ra4 ony out lob onloonvbdur. dal arth change and mnnae a nth people Ism the meta vry dement, of mom .. w build a sung coumvm on.. you and you omnw.n leseoctm Todd 4 vod Lou.,nik Amend, AFTERNOON SENENAR SATURDAx MARCH 10 $RLITIMLL LL3pF]LSIt� Fqt 11lGAL OfnO.3t5 Rgat,. anm Fee 395 Cmr uuame.. Comodupa Du sou kmw your lodenhy style and ram 'Art, dK people around You Tim gel .1 al that remulu der to teal local dand.Ifi Dais and gnaoroeot leaden to dunk dater erdy about Index up and sat umgw kadetshapar,le Aou%dlleamhoww adapt our ladadup mie to duffer., or. area and the perorpoon of othen dray nloe the desdopmmt Ind or yao mo .rent and or empiwee and men man,^ vowmiewtheunuu.n Puta,W.wII learn ulut'h ladmhap role u moor app Doom m dfHmnt.m.. The smuo. rµa up w,m a font mend train olto goal radung avnua aid peasow iron plain im haN, timer Travung oluuo- Gaoup Fat \ \aeM Indlara Tam CoLRAGE To UE - 12STEr3g1lE GIOLR Cm 1 30 pen -a W , . Regurreenm Fee S95 Gore Compsmn Gdm Leadmg vow an am be hen and prod", . e -you feel tour you are uukmq a then, Dry for wm.00w and to the future T., cement tacsea to nlupmng maven rd eunel m..bm to hose the mlrag, to I,td and pondmg sample pose techou un of lodenlup m maenad govammen Loo the duce duawwsan that ,terms, leaders hive m tanmon (11 AN Defmm - b�eurm that they an ecru, the lau e v uwav ulna doer. and. C Team Budding - bebne that one must desdop paten N order w a¢ampi.h gmla (3)Coodueor- beheve that the, need w uupnne alms w ere, to empm' .then m nuke dmvms lumrnme Lyle Sumek Heath. Flo" HIGat-L \m5 Rfi.l� SnmTEGmx -KRrR 130 Pna - S OOpi- Regumehou Fee S95 Core Compamnn Colhbooawr F.pand your bunt relauondup soils mnh smtegla and mob w dead uuh extreme behassnn ouch" kom tails ,mtec u uuma. bull. and .0 pmpl, to rune)uaafew Learnhowmtaenorthe wughm person beouu,.0 wsg bt arm,d w th daf g Deuce Nat cork' Gam th, abdnty w took Ilrsmd the ulmmos pert., mro that pople mast haw of oeh oNa Ded.p a bens undasureim, of the avegwhv valsnnsa and mot,aura,, of cut. Aloe mpoundv gam ate& wen host to ma, em, N.,W N ratsell and If. m vow.mmu., Todd Aramod Llusvdle hentu,k, Cottali to of Adun,mmt to LeadeNOp program dram bad elen,d officals to orgamee them pmftvwmul devel.pmml around mud skdls rem wary for eHeca a kad.%i p. live prd gram a built amurd bee con ladenhnp mmpeteocna for I e.l elected officals aslh web Ladershap Tnwng hutnute Semitar addreneng one of the followvlg (1) Co..., 12) C.mpttmt Pnctmonm Ifl Cummumeator Ill Cogab.nmc (5) Gil. +n 161 r QIMMW. .