Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
1999 NOV 16 CC PACKETW!M!• �•
AGENDA
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street
The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items.
Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City- related business that is within the jurisdiction of the
City Council and/or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portion of the Meeting. Additionally, the
Public can comment on any Public Hearing item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing portion of such item. The time limit for
comments is five (5) minutes per person.
Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state: Your name and residence and the organization you
represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits.
Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's
Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2:00 p.m. the prior Tuesday). The request must include a brief
general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be
permitted during meetings if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not
exceed five (5) minutes in length.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk 607 -2208.
Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16,1999 - 7:00 P.M.
Next Resolution # 4140
CALL TO ORDER
Next Ordinance # 1314
INVOCATION — Bishop Lloyd Carlson, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
POSTING OF COLORS AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Boy Scout Troop 773
PRESENTATIONS —
(a) Commendation to Troop 773 Scout, Russell Fields for attaining the status of Eagle Scout.
(b) El Segundo - Guaymas Sister City Association, 1999 International Goodwill and
Understanding Award to Total Baseball for acceptance by Hazen McIntyre, Owner.
(c) Commendation to St. Anthony's Catholic School, Jazzercize, Summit Commercial, I Can
Too Sport, MOMS' Club and Key Club for the Thanksgiving Food Drive for CASE.
03
Public Hearing on a Conditional Use Permit to allow kennel (overnight boarding) operations
at an existing dog day care facility; and, certification of a Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impacts. (Environmental Assessment EA-487 and Conditional Use Permit
CUP 99 -3.) Address: 202 Illinois Street, #B. Applicant: John Corrales, Grateful Dogs,
P.D.S.. Inc. Property Owner: Stanley Novak
Recommendation —
1) Open public hearing;
2) Discussion;
3) Reading of Resolution by title only;
4) By motion, adopt Resolution approving the project; and /or,
5) Other possible action /direction.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS —
Request for City Council to approve the purchase of a Wireless Voice Radio system, hardware
and software, from Motorola as the next phase in the development of the El Segundo Public
Safety Communications Center project. Previously approved funding for the project will be
used for this equipment purchase
Recommendation — Approve the purchase of a Wireless Voice Radio system.
4. Request for the City Council to authorize staff to present a proposal to provide dispatch
services on a contractual basis to potential customer cities
Recommendation — Authorize Staff to formally offer a proposal for dispatch services to
potential customer cities.
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - NONE
Consideration of the re- naming of the stretch of beach extending from Grand Avenue to the El
Porto ietty. "El Segundo Beach."
Recommendation —
1) Discussion and possible action; and
2) Direct staff to proceed with appropriate documentation to California State Lands
Commission for official naming of El Segundo Beach.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a call for
discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business.
6. Warrant Numbers 2506318- 2506609 on Register No. 3 in total amount of $950,081.01, and
Wire Transfers in the amount of $307,111.25.
Recommendation - Approve Warrant Demand Register and Authorize staff to release.
Ratify: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or
agreements; emergency disbursements and/or adjustments; and wire transfers from
10/22/99 to 11105199.
7. City Council meeting minutes of November 3 1999
Recommendation - Approval.
1110
MEMORIALS — In memory of Dorothy Pedego
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act
(Government Code Sec. 54960, et m.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property
Negotiator; and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation; and/or discussing
matters covered under Government Code section 54957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with the City's Labor
Negotiators; as follows:
Continuation of matters listed on the City Council Agenda for 5:00 p.m., November 16, 1999 under "Closed
Session" (if needed).
REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required)
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED:
DATE:
TIME:
NAME
111699ag
(17
(d) Presentation by West Basin Municipal Water District and Chevron Products
Comnanv on a Reverse Osmosis Pipeline Project.
Recommendation — Receive report,
The Honorable Mayor Mike Gordon
Members of City Council
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Re: 1999 Annual Holiday Parade/Santa's Village/Treelighting
Dear Mayor Gordon and Council Members:
On behalf of the Chamber of Commerce Holiday Parade Committee, we are requesting support and
sponsorship by the City of El Segundo for the 360' Annual Holiday Parade and the related activities
outlined below.
• The annual Tree Lighting ceremony will take place at the Civic Center Plaza on Thursday,
December 9, from 5:00 to 5:30 pm. (An attachment shows last year's setup.)
• This year's Parade will be held on Sunday, December 12, from 2:00 to 4:00 pm.
• Santa's Village has been scheduled from 12:00 to 2:00 pm at the Civic Center Plaza the same day,
prior to the parade.
For the Tree Lighting, we are requesting the use of the City's PA system, microphones, three risers,
podium, eight tables, 80 chairs, one large coffee pot, two 100' extension cords, and a canopy. We also
ask that a piano be moved from El Segundo High School.
For the Parade, we are requesting City sponsorship through traffic control and monitoring along the
parade route, posting street closure, barricades, and the procurement and set -up of equipment such as the
Grandstand, with 80 chairs for dignitary seating and the PA system for the parade announcer.
In addition, we are requesting that City permit fees be waived for all three events and that the City would
arrange for trash collection along the parade route following the event.
Please accept our invitation to join us at our Annual Holiday Mixer at First Coastal Bank, 275 Main
Street, on December 9. It begins at 5:30 pm immediately following the Tree Lighting.
We would also like to invite the City Council and other dignitaries to ride in the Parade and to participate
in the Tree Lighting. Further information will be provided to you early in December.
Thank you for the support and sponsorship that you have extended to the Chamber and this community
tradition over the years. We look forward to working with you during the upcoming holiday season.
Sincerely,
J� ath 44k)
Kathryn Lourtk
Executive Director
A�M,cnt
09
EL SEGUNDO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE • 427 MAIN STREET • EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA 90245 • (310) 322 -1220 • FAX (310) 322 -6880
J
-LEI
d
F
0
s°- x X
14
xx
r-
on
m A f�
�3
I
> L
10
INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM
INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM
November 8, 1999
TO: Mary Strenn, City Manager
FROM: Greg Johnson, Recreation and Parks Director
Page 1 of 1
SUBJECT: STAFF SUPPORT TO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE HOLIDAY PARADE
COMMITTEE
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the letter from the
Chamber of Commerce to Mayor Gordon outlining the 1999 Annual Holiday
Parade /Santa's Village /Tree lighting festivities. The Parks Division will be
able to assist with the logistical support referred to in the memo.
Department staff are familiar with the tree placement, lighting ceremony, and
parade and will have the appropriate sound equipment, chairs, risers, podium,
chairs, tables, extensions cords, coffee pot, and canopy as requested.
If there is any other support required from our department to ensure a
successful event, just let me know.
I
81e://C: \temp\INTER.htm 11/8/99
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: November 16, 1999
Continued Public Hearing on a proposed Specific Plan ( "Aviation Specific Plan "), Development Agreement, and
amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Code and Zoning Map to change the existing Land Use Designation and
Zoning from Open Space (O -S) to Aviation Specific Plan (ASP). Generally located at 700 South Douglas Street. The
Speck Plan area will be used for a public self - storage facility. The Development Agreement would provide for a road
easement for the Douglas Street extension and the lease of parkland on Washington and Illinois Street.
(Environmental Assessment EA -427, General Plan Amendment GPA 97-4, Zone Change 97 -3, Zone Text Amendment
98 -6, Environmental Assessment EA -470, and Development Agreement 99 -1). Property owner: Southern California
Edison.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Open Continued Public Hearing;
2) Discussion;
3) Reading of Resolution by title only;
4) By motion, Adopt Resolution approving the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for the project;
5) First reading of Ordinance approving the Aviation Specific Plan (by title only);
6) Schedule second reading and Adoption of Ordinance on December 7, 1999; and /or,
7) Other possible action /direction.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
Approval of the four (4) following separate items is proposed:
A. Adoption of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts (EA -427 & EA -470) for the Aviation Specific Plan,
Development Agreement and other associated applications to permit the development of a 377 -unit 66,000 square
foot self- storage facility on a Southern California Edison right -of -way at 700 South Douglas Street;
B. Adoption of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 97-4) to amend various sections of the Land Use and the Open
Space and Recreation Elements to re- designate the subject property from Open Space to Aviation Specific Plan;
C. Amendments to the Zoning Code (ZTA 98-6) and Zoning Map (ZC 97 -3) to reflect the change in zoning from Open
Space (O -S) to Aviation Specific Plan (ASP) due to the creation of Aviation Speck Plan; and,
D. Approval of a Development Agreement (DA 99 -1) to allow the City to acquire a road easement across the Aviation
Specific Plan for the future construction of an extension of Douglas Street in order to connect the two dead ends
of the street adjacent to the subfect property. Through the Development Agreement the City would also obtain the
right to lease 3.66 acres of Edison right-of-way adjacent to Washington and Illinois Streets between Holly and
Walnut Avenues for park purposes.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. (draft) City Council Resolution No.
2. (draft) City Council Ordinance No.
Agreement) _ with attachments (including Aviation Specific Plan and Development
3. Planning Commission Staff Report and Attachments, October 28, 1999.
4. Planning Commission Minutes, (adopted) October 14 and (draft)October 28, 1999.
5. (adopted) Planning Commission Resolution No. 2405 without attachments.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ORIGIN ED:
Date: November 9, 1999
Jame nsen, Interim Director of Planning and Building Safety
REVI WE Y:
Date:
Mary St .nn .�
P :%PMectSW 26- 4501EA- 42TEA427 8 470.ais -3.doc
1
EA- 427,EA470, GPA 9-4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98-6, DA 99 -1 Page 2
City Council Staff Report
November 16, 1999
DISCUSSION:
This item was continued from the City Council meeting on November 3, 1999, because there were a few provisions
in the proposed Development Agreement which still required further negotiations and revisions before the City Council
could take final action. These were technical issues regarding the definitions and extent of the easements, details for
the proposed $250,000 bond, and the term of the proposed park lease. The City is also in the process of conducting
environmental testing of the Douglas Street extension area.
The negotiations related to these outstanding issues have now been completed and the proposed Development
Agreement is ready for Council considerations. Staff also expects the results of the soil testing to be completed prior
to the Public hearing and will provide a copy of the report prior to the meeting under a separate cover.
As part of its commitments under the Development Agreement, the City will need to acquire from Eaton Corporation
approximately 4,534 square feet of property to provide Southern California Edison with an ingress and egress
easement. Additionally, as design of the Douglas Street extension progresses, it may be necessary for the City to
obtain property from additional land owners located in the improvement area.
On October 28, 1999, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the proposed project. In its
deliberations the Commission raised concerns with the aesthetics of the proposed buildings, particularly as viewed
from the Douglas Street Greeniine Station platform. The Commission suggested that additional landscaping be
provided at the south end of each storage building to break -up the mass of the buildings. The Developer agreed to
work with staff to provide additional landscaping, which would not interfere with the overhead transmission lines that
run the length of the property. A revision to the Specific Plan to implement this recommendation is depicted on Page
14 of the Draft Aviation Specific Plan.
The Planning Commission also expressed concern that the Development Agreement (Section 7f) only provides the
City six months from the effective date of the Agreement to enter into a park lease agreement for the three SCE
properties to be used for park purposes. The Commission felt this might not give the City enough time to complete
the necessary documentation to ensure the City received the right to use the properties. Staff believes that considering
the fact that the City has a current park lease agreement in place with SCE for other parkland, and the new agreement
will be very similar, the new agreement for the new parklands should not take the full six months to execute. Section
9 of the Development Agreement also requires the City and SCE to work together in a timely manner to implement
the Development Agreement provisions.
A more complete project description, analysis, and background information is included in the accompanying Planning
Commission Staff Report and selective (non - duplicative) attachments, which were previously distributed to the City
Council on October 22, 1999.
13
p:lprojecrsW2G450%A- 42TEA427 8 470.ais -ldoc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT — 427 (EA427) AND
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT —470 (EA470),
CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, FOR
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 974, ZONE CHANGE 97-
3, ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT 98-6, AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT 99 -1 FOR THE AVIATION SPECIFIC PLAN
AT 700 SOUTH DOUGLAS STREET. (PROPERTY
OWNER: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON)
WHEREAS, Environmental Assessments (EA -427 and EA470), including Draft Initial
Studies and Negative Declarations of Environmental Impacts for the proposed use, have been
prepared and circulated to all interested parties, staff, and affected public agencies for review and
comment in the time and manner prescribed by law; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposals and supporting evidence
with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act, State
CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No. 3805); and,
WHEREAS, on October 14 and 28, 1999, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to
law, duly advertised public hearings on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350
Main Street, and notices of the public hearings were given in the time, form and manner
prescribed by law; and adopted Resolution No. 2432 recommending approval of the proposed
project; and,
WHEREAS, on November 3 and 16, 1999, the City Council did hold, pursuant to law, a
duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main
Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by
law; and,
WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against the findings
of Environmental Assessment EA -427, EA -470, GPA 974, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, and DA 99 -1;
and,
WHEREAS, at said hearings the following facts were established:
The Specific Plan area site is located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo
approximately one -half (1/2) mile to the west of the San Diego Freeway [Interstate405 (I-
405)].
2. The Specific Plan project area is approximately 5.4 acres (235,224 square feet).
14
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING EA427. EA -470, GPA 974,
ZC 97 -3. ZTA 98.6, and DA 99.1
11/4/99 8:00 a.m. PAGE NO. 1
3. The Specific Plan project is generally bounded on the north by light industrial land uses, on
the south by Santa Fe railroad tracks and the MTA Green Line right -of -way, on the east by
Aviation Boulevard and on the west by Douglas Street. Local jurisdictions bordering or
near the site include the City of Manhattan Beach located immediately south of Rosecrans
Avenue and the City of Hawthorne locate to the east of Aviation Boulevard.
4. The Specific Plan site is currently developed with several abandoned greenhouse
structures, and Southern California Edison transmission towers, and was previously used as
a commercial wholesale landscape nursery.
5. The topography of the Specific Plan site is level and soils conditions are suitable for the
existing development.
6. Plant species present on the Specific Plan site are those that are commonly used for
landscaping purposes or which have adapted to urban environments. There is no known
rare or endangered animal species associated with the Project site, or project locale.
7. The Specific Plan site and immediate project locale, contains no known significant cultural,
historical, or scenic aspects.
8. The area surrounding the Specific Plan project site is highly urbanized. Land uses consist
of medium scale office, commercial, light - industrial, warehouse, research and
development, hotel, restaurant, and retail uses.
9. There are residential uses located approximately 150 feet from the eastern boundary of the
Specific Plan area, on the east side of Aviation Boulevard in the City of Hawthorne.
10. The Specific Plan project site is only visible from Douglas Street on the west, Aviation
Boulevard from the east and from the elevated Douglas Street MTA Green line Station
11. The City's General Plan designates the Specific Plan project site for Open Space. The
project site is zoned Open Space (O -S) Zone. The proposed Specific Plan area will be
designated Aviation Specific Plan (ASP) in the General Plan and Zoning Code.
12. Southern California Edison is the property owner for three parcels of land which would be
leased to the City for park purposes, include: 1) 0.61 acres located on Washington Street
between Walnut Avenue and Sycamore Avenue; 2) 2.05 acres located on Illinois Street
between Mariposa Avenue and Pine Avenue; and, 3) 1 acre located on Illinois Street
between Holly Avenue and Pine Avenue. These properties are zoned Open Space (O -S)
and are currently undeveloped.
13. The proposed terns of the Development Agreement would grant the City a License to use
the above referenced properties for park purposes for a term concurrent with the City's
current park license with Southern California Edison for the use of other Edison properties
for park purposes. The existing park license will expire in 2006. The proposed
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING EA427, EA470, GPA 974,
ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98.6, and DA 99.1
11/4/99 8:00 a.m. PAGE NO.2 ,a C
Development Agreement would also allow for two five -year extensions of the park license.
The City would have six months from the approval of the Development Agreement to
exercise the lease offer.
14. The proposed Development Agreement provides for SCE to grant an easement to the City
for public roadway purposes to facilitate the construction of an extension of Douglas Street
adjacent to the Specific Plan area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after considering the above facts, the
testimony presented at the public hearings, and study of proposed. Environmental Assessment
EA -427 & -470 (EA -427 & EA -470) GPA 97-4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, and DA 99 -1, the City
Council makes the following findings and approves the Mitigated Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts of proposed Environmental Assessment EA-427 and EA -470:
ENVIRONM NTAL ASSES MENT
1. The Draft Initial Studies were made available to all local and affected agencies and for
public review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law. The Initial Studies
concluded that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the
environment, and Mitigated Negative Declarations of Environmental Impact will be
prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);
2. That when considering the whole record, there is no evidence that the proposed
modifications to the project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife
resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends, because the project is in a built -
out urban environment; and,
That the City Council authorizes and directs the Director of Planning and Building Safety
to file with any appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and de minimum
finding pursuant to AB 3158 and the California Code of Regulations. Within ten (10)
days of the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declarations of Environmental Impacts,
the owner shall submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of $25.00 required by the County
of Los Angeles for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of
Determination. As approved in AB 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA will not be
met and no vesting shall occur until this condition is met and the required notices and
fees are filed with the County.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTEN y
That the proposed use is consistent with the following General Plan goals, policies, and
objectives.
A. The proposed General Plan Land Use Designation for the Specific Plan site, as
well as the proposed zoning, is Aviation Specific Plan (ASP). The Aviation
Specific Plan designation is compatible with the surrounding Light Industrial and
Urban Mixed -Use South land use designations.
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING EA427, EA -470, GPA 974,
ZC 97 -3, ZTA 9", wo DA 99 -1
11/4/99 9:00a.MPAGENO.3'1 16
B. The proposed Aviation Specific Plan designation is designed to allow a maximum
floor area (FAR) ratio of 0.22 While this would permit a greater amount of
development than the existing Open Space land use designation, the total build
out of the plan area would be approximately 66,000 square feet which is an
insignificant increase in density compared to the anticipated total buildout of
approximately 56,000,000 square feet envisioned in the 1992 General Plan.
Findings must be made that the project is in conformance with the goals, policies
and objectives of the General Plan in order to approve the project. Interpretation
of conformity with the applicable provisions of the General Plan is a policy
decision that is at the discretion of the Planning Commission and the City
Council.
C. The proposed project is in conformance with many General Plan goals, policies
and objectives related to Economic Development, Land Use, Circulation and Air
Quality. The following Economic Development objectives and policies apply; ED
1 -1.1, ED 1 -1.2, ED 1 -2, ED 1 -2.1, ED 1 -2.2, and ED 1 -2.3, which relate to
prioritizing economic development, diversification of an economic base,
expanding the retail and commercial base, targeting industries that balance
economic development and quality of life goals, and balancing development with
resource and infrastructure capacity.
D. Many Land Use goals, policies and objectives apply including; LU 4, LU 4 -1.1,
LU 4 -1.4, LU 4 -3.6, LU 4-4, LU 4-4.4, LU 4-4.6, LU 4.5, LU 5 -3.1, LU 7 -1.2 and
LU 7 -2.3. These issues relate to providing a stable tax base, providing
landscaping, promoting commercial uses adjacent to the Green line, attracting
clean industrial uses, revitalizing industrial areas, encouraging alternative
transportation modes, providing good accessibility to transportation routes, and
requiring adequate public facilities and underground utilities.
E. Circulation Element policies and objectives also apply to the proposal including;
C1 -1.2, C1 -1.4, CI -1.5, C1 -1.13, C1 -1.15, C 1 -2.1, C2 -1.1, C 2 -3.3, C 3 -1, C 3-
1.1, C 3 -1.2, C 3 -1.5, C 3 -1.7, and C 4 -1.2. These policies identify the need to
aggressively implement the Master Plan roadway improvements, construct
missing roadway links, upgrade roadways to Circulation Element standards,
provide full examination of project traffic impacts and complete mitigation,
protect adequate right -of -way for future improvements, develop a hierarchy and
street classification system correlated to capacity and function, encourage the
development of pedestrian linkages to the Green Line stations, design facilities for
easy pedestrian access, evaluate circulation system impacts, full mitigation of all
project - related circulation impacts, integrate transportation with land uses and
surrounding environments, require developers to pay for mitigation measures,
provide for adequate pedestrian and bicycle access, and evaluation of project
impacts on CMP routes.
LurION NO.
APPROVING EA4R 27OEA -470. G A 974,
ZC 97 -3, ZTA 99.6, and DA 99.1
11/4/99 8:00a.MPAGENO.4
17
F. The policies and objectives which apply to the proposed project are contained
within the Air Quality Element including; AQ 7 -1.1 and AQ 12 -1.2, which relate
to requiring conformance with the SCAQMD PMto standards and encouraging
energy conservation features in new building design.
G. The final policies and objectives which apply to the proposed project are
contained within the Open Space and Recreation Element including: OS 14, OS1-
4.1, and OS1 4.2, which are devoted to developing utility transmission corridors
for active and passive open space and recreational uses. These objectives and
Policies suggest working with Southern California Edison to protect and maintain
existing linear parks and landscaping within utility rights -of -way. Since this
Specific Plan area is not currently used as a park or is not landscaped for a passive
use, conversion of the property would not tend to contradict Policy OS1-
4.1.However, Policy OS1 -4.2, encourages the City to continue to expand
landscaping and recreational uses along the utility rights -of -way. Approval of the
proposed project would appear to diminish a future opportunity for a 5.4 acre
utility corridor to be used for landscaping or recreational use in a way that would
be an amenity for the community, although there is no residential community in
El Segundo within the Specific Plan vicinity. However, approval of the
Development Agreement will provide the City the opportunity to increase the
inventory of park and recreation facilities in the residential portion of the City by
leasing three properties totaling 3.66 acres of SCE utility corridor for park
purposes. These properties are currently vacant parcels which provide only a
limited amenity to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council approves
the Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts of proposed Environmental
Assessment EA-427 and EA -470, GPA 97-4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, and DA 99 -1, subject to the
following conditions:
1 • Prior to approval of the building plans, the owner shall develop plans, which indicate that
the proposed mini - storage facility is in substantial conformance with the Aviation
Specific Plan and plans approved and on file with the Department of Planning and
Building Safety. Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred
to the Director of Planning and Building Safety for a determination regarding the need for
Planning Commission review of the proposed modification.
2. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the mini- storage facility, the owner
shall pay a one -time Library Services Mitigation Fee of $0.03 per gross square foot of
building and storage unit floor area.
3. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the mini - storage facility, the owner
shall pay a one -time Fire Services Mitigation Fee of $0.14 per gross square foot of
building and storage unit floor area.
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING EA427, EA-470, GPA 97.4,
ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98.6, and DA 99.1
11/4/99 8:00 a.m. PAGE NO.5 18
4. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the mini- storage facility, the owner
shall pay a one -time Police Services Mitigation Fee of $0.11 per gross square foot of
building and storage unit floor area.
5. Prior to approval of the building plans, the owner shall submit plans which demonstrate
conformance with the elements outlined in the memos from the Police Department, dated
February 4 and October 6, 1998, which are on file in the Planning Division. The security
measures shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or
implemented prior to operation, as appropriate.
6. Prior to approval of the building plans, the owner shall submit a Fire/Life Safety Plan to
the Fire Chief which includes, but is not limited to, the following:
A. Fire lane signage;
B. Fire lane accessibility.
All Fire/Life Safety Plan requirements must be installed and operational, and any
required easements or documents recorded, prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy,
7. The owner shall pay the City Attorney's costs for preparing or reviewing the fire lane
access easement, or any such easements or agreements required.
8. A Landscaping and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted by the owner to the Director of
Planning and Building Safety, Director of Recreation and Parks, and Police Chief prior to
approval of the building plans. Landscaped areas shall be provided with a permanent
automatic watering or irrigation system and shall be permanently maintained in a neat
and clean manner. The owner, if feasible, shall incorporate provisions for the use of
reclaimed water in the Landscaping and Irrigation Plan. The Plan shall be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety, Director of Recreation and
Parks, and Police Chief, and installed per the approved plans by the owner prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
9. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the owner shall submit a Master Sign
Plan to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area and the criteria objectives of the
General Plan and Aviation Specific Plan, as well as to ensure that signs do not impede
traffic or pedestrian safety. The Master Sign Plan shall be subject to the approval of the
Director of Planning and Building Safety and Police Chief and all signs shall be installed
per the approved plan prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
10. During construction, the entire project site shall be enclosed by a six -foot high chain link
fence. Gates for site fencing shall not open over sidewalk/public right -of -way. A fencing
plan shall be submitted by the owner and reviewed and approved by the Director of
Planning and Building Safety prior to installation.
APPROVING EA-4427. O
-4 0 G A 97.4,
ZC 97 -3, ZTA 9", and DA 99 -I
1114199 8:00 a.m. PAGE NO.6
19
11. All work within the City public right -of -way shall be in accordance with the latest edition
of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and City of El Segundo
Standard Specifications. No work shall be performed in the public right -of -way without
first obtaining a Public Works permit.
12. Prior to approval of the building plans, plans shall indicate that all proposed utilities shall
be placed underground to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The owner shall assume
the costs for the relocation of all utilities, including but not limited to, light poles,
electrical vaults, and fire hydrants which are affected by the proposed project.
13. Encroachment permits must be obtained from the Engineering Division of the Public
Works Department for demolition haul -off. Permits must be obtained at the same time the
permit for demolition is issued. An encroachment permit for grading is also required
when import or export of dirt exceeds fifty (50) cubic yards. Demolition and grading may
be listed on one encroachment permit.
14. Prior to approval of the building plans, plans shall show the location and design of all
proposed trash enclosures to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building
Safety and the Police Chief. Plans shall also indicate that the trash area will incorporate
adequate space for the collection of recyclable materials.
15. If new sewer laterals are required and constructed in the public right -of -way they shall be
a minimum of six (6) inches inside diameter. Material shall be "vitreous clay pipe ". Each
lateral shall have a six (6) inch clean-out brought to grade at the property line and
securely capped. A B9 size box shall be placed around the C.O. for protection. The box
shall have a cover emblazoned with the word "sewer ". If in a traffic. area, cover shall be
traffic approved. All planned sewer connections shall be checked for elevation prior to
starting construction. Existing sewer laterals shall be plugged at the sewer mainline and
capped at the property line. Existing six (6) inch wyes may be reused if approved by the
Director of Public Works.
16. No material storage is allowed in the public right -of -way except by permit issued by the
Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. If material storage is allowed in
the public right -of -way it shall be confined to parkway areas and street parking areas, as
long as safe and adequate pedestrian and vehicular passage is maintained at all times.
Storage beyond these areas in the public right -of -way requires prior approval of the
Public Works Department and shall be limited to a maximum period of 24 hours.
17. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, new curbs, sidewalk, driveway approaches, wheelchair
ramps and A.C. pavement, including alleys, shall be constructed/reconstructed as
required by the Director of Public Works. Existing driveways and other concrete work
not to be incorporated into the construction shall be removed and replaced with standard
curb and sidewalk.
18. Should any previously unrecorded archeological or cultural resources be encountered
during construction of the project, all work will be stopped and the Department of
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING EA -427, EA470, GPA 97 4.
ZC 97 -3. ZTA 98fi, and DA 99-1 .v e� n
1114/99 8:00 a.m. PAGE NO. 7 C. t
Planning and Building Safety will be notified immediately. At the owner's expense a
qualified archeologist will be consulted to determine the potential significance of the
find, and his findings shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Building Safety
prior to the commencement of work.
19. The owner shall submit the appropriate documentation to show conformance with or
exemption from the State Water Quality Control Board's National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for construction related stormwater run -off to the
Director of Public Works prior to the approval of the building plans.
20. During construction dust control measures shall be required in accordance with the City's
Dust Control Ordinance. Grading will be discontinued during first -stage smog alerts and
suspended during periods of high wind (i.e. over 15 miles per hour). All hauling trucks
shall have loads covered or wetted and loaded below the sideboards to minimize dust.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that according to the El Segundo Municipal Code, a
copy of this Resolution shall be mailed to the owner at the address shown on the application and
to any other person requesting a copy of same.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of November 1999.
ATTEST: Mike Gordon, Mayor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole
number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. _ was
duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the
City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 16th day of November, 1999, and the same
was so passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
APP VIED AS TO FORM:
ark D. H +s e Alto ey
RESOLUTION No.
APPROVING EA427, EA470, GPA 974,
ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98.6, and DA 99-I
11/4/99 8:00 a.m. PAGE NO.9 - 2
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EL SEGUNDO CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT 974, ZONE CHANGE 97 -3, ZONE
TEXT AMENDMENT 98-6, AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT 99 -1 FOR THE AVIATION SPECIFIC PLAN
AT 700 SOUTH DOUGLAS STREET. (PROPERTY
OWNER: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON)
WHEREAS, Environmental Assessments (EA -427 and EA -470), including Draft Initial
Studies and Negative Declarations of Environmental Impacts for the proposed use, have been
prepared and circulated to all interested parties, staff, and affected public agencies for review and
comment in the time and manner prescribed by law; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the applications and supporting
evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act,
State CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No. 3805); and,
WHEREAS, on October 14 and 28, 1999, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to
law, duly advertised public hearings on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350
Main Street, and notices of the public hearings were given in the time, form and manner
prescribed by law and adopted Resolution No. 2432 recommending approval of the
Environmental Assessment; and,
WHEREAS, on November 3 and 16, 1999, the City Council did hold, pursuant to law, a
duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main
Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by
law; and,
WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against the findings
of Environmental Assessment EA -427, EA -470, GPA 97-4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, and DA 99 -1;
and,
WHEREAS, at said hearings the following facts were established:
The Specific Plan area site is located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo
approximately one -half (1/2) mile to the west of the San Diego Freeway [Interstate -405 (I-
405)].
2. The Specific Plan project area is approximately 5.4 acres (235,224 square feet).
3. The Specific Plan project is generally bounded on the north by light industrial land uses, on
the south by Santa Fe railroad tracks and the MTA Green Line ri ght -of- -way, on the east by
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVING EA427. EA-470, GPA 974,
ZC 97 -3. ZTA 99-6, and DA 99-I
11/M 2:00p.m. PAGE NO.I
22
Aviation Boulevard and on the west by Douglas Street. Local jurisdictions bordering or
near the site include the City of Manhattan Beach located immediately south of Rosecrans
Avenue and the City of Hawthorne locate to the east of Aviation Boulevard.
4. The Specific Plan site is currently developed with several abandoned greenhouse
structures, and Southern California Edison transmission towers, and was previously used as
a commercial wholesale landscape nursery.
5. The topography of the Specific Plan site is level and soils conditions are suitable for the
existing development.
6. Plant species present on the Specific Plan site are those that are commonly used for
landscaping purposes or which have adapted to urban environments. There is no known
rare or endangered animal species associated with the Project site, or project locale.
7. The Specific Plan site and immediate project locale, contains no known significant cultural,
historical, or scenic aspects.
8. The area surrounding the Specific Plan project site is highly urbanized. Land uses consist
of medium scale office, commercial, light - industrial, warehouse, research and
development, hotel, restaurant, and retail uses.
9. There are residential uses located approximately 150 feet from the eastern boundary of the
Specific Plan area, on the east side of Aviation Boulevard in the City of Hawthorne.
10. The Specific Plan project site is only visible from Douglas Street on the west, Aviation
Boulevard from the east and from the elevated Douglas Street MTA Green line Station
11. The City's General Plan designates the Specific Plan project site for Open Space. The
project site is zoned Open Space (O -S) Zone. The proposed Specific Plan area will be
designated Aviation Specific Plan (ASP) in the General Plan and Zoning Code.
12. Southern California Edison is the property owner for three parcels of land which would be
leased to the City for park purposes, include: 1) 0.61 acres located on Washington Street
between Walnut Avenue and Sycamore Avenue; 2) 2.05 acres located on Illinois Street
between Mariposa Avenue and Pine Avenue; and, 3) 1 acre located on Illinois Street
between Holly Avenue and Pine Avenue. These properties are zoned Open Space (O -S)
and are currently undeveloped.
13. The proposed terms of the Development Agreement would grant the City a License to use
the above referenced properties for park purposes for a term concurrent with the City's
current park license with Southern California Edison for the use of other Edison properties
for park purposes. The existing park license will expire in 2006. The proposed
Development Agreement would also allow for two five -year extensions of the park license.
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVING EA427, EA470. GPA 974,
ZC 97 -3, ZTA 9". and DA 99 -1
11/9199 2:00 p.m. PAGE NO.2
~ 23
The City would have six months from the approval of the Development Agreement to
exercise the lease offer.
14. The proposed Development Agreement provides for SCE to grant an easement to the City
for public roadway purposes to facilitate the construction of an extension of Douglas Street
adjacent to the Specific Plan area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that after considering the above facts, the
testimony presented at the public hearings, and study of proposed Environmental Assessment
EA -427 & -470 (EA -427 & EA -470) GPA 97-4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, and DA 99 -1, the City
Council makes the following findings and approves GPA 97-4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, and DA 99-
1,
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
That the proposed use is consistent with the following General Plan goals, policies, and
objectives.
A. The proposed General Plan Land Use Designation for the site, as well as the
proposed zoning, is Aviation Specific Plan (ASP). The Aviation Specific Plan
designation is compatible with the surrounding Light Industrial and Urban Mix
Use South land use designations.
B. The proposed Aviation Specific Plan designation is designed to allow a maximum
floor area (FAR) ratio of 0.3. While this would permit a greater amount of
development than the existing Open Space land use designation, the total build
out of the plan area would be approximately 70,000 square feet which is a
insignificant increase in density compared to the anticipated total buildout of
approximately 56,000,000 square feet envisioned in the 1992 General Plan.
Findings must be made that the project is in conformance with the goals, policies
and objectives of the General Plan in order to approve the project. Interpretation
of conformity with the applicable provisions of the General Plan is a policy
decision that is at the discretion of the Planning Commission . and the City
Council.
C. The proposed project is in conformance with many General Plan goals, policies
and objectives related to Economic Development, Land Use, Circulation and Air
Quality. The following Economic Development objectives and policies apply; ED
1 -1.1, ED 1 -1.2, ED 1 -2, ED 1 -2.1, ED 1 -2.2, and ED 1 -2.3, which relate to
prioritizing economic development, diversification of an economic base,
expanding the retail and commercial base, targeting industries that balance
economic development and quality of life goals, and balancing development with
resource and infrastructure capacity.
ORDINANCE NO,
APPROVING EA427, EA-470, GPA ii —4,
ZC 97 -3, ZTA 984, and DA 99.1
11/8/99 2:00 p.m. PAGE NO.3
..Q' 24
D. Many Land Use goals, policies and objectives apply including; LU 4, LU 4 -1.1,
LU 4 -1.4, LU 4 -3.6, LU 44, LU 4-4.4, LU 44.6, LU 4.5, LU 5 -3.1, LU 7 -1.2 and
LU 7 -2.3. These issues relate to providing a stable tax base, providing
landscaping, promoting commercial uses adjacent to the Green line, attracting
clean industrial uses, revitalizing industrial areas, encouraging alternative
transportation modes, providing good accessibility to transportation routes, and
requiring adequate public facilities and underground utilities.
E. Circulation Element policies and objectives also apply to the proposal including;
CI -1.2, C1 -1.4, C1 -1.5, C1 -1.13, C1 -1.15, C 1 -2.1, C2 -1.1, C 2 -3.3, C 3 -1, C 3-
1.1, C 3 -1.2, C 3 -1.5, C 3 -1.7, and C 4 -1.2. These policies identify the need to
aggressively implement the Master Plan roadway improvements, construct
missing roadway links, upgrade roadways to Circulation Element standards,
provide full examination of project traffic impacts and complete mitigation,
protect adequate right -of -way for future improvements, develop a hierarchy and
street classification system correlated to capacity and function, encourage the
development of pedestrian linkages to the Green Line stations, design facilities for
easy pedestrian access, evaluate circulation system impacts, full mitigation of all
project - related circulation impacts, integrate transportation with land uses and
surrounding environments, require developers to pay for mitigation measures,
provide for adequate pedestrian and bicycle access, and evaluation of project
impacts on CMP routes.
F. The policies and objectives which apply to the proposed project are contained
within the Air Quality Element including; AQ 7 -1.1 and AQ 12 -1.2, which relate
to requiring conformance with the SCAQMD PM10 standards and encouraging
energy conservation features in new building design.
G. The final policies and objectives which apply to the proposed project are
contained within the Open Space and Recreation Element including:OS 14, OS1-
4.1, and OS14.2, which are devoted to developing utility transmission corridors
for active and passive open space and recreational uses. These objectives and
policies suggest working with Southern California Edison to protect and maintain
existing linear parks and landscaping within utility rights -of -way. Since this
Specific Plan area is not currently used as a park or is not landscaped for a passive
use, conversion of the property would not tend to contradict Policy OS1-
4.1.However, Policy OS14.2, encourages the City to continue to expand
landscaping and recreational uses along the utility rights -of -way. Approval of the
proposed project would appear to diminish a future opportunity for a 5.4 acre
utility corridor to be used for landscaping or recreational use in a way that would
be an amenity for the community.
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVING EA427, EA-470, GPA 974,
ZC 97.3, ZTA 98.6, and DA 99.1
I IAM 2:00 p.m. PAGE NO.4
25
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the City Council approves
Environmental Assessment EA-427 & -470 (EA -427 & EA -470), GPA 97-4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98-
6, and DA 99 -1, and adopts changes to the El Segundo Municipal Code and General Plan as
follows:
SECTION 1. Section 20.16.020 of Chapter 20.16, Title 20, of the El Segundo Municipal
Code is amended to read as follows:
20.16.020 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONES.
In order to classify, regulate, restrict and segregate the uses of lands and
buildings, to regulate and restrict the height and bulk of buildings, to regulate the
area of yards and other open spaces about buildings and to regulate the density of
population, the City has adopted the following specific plan areas which function
as the Zoning Code for specific areas.
Smoky Hollow Specific Plan
There are four (4) classes of use zones intended to be used within the
boundaries of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan. These zones include:
GAC - Grand Avenue Commercial Zone.
MDR - Medium Density Residential Zone.
SB - Small Business Zone.
MM - Medium Manufacturing Zone.
2. 124e Street Specific Plan
There is one (1) use zone intended to be used within the boundaries of the
Aviation Specific Plan. This zone is:
124'" SP - 124'" Street Specific Plan Zone.
Aviation SRecific Plan
There is one (1) use zone intended to be used within the boundaries of the
Aviation Specific Plan. This zone is:
ASP - Aviation Specific Plan Zone.
The foregoing Zones are separate Zones and shall not be deemed to be more
restrictive or less restrictive than any other Zone, but shall be limited to the uses
permitted in the specified Zone.
SECTION 2. The Aviation Specific Plan is hereby adopted as set forth in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVING EA -427, EA -470, GPA i7-4,
ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98-6, and DA 99.1
I UM 2:00 p.m. PAGE NO. S
26
SECTION 3. The Land Use designations ( "Commercial Designations" subsection) and
the proposed Land Use Plan ( "Southeast Quadrant' subsection) of the Land Use Element are
hereby amended to reflect the change of a portion of the Southern California Edison right -of -way
at 700 South Douglas Street from Open Space to Aviation Specific Plan. The corresponding
changes to the Land Use Element as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference, are also hereby approved.
SECTION 4. The 1992 General Plan Summary of Existing Trends Buildout (Exhibit
LU -3) of the Land Use Element is hereby amended to reflect the change of a portion of the
Southern California Edison right -of -way at 700 South Douglas Street from Open Space to
Aviation Specific Plan. The corresponding changes to the Land Use Element as set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are also hereby approved.
SECTION 5. The General Plan Land Use Map is hereby changed to reflect the change
for a portion of the Southern California Edison right -of -way at 700 South Douglas Street from
Open Space to Aviation Specific Plan. The corresponding changes to the Land Use Map as set
forth in Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are also hereby
approved.
SECTION 6. The Summary of Existing Conditions and Private Facilities sections of the
Open Space and Recreation Element are hereby amended to reflect the change of a portion of the
Southern California Edison right -of -way at 700 South Douglas Street from Open Space to
Aviation Specific Plan. The corresponding changes to the Land Use Element as set forth in
Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are also hereby approved.
SECTION 7. The Private Open Space and Recreational Facilities Lands Map (Exhibit
OS -2) of the Open Space and Recreation Element is hereby amended to eliminate a portion of
the Southern California Edison right -of -way at 700 South Douglas Street from Private Open
Space and Recreational Facilities Lands Map. The corresponding changes to the Open Space and
Recreation Element as set forth in Exhibit F, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference, are also hereby approved.
SECTION 8. The current Zoning Map is hereby amended to reflect a change for a
portion of the Southern California Edison right -of -way at 700 South Douglas Street from Open
Space to Aviation Specific Plan. The corresponding changes to the Zoning Map as set forth in
Exhibit G, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are also hereby approved.
SECTION 9. The Development Agreement by and Between the City of El Segundo and
Southern California Edison is hereby adopted as set forth in Exhibit H, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVING EA427, EA470, GPA 97-4,
ZC 97 -3, ZTA 99.6, and DA WI
11/8199 2:00 p.m. PAGE NO.6
27
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the City Council approves
GPA 974, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, and DA 99 -1, subject to the following conditions:
Prior to approval of the building plans, the owner shall develop plans, which indicate that
the proposed mini- storage facility is in substantial conformance with the Aviation
Specific Plan and plans approved and on file with the Department of Planning and
Building Safety. Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred
to the Director of Planning and Building Safety for a determination regarding the need for
Planning Commission review of the proposed modification.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the mini - storage facility, the owner
shall pay a one -time Library Services Mitigation Fee of $0.03 per gross square foot of
building and storage unit floor area.
3. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the mini- storage facility, the owner
shall pay a one -time Fire Services Mitigation Fee of $0.14 per gross square foot of
building and storage unit floor area.
4. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the mini- storage facility, the owner
shall pay a one -time Police Services Mitigation Fee of $0.11 per gross square foot of
building and storage unit floor area.
5. Prior to approval of the building plans, the owner shall submit plans which demonstrate
conformance with the elements outlined in the memos from the Police Department, dated
February 4 and October 6, 1998, which are on file in the Planning Division. The security
measures shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or
implemented prior to operation, as appropriate.
6. Prior to approval of the building plans, the owner shall submit a Fire/Life Safety Plan to
the Fire Chief which includes, but is not limited to, the following:
A. Fire lane signage;
B. Fire lane accessibility.
All Fire/Life Safety Plan requirements must be installed and operational, and any
required easements or documents recorded, prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
7. The owner shall pay the City Attorney's costs for preparing or reviewing the fire lane
access easement, or any such easements or agreements required.
8. A Landscaping and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted by the owner to the Director of
Planning and Building Safety, Director of Recreation and Parks, and Police Chief prior to
approval of the building plans. Landscaped areas shall be provided with a permanent
automatic watering or irrigation system and shall be permanently maintained in a neat
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVING EA-427, EA-470, GPA 974,
ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98.6, and DA 99 -1
1118/99 2:00 p.m. PAGE NO.7
28
and clean manner. The owner, if feasible, shall incorporate provisions for the use of
reclaimed water in the Landscaping and Irrigation Plan. The Plan shall be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety, Director of Recreation and
Parks, and Police Chief, and installed per the approved plans by the owner prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
9. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the owner shall submit a Master Sign
Plan to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area and the criteria objectives of the
General Plan and Aviation Specific Plan, as well as to ensure that signs do not impede
traffic or pedestrian safety. The Master Sign Plan shall be subject to the approval of the
Director of Planning and Building Safety and Police Chief and all signs shall be installed
per the approved plan prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
10. During construction, the entire project site shall be enclosed by a six -foot high chain link
fence. Gates for site fencing shall not open over sidewalk/public right -of -way. A fencing
plan shall be submitted by the owner and reviewed and approved by the Director of
Planning and Building Safety prior to installation.
11. All work within the City public right -of -way shall be in accordance with the latest edition
of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and City of El Segundo
Standard Specifications. No work shall be performed in the public right -of -way without
first obtaining a Public Works permit.
12. Prior to approval of the building plans, plans shall indicate that all proposed utilities shall
be placed underground to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The owner shall assume
the costs for the relocation of all utilities, including but not limited to, light poles,
electrical vaults, and fire hydrants which are affected by the proposed project.
13. Encroachment permits must be obtained from the Engineering Division of the Public
Works Department for demolition haul -off. Permits must be obtained at the same time the
permit for demolition is issued. An encroachment permit for grading is also required
when import or export of dirt exceeds fifty (50) cubic yards. Demolition and grading may
be listed on one encroachment permit.
14. Prior to approval of the building plans, plans shall show the location and design of all
proposed trash enclosures to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building
Safety and the Police Chief. Plans shall also indicate that the trash area will incorporate
adequate space for the collection of recyclable materials.
15. If new sewer laterals are required and constructed in the public right -of -way they shall be
a minimum of six (6) inches inside diameter. Material shall be "vitreous clay pipe ". Each
lateral shall have a six (6) inch clean-out brought to grade at the property line and
securely capped. A B9 size box shall be placed around the C.O. for protection. The box
shall have a cover emblazoned with the word "sewer ". If in a traffic area, cover shall be
traffic approved. All planned sewer connections shall be checked for elevation prior to
ORDINANCE NO. _
APPROVING EA -427, EA-470, GPA 97 -4,
ZC 97.3, ZTA 98-6, and DA 99.1
11/8/99 2:00 p.m. PAGE NO.8
29
starting construction. Existing sewer laterals shall be plugged at the sewer mainline and
capped at the property line. Existing six (6) inch wyes may be reused if approved by the
Director of Public Works.
16. No material storage is allowed in the public right -of -way except by permit issued by the
Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. If material storage is allowed in
the public right -of -way it shall be confined to parkway areas and street parking areas, as
long as safe and adequate pedestrian and vehicular passage is maintained at all times.
Storage beyond these areas in the public right -of -way requires prior approval of the
Public Works Department and shall be limited to a maximum period of 24 hours.
17. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, new curbs, sidewalk, driveway approaches, wheelchair
ramps and A.C. pavement, including alleys, shall be constructed/reconstructed as
required by the Director of Public Works. Existing driveways and other concrete work
not to be incorporated into the construction shall be removed and replaced with standard
curb and sidewalk.
18. Should any previously unrecorded archeological or cultural resources be encountered
during construction of the project, all work will be stopped and the Department of
Planning and Building Safety will be notified immediately. At the owner's expense a
qualified archeologist will be consulted to determine the potential significance of the
find, and his findings shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Building Safety
prior to the commencement of work.
19. The owner shall submit the appropriate documentation to show conformance with or
exemption from the State Water Quality Control Board's National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for construction related stormwater run -off to the
Director of Public Works prior to the approval of the building plans.
20. During construction dust control measures shall be required in accordance with the City's
Dust Control Ordinance. Grading will be discontinued during first -stage smog alerts and
suspended during periods of high wind (i.e. over 15 miles per hour). All hauling trucks
shall have loads covered or wetted and loaded below the sideboards to minimize dust.
SECTION 10. This Ordinance shall become effective at midnight on the thirtieth (30)
day from and after the final passage and adoption hereof.
SECTION 11. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
ordinance; shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original ordinances of said City;
shall make a note of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the meeting at which the
same is passed and adopted; and, shall within 15 days after the passage or adoption thereof cause
the same to be published or posted in accordance with the law.
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVING EA-427, EA-470, GPA 971,
ZC 97 -3, ZTA 986, rod DA 99-1
11/8/99 2:00 p.m. PAGE NO.9
30
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 71° day of December. 1999.
Mike Gordon, Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 1
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole
number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Ordinance No. was
duly introduced by said City Council at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of November, 1999, and
was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by
the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 7th day of December, 1999, and the
same was so passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
rk D. Hett City Attorney
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROV NG EA427, EA-470, GPA 974,
ZC 97 -3, ZTA 96.6, aid DA 99.1
11/9/99 2:00 p.m. PAGE N0. 10
31
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT
AVIATION SPECIFIC PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA -427
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA 97 -4
ZONE CHANGE 97 -3
PREPARED FOR
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
350 MAIN STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA 90245
(310) 322 -4670
APPLICANT
EVEREST STORAGE
199 SOUTH LOS ROBLES AVENUE, SUITE 440
PASADENA, CA 91101
(818) 585 -5920
SEPTEMBER 28, 1999
3"
AVIATION SPECIFIC PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction
A. Specific Plan Boundary ........................................................................ ............................... l
B. Specific Plan Scope and Goals ............................................................. ............................... l
II. Overview of the Specific Plan Study Area
A. The Community .....................................................................................
..............................8
1. Demographics ...................................................................................
..............................8
2. Location Context ..............................................................................
..............................8
3. Economic Context ............................................................................
..............................8
B. Existing Land Uses ................................................................................
..............................9
C. Existing Utilities and Infrastructure .......................................................
..............................9
1. Water Service ...................................................................................
..............................9
2. Fire Protection ..................................................................................
..............................9
3. Sewer Service ..................................................................................
.............................10
4. Gas/Electric/Telephone Service .......................................................
.............................10
5. Solid Waste Disposal .......................................................................
.............................10
D. Potential Changes ................................................................................. .............................10
III Policies Standards and Guidelines
A. Economic Development .......................................................................
.............................11
B. Land Use ..............................................................................................
.............................12
C. Circulation ............................................................................................
.............................12
D. Aesthetics .............................................................................................
.............................13
E. Landscaping .........................................................................................
.............................13
F. Public Safety ........................................................................................
.............................15
G. Signage .................................................................................................
.............................15
IV Administration
A. Introduct ion ........................................................................................ ...............................
16
B. Specific Plan Administ ration ................................................................ .............................16
1. Administrative Determinations ........................................................ .............................16
2. Land Use Determinations ................................................................ .............................16
3. Development Standards Determinations ......................................... .............................16
4. Administrative Use Permit Filing and Review Process ................... .............................16
5. Decision .......................................................................................... .............................16
6. Findings for Approval ..................................................................... .............................16
7. Expeditious Review Process ............................................................ .............................16
8. Planning Commission Review ....................................................... ...............................
16
9. Appeals ............................................................................................ .............................17
33
C. California Environmental Quality Act Compliance ............................... .............................17
V Development Standards
A. Permitted Use ....................................................................................... .............................18
B. Development Standards ........................................................................
.............................18
1. General Provisions ..........................................................................
.............................18
2. Lot Area ..........................................................................................
.............................18
3. Height ..............................................................................................
.............................18
4. Setbacks ...........................................................................................
.............................19
5. Lot Frontage ..................................................................................
............................... 19
6. Building Area ..................................................................................
.............................19
7. Walls and Fences .............................................................................
.............................19
8. Access ...........................................................................................
............................... 19
9. Parking and Loading .....................................................................
............................... 19
10. Hours of Operation .........................................................................
.............................19
ii 1 34
EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1
Regional Location ..................................................
..............................3
Exhibit2
Local Vicinity .........................................................
..............................4
Exhibit3
Legal Description ...................................................
..............................5
Exhibit 4
Development Plan A ..............................................
..............................6
Exhibit 5
Development Plan B ...............................................
..............................7
iii 35
AVIATION SPECIFIC PLAN
I. INTRODUCTION
A. SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY
The Aviation Specific Plan area is located in the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles,
California (Exhibit 1). El Segundo is situated 15 miles southwest of downtown Los Angeles. It is
located south of Los Angeles International Airport, east of the Pacific Ocean, north of the City of
Manhattan Beach, and west of the City of Hawthome.
The Aviation Specific Plan area is a roughly rectangular 5.4 acre site located adjacent to the Aviation
Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue intersection in the southeast corner of the City. It is a narrow
corridor of land oriented in a generally northwest to southeast diagonal between Aviation Boulevard
and Douglas Street (Exhibit 2). A legal description of the Aviation Specific Plan property is
provided in Exhibit 3. The elevated MTA Green Line and the at -grade Santa Fe Railroad track border
the Specific Plan area on the southwest. Historically, the Specific Plan area has served as a right of
way for Southem California Edison transmission lines and towers and is designated Open Space in
the General Plan and Zoning Code. The Specific Plan area will continue to be used as a right -of-
way for Southern California Edison lines and towers.
B. SPECIFIC PLAN SCOPE AND GOALS
The El Segundo General Plan provides the underlying fundamentals of the Aviation Specific Plan.
The Specific Plan serves both as a planning and regulatory document. It is the device implementing
the El Segundo General Plan in the study area.
Proposed development plans or agreements, tentative tract or parcel maps and any other development
approval must be consistent with the Specific Plan. Projects consistent with this Specific Plan will
be automatically deemed consistent with the General Plan.
The Aviation Specific Plan respects the economic, social, environmental and cultural context of the
City. It seeks a balance between status quo and a complete change of the area.
The Aviation Specific Plan has 4 major goals, which reflect the vision of the General Plan:
Facilitate Economic Development
Complement the strong and healthy economic environment of the City, by
accommodating the possibility of higher and better uses from which all diverse
stakeholders may benefit.
b. Enhance the support services available within the City for its residents and various
businesses.
36
2. Suggest Compatible and Healthy Land Uses
a. Promote compatible land uses to maintain and enhance the "Small Town" atmosphere
in El Segundo. Provide effective integration of new uses.
b. Retain and attract economically viable, environmentally safe uses that provide a
stable tax base and minimize any negative impact on the City.
C. Provide a combination of standards and incentives that will stimulate quality
development.
3. Design Safe, Convenient and Efficient Circulation System
a. Provide a system that incorporates the present and future circulation needs of the
surrounding community.
b. Ensure conscious efforts of private development in mitigating traffic impacts on the
community.
4. Accentuate Overall Positive Identity of the Community
a. Enhance services and convenience while respecting the immediate surrounding uses.
b. Serve as an integral part to implement the City's goal of creating "small town"
atmosphere.
C. Incorporate well designed landscape, lighting and signage elements.
2 37
EXHIBIT 1
Simi UeY rnanndo ,
♦ ae Paoolma O upland
'Chabwwe MNs ♦ lme{
i. so ... . , •11i t Wllsose
♦ van,
1 h
Gnopi P� rk • Pananm^ t: `.. ^ �ee
•Rneda v'n bank eMad i
Thousand Oaks Bur
N�. $
WaodN jl A
pD °' •+^..8 ^« { /N I �NndaN #9Ra E Mem�vN
AmaEla e
%U .,:
Coma{ .a5a -�'... San wo
_P•� a _ Temple
I//=.v\ BaIdWN 4 Park
Q • El
M
PaeMO P Nei.{ -♦ _ - ° '. a es I Menem
Bill hu
pca
NN{
v
MarNa Dal Re ♦ wtin{ a rk'�el •M Whitler
I<iwo eWahY e ° SeY Ittler o
Flap 1DWWW1 R•r utle
ProiextSite a8aw as a � od ,
• M / VMI
alk
Manhatlan Beach
t • P o t• 9 7tllower �
Neemosa Beach e
Red
TO • a Haws" Wrtl e
1
Pabs Verdes Eedles r ° I HM
e
m N' Stanbn
Ro{In{ HRIS an *VA arden Gn ve
•Rohn HI Ia0 a0 am e
Rancho Pabe V 8 Be
new wI Yldwav Cl _
Sunset Btloh N
Hundngbn
Regional Location Map N
E
Aviation Specific Plan
City of El Segundo No Scale 38
EXHIBIT 2
Local Vicinity Map
Aviation Specific Plan
City of El Segundo
No Scale
39
EXHIBIT 3
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE
THAT PORTION OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 14 WEST, IN RANCHO SAUSAL
REDONDO, PARTLY WITHIN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED IN CASE NO. 11629, SUPERIOR COURT OF
SAID COUNTY ON JUNE 31, 1890, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK OF SAID COUNTY,
A COPY OF SAID MAP APPEARING IN THE FILES OF THE COUNTY SURVEYOR OF SAID
COUNTY, AS CLERK'S FILED MAP NO. 218, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, SAID EAST LINE BEING ALSO
THE CENTER LINE OF INGLEWOOD AND REDONDO ROAD, WHICH POINT IS NORTH 0
DEGREES 02 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 277.36 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID EAST LINE,
FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF
BEGINNING, NORTH 47 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST 2177.98 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE NORTH 50 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST 291.57 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO
A POINT IN THE NORTHEASTERLY CURVED BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND
CONVEYED TO SANTA FE AND LOS ANGELES HARBOR RAILWAY COMPANY, UNDER PARCEL
I IN THE DEED DATED NOVEMBER 10, 1924, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 3817 PAGE 164,
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID
NORTHEASTERLY CURVED BOUNDARY LINE, 420.48 FEET TO THE END OF SAME; THENCE
CONTINUING ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND
CONVEYED TO SANTA FE AND LOS ANGELES HARBOR RAILWAY COMPANY, THE
FOLLOWING THREE COURSES AND DISTANCES:
SOUTH 47 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 198.05 FEET TO A POINT; NORTH 42
DEGREES 23 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST 20 FEET TO A POINT, AND SOUTH 47 DEGREES 36
MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 1986.12 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF
SAID SECTION.18; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
EAST LINE, 162.59 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
(SAID LAND IS SHOWN AS PARCEL 11 AND A PORTION OF INGLEWOOD AND REDONDO ROAD,
ON MAP NO.8 OF PROPERTY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, LTD., FILED IN
BOOK 3 PAGE 4 OF OFFICIAL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY)
EXCEPT THEREFROM "ALL OIL, WATER, GAS, PETROLEUM AND OTHER MINERAL OF
HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES, LYING IN AND UNDER SAID LAND, PROVIDED THAT THE
PROPECTING THEREFOR AND THE DEVELOPING THEREOF SHALL BE DONE BY MEANS OF
WELLS OR SHAFTS SUNK AND MAINTAINED ON ADJACENT LANDS AND IN SUCH MANNER
AS NOT TO DAMAGE, ENDANGER, OR INTERFERE WITH ANY STRUCTURE WHICH THE
GRANTEE, HIS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, MAY HEREAFTER LOCATE OR MAINTAIN UPON
THE PROPERTY HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED, IT BEING UNDERSTOOD THAT SUCH EXCEPTION
AND RESERVATION SHALL NOT GIVE TO THE GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, ANY
SURFACE RIGHTS WHATEVER UPON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND ", AS PROVIDED IN THE
DEED FROM SECURITY -FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, TO SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, RECORDED MARCH 6, 1930 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 535, IN
BOOK 9640 PAGE 33 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
l
Full a
- w
J
m
W
u
z�w
j 9 i �
fill
1
I
I v�rrr
I
8 9 fit
°'b
N ;
N I,
U /
I
, I
I ,
I I
I % I
I {
i S
I ! I
, I
I ,
1 I
I ,
QY
U
U�
1
I
I
I
\
2
r _ 9
a! E
I })a I
1`
I
I
I
I � �Wi�
Y i V
�`
k agt y
F W Z
0
W
W a
41
!!fl
'm
c
H
H
cc
N
x
x
w
z
a.
H
z
w
z
a
0
a
w
D
w
0
O
H
a
I
1
,
O
9
I
J
I
I
i
�
W
V
L - --
j 9 i �
fill
1
I
I v�rrr
I
8 9 fit
°'b
N ;
N I,
U /
I
, I
I ,
I I
I % I
I {
i S
I ! I
, I
I ,
1 I
I ,
QY
U
U�
1
I
I
I
\
2
r _ 9
a! E
I })a I
1`
I
I
I
I � �Wi�
Y i V
�`
k agt y
F W Z
0
W
W a
41
!!fl
'm
c
H
H
cc
N
x
x
w
z
a.
H
z
w
z
a
0
a
w
D
w
0
g 1 01 0 }1
�AyI I J (I
'fT W 1 �al�
J $i # fiiE
ha�AI7
JIM
aSs W i
b � � ♦1
I I
I � I
I 1
J
---------- ' +
i a i F
I
I l ♦
LL
1+•�wv+r.l j
I 1 r
o� 1��� i � iii€ � • ,. �_J_°� d L�,.�
I � I W
1 �A�
G p: tI
i YYY m
W Z
� R
sggs f W a
ty i p a3s di V }� W Q
E3E Iga �! I��a it'll,
4
J
F
H
w
N
x
w
'aa
a
F
2
a
0
m
m
a
II. OVERVIEW OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN STUDY AREA
A. THE COMMUNITY
The Aviation Specific area is located in the Southeast quadrant of the City of El Segundo.
The design and implementation of this Specific Plan relate directly to its position within this
larger context.
1. Demographics
The community served by the City of El Segundo includes a very diverse population,
representing the full spectrum of social, environmental and economic issues.
As of January 1, 1994, El Segundo has an estimated population of 15,668 and a total of 7,190
dwelling units, an increase of 869 units over the ten -year period from 1980 to 1990. During
1980 to 1995, El Segundo's population has increased by I I %, while housing units have
increased by 14 %. At year -end 1997, the daytime population was approximately 75,000,
The community is experiencing a significant demographic shift towards more young
families. The median age of the residents is 332. Family households are still a majority in
El Segundo (56 %) as opposed to single or unrelated households.
In 1990, the total population within the five miles radius using the Specific Plan area as a
focal point was 499,104. It is projected to be 526,920 in year 2001 at a growth rate of 5.6 %3
2. Location context
The Aviation Specific Plan area is situated at the southeast boundary of the City of El
Segundo, right off the northwest corner of the intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and
Aviation Boulevard. The southwest side of the Plan area is abutted immediately by the MTA
Green Line, which runs north and south in the vicinity, providing service between Norwalk
and Redondo Beach. The Douglas Street station is elevated approximately 25 feet above the
northwest end of the Specific Plan area.
The Specific Plan area is near the City of Manhattan Beach to the southwest, and the City of
Hawthorne to the Northeast. Douglas Street dead -ends on both the southwest and northeast
side of the Plan area, since the roadway is interrupted by the Santa Fe Railroad right -of -way.
3. Economic Context
Over the past seventy -five years, the City of El Segundo has established itself as a major
City of El Segundo Finance Department - December. 1997 Annual Financial Report (CAFR)
1990 Census Data
' Equifax National Decision Systems: Demographic Study - 1998
1.1
43
employment center for a variety of industrial, aerospace, high -tech and airport- related
businesses. In 1995, El Segundo boasted a daytime working population in excess of 50,000
persons. El Segundo is home to many major corporations including Chevron, Computer
Sciences, Hughes, TRW, Mattel, Xerox, Aerospace and Northrop Grumman.
The City is aggressively marketing itself as a favorable business environment using the
concept of a "Small Town for Big Business ",
B. EXISTING LAND USES
City of El Segundo has distinctive land use patterns, which are defined into four quadrants
by Sepulveda Boulevard and El Segundo Boulevard. Compatibility of an individual land use
is determined mainly by its relationship to other uses within its quadrant.
The Aviation Specific Plan area is east of Sepulveda Boulevard and south of El Segundo
Boulevard. This portion of the City is designated as an industrial and commercial region
which contains the Raytheon campus, the Allied Signal complex, the municipal golf course,
the US Air Force Base, and Continental Park, a mixed use complex of hotel, office,
restaurant, retail, research and development, sports club, and entertainment uses.
The adjacent land uses immediately northeast of the Specific Plan area are primarily office,
research & development, light manufacturing and warehouse /distribution, including the
Xerox Corporation. Across Aviation Boulevard, there are single family residential
neighborhoods in the City of Hawthorne; south of Rosecrans in the City of Manhattan Beach
are industrial and commercial uses, including the new Raleigh Manhattan Beach Studios.
Southwesterly of the Santa Fe Railroad tracks is Continental Park, a mixed use complex that
includes a hotel, a sports club, restaurants, theaters, research and development, retail, and
office buildings.
C. EXISTING UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
1. Water Service
Water utility service is provided by the City of El Segundo and is currently available within
the Specific Plan Area. A 12 -inch water line crosses the northwestern portion of the Plan
area from the south leg of Douglas Street.
Reclaimed water systems are not available to the Specific Plan area at this time. The nearest
main line is located in El Segundo Boulevard, approximately a half -mile north of the Plan
area.
2. Fire Protection
The Specific Plan Area is within 1.5 miles of Fire Station 2 located at El Segundo Boulevard
and Nash Street. The provision of water for fire suppression is provided from an existing
hydrant on the northwest side of the Plan area at Douglas Street. Projected occupancy loads
in the Specific Plan Area, the potential of life hazard and the degree of fire hazard are all
9
44
expected to be extremely low.
3. Sewer Service
The City of El Segundo has two separate sewer systems. The Los Angeles County Sanitation
District Areas services areas east of Sepulveda Boulevard, including the Plan area. Service
connections will be made to the existing 8 -inch line in Douglas Street north of the Plan area.
4. Gas/Electric/Telephone Utilities
A 6 -inch Gas line, electric service, and a 12 -inch telephone conduit in Douglas Street north
of the Plan area with adequate capacity are currently available upon application and payment
of applicable fees and charges°.
5. Solid Waste Disposal
Solid waste disposal is provided to commercial and industrial users by a variety of private
haulers. Development within the Specific Plan Area would contract with a provider.
Landfill capacity for the planning term (15 years) is adequate for assumed population and
commercial growth within Los Angeles County5. The Aviation Specific Plan would not
exceed any assumptions for either population or commercial growth in the region.
D. POTENTIAL CHANGES
El Segundo has been steadily moving away from heavy industrial and manufacturing uses
towards commercial and professional uses. With the exception of long- standing uses like
the Chevron Refinery and the Allied Signal and Air Products Chemical Plants, most heavy
industrial uses have disappeared from the city. The reduction in geopolitical tensions have
had a corresponding reduction in armaments manufacturing, a mainstay of the local economy
for many years. In their place, El Segundo has attracted a spectrum of new economy
companies such as Direct TV, Xerox, Sun Microsystems, Infonet and the professional
services that support them.
The City is also improving its circulation infrastructure in the vicinity of the Specific Plan
area. El Segundo is participating in a consortium of jurisdictions to augment the Rosecrans
Avenue and Aviation Boulevard corridors. These major arterials will be expanded by a lane
in each direction providing better access to the I -405 Freeway to the east and improving
north -south mobility in the region. The City is also actively pursuing local, state and federal
transportation monies to connect the two dead ends of Douglas Street beneath the railroad
and Green Line rights -of -way to improve north -south travel routes within El Segundo.
4 City of El Segundo Public Works Department
5 County of Los Angeles Countywide Siting Element, Adopted 1998
10 45
M. POLICIES, STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
The zoning policy is based on a ten -year outlook for development and growth. The Specific
Plan envisions light industrial uses with moderate density. The development will serve the
role of integrating land uses in the area along the MTA Green Line with those along Douglas
Street and Aviation Boulevard.
The Specific Plan anticipates Warehouse and Storage development that will enhance support
services for existing and future businesses and residents and promote a healthy use mix in
a micro economic environment.
The Specific Plan provides for new development that offers quality design tailored to
accommodate the existing SCE transmission lines, which will continue to operate in the Plan
area. The entire area will provide an attractive, clean, safe and well - functioning image to the
community.
Where the Specific Plan does not state standards or guidelines, the Light Industrial (M -1)
Zoning Code development standards shall apply.
A. ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT
City of El Segundo is an employment -led community. El Segundo's development has been
led by employment rather than population growth. Industry experts are optimistic about El
Segundo's economic future due to its many assets. The existing industrial base, high skilled
labor pool and transportation infrastructure all suggest that El Segundo will benefit from the
restructuring of California's economy. The development proposed in the Aviation Specific
Plan area should serve the mission of economic development in the City. This mission is
identified as "to create, maintain and implement a business climate that fosters a strong
economic community, develop a strategic plan that will result in business retention and
attraction, provide an effective level of City services to all elements of the community, and
maintain the quality of life that has characterized El Segundo for more than seven decades ,.6
The development proposed in the study area shall be complementary to the maintenance and
expansion of El Segundo's economic base. The development shall provide positive
contribution to the City's economic base.
Permitted uses within the Specific Plan area shall be able to create job opportunities and seek
for balance between growth, local resources and infrastructure capacity.
Permitted uses shall accommodate the City's future investments in infrastructure and
facilities, such as the Douglas Street road connector, that encourage commercial and
industrial development.
6 El Segundo Website - http: / /www.elsegundo.org
11 46
B. LAND USE
The development in the Aviation Specific Plan area shall address its compatibility with
adjacent uses. The Specific Plan area is currently zoned as Open Space (OS) which serves
mainly as a utility corridor of Southern California Edison for its electrical power lines and
towers.
The Aviation Specific Plan area encourages primarily Warehouse and Storage uses in the
entire planning area with limited ancillary and support uses. The study area shall be rezoned
from the current Open Space (OS) to Aviation Specific Plan (ASP). This is based on the
following findings:
1. The most adjacent use of the property is primarily office light manufacturing and
research & development.
2. The area is currently underutilized. Higher and better uses on the site will be able to
provide city with business license and property tax revenue.
3. The existing designated Open Space mainly serves as Edison's utility corridor and not
accessible to nearby residents or businesses. Therefore, the site is not directly related
to the view, recreation and quality of life in the one -mile radius should it be
redesignated and rezoned.
4. Consistent zoning and utilization of land is a desirable planning policy which fosters
good urban design and quality developments.
C. CIRCULATION
The Aviation Specific Plan area is right off the intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and
Aviation Boulevard. Both arterials experience heavy congestion during the peak hours on
weekdays, and the intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and Aviation Boulevard currently
operates beyond capacity (Level of Service F) at critical times of the day. The traffic impact
on the intersection and the two streets will be an important criterion in evaluating
development proposals for the area.
1. The new development shall accommodate the City's future transportation system
upgrade. In particular, the new development shall incorporate the planned future
connection of Douglas Street. New development shall in its site configuration,
indicate the layout flexibility and the capacity of temporarily providing alternate
access during the construction of Douglas Street road connection.
2• The ingress and egress to the Plan area shall be taken from Aviation Boulevard.
3. Only emergency vehicles, LACMTA, SCE, and other public agency maintenance
vehicles shall be allowed access from Douglas Street on a permanent basis.
4. The traffic generated by new development in the Specific Plan area shall not generate
12
47
more than 150 trips per day.
5. The circulation of the Specific Plan area shall not interfere with the ingress and egress
of the Green Line Transit Station.
6. All parking generated by new development shall be accommodated within the
Specific Plan area. No on street or off - premise parking shall be provided to the
Specific Plan area.
D. AESTHETIC
The Aviation Specific Plan area is situated at the southeast corner of the City, a gateway
location.. The design and quality of new development is directly related to the image of the
City, can affect property values in the adjacent neighborhood, and contribute to the quality
of life in the community.
1. New development in the Specific Plan area shall provide adequate landscaping and
enhance view sheds from adjacent properties. Major activity centers within the Plan
area shall be located to minimize impacts on neighboring properties. Such impacts
may include but not limited to views, noise, odor, light and glare.
'. The design of new development shall provide full architecture treatment of facades
facing the Aviation Boulevard frontage as well as those facing adjacent properties.
3. New development shall provide consistent design quality throughout the premises.
This may include, but not limited to consistent architecture treatments and use of
materials.
4. New development shall provide contemporary landscape treatments.
E. LANDSCAPING
Landscaping is a critical criterion when evaluating development proposals in the Aviation
Specific Plan area. This section will ensure that adequate landscaping area and efficient
maintenance is provided for all new development. This is also in accordance with the City's
requirements to landscape commercial and industrial areas.
The minimum acreage devoted to landscaping within the Specific Plan area shall be
15% of the total land area.
The landscaping within the new development shall soften and buffer the edge of the
property from the adjacent uses, as well as public tight -of -way. The purpose of these
landscaping areas is:
a. To reduce the visual impact of development on the site.
b. To maintain visual security around buildings and between adjacent uses by
13
48
optimizing development configuration.
c. To repeat certain details, with variations, to link buildings into a cohesive design.
d. To reduce the heat gain of parking lots by providing shaded parking.
e. To encourage the use of reclaimed water for irrigation purposes where available.
f. To encourage the use of drought tolerant plant material and water conserving
landscape and irrigation systems.
3. Landscaping criteria is divided into three separate components.
a. Property Entry Area
Landscaping at the entrance of the Specific Plan area shall be accentuated and
distinguished from that within the rest of the Specific Plan area. A permanent
irrigation system shall be installed at the property entry area.
b. Building Perimeter
In those instances where setbacks are provided, all buildings shall have landscape
areas and permanent irrigation systems around their perimeter.
A combination of soft and hard landscape material may be installed in harmony
with the overall design of the development. The design of the landaoan;ne at the
59uth Od of each storaee b ildin ch 11 in omorat a v ri tv of h i htc I A11
and colors toe hanre and 5QIQIhLyicw of th cnnrh Pi +
c. Property Perimeter
All required setback areas shall be fully landscaped including permanent
irrigation systems.
The landscaping shall incorporate the theme utilized for the public right -of -way
and one shaded tree shall be provided for every 25 feet of street frontage.
Frontages on a major thoroughfare shall be generously landscaped to provide an
appealing image of the property.
Setbacks shall be adequately landscaped with trees provided every 130 feet.
Easements encumbered on the property along the property perimeter shall be
landscaped.
Parking may encroach into the landscape setback up to a maximum of 50% of the
required setback area provided that a minimum landscaped setback width of 5
feet is maintained.
14 49
D. PUBLIC SAFETY
New development in the Aviation Specific Plan area shall consciously and effectively ensure
that the property will not pose a public safety nuisance to the community. Considering that
the area is surrounded by hotel, office and light industrial uses, and is adjacent to the Douglas
Street MTA Green Line station, nighttime safety in the area is a critical element in evaluating
development proposals.
1. Lighting shall be adequate throughout the Specific Plan area and shielded to
minimize off -site illumination. The minimum height of a lighting source shall not
be less than 8 feet nor greater than 12 feet. The maximum distance between every
two lighting source shall not exceed 30 feet.
2. The site design and operation shall comply with police safety policies with regard to
site layout and building configurations.
3. New development in the Specific Plan area shall maintain and increase the safety
perception of the MTA Green Line Station which operates late into night
E. SIGNAGE
The purpose of this section is to encourage the effective use of signs as a means of
communication between the Specific Plan Area and the rest of the community. It seeks to
balance enhancing the market visibility of the area with preserving and enhancing the
aesthetic quality of the neighborhood.
Only monument signs shall be permitted in the Aviation Specific Plan Area. No more
than two monument signs will be permitted on each street frontage and no sign will
exceed a maximum 300 square feet in size.
All signs shall be constructed of permanent materials. Signs shall be permanently
attached to the ground, a building or another structure by direct attachment to a rigid
wall, frame or structure. All signs shall be maintained in good structural condition,
and be in compliance with all building and electrical codes at all times.
3. The signage in the Specific Plan area shall reinforce the uniformity of standard
components over the City of El Segundo. Signs in the Specific Plan shall be
consistent in color scheme, lettering or graphic style, lighting, location of sign,
materials, and sign dimensions.
15 50
IV ADMINISTRATION
A. INTRODUCTION
The Aviation Specific Plan shall be administrated in accordance with the City Municipal
Code except as noted herein.
B. SPECIFIC PLAN ADMINISTRATION
Administrative Determinations
Administrative Determinations shall comply with Section 20.72.020 of the El
Segundo Municipal Code.
Land Use Determinations
The Director of Planning and Building Safety may grant administrative
determinations related to uses in accordance with Section 20.72.020 of the El
Segundo Municipal Code.
3. Development Standards Determinations
The Director of Planning and Building Safety may grant administrative
determinations related to development standards, provided any administrative
relief shall not exceed 10% of any development standard.
4. Decision
Decision shall comply with Section 20.72.040 of the El Segundo Municipal Code.
5. Findings for Approval
Findings for Approval shall comply with Section 20.72.045 of the El Segundo
Municipal Code.
6. Expeditious Review Process
Expeditious Review Process shall comply with Section 20.72.050 of the El
Segundo Municipal Code.
Planning Commission Review
Planning Commission Review shall comply with Section 20.72.060 of the El
Segundo Municipal Code.
16
5'
9. Appeals
Appeals shall comply with Section 20.72.070 of the El Segundo Municipal Code.
C. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT COMPLIANCE
The Specific Plan was approved in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines (Guidelines), and City policies adopted to
implement the CEQA and the Guidelines.
CEQA clearance has been granted by the City as follows:
TABLE A
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT COMPLIANCE
Land Use
Maximum Allowable
Development under
CEQA Clearance
Mini storage /Self Storage
66,000 square feet
net floor area
Ctty of El Segundo and Everest Storage
The CEQA clearance indicated above is reflective of the maximum square feet permitted
by the Specific Plan, which is 66,000 square feet (296,750 square feet of lot area times
0.22 FAR = 66,000 square feet).
Additional CEQA clearance may be granted in one (1) of the following two (2) methods.
Exceed Clearance: Approval in accordance with CEQA and City
requirements to exceed the thresholds indicated in Table A.
Within Clearance: Approval of an administrative finding by the Director
of Planning and Building Safety in accordance with Section IV of this
Specific Plan. The Director of Planning and Building Safety must find
that the proposed use and density /intensity does not exceed the CEQA
clearance established in Table A.
17
5D
V. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. PERMITTED USE
Permitted uses in the Aviation Specific Plan are as established below:
Mini - storage /self storage facilities;
2. Outdoor recreational vehicle storage and,
Offsite surface parking lot for adjacent properties.
B. DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
The Aviation Specific Plan Development Standards apply to all uses in the Plan area. Where
the Specific Plan does not state, new development shall comply with the Site Development
Standards in Section 20.40.060 or other applicable sections of the El Segundo Municipal
Code.
General Provisions
a. All uses are subject to administrative site plan review to assure design
compatibility and adequate access when the future Douglas Street connection
is designed and constructed.
b. All uses shall comply with the provisions of Section 20.40.060 of the El
Segundo Municipal Code, except as follows:
C. Landscaping: Not less than 15 per cent of the total net land area shall be
devoted to landscaping which shall be distributed throughout the Specific
Plan area, pursuant to Section III.E. of the Aviation Specific Plan.
Lot Area
a. The minimum lot area shall be the entire Specific Plan area. No subdivision
of land is permitted in the Plan area.
Heieht
a. Buildings within the Specific Plan area shall not exceed 10 feet in height
except for ancillary office use, which shall not exceed 25 feet in height.
b. Structures shall not interfere with the operation of the MTA Green line or the
Southern California Edison transmission lines.
Structures may not cast shadows on adjacent uses.
18 5,3
4. Setbacks
a. Initial Phase: As depicted on the Development Plan A on Exhibit 4.
b. After Douglas Street connection: As depicted on the Development Plan
B on Exhibit 5.
5. Lot Frontage
a. Frontage on Douglas Street and Aviation Boulevard shall be as depicted on
the Development Plan (Exhibit 3).
6. Building Area
a. Total net floor area in the Specific Plan shall not exceed 0.22: 1.0 Floor /Area
Ratio.
