No preview available
2000 JUL 18 CC PACKET4s, EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City- related business that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council and/or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portion of the Meeting Additionally, the Public can comment on any Public Hearing item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing portion of such item. The time luxurt for comments is five (5) minutes per person. Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state Your name and residence and the organization you represent ifdesired Please respect the time limits Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2 00 p in the prior Tuesday) The request must include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not exceed five (5) minutes in length In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk. 607 -2208 Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 18, 2000 - 5:00 P.M. Next Resolution # 4168 Next Ordinance # 1119 5:00 PM Session CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION: The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, et seg ) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator, and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation, and/or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel), and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as follows CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956 9(a)) 1. City of El Segundo v Bd of Airport Commissioners, et al., LASC Case No. BC 220609 2 Ralston v. El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 036223 3 Hill v El Segundo, USDC No CV 98- 1463- LGB(SHX) 4 V alone Williams v Brian D Evanski, et al, LASC Case No. 99CO2571 5. Venegas v. El Segundo, LASC Case No BC207136 6 In re Randall's Island Family Golf Centers, Inc., U S Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, Case No 00 -41065 Phillips Petroleum, et al v County of Los Angeles, et al, USDC No. 1938 -MRP (MANx) Shell Chemical Company, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al., USDC No 1917 -GHK (RCx) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956 9(b)• -0- potential case (no further public statement is required at this time), Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c) -3- matters DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) — None CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957 6) — City Representative Mary Strenn and Richard Kopenhefer. Employee Organizations City Employees' Association, Supervisory & Professional Employees' Association, El Segundo Firefighters' Association, El Segundo Police Officers' Association, and all unrepresented employees CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956 8) — None. SPECIAL MATTER— Interviews of candidates to the Recreation & Parks Commission, Planning Commission, Economic Development Advisory Council. and Library Board of Trustees Recommendation — Interview candidates. 0Ct2 ! r3 # AGEND] EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City- related business that is within the lunsdiction of the City Council and/or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portion of the Meeting Additionally, the Public can comment on any Public Hearing item on the Agenda during the Public Heating portion of such item The time lumt for comments is five (5) minutes per person Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state Your name and residence and the organization you represent, if desired Please respect the time limits Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2 00 p.m the prior Tuesday) The request must include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not exceed five (5) minutes in length In compliance with the Amencans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 607 -2208 Notification 48 boors prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 18, 2000 - 7 :00 P.M. Next Resolution # 4168 Next Ordinance # 1319 7:00 PM Session INVOCATION - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Council Member John Gaines PRESENTATIONS ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of 850 or more to communicate to the City Council on behallrofanodier, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250 While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda The Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed 003 A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only Recommendation - Approval. B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS - Continued public hearing on the Downtown Specific Plan The Plan area generally encompasses the 100 -500 blocks of Main Street, the 100 -300 blocks of Richmond Street, and abutting properties on Grand Avenue. [Environmental Assessment No EA -474 (Mitigated Negative Declaration), General Plan Amendment No 99 -2, Zone Change No 99 -2 and Zone Text Amendment No 99 -51 Applicant City of El Segundo Propertv owners Various Recommendation — 1) Open Continued Public Hearing; 2) Discussion; 3) First Reading of Ordinance by title only; 4) Schedule second reading and Adoption for August 1, 2000; and/or, 5) Other possible action /direction Public hearing on a proposed fifteen -year Development Agreement for the proposed 1,500,000 square foot El Segundo Media Center project on the 46 -acre former Rockwell International property bounded by Manposa Avenue, Nash Street, Atwood Way, and Douglas Street (Environmental Assessment No EA -515 and Development Agreement No 00 -1) Applicant El Segundo Media Center, LLC. Property owner. Federal Express Corporation Recommendation — Cancel Public Hearing and re- notice for a future meeting. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS — Take action necessary to give notice of a special election regarding the implementation of a special tax on parking lot businesses Recommendation — Adopt the four resolutions attached to the staff report. D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Announce appointments to the Recreation & Parks Commission, the Planning Commission, Economic Development Advisory Council, and Library Board of Trustees. Recommendation — 1) Announce appointments and respective terms of office; 2) Extend expired terms of office; and 3) Continue Schedule of Interviews to __ 12000. C C" 4 E. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously If a call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business Warrant Numbers 2510812- 2511089 on Register No 18A in total amount of $615,383.66, Wire Transfers in the amount of $1,035,923.25, Warrant Numbers 2511090-2511378 on Register No. 19B in total amount of $1,969,204.52, and Wire Transfers in the amount of $279.924.14 Recommendation - Approve Warrant Demand Registers and Authorize staff to release. Ratify: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or agreements; emergency disbursements and/or adjustments; and wire transfers from 06/10/00 to 07/07100. City Council meeting minutes of June 20, 2000 Recommendation - Approval. City Council designation of Waste Management as a single source for disposal of green waste since fiscal year costs will exceed $10,000 (Fiscal Impact — None — transfer of funds to be done from one Public Works Department account to another 1 Recommendation — Approve designation. Request from Hughes Space and Communications (HSC) to hang a 2,500 square feet banner to celebrate the sale of HSC to the Boeing Company. The sign would be located on the west side of HSC building S03A at 901 North Nash Street for one week beginning approximately August 1, 2000 and then relocated to the east side of 2300 East Imperial Highway for approximately 11 weeks from the start date (Sign Plan 00 -12) Applicant- Hughes Space and Communications Recommendation - Approve HSC's request to hang its temporary banner until approximately October 31, 2000. Request for City Council to approve the purchase of twelve in car video systems using Equipment Replacement and Asset Forfeiture Funds totaling $47,348 55. Recommendation — Approve the purchase of twelve Mobile Vision in -car video systems for the new fleet of police units on a sole - source basis. 10 Resolution accepting the road deed and agreement to convey and claim for payment from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) for the Rosecrans Avenue /Aviation Boulevard intersection improvements Recommendation — 1) Adopt resolution. 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the certificate of acceptance for the road deed on behalf of the City. 11 Adopt plans and specifications for 1999 -00 slurry seal of various streets — Project No PW 00- 11 (estimated cost $105.000.00). Recommendation — 1) Adopt plans and specifications. 2) Authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids. 12 Adoption of plans and specifications for the lining of sanitary sewer access structures at various locations — Project PW 00 -12 (estimated cost $60,000 00) Recommendation — 1) Adopt plans and specifications. 2) Authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids. 13 Award of contract for Grand Ave pavement rehabilitation — Project No PW 99 -06 (contract amount = $129,411.63) Recommendation — 1) Award contract to the lowest responsible bidder, All American Asphalt, in the amount of $129,411.63. 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the standard Public Works construction agreement after approval as to form by the City Attorney. 14 Approval of three -year Memorandum of Understanding between the City of El Segundo and the El Segundo and the El Segundo Police Officers Association Recommendation — 1) Approve the Agreement. 2) Adopt Resolution Approving Memorandum of Understanding. 15. Approval of three -year Memorandum of Understanding between the City of El Segundo and the International Firefighters' Association (I A.F.F.) Local 3682 Recommendation — 1) Approve the Agreement. 2) Adopt Resolution Approving Memorandum of Understanding. CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA 0 f t, F. NEW BUSINESS — 16 Request for City Council to (1) approve funding in the amount of $190,000 for the development and implementation of a city operated animal control program, (2) approve a resolution amending Section 8.12.040 of the El Segundo Municipal Code authorizing the increase of licensing fees, and (3) authorize use of the additional licensing revenue to offset the cost of this program. Recommendation — 1) Approve funding and authorize Staff to proceed with development and implementation of program. 2) Approve Resolution to amend 8.12.040 ESMC to allow for dog registration at an increased fee schedule. 3) Authorize use of revenue to offset the increase in the animal control budget. G. REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - NONE H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY - NONE I. REPORTS - CITY CLERK - NONE J. REPORTS - CITY TREASURER - NONE K. REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS - Council Member McDowell - NONE Council Member Gaines - NONE Council Member Wernick - NONE Mayor Pro Tem Jacobs - NONE Mayor Gordon — 17 Announcement of appointment of Mike Gordon as alternate delegate to the South Bay Cities Council of Governments. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals who have received value of 850 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of 8250 While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda The Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed MEMORIALS U.7 CLOSED SESSION The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code Sec. 54960, et sq.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator, and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation, and/or discussing matters covered under Government Code section 54957 (Personnel), and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators, as follows Continuation of matters listed on the City Council Agenda for 5 00 p.m., July 18, 2000 under "Closed Session" (if needed) REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required) ADJOURNMENT POSTED DATE 7 TIME NAME 071FOGag Opp EL SEGUNDO CRY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2000 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Special Orders of Business- Continued Public Hearing AGENDA DESCRIPTION Continued public hearing on the Downtown Specific Plan The Plan area generally encompasses the 100 -500 blocks of Main Street, the 100 -300 blocks of Richmond Street, and abutting properties on Grand Avenue. [Environmental Assessment No. EA-474 (Mitigated Negative Declaration), General Plan Amendment No 99 -2, Zone Change No. 99 -2 and Zone Text Amendment No 99 -51 Applicant- City of El Segundo, Property owners- Various RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION• 1) Open Continued Public Hearing; 2) Discussion, 3) First Reading of Ordinance by title only, 4) Schedule second reading and Adoption for August 1, 2000, and /or, 5) Other possible action /direction BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: (Begins on page 2) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS, 1 Draft City Council Ordinance No 2 Main Street Businesses Chart - First Floor Street -front Level - 1996 -2000 3 Selected portions of Draft Downtown Specific Plan — redline /stnkeout text 4 Photographs of Outdoor Retail Activities 5 Main Street - 300 -400 blocks - Conceptual Alternative Street Configurations 6 Building Heights — Existing and Proposed Measurements 7 Main Street Shuttle Discussion 8 Preliminary Cost Estimate Summary Operating Budget: Amount Requested. Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation required- See Chapter IX- Implementation and Financing See Chapter IX- Implementation and Financing See Chapter IX- Implementation and Financing See Chapter IX- Implementation and Financing Possibly (See Chapter IX- Implementation and Financing) DATE- July 11, 2000 Senior Planner M. Hansen, Director of Community, Economic and Development Services Mary Sfrenfi City Manager DATE: July 11, 200 ?s/e 0909 1 BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: (continued from page 1) On June 20, 2000, the City Council opened the public hearing, took testimony, discussed the project, provided direction to staff, and continued the public hearing until July 18, 2000 The following summarizes and responds to the questions and issues raised by the City Council at the June 20"' public hearing. Issue As written, new offices would not be allowed to occupy a street -front retail /service space Offices would be allowed above and behind street -front retail /service uses The Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP) addresses the question of the replacement of existing street -front offices by allowing the replacement of an office with another office if the space has not been vacant for more than 6 months for the Main Street District During the last five years the trend in the Downtown area has been to replace existing commercial uses with office uses. An analysis was done which tracks the conversion of commercial to office use, on the Street -front portion of the buildings in the 300 and 400 blocks of Main Street. The analysis includes both the number of buildings and square footage Since 1996, the core of Downtown has lost 19% of the retail /service stores (Table 1) with the most drastic change in the 300 block of Main Street. The square footage of the conversion to non - retail /service uses is even more dramatic at a 37% lose During then same time period, the number of offices has increased 78% and the square footage of office space has increased 86% Refer to Attachment 2 for a detailed analysis. TABLE 1 MAIN STREET DISTRICT — STREET -FRONT BUSINESSES Summa 1996 Current Net loss/ gain % loss! ain Retail/ No. 26 21 -5 -19% Service S.F. 38,082 24,129 - 13,953 -37% Offices No. 9 16 +7 +78% S.F. 14,492 27,021 +12,529 +86% In addition to the conversion which have taken place since 1996, in 1993 Jerry's Super Store (1850 S.F.) was converted from retail /service to medical/dental offices and in 1995 EI Segundo Cleaners (2500 S F ) was converted from retail/service to office. Restaurant, medical /dental and recreational uses showed little change during this four -year period 2 0 10 Staff believes that the exclusion of new office uses on the street -front is essential to achieving the community's vision for a vibrant, pedestrian- oriented Downtown Core. Without this focus and concentration of retail /service uses, the critical mass of pedestrian - oriented uses will be dissipated to the point that the fundamental premise for the Downtown i.e. a commercial /restaurant area would be lost. Issue All Districts should have the same standards A question was raised concerning the need for 5 districts within the DTSP Each of the 5 Districts proposed in the Downtown have distinctive characteristics and meet different needs, as described in Section IV (Pages 22 -23) of the Plan. The Task Force and Planning Commission felt it was important to identify and enhance these distinct qualities by developing different development and design standards for each District, with common themes that unite each area into a cohesive unit In particular, the 300 -400 blocks of Main Street are seen as the heart and core of the Downtown as the majority of retail sales and service uses are provided in these blocks. The Civic Center, which is the hub for community activities and events, is located within the center of this District and enhances and provides a focal point for the Downtown. The Richmond Street District provides the opportunity to preserve and enhance the historic character of the area. Having the same requirements for all the DTSP area would limit the City's ability to respond to the unique areas of the City. Most of the development requirements i.e height, residential density, FAR, etc. are the same for the entire Downtown area A question was raised concerning the equity of requiring an Administrative Use Permit (AUP) for outdoor gathering areas only in the North Richmond Street District. As currently written, all outdoor gathering and retail areas require an AUP, and outdoor dining, entertainment, dancing and amplified sound are listed as prohibited uses in the North Richmond Street District. In the other districts outdoor gathering, retail and dining is permitted, except uses larger than 200 square feet require an AUP, and outdoor entertainment, dancing and amplified sound require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) The Task Force and Planning Commission recommended this distinction for the North Richmond Street District since there are a significant number of residential unit's (31) that could potentially be impacted by outdoor uses, and currently there are no outdoor dining uses. The Task Force and Planning Commission wanted to focus outdoor dining in the other Districts while still allowing the existing outdoor gathering and retail uses to continue, as permitted by the non - conforming provisions (Page 39 of the Plan.) As written, any expansion of the existing non - conforming outdoor uses, such as Fairytale Parties or Studio Antiques, would require approval of an AUP. In addition to the AUP and /or CUP requirements, dancing requires approval of a business license and a special permit approved by the City Council, and entertainment requires another special business license which includes a Police investigation and approval by the Director of Finance. 3 10 ("] Issue Widening of the sidewalks on Main Street A question came up at the hearing concerning the need to widen the sidewalks and a comment was made that the widened sidewalks would only serve restaurants and not retail businesses. Widening the existing sidewalks from 12 feet to 16 5 feet is seen as a key element in creating an attractive and vibrant pedestrian - oriented environment The current 12 -foot width does not provide the opportunity for outdoor retail displays, dining, sidewalk sales and community events. Many successful downtown's (Brea, Monrovia, Culver City, Palo Alto, and Pasadena) have recognized that these activities are one of the keys to a successful pedestrian - oriented downtown. Attachment 4 shows photographs of a vanety of outdoor retail activities in downtown settings Issue Main Street modifications There was a discussion concerning the phasing of the street improvements The DTSP proposes a 2 phased approach to street modifications on Main Street, with both phases providing a three -lane configuration with a center left -turn lane Phase I would maintain the existing right -of -way and sidewalk widths, and simply re- stripe the 100 -500 blocks. The Public Works Department has provided a revised estimate for these costs, which is shown as redline strikeout text on Pages 92 and 93 As a separate Public Works item on the consent agenda, there is a request for the approval of plans and specifications for the annual slurry seal program, which includes the Phase I re- striping. There would be a cost savings of approximately $21,500 if the Phase I re- striping is done in conjunction with this Public Works project Phase 11 would widen the sidewalks from 12 to 16.5 feet (300 -400 blocks only), to encourage pedestrian activity, and the street trees would be replaced. One tree in the 300 block of Main Street is proposed to be removed in the near future. Staff recommends that this tree not be replaced until the sidewalks are widened and when all the trees are replaced with more appropriate street trees. Planting another tree now would result in more cost by planting it twice, and may harm the tree. A Councilmember discussed the installation of lighting for the trees in Phase 1 prior to the widening of the sidewalks. As currently written, lighting is proposed to be installed at the time the sidewalks are reconstructed. Staff does not recommend that the installation of the lighting be done at a separate time since both involve the tearing up of the sidewalks and streets and may result in additional costs. Issue Angled parking on Main Street Suggestions were made at the hearing to have angled parking on Main Street to increase the amount of on- street parking. The feasibility of angled parking on the 300 and 400 blocks of Main Street was explored by the City's traffic engineer and 4 1 4 staff. Angled parking could be provided on one side of the street within the existing right -of -way, however a center left-turn lane could not be accommodated for the entire length of the blocks. The sidewalks could only be widened approximately 1.5 to 2.5 feet with angled parking on one side, and angled parking on both sides would require narrowing the sidewalks. Approximately 9 additional on- street parking spaces could be accommodated with angled parking on one side of the street With angled parking a center left-turn could not be provided. The Fire, Police, and Recreation and Parks Departments do not recommend angled parking as the elimination of the center left-turn lane could compromise emergency vehicle access, traffic congestion could result, and the asymmetrical streetscape would not be aesthetically pleasing. The proposed Circulation Element analyzed the impacts of the 2 lane and 3 lane configurations. The 2 -lane configuration, without a center left -turn lane, would have significant traffic impacts and the 3 -lane configuration would not The attached concept sketches (Exhibit 5) illustrate the street configuration options that were considered Issue Permitted Heiahts Questions were raised concerning the existing and proposed height limits. The current code allows structures up to 45 feet in height, measured from existing grade to the mid -point of the roof. The proposed standards will only allow 45 feet at the rear of lots, measured to the peak of the roof. The street frontage is limited to 30 feet or 2 stores. Refer to Attachment 6 for an illustration of the proposed reduced heights It was pointed out that the sections referring to 30 feet did not consistently state a maximum of 2 stones The sections refemng to the 30 -foot limit have been revised to add the maximum of 2 stories, in addition to the 30 -foot height The revised redline text (Pages 29, 32, 35, 38 and 41) are attached. Issue Parking The DTSP proposes to allow flexibility in parking standards by providing more opportunities for joint -use, shared, and off -site parking on private and public property, with approval of a parking demand study to ensure that adequate parking is provided. The Plan will continue to allow uses to change from one use to any other permitted use without increasing parking, if existing parking is maintained. The existing 25 -foot wide, 3500 square foot lots are very small, making it difficult to accommodate all required parking on -site A variety of Parking Management Options are proposed to be explored including creating a Visitor Parking Information Guide /Map, proving directional signage, valet parking, angled parking, parking meters, parking lots or a structure, and a shuttle. The City's traffic engineer has indicated that parking structures are the least desirable and least convenient type of parking. In order to manage parking and encourage s 03 ;i customers and employees in the Downtown to use structured parking, on- street parking would need to have parking meters, since it is the most convenient and currently free. Some of the local hotels may have the ability to offer shuttles for their guests to the Downtown. A free lunchtime shuttle