Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
2001 JAN 16 CC PACKET4
F
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street
The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda Items
Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City- related business that Is within the jurisdiction of the
City Council and/or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portion of the Meeting Additionally, the
Public can comment on any Public Hearing item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing portion of such item The time limit for
comments is five (5) minutes per person
Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state Your name and residence and the organization you
represent, if desired Please respect the time limits
Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's
Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2 00 p in the prior Tuesday) The request must include a brief
general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be
permitted during meetings if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not
exceed five (5) minutes in length
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 524 -2305
Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 16,2001 - 5:00 P.M.
Next Resolution # 4201
Next Ordinance # 1330
5.00 PM Session
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
Appoint Mary Strenn, City Manager, as real property negotiator for Parcel No 6 of Parcel
May 17750 (the parking lot in front of the West Basin plant on Sepulveda Boulevard)
Recommendation - Discussion and possible action.
Ui)i
CLOSED SESSION:
The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act
(Government Code §54950, et sec ) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator;
and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation, and/or discussing matters
covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel), and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as
follows
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956 9(a))
1 City of El Segundo v. Bd of Airport Commissioners, et al, LASC Case No BC 220609
2 Hill v El Segundo, USDC No CV 98- 1463- LGB(SHX)
3 Phillips Petroleum, et al v County of Los Angeles, et al, USDC No 1938 -MRP (MANx)
4 Shell Chemical Company, et al v County of Los Angeles, et al, USDC No 1917 -GHK (RCx)
5 Jeffrey Capistran v El Segundo, LASC Case No YC 038535
6 In re Randall's Island Family Golf, Case No OOB41065 (SMB)
7 Lucas v El Segundo, LASC Case No L04721
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956 9(b) -I- potential case (no further public
statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956 9(c) -2- matters
DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) — None.
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957 6) —
City Representative Mary Strenn, City Manager Employee Organizations City Employees' Association
and Supervisory & Professional Employees' Association
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956 8) — Meeting with real
property negotiator Mary Strenn regarding Parcel No. 6 of Parcel Map 17750 (the parking lot in front of the
West Basin plant on Sepulveda Boulevard)
002
Cq
AGEND]
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street
The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda Items
Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City- related business that is within the jurisdiction of the
City Council and/or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portion of the Meeting Additionally, the
Public can comment on any Public Heating item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing portion of such item The time limit for
comments is five (5) minutes per person
Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state Your name and residence and the organization you
represent, if desired Please respect the time limits
Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's
Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2 00 p m the prior Tuesday) The request must include a brief
general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be
permitted during meetings if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not
exceed five (5) minutes in length
to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 524 -2305
Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2001 - 7:00 P.M.
Next Resolution # 4201
Next Ordinance # 1330
7:00 PM Session
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION —
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Council Member Nancy Wernick
PRESENTATIONS
(a) Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to recipients and fudges of "2000 Lighting Up the
Community Program "
ROLL CALL
003
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business On1Y - 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and
employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identtfy themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a
misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250 Whale all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any
item not on the agenda The Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed
(b) Request by Andrea Dahm, on behalf of El Segundo Little League, for City approval to close
certain City streets for its annual opening day parade from 9 00 a in to 11 00 a in on
Saturday, March 3, 2001 (See Consent item #8)
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only
Recommendation - Approval.
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS -
Public hearing on the proposed projects and budget for allocation of the Fiscal Year 2001-
2002 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds Proposed total Fiscal Year
2001 -2002 CDBG budget $220,058 (Proposed Community Development Commission CDBG
2001 -2001 Allocation - $111,618, Community Development Commission Unallocated CDBG
Funds - $75,000, General Fund monies - $33,440)
Recommendation —
a) Hold public hearing;
b) Discussion;
c) Consider proposed projects and budget, and direct staff accordingly;
d) Authorize the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services to
execute agreements with the Community Development Commission; and,
e) Authorize the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services to
execute agreements in excess of $10,000 with all sub - recipients receiving CDBG
funds.
2 Ordinance to revise Title 6 of the El Segundo Municipal Code regarding animal control
Recommendation —
a) Introduce ordinance.
b) Schedule second reading and adoption for February 6, 2001.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS —
Water Well Project Report presentation by RBF
Recommendation — Discussion and /or possible direction to staff.
004
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
4. Announce appointments to the Camp Eucalyptus Task Force and set first meeting thereof
Recommendation —
a) Announce appointments.
b) Set first meeting of Camp Eucalyptus Task Force.
Review Recreation and Parks Commission recommendation on proposed Skate Park location
Recommendation — Approve proposed skate park location.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously If a call for
discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business
6 Warrant Numbers 2514652- 2514924 on Register No 6 in total amount of $625,243 32, Wire
Transfers in the amount of $1,142,419 94, Warrant Numbers 2514925- 2515155 on Register
No 7 in total amount of $724,014 82, and Wire Transfers in the amount of $284,846 00
Recommendation - Approve Warrant Demand Register and Authorize staff to release.
Ratify: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or
agreements; emergency disbursements and /or adjustments; and wire transfers from
12 /09 /00 to 01/05101.
City Council meeting minutes of December 19, 2000
Recommendation - Approval.
Request by Andrea Dahm, on behalf of El Segundo Little League, for City approval to close
certain City streets for its annual opening day parade from 9 00 a m to 11 00 a m on
Saturday, March 3, 2001. (Fiscal impact $460)
Recommendation — Approve request, provided the event meets all applicable City
requirements.
A resolution of the City Council of the City of El Segundo adopting a schedule of fees for
work or encroachment in the public nght -of -way (no fiscal impact)
Recommendation — Adopt resolution.
10 Agreement for Professional Services between Moreland & Associates, Inc and the City of
El Segundo to provide accounting services during a staff leave of absence in the Accounting
Division of the Finance Department
Recommendation — Approve Agreement for Professional Services between Moreland &
Associates, Inc. and the City of El Segundo.
11 Municipal Area Express (MAX) Capital Reserve MOU Amendment
Recommendation — Adopt and execute the MAX Capital Reserve MOU Amendment.
005
12 Establishment of a professional service contract with Christopher A Joseph and Associates
(CAJA) to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a proposed mixed -use project
on a 46 5 acre property bounded by Mariposa Avenue, Nash Street, Atwood Way, and
Douglas Street The amount to be paid to the consultant under this agreement is $116,850 00
The full amount of the contract will be paid by the applicant of the project
Recommendation —
a) Approve a professional services contract with CAJA to prepare an EIR.
b) Authorize staff to increase contract by $8,500 if additional traffic counts are
required; and,
c) Authorize a ten percent contingency increase in the contract if unanticipated
analysis is needed.
13 Proposal to purchase one police canine, support equipment and all related training
Recommendation — Approve purchase of new canine and all related support items on a
sole - source vendor basis.
14 Revocable Lease Agreement between the City of El Segundo and New York Food Company
to lease a portion of City property at 630 South Douglas Street (monthly revenue of $618 50)
Recommendation — Approve the Revocable Lease Agreement and authorize the Mayor
to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.
15 Adoption of Plans and Specification for the lining of sanitary sewer access structures at
various locations — Protect PW No. 00 -18 (estimated cost $60,000 00)
Recommendation —
a) Adopt plans and specifications.
b) Authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids.
16 Adoption of Ordinance No 1329 which implements the standard urban storm water
mitigation plan of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Los Angeles
region by amending the El Segundo Municipal Code Chapter 6 28, "Standard Urban Storm
Water Mitigation Plan Implementation" (no fiscal impact)
Recommendation —
a) Second reading and adoption of Ordinance, by title only; and /or
b) Other possible action /direction.
17 Award of annual concrete contract to C J Construction, Inc for P C C Curb, Curb & Gutter,
sidewalk and other minor improvements Public Works Project #PW 00 -14, total contract
amount $50.000 00
Recommendation —
a) Award contract to the lowest bidder, C. J. Construction, Inc. (see Bid Sheet).
b) Authorize the Mayor to sign the standard Public Works construction agreement
after approval as to form by the City Attorney.
006
is Recommendation for approval of the 2000/2001 proposed vehicle and equipment purchases in
the amount of $206,410 00. Funds approved and available in the 2000/2001 Equipment
Replacement Fund
Recommendation — Authorize the staff to solicit bids and award contracts to the lowest
responsible bidder, purchase designated equipment, and dispose of all identified surplus
vehicles and equipment at auction.
19 Acceptance of the lining of sanitary sewer access structures — Prod ect No PW 00 -12 (final
contract amount = $62,460 39).
Recommendation —
a) Accept the work as complete.
b) Authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the
County Recorder's Office.
20 Application to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (MTA) 2001
Recommendation — Authorize staff to submit an application for the conversion of the
Nash Street - Douglas Street one -way system to a two -way street system (estimated cost:
$1.65 million).
21 Examination plans for the Personnel Ment System tob classification of Senior Planner
Recommendation — Approve the Examination Plans.
CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA
F. NEW BUSINESS —
22 Presentation by Kilroy Coporahon regarding application to the Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (MTA) 2001 Call for Projects — Imperial Highway
(southside) Streetscane Enrichment Protect, between Nash Street and Pershing Drive
Recommendation — After Kilroy Corporation's presentation of this Imperial Highway
landscape project, the Council may authorize staff to submit an application for the MTA
2001 Call for Projects. (Estimated project cost = $1.6 million — Local Agency Match,
which can include funds from public and private sources = $320,000).
G. REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - NONE
H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY - NONE
L REPORTS - CITY CLERK - NONE
J. REPORTS - CITY TREASURER - NONE
K. REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member McDowell - NONE
007
Council Member Gaines —
23 Discussion of ongoing electrical power issues
Recommendation — Discussion and/or possible direction to staff.
Council Member Wernick —
24 Request to determine Council interest in and representation at the National League of
Cities' Congressional City Conference 2001 entitled "Investing in Communities —
Investing in America's Future," to be held March 9 -13, 2001 in Washington, D C
Recommendation — Discussion and /or possible direction to staff.
Mayor Pro Tem Jacobs - NONE
Mayor Gordon — NONE
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals who have
received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalfofanother, and employees speaking on behadfof their employer,
must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250
While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda The Council will respond
to comments after Public Communications is closed
MEMORIALS — Adjournment in memory of retired City employee George Greene and resident Bob
Bramhall
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act
(Government Code Sec 54960, et seq ) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property
Negotiator, and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation, and/or discussing
matters covered under Government Code section 54957 (Personnel), and/or conferring with the City's Labor
Negotiators, as follows
Continuation of matters listed on the City Council Agenda for 5 00 p in , January 16, 2001 under "Closed
Session" (if needed)
REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required)
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED
DATE e, i o o I
TIME
NAM
01 1601a
00 8
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Special Order of Business - Public Hearing
AGENDA DESCRIPTION
Public hearing on the proposed projects and budget for allocation of the Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds Proposed total Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 CDBG budget $220,058 (Proposed
Community Development Commission CDBG 2001 -2002 Allocation- $111,618, Community Development Commission
Unallocated CDBG Funds — $75,000 General Fund monies - $ 33,440)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Hold public hearing,
2) Discussion,
3) Consider proposed projects and budget, and direct staff accordingly,
4) Authorize the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services to execute agreements with the
Community Development Commission, and,
5) Authorize the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services to execute agreements in excess
of $10,000 with all sub - recipients receiving CDBG funds
NTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUN
Each year, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are allocated to cities by the Federal Housing and
Urban Development Department (HUD) and administered through the Los Angeles County Community Development
Commission (CDC) Participating cities receive funding based upon the total number of cities participating in the
County's program, and a city's commitment to provide housing, economic, social service, and community development
opportunities which principally benefit persons of low and moderate income levels There will be little or no change
in CDBG funding levels from last year
DISCUSSION
Since 1986, the City of El Segundo has annually participated in the Los Angeles Urban County's CDBG Program In
order to continue its participation in the upcoming 2001 -2002 program year, which begins on July 1, 2001 and ends
on June 30, 2002, the City of El Segundo must prepare and submit its proposed CDBG project descriptions to the
Community Development Commission by February 1, 2001, for review and approval
(Continued on next page)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
1) Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 estimated CDBG allocation — Los Angeles County Community Development Commission,
FISCAL IMPACT
Operating Budget CDBG /General Fund /CDBG Unallocated
Amount Requested $111,618 CDBG 01 -02 / $33,440 (General Fun
Project/AccountBudget
Project/Account Balance* Date Fiscal Year 2001 -2002
Account Number: CDBG - Fund 111 / Gen Fund - 001
Project Phase N/A
Appropriation Required - Yes_ No _X
ORIGINATED Date. January 10, 2001
James M Hansen, Director'of Community, Eco&mic and Development Services
REVIEWED BY Date
'
M ry Strenn, ttv Manaoer �G i
ACTION T
010 1
DISCUSSION. (Continued)
Pursuant to Federal requirements, notice of this public hearing was posted in various public buildings within the City
Federal requirements also mandate that as part of the hearing, the Council and public be informed of the range of
eligible housing and community development activities that may be funded under the CDBG program Interested
persons may obtain a copy of the Federal eligibility guidelines, available at the City of El Segundo's Department of
Community, Economic and Development Services, from 7 30 a m to 5 30 p m Monday through Friday
Proposed 2001 -2002 CDBG Proiects and Budget
The proposed 2001 -2002 CDBG allocation for the City of El Segundo is $111,618 However, this is a planning estimate
only, the Los Angeles County Community Development Commission (CDC) does not receive the final appropnabon from
HUD until Spring 2001 The City's final CDBG allocation may be more or less than the planning estimate Generally,
however, the final allocation is within ten percent of the estimate provided
The 2001 -2002 CDBG program year may operate within a 25% public service limit (for the 2001 -2002 Program Year
only), and a 10% General Administration limit as mandated by the Federal regulations Twenty -five percent of the City's
annual CDBG allocation for 2001 -2002 equals approximately $27,900 Thus, a maximum of $27,900 in CDBG funds
may be cumulatively expended on all public service projects Since the City of El Segundo typically devotes a total of
$56,500 annually to its CDBG public service projects which include Home Delivered Meals, Senior In -Home Care and
Juvenile Diversion, supplemental funds totaling $28,600 must be identified in order to maintain existing public service
project levels Similarly, ten percent of the City s 2001 -2002 allocation is $11,160 CDBG administrative services have
intensified due to changes in the Federal reporting and management requirements Thus, in order to maintain existing
CDBG management services, General Fund monies totaling $4,840 will be required to supplement the 2001 -2002
CDBG Administration Therefore, the total General Fund Supplement for 2001 -2002 equals $33,440 There will be little
or no change in CDBG costs for the 2001 -2002 Program Year
The General Fund Supplement was adopted as part of the City of El Segundo's Fiscal Year 2000 -2001 Final Operating
Budget
A complete list of the proposed CDBG 2001 -2002 projects and budgets are
General Fund
Total Budget CDBG Allocation Supplement
Home Delivered
Meals (Public Service) $16,000 $9,300 $ 6,700
Under a continuing public service agreement with Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital,
approximately 5,000 meals are delivered to El Segundo low and moderate income elderly and
severely handicapped persons annually Additional revenues of approximately $9,000 in
donations are anticipated This increases the total budget to $25,000
Senior In -Home
Care (Public Service)
$24,500 $9,300 $15,200
Under a continuing public service agreement with Just Right Help, Inc, approximately 600
home visits are made annually to El Segundo low and moderate income elderly and severely
handicapped persons
Juvenile Diversion
(Public Service)
$16,000 $9,300 $ 6,700
Under a continuing public service agreement with the South Bay Youth Project, approximately
400 counseling service hours are provided by licensed family therapists to El Segundo at -risk
youth
011
Total Budget CDBG Allocation General Fund Supplement
Minor Home Repair $72,500 $72,500 0
The Minor Home Repair project provides financial assistance to qualified low and moderate
income, single family, owner - occupied condominium and homeowners to make necessary
minor home improvements No interest, deferred loans up to $7,500 may be approved for
minor home improvements Additionally, recent changes in the federal CDBG regulations now
require every housing rehabilitation project to comply with federal lead -based paint
identification and remediation Thus, in conjunction with no- interest, deferred loans, eligible
homeowners will be offered direct grants to compensate for the costs associated with lead -
based paint hazard evaluation and reduction requirements
Administration
(max 10 %) $16,000 $11,160 $4,840
Public Facilities and Improvements — City Hall West Handicapped Accessible Elevator
$200,000 $75,000 ($125,000 (City- budgeted CIP) not included in total
General Fund Supplement)
CDBG funds will pay for a portion ($75,000 of the $200,000 total cost) of the construction costs
associated with the installation of a new handicapped accessible elevator in City Hall west
Unspent funds from previous program years' closed -out projects totaling $ 75,000 are available
for reallocation to new or continuing eligible CDBG projects These unspent, unallocated
CDBG funds exist in a "contingency' account held by the Los Angeles County Community
Development Commission and the City may apply for the funds for eligible CDBG projects
Any unexpended funds at the end of the program year are not lost, they are "rolled over" into
the next budget year for reprogramming (public service projects, such as Home Delivered
Meals, Senior In -Home Care, Juvenile Diversion, and CDBG General Administration are
excluded from these reallocated funds) Certain public improvement projects that remove
architectural barriers for severely handicapped and elderly persons are eligible under the
CDBG guidelines Thus, the installation of a handicapped accessible elevator in City Hall west
complies with the CDBG regulations
cdbecl
012
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
AGENDA HEADING: Special Matter
Ordinance to revise Title 6 of the El Segundo Municipal Code regarding animal control
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1 Introduce ordinance
2 Schedule reading and adoption for February 6, 2001
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
On October 17, 2000, City Council gave staff the go ahead to proceed with the new animal
control project As the project moves forward, staff has reviewed the current animal control
sections of the El Segundo Municipal Code
Revision and drafting of ordinances have taken place These changes are essential for the
new project to proceed ahead
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Proposed ordinance
FISCAL IMPACT-
Operating Budget:
None
Amount Requested:
None
Account Number:
None
Project Phase:
Appropriation required:
None
TED: n DATE: January 10,
mmond, ChieTdf Police
REVIEWED Y• DATE:
Ma r , i y anager 4/
i
I�
1/10/01 1 46 51 3
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 6 OF THE
EL SEGUNDO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ANIMAL CONTROL
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA,
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1 Title 6 of the El Segundo Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows
CHAPTER1
COUNTY REGULATIONS
SECTION
6 -1 -1 Incorporation of Title 10, Los Angeles County Code
6 1 1 INCORPORATION OF TITLE 10, LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CODE Title 10 of the Los Angeles Code, with the
exception of title 10, section 10 90.010 (VI) and section
10 90 010 (VII) is hereby incorporated into the City Code
To the extent any provision of the Los Angeles Code
Incorporated hereby is inconsistent with some other
provision of this code, the later provision shall be
controlling Incorporation of title 10 including section
10 04 060 which states
A Any person violating any of the provisions of this title is guilty of an
infraction unless another penalty is provided for in this title
B Violation of sections
10 12 190
10 12 200
10 20 280
10 20 310
10.28 060
10 32.020
10 32 070
10.32.080
10 37 030
10 37 050(c)
10 37 060(f)
10 40 010
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 1 014
10 40.040
10 86.010
of this title is a misdemeanor (Ord 90 -0089, 1990 Ord. 89 -0166,
1989, Ord 87 -0191 16, 1987, Ord 83 -0043 1, 1983; Ord 9454 1
(part), 1967, Ord 4729 Art 1 108, 1946)
(Ord 1274, 6 -16 -1997)
CHAPTER
ANIMALS
SECTION
62 1 Animals Permitted
622 Animals Prohibited
6 2 3 Animals At Large
6 2 4 Animal Care
62 5 Public Nuisance
6 2 6 Permits Required
6 2 7 Application For Permit
6 2 8 Criteria For Approval
6 2 9 Expiration Of Permits
6 2 10 Appeal Decision Of Director, Fee
6 2 11 Planning Commission Hearing, Notice, Decision
6 2 12 Grounds For Revocation
6 2 1 ANIMALS PERMITTED
A Generally It shall be lawful for any person to keep or maintain or
have in possession or under control in the City the following
animals
1 Canaries, pigeons, doves or birds of the psittacine family
kept as household pets or as a hobby only, not exceeding
ten (10) in number, when kept in facilities that are humane
and adequate as to noise, sanitation and security-
2 Fish and turtles kept as household pets or as a hobby only,
3 Hamsters, white rates or guinea pigs as household pets or
as a hobby only, not exceeding ten (20) in the aggregate and
the young thereof not exceeding three (3) months in age,
(Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972)
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 2
015
4 Hen chickens, kept as household pets or as a hobby, not to
exceed five (5) in number when kept in facilities that are
humane and adequate as to noise, sanitation and security,
(Ord. 825, 11 -20 -1973)
5 Rabbits as household pets or as a hobby only, not
exceeding four (4) in number and the young thereof not
exceeding four (4) months in age,
6 In one - family and two - family dwellings or duplexes, dogs and
cats not to exceed three (3) for each residential living unit in
any combination thereof and the young thereof not
exceeding four (4) months in age,
7 In dwelling units other than one - family and two - family
dwellings or duplexes, one dog or cat per unit and the young
thereof not exceeding four (4) months in age,
8 Except in residential districts, dogs used for guard or sentry
purposes (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972)
B Circus All animals enumerated in this Chapter may be kept within
the City in connection with any circus, carnival or wild west show, or
in conjunction with any parade for which a permit has been issued,
provided, however, that without the approval of the Director of
Community, Economic and Development Services, animals may
not be brought Into the City more than twenty four (24) hours before
the first performance of the circus, carnival or wild west show or the
start of the parade, as the case may be, nor may animals be kept
within the City without the approval of the Director of Community,
Economic and Development Services for more than twenty four
(24) hours after the conclusion of the last performance of a circus,
carnival or wild west show or within twenty four (24) hours after the
conclusion of a parade
C Laboratory All animals enumerated in this Chapter may be kept
within the City in connection with a laboratory that holds a valid
clinical laboratory permit issued by the State Department of Health
D School All animals enumerated in this Chapter may be kept within
the City in a public or private school license by the State (Ord
790, 7 -24 -1972, amd Ord 1315, 1 -18 -2000)
6 2 2 ANIMALS PROHIBITED Except as provided in subsections 6 -2 -113, C,
and D of this Chapter, no person shall keep or maintain or have in his possession
or under his control any poisonous or venomous snake or any wild, carnivorous
animal (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972)
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 3 O
6 2 3 ANIMALS AT LARGE It is unlawful for any person owning or having
possession, charge, custody or control of any animal or fowl to cause, permit or
allow the same to stray or run, or in any other manner to be at large in or upon
any public highway, street, avenue, roadway, road, way, lane, alley, park.,
square, sidewalk or other public place in the City, or in or upon any unenclosed
lot, land or premises, or to stake out, herd or graze any animal or fowl upon any
unenclosed lot, land or premises in such manner that the rope or other
attachment by which the same is tethered may permit it to be or to go beyond the
boundary of the lot, land or premises, provided, however, that the provisions of
this Section shall not apply in the case of animals lawfully upon the public
highway, street, road, roadway, avenue, way, lane, alley, park, square, sidewalk
or other public place and which are temporarily hitched to hitching weights,
devices or posts at the curb or side of the highway, road, roadway, street, lane,
park, square, sidewalk, way, avenue, alley or place, or which are otherwise
located therein (Ord 431, 1 -27 -1954)
6 2 4 ANIMAL CARE
Requirements for owners and kennel operators Every person, within the City,
who owns any animal or who owns, conducts, manages or operates any kennel
for which a permit is required by this title, shall comply with each of the following
conditions
A Housing facilities for animals shall be structurally sound and shall
be maintained in good repair, to protect the animals from injury, to
contain the animals, and to restrict the entrance of other animals
B All animals shall be supplied with sufficient good and wholesome
food and water as often as the feeding habits of the respective
animals require
C All animals and all animal buildings or enclosures shall be
maintained In a clean and sanitary condition
D All animals shall be so maintained as to eliminate excessive and
nighttime noise
E No animals shall be without attention more than 12 consecutive
hours Whenever an animal is left unattended at a kennel, the
telephone number of the police department, or the name, address
and telephone number of the responsible person, shall be posted in
a conspicuous place at the front of the property
F Every reasonable precaution shall be used to insure that animals
are not teased, abused, mistreated, annoyed, tormented or in any
manner made to suffer by any person or means.
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING SSMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 4
01i
G No condition shall be maintained or permitted that is or could be
injurious to the animals
H Animal buildings and enclosures shall be so constructed and
maintained as to prevent escape of animals. All reasonable
precautions shall be taken to protect the public from the animals
and the animals from the public
Every animal establishment shall isolate sick animals sufficiently so
as not to endanger the health of other animals Sick animals shall
at all times be isolated from the other animals.
J Every budding or enclosure wherein animals are maintained shall
be constructed of material easily cleaned and shall be kept in a
sanitary condition The budding shall be properly ventilated to
prevent drafts and to remove odors Heating and cooling shall be
provided as required, according to the physical need of the animals,
with sufficient light to allow observation of animals and sanitation
K Such person shall take any animal to a veterinarian for examination
or treatment, If the director finds this is necessary in order to
maintain the health of the animal and orders the owner or custodian
to do so
L All animal rooms, cages, kennels and runs shall be of sufficient size
to provide adequate and proper accommodations for the animals
kept therein
M Every violation of an applicable regulation shall be corrected within
a reasonable time to be specified by the Chief of Police.
N Such person shall provide proper shelter and protection from the
weather at all times
O Such person shall not give an animal any alcoholic beverage,
unless prescribed by a veterinarian
P Such person shall not allow animals that are natural enemies,
temperamentally unsuited, or otherwise incompatible, to be
quartered together, or so near each other as to cause injury, fear or
torment If two or more animals are so trained that they can be
placed together and do not attack each other or perform or attempt
any hostile act to the others, such animals shall be deemed not to
be natural enemies
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMALCONTROL
PAGE NO 5 O l d
Q Such person shall not allow the use of any tack, equipment, device,
substance or material that is, or could be, injurious or cause
unnecessary cruelty to any animal
R Such person shall not allow any animal to cause a hazard, or be a
menace to the health, peace or safety of the community
6 2 5 PUBLIC NUISANCE
A Any animal (or animals) which molests passersby or passing
vehicles, attacks other animals, trespasses on school grounds, is
repeatedly at large, damages and or trespasses on private or public
property, barks, whines or howls in an excessive, continuous or
untimely fashion, shall be considered a public nuisance.
B Every person who maintains, permits or allows a public nuisance to
exist upon his or her property or premises, and every person
occupying or leasing the property or premises of another and who
maintains, permits or allows a public nuisance as described above
to exist thereon, after reasonable notice in writing from the City has
been served upon such person to cease such nuisance, is guilty of
an infraction The existence of such nuisance for each and every
day after the service of such notice shall be deemed a separate
and distinct offense
6 2 6 PERMITS REQUIRED
A Compliance, Permit It shall be unlawful for any person to keep or
maintain, or have in possession or under control in the City, any
living member of the animal kingdom except human beings, except
as permitted by this Chapter and without having applied for and
received a permit as hereinafter provided
B Permit For Keeping Animals Any person may keep animals other
than or in excess of the animals enumerated in subsection 6.2 1A
of this Chapter and may keep the animals enumerated in Section
6 2.2 of this Chapter in the circumstances described in subsections
6 2 1 B, C and D of this Chapter by securing a permit for the
keeping of such animals (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972)
6 2 7 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT An application for a permit shall be initiated
by filing a verified application on a form furnished by the Director of Community,
Economic and Development Services stating fully the applicant's name, address,
and telephone number, the number and kind of animals for which a permit is
requested, the number and kind of other animals kept on the premises; the type
ORDINANCE NO _
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 6 Cj
and location of caging, if applicable, and other Information required by the
Director of Community, Economic and Development Services upon receipt of the
application The Director of Community, Economic and Development Services
shall make or cause to be made such Investigation as he deems appropriate
(Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972, amd Ord 1315, 1 -18 -2000)
6.2 8 CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL The Director of Community, Economic and
Development Services shall Issue or renew the permit If he finds-
A That the Issuance of such permit will not adversely affect the public
peace, health or safety,
B That the keeping of such animal will not violate any provision of
law, and
C That the facilities for keeping such animals are humane and
adequate under the circumstances as to noise, security and
sanitation (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972, amd Ord 1315, 1 -18 -2000, 2000
Code)
6 2 9 EXPIRATION OF PERMITS All permits issued on or before October 31
of any year shall expire on December 31 of that year. Any permit issued on or
after November 1 of any year shall expire on December 31 of the next
succeeding year (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972)
6 2 10 APPEAL DECISION OF DIRECTOR, FEE Any person dissatisfied with
the decision of the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services
may file an appeal of such decision with the Planning Commission by filing a
written notice of appeal in letter form accompanied by a fee of twenty five dollars
(a25 00), said fee to cover the cost of posting, postage, advertising and other
costs Incident to the proceedings Said notice of appeal may be filed at any time
after the decision of the Director of Community, Economic and Development
Services has been made, provided, however, that an appeal may not be filed on
the granting of such permit after ten (10) days have expired from the action of the
Director of Community, Economic and Development Services in granting such
permit (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972, amd Ord 1315, 1 -18 -2000)
6 2 11 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING, NOTICE: DECISION:
A Hearing Notice When an appeal is filed, the Director of
Community, Economic and Development Services shall give notice
of a public hearing by mailing a letter notice, first class mad with
postage prepaid, to the applicant and to the owners of property
abutting the boundary of the property that is the subject of the
application for an animal permit, using for this purpose the last
known name and address of such owners as shown upon the last
equalized assessment roll of Los Angeles County. Such notice shall
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 7
C20
contain the address, a general explanation of the matter to be
considered, and the time and place at which the public hearing on
the matter will be held
B Decision By Resolution The Planning Commission shall announce
Its decision by resolution (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972; amd Ord. 1 15,
1 -18 -2000)
C Decision Final Any action by the Planning Commission on such
matters shall be final and conclusive Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972, amd
2000 Code)
D Notice Of Decision Not later than fifteen (15) days following the
adoption of a resolution ordering that an appeal be granted or
denied, a copy of the resolution shall be mailed to the applicant and
to any other person requesting notice of the action (Ord 790,
7 -24 -1972)
6 2 12 GROUNDS FOR REVOCATION Any animal permit issued pursuant to
the provisions of this Chapter may be revoked by the Planning Commission In
the event the Planning Commission determines to initiate proceedings for the
revocation of any animal permit, said Commission shall adopt a resolution
declaring its intention to revoke such permit and fix a time and place for a hearing
on said resolution No such hearing shall be held unless a copy of the resolution
is ma led to the permittee not less than five (5) days prior to the hearing. At such
hearing the Planning Commission shall hear all evidence presented material to
its determination and may revoke the permit following such hearing by resolution
after it finds
A That the permit, or a prior permit of which the permit is an extension
was obtained by fraud, or
B That the permittee has violated the law in keeping such animal, or
C That the animal or animals endanger the public peace, health or
safety (Ord 790, 7 -24 -1972)
CHAPTER
DOGS
SECTION
6 3 1
Definitions
6 3 2
Licensing Requirements
6 33
License Tags
6 3 4
Receipt Blanks
6 3 5
Kennel Licenses
ORDINANCE NO _
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 8 I? U 2 1
6 3.6 Suspension Or Revocation of Dog License
637 Refusing to Show License Unlawful
6 3 8 Running At Large Prohibited
6 3 9 Dangerous Dogs, Impoundment, Hearing
6.3.10 Rabies Control
6 3 11 Dog Park Rules
6312 Interfering with Animal Control Officers Prohibited
6313 Interference with Police Dogs
6 3 1 DEFINITIONS The following words when used in this Chapter shall, for
the purposes of this Chapter, have the meanings respectively ascribed to them in
this Section
DOG Includes male and female
KENNEL A place where four (4) or more adult dogs or cats or any combination
thereof, are kept, whether by owners of the dogs and cats or by persons
providing activities and care, whether or not for compensation. An adult dog or
cat is one of either sex, altered or unaltered, that has reached the age of four (4)
months
POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG Any of the following.
