The URL can be used to link to this page

1999 NOV 03 CC PACKETAGENDA EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City- related business that is within the lunsdiction of the City Council and/or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portion of the Meeting Additionally, the Public can comment on any Public Heating item on the Agenda during the Public Heating portion of such item The time limit for comments is five (5) minutes per person Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state Your name and residence and the organuatton you represent, if desired Please respect the time limits Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2 00 p in the prior Tuesday) The request must include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not exceed five (5) minutes in length In compliance with the Americans mth Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this ineefing, please contact City Clerk 607 -2208, Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 3,1999 - 5:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Councihnember Kelly McDowell ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of$50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalj'of another, and employees speaking on behalf oftheir employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250 CLOSED SESSION: The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, et M.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation, and/or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel), and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as follows L iii 002 G1� Y ©�, AGENDA EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda Items Unless otherwise noted in the Agenda, the Public can only comment on City- related business that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council and/or items listed on the Agenda during the Public Communications portion of the Meeting, Additionally, the Public can comment on any Public Hearing item on the Agenda during the Public Hearing portion of such item The time limit for comments is five (5) minutes per person Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and state Your name and residence and the organization you represent, if desired Please respect the time limits Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2-00 p in the prior Tuesday) The request must include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings if they are submitted to the City Clerk two (2) working days prior to the meeting and they do not exceed five (5) minutes in length In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 607 -2208. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 3,1999 - 7:00 P.M. Next Resolution # 4135 Next Ordinance # 1315 CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Councilmember Kelly McDowell PRESENTATIONS — (a) Announcement of Household Hazardous Waste Roundup to be held from 9:00 a.m. to 3.00 p.m on Saturday, November 13, 1999 at Raytheon Corporation, Parlang Lot G at Hughes Way off of Sepulveda Boulevard 003 (b) Commendation to Airport Unocal 76 station for its civic contribution to the community by volunteering to participate in the used oil recovery and recycling program. (c) Announcement by Joe Harding of the continuation on November 13, 1999 from 8 :00 a.m. to noon, for the Beautification of El Segundo Together project, known as The BEST Day," and Certificate of Recognition to Art and Patrice Lester for exemplifying the volunteer spirit of El Segundo (d) Certificate of Appreciation to Hazen McIntyre, owner of Total Baseball, for participating in the Guaymas -El Segundo Sister City baseball team sports exchange (c) Proclamation to kick off the eighth year the El Segundo Fire Department has joined the Los Angeles County Fire Department's Spark of Love Campaign for toys and food items to be donated during the Holiday Season to cluldren who otherwise might not experience the boy of Christmas. ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of$50 or more to communicate to the City Council on beha fofanother, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250 A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only Recommendation - Approval. B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS - Public hearing on Environmental Assessment EA -492 and Precise Plan 99 -1 (Seventh Amendment to PP 12 -77) related to outdoor dining and parking Address- 2041 Rosecrans Avenue, 831 -871 South Nash Street (Beach Cities Plaza). Applicant: Continental Development Corporation, Recommendation, 1) Open Public Hearing; 2) Discussion; 3) Reading of Resolution by title only; 4) By motion, adopt Resolution approving the project; and/or, 5) Other possible action /direction. 004 2. Public Hearing on a proposed Specific Plan ( "Aviation Specific Plan") Development Agreement, and amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Code and Zoning Map to change the existing Land Use Designation and Zoning from Open Space (O -S) to Aviation Specific Plan (ASP) Generally located at 700 South Douglas Street. The Specific Plan area will be used for a public self - storage facility. The Development Agreement would provide for a road easement for the Douglas Street extension and the lease of parkland on Washington and Illinois Street (Environmental Assessment EA -427, General Plan Amendment GPA 97 -4, Zone Change 97 -3, Zone Text Amendment 98 -6, Environmental Assessment EA -470, and Development Agreement 99 -1) Property owner Southern Cahforma Edison Recommendation — 1) Open Public Hearing; 2) Continue Public Hearing until November 16,1999; and/or, 3) Other possible action /direction. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Replacement of Downtown Events Coordinator (Fiscal Impact: $15.000) Recommendation — Consider recommendation from the Downtown Revitalization Subcommittee to terminate the existing contract with Wagner Events and approve a contract with The Concept Factory. D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - NONE E. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business Warrant Numbers 2506032- 2506317 m total amount of $514,314 69 on Register No. 2, and Wire Transfers in the amount of $334.178.43. Recommendation - Approve Warrant Demand Register and Authorize staff to release. Ratify: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or agreements; emergency disbursements and/or adjustments; and wire transfers from 10/09/99 to 10/22/99. City Council meeting minutes of October 19, 1999 Recommendation - Approval. Request from Proficiency Capital Corporation to hang a temporary banner (30' x 40' —1,200 square feet total) to announce the remodeling of the office building at 2300 East Imperial Highway (the former Pacific Bell Telephone Building). The sign, which exceeds the specifications of the City's Sign Code, would be located on the east side of the building, and would be in place for seven months, until May 2000 (Sign Plan 99 -23) Applicant- Proficiency Capital Corporation Recommendation — Approve request to bang temporary announcement banner until May 31, 2000. r,05 7 Amendment No. 1 to the City — C J. Construction, Inc., annual sidewalk/curb replacement contract no. 2638 providing a one (1) year extension Recommendation — 1) Approve Amendment No. 1 and authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment on behalf of the City. 2) Authorize an allocation of $50,000.00 from unallocated Gas Tax funds for sidewalk repair work. Replacement of City Hall Pool Car, Fire Department sedan and Environmental Safety Division's Chevrolet Astro Van ( 43318) Fiscal Impact $86.184. Recommendation — Approve and authorize the replacement/purchase of vehicles by the Equipment Maintenance Division and that the pool car be sold at auction. 9 Approve conclusion of Phase 5 of the El Segundo Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Recommendation — Approve, receive and file the final report of Phase 5 of the El Segundo RSI Program. 10 Request to submit purchase orders to encumber funds for Library materials through various accounts with Baker and Taylor Information Services for the period October 1, 1999 — September 30, 2000 Fiscal Impact- $82,500. (Appropriated under FY 1999/2000 Budget Library Accounts. 6104: 5501/5502/5505/5507. Total appropriated in those accounts- $183,800) Recommendation — Approve a purchase order to encumber funds with the Library's primary book vendor, Baker & Taylor Information Services, for the term October 1, 1999 - September 30, 2000 in the amount of $82,500 to cover the costs of Library books, reference sources, and audio /visual materials. 11 Request to subnut purchase order to encumber funds for Library online cataloging with OCLC Pacific Network for the period October 1, 1999 — September 30, 2000. Fiscal Impact: $18,000. (Appropriated under FY 1999/2000 Budget Library Account: 6102 -6214 Total allocated- $22.000) Recommendation — Approve a purchase order to encumber funds to the Library's primary online cataloging service, OCLC Pacific Network, for the term October 1,1999 - September 30, 2000 in the amount of $18,000 to cover the costs of cataloging all Library materials, including books, periodicals, reference sources, videos, music CD's and cassettes, books -on -tape, paperbacks, and school library items. 12 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of El Segundo, California establishing new salary ranges for the job classifications of Supervising Communications Dispatcher, Communications Dispatcher I and Communications Dispatcher R and an Examination Plan for those Personnel Merit System job classifications Fiscal Impact. funding for the new salary ranges is contained in the 1999 -2000 Fiscal Year Operating Budget Recommendation — Adopt Resolution and approve the Examination Plan. 13. Examination plan for the Personnel Ment System job classification of Water Maintenance Leadworker Recommendation — Approve the Examination Plan. C � 6 CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA F. NEW BUSINESS - 14 Approval of plan for Phase 6 and award of contract for acoustic, architectural, and engineering consultant services for the City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSII Program Recommendation — Approve Phase 6 plan and award of Consultant contract to Wyle Laboratories Inc. G. REPORTS - CITY MANAGER — NONE H. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY - NONE I. REPORTS - CITY CLERK — 15 Resolutions, calling for, requesting County Services for, and adopting regulations for Candidates Statements for, a Municipal Election, Apnl 11, 2000 Recommendation — 1) Discussion 2) Read Resolutions by title only 3) Adopt Resolutions. J. REPORTS - CITY TREASURER - NONE K. REPORTS - CITY COUNCILMEMBERS Councilmember McDowell - NONE Councilmember Gaines - NONE Councilmember Wernick- 16 Schedule meeting of Council subcommittee to discuss noise provisions of the General Plan Recommendation — Schedule meeting date. Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs - NONE Mayor Gordon — NONE PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals who have received value of$50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalfofanother, and employees speaking on behalfoftheir employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250 MEMORIALS CLOSED SESSION 5 007 The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code Sec 54960, et S�Mc .) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation, and/or discussing matters covered under Government Code section 54957 (Personnel); and/or confemng with the City's Labor Negotiators; as follows- Continuation of matters listed on the City Council Agenda for 5:00 p.m., November 3, 1999 under "Closed Session" (if needed). REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required) ADJOURNMENT POSTED DATE (o A? 95 TIME a : o NAME 110399ag i EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEETING DATE: November 3, 1999 Public hearing on Environmental Assessment EA -492 and Precise Plan 99 -1 (Seventh Amendment to PP 12 -77) related to outdoor dining and parking Address. 2041 Rosecrans Avenue, 831 -871 South Nash Street (Beach Cities Plaza) Applicant Continental Development Corporation RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION- 1) Open Public Hearing, 2) Discussion, 3) Reading of Resolution by title only, 4) By motion, Adopt Resolution approving the project, and /or, 5) Other possible action /direction INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The application requests approval of the two (2) following separate items A Amendment to PP 12 -72 to increase the total amount of permitted outdoor dining area from 1,200 square feet to 2,500 square feet, and, B Amendment of the development standards of PP 12 -72 to reduce the total required parking for the Beach Cities Plaza from 1,330 parking spaces to 1,066 parking spaces based on the actual counts contained in the Final Status Report on traffic and parking, and, accept all of the findings of the Final Status Report On October 14, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing, reviewed the facts and findings related to Environmental Assessment EA- 492 and Precise Plan Amendment 99 -1, and adopted Resolution No. 2455, recommending approval of the above two amendments A more complete project description, analysis, and background information is included in the accompanying Planning Commission Staff Report and its attachments, which were previously distributed to the City Council on October 8, 1999, and, are again included as an attachment to this Report. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS- (draft) City Council Resolution No (draft) Planning Commission Minutes, October 14, 1999 Planning Commission Staff Report and Attachments, October 14, 1999 (adopted) Planning Commission Resolution No 2405 FISCAL IMPACT. None ORIGINATED- Date: October 19, 1999 Interim Director of /o /r /% P \pro1ectsW76.499tea- 492\ea492 ais doc 1 010 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT — 492 (EA492) AND ADOPTING THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT (PP 99 -1) TO THE BEACH CITIES PLAZA PRECISE PLAN 12 -72 (PP 12- 72), AT 2041 ROSECRANS, AND 831 AND 871 SOUTH NASH STREET. PETITIONED BY CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. WHEREAS, an application has been received from Continental Development Corporation (Applicant), requesting said approval, and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requests approval of an amendment to Precise Plan 12 -72 as amended (PP 12 -72) to provide for the following A Amendment to PP 12 -72 to increase the total amount of permitted outdoor dining area from 1,200 square feet to 2,500 square feet, and, B Amendment of the development standards of PP 12 -72 to reduce the total required parking for the Beach Cities Plaza from 1,330 parking spaces to 1,066 parking spaces based on the actual counts contained in the Final Status Report on traffic and parking, and, accept all of the findings of the Final Status Report WHEREAS, the Applicant and the City desire guidelines to aid in the adtmmstration of PP 12 -72 as amended, and, WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment (EA -492), including analysis of the findings of the Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for EA- 350 (a previous amendment to PP 12 -72 affecting the property), has been available for review and consideration by all interested parties, staff, and affected public agencies in the time and manner prescribed by law, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and supporting evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act, State CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No 3805), and, WHEREAS, on October 14, 1998, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law, and the Planning Commission adopting Resolution No 2455 recommending approval of the Precise Plan Amendment and Environmental Assessment, and, WHEREAS, on November 3, 1999, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 1 0 21 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law, and WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against the findings of Environmental Assessment EA-492 and PP 99 -1, and, WHEREAS, at said hearing the following facts were established 1 The project site is located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo approximately one (1) mile to the west of the San Diego Freeway [Interstate -405 (I -405)} 2 The project area is approximately 6.035 acres (262,900 square feet) 3. The project is generally bounded on the north by heavy industrial land uses, on the south by Rosecrans Avenue, on the east by Nash Street and on the west by heavy industrial land uses Local jurisdictions bordering or near the site include the City of Manhattan Beach located immediately south of Rosecrans Avenue and the City of Hawthorne locate to the east of Aviation Boulevard 4 The site is in the western portion of Continental Park Continental Park is a large office and industrial park containing approximately 2 million square feet of office, research and development, hotel, health club, restaurant, retail, and movie theater uses 5 The site is currently developed with a mixture of commercial, office, restaurant, movie theater, and parking structure uses 6 The Beach Cities Plaza currently consists of 71,792 (net) square feet of retail/office area and 10,320 square feet of indoor and outdoor restaurant area (including the proposed Taiko Restaurant) in the 2041 Rosecrans Avenue building, and 65,000 square feet of movie theater area in the 831 S Nash Street building 7 The current Zoning Code required parking for the Beach Cities Plaza includes 209.23 parking spaces for the retailloffice portion, 137 60 parking spaces for the indoor and outdoor restaurant areas (including the proposed Taiko Restaurant), and 1,130 parking spaces for the Pacific Theatres building The current total Zoning Code required parking is 1490 79 spaces. 8 The Final Status Report, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, dated August 2, 1999, conducted parking counts for the Beach Cities Plaza and concluded that the peak parking demand for the Precise Plan is 1,066 parking spaces on Saturday during the 9:00 p.m peak hour This amount is less than the 1,416 parking spaces provided for the project and less than the 1,330 parking spaces previously approved by City Council Resolution No, 4095 and predicted in Parking Demand Model in the Six Month Status Report, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan on August 26, 1997 2 012 9 The Final Status Report, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, on August 2, 1999, satisfies the traffic study requirements in City Council Resolution No 3917 (Condition No 15), No 4034 (Condition No 13), and No 4064 (Condition No 3) 10 A Parking and Traffic Impact Analysts was prepared by Lmscott, Law & Greenspan, on September 27, 1999, to study the potential traffic and parking impacts from the addition _ of 1,300 square feet of outdoor dining area to the Beach Cities Plaza The Analysis concluded that the proposed additional outdoor dining area would not significantly impact traffic or parking in the Precise Plan area 11 The area surrounding the project site is highly urbanized Land uses consist of medium scale office, commercial, theater, restaurant, and retail uses The Manhattan Marketplace Retail Center and a five -story office building housing a credit union are located to the south across Rosecrans Avenue Beyond the credit union building is the Marriott Hotel with golf and tennis facilities To the southwest of the project across Rosecrans Avenue lies the Manhattan Village Shopping Center 12 The existing building, uses and development standards were approved to 1972 under a Precise Plan (PP 12 -72) as amended This project is the seventh amendment to the original Precise Plan. 13 A Precise Plan is a term for a development application that is no longer used to the City for new projects A Precise Plan would now be called a Specific Plan A Precise Plan amends the zoning map by establishing permitted uses and development standards that apply only to the area covered by the plan No variances are required for Precise Plans, the approval of a Precise Plan establishes the land uses and required development standards for a project 14 The following environmental facts are established A PP 99 -1 is within the scope of the development limits established by the approval of EA -350 (PP 94 -1), which was approved with a Mitigated Negative Declaration related to environmental effects, B PP 99 -1 has no significant environmental impact, and, C PP 99 -1 is categorically exempt from further environmental analysts, pursuant to State CEQA Guideline Section 15301, as a negligible expansion of an existing use 15 The City's General Plan designates the project site for Mixed -Use development The project site is located in the Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone. The project conforms with the land uses and development standards of the General Plan and Zoning Code 3 013 SECTION 1. AFTER CONSIDERING THE ABOVE FACTS, THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND STUDY OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA-492 AND PRECISE PLAN 99 -1 (PP 99 -1), THE CITY COUNCIL MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 492 (EA492), AND ADOPTS REQUIRED FINDINGS RELATED TO THE PP 99 -1 AND ADOPTS THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO CONSISTENCY OF PP 99 -1 WITH THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO'S GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1 The City Council has reviewed the applicable CEQA guidelines and determined that the proposed project qualifies as a Class 1 categorical exemption, pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA guidelines as a minor alteration of an existing structure involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing 2 That when considering the whole record, there is no evidence that the proposed modifications to the project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends, because the project is in a built - out urban environment, and, 3 That the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Director of Planning and Building Safety to file with any appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and de mimmis finding pursuant to AB 3158 and the California Code of Regulations. Within ten (10) days of the approval of Categorical Exemption, the applicant shall submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of $25 00 required by the County of Los Angeles for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of Exemption As approved in AB 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA will not be met and no vesting shall occur until this condition is met and the required notices and fees are filed with the County PRECISE PLAN I That the proposed project is in accord with the purposes of the zone in which the site is located The proposed project is consistent with the intent of the Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone which allows a broad mix of uses 2 Precise Plan 12 -72, and the previous amendments, established the design of the existing facilities and the placement of essential related facilities such as parking, traffic circulation, and loading. Studies prepared by the Applicant and reviewed by the City indicate that no significant increase in environmental effects will occur from the proposed amendment 3 The amendments are consistent with the purposes of a Precise Plan which, like a Specific Plan or a Planned Residential Development, provide the flexibility to allow for deviation from specific site development standards to achieve the overall design for the site 4 014 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY 1 That the proposed amendment is consistent with the following General Plan goals, policies, and objectives A The General Plan Land Use Designation for the site, as well as the zoning, is Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S). In accordance with the General Plan, the Urban Mixed -Use South designation allows a mixture of uses including office, hotels and retail Light industrial uses are allowed with discretionary approval B The Urban Mixed -Use South designation is designed to allow for a flexibility of uses near the three proposed and one future Green Line transit stations The MU -S designation allows an FAR of 1.3, the maximum density allowed in the area, since traffic and air quality impacts associated with higher densities can be more easily mitigated with mixed uses in close proximity to mass transit Findings must be made that the project is in conformance with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan in order to approve the project Interpretation of conformity with the applicable provisions of the General Plan is a policy decision that is at the discretion of the Planning Commission and the City Council, C The proposed project is in conformance with many General Plan goals, policies and objectives related to Economic Development, Land Use, Circulation and Air Quality The following Economic Development objectives and policies apply; ED 1 -1 1, ED 1 -1.2, ED 1 -2, ED 1 -2.1, ED 1 -2.2, and ED 1 -2.3, which relate to prioritizing economic development, diversification of an economic base, expanding the retail and commercial base, targeting industries that balance economic development and quality of life goals, and balancing development with resource and infrastructure capacity. D Many Land Use goals, policies and objectives apply including, LU 4, LU 4 -1.1, LU 4-14, LU 4 -3.1, LU 4 -3 6, LU 4-4, LU 4 -4 3, LU 4 -4.6, LU 4 -4 7, LU 4.5, LU 7 -1.2 and LU 7 -2.3 These issues relate to providing a stable tax base, providing landscaping, encouraging ground floor retail use in a mixed -use environment, providing synergistic relationships with mixed uses and ensuring a mix of uses in the Urban Mixed -Use area, encouraging alternative transportation modes, providing good accessibility to transportation routes, and requiring adequate public facilities and underground utilities. E Circulation Element policies and objectives also apply to the proposal including; C 1 -1.13, C 1 -2 1, C 1 -3.2, C 2-16, C 2 -3 3, C 3 -1, C 3 -1.1, C 3 -1.2, C 3 -1.5, C 3- 1 7, and C 4 -1.2 These policies identify the need for full examination of project traffic impacts and complete mitigation, a hierarchy and street classification system correlated to capacity and function, incorporation of off - street loading facilities, facilities designed for easy pedestrian access, pedestrian linkage to the Green Line, evaluation of circulation system impacts, full nutigation of all project- related circulation impacts, integration of transportation with land uses 5 015 and surrounding environments, requiring developers to pay for mitigation measures, adequate pedestrian and bicycle access and evaluation of project impacts on CMP routes F The proposed project is located on a secondary arterial street (Nash Street) which is already substandard in lane configuration compared to the standards established in the General Plan (2 through lanes in each direction with a stripped median instead of three lanes in each direction with a raised median) The proposed project will not impact the existing situation G The final policies and objectives which apply to the proposed project are contained within the Air Quality Element including, AQ 7 -1 1 and AQ 12 -1.2, which relate to requiring conformance with the SCAQMD PMio standards and encouraging energy conservation features in new building design SECTION 2. THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY APPROVES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA -492 (EA 492) AND ADOPTS PRECISE PLAN 99 -1 (PP 99- 1), AS DESCRIBED BELOW Amendment of the land uses of PP 12 -72 to increase the total amount of permitted outdoor dining area from 1,200 square feet to 2,500 square feet, and, 2 Amendment to the Site Data on "Exhibit 3 - Development Plan" of the Beach Cities Plaza Precise Plan Development Plan and Standards, as depicted in Exhibit A, to revise the required parking from 1,330 parking spaces to 1,066 parking spaces, and, to reflect the current building areas and uses within the Precise Plan area SECTION 3. THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY APPROVES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA492 AND ADOPTS AND CERTIFIES A PRECISE PLAN AMENDMENT 99 -1 AS AN AMENDMENT TO PRECISE PLAN 12 -72, PP 73 -3, PP 74 -10, PP 94 -1, PP 96 -1, PP 96 -IA, AND PP 96 -IB STATED AS ITEMS 1, AND 2 AS DESCRIBED ABOVE, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. 1 The applicant shall indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, actions, causes of action, proceedings or suits which challenge or attack the validity of the City's approval of Environmental Assessment EA-492 and PP 99 -1. 2 Outdoor dining areas in the common plaza area shall be a maximum of 2,500 square feet 6 0 1 E PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of November, 1999. Mike Gordon, Mayor ATTEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No _ was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, ail at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 3rd day of November, 1999, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Mark D Hensley, City Attorney P \Planning & Building Safety\PROJECPSW76 499 \Fa 492 \EA -492 cc -RES doc 017 s r i E i Is If IF CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT A I lit it rz s r Page 1 of 2 i I. 7 ISO. oil i-pill INS 0F8 Sm DATA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT A 1.0 LAND AREA: PARCEL 1, 871 NASH STREM: 1753 ACRES 119,930 SF PARCEL 2. (2041 ROSECRANS)• 3.282 ACRES 14Z970 SF TOTAL 6.035 ACRES 262,900 SF 2.0 GROSS FLOOR AREA 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE 80,659 SF 871 NASH (THEATER) 65.000 SF TOTAL 145.659 SF 3.0 F.A.R 0.55 TO 1 4.0 PARKING. A. CODE REQUIRED:* Page 1 01 I RETAIL /OFFICE 209.23 SPACES RESTAURANT 137.00 SPACES THEATER 1,130.00 SPACES FUTURE OUTDOOR DINING 13.96 SPACES TOTAL CODE REQUIRED PARKING 1490.79 SPACES 8. PARKING DEMAND: *IKPEAK PERIOD) 1,086 SPACES C, PROVIDED PARKING: 831 NASH STREET SURFACE PARKING 177 SPACES 571 NASH STREET PARKING STRUCTURE HANDICAPPED * ** 10 SPACES ALL OTHERS 336 SPACES SURFACE PARKING 47 SPACES TOTAL ON —SITE PARKING 572 SPACES 870 NASH STREET JOINT USE PARKING STRUCTURE 844 SPACES MTAL PARKING PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT 1,416 SPACES # CODE REQUIRED PARKING CALCULATED BASED ON: 1) NET RETAIL /OFFICE FLOOR AREA 25.000 SO. FT. O 1 SPACE PER 300 SO. FT. - 83.33 ,,PACES 25.000 SO. FT. O 1 SPACE PER 350 SO. FT. - 71.42 SPACES 21,792 50, FT. O 1 SPACE PER 400 SQ, FT. - 54.48 SPACES 71.792 SO. FT. 209.23 SPA 2) NET RESTAURANT FLOOR AREA (INCLUDING E)OST. OUTDOOR DINING) 10,320 S0. FT. O 1 SPACE PER 75 50. FT . 137.60 SPACES 3) THEATER CAPACITY 3,391 SEATS O 1 SPACE PER 3 SEATS - 1,130.00 SPACES 4) ADDITIONAL OUTDOOR DINING 2500 EF— EXIST.(1,453 )1,047 S0. FT. O 1 SPACE PER 75 SO. FT. = 1198 SPACES TOTAL CODE REQUIRED PARKING 1,490.79 SPACES ** SOURCE: FINAL STATUS REPORT, BY UNSCOTT LAW A! GREENSPAN, DATED AUGUST Z, 1999. # *# ALL 10 GROUND FLOOR STALLS INCLUDE RELOCA71ON OF 8 HANDICAPPED STALLS PREVIOUSLY LOCATED IN COMMON AREA PLAZA. 