7. Walls & Fences
a. All walls and fences will comply with the provisions of Section 20.40.060 of
the El Segundo Municipal Code.
8. Access
a. Public access to the Specific Plan area shall be from Aviation Boulevard.
b. New development shall provide and maintain access for Southern California
Edison (SCE), LACMTA, and other government agency maintenance
vehicles.
c. New development shall be designed to accommodate access for emergency
vehicles.
9. Parking and Loading
a. Parking and loading shall be provided as required by Section 20.40.080 of the
El Segundo Municipal Code.
10. Hours of operation
a. The operation hours shall be limited from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM daily.
PAPlanning & Building Safety \PROJECTS \426- 450 \EA- 427\aviation specific plan.doc
19 54
City Council Ordinance No. Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT B
3. Land Use Element EA -427, EA -470, GPA 97 -4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, DA 99 -1: /0/20/99
shall be permitted if approved with a discretionary application. The
maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is limited to 1.3. (Ord. 1272, GPA
97 -1, 6/17/97).
Urban Mixed -Use South
Permits a mixture of office, research and development, retail, and hotel
uses. Light industrial uses conducted within a fully enclosed building
and adult- oriented businesses shall be permitted if approved with a
discretionary application. The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is
limited to 1.3. (Ord. 1272, GPA 97 -1, 6/17/97).
Parking
Permits areas for parking automobiles, motorcycles, and bicycles in
surface or structured parking. Specific properties have been designated
as parking to insure that adequate long -term parking space will be
available.
124th Street Specific Plan
Permits warehousing and mini - storage uses (with an appurtenant
custodial convenience unit). Also permits a Water Facility. The
maximum FAR is 0.47:1 (with the Water Facility) and 0.54:1 (without
the Water Facility). (Ord. 1309, GPA 99 -1, 8/17/99)
Industrial Designations Light Industrial
Permits light manufacturing, warehousing, research and development,
and office. Light manufacturing is defined as the assembly, packaging,
fabrication, and processing of materials into finished products, rather
than the conversion or extraction of raw materials. The light industrial
activity shall be conducted primarily within structures; outside storage
areas and assembly activity should be limited. The maximum floor area
ratio (FAR) allowed is 0.6. Other compatible uses and additional FAR
may be permitted for individual projects by the approval of a Specific
Plan with supplemental environmental analysis. Alternative methods
of calculating FAR may be permitted, subject to the provisions in the
Zoning Code. (Ord. 1249, GPA 96 -1, 4/2/96).
Heavy Industrial
T
H E
C
I T
Y O
F EL
S
E G U N
D
O •
G
E N
E
R A
111RIF, a 111
L A
N
Industrial Designations Light Industrial
Permits light manufacturing, warehousing, research and development,
and office. Light manufacturing is defined as the assembly, packaging,
fabrication, and processing of materials into finished products, rather
than the conversion or extraction of raw materials. The light industrial
activity shall be conducted primarily within structures; outside storage
areas and assembly activity should be limited. The maximum floor area
ratio (FAR) allowed is 0.6. Other compatible uses and additional FAR
may be permitted for individual projects by the approval of a Specific
Plan with supplemental environmental analysis. Alternative methods
of calculating FAR may be permitted, subject to the provisions in the
Zoning Code. (Ord. 1249, GPA 96 -1, 4/2/96).
Heavy Industrial
T
H E
C
I T
Y O
F EL
S
E G U N
D
O •
G
E N
E
R A
L P
L A
N
3 -9
55
City Council Ordinance No. rage 2 of 3
EXHIBIT B
3. Land Use Element EA -427, EA -470, GPA 97-4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, DA 99 -1: 1020/99
allow recycling of the site to a commercial use.
The area bounded by Nash Street, Maple Avenue, Lairport Street, and
Imperial Avenue is designated as light industrial, which is consistent
with the uses currently operating in that area, primarily the Hughes
facility (50.4 ac).
The area bounded generally by Aviation Boulevard, El Segundo
Boulevard, and Douglas Street is currently a U.S. Government Air
Force Base (48.5 ac), which is expected to remain for the life of the
Plan. The Federal Government designation placed on this area will
allow the types of uses that are existing.
The narrow parcel near the northwest intersection of El Segundo
Boulevard and Aviation Boulevard (3.93 ac), between El Segundo
Boulevard and 124th Street, is a Specific Plan area ( "124th Street
Specific Plan ") which encourages primarily warehousing and storage
uses; however, a City Water Facility may also be developed on the site.
(Ord. 1309, GPA 99 -1, 8/17199)
Southeast Quadrant
The majority of the southeast quadrant is designated light industrial
(365.9 ac). This category allows for a mixture of light industrial and
office uses, similar to what is now existing in some of the business
parks between Douglas Street and Aviation Boulevard.
The southern portion of the quadrant, along Rosecrans Avenue west of
Aviation Boulevard, is designated as Urban Mixed -Use South, allowing
a mixture of office, hotel, and retail uses. This area totals 70.6 acres.
The northeast corner of Rosecrans Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard
(84.8 ac), currently occupied by Air Products and Allied Chemical, are
designated for heavy industrial. There is a small commercial piece (0.9
ac) along Sepulveda Boulevard, just south of El Segundo Boulevard.
(Ord. 1272, GPA 97 -1, 6/17/97).
The remaining land in the southeast quadrant is designated as public
facilities for the Green Line station along El Segundo Boulevard and
the proposed water reclamation facility north of Hughes Way, parks for
the Golf Course and Driving RangC along Sepulveda Boulevard, and
open space along the Southern California Edison transmission line
rights -of -way. A 5.4 acre nortion of the SOntbgm California Edison
right- of -wav area ie also deci¢nat d a th Aviation C rife Pl n a
The privately -owned park for Hughes employees is also designated as
__717 E C
I T Y
OF EL
S
E G U N
D
O
•
G
E
N E
R A
L P L A
N
3 -13
5 6
City Council Ordinance No. Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT B
3. Land Use Element EA -427, EA -470, GPA 97 -4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, DA 99 -1 Draft: 1020179
open space, to ensure it will continue to be used as a recreation facility.
(Ord. 1272, GPA 97 -1, 6/17/97).
The U.S. Government Air Force Base south of El Segundo Boulevard
(42.1 ac) has been placed in the Federal Government land use
designation.
Buildout Projections The buildout projections for the 1992 General Plan are shown in
Exhibit LU -3. Exhibit LU -1 shows the existing uses now present in the
City; Exhibit LU -2 shows the buildout of existing trends under the
previous General Plan.
The existing trends scenarios are shown in order to present a more
accurate buildout for the City. In some cases, development that
occurred prior to either this or the previous General Plan was more
intense than either Plan allowed. The existing trends scenarios,
therefore, take these existing uses into account, where they are expected
to remain for the life of the Plan.
Each exhibit shows the amount of acreage by land use designation and
number of dwelling units or square footage projected, where
appropriate. The total number of dwelling units increases on the 1992
Plan because of land designated for a higher intensity residential use
that has not yet been developed to its allowed density. The projected
7,675 dwelling units would house an estimated population of 17,269
people. In addition, the projected non - residential buildout of the 1992
General Plan is less than the projected buildout of the previous General
Plan. This is due to the fact that some allowed FAR's were lowered in
order to project a more realistic and achievable buildout scenario. (Ord.
1209, GPA 93 -1, 11/2/93; Ord. 1244, 2/6/96; Ord. 1272, GPA 97 -1,
6/17/97).
57
T H E C I T Y O F E L S E Q U N D O • G E N E R A L P L A N
3 -14
City Council Ordinance No.
EXHIBIT C
1992 General Plan
Summary of Existing Trends Buildout
Land Use Category
Acres
Dwelling Units
Square Footage
Single - Family Residential
357.2
2,858
- --
Two- Family Residential
57.4
934
- --
Planned Residential
5.7
65
- --
Multi- Family Residential
119.7
3,389
- --
Neighborhood Commercial
7.1
85
100,000
Downtown Commercial
30.8
91
1,237,000
General Commercial
44.3
- --
1,930,000
Corporate Office
211.2
- --
12,351,000
Smoky Hollow
94.1
268
2,019,454
Urban Mixed -Use North
279.0
- --
15,799,212
Urban Mixed -Use South
70.6
- --
3,997,936
124th Street Specific Plan
3.9
1
73,530
Aviation Specific Plan
5.4
66,000
Parking
11.8
- --
___
Light Industrial
356.1
- --
18,529,000
Heavy Industrial
1,086.8
- --
___
Public Facilities
91.7
- --
-_-
Federal Government
90.6
- --
___
Open Space
78.3
- --
- --
Parks
50.0
- --
- --
Street & Railroad R.O.W.
442.6
ITotals
3,494.3
7,691
56,103,132
Population Prvriection
17,269
Existing construction such as the market, and recently constructed, renovated commercial centers and legal rlonfonforming
residential uses at densities that are currently higher than allowed by the land use designations in this plan will not realistically
be converted to mixed commercial/residenhal uses and Mere buildings are expected to remain for the life of the Plan.
The heavy industrial shown on this plan includes the Chevron Refinery, Southern California Edson Generation Station. Air
Products and Allied Chemical facilities. These facilities have processing equipment and tanks rather than buildngs and are
expected to remain for the life of the Plan. Therefore, no estimated building square footage is shown.
Source: City of El Segundo Planning Department and The Lightfoot Planning Group
Amendments: Ord. 1209, GPA 93-1.11/2/93; Ord. 1244, GPA 95 -1, 2/6/96; Ord. 1272, GPA 97 -1, 6/17/97
Ord. 1279, GPA 97 -2, 10!7/97, Ord. 1309, GPA 99.1, 6117/99. Ord. _, GPA 97 -3,
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO * GENERAL PLAN I
1992 General Plan
Summary of Existing Trends Buildout
extdbit
5 8LU -3
L
PPF
City Council Ordinance No. Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT E
6. Open Space and Recreation Element EA -427, EA -470, GPA 97 -4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, DA 99 -1: 1012099
the urban form, and provides buffers between incompatible land uses.
The Government Code indicates that the open space element should
address the unnecessary conversion of open space land to urban uses.
The element should also provide a program for the provision of open
space in an orderly pattern of growth and development. Both of these
issues are addressed through the implementation policies that are
located at the end of this document.
The majority of El Segundo's open space resources are in the form of
improved park land. Therefore, the City's parks and recreation issues
will be addressed in this Element. Open space issues also overlap those
of other elements, such as Land Use, for designation of open space
areas; Conservation, for the protection of natural resources; and Safety,
for the protection of the public health and safety. Therefore, related
discussions can be found in such elements, and the information
contained in them is consistent with this document. Moreover, a
detailed inventory and analysis of El Segundo's existing open space and
recreational resources is located in the Existing Conditions Report.
Organization This Element contains a summary of the Existing Conditions Report.
A detailed discussion regarding vacant lands, drainage basins, and
regional recreational opportunities can be found in the Existing
Conditions Report. This Element is concluded with the implementation
program which includes a broad goal and detailed objectives and
policies that will guide the City toward achievement of its open space
and recreation goal.
Summary of Existing Conditions
The City of El Segundo has a wide variety of open space and
recreational resources. For purposes of this Element, they will be
grouped into two categories: publicly -owned resources, and privately -
owned resources. See Exhibits OS -1 and OS -2. The publicly -owned
resources include ten public parks, three school sites, a utility
transmission corridor, a golf course and driving range, a recreation
facility, and a beach area. The public facilities contribute a total of
90.47 acres of open and recreational space to the City of El Segundo.
The privately -owned facilities include three parks, two utility
transmission corridors, landscaping, a wildlife preserve, and three
recreational facilities. The private facilities account for a total of
117.59 1= 99 acres. The entire open space and recreation inventory for
the City of El Segundo totals 208.06 21156 acres. (Ord. 1209, GPA 93-
1, 11/2/93; Ord. 1244, GPA 95 -1, 2/6/96; Ord. 1272, GPA 97 -1,
T
H
E C
I T
Y OF
EL
S
E G U N
D
O
•
G
E N
E R
A
L P
L A
N
6 -3
60
City Council Ordinance No. Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT E
6. Open Space and Recreation Element EA -427, EA -470, GPA 974, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, DA 99-1:10120199
which it lives. (Ord. 1244, GPA 95 -1, 2/6/96).
Additional private facilities include the 9.8 acres of landscaping
surrounding the Chevron area, the 3.8 -acre Chevron fitness center
facility, the Old Town Music Hall, and the Seiko Tennis Court. The
Old Town Music Hall operates as a motion picture theater which
features silent films of the 1920's and classics of the 30's and 40's. The
Old Town Music Hall is open to the general public. The Seiko Tennis
Court is only available to Seiko employees.
Two additional utility transmission lines traverse the City. The
associated right -of -way area that is located underneath the lines
provides valuable scenic and recreational open space. A 5.4 acre
portion of Southern California uitility corridor is desginated a the
viation Specific Plan area for "mini- storage" warehou e use. The City
of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power corridor encompasses
a 32 -acre scenic strip area, and the remainine 4.6 40 -acre Southern
California Edison utilities right -of -way is developed into a park land
corridor.
Service Standards The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) recommends a
quarter -of -a -mile service area around each small park and a half -mile
service radius for larger facilities. There is a 1 -block by 1 -block area
within the western portion of the City and a narrow portion of the
northern part of the City, that are located beyond the recommended
service distance from any park. There are no public park facilities
located in the eastern portion of the City, east of Sepulveda Boulevard,
where there are no residential uses.
The Subdivision Map Act (Chapter 4, Article 3, Section 66477[b])
allows the dedication of 3.0 acres of park area per 1,000 population.
However, if the amount of existing neighborhood and community park
area exceeds that limit, the City may adopt a higher standard, up to 5.0
acres /1,000 population. El Segundo has a total of 85.21 acres of park
land that is available to the public (excluding the indoor recreational
0.46 swim facility). Utilizing the 1990 Census population figure of
15,223, the City of El Segundo operates at a park land to population
ratio of 5.60 acres /1,000 population. See calculations below. (Ord.
1244, GPA 95 -1, 2/6/96; Ord. 1272, GPA 97 -1, 6/17/97).
1. 85.21 acres = X acres
15,223 pop. 1,000 pop.
2. (15,223 pop.) x (X acres) = (85.21 acres) x (1,000 pop.)
T H E
C
I T
Y OF
EL
S
E G U N
D
O 0
G
E N
E
R A
L P L A N
6 -10
61
O
z
W
U
z
Z F-
0 m
O=
X
J W
U
z
D
O
U
}
N
U
r O = C - m LN
V u F a C7 W
EI
IL Ce W ro
W W • ; LL
~ C C
W
6 J
� iro= J � 0 0 a� � W
J�.- an,aa,m�.
11 1
�d
e�
W
U
4)
A€a
w
w
U
AWA,
W.
• bI
•Ibi
U'
�I
P
�I
4
y
S�
01111 its 0RIf:li
REVISED DRAFT
EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES
Pursuant to Government
Code §§ 6103, 27383
Recording Requested By
and When Recorded Return to:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
350 MAIN STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AND BY AND BETWEEN
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
AND EVEREST STORAGE, LLC
THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED WITHIN TEN DAYS OF EXECUTION BY ALL
PARTIES HERETO PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF GOVERNMENT CODE §65868.5
Revised 11/8/99
ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc
•i
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Development Agreement ( "Agreement ") is made this day of
November 1999, by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a Municipal
Corporation ( "City") organized and existing under the laws of the State of
California, and SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (the
"Owner ") and EVEREST STORAGE, LLC (the "Developer'). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this
Agreement, the City, Owner, and Developer agree as follows:
Recitals. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and for
the following purposes, each of which are acknowledged as true and correct by
the parties:
A. The City is authorized pursuant to Government Code Sections
65864 through 65869.5 to enter into binding agreements with persons or
entities having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development
of such property in order to establish certainty in the development process.
B. The Owner is the owner of certain real property generally located
at 700 South Douglas Street, El Segundo, California (the "Site,) and more
specifically described by the legal description shown on Exhibit A attached
hereto.
C. The Parties desire to enter into this agreement in conformance
with the Government Code and the City of El Segundo Municipal Code in
order to achieve the development of the Site as expressly provided under the
terms of this Agreement and the Project Approvals.
D. The development for the Site, will consist of the construction of
a commercial self storage facility (the "Project ") through adoption of this
Agreement, Environmental Assessment EA -470, Development Agreement 99-
1, an Environmental Assessment EA -427, General Plan Amendment 97.4,
Zone Change 97 -3, and Zone Text Amendment 98 -6 and for the adoption of
the Aviation Specific Plan (collectively "Project Approvals ") shown on
Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof.
E. On October 14 and 28, 1999, the Planning Commission of the
City of El Segundo held duly noticed public hearings on this Agreement and
the Project Approvals
F. On 1999, the City Council held a duly noticed
public hearing on this Agreement and the Project Approvals.
REVISED: 11/8199 2 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc
65
G. On , 1999, the City Council of the City adopted
Ordinance No. shown on Exhibit C attached hereto, approving this
Agreement and the Project Approvals.
H. The City desires to obtain the binding agreement of the Owner for
the development of the Site in accordance with the provisions of this
Agreement and the Project Approvals.
I. The Owner desires to obtain the binding agreement of the City to
permit the Owner to develop the Project and Site in accordance with the
"Applicable Rules" (as hereinafter defined), including any modifications
permitted by this Agreement.
J. Owner, and its Developer, Everest Storage, LLC, are desirous of
receiving approval of this mutually binding Agreement. The Planning
Commission and City Council of the City have given notice of intention to
consider this Agreement, have conducted public hearings thereon pursuant to
the Government Code, and have found that the provisions of this Agreement
are consistent with Chapter 20 of the City's Municipal Code ( "Zoning
Ordinance ") the City's General Plan.
K. This Agreement is consistent with the present public health,
safety, and needs of the residents of the City of El Segundo and the
surrounding region.
L. This Agreement will bind the City to the terms and obligations
specified in this Agreement and will limit, to the degree specified in this
Agreement and under State law, the future exercise of the City's ability to
delay, postpone, preclude or regulate development of the Project on the Site
except as provided for herein.
M. Notwithstanding the above, this Agreement does not commit the
City to undertake the development of the Douglas Street Roadway
Improvements, as defined in Section 2.(c) of this Agreement.
N. An environmental review conducted and approved in November,
1999 in conjunction with the above referenced Project Approvals in
accordance with the applicable statutes, ordinances, and regulations of the
State of California and of the City of El Segundo. Environmental review of
the Douglas Street Roadway Improvements, as defined in Section 2.(c) of this
Agreement, shall be conducted by the City at a future date.
0. This Agreement eliminates uncertainty in the planning review
process and provides for the orderly development of the Project Site. Further,
this Agreement eliminates uncertainty about the validity of exactions to be
imposed by the City, allows installation of necessary improvements, provides
for public services appropriate to the development of the Project Site, and
generally serves the public interest within the City of El Segundo and the
surrounding region.
REVISED: 11/8/99
3 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc
66
2. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires:
(a) "Applicable Rules" means the statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, and
official policies of the City in force as of the "Effective Date" (as hereinafter
defined) governing zoning, development, density, permitted uses, growth
management, environmental consideration, and design criteria applicable to
the Project as modified by Section 7b of this Agreement.
(b) "Discretionary Actions; Discretionary Approvals" are actions which
require the exercise of judgment or a decision, and which contemplate and
authorize the imposition of revisions or conditions, by the City, including any
board, commission, or department of the City, the City Council and any officer
or employee of the City, in the process of approving or disapproving a
particular activity, as distinguished from an activity which merely requires the
City, including any board, commission, or department of the City and any
officer or employee of the City, to determine whether there has been
compliance with applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, or conditions of
approval.
(c) "Douglas Street Roadway Improvements" is the construction of a public
roadway between the southern terminus of Douglas Street, south of Alaska
Avenue and the northern terminus of Douglas Street, north of Park Place. The
roadway is proposed to extend under the existing railroad track by construction
of a grade separation structure that includes a drainage pump station, which
would include construction of a temporary "Shoo -fly" for the operation of the
railroad during construction. The improvements would also include
underground utility conduit for the Owner's future utility lines. Alternatively,
an at grade railroad crossing may be developed at the City's discretion.
(d) "Effective Date" is the effective date of this Agreement and shall be the
date the ordinance approving this Agreement, as signed by the parties, is
operative under Government Code § 36937 (thirty days following its adoption
by the City Council).
(e) "Zoning ordinance" is Chapter 20 of the City's Municipal Code as it
exists on the Effective Date of this Agreement.
3. Interest of Owner. The Owner represents to the City that, as of the Effective
Date, it owns the Site in fee, subject to encumbrances, easements, covenants,
conditions, restrictions, and other matters of record as of November 16, 1999,
4. Binding Effect. This Agreement, and all of the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, shall run with the land comprising the Site and shall be binding
upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective assigns, heirs,
or other successors in interest.
Negation of Agency. The Parties acknowledge that, in entering into and
performing under this Agreement, each is acting as an independent entity and
not as an agent of the other in any respect. Nothing contained herein or in any
REVISED: 11/8/99 4 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc
67
document executed in connection herewith shall be construed as making the
City and Owner joint venturers, partners or employer/ employee.
6. Development of the Property. The following specific restrictions shall govern
the use and development of the Project and the Site:
(a) "Permitted Uses" The Site may only be used for those utility uses which
currently exist on the Site and uses as shown on Exhibit B, The Aviation
Specific Plan attached hereto.
(b) "Development Standards" All design and development standards
applicable to the development of the Site shall be in accordance with the
Applicable Rules and the Project Approvals as amended or modified in the
future by mutual written consent.
Acknowledgments, Agreements an d Assurances on the Part of the Owner. The
parties acknowledge and agree that Owner's grant of an easement for road
purposes will fulfill substantial public needs. The City acknowledges and
agrees that there is good and valuable consideration to the City resulting from
Owner's assurances and faithful performance thereof and that same is in
balance with the benefits conferred by the City on the Project and the Owner
by this Agreement as more particularly described in this Section below. The
parties further acknowledge and agree that the exchanged consideration
hereunder is fair, just and reasonable.
In consideration of the foregoing and the City's assurances set out in Section 8
below, Owner hereby agrees as follows:
(a) During the term of the Development Agreement and upon 30 days
written notice, Owner will grant an easement for road and utility purposes to
the City in the approximate location depicted on Exhibit D. In order for
Owner to provide such easement, City must prepare and deliver a legal
description for the easement. The form of the easement shall be substantially
similar in form to that which is attached hereto as Exhibit E. In no event
however shall the easement granted exceed 26,042.95 square feet, be more
than 82 feet wide; or be granted for any other purpose other than the Douglas
Street Roadway Improvements. Additionally, Owner and City shall provide
each other with an Ingress and Egress Easement (City's use of such easement
shall be limited to the provision of fire and safety services) in substantially
similar form as the form of easement attached hereto as Exhibit F, in the
approximate location depicted on Exhibit D.
(b) The City and the Owner acknowledge that this grant of road easement is
in lieu of eminent domain proceedings. The City represents and warrants that
the City has the power and authority to condemn for the rights granted under
this grant of road easement. _
REVISED: 11/8/99
ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc
°' 6 E
(c) To provide the City upon thirty days written notice with Temporary
Entry Permits as identified on Exhibit D hereto in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit G.
(d) Owners shall post or cause to be posted a bond or pay cash in favor of
the City in the amount of $250,000 which may be used by the City for the
relocation, elimination, or modification of Owner's utility facilities existing on
and near the Site as of the date the City requests the road and utility easement,
pursuant to Section 7(a) hereof, as necessary for the construction of the
Douglas Street Roadway Improvements. The City shall be entitled to receive
bond proceeds up to $250,000 only for the actual cost, as adequately
documented by the City, of such relocation, elimination or modification of
Owner's utility facilities. Any cost in excess of $250,000 shall be home
exclusively by the City. In the event the City does not incur costs related to
the Douglas Street Roadway Improvements on or before the expiration of the
fifth year from the issuance date of the bond, then the bond shall automatically
terminate or the cash shall be refunded to such user or lessee.
(e) Pedestrian access will remain in effect in accordance with the current
license agreement that exists between Owner and the Metropolitan Transit
Authority for pedestrian path.
(f) To offer the City the right to license .61 acres of right -of -Way located
on Washington Street between Walnut Avenue and Sycamore Avenue, and
3.05 acres of right -of -way located on Illinois Street between Mariposa Avenue
and Holly Avenue under the same terms and conditions, and with a concurrent
term as the Cities existing park license located on Washington Street between
Mariposa and Sycamore. City can only exercise this offer following the
Effective Date, and must exercise such offer no later than six (6) months from
such date, for the offer shall become null and void. Improvements to, and
maintenance of, these rights -of -ways, excluding SCE improvements, shall be at
the City's sole cost and expense.
8. Acknowled ements Agreements and Assurances on the Part of the City. In
order to effectuate the provisions of this Agreement, and in consideration for
the Owner to obligate itself to carry out the covenants and conditions set forth
in the preceding Section 7 of this Agreement, the City hereby agrees and
assures Owner that Owner will be permitted to carry out and complete the
development of the Project within the Site, subject to the terns and conditions
of this Agreement, the conditions of the Project Approvals and the Applicable
Rules.
Therefore, the City hereby agrees and acknowledges that:
(a) Owner's lessee may use Aviation Boulevard for permanent access
purposes to Site for the Project.
(b) The Owner's Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee for the Development of the
Site, as required by the City's Traffic Mitigation
Fee Resolution, shall be
REVISED: 11/8/99 6
ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc
69
(c) City shall design and construct Douglas Street Roadway Improvements
to accommodate permanent access to the Site for Owner.
(d) The Owner shall not be responsible for the cost of the design,
construction and maintenance of the Douglas Street Roadway Improvements.
(e) City shall waive its Development Agreement application costs and
associated City costs including the City Attorneys cost to review documents
associated with the Agreement.
(f) City shall be responsible for the elimination and/or relocation of
Owner's improvements which do, or may, interfere with the construction of
the Douglas Street Roadway Improvements existing at the time the City
requests the road and utility easement, pursuant to Section 7.(a) hereof.
(g) City acknowledges that Owner must retain all appropriate easements for
its overhead and underground facilities that do not interfere with the Douglas
Street Roadway Improvements, and that to the extent the City needs to relocate
such easements for the Douglas Street Roadway Improvements, the City must
provide such new easements to Owner.
(h) Entitlement to Develop. The Owner is hereby granted the vested right to
develop the Project on the Site to the extent and in the manner provided in this
Agreement, subject to the Applicable Rules. Any change in the Applicable
Rules, including, without limitation, any change in the General Plan, any
applicable specific plan (Excluding the Aviation Specific Plan), Zoning
Ordinance, growth management regulations, design standards or any
subdivision regulation of the City, adopted or becoming effective after the
Effective Date, shall not be applied by the City to the Project on the Site.
9 Cooperation and Implementation. The City and Owner agree that they will
cooperate to the fullest extent reasonable and feasible to implement this
Agreement. Owner and City shall commence in a timely manner to complete
all steps necessary for the implementation of this Agreement and the
development of the Project or Site in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement.
10. Review of Compliance.
(a) Periodic Review. The City Manager of City or his/her designee shall
review this Agreement annually, on or before the anniversary of the Effective
Date, in accordance with the procedure and standards set forth in this
Agreement and the El Segundo Municipal Code and City Council Resolution
No. 3268 in order to ascertain compliance by the Owner with the terms of this
Agreement.
(b) Special Review. The City Council of the City may order special review
of compliance with this Agreement at any time. The Director of Planning and
REVISED: 11/8/99 7 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc
70
Building Safety or the City Council, as determined from time to time by the
City Council, shall conduct such special reviews.
(c) Procedure. During either a periodic review or a special review, the Owner
shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of this
Agreement. The burden of proof on this issue shall be on the Owner. The
parties acknowledge that failure by the Owner to demonstrate good faith
compliance shall constitute grounds for termination or modification of this
Agreement in accordance with Government Code § 65865.1.
(d) Cure of Default. If, on the basis of review of this Agreements the Director
of Planning and Building Safety concludes that the Owner has not complied in
good faith with the terms of this Agreement, then the Director of Planning and
Building Safety may issue a written "Notice of Non - compliance" specifying
the grounds therefor and all facts demonstrating such noncompliance. The
Owner's failure to cure the alleged non - compliance within thirty (30) days or
such longer reasonable period of time after receipt of said notice, shall
constitute a default under this Agreement, subject to possible termination of
the Agreement as provided below. Upon completion of a periodic review or a
special review, the Director of Planning and Building Safety shall submit a
report to the City Council setting forth the evidence concerning good faith
compliance by the Owner with the terms of this Agreements and the
recommended finding on that issue.
11. Proceedings Upon Termination. If the City determines to proceed with
termination of this Agreement, the City shall give written notice to the Owner
of its intention to terminate this Agreement and comply with the notice and
public hearing requirements of Government Code §§ 65868 and 65867. At the
time and place set for the hearing on termination, the Owner shall be given an
opportunity to be heard. If the City Council finds, based upon substantial
evidence, that the Owner has not reasonably complied in good faith with the
terms or conditions of this Agreement, the City Council may modify or
terminate this Agreement.
12. Modification Amendment. or Cancellation. Subject to the notice and hearing
requirements of Section 65867 of the Government Code, this Agreement may
be modified or amended from time to time by mutual consent of the parties or
their successors in interest in accordance with the provisions of the El Segundo
Code and Section 65868 of the Government Code.
13. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall become operative and commence
upon the Effective Date and shall remain in effect for a term of eight (8) years,
unless said term is terminated, modified, or extended by circumstance set forth
in this Agreement or by mutual consent of the parties hereto. Owner may
apply, at any time during the initial eight (8) year tern, for an extension of up
to an additional five (5) years which shall be subject to the discretionary
review of the City Planning Commission and City Council. If an extension is
granted, the Owner may apply, at any time during the extension term, for a
second extension of up to an additional five (5) years which shall be subject to
the discretionary review of the City Planning Commission and City Council.
REVISED: 11/8/99 8 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc 71
Following the expiration of said term, this Agreement shall be deemed
terminated and of no further force and effect; provided, such termination shall
not automatically affect any right of the City or Owner arising from City
approvals on the Site prior to the expiration of the term and arising from the
duties of the parties as prescribed in this Agreement.
14. Remedies For Default. It is acknowledged by the Parties that the City would
not have entered into this Agreement if it were to have unlimited liability and
damages under this Agreement, or with respect to this Agreement, or the
application thereof The Parties agree and recognize that, as a practical matter,
it will not be possible physically, financially, and as a matter of land use
planning, to restore the Site to its prior state once the construction is
commenced. Moreover, Owner has invested a considerable amount of time
and financial resources in planning the time, location, intensity of use,
improvements and structures for the development of the Project Site.
For these reasons, the Parties agree that it will not be possible to determine an
amount of monetary damages which would adequately compensate the parties.
Therefore, the Parties agree that monetary damages will not be an adequate
remedy for either party should the other fail to perform its duties under this
Agreement. The Owner's remedies under this Agreement shall be limited to
the right to specifically enforce the terms of this Agreement. The City's
remedies under this Agreement shall also include the right to specifically
enforce the terms of this Agreement. In addition to specific performance, if
the Owner fails to complete any other act or performance specified in this
Agreement in a reasonable manner, the Owner shall have no further right or
entitlement to any building permits or certificates of occupancy for any portion
of the Site until the default has been cured in accordance with due process and
as provided in this Agreement. The Parties recognize that this section may
result in the limitation or cessation of the rights otherwise conferred by this
Agreement upon the Owner, including any of the Owner's successors, assigns,
transferees, or other persons or entities acquiring title to or otherwise acquiring
an interest in the Project or any portion thereof.
15. Administration of Agreement and Resolution of Disputes All decisions by the
City staff concerning the interpretation and administration of this Agreement
and the Project which is the subject hereof are appealable to the City Council
and all like decisions by the City Council shall be final. However, decisions of
the City Council shall also be subject to judicial review pursuant to Code of
Civil Procedure Section 1094.5. so long as such action is filed in a court of
competent jurisdiction not later than 90 days following the date on which the
City's decision becomes final pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6.
16. Notices. All notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be
effective when personally delivered or upon receipt after deposit in the United
States mail as registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt
requested, to the following representatives of the parties at the addresses
indicated below:
REVISED: 11/8/99
ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc
ro
If to City: City of El Segundo
Attn: City Clerk
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90524
With a Copy to: Burke, William's & Sorenson
Atttn: Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
611 West Sixth Street
25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
If to Owner: Southern California Edison Company
Attn: Dana Bullock
100 N. Long Beach Blvd., #1004
Long Beach, CA 90802
With a Copy to: Everest Storage, LLC
Attn: Carl Beckmann
199 South Los Robles Avenue, #440
Pasadena, CA 91101
17. Severability and Termination. If any provision of this Agreement is
determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable,
or if any provision of this Agreement is superseded or rendered unenforceable
according to any law which becomes effective after the Effective Date, the
remainder of this Agreement shall be effective to the extent the remaining
provisions are not rendered impractical to perform, taking into consideration
the purposes of this Agreement.
18. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each provision of this Agreement
of which time is an element.
19. Force Maicure. In the event of changed conditions, changes in, county, state
or federal laws or regulations, floods, delays due to strikes, inability to, obtain
materials, civil commotion, fire, acts of God, or other circumstances which
substantially interfere with carrying out the Project, as approved by the City, or
with the ability of either party to perform its obligations under this Agreement,
and which are not due to actions of Owner or City and are beyond its
reasonable control, the parties agree to bargain in good faith to modify such
obligations to achieve the goals and preserve the original intent of this
Agreement.
20 Waiver. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective
unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the Party
against whole enforcement of a waiver is sought.
21. Constructive Notice and Acceotance. Every person who, now or hereafter,
owns or acquires any right, title or interest in or to any portion of the Project
Site is, and shall be, conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to
every provision contained herein, whether or not any reference to this
REVISED: 11/8/99 10 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc 7-0)
Agreement is contained in the instrument by which such person acquired an
interest in the Project Site.
22. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for the
sole protection and benefit of the Parties and their successors and assigns, and
Owner and its successors and assigns. No other person shall have any right of
action based upon any provision of this Agreement.
23. Attorney's Fees. If either Party commences any action for the interpretation,
enforcement, termination, cancellation or rescission of this Agreement, or for
specific performance for the breach hereof, the prevailing party shall be
entitled to its reasonable attorney's fees, litigation expenses, and costs.
24. Incornoration of Exhibits. The following Exhibits are part of this Agreement
and each of which are incorporated herein by this reference:
Exhibit No. A
Legal Description of Site
Exhibit No. B
Aviation Specific Plan
Exhibit No. C
City Council Ordinance No._
Exhibit No. D
Proposed Site Plan for Douglas Street Road Easements
Exhibit No. E
Form of Road Easement
Exhibit No. F
Form of Ingress and Egress Easement
Exhibit No. G
Form of Temporary Entry Permit
25. Entire Agreement: Conflicts. This Agreement represents the entire agreement
of the parties. Should any or all of the provisions of this Agreement be found to
be in conflict with any other provision or provisions found in the Project
Approvals, Applicable Rules, then the provisions of this Agreement shall
prevail.
26. Hold Harmless. Owner shall defend, indemnify and hold the City and its
elected and appointed boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees
harmless from any and all claims, costs, losses, fines, penalties, demands,
injuries, judgments and/or liabilities for any damages ( "Collectively Damages ")
arising out of, or resulting from, the City's approval of this Agreement, the
Project Approvals or either party's performance pursuant to this Agreement,
excepting therefrom Damages resulting from the City's active negligence or
willful misconduct.
27. Owner/Develooer Obligations. As between Owner and Developer only, the
Owner and Developer agree that those obligations set forth in Sections 7.(d)
and 26, hereof and in the Project Approvals shall be the obligations of the
Developer.
REVISED: 11/8/99 11 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clemdoc 74
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have each executed this Agreement of
the date first written above.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
Un
Mike Gordon, Mayor
ATTEST:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
!n
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
In
EVEREST STORAGE, LLC
LN
REVISED: 11/8/99
12 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc
7J
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On 1999, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
said state, personally appeared and
known to me to the persons who executed the within
instrument as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF EL
SEGUNDO, the public agency therein named, and acknowledged to me that
such Commission executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a
resolution of its members.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Name (typed or printed)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On 1999 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said
State, personally appeared known to me to be the President of and known to
me to be the Secretary of the corporation that executed the within instrument,
known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf
of , the Corporation therein named, and
acknowledged to me that such Corporation executed the within instrument
pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Name (typed or printed)
REVISED: 11/8/99 13 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc
76
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE
THAT PORTION OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 14
WEST, IN RANCHO SAUSAL REDONDO, PARTLY WITHIN THE CITY
OF EL SEGUNDO, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED IN CASE NO. 11629,
SUPERIOR COURT OF SAID COUNTY ON JUNE 31, 1890, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK OF SAID COUNTY, A COPY OF SAID
MAP APPEARING IN THE FILES OF THE COUNTY SURVEYOR OF
SAID COUNTY, AS CLERK'S FILED MAP NO. 218, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION It,
SAID EAST LINE BEING ALSO THE CENTER LINE OF INGLEWOOD
AND REDONDO ROAD, WHICH POINT IS NORTH 0 DEGREES 02
MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 277.36 FEET' MEASURED ALONG SAID
EAST LINE " FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18;
THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, NORTH 47 DEGREES 36
MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST 2177.98 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE
NORTH 50 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST 291.57 FEET,
MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT IN THE NORTHEASTERLY CURVED
BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO SANTA
FE AND LOS ANGELES HARBOR RAILWAY COMPANY, UNDER
PARCEL 1 IN THE DEED DATED NOVEMBER 10, 1924, AND
RECORDED IN BOOK 3817 PAGE 164, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID
COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID
NORTHEASTERLY CURVED BOUNDARY LINE, 420.48 FEET TO THE
END OF SAME; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE
NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND
CONVEYED TO SANTA FE AND LOS ANGELES HARBOR RAILWAY
COMPANY, THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES AND DISTANCES:
SOUTH 47 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 198.05 FEET TO
A POINT; NORTH 42 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST 20
FEET TO A POINT, AND SOUTH 47 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 05
SECONDS EAST 1986.12 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT IN THE
EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 02
MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 162.59 FEET,
MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
(SAID LAND IS SHOWN AS PARCEL I1 AND A PORTION OF
INGLEWOOD AND REDONDO ROAD, ON MAP NO. 8 OF PROPERTY
OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, LTD., FILED IN
BOOK 3 PAGE 4 OF OFFICIAL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY).
REVISED: 11/8/99 14 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc
7i
EXCEPT THEREFROM -ALL OIL, WATER, GAS, PETROLEUM AND
OTHER MINERAL OF HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES, LYING IN AND
UNDER SAID LAND, PROVIDED THAT THE PROPECTING THEREFOR
AND THE DEVELOPING THEREOF SHALL BE DONE BY MEANS OF
WELLS OR SHAFTS SUNK AND MAINTAINED ON ADJACENT LANDS
AND IN SUCH MANNER AS NOT TO DAMAGE, ENDANGER, OR
INTERFERE WITH ANY STRUCTURE WHICH THE GRANTEE, HIS
SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, MAY HEREAFTER LOCATE OR
MAINTAIN UPON THE PROPERTY HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED, IT
BEING UNDERSTOOD THAT SUCH EXCEPTION AND RESERVATION
SHALL NOT GIVE TO THE GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS,
ANY SURFACE RIGHTS WHATEVER UPON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
LAND ", AS PROVIDED IN THE DEED FROM SECURITY -FIRST
NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON COMPANY, RECORDED MARCH 6, 1930 AS INSTRUMENT
NO. 535, IN BOOK 9640 PAGE 33 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
REVISED: 11/8/99
15 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clm.doc
78
PROJECT APPROVALS
AVIATION SPECIFIC PLAN
REVISED: 11/8/99 16 ES-SCE A
geement November 5 Cleaadoc
79
n:
ORDINANCE NO._
[INSERT WHEN AGREEMENT ADOPTED]
REVISED: 11/8/99 17 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc
80
EXHIBIT D
PROPOSED SITE PLAN :,FOR DOUGLAS STREET RQAD
$ W LL
J m A N A f IO N
A m A A P O I
P\
m-
y
'�•F OZ/ 10 N _
o�
O I
Zp j x Yry
J {,
�S
z �". ,
�9\ S
90\ !.
b\
b'
g$OQ
� gyyyymmmm
:
N W
W
r
W
>
z �". ,
�9\ S
90\ !.
b\
b'
\9 >
S
I .SOEM096 •Z6
ff
LLV
W
f H: ybJ'S`i
r�
`^ N
b
a
J g
w � • b•
m !S H
g
g$OQ
� gyyyymmmm
:
N W
W
r
W
>
p
C
ri
g
ri
C%
� n
s
"
a
P
a
u
e
z¢
z
12
�+gg
Ymi
a
P
O
T
m
O
N
N
p
P
O
p
\9 >
S
I .SOEM096 •Z6
ff
LLV
W
f H: ybJ'S`i
r�
`^ N
b
a
J g
w � • b•
m !S H
g
N
g$OQ
� gyyyymmmm
:
N W
W
r
W
>
p
C
ri
g
ri
C%
� n
s
"
a
P
a
u
e
z¢
z
12
�+gg
Ymi
N
II:
FORM OF ROAD EASEMENTS
When Recorded Mail To:
City of El Segundo
Attn: City Clerk
350 Main Street
El Segundo, California
Highway and Utility Easement
For a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Southern California Edison Company does hereby grant to the City of El
Segundo a perpetual easement for public road and highway purposes and
public utility purposes, and the right to construct, maintain, operate and use
public utility and appurtenant structures in, above and across the real property
in the City of El Segundo, State of California, as described on Exhibit A
(servient tenement) hereto, together with the right to enter upon and to pass
and repass over and along said easement and right -0f -way and to deposit tools,
implements, and other materials, thereon, by said city, its officers, agents, and
employees, and by any contractor, his or her agents and employees, engaged
by said city whenever and wherever necessary for the purposes set forth above.
REVISED: 11/8/99
19 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc. 8
FORM OF INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT
When Recorded Mail To:
City of El Segundo
Attn: City Clerk
350 Main Street
El Segundo, California 90245
Reciprocal Ingress and Egress Easements
For a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Southern California Edison Company, hereby grants to the City of El Segundo
a perpetual easement for purposes of emergency vehicle ingress and egress
over and across the property described as follows: [legal description of
servient tenement]
For valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, City of
El Segundo, hereby grants the Southern California Edison Company, a
perpetual easement for purposes of ingress and egress over and across the
property described as follows:
[legal description of servient tenement]
REVISED: 11/8/99 20 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc -
R;
FORM OF TEMPORARY ENTRY PERMIT
Permission is given to
PURPOSE:
TERM: Commencing
TEMPORARY ENTRY PERMIT
Acct. No.
to enter upon Edison's property located
Ending
SUBJECT TO: Licenses from Southern California Edison and all other licenses, covenants,
conditions, restrictions, reservations, rights and easements whether of record or not.
INDEMNIFICATION/INSURANCE: Penmttee agrees, for itself, and for its and their agents and
employees and any person or persons claiming under the Permittee, to save harmless and indemnify
Edison, its successors and assigns, and its and their officers, agents, employees, tenants, licensees and
Permittees from and against all claims, demands, loss, damage, actions, causes of action, expense
and/or liability arising or growing Out of loss of or damage to property including the property of
Edison, its successors and assigns, and its and their officers, agents, employees, tenants, licensees, and
Permittees or injury to or death of persons resulting in any manner, directly or indirectly, from the
maintenance, use, operation, repair or presence of said use. Permittee further agrees to insure its
liabilities which may arise from its activities hereunder by the purchase of a liability insurance policy
with a Combined Single Limit of not less than Dollars (S).
WARRANTY: It is expressly understood and agreed that Permittee takes the premises as is, and that
Edison makes no representation, covenant, warranty or promise that the said premises are fit for any
particular use which this agreement was entered into and Permittee has not relied on any such
representation, covenant, warranty or promise.
FEE:
ASSIGNMENT: This permit is for the sole use and privilege of Permittee and cannot be assigned or
transferred. Any attempt to do so may render this permit voidable at Edison's discretion.
TERMINATION: This permit is revocable immediately at the sole option and discretion of Edison
and the Permittee agrees to peaceably surrender the premises upon written or oral demand by Edison
or its authorized representative.
AUTHORITY: This permit is issued subject to General Order No. 69—C of the Public Utilities
Commission of the State of California dated and effective July 10, 1985, incorporated herein by this
reference. Permittee agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and
regulations.
RESTRICTIONS:
1. Permittee agrees that any equipment used on the subject property shall be used so as to maintain
a minimum clearance of twenty five ( 25 ) feet from all Edison structures and a tr»nimurn
clearance of twenty five (25) feet from all overhead electrical conductors located on said
property.
2. Pemiittee shall provide Edison with adequate access to all of Edison 'a facilities and at no time is
there to be any interference with the free movement of Edison's equipment and materials.
3. Permittee will not park, repair or refuel, or permit to be, parked, repaired or refueled, any
vehicles or mechanized equipment within the assigned area.
4. Permittee agrees to lock or close any fences or gates at end of work day and during nonuse of
the property.
REVISED: 11/8/99 21 ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean doO
84
5. Upon termination of this permit the Permittee agrees to restore the premises to a condition as
close as possible to that when they entered upon said property.
6. No buildings, structures, or accumulation of flammable or combustible materials or explosives
shall be permitted on said property.
7. Permittee shall not engage in, or permit any other party to engage in, any activity on the
Premises that violates any federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations pertaining to
hazardous, toxic or infectious materials and/or waste ( "Hazardous Materials "). Permittee shall
comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, riles, and regulations pertaining to
disclosure of Hazardous Materials. Permittee shall comply with all applicable federal, state, or
local laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to the storage and/or discharge of Hazardous
Materials. Permittee shall indemnify and hold Edison, its directors, officers, agents and
employees and its successors and assigns harmless from any and all claims, loss, damage,
actions, causes of actions, expenses and/or liability arising from leaks of, spills of, releases of,
and/or contamination by or from Hazardous Materials as defined by applicable laws, rules or
regulations, which arise during or after the Permit term, and are attributable to the actions of, or
failure to act by, Permittee or any person claiming under Permittee.
8. In recent years there have been numerous scientific studies about the effects of power frequency
(60 Hz) EMF. There are several sources of EMF, including household appliances and electric
power facilities. Scientists do not agree on how to interpret the currently available information.
There is agreement, however, that this is an important issue that should be resolved. Edison
would like to share with the Permittee the balanced information or literature Edison has about
EMF, if said prospective Permittee is interested. Should Pemunce wish, brochures will be made
available, upon request, that explain some facts about EMF and that outline Edison's policy in
this area. Permittee agrees to advise Edison if they have any questions or require additional
information.
9. Pennittee, their contractors, and employees must have in their possession at all times a copy of
this Temporary Entry Permit while on the premises.
Special Conditions:
I have read and understand and agree to comply with all
of the above conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Address
City, CA
Telephone( )
Date:
SCE 22 -20 Rev 7192
Metropolitan Transmission Area
Date'
Approved
REVISED: 11/8/99 22
WkJYJ SOUTHERN GDFORNIA
Ej EDISON
An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company
Agent's Name
Agent's Title
Corporate Real Estate
Real Estate Revenue Division
100 N. Long Beach Blvd., Suite 1004
Long Beach, CA 90802
Date:
ES -SCE Agreement November 5 Clean.doc
85
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
INTER - DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
Meeting Date: Thursday, October 28, 1999
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: James M. Hansen, Interim Director of Planning and Building Safety V'1
THROUGH: Laurie B. Jester, Senior Planner
STAFF
PLANNER: Paul Garry, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: EnvirnnM.nfet Aww- -_ -__.
Environmental
Aviation S Douglas - -
Specific Plan and Street Extension Development
Agreement
Address: 700 South Douglas Street (between Douglas Street
and Aviation Boulevard
Property Owner: Southern California Edison
REQUEST
The Planning Division is recommending approval of the Development Agreement and Aviation
Specific Plan for a 5.4 acre narrow corridor of land oriented in a generally northwest to
southeast diagonal between Aviation Boulevard and Douglas Street. The Specific Plan would
amend the General Plan and Zoning Map to change the existing Land Use Designation and
Zoning from Open Space (O -S) to Aviation Specific Plan (ASP). The Development Agreement
would provide a means for the City to acquire an easement across the subject property in order
to construct an extension of Douglas Street. The roadway would join the two dead -ends of
Douglas Street, through the construction of a roadway underpass beneath the existing
Burlington North Santa Fe railroad right -of -way and the MTA Metro Greenline Station. Through
the Development Agreement SCE would also agree to lease a total of 3.66 acres of land along
Washington Street and Illinois Street between Walnut and Holly Avenues for park purposes.
The Aviation Specific Plan area encourages primarily Warehouse and Storage uses in the
entire planning area, specifically with a one story, approximately 377 -unit mini - storage facility
(65,230 square feet) proposed, with limited ancillary and support uses.
Consistent with similar applications, the Planning Commission will be asked to make a
recommendation to the City Council on the project, and the City Council will take final action on
all the applications.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission review the facts and
required findings related to the proposed project and take the following action:
8G
Approve draft Resolution No. 2432 recommending approval of the project
applications to the City Council.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan project is located within the southeast portion of the City of
El Segundo, with convenient access to the San Diego (1 -405) Freeway and Glenn Anderson (1-
105) Freeway. The Douglas Street Metro Green Line Station abuts the site. This portion of the
City is designated as an industrial and commercial area which contains the Raytheon campus,
Allied Signal complex, municipal golf course, the Los Angeles Air Force Base, and Continental
Park, a mixed -use complex of hotel, office, retail, theater and restaurant uses.
The area is currently developed with several abandoned greenhouse structures (see attached
photographs). The area is unpaved, contains no geologic features, and is a rectangular shape.
The topography of the site is level and soils conditions are suitable for the existing
development. Plant species present are those that are commonly used for landscaping
purposes or which have adapted to urban environments. There are no known rare or
endangered animal species associated with the Project site. The site contains no known
significant cultural, historical, or particularly scenic aspects.
Historically, the Specific Plan area has served as a right of way for Southern California Edison
(SCE) transmission lines and towers and is designated Open Space in the General Plan and
Zoning Code. The property had also been used for a commercial landscape nursery until 1997.
The Specific Plan area is proposed to continue to be used as a right -of -way for SCE lines and
towers, but is not proposed to be continued as a nursery.
The three properties owned by SCE, which would be leased to the City for park purposes,
include 1) 0.61 acres located on Washington Street between Walnut Avenue and Sycamore
Avenue; 2) 2.05 acres located on Illinois Street between Mariposa Avenue and Pine Avenue;
and, 3) 1 acre located on Illinois Street between Holly Avenue and Pine Avenue. These
properties are currently undeveloped.
SURROUNDING AREA
The adjacent land uses immediately northeast of the Specific Plan area are primarily office,
research & development, light manufacturing and warehouse /distribution, including the Xerox
Corporation. Across Aviation Boulevard, there are single family residential neighborhoods in
the City of Hawthorne; south of Rosecrans in the City of Manhattan Beach are industrial and
commercial uses, including the new Raleigh Manhattan Beach Studios. Southwesterly of the
Santa Fe Railroad tracks is Continental Park, a mixed -use complex that includes a hotel, a
sports club, restaurants, theaters, research and development, retail, and office buildings.
Surrounding land uses are as described in Table A.
87
TABLE A
SURROUNDING LAND USES
Land Use Zone
North: Manufacturing, Office, Light Industrial(M -1)
R &D
South: Office, hotel, restaurant, Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S)
health club
East: Residential Sing Family Residential (R -1)
City of Hawthorne
West: Office, R & D Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S)
Source: City of El Segundo
There are residential uses located approximately 150 feet east of the project, on the east side
of Aviation Boulevard. The project site is visible from Douglas Street, Aviation Boulevard, and
from the Douglas Street Metro Green Line station.
There are single - family residential (R -1) uses to the west of the three SCE properties to be
leased for park purposes and primarily Multi- family (R -3) properties to the east of these
properties. These three properties are designated Open Space in the El Segundo General Plan
and zoned Open Space (OS) in the Zoning Code.
CODE CONSIDERATIONS
Specific Plan
Section 65450 of the State Government Code authorizes Cities to adopt specific plans for the
systematic implementation of the General Plan for all or part of the area covered by the General
Plan. A specific plan is a regulatory plan, which will serve as the zoning ordinance for the
Property within its boundaries. It establishes the permitted uses and development standards
that apply only to the area covered by the plan. Proposed development plans, subdivisions and
other development approvals within the project area must be consistent with the specific plan.
Projects consistent with an adopted specific plan are automatically deemed to be consistent
with the General Plan.
The adoption of a specific plan is a legislative act by the City Council, based upon
recommendations by the Planning Commission. There are no specific findings that must be
adopted for a Specific Plan. The City must, in approving a Specific Plan, make determinations
related to the following two (2) areas:
The California Environmental Quality Act; and,
2. The consistency of the action with the City's General Plan.
K3
wi
General Plan
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan includes a General Plan Amendment (GPA 97-4) to revise
the Land Use Map in order to depict the change in designation of the subject property from
Open Space to Aviation Specific Plan. This is similar to how the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan
designation of Smoky Hollow Mixed -Use is currently depicted on the General Plan Land Use
Map. Additional modfications to the General Plan are proposed to reflect the elimination' of the
property from the Private Open Space and Recreational Facilities inventory in the Open Space
and Recreation Element (Chapter 6). The Aviation Specific Plan proposes a maximum Floor
Area Ratio of 0.22:1. The current Open Space designation does not contain a maximum Floor
Area Ratio, since the Open Space Land Use Designation does not anticipate that enclosed
structures would be built.
The redesignation of the project area from Open Space to Aviation Specific Plan will eliminate
5.4 acres of land in the private Open Space and Recreational Facilities inventory. The General
Plan contains Land Use Element Policy LU6 -1.3 to utilize power line rights -of -way for
recreational, open space, and beautification purposes and Open Space Element Objective
OS1 -4 to "Develop utility transmission corridors for active and passive open space and
recreational uses." Adoption of the proposed Specific Plan would reduce the number of utility
corridors for future open space use by converting the use to a commercial mini - storage use.
However, due to the configuration and location of the property, it does not currently provide a
useable amenity for the community. The property has limited street frontage on Douglas Street
and Aviation Boulevard. It is currently fenced and inaccessible to the public. Landscaping along
the Aviation Boulevard frontage effectively hides the rest of the property from view from the
street. Conversion of the property to a mini - storage use would not significantly reduce a usable
open space area. Additionally, there are no residential communities in El Segundo in close
proximity to the Specific Plan area to support a public open space use. Consequently, staff
believes that approval of the proposed Specific Plan would be consistent with the intent of the
Land Use Policy and Open Space objectives and policies of the General Plan. Approval of the
Development Agreement will provide the City the opportunity to increase the inventory of park
and recreation facilities in the residential portion of the City by leasing three properties totaling
3.66 acres of SCE utility corridor for park purposes. These properties are currently vacant lots,
which provide only a limited amenity to the City.
zoning Code
The application also includes a request to amend the Zoning Map to show the change in Zoning
from Open Space (O -S) to Aviation Specific Plan (ASP). This is required to ensure that the
Zoning Map is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map. The proposed Specific Plan
contains a set of new development standards which would apply to the property. These
standards are designed to reflect the proposed mini - storage facility depicted in the attached
plans. The development standards have been written to incorporate the Light - industrial (M -1)
Zone development standards when the Specific Plan does not directly address a subject.
Development Agreement
The three SCE properties to be leased to the City through the proposed Development
Agreement are currently zoned Open Space, which allows parks and recreational facilities as
permitted uses. The proposed terms of the Development Agreement would grant the City a
License to use the properties for park purposes. The City would have six months from the
approval of the Development Agreement to exercise the lease offer. The purpose of the
• /
•
Development Agreement is to obtain the right to lease the property, but not to determine the
types of recreational facilities will be provided. The City has not developed detailed specific
plans for the future design of these parks. The El Segundo Department of Recreation and
Parks will develop the design of the park facilities and the City's Recreation and Parks
Commission will review those for the new park areas. Final plans will be subject to the approved
of the City Council. Public input on the design of the parks will be provided through the
Recreation and Parks Commission and City Council review process. On October 20, 1999, staff
received a letter (attached) from fourteen (14) residents who live near the proposed park areas
suggesting provisions for the design of the parks to insure compatibility with the residential
areas. This letter has been forwarded to the Department of Recreation and Parks for its review.
Section 65864 of the California Government Code authorizes the City to enter into
Development Agreements with property owners to ensure projects may be built in accordance
with the applicable policies, rules, and regulations at the time of approval of the project. A
Development Agreement may specify the duration of the Agreement, permitted uses of the
property, and provisions for dedications of land for public purposes. The proposed Development
Agreement sets an 8 -year duration of the Agreement, established the Aviation Specific Plan as
the project which is being entitled, and includes an offer from the property owner to grant a
roadway easement for public purposes.
The Planning Commission is authorized by City Council Resolution No. 3268 to make a
recommendation to the City Council to approve a Development Agreement if the following
findings can be made:
1. The project is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs
specified in the general plan and any applicable specific plan;
2. The project is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for,
the land use district in which the real property is located;
3. The project is in conformity with the public convenience, general welfare and good land
use practice;
4. The project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare; and
5. The project will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the
preservation of property values.
There are a few provisions in the proposed Development Agreement, which will require
additional negotiations and revisions before being presented to the City Council for
consideration. These items are not related to planning or land use issues. They are technical
issues regarding the definitions and extent of the easements, details for the proposed $250,000
bond, the proposed park lease, and City initiated soil testing in the road easement.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
The project Draft Initial Study and plans were circulated to all inter - departmental staff and their
Directors, the C ty Manager, the Building Safety D Division, and Department of R,
comments e e Economic Development, Finance bra Li ry
Parks had no comments on the project. and
eation and
41
5
The Police Department provided comments (see attached memo) related to crime prevention,
which included recommendations for security lighting and cameras, access, landscaping, building
security, and hours of operation. These recommendations have been incorporated into Draft
Resolution No. 2432 as conditions of approval.
The Fire Department also indicated to staff that emergency access from Aviation Boulevard
would be required since there is insufficient area on -site to accommodate the turning radius of
emergency vehicles which would normally access the site from Douglas Street. The plans have
been revised since this comment was made to make Aviation Boulevard the primary access. As
a result, the plans have been developed to accommodate emergency access from Douglas
Street during the initial phase and post - Douglas Street roadway extension phase.
The City Engineer commented that a bridge originally proposed to connect the two sides of the
property when the Douglas Street underpass is constructed, should be designed and
constructed at the applicants expense and not at the City's expense. During negotiations
between the City and the property owner, Southern California Edison, in conjunction with the
associated Development Agreement for the project (EA -470, DA 99 -1), both parties agreed that
a bridge across the proposed roadway underpass would not be necessary. Instead a 16 -20 foot
wide at -grade access road parallel to the Douglas Street extension would be developed, for
SCE and other maintenance and emergency vehicles to gain access to the Specific Plan area
and the railroad tracks from Douglas Street.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Draft Initial Study was prepared by staff for the project, which identified potential adverse
environmental impacts related to land use planning, water, transportation/circulation, hazards, and
aesthetics. No significant adverse environmental impacts were identified which could not be
mitigated to an insignificant level, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts
is proposed. The Draft Initial Study was circulated for inter - departmental and affected public
agency review and comments, as required by City Council Resolution No. 3805 and State CEQA
guidelines. All departments have concurred with the staff recommendation to approve a Mitigated
Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. All of the mitigation measures, as detailed in the
Draft Initial Study and in the Interdepartmental comments section of this report, have been
incorporated into the conditions of approval of Draft Resolution No. 2432.
STAFF ANALYSIS
Overall comments related to the request are presented below
It is the opinion of City staff that the requested actions of the City are within the broad scope of
the development limits approved by the General Plan Environmental Impact Report. In addition,
the draft Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration related to environmental effects for the
proposed Specific Plan indicates that there will be no significant environmental impacts
resulting from the adoption of the Aviation Specific Plan.
9i
2. The Application request is consistent with the City's General Plan
State law authorizes the City to adopt specific plans in order to implement the General Plan.
The proposed General Plan Amendment would redesignate the project area from Open space
to Aviation Specific Plan. Therefore, the Specific Plan will be consistent with the new land use
designation in the General Plan. The maximum proposed floor area ratio would allow a total
buildout of approximately 66,000 square feet in the plan areas. This amount of additional floor
area, against the background of a total buildout of approximately 56,000,000 square feet in the
existing General Plan (Exhibit LU -3) is insignificant. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan is
consistent with the City's 1992 General Plan.
Traffic Analysis
A Traffic Report was prepared for the proposed Aviation Specific Plan. The Traffic Reporl
estimated that the traffic generation for the proposed use would (at maximum build -out) be a
total of 146 trips per day based on Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) rates for a mini - storage
project size of approximately 60,000 square feet. Eight trips are projected for the morning peak
hour and 3 trips in the evening peak hour. The previous nursery use in the Specific Plan area,
by comparison, if it operated as a retail nursery would have been expected to generate
approximately 647 trips on a daily basis (based on ITE rates) with 17 trips in the morning peak
hour and 50 trips in the evening peak hour. Since the previous nursery did operate more as a
wholesale nursery and growing grounds, the actual trip generation would likely have been much
lower. Comparing the trip generation for a retail nursery and the proposed Aviation Specific
Plan indicates that the Specific Plan would generate 501 fewer trips on a daily basis, nine fewer
trips in the morning peak hour and 47 fewer trips in the evening peak hour. The Traffic Report
also analyzed the impacts of the project on the Level of Service of the intersection of Aviation
Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue and found that the project would not impact the utilization of
the intersection.
The operation of the proposed project may be affected by planned future roadway improvement
plans. The City is planning to construct a roadway connecting the southern terminus of Douglas
Street to the northern terminus of the street on the south side of the railroad tracks. This
connection is one of the missing road links identified in the Circulation Element of the General
Plan necessary to complete the Master Plan of Streets. This would involve constructing an
underpass beneath the Burlington Northern /Santa Fe railroad tracks and the con Green Line
right -of -way. The California Public Utilities Commission has denied the City's request for an at-
grade crossing of the railroad tracks several times. The future construction of the underpass will
bisect the Specific Plan area, resulting in a reduction of useable land in the project area. The
Specific Plan incorporates two proposed site plans, representing the extent a the development
before and after the roadway construction.
The City's Traffic Engineer, Hartzog & Crabill, Inc., has expressed some reservation regarding
the use of Aviation Boulevard for the sole public access to the project. This concern is due to
the close proximity of the proposed access driveway to the Rosecran Avenue /Aviation
Boulevard intersection and the minor potential conflict in turning m s ovements between vehicles
entering and existing the proposed project and traffic on Aviation Boulevard. Staff shares these
concerns, but believes that because the traffic analysis indicates that the total daily and peak
hour traffic generation will be very low, any significant safety or circulation impacts will be
avoided. Additionally, once the Douglas Street extension is constructed, there would be no
other feasible public access point for the Specific Plan area.
7 QZ
The property would also be impacted by the planned widening of the intersection of Rosecrans
Avenue and Aviation Boulevard. The location of the rental office has been designed to be set
back far enough from Aviation Boulevard to accommodate the future roadway width. The City
(through the City of Hawthorne as lead agency on the project and the County of Los Angeles as
right -of -way agent) is currently in negotiations with SCE to purchase the necessary Aviation
Boulevard right -of -way.
The Development Agreement is a necessary part of the proposed project in order to insure that
the City has the ability to progress toward completion of its Master Plan of Streets. The City is
actively pursuing funding to enable construction of the Douglas Street extension to begin as
soon as possible. The extension is depicted on the General Plan Circulation Element. Master
Plan of Streets. Since this roadway would have to bisect the Specific Plan Area, negotiations
with SCE as the property owner, in the context of the requested land use entitlement for the
Everest Storage was the logical means to address the future needs of the City. As proposed in
the Development Agreement, the City, by granting approval of the Aviation Specific Plan, would
be granted an easement, at no cost, to accommodate the planned roadway. In exchange for
the loss of open space as a result of the conversion of the Specific Plan area from relatively
passive use open space to a commercial land use designation, SCE has agreed through the
Development to lease three properties totaling 3.66 acres of transmission corridor land to the
City. These properties would be developed by the City, at its own expense into active park and
recreation facilities for the use of the whole community. Staff believes this is an acceptable
trade -off for the reduction in future park and/or recreational facilities on the Specific Plan
property.
CONCLUSION
The attached Specific Plan, which you will find has been formatted to mirror the organization of
the Zoning Code, establishes the goals, policies, uses and development standards, which will
be used for future administration of the project. Staff recommends that the adoption of the
Aviation Specific Plan and accompanying General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Zone Text
Amendment, and Development Agreement.
EXHIBITS
1
4. Maps of Park Properties
5. Draft Rediine /Strikeout Revisions to Chapter 20.16
6. Memos from Police Department, dated February 4 and October 6, 1998
7. Traffic Analysis, dated January 14, 1998
8. Draft Initial Study /Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts, EA -427
9. Draft Initial Study /Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts, EA -470
10. Applications
11. Photographs of Site
12. Letter from residents, dated October 14, 1999
13. Plans
W
Prepared by:
Paul Garry
Assistant Planner
Revi ed by:
Laurie B. Jester,
Senior Planner
Approved by:
J Hansen
e M.
1 eri Director of Planning and Building Safety
p:\projects \425- 450\ea427\ea427.s r12. doc
9
94
ss 117 I 11987 U
"WALNUT
so
So .e of '. r-- -•— •�/1v{,a...F . >..
s.er+ra�. >,y
U) _ /oo
'n
6
IS a/ a O ti a 40
y fn A . �. m v o + QD
7
LBO Ac
0 ✓) e�c„I 3
rre+ b /.72rAC 2
3 • e suc.
107 tt
): g O O N
E c. :r..v
SYCAMORE. h 4
AVE. �SYCAMO { n ti AVE. 4
7o.7a n c9.9) M-w - w 4138
o M u I ®b b I b 1 I
to I6 'g. ©
O
I I b V I a i$
z 94.91
r7 L _ ._ At >
Z 13 I ®I 15 I e� .xorr w
1
= 9 „ I I • aI -J
y
MAPLE
i
Qu IB
CODE EL SEGUNDO PROPERTY OF SOUTHERN_ .CAILIFORNI E DISON CO
COD
M.B. 20 -114 -115
FOR RRfV ASSbYT. SEE: O.M. 'MAP-NO. -] °•I.7 8
aIJ9 -q
q5
26
ODE
1710
_(i3
° $ MARIPOSA
ar.r lssJ rir r� sr sau I
Sf H rtrr is
I I
ai
Its I ® i g l h h% IV
/s I I I�I� m
Jl ...r
�I "I'r
� s P/ O a . • t >•rs
- -- -- — - - - -- • 03,
221 . _
z ♦s - -- BLK.&V 11123 ° ?
o$ - - -- rs — — - -
u 170 O t-
I :s, - - - - -- ° I
aall lJ I H � /I,ll /B F •S
r '-F PINE F
I!J ° /!,N
N ♦ - - -- @T(
2J: 3 ® C
� © C
28
PARCEL MAP
P. M. 172.— 51
PROPERTY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SO. I--TD. MAP Na B _
0. M. 3— 1 -7
r. reev. assert SEE, EL SEGUNDO
19 - 29,30a32 M. B. 22 — 108— 107
s r
HIH
N
°
C N
I ..
n
t
ZY
h�
y=j
3
N y
MI
l.I ll
N �
u~1
O
Z
0
i�
N
24
IWE. y
1p
r
25
N
2
J
J
N
P�
1 /NEE
N
2S
CC
Qf
�r
O
-
- - --
- --
ilJ
,
O
IAII °
•
A/Y4
PARCEL MAP
P. M. 172.— 51
PROPERTY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SO. I--TD. MAP Na B _
0. M. 3— 1 -7
r. reev. assert SEE, EL SEGUNDO
19 - 29,30a32 M. B. 22 — 108— 107
s r
HIH
N
°
C N
I ..
n
t
ZY
h�
y=j
3
N y
MI
l.I ll
N �
u~1
O
Z
0
i�
N
24
IWE. y
1p
r
25
N
2
J
J
N
P�
1 /NEE
N
2S
CC
Qf
EA- 427 /GPA 97-42C 97 -32TA 98-6
DRAFT AMENDMENTS - OCTOBER 14, 1999
AVIATION SPECIFIC PLAN - EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 20.16 ZONES AND USES
Sections:
20.16.010 DESIGNATION OF ZONE NAMES.
20.16.020 s " ^'r° H)L , SPECIFIC PLAN ZONES.
20.16.030 ZONING MAP- BOUNDARIES.
20.16.040 ZONING MAP- DIVISION.
20.16.050 BOUNDARIES- CHANGES - UNCERTAINTY.
20.16.010 DESIGNATION OF ZONE NAMES
In order to classify, regulate, restrict and segregate the uses of lands and buildings,
to regulate and restrict the height and bulk of buildings, to regulate the area of
yards and other open spaces about buildings, and to regulate the density of
population, the classes of use zones are by this title established, to be known as
follows:
R -1 -
Single- Family Residential Zone.
R -2 -
Two - Family Residential Zone.
R -3 -
Multi - Family Residential Zone.
MDR -
Medium Density Residential Zone.
P -
Automobile Parking Zone.
C-RS -
Downtown Commercial Zone.
C -2 -
Neighborhood Commercial Zone.
C -3 -
General Commercial Zone.
GAC -
Grand Avenue Commercial Zone.
CO_
Corporate Office Zone.
MU -N -
Urban Mixed -Use North Zone.
MU -S -
Urban Mixed -Use South Zone.
M -1 -
Light Industrial Zone.
M -2 -
Heavy Industrial Zone.
SB -
Small Business Zone.
MM - Medium Manufacturing Zone.
O-S_ Open Space Zone.
P-F - Public Facilities Zone.
PRD Planned Residential Development Zone. (Ord. 1272).
Page I of 3
97
EA- 427 /GPA 97-41ZC 97 -3/ZTA 98-6
DRAFT AMENDMENTS - OCTOBER 14, 1999
AVIATION SPECIFIC PLAN - EXHIBIT 2
20.16.020 8 ? #!E) iGEL -aW SPECIFIC PLAN ZONES.
In order to classify, regulate, restrict and segregate the uses of lands and buildings,
to regulate and restrict the height and bulk of buildings, to regulate the area of
yards and other open spaces about buildings and to regulate the density of
population, the City has adopted the following specific plan areas which function
as the Zoning Code for specific areas.
Smoky Hollow n pie fic P
There are four (4) classes of use zones are intended to be used within
the boundaries of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan. These zones
include:
GAC - Grand Avenue Commercial Zone.
MDR - Medium Density Residential Zone.
SB - Small Business Zone.
MM - Medium Manufacturing Zone.
2• 124th Street pe & P1an
There is one (1) use zone intended to be used within the boundaries of
the 124th Street Specific Plan. This zone is:
124th SP - 124th Street Specific Plan Zone.
Aviation Specific Plan
There i on (1) U129992 intended to b . a i hi
I e Aviation Specific Pla.+ Thic �nnP
ASP _ Aviation Specific Plan 9200.
The foregoing Zones are separate Zones and shall not be deemed to be more
restrictive or less restrictive than any other Zone, but shall be limited to the uses
Permitted in the specified Zone.
20.16.030 ZONING MAP - BOUNDARIES.
The location and boundaries of the various zones are such as are shown and
delineated on the Zoning Map of the city, which map is a part of this title when
adopted by ordinance passed by the City Council in the manner prescribed by law.
Page 2 of 3
..
EA- 427 /GPA 97-42C 97 -32TA 98-6
DRAFT AMENDMENTS - OCTOBER 14, 1999
AVIATION SPECIFIC PLAN - EXHIBIT 2
20.16.040 ZONING MAP - DIVISION.
The Zoning Map may, for convenience, be divided into parts and each such part
may, for purposes of more readily identifying areas within the Zoning Map, be
subdivided into units and the parts and units may be separately employed for
purposes of amending the Zoning Map or for any official reference to the Zoning
Map.
20.16.050 BOUNDARIES - CHANGES - UNCERTAINTY.
Changes in the boundaries of the zones shall be made by ordinance adopting an
amended Zoning Map, part of the map or unit of a part of the Zoning Map, which
amended maps or parts or units of parts, when so adopted, shall be published in
the manner prescribed by law and become a part of this title.
Where uncertainty exists as to the boundaries of any zone shown upon a zoning
map or any part or unit thereof, the following rules shall apply:
A. Where the boundaries are indicated as approximately following street and
alley lines or lot lines, the lines shall be construed to be the boundaries;
B. In the case of unsubdivided property and where a zone boundary divides a
lot, the location of the boundaries, unless the same are indicated by
dimensions, shall be determined by use of the scale appearing on the
Zoning Map;
C. Where a public street or alley is officially vacated or abandoned, the area
comprising the vacated street or alley shall acquire the classification of the
Property to which it reverts; and,
D. Areas of dedicated streets or alleys and railroad rights -of- -way, other than
such as are designated on the Zoning Map as being classified in one of the
zones provided in this title, shall be deemed to be unclassified and, in the
case of streets, permitted to be used only for purposes lawfully allowed
and, in the case of railroad rights -of- -way, permitted to be used solely for
the purpose of accommodating tracks, signals, other operative devices and
the movement of rolling stock.
Page 3 of 3
1
Inter- Departmental Correspondence
February 4,1998
To: Development Services Group
From: Laurie Risk, Crime Prevention Specialist
Subject: Everest Storage L�_p _q7
IFEB 41996�IJ1
The Police Department has reviewed the plans for Everest S
two other storage facilities in EI Segundo, each experiencing 101,1
crime problems, there are some security issues we are concerned with. We are also
taking into consideration the location, past criminal activity in the area and the lack
of visibility of the facility.
Is there a need for public access off Douglas street? This entry should be
closed at all times and any entry should be for emergency vehicles only. If it
is kept for public access there should be controlled access (key card or keypad
access).
A portion of the perimeter appears to be secured by chain link fencing. Due
to the attraction of burglars to these types of facilities, it would be recom-
mended that the perimeter fencing be replaced by wrought iron fencing, a
minimum of 6 ft high with any cross sections approximately four inches from
the top and bottom.
Landscaping should be low profile so as to not limit visibility into and
between the storage areas. Ground cover landscaping should be used at the
entrance off Aviation so as to not limit visibility of on coming cars when
exiting Aviation.
- Will the storage area be closed off by a fence after business hours? There
should be a gate closing off access from Aviation with controlled access for
customers. To best serve the purpose, this gate should enclose the office
building too.
The office building shall have security hardware as recommended by the
police department after review of the details.
Due to the enormous number of burglaries to our other storage facilities,
Everest storage bin door shall have a double locking system (one which
Prevents entry by cutting the lock). Roll up doors should be constructed of a
heavy metal gauge to deter persons with criminal intent from cutting the
door to gain unlawful entry.
Security cameras should be installed to monitor AND record all sections of
the storage areas, parking and office building and entry/exit gates.
100
/ Everest Storage .
Page Two
- Exterior lighting should be a b
minimum of 2 foot candles to provide
maximum visibility for natural surveillance.
Trash bins should be enclosed by either wrought iron gates or a combination
of block walls and wrought iron gate with a light standard over or closely
located near the trash bin.
Traffic Division:
Expand driveway on Aviation to 32' -35' for truck turning radius
Right turn only out of driveway.
101
f eyes ran aw
Inter - Departmental Correspondence
October 6. 1998
To: Bret B. Bernard, AICP, Director Of Planning and Building Safety
From: Laurie Risk, Crime Prevention Specialist
Subject: Everest Storage
On August 31, 1998, the Police Department met with Everest Storage to finalize
the security recommendations made in the memo dated February 4, 1998.
Trash bins will be enclosed by either wrought iron gates or a combination of
block walls and wrought iron gate with a light standard over or closely
located near the trash bin.
There will be a steel tubular rolling gate off Aviation Blvd. This gate will be
for "Emergency Exit" only.
Entry to facility will be off Douglas.
Chauilmk fencing will be extended from 6 feet to 8 feet.
Operating hours will be from 7a m. to 7p.m., customers will not be able to
access storage bins from 7p.m. to 7a.m.
The office building will be alarmed.
Cylinder locks with be provided for storage bins or the customer can bring
their own.
Camera locations: 1 in the office; 1 at the gate; 1
1 to view customer; punching in code entry and
1
enter and exit.
to 2 throughout the facility.
capturing vehicles as they
Landscaping will be low profile, using ground cover as much as possible, so
as to not limit visibility into and between the storage areas. This in any
facility.
landscaping along chainlink fencing which would limit visibility into the
Exterior lighting should be a minimum of 1 to 2 foot candles to provide
maximum visibility for natural surveillance.
The office building shall have security hardware (i.e. latch guards on glass
entry door;, dead bolts locks, etc.)
102
��❑ Fimley -Hom
and Associates, Inc.
January 14, 1998
Mr. Barry Adnams
CCA Associates, Inc.
1535 Monrovia Avenue
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Subject: Traffic Analysis for Everest Storage in the City of El Segundo
Dear Mr. Adnams:
This letter addresses the traffic analysis conducted for the Everest Storage
facility proposed to be built in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of
Rosecrans Avenue and Aviation Boulevard in the City of El Segundo.
Project Description
CCA Associates, Inc. proposes to construct a self-storage facility at the
northwest comer of Rosecrans Avenue and Aviation Boulevard in the City of El
Segundo. The facility is proposed to consist of 60,910 square feet of
storage/office space with 350 storage units. Access to the site would be via one
driveway on Aviation Boulevard on the east end of the site. An additional
access is proposed for emergency access via Douglas Street on the west end of
the site. The site is currently vacant. Previously a nursery had been in business
on the 6.73 -acre property. A site plan for the proposed self- storage facility is
presented on Figure 1.
Trip Generation
Daily and peak hourly trips for the proposed self - storage facility were estimated
using trip rates per the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trio n -_
publication (5th Edition), Category 151: Mini - Warehouse. ITE Category 151:
Mini - Warehouse, is based on six studies conducted in San Francisco and San
Diego. Trip rates and the trips estimated to be generated by the proposed project
facility swou d generate 1466 trips on daily basis with 9 trips in the morning
Peak hour and 3 trips in the evening peak hour.