A Any dog which, when unprovoked, on two (2) separate occasions
within the prior thirty six (36) month period, engages in any
behavior that requires a defensive action by any person to prevent
bodily injury when the person and the dog are off the property of
the owner or keeper of the dog
B Any dog which, when unprovoked, bites a person causing a less
severe injury than as defined in section 31604 of the State Food
and Agriculture Code
C Any dog which, when unprovoked, on two (2) separate occasions
within the prior thirty six (36) month period, has killed, seriously
bitten, inflicted injury, or otherwise caused injury attacking a
domestic animal off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog
VICIOUS DOG Any of the following
A Any dog seized under section 599aa of the Penal Code and upon
the sustaining of a conviction of the owner or keeper under
subdivision (a) of section 597 5 of the Penal Code
B Any dog which, when unprovoked, in an aggressive manner, inflicts
severe injury on or kills a human being
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 9 022
C Any dog previously determined to be and currently listed as a
potentially dangerous dog which, after its owner or keeper has
been notified of this determination, continues the behavior
described in the definition of "potentially dangerous dog" in this
Section, or is maintained in violation of section 31641, 31642, or
31643 of said State Food and Agriculture Code. 2000 Code)
6 3 2 LICENSING REQUIREMENTS
A License Required, Exceptions
1 Except as provided in this Chapter, it is unlawful for any
person to have, keep, maintain or harbor within the City any
dog without first having obtained from the City an annual
license so to do upon the payment of the fee required by
subsection B of this section
2 it shall not, however, be necessary to purchase a license or
to pay a license fee for any dog under the age of four (4)
months whether the same is male or female.
3 It is further provided, however, that the license fee shall not
apply to any dogs kept or maintained exclusively in any dog
kennel in the City (Ord 431, 1 -27 -1954)
B Annual License Fees Upon the effective date hereof, the annual
license fee for keeping and maintaining an unaltered dog in the City
is fixed at the sum of forty dollars ($40 00) per year The annual
license fee for a spayed or neutered dog shall be twenty dollars
($20 00) per year, if a certificate is presented from a licensed
veterinarian verifying that the dog has been spayed or neutered
(Ord 1091, 1 -6 -1987)
C Discount For Senior Citizens A fifty percent (50 %) discount on the
dog license fee shall be made available to any resident sixty -two
(62) years of age or older who makes application for the discount
(Ord 972, 6 -19 -1970, amd 2000 Code)
D Seeing eye or guide dogs are those dogs that have been especially
trained to lead and aid the blind or deaf Any blind or deaf person
having custody of such a dog may keep and harbor the dog within
the City by obtaining a license to keep a dog as provided herein,
and may lawfully take the dog into any food establishment within
the City There will be no fee charged for such dogs upon proof of
antirabies vaccination
E Date Payable, Proration, Penalty
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 10
G23
I Any license fee required to be paid by this Chapter shall be
payable annually in advance on March 1 of each year, and
the license shall expire at midnight on the last day of
February of the following year The full amount of the
license fee shall be payable for any license falling due during
the period from January 1 of the year to June 30 of the year
2 Fifty percent (50 %) of the amount of the license fee shall be
payable for any license falling due subsequent to September
30 of the year for the remaining fraction of the year
3 Any license fee payable under the provisions of this Chapter
remaining unpaid for a period of thirty (30) days after the
same shall become payable hereunder, shall be subject to a
penalty of fifty percent (50 %) of the fee due, which penalty
shall be collected by the license collector at the time of the
collection of the license fee, and shall be in addition to the
principal sum thereof In determining whether or not a
penalty has accrued under the provisions of this Chapter, the
License Collector may require an affidavit from any person
claiming exemption from the payment of any penalty
hereunder, which affidavit shall set forth the facts upon
which the claim for the exemption is based. (Ord. 973,
6 -19 -1979, amd 2000 Code)
F Failure To Pay License Fee Whenever any person owning,
harboring or having the care or custody of any dog fails to pay the
license fee provided and specified in this Chapter for the dog, the
poundmaster may cause the dog to be seized and kept in the public
pound for the period and in the manner and upon the terms,
conditions and requirements as specified in this Chapter. (Ord
431, 1 -27 -1954)
6 3 3 LICENSE TAGS
A Contents The City shall each year procure a sufficient number of
suitable metallic license tags to meet the requirements of this
Chapter, numbered from one upward consecutively, on which tags
shall be stamped the date of their expiration and the license
number, and shall issue the same to the poundmaster in
consecutive order as may be required, keeping an account thereof
B Duplicate The charge of one dollar ($1.00) shall be made for the
issuance of a license and metallic tag to replace a lost license or
tag
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL n
PAGE NO 11 n 2 4
C Affixing To Dog Collar. The owner or person having the care,
control or custody of any dog upon which the license fee has been
paid shall securely fasten the metallic license tag upon a suitable
collar and securely fasten the collar with the tag attached thereto
upon the dog A dog harness or other device may be substituted in
lieu of the collar, if so desired (Ord. 431, 1 -27 -1954)
6 3 4 RECEIPT BLANKS The City shall cause to be printed a sufficient number
of receipt blanks to meet the requirements of this Chapter The receipt blanks
shall provide for the description of the dog for which the license fee is paid, the
number of the metallic license tag which has been issued for the dog and also
the name and address of the owner of the dog The receipts shall also designate
the rabies vaccination date and tag number and the sex of the dog for which the
license fee has been paid (Ord 733, 1 -26 -1970)
6 3 5 KENNEL LICENSES
A License Required, Fee Any person conducting, managing or
maintaining a dog kennel as defined in Section 6.3 1 of this Chapter
shall pay to the City for the privilege of conducting or maintaining
the dog kennel a fee of twenty four dollars ($24.00) per year for the
kennel which shall entitle the kennel operator to maintain ten (10)
or fewer dogs An additional license fee of twenty -four dollars
($24 00) shall be paid for ten (10) dogs, or fraction thereof, in
excess of the first ten (10) dogs (Ord 733, 1 -26 -1970)
B Operation Permit No kennel license shall be issued unless a
written permit to have, maintain or operate the kennel is first
obtained from the City Council Before granting the permit, the City
Council shall refer the application therefor to the Planning Com-
mission, poundmaster and to the Health Officer for investigation,
report and recommendation to the City Council with reference
thereto (Ord 431, 1 -27 -1954)
C Every person owning or operating any kennel shall keep all animals
therein under proper confinement on the premises and shall not
cause, permit or allow such animals to be or to run at large
D Records required for each animal The holder of a kennel license
shall keep available for inspection, on the premises, a record that
shall show
1 The name, current address and telephone number of the owner
of each animal kept at the kennel,
2 The date such animal entered the kennel,
3 The reason for such animal being at the kennel, such as for
boarding, sale, breeding or grooming,
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 12
L�5
4 The description of the animal, including its age, breed, sex and
color,
5. That there exists a current, valid rabies certificate for every dog
over four months of age so long as such dog is kept at the kennel
6 3 6 SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF DOG LICENSE The Chief of
Police, or his or her designee, shall have, and the Chief of Police, or his or her
designee, expressly reserves the right and power, notwithstanding any other
provision, term or condition in this Chapter contained to the contrary, to suspend
and also to revoke any dog license issued under the provisions of this Chapter, if
at any time it appears to the Chief of Police, or his or her designee, or the Chief
of Police, or is or her designee, finds that any dog described or referred to in any
dog license, or for which any dog license has or may be issued under this
Chapter is vicious, dangerous or apt to bite or inure any person. (Ord 1258,
6 -19 -1996)
6 3 7 REFUSING TO SHOW LICENSE UNLAWFUL Any person upon whom
any demand is made under authority of this Title for the exhibition of any dog,
rabies vaccination certificate, or any dog license or tag, who fails or refuses to
exhibit the same if he has it in his possession, is guilty of a violation of this
section
6 3 8 RUNNING AT LARGE PROHIBITED
A No person owning or having charge, custody, possession or control
of any dog shall, and it is unlawful for any person to cause, permit
or allow the same to be, or to run at large in or upon any highway,
street, lane, alley, court or other public place, or in or upon any
private property or premises, other than those of the person owning
or having charge, custody, possession or control of the dog within
the City, unless the dog is restrained by a substantial leash not to
exceed six feet (6') in length and is in charge, custody, possession
or control of a competent person (Ord.360, 11 -8 -1949)
B This provision shall not apply to public areas of the City officially
designated as a "dog park" or to police service dogs while such
dogs are under the control of a peace officer.
6 3 9 DANGEROUS DOG, IMPOUNDMENT; HEARING:
A Filing Of Opinion, Impoundment Whenever any dog is, in the
written opinion of the poundmaster, file with the City Clerk, vicious,
dangerous, potentially dangerous or apt to bite or injure any
person, and is kept in such manner as to constitute an apparent
menace to any person, the dog may be immediately impounded by
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING SSMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 13
Oct
the poundmaster or his duly authorized agents, representatives or
assistants
B Notice Of Impoundment, Opinion, Hearing. As soon as reasonably
possible after the dog is so impounded, or a written opinion is filed
with the City Clerk, the owner of the dog, or the person harboring
the dog, or the person to whom the license for the dog was issued
or any person whose name appears therein, shall be notified, either
personally or by mail addressed to the person, at the address
shown in the license, of the fact of the impounding or of the filing of
the written opinion and that the person or any person interested
may appear at a hearing before the Chief of Police, or his or her
designee, to be specified in the notice, the notice of hearing to be
served at least forty eight (48) hours prior to the time of the hearing,
and show cause if the person can, why the dog should not be
destroyed The notification shall also contain or have attached
thereto a copy of the opinion so filed, if any
C Hearing, Decision Upon the hearing, the Chief of Police, or his or
her designee, shall hear all persons who appear and desire to be
heard, and shall thereupon decide whether the dog shall be
released, destroyed or otherwise disposed of, and the decision of
the Chief of Police, or his or her designee, after the hearing, shall
be final and conclusive (Ord 1258, 6 -19 -1996, amd 2000 Code)
D Any dog declared after a hearing to be dangerous, if not already
impounded by the department, shall be immediately surrendered to
the department A violation of the provisions of this subsection is a
misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding $500.00, or by
imprisonment in the county fail for a period not exceeding six
months, or by both such fine and imprisonment
6310 RABIES CONTROL
A Vaccination Requirements
1 Vaccination Required, Exception Every person keeping,
harboring or having a dog over the age of four (4) months in
the City shall cause the dog to be vaccinated with rabies
vaccine within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of
harboring, keeping or having the dog within the City, or from
the date the dog attains the age of four (4) months, provided,
however, that the aforesaid provision shall not apply so as to
require the vaccination of any dog which has been
vaccinated with a chick embryo vaccine by a person licensed
by the State or of any other state or nation to practice
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 14
027
veterinary medicine where the vaccination has been
completed within the period of time prescribed in this
Section If chick embryo vaccine was used in the
vaccination, it must have been completed within two (2)
years prior to the date the dog was kept, harbored or brought
Into the City If tissue phenolized vaccine was used, the
vaccination must have been completed within one year prior
to the date the dog was kept, harbored or brought Into the
City (Ord 526, 5 -12- 19513)
2 Revaccination
a Every person keeping, harboring or having a dog in
the City that has been vaccinated with chick embryo
vaccine shall cause the dog to be revaccinated within
a period of not more than two (2) years after the prior
vaccination
b Every person keeping, harboring or having a dog in
the City which has been vaccinated with tissue
phenolized vaccine shall cause the dog to be
revaccinated with rabies vaccine within a period of not
more than one year after the prior vaccination
3 Vaccination Certificate Issuance. Every person practicing
veterinary medicine in the City who vaccinates a dog with
rabies vaccine shall issue to the person keeping, harboring
or having the dog a certificate, which is signed by the
veterinarian and which states thereon the name and
description of the dog, the date of the vaccination and the
type of vaccine used (Ord. 510, 9 -30 -1957)
4 Certificate And Tag, Exhibition
a Every person applying for a dog license, whether to
the poundmaster under contract to the City, or to the
City, shall exhibit a certificate and rabies vaccination
tag issued by a person licensed by the State or any
other state or nation to practice veterinary medicine,
which certificate shall show that the dog for which the
license shall be issued either-
(1) Has been vaccinated in accordance with the
provisions of subsections All and A2 of this
Section, or
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE b
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 15
028
(2) Should not be vaccinated with rabies vaccine
by reason of age, infirmity or other disability,
which disability is shown on the face of the
certificate and to the satisfaction of the person
Issuing the license to be in effect at the time
B Impoundment Of Dog Without Tag.
1 The poundmaster, under contract to the City, shall capture
and impound any dog found within the City limits which is not
wearing a valid license tag and rabies tag conforming to the
provisions of this Chapter
2 Any officer or employee of the poundmaster, any police
officer of the City or of any City In Los Angeles County who
is in pursuit of a dog shall have the right to enter upon any
private or public property in the City in order to examine or
capture any dog thereon or therein which is suspected of
being in violation of the provisions of subsection A4 of this
Section or Is suspected of being rabid or infected with rabies;
provided, however, that no such officer or employee shall
have the right to enter a house which is in use as a
residence without first having secured a search warrant
therefor (Ord 526, 5 -12 -1958)
C Release From Impoundment
1 No dog impounded as provided in subsection B of this
Section shall be released to any person except where there
has been a performance of the following conditions (Ord
510, 9 -30 -1957)
a There has been presented to the poundmaster a
current license and rabies tag conforming to this
Chapter for the dog (Ord 512, 11 -12 -1957)
b Where the person keeping, harboring or having the
dog is a resident of the City, there has been paid to
the poundmaster the license fee for a City dog license
as provided by law.
c There has been paid to the poundmaster the
impounding, collection and other fees as provided by
law
d There has been paid to the poundmaster a
reasonable fee as determined by the poundmaster for
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING SSMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 16
0 2 �
the vaccination of the dog; provided, however, that
the fee shall not exceed five dollars ($5.00), or, there
has been shown to the satisfaction of the
poundmaster that the dog has been vaccinated with
rabies vaccine within the time penods and according
to the other requirements as prescribed in
subsections At and A2 of this Section, or, that a
certificate of disability has been issued for such dog
as provided in subsection A4 of this Section
e The poundmaster has determined that the dog does
not have and Is not reasonably suspected of having
rabies (Ord 510, 9 -30 -1957)
D Rabies Suspect, Impoundment Procedure If the poundmaster
suspects that any dog so Impounded has rabies, he shall hold the
dog for inspection by a health officer of the County In the event
that the health officer determines that the dog is afflicted with
rabies, it shall be disposed of or confined for such time as the
health officer directs In the event that the health officer suspects
that the dog may develop rabies, it shall be confined for such time
as the health officer directs Whenever the health officer
determines that the dog does not have rabies, it shall be released
In accordance with the provision of subsection C of this Section
Ord 510, 9 -30 -1957)
6 3 11 DOG PARK RULES
A Hours, Rules Owner's and /or handlers shall be in attendance with
dogs during the use of the dog park The dog park shall be open
from dawn to dusk, seven (7) days a week. The following rules
shall be in force
1 Aggressive dogs are not allowed In the park,
2 No food in the park/don't feed dogs in the park,
3 Owners must supervise and clean up after dogs,
4 Children under twelve (12) years of age must be supervised
by an adult,
5 Dogs must be at least four (4) months old and vaccinated,
6 Dogs in heat are not permitted,
7 No spiked collars,
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 17
030
8 No bikes, roller blades, roller skates, strollers or similar items
allowed in the park,
9 Owners must have a leash available at all times,
10 Parking regulations must be obeyed,
11 Dog owners are liable for any injuries or damage caused by
their dog(s),
12 All dogs must be currently licensed,
13 Professional dog trainers are not allowed to conduct training
on site,
14 No person may bring more than three (3) dogs to the park at
one time
B Prohibited Behavior The following behaviors must be stopped
Immediately
Prolonged growling,
2 Mounting or pinning of other dogs
C Emergency In case of an emergency 911 shall be called (Ord
1 318, 6 -20 -2000)
63 12 INTERFERING WITH ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICERS
PROHIBITED
A person shall not Interfere with, oppose or resist the poundmaster or any
employee of the City, while such person is engaged in the performance of
any act authorized by this Title
63 13 INTERFERENCE WITH POLICE DOGS
It is unlawful for any person to willfully tease, torment, agitate, provoke,
beat, kick, strike, inure, maim, disable, kill, or in any way interfere with any
dog being used in a police function by law enforcement officers
CHAPTER 4
IMPOUNDMENT OF ANIMALS
SECTION
6 4 1 Poundmaster, Duties, Impoundment Fees
6 4 2 Public Pound Created, Expenses
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO IS
C31
6 4 3 Animal Impoundment
6 4 4 Reclamation Of Impounded Animals
6 4 5 Impoundment Sale Proceeds
6 4 6 Trespassing Animal Or Fowl
6 4 1 POUNDMASTER, DUTIES, IMPOUNDMENT FEES.
A City Contract The City Council may at its discretion at any time
hereafter, and from time to time hereafter, and for such period as to
the City Council may seem proper, contract with any qualified and
responsible person for the furnishing to the City of the public pound
referred to in this Chapter and for the performance of all of the
duties of poundmaster in connection therewith, as contemplated in
this Chapter, including, if the City Council shall so contract, the
collection and issuance by the poundmaster of any license under
this Chapter In the event the City Council does so contract, then
and in that event the contract shall designate the person to act as
the poundmaster under this Chapter and also provide for the
appointment of his deputies, assistants and successors, if any In
the event of the making of the contract, the person so designated or
selected, as contemplated in the contract, shall be the poundmaster
and the public pound of the City shall in this case be maintained at
the place or places indicated in the contract.
B Office Created The office of poundmaster of the City is created.
The Chief of Police or his or her designee shall serve as
poundmaster
C Collected Fund Disposition All monies received by the
poundmaster as fees and charges of every kind in connection with
the licensing, impounding, sale or keeping of any animal or fowl,
unless otherwise provided in the contract provided for in this
Chapter, shall be paid by him into the City Treasury before twelve
o'clock (12 00) noon on the Saturday next succeeding the collection
thereof
D Entry On Private Premises The poundmaster is authorized to
enter upon private premises at any and all reasonable times while
engaged in the discharge of his duties under this Chapter for the
purposes of enforcing the provisions of this Chapter.
E Duties
1 Generally It shall be the duty of the poundmaster to make
investigations concerning, to take up, receive into the pound,
maintain therein an to release, discharge or dispose of
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 19
032
therefrom, all animals and fowl found running at large upon
any public highway, street, avenue, way, lane, alley, park,
square, sidewalk or any other public place within the City, or
which shall be staked out or fastened in such a manner that
they can go or enter into or upon any such public highway,
street, avenue, way, lane, alley, park, square, sidewalk or
other public place within the City, or which may be delivered
to such poundmaster by any person under the provisions of
this Chapter, or which may be on private premises within the
City, but which are nevertheless subject to impoundment or
disposal under the provisions of this Chapter (Ord 431,
1 -27 -1 54)
2 City Dog License Collector The poundmaster is declared
the City dog license collector and the poundmaster shall,
upon the payment of the license fee as contemplated in
Chapter 3 of this Title by any owner or person having control
or charge of any dog within the City, deliver to the person an
appropriate tag for which the license fee has been paid and
shall also deliver to the person a receipt for a sum of money
as has been paid as the license fee. (Ord. 982, 12 -18 -1979)
3 Records And Notices The poundmaster shall keep a full,
true and correct record of all animals and fowl taken,
received and impounded, the date of the impounding and the
date and manner of their release, discharge or disposal and
except as hereinafter provided shall keep conspicuously
posted, at the entrance to the pound, a list of all animals and
fowl therein contained, together with a brief description of
each of the animals and fowl at all times during which
animals and fowl remain in the pound; provided, however,
that the notice need not be posted if all animals and fowl
within the pound are open to viewing by the public between
the hours of ten thirty o'clock (10 30) A M and five o'clock
(5 00) P M each day, except Sundays and holidays
4 Care Of Animals And Fowl. The poundmaster shall provide
the necessary subsistence and shall properly care for all
animals and fowl while in his custody
5 Animal Or Fowl Disposal In addition to any other duties
imposed upon the poundmaster by this Chapter, unless
otherwise provided in any contract executed under this
Chapter, it shall be the duty of the poundmaster to remove
and dispose of any and all dead animals or fowl found in or
upon any of the public highways, streets, avenues, ways,
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 20 033
lanes, alleys, parks, squares, sidewalks or other public
places within the City. The poundmaster shall also have the
right to remove and dispose of any abandoned dead animal
or fowl found or being upon any private premises, and, also
to remove and humanely dispose of any live animal or fowl
which, either by reason of age or Infirmity or request of the
owner or person having the care, custody or control thereof,
is to be destroyed and disposed of within the City, provided,
however, that in case of large animals weighing two hundred
(200) pounds or more each, and whether live or dead, the
poundmaster shall have a claim against the owner of the
animal for the actual cost of removal and disposition of the
animal and the owner shall be liable to the poundmaster for
the amount of the claim (Ord 431, 1 -27 -1954)
F Fees For Impounding And Keeping Animals. The poundmaster
shall collect from the owner or owners of all animals and fowl
impounded, except dogs, the following fees for impounding and
keeping the same
1 For every horse, mare, colt, goat, sheep, cow, mule, jack,
fenny, ass, bull, ox, steer or calf Impounded by him, the sum
of ten dollars ($10 00) as an impounding fee and the further
sum of two dollars ($2 00) per day for each day the animal is
necessarily held in such pound
2 For all other animals except dogs, not hereinabove
specifically mentioned and all fowl impounded in the public
pound, the poundmaster shall collect the sum of five dollars
($5 00) as an impounding fee and In addition thereto the
sum of one dollar ($1.00) per day for each day the animal or
fowl Is necessarily held In the pound (Ord. 938, 6 -21 -1977)
G Vaccination Fee, Redemption Of Stray Dogs And Cats. The
poundmaster shall collect a three dollar ($3.00) fee from persons
redeeming impounded dogs and cats for administering distemper
vaccinations to stray dogs and for vaccinating stray cats for feline
diseases
H Fees And Procedures For Impounding And Keeping Dogs: Upon
impounding any dog found running at large, the poundmaster shall
immediately prepare a notice containing a brief description of the
dog and within twenty four (24) hours thereafter shall deliver to the
Chief of Police a copy of such notice
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 21 C 3
1 At any time within five (5) days from the date of the first
posting of the notice, the owner or persons entitled to the
possession of the dog may reclaim the dog upon payment to
the poundmaster of an Impounding fee of seven dollars fifty
cents ($7 50),
2 For the second Impoundment of a dog, owned by the same
person, the pound fee shall be fifteen dollars ($15 00),
3 For the third impoundment of a dog, owned by the same
person, the pound fee shall be twenty five dollars ($25.00),
4 In addition to the foregoing Impounding fee, the sum of two
dollars ($2 00) per day for each day or portion thereof for
which the dog has been impounded (Ord 71, 6 -19 -1979)
6 4 2 PUBLIC POUND CREATED, EXPENSES
A Created, Location A public pound for the City for the Impounding
of animals and fowl is authorized and the public pound Is created
and established The public pound shall be maintained at such
place or places as the City Council may from time to time hereafter
by resolution of the City Council determine or as may be
designated in any contract for the performance of pound services
approved and authorized by the City Council (Ord. 431,
1 -27 -1954)
B Expense Of Establishing And Maintaining- All expenses of
keeping, maintaining and establishing the public pound, unless
otherwise provided for in the contract referred to in subsection
6 4 1A of this Chapter shall be paid by the City All claims therefor,
unless provided otherwise in such contract, shall be presented,
allowed and paid as other claims against the City are presented,
allowed and paid (Ord 733, 1 -26 -1970)
6 4 3 ANIMAL IMPOUNDMENT
A Costs Of Subsistence And Care The costs of subsistence or care
for impounded animals and fowl shall be a charge against and paid
by the City, unless otherwise specified in any contract which may
be awarded for the pound service as contemplated in subsection
6 4 1A of this Chapter, in which case the costs thereof shall be paid
and discharged as contemplated in the contract
B Minimum Period Of Impoundment Every animal and fowl
impounded in the public pound shall be kept therein for a full penod
of at least five (5) days, exclusive of the day of Impoundment,
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 22
035
unless sooner redeemed by the lawful owner thereof or unless in
the opinion of the poundmaster the physical condition of the animal
or fowl is such as to justify prior disposition in order to serve
humane considerations (Ord. 431, 1 -27 -1954)
6 4 4 RECLAMATION OF IMPOUNDED ANIMALS.
A Right To Reclaim Upon Payment Of Charges- The owner or any
person entitled to the control of any animal or fowl impounded in
the public pound has the right to reclaim the same at any time prior
to the sale or other actual disposal thereof, upon payment to the
poundmaster of the costs and charges provided for in this Chapter
B Payment Of Fees When any redemption is made under this
Chapter, in addition to paying any impounding fee or costs incurred
by reason of impounding any animal impounded under this
Chapter, there shall also be paid the amount of any license fee
which may then be due or payable on such animal under this Title
or any other section of this Code or ordinance of the City, in case a
current license for the animal is not in existence at the time
C Damage Payment When any redemption is made under this
Chapter, in addition to paying any impounding fee or costs incurred
by reason of impounding any animal or fowl, there shall also be
paid reasonable demands for actual damage done by any animal or
fowl running at large The damages required to be paid by this
subsection shall be paid to the person whose property was
damaged Ord 431, 1 -27 -1954)
6 4 5 IMPOUNDMENT SALE PROCEEDS Whenever any animal or fowl is
sold as provided in and under the provision of this Chapter, the proceeds of the
sale shall, unless otherwise provided in any contract made as provided in
subsection 6 4.1A of this Chapter, be paid into the City Treasury. (Ord. 431,
1 -27 -1954, amd 2000 Code)
6 4 6 TRESPASSING ANIMAL OR FOWL Any animal or fowl found
trespassing upon any private ground or premises within the City may be taken up
by the party owning, controlling or having possession of the ground or premises,
or by the agent or representative of the person, and committed to the
poundmaster to be dealt with as provided in this Chapter. Any person taking up
the stray animal or fowl found running at large or trespassing upon any property,
ground or premises owned, controlled or in possession of the person shall
promptly notify the poundmaster of such taking up and it is unlawful for any such
person to fail or refuse to surrender the animal to the poundmaster or his duly
authorized representative upon demand (Ord 431, 1 -27 -1954)
ORDINANCE NO _
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 23 V 3 6
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall become effective at midnight on the
thirtieth (30) day from and after the final passage and adoption hereof.
SECTION 3 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of
this ordinance; shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original
ordinances of said City, shall make a not of the passage and adoption thereof in
the records of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted, and shall
within 15 days after the passage or adoption thereof cause the same top be
published or posted in accordance with the law
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
Mike Gordon, Mayor
ATTEST
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby
certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five,
that the foregoing Ordinance No was duly introduced by said City
Council at a regular meeting held on the day of , and duly
passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor,
and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on
the 20TH day of JUNE, 2000, and the same was so passed and adopted by the
following vote
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
ABSTAIN
NOT PARTICIPATING
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
APPR VED AS TO FORM -
Mark D ensley, City Attorney
ORDINANCE NO
AMENDING ESMC TITLE 6
ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGE NO 24
,137
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
MEETING DATE- January 16, 2001
AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business
Water Well Project Report presentation by RBF
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
Discussion andfor possible direction of staff
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
In order to inform the community on the Water Well Project, it was decided that a
presentation on the progress of the project be made by RBF, the consultants who are
providing technical assistance on this project
This presentation, among other facts, will report on the activities completed and on the
upcoming activities
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
FISCAL IMPACT None
Operating Budget*
Amount Requested,
Account Number,
Project Phase.
Appropriation Required, No
ORIGINATED BY a/ Date:
Andres Santamana Director of Public Works JAN 1�
REVIEWED BY I-X7 ,L Date:
N \COUNCIL 01UANUARY16 08 Mednesday 1 /10101 8 00 A M)
038
3
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE' January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING. COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS & BOARDS
AGENDA DESCRIPTION Announce appointments to the Camp Eucalyptus Task Force and set
first meeting thereof
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
(1) Announce appointments,
(2) Set first meeting of Camp Eucalyptus Task Force
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION. Council authorized the formation of this Task Force on
December 5, 2000 for the purpose of making recommendations to the Recreation & Parks
Commission regarding the disposition of the Angeles Girl Scout Camp Eucalyptus at 645
California Street
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS N/A
FISCAL IMPACT N/A
ORIGINATED Julia Abreu- Mason, Executive Assistant Date January 05, 2001
REVIEWED BY Mary Strenn, City Manager Date: January 10, 2001
w I cce_.oi i m o, f aowmma, to C� Eoowvp ss rut Porcr 0 3 J
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Committees, Boards,
and Commissions
AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Review Recreation and Parks Commission
recommendation on proposed Skate Park location
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION. Approve proposed skate park location
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: The Recreation and Parks Commission recently
revisited options for a skate park location in El Segundo The Commission
consensus was that a park in the vicinity of the Scout House on Grand near
Eucalyptus was desirable Staff was directed to meet with representatives of the
Scout House Association to discuss a skate park in proximity to their facility
Possible locations on the east and west sides of the Scout House were
discussed Staff had considered incorporating the existing Teen Center game
court and parking area into the Scout House yard to increase available square
footage and keep the park in close proximity to the Teen Center During
discussions with Scout House representatives, this location received favorable
feedback (Continued on reverse side)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Site Plan and Draft Skate Park Proposal
FISCAL IMPACT Approximately $150,000 appropriation will be required
at a later date
Operating Budget
Amount Requested
Account Number*
Project Phase
Appropriation Required,
9RIG�NINTEY-.� DATE: January 4, 2001
�J
Greg son, Recreation and Parks Director
REVIEWED PY DATE January 4
Mary enn, City Manager Yo/
14 5
Consequently, a meeting was set to discuss the site with representatives of the
City Council, Recreation and Parks Commission, Scout House Association,
Skate Park Task Force, City Manager, and Recreation and Parks staff The
result of this meeting was a decision to recommend this site to the Recreation
and Parks Commission and the Scout House Association Board for
consideration Both organizations have agreed in concept to recommend this
site to the City Council for approval The Scout House Association has
requested the use of some open space area west of the Scout House for scout
activities previously conducted in the yard on the east side of their building
There would need to be some modifications to the terrain in this area to
accommodate their needs, and the area would need to be fenced Other issues
for consideration include additional enclosed space for meetings and an area for
vehicle storage
The process needed to proceed with the park development includes
• Approval of proposed skate park location,
• Consideration of deal points to be presented by Scout House Association
sub - committee,
• Development and sign -off of Memorandum of Understanding between City
Council and Scout House association,
• Restructuring of the lease between the two parties,
• Staff development and distribution of an RFP for skate park design
services,
• Hire architect to conducts visioning workshops with local skaters and
determine the park design features,
• Renderings presented to Recreation and Parks Commission for input and
recommendation to City Council,
• Design presented to City Council for approval and Council authorizes
development of plans and specifications for the skate park,
• Council authorizes staff to go out to bid for construction of the park,
• Council approves Construction bid,
• Groundbreaking ceremony,
• Park construction begins,
�4i
CT?