019 DRAFT Southern California Edison Vice -Chair Wycoff presented Item 1 -3 Environmental Assessment EA -470, Development Agreement DA 99 -1 — Douglas Street Extension. Address. 700 South Douglas Street (between Douglas Street and Aviation Boulevard), Applicant City of El Segundo. Property Owner: Southern California Edison. Vice -Chair Wycoff opened the public hearing. Charles Wilkerson, 502 Washington Street, El Segundo He requested information regarding the status of the park plans. Ms Jester stated staff has recommended that the applications be continued to October 28, 1999 because the agreements with Southern California Edison are still being worked out. She stated that Richard Williams in the Recreation and Parks Department could be contacted for further information regarding the plans for the parks. Mr Wilkerson stated that the residents have specific concerns regarding privacy, tree planting, distances, parking, etc. Ms. Jester clarified that the actions of the Planning Commission on the application if approved would be to have a Development Agreement that would just allow the City to enter into a lease agreement with Edison. Plans would then go to the Recreation and Parks Commission with public meetings, at which time the public could provide input on what the development plans would be for the parks This would then go to the City Council for final approval. Jerry Hurst, 404 Washington Street, El Segundo He asked if the suggestions of the public could be submitted. Ms Jester stated yes, and will have Mr Williams contact Mr Wilkerson Vice -Chair Wycoff closed the public hearing Commissioner Boulgarides requested an updated explanation concerning the status of the project Mr. Garry summarized the history and status of the project. In summary, the City would gain additional parks and a roadway and Southern California Edison would gain the opportunity for mini- storage Commissioner Kretzmer moved to continue EA-427 and EA -470 to the October MOTION 28, 1999 Meeting at 6 pm. Commissioner Boulgarides seconded. Passed 3 -0. Vice -Chair Wycoff presented Item 1 -4, Environmental Assessment EA-492 and EA-492 Precise Plan 99 -1 (Seventh Amendment to PP 12 -72) — Outdoor Dining and Parking). Address: 2041 Rosecrans Avenue, and 831 and 871 South Nash Street (Beach Cities Plaza). Applicant and Property Owners: Continental Development Corporation (Mr Jerry Saunders). Assistant Planner Paul Garry summarized the staff report as outlined in the agenda packet. He stated that the applicant submitted a letter requesting some minor modifications to the Draft Resolution The letter was distributed to 10 -14mm PC 2 020 DRAFT the Commission with a revised redline strikeout Resolution which includes minor numerical changes to the parking counts based on a more accurate calculation of the parking. Vice -Chair Wycoff opened the public hearing. Mr. Jerry Saunders, Continental Development Corporation He stated they have reviewed the staff report and Resolution No. 2455 as modified and are in agreement. They are requesting approval of the application and are available for questions He further indicated that the numerical corrections made by staff were to make everything compatible within the package so that all numbers were consistent. Commissioner Kretzmer questioned the parking structure at 871 South Nash Street, which has the least utilization, and seems to be at less than 50% full most all of the time Mr Saunders explained that this structure has a number of functions such as handicap parking, drop off for the theatre, one -hour parking for the retail establishments and hour and a half parking for the restaurant establishments which may not all be filled at any one time. He further explained that the upper floors prior to 6 p.m. are reserved for office parking tenants and the top floor is utilized for the parking for the Pacific Theatre employees and overload parking. Jack Greenspan, Linscott Law and Greenspan, 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Pasadena He explained Tables 3 and 4 in the packet and clarified that there are a total of 1,600 spaces at the 870 South Nash Street parking structure. Commissioner Boulgandes questioned why the required parking will be reduced Mr. Saunders stated they are trying to bring it in line with the concept that was there, and as a practical matter, they were getting to a false level of being full With the outdoor dining, they were down to 36 excess spaces, allowing some flexibility for using spaces that aren't currently being used. Commissioner Boulgandes pointed out that the lower levels of the parking are to a large extent empty He questioned whether spaces are being counted as available that can't be used by the general public Mr Saunders explained that they took the theatre, retail and office uses together and added up to the total on the model. He stated he can't disagree with the actual counts and the theatre owner agrees that the parking is working. He further pointed out that the jaywalking issues have been addressed, cutting down from 35% to 6% or 7% Vice -Chair Wycoff complemented the applicant on this improvement Commissioner Mahler questioned whether if holiday weekends or busy times would cause parking discrepancies. Mr Greenspan stated what is playing at the theatres is a large factor. He stated they take a fairly representative day to do the parking counts and go back and check the parking. Mr Greenspan pointed out the reason there is a large difference in the 10 -14mm PC 3 0 2 1 DRAFT numbers is that the original parking studies were environmental studies at worse case scenarios Vice -Chair Wycoff suggested that in the future that all sampling dates be concurred with the City staff. Mr. Greenspan agreed. Mr. Garry clarified that staff discussed with the applicant the dates to use in the counts Ms. Jester also clarified that the City's traffic engineer has reviewed the study and feels that the numbers are adequate Mr Saunders reviewed with the Commission on the diagram where the increased outdoor dining will be located He clarified that the total outdoor dining would never exceed 2,500 square feet, be contained within the envelope shown and include the current 900+ square feet outside of P. F. Chang. Commissioner Mahler asked d there are any projects expected such as food courts or restaurants Mr. Saunders stated they are talking to food service venders to attract the existing employees to use for less expensive dining Vice -Chair Wycoff closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kretzmer asked 9 the 2,500 square feet becomes the new development standard, and can the Director thereafter allow without coming back to the Planning Commission an additional 250 square feet of outdoor dining Ms Jester stated yes. However, they have already approved 120 square feet under the existing standard, and they could therefore, only increase another 130 square feet. The new baseline would be another 1,300 square feet. Commissioner Kretzmer expressed concern with increasing the amount and the discretionary authority growing, finding the protect larger than it was intended to be Vice -Chair Wycoff stated he likes the idea of the outdoor dining having flexibility and the traffic study sounds rational after the explanation from the consultant. Commissioner Mahler asked if there should be any proximity area developed. Ms Jester stated any new outdoor dining areas have to be submitted to plan check for review, and the Building and Safety Department and Fire Department would look it at to make sure the applicant is meeting all of the requirements. Also, there is a limited area where the dining areas can be provided that is defined by previous approvals. Assistant City Attorney John Luebberke pointed out that this is not a negative declaration Mr. Garry stated the title of the Resolution will be changed. Commissioner Kretzmer moved to adopt Resolution No. 2455 with a modified MOTION title and as amended by the comments received in the October 14, 1999 letter addressed to Mr Hansen from Mr. Saunders. Commissioner Mahler seconded Passed 4 -0 10 -14mn PC 4 () 2 2 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INTER - DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE Meeting Date: Thursday, October 14, 1998 TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James M. Hansen, Interim Director of Planning and Budding Safet THROUGH: Laurie B. Jester, Senior Planner STAFF PLANNER: Paul Garry, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment EA-492 and Precise Plan 99-1 (Seventh Amendment to PP 12 -721 Address: 2041 Rosecrans Avenue, and 831 and 871 South Nash Street (Beach Cities Plaza) Applicant: Continental Development Corporation (Mr. Jerry Saunders) REQUEST The Planning Division has received the above referenced application, which is a request of Continental Development Corporation to: 1) Amend the original Precise Plan (PP 12 -72), as subsequently modified, to increase the total amount of permitted outdoor dining area from 1,200 square feet to 2,500 square feet; 2) Reduce the total required parking for the Beach Cities Plaza from 1,330 parking spaces to 1,066 parking spaces based on the actual counts contained in the Final Status Report on traffic and parking and accept all of the findings of the Final Status Report; and, 3) Determine that the requested actions of the City arp categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEOA) requirements for the preparation of environmental documents, pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1, as a negligible expansion of an existing use. The PP 99 -1 B amendment is the seventh amendment to Precise Plan 12 -72. Pursuant to City practice, the Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council on the project, and the City Council will take final action on the applications. Staff also requests that the Planning Commission receive and file the Final Status Report per Condition of Approval No. 13 of City Council Resolution No. 3917 (3t0 Amendment), which provides the required twelve (12) month review of traffic, circulation, and parking impacts. 1 0 2„ RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission review the facts and required findings related to the proposed project and take the following actions: Determine that the proposed project is Categorical Exempt from CEQA review as a negligible expansion of an existing use (Section 15301, Class 1) for Environmental Assessment -350 (EA -350), 2 Recommend adoption of amendments to PP 12 -72; as originally approved by City Council Resolution No 2432, and, Approve draft Resolution No. 2455 recommending approval of the project to the City Council BACKGROUND Outdoor Dmma The purpose of the amendment would be to allow the expansion of outdoor dining facilities in the common plaza area of the Beach Cities Plaza project When the retail/entertainment development was approved, through PP 94 -1 (3" amendment), outdoor dining was not a permitted use within thiprecise plan area. Precise Plan Amendment 96 -1 (0 amendment) was approved by the City Council to allow outdoor dining in the Precise Plan area to exceed 200 square feet per establishment. However, a maximum of 1200 square feet of outdoor dining area was approved for the whole development. This amendment allowed P.F. Chang's China Bistro to develop a 964 square foot outdoor dining area. Amendment 96-1B (5"' amendment) codified all the current Beach Cities Plaza permitted uses and development standards. This amendment allows, in addition to the previously approved 1,200 square feet, additional outdoor dining opportunities consistent with the development standards in the underlying Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone Due to the applicants desire to establish an additional restaurant (Taiko, Japanese Cuisine) in the Beach Cities Plaza common plaza area, Continental Development requested an Administrative Determination (AD 99 -17) (attached) from the Director of Planning and Building Safety to grant a 10% minor modification to the development standards contained in the Precise Plan Pursuant to Section 4.0 B. (Development Standard Determinations) of PP 96 -1B, the Director may provide administrative relief up to ten (10) percent of any development standard. Based on the insignificant impacts associated with granting such administrative relief, the Director approved AD 99 -17 (attached) to increase the maximum outdoor dining area for the Beach Cities Plaza to 1,320 square feet. 'ased on this determination, a proposed Japanese restaurant (Taiko) would be able to develop an outdoor dining area in the common plaza area up to a maximum of 489 square feet. This would represent a combination of 236 square of the originally approved 1200 square feet of outdoor dining, not previously used by P.F Chang's China Bistro, 133 square feet allowed by the current underlying Mixed -Use South Zoning (twenty (20) percent of the 667 square foot indoor dining area), and an additional 120 square feet granted through the administrative determination. 2 The applicant desires to provide additional opportunities for additional restaurants to develop outdoor dining within the Beach Cities Plaza, without having to be limited to the current 20% up to 200 square foot requirement of the underlying MU -S Zone. By requesting pre - approval of an additional 1,047 square feet of outdoor dining area above that already approved, the applicant desires to save time when a potential tenant desires to construct additional outdoor dining areas by having the approval already in place Parkina The request to revise the required parking for the Beach Cities Plaza is predicated on the prior use of a Parking Demand Study to determine the actual parking need for the project While the Zoning Code requires 1476 parking spaces for the project, based on the current breakdown of uses, which incorporate all restaurants and outdoor dining areas, only 1,416 parking spaces are technically being provided (572 on site and 844 in parking structure on east side of Nash Street), based on the Zoning Code. This is due to the fact that the Zoning Code at the time of approval only allowed half of the 1,688 parking spaces in the parking structure on the east side of Nash Street to be used for shared parking for the Beach Cities Plaza The Zoning Code at the time of the approval had a fifty- percent limitation on shared parking — the current Zoning Code (Section 20.54.080) does not have such a limitation. Therefore, even though 2,260 parking spaces are physically available for use during the peak hours, only 1,416 are assigned by the previous approval to the Beach Cities Plaza. The six -month Traffic Study, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, contained a Parking Demand Model, which estimated that the actual parking demand for the Beach Cities Plaza would be 1,330 parking spaces during the 9:00 p.m. peak hour. The Final Status Report includes actual parking counts which indicate that the current parking demand (1,066 parked vehicles) is less than was predicted by the Parking Demand Model. Based on this analysis, the applicant, in a letter dated September 10, 1999, requested that the Site Data included as part of Sub Exhibit 3 to Exhibit "A" to Resolution No 4095 (6'" Amendment) be amended to reflect the current parking requirements and the current parking demand based on the Final Status Report. Approval of this amendment would establish a new baseline for the required parking for the project A revised Exhibit, "A ", which reflects the revised current parking calculations, is attached Previous Precise Plan Approvals The following is a description of the entitlements which have been approved for the Beach Cities Plaza- Precise Plan 12 -72 The Precise Plan was originally adopted on April 5, 1972 (Precise Plan 12 -72). Precise Plan 12 -72 approved "office, service -type facilities, and related parking." The location of the 871 South Nash Street parking structure on the western property line without any setback is one (1) example of a development standard that was established through adoption of Precise Plan 12- 72. P S 3 Precise Plan 73 -3 (1st Amendment) The Precise Plan was amended on May 29, 1973 (Precise Plan 73 -3). The amendment increased the floor area and altered the design of the parking facilities Precise Plan 74-10 (2nd Amendment) The Precise Plan was amended on January 7, 1974. This amendment eliminated the requirement for a deceleration lane on Rosecrans Avenue to accommodate a dnve -thru teller for a bank in the 2041 East Rosecrans Avenue building. Precise Plan 94 -1 (3rd Amendment) The Precise Plan was amended on May 2, 1995. This amendment allowed theaters as a permitted use, conversion of an office budding to retail/office, and provided for joint use parking at 870 South Nash Street. Additionally, the Precise Plan was amended to allow the construction of a theater building within the street side yard setback normally required for the Urban Mixed -Use Zone (MU). Precise Plan 96-1 (4th Amendment) The Precise Plan was amended on September 16, 1997. This amendment related to the parking structure stairway at 870 South Nash Street, the parking structure stairway directional signage at 870 South Nash Street, revisions to the approved Traffic Circulation Plan, and an approval to allow outdoor dining that exceeds 200 square feet for the P. F. Chang's China Bistro and other future restaurants up to a maximum of 1200 square feet. Precise Plan 96-1A (5th Amendment) The Precise Plan was amended on June 2, 1998. This amendment related to the relocation of the passenger drop -off area for the movie theaters, management of parking in the parking structure and surface parking lots on the property, and permitting the installation of amenities in the plaza area between the theater building and the retail, office restaurant building at 2041 Rosecrans Avenue. Precise Plan 96-1B (6th Amendment) i The Precise Plan was amended on November 4, 1998. This amendment allowed land uses to conform to the current Zoning Code for the underlying Zone: the "Urban Mated Use South (MU- S) Zone' and clarified that any (then current) codified development standards for the underlying Urban Mixed Use South (MU -S) Zone that are not specifically modified by the Precise Plan will be incorporated by reference and may be applied to improvements (uses and development standards) covered by the Precise Plan. The amendment provided for approval by the Director of Planning and Building Safety of minor modifications to the requirements of the Precise Plan. The project site is located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo approximately one (1) mile to the west of the San Diego Freeway [Interstate -405 (1- 405)]. The project area is approximately 6.03 acres (262,737 square feet). The project is generally bounded on the north G26 4 by heavy Industrial land uses, on the south by Rosecrans Avenue, on the east by Nash Street and on the west by heavy Industrial land uses. Local jurisdictions bordering or near the site Include the city of Manhattan Beach located Immediately south of Rosecrans Avenue and the City of Hawthorne located to the east of Aviation Boulevard. The site Is in the western portion of Continental Park. Continental Park Is a large office and Industrial park containing approximately 2 million square feet of office, research and development, hotel, health club, restaurant, retail, and movie theater uses The site is currently developed with a mixture of commercial, office, restaurant, movie theater, and parking structure uses. SURROUNDING AREA The area surrounding the project site is highly urbanized. Land uses consist of medium scale office, commercial, theater, restaurant, and retail uses. The Manhattan Marketplace Retail Center and a five -story office building housing a credit union are located to the south across Rosecrans Avenue Beyond the Hughes Credit Union budding is the Radisson Hotel with golf and tennis facilities. To the southwest of the project across Rosecrans Avenue lies the Manhattan Village Shopping Center. To the north of the site across the Santa Fe railroad right - of -way is undeveloped industrial land To the west are heavy industrial uses (Air Products and Allied Signal) To the east across Nash Street are office and restaurant uses. Surrounding land uses are as described in Table A. TABLE A SURROUNDING LAND USES Source City of El Segunoo CODE CONSIDERATIONS Precise Plan The existing building, uses and development standards were approved under a Precise Plan (PP 12 -72) in 1972. A Precise Plan is a term for a development application that is no longer used In the City for new projects. A Precise Plan would now be call a Specific Plan A Precise Plan amends the Zoning Map by establishing permitted uses and development standards that apply only to the area covered by the plan. No Variances are required for Precise Plans; the approval establishes the required development standards for a project. The adoption of a Precise Plan is a legislative act by the City Council, based upon recommendations by the Planning Commission There are no specific findings that must be 5 D'�6 A Land Use Zone North: Vacant Land Heavy Industrial (M -2) South: Office/Retail Planned Development (PD) (City of Manhattan Beach) East: Office/Parking Urban Mired -Use South (MU -S) West: Industrial Heavy Industrial (M -2) Source City of El Segunoo CODE CONSIDERATIONS Precise Plan The existing building, uses and development standards were approved under a Precise Plan (PP 12 -72) in 1972. A Precise Plan is a term for a development application that is no longer used In the City for new projects. A Precise Plan would now be call a Specific Plan A Precise Plan amends the Zoning Map by establishing permitted uses and development standards that apply only to the area covered by the plan. No Variances are required for Precise Plans; the approval establishes the required development standards for a project. The adoption of a Precise Plan is a legislative act by the City Council, based upon recommendations by the Planning Commission There are no specific findings that must be 5 D'�6 A adopted for an amendment of a Precise Plan The City must, in approving a Precise Plan or Precise Plan amendment, make findings related to the following three (3) areas: The California Environmental Quality Act; The consistency of the action with the City's General Plan; and, A finding that the action is necessary to carry out the general purpose of the Zoning Code CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) The State CEQA guidelines provide for a list of projects which have been determined by the State to not have a significant effect on the environment and which shall, therefore, be exempt from the requirements for the preparation of environmental documents. Staff has reviewed the applicable guidelines and determined that the proposed project qualifies as a Class 1 categorical exemption, pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA guidelines as a minor alteration of an existing structure involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing. The proposed amendments do not propose physical modifications to the development which would alter the basic configuration of the Development. Additional outdoor dining area could be located in an existing pedestrian only common plaza area. No significant environmental related changes have been mane to the Development Plan or Development Standards. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA review. INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS The project applications and plans were not circulated to all inter - departmental because the proposed amendments do not include any physical modifications to the property which would impact the area of jurisdiction of other City departments STAFF ANALYSIS Overall comments related to the request are presented below: It is the opinion of City staff that the requested actions of the City are categorically exempt from CEQA review, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA guidelines. 2 The Aooiication reauest is consistent with the Citv s General Plan: and. The City's General Plan designates the project site for Mixed -Use development. The project site is zoned in the Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone. The project reflects and is consistent with the designation and the development standards. 3 The ADDllcant request will not interfere %nth the Citv'a ahility to rarry nut tha nanaral n7�_ The proposed Amendment would increase the approved outdoor dining area in the common plaza area of the Precise Plan from 1200 square feet to 2,500 square feet. According to the submitted site plan, the proposed outdoor dining areas would be located in the common plaza area between the Pacific Theatre building and the retail/office budding at 2041 Rosecrans Avenue. Outdoor dining would also be permitted along the east side of the 2041 Rosecrans Avenue budding adjacent to Nash Street. All of the areas designated on the proposed plan for future outdoor dining are located in areas separated from vehicular traffic Based on staff's review of the parking demand analysis, provided in the Traffic and Parking Impact Analysis, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, dated September 27, 1999 (attached), it appears that the addition of 1,300 square feet of outdoor dining would not significantly impact the overall parking demand for the Beach Cities Plaza. While, it would increase the Zoning Code required parking by 17 parking spaces, the analysis concluded that the current parking demand is approximately 350 parking spaces less than the parking provided during the peak demand hour between 9:00 p.m. -10:00 p.m on Saturdays (Table 4 of Final Status Report). At other times of the day the surplus parking is even greater than 350 spaces. The Traffic and Parking Impact Analysis, also evaluated the potential impact of the additional outdoor dining on the existing traffic generation. The analysis concluded that the traffic volumes for the Beach Cities Plaza development are less that the levels predicted when the project was approved in 1995 (3'd amendment). Since, the traffic impacts when the project was approved were considered insignificant with the mitigation that was proposed at the time, it is reasonable to conclude that the current traffic volume is also at acceptable level. Based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) traffic generation rates for a quality restaurant, the addition of 1,300 square feet of outdoor dining would be expected to add approximately 14 average vehicle trip ends during the p.m. peak hour on a Saturday. If this level of traffic generation were added to the 1,070 vehicles that were counted during the p.m, peak hour on weekends, the total traffic volume would still be 1,084 vehicles, which is below the volume of 1278 vehicles analyzed, and determined to be acceptable in the original development proposal. Therefore, based upon the aforementioned factors, staff believes the addition of 1,300 square feet of outdoor dining will not significantly impact traffic circulation or parking and is within the development envelope approved by EA -350 and PP 94-1 (3rd Amendment). FINAL STATUS REPORT FINDINGS When the Beach Cities Plaza was originally approved, City Council Resolution No. 3917 included Condition of Approval No. 13, which required a six month and twelve month review of traffic conditions after the opening of the movie theaters. The six -month review was prepared on August 26, 1997. Upon approval of the 4"' Amendment (PP 96 -1), through Condition No. 15 in City Council Resolution No 4034, the twelve month traffic review was required to be conducted between six months and a year after the opening of the P F Chang's China Bistro restaurant. Finally, Condition No. 3 of City Council Resolution No 4064 (5"' Amendment) added the requirement that parking counts be included in the final traffic study The Final Status Report, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, on August 2, 1999, is intended to satisfy all of the above referenced traffic study requirements. The Final Status Report addresses pedestrian traffic, vehicular traffic, and parking. Briefly, the report found that the problem of jaywalking across Nash Street has been significantly reduced r..9 f. - 7 from 35.5 percent of Nash Street crossings to 6.7 percent The construction of the barriers on the east edge of the common plaza area and increased signage adjacent to the parking structure on the east side of Nash Street have both contributed to the improvement in pedestrian safety. As indicated above, the Final Status Report found that both parking demand and traffic volume is lower than originally predicted The City's Traffic Engineer consultant, Hartzog & Crabill, Inc., has reviewed the Final Status Report and concurs with the findings. Based on the findings of the Final Status Report, staff supports the applicants request to amend the Site Plan parking calculations to use the current, measured parking count as the required parking for the Beach Cities Plaza. The current conditions represent an almost complete buildout of the project. The theaters are fully occupied, and the parking counts were taken during the peak summer attendance period. The 2041 Rosecrans Avenue office/ retail building is also almost fully occupied. The Final Status Report does not incorporate the proposed new Japanese restaurant (Taiko) to be located on the west side of the 2041 Rosecrans Avenue budding, but the analysis provided above indicates that this additional use should not significantly impact the parking requirements Therefore, it is not likely that the Beach Cities Plaza will experience a significant increase in parking demand in the near future which would result in a shortage of parking, either on -site (west of Nash Street facilities) prior to 6.00 p.m or overall (east and west side of Nash Street facilities) after 6:00 p.m. CONCLUSION Staff recommends thikVthe Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed amendments to the Beach Cities Plaza Precise Plan to increase the permitted amount of outdoor dining from 1,200 to 2,500 square feet and to revise the required parking for the project from 1,330 to 1,066 parking spaces based on the Final Status Report. EXHIBITS A PY-ab R esel.i4.e1 P,_. 9455_ B Precise Plan and Development Standards for Continental Development Corporation's Beach Cities Plaza Project. C Letter from Applicant, Requesting Minor Modification, dated September 16, 1999. D Administrative Determination 99 -17 letter, dated September 23, 1999. E Letter from Applicant, Requesting Parking Modification, dated September 10, 1999 F Traffic and Parking Impact Analysis, by Unscott, Law, & Greenspan, dated September 27, 1999. G Final Status Report, by Unscott, Law, & Greenspan, dated August 2, 1999 H Applications J Site Plan Prepared by Paul Garry, Assistant Planner 8 r,2cf - Reviewed by L '. Ek� tijom— Laune B. Jest r, Senior Planner Reviewed and approved as to form- John Luebberke, Assistant City Attorney Approved by. �tm s M Hansen er Director of Planning and Building Safety P.VroJ"%401.4251ea4011sag01 b.s r 14 o3Q PRECISE PLAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND STANDARDS [PRECISE PLAN 96-IB (PP 96 -1B) AND Em moNMENTAL ASSESSMENT -401B (EA-401B)] CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION'S BEACH CITIES PLAZA EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA • ,_ , y � Cm of EL SEovNDo 350 MAW STREET EL SEGuNDo, CALIFoRNIA 90245 PREPARED BY. VISTA 1278 GLPNNEnE STREET, Surm 110 LAGUNA BEACH, CALffomm 92561 ADOPTED: NovEMBER 4, 1998 031 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION Background ............................. Project Location and Setting .... 