TEL 714 939 1g70
FAX 714 979 go
Suits 140
2100 W. Onemwood Awmue
Ormp. cesronu,
92668
103
I�
A�1':i......JAN 2 10
7
,4N
C]—❑ IGmley -Horn
M and Associates, Inc. Mr' 8i"I Ate• pose 2, January 14,199S
Daily and peak hour trips for the nursery, previously on the site, were also
estimated using the ITE rates (Category 917) and arc presented on Table 1. By
comparison, the nursery on the site generated 647 trips on a daily basis with 17
trips in the morning peak hour and 50 trips in the evening peak hour. Comparing
the trip generation for the nursery and the proposed self - storage uses indicates
that the self-storage facility would generate 501 fewer trips on a daily basis, 9
fewer trips in the morning peak hour and 47 fewer trips in the evening peak
hour. However, the nursery took access to the roadway system via the northern
section of Douglas Street and had little or no impact at the intersection of
Rosecrans Avenue and Aviation Boulevard. Therefore, the total project traffic
for the self - storage facility will be added to existing traffic at the intersection of
Rosecrans Avenue and Aviation Boulevard.
Trip Distribution and Assignment
Distribution of project traffic was based on the spatial orientation of trip
attractors and producers. Distribution percentages are shown on Figure 2. Also
shown on Figure 2 is the assignment of the morning and evening peak hour
project traffic to the surrounding roadway system.
Intersection Analysis
The intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and Aviation Boulevard was analyzed for
morning and eve_ ning peak hour operation without and with the proposed self.
storage facility. Peak hour counts were conducted in December 1997, Count
worksheets are provided as an attachment to this letter. Existing morning and
evening peak hour volumes without and with the self - storage facility are
presented on Figure 2.
The intersection was analyzed using the Intersection Capacity Methodology.
ICU worksheets are provided as an attachment. The ICU analysis indicates that
the intersection currently operates at LOS F in the morning and evening peak
hours, with ICU values of 1.17 in the moming peak hour and 1.67 in the evening
peak hour.
The addition of project traffic to existing traffic volumes does not cause the
intersection to worsen to unacceptable levels of service in the morning or
evening peak hours or even increase the ICU value. Project traffic represents
approximately 0.09% of the total traffic at the intersection in the morning peak
hour and 0.03% in the evening peak hour. Because of the very small amount of
traffic Everest Storage would add (6 trips in the morning peak and 3 trips in the
evening peak), the project would not have an impact at the intersection of
Rosecrans Avenue and Aviation Boulevard.
Committed Improvements
Conversation with Department of Public Works staff at the City of Hawthorne
indicated that improvements at the intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and
Aviation Boulevard have been planned and are fully funded, with the City of
104
E
0
C..� IOmley -Horn
and Associates, Inc. Mr. Barry AIMS. p n,
3• Iaury 14, 1998
Hawthorne taking the lead on the improvement project. Improvements at the
intersection include dual left turn lanes on the northbound, southbound and
eastbound approaches (dual lefts already exist on the westbound approach),
exclusive right turn lanes on the northbound and southbound approaches, and
additional through lanes on the southbound, eastbound and westbound
approaches.
City of Hawthorne staff indicated that widening at the intersection is expected to
begin in late 1998 or early 1999 and construction of the improvements at the
intersection is expected to take approximately six months to one year. The City
of Hawthorne also indicated that the improvements are fully funded, with the
bulk of the improvements funded by a Proposition C discretionary grant through
the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Other funding
sources include the flexible state congestion relief funds, the Cities of
Hawthorne, El Segundo and Manhattan Beach, and donated right -of -way by a
number of businesses in the immediate vicinity of the intersection.
As mentioned earlier, the ICU analysis indicated that the intersection operates at
LOS F in the morning and evening peak hours, with ICU values of 1.17 and
1.67, respectively. The intersection was evaluated with the committed
improvements and the ICU calculations result in LOS D in the morning peak
hour (ICU of 0.84) and LOS F in the evening peak hour (ICU of 1.05).
Project Access
Vehicular access to the self-storage facility would be via one driveway on
Aviation Boulevard on the east end of the site. The driveway is located
approximately 200 feet north of Rosecrans Avenue and is proposed to allow
right - turn -in, right -turn-out movements only.
An additional access is proposed for emergency vehicle use via Douglas Street
on the west end of the site. Douglas Street is a north -south roadway extending
from Rosecrans Avenue north and terminating at the Green Line tracks, just
south of the proposed project's property line. Douglas Street resumes just north
of the railroad tracks and continues to the north. The emergency access would
be via the northern section of Douglas Street.
The City of El Segundo has considered constructing an at -grade crossing of the
railroad to connect the two ends
the City's Master Plan of Streets. of Douglas Street. This roadway link is part of
But an at -grade crossing has not been
approved by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). If an at -grade crossing is
constructed, it would be possible to continue to provide emergency access to
Everest Storage via Douglas Street.
If a grade - separated railroad crossing is ultimately constructed, emergency
access via Douglas Street would likely be infeasible at the west end of the
project site. An alternative emergency access location could possibly be located
via a connection through existing businesses on Hawaii Street, if arrangements
can be made with one of the property owners. Hawaii Street runs generally
105
C'=0 10MI" 6Horn
and Associates, Inc. Mr, BR"Y Ad1lm. P*p 4, Jay 14, 199s
parallel to the project site, on its northeast side. It is not likely that emergency
access could be provided on the southwest side of the project site, as the railroad
tracks are located immediately adjacent to the site, and numerous buildings are
adjacent to the tracks.
Since the timing for a grade separation of Douglas Street at the railroad is not
known, it is suggested that emergency access via Douglas Street be provided for
Everest Storage on an interim basis, with the stipulation that Everest Storage
must make other arrangements for emergency access at such time as a grade
separation is constructed.
Site Circulation
Circulation for the storage facility is proposed to be one long drive aisle
extending the length of the site, with 25 short drive aisles between each storage
unit building.
Parking
A parking analysis was conducted for the proposed storage facility to address the
adequacy of the number of on -site spaces to be provided. The City of El
Segundo parking code was used to compute the number of parking spaces that
would be required by the proposed land use.
For storage building uses, the City parking code requires one space per thousand
square feet for the first 20,000 square feet, one space per 2,000 square feet for
the second 20,000 SF, and one space per 4,000 square feet for the area in excess
of 40,000 square feet. In addition, the parking code requires 1 space for each
300 square feet of office space. Application of this rate would result in a code
requirement of 38 parking spaces on -site. The applicant proposes to provide 7
spaces adjacent to the storage facility office as well as parking adjacent to each
individual storage unit for the proposed self- storage facility. This amount of
parking would be adequate when compared to City requirements.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate
to call.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATEES, INC.
Herman Basmaciyan, P.E. v
Vice President
cc: Ms. Patricia Stitzenberger, Urban Planning Consultants
evemsdir
106
iA
:s::sal
\
pp !
y! !
1
e s
J+
��311i F Ils�i
i
! 1
\ d[�
lit
/
�z
as
W ti
E
e
S
e
8
s
107
All
-�
Table I
Summary of Trip Generation
Trips generation rates are per the rM Trip Generation publication (5th Edition) Category g 17
(Nursery) and 151 (Mini - Warehouse).
KSF = Thousand Square Feet
108
Trip Generation Rata
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Land Use
Trips per;
Daily
In Out
In
Out
Existing: Nursery
Acre
96.21
1.53 1.02
3.695
3.695
Proposed: Self- Storage
KSF
2.40
0.06 0.06
0.03
z
0.02
Project Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Land Use
Units
Daily
In Out
10
Out
Existing: Nursery
6.73 acres
647
10 7
25
25
Proposed: Self- Storage
60.91 KSF
146
4 4
2
I
Difference
-501
-6
Trips generation rates are per the rM Trip Generation publication (5th Edition) Category g 17
(Nursery) and 151 (Mini - Warehouse).
KSF = Thousand Square Feet
108
EXISTING TRAFFIC
AVE
XX/W - AM/PM
XX/YY - AMAW INBOUND
JUM -AWM WIBOIID,
NON . NOMINAL
EVEREST STORAGE
TRIP ASSIGNMENT GNMENT
AVE
EVEREST STORAGE
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
LID
XX/(YY) . KBOUNDAOUTBOUND)
NOM . NOMINAL
EIISTING PLUS PR06ECT TRAFFIC
FIGURE 2
TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT ROSECRANS /AVIATION
AVE
XX/YY . AM^
and Aeroeiole.
109
AVIATION SPECIFIC PLAN
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA -427
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 97 -4
ZONE CHANGE 97 -3
OCTOBER 8, 1998
Prepared by.
City of El Segundo
Department of Planning and Building Safety
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90246
(310) 322 -4670
110
SECTION 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Aviation Specific Plan area is roughly rectangular 5.4 acre narrow corridor of land oriented in
a generally northwest to southeast diagonal between Aviation Boulevard and Douglas Street. The
elevated MTA Green Line and the at -grade Santa Fe Railroad track border the Specific Plan area
on the southwest. Historically, the Specific Plan area has served as a right of way for Southern
California Edison transmission lines and towers and is designated Open Space in the General Plan
and Zoning Code. The property had also been used for a commercial landscape nursery until 1997
Plan
The Specific Plan area will continue to be used as a right of -way for Southern California Edison lines
and towers, but is not proposed to be continued as a nursery.
The Aviation Specific Plan area encourages primarily Warehouse and Storage uses in the entire
planning area, specifically with a one story, 350 unit mini - storage facility (60,910 square feet)
proposed, with limited ancillary and support uses. The study area shall be redesignated from the
current Open Space (OS) to Aviation Specific Plan (ASP) in the General Plan and Zoning Code.
SECTION 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan project is located within the southeast portion of the City of El
Segundo, with convenient access to the San Diego (1 -405) Freeway and Glenn Anderson (I -105)
Freeway. The Douglas Street Metro Green Line Station abuts the site. This portion of the City is
Signal r complex, themunicipal o golf course, )the lUS Air Forcecontains ase, and Continental ntal Park, emilxl d
use complex of hotel, office, retail, theater and restaurant uses.
The area is currently developed with several abandoned greenhouse structures. Th
Open Space (OS). e area is
unpaved, contains no geologic features, and is a rectangular shape. The area is currently zoned as
The adjacent land uses immediately northeast of the Specific Plan area are primarily office, research
& development, light manufacturing and warehouse /distribution, including the Xerox Corporation.
Across Aviation Boulevard, there are single family residential neighborhoods x the City of
Hawthorne; south of Rosecrans in the City of Manhattan Beach are industrial and commercial uses,
including the new Raleigh Manhattan Beach Studios. Southwesterly of the Santa Fe Railroad tracks
is Continental Park, a mixed use complex that includes a hotel, a sports club, restaurants, theaters,
research and development, retail, and office buildings.
There are no known endangered plant species associated with the proposed Specific Plan area and
none that are known to be associated with the immediate locale. Similarly, there are no known rare
or endangered animal species associated with the area or its locale. No known animal life is located
in the area. Further, there are no known cultural, historic, or scenic resources of recognized value
located within the Specific Plan area nor in the immediate vicinity.
SECTION 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Reproduced as Appendix I is the City of Ell Segundo Initial Study and Checklist provided under the
2
1Ii
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The purpose of these documents
to identify and evaluate potential adverse environmental impacts. The checklist consists of
background information, a list of environmental impacts, and a determination by the lead agency
of the projects potential impacts on the environment, and the type of CEQA document that will be
prepared. A discussion of the items checked on the form is located in Section 4.0.
SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
LAND USE PLANNING
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan will provide the land use policies and development standards
for the Plan area, replacing the current Open Space (O -S) Zoning. The Specific Plan is based on
a ten -year outlook for development and growth. The Specific Plan envisions a warehouse and
storage use with low density. Where the Specific Plan does not provide standards or guidelines,
the zoning for the Light Industrial (M -1) Zone shall apply.
The Aviation Specific Plan proposes a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 0.3:1. The current Open Space
designation does not contain a maximum Floor Area Ratio, since the Open Space Land Use
Designation does not anticipate that enclosed structures would built.
The Specific Plan area would eliminate a passive use open space area in a portion of the City with
limited open space. However, due to the configuration and location of the property, it does not
provide a useable amenity for the community. The property has limited street frontage on Douglas
Street and Aviation Boulevard. It is currently fenced and inaccessible to the public. Landscaping
along the Aviation Boulevard frontage effectively hides the rest of the property from view from the
street. Conversion'of the property to a mini - storage use would not significantly reduce a usable open
space area. The proposed use is also compatible with the scale and use of the surrounding light
industrial (M -1) and Urban Mixed -Use (MU -S) Zones.
Conformance with the General Plan is a policy issue which is determined at the discretion of the
Planning Commission and the City Council. The Zoning and Municipal Codes incorporate many
requirements which will help to mitigate any potential General Plan conflicts such as landscaping,
underground utilities, Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies, water conservation and
storm water control.
As previously discussed, the land uses surrounding the Specific Plan area consist of office, light
industrial, research and development uses, a health club, restaurants and a hotel. The project is
not expected to produce significant impacts in the pattern or scale of existing development within
the Specific Plan area or in its vicinity. Additionally, there are no agricultural land uses or
established low- income or minority communities in the vicinity that could be impacted.
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING
In 1997, the City of El Segundo had a permanent population of approximately 16,250 and a daytime
population of approximately 75,000. This resident to employee ratio has contributed to a relatively
high demand for housing within the City. In 1996, a total of approximately 7,325 dwelling units
existed in El Segundo. All residences in the City are located west of Sepulveda Boulevard, while
non - residential uses are located predominantly to the east of Sepulveda Boulevard. The Specific
Plan area is located east of Sepulveda Boulevard and is surrounded by commercial and industrial
3
1.1 2
uses. The proposed Specific Plan would not alter the expected distribution of population.
Additionally, the proposed Specific Plan does not propose the development or demolition of
residential land uses, and would not directly generate permanent population growth in the City.
New development within the Specific Plan area will bring minimal new employment to the area, and
will not measurably add to the daytime population. No significant impact is foreseen in the proposed
Specific Plan.
3. GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan consists of 5.4 acres of partially developed land. The area is
essentially level, thus the potential for landslides and mudslides is non - existent. New development
within the plan area would require minimal grading and minimal changes in topography. Exposure
Of soils to additional erosion factors would also not be expected.
The issuance of a grading permit is a standard requirement in the City and will ensure slope stability
and erosion control during construction. There are no unique geological or physical features within
the Specific Plan area that would be impacted. The Specific Plan will not increase or change alluvial
deposits or erosion, either off- or on -site and will not modify any body of water as a result of erosion
or deposits. Compliance with local stone water and urban runoff regulations will also be required.
The Aviation Specific Plan area is located within the seismically active Southern California region;
therefore, as with any new development, site occupants would be subject to similar seismic risks
as other developments of a comparable size and use which are located in the vicinity of the Specific
Plan. However, no known geologic features exist on the Site, and no known active or potential active
faults are located on or near the proposed Plan area. The risk of surtace rupture due to faulting is
considered remote, as is the potential for ground failure or other seismic hazards. In addition, new
development within the Specific Plan area would comply with all applicable City building standards,
regulations and permit requirements as contained in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and the El
Segundo Municipal Code. Development within the Plan area would have a less than significant
impact on topography and soils, and would not expose people or property to significant geologic
hazards. No mitigation is required for the Aviation Specific Plan.
4. WATER
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan consists of 5.4 acres of unimproved land and is esseny
level. There is no paving or asphalt on the property to impede percolation of on -site water into the tiall
groundwater table. On -site surface water run -off is influenced by the existing topography of the
project site. No water conveyance structures (e.g., culverts) which are designed to convey on -site
surface water flows to off -site facilities, are currently located on -site. Surface flows which are not
absorbed on -site within the property drain off -site into adjacent surface streets and eventually to
storm drains which drain into the Pacific Ocean.
The Specific Plan area is located within an urbanized environment, and is not near any surface
water bodies or within a flood plain designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency or
in any area subject to flooding.
Development of the area would introduce urban contaminants (i.e. tire wear residue, oil and grease,
fertilizers, etc.) to the site which are not currently present. However, these are not expected to be
4
113
in sufficient quantities to degrade on -site surface water run -off or groundwater quality. Existing
absorption rates and drainage patterns would change, as proposed improvements (i.e. building,
surface parking lot, and driveways, etc.) would increase the amount of impervious surfaces
Presently located on -site. Proposed landscaped areas would permit some surface water absorption.
Given the increase in imperviousness, drainage volumes would increase, and surface water run -off
generated by new development in the Specific Plan area would continue to be collected by storm
drains located.atong Douglas Street and Rosecrans Avenue and directed via culverts to the Pacific
Ocean.
The Aviation Specific Plan requires that site run -off and absorption rates will be calculated and
analyzed by a licensed civil engineer who will develop a design to facilitate drainage via the existing
storm sewer system adjacent to the site. Any improvements will be required to be completed by
development applicants. An engineered drainage system of area inlets and catch basins should
accommodate anticipated runoff requirements within the existing storm sewer system. The Specific
Plan also regulates that new development will be required to comply with the r ys Storm Water and
Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Control Ordinance (No. 1235) and the Water Conserving
Landscape Ordinance (No.1194) and Resolution (No. 3No. A National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board may be
required because the site is more than 5 acres in size.
During construction the displacement of earth could temporarily cause a change in drainage
patterns. New patterns will be established once the project is completed. All runoff during and after
construction will be required to drain into storm drainage facilities in accordance with plans and
permits approved by the Departments of Planning and Building Safety and Public Works. Adjacent
properties will be protected from flooding and erosion in accordance with standard code
requirements.
Significant impacts to water availability are not anticipated in the Specific Plan area. While the
proposed development would represent a continuation of the region's urbanizing trend, it would not
result in significant impacts to ocean or groundwater quality, absorption rates, drainage patterns,
surface water run -off, or the amount of available water. There are no new impacts anticipated or
associated with the proposed extension and no mitigation beyond the standard permits is required.
5. AIR QUALITY
The land uses permitted in the Specific Plan area (warehouse and storage) would not be expected
to produce any significant changes in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the vicinity. The Specific
Plan permits a maximum building area of 70,567 square feet, based on a maximum floor area ratio
of 0.3:1. As a result of the proposed project, which would be approximately 60,000 square feet, air
emissions would fail below the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) CEQA
Air Quality Handbook thresholds (Table 6 -3) for significant air quality impacts. Therefore, there will
be no impact and no mitigation will be required for the construction and operation of the facilities.
6. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION
A Traffic Report was prepared for the proposed Aviation Specific Plan. The Traffic study estimated
that the traffic generation for the proposed use would be a total of 146 trips per day based on
Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) rates. Eight trips are projected for the morning peak hour and
3 trips in the evening peak hour. The previous nursery use in the Specific Plan area, by comparison,
%
1.1. q
If it operated as a retail nursery would have been expected to generate approximately 647 trips on
a daily basis (based on ITE rates) with 17 trips in the morning peak hour and 50 trips in the evening
peak hour. Since the previous nursery did operate more as a wholesale nursery and growing
grounds, the actual trip generation would likely have been much lower. Comparing the trip
generation for the nursery and the proposed Aviation Specific Plan indicates that the Specific Plan
would generate 501 fewer trips on a daily basis, nine fewer trips in the morning peak hour and 47
fewer trips in the evening peak hour. Based on a full build out of the Specific Plan area (70,567
square feet), as a mini - storage facility (worse case scenario) approximately 169 daily trips would be
generated, with 8 trips in the morning peak hour and 3 trips in the evening peak hour.
The capacity of the intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and Aviation Boulevard was also analyzed
in the Traffic Study. This intersection currently operates at a "F" Level of Service (LOS) in the
morning and evening peak hours. The proposed project would not increase the Intersection
Capacity Utilization above the current 1.17 level on the morning peak hour and 1.67 in the evening
peak hour. Therefore the traffic generation from the proposed Specific Pla
significant impact and no mitigation is necessary. n will not have a
Several roadway improvements which have been implemented since 1990 have contributed to the
generally decreased congestion at the Rosecrans Avenue /Aviation Boulevard intersection. The 1-
105 freeway and Metro Green Line have been completed, and Douglas and Nash Streets, north of
El Segundo Boulevard have been converted to a one -way couplet. These improvements, have
improved traffic flows around the Aviation Specific Plan area. Other planned roadway improvements
in the area (Aviation Boulevard widening) are expected to reduce the morning peak hour LOS to
level D (0.83 ICU) and a lower 1.05 ICU in the evening peak hour (still LOS F).
The proposed project will result in approximately 150 vehicle trips per day using Douglas Street at
its southern terminus as the sole access the Plan area. While this is not a significant impact, the City
is planning to construct a roadway connecting the two ends of Douglas Street. This would involve
constructing a underpass beneath the Santa Fe railroad tracks and the MTA Green Line right -of-
way. The Public Utilities Commission has denied the City's request for an at -grade crossing of the
railroad tracks several times. The future construction of the underpass will pass through the Specific
Plan area, resulting in a reduction of useable land in the Plan area. A separate bridge would have
to be constructed parallel to the railroad track over the new sunken roadway to facilitate access from
the mini - storage office on the northwest side of the property to the storage units on the southeast
side of the property for cars, SCE maintenance trucks, and emergency vehicles. During construction
of this roadway, which is currently unfunded, primary access to the Plan area would be taken from
Aviation Boulevard, instead of Douglas Street.
Based the above indicated factors, as well as other planned roadway improvements, the proposed
Aviation Specific Plan will not cause a significant traffic impact in the surrounding environmental
setting and circulation.
The proposed project will not produce significant impacts for vehicular, bicycle, rail, or pedestrian
safety and will not create any significant congestion impacts in the surrounding area. The Plan area
will provide all parking as required by the El Segundo Zoning Code. The Plan area will also provide
an emergency access to the project from Aviation Boulevard. Public access will not be permitted from
Aviation Boulevard, except during the construction of the planned Douglas Street road connection.
The project will be subject to the City's Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program adopted on May 21,
r9
115
1996 (Resolution No. 3969). The Fee program was established to provide a funding mechanism for
specified major traffic system mitigation and/or improvements, the demand for which is created by
such developments, in order to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the City and is residents.
The project will be assessed a fee based on the rate per PM peak hour number of vehicle trips
generated by the project. The Department of Public Works shall determine the precise trip generation
rate to utilize to calculate the applicable fee, which shall be payable prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the project.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
There are no known rare, unique or endangered plant or animal species associated with the
proposed Aviation Specific Plan area or within the immediate vicinity. Development if the Plan area
would include additional landscaping consisting of plant species which readily adapt to urban
environments and drought tolerant plant species as required by City regulations. Therefore, the
proposed Specific Plan will not produce significant changes to the number of rare or endangered
plant species in the project area (including trees, shrubs grass, crops, and micro flora).
The Specific Plan area and immediate locale are not known to contain any rare or endangered
animal species. Since the area is located within a highly developed urban area, the potential for
on-site ' t pen ironmen s Development in the Specific Plan only would represent a continuation a regional
urbanizing trend which has permanently altered wildlife habitat in the area. Given the very limited
animal life on -site, the proposed Aviation Specific Plan would not produce significant impacts to the
number of rare or endangered species or specimens in the project area, nor would result in
significant changes in the diversity of species, reduction in numbers, or deterioration of valuable
animal habitats. There are no know natural communities of wildlife, wetlands, or migration areas in
the Plan area.
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan would not impact the community with respect to the
consumption of renewable and non - renewable natural resources in the form of building materials
during construction, and water and fossil fuels during project operation. The Specific Plan area
currently has limited development, thus increase development on the site would result in a increase
in the consumption of natural resources including fossil fuels in the form of electricity and natural
gas; however, consumption is expected to be marginal and would be considered insignificant
relative to cumulative consumption volumes throughout the City of EI Segundo and the airport area
as a whole. Development in the Specific Plan area would be expected to consume natural
resources at relatively low rates, and impacts to energy and mineral resources would therefore be
to
considered insignificant. It is anticipated that existing supplies and infrastructure are adequate meet the potential additional demands for water and wastewater facilities. in addition, the uate to
Plan would comply with all applicable statutes and regulations set forth In the Uniform Building
Code, and all applicable State resource conservation measures.
Southern California Edison Company and the Gas Company are the suppliers of electricity and
natural gas to the Specific Plan area. Existing fuel supplies and infrastructure should be adequate
to meet the development needs. The proposed Specific Plan would comply with all applicable
statues and regulations sat forth by the respective energy companies, in addition to all applicable
State energy conservation measures. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan is not expected to
VI
jf5
result in significant increases in fossil fuel consumption or to produce any significant impacts upon
the use, extraction or conservation of any natural resources, and no mitigation is required.
9. HAZARDS
The Aviation Specific Plan anticipates that development would - utilize common cleaning solutions,
disposed of in accordance with applicable statutes. Although the use of these materials would be
considered an increase over existing circumstances since the site currently has minimal
development, the amount to be used represents a marginal increase and is considered insignificant
when compared to the total use of hazardous materials in the City and airport area as a whole.
Based on the amount of hazardous materials stored, the nature of the packaging, the materials
involved, and the Specific Plan's compliance with applicable regulations, the risk from development
in the plan area is considered minor. Based on the foregoing, the proposed Specific Plan will have
a less than significant impact regarding the use, disposal, or release of potentially hazardous
materials and no mitigation is required.
Currently, the Specific Plan area is accessible to emergency vehicles via Aviation Boulevard and
Douglas Street. Based on traffic volumes detailed in the original Specific Plan Traffic Impact Study,
no unmitigated traffic impacts are foreseen with development in the Specific Plan area. Evacuation
plans and procedures would be incorporated into building and site design. Therefore, the Aviation
Specific Plan is not expected to interfere with emergency response or evacuation plans and no
mitigation is required.
The Specific Plan area is located beneath high voltage electricity transmission lines operated by
Southern California Edison. Scientific studies conducted in the Unite ve d States and abroad ha
identified that exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMPs) associated with power lines could be
potentially hazardous to human health. However, there appears to be no conclusive body of
evidence to support a conclusion that the proposed land uses in the Aviation Specific Plan would
subject humans to EMPs that would be harmful. Additionally, the number of people (customers) that
potentially could be exposed to EMPs on the site would for a limited amount of time and there would
not be an increase in the number of employees on the site over the existing uses of the property.
10. NOISE
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan requires that development will not impact the residential uses
or other land uses which would be considered sensitive to noise and vibrations within the vicinity of
the project.
Noise and vibration effects on the surrounding land uses are analyzed for both short-term
construction activities and long -term operation of the proposed project. Construction activities will
be short-term in nature (approximately 4 to 6 months in duration) and will occur only between 7 AM
to 6 PM Monday - Saturday as allowed by City regulations. In addition, vibration attributable M to
construction activities is expected to be minimal due to the type of construction equipment generally
employed for development of this nature. Therefore, there are no impacts and no mitigation Is
required.
1.1
117
11. PUBLIC SERVICES
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan will not impact the demand for municipal services. Police and
fire services to the Specific Plan area are provided by the City of El Segundo Police and Fire
Departments. Water and park services are also operated by the City of El Segundo. Sewer
demands for the proposed project will be accommodated by Los Angeles County Sanitation District
sewer lines and will be treated at the County Waste Treatment facility in the City of Carson. School
services are provided by the Wisebum Unified School District. School district fees may be required,
subject to standard District regulations. No impacts on public services are expected from the
Specific Plan.
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
The Aviation l lr �of asructure beneath Rosecans Avenue and Douglas Street includes electricity, natural gas
telephone, cable television, water, sewer and storm drain lines. Utility services would be provided
by the appropriate purveyors, including: Southern California Edison Company, The Gas Company,
Pacific Bell, Paragon Cable, and the City of El Segundo Water and Wastewater Division. Solid
waste disposal is provided to commercial and industrial users by a variety of private haulers.
Development within the Specific Plan Area would contact with a provider. Landfill capacity for the
planning term (15 years) is adequate for assumed population and commercial growth within Los
Angeles County. The Aviation Specific Plan would not exceed any assumptions for either population
or commercial growth in the region. The impacts of the Specific Plan on utility systems is minimal.
Development in the Specific Plan area would submit all registration fors required for service
connections, and would adhere to all applicable utility permit guidelines and restrictions.
Water utility service is provided by the City of El Segundo Water Department which purchases water
from the West Basin Municipal Water District ( WBMWD). WBMWD recently completed the largest
water reclamation facility in the State located in El Segundo. If feasible, the project will incorporate
reclaimed water for landscape irrigation.
Therefore, the Aviation Specific Plan is not expected to generate the need for new utilities, nor
would it cause significant alterations to existing utilities.
13. AESTHETICS
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan development standards assure conformity with aesthetic
standards in effect throughout the entire City. This will minimize any visual impact on neighboring
properties. Thus, there are no significant adverse impacts.
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan will not generate negative impacts on the City's cultural
resources. The Specific Plan area currently is minimally developed, thus no historic buildings exist
on -site. Similarly, there are no known prehistoric sites or objects associated with the property or
located within the immediate vicinity. The surrounding area is a fully urbanized and developed
environment. No cultural, religious, or sacred uses or activities of importance to any particular
segment of the general population are known to be associated with the Plan area or locale.
E
1.18
The potential for significant impacts to historic or prehistoric sites, cultural, paleontologica
archeological
l,
archeological, historical or religious buildings or objects is considered remote. Further arc
studies are not necessary, and preservation efforts are not required as rt part h project
implementation. The proposed Aviation Specific Plan would not be expected to produce significant
impacts upon, or result in the alteration or destruction of any historic or prehistoric site, building,
structure, or object, nor would it result in physical changes which would affect ethnic cultural values
or restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the vicinity. Should any previously unrecorded
cultural resources be encountered during the construction of the project, all work will be stopped and
a qualified archeologist will be consulted to determine the potential significance of the find. No
mitigation is required.
15. RECREATION
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan will not generate any negative impact on recreational facilitie
ty corridor
s
and opportunities. The existing Open Space land use designation serves as Edison's utili
and as an abandoned wholesale nursery and is not accessible to nearby residents or businesses.
The Open Space land use designation is not intended to provide for recreational activity. The fact
that the area abuts the MTA Green Line and is under the Edison power lines, makes the area
difficult as a recreational destination in the City. The site is not directly related to the view,
recreation and quality of life for residents and employees within a one -mile radius and would not
diminish any recreational opportunities available to them should the Aviation Specific Plan be
approved. Demands on parks and recreational facilities are primarily generated by permanent
residential populations. No residential development is existing or proposed in the Specific Plan area
and the proposed land uses would attract a patron or employee population that is not expected to
create a significant impact upon recreational facilities. Therefore, significant impacts upon the
quantity or quality of recreational opportunities are not expected as a result of the proposed Aviation
Specific Plan. No mitigation is required.
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan is for a partially developed site located in an urban setting.
Therefore, the Specific Plan does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment
and will not achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long -tens environmental goals. There
are no foreseeable negative cumulative impacts associated with the proposed Aviation Specific Plan
that will have an adverse affect on human beings.
SECTION 5.0 SOURCES
September 1, 1998
Aviation Specific Plan Traffic ImDart G►udv, Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. January 14
and May 6, 1998
3• Solid Waste Siting Element, County of Los Angeles Countywide, Adopted 1998
p:\projects 1426- 450\ea4271ea427.isr
10
119
Project # EA- 427 /GPA 97.4/ZC 97 -3
ENVIRONMFNTei ruenvi
BACKGROUND
Project Title: Aviation Specific Plan
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of El Segundo, 350 Main Street, El Segundo CA, 90245
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Paul Garry, Planning and Building Safety Department, (310) 322-
4670, extension 399
4. Project Location: 5.4 acre corridor of land in a generally northwest to southeast diagonal between
Aviation Boulevard and Douglas Street
5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Everest Storage, 199 S. Los Robles #44o, Pasadena CA 91101
6. General Plan Designation: Existing: Ooen oa
Proposed: Aviation Soecifi Plan
7. Zoning: Existing: open IMM /O- 1
Proposed: Aviation orfi Plan
6. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later
phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -alts features necessary for l�
implementation. Attach add/tforrai sheets if necessary)
The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to adopt a Specific Plan to allow
a 60,000 square foot mini - storage facility on property currently designated as Open Space. The most recent
use of the land was for a landscape nursery. Additionally, there are Southern California Edison transmission
lines which run along the length of the property under which the mini - storage facility would be constructed.
9• Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings)
The City of EI Segundo is located in the Los Angeles urban area and is considered part of the Airport/South
Bay subregion. The subject property is in, the southeast comer of the City. The adjacent land uses
immediately north and east of the project area are primarily office, light manufacturing and
warehouse/distribution. Across Aviation Boulevard to the east are single - family residential neighborhoods in
the City of Hawthorne. South and west of the property across Santa Fe railroad fines and the MTA Green Line
right -of -way is a business park consisting of a hotel, restaurants, offices, a sports club, and research and
development facilities.
10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required (e.g., parmits, financing approval, or
participation agreement):
None.
120
It. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, Involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Land Use and Planning
Population and Housing
Geological Problems
Water
Air Quality
Transportation/Circulation
Ill. DETERMINATION:
— Biological resources
Energy and Mineral
Resources
Hazards
Noise
Public Service
Utilities and Service
Systems
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
Recreation
Mandatory Findings of
Significance
On the basis of this Initial Study of Environmental Impact, the Planning Commission of the City of El
Segundo finds the following:
X That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a
significant effect in this case because mitigation measures, as described on an attached sheet, have been added
to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is required.
That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by
mitigation measures based on earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the impact is "potentially
significant impact" or a "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant
effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to an earlier EIR, including
revisions or miti ation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
• 1 08 October
Bret . B ard, icv, 1998
Dire or of Plan ing and Building Safety
Secretary of the Planning Commission
City of El Segundo
121
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all answers are required on attached sheets).
Potentially
Significant
d Supporting Information Sources)
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
Use Planning. Would the proposal:
lict with gener al plan designation or
g?
rb)Conflict
X
lict with applicable environmental plans or
es adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
X
he project?
ompatible with existing land use in the
y?
X
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
X
incompatible land uses)?
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (include a low- income or
X
minority community)?
2. Population and Housing. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
Population projections?
X
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
X
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing?
X
Geologic
3. Geologic Problems. Would the proposal result
or expose people to potential impacts
involving:
a) Fault rupture?
b) Seismic ground shaking?
X
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
X
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
X
e) Landslides or mudflows?
X
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
X
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
X
g) Subsidence of the land?
h) Expansive soils?
X
1) Unique geologic or physical features?
X
X
3
122
ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources)
4. Water. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements?
f) Change in the quality of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifier by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capacity?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
h) Impacts to groundwater quality?
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies?
5. Air Quality. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature,
or cause any changes in climate?
d) Create objectionable odors?
6. Transportation/Circulation. Would the
Proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site?
F11
Potentially
:91b!gation nfficent
Potentially Uless
Significant
Impact Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact I Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
123
ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources)
e)
L f)
g)
7.
a)
b)
C)
d)
e)
8
a)
b)
C)
9.
a)
b)
C)
d)
e)
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or
bicyclists?
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts?
Biological Resources. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to, plants,
fish, insects, animals, and birds)?
Locally designated species (e.g., heritage
trees)?
Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and
vernal pool)?
Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
Energy and Mineral Resources. Would the
proposal:
Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans?
Use non - renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner?
Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State?
Hazards. Would the proposal involve:
A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)?
Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard?
Exposure of people to existing sources of
Potential health hazards?
Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees?
5
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
X
X .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
124
ISSUES and Supporting Potentially
pportin Information Sources) Significant
Impact
10. Noise. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
11. Public Services. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered government services in any of the
following areas:
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
c) Schools?
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
e) Other governmental services?
12. Utilities and Service Systems. Would the
Proposal result in a need for new systems or
supplies, or substantial alterations to the
following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas?
b) Communications systems?
C) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
e) Storm water drainage?
f) Solid waste disposal?
9) Local or regional water supplies?
13. Aesthetics. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
c) Create light or glare?
14. Cultural Resources. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources?
b) Disturb archaeological resources?
c) Affect historical resources?
0
Potentially
Significant
Union
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant No
Impact I Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
125
I
Potentially
ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources)
nti Signfficant
Signfficani Unless Leas Than
d) Have
Mitigation Significant No
I
Impact ncorporated Impact Impact
the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural
X
values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the Potential impact area?
X
15. Recreation. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
X
a) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
X
16. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment,
substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
X
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples
of the major periods of California history or
Prehistory-7
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long -term,
X
environmental goals?
c) Does the project have impacts that
are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable"
X
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in conjunction '
with the effects of past
projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.)
d) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial
adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
X
17• EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used
Process, one or more effects have
where, ursuant to the tiering,
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or neative declaration. Section QA
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following
a) Earlier analyses used. None.
on attached sheets:
_
Impacts adequately addressed. None.
c) Mitigation measures. None.
7
P:\ Projects\426- 4501ea4271ea427- wp.isc
126
eitu 01 eC spnJo
,. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
AND BUILDING SAFETY
INITIAL STUDY/
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT No. EA -470 DA 99 -1
BACKGROUND
Project Title:
2. Lead Agency Name and Address:
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
(310) 322 -4670
FAX (310) 322 -4167
www.elsegundo.org
3• Contact Person and Phone Number: Paul Garry Assistant Planner 322-4670 x399
4• Project Location: 5.4 arra rn.ria ...a i__, :_
5• Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Ci of EI Seaundn 350 Main Street EI Segundo
CA 90245
6. General Plan Designation: _ ODen SDacP
7. Zoning: O en S ace OS
8• Description of Project: (Describe the wh
phases of the Project, Ole action involved, including but not limited to later
mplementat'onAttach additional sheets f necpsaM or off site features necessary for its
The proposed project is an eight year Development Agreement between the City of El Segundo
and Southern California Edison for a proposed Specific Plan (Aviation Specific Plan) located on
a roughly rectangular 5.4 acre narrow corridor of land oriented in a generally northwest to
southeast diagonal between Aviation Boulevard and Douglas Street.
The Aviation Specific Plan area encourages primarily Warehouse and Storage uses in the entire
planning area, specifically with a one story, 267 unit mini - storage facility (46,830 square feet)
proposed, with limited ancillary and support uses. The proposed mini- storage facility would be
operated by Everest Storage. The study area shall be redesignated from the current Open
Space (OS) to Aviation Specific Plan (ASP) in the General Plan and Zoning Code.
The elevated MTA Green Line and the at -grade Santa Fe Railroad track border the Specific
Plan area on the southwest. Historically, the Specific Plan area has served as a right -of -way for
Southern California Edison transmission lines and towers and is designated Open Space in the
General Plan and Zoning Code. The property had also been used for a commercial landscape
127
nursery until 1997 The Specific Plan area will continue to be used as a right -of -way for Southern
California Edison lines and towers, but is not proposed to be continued as a nursery.
The proposed Development Agreement also includes an offer by Edison to dedicate a portion of
the Specific Plan property to the City for the purposes of developing a Roadway extension ( via
a underpass of the Rail Road right -of -way) to Douglas Street which would bisect the proposed
Aviation Specific Plan. Prior to construction of the proposed roadway improvements, a separate
environmental evaluation of the potential impacts of that construction will be prepared by the
City. The proposed Development Agreement merely would establish the framework for the City
to acquire the land necessary to construct the road in the future. The proposed Development
Agreement also includes the offer by Edison to lease to the City three separate parcels of land
located along Edison's transmission corridor in El Segundo between Holly and Walnut Avenues
for park purposes.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the projects surroundings)
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan project for which the Development Agreement is sought is
located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo, with convenient access to the
San Diego (1 -405) Freeway and Glenn Anderson (1 -105) Freeway. The Douglas Street Metro
Green Line Station abuts the site. This portion of the City is designated as an industrial and
commercial region which contains the Raytheon Campus, the Allied Signal complex, the
municipal golf course, the US Air Force Base, and Continental Park, a mixed use complex of
hotel, office, retail, theater and restaurant uses.
The area is currently developed with several abandoned greenhouse structures. The area is
unpaved, contains no geologic features, and is a rectangular shape. The area is currently zoned
as Open Space (OS).
The adjacent land uses immediately northeast of the Specific Plan area are primarily office,
research & development, light manufacturing and warehouse /distribution, including the Xerox neighborhoods in the
Corporation. Across Aviation Boulevard, there are single family res
City of Hawthorne; south of Rosecrans in the City of Manhattan Beach are industrial and
commercial uses, including the new Raleigh Manhattan Beach Studios. Southwesterly of the
Santa Fe Railroad tracks is Continental Park, a mixed use complex that includes a hotel, a
sports club, restaurants, theaters, research and development, retail, and office buildings.
There are no known endangered plant species associated with the proposed Specific Plan area
and none that are known to be associated with the immediate locale. Similarly, there are no
known rare or endangered animal species associated with the area or its locale. No known
animal life is located in the area. Further, there are no known cultural, historic, or scenic
resources of recognized value located within the Specific Plan area nor in the immediate
vicinity.
The three properties owned by Edison, which would be leased to the City for park purposes,
include 1) 0.61 acres located on Washington Street between Walnut Avenue and sycamore
Avenue; 2) 2.05 acres located on Illinois Street between Mariposa Avenue and Pine Avenue;
and, 3) 1 acre located on Illinois Street between Holly Avenue and Pine Avenue. These
properties are currently undeveloped. There are single - family residential (R -1) uses to the west
of these properties and primarily Multi- family (R -3) properties to the east of these properties.
There are no known endangered plant species associated with the three Edison properties and
none that are known to be associated with the immediate locale. Similarly, there are properties
known
rare or endangered animal species associated with this area or its locale. , t known animal fife
is located in the area. Further, there are no known cultural, historic, or scenic resources of
recognized value located on these three Edison parcels nor in the immediate vicinity. These
2
128
three properties are designated Open Space in the El Segundo General Plan and zoned Open
Space (OS) in the Zoning Code.
9• Other Public Agencies Whose A
approval, or participation agreement.): Pproval is Required (e.g., permits, financing
None
129
II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below (X) would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following
pages.
Aesthetics
Agricultural Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology /Soils
III. DETERMINATION:
L
Hydrology/Water Quality
Land Use/Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population /Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation/Traffic
Utilities /Service Systems
On the basis of this Initial Study of Environmental Impact, the Planning Commission of the City of El
Segundo finds the following:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed
to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potential significant impact' or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately
analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed
by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to
be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because
all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Rret B. Bernard, AICP,
•ector of Planning and Building Safety; and,
.,ecretary of the Planning Commission
City of El Segundo
Ata t 25 1999
Date
X
130
IV. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the
information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects
like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be
explained where it is based on project - specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not
expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project - specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as
well as project - level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers
must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than
significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be
significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an
EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact."
The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less
than significant level (mitigation measures from Section 17, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross - referenced).
5) Earlier where, tiering, ((�en has
been analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)dthis case, a
brief discussion should identify the following;
(a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
(b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of
and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
(c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the
extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential
impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should,
where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals
contacted should be cited in the discussion.
6) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should
whatever format is selected.
normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in
g) The analysis of each issue should identify: (a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each
question; and (b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
131
Issues and Supporting Information
ten l t Ica than Ic Than No Impac s Bn can
Significant Significam
Impact With Impact
Mi[igmion
In ted
I. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to X
trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic
highway?
X
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site
and its surroundings? X
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the area?
X
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan development standards and Open Space Zoning for proposed park facilities assures
conformity with aesthetic standards in effect throughout the entire City. This will minimize any visual impact on
neighboring properties. Thus, there are no significant adverse impacts.
I!A
a)
AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland. Would the project?
Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to
the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency to non - agricultural use?
Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
C) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their
location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-
agricultural use?
El
K,
3
The proposed Development Agreement only affects property zoned Open Space (OS), which does not contain any
farmland. Therefore, it will not affect any farmland. There is no Williamson Act contracted land in the City of El Segundo.
3. AIR gUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality
plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing X
or projected air quality violation.
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria X
Pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an
emissions r ambient
(including which ex exceed quantitative thresholds for
X precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
e) Create ob'ectionable odors affectin a substantial number of X
9 people.
1
X
132
Issues and Supporting
Si dicant
!sn Significant significant
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
The land uses permitted in the Specific Plan area (warehouse and storage) would not be ex
significant changes in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the vicinity. The S petted to produce any
area of 70,567 square feet, based on a maximum floor area ratio of .3:7. As pa (result of the proposed project, which
would be approximately 46,830 square feet, air emissions would fall below the South Coast Air Quality Management
District's (SCAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook thresholds (Table 6 -3) for significant air quality impacts. Therefore,
there will be no impact and no mitigation will be required for the construction and operation of the facilities.
The development of the Edison properties into City parks would create minor air quality construction impacts due to
grading activities. As no significant structures would be constructed.
no significant operational impacts would be
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations,
or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and X
Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantially adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies,
regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S.
Wildlife Service? X
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as
defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited
to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means? X
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with established native resident migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, X
Natural Conservation Community Plan, other approved local, regional,
or state habitat conservation plan? X
There are no known rare, unique or endangered plant or animal species associated with the proposed Development
Agreement components or within the immediate vicinity. Development of the Aviation Specific Plan area and leased
parkland would include additional landscaping consisting of plant species which readily adapt to urban environments and
drought tolerant plant species as required by City regulations. Therefore, the proposed Development Agreement
components would not produce significant changes to the number of rare or endangered plant species in the area
(including trees, shrubs grass, crops, and micro flora).
The Specific Plan and leased Edison park areas and immediate locale are not known to contain any rare or endangered
animal species. Since the areas are located within a highly developed urban area, the potential for animal life on -sites is
very limited and may only include species that have adapted to such environments. Development in the Development
Agreement component projects areas would represent a continuation of a regional urbanizing trend which has
permanently altered wildlife habitat in the area. Given the very limited animal life on the sites, the proposed project would
not produce significant impacts to the number of rare or endangered species result in significant changes in the diversity of species, reduction in numbers, or deterioration of valuable animal habitats.
There are no known natural communities of wildlife, wetlands, or migration reas specimens he project area. roject area, nor would
133
Issues and Supporting Information
significant significant Significant
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
S. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical
resource as defined in Section 15064.5? X
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resources pursuant to Section 15064.5?
X
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature?
X
U) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
X
The proposed Development Agreement component projects would not generate negative impacts on the City's cultural
resources. The Specific Plan area currently is minimally developed, thus no historic buildings exist on -site. The three
park facilities to be leased by the City are vacant, except for transmission towers. Similarly, there are no known prehistoric
sites or objects associated with the properties or located within the immediate vicinity. The surrounding areas are in a fully
urbanized and developed environment. No cultural, religious, or sacred uses or activities of importance to any particular
segment of the general population are known to be associated with the area or locale.
The potential for significant impacts to historic or prehistoric sites, cultural, paleontological, archeological, historical or
religious buildings or objects is considered remote. Further archeological studies are not necessary, and preservation
efforts are not required as a part of project implementation. The proposed Development Agreement component projects
would not be expected to produce significant impacts upon, or result in the alteration or destruction of any historic or
prehistoric site, building, structure, or object, nor would it result in physical changes which would affect ethnic cultural
values or restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the vicinity. Should any previously unrecorded cultural resources
encountered during the construction of the projects, all work will be stopped and a qualified archeologist will be consulted
,o determine the potential significance of the find. No mitigation is required.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, it
(i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence
of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
(ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
(iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction?
(iv) Landslides?
Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of tonsoil7
C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on,
or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or
collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -a -B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems w here sewers are not
available for the disposal of waste water?
the risk of loss, injury or death involving:
0
0
0
0
0
134
Issues and Supporting Information 1 otenuall
Y Less than lest Thin
Significant Significant Significant
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan consists of 5.4 acres of partially developed land. The Edison parcels to be leased by
I City consist of 3.66 acres of undeveloped land. These areas are essentially level, thus the potential for landslides and
mudslides is non - existent. New development within these areas would require minimal grading and minimal changes in
topography. Exposure of soils to additional erosion factors would also not be expected.
The issuance of a grading permit is a standard requirement in the City and will ensure slope stability and erosion control
during construction. There are no unique geological or physical features within the Specific Plan area or on the other
Edison parcels that would be impacted. The Development Agreement components will not increase or change alluvial
deposits or erosion, either off- or on -site and will not modify any body of water as a result of erosion or deposits.
Compliance with local storm water and urban runoff regulations will also be required.
The Development Agreement project components are located within the seismically active Southern California region;
therefore, as with any new development, site occupants would be subject to similar seismic risks as other developments
of a comparable size and use which are located in the vicinity of the Specific Plan. However, no known geologic features
exist on the Sites, and no known active or potential active faults are located on or near the proposed project areas. The
risk of surface rupture due to faulting is considered remote, as is the potential for ground failure or other seismic hazards.
In addition, new development within the Development Agreement component areas would comply with all
building standards, regulations and permit requirements as contained in the Uniform Building Code (UBCpl and the City
Segundo Municipal Code. Development within the project areas would have a less than significant impact on topography
and soils, and would not expose people or property to significant geologic hazards. No mitigation is required for the
Development Agreement.
7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project?
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the
routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials?
X
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the
likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? X
C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an exiting or
proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials
sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as
a result would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
X
X
According to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste and Substance Sites List,
dated April, 1998, there are no sites in the OS Zone which is listed as having potentially leaking underground storage
tanks. There are no other known potentially hazardous sites which would affect Development Agreement component
projects.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a
plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project result in 0a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area? X
T) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the or
area? X
g) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
X
1.1.5
Issues and Supporting Information
n)
c:xpuse people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
significant Significant Significant
Impact With Impact
Mitigation
KI
The viation Spe Plan anticipates that development would utilize common cleaning solutions, disposed of it
accordanceA with cific
applicable statutes. Although the use of these materials would be considered an increase over existing
circumstances since the site currently has minimal development, the amount to be used represents a marginal increase
and is considered insignificant when compared to the total use of hazardous materials in the City and airport area as a
whole. Based on the amount of hazardous materials stored, the nature of the packaging, the materials involved, and the
Specific Plan's compliance with applicable regulations, the risk from development in the plan area is considered minor.
Based on the foregoing, the proposed Specific Plan will have a less than significant impact regarding the use, disposal, or
release of potentially hazardous materials and no mitigation is required.
Currently, the Specific Plan area is accessible to emergency vehicles via Aviation Boulevard and Douglas Street. Based
on traffic volumes detailed in the original Specific Plan Traffic Impact Study, no unmitigated traffic impacts are foreseen
with development in the Specific Plan area. Evacuation plans and procedures would be incorporated into building and
site design. The development of the Douglas Street roadway extension would eliminate the current access to the property
from Douglas Street. However, an emergency access road from Douglas Street or a turn around area on -site would be
provided to facilitate emergency access to the property. Therefore, the Aviation Specific Plan is not expected to interfere
with emergency response or evacuation plans and no mitigation is required.
The Development Agreement component projects are located beneath high voltage electricity transmission lines operated
by Southern California Edison. Scientific studies conducted in the United States and abroad have identified that exposure
to electromagnetic fields (EMF's) associated with power lines could be potentially hazardous to human health. However,
there appears to be no conclusive body of evidence to support a conclusion that the proposed land uses in the
=velopment Agreement would subject humans to EMF's that would be harmful. Additionally, the number of people
,.:ustomers) that potentially could be exposed to EMF's on the sites would for a limited amount of time and there would
not be an increase in the number of employees on the site over the existing uses of the property.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?
D) Substantially degrade groundwater supplies or interfere substantially X
with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in
aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g.,
the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which X
permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a
manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -
site? X
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off site? X
e) Create or contribute runoff which would exceed the capacity of existing
or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff? X
Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
X
10
136
Issues and Supporting Information p„t;aly than
Significant Significant
Impact With
Mitigation
g) Place housing within a 100 -year floodplain, as mapped on a federal
Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood
hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would
impede or redirect flood flows?
1) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee
or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
Less Than I No
Significant
Impact
X
M
9
X
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan consists of 5.4 acres of unimproved land and is essentially level. The three Edison
properties are also unimproved and level. There is no paving or asphalt on the properties to impede percolation of on -site
water into the groundwater table. On -site surface water run -off is influenced by the existing topography of the project
sites. No water conveyance structures (e.g., culverts) which are designed to convey on -site surface water flows to off -site
facilities, are currently located on the sites. Surface flows which are not absorbed on -site within the properties drain off -
site into adjacent surface streets and eventually to storm drains which drain into the Pacific Ocean.
The Development Agreement components project are located within an urbanized environment, and are not near any
surface water bodies or within a flood plain designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency or in any areas
subject to flooding.
Development of the Specific Plan area would introduce urban contaminants (i.e. tire wear residue, oil and grease,
fertilizers, etc.) to the site which are not currently present. However, these are not expected to be in sufficient quantities to
degrade opatterns te surface water run -off or groundwater quality. Existing absorption rates and drainage patterns would
nge
cha , as proposed improvements (i.e. building, surface parking lot, and driveways, etc.) would increase the amount of
impervious su'aces presently located on -site. Proposed landscaped areas would permit some surface water absorption.
Given the increase in imperviousness, drainage volumes would increase, and surface water run -off generated by new
development in the Specific Plan area would continue to be collected by storm drains located along Douglas Street and
Rosecrans Avenue and directed via culverts to the Pacific Ocean. The development of the Edison properties into park
facilities would no be expected to significantly alter drainage patterns because the properties would likely be developed
primarily with grass and landscaping.
The Aviation Specific Plan requires that site run -off and absorption rates will be calculated and analyzed by a licensed
civil engineer who will develop a design to facilitate drainage via the existing storm sewer system adjacent to the site.
Any improvements will be required to be completed by development applicants. An engineered drainage system of area
inlets and catch basins should accommodate anticipated runoff requirements within the existing storm sewer system. The
Specific Plan also regulates that new development will be required to comply with the City's Storm Water and Urban
Runoff Pollution Prevention Control Ordinance (No. 1235) and the Water Conserving Landscape Ordinance (No. 1194)
and Resolution (No. 3806). A National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board may be required because the site is more than 5 acres in size.
During construction the displacement of earth could temporarily cause a change in drainage patterns. New Patterns will
be established once the project is completed. All runoff during and after construction will be required to drain into storm
drainage facilities in accordance with plans and permits approved by the Departments of Planning and Building Safety
and Public Works. Adjacent properties will be protected from flooding and erosion in accordance with standard code
requirements.
Significant impacts to water availability are not anticipated from the Development Agreement components. While the
proposed development would represent a continuation of the region's urbanizing trend, it would not result in significant
impacts to ocean or groundwater quality, absorption rates, drainage patterns, surface water run -off, or the amount of
available water. There are no new impacts anticipated or associated with the proposed project and no mitigation beyond
the standard permits is required.
11
137
Information Potentially I Leis than Less Than
Significant Signiftrant Significant
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
a. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
X
b) Conflict with an,applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an
agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the
general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental X
effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural
communities conservation plan? X
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan, as the project under consideration in the proposed Development Agreement, will
Provide the land use policies and development standards for the Plan area, replacing the current Open Space (O -S)
Zoning. The Specific Plan is based on a ten -year outlook for development and growth. The Specific Plan envisions a
warehouse and storage use with low density. Where the Specific Plan does not provide standards or guidelines, the
zoning for the Light Industrial (M -1) Zone shall apply.
The Aviation Specific Plan proposes a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 0.3:1. The current Open Space designation does not
contain a maximum Floor Area Ratio, since the Open Space Land Use Designation does not anticipate that enclosed
structures would built.
The Specific Plan area would eliminate a passive use open space area in a portion of the City with limited open space.
However, due to the configuration and location of the property, it does not provide a useable amenity for the community.
The property has limited street frontage on Douglas Street and Aviation Boulevard. It is currently fenced and inaccessible
'he public. Landscaping along the Aviation Boulevard frontage effectively hides the rest of the property from view from
street. Conversion of the property to_a mini- storage use would not significantly reduce a usable open space area. The
proposed use is also compatible with the scale and use of the surrounding light industrial (M -1) and Urban Mixed -Use
(MU -S) Zones. The Development Agreement, through the lease of 3.66 acres of Edison land to the City, would provide
the opportunity for the City to develop additional parks and recreational facilities in the residential area of the City. The
three Edison parcels to be leased by the City currently serve as passive use open space.
Conformance with the General Plan is a policy issue which is determined at the discretion of the Planning Commission and
the City Council. The Zoning and Municipal Codes incorporate many requirements which will help to mitigate any potential
General Plan conflicts such as landscaping, underground utilities, Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies,
water conservation and storm water control.
As previously discussed, the land uses surrounding the Specific Plan area consist of office, light industrial, research and
development uses, a health club, restaurants and a hotel. The project is not expected to produce significant impacts in
the pattern or scale of existing development within the Specific Plan area or in its vicinity. Additionally, there are no
agricultural land uses or established low- income or minority communities in the vicinity that could be impacted.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would
be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
X
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other
land use plan? X
12
1.3R
Issues and Supporting Information
w,cnuauY less than
Significant Significant
Impact With
Mitigation
significant
Impact
No
The proposed Development Agreement component projects would not impact the community with respect to the
consumption of renewable and non - renewable natural resources in the form of building materials during construction, and
water and fossil fuels during project operation. The Specific Plan area and Edison property to be leased to the City
currently have limited development, thus increased development on the sites would result in a increase in the
consumption of natural resources including fossil fuels in the form of electricity and natural gas: however, consumption is
expected to be marginal and would be considered insignificant relative to cumulative consumption volumes throughout
the City of El Segundo and the airport area as a whole. Development in the Specific Plan area would be expected to
consume natural resources at relatively low rates, and impacts to energy and mineral resources would therefore be
considered insignificant. It is anticipated that existing supplies and infrastructure are adequate to meet the potential
additional demands for water and wastewater facilities. In addition, the Specific Plan would comply with all applicable
statutes and regulations set forth In the Uniform Building Code, and all applicable State resource conservation measures.
Southern California Edison Company and the Gas Company are the suppliers of electricity and natural gas to the Specific
Plan area. Existing fuel supplies and infrastructure should be adequate to meet the development needs. The proposed
Specific Plan would comply with all applicable statues and regulations sat forth by the respective energy companies, in
addition to all applicable State energy conservation measures. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan is not expected to
result in significant increases in fossil fuel consumption or to produce any significant impacts upon the use, extraction or
conservation of any natural resources, and no mitigation is required.
The development and operation of the three Edison parcels for City park purposes would be expected to consume
negligible amounts of renewable and non - renewable natural resources. The facilities would be expected to use water to
irrigate the parks. Since the physical development of the properties has not been designed, it is not known the amount of
water which would be used.
11. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantially temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in
the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or, where such a
plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project
expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive
noise levels?
13
11
13 9
Issues and Supporting Information
..' Inan No Im
Significant Significant Significant pact
Impact With Impact
Mitigation
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan requires that development will not impact the residential uses or other land uses
which would be considered sensitive to noise and vibrations within the vicinity of the project.
Noise and vibration effects on the surrounding land uses are analyzed for both short-term construction activities and long-
term operation of the proposed project. Construction activities in the Specific Plan area will be short-term in nature
(approximately 4 to 6 months in duration) and will occur only between 7 AM to 6 PM Monday - Saturday as allowed by
City regulations. In addition, vibration attributable to construction activities is expected to be minimal due to the type of
construction equipment generally employed for development of this nature. Therefore, there are no impacts and no
mitigation is required.
Construction and operation of the three park properties to be leased from Edison should create minimal noise impacts on
the surrounding residential areas to the minimal construction activities involved with transforming vacant land to parkland.
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction
of replacement housing elsewhere?
X
1997, the City of El Segundo had a permanent population of approximately 16,250 and a daytime population of
proximately 75,000. This resident to employee ratio has contributed to a relatively high demand for housing within the
Gity. In 1996, a total of approximately 71325 dwelling units existed in El Segundo. All residences in the City are located
west of Sepulveda Boulevard, while non - residential uses are located predominantly to the east of Sepulveda Boulevard.
The Specific Plan area is located east of Sepulveda Boulevard and is surrounded by commercial and industrial uses. The
proposed Specific Plan would not alter the expected distribution of population. Additionally, the proposed Specific Plan
does not propose the development or demolition of residential land uses, and would not directly generate permanent
Population growth in the City.
New development within the Specific Plan area will bring minimal new employment to the area, and will not measurably
add to the daytime population. No significant impact is foreseen in the proposed Specific Plan.
13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision
of new or physically altered government facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
X
C) Schools?
X
d) Parks?
X
e) Other public facilities?
X
X
14
14o
and Supporting
c than No
Significant Significant tec
Significant
Impact With Impact
Mitigation
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan will not impact the demand for municipal services. Police and fire services to the
Specific Plan area are provided by the City of El Segundo Police and Fire Departments. Water and park services are alsc
operated by the City of El Segundo. Sewer demands for the proposed project will be accommodated by Los Angeles
County Sanitation District sewer lines and will be treated at the County Waste Treatment facility in the City of Carson.
School services are provided by the Wisebum Unified School District. School district fees may be required, subject to
standard District regulations. No impacts on public services are expected from the Specific Plan.
The development of three properties for park facilities would increase the demand for public services for the ongoing
maintenance of the parks. The City has determined that it has the resources to provide necessary maintenance for the
parks without compromising service at other existing park facilities.
The development of the Douglas Street roadway extension would also create ongoing maintenance responsibilities for the
City. The City Public Works Department has determined that the incremental increase in maintaining an extra one -eight
of a mile of roadway would be negligible. Therefore, there would be no significant public service impacts from the
Development Agreement component projects.
14. RECREATION.
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment? X
The proposed Aviation Specific Plan will not generate any negative impact on recreational facilities and opportunities.
The existing Open Space land use designation serves as Edison's utility corridor and as an abandoned wholesale nursery
and is not accessible to nearby residents or businesses. The Open Space land use designation is not intended to provide
for recreational activity. The fact that the area abuts the MTA Green Line and is under the Edison power lines, makes the
area difficult as a recreational destination in the City. The site is not directly related to the view, recreation and quality of
life for residents and employees within a one -mile radius and would not diminish any recreational opportunities available
to them should the Aviation Specific Plan be approved. Demands on parks and recreational facilities are primarily
generated by permanent residential populations. No residential development is existing or proposed in the Specific Plan
area and the proposed land uses would attract a patron or employee population that is not expected to create a significant
impact upon recreational facilities. Therefore, significant impacts upon the quantity or quality of recreational opportunities
are not expected as a result of the proposed Aviation Specific Plan. No mitigation is required.
The three properties totaling 3.66 acres to be leased to the City for parkland would improve the recreational opportunities
for residents and visitors in the City. These properties are zoned Open Space (OS) which allows parks as a permitted
use. i
15. TRANSPORTATIONirTRAFFIC. Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in the traffic which is substantial in relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a
substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? X
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard
established by the county congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways? X
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in
traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety
risks? X
15
141
Issues
.,) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm eauiomently
Result in
access?
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies or programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racksl7
16
uWjr tscc man L<.a Phan No Im
Significant Significant Significant
Impact With Impact
Mitigation
InCO orated
::]:::i:::Fx
X
142
Issues and Supporting Information Potentially Le %than Lest Than No Impact
Significant Significant Significant
Impact With Impact
Mitigation
Inco mtW
A Traffic Report was prepared for the proposed Aviation Specific Plan. The Traffic Study estimated that the traffic
generation for the proposed use based upon a 60,000 square foot buildout.. Since the Traffic Study was prepared the size
of the proposed project has been reduced to 46,830 square feet. The trip generation for the larger project (worst case
scenario) would be a total of 146 trips per day based on Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) rates. Eight trips are projected
for the morning peak hour and 3 trips in the evening peak hour. The previous nursery use in the Specific Plan area, by
comparison, if it operated as a retail nursery would have been expected to generate approximately 647 trips on a daily
basis (based on ITE rates) with 17 trips in the morning peak hour and 50 trips in the evening peak hour. Since the
previous nursery did operate more as a wholesale nursery and growing grounds, the actual trip generation would likely
have been much lower. Comparing the trip generation for the nursery and the proposed Aviation Specific Plan indicates
that the Specific Plan would generate 501 fewer trips on a daily basis, nine fewer trips in the morning peak hour and 47
fewer trips in the evening peak hour. Based on a full build out of the Spec fic Plan area (70,567 square feet), as a mini -
storage facility (worse case scenario) approximately 169 daily trips would be generated, with 8 trips in the morning peak
hour and 3 trips in the evening peak hour.
The capacity of the intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and Aviation Boulevard was also analyzed in the Traffic Study. This
intersection currently operates at a "I" Level of Service (LOS) in the morning and evening peak hours. The proposed
project would not increase the Intersection Capacity Utilization above the current 1.17 level on the morning peak hour and
1.67 in the evening peak hour. Therefore the traffic generation from the proposed Specific Plan will not have a significant
impact and no mitigation is necessary.
Several roadway improvements which have been implemented since 1990 have contributed to the generally decreased
congestion at the Rosecrans Avenue /Aviation Boulevard intersection. The 1 -105 freeway and Metro Green Line have
been completed, and Douglas and Nash Streets, north of El Segundo Boulevard have been converted to a one -way
couplet. These improvements, have improved traffic flows around the Aviation Specific Plan area. Other planned roadway
improvements in the area (Aviation Boulevard widening) are expected to reduce the morning peak hour LOS to level D
(0.83 ICU) and a lower 1.05 ICU in the evening peak hour (still LOS F).
The City is planning to construct a roadway connecting the two ends of Douglas Street. This would involve constructing a
underpass beneath the Santa Fe railroad tracks and the MTA Green Line right -of -way. The Public Utilities Commission
has denied the City's request for an at -grade crossing of the railroad tracks several times. The future construction of the
underpass will pass through the Specific Plan area, resulting in a reduction of useable land in the Plan area. The
proposed Everest Storage facility would be constructed on the southeast side of the proposed roadway. Primary access
to the Plan area would be taken from Aviation Boulevard. An Emergency access road and service road for the use by the
railroad and Edison may also be constructed from the Douglas Street end of the Plan area. Alternatively a bridge, running
Darallel to the railroad right -of -way may also be constructed to facilitate "downline access" for Edison service trucks.
Based the above indicated factors, as well as other planned roadway improvements, the proposed Aviation Specific Plan
mill not cause a significant traffic impact in the surrounding environmental setting and circulation.
fhe proposed Development Agreement components will not produce significant impacts for vehicular, bicycle, rail, or
ledestrian safety and will not create any significant congestion impacts in the surrounding area. The Specific Plan area will
lrovide all parking as required by the El Segundo Zoning Code.
lased on ITE rates for a local park (ITE Category 411), the 3.66 acres of Edison land to be leased by the City would generate
pproximately 8 trips per week day and approximately 22 trips per weekend day when developed as park facilities. This is
ased on the current undefined plan for the actual physical development of the park facilities. Therefore the traffic generation
om the use of the leased Edison properties for park purposes will not have a significant impact and no mitigation is
ecessary.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project.
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional
Water Quality Control Board? X
b) Require or result in construction of new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or ex ansion of existin facilities, the construction of which X
17
143
Issues and Supporting Information Potentially Less Ilan Lest Than No Impact
Significant Significant Significant
Impact With Impact
Mitigation
In rated
could cause significant environmental effects?
re or result in the construction of new storm water drainage
es or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which
Ecould cause significant environmental effect s?
X
sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from
g entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded
ments needed?
X
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which
services or may serve the project determined that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the
X
provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
X
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statues and regulations related to
solid waste?
X
The Aviation Specific Plan area would necessitate new utility connections. Existing utility infrastructure beneath
Rosecrans Avenue and Douglas Street includes electricity, natural telephone,
gas, cable television, water, sewer and
storm drain lines. Utility services would be provided by the appropriate purveyors, including: Southern California Edison
Company, The Gas Company, Pacific
Bell, Paragon Cable, and the City of El Segundo Water and Wastewater Division.
Solid waste disposal is provided to commercial and industrial users by a variety
of private haulers. Development within
the Specific Plan Area would contract with a provider. Landfill capacity for the planning term (15
Issumed is
years) adequate for
population and commercial growth within Los Angeles County. The Aviation Specific Plan would not exceed any
sumptions for either population or commercial growth in the
region. The impacts of the Specific Plan on utility systems
o minimal. Development in the Specific Plan area would submit all registration forms required for
service connections,
and would adhere to all applicable utility permit guidelines and restrictions.
Water utility service is provided by the City of El Segundo Water Department which purchases water from the West Basin
Municipal Water District ( WBMWD). WBMWD
recently completed the largest water reclamation facility in the State
located in El Segundo. If feasible, the project will incorporate reclaimed
water for landscape irrigation.
Therefore, the Aviation Specific Plan is not expected to generate the need for new utilities, nor would it cause significant
alterations to existing utilities.
The proposed park facilities would require minimal new utility facilities. Since the physical design of the parks has not
Deen developed, it is not known the full extent of the
utilities which would be required to serve the future facilities.
-lowever, the future facilities would most likely involve relatively passive uses in order to
minimize any impacts on the
adjacent residential uses. Such passive uses would not significant usage electricity, gas or other utility services.
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
I) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the
X
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
1s
144
177 pporting Information Potentially th, k« rnan No Imp
Significant Significant Signircant
Impact With Impact
Mitigation
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that
the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of the past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
F7
5
Based on the analysis provided above, The proposed Development Agreement is for projects on partially developed and
undeveloped sites located in an urban setting. Therefore, the Development Agreement does not have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment and will not achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long -term
environmental goals. There are no foreseeable negative cumulative impacts associated with the proposed Development
Agreement that will have an adverse affect on human beings.
PAPlanning & Building Safety \PROJECTS\451- 4751EA470\EA470. Initial Study Checklict.doc
19
145
A r
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
AND BUILDING SAFETY
A- 2911MULM,
. 1 • Name.
Fa
3.
4.
INITIAL STUDY
APPLICANT OUESTIONNAIRE
number of current property
(Note: Property Owner's signature is required on
Assessors Block and Lot No.:
Name. address, and lelepbcne number of
(H different from Prooertr tarn . - e
(Note: Applicants Signature is required on page 7)
List and deser3e any edror related post and other p l
by city, regional, state. and federal agencies: 4
S. Existing zoning district �_►5
6. Proposed use of sits
(Project for which this form is ffirrM:
9• PROJECT pFereppTlnr� Use additional sheets as MCessarfr,
1.
2
3.
4.
S.
6.
Site size -, Gi?i n rn
Total square footage of bulding(s) or
Number of floors of corm Lrion: _
Amount Of Or"ite OaridM
Proposed scheduling.
Associated Projects and relationship to er
larg Project or series of
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
FAX (310) 322 -41670
Person to be cOrtaeted concerning the proms
oar r
°123.
required for fNs pmjeoL
irheludmg those required
7. If residential, include the number of units. schedule Of unit
type Of housed wed• range of axle pies or rants, and
B.
if commercial, in
nature of loading�cilitux pfd r neighh6odhood cr y oriented, square footage of building area, and
�r Arf� Project No. EA EA -I+a
U
/ih X�v GT . 1 &PA f7-4
Z C 9 7 -a
146
C.
8. If industrial, indicate type, estimated empbymant Per shin, and nature of boding faaidiss —
10. f institutional. indicate the major Lmom estirmled employment per shin, estimated cccupanc nature of loading
facrTrfes Provided and carrs wr*y bereft to be derived loom the pmpcL --
11. f the Project requires a variance, cmabm W use p@m* or rezoning won state this and indicate derrry why
the application is required
"'Sm'c', a PLP(�l 1 S L�E*M6 Soll6�rf
t • Describe the Project site as t erdsla before the
Prele<'t. tldtrdmg irdomufon on
animals, and any erAWral, hislorieal. or scenic r co res on n te, Wly, plants end
the structures. Attach � Oeaerlos � a4u�ttaK on ttue ate. and the use of
Photographs of the ate. Snapshots or polaroid Photos will be aceeptad.
51 T�
IS RSLAVW y FLAT "4 w ct sry Fniz opjSkN
bctsrrldlt�ts unite 'T4WEAr . T s4 SITS Gl sw To namA A
V�sP� nMlcsbf�)+, IT Is NdIN A'IbftivDa�o �n/1
2. Describe ft surrounding prgw
scenic including adorrrretpn on PI°^b and animals and any ctd4rral, ftlalorieal, or
expects. Indicate ft type of I" use reside
k
aPamnent houses. s ( m comffwrcol, etc), 61 W Oty of land use (onedam8y,
hops, dsPartnem stores, etc.). and scale of developrnent (height, frontage, setback rear yard.
etc). Attach Photographs d the Vkk ty. Snapshots or polaroid photos WE be
-99- S71�'e ).r d/V 7Fa /�bR7f7 Pled
yr1yROAV
Air
ENVIRONMENrer r�� B "�N,/if1 K 1i�i1N11 �sr� YACAf r /
responses to Items B and C above. of all answers are required on attached sheets. or refer to previous
Land Use Planning. Wooid the propoest YES MAYBE NO
—_
a) Conflict with gsrw al plan daaigrtattort or zoning?
b) Confltet with applicable a mmmnbd plane or
policies opted by agencies with jurisdiction over v 4
the pmpect?
C) i wtlble with coaling land raw in the
K
117
2
3.
a.
3
NO
V
M
�V
V
.//
V
V/
V
V
JZ
148
YES MAYBE
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
--'
incompatible land uses)?
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (inciude a low-income or
--
minority community)?
Population and Housing. Would the proposal;
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections?
'-
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
C) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing?
--
Geologic Problems. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture?
b) Seismic ground shaidng?
C) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
e) _ Landslides or mudflows?
Q Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or M?
g) Subsidence of the land?
h) Expansive soils?
—
i) Unique geologic or physical features?
Water. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in
�
absorption otmt
or the crate and of surface runno�
b) Exposure of people or or property to water related
hazards such as flooding?
C) Discharge Into surface waters or other alteration
Of surface water quality (e.g.. temperature.
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
--
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
e) Changes in currents. or the course or direction of
water movements?
Q Change in the quality of ground waters either
,
through direct additions or withdrawals. or through
interception of an equiller by dris or exeavaZamu ,
or through substantial loss
of groundwater
recharge capacttyt
g) Altered direction or rate of now of groundwater?
3
NO
V
M
�V
V
.//
V
V/
V
V
JZ
148
a 1.49
h) lmpeas to groundwater quafiiy''
YES MAYBE N,
A substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwar te r otherwise available for public water
supplies
s• Air Quality. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
exsbng or
✓
Proiaeted air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutems?
V—
C) Alter air movemem, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any changes In climate?
j
V
d) Create objectionable odors?
6. Transportation/Circulation. Would the proposal result im
`/ --
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e .g ,
sharp curves or dangerous idarsee
--- �
s
Incompatible uses (e.9- farm equipment)?
—"
C) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capadiy, ontilte or off site?
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicydists?
, ✓/
Conflicts with adopted Mild" supporting
alternative transportation (e.g„ bus turrioutig,
—�
bicycle racks)?
9) Rail, waterbome or ale traffic impacts?
T• Biological Resources. Would the proposal result ins
impacts
—/
to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to, plants, fish.
insects,
00,
-- V0
animals, and binds)?
b) . Locally designated spades (e.g., heritage trees)?
✓
C) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc,)?
—_
d) Welland habitat (e.9., marsh, riparian ar.:! vernal
poolp
V/
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
8• Energy and Mineral Resourcm Would the proposal..
---
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation pays?
b) uineffieian� resources in a wastehd and
✓ ve
C) Result in the loaf of
_ t would be of a tune v to
he �on���the residents of the SW*?alue
a 1.49
13
8. Hazards. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to, oq, Pssbades, chemicals, or radiation)?
b) POUR* interference with an emergency
response Plan or emergency evacuation plan?
C) The creation of any health hazed or potential
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
Potential health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass. or trees?
10. Noise. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
11. Public Services. Would it* proposal have an affect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas;
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
C) Schools?
d) Maintenance of p0L- faWlties, kciuding roads?
e) Other govemmenIsi services?
12 _ Utilities and Service. System Would the proposal result
in a need for new systems or supplies, or subatsmW
alterations to the following Lo eir .
e) Power or natural gas?
b) Communications systems?
C) Local Or regional water treatment or distribution
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
e) Storm water drainage?
Solid waste drtpoaal?
9) Local or regional water supplies?
Aasth&Ucs. Would the Proposal
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
b) Have a demon in" negative aesthetic affect?
C) Create fight or glare?
Cultural Resources. Would the proposal
a) Disturb paleontological resources?
b) Disturb erehaeologKal resources?
5_
YES MAYBE
NO
V
Z
L
V
_IL
A%
_V
V
V /
✓V
150
OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT
Ne)
rlication; I jwe) have familiarized myself (ourselves) with the rules and am (are) the OWNER(S) of the ProPsrtY involved in thin
i filing this application; and the information on a6 doeum the and and ct the City of d
el. Plans ts true and correct to the my ((00 knowledge and
Owner's SigrraWre
6
Dab
Dab
I
e] Affect historical resources?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Have the potential to cause a physical Change
which would afted unique ethnic Cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area?
f
15 ReCnatloa Would the proposal;
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional Parlor or a'1er recreational beilities?
a) Affect existing recreational opportunllies?
/
16. Mandatory Findings of Significance,
a) Doan the project have the potential to degrade the
✓
qua4ty of the erwironment, aubstantlally reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self.
sustaining Isvets, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal ccrmmunity, reduce the number or rsob
the range of a rare or endangered plant pr amumal
or eliminate hnportam nejor
of
periods of California history or
b) Does the Project have the potential to achieve
short -tens,
to the disadvantage of long brtn,
V
—�
environmental goals?
C) Does the Project have impacts that au re
individualty limited, but Cun "v
-- V000,
Considerable?- (8C elyoonaid*raW
means that the incremental. effects of a project
are Considerable when viewed in tlon with
the effects of Past projects, the effects of other
current Projects, and the effects of probabl inure
Projects.)
d) Does the project have environmenal effects
✓
which will cause Substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indiredlyl
-- -
OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT
Ne)
rlication; I jwe) have familiarized myself (ourselves) with the rules and am (are) the OWNER(S) of the ProPsrtY involved in thin
i filing this application; and the information on a6 doeum the and and ct the City of d
el. Plans ts true and correct to the my ((00 knowledge and
Owner's SigrraWre
6
Dab
Dab
I
OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION
that this authorized to act for me h aA meCaa relevant to this
person will be the pnmary contact on the project and will bs sent ail 6domubort and Coresponde ePPOeaGon I understand
Owners Signm
APPLICANT AFFIDAVIT
I. (we) am (are) the APPLICANT
this application; d I g this have familiarized cton � of the City of EIS gundo rty involved it
this and Ming this myself (ourselves) with the rules and
Preparing 9 application; and the information on all doeume all is true and eonew to the best of to
knowledge and belief. �, (ors)
2.7 �7
Date
Applicanirs Signature Dats
FOR PLANNING DIVISION USE ONLY
13 Copies of Plans
300' Notification Map
3 sets of Property Owner Labels ✓
2s it Envelopes with Postage j. s �•^/1S�_
ie., ed Supplemental Info Sheets
3 evisedO6, 97
idst -3.gst
r9a/Depasit Received $ Sa 9
Date Food. 76 tg—.jZ
Recstved W. D
7
I,G
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONAIRE
EXPLANATION
Jan 16, 1998
1. Proposed project / use is compatible with surrounding land uses and consistent with
General Plan.