system that would serve the Downtown and the employment center east of Sepulveda Boulevard could be provided for approximately $104,600 annually, or $57,800 if only one coach is provided (Attachment 7). Additionally, the traffic engineer recommends conducting a parking demand and land use survey, establishing baseline parking ratios for the Downtown as a whole, monitoring the demand over time and establishing additional parking prior to the parking demand exceeding the supply The DTSP does not propose an increase in the square footage of commercial use over that which is currently allowed, except for one small City owned parcel Issue Main Street designated as a Truck Route There was a question concerning Main Street's designation as a truck route in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Main Street from El Segundo Boulevard to Grand Avenue is designated as a truck route and the section from Grand Avenue to Imperial Highway is not. The only trucks that should be travelling between Grand Avenue and Imperial Highway on Main Street are those that are travelling directly to or from their destination. Truck traffic should not be encouraged or allowed on this section of Main Street. Issue Pursell Alley /Driveway and Plaza The property owner of the Pursell Budding had a concern that he would be required to relinquish parking and /or dedicate a portion of his property for a Plaza The alley /driveway and Plaza are mentioned on Pages 53 and 81 -83 of the Design Standards. The language in these sections encourages and recommends future development of these features, but it does not require that they be developed It is envisioned that if the Pursell building is redeveloped in the future into a mixed -use center with a major anchor tenant, and the Grand Avenue Village (former Ralph's site) is redeveloped, then the Pursell building tenant could take advantage of the Plaza and alley /driveway areas. The property owner would not be required to dedicate the property for public use. Issue Owner occuoancv of residential units The Council inquired about the feasibility of requiring the owner of a second floor residential unit to occupy the unit The City Attorney's office has advised staff that a development standard that would require that the residential unit above a commercial space only be occupied by the commercial business owner would be 6 014 unenforceable. The standards could encourage owner occupancy and incentives could be provided to encourage owner occupancy. Issue The name and potential use of the Village Council pointed out the name used to describe the former Ralph's site, the Village, is confusing since there is already a commercial property called the Village in town Staff has renamed this District as the Grand Avenue Village District If the Council desires another name for the District, it could be changed A statement was made at the public hearing that this site could not be redeveloped with an anchor tenant store The District standards, as currently proposed, allow the flexibility to utilize the existing former Ralph's market budding for an anchor retail/service tenant, smaller retail/service tenants, or a combination of both, with office uses in the rear and above the retail /service A small retail /service building with office uses on the second floor could be accommodated on the corner of the existing site as the first step to help provide a cohesive development on the site and link the Main and Richmond Street Districts. The long -term vision for the site is that the property will be developed with a mixed -use pedestrian- oriented environment created in a village atmosphere, as opposed to a "strip mall" type of development Issue Implementation and financing of improvements The Council requested additional information on the feasibility and cost of a parking structure in the Downtown The Public Works Department staff met with a consultant from International Parking Design, one of the leading firms in parking structure design and construction, to discuss the feasibility of constructing a parking structure in the Downtown. Several different sites and alternative designs were discussed with the consultant and his conclusion was that due to the small amount of land available for the structure, a structure would not be cost effective Based on information published by International Parking Design, staff had originally estimated that a parking structure would cost between $10,000 to $15,000 per stall. However, after reviewing the possible sites, the consultant estimated that each stall would cost $30,000 to $40,000, not including the price of the land, due to site constraints that reduced the potential number of stalls Pages 116 -117 of the Plan have been revised to indicate these changes The Council inquired if CDBG funds could be used for Downtown improvements. Staff has discussed the possibility of using CDBG funds for Downtown improvements with our CDBG consultant who has advised us that the funds can not be used in the Downtown because the City does not qualify based on income CDBG funds may be used for ADA and handicapped access improvements as detailed on Page 140 of the Plan 7 01 5 A preliminary cost estimate summary is included as Attachment 8. The costs shown are the same as the figures provided in the Plan. The cost estimates are very preliminary, as none of the design work has begun P•\P4 nine & Building Safetv\PRO ca'CTS\ OWNTOWN\ CSR 2 doc 010 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 474 (EA -474), AND ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 99 -2 (GPA 99- 2), ZONE CHANGE NO. 99 -2 (ZC 99 -2), AND ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 99 -5 (ZTA 99 -5) FOR THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN, IN THE 100 -500 BLOCKS OF MAIN STREET, THE 100 -300 BLOCKS OF RICHMOND STREET AND THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ON GRAND AVENUE. PETITIONED BY: THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO. WHEREAS, an application was Initiated by the City Council of the City of El Segundo to prepare a Downtown Specific Plan, and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA "), Cal, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et sea The Initial Study demonstrated that the project would not cause any significant environmental Impacts Accordingly, a Mitigated Negative Declaration ( "MND ") was prepared and circulated for public review and comment between April 21, 2000 and May 11, 2000, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the project and supporting evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act, State CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution 3805), and, WHEREAS, on April 27, 2000, May 11, 2000 and May 25, 2000, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to law, duly advertised public hearings on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearings were given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law; and on May 25, 2000 adopted Resolution No 2475, recommending approval of EA No 474, GPA No. 99 -2, ZC No 99 -2, and ZTA No 99 -5, and, WHEREAS, at the duly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of El Segundo on June 20, 2000, a duly advertised public hearing was held on this matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and, WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against the findings of EA No 474, GPA No 99 -24, ZC No 99 -2, and ZTA No 99 -5, and, WHEREAS, at said hearings the following facts were established The Downtown Specific Plan area is located in the northwest quadrant of the City of El Segundo The General Plan land use designation and zoning for the site is Downtown Commercial and Public Facilities ORDINANCE NO APPROVING EA NO 474 6 /5 /00 4 09 PM 01 2 Surrounding land uses in the area are generally residential in nature, one to three stories in height The surrounding area and protect area is a fully developed urban environment 3 The El Segundo High School campus, the Library and Library Park are located north of the Specific Plan area on Main Street To the east and west of the 500 block of Main Street (on Richmond and Standards Streets) is a Two - Family Residential (R -2) Zone, developed mainly with duplexes and two - family dwellings 4 To the west of the balance of the Specific Plan boundary (on Richmond and Concord Streets) is mainly Multi - Family Residential (R -3) zoning, which is developed with small (3 -12 unit) apartment and condominium complexes Further beyond the R -2 and R -3 Zones (on Concord and Virginia Streets) is Single - Family (R -1) Residential zoning and development. 5 To the west of the Specific Plan area there are also a few parcels zoned Downtown Commercial (C -RS), and Neighborhood Commercial (C -2) on Grand Avenue, and Parking (P) on El Segundo Boulevard The development on these sites is also consistent with the zoning, and includes one to two story, low- density (0.5 to 1.0 floor area ratio) commercial construction, and a surface parking lot 6 To the east of the 400 block of Main Street is a Two - Family Residential (R -2) Zone on Standard Street, again developed consistent with the zoning designation 7 To the east of the 300 block of Main Street is largely Multi - Family Residential (R- 3), developed similarly to the areas to the west of the Specific Plan boundary Additionally, there are a few parcels zoned and developed as Parking (P), on Standard Street, and Downtown Commercial (C -RS), on Grand Avenue, similar to the west of the Plan area 8 To the east side of the 200 block of Main Street, on Standard Street, is an area that is also zoned and developed as Downtown Commercial (C -RS), again with similar commercial uses and densities 9 To the east of the 100 block of Main Street, on Standard Street, is a small industrial zone within the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan area with a zoning designation of Small Business (SB) The land uses in this area (light industrial, warehousing etc ) are consistent with the zoning South of El Segundo Boulevard is the Chevron Refinery, which is zoned Heavy Industrial (M -2), consistent with the land use 10 The majority of the 100 block of the east side of Richmond Street is a surface parking lot for the Chevron Refinery immediately to the south Smaller Chevron parking lots also occupy the west side of Richmond and the 100 block of Main Street There are four small City owned surface parking lots with a total of approximately 115 parking spaces, which are open and free to the public, within and immediately adjacent to the Plan area 2 ORDINANCE NO _ APPROVING EA NO 474 6/5100 2 20 PM 11 Plant species present are those that are commonly used for landscaping purposes or which have adapted to urban environments There is no known rare or endangered animal species associated with the Protect site, or protect locale NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that after considering the above facts, the testimony presented at the public hearings, and the facts and study of proposed EA No 474, GPA No 99 -2, ZC No 99 -2, and. ZTA No 99 -5, the City Council makes the following findings ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT That the City of El Segundo has prepared an Initial Study and, an accompanying Mitigated Negative Declaration which was made available to all local and affected agencies and for public review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law The Initial Study concluded that the proposed protect will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) That when considering the whole record, there is no evidence that the project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends, because the project is in -fill development in a built -out urban environment 3 That the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Director of Community, Economic and Development Services to file with any appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and de minimus finding pursuant to California Assembly BIII (AB) No 3158 and the California Code of Regulations. Within twenty -four hours of this approval by the City Council, the applicant shall submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of $25 00 required by the County of Los Angeles for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of Determination As approved in AB 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA will not be met and no vesting shall occur until this condition is met and the required notices and fees are filed with the County GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY That the proposed use is consistent with the following General Plan goals, policies, programs, and oblectives- A The proposed General Plan Land Use designation for the site, as well as the proposed zoning, is Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) The Downtown Specific Plan designation is compatible with the surrounding residential, and commercial land use designations. B The proposed Downtown Specific Plan designation is designed to allow a maximum floor area (FAR) ratio of 1.0, except for one 17,500 square foot City owned parcel, currently developed as a surface parking lot, which would allow an FAR of 15 Additionally, the residential density is proposed to increase from 1 dwelling unit per 3500 square foot lot to 2 dwelling units per 3500 square foot lot While this would permit a greater amount of development than the existing land use designation, the total build out of the Plan area would be an insignificant increase in density when compared to the total allowed density in the entire City 3 ORDINANCE NO _ APPROVING EA NO 474 6/5/00 2 20 PM 0 , 1) C The proposed project is in conformance with many General Plan goals, policies, and objectives related to Economic Development, Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Conservation and Noise The following Economic Development goal, objective, and policies are consistent with the project. ED 3, ED 3 -1, ED 3 -1 1, ED 3 -1 2, ED 3 -1.3, ED 3-14, and ED 3 -1 5, since the Plan strives to preserve and Improve the business environment, stabilize the economic viability of the Downtown, Improve the appearance of Downtown, Improve vehicular circulation, parking and streetscape and enhance the pedestrian environment while providing the opportunity for a mix of commercial services D Many Land Use goals, policies and objectives are consistent with the project Including LU 1, LU 1-4, LU 1 -5, LU 1 -5 1, LU 1 -5.2, LU 1 -5 3, LU 1 -5 4, LU 1 -5 5, LU 1 -56, LU 1 -59, LU 2, LU 2 -1, LU 2 -1 1, LU 2 -2, LU2 -21, LU2 -21A, LU 2- 2 1 B, LU 4, LU 4 -2, LU 4 -21, LU 4 -2 2, LU 4 -2 3, LU 4 -2 4, LU4 -2.5, LU 4 -2 5A, LU 4 -2 6, LU 4 -2 7, LU 4 -2 8, LU 4 -2.9, LU 7, LU 7 -1, LU 7 -1 3, LU7 -2, and LU7- 2 5 The Plan is consistent with the Land Use Element since, one of the Plan's goals is to maintain the "small town" atmosphere. The Plan also strives to preserve the Downtown's historic areas, create a sense of place, provide for citizen input through the Downtown Task Force, and Planning Commission and City Council public hearings, provide sign regulations, encourage street trees, landscaping, and entry statements, provide CEQA review and prohibit drive4hru restaurants The Plan also encourages preservation and enhancement of the Downtown's cultural and historical resources, in that the Implementation and Design Standards sections of the Plan propose the establishment of Historic Preservation criteria for the 100 and 200 blocks of Richmond Street, with incentives and disincentives to encourage the preservation and enhancement of the historical buildings in this area The Specific Plan provides the opportunity to enhance and further stabilize the existing Downtown tax base within a mixed -use environment The Plan strives to create Downtown as the focal point of the community, enhancing the aesthetic environment and upgrading public spaces for Downtown activities The Plan addresses provisions for adequate parking, low - scale, pedestrian- onented architecture and evaluation and mitigation of traffic impacts Lastly, the Plan provides for quality infrastructure in that improved sidewalks, streets, street lighting, and other streetscape infrastructure improvements are proposed E Circulation Element goals, policies and objectives also are consistent with the proposal Including, C 1, C 1 -1, C1 -1.6, C1 -1 8, C1 -1 14, C1 -2, C1 -2 1, C 2, C 2- 1, C 2-16, C2 -1.7, C 2 -2, C 2 -2.1,C 2 -3, C 2 -3 1, C 2 -3.2, C 2 -3.4, C 3, C 3 -1, C 3 -1 1, C 3 -1.3, C 3 -1 7, C 3 -2, C 3 -2.1, C 3 -2.2, C 4 -3, and C 4 -3 1, in that the circulation system in the Downtown area is safe, convenient and cost effective. The three -lane proposal on Main Street has been evaluated and can accommodate the circulation needs with minor Intersection Improvements and the circulation system will continue to provide emergency vehicle access. The Plan provides a pedestrian - onented environment, which is consistent with the General Plan provisions for alternative modes of transportation The widened and enhanced sidewalks will further enhance pedestrian activity The Plan continues to provide bicycle and transit system access, consistent with the General Plan, while encouraging more bicycle parking facilities The Plan also addresses 4 ORDINANCE NO _ APPROVING EA NO 474 6/5100 2 20 PM 02, development of circulation policies that are consistent with other City policies This section of the Specific Plan clearly indicates the Consistency of the Plan with all of the applicable Elements (Economic Development, Land Use, Circulation, Conservation, and Noise) The Plan provides for the upgrading of streets to maintain the level of service, transit planning is addressed, pedestrian and bicycle access is enhanced, parking is managed and potential funding sources are identified The goals, policies, programs, and objectives which the proposed project are consistent with are contained within the Housing Element Including, H 4, H 4 -1, and H4 -1 1 The Specific Plan is consistent with the Housing Element in that residential uses will continue to be permitted, and Increased densities will be allowed, providing the opportunity for a diversity of housing types, prices and tenure G The goal and policies which the proposed project is consistent with are contained within the Conservation Element, CN 5, CN 5 -1, and CN 5 -2 The Downtown Specific Plan is consistent with the urban landscape provisions of the Conservation Element The Plan protects and enhances the quality of the urban landscape of the Downtown, particularly the characteristics and qualities identified by the community, through the Task Force, as being valued H The final goal, objective, policy and program which the project is consistent with relates to the Noise Element including, N 1, N 1 -2, and N 1 -2.1A The Downtown Specific Plan is consistent with the applicable Noise Element in that the Plan requires that the current noise regulations of the Municipal Code be adhered to which address and mitigate any potential noise conflicts NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the City Council hereby adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approves EA No 474, GPA No 99 -2, ZC No. 99 -2, and ZTA No 99 -5, and adopts changes to the El Segundo Municipal Code as follows. SECTION 1. Section 20 16 020 of Chapter 20 16, Title 20, of the EI Segundo Municipal Code Is amended to read as follows 20 16 020 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONES In order to classify, regulate, restrict and segregate the uses of lands and buildings, to regulate and restrict the height and bulk of buildings, to regulate the area of yards and other open spaces about buildings and to regulate the density of population, the City has adopted the following specific plan areas which function as the Zoning Code for specific areas Smoky Hollow Specific Plan There are four (4) classes of use zones Intended to be used within the boundaries of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan These zones include 5 ORDINANCE NO _ 615/00 APPROVING .20 PM NO 474 021 GAC - Grand Avenue Commercial Zone MDR - Medium Density Residential Zone SB - Small Business Zone. MM - Medium Manufacturing Zone 2 1241" Street Specific Plan There is one (1) zone intended to be used within the boundaries of the 124"' Street Specific Plan This zone is 124' Street SP 124`" Street Specific Plan 3 Aviation Specific Plan There is one (1) use zone intended to be used within the boundaries of the Aviation Specific Plan This zone is ASP - Aviation Specific Plan Zone Downtown Specific Plan There are five (5) classes of use districts intended to be used with the boundaries of the Downtown Specific Plan These districts include MSD Main Street District MSTD Main Street Transitional District RSD Richmond Street District NRSD North Richmond Street District V The Village The foregoing Zones are separate Zones and shall not be deemed to be more restrictive or less restrictive than any other Zone, but shall be limited to the uses permitted in the specified Zone. SECTION 2 The Downtown Specific Plan is hereby adopted as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference SECTION 3. The Land Use designations (Commercial and Public Use designations) and the proposed Land Use Plan (northwest quadrant) of the Land Use Element are hereby amended to reflect the change of a portion of the 100 -500 blocks of Main Street, the 100 -300 blocks of Richmond Street and the adjacent properties on the 100 -200 blocks of west Grand Avenue from Downtown Commercial and Public Facilities to Downtown Specific Plan The corresponding changes to the Land Use Element as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are also hereby approved SECTION 4. The 1992 General Plan Summary of Existing Trends Buildout (Exhibit LU- 3) of the Land Use Element is hereby amended to reflect the change of the 100 -500 blocks of Main Street, the 100 -300 blocks of Richmond Street and the adjacent properties on the 100 -200 blocks of west Grand Avenue from Downtown Commercial and Public Facilities designations to Downtown Specific Plan. The corresponding changes to the Land Use Element as set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are also hereby approved SECTION 5. The General Plan Land Use Map is hereby changed to reflect the change for the 100 -500 blocks of Main Street, the 100 -300 blocks of Richmond Street and the adjacent 6 ORDINANCE NO APPROVING EA NO 474 6/5100 2 20 PM 022 properties in the 100 -200 blocks of west Grand Avenue from Downtown Commercial and Public Facilities designations to Downtown Specific Plan The corresponding changes to the Land Use Map as set forth in Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are also hereby approved SECTION 6. The current Zoning Map is hereby amended to reflect a change for the 100- 500 blocks of Main Street, the 100 -300 blocks of Richmond Street and the adjacent properties on the 100 -200 blocks of west Grand Avenue from Downtown Commercial and Public Facilities designations to Downtown Specific Plan The corresponding changes to the Zoning Map as set forth in Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are also hereby approved SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall become effective at midnight on the thirtieth (30) day from and after the final passage and adoption hereof SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a note of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted, and, shall within 15 days after the passage or adoption thereof cause the same to be published or posted in accordance with the law 7 ORDINANCE NO APPROVING EA NO 474 023 6/5/00 2.20 PM PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2000. Mike Gordon, Mayor ATTEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Ordinance No _ was duly introduced by said City Council at a regular meeting held on the day Of , 2000, and was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of , 2000, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM c ems^-- - rk D H ffiF i y ttorney ORDINANCE NO APPROVING EA NO 474 02.1 6/22/00 11 30 AM CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "A' COPY AVAILABLE IN CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 025 3 Land Use Element CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE -NO. EXHIBIT B acre All lots to be developed as multi - family residential must be a minimum of 2.5 acres in size or one complete block, whichever is greater However, existing lots less than 2.5 acres in size, which are totally surrounded by other land use designations and confined by existing streets shall be allowed to develop as multi- family residential without a variance from the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan Urban Mixed -Use North Permits a mixture of office, research and development, retail, and hotel uses Light industrial uses conducted within a fully enclosed building shall be permitted if approved with a discretionary application The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is limited to 13 (Ord. 1272, GPA 97- 1, 6/17/97) Urban Mixed -Use South Permits a mixture of office, research and development, retail, and hotel uses. Light industrial uses conducted within a fully enclosed building and adult- onented businesses shall be permitted if approved with a discretionary application. The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is limited to 1.3 (Ord 1272, GPA 97 -1, 6/17/97) Parking Permits areas for parking automobiles, motorcycles, and bicycles in surface or structured parking Specific properties have been designated as parking to insure that adequate long -term parking space will be available. 