2.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN Introduction ......... Development Plan 30 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Introduction ........... ............................... Development Standards ...................... Landscaping ........... ............................... Off - Street Parking and Loading Spaces Signs..................... .............................., 4 0 ADMINISTRATION ........ APPENDICES 1 -1 ............................. 1-1 1 -1 2 -1 ............................. 2 -1 .. ............................... 2 -1 ........ 3 -1 ................... 3-1 ........ I.......... 3-1 ..................... 3 -2 ..................... 3-2 ..................... 3 -2 .. 4-1 Introduction............................................................................ ............................... 4-1 Precise Plan Administration ................................................. ............................... 4-1 California Environmental Quality Act Compliance .................. ............................... 42 A — Resolution No 2432, Precise Plan 12 -72 — Original City Council Approval B — Resolution No 749, Precise Plan 12 -72 — Original Planning Commission Recommendation C — Resolution No, 2483, Precise Plan 3 -73 — City Council Approval 1" Amendment D — Resolution No. 773, Precise Plan 3 -73 — Planning Commission Recommendation 1" Amendment E. — Resolution No. 2601, Precise Plan 74-10 — City Council Approval 2nd Amendment F — Resolution No 832, Precise Plan 74 -10 —Planning Commission Recommendation 2"d Amendment G. — Resolution No. 3917, Precise Plan 94-1 — City Council Approval 3'd Amendment H. — Resolution No. 4034, Precise Plan 96 -1— City Council Approval 4d' Amendment I — Resolution No. 4064, Precise Plan 96 -1A —City Council Approval 5"' Amendment ii C32 Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 I :011: M Regional Location Local Vicinity Beach Cities Plaza - Development Plan Beach Cities Plaza - Elevation Beach Cities Plaza - Circulation Plan iii 1 -2 1 -3 2 -3 FM! ..................... I.............. 2 -5 433 Table A Table B Table C Table D Table E Table F TABLES Key Contact Persons ...................... ............................... List of Property Owners ................ ............................... Objectives.................................... ............................... Project Statistics ...................... ............................... Off -Street Parking ......................... ............................... California Environmental Quality Act Compliance ..... ry .................. 1-4 .................. 1 -5 ................ 1 -6 ,)_r .................. 2 -7 ................ 4-2 034 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Beach Cities Plaza Precise Plan Development Plan and Standards 96 -1B (PP 96 -1B) are intended to provide for a more efficient use of land and a better community environment by utilizing more imaginative and innovative planning concepts than are possible under conventional zoning. The precise plan was established to provide specific land uses, and density and intensity limitations on this property. The precise plan takes advantage of the conventional zoning in the establishment of development standards that are based on the City of El Segundo Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) District. PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING Beach Cities Plaza is located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo approximately one (1) mile to the west of the San Diego Freeway [Interstate -405 (I- 405)]. Beach Cities Plaza is approximately 6.03 acres (262,900 square feet). The regional location of Beach Cities Plaza is provided on Exhibit 1, and Exhibit 2 provides a local vicinity map Beach Cities Plaza is a portion of Continental Park. Continental Park is bounded by Rosecrans Avenue on the south, Nash Street on the east, an industrial facility (Air Products) on the west, and railroad tracks on the north. Local jurisdictions bordering or near the precise plan include the City of Manhattan Beach located immediately south of Rosecrans Avenue and the City of Hawthorne located to the east of Aviation Boulevard. The precise plan is in the southwestern portion of Continental Park. Continental Park is a large office and industrial park containing approximately 2 million square feet of office, research and development, hotel, health club, restaurant, retail, and movie theater uses. Beach Cities Plaza has been historically used for general commercial uses since 1972. The City's General Plan designates the site for nuxed use (Urban Mixed Use - South) development. Continental Plaza is located within a highly urbanized environment. The topography of the site is fairly level and contains no unique geologic features. Landscaping is limited to the areas adjacent to South Nash Street on the east, the rear yard setback on the north, and along Rosecrans Avenue to the south. i -i 035 REGIONAL LOCATION BEACH Crms PLAZA CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CITY OF EL SEGUNDO VISTA NO SCALE EXHiBTT 1 036 Sim��/alley san a, ° a Ills oPaeok na o / Ctatewo m Misaln HIIU ea . B.Prdvidi ' , vnteos h`rye-v'<S Valllry ° PMRond Cr ° VhduB Canoga Part ° q *Ronda °� Bank °��d"'a Thousand Oaks t ° Woodland HI � tebons SMrMan Ca l Dlanal - sadena Monrovia unNMaal Arcadia oD Cornell San Marto 0 PaaMar6� oT.mp.C{ty. oPanYa rr ° 405 ��] Alka Baldwin B� Nos El Mon Q Poem P °B � ° r4de es S� I Monte outlr Bi' .rtaea o o tt la # Ali nt8 N.IShts ° Marina Dal Ray ° C�r� a �.1 o 8610 ° 1, W IMor Playa Dal Ray l{dalry 77 d Doan � ° e um Whittier Prolea sure 'Yo Saran Fa 8 M 8"und a ° WMav La Ml do ° Con e Manhattan Beach e P o o B.IMowx N.m osa Beach L. t.wWd „ „ ° Park "s � T oV o o,�lla Gardens e Pala V.raM EatatM V o°p I e Stanton R.MnB Han, a Garden Grove Rome" Palm V RoWn N • �. ac s e MI Mlaway EBy 0 SunMt Boom V W&Vwvtm 'v3 p�d�o C C 1995 D°Lonne REGIONAL LOCATION BEACH Crms PLAZA CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CITY OF EL SEGUNDO VISTA NO SCALE EXHiBTT 1 036 1.0 INTRODUCTION TABLE A KEY CONTACT PERSONS The Lead Agency Contact: Mr. Bret B. Bernard, AICP Director of Planning and Building Safety Planning and Building Safety Department City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, California 90245 Phone (310) 322 -4670, ext. 211 Facsimile (310) 322 -4167 Project Sponsor: Mr. Jerry Saunders Vice President - Planning Continental Development Corporation 2041 Rosecrans Avenue El Segundo, California 90245 Phone (310) 640 -1520 Facsimile (310) 414 -9279 Consultant: Mr. Fred Talarico Principal Planner VISTA 1278 Clenneyre Street, Suite 110 Laguna Beach, Caldomia 92651 Phone (949) 494 -6562 Facsimile (949) 494 -3150 Source. VISTA 1-4 r � Source VISTA TABLE B PROPERTY OWNER Continental Development Corporation 2041 Rosecrans Avenue El Segundo, California 90245 1 -5 1.0 INTRODUCTION Objectives 1.0 INTRODUCTION TABLE C OBJECTIVES To clarify permitted land uses in the Beach Cities Plaza Development Plan area. 2. Clarification and predictability of development standards that were not modified by the Precise Plan. 3. Establishment of procedures that will allow future development under the Precise Plan to be competitive, in terms of cost and timing, with similar development elsewhere in the MU -S Zone. Source- Continental Development Corporation 1-6 r 4 0 2.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION The Beach Cities Plaza Development Plan provides for the development of approximately 6.03 acres The Development Plan is provided as Exhibit 3, Elevations as Exhibit 4, and the Circulation Plan as Exhibit 5, and as detailed in the frill scale drawings on file in the Planning Division. DEVELOPMENT PLAN Permitted Uses Permitted Uses in the Beach Cities Plaza Precise Plan are as established by the Urban Mixed -Use South (Mil -S) Zone, Section 20.38.020 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. Additionally, the following uses are permitted subject to the review and approval of the Director of Planning and Building Safety: 1 Incidental uses such as permanent tables, chairs, signs, outdoor retail operations, push carts, kiosks, and other similar outdoor amenities, provided each use is located in the area designated for incidental uses on the Development Plan (Exhibit 3). 2. Additional uses such as outdoor dining in accordance with Resolution 4034. Permitted Accessory Uses Permitted Accessory Uses in the Beach Cities Plaza Precise Plan are as established by the Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone, Section 20.38.025 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. Uses Subject to an Administrative Use Permit Uses Subject to an Administrative Use Permit in the Beach Cities Plaza Precise Plan are as established by the Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone, Section 20.38.030 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. Uses Subiect to a Conditional Use Permit Uses Subject to a Conditional Use Permit in the Beach Cities Plaza Precise Plan are as established by the Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone, Section 20.38.040 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. 2 -1 Cot 2.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN Adult Business Permits Adult Business Permits in the Beach Cities Plaza Precise Plan are as established by the Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone, Section 20.38 045 and Chapter 20.80 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. Prohibited Uses The Prohibited Uses in the Beach Cities Plaza Precise Plan are as established by the Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone, Section 20.38.050 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. 2 -2 04 iilr I ii , j f !q• • h' �t ■ ■ pl - - - - - -- . - �O F U a � F i U �t ¢t z ¢I o �.y avO � A � F � 5 W `" a w � w W F ■ ■ pl - - - - - -- . - �O F U a � F M F tl rw r.� w U z o �.y avO � A � F � 5 W `" a w � w W F U z W U A �43 0 v Ga O U � z U O H 0 N Uoa a F" VAo W �U W z a W U 044 t p . w •s tT i� � I n a 3 .7 l i 1 I �. , 0 v Ga O U � z U O H 0 N Uoa a F" VAo W �U W z a W U 044 ��' LL�;H1.1i1T11j • ; �iI K: 3 !1 lih!! ;• ° iii I sd; ii 16�M Z O in p F o a U A Mai U � z m a F-+ o ^� N U O U A o F U U z U 045 2.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN TABLED PROJECT STATISTICS TOTAL PROJECT SITE SIZE 6.03 ACRES (262,900 SQUARE FEET) STRUCTURE AT 65,000 SQUARE FEET 831 SOUTH NASH STREET (THEATER) STRUCTURE AT 83,000 SQUARE FEET 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE Source Continental Development Corporation and City of El Segundo (Exhibit 3) 2 -6 (' Q f TABLE E 2.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN OFF - STREET PARKING SUMMARY Source Continental Development Corporation (Exhibit 3) 2 -7 0 4 7 asrStree Surface 177 47 0 224 Parking 0 348 844 1,192 Structure Total 177 395 844 1,416 Parking Spaces Source Continental Development Corporation (Exhibit 3) 2 -7 0 4 7 3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS INTRODUCTION The Beach Cities Plaza Precise Plan Development Standards apply to all uses in the Precise Plan. Except as noted below, all uses within the Precise Plan shall comply with the Site Development Standards in Section 20.38.060 of the El Segundo Municipal Code, or the current comparable Zoning Code section. SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - 20.38.060 A. General Provisions All uses shall comply with the provisions of Section 20.38.060 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. B. Lot Area The minimum lot area shall comply with the provisions of Section 20.38.060 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. C. Heieht Buildings and structures shall comply with the provisions of Section 20.38.060 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. D. Setbacks All setbacks shall comply with the provisions of Section 20.38.060 of the El Segundo Municipal Code, except as modified by the Development Plan (Exhibit 3). E. Lot Frontage Each lot in the Precise Plan shall comply with the provisions of Section 20.38.060 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. F. Building Area The total floor area shall comply with the provisions of Section 20.38.060 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. 3 -1 Gob 3.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS G. Walls/Fences All walls and fences shall comply with the provisions of Section 20.38.060 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. H. Access All access shall comply with the provisions of Section 20.38.060 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. LANDSCAPING - 20.38.070 All landscaping shall comply with the provisions of Section 20.38.070 of the El Segundo Municipal Code, except as modified by the Development Plan (Exhibit 3). OFF - STREET PARKING AND LOADING SPACES - 2038.080 All off - street parking and loading spaces shall comply with the provisions of Section 20.38.080 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. Additionally, the following provisions shall apply: 1. Valet parking for any use shall be permitted and encouraged. SIGNS - 20.38.090 All signs shall comply with the provisions of Section 20.38.090 of the El Segundo Municipal Code, except as shown in the approved Master Sign Plan. 3.2 049 4.0 AmmsTRATION INTRODUCTION The Beach Cities Plaza Precise Plan shall be administrated in accordance with the City Municipal Code except as noted herein. PRECISE PLAN ADMINISTRATION Administrative Determinations Administrative Determinations shall comply with Section 20.72.020 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. A. Land Use Determinations The Director of Planning and Building Safety may grant administrative determinations related to uses in accordance with Section 20.72.020 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. B. Development Standards Determinations The Director of Planning and Building Safety may grant administrative determinations related to development standards, provided any administrative relief shall not exceed 10% of any development standard. Administrative Use Permit Filin¢ and Review Process Administrative Use Permit Filing and Review Process shall comply with Section 20.72.040 of the El Segundo Municipal Code Decision Decision shall comply with Section 20.72.040 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. Findines for Approval Findings for Approval shall comply with Section 20 72.045 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. Expeditious Review Process Expeditious Review Process shall comply with Section 20.72.050 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. 4-t 050 4.0 ADNMISTRAT[ON Plannine Commission Review Planning Commission Review shall comply with Section 20.72.060 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. Appeals Appeals shall comply with Section 20.72.070 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT COMPLIANCE The Precise Plan (as previously amended) was approved in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines (Guidelines), and City policies adopted to implement the CEQA and the Guidelines. CEQA clearance has been granted by the City as follows: TABLE F CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT COMPLIANCE Retail/Office /Restaurant and other land uses permitted in the MU -S Zone. Theater 80,000 square feet net floor area 18- screens (3,550 seats) The CEQA clearance indicated above is not reflective of the maximum square feet permitted by the Precise Plan, which is 341,770 square feet (262,400 square feet of lot area times 1.3 FAR = 341,770 square feet). Additional CEQA clearance may be granted in one (1) of the following two (2) methods. Exceed Clearance: Approval of an amendment to this Precise Plan in accordance with CEQA and City requirements to exceed the thresholds indicated in Table F. 4-2 051 4.0 ADMINISTRATION 2. Within Clearance: Approval of an administrative finding by the Director of Planning and Building Safety in accordance with Section 4.0 of this Precise Plan. The Director of Planning and Building Safety must find that the proposed use and density/intensity does not exceed the CEQA clearance established in Table F. 43 J,`521 APPENDIX A RESOLUTION NO. 2432 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS SPECIFIC (PRECISE) PLAN NO. 12, WHEREAS, under the provisions of Title 20 (The Comprehen- save Zoning Ordinance) of the "El Segundo Municipal Code" and the laws of the State of California applicable to such matters, Continental Develop- ment Corporation has filed its petition for the adoption of Specific (Precise) Plan No. 12; and WHEREAS, said Plan is for property located in the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California. more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the center line of Roscrans Avenue (100 feet wide), said line also being the southerly line of Section 16, Township 3 South, Range 14 West, SBB & M, and the center line of Nash Street (80 feet wide); thence North 8°" 57' 34" West a distance of 338.00 feet; thence North 00 02' 26" East a distance of 50 feet to a point in the northerly line of Rosecrans Ave- nue, said point being the true point of beginning; thence South 890 57' 34" East a distance of 268.00 feet to a point of tangency with a curve concave Northwest, having a cen- tral angle of 90° and a radius of 30.00 feet; thence along an arc of said curve a distance of 47.12 feet to a point of tangency with a line parallel to and 40.00 feet westerly of the said center line of Nash Street; thence North 0. 02' 26" East along the westerly line of Nash Street a distance of 614.07 feet to a point of tangency with a curve concave westerly having a central angle of 10° 13' 42" and a radius of 2, 122.09 feet; thence along an are of said curve a dis- tance of 378.83 feet to a point in the southwesterly line of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company's right -of -way; thence South 430 25' 18" West along said southwesterly line a distance of 384.77 feet to a point; thence South 00 02' 26" West a distance of 741.24 feet to the true point of beginning; and WHEREAS, said Plan was submitted to the Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo, and after a hearing duly and regularly held, was approved and recommended for adoption by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of El Segundo has duly and regularly held a public hearing on said Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of El Segundo has now acquired jurisdiction to adopt this resolution; 053 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That said Specific (Precise) Plan No. 12 herem- above referred to as approved by the Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo in its Resolution No. 749, be and the same is hereby approved and adopted upon the following conditions: (1) That the driveway north of Building No. 5 be relocated to align with the right -of -way of Park Place: (2) That the loading spaces located at the rear of Buildings Nos. 4 and 5 shall be relocated so as not to interfere with internal vehicu- lar circulation; No. 3; (3) That two loading spaces shall be provided for Building (4) That, if, at a later date, it is determined by the City that a traffic hazard exists as a result of the location of the driveways on Rosecrans Avenue or Nash Street, the applicant, at its expense, shall correct such problem to the satisfaction of the City; (5) That this Specific (Precise) Plan does not show the interior ' design of the parking garages, therefore, approval of said Plan shall be sub- ject to the developer providing a minimum of 653 off - street parking spaces. If the use of any building is changed to a use requiring more off- street park- ing spaces, such additional required spaces shall be provided; (6) That specific trash and rubbish storage areas for each build- ing shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of the Director of Public Works; (7) That a deceleration lane on Rosecrans Avenue be dedicated and improved according to the requirements of the City Engineer in substantially the location and dimension shown on the plan dated March 22, 1972 and filed with the City Clerk on March 27, 1972; (8) That construction shall commence within one year from March 27, 1972, and that this Specific (Precise) Plan shall become null and -2- C54 void if construction has not commenced within said time. SECTION 2. That the applicant is informed that the City Council does not, by this action, intend to impair its authority to modify the traffic and circulation restrictions in the neighborhood of applicant's property if the need arises to make such modification. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to endorse the said Plans as hereby approved and adopted by the City Council. Said Plans are on file in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection and by this reference incorporated in this resolution and made a part hereof. adoption. SECTION 4. That this resolution shall become effective upon SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, shall enter the same in the book of original resolu- tions of said City, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED � ATTEST: Jane D. Hough ity er (SEAL) By: eputy -3- X55 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) COUNTY t.. LOS ANGELES, ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO. ) I, JANE D. HOUGH, , City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the whole number of members of the City Council of the said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2432 was duly passed and adopted by the said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of the said Council held on the 27th day of March 197 2 and that the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Balmer, McGill, Morgan, Nagel and Mayor Stephens; NOES: Councilmen None ABSENT: Councilmen None WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 5th day of April 19 2 y Clerx of a City of egua o California (SEAL) P 5 6 APPENDIX B RESOLUTION NO. 749 A RESOLUTION OF TIM PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST FOR A SPECIFIC (PRECISE) PLAN, WITH CONDITIONS, FROM CONTINENTAL DEVELOP- - MENT CORPORATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS TO BE USED FOR OFFICES, RESTAURANT, SAVINGS AND LOAN, AND RELATED PARKING FACILITIES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NASH STREET AND ROSECRANS AVENUE. WHEREAS, an application was received on January 7, 1972, from Continental Development Corporation, 4519 Admiralty Way, Suite 201, Marina del Rey, for a specific (precise) plan to construct three commercial buildings to be used for offices, service -type facilities, and related parking facilities, on property generally located at the northwest corner of Nash Street and Rosecrans Avenue, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the centerline of Rosecrans Avenue (100 feet wide), said line also being the southerly line of Section 18, Township 3 South, Range 14 West, SBB 6 M, and the centerline of Nash Street (80 feet wide), thence north 890 57' 34" west a distance of 338.00 feet, thence north 00 02' 26" east a distance of 50 feet to a point in the northerly line of Rosecrans Avenue, said point being the true point of beginnings thence south 89 57' 34" east a distance of 268.00 feet to a point of tangency with a curve concave northwest, having a central angle of 900 and a radius of 30.00 feet; thence along an arc of said curve a distance of 47.12 feet to a point of tangency with a line parallel to and 40.00 feet westerly of the said centerline of Nash Street, thence north 00 02' 26" east along the westerly line of Nash Street a distance of 614.07 feet to a point of tangency with a curve concave westerly having a central angle of 100 13' 42" and a radius of 2,122.09 feet, thence along an arc of said curve a distance of 378.83 feet to a point in the southwesterly line of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway right -of -way, thence south 430 25' 18" west along said southwesterly line a distance of 384.77 feet to a point, thence south 00 02' 26" west a distance of 741.24 feet to the true point of becinning; and C 5 7 sue., naa WHEREAS, U... Planning Commission did hold, pu .uant to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, in the City of E1 Segundo on January 26, 1972; and WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons to present testimony or documentary evidence both for and against the proposed request; and WHEREAS, Gordon T. Stephens and George Phillips spoke, and no other persons offered to speak; NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED, that as a result of said hearing, the following facts were established: 1. The subject site contains some 6.1 acres or 262.240 square feet of area and is zoned M -2, Heavy Manufacturing. 2. The property to the east across Nash Street is zoned M -2 and is vacant except for a small bank building and related parking facilities. 3. Property to the west across the railroad tracks is zoned M -2 and developed for heavy industrial purposes. 4. Property to the north is developed with light industrial buildings which are presently being used for offices. HE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that as a result of said hearing, the commission finds as follows: 1. Section 20.50.020 PURPOSE OF PRECISE PLAN, of the "E1 Segundo Municipal Code" reads as follows: "Whersin'the zoning map establishes only zone boundaries and the text of the title establishes the permitted use of land in the various zones and the conditions applica- ble to the use, a precise plan, as the term is employed in this chapter, has a two fold (sic) purpose: "(1) To apply the provisions and requirements of the title in precise detail by means of a map, including possible streets, alleys and other public dedications, the establishment of which would be accomplished in the manner otherwise provided by law; the design and place- ment of essential related facilities such as off- street parking, loading and Lnloading areas, points of ingress and egress, particularly related to bordering traffic flow; placement and arrangement of buildings; and other subjects not included in this title but which are r 5 8 assent--.L to public safety and general w, are, such as controlling the pattern and flow of traffic and such other related details as represent modern specialized land development and use. "(2) Similar plans for the consolidated use of subdivided property, the dimensions, shape and size of which do not individually land themselves advantageously to any form of modern land utilization. "The precise plans shall be adopted in the manner prescribed for amending the zoning map, and the precise plans, when so adopted, shall constitute an amendment of the zoning map as to zone classification, where involved, and the details of the precise plan shall supersdde and shall take the place of the requirements and conditions upon the use of land as established by this title, insofar as the property contained in the precise plan is concerned. "A precise plan, when adopted as herein provided, shall be considered as being a precise plan within the full meaning of the state Conservation and Planning Act and, because the adoption of the precise plan accomplishes both the amendment of the zoning map and the establish- ment of detailed subjects other than zoning matters, separate but concurrent proceedings shall be employed. The resulting precise plan shall be separately recorded both as a component of the comprehensive master plan and as an amendment to this title." 2. The proposed commercial buildings will have no detri- mental_effects on the abutting properties or uses if developed in accordance with the conditions as set forth herein. AND FURTHER RESOLVED, that in view of the above facts and findings, and pursuant to Section 20.50.020 of the "E1 Segundo Municipal Code," the Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of the request for a specific (precise) plan from Continental Development Corporation, 4519 Admiralty Way, Suite 201, Marina del Rey, to construct three commercial buildings to be used for offices, service -type facilities, and related park- ing facilities, on property generally located at the northwest corner of Nash Street and Rosecrans Avenue, subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1. That the driveway north of Building No. 5 be relocated to align with the right -of -way of Park Place. 0 IN9 942 R11 2. The loading spaces located at the rear of Building Nos. 4 and 5 shall be relocated so as not to interfere with internal vehicular circulation. 3. Two loading spaces shall be provided for Building No. 3. 4. If, at a later date, it is determined by the City that a traffic hazard exists as a result of the location of the driveways on Rosecrans Avenue or Nash Street, the applicant, at its expanse, shall correct such problem to the satisfaction of the City. 5. The plans submitted to this Commission do not show the interior design of the parking garages. Therefore, the approval of the development should be subject to the developer providing a minimum of 653 off- street parking spaces. If the use of a building is changed to a use requiring more off - street parking spaces, such additional required spaces shall be provided. 6. Specific trash and rubbish storage areas for each build- ing shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of the Director of Public Works. 7. In accordance with Section 20.96.020 EXPIRATION., of the "E1 Segundo Municipal Code," the applicant has one year from the date of approval of the specific (precise) plan application by the City Council in which to exercise the application. if not exercised within that time, the specific (precise) plan becomes null and void. AND FURTHER RESOLVED, according to the "E1 Segundo Municipal Code," within ten days following the adoption of this resolution, the secretary of the Planning Commission shall mail a copy of this resolution to the applicant at the address shown on the application and to any other person requesting a copy of same. FINALLY RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution shall be forwarded to the City Council for its action as prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of ianuaa. 1972. 1 / Philip A. Hu y, Acting air- Ernest B. Reid man of the Planning Comjnission Director of Planning of the City of E1 Segundo, City of E1 Segundo California California QGO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, ERNEST B. REID, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo, do hereby certify that the fore- going is a full, true, and correct copy of a resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, California, and that said resolution which was approved at the Planning Commission meeting of January 26. 