G_
d
W
c
C
O
cU
f"
f
f
�a
a
Q�
o �
'd
N
C3
L
042
Ow,
0)
L)
Q
. n
--I'
f"
f
f
�a
a
Q�
o �
'd
N
C3
L
042
Skate Park Proposal
The City wishes to develop a skate park for local citizens on city -owned property
between the Teen Center building and the Scout House on Grand Ave south of
Recreation Park The Scout House is located on city -owned property, and a
portion of the leased property east of the house is being considered for skate
park development
The Scout House Association has indicated their willingness to relinquish use of
this yard area for the purposes of developing a skate park for the community
They have requested that the City consider allowing them to level and fence a
section of the turf area generally located west of the Scout House between
Grand Ave , Eucalyptus Ave and the southern parking lot of Recreation Park
The Scout House Association is also considering additional meeting space on
the north side of the building This could be accomplished by enclosing the
existing loading dock The board is also interested in exploring parking /storage
options on the northwest side of the existing building, The Scout House
structure is owned by the Scout House Association, and any improvements to the
Scout House would be financed by the Association
The Scout House Association has appointed a sub - committee to look at potential
improvements in order to enhance their participant's experience, and increase
security and safety at the Scout House They have indicated a willingness to
solicit the services of a professional architect to assist with the layout and design
of the improvements they are proposing
If the City Council approves the proposed location for the skate park, and agrees
in theory the improvements outlined in this report, the Scout House Association
will proceed with renderings of the proposed improvements for review by City
Staff and the Council After normal reviews have been conducted by the Building
and Safety Division of the Community, Economic, and Development Services
Department, and upon approval of a final proposal, the Scout House Association
will be able to proceed with the agreed upon improvements in and around the
existing Scout House
Any physical improvements to the Scout House or the adjacent property will
require an amendment to the existing lease, which is currently in effect through
January, 2010
043
644
/,
/�
z
§
;`
§
\
�
\
�
/
`
Z
`
°
\
-�� |!)
!\ .
�
E!§(
t
>z
!§t
{
= -\
,!l�
1§
! -}4I44
!
(` :;
( ;§ |
\)<:, \!\! )\«|,
r
E
;
! ! = §
§\
.!2!
, i ;
(0E0
;
- �
:!
\
\\
644
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER
12/09/2000 THROUGH 12/22/2000
Date
12/11100
12/13/00
12/13/00
12/14/00
12/15/00
12/21100
12/21/00
12/21/00
12/21 /00
12/21/00
12/21/00
12/08- 12/22/00
Payee Amount
West Basin
IRS
Employment Development
Health Comp
Pitney Bowes
Wells Fargo Bank
Federal Reserve Bank
Federal Reserve Bank
Health Comp
IRS
Employment Development
Workers Comp Activity
DATE OF RATIFICATION: 01102101
TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE:
Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by
828,899 12
17,703 77
3,63436
1,72692
10,000 00
30,000 00
15000
30000
1,22751
187,459 05
38,125 64
23,193 57
1,142,419 94
Deputy Treasurer
Ll
Date
Finance Director , /yl /� ) h-� X60 I
Date
City Manager e
Dates
Description
H2O Pmt
Special Management Pay
Special Management Pay
Weekly claims 12/8
Postage Machine
TPT Golf Course Payroll
Emp Savings Bonds Series I
Emp Savings Bonds Series EE
Weekly claims 12/8
Federal Taxes PR 13
State Taxes PR 13
SCRMA checks issued
1,142,419.94
Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurers Office of the City of El Segundo
045
\;g ,; { )I
§!!- - E� § ;§z
/ \)) §\ )z \,,))E!(([
»^ °ilfE§l,,z�;
>i /§!! ;! -�: z -�
§;( \(|§§ § | | |4 /E /] § §�)
;;!ulB!# ;);
,! = §E!! ,!§ ; ;,> | \B!■ ;§§>
\ - „ - - - - - - - - - -- -
!
\
\\ /\
§
�
\§
/
!
/
\/
)k
/{
! �k
{�k$
!!'!
|� |�|
$!� |�
§ { § |ƒ
!!!!k
� ;!!!
�
\
§
(|
\
\/\
046
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER
12/23/2000 THROUGH 1/512001
Date
Payee
Amount
Description
12/27/00
Wells Fargo Bank
30,000 00
TPT Golf Course Payroll
12127/00
Health Comp
1,70245
Weekly claims 12/22
1/3/01
Health Comp
1,04511
Weekly claims 12129
1/3/01
IRS
186,973 43
Federal Taxes PR 14
1/3/01
Employment Development
34,251 21
State Taxes PR 14
12/23- 1/5/01
Workers Comp Activity
30,873 80
SCRMA checks issued
284,846 00
DATE OF RATIFICATION: 01117/01
TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE
Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by
1
Deputy Treasurer /'ti l , //,/a/
�1 Date
Finance Director //% � j A/� 00 /
Date
City Manager
Dat6
284,846.00
Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of EI Segundo
u4 i
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2000 - 5:00 P.M.
5:00 PM Session
CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Gordon at 5 00 P.M
ROLL CALL
Mayor Gordon -
Present
Mayor ProTem Jacobs -
Present
Council Member Gaines -
Present
Council Member McDowell -
Present
Council Member Wernick -
Present
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Gaines to discuss an
item that arose after the posting of the Agenda, concerning a California Space Technology
Alliance, California Space Infrastructure Program Grant Application, with a deadline of December
21, 2000, for a request for federal funds for help in building a parking structure on the Air Force
site MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
MOVED by Council Member Gaines, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to approve of
completing the grant application for Federal Funds, to be applied to building a parking structure on
the Air Force site This approval does not commit the Council to accepting the funds after
approval MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510
CLOSED SESSION- Council moved into closed session at 5 10 P M
The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act
(Government Code §54950, et seq ) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property
Negotiator, and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or
discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel), and /or conferring with the
City's Labor Negotiators as follows-
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a))
1 City of El Segundo v Bd of Airport Commissioners, et al., LASC Case No BC 220609
2 Hill v El Segundo, USDC No CV 98- 1463- LGB(SHX)
3 Venegas v El Segundo, LASC Case No BC207136
4 Phillips Petroleum, at al v County of Los Angeles, et al , USDC No. 1938 -MRP (MANx).
5 Shell Chemical Company, et al v County of Los Angeles, et al., USDC No. 1917 -GHK
(RCx)
6 Jeffrey Capistran v El Segundo, LASC Case No YC 038535
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 19, 2000
PAGE NO 1
1 048
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(b): -1- potential case (no further
public statement is required at this time), Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c)
-2- matters.
DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) — None
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957 6) — None.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956 8) — None
Council reconvened in Open Session
CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Gordon at 7 00 P M
INVOCATION - Rev Julie Elkins, The United Methodist Church of El Segundo
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Pro Tern Sandra Jacobs
PRESENTATIONS
(a) Richmond Street School Choir
(b) Sister City Fire Officials accepted surplus Fire Engine 35 on behalf of the Guaymas
Fire Department
ROLL CALL
Mayor Gordon
- Present
Mayor ProTem Jacobs
- Present
Council Member Gaines
- Present
Council Member McDowell
- Present
Council Member Wernick
- Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of
another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council
Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250 While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does
not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda The Council will respond to comments after Public
Communications is closed
Sandra Mason, resident, requested clarification on Consent Items 11 and 21.
Phil Allen, resident, spoke regarding a traffic safety problem at Main Street and Maple Avenue.
Mrs Allen, resident, spoke regarding a traffic safety problem at Main Street and Maple Avenue.
Liz Garnholz, resident, spoke on the downtown specific plan update
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 19. 2000
PAGE NO 2
049
Sandra Mason, resident, spoke regarding traffic problems on Holly Avenue
Frank Wong, resident, spoke regarding General Fund expenditures and traffic problems
Mayor Gordon stated that at the February 6, 2001 Council meeting there would be an LAX Master
Plan update
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title
only
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Wernick to read
all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS -
Notice of Cancellation of previously noticed public hearing on the update to the
Circulation Element of the General Plan (Environmental Assessment No 454) No
public testimony will be taken
Mayor Gordon announced the cancellation of the public hearing regarding the update to the
Circulation Element of the General Plan A re- notice of the Hearing will be determined at a
later date
2 Resolution reciting the fact of the Special Municipal Election consolidated with the
National Presidential Election held November 7, 2000
City Manager Mary Strenn gave a report
City Attorney Mark Hensley read the following
RESOLUTION NO. 4201
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIOL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFONRIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
HELD ON NOVEMBER 7, 2000, DECLARING THE RUSULT AND SUCH OTHER
MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW.
MOVED by Council Member Wernick, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to adopt
Resolution No 4201, reciting the fact of the Special Municipal Election held on November 7,
2000, declaring the results MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 19, 2000
PAGE NO 3
050
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS —
3 Update on the Implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan.
Jim Hansen, Director of Community, Economic and Development Services, gave a report
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS -
4 Positions on Committees, Commissions and Boards (GCBs) that will expire in the
year 2001.
Council directed Staff to open the recruitment process for the positions on the CCBs, as
listed, begmnrng January 2001
5 Senior Housing Board's report on Park Vista's 2001 Budget
Mr Peter Freeman gave a presentation
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Wemick to approve the Park Vista
2001 budget MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510
6 Review development plans for Washington Park Extension
Greg Johnson, Director of Recreation and Parks gave a report Bob Takata, Takata
Associates, made a presentation
Consensus of Council to have Traffic Committee look at the increased foot traffic on
Mariposa Avenue as a result of the Park extension
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Wernick to
approve the design plan and authorize architect to commence with plans and specifications
and return to Council with a plan for a phased project in April 2001. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously If a
call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next
heading of business
7 Warrant Numbers 2514361 - 2514651 on Register No. 5 in total amount of
$966,560 34, and Wire Transfers in the amount of $382,678 27 Approve Warrant
Demand Register and Authorize staff to release Ratify Payroll and Employee
Benefit checks, checks released early due to contracts or agreements, emergency
disbursements and /or adjustments, and wire transfers from 11/23/00 to 12/08/00
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 19, 2000
PAGE NO 4
(t51
8 Approved City Council meeting minutes of December 5, 2000.
9 Received and filed the Status Report on the recent organizational audit of the
Department of Public Works
10 Authorized staff to solicit request for proposals from landscape /park development
design specialists to provide plans and specifications for the Sycamore Park
Irrigation System Replacement Project. (No fiscal Impact as this time).
11 ITEM PULLED BY MAYOR GORDON AT THE REQUEST OF RESIDENT
12 ITEM PULLED - POTENTIAL CONFLICT BY MAYOR PRO TEM JACOBS
13 ITEM HELD OVER TO JANUARY 16TH, 2001 MEETING
14 ITEM PULLED - POTENTIAL CONFLICT BY COUNCIL MEMBER MCDOWELL
15 Adopted the plans and specifications for the Installation of two banner poles on
Sepulveda Boulevard approximately 150 feet north of Holly Avenue (estimated cost
$50,000), and authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids
16 Approved Amendment No 1 to Employment Agreement between the City of El
Segundo and Mary Strenn (Contract No. 2630), and authorize the Mayor to execute
the Amendment on behalf of the City
17 PULLED BY COUNCIL MEMBER GAINES
18 Authorized staff to purchase two pick -up trucks as replacements for two sedans (unit
#3306 and 3307) Fiscal Impact $49,000
19 Approved Agreement No 2849 between Team One Advertising Agency and the City
of El Segundo for services related to the planning, execution and placement of
advertising for the City's overall economic development effort and for targeted
businesses
20 Approved the retirement of police service dog Dako and authorize sale of Dako to his
K -9 handler, Officer Garcia, for the nominal fee of one dollar ($1.00)
21 ITEM PULLED BY MAYOR GORDON AT THE REQUEST OF RESIDENT
MOVED by Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to approve
Consent Agenda Items 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 18, 19, and 20 MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 19, 2000
PAGE NO 5
C52
CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA
11 Adopt the program, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program for Federal fiscal
year 2000 -2001 projects utilizing Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funds.
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Gaines to adopt the
program, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program for Federal fiscal year 2000 -2001
protects utilizing Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funds. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
12 Approve Contract Amendment No 1 to the City- Pavement Coatings Company Contract No
2818 for slurry sealing and temporary re- striping of Main Street in con /unction with the
Downtown Specific Plan Improvements (estimated amount = $56,746.92).
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Gaines to approve
Contract Amendment No 1 to the City- Pavement Coatings Company Contract No. 2818 for slurry
sealing and temporary re- striping of Main Street in con /unction with the Downtown Specific Plan
Improvements MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0 MAYOR PRO TEM
JACOBS NOT PARTICIPATING DUE TO A POSSIBLE CONFLICT.
14 Adopt plans and specifications for the installation of sidewalks on the north side of Holly
Avenue between Maryland Street and Bungalow Drive — Specifications No PW 00 -16
(estimated cost = $20,000), and authorize staff to advertise the protect for receipt of
construction bids
MOVED by Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs, SECONDED by Council Member Wemick to approve Contract
Amendment No 1 to the City- Pavement Coatings Company Contract No. 2818 for slurry sealing
and temporary re- striping of Main Street in conjunction with the Downtown Specific Plan
Improvements MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 410 COUNCIL MEMBER
MCDOWELL NOT PARTICIPATING DUE TO A POSSIBLE CONFLICT.
17 Approve the Request for Proposals from Document Imaging and Records Management
Vendors for a four -phase project, and Authorize staff to solicit proposals from qualified
vendors
MOVED by Council Member Gaines, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to approve the
Request for Proposals from Document Imaging and Records Management Vendors for a four -
phase project, and Authorize staff to solicit proposals from qualified vendors. MOTION PASSED
BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510
21 Letter to Los Angeles Air Force Base
MOVED by Council Member Gaines, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to approve for
submittal the letter to Los Angeles Air Force Base MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE
VOTE. 5/0
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 19, 2000
PAGE NO 6
53
F. NEW BUSINESS —
22 Ordinance No. 1320, which established storm water and urban runoff pollution prevention
controls, requires modification to meet the recently approved Standard Urban Storm Water
Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements (No fiscal Impact)
City Attorney Mark Hensley read the following
ORDINANCE NO. 1329
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDOM
CALIFORNIA, IMPLEMENTING THE STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER
MITIGATION PLAN OF THE CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
CONTROL BOARD FOR THE LOS ANGELES REGION BY AMENDING
THE EL SEGUNO MUNICIPAL CODE TO REPEAL CHAPTER 6.28 AND
ENACT A NEW CHAPTER 6128, "STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER
MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION'.
Mayor Pro Tem Jacobs introduced the Ordinance
G. REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - NONE
H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY - NONE
I. REPORTS - CITY CLERK - NONE
J REPORTS - CITY TREASURER - NONE
K. REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
- Council Member McDowell - Wished everyone a happy holiday
- Council Member Gaines - Reported on electrical power situation
- Council Member Wernick - Reported on LAX Advisory Committee meeting.
- Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs - Wished everyone in the community a very happy holiday
season
Mayor Gordon -
23 Request for variances from the Municipal Code
a) Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and waiver of regulations In ESMC
Section 20 74 040,
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 19, 2000
PAGE NO 7
C 5 4
b) The use of air rights and waiver of the Santa Monica Radial 160 R procedure
(FAA should be contacted);
c) Waiver of the ordinance on Animal Regulations (ESMC 8.02.010);
d) Waiver of the Trespass Ordinance (ESMC 9.28.010) including 8.04 110
dealing with trespassing animals,
e) Grant a free business license for a non - profit organization (ESMC 5.04.050),
f) Waiver of the Pooper - Scooper regulations (ESMC 9.04.040),
g) Waiver of the Noise Ordinance to permit the sound of bells (ESC 9.06 0110);
and
h) Waiver of ESMC 16 04 060 (Driveway Permits Required) and 10.28 110
(Parking on Grades)
MOVED by Council Member Wernick, SECONDED by Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs to approve
the request by Mr S Clause for December 24 -25, 2000 MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
Mayor Gordon also thanked the community and his family for their continued support
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals,
who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on
behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor
and punishable by a fine of $250 While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any
item not on the agenda The Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed
Liz Garnholz, resident, spoke on the downtown revitalization plan and the briefing on LAX
expansion
Sandra Mason, resident, spoke regarding Washington Street Park and Consent Agenda Item 11
Frank Wong, resident, spoke regarding the upcoming briefing on LAX expansion
Mary Strenn, City Manager, and Jim Hansen, Director Community, Economic and Development
Services, responded to questions on the downtown revitalization plan.
Mayor Gordon noted that the meeting of January 2, 2001 was cancelled
MEMORIALS - Adjournment in memory of Jim Watson.
ADJOURNMENT - at 8 35 p m
Cathy Domann, Deputy City Clerk
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 19, 2000
PAGE NO 8
55
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING Consent
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Request by Andrea Dahm, on behalf of El Segundo Little League, for City approval to close
certain City streets for its annual opening day parade from 9 00 a m to 11.00 a.m on
Saturday, March 3, 2001 (Fiscal impact $460)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
Approve request, provided the event meets all applicable City requirements
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION*
For several years, the El Segundo Little League has held an Opening Day Parade The route
chosen includes the streets from Eucalyptus and Grand west to Main Street, north on Main
to Pine, and then east to Sheldon City support will include three motor officers, compensated
at time and one -half overtime rate, and two cadets, compensated at straight time, from the
Police Department Sign posting and traffic delineator delivery will occur during the workweek
by the Street Department and no crew will be required the day of the event The Little League
will distribute and collect the delineators the day of the event under Police Department
supervision As in the past, the FY 2000 -2001 budget has included provision for City
expenses in connection with this event
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Letter dated December 28, 2000 from Andrea Dahm
FISCAL IMPACT $460 00
Operating Budget
Amount Requested
Account Number:
Project Phase
Appropriation Required Yes _ No X
ORIGINATED DATE. January 10, 2001
Marlene Baker, Executive Assistant
REVIEWED BY' DATE. January 10, 2001
Mary Str n, City Manager
n„ n „jfk<� L,r, c�azoc 0 5 6 8
Andrea Dahm
Ceremonies Coordinator
El Segundo Little League
PO Box 112
El Segundo, CA 90245
(310) 322 -8883 / (310) 640 -3373
December 28, 2000
A ECEIvI
DEC 2 8 a
CITY MANAGERS W C1
To the Honorable Maeor Mike Gordon and the El Segundo City Council Members,
Th„ is a request to he put on the agenda for the next City council meeting.
The El Segundo Little League needs your approval for opening day ceremonies on March 3, 2001 To
taahtate the opening day parade u e request that the following streets be blocked off from 9 00 am to
11 00 am The streets are From Eucahptus and Grand Ave West to Main St , North on Main St to
Pine Ave then East to Sheldon St
Please conracr me if WU have am questnom and to let me know when we are to be present for a city
council meearn,
S IIccreh,
i
\ni Dahm
(� 5 7
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE- January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION.
A resolution of the City Council of the City of El Segundo adopting a schedule of fees for
work or encroachment in the public right -of -way (no fiscal impact).
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt resolution
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION.
Chapter 12 04 of the City Municipal Code stipulates that "a permit shall be required for
any work or encroachment in the public right -of -way, and the permittee shall pay to the
City a permit fee, a fee for subdivision plan checks, or Underground Service Alert
(USA), as applicable" The Municipal Code further provides for these fees to be
established by City Council from time to time by resolution The current fee schedule
was established by previous City Council Resolutions 3574 (adopted on January 3,
1989) and 3578 (adopted on January 17, 1989)
(Please see the attachment for additional discussion)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Additional discussion
2 Resolution for adoption
3 Previous fee Resolutions 3574 and 3578
FISCAL IMPACT. None
Operating Budget:
Amount Requested
Account Number
Project Phase
Appropriation Required. No
ORIG
REVIEWED BY
61W-4" Date: JAN 8 2001
Date.
L/ 2�0
PW- COUNCIL 01WANUARY16 11 (Friday 1/5/01 200 P M )
058
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION
Fiscal Impact:
In a typical year, the Public Works Department issues approximately 100 permits for
private work in the public right -of -way and receives an average revenue of
approximately $15,000 /year for permit and inspection costs The proposed fee
program is not intended for additional revenue generation, but rather represents a more
simplified and customer friendly method of calculating the fees to reasonably recover
City costs to provide the service In the proposed program, inspection fees are based
on the amount of work for which a permit is requested The actual time expended to
complete a particular improvement may vary from permit to permit, however the
proposed fee program is based on an average amount of effort expended by City staff
for a particular work category There is no fiscal impact from the implementation of this
program
Current Program:
The current program provides for a three -tier permit structure depending on the
development being (a) commercial exceeding 15,000 square feet, (b) commercial equal
to or less than 15,000 square feet and multi - family buildings more than six (6) units and,
(c) residential single family and multi - family six (6) units or less.
At the time of issuing the permit, an inspection and security deposit is charged to the
applicant At the completion of the permitted work, the City's actual costs (based on
staff inspection time expended on the project) are calculated and any remaining funds
from the collected deposit are returned to the applicant
Disadvantages of the Current Program:
(a) The contractor and the property owner do not know the inspection costs at the
time the permit is issued
(b) The contractor, at the time of permit issuance, pays an inspection deposit and
sometimes may include this deposit in the price to do the property owner's work
At the completion of work, unused inspection funds are returned to the contractor
and the contractor has the opportunity to keep the returned funds rather than
returning them to the property owner
(c) The current program involves considerable staff time to keep track of time spent
on each permit fob, calculate the refund amount, and to process the refunding of
the deposit
(d) The current three -tier fee structure is confusing to contractors and property
owners
PW- COUNCILIJANUARY16 06 (Fnday 1 /5/01 900 AM)
Proposed Program
Permit Issuance Fee:
The purpose of this fee is to recover the cost of issuing the permit, including staff time
for verification of insurance documents, simple counter plan checks, discussions with
the applicant, collecting and processing the fee payment and final close out of the
permit
Currently, the permit fee is $140 (commercial more than 15,000 square feet), $90
(commercial $15,000 square feet or less, multi -family more than six (6) units) and $50
(residential single family multi -family six (6) units or less) The estimated staff time for
issuing a permit is an average total of 1 5 hours for residential work and four (4) hours
for non - residential / commercial work
Recommended permit issuance fee for residential development would be $501 permit
and for commercial (non - residential) development would be $140 / permit
Inspection Fee:
The purpose of this fee is to recover the costs for providing field inspection and work
monitoring services to verify compliance of the construction work with City standards
and requirements
Currently, an inspection deposit is collected at the time of permit issuance. During
inspection, the inspector keeps track of actual time spent on the lob At the end of the
permitted work, the City's actual costs for staff time and equipment changes are
calculated and charged to the deposit Any unused funds are returned to the permittee
The proposed method of charging the inspection fee is based on the quantities and
scope of the proposed work regardless of the nature of development. With this method,
a fixed amount is collected at the time of permit issuance and the time keeping and
deposit refund chores are eliminated Also, the permittee and the property owner know
the exact inspection cost at the time of application
(a) Sidewalk and Street Curb /Curb and Gutter:
Regardless of the quantity of work, a minimum of three (3) separate inspection
visits are necessary for each improvement at one -half hour per visit representing
a total staff cost of $85 00 A typical residential property with a 50' wide street
frontage would be charged an inspection fee of $85 for construction of each of
these improvements abutting the property
Recommended inspection fees
Sidewalk = $1 00 per LF with a minimum $85.00 per location
Curb, Curb and Gutter = $1 00 per LF with a minimum $85 00 per location
3 PW -0OUNCILUANUARVIB O6 (Fnday 1/5101 9 DO AM) 060
(b) Driveway:
Regardless of the width, driveway work involves separate steps in constructing
the depressed street curb, driveway apron and street pavement patching. A total
of three (3) separate inspection visits, at one -half hour per visit, representing a
total staff time of one and one -half hours at a cost of $85.00 is estimated for this
work, if the work does not include construction of a depressed curb. An
additional one (1) hour of inspection is estimated for work that includes
construction of a depressed curb in conjunction with the driveway work
Recommended inspection fee for driveway work (without a depressed curb) _
$85.00 /each driveway
Recommended inspection fee for driveway work (with a depressed curb) _
$140 00 / each driveway
(c) House Sewer Lateral Connection to an Existing Sewer Main in Street:
The inspection work involves three (3) separate inspection visits of one (1) hour
each for construction of the sewer connection and two (2) separate additional
inspections of one -half hour each for inspecting the compaction of trench and
restoration of street pavement, representing a total staff time of four (4) hours at
a cost of $225 00
Recommended inspection fee for house sewer lateral connection to an existing
City sewer main would be $225 00 for each connection.
(d) House Sewer Connection to Existing Sewer Lateral:
The inspection work involves two (2) separate inspections of one (1) hour each
for making a new house sewer connection to an existing lateral and an additional
one half (1/2) hour of inspection for associated pavement inspection,
representing a total staff cost of $145 00
Recommended inspection fee for house sewer connection to an existing sewer
lateral would be $145 00 for each connection
(e) Temporary Encroachment:
Temporary encroachment permits for up to thirty (30) days upon the public right -
of -way are required for placement of trash dumpsters on the street abutting a
construction site, storage of materials and /or equipment, and partial blocking of
streets to accommodate heavy construction. This category will also include
property owner improvements on the public parkway and other miscellaneous
encroachments on the public street right -of -way
The inspection work involves periodical checking of the encroachment to verify if
the area is secure with barricades and at the end of encroachment to verify that
the area has been cleaned up Encroachment permits are valid for thirty (30)
PW- COUNCILUANUARY16 o6 (Fnday 115/01 9 00 A M)
061
days and for a total of two (2) hours of staff inspection effort, representing
$115 00 per encroachment are typically expended
Recommended inspection fee- $115.00 / encroachment
(f) Underground Service Alert (USA):
State law (Assembly Bill No 73) requires local agencies to locate and mark
underground installations upon notification by an excavator. This law also
provides for the local agency to charge a fee to recover its costs to provide this
service
For El Segundo, the underground installations to be located and marked upon
USA notification are the City's storm drain, sewer and water mains The City's
cost to provide this service is different for spot excavations and for long trench
excavations, such as utility trenches Typically, approximately one (1) hour of
staff time is expended for a single spot excavation, or to provide the service for a
trench 100 feet long At an estimated cost of $50 per every 100 feet the cost of
this service translates to 0 50 /LF
Recommended USA fee $0 50 / one LF of trench with a minimum $50 00 per
location
(g) Subdivision Plan Checks:
The current fee structure provides for $245 (commercial more than 15,000
square feet), $150 (commercial 15,000 square feet or less, multi- family more
than six (6) units) and $80 (single family multi -family six (6) units or less), based
on the three -tier permit fee structure The staff time expended for these plan
checks is the same regardless of the nature of development Furthermore, the
current fee structure needs to separately address plan checking of parcel maps
and tract maps, and off -site improvement plans which require different amounts
of staff effort
(i) Parcel Maps and Tract Maas:
Under an agreement with the City, the Los Angeles County Department of
Public Works performs plan checks to verify the mathematical accuracy
and technical compliance of the map. The developer pays a fee for this
service directly to the County
The Public Works Department reviews these maps, obtains all needed
City signatures and City Council approval as needed. The staff time
typically expended for this effort is two (2) hours representing $70 00
Recommended fee for processing parcel maps and tract maps
$70 00 / map
PW- COUNCILQANUARY16 06 (Fnday 115101 9 00 A M )
062
(ii) Off -site Improvement Plan Checks:
Some developments are required to design and install improvements in
the public right -of -way as a condition of approval of the development The
engineering plan check effort involved prior to issuing the construction
permit is estimated to average approximately two (2) hours per sheet of
design plans which includes one (1) field visit to the fob site, representing
$7000
Recommended fee for off -site improvement plan checks: $7000/
sheet of plans relative to work in the public right -of -way.
(h) Work by Public Utility Companies:
The current program includes permit fee and inspection charges to public utility
companies (Southern California Edison, Gas and Telephone Companies, fiber
optics conduit installation, oil company pipelines, etc.) equal to those charged to
developer's work in the public right -of -way This program further provides an
option for public utility companies to obtain an "annual permit" for $2,000 to
perform routine maintenance and testing work without obtaining a separate
permit for each instance The inspection charges for this work is invoiced
annually to the utility company
A separate permit is required from the utility companies for installation of a new
facility or major modifications to an existing facility
The City's cost to provide this service is directly related to the length of the
trenching proposed by the utility company with a minimum cost to inspect spot
excavations Typically, approximately one (1) hour of staff time is expended for
every localized spot excavation up to a length of 100 feet.
Recommended fee for utility cuts
Individual permit fee = $ 140
Permit fee - annual permit fee = $2,000
Inspection fee = $0 50 /LF of trench with a minimum
$50.00 per location
Advantages of the Proposed Program:
(a) The inspection costs are estimated at the time the permit is issued based on the
quantity of work permitted rather than the staff time expended for inspection
The contractor and the property owner know the exact inspection costs when the
permit is issued
M- COUNOWANUARV7606 (Fn6ay V5101 BOO 0.M)
063
(b) The potential for the contractor to keep the refunded inspection deposit funds is
eliminated
(c) The proposed program will result in a more efficient use of staff time to
administer the program
(d) The proposed program eliminates the three -tier permit structure resulting in a
simpler and more customer friendly process.
Comparison with Neicihborina Cities:
A review of the Public Works fee program in neighboring Cities indicated that every City
had its own method of evaluating and assessing the permit and inspection fees, and
therefore an accurate comparison was not available. However, the fees proposed by
staff are generally in line with fees charged by neighboring Cities and is based on
reasonable staff effort needed to provide the service for like items of work.
PW- COUNCILUANUARY16 06 (Fnday 1/6/01 B 00 A M)
G64
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA
ADOPTING A SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR WORK
OR ENCROACHMENT IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY
WHEREAS, the City Municipal Code Chapter 12 04 stipulates that a permit shall
be required for any work or encroachment In the public right -of -way and that the permittee shall
pay a fee for the permit, subdivision plan checks, or Underground Service Alert (USA) fee as
applicable, and
WHEREAS, the City Municipal Code Chapter 12 04 further provides for the City
Council to establish the above fees from time to time by resolution, and
WHEREAS, the attached Schedule of Fees is recommended to the City Council
to recover City costs for Issuance of the permit and for Inspecting the work or encroachment in
the public right -of -way
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS-
SECTION 1. The Schedule of Fees established by Resolutions 3574 and 3578
relating to work or encroachment in the public right -of -way is hereby rescinded
SECTION 2 The Schedule of Fees referred hereto and made a part hereof as
Exhibit "A ", is hereby approved and adopted as the Schedule of Fees for work or encroachment
in the public right -of -way
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution, shall enter the same In the book of original resolutions of said City, and shall make a
minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City
Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2000
Mike Gordon, Mayor
ATTEST. of the City of El Segundo, California
Cindy Mortesen
City Clerk
(SEAL)
A� PPRO S TO FORM.