« 9 00 a m S OU p m Leadership Traimag humor Seminars > P p on h 30 p in Onertmon Session for Fin Tine lnmdees and \eu h Eleaed Officials i 30 p m 7 00 p m Consurumcv and apeaal Group \lemngs SATURDAY MARCH 10 900am 'OOpm NLC Board of Directors Meeting 900am sOupm \LC U,cwn Counnl \L<un¢ 0 00 a m > 00 p R Leadership Trauun, Inuaw, Jemuus 1000am \cor '001 Lnudu,e Bne., I Do p R 3 00 p,u Polo Commmee \lain" \ion • Human Development AHD • imormancn Tzchnolog and Commumanons Ro.r, n. \eranrlunc and Ln.K (ITC 7 •: pm • Energ% Emvenm.m and \alural Resources ,n a n ro a m (EE \R +hprr tIspm Polo Ciumrt.\ leames I a 14 a R • Comm.r, and Emmm.c Development \ocr I ICED • Traruponamn [nmo ,aure and Knees (TIS • Fiance {dnurcvm, on aril Inurgovemmeral Mario.I F{IR • PabL< Sum and C,,,, Pre%mnon (P-,CP, 00 p r Conti and rpa a Gro,.p \Im,," SUNDAY MARCH 11 A a r s w a y Sreennc Cc.101ce \Izeuree Cmnoal Secs err err (nrur ss,ow Pnanna • Human De%e,opmm HD \ion • INOrmauon Trrhnoiog and Commwuauons ITC Ro.r, n. \eranrlunc and Ln.K • Energ En,vomnz^ and \atura! Resourzes 7 •: pm (EE\R ,n a n ro a m anal Cmee Coun.0 -.mare C"arcner Vlerwg lu Man Cdzcra z Dnv u, I a 14 a R Genera! n¢,ion \ocr I Rourdublz \rm irk -, a: J L,.• Y Comr,.v err. ±E.Oran Cb.crmm, CED Y Tnr•mra o- In.asra. Aare and �zrvvca iTl� Y F.rave i..^ a or ay. Irteraove ^anenm Hlh *Pubes,s " and C" Preveruan'hCPI I , — G.�ea mss err or I- s, �c r Carnumnzs • ern r p— C'. wrc aid snY a. Grocp \Imes Emma 6 00 p ct - A p r Oper,rt Rmep on arc Emzrsm„mzr, MONDAY MARCH 12 9 N a in 10 30 a n Cmnoal Secs err err (nrur ss,ow Pnanna 10 • a m \ion G,ru, l szssion on {J,,v.nn.,cr Pnont zs 1 a• p m Ro.r, n. \eranrlunc and Ln.K 7 •: pm (arc_ •n. pm ""P- P m 6Ap^ Cons i mina '0uam 1000am fnude bus swum rarr,he \ \uh Amon Hetan to Capaal H d Exl%mormng cut<\lumvipal Leagur and Bnennas 9 00 a in I1 00 a in Roundnble �cxr, on Captol HJI Ww"Mil "IN Sunda), March 11 _ s CELEBRATE DIVERSITY BREAKFAST 830am. 1000am 'e Regutrotu rl fee W fW onsrm) Delegates and guests at CCC 2001 are mated to Celebrate Dsvasrty in Amass Crum and Tours at the 16th armual breakfast sponsarei by five NLC constituency groups Asun Pacific Amman MumcgW Officials (APANIO), Gay Lesbun and Bisexual Loaf Officials (GLBLO), Hispanic Elected laid Officials (HELO) National Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials (NBC/LEO), and Wamm in Mumapal Gavernmeat (WINfG) The breakfast will teattue a guest speaker who will pronde a perspective on issues facing lad olfwals and lmma s arms and towns CAPITOL STEPS Bark by popular demand the Capitol Steps will perform on Sunda% March I I 2001 at the Opening Reception It doesn't matter whether you are Demovral Independent or Republican this show is brpattsam_ (ten for evenoae DATES To REkamER February 2, 2001 Deadline for advance registration and housing requests All