1972, and was so passed by the following vote: AYES: Chairman Huey, Commissioners Charland, Wiegers and Woodward NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINS None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this26th day of January. 1972. I _` • I t tip i l� ?N Ernest B. Reid. Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, California 190411 APPENDIX C �,,ry: RESOLUTION NO. 2483 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC (PRECISE) PLAN NO. 12. a WHEREAS, on March 27, 1972, the City Council of the City of El Segundo adopted Resolution No. 2432, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS SPECIFIC (PRECISE) PLAN NO. 12. ", and by said Resolution, adopted Specific (Precise) Plan No. 12; and WHEREAS, on March 2, 1973, an application was made by Continental Development Corporation to amend said Plan; and WHEREAS, said Plan is for the property described as: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the center line of Rosecrans Avenue (100 feet widel, said line also being the southerly line of Section 18, Township 3 South, Range 14 West, SSB & M. and the center line of Nash Street (80 feet wide); thence North 89' 57' 34" West a distance of 338.00 feet; thence North 0' 02' 26" East a distance of 50 feet to a point in the northerly line of Rosecrans Ave- nue, said point being the true point of beginning; thence South 89. 57' 34" East a distance of 268. 00 feet to a point of tangency with a curve concave Northwest, having a cen- tral angle of 90' and a radius of 30. 00 feet; thence along an are of said curve a distance of 47.12 feet to a point of tangency with a line parallel to and 40.00 feet westerly of the said center line of Nash Street; thence North 0. 02' 26" East along the westerly line of Nash Street a distance of 614.07 feet to a point of tangency with a curve concave westerly having a central angle of 10. 13' 42" and a radius of 2,122.09 feet; thence along an arc of said curve a dis- tance of 378.83 feet to a point in the southwesterly line of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company's right -of -way; thence South 43. 25' 18" West along said southwesterly line a distance of 384. 77 feet to a point; thence South V 02' 26" West a distance of 741.24 feet to the true point of beginning, and said amendment to the Plan was submitted to the Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo, and after hearing duly and regularly held, was approved and recommended for adoption by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of El Segundo bas duly and regularly held a public hearing on said amendment to said Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of El Segundo has acquired jurisdiction to adopt this resolution; )14;' C62 ..' I.•V NOW. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL uF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO. CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That said Amendment to Specific (Precise) Plan No. 12 hereinabove referred to as approved by the Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo in its Resolution No. 773, be and the same is hereby approved and adopted upon the following conditions: 1. That a toll gate or any other such device shall not be placed at or near the vehicular entrances to Building No. 4 in any way that could restrict the free passage of vehicles through to the rear of the first floor of the structure. The location of any toll gate shall be approved by the Director of Building Safety. 2. That Building No. 4 shall be provided with two loading spaces or one loading space with a minimum of 800 square feet, and be so located e so as not to interfere with internal vehicular circulation, such location shall be approved by the Director of Building Safety. 3. That the loading spaces shall be indicated on the floor plan for level one, prior to issuance of the permit. 4. _That the development be required to provide a minimum of 723 off- street parking spaces and that if the use of any building is changed to a use requiring more off - Street parking spaces, such additional required spaces shall be provided. 5. Trash and rubbish storage areas for Building No. 4 shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of the Director of Public Works. 6. The applicant shall, in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 2472, pay all costs incurred by the City for the preparation of the NEGA- TIVE DECLARATION on this project. SECTION 2. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to endorse the Amendment to said Plan as hereby approved and adopted by the City Council. Said Plan is on file in the office of the City Clerk for public inspec- tion and by this reference incorporated in this resolution and made a part hereof. SECTION 3. That this resolution shall become effective upon adop- tion. 6'M 1,J) I X63 SL.. PION 4. That the City Clerk shall cer, y to the passage and adoption of this resolution: shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said City, and shall make a minute of the passage and adop- tion thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 29th day of May 1973. j!�! Z13 a1A.....at. mayor ot t e ty of egun do. Qalffornia. ATTEST: -7 city Clerk P (SEAL) -3- evVt 064 STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ) - COUNT X LOS ANGELES. } SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO. 1 1, JANE D. HOUGH, , City Clark of the City of El Segundo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the whole number of members of the City Council of the said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2483 was duly passed and adopted by the said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of the said Council held on the 29th day of May 1pq 3 and that the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote; AYES: Councilmen McGill, Morgan, Nagel and Mayor Balmer NOES: Councilmen None ABSENT: Councilmen None NOT VOTING: Councilman Stephens. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 30th day of May . 19'( g (SEAL) 14-e— y LaerX or y 01 ziebegundo California C65 APPENDIX D RESOLUTION 90. 773 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA RECOMMUDING ADOPTION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO PRECISE PLAN N0. 12 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NASH STREET AND ROSECRANS AVENUE WITHIN SAID CITY. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of E1 Segundo, California, on March 27, 1972 adopted Resolution No. 2432 approving with cattain conditions Precise Plan No. 12 for Continental bevelopment corporation; MM WHEREAS, an application has been received by the Planning Depart- ment from Continental Development Corporation to amend Precise Plan No. 12 by changing the design of parking facilities and office spaces of said Plan; and WHEREAS, the property involved in the above application is located at the Northwest corner of Nash Street and Rosecrans Avenue, commonly known as 871 Nash Street, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the centerline of Rosecrans Avenue (100 feet wide), said line also being the southerly line of Section 18, Township 3 South, Range 14 West, SBB & M, and the centerline of Nash Street (80 feet wide), thence north 890 57' 34" West a distance of 338.00 feet, thence north 00 02' 26" East a distance of 50 feet to a point in the northerly line of Rosecrans Avenue, said point being the true point of beginning; thence South 89 57' 34" East a distance of 268.00 feet to a point of tangency with a curve concave Northwest, having a central angle of 900 and a radius of 30.00 feet; thence along an arc of said curve a distance of 47.12 feet to a point of tangency with a line parallel to and 40.00 feet Westerly of the said centerline of Nash Street, thence North 00 02' 26" East along the westerly line of Nash Street, a distance of 614.07 feet to a point of tangency with a curve concave westerly having a central angle of 100 13' 42" and a radius of 2,122.09 feet, thence along an are of said curve a distance of 378.83 feet to a point in the Southwesterly line of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway right -of -way, thence South 430 25' 18" WNW aaa West .%nq said Southwesterly line a di Knee of 38..77 feet to a point, thence South Oo 02' 26" West a distance of 741.24 feet to the true point of beginning. WEEMS, the Planning Commission, as a result of the above �— application did, pursuant to law, hold an advertised public hearing on such matter in the council Chamber of the City Hall of said City on April 12, 1973 and continued said hearing to April 26, 1973; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on April 26, 1973, hold a public hearing on said matter and an opportunity was given to all persons to present testimony or documentary evidence for or against the proposed amendment to Precise Plan No. 12; and- WHEREAS, as a result of said hearing, the following facts were established: and 1. Increase in leasable area (approximately 32,500 square feet. 2. Ability to more adequately separate the parking from office areas. 3. A better separation of the vehicular noises from the leasable area; WHEREAS, in view of the above facts, the Planning commission finds as follows: 1. The changes are not of substantial redesigning. 2. That it permitted a more efficient usage of the building for the project. 3. The parking facilities still meet the code re- quirements for the proposed uses. NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council of the City of E1 Segundo, California, the adoption of the proposed amendment to Precise Plan No. 12 for Continental Development Corporation to change the design of the parking facilities and office spaces of said Plan for t *e property hereinabove described, with the following conditions: 06i 1. That a toll gate or any other such device shall not be pawed at or near the vehicular entrances to Building No. 4 in any way that could restrict the free passage of vehicles through that structure. 2. That Building No. 4 shall be provided with two loading spaces or one space with a minimum of 800 square feet, and be so located so as not to interfere with internal vehicular circulation. 3. That the loading space shall be indicated on thg floor plan for level one, prior to issuance of the permit. 4. That the development be required to provide a minimum of 723 off - street parking spaces and that if the use of any building is changed to a use requiring more off - street parking spaces, such additional required spaces shall be provided. S. Trash and rubbish storage areas for Building No. 4 shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of the Director of Public Works. 6. The applicant shall, in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 2472, pay all costs incurred by the City for the preparation of the NEGATIVE DECLARATION on this project. FINALLY RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution shall be forwarded to the City Council for its action as prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26th day of April, 1973. Peter D. Charland. Chairman of the Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, California &0..X-a L Edward R. Loverde, Director of Planning of the City of E1 Segundo, California / APPENDIX E RESOLUTION NO. 2601 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC (PRECISE) PLAN NO. 12 AS AMENDED BY PRECISE PLAN NO. 3 -73. (CONTINENTAL DE- VELOPMENT CORPORATION) WHEREAS, on March 27. 1972, the City Council of the City of El Segundo adopted Resolution No. 2432, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS SPECIFIC (PRECISE) PLAN NO. 12. ", and, by said resolution, adopted Specific (Precise) Plan No. 12; and WHEREAS, on May 29, 1973, the City Council of the City of El Segundo adopted Resolution No. 2483, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC (PRECISE) PLAN NO. 12. ", and, by said Resolution, adopted an Amendment to Specific (Precise) Plan No. 12; and WHEREAS, at the request of the applicant and upon the written recommendation of the Director of Planning the Planning Commission con- sidered an amendment to Continental Development Corporation's Specific (Precise) Plan No. 12, as amended, and set such amendment for public bear- ing and after a bearing duly and regularly held approved and recommended for adoption by the City Council an amendment to Specific (Precise) Plan No. 12, as amended; and WHEREAS, said Plan is for property described as: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the center line of Rosecrans Avenue (100 feet wide), said Line also being the southerly line of Sec- tion 18, Township 3 South, Range 14 West, SBB & M. and the center line of Nash Street (80 feet wide); thence North 89° 57' 34" West, a distance of 338.00 feet; thence North 0. 02' 26" East a distance of 50 feet to a point in the northerly Line of Rosecrans Avenue, said point being the true point of beginning; thence South 89. 57' 34" East a distance of 268.00 feet to a point of tangency with a curve concave Northwest, having a central angle of 90• and a radius of 30.00 feet; thence along an are of said curve a distance of 47. 12 feet to a point of tangency with a Line parallel to and 40. 00 feet westerly of the said center line of Nash Street; thence North 0° 02' 26" East along the west- erly line of Nash Street a distance of 614.07 feet to a point of tangency 069 • 1p with a curve concave westerly having a central angle of 100 13' 42" and a radius of 2,122.09 feet; thence along an are of said curve a dis- tance of 378.83 feet to a point in the southwesterly line of The Atchison. Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company's right -of -way; thence South 430 25' 18" West along said southwesterly line a distance of 384.77 feet to a point; thence South 0. 02' 26" West a distance of 741.24 feet to the true point of beginning; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of El Segundo has duly and regularly held a public hearing on said amendment to said Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of El Segundo has acquired jurisdiction to adopt this resolution; NOW, THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C17Y OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETER- MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Specific (Precise) Plan No. 12, as amended by Precise Plan No. 3 -73, is hereby amended in the following particularst 1. The plans shall be modified to show that the driveway configura- tion will provide positive one -way travel. 2. A standard "Stop" sign and "Bait Only" sign shall be installed at locations to be approved by the Director of Public Works; 3. A sidewalk shall be installed along Rosecrans Avenue between Nash Street and the westerly property line subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works. 4. The curb cut on Rosecrans Avenue shall not be used for ingress of vehicles without the review and approval of the Planning Commission and the City Council. SECTION 2. The foregoing modifications will result in a reduction of seventeen parking spaces which reduction is hereby approved because the pro- ject will still provide thirty-one parking spaces in excess of that set forth in Reso- lution No. 2483. SECTION 3. Upon recommendation of the Planning Commission the City Engineer and the City Attorney be and they hereby are instructed to initiate proceedings to vacate that portion of Rosecrans Avenue previously dedi- cated to the City for street purposes. C -2- 070 I� I I I SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to endorse the Amendment to said Plan as hereby approved and adopted by the City Council. Said Plan is on file in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection and by this reference incorporated in this resolution and made a part hereof. SECTION 5. This resolution shall become effective upon adoption. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adop- tion of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said City, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7th day of January 1875. ATTEST: (SEAL) City er -3- e, Y6gj'-43 ayor of e 0 1 1 Z Segundo. CaUlorma. 071 APPENDIX F RESOLUTION NO. 832 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO PRECISE PLAN NO. 12 AS AMENDED BY PRE- CISE PLAN NO. 3 -73 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN SAID CITY (2041 EAST ROSECRANS AVENUE) WHEREAS, an application was made by Continental Development Corporation to amend Brecise Plan No. 12 as amended by Precise Plan No. 3 -73, by eliminating the deceleration lane as set forth in Condition No. 7 of City Council's Resolution No. 2432 and revising the parking configuration on both the north and west slides of the structure located at 2041 East Rosecrans Avenue, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the centerline of Rosecrans Avenue (100 feet wide), Said line also being the southerly line of Section 18, Township 3 South, Range 14 West, SBB 6 M. and the centerline of Nash Street (GO feet wide); thence north 890 57' 34" west, a distance of 338.00 feet; thence north 00 02' 26" east a distance of 50 feet to a point in the northerly Line of Rosecrans Avenue, said point being the true point of beginning; thence south 890 57' 34" east a distance of 268.00 feet to a point of tangency with a curve concave northwest, having a central angle of 900 and a radius of 30.00 feet; thence along an arc of said curve a distance of 47.12 feet to r point of tangency with a line parallel to and 40.00 feet westerly of the said centerline of Nash Street; thence north 00 02' 26" cast along the westerly line of Nash Street a distance of 614.07 feet to a point of tangency with a curve concave westerly huvinq a central angle of 100 13' 42" and a radius of 2,122.09 feet; thence along an are of said curve a distance of 378.83 feet to a point in the southwestsrly line of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway right -of -way; thence south 430 25' 18" west along said southwesterly line a distance of 384.77 feet to a point; thence south 00 02' 26" west a distance of 741.24 feet to the true point of beginning: and WHEREAS, the Planning Commissicr did, pursuant to law, hold a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, in the City of E1 Segundo, on December 12, 1974; and WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons to present testimony or documentary evidence for or against the proposed amend- ment; WHEREAS, at said hearing, the following facts were established: 1. The southwest satelite portion of Building No. 3 is being leased by the Bank of America. 2. The plan for the improvements for the Bank include a drive- through teller lane on the west side of the building. 072 3. Thi- design permits only exiting of e-,.icles at the Rosecrans Avenue curb cut. 4. The deceleration lane was required when previous plans permitted both ingress and egress off Rosecrans Avenue. 5. The revision of the parking configuration on the north and the west sides of the facility will facilitate an orderly flow of traffic into the two bank depositories. 6. The modification of parking will result in an overall reduction of seventeen parking spaces, however, the project will still be providing thirty -one parking spaces in excess of that set forth in Resolution No. 2483. WHEREAS, after considering the above facts and study of the proposed amendment, the Planning Commission finds: 1. The need for the deceleration lane will be eliminated. 2. Ample parking will be provided. 3. These modifications will be beneficial to the development and the general area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council, the adoption of the amendment to Precise Plan No. 12 as amended by Precise Plan No. 3 -73, submitted by continental Development Corporation, with the following conditions: 1. Driveway configuration shall be modified to provide positive one -way travel as shown on the plan. Construction shall be similar to street intersection design including curbs rather than standard driveway apron. 2. Developer shall install standard "stop" sign and "exit only" sign at locations to be approved by the Director of Public Works. 3. Developer shall install sidewalk along Rose - crans Avenue between Nash Street and westerly property line to be approved by the Director of Public Works. 4. The subject curb cut on Rosecrans Avenue cannot be used for the ingressing of vehicles without the review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Planning Com- mission recommends to the City Council that that portion of Rosecrans Avenue previously dedicated to the City for the purpose of a decel- eration lane, be vacated. FINALLY RESOLVED, that a copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded to the City Council for its action as prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 12th day of December, 1974. o}• Carr, r„ iae gnairran or r��.ard r.. Lo�eroe, Secretary o the Plannina Cormission of the the Planning Con.-ission of the City of El Secunvo, California Cit e5 71 Vie_ . ^.d o, California 7 J STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, EDWARD R. LOVERDE, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, do hereby certify that the fore- going is a full, true, and correct copy of a resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo, California, and that said resolution which was approved at the Planning Commission meeting of December 12, 1974 was so passed by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Christensen, Young and Vice Chairman Carr NOES: Commissioner McLees ASSENT: Chairman Charland ABSTAIN: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hav hereunto set my a this of y1 \' Edward R. Loverde, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, California C, 7 4 DW = t2 tIL acz s3az_c S 1st --!car - - - 2 J==icz = : • --72 a: 127 1st --!car - - - 2 'si 7 3z_'d fr_- l2 I zoo Is+ Lamm 5 IO 3oofs+= sl SJtal R2411red J'JLiv. Jai offica 53 =J7 13 Z4-7 43 Ln :-',-c e 23 2.7 7, . 9 3= .,99=; 25,74_ 26 746 11,-7"5 1 =-,9_2 ::Li41Ca StTtIC. 1:2,352 Flegv�ndl� ^obrluniq- �i(�li -8brk -� 6C _1 i l:_1C2 J�, a2J a.. 1^7,0:3 7 \i 2:3 075 'si 7 3z_'d fr_- -. 3 -' 41 Flegv�ndl� ^obrluniq- �i(�li -8brk -� 6C _1 i l:_1C2 J�, a2J a.. 1^7,0:3 7 \i 2:3 075 - — APPENDTr- RESOLUTION NO, 3917 A RFSOLUlION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CTIY OF EL SEGUNDO, CAI]FORNIA, CERTIFYING A14MGAIM NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA 3S0 AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO PRECISE PLAN 12.72, TO ALIDW A 3,550 SEAT MOVIE THEATER CONVERSION OF AN OFFICE BUILDING TO RETAIL/OFFICE, AND JOINT USE PARE NG AT2041 E. ROSECRANS AVENUE AND 831, 870 & 871 S. NASH STREET: PEITIIONED BY CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. WHEREAS, an application has been received from Continental Development Corporation, requesting approval of an Environmental Assessment and an Amendment to a Precise Plan to allow the development of a 18 screen, 3,550 seat movie theater complex and the conversion of an office building to retalL /office use on 6.03 acres located at 2041 E Rosecrans and 831, 870 & 871 S. Nash Street In the Urban Mixed -Use (MU) Zone; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment (EA -3S0), including a Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for the proposed use, has been prepared and circulated to all interested parties, staff, and affected public agencies for review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and supporting evidence with the authority and criteria contained In the California Environmental Quality Act, State CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No. 3805); and WHEREAS, a Traffic Impact Study was conducted to evaluate all transportation, circulation, and parking impacts associated with the project and submitted with the application; and WHEREAS, an Air Quality Assessment was conducted to estimate the air pollution emissions which will be generated by the project to evaluate any potential air quality impacts associated with the construction and operation of the facility and submitted with the application; and WHEREAS, a Fiscal Impact Analysis to evaluate the project costs versus project revenues and the project's impact on City services was conducted and submitted by the applicant; and WHEREAS, an Asbestos Report was submitted which examined potential asbestos impacts in the 831 S. Nash Street building which will be demolished; and WHEREAS, on April 6, 1995, the Planting Commission did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public hearing an such matter In the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law, and W DMEAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against the findings of Environmental Assessment EA -3S0 and Amendment to Precise Plan 12.72; and WHEREAS, on May 2, 1995 the City Council did hold, pursuant to law, duly - advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the Dry Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law, and WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons to present testimony or documentary evidence for or against Environmental Assessment EA -350 and Amendment to Precise Plan 12 -72; and WHEREAS, at said hearing the following facts were established- 1. The applicant is proposing to construct a new 65,000 square foot movie theater with 18 screens and 3,550 seats on a lot which currently has a 72,500 square foot office building at 871 S. Nash Street. A 340 space puking structure on this lot shall remain ^7F, 2. The three- story2041ERosecrans Avenue office building containing approximately 83.000 square feet of office space will be renovated and converted into a 80,000 net square foot retail and office building. Approximately 29,000 square feet on the ground floor is designated as retail and 51,000 square feet on the second and third floor will be retail and /or office. An exterior surface parking lot adjacent to the building will be retained. The proposed theaters and retail/ office building are located on a 3.S acre lot. 3. The 831 S. Nash Street property is located on 2.7 acres which includes a 7,401 square foot access easement for the adjacent theater parcel. The site is Improved with a vacant two - story office building containing approximately 105,000 square feet with two levels of Parking above. The building is proposed to be demolished and a new 190 space surface parking lot will be built in its place. 4. The two parcels of land will be reconfigured through a Lot Line Adjustment, which will also eliminate the access easement between the 831 S. Nash Street and 871 Nash S. Street buildings. The resulting FAR for the proposed project on the new lot is 0.56. S. The nine -level parking structure containing approximately 1,688 parking spaces, located at 870 S. Nash Street, will be connected to the plaza area between the retail/office and theater buildings by an approximately 2S foot wide crosswalk with a pedestrian activated signal across Nash Street at a position north of the northern most exit driveway of the parking structure at 870 S. Nash Stmt and the driveway immediately north of the parking structure. This parking structure serves an office building during the day and will provide joint parking for the theater and reta0/offlce during evening, weekend, and holiday hours. 6. The area surrounding the project site is highly urbanized. Land uses are comprised of medium -scale (e g. three to seven -story) office, commercial and industrial uses. A five -story office building, nine -level parking structure and a three -story office building are located within Continental Park immediately to the east of the site along Nash Stmt. An industrial air processing plant, Air Products Inc, Is located to the west of the site. immediately to the north Is an Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe railroad right -of -way with tracks leading to the Chevron Oil Refinery about 1/3 of a mile to the west. Beyond the railroad tracks is vacant land zoned for heavy industrial purposes The Manhattan Marketplace Retail Complex and a five -story office building housing a credit union are located to the south across Rosecrans Avenue. Beyond the credit union building Is the Radisson Hotel with golf and tennis facilities. To the south -west of the project across Rosecrans Avenue lies the Manhattan Village Shopping Center. Within Manhattan Village Is a 6 screen Mann Theaters with 1200 seats. There are no residential uses located in the Immediate project vicinity. The nearest residential uses are approximately 1,000 feet south of the project, adjacent to the Radiation Hotel golf course. Topographically, the project vicinity Is generally level to roWng terrain and is currently developed except for north of the property. Landscaping within the project locale is associated with the developed commercial and office properties. The existing buildings, uses and development standards were approved under a Precise Plan (PP -12) in 1972. The precise plan was amended twice to account for changing uses of the property. Precise Plan 73 -3 Increased floor area and altered the design of the parking facilities. A required deceleration lane on Rosecrans Avenue was eliminated as part of Precise Plan 74 -10 to accommodate a new drive -thru teller for a now vacated bank in the 2041 E Rosecrans Avenue building. Approval of a Precise Plan requires findings that the Precise Plan Is consistent with the General Plan. 8. The proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with State guidelines and local requirements, a Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and circulated for Interdepartmental and affected agency review. No significant adverse impacts were Identified which could not be mitigated to an insignificant level, including Impacts to traffic /circulation, risk of upset, air quality and public services. 9. The Fiscal Impact Analysis, utWzing the City s Fiscal Impact Mode, indicates that the project will generate a fiscal surplus for the City of between $636,300 to S 1,067,200 during its first five years of operation depending on the mix of office and retail in the 2041 E Rosecrans Avenue building, after consideration of City service costs. - 2 NOW, UIERFFORE, THE CITY COUNCII.OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION D AFTER CONSIDERING THE ABOVE FACTS, TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE PRESENTED AT THE HEARING, AND STUDY OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA- 3SO AND AMENDMENT TO PRECISE PLAN 12 -72, THE CITY COUNCIL MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND AMENDMENT TO PRECISE PLAN 12 -72: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FINDINGS The City Council hereby makes the following findings related to the environmental effects: 1. The Draft Initial Study was made available to all local and affected agencies and for pubic review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law. The Initial Study concluded that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, the adoption of mitigation measures would reduce these effects and impacts to a less than significant level The potentially significant effects identified in the Initial Study were increased demand for public services, vehicular /pedestrian conflicts on Nash Street, a reduced Level of Service (LOS) at the intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and Aviation Boulevard, increased parking demand, exposure to asbestos during the demolition of the 831 S. Nash Stmt building, potential discovery of previously unknown cutlural resources, and construction related fugitive dust emissions. The Impacts on public services were reduced to a level of insignificance by the mitigation measures set forth in Conditions 1, 2, 3. 