Mark D Hensley
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO
SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR WORK OR
ENCROACHMENT IN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY
PAGE NO 1
065
EXHIBIT "A"
(to Resolution No )
Schedule of Fees for Work or Encroachment in the Public Right -of -Way
I. Permit Issuance Fee $50 per permit - residential
$140 per permit - non - residential / commercial
II Inspection Fee
(a) Sidewalk
$1-00 per linear foot with a minimum of $85 00 per location
(b) Street Curb /Curb and Gutter
$1 00 per linear foot with a minimum of $85 00 per location
(c) Dnvewav
$ 85 00 per driveway without a depressed curb
$140 00 per driveway with a depressed curb
(d) House Sewer Lateral Connection to Existina City Sewer Main
$225 00 per connection
(e) House Sewer Connection to Existina Sewer Lateral
$145 00 per connection
(f) Temporary Encroachment
$115 00 per encroachment
(g) Underground Service Alert (USA)
$0 50 / LF of excavation or trench with a minimum $50 00
II Subdivision Plan Checks
(a) Parcel Maps I Tract Maps
$70 00 / per map
(b) Off -site Improvement Design Plans
$70 00 per sheet of design plans relative to work in the public right -of -way
III Utility Cuts
Individual Permit = $140 / permit
Annual permit for routine maintenance work = $2000 / year
Inspection fee = $0 50 / LF of trench length with a
minimum $50 00 per location
NRESOSIEXHIBIT -AFEE (12n2100)
'16
RESOLUTION NO. 3574
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EL SEGUNDO, CAL1FOPN- -A, ADOPTING SCHEDULES
OF FEES FOR WORK 1N THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF FAY,
AND FOR APPLICATION AND PROCESSING OF
BUILDING, PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL PERMITS,
PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS, AND ZONING FEES.
WHEREAS, City Council Ordinance No. 1130, adopted January '3,
1999 establishes that all fees for work in the public right of way,
and for application and processing of building, plumoing, and
-eohanical permits, plats anc subdivisions, and zoning fees be
fixed and established by City Council from tine to time by
resolution; and
W�iEREAS, the attached Scheoules of Fees are recommended to the
City Council to cover costs and work done in the public right of
..ay, and for application and processing of building, plumbing, and
recnanical permits, plats and subdivisions, and zoning fees.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL
SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
sECTION 1. The Sched,,.:es of Fees, referred hereto and made
a part nereof as Exhibits A, B, C, D and E are hereby approved and
acopted as the Schedules of Fees for work in the public right of
-ay, and for application and c_ocessing of building, plumbing, and
-_c,anical permits, plats and subdivisions, and zoning fees.
SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the
effective date of Ordinance No 130.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of
original resolutions of said city; and shall make a minute of the
passage and adoption thereof in the record of the proceedings of
the City Council of said city, in the minutes of the meeting at
wnich the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on January 1989.,/
Mayor of the CIty of El Segundo,
California
ATTEST•' �� ���
� �_� City Cler (SEAL)
067
Ln
^ NE
L
.o
u\
ro o
L N
u rJ
G a
wI
=1�
�I
N
Y
>r
ro
E
d
a
Iy
I
J
- G
C
L O
O. u
R
C) U
d O
0
q
0
c >
O 3
i 1
Y [ W
L ro p o
U L
L R C)
0 0 0
�+ L C
U N
J C U -
U - 7 ✓:
I Of
U y L
CL C L E
N O R L L
C••+L d d
W U dL
CD
H
y v
U ++
Nt
d
a
+ N
.+ m
taLa
7 O V
y 1.1 ro
U j -:
C J U
N
U
y + �
U L
ro C ro
x ro
m L U
J
;J
L
•+ N ro
x U N
. y
rz L
7 C ro L
V f�
G = + U
Y �
L r
O 3
3 1
w
W aJ L p
a oe
r _ C
J 7 U ry
U ro U
U p O
n L r U
N U J i
L = rn
••+ O V G 41
L
d
L L
d
O d
v_
[s. try
0
N
H
V)
Q
N
0
O
C N
O
U 0 O
N d
" N
> U
0 C U
ro S
7 9L w
vlGm
[
L O
d �
Lu
ro
G7 O
[LL J
O
In
r-+
un
N
N
m
b �
c o
7 C7 •-+
O U O
L • .
t7 > e
L L p
CD
to
� ry
C --I
L U
G d L
U] .-1 VI
=Gw
y
[ W
R L+
JJ L O N
C U 4. td
O
ra
O
O
N
ro
N ro N O
N U ••+
ro_GW
O
d m EQ
p > >
N.•
N
u
R
r•1
O
V
C
M
w
L
ro
N
d
L
7
fT
.^1
W
-r
.r
ro N E C
C
roar,.
N
rt
y ,....• 1 lD
N
_
7 7
L
6
Ij ✓; 3 -� f 3
0
L
I^
r N
ro
r^ C N
O
LO
1-
I^ U...
�
IBC C
L -
rFr
I
I
L
U1
O
Iy
I
J
- G
C
L O
O. u
R
C) U
d O
0
q
0
c >
O 3
i 1
Y [ W
L ro p o
U L
L R C)
0 0 0
�+ L C
U N
J C U -
U - 7 ✓:
I Of
U y L
CL C L E
N O R L L
C••+L d d
W U dL
CD
H
y v
U ++
Nt
d
a
+ N
.+ m
taLa
7 O V
y 1.1 ro
U j -:
C J U
N
U
y + �
U L
ro C ro
x ro
m L U
J
;J
L
•+ N ro
x U N
. y
rz L
7 C ro L
V f�
G = + U
Y �
L r
O 3
3 1
w
W aJ L p
a oe
r _ C
J 7 U ry
U ro U
U p O
n L r U
N U J i
L = rn
••+ O V G 41
L
d
L L
d
O d
v_
[s. try
0
N
H
V)
Q
N
0
O
C N
O
U 0 O
N d
" N
> U
0 C U
ro S
7 9L w
vlGm
[
L O
d �
Lu
ro
G7 O
[LL J
O
In
r-+
un
N
N
m
b �
c o
7 C7 •-+
O U O
L • .
t7 > e
L L p
CD
to
� ry
C --I
L U
G d L
U] .-1 VI
=Gw
y
[ W
R L+
JJ L O N
C U 4. td
O
ra
O
O
N
ro
N ro N O
N U ••+
ro_GW
O
d m EQ
p > >
N.•
N
u
R
r•1
O
V
C
M
w
L
ro
N
d
L
7
fT
.^1
W
-r
.r
It
RESOLUTION No. 3578
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF i9E CITY OF
E1 SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING SCHEDULE OF °EES
FOR WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY BY PUBLIC
L::L:TY COMPANIES.
WHEREAS, the City Council on January 3, 1989 adopted
Resolution No. 3574 establishing schedules of fees for work
in the public right -of -way, and for application and processing
of building, plumbing and mechanical permits, plats and
suod.visions, and zoning fees; and
WHEREAS. the City Council recognizes that some work done
b, n_o_ic Utility Companies is not applicable to the fee
scned�ie established by Resolution r:o. 3574 and that a separate
fee schedule is necessary for routine maintenance and operations
work and for work not applicable to the fee schedule established
by Resolution No. 3574 performed by the utility companies; and
WHEREAS, City Council Ordinance No. 1130. adopted January 3,
1989 establishes that all fees for work in the public right -of-
way, and for application and processing of building, plumbing,
and mechanical permits, plats and subdivisions, and zoning fees
be f.xed and established by City Council from time to time by
resolution, and
WHEREAS, the attached Schedule of Fees is recommended to the
City Council to cover application and processing costs for work
done in the public right -of -way by the Public Utility Companies.
hOW, THERE-ORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
Zk- :'ORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SE C::ON 1. The Schedule of Fees, referred hereto and made
a part hereof as Exhibit A -1 is hereby approved and adopted as the
Scned -le of 'ees for work in the public right -of -way by the Public
ut-Ltv Companies.
SE 7:ON 3. This resolution shall become effective on the
�f.°ective date of Ordinance No. 1130.
SE=10N 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of
original resolutions of said city; and shall make a minute of the
passage and adoption thereof in the record of the proceedings of
the City Council of said city, in the minutes of the meeting at
which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 17th day of gnua989
w �
Mayor o the City--o E1 Segundo,
California
1 I AT'ti 5-
City Clerc
Exhibit A -1
Schedule of Fees for Work Done
In the Public Rioht —of —Way by Public Utility Companies
1. Fees for new installations in
development shall be charged
Resolution No. 3574.
connection with existing or new
as established by City Council
2. An annual blanket permit may be issued for performing routine
maintenance and operations such as potholing, drilling and filling
of bar holes for leak inspections, repair and /or replacement of
existing underground facilities that do not result in a change in
the alignment on size of the facilities and emergency work.
The annual blanket permit fee shall be $2,000.00.
Inspection Fee:
3. Fees for new installations
facilities which result in
facilities, when such work
developments identified in
Council Resolution No. 357
follows:
Actual Direct Labor Cost x 1.8 +
vehicle charges
or for replacement of existing
a change in the alignment or size of the
is not performed in connection with
the fee schedule established by City
4, for each location, shall be as
Perrit 'Fee: $90
I- spection Fee: Actual Direct Labor Cost x 1.8 +
vehicle charges
U.S.A. Underground Alert Fee (:f applicable ): $15
4. At the option of the Public Utility Company, wort. Parn+rted under
the annual blanket permit procedure may be performed individually
by paying the fees establishes? under :tent 3 of this schedule.
070
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING:COnsent Calendar
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Agreement for Professional Services between Moreland & Associates, Inc and
the City of El Segundo to provide accounting services during a staff leave of
absence in the Accounting Division of the Finance Department
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
Approve Agreement for Professional Services between Moreland & Associates,
Inc and the City of El Segundo
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
Due to a staff leave of absence, temporary professional accounting services are
required from December 13, 2000 to April 6, 2001 in the Accounting Division of
the Finance Department Ms Marian Alter is an employee of Moreland &
Associates, Inc and is currently performing the accounting services at a
satisfactory level
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Exhibit A Scope of Services between Moreland & Associates, Inc and the City of
El Segundo
FISCAL IMPACT Not to Exceed $20,000
Operating Budget
$20,000
Amount Requested,
$20,000
Account Number
001 -400- 2502 - 6214,001- 400 - 2502 -4201
Project Phase
Approval of Agreement
Appropriation required
No
Tim Walker, Accounting Manager
Bret Plumlee, Director of Finance
uary a, zuui
DATE January
n, City Manager ��/
071
1/8/01 1 51 PM 1 O
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
December 12, 2000
Mr Jim Walker
Accounting Manager
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Dear Mr Walker
1201 DOVE STREET SUITE 660
NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA 92660
(969) 221-0025
570 RANCHEROS DRIVE SUITE 260
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
(760) 7523390
In accordance with your request, we are providing this letter of understanding regarding the
accounting services to be provided by Moreland & Associates, Inc to the City of El
Segundo
We will provide the services of Ms Marian Alter to serve as your Senior Accountant starting
December 13, 2000 and lasting through April 2001 You believe you will require the
services of Ms Alter three days each week I have previously informed you that she will
not be available the week of February 12`h I am also informing you she will not be available
the week of December 25th due to prior commitments
It should be understood that during the performance of these services Ms Alter shall at all
times be an independent contractor who is covered by our Workers' Compensation
insurance At any time during the performance of these services, you will be able to
terminate these services for any reason including dissatisfaction with the services provided.
We ask that you provide us with two weeks notice before the services are terminated or a
significant change is made in the level of service You may extend these services by our
mutual agreement
The fee for the services of Ms Alter will be at the rate of $55 per hour Our services will be
billed on approximately the first day of the month for services provided during the prior
month
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services Please call at your convenience if
you have any questions Kindly acknowledge that our understanding of this engagement is
accurate by signing and returning one copy of this letter for our files
Very truly yours ACCEPTANCE BY THE
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
MORELAND & ASSOCIATES, INC
By_
Michael C Moreland, Partner Date
t 1, 072
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent
AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Municipal Area Express (MAX) Capital Reserve MOU
Amendment
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION. Adopt and Execute the MAX Capital Reserve
MOU Amendment
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: The MAX Policy Steering Committee approved
the amendment to the Capital Reserve MOU at their December 4, 2000 meeting
Under the MAX guidelines, the member agencies are required to adopt and
execute the agreement (attached) The amendment adds a fourth year to the
original three year agreement The purpose of the original capital reserve
account was to finance the local share of the cost to replace the MAX fleet of 14
buses in the year 2001 The member agency contribution schedule is included
as Attachment A The amended MOU will extend the period of the capital
reserve fund from three to four years in order to increase the local share from
$690,900 to $921,200 for the replacement of the fleet in year 2002 This
extension was necessary in order to accumulate sufficient funds to replace all
fourteen buses
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Lead Agency (Torrance) Staff report to
MAX Policy Steering Committee, Amendment to MOU for Prop A &C Local
Return Capital Reserve MAX, Duplicate original of MOU for Prop A &C Local
Return Capital Reserve MAX
FISCAL IMPACT- Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Operating Budget:
Amount Requested*
Account Number
Project Phase.
Appropriation Required•
$ 41,300
$ 19,729
112 - 400 - 5298 -8104
Yes
Greg 4ffson, Recreation and Parks Director
Mary Strefin, City Manager
DATE
DATE January 2, 2001
7 ®f
1I
v7S
ITEM 3C
November 27, 2000
TO: MAX Policy Steering Committee
December 4, 2000 Meeting
FROM: Lead Agency Staff
SUBJECT: Amendment to MOU for Proposition A & C Local Return Capital Reserve
for the Municipal Area Express (MAX)
RECOMMENDATION
The Staff Task Force recommends that the Policy Steering Committee adopt the Amended
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between MAX and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (MTA) for the Prop A & C Local Return Capital Reserve
BACKGROUND
In July 1998, an MOU between MAX and the MTA was executed to establish a three -year Prop
A & C Local Return Capital Reserve fund for the purpose of establishing a capital reserve
interest - bearing fund in the amount of $690,900 in Prop A & C Local Return funds that would
finance the local share of the cost of replacing the MAX fleet of 14 buses in the year 2001 The
Amended MOU will extend the period of the capital reserve fund from three to four years for the
purpose of aggregating the necessary local share of $921,200 for the replacement of MAX
buses in the year 2002
ANALYSIS
The original MOU executed in July 1998 established a three -year capital reserve fund for the
purchase of MAX replacement buses The capital reserve fund began on July 1, 1998, and
funds were to be expended by July 1, 2001, or the funds would lapse unless prior to the lapsing
date, the MTA approved to extend the term of the reserve
Due to policy set forth by the MTA Board of Directors, the MTA may only execute an MOU for a
three -year term The original MOU for the capital reserve fund was established for a three -year
period with an understanding between MAX and the MTA that an amended MOU would be
necessary to add an additional year to the capital reserve fund
A four -year capital reserve fund is required to establish a fund that can adequately aggregate
the necessary local share of the cost totaling $921,200 for the replacement of MAX buses With
an additional year added to the capital reserve fund, the fleet of 14 buses will be replaced in the
year 2002 as stated in Attachment B
The amendment to the original MOU also extends the date by which capital reserve funds must
be expended before lapsing from July 1, 2001 to July 1, 2002 If the reserve funds are not
expended by July 1, 2002, any unexpended funds will automatically lapse unless prior to the
lapsing date, the MTA has approved to extend the term of the capital reserve
074
ITEM 3C
The contribution of each agency to the capital reserve fund will be the same amount in the
fourth year of the MOU (FY 2001 -02) as in the third year (FY 2000 -01) Attachment A -1 of the
amended MOU conveys the agency contribution schedule for each of the seven agencies
representing MAX
Respectfully submitted,
By
CONCUR
Tom Whittle
Transit Director
Attachments
Jim Mills
MAX Program Coordinator
Amendment to MOU for Prop A & C Local Return Capital Reserve MAX
Duplicate Original of MOU for Prop A & C Local Return Capital Reserve MAX
2
75
AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE CITIES OF TORRANCE, LOMITA, LOS ANGELES, LAWNDALE, EL
SEGUNDO, RANCHO PALOS VERDES, COUNTY of LOS ANGELES AND
THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
This Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding (this "Amendment "),
is dated as of April 5, 2000, by and between the Cities of Torrance, Lomita, Los
Angeles, Lawndale, El Segundo, Rancho Palos Verdes, the County of Los Angeles
(collectively, the agencies) and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority ( "MTA ")
RECITALS
A The Agencies, except for the City of Lomita, and the MTA entered into
that certain Memorandum of Understanding No MOU POMAXTOR, dated July 1, 1998
(the "Existing MOU "), which Existing MOU provides for Local Return Capital Reserves
for bus replacement and
B The City of Lomita desires to loin the remaining cities in establishing a
capital reserve fund
C The Agencies and MTA desire to amend the Existing MOU as
provided herein
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1 Paragraph "FUNDING" of the Existing MOU is hereby amended by
deleting the paragraph in its entirety and replacing it with the following new Paragraph.
The Agencies will establish one capital reserve fund and will allocate an aggregate
amount of $921,200 of Proposition A Local Return funds pursuant to the schedule
attached as Attachment A -1 for the purchase of buses as specifically described in
Attachment B ( "Project Description ") All interest accumulated on funds placed in the
Capital Reserve fund shall accrue to that fund and be used for the project. The City of
Torrance shall act as lead agency for the Agencies and shall be responsible for
maintaining the Capital Reserve fund on behalf of the Agencies
2 Attachment A is hereby deleted and replaced with Attachment A -1
attached hereto
07G
3 The second sentence of the paragraph 7ERM/LAPSING of FUND" of
the Existing MOU is hereby amended by deleting the sentence in its entirety and
replacing it with the following new sentence. If the capital reserve funds are not
expended by July 1, 2002, then any unexpended funds will automatically lapse unless
prior to the lapsing date, the MTA has approved to extend the term of the reserve.
4 Except as expressly amended hereby, the Existing MOU remains in
full force and effect as originally executed All rights and obligations of the parties
under the Existing MOU that are not expressly amended by this Amendment shall
remain unchanged by this Amendment
077
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed and delivered as of the above date
City of El Segundo
John Gaines
City Council Member
Approved as to form
078
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
Julian Burke
CEO
Approved as to form
Lloyd W Pellman
County Counsel
073
ATTACHMENT A -1
AGENCY CONTRIBUTION SCHEDULE
Agency
Share (Ifirst
2 FYS)
Share (FY
last 2 FYs)
FY 98/99
FY 99100 FY 00101
FY 01102
Total
Torrance
37 086%
36 476%
S 85 407
S 85,407
S 84 003
S 84 003
S 338,620
City of Los Angeles
33 096 %I
32 552 °b
$ 76 218
$ 76.218
S 74 966
$ 74 966
S 302 367
Lawnaate
1 672 °�
T-&45%
S 3 851
S 3 851
$ 3 787
$ 3,787
$ 15,276
El Segundo
B 710%
B 567Y°
$ 2 0,059
$ 20 059
!F 19 729
S 19.729
$ 79,576
Los Anaeles County
3 245%
3 792%
S 7,473
S 7 473
$ 7,350
$ 7,350
$ 29.646
Rancno Palos verses
76 191 °h
15 925%
$ 37 287
$ 77287
S 36 674
S 36 674
$ 147 922
Lomita
na
t 544 °,6
na
na
$ 3786
S 3.786
$ 7,572
c oo1 4an
Total
080
Page 1
ATTACHAENT B
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project establishes a Capital Reserve interest - bearing account begiiuung in FY 98/99
for the purpose of financing the local share of the cost of replacing the Municipal area
Express (MAX) fleet of 14 buses in the year 2002
081
CAPITAL RESERVE
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
ESTABLISHING THE CITIES OF TORRANCE , LOS ANGELES, LAWNDALE,
EL SEGUNDO, RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CAPITAL RESERVE FUND
This Memorandum of Understanding is dated Jk � I 3¢ , 1998 and
is by and between the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
("MTA ") and the Cities of Torrance, Los Angeles, Lawndale, El Segundo, Rancho Palos
Verdes and the County of Los Angeles (collectively, "the Agencies ")
WHEREAS, the Agencies are prepared to commit and accumulate Proposition A _
Local Return funds to be used exclusively for bus purchase as agreed to by all the parties
WHEREAS, at its regular October 1998 meeting, the MTA Board approved the
establishment of a Proposition A & C Local Return Capital Reserve account for the
purpose of purchasing transit buses for the Agencies `
NOW THEREFORE, the MTA and the Agencies agree as follows f--i
N)
FUNDING
The Agencies will establish one capital reserve fund and will allocate an aggregate
amount of $690,900 00 of Proposition A Local Return funds pursuant to the schedule
attached as Attachment A for the purchase of buses as specifically described in
Attachment B ( "Project Description ") All interest accumulated on funds placed in the
Capital Reserve fund shall accrue to that fund and be used for the project The City of
Torrance shall act as lead agency for the Agencies and shall be responsible for
maintaining the Capital Reserve fund on behalf of the Agencies
TERMILAPSING OF FUND
The capital reserve fund will begin as of Ju ( I44 P If the capital reserve funds
are not expended by July 1. 2001, then any unexpended funds will automatically lapse
unless prior to the lapsing date, the MTA has approved to extend the term of the reserve.
Before the end of the three (3) years, the MTA may evaluate the Capital Reserve account
as it pertains to the status of the project and projected amount of funds available
DUPLICATE
ORIGINAL 0K.,
If the project is delayed, the Agencies must request in writing to MTA approval to extend
the term of the Capital Reserve before the lapsing date. Without such approval, the
unexpended funds will automatically lapse.
This agreement will follow the conditions set forth in the Proposition A and C Local
Return Guidelines pertaining to the Capital Reserve process (collectively, the
"Guidelines'.
TERMINATION
If any party desires to terminate this agreement early and reprogram their contribution of
funds in the Capital Reserve account, such party may do so at the end of a given fiscal
year by giving written notice to the MTA and the lead agency of such intent to terminate
ninety (90) days prior to the end of any given fiscal year, which ends on June 30th. The
remaining parties to this agreement shall continue to maintain the capital reserve account
as provided herein
If the MTA terminates this agreement, in addition to the requirements in the Guidelines,
the capital reserve funds must be expended by each respective agency for the amount
contributed by such agency within three years from the time the MTA decision is made.
If the Agencies reprogram the funds, in addition to the requirements in the Guidelines, the
capital reserve funds must be expended by the original automatic lapsing date.
CONDITIONS
The MTA and the Agencies agree to abide by the requirements of the Guidelines, which
are incorporated herein by reference, including without limitation;
A. Submittal of Annual Project Update with updated Project Description Fortes;
B. Reprogramming funds, and
C. Annual Status Update
COUNTERPARTS
This Memorandum of Understanding may be executed simultaneously or in any number
of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall
construe one and the same instrument.
1:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is executed by the parties as follows
CITY OF TORRANCE
� - ly -v9
Dee Hardison DATE
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM
JOHN L FELLOWS III
City Attorney
By
Heather K Whitham DATE
Deputy City Attorney
ATTEST
S Herbers DATE
City Clerk
084
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is executed by the parties as follows
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN
TRANSIT AUTHORITY
APPROVED AS TO FORM
LLOYD W PELLMAN
County Counsel
By %1 1
'a6puty DATE
Deputy 'q Attorney
1 I U
085
ATTACHMENT A
AGENCY CONTRIBUTION SCHEDULE
$690,885.
O86
SHARE
FY 9/899
FY 99/00
FY 00/01
TOTAL
orrance
0.37086
$85,407
$85,407
$85,407
$256,221.
[AGENCY
ity of Los Angeles
0.33096
$76,218
$76,218
$76,218
$228,654.
awndale
0.01672
$3,851
$3,851
$3,851
$11,553.
El Segundo
0.0871
$20,059
$20,059
$20,059
$60,177.
Los Angeles County
0.03245
$7,473
$7,473
$7,473
$22,419.
Rancho Palos Verdes
0.16191
$37,287 1
$37,287
$37,287
$I11,86I.
$690,885.
O86
ATTACHMENT B
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project establishes a Capital Reserve interest - bearing account beginning in FY 98/99
for the purpose of financing the local share of the cost of replacing the Municipal Area
Express (MAX) fleet of 14 buses in the year 2001.
0 Fi
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE. January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION- Establishment of a professional service contract with
Christopher A Joseph and Associates (CAJA) to prepare an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for a proposed mixed -use project on a 46 5 -acre property
bounded by Manposa Avenue, Nash Street, Atwood Way, and Douglas Street
The amount to be paid to the consultant under this agreement is $116,850 00 The
full amount of the contract will be paid by the applicant of the project
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
1 Approve a professional services contract with CAJA to prepare an EIR;
2 Authorize staff to Increase contract by $8,500 if additional traffic counts are
required, and,
3 Authorize a ten percent contingency Increase In the contract If unanticipated
analysis Is needed
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION On November 16, 2000, the Planning Division
received a Development Agreement application (EA No 537, DA No 00 -3) for
1,650,000 square foot mixed -use project on the above described property The
project is similar to the previously proposed El Segundo Media Center project for
which the City Council had previously approved Contract No 2762 between the
City and RBF Consulting for professional services to prepare a Mitigated Negative
Declaration (EA No 515, DA No 00 -2) The applicant for the previously project
withdrew the application A new developer has submitted new applications for the
El Segundo Media Center project Staff has determined that an EIR would be
required for the new project
on next
ATTACHED
1 Draft Contract with CAJA in the amount of $116,850 00
FISCAL IMPACT
Amount Requested: $137,900 00 (Appropriation offset entirely by developer
deposit)
Account Number: Various (trust deposit account)
Project Phase: N/A
Appropriation required: Yes
O IGINATED DATE-
C? -77:D i
Chris Ketz, Planning pager
REVIEWED
Manager
�� 12
STAFF REPORT January 16, 2001 Page 2
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION. (cont.)