2. This project is not residential and does not affect the Population and Housing
3. There are no unique geological features on the site that do not exist on the surrounding
land uses.
4. Due to the proposed pavement, there will be some impact on drainage absorption,
however it will be minimal and will not have an adverse effect on the surrounding uses or
ecological systems.
5. The proposed use would not alter the air quality standard; the use generates minimal
traffic (actually less than the previous use) and no mechanical exhaust.
6. The proposed use will not have an impact on the existing street systems, it actually
generates less traffic than the previous use (see Traffic Letter prepared by Kimely Hom)
7. There are no special biological resources on the site
B. There are no special energy or mineral resources on the site
9. There is no risk of safety or health hazards specific to this project, that would not be the
same as any other project. The storage unit leases specifically prohibit hazardous
materials and restrict the goods that will be stored in the units.
10. The proposed storage use will not result in any noise increase for the site. Self storage is
historically a passive use. Also, the noise generated from the street, adjacent industrial
uses and the railroad will be higher than any noise generated with in the project
11. Self storage uses minimal public services ( one toilet for water and waste, lighting only at
services
night for security for electrical) There will be no negative effect on the existing city
12. See response to #11
13. There is no scenic vista. The development will actually enhance the current streetscape.
14. There are no cultural resources on the site.
15. There will be no increased demand for recreational facilities imposed by the proposed
use. There typically will be one or two employees on the facilities,
16. The environment will not be affected by the proposed use. It may actually be benefited
by the use by cleaning up the site and providing a facility to store items that may
otherwise be stored in the environment.
153
154
f
Name
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
AND BUILDING SAFETY
Ulf �,
SEP 1 81997
PLANNING DIVISWII'
350 Main Stree
EI Segundo, CA 90245
•' (310) 322 -4670
FAX (310) 322 -4167
APPLICATION FOR A ZONE CHANGE P�v fat
PROJECT NO. '4 ai 7_iF L444
z C 9� -3
Date:Sj /7, y7
X99 -rGOS RaB� _ cBr .
(Check-OW
Owner _ Lessee &_ Agent
Property
Name
Genera �•
Locatio : /)
a :.?Address and!
Existing Zoning: .O
l�s��✓R, ch 9i /d�
LA — _
Address I
Phone c-92 O
S62 • -ei"7/ • 29,
Phone
description. Provide attachment B necessary)
between_ pgAQ?7�j(
Street, Avenue
' jokr/n/G 200/`5 Q*tWVL fj?prYl
Request: Under the provisions of Title 20, Section 20.86 of the Municipal Code, application for consideration of
a Zone Change for the above described property.
1. Does public necessity require the proposed change? is there a real need In the community for more of
the types of uses permitted by the Zone requested that can be accommodated in the areas already for
such zones? (Fully explain your answer, considering the surrounding property as well as the property
proposed to be reclassified) yCs 4 WR
RtnrT FsSe-/k-1nj5-X
fiRE FyLt �/tiAX�O o�fT. ?iliJ N fE' .4V1 dpi
To 7%E 4LVWM44 / /Ty.
2.
Is the property involved in the proposed reclassification more suitable for the purposes permitted in the
Proposed zone than for the purposes permitted in the present classification? (Answer oompletally; give
all reasons for your answer.) rE j ,yam Mq S'wrA�sw
''R4* i l
,rs�O y� /�' i1 LOW in'!F��
Tier JPfzi! -�< <nTr �T crick �iCEr� �4C ✓�/�ie Lam.,,
owl/ H' /Ar- 44=/A✓ yP Tye .P/1r' 0170,0 M7PROi� Tr'
?55
3. Would the uses permitted by the proposed zone change be detrimental in any way to the surrounding
property? (Explain reasons supporting your answers.)
AV. AoI PQOP� 4(z AV1sue 644W #P a .AT�� 'M� ssl/fsMkLC
TE dTACaW SnM 4V fV1, X-&W T� � L✓n� �R/}ic E/r}8�;
it 014 ClZr .SOIVI* PWsT., 0,-V' , FW . 6rd FP7
� U/ Av 1Im io/i. y c y r � /�it
. A-07 4. ad& IS AV ied � cto�^si y �nemg
type and class of uses on the proprty
involved? Give expiration date of these restrictions. (You may attach a copy of these restrictions, after
properly underscoring D N por portions that are in answer to this question.)
II OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT
�I We e n Q J[ rr %` i being duly sworn dispose and say tha�e am the
WNER of the property involved in this application and that Uwe have familiarized myself (ourselves) with the rules and
regulation of the City of El Segundo with respect to preparing and filing, this application and that the foregoing statements
herein contained and the information on documents and all plans attached hereto are in all respects true and correct to the
best of my /our knowledge and belief.
192, 7
Signature
Date
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
County of Los Angeles )as.
On this �I y' day of CZf-Ncv, l y�Ci/
it said county and State, personally appeared i, la 1
arson whose name �> s
to me that he/she executed he same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
before me,. the undersigned Notary Public in and
known to me to be the
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
COMM&-cwt i 11M56
Naftypith.: —ca to ft
state
I hereby authorize to act for me in all matters relevant to this application. I understand that this
person will be the exclusive contact on the project and will be sent all information and correspondence.
Owners Signature
AGENT AFFIDAVIT
I, We . .
AGENT of the property being duly sworn dispose and say that I/We am the
regulation of the pe of E Volved m this application and that Uwe have familiarized myself (ourselves) with the rules and
herein contained and the infOrrmaation on documents Preparing
nd all plans alrttagche8 herpeltp8 in all rest the foregoing statements
the best of my /our knowledge and belief. P true and correct to
,19
Signature Date
'56
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
County of Los Angeles )ss.
r_ .
this day of 19. before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and
for said county and State, personally appeared
person whose name known to me to be the
to me that he/she executed he same. subscribe to the within instrument, and acknowledged
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public in and for said County and state
Procedures for fliirtg application
1. File application property completed in the office of the Planning Department. Signature of the owner, owners,
lessee, and/or agent shall be notarized before a Notary Public.
2. Applicant shall provide all information, drawings and other materials as requested by the Planning Department.
3. Pay filing fee.
4. Applicant and affected property owners will be notified of time of hearing.
5. Applicant must be present at the hearing and may offer aditional evidence to support his/her request.
6. There shall be an additional fee for filing an appeal.
Planning Staff:
Date received
Signature
ZC.APP
EA. _E A--q-a7
Z.C. 47— 4
&PA 9-7-Li-
157
T_;
Tim L�:
C ,
t�•
r.
r
�j
r • .L' .
j r J •l
T
f.
u
k`. i
t �- .. _ _:
� } is
t,} _ �
�,
;l
;jw.;
�: � ,:.
a� ._��.�.._
—_ � _
,' , �
t . C�:.
• � �.
i : �,_
;-
� ;, f
'��
;�
�'+ j �
��� ,.
r,
�.,
I
/� �
�� �
t.
CF.
Y.
�,
6
� I�
��
`
�.
G
,'"
r,
�.,
I
/� �
�� �
t.
CF.
,,
,� .
6
� I�
��
l _
�,
{
I�r
r!
N.
OR
ij-
ti
I 1�
� f lis
01 yy A
��•.. #'i � i t� '��):'��{'c t h Vie¢ i
ry1 ) �. Y•
1
4 5.
, eit
JIM, A
3
• T
i'
1
� j Y
� � �i �. , f r'1 alit ti : y ! "•.
z
• $.R(. a : f1
.�. i„kxr_ot i al
i
�� 1. t� i.. •--� ^4 Suit fi
• 4y: b �� bw �.
y 1
JSt
i v
1 !
a
_ r
rw '-1
J. rip,
=M f
1
"45
04,
► 7V
If',
c -tor
A y n+�w t� LE G .n ems.. �� Cam! page of
14 October, 1999
To: The Planning Commission
City of El Segundo �M-
Nrom: The Undersigned (El Segundo only sueetaddressea included) {
C.
Suhject: Appeal for privacy and noise reduction provisions on thew
border of the proposed city park L±
Reference: Notice of Public Hearing agenda item 1. Fnvironment21 Assessment
EA -470, Development of Aviation Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue
[and leasing of subject property by SCE to the City for purposes of 322`2289
constructing a city park] wrA r-so h Z
Honorable Planning Commission Members: e o r f ti 1,'n k, n e t
We appreciate your efforts in developing a plan for constructing a city park on the
subject property. We feel that, if properly executed, this could be a desirable feature
for the city and an improvement on what is, otherwise, somewhat of an eyesore.
Nevertheless, we have concerns regarding both the risk to our privacy and the
putential for greatly increased noise and nuisance in our fives.
Accordingly, we suggest that the following provisions be included in the plan for the
park:
1) That there be a concrete or reinforced cinder block wall no less than 7 and no
greater than 8 feet in height constructed along the western boundary of the
proposed park,
2) That tress be planted as close to the wall as possible but such as to provide no
greater than about a 3-foot'overhang at maturity to, the west of the wall, the
purpose being to provide beauty to the park, noise abatement, and
inaccessibility to neighboring back yards by climbing. The selection of species
and spacing of the trees, we feel, should be such as to achieve merging growth
from the leaves and branches at maturity, i.e, filled in for maximum noise
reduction. The species should be of a type exhibiting minimal shedding and
should achieve a height at maturity of between 40 and 50 feet.
3) That any picnic facilities, playground facilities, and seating areal be placed at a
sufficient distance from the western boundary of the park so as to minimize the
effects of noise on bordering residents,
4) That no alcoholic beverages be allowed in the park,
5) That noisy devices such as boom boxes, CO2 home, sirens, etc. be prohibited,
6) That the hours of usage for both the park sad t6s rertrirtsd rrt ofpaWdq ,that 16
(item 7 below) be from no earlier than 0900 to no later than sunset, --
_1 I 1
OCT 2 0 IM
�M
0
pap of
(� -s 7) That there be some added parking, possibly diagonal parking of awn clseles: (1) a
"no- restriction" act consisting of a number of parking spaces roughly equivalent.
IUr w to the number of spaces currently accommodated on the west side of Illinois
such as to not penalize the residents along Illinois in teems of the on- street
parking available to them currently, and (2) a "restricted set" wherein pwking is
restricted to the times coinciding with the park "open" time (item 6 above) and,
of course, that the latter set be clearly marked as OD the allowable parking times.
R) That there be ample signor warning of specific and stiff penalties for violations
pertaining to the restricted set of parking spaces, failing to leave a picnic area
clean after usage, noisy and disruptive behavior, and possessing alcoholic
beverages on the property,
an d
1)) That any violators be vigorously prosecuted.
Thanks very much for your consideration of these suggestions. We feel that, as with
most of the parks in the city, this park can add to the community feeling of the city if
constructed properly and used responsibly. We feel that (1) these provisions will not
detract in any way from enjoyment of the park and (2) that they are likely to pose no
greater cost penalty than that attendant to the provisions of eitisting parks in the city
which border on residences. With confidence that you will do the right thing in
addressing these concerns, we are respectfully residents of Washington and Mariposa
Strects in the City of El Segundo,
v �jGYIPS �i' I ke�t"_s owl,>
oN J1�
yea � 5
a � ,
l/oo�r�5
CN4N". 9 NMI M�ii'1iY
/___1
167
#-
,I
• DO�VCVIA) ✓On/FS
itG,ta�rc�
r?
o
Y an L� uy
, �
�-o v L�j
19-
GL,��i Ka
• -1-c rr� 4a
A104( (J A,0%4
14va./
S� wA-54A1G -MP1 S-r.
of
5
Sri
S-r
16 p
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA
OCTOBER 14, 1999
Vice -Chair Wycoff called the regular meeting of the El Segundo Planning CALL TO ORDER
Commission to order at 6:05 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the City of El
Segundo City Hall, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, California.
Commissioner Kretzmer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PLEDGE TO FLAG
PRESENT: Kretzmer, Wycoff, Mahler(arrived at 6:20 pm), and Boulgarides ROLL CALL
EXCUSED ABSENCE: Chairman Crowley
CONSENT
Vice -Chair Wycoff presented the Consent Calendar. CALENDAR
Commissioner Boulgarides moved to accept Assessment EA -497, Adjustment MOTION
ADJ. 99 -2 — Wall Height and Fill Adjustment. Commissioner Kretzmer
seconded. Passed 3 -0.
Vice -Chair Wycoff requested correction of the September 23, 1999 Minutes on CALL ITEMS FROM"
page 2, fourth paragraph from the top, second sentence, to read, "He stated CONSENT
within the City's small residential area, there are limited opportunities and CALENDAR
limited areas for application of some of the Housing Programs." Also, on page
5, third paragraph from the top, second sentence, to read, "He said the Old
Town Music Hall should be included on the list of candidates."
Commissioner Boulgarides moved to accept the September 23, 1999 Minutes MOTION
as modified. Commissioner Kretzmer seconded. Passed 3 -0.
None. PUBLIC
COMMUNICATIONS
None. WRITTEN
COMMUNICATIONS
None. PUBLIC HEARINGS
CONTINUED
BUSINESS
Vice -Chair Wycoff presented Item 1 -3 Assessment EA -427, General Plan PUBLIC HEARINGS
Amendment GPA 974, Zone Change 97 -3, and Zone Text Amendment 98-6 — NEW BUSINESS
Mini - Storage Facility, Address: 700 South Douglas Street (between Douglas EA-427
Street and Aviation Boulevard). Applicant: Everest Storage. Property Owner: EA-470
10- 14min.PC
169
Southern California Edison.
Vice -Chair Wycoff presented Item 1 -3 Environmental Assessment EA -470,
Development Agreement DA 99 -1 — Douglas Street Extension. Address: 700
South Douglas Street (between Douglas Street and Aviation Boulevard).
Applicant: City of El Segundo. Property Owner: Southern California Edison.
Vice -Chair Wycoff opened the public hearing.
Charles Wilkerson, 502 Washington Street, El Segundo
He requested information regarding the status of the park plans. Ms. Jester
stated staff has recommended that the applications be continued to October
28, 1999 because the agreements with Southern California Edison are still
being worked out. She stated that Richard Williams in the Recreation and
Parks Department could be contacted for further information regarding the
plans for the parks.
Mr. Wilkerson stated that the residents have specific concerns regarding
privacy, tree planting, distances, parking, etc. Ms. Jester clarified that the
actions of the Planning Commission on the application if approved would be to
have a Development Agreement that would just allow the City to enter into a
lease agreement with Edison. Plans would then go to the Recreation and
Parks Commission with public meetings, at which time the public could provide
input on what the development plans would be for the parks. This would then
go to the City Council for final approval.
Jerry Hurst, 404 Washington Street, El Segundo
He asked if the suggestions of the public could be submitted. Ms. Jester
stated yes, and will have Mr. Williams contact Mr. Wilkerson.
Vice -Chair Wycoff closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Boulgarides requested an updated explanation concerning the
status of the project. Mr. Garry summarized the history and status of the
project. In summary, the City would gain additional parks and a roadway and
Southern California Edison would gain the opportunity for mini- storage.
Commissioner Kretzmer moved to continue EA-427 and EA-470 to the October MOTION
28, 1999 Meeting at 6 pm. Commissioner Boulgarides seconded. Passed 3 -0.
Vice -Chair Wycoff presented Item 1-4, Environmental Assessment EA -492 and EA-492
Precise Plan 99 -1 (Seventh Amendment to PP 12 -72) — Outdoor Dining and
Parking). Address: 2041 Rosecrans Avenue, and 831 and 871 South Nash
Street (Beach Cities Plaza). Applicant and Property Owners: Continental
Development Corporation (Mr. Jerry Saunders).
Assistant Planner Paul Garry summarized the staff report as outlined in the
agenda packet. He stated that the applicant submitted a letter requesting
some minor modifications to the Draft Resolution. The letter was distributed to
10- 14min.rc 2 170
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA
OCTOBER 28, 1999
Vice -Chair Wycoff called the regular meeting of the El Segundo Planning
CALL TO ORDER
Commission to order at 6:04 pm in the Council Chamber of the City of El
Segundo City Hall, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, California.
Commissioner Boulgarides led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
PLEDGE TO FLAG
PRESENT: KRETZMER, WYCOFF, MAHLER, BOULGARIDES AND
ROLL CALL
CROWLEY(excused absence).
Vice -Chair Wycoff presented the Consent Calendar.
CONSENT
Commissioner Kretzmer moved to accept the Consent Calendar.
CALENDAR
Commissioner Boulgarides seconded. Passed 4 -0.
MOTION
None. PUBLIC
COMMUNICATIONS
None.
WRITTEN
COMMUNICATIONb
Vice -Chair Wycoff presented Item H-4, Environmental Assessment EA -427, PUBLIC HEARINGS
General Plan Amendment GPA 97-4, Zone Change 97 -3, Zone Text CONTINUED
Amendment 98 -6, Environmental Assessment EA -470, and Development BUSINESS
Agreement DA 99 -1 — Aviation Specific Plan (Mini- Storage facility) and EA-427
Douglas Street Extension Development Agreement. Address: 700 South
Douglas Street (between Douglas Street and Aviation Boulevard). Property
Owner: Southern California Edison.
Assistant Planner Paul Garry summarized the staff report as outlined in the
Agenda Packet.
Vice -Chair Wycoff opened the public hearing.
Carl Beckmann, President of Everest Storage
He stated that the project represents the culmination of a great deal of effort of
all the parties involved and represents a win -win situation for the City, Edison
and Everest Storage. He described the two site plans on the board. He said
following the extension of Douglas Street, the project will be cut down to
approximately 246 units. He also indicated that the project is relatively small
and is all single story. He further presented a rendering of the project to the
Commission which was taken from the site.
10- 28min.doc 1
171
Commissioner Boulgarides indicated that the mini - storage facility will be an
improvement to what is located at the site currently. He suggested, however,
making the facility look more attractive than a row of roll -up beige garage
doors. He pointed out that the roofs will be highly visible.
Vice -Chair Wycoff closed the public hearing.
Vice -Chair Wycoff stated this facility would be an improvement to the land
creating some revenue to the City. He agreed with improving the appearance
of the facility such as with painting and more landscaping. He would like to
break up the large mass of the side of the building facing the Greenline.
Vice -Chair Wycoff re- opened the public hearing.
Mr. Beckmann stated that there is landscaping along the southerly property
line also which involves trees every 30 feet with shrubbery. He said that the
landscaping has to be compatible with being under the Edison power lines with
the height being limited to 15 feet due to safety, operational and access issues.
He indicated that they are willing to work with staff.
Commissioner Kretzmer suggested a type of aesthetic enhancer be
incorporated other than a row of uniform hedges.
Mr. Beckmann answered that it was a good idea and that he was not opposed
to.
Commissioner Mahler asked what type of businesses would be using the
storage. Mr. Beckman stated that typically a self - storage facility would vary
with 60% residential and 40% business. He said the business uses are
typically small businesses with small retail space and no storage. Also, he
stated they get contractors who will lease the space to store their goods and
materials. He indicated that vendors of swap meets also would store
materials. He suspects that this facility will be primarily residential because of
the proximity to the beach areas, the small nature of the houses, and the
dense population. He said the industrial type businesses in the area are large
users who wouldn't need the excess space. He pointed out, however, they
have been approached by the District Attorney's office to rent units to store
files, etc. He also noted that in terms of vehicles, mostly small vans and
pickups will be the users, and the traffic will be minimal.
Vice -Chair Wycoff reviewed the recommendations for modification of the
General Plan to change the site from Open Space to Aviation Speck Plan
and said it would be a better use of the land. Commissioner Boulgarides
agreed.
Commissioner Kretzmer clarified that park land will not be created as a result
of the Commission's approval tonight.
Vice -Chair Wycoff reviewed the five findings that need to be made in order to
modify the Development Agreement. He stated that it appears that the project
is in compliance with the intent of the five findings. He also said that it
10- 28min.doc
DRAFT
172
DRAFT
appears that all the interdepartmental comments have been addressed.
Commissioner Kretzmer clarified that Item 4 of Resolution No. 2432, should be
corrected to read, "The Specific Plan site is currently developed with several
abandoned greenhouse structures, and Southern California Edison
transmission towers, and was previously used as a commercial wholesale
landscape nursery."
Commissioner Boulgarides questioned what happens at the end of the 8 -year
duration of the Development Agreement. Mr. Garry stated that once the
entitlements are in place, the City would have 8 years to get the easement
granted for the roadways. Once the City exercises the easement, then the
road can be built. It does not have to be built within the 8 -year period. He also
stated regarding the park issue, there is 6 months from the time the
Development Agreement is executed to enter into the lease for the park land
which would run with the current term of the existing park license agreement.
Ms. Jester clarified that the lease agreement is a standard lease agreement
and has already been negotiated and approved. Mr. Garry noted that on
master page 70, the six months for exercising the offer for the park lease is
addressed and Section 9 on master page 71 states that both parties will work
diligently to provide all the documents needed to make sure that each site can
comply.
Commissioner Kretzmer suggested that some language could be added such
as a provision and exception for good cause extension of the six months date.
City Attorney John Luebberke noted that the Development Agreement
negotiations are continuing and the Commission's comments could be
incorporated.
Vice -Chair Wycoff closed the public hearing.
MOTION
Commissioner Kretzmer moved that the Planning Commission adopt EA -427,
General Plan Amendment GPA 97-4, Zone Change 97 -3, Zone Text
Amendment 98 -6, Environmental Assessment EA-470 and Development
Agreement DA 99 -1 — Aviation Specific Plan and Douglas Street Extension
Development Agreement and adopt Resolution No. 2432 as modified in Item 4.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Commissioner Boulgarides seconded. Passed 4 -0.
NEW BUSINESS
Vice -Chair Wycoff presented Item 1 -5, Environmental Assessment EA-485 —
EA-485
Chevron Refinery Electrical Distribution System Upgrade (Chevcentral).
Address: 324 West El Segundo Boulevard. Applicant and Property Owner:
Chevron Products Company, Robert Kott, Project Manager, Lily Craig, Public
Affairs Specialist.
Contract Planner Emmanuel Ursu summarized the staff report as outlined in
the Agenda Packet.
Vice-Chair Wycoff opened the public hearing.
10- 28min.doc 3
173
RESOLUTION NO. 2432
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL
OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT — 427 (EA427) AND
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT —470 (EA470),
CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL UgPACTS, AND
ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 974,
ZONE CHANGE 97 -3, ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT 98 -6,
AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 99 -1 FOR THE
AVIATION SPECIFIC PLAN AT 700 SOUTH DOUGLAS
STREET. (PROPERTY OWNER: SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON)
WHEREAS, Everest Storage, Southern California Edison, and the City of El Segundo have
requested said approvals; and,
WHEREAS, Environmental Assessments (EA -427 and EA -470), including Draft Initial
Studies and Negative Declarations of Environmental Impacts for the proposed use, have been
prepared and circulated to all interested part ies, staff, and affected public agencies for review and
comment in the time and manner prescribed by law; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the applications and supporting
evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act,
State CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No. 3805); and,
WHEREAS, on October 14 and 28, 1999, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to
law, duly advertised public hearings on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350
Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed
by law; and,
WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against the findings
of Environmental Assessment EA -427, EA -470, GPA 97 -4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, and DA 99 -1;
and,
WHEREAS, at said hearings the following facts were established:
1. The Specific Plan area site is located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo
approximately one -half (1/2) mile to the west of the San Diego Freeway [Interstate -405 (I-
405)].
2. The Specific Plan project area is approximately 5.4 acres (235,224 square feet).
1
1741
3. The Specific Plan project is generally bounded on the north by light industrial land uses, on
the south by Santa Fe railroad tracks and the MTA Green Line right -of -way, on the east by
Aviation Boulevard and on the west by Douglas Street. Local jurisdictions bordering or
near the site include the City of Manhattan Beach located immediately south of Rosecrans
Avenue and the City of Hawthorne locate to the east of Aviation Boulevard.
4. The Specific Plan site is currently developed with several abandoned greenhouse
structures, and Southern California Edison transmission towers, and was previously used as
a commercial wholesale landscape nursery.
5. The topography of the Specific Plan site is level and soils conditions are suitable for the
existing development.
6. Plant species present on the Specific Plan site are those that are commonly used for
landscaping purposes or which have adapted to urban environments. There is no known
rare or endangered animal species associated with the Project site, or proThe locale.
7. The Specific Plan site and immediate project locale, contains no known significant cultural,
historical, or scenic aspects.
8. The area surrounding the Specific Plan project site is highly urbanized. Land uses consist
of medium scale office, commercial, light - industrial, warehouse, research and
development, hotel, restaurant, and retail uses.
9. There are residential uses located approximately 150 feet from the eastern boundary of the
Specific Plan area, on the east side of Aviation Boulevard in the City of Hawthorne.
10. The Specific Plan project site is only visible from Douglas Street on the west, Aviation
Boulevard from the east and from the elevated Douglas Street MTA Green line Station
11. The City's General Plan designates the Specific Plan project site for Open Space. The
project site is zoned Open Space (O -S) Zone. The proposed Specific Plan area will be
designated Aviation Specific Plan (ASP) in the General Plan and Zoning Code.
12. Southern California Edison is the property owner for three parcels of land which would be
leased to the City for park purposes, include: 1) 0.61 acres located on Washington Street
between Walnut Avenue and Sycamore Avenue; 2) 2.05 acres located on Illinois Street
between Mariposa Avenue and Pine Avenue; and, 3) 1 acre located on Illinois Street
between Holly Avenue and Pine Avenue. These properties are zoned Open Space (O -S)
and are currently undeveloped.
13. The proposed terms of the Development Agreement would grant the City a License to use
the above referenced properties for park purposes for a term concurrent with the City's
current park license with Southern California Edison for the use of other Edison properties
for park purposes. The existing park license will expire in 2006. The proposed
Development Agreement would also allow for two five -year extensions of the park license.
2 175
The City would have six months from the approval of the Development Agreement to
exercise the lease offer.
14. The proposed Development Agreement provides for SCE to grant an easement to the City
for public roadway purposes to facilitate the construction of an extension of Douglas Street
adjacent to the Specific Plan area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after considering the above facts, the
testimony presented at the public hearings, and study of proposed Environmental Assessment
EA -427 &-470 (EA -427 & EA -470) GPA 97 -4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, and DA 99 -1, the Planning
Commission makes the following findings and recommends the City Council approve the
Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts of proposed Environmental
Assessment EA -427 and EA -470, and adopts the Aviation Specific Plan, GPA 97-4, ZC 97 -3,
ZTA 98 -6, and DA 99 -1:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
1. The Draft Initial Studies were made available to all local and affected agencies and for
public review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law. The Initial Studies
concluded that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the
environment, and Mitigated Negative Declarations of Environmental Impact will be
prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);
2. That when considering the whole record, there is no evidence that the proposed
modifications to the project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife
resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends, because the project is in a built -
out urban environment; and,
3. That the Planning Commission thereby recommends that the City Council authorize and
direct the Director of Planning and Building Safety to file with any appropriate agencies a
Certificate of Fee Exemption and de minimum finding pursuant to AB 3158 and the
California Code of Regulations. Within ten (10) days of the approval of the Mitigated
Negative Declarations of Environmental Impacts, the owner shall submit to the City of El
Segundo a fee of $25.00 required by the County of Los Angeles for the filing of this
certificate along with the required Notice of Determination. As approved in AB 3158, the
statutory requirements of CEQA will not be met and no vesting shall occur until this
condition is met and the required notices and fees are filed with the County.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
1. That the proposed use is consistent with the following General Plan goals, policies, and
objectives.
A. The proposed General Plan Land Use Designation for the Specific Plan site, as
well as the proposed zoning, is Aviation Specific Plan (ASP). The Aviation
Specific Plan designation is compatible with the surrounding Light Industrial and
Urban Mixed -Use South land use designations.
3 176
B. The proposed Aviation Specific Plan designation is designed to allow a maximum
floor area (FAR) ratio of 0.22 While this would permit a greater amount of
development than the existing Open Space land use designation, the total build
out of the plan area would be approximately 66,000 square feet which is an
insignificant increase in density compared to the anticipated total buildout of
approximately 56,000,000 square feet envisioned in the 1992 General Plan.
Findings must be made that the project is in conformance with the goals, policies
and objectives of the General Plan in order to approve the project. Interpretation
of conformity with the applicable provisions of the General Plan is a policy
decision that is at the discretion of the Planning Commission and the City
Council.
C. The proposed project is in conformance with many General Plan goals, policies
and objectives related to Economic Development, Land Use, Circulation and Air
Quality. The following Economic Development objectives and policies apply; ED
1 -1.1, ED 1 -1.2, ED 1 -2, ED 1 -2.1, ED 1 -2.2, and ED 1 -2.3, which relate to
prioritizing economic development, diversification of an economic base,
expanding the retail and commercial base, targeting industries that balance
economic development and quality of life goals, and balancing development with
resource and infrastructure capacity.
D. Many Land Use goals, policies and objectives apply including; LU 4, LU 4-1.1,
LU 4 -1.4, LU 4-3.6, LU 4-4, LU 4-4.4, LU 4-4.6, LU 4.5, LU 5 -3.1, LU 7 -1.2 and
LU 7 -2.3. These issues relate to providing a stable tax base, providing
landscaping, promoting commercial uses adjacent to the Green line, attracting
clean industrial uses, revitalizing industrial areas, encouraging alternative
transportation modes, providing good accessibility to transportation routes, and
requiring adequate public facilities and underground utilities.
E. Circulation Element policies and objectives also apply to the proposal including;
C1 -1.2, C1 -1.4, C1 -1.5, C1 -1.13, C1 -1.15, C 1 -2.1, C2 -1.1, C 2 -3.3, C 3 -1, C 3-
1.1, C 3 -1.2, C 3 -1.5, C 3 -1.7, and C 4-1.2. These policies identify the need to
aggressively implement the Master Plan roadway improvements, construct
missing roadway links, upgrade roadways to Circulation Element standards,
provide full examination of project traffic impacts and complete mitigation,
protect adequate right -of -way for future improvements, develop a hierarchy and
street classification system correlated to capacity and function, encourage the
development of pedestrian linkages to the Green Line stations, design facilities for
easy pedestrian access, evaluate circulation system impacts, full mitigation of all
project- related circulation impacts, integrate transportation with land uses and
surrounding environments, require developers to pay for mitigation measures,
provide for adequate pedestrian and bicycle access, and evaluation of project
impacts on CMP routes.
4 177
F. The policies and objectives which apply to the proposed project are contained
within the Air Quality Element including; AQ 7 -1.1 and AQ 12 -1.2, which relate
to requiring conformance with the SCAQMD PMio standards and encouraging
energy conservation features in new building design.
G. The final policies and objectives which apply to the proposed project are
contained within the Open Space and Recreation Element including: OS 1 -4, OS 1-
4.1, and OS 1-4.2, which are devoted to developing utility transmission corridors
for active and passive open space and recreational uses. These objectives and
policies suggest working with Southern California Edison to protect and maintain
existing linear parks and landscaping within utili ty rights -of -way. Since this
Specific Plan area is not currently used as a park or is not landscaped for a passive
use, conversion of the property would not tend to contradict Policy OS1-
4.1.However, Policy OS14.2, encourages the City to continue to expand
landscaping and recreational uses along the utility rights -of -way. Approval of the
proposed project would appear to diminish a future opportunity for a 5.4 acre
utility corridor to be used for landscaping or recreational use in a way that would
be an amenity for the community, although there is no residential community in
El Segundo within the Specific Plan vicinity. However, approval of the
Development Agreement will provide the City the opportunity to increase the
inventory of park and recreation facilities in the residential portion of the City by
leasing three properties totaling 3.66 acres of SCE utility corridor for park
purposes. These properties are currently vacant parcels which provide only a
limited amenity to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Environmental Assessment EA-427 & -470
(EA -427 & EA -470), GPA 97-4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, and DA 99 -1, and adopts changes to the El
Segundo Municipal Code as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 20.16.020 of Chapter 20.16, Title 20, of the El Segundo Municipal
Code is amended to read as follows:
20.16.020 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONES.
In order to classify, regulate, restrict and segregate the uses of lands and
buildings, to regulate and restrict the height and bulk of buildings, to regulate the
area of yards and other open spaces about buildings and to regulate the density of
population, the City has adopted the following specific plan areas which function
as the Zoning Code for specific areas.
1 • Smoky Hollow Specific Plan
There are four (4) classes of use zones intended to be used within the
boundaries of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan. These zones include:
5 178
GAC - Grand Avenue Commercial Zone.
MDR - Medium Density Residential Zone.
SB - Small Business Zone.
MM - Medium Manufacturing Zone.
2. 124`h Street Specific Plan
There is one (1) use zone intended to be used within the boundaries of the
Aviation Specific Plan. This zone is:
124" SP - 124` Street Specific Plan Zone
3. Aviation Specific Plan
There is one (1) use zone intended to be used within the boundaries of the
Aviation Specific Plan. This zone is:
ASP - Aviation Specific Plan Zone.
The foregoing Zones are separate Zones and shall not be deemed to be more
restrictive or less restrictive than any other Zone, but shall be limited to the uses
permitted in the specified Zone.
SECTION 2. The Aviation Specific Plan is hereby adopted as set forth in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 3. The Land Use designations ("Commercial Designations" subsection) and
the proposed Land Use Plan ( "Southeast Quadrant' subsection) of the Land Use Element are
hereby amended to reflect the change of a portion of the Southern California Edison right -of -way
at 700 South Douglas Street from Open Space to Aviation Specific Plan. The corresponding
changes to the Land Use Element as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference, are also hereby approved.
SECTION 4. The 1992 General Plan Summary of Existing Trends Buildout (Exhibit
LU -3) of the Land Use Element is hereby amended to reflect the change of a portion of the
Southern California Edison right -of -way at 700 South Douglas Street from Open Space to
Aviation Specific Plan. The corresponding changes to the Land Use Element as set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are also hereby approved.
SECTION 5. The General Plan Land Use Map is hereby changed to reflect the change
for a portion of the Southern California Edison right -of -way at 700 South Douglas Street from
Open Space to Aviation Specific Plan. The corresponding changes to the Land Use Map as set
forth in Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are also hereby
approved.
SECTION 6. The Summary of Existing Conditions and Private Facilities sections of the
Open Space and Recreation Element are hereby amended to reflect the change of a portion of the
Southern California Edison right -of -way at 700 South Douglas Street from Open Space to
6 179
Aviation Specific Plan. The corresponding changes to the Land Use Element as set forth in
Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are also hereby approved.
SECTION 7. The Private Open Space and Recreational Facilities Lands Map (Exhibit
OS -2) of the Open Space and Recreation Element is hereby amended to eliminate a portion of
the Southern California Edison right -of -way at 700 South Douglas Street from Private Open
Recreation Element
Space and Recreational Facilities Lands Map. The corresponding changes to the Open Space and
reference, are also hereby approved. set forth d Exhibit F, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
.
SECTION 8. The current Zoning Map is hereby amended to reflect a change for a
portion of the Southern California Edison right -of -way at 700 South Douglas Street from Open
Space to Aviation Specific Plan. The corresponding changes to the Zoning Map as set forth in
Exhibit G, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are also hereby approved.
SECTION 9. The Development Agreement by and Between the City of El Segundo and
Southem California Edison is hereby adopted as set forth in Exhibit H, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Plannin
hereby recommends to the City Council approval g Commission
of Environmental ,Assessment EA -427 and EA-
470, GPA 97 -4, ZC 97 -3, ZTA 98 -6, and DA 99 -1, subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to approval of the building plans, the owner shall develop plans, which indicate that
the proposed mini- storage facility is in substantial conformance with the Aviation
Specific Plan and plans approved and on file with the Department of Planning and
Building Safety. Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred
to the Director of Planning and Building Safety for a determination regarding the need for
Planning Commission review of the proposed modification.
2. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the mini- storage facility, the owner
shall pay a one -time Library Services Mitigation Fee of $0.03 per gross square foot of
building and storage unit floor area.
3. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the mini- storage facility, the owner
shall pay a one -time Fire Services Mitigation Fee of $0.14 per gross square foot of
building and storage unit floor area.
4• Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the mini- storage facility, the owner
shall pay a one -time Police Services Mitigation Fee of $0.11 per gross square foot of
building and storage unit floor area.
5. Prior to approval of the building plans, the owner shall submit plans which demonstrate
conformance with the elements outlined in the memos from the Police Department, dated
February 4 and October 6, 1998, which are on file in the Planning Division. The security
measures shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or
implemented prior to operation, as appropriate.
7
180
6. Prior to approval of the building plans, the owner shall submit a Fire/Life Safety pl to
the Fire Chief which includes, but is not limited to, the following: an
A. Fire lane signage;
B. Fire lane accessibility.
All Fire/Life Safety Plan requirements must be installed and operational, and any
required easements or documents recorded, prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
7. The owner shall pay the City Attorney =s costs for preparing or reviewing the fire lane
access easement, or any such easements or agreements required.
8• A Landscaping and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted by the owner to the Director of
Planning and Building Safety, Director of Recreation and Parks, and Police Chief prior to
approval of the building plans. Landscaped areas shall be provided with a permanent
automatic watering or irrigation system and shall be permanently maintained in a neat
and clean manner. The owner, if feasible, shall incorporate provisions for the use of
reclaimed water in the Landscaping and Irrigation Plan. The plan shall be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety, Director of Recreation and
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, Parks, and Police Chief, and installed per the approved plans by the owner prior to the
9. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the owner shall submit a Master Sign
Plan to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area and the criteria objectives of the
General Plan and Aviation Specific Plan, as well as to ensure that signs do not impede
traffic or pedestrian safety. The Master Sign Plan shall be subject to the approval of the
Director of Planning and Building Safety and police Chief and all signs shall be installed
per the approved plan prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
10. During construction, the entire project site shall be enclosed by a six-foot high chain link
fence. Gates for site fencing shall not open over sidewalk/public right -of- -way. A fencing
plan shall be submitted by the owner and reviewed and approved by the Director of
Planning and Building Safety prior to installation.
11. All work within the City public right -of- -way shall be in accordance with the latest edition
of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and City of El Segundo
Standard Specifications. No work shall be performed in the public right -of- -way without
first obtaining a Public Works permit.
12. Prior to approval of the building plans, plans shall indicate that all proposed utilities shall
be placed underground to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The owner shall assume
the costs for the relocation of all utilities, including but not limited to, light poles,
electrical vaults, and fire hydrants which are affected by the proposed project.
181
13. Encroachment permits must be obtained from the Engineering Division of the Public
Works Department for demolition haul -off. Permits must be obtained at the same time the
permit for demolition is issued. An encroachment permit for grading is also required
when import or export of dirt exceeds fifty (50) cubic yards. Demolition and grading may
be listed on one encroachment permit.
14. Prior to approval of the building plans, plans shall show the location and design of all
proposed trash enclosures to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building
Safety and the Police Chief. Plans shall also indicate that the trash area will incorporate
adequate space for the collection of recyclable materials.
15. If new sewer laterals are required and constructed in the public right -of -way they shall be
a minimum of six (6) inches inside diameter. Material shall be "vitreous clay pipe ". Each
lateral shall have a six (6) inch clean-out brought to grade at the property line and
securely capped. A B9 size box shall be placed around the C.O. for protection. The box
shall have a cover emblazoned with the word "sewer ". If in a traffic area, cover shall be
traffic approved. All planned sewer connections shall be checked for elevation pror to
starting construction. Existing sewer laterals shall be plugged at the sewer d
capped at the property line. Existing six (6) inch wyes may be reused if appro in an
ived by the
Director of Public Works.
16. No material storage is allowed in the public right -of- -way except by permit issued by the
Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. If material storage is allowed in
the public right -of -way it shall be confined to parkway areas and street parking areas, as
long as safe and adequate pedestrian and vehicular passage is maintained at all times.
Storage beyond these areas in the public right -of -way requires prior approval of the
Public Works Department and shall be limited to a maximum period of 24 hours.
17. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, new curbs, sidewalk, driveway approaches, wheelchair
ramps and A.C. pavement, including alleys, shall be constructed/reconstructed as
required by the Director of Public Works. Existing driveways and other concrete work
not to be incorporated into the construction shall be removed and replaced with standard
curb and sidewalk.
18. Should any previously unrecorded archeological or cultural resources be encountered
during construction of the project, all work will be stopped and the Department of
Planning and Building Safety will be notified immediately. At the owner's expense a
qualified archeologist will be consulted to determine the potential significance of the
find, and his findings shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Building Safety
prior to the commencement of work.
19. The owner shall submit the appropriate documentation to show conformance with or
exemption from the State Water Quality Control Board's National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for construction related stormwater run -off to the
Director of Public Works prior to the approval of the building plans.
9
182
f `
20. During construction dust control measures shall be required in accordance with the Cit}�s
Dust Control Ordinance. Grading will be discontinued during arsons n n smog alerts and
suspended during periods whigh wind (i.e. over 15 miles per hour). All hauling bucks
shall have loads covered or wetted and loaded below the sideboards to IIIinimi,
e dust.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that according to the El
copy of this Resolution shall be mailed to the owner at th e egundo Municipal Code, a
e address shown on the application and
to any other person requesting a copy of same. The decision of the Planning Commission as set
forth in this Resolution shall become final and effective ten
the Planning Commission action, unless an appeal (10) calendar days after the date of
in writing is flied with the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of October 1999.
J es . Hansen,
Inle ' Director of Planning and Building
Safety; and, Secretary of the Planning
Commission of the City
of El Segundo, California
VOTES
Crowley (Chair) - Absent
Wycoff (Vice- Chair) - Aye
Boulgarides - Aye
Kretzmer - Aye
Mahler - Aye
Gary Wyco$ rce Haan
of the Planning Commission
of the City of El Segundo,
California
P:1Planning & Building Saf' Wl' o" M426-4501EA- 4271EA- 427.RES -2.doc
10
1 RJ
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 16, 1999
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Special Orders of Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Oublic hearing on a Conditional Use Permit to allow kennel (overnight boarding) operations at an existing dog day care facility,
ind, certification of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts. (Environmental Assessment EA-487 and Conditional
Use Permit CUP 99 -3.) Address: 202 Illinois Street, #B. Applicant: John Corrales, Grateful Dogs, P.D.S., Inc. Property
Owner: Stanley Novak
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Open public hearing;
2) Discussion;
3) Reading of Resolution by title only;
4) By motion, adopt Resolution approving the project; and /or,
5) Other possible action /direction.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow kennel operations at an existing dog day care facility
located at 202 Illinois Street, #B. The request will permit a maximum of eight dogs during any one night and the average length
of stay would be between four and five nights.
This item was presented to the Planning Commission on October 28, 1999. At the public hearing, the Planning Commission
voted (4 -0) to approve the outdoor dog day care on the site and to recommend approval of the proposed kennel operations.
Indoor dog day care is allowed as a permitted use in the Zone (pursuant to Administrative Determination AD 98 -22) and
kennels require City Council approval, in accordance with Section 8.12.130 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. Resolution
No. 2456 reflects this approval and recommends that the City Councit approve EA -487 and CUP 99 -3.
A more complete project description, analysis, and background information are included in the accompanying Planning
Commission staff report and its attachments, which were also previously distributed to the City Council on October 22, 1999.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
An Initial Study /Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts is required to evaluate the potential significant impacts which
may be caused by the proposed project. The draft Initial Study /Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts was prepared,
as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and City Council Resolution No. 3805; and, was available for
the 20 day public review period from October 8 through October 28, 1999. No comments were received from any of the City
Departments or the public.
it
1. (draft) City Council Resolution No. _
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2456.
3. Planning Commission Staff Report and attachments, October 28, 1999.
4. (draft) Planning Commission Minutes, October 28, 1999.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ORIGINATED BY: Date: November4,1999
ACTION
Date:
PAPlanning & Building SafetytPROJECTS 1476 <991EA- 487Nagenda item statement L
184
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EL SEGUNDO CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT — 487 (EA487) AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-3 (CUP 99 -3) TO ALLOW
THE OPERATION OF A KENNEL FACILITY AT 202
ILLINOIS STREET, #B. PETITIONED BY: JOHN
CORRALES, GRATEFUL DOGS P.D.S., INC. PROPERTY
OWNER: STANLEY NOVAK.
WHEREAS, on June 10, 1999, an application was received from John Corrales
of Grateful Dogs P.D.S., Inc. requesting approval of an Environmental Assessment and
Conditional Use Permit in the Medium Manufacturing (MM) Zone to allow kennel
(overnight boarding) operations at an existing indoor dog day care facility;
WHEREAS, an inter - Departmental correspondence has been prepared and
circulated along with the application and initial study for the proposed use for inter-
departmental comments;
WHEREAS, Environmental Assessment EA -487, including a Draft Initial Study
and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for the proposed use, has been
prepared and circulated to all interested parties and staff for review and comment in the
time and manner prescribed by law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and
supporting evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California
Environmental Quality Act, State CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo
Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act
(Resolution No. 3805);
WHEREAS, on October 28, 1999, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant
to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the
City Hall,, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form,
and manner prescribed by law and at that meeting, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. 2456 recommending approval to the City Council of the Conditional Use
Permit and Environmental Assessment for the kennel operations;
WHEREAS, on November 16, 1999, the City Council did hold, pursuant to law, a
duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the City Council Chamber of the City
Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form, and
manner prescribed by law;
WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against
the findings of Environmental Assessment EA-487 and Conditional Use Permit CUP 99-
3; and,
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING EA-487 and CUP 9&3
11/1/99 12:00 p.m. PAGE NO. 1
185
WHEREAS, at said hearings the following facts were established:
1. The applicant is proposing to expand the existing use of the site as an indoor dog
day care facility to include kennel (overnight boarding) operations.
2. The project site is an existing indoor dog day care comprised of approximately
4,000 square feet of indoor dog day care, including six (6) suites for the proposed
kennel. The site can accommodate approximately six (6) vehicles in the
driveway.
3. The dog day care facility watches a maximum of 30 to 35 dogs per day, and
proposes to board a maximum of eight dogs per night. The hours of the
operation for the day care are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., daily. It is anticipated
that the average length of stay for the overnight kennel operations would be
between four and five nights.
4. The outdoor area of the facility is anticipated to be used on an as- needed basis,
for approximately two to three hours at a time, once or twice a day. For dogs that
will be kept overnight in the kennel facility, an additional outdoor "play time" may
be incorporated in the evening, but will cease no later than 9:00 p.m.
5. The surrounding area is currently developed with a research and development
and light industrial company to the north, the City's Maintenance yard to the
south, a nursery to the east, and a wholesale company to the west.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after considering the above facts,
the testimony presented at the public hearings, and study of proposed Environmental
Assessment EA-487 and Conditional Use Permit CUP 99 -3, the City Council makes the
following findings and approves EA-487 and CUP 99 -3,
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
1. An Initial Study was prepared for the project which identified potential impacts on
air, noise, land use, natural resources, risk of upset, and transportation/
circulation. Completion of this study revealed that the proposed project will not
have a significant, adverse effect on the environment. Pursuant to the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) a Negative
Declaration of Environmental. Impacts was prepared;
2. That when considering the whole record, there is no evidence that the project will
have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on
which the wildlife depends, because the project is in a built -out urban
environment; and,
3. That the City Council hereby authorized the Interim Director of Planning and
Building Safety to file with the appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING EA -487 and CUP 99.3
11/1/99 12:00 p.m. PAGE NO.2 186
Exemption and De Minimus finding pursuant to California Assembly Bill (AB) No.
3158 and the California Code of Regulations. Within ten (10) days of this
approval, the applicant shall submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of $25.00
required by the County of Los Angeles, for the filing of this certificate along with
the required Notice of Determination of Negative Declaration. As approved in AB
No. 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA will not be met and no vesting
shall occur until this condition is met and the required notices are filed with the
County.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
1. That the proposed use is consistent with the existing General Plan Land Use
Designation of Smoky Hollow Mixed Use.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives
of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located (the
MM Zone). The use is consistent with the objectives of the Zoning Code and the
purposes of the MM Zone, provided approval of a CUP is obtained. The purpose
of the MM Zone is to provide the opportunity for industrial and manufacturing
uses. Although the use is not industrial or manufacturing, it has no adverse
effects on these types of uses and is compatible with the existing use on the site.
Additionally, the project site is located within the Smoky Hollow area of the City,
as defined by the General Plan, which promotes a variety of land uses. The type
of use proposed is relatively unique in that there is a small number of this type of
facility in the area.
2. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which
it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity. Because the site is currently operating as an indoor dog day care facility,
expanding the operations to include overnight boarding would not be expected to
cause any further impacts if the conditions of approval are met. Such conditions
are expected to adequately address any concerns related to health, safety,
welfare, and injury to properties and improvements in the vicinity of the facility.
Additionally, the project as proposed will not increase the maximum number of
dogs using the facilities, and the operational characteristics will ensure that there
will not be impacts.
3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable
Provisions of Chapter 20.74. By obtaining approval of the use of the site for
kennel operations by the City Council (with prior_ recomrhendation from the
Planning Commission), the facility will operate in compliance with the applicable
Provisions of the Zoning Code.
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING EA-487 and CUP 933
11/1/99 12:00 p.m. PAGE NO.3
"loom
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council
approves Environmental Assessment EA -487 and Conditional Use Permit CUP 99 -3,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred to the
Director of Planning and Building Safety for a determination regarding the need
for City Council review and approval of the proposed modification.
2. After final approval by the City Council, the applicant shall contact Animal Control
to perform a site inspection and obtain the required licensing from Animal
Control. A copy of the approval from Animal Control shall be submitted to the
Planning Division prior to operation of the facility, issuance of a business license,
or within 30 days from the approval of the project, whichever is sooner.
3. Prior to the issuance of a permit or business license, or within 30 days from the
approval of this project, whichever is sooner, the applicant shall pay a one -time
fire services mitigation fee of fourteen (14) cents per gross square foot of building
floor area.
4. Prior to the issuance of a permit or business license, or within 30 days from the
approval of this project, whichever is sooner, the applicant shall pay a one -time
library services mitigation fee of three (3) cents per gross square foot of building
floor area.
5. Prior to the issuance of a permit or business license, or within 30 days from the
approval of this project, whichever is sooner, the applicant shall pay a one -time
police services mitigation fee of eleven (11) cents per gross square foot of
building floor area.
6. Prior to the issuance of a permit or business license, or within 30 days from the
approval of this project, whichever is sooner, the applicant shall pay the required
Traffic Mitigation Fee as determined by the Public Works Director.
7. The applicant shall indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless the City, its
elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees from and against
any and all claims, actions, causes of action, proceedings, or suits which
challenge or attack the validity of the City's approval of Environmental
Assessment EA-487 and Conditional Use Permit CUP 99 -3.
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING EA-487 and CUP 9&3
11/1/99 12:00 p.m. PAGE NO. 4 188
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that according to the El Segundo Municipal Code,
the decision of the City Council as set forth in this Resolution shall become final and
effective ten (10) calendar days after the date of the City Council action, unless an
appeal in writing is filed with the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of November, 1999.
Mike Gordon, Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 1
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the forgoing
Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and
signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 16"' day of November, 1999, and the same was so passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
lvlark D. H City Attorney
RESOLUTION N0.
APPROVING EA-487 and CUP 99.3
11N/99 12:00 p.m. PAGE NO. 5 189
FISH
RESOLUTION NO. 2456
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT EA-487 AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT CUP 99 -3 TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF
AN OUTDOOR DOG DAY CARE AND RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE
OPERATION OF A KENNEL FACILITY AT 202 ILLINOIS
STREET, #B. PETITIONED BY: JOHN CORRALES,
GRATEFUL DOGS P.D.S., INC. PROPERTY OWNER:
STANLEY NOVAK
WHEREAS, on June 10, 1999, an application was received from John Corrales of
Grateful Dogs P.D.S., Inc. requesting approval of an Environmental Assessment and Conditional
Use Permit in the Medium Manufacturing (NM Zone to allow an outdoor dog day care and
kennel (overnight boarding) operations at an existing indoor dog day care facility;
WHEREAS, an inter - Departmental correspondence has been prepared and circulated
along with the application and initial study for the proposed use for inter - departmental
comments;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed Environmental Assessment EA-
487, Initial Study and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts, and the supporting
evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act,
State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No. 3805);
WHEREAS, on October 28, 1999, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to law, a
duly advertised public hearing on such matter and notice of the public hearing was given the
time, form, and manner prescribed by law;
WHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was given to all persons present to present
testimony or documentary evidence for or against the findings of Environmental Assessment
EA -487 and Conditional Use Permit CUP 99 -3; and,
WHEREAS, at said hearing the following facts were established:
1 The applicant is proposing to expand the existing use of the site as an indoor dog day care
facility to include outdoor dog day care and kennel (overnight boarding) operations.
2. The project site is an existing indoor dog day care comprised of approximately 4,000
square feet of indoor dog day care, including six (6) suites for the proposed kennel and
approximately 1,000 square feet of enclosed outdoor area for the proposed outdoor dog
day care. The site can accommodate approximately six (6) vehicles in the driveway.
190
3. The dog day care facility watches a maximum of 30 to 35 dogs per day, and proposes to
board a maximum of eight dogs per night. The hours of the operation for the day care are
from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., daily. It is anticipated that the average length of stay for the
overnight kennel operations would be between four and five nights.
4. The outdoor area of the facility is anticipated to be used on an as- needed basis, for
approximately two to three hours at a time, once or twice a day. For dogs that will be
kept overnight in the kennel facility, an additional outdoor "play time" may be
incorporated in the evening, but will cease no later than 9:00 p.m.
5. The surrounding area is currently developed with a research and development and light
industrial company to the north, the City's Maintenance yard to the south, a nursery to
the east, and a wholesale company to the west.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after consideration of the above facts
of proposed Environmental Assessment EA -487 and Conditional Use Permit CUP 99 -3, the
Planning Commission finds as follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
1. An Initial Study was prepared for the project which identified potential impacts on air,
noise, land use, natural resources, risk of upset, and transportation/circulation.
Completion of this study revealed that the proposed project will not have a significant,
adverse effect on the environment. Pursuant to the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts
was prepared;
2. That when considering the whole record, there is no evidence that the project will have
the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the
wildlife depends, because the project is in a built -out urban environment; and,
3. That the Planning Commission hereby authorized the Interim Director of Planning and
Building Safety to file with the appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and
De Minimus finding pursuant to California Assembly Bill (AB) No. 3158 and the
California Code of Regulations. Within ten (10) days if this approval, the applicant shall
submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of $25.00 required by the County of Los Angeles,
for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of Determination of
Negative Declaration. As approved in AB No. 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA
will not be met and no vesting shall occur until this condition is met and the required
notices and fees are filed with the County.
CONDITIONAL USE PERNUT
1. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the
Zoning Code and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located (the MM Zone).
2 191
The use is consistent with the objectives of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the MM
Zone, provided approval of a CUP is obtained. The purpose of the MM Zone is to
provide the opportunity for industrial and manufacturing uses. Although the use is not
industrial or manufacturing, it has no adverse effects on these types of uses and is
compatible with the existing use on the site. Additionally, the project site is located
within the Smoky Hollow area of the City, as defined by the General Plan, which
promotes a variety of land uses. The type of use proposed is relatively unique in that
there is a small number of this type of facility in the area.
2. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would
be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare,
or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Because the site is
currently operating as an indoor dog day care facility, expanding the operations to include
outdoor use and overnight boarding, would not be expected to cause any further impacts
if the conditions of approval are met. These conditions of approval are in regard to noise,
animal waste, lighting, runoff to drains, and obtaining Animal Control approval. Such
conditions are expected to adequately address any concerns related to health, safety,
welfare, and injury to properties and improvements in the vicinity of the facility.
Additionally, the project as proposed will not increase the maximum number of dogs
using the facilities, and the operational characteristics will ensure that there will not be
impacts.
3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of
Chapter 20.74. By obtaining approval of the use of the site for outdoor dog day care by
the Planning Commission and approval for the kennel operations by the City Council
(with prior recommendation from the Planning Commission), the facility will operate in
compliance with the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code.
GENERAL PLAN AND DOMING CONSISTENCY
1. That the proposed use is consistent with the existing General Plan Land Use Designation
of Smoky Hollow Mixed Use.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
hereby approves Environmental Assessment EA-487 and Conditional Use Permit CUP 99 -3 with
regard to the outdoor dog day care and recommends approval of EA-487 and CUP 99 -3 to the
City Council with regard to the operation of a kennel, subject to the following conditions:
1. Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred to the Director
of Planning and Building Safety for a determination regarding the need for Planning
Commission review and approval of the proposed modification.
2. All drains on -site shall be kept clear of debris, feces, wood chips, and mulch and no
additional runoff attributed to the outdoor use of the site -for a dog day care shall be
generated.
3
�4^
L
3. Prior to issuance of a permit or a business license or within 30 days from the approval of
this project, whichever is sooner, a Lighting Plan, including a photometric study, shall be
submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. The exterior lighting plan
shall indicate that neighboring properties will not be effected by the use of outdoor
illumination. Lighting shall, be installed per the approved plans prior to building permit
final, occupancy of the project, or within 60 days from the approval of this project,
whichever is sooner.
4. All feces shall be immediately picked up and disposed of in a sealed bag or container.
All areas shall be kept clean and odors controlled.
5. If complaints are received by neighboring properties with regard to noise generated on
the site, the operations of the facility shall be modified. Such modification may include,
but is not limited to, moving dogs indoors that bark excessively, limiting the number of
dogs outside at any one time, and limiting the length of time that the dogs are permitted
outside.
6. After final approval by the Planning Commission and City Council, the applicant shall
contact Animal Control to perform a site inspection and obtain the required licensing
from Animal Control. A copy of the approval from Animal Control shall be submitted to
the Planning Division prior to operation of the facility, issuance of a business license, or
within 30 days from the approval of the project, whichever is sooner.
7. Prior to the issuance of a permit or business license, or within 30 days from the approval
of this project, whichever is sooner, the applicant shall pay a one -time fire services
mitigation fee of fourteen (14) cents per gross square foot of building floor area and
outdoor play area.
8. Prior to the issuance of a permit or business license, or within 30 days from the approval
of this project, whichever is sooner, the applicant shall pay a one -time library services
mitigation fee of three (3) cents per gross square foot of building floor area and outdoor
play area.
9. Prior to the issuance of a permit or business license, or within 30 days from the approval
of this project, whichever is sooner, the applicant shall pay a one -time police services
mitigation fee of eleven (11) cents per gross square foot of building floor area and
outdoor play area.
10. Prior to the issuance of a permit or business license, or within 30 days from the approval
of this project, whichever is sooner, the applicant shall pay the required Traffic
Mitigation Fee as determined by the Public Works Director.
11. The applicant shall indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless the City, its elected and
appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims,
actions, causes of action, proceedings, or suits which challenge or attack the validity of
4
the City's approval of Environmental Assessment EA-487 and Conditional Use Permit
CUP 99 -3.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that according to the El Segundo Municipal Code, the
Secretary of the Planning Commission shall mail a copy of this Resolution to the applicants at
the address shown on the application and to any other person requesting a copy. The decision of
the Planning Commission as set forth in this Resolution shall become final and effective ten (10)
calendar days after the date of the Planning Commission action unless within such ten (10)
calendar day period an appeal in writing is filed with the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 28`h day of October 1999.
JapAes Y. Hansen, Interim Director
of Planhing and Building Safety; and,
Secretary to the Planning Commission
VOTES
Crowley — Absent
Wycoff — Aye
Boulgarides — Aye
Kretzmer — Aye
Mahler — Aye
°Gary Wycoff, Vice - Chairs
of the Planning Commission
of the City of El Segundo,
California
proj=tsW76499ka487Vmjutjm
194
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
INTER - DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
Meeting Date: October 28, 1999
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: James M. Hansen, Interim Director of Planning and Building Safety
THROUGH: Laurie B. Jester, Senior Planner 4
STAFF
PLANNER: Lauren Sprankle, Interim Planning Technician
SUBJECT: Envimnm... + -, A - _ - - - --
Address: 202 Illinois Street, #B ° °wuonat
Applicant: John Corrales, Grateful Dogs P.D.S., Inc.
Property Owner: Stanley Novak
REQUEST
94
The Planning Division has received a Conditional Use Permit application, pursuant to Section
20.74 of the Zoning Code, requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor dog
day care and overnight kennel operations at an existing dog day care facility.
RECOMMENDATION
Planning Staff recommends approval of Environmental Assessment EA -487 and Conditional Use
Permit 99 -3 for the operation of an outdoor dog day care and overnight kennel operations at the
existing facility, with conditions. The Planning Commission will take action on the outdoor dog
day care and will make a recommendation to the City Council on the overnight kennel
operations.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The project site is located in the Medium Manufacturing (MM) Zone. It is currently developed
with an indoor dog day care facility. The building is approximately 4,000 square feet, with six
suites for the proposed kennel use, and the remainder of the space is a play area for the dogs.
The approximately 1,000 square feet of outdoor play area in the rear of the site is paved and has
been covered with wood chips and mulch to provide cushioning for the dogs. This outdoor area
is enclosed on all sides and the minimum height of the surrounding fencing is six feet (d'). The
driveway on the southern side of the property can accommodate six vehicles and is utilized by
both the employees of the dog day care as well as for the loading and unloading of dogs by the
patrons.
A
201
195
SURROUNDING AREA CHARACTERISTICS
The properties surrounding the site to the north and west are located in the Medium
Manufacturing (MM)
Zone and the propert Zone. The property to the east is located in the General Commercial (C -3) m h i
y to the south is located in the Public Facilities (PF) Zone. Te site s
accessed by Franklin Avenue. The property to the north is occupied by Inte
ational Rectifier, a
research and development and light industrial facility, and the property to the south is the City's
Maintenance yard. To the east of the subject property is International Garden and Floral Design,
a nursery. Immediately to the west is ERI Intemational, a wholesale company. In general, the
surrounding area is light industrial uses.
Surrounding land uses are summarized as follows:
Land Use
North: Research and development, light industrial Zone
South: Maintenance yard MM
East: Nursery PF
West' Wholesale company C -3
MM
PRO. ECT DESCRIPTION
The existing indoor dog day care facility, as well as the proposed outdoor facility, operates from
8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., daily with two to'
employees on site. The building is approximately
4,000 square feet, with six suites for the proposed overnight kennel use, and the remainder of the
area is a play area for the dogs. The approximate 1,000 square feet of outdoor pixy area in the
rear of the site is paved and has been covered with wood chips and mulch to provide cushioning
for the dogs. The outdoor area is enclosed on all sides by a minimum six foot (6') high fence.
The indoor and outdoor use of the facility is proposed to be utilized by a maximum of 30 to 35
dogs at a time. (A maximum of 30 to 35 dogs would be on the site at any one time.) The
outdoor area of the facility is anticipated to be used on an as- needed basis, for approximately two
to three hours at a time, once or twice a day. For dogs that will be kept overnight in the kennel
facility, an additional outdoor "play time,, may be incorporated later in the evening, but the
outdoor operations are anticipated to cease by 8:00 or 9 :00 p.m.
The driveway on the southern side of the property can accommodate six vehicles and is utilized
by both the employees of the dog day care as well as for the loading and unloading of dogs by
the patrons. However, the majority of the dogs are picked up and dropped off in a company
vehicle and only 10 dogs per day, maximum, are picked up and dropped off at the site by the
owners. The new operations are not expected to generate additional clients on a daily basis. The
overnight kennel operations would have an average stay of four to five nights (including
weekends) and would be for a maximum of eight dogs at any one time. The overnight operations
would be supervised by a resident. manager and occasionally an additional employee, if needed,
and would incorporate outdoor use of the facility on a limited basis. A resident manager would
be permitted to stay in the facility overnight as "caretaker units" are permitted in Smoky Hollow.
232
2 1 46
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Initial Study was prepared by staff for the project which identified potential impacts related
to air, noise, land use, natural resources, risk of upset, and transportation/circulation for the
outdoor dog day care use and kennel (overnight stay) operations. Upon completion of this
Study, it was determined that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment,
and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts was prepared pursuant to the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /ANALYSIS
Pursuant to Administrative Determination AD 98_22, indoor dog day cares are permitted uses in
the Medium Manufacturing (MM), Small Business (SB), and Light Industrial (M -1) Zones.
Additionally, AD 98 -22 requires that outdoor dog day care requires approval of a Conditional
Use Permit by the Planning Commission. Furthermore, the Planning Comtission determined
that overnight boarding of four or more dogs and/or cats in conjunction with a dog day care
facility would be considered a kennel, and as such would require a Conditional Use Permit with
a recommendation by the Planning Commission and final action by the City Council.
The proposed project application requests approval for both outdoor dog day care and kennel
operations. Therefore, the Planning Commission will make a determination on whether or not
the outdoor dog day care will be permitted and a recommendation to the City Council as to
whether or not kennel operations (overnight boarding) should be permitted. The City Council
will make the final determination on the use of the site as a kennel.
Section 20.74.050 of the Zoning Code describes the purpose of a Conditional Use Permit. This
section of the code is as follows:
"The purpose of a conditional use permit shall be:
A. To assure the compatibility of the particular use on the particular site in
relationship to other existing and potential uses within the general area in which
the use is proposed to be located;
B. To assure the proposed use is consistent and compatible with the purpose of the
zone in which the site is located; and,
C. To recognize and compensate for potential impacts that could be generated by the
Proposed use, such as noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibration, odors, traffic and
hazards."
In accordance with Section 20.74.060 of the Zoning Code, the Planning Commission and City
Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit if all of the following three findings can be met:
3 203
197
A. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of
this title and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located (the MM Zone).
The use is consistent with the objectives of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the MM
Zone, provided approval of a CUP is obtained. The purpose of the MM Zone
provide the opportunity for industrial and manufacturing uses. Alth is to
ough the use is not
industrial or manufacturing, it is compatible with these types of uses. Additionally, this
project site is located in the Smoky Hollow area of the City, as defined by the General
Plan, which promotes a variety of land uses. The type of use proposed is relatively
unique in that there is a small number of this type of facility in the area.
B. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Because the site is currently operating as an indoor dog day care facility, expanding the
operations to include outdoor use and overnight boarding, would not be expected cause
any further impacts if the conditions of approval are met. These conditions of approval
are in regard to noise, animal waste, lighting, runoff to drains, and obtaining Anima
Control approval. Such conditions are expected to adequately address any concerns
related to health, safety, welfare, and injury to properties and improvements in the
vicinity of the facility. Additionally, the project as proposed will not increase the
maximum number of dogs using the facilities, and the operational characteristics will
ensure that there will not be impacts.
C. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions
of Chapter 20.74. By obtaining approval of the use of the site for outdoor dog day care
by the Planning Comttlission and approval for the kennel operations by the City Council
(with prior recommendation from the Planning Commission), the facility will operate in
compliance with the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code.
INTER - DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
The project application and initial study were circulated and all inter - depart mental comments are
attached to the report. The Recreation and Parks, Finance, Police, and Public Works
Departments, the Building Safety Division, the City Attorney's office, the City Manager's office,
and the Library Director concurred with the findings of the draft Initial Study and offered no
comments. The project will be required to pay the standard mitigation fees for police, library,
fire, and traffic. These fee requirements have been incorporated into the Resolution for the
project as conditions of approval.- As of the completion of this report, no comments have been
received from the public.
EXITS
A. Draft Planning Commission Resolution No. 2456
B. Inter - Departmental Comments
C. Initial Study and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts
D. Applications
4
]4�
Prepared by:
u en Sprankl ,
Interim Planning Technician
Reviewed by:
Laurie B. Jester,
Senior Planner
Approved by
James M. Hanse t,
Interim Director of Planning and
Building Safety; and,
Secretary to the Planning
Conutussion
projectcW764991o487W,ftreport
213.5
199
2OD 6
2 ^0
RESOLUTION NO. 2456 DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL,
ASSESSMENT EA -487 AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT CUP 99 -3 TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF
TO RECOMMENDING
DOG DAY CARE AND RECONDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE
OPERATION OF A KENNEL FACILITY AT 202 ILLINOIS
STREET; #B. PETITIONED BY: JOHN CORRALES,
GRATEFUL DOGS P.D.S., INC. PROPERTY OWNER:
STANLEY NOVAK.
WHEREAS, on June 10, 1999, an application was received from John Corrales of
Grateful Dogs P.D.S., Inc. requesting approval of an Environmental Assessment and Conditional
Use Permit in the Medium Manufacturing (MM) Zone to allow an outdoor dog day care and
kennel (overnight boarding) operations at an existing indoor dog day care facility;
WHEREAS, an inter - Departmental correspondence has been prepared and circulated
along with the application and initial study for the proposed use for inter - departmental
comments;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed Environmental Assessment EA-
487, Initial Study and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts, and the supporting
evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act,
State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No. 3805);
WHEREAS, on October 28, 1999, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to law, a
duly advertised public hearing on such matter and notice of the public hearing was given the
time, form, and manner prescribed by law;
WHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was given to all persons present to present
testimony or documentar y evidence for or against the findings of Environmental Assessment
EA -487 and Conditional Use Permit CUP 99 -3; and,
WHEREAS, at said hearing the following facts were established:
1 • The applicant is proposing to expand the existing use of the site as an indoor dog day care
facility to include outdoor dog day care and kennel (overnight boarding) operations.
2. The project site is an existing indoor dog day care comprised of approximately 4,000
square feet of indoor dog day care, including six (6) suites for the proposed kennel and
approximately 1,000 square feet of enclosed outdoor area for the proposed outdoor dog
day care. The site can accommodate approximately six (6) vehicles in the driveway.
20
DRAFT
3• The dog day care facility watches a maximum of 30 to 35 dogs per day, and proposes to
board a maximum of eight dogs per night. The hours of the operation for the day care are
from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m , daily. It is anticipated that the average length of stay for the
overnight kennel operations would be between four and five nights.
4. The outdoor area of the facility is anticipated to be used on an as- needed basis, for
approximately two to three hours at a time, once or twice a day. For dogs that will be
kept overnight in the kennel facility, an additional outdoor "play time,, may be
incorporated in the evening, but is anticipated to cease by 8:00 or 9:00 p.m.
5• The surrounding area is currently developed with a research and development and light
industrial company to the north, the City's Maintenance yard to the south, a nursery to
the east, and a wholesale company to the west.
NOW' THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after consideration of the above facts
Of proposed Environmental Assessment EA -487 and Conditional Use Permit CUP 99 -3, the
Planning Commission finds as follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
1• An Initial Study was prepared for the project which identified potential impacts on air,
noise, land use, natural resources, risk of upset, and transportation/circulation.
Completion of this study revealed that the proposed . project will not have a significant,
adverse effect on the environment. Pursuant to the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts
was prepared;
2. That when considering the whole record, there is no evidence that the project will have
the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the
wildlife depends, because the project is in a built -out urban environment; and,
3• That the Planning Commission hereby authorized the Interim Director of Planning and
Building Safety to file with the appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and
De Minimus finding pursuant to California Assembly Bill (AB) No. 3158 and the
California Code of Regulations. Within ten (10) days if this approval, the applicant shall
submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of $25.00 required by the County of Los Angeles,
for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of Determination of
Negative Declaration. As approved in AB No. 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA
will not be met and no vesting shall occur until this condition is met and the required
notices and fees are filed with the County.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1 That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the
Zoning Code and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located (the MM Zone).
q,c
4.
2
202
DRAFT
The use is consistent with the objectives of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the MM
Zone, provided approval of a CUP is obtained. The purpose of the MM Zone is to
provide the opportunity for industrial and manufacturing uses. Although the use is not
industrial or manufacturing, it is compatible with these types of uses. Additionally, the
project site is located within the Smoky Hollow area of the City, as defined by the
General Plan, which promotes a variety of land uses. The type of use proposed is
relatively unique in that there is a small number of this type of facility in the area.
?. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would
be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare,
or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Because the site is
currently operating as an indoor dog day care facility, expanding the operations to include
outdoor use and overnight boarding, would not be expected to cause any further impacts
if the conditions of approval are met. These conditions of approval are in regard to noise,
animal waste, lighting, runoff to drains, and obtaining Animal Control approval. Such
conditions are expected to adequately address any concerns related to health, safety,
welfare, and injury to properties and improvements in the vicinity of the facility.
Additionally, the project as proposed will not increase the maximum number of dogs
using the facilities, and the operational characteristics will ensure that there will not be
impacts.
3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of
Chapter 20.74. By obtaining approval of the use of the site for outdoor dog day care by
the Planning Commission and approval for the kennel operations by the City Council
(with prior recommendation from the Planning Commission), the facility will operate in
compliance with the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code.
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY
1 That the proposed use is consistent with the existing General Plan Land Use Designation
of Smoky Hollow Mixed Use.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
hereby approves Environmental Assessment EA487 and Conditional Use Permit CUP 99 -3 with
regard to the outdoor dog day care and recommends approval of EA -487 and CUP 99 -3 to the
City Council with regard to the operation of a kennel, subject to the following conditions:
i Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred to the Director
Of Planning and Building Safety for a determination regarding the need for Planning
Commission review and approval of the proposed modification.
2. All drains on -site shall be kept clear of debris, feces, wood chips, and mulch and no
additional runoff attributed to the outdoor use of the site for a dog day care shall be
generated.
3
203 209
DRAFT
3. Prior to issuance of a permit or a business license or within 30 days from the approval of
this project, whichever is sooner, a Lighting Plan, including a photometric study, shall be
submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. The exterior lighting plan
shall indicate that neighboring properties will not be effected by the use of outdoor
illumination. Lighting shall be installed per the approved plans prior to building permit
final, occupancy of the project, or within 60 days from the approval of this project,
whichever is sooner.
4. All feces shall be immediately picked up and disposed of in a sealed bag or container.
All areas shall be kept clean and odors controlled.
5. If complaints are received by neighboring properties with regard to noise generated on
the site, the operations of the facility shall be modified. Such modification may include,
but is not limited to, moving dogs indoors that bark excessively, limiting the number of
dogs outside at any one time, and limiting the length of time that the dogs are permitted
outside.
6. After final approval by the Planning Commission and City Council, the applicant shall
contact Animal Control to perform a site inspection and obtain the required licensing
from Animal Control. A copy of the approval from Animal Control shall be submitted to
the Planning Division prior to operation of the facility, issuance of a business license, or
within 30 days from the approval of the project, whichever is sooner.
7. Prior to the issuance of a permit or business license, or within 30 days from the approval
of this project, whichever is sooner, the applicant shall pay a one -time fire services
mitigation fee of fourteen (14) cents per gross square foot of building floor area and
outdoor play area.
8. Prior to the issuance of a permit or business license, or within 30 days from the approval
of this project, whichever is sooner, the applicant shall pay a one -time library services
mitigation fee of three (3) cents per gross square foot of building floor area and outdoor
play area.
9. Prior to the issuance of a permit or business license, or within 30 days from the approval
Of this project, whichever is sooner, the applicant shall pay a one -time police services
mitigation fee of eleven (11) cents per gross square foot of building floor area and
outdoor play area.
10. Prior to the issuance of a permit or business license, or within 30 days from the approval
Of this project, whichever is sooner, the applicant shall pay the required Traffic
Mitigation Fee as determined by the Public Works Director.
11. The applicant shall indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless the City, its elected and
actions, au es of action, proceedings, Or suits employees which challenge or attack the validity of
ii 4
204
DRAFT
the City's approval of Environmental Assessment EA-487 and Conditional Use Permit
CUP 99 -3.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that according to the El Segundo Municipal Code, the
Secretary of the Planning Commission shall mail a copy of this Resolution to the applicants at
the address shown on the application and to any other person requesting a copy. The decision of
the Planning Commission as set forth in this Resolution shall become final and effective ten (10)
calendar days after the date of the Planning Commission action unless within such ten (10)
calendar day period an appeal in writing is filed with the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 28th day of October 1999.
James M. Hansen, Interim Director
of Planning and Building Safety; and,
Secretary to the Planning Commission
VOTES
Crowley —
Wycoff —
Boulgarides —
Kretzmer —
Mahler —
Brian Crowley, Chairman
of the Planning Commission
of the City of El Segundo,
California
project%W76-49%e2 487Vmolutton
211
2ri5
E_ =:
Initial Study with all co
Planner, Lauren SPranklemments by Thursda October 15
questions on the ro' She ma be reached ate 4_ 1999 to the
P ject. nsion No. 401 if ou Project
DEPARTMENTAL FINDINGS: y have any
concur with draft Initial Study findings as submitted.
suDstantially concur with Initial Stud y findings s and re
added as described below.
quest additional language 9 ge be
request additional contact and information before
determination. See comments below.
we can make adequate
h
ave concems about project's potential environmental impact
and request an interdepartmental meeting before
as described below
COMMENTS- proceeding with review.
2 1 2
1 � f
and Application Date
wgecisW7&499%ft-4Mdc
2 0 G
Initial Study with all comments b
planner, Lauren Sprankle. She may Thursda October 15
questions on the Y be reached at extension No 14p9 If the Project
Project.
y have any
=tudY findings as submitted.
mltted.
substantially concur with Initial Study findings and request additional Ian
added as described below.
guage be
request additional contact and information before we
can make adequate
determination. See comments below.
have concerns about projects potential environmental impact as
and request an interdepartmental meeting before proceeding with
COMMENTS-
Reviewed by:
Sionat„ra' e�"- `s-- -�i
Encl.: Initial Stud MN Date
Study and Application
described below
review.
to /S /sS
PrCjW W7e.4gg%98- 487uac
213
9n7
Initial Study with all comments by Thursday. October 15 1999 to the project
planner, Lauren Sprankle. She may be reached at extension No. 401 if you have any
questions on the project.
DEPARTMENTAL FINDINGS:
concur with draft Initial Study findings as submitted.
substantially concur with Initial Study findings and request additional language be
added as described below.
request additional contact and information before we can make adequate
determination. See comments below.
have concerns about project's potential environmental impact as described below
and request an interdepartmental meeting before proceeding with review.