4, 7, and 8 of Section 3 of this Resolution. The Impacts on vehicular /pedestrian conflicts were reduced to a level of insignificance by the mitigation measures set forth in Conditions 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 of Section 3 of this Resolution. The impacts on the Level of Service at the intersection of Roseaans Avenue and Aviation Boulevard were reduced to a level of insignificance by a prior land dedication by the applicant which will enable the intersection to be widened and the Level of Service improved, Therefore, no further mitigation measures for this effect are required. The impacts of parking demand were reduced to a level of Insignificance by the mitigation measures set forth in Conditions S and 28 of Section 3 of this Resolution. The potential impacts from exposure to asbestos during demolition were reduced to a level of insignificance by mitigation measures set forth In Condition 25 of Section 3 of this Resolution. The Impacts of the potential discovery of previously unknown cutlural resources were reduced to a level of insignificance by the mitigation measures set forth in Condition 26 of Section 3 of this Resolution. The effect of construction related fugitive dust emissions were reduced to a level of Insignificance by the mitigation measures set forth In Condition 30 of Section 3 of this Resolution. The Initial Study recommended that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact be prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQAk and 2. That when considering the whole record, there Is no evidence that the project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends, because the project is In a built -out urban environment, and 3. That the City Council thereby authorizes and directs the Director of Planning and Building Safety to file with the appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and de minimus finding pursuant to AS 3158 and the California Code of Regulations. Within ten (10) days of the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts, the applicant shall submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of S2S.00 required by the County of Los Angeles for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of Determination. As approved In AS 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA will not be met and no vesting shall occur until this condition is met and the required notices and fees are filed with the County. The City Council hereby finds that the proposed project and Amendment to Precise Plan 12 -72 are consistent with the General Plan based on the following: 78 1. That the proposed project Is in accord with the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The proposed project is consistent with the intent of the Urban Mixed Use (MU) Zone which allows a broad mix of retall, office, theaters and other commercial uses which serve a broad cross- section of the City and surrounding area. The proposed project includes retail, offices, and theaters, which are allowed by right in the MU Zone. 2. That the proposed use is consistent with the following General Plan Economic Development objectives and policies: ED 1 -1.1, ED 1 -1.2, ED 1 -2, ED 1.2.1, ED 1 -2.2, and ED 1.23, which relate to prioritizing economic development, diversification of an economic base, expanding the retail and commercial base, targeting lndustries that balance economic development and quality of life goals, and balancing development with resource and infrastructure capacity. 3. That the proposed use is consistent with the following General Plan Land Use Goals, Policies and Objectives: LU 1 -S.S, LU 4, LU 4 -1.1, LU 4 -1.2, LU 4 -1.4, LU 4 -3.1, LU 4.3.6, LU 4-4, LU 4.4.3, LU 44.6, LU 44.7, LU 4.S, LU 7 -12 and LU 7 -23. These issues relate to beautifying the City entrances, providing a stable tax base, providing landscaping, insuring seismic safety, encouraging ground floor retail use in a mixed -use environment, providing synergistic relationships with mixed uses and ensuring a mix of uses in the Urban Mixed - Use area, encouraging alternative transportation modes, providing good accessibility to transportation routes, and requiring adequate public facilities and underground utWttes. 4. The proposed use is consistent with the following General Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives related to circulation C 1 -1.13, C 1 -1.17, C 1 -2.1, C 1 -32, C 2 -1.6, C 2 -2.2, C 2- 33, C 2 -S.1, C 3 -1, C 3 -1.1, C 3 -12, C 3 -1.S, C 3 -1.7, and C 4 -12. These policies identify the need for full examination of project traffic impacts and complete mitigation, signal synchronization, a hierarchy and street classification system correlated to capacity and function, incorporation of off - street loading facilities, facilities designed for easy pedestrian access, bicycle facilities, pedestrian linkage to the Green Line, implementation of TDM standards, evaluation of circulation system impacts, full mitigation of all project - related circulation impacts, integration of transportation with land uses and surrounding environments, requiting developers to pay for mitigation measures, adequate pedestrian and bicycle access, and evaluation of project impacts on CMP routes. S. The proposed use is consistent with the following General Plan Goals Policies and Objectives related to air quality. AQ 7 -1.1, AQ 10.13, and AQ 12 -12, which relate to requiring conformance with the SCAQMD PM10 standards, improved traffic flow through signal synchronization, and encouraging energy conservationfeatures in the design of new projects. SECIION2: THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY APPROVES AND ADOPTS THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO PRECISE PLAN 12 -72 SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN SECTION 3 OF THIS RESOLUTION. 1. Theaters are a permitted use under Precise Plan 12.72 2. The development standards for Precise Plan 12 -72 are those set forth in the plans for the proposed project, dated March 30, 1995, including any revisions to said plans pursuant to Condition 1 of Section 3 of this Resolution In particular, the minimum setback for the theater building on Nash Stmt Is 15 -17 feet and the design of the existing facilities and the placement of essential facilities such as parking, traffic circulation and loading are as set forth in said plans and pursuant to Condition 11 of Section 3 of this Resolution 3. The required parking for the Precise Plan includes the joint use of the parking structure located at 870 S. Nash Street as set forth in Condition 5 of Section 3 of this Resolution. SECTION 3: THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY APPROVES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA -3S0, AND ADOPTS AND CERTIFIES A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Prior to approval of the building plans, the applicant shall develop plans which indicate that the project is in substantial conformance with plans approved and on file with the Department of Planning and Building Safety. Any subsequent modification to the project r,79 as approved shall be referred to the Director of Planning and Building Safety for a determination regarding the need for Planning Commission review of the proposed modification. 2. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall pay a one -time library services mitigation fee of 50.03 per gross square foot of building floor area for each building. 3. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall pay a one -time Fire Services Mitigation Fee of 50.14 per gross square foot of building floor area for each building. 4. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall pay a one -time Police Services Mitigation Fee of 50.11 per gross square foot of building floor area for each building. S. The applicant shall submit to the Department of Planning and Building Safety a Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance and Location of Off -Site Puking which states how 1,414 parking spaces are required and that 844 spaces in the 870 S. Nash Street parking structure will be located off -sits. The Covenant shall also stipulate that the Joint use parking In 870 S. Nash Street shall be available to the theaters and retall/office building at 2041 E Rosecrans only on weekends, evenings, and holidays. The Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance and Location of Off -Site Parking shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 6. The Applicant shall submit a Lot Line Adjustment to the Department of Planning and Building Safety to reconfigure the two lots on the west side of Nash Street. The Lot Line Adjustment must be recorded prior to approval of the building plans for the theater building. 7. Prior to approval of the building plans, the applicant shall submit a Security Plan, including a complete exterior lighting plan, to the Police Department for review and approval The plan shall be in substantial conformance with the Security Plan agreed to by the Police Department and the applicant as detailed in a letter dated April S, 1995. The security measures shall be installed prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or implemented prior to operation, as appropriate. 8. Prior to approval of the building plans, the applicant shall submit a Fire/11fe Safety Plan to the Fire Inspection Division of the Department of Planning and Building Safety which includes, but is not limited to the followhtg: A. Fire lane access; B. A fire control room on the grade level with access from the street or fire lane; C. A Fbv/Llfe safety system with emergency power, D. A voice activation system; and E A five year state certification for the fin sprinkler system. AB Fire/Life Safety Plan requirements must be installed and operational prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 9. A Landscaping and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted by the applicant to the Director of Planning and Building Safety and Director of Recreation and Parks prior to approval of the building plans. All landscaped areas shall be provided with a permanent automatic watering or irrigation system and shall be permanently maintained In a neat and clean manner. The applicant, U feasible, shall Incorporate provisions for the use of reclaimed water In the Landscaping and Irrigation Plan. The Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety and Director of Recreation and Parks and installed per the approved plans by the applicant prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. li 10. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall submit a Master Sign Plan to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area and the aesthetic objectives of the General Plan, as well as to ensure that signs do not impede traffic or pedestrian safety. The Master Sign Plan shall include off -site directional signs for the purpose of directing traffic to the 870 S. Nash Street parking structure via Apollo Street and the parking lot at the north end of the project site via Nash Street and Park Place. The Master Sign Plan shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Planning and Building Safety and all signs shall be installed per the approved plan prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 11. The applicant shall submit a Circulation Plan, prior to approval of the building plans, to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works and the City of Manhattan Beach where required, which contains, but is not limited to, the following provisions and is in substantial compliance with the Traffic Circulation Plan, dated April 18, 1995, on file in the Planning Division A. The applicant shall widen the north side of Rosecrans Avenue, west of Nash Street to provide dual left -turn lanes on eastbound Rosecrans Avenue; B. The existing right -turn only exit driveway on the west side of 2041 E Rosecrans Avenue building shall be converted to two -way operation; C. Westbound Rosecrans Avenue shall be widened in front of the 2041 E Rosecrans Avenue building to provide a separate right -turn lane to the driveway west of the 2041 E Rosecrans Avenue building; D. A 'shadowed' left -turn lane on eastbound Rosecrans Avenue shall be provided to access the converted two -way driveway west of 2041 E Rosecrans Avenue; E Westbound Rosecrans Avenue east of Nash Street shall be widened to provide a separate right -turn lane to Nash Steer F. The east side of Nash Street just north of the Intersection of Rosecrans Avenue shall be widened to accommodate traffic from the dual left -turn lanes on Rosecrans Avenue; G. Any future valet parking drop-off lane on the east side of Nash Street adjacent to 2101 Rosecrans Avenue shall be separated from north bound traffic by a five foot wide Island The valet drop-off zone shall be configured so that the face of the curb for the new island angles back toward the face of the curb at the southern end of Nash Street at the Intersection. A different pavement treatment than used on Nash Street shall be used for the valet drop-off zone to differentiate the two traffic areas. A continuous sidewalk on the east side of the valet zone shall be provided. If any part of the valet drop-off Wand is located In the public right-of -way, the applicant shall enter. into an agreement with the City to bear all liabilities (hold the City harmless) resulting from the operation of the valet drop-off zone; H. Provide an approximately 25 foot wide pedestrian crosswalk on Nash Street located between the northern most exit driveway of the puking structure at 870 S. Nash Street and the driveway Immediately north of the parking structure. Install a pedestrian activated traffic signal at the new Nash Stmt crosswalk with interconnection to the existing traffic signal at Rosecrans Avenue and Nash Stmt. The two signals shall be synchronized so as to clear northbound traffic through the portion of Nash Street south of the proposed crosswalk. The applicant shall fund the maintenance of the signal and shall enter into an agreement with the City for this purpose_ J. The existing circular planter island at the Nash Stmt and Park Place Intersection shall be removed and the Intersection reconfigured to provide access to the new proposed driveway at the north end of Nash Street and to provide a smooth stop controlled transition between Nash Street and Park Place. K The driveway between the theater and the retall/office building shall be no less than 34 feet in width. ^l8l L The driveway between the 2041 Rosecrans building and proposed theaters shall be designated for eastbound traffic as right turn only at Nash Street during peak hours, as determined by the City. All required Circulation Plan dements shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 12. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the City of Manhattan Beach for the construction of the traffic improvements located within the City of Manhattan Beach. All roadway improvements in the City of Manhattan Beach shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 13. The applicant will be required to prepare and submit a formal status report to the City's Traffic Committee which details all operational characteristics of the project and surrounding Continental Park development, related to traffic generation, distribution, and circulation, which impacts the project. A status report shall be submitted by the applicant 6 months and 1 year after opening the theaters. The traffic and pedestrian levels and their impacts on the operation of the City streets may be reviewed by the City on a continuing basis after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the movie theaters. �[ 19. Signs and other directional provisions will be added to the interior of the 870 S. Nash 7` Street parking structure by the applicant to direct pedestrians to the pedestrian crosswalk located outside the northwest comer of the parking structure. A plan for the signs and other directional provisions shall be submitted by the applicant and reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety prior to installatiow 15. Stairs, and other access as required by law, shall be provided by the applicant, at the northwest comer of the parking structure to facilitate pedestrian access from the parking structure to the pedestrian crosswalk between the ground level and the first above -grade level. A plan for the stairs and other access required by law shall be submitted by the applicant and reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety prior to installation. The required provisions shall be installed per the approved plans prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 16. The applicant shall pay the City Attorney's costs for preparing or reviewing any bond agreements or other such agreements between the applicant and the City required for the construction, maintenance, and operation, of the crosswalk, the pedestrian activated signal or other traffic and pedestrian improvements and off -site parking and valet dropoff agreement. 17. During construction. the entire project site shall be enclosed by a six -foot high chain link fence. Gates for site fencing shall not open over sidewalk/public right -of -way. A fencing plan shall be submitted by the applicant and reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building saferyprior to building plan approval and installation of the fencing. 18. All work within the City public right -of -way shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and City of El Segundo Standard Specifications. No work shall be performed In the public right -of -way without first obtaining a Public Works permit. 19. Prior to approval of the building plans, plans shall indicate that all existing and proposed utilities shall be placed underground to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The applicant shall assume the costs for the relocation of all utilities, Including but not limited to, light poles, electrical vaults, and fire hydrants which are affected by the proposed project. 20. Encroachment permits must be obtained from the Engineering Division Public Works Department for demolition haul -off. Permit must be obtained at the same time the permit for demolition Is issued. An encroachment permit for grading is also requited when import or export of dirt exceeds fifty (SO) cubic yards. Demolition and grading may be listed on one encroachment permit. n82 21. Prior to approval of the building plans, plans shall show the location of all proposed trash enclosures to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building Safety. Plans shall also indicate that the trash area will Incorporate adequate space for the collection of recyclable matenals. 22. If new sewer laterals are required and constructed In the public right -of -way they shall be a minimum of six (6) inches inside diameter. Material shall be 'vitreous day pipe'. Each lateral shall have a six (6) inch clean -out brought to grade at the property Me and securely capped. A B9 size box shall be placed around the C.O. for protection. The box shall have a cover emblazoned with the word 'sewer'. If in a traffic area, cover shall be traffic approved. All planned sewer connections shall be checked for elevation pnor to starting construction. Existing sewer laterals shall be plugged at the sewer mamline and capped at the property hne. Existing six (6) inch wyes may be reused if approved by the Director of Public Works. 23. No material storage is allowed in the public right -of -way except by permit issued by the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. If material storage is allowed in the public right-of -way It shall be confined to parkway areas and street parking areas, as long as safe and adequate pedestrian and vehicular passage is maintained at all times. Storage beyond these areas in the public right -of -way requires prior approval of the Public Works Department and shall be limited to a maximum period of 24 hours. 24. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, new curbs, sidewalk, driveway approaches, wheelchair ramps and A.0 pavement, including alleys, shall be constructed/reconstructed as required by the Director of Public Works. Existing driveways and other concrete work not to be incorporated into the construction shall be removed and replaced with standard curb and sidewalk. 25. Demolition of drywall containing Asbestos Containing Construction Material (ACCT) or Asbestos Containing Building Material (ICBM) In the 831 S. Nash Street building or the other structures being demolished shall be performed under asbestos dust control measures (Le. misting the air with amended water, utilizing negative air machines, respiratory and clothing protection, and showers) in accordance with applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) rules. The applicant shall provide the Department of Planning and Building Safety copies of any permits required by SCAOMD prior to commencement of demolition or grading. 26. Should any previously un- recorded archeological or cultural resources be encountered during construction of the project, all work will be stopped and the Department of Planning and Building Safety will be notified immediately. At the owner's expense ■ qualified archeologist will be consulted to determine the potential significance of the find. and his findings shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Building Safety pnor to the commencement of work. 27. The proposed movie theaters shall have a maximum of 3,550 seats 28. The parking structures and surface parking lots on the west side of Nash Street shall remain open and available to all theater patrons as well as the retall/office customers and employees at all times of the day and night. 29. The applicant shall submit the appropriate documentation to show conformance with or exemption from the state Water Quality Control Hoard's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for construction related atormwater runoff to the Director of Public Works prior to the approval of the building plans 30. During construction dust control measures shall be required in accordance with the City's Dust Control Ordinance. Grading will be discontinued during first -stage smog alerts and suspended during periods of high wind (Le. over 1S miles per hour). All hauling trucks shall have loads covered or wetted and loaded below the sideboards to minim' a dust. n 8 '1 SECTION 4 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall entered the same in the book of original resolutions of said city; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting which the same is passed and adopted. a a� 7 y Mort pity Clerk (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORD i_ Leland C. honey, City Attorney PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this IaL day of T iggs. 1)acobsop, Mayor of the City of El Segundo, California 084 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ] COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ] I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the whole number of members of the City Council of the said City is five; that the foregoing resolution, being RESOLUTION NO. 3917 was duly passed and adopted by the said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor or said City, and attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeang of the said Council held on the 2nd day of May 1995, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: Mayor Jacobson, Mayor ProTem Weston, Councilman Switz, Councilman Robbins, and Councilwoman Friedkin. NOES. None ABSENT: None ABSTENTION: None WITNESS MY HAND THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF SAID CITY this 4th day of May, 1995. City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, Caftmia (SEAL) 9m— 085 APPEHDIA H RESOLUTION NO. 4034 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - 401 (EA401) REAFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT -350 (EA -350) AND ADOPTING PRECISE PLAN 96- 1(PP 96 -1) AS THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO PRECISE PLAN 12 -72 (PP 12 -72), TO ALLOW MODIFICATIONS TO THE PARKING STRUCTURE STAIRWAY AND DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE, TRAFFIC CIRCULATION PLAN REVISIONS AND OUTDOOR DINING AT 2041 ROSECRANS AND 831, 870, AND 871 SOUTH NASH STREET. PETITIONED BY CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. WHEREAS, an application has been received from Continental Development Corporation, requesting approval of an amendment to Precise Plan 12 -72, as subsequently modified, to allow modifications to the parking structure stairway and directional signage, traffic circulation plan revisions, outdoor dining for a restaurant, and other amendments as stated in the application; and, WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment (EA -401), including further analysts of the findings of the Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the EA -350, has been prepared and circulated to all interested parties, City Staff, and affected public agencies for review and comment to the time and manner prescribed by law; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and supporting evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act, State CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No. 3805); and, WHEREAS, a Traffic Impact Study was conducted to evaluate all transportation, circulation, and parking impacts associated with the project and submitted with the application by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Inc. and reviewed for the City by Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.; and, WHEREAS, an Air Quality Assessment was conducted by Planning Consultants Research to evaluate the air pollution impacts associated with the construction and operation of the facility and submitted with the application and reviewed by the City Staff; and, WHEREAS, a Fiscal Impact Analysts was prepared by Planning Consultants Research to evaluate any potential changes in the project costs versus project revenues and the project's impact on City services and submitted with the application and reviewed by City Staff, and, WHEREAS, on September 11, 1997, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter to the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law; the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2400, recommending approval of the Precise Plan Amendment and Environmental Assessment, and, 09 WHEREAS, on September 16, 1997, the City Council did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law; and, WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against the findings of Environmental Assessment EA-401 and Precise Plan 96 -1; and, WHEREAS, at said hearing the following facts were established- 1 The Applicant requests approval of Items 1, 2, 3, and 4, as detailed in the September 11, 1997 Staff Report 2 The Applicant has requested a continuance of Items No. 5, 6, and 7, as detailed in the September 9, 1997 Staff Report, for approximately 30 days. 3 The Applicant has requested continuation of the three (3) items to allow the Planning Commission and City Council tune to complete deliberations on all other requested components and to provide the Applicant and City Stall' additional time to consider the continued items. 4 Condition No. 15 of City Council Resolution No. 3917 for PP 94 -1 requires the stairs at the northwest comer of the parking structure at 870 South Nash Street to extend from the 'ground level' to the 'first above -grade level', of the parking structure, rather than from the 'ground level' to the basement level' of the parking structure, as currently constructed. 5. The applicant has requested a determination that the stairway as constructed, be deemed in "substantial compliance' with Condition No. 15 of City Council Resolution No. 3917. 6 Condition No. 14 of City Council Resolution No. 3917 requires the provision of signage in accordance with Condition 15 of City Council Resolution No. 3917. 7 The applicant is requesting approval of revisions to the signage and other directional provisions added to the interior of the 870 South Nash Street parking structure to accommodate the revisions in Item No. 4 above. 8 The circulation changes include revisions to the approved Traffic Circulation Plan, as shown on the Supplemental Traffic and Parking Impact Study as follows: a The closing of the existing Common Area Plaza (Plaza) 34 foot wide driveway between the theater and the retail /office building (Condition 11 -k of Resolution No. 3917) off of South Nash Street to vehicular traffic; b Converting the easterly two- thirds of the Plaza to pedestrian activity only; C. Converting the westerly third of the plaza to valet drop -oil /pick -up area, d Elimination of the need to restrict eastbound traffic, from the closed driveway to a right - turn only movement at South Nash Street during peak hours (Condition No. 11 -L of Resolution No. 3917), 1: Providing a new sidewalk and curbside theater drop- off/pick -up zone on the west side of South Nash Street; f. The re- stripping of South Nash Street to add a drop -off lane and maintain two driving lanes on the east side of South Nash Street; and The relocation of eight (8) handicapped parking spaces from the Plaza area to the 871 South Nash Street Parking structure The applicant plans to establish a new quality restaurant 'blending culinary creations from the major regions of China with American hospitality to create a unique dining experience.' 10 The new restaurant will include an outdoor dining area of 1,200 square feet; a 5,400 square foot indoor seating area (including bar area); and kitchen and back -of -the - house' space of 1,800 square feet. 11 If P. F. Chang's China Bistro does not utilize all of the 1,200 square feet of outdoor dining area then other future restaurant(s) may utilize the area. 12 The applicant requested that the following Items be continued for 30 days. Amendment of the Precise Plan land uses to conform with the current code for the underlying zone: the 'Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone.' The applicant requested to amend the Precise Plan to allow all the land uses in the Precise Plan that are presently allowed in the MU -S Zone This includes: a. Permitted Uses; b. Permitted Accessory Uses; c. Uses Subject to an Administrative Use Permit; d. Uses Subject to a Conditional Use Permit; and e. Adult Business Permits. Additionally, the applicant requested that uses in the Plaza and Entry Court, including outdoor dining, retail sales, and other ancillary uses which are supportive of the site's primary retail uses, are included as permitted uses. Amendment of the Precise Plan development standards to conform with the current code for the underlvintt zone: the 'Urban Mixed- Use South (MU -S) Zone.' The applicant requested to amend the Precise Plan to incorporate the development standards of the MU- S Zone into the Precise Plan, except w may have been previously established and constructed under the Precise Plan. Amendment of the Precise Plan to orovide for minor modifications to the requirements of the Precise Plan by the Director of Planning and Building Safety. The applicant requested that the City establish a procedure to provide for minor modifications to the requirements of the Precise Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Director of Planning and Building Safety. The procedure would allow flexibility for the applicant to meet market changes without the necessity of a full Precise Plan amendment They have indicated a desire to provide for minor modifications to enhance the development without creating adverse impacts for surrounding developments 13 The area surrounding the project site is highly urbanized. 