requests must be pwrmarked by this date After this date all delegates must register onsate at lather rates February 2, 2001 Deadline for nnmellations- Cancellation letters must b, postmarked b) the date and are subject to a $30 cancellation charge There are on refussds for arallanons after this date - - How To REGISTER To register for the 2001 Congressional City Conferma BB out the registration farm and return at with vow check am purchase order a aedst card udormation to the NLC Meeting Sen)ces posmnarked by February 2 2001 or register online at wvrw nle org • Each delegate, gum speaker member of the press, and anv other confer eme pamopant must register Thee rs a Ss0 with delegates fee There is no charge for press regtsvationn u uh proper press credenuals • No telephone registrations or cancellations will be accepted • Payment (check atv purchase orde- or credit card I must be included with advance n:gtsvauors • People unable to meet the Februan 2 deadline w dl hale to register onsne at the meeting and make their our hotel resenauons • Refunds will be mad, tar cancellations received bs February 2, 2001 sub jot to a $30 cancellation charge Cancellation letters must be postmarked b) dus date No telephone cancellations %ill be accepted No partial refunds will be made if you decide not in attend particular function I 6>1M_, * If you need hotel accommodations, please check the appropriate box on the regrstranon form * \ LC w dl make a hotel reservation for you when you register for the con ference * Rooms u dl be assigned an a fast came, fast served basis * ill conference sessions will be held at the Washington Hilton Howl 162 163 - - - - -r_ -- - - - - --- - - -- -------------- NLC CONGRESSIO\AI. CITY CONrERENCE REGISTRATION AND HOUSING FOR`I k�uhmgton Hilton Hotel and Tower a Washakgton, DC - March 413, 2001 Ad ance Regn'nnon Deadbne Febniar) 2.2001 a Onbne conFereoee regv=itonat hap / /www.nlc.org 10 hmomg or regutmhan wdl be prxerred wthoot aeoonpanymg payment m folL Me)o�a.Han aa,.al.Fwmad oRr,d OTHER atmrr GIRD L%TOP LLTIO\fwwx .wPnvn 4e.w a mouth dupaonc I Fast Omt mNerm¢ itmldect }®(S m once lmW W \.M+ Gei W tmm 0.e I nNObcormdertmsaHaad s�aFa� ,�,,,,,,,.„ I \one Sa I ioar _ Or, Or wauon oGmin Ob rPoLi.nmoi��...aw..m�.s ... MJm4 lddrm wREwmt o.a. ,�anBrms. w.tmao,•w o.s,.....m. Q� ®.ur�+e.rq.,• Gn Zp HOTEL ' Phone�� l mm>RESMATIO�&.mm.m�na�m,�te �'dW wPnunm. �a.aK1W Bmun.L EmaY _ nv�witlynetlmhmmWltredc \me C Place tnrke my hmd ea a a u uwared bdoe Jpou (5'I t C I do sm mgooe hood...damtu at m. of the holds Imd bdw Md \vole' 14 and wide no tx _ _ A4e ❑ Place -- off o,9 dmg case womuooa I \wsh Dae4ate \.I 11, IS Sh tee A4e RkffiFATIONRFgLtsFL\FUR \L177(T\ •4d uFau.mmwua aqe �PU.m. v,-�.. .am :wm�wn.o\IC.wr ua un Amo D¢ —/ D nak g 1 bd ._ Jmakmq Soubi( (pcsotd Dwbie (2 bd' �. \m Jmokmg SPE CoRFFREI� R.TLS C Doublrrpouble ('- FaFk /' bedc) o bk (2I 11 S 11 520 Jpaase'Guen Inca .rhmdaWel $ GI 5.0 loath Delegate $ SPEQ.LL HOL'SL\G REQLTm (rr aherrWve aamtde rmms. rte) H15,3 }wsh Clupcm.