On November 15, 2000, Planning Division staff distributed a Request for Proposal
(RFP) for the preparation of an EIR for the proposed El Segundo Media Center
project The City received eight proposals by the December 4, 2000 deadline
Based on the criteria contained in the RFP, staff, in consultation with the applicant,
selected four candidate firms to interview on December 15, 2000 These firms
were Cotton/Bridges/Associates, Christopher A Joseph and Associates, EIP
Associates, and Impact Sciences
Based on the interviews and the submitted proposals, staff recommends that the
contract be awarded to Christopher A Joseph and Associates (CAJA) as the firm
most capable of carrying out the objectives of the project Staff recommends the
retention of CAJA based upon their knowledge of the subject property and their
proven ability to complete such projects in timely manner The firm and the project
managers who will lead the consultant team have experience working on large
mixed -use projects throughout Los Angeles and have worked on projects within El
Segundo Staff have worked with the firm before and are confident of their ability
to successfully complete the EIR
Staff also recommends that the applicant be required to submit the full amount of
the contract at the beginning of the project The funds would be placed in a trust
deposit account, which would be used to pay CAJA as their invoices are
submitted
Staff is requesting authorization for the expenditure of an $8,500 optional item in
the Scope of Services (Exhibit A- Page 10) in the event that additional traffic
counts (up to 20 intersections) for the proposed project are required Staff has not
yet determined if these would be required
Staff is also recommending that Council approve an additional contingency budget
of a maximum of ten percent of the contract amount (to be paid by the project
applicant) that staff can be authorized to expend for any unanticipated additional
analysis beyond the Scope of Services contained in the proposed contract
P \Planning & Budding Safety\PROJECTS \526550 \EA- 537\CAJA Contract ais doc
089
Christopher A Joseph & Associates
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
December) 2000
Because it is expected that the El Segundo Media Center Project EIR will be scrutinized by affected parties,
adjacent residents and surrounding communities, it is important that the potential environmental effects of
the project be fully analyzed Although any EIR can be challenged, a comprehensive approach using
appropriately conservative assumptions is likely to withstand any legal challenge that might be raised The
EIR must respond directly to issues raised by responsible agencies and community organizations An EIR
that provides thoughtful and well- documented responses to issues raised during the environmental review
process is the best means of allowing applicants to proceed with their projects in the most expeditious
manner
In order to assure that the resulting EIR is both analytically correct and legally defensible, the CAJA Team
will prepare a comprehensive and factual EIR that addresses existing conditions, project impacts, mitigation
measures, cumulative impacts and alternatives to the project, along with a complete initial Study which
provides full justification for the City of El Segundo to conclude that remaining issues not specifically
addressed in the EIR would not be significant Any potentially significant project impacts identified in the
Initial Study will be analyzed in detail in the FIR The EIR will be prepared based on the standards and
requirements of CEQA the State CEQA Guidelines (as amended most recently on October 26, 1998) and
the Cm of El Segundo The FIR will be prepared to meet the exacting standards of quality employed by
C AJ S in the preparation of our previous EIRs throughout Southern California
The following tasks would be performed by the CAJA team to prepare an EIR for the El Segundo Media
Center Project
Re%iew of Existine Information
CAJA will review existing information from all previous environmental reviews and
pertinent documentation and analyze to determine issues, findings and problem resolutions
that could be relevant to the EIR Such information will include previous environmental
review documents prepared for the project site such as the Federal Express Operations
Facility EIR and El Segundo Media Center Initial Study/Mingated Negative Declaration
(June 2000) A concerted effort will be made to utilize and incorporate as much existing
data as possible into the EIR
EIR Pi oposa! foi E! Segunao Nedra Cenier Project Page
090
Christopher A Joseph & Associates December 1 2000
2 Preparation of a Draft Initial Study
The Initial Study consists of a checklist which is used to identify areas where the proposed
project could potentially result in environmental impacts as well as areas where the
proposed project has no potential to result in impacts CAJA will prepare a Draft Initial
Study for the proposed project utilizing the City's Initial Study Checklist Form The Initial
Study will be comprised of a completed checklist and detailed responses to all questions,
with particular emphasis given to responses where the impact is not significant and the
response provided will serve as the primary record of the City's determination that the
impact is not significant The Initial Study is also a valuable tool in refining the scope of
the EIR and identifying any required technical reports for the proposed project
3 EIR Notices
CEQA includes prescribed noticing requirements to inform the public and other cognizant
agencies that documentation is being prepared for a project CAM will prepare the Notice
of Preparation (NOP) required by CEQA for the proposed project in the format used by
City and will circulate it to all identified commenting agencies and interested parties The
NOP will include a map of the project site, a brief description of the proposed project, and a
preliminary list of the em ironmental effects to be evaluated in the EIR
CAM will also assume responsibility of conducting a scopmg meeting with applicable City
and state agencies as cell as other interested parties The purpose of the scopmg meeting
will be to allo\& interested parties to comment on the environmental issues that could be
addressed in the EIR
A finalized scope for the Draft EIR will be defined after all comments on the NOP have
been received and the seeping meetings are concluded CAJA will work with the City to
determine if the comments expand the scope of work or require additional technical
sections to be included in the EIR The Initial Study, Notice of Preparation and all
correspondence receded in response to the NOP will be attached as an Appendix to the
Draft EIR
CAJA will also prepare and assist the City as required in circulating all other required
public notices including the Notice of Completion and Notice of Determination
4 Preparation of Administrative Draft EIR
An Administrative Draft EIR would be prepared for review by the City This subsection
outlines the major sections which would be included in the Administrative Draft EIR
FIR Aoposal for Fl Segundo tledta CCtaer Pro/tct page 2
u 9 1
Christopher A Joseph & Associates
41 SUMMARY
December / 1000
A tabular summary will be included as the first section of the EIR The
Summary will include an Introduction, Statement of Purpose and Need,
Description of the Proposed Project and Alternatives, and a tabular summary of
expected environmental effects In addition, a brief executive summary will also
be prepared as a separate document, and would consist of a short description and
background of the proposed project, as well as a listing of the environmental
impact findings recommended mitigation measures, and a summary evaluation
of alternatives
42 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The Introduction section of the EIR will include a narrative on the background of
the EIR process statement of purpose and need, development of the proposed
project and alternatives and a short summation of the environmental review and
project approval process The environmental setting will provide a physical
description of the project site and the surrounding area Existing improvements
and land uses «ill be described
The em ironmental setting will also provide a physical description of the project
site and the surrounding area A discussion and tabular list of related
projects/cumulative development will be presented, and the location of such
development µill be plotted on an area map A related projects 'list- based"
approach [CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b)(1)(A)] will be used to analyze
the potential cumulative impacts of the proposed project in conjunction with
other projected growth in the area
43 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
The project description will provide a detailed narrative and graphical
presentation of the provisions of the project, including proposed improvements
and architectural plans The project description will include a qualitative and
graphical description of the project location and boundaries including regional
and vicinity maps and aerial photos For CEQA purposes, the project description
will also include a statement of project objectives to be developed in conjunction
with the City
N7 P..>oo,al for El Se¢undo tfedia Ceruer Projrn Page 3
Christopher A Joseph & Associates December 1 :000
44 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION
As an introduction to this section of the EIR, each environmental impact area
determined not to have a potentially significant impact on the environment, as
identified in the Initial Study described above, will be listed, with an
accompanying discussion of the reasons for the determination
Each of the areas of potential impact will describe the existing conditions,
environmental impact after development of the proposed project and alternatives
recommended mitigation measures, net unmitigated environmental impact after
project development and cumulative impact
Existing Conditions Analysts of the existing environmental setting is necessary in
order to compare those conditions to any changes created and produced by the
proposed project and to identify any significant environmental effects of the
proposed project For purposes of environmental analysts within the EIR, the
environmental setting is defined as the physical conditions in the affected area as
they exist at the time the Notice of Preparation is published (State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15126 2, revised October 26, 1998)
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Protect Each of the environmental subject
areas would be eialuated to determine impact significance Under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a significant impact is defined as a
substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in the physical environment
The specific criteria or threshold of significance for determining the significance of
a particular impact would be identified in conjunction with the City prior to the
impact discussion in each issue section, and would be consistent with the new
critena set forth in the revised CEQA
Mitigation Measures Where applicable, mitigation measures would be presented
in each respective environmental subject area in the following classification
scheme
Mitigation Measures required to reduce an identified significant impact
to a less - than - significant level
* Non - Required Measures, mitigations that are recommended (but not
required) to further enhance environmental conditions within the project
and the surrounding locale, and which can reduce an identified non-
significant impact
E1R Proposal joI E1 StgWldo ltsLa Center Protect Page 4 093
Christopher A Joseph & Assouates
December] 2000
* Code - Required Measures required by local, regional, state and/or federal
regulations and statutes which must be imposed as conditions of project
approval Such code - required measures would be listed even though
they are not necessarily required to reduce identified impacts
Level of Impact After Mitigation A clear, concise statement of the level of impact
after the inclusion of mitigation measures will be presented Net impacts will be
defined as either "significant," or "less than significant "
Cumulative Impact The project's cumulative impacts in conjunction with
identified related developmenticumulative growth within and possibly outside the
City of El Segundo Related projects outside the City that might be included are
the Playa Vista Development and the LAX Master Plan It will be noted
throughout the cumulative impact discussions that such impacts generally represent
a worst -case scenario (higher than would be expected) because impact projections
for related projects are for the most part calculated without subtracting (netting out)
existing uses on related project sites Moreover, it is assumed for analytical
purposes that all related projects would be approved and developed within the time
frame of the proposed project In addition, each related project would likely be
subject to unspecified mitigation measures, which would also reduce cumulative
impacts
4 5 ALTERNATiVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT
CAJA will prepare an analysis of alternatives to the proposed project This
proposal assumes three alternatives to be analyzed in the EIR (includes No
Project Alternative) Such alternatives may include
• No Project (Existing Conditions)
• Reduced Project
• Alternative Site Plan Configuration
The requirements for these analyses are based on the "rule of reason" as dictated
by the California Environmental Quality Act and reflect the needs of each
particular project Specific alternative schemes will be determined upon
consultation with the City and City staff It is noted that several recent court
cases have been decided in California that can affect the scope of project
alternatives in EIRs The resulting court decisions have made the alternatives
analyses in EIRs more vulnerable to legal challenges which, in turn, has changed
the standards of adequacy for such analysts The reasoning behind the rejection
/H P1 upo,al for N Segundo Vedia Cewer Proiect
Page 5
'194
Christopher A Joseph & Associates
December ( 1000
of alternatives is typically based on the inability of the alternatives to meet the
project objectives
46 MITIGATION MONITORING
The EIR will also include a Draft Mitigation Monitoring Report as an Appendix
to the EIR This CEQA - required plan must be organized around City policies
and procedures The mitigation monitoring plan will list (1) project mitigation
measures (2) correlate the mitigation measures to the various governmental
actions that the implementation of the project will require and (3) identify the
City andior other governmental offices or departments that should monitor the
execution of the mitigations The Mitigation Monitoring Report will also
establish specific reporting requirements, enforcement procedures and penalties,
reporting forms and periodic monitoring schedules, consistent with the
established procedures of City
47 OTHER EIR SECTIONS
The EIR will also include the following required sections
• Summary of l na%oidable Significant Adverse Impacts
• Growth Inducing Impacts
• Organizations and Persons Consulted
• Report Preparation Personnel
5 Submittal of the Administrative Draft EIR to the City
Typical agency review involves approximately two drafts of the Administrative Draft
EIR The first Administrative Draft EIR is typically subject to the most extensive
comments, with the subsequent drafts usually requiring fewer comments The review and
correction cycle continues until the City has approved the Administrative Draft EIR for
publication as a Draft EIR for public circulation CAJA will provide five copies of the
Administrative Draft EIR on recycled paper to the City of review
6 Production and Circulation of the Draft EIR
When the City has approved the Administrative Draft EIR for release as a Draft EIR, CAJA
NN ill print 75 copies of the Draft EIR on recycled paper (and one camera -ready copy) and its
Technical Appendices One electronic copy of the Draft EIR will be provided to the City in
Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format as well as one electronic copy of the Draft EIR in Microsoft
Word 97 format CAJA will also be responsible for the circulation of the Draft EIR to the
K t'r an�„a/ to, FI Sc e��ndo ll, dm C en4 r Pr air a Page 6
09
Chrutopher A Joseph & Associates
December 1 2000
State Clearinghouse, identified commenting agencies and interested parties In addition,
CAJA will prepare and circulate the Notice of Completion for the Draft EIR
7 Preparation of the Final EIR
The Draft EIR will be circulated to the public for a mimmum of 45 days Following the
closure of the public comment period, CAJA will prepare the Administrative Final EIR
The Final EIR will consist of a summary, corrections, additions, and responses to
comments to the EIR Each comment received on the Draft EIR will be responded to to the
Final EIR The extent of work necessary to complete the Final EIR is contingent upon the
amount and nature of comments that are received after the Draft EIR is circulated For the
purposes of this proposal a is assumed that a workload of approximately 60 hours would
be required to complete the Final EIR Should responses to comments exceed the
anticipated workload, additional hours would be bulled on a time and materials basis, with
prior appro%al of the Cin
CAJA will begin preparation of the Final EIR immediately after circulation of the Draft
FIR commences Dunne the time the Draft EIR is being circulated for public comment, the
summary and corrections and additions sections of the Final EIR will be prepared Written
comments on the Draft EIR will be responded to as soon as they are forwarded to CAJA by
the lead agencies It is anticipated that some comments will be received before the end of
the public circulation period and that responses to these comments could be prepared
immediately upon receipt
CAJA will make changes to the preliminary Administrative Final EIR following its review
by the City When the City has approved the Administrative Final EIR for release as the
Final EIR, CAJA will print 50 copies (and one camera -ready copy) of the Final EIR and
circulate them to all appropriate agencies and individuals One electronic copy of the Final
EIR will be provided to the City in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format as well as one electronic
cop} of the Final EIR in Microsoft Word 97 format
If necessary, CAJA w ill prepare the Findings of Fact for any potentially significant impacts
that can be completely mitigated as well as a Statement of Overriding Considerations for
any significant unavoidable project impacts CAJA will also prepare and distribute the
Notice of Determination
S Protect Coordination/Public Participation
Successful preparation of the EIR will require effective communication between the City
and the EIR consultant CAJA's experience in managing other projects of sirrular scale and
complexity has shown that regular working meetings provide this type of communication
FIR Proposal lot El Segundo Atedia Center Proleci Page 7
0 9F
Christopher A Joseph & Associates
December 1 2000
Attendance at various public hearings will also be required as a part of the EIR process
CAJA has budgeted for a total of 10 meetings or hearings for all purposes over the course
of the ErR process Attendance at additional meetings or hearings would be billed on a
time and materials basis CAJA will also provide monthly progress reports on the EIR to
the City
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES TO BE ANALYZED IN THE EIR
Based on a survey of the project site, review of previous environmental documents for the project site, and
review of the RFP. CAJA would propose to analyze the following environmental issues in detail in the El
Segundo Media Center Project EIR
• Transportation/Traffic
• Air Quality
• Noise
• Geology and Soils
• Hydrology/Water Quality
• Land Use and Planning
• Aesthetics
• Public Services
• Utihrs° and Service Svstems
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials
• Population and Housing
The following pages provide a summary of the content and technical approach for each environmental
impact category which would be analyzed in a El Segundo Media Center Project EIR
Laird Use and Plannina
CAJA will eialuate the proposed project for compliance and consistency with established
plans, policies and regulations, including the City of El Segundo General Plan and Zoning
Ordinance, and the proposed Development Agreement This section will be supplemented
with graphic displays of existing and proposed land use and zoning in the project locale as
well as tabular comparisons of the project's compliance The project will also be evaluated
for compatibility with the existing and future land use patterns in the project locale The
project's functional and physical compatibility with surrounding uses will also be analyzed
Aesthetics
CAJA will e%aluate the aesthetic impacts from the proposed development The existing
N iew shed w ill be described from several different vantage points and perspectives
F[R Mopo3al7m £l Seeundo Wedia Cewo Piotrci Page 8
1)97
Christopher A Joseph & Associates
December l 2000
(foreground,nuddleground and background) The vantage points will be determined in
consultation with the City The project's impact on the vrewshed from the identified
vantage points will be evaluated Both panoramic and aesthetic qualities will be
addressed, including architectural and landscaping enhancements seen from within the
site Appropriate photographs and other illustrations will be included
The aesthetic qualities of the proposed project (including architectural enhancements,
decor, color, landscaping, building height impacts, the effects of building mass, intensity,
skyscape intrusions and other impacts) will be described. using architectural renderings
or other project graphics and narratives provided to CAJA by the project applicant
CAJA will also revie" the proposed project's aesthetic character in the context of
existing City of El Segundo General Plan policies that regulate and/or encourage various
aesthetic characteristics
Traniponattou and Circulation
Crain & Associates will prepare a project traffic study addressing project traffic impacts at up to
20 study intersections The project traffic study will include the following tasks
Task 4 - Scomne Meetine vv ith Cm of El Segundo Staff - Meet with the City's traffic engineering
representative to scope and develop the project traffic study parameters This will be
accomplished within approximately the first five days of the official authorization to
proceed (Cost S1 000)
Task B - Protect Traffic Study - Prepare a project traffic study based on the scoping requirements
of the City of El Segundo This study will include but not be limited to the following
• Em tronmental/transportation setting, including field survey observations,
• Description of study area street system and available public transit serving the area,
• Existing weekday AM and PM peak -hour traffic count information, as required by the
City of El Segundo (up to 20 study intersections estimated),
• Determination of weekday peak -hour project traffic impacts at study intersections,
• Research of related projects in study area, and analysis of cumulative traffic impacts for
proposed future study year,
• Calculate existing levels of traffic service at study intersections,
• Forecast of future year traffic conditions in the study area,
• Traffic generation using appropriate trip generation rates, trip distribution and trip
assignment for project traffic,
ElR Proposal rm El Se¢undo ilcdia Center Pro/cci Page 9
098
Christopher A Joseph & Associates December! 1000
o Capacity and level of service calculations at all study intersections, as required by the
City of El Segundo,
• Discussion of project access, circulation and parking issues
• Analysts and discussion of potential Congestion Management Program impacts and
issues,
• Impact analysts of conversion of Nash - Douglas one -way couplet to two -way operations
• Discussion of potential traffic mitigation measures,
• Analysis of traffic impacts of alternatives (trip generation only), and
o Recommendations and conclusions
(Cost of Traffic Study Not Including Counts $27,000)
If necessary, Crain & Associates w ill conduct new traffic counts at up to 20 study intersections
for an additional 58.500 Also, if more than 20 study intersections need to be analyzed, the
count collection and analysis per intersection can be performed for $1,200 per intersection
Task C - Meetmes/HeannesTresen tat ions - This task includes meetings with City staff, meetings
with Applicants team, meetings with and presentations to public officials and, if
necessary neighborhood groups and public hearings For purposes of this budget, a total
of 6 meetings and 3 public hearings are included (Cost $9,500)
Task D - Final FIR - Assist the FIR consultant with preparation of the Final EIR by responding
to comments received during the DEIR circulation period relating to traffic,
transportation parking and access issues This includes responses for a total of up to
20 transportation- related comments This task does not include any significant new
analyses or data collection (Cost S3,500)
If additional tasks are requested such as preparing conceptual designs of mitigation
measures revisions due to change in the scope of the project, or negotiations with the
adjacent and/or regional agencies we would be pleased to provide those services Separate
estimates of costs for each of those tasks or other tasks that the City may request can be
provided
Air Qualuy
In the preparation of the air quality technical report, Giroux & Associates will accomplish
the following
FIR Pi opwaI for El S. ¢undo Ai dm Center Project Page 10
090
Christopher A Joseph B Associates
Aoise
December 1 2000
• Using the previous analysts (e g Media Center MND and Federal Express EIR),
summarize recent air quality trends and identify any subsequent changes in the
air quality planning process
• Land uses and populations in the project site vicinity that are particularly
sensitive to air quality impacts will be identified
• Project construction and operational emissions of entena air pollutants will be
made in accordance with the procedures outlined in the current SCAQMD Air
Quality Handbook (1993)
• Using the project emission estimates, based upon the URB7G computer model,
an evaluation will be made of potential short-term and long -term impacts that
could result from project development as proposed
• Estimates kill be made for existing, future base -case, and project -case roadside
emissions of CO `hotspots" on intersections affected substantially by project
traffic (e g for Lei els of Service D or worse) The number of intersections to be
analyzed for CO "hotspots" will be determined by the amount of intersections
that are significantly impacted by project traffic
• A quantitative assessment of the effect of project development on achievement or
maintenance of state or federal air quality standards will be made
• Project conformitn with the draft 1997 AQMP will be evaluated and discussed
Growth projections incorporating the project will be compared to those in the
SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) and the El Segundo General Plan as
a basis for evaluating project consistency with AQMP inputs on area growth
• The potential effects on local air quality of cumulative development in the area
will be discussed
• Mitigation measures to reduce any identified adverse impacts resulting during
construction or operations of the project will be recommended, along with an
appropriate monitoring program
• Air qualm' impacts of alternatives will be compared to those of the proposed
project
As part of this task, Giroux & Associates will accomplish the following
• Limited on -site ambient noise monitoring will be used to update the baseline noise
characterization from previous environmental studies, and to provide input data to
prepare a site - specific calibration of the FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model
• The compatibility of the proposed uses with the current and projected noise
environment utll be generally discussed
• Short-term noise impacts associated with project construction will be discussed
I Proposal for D Sri ¢undo iredm Cent✓ Project
Page II
100
Christopher A Joseph & Associates
December 1 1000
• Likely changes in the noise environment after project development will be
quantitatively assessed This will include the evaluation of stationary noise
impacts and mobile source noise impacts on El Segundo area residents, and in
particular identified sensitive receptors
• Conformance requirements of project development with the City of El Segundo
General Plan Noise Element's noise/land use compatibility guidelines and local
and state regulations will be discussed
• Potential noise impact mitigation measures (e g berms, sound barriers) will be
developed, along with recommendations of an appropriate monitoring program,
for any potentially significant construction and/or operational noise impacts
• Noise impacts of alternatives will be compared to those of the proposed project
Geology and Sods
Our evaluation will include a review of our previous geotechnical reports for
investigations for immediately adjacent sites and available published and unpublished
literature, including the State of California Seismic Hazard Zone Maps and Earthquake
Fault Zone Maps, the County of Los Angeles Seismic Safety Element, and the City of El
Segundo Seismic Safety Element �k e will also review the EIR for a previously proposed
development at the site
Our proposed sery ices are div ided into two primary tasks as discussed below
Task 1— Geoloev and Soils
For this task, we will
Present on a geologic map the regional and local geologic setting of the site,
including the location of nearby faults,
Describe the topography of the site,
Describe the geologic character of the subsurface materials,
Determine and indicate the locations of known active or potentially active faults
in relation to the site on a geologic map,
Include a discussion of pertinent faults,
Evaluate potential hazards related to slope instability,
Evaluate the potential for subsidence,
Evaluate the potential for flooding and inundation, and
Discuss the general feasibility of the proposed project from a geotechnical and
geologic perspective
Task II— Setsmicrn
Based on the available seismic information, the report will provide information on the
following items
F I Pr oposai for El Srenndo kItdia Center Project
Page 11
iJl
Christopher A Joseph & Associates
December 1 .000
The historical seismicity of the region,
The potential for fault displacement at the site,
The effects of ground shaking, including the estimated peak ground accelerations
based on the Design Basis Earthquake (DBE),
The possibility of tsunamis and seiches affecting the site, and
The possibility of liquefaction, seismic settlement, or lurching occurring on the
site
Population and Housing
CAJA will assess potential impacts from the project on the location, distribution, density
growth rate or growth policies of the housing, population, and employment planned for
the area as specified in any applicable City of El Segundo plans, regional growth plan
and/or other officially adopted plan for the area in which the proposed project will be
located
UnItnes /Energy Conservation
CAJA will confer with appropriate personnel in the City of E1 Segundo and other
agencies (i e , Count} Sanitation Districts, private waste haulers) to determine if the
project can be satisfactorily served by the existing water distribution, sanitary sewer, and
solid waste col Iec ion/ disposal systems CAJA will also contact utility agencies with
regard to assessing the adequacy of natural gas and electricity services to be delivered to
the project site for proposed development This effort will include coordination with
Southern California Edison (SCE) regarding their ability to accommodate a proposed
electrical substation which would serve on -site telecommunication/web hosting facilities
CAJA will estimate construction and operational fuel consumption for the project Fuel
consumption estimates will be made based on data supplied by the traffic consultant
projections for vehicle miles traveled, and any appropriate reductions in VMT
attributable to transit and TDM measures in the project CAJA will also contact utility
agencies with regard to assessing the adequacy of natural gas and electricity services to
be delivered to the project site for proposed development
Hydrology/Water Quality
This proposal assumes that the project applicant will prepare a drainage report for the
proposed project to be used for both project design needs as well as the hydrology section
of the EIR CAJA will be responsible for incorporating the drainage report into the EIR
The hydrology analysis will consist of the following
Describe the existing storm water runoff from the site,
I /H Monowf Im El SiQundo i)edm Center Protect Page 13 �)
Christopher A Joseph & Associates
Public Services
December 1 2000
Describe the existing storm dram facilities (i.e , locations, capacities, and
evaluation of potential deficiencies) in the project area and any future master plan
drainage facility improvements in the project area This will include consultation
with the City Department of Public Works,
Review of any hydrology studies previously prepared for the project site;
Quantify post - project storm water runoff volumes from the project site based on
the design level ei ent and assess the impact to downstream storm drains in terms
of available capacity.
Evaluate potential pollution of downstream facilities and receiving waters due to
storm water runoff from the project site (during construction and operation of
project) and recommend appropriate mitigation measures/best management
practices consistent with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) requirements and County SUSMP program,
Recommend feasible mitigation measures if necessary to reduce hydrology /storm
drainage impacts to less than significant levels This may include coordination
with the County of Los Angeles to determine any need for constructing new
storm drain collector systems andlor reconstruction of existing systems. and
Complete the analysis of three alternatives, cumulative impacts, and residual
impacts
CAJA w ill assess the proposed project's impacts on public services CAJA will confer
with appropriate City of El Segundo personnel relative to the project's potential impact
upon sheriff and fire protection services CAJA will also analyze the potential impacts
associated with the construction of a new fire station on the project site, as well as
potential on -site locations for the proposed fire station
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Environmental Management Associates (EMA) will conduct a Phase I ESA of the project
site for the presence, or potential presence, of hazardous substance or petroleum
hydrocarbon contamination A Phase I ESA typically consists of the following activities
(1) A re%iew of all relevant records made available from interested parties,
FIH ,', upwa for F1 b, vi, ndo tfcdm Ceeier Proj,cl Page 14 103
Chresiopher A Joseph & Associates
December / :000
(2) An inspection of the site and reconnaissance of neighboring properties for
evidence of hazardous material use and potential hazardous waste contamination,
(3) A review of historical property records and available aerial photographs for
evidence of activities or past uses on the property which may have generated hazardous
w astes,
(4) Communications with relevant agencies and review of agency databases for
evidence of past hazardous materials use, contamination, or remediation on the site or
properties within one mile of the subject site,
(5) Review of mailable geohydrologic records for evidence of hazardous material
contamination, and
(6) Preparation of a written report summarizing the findings of the site assessment
and providing recommendations as appropriate
The Phase I ESA specifically does not include any soil or groundwater sampling or
analysis activities nor «ill it include a sampling survey for asbestos - containing materials
(ACM) or lead paint HoNNerer EMA will review reports earlier prepared for the
property and any additional reports provided to EMA The Phase I ESA will be
incorporated into the EIR «hick will be supplemented with an analysts of potential
hazardous materials impacts that might occur from operation of the proposed project
I P, ono,X ror Fl Seeundo Wedia Center Prgcu Page 15 104
Chrutopher A Joseph & Associates
SCHEDULE AND DELIVERABLE PRODUCTS
December 1 2000
As listed in Table 1, CAJA proposes the following schedule to prepare the El Segundo Media Center
Project EIR '
• CAJA will review all pertinent project materials and prepare the Draft Initial Study within two
weeks from authorization to proceed It is anticipated that the City will require at least one week to
review the Draft Initial Study and that one additional week would be required for CAJA to revise
the Initial Study and prepare and circulate the Notice of Preparation (NOP)
• Copies of the Adtrunistrative Draft EIR and the Technical Appendices will be submitted to the Ciry
within 8 weeks from authorization to proceed This schedule assumes that the project traffic study
will be completed approximately 4 -6 weeks after project initiation It is anticipated that the City
w ill require at least two weeks to review the Administrative Draft EIR
Upon receipt of City comments on the Administrative Draft EIR, CAJA will revise the document as
necessary within two weeks and submit the revised Administrative Draft to the City for review
Following approval by the City CAJA will publish and circulate copies of the Draft EIR and
Technical Appendices
• C MA assumes a 45-day public review and comment penod for the Draft EIR Upon completion of
the public review period and receipt of all comment letters on the Draft EIR, CAJA will prepare the
responses to comments within two weeks It is anticipated that the City will require one week to
rev iew the responses to comments
• Upon City approval of the Administrative Final EIR, CAJA will print and circulate copies of the
Final EIR which will include the Draft EIR, public comments, responses to comments, and
corrections and additions to the Draft FIR
• Based on the timeline described above and in Table 1, it is anticipated that the Final EIR could be
completed within approximately eight to nine months from authorization to proceed, subject to
coordination and additional refinement by the City as necessary
This schedule assumes I ) that the scope of the cork described in Section 11 is not substantially expanded by the City, 2) that there are
no delaNs in the delnen of critical information by the Cit) public service agencies and utilities, or the project applicant, and 3) that the
lead Cm s re,iew process can conform to the schedule described herein
FIR Proposal lot El Segundo ihdia Ceti er Pro /en
Page 16
105
- s
zov�
_ y
z - t
.. r
J
i
r
<
a
Y
r
°
Z
Y
J
• H c • y �yy ' � 5�t yy
g c c
U — U u
L '> >
o o u < c o
N
Y N U U
U U �
3 3
ry N p
Y
U
U
3
h
C
V
` T
c in
c �
c
0 � G
c '•
c �
V
�u
C
u
Y U
_T
U
3
> V
V L
T
� L
h a V
u
C G O n C d
L
T
L
h u E C U E y
U
c
`o c
U p Y
E
C°
<
U
O
O
c
U
u
9
N
N
n
H
L
Y A
O V
3 �
O-
u "
u a+
� A
E 3
u
9 `
L
v �
o u�
c n
u
a o
o �
d
v E
o=
m
c
u S
c
c
V
7 F
V e
ig
1Cl6
Christopher A Joseph & Associates
EXHIBIT B
COST PROPOSAL
December 1 2000
Table 2 provides the cost proposal for the preparation of the El Segundo Media Center Project EIR The
fees include costs for all subconsultants as well as costs for pnnting/reproduction, graphics, and other
miscellaneous direct expenses Should the scope of work or number of EIR sections increase or change, the
City understands that the consultant fee could exceed this amount Such changes include, but are not limited
to the following
Additional environmental impact categories added as a result of comments received from the
public gosemmenral agencies and or other interested parties during the scopmg and Notice of
Preparation period
Additional analysis required as a result of project modifications or delays in receiving project
materials
• Changes and/or modifications in State CEQA Guidelines or legislation for preparation of
Environmental Impact Reports
• Udinonal hours required to complete the Final EIR or attend project meetings, public hearings or
community meetings beyond that described in this proposal
• An} changes to assumptions and/or understandings contained herein regarding preparation of the
Draft and Final EIR
Such authorized additional services would be billed on a time and materials basis
11 a comparison of cost proposals of the competing consultants becomes the determining factor to your
decision- making process we ivoidd be iullutg to reiten a?td /or niodh, our price Any changes to our cost
proposal could be based on further discussion and negotiation between ourselves and the City and would
mitlude fill disclosure of cost proposals from all coisultmus competing to prepare this EIR
1 /H l i oposul for El Swqundo t led, a C enter Protect
Page 19
107
Christopher A Joseph & Associates
TABLE2
El Segundo Media Center Project
EIR Cost
December/ 1000
SCOPE OF WORK
COST
Christopher A Joseph & Associates
Initial SmdvNOP
$2,600
Draft FIR
I" Adautustratn e Draft
$20,000
Rex isions
$20,400
Final FIR
$9,200
Meenngs'Hearings (10 total)
$5,000
Crain & Associates (Paid upon acceptance bt City)'
Transportation Traffic
Task A (Scoping Meeting with Ciry of El Segundo Staff)
$1,000
Task B (Project Traffic Study)
$27,000
Task C (Meetings'Hearmgs/Presentanonsl
$9,500
G Task D (Final EIR)
$3,500
Giroux & Associates (Paid upon acceptance b} City)
$2,650
I\ it Qualm
\mse
I
tl Law Crandall (Paid upon acceptance by Gty)
$3,500
yGeolOev and Soils
Fox tronmental Management Associates (Paid upon acceptance by City)
$5,500
Phase I Em tronmental Site Assessment
DIRECT COSTS (Estimated/Will be Billed at 100% of Actual Cost)
$7,000
Pruning Graphics Postage, etc
TOTAL $116,850*
If necessary Crain & Associates will conduct new traffic counts at up to 20 study intersections for an additional S8,500 Also,
if more than 20 study intersections need to be analyzed the count collection and analysts per intersection can be performed for
S I '_(Ill per intersection
I IR Proposal for £l Se¢ando Afedia Center Project
Page 20
10F
Christopher A. Joseph & Associates
environmental planning and research
FEESCHEDULE
(Effective January 1, 2000)
HOURLY RATES
• Principal
$180 00/hour
• Project Manager
$160 00/hour
• Senior Em uonmental Planner
$140 Whour
• Emironmental Planner
S12000/hour
• Associate Em ironmental Planner
$100 00 /hour
• Assistant Em ironmental Planner
$90 00/hour
• Research Assistant
$75 00/hour
• Internet Research
$60 00/hour
• Graphics
$50 001hour
• R ord Processme
$45 Whour
DIRECT EXPENSES
Direct expenses including but not limited to those items presented below, will be billed at 100 percent of actual costs
• Purchases of project materials
• Technical subconsultants
• Reproduction printing and photographic costs
• Postage, messenger and overnight mailing
• Travel telephone Internet access and research fees and other miscellaneous costs
109
11 B49 W Olympic Boulevard Sude 101 -Los Angeles CA 90064 • Phone 310 - 473 -1600. Fox 310- 473 -9336 • e-mail cajoelr®cojaeir com
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Proposal to purchase one police canine, support equipment and all related training
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Approve purchase of new canine and all related support items on a sole- source vendor
basis
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
Officer Ray Garcia was recently promoted to the position of sergeant and his police service
dog, Dako, was retired from active police duty In order to continue the successful police
K -9 program a new police service dog is recommended Police canines have proven
effective over the years by reducing risk to officers, reducing time spent on building
searches and in the seizure of narcotics and their proceeds
It is recommended the City purchase one police canine on a sole- source vendor basis
This request for sole- source vendor is based on the following factors
• Proven reliability of canines previously purchased from Adlerhorst, International, Inc
• Adlerhorst International, Inc consistently maintains higher standards of training than
those required by California Peace Officers Standards and Training
• Adlerhorst International, Inc currently is our monthly, yearly, and specialized training
provider and this will maintain consistency in our existing training effort
• Adlerhorst International, Inc guarantees their animals unconditionally
The police service dog will be purchased using asset forfeiture account
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Letter from Adlerhorst Kennels
Memo from Sergeant Garcia
Memo from Lieutenant Tavera
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget:
Amount Requested
Account Number:
$50,000
$15,057
109 -400- 3105 -6241 A/F
Project Phase: None
Appropriation required: None
Va b
PS
iii •. Police
REVIEWED 4_.