124th Street Specific Plan Permits warehousing and mini-storage uses (with an appurtenant custodial convenience unit) Also permits a Water Facility The maximum FAR is 0 47.1 (with the Water Facility) and 0 54 1 (without the Water Facility) (Ord. 1309, GPA 99 -1, 8/17/99) Aviation Specific Plan Permits warehouse "mini- storage" and storage uses with limited ancillary and support uses. The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is limited to 0.22 (Ord 1314, GPA 97 -4, 12/7/99) ..... ......... - ..... - -- - °- . - -' T H E C I T Y OF EL S E G U N D O 0 G E N E R A L P L A N 3 -8 026 3 Land Use Element CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE -NO. EXHIBIT B Industrial Designations Light industrial Permits light manufacturing, warehousing, research and development, and office Light manufacturing is defined as the assembly, packaging, fabrication, and processing of materials into finished products. rather than the conversion or extraction of raw materials. The light industrial activity shall be conducted primarily within structures. outside storage areas and assembly activity should be limited The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) allowed is 0 6 Other compatible uses and additional FAR may be permitted for individual projects by the approval of a Specific Plan with supplemental environmental analysts Alternative methods of calculating FAR may be permitted, subject to the provisions in the Zoning Code (Ord 1249, GPA 96 -1, 4!2196) Heavy Industrial Permits heavy manufacturing uses such as construction yards, factories, generating stations, extraction of raw materials, and refining All uses must conform to the policies of the Hazardous Materials Element The maximum allowed floor area ratio (FAR) is 0.6. Institutional Public Facilities Designations Permits publicly owned facilities such as schools, maintenance yards, utilities, the Gym Genter, and the Library. The Civic Center is included m the Downtown Snecific Plan area. Federal Government Permits a U.S Government facility that is consistent with sur- rounding uses. Open Space open space Designations Permits passive or active use of areas preserved as useable or visual open space both publicly- and privately -owned These areas include the El Segundo Blue Butterfly preserve, utility easements, and the existing flood control sumps Parks Permits passive or active use of areas developed as parks, for community and recreational uses Designated park areas are publicly - owned Proposed Land Use Plan The following is a discussion of the 1992 Land Use Plan, which T H E C ! T Y OF EL S E G U N D O • G E N E R A L P L A N i -9 027 3 Land Use Element (Applicable excerpts) CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT B discretionary application. The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is limited to 13 (Ord. 1272, GPA 97 -1, 6/17/97) Parking Permits areas for parking automobiles, motorcycles, and bicycles in surface or structured parking Specific properties have been designated as parking to insure that adequate long -term parking space will be available 124th Street Specific Pion Permits warehousing and mini- storage uses (with an appurtenant custodial convenience unit) Also permits a Water Facility The maximum FAR is 0.47.1 (with the Water Facility) and 0.54.1 (without the Water Facility) (Ord 1309, GPA 99 -1, 8/17/99) Aviation Specific Plan Permits warehouse "mim- storage" and storage uses with limited ancillary and support uses. The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is limited to 0.22 (Ord 1314, GPA 97 -4, 12/7/99) ow ..1 Snecifir Plan 111 1 . uses rr_aDe&1w . 1 • 1-11 - • X11 • 1 .11 '11 Also uicWdes the AMMMIll" WA Industrial Designations Light Industrial Permits light manufacturing, warehousing, research and development, and office Light manufacturing is defined as the assembly, packaging, fabrication, and processing of materials into finished products, rather than the conversion or extraction of raw materials. The light industrial activity shall be conducted primarily within structures; outside storage areas and assembly activity should be limited. The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) allowed is 0.6 Other compatible uses and additional FAR may be permitted for individual projects by the approval of a Specific Plan with supplemental environmental analysis. Alternative methods of calculating FAR may be permitted, subject to the provisions in the Zoning Code (Ord. 1249, GPA 96 -1, 412/96). Heavy Industrial Pemuts heavy manufacturing uses such as construction yards, factories, generating stations, extraction of raw materials, and refining All uses must conform to the policies of the Hazardous Materials Element. The maximum allowed floor area ratio (FAR) is 0 6. T H E C I T Y OF EL S E G N D O • G E N E R A L P L A N 3 -8 AM 3 Land Use Element (Applicable excerpts) CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT B Institutional Public Facilities Designations Permits Publicly owned facilities such as schools, maintenance yards, utilities, the G . e Center-, and the Lib :Ebb, Cim Center is Lncluded tom'• -- - - in the Downtown Specific Plan area Federal Government Permits a U.S Government facility that is consistent with sur- rounding uses. Open Space open Space Designations Permits passive or active use of areas preserved as useable or visual open space both publicly- and privately -owned These areas include the El Segundo Blue Butterfly preserve, utility easements, and the existing flood control sumps. Parks Permits passive or active use of areas developed as parks, for community and recreational uses. Designated park areas are publicly - owned. Proposed Land Use Plan The following is a discussion of the 1992 Land Use Plan, which indicates future land uses for the entire City For ease of discussion, the City is divided into four quadrants and the proposed land use designations within that quadrant are discussed. To know what is allowed under each designation, please reference the land use definitions listed above Northwest Quadrant The northwest quadrant of the City has the most vaned mix of uses within the City All of the City's residential units, the Downtown area, the Civic Center, and the older industrial area of Smoky Hollow, are located in this quadrant. The 1992 Plan retains the three residential designations found on the old Plan: single - family, two- family, and multi - family, plus a new designation of Planned Residential Development The Plan shows 357.2 acres of single- family, 57 4 acres of two- family, 119.3 acres of multi - family and 5 7 acres of planned residential development. This includes the re- designation of Imperial Avenue School, which is no longer used for educational purposes, from Public Facility to Planned Residential Development. The total number of dwelling units projected by the Plan is 7,674. One of the mayor goals of the 1992 Plan is to preserve the residential neighborhoods (Ord. 1209, GPA 93 -1, 11/2/93, Ord. 1244, 2/6/96; Ord, 1272, GPA 97 -1, T H E C I T Y OF EL S E G U N D O • G E N E R A L P L A N 3.9 029 3 Land Use Element (Applicable excerpts) CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT B 6/17/97, Ord 1279, 10/7/97). The Smoky Hollow area, which houses many of the City's older industrial uses, has been designated Smoky Hollow Mixed -Use, in recognition of the existing Smoky Hollow Specific Plan The Specific Plan allows a combination of industrial, retail, office, and residential uses The Smoky Hollow area is approximately 92.2 acres (Ord 1272, GPA 97 -1, 6/17/97, Ord 1279, 10/7/91). The 39 8 sere Downtown area is designated as Downtown Commercial (8.8 acres) and Downtown Specific Plan (25.8 acres), where existing uses are already of a community- serving nature There are also 7.1 acres designated for Neighborhood Commercial uses along Grand and Imperil Avenues and at Manposa and Center Streets These have been designated only where there are existing neighborhood - serving commercial uses (Ord 1279,10/7/97) The public schools, private schools, Qvie Center, Library, and other public uses are all shown as Public Facilities. ThC Civic Center rs included m the Downtown Specific Plan area In addition, each of the existing public parks are designated as such. The open space areas under utility transmission corridors and the preserve for the Blue Butterfly are designated as Open Space The areas designated for parking on the Plan include public- and privately -owned lots which are necessary to serve existing businesses and the Downtown area The southwest comer of Sepulveda Boulevard and imperial Avenue is designated Corporate Office (17.8 ac) allowing a mix of office uses, similar to what exists there now, with retail in the lobby. There are General Commercial uses indicated along Sepulveda Boulevard, where there are existing commercial uses including the Hacienda Hotel There is also one General Commercial area along Imperial Avenue, where the Crown Sterling Suites Hotel now exists. Southwest Quadrant The Southwest Quadrant has only three designations- heavy industrial, parking, and open space. The heavy industrial area covers the entire Chevron Refinery, as well as the Southern California Edison Generating Station. These uses total 958 acres The parking designation is an existing surface lot in the southwest T H E C I T Y OF EL S E G U N D O * G E N E R A L P L A N 3 -10 030 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT C 1992 General Plan Summary of Existing Trends Buildout Land Use Category Acres Dwelling Units Square Footage Single - Family Residential 357.2 2,858 -- Two- Family Residential 57.4 934 - -- Planned Residential 57 65 — Multi-Family Residential 1197 3,389 --- Neighborhood Commercial 7-1 85 1 100,000 Downtown Commercial 8.8 18 383,328 General Commercial 443 - -- 1,930,000 Corporate Office 211.2 - -- 12,351,000 Smoky Hollow 94 1 268 2,019,454 Urban Mixed -Use North 2790 - -- 15.799,212 Urban Mixed -Use South 70.6 3,997,936 124th Street Specific Plan 3.9 1 73,530 Aviation Specific Plan 5.4 — 66,000 Downtown Specific Plan 25.8 552 1,123,848 Parking 118 - -- - -- Light Industnal 356 1 - -- 18,529,000 Heavy Industrial 1,0868 — - -- 2 Public Facilities 879 - -- - -- Federal Government 906 - -- - -- Open Space 783 — Parks 50.0 - -- -- Street & Railroad R.O W 442.6 - -- - -- Totals 3,494.3 8,170 56,373,308 Population Projection 7 18,345 1 Existing construction and recently constructed renovated commercial centers and legal noMonlenning residential uses at densities that are currently higher Iran allowed by this land use desgnations m this plan will not neahstiWy be 00nvaned to m xad dCmmalCat/raSldenUei ,ones and theee bAld"S ant expected to remain for the Me of the Plan 2 The heavy abustnal shovm on this plan includes the Chevron Refinery, Southem Ceidomta Edison Generation Station Ax Producis and Allied Chernrul fetlWas These fenabes have process" equipment and tanks rather than buildings and are expected to remain for the We of the Plan Therefore, no esamale0 building square footage is shown Swrt a City of EI Segundo Planning Department and The l4ghttoot Planning Group Amendmants Ord 1209 GPA 93.1, 1IM3 Ord 1266 GPA 95-1, 216196 Ord 1272 GPA 97 -1 6117197 Ord 1279 GPA 97-2 10M97 Ord 1309 GPA 89-1 8117/99 Ord 1314 GPA 97 -3 1217/99 Ord _ GPA 99.2 XXIM2000 I CITY OF EL SEGUNDO a GENERAL PLAN I 1992 General Plan exthtdt Summary of Existing Trends Buildout LU -3 031 City Council Ordinance _No. Exhibit D - MARIPOSA AVE PINE AVE Downtown Commercial and Public Faciltles to Downtown Specific Plan HOLLY AVE f j GRAND AVE FRANKLIN AVE N� F EL SEGUNDO BLVD General Plan Amendment Map Q Specific Plan Boundary 500 1000 Feet h E 03 s City Council Ordinance No. Exhibit E- - C -RS and PF Zones to DSP ELI MARIPOSA AVE PINE AVE HOLLY AVE L� EL SEGUNDO BLVD Zone Change Map Q Specific Plan Boundary 1000 Feet W 1 C 0 h W E 033 5 N 044 co ^ N . _ >11 CD 0 v ` U L° m LL ; N E m d) U m m C LL 0 a c C d N W O U m 036 N LL! O L k��co _V O O >y m a) ) F96 0 ML� covo0 -M cETrQ� a�a�o D y L 0 Z a a LL C J U N N a) CSr'fn — W W �L O y Em3c `Q'ZO yca cx U .coMao�N00 UCL NE ccn_ = E p CDcnUUF5LLati =_X z wa p m �'�co`gcoc000 °v��oL000 ~ N C (D tp cA cri LO U) >0 o o C% .c o 4) c aZ " U) M m 0 � W U C cn � 7 N ca Z �OM00r�00 L N Em:]C = yotj cc CDcn0UmLL LL 220� p_ CD CD Q_'a. .0 Cn �NM�� co Lq00000 a L Z N Z , -IW „�.4 � L..� �� my E� = Nca N AM Me -000 o� m� ii! ' m `- E CL �' CD o v O O LO 0 CO 0 o C �� U) �NM--i� Co co a n �C o t Z •�-�� t my 2P�Z0 a) = cx0 M04 00� 10 U) N c CO _ ] � E M LL LL M CD � d 4) L - caWn00000 M--ci O a N 1 CO N a y O L Z �(D � 2 Z, °+W t� mY N m = yCij x c0 MN 00, rfn 0a (D mLaLL ==of = E FF++ x O LO v _ O O 0 0 ON 0) altoO ci to U M U y c O M M M I� M 0 M r M U tC0 I D CD Q N N ccc y c l 9 CV) w M Y �i QnfOmrr >m N E m d) U m m C LL 0 a c C d N W O U m 036 N C a c m W U U 3 0 co ., rn c ^ Cl) o O = d' m j v O fA a c r_ C13 Q 0) Cl) 0 (�C V N LL = U (06 !�•yJj J O y O J C C a L fn m ` m C O c Q' L d, > = N cn VJ O .0 fn t I- O "O d N t0 Q f4 O` C O U m U .+ r c m N N w 0 w c 7 a a) O ` m E�� m• mLL m M m y mU = O ocn m _r• m a� c .m d U J� w c w m 0 a= 3 m N L y 0 c m c m a) c a7 L 0> U ma v m co ma a) L w O L m E U a) L In -fnJ Z �i-�HIt 2LLLH UInF- > F WCn_ > H Q to o C/) a m _ a - O) c >, c O �� m O c E �� f) y 3 m ... M O A f..7D Q Ql a O �• p U m N m L '_V.' O N U 6 11+1 m J to J = Ui 7 U 01 c .0 a � (n t O LL O N n1 m¢ (6 y N C 7 c`a �? ..+ O w m N N m `� O D. cam~ 7 a 0 o 2 m O LLN °� E —.56 C cc m�U U' o -' a°'i c LL o _-'' - 3 a) fn fn c c a) 0 0 i, fn 'v fn Z' Cl) m� M fA 0 m U a� Cl) In SfnJ m O,= =���F y C_ W a m =LL m L F- W fn m i F- c a ¢ L H L w0.9 E U > r N Cl) a N y Y T U O L j, a cn N W pp Y N m m 7 O' O � m U � y O J cA " L O V" O a) Qt co O J .m. J O) L�fA `U N �fn Q'� ca N •� m = "-O-' fn O y L U 7 m a ~ N N¢ O ca O a �O j = •n •y m N m cn a cm �a y 0 C. 7 N :m.. ? = -�oa ?fn� 3 ��fn , c c ° 2 0 5ico10tn �fn fn O m �Un E x U) c w m O a = = y 3 �_w w_ a 6-1 m 2LLF m t— -c9LU 7 U m a c a ¢ m a 2 L F- L wcn_ E Ci > �- O ^ a W M T Oa ^ a U o Hn �� m m o` c E m N o J tr ` E O O m J C fn O a) D cc w N m C1 Nm J J O 4) c L a �%L fn .�, a m fn 'D fn � 'O d "4 N m Q m (6 O j m .V-+ L a (�6 N N m O d N LO a) W WE d O N m E a) N N O) = N O 7 y U � (n p, d J t/2 ca T cn= 3 d cto a) m c w r o m $-- 0 >cn�fn T Zcn m y fn Owcnc7 mcn =C5 -i � �Wa =LL i— uicn <7- wcn > �a H W U) c-, m c T o c m a � w E o c E o m � r o m F UO r m O' p� to ci �' m J a. a) lq 'V LL N mJ a)� 0 -1 c a °� m _ -• O �fn� m o �a Fa ya c V"m.d? � >a. m y O. � cn �` = � 04 D.. .�. O N E >0 a) N � _ � m O 7 y V C � -A � N OI d N N c � 7 "O d ?` m- > a) 3 N d d m m @ m 0 c U N N N fn a) fn O L fn fn N N J y to �i Cn �fn-i m O �� �wa2L�F fc6 cc6 .`c -U' 2 W lOC >F-a N Qa�a H�w��a wUa F-a FTi OOOO O 00 DO 000 OOO 0 N 0 0 P- O O iii N CA O aD N a0 h N n 0 0 co ao N Ln e� 0 CV M 1-cr 0 n 0 (M 0 Lq In 0000 O O 00 0� Ci •--e- h r m .- r N C) V' �C) cli A� r a'�� VN' 7 V 36 C a c m W U U 3 0 co °o 0 N N c i Z m m c m U d' C 0 N 0 d N C U J H N d c N m c m r O d 0 U C N C lL 1 M W 0 U U 0 ) N O CV O�C r P P H r U G m n 0 Z Lv Z. W E 0—,Of U) 0 „ td s NO o o W° o E 10 C D o�� ) f° c L E yO w -� cU 0 o � m> p aU " m� a) W N NEE @"� c m .. N X10 C c.d: p C%��CO CO r N NO (� L o E N t Uw0 W M N m o°? N f0 v�wUU� v m LL OU :° cU °LL O �UX> 0) 0C cn2LO) m U x t J W N O O M O _ cc T 1 °U y O O a V $� rr A 17 N1 W a 7 �� a C`y Q�1 m C N n`o_ _ )> O C C o U N a ,1��E WO �� ca �m� cd.: W - w rnE W O a,,, f0 W E LL m W �- C fC U a. CO �Y .- .,.. °-' E Q7 p 00 C C .: ... (�LO r co CC)r NrO CO E m U) U) o cc2ii°in �> U- U�Y 0C5cA2UU x W ^ � O co OO_ 00 cn E O m co pj°M OO W Y N CD CD U W W a o co g E °o a p rrO�N a Q� m �o `W d w S E° -- C7 o c i-' co g ca vo++ LL C >` C 7 to W' _ W` Cn U E W a Cn a) C 0O tDrN00 t4 � W o N ��O °fn �� =O LL N d U�� p` 0(D(n2UU ID 0 x u) E W O r C y 0 �� m k+MCOm�MOO �U O WN Vi ���NetN 0► W W o a o = o o �^ =a c� W t� a � a= E � 0 m �� m � m� a 0 E =��� � a W c d� W y W O c >. W LL c> O. c� �.W. O CD W .W-. �OCDrNOO C.0 (nw o �20 °cn Em LL U�U flc9cniUU W n 0 U N N co co CO N O O 7 R (7 0 ° R (A (6LO OOMOP a ca0 r C . U O N _ U W a m c O E cn �`�a'� E a) " -� E LL > « N W �n�rNOo n oo nc O in ° U 0CCXcoY in UU f*w o v It M M O a00o O O M co 000 iV) cM OaaN r W d 0 O> CO 1� 7 OO V m O r MV' O CA a v a Co O U') h m° CO Q VM' It v� V N M N U 0W) C w Y x x 0 WCOM W >m °o 0 N N c i Z m m c m U d' C 0 N 0 d N C U J H N d c N m c m r O d 0 U C N C lL 1 M W 0 U U 0 ) c Height New structures abutting a street must be a minimum of 25 feet in height, and may not exceed 30 feet and two stones in height, as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below This height shall be measured at the front and streetside property lines Structures shall not exceed 45 feet, or three stories, in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below i) Upsloping lots - For lots that slope up from the street, the 45 -foot height limit shall be measured vertically from the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines to the peak or the highest point of the structure Additionally, the structure may not exceed 30 feet in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines n) Downslopmg lots — For lots that slope down from the street, the 45 -foot height limit shall be measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below Additionally, the structure may not exceed 30 feet in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines d Setbacks i) Front and Streetside — There shall be no setback between a budding and the front and streetside property lines on the street level, except pedestnan- onented plazas or architectural features, up to 10 feet in depth, may be placed between the building and the street, subject to design review Parking is not allowed between the street and the budding, except for handicapped parking, subject to design review u) Side and Rear - Zero setback allowed e Lot Width A minimum of 25 feet is required for new lots. f Budding Area - (Density) i) Commercial -The total net floor area of all buildings, excluding residential floor area, shall not exceed the total net square footage of the property, or a Floor Area Ratio, FAR, of 1 0.1 n) Residential- The maximum residential density shall not exceed two dwelling units per 3,500 square foot lot, or one unit per 1,750 square feet of lot area. A fraction of a lot greater than 1,173 square feet will allow an additional unit g Residential Size A minimum of 450 square feet of net floor area shall be provided for each dwelling unit h Walls and Fences: All provisions of Chapter 20.12, General Provisions, of the El Segundo Municipal Code must be met i Access Safe and convenient pedestrian access shall be provided between buildings and sidewalks, or modes of transportation, and between buildings for multi - budding projects Landscaping, All provisions of Section 20 12.170, Landscaping, of the El Segundo Municipal Code and Section VIII, Design Standards, must be met. k Parking and Loading All provisions of Section VII, Parking must be met I Signs All provisions of Section VIII, Design Standards must be met City of El Segundo 29 Draft July 18, 2000 Downtown Specific Plan 038 iv) All provisions of Chapter 20.12, General Provisions, of the El Segundo Municipal Code must be met v) All provisions of Section VIII, Design Standards must be met b Lot Area A minimum of 3,500 square feet is required for new lots. c Height New structures abutting a street may not exceed 30 feet and two stories in height, as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below This height shall be measured at the front and streetside property lines Structures shall not exceed 45 feet, or three stones, in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below i) Upsloping lots - For lots that slope up from the street, the 45 -foot height limit shall be measured vertically from the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines to the peak or the highest point of the structure Additionally, the structure may not exceed 30 feet In height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines u) Downsloping lots — For lots that slope down from the street, the 45 -foot height limit shall be measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below Additionally, the structure may not exceed 30 feet in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines d Setbacks i) Front and Streetslde — There shall be no setback between a budding and the front and streetside property lines on the street level, except pedestrian - oriented plazas or architectural features, up to 10 feet in depth, may be placed between the budding and the street, subject to design review. Parking is not allowed between the street and the budding, except for handicapped parking subject to design review. u) Side and Rear - Zero setback allowed e Lot Width A minimum of 25 feet is required for new lots. f Budding Area - (Density) i) Commercial -The total net floor area of all buildings, excluding residential floor area, shall not exceed the total net square footage of the property, or a Floor Area Ratio, FAR, of 101 u) Residential - The maximum residential density shall not exceed two dwelling units per 3,500 square foot lot, or one unit per 1,750 square feet of lot area A fraction of a lot greater than 1,173 square feet will allow an additional unit. g Residential Size A minimum of 450 square feet of net floor area shall be provided for each dwelling unit h. Walls and Fences. All provisions of Chapter 20 12, General Provisions, of the El Segundo Municipal Code must be met i Access Safe and convenient pedestrian access shall be provided between buildings and sidewalks, or modes of transportation, and between buildings for multi - building projects j Landscaping All provisions of Section 20 12 170, Landscaping, of the Ei Segundo Municipal Code and Section VIII, Design Standards, must be met. k Parking and Loading All provisions of Section VII, Parking must be met City of EI Segundo 32 Draft July 18, 2000 Downtown Specific Plan 039 iv) All provisions of Chapter 2012, General Provisions, of the El Segundo Municipal Code must be met v) All provisions of Section Vlll, Design Standards must be met b Lot Area A minimum of 3,500 square feet is required for new lots c Height New structures abutting a street may not exceed 30 feet and two stories in height, as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below This height shall be measured at the front and streetside property lines Structures shall not exceed 45 feet, or three stories, in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below i) Upsloping lots - For lots that slope up from the street, the 45 foot height limit shall be measured vertically from the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines to the peak or the highest point of the structure Additionally, the structure may not exceed 30 feet in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines ii) Downsloping lots — For lots that slope down from the street, the 45 -foot height limit shall be measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below Additionally, the structure may not exceed 30 feet in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines d Setbacks i) Front and Streetside — There shall be no setback between a building and the front and streetside property lines on the street level, except pedestnan - onented plazas or architectural features, up to 10 feet in depth, may be placed between the building and the street, subject to design review Parking is not allowed between the street and the budding, except for handicapped parking subject to design review ii) Side and Rear - Zero setback allowed e Lot Width A minimum of 25 feet is required for new lots f Building Area (Density) i) Commercial -The total net floor area of all buildings, excluding residential floor area, shall not exceed the total net square footage of the property, or a Floor Area Ratio, FAR, of 10 1, except as provided in Section 9, Strategic Sites ii) Residential - The maximum residential density shall not exceed two dwelling units per 3,500 square foot lot, or one unit per 1,750 square feet of lot area A fraction of a lot greater than 1,173 square feet will allow an additional unit iii) Live /work - The commercial portion shall be a minimum of 250 square feet or 7% of the area of the lot, whichever is greater g Residential Size. A minimum of 450 square feet of net floor area shall be provided for each dwelling unit, including the "live" portion of a live /work development h Walls and Fences All provisions of Chapter 20 12, General Provisions, of the El Segundo Municipal Code must be met i Access Safe and convenient pedestrian access shall be provided between buildings and sidewalks, or modes of transportation, and between buildings for multi- building protects I Landscaping All provisions of Section 2012 170, Landscaping, of the El Segundo Municipal Code and Section VIII, Design Standards, must be met City of El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan 35 Draft July 18, 2000 0 4 C i) All uses shall be conducted within a fully enclosed budding, except the outdoor uses detailed under Accessory and