COMMENTS:
Reviewed by:
jo n std find Title �►
:ncl:: Initial Study and Application
L i f
Date
PrQ18M i79.499%9a-497YW
Initial Study with all comments by Thursday October is 1999 to the planner, Lauren Sprankle. She may be reached at extension No. 401 if you have any
questions on the project.
DEPARTMENTAL FINDINGS:
concur with draft Initial Study findings as submitted.
— substantially concur with Initial Study findings and request additional language be
added as described below.
request additional contact and information before we can make adequate
determination. See comments below.
have concerns about project's potential environmental impact as described below
and request an interdepartmental meeting before proceeding with review.
COM— MENTS:
Reviewed by:
Signature and
ancl.: Initial Study and Application
iv 4
Date
WqG M W76489W& 4BNdc
x
20'15
Initial Study with all comments b
planner, Lauren Sprankle. She ma y Thursda October 15
questions on the project. y be reached at extension No. 999 to the project
401 if you have any
DEPARTMENTAL FINDINGS:
Xconcur with draft Initial Study findings as submitted.
substantially concur with Initial Study findings and request additional Ian ua
added as described below.
' 9 ge be
request additional contact and information before
determination. See comments below. we
can make adequate
have concerns about project's potential environmental impact as described below
and request an interdepartmental meeting before proceeding with review.
COMMENTS-
Reviewed
by: Signature and Title
E =: Initial Study and Application
L 6 U
lot
Da e
aroiecm%47a499%00-e87udC
?10
Initial Study with all comments by Thursday. October 15 1999 to the project
planner, Lauren Sprankle. She may be reached at extension No. 401 if you have any
questions on the project.
DEPARTMENTAL FINDINGS:
concur with draft Initial Study findings as submitted.
substantially concur with Initial Study findings and request additional language be
added as described below.
request additional contact and information before we can make adequate
determination. See comments below.
have concerns about project's potential environmental impact as described below
and request an interdepartmental meeting before proceeding with review.
COMMENTS:
.f
Reviewed by:
Encl.: Initial Study and Application
Date
P GM%47"99W -QncJc
217
f
F:
Initial Study with all comments b 15 planner, Lauren Spran e. She may be rea hed atOextension No. 9-9 t you have any
questions on the project, l401 f the project
DEPARTMENTAL FINDINGS:
-!-----concur with draft Initial Study findings as submitted.
substantially concur with Initial Study findings and request additional language be
added as described below.
request additional contact and information before we can
make adequate
determination. See comments below.
have concerns about project's potential environmental impact as described below
and request an interdepartmental meeting before proceeding with
CO review.
M— M— E_NTS:
Reviewed by:
Signature ap ©CT�B�%� 199
Encl.: Initial Stud 14? ^9 S Date
Study and Application
PrOWW 4764W%9a.4MC,.
212 212
City o/ elSegunck
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
AND BUILDING SAFETY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
PROJECT No. EA -487, CUP 99 -3
BACKGROUND
350 Main Street
Ell Segundo, CA 90245
(310) 322 -4670
FAX (310) 322 -4167
www.elsegundo.org
1. Project Title: Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor d- da I care and kennel o orations
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of EI Seaundo 350 Main Street EI Seaundo CA
90245
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Lauren Sprankle, Interim Plannina Technician
(3101 322 -4670 extension No 401
4. Project Location: 202 Illinois Street
5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: John Corrales Grateful Di is P.D.S. Inc 202 Illinois
Street. #B. El Segundo, CA 90245
6. General Plan Designation: Smoky Hollow Mixed Use
7. Zoning: Medium Manufacturinn Imul
8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later
phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its
implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary)
The subject property, located in the Medium Manufacturing Zone, is currently developed with an
indoor dog day care facility. This is a permitted use in the zone. Operating an outdoor dog day
care and /or a kennel in the zone are uses that require approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
The Conditional Use Permit for the outdoor dog day care requires review and action by the
Planning Commission. The kennel use (overnight boarding) requires review and
recommendation by the Planning Commission and final action by the City Council.
Currently, the dog day care facility operates from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., daily with two to three
employees on site. The structure on site formerly accommodated a high tech company. The
building Is approximately 4,000 square feet, with six suites for the proposed kennel use, and the
remainder for a play area for the dogs. The approximately 1,000 square feet of paved area in
the rear of the site has been covered with wood chips and mulch to provide cushioning for the
dogs. The outdoor area is enclosed on all sides. The minimum height of the surrounding
fencing is six feet (6'). The indoor and outdoor use of the facility is proposed to be utilized by a
maximum of 30 to 35 dogs at a time. A maximum of 30 to 35 dogs would be on the site at any
one time. The outdoor area of the facility is anticipated to be used on an as needed basis, for
approximately two or three hours at a time, once or twice a day. If dogs will be kept overnight in
1
213 2 ;9
the kennel facility, an additional outdoor "play time" may be incorporated later in the evening,
but is anticipated to cease by 8:00 or 9:00 p.m. The driveway on the southern side of the
property can accommodate six vehicles and is utilized by both the employees of the dog day
care as well as for the loading and unloading of dogs by the patrons. The majority of the dogs
are picked up and dropped off in a company vehicle.
Planned operations for the site include extending the day care to include outdoor use and
kennel operations. The outdoor use would take place in a fenced -off portion of the lot and the
kennel operations would take place inside of the facility. The new operations are not expected
to generate additional clients on a daily basis. The overnight kennel operations would be for an
average stay of four to five nights (including weekends) and would be for a maximum of eight
dogs at any one time. The overnight operations would be supervised by a resident manager
and occasionally an additional employee, if needed, and would incorporate outdoor use of the
facility on a limited basis. A resident manager would be permitted to stay in the facility overnight
since "caretaker units" are permitted in Smoky Hollow.
The proposed project has been analyzed for its environmental impacts and a draft initial study
has been prepared pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). A Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts is proposed for this project pursuant
to Section 15070 of CEQA.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings)
The properties surrounding the site to the north and west are located in the MM Zone. The
property to the east is located in the C -3 Zone and the property to the south is located in the PF
Zone. The site is accessed by Franklin Avenue. The property to the north is occupied by
International Rectifier, a research and development and light industrial facility, and the property
to the south is the City's Maintenance yard. To the east of the subject property is International
Garden and Floral Design, a nursery. Immediately to the west is ERI International, a wholesale
company. In general, the surrounding area is light industrial uses. The nearest residential zone
is approximately 970 feet away to the north and the nearest school is approximately 1400 feet to
the northwest. There are no hospitals or day care facilities in the area.
The City of El Segundo is located in the Los Angeles urban area and is considered part of the
Airport/South Bay subregion. The City of El Segundo is situated between Los Angeles
International Airport to the north, the City of Los Angeles Hyperion Wastewater Treatment Plant
and Department of Water and Power Scattergood Generating Station and the Pacific re ti Ocean to
the west, the Chevron oil refinery and the City of Manhattan Beach to the south, and Del Aire (a
Los Angeles County island) and the City of Hawthorne to the east.
10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement.):
Planning Commission, City Council, Los Angeles County Animal Control
214
il. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below( X) would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that Is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following
pages.
III. DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this Initial Study of Environmental Impact, the Planning Commission of the City of El
Segundo finds the following:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed
to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potential significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately
analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed
by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to
be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because
all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisi re
ons or mitigation measures that a
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Jam M. an s e
ten Di ctor of Planning and Building Safety;
n I Secretary of the la
e nning Commission
City of EI Segundo
4y-6-ZIF y
Date
X
215
221
IV. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
�) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the
information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects
like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be
explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not
expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project - specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on -site, cumulative as
well as project - level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers
must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than
significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be
significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an
EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact."
The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less
than significant level (mitigation measures from Section 17, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross- referenced).
5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3) (d). In this case, a
brief discussion should identify the following:
(a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
(b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of
and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
(c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the
extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential
impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should,
where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals
contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should
normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in
whatever format is selected.
9) The analysis of each issue should identify: (a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each
question; and (b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
L 2 2
n t r,
Issues and Supporting Informatiu..
W
,.,any umnaye Scenic resources, Includi
trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
hinhwnv9
scenic resources, trees, rock outcroppings, or
3 of the City of EI Seaundn Nn mNinsa
°c) Substantially degrade the existing
character
significant Significant
Impact With
Mitigation
l, out not limited to
iithin a state scenic
stork buildings within a state
aired.
or quality of the site
and its surroundings will not
are
as the
Significant
Impact
located in a
create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the area? X
The facility currently has two outdoor lights on the rear of the property. These lights are focused onto the subject
property and are activated by motion sensors. Because the surrounding uses are light industrial with little or no
nighttime use, and also because the kennel operations are expected to have limited, if any outdoor use during the
night, it is not expected that any of the surrounding properties will be disturbed. Standard code requirements prohibit
off -site illumination and a li htin Ian will be required. No mitt ation is re uired.
AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland Would the project:
- * , „na „w v-nyue rarmiano or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to
the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California
Resources A enc to non -a ricultural use?
V;=— ilit is located in a built -out manufacturin zone. No farmland exists. No miti cation is re uired.
t with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act t? X
of EI Se undo has no sites zoned fora ricultural use. No mitt ation is re uired.
other changes in the existing environment which, due to their or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- X
ural use? re no a ricultural) zoned sites in the Cit of EI Se undo. No mitt cation is re uired.
3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or
ollulict control district may be relied ti on to make the followin determinations. Would the ro'ect:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality
plan?
- X
d the is wcateb within the regional non - attainment area as defined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Operations at the site will not contribute
ss�nificantly to the quality of the air in the area. No mitinatinn ie .e..,,,...
any air quality standard or
or
an
ne project is small scale and less intensive than other permitted uses f
development) and is not expected to negatively contribute to air quality.
c) Result in a cumuiahvely considerable net increase of any criteria
Pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an
releasing o
emissions cheex exceed ambient
quantitative thresholds for ozone
Drecurcnrsl9
The site is located in
area, but will not result in a net increase of any
or
5
f 223
Issues and Supporting Informatio..
Impacttwnt Signifttant Signifiant
Impact With Impact
Mitigation
cx ose sensitive receptors to substantial Pollutant concentrations?
Operations at the site will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants since this facility is not located in Dose proximity
to an area of sensitive rece tors. No mitigation is required.
Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
The expansion of the use at the site to permit outside dog day care and kennel stays will not cause an increase in
objectionable odors that will affect a substantial number of people. All waste in the form of dog feces is picked up
immediately and disposed of in a sealed trash container Nn mia �.*i.
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations,
or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
The site is in an urbanized area where no candidate, sensitive, or special
mitigation is re uired.
�) Have a substantially adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies,
regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S.
Wildlife Service?
The site is in an urbanized area where no ri arian habitat is known to exist. N
Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as
defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited
to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrolooical interrn tntinn nr n+kZ
nterfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with established native resident migratory
wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
The site is not known to contain anyM-19ratorY corridors or native wildlife nu
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological
reSOUrces such as a tree preSQrva"on pOIICY or Ordlnance�
There are no local olicies or ordinances regarding biolo ical resources affE
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Conservation Community Plan, other approved local, regional,
or state habitat conservation Ian?
This site is not affected by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan, a
other habitat conservation plan No mitiqation is renuireri
a) pause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical
resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
The project is not expected to produce significant impacts upon, or result
or prehistoric site building, structure, or object. No mitigation is re uired.
U) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resources pursuant to Section 15064.5?
The site and surrounding areas are fully urbanized and developed enviror
not necessa ,nor are reservation efforts. No mitt attar is required.
C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature?
No aleontolo ical resources or sites or unique geologic features are knov
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal
meteries?
human remains, bunal sites, or cemeteries are known to exist on site
2 - 6
species are known to exist.
un
KI
nny man, or
any historic
studies are
2 1E
Informatio..
Significant Significant
Impact With
Mitigation
Mupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on�tthe� most
recent Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence
of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
Significant
Impact
- • -•r -•
dev .,„a„r --e fauns are located near the City. This site is exposed to seismic risks just as other
elopments in the vicinity would be, should an earthquake occur along these faults. The effects are mitigated
because the structure complied with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) relating to seismic safety at the time it was
constructed. Compliance with the UBC reduces the impacts of fault rupture to below a level of significance. No
mitigation is required
ee aatverpotenttally active faults are located near the City. This site is exposed to seismic risks just as other
developments in the vicinity would be, should an earthquake occur along these faults. These effects are mitigated
because the structure complied with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) relating to seismic safety at the time it was
constructed. Compliance with the UBC reduces the impacts of ground shaking to below a level of significance. No
mitigation is required
i ne site is in a portion of the City susceptible to liquefaction during an earthquake, nonetheless, the effects are
mitigated because the facility complied with the applicable sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) relating to
seismic safety at the time it was constructed. Compliance with the UBC reduces the impacts of fault rupture or
ground shaking on the structure to below a level of significanci ii miHnnH ;_ ___..:
/Areas prone to landslides typically have steep slopes
geologic evidence of instability. As this site is rela
geologic or physical features exist on the site no
ult in substantial soil erosion or the loss of to soilmpa
proposed project does not involve cnnstntrtinn
or more), unstable rock or soil characteristics, or other
flat, developed with structures, and no known unique
e anticinatari rjn ..a.�.....:__ :_ __ -- .
excavation, or
Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-
or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or
collapse?
impacts are
No unique geologic or physical features exist on the site, and no construction activity that would cause the site tc
become unstable is antici ated. No miti ation is re uired.
(d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -a -B of the Uniform
Bu' Code (1994 , creatin substantial risks to life or property? X
The site is not located on expansive soil and does not pose substantial risks to life or property. No mitigation is
required.
(e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks
or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not X
available for the disiDosal of waste water?
The site does not contain septic tanks or other alternative waste water disposal systems. The facility is connected to
City sewer services. No mitt ation is re uired.
7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the ro ect:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the
routine tra1 131011 , use or dis osal of hazardous materials? X
No hazardous materials will be transported use dis used of on the site. No miti ation is re uired.
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the X
likely release of hazardous materials into the environment?
No hazardous materials are proposed to be used on the site, so none will be released into
mitigation is required. the environment. No
7
226
Issues and Supporting
r r-ma nazaraous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or
nronnnarl sehnnt9
IIIQ
or
or
oa tocama on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials
sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as
a result would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
This site has not been Included on a Itst of hazardous materials sites anc
the environment. No mitigation is required
For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a
Plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people
reSlfflnn nr wnr4inn in Iln....._.__. ___ _..
This project would not result In a safety hazard for
Significant
Impact
or residing in the
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project
area?
The project is not located in the vioinih, of n ., ._ :_._:_ ., ... ..
r
PIi
in an
expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, it
nvolving wildland fires, including where wildlands are
urbanized areas or where reeirfennnc ire
are no
to
The project will use the existing site as
waters or changes in the amount of c ,H
an
Significant Significant
With Impact
Mitigation
be of no hazard to the
area. No
not interfere with any emergency response or
iry or death
idjacent to
flands?
there is
not require any
b) Substantial) de rade PF "� " "a °aun is re
with groundwater recharge such tthatuthere swould tbe a net bdef deficit substantially
aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g.,
the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which
nprmitc hs„e he.....
or waste
or
3 risk of loss, injury, or death. No
X
not result In discharge into surface
e proposed project is in an existing building that currently has a minimal water usage. Permitting the proposed
project will not significantly increase the amount of water used and is not expected to deplete existing groundwater
levels. No miti ation is re uired.
C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of.the course of a stream or river, in a X
manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off.
cifc7
I he site is currently built out. No alteration to the existing structure or yard area is
excavation planned. The site is not located near a stream or river. Existing drainage
modified and no erosion on- or off -sire is Gvnnntn,I ni
, nor is any grading or
are not proposed to be
2 8 ��
Issues and
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off site
The site is currently built out. No alteration to the existing structure or
excavation planned. The site is not located near a stream or river. Exis
.....Jili..J J _ t•_ _ __
creme or contribute runoff which would exceed the capacity of existing
or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial
is
Proposed project is an
protect caw inerefore not sut
g) Place housing within a 101
Flood Hazard Boundary or
..� >, uu,n t.e�c I ran No Impact
Significant significant Significant
Impact With Impact
Mitigation
Into ara[ed
X
Ird area is proposed, nor is any grading or
g drainage patterns are not proposed to be
to the existing structure or yard area
nd type of runoff is not expected to ch
Sion of an existing use which does not
I Lidarade the water auali . No miti at
loodplain, as mapped on a federal
Insurance Rate Map or other flood
water
nor is any grading or
n a iu0 -year flood hazard area structures which would
a- direct flood flows? X
Accorcing to Exhibit PS -2 contained in the Safety Element of the City's General Plan, EI
flooding during a 100 -year storm since there are no dams or waterways Segundo is not at risk from
located near the City. Localized flooding
during periods of heavy rainfall may occur but this would be due to the inadequacy of stone drains, therefore, the risk
of flooding or other water related hazards on the Site is considered remote and no impacts are anticipated. No
niti ation is re uired.
i) Expose people or structures to a significant dsk of loss, injury or death
involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee X
or dam?
are no dams or levees located near the City, therefore no associated risk of loss, injury, or death as a
coding is expected. No miticiatinn c .o t,l.e r
Hccoroing to the Safety Element of the City's General Plan, the southwestern portion of the City along the coast an
adjacent portions of the City of Los Angeles to the nort h) are identified as seiche and tsunami hazard areas. However,
since the site is not located in these areas, no impacts due to these natural hazards are anticipated. As the site is
currently developed there will be no change in the risks associated with land subsidence, the potential for landslides,
or mudflows. No mitigation is required
9. LAND t1RF Brun nt w.
The operations of the outdoor dog day care and kennel on the site will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement
or an established community since the facility is located in an existing structure. No impacts are anticipated and no
mitigation is required
221
9 228
Issues and Supporting
Sigaifictax Si + + +an
gnifican Significant
Impact With Impact
Mitigation t
o) contact with an applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an
agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the X
general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating n environmental
effect? g
The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is Smo
Medium Manufacturing. Although outdoor dog day cares and kennels are not mentioned as ermitted uses, they are
kY Hollow Mixed Use and the Zoning for the project site is
permitted in this zone, subject to the approval of a Conditional Conditional Use Permit) of the EI Segundo M nicipal ode (ESMC)Scontainstproc procedures and standards tor review CUP's. The General Plan goals, objectives, and policies which relate to this project are from the Land Use Element
and the Economic Development Element. With regard to the Land Use Element, the following
Support this project: Policy LU1 -5.6, which requires that all development proposals comply with the City's d objective
Ordinance and CEQA; Objective LU5-4, which encourages the preservation and maintenance of laybalanced and
diversified industrial base. With regard to the Economic Development Element, the following
policies apply: Goals ED1 and ED2, Objectives ED1 -1 and ED2 -1, and Policies ED1 -1.1, ED1 -1,2, ED1 -2.1, and EDi-
2.2. These support the creation and maintenance of a diverse and strop goals, objectives; and
residents, as well as its business community. Conformance with the General Plan is a pofcyfi sueethatlis determined
at the discretion of the Planning Commission or the City Council if the decision is
review and recommendation by the Planning Commission and final action b
Municipal Codes incorporate many requirements which will help to mitt ate n pealed. Kennel uses require
y the City Council. The Zoning and
further mitigation is required . p 9 y potential General Plan conflicts. No
Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural
:ommunities conservation nt�
of value to the reeinn a.� v. `: t" mineral resource
ne site is fully developed and no new construction, grading, or excavation is proposed. Additionally no mineral
resources that may be of value to the region and residents of the state are known to exist on the site. No mitigation is
re uired.
Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other
land use Ian? X
No locally - important mineral resource recovery sites have been delineated in the General Pla S
_and Use Plan for the area. No mitt ation is
NOISE. Would the project result in: required n. pacific Plan, or other
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or
a licable standards of other a encies? X
Although some increase of noise level is expected for
surrounding
outside, the levels that are anticipated to be generated should not exceed the standards set forth in the noise
g properties due to the potential for dogs barking
ordinance. The General Plan describes "sensitive receptors" as residentially zoned areas, hospitals, schools, nursing
homes, hotels/motels, etc. No such uses are in close proximity to the site, so the impacts to such would be minimal.
The majority of the outdoor use and, consequently, the majority of the increased levels of noise would be between 8:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Although some occasional outdoor uses are anticipated in the evenings and at night when the
ambient noise level is the lowest and sound carries the furthest, such intermittent and short-term outdoor activities are
not expected to have a significant impact on the surrounding, mostly industrial uses. The El Segundo Municipal Code,
Chapter 9.06, provides noise standards and limitations. The proposed use will be required to comply with these
standard regulations. No further mitt ation is re uired.
')osure of persons to or nanararin _
vibration
L
any
10
noise
222
not
7
Issues and Supporting Informatio..
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient n,
vicinity above levels existing without the project'
Although an increase in noise level is anticipate
as the dogs will not be kept outside all day and
temporary or
Significant I nificant I Significant
P With Impact
Mitigation
the
ute project, mis level is not expected to he —a permanent increase
will not be constantly barking. The operations will be required to
andards. No mitigation is rnni,irml
L;urrently, the dogs are kept inside the facility with the exception of transporting them to and from waiting vehicles.
With approval of this project, the dog day care will be permitted to operate outdoors, and it is expected that periodically
the ambient noise level on surrounding properties will increase when the dogs are barking. Such increase is expected
to be less than significant however, since it will be sporadic and surrounding facilities (such as the City's maintenance
and tend to enerate more noise than this facili is ex cted to. No miti ation is re wired.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or, where such a
PI has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public X
use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the
oroiert aroa to ��,.....,.__ �_.._,_..
nnttuugn in close proximity to the Los Angeles International Airport , noise levels at the site associated with the airport
are minimal. The proposed project will not cause employees at the site to be exposed to excessive noise levels
related to the air ort. No mitigation is re uired.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project
expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive X
noise levels?
No dvate airstri s are located in the vicinit of the ro'ect. No mitigation is required.
t2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for X
example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
:I-
1 he proposed project does not involve constructing new homes or businesses, nor does it involve the extension or
roadways, utilities, etc. The project is the expansion of an existing business that offers a service to the community,
with no im act on housing. No Mitigation is re uired.
Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the
construction of re lacement housin elsewhere? X
The project is the expansion of an existing business.
dis laced. No No new construction is proposed and no housing will be
miti ation is re uired.
Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction
of replacement housing elsewhere? X
The proposed project a located on a built out site that does not contain any housing. Therefore, no people are
expected to be displaced and no new housing needs to be constructed as a result of approval of this project. No
miti anon is re uired.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision
of new or physically altered govemment facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other pertormance objectives for anv of iho nt ttir..
at the site will have no impact upon or
Operations at the site will have no impact upon or result in
-..-- - - .
No impacts to schools are anticipated due to the use
lani'ircrl
11
to neeo Tor new or altered fire protection services. No
X
need lur new or anered police protection services. No
site as a dog day care and kennel. No mitigation is
a cog day care and kennel. No miti ation is re u red.
223 230
Issues and
M
to
are
Significant significant
Impact With
Mitigation
to the use of the site as a
woulo the project increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelarated?
significant
Impact
care
uemangs on parks and recreational facilities are primarily generated by permanent residential populations and the
project is not expected to alter the existing residential population since no residential development is proposed.
Operation of a dog day care and kennel on the site will not generate a demand for additional neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities since the facility's operations are expanding and no increase in population is
expected in association with this ex ansion. No miti ation is re required.
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
-T-T-7--
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an X
adverse physical effect on the environment?
No recreational facilities are proposed to be constructed
No mitigation is required. or expanded in conjunction with the approval of this proiect.
a) cause an increase in the traffic which is substantial in relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a X
substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections ?
The majority of the dogs that are cared for at the facility are picked up by a company vehicle and delivered to the site.
Approximately 10 dogs per day, maximum, may be picked up and dropped off at the site by the owners. No
substantial increase is traffic is antici ated with the ex ansion of o erations. No miti ation is re uired.
Rxceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard
:stablished by the county congestion management agency for X
desi Hated roads or hi hwa s?
The amount of traffic associated with the project is minimal, therefore the levels of service on surrounding roads is not
ex fitted to than e. No miti ation is re uired.
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in
traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety X
risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)?
The proposed pro)ect is located in an existing facility and will not chang
ncompatible uses. No mitigation is required
e) Result in inade uat eemer enc access?
Emergency access to the site will not be changed No mitigation is regut
f Result in inadequate parking capacity 1
The proposed proiect will utilize the rear yard and will not impact requrec
g) Contlict with adopted policies or programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts bicycle racks)?
No policies or programs supporting alternative transportation are in effe(
association with the project No mitigation is renuirorl
treatment
-- - -• -•� v,-amu un cane site would be minimal. No-
b) Require or result in construction of new water or wastewater treatment
- ilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which
uld cause significant environmental effects?
Very little water is utilized and very little wastewater is generated on the
facilities should be required as a result of this nrniaM r i
12
231
U
of the roadway or
so no
such, no new or expanded treatment
2P
rksuesnd Supporting Iliformatiu,. Poterali than
Signirli t Si tficant 7Sti91,TfiC',ni
Sn Impact With
Mitigation
I require or result in the construction of new stone water drainage
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental effects?
The facility is an existing structure and no new construction or grading is proposed. Therefore, no new or
storm water drains a facilities would be needed. No miti ation is re uired.
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded
entitlements needed?
Existing entitlements and resources are sufficient for the proposed project's water requirements. No new or
entitlements are needed. No miti ation is re uired.
Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which
services or may serve the project determined that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the
provider' existing commitments?
The proposed project involves a minor expansion in the use of the site and should only generate sligl
wastewater on a daily basis. No mitigation is required.
Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
more
i ne solid waste generated on -site is minimal, and is limited to dog feces and some trash. The majority of the solid
waste generated on -site is diverted from landfills through a recycling program which includes plastics, aluminum,
bottles, mulch, and wood chips No mitigation is required-
, state, and local statues
of
to
noes the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat e a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant , r animal, e
eliminate important examples of the major periods of California of
or prehistory?
ne protect is located on a developed site where no fish or wildlife population:
exam les of ma or eriods of California history or rehisto exist on the site. Nc
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that
the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of the past projects, the effects of other
current ro'ects, and the effects of robable future ro ects )?
The project is an expansion of an existing use and is not expected to have any
or cumulatively No miti ation is re uired.
c) Does the project have environmental. effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, ,either directly or
indirectly?
The project
to contribute any
eo or otherwise) exist.
is renuirrari
X
cause
p:lpr0jatcv376499MaA87\initial study
13 23 2
2 25
he Applicant:
Name
,heCk On
.vner
operty Owner:
ni _
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
AND BUILDING SAFETY
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 9QY45
FAX (31) 67
APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
C.U.P. No
Date: June 8, 99
G -Dogs, P.D.S., Inc. 202 Illinois Street #B El Segundo, g"ndO' - 90245
Phone
310- 364 -0011
Lessee S
Agent
Ml- Stanley Novak Post Office Rnv It
Address -- `j Jegundo, 90245 310- 322 -20
P e rh'Situatedat: See Attached Phone
(Exact legal description. F rovide attachment If necessary)
feral
anon: 202 Illinois
Address and Street, Avenue between Franklin Avenue
and Grand Avenue
ting Zoning: MM- Medium Street, Avenue
Jest: Under the provisions of Title 20, Chapter 20.74 of the Municipal Code, application for consideration of
Iditional Use Permit for the above described pro e
Describe in detail the enti re proposed ro'ect
bank, general office, industrial, restaurant, etc.) buildings and other equipment necessary to the project
1 type of construction, ;;a,,
aterials to be use, uses involved, i.e.,
No construction to be done. to currently have a e
at 202 Illinois Street. e. are applying for outdoor dt for indoor do
lot. The only materials used is g play at our on-site parking
cushion for the dogs, natural and environmentally safe mulch to
provide
TDescribe the existing development on the site. Include square footages and uses of each building on the
hee existing development is an e
shaped parking lot on our leased�ty (approximate) 1,000 square foot triangular
property.
1 �6
C [. J
3. Explain in detail why this particular site fs especially Sulted for the ..r.t }
Not applicable. No development planned. proP�sed development
i
4• Describe how the proposed project relates to the development of adjacent properties and the immediate
surrounding area and will not have detrimental effects to the adjacent properties or neighborhood.
We will have approximately 20 -35 clients per day, (as stated on our current permit).
Traffic will be minimal. Only 50% of the dogs will be dropped-off
between lam to gam and e )
Picked-up in the evening P7pm. a the morning
is picked -up by our co g from Spm to 7pm. The other SOZ
this procedure. ��y' There is a six car driveway to adequately facilitate
Currently, we have had no noise complaints. Our neighbors probably create more
noise than us. We are pro- actively petitioning our neighbors tb assist in this
F�rovddie an es�im'Fe B ? =ii0&Y0c`%?8f materials and construction of the proposed project
No construction to be done. $0.00 cost.
OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT
John R. Corrales
IN till of the property involved in this being duly sworn depose and say that I/We am the
elation of the City of EI Segundo with respect to an and �e have familiarized pelf (ourselves) with the rules and
tained and the information on documents and all plans attached hereto are in all respef l respects fi foregoing to the �lsb s�
our knowledge and belief. of
TE OF CALIFORNIA, )
ity of Los Angeles )ss.
i this day of
:Ountyand State, personally:
e name
e executed the same.
ESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
19
Date
19_ . before me, the undersigned Notary public in and for
sub scribe to the within instrument, and ackno ledgeed toeme that
Notary Public In and for said County and State
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
authorize John R. Corrales to act for me /u 11 matters relevant to this application. I understand that this
I be the :Orrsa'les v ontaon and w' a nt all infomtation and correspondence.
Signature
Dusan E. and Debr
r 227 234
I. We John R. Cozrales AGENT AFFIDAVIT
SENT of the property involved in this application and that Uwe have being duul d mm depose and sa
gulation of the City of El Segundo with respect to preparing P y that lMle am tt..
contained and the information on documents and all plans, atta hied hereto are ' myself (ourselves) with the rules and
9 application and that the foregoing statements herein
my /our knowledge and belief.
_ r �t all respects true and correct to the best of
// A
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
County of Los Angeles )ss.
19�
said Cohun r o —� day of J ., u r. 19 9
ty and State, personally appeared H., Z before me, the undersigned Notary public in and for
whose name S
he/she executed the same. �~�
subscribe to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that
WITNESS my hand and '
2 u.C..a�'nY�loni llQy2lp n 11
�YRtic- r.�1110
6 �"M.auu ` Notary public and for sa d Coun
"eie'®•'� ty and State
'rocedures for filing application
File a
pplication properly completed in the office of the Planning Division. Signature of the owner, owners, leesee,
and/or agent shall be notarized before a Notary Public.
Applicant shall provide all information, drawings and other materials as requested by the
Pay filing fee. Planning Division.
Applicant and affected property owners will be notified of time of hearing.
Applicant must be present at the hearing and may offer additional evidence to su
There shall be an additional fee for filin 9 � appeal PPort his/her request
.
ning Staff: Date received
Signature r
v -
23J
E.A. l' ?l
CUPAPP
228
c^
Z
H
m
O
E
C
Z
4]
N
'
y N
r3
P
c7
N
H
m
N
v
O H
�
G
h
F C
U
O
H
C
¢ C
U7 O L.
C
2L N N p
Y
C
G N rt �p
�
G
_
-60•eeZ
Z
/ idS
J
/ O
6
S p O
H
L
p0S-----------------�
H
O
Z
H
w:
J
O H
N
O
N
a
COOL
Z
m
E
C
4]
N
'
y N
Q�
m
c7
m 3
m
N
O H
O
F C
O
H
U
-60•eeZ
Z
/ idS
J
/ O
6
S p O
H
L
p0S-----------------�
H
O
Z
H
w:
J
O H
N
O
N
a
COOL
�obL
229
O
N
.SZ
N
I
}
OC
r
4
K
2361
�i
C
N
'
N
Q�
m
�obL
229
O
N
.SZ
N
I
}
OC
r
4
K
2361
C�, Jf dvaC . � -� =rte t e : Sz, ,tee{ \
S1u.de� e4-- ', �f oti;TS,v2�
x
V.0 icl� urn cVL P cz
t4W5
1
2 �0
t
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
AND BUILDING SAFETY
INITIAL STUDY
APPLICANT QUESTIONNAIRE
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name, address and hone number of current roe Mr. Stanley Novak
P P P rty owns
Office Box 125. 17.1 cos.., a nA .,,..,, .
(Note: Property Owner's signature Is required on Page 6 and 7)
2 Address ofproject 202 Illinois Street, El Segundo, CA
Assessor's Block and Lot No.: 4139 - 006 -079
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
(310) 322 -4670
FAX (310) 322 -4167
3. Name, address, and telephone number of applicant, including name of person to be contacted concerning this project
(if different from Property Owner): John Corrales 202 n i i t c
90243, 310- 364 -001, Ldo. CA
(Note: Applicant's signature is required on Page 7)
4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required
by city, regional, state, and federal agencies: Not applicable
5. E:dsting zoning district _
6. Proposed use of site (project for which this form is filed): We are applvin¢ for outdoo
play use at our on –site parking lot. r do¢
PROJECT OFCroreT ON Use additional sheets as necessary.
Site size: Anprex�marely 1 000 ,a a f t
parking lot
?• Total square footage of bwlding(s) orstruenrre(s): No building or structure
3. Number of floors of construction: None
4. Amount of on-site parking provided: ,.,r ,r {
5• Proposed scheduling: July 1999 or as soongas
possible
6. Associated projects and relationship to larger project or series of projects: Not applicable
7• If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale price or rents, and
type of household size expected. Not applicable
If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of building area, and
nature of loading facilities provided Not applicable'
Project No. EA �' —L_
1
1)
'.04
238
9• If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and nature of loading faciWes.
Not applicable
10. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, nature of loading
facilities provided and community benefit to be derived from the project.
Not applicable.
11. If the project requires a variance, conditional use permit or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why
the application is required. Conditional Use Permit is required, because current
zoning and use does not specify that an outdoor dog play area has been
approved.
Y
ENVIRONMEU'rnt SEMNr
1 • Describe the Project site as it exists before the Project, including information on topography,
animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any exfstirt
the structures. Attach ph structures on the site, and the use of
otographs g st soil stability, Plant and
of the site. Snapshots orpoiaroid photos will be accepted.
Before the project the project site was a cement parking lot. Proposed use
has natural and environmentally safe mulch on the
cushion for the dogs. cement to provide for
2. Describe the surrounding Properties, including the t information an plants and animals and any culWral. historical or
scenic aspects. Indicate type of land use (residential, commercial, eta,), Intently of lend use (one -famly
apartment houses, shops, deparunent stores, eta), and scale of development (h
etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos wilt be accepted
eight frontage, setback Tsar yard,
See photographs,
ENVIRO %VZ1MA-'JMEAM Brief explanations of all answers are required on attached sheets, or refer to previous
responses to Items B and C above,
Not applicable.
Land Use Planning. Would the proposal: YES MAYBE NO
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
the project? x
Policies adopted by age environmental
with jurisdiction over
Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? ./
239
z
232
/~ I
j
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)?
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (include a low-income or
minority community)?
Population and Housing. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
C) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing?
Geologic Problems. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture?
b) Seismic ground shaking?
C) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d) Sekche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
_) Landslides ormudnows?
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or ill?
g) Subsidence of the land?
h) Expansive soils?
i) Unique geologic or physical features?
Water. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding?
C) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements?
f) Change in the quality of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifier by cuts or excavations,
or through substantial loss of groundwater
recharge capacW
g) Altered direction or rate of now of groundwater?
3
YES MAYBE NO
- )C
Y
- X
X
X
A
240
233
7
6.
h) Impacts to groundwater quality?
7 Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public wale,
supplies?
5• Air Quality. Would the proposal:
a) _ Violate any air quality standard or contribute to at
existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
C) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature , or
cause any changes in climate?
d) Create objectionable odors?
6. Transportatlon/Circulation. Would the proposai result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
C) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parting capacity on -site or off -sit &?
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
9) Re", waterbome or air traffic impacts?
Biological Resources. Would the proposal result in
impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to, plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)?
C) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal
pool)?
a) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
Energy and Mineral Resources Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b) Use non - renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manners
C) Result In the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State?
� r
L �•k i
YES MAYBE
NO
_X_
— X
- x
234
9. Hazards. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
C) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazani7
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
Potential health hazards?
a) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees?
f 0. Noise. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
T 7. Public Services. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
C) Schools?
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
e) Other governmental services?
?• Utilities and Service systems. Would the proposal result
in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas?
b) Communications systems?
C) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
e) Storm water drainage?
0 Solid waste disposal?
g) Local or regional water supplies?
Aesthetics. Would the proposal.
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
C) Create light or glare?
Cultural Resources. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resouroe37
b) Disturb archasologieal resounxs7
YES MAYBE
NG
X
J
Y
_X
-- X
-)L 242
- 4 235
is.
16.
H
C) Affect historical resources? YES MAYBE
NO
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change x
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X
e) Restrict e)dsdng religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area? X
Recreation. Would the Proposal
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
a) Affect erdsting
regional parks or other recreational facilities? )(
recreational opportunities?
Mandatory Findings of Significance
a) Does the Project have the Potential to degrade the _
quality of the environment, plant or
range reduce u
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
fish or wildlife population to or cause a
p below self -
sustaining levels, threaten to elleliminate a
animal community, reduce the number a restrict
the nge of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major
Periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the Potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage environmental goals? 4e of long -term, AL
c) Does
re m ed
cronsrdertble7 C,butcumulatiyely
umulatiely
considerable -
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in conjunction with
cove
the effns ects of past Projects, the effects of other
projects,) protects
Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or Indirectly?
-�)(JSa)�A, Gf ,rrolt6 ova
4 I _ OWN S AFFIDAVIT
:lion; I (we) have familiarized myself 1~L am -
�g this application; and the information n all documents anld an plans i regulation of the C
P �e and coi
24.1
Of the Property involved In this
,undo with respect to preparing
Be of my (our) knowledge and
(0'/0-1191
Date
236
ereby authorized John R. Corrales OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION
at thia person will be the primary contact on the to act for me in all
project and will be sent all trfMv....
to this aPPGcaffon. I understanc
mdenca_
IV' q
Date
APPLICANT AFFIDAVIT
'e) --Dogs, P.D.S. Inc /Susan Corrales and Debra baler
acing and riling this have is application; and the information on all d cu iAdofi lall plans la (are) the APPLICANT S
( () of the Property
ledge and belief. l�tIO^ of ty of re Segundo with f m (o moved m
P � � e d correct to the best of my (our)
s • na
c�..__..._ 0
as of Plans
ification Map
° verty Owner Labels
dopes with Postage
Supplemental into Sheets
W97
A r'"NNING DIVISION USE ONLY
Fee/Deposft Received $ .�S a()
Date Filed. 6 /°
Received Sy:
r-
a31
CALIFORNIA ALL- PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of Califomia
County of _LAg 4 >_ } ss.
On 14SC J
a1T— , before me, [�,.,� q , Q
Nan. ab,2a of aka, t. .a. •J.. OO.. �' L•1L
personally appeared �£3r,. �, p = _ t, _ N0b
abWA.MA
carerw +a tlmao
�yRtle— Co9rarro _
BOMs i122L2000
Pay ,p ,S"AE
Opersonally known to me
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
to be the Person(s) whose name(s) spare
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/5)1e/they executed
the same in hte /hbdtheir authorized
capacity(ies), and that by r
/►wr /thei
signature(s) on the instrument the person(/), t
the entity upon behalf of which the persons)
acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
C. w.--
5410.. a NOfvy playa
Though the rnrormadon berow is not OPTIONAL
and could prevent haudOrerW l~ by law, d may Wove valuable to persons
va/ and martachrnent Ofth /s lb m to a � np on N t document
Description of Attached Document
Title Title or Type Of Document —. A'D 7L 1 ,• „ _ , _ _ _
Document Date:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies)
Signer's Name:
❑ Individual
❑
Corporate Of
❑
Partner —❑
❑
Attorney in Fi
❑
Trustee
❑
Guardian or C
O
Other.
Signer Is Represe
0 1987 Nni
....em • 0350 M Sob Aw.. P.O. erns 2402 •_ —��
aa* —IIL CA 913112402
245
Pmy Nw 5807 Ftm~ CY T15-Fm 14004MOM
DATE
July 28, 1999 429ft
~
TO. Ms. Lauren A
Interim Planning Technician Jlti`J��'�3',,3. °lf
FROM: John Corrales
RE: KENNEL USE AT THE GRATEFUL DOGS DOG DAY
CARE CLUBHOUSE
We appreciate your consideration of this matter. The following is. our
addendum to the conditional use permit application.
Describe in detail the entire proposed project and other equipment
necessary to the project.
The purpose of the kennel is
clients. to offer overnight services to our
On property we have six oversized suites to be used se suites
The
are larger than typical kennels. The maximum number a dogs
during one overnight would be eight dogs. Three of the suites are
larger than the other three and would be able to house up to two
dogs, especially, if the dogs are from the same owner.
There is no new construction. Prior use of this building was for a
high tech company. The suites were formerly offices and we
renovated it from carpeting to linoleum floors for easy clean -up and
hygiene. Also, the artwork in each suite is well- appointed to provide
for an enjoyable atmosphere. Hence, we are able to offer an inviting
and personalized environment for our clients.
Average length of stay would be 4-5 nights and will be open for
weekend operation. A resident manager will stay on property at all
times when our dog clients are inhouse. Both partners, Debra Axler,
Susan Corrales and myself are on cell phones 24 hours a day and 36S
days of the year to assist with all situations. We have great
relationships with the local veterinarian hospitals and are prepared
to respond. Also, it is important to note that both partner live
4 miles of the clubhouse. within
246
r
t
The following are the additional explanations required for the Initial
Study Applicant Questionnaire Section D.
1. Land Use Planning.
a) No, it does not relate to the general plan designation or zoning.
b) No, there is no conflict with environmental plans, because it
does not effect air quality, general appeal, etc. It is a very
simple project.
c) No, it is actually compatible, because the neighboring
businesses are larger in size and usually louder than we are.
d) No, it does not effect soils, because there is cement below the
mulch.
e) No, the project complements the community, because it offers a
family type of service to local businesses and there is no
construction that changes the physical arrangement.
2. Population and Housing.
a) No, the project does not add to the local population, because it
is only a business that offers a service to the current
community.
b) No, the growth would be limited to a small amount of our
clients. 30 -35 dogs maximum at one time.
C) No, this project has nothing to do with housing.
�.
L`k
2 4 G
I Geologic Problems.
a) No, this project does not involve ground excavation or
construction.
b) No, this project does not involve construction.
c) No, only mulch and wood chips are placed on top of cement to
allow for cushion for the dogs.
d) No, this project has nothing to do with seiche, tsunami or
volcanic hazard.
e) No, because we are not located on a hill or an incline that would
cause this.
f) No, the project does not involve excavation but rather adding
mulch and wood chips on top of cement
g) No, the water usage is very minimal.
h) No, the mulch and wood chips are not in contact with soil.
0 No, there is nothing unique that would apply to any geologic
problems.
4) Water.
a) No, water use is very minimal. For example, our water bill for
June was approximately $73.
b) No, we are utilizing train trestles to keep the mulch and wood
chips in its place and to prevent it from covering drainage
areas.
c) No, water use is very minimal.
d) No, there are no bodies of water near the project to be effected.
e) No, water use is very minimal.
?41 248
f) No, water use is very minimal and does not involve
withdrawals or interceptions.
g) No, water use is very minimal.
h) No, water use is very minimal.
i) No, water use is very minimal.
5. Air Quality.
a) No, the project does not involve industrial or construction
materials that would add to an air quality violation.
b) No, there are no pollutants involved
C) No, our project is too small and has nothing to do with air
movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any changes in
climate.
d) No, our project is too small to create objectionable odors. The
concentration of dogs at the day care is less than 1% of the tota
concentration of dogs in El Segundo. The dog fec l
es is picked to
immediately.
6. Transportation/Circulation
a) No, the dogs are mainly picked up by the company and the
dogs are usually not delivered to the day care. There may be
10 dogs dropped off and picked -up at maximum on a daily
basis.
b) there are no
bec dangerous designs added by the proposal,
because the only design being added is mulch and wood chips.
C) No, no is being changed to any access patterns.
d) No, there are rarely more than 5 cars at the day care site at
any one moment in time.
29 242
F'
r'
e) No, the project is not next to easements or public walkways or
streets.
fl No, the project has nothing to do with and is not near
alternative transportation.
g) No, there is very minimal traffic in and out of the business.
7. Biological Resources.
a) No, there is no relation to endangered or threatened species
with our business.
b) No, we are not in contact with heritage trees.
C) No, because we are in the middle of a man -made medium
industrial community.
d) No, there are no wetland habitats in the immediate area.
e) No, there are no wildlife dispersal or migration corridors in the
immediate area.
8. Energy and Mineral Resources.
a) No, our enery usage is very minimal.
b) No, we even recycle plastics, aluminums, bottles, mulch and
wood chips.
C) No, the project does not involve mineral resources.
9. Hazards.
a) No, hazardous substances are not used.
b) No, the project does not involve a change or interference with
emergency plans.
250
243
r
C) No, the project is much like a public dog park, except that it is a
Private business with less dogs. The concentration of dogs are
less than most dog parks.
d) No, there are no related hazards by exposing our business to
people. Ali of the dog owners are interviewed for their dog's
health reports and good social behavior capabilities.
e) Maybe, but the area is very small and there is nothing
flammable in the immediate surrounding area. The mulch and
wood chip area is surrounded by cement walls and pavement.
10. Noise.
a) Maybe, but the noise level is very minimal. It may be typical
to have one or two dogs barking at once, but it is very atypical
to have more than two dogs barking at once. The city
maintenance yard is next door to us and is continually louder
than we are.
b) No, the noise level of dogs barking is very minimal
11. Public Services.
a) No, additional fire protection is not necessary.
b) No, additional police protection is not necessary.
c) No, the dog business does not relate to schools.
d) No, the impact on public facilities is minimal.
e) No, the project does not involve any change or addition in
governmental services.
12. Utilities and Service Systems.
a) No, the project does not utilize natural gas or power.
b) No, the project does not utilize communications systems.
25 ���
s
C) No, the project does not involve water treatment or distribution
facilities.
d) No, water usage is very minimal and toxic chemicals are not
used.
e) No, because we have laid wain trestles to contain the mulch
and wood chips, the storm water drain is very well protected.
f) No, solid waste is limited to dog feces which is very minimal.
g) No, water usage is very minimal.
13. Aesthetics.
a) No, we are located in a medium industrial zone.
b) No, we are located in a medium industrial zone.
c) No, there are no reflective or light producing constructions to
be used.
14. Cultural Resources.
a) No, we are not aware of this.
b) No, we would be surprised to find that there are archaelogic
al
resources on -site.
C) No, we are not aware of this.
d) No, there is nothing in the area to indicate this.
e) No, there is nothing in the area to indicate this.
15. Recreation.
a) No, we are responding to the demand for a private day care
with outdoor use.
252
" X45
b) No, we only enhance dog owner recreational activities. It is a
fun environment.
16. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a) No, we are not aware of this.
b) No, this project does not directly effect the environment
C) No, we are not aware that there would be considerable impact.
d) No, the project does not directly or indirectly effect human
beings.
2 J^ ?4
MEMORANDUM
DATE. August 10, 1999
TO' Ms. Lauren Sprankle, Interim Planning Technician
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND
BUILDING SAFETY
FROM: John Corrales
GRATEFUL DOGS
RE: RESPONSE TO MEMORANDUM JULY 12, 1999/
CUP 99 -3 QUESTION NO. 5
Dear Ms. Sprankle,
We appreciate your assistance and time.
The following is our description to your request for description of the
surrounding properties to include the type of land use.
To the immediate north of our property is the parking lot of International
Rectifier. The company is a manufacturer of rectifiers.
To the east of our properly is a nursery, International Garden & Floral
Design. There is a 100 foot wide strip of dirt lot that separates our property
from the actual nursery.
To the south of our property is the City of El Segundo Maintenance yard.
To the west of the property is ERI International, who is also a tenant of our
landlord, Mr. Stanley Novak. ERI International is a wholesale tropical
company.
The above properties are located in the MM- Medium zone.
Lauren, please advise if you need further information.
At your servicce,
v /
AUG I 1 1999
j, P171
�� 254
��A�
Electrical Distribution System Upgrade (Chevicentral) and adopt Resolution DRAFT
2457 as modified to 13.2 kV in the appropriate sections and remove under
Section 1d the sentence "thereby adding 60 MVA to the refinery's power grid." PUBLIC HEARINGS
Commissioner Mahler seconded. Passed 4-0. NEW BUSINESS
Vice -Chair Wycoff presented Environmental Assessment EA -487 and EA-487
Conditional Use Permit CUP 99 -3 — Overnight Kennel Operations and Outdoor
Dog Day Care. Address: 202 Illinois Street, #B. Applicant and Property
Owners: John Corrales, Grateful Dogs P.D.S., Inc. (Mr. Stanley Novak).
Interim Planning Technician Lauren Sprankle summarized the staff report as
outlined in the Agenda Packet.
Vice -Chair Wycoff opened the public hearing.
John Corrales, Managing Partner, Grateful Dogs P.D.S. Inc.
He stated they appreciate the Commission's consideration of this
complementary type of use at their daycare. He said their business grew from
a dog walking service. By popular demand, they opened up a doggie daycare
based upon their clients' requests and the CUP will allow their business to
meet their clients' needs for outdoor playtime and overnight kenneling. He
said the outdoor playtime is part of the playful environment offered to the
clients. He pointed out that the business serves the entire South Bay.
Vice -Chair Wycoff asked how they are accommodating doggie playtime
currently. Mr. Corrales stated currently they are indoors and when dogs do
need to be outdoors, they still have the dog walking service.
Commissioner Mahler expressed concern with the noise and questioned how
many dogs are proposed to be outdoors at playtime. Mr. Corrales stated that
on site, there are proposed to be 30 -35 at a time. The dogs go through a very
selective screening and interview process.
Debra Axler, Grateful Dogs P.D.S., Inc.
She stated they use collars that spray a harmless mist of citronella to stop the
dogs that are barking. She further stated there is no one around their facility
that would be affected by noise with the closest resident being a quarter of a
mile away. Mr. Corrales also stated they are next door to the City maintenance
yard, which is very noisy.
Commissioner Boulgarides asked how long their business has been in
existence. Mr. Corrales stated the business has been open for close to two
years, but the daycare recently opened in May. He further added that they
have been reinvesting to make the facilities entirely doggie proof and a safe
type of environment.
Commissioner Kretzmer asked if the business is subject to any regulation or
inspection by any State agency. Mr. Corrales stated no. He further indicated
that they have taken in abused and rescued animals.
10- 28min.doc 5
Vice -Chair Wycoff closed the public hearing. CRAFT
Commissioner Mahler stated his only concern is noise but feels this has been
addressed. He stated they have done a good job.
Commissioner Boulgarides thinks the business is great and serves a need in
the community.
Commissioner Kretzmer suggested that the language under Conditional Use
Permit/Analysis, Item A, be changed from, "Although the use is not industrial or
manufacturing, it is compatible with these types of uses," to, "It has no adverse
affect upon the industrial and manufacturing uses, and that it is compatible with
the existing use of this particular property."
Vice -Chair Wycoff asked about the possibility of changing the language in the
resolution to provide a definitive time to cease the outdoor operations.
Commissioner Boulgarides agrees with 9 PM as an ending time for outdoor
operations.
Vice -Chair Wycoff re- opened the public hearing
Mr. Corrales stated 9 PM would be agreeable as the ending time. He said they
need this time for the dogs to go out one last time to go to the bathroom.
Vice -Chair Wycoff closed the public hearing.
Vice -Chair Wycoff agreed that it be stated no later than 9 PM as the ending MOTION
time for outdoor operations.
Commissioner Boulgarides moved to approve Environmental Assessment EA-
487 and Conditional Use Permit CUP 99 -3 — Overnight Kennel Operations and
Outdoor Dog Day Care and adopt Resolution No. 2456 with the stipulation that REPORT FROM
outdoor activities must cease by 9 PM. Commissioner Mahler seconded. DIRECTOR
Passed 4 -0.
None. COMMISSIONERS'
COMMENTS
Commissioner Mahler stated there were some good discussions this evening
with the research being great and homework being done. He said all the
decisions made this evening were in the best interest and in the vision of the
City Council and the City itself.
Commissioner Boulgarides complemented the staff. He questioned the future
scheduling of meetings. Ms. Jester asked for some possible dates that would
be agreeable to the Commission. It was agreed that November 29, 1999 might
be a potential date.
ADJOURNMENT
10- 28a,;n.dac e ? 5 0
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
MEETING DATE: November 16, 1999
AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business
Request for the City Council to approve the purchase of a Wireless Voice Radio system, hardware and
software, from Motorola as the next phase in the development of the El Segundo Public Safety
Communications Center project. Previously approved funding for the project will be used for this
RECUMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Approve the purchase of a Wireless Voice Radio system.
On February 3, 1998, the City Council authorized Staff to design and operate a stand -alone
Communications Center. During the planning phase, Staff included a state -of- the -art wireless voice
radio system. Staff now seeks to make a sole source purchase of the specific components of a
wireless voice radio system from Motorola.
The request for a sole source contract is based on the need for a system that is fully integrated with the
existing Motorola radio infrastructure, along with the ability to purchase the equipment under a General
Services Administration (GSA) contract at a reduced rate of 31 % from Motorola.
Staff requests that the City move forward with the purchase and implementation of a wireless voice
radio system which if necessary could include the engineering, design and construction of a primary
transmitter site. Costs incurred for equipment and implementation during this phase of the
Communications Center Project are not to exceed $1,250,000.
The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed contract and has noted that it does not contain the City's
standard indemnification and insurance provisions. Rather, Motorola has limited its liability under the
contract to $1,000,000 and there are no insurance provisions in the contract. The years of operation
and financial strength of Motorola minimize the latter issue. Additionally, given the wide use and
compatibility of Motorola equipment, as well as the reduced cost under the GSA contract, Staff is
comfortable moving forward with this non - standard contract.
nISCI ISSInN•
Refer attached staff report.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Staff report from Chief Grimmond to City Manaqer Mary Strenn.
HUGAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget:_ Capital Improv. Budl
Amount Requested: Not to exceed $1,250,000
Project/Account Budget: $3.812.950
Project/Account Balance: Date:
Account Number: 109 - 400 - 3105 -8378
Project Phase:
3
City of El Segundo
Inter - Departmental Correspondence
November 8, 1999
To: Mary Strenn, City Manager
From: Tim Gnmmond, Chief of Police
Subject: Wireless Voice Radio System
'M''• -
It is proposed that the City of El Segundo make a sole source purchase and begin
implementation of a state -of- the -art Wireless Voice Radio and Console system provided by
Motorola If necessary, it is further requested that the City Council authorize Staff to engineer
and design a single -site voice radio infrastructure.
The Wireless Voice Radio package includes all dispatch console hardware and software,
equipment and software for a back -up transmitter site, and necessary radio user equipment
including portable and mobile radios for the police and fire departments. Additionally, Staff
has included a contingent equipment list and related cost allocation to engineer, design and
construct a primary transmitter site should this be needed.
The cost for the voice radio system including hardware, software and necessary integration
and installation fees is $909,350. Additionally, $340,650 has been earmarked as a
contingency should the need arise to engineer, design and construct a primary transmitter site
It should be noted that $1,250,000 was identified and approved during the initial budget phase
for a complete voice radio system. The voice radio system will be funded from the approved
project budget consisting of asset forfeiture and general funds.
BACKGROUND:
The next phase of the El Segundo Public Safety Communications Center is to incorporate a
Voice Radio system that will provide wireless communications for the City's police and fire
departments.
Staff seeks to make a sole- source purchase of specific components of a wireless voice radio
system from Motorola by utilizing a contract offered by the General Services Administration
(GSA). This request for a sole- source contract is based on the need for a system that is
compatible with our existing Motorola infrastructure and current user radio equipment
A of
Further, to maintain future radio interoperabdity with neighboring agencies, it is recommended
that the City move in the same direction as identified by the South Bay Regional Public
Communications Authority ( SBRPCA) The SBRPCA has been working with Motorola and the
Moss Bay Group to design a multi -site simulcast radio infrastructure that would enhance radio
coverage throughout the South Bay It is important for El Segundo to install Motorola
equipment that can seamlessly upgrade and migrate onto the Authority's future radio network
upon implementation of this simulcast system
Finally, by purchasing the requested equipment direct from Motorola via the GSA contract, the
City will be guaranteed that government prices are applied, thus reducing the costs for
equipment approximately 31 %
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that Council authorize the purchase of the specific components from
Motorola as outlined in the attached contract by using funds earmarked within the El Segundo
Public Safety Communications Center Protect The City Attorney has reviewed the attached
contract document and is comfortable with a non - standard contract purchase utilizing the GSA
contract
If necessary, it is recommended that Staff be authorized to engineer, design and construct a
stand - alone, single site radio infrastructure as a contingency to the continued use of the
existing voice radio network
N 02
0
October 4, 1999
City of El Segundo Police Department
348 Main St
El Segundo, CA 90245
Re: Police Dispatch Center
Dear Brian Evanski
Motorola Inc., by and through its Commercial, Government, and Industrial Solutions
Sector ( "Motorola "), is pleased to present to you the enclosed proposal for the City of El
Segundo Dispatch Center. This Proposal consists of this cover letter, the standard
Communications System Agreement, the Equipment List, and any additional forms
enclosed with this proposal.
You may accept this Proposal by either signing where indicated on the Communications
System Agreement or alternatively, simply issuing a purchase order that refers to this
Proposal
Motorola appreciates your consideration of this Proposal and hopes you will find it
acceptable. We look forward to receiving your response Please feel free to contact Jeff
Reeve, Motorola Sales Manager at 949 -582 -9595
Sincerely,
MOTOROLA, INC
IC
Kelly B. Clayton, Area Controller
CC. , Account Manager
Barbara Paddock, Contracts and Compliance Manager
40
4 AV3
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AGREEMENT
ELSEGUNDO
Motorola, Inc , a Delaware corporation ( "Motorola "), by and through the United States & Canada
Group of its Commercial, Government, and Industrial Solutions Sector ( "CGISS "), and
El Segundo ( "Customer") enter into this Communications System Agreement (the "Agreement "),
effective as of the last date signed below (the "Effective Date"), pursuant to which Customer will
purchase and Motorola will provide Customer wAh-a Communications System._
Section 1 EXHIBITS
The Exhibits below are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement In
interpreting this Agreement and resolving any ambiguities, the main body of this Agreement will
take precedence over the Exhibits and any inconsistency between the Exhibits will be resolved in
the order in which the Exhibits appear below
Exhibit A Motorola software license agreement ( "Software License Agreement")
Exhibit B Motorola system description ( "System Description "), acceptance test plan
( "Acceptance Test Plan" or "ATP "), equipment list ( "Equipment List "), and statement
of work ( "Statement of Work"), dated October 4, 1999
Exhibit C Enhanced System Support Plan ( "ESS Plan ")
Exhibit D Motorola Service Agreement ( "Service Agreement ") and Motorola Software
Subscription Agreement ( "Subscription Agreement ")
Section 2 DEFINITIONS
Capitalized terms used in this Agreement and not otherwise defined within the Agreement have
the following meanings
"Communications System" or "System" is the communications system described in Exhibit B,
including the Equipment and Software described in the System Description, Statement of Work,
Acceptance Test Plan and Equipment List
"Equipment' is the equipment specified in the Equipment List included in Exhibit B
"Motorola Software" is software whose copyright is owned by Motorola
"Non- Motorola Software" is software whose copyright is owned by a party other than Motorola
"Software" includes Motorola and any Non - Motorola Software that may be furnished with the
Communications System
Section 3 SCOPE OF AGREEMENT
A SCOPE OF WORK Motorola will assemble and integrate the Equipment and Software, and
deliver, install and test the Communications System at designated sites, as specified in
Exhibit B and in accordance with this Agreement Customer will perform its responsibilities as
specified in Exhibit B and in accordance with this Agreement
B CHANGE ORDERS Either party may request changes within the general scope of this
Agreement If a requested change causes an increase or decrease in the cost of or time
required for the performance of this Agreement, Motorola and Customer will agree to an
equitable adjustment in the Agreement price or performance schedule, or both Motorola is
not obligated to comply with requested changes unless and until both parties execute a
written change order
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 1 Rev 04/01/99
kin
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AGREEMENT
ELSEGUNDO
C ADDITIONAL PRODUCTS For three (3) years after the Effective Date of this Agreement,
Customer may submit purchase orders for additional portable and mobile subscriber products
manufactured by Motorola's CGISS which are currently available at the time of order If
Customer and Motorola have agreed to a convention for processing electronic data
interchange ( "EDI ") transactions, purchase orders may be transmitted electronically Each
- - purchase order must specifically refer to this Agreement and will be an offer by Customer
subject to Motorola's acceptance Except for pricing and delivery terms, which must be stated
on the purchase order, Customer and Motorola agree that the applicable terms of the main
body of this Agreement will be the only terms and conditions that govern the purchase and
sale of products identified on such purchase orders Customer and Motorola agree that
payment for all additional products so purchased will be due within twenty -five (25) days after
the date of Motorola's invoice for the products
D MAINTENANCE SERVICE During the first year after System Acceptance, maintenance
services and software support are provided pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the ESS
Plan (Exhibit C) and the applicable provisions of the Service Agreement (Exhibit D) The
applicable provisions of the Service Agreement are those entitled "Service Defined" (but
excluding, for purposes of the ESS Plan, the first sentence of subparagraph B of "Service
Defined "), "Excluded Services ", "Right to SubcontractlAssignment ", "Time and Place of
Service ", and "Warranty" Such services are included in the Purchase Price After the first
year following System Acceptance, Customer may purchase maintenance services and
software support for the Communications System pursuant to a separately executed Service
Agreement and Software Subscription Agreement
E MOTOROLA SOFTWARE Any Motorola Software furnished will be licensed to Customer
solely according to the terms and restrictions of the Software License Agreement attached as
Exhibit A Customer hereby accepts all of the terms and restrictions of the Software License
Agreement
F NON - MOTOROLA SOFTWARE Any Non - Motorola Software furnished by Motorola will be
subject to the terms and restrictions of its copyright owner unless such copyright owner has
granted to Motorola the right to sublicense such Non - Motorola Software, in which case the
Software License Agreement (including any addendum to satisfy such copyright owner's
requirements) shall apply
Section 4 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
A Motorola and Customer agree to perform their responsibilities in accordance with the following
performance schedule as supplemented by the schedule included in the Statement of Work
1 Motorola will ship the Equipment to designated Customer site(s) within 10 weeks after the
Effective Date of this Agreement
2 Motorola will install the Equipment within 6 weeks after the Equipment is delivered to
designated site(s)
3 Motorola and Customer will complete acceptance testing within 4 weeks after installation
is completed
B By executing this Agreement, Customer authorizes Motorola to proceed with the manufacture,
assembly, integration, delivery, installation, and testing of the Communications System No
further notice to proceed, purchase order, authorization, resolution, or any other action will be
required
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 2 Rev 04/01/99
A 05
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AGREEMENT
Section 5 PAYMENT SCHEDULE
EL SEGUNDO
A The total contract price is $ 545,207 23 Except for the first payment, which is due when
Customer executes this Agreement, Customer agrees to make payments to Motorola within
twenty-five {25 } days-after the-date of4noices that will be submitted -by Motorola according to
the following payment schedule
1 30% of the total contract price is due when Customer executes this Agreement,
2 60% of the total contract price will be invoiced immediately after the Equipment is shipped
From Motorola's facilities,
3 10% of-the total contract price will be invoiced immediately after System Acceptance
B Overdue invoices will bear interest at a rate of 10% simple interest per annum, unless such
rate exceeds the maximum allowed by law, in which case it shall be reduced to the maximum
allowable rate
C If the total contract price does not include freight charges, all freight charges will be pre -paid
by Motorola and added to the invoices
Section 6 INSTALLATION AND SITE CONDITIONS
A In addition to its responsibilities described in the Statement of Work, Customer agrees to
provide a designated project director, procure any necessary construction permits, budding
permits, zoning variances and the like, provide access to the sites identified in the Exhibits as
requested by Motorola, and have such sites available for installation of the Equipment by
Motorola in accordance with the performance schedule and Statement of Work
B If either Motorola or Customer determines during the course of performance of this
Agreement that the sites identified in the Exhibits are no longer available or desired, or, if
subsurface, structural, adverse environmental or latent conditions at any site differ from those
indicated on the specifications in the Exhibits, Motorola and Customer will promptly
investigate the conditions and jointly select replacement sites or adjust the installation plans
and specifications as necessary
C If Customer and Motorola determine that any change in sites, site availability, installation
plans, or specifications will require an adjustment in the contract price or in the time required
for the performance of this Agreement, the parties will agree to an equitable adjustment in the
price, performance schedule, or both, and this Agreement will be modified in accordance with
Section 3 B of this Agreement
D This Agreement is predicated upon normal soil conditions as defined by the version of E I A
standard RS -222 in effect on the Effective Date of this Agreement
Section 7 TRAINING
If training is included in this Agreement, Customer agrees to notify Motorola immediately if a date
change for a scheduled training program is required A charge will apply to a training program
rescheduled by Customer less than thirty (30) days prior to its scheduled start date
Section 8 SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE
A Motorola will test the Communications System in accordance with the Acceptance Test Plan
System acceptance will occur upon the successful completion of such testing ( "System
Acceptance ") at which time both parties shall promptly execute a certificate of system
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 3 Rev 04/01/99
4 A 06
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AGREEMENT
ELSEGUNDO
acceptance If the Acceptance Test Plan includes separate tests for individual subsystems,
both parties shall promptly execute certificates of subsystem acceptance upon the successful
completion of testing of such subsystems Minor omissions or variances in performance which
do not materially affect the operation of the Communications System as a whole will not
postpone System Acceptance_ Customer and Motorola will jointly-prepare a list of such
omissions and variances which Motorola will correct according to an agreed upon schedule
B Motorola agrees to notify Customer when the Communications System is ready for
acceptance testing Motorola and Customer agree to commence acceptance testing within
twenty (20) business days after receiving such notification If testing is delayed for reasons
within the control of Customer or its contractors, agents and consultants for more than ten
(10) business days after notification, final payment will be due within thirty (30) days after
such notification and the Warranty Period will commence immediately
C Motorola may, but is not obligated to, issue written authorization for Customer's use of the
Communications System or its subsystem(s) for limited training or testing purposes, prior to
the completion of testing by Motorola Any use of the Communications System without prior
written authorization by Motorola shall constitute System Acceptance
Section 9 WARRANTY
A WARRANTY PERIOD Upon System Acceptance, the System Functionality representation
described below is fulfilled The Equipment and Motorola Software is warranted for a period of
one (1) year after System Acceptance ("Warranty Period ") in accordance with the applicable
limited warranties shown below Customer must notify Motorola in writing if Equipment or
Motorola Software does not conform to these warranties no later than one month after the
expiration of the Warranty Period
B SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY Motorola represents that the Communications System will satisfy
the functional requirements in Exhibit B Upon System Acceptance, this System Functionality
representation is fulfilled After System Acceptance, the Equipment Warranty set forth below,
the Software Warranty set forth in the Software License Agreement, and the Enhanced
System Support Plan described in Exhibit C will apply
Motorola will not be responsible for performance deficiencies of the System caused by
ancillary equipment not furnished by Motorola attached to or used in connection with the
System provided hereunder Additionally, Motorola will not be responsible for System
performance where the functionality is reduced for reasons beyond Motorola's control
including but not limited to t) an earthquake, adverse atmospheric conditions or other natural
causes, n) the construction of a building that adversely affects the microwave path reliability or
RF coverage, ni) the addition of additional frequencies at System sites that cause RF
interference or intermodulation, iv) Customer changes to load usage and /or configuration
outside the parameters specified in Exhibit B, v) any other act of parties who are beyond
Motorola's control, including Customer or its employees, contractors, consultants or agents
C EQUIPMENT WARRANTY Motorola warrants the Equipment against material defects in
material and workmanship under normal use and service during the Warranty Period Unless
otherwise specified in writing, the Warranty Period for non - Motorola manufactured Equipment
will be as stated in this Section
At no additional charge and at its option, Motorola will either repair the defective Equipment,
replace it with the same or equivalent Equipment, or refund the purchase price of the
defective Equipment, and such action on the part of Motorola will be the full extent of
Motorola's liability hereunder Repaired or replaced Equipment is warranted for the balance of
the original applicable warranty period All replaced parts of the Equipment shall become the
property of Motorola During the warranty period, El Segundo will be responsible for freight to
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 4 Rev 04/01/99 A 07
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AGREEMENT
ELSEGUNDO
the depot, while Motorola will be responsible for freight back to El Segundo for all mobile or
portable radios purchased pursuant to this Agreement
THIS WARRANTY DOES NOT APPLY TO
a) Defects or damage resulting from use of the Equipment in other than its normal and
customary manner
b) Defects or damage occurring from misuse, accident, water, or neglect
c) Defects or damage occurring from testing, operation, maintenance, installation, alteration,
modification, or adjustment not provided by Motorola pursuant to this Communications
System Agreement
d) Breakage or damage to antennas unless caused directly by defects in material or
workmanship
e) Equipment that has been subjected to unauthorized Equipment modifications,
disassembly or repairs (including the addition to the Equipment of non - Motorola supplied
equipment if not authorized by Motorola) which adversely affect performance of the
Equipment or interfere with Motorola's normal warranty inspection and testing of the
Equipment to verify any warranty claim
f) Equipment which has had the serial number removed or made illegible
g) Batteries (because they carry their own separate limited warranty)
h) Intentionally omitted
i) Equipment which, due to illegal or unauthorized alteration of the software /firmware in the
Equipment, does not function in accordance with Motorola's published specifications or
with the FCC type acceptance labeling in effect for the Equipment at the time the
Equipment was initially distributed from Motorola
�) Scratches or other cosmetic damage to Equipment surfaces that does not affect the
operation of the Equipment
k) Software Motorola Software is warranted in accordance with the terms of the Software
License Agreement attached as Exhibit A
1) Normal and customary wear and tear
D YEAR 2000 EXPRESS WARRANTY During the Warranty Period, Motorola warrants that
each hardware, software, and firmware product delivered under this Agreement ( "Product ")
shall be able to accurately process date data (including, but not limited to, calculating,
comparing, and sequencing) from, into, and between the year 1999 and the year 2000,
including leap year calculations, when used in accordance with the Product documentation
provided by Motorola, provided that all products (e g , hardware, software, firmware) used in
combination with such Product properly exchange date data with it All Product manufactured
by parties other than Motorola are warranted hereunder based upon Year 2000 statements,
representations, and warranties made by these parties to Motorola Motorola has not verified
the content of those Year 2000 statements but is merely republishing those statements,
representations, and warranties for purposes of this warranty For any Product that utilizes
third party computer operating system software, such as Microsoft Windows NT 40 or
Windows 95, that third party software is warranted only with respect to the specific functions
of it that are necessary in the performance of the Communication System provided under this
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 5 Rev 04/01/99
A 0�
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AGREEMENT
EL SEGUNDO
Agreement The remedies available for breach of this warranty shall be as defined in, and
subject to, the terms and limitations of the Equipment Warranty provided above Except as
provided herein, nothing in this warranty statement shall be construed to limit any rights or
remedies provided elsewhere in this Agreement with respect to matters other than Year 2000
- performance. - -- -- — --
E MOTOROLA SOFTWARE WARRANTY Motorola Software is warranted in accordance with
the terms of the Software License Agreement attached as Exhibit A
F These express limited warranties as set forth in this Section are extended by Motorola to the
original end user purchasing or leasing the System for commercial, industrial, or governmental
use only, and is not assignable or transferable These are the complete warranties for the
Equipment and Software provided pursuant to this Agreement
G THESE WARRANTIES ARE GIVEN IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES MOTOROLA
DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
Section 10 FCC LICENSES AND AUTHORIZATIONS
Customer agrees to obtain all Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC ") licenses and
authorizations required for installation and use of the Communications System prior to the
scheduled installation of the Equipment Although Motorola may assist in the preparation of
license applications, in no event will Motorola or any of its employees be an agent or
representative of Customer in FCC matters Customer is solely responsible for obtaining all FCC
licenses and for complying with FCC rules
Section 11 DELAYS
A Successful project implementation will require cooperation and fairness between the parties
Because it is impractical to provide for every contingency which may arise during the course
of performance of this Agreement, the parties agree to notify the other if they become aware
that any condition will significantly delay performance The parties will agree to reasonable
extensions of the project schedule by executing a written change order
Under no circumstances will either party be responsible for delays or lack of performance
resulting from events beyond the reasonable control of that party ( "Excusable Delays ") Such
events include, but are not limited to, acts of God, weather conditions, compliance with laws
and regulations (excluding Customer's failure to properly and timely apply for all required FCC
licenses), governmental action, bid protests, fire, strikes, lock -outs, and other labor
disruptions, material shortages, riots, acts of war, and an Excusable Delay of a Motorola
subcontractor
C Customer will make available to Motorola the sites when scheduled and Customer will not
otherwise unreasonably delay or prevent Motorola's performance of its responsibilities In the
event of a Customer delay during the time of shipment, Motorola may ship the equipment as
scheduled to a location as designated by the Customer or if no such location is designated, a
Motorola designated storage facility for which Customer agrees to pay all fees If Customer
delays Motorola's performance, the performance schedule will be extended, the Customer will
make the milestone payments as if no delay occurred, and the parties will execute a Change
Order to compensate Motorola for reasonable charges incurred because of such delays Such
charges include, but are not limited to, costs incurred by Motorola and /or its subcontractors for
additional freight, warehousing and handling, suspending and re- mobilizing the work,
additional engineering and standby time calculated at then current man -day rates, and
preparing and implementing a '%work around" plan
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP
Page 6
Rev 04101199
Rp
EL SEGUNDO
TIONS SYSTEM AGREEMENT
ccordance with this
GOMMUNICA been _
tance testing' such failure has uch
DEFAULT t+on or ac, default' unless ten notice of f
s
e1jVeN installs be in Motorola rov'de a plan
section 12 to completed otorola to to g'Ve notice to P
A If M °t °rota fails er may consider mer agrees
receipt of such
It MOkOTient, customer Delay days from the efault of this
�xcrrs thirty ome cure the any unfulfilled portion rd party,
caused by an will have customer to h a
default Motorola table to terminate system he
throu9 to a
that is arc er may bons System nications { t
action the default, CustoGommurnca s the unpaid Portion
able costs rn completing the Gommu
fails to cure cornP1eta the ent, les costs
Motorola s
g If reerfola If customer sons the Agreem to mitigate such station of
er may edin9e that sP use est so section entitled Um
Agreement a recover ecified +n its b effort f the
customer
not eXCe Comer agrees act to the limitations FULL
subl 1L4 gE THE
contract Price �$ section rs EEiIIENT W
rcement cTION OF THE AGR
Uabilrty of this Ag EVENT OF DEFAULT
Liability IN -111156 E
G Tl iE REMEDIES DONS LIAell IN THE customer
EXTENT OF MO saves
pTION hereby +ndemnifiaaccount of direct P sad by
INDEMNIFiC reel to and ustom damage or inlurY caused
agents
sr on is
Section 13 Motorola
a accrue against Customs
tors,
A GENE�romDalllllab�+est or personal m Y a Injury I tof Its P- Installation,
bEIrmless onn ° c testing
°{ the
harmless ible property sness, the deUveN,
damage to tang reckle�isey during e,
Ii ence ns any
Motorola's ne9 g tomes s P to this Agreement at its own ment
system pursuant Motorola w +11 defends claim that the_quipthose
mmun+ca onsu Y EM ENT. base on will pay
ING that is b Motorola are
YRtGHT INFR the extent the or copyright, and such suit which the
Customer to atent in any re condrt+°ned n
0
g PATENT hND9 Ost the e a Untied States p the Customer ants ar of Y notice sI such
ILS
suit brou9 are infringe b drugs' defenrsw dn9PyyCust1 and a an otabon
°�Mst and damages
Wally away by II a e be a I or rt
claim, tly su $O {{w Unitedo
to any such t be nobf+ed Prompt' defense °f Su Motorola e
attributable control of the meet or of infnngemeM of itner
following ') lvlotaro Will sole c° should the Equip of a claim eXP
arise,
u Motorola d III) a the Subl at its option otorola So
are °r °
claim; 11)
romp romise, an it M°toroE uip lent or M credit for
on I+kely to be errs ill Perm Customer a
settlement aP'NOn be ht customer w using the q or to grant The deprecation
Molorolas copyng t to contmu�es non mfnng� apt its return ch Equipment a
n
States
patent 10T C1Sto her same so that it bec° standards for su 5p� h
Software as depreciated d stand Pate" or
are
Procure o�r.0affy accepted accounting to anYu °Amen of Motorola will
replace t or Motorola generally with respect Eq Motorola, nor b
ed upon gang liability of the hed by fished y
the Equ'Wm be bas will bave no bination not fum' software not furnish
ter
So "are Motorola the combination
devices ant The foreg9bt Y h
With ed upon f ancdlaN equipment °r
emeriti which is software, apparatus with the Equ'Pm
is and copyri h s b the
infringement {or the use t+on nt of Paten
ereuany liability used in connec
furnished have any to or t to irif Ingeme
Motorola with respec arts therect, t of Motorola's
Motorola which t a of ttached otorola are or any p full eaten Motorola s
the entire Iabd moto o1a Softw section wile Y way related to
Equipment and er under this
of custom t are in
mdemmfi ationYeC from liabilities the
G Motorola's regiment of
+ndemn'ficatiori del this A9
performance
Rev 0410`1 199
Page T
Contract No 99 t3328lBKP
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AGREEMENT
Section 14 DISPUTES
ELSEGUNDO
A Motorola and Customer will attempt to settle any claim or controversy arising from this
Agreement through consultation and negotiation in good faith and a spirit of mutual
cooperation # those attempts fad, the dispute will be- mediated-by -a mediator chosen jointly by -- —
Motorola and Customer within thirty days after notice by one of the parties demanding non-
binding mediation Neither party may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of a
mediator, and Motorola and Customer will share the cost of the mediation equally The parties
may postpone mediation until they have completed some specified but limited discovery about
the dispute The parties may also replace mediation with some other form of non - binding
alternate dispute resolution ( "ADR ") procedure
B Any dispute that cannot be resolved between the parties through negotiation or mediation
within two months after the date of the initial demand for non - binding mediation may then be
submitted by either party to a court of competent jurisdiction in the State in which the
Communications System is installed Each party consents to jurisdiction over it by such a
court The use of any ADR procedures will not be considered under the doctrine of laches,
waiver, or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either party Either party may resort to the
judicial proceedings described in this paragraph prior to the expiration of the two -month ADR
period if (a) good faith efforts to attempt resolution of the dispute under these procedures
have been unsuccessful or (b) interim relief from the court is necessary to prevent serious
and irreparable injury to such party or any of its affiliates, agents, employees, customers,
suppliers, or subcontractors
Section 15 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
Notwithstanding any other provision to this Agreement, except for personal injury or death,
Motorola's total liability, whether for breach of contract, warranty, negligence, strict liability in tort,
indemnification, or otherwise, will be limited to the direct damages recoverable under law, but not
to exceed One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) IN NO EVENT WILL MOTOROLA BE LIABLE FOR
ANY LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF TIME, INCONVENIENCE, COMMERCIAL LOSS, LOST
PROFITS OR SAVINGS, OR OTHER SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL
DAMAGES IN ANY WAY RELATED TO OR ARISING FROM THIS AGREEMENT, THE SALE
OR USE OF THE EQUIPMENT, OR THE PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES BY MOTOROLA
PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT This Limitation of Liability will survive the expiration or
termination of this Agreement No action for a breach of this Agreement or otherwise relating to
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement may be brought more than one year after the
accrual of such cause of action except for money due upon an open account
Section 16 GENERAL
A TITLE AND RISK OF LOSS Title to the Equipment will pass to Customer upon shipment of
the Equipment, except that title to Software will not pass to Customer at any time Risk of loss
will pass to Customer upon delivery of the Equipment to the facilities designated by Customer
B TAXES The purchase price does not include any amount for federal, state, or local excise,
sales, lease, service, rental, use, property, occupation, or other taxes, all of which (other than
federal, state, and local taxes based on Motorola's income or net worth) will be paid by
Customer except as exempt by law If Motorola is required to pay or bear the burden of any
such taxes, Motorola will send an invoice to Customer and Customer will pay to Motorola the
amount of such taxes (including any interest and penalties) within thirty days after the date of
the invoice Customer will be solely responsible for reporting the Equipment for personal
property tax purposes
C CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION Customer will not disclose any material or information
identified as Motorola proprietary and confidential to third parties without Motorola's prior
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 8 Rev 04/01/99 1 1
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AGREEMENT
ELSEGUNDO
written permission, unless Motorola makes such material or information public or disclosure is
required by law If Customer is required by law to disclose such material or information,
Customer will notify Motorola prior to such disclosure
-- - - - D DISCLAIMER OF LICENSE - Except as explicitly provided in the Motorola Software - License
Agreement included in Exhibit A, nothing in this Agreement will be deemed to grant, either
directly or by implication, estoppel, or otherwise, any license or right under any patents, patent
applications, copyrights, trade marks, trade secrets or other intellectual property of Motorola
E ASSIGNABILITY This Agreement may not be assigned by either party without the prior
consent of the other party except that Motorola may assign this Agreement to any of its
affiliates or its right to receive payment without the prior consent of Customer However, any
such assignment will not relieve Motorola of its liabilities or obligations under this Agreement
F WAIVER Failure or delay by either party to exercise any right or power under this Agreement
will not operate as a waiver of such right or power
G SEVERABILITY If any portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, that
provision will be considered severable and the remainder of this Agreement will remain in full
force and effect as if the invalid provision were not part of this Agreement
H HEADINGS AND SECTION REFERENCES The headings given to the sections of this
Agreement are inserted only for convenience and are not to be construed as part of this
Agreement or as a limitation of the scope of the particular Section to which the heading refers
I ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement (including the Exhibits) constitutes the entire
agreement of the parties regarding the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all
previous agreements and understandings, whether written or oral, relating to such subject
matter This Agreement may be altered, amended, or modified only by a written instrument
signed by the duly authorized representatives of both parties
J GOVERNING LAW This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State to which the Equipment is shipped
K NOTICES Notices authorized or required under this Agreement must be in writing and sent
to the below addresses
Customer
Attn
Motorola, Inc
Attn Contract and Compliance Manager
9980 Carroll Canyon Road
San Diego, CA 92131
In witness whereof, the parties have caused duly authorized representatives to execute this
Agreement on the dates set forth below
IN WITNESS WHEREOF
Customer
By
Name
Title
Date
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP
Motorola, Inc.