�rolapPll.abr so rixutofi ws $ ©If)w hale sR dhoom40r vuup noo reds piece mmn \LC \kung I sen,m AM{ \u RmsmkT10\ FEES(Posma.bedb Tbn 2 mol) I AU Be Shanng\I) R. Wi h C2 560 \LCNML Ai.'mba-• $ Co-o¢ t I,. J D.'S760 Assma¢llenbe -• 3 C E2 P60 SW Klwber• $ uawe•d.. .r.ewimm.®em. m.os e.. nr.e.�•..e•my.w ❑ E2 SAS \. Mertes Otke-••• S �+•T O<..'.m .n o. L,EADERSHiP TRnL\L\G L\SfTIL -IE $E.LL\11tS fFMw ifarrh91oo1) L�w'6fdm�nN Terly 1 ArLe Grub lmbo Ze'I�aadidw{.des B' EI>0 Trmaamuomd l- aderslup J4Ju tw e4: is` CenNr. $ _ B_ $1,0 Jo om, Lada rr, S Dimon \laa_i. Eis� Offs ah $ coot HOM s UDK otol¢ HOr[I. sewer - C' S9• Evdmwe thr Cha E..-mo,r Or, 3 I' — \� IN is L _ Hsemxaa uu ias _ ( -5+, Houo\IVea lom Cm S 'B Hr 1u a sr, _ US+, L,, Gln..af, GWa, to .l.dll R,,i. $ is _XUa K.M;m NUG ne 1 _B�luu6lW r1i 1L LEI sE wTRV\i\G L\srra-IE SEMmRS(Sanurdo+ )famh io 2001 1 t'sa -eo J _p. ®uMbu Hs-u _ = D $1,0 Enern.e Lumvrs Jkd,. 3 m_txd.. umnu a _nyex.b, n« n E' $4 Raolnns Card'um ionmum.u,ai w.ceu.uws 5 It —Rol, y,� su,u ,�_nweo,lxa u, H _ E1 S90 lchaon wR 4 Pa- Buu-P, 'r — FanK.a.,iw, x«a $i= h EJ 5+ Htgn Impan ReanotW,p �mtma - Par I $ moc I F 5, Awuo v aaa F for Lail On„ia, E Hum D paci Lvomtlna = F Sa Tnr Caoasrm Lao- - tr io lrun3loW l,�n 3 111 ttu1N aedls andsare"oodna. muaaa Fad. AU deli rom'm'^n cmd'•+e aJei _ F, S, h,en lmya kruuowu: vnl...5 Par II $ .a,ctwud.mu vvahvbnuvd vdpWmme lad NLRKFEAnpam.ar.mal +rvl aR V,btm mxaa aPa..l SPEB E% _ B S GLKF� S 5.,�.,n Fn g Refs, rRe¢RFr'srltAra.4\v Htxa\c FORatTv _ CI S- HELO v -�.m Fa y HELD IC F. %auluae odut.d E] b \P/] LEO R.uFnor b nnean od.a od. Nd — GI S o \l1 \IG Lwl,hmn \5nsrwa _ H, S' Julula, Co,brate DP.ersm Br..J4 n (PoHmuked b1 212101) 3 &al A—,e TOT \L REGISTR \TIO \FEE 5 It =t2 .r�O Hod I lnrr Fmnw : •lhate tee Sra� ^(Ta t. Fn S,J, •••lRSllt Fen 3,J. 3m la Fvta...1 mn REGmRmo\ PmmEN7 L\TOR\L1T10\ LIL ST BE CHECKED FOR HOTEL RESER%ITIO\I FUR.tpRE L \TOR\L,TM]A. c} R, m. REGFTRAT(\ \FEE v iv .la{ or\1ur,d h,ud hlw pa mrtcauamuwalr t, REGI,TR1T10\ FEE m d, p n h m \.,rood Lo.,o.f Cntm I _ Pur.has. (hde tar REGI,TR4Tk1\ FEES rust n s. , F, m shr gvrhu. ands "k ""'r"°if1OA'�R'rr"aa` HOTEL U.w r, HOT LDEKN7T — (noses MOTELEPO(i tom. _da ad mod n.,. Chedmr HOTEL rnn duet thole; _ Pwcnue Order,, HOTEL DEP( *IT isuoma Juet1 HOTEL I CREW CARD FHORrzAno\ ��► L-- ' r ® �iI ®l� ' OMEN 163