M ry S nn, City Manager
Contingency Account
DATE:
/.Z//s /-,
i
13
12/15/00 9 15 AM
110
City of El Segundo
INTER - DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
December 13, 2000
To: Tim Gnmmond, Chief of Police (through channels)
From: Mitch Tavera, Lieutenant
Subject: Proposal for New Police Service Dog
On today's date I spoke with Rebecca Brown, United States Department of Treasury
Asset Forfeiture Division, I explained to Ms, Brown that our Department had recently
retired a police service dog (Dako) and that we wanted to purchase a new police service
dog using asset forfeiture funds Further, Dako was originally purchased with asset
forfeiture proceeds
Ms Brown said that using asset forfeiture funds to purchase a police service dog was
permissible. It was her opinion that the Department was supplementing and not
supplanting its budgetary resources
MT /sn
111
Inter - Departmental Correspondence
12 -12 -00
To: Lieutenant M Tavera. K -9 Coordinator
From: A/Sergeant R D Garcia
Subject: Price information for new K -9
In order to accurately plan for the upcoming K -9 Officer opening, I have compiled a list
of items needed for a new K -9 team along with current prices
Item
Cost
Dog (all breeds) $6,00000
Basic handler class (6 weeks) $2,400 00
6' Leather leash
$2500
3' Leather leash
$23 00
30" Retractable leash
$5000
Pinch Collar
$25 00
Muzzle
$20000
Subtotal $8,723.00
Other associated costs
*Hotel room $3,15400
Per diem ($36.00 a day) $1,08000
Concrete slab and kennel $2,1000
Subtotal $6,334.00
Vender
Adlerhorst
*Hotel room is the Residence Inn Government rate at $105 13 (tax included) per night for
5 nights a week
Grand total
$15,05700
According to Dave Reaver at Adlerhorst, the next basic class will be held on January 22nd
2001 Further, the class is not POST reimbursable and the next basic class will begin
April 9ih Dave will be leaving for Europe on January 71h, so if we would like a dog with
particular drives /qualities, we should let him know before then
Raymond Garcia
112
P.01
DEG -12 -00 01.19 PM
U
to vtir�t
R 'I, I`„ I ovtP"ENT
El Segundo Police Department
Attn Sgt Garcia
Tate a (310) 624 -2200
Fax x (310) 640 -7683
Dear Sir
?Oast \NTeRN4r'0yTO
4 ' n
���OE K -9 ACpQ�t�
December 13, 2000
Pss'z4�a1_PoJic€ S-ervice jog ansi_TrAin�na
-hank yrou for your interest in Adlerhorst We are a famiiy business owned by David & Pip Reaver
C�, 7 1,2 acre facility In West Riverside County has been providing quality Police Service Dogs and training since 1976
•o ove, 200 iaw enforcement agencies Our program has evolved to be the largest private police dog school in the world
D. rinq th s lenure we have introduced many techniques and theories that are considered stale of the art today
Instructor Vaf[
Au oL' staff have at least 10 years experience In the training of police service dogs in addition we are continually training
I. , lime police officers to instruct in our classes We believe the combination of hands on experience as working police
Pog nardiers coupled with our comprehensive training program gives us the best training staff possible our instructor
Vaif has an optimum level of both law enforcement and police service dog training experience This Includes 2u-4;1i4H1 as
wel, as technigaj experience The training director has over 35 years experience in the field, as well as a lifetime teaching
,ecenliw tfom the State of California will) a specialty in Police Science All our instructors are California State 0 O S T
of ,ato's
Importing titLed -db 3
At, are the innovators of using imported titled dogs This greatly reduces liability by showing up to two years of training
n, cr to procurement In addition we can provide a more street ready dog in 5 weeks than is possible with a 16 week
,'tie w -rh a dog with no, or minimal previous training
're procurement process In place today is second to none We are the only Importer who maintains facthties in Europe
: °.e rave a vehicle that can transport 18 dogs, plus a trailer that will accommodate 10 more Ail our nclao m9nLIItid
testing is hangs —on We do not simply call and "order" dogs from brokers We make 6 to 10 trips a year Every dog is
. =s'eo personally Our testing is done away from the dogs familiar training area ands considered by European trainers
as ire o` the most comprehensive selection processes
're iechnques and standards we introduced over the years have even caused many European agencies 10 reassess
�e , lesbng and procurement
113
al1LERHORST1NTERNATin%Ar r.,:r
CONTINUE FPOrl PREVIOUS PAGE 001
ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL, INC. 3951 Vernon Avcnue • Riverside. CA 91509 . 0-09)W-1410 • FAA (909 6- --'6P,
PEA PA0232568 PA0232520
A compreh-ensty-e-attitte__n_cu4Mc&tlQa standard ofaerformancg
Only since 1992 has P O S T developed a minimum standard for evaluating police service dog performance Prior to
trial many used vague standards, often not In printed form Some even used foreign standards verbatim Our written
standard has been in place since 1983 It has met the challenge of our courts Typically our training is stipulated to in
court to attempt to keep out of testimony a training requirement well beyond the expectations of the most biased juror
Our qualification requirements are continually reviewed and updated by our attorneys and ourselves
All training. including marnten&Dj;"1iniD.2, will be_dOsPmnted. Th-c dWarfman superViggr
will receive a &pp K.
Description_OLDQ sAad G.UarA ee
carman Shepherd between 18 d 48 months with spine and hips guaranteed for one year, or a Malinors between 18 & 48
months with spine and hips guaranteed for two years Any congenital problems other than spine or hips are guaranteed
for 12 monins at 100% Guarantee includes training with replacement dog
Each dog wiLLhatc" ml1l.tntugL0yllu1zhu0d 1 or K.N.P.V. JiOeDog / titk_QL gwYA1ont.
The dogs te`mprernment and drive level is y�aranteed suitable_fQ[Police Service with the final
derelmin_atiOn made by your apBncy�Lhe ouarantee for scJitability has Iimrlimit provided
proper trafnlDg_an_dtteallh O1 the dQg-Ls majntaMecL
ive guarantee, through our training programs to provide a level of training exceeding the requirements of the California
'ale Po ice Officers Standards and Training (P O S T ) certified entry level and re- certification programs The guarantee
;ovens any other State requirements as well Training standards are described in the enclosed Blue Book The first week
�)' me oasic class as well as the patrol and detection re•cert f cation classes, are P O S T certified
11 1
DEC-12-B0 81 .+�' FM
Price for DQO
Cost for one German Shepherd Dog - Titled $5800 -
Cost for one German Shepherd Dog suitable for detection- TRIe 56000 -
Cost for one Malmots- Titled $5800 -
Cost for one Mahnois suitable for defection- K N P V Titled $6000-
Cali fo, prices of other breeds, untitled dogs or any special requirements your agency has
We offer discounts for multiple dog purchases and pre payment!!
Prfce.for Qciectip"ft.. -Dogs.L ciudLnQ a ing
Cos: for one Narcotic Detection Dog including 4 week course
Cost for one Explosive Detection Dog including 6 week course
Cost for one Arson Detection Dog including 6 week course
Prices for _Train ios
Banc nii lei development course P 0 S T certified level IV 40 hours
Entry level handler course Including Handier Development class 200 hours
Entry level Narcotics Detection Course 160 hours
Entry level Explosive or Arson Detection Course 240 hours
°alrol yearly update class P O S T certified level III 24 hours
Detection yearly update class P O S T certified level IV 24 hours
Tracking class 40 hours
Evaluators class P 0 S T certified level IV 8 hours
lepanment instructor course 380 hours
N early maintenance program on site per team Der year
nearly maintenance program, off site Southern California only
Yearly maintenance program 9fL311e other locations
$6500 -
58000-
S80o0-
S29-
$2400-
$2500-
$3500-
$ 190-
$ so-
$350-
$ 20-
$3500-
$1000-
$1200-
Call for quote-
P-02
Seminars covering theory, practical applications and legal updates are scheduled or available on request
4' prces `or P 0 S T classes are approximate and subject to change
✓ve nave all equipment necessary for training Catalog sent by request
We thank you again for your Interest in Adlerhorst We are anxious to fill all your requirements for a successful Police
Service Dog program, if your needs are not met by this proposal, call and we will attempt to meet your special
racu rerl
S Ge ely
:David Reaver
Adlerhorst trite tional Inc
I:J
2 -9 34- a m
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
Revocable Lease Agreement between the City of El Segundo and New York Food Company to
lease a portion of City property at 630 South Douglas Street (monthly revenue of $618 50)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Approve the Revocable Lease Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement
on behalf of the City.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION'
The City owns a 1 73 acre property at 630 South Douglas Street, which was acquired by the
City to provide for the southerly extension of Douglas Street south of Alaska Avenue Portions
of this property have been leased to other businesses for parking purposes with the exception of
13,360 SF which is currently vacant
New York Foods has requested leasing 5,976 SF of the currently vacant area (adjoining the rear
of its business at 2320 Alaska Avenue) at the same monthly lease rate per square foot charged
to the currently leased areas For the New York Foods lease, the rent will be $618.50 per
month The agreement provides for the City to terminate the lease upon giving a 30 day notice
to the tenant
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS.
Revocable Lease Agreement with the map of City property to be leased
FISCAL IMPACT-
Monthly revenue of $618 50
Operating Budget:
Amount Requested.
Account Number-
Project Phase.
Appropriation Required: No
ORIGINATED BY: O
Date:
'JAN 8 2001
Andres Santamaria, Director of Public Works
REVIEWED BY I_ /, Date:
0/
14
N %COUNCIL 01UANUARYI6 06 (Fnday 1/5101 2 00 P M) 116
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
REVOCABLE LEASE AGREEMENT
THIS LEASE, made this day of
by and between the
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to
as "LESSOR "), and NEW YORK FOOD COMPANY (hereafter referred to as "LESSEE ")
WITNESSETH:
1 LESSOR does hereby lease to LESSEE and LESSEE does hereby
take from LESSOR certain premises located in the City of El Segundo, County of Los
Angeles, State of California, consisting of approximately 5,976 square feet, immediately
adjacent to Douglas Street, of a portion of Lot 22, Tract No 26557 as shown on map
recorded in Book 675, Page 97, in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Los
Angeles, State of California, described as shown on attached Exhibit "A"
2 The term of this Lease shall be from month to month, terminable by
either party upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other party At the expiration
of the term, or upon any earlier termination of this Lease, LESSEE will quit surrender the
premises herein leased, and the parties shall have no further rights or obligations as to
each other with respect to said Lease
3 For the period commencing on the lease start date and continuing
thereafter on a monthly basis until terminated, LESSEE shall pay as rent for said premises,
the sum of $618 50 in lawful money of the United States, payable in advance, on the first
n greemnt\newyorkf000 (12/27100)
117
business day of each and every month to LESSOR at 350 Main Street, El Segundo,
California 90245, unless otherwise directed in writing by LESSOR In the event this lease
commences on any day other than the first of the month, or terminates on any day other
than the last of the month, LESSEE shall pay to LESSOR a pro -rata share of the monthly
rental based upon actual days of occupancy
4 The monthly rent shall be adjusted annually, based on the Consumer
Price Index for the Los Angeles area
5 LESSEE acknowledges that it has received a copy of the conditions
enumerated in that certain deed dated January 11, 1968, by which LESSOR acquired title
to the property that is the subject of this Lease, and LESSEE agrees to comply with each
and every condition so imposed in said deed during its tenancy on the above - described
property LESSEE has conducted its own title report and due diligence and is not relying
on any representations or warrantees made by City
6 LESSEE agrees that access to the leased premises will be only from
Alaska Avenue LESSOR and LESSEE agree that the intended purpose of this Lease is
to provide additional parking for vehicles and all other uses shall be prohibited LESSEE
will be permitted to use existing driveways No new curb cuts or ramps shall be installed
by LESSEE
7 LESSEE agrees to maintain the premises in a clean and sanitary
condition LESSEE shall not place or construct any buildings and /or structures on the
premises At the termination of this lease, LESSEE shall return the premises to LESSOR
in the same or better condition as the premises were in as of the time of commencement
of this lease
n �agreemnnnewyorkfcod (12/27/00)
L
118
8 LESSEE understands that LESSOR has acquired this property
primarily for the purpose of extending Douglas Street in the City of El Segundo to cross
an existing railroad track, and LESSEE agrees that, in the event LESSOR should require
the subject property for such relocation or for any other purpose solely under the
LESSOR'S discretion, LESSEE does hereby consent to LESSOR canceling and
terminating this Lease upon thirty (30) days written notice addressed to LESSEE LESSEE
agrees to vacate the said premises within the above thirty (30) day period and remove all
LESSEE'S installations prior to the termination of the Lease. LESSEE may cancel and
terminate lease upon thirty (30) days written notice to the LESSOR
9 LESSEE shall procure and keep in effect during the term hereof a
combined single limit policy of $1,000,000 for bodily injury and property damage liability
LESSEE shall provide LESSOR with an endorsement and evidence of insurance which
provides for LESSOR, its officers, agents, and employees to be additional insured but only
in respect to the Leased Premises and which provides LESSOR with (30) days' notice of
any material change or cancellation of said insurance coverage, by registered mail
10 LESSEE shall not have the right to sublet or assign the whole or any
part of said premises, provided, however, that LESSEE may do so with the written consent
of LESSOR Any such subletting or assignment shall not relieve LESSEE of any liability
or obligation under this Lease
11 Any notice from LESSOR to LESSEE shall be deemed duly served if
mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to LESSEE at
n agreemnt\newyorkfood (1227/00) 3
119
New York Food Company
2320 Alaska Avenue
El Segundo, CA 90245
Phone: 310 -643 -6151
Fax: 310 -643 -0325
Any notice from LESSEE to LESSOR shall be deemed duly served if mailed by certified
mail, return receipt requested, addressed to LESSOR at the address set forth in
Paragraph 3 hereof In each case, the customary certified mad return receipt shall be
conclusive evidence of such service Either party may change its address to which a
notice shall be sent by giving written notice of such change to the other party as provided
herein
12 LESSEE recognizes and understands that this Lease may create a
possessory interest subject to property taxation and that the LESSEE may be subject to
the payment of property taxes levied upon such interest,
13 The terms of this Lease shall be binding upon and for the benefit of
the parties hereto, their respective successors, representatives and assigns
14 This lease represents the final agreement of the parties with respect
to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior written and oral agreements and
understandings of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof
15 In the event that any litigation is commenced respecting the
enforcement or interpretation of this LESSEE, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its
reasonable attorney's fees and costs
n agreemnlmewyorkfood (12127/DO) 4
120
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Instrument has been duly executed as of the
day and year first above written
LESSOR CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA
Mike Gordon, Mayor
City of El Segundo
LESSEE
go
Jim Wharton, New York Food Company
ATTEST
Cindy Mortesen
City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPR VED AS TO FORM
ark D Hens y
City Attorney
n agreemn[ \newy0rkf00d (12127/00) 5
121
She City of El Segundo
City Hall, 350 Bain Street
El Segundo, California 90245
Attention: City I.lanager GRANT DEED
UTAH CONSTRUCTION k MINING CO.
f. 1'T" i•u"n CE L TRUST N. L
hEf3 1 I%B AT B AZ C
CD
RAY E Lfl; County Record, O
-o
D TS 0.:- 7 t, 1
CTS
FREE � S
a Delaware corporation,
Grantor, hereby grants to TIDE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a Municipal
corporation, Grantee, the surface and that portion of the subsurface
which lies above a plane 450 feet below the mean low water level of
the Pacific Ocean (as said mean low water level is established by
U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey bench marks along the shoreline)
of the following described property situate in the City of
El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, to wit:
533 00
I
•....net
$4 40
e,,rwnts
co�rn8 1
$5 50
tot U
♦wGEIfS ,
couW
L
1353
Lot 22 of Tract No. 26557, in the city of E1 Segundo,
County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map
recorded in Book 675, pages 95 to 98 inclusive of Maps,
in the office of the County Recorder of said county.
Said tract being a subdivision of the surface and
that portion of the subsurface which lies above a
plane 450 feet below the mean low water level is
established by U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey bench
marks along the shoreline.
ALSO EXCEPTING all oil, gas, asphaltum, and other
hydrocarbons -and other minerals, whether similar to
those herein specified or not, within or that may
be produced from said land; provided, however, that
the surface of said land shall never be used for
the exploration, development, extraction, removal
or storage of said oil, gas, asphaltum, and other
hydrocarbons and other minerals, and further provided
that no installation constructed thereon shall be
disturbed in any manner in extracting said reserved
minerals, as reserved in the deed from Standard Oil
Company of California, recorded December 20, 1960,
as Instrument No. 1622, in Book D -1069, Page 898,
Official Records.
This Deed is made and accepted upon the covenants, con-
C
q
11
\i
p�
V `
ditions and restrictions contained in the Declaration of Restrictions
executed by Utah Construction k Mining Co., a Delaware corporation,
dated August 29, 1961, and recorded September 6, 1961, in Book 6t -845
of Official Records of Los Angeles County at page 678, all of which �
are incorporated herein by reference to said declaration with the
effect as though fully set forth herein, and said covenants, con-
SPLCIAL A0 E;ICY - 110 TAX STAT i1Li1TS �I
FE a .9 1908 i�
199
`
$11000
$55.0'
iNOEANci ,
IEi
� CO` T
, COURn
533 00
I
•....net
$4 40
e,,rwnts
co�rn8 1
$5 50
tot U
♦wGEIfS ,
couW
L
1353
Lot 22 of Tract No. 26557, in the city of E1 Segundo,
County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map
recorded in Book 675, pages 95 to 98 inclusive of Maps,
in the office of the County Recorder of said county.
Said tract being a subdivision of the surface and
that portion of the subsurface which lies above a
plane 450 feet below the mean low water level is
established by U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey bench
marks along the shoreline.
ALSO EXCEPTING all oil, gas, asphaltum, and other
hydrocarbons -and other minerals, whether similar to
those herein specified or not, within or that may
be produced from said land; provided, however, that
the surface of said land shall never be used for
the exploration, development, extraction, removal
or storage of said oil, gas, asphaltum, and other
hydrocarbons and other minerals, and further provided
that no installation constructed thereon shall be
disturbed in any manner in extracting said reserved
minerals, as reserved in the deed from Standard Oil
Company of California, recorded December 20, 1960,
as Instrument No. 1622, in Book D -1069, Page 898,
Official Records.
This Deed is made and accepted upon the covenants, con-
C
q
11
\i
p�
V `
ditions and restrictions contained in the Declaration of Restrictions
executed by Utah Construction k Mining Co., a Delaware corporation,
dated August 29, 1961, and recorded September 6, 1961, in Book 6t -845
of Official Records of Los Angeles County at page 678, all of which �
are incorporated herein by reference to said declaration with the
effect as though fully set forth herein, and said covenants, con-
SPLCIAL A0 E;ICY - 110 TAX STAT i1Li1TS �I
FE a .9 1908 i�
199
BK03901 PC, 769-
ditions and restrictions shall run with the land and be binding on
Grantee, its successors and assigns.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this Deed
' this / /,& day of January, 1968,
Att
UTAH CONSTRUCTION & MINING CO,
vice
STATE or CALIFORNIA
/ t 1_Couwtr of 1
Ia . be /on era
8tory.- otr>osa^,Q appeared � At*
�keaon to w
to W Ihs Y� =p[x +dent n•d tkr_ = t_.3[��stnry o! th. sorpomtlon that executed
tAI unthln Inatnw[nt, and silo knmow le n[a to be the pars.. %ahe tasatd it an
b[hnt/ of such toryerothon, and ackwouleda[d to Ina that Inch oe1p014t on as Icd
the mina, and /urdher ocknoml[dprd to ena that such mrporalm W
Maeed the unth's
Nllrrmewt purauan Itor n r[paoglalmw is Board of Dvee
htY commulbw esp,r �1J /L _
Natary Pubis
This is to certify that the interest in the real
property conveyed by the within deed to the city of El
Segundo, a municipal corporation in hereby accepted by order
of the City Council on January 22, , p 19 68
a
and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly
authorized officer.
Dated January 23, 1968
-2-
By Y.l �tzev�.k_
C ty Clerk•of the City of
El Segundo', California.
(SEAL)
C
N
t
e)
N
m
N r
� l'96L
a
+ / N
/ N
� O
v
A,,
P) lot
N r
b �
m
Y N
H
`J
N
log m
7a
� ,Sti'LlZ
NQ WW
Q N
S
is
m
a
a
t
I t
t
0
O I �
�I W "
z I
O I
I UJ )
I
1 � �
N
t
=,
aci
X
W
1
3 )
Q I
li!
U
cri
1 _
I
124
V
h
Q
N
�
a
0
CL
voo
;
m
m
�
=,
aci
X
W
1
3 )
Q I
li!
U
cri
1 _
I
124
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Adoption of Plans and Specification for the lining of sanitary sewer access structures at
various locations — Project PW No 00 -18 (estimated cost $60,000 00)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1 Adopt plans and specifications
2 Authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
The adopted fiscal year 2000 -2001 Capital Improvement Program includes a project to
install lining over the interior brick walls of sanitary sewer access structures The work
includes cleaning and sealing the walls from ground water infiltration and installation of
a structural polymer lining over the walls This is a preventative maintenance effort
intended to extend the life of these structures which were constructed in the mid 1920's
Staff has prepared plans and specification for lining approximately 50 structures in the
northwest residential area of the City The project is estimated to cost $60,000
including staff costs for design and construction inspection
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Area map
FISCAL IMPACT:
Capital Improvement Program Budget:
Amount Requested:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required:
ORIGINATED BY. // S
$60,000
$60,000
301 -400- 8204 -8393
Adoption of plans and specifications
No
JAN 8 2001
REVIEWED BY: Date:
hAon, Q+.o.,., r.t., &A ----- / / °p/
N \COUNCIL OIWANUARY16 10 (Fnday 1/5/01 2 00 P M) 15
199
W \
LL W I11Nno3 S3139N3 SOl AM, 3MMON1wTN JO All]
y2 00310 N.s
U ` w ♦ w r,lYlr> r, Ct
3 n l•. ^n �•' S 9
vnn .t a
Jti m IW 1).WM
O
a �
u < 1 0
i Y eY .1,Ae
^J 2 Ili \ iMll NiiY'>
a7 ' AYw SKIM
< lus 1Y vl CAW
U 15 .CIIC I
I ^
77"1 i
1111 aYrI T.I�� 11 _
Pq
QO III ^^ Ir^k
o III I IJ
O`>
� y
ON130
:,c vYVwY1
6
a� 1C 4G,1
^JI a uwuln
— J� lC IIeC)YO
as .31.21
as ev,.YVw
� � 1S r..I's
��^1S •yl•
l�� is yvel),s
z
a
u I W
u
4 �
Q
a
\A..
„ \1�1,Y
w r=.1 Is s♦
M%Iv stl
jpq
6
W
U
/ Y011rinr
1Y m
m 111
1.v .ec3.
W
m
r
N
7M •ll 1♦
S vu1))mw �
Av W. u
17 ]111>r1
i
U. .l..nO,l
C
IIE O. .....,,
^ V V N
. � n
N
•9 9 "w � „C�nn�'
N
r
2
W
J
U
N
i p
O
z
W
(Jr)
O
ui
CL
Q ,L
20
}
H
A
m
Z
�v
126
J�
1s
,nw
�� 1,
•1[Y .110,
z
a
u I W
u
4 �
Q
a
\A..
„ \1�1,Y
w r=.1 Is s♦
M%Iv stl
jpq
6
W
U
/ Y011rinr
1Y m
m 111
1.v .ec3.
W
m
r
N
7M •ll 1♦
S vu1))mw �
Av W. u
17 ]111>r1
i
U. .l..nO,l
C
IIE O. .....,,
^ V V N
. � n
N
•9 9 "w � „C�nn�'
N
r
2
W
J
U
N
i p
O
z
W
(Jr)
O
ui
CL
Q ,L
20
}
H
A
m
Z
�v
126
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
AGENDA DESCRIPTION.
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
Adoption of Ordinance No 1329 which Implements the standard urban storm water
mitigation plan of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Los
Angeles region by amending the El Segundo Municipal Code Chapter 6 28, "Standard
Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan Implementation" (no fiscal Impact)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
1 Second reading and adoption of Ordinance, by title only, and /or,
2 Other possible action /direction
ND AND DISCUSSION
On December 19, 2000, the City Council conducted the first reading of the Ordinance
and scheduled the second reading and adoption for January 16, 2001
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
City Council Ordinance No 1329
FISCAL IMPACT
Operating Budget
Amount Requested
Account Number
Project Phase
Appropriation Required No
ORIGINATED BY. ate.
vAvflwvaia.ryA
JAN 8 2001
/zoe,
PW- COUNCIL 0WANUARY1602 (Fnday 1/5/01200PM • V
127
1329
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, IMPLE-
MENTING THE STANDARD URBAN STORM WA-
TER MITIGATION PLAN OF THE CALIFORNIA
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
FOR THE LOS ANGELES REGION BY AMENDING
THE EL SEGUNDO MUNICIPAL CODE TO RE-
PEAL CHAPTER 6.28 AND ENACT NEW CHAPTER
6.28, "STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER MITI-
GATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION"
WHEREAS, The 1972 amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
(referred to as the Clean Water Act or "CWA "), 33 U S C §§ 1251 -1387, prohibit the
discharge of any Pollutant to na%rgable waters of the United States from a point source
unless the discharge is authorized by a permit issued pursuant to the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System ( "NPDES ") required by CWA § 402, 33 U S C §§ 1342, and
WHEREAS, Municipal separate storm sewer systems ( "MS4s ") which convey
urban runoff, including, but not limited to Storm Water runoff, are within the definition of
point sources under the CWA, and
N1 HEREAS, Pursuant to the C«'A, the United States Environmental Protection
-%gencv ( "US EPA ") has defined the term "Municipal separate storm sewer system" to mean
a comevance, or system of conveyances, including roads with drainage systems, municipal
streets curbs, gutters, catch basins, and storm drains owned or operated by a city, used for
collecting Storm Water, and
WHEREAS, The US EPA, under the National Urban Runoff Program ( "NURP ")
has funded and guided studies of eater quality from MS4s which drain residential,
commercial and light industrial sites, and
WHEREAS, NURP and other studies (cited at, among other places, 55 Fed Reg
47900) demonstrate the presence of Pollutants in urban runoff discharged to receiving
«aters through MS4 systems, and
WHEREAS, CWA § 402(p) requires that the City obtain a permit for Storm Water
and urban discharges through the City's MS4, and
NN HEREAS, Section 402(p) of the CWA further provides that NPDES permits shall
require controls to reduce the discharge)(3)(13) of Pollutants to the maximum extent
practicable, including management practices and such other provisions as appropriate for the
control of Pollutants, and
ORDINANCE NO 1329
STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
PAGE NO 1 1 2
WHEREAS, the US EPA, in partial implementation of § 402(p) of the federal
Clean Water Act, 33 U S C § 1344(p), has adopted final rules, known as the "Phase I and
Phase II Storm Water Regulations" at several places in Parts 9, 122, 123, and 124 of the
Code of Federal Regulations ( "CFR "), and
WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board ( "SWRCB ") has devel-
oped a plan to implement the requirements of section 402(p), § 6217 of the Coastal Zone
Act Reauthorization Amendments of 1990 ( "CZARA ") and certain parts of the California
Water Code, and
WHEREAS, in partial implementation of § 402(p) of the federal Clean Water
Act, 33 U S C § 1344(p), the Phase I Storm Water Regulations, the requirements of sec-
tion 402(p), § 6217 of the Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments of 1990 and
the California Water Code, the California Regional Regional Water Quality Control
Board — Los Angeles ("RWQCB -LA ") issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System ( "NPDES ") permit and V. aste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Storm
Water and Urban Runoff Discharges within the County of Los Angeles, Regional Board
Order No 96 -054, NPDES No CAS614001 (the 'Permit'), on July 15, 1996 to each City
in Los Angeles County, including the City of El Segundo, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Permit, and in partial implementation of § 402(p) of
the federal Clean Water Act, 33 L S C § 1344(p), the Phase I and Phase II Storm Water
Regulations, the requirements of section 402(p), § 6217 of the Coastal Zone Act
Reauthorization Amendments of 1990 and the California Water Code, the RWQCB -LA
Board adopted Resolution No R- 00 -02, approving and directing the Executive Officer of
the R%VQCB -LA to issue a Standard urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan for Municipal
Storm Water And Urban Runoff Management Programs in Los Angeles County
( "SUSMP ") setting forth the requirements to be implemented by all jurisdictions dis-
charging storm A ater under the Permit, and
WHEREAS, on March 8, 2000, the Executive Officer of the RWQCB -LA issued
a Final Approved STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN FOR
LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND CITIES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY (the
"SUSMP ") setting forth the requirements to be implemented by all jurisdictions dis-
charging storm water under the Permit and
WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board, in Order WQ 2000 -11,
modified the SUSMP by revising the definition of "Redevelopment," excluding Retaii
Gasoline Outlets from certain design standards, deleting the applicability of the SUSMP
to "Environmentally Sensitive Areas," limiting the applicability of the SUSMPs to dis-
cretionary development and redevelopment in specified categories, limiting the applica-
bility of the SUSMP to Redevelopment projects only if they result in creation or addition
of 5,000 square feet of impervious surfaces, deleting the requirement for funding by proj-
ect proponents who receive waivers, and extended the effective date deadline to February
15, 2001, and
ORDINANCE NO 1329 ,
STORM %k ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
PAGE NO 2
WHEREAS, this City is a permittee under the Permit and therefore is required by
federal and state law to implement all requirements of the Permit, including the SUSMP,
and
WHEREAS, this City has authority under Article 11, section 7 of the California
Constitution to adopt ordinances needed to implement these requirements, and
WHEREAS, this City also has authority under the California Water Code to
adopt and enforce ordinances conditioning, restricting, and limiting activities that might
degrade the quality of the waters of the State of California,
NOR, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SE-
GUNDO HEREBY ORDAINS THAT
SECTION 1. The El Segundo City Council hereby finds, determines and declares as
follows
Title 6 of the El Segundo Municipal Code is amended to add new Chapter 6 28,
"STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTA-
TION " to take effect on Februarn 15. 2001 and to read in its entirety as follows
- CHAPTER 6.28
STANDARD URBAN STORM NN aTER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTA-
TION
Sections:
6 28 010
LIMITS OF CHAPTER
6 28 020
SCOPE OF CHAPTER
6 28 030
DEFINITIONS
6 2S 040
RATE OF DISCHARGE
6-18050
SUBDIVISION DESIGN
o 2S 060
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
6 2S 070
CONTROL OF EROSION OF SLOPES AND CHANNELS
6 28 080
SIGNAGE OF STORM DRAINS
6 2S 090
OUTDOOR STORAGE OF MATERIALS
628 100
OUTDOOR TRASH STORAGE AREAS
628 110
MAINTENANCE OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
628 120
DESIGN STANDARDS FOR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
628 130
LOADING DOCKS
628 140
REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE BAYS
628 150
WASH AREAS
628 160
RESTAURANTS
628 170
RETAIL GASOLINE OUTLETS
6 28 180
PARKING LOTS
6 28 190
VIOLATIONS
62S 200
INSPECTION'S
1329
ORDINANCE NO _
WORM IA ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
PAGE NO 3 130
6 28 210 FEES
6 28 220 WAIVER
§ 6.28.010. Limits of Chapter
Nothing in this Chapter shall be interpreted to
(a) infringe any right or power guaranteed by the Caltforma Constitution, in-
cluding any vested property right, or
(b) require any action inconsistent with any applicable and lawfully adopted
General Plan, Specific Plan, Plan Amendment, or Building Code that con-
forms to the laws of California and the requirements of this Chapter, or
(c) restrict othem ise law ful land use except as authorized by the laws of Cali-
fornia, subject to the limitations of this Chapter
§ 6.28 020. Scope of Chapter
This Chapter shall take effect on February 15, 2001 and shall apply only to approval of
discretionary (within the meaning of the Cahforma Environmental Quality Act, Public
Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq ) )yew Development or Redevelopment projects in the
following categories (as those terms are defined in this Chapter)
(a) single-family residences on graded Hillside sites,
(b) 100,000 square foot Commercial Developments,
(c) Automotive Repair Shops (SIC codes 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532 -7534, 7536-
7539),
(d) Retail Gasoline Outlets,
(e) Restaurants (SIC code 5812),
(f) Home subdi%isions of ten or more dwelling units,
(g) Parking Lots 5,000 square feet or more or with 25 or more parking spaces
and potentially exposed to storm water runoff, as defined in this Chapter
§ 6.28.030. Definitions
For the purposes of this Chapter the following words and phrases shall have the
meanings respectively ascribed to them by this Chapter unless clearly mapplicable. Words
and phrases not ascribed a meaning by the "STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER
MITIGATION PLAN FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND CITIES IN LOS ANGELES
COUNTY" approved by the Executive Officer of the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board for the Los Angeles Region, on March 8, 2000, as modified by the State
ORDINANCE NO 1329
STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
P \GE NO 4
Water Resources Control Board in Order WQ 2000 -11, if defined therein, and if not, by the
regulations implementing the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, Clean Wa-
ter Act § 402, and Division 7 of the Cahfomta Water Code, as they may be amended from
time to tune, if defined therein, and if not, to the def rutions in an applicable permit issued
by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Los Angeles, as such pernuts may
be amended from time to time
11100,000 square foot Commercial Development" means "any Commercial De-
xelopment that creates at least 100,000 square feet of impermeable area, including, but
not limited to parking areas (See "Commercial Development' as defined below )
"Automotive Repair Shop" means a facility that is categorized in any one of the
following Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532 -7534 or
7536 -7539
"Best Management Practice' ( "BMP ") means "any schedule of activities, pro-
hibition of practices, maintenance procedure, program, technology, process, siting cnte-
na, operational methods of measures, or other management practices or engineered sys-
tems, which when implemented prevent, control, remove, or reduce pollution
"Commercial Development" means any development on private land that is not
residential or a site of an industnal activity, as defined in 40 C F.R § 122 26(b)(14)
Commercial Development" includes but is not limited to, hospitals, laboratories and
other medical facilities, educational institutions, recreational facilities, plant nurseries,
multi- apartment buildings car wash facilities, mini -malls and other business complexes,
shopping malls, hotels, office buildings public warehouses and other light industrial
complexes not w ithm the scope of 40 C F R § 122 26(b)(14)
" Directh Connected Impervious Area" ( "DCIA ") means a land area made im-
permeable to water from which runoff may enter a storm drainage system without first
flow tng across a permeable land area
"Greater Than Nine Vnit Home Subdivision" means any subdivision where at
least ten (10) single -famih or multi - family dwelling units are to be developed
"Hillside" means a parcel in an area with known erosive soil conditions, where
the development will require grading on any natural slope which is twenty-five per cent
(25 %) or greater
"New Development" means the subdivision of land, or the construction of
structures or other impen ious surfaces, or both
"Parking Lot" means an area or facility for the temporary parking or storage of
motor vehicles used personally or for business or commerce, which contains 5,000 square
feet or more, or twenty -five (25) or more parking spaces, and which is potentially ex-
posed to stone water
1329
ORDINANCE NO
STORM N ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
PAGE NO 5
"Redevelopment" means, on an already developed site, the creation or addition
of at least 5,000 square feet of impervious surfaces Redevelopment includes, but is not
limited to the expansion of a building footprint or addition or replacement of a structure,
structural development including an increase in gross floor area and/or exterior construc-
tion or remodeling; replacement of impervious surface that is not part of a routine main-
tenance activity, and land disturbing activities related with structural or impervious sur-
faces Where redevelopment results in an increase of less than fifty percent (50 %) of the
impervious surfaces of a previously existing development, and the existing development
was not subject to these SUSMPs the Design Standards apply only to the addition, and
not to the entire development
"Restaurant" means a stand -alone facility where prepared food and drinks are
sold for consumption, including stationary lunch counters and refreshments stands selling
prepared food and drinks for immediate consumption (See SIC Code 5812) "Restau-
rant" does not include co- located stalls or food counters in general purpose establish-
ments such as markets and grocer} stores
"Retail Gasoline Outlet" means anv facility where gasoline and lubricating oils
are sold
"Source Control BMP" means any schedules of activities, prohibitions of prac-
tices, maintenance procedures managerial practices or operational practices that aim to
prex ent storm A ater pollution by reducing the potential for contamination at the source of
pollution
"Storm Event" means a rainfall event that produces more than 0 1 inch of pre-
cipitation separated from the prey sous storm event by at least 72 hours of dry weather
"Structural Control BMP" means any structural facility designed and con-
structed to mitigate the adverse impacts of urban runoff pollution (e g., a canopy, struc-
tural enclosure) This category may include both Treatment Control BMPs and Source
Control BMPs
"Treatment" means the use of physical, chemical, or biological processes to re-
mo%e pollutants Such processes include, but are not limited to filtration, gravity settling,
media absorption, biodegradation, biological uptake, chemical oxidation and UV radia-
tion
"Treatment Control BMP" means any engineered system designed to remove
pollutants by simple gravity setting of particulate pollutants, filtration, biological uptake,
media adsorption or any other physical, biological, or chemical process
1329
ORDINANCE
STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 133
PAGE NO 6
§ 6.28.040. Rate of Discharge
No New Development shall increase the peak rate of discharge of storm water from the
developed site if this increase would make downstream erosion more probable
§ 6.28 050. Subdivision Design
Unless inconsistent with vested nghts, the site design for all subdivisions subject to this
Chapter to the maximum extent practicable, shall
(a) Concentrate or cluster New Development on portions of the site while
lea%me the remamin2 land in a natural undisturbed condition,
(b) Limit clearing and grading of native vegetation to the minimum extent
practicable, consistent with the construction of lots, and to allow access
and pro\ide fire protection,
(c) preserve riparian areas and wetlands
§ 6.28.060. Best Management Practices (BMP)
(a) On the date this Chapter takes effect, those Best Management Practices
which are listed In Tables I and 2 of the "STANDARD URBAN STORM
"ATER MITIGATION PLANT FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND
CITIES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY" approved by the Executive Offi-
cer of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Los
Angeles Region, on March S. 2000, as modified by the State Water Re-
sources control Board in Order WQ 2000 -11, shall be deemed to be incor-
porated by reference and adopted by this City and shall remain in effect
until the City Council shall adopt by resolution a guidebook prepared or
recommended by the Director of Public Works (the "Director "), catego-
nzing development and Best Management Practices for each category
(b) The Director may from time to time revise the guidebook, and the City
Council may adopt these rep Isions by resolution
(c) No Best Management Practice other than a Structural or Treatment Con-
trol Best Management Practice shall be used in any development regulated
under this Chapter, unless the guidebook recommends that practice
(d) No Structural or Treatment Control Best Management Practice may be
used in any development regulated under this Chapter unless the guide-
book recommends that practice
ORDINANCE NO 1329
STORM W ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 13 4
PAGE NO 7
§ 6.28.070. Control of Erosion of Slopes and Channels
Best Management Practices used on slopes or channels in New Development or Redevel-
opment subject to this Chapter shall
(a) convey runoff from tops of slopes,
(b) eliminate or reduce flow to natural drainage systems, and for flows which
cannot be eliminated, utilize natural drainage systems, rather than artificial
drainage systems to the maximum extent practicable,
(c) stabilize soil at permanent channel crossings,
(d) vegetate slopes with native or drought tolerant species known to control
erosion. and
(e) dissipate concentrated Flows before they enter unlined channels
§ 6 28.080 Signage of Storm Drains
In the project area of New Development or Redevelopment subject to this Chapter, a no-
tice that dumping in storm drains and catch basins is illegal shall be
(a) stenciled in paint or other permanent means at all storm drain inlets and
catch basins within the project area,
(b) posted at all known public accesses to natural or artificial drainage chan-
nels within the project area, and
(c) maintained to preserve the sign
§ 6.28.090. Outdoor Storage of Materials
(a) All materials stored outdoors in New Development or Redevelopment
subject to this Chapter which, if exposed to storm water, may reasonably
be expected to add pollutants to it, shall be thoroughly isolated from con-
tact
(1) with storm water, by enclosure in a structure, or
(2) with storm water, by a surrounding curb or other containment
structure
ORDINANCE NO 1329
STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
PAGE NO 8 �3 5
(b) The storage area must be completely covered.