Administrative Uses, ii) All provisions of Chapter 20 55, Developer Transportation Demand Management (TDM), of the El Segundo Municipal Code must be met. iii) All provisions of Chapter 20 56, Employer /Occupant Transportation Systems Management (TSM), of the El Segundo Municipal Code must be met iv) All provisions of Chapter 20 12, General Provisions, of the El Segundo Municipal Code must be met v) All provisions of Section VIII, Design Standards must be met b Lot Area A minimum of 3,500 square feet is required for new lots c Height New structures abutting a street may not exceed 30 feet and 2 stones in height, as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below This height shall be measured at the front and streetside property lines. Structures shall not exceed 45 feet, or three stories, in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below i) Upsloping lots - For lots that slope up from the street, the 45 -foot height limit shall be measured vertically from the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines to the peak or the highest point of the structure Additionally, the structure may not exceed 30 feet in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines. ii) Downsloping lots — For lots that slope down from the street, the 45 -foot height limit shall be measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below Additionally, the structure may not exceed 30 feet in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines d Setbacks - i) Front and Streetside — There shall be no setback between a building and the front and streetside property lines on the street level, except pedestrian - onented plazas or architectural features, up to 10 feet in depth, may be placed between the building and the street, subject to design review Parking is not allowed between the street and the budding, except for handicapped parking subject to design review ii) Side and Rear - Zero setback allowed e Lot Width - A minimum of 25 feet is required for new lots. f Building Area - (Density) i) Commercial -The total net floor area of all buildings, excluding residential floor area, shall not exceed the total net square footage of the property, or a Floor Area Ratio, FAR, of 1 0.1 u) Residential - The maximum residential density shall not exceed two dwelling units per 3,500 square foot lot, or one unit per 1,750 square feet of lot area A fraction of a lot greater than 1,173 square feet will allow an additional unit g Residential Size. A minimum of 450 square feet of net floor area shall be provided for each dwelling unit h Walls and Fences. All provisions of Chapter 20 12, General Provisions, of the El Segundo Municipal Code must be met i Access Safe and convenient pedestrian access shall be provided between buildings and sidewalks, and modes of transportation, and between buildings for multi - building projects City of El Segundo 38 Draft July 18, 2000 Downtown Specific Plan 041 a Drive -thru restaurants b. Churches c Service stations Site Development Standards - a General Provisions i) All new development shall be subject to design review to ensure consistencies with the Specific Plan, as detailed in Section VIII, Design Standards it) All uses shall be conducted within a fully enclosed budding, except the outdoor uses detailed under Permitted, Accessory, Administrative and Conditional Uses, and Outdoor recreational uses iii) All provisions of Chapter 20 55, Developer Transportation Demand Management (TDM), of the El Segundo Municipal Code must be met iv) All provisions of Chapter 20 56, Employer /Occupant Transportation Systems Management (TSM), of the El Segundo Municipal Code must be met. v) All provisions of Chapter 20 12, General Provisions, of the El Segundo Municipal Code must be met b Lot Area Existing lots under common ownership should be developed under a common cohesive plan, as one parcel, not as each original 25 foot wide lot c Height New structures abutting a street may not exceed 30 feet and two stones in height, as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below This height shall be measured at the front and streetside property lines Structures shall not exceed 45 feet, or three stories, in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below A variety of building heights must be provided throughout the site i) Upsloping lots - For lots that slope up from the street, the 45 -foot height limit shall be measured vertically from the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines to the peak or the highest point of the structure Additionally, the structure may not exceed 30 feet in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines u) Downsloping lots — For lots that slope down from the street, the 45 -foot height limit shall be measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below Additionally, the structure may not exceed 30 feet in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade at the front and streetside property lines iii) Vertical towers or appendages- These structures, if located near the comer of Grand Avenue and the alley and the northwest side of the property abutting Richmond Street, may be 45 feet, or two floors, in height as measured from the peak or the highest point of the roof vertically to the existing grade directly below d Setbacks i) Front and Streetside — There shall be no setback between a building and the front and streetside property lines on the street level, except pedestnan - onented plazas or architectural features, up to 10 feet in depth, may be placed between the building and the street, subject to design review Parking is not allowed between the street and the budding. ii) Side and Rear - Zero setback allowed e Lot Width Existing lots under common ownership should be developed under a common cohesive plan, as one parcel, not as each original 25 -foot wide lot City of El Segundo 41 Draft July 18, 2000 Downtown Specific Plan 042 Sidewalk widening /street narrowing- (300 -400 Blocks Main Street) Currently the sidewalks in the Main Street District are 12 feet in width, with 4 -fool tree wells adjacent to the curb, leaving only 8 feet of sidewalk width in areas where there are trees There are 7 foot wide parallel parking stalls and two 10- foot 6 -inch driving lanes on each side of the street. The total right -of -way width is 80 feet, with a 56 feet of curb to curb width This current configuration leaves little room for outdoor retail activities such as outdoor dining, art displays, and sidewalk sales, or for pedestrians to stroll and enjoy the Downtown. Additionally, the excess street width tends to speed vehicles through the area instead of slowing them down and protecting the pedestrian environment As these two blocks are the core of the Downtown, they are seen as the most critical in creating the desired pedestrian - oriented environment. The proposed modifications would widen the sidewalks to approximately 16 5 feet on each side The existing parallel parking on each side of the street would be retained and two through driving lanes, one in each direction would be provided Additionally, a continuous center left-turn lane is key in order to avoid traffic congestion in the Downtown In addition to the sidewalk widening, new colored stamped concrete decorative sidewalks and mid -block crosswalks or colored textured pavement accents are proposed Approximately 8 -10 on- street parking spaces would be lost with the re- striping due to the dedicated right -turn only lanes at street intersections Narrowing the street would also require reconstruction of the roadway, relocation of streetlights and fire hydrants, the relocation of traffic signals and loop detectors at the Grand and Holly Avenue intersections, and the installation of infrastructure (conduit) to accommodate future installation of modem high speed "bandwidth" and fiber optic cables These modifications are seen as a permanent, Phase II approach, to creating a truly pedestnan - oriented environment in the core of the Downtown A Phase I, short-term improvement plan for the 100 -500 blocks of Main Street is discussed below Estimated Cost:-$776,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund ($160,000 previously approved in 1999/2000 CIP budget, additional funding of $320,000 could be reallocated from Civic Center Plaza budget- see discussion under Section C of Implementation), Gas Tax, Prop C (with MTA approval), BID, and /or other assessment district Street Modifications- (100 -500 Blocks Main Street) As a Phase I approach, the existing roadway from El Segundo Boulevard to Manposa Avenue, with the existing 56 foot curb to curb width, could be re- striped The re- striping could accommodate the same roadway configuration, as the Phase II permanent approach discussed above, but wthout the sidewalk widening and with slightly different lane widths The street would be slurry sealed and re- striped to provide a clean look A QQ=n o These Jh= improvements City of El Segundo 92 Draft July 18, 2000 Downtown Specific Plan r- 4' R have already been budgeted by the Public Works Department as part of a Citywide slurry seal protect scheduled to begin in September 2000, with the exception of the traffic signal loop detectors the sandblastmo and the decian coats for the new three -lane configuration The re- striping would maintain the existing 56 -foot curb to curb width and 12 foot sidewalk widths, as a temporary measure to analyze traffic and pedestrian movements It is anticipated that the re-striping will help to slow vehicular traffic, without causing congestion, while creating a safer environment for pedestrians The re-striping would provide one through -lane In each direction, a center left -tum lane, and parallel parking on both sides of the street Approximately 8-10 on- street parking spaces would be lost with the re-striping due to the dedicated nght -turn only lanes at the intersections A bike lane could be accommodated in the 100 -200 blocks of Main Street connecting to the bike route on Grand Avenue Estimated cost . 522.765 if e current budgeted CIP prole Simmy seaIIRq and Fe if project is separated from the current CE project scheduled to begin in September 2000. Funding Source Gas Tax (previously approved in 199912000 CIP budget) 3 Street Modifications- (100 -300 Blocks Richmond Street) The only modification proposed for Richmond Street is the installation of infrastructure (conduit) to accommodate future installation of modem high speed "bandwidth" and fiber optic cables. Pacific Bell currently has fiber optic facilities in El Segundo Boulevard west to Whiting Street The conduit on Richmond Street could tie in with these facilities or another provider if their facilities are located in proximity in the future The conduit would provide expanded opportunities and encourage high tech offices and live /work uses. Estimated Cost: $184,200 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, Gas Tax, Prop C (with MTA approval) BID, and /or other assessment district Street Modifications- (100 -200 Blocks West Grand Avenuel Currently Grand Avenue has a right -of -way width of 100 feet with 10 -foot sidewalks on both sides, two driving lanes on each side and parallel parking on both curb lanes The center island is 18 feet in width with a 4 -foot median as well as 7 -foot wide parallel parking on both sides of the median This right -of -way width is the largest in the City west of Sepulveda Boulevard, as it originally accommodated the red car rail lines The existing center street parking is awkward and not pedestrian friendly City of El Segundo 93 Draft July 18, 2000 Downtown Specific Plan KIM "Twinkle" lights- (300 and 400 Blocks of Main Street) "Twinkle" or other seasonal lights have been used very successfully in other downtown's to create an exciting atmosphere Permanent lights using underground utilities, electrical outlets and transformer at each tree location, grounded outlets, weatherproof enclosures, GFCI circuits, and automatic on-off switching devices would be necessary to conform to Uniform Code requirements and for safety and durability The necessary electrical service could be installed at the same time as the street improvements and the new street trees so that there would be minimal disruption. As an option, a cost estimate has been provided for lighting the existing street trees The electrical outlets could also be used to service the lighting and other electrical needs of the farmers market, and other Downtown events Additionally, the lights will require on -going maintenance costs including replacement of burned out bulbs, adjustments of the lights as the trees grow, and replacement of other worn parts Additionally, with the coastal environment it is expected that the strings of lights will need to be totally replaced approximately every 10 years Existing street trees -40 existing street trees -$3000 to $3700 each tree Estimated installation cost: $120,000 to $148,000 Estimated annual maintenance cost: $8720- ($218 per tree) New street trees- After removal of existing street trees Street trees at an average of 30 feet on -center with lights for each tree - 40 and 30 trees per block (20 and 15 each side) 70 total -$3000 to $3700 each tree Estimated installation cost: $210,000 to $258,000 Estimated annual maintenance cost: $15,260- ($218 per tree) Potential Funding Sources General Fund, Gas Tax, Prop C (with MTA approval) BID, and /or other assessment district 10 A two4evel parking structure to accommodate approximately 70 parking stalls could potentially be located on Holly Avenue, east of Main Street The structure could start at Main Street and be located in the Holly Avenue right -of -way and in the landscaped area north of the City Hall building on the City Hall property The structure could extent east to the alley Holly Avenue could be closed to street traffic in this area, but vehicular access to Holly Avenue east of the alley and to City of El Segundo 116 Draft July 18, 2000 Downtown Specific Plan 045 the alley could remain open To accommodate 70 stalls, an area of approximately 100 feet by 140 feet would be required, 400 square feet per stall Due to the constraints of such a small site. The average She cost for construction of _a small structures $19,990 te $4 per stall Another option could be to double -deck the existing City surface parking lot at the southeast comer of Holly Avenue and Standard Street This lot has a significant grade change in that the alley on the east side of the lot is approximately 8 feet lower than the elevation on the west side of the lot abutting Standard Street Access to an upper level open deck could be gained from Standard Street, while a semi- subterranean level could be accessed from the alley This surface lot currently has 33 parking spaces Double- decking would lose spaces in the circulation but gain in the additional level Approximately 70 total spaces could be accommodated on the existing 100' by 140' lot $12 901) PeF stall. Aaam. due to the site constraints, the oarkma would cost between the existing surface parking lot and the surface lot on the west side of Standard Street which services City vehicles were closed, additional spaces could be accommodated The City's traffic engineer states in the Parking Demand Management section of the Specific Plan that currently there is adequate parking in the Downtown, and the potential construction of a parking structure or lot is seen as a long -tern parking solution A structure or lot would only need to be constructed when there is a demand for additional parking spaces, such as when there is construction of new square footage and /or a change in the mix of land uses in the area which increases the parking demand If a parking district, BID or other mechanism is established to collect parking fees, a fee "nexus" study would potentially be required (in accordance with AB 1600) In -lieu fees could be collected for the long -term construction of a lot or structure, and as an intermediate level solution, portions of the fees could be used for re- stripping and signage These intermediate measures would consolidate and create more efficient parking When there is a need, a lot or structure could then be constructed with the balance of the in -lieu fees If there is no need for a new lot or structure after a certain time frame then the in -lieu fees would be refunded Total: , 5210,000 to 5260.000 Funding Sources. General Fund, Gas Tax, Prop C (with MTA approval), in -lieu fees, BID, Parking District, and /or other assessment district City of El Segundo 117 Draft July 18, 2000 Downtown Specific Plan 0 4 G OUTDOOR RETAIL ^47 I Ir hi l l 1 < < -7 t lL 5 1Z L. i s�I 145 SQL 0 5 0 -fi4L Ike- A S l O C l• T E S L;w � I 33I 5 �C J /* _1 At C-a,*-S 0 Yt 146 , 5 5 0 C 1 A T E 5 � arc.. sl�-�. sioeua.l�c. �`'"`�I• s'y- ..s�a� --T, li ►z r Sl l3. s' I v a� I -t' s ll�� �a 21 ` (3.5 'QA 952 tc13,� . 4447 IV/ 1 1 80' .Soo ,A AiRL*v O W. St JI' 'PftRK�NI� EONS • No Lrrr- TtiP-N t.-P • T�+v� -tom GoN(nF�aN • ��t�RSF -D W 1 Pt}�t . Ltt�ttYF�p V'Fh41Lti.>� AG�SS • l'�AHV ���� 1Nbt D iffAU.0 L-Ty TN 053 5&� 148 / � I M N S- F"F- L-1 • INcR��p O N- St�1`i�Jt' PIttZK�NL -,� 6IDI 01� 8U' -S4 EONS • No Lr fvi - TURN LANE, • T�•Ftc. 4on>.fatF- �rto�y po��'1Ar1. • L IM n-t�,p �Mf.�tl�tlF -1,1Cj AGC�SS • �aVL`d7f- 1=1N6I V lflF IU9 t-Tv tN CIA& C) 14 9 !Y l i l-7 8D' MAI R S-TV,,F- 300 AN4LAV Wrm A"L%v 607.6 flz S EONS • I w-v s^se p 'ONO Lei - O N- Spx jfw -r-tip-44 ', YfrRK�NI,� • T7,�.F rte LIMn� -Q GoNV��tcN G�� e9L�.1ns� N 05s _ /3�CX7 150 L OLL EGTS ota GvR� LJ PT}� LIMn� -Q G�� �frth4lLltr • •PEAL. • � 5 PRA�t�Tt. MPoa�L.vsER•+1a6t DICF•lU•7�T�' PI?-0 e9L�.1ns� N 05s _ /3�CX7 150 iT LIJ �i i ' MAIRS71;���T 9s° Av4ALf-Q W" Asimury Guvt6 Gows So PlrRK � I T'ur-m L AtAt �� VIL`d�l onj S1PE>,nN4l..K LJ 1 DT}A +E -+V4tgLC F_�c.`j t�c.�ss -�S Di�t�u�Tl % n5� 15 CONS- Lo►.rr. Midpoint :)f Roof d P N M BUILDING HEIGHTS 1 EXISTING MEASUREMENT PROPOSED MEASUREMENT ant 3f slopm93 cdr 057 3 E M 3 E 2 C O A 2 SN E Existing Grade rv� Sfronf 1 PROPOSED MEASUREMENT ant 3f slopm93 cdr 057 Main Street Shuttle Discussion - Prepared by Meyer, Mohaddes Associates, Inc. A shuttle system that would serve the Main Street area and the employment center area east of Sepulveda Boulevard could be operated only during the time periods of highest demand such as weekday mid -day and potentially expanded to evening hours if successful A shuttle would operate between specified stops in the employment center area and Main Street There is a trade off between the extent of a shuttle service's route and the efficiency of the system A high level of service and frequent shuttles is generally expected by system patrons If the shuttle makes passengers wait more than a few minutes they may become impatient and decide to drive, and on their next visit they will not try the shuttle again. Therefore, the shuttle route must be kept as short as possible, while still serving key activity points In addition, clear signage for the shuttle stops is critical, as are clean, well designed and well lighted shuttle boarding areas (if operated at night) Details regarding a potential shuttle system are provided below Vehicle Tye and Route - Standard 20 foot shuttle buses (similar to the shuttles used in many beach communities) could be used Typical shuttles currently cost approximately $40 to $45 per vehicle per hour to operate (total all expenses and labor) Another option is standard 40- foot coaches similar to MTA buses For purposes of this analysis, the use of smaller shuttle buses is assumed due to their size, easier maneuverability and likely more favorable public acceptance relative to large transit coaches The system would operate from approximately 10 30 AM to 2 30 PM, Monday through Friday, for a total of 1,040 operating hours per year per vehicle Revenue Cost and Summary- The system is assumed to operate using two 20 -foot coaches and to run from the employment center to the Main Street area, with up to three stops The estimated costs include the following. 1) assume 4 operating hours /weekday 2) assume $45/hour per vehicle 3) assume two coaches in operation 4) shuttle operation = $93,600 5) signs at shuttle stops - $500 6) special "Main Street Express" vehicle graphics - $3,000 7) printed schedules - $2,500 8) other miscellaneous costs - $5,000 Approximate Shuttle Cost/Year = $104,600 per year for two coaches in operation, estimated cost for only one coach would be $57,800 per year It is expected that the shuttle would be provided free of charge (to provide incentive for its use) It is critical to note that the success of a shuttle system is heavily dependent on the operations and marketing of the system A shuttle system that is not well marketed or well run will fail to attract riders on a regular basis. Clean, well lighted and attractive stops are required, as are short trip headways, so that passengers are not kept waiting for long periods of time The system would require significant public and/or private investment since little or no revenue could be recovered by fares Also, in an area such as Main Street where parking is free there is little incentive to use a shuttle rather than drive alone Shuttles are often most successful where there is very limited parking opportunity or parking is expensive In the Main Street area, there would be a tendency to seek parking near Main Street in residential area, even if a shuttle is offered 058 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY IMPLEMENTATION AND FINANCING • Slurry seal and re -stripe street - Estimated Cost $22,765 (if completed with current CIP project) $44,265 (if completed as a separate project) 300 -400 Blocks Main Street • "Twinkle" lights- Existing street trees - Estimated installation cost $120,000 to $148,000 - Estimated annual maintenance cost $8720 - Total estimated cost $128,720 to $156,720 PHASE I TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $151,485 to $200,985 Phase 11 - Street and streetscape improvements 300 -400 Blocks Main Street • Sidewalk widening /street narrowing- Estimated Cost $776,000 • Streetscape improvements - (Decorative street lights, benches, trash receptacles, bike racks) Estimated Cost $117,000 • Street Trees -(48 -inch box, "structured soil ", irrigation, water main)- Estimated Cost. $395,897 • Planters at curb - extensions and/or mid -block crosswalks- Estimated Cost $40,000 to $60,000 • Gateway landscaping and signage- Estimated Cost. $45,000 "Twinkle" lights for new street trees, after removal of existing trees- Estimated installation cost $210,000 to $259,000 Estimated annual maintenance cost. $15,260 - Total estimated cost: $225,260 to $274,260 Estimated Total Cost: $1,599,157 to $1,668,157 100 -300 Blocks Richmond Street Street Modifications - (Fiber optic cable conduit) - Estimated Cost $184,200 • Streetscape improvements - (Decorative street lights, benches, trash receptacles, bike racks) Estimated Cost $157,000 Street Trees -(Box size, "structured soil', irrigation, water main)- Estimated Cost ) $423,550-(24 - inch box trees) $476,350436 -inch box trees) $543,550•(48 -inch box trees) Estimated Total Cost: $764,750 to $884,750 P 5 9 100 -200 Blocks West Grand Avenue • Street Modifications - (Median removal, slurry seal, street re- stnping )-Estimated Cost - $80,000 • Streetscape improvements- (Decorative street lights, benches, trash receptacles, bike racks) Estimated Cost- $80,000 • Street Trees -(Box size, "structured soil ", imgation, water main)- Estimated Cost $182,100 -(24 -inch box trees) $204,100 -(36 -inch box trees) $232,100 -(48 -inch box trees) Estimated Total Cost: $324,100 to $392,100 100, 200 and 500 Blocks Main Street • Streetscape improvements- No streetscape improvements are proposed at this time • Street Trees -( Box size, "structured soil ", irrigation, water main)- Estimated Cost: $362,810 -(24 -inch box trees) $398,010 -(36 -inch box trees) $"2,810 -(48 -inch box trees) • Gateway landscaping and signage- Estimated Cost $20,000 Estimated Total Cost: $382,810 to $462,810 PHASE 11 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $3,070,817 to $3,407,817 Parking structure or lot - (Holly Avenue- 100 east Block, east of Main Street to the allev or southeast corner of Holiv Avenue and Standard Street) - Subiect to feasibilitv studv Estimated Cost $2,100,000 to $2,800,000 One way street re- striping- (Holly Avenue -100 east Block, one -way eastbound and Pine Avenue- 100 east Block, one -way westbound) Estimated Cost $16,500 Civic Center Plaza Estimated Cost. $225,000 Parking Management Program Short-term- Visitor Parking Information Guide /Map - Estimated Cost- $5,00- $10,000 • Implement shared parking program - Estimated Cost Low - Staff /Administrative costs • Establish baseline parking ratios for the Downtown and monitor over time- Estimated Cost Moderate-Staff/Administrative costs equivalent to several hours per week, after initial labor intensive inventory • Directional signage- Estimated cost Moderate 2 1.1 • Mid -term- • Trial shared valet parking program during peak season - Estimated cost $5,000- $15,000 per season • On- street angled parking - Estimated cost Moderate Longerterm- • Install parking meters on selected streets - Estimated cost- Moderate to high Initial cost, ultimately self supporting • Add parking with surface lots or structures if necessary- Estimated costs High to very high- (See Parking structure or lot discussion above) Estimated Total Cost: To be determined Public