By
Name
Title
Date
Page 9
Rev 04/01/99
R 12
EXHIBIT A
SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
A (\ 1
EXHIBIT A — SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
This Software License Agreement is between Motorola, Inc, a Delaware corporation ( "Motorola "),
and El Segundo ( "Licensee ")
Section 1 SCOPE
Licensee may acquire from Motorola's Commercial, Government, and Industrial Solutions Sector
( "CGISS ") radio communication products ( "Products ") that contain embedded or pre - loaded
Motorola software such as in a ROM, PROM, or EPROM, or other Motorola software provided on
media such as a floppy disk, tape, diskette, or CD -ROM All such software (including Radio
Service Software and FLASHport® Software) is referred to as "Motorola Software " In addition,
third party software may be included which Motorola does not own but is licensed to distribute
The terms of this Agreement apply to any such third party software unless an additional license
agreement pertaining to the third party software is enclosed, in which case the terms of such
license apply to said third party software This Agreement contains the terms under which
Licensee may use Motorola Software acquired from CGISS
Section 2 GRANT OF LICENSE
Motorola hereby grants to Licensee a personal, non - exclusive license under Motorola's applicable
proprietary rights to use Motorola Software in accordance with the terms of this Agreement
Section 3 LIMITATIONS ON USE
Licensee may use Motorola Software only for Licensee's internal business purposes and only as
described in the Motorola Software or Product documentation Any other use of Motorola Software
is strictly prohibited and will be deemed a breach of this Agreement Licensee may not copy,
modify, adapt, merge with other software, reverse engineer, prepare derivative works of, or
disassemble any Motorola Software for any reason, except that Licensee may make at most two
copies of Motorola Software provided with infrastructure equipment for back -up purposes
Licensee must purchase a copy of Radio Service Software for each site at which Licensee uses
Radio Service Software, Licensee may make one additional copy for each computer owned or
controlled by Licensee at each such site Licensee may temporarily use Radio Service Software
on portable or lap -top computers at other sites Prior to acquiring any Radio Service Software or
upon Motorola's request, Licensee must provide a written list of all sites where Licensee uses or
intends to use Radio Service Software Licensee must reproduce all Motorola copyright and
trademark notices on all copies of Motorola Software
Section 4 TRANSFERS
If Licensee transfers ownership of Products to a third party, Licensee may assign its rights to use
Motorola Software (other than Radio Service Software and FLASHport® Software) embedded in
or furnished for use with those Products provided that (a) Licensee transfers all copies of such
Motorola Software to the new owner and (b) Motorola receives a transfer form (which Motorola will
provide upon request) completed and signed by the new owner Otherwise, Licensee may not
transfer or make available any Motorola Software to any third party
Section 5 OWNERSHIP AND TITLE
Title to all copies of Motorola Software in any form, including all rights in patents, copyrights, trade
secrets, and other intellectual properties, remains vested exclusively in Motorola
Section 6 CONFIDENTIALITY
Licensee acknowledges that all Motorola Software contains valuable proprietary information and
trade secrets and that unauthorized dissemination, distribution, modification, reverse engineering,
disassembly, or other improper use of Motorola Software will result in irreparable harm to
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 1 Rev 04/01/99 q 14
EXHIBIT A — SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
Motorola for which monetary damages would be inadequate Accordingly, Licensee will limit
access to Motorola Software to those of its employees and agents who need to use Motorola
Software for Licensee's internal business purposes, and Licensee will take appropriate action with
those employees and agents to preserve the confidentiality of Motorola Software
Section 7 LIMITED WARRANTY
For the first 120 days after initial shipment of Motorola Software, or, if the Motorola Software is
provided pursuant to a Communications System Agreement or Communications Equipment
Agreement between Motorola and Licensee, for the Warranty Period specified in such Agreement,
Motorola warrants that the Motorola Software, when used properly, will be free from reproducible
defects that eliminates the functionality of a feature critical to the primary functionality of a system
The primary functionality of a voice communication system is subscriber -to- subscriber,
subscriber -to- dispatcher, and dispatcher -to- subscriber voice communication The primary
functionality of a data system is point -to -point data transmission Motorola does not warrant that
Licensee's use of the Motorola Software or the Products will be uninterrupted or error -free or that
the Motorola Software or the Products will meet Licensee's particular requirements This limited
software warranty does not include any warranty covering the processing of date data from, into,
and between the year 1999 and the year 2000 Any such warranty is provided expressly in a
separately executed agreement between the parties titled "Communications System Agreement"
at Section 9 D MOTOROLA'S TOTAL LIABILITY, AND LICENSEE'S SOLE REMEDY, FOR ANY
BREACH OF THIS WARRANTY WILL BE LIMITED TO, AT MOTOROLA'S OPTION, REPAIR OR
REPLACEMENT OF THE MOTOROLA SOFTWARE OR PAYMENT OF LICENSEE'S DIRECT
DAMAGES UP TO THE AMOUNT PAID TO MOTOROLA FOR THE MOTOROLA SOFTWARE
OR THE INDIVIDUAL PRODUCT IN WHICH THE MOTOROLA SOFTWARE IS EMBEDDED OR
FOR WHICH IT WAS PROVIDED THIS WARRANTY EXTENDS ONLY TO THE FIRST
LICENSEE, SUBSEQUENT TRANSFEREES MUST ACCEPT THE MOTOROLA SOFTWARE
"AS IS" AND WITH NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND MOTOROLA DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER
WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
Section 8 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
IN NO EVENT WILL MOTOROLA BE LIABLE FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL
DAMAGES EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES
Section 9 TERM AND TERMINATION
Licensee's right to use Motorola Software will begin when Licensee sends a duly executed copy of
this Agreement to Motorola, and either (a) Motorola returns a fully executed Agreement to
Licensee or (b) Motorola ships Motorola Software or a Product containing Motorola Software to
Licensee, and will continue in perpetuity unless terminated as follows Licensee's right to use
Motorola Software will terminate without notice upon a breach of this Agreement by Licensee In
addition, if Licensee breaches this Agreement with respect to Radio Service Software or
FLASHport® Software, Motorola may, by notice to Licensee, terminate Licensee's right to use
such Motorola Software Upon termination, Motorola will be entitled to immediate injunctive relief
without proving damages and, unless Licensee is a sovereign government entity, Motorola will
have the right to repossess all Radio Service Software and FLASHport® Software in Licensee's
possession Within thirty days after termination of Licensee's right to use any Motorola Software,
Licensee must certify in writing to Motorola that all copies of such Motorola Software have been
returned to Motorola or destroyed
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 2 Rev 04/01/99
A15
EXHIBIT A - SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
Section 10 NOTICES
All notices, consents, and waivers permitted or required under this Agreement will be deemed
given upon receipt and must be delivered in writing to the below addresses Change of address
must-be _ n inting-to-the- other_party- - - - - - - - -- - - --
Customer
Attn
Section 11 GENERAL
Motorola,lnc
Attn Contract and Comoliance Manaaer
9980 Carroll Canyon Road
San Dieao. CA 92131
A COPYRIGHT NOTICES The existence of a copyright notice on Motorola Software will not be
construed as an admission or presumption that public disclosure of Motorola Software or any
trade secrets associated with Motorola Software has occurred
B CAUSES OF ACTION Licensee must bring any action under this Agreement within one year
after the cause of action arises
C WAIVERS No waiver of a right or remedy of a party will constitute a waiver of another right or
remedy of that party
D ASSIGNMENTS Motorola may assign any of its rights or subcontract any of its obligations
under this Agreement, or encumber or sell any of its rights in any Motorola Software, without
prior notice to or consent of Licensee However, any such assignment will not relieve Motorola
of its liabilities or obligations under this Agreement
E ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT This Agreement contains the parties' entire
agreement regarding Licensee's use of Motorola Software and may be amended only in a
writing signed by both parties, except that Motorola may modify this Agreement as necessary
to comply with applicable laws and regulations including FCC regulations
F GOVERNING LAW This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the United States of
America to the extent that they apply and otherwise by the laws of the State to which the
Equipment is shipped
In witness whereof, the parties have caused duly authorized representatives to execute this
Agreement on the dates set forth below
Licensee Motorola, Inc.
By —
Name
Title _
Date
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP
Page 3
By
Name
Title
Date
Rev 04/01/99
A16
0
EXHIBIT B
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
E
4\ 17
•
0
0
Console System Descnpton
Motorola Account Manager
Motorola Console Engineer
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
Customer El Segundo P.D.
Date November 3,1999
Jeff Reeve
Lyle Abel
Exhibit B
The attached proposal is submitted after meeting with Sgt. Brian Evanski of El Segundo P D and
Howard Segal, of the Warner Group The engineering documents attached to this proposal
include all options, both hardware and software to comply with the dispatch needs of El Segundo
P D The RFP that was published by the City was used as a guide to determine radio
dispatch requirements.
This design includes computers that will run Motorola's Centrahnk2000 911 system and Elite
radio dispatch equipment. The system design supports one 21" monitor that displays both 911
information and Elite dispatch information. TDD is displayed on the 21" monitor.
Motorola was asked to quote the cost to add a GPS time synchronization receiver to this design.
The detailed equipment list is attached to this proposal. This design does include a wall mount
clock with 4" lugh numbers for the dispatch center Four time taps have been included for CAD,
911 and other time sync interfaces The time synchronization interface for the dispatch positions
is accommodated in the central electronics bank with an interface card. That card is included in
the dispatch equipment list and is designed to operate at 9600 baud
* Motorola Desk top ELITE Radio dispatch equipment. Each position is to be equipped
with
P C. to be located at each Operator position to run radio dispatch
software and Centrahnk2000 911 software.
- 21" color monitor
- Custom foot switch
- ELITE WindowsNT Server to operate on LAN
- Dual headset jacks
- Select and Unselect speakers
* The ELITE radio dispatch system will be equipped with a Central Electronics Bank
that supports the following features:
16 I/O relay /buffer card for door controls and alarm inputs
contact closure inputs only for alarms local .lamp @ 24vdc
MDC 1200 channels ( 1 for PD and 1 for Fire)
Conventional BR%4S for repeaters and base stations (tone remote)
MOTOROLA PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
Console System Description Exhibit B
. 1 Dual receive input module for monitor only channels
3 Dual receive modules to monitor transmit audio on 5
P D and Fire radio channels
1 Set of spares for CEB and Operator equipment ( No P C or
monitor spares included)
1 Call Check recorder for radio at each position (On screen)
The radio channels supported by this dispatch equipment are as follows
1 Tl /Rl PD Dispatch w /dispatcher transmit audio monitor
1 Tl /Rl TAC 1 Control w /dispatcher transmit audio monitor
1 Tl /Rl Fire Dispatch w /dispatcher transmit audio monitor
1 Tl /Rl Fire TAC w /dispatcher transmit audio monitor
1 TIM Mutual Aid PD4 w /dispatcher transmit audio monitor
1 T8 /R8 Los Angeles County
1 T8 /R8 Mutual aid
Gardena P D
Hermosa Beach
Manhattan Beach
1 T4 /R4 White channel
1 TI/R1 Pubhc Works
1 TI/R1 Chevron Talk Group ( control station)
Motorola has engineered this radio dispatch equipment to support 911 on the same screen with
Elite radio dispatch A decision had to be made as to the type of computers to be used (either
Elite or Elite AND 911) When operating two applications on one computer some computer
requirements must be met In this case, the computers listed are from the 911 price pages They
will support both applications In addition, I have not included a 911 hub in this equipment list
because the state will fund that along with the two positions that are state funded. Motorola is
assuming that the 911 system and the Elite radio dispatch system will be installed at the same
time
There were some licensing costs, software costs and hardware costs for the Centralmk 2000
software for the customer funded portion of the proposal. Those are itemized on the equipment
list, and the total hardware cost for the customer is shown below
If Motorola is the selected 911 vendor, then the attached equipment list will remain unchanged If
another vendor is selected for 911, then some changes in model numbers and prices will be made
• to this proposal.
MOTOROLA PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL n 1 r3
Console System Description
Exhibit B
• The costs for equipment are summarized below These costs do not include installation, tax or
freight
This design provides for a 1 year of Software Subscription Agreement on the Elite Console
equipment for3a'isataiers and 10 rr-a io c annels- - - -
Each Operator will have the ability to control doors and alarm inputs to the radio dispatch
equipment A total of 32 devices have been included in this design A device can either be used
for a relay door control, or for an alarm input Alarm inputs must provide relay contact closures
and only alarms in the general area of the complex can be guaranteed to work Loop resistance is
a consideration on all alarm inputs to the system Relay for Gate and Door controls can be
programmed for use as "momentary" or "latched" operation These relays are rated at I amp @
24vdc Alarm inputs interface with contact closures only.
No logging recorder is included in this design. Motorola will quote logging recorder equipment
if the customer desires
Spare cards have been included to support the Operator position console interface electronics unit
and the Central Electronics Bank No Spare computer or monitor equipment has been included
This design allows the dispatchers to monitor the "off- the -air" dispatchers transmit audio on 5
P D. and Fire radio channels This is accomplished by using receivers to monitor the channel
and interface the receive audio to the Central Electronics Bank for distribution to each dispatch
position. Since this receiver should not be receiving at the same time the primary receiver in the
• repeater /base station is receiving, the repeater receivers will be equipped with a carrier operated
squelch option which will supply a contact closure with receive audio. This contact closure will
operate a relay in the central electronics bank that will "break" the audio circuit on
the "off- the -air" monitor receiver during routine field transmissions This design will insure the
quality of the receive audio with out two receive signals mixing in the dispatch equipment The
repeater /base station receiver will normally be muted with dispatcher transmit audio.
Motorola has not included the following equipment in this quote
Logging recorders
UPS equipment
Furniture
Gooseneck microphones per the customer's request
The CENTRACOM Elite Radio Control Center is a software based console which features a user
friendly Graphical User Interface ( GUI ) and operates on a Local Area Network in a chent -server
architecture The GUI has more information viewed in less space. CENTRACOM Elite features
an intuitive, Graphical User Interface that operates under the Microsoft Windows NT platform
and follows the same standards as other Windows programs around the world The screen
layout is simple and uses valuable space efficiently Key information and critical functions are
clearly identified with easy to understand icons Dispatchers can quickly recognize these icons
instead of reading text Elite can be used with either a mouse, trackball or TouchScreen to access
these functions instantly Elites user friendly graphics will help your dispatchers learn to operate
• the console faster and manage information more productively
MOTOROLA PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
R 20
Console System Description Exhibit B
• Easily recognized icons reduce training time Supple point and click - to access a feature No
keyboard is required for operation of the system The Elite Radio Control Center is a product
offering in the Motorola CENTRACOM GOLD series of Radio Control Centers It operates on
_ industry standard PCs and requires a standard ethernet adapter This means that Dispatchers
will be able to nut o er endow" s Nr ` progrants- simultaneously {such as 6ENTRALINK E911,- - -
CAD or word processing) CENTRACOM Ehte mcludes the Elite Dispatch program which
operators use as well as the Elite Admen program used by supervisors to create the screen
configurations for dispatchers. The Admen program gives you the ability to create customized
screens per dispatcher or shared screens The configurations created by this program are stored
on the server for access from any operator position Once the screen has been downloaded it runs
independently from the LAN Some examples of customized screens are
Storm Plans
Shift changes
Special situations
The Console Administration program is provided as a standard feature with the Elite Server
Tlus program shall allow the console manager to perform the following functions:
*
Create new configurations ( to be used by operator or shared )
*
Password protect configurations
*
Modify existing configurations
*
Determine the number of folders on the screen
*
Determine the number of Patch / Msel folders on the screen (up to 16, 3
respectively)
*
Determine location of Patch / Msel groups on the screen ( 4 possible areas)
*
•
Determine height of patch / Msel groups ( e.g taller if anticipating many
members in the groups
*
Determine if dispatchers will have the ability to assign and deassign resources
during dispatch
*
Determine if the activity log will be shown initially ( could show activity log in
Admen and still Jude / show it in dispatch
*
Assign / Deassign radio, telephone, and auxiliary input / output resources to
various folders AND determine location ( location maybe changed in Dispatch
by dragging and dropping resources )
*
Determine where features will be placed on the resources
*
Determine the look of the resource ( expanded or condensed )
*
Determine border color for each radio resource
*
Determine audio routing of resources to speakers
*
Set initial volume level of radio and phone resources
*
Set ringing tone on phone resources
*
Determine icons used for auxiliary input / outputs
*
Name the folders ( main ); name MSel and Patch Folders
*
Determine items that should go on the toolbar and where on the toolbar they
should go
*
Save configurations
The CENTRACOM Elite Dispatch Console uses a Central Electronics Bank ( CEB ). The Central
Electronics Bank has long been the "heart" of all CENTRACOM II and II Plus dispatch Control
Centers, and connects to the Operator Dispatch Equipment via a 7 pair cable The Operator
. position will operate up to 2000 ft via the 7 pair operator interface cable If the Operator is to be
remoted more than 2000 ft from the CEB a Remote Operator Option must be included for that
Operator Position Some enhancements to the CENTRACOM CEB to support Elite are
MOTOROLA PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 4
Rz1
Console System Description Exhibit B
* Elite has a new high efficiency power supply that is modular in design
* Features are now licensed to customers by Operator position, channel and system for
easy feature upgraa eac
* The TOMI / AEI cards have been replaced with a console interface module ( COIM ).
This interface uses one less card slot in the CEB per Operator position than the Series B
Plus technology
The tools you need to communicate with field personnel are at your fingertips. Depending on
your radio system type, dispatchers can see information about who is calling, such as the time
and call type /status ( e g Call Alert /On Scene ) Callers are identified by real names ( Sgt Smith
) versus IDs Ten thousand "alias" names can be stored in the system for radio IDs and telephone
numbers Each alias may be up to 14 characters in length. There are dropdown menus and a
graphical toolbar offer a wide range of additional capabilities such as the real time dialer for
making phone calls Radio channels /talkgroups, telephone lines, and auxiliary
inputs /output (e g door, alarm) displays can be integrated on the same screen.
A Menu bar is provided at the top of the screen It is placed horizontally across the screen. These
menus are pull-down menu items for selection The selected item will be high- lighted and a
selection can be made by choosing the high- lighted item Choosing anywhere outside of the
menu window will close that menu window.
A Tool Bar, which contains short-cuts to the menu items in the Menu Bar, is represented by
. graphical icons This Tool Bar is located as the second line on the screen immediately below the
Menu Bar. This Tool Bar is capable of exhibiting up to 7 graphical tool icons. These tool icons
will be intuitive to the user as to what command they represent.
A clock is provided at the top of the screen to the right side of the Tool Bar This clock will have a
time display of Hours:Mmutes:Seconds Either a 12 or 24 hour display is available. The display is
synchronized to the time generator in the CPU which is synchronized with the Server; therefore,
all operators clocks will be synchronized. Setting the time at the primary supervisor's console will
change the time display on every console Only the primary supervisor will have this capability
When the W W VB time synchronization is included in the system design, all operator clocks will
be synchronized to an external W W VB signal that is received by a dedicated W W VB receiver
If receiver voting is included in the system design, and comparator interface cards have been
included in the Central Electronics Bank equipment list then controls for the voting system will be
displayed on the on the screen. Indicators for the RECEIVE, VOTE, DISABLE and FAIL
conditions are present on the screen from each voting receiver and controls which allow the
operator to force vote and disable a receiver site are provided
In some systems, instant recall recorders are included and are operational from the Elite CRT
screen A method of controlling the instant recall recorder is provided on the screen The
recorder can be located in the same area as the operator console and the recorder's control
switches will be emulated on the screen. The instant recall recorder is wired to record the console
telephone audio and to replay that audio upon demand through the unselect speaker, muting the
unselect audio during playback.
The dispatch work area on the Elite CRT monitor will contain all resources including radio
resources, phone lines and I/O controls, if these features have been included in this design Each
and all resources will be displayed in widow tiles All resources will be organized into folders
MOTOROLA PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
h A 2 2
Console System Description
Exlubit B
• Each folder will have a tap labeled with the name of the folder Up to 6 folders are available for
organizing different resources Each folder is capable of containing at least 32 radio
resource /phone line resource tiles or at least 64 1/0 resource tiles Iligher resolution screens may
contain more resource tiles per folder
Each folder is capable of displaying a combination of radio resource, phone line and I/O resource
tiles The same resource is also capable of being represented on different folders These resource
tiles are capable of being moved around on the screen to be placed anywhere withm a folder The
operator is able to assign and deassign any resource to the console
When Auxiliary relay and buffer controls are included in the Motorola CENTRACOM GOLD
"Elite" dispatch console, they can also be named using 14 characters The Auxiliary input /
output devices can support the following relay configurations ( relay contact ratings .... 1 amp)
* Momentary input
* Momentary output
* Latching input
* Latching output
The following are specifications for Elite Operator Equipment
Console Interface Electronics, desk top or in furniture mount ( CIE )
4.3" (110 mm)
Height
14 2" (360 mm)
Width
16.5" ( 420 mm)
Deep
0
90 -264 VAC 50/60 Hz
Power Requirements
Select / Unselect
Speakers
2 button mouse
Screen control
or 2 button Trackball
or TouchScreen
Gooseneck
Microphone
Mic Sensitivity
-65 dbm for +lldbm line output
Mic input range
-65 to -30 dbm
Aux Mix Sensitivity
-25dbm
External Paging input
-15dbm
Operator Computer Monitor Requirements ( Super VGA, 800 x 600 resolution or better)
with Mouse /Trackball 21" minimum size monitor
with TouchScreen 20" minimum
Power consumption for Operator Position equipment: Approx 5 amps
less than 2.75 amps PC
Approx 1 amp 21" monitor
125 amps 20" monitor
• l OA (120 VAC) Power consumption for Console Interface Elect
MOTOROLA PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL A23 6
Console System Desorption Exlubit B
• Server /LAN Power Consumption Specifications approx 4 amps with monitor
L�
- ---MultiporrUSerial-Adapt +5volts +/ 59/a75amPs-tYPical-plus lamps
for each port module draw
10base T Stackable Hub 1 amp (100 -120 vac )
Power requirements for the Central Electronics Bank are 12 amps at 120VAC
This should be a dedicated circuit breaker
MOTOROLA PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL A ? 4 7
City of El Segundo Dispatch Center Implementation Exibit B
Radio Base Station Equipment Description
0
Motorola is providing the Radio Base Station Dispatch Equipment outlined below
0
Five rack - mounted Quantar control stations and antenna subsystems will interface
with the console Central Electronics Bank to support dispatch operations on the
following channels
Channel Name
Transmit
Receive
PD Dispatch
4733125
4703125
Channel Name
Transmit
Receive
TAC —1
473.6375
470.6375
Channel Name
Transmit
Receive
Mutual Aid PD -4
4741125
471.1125
Channel Name
Transmit
Receive
Fire Dispatch
5090125
506.0125
Channel Name
Transmit
Receive
Fire TAC
509.0375
5060375
These five Quantar control stations will support dispatch operations by
transmitting/receiving via the existing repeater stations located at the South Bay radio
sites.
0 U MOTOROLA
Creation Date: 10 -4 -99
0
0
City of El Segundo Dispatch Center Implementation Exibit B
Radio Base Station Equipment Description
Five Astro -TAC sidetone monitor receivers and antenna subsystems will be
— �ssoGiatedAvah4he five-Quantar- control4tations— These- sidetone rece4vers- will
monitor each associated repeater's transmit frequency, providing the dispatchers with
live sidetone audio during a transmission During an inbound call originating from a
mobile or portable unit, the sidetone monitor receivers will be muted by an output
from its associated control station. This functionality ensures that the dispatcher
monitors only one source of inbound audio (via the control station). The sidetone
monitor receivers will operate on the following frequencies.
Channel Name Receive
PD Dispatch 470.3125
Channel Name Receive
TAC -1 470.6375
Channel Name Receive
Mutual Aid PD-4 471 1125
Channel Name Receive
Fire Dispatch 506.0125
Channel Name Receive
Fire TAC 506.0375
0 U MOTOROLA
2
Creation Date. 10 -4 -99
� 76
City of El Segundo Dispatch Center Implementation Exibit B
Radio Base Station Equipment Description
• One Spectra tone remote base /control station interfaced to the console Central
Electronics Bank and supporting the Fire Department talkaround channels and the LA
County mutual aid channels The talkaround channels will be used for backup
purposes should the Fire Department repeater stations fail. The channels supported in
this station are outlined below
Channel Name
Transmit
Receive
Fire Dispatch Talkaround
5060125
5060125
Fire TAC Talkaround
5060375
506.0375
Mutual Aid #1
486.5875
4835875
Mutual Aid #2
4970875
4940875
Mutual Aid #3
486.7875
483.7875
Mutual Aid #4
487.1375
484.1375
Mutual Aid #5
4870625
4840625
• U M0710ROLA
3
Creation Date: 10 -4 -99
V n n 'ti
n t
City of El Segundo Dispatch Center Implementation Exibit B
Radio Base Station Equipment Description
0
• One Spectra tone remote control/base station interfaced to the console Central
Electronics Bank and supporting the South Bay mutual aid channels and the Police
talkaround channels. The talkaround channels will be used for backup purposes
should the Police Department repeater stations fail The channels supported in this
station are outlined below.
Channel Name
Transmit
Receive
Gardena
4730125
470.0125
Manhattan Beach
4730375
470.0375
Hermosa Beach
473 1875
4701875
PD Dispatch Talkaround
4703125
4703125
TAC -1 Talkaround
470.6375
470.6375
PD -4 Talkaround
471 1125
471.1125
One Spectra tone remote base station interfaced to the console Central Electronics
Bank and supporting the Fire White channels The channels are outlined below.
Channel
Transmit
Receive
Fire White #1
154.280
154.280
Fire White #2
154.265
154.265
Fire White #3
154.295
154.295
. U MOTOROLA
4
Creation Date: 10 -4 -99
A ? 8
City of El Segundo Dispatch Center Implementation Exibit B
Radio Base Station Equipment Description
•
Four Desktop MCS2000 control stations with emergency uninterruptible power
supplies (UPS's) are provided for installation in the Police Department. It is
recommended that one of these control stations be installed at a dispatch position to
support communications in the event that the facility UPS does not come on line right
away during a power outage. Two additional Desktop MCS2000 control stations with
UPS's are provided for installation in the Fire Stations These MCS2000 control
stations will support the El Segundo's UHF frequencies and LA County mutual aid
channels in the 450 -512 MHz range
The console Central Electronics Bank will also support connection of the existing
Public Works station and a trunkmg tone remote control station provided by others
0
. � MOTOROLA
Creation Date: 10 -4 -99
A 29
r
EXHIBIT B
EQUIPMENT LIST
0
•
0
EQUIPMENT LIST WITH
CONSOLE AND BASE RADIO
EQUIPMENT
•
A3I
c
x
x Co O n 0 0 0 N w O O v O 0 0 N 0 0 0 07 (O O n O O O N O O O `
•W n00 nOOnNON000I[1w OCD O nOOn OOn OON N
C+70 n C) C) V V 0 CO O CD 0) LO n O OI COO n OO V 1n 00 >
1n E9O n E9 ERn OERN 0 v m fDn Cn CD F In(flLO n EAEAn NfA co
V co C
cO.j E9 4a 6 O N� V fA fR fA E9 FA CMV C7 E9 fiA
- — E9 ER - _ _�_ - - ER -- 44 - _ FA
x f9
W
NS ONS0 n COO SN 000 Omi 0)S 0000 r- 0O n SS n a0N
C7 C7 O 1-� 6 V v00 CD O w, ONNO NOn OOv Lo OO
W (a LO n69 69 O E9 Cl) 00 BERN nERCl) O64 LO n E9E49. n N(9 Cl)
a C cC�D , C\l co o O N� -q n, 694% E» Co Co — � , °-
CL E9 E9 EA 64 64 !R
a
N
(7
S 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 S S S S 0 0 S °0 S °0 0 0 0 0 S S 0 S S
y cc occ000000000w no D�n momoodoLnoo
n613 LO 940 CD 00 E9000vvmn w r- 60 LO E9ER0 NE4). 0
LO z
ER E9 iR E9 E9 E9 iR
w W
J O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
y O O O O O S O O O O O O O m S ON n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N Ci Pn 69�S °f969000 °F9SS 0 �fJN9 n 6i rlE°91 tO 4%6039 S N 6F).0
E n CD Nl 00 N Cl) � v rl E9 n w N� v� In
co Q 69 H ER E9 O69 Ef9 ER
W C
0)
cr
N
!D
m LL
cc O D z Ja W O CC LL I Z _ LL LU J Z
y a v=¢ 0 O W O a W Q v 2¢ O
c [LCj >� H 0 �aJ Cq CCci >�Oh O
U oNOOf -¢ m a[ o�0 r1Y oNQQ ¢
J LL r¢} a W¢ O N J } Q J LL T F tr m
w JCL C1. U W CA} w �¢a
� z C 0 z w O� W J J a J� M Z O O Z W Q 2
CD 6 LL o <aoQZ w<Q w ¢am x¢ L¢'-O2¢OO¢ cc
w F- CLQOOOOtn�a m����� d ��aQO�o Z�
A fA O a° W W N 3 w H a H LL Z W a Z 7 o W w H 3 W Z
W 00rm >w0Za > �n0O��O 0a1m >W�Z-
aFS =zoaa009°� -�¢ �Wxx°Cxx m aIa- =zoaa¢a�
c Z 7¢ U m m U N U H Moo X 2 Z = Z¢ U m m U y U
a aaoomoxFOOOa" - -a -- aaooxox��o
O »OOZOZJ000 �ZN —OCNCN C »OOZOZwJO
CO o 0 a a W a W a a a¢ O a,, U,, a O 0¢ a w a W O a a
O
C C
O m
O
yN :�
IL N U
O y O Z �� U
• Woo ¢ 0a Oppm N co H ¢ CO
N r m nmNSSnNSam00zNOnz 0)r a rmNSnOODDCno
O % U °O X X X X X X X X X O O- p O J F a CJ O X X X X X X X X
co
J .-SNP NN N
J .-� cl
0
a`
a I , `m- -��°_ -NNItt0MNw m rnrnrnmmmmmm (A 32
m
L
It N 0 0 0 o O 0 r O O n 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 7 O O O N O O O r c0 O
• x 0 0 0 w Co O CD O It n 0 0 n 0 0 n O O N O o O co oD O CD O IT n 0
W
'p cD COD pp�� �on0 MOn 007 w00(00000)r Inn O Cho
m 0070) cD n l00 co 00, C\j NM00007 0) cD n co W (D
'O N h cA fA c9 613-69 0 o r N O N h fA E9 EA f9 fA cp
C N 7 49 U9 vi t9 ' t9 N a
N h
w
It O O O) r O 00 0 co 0 n 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 7 0 0 0) O 00 o c 0 0
m O O O W (7) O co 0 n 0 o n 0 0 n O 0 N 0 0 0 m 0) 0 00 O n 0
CO �fA2n vya} (9U) n vs oven N OKM OO -ec9 c07 rl.64e� U)�
It N 07 h :A c9 d9 w O r N O N 7 h 6.969 K3 c0
m to 7 u) v c j 69 C9 E9 C9 � t9 a
CL 6% 69 69 i9 49 49
a
y
C9
O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00000000 000000000000000000 00
m 00co coo Lo 0 (0000000 w00 o ODD 00N 0 (Do
O 0 0 7 7 0) n O) n 69 Ip 69 69 O N 69 0 0 0 7 7 m n� 0 n di
` Cl) a h� r� ff9 to c9 n cD cm eIT a to Cl) a H q u) f9 69% n
a r co ui m
u� f9 64 to i9 C9
y w
J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O
O O
O m 0 o N 0 O O O O o o O O O O O O 0 m O O :N Fi O O fO
r p �a y co
v e r�oN V9 C90 ^9 hA E co l_ 6% c 7 cOOv N
69 69 69 69 4» r 69 r to O9
Q u9 V3 69 E03, 9
E& u
w
m �
N
l0 Q
m O V
m ¢ 0� 0 Z = ¢ LL -J LL Z
m z LL CL ct O z a ¢ O z cc D oao a a¢ca7S >aZO 0 0a0 a S
U 2 0 zw �NOO�Q ¢ OzC9 zw 7 M -7 O W Y J }~ J LL' W F J m a m 0 } J }~ J LL
g ` a Jg Z
8i 2 annacr ax E LL0¢¢�OR 2 ¢ C9acr CL LLv0
y w CC X0 X m 00¢�¢Z¢ LL w CCX0 XU 00
w 2a co— aC -j? T ¢ ¢LLOzoo 0 Ja D -j— E ccccc
J U O LL N
a FLL ZWCL N »oWWy3WZFwa F- cLZwa.0 a » 00-
mQ22a2w ¢a2z0¢¢¢F° —C CC my¢xxaxw m as
F dm ZZXZJ C zz�¢UmmUyUH ax)mZZ ZJ G Zz
p al ---a —a Q ¢¢pp2p2Jr00 p_I ---< —¢ r ¢4
V m n o o z o Z w J 0 a 7 Z N N ONE C p�
¢13¢110 -z OOQQW¢wpQQQp¢,,U�Z cc OO
c c
O cp
C
O
L
v y
O U 'lp U C\l
O d v O J iN O J
Nr Nr p 0N 0
N
uo c Lf) p CO � n amCD mcl o w0or NO CD CD Z
~ w
C) n0 Z n ZNO
cpy0 0U) o oorMW mcow 0w,a 1! m
Xa0 F-a 0 5 XXXXXXXX00JF-0J0 U p
LL U0
• " r r r 0 N r N N J r r r— .- r r r r r r .- r 0 N r N N J r r
E N M Itt M W U nor^ r- �n ������NNNNN p N�
N
c
0
v
m
s:
c
m
g
`c
U
a
c
O
d
O.
`O
CL
A33
I
L
X
w
y
J
c
d
E
a
'v
w
d
ro
m
v
co
• O
N
c
U
O
c
9
W
O
U
•
V
vc
W
d
O
a`
2.
T
r
a
N
V
a`
x
W
a`
s
e
P, 0 0 0 N U) O O v O O O N O O O
to
Co or, 0 0 ONO O O V- 0 0 ON O
O n O O n NON O O O 1 D w O C O O
to
n O O n O O n O O NO 0 0 C O W O
n O O V• n 0 0 0 D O W O N n 0
N
m O n r 0 0 V• O 0 0 1 D O N W I n
O nMMn V, 690 0 v m(D n m
n
OMOn MMn N 69)00 a m w n
CD NN ON V' nMMMMM
M
co CD N r ON V' nMMM
L•9 tA_- MM M� M
-
(h M M
69 � M _-
bMr
1% M -- M
V, 0 0 0 N 1000 V 00 M -0 M 0
WO n 000 N a 00 V 0 M, O
O n O 0 n N O N 0 0 0 0 m O O O
n 0 0 n O O n 0 0 N 0 0 0 m W O
. . . .
n 0 0 V n 0 0 0 D O CO O 1 ry N 10
C 7 0 n 0 0 V' 0 0 0 0 0 O l0
A69nMV•
4 0
CO, C\jaMCDOq*r
NM O NMI � MM M
w co-MMnNM000OViAC�n
� ° nM MM
CC' iA 6%
v (4 fl ��
M to M
M M M M
O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O IA° EA O COD 1A 000 V' V' N n CCDO
w CV C7 to Cl) V n � M M M M
O M
M M '.MM
to is M
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0" 0
w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N 0 O V n
W MCA 0 W M000 VMVnM't
cq cm V
i
M A
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
00100000100 G 0 co IO 0 L
n61 ., in % NM000 et v CY) n
CD , r MM
0-09. M � M
M M M M
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M, N M M O N
(d U)- tii»
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 w N m 0
M CD M V' r M M�
M r M
iA M
LL ¢ O 0 m 0
x ¢ F LL J � Z S LL
F 0 J
V'2Q Q U 0w0
CL cc a <'T1:a o 7 aW0
ci> ZFOCZ O �{a- z- O O �a
NQa��QZ m 0 1rW �NOQ�cc C) m 0 a
w�JM Wa Z0 Ow N }d > J1 =W�J2a 00 LL ccn>-
zaoaoa� a goz Q� aozaoaQ o a goz
¢¢JOCClcO m Clam ax wU¢¢ JpQ ¢ ¢ (D CL w CC
d Q_Q O0O Ja mJ QU 0LLN N �f�, a- >: Op Z Ja M:3 OO
3 Y r¢ J M m d W ¢ 2 Z U W T ¢¢ 3} r¢ J N a CC ¢ S Z U
°wwvri3w¢�a rLLZwaC9 �" »owwN3wzF-a rIZw
m> W U Z ~z U j w UO p to y O 0= m> W U Z U> w p 0
Wrzymm¢m¢ w m a mD[wF zmym ¢
xz0¢¢¢p -cr U)a: xW c ¢¢xz0¢a¢��m a) CL
D¢UmmUC) dmZZXZ -' d zZ�¢UmmUUUH �mUUX
p p Z O z J a a p j Z N N Q N m a mm p p Z O Z W Do 7 Z N N Q
c
W
C
O
r
A
U t
c No z r N Z
c(V� BCD �C°O NO 0 Lo (D
?I��NMNrnDOiamnZ�nZ d Owi��I�OniN rmi n D°D�rnamOZN
X X X X X X X X X p m J� O J U X U O X X X X X X X X X O p J�- m
r �.-� 0
fCC.777 -p �.( -�.-� rON ANN J r.- ��r .-»N
mLo <n lf1 'o O Cn Lo 10 1n Co n (f0 Q� O N W co M CEO C•U) Cl) ' 0 C•') CO -CC) CO M V' N w n co
N N N N N N N NNNNNNm mm co co CO Cl) co M Cl) CO M M M N 0 m M m
0
O
V1
d
>
s:
c
C
U
C
ca
d
CL
O
CL
A 34
m_
0
L
�W O O � N M O M O O O O N O 0 0 0 O N M O Cl) O O O N O 0 0 O uJ
co C) a 00 CD . -N 000 W COO (000 1� CO M.- N OO IO 000 CD O P �
1- O pO W V CO O N CO M M n O W O O It W O N OD t0 1, O Cl) >
9 LOM) O N � 0 NfAM d'm w r0 0M9 07 �O of �O NfAM Mt01� QOM M
iD N U0 Cl) f- f» 69 fR fA 60 h N N O r CO N ffi fA fA 69 M
C N CV GA fR fA 6s 6s fA N CV fA 64'.4 69 ffl M
r iH -__ -_ —_ - -- _- - __ - - fH 6% - fA
44
W
000 NMOM000Mr0C000 NMOM00Mr CD MCD
N CDO W W- N000MMO WOO MW, NOOMM0MCD
f) N Ln COa COONOD�OIO Nt000 COa �c00N OLL7N lt)
a vi ui
T
H
a
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00 0000000000000 0000CD 000000
d aO MMO W ON W 1O0 f0 0 O (OM O 100 N U00 U0v 0
V OOM DDMN Il fHMvvM f� MR MMNn EAMMMN00a>
.` EEEAAAAAA EA N I, N le a » N iER fA 609,03 f, N f- N V , It fA fA fA fA
Ch fA fA 69 fn
fR C6 69 vi f» vi V9.
sA 64
_y W
J O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
G N e 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 M O 0 N 0 0 O O O O o O M O O N 0
E E!iR NnNvEAMr�6s 64 69N CO Na O"1��6% �
d fA 443,643, fA fA fR 'i to fA 69 fA
Q f9
W C
N
0
N
m O 0 O 0 O
�m O LL Op-J O LL LL -J O
d x xx x ¢ 2 ¢
a z0 oao a o z0 ao a
U �Cw 0 (D r1w0 � �C7 r1w
c g a U) a� o w N a - U) w H wp w-i a ~
O O Oz OwOz Og CLX
wz r'n OzW� -&Mxo WOX NzW >- &¢oa[wz
2_ • W^ C H W O o O M¢ x Z LU O W N¢ N H O O O M x Z U W N
U J C WW >JOzUoOH�DM W tw -jOzaO8>
en IL M xW
a. °c U�OpzowmxaxWQ N Uwooz�xxaxw a.
U J c O U J¢ U U U J A O U J¢ <200 0-i
?¢ C r< 2 2 0 U F Z Z¢ Z¢ c 2 CO 0 Z Z x Z¢
U O Z Z 0¢ Z N N O N y co N x x 0 U- -¢—
Z ¢ N W W¢ x¢,— O Z Q Q ¢� W W¢ M � � OU �l z
N
w O
Q �
W O
i U y U
C r Z NO 9 Z
rl O
O N, a a a O M
co cc c
8 oZ U OJcoVgT F, F Z r O��o4 -tCDz n°oZ U
�� Q mVle,N�O�pcn -00 8314 C3 r..
JU J JM(S -1 000 J�-0 JU0 g JNC)JC�SO J JU f0
r r N
N N J N .- N N r J O
r^ N N N C
O
CL
E MO Om O'ONMIT Lowr1 0DM O ftla U'O N M�117 (0
r My `*v It%t 't vvvvv = '� u0'1 LO LO LO U� Ln LO LO LO LO
X35
m r
c
0
�X 000 070000N 00000 LO 000000000000 N 00 `
W 00 r N OOOIOOO 0 000 N 7 m 00000000 O LO m (D r d
p COO OONmm M 1, 0mN NmCD 0 m M 0(DW LOOm h0 >
d O LD m N 14% m 't? m O N LO mOm 9 nC7 U364V OON v N v m(D Oc0
C rl N CO 69 , 1.9 Cl) , 64 64 64 64 613,6q r - I n O W r rf9 69 609-614 N 69 69 69 64
W
000 M O0o m 0 x0000 000000000000) O O
00 r N 0000) W 000000 N 0) 00000 co LO OOm 0) co 0
COO r (D ON OD OON NCON CO 0) 00 LO LO LO r mO OD ONO
'v co co UO N 69 Cl) V 64 co n 64 `7 O Co 00 69 64 00 V 69 n t} 69 Cl) 69 co
CIJ 604 f9 6M4 69 69 b9 69 W. � 49 aD O CO C 64 64 69 � E9 69
64 64 613-69
N
H
Q
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Lo
d co O000 N00 LOO LO V 00)N 000000 O 00 N O 00 N 0 a n
p 00 ODN N69 ch V'�mn Oo O)LO cv CD 6969 '�r 0_D OD CO CD n a d'0)00OD
L C Of9 � � C9 X 64 V) (9 f9 64 ' r� Ln N N N fA 64 64 64 r� M 69 69
x
y W
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 o LO o 0 0 0 o Un
0 0 0 0 0 0 O m o 0 N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m n o o m o N N
d Y (D 0 LO (D N CON LO UOO LO MN O LO 00 W LO LO co 000i LO
E OD co N N 64 CO a{ 69'T n 64 Nr 0 co LO OD 69 69 V 00 < 69, V 69 f9
4 d N CD f9 69 N 64 N 691- - N IT CO r 69 c9 69 � Ni
C7 N N CV
CT C9 64 f9 C9 69
W c
d �
N
d
m 0 0
•` m O o O LLLLa LLLL Q LL X v ° aa O LU
c O °a°J LL a E wv¢ZCD CL CL aCL0CL�
O Hm W fnY� W W M >O cjjXH J y 0 'U
n ZCL0aWgoz Da W A xgwozu2a -oC/) -J >-
g 00�0007a a2 ° y wwm¢zp2aC7 C0�aZaZ cc
cc
T U Q Q> N w X O W Z N C J J a X 2 CC Z W J w X O W O
w T QSOZZ� - JUOLJLN m « WWOSWWNLLZamJULL0
O d CC F-- r WLu Cc r C ~ ~HW S Jrm F- LL wW S W
F- ZrU�Q2ZU W Q QQZ F- W W ZUQSZwZ
U R W LL W JOZ w LL°ZOF�j Z 'O U= W J ay] °OF -ALL OOO a.
d 0 3 0U o Q m a U U a U W 2 0 2 OU l¢ O m W 2 2 CL a 2 2 2 2
C Fr o Y m Z Z X Z Q Y Y p 2 F- ° Q Z Z X O Z Z Z Z
Q F- Ln22 °UI - - -Q— UU .. F- °2° JZ Q H — —
— —
W Q N W W Q S Q N N O Z S S Q Q W Q 2 m Z 1 r OU Q . - I I I
C )
O �
r d
N (di >
d d O
C m N U NO co U N C
o Z pE o ?
c N� 0I °n'LW)N o °? �on a�° V c a m CD 3 X O QUOOOm N(IO(ODO r2 �. m �O CD CD U)<O00NO O
0 i °O mV 'TNOO�O(n r- d� LOO N m LIj�O- ZnZ(%m On Z On Z U
93 m O LL -jc,)( -jo OJFOJ000 U. (n FO- X X X O O U JaOOJ�J F- c
• r r r r r r f6
J r N r N N M r J N N N N r r N r r L N N N
d
O
0-
E n^gn�aDmo N(m -q-mw �� �wC)0 N mow r - ODm
°: — OLnLOLnUOOLn(O0WCDCOwCD "� (Ocn0mWcOCON N In U, In h N N In 36
x
W
J
d
i
W.
a
x
X
W
4
J
C
a
Q
w
d
N
t0
m
v
m
d
N
C
U
V
C
W
O
U
0
N O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N o 0 N O O O O O O O O N (/1
p ry rn0000000000ao tDC o0000000M �
d p� coo Loo X608'rw W N aaayy n V mO tl 0 O ON 0 Or 0)6047C) r >
C 8 tD O CD r 69 EA fA n V) Vs to 64 0) t: r M Cl) N n M co
_ d - _ N Lo M N N V9 — _ _ R o C7 N Vs Vs Vs Vs
x
W
o 0 0 0 O 0 o O O 0 O M r M 0 O O O O O O O M r
d n M 0 0 0 0 o M 0 0 o M M w w O o 0 0 0 o O M M
V (DMOOIO OIOr r lO (Dr ON r CD o oMO to rO
Mr Vs VS7 M V Vsr nafA M tAr oNN co V 64 qtr tACO)
d m O CO r Vs V) V3 � v) 6% a) to Nils co 6% rV Vr
a iqu� 6ato
T
F-
Q
W
(7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0
y O LO OO tO to O aD n to aD tO 07 tO 0000 17 00000
0 o.o Fn vs v co 00 M w n v v M %w ON U9r M VS�to
` M a N N to V3 V) � fA Ld C.j � Cl) 6s H � 669
fl 64 �i 64 (A V) 6s 6a VJ to
x
W
O O O O CD Lo O N 0 O O O O O O O M n o M O o o O CD 0 M O
d O o o O O O O r CD an 00 N to sf n OO.o u7M0 CV o
O o069 VS ItM 64r nv�a 69r oNN tp v 64� Vsa
a n a to r �i 6% 64 �n 69 6s 6MS o NVS Co 6s N 69
N r N N
z
6%64 Vi Vs
c
O �0
on �J¢ W Wall Z0. U- -J
wvXZcD as oa _ja Qo> oao
>" Z;3 w >Oc W�W OrsO� ¢LU
cc m
LU O�a
w Co U Y W N J J W U J a J m O m m i d
CCV¢UZtoDa0� gOZO O OZw n-'Z
J�-J 1;t(=)x? ¢xoxz U aF-a ¢XO
d W W Om�W NLLZOEJ W LLOO U) LU 0U) W M W U LU
r Q¢�H W=ar W ZUQ =Z WZ 2— ZO¢ZQmZ LLZ
13 UCC >Jo-wDDOF- fn0O�0 �3 W m }ZU00
y ¢ >ZW=0-J000 LOU JVfnH =v>F- W W.jU
F UO¢O¢ x °Cx ==¢ 00 n003r Wxx
L OCCUfn V aLUUUa¢U V UZ C N OF -¢a00
d Q F- OQZZXmZZZ� NN 00 ZZ
d U) C] Z C] U¢ 2 R V O Z N N N W U 2 Z o 0 Z Z N N
m¢Q wQ m rr U¢rrrF- C 22 :3w¢¢wQrr
N
R o
O
M 00 CQ C
Q O
CD
CD J O ¢ V U
V M ct O r a tO V
6 U to tO tD co $ X tr0 C
d M 29MC>C,m¢o00Nw = ¢oco O L0 Lo
91 O Lo
Lo Co N ttoo ICJ too o Q U)CY ()om gq� ON M cOD N Cl)('jOp c
O a FXXXOQUJI- -OQJFJ F- O �n2 MQ)a 0JF as
as
> r
S J Cl) M M M r .- It N� r r A N N to w w w w w w r O N
V o a
0
a
E Y 0o CD C) cD napMO NM V o ma gto n co { y
r MW MOJM W MM W W M�MMm J Mmmm(n a) M %�y � •� (
$ _ _ I CD m
Emac- --
q
to
\
■
\
\
\
\
IL
6 as
00 LO 0 0
{
6.
�w
2
- -� -
--
--
_
�
LO
cm
CL
LL
/
"
k//
k
/\k
CD
2
0\\\\_\
)
®
®
2
LU
E
9
w
t
® -
ca
k
§
`
»
K
�\
§ §
kk
C/)
3
§£a3E]
-0
)
£om»U -
=a- z «2E
_
\
§§}[Ik
-
¥
<oo0CC n
E§ § §§
{
}
@m
c
°
§kk
°
/kk
88
`
ozzLu zz
��
-
B
Cl)
ozzozz
§�
oui womW
:2
0
j
$C
\
FA
!E
0
2
-
°
k
®° ~�
§ §}
k
2
a
2-xxtT
z
■ s
$ _ _ I CD m
Emac- --
q
to
\
■
\
\
\
\
IL
6 as
EQUIPMENT LIST OPTION
"A" WITH SUBSCRIBERS /
CONSOLE AND BASE RADIO
EQUIPMENT
l.J
LJ
f,�39
m
d
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
x
x LOatn(DO 00000 000000 000000 000
W M 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D O o 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 o v 0 0 0 0 0
N LO O CO CO 0 O 0069 ON LO O co V3 ON UO LO 63 (O(O0
C 0 L r MO OD C I'. - MNN r - MN OD LO Ot
C6 7
C7 N _ V3 63 LO M r 64 1.7 O M 63 Ln zi M
r - V3 64 EA fA VA H3 fR M Vi Vi 60D Y Ni
K �
fA
__- -
W
'
LO co M N O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O
a onMOO 00000 000000 000000 000
7 O (D to O 0000 0 N000 C LOO LOO N N to
y MLn n 7c0 LO NN 769 LO NN 7 e4 LO NNan V3 LOO
CL 699 69 O> LO N W. O LO N 6% N O LO N 0 r 6%
T 63 69 V3 69 613 E9 6p3 6F3 V3 03 V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 63
F
Q
y
(7
O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O
O O O O O O O O co O 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 o O 7 O O O O O
OM 7 OD 0000064 ON LO O(O V3 ON LO O LO 63 (D(D co
iD a OD co V 00 OD OO n r MNN I'- r mN OD LO 07
p CT&tl N r MNvy es� LO Mr 64 r U(M L!> aa (7�
F- W q V3 69 CO V3 V3 V3 69 63 V3 V3 V3 V3 N9 6% V3 V3
N yy p p p
= (i O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O
U O 00 O 00 Lc) 00 00 U000 00 LOO LOO NN(D
w d (DN 7(DM LO NN 764 UNN7 613 LO NN 7 n6% LOO
MNN V3 63 OLON 613 OLO N 69N OLO N 690
f0 C _ V3 63 V3 69 V3 69 (9 V) 69 V3 V3 V9 69 V3 64
V3
a
C
N
(D
d
E
CL
3
W
O
N J U U U
a0
C Z W A=N LU N W V N Ua
U U Z U _- Q S LO _� S CC LP = LL tr LO � � cc �
0 W Z m a ur a m a W O m a W O
v 2 O W -j p U n7 O U dn, 0 U S R 2
7 U Q a 2 LL U W LL U W LL U H W Q } Nr N ir
d W WUU IJJ �WQ W U)W ZQ Ww U)W OQ
W <LL�JIr U Qa �' U ¢a 03 mU CL -j (L DLL V
F -SUQ(L S ZW? w ZXma O ZXQ_V UQJ
d a a Z W 2- Z a Z m 2- O Q Q Z �_= p Q m Q � J 2
U O\I.W_�¢ mC °v > }w �oo� >} LU W w 0000VW >rz w :Z
0
No(nZd QN Ln ZOF F-N Ln ZO3W F- ZNL6DZOOF- d W C\j uj
N U U p p Z LL O p O� LL O F U p - LL O LL Q W a Q 00 CC
c\l m g p a Q O zoo Q W = w Q Q Q W = w Q Q Q O
Q ¢ a W Q I- x N
O
d X OX �X OX f1v�v
r 0 m CO U Q I, CD LO
W W= �i O W S U 7 N m W LO T o m W Z Z W
D LL S°'222 IIM�SC7 C7 1i�n2C7 m0 LMnS(7 m C7 IL ZZZ
00000 7 It 77 7 O co O co (D co Coco co co to (D MM M
M M M M M
�C O _ r 0 ml - U r U CD c\' NN UMcpp
M V 1 W Ucon N m)m CO v, v
a
O
►\4 0
c
0
W.
ao
E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, co \j O O O O O OM 0 0 0 0 O O OM tD O
x o0(D000O Oa coo 00000 000000 aC>00 O
W LD LD O r � Ln N M Ih 0) 0 o O LO LO 0 0 0 0 W O O It O (D 0) O
N n0) 0 M O)N V r (D LOO r M 0 -1 Ln 0) LO 6R 0)6AOO O
rOOC4(Dr 0 O N r N N OO r\ M O X604 0) M M M
M1A�MN61),N r LD MON MMr 6 M �� (D
69 E!9 fA E9 EA v N r 69 CO r E9 EA fA V3 64 E9 N E9 Cl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N 00 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Oa N O
LDLOMIrODa)Ln V LOO(D ooLOmo OOlna)LDO Ma 0
N N O M Cl) O M001lCl) LO NN LO NN V r�64 a) 0). Ln LO r
W r M69V N O CO 69 m LO N t&N 0) LON Q) co (H
60 6R 69 69 69 69 613,6969 64 69 69> 69 69 69 69 69 M 69 69
6H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
Lc) LO O L D L n O O O O 0 0 U) LO 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 V 0 0 0 O
N nON 000)N O(0 OD (D LO O 11 LO Oa LO W LO fA W69N 0 O
�p
r W M V (Dr O CD CD 00 r N N OD rM 0)O v0) Ch (O
~Mali bN60 N r M a N MOD t` r E M ^ O
1 f% 69
69 69 CO CO 69 69 M — 69 69 fA 69 69 6% C\l 69 64
N
CD 0 00000o 0000 00000 000000 0000 0
0000000 0000 o0000 000000 0000 0
U OMOI-1 OD Q) LO Or CC) (D 00 LO MO 0000) uic) 0)O OLn O
N N n Lnr M Cl) O (D tOa Cl Ln NNE NNN V rlV 0)69Nr� r
a O O6Aa N CO LO N64) 0) LO N e3. C\1 M LD N 6f)0) W N 4
� � Vi 69 (f! 6A 69 69 6A d3 fR 64 6A 69 69 6A 6R M fR U3
69 64
C
(tl
C W
E
E T
°- o
LO
w
Z
O
3 0c
(moo a a Cl) D w aW
J J N 00
o w ¢ O z CL W W UC7� tu
c � Z W W> W W> C) -j (%
C W Q N W W > Q w m Q w O 0' O Q cn
LU Q 8CL a Z-) C) �n0 NNW^
CD cJ3��¢ mo 0W 0(0 �r LL O� CD Z ~w OoZ> a cc
M H F W N M L L aYO > (%1 d J a O O a J(L LLI O Q W Z CL Q
p �° QO�Q �7Q� -= Oww z2 zW W v1 _J 2 >� 0�[
D rr LLMQ�Q O�a(n O - =F= =~ ��_ ~��¢ ODp F-Z0
O tw7CW7U1c -¢Nw o °Olww 200°> >w �o0 °W >Zw -cc
QQOJOF -�<M cn > -X CL �UNOO� F"�NOO¢Z jr �C7 W�
UUn.ODaO =O W F -(°��W 2ONO LLD MU NU LL Q VaaCD y0 RQ
N j20 f __ O V Z= Z Nm
Q Q 0 W Q Q Q = W Q Q Q O r- W w W U LLI
a rn a
OD nOC) n DM a c R
=
00�OMM(D n
M0)m(O(O V X V X VX cw) cc V r
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z J L O W J? N N V J{ 00 QOj r V C M J Z rl
F-F F-0000 OOOMN OONM OJ(D OONMN OD a 0QNvr Q f.
ZZZI -H MM L12N =T- n.2�SC)co agrM(Dca0 CL 2000 IL
M r OMWLO M OOOO U) LD LO sn LD NNNN NN (D(0(D(D O
N M r to (0 (0 M M Cl) M M M (O
.Q 00 0)0 r NMO LL LO N1D 0 Cl ca -0 0.0 ir, Ltl�D U'O a) OD (0jo 0 —2 0)
C r rrrr r^ LO LD . -(D<0 CD P- r, r` n r- rCO M CO .--
o
n
O
O
X41
m
L
x
O O O N O O
O OO 0OO
L)- 0 0
OO
M
ID
M
N
�W
O LO In 00 NM
N I� N � N
CO nMr
0 0 R N N
Pf
C
h
G
O> 00 V t0 00 N
O I� LO 1l
r
N
N r-CV
N NMN
-
R
CA r.9 i9 --
M �S9
_ to
O O O O O
X o)«.
C
p
J
Q
F
Z
N
FO-
F-
LU
NNIO r Ih CO
a) N n V r M
y
LL
O
ua,vaF CO 6%
wE
F-
a
Em rn
°' o
w
a
cr to
O
c
O
000000
000000
co
O ui u-) 0 n M
00 1- N O— N
d
Z
�p
0) 0a v_ O) 00 N
��
Q
�K)E^9�
J
O
0 0 0 0 0 0
Z
n(OOr
w
ON)N 0M+1
EA M1 H3
V
(n
VT &9A
a
C
01
C
0)
H
CL
7
Q
1
LLJ
O
le¢
�C.)
a
v o
U_
m
g U
9
a W
_d
C
o
Y 2 U
c
U
�2Q�co
W u
W W
v
a 7y
F
c Z
W
a°=
a
O? >Zw
U
W
W >> Z a
y
o
mOCQQ�
F-:O
T
U^ r= g Q
y
U
� d
<LuujMW W
CC cr
Q
CL
X22000
0!C"
Q UUUmm
m rn
c
U L
CL n
a�
0)�MO�omcoar"i
C� T
a
zzzzzz
1--U=
21-V-H0 0
O do
Z Z Z Z H H
Z03:
.Q
O+-N M C7M
N N N N N N
C
O
Q
O
co
C
M
O
W
U
2
m
m
W
m
a
Cl)
m
y
0
Q
c
O
0)
>
W I J
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AGREEMENT
EL SEGUNDO
Section 5 PAYMENT SCHEDULE
A The total contract price is $899,978 59. Except for the first payment, which is due when
Customer executes this Agreement, Customer agrees to make payments to Motorola within
—4wenty -f r,..a - (25)-daysafter the date- ofanvoicesThat wwlf besubmrit" Moterefaaccordmg to
the following payment schedule.
1 30% of the total contract price is due when Customer executes this Agreement,
2 60% of the total contract price will be invoiced immediately after the Equipment is shipped
from Motorola's facilities,
3 10% of the total contract price will be invoiced immediately after System Acceptance
B Overdue invoices will bear interest at a rate of 10% simple interest per annum, unless such
rate exceeds the maximum allowed by law, in which case it shall be reduced to the maximum
allowable rate
C If the total contract price does not include freight charges, all freight charges will be pre -paid
by Motorola and added to the invoices
Section 6 INSTALLATION AND SITE CONDITIONS
A In addition to its responsibilities described in the Statement of Work, Customer agrees to
provide a designated project director, procure any necessary construction permits, building
permits, zoning variances and the like, provide access to the sites identified in the Exhibits as
requested by Motorola, and have such sites available for installation of the Equipment by
• Motorola in accordance with the performance schedule and Statement of Work
B If either Motorola or Customer determines during the course of performance of this
Agreement that the sites identified in the Exhibits are no longer available or desired, or, if
subsurface, structural, adverse environmental or latent conditions at any site differ from those
indicated on the specifications in the Exhibits, Motorola and Customer will promptly
investigate the conditions and jointly select replacement sites or adjust the installation plans
and specifications as necessary
C. If Customer and Motorola determine that any change in sites, site availability, installation
plans, or specifications will require an adjustment in the contract price or in the time required
for the performance of this Agreement, the parties will agree to an equitable adjustment in the
price, performance schedule, or both, and this Agreement will be modified in accordance with
Section 3 B of this Agreement
D This Agreement is predicated upon normal soil conditions as defined by the version of E I A
standard RS -222 in effect on the Effective Date of this Agreement
Section 7 TRAINING
If training is included in this Agreement, Customer agrees to notify Motorola immediately if a date
change for a scheduled training program is required A charge will apply to a training program
rescheduled by Customer less than thirty (30) days prior to its scheduled start date.
Section 8 SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE
A Motorola will test the Communications System in accordance with the Acceptance Test Plan
. System acceptance will occur upon the successful completion of such testing ( "System
Acceptance") at which time both parties shall promptly execute a certificate of system
acceptance If the Acceptance Test Plan includes separate tests for individual subsystems,
Contract No 99- /xyz Page 3 Rev 04/01/99
A A 1
0
EXHIBIT B
STATEMENT OF WORK
1]
m
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
0
STATEMENT
OF
WORK
•
•
Created by Motorola Western Division S! PAGE 1 Proprietary and Confidential
A ffA5
L
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
- 1. STATEMENT OF -WORK - - -- -4
i a
2. GENERAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
4
2.1.
System Implementation
4
2.2.
System Engineering
4
2.3.
Core Technical Services
5
2.4.
System Implementation Team
5
3. SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
8
3.1.
Overview
8
4. DETAILED SYSTEM RESPONSIBILITIES, MOTOROLA
9
4.1.
Motorola's responsibilities on this communications project include:
9
•
4.2.
Deliver and Unload Equipment
9
4.3.
Perform On —Site Installation of Fixed Equipment
9
4.4.
Installation of CENTRACOM Elite Console
9
4.5.
Towers
9
4.6.
Install Mobile Radios
10
4.7.
Portables
10
4.8.
Perform Programming
10
4.9.
Perform On -Site Optimization and Test of Motorola Supplied Equipment
10
4.10.
Coordinate Site Access with El Segundo Personnel
10
4.11.
Motorola Supplied Equipment Demarcation Blocks
11
4.12.
Set and Test All Audio and Data Levels for Motorola Supplied Equipment
11
4.13.
Connect the Motorola Supplied Equipment to El Segundo's Ground System
11
4.14.
Provide "As- Built" Documentation
11
•
4.15.
Repair Damage to Existing Items Caused by Motorola
12
Created by Motorola Western Division SL PAGE 2 Proprietary and Confidential
i a
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
• 5. DETAILED SYSTEM RESPONSIBILITIES, EL SEGUNDO 13
6.--C
6.1.
6.2.
6.3.
6.4.
6.5.
ONDITIONS FOR WORK
Site Ready
Standard Work Day
Union Statement
Site Staging
Motorola to Provide Equipment Layouts
7. TRAINING
8. WARRANTY
9. SOFTWARE LICENSES
10. LICENSING AND PERMITS
15
15
15
15
15
15
16
16
16
16
• 11. CHANGE ORDER PROCEDURES 16
12. ACCEPTANCE TEST PROCEDURES 19
13. SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE 19
14. FINAL SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE 20
15. STATEMENT OF WORK APPROVAL 20
Created by Motorola Western Division S 1. PAGE 3 Proprietary and Confidential
V
ver 1 0 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
1. Statement of Work
Motorola presents this preliminary Statement of Work (SOW) to summarize
project deliverables and define project responsibilities required for integration of
the proposed El Segundo communications system expansion. It Is Motorola's
Intent that this document be a mutually agreed upon document and reflects the
most current understanding of the system design, operation, and architecture.
This preliminary Statement of Work will express the actual work Involved for the
installation and optimization phase of the project A final Statement of Work
must be approved by Motorola and El Segundo prior to contract execution and
will become an exhibit to the contract. Changes to this document will be made
by formal request by either party and approved by the other The process to be
used in the event of such changes will be the Change Order process described
in this document.
2. General System Description
Systems Integration
Over the past fifteen year's, radio systems have become more complex and
• sophisticated. Radio systems are no longer only voice communications
networks, but also provide a medium for information of all types, covering a wide
variety of new and emerging applications. As system complexity increases,
design, installation, and Integration become a more critical part of the total
system The skills required to perform these tasks have become more
specialized
Recognizing these changing requirements, Motorola reorganized their resource
organizations into a single System Integration (SI) group to meet these needs.
This organization Is involved from system conception to system completion.
SI provides a variety of technical services that can be logically divided into three
major areas
L_�
2.1. System Implementation
Project management Including project planning, scheduling implementation and
commissioning
2.2. System Engineering
Design, technical integrity and functionality of the system
Created by Motorola Western Divasson SL PAGE 4 Propnetary and Confidential
� A A P,
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
2.3. Core Technical Services
Ancillary functions support the development of a system design and
Implementation
The SI organization Is dynamic, we assemble a team for each customer. The
teams mold themselves to fit the customer's needs The SI team and El
Segundo will form a cohesive group that addresses El Segundo needs to arrive
at the optimum communication solution.
Each member of the system integration organization stays abreast of the latest
methods and techniques in their discipline. Our comprehensive training
programs assure up to date Information and skills. Motorola Systems Integration
personnel average over 100 hours of training each year
2.4. System implementation Team
The responsibilities of the project manager, system engineer, and the system
technologist, are described below
2.4.1. System Engineer
The System Engineer's primary responsibility is to assure the technical integrity
of the system design. The duties of the System Engineer are,
Analyzing El Segundo needs
Designing the preliminary system
• Managing the process of defining, documenting and acquiring El
Segundo approval of system programming
• Developing primary system documentation
• Defining final system design
• Performing system acceptance testing
2.4.2. System Technologist
• Participate in the staging and testing of the system at CCSI
• Perform the optimization of RF equipment sites
• Perform the optimization of the Centracom Consoles
• Carry out the Acceptance Test Plan
Assist in the development of the system cut -over plan
Created by Motorola Western Division SL PAGE 5 Propnetary and Confidential
A 4'9
ver 1 0 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
2.4.3. Project Manager
The Project Manager's primary responsibility is the successful implementation
and optimization of the system
• Allocating all available resources personnel, financial, and material to
ensure that the system is implemented to satisfy Motorola standards
and El Segundo goals
• Managing the project to maintain the highest standards of El
Segundo's satisfaction
• Assuring that Motorola's quality standards are uniformly adhered to
ensure that El Segundo project approaches Six Sigma Quality
• Managing contractual requirements including change orders and
schedule adherence
• Ensuring quality workmanship by all Motorola vendors and
subcontractors
• Developing contract documents including Statement of Work and
contract supporting documents
• Developing Motorola Project Team installation and implementation
plan
• • Conducting a complete inventory of all received equipment to ensure
complete delivery
• Inspecting physical condition of all hardware to ensure that none is
damaged during shipment
• Ensuring that all site preparation is complete prior to the installation
phase of the project
• Directly supervising field installation and implementation teams
ensuring all on - -site installation and integration and optimization tasks
are performed within contract requirements
• Ensuring all project engineering specifications are met
• Develop EI Segundo's and user training plans
• Obtaining El Segundo sign -off and acceptance of completion of
training and installation
• Prepare for and conduct regular progress meetings and progress
reports as required
• Assure that factory staging and testing is completed
•
Created by Motorola Western Division S.l PAGE 6 Propnetary and Confidential
A 50
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
. 2.4.4. Systems Factory Staging
Motorola believes that the most efficient way to implement a project incorporates
system integration in the manufacturing operation We first stage the system on
our factory floor We reduce cycle time from detail design review —io system - --
operation by staging and testing the equipment before it leaves the factory This
dedication to quality also assures that third party equipment meets Motorola's
system standards Motorola's quest to reduce cycle time from El Segundo's
order to system operation helped develop the Customer's Center for System
Integration (CCSI).
CCSI has been in operation since 1993 Motorola's innovative 29,000 square
foot CCSI facility is located within Motorola's manufacturing and testing center in
Schaumburg, Illinois Field staging at CCSI brings the final manufacturing
process close to the development engineers
Specialized technical teams work with factory and field program managers,
project engineers, and product group personnel to set up the system at CCSI
CCSI's staff builds systems from approved drawings of El Segundo, configuring
equipment exactly as it will be at its final destination Adjustable cable trays
suspend cables and wiring. Staff labels each cable connection
At CCSI, our technical teams verify system operation and functionality before El
Segundo receives shipment to their site This ensures that when the system
arrives in at the final customer location, and the system works as designed. This
process simplifies installation and dramatically decreases installation time.
2.4.5. System Documentation
Complex systems require precise system documentation We use the system
documentation to specify manufacture, guide CCSI tests, and to install the
system Later you will use the documentation to maintain, modify, or enhance
the system System documentation development begins with the preliminary
documentation the system engineer writes The documentation evolves during
system staging at CCSI, field installation, and during the optimization phase of
system implementation. At final acceptance, documentation is complete and
presented to El Segundo.
System documentation can include but is not limited to.
• Description of system functionality
• Programming templates
• Interconnection drawings
• El Segundo's specific test results (Optional purchase)
• Block and level diagrams system and sites
40 a7n7nnnn7a
• Standard system functionality results
Created by Motorola Western Doutan S L PAGE 7 Propnetary and Confidential
A5I
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
• • Box test results from the manufacturing line
• Interconnection charts
-e-Manufacturer's-standard aperalor manuals - -- -- -
• Reassembly instructions
• Interconnection cable description and inventory
• Printout of equipment parameters
• Inventory with serial numbers and installation reference
• Software firmware version number
3. System Implementation Plan
3.1. Overview
Implementation of the equipment will proceed according to a plan that the
Motorola Project Team and the El Segundo Project Team will develop together
This plan will become part of this Statement of Work. Generally, the
implementation plan will describe installing and testing the Motorola provided
equipment in the following order:
• Consoles, control stations, recievers, and other RF equipment provided by
Motorola
• Cutover /combined dispatch operations
• Fleet installation
• The following section details tasks that are to be the responsibilities of
Motorola as prime contractor, El Segundo, and contracted El Segundo
representatives
•
Created by Motorola Western Division S/. PAGE 8 Proprietary and Confidential
A5?
ver 1 0 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
• 4. Detailed System Responsibilities, Motorola
4.1. Motorola's responsibilities on this communications projecT
include:
• Assist El Segundo in specifying the system or providing engineering support
to El Segundo
• Install fixed site equipment listed in the Statement of Work
• Install fleet equipment listed in the Statement of Work
• Administer safety work procedures for construction and installation
• Quote specific construction tasks not covered by this statement of work
(using published rate structures) if directed by El Segundo
4.2. Deliver and Unload Equipment
Motorola will deliver and unload equipment, materials and supplies to their
intermediate and final destinations in agreement with El Segundo personnel.
4.3. Perform On - -Site Installation of Fixed Equipment
• Motorola will install the Motorola supplied fixed equipment as listed in the agreed
upon equipment list El Segundo will be responsible for providing any special
materials, special wall penetrations, conduit, sleeving, facilities documentation,
or other non - standard two -way radio installation related tasks the radio
equipment may require prior to installation of the equipment
4.4. Installation of CENTRACOM Elite Console
Motorola will install, setup, and optimize the CENTRACOM Console in the space
provided by El Segundo Motorola will also interface any telephone circuits
supplied by El Segundo on this contract into the Central Electronics Bank. This
interface will be done from a demarcation point located within the equipment
room (CEB) at a point not to exceed 50 feet from the Central Electronics Bank
equipment
4.5. Towers
This proposal utilizes existing towers and structures El Segundo will provide
structural engineering analysis for towers or other structures proposed to be
utilized on this communications system. If one of these towers or structures fails
the analysis, it will be the responsibility of El Segundo to have modifications
made to these structures so that they may be utilized.
Created by Motorola Western Awsron SL PAGE 9 Proprietary and Confidential
A 5;
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
4.6. Install Mobile Radios
The mobile radios will be installed by Motorola Communications, authorized
Service Shop in the-El Segundo vehicles, within a time frame stated in the
project schedule Removal of any existing radios in-vehicles—will-also be—the
responsibility of the Motorola authorized service shop. Adequate space will be
provided in the vehicles for mounting of the radios. Any relocating of existing
equipment (sirens, flashlights, scanners, etc.) in the El Segundo vehicles, in
order to install the new radios will be accommodated with a change order to El
Segundo Temporary installations will not be allowed unless a change order is
created If it is determined that El Segundo's vehicles produce excessive ignition
noise that is not eliminated by standard installation procedures and equipment, it
will be the responsibility of El Segundo to correct the condition The antennas
will be installed in the same location as existing antennas, where practical, in
vehicles that already have antennas installed Should the antenna require a new
location on the vehicle, the old antenna hole will be plugged with an appropriate
rubber plug. On new antenna installations, the antennas will be installed on the
roof where practical. Where the antennas cannot be installed on the roof, the
location will be determined by the Motorola Engineer.
4.7. Portables
Each hand held radio will be programmed, tested and distributed to El Segundo.
Each unit will be programmed and tested from a template approved by El
Segundo Modifications required to the template by El Segundo after the units
have been programmed will be handled under a change order.
4.8. Perform Programming
Motorola will inventory and record all serial numbers of the new radios. Motorola
and El Segundo will create the fleetmap at the beginning of the project A
maximum of twenty -seven radio programming templates will be made. Motorola
will program the consoles, mobiles, control stations, and portables. When the
fleetmap is approved by El Segundo, Motorola will program the fleet one (1) time
under the contract. Changes made by El Segundo after the first programming
will be accommodated through the change order process
4.9. Perform On -Site Optimization and Test of Motorola Supplied
Equipment
Motorola will verify correct operation of all Motorola supplied equipment as the
equipment is installed Once the equipment has been verified that it is correctly
installed, Motorola's System Technologist will optimize the entire system.