(1) by impermeable paving and
(2) any structure by an overhead covering that adequately diverts pre-
cipitation away from the ground between the material and the sur-
rounding containment structure
§ 6.28.100. Outdoor Trash Storage Areas
Except where they serve only single - family residences, solid waste containers in New
Development or Redevelopment subject to this Chapter shall be stored in areas that
(a) are isolated from contact with storm water originating outside the storage
area and
(b) are surrounded with a barrier sufficient to prevent all trash from being
transported out of the storage area, except during collection
§ 6 28.110 Maintenance of Best Management Practices
(a) Every person applying to the City for discretionary approval of any New
Development or Redevelopment subject to this Chapter, as part of that ap-
plication, in a signed Anting, shall agree to maintain any Structural or
Treatment Control Best Management Practice to be implemented in that
development through means such as a covenant running with the land
(such as covenants, conditions and restriction, commonly known as
CC &Rs), CEQA mitigation measures, Conditional Use Permit or other le-
gal agreement (collectively "Agreement ")
(b) The Agreement described in subsection (a) of this section shall remain to
force until ownership of the developed property has been entirely trans-
ferred, and upon transfer, shall be binding on the new owners)
§ 6.28 120. Design Standards for Best Management Practices
Except as this Chapter may specifically exempt, every Structural or Treatment Control
Best Management Practice implemented pursuant to this Chapter in New Development or
Redevelopment subject to this Chapter, for the area contributing to that practice.
(a) shall be adequate to protect from flooding those parts of the contributing
area adjacent to drainage channels, according to design criteria the (City
Public Works or Engineering Agency) may establish,
1329
ORDINANCE NO
STORM W ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
PAGE NO 9
136
(b) shall be adequate
(1) for the volume of storm water that, as determined by the formula
recommended in "ASCE Manual of Practice No 87 (1998)," may
be collected from the contributing area during a 24 -hour period in
which the total storm water runoff exceeds 85% of all runoff vol-
umes that have been measured for 24 -hour periods for that same
area, or
(2) to treat, b,, the method recommended in "Califorma Storm Water
Best Management Practices Handbook— Industnal/Commercial
(1993)," and as determined there, 80% or more volume treatment
of the annual volume of storm water runoff from the contributing
area or
(3) for the volume of storm water runoff from the contributing area
produced by a storm event of 0 75 inches
(c) Subsection (b) of this section shall not apply to any land area of less than
5.000 square feet being developed or redeveloped for use by any Restau-
rant, or any Retail Gasoline Outlet
(d) Where redevelopment results in an increase of less than fifty percent (50 %)
of the imperious surfaces of a previously existing development, and the
existing development was not subject to these SUSMPs, the Design Stan-
dards apply only to the addition, and not to the entire development
§ 6.28.130. Loading Docks
In any 100,000 square foot Commercial Development or in any Automotive Repair Shop,
the design of any outdoor loading dock area in New Development or Redevelopment
subject to this Chapter shall
(a) use an overhead covering that prevents the entry of storm water or
(b) prevent the entry of storm u ater by diverting it away and
(c) not conduct storm water from any truck well directly into a storm drain
system
§ 6.28.140. Repair and Maintenance Bays
In any 100,000 square foot Commercial Development or in any Automotive Repair Shop,
in New Deg elopment or Redevelopment subject to this Chapter the design of any repair
or maintenance bay shall
ORDINANCE NO 1329
STORM \t ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
PAGE NO 10 13 '7
(a) prevent the entry of storm water by diverting it away or by locating such
bays indoors and
(b) use a drainage system that collects all water from washing and from leaks
or spills and stores it in a sump for disposal and
(c) does not conduct storm water from the bay directly to a storm drain sys-
tem
§ 6.28.150. R ash Areas
The design of any wash area for motor vehicles or equipment in New Development or
Redevelopment subject to this Chapter shall use
(a) an adequate overhead covering and
(b) a device that clan fies or otherwise pretreats all wash water and
(c) a drain conducting all treated wash water to a sanitary sewer
§ 6.28.160. Restaurants
The design of anv Restaurant subject to this Chapter shall include an area for the washing
or cleaning of equipment, which
(a) if indoors. shall
(1) be self - contained
(2) use a grease trap and
(3) use a drain conducting all waste water to a sanitary sewer, and
(b) if outdoors, shall
(1) use an overhead covering adequate to prevent contact with storm
water,
(2) be covered with impermeable paving,
(3) be surrounded by a curb or other containment, and
(4) use a drain conducting all waste water to a sanitary sewer
ORDINANCE NO 1329
STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
PAGE NO 11 }
§ 6.28.170. Retail Gasoline Outlets
All fuel dispensing areas in any Retail Gasoline Outlet subject to this Chapter shall
(a) be covered by a structure that
(1) extends outw and at least as far as the grade break at all points and
(2) diverts all storm water away from the fueling area
(b) be paved with a material, other than asphaltic concrete, that is imperme-
able to water and has a smooth surface with a slope of not less than two
Per cent (2 %) but not more than four per cent (4 %),
(c) be separated from the rest of the site by a grade break that, to the maxi-
mum extent practical, prevents storm water from entering the fueling area,
(d) extend outward at least six and one -half feet (6 5') from the outermost
comer of any fuel dispenser. or a distance one foot (1') greater than the
combined length of the dispensing hose and nozzle, whichever distance is
less,
§ 6.28.180. Parking Lots
To the maximum extent practical, all Parkins Lots subject to this chapter shall minimize
offsite transport of pollutants by using the following design criteria and BMPs
(a) minimizing impen sous land coverage,
(b) providing for effective treatment or infiltration of storm water before it is
discharged into storm drains, and
(c) Use of operational and maintenance measures to remove heavy metals, oil
and grease and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
§ 6.28.190. Violations
(a) Violation of any provision of this Chapter shall be both a misdemeanor
and a public nuisance
(b) The remedies specified in this Chapter shall not exclude any other legal
remedy that may be available to the City
§ 6.28.200. Inspections
(a) The Director of Public Works and such officers as the Director may desig-
nate shall enforce the provisions of this Chapter
ORDINANCE NO 1329
STORM "ATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
PAGE NO 12
i3t.)
(b) As necessary, these officers may, at a reasonable time and in a manner
authorized by the laws of California, enter and make inspections on any
property regulated under this Chapter
§ 6.28.210. Fees
The City Council may establish and fix the amount of fees for services provided un-
der this Chapter, as authorized under sections 66016 and 66018 of the California
Government Code
§ 6.28.220. Wager
(a) Any person required under this Chapter to implement a Structural or
Treatment Control Best Management Practice may petition to the City
Council to wane that requirement as impractical, provided the petitioner
has in good faith considered and rejected as not feasible all such practices
available
(b) The City Council ma% waive a Structural or Treatment Control Best Man-
agement Practice as impractical if
(1) inadequate space for treatment exists on a redevelopment project
or
(2) soil conditions strongly disfavor the use of infiltration or
(3) the natural land surface where the BMP would be located lies
(A) above a known unconfined aquifer or
(B) less than ten (10) feet above an existing or potential source
of drink-in- water
Ic) Any petition for waiver not falling within the foregoing categories shall be
forwarded to the Regional Board for consideration
SECTION 2. Severabthty If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause,
phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitu-
tional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not af-
fect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance The City Council hereby
declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivi-
sion, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or
more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof
be declared invalid or unconstitutional
ORDINANCE NO 1329
STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
PAGE NO 13 140
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be published as required by law
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 2000
MIKE GORDON, MAYOR
ATTEST
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby
certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the
foregoing Ordinance No 1329_ was duly introduced by said City Council at a regular
meeting held on the 19th day of December 2000 , and was duly passed and
adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the
City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of
and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
ABSTAIN
NOT PARTICIPATING
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
�'Z-
,,�WrkD Hens i y ttorn
ORDINANCE NO _1329
STORM DATER MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTAT-10TF'
PAGE NO 14 1 ,t 1
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION
Award of annual concrete contract to C J Construction, Inc for P C C Curb, Curb &
Gutter, sidewalk and other minor Improvements Public Works Project #PW 00 -14, total
contract amount $50,000
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
1 Award contract to the lowest bidder, C J Construction, Inc (See attached Bid
Sheet)
2 Authorize the Mayor to sign the standard Public Works construction agreement after
approval as to form by the City Attorney
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
On November 8, 2000, the City Council adopted the plans and specifications for the
citywide annual concrete contract and to authorize staff to advertise the project for
receipt of construction bids
Staff solicited bids with estimated quantities for eight (8) items In all categories this
contractor was low bidder
Staff has verified the low bidder references and received favorable responses This
contractor was awarded last year's contract and performed adequately Staff
recommends award of contract to the lowest responsible bidder, C.J Construction, Inc
up to, and not to exceed $50,000
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Bid summary sheet
1►u19TTIi➢
Operating Budget $100,000
Amount Requested. $ 50,000
Account Number, 106 -400- 8203 -8357
Project Phase. Award Contract
Appropriation Required* NO
ORIGINATED BY Date
Andres Santamaria, Director of Public Works JAN 8 2Q��
REVIEWED BY. Date
Mary Strenn, Ity nager
N \COUNCIL 01 WANUARY16 01 (Monday 1/8/01 1 00 P M)
142
BID SUMMARY SHEET
C J Construction, Inc $54,570
Civil Works Corporation $59,095
3 W A Ras(c Construction Company $64,300
4 Ranco Corporation $66,700
N \COUNCIL 0lUANUARY16 01 (Monday V6101 1 OOP M I
143
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION*
Recommendation for approval of the 2000/2001 proposed vehicle and equipment
purchases in the amount of $206,41000 Funds approved and available In the
2000/2001 Equipment Replacement Fund
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
Authorize the staff to solicit bids and award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder,
purchase designated equipment, and dispose of all Identified surplus vehicles and
equipment at auction
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The 2000/2001 Budget Identified 13 vehicles, 1 transit bus, 9 pieces of equipment, and
3 police motorcycles for replacement during this fiscal year As in past years, the
Equipment Maintenance Division and staff from the Police, Fire, Budding and Planning,
Parks & Recreation, and Public Works Departments have completed their evaluation of
the vehicles and equipment, as well as each Department's needs The goal was to
optimize the usage of the existing fleet, taking Into account the need for the vehicle, Its
(continued on next page.. . )
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Equipment Schedule
W119ASAA
Operating Budget Equipment Replacement Fund
Amount Requested $206,41000
Account Number 601 -400- 0000 -8105
Project Phase Annual
Appropriation Required. NO
ORIGINATED BY p Date
aAA-� JAN 4 2001
Andres Santamana, Director of Public Works
RFVirwrn RV n -. -.
1
Mary enn, City Manager
N 1COUNCIL OIWANUARY16 03 (Tuesday 1/9/01 2 00 P M ) 18
144
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION (continued):
age, mileage, and repair record Only after determining that the existing vehicles and/or
equipment could no longer meet the needs of the department did staff recommend the
replacement of these units This evaluation resulted in the re- assignment of 2 units and
deferring the replacement of 8 vehicles, 6 pieces of equipment, and two motorcycles,
providing a good overall balance to the City's fleet
NOTE:
The City can award to any existing government contract that was competitively bid and
agreed to by the vendor receiving the award All proceeds received from auction will be
recorded into account 001 - 300 - 0000 -3901 (General Fund) or 112- 300 -3901 (Prop A"
Fund)
N \COUNCIL 01\JANUARYI6 03 (Tuesday 119101 2 00 P M)
145
EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE
146
ORIG REPLACE
UNIT
MODEL
DATE/
NUMBER
& YEAR
CURRENT MILE
RECOMMENDATION
4309
1990 Ford
1998/99
Replace this with a used in -kind unit This
Police
Taurus
67,000
unit will be transferred to the Police Traffic
division as a parking control unit, replacing
4383 which will be sold at auction Cost
$19,000
4310
1991 Ford
1999/00
Replace this sedan with a used, in -kind
Police
Taurus
65,000
unit This unit will be sold at auction Cost
$19,000
2318
1988 Pickup
1998/99
Replace this unit with a new in -kind
Water/
Truck
109,000
pickup This unit will be sold at auction
Wastewater
Cost $29,760
2662
1975 Air
2000/01
Replace this unit with a new in -kind
Streets
Compressor
1,200 hours
compressor This unit will be sold at
auction Cost $17,400
6421
1976 Brush
2000/01
Replace this unit with a new in -kind
Parks & Rec
Chipper
1,800 hours
chipper. This unit will be sold at auction
Cost $22,000
3321
1989 Jaws-
2000101
Replace this with a new in -kind unit This
Fire
of -Life
N/A
unit will be sold at auction Cost $23,400
3329
1993 Jaws-
2000/01
Replace this with a new in -kind unit This
Fire
of -Life
N/A
unit will be sold at auction Cost $23,400
2507
1987 Chev
2000/01
Replace this with a newer 1997 Police
Water
Sedan
48,000
unit This unit will be sold at auction Cost
$3,000
4083
1985
1996/98
Replace this with a new engine analyzer
Equipment
Engine
that can be upgraded for the newer fleet
Maintenance
Analyzer
Cost $26,800
3312
Additional
To purchase a used sedan for the
Fire
Sedan
Principal Prevention Specialist, approved
in the 2000/2001 Budget Cost $22,650
146
Equipment Schedule January 16, 2000
Page 2
Note All new vehicles and equipment purchased will be either low emission or an alternative fuel type,
where applicable The new fleet will meet or exceed all Air Quality Management District regulations
Other items to be auctioned at this time
Unit 1116, 1991 pool car
Unit 2106, 1977 generator
Unit 2108, 1987 generator
Unit 2300, 1986 sedan
Unit 2519, 1980 cut -off saw
Unit 2532, 1997 rammer compactor
Unit 4025, 1990 Police motorcycle
Unit 4029, 1996 Police motorcycle
Unit 4301, 1981 Police van
Unit 6538, 1992 grass edger
Unit 6581, 1996 lawnmower
Unit number and age unknown, engine valve grinding machine
IJIUKRAMMUFUTMI
1 4 1
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING- Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION
Acceptance of the lining of sanitary sewer access structures — Project No PW 00 -12
(final contract amount = $62,460 39)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
1 Accept the work as complete
2 Authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the
County Recorder's Office
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
On September 5, 2000, The City Council awarded a contract for $50,000 00 to
Transportable Treatment Services for the 1999 -2000 annual program for the lining of
sanitary sewer access structures
The work has now been satisfactorily completed The final contract amount, based on
measured quantities, is $62,460 39 Staff recommends City Council acceptance of the
work
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
1 Notice of completion
2 Area map
FISCAL IMPACT
Capital Improvement Program $60,00000
Amount Requested $62,46039
Account Number 301 -400- 8204 -8393
Protect Phase Accept the work as complete
Appropriation Required No
ORIGINATED BY a Date
AN R Inm
N \COUNCIL 01WANUARY16 -09 (Monday 1/9/01 1 00 P M)
19
148
Recording Requested by
and When Recorded Mail To:
City Clerk, City Hall
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
Project Name Lining of Sanitary Sewer Access Structures
Protect No PW 00 -12
Notice is hereby given pursuant to State of California Civil Code Section 3093 at seq that
1 The undersigned is an officer of the owner of the interest stated below in the property
hereinafter described
2 The full name of the owner is City of El Segundo
3 The full address of the owner is City Hall, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA, 90245
4 The nature of the interest of the owner is Public street right -of -way
5 A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was field reviewed by the
City Engineer on December 8, 2000 The work done was
Lining of sanitary sewer access structures
6 On January 16, 2001, the City Council of the City of El Segundo accepted the work of this
contract as being complete and directed the recording of this Notice of Completion in the
Office of the County Recorder
7 The name of the Contractor for such work of improvement was
Transportable treatment services
8 The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of El
Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows
Various streets
9 The street address of said property is Not applicable (various streets)
Dated
Bellur K Devaraj
City Engineer
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, say I am the City Engineer of the City El Segundo, the declarant of
the foregoing Notice of Completion, I have read said Notice of Completion and know the
contents thereof, the same is true of my own knowledge
I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct
Executed on
2001, at El Segundo, California
Bellur K Devarat
City Engineer
H NOTZESPW00 -12NOC 14
n
'..tj
W-
oL e
f a
v Q
� s
J
eV ■
3
W s
I�
w
W
J
IL
w
D
Y�W4 J
Q D
af•ofwsew ro ufo
*safe fee
r
I
. L
..ate
i
u w.
z
U Um,, ,w
a. Lm.
_I
I
uMflos
slVswr
s01
fy
�
u
Y
n
'..tj
W-
oL e
f a
v Q
� s
J
eV ■
3
W s
I�
w
W
J
IL
w
D
Y�W4 J
Q D
af•ofwsew ro ufo
*safe fee
r
I
. L
..ate
1. i I
a.a w e`Cs
u w.
z
U Um,, ,w
a. Lm.
Y
fy
�
u
Y
f
•
1211
f O
NOR
1. i I
a.a w e`Cs
O
D
z
co
W
LL. H
O J
W
a
a U.
s o
r
H
u,
s
V
J
150
u w.
z
U Um,, ,w
a. Lm.
O
D
z
co
W
LL. H
O J
W
a
a U.
s o
r
H
u,
s
V
J
150
z
I
Y
fy
�
u
Y
O
D
z
co
W
LL. H
O J
W
a
a U.
s o
r
H
u,
s
V
J
150
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
AGENDA DESCRIPTION
MEETING DATE- January 16, 2001
AGENDA HEADING Consent Agenda
Application to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (MTA)
2001 Call for Projects
ENDED COUNCIL ACTION
Authorize staff to submit an application for the conversion of the Nash Street - Douglas
Street one -way street system to a two -way street system (estimated cost $1 65 million)
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
(Background and Discussion begins on the next page.........)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
FISCAL IMPACT Potential City matching expenditure of $577,500
if MTA approves the grant application
Operating Budget
Amount Requested
Account Number
Protect Phase
Appropriation Required None at this time
ORIGINATED BY Date
JAN 10 2001
Andres Santamaria. Director of Public Works
REVIEWED BY n. l 'It„ Date
/,
I
b /1.1
N =UNCIL01 WANUARY 1605(Tuesday 1 /9/01200 PM) O
151
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The MTA has solicited project requests from local agencies for its 2001 Call for Projects
seeking MTA grant funds The last date for submitting applications is February 2, 2001
Nash Street — Douglas Street One -Way to Two -Way Street Conversion
Nash and Douglas Streets, between El Segundo Boulevard and Imperial Highway, are
currently one -way streets This project proposes the conversion of the current one -way
system to a two -way system to improve the access to businesses and private properties
fronting the two (2) streets
The scope of work Includes modifications and upgrades to all twelve (12) traffic signals,
new signals, re- striping and re- signing the streets, and construction of the landscaped
raised median Islands on Douglas Street where feasible
Application Modal Category
Estimated project cost
Regional Surface Transportation
Improvements
$1 65 million
Minimum Local Agency match requirement 35% = $577,500
Comment
The City's matching amount may be funded through a combination of gas tax revenues,
traffic mitigation fees and Proposition "C" local return revenues
N ICOUNCILOI JANUARYIB CS a T wey Imol 2 oo P M ) , 5 2
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING- Consent Calendar
AGENDA DESCRIPTION.
Examination plans for the Personnel Merit System job classification of Senior Planner
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION.
Approve the Examination Plans
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Chapter 2 28 080 of the El Segundo Municipal Code, entitled "Administration and Personnel', provides that
the Personnel Officer shall review and recommend to the City Manager, who in turn shall recommend to the
City Council, an appropriate examination plan and weights for each portion of the examination for Personnel
Merit System job classifications
DISCUSSION
-REFER TO ATTACHMENT -
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
FISCAL IMPACT
(Check one) Operating Budget Capital Improv. Budget,
Amount Requested
Project/AccountBudget
ProjecUAccount Balance Date
Account Number
Project Phase
Appropriation Required - Yes_, No
ORIGIN
Jeff ,Stewakt' Assistant C
Date: January 10, 2001
EWED BY Date-
1"
710/0/
Mary Strenn, City Manager
ACTION TAKEN
21
153
DISCUSSION
The Human Resources Department has initiated the recruitment, testing and selection process for the job classification
of Senior Planner and has posted the notices of the examinations in accordance with the Citys Municipal Code and the
City's Personnel Rules and Regulations
It is recommended that the City Council approve the examination plans that contain the following examination
techniques and weights for each portion of the examinations
Senior Planner (Open - Competitive)
Career Preparation Interview & Structured Technical Interview Weighted 100%
I r 1I
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: New Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Kilroy Corporation regarding application to the Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (MTA) 2001 Call for Projects — Imperial Highway
(southside) Streetscape Enrichment Project, between Nash Street and Pershing Drive
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
After Kilroy Corporation's presentation of this Imperial Highway landscape project, the
Council may authorize staff to submit an application for the MTA 2001 Call for Protects
(Estimated project cost = $1 6 million — Local Agency Match, which can include funds
from public and private sources = $320,000)
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
(Background and Discussion begins on the next page.........)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
FISCAL IMPACT Potential City matching expenditure of $320,000
if MTA approves the grant application
Operating Budget
Amount Requested
Account Number
Protect Phase
Appropriation Required None at this time
ORIGINATED BY a Date
Andres Santamana. Director of Public Works JAN 10 2001
D BY 1-7 f_ Date.
22
N \COUNCIL0IUANUARYI6 04 (Wednesday V10101 9 00 A M)
/5j
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Kilroy Corporation requested that the City of El Segundo submit an application for this
project to the MTA for funding in the 2001 Call for Projects Kilroy also developed the
cost estimates for the proposed project Only municipalities are allowed to submit
applications The last date for submitting applications is February 2, 2001
The overall limits of the project is Imperial Highway from Aviation Boulevard and
Pershing Drive The project is proposed to be split into three (3) phases The
application for the 2001 Call for Projects would only contain Phase One
Phase One
Landscaping and streetscapjng of the southside of Imperial Highway between Nash
Street and Pershing Drive
This project is entirely within the El Segundo City limits and includes a City entrance
sign at the Imperial Highway /Main Street intersection An additional City entrance sign
funded by the business community is also proposed at the southwest corner of the
Imperial Highway /Sepulveda Boulevard intersection to compliment this protect
Application Modal Category Transportation Enhancement Activities
Estimated project cost $1 6 million
Minimum Local Agency match requirement 20% _ $320,000
(These funds can be from public or private sources)
Phase Two (future project not included in the MTA Cali for Proiects application)
Landscaping and streetscapjng of the center median islands and the northsjde of
Imperial Highway between Aviation Boulevard and Pershing Drive estimated to cost
$2 4 million
Phase Three (future project not included in the MTA Call for Proiects application
Artwork lighting improvements to enhance the areas under the Century Freeway (1 -105)
with an estimated cost of $6 6 million
N \COUNCILOWANUARV16 04 (Wednesday 1/10/01 900 A M A 1 5 6
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE. January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
AGENDA DESCRIPTION
Discussion of ongoing electrical power Issues
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
Discussion and /or possible direction to staff
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
FISCAL IMPACT N/A
Operating Budget
Amount Requested
Account Number
Project Phase
Appropriation Required Yes_ No
ORIGINATED
--),. f
-John Gaines, Council Member
DATE January 10, 2001
REVIEWED BY DATE
Mgr St nn, City Manager
157 23
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
AGENDA DESCRIPTION
Request to determine Council Interest In and representation at the National League of Cities'
Congressional City Conference 2001 entitled "Investing In Communities — Investing in
America's Future," to be held March 9 -13, 2001 in Washington, D C
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION'
Discussion and /or possible direction to staff
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION,
This conference has not been budgeted for in Fiscal Year 2000 -2001 An appropriation will
be necessary to cover expenses for any representative(s)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Conference brochure
FISCAL IMPACT The cost to attend the Conference is approximately $2,330 per person
An appropriation will be required
Operating Budget
Amount Requested
Account Number
Pro)ect Phase
Appropriation Required Yes, No
ORIGINATED DATE. January 10, 2001
Z&
Nancy W6mick, Council Member
REVIEWED BY DATE. January 10, 2001
Mary Strenn, City Manager 9D/
158 24
2001 will begin u ith a new
President a new Congress
and a new domestic agenda for
Investing in Communmes
spearheaded by \LC and a
coalition of more than N national organizations
\Frtb this changing scene in 1l zshington
you can t afford to muss thz 2001 Congressional
Cin Conference March 9 13 at the
11 ashingion Hilron and Towers
The new President and 107th Congress
,,ill assume office with ancrhing bur a clear
mandate from the wtea A msputed
Presidential election and razor thin Republican
malo,nies in the House and mate suggest per
halo a manrtate for a new bioarnsan coalition
ma, sea pontical differences aside in Fator of
aerie%ing consensus on tough public poucy
issues
\LC's Incoming President Dennis Archer is
leading the effort to ensure that the Investing in
Commumues agenda resomres with the new
Unutrusttation and Congresx Ile agenda calls
on the new leadership to' invest in gmmc , s
future by creating new partnerships that
build a vital and prosperous future for all of
,imzna s mmmuiuues The sit point action
focuses on
✓reducing povern by improving public
education lob tiauung and public [tans
portation
✓investing in revitalizing existing cornmumires
and providing affordable housing
✓budoutg and macricamung local infrastructure
✓intestine in children youth and families
✓supporting and protecting local authority and
responsibdin- and
✓promoting equal opportunity for all
10 REASONS TO ATTEND THE
2001 CONGRESSIONAL CITY CONFERENCE
1 'iou Il izarn first hand about me new
. ions vision for imenca darer¢
in, .omm, tour v ears and now that v aeon connects
u i I \ LC s Inv esunz in Core ^,umnes plan
�7 lou II hear abou, the plar� ard agendas for
G. ,tic I0 -,n Conerass and Fw [tie new races
,ill mGuence leeislante action u, '00,
3 1 ou L help shape• \LC s pnonties and tires
. >age on the Invetna in Cornmurunes agenda
amo uih zuide our advocac work in'_001
4 lo[. II hear from neuiv elected and newly
. aopomted leaden in 1lashmgion who if
snare their perspecmes on key issues affecting
cams and mo its I
The Congressional Cnv Conference provides
a unique opporrumw to learn about he% you
can help advance the agenda and be part of a
unified and powerful voice to Volungton en
behalf of .immns roitvnunines
5 low U have a chance in meet wrath }roar.