Events, Activities and Programming Estimated Cost $30,000 annually Marketina. Advertising and Promotion Estimated Cost $20,000 annually Development Incentives No cost estimate 'Istoric Preservation No cost estimate Facade Improvement Program No cost estimate Live /work Development Standards "Soft" costs only Financing Options • Redevelopment funds • Property and Business Improvement District (PBID) and Business Improvement Area (BIA) • Parking District Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds • Assessment District • Development Fees • Loans or bonds • Corporate funding P Planning & Building SaferyIPROJECTSkDOWNTOWPNmp lamentation -cost-summary doc 3 ()61 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2000 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Special Orders Of Business — Public Hearings AGENDA DESCRIPTION. Public hearing on a proposed fifteen -year Development Agreement for the proposed 1,500,000 square foot El Segundo Media Center project on the 46 -acre former Rockwell International property bounded by Mariposa Avenue, Nash Street, Atwood Way, and Douglas Street (Environmental Assessment No EA -515 and Development Agreement No, 00 -1) Applicant El Segundo Media Center, LLC. Property owner Federal Express Corporation RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1) Cancel Public Hearing and re- notice for future a meeting BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: Due to two continuances of the Planning Commission public hearing requested by the applicant, on the proposed project, the Planning Commission has not completed its review of the proposed project The Commission is now scheduled to review the project on July 27, 2000. As a result, staff recommends canceling the scheduled City Council public hearing. The public hearing would be rescheduled and re- noticed for a later date to be determined based upon the completion of the review of the project by the Planning Commission A 10 -day public hearing notice will be posted before the future rescheduled public hearing ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: NONE FISCAL IMPACT: NONE ORIGINATED: DATE: James M Hansen, Director of Community, Economic and Development Services Mary Strenn, City Manager DATE: 7�/'fo P \Planning S Budding Safety\PROJECTS \500- 5251EA- 5151EA -515 ais 3 doc 06;1, EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2000 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Take action necessary to give notice of a special election regarding the implementation of a special tax on parking lot businesses COUNCIL ACTION: Adopt the four resolutions attached BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: On July 6,1999 City Council directed staff to prepare documents for the implementation of a 10% tax on all paid parking in the City of EI Segundo, Revenues generated by the tax would be used for police and fire services and public road improvements. Employees of companies that use a parking structure will be exempt from the tax. (continued on next page) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: ➢ Resolution Giving Notice of a Special Municipal Election to be held November 7, 2000 to Provide Revenues for the City's Police and Fire Departments and Public Road Improvements and "Exhibit A" attached Resolution Requesting the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors to Consolidate a Special Municipal Election to be held November 7, 2000 with the General Election Resolution Setting Priorities for Filing Written Arguments Regarding City Measures and Directing City Attorney to Prepare an Impartial Analysis of the Measure Resolution Providing for the Filing of Rebuttal Arguments for City Measures Submitted at Municipal Elections FISCAL IMPACT: Potential Revenue Source of $350,000 to $450,000 annually; Onetime costs for Special Election of $20,000 FY 2000 -2001 Operating Budget: Amount Requested: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: $0 $20,000 001400- 1302.6214 Special Municipal Election Yes ORI9INATED: _ DATE: > 212-0O Bret Plum lee, ire or of Finance �� � -6 'r, i ty r ind Mali u' J REVJEWD DATE: t /o X63 3 BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION CONTINUED: City Council with respect to placing a tax measure on the ballot The actions described below may be desirable but they are not mandatory. The City Council may, in Its discretion, adopt a resolution authorizing any or all of the Council Members to prepare and submit a written argument regarding the proposed tax measure. The legislative body, or any member or members of the legislative body authorized by that body, or any individual voter who is eligible to vote on the measure, or bona fide association of citizens, or any combination of voters and associations, are all authorized, pursuant to Section 9282 of the Elections Code to file a written argument for or against any city measure If the City Clerk, in her capacity as the city elections official, receives more than one argument, she must select one of the arguments to be printed and distributed to the voters Section 9287 of the Elections Code sets out the preference and priority that the city elections official must comply with as follows- 1 The legislative body, or member or members of the legislative body authorized by that body 2 The individual voter, or bona fide association of citizens, or combination of voters and associations, who are the bona fide sponsors or proponents of the measure 3 Bona fide associations of citizens 4 Individual voters who are eligible to vote on the measure. Thus, if the City Council chooses not to authorize one or more of its Members to prepare an argument, individual voters or bona fide associations of citizens will have the opportunity to have their arguments, if any, printed and distributed to the voters In addition, pursuant to Section 9280 of the Elections Code, the City Council may, in its discretion, authorize and direct the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis of the measure showing the effect of the measure on the existing law and the operation of the measure Notice that a special election will be held in November must be submitted to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors by August 11, 2000. It is important to point out that because of the critical timing of this notice, the analysis included with the report is preliminary only, and staff will continue to research and fine - tune the fiscal impact until the November 7, 2000 election. C (,5 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF HOLDING A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2000, FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF A SPECIAL TAX ON PARKING LOT BUSINESSES TO PROVIDE REVENUES FOR THE CITY'S POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS AND FOR PUBLIC ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Whereas, Article XIII C requires that special taxes be approved by a two - thirds vote of the people, and Whereas, the People of the City of El Segundo ( "City") desire to impose a tax for purposes of providing revenue for the operation of the City's Police and Fire Departments and for public road improvements to maintain the fiscal integrity of the City and to ensure that the City continues to meet its obligations to the community in the provision of these vital public services, and Whereas, the City Council desires to maintain a fair system of taxation that equitably applies the business license tax to the businesses in the City; and Whereas, the City already taxes businesses based on the number of employees employed within the City, and Whereas, an exemption from the proposed tax Is provided for employee parking to maintain the desired fairness and equity in the City's taxation system, and Whereas, under the provisions of the laws of the State of California, a Special Municipal Election shall be held on November 7, 2000 to submit to the voters at the election a question relating to the adoption of a business license tax on parking lot businesses NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section I That to provide revenues for the operation of the City's Police and Fire Departments and for public road improvements the City is placing on the ballot an amendment of the parking lot tax Section 2 That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California, there is called and ordered to be held to the City of El Segundo, California, on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, a Special Municipal Election. RESOLUTION NO PARKING LOT TAX PAGE NO I 066 Section 3. That the City Council, pursuant to its right and authority, does order submitted to the voters at the Special Municipal Election the following question "Shall an Ordinance be adopted that replaces the current YES business license fee of $10 per year on shuttle service parking stalls with a special 10% tax on gross receipts on all parking, except employee parking, for purposes of providing revenues for police and fire services and public road NO improvements " Section 4 That the proposed measure to be submitted to the voters is attached hereto as Exhibit A Section 5 That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as required by law Section 6. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the electron Section 7 That the polls for the election shall be open at seven o'clock a.m of the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o'clock p m of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14401 of the Electrons Code of the State of Califorma Section 8 That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding mumcipal elections Section 9 That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the electron, in time, form and manner as required by law. Section 10. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions RESOLUTION NO PARKING LOT TAX PAGE NO 2 067 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 18`s day of July, 2000 Mike Gordon Mayor ATTEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 181" day of July, 2000, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote F—AV!=K' NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. Mark D.Nensley, City Attom RESOLUTION NO PARKING LOT TAX PAGE NO 3 1•S' ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 5.08.527, ENTITLED "PARKING LOTS," OF CHAPTER 5.08, ENTITLED "BUSINESS LICENSE SCHEDULE," OF TITLE 5, ENTITLED "BUSINESS REGULATIONS AND LICENSING," OF THE EL SEGUNDO MUNICIPAL CODE BY IMPOSING A GROSS RECEIPTS TAX ON PARKING LOT BUSINESSES AND ELIMINATING THE PER PARKING SPACE TAX THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Section 5 08 527, entitled "PARKING LOTS," of Chapter 5 08, entitled "BUSINESS LICENSE SCHEDULE," of Title 5, entitled `BUSINESS REGULATIONS AND LICENSING," of the El Segundo Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows "5 08 527 PARKING LOTS Every person engaged in the business of operating a parking lot for vehicles shall pay a business license tax of ten percent (10 %) of annual gross receipts generated from the operation of the parking lot For purposes of this section, the term "gross receipts" shall mean gross income, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code The business license tax imposed by this section shall not apply to receipts attributable to employee parking for a building located in the City which is serviced by the parking lot " Section 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance or any part thereof Section 3 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and enter it into the book of original Ordinances. Section 4 The City Clerk shall publish or post the ordinance according to law ORDINANCE NO PARKING LOT TAX PAGE NO I 069 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO CONSOLIDATE A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 7, 2000, WITH THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE Whereas, the City Council ( "City Council ") of the City of El Segundo ( "City ") adopted its Resolution No on July 18, 2000 calling a Special Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, for the purpose of submitting to the voters the question relating to the adoption of a special business license tax on parking lots, and Whereas, it is desirable that the Special Municipal Election with respect to the question relating to the adoption of a business license tax on parking lots be consolidated with the school election to be held on November 7, 2000, and that within the city the precincts, polling places and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the county election department of the County of Los Angeles canvass the returns of the Special Municipal Election and the election be held in all respects as if there were one election, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 That pursuant to the requirements of Section 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidate a Special Municipal Election with the School election on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, for the purpose of placing an initiative measure on the ballot Section 2 That a measure is to appear on the ballot as follows- "Shall an Ordinance be adopted that replaces the current YES business license fee of $10 per year on shuttle service parking stalls with a special 10% tax on gross receipts on all parking, except employee parking, for purposes of providing revenues for police and fire services and public road NO improvements " RESOLUTION NO REQUEST COUNTY TO CONSOLIDATE A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION, NOV 7, 2000 PAGE NO I 070 Section 3 That the county election department is authorized to canvass the returns of the Special Municipal Election The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used Section 4 That the Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the county election department to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election Section 5 That the City of El Segundo recognizes that costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for all costs related thereto Section 6 That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the county election department of the County of Los Angeles Section 7 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 18th day of July, 2000 Mike Gordon Mayor ATTEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18'" day of July, 2000, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote AYES NOES U&T-F ki ABSTAIN Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM, Mark D. Hensley, City Att'c 9mey RESOLUTION NO REQUEST COUNTY TO CONSOLIDATE A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION, NOV 7.20W PAGE NO 2 071 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING CITY MEASURES AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF THE MEASURE Whereas, a Special Municipal Election is to be held in the City of El Segundo, California, on November 7, 2000, at which there will be submitted to the voters the following measure "Shall an Ordinance be adopted that replaces the current business license fee of $10 per year on shuttle service parking stalls with a special 10% tax on gross receipts on all parking, except employee parking, for purposes of providing revenues for police and fire services and public road improvements " NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 That the City Council authorizes [Mayor][Council Member] to file, on behalf of the City Council, a written argument regarding the proposed City measure set forth above, in accordance with the Elections Code of the State of California, Division 9, Chapter 3, Article 4, commencing with Section 9280, which argument shall include the signatures of the each Council Member who wishes his or her signature to appear. The City Council further authorizes the inclusion of the signatures of other persons or organizations as the Council Member(s) wish, not to exceed five (5) signatures on each argument, and to change the argument until and including the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or against the City measure may be submitted to the City Clerk Section 2. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the measure to the City Attorney. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure showing the effect of the measure on the existing law and the operation of the measures The impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the City Clerk for the filing of primary arguments Section 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of onginal Resolutions RESOLUTION NO CITY ATTORNEY IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE n PAGE NO 1 0 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on tlus 18th day of July, 2000 Mike Gordon Mayor ATTEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18th day of July, 2000, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM- Mark D Hensley, City At omey RESOLUTION NO CITY ATTORNEY IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE PAGE NO 2 073 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS Whereas, Sections 9220 and 9285 of the Elections Code of the State of California authorizes the City Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions to provide for the filing of rebuttal arguments for city measures submitted at municipal elections, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 That pursuant to Sections 9220 and 9285 of the Elections Code of the State of California, when the clerk has selected the arguments for and against the measure which will be printed and distributed to voters, the clerk shall send copies of the argument in favor of the measure to the authors of the argument against, and copies of the argument against to the authors of the argument in favor The authors may prepare and submit rebuttal arguments not exceeding 250 words The rebuttal arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk not more than 10 days after the final date for filing direct arguments Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same manner as the direct arguments Each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut Section 2 That all previous resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for city measures are repealed and superseded Section 3 That the provisions of Section 1 shall only apply to the special municipal election to be held on November 7, 2000, and shall then be repealed Section 4 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions RESOLUTION NO FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURE PAGE NO I 074 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 18th day of July, 2000 Mike Gordon Mayor ATTEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18th day of July, 2000, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote. AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Mark D. Hensley, City Atto RESOLUTION NO FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURE PAGE NO 2 075 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2000 AGENDA REM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS & BOARDS AGENDA DESCRIPTION. Announce appointments to the Recreation & Parks Commission, the Planning Commission, Economic Development Advisory Council and Library Board of Trustees. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: (1) Announce appointments and respective terms of office, (2) Extend expired terms of office, (3) Continue Schedule of Interviews to Committee /Commission &Board: # of Openings Anvointee(sl. T rm Exvrrers) Recreation & Parks Commission 1 05/30104 Planning Commission 2 06130/04 06/30/04 Economic Development Advisory Council Bus 3 no exp. no exp no exp. Res 1 no exp. Library Board of Trustees 2 06/30/03 06/30/01' N Short term due to resignation BRIEF SUMMARY: Recruitment will continue for openings on the Investment Advisory Committee, Senior Citizen Housing Corporation Board, LAXMAC, Capital Improvement Program Advisory Committee and Community Cable Advisory Committee, until 48 hours prior to City Council setting interview date for the balance of these CCBs ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: NIA FISCAL IMPACT: N/A ORIGINATED. Julia Abreu Mason, Council Assistant Date: July 12, 2000 REVIEWED BY: Mary Strenn, City Manager Date: July 12, 2000 /s/u dam uKcbV000a7 W Announce,rcm of a ouu,n, to Rec Pk Pho Comm EDAC and LL W ll 7 6 z° SLL 0 y �f y � yV H F Qa UZ 3 W W C O K 3 W O b � C W a H H i 4 W 4 W 6 f N2 0i2 .� W O a O O > OZ O O O O O O Y Y Y < W W W LL i S S "01 \ H N � U V U O £U. W.- E q SOpm� U H S d Eta S b E a a E 8 5g g a a Gi` 1� o z pO S p u migj9gE' Y 2O O Q O O�< j Y s LL Wu2 w W z x� uF� i iin �n puT y�Sl1i1y[� c 5>> 3 ° g�Ci6 3 Z F p LL yyy Hyyy������ �S ZQ O T s g. Z N K W J W y I J 3 C S E E 1i LL N W O> F r j J 3 H? rc W E m H 6 W p Ti S S oW°W a} o ^� 2 o L< Q �r�wzn a wz Pd O �_w �_ SE+ o �yx " "a�g��g3g� mpg° U m x U x t q, -° 8go$= _-_-- -pRR�S?53����5�$� N q S L R a 9 5 T LivJ rdrE� W � ry ° aw c` g LH U y q E - g E a 8 3 0 ti OU a 4 6 0 Z 0 O 077 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER 6/1012000 THROUGH 6/23/2000 Date Payee Amount Description 5/3/00 Health Comp 29930 Weekly eligible claims 4/28 6/12/00 West Basin 737,254 00 H2O Payment 6/14/00 Health Comp 1,58929 Weekly eligible claims 6/9 6/14/00 Wells Fargo 25,000 00 Workers Comp 6/14/00 Wells Fargo 30,000 00 TPT The Lakes Golf Payroll Transfer 6/16/00 Federal Reverse Bank 20000 Employee Bond PR25 6/16/00 Federal Reverse Bank 20000 Employee Bond PR26 6/19/00 Wells Fargo 50,000 00 Workers Camp 6/22/00 Health Comp 2,23416 Weekly eligible claims 6/16 6/22/00 IRS 159,351 31 Federal Taxes PR26 6/22/00 Employment Development 29,795 19 State Taxes PR26 Not listed on 5/16/00 memo 1,035,923 25 DATE OF RATIFICATION, 7/05/00 TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE: Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by �'3G Lo Deputy Treasurer 1\ /� G //� Date Finance Director , �� / f7�2 Date City Manager C Date 1,035,923.25 Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo i O C c P 4 ? m T T D 3 m 3a V R r m n Y n 3 7 m A m > £ T a N 'o n 3 m 0 R S� ll �a "I �S GmQ 65 j0 �m�Rm D $ O �gm3€ S�AZa Y33� m F$ A �Ann O $ 3 i 08.0 3 a O g � 3 I y �g yc 3 as C� n�y3 tl u N j m 2 g R o^ m 3 0 S n S m F p O C zm 's0 a r a m z r gR na C i 3 8 e °a o' m °m m 8� y� ~ <O n D b O m T m � N g Y 9 T Y 0 3 m fNnn "''1111 mm ST m yyyy > n ypy 9 9 A a a 2 m r 4 m D y m m y y C m I�� i m m a m a$ c c c I, m c c .zi ' z i >: ai c= o yoom5 y on oszzz SN K G 3 A z m m C N c z N n73 VI Npp rAIY (yOy OqI qyrqy ��pp�pppO pN yy �Wp ppr �pVp IJNmNLI � � OyOOI�\ � N � W 10 pDn A pY qO yTN O Y N V yY pN S T N N OI N Vii >+ W W 01 m p yp mT O� m= N N cO c g � -1 m O yT 9 V A O D R n73 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER 6124/2000 THROUGH 7/7/2000 Date Payee Amount Description 6/26100 Wells Fargo 30,000 00 Workers Comp Transfer 6127/00 Wells Fargo 30,000 00 TPT The Lakes Golf Payroll Transfer 6/28/00 Health Comp 1,67807 Weekly eligible claims 6/23 6/30/00 Federal Reserve Bank 25000 Employee Savings Bonds PR1 7/3/00 Pitney Bowes 10,000 00 Postage Machine 716/00 Health Comp 1,00818 Weekly eligible claims 6/30 7/6100 IRS 173,980 88 Federal Taxes PR1 7/6100 Employment Development 33,007 01 State Taxes PR1 279, 924 14 DATE OF RATIFICATION: 5116100 TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE: Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by Deputy Treasurer /o Date Finance Director 1 711 %1000 Date City Manager Date 279,924,14 i.l MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JUNE 20, 2000 - 5:00 P.M. 5:00 PM Session CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Gordon at 5:00 p.m ROLL CALL - Mayor Gordon - Present Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs - Present Council Member Gaines - Present arrived at 5 05 p.m. Council Member McDowell - Present Council Member Wernick - Present arrived at 5:05 p.m CLOSED SESSION: The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, et sea.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator, and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel); and /or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as follows: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a)) 1 City of El Segundo v. Bd. of Airport Commissioners, et al., LASC Case No. BC 220609 2 Ralston v El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 036223 3 Hill v El Segundo, USDC No. CV 98- 1463- LGB(SHX) 4. Valone Williams v. Brian D. Evanski, et al., LASC Case No. 99CO2571 5 Venegas v El Segundo, LASC Case No BC207136 6 In re Randall's Island Family Golf Centers, Inc., U S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, Case No. 00- 41065. 