14 The project site is located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo approximately one (1) mile to the west of the San Diego Freeway [Interstate -405 (1405)]. The project area is 088 approximately 6.03 acres (262,737 square feet) The project is bounded by Rosecrans Avenue on the south, Nash Street on the east, an industrial facility (Air Products) on the west, and railroad tracks on the north. Local jurisdictions bordering or near the site include the City of Manhattan Beach located immediately south of Roseerans Avenue and the City of Hawthorne locate to the cast of Aviation Boulevard. 15 The site is in the southwestern portion of Continental Park, which is a large office and industrial park containing approximately 2 million square feet of office, research and development, hotel, health club, restaurant, retail, and movie theater uses. 16 The project site is currently developed and has been historically used for commercial uses since 1972. The City's General Plan designates the site for mixed use development The project is located within a highly urbanized environment. The topography of the site is quite level and contains no unique geologic features. Landscaping is limited to the areas adjacent to South Nash Street on the east, the rear yard setback on the north, and along Rosecrans Avenue to the south. 17 The area surrounding the project site is highly urbanized. Land uses are comprised of office, commercial, restaurant, theater, research and development, and other similar uses The Manhattan Marketplace Retail Center and a five -story office building housing a credit union are located to the south across Rosecrans Avenue. Beyond the credit union building is the Radisson Hotel with golf and tennis facilities. To the southwest of the project across Rosecrans Avenue Ices the Manhattan Village Shopping Center. 18. There are no residential uses located in the immediate project vicinity. The nearest residential uses ace approximately 1,000 feet south of the project, adjacent to the Radisson Hotel golf course. The project site is only visible from Rosecrans Avenue on the south and from South Nash Street on the east. Topographically, the project vicinity is generally level to rolling terrain and is currently developed except for north of the property. 19 The existing buildings, uses and development standards were approved under a Precise Plan (PP- 12) in 1972 The Precise Plan was previously amended by PP 73 -3, PP 74 -10, and PP 94 -1. 20 The proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with State guidelines and local requirements, a Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for EA -350 was prepared and circulated for interdepartmental and affected agency review. No significant adverse impacts were identified which could not be mitigated to an insignificant level, including impacts to traffic/circulation, risk of upset, air quality and public services. The applicant is requesting a determination that the requested actions of the City are within the scope of the development limits established by the approval of EA -350 (which was approved with a Mitigated Negative Declaration related to environmental effects). 21 The applicant submit three (3) studies and an environmental questionnaire related to the environmental effects of the proposed project. The throe studies evaluated fiscal, traffic and air quality effects of the proposed project related to the previous approvals. City Staff and consultants have reviewed the studies and found them to be prepared in accordance with CEQA and City Standards. The studies provide the necessary facts for required CEQA findings. 22 The Fiscal Impact Analysis indicates the proposed project will generate a fiscal surplus for the City, after consideration of City service costs. 4 li SECTION 1. AFTER CONSIDERING THE ABOVE FACTS, THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND STUDY OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA401 AND PRECISE PLAN 96 -1 (PP 96 -1), THE CITY COUNCIL MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND REAFFIRMS THE FINDINGS OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .350 (EA- 350): ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1. The Initial Study concluded that the previous project (EA -350) will not have a significant, adverse effect on the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the subject project is within the environmental thresholds established and approved through EA -350; and, That when considering the whole record, there is no evidence that the proposed modifications to the project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends, because the project is in a built -out urban environment, and, That the City Council authorizes and directs the Director of Planning and Building Safety to file with any appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and de minimus finding pursuant to AB 3158 and the California Code of Regulations. Within ten (10) days of the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts, the applicant shall submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of 525.00 required by the County of Los Angeles for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of Determination. As approved in AB 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA will not be met and no vesting shall occur until this condition is met and the required notices and fees are filed with the County. PRECISE PLAN That the proposed location of the project is in accord with the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The proposed project is consistent with the intent of the Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone which allows a broad mix of uses. Precise Plan 12 -72, which established the design of the existing facilities and the placement of essential related facilities such as parking, traffic circulation, and loading, is significantly altered by the proposed amendment. However, studies prepared by the applicant and review by the City indicate that no significant increase in environmental effects will occur. The amendments are consistent with the purposes of a Precise Plan which, like a Specific Plan or a Planned Residential Development, provides the flexibility to allow for deviation from specific site development standards to achieve the overall design for the site. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY That the proposed use is consistent with the following General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Designation for the site, as well as the zoning, is Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S). In accordance with the General Plan, "The Urban Mixed -Use 1116,1111 South designation allows a mixture of uses including once, hotels and retail Light industrial uses are allowed with discretionary approval. b. The Urban Mixed -Use South designation is designed to allow for a flexibility of uses near the two existing Green Line transtt stations. The MU -S designation allows an FAR of 1.3, the maximum density allowed in the area, since traffic and air quality impacts associated with higher densities can be more easily mitigated with mixed uses in close proximity to mass transit. The proposed project is in conformance with many General Plan goals, policies and objectives related to Economic Development, Land Use, Circulation and Air Quality. The following Economic Development objectives and policies apply; ED 1 -1.1, ED 1 -1.2, ED 1 -2, ED 1 -2.1, ED 1 -2.2, and ED 1 -23, which relate to prioritizing economic development, diversification of an economic base, expanding the retail and commercial base, targeting industries that balance economic development and quality of life goals, and balancing development with resource and infrastructure capacity. Many Land Use goals, policies and objectives apply, which the project is in conformance with, including; LU 4, LU 4 -1.1, LU 4 -1.4, LU 4 -3.1, LU 4 -3.6, LU 4-4, LU 4 -43, LU 4-4.6, LU 4-4.7, LU 4.5, LU 7 -1.2 and LU 7 -23. These issues relate to providing a stable tar base, providing landscaping, encouraging ground floor retail use in a mixed -use environment, providing synergistic relationships with mixed uses and ensuring a mix of uses in the Urban Mixed -Use area, encouraging alternative transportation modes, providing good accessibility to transportation routes, and requiring adequate public facilities and underground utilities. Circulation Element policies and objectives also apply, which the project is in conformance with, to the proposal ineludmg; C 1 -1.13, C 1 -2.1, C 1 -3.2, C 2 -1.6, C 2 -3.3, C 3 -1, C 3 -1.1, C 3 -1.2, C 3 -1.5, C 3 -1.7, and C 4 -1.2. These policies identify the need for full examination of project traffic impacts and complete mitigation, a hierarchy and street classification system correlated to capacity and function, incorporation of off - street loading facilities, facilities designed for easy pedestrian access, pedestrian linkage to the Green Line, evaluation of circulation system impacts, full mitigation of all project - related circulation impacts, integration of transportation with land uses and surrounding environments, requiring developers to pay for mitigation measures, adequate pedestrian and bicycle access and evaluation of project impacts on CMP routes. The proposed project is located on a secondary arterial street (Nash Street) which is already substandard in lane configuration compared to the standards established in the General Plan (2 through lanes in each direction with a striped median instead of three lanes in each direction with a raised median) Although the proposed revised circulation plan would eliminate the stripped median on Nash Street to accommodate pedestrian drop -off areas for the theaters, the Planning Commission finds that the revised circulation plan would be consistent with the General Plan- Master Plan of Streets because the revisions will improve pedestrian safety at the existing pedestrian activated signalized crosswalk by providing a larger queuing area on the west side of the crosswalk. The project will also improve circulation in the area through the elimination of the 34 foot wide driveway between the theater and the retail /office building. Additionally, the proposed circulation modifications would not preclude the possible future extension of 091 Nash St., as identified to the Master Plan of Streets, as there is no change in the actual nght -of -way width. The final policies and objectives which apply to the proposed project, which the project is in conformance with, are contained within the Air Quality Element including; AQ 7- 1.1 and AQ 12 -1.2, which relate to requiring conformance with the SCAQMD PM10 standards and encouraging energy conservation features in new building design. SECTION 2. THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY APPROVES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA- 401 (EA 401) REAFFIRMING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - 350 (EA- 350) AND ADOPTS ITEMS 1, 2, 3, AND 4 OF PRECISE PLAN 96 -1 (PP 96 -1), AND THE CONTINUATION OF ITEMS 5, 6, AND 7 AS DESCRIBED BELOW: An amendment to Condition No. 15 of City Council Resolution No. 3917 related to the parking structure stairway at 870 South Nash Stmt. An amendment to Condition No 14 of City Council Resolution No. 3917 related to the parking structure stairway directional signage at 870 South Nash Street. Revisions to the approved Traffic Circulation Plan, as shown on the Supplemental Traffic and Parking Impact Study. The approval of a Precise Plan Amendment to allow outdoor dining that exceeds 200 square feet for the P. F. Chang's China Bistro and other future restaurants. Items 5, 6, and 7 continued for 30 days. Amendment of the Precise Plan land uses to conform with the current code for the underlying zone, the 'Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone.' Amendment of the Precise Plan development standards to conform with the current code for the underlying zone; the 'Urban Mixed- Use South (MU -S) Zone.' Amendment of the Precise Plan to provide for minor modifications to the requirements of the Precise Plan by the Director of Planning and Building Safety. SECTION 3. THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY APPROVES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA- 401 AND ADOPTS AND CERTIFIES A PRECISE PLAN AMENDMENT 96 -1 AS AN AMENDMENT TO PRECISE PLAN 12 -72, PP 73 -3, AND PP 94 -1 STATED AS ITEMS 1, 2, 3, AND 4 AND THE CONTINUATION OF ITEMS 5, 6, AND 7 AS DESCRIBED ABOVE, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Pnor to approval of the building plans, the applicant shall develop plans which indicate that the project is in substantial conformance with plans approved and on file with the Department of Planning and Building Safety with the exception of layout of the interior of the restaurant. Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred to the Director of Planning and Building Safety for a determination regarding the need for Planning Commission review of the proposed modification. 092 Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building Safety that all fees for the development permitted by Environmental Assessment EA -350 and Precise Plan 94 -1 have been paid. Additionally, the applicant shall ,pay all fees indicated below as may be required by the City. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall pay a one -time Library services mitigation fee of S0.03 per square foot of building floor area for the outdoor dining area. b. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall pay a one -time Fire Services mitigation fee of $0.14 per square foot of building floor area for the outdoor dining area C. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall pay a one -time Police Services mitigation fee of 50.11 per square foot of building floor area for the outdoor dining area d. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall pay a one -time Traffic Impact mitigation fee pursuant to City Council Resolution No 3969, to the Department of Public Works, for the outdoor dining area. 3 The applicant shall submit to the Department of Planning and Building Safety any amendments to the Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance and Location of Off -Site Parking or demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building Safety that an amendment is not required Any amendment to the Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance and Location of Off-Site Parking shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 4 Prior to approval of the building plans, the applicant shall submit an amendment to the Security Plan, including a complete exterior lighting plan, to the Police Department for review and approval. The security measures shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or implemented prior to operation, as appropriate. 5 Prior to approval of the restaurant building plans, the applicant shall submit an amendment to their approved Fire/Life Safety Plan to the Fire, Department for review and approval. All Fire/Life Safety Plan requirements must be installed and operational prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 6. An amendment to the Landscaping and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted by the applicant to the Directors of Planning and Building Safety and Recreation and Parks and Police Chief prior to approval of the Circulation Plan. All landscaped areas shall be provided with a permanent automatic watering or irrigation system and shall be permanently maintained in a neat and clean manner. The applicant, if feasible, shall incorporate provisions for the use of reclaimed water in the Landscaping and Irrigation Plan. The Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Directors of Planning and Building Safety and Recreation and Parks and the Police Chief and installed per the approved plans by the applicant prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall submit any amendments necessary to the Master Sign Plan to ensure clear and convenient directional signage, compatibility with the surrounding areas, and the aesthetic objectives of the General Plan, as well as to ensure that the signs enhance and do not impede traffic or pedestrian safety. The amendment shall also address signage to reduce pedestnan 'jaywalking' on South Nash Street. The amendment to the Master Sign Plan shall be subject to the approval of the Directors of Planning and Building Safety and Public Works and the Police Chief and all signs shall be installed per the approved plan prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant shall submit a final Circulation Plan, to be reviewed and approved by the Directors of Public Works and Planning and Building Safety and the Police Chief for all circulation and parking related improvements, which contains, but is not limited to the following provisions. a The closing of the existing Common Area Plaza (Plaza) 34 foot wide driveway between the theater and the retail /office building (Condition 11 -k of Resolution No. 3917) off of South Nash Street to vehicular traffic; b. Converting the easterly two- thirds of the Plaza to pedestrian activity only, c Converting the westerly third of the plaza to valet drop- off/pick -up area; d Elimination of the need to restrict eastbound traffic, from the closed driveway to a right - turn only movement at South Nash Street during peak hours (Condition No. 11 -L of Resolution No. 3917); Providing a new sidewalk and curbside theater drop-off/pick-up zone on the west side of South Nash Street; The re- striping of South Nash Street to add a drop-off lane and maintain two driving lanes on the east side of South Nash Stmt; and g The relocation of eight (8) handicapped parking spaces from the Plaza area to the 871 South Nash Street Parking structure. All required Circulation Plan elements shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. All work within the City public right -of -way shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and City of El Segundo Standard Specifications. No work shall be performed in the public right -of -way without first obtaining a Public Works permit. 10 Encroachment permits must be obtained from the Engineering Division Public Works Department for demolition haul-off. Permit must be obtained at the same time the permit for demolition is issued An encroachment permit for grading is also required when import or export of dirt exceeds fifty (50) cubic yards. Demolition and grading may be listed on one encroachment permit. 11 No material storage is allowed in the public right -of -way except by permit issued by the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. If material storage is allowed in the public right -of -way it shall be confined to parkway areas and stmt parking areas, as long as safe and adequate pedestrian and vehicular passage is maintained at all times. Storage beyond these areas in the public right -of -way requires prior approval of the Public Works Department and shall be Imaued to a maximum period of 24 hours. 094 12 Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, new curbs, sidewalk, driveway approaches, wheelchair ramps and A.C. pavement, including alleys, shall be constructed /reconstructed as required by the Director of Public Works. Existing driveways and other concrete work not to be incorporated into the construction shall be removed and replaced with standard curb and sidewalk. 13 During construction dust control measures shall be required in accordance with the City's Dust Control Ordinance. Grading will be discontinued during first -stage smog alerts and suspended during periods of high wind (i.e. over 15 miles per hour) All hauling trucks shall have loads covered or wetted and loaded below the sideboards to minimize dust. 14 Prior to Certificate of Occupancy the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City in a manner approved by the City Attorney and Director of Planning and Building Safety to assure implementation of the recommendations of the Traffic Study Review prepared by Hartzog & CrabdI, Inc., dated August 27, 1997. 15 A circulation and traffic review will be required a minimum of six (6) months to a maximum of twelve (12) months after the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the outdoor restaurant use. The definition of a 'review" involves the preparation of a study for the actual project operations, identical to that performed for the development, of the site. The findings shall be submitted to the Departments of Planning and Building Safety, Public Works, Police and Fire for review and approval. If necessary, the operations may be modified to maintain clear circulation and access at all times or other mitigation that the City deems appropriate will be required. 16 The applicant shall pay the City's Traffic Consultant cost for the preparation, review or analysis of materials for Items 14 and 15 above. 17 During construction, the entire project site shalt be enclosed by a six -foot high chain link fence. Gates for site fencing shall be located at driveways and shall not open over sidewalk/publio right - of -way A fencing plan shall be submitted by the applicant and reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety prior to installation. I& Prior to approval of the building plans, plans shall indicate that all existing and proposed utilities shall be placed underground to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The applicant shall assume the costs for the relocation of all utilities, including but not limited to, light poles, electrical vaults, and fire hydrants which are affected by the proposed project. 19 If new sewer laterals are required and constructed in the public right -of -way they shall be a minimum of six (6) inches inside diameter. Material shall be "vitreous clay pipe ". Each lateral shall have a six (6) inch clean -out brought to grade at the property line and securely capped. A B9 size box shall be placed around the C.O for protection. The box shall have a cover emblazoned with the word "sewer ". If in a traffic area, cover shall be traffic approved. All planned sewer connections shall be checked for elevation prior to starting construction. Existing sewer laterals shall be plugged at the sewer mainline and capped at the property line. Existing six (6) inch wyes may be reused if approved by the Director of Public Works. 20 The applicant shall develop the property pursuant to applicable provisions of the City's Water Conservation Ordinance. 21 The applicant shall indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, actions, 10 095 causes of action, proceedings or suits which challenge or attack the validity of the City's approval of Environmental Assessment EA401 and Precise Plan Amendment 96 -1. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records if the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of meeting which the same is passed and adopted ATTEST PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of Sentember. 1997. Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk (SEAL) 0218 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D enslcy, City Attorney 11 Sandra Jacobs, Mayor of the City of El Segundo, California p:\prqjects\ea40l\ca40l-cc.res n C4 APPENDIX I RESOLUTION NO. 4064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - 401A (EA401A) REAFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT -350 (EA -350) AND ADOPTING PRECISE PLAN 96- 1A (PP 96-1A) AS THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO PRECISE PLAN 12 -72 (PP 12,72), TO ALLOW MODIFICATIONS TO THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION PLAN FOR PASSENGER DROP -OFF, PARKING MANAGEMENT, AND PERMITTING OUTDOOR AMENITIES IN THE PLAZA AREA AT 2041 ROSECRANS AND 831, 870, AND 871 SOUTH NASH STREET. PETITIONED BY CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. WHEREAS, an application has been received from Continental Development Corporation, requesting approval of an amendment to Precise Plan 12 -72, as subsequently modified, to allow modifications to the traffic circulation plan for passenger drop -off, managing parlang in the 871 South Nash street parking structure and surface parking lots, and permitting various outdoor amenities in the plaza area; and, WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment (EA -401 A), including further analysts of the findings of the Draft Initial Study and Mmgated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the EA -350, has been prepared and circulated to all interested parties, City Staff, and affected public agencies for review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and supporting evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act, State CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No 3805); and, WHEREAS, a Supplemental Traffic and Parking Study was conducted to evaluate all transportation, circulation, and parking impacts associated with the project and submitted with the application by Lmscott, Law & Greenspan, Inc, and reviewed for the City by Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.; and, WHEREAS, on May 28, 1998, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the rime, form and manner prescribed by law; the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2418, recommending approval of the Precise Plan Amendment and Environmental Assessment, and, WHEREAS, on September 16, 1997, the City Council did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public heating on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and nonce of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law, and, WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against the findings of Environmental Assessment EA -401A and Precise Plan Amendment 96-1A; and, WHEREAS, at said hearing the following facts were established: I The applicant requests approval of Items 8, 9, and 10 of the original application (EA -401, PP 96-1); oa% Items 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the original application (EA401, PP 96-1) were approved by the City Council on September 16, 1997 Items No. 5, 6, and 7 of the original application (EA -401, PP 96-1) have been postponed to provide the applicant and City staff additional time to review the items Condition No. 8 of City Council Resolution No 4034 for PP 96-1 requires the re- stnppmg of South Nash Street to add a drop -off lane and maintain two driving lanes on the east side of South Nash Street The applicant has requested modification of this condition to relocate the passenger drop -off area inside the parking structure at 871 South Nash Street. Condition No. 28 of City Council Resolution No. 3917 for PP 94-1 requires that all parking on the subject property be available to all theater patrons at all times of the day and night. The applicant is requesting a modification of this Condition to manage the parking in the 871 South Nash Street parking structure and surface parking lots in order to reserve parking for office tenants, restaurant and retail patrons for the 2041 Rosecrans Avenue building, in addition to valet parking for the 2041 Rosecrans Avenue building and theaters. Precise Plan 12 -72, as modified, does not list accessory outdoor uses such as outdoor retail in the plaza area between the Pacific Theatre building at 831 South Nash Street building and the 2041 Rosecrans Avenue building as permitted uses. The applicant requests permission to provide a limited number of permanent tables, chairs, retail uses and other amenines in the plaza area of the project to complement the retail and entertainment uses The area surrounding the project site is highly urbanized. The project site is located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo approximately one (1) mile to the west of the San Diego Freeway [ Interstate - 405 (1.405)). The project area is approximately 6.03 acres (262,737 square feet) The project is bounded by Rosecrans Avenue on the south, Nash Street on the east, an industrial facility (Air Products) on the west, and railroad tracks on the north. Local jurisdictions bordering or near the site include the City of Manhattan Beach located immediately south of Rosecrans Avenue and the City of Hawthorne located to the east of Aviation Boulevard. The site is in the southwestern portion of Continental Park, which is a large office and industrial park containing approximately 2 million square feet of office, research and development, hotel, health club, restaurant, retail, and movie theater uses to The project site is currently developed and has been historically used for commercial uses since 1972 The City's General Plan designates the site for mixed use development. The project is located within a highly urbanized environment. The topography of the site is quite level and contains no unique geologic features Landscaping is limited to the areas adjacent to South Nash Street on the east, the rear yard setback on the north, and along Rosecrans Avenue to the south. 11 Land uses are comprised of office, commercial, restaurant, theater, research and development. and other similar uses The Manhattan Marketplace Retail Center and a five -story office building housing a credit union are located to the south across Rosecrans Avenue. Beyond the credit union building is the Radrsson Hotel with golf and tennis facilities. To the southwest of the project across Rosecrans Avenue lies the Manhattan Village Shopping Center. 2 n9� 12 There are no residential uses located in the immediate project vtctntty The nearest residential uses are approximately 1,000 feet south of the project, adjacent to the Radisson Hotel golf course. The project site is only visible from Rosecrans Avenue on the south and from South Nash Street on the east. Topographically, the project vicinity is generally level to rollmg terram and is currently developed except for north of the property. 