. Corumissionail delegation to discuss local
priorities for naaonal action and influence haw
tnev II Note on key issues
6 5 ou U learn me federal perspective on a
. wide range of issues affecting your an such
a, eleeuoruc commetee egwry takings, pnvaev
ho isutg and investrnmt in mfraswcnm
7lou Ube able to attend special Leadership
. Trauung Institute seminars that will
increase the value of your v an to %ashmgton
8lou U share a <pmmces and
. nemork with local leaders
from throughout the country
91ou II see old friends and
. make news ones
10lou 11 be a ket player as
. part of the \LC team at 1
the national level - and you II be
able to make a difference for your
hometown
Come to CCC 2001 to learn,
exchange ideas and make the
connections that utll male a
difference in 2001
L.,
6
•'a \M
9 7
CCC 2001 will feature legislative and
policy sessions, workshops, and meetings
on Capitol Hill wath congressional and
administration leaders to focus on the
federal Issues that will be most critical
to canes and towns in 2001 and beyond
Examples of some issues that will be
covered at CCC 2001 include
ELECTRONIC
CO\RIERCEEQUM
The I Oeth Congress tailed to resoh, the key issue
hang non and rotes as online shopping become, a
wan of life and threatens the town of tradtuora!
retad,rs and the sales tax as a viabr, source of roe
enu, for bdu pubhc senses Uhl, Cong,.,
debated but did not fmalue legislation in 200b
states and lad go"mmeam mnnnud to cork
together to develop a streamlined sal s tax , s
tom that unold snmpldy tax swo:ms and reduce
the burden of collemon on mterstan ymdorz
Learn w hat s ahead as vas unponant ouch,
policy debate wnunues
TELECO\RIU\TCATIO \S 4 \D
MUNICiPkL RIGHTS -OFA� M
Cammuivauons technology ins changing sea
rapidly that the separate services that east
today cull smn be a thing of the pee The
bundWig of communcanons senores such as
telephone cable broad band Interne is already
happening Cores need to work
u en cal government coabr o is
ana the urecomn oaooaos
utd, n to ensure the. contra
u,d aomonn aver then nghu
+a. and then rights to tax
tell omrtiuncanons ssr
v i,o Id, rabl, }mu udl hay,
the opportune to learn what
apprm:hzs edl be taken by teat
ncx anmuusvanon and
Cangrm m reguls"g and dire,
lair - no M, issues and will
N pro%ided u i h a local offi,ul
end, or box to moue, min
spar n-hn, of wz,
PREEMPTiO\
lr MIA cities and towns on on, and last one on
k, preemption baules Th, R,i Yiou, Land Ls,
aid Insuwuonalad Person i, RLL I P I -a
sievn,ant prmnpwo of lo,a zoora ac,hnrr.
xv sr nod into lax But pressor, into Iu,si oW
eras Id th, :coat, Jud e,ar [.omman. m all
don , trots to pass m %cram, of aid ^z I,ei
Lan that could irtl,ratrse Taal land us, r
Learn how th, re oniciS land m, „i,uu r
Lt Tt cities w _'001 and now lo.a au nrr t ar,
" th, 107 th Congress
THE DIGITU DR IDE
Tchnolog% onto roiodibl, opp'irnirn , ,
aced communcanwn enhan,d pohh, il. a
wonr and aa,v aces, to Pont, " tco and Pew
mlormauon Govemnent ho.,,, ltd an a.r ail
rol, in ensuring that all imencan, ha„ th, opnini.
I run to learn and have aces to the advantages of
high technologt \LC s Imesung m Commumnes
agenda calls on the public and private sectors to uvrk
together to clunmate the digital dnid, Learn about
roles mponstbilates and opporriwtia for ensuring
that techoolog% doesn t conic a cider gas benxn
hoses and have nots in our cotnmurrues
S\LJLRT GRORTH
',LC \ n, prendenr Karen %nderson is launching
a tear long laws on budding qualm .ommurunes
that udl address ken issues related to growth and
deveopment in this nee eentun \k hat role "I
C ongreas play in grouch and dadopm,nt nssw�
affecting our communues'eland to uansprimuren
eronottuc development and regtonal
approa.hes to meet shared needs
IOLTH � \DF4\BLIFS
I , to . , ens, i, uk,1 m ,ran, a r id,
r. e, =r i lrio aPa Gig ch,fd,,n yrurh and
11i6,. "m, of the muL that udl b on IN
i, J,-a, ac, rda mJud, a, ulahht, of h,alth care
,w it om, tamiln, and ,hiloren reautho
im i i- i tr, J,m,rtar, and s„oodar, edu.a
n •� a -: tundoz for th, with robs pro,,
h - + p -11 i add "„ ka roues
tr„ ar tird,un,rtal m AI t , In,oune in
t ammi.r w., ao,rJ, m,ludme sopponmz pea
gams that are recognved for thou sum in devel
opuig children and youth. s[tengthoung public -do
cation and ensuring adequate o sourm to meet the
basic needs of our families trcludmg health care and
child we
PRR 1CY
fast stress in technology is inceaongiv raising
questions about my access to enfdemal and per
wa udortru ion It is also raising questions about
what In el of government should make decenons
about pined requiranents and how those require
ments will affect local govammens parucularh
expanded Labdnty Learn about eztstsng regulatwm
that wrA bane an import on atlas and uan and
other looming prawn requnefeents
— that local officals should be aware of
DURASTRUCTURE
The fimste of our commumues
depends on budding and reauntawng
the Wraswauie best suited to then
needs for the 21st cmtury — including
transportation udrasmucture M% four
mental infrastructure and union and
enogv mGastructtrre Vatat Les
ahead on the continuing public debate
about electric utility deregulaoonr VAI Congress
address conning wastewate infrastructure issues
111ut s likely in be on the agenda on lieu
transportation issues including railroads wrier rier safety and other surface
:g transportation issues'
PUBLIC SAFETY
Lod offrtails are fundamenraBy resportn
ble for ensuring public safety in then
commuri But the federal government
on and should play a key role in support
ing these efforts Key public safety cssua
hkehy to be on the congressional agenda
include n authonrztion of the acme bill
and formula changes in the Lewd Lau
Enforcement Block Grant which is a vital
source of supplemental funding for local
pubhc safm vutunves
HOUSING
The Investing in Communities agenda urges
Congress to be a key player in the future of our
communities by urreznng of the re ritalmtwn of
eosung communtia and supporting the avadabtlin
of affordable Iva andmmd
erate -unrome housing both
for homcownerslup and
_ Most The 107th Canners
could take up a range of
housing issues such as
federal wumves to incense
t�ttt�a a the supply of affordable
housing and federal funding
for new production as cell
as matching grants in state
_ and local government for
preservation
16 0
FUU,DAY SF.NEiARRS
FRHK MARCH 9
TRl \4DR.vtlllOtlL IEIDER4�
Sw.ts fDit nor 21sT Ceartw
RrglnmmnF SIM
Cm, Gmnpnm. Camemone
ce s with dzesill,,duncecurepalup sac
ens ,e P dim and tout,, m h an
chance process, lot w,ll loam the prima
clu and aof ,uamfommagcul
lad'andure eft.h lodenlupgdsm
become more zhevve N vow mie u a IoW
lead' PamePanu wlll wdemuand ram
traauto rul kadenshp pmv and
mflueoce conmbure to pmfeawul auerm
lot will do Ion rdmlquen to mptme
sow sat« m tunung blockaea and ten
m m mw Ied'dup oppommun
lvnuam
Carol. C \A H. NmW,, \eo,
\.,.a
Smk Ecx IL� tiro DE®o\
\L>.s1\G Pot ElrcrID Om17.
9a,am -'wpm
Rrguammon Fee SIM
Cmr Campeu-, Cad,'
,ua
Thu utor.1 on dndopmIl the on�
oaf g nratmc leadmlup aril ecd for
madam, by datd of ,.1, It mmr,o us
a lour hour a,meual oncue deo'd to
hen, puuapadu detemmu, met, m &,dd
state, leadenlup sole P..W. add
gam an uodasundmg of he or m, of
access ooenoaJ w meet„ go,,mute, m
a logh chore, and <tullmgmg poi"
emomn.t Thev u,ll a6o be abler w us,
step svamai, leadershp and anal se•
urg preens -muu tram commum.n
Imo w,
Carl \eu Lakewood Colorado
AFTERNOONSEM ARS
FMAx MARCH 9
E, U L \TL\G nor Ckmt F- UaTltE
Omrsa
J,Pm ,u,pm
Regueanor Fee 395
Cu.a Lomp•m., C'm,m Wd heammoner
Lhue elm,, olu. hl, I hold er dot
ecvu,<ac.0 ,c ourhu,h'oa -,pct
wrman,<amd Ne ig m, dud of Ne otga
maauon . forg Ne duet ed came u
fora¢,mmar for man,dmd oRh,
nos omuur u dnlgnd w nplam N,
.J ,11 helot m,mgannstrwuw fe mm,,
and mu help mason and marts wnh,e,
viporunt res , ..or Cho nn,
no rout ws sesslom w i' gar a
Id o wM Nee t.. p,[
Nd hOw Nn �n a,[ryl he Ix!Da[ Vin
,dad dunng m <ge P.,or .m The
semmu evl engage mornpanu m err ate
raw semen out porodmg todo"_u
and
o,."oceof ffiloj taedbrka
N, nip un,,o oNKd
vmuv
Juba \oak Cr, \lamga R .
\ I look
Chna oe wren'
CowJ,dme, b' Fon fnlWu
Colorado
How m \L� YOLR 4n
13tpet -, Mew -
R,.00anm.F SIS
Co+e Cmgermn Competent Pruvtoner
Thal u vat oppomuun to gun skids wth
a step by step ,w.e m desdop unplemem
and naluam A markzwg Plan m stow..
wan Eamu,efirnemukeungmd
ummwuoum smateme that lad "e,,
nits rare, used mob. alum '"plan
for the mnsca that then Doe and c.mun
pm,sd, Pwopamhandouromeludethe
\ LC Local Oliloils Gwde Hoa to
4mkzt lour Gn co sporuord bs 3C \I A
stern w
R•rhad UFine E:ar,m Diener
3C \Li Herndon
CamJl, Azllogg
Manager Alukemg
1 on %k
.n hmaal Lagoa
'(Gu Uashmgn.n DC
LGC OFrxivs GLIDETO \if k
RE ono\\
) DJ P m -, OOP+
Regunano.Fre S95
Co+e Coepetmn Commuaueamr
Tens hghs munef,, semNU wdl mach
pmue ap. ho. to look and round them
bast whm ddmg asN Ne medu T\
Dow and Dann -from mie deadop
m' wsuaeDnd NIRVI ..
1. rill loo how w hudlle tough eta
INS urrmm,e I.., and stoat �
n hot wpla Also loo boa to d,,Jop
ore mesaaga as WI u
how to dress .e uar.t and g. w,eh
enecw.mns
mw *o
%kao m, Auuh Commumacov
\l ur i¢ton DC
FUT JrDA SEMLVAR
SATURDAY \LARCH 10
EfF i Lent G Swat
9 Guam - , Vfpm
Rn m att. Fee 39,
Can Le,t, , Commmurn.,
boor borne w a lean half of all lad
and manage, ume u spent lemon,
k.,1 ha. cram, Nee ere uum more
than err other a: min ,wept breathing
.d {<man ,alone ac ommeug for at lent
a. ,,•tend or ow mmmutuaum Pauap
tar lr, moon people move lees formal
vaiunq m I veome skills dun ans oiler
acorn or ull that the, uNme m them
work and nenda, I,en Thu semuur 7 d
devgn w prm,d, eve w,N both k..1
edge and pnnlW era,, to enhance you,
Ctmu.ns as a leader b, desdopmg and
Imrmed -e,ou us more slut.
-
\a,. a+ad�a \, d.�vl Cum Group
T u .. (k,edapmm
\Ian, -std \atom, Cum Group
Trumma avf Ll-.Jopmm
IJr.in, Vi m¢an
MORN NG S W Ni ARS
SATURDAX MARCH 10
RESw- %� Co\Ttjm
CO \51L t Anaa\SLO - SIG \LL
9 n -Senn
Regutronon Fee S95
Core Compeleru Cdlabow.,
Effeane mmmumotwo u the Idebleod of
ever, td ...sh, that,00 hose and a
sum, deal , of your success or
fa ure In fact caul xsmuse enamor
drat at least 7 S peat., of ill eNLtss stun
from emmawom, srvle ddien o.
As a umnpant to Nor workshop you ar1l
d.ufy tools to st rofwtly redo¢ mile
an L(e and unprme I. pafanaul
d persolul aelauouhvpc Sou till aim
deeelop aretegln to mourage others to
be mote r:yuse to sow more, This
engaging and fun program has been a
fawnm among deed olTlaah from all
leeelsa govemmmt
la.0 e,
Rlwnda HA,, Agreemelt
D.. Inc aeaNe
Uashrg,m
AcS T,G SLC 1 k' ?L 3C
BM OF✓wzcmRi LtsowNFRO\1
9 W am - Noon
Rrglslrvnen Fee S93
Cmr Cmnpea.n f Inpnmt Pruavomr
Puhhc Bonds of Diawn have a dFeten,
aPermena and open,, m a dacrululg but
workable msvaun.t mdav -op. r..,dc
.pen meeon, eve ctuaau. ad media
anardm Theseaora appinessu
lesson form eff.o,,ol .6 to v
ya
o,unel41" you ap.fw ndlmgwa to
elt.,rourperfamanceua PubIK
Pond of Dlreaon Gm el,h..d
Widen. and mor v to take cum bad
home
Immu,tm
We Sued Heathrow Flonda
WGH Wpl RfaAnov9iB
STRVPlaR3 -PA I
9w0 , \mm
Regutmnm Fee $93
tie Cmnprlmn C.mmmuomr
Gun mvght row sow mouvamrs behae
d amour as a,el u of thou arouM
u faro lmv pasolatry tats mlluma
the wee, you thud, plan bum. genmm
Ides process mf.mlaum take ra4 ony
out lob onloonvbdur. dal arth change
and mnnae a nth people Ism the meta
vry dement, of mom .. w build a
sung coumvm on.. you and you
omnw.n
leseoctm
Todd 4 vod Lou.,nik Amend,
AFTERNOON SENENAR
SATURDAx MARCH 10
$RLITIMLL LL3pF]LSIt� Fqt 11lGAL
OfnO.3t5
Rgat,. anm Fee 395
Cmr uuame.. Comodupa
Du sou kmw your lodenhy style and ram
'Art, dK people around You Tim gel
.1
al that remulu der to teal local dand.Ifi
Dais and gnaoroeot leaden to dunk dater
erdy about Index up and sat umgw
kadetshapar,le Aou%dlleamhoww
adapt our ladadup mie to duffer., or.
area and the perorpoon of othen dray
nloe the desdopmmt Ind or yao mo
.rent and or empiwee and men man,^
vowmiewtheunuu.n Puta,W.wII
learn ulut'h ladmhap role u moor app
Doom m dfHmnt.m.. The smuo.
rµa up w,m a font mend train olto
goal radung avnua aid peasow iron
plain
im
haN, timer Travung oluuo-
Gaoup Fat \ \aeM Indlara
Tam CoLRAGE To UE -
12STEr3g1lE GIOLR Cm
1 30 pen -a W , .
Regurreenm Fee S95
Gore Compsmn Gdm
Leadmg vow an am be hen and prod",
. e -you feel tour you are uukmq a then,
Dry
for wm.00w and to the future T.,
cement tacsea to nlupmng maven rd
eunel m..bm to hose the mlrag, to I,td
and pondmg sample pose techou un of
lodenlup m maenad govammen Loo
the duce duawwsan that ,terms, leaders
hive m tanmon (11 AN Defmm -
b�eurm that they an ecru, the lau e
v uwav ulna doer. and. C
Team Budding - bebne that one must
desdop paten N order w a¢ampi.h
gmla (3)Coodueor- beheve that the,
need w uupnne alms w ere, to empm'
.then m nuke dmvms
lumrnme
Lyle Sumek Heath. Flo"
HIGat-L \m5 Rfi.l�
SnmTEGmx -KRrR
130 Pna - S OOpi-
Regumehou Fee S95
Core Compamnn Colhbooawr
F.pand your bunt relauondup soils mnh
smtegla and mob w dead uuh extreme
behassnn ouch" kom tails ,mtec
u uuma. bull. and .0 pmpl, to
rune)uaafew Learnhowmtaenorthe
wughm person beouu,.0 wsg bt arm,d
w th daf g Deuce Nat cork' Gam th,
abdnty w took Ilrsmd the ulmmos pert.,
mro that pople mast haw of oeh oNa
Ded.p a bens undasureim, of the
avegwhv valsnnsa and mot,aura,, of
cut. Aloe mpoundv gam ate& wen
host to ma, em, N.,W N ratsell
and If. m vow.mmu.,
Todd Aramod Llusvdle hentu,k,
Cottali to of Adun,mmt to
LeadeNOp program dram bad elen,d
officals to orgamee them pmftvwmul
devel.pmml around mud skdls rem
wary for eHeca a kad.%i p. live prd
gram a built amurd bee con ladenhnp
mmpeteocna for I e.l elected officals
aslh web Ladershap Tnwng hutnute
Semitar addreneng one of the followvlg
(1) Co...,
12) C.mpttmt Pnctmonm
Ifl Cummumeator
Ill Cogab.nmc
(5) Gil. +n
161
r
QIMMW. .«
9 00 a m S OU p m Leadership Traimag humor Seminars
> P p on h 30 p in Onertmon Session for Fin Tine lnmdees and
\eu h Eleaed Officials
i 30 p m 7 00 p m Consurumcv and apeaal Group \lemngs
SATURDAY MARCH 10
900am 'OOpm NLC Board of Directors Meeting
900am sOupm \LC U,cwn Counnl \L<un¢
0 00 a m > 00 p R Leadership Trauun, Inuaw, Jemuus
1000am \cor
'001 Lnudu,e Bne.,
I Do p R 3 00 p,u
Polo Commmee \lain"
\ion
• Human Development AHD
• imormancn Tzchnolog and Commumanons
Ro.r, n. \eranrlunc and Ln.K
(ITC
7 •: pm
• Energ% Emvenm.m and \alural Resources
,n a n ro a m
(EE \R
+hprr tIspm
Polo Ciumrt.\ leames
I a 14 a R
• Comm.r, and Emmm.c Development
\ocr I
ICED
• Traruponamn [nmo ,aure and Knees (TIS
• Fiance {dnurcvm, on aril Inurgovemmeral
Mario.I F{IR
• PabL< Sum and C,,,, Pre%mnon (P-,CP,
00 p r
Conti and rpa a Gro,.p \Im,,"
SUNDAY MARCH 11
A a r s w a y
Sreennc Cc.101ce \Izeuree
Cmnoal Secs err err (nrur ss,ow Pnanna
• Human De%e,opmm HD
\ion
• INOrmauon Trrhnoiog and Commwuauons
ITC
Ro.r, n. \eranrlunc and Ln.K
• Energ En,vomnz^ and \atura! Resourzes
7 •: pm
(EE\R
,n a n ro a m
anal Cmee Coun.0 -.mare C"arcner Vlerwg
lu Man
Cdzcra z Dnv u,
I a 14 a R
Genera! n¢,ion
\ocr I
Rourdublz \rm irk -, a: J L,.•
Y Comr,.v err. ±E.Oran Cb.crmm, CED
Y Tnr•mra o- In.asra. Aare and �zrvvca iTl�
Y F.rave i..^ a or ay. Irteraove ^anenm
Hlh
*Pubes,s " and C" Preveruan'hCPI
I , —
G.�ea mss err or I- s, �c r Carnumnzs
• ern r p—
C'. wrc aid snY a. Grocp \Imes Emma
6 00 p ct - A p r
Oper,rt Rmep on arc Emzrsm„mzr,
MONDAY MARCH 12
9 N a in
10 30 a n
Cmnoal Secs err err (nrur ss,ow Pnanna
10 • a m
\ion
G,ru, l szssion on {J,,v.nn.,cr Pnont zs
1 a• p m
Ro.r, n. \eranrlunc and Ln.K
7 •: pm
(arc_
•n. pm
""P-
P m
6Ap^
Cons i mina
'0uam 1000am fnude bus swum rarr,he \ \uh Amon Hetan to
Capaal H d
Exl%mormng cut<\lumvipal Leagur and
Bnennas
9 00 a in I1 00 a in Roundnble �cxr, on Captol HJI
Ww"Mil "IN
Sunda), March 11 _ s
CELEBRATE DIVERSITY BREAKFAST
830am. 1000am 'e
Regutrotu rl fee W fW onsrm)
Delegates and guests at CCC 2001 are mated to Celebrate Dsvasrty in
Amass Crum and Tours at the 16th armual breakfast sponsarei by five
NLC constituency groups Asun Pacific Amman MumcgW Officials
(APANIO), Gay Lesbun and Bisexual Loaf Officials (GLBLO), Hispanic
Elected laid Officials (HELO) National Black Caucus of Local Elected
Officials (NBC/LEO), and Wamm in Mumapal Gavernmeat (WINfG)
The breakfast will teattue a guest speaker who will pronde a perspective on
issues facing lad olfwals and lmma s arms and towns
CAPITOL STEPS
Bark by popular demand the Capitol Steps will perform on Sunda% March I I
2001 at the Opening Reception It doesn't matter whether you are Demovral
Independent or Republican this show is brpattsam_ (ten for evenoae
DATES To REkamER
February 2, 2001 Deadline for advance registration and housing
requests All requests must be pwrmarked by this date After this date all
delegates must register onsate at lather rates
February 2, 2001 Deadline for nnmellations- Cancellation letters must b,
postmarked b) the date and are subject to a $30 cancellation charge There
are on refussds for arallanons after this date - -
How To REGISTER
To register for the 2001 Congressional City Conferma BB out the registration
farm and return at with vow check am purchase order a aedst card
udormation to the NLC Meeting Sen)ces posmnarked by February 2 2001 or
register online at wvrw nle org
• Each delegate, gum speaker member of the press, and anv other confer
eme pamopant must register Thee rs a Ss0 with delegates fee There
is no charge for press regtsvationn u uh proper press credenuals
• No telephone registrations or cancellations will be accepted
• Payment (check atv purchase orde- or credit card I must be included with
advance n:gtsvauors
• People unable to meet the Februan 2 deadline w dl hale to register onsne
at the meeting and make their our hotel resenauons
• Refunds will be mad, tar cancellations received bs February 2, 2001 sub
jot to a $30 cancellation charge Cancellation letters must be postmarked
b) dus date No telephone cancellations %ill be accepted No partial
refunds will be made if you decide not in attend particular function
I 6>1M_,
* If you need hotel accommodations, please check the appropriate box on
the regrstranon form
* \ LC w dl make a hotel reservation for you when you register for the con
ference
* Rooms u dl be assigned an a fast came, fast served basis
* ill conference sessions will be held at the Washington Hilton Howl
162
163
- - - - -r_ -- - - - - --- - - -- --------------
NLC CONGRESSIO\AI. CITY CONrERENCE REGISTRATION AND HOUSING FOR`I
k�uhmgton Hilton Hotel and Tower
a Washakgton, DC - March 413, 2001
Ad ance Regn'nnon Deadbne Febniar) 2.2001 a
Onbne conFereoee regv=itonat hap / /www.nlc.org
10 hmomg or regutmhan wdl be prxerred wthoot aeoonpanymg payment m folL
Me)o�a.Han aa,.al.Fwmad oRr,d
OTHER atmrr GIRD L%TOP LLTIO\fwwx .wPnvn
4e.w a mouth dupaonc
I
Fast Omt mNerm¢ itmldect }®(S m once
lmW W \.M+ Gei W tmm 0.e
I
nNObcormdertmsaHaad s�aFa�
,�,,,,,,,.„
I
\one Sa
I
ioar _
Or, Or wauon
oGmin Ob rPoLi.nmoi��...aw..m�.s ...
MJm4 lddrm
wREwmt
o.a.
,�anBrms. w.tmao,•w o.s,.....m. Q� ®.ur�+e.rq.,•
Gn Zp
HOTEL
'
Phone�� l
mm>RESMATIO�&.mm.m�na�m,�te
�'dW wPnunm. �a.aK1W Bmun.L
EmaY _
nv�witlynetlmhmmWltredc
\me
C Place tnrke my hmd ea a a u uwared bdoe
Jpou (5'I t
C I do sm mgooe hood...damtu at m. of the holds Imd bdw
Md \vole' 14 and wide no tx _ _ A4e
❑ Place -- off o,9 dmg case womuooa
I
\wsh Dae4ate \.I 11, IS Sh tee A4e
RkffiFATIONRFgLtsFL\FUR \L177(T\
•4d uFau.mmwua aqe �PU.m. v,-�.. .am :wm�wn.o\IC.wr ua un
Amo D¢ —/ D
nak g
1 bd ._ Jmakmq
Soubi(
(pcsotd
Dwbie (2 bd' �. \m Jmokmg
SPE CoRFFREI� R.TLS
C Doublrrpouble ('- FaFk /' bedc)
o bk (2I
11 S
11 520 Jpaase'Guen Inca .rhmdaWel $
GI 5.0 loath Delegate $
SPEQ.LL HOL'SL\G REQLTm (rr aherrWve aamtde rmms. rte)
H15,3 }wsh Clupcm.�rolapPll.abr so rixutofi ws $
©If)w hale sR dhoom40r vuup noo reds piece mmn \LC \kung
I
sen,m
AM{ \u RmsmkT10\ FEES(Posma.bedb Tbn 2 mol)
I AU Be Shanng\I) R. Wi h
C2 560 \LCNML Ai.'mba-• $
Co-o¢ t I,.
J D.'S760 Assma¢llenbe -• 3
C E2 P60 SW Klwber• $
uawe•d.. .r.ewimm.®em. m.os e.. nr.e.�•..e•my.w
❑ E2 SAS \. Mertes Otke-••• S
�+•T O<..'.m .n o.
L,EADERSHiP TRnL\L\G L\SfTIL -IE $E.LL\11tS fFMw ifarrh91oo1)
L�w'6fdm�nN Terly 1 ArLe Grub lmbo Ze'I�aadidw{.des
B' EI>0 Trmaamuomd l- aderslup J4Ju tw e4: is` CenNr. $
_ B_ $1,0 Jo om, Lada rr, S Dimon \laa_i. Eis� Offs ah $
coot HOM s UDK otol¢ HOr[I. sewer
- C' S9• Evdmwe thr Cha E..-mo,r Or, 3
I' — \� IN is L _ Hsemxaa uu ias
_ ( -5+, Houo\IVea lom Cm S
'B Hr 1u a sr,
_ US+, L,, Gln..af, GWa, to .l.dll R,,i. $
is _XUa K.M;m NUG ne 1 _B�luu6lW r1i 1L
LEI sE wTRV\i\G L\srra-IE SEMmRS(Sanurdo+ )famh io 2001 1
t'sa -eo J _p. ®uMbu Hs-u
_
= D $1,0 Enern.e Lumvrs Jkd,. 3
m_txd.. umnu a _nyex.b, n« n
E' $4 Raolnns Card'um ionmum.u,ai w.ceu.uws 5
It —Rol, y,� su,u ,�_nweo,lxa u, H
_ E1 S90 lchaon wR 4
Pa- Buu-P,
'r — FanK.a.,iw, x«a $i= h
EJ 5+ Htgn Impan ReanotW,p �mtma - Par I $
moc I
F 5, Awuo v aaa F for Lail On„ia, E
Hum D paci Lvomtlna
= F Sa Tnr Caoasrm Lao- - tr io lrun3loW l,�n 3
111 ttu1N aedls andsare"oodna. muaaa Fad. AU deli rom'm'^n cmd'•+e aJei
_ F, S, h,en lmya kruuowu: vnl...5 Par II $
.a,ctwud.mu vvahvbnuvd vdpWmme lad NLRKFEAnpam.ar.mal +rvl aR V,btm
mxaa aPa..l
SPEB E%
_ B S GLKF�
S 5.,�.,n Fn g
Refs, rRe¢RFr'srltAra.4\v Htxa\c FORatTv
_ CI S- HELO v -�.m Fa y
HELD
IC
F. %auluae odut.d
E] b \P/] LEO R.uFnor b
nnean od.a od.
Nd
— GI S o \l1 \IG Lwl,hmn
\5nsrwa
_ H, S' Julula, Co,brate DP.ersm Br..J4 n (PoHmuked b1 212101) 3
&al A—,e
TOT \L REGISTR \TIO \FEE 5
It =t2 .r�O Hod
I
lnrr Fmnw : •lhate tee Sra� ^(Ta t. Fn S,J, •••lRSllt Fen 3,J.
3m la
Fvta...1 mn
REGmRmo\ PmmEN7 L\TOR\L1T10\
LIL ST BE CHECKED FOR HOTEL RESER%ITIO\I
FUR.tpRE L \TOR\L,TM]A.
c} R, m. REGFTRAT(\ \FEE v iv .la{ or\1ur,d h,ud hlw
pa
mrtcauamuwalr
t, REGI,TR1T10\ FEE m d, p n h m \.,rood Lo.,o.f Cntm
I
_ Pur.has. (hde tar REGI,TR4Tk1\ FEES rust n s. , F, m shr gvrhu. ands
"k ""'r"°if1OA'�R'rr"aa`
HOTEL
U.w r, HOT LDEKN7T
— (noses MOTELEPO(i tom. _da ad mod n.,.
Chedmr HOTEL rnn duet thole;
_ Pwcnue Order,, HOTEL DEP( *IT isuoma Juet1
HOTEL
I
CREW CARD FHORrzAno\
���►
L--
'
r
®
�iI
®l�
'
OMEN
163