7 City of El Segundo v. Stardust, LASC Case No. YC031364 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956 9(b). -1- potential case (no further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c) -3- matters. DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Govt Code §54957) — None CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957.6) — City Representative Mary Strenn and Richard Kopenhefer, Employee Organizations. City Employees' Association, Supervisory & Professional Employees' Association, El Segundo Firefighters' Association, El Segundo Police Officers' Association, and all unrepresented employees CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) — None. MINUTES OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL JUNE 20, 2000 6 PAGE NO 1 081 REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JUNE 20, 2000 - 7:00 P.M. Council recessed at 6 55 p.m. Council reconvened at 7 00 p m 7:00 PM Session CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Gordon at 7 00 p m INVOCATION — Clerk Mortesen PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Council Member Nancy Wemick PRESENTATIONS (a) Presentation by Ms. Kristy Hennessey, Vice - President, Time- Warner, regarding proposed upgrade and discussion of other options. ROLL CALL Mayor Gordon - Present Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs - Present Council Member Gaines - Present Council Member McDowell - Present Council Member Wemick - Present PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a line of $250 While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item on the agenda The Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed Jerry Saunders, Continental Development Corporation, commented on the proposed parking tax. Peggy Tyre[[, resident, spoke regarding the direction of the Council to investigate the possibility of a CRA, and the help requested by the Air Force Base. Liz Garnholz, resident, spoke regarding the direction of the Council to investigate the possibility of a CRA, and the help requested by the Air Force Base. Also requested an update on other cable companies, and requested a clarification of conflict of interest and Consent Agenda Item #12, a resolution adopting a new Conflict of Interest Code Bill Mason, Chamber of Commerce, addressed the proposed parking tax. Gail Church, Treemuskateers, reported on the trees planted on Grand Avenue. MINUTES OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL JUNE 20, 2000 PAGE NO 2 ME Dorothy Kent, resident, spoke regarding the CRA, and airport issues Frank Wong, resident, spoke regarding the general funds spent on opposing the airport expansion. He also spoke regarding CRAs A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS action taken later in the meeting B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS - Public hearing on the Downtown Specific Plan. The Plan area generally encompasses the 100 -500 blocks of Main Street, the 100 -300 blocks of Richmond Street, and abutting properties on Grand Avenue. [Environmental Assessment No EA-474 (Mitigated Negative Declaration), General Plan Amendment No 99 -2, Zone Change No 99 -2 and Zone Text Amendment No 99 -5] Applicant City of El Segundo, Property owners- Various Mayor ProTem Jacobs left the dais, 7:30 P.M. NOTE THAT MAYOR PRO TEM JACOBS NOT PARTICIPATING DUE TO A POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a public hearing on the Downtown Specific Plan. The Plan area generally encompasses the 100 -500 blocks of Main Street, the 100 -300 blocks of Richmond Street, and abutting properties on Grand Avenue [Environmental Assessment No. EA-474 (Mitigated Negative Declaration), General Plan Amendment No. 99 -2, Zone Change No 99 -2 and Zone Text Amendment No 99 -5] Applicant- City of El Segundo, Property owners, Various Clerk Mortesen stated that proper notice of the Hearing was given in a timely manner and four written communications had been received by the City Clerk's Office regarding this Public Hearing. Jim Hansen, CEDS, and Chris Ketz, Planning Manager, gave a brief presentation Liz Gamholz, resident, addressed the height limit of 45 feet, and parking changes. Bill Crigger, Co -Chair of the Downtown Task Force, spoke in favor of the plan. Mike Rastowski, property owner, expressed concern about the restriction of retail only on the ground floor, and closing of alleyways. John Purcell, property owner, expressed concern about the restriction of retail only on ground floor He also objects to the proposal for the Purcell alley, and Purcell Plaza. MINUTES OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL JUNE 20, 2000 PAGE NO 3 083 David Levy, owner of the abandoned Ralph's Market property, stated that if he were prohibited from renting the property as office space, he would have difficulty - finding tenants. Peggy Tyrell, resident, spoke regarding a letter in the Daily Breeze, regarding Ralph's Market vacant property. Staff to respond to Council's comments and concerns and report back at the July 18, 2000 City Council Meeting MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Wernick to continue the Public Hearing to July 18, 2000. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0 MAYOR PROTEM JACOBS NOT PARTICIPATING. Mayor ProTem returned to the dais at 8.45 P M A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only MOVED by Council Member Wernick, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to read all ordinance and resolutions on this Agenda by title only MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE. 5/0 C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 2. Request for City Council to set interviews of candidates to the various Committees, Commissions and Boards Consensus of Council to set Interviews for July 18, 2000 3 a) Council Sub - Committee for the Senior Housing Board — Report on proposed rent increase for Park Vista PULLED FROM THE AGENDA PER REQUEST OF SUB - COMMITTEE OF THE SENIOR HOUSING BOARD Council Member McDowell requested to schedule another meeting of the sub- committee. b) Proposal of 3% rent increase at Park Vista for 17 months beginning August 1, 2000 through December 31, 2001 An additional annual 1.5% increase is also proposed from January 1, 2002 through December 2005 PULLED FROM THE AGENDA PER REQUEST OF SUB - COMMITTEE OF THE SENIOR HOUSING BOARD MINUTES OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL JUNE 20, 2000 PAGE NO 4 i E. CONSENT AGENDA All Items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously If a call for discussion of an Item Is made, the item(s) will be considered Individually under the next heading of business. 4 Approve Warrant Numbers 251 0561 - 251 081 1 on Register No 17 in total amount of $1,430,548.65 and Wire Transfers in the amount of $254,213 85 Approve City Council meeting minutes of June 6, 2000. 6 Adopt Ordinance No 1318 of the City of El Segundo, California, amending chapter 8.12 of the El Segundo Municipal Code by adding Section 8 12 160 relating to dog park rules 7 Accept the work as complete for the 1998 -99 Replacement of Water Mains — Project No. PW 98 -10 (final contract amount = $325,474.00) and authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the County Recorders Office. 8 Approve renewal of Library's annual periodical subscription list with EBSCO Subscription Services for the period September 1, 2000 - August 31, 2001. Fiscal Impact $13,564 9 Approve Resolution No 4166 authorizing the annual destruction of identified records in accordance with the provisions of Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California. The City Attorney has consented to the plan for records destruction 10 Approve the renewal of General Services Agreement (GSA), Contract No. 2800, (between the City and the County of Los Angeles for another five (5) years commencing on July 1, 2000 for services performed by the County on behalf of the City and authorize the Mayor to execute 11 Approve award of contract to National Plant Services, Inc., for the cleaning and Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) inspection of sewer lines — Project No.: PW 00 -6 (contract amount = $212,887.72) and authorize the Mayor to sign the Standard Public Works Construction Agreement, Contract No. 2801, after approval as to form by the City Attorney. 12 PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY THE PUBLIC 13 Acceptance of the installation of chain link fencing for Storm Water Pump Station No 17 and Dog Park — Project No. PW 99 -7 (final contract amount $71,484.00) and authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's Office MINUTES OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL JUNE 20. 2000 PAVP% 5 14. Approve examination plans for the Personnel Merit System lob classification of LicenselPermit Specialist Illl MOVED by Council Member Wernick, SECONDED by Council Member Gaines to approve Consent Agenda items 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 14 MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510 CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA 12 Adopt Resolution No. 4167 of the City Council rescinding Resolution Number 4147, and adopting a new resolution approving a new Conflict of Interest Code MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Wernick, to adopt Resolution No 4167 of the City Council rescinding Resolution Number 4147, and adopting a new resolution approving a new Conflict of Interest Code. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510 F. NEW BUSINESS — 15. Take action necessary to give notice of a special election regarding the Implementation of a special tax on parking lot businesses ITEM POSTPONED TO JULY 18, 2000, REGULAR MEETING G. REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - NONE H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY - NONE REPORTS - CITY CLERK - NONE REPORTS - CITY TREASURER - NONE K. REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Council Member McDowell - Addressed the Downtown specific plan further Council Member Gaines - Thanked the public for their show of concern and donations. Council Member Wernick - Reported on various meetings. Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs - Reported on our cultural exchange. Mayor Gordon - Reported on the merger of US Air. Also encouraged everyone to participate in the July 4'", celebration. MINUTES OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL JUNE 20, 2000 PAGE NO 6 rim PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Oniv - 5 minute limit) Individuals, who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identity themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250 While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda The Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed Liz Garnholz, resident, requested a status of her public records request for a copy of Cable investigation, and clanfication of Conflict of Interest regarding June 7, 2000 vote on the air force issue Sandra Mason, resident, spoke regarding the trashcans on Main Street, and the need to empty them more frequently and clean them more often. ADJOURNMENT - in celebration of the birth of Luke Hannes, son of Chef Hannes and his wife Also the celebration of Mayor Gordon's son, Gordy's 7'" Birthday. CLOSED SESSION - NONE ADJOURNMENT at 9 30 p.m Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL JUNE 20, 2000 PAGE NO 7 (Ii EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2000 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: City Council designation of Waste Management as a single source for disposal of green waste since fiscal year costs will exceed $10,000 (Fiscal Impact — None — transfer of funds from one Department of Public works account to another to be done ) RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve designation BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: Waste management was issued a contract this fiscal year for $9,900 to dispose of green waste This amount has now been depleted and $8,000 is required to perform this service for the next three months Waste Management has been performing their duties very well and it is recommended that they be designated as a single source to perform this service for the remainder of this year The budget for this activity was based on past expenses It is apparent that one of the reasons for the increase in green waste volume is the deposit of green waste by commercial contractors and residents from other municipalities Measures are being explored to limit the placement of green waste at the City Facility to City of El Segundo residents only For example moving the green waste receiving site to the inside of the Maintenance Facility yard, looking at daily work day hours and limited Saturday hours for green waste disposal or once -a -month all day Saturday receiving times, and appropriate signage and site overview to discourage illegal dumping ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: Amount Requested: $8,00000 Account Number: 001400- 4206 -6206 Project Phase: Appropriation Required: N/A ORIGINATED BY: ,mj Date: Andres Santamaria, Director of Public Works JUL 112000 REVIEWED BY: I Date: Strenn /00 4,"n0a Iterm"ende Waste Mgmt 02 . . EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2000 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Request from Hughes Space and Communications (HSC) to hang a 2,500 square foot banner to celebrate the sale of HSC to the Boeing Company The sign would be located on the west side of HSC building S03A at 901 North Nash Street for one week beginning approximately August 1, 2000 and then relocated to the east side of 2300 East Imperial Highway for approximately 11 weeks from the start date (Sign Plan 00 -12) The precise start date will be dependant on the final approval of the acquisition Applicant. Hughes Space and Communications. COUNCIL ACTION: Approve HSC's request to hang its temporary banner until approximately October 31, 2000 BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: On July 6 2000, HSC submitted a letter to the City requesting approval of a 25'x 25' (2,500 square feet) temporary sign which would exceed the guidelines of the City's Sign Code Section 20.60 080H of the Municipal Code requires that any sign over 500 square feet must be approved by the City Council As the sign is temporary and will be installed only for three months, staff believes that it is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Sign Code On November 23, 1999, the Council approved a 1,200 square foot temporary announcement banner for the east side of 2300 E Imperial Highway during renovations of the building That banner has been removed (Continued on next page. . 1 Request letter from HSC, dated July 6, 2000 2 Photo Simulations of Banner on Building Elevations 3 Letter from Proficiency Capital (property owner of 2300 E Imperial Hwy ) FISCAL IMPACT: NONE ORIGINATED: DATE: ��s M Hansen, Director of Community, Economic and Development Services I sLI City Manager 7 Z/ t : S� STAFF REPORT July18, 2000 Page 2 BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: (cont) The temporary banner Is an enlarged version of the Boeing Company logo HSC is being purchased by Boeing and the sign is Intended to celebrate this event In the past, the Council has approved even larger promotional banners for DIrecTV and Mattel, Inc (Barbee postage stamp banner) Since, according to the property owner, HSC will soon be a tenant of the 2300 E Imperial Highway building, staff does not believe that the sign would be considered as off -site segnage, which Is prohibited by the Zoning Code Additionally, the sign will require a Building Safety permit to ensure that It Is safety constructed and attached to the building Strength, safety, stress, and wend load analysis will be required to ensure the safety and structure Integrity of the Installation of the sign Standard Indemnification and liability Insurance well also be required P Planning & Budding SafetyVSP00 -12 ais doc ME d-tUGHES SPACE & COMMUNICArIONS 6 July, 2000 Mr Paul Garry Associate Planner Community, Economic and Development Services Department City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 Re Boeing Celebration Banner to be Installed at 901 North Nash Street and relocated to 2300 Imperial Highway Paul Hughes Space & Communications Is hereby requesting City Council approval of our proposal to temporarily place a commemorative banner on the West facade at 901 North Nash Street (HSC Budding S03A) in conjunction with an employee gathering celebrating the acquisition of Hughes Space & Communications by the Boeing Company Within one week following the employee gathering we would then propose to relocate the banner to the East facade of 2300 Imperial Highway (HSC Building S05) where it would remain for a period not -to- exceed three months We propose the banner to be installed beginning on approximately 8/1/00 and removed by 10/31/00 I've enclosed two "artists concept sketches" showing the proposed banner in both the S03A and S05 locations As prescribed by the Zoning Code the banner will be constructed using lightweight, weather resistant fabric that is mechanically attached to the building for structural support. The banner will be approximately 50' -0" w x 50' -0" h (2,500sf) and will include the "Boeing Signature" (logo) As I mentioned, HSC has not yet officially occupied the 2300 Imperial Highway budding Currently we are in the final negotiations to lease four floors in this building Therefore, I've also enclosed a letter from the owner's representative, confirming this, and Indicating their support for the proposed temporary banner installation S ncerely, C n AIA Section Manager, Engineering encl Artists Concept Sketches (S03A & S05), dated 5 July 2000 Proficiency Capital Corporation letter, dated 30 June 2000 cc Jeffrey N. Trenton, President, Proficiency Ell Segundo Corporation N. H. Hall, Senior Real Estate Associate, Hughes Electronics W P Hendricks, Manager, Facilities and Plant Engineering, Hughes Space & Communications ' ^ JUL - 7 2U t 1000706a page 1 of 1 091 Hughes Space and Communications Company Loc SC \ Bldg S41 \ MS A395 PO Box 92919 Los Angeles, CA 90009 Nil �� \} �\ < � � % an I � � co R � � I cc .� 0L E O m O CY) N Co . 00 Lo O co LZ O a.— 0\ � E_/ F— / 093 ~ mom A IMP � < � � % an I � � co R � � I cc .� 0L E O m O CY) N Co . 00 Lo O co LZ O a.— 0\ � E_/ F— / 093 .'d�f�III CAPITAL CAPITAL CORPORATION June 30, 2000 Mr Paul Garry Assistant Planner City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 RE: BANNER INSTALLATION 2300 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA Dear Paul: Proficiency Imperial Limited Partnership is the owner of the building at the above - referenced location. As the authorized representative of the ownership, I hereby acknowledge that Hughes Space and Communications Company ( "HSC ") (soon to be acquired by Boeing) is currently in final negotiations of a lease to occupy four floors of said building. It is anticipated that construction will commence within the next few months and occupancy occurring upon completion thereof Subject to compliance with all City of El Segundo codes and regulations, and subject to my filial approval, HSC has the go -ahead for their plans regarding the installation of the temporary banner as proposed by Mr. Don Heep of HSC Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the foregoing Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, PROFICIENCY IMPERIAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By Proficiency El Segundo Corporation Its General Partner By Jeffrey N Trenton Its- President 11•M 11755 Wilshire Boulevard • Suite 2220 • Los Angeles, California 90025 • Phone (310) 914 -7411 • Fax (310) 268 -9188 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2000 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Request for City Council to approve the purchase of twelve in -car video systems using Equipment Replacement and Asset Forfeiture funds totaling $47,348.55 RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION- Approve the purchase of twelve Mobile Vision in -car video systems for the new fleet of police units on a sole- source basis. BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION. The Police Department has been using in -car video systems in police units since 1994. This video technology has been useful in training, increasing criminal prosecutions and reducing civil liability exposure In the FY 99/2000 budget, staff was authorized to purchase 12 mobile video systems to replace the existing outdated and high maintenance equipment. Two of the twelve cameras are eligible for purchase using Asset Forfeiture funds while the remaining ten will be purchased with Equipment Replacement funds (Continued Page 2) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS* Staff Report Mobile Vision quotation FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: $ 56,000 Amount Requested: $ 47,348.55 Account Number: 601 -400- 0000 -8104 $39,457 13 and 109 -400- 3105 -8104 $7,891.42 Project Phase: Appropriation Required: ORIGINATED. DATE: July 12 2000 of Police July iz, zuuu Manager w M BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION (Continued) The current in -car video systems have become costly to maintain, requiring video technicians to make service calls on a regular basis. These regular service calls combined with the replacement of expensive components within the system have resulted in high maintenance costs, depleting the funds budgeted for repair. Due to non - operating video systems, staff has been unable to provide the training, added prosecutorial evidence and protection from civil liability that working systems provide Only Mobile Vision can provide a system with superior service capabilities, options not duplicated in any other system, replacement units for broken or damaged systems, local repair availability, upgradeable systems with a buy back program, and excellent warranties 096 eil INTER- DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE July 7, 2000 To Tim Gnmmond, Chief of Police From Elizabeth C Gray, Sergeant (through channels) Subject In -Car Video Systems PROPOSAL It is proposed that the in -car video systems in all police units be replaced with new Mobile Vision equipment Equipment Replacement Funds are available for this purchase BACKGROUND The Police Department has been using in -car video systems in police units since 1994. The tool has been useful in training, increasing criminal prosecutions and reducing civil liability exposure In FY 9912000, staff was authorized to purchase 12 mobile video systems to replace the existing outdated and high maintenance equipment Two of the cameras will be installed in K -9 vehicles that were not previously equipped and are, therefore, eligible for purchase using Asset Forfeiture funds The remaining ten cameras are replacing existing equipment and must be purchased with Equipment Replacement funds The current system has allowed staff to identify critical needs of the department regarding vital elements of a video camera company and system. Those vital elements include. - Immediate response for repair from a certified and local facility - Instant replacement of a non - operating system when the existing system needs to be shipped back to the manufacturer - Timely response to system inquiries - A wireless microphone that activates automatically when the video system is turned on - An in -car audio system that records on a different track than what the officer's microphone picks up - Simplified installation and operation which allows our city maintenance personnel to install and trouble shoot operational problems - Ability to be upgraded as new technology becomes available without the costs of replacing the entire system - Ease of operation - Durability of system - System security and integrity - Warranty - Cost - Past and current record with surrounding agencies, specifically Manhattan Beach P.D , Hawthorne P D and Gardena P D 097 In -Car Video Systems July 7, 2000 Page 2 Four manufacturers provided information on each of their systems Staff has subsequently reviewed and evaluated the various devices available After this review, staff concluded that Mobile Vision's product is the only system that provides all of the critical items identified above Examples of Mobile Vision's attention to customer service, product support, and advanced product line include the contracting with a Los Angeles area company to provide technical support for the Mobile Vision system They have agreed to provide training to city maintenance personnel for installation and day -to -day servicing of the units, and to provide a backup unit when a system is shipped to the manufacturer Mobile Vision's wireless microphone component is the only one available that automatically activates when the system is powered up The Mobile Vision system will also be fully upgradeable to a digital recording system when that option becomes available To facilitate the upgrades, Mobile Vision will be offering buy back plans for outdated equipment Mobile Vision offers a multi -unit discount not available through many of the other manufacturers They also do not require the system be installed by their own installers to validate the two -year warranty Mobile Vision and their system offer a number of vital element advantages not found on other systems as listed above In addition, it is a system that has adequate technical backup, which is required for this type of high maintenance equipment A Mobile Vision unit was purchased in March 2000 to install and review the installation and operating procedures in one of the new units Installation instructions were clear and easy to follow allowing the City's vehicle maintenance personnel to fully install the system RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the purchase of twelve Mobile Vision in -car video systems on a sole- source basis to be installed in the new police units. ^98 II OBILE vislam- IN -CAR Vj0bI? 3 Tb I CM Tax ID# 22- 2893537 Quotation ALyborized By V &.,u do 40, 1447 Valenc Launcella Sales Assistant 9U handy Road a Boonton, NJ 07005 Voice 800,336#8575 or 973a263a109U ti Pax 973.257.3024 E -Mad Address salesialmobi'e- vision com Wcb Page w. w muMlc•vivon tom 099 Id WdZe :le OOeZ IT 'Inl' Ci?0E LSZ ELfi : 'ON BNOHd 'oul 'uoTSitl —aI Ig0W : WOJ.3 Ei Segundo Police Department 29 June 2000 348 Maw Street B1 Segundo, CA 90245 Arta Sgt. Elizabeth Gray Sales Rep Hans Berger PHN• (310) 607 -2272 FAX (310) 640 -8648 Quolatiou No. MLO- 062900 -01 Qty Model -P/N Description Unit Price Extended Price 12 System -7 Mobile - Vision In -Car Video System with S 3,645.00 $43,74000 • Color camera with a 16X Optical —128X Digital power zoom leas and a 1 LUX sensitivity, • Overhead control console with a 3" active matrix Color LCD monitor, • Covert back seat microphone, • Digitally encoded wireless microphone, • Lockable, temperature controlled 14 gauge stainless steel trunk - mounted enclosure. • All mounts, wires antenna and hardware included • A one -year parts and labor warranty, Note- The System-7 features aJ VC VCR with "dual - channel audio^ and 4 Video Heads. * Minus set up kit and cable harness. (Pre Shipped) Note: Does not include installation — typically $204. Sales Tax Sale% Tax 8.25% $ 300 71 S3,60855 Total: $ 47,348.55 Other Optional ,UquipMetWAccessones/Servtces 1 SSC Solid State Cooling Option $ 15000 S 15000 1 W M -PRO Additional Digitally Encoded transmitter $ 19500 $ 195.00 l MIC Additional Microphone Cable wAVwdsc-rcen and Clip $ 25.00 $ 2300 1 POUCH Additional Belt Pouches - Black Lcathcr $ 17,50 $ 1750 1 VHS TAPE T -120 VIIS Tapc — Red cassette w /evidence Labohng $ 2.75 $ 2.75 1 BMA Extended Maintenance Agreement (tad Year) $ 250.00 $ 25000 1 Tape Eraser Hand Held — Light Duty (heavy Duty Erasers Avatlabic) S 95.00 S 95.00 Delivery 90 Days or Less ARO Credit Terns Net 30 days Quote vand for 90 Days Slupping & Handling, Included in price Please contact me at (800) 336 -8475 if you have any questions regarding this quote Thank you for considering the purchase of Mobile- Vision In -Cat Video Syminfbi Police Patrol Vehicles, ALyborized By V &.,u do 40, 1447 Valenc Launcella Sales Assistant 9U handy Road a Boonton, NJ 07005 Voice 800,336#8575 or 973a263a109U ti Pax 973.257.3024 E -Mad Address salesialmobi'e- vision com Wcb Page w. w muMlc•vivon tom 099 Id WdZe :le OOeZ IT 'Inl' Ci?0E LSZ ELfi : 'ON BNOHd 'oul 'uoTSitl —aI Ig0W : WOJ.3 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2000 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Resolution accepting the road deed and agreement to convey and claim for payment from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) for the Rosecrans Avenue /Aviation Boulevard intersection improvements. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1 Adopt resolution 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the certificate of acceptance for the road deed on behalf of the City. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: (Background and Discussion begins on the next page......) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1 Resolution for adoption. 2. Road Deed and agreement to convey and claim for payment. 3 Location map. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE Operating Budget: Amount Requested: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: ORIGINATED BY: Q� Date: J L 11 2000 Andres Santamana Director of Public Works REVIEWED BY: f1f Date: Mary Strenn. _ _ aaer Pagel of 2 10 NZOUNCILUULYta01A (Monday7110=400PM) 100 BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The City of Hawthorne is acting as the lead agency for the proposed project to improve the Rosecrans Avenue /Aviation Boulevard intersection. This project is estimated to cost a total of $6.9 million and is fully funded by federal and MTA funds The scope of the project includes right -of -way acquisition costs and construction of street and intersection widening, new traffic signal and street lighting, dual left turn lanes in all directions and dedicated right turn lanes for the Aviation Boulevard traffic. The roadways in all four (4) directions of the intersection up to the next intersecting street (Hawaii Street to the north, Isis Avenue to the east, 33`d Street to the south and Douglas Street to the west) will also be improved in conjunction with this project. The City of Hawthorne anticipates that the project will be under construction in early 2001 A small portion of the right -of -way (880 square feet) to be acquired at the northwest corner of the Rosecrans Avenue /Aviation Boulevard intersection (within El Segundo City limits) is owned by the MTA. The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, which is acting as the right -of -way agent for the project, has prepared the enclosed road deed for acceptance by the City Council by means of adopting a resolution. The MTA's claim for payment of $10,110 00 will be paid by the City of Hawthorne to the MTA, utilizing available project funds There is no expenditure from the City of El Segundo for this purpose. Staff recommends City Council adoption of the resolution accepting the road deed and agreement to convey and claim for payment and, authorization for the Mayor to execute the certificate of acceptance Page 2 of 2 N ICOUNCILWLYI8 01A (Monday 7110/00 4 00 P M ) 101 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ROAD DEED AND AGREEMENT TO CONVEY AND CLAIM FOR PAYMENT FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TO THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, AS FILLOWS. SECTION 1. The City of El Segundo accepts the road deed and agreement to convey and claim for payment (Exhibit A) for Rosecrans Avenue (64) Parcels 64 -23 and 64 -23 D 1 from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority to the City of El Segundo SECTION 2.The Mayor of El Segundo is authorized to execute the certificate of acceptance on behalf of the City SECTION 3 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said City, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of July, 2000 Mike Gordon, Mayor of the City of El Segundo, California ATTEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 1 I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18" day of July, 2000, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APP ED AS TO FORM. ark D. He ey, Atto y 102 �L r� COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803 -1331 Telephone (626) 458 -5100 HARRY W STONE, Director June 22, 2000 Mr. Bellur Devera) City Engineer City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 -3895 Dear Mr Deveraj. ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO P O BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA. CALBFORNIA 91802 -1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE MP -2 M7305970 ROSECRANS AVENUE (64) PARCELS 64 -23 AND 64 -23D.1 -ROAD DEED FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TO CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Enclosed are the fully executed original Road Deed and Agreement to Convey and Claim for Payment from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) to the City of El Segundo for the subject parcels. Please have the Road Deed and Agreement approved and accepted by the City at your next City Council meeting and return them to me along with a warrant in the amount of $10,110 payable to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Upon receipt of the above items, I will record the Deed, pay the MTA, and send you a conformed copy of the Deed with the recording data The Deed, for Parcels 64 -32, 64 -32T 1, 64 -39, and 64- 39T.1, has been sent to the City of Hawthorne for acceptance in a letter similar to this one 103 Mr. Bellur Deveraj June 22, 2000 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (626) 458 -7057 Very truly yours, HARRY W STONE Director of Public Works JOHN MARCONI, Real Property Agent It Acquisition & Revenue Properties Section Mapping & Property Management Division JM:in P2 ltrJM12 Enc. cc- City of Hawthorne (Charles Herbertson) F[Iltl ORIGINAL RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 Attention Andy Santamana, Director of Pubhc Works THIS DOCUMENT IS EXEMPT FROM DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX PURSUANT TO SECTION 11922 OF THE REVENUE & TAXATION CODE THIS DOCUMENT IS EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES PURSUANT TO SECTION 27383 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE Space Above This Lune Reserved for Recorder's Use Assessor's Identification Number 4138- 012 -904 (Portion) ROAD DEED For a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, a public agency organized under the laws of the State of California, successor in interest by operation of law to Los Angeles County Transportation Commission, does hereby grant to the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", an easement for and the right to construct, maintain, operate and use a highway and appurtenant structures in, on, over and across all that real property in the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, described as Parcel 64 -23 in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof Also together with an easement for and the right to construct, maintain, operate and use a drain and appurtenant structures in, on, over and across all that real property in said City, County and State, described as Parcel 64 -23D 1 in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof Also together with the right to enter upon and to pass and repass over and along said easements and rights of way and to deposit tools, implements and other materials thereon by said City, its officers, agents and employees, and by any contractor, its agents and employees engaged by said City, whenever and wherever necessary for the purposes above set forth Dated 1�1, i) ROSECRANS AVENUE (64) Parcels 23 and 23D.1 I.M. 25 -B2 S.D. 2 M7305970 AH MP -9 AH81Rmr64 -Doc23 wpd LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, a public agency I By Velma C Marshall APPROVED AS TO FORM: Director of Real Estate LLOYD W. PELLMAN County Coun e1 BY: Dqfuty nse NOTE: Acknowledgment form on reverse side. 105 ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On /vl� . -4— TT) before me, 6jr L r,. 1 -t the understgtted, personally appeared Y- L i A e` tiLA /2 s i r.L [iiie .rte n e �_ (insert name and title) A L personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the personWwhose nameoe is4ee- subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that4io/she/d ey- executed the same in hrs/her /f§en authorized capacityX, and that by 4HAier/tkerr signature on the instrument the person; or the entity upon behalf of which the personal acted, executed the instrument fs my hand and official seal (Signature) �a lt4. 2ae LL (Name, Typed or Printed) ?PROVED as to form LLOYD W PELLMAN County Counsel a ANWLM MAELL Can WJWffl • 1 12a7PP Low ArgW n Cwntr My Comm. EiiWM Dno 2S, 2000 (Seal) NOTARIES ATTACH ADDITIONAL OR OTHER FORMS, IF REQUIRED Deputy APPROVED as to title and execution, zoo_ DEP.•tRTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Mappmg B Property Management Division DIARTIN 7 YOUNG Supen,umg Title Examiner III NIP -9 AH8/Ro,ci64- Ack -mta CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within deed or grant to the City of El Segundo, a municipal corporation, is hereby accepted under the authority of Resolution No , of the City Council of said City, adopted an 200_, and the Granteeconsents to the recordation of said deed or grant by its duly authorized officer 106 Description of Parcels of Land to be Acquired from Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for and in connection with PuDl1C Road and Highway Purposes ROSECRANS AVENUE (64) (M7305970) Parcel 64 -23: That portion of the southeast quarter of Section 18, Township 3 South, Range 14 West, as shown on map of Subdivision of Part of Rancho Sausal Redondo, in the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, in Case No. 11629 of the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, within the following described boundaries: Beginning at the intersection of the northwesterly line of that certain parcel of land described as Parcel No 1 in deed to County of Los Angeles, for street underpass purposes, recorded as Document No 4671, on February 25, 1964, in Book D2372, page 29 of Official Records, in the office of the Recorder of said County, with the northeasterly boundary of that certain parcel of land described as Parcel 39 in deed to Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, recorded on June 30, 1993, as Official Records Document No. 93- 1256121, in the office of said Recorder; thence North 47 032138" West along said northwesterly line 40.22 feet; thence South 3 046124" East 55.70 feet to said northwesterly line; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line 38.53 feet to the point of beginning. To be known as AVIATION BOULEVARD. Together with an easement for, and the right to construct, maintain, operate, and use, a drain and appurtenant structures in and across the real property in above mentioned City, described as follows Parcel 64 -23D 1 That portion of above mentioned southeast quarter, within the following described boundaries - 1 - 107 EXHIBIT A Beginning at the most northerly corner of above described Parcel 64 -23; thence North 47 032138" West along above mentioned northeasterly boundary of that certain parcel of land described as Parcel 39 a distance of 9.00 feet; thence South 42 027122" West 8.00 feet; thence South 47 032'36" East 17.35 feet to the westerly line of above described Parcel 64 -23; thence North 3 046124" West along said westerly line 11 56 feet to the point of beginning. Also together with the right to enter upon and to pass and repass over and along said easement and right of way and to deposit tools, implements and other materials thereon by said City, its officers, agents and employees, and by any contractor, its agents and employees, engaged by said City, whenever and wherever necessary, for the purposes above set forth DESCRIPT December HARRY W Director BY�� C ION APPROVED 22, 1997 STONE of Pic Works Deputy - 2 - EXHIBIT A ]OR AGREEMENT TO CONVEY AND CLAIM FOR PAYMENT ORIGINAL PROJECT NAME.ROSECRANSAVHNUEf64) PARCELS 64 -23 AND 64-23D 1 FEDERAL PROJECT NO N- 3041[404)CRP- L08g[768] FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the undersigned hereby agrees to grant to the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO the interest(s) in real property described as (FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEE ATTACHED) It is further understood and agreed that if claims are submitted by legal lienholders, said CITY is hereby authorized to honor such claims and deduct the amount thereof from the amount to be paid hereunder to the property owner Said CITY is further authorized to enter such claims on this agreement subsequent to execution by property owner Property owner will be notified of such claims prior to payment The undersigned owner hereby claims and agrees to accept the sum of Ten Thousand One Hundred Ten Dollars ($10,110) as "Just Compensation" for the conveyance of the above-described real property, said sum including compensation for any and all damages occurring to the remainder of grantor's property by reason of its severance from the property conveyed and the construction of the road improvements and any other claim for compensation regarding the project and the acquisition of the described real property The above sum shall be paid within 45 days from the date clear title is vested in said CITY MTA's ACCEPTANCE IS SUBJECT TO MTA's APPROVAL OF LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS. TO Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority IN THE SUM OF Date September 16,t9 99 Social Security Number OR Taxpayer Identification Number 95- 4401975 Signed Btam Title By — Title Address ($10,110 00) VELMA MARSHALL Director of Real Estate P O Box 194 Los Angeles, CA 90053 -2194 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO BY THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE (LEAD AGENCY) Go BRIAN SCANLON, Assistant Deputy Director Mapping & Property Management Division Los Angeles County Department of Public Works P 0 Box 1460 Alhambra, CA 91802 -1460 APPROVED BY THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE (LEAD AGENCY) By Name Title By Name Title JKlb P2IAgreeJM6 Date Date 109 16 IICMCN $ fl- 1C) N m m m Q m � Z m g m F— m U 3 Q i Y 9 Ja. +4 iYJ 0 ,-h b j r ro (rte 46. 4 f , F FIYi 311N36tl ar o[ O Q Q W J m t , w w LI i •I a I � y g w , f R >» 0 L 2 z u 1 r N W I_ w• a c 191111fill 11311 m r n 666 � W o m o o p QOI 10 4 f 1 n 1 � m z ^ 1 a m pp K 0 i � Y a 3 O Z ll. p n T T 1 Q a LL 1 S b Z m (7 3= 7 < < e O N m 3 ggg'� • a. c 191111fill 11311 1 m n 666 � C • o p f 1 n 1 � m z ^ 1 •' 191111fill 11311 - m g 03 a •' 191111fill 11311 - ym� _ .}urn !� 1 � Y a J li IC 1))Ni Dil —� 1 1 SNVW0390V 1 S KOAD DEED ARf 110 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2000 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Adopt plans and specifications for 1999 -00 Slurry seal of various streets — Project No. PW No 00 -11 (estimated cost $105,000.00). RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1 Adopt plans and specifications 2 Authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The Public Works Department has an annual preventative street maintenance program finance by the City's share of gasoline tax revenues. This program involves the application of a very thin asphalt slurry coating on the pavement to seal it from moisture intrusion, thereby extending its useful life and to prevent a more expensive repair in the future Prior to the slurry seal application, the Street Maintenance Division performs pavement repairs and other preparatory work. Staff has prepared plans and specifications for the 1999 -00 Slurry Program for the southwest quadrant of the City's residential area which includes the streets within the area bounded by El Segundo Boulevard, Sheldon Street, Mariposa Avenue and the west city limits. The project also includes Utah Avenue, Alaska Avenue, Hawaii Street and Coral Circle As shown on the enclosed map. The total estimated cost of the project, including design and inspection costs and construction contingencies, is $105,000.00. These funds are budgeted in the adopted fiscal year 1999 -2000 Capital Improvement Program. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Map of area to be slurry sealed FISCAL IMPACT: Capital Improvement Budget: $105,000 Amount Requested: $105,000 Account Number: 106 -400- 8203 -8357 Project Phase: Adopt plans and specification Appropriation Required: No ORIGINATED BY: �Ka }c Date: JUL 112000 Andres Santamana Director of Public Works REVIEWED BY: Date: Mani Rtrann (`ihi Mnn nor N 1COUNCILUULY18 03A (Tuesday 7111100 1 00 P M) 111 w z p 1 V W s n A 7 G _ o � w z � .• 'L�o � o u � E e r N rm.. O S•i'Tie MIAMI CIIT b.""V l I 4YC" ST Ul \ LO M ■ Z [ LIZ LOWA v O MILT. S WRITING I rMRWL fT II[L�JiI� s VWLIW1 ST r B�� `eo CONCORD ST ti Or *.,o 4 Ga'S .! RICHMOND ST u n.wRO It 0 u >i yy — � RI r W •RLN• R �O SHELDON R = a rCkk R OL.NCHC Re SIERRA R CT w 1 _ k . LorR. It `RA Z ILOYRM[f R6 I w Y' MIDLAND ST g � SYW.IOr OIL II��I+II uu ' n "MAIL IV r CLYTLR at I� N PACIFIC ,Mu K� IT MAIL[ w • MELOM R A ph L" I w r CALReRYW y roTT,• F•N.AL LT < r.lNYl Art MSHWSTON ST. Rf1Y1���� I(R�®��gqfR'11RF1I�W��Y•-.W^�L11 r. WK. ,I ELM r C ILLI1100 1LMT Y w WE. W Tff NOW Rlw•H. R N p y LLIYIV90A _ a TIS IRW Z ALL w __ 1fl�f e p WAV �Fj� INlLAt[I 4 n ? n Z rMF r•. Z NpM [ Y[i110 ^ SNElN lSU IS 7 E IS Dour Rf a rr IrRIW '� • ' REeeHOOwc T' > 11 ' 4 � Y wt R CII O .I T MOSRI p M imp AVIATION I(j'jIj' IInI� DL.o G O V p G Wp •"Y« GCGa GGC GGG�' 1 � . 1• w T � H 11 L1 [� L• OG H I No Q SAN OI [00 `� •NO I S CITY OF HAWTHORNE `•T LOS ANGELES COUNTYI 11 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2000 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Adoption of Plans and Specification for the lining of sanitary sewer access structures at various locations — Project PW No. 00 -12 (estimated cost $60,000 00) RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1 Adopt plans and specifications 2 Authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The adopted fiscal year 1999 -2000 Capital Improvement Program includes a project to install lining over the interior brick walls of sanitary sewer access structures. The work includes cleaning and sealing the walls from ground water infiltration and installation of a structural polymer lining over the walls. This is a preventative maintenance effort intended to extend the fife of these structures which were constructed in the mid 1920's Staff has prepared plans and specification for lining approximately 60 structures in the northwest residential area of the City. The project is estimated to cost $60,000 including staff costs for design and construction inspection ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Area map. FISCAL IMPACT: Capital Improvement Program Budget: $60,000 Amount Requested: $60,000 Account Number: 301 -400- 8204 -8393 Project Phase: Adoption of plans and specifications Appropriation Required: No ORIGINATED BY: Date: JUL 112000 ?'�. 12 N 1COUNCILUULY18 0 2 A frW6fty 7/11/001 00 P M) 1 1 1 A m i w. All IAINOOJ 5313'JNL Sol AMA 3NtlON1MVN dp A113 ft TS O I _ V > z 1 CAI t OD31D NVS i Z OJ N :i 9 a a a a : : £ .`. a e 71��Jg s �� I I� Ij� IIj I oI I.I L.I InI I. 3A• nsl � � g g J N I.J LJ LJ LJ UULI L! r Jm �.l 1 I o w OAIV ® Naunnr / L i a r w m /Wxe t110 I.. s W Fil Q 10 1LNYON — p_ o a a i s J a ]A•ofxoolY V a 20 i 8 YNY/I A. 4 SO• 6 j OY A]ln0 Y lt1NiNLLMW = O C 31111 N]LYO Otl13f1 Y It M 6 a MfYN Z �� A•w x1,.1 .1 N9tx V O i Vl W 1 1r 1L AVM • m a 131VAw/ ; wrnv a u 1f ♦ /1]i 61tlOYYY MY = w p •'� r N 'Ji a W W •O]Aln/af 2 4910 SILL M' ]M ttD IQ % if Z.O.M. IOMIII CiM Nl] O I11111IYJ1fyl1 i l/1, anNltw y 3i i•tNtll 1 •1111 /MIDI � AS tlxY011lt] ; ']At NItI V O/I Q <� 1S NO/]YO 0 �]M 1Ltw IS tOM]N ]M 311031I i V M l]Yn•l ^ !f Y]1N10 =ay Em N t� Em 110 wOtr/N11f LY 1 AS OxtIAY•w li C¢ p1, l]NYnoll z 14100 a (ILL-- 1'll ®� if t11w91 O I li 1 lYY SS YYYiIt li NNL OY INOx•l/ i( O • [CIE] EE3 JD��D 1S NOOt]Ni W i j� _ -f rYiYt t� I�1 W B�e if OYtONtlt - N Is is ONOwMYltw /�f �� aka J if '!IY ' N y' / ' Q / EE� U ��e 1/ 01,00X03 O ❑❑ if •1X19YIA if fXI31NN At 11MA tNOI O� • . Y 0 ■ \ LL G • I if LS]Y3TIN :$ ! w Z 1 1 1, X w1, •� of YlZ.r- Y \ LL Ln Q/ t03n =� YL - �40pnYf All* JOVA E`SS O W 3 G a a n o Of a � <+ " z O a u w r V o 114 a EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2000 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Award of contract for Grand Avenue pavement rehabilitation — Project No PW No 99 -06 (contract amount = $129,41163) COUNCIL ACTION: Award contract to the lowest responsible bidder, All American Asphalt, in the amount of $129,411.63 2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the standard Public Works construction agreement after approval as to form by the City Attorney BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The adopted fiscal year 1999 -2000 Capital Improvement Program includes a project to rehabilitate Grand Avenue between Main and Maryland Street. On February 1, 2000, the City Council approved an agreement with Caltrans, which provided for a Caltrans grant of $105,000 for the rehabilitation project (Background and Discussion continues on the next page...) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Location map. FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: Amount Requested: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: $129,411.63 106 -400- 8203 -8454 = $ 65,000 121 -400- 0000 -3990 = $105,000 Award of contract No ORIGINATED BY: am"e a Date: JUL ] 1 2000 REVIEWED BY: 7f4/0o Page 1 of 2 N 1COUNCILUULYI8 04A (ruesday 7 /11/00 2 00 P M) 115 BACKGROUND AND DISCUSISON: (continued) On July 5, 2000 the City Council adopted plans and specification and authorized staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids The scope of the proposed work includes removal of existing deteriorated pavement by grinding, resurfacing with an asphalt concrete overlay and restriping the street On July 5, 2000 the City Clerk received and opened the following bids. All American Asphalt $129,411.63 Sully -Miller Contracting Company $142,401.77 Calmex Engineering, Inc. $142,969.73 Silvia Construction, Inc $143,968.56 Excel Paving Company $144,245.91 All American Asphalt, has satisfactorily completed a recent street rehabilitation project for the City. Staff recommends award of contract to the lowest responsible bidder, All American Asphalt in the amount of $129,411.63 Page 2 of 2 N \COUNCILUULYI8 04A (Tuesday 7111100 2 00 P M) 116 M ©Lj A N u srownll 1 YI O J lAAN1f00 S3130N• SO AM+ 311YON1AV11 110 AIID 3I�� LL��JJ o li 1 YLIR 00110 Ntt y = H 6 11 n3Y „i Q 1{ iL t.fYtL ONYOJ1l.] g ��.LLl,{Y1p. AV Nlf1 M` U ��a YOII • LLL��uJJJ N j IS Npf)Yp e M ),14 C,M 21l1214 q 0 19 9 9 11 11 1YYl.2N V p f !L 1111N11i ¢ _ 11YM1 t3a. Ji o . �O L9 LAM 19 w Ynn Kl1Mt � UIU J W Nou1u• 3) pwl Y 1 1• w D� OY l)wNw011 MM 117 ItY] ° OM a .uw 'p ail a)>YGN B aL Q' < ¢ w t li _ - O r if if 1YYflf NN)1 z 9Y )Y)N•l{ J O NoaVN[ a z � r �1 SL woo. 1wY aa•oeXeeaY J N _ 4 10 e B mowl u .__ BE pY 1)ln0 if YYYOMtt I1N1NY1161 N y` z °m 1 lull Nii1/O i OuliN S l[ if NIYN YNMNiIY ,..' Q n O� _' NO CVa {�• = Y Ne1Y n Y wp9 L ❑���8 u w C if NY02ob, lY 1L ♦NNk a u�� m J 131NNwY1 ; u 11N i • j pM SiM1IW —.