13 The existing buildings, uses and development standards were approved under a Precise Plan (PP -12) in 1972 The Precise Plan was previously amended by PP 73 -3, PP 74-10, PP 94-1, and PP 96 -1 14 The proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with State guidelines and local requirements, a Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for EA -350 was prepared and circulated for interdepartmental and affected agency review No significant adverse impacts were identified which could not be mitigated to an insignificant level, including impacts to traffic /circulation, risk of upset, air quality and public services The applicant is requesting a determination that the requested actions of the City are within the scope of the development limits established by the approval of EA -350 (which was approved with a Mitigated Negative Declaration related to environmental effects). 15 The applicant submit two (2) traffic letter reports related to the environmental effects of the proposed project (EA -041). The reports evaluated traffic and parking effects of the proposed project related to the previous approvals. The studies provide the necessary facts for required CEQA findings SECTION 1. AFTER CONSIDERING THE ABOVE FACTS, THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND STUDY OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA -401A AND PRECISE PLAN AMENDMENT 96-IA, THE CITY COUNCIL MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND REAFFIRMS THE FINDINGS OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - 350 (EA -350): f a�j►�Ii�l`uu ta1�I1tL1�$��u �� The Initial Study concluded that the previous project will not have a significant, adverse effect on the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and, That when considering the whole record. there is no evidence that the proposed modifications to the project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends, because the project is in a built -out urban environment; and, That the Planning Commission thereby recommends that the City Council authorize and direct the Director of Planning and Building Safety to file with any appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and de mimmis finding pursuant to AB 3158 and the California Code of Regulations Within ten (10) days of the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts, the applicant shall submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of $25.00 required by the County of Los Angeles for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of Determination As approved in AB 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA will not be met and no vesting shall occur until this condition is met and the required notices and fees are filed with the County. 3 OqIII PRECISE PLAN That the proposed location of the project is in accord with the purposes of the zone in which the site is located The proposed project is consistent with the intent of the Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone which allows a broad mix of uses Precise Plan 12 -72, which established the design of the existing facilities and the placement of essential related facilities such as parking, traffic circulation, and loading, is significantly altered by the proposed amendment However, studies prepared by the applicant and reviewed by the City indicate that no significant increase m environmental of em will occur The amendments are consistent with the purposes of a Precise Plan which, like a Specific Plan or a Planned Residential Development, provides the flexibility to allow for deviation from specific site development standards to achieve the overall design for the site GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY That the proposed use is consistent with the following General Plan goals, objectives, and policies The General Plan Land Use Designation for the site, as well as the zoning, is Urban Mixed - Use South (MU -S) In accordance with the General Plan, "The Urban Mixed -Use South designation allows a mixture of uses including office, hotels and retail. Light industrial uses are allowed with discretionary approval. b The Urban Mixed -Use South designation is designed to allow for a flexibility of uses near the three proposed and one future Green Line transit stations. The MU -S designation allows an FAR of 1.3, the maximum density allowed in the area, since traffic and air quality impacts associated with higher densities can be more easily mitigated with mixed uses in close proximity to mass transit. Fmdmgs must be made that the project is in conformance with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan in order to approve the project. Interpretation of conformity with the applicable provisions of the General Plan is a policy decision that is at the discretion of the Planning Commission and the City Council The proposed project is in conformance with many General Plan goals, policies and objectives related to Economic Development, Land Use, Circulation and Air Quality. The following Economic Development objectives and policies apply; ED 1 -1.1, ED 1 -1.2, ED 1 -2. ED 1 -2.1, ED 1 -2.2, and ED 1 -2.3, which relate to prioritizing economic development, diversification of an economic base, expanding the retail and commercial base, targeting industries that balance economic development and quality of life goals, and balancing development with resource and infrastructure capacity Many Land Use goals, policies and objectives apply including, LU 4, LU 4-1.1, LU 4-14, LU 4-3.1, LU 4-3.6, LU 4-4, LU 4-4.3, LU 4-4.6, LU 44 7, LU 4.5, LU 7 -1.2 and LU 7 -2.3. These issues relate to providing a stable tax base, providing landscaping, encouraging ground floor retail use in a mixed -use environment, providing synergistic relationships with mixed uses and ensuring a mix of uses in the Urban Mixed -Use area, encouraging alternative transportation modes, providing good accessibility to transportation routes, and requiring adequate public facilities and underground utilities 4 100 Circulation Element policies and objectives also apply to the proposal mcluding; C 1 -1.13, C 1 -2.1, C 1 -3.2, C 2 -1.6, C 2 -3.3, C 3 -1, C 3 -1.1, C 3 -1.2, C 3 -1.5, C 3 -1.7, and C 4-1.2 These policies identify the need for full examination of project traffic impacts and complete mitigation, a hierarchy and street classification system correlated to capacity and function, incorporation of off - street loading facilities, facilities designed for easy pedestrian access, pedestrian linkage to the Green Line, evaluation of circulation system impacts, full mitigation of all project- related circulation impacts, integration of transportation with land uses and surrounding environments, requiring developers to pay for mitigation measures, adequate pedestrian and bicycle access and evaluation of project impacts on CMP routes f The final policies and objectives which apply to the proposed project are contained within the Air Quality Element including, AQ 7 -1.1 and AQ 12 -1.2, which relate to requiring conformance with the SCAQMD PM10 standards and encouraging energy conservation features in new building design SECTION 2. THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY APPROVES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA- 401A (EA 401A) REAFFIRMING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - 350 (EA- 350) AND ADOPTS ITEMS 8, 9, AND 10 OF PRECISE PLAN AMENDMENT 96 -1A, AS DESCRIBED BELOW Amendment (Item No. 8) to the Precise Plan Circulation Plan (Condition No. 8 of City Council Resolution No. 4034) to relocate the proposed passenger drop -off arts from along the west side of Nash Street to an area on the ground floor of the parking structure at 871 South Nash Street, or to another location within the project site, to be proposed by the apphcant, with the approval of City staff. Amendment (Item No. 9) to the Precise Plan (Condition No. 28 of City Council Resolution No 3917) to permit the applicant to manage the parking in the 871 South Nash Street parking structure and surface parking lots adjacent to the 2041 Rosecrans Avenue officelretail building in order to reserve parking for office tenants, restaurant and retail patrons for the 2041 Rosecrans Avenue building, in addition to valet parking for the 2041 Rosecrans Avenue building and theaters. Amendment (Item No 10) to the Precise Plan to install a limited number of permanent tables, chaos, signs, and other amenities in the plaza area between the Pacific Theatre building at 831 South Nash Street and the office building at 2041 Rosecrans Avenue and entry court within the 2041 Rosecrans Avenue building Retail sales and other ancillary uses which are supportive of the sites primary retail, office, and entertainment uses are added to the precise plan as permitted uses in the plaza and entry court areas. SECTION 3. THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY APPROVES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA- 401A AND ADOPTS AND CERTIFIES PRECISE PLAN AMENDMENT 96-IA AS AN AMENDMENT TO PRECISE PLAN 12 -72, PP 73 -3, PP 94-1. AND PP 96-1 STATED AS ITEMS 8, 9, AND 10, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. 5 l0I All required Circulation Plan elements, including, but not limited to, providing a passenger drop -off area on the ground floor of the 871 South Nash Street parking structure, shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for P.F. Chang's China Bistro restaurant. The passenger drop -off area shall be deemed approved unless disapproved by the City by written nonce to the applicant within 30 days from the date the City receives written notice from the applicant that the passenger drop -off area has been installed. In the event that the City disapproves the proposed location or operational aspects of the passenger drop -off area, said area shall be relocated, or operations modified, and installed in a location proposed by the applicant and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety, Director of Public Works, and Police and Fire Chiefs The applicant may make minor permanent changes to the approved location of the passenger drop - off area and/or minor permanent adjustments to the operation of the passenger drop -off area, subject to the approval of the Directors of Planning and Building Safety and Public Works, and Police and Fire Chiefs. The 871 South Nash Street parking structure and the surface parking lot adjacent to 2041 Rosecrans Avenue shall be operated and managed by the property owner in a manner as to facilitate the approved Circulation Plan, as amended. This may include, but not be limited to, designating parking spaces for specific tenants in the 2041 Rosecrans Avenue building with time restrictions deemed appropriate by the property owner, valet parking, employee parking for the theaters, and prolubinng self parking for theater patrons. The applicant shall consult with the Director of Planning and Building Safety on proposed parking modifications to deternnne if the changes would significantly impact overall traffic and on -site circulation. The City reserves the authority to periodically review on -site traffic and circulation and to require the applicant to modify any proposed parking modifications which result in a material and adverse impact to the said property or which compromise the overall traffic and on -site circulation for the project. The applicant shall submit parking counts for the theater surface parking lot m conjunction with the circulation and traffic review required by Condmon No. 15 of City Council Resolution No. 4034 for EA -401, PP 96 -1. If the parking review indicates that theater parking demand during weekdays before 6.00 p.m. exceeds the available parking in the surface parking lot on the north and west side of the theater building, the applicant shall be required to provide additional self parking for theater patrons This may be achieved by increasing the size of the theater's surface parking lot, by permitting self parking in the 871 South Nash Street parlong structure or the 870 South Nash Street parking structure, or by other methods subject to the approval of the Director of Planning and Building Safety Completion of this condition, to conjunction with Condition No. 15 of City Council Resolution No 4034, shall satisfy the one (1) year status report requirement of Condition No. 13 of City Council Resolution No 3917 for EA -350, PP 94-1 The applicant may install permanent tables, chairs, benches, signs, outdoor retail operations, and other amenities in the plaza area between the Pacific Theatre building at 831 South Nash Street and the office building at 2041 Rosecrans Avenue and within the entry court of the 2041 Rosecrans Avenue building These amenities are subject to the review and approval of the Director of Planning and Building Safety, and Police and Fire Chiefs prior to installation These amenities may not interfere with the intent or requirements of the previously recorded "No- build" Declaration of Easement, as amended, for fire protection and emergency access No additional outdoor dining areas for restaurants beyond the 1200 square feet approved as part of PP 96-1 are approved as part of this amendment. 6 1 2 Prior to approval of any building or other plans required to implement Amendment Item No.s 8, 9, and 10, the applicant shall develop plans which indicate that the protect is in substantial conformance with plans approved and on file with the Department ofPlai mng and Building Safety, including, but not hrruted, to the ctrculanon plaits, stgnage plans, and the plaza improvement plans. Any subsequent modification to the approved plans for Amendment Item No.s 8, 9, and 10 shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Planning and Building Safety and Fire Chief All work within the City public nght -of -way shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and City of El Segundo Standard Specifications. No work shall be performed in the public right -of -way without first obtaining a Public Works permit. The applicant shall pay the City's Traffic Consultant cost for the preparation, review, or analysts of materials for Condition No. 3 above. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of Precise Plan Amendment 96 -1 contained in City Council Resolution No. 4034, which are not modified by this Resolution 10 The applicant shall indetmufy, defend, protect, and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, actions, causes of action, proceedings or suits which challenge or attack the validity of the City's approval of Environmental Assessment EA -401A and Precise Plan Amendment 96-1A. ATTEST tidy Mort err; City Clerk (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM- /rte Mark D Hensley, City Attorney PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of june.1998. V Mike Gordon, Mayor of the City of El Segundo, California P \pro}tcts4401.4251ea40I\ a401=2 res 7 rr. S CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ] COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ] SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ] I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the whole number of members of the City Council of the said City is five; that the foregoing resolution, being RESOLUTION NO. 4064 was duly passed and adopted by the said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of the said Council held on the 2 "" day of June, 1998, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote* AYES: Mayor Gordon, Mayor Pro -Tem Jacobs, Councilmembers McDowell, Gaines, Wemick NOES: None ABSENT None ABSTENTION: None WITNESS MY HAND THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF SAID CITY this a day of June, 1998. ly More City Clerk, of El Soundo, California 104 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SEP ' - W6 September 16, 1999 Mr. James Hansen Interim Director of Planning & Building Safety City of E1 Segundo 350 Main Street E1 Segundo, CA 90245 Re: Taiko Foods Inc,. Building Permit application (Plan Check No. 755 -99) for a new restaurant in an existing building at 2041 Rosecrans Ave., E1 Segundo. Dear Mr. Hansen: In connection with the captioned Taiko Food's application for a building permit, as the owner of the subject premises we request that you grant a minor modification to Precise Plan PP 12 -72, as amended to allow an additional approximately 122 square feet of outdoor dining area above the approximately 369 square feet currently allowed under the Resolution referenced below and the underlying zoning code. The granting of this minor modification would bring Taiko's total outside dining area to 491 square feet. Under the provisions of City Council Resolution No 4095 (Condition No 3) the Director of Planning and Building Safety has the authority to grant a minor modification to Precise Plan PP 12 -72, as amended. We believe that our request qualifies as a minor modification. In this case the only possible issue is whether the project has sufficient parking to support the additional 122 square feet. At the current code requirement for restaurant parking of 1 per 75 square feet, the 122 additional square feet would require less than 2 additional parking spaces. The impact on the project's entire parking supply would seem insignificant when considered in the light of findings in the August 2, 1999 Traffic and Parking Report prepared by Linscott Law & Greenspan. This report which has been submitted to the City show's that at the Saturday 8:00 PM peak there is a 1,060 space parking demand which, when measured against the 1,416 space supply, results in a surplus for the entire project of 356 parking spaces. on August 3, 1999 we submitted an application for an Amendment to Precise Plan 12 -72 that would increase the allowable outdoor dinning area from 1,200 square feet to 2,500 square feet. The granting of this minor modification for 122 square feet (2 parking spaces) would allow the Taiko restaurant to proceed without waiting an additional 1 -2 months for approval of the pending amendment. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE, PO BOX 916, EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA 90245.0916 1r� (310) 640 -1520 • (310) 414 -9279 FAX CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Mr. Jim Hansen 9/16/99 Page 2 Since Taiko is anxious to start construction we request your decision as soon as possible. If approved, we would like to target the matter for the Planning Commissions next Consent Calendar. If you have any questions please contact the undersigned or Mr. Leonard Blakesley Jr. Sincerely, Jerry Saunders Contyact Project Manager C %WP5IVAS %p1666 Hand delivered cc: Leonard E. Paul Garry Blakesley, Jr. ]nF, Elected Officials Mbh Goraon, Maroc Santlre Jacobs ef"M Pre rem N cy wemrek, caurrc,l Member John G. Gwen, Calm" Member KOYMCDOW",, counert Member tinily Merhe-', CRY chrk We" am Dky rmsere, Appointed Officials Mrysbm Cray mom", D Hemmy, -y A".y Department Directors: Don Lame. hhmr, A emm cm, MMUger Jr es NF,sen, Eeoehme Deeehmeenr Inh mPhamrg/BUMbg Sehty Bret Phomee Finann Dsesm crag P -dago, Firs ChU1 Debra Bngmw, Ldmiley Thrhmy Gro mmra, Pa a chest men Green Inman Prmbe works Judy Armor. lWo m, Mbreabon f Parka w eisegundc.org itember 23, 1999 Mr Jerry Saunders Continental Development Corporation 2041 E. Rosecrans Avenue El Segundo, CA 90245 RE: Administrative Determination (AD 99 -17) for Taiko Foods, Inc, Outdoor Dining 2041 Rosecrans Ave, 831 -871 S. Nash St. Dear Mr. Saunders. The Department of Planning and Building Safety has reviewed your request for a minor modification to Precise Plan 12 -12, as amended, to allow an additional 122 square feet of outdoor dining for Taiko Foods, Inc. proposed restaurant to be located in the Beach Cities Plaza. As your letter of September 24, 1999, rightly pointed out, the Director of Planning and Building Safety is authorized to grant minor modifications to the development standards contained in the Precise Plan. Pursuant to Section 4.0 B. (Development Standard Determinations) the Director may provide administrative relief up to ten (10) percent of any development standard. In this case City Council Resolution No. 4034 established the maximum amount of outdoor dining in the Precise Plan area as 1,200 square feet. Therefore, the administrative relief for this development standard may be a maximum of 120 square feet, Based on the insignificant impacts associated with granting such administrative relief, and the fact that Continental Development Corporation has already submitted an application to amend the Precise Plan to increase the total outdoor dining area from 1,200 square feet to 2,500 square feet, it is my determination that the maximum outdoor dining area for the Beach Cities Plaza may be increased to 1,320 square feet. Pursuant to this determination, the outdoor dining area for the proposed Taiko Restaurant may be a maximum of 489 square feet. This represents a combination of 236 square of the originally approved 1200 square feet of outdoor dining, not previously used by P.F. Chang's China Bistro, 133 square feet allowed by the underlying Mixed -Use South Zoning {twenty (20) percent of the 667 square foot indoor dining area), and an additional 120 square feet granted through this administrative determination. Planning and Building Safety Department 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CalHornis 90245 -0989 Phone (314) 322 -4670 F4X IIIM 1?9 -a+a� lnr Should you have any questions, please call Paul Garry, Assistant Planner, Myself, or any other Planning Division Staff member at (310) 322 -4670, extension No.s 399 and 211, respectively Sincerely, Jqfnes N. Hansen, Itenrybirector of Planning and Building Safety cc* Leonard E. Blakesley, Jr., Continental Development Corporation Nonko Fukada, Taiko Foods, Inc. Laurie B. Jester, Senior Planner PAPlanning & Budding Safety \PAOJECTS\40D- 4251EA- 401\taiko admen det.doc 1r)8 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION September 10, 1999 Mr. Paul Garry Assistant Planner Department of Planning and Building Safety City of E1 Segundo 350 Main Street E1 Segundo, CA 90245 Re: Application for Seventh Amendment to Precise Plan pp 12 -72 Address: 2041 Rosecrans Ave. Dear Mr. Garry: Following -up on our previous conversations, in connection with the captioned application we make the following request. We request that the application be amended to provide for the updating of the Site Data included as part of Sub - Exhibit 3 to Exhibit "A" Resolution No, 4095 which was approved by the City Council on November 4, 1998. You will recall that in the Site Data table the approved Project Parking Demand was 1,330 Spaces (see number 4.OB). This was based on the Traffic and Parking Analysis prepared by Linscott Law & Greenspan dated August 8, 1997. Utilizing modeling Tables 3 & 4 of this report estimated that peak parking demand for the Project (1,330 Spaces) occurred on Saturday at 9:OOPM. As required by City Council Resolution No. 3917, on August 5, 1999, we submitted the Linscott Law & Greenspan report titled Final Status Report per Condition of Approval No. 13, EA -350. Based upon actual parking counts Table 4 estimates Project peak Parking Demand at 1,066 Spaces ( Saturday 9:OOPM). We are requesting that the parking required for the project be reduced from 1,330 spaces to 1,066 to reflect the most recent parking demand data which is based on actual parking counts. Sincerely, Jerry A. Saunders Contract Project Manager C %WP51VA51r1661 1999 Copy to Leonard E. Blakesley, Jr. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE, PO BOX 916, EL SEGUNDO. CALIFORNIA 90245 -0916 109 (310) 640 -1520 - (310) 414 -9279 FAX E N G I N E E R S ENGINEERS & PLANNERS • TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATON, PARKING 234 East Colorado Blvd, Suite 400 • Pasadena, California 91101 Phone 626 796 -2322 • Fax 626 792.0941 September 27, 1999 Mr Jerry Saunders Continental Development Corporation 2041 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 265 El Segundo, California 90245 -0916 Subject Traffic and Parking Impact Analysis Additional Outdoor Dining Area - EA492 Continental Park Retail/Theater Project, El Segundo, California Dear Mr Saunders As requested, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers, is pleased to prepare this Traffic and Parking Impact Analysis in connection with EA -492, the proposed addition of 1,300 square feet (SF) of outdoor dining area at the existing Continental Park RetaiMeater Project, 2041 Rosecrans Avenue in the City of El Segundo, California. Briefly, we conclude that the small number of additional peak hour vehicle trips, 10 to 12 trips on a weekday, and 14 trips on a Saturday, generated by the proposed 1,300 SF of outdoor dining area, will not significantly impact existing or future traffic conditions. Similarly, the 17 code required parking spaces will not significantly impact parking availability This is based on the traffic and parking counts conducted in connection with the Final Status Report, dated August 2, 1999, with the project at almost full occupancy at that tune, which showed that the project produces significantly less traffic and parking than approved in EA -350 Project Description The proposed project is a 1,300 SF addition to the approved 1,200 SF of outdoor duung area at 2041 Rosecrans Avenue. Vehicle Trip Generation As shown in the following table, the 1,300 SF outdoor dining addition is expected to generatel0 vehicle trips in the weekday PM commute hour (7 arriving and 3 departing) and 12 vehicle trips in the weekday peak evening during hour (7 amvmg and 5 departing) Phi6pM Linscon P E iRel I lack M Greenspan P E WdLamA Law PE IRV, Paul W Wilkinson P E lohn P Keating P E Day id S Shenoer P E 110 Costa Mesa - 714 641 -1587 9 San Diego - 619 299.3090 • Las Vegas - 702 451 -1920 • An LC2WB Company Mr. Jerry Saunders Continental Development September 27, 1999 Page Two E N G I N E E R S On a Saturday, the peak evening dining hour generation is expected to total 14 vehicle trips (8 amvmg and 6 departing). Daily traffic generated by the 1,300 SF outdoor dining addition is forecast at 118 vehicle trips on a weekday and 162 vehicle trips on a Saturday (equally split between in and out). The commute peak hour and evening dining peak hours are shown, since the additional outdoor dining area is not expected to be used in the morning VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION pi Commute PM Peak Hour Evening Dining Peak Hour 24 -Hour Traffic Weekday 10 12 118 Saturday -- 14 162rn 111 Source Trip Generation, 6" Edition, Institute of Transportation Eugmeers Land Use Code 83, Quality Sit -down Restaurant. Average vehicle trip generation rates per 1,000 SF 121 Based on evening dining peak hour equal to 8 7 percent of 24 -Hour traffic, as determined from analysis of weekday trip generation factors Traffic Analysis Referring to the Final Status Report, examination of Figure 2C, which illustrates the key Saturday evening (7:00 PM to 8.00 PM) traffic period, shows an actual count of 1,070 vehicles (650 arriving and 420 departing). Figure 16, in the approved EA -350 Traffic Impact Study Report, dated April 17, 1995, shows a forecast of 2,224 vehicle trips (1,270 arriving and 954 departing). Comparing the approved EA -350 traffic forecast to the physical count, reveals that actual trip generation is about half (51.9 percent) of the approved EA -350, as shown below. The measured key 7:00 PM to 8:00 PM traffic volume is 1,154 vehicle trips less than forecast On this basis, since the 14 Saturday evening dining peak hour trips, will produce a 1.3 percent increase in existing traffic, which will account for 12 percent of the 1,154 trip surplus (forecast vs. actual), we conclude that the 1,300 SF outdoor dining addition will not significantly impact existing and future traffic conditions 7:00 PM to 8:00 PM EA -350 vs. Actual Count Arriving Traffic Departing Traffic Total Traffic EA -350 Traffic Forecast 1,270 954 2,224 Actual Traffic Count 650 420 1,070 Difference 620 534 1,154 Percent Dtffereitce <48 8 ° /,> <56 0" /6> <51 90/.> 111 E N G I N E E R S Mr. Jerry Saunders Continental Development September 27, 1999 Page Three It should be noted, that the significant difference between the EA -350 traffic forecast and the actual traffic count, is a result of the EA -350 "worst- case" traffic forecast, which assumed all retail use in the second and third floors of 2041 Rosecrans These upper floors currently contain offices, and are likely to remain as office use, which generates nominal evening traffic. Also contributing to the lower traffic count is the spreading out of movie start times, an operational characteristic evidenced in most large multi- screen theaters. Parking Analysis Referring to the Final Status Report, Table 4 presents the Continental Park Retail/Entertamment parking supply -demand analysis, and shows a surplus of 350 spaces at 9:00 PM (1,416 space supply - 1,066 space peak demand at 9 00 PM = 350 space surplus). Code required parking, at 1.0 spaces per 75 SF, for the 1,300 SF outdoor dining addition is 17 spaces (1,300 SF /75 SF =17 spaces) This represents a 1.6 percent increase in existing parking demand, and a decrease of 4.9 percent in the 350 space surplus. Since the Continental Park Retail/Entertainment project was at almost full occupancy at the time the Final Status Report parking counts were made, we conclude that the 17 parking spaces required for the 1,300 SF outdoor dining addition will not produce a significant impact on existing and future parking availability We welcome the opportunity to prepare this Traffic and Parking Analysis. Should there be any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to call me at 626.796.2322, or to e-mail me directly at Jreenspan@llgpasadena.com Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers J ck"M Greenspan, P.E rincipal O VOB FILEU67M67ORPT3 WD 1!2 E N G I N E E R S —- ENGINEERS & PLANNERS a TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATION, PARKING 234 East Colorado Blvd Suite 400 a Pasadena Cahtorrlta 91101 Fu' — r; Zi.. Phone 626796-2322 a Fax 626792-0941 August 2, 1999 Mr Jerry Saunders Continental Development Corporation 2041 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 265 El Segundo, California 90245 -0916 REFERENCE. 