4.10. Coordinate Site Access with El Segundo Personnel
Motorola will coordinate site access on a mutually approved schedule with El
! Segundo.
Created by Motorola Western Divinon S l PAGE 10 Propnetary and Confidential
A 54
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
4.11. Motorola Supplied Equipment Demarcation Blocks
Motorola will install and connect all audio, control, and data cables for Motorola
supplied equpment to Motorola supplied demarcation blocks at each radio site
and the central site equipment location El Segundo will be responsible for
connecting El Segundo supplied inter -site transmission network to these
demarcation blocks
4.12. Set and Test All Audio and Data Levels for Motorola Supplied
Equipment
Motorola will verify and reset as necessary, all audio and data levels between
Motorola supplied equipment and the inter -site transmission network
demarcation points. Problems noted with the network will be referred to El
Segundo for resolution Delays to Motorola that require an additional site visit
due to network problems will be considered outside of normal Installation and will
be charged accordingly
4.13. Connect the Motorola Supplied Equipment to El Segundo's
Ground System
Motorola will connect the Motorola supplied ground conductors to CUSTOMER
supplied site ground
• 4.14. Provide "As- Built" Documentation
Motorola will supply "as- built" documentation as provided with all systems. The
documentation will consist of.
• Plan and elevation views of the equipment installation at the radio site.
• Plan and elevation views of the site equipment at each dispatch center
• Equipment inter - cabling diagrams for each site
• Demarcation wiring lists
• Software versions and equipment wiring by equipment site.
• Maintenance manuals for all site equipment
• Site inventory lists.
• Programming and level setting data sheets.
• Acceptance Test Plan test sheets and results
•
Created by Motorola Western Division S/ PAGE I 1 Proprietary and Confidential
A55
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
4.15. Repair Damage to Existing Items Caused by Motorola
Motorola will repair or restore to original condition damage to existing items
caused by Motorola in the course of performing work described in this Statement
-of Work - - - -- -
Created by Motorola Western Drvtston SL PAGE 12 Propnetary and Confidential
A 56
ver 10
STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
5.
Detailed System Responsibilities, El Segundo
-- •-
EtSegundo-wtttprovide -two representatives to witness -the - -Systems Factory
staging and Acceptance Test at the CCSI center within the Motorola's
manufacturing and testing center in Schaumburg, IL
Provide a single point of contact for system implementation.
•
Supply a single point ground, five ohms or less, to be used on all fixed
equipment supplied under this proposal. Supply tie point within 3 feet from
the supplied Motorola equipment
Bring grounding system up to Motorola Fixed Network Standards
•
Supply, if required, electrical service and wiring, including the installation and
wiring of UPS's (conduit, circuit breakers, outlets, etc ) at each equipment
location
Provide floor space and desk space for the supplied equipment under this
proposal
•
Supply primary commercial power, wiring, and cable termination's.
Provide adequate environmental control for system equipment in buildings
supplied by CUSTOMER.
. •
Provide as required adequate generator backup for system components.
•
Supply all permits as required
Provide and supply wall penetrations and conduit where required for control
cables and /or antenna cables.
•
Provide A. C. outlets (20 amp simplex or duplex with ground) for all major
radio equipment within 3 feet of each piece of the equipment
•
Provide obstruction free area for the cable run between the demarcation point
and the communications equipment.
•
Supply interior building cable trays and wire supports.
•
Supply engineering and drafting as required for modifications to plant
drawings for site construction
•
Relocate existing equipment within a shelter, building, or on a tower if
necessary, to accommodate the Motorola supplied equipment
Provide warehousing for the Motorola supplied equipment if warehousing is
needed.
•
Remove fixed equipment that is being replaced
• •
Posting the RF license for radio sites prior to equipment installation.
Created by Motorola Western Awsion S/ PAGE 13 Propnetary and Confidential
A 57
•
ver 1 0 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
• Provide site access to all fixed equipment locations.
• Repair or replace Ice Bridges, Lights, Grounds, Etc Associated with towers
and- buildings that do not meet OSHA safety- requirements,-City, or County _
codes, or do not meet Motorola Fixed Network Standards
Supply sites including buildings for main dispatch and towers at all locations
to implement the proposed system
• Supply the telephone circuits as required to accommodate the audio and data
signals required for the Motorola - provided system. Links require at the least,
voice -- grade, point - -to -- point, private line, non -- switched full duplex circuit,
such as a Type 3002, Type 420, or Type 5 The circuit must provide a net
loss of 16 dB ( +/- 4dB) with a 0 dB level 1000Hz tone applied. Motorola will
ensure CUSTOMER has provided and tested this circuit prior to connection
into the Motorola supplied equipment.
• Supply telephone demarcation points and protective devices as required for
equipment operation.
• Label and identify specific circuits on telephone circuits blocks installed by
CUSTOMER or their agent
• Storage of subscriber equipment removed by Motorola.
Created by Motorola Western Division SI PAGE 14 Propnetary and Confidential
A 58
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
6. Conditions For Work
- - — -- 6.1. - -Sitefteady— —
Motorola will begin work at a site only after, mutual agreement by El Segundo
and Motorola, that site is deemed ready, and released by El Segundo, according
to the project schedule. At a minimum, Site Ready shall consist of adequate
room in an existing building or shelter to accommodate the equipment to be
installed, electrical service and internal distribution in place as defined in this
Statement of Work.
6.2. Standard Work Day
The Standard Work Day shall be defined to be 8.00 A.M to 5:00 P M , Monday
through Friday, excluding scheduled holidays which will be included as an
addendum to the Statement of Work during the period of performance of the
agreement The standard work day shall include a 30 minute lunch and two 15
minute breaks Neither Motorola nor El Segundo shall be constrained to this
standard work day if they are making up for self imposed delays
6.3. Union Statement
When it is necessary for Motorola personnel to interact with employees of El
Segundo or any of its subsidiaries, subcontractors, or associates that are
members of a local, state or national labor organization, El Segundo shall protect
the right to work of Motorola's personnel and will be solely responsible for any
coordination or compensation that results from any action or delay caused by the
labor organization
6.4. Site Staging
The implementation pricing, consisting of installation, optimization, project
management, systems engineering, acceptance testing, documentation, and
other services requested and required and described in this statement of work
has been based on complete pre- shipment staging and acceptance
6.5. Motorola to Provide Equipment Layouts
Motorola will provide equipment layouts for the fixed equipment site as a drawing
layer on the equipment room plan and elevation views The plan and elevation
views will be generated by Motorola based on site walks of the radio site. These
will be used for budding the equipment and cabling for the site and will become
part of the final system documentation.
Implementation of the two -way radio system equipment will proceed in
accordance to a plan that is jointly developed by the Motorola Project Team and
El Segundo Project Team. This plan, once completed will become part of this
Created by Motorola Western Dinnon &I PAGE 15 Propnetwy and Confidential
A 59
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
Statement of Work The basic implementation plan would consist of installation
and testing of the Motorola provided equipment in the following order
Fixed equipment-fnfrastructure at locations specified-as �site-ready' - - - —
• Sites have been turned over to Motorola for installation to begin
7. Training
Liability issues prohibit Motorola instructors from addressing any procedural
matters. Motorola will not test the students for a "pass or fail" grade
8. Warranty
The Contract section of this proposal describes Motorola's warranty.
9. Software Licenses
Motorola will include properly executed software agreements required in the final
agreement.
10. Licensing and Permits
It is El Segundo's responsibility for obtaining licenses and permits. Any delays
. due to obtaining licenses or permits that may significantly affect project duration
may require additional charges for remobdization of Motorola personnel or
warehousing of equipment These charges are the responsibility of El Segundo.
11. Change Order Procedures
El Segundo and Motorola will adhere to the following guidelines and procedures
to ensure that all changes to the Agreement (Contract) are properly documented,
reviewed, and approved prior to inclusion into the document Changes to an
agreement include, but are not limited to, such items as: changes to the
equipment ordered, changes to contract verbiage, adjustments of the project
schedule, or changes in service options. A change order is an amendment to
the contract if it requires authorization by the El Segundo.
All change orders must be documented, clearly stating the scope of work,
responsible parties doing the work, a dollar amount, a schedule impact, and
containing approval signatures
All change orders require appropriate authorization before work begins
All change orders must be communicated to the people or organizations
impacted by the change
0
Created by Motorola Western Division SI PAGE 16 Propnetary and Confidential
Aso
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
• All change orders must conform to the scope of work authorized by EI
Segundo
El Segundo Initiated Change Orders
A change order initiated by the customer will generally expand or reduce the
original scope of work to include changes in performance, features, hardware
and software, or services A change order that will amend the contract in either
scope or dollar value will require a El Segundo purchase order or similar
document to authorize the changes. A change order that will reduce the original
contract does not require a formal written notification from El Segundo Keeping
in mind that an El Segundo reduction in the scope of the project may mean that
Motorola may not be able to stand behind the original system design criteria and
original performance of the system In all cases, work will not be performed
without written authorization from El Segundo
Motorola Initiated Change Orders
A Motorola initiated change order also requires El Segundo authorization. When
Motorola wishes to expand or reduce the original scope of work to include
changes in performance, features, hardware or software, or services, we will
initiate a change order A change order that amends the contract in either scope
or dollar value will require written authorization from El Segundo A change
order that reduces the original contract, in every instance, requires a formal
• written notification from El Segundo. In all cases, work will not be performed
without written authorization from El Segundo.
Changes in the statement of work, equipment quantities, equipment types, or
services other than El Segundo and Motorola agreeing to in the detailed design
review will require a change order The specific mechanics of this process can
be developed during contract development. The basic change order process will
require that either party request changes in writing Once this change order
request has been received, the receiving party has 10 days to respond to the
request for change. A change order does not become binding on either or both
parties until it has been fully reconciled and executed by the appropriate parties
for both El Segundo and Motorola
Created by Motorola Western Division Sb PAGE 17 Proprietary and Confidential
A61
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
• SAMPLE CHANGE ORDER FORM
Purchaser: Change Order No.
Name.
Address*
Date
In accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement dated
, 1998, the following changes are approved.
Contract Price Adjustments:
Original Contract Value
$
Previous Change Order amounts #1 through _
$
This Change Order #
$
New Contract Value
$
Completion Date Adjustments*
Original Completion Date
Previous Schedule Change #1 through
This Schedule Change #
New Completion Date
Unless amended above, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties have caused this Agreement to be
executed as of the last day and year signed below
Purchaser
By By.
Title Title.
Date-
0
Created by Motorola Western Division SI
PAGE 18
Date.
Motorola, Inc.
Propnetary and Confidential
A62
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
• 12. Acceptance Test Procedures
_Any system testing that El Segundo wantsperformed that is not specified in the
ATP section of this proposal is subject to negotiation
This portion of the document details the Acceptance Test Procedures to confirm
that the system as provided by Motorola is complete and meets the acceptance
test criteria
The Functional Acceptance Test will duplicate the functional test performed at
the CCSI during staging The infrastructure equipment will be installed,
optimized, and functionally tested under the joint supervision of El Segundo and
Motorola
The above acceptance tests will be performed by Motorola and witnessed by El
Segundo personnel during the installation and testing phases
Each segment will be tested independently using detailed check sheets to be
provided by Motorola, as appropriate, and approved by El Segundo prior to
commencement of acceptance testing. If deficiencies are found during the
testing, both the deficiencies and resolutions to the deficiencies shall be agreed
upon and documented Where the defined deficiencies do not prevent productive
operational use of the system, El Segundo will grant conditional acceptance to
Motorola, and the test will be deemed to have been completed Conditional
• acceptance shall be defined as, the user having substantial beneficial use of the
system Beneficial use means that if El Segundo commences use of the system
or any subsystem thereof for its intended purpose, other than for the express
purposes of training or testing, prior to system acceptance, final payment for said
system or sub -- system shall be due
Motorola will, however, remain responsible for the resolution of the remaining
deficiencies as agreed to.
By signing and approving each of the acceptance testing area, where no new
deficiencies have been identified in writing, El Segundo shall indicate their
acceptance by signing the appropriate acceptance document.
13. System Acceptance
El Segundo will accept this project upon the installation, optimization, and
successful completion of the Acceptance Test Plan, or beneficial use of the
equipment, which ever occurs first. Beneficial use means that if El Segundo
commences use of the system or any sub - system thereof for its intended
purpose, other than for the express purposes of training or testing, prior to
system acceptance, final payment for said system or sub -- system shall be due.
The warranty period for such equipment put into use, unless warranty has
- already begun, shall commence concurrently with the use of the equipment for
Created by Motorola Western Dimwit S/ PAGE 19 Propnetary and Confidential
n r J
ver 10 STATEMENT OF WORK 10/7/99
FOR
City of El Segundo
• its intended purpose (other than for the express purpose of training or testing)
The use of the equipment for its intended purpose shall be deemed to have
occurred when El Segundo commences to use and rely on the equipment for
their communications
14. Final System Acceptance
The following process describes El Segundo's final system acceptance.
• Motorola completes this Statement of Work
• Motorola successfully passes a mutually agreed Acceptance Test
• Motorola resolves all punch list items
• Motorola issues a letter to El Segundo, certifying the total system is operating
in accordance with the test plan
• Within five days of the acceptance test passing, El Segundo will review the
results and sign the Final System Acceptance Document as "System
Accepted"
15. STATEMENT OF WORK APPROVAL
Motorola has prepared this document as the most current understanding of the
project scope It is an element of the contract and its content has impact at the
contract compliance level
This document has been reviewed and found to be acceptable for presentation
to El Segundo for approval
Motorola Project Manager- Date
Accepted and Approved
El Segundo Project Manager Date•
•
Created by Motorola Western Divnioa SI PAGE 20 Proprietary and Confidential
64
EXHIBIT B
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
R 65
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION EXHIBIT B
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN (ATP)
This document �s a comprehensiv�lestplan wnUenso meet - the part�sular-
requirements of City of El Segundo's new communications dispatch center radio
base stations and antenna subsystems to be installed and optimized at the Police
Department Dispatch Center Satisfactory completion of the ATP shall constitute
acceptance of the system for warranty purposes
Since time is of the essence on this contract, some explanation is required to
determine when the system is operational for acceptance purposes An industry
standard used for this purpose is "Customer Beneficial Use," or in some cases,
"Commercial Service." This standard constitutes conditional acceptance, which
means the primary system is functional and can be used for the purpose for which
it was designed It is understood that minor deficiencies that do not prevent the use
of the system may still exist, and that any such deficiencies will be corrected
through the punchlist process
Once the above conditions have been met, the system shall be accepted, the
warranty started, and no further penalties shall be levied. Punchlist items shall be
prioritized according to seventy of impact. The priority levels are defined as
follows
++
Priority 1. Materially affects user operation
•: Priority 2 Presents difficulties to operators
•> Priority 3 Minor specification differences being corrected
++ Priority 4. Features quoted but not yet available
r Priority 5: Minor items of a cosmetic nature
Final acceptance shall occur when no Priority 1 or Priority 2 items remain Future
features will be billed as they become available. Minor items will continue to be
corrected under warranty maintenance.
Motorola is submitting this ATP to City of El Segundo before commencing
equipment installation. This ATP is designed to verify that system operation
includes the functionality and features outlined in the system description.
®MOroirou Motorola Confidential and Proprietary
A s9
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
0 Motorola proposes to use two testing procedure levels during the ATP-
0
a) Site Acceptance Test Plan
b) System Acceptance Test Plan
Site Acceptance Test Plan
The following procedures will be used during the site ATP:
1) All equipment on site will be accounted for and inventoried. This
information will be recorded and included in the system documentation
2) Motorola will verify that site installations meet or exceed Motorola internal
expectations and specifications.
3) Motorola has performed a fixed network equipment (FNE) quality audit at
the Police Dispatch Center, utilizing Motorola's stringent R56 standards. A
copy of the audit is provided to the City of El Segundo along with
recommendations to improve items under its direct control.
An outline of the site ATP follows.
Police Dispatch Center and Fire Stations
1) QUANTAR control Stations
2) Astro -TAC sidetone Receivers
3) Spectra Control/Base Stations
4) MCS2000 Control/Base Stations
5) Central Electronics Bank
6) Punchblocks
7) Equipment racks
8) Antenna subsystems
The Site Acceptance Test Plan parameters for the Police Dispatch Center and Fire
Stations are described in the following section.
©MOTOROLA
N
A 67
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST -- EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
Police Dispatch Center Radio Equipment Room and Fire Stations
QUANTAR Control Stations
Appearance of installation Pass Fail
Electncal cables dressed properly Pass Fail
Physical mounting Pass Fail
Astro -TAC Sidetone Receivers
Appearance of installation Pass Fail
Electncal cables dressed properly Pass Fail
Physical mounting Pass Fail
Spectra Control /Base Stations
Appearance of installation Pass Fail
Electncal cables dressed properly Pass Fail
Physical mounting Pass Fail
MCS2000 Control /Base Stations
Appearance of installation Pass Fail
Electncal cables dressed properly Pass Fail
Physical mounting Pass Fail
Central Electronics Bank
Appearance of installation Pass Fail
Electrical cables dressed properly Pass Fail
Physical mounting Pass Fail
©MOTOROLA
3
9
0
0
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
-- P-unchblocks
Appearance of installation Pass Fail
Feed cables dressed and tie wrapped Pass Fail
Cross - connect cables dressed Pass Fail
Equipment Racks
Appearance Pass Fail
Feed cables dressed and tie wrapped Pass Fail
Properly anchored Pass Fail
Ground connected to City of El Segundo Pass Fail
ground
Antenna Subsystems
Appearance Pass Fail
Jumper cables and lines dressed and tie
wrapped Pass Fail
Duplexer /circulator /multicoupler Pass Fail
modules properly anchored
Ground connected to City of El Segundo Pass Fail
ground
®MOTOROLA
0
. f;c)
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
• System Acceptance Test Plan
A test will be performed to verify that each radio station is functional Each station
-wilt-be tested-for transmitter frequency, moArttion deviation, receiver sensitivity,
wireline alignment, and forward and reflected power. Each antenna subsystem will
be checked for forward/reflected power. The dispatch console Acceptance Test
Plan (attached separately) will be performed to demonstrate the functionality of the
dispatch console feature sets The site Quantar control station receivers will be
checked for the presence of transmitter noise, receiver desensitization
System as -built documentation will be developed in three -ring binders and will
include the following information-
* Installation Drawings
♦ Equipment rack layout diagrams
♦ Room layout diagrams
Accountability/Inventory
•% Level Settings
. c• Functional Test Information
0
Operator's Manuals (Required end -user information manuals for the proper
programming of the Quantar stations wil l be included)
%% As -Built Drawings
%% Field Notes
City of El Segundo's written system acceptance will be based on the completion of
contractual obligations established between the City of El Segundo and Motorola
The system ATP describes how each major component in the system will be tested.
Major components are the dispatch console, radio base stations and antenna
subsystems.
The system acceptance test plan is outlined in the following sections.
®asorowor.A
5
A 70
•
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
System Acceptance Test Plan Outline -- Police Dispatch Center
and Fire Stations
Ouantar Control Stations, Astro -TAC Receivers, Spectra Control/Base Stations
and MCS2000 Control/Base Stations
a) Optimization
b) Perform Station Diagnostics
c) Transmitter Frequency, Power Output, Deviation Test
d) Receiver Sensitivity Test
Antenna Subsystems
a) Transmitter Duplexer hiput Power and VSWR Test
b) Transmitter Duplexer Output Power and VSWR Test
c) Transmitter Output Power and VSWR Test
d) Receiver Antenna Subsystems VSWR Test
e) Transmitter Noise/Receiver Desensitization Test for Quantar Control
Stations
Functionality Test
a) Field Radio Unit Radio/Dispatch Communications
®M0701VOLA
E
A71
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
• System Acceptance Test Plan Procedures
0
•
QUANTAR Control Stations, Spectra Control /Base Stations,
Astro -TAC Receivers and MCS2000 Control /Base Stations
Optimization
The Quantar control stations, Spectra Control/Base Stations, Astro -TAC Receivers
and MCS2000 Control/Base Stations will be optimized and programmed for proper
operating frequencies, CTCSS codes and other unique personality traits in
accordance with City of El Segundo's system. Station alignment and optimization
for the Quantar stations will be performed as described in Section 4 of the Quantar
Radio Service Software User's Guide
After antenna subsystem gains and losses are calculated to ensure the licensed
effective radiated power (ERP) is not exceeded, station power levels will be
aligned and set to the power output specified on the City of El Segundo's FCC
license
Perform Station Diagnostics
A complete complement of station diagnostics for the Quantar stations and Astro-
TAC receivers will be performed to verify the hardware and firmware are
functioning properly
Transmitter Frequency, Power Output and Deviation Test
Connect the transmitter output port of the Quantar, Spectra and MCS2000 stations
being tested to the RF input port of the Motorola R2000 series (or equivalent)
Communications Systems Analyzer For multiple frequency stations, choose an
operating frequency in the middle of the channel band. Set up the
Communications Systems Analyzer to measure frequency error for the frequency
under test. Key the station being tested and observe the frequency error on the
Communications Systems Analyzer. Dekey the transmitter and record data.
Connect a through -line wattmeter at the output port of each transmitter. Key the
station and observe and record the output power for each station. For the Quantar
®rorowou
A 72
0
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
and Spectra stations, set the wirelme -input deviation with a 1000 kHz modulation
input
®MOTOROLA
11
A 7
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
is Expected Results
0
Frequency error Not greater than 1 PPM This translates to a frequency
error not greater than 4'71 H% or the 470 MHz channels, or 510 Hz for the
509 MHz channels
s Minimum/Maximum Frequency deviation with Private Line +/- 3 kHz
minimum and +/- 5 kHz maximum
•: Power output: To be determined in accordance with the FCC license
Station/Name/Frequency
Frequency
Error
Wireline
Transmitter
Deviation
RF Power
Output
Quantar/PD Dispatch/473 3125 MHz
Hz
Hz
Watts
Quantar /TAC -1/473 6375 MHz
Hz
Hz
Watts
Quantar/PD -4/474 1125 MHz
Hz
Hz
Watts
Quantar/Fire Dispatch/509.0125 MHz
Hz
Hz
Watts
Quantar/Fire TAC /509 0375 MHz
Hz
Hz
Watts
Spectra/LA Mutual /487 0875 MHz
Hz
Hz
Watts
Spectra/Hermosa/473.1875 MHz
Hz
Hz
Watts
Spectra/Fire White /154 265 MHz
Hz
Hz
Watts
MCS #I /PD Dispatch/473.3125 MHz
Hz
N/A
Watts
MCS #2 /PD Dispatcb/473.3125 MHz
Hz
N/A
Watts
MCS #3 /PD Dispatch/473 3125 MHz
Hz
N/A
Watts
MCS#4/PD Dispatch/473.3125 MHz
Hz
N/A
Watts
MOTOROLA
EJ
A 74
62
0
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
Station/Name/Frequency
Frequency
Wireline
RF Power
Error
Transmitter
Output
Deviat34n
MCS #5 /PD Dispatch/473.3125 MHz
Hz
N/A
Watts
MCS #6 /PD Dispatch/473 3125 MHz
Hz
N/A
Watts
U 70AaoLA
10
74 75
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
0 Receiver Sensitivity Test
L�
C�
Connect the RF output port of the Communications System Analyzer to the receiver being
— tested—Connect-the speaker-outputto- the -VerUSINAD /DisVDVM/C�o—unter in jack -on the
Communications System Analyzer Set up the Communications Systems Analyzer to
generate a 1000 kHz modulated signal at 60% rated system deviation on the frequency
being tested and perform a 12 dB SINAD test on the receiver. Conduct the same test at
the input of the receiver multicoupler and record results
Expected Results
4% Receiver sensitivity for 12 dB SINAD will be 0.35 µV or less
Station/Name/Frequency
Receiver 12 dB
SINAD
Receiver Multicoupler 12 dB
SINAD
Quantar/PD Dispatch/470.3125 MHz
µV
N/A
Quantar/TAC -1/470 6375 MHz
µV
N/A
Quantar/PD- 4/471.1125 MHz
µV
N/A
Quantar/Fire Dispatch/506 0125 MHz
µV
N/A
Quantar/Fire TAC /506 0375 MHz
µV
N/A
Spectra/LA Mutual /484 0875 MHz
µV
N/A
Spectra/Hermosa/470 1875 MHz
µV
N/A
Spectra/Fire White/ 154.265 MHz
µV
N/A
MCS #1 /PD Dispatch/470 3125 MHz
µV
N/A
MCS #2 /PD Dispatch/470 3125 MHz
µV
N/A
11
A 76
•
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
Station/Name/Frequency
Receiver 12 dB
SINAD
Receiver Multicoupler 12 dB
SINAD
MCS #3 /PD Dispatch/470.3125 MHz
µV
N/A
MCS #5 /PD Dispatch/470 3125 MHz
µV
N/A
MCS #6 /PD Dispatch/470.3125 MHz
AV
N/A
Astro- TAC/Fire Dispatch/506 0126 MHz
µV
N/A
Astro- TAC/Fire TAC /506 0375 MHz
µV
AV
Astro- TAC/PD -4/471 1125 MHz
µV
µV
Astro- TAC/TAC- 1/470.6375 MHz
AV
µV
Astro- TAC/PD Dispatch/470 3125 MHz
µV
µV
12
ATry
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
_Antenna Subsystems
Transmitter Dupiexer Input Power and VSWR Test
Connect a through -line wattmeter at the duplexer input for each Quantar control
station transmitter Key the Quantar using the "XMTT" switch on the control panel.
Switch the through -line wattmeter to read forward power and observe reading
Switch the through -line wattmeter to read reflected power and observe reading
Dekey the Quantar and record readings
Expected Results
Reflected power will not be more than 5% of the forward power
Name/Frequency
Forward
Power (Pi.)
Reflected Power
(P,)
% P,
( %P, - P,/ Pi. X 100)
PD Dispatch/473.3125 MHz
Watts
Watts
%
TAC- 1/473.6375 MHz
Watts
Watts
%
PD- 4/474.1125 MHz
Watts
Watts
%
Fire Dispatch/509 0125 MHz
Watts
Watts
%
Fire TAC /509 0375 MHz
Watts
Watts
%
©MOTOROLA
13
A 78
11
Pi
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
Transmitter Duplexer Output Power and VSWR Test_
Connect the through -line wattmeter between the duplexer output port and the
antenna transmission line Selectively key each Quantar transmitter Switch the
through -line wattmeter to read forward power and observe the reading. Switch the
through -line wattmeter to read reflected power and observe the reading. Dekey the
transmitter and record readings. Also record the combiner loss in decibels for
each Quantar station from data collected in the previous input power test.
Expected Results
Reflected power should not be more than 5% of the forward power.
The transmitter duplexer power loss from input to output (less losses for test
cables) for each Quantar transmitter will be in accordance with the duplexer
manufacturer's specifications. Expected losses should be no greater than I.0 dB.
Name/Frequency
Forward
Reflected
% Pt
Input Power
Duplexer Loss
Power
Power (Pt)
(P,,, from
(10 log
(Pout)
( %Pr = p,/
input test)
Pout /Pin)
Pout X 100)
PD Dispatch
Watts
Watts
%
Watts
dB
473 3125 MHz
TAC -1
Watts
Watts
%
Watts
dB
473 6375 MHz
PD -4
Watts
Watts
%
Watts
dB
474 1125 MHz
Fire Dispatch
Watts
Watts
%
Watts
dB
509 0125 MHz
Fire TAC
Watts
Watts
%
Watts
dB
509.0375 MHz
8moroerou
14
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
9 Transmitter Output Power and VSWR Test
L i
•
Connect the through -line wattmeter between the transmitter output port and the
antenna transmission line Selectkey each transmitter Switch the through-line
wattmeter to read forward power and observe the reading Switch the through -line
wattmeter to read reflected power and observe the reading Dekey the transmitter
and record readings
Expected Results
Reflected power should not be more than 5% of the forward power
Name/Frequency
Forward
Reflected Power
% P,
Power (Pi„)
(P,.)
(% P, = P,/ P. X 100)
Spectra/LA Mutual /487 0875
Watts
Watts
%
MHz
Spectra/Hermosa/4731875
Watts
Watts
%
MHz
Spectra/Fire White /154 265
Watts
Watts
%
MHz
MCS #1 /PD
Watts
Watts
%
Dispatch/473 3125 MHz
MCS #2 /PD
Watts
Watts
%
Dispatch/473 3125 MHz
MCS #3 /PD
Watts
Watts
%
Dispatch/473.3125 MHz
MCS #5 /PD
Watts
Watts
%
Dispatch/473.3125 MHz
MCS #6 /PD
Watts
Watts
%
Dispatch/473.3125 MHz
®MOTORou
15
A R�)
•
•
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
Receiver Antenna Subsystems VSWR Test and Multicoupler Input Loss
Each receiver antenna subsystem will be checked for VSWR using the appropriate
transmitter on a temporary basis to record forward and reflected power levels.
Connect the through -line wattmeter between the transmitter output port and the
antenna transmission line where the line enters the equipment room Key the
Quantar transmitter Switch the through -line wattmeter to read forward power and
observe the reading Switch the through -line wattmeter to read reflected power and
observe the reading. Dekey the transmitter and record readings
Set up the test equipment to measure the input loss for each receiver multicoupler
port and record the results.
Expected Results
Reflected power should not be more than 5% of the forward power
Multicoupler input loss per port 0 dB
Antenna Systems VSWR Results
Receiver Multicoupler #
Forward Power
Reflected Power
% P,
(Pin)
(Pr)
(% P, = Pr/ Pi„ X 100)
#1 -470 MHz
Watts
Watts
%
#2 — 506 MHz
Watts
Watts
%
©MOTOROLA
16
A 8'
0
0
•
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
Receiver Multicoupler Input Loss Results— -
Multicoupler Port
Receiver Multicoupler # 1
Loss
Receiver Multicoupler # 2
Loss
1
dB
dB
2
dB
dB
3
dB
dB
4
dB
dB
5
dB
dB
6
dB
dB
7
dB
dB
8
dB
dB
®MOTOROLA
17
f} ' Z
0
i
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
Transmitter Noise /Receiver Desensitization Test
In the interest of cost savings to the City of El Segundo, Motorola has proposed the
use of multiple- frequency un- shielded stations (Spectra/MCS) to support channels
that are used less frequently For the primary Police and Fire radio stations,
Motorola proposes the use of Quantar stations which are designed to limit inter -
cabinet radiation and to reduce interference effects due to site noise.
The antenna subsystems for the Quantar control stations are designed to minimize
generated on -site noise /receiver desensitization at the Police Dispatch Center,
within the physical limits of the City of El Segundo's frequency spacing, the
antenna combming/multicouplmg equipment, and the available antenna mounting
locations. Motorola is not responsible for RF interference that may be generated or
received externally from other sites, to or from the un- shielded Spectra/MCS2000
stations, other radio equipment not provided in this proposal, or vehicular radio
equipment
An effective receiver sensitivity test will be conducted for the Quantar control
stations at the Police Dispatch Center and the levels recorded. Each receiver will
be tested for the presence of transmitter noise and receiver desensitization.
An effective sensitivity test will be conducted by connecting the RF output port of the
Communications System Analyzer to the each Quantar receiver being tested via an iso -
tee The iso -tee antenna input port will be terminated with a load. Conduct a 12 dB
SINAD sensitivity test and record the Analyzer signal level input. This level should be
approximately 30 dB greater than the 12 dB SINAD sensitivity level recorded in the
previous sensitivity test, due to the iso -tee isolation. Remove the iso -tee load and connect
the iso -tee input to the antenna system. Adjust the Communications Analyzer signal level
to regain the 12 dB SINAD reading and record this level The difference between the
signal levels with the iso -tee load connected and with the iso -tee connected to the antenna
system, is the degradation due to environmental site noise.
While the test equipment is set up as previously described with the iso -tee connected to
the antenna system, selectively key the other each UHF transmitter at the site and note any
degradation in the 12 dB SINAD reading on the Analyzer due to noise. If SINAD
degradation is noted, increase the signal level input of the Analyzer to regain the 12 dB
SINAD reading and record this Analyzer signal level. The amount of analyzer signal
required to regain the 12 dB SINAD reading is the amount of noise produced by
transmitter sideband noise or receiver desensitization.
Repeat these steps for each Quantar control station receiver.
®MOTOROLA
10
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
Environmental- Site -Noise
Quantar Receiver
A — SINAD level
w /iso -tee on load
B — SINAD level
w /iso -tee on antenna
Environmental Site
Noise (B -A)
470 3125 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
470 6375 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
471.1125 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
506.0125 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
506.0375 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
Quantar Control Station Receiver 470.3125 MHz Noise/Desensitization
Transmitter
B — SINAD level
C — SINAD level
Noise Degradation
w /iso -tee on antenna
w /iso -tee on antenna
(C -B)
and transmitter
keyed
473.6375 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(TAC -1)
474 1125 MHz (PD-
dBm
dBm
dBm
4)
509 0125 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(Fire Dispatch)
509 0375 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(Fire TAC)
©mo"ROLA
19
A 44-
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
• Quantar Control Station Receiver 470.6375 MHz Noise/Desensitization
Transmitter- _ _ _
B — SINAD level_
C — SINAD1eve
— Noise - Degradation
_ _
w /iso -tee on antenna
w /iso -tee on antenna
w /iso -tee on antenna
(C -B)
and transmitter
keyed
473.3125 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(PD Dispatch)
474 1125 MHz (PD-
dBm
dBm
dBm
4)
509 0125 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(Fire Dispatch)
509.0375 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(Fire TAC)
. Quantar Control Station Receiver 471.1125 MHz Noise/Desensitization
•
Transmitter
B — SINAD level
C — SINAD level
Noise Degradation
w /iso -tee on antenna
w /iso -tee on antenna
(C -B)
and transmitter
keyed
473 3125 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(PD Dispatch)
473.6375 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(TAC -1)
509.0125 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(Fire Dispatch)
509.0375 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(Fire TAC)
®MOTOROLA
20
,� R 5
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
0 Quantar Control Station Receiver 506.0125 MHz Noise/Desensitization
Transmitter
B_�SINADAeve1
--SINAD-level --
—Noise-Degradation
w /iso -tee on antenna
w /iso -tee on antenna
w /iso -tee on antenna
(C -B)
and transmitter
keyed
473 3125 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(PD Dispatch)
473 6375 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(TAC -1)
474 1125 MHz (PD-
dBm
dBm
dBm
4)
509.0375 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(Fire TAC)
• Quantar Control Station Receiver 506.0375 MHz Noise/Desensitization
0
Transmitter
B — SINAD level
C — SINAD level
Noise Degradation
w /iso -tee on antenna
w /iso -tee on antenna
(C -B)
and transmitter
keyed
473.3125 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(PD Dispatch)
473 6375 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(TAC -1)
474 1125 MHz (PD-
dBm
dBm
dBm
4)
509.0125 MHz
dBm
dBm
dBm
(Fire Dispatch)
©erorowou
21
A 86
•
C�
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
Functionality Test
Field Radio Unit/Dispatch Communications
A portable or mobile field radio unit will be used to test the functionality of each
radio station. The City of El Segundo will supply the field radio unit programmed
with the new channels to be used in this test. The field radio unit will be located in
an area of good coverage /audio quality. Two -way communications will be
conducted, field unit-to- dispatch and dispatch -to -field unit.
The Public Works and Chevron trunkmg station functionality can also be tested if
the City of El Segundo provides the necessary field unit radios.
®MOTOROLA
22
A87
0
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DISPATCH CENTER IMPLEMENTATION
DISPATCH CONSOLE AND RADIO BASE STATIONS
ACCEPTANCE TEST PLAN
Acceptance of Acceptance Test Plan
The following representative of the City of El Segundo hereby concur that to the
best of their knowledge and abilities the observations and/or measurements as
documented in accordance with the Acceptance Test Plan are accurate and correct
and, thereby, grant acceptance of the testing.
City of El Segundo Representative Date
Motorola Representative
®MOTOROLA
Date
23
EXHIBIT C
ENHANCED SYSTEM SUPPORT PLAN
A gg
EXHIBIT C - ENHANCED SERVICE SUPPORT PLAN
MOTOROLA ENHANCED SYSTEM SUPPORT PLAN
INTRODUCTION
Motorola places great-e-at on ensuring i afiiiis commumca�ystems—m—eet-Kgh
standards for design, manufacture, and performance When communications system failures do
occur, Motorola provides support to its customers through a network of service providers including
the System Support Center ( "SSC "), Motorola Authorized Service Stations ( "MSS "),
Dealer /Servicer /Preferred Subcontractors ( "Subcontractors "), and Company Owned Service
Centers ( "COSC ") for repair service The Motorola Enhanced System Support Plan ( "ESS ")
describes how repair services will be provided during the warranty period specified in your
Communications System Agreement with Motorola All services described in the ESS will be
provided in accordance with the terms of Motorola's Service Agreement and will cover only the
Equipment and Software specified on the Service Agreement Order Form
Enhanced System Support will only be provided for those communications systems which have
been staged at Motorola's Customers Center for System Integration ( "CCSI ") located in
Schaumburg, Illinois and sold through the Commercial Government and Industrial Solutions
Sector (CGISS) Enhanced System Support fees for the warranty period specified in the
Communications System Agreement with Motorola are included in the price of the
communications system Additional periods of such support may be purchased at Motorola's then
current rates Unless explicitly noted otherwise, the Motorola Enhanced System Support Plan
does not cover any non - Motorola software, non -CGISS software, Radio Service Software or Data
product software or those hardware items not specifically staged at CCSI that may be included
with the communications system
This Statement of Work provides a general description of how Motorola and the Customer will
proceed to perform the services presented Prior to system Acceptance, a Customer Support Plan
will be prepared jointly by Motorola and the Customer The Customer Support Plan details the
specific steps within the support process, and any Customer specific information
The Motorola Enhanced System Support Plan is comprised of the following services which will be
described in greater detail elsewhere in this document
Infrastructure Eoumment Services
• On -Site Infrastructure Repair Service
• Preventative Maintenance -SSC Scheduled
• Call Management
• Infrastructure Board Advanced Replacement
• Technical Support
• SiteSentry Remote Monitoring /Remote Diagnostics (Smartnet Systems)
• FullVision Remote Monitoring /Remote Diagnostics (SmartZone /OmniLink Systems)
Subscriber Eguioment Repair Service
• Subscriber Repair Coverage
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 1 Rev 04/01/99
•1,
EXHIBIT C - ENHANCED SERVICE SUPPORT PLAN
Software Services
Software Subscription Services
it---- INFRASTRU,CT -URE- EQUIPMENT SERV1Cf$ - -- — -
On -Site Infrastructure Repair Service
Description
Dispatch of technicians to Customer site(s) in response to Customer requests for
service
Motorola Responsibilities
• Repair defective Equipment which does not conform to Motorola's
specifications
• Repair defective Equipment which as a result of normal wear and usage and
gradual deterioration of components or drifting of levels Set appropriate level
settings and perform minor system adjustments
• On -site repair service will be provided during regular business hours which
are defined as Monday - Friday 8 00 AM to 4 30 PM local business time, excluding
holidays Emergency after hours service will be provided only for Severity 1
issues Severity One (1) is defined as a complete loss of communication to a site
Customer Responsibilities
• Provide full and free access to the Equipment
• Furnish shelter, heat, light and power at no charge
• Control temperature, humidity, and other environmental conditions in
accordance with the hardware manufacturer's specifications
• Cooperate fully with Motorola and provide all information pertaining to the
hardware and software elements of any system with which the Equipment is
interfacing
• Customer is responsible for any site defects including, but not limited to,
building shelters, heaters, air conditioners, fans, alarm sensors (smoke detectors,
hi -lo temp, entry, AC failure, etc )
• All equipment sites must meet or exceed Motorola's grounding standards
found in the R -56 Motorola Site Grounding Manual Costs associated with
meeting this requirement are the responsibility of the Customer
• Customer is responsible for all costs associated with any unusual method of
conveyance required to gain access to a service location and /or any fees by a
site owner to provide an escort
• Provide information required to complete the Customer Support Plan
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 2 Rev 04/01/99
WL
EXHIBIT C — ENHANCED SERVICE SUPPORT PLAN
Preventative Maintenance- System Support Center Scheduled
Description
Annual Preventative Maintenance ( °PM)4heck, onlhe- Equtpment/System --
Motorola Responsibilities
• Schedule PM visits through the System Support Center's Call Center, on an
automatic pre - determined schedule
• Inspect Equipment for compliance with Motorola specifications
• Retain PM records on file for quality control purposes
Customer Responsibilities
Provide Motorola with the preferred schedule to perform Preventative Maintenance
checks
Call Management
Description
Motorola's Call Center is staffed with trained Customer Support Representatives that
provide a central point of contact for all service requests (1- 800 -448 -3245) The Call
Center will receive all calls and dispatch or coordinate appropriate technical support
All requests are tracked and monitored from beginning to end through an electronic
Customer Service Request (CSR) number
Motorola Responsibilities
Receive Customer requests for service on a seven day per week/twenty -four
hour per day (7x24) basis
• Prompt for information necessary to understand the situation, open a
Customer Service Request (CSR) and determine the next steps to take
• Dispatch qualified technical resource and assign the CSR as required
• Notify Customer of technicians arrival at Customer's site (site arrival)
• Verify with Customer that repair is complete and system is fully operational If
verification by Customer cannot be completed within 20 minutes, the CSR will be
closed, and the technician will be released
• Ensure the required personnel have access to Customer information as
needed
• Notify the Customer when work is completed
• Retain records of Customer's Equipment, including performance history and
site access requirements
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 3 Rev 04/01/99
A 92
EXHIBIT C - ENHANCED SERVICE SUPPORT PLAN
• Provide period performance reports as defined in the Customer Support Plan
The Customer Support Representatives will monitor the progress of a CSR
and will escalate issues to Motorola Management as described in the Customer's
- customized CustornerSupport Plan - _ - — ---
Customer Responsibilities
• Provide Motorola assigned System ID number when placing a request
for service
• Provide information required to complete the Customer Support Plan
Infrastructure Board Advanced Replacement
Description
Replacement of defective Equipment with new or repaired equipment
Motorola Responsibilities
• Provide access to an inventory of equipment that can be shipped to
Customer's site upon request, subject to availability
• Ship Equipment via overnight carrier, unless otherwise specified Motorola
will cover shipping and handling during the normal operating hours of 7 00 AM to
7 00 PM CST Shipments outside standard business hours or NFO (next flight
out) are subject to an additional charge
• Verify and configure all equipment before shipping
Maintain past and current versions of firmware to ensure the equipment sent
to the Customer is programmed correctly Motorola reserves the right to upgrade
at no additional charge to Customer
• Defective Equipment may be repaired at the System Support Center (SSC)
and returned to SSC inventory for future use
Customer Responsibilities
Requests to ship equipment outside of the SSC's regular business hours of
Monday - Friday, 7 00 AM - 7 00 PM CST, excluding holidays, are subject to
additional charges
• Request must include model description, model number, serial number, type
of system, and firmware version
Provide Motorola with a Purchase Order Number when ordering equipment
(The Customer will not be charged for the use of the service and no invoices will
be processed against the Purchase Order unless equipment is not returned within
the time frames stated in the Terms and Conditions )
• Malfunctioning Equipment must be sent to the SSC within five working days
of receipt of the exchange equipment Additional charges may be incurred by the
Customer beyond that period
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 4 Rev 04/01/99
,A
EXHIBIT C – ENHANCED SERVICE SUPPORT PLAN
The malfunctioning Equipment returned to Motorola must include all
documentation originally sent by the SSC for the return, in order to ensure proper
tracking of the return
• —The- Customer is responsible -for return shipment -and - insurance charges
Technical Support
Description
Motorola will provide Customer technical staff with centralized telephone support for
issues that require a high level of Radio Frequency (RF) expertise or troubleshooting
on infrastructure equipment, on a seven day per week/twenty -four hour per day
(7x24) basis
Motorola's Responsibilities
• Maintain a database with the Customer's administrative and system
information, history of service and repairs, and current status of equipment
• Escalate support issues to other Motorola engineering and product groups, if
necessary
• Maintain its help desk lines on a 7x24 basis
• Maintain and have access to laboratory equipment for system simulations as
needed
• Work with the technicians in the field until a solution to the problem has been
found
• Coordinate technical resolutions with agreed upon third party vendor(s) as
needed
Customer Responsibilities
• Supply system information, type of equipment, model and serial numbers
Supply on -site presence when needed
• Approve any work to be performed
• Allow Motorola remote connectivity to equipment to facilitate diagnostics
SiteSentry Remote Monitoring /Remote Diagnostics (Smartnet Systems)
Description
Remote monitoring of critical communication Equipment on a seven day per week/
twenty -four hour per day (7x24) basis for single site communications systems
equipped with SiteSentry
SiteSentry is a Motorola product that utilizes Motorola's MOSCAD technology When
your single site communications system is equipped with SiteSentry, Motorola will
monitor critical components of the communication system on a 7x24 basis Additional
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 5 Rev 04/01/99
• E
EXHIBIT C — ENHANCED SERVICE SUPPORT PLAN
alarming of environment, third party devices, and site conditions can be provided at
an additional charge
Motorola Responsibilities
Verify alarms, reporting, and connections at beginning of contract, and
periodically thereafter
• Create a Customer Service Request (CSR) and dispatch Field Technician
when needed
• Disable and enable alarm system for local technicians who go to the site
when intervention is needed
• Verify repair of alarm
• Provide toll free number which permits alarm reporting to the System
Support Center
• Provide 7x24 monitoring
Customer Responsibilities
• Allow Motorola's remote access to system without notification to Customer
Allow local site technicians access to Equipment in the event that remote
restoration is not possible
• Provide use of on site PSTN line for connection to SiteSentry unit
FuliVision Remote Monitoring /Remote Diagnostics (SmartZone /OmmLink Systems)
Description
Remote monitoring of critical communication Equipment on a seven day per week/
twenty-four hour per day (7x24) basis for SmartZonelOmniLink communications
systems equipped with FullVision
FullVision is a Motorola product that utilizes SNMP protocol When your
SmartZone /OmniLink communications system is equipped with FuliVision, Motorola
will monitor critical components of the communication system on a 7x24 basis
Additional alarming of environment, third party devices, and site conditions, can be
provided at an additional charge
Motorola Responsibilities
• Verify alarms, reporting, and connections at beginning of contract, and
periodically thereafter
• Create a Customer Service Request (CSR) and dispatch Field Technician
when needed
• Disable and enable alarm system for local technicians who go to the site
when intervention is needed
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 6 Rev 04101199
A ��
EXHIBIT C – ENHANCED SERVICE SUPPORT PLAN
• Verify repair of alarm
• Maintain connectivity to system via a 56K dedicated frame relay link
— °rovid—e7x24 monitoring
Customer Responsibilities
• Allow Motorola's remote access to system without notification to Customer
• Allow local site technicians access to Equipment in the event that remote
restoration is not possible
III HOW TO OBTAIN SERVICE
To obtain service of the infrastructure system during the Enhanced System Support Plan period,
the Customer must call the Motorola System Support Center at 1- 800 -448 -3245 and identify
themselves by using their assigned System ID number, and providing the name of the caller and
Customer
Should a request for service not be covered by the Motorola Enhanced System Support Plan,
Motorola will contact the Customer and provide an estimate for the requested service The
Service Center will await authorization and a purchase order number from the Customer to
proceed with the repair If an emergency response, not covered by the Motorola Enhanced
System Support Plan, is required, Motorola will perform repairs which are necessary to minimize
downtime of the equipment, and will contact the Customer during the next business day to obtain
a purchase order number for the Repair
IV SUBSCRIBER EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE
Subscriber Repair Coverage
Descriobon
Motorola will provide repair services to the subscriber equipment listed on your
Motorola Service Agreement Order Form
Motorola Resoonsibilties
• Repair defective mobile and /or portable radios which do not conform to
Motorola's specifications as a result of normal wear and usage and gradual
deterioration of components
• Advise Customer of the approximate date the unit will be repaired, should the
unit require repairs beyond first echelon
• Notify the Customer in the event of repairs not covered by the Motorola
Enhanced System Support Plan ( "Above Warranty Repairs ") and provide quote
to repair
• Await approval from Customer in order to proceed with Above Warranty
Repairs
• Test units for proper functioning once repair is complete
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 7 Rev 04/01/99
A96
EXHIBIT C — ENHANCED SERVICE SUPPORT PLAN
Contact Customer by telephone when repaired unit is available for pick -up
Customer Resoonsibilities
�----Deliver Subscriber units -to- the- Authonzed Motorola Service provider at the
Servicer's location (indicated on the front of your Motorola Service Agreement
Order Form), during normal business hours, Monday - Friday 8 00 AM to 4 30 PM
local business time, excluding holidays
• Attach to each radio needing repair a tag with the following information
Customer information, department number if applicable, and brief description of
problem,
if known
Provide a purchase order number in the event of Above Warranty Repairs
V SOFTWARE SERVICES
Software Subscription Services
Description
Motorola will provide software subscription services as listed below for the Motorola
Software applicable to the upgrade capable Motorola communication equipment that
is in the Customer configuration identified on the Service Agreement Order Form For
purposes of these services, the following definitions apply
"Core Release" — A new version of Software which adds Features and major
enhancements These new versions are signified by changes to the first digit of the
version identifier number (e 9 SmartZone 2 0 3 to SmartZone 3 0)
"Enhancement Release" — A superseding issue of Software which adds to, improves,
or enhances the performance of Software Features contained in the then currently
shipping Software version These releases are signified by changes to the second
digit of the version identifier number (e g SmartZone 3 1 to SmartZone 3 2)
"Feature" — A Software functionality
"Standard Feature" — An additional software functionality for components of
Customer's system that is available to Customer in the standard software release
"Optional Feature" — An additional software functionality issued with a Core Release
that is available to Customer at additional cost
Motorola Responsibilities
Provide Customer notice bulletins announcing Enhancement and Core
Releases
Provide Software Enhancement Releases applicable to Features provided to
Customer by Motorola under this Agreement and as ordered by Customer from
the notice bulletins
• Provide those Standard Features included in a Core Release which apply to
Customer's existing system components
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 8 Rev 04/01/99
A Q7
EXHIBIT C — ENHANCED SERVICE SUPPORT PLAN
• Optional Features issued with a Core Release are not provided pursuant to
the Software Subscription Program but are available to Customer, as a Program
subscriber, at a discounted price under a separate agreement The discount
available to Customer for voice system Optional Features will be 20% off the
current- Motorola list price
Customer Responsibilities
• Customer must contact its Motorola representative upon receiving a bulletin
in order to receive Enhancement or Core Release
• Customer is responsible for payment of any charges associated with
additional engineering or hardware required for each Enhancement Release or
Core Release that it chooses to install Additional engineering may be required if
Customers system previously had specially developed options
• Contact a local service provider for installation assistance, if required
• Customer is encouraged to upgrade the Motorola software operating on its
system with the most current Enhancement and Core Releases If Customer
chooses not to install a new software release or enhancement, however,
customer acknowledges that by so choosing, it may limit or eliminate the
applicability of future releases or enhancements to its system
• Use the Software and releases in accordance with the terms of the Motorola
software license agreement executed by Customer, or Motorola's standard
software license terms, if no license was signed
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 9 Rev 04/01/99
EXHIBIT D
SERVICE AGREEMENT
M•
EXHIBIT D — SERVICE AGREEMENT
THIS SERVICE AGREEMENT is entered into by and between Motorola, Inc ( "Motorola ") and the
customer named in this Agreement's Attachments ( "Customer')
Section 1 DEFINITIONS
"Service Agreement" means this Service Agreement and its Attachments, "Equipment" means,
collectively and in part, the communication equipment that is specified in the Attachments or that
is subsequently added to this Service Agreement
Section 2 ACCEPTANCE
The terms and conditions set forth in this Service Agreement and in Attachments will become the
Service Agreement only when acknowledged and accepted in writing by Motorola's Schaumburg,
Illinois Service Department
Section 3 SERVICE DEFINED
A Motorola agrees to provide services for the Equipment as specified in the Attachments and in
accordance with the following standards (i) Motorola parts or parts of equal quality that are
new or are warranted as "like new" will be used, (n) the Equipment will be Serviced at levels
set forth in Motorola's product manuals, and (iii) routine service procedures that are
prescribed from time to time by Motorola for its products will be followed
B All communication equipment purchased by Customer from Motorola ( "Additional Equipment ")
that is part of the same communications system or of similar type as the Equipment covered
under this Service Agreement will be automatically added to this Service Agreement and will
be billed at the applicable rates after the warranty period has expired Motorola may also
provide additional services ( "Above- Contract Services ") at Customer's request that will be
billed at Motorola's then applicable service rates
C All Equipment must be in working order on the Start Date of the Service Agreement or at the
time the Equipment is added to the Service Agreement Customer must provide a complete
serial number and model number list either prior to the Start Date or prior to the time that the
Equipment is added to the Service Agreement and must indicate in the Attachments any
Equipment that is labeled intrinsically safe for use in hazardous environments
D Customer must immediately notify Motorola in writing when any Equipment is lost, damaged,
or stolen Customer's obligation to pay Service fees for such Equipment will terminate at the
end of the month in which Motorola receives such written notice
E If Equipment cannot, in Motorola's opinion, be properly or economically serviced for any
reason including excessive wear, unavailability of parts, the state of technology, or the
practical feasibility of the scope of Services as specified in the Attachments or Motorola
Statement of Work, Motorola may (1) modify the scope of Services related to such
Equipment, (2) remove such Equipment from Service Agreement, or (3) increase the price to
Service such Equipment
F Customer must notify Motorola or Motorola's Subcontractor immediately of any Equipment
failure Motorola will respond to Customer's notification in a manner consistent with the level
of service purchased as indicated in the Attachments
Section 4 EXCLUDED SERVICES
A Service does not include the repair or replacement of Equipment that has become defective or
damaged due to physical or chemical misuse or abuse from causes such as lightning, power
surges, or liquids
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 1 Rev 04/01/99
A 100
EXHIBIT D — SERVICE AGREEMENT
B Unless specifically included in the Attachments, Service does not include repair or
maintenance of any transmission line, antenna, tower or tower lighting, duplexer, combiner, or
multicoupler Motorola has no obligation or responsibility for any transmission medium, such
as telephone lines, computer networks, or the worldwide web, or for Equipment malfunction
caused by such transmission medium —_
C Unless specifically included in the Attachments, Service of Equipment does not include items
that are consumed in the course of normal operation of the Equipment, such as, but not
limited to, batteries, magnetic tapes, and computer supplies
D Service does not include reprogramming of Equipment, accessories, belt clips, or battery
chargers, custom or Special Products, modified units, or software
E Service does not include certification programs, software support, reprogramming, or
modifications to Equipment related to assuring the correct processing, providing, or receiving
of date data from, into, or between the year 1999 and the year 2000
Section 5 RIGHT TO SUBCONTRACT /ASSIGNMENT
Motorola may assign its rights and obligations under this Service Agreement and may subcontract
any portion of Motorola's performance called for by this Service Agreement However, any such
assignment will not relieve Motorola of its liabilities or obligations under this Agreement
Section 6 TIME AND PLACE OF SERVICE
Service will be provided at the location specified in the Attachments When Motorola performs
service at the Equipment's location, Customer agrees to provide Motorola, at no charge, a non-
hazardous environment for work with shelter, heat, light, and power and with full and free access
to the Equipment Customer will provide all information pertaining to the hardware and software
elements of any system with which the Equipment is interfacing that enable Motorola to perform
its obligations under this Service Agreement Unless otherwise specified in the Attachments, the
hours of Service will be hours of 8 30 a m to 4 30 p m , excluding weekends and holidays
Section 7 PAYMENT
Motorola will invoice Customer in advance for each payment period All other charges will be billed
monthly, and Customer must pay each invoice within thirty (30) days of the invoice date to the
Motorola office designated by Motorola Customer agrees to reimburse Motorola for all property
taxes, sales and use taxes, excise taxes, and other taxes or assessments (except income, profit,
and franchise taxes of Motorola) now or hereafter imposed on this Service Agreement by any
governmental entity Motorola does not by this Agreement make any price guarantees except as
stated in the Order Form
Section 8 WARRANTY
Motorola warrants that its Services under this Service Agreement will be free of defects in
materials and workmanship for a period of ninety (90) days beyond the expiration or termination of
this Agreement Customer's sole remedies are to require Motorola to re- perform the affected
Service or to refund, on a pro -rata basis, the Service fee paid for the affected Service
MOTOROLA DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP
Page 2
Rev 04/01199
n
EXHIBIT D — SERVICE AGREEMENT
Section 9 CERTIFICATION DISCLAIMER
Unless signed by a Motorola authorized signatory, Motorola specifically disclaims all certifications
regarding the manner in which Motorola conducts its business or performs its obligations under
this Seryw"greement —
Section 10 DEFAULTITERMINATION
A Customer agrees to provide Motorola written notice of any default of this Service Agreement
to state the nature of the default Noncompliance with regulatory laws or disadvantaged
business entity requirements may not be cause for default If Motorola does not cure the
default within sixty (60) days, Customer may terminate that portion of the Service Agreement
that is in default by giving Motorola thirty (30) days prior written notice
B Any dispute will be resolved by mutual agreement, C Neither party is liable for delays or lack
of performance resulting from any causes such as strikes, material shortages, or acts of God
that are beyond that party's reasonable control
Section 11 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
Upon expiration of the Warranty Period, as defined in the Communications System Agreement at
Section 9, this Limitation of Liability will commence Notwithstanding any other provision,
Motorola's total liability for losses, whether for breach of contract, negligence, indemnity, warranty,
or strict liability in tort, is limited to the price of twelve months of Services sold IN NO EVENT
WILL MOTOROLA BE LIABLE FOR LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF TIME, INCONVENIENCE,
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, COMMERCIAL LOSS, LOST PROFITS OR SAVINGS, OR OTHER
INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES TO THE FULL EXTENT
SUCH MAY BE DISCLAIMED BY LAW
Section 12 EXCLUSIVE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
A Customer acknowledges that this Service Agreement together with the Communications
System Agreement to which this Service Agreement is attached as Exhibit D, supersedes all
prior agreements and understandings, whether written or oral, related to the services
performed This Service Agreement or Attachments may not be altered, amended, or modified
except by a written agreement signed by both parties
B Customer agrees to reference this Service Agreement on all purchase orders issued pursuant
to this Service Agreement Neither party will be bound by any terms contained in Customer's
purchase order or elsewhere (even if it is attached to the Service Agreement) In the event of
a conflict between the main body of this Service Agreement and any Addenda or
Attachments, the main body of this Service Agreement will take precedence, unless the
Addendum or Attachment specifically states otherwise
Section 13 FCC LICENSES AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
Customer is solely responsible for obtaining licenses or other authorizations required by the
Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC ") or any other federal, state, or local government
agency and for complying with all rules and regulations required by such agencies Neither
Motorola nor any of its employees is an agent or representative of Customer in any governmental
matters
Section 14 OWNERSHIP OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
A This Service Agreement does not grant directly or by implication, estoppel, or otherwise, any
ownership right or license under any Motorola patent, copyright, trade secret, or other
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 3 Rev 04/01/99
EXHIBIT D — SERVICE AGREEMENT
intellectual property including any intellectual property created as a result of or related to the
products sold or Services performed under this Service Agreement
B Motorola reserves the right to limit access to its confidential and proprietary information
including cost and pncmg_data
Section 15 GENERAL TERMS
A If any court renders any portion of this Service Agreement unenforceable, the remaining terms
will continue in full force and effect
B THIS SERVICE AGREEMENT AND THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF THE PARTIES WILL BE
GOVERNED AND INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
C Failure to exercise any right will not operate as a waiver of that right, power, or privilege
D Except for money due upon an open account, no action may be brought for any breach of this
Service Agreement more than one (1) year after the accrual of such cause of action
E The Service Agreement will begin on the Start Date specified in the Attachments This Service
Agreement will renew, for an additional one year term, on every anniversary of the Start Date
unless either party notifies the other of its intention to discontinue the Agreement within thirty
days of that anniversary date
F If Motorola provides Service after the termination or expiration of this Agreement, the terms
and conditions and any prices in effect at the time of the termination or expiration will apply to
that Service
Customer
By
Name
Title ,
Date
Motorola, Inc.
By
Name
Title
Date
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 4 Rev 04/01/99
A 103
EXHIBIT D
SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
� � "4
EXHIBIT D - SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
This Motorola Software Subscription Agreement ( "Agreement ") is between Motorola, Inc, a
Delaware corporation ( "Motorola ") by and through its Commercial, Government, Industrial
Solutions Sector (CGISS) and El Segundo ( "Customer")
- - Sectron 1 UEFINtTIONS - - - -
CORE RELEASE A new version of Software which adds Features and major enhancements
These new versions are signified by changes to the first digit of the version identifier number (e g
SmartZone 2 0 3 to SmartZone 3 0)
ENHANCEMENT RELEASE A superseding issue of Software which adds to, improves, or
enhances the performance of Software Features contained in the then currently shipping Software
version These releases are signified by changes to the second or third digit of the version
identifier number (e g SmartZone 3 1 to SmartZone 3 2, Private DataTAC 2 0 1 to 2 0 2)
FEATURE A Software functionality
STANDARD FEATURE An additional software functionality for components of Customer's
system that is available to Customer in the standard software release
OPTIONAL FEATURE An additional software functionality issued with a Core Release that is
available to Customer at additional cost
SPECIAL PRODUCT FEATURE Features specially developed for Customer which contain
Customer unique functionality
Section 2 SUBSCRIPTION PROGRAM
During the term of this Agreement, Motorola will provide Customer with the software Subscription
services described below ( "Software Subscription Program ") for upgrade capable Motorola
communication equipment that is in the Customer configuration identified in Attachment A to this
Agreement Non - Motorola manufactured software, Non -CGISS software, and Radio Service
Software (RSS), are excluded from the Software Subscription Program
A Motorola will provide periodic Motorola Software Enhancement Releases applicable to
Features currently provided to Customer by Motorola under a Software License Agreement
Customer is responsible for the purchase of additional hardware that is necessary to upgrade
to the newly issued Enhancement Release
B Motorola will provide those Standard Features included in a Core Release which apply to
Customer's existing system components Customer is responsible for the purchase and
license of additional products, hardware, and /or software that are necessary to migrate to the
newly issued Core Release
C Optional Features issued with a Core Release are not provided pursuant to the Software
Subscription Program but are available to Customer, as a Program subscriber, at a
discounted price under a separate agreement The discount available to Customer for voice
system Optional Features will be 20% off the current Motorola fist price The discount
available to Customer for data system Optional Features will be 15% off the current Motorola
list price Once an Optional Feature is provided to Customer, Customer will be entitled under
this Agreement to all Enhancement Releases for that Optional Feature
D Special Product Features previously developed by Motorola unique to Customer's system
may require additional engineering effort to be incorporated into a Enhancement Release or
Core Release so that the Special Product Feature will not be overwritten upon its installation
Upon request, Motorola will determine whether a Special Product Feature can be incorporated
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 1 Rev 04/01/99
A!P15
EXHIBIT D — SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
into a Enhancement Release or Core Release and whether additional engineering effort is
required Customer will be responsible for all charges associated with any additional
engineering required for each Enhancement Release or Core Release that it chooses to
install Such equipment and engineering are not included as part of the Software Subscription
— Program -and- may-be-pmvided- Wsuant to a separate agreement — - -
Motorola will issue to Customer at the below address bulletins announcing Enhancement
Releases and Core Releases If Customer desires to obtain the announced Enhancement
Release or Core Release, it must contact its Motorola representative If needed, Customer
should contact its local service provider for installation assistance
City of El Segundo
348 Main St, El Segundo, CA 90245
Attn Brian Evanski
F Because Enhancement Releases may include minor performance enhancements, Customer
is encouraged to periodically upgrade the Motorola Software operating on its System with the
most current Enhancement Release (e g SmartZone 3 0 1 to SmartZone 3 0 2) Customer
may choose not to install a new software release, however, customer acknowledges that by
so choosing, it may limit or eliminate the applicability of future releases to its system
G Because the Software Subscription Program includes Enhancement Releases for only the
currently shipping software version and those prior versions that Motorola may be supporting
during the term of the Agreement, Customer is encouraged to migrate the Motorola Software
operating on its Communications System to the most current Core Release (e g SmartZone
2 0 3 to SmartZone 3 0) If Customer's system is not maintained to a currently supported
software version, all Core Releases and Enhancement Releases may not be compatible with
Customer's existing System Additional hardware, Motorola Software, and engineered
modifications may be required if Customer desires to migrate to a particular Core Release or
Enhancement Release Such additional hardware, Motorola Software and engineering are not
included as part of the Software Subscription Program and may be provided pursuant to a
separate agreement If the size and complexity of Customer's System warrants, Motorola may
provide consultation services to determine the technological, operational and financial impact
of installing a particular Core Release or Enhancement Release on the System, pursuant to a
separate agreement
Section 3 FEES AND PAYMENT
Attachment A contains the annual Software Subscription Program fees and payment terms The
fees listed are based upon Customer's current Motorola equipment configuration as indicated in
Attachment A Customer must notify Motorola promptly of any change in this configuration and
Motorola will calculate revised fees (effective at the beginning of the next subscription year) based
on the new configuration Motorola will refund to Customer any amounts previously paid for
Software Subscription Program fees that are reduced due to a new configuration If the Software
Subscription Program fees are increased due to a new configuration, Customer will pay any
additional amounts within thirty days after receipt of an invoice from Motorola
Section 4 TERM AND TERMINATION
A The term of this Agreement is indicated in Attachment A and shall terminate at the expiration
of that term unless extended by mutual agreement of the parties
B The Customer may terminate this Agreement at any time prior to the expiration of its term by
providing written notice of such termination to Motorola Such termination will be effective at
the next annual anniversary date following Motorola's receipt of the written notice Motorola
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 2 Rev 04/01/99
A 106
EXHIBIT D - SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
will refund to Customer any pre -paid Software Subscription Program fees for the terminated
period
C The Agreement will automatically terminate if, at its annual anniversary date, the software
version -in-Customer's then-current -configuration is no- longer supported -by - Motorola or if
Motorola discontinues the Software Subscription Program, in which case Motorola will refund
to Customer any pre -paid Software Subscription Program fees for the terminated period
Section 5 TAXES
Customer is responsible for all taxes due as a result of this Agreement, if any, other than taxes
based on Motorola's income, if Customer is a tax - exempt entity, upon execution of this
Agreement, Customer must provide Motorola with tax exemption certificates from the appropriate
tax authorities
Section 6 EXCLUDED SERVICES
The Software Subscription Program does not include repair or replacement of hardware or
software defects not corrected by the Enhancement Releases and Core Releases nor does it
include repair or replacement of defects resulting from any nonstandard or improper use or
conditions or from unauthorized installation of Motorola software
Section 7 OWNERSHIP AND USE OF SOFTWARE
All rights and title to Motorola software furnished to Customer under this Agreement remain
vested exclusively in Motorola Customer's use of such Motorola software is subject to the terms
of the Motorola software license agreement executed by Customer or, if no such agreement has
been executed, Motorola's standard software license terms apply, which will be sent to Customer
upon written request
Section 8 DEFAULT
Motorola at any time may suspend subscription services or terminate this Agreement if (a)
Customer fails to pay any fees within thirty days after such fees are due, (b) Customer fails to
correct a breach of this Agreement within thirty days after notice from Motorola of such breach, (c)
Customer's right to use Motorola software under a Motorola software license agreement expires
or is terminated, or (d) Customer replaces its Motorola communication system with a non-
Motorola communication system Upon such termination, any unpaid Software Subscription
Program fees will become immediately due and payable
Section 9 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
Upon expiration of the Warranty Period, as defined in the Communications System Agreement at
Section 9, this Limitation of Liability will commence MOTOROLA'S TOTAL LIABILITY ARISING
FROM THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF SOFTWARE
SUBSCRIPTION PROGRAM FEES PAID TO MOTOROLA BY CUSTOMER IN NO EVENT WILL
MOTOROLA BE LIABLE FOR SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES
Section 10 GENERAL
A NOTICES All notices, consents, and waivers permitted or required under this Agreement will
be deemed given upon receipt and must be delivered in writing to the below addresses
Change of address must be in writing to the other party
Contract No 99- 133281BKP Page 3 Rev 04/01/99
A10
EXHIBIT D — SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
Customer Motorola, Inc
Attn Attn Contracts & Compliance Manager
9980 Carroll Canyon Road
San Diego, CA 92131
B FORCE MAJEURE Motorola will not be liable to Customer for any failure to perform services
due to events beyond Motorola's reasonable control including labor disruptions
C ACTIONS Customer must bring any action under this Agreement within one year after the
cause of action arises
D WAIVERS No waiver of a right or remedy of either party will constitute a waiver of another
right or remedy of that party
E ASSIGNMENTS Customer may not assign any of its rights under this Agreement without
Motorola's prior consent
F ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT This Agreement, along with its Attachment A,
contains the parties' entire agreement regarding the Software Subscription Program and may
be amended only in a writing signed by both parties, except that Motorola may modify this
Agreement without joint consent as necessary to comply with applicable laws, rules, and
regulations
G GOVERNING LAW This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the State of California
Customer
By
Name,
Title
Date
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP
Page 4
Motorola, Inc
By
Name
Title
Date
Rev 04/01/99
A1(1fl
ATTACHMENTI
TO EXHIBT D (SSA)
�'r'9
ATTACHMENT 1 TO EXHIBIT D
SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
Choose and complete the applicable sections below*
I Private DataTAC System SSA
Number of Database Stations in Operation
Number of Network Controllers inOperation
Number of Data Devices in Operation (MW520, Forte, VRM Modems)
IP Messaging (Yes / No)
RNC Redundancy (Yes / No)
Network Management (Yes / No)
Mobility Management (Yes / No)
Security Services (Yes ! No)
II SmartZone System SSA
Number of Sites (in addition to the Prime Site)
Number of Repeaters in Operation
Number of Subscribers in Operation (Mobiles and Portables)
OmmUnk Operation (Yes / No)
Digital Operation (Yes / No)
III SmartNet System SSA (Single Site or Simulcast)
Number of Remote Sites (in addition to the Prime Site)
Number of Repeaters in Operation
Number of Subscribers in Operation (Mobiles and Portables)
Digital Operation (Yes / No)
IV Conventional System SSA
Number of Repeaters in Operation
Number of Subscribers In Operation (Mobiles and Portables)
Digital Operations (Yes / No)
Integrated Voice and Data (Yes / No)
V Console Only SSA (not required if System SSA is purchased)
Number of Operator Positions
Number of Channels
VI Centralmk 2000 USA
SSA TERM
Beginning of Term (choose one only)
Expiration of existing Subscription Period (renewal)
Immediately upon execution of Software Subscription Agreement
Other (please specify date)
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP
Page 1
Ten
Three
No
No
Five
Ten
Apply
Rev 05/01/99
A I10
ATTACHMENT 1 TO EXHIBIT D
SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
Length of Term (number of years 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5) One Year
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP Page 2 Rev 05101/99
111
ATTACHMENT 1 TO EXHIBIT D
SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
SSA PROGRAM FEES
Annual Fees
System SSA Fee
Console Only SSA Fee
CENTRALINK 2000 SSA Fee
SP Coverage Quote
Total Annual Fee
X1Yr
Total Annual Fee
Total Fees during Term Chosen
Payment Methods (check only one)
(A) Payment of total Fees due upon execution of SSA
(B) Payment of Annual Fee due upon first day of each subscription year
(C) Other (specify)
Contract No 99- 13328/BKP
Page 3
M030 00
$6,00000
$17,03000
$17,03000
Apply
Rev 05/01199
A II?
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
MEETING DATE: November 16, 1999
:NDA HEADING: Unfinished Business
Request for the City Council to authorize Staff to present a proposal to provide dispatch services on a
contractual basis to potential customer cities.
Authorize Staff to formally offer a proposal for dispatch services to potential customer cities.
On February 3, 1998, the City Council approved the design, construction and operation of a Public Safety
Communications Center. Additionally, Staff was directed to initiate discussions with potential customer
agencies for future contracted dispatch services.
To date, discussions have occurred on a continual basis with the City of Hermosa Beach as we share in
the utilization of the same Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and Records Management System (RMS)
software packages provided by the West Covina Services Group Staff from the City of Hermosa Beach
has requested that El Segundo provide a proposal identifying the services offered, as well as their
associated costs
The City of Manhattan Beach has in the past indicated their interest in contracting dispatch services from
El Segundo as well. This proposal offers police and fire dispatch services to the City of Manhattan Beach
on a contractual basis. Staff believes that Manhattan Beach would be a viable customer due to their similar
demographics, calls for service, and need to maintain continued interoperability and radio communications.
In April 1999, the City contracted with DMG Maximus to assist with a Customer Rate Study that would
provide potential customers a cost assessment and fee schedule based on calls for services. DMG
Maximus has completed their Cost Allocation Worksheet and Staff is prepared to present the information
to the Cities of Manhattan Beach and Hermosa Beach for their consideration with vour aooroval.
Staff report from Chief Grimmond to City Manager Mary Strenn
Improv. Budget: _
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance: Date:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
252 A
City of El Segundo
Inter - Departmental Correspondence
November 3, 1999
To: Mary Strenn, City Manager
From: Tim Grnmmond, Chief of Police
Subject: Proposal For Contract Cities
PROPOSAL:
It is proposed that the City of El Segundo make available an offer to provide public safety
communications and dispatching services for the Cities of Hermosa Beach and
Manhattan Beach This report will describe the operational standards for the Center,
as well as the proposal that assigns costs for these services on a contract basis.
BACKGROUND:
Following the recommendations of The Warner Group, on February 3, 1998, City Council
authorized to design, construct, and operate a Public Safety Communications Center.
The Council further directed Staff to initiate discussions for contracting with potential
customer/ agencies for future dispatching services. Since that date, the communications
center project has commenced and an approximate 5000 square foot addition is under
construction at the existing police facility It is anticipated that the facility, as well as
the entire project, will be complete and fully operational by June 2000
The concept of providing dispatch services to these cities has been included throughout
the development of the Communications Center Representatives from the Cities of
Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach have been continually updated on the status and
progress of the project. Information, recommendations and feedback have been provided
by these representatives and subsequently implemented into the plans. Concurrently,
as the completion date approaches, a specific proposal from the City of El Segundo for
contracting dispatch services for Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach public safety
operations is timely.
253
DISCUSSION:
Facility Design/ Planning
As directed by the City Council, plans for providing contract dispatch services to
contracting agencies have been included during the design and development of the El
Segundo Public Safety Communications Center The following items have been
incorporated in the facility design and furniture/ equipment purchase plan for the
inclusion of additional agencies
1) Square footage for multi - jurisdictional operations
2) Communications Equipment Room with space for expansion
3) EOC /Training Room for multi- agency operations and meetings
4) Supervisor's Office to accommodate multiple shift supervisors
5) Five (5) fully equipped consoles with Radio, Telephone and Computer Aided
Dispatch (CAD) capabilities
(a) Voice Radio Console system capable of operating multiple channels
(b) E9- 1- 1Telephone system capable of managing multiple jurisdictions
(c) CAD system utilizing the West Covina Service Group CAD Software
6) Eight (8) Furniture Workstations fully wired for all equipment components
7) Telephone "Ring -Down" capabilities for multiple locations including off -site police
and fire headquarters.
8) Voice Logging Recorder with a channel capacity for multiple public safety
organizations
Operational Management
Operational Management of the Communications Center has also been considered on
a multi - jurisdictional and multi - discipline level The necessity for superior police, fire
and emergency medical dispatching services among all municipalities is highly
recognized The need to accommodate the demands of the Users has been taken into
consideration during the development of this management and staffing proposal.
In order to accomplish a successful "Customer - Based" dispatching system, it is
recommended that representatives from the Police and Fire Departments participate in
the Policy and Procedural Management of the Center The establishment of an
independent Executive Board and User Committee can achieve this type of management
practice The Executive Board and User Committee are desirable for discussions and
proposed recommendations relating to general procedures and written policies, as well
as equipment and /or software needs
254
It is recommended, however, that a sole Manager be placed in charge of the day -to -day
operations of the Center.
The following organizational system has been conceptually drafted to meet the
requirements of these recommendations.
El Segundo Public Safety Communications Center
Organizational /Manatement Chart
El Segundo
Chief of Police
Executive Police Board
Police Lieutenant
Records(Communicaoons Manager
Technical Support Services
Maintenance/Repair
Dispatch Supervisor
Dispatcher
Dispatcher
Dispatcher
Duspatcher
Dispatcher
Dispatch Supervisor
Drspacher
Dispatcher
Dispatcher
D�spatcner
Dispatcher
Dispatch Supemsor
Dispatcher
Dspatchar
Dspatcher
Diapatcher
Part -Time
Orepatcher
Part -Trine
Dispatcher
Fire
Errecuhve Fire Board
The Organizational/ Management Chart identifies the hierarchy of the Communications
Center Division. As indicated, a Police Lieutenant will be the single Manager of the
Center The Lieutenant shall receive direction from the El Segundo Chief of Police and
Fire Chief
The structured chart further identifies the placement of the Executive Boards and User
Committees The Police and Fire User Committees, comprised of Police Lieutenants and
Fire Battalion Chiefs respectively, provide recommendations and input specific to field
operations These recommendations are presented to the Police and Fire Chief Executive
Boards The Executive Boards shall discuss the issues forwarded and take action as
necessary If the items or recommendations remain in dispute, final decisions will be
left with the El Segundo Chief of Police or the El Segundo Fire Chief for issues respective
to their disciplines
�5c
Contract Assessment
The City of El Segundo has contracted with DMG Maximus to provide a fee schedule for
contracting agencies based on calls for service and overall use and workload placed on
the dispatch center. Operational Costs will be assessed in direct relation to the
contracting agency's amount of use. Refer Cost Development Worksheet.
Construction and equipment expenses have been identified and are included in the
assessment as a "Facility Use" and "Equipment Use" charge, each is assessed with a
depreciating value Refer Cost Development Worksheet.
The El Segundo Public Safety Communications Center will provide contracting agencies
with specific communications services at a direct cost to the requesting agency These
services include, but are not limited to, Mobile Data Computers, User Radio purchase
and maintenance, Radio infrastructure maintenance, and Special -Event Dispatching.
The Contract assessment includes the following basic services utilizing the West Covina
Services Group CAD /RMS system and a UHF Radio backbone.