-. 01MV Z r $ ooa��e N „ '” `m at sMUNw is 19132 i so ❑ � i w Rl A l ttl J � z fp,aln.ff z V G 6 N A avNi,1 Asia SEA. ©Lj u srownll 3I�� LL��JJ li NC1MINt•N �.aM anNtew y Q 1{ iL t.fYtL ONYOJ1l.] g ��.LLl,{Y1p. AV Nlf1 M` U ��a YOII • LLL��uJJJ N j IS Npf)Yp e M ),14 C,M 21l1214 11 1YYl.2N V �M f !L 1111N11i ¢ _ 11YM1 �O W IN Kl1Mt J W 3) pwl Q OY l)wNw011 ° OM a .uw B aL lwpl A,", u < N 0 li • if if 1YYflf NN)1 z 9Y )Y)N•l{ J O NoaVN[ u �1 SL woo. 1wY N _ ' N .__ BE if YYYOMtt 1. N IfYL� —a1a11 aBB�B l[ if NIYN YNMNiIY ,..' Q n O� _' NO CVa {�• � n Y wp9 ❑���8 if NY02ob, u�� u 11N i • $ ooa��e at sMUNw i so ❑ � u late wool lwpl � c� I of 1flY]llN \ � O N qp 30 1]3n�� u�i p Ya \ :L � V _d.J�v.wwt PNOE`Eri W 0 ; 1 N _ - `0% ♦ p $ a CF Q LL Z u ¢ w a r T a 117 u u a EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2000 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Approval of three -year Memoranda of Understanding between the City of El Segundo and the El Segundo Police Officers' Association RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION- 1) Approve the Agreement, 2) Adopt Resolution Approving Memorandum of Understanding BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: (Please see attached page marked "Background and Discussion ") ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1) Resolution Approving Memorandum of Understanding 2) Agreement prepared by Richard W Kopenhefer, Esq. — McDermott, Will and Emery FISCAL IMPACT: $819,400 over three (3) fiscal years Operating Budget: N/A Amount Requested: N/A Account Number- NIA Project Phase: N/A Appropriation Required: No DATE: July 10, 2000 Assistant s - Mary S enn, City Manager ,1z�d ACTION TAKEN: H (Y 118 Background and Discussion: In March 2000, staff and representatives of the El Segundo Police Officers' Association began meeting and conferring, pursuant to Sections 3500 et. seq of the California Government Code, for the purpose of obtaining a labor agreement. Agreement was reached during the last week of June. The following is an outline of the significant provisions of the recommended Agreement • Three -Year MOU; • 3 % @50 PERS Retirement Benefits, effective FY 2000/2001; • Employees may sell back to the City 50% of their annual vacation accrual effective FY 2000/2001, • Motorcycle Officer pay differential increased to 6% of base salary, effective FY 2000!2001, • Special Assignment Pay Differential for K -9 Officers, Field Training Officers, Detectives, various Task Forces and Administrative assignments increased to 4.5 %, effective FY 2000/2001, • Longevity Achievement Pay — 5% after five years sworn law enforcement experience and 10% after fifteen years experience, effective January 1, 2001, • Complete Comprehensive MOU by September 1, 2000. CJ) /Iqf RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, AND THE EL SEGUNDO POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the City has met and conferred In good faith with representatives of the El Segundo Police Officers' Association, and WHEREAS, discussions which have taken place in the meet and confer process have resulted in a mutually agreeable Memorandum of Understanding between the City of El Segundo and this Association, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of El Segundo as follows, SECTION 1. That staff is authorized to implement all terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Understanding (entitled "agreement ") between the City of El Segundo and The El Segundo Police Officers' Association SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said city, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said city, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of July 2000. Mike Gordon, Mayor of the City of EI Segundo ATTEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18th day of July, 2000, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk AP ED AS TO FORM ark Hensley, Cit§ Attorney Z— RESOLUTION NO APPROVE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - ESPOA Page No I 120 Tentative Agreement Between the City of El Segundo ( "City ") and the Police Officer's Association ( "Union ") 1 The term of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) shall commence on July 1, 2000 and end on June 30, 2003. 2 The City and Union shall incorporate the terms of this tentative agreement into the draft comprehensive MOU, attached as "Exhibit A," and finalize all changes to the draft comprehensive MOU by September 1, 2000 3 Effective July 1, 2000, the City shall take action necessary to implement the 3% @ 50 PERS Retirement for all affected employees as soon as possible 4 Effective July 1, 2000, the City will allow employees in the Union to sell back 50% of their annual vacation accrual. This will be allowed once during the first year of the agreement between July 1, 2000 and December 31, 2000 and once per calendar year thereafter 5 Effective July 1, 2000, the City will pay Motor officers a differential pay equal to 6% above gross regular pay step E of a Police Officer without incentives; and the City will pay Task Force officers, Detectives, Administrative officers, K -9 officers, and Field Training Officers a differential pay equal to 4 5% above gross regular pay step E of a Police Officer without incentives 6 Effective January 1, 2001, the City shall pay union employees with 5 years of sworn law enforcement service a 5% salary increase above their current step and grade and the City shall pay union employees with 15 years of sworn law enforcement service a 10% salary increase above their current step and grade These increases are contingent upon the union employee receiving a satisfactory evaluation 7 The City will provide a letter confirming that union employees will be eligible to participate in the Fire Safety Group 0005 dental plan offered by the City, and any increase in the cost above the cap will be borne by the employee The Union and City have agreed regarding the impact of certain "downstream" costs associated with the amendment of the City's contract with CalPers as required by this MOU See Attachment A 9 The City agrees to reasonably cooperate with William Fleming in order to permit him to avail himself of the retirement enhancement provided by this MOU Fleming and/or the Association agree to bear any costs associated with such efforts 121 For the Police Officer's Association• Original to be signed on 7/13/2000 Rob Wexler Johl Sellens, President Original to be signed on 7/13/2000 Calvin Smith, Vice President Original to be signed on 7/13/2000 Carlos Mendoza, Board Member For the City. Rick Kopenhefer For the City Original to be signed on 7/13/2000 Rick Kopenhefer Bret Plumlee, Finance Director Original to be signed on 7/13/2000 Jack Wayt, Police Captain COVI, cll� Ron Green, Police Captain Bob Hyland, Senior H Resources Analyst 122 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2000 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION, Approval of three -year Memoranda of Understanding between the City of El Segundo and International Firefighters' Association (I A F.F.), Local 3682 RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1) Approve the Agreement, 2) Adopt Resolution Approving Memorandum of Understanding BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: (Please see attached page marked "Background and Discussion ") ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1) Resolution Approving Memorandum of Understanding 2) Agreement prepared by Richard W Kopenhefer, Esq. — McDermott, Will and Emery FISCAL IMPACT: $755,200 over three (3) fiscal years. Operating Budget: Amount Requested: N/A Account Number: N/A Project Phase: N/A Appropriation Required: No Assistant DATE: July 10, 2000 DATE: r 7 Mary S n, City Manager //d ACTION TAKEN: S LP ia3 Background and Discussion: In March 2000, staff and representatives of the I.A.F.F., Local 3682 (El Segundo Firefighters' Association) began meeting and conferring, pursuant to Sections 3500 et seq. of the California Government Code, for the purpose of obtaining a labor agreement Agreement was reached during the last week of June The following is an outline of the significant provisions of the recommended Agreement. • Three -Year MOU, • 3 % @55 PERS Retirement Benefits, effective June 1, 2001, • Reform of "No Reduction /Maintenance of Existing Benefits" clause in MOU, • '/2 % increase in incentives for Firefighters assigned to Paramedic service (from 12 '/� % to 13% for first year Paramedics and from 15 '/2 % to 16% for subsequent years of service); • Increase in number of paid shifts allowed for the conduct of union business from three (3) days annually to seven (7) days annually, effective July 2000 • Establishes Longevity Achievement Program — 6% for every 6'Y2 years of continuous service (i.e.: 6% after 6 'Y2 years, 6% more after 13 years, 6% more after 19'/2 years of service and 6% more after 26 years of service.) • Increases the number of times the union is allowed to meet while employees are on duty from eight (8) times annually to ten (10) times annually between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. • Requires that employees who are on duty on Federal, State or Municipal election days, and who wish to vote, cast absentee ballots, as allowed by current State law; • Employees shall receive a 1.71% cost -of -living adjustment during the third year of the agreement, effective July 1, 2002, • Complete Comprehensive MOU by September 1, 2000 OD is y/ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, AND INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS' (I.A F.F.), LOCAL 3682 WHEREAS, the City has met and conferred in good faith with representatives of I A F F Local 3682 (El Segundo Firefighters' Association), and WHEREAS, discussions which have taken place in the meet and confer process have resulted in a mutually agreeable Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Et Segundo and this Association, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of El Segundo as follows, SECTION 1. That staff is authorized to implement all terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Understanding (entitled "agreement ") between the City of El Segundo and I A F F Local 3682 SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said city, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said city, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of July 2000. Mike Gordon, Mayor of the City of El Segundo ATTEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18th day of July, 2000, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk rk Hensley, ity Attorney RESOLUTION NO APPROVE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - LSFFA Page No I 125 Tentative Agreement Between the City of El Segundo ( "City") and the International Firefighters' Association, Local 3682 ( "Union ") 1 The term of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) shall commence on July 1, 2000 and end on June 30, 2003. 2 The City and Union shall incorporate the terms of this tentative agreement into the draft comprehensive MOU, attached as Exhibit A (which the parties acknowledge has not yet received final legal review), and finalize all changes to the draft comprehensive MOU by September 1, 2000 3 Effective July 1, 2000, the City shall implement a Longevity Achievement/Educational Incentive Program, as proposed in Exhibit B Exhibit B shall be incorporated into the draft comprehensive MOU 4 Effective July 1, 2000 City and Union agree to substitute the "Maintenance of Existing Benefits" clause, as stated in Article 1.08 of the current MOU between the City and the El Segundo Police Officers' Association, for the current "No Reduction" clause, as stated in Article 1 06 of the draft comprehensive MOU between the City and the Union, as reflected on Exhibit C 5 Effective July 1, 2000, the City shall convert the premium for each employee's Long Term Disability (LTD) benefits to salary in order that these payments shall be reportable to the taxing authorities as ordinary income of the employees 6 Effective July 1, 2000, the City shall increase the salaries for Firefighters assigned to Paramedic Service from twelve and one -half (12 5 %) percent to thirteen (13 %) percent during the first year of service and from fifteen and one -half (15 5 %) percent to sixteen (16 %) percent during the second year and all subsequent years of service 7 Effective July 1, 2000, the parties shall modify Article 1.09 of the draft comprehensive MOU as indicated on Exhibit D 8 Effective July 1, 2000, the Union shall modify Article 3 08 of the draft comprehensive MOU to allow ten (10) union meetings per year which may be taken between 0730 to 1130 9 Effective July 1, 2000, covered employees assigned to work on the day of any Federal, State or Municipal elections and who desire to vote shall be obligated to cast absentee ballots whenever legally available, as described on Exhibit E i ?r 10 The parties agree to implement the provisions of Exhibit B to provide that the anniversary dates of employees who commenced their service with the City as CETA employees shall be the dates they commenced their active service with the City, as opposed to the 'Permanent Employment Dates' when their compensation was fully paid by the City 11 The City shall amend its current contract with CALPERS in order that the 3 % @55 PERS Retirement Program shall be in place for all affected employees on or before June 1, 2001 The parties have agreed regarding the treatment of certain "downstream" costs of this benefit, and of the educational incentive described in paragraph #3, in Exhibit F 12 Effective July 1, 2002, the City shall increase salaries for all employees by 1 71% For the IAFF, Local 3682 Kevin Rehm, President ti ck Slover, 1 ice President Jo i Bibee, Vice President Mark Lees, Sedr6tary For the City Richard W Kopenhefer — d�; � � Craig ;.4 _,/ Jeff r wart, Assistant City Manager 127 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE. July 18, 2000 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: New Business AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Request for City Council to (1) approve funding in the amount of $190,000 for the development and Implementation of a city operated animal control program, (2) approve a resolution amending Section 8 12 040 of the El Segundo Municipal Code authorizing the increase of licensing fees, and (3) authorize use of the additional licensing revenue to offset the cost of this program RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve funding and authorize Staff to proceed with development and implementation of program Approve Resolution to amend 8.12.040 ESMC to allow for dog registration at an increased fee schedule. Authorize use of revenue to offset the increase in the animal control budget. BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION* Los Angeles County Animal Care and Control is unable to provide animal control services at levels that are acceptable to all residents City staff has been examining other options such as the development and Implementation of a City operated and funded animal control program (Continued Page 2) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Staff Report Fee schedule of surrounding cities Resolution to the El Segundo City Municipal Code Section 8 12.040 FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: $ 48,000 Amount Requested: $142,000 Account Number: Current 001 -400- 3101 -6271 Proposed 001 -400 -3108 Project Phase: Phase One — Development / Implementation Appropriation required: ORIGINATED- DATE, July 12, REVIEWED BY, DATE. July 12, 2000 Mary St n, City Manager 16 28 BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION (Continued) Under this proposal, animal licensing would need to be Increased to $30.00 for spayed or neutered dogs and $60.00 for all others This step will enable the city to offset the budget Increase necessary for a city funded animal control program Current animal control budget $ 48,000 Proposed I" year operating budget- $190,000 Proposed 2"d year operating budget- $120,000 Expected licensing revenue for 3000 animals ranges from- $ 90,000 - $180,000 129 FEE SCHEDULE Spaved /Neutered Non - spayed /neutered Los Angeles $10.00 $30.00 Hermosa Beach $10.00 $2000 Lawndale $10.00 $2000 Manhattan Beach $1600 $32.00 Redondo Beach $2000 $40.00 El Segundo $30.00 $60.00 0 City of El Segundo INTER - DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE July 10, 2000 TO: Mary Strenn, City Manager FROM: Tim Gnmmond, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Animal Control Program Proposal PROBLEM L A County Animal Care and Control can not adequately provide animal control services to the levels demanded by the city Due to complaints from residents regarding the service provided by L A County, the condition of the Carson animal housing facilities, and the rate of euthanasia at the Carson facility, staff was directed to research the option of a city sponsored animal control program SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ANIMAL CONTROL PROGRAM The purpose of this proposal is to provide the residents of El Segundo superior animal control services combined with the highest quality care and housing available This will accomplish two goals 1) It will increase the rate of adoptions of stray or abandoned animals picked up within El Segundo 2) it will reduce the amount of complaints regarding response times, care of animals and the euthanasia rate of the animals taken to the Carson, L A. County facility The planned program would entail the hiring of an additional Police Service Officer (PSO) for animal control Duties would include all existing PSO duties plus the following animal control related tasks Set up office space and cage area Prepare and maintain computer for licensing database Input all information gathered at the June 14th rabies clinic Set up procedure within city website for lost or stray animals taken to SPCA Set up procedure manual for city animal control Set up procedure for getting pictures to city cable channel Prepare press releases advertising the new animal control program Respond to all animal control issues to include enforcement of municipal codes in tit Tim Grimmond Juiy10,2000 Page 2 • reference to animals, licensing, pick up of stray or dead animals, respond to calls for service, respond to complaints taken on a 24hr recorder • Dunng a four week period the primary and backup officers will canvass neighborhoods for unlicensed animals • Prepare weekly activity reports and quarterly reports to be presented to council • Organize and participate in dog training classes for residents- this could be used as incentive to owners who have received citations but would rather participate in training than pay fines • Prepare and present classes at the elementary school regarding dog and animal safety • Perform parking enforcement Other PSO's will be trained in animal control for back up and on call services nights and weekends. Licenses would be available through the animal control officer, assistants and Finance Records will be kept in a program within the animal control officers computer as well as the Finance Department An annual rabies and licensing clinic will be held in June Housing of all animals would be accomplished through the SPCA on Yukon in Hawthorne, We would not be using L A County for any animal control services The animal control officer will transport animals to SPCA or, in emergencies, to temporary cages in the city until they can be transported to the SPCA Specific issues associated with this program are listed and addressed below Personnel Considerations Hire one additional Police Service Officer (PSO) to be utilized as an animal control officer with a schedule to be flexible and set at a later date. Human Resources is being consulted on working out of classification, financial considerations, and /or changing duties Three additional PSO's, and possibly a cadet, will be trained for "on call ", fill in, after hour, vacation and holiday service. A cost comparison will be done in reference to paying a PSO "on -call" status rather than contracting with L A County Animal Control for after hours and weekend service This may be more cost effective Contract Considerations • L A City Animal Control is not interested in contracting with the City • SPCA has agreed in wnting to provide housing services and has quoted us $25,000 annually • Manhattan is not interested in contracting animal control services to other cities • Lawndale may be interested and will provide us with a quote when we formally request specific services This may be cost prohibitive due to the requirement of providing Lawndale with a truck and equipment. Lawndale contracts with L A County for after hours service (11.00 P.M to 6.00 A.M.) and contracts with the SPCA for housing. Their animal control officers pickup any animals taken to the Carson Shelter in the A M. and transfer them to SPCA We want to try to avoid this 1,12 Tim Gnmmond July 10, 2000 Page 3 Manhattan Beach P D contracts with Bay Animal Hospital for veterinary services will need to contract with a local vet for after hours service SPCA requires that we have vet services when they are closed Our K -9's contract with Emergency Pet Clinic of the Southbay in Torrance Equipment Needs • Truck • Redesigned truck bed with permanent cages installed • Kennel cages • Animal capture and control equipment including traps, gloves, nooses, comealongs, euthanasia kit • Citations printed for payment to City of El Segundo under specified municipal codes • Uniforms for control officer • MDC for truck to allow monitor dispatching to officer in the field • Licenses for animals • Cell phone • Mobile Video Camera • Digital Camera Office Space and Equipment Options for office space will depend upon placement of temporary holding cages Considerations include *Water tower area. *City maintenance facility bay *Downstairs office off briefing room within Police Department *City Hall downstairs facility Old L A Impact area *Recreation park. Computer and program for tracking citations, licensing and complaints Miscellaneous office equipment- see budget breakdown Budgeting Considerations • One additional PSO position with benefits • One part -time PSO position to cover call outs, equivalent to a 5 position • One truck equipped with cages and lighting MDC /Radio for dispatching calls • Vehicle operating costs • Mobile Video Camera • Digital Camera • Cell Phone with yearly service • Uniforms • All necessary animal control equipment for 4 people • Contract with SPCA for housing • Veterinary Contract $55,817 $27,908 $47,000* $10,000* $ 1,500 $ 5,000* $ 700* $ 1200 $ 500* $ 2000* $25,000 $ 3,000 t 33 Tim Gnmmond July 10, 2000 Page 4 Training for animal control officer and three relief officers $ 4,000' (Euthanasia certification 20 hrs, Animal Behavior 8 hrs 832 P C certification 40 hrs, Wildlife and Reptile Training 8 hrs) Office equipment Computer /Pnnter $ 3000' Licensing computer program $ 300' Desk $ 300' File Cabinet $ 110' Chair $ 200" Misc, office supplies $ 200` • Metal dog tag licenses 3000 $ 300 • Printing and supply costs for triplicate licensing papers $ 500 • Printing and supply cost for citations $ 200 'Approximate total startup costs, $190,000 Approximate annual budget requirements $120,000 Revenue generating options available • Citations Licensing Training classes given by K -9 Officers and or animal control officers Proposed implementation tasks This program will take approximately 4 months, following budget approval, to become fully operational Until that time, L A County Animal Control has agreed to proceed with the current level of service Agenda item with final animal control program proposal Rabies License Clinic with L.A County - Start database for our own licensing program Rewrite PSO job description and prepare for council approval Post new position and hire Police Service Officer Establish base of operation Order equipment including truck (120 day delivery) Send Animal Control Officer and back up PSO's to training Prepare Animal Control Procedural Manual Send out press releases Contact residents and issue new El Segundo Licenses Cancel County Services 134 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ANIMAL LICENSING FEES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Whereas, Section of the El Segundo Municipal Code authorizes the City Council to set by resolution fees relating to animal control, and Whereas, the City Council has determined that the public interest, convenience and necessity require the adoption of the proposed fees. Section 1 Pursuant to Section 8 12.040 of the El Segundo Municipal Code, the City Council hereby sets the annual dog license fees at $60.00 for unaltered dogs and $30 00 for spayed or neutered dogs. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution PASSED AND APPROVED this 18TH of July, 2000 Mike Gordon, Mayor RESOLUTION NO DOG LICENSE I EES PAGE NO I 135 ATTEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cathy Domann, Deputy City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of 2000 and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Cathy Domann, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. Mark Ile ley, City Attorney�— RESOLUTION NO DOG LICENSE FEES PAGE NO 2 136 17 Announcement of appointment of Mike Gordon as alternate delegate to the South Bay Cities Council of Governments. 1/ 1 .17