• Call Taker - 911 telephone calls
• Dispatch - Public Safety entities (Police, Fire, Emergency Medical)
• Dispatch - Non - Public Safety entities (Parking Enforcement, Animal Control,
Public Works, etc)
"56
D
v h
d Z
E O
aV
d O
O
u �
_ Q
1 W
o ~
�U
my
U) O
W
dU
_T 2
v�
U
2
O
Q
U
O
J
J
Q
J
Q
Z
LL
?57
m
u!
O
f
O'
Or
OC7
O
O
O1�
ON
m
H
e
e
e
e
e
o
3 E
o
o
o
o
o
o'
2 b
U
N
e
a
o
e
o
e
ro E
o
0
0
0
o
o'
2
N
7
U
0
0°
o
e°
Al
o°
p
d
2 W
7
U
°
o
d
r N
nN
1-coo
E d
N M
N
N N
N CT
N`
N
e
m
N
of
i
e O
a 0
a
e N
o m
a
P!
A
r
BOO
NO
N7
10 a0
Yi
V
w L
O m
@ Y
M M
MC
Mr
c")r
t7 O)
M
ID
�m
O
o R
e R
o �ct
e h
e N
e
r
G
O^
O^
Ou7
aoG
m�
a0
eD1_
1
co
c
C
V O
V
V a
V N
a
c
N
<
tO
W
�
t�
t o
N
to
C
O
w
r
N
�
r
F
o
o
o
o
o
o
N
m�
O o U
m°
O)
cp U
m°
O
o U
m°
T o U
m°
o U
m�
cp U
Of c h _
O
d
.
d
d
..
V
0 U
0
0 V
0 U
0
0
U 0 U
O
c
O
Q 2
2
a
Q 2
2 a 0
2 a
2 Q
m
� <
a
a
¢
a
m
d
0
0
0
0
0
`o
o
Q
m
N
m
V
2
=
j
O
CL
N
c
a
U
d
m
V)
J
d
U
C
C
N
oo
ip
v
O
p
d
?>
$
1-
U
m
CL
=
m
LM
O
N
(n
W
u
LL
?57
m
u!
O
f
O
LU
W
LU
m 2 =
E O
Y
c O O
J
MJ
u ¢ F
1 W Z
W
aw a
�U O
d N J
N O >
W 1= W
o¢ D
r V �
vg O
� V
0
U
Y
f
f
N
H
O
n
d
2 N
U
m
2 n
7
U
`w
E
02,
Z
U
m
O A N
N
a
O
O
o
V
O
m E
W
vi
N
c
M
N
r.
c
N N i
I
�
N N
Z
O
0I
d
W
m
U
�
N
r
�
O
U
�
c
d
O1
N
9
C
N
m
v
ay
U
E
Lr
ami
a
v
t
L
>
U)
N
N
W
m
IL
O
O
?58
m
0
d
m
m
0.
N
�X
Q
Ur
) w
LU
/( §
■
CL §
k§ \
�
k k
LLI §
�k k
k
LU
§
�
§
�
j
LU
§
,B
■§-
u
|E
,$.
2
)f_
u
,..,,,
,
-�-
CD 00 m
/
2r
`�� `®E°
2
3r
/
=m
v to co 0
j
` w
n C
\l
0
eaee»aae
tq
)a
�
2
}
k
z
&
}cr E!
a
= a n
IL�
§
ƒ)
\�k\j)§
m
0 LL
ow
J
If@�
/§
_! ?§�;|
,c■5
\■am
f
}k}(krJ0
\®\|)
3
5k3 /o0
a
\! §§
- {
k|§i|=
CL
0 F7
0 E
0 0 a)
j
LU
§
259
LO
cm
a.
k
2
k
,|
;/_
,|
2/.
|E
Z/-
.
.
.
-�-
CD 00 m
/
2r
`�� `®E°
2
2
(k( §\kK§
0
eaee»aae
tq
E
2
}
k
&
}cr E!
a
= a n
IL�
§
ƒ)
\�k\j)§
U)
0 LL
3) & (D
J
If@�
/§
_! ?§�;|
,c■5
EcL
)))§ U s?
}k}(krJ0
259
LO
cm
a.
k
2
k
p
N w
W
c 2 W
O
Y
o O O
ct
dJ 3
O q
ao uj Z
W
JD Ul a
�U
O
N N J
y0 i
w F- W
O q D
U 0
� U
O
U
z
z
W
a
CF
CF
w
2GO
m
O
`o
cn
OI
d
a
N
D
_i
0
d
m orn
Z m
U
`m
O N
Z in
7
U
4)
d
E
d 0 r
z a
7
U
. .
d
m$cn
z N
V
d
Eo N
Z h
7
U
0
d
; E
d r
Z N
7
U
O Q O �
O O
Co
Q
' O
d U
0 0 fDMO0
W r
O
O
C O
O `6 m� r— h(V
r
r C O
of
H
4U
v
m+
HQU
m
o 0 0� e o e oR o�
�
00000<O (O tD
Cm C
N N N N N
C tm1
a
c
00.nin00 00
*'
t,
O d
o
m
g y
U
•V 'O A
0 L m
L
ate=
c
N
O
G
O
0 0 0 0 0
O O O u 7 O . O O
N
► t
ID
^ 0h7
C
�U
�.n-�
N
E
FO
Q
2�
d
N
N
LO d
d
t
U
U
; 0
d
o
O
m
CO
m
T
d 2
a
c
m
rn m EY
0
E
aai o
U o - 3
d to
o
i
w
p
a
cn y
°�L�
o
w
d
a
o�
m > c=
v
am
m
F
d
„
d
i.c H CL m
m
m
c
U
p
U moo d LL
d
p
c
d x
H
W
tmn
d d Fd- O d 1L
_c
OC V
L C j C
ac.
d
d
(D
`e
c
4) E 44)
'E it
d
E
d C= r L 7 C
N U LL A
m
E
d d
r >>
CL 0. CL c
E (n
n
Q
d E E O.� U
N N
'�
N
L
W
_
W F U U Q p 02
O,
W
...
W O
2GO
m
O
`o
cn
OI
d
a
N
D
_i
0
\ -
rk j
k
m/ §
k§ \
co
U) §
>k §
�§ §
\ °
28!
(
IT
ID
/
k
2
k
��-
■)
`k_
z]
■K
2 \�
co
m
r
\o
to
<
0000000
(DC,000
00
ƒ`
0
k
�W.
Jm
m
`�
§a
§
§
>
\
/
) '.
!
/ 0
) f
.
�\
®�°
K4) ®
]§
U.
\ \k
u /}\k
-
\)
£ 0
\7;)
\)
!
40
%$$! |
kOZ
Ea 0
,�2eI
@$
�
§
` "�
�)�\m
- ;okra
k»/
2)
\[\k�
c!
f
\ m a
2( \k
Mak)\
§w
!
<neo=eo
§A3G �
oI
28!
(
IT
ID
/
k
2
k
} LU
.� CO
}\ k
CLk LLI
k§ \
/\ )
/k §
�§ q
■ o
8
J
§
2
tu
0
�2-
||
�/.
,/�
.
J/0
Fm
k
-
}
\§�
J r
Cl) a
.
"
0
!
)\,
/
E 2
)
§
}
f
E
z�
() 0
%/k
L)
0
/
000
k
{
U.
_
m
a
i
in
\
a
M/£
k
/0
/
)J§
2
tu
0
,R,
(
/
k
2
k
J0
J
■k
Z2_
!!`
G
.
J/0
Fm
k
3
\§�
0
E 2
§
}
f
E
k
() 0
%/k
L)
E2�
000
,R,
(
/
k
2
k
O
� N
O Z
E g
t
CL U
d J
o
a�
O
z U
� y
N O
W
o U
tJ �
g
0
U
U)
W
U)
CD
Z
O
Q
U
0
J
Q
263
5Wr.
O
r
cn
D
g
C7
O
_M
O
W
6)
I+
CD
OD o
00
Q
.0
cr)
to
Om
0
O
.-
G O
�
L
Q�
C
t"1
0
O
Z
N
3
U
N
O
G N
O
Z
N
U
L
Z
E
N
O
U
NO
co
O)
h
In o
V
o)
N
M
m
m
El0
m
Q7
r
.-
r
vi N
a
mm
c
r
co
0
h
v> o
t
�
N O
m
d
M
N
M M
c
�m
O
U'�
N
0
co
r
N
41 ,
�
M
ci
d
m
w
R
O
N
�
N
~
Im
NCD
m
v
2
c
O
V
C
O
W
U
O
N
a
Y
cu
E
_
Q
_
O
a
N
u
ca
a
C
w
�o
v
263
5Wr.
O
r
cn
D
g
C7
O
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 16, 1999
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Committees, Commission and Boards
AGENDA DESCRIPTION: consideration or the re -naming
Grand Avenue to the El Porto jetty, `EI Segundo Beach'
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Discussion and possible action, and
2 Direct staff to proceed with appropriate documentation to California State Lands Commission for
official naming of El Segundo Beach
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: On August 26, 1999, the Planning Division received a
letter (dated August 10, 1999) from Richard A Croxall and Elyse Rothstein, of the EI Segundo Chamber
of Commerce This letter requested the City Council and Recreation & Parks Commission to consider
renaming the stretch of beach extending from Grand Avenue to the El Porto jetty from Dockweiler State
Beach to 'El Segundo Beach
Upon receipt of this letter, Staff researched ownership and the possibilities of re -naming the beach
Staffs research indicates ownership now belongs to the State Lands Commission and that the approval
of re- naming the subject beach area lies within theirjunsdichon
On September 15, 1999, Mr Croxall presented this proposal to the Recreation and Parks Commission
and received its unanimous support to proceed to the City Council for irs approval
Staff note In attached copy of letter dated March 14, 1955 !loin the City of LA, Department of Recreation
and Parks, their board approved the naming of Dockweiler Beach which only spans hom Ballona Channel
South to El Segundo The area in front of the refinery is not part of Dockweiler Beach.
DISCUSSION: Specific research attached indicates that Initially the beach area was owned by Southern
California Edison and the Chevron refinery. A discussion with Mr. Dean R. Smith from the Los Angeles
County Department of Beaches and Harbors reveals that ownership actually belongs to the California
State Lands Commission According to Mr Smith, Chevron was the previous owner of the beach until it
relinquished its ownership rights when d accreted (or expanded) the beach Apparently, Chevron
expanded the beach unnaturally by pulling permits (i.e., grading, dredging or other similar activities)
several years ago, which resulted in the ownership reverting to the State Lands Commission Mr Smith
indicated that the State Lands Commission would most likely not object to the city naming the beach,
however, at the time this report was written, no contact with the State Lands Commission could be made.
The 1985 Automobile club map indicates that the portion of the beach from Grand Avenue to the Chevron
groin was named El Segundo Beach, however, the beach south of the groin to the El Porto jetty is
unnamed Mr Smith further indicated that the County Department of Beaches and Harbors staff has
referred to the beach as the 'Beach in front of the Chevron plant' and it has also been called `the beach
at Grand Ave'
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1 Letter from Richard A. Croxall and Elyse Rothstein dated August 10, 1999
2 12 page fax from Richard A Croxall
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget: Capital improvement Budget:_
Amount Requested:
ProjectiAccount Budget:
Project/Account Balance:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required: YES NO
Greg Johnson, Director of Recreation and Parks
Jim Hansen, Director Economic DevelopmerdAnterim Director of Plan. And Buildina Safe
Ire 5
10 August 1999
El Segundo City Council
El Segundo Recreation & Parks Commission
Subject. Renaming El Segundo Beach
Dear Council Members and Commissioners'
The purpose of tins letter is to request your consideration for renaming the stretch
of beach extending from Grand Avenue south to the El Porto jetty in previous
years, notably the early 1970's to the mid 1980's, many maps of the local beach
area, including the American Au$omobnle Association and some Los Angeles
County maps among others, labeled that stretch of beach "El Segundo Beach"
Some maps show that stretch of beach within the El Segundo City lunits
More recently, the beach had no name or was shown as an extension of
Dockweiler Beach, which is state owned and operated. Recent research by
Supervisor Don Knabe's office uncovered L.A. County documentation which says
in part that "Dockweiler Beach is a state owned and operated public beach", and
"El Segundo Beach is owned by the Edison Company and Standard Oil of
Califorrua"
We have found no reasons, objections, or obstacles to renaming the beach through
Supervisor Knabe's office and further research through the EI Segundo City
Manager and Planning Department offices It is the position of the Fl Segundo
Chamber of Commerce that renaming the beach would further enhance El
Segundo's image as a beach city and a member of the South Bay Community
Our suggestion to icname the beach has the support of the offices Supervisor Don
Knabe, Representative Steve Kuykendall, Assembly Representative Debra Bowen
and State Senator George Nakano We therefore request your consideration to
officially name the stretch of beach from Grand Avenue south to the El Porto jetty
"El Segundo Beach The E1 Segundo Chamber of Commerce is in support of the
process
Sincerely,
Richard A Croxall, Chamber Of Commerce Government Affairs Committee
Elyse Rothstein, Chamber of Commerce President _
V
AUG 2 61999
?65
J J
ZO'd 0689 ZZ£ Or£i .00IWWHO opun6ag L3 190 =b0 66- 5Z -6"V
JUL -19 -99 MON 1623 TO DSD FAX NO. 3108146231 P.02
Jul-07-00 10 :21i4 C1 Segundo Chamber
January 22, 1999
1310 322 6880
BOARD OF SUPERVTSORS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
822 KSHNM HAHN MAAk OF AOMIMSTAATION I IDS ANGEUX CRLIFONNM VWQ
Tvlwh x12171974-4 R I rAR i2/J1926.99st
DUN KNA.BE
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
SIIPFRVISOR, FOURTH DISTRIGT
Ms. Janet Hurd
Fxecutire Director, El Segundo Chamber of Commerce
427 Main Strut
P.02
wkAaklr W IM ROARO
rA ORIA MOAM A
T�UNMk RRAfMwMn RVRRt
IFV rARDf1AVSKr
M" RNAR,
MKMAf b AN10NOv,C.1
FI Segundo, 90245
Dcar lord:
For yo tnformahon, enclosed is It copy of information mate) Ial outlining the history of the
naming o I Docktvcitcr State Beach
The qucstion arose at the Government Affairs Committee meeting at the Fl Segundo C:hambcr of
Commerce. To bast assist, my office directed our County I3epartment of Reaches and Harbors to
resc.TSCh the issue with the State Parks and Recreation Agency_
in the ovent further questions should ensue, please do not hesitate to contact me or my local
South Day deputy, Mr. Tom Martin at (310) 222 -3015, or Mr (Jean R. Smith, at the Department
ol'Bcsu hcs and 11arbm at, (310) 305 -9573. We are happy to offer any further assistance that
you may need
ID6 cly,
KN ABE
Chairman of the Board
Supervisor,l,ourth District
County of Los Angeles
DK-lr
hnclosurc
�ss
JUL -19 -99 MON 16:24 TRD DSD FAX NO. 3108146231 P.03
Jul -o� -9Q lo:xeA El Seoundo Chamber 131fl 322 6f.�60 P.03
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT OF 6iACHES AND HARNORS
ifAN W"N ewm
00090W
as moomma
C"MF MK"
December 31, 1998
To: Tom Martin, Deputy
fourth District_ n
FRon. Dean R. Smith a ►�[jfJ(
Executive Assistant
SUSJSCT! MRIM OF RG SvGVH00 DCAM
An l Informed you on December la, 1998. Ay contact at State
Parks and Recreation is still researching this matter. He
called again on December 29 to inform me that' the
department's "historian" in Sacramento wan still trying to
find out how Isadore S. Dockweiler State Boubb was named.
He also said that, outside of beaches owned by $tat* Parka
and Recreation, he is net aware of any law or regulation
governing the naming of a beach. If the section of beach is
within the City of 12 Segundo, but not part of either
Dockweiler or Manhattan State 9each, then the City Council
ought to be able to name the beach, I have a call in to an
attorney with the State Lands Commaeeion, in Sacramento, to
rind out If she anow9 anything about the naming of beach** on
State Lando.
Greg Noodell has stated that, according to the "General Plan"
for Dockweiler State Beath,-Isadore B. Doekweiler was,a Statp
Parks and Recreation Commissioner. he I learn mote, I Will
keep you informett.
DRS: be
FNf• 17101171 �
(710170M17W 171]7 FW Nb17 MMMt O[t qFY f� IFCI,1}.k!/{!�!
MRERNET. Mm'Nrrwrmlaw.wM1Ndr
267
1UL -19 -99 MON 16:24 TRD DSD
ti
FAX N0, 3108146231
P. 04
JUI -07 -99 10:28A El Segundu Chamber 1310 322 6sso P.04
i DOCRWEILE54�n SEGUNDO BRACH
1. The Facility_
A. Isidore B. Dockweiler Beach is a State owned, Depart-
ment of Beaches operated public beach. It has, 3.7
miles of ocean frontage. Parking is available for
11400 cars. Available facilitieR are restrooms,
showers, playground and volleyball facilities , firt+
pits and the bike path runs along the entire length
of the beach. It is a fine swimming beach with good
surfing at several locations.
B. E1 Segundo Beach is owned by the Edison Company and
Standard Oil of California and operated by the Depart-
ment of Beaches. It has .9 miles of ocean frontage
with a bike path connecting it with Dockweiler State
Beach and the South Bay. It has parking for 150 cars.
E1 Segundo is an excellent swimming beach with an area
north of the pier reserved for surfing. The beach has
no permanent structures.
2. Acreage - 282
3. Contractual Obligations A. Dockweiler: A Joint Powers Agreement between the City
of Los Angeles and the County of Los Angeles for the
remainder of the existing State agreement. The Joint
Powers Agreement has a 3G5 days' notice clause for
termination.
B. E1 Segundo: An operating agreement was entered into
in September, 1972 between the County of Los Angeles
and the owner of the property: Edison Company and
Standard Oil of California_
4_ Activity (Calendar year 1981)
A. Attendance - 21530,960
B- Rescues - 307
C. Additional statistics refer to Attachment "A"
5. Cost (Fiscal year 1980 -81)
A. U;Ceruards $513,193
B. Maintenance 221F,418
C. Parking Lots 51,335
D. S & S 108.794
Total 9897,740
6. Revenues (Fiscal Year 1980 -81)
A. rarki,ru; Lots $226,346
- L -
?68
90 -d
90 'd
0
I
d
0
s
Y 0
J 1 --
� 1 .
a
A T
j[nt
'V
r pyt�J
1
Q
a-
i
€
270
0909 ZZE -Oi£S L3 VSL=OL 66-40-1 ^C
[£7,96[80t£ 'ON XHd asa au 92:91 NON 66- 61 -1fll'
JUL -19 -99 MON 16:26 TRD DSD FAX NO. 3108146231 Pr07
Jul -07 -99 10:29A El Segundo Chamber• 1310 3ZZ bkP3G
LOS ANGELES CO 'j i • .- NAP
,UnIR^ nttttrinr s anw wart „ r •x ,dxsl -• ' �t� 3. to
Uwe alt 5
Rwr. e7
Ir _b �' L \� �•� !ap ..'.l iF'`.3:!i: 6�w��,.ar+T.W �_a' -_ -1.: s•KIC P e '�
r] JS tr P3 1
�icv tnawxaw w^- .;
li trC '1 S .,+✓ � \ >, % \ a . W yy ^ r Y jR aIIFq 1
IS © r•il air.:rM`'- ' .n�i'r ;� �'ra•� w wr:CM, phi` '•�T� /.� ..'C
� T a1Js mi a� i -.•` ^--- rLdrf�N "'rr�!'�r!. •• �' '
J� 'rrW �+ \)` x., ` � Iota^ aW =)fit r.■ � _ t� ''?"' y '. ^e
�r•S e() �' - I r "tr•4; <•m`: ir- YlJ[[Y' tl EII a' f V I .y •'1_J
le
pr
S A\ • u J W IN Yr \. ' � ��;e y,....•.'' --t •_ "•' Jw ",'�.: � t .oa-r1 r,•
`■ �•Y4 R\ r `, I ; ' \` Td1.� 1A I.
7 S�+) -- yV:. I S i � iat v'`i a• ~i ^ "waenl f■ OA
IN
It. IOtIMI �.•_�
l� .; : I t_�Y
It '^ I— I• : �l.r - . llSGnriA w
r
K � 'n
�
I k Yt
wNrMf" ^ -AAAAAA =A } j 1. t i-Y Imo•
w 1. T. Q '♦.. i'' n :�d'la? ♦' x > r r`t°ly't .i_Jti a l
Gin, 1 ♦1 -
O ;ZFpy I W� .rI�VW'T. Rr A , •_- w,l +Ira 1' ' .ti,Ml4♦
3 Jt .",y�il rc + • 1` _J " I w _ oil
I, •`r11Mn - 1 ^ 1 I� f1d,�1 e.
V i ;r I r i� K��= �'Ll. \ h� ��,iy'i ,�•• No��
C m ai -- '�uaJw w lW } N '--L lll 1 ♦ L� jb �w ,.Y'�.�J[• •� y�tt lr1'-
tl i 'x!r -i i x • �G I - I I I —.
i< 'r 7i� • •• ` 'f , '•�•�' y t 'L I�
; t; -f"' ' F'. y4 `•y s a�
•1'rf t. -�'I - w r �.x, I'•h'r) r I W 4.4
II a [t` :� .i ii t' 1a � !'����'�' '♦ta's +�� i+wl N �
1 � .■ I !t .. ]�atar� � °a I 'C •?x lrt "+. �� � - ' O
o' .t: IIIOW_ r Il
I
ONE MIIMIMJ (IX
An f8► �► t}I► till QFN #R alt llpfi $�! !�1 (i►� pD
27;
JUL -19 -99 MON 16:26 TRD DSD
FAX NO. 3108146231
.1ul -07 -99 10;74A El Seflundo Chamber 1310 322 6880
01714 %YV 1mtI VV 1V FAA 31V oeL VJ45, LAW OLmO a ne"
01113/1999 1a ;Q2 91618686165 DPR ANGELES DIST HD4
YMCE- Hfr=OX ARU RBlA=
XSIWRR B. DOODIEMM BACK STATE PARK
P. 08
P. 0a
Id VVa
pA[s`E 0�
><t tbw January awaking of the State Park Cemadssimn, a resolution vas passed
a,zignating the Vwnice-kypwriee Beach . a at the 2eieiora B. Dockveiler Beach
State Park. Sorvint as a
State Park Ceaa,issioner from
August 1799 to Pebrmar7 19117,
M. Doekxailer brought to the
Cemmi,asior. an vaurual back -
grpTDed of eocperience in lngal
and civic affairs, and wee
known as one of the autetwndiriq
"It-itas of Lao Adgeles.
P3osers Henr and Mar ;arena
Dohhwsiler arrived o.n :ml
Ange3es rn 1852 when tbAT.
great city was little were
than a hamlet. ZsSdare hunted
rabbits and squi.rrnle iii the
area dew !crown as N=kwr 11M.
He reeedved an A. B. deRryw
in =1 as one of the first
gradnatea of St. Vincent's
College (now Loyola uni-
versity) and an A. D. from
the 'Game institution tvo yoa.ro
later.
R• Ptvdied law with the farm
of Anderson, P- ,tageraid and
Andareon, end uae admitted to
the Calaioroia Bar October lh,
ka".
Im 1491 he married oortrads Ragusa of San ?rancieco_ She died June 12, 1937•
the inpocuble autaway moat, stmped trousers and carnation Wttoiaielre, which
Dockweller always wore, ware a CaliSornia political trademark. His political
aarear begfra in 1084, when DorWeiler organized the "Cleveland Cadets" to
march in a toreblight proeession an behalf Zr the presidential mandt"cLe of
Grove CloveJgV4 . In 1902 he van a Democratic eandxdste for LxvAtaeant Gover-
nor, and in 1908 , vas a dalapata to the Democratic National Cauventi,on wench.
noainated William JeaaLags Bryan. Frog 1976 Nmtil 1932 he served a- a member
or thm Democratic X&T.Johal Con uttee. Re aided J,n the elections or two
Democrat= 8r+madents, Woodrow Wilson and ffrankltn D. Roosevelt.
Doekwealer's long devotiom to the Cstholic religion was rewarded in 1924, 'When-
Pope pius 31 named kiln a Shlght of St. Gregory. ME investature harm by Arch -
bLShoo Cantwell was an lArressive eeclwslastiral event of that yerer.
Thu poreonow1 of the stotw Perk S7mte,, arc grataRtl that a state park can be
named after a native Cali.foreasm of the ataturo or rfidore B_ Dmckpwllar.
Hui#VN r- r-rTFzk`- F--E- cno-v5 FIL-r - O97 - y14 / " U -/(-r &Ar- CGK0440Vj
pNe_Y P)tPE4Z. fN F! LE-. MtGC"oM_' Y0N0- L[ LiNItNDWA/
?72
JUL -19 -99 MON 16:27 TO DSD FAX N0. 3108146231
P. 09
Jul -07 -99 10:30A El Scggunde Chamber 1310 322_ 686
01i14 /99 Illy ea•lu }A} 31U a1'i 8335 r.aW eta (c aeKb Q P.09
B: X13/1999 19! 42 attlpAablbS 1pR AN.;MES OIS7 HDO htJ w9Y
Pa[g O2
71 A/ AL- r,3 E%/ FA A-L tfiU fOR� TO Lk- %a671 -*:Vl— 14
w• . � a
eobwhtecoom bon dwwai6MM and spWdltabn. A16900 the seavaita of the 9m'M PRA
octettmad, me p ��rri., dp(�i do lowmaha a Morizon occaRl4 is The tb udboww" 1oA17R
is msht vonewca avid *0 dewcame s Plant raillatio 1, 1N addaim, homing =4 aoarkto e
tsaaeae an4cit im also Woresad as etportapr ebnsome diftle WbssaonceaombL tb Late llonum
olua4a n tip0 e9lainodoa of an adaptwe b"a o a ocehssed is an soldoo RMUM who kfto-a"M
of lad ml-ral tj - - Wopabeoa dssnty. awlv ecomplowly, ft d1wors tyt and five of to halCSacton
aPherwa wrote s8nifiaety arraadbxd.
Cured WASWY
In 1893, More C. Waft ineodaced 1be plies fa tie development of -rqn Bellew.' iba Protons rite Of
Marla Del Rey harbor. Astrutironats m wuq m baas6xaal haphaet+av beap{3+tthsSntsr Fe RaUresd a
Sint new all but into Pmt Behan& A4tt a vaq* swarm ceased MNO*etalde hdtmwpa to Wdela' ahhaf
to 1109, Stns Fs doodoned iw T4* of way.
Ion l9@, the M ... ; y 1 P M. Amen as PblyaDed Roy, meaning 'lhp lan's Basch.' Bff" to etwtrn
now dewdopmaa pmjo= such at a nm rN lion, the Dal 8asy Bold and Ted and soverel am
Mritb ve racbC to hedged peast ew as Meese in do sea's Popoildly. Beery taornh -. bow"or. once
&pia alwdod tae am: ebe MW *a dwgiirbed by due tabs led obe Pswwaim burled donut In l9n,
the Didgna and Gillespiha CoWarshm one I i ' Most of *a shso8e whhm oho anon. Saes 6ftua tot.
Playa Del Rory was zonated by the Car of Im Ang".
On Mmcb 10. 19.15, tae Sean Park zed Ramadan an Cocomho n "Ww qtr %mar's aanea — formaiy
knows es -Moon+eoee BMW — m neekwctlff Bels Stave Park is honor; of a f9cebet member of doe
Spin Pack and Rserestm Co>aiseicut, lsiset B. Doakwe37a. the same was %owed is 1961 to
bmaw Do*Weder State Berry. the Les A%Idm C9ty Dolwatows of Receewioa and pwiix openaad
the faalitr adeil 1976. Siare 1976, dw C oody M Los Atgdw Depsrmaet sdBrsdes and $oxbows bas
oper:zd and romandand Doekwoder Sears BpeA by agresmes tsldt Ihs State Depam«me of Path zed
Rhrneabws.
23 ARSiEMC R8SMXCW
Tam aorbttie rwarea of Dodmeibt Sera Beach are pacsmd as a► arteptsttoe of esuaazl mmai as
Well as the peupod solorprotodim aaads by s beach obswa. Sae prajM sesa p9plasEi bout r0old r
and aelstlws teasase s Which may tapRBrtte b be overall arpainxe for xis Wwh olserver.
Several location as Loekwtalts offer Wounw lar Acm of the baaea and Sion Monica Bay. One of the
Paway nuts P"M b locaoed an tb WWR at V-M= Del War and wwarviaw Swot Rlave 3). 8eaaese
the natural bhtffs at Um" 7W in 900 fm ft9m chute: gad nppwaimaeely 2010 35 fax above aeon lewd,
risibility of *a IMM Monica Mumtaiw ad Mabbu ate heady winvoced partiadaiy so a dear day
LnaRmt soetti, date bomb. iho Bay, and the pilot Veda Penhoula can be am Was the dtWa sand an a.
2be herb nwho ass a comlldermat zaws at laodwp46. the Psvmilaw ad skteoom laodsrap d
artat W49du thin Mum shaaarce, *a Raertameal VeNkle Cmgvtuawd, the GO& z"wnom, and OR
Yalaae Cops coacco ien and rearoem+ arts. Abboso the beach powco x w+sal pdaltdwe ove6 be
tremors, toe ProtepCu d htawhraAiwe><ese�aps mN• diasiDieY 168 aysail srleoai 09ed@y of doe voat. Thu
fdlewml tesmtta ate coos deed as seaatire impam:
is
273
JUL -19 -99 MON 16:28 TRD DSD FAX NO. 3108146231 p,10
�j
a
Jul -07 -99 10e304 El SO
VgU"dn rhanmaY 1310 322 6880 P.10
U1114/bb TNU YY:11 VA1 .1d bZ1 9345 (ASV BCBS a BBRS P o ®001
e:'1Hi1e99 1B•aZ B1HeB86165 DPR ANGOLM DIST FDp
118 '
In order that the Pacific Telephone and Telegrapb Compssy may
place their lines underground at the Old Custom House State
Historical Monument and t1mreby improve the scenic Value or the
monument. St was moved by CoaeA ssloner Faabh that Agreement
between the State of CaliTOrnia and the southern Pacifia Coe/DRny,
for the laying of underground telegraph and tclaphonv li�+es, be
approved %n aacordanee with recommendations of stalT, Seconded
by Commissioner Whitney and approved.
C"AMACA RANCHO STATE TAmK: Staff presented Sor
approval revised master plan and proposed staff building of the
San Diego City - County Camp Commission- It was moved by Comiss-
ianer Xaseh that Reviaed Master Plan Me. 1 and Staff Building.
Plan Of the San Diego City - County Camp eosmisoion, at Cuyamaea
Rancho State Park, be approved, in ateordanee with map and plan
dated November 18, 19$4. Seconded by Co scioner Whitney and
approved.
MID= j_DOCRWEIL$R REACH STATE TAnK. ChieT Drury
advised that Un Los Auaeles City Park and Playground Coamtission
had approved the naming 'of the Isidore $_ Deskweiler Reach Statc
Park, and that aetion by the Los Angeles City Council In not
necessary. Staff was instructed that those minutes show that
the letter has been received by the Chief; that the letter be
Incorporated herein and that these minutes Show the statement
that it is net necessary to have the approval or the Lee Angeles
City Council in the naming of the beach.
16 --
I
M1W % —Ct-:5 OF TKE Cktt -60 L (A 31 0"9'� Pk�i� CDMMIsSw�/
r
274
JUL -19 -99 MON 16;28
TO DSD
FAX NO. 3108146231
P.11
.3ul -07 -99 10:30A
El Seguntlo
Chamber 1310 322 6880
P.li
- 01 /14 /09 THU 08:11
FAX 310 IZI 6345
lAC'O 9(:a1 4: Ie:A4
WOOS
0X/1,3/1999 18:41
8189806165
DPR RMIELES DIST MW
paw 05
section from Ballom OhA5= l south So EI Segundo.
It should be voted that a portion Of tbia .beach at
f-U sf_4 lklpd
The letter is no follows:
ciW OF LOS ANGEL=S, CALIFORNIA
Depsrtmeat or Recreation and Parks ,
309 City U11,
Los Angeles 17
"Arch 14, 1955
Mr. Newton B. 'Drury, Chisr
Divtgion of Beaches and Parks
721 Capitol Avenue
Sacramento 14, California
Dear Newton:
You had i.tfmrmad we that the State Park Comission
had under oonsidevatiaa the timing of the State -
owned beach at pei Rey in honor of the late Isidore
B. Dookweller, rorsar steamer or the State lark Com-
=:Laasoe and far many years an outstanding citizen
of Lee Angeles and the Stati'Of Calif Ornia.
TAe $sand of Recreation and Park Oosslisalmers
considered this proposal at its meeting On March 10
and autnorised me to advise 'you that the Board would
consider the naming of this beach most appropriate,
and that it would have tie Ojeotion to 'taking rorme.1
action thereon by the State Park Comsdiasion.
;
The Board concurs In your suggestion that thv por-
tion of the beach. to be so nosed consist of the
section from Ballom OhA5= l south So EI Segundo.
It should be voted that a portion Of tbia .beach at
f-U sf_4 lklpd
the northerly end is not yet acquired by-the State
but is In first priority according to the Master
� vQOVVp "'tr
Plan, and Sa marked for aaq%asition in the Five
1KGwDC— 7=S)
Year Plan or the State Park, Commission-
31nceTal'y yours,
Or% woo ,
�0
(Original signed)
-!;DQW
verge RJalte
RA:EP General Manager
MP�vti(+�rMq
Air Nail
CARMEL RIVER BEACH VMS PARK. Chief Drury presented
for approval the rev2aed deposit agreeaent of the Point Lobos
League and Resolution No. 1417, amending Resolution No. 1285, of
.. IT
*A1
JUL -19 -99 HON
16:29 TRD DSD
FAX NO. 3108146231
P.12
Jul -07 -99
_ vI110tY9
10-31A E1 Se undo
M, ur:12 FAX 311) ai a7f5
Cham6 @r 1310 322 6!380
iAGV 0gt5 i R9R5
P. 12
aekina.permission to place a bronze plaque in the Deekweiler
Reach State Park, honoring the late Isidore H. Doaxweilmr. It,
fd OYs
81/1e:1999
19: ■2 0199806165
DPR 445SIS DIST FAR
P� V6
v. old St. Vincent's Reunion. It wits moved by Commissioner
e
Carrillo that the request 'Or Mr. Christy Walsh, relative to the
a
IL26
n
be approved. Seconded by Commissioner Naseh and approved.
b,
0
DoCMmrL$R WACR STATY PMK. Mr. Covington presented
letter of Mr. Christy Male!+, referred by Commissioner Carri110,
S
aekina.permission to place a bronze plaque in the Deekweiler
Reach State Park, honoring the late Isidore H. Doaxweilmr. It,
wan especially requested that thin request lff approved prior to
June 6, 1955, so that the plaque Might be in place on the date
t
v. old St. Vincent's Reunion. It wits moved by Commissioner
e
Carrillo that the request 'Or Mr. Christy Walsh, relative to the
a
placing of a plaque in the Isidore B. Dookwailer Beach State Ptr%
n
be approved. Seconded by Commissioner Naseh and approved.
b,
Los A1jGgn= COV TT M49TSR MW - Lease Agreement,
at
Mr. John R. Leach, Chief, Management Division, Chief Adminie-
ti
trative office, and Mr. P. M. McLaughlin, nsaistant Field Depv:;,
Al
Fourth Supervisorial District, County of Los Angeles, mppcarwd c
b1
presented order of the County Hoard ar Supervisors of the Counts
V
Los Angeles, authorizing their appearance here and asking that W
to
Master Lease between the County of Los Angeles and the State of
f.
California, relative to beach lands acquired by the Stare and
tt
eperatea by the County, be paraded to provide as- J701Iows-
34
1. That the lease may be canceled only by
D1
mutual agreeement on the part or both
parties thereto;
wf
2. That the County of Loa Angeles shall ne
reimbursed for any capital laprovMentis Maas
during the period of the lease_
h=
The gentleman discussed this matter briefly, stating that the
of
County Hoard of Supervisors would like an-answer on this request
/k
-- 24 --
0
?7C,
r
�D 3R im P
OM
Rap
A °m a Q8 ESJ9��g�mm� +o:;sS88g
R
C m
�g 'o o'm� n m `�Sa��m grti >t>i oinii�Op Oyu�Z
� �m � 3 o f <mmv �A'�MM
n uii m o p CZ
AM oil 3 SrS
� N
n �
IT
Z m� T Nq JNNmI W W NVfJ 01 N�
N b O p J b V b N b b V at N m b
— � OfN � Na1W W a1 a1 V � tp W Lal bJm V
m O(° W +LON 0 Qt T O +OIV 4tVNW Or
A yN
W
m
\ O
O O O
N x s x
a w a p
m g gm >O>
O O >O r
>y >(f Z
S F S 2
g O
9
A
A
Q
W
Z7� 6
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER
10/2211999 THROUGH 11/05/1999
Date
10/22/99
10/25/99
10/25/99
10/27/99
10/27/99
10/27/99
10/29/99
11/1/99
11/3/99
11/3/99
11/4/99
11/4/99
11/4/99
Payee Amount Description
Wells Fargo
Wells Fargo
IRS
Employment Development
Health Comp
Federal Reserve Bank Kansas
Wells Fargo
IRS
Employment Development
Health Comp
Wells Fargo
IRS
Employment Development
DATE OF RATIFICATION: 11/16199
TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE:
Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by
45,000 00
30,000 00
4.73907
45788
1,76035
200.00
20,000 00
145,339 40
27,486 77
1,67568
30,000 00
398.33
5377
307,111.25
Deputy Treasurer T� I I k A `l
Date
Finance Director r A*—A 1"4q it
Date
City Manager
2&.,k -- r
Date
Workers Comp Trf
Golf Course Payroll Trf
Federal Taxes Special Payroll
State Taxes Special Payroll
Weekly eligible claims 10122
Emp Bonds PR9
Workers Comp Trf
Federal Taxes PR9
State Taxes PRO
Weekly eligible claims 10/29
Golf Course Payroll Trf
Federal Taxes Termination
State Taxes Termination
307,111.25
Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of Ell Segundo
^7R
MINUTES OF THE
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 3,1999 - 5:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Gordon at 5:00 p.m
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Council Member Kelly McDowell
ROLL CALL
Mayor Gordon
- Present
Mayor ProTem Jacobs
- Present
Council Member Wermck
- Present Arrived at 5.05 p.m
Council Member Gaines
- Present
Council Member McDowell
- Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of 550 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalfof
another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council
Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250
City Attorney Mark Hensley announced potential litigation with the South Bay Regional Public
Communications Authority, pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c).
MOVED by Mayor Pro Tem Jacobs, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to add the potential
litigation with the South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority, pursuant to Govt Code
§54956 9(c), to the CLOSED SESSION Agenda MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING
VOICE VOTE: AYES: MAYOR GORDON, MAYOR PRO TEM JACOBS, COUNCIL
MEMBERS MCDOWELL AND GAINES. ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER WERNICK 4/0/1
CLOSED SESSION: The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including
the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, et jM.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real
Property Negotiator; and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation;
and/or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with the City's
Labor Negotiators as follows-
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a))
Chaney v City of El Segundo, LASC Case No BC 207453
Stier v City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 034617
El Segundo v. Stardust, LASC Case No YC 031364
David Venegas, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al, LASC Case No. BC 207136
Hill v El Segundo, USDC Case No. CV 98 -1463
In re Michael Langley, Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission No. 98 -229.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956 9(b) -3- potential cases (no further
public statement is required at this time), Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c) -4-
matters
DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) — None
o7r
L 7
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957.6) — None
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) — None.
REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION - None.
ADJOURNMENT
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
"o0
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 3,1999 - 7:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Gordon at 7:00 p.m.
INVOCATION - Pastor Julie Elkins, United Methodist Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Council Member Kelly McDowell
PRESENTATIONS —
Mayor Gordon announced the Household Hazardous Waste Roundup will be held from 9 00 a.m. to
3 00 p in on Saturday, November 13, 1999 at Raytheon Corporation, Parking Lot G at Hughes Way off
Sepulveda Boulevard
Council Member Gaines presented a Commendation to Airport Unocal 76 station for its civic contribution to
the community by volunteering to participate in the used oil recovery and recycling program
Ron Green, Director of Public Works announced Clean-up -Week, November 8 — 12, 1999.
Joe Harding announced the continuation, on November 13, 1999 from 8:00 a.m to noon, of the
Beautification of El Segundo Together project, known as The BEST Day," and Certificate of Recognition to
Art and Patnce Lester for exemplifying the volunteer spirit of El Segundo. Council Member Wernick
presented a commendation to Art and Patnce Lester for volunteering their time and matenals.
Council Member McDowell presented a Proclamation to kick off the eighth year the El Segundo Fire
Department has joined the Los Angeles County Fire Department's Spark of Love Campaign for toys and
food items to be donated during the Holiday Season to children who otherwise might not experience the joy
of Chnstmas
ROLL CALL
Mayor Gordon -
Present
Mayor ProTem Jacobs -
Present
Council Member Wernick -
Present
Council Member Gaines -
Present
Council Member McDowell -
Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of S50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalfofanother, and
employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a
misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of 5250
Peggy Tyrell, resident, spoke regarding the master tree plan
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 3, 1999
PAGE NO 1
,. 41
f
Dorothy Kent, resident, spoke regarding the Plaza design. She stated that Council should be listening to the
residents not hired outsiders. Also spoke regarding the Noise Abatement Committee budget, and money
budgeted for the El Segundo School District not being accounted for by the District.
Frank Wong, resident, requested copies of back -up documentation for all Shute, Mahalley and Weinburger,
invoices and charges. He further spoke about how El Segundo is fighting the LAX expansion, and how the
money is being spent.
Mayor Gordon requested that Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger be invited to attend a December Council meeting,
and give a briefing on what is being done regarding LAX and cargo expansion plans
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only
MOVED by Council Member Weriuck, SECONDED by Council Member Gaines to read all
ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS
VOICE VOTE. 5/0
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS -
1 Public hearing on Environmental Assessment EA492 and Precise Plan 99 -1 (Seventh
Amendment to PP 12 -77) related to outdoor dining and parking. Address. 2041 Rosecrans
Avenue, 831 -871 South Nash Street (Beach Cities Plaza). Applicant: Continental
Development Corporation
Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a Public Hearing on
Environmental Assessment EA-492 and Precise Plan 99 -1 (Seventh Amendment to PP 12 -77)
related to outdoor dining and parking. Address: 2041 Rosecrans Avenue, 831 -871 South
Nash Street (Beach Cities Plaza) Applicant: Continental Development Corporation.
He asked if proper notice had been done and if any written communications had been
received. Clerk Mortesen stated that proper noticing had been done and no written
communications had been received
Interim Planning and Building Safety Director Jim Hansen gave a brief report.
Council consensus to close the public hearing
City Attorney Mark Hensley read Resolution No. 4139 by title only.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - 492 (EA -492) AND
ADOPTING THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT (PP 99 -1) TO THE BEACH CITIES PLAZA
PRECISE PLAN 12 -72 (PP 12 -72), AT 2041 ROSECRANS, AND 831 AND 871 SOUTH
NASH STREET. PETITIONED BY CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 3,1999
PAJ ff
MOVED by Council Member Wernick, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell, to
adopt Resolution No 4139, Approving Environmental Assessment - 492 (EA -492) and
adopting the Seventh Amendment (PP 99 -1) to the Beach Cities Plaza Precise Plan 12 -72 (PP
12 -72) at 2041 Rosecrans, and 831 and 871 South Nash Street. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510
2. Public Hearing on a proposed Specific Plan ( "Aviation Specific Plan") Development
Agreement, and amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Code and Zoning Map to change
the existing Land Use Designation and Zoning from Open Space (O -S) to Aviation Specific
Plan (ASP). Generally located at 700 South Douglas Street The Specific Plan area will be
used for a public self - storage facility The Development Agreement would provide for a road
easement for the Douglas Street extension and the lease of parkland on Washington and
Illinois Street (Environmental Assessment EA427, General Plan Amendment GPA 97-4,
Zone Change 97 -3, Zone Text Amendment 98 -6, Environmental Assessment EA -470, and
Development Agreement 99 -1) Property owner Southern California Edison
Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a Public Hearing on a
proposed Specific Plan ( "Aviation Specific Plan") Development Agreement, and amendments
to the General Plan, Zoning Code and Zoning Map to change the existing Land Use
Designation and Zoning from Open Space (O -S) to Aviation Specific Plan (ASP) Generally
located at 700 South Douglas Street He asked if proper notice had been done and if any
written communications had been received. Clerk Mortesen stated that proper noticing had
been done and no written communications had been received
MOVED by Council Member, McDowell SECONDED by Council Member Wenuck to
continue the Public Hearing to November 16, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
3 Replacement of Downtown Events Coordinator (Fiscal Impact: $15,000).
Mayor ProTem Jacobs left the dais and did not participate in this item due to a possible conflict of
interest.
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Gaines to consider
the recommendation from the Downtown Revitalization Subcommittee to terminate the existing
Contract No 2705 with Wagner Events and approve Contract No. 2736 with The Concept
Factory. MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOICE VOTE. AYES: MAYOR
GORDON, COUNCIL MEMBERS MCDOWELL AND GAINES. NOES: COUNCIL
MEMBER WERNICK NOT - PARTICIPATING: MAYOR PROTEM JACOBS 3/1/1
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - NONE
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 3, 1999
PAGE NO 3
283
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously If a call
for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading
of business.
4 Warrant Numbers 2506032 - 2506317 in total amount of $514,314.69 on Register No. 2, and
Wire Transfers in the amount of $334,178.43.
City Council meeting minutes of October 19, 1999
Request from Proficiency Capital Corporation to hang a temporary banner (30' x 40'— 1,200
square feet total) to announce the remodeling of the office building at 2300 East Imperial
Highway (the former Pacific Bell Telephone Building). The sign, which exceeds the
specifications of the City's Sign Code, would be located on the east side of the building, and
would be in place for seven months, until May 2000 (Sign Plan 99 -23) Applicant-
Proficiency Capital Corporation.
7 Amendment No. 1 to the City — C. J. Construction, Inc., annual sidewalk/curb replacement
Contract No. 2638 providing a one (1) year extension and authorize an allocation of
$50,000.00 from unallocated Gas Tax funds for sidewalk repair work.
8 Replacement of City Hall Pool Car, Fire Department sedan and Environmental Safety
Division's Chevrolet Astro Van ( #3318) Fiscal Impact. $86,184.
9 Approve conclusion of Phase 5 of the El Segundo Residential Sound Insulation (RSI)
Program.
10 Request to submit purchase orders to encumber funds for Library materials through various
accounts with Baker and Taylor Information Services for the period October 1, 1999 —
September 30, 2000. Fiscal Impact: $82,500. (Appropriated under FY 1999/2000 Budget
Library Accounts. 6104: 5501/550215505/5507. Total appropriated in those accounts:
$183,800)
11 Request to submit purchase order to encumber funds for Library online cataloging with
OCLC Pacific Network for the period October 1, 1999 — September 30, 2000. Fiscal Impact:
$18,000. (Appropriated under FY 1999/2000 Budget Library Account: 6102 -6214 Total
12 Resolution No. 4135 of the City Council of the City of El Segundo, California establishing
new salary ranges for the job classifications of Supervising Communications Dispatcher,
Commumcations Dispatcher I and Communications Dispatcher 11 and an Examination Plan
for those Personnel Merit System Job classifications. Fiscal Impact- funding for the new
salary ranges is contained in the 1999 -2000 Fiscal Year Operating Budget.
13 Examination plan for the Personnel Ment System job classification of Water Maintenance
Leadworker
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 3,1999
284 PAGE NO 4
MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs to approve
consent agenda item numbers 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOCIE VOTE. 5/0
CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA - NONE
F. NEW BUSINESS -
14 Approval of plan for Phase 6 and award of Contract No. 2737 to Wyle Laboratories, Inc for
acoustic, architectural, and engineering consultant services for the City's Residential Sound
Insulation (RSI) Program.
MOVED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, SECONDED by Council Member Wermck, to approve plan for
Phase 6 and award of Contract No. 2737 to Wyle Laboratories, Inc. for acoustic, architectural, and
engineering consultant services for the City's Residential Sound - Insulation (RSI) Program.
MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510
G. REPORTS - CITY MANAGER — NONE
H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY - NONE
I. REPORTS - CITY CLERK —
15 Resolutions, calling for, requesting County Services for, and adopting regulations for
Candidates Statements for a Municipal Election, April 11, 2000.
City Attorney, Mark Hensley read the following resolutions:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2000, FOR THE
ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIOS OF THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES RENDER
SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2000
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR THE ELECTIVE
OFFICES PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES' STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE
VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRI 11, 2000
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 3, 1999
PAGE NO 5
285
MOVED by Council Member Wemick, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs to adopt
Resolution No. 4136, calling and giving notice of a general municipal election, Resolution
No. 4137, requesting the Board of Supervisors to render specified services, and Resolution
No. 4138, adopting regulations pertaming to candidate statements. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
J. REPORTS - CITY TREASURER - NONE
K REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member McDowell - Spoke regarding the work that will be taking place at airport
Council Member Gaines - NONE
Council Member Wernick -
16 Schedule meeting of Council subcommittee to discuss noise provisions of the General
Plan
A meeting of Council subcommittee to discuss noise provisions of the General Plan
is to be scheduled by City Manager, Mary Strenn.
Mayor ProTem Jacobs - Spoke regarding the Guaymas visit and the baseball game
Mayor Gordon - Stated that the noise problems on Richmond Street, discussed earlier, are
being worked out by the affected parties.
He also spoke regarding animal control. He stated that the SPCA has offered to house any
animals picked up in El Segundo, and the County has agreed to transport the animals to the
SPCA. A signed agreement has not been completed.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals, who hove
received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speabng on behalf of their employer,
must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of 5250
Liz Garnholz, resident, spoke regarding the money for LAX expansion opposition. She also asked who she is
to contact regarding trees
Frank Wong, resident, stated no one has measured the noise from the airport. He also asked questions about
the installation of products used on the sound insulation project
Mary Strenn, City Manager, addressed the budget questions, and the tree master plan. She stated that the
public can talk to the Director of Recreation and Parks, Greg Johnson.
Liz Gamholz, resident, she spoke regarding the tree master plan and the -need for more public input.
MEMORIALS - NONE
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 1, 1999
PAGE NO 6
? R r,
CLOSED SESSION - NONE
ADJOURNMENT at 8: 30 p.m, to November 16, 1999 at 5:00 p.m.
Cmdy Mortesen, City Clerk
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 3, 1999
PAGE NO 7
'97
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
MEETING DATE: November 16, 1999
AGENDA HEADING: Consent
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
A release from the City of El Segundo is being sought by the private producer of a film documenting the Every 15
Minutes program
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
Approve release of the rights to film footage with sbpulabon that the City of El Segundo have access to copy the
film at City expense
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
Early in the planning stages for the 1998/1999 presentation of Every 15 Minutes, the Police Department set a goal
to make a film festival quality documentary of the Every 15 Minutes program It is the intention to allow this
powerful anti -drug and alcohol message to have as wide a distribution as possible
The producer is now seeking a release of rights to the film from the City of El Segundo to promote and market this
documentary
DISCUSSION:
The City's only concern is to ensure access to the finished video in order to make reproductions at our expense
The City Attorney, Mark Hensley has voiced no opposition to this proposal
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Staff Report from Acting Captain Krumbach to Acting Chief Wayt dated November 4, 1999
FISCAL IMPACT:
(Check one) Operating Budget: Capital Improv. Budget:
Amount Requested: $ 0
Project/Account Budget: $
Project/Account Balance: Date:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required - Yes_ No CL
ORIOINATED: � Date: November 9, 1999
-'John O Wavl Actmp Chief of Police
U;�
98F 8
City of El Segundo
Inter - Departmental Correspondence
November 4, 1999
To: Jack Wayt, Acting Chief of Police
From: Walt Krumbach, Acting Captain, Administrative Services Bureau
Subject: Release of Rights from the City of El Segundo for a Documentary Film
PROPOSAL
Through the efforts of a local volunteer film director, Ms Maryann Borders, the El
Segundo Police Department has produced a professional documentary video of the Every
15 Minutes program This 52- minute video has been submitted to the Sundance Film
Festival for consideration in the category of documentary over 50 minutes.
The producer is now seeking a release of rights to the film from the City of El Segundo to
promote and market this documentary. We are also looking into the possibility of using
this in an hour -long version suitable for ainng on MTV and/ or VH -1.
BACKGROUND
In 1997, the El Segundo Police Department took the lead to present Every 15 Minutes
That event provided an invaluable partnership between various civic organizations, both
public and private, and individuals Strong bonds that we have developed over the years
within the City of El Segundo were utilized to provide a wide variety of ideas and
support, while indirectly educating those outside our initial target group of driving age
students
At the conclusion of that presentation we had set several goals. First, to re- create this
emotional event during school year 1998/99. Second, we needed to broadcast the actual
sounds of a traffic accident, as opposed to having someone narrate the events, to make
the event "more authentic ". And finally, we wanted to once again get the community
involved by means of contributing assistance, either financially or through the services
they could provide
Early on in the planning stages for the 1998/1999 presentation, the Police Department
added an additional goal; to make a film festival quality documentary of the Every 15
Minutes program We wanted this powerful message to have as wide a distribution as
possible
The film director's role was to capture the events as they unfolded along with El Segundo
Community Cable. In fact, they were able to help each other in their bifurcated roles
The cable channel produced a short vignette used during the assembly on the second day.
The producer was tasked with the role of creating the documentary film.
Jack Wayt, Acting Chief of Police
289
November 5, 1999
Page 2
On May 20ei and 21 a of this year, we once again presented the Every 15 Minutes program
in our community. All of the above goals were realized A staged traffic collision was
choreographed directly in front of the High School, which required the closure of a main
thoroughfare through the heart of the City. If this had been an actual movie set, the cost
of staging tlus event with police, fire, coroner and private ambulance response was
estimated to be about $100,000.
The program involved little to no cost to the City of El Segundo. Private business and
individual donations funded our program along with a $4,000 grant from the State of
California, Department of Alcohol Beverage Control.
We exceeded our expectations with our staged traffic accident. Many of the firefighters
and police officers that responded remarked it looked like the real thing, and these are
trained professionals The students that were assembled on the sidewalk watching were
speechless through out the entire event
It was reported in the May 27, 1999 edition of the El Segundo Herald, "that it was clear
that the purpose of the meticulously planned program had truly been realized " There was
not one drunk driving incident for any El Segundo student at prom.
RECCOMENDATION
The El Segundo Police Department's only concern in this matter would be to make sure
that the City of El Segundo has access to the finished video and any audio or visual
recordings and photographs, that may be needed, to be reproduced at our expense. Mr.
Mark Hensley in the City Attorney's Office has no opposition to this.
It would be the recommendation of the El Segundo Police Department to release our
rights to film provided the above stipulation is met.
290
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
MEETING DATE: November 16, 1999
AGENDA HEADING: Consent
AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Request for permit to operate a hot dog cart within the El Segundo city limits
Sec 5.08 540 ESMC (Food Peddling)
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve permit
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Sec 5.08.540 ESMC (Food Peddling).
Every person peddling foods, foodstuffs, and food products, other than from catering food trucks, shall
pay a Business License Tax of forty three dollars ($43) per year where the person is on foot, and eighty-
eight dollars ($88) per year where the same is sold from a vehicle, and shall obtain a special permit from
the City Council to do so prior to engaging in such activities The City Council may condition such
permit in any manner not prolubited bylaw (Ord. 1168)
DISCUSSION Big John's Caf6 is currently licensed and is presently operating a food cart at the Farmer's
Market the food cart was inspected and approved by the Los Angeles County Health Department on
August 12, 1999 The vendor is now requesting approval for a permit.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. Public Health License/Permit Application, Los Angeles
County Health Department Mobile Food Velucle Program Official Inspection Report, Business
Registration Application
FISCAL IMPACT-
(Check one) Operating Budget: X Capital Improv. Budget:
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance: Date:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required - Yes_ No X
ORIGINATED/ / Y — p L' Date: i I _ /Q
REVIEWED BY: Date:
///
ACTION TAKEN:
219 3 9
Jy _
i
Sort
> sl
f C0
00
¢
aj-
U
a
aI
U�
J
T
��
W
I
I Z
0
�
12o
`V
a
OL
114jh
=1
LAJ
�
Q
pp
U
W
0
E]
L
'I
_
2
I
w
Q
Z
'�
,(
N
N
W
Y
J
�
O
tu
rJ
a
=
MV
u�
17
y
W
J
F
0
0
C6
W
w
O
4
J
W
1 t
0
N
CID
V1
�
•O
•�
•�
/
W
�
2
�
LL
O
0
0
O
pLLC�.
Qm
m N
Z
W
❑
�q t%
N U2
7 n_ L =
t) !y
�_
LE
G) ^ ul
r g
�_ V{ C• N � p
¢ l U
n. �
� f
:u
z° -yy
� ^ F
2
U
'1
,M
j Z W
�J �
2 Z
2 W
=� V
L= N
w
tu
H
NQ
O
a
1�i
ao
I Z
0
�
12o
`V
w
A
114jh
IL¢ I¢
�
�q t%
N U2
7 n_ L =
t) !y
�_
LE
G) ^ ul
r g
�_ V{ C• N � p
¢ l U
n. �
� f
:u
z° -yy
� ^ F
2
U
'1
,M
j Z W
�J �
2 Z
2 W
=� V
L= N
w
tu
H
NQ
O
a
OWNW,
z
LU
U W
a ¢
ED N 6 R
W w C J
¢ ; m
a u ¢
�Or-
N 09 W
9
Ir
xU
6
F-
i
n
U
V
WF�¢
C
292
ao
�
`V
w
A
❑
�
�)
f
pp
U
W
0
E]
v
_
2
Q
Z
'�
❑
Y
J
J
rJ
_ Z
=
17
W
W
J
0
0
O
4
1 t
0
V)
•�
•�
/
W
�
W
pLLC�.
y¢2
¢FW
J
J
N
oen2/s9
i W I IAN
rwo-
Z
W
y W
4<
Za
4Q gt
�O
Oz
aZ C3Z
g 4
OWNW,
z
LU
U W
a ¢
ED N 6 R
W w C J
¢ ; m
a u ¢
�Or-
N 09 W
9
Ir
xU
6
F-
i
n
U
V
WF�¢
C
292
�
`V
w
A
❑
�
pp
U
W
v
OWNW,
z
LU
U W
a ¢
ED N 6 R
W w C J
¢ ; m
a u ¢
�Or-
N 09 W
9
Ir
xU
6
F-
i
n
U
V
WF�¢
C
292
+ Business Lice= Division AG'IF +'iLaDwu,tsAesNnuort Appl�.ntNu�r5aidetsQna nawnuu. Tpmu WCWE
350 Main Sweet rabw+eala ygpymtte� °SSffY'"'Tiurp,rdm..R,.ep.rxe eer.
•
El Segando, CA 90245 R9
CStcD'� (310) 607 -2243 65'01 S 1 130
BUSINESS REGISTRATION APPLICA'I AN A 1:303M /! �
YLL"E T PL Da Pk! \T CumLLt - L/ f 1
Pkxo dweL apl,oi,ate boa. C}w7wxm, a xttlupa Sale Proffwlot !��0/'N -ae
Mvhnp Address N! AdfertnQ y - / / v a
Suronp Dam m E Sepundn Tm.l 0 of r-mpMlm� p�-ro iissq.- Foote {,
i Gn t aGn a Sws in n�.ed� 7 %f../ /�$oyl semm7 , J /<IQ�N -G'��i
(Requved d ,ppirohk)
Lim J Corporate OfhcrnO. r Taie Nome AddremlCrrylSute/Lp Cade Nome Telephmte
l./ 9-- yr 31 3Go
rull Dcscnmmn or aun,ta
Commctor Smm Clawhexm
CarennRRuhhO Vehmlc Year A Mute of Veht1e FicT fJO LT ( . M7 -/ La .
Orhet %orL Type Dmty Prndueu� Deln<ey Senva Janaccal Seenee-
Junt/Rubboh Colbww_ laud tr) 1.¢wn Senxe— Other T 0
Dr•+cr i lurme r Su.: Lances Tjye %�i� //
Now of prtt+om nmu at
I bve you had a preumua d Srsutdo Btus,m Inenrc^ 1 cn r No_
Change nr rMa.mbw+ Yes— Nnze rrmnwt(Mw ,, Nnntr
Ru•.nt+. Nimc ChanR.Aneorpor�atrr e.
^ Y� N(`Pl.. nay. t. ,m•
.WJ.,, Chinpe+ Ya_ No_✓ /m Rt.wus AJJn
K,11 three be rmvtammex^ Ya— Nn Va rnp • �,�� v._ Ah,",' Scntd+ Ye._ Nn_ ABC •
\.rul.np Mxhmes^ Yn_Nn �NumM[e 7'p. of N whim•
1,vIwJ x Name A
AJJnmml Ow Busrmxe Lmsf rtr-lxr by Addm.. A felunre rr+ ,w
AI,Irr.wN n.- le. Ao
7 Q 7
I•..1wr � _ Amwnt PuW S l u.h Cbnl M
PuM,c 4L.,ctt _ _
Pln,nrn. k....d &
sU161 -�
.+ na 041RlLllvL' 11E.A WUALC'1L'tt'"_
OFB'ICIAL INSPECTION REPORT YEARIMAKE: `gqG L_e N I t f 2525 Corporate Placr
PUBI1C HEALTH PROGRAMS VIN: L G. A fJ 50 eq 17 74i Sz9-1 7 U Monterey Park, Ca 9175<
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 031 i- .Lo -Cj _ ; Telephone (213) 881 -405
TRADE NAME AND ADDRE55 r
-50 N S
COMMISSARY
kA MEN^
DISTRICT
LOCATION OF INSPECITON
TYPE OF VEHICLE
SC
PHPa
7 v f C1 -_2 _ 1
OWNER
Avic-L, oHAj
VEII UC
OPERATOR
SAA
r a.0 ..r=
zi in - l . zZr'aa. SI /2f 1544
OPERATOR'SADDRFSS �+ CERT a
P0r a CA IDA Yes I No /0r'�
You are hereby directed to (Where checked) G F AP _MP
You are hereby further directed to
Provide hot and cold running water to the ulemil and handwnihing smks
_ Provide adequate hot and cold water (low (I gal joun)
_ Maintain penshable hot foods at or above 14(NF
— Maintain perishable cold foods at or below 45 °F
_ Provide an accurate thermometer in the warming oven and /or refrigerator
_ Provide an accurate probe thermometer for the steam table
_ Provide adequate mechanical refrigeration
Discontinue offering for customer self-service, unwrapped /partially
wrapped unprotected foods
Provide approved labeling on all wrapped foods offered for self - service
_ Eliminate the vermin infestation (cockroaches, flies, etc
_ Discontinue stonng items in handwash sink
-a
p nj
ivt r-
-- v ip
=Sr`„t
'� a rn
f 'q '-i
T � tom-'-
it
, -� c r T- C' u'
i s, o
t.--' _ _) m o moo-' to '
-� J uw
ts! rT_'
i„ r
s J
*n
LI
C,
_ Discontinue stonng chemicals with food items
_ Seal gaps, cracks & crevices with approved sealant
_ Seal all holes leading from the battery and /or trash compartment to the
interior of the vehicle
— Provide pass -out window screen%
_ Provide ceiling vent screens
_ Discontinue propping open passout window screens and /or driver's door
_ Discontinue allowing waste water to be deposited on the ground
_ Provide missing waste tank valves and/or caps LT RT
_ Connect all drain lines to the waste tanks
_ Clean the hood & grease filters
Clean the ceding vent and /or screens
_ Provide shatterproof safety shields to the lights
_ Provide an approved fire extmgmsher, properly charged
_ Repair/Replace/Remove
_ Provide current public health permit
-
_ Provide current certification sticker
_ Provide proper I D to both sides of the vehicle in letters 3" high with
3/8" stroke
Unless otherwise noted all corrections must be completed within 5 days
_ Provide information regarding approved commissary service
Provide soap & towels in dispensers
Provide adequate hair restraints for food handlers
"Notice- Failure To Correct The Above Violations By the Reinspection Date
Noted Above May Result In Additional Fees For Remspections"
�D & TEST RESULTS [Thermometer to Temp of in Warming Oven OF
,AL SAMPLES COLLECTED Temp. of in Steam Table OF
Temp, of in RefnR eF
ITOGRAPH(S) TAKEN
,UNTARI CONDEMNATION 1, hereby volumanly agree to The condemnation and destruction of the
nal(s) listed below, said matenal(s being alleged unfit for human consumption and in violation of the California Health & Safety Code, Division 21. Chapter R 1 '
)v release the County of Los Angola Department of Health Services and authorized agents from any and all responsibility.
ITEM15) LBSIM CONDTON nEM(S) LBSIOW; I CONDITION
PHONE 1213) 881 -4054 , WITHIN
A of /
TIME
VH1954 (REV 3/92) 7/96
DAYS TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR INSPECTION OF THIS VEHICLE
AM PM RULES & REGS ISSUED YF„$� NO
R.E.HS
% M.Y�TM —ivy
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 16, 1999
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Annual Resolutions fixing the employer's contribution under the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act
FISCAL IMPACT Approximate maximum increase of $102,000 for Fiscal Year 1999/2000.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Adopt the required Resolutions
BRIEF SUMMARY.
The Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) Board of Administration requires the City to file annual Resolutions
reflecting any changes in the City's contribution for employees and annuitants under the Public Employees Medical and
Hospital Care Act
The PERS Board requires that a separate Resolution be adopted for each specified employee unit or group of
employees Under the Act, the premiums for the various health plans have been adfusted effective January 1st of each
year, changes in the City contribution, if applicable, are also effective January 1st
Current Memorandum of Understanding contract provisions with our Police Officers Association, Firefighters Association
and City Employees Association provide that the City contribution is based on the average dollar increase in the
premiums for HMO's available to all PERS covered employees in the Southern California area For the upcoming 2000
medical year, the maximum City contribution for medical coverage will be $456 /month per employee The maximum
contribution for the previous medical year was $429 /month per employee 227 employees are represented by these
associations
The City's maximum contnbuton for Police Officers Association, Firefighter's Association and City Employees
Association annuitants is the same as for an active, represented employee
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Proposed Resolutions
FISCAL IMPACT:
(Check one) Operating Budget: _X Capital Improv. Budget.
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance: Date:
Account Number: 001. 400 - 2901 -4204
Project Phase: NIA
Appropriation Required - Yes_ Nom_
� 3x
ff,J
?q i
f-ldc — 3,7� ( - 0 Ol
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE EMPLOYER'S
CONTRIBUTION UNDER THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'
MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT FOR THE
EL SEGUNDO CITY EMPLOYEE'S ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 22825.6 provides that a local agency contracting
under the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act shall fox the amount of the employer's contribution
at an amount not less than the amount required under Section 22825 of the Act, and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 22857 provides that a contracting agency may fix
the amount of the employer's contribution for employees and the employer's contribution for annuitants at
different amounts provided that the monthly contribution for annuitants shall be annually increased by an
amount not less than 5 percent of the monthly contribution for employees, until such time as the amounts are
equal, and
WHEREAS, the City of El Segundo, hereinafter referred to as a Public Agency is a local
agency contracting under the Act for participation by members of the City Employees' Association
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DOES
HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the employer's contribution for each employee shall be the amount
necessary to pay the full cost of his /her enrollment, including the enrollment of his /her family members in a
health benefits plan up to a maximum of $456 00 per month, effective January 1, 2000
SECTION 2. That the employer's contribution for each annuitant shall be the amount
necessary to pay the full cost of his /her enrollment, including the enrollment of his/her family members in a
health benefits plan up to a maximum of $456 00 per month, effective January 1, 2000
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of November, 1999
Mike Gordon, Mayor of the
City of El Segundo
ATTEST
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number
of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No was duly passed
and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all
at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 16th day of November 1999, and the same was so passed
and adopted by the following vote
AYES-
NOES.
ABSENT'
ABSTAIN.
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM:
rK V Hen y
29F
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE EMPLOYER'S
CONTRIBUTION UNDER THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'
MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT FOR THE
EL SEGUNDO POLICE OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION.
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 22825.6 provides that a local agency contracting
under the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act shall fix the amount of the employer's contribution
at an amount not less than the amount required under Section 22825 of the Act, and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 22857 provides that a contracting agency may fix
the amount of the employer's contribution for employees and the employer's contribution for annuitants at
different amounts provided that the monthly contribution for annuitants shall be annually increased by an
amount not less than 5 percent of the monthly contribution for employees, until such time as the amounts are
equal, and
WHEREAS, the City of El Segundo, hereinafter referred to as a Public Agency is a local
agency contracting under the Act for participation by members of the El Segundo Police Officer's Association
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DOES
HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the employer's contribution for each employee shall be the amount
necessary to pay the full cost of his /her enrollment, including the enrollment of hisfher family members in a
health benefits plan up to a maximum of $456 00 per month, effective January 1, 2000
SECTION 2. That the employer's contribution for each annuitant shall be the amount
necessary to pay the full cost of his /her enrollment, including the enrollment of his/her family members in a
health benefits plan up to a maximum of $456 00 per month, effective January 1, 2000
ATTEST
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of November, 1999
Mike Gordon, Mayor of the
City of El Segundo
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number
of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No was duly passed
and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all
at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 16th day of November 1999, and the same was so passed
and adopted by the following vote
AYES
NOES-
ABSENT-
ABSTAIN
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM
i
ark D H n ty Attome
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE EMPLOYER'S
CONTRIBUTION UNDER THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'
MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT FOR THE
EL SEGUNDO FIREFIGHTER'S ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 22825 6 provides that a local agency contracting
under the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act shall fix the amount of the employer's contribution
at an amount not less than the amount required under Section 22825 of the Act, and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 22857 provides that a contracting agency may fix
the amount of the employer's contribution for employees and the employer's contribution for annuitants at
different amounts provided that the monthly contribution for annuitants shall be annually increased by an
amount not less than 5 percent of the monthly contribution for employees, until such time as the amounts are
equal, and
WHEREAS, the City of El Segundo, hereinafter referred to as a Public Agency is a local
agency contracting under the Act for participation by members of the El Segundo Firefighter's Association
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DOES
HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the employer's contribution for each employee shall be the amount
necessary to pay the full cost of his/her enrollment, including the enrollment of his/her family members in a
health benefits plan up to a maximum of $456 00 per month, effective January 1, 2000
SECTION 2. That the employer's contribution for each annuitant shall be the amount
necessary to pay the full cost of his/her enrollment, including the enrollment of his/her family members in a
health benefits plan up to a maximum of $456 00 per month, effective January 1, 2000
ATTEST
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of November, 1999
Mike Gordon, Mayor of the
City of El Segundo
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number
of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed
and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all
at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 16th day of November 1999, and the same was so passed
and adopted by the following vote
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT-
ABSTAIN*
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM:
garkH
298
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
MEETING DATE- November 16, 1999
AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calend
Examination plan for the Personnel Ment System lob classification of Fire Inspector Illl
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Approve the Examination Plan
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
Chapter 2 28 080 of the El Segundo Municipal Code, entitled "Administration and Personnel ", provides that the
Personnel Officer shall review and recommend to the City Manager, who in turn shall recommend to the City Council,
an appropriate examination plan and weights for each portion of the examination for Personnel Merit System lob
classifications,
DISCUSSION:
-REFER TO ATTACHMENT-
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACT:
(Check one) Operating Budget: Capital Improv. Budget,.
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance: Date:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required - Yes_ Nc_
ORIGINATED- Date November 5, 1999
agenda x+2
299 11
,y2 -33C;z'- 001
The Human Resources Department has initiated the recruitment, testing and selection process for the lob classification
of Fire Inspector VII and has posted the notice of the examinations in accordance with the City's Municipal Code and
the City's Personnel Rules and Regulations.
It is recommended that the City Council approve the examination plan that contains the following examination
techniques and weights for each portion of the examination-
Fire Inspector I /II (Open - Competitive)
Multiple Choice Written Examination Pass /Fad
Structured Technical /Career Preparation Interview Weighted 100%
3 ()0
AZ-4 _33-c7? — 00c;�
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 16, 1999
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
MTA bus route concerns
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Receive and file
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.
At the City Council meeting of October 19, 1999, a resident expressed concerns regarding MTA
busses using residential streets and about visual obstructions caused by a bus stop on Grand
Avenue between Main and Standard Streets The City Traffic Committee was directed to
Investigate these concerns and recommend measures to alleviate the situation.
DISCUSSION:
The Committee has discussed and field investigated these concerns with Mr Tom Kelso and Mr
Roger Goldman of the MTA It was the Committee's finding that the citizen concerns pertain to
Route 124 as further explained in this report
(See attached report)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
MTA bus route concerns memo dated November 4, 1999
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget:
Capital Improvement Budget:
Amount Requested:
ProjecUAccount Budget.
ProlectlAccount Balance:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required:
No
Date:
Date.
N COUNCIBNOV16 -01 (ruesday 11/9/99 9 35 A M )
InI
12
DATE
TO
FROM
SUBJECT
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
INTER - DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
November 4, 1999
Mary Strenn
City Manager
Bellur Devara and
City Engineer,
MTA Bus Route Concerns
Sgt. AI Graham
Police Departme t
At the City Council meeting of October 19, 1999, a resident expressed concerns regarding MTA
busses using residential streets and about visual obstructions caused by a bus stop on Grand
Avenue between Main and Standard Streets The City Traffic Committee was directed to
investigate these concerns and recommend measures to alleviate the situation.
The Committee has discussed and field investigated these concerns with Mr Tom Kelso and Mr.
Roger Goldman of the MTA It was the Committee's finding that the citizen concerns pertain to
Route 124 as further explained in this report
Background:
round:
As indicated on the enclosed map, Route 124 services the El Segundo downtown area through
Grand Avenue Until recently the route looped around Richmond, Holly, and Main Streets, and
returned eastbound on Grand Avenue Since downtown is the terminus of Route 124, the bus
utilized a layover zone at the southeast comer of Holly and Richmond Streets Generally at
layover zones, the bus driver is entitled to take a break of approximately ten (10) minutes
Recently, due to the construction of a condominium budding adjacent to the lay -over zone, the
zone was relocated by the MTA to the southside of Grand Avenue, east of Main street, adjacent
to the Washington Mutual Bank Route 124 began to use this stop as a temporary layover zone,
utilizing the residential Eucalyptus Dnve /Holly Street route north of Grand Avenue. This re-
routing has caused the situation of busses travelling in the residential area and the sight
distance concerns for the parking lot exit driveway on Grand Avenue.
Action Taken:
The Traffic Committee met with MTA staff, drove the downtown area and discussed several
options for the Route 124 layover zone A zone on the northside of Grand Avenue west of
Eucalyptus Street was not recommended due to the curve in the street and closeness to the
Main Street/Grand Avenue intersection A zone on the 100 block of Richmond Street was not
recommended due to an uphill grade (MTA has safety concerns related to runaway busses, etc.)
and due to the frequent use of Richmond Street for movie filming The Committee recommends
(and MTA has concurred) a layover zone on the eastside of Main Street, north of El Segundo
Boulevard, adjacent to the Chevron parking lot This location will result in loss of two (2) parking
spaces, however there are no businesses directly abutting the layover zone.
Page 1
3'12
Mary Strenn
MTA Bus Route Concerns
November 4, 1999
Page 2
(continued)
As noted on the enclosed map, the recommended Main Street/El Segundo Boulevard layover
zone eliminates the current zone on Grand Avenue and redirects the bus route to the industrial
area south of Grand Avenue To address the immediate concern, staff has verbally notified
MTA to commence utilizing the new route and layover zone. MTA has informed us that they will
start implementing the new route and layover zone starting the week of November 14, 1999
The Committee recommends that the City monitor the effectiveness of the above change and re-
evaluate the new route and layover zone after completion of the condominium construction at
Richmond and Holly Streets MTA has stated its preference to permanently vacate this layover
zone in anticipation of potential future complaints by the condominium residents
Recommendations:
The above recommendations are summarized as follows
(a) Request the MTA to stop Route 124 from using the City residential area north of Grand
Avenue and the bus layover zone adjacent to Washington Mutual Bank on the southside
of Grand Avenue, east of Main Street
(b) Request the MTA to re -route Route 124 to the industrial area south of Grand Avenue and
to designate a layover zone on the east side of Main Street, north of El Segundo
Boulevard
(c) The recommended re- routing be re- evaluated after a trial period of six (6) months by
which time the condominium construction at Richmond and Holly Streets is anticipated to
be completed At this time, consider making the revised route permanent if the re -routing
has alleviated the City's concerns, without causing negative impacts.
Note: As noted before, MTA will commence the re- routing starting the week of November 14,
1999, as requested by staff.
BKD dr
Enclosures
cc Ron Green, Interim Director of Public Works
Tim Gnmmond, Chief, Police Department
N \MEMOS \BUS - ROUTES MS I n n
F'3
DD bs`�d 0
Vaa3ls is
NN3d
1S
DD O
VlIWO'1
0
�� vaa3ls
D O
O NN3d
DDo
DN00'73HS
DD
P� NIVW T
D
1S u ONO Jla
o00 oD�t
1S Oa0JN00 F ZI �� o
D�OL�COD
DD 0 DD VWl�aln D D cn
DDODD�DDD W
Eo4-j
1S
VNOtiV9 �_� D D a
1S
ViSln VWOI =
z 1S A3�"
J j d
W d
Z
is (� ls3ar ���If
n
w
Z � �
CA
� v
N
3
K
�I
p
p3
O
0
v
Li
W J
A O
T
IV
Hz
v
of
J
Hh
zQ
ju
Q
oc
lVX-
VO
h
v
>� 0
U
i ^r
0
l __J
3 is
v
Lu
�lot � l�
DD O
VlIWO'1
0
�� vaa3ls
D O
O NN3d
DDo
DN00'73HS
DD
P� NIVW T
D
1S u ONO Jla
o00 oD�t
1S Oa0JN00 F ZI �� o
D�OL�COD
DD 0 DD VWl�aln D D cn
DDODD�DDD W
Eo4-j
1S
VNOtiV9 �_� D D a
1S
ViSln VWOI =
z 1S A3�"
J j d
W d
Z
is (� ls3ar ���If
n
w
Z � �
CA
� v
N
3
K
�I
p
p3
O
0
v
Li
W J
A O
T
IV
Hz
v
of
J
Hh
zQ
ju
Q
oc
lVX-
VO
h
v
>� 0
U
i ^r
0