1- 962670 -3 SUBJECT. Final Status Report Per Condition of Approval No. 13, EA -350 Continental Park RetaiUTheater Project El Segundo, California Dear Mr. Saunders: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers, is pleased to submit this Final Status Report in conformance with City of El Segundo Condition of Approval No. 13, EA -350, Continental Park RetaiVTheater Project, El Segundo, California. This Final Status Report complements the Six Month Status Report prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan on August 26, 1997, and attached as Appendix A Existing Conditions The Continental Park RetaiUTheater project has been completed, and all but approximately 1,900 square feet of rentable space on the ground floor ofthe 2041 Rosecrans Avenue building is occupied. The approved theater and the plaza between the theater and 2041 Rosecrans were completed in late 1996 Since that time, the plaza has been improved. The driveway on Nash Street has been closed and reconstructed. An architectural fence has been installed which separates Nash Street from the plaza, and the plaza reconfigured for pedestrians only. All of the approved parking facilities are in place and open, and a valet parking service is provided on the west side of the plaza next to the 870 Nash Parking Structure. It should also be noted that a smaller theater, with 159 fewer seats, and two less screens has been built by Pacific Theaters. The planned restaurant (McCormick & Schmick) and valet parking station on the east side of Nash Street is open. The mid -block crosswalk on Nash Street, which tames pedestrian traffic between the large 870 Nash Parking Structure on the east side of the street and the theater on the west side of the street, and the pedestrian actuated traffic signal remain in operation. PhihpM Lmscon P E Rc lack M Greenspan P E Wdharn A Law PE Bel Paul W Wilkinson P E lohn P Healing P E David S Shender P E Costa Mesa - 714 641 -1587 a San Diego - 619 299 -3090 a Las Vegas - 702 451.1920 a An LG2WB Company t 1 � Mr. Jerry Saunders Continental Development August 2, 1999 Page Two E N C I N E E R 5 Final Traffic, Parking, and Pedestrian Survey The final survey oftraffic and pedestrian levels, and parking, was conducted on Friday, May 14, and Saturday, May 15, 1999 Turning movement traffic counts were made at the key access points and internal intersections and driveways to document current operational characteristics. Hourly parking counts were also conducted in all of the supporting parking facilities beginning at 5 00 PM, and ending at 10:00 PM on both Friday and Saturday. Figures 1A through 1E, located at the rear of this Letter Report (in front of Appendix A), present the hourly results of the Friday, May 14, 1999, velucle and pedestrian counts, and Figures 2A through 2E present the Saturday, May 15, 1999, vehicle and pedestrian counts. Table 1, following the figures, presents the hourly parking survey results by parking facility. Pedestrian Traffic A key access and circulation feature is the crosswalk and pedestrian actuated traffic signal on Nash Street. The crosswalk and signal provide a safe, controlled and lighted area for pedestrian passage between the 870 Nash Parking Structure on the east side of Nash Street and the Pacific Theaters on the west side of Nash Street. Table 2 presents the hourly number of pedestrians crossing Nash Street who were observed to use the crosswalk, and the number who were seen to jaywalk (between the 870 Nash Parking Structure on the east side of Nash Street and the west side of Nash Street). Also shown is the percent of pedestrian traffic using the crosswalk and the percent jaywalking. Looking at Table 2, it can be seen that the peak pedestrian volume observed crossing Nash Street on Friday evening occurred between 9:00 PM and 10:00 PM. During that tune, 1,074 pedestrians crossed Nash Street; 995 (92.6 percent) in the crosswalk, and 79 pedestrians (7.4 percent) Jaywalking As shown on Table 2, the peak pedestrian Similar pedestrian volume observed crossing Nash Street on Saturday evening also occurred between 9:00 PM and 10:00 PM. During that time, 1,080 pedestrians crossed Nash Street; 995 (92.1 percent) in the crosswalk, and 85 pedestrians (7.9 percent) Jaywalking. A total of 7,860 pedestrians were observed over the 10 hour Friday- Saturday survey period, with 7,333 pedestrians (93.3 percent) using the signalized crosswalk, and 527 pedestrians (6.7 percent) jaywalking. The results of the pedestrian traffic survey show that the plaza improvements (the Nash Street driveway closure, architectural fence, and plaza reconfiguration) have discouraged jaywalking. A significant reduction in the number of Jaywalking pedestrians has been achieved. The total number of Jaywalkers has gone from 35.3 percent in August, 1997, to 6.7 percent in May, 1999; an 81 percent reduction in the number of pedestrians crossing Nash Street outside of the signalized crosswalk 114 Mr. Jerry Saunders Continental Development August 2, 1999 Page Three E N G I N E E R S Further examination of the Saturday data shows 1,031 pedestrian crossings ofNash Street between 7:00 PM and 8:00 PM. The EA -350 pedestrian forecast for the completed project for this same period was 2,340 pedestrians. Existing hourly theater pedestrian traffic is less than half of the predicted volume. In our opinion, the lower hourly pedestrian volumes crossing Nash Street are a result of the current Pacific Theaters operation strategy, which spreads out movie start times to reduce box office crowding and waiting Imes Vehicle Traffic Again referring to EA -350, a Saturday evening (7:00 PM to 8:00 PM) traffic volume of 1,278 vehicles was predicted (780 arriving, 498 departing). Examination of Figure 2C shows an actual count of 1,070 vehicles (650 arriving, 420 departing). This comparison illustrates that the existing hourly traffic is less than predicted. In our opinion, the lower hourly traffic volumes are also a result of the spreading out of the movie start times, an operational characteristic evidenced in most large multi- screen theaters. Parking Table 3 presents a comparison of the actual number of vehicles parked to the Cumulative Mixed -Use Shared Parking Model employed in EA -350, and revised in our Supplemental Traffic and Parking Study of August 15, 1997 (see Table 5 and Table 6 from that report in Appendix B). However, it should be noted that the number of parked vehicles shown in Table 3 includes the office building and restaurant parking (McCormick and Schmick, and Wolfgang Puck) in the 870 Nash Street Parking Structure. Looking at Table 3, it can be seen that in all but one instance (Saturday evening at 8:00 PM), the actual number of vehicles occupying parking spaces is significantly less than the number of parking spaces predicted to be needed by the Cumulative Shared Parking Demand Model. Examination of the model tables in Appendix B, indicates a conservative treatment of Friday evening and Saturday evening office parking demand Taking into account the location and type of office use, the modeled Friday and Saturday evening office parking demand is overstated, which in turn overstates total parking demand. Table 4 presents the parking supply - demand analysis for the Continental Park Retail/Entertamment only The number of parked vehicles is adjusted for the parking demand generated by the restaurant and offices uses in the 870 Nash Parking Structure, with the adjusted parking demand measured against the parking supply to determine if there is a parking surplus or deficiency - 115 E N C I N E E R S Mr. Jerry Saunders Continental Development August 2, 1999 Page Four A parking supply of 572 spaces (all on the west side of Nash Street) is assumed for Friday at 5:00 PM, and 1,416 spaces (572 spaces on the west side of Nash, and 844 spaces on the east side ofNash in the 870 Nash Parking Structure) after 5:00 PM on Friday, and all day Saturday. Looking at Table 4, it can be seen that there are no deficiencies Table 4 also shows that at the Saturday &-O@-PM peak, there is a4-,G" space adjusted parking demand, which when measured against the 1,416 space supply, results in a surplus of- 36frparking spaces. yoo It6� 35�� Findings and Conclusions 1 Based on the results of the vehicle and pedestrian traffic counts, and the hourly parking surveys, We find both the measured vehicle and pedestrian traffic volumes, and the number of parked vehicles, to be less than the approved traffic and parking forecast. We also conclude that the plaza improvement has discouraged jaywalking, and significantly reduced the number of pedestrians who do not use the mid -block crosswalk and pedestrian signal, from 35.3 percent (August, 1997), to 6.7 percent (May, 1999). We welcome the opportunity to prepare this Final Status Report. Should there be any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to call me at 626.796.2322, contact me directly via a -mail at Jgreenspan@llgpasadena.com. Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Via,. Jack M. Greenspan, P.E. Principal Attachments O V00_FILE126 "REPORM67ORPT2 WPD 116 0 ROSECRANS f XX - VEHICLE COUNT — (XX) - PEDESTRAN COUNT LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN E N G I N E E R 5 �a • No Traffic Count Data Collected o NJ • No Traffic Count Data Coiected 1A EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES qNp FRIDAY, MAY 14, 1999 5W - 6W PM NOT TO eCALE CONMENTAL PARK RETALfn*ATM 117 a LINSCO17 1B LAW & EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN ® FRIDAY, MAY 14, 1999 6.00 — 7:0 PM o E N O I N E E K S NOT TO SCALE CONTINIMAL PARK FiETAL17HF-AIER IFs PARK -42 PLACE PAMW wT is r zy 0 • HU PAo simcn a —( mww PA1on w xui n.vw "LaT _ ` we I� O Z IRS __QQ Jt� �-12S 132J �1rN �fi %01 1 ROSECF?ANS � gsll AVENUE 0 — XX -VEHICLE COUNT —(XX) - PEDESTRAN COUNT • No Traffic Court Data Cobcted s a LINSCO17 1B LAW & EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN ® FRIDAY, MAY 14, 1999 6.00 — 7:0 PM o E N O I N E E K S NOT TO SCALE CONTINIMAL PARK FiETAL17HF-AIER IFs LAW GUENSPAN E N G I N E E It 5 1C EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRIDAY, MAY 14, 1M 760 - BOO PM NOT TO BCAI.E CONM ENTAL PARK RETAIUTMEATER W* clip, a� PARK PLACE sow-- r rMOa wr OF MAIN g 73 `�,z2 � m - - co o PACM lWA,a ►AFXao arruc,IRE —(sw QI M�.1 FARM •TFIIJC7tM oowr� ro� VALur t:! 0 - fLSI % . • am 0 PKIIIECPAPIR �l J� JAI J 1 l X92 X272 X122 12V X71 r 5 2� ROSECRAN3 � a� AVENUE �� 0 — XX - VEHICLE COUNT — (XX) - PEDESTRAN COUNT • No Traft Cant Data Cdeeled LAW GUENSPAN E N G I N E E It 5 1C EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRIDAY, MAY 14, 1M 760 - BOO PM NOT TO BCAI.E CONM ENTAL PARK RETAIUTMEATER W* PAN= trr as twee ►ACM INKM ►AP@= 2"WaTt/E on kw L729 Ai 1 PARK �A R 1 I `rr-r NPIM �8 MI00 g w cnm w•w I �&2 bt tn 9 sa3 96a r m 3w X50 4D� 12a� ROSECRANS �� AVENUE r— XX - VEHICLE COUNT r—(XX) - PEDESTFRAN COUNT e � 7J) s e � 3J) • No Traffic Ca+d Data Cobded LINSCOTT 1D 1 L4 & EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN ® FRIDAY, MAY 14, 1M 6:00 - 900 PM e t E n a 1 N E E R S NOT TO eCALE COMOUAL PARK RETAUTWATS 1'>O FARM Lm b %am ►MONO 91"J nm 011Nl1 VALET ►ACM THWER no tA)BECKWO QJJ lm J x.15 31— ROSECRANS sy; Avt�uE — XX - VEHICLE COUNT — (XX) - PEDESTRIAN COUNT LAW & GREENSPAN E N G I N E E R S NOT TO SCALE PARK r � it $n l�Iry I ^I N o QJJ lm J x.15 31— ROSECRANS sy; Avt�uE — XX - VEHICLE COUNT — (XX) - PEDESTRIAN COUNT LAW & GREENSPAN E N G I N E E R S NOT TO SCALE ►AIp10 � •IDNOA�1 E fA IM l�Iry I ^I N QJJ lm J x.15 31— ROSECRANS sy; Avt�uE — XX - VEHICLE COUNT — (XX) - PEDESTRIAN COUNT LAW & GREENSPAN E N G I N E E R S NOT TO SCALE o � Ig O 91 L70 11uf - • No Traffic Cant Data Calected 1E EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRIDAY, MAY 14, 1999 WO -10 0 PM COWWWAL PARK WrALM- EATM 21 � I I o � Ig O 91 L70 11uf - • No Traffic Cant Data Calected 1E EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRIDAY, MAY 14, 1999 WO -10 0 PM COWWWAL PARK WrALM- EATM 21 a j bM PL PAS 409 ACE rARM '°r r LO N I� f fit i Cl s J j °1 m rACM PAR= nALCTM m mum 194 Fwoa awieme ooKW nw _ VALET ` ID (28)� l2" O I10lOIM/ Z J 1 l gas �N9 X44 1W rlb 4p,� r 1�4h �r � ROSECRANS rRg AVENUE 0 g XX -VEHICLE COUNT r-- W) - PEDESTRIAN COUNT s LINSCO77 2A LAW & EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN SATURDAY, MAY 15, IM 500 - 6A0 PM o E N G I N E E R S NOT TO BCAL.E CONTiV WrAL PARK RETAL/THEATER 122 LINSCOTT 2B LAW & EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN ® SATURDAY, MAY 15, 7999 6W - 7:0 PM a E N G I N E E R S NOT TD BOALE CONTNE14TAL PARK AETAL,%i C-AlM 123 PARK PLACE r r Lor '°r a ww r F-r-- I I I PACIFIC nfATO smaTm m ww (350) — FARM sTmamm VDKW � ae PLAZA WLEf sl -' l 4 a , 1 s Ana z � J� J Jll ` �� .77 vae R03ECRANS AVENUE 0 C — XX - VEHICLE COUNT ° —(XX) - PEDE6TPoAN COUNT LINSCOTT 2B LAW & EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN ® SATURDAY, MAY 15, 7999 6W - 7:0 PM a E N G I N E E R S NOT TD BOALE CONTNE14TAL PARK AETAL,%i C-AlM 123 a PAPOW nor w tam PAFKM sl"icnm Q\ ram VALET Y J PACM 7mUl 1 I (2 .—W) ►AIRED emcnpa OO VANK usa D4� �f! 3J ROSECRANS �7 — XX -VEHICLE COUNT — (XX) - PEDESTRIAN COUNT LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN qNp E N G I N E E R S NdT TO SC`Jt C ' \ Q \ 91 N / r� c'W F_ 2C EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES SATURDAY, MAY 15, 1999 7:00 - 8:00 PM CONTIMWAL PARK RETALMEMER 124 PARK 1 $�S (2 .—W) ►AIRED emcnpa OO VANK usa D4� �f! 3J ROSECRANS �7 — XX -VEHICLE COUNT — (XX) - PEDESTRIAN COUNT LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN qNp E N G I N E E R S NdT TO SC`Jt C ' \ Q \ 91 N / r� c'W F_ 2C EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES SATURDAY, MAY 15, 1999 7:00 - 8:00 PM CONTIMWAL PARK RETALMEMER 124 F9 ►/PISS Lcrr al NAW rwwa atuenjE mww YN.Ef t rAao ,mu,m PARK 2-3! R� I' F 07� 25 I y Z%1 36" ROSECRANS AVENUE XX -VEHICLE COUNT r-- (XX) - PEDESTRIAN COUNT LAW & GREENSPAN E N G I N E E R S p ^t 42 9 I 077N 1 ; ♦ A , = I \ I 2D EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES SATURDAY, MAY 15, SW 600 - 9W PM Nor TO SCALE COMBS& PARK flETALnWATEii 5 rraa o taWA o h H r `0 T W� 07� 25 I y Z%1 36" ROSECRANS AVENUE XX -VEHICLE COUNT r-- (XX) - PEDESTRIAN COUNT LAW & GREENSPAN E N G I N E E R S p ^t 42 9 I 077N 1 ; ♦ A , = I \ I 2D EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES SATURDAY, MAY 15, SW 600 - 9W PM Nor TO SCALE COMBS& PARK flETALnWATEii 5 v tos- - XX — VEi1CL.E COUNT — (XX) — PEDESTRIAN COUNT LAW & GREENSPAN E N G I N E E R S NDT TO BCALE3 T1m r= �s7�J1 J� �S :1— ``�, , 1�1 2E EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES SATURDAY, MAY 15, 1999 900 -100 PM OONTP04TAL PNK AETAILMHEATO 126 E N G I N E E R 5 Table 1 NUMBER OF VEHICLES PARKED [11 Continental Park Retail/ Theater Fnrl" Mav 14. 1999 LOCATION NO. SPACES TIME 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 Surface Lot -831 Nash 177 161 156 161 173 170 168 Surface Lot -2041 Rosecrans 47 32 38 43 42 35 45 Parking Structure - 871 Nash 348 118 126 154 168 155 139 Parkino Structure - 870 Nash 844 563 638 758 912 841 776 Surface Lot - North Side 870 Nash NIA 121 24 25 29 31 31 32 TOTAL 1.416 898 993 1145 1326 1232 1160 Saturdav Mav 15 1999 LOCATION NO. SPACES TIME 5:00 6:00 7 :00 8:00 9:00 10:00 Surface Lot -831 Nash 177 166 169 168 171 176 171 Surface Lot -2041 Rosecrans 47 40 45 46 46 41 34 Parking Structure - 871 Nash 348 96 127 181 211 199 149 Parkinc Structure - 870 Nash 844 426 477 724 952 939 828 Surface Lot - North Side 870 Nash NIA f2l 21 27 36 36 31 25 TOTAL I 1416 749 8,116 1.155 1A16 11,386 1207 [11 Includes office budding and restaurant parking (McConmdt 8 Schmicks and Wolfgang Puck) in 870 Nash Parking Structure (21 This parking tot is not allocated to Retadlrheater project. Parked vehicles are attributed to the protect for inclusion in total measured demand 127 0 z ` y m O O aW � t Vr Q r N � � mr (n Y �aCL W— a m W = Ix C CO O V 2 N Q z 0) 0) 7 N r 6 eh O A O C r W A A Lq N C W 'C 7 m C6 °v o) � WC O O. Ein 7 O Lo > N W C m i U L W N to cn c W H c m y � n vt- � A O � a� � U L U rQ l2P O O • O O • W to Q O Q1 O y W ONi ~ O Q) A O o IL 0 e cc m Off r 0W) o o O O O) O Z {o A A tC fG tG �- o e • e e W c A O f0 7 O IL 0) O O 0m) W O W C r r s r (p r A N N pf 10 o ° K LU m m U) Q � N j O to 0) Lf) O W w a Z �) H N W 10 Lf) O Co O CL 6e W a)) O O Off O O "r eIL ul 4" 41 91 a 4 CP e z w iD A l+) CO co O O r) _ OOf lq N < A z e a e e Y iC iG W N to co O co N O m A CL W g d V V V i; o C ul ° N O O 1f) O OA) 2 � A e e o e • W m N O O N O Io t00 ao CL A 0) N C o OD 0 C 0 R A e y e ie C e° ° to 0) T ? N N N N Lo Ln O )n C n z in n O O N Y J A J A C 0 �m m 0 J L) m m N3 N J2 `o0 N m C C to OO _= > W 1 c a L woo Q ca c Qf v in m W ` S m W 9 9 m m LL n W n a m a m A o o o m o m o a zaza� -o r 6 eh O A O C r W A A Lq N C W 'C 7 m C6 °v o) � WC O O. Ein 7 O Lo > N W C m i U L W N to cn c W H c m y � n vt- � A O � a� � U L U rQ l2P E N G I N E E R S Table 3 ACTUAL COUNT vs. CUMULATIVE SHARED PARKING MODEL Continental Park Retail( Theater DAY TIME t1l NO PARKED SHARED [2] PARKING MODEL DIFFERENCE ACTUAL vs MODEL PERCENT DIFFERENCE Friday 05/14/99 500 PM 898 1,145 -247 -216 6 00 PM 983 1263 -280 -222 7 00 PM 1,145 1,321 -176 -133 B 00 PM 1,326 1,543 -217 -141 9 00 PM 1,232 1,614 -382 -237 10.00 PM 1,180 1622 -462 -285 Saturday 05/15199 5.00 PM 749 965 -216 -224 6 00 PM 845 1,243 -398 -320 7,00 PM 1,115 1,312 -197 -120 B OO PM 1,416 1,438 -20 -14 9 00 PM 1,386 1,650 -264 -160 10 00 PM 1,207 1 588 -361 -M0 111 Number of parked vehicles Includes office budding and restaurant parking (McCormick b Schmicks and Wolfgang Puck) in 870 Nash Parking Structure 12) Table 5 and table 8; Supplemental Traffic and Parking Study, Lmscotl, Law and Greenspan, August 15, 1997 r 2 9 E N G I N E E R S Table 4 PROJECT PARKING SUPPLY - DEMAND ANALYSIS Continental Park Retail/ Theater DAY TIME NO. PARKED NON- PROJECT ADJUSTED DEMAND SUPPLY 131 vs. DEMAND RESTAURANT [11 OFFICE M TOTAL Friday 05114/99 5 00 PM 898 224 503 727 171 401 6 00 PM 983 288 246 534 449 967 7 00 PM 1,145 320 75 395 750 666 80 PM 1.326 320 75 395 1 931 485 9 00 PM 1,232 320 32 352 880 536 10 00 PM 1,160 288 32 320 840 576 Saturday 05115/99 5 00 PM 749 192 36 228 521 895 600 PM 845 288 36 324 521 895 70 PM 1,115 304 36 340 775 641 8 00 PM 1,416 320 36 1 356 1 1,060 356 9 00 PM 1,386 320 320 1,066 350 10 00 PM 1.207 304 304 903 513 ((�� SWN4i hit, b [1] Mc Cormrck and Schmrck, and Wolfgang Puck resuure rns{ 4,000 SF at code parking rate of 1 space per 75 SF adjusted by ULI hourly factors [2] Table 5 and table 6. Supplemental Traffic and Parking StUdy; Unscott, Law and Greenspan, August 15, 1997 [3] Parking supply of 572 spaces on Fndayattec5A0 PM; parlung supply of 1,416 spaces on Friday at 5 00 PM, and all day Saturday i �%te 130 Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX A Six Mouth Status Report Linscott, Law & Greenspan August 26,1997 13; E N G I N E E R S ENGINEERS & PLANNERS • TRAFFIC TRANSPORTATION, PARKING 234 LI,l Colorado Blvd Smte 400 • Pasadena Calnorma 91101 Phone 626 796 2322 • Fax 626 792 -0941 August 26. 1997 Mr. Jerry Saunders Continental Development Corporation 2041 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 265 El Segundo, California 90245 -0916 Subject- Six Month Status Report Per Condition of Approval No. 13, EA -350 Continental Park Retail/Theater Project El Segundo, California Dear Mr Saunders Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers, is pleased to submit this Six Month Status Report in conformance to Condition of Approval No. 13, EA -350, Continental Park Retail/Theater Project, El Segundo. California. Existing Conditions The Continental Park Retail/Theater project is still under construction. The approved theater and plaza were completed in late 1996, and have been open for at least six months. Construction is still underway in the 2041 Rosecrans Building which is partially occupied. The ground floor is vacant and 35,233 net square feet (NSF) continue to be occupied on the second and third floors. All approved parking facilities are in place However, a number of parking spaces in the small parking area on the west side of 2041 Rosecrans have been taken out of service as a result of construction activity This amounted to 20 parking spaces at the time the six month survey was conducted It should also be noted that a smaller theater, with 159 fewer seats, and two less screens has been built The crosswalk and pedestrian actuated traffic signal has also been installed on Nash Street Six Month Survey The six month survey of traffic and pedestrian levels, and parking, was conducted on Friday, August I , and Sdiurday, August 2, 1997 1- urning movement traffic counts were made at the key access I•hdq,n• 1 tin• nu P I kel lu \m (.n. nynn 1'1 Wdfi ,,n A I,, 1-1 'k. 1 1 P ud N' wdi,'—'n I' I InLn I' K. IbnQ I' 1 I ).—IN Nh.-b, I'1 I ...1 1 M. v 1 1, I I I i11, • Nan Uugn b I'1 ,'ra :u'LLl • la, Vega, 701 i , I 1-120 • An I (.!w11 I ,wep tin 132 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN Mr Jerry Saunders August 26, 1997 Page Two points and internal intersections and driveways to document current operational characteristics Parking counts were also conducted in all supporting parking facilities at 6.00 PM, 8:00 PM, and 10 00 PM on both Friday and Saturday Figures 1 through 1D, located at the rear of thus Letter Report, present the hourly results of the Friday vehicle and pedestrian counts, and Figures 2 through 2D the Saturday counts Figure') illustrates the theater schedule and shows the motion pictures playing and their start times (which were the same for both Friday and Saturday evenings) It should be noted that "Air Force One" and "Men In Black" are two of the most popular of the summer's movies and are shown on multiple screens (three screens for AFO, and two screens for MIB). Estimates made by theater management prior to the counts indicated an expected overall peak occupancy of 60 percent of the 3,391 available seats Our understanding of the industry is that an overall peak occupancy of 60 percent represents a "hit movie" characteristic. Table 1, following the figures, presents the parking survey results. Pedestrian Traffic A major feature of the project is the crosswalk and pedestrian actuated traffic signal on Nash Street. The crosswalk and signal provide a safe, controlled and lighted area, for passage between the 870 Nash Parking Structure and the theater. Table 2 presents the hourly number of pedestrians crossing Nash Street who were observed to use the crosswalk, and the number who were seen to jaywalk (between the southeast comer of the parking structure on the east side of Nash and the plaza on the west side of the street) Also shown is the percent of pedestrian traffic using the crosswalk and the percent jaywalking Looking at fable 2, it can be seen that the peak pedestrian volume crossing Nash Street was observed on Friday, between 8:00 PM and 9.00 PM. During that time 915 pedestrians crossed Nash Street. 563 (61 5 percent) in the crosswalk, and 352 pedestrians (38 5 percent) Jaywalked. Further examination of the Saturday data shows 756 crossings of Nash between 7.00 PM and 8:00 PM. The LA -350 pedesu ian forecast for the completed project was 2,340 pedestrians. Existing hourly theater pedestrian traffic is significantly less than predicted. In our opinion, the lower hourly pedestrian volumes are a result of the operational characteristic which spreads out the movie start times, as illustrated in Figure 3 vehicic Traffie Again rcicnim, to EA -350, a Saturday evening (7 00 PM to 8 00 I'M) traffic volume of 1,278 vehicle~ was predicted (780 arriving, 498 departing) L•xamutauon of Figure 2B shows an actual 13 E N G1 N E E R 5 Mr. Jerry Saunders August 26, 1997 Page Three count of 1,012 vehicles (702 arriving, 310 departing). This comparison illustrates that the existing hourly theater traffic is significantly less than predicted. In our opinion, the lower hourly traffic volumes are also a result of the spread start operational characteristic which is evidenced to most of the larger multi- screen theaters. This is clearly illustrated in Figure 3 which shows the start times during the traffic survey evenings. Parking Table 3 presents a comparison of the actual number of vehicles parked to the mixed -use shared parking model employed in EA -350. Table 3 is based on existing development, which consists of the completed portions of the project, plus the adjacent office use and Wolfgang Puck restaurant, that are supported by the 870 Nash Street Parking Structure. Looking at Table 3, it can be seen that the actual number of parked vehicles is less than the number of spaces predicted by the shared parking model. Examination of the model indicates a conservative treatment of Friday and Saturday office parking demand. In this instance, taking into account the location and type of office use, the modeled Friday and Saturday evening office parking demand is overstated However, further analysts of the Saturday parking peak, employing only the modeled theater and restaurant figures, produces a demand for 941 spaces at 8:00 PM. The actual Saturday parking count at 8:00 PM was 949 vehicles (an eight vehicle difference of less than one percent). In any event, there is sufficient parking to meet existing demand. It should also be noted that the Saturday peak parking count ( 0.28 spaces per seat) validates the City requirement of one space for each three seats (0.33 spaces per seat) after allowance for circulation. We welcome the opportunity to prepare this Six Month Status Report. Should them be any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Jack Greenspan, P Eta' f _ { as 1\ Mo Principal � olt2 Attachments _Z OF 26701tr 04 134 LINSCOTT LAW & EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN qNp FRIDAY 8/1/97 s oo - 6.00 PM E H G I H E E R 5 NOT TO SCALE CONTINENTAL PARK RETAIL/THEATER PROJECT a: PARK —6 PLACE PAWL T r =A w W W < ¢ 0 N y 127 TEATER N n 1 PAWL BTLTME —92 26— \ PAIgA �1� � ONN N C L 571 O e as N +r �J �s 1 2— 1 + AolArs O nacre Z Q N pp —1077 —1471 54� 70� X69 78� , -141 1261— 1021 - 72� 133, R03ECAANS ,^, �g AVE3JUE �c'ie K � LINSCOTT LAW & EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN qNp FRIDAY 8/1/97 s oo - 6.00 PM E H G I H E E R 5 NOT TO SCALE CONTINENTAL PARK RETAIL/THEATER PROJECT i PAW.M LOT PN No sn%c m —b en .7e rte 1 Ss I 3$ 1 71E117@1 me MOMMA 6 �a l PARK —77 M— LSD PY 81N)CTW 52 u 1o� e0` � l R� + N Z Nn a 0 N C1l¢ Si W U) O J a Q or 95- r... 74� r..., trn— 12C1- 60� 162, ROSECRANS a Q AVENUE �+ s 1 N LINSCOTT 1A LAW & EXISTING TRAFFIC VOL1WES GREENSPAN N FRIDAY 8/1/97 600 — 700 PM E H c I W E E P NOT TO SCALE CONTINENTAL PARK RETAILrMEATER PROJECT OAWJ � LOT FAWJW mecrim n� �>ro w c� i y THUT61 -950 n— . 1 — - 4i204 v -53 49- PAW.M nw clm w w N 1 m' V 0 i •��QQQ'jjj- 1 31 NyyI C O 1 IIO OUZO $ Xi 0 i n 9 Z Q J I l J l l X0.1 -249 -!1 _ply in _yp 09� 92� X79 Mf X106 40� N2, ROSECRANS AVENUE EHII LINSCOTT 1, 13 -AB LAW & EXISTING TRAFFIC-VOLUMES GREENS PAN qNp FRIDAY 8/1/97 700 - 8.00 PM F 11 G 1 N E E R 5 NOT TO SCALE CONTINENTAL PARK RETAWTNEATER PROJECT LAW & 138 1C LAW &- EXISTING �� EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES `, ! p FRIDAY 8/1/97 8.00 - 9:00 PM E h1 C 1 14 E E R S NOT To SCALE CONTINENTAL PARK RETAIL/THEATER PROJECT PARK —oo PLACE q6 OD— � T( LOT r q� CN W n `2 Lr20 W S I 9n 2 o 2= N y 1 N TWATO � O PAWJW STPUCTM —498 127- ' ►ARIq f11VC1UE Nn N 282 �- r90 A `p eon 1 2W �' ^ of nOIIECP s 1 = -1 Q 8 Z Q o .—S2 2 nr� J J 1 l �A ` -57 -I -1099 -1141 82- 129 r58 55/ -88 7021- Im- 41� 97, ROSECRANS Q Qj AVENUE Rai LAW & 138 1C LAW &- EXISTING �� EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES `, ! p FRIDAY 8/1/97 8.00 - 9:00 PM E h1 C 1 14 E E R S NOT To SCALE CONTINENTAL PARK RETAIL/THEATER PROJECT PARK —37 PLACE ,�fl 4e- ., LOT � r a'= `0 f L 11 ~ LLI 2 ei m 7--, i y 0) 1201 . I N RCATS e m PAFN O —3W srwx'n�e n�wc�a l7AICiVE Nn N r l 25� 103, `�40 nei I 0� 1 Q 11086CMM + R Q 0_ Z a�. p Q %.� stn$ J 1 \ J l l —30 �24I -80 _795 _9y7 70� X38 34� X42 ✓!33741 59, r ROSECRANS R �� AVENUE °2 LINSCOTT 119 1D LAW & EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN ` LV FRIDAY 8/1/97 9.00 - 100 PM F H G I R E E ► 5 NOT TO SCALE CONTINENTAL PARK RETAIL/THEATER PROJECT rNVJ4 LOT PNRNO NOWTVE nn I l L4B rn . r vg a THEATER 62- ACElGWN s .. 9 r - 25 70 8� 74� 1 1� Z l -p 10- ►NfMO [IIUCTWE -o 1 8+e i 0 a a :1. 49 -t200 -195 40, 74J r65 �2 -91 1424- vl- 52� LION ROSECRANS ntlR AVENUE ffi'II LINSCOTT LAW & GRE REENSPAN N ' i H I _ R r1 E E It 5 NOT TO SCALE 0 e 14^ 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES SATURDAY 8/2/97 5 :00 — 6:00 PM CONTINENTAL PARK RETAIL/THEATER PROJECT rim` �2a PARK —A PLACE rngRc LOT � r aQ N L� } W `(r� W o 2 ^ Q J y y 66- � o T WER w PNRpO —� IIINJCIIIE 249 - nipq OTUCRm 3 1 l J �m X76 47- x28 2V 79, � Lr40 n $a g} . t 'we ava 1 O a Z d o �f2R F3m J J 1 '. �29 r77 1.77 - iL4 _ip7 sew er �n 46� 75 t26o- rA3- 92\ us', ROSECRANS � >� AVENUE gs6; LINSCOT 2A LAW & - EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN ( -LN� SATURDAY 8/2/97 600 - 7.00 PM E M C I HE ERs NOT TO SCALE CONTINENTAL PARK RETAIL/THEATER PROJECT 59 E L� X41 24� 76� 64- 77 1 O Q C , Q Z J 1 l 0 N n� r 9%2 00,1 V d Q l 1 J 1. 86 -' 162 i64 59-, -m I=- vu- ROSECRANS � g =a AVENUE $e� PLACE n O 1 e LINSCOTT , A ^26 LAW & EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN SATURDAY 8/2/97 7W — 8A0 PM F 11 c 1 11 E E P. 5 NOT TO SCALE CONTINENTAL PARK RETAIL/THEATER PROJECT PARK —95 f 26— , P LOT LOT 1 f an W L r 40 a y TMATER PAMPA STIIJOIVIE -z 157 - PARtNO 811RICRPE L� X41 24� 76� 64- 77 1 O Q C , Q Z J 1 l 0 N n� r 9%2 00,1 V d Q l 1 J 1. 86 -' 162 i64 59-, -m I=- vu- ROSECRANS � g =a AVENUE $e� PLACE n O 1 e LINSCOTT , A ^26 LAW & EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN SATURDAY 8/2/97 7W — 8A0 PM F 11 c 1 11 E E P. 5 NOT TO SCALE CONTINENTAL PARK RETAIL/THEATER PROJECT pN bb ..nu+c Lm rAFNQNO :nMPOWE lm /30 35� sot B5- Cl4� 976 - mh ROSECRANS II 95 1 O N �n i° 2 z z �e8 i 1 l PARK 25- PLACE e n L N O FAWt sifficrim + N �I .r O J J O a aim J i L 9E- $4, ��-- �stg' AVENUE Qa N O J 1 m LINSCOTT 1 14 3 2C LAW & EXISTING TRAFFIC -- VOLUMES GREENSPAN p SATURDAY 8/2/97 8.00 - 900 PM F t' 'G I N E E R 5 NOT TO SCALE CONTINENTAL PARK RETAIL/THEATER PROJECT °ma 7 l o + i /J PM{IIG LOT PAIKNO SINICTIm 125 30 ` a PARK -26 ( 21- i ` 2 r 48 cc iN ca TWAT 22 ' � PAIKNO rnwc m 20A 110lECANB 6� 69� o H w Q N — �e+ N ^ i 0 O Q J 1 47 801 IB 62� 97J 22 26-• 684— 806 - 21� 50 -, ROSECRANS o esi AVENUE N b 0 LINSCOTT 1 4 4 2D LAW & - EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN NFI SATURDAY 8/2/97 9 :00 - 10.00 PM F I I C I I1 E E P. 5 NOT TO SCALE CONTINENTAL PARK RETAIL/THEATER PROJECT V OQ� +^ N Q 2 / + L - 816 —807 H w Q N — �e+ N ^ i 0 O Q J 1 47 801 IB 62� 97J 22 26-• 684— 806 - 21� 50 -, ROSECRANS o esi AVENUE N b 0 LINSCOTT 1 4 4 2D LAW & - EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES GREENSPAN NFI SATURDAY 8/2/97 9 :00 - 10.00 PM F I I C I I1 E E P. 5 NOT TO SCALE CONTINENTAL PARK RETAIL/THEATER PROJECT lz UCf) U CL D z (1) LL Lu w < m 0 0 0 U_ a_ m cr ;Ft a: LU ui cr w EL 0 z Q ir W LLJ En 0 z U. cc LL z LU u 0 Z I C') LLJ _j rn C\i W Cf) LL cn < < W C uj Wac < CO < < Cf) D L.L Z c< L u z CA Lu z w LLJ ---------- O 4 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- ---- - --- - ---- I J - --- --- I ------------ I I -------- I ------ ------- --- - ---- & ---------- - - --- - --------------- - ------- - --- -------------- - ---- - --- --- ---- ------ ------ - ---- --- ---- --- - - -------- ------ ------ - --- --- - ---- - ----- - --- --- - --------------- Mn IL Z w w l U CL D z (1) LL Lu w < m 0 0 0 U_ a_ m cr ;Ft a: LU ui cr w EL 0 z Q ir W LLJ En 0 z U. cc LL z LU u 0 Z I C') LLJ _j rn C\i W Cf) LL cn < < W C uj Wac < CO < < Cf) D L.L Z c< L u z CA Lu z w LLJ L.L Z c< L u z CA Lu z w LLJ d d d C M O a C J � w C (n y M L y } d d> .y. CO = ir ca F N Y ZC7 m J Y , +`+ BE C) Q CL C C O _I U CJ Q CO N is a r aD m co m et U .— N w t0 y m C l4 m CD CD E O CA > 4) N C D .ld `° C 0 N NI� >m `5 M (D a m to c 4) w •, U E ca o 0 _ CO C. O C3 yl 0 •E O ` W Q I 0. N �I Q I N m rl CD O CA C" <C y C .0 U N 'O W Cc y CO U N w C R C > Q m H r-0 C U >:1 to N C) cc f0 d O. O Cl L U) 7 y U N a Q C-4 Z, COH D NIA. v Co co `-I CN, Lo' Cl Io r NI w i40 I I d IT co co NI t-- n v co o"ilo of H ca 7 O_ Lo Lo O I Ln w R N co Q K +� ",a M c M r CO 1, �� o G1 M O r r V tD Ito , U. r0 i� U Q NI lqr Q M co Z M Z IL f0 O J, lC yl Y' O J Q L Ui N. U = OD O Z y _ Y o;m � Z o Z co CIO J 146 d N � O L 2 U rL w t0 y C` O v l4 N U ca y E O CA > 4) N C D .ld `° C 0 N E-^ >m `5 M (D a m to c 4) w •, U E ca o 0 _ CO C. O C3 0 •E O ` W OlN N N N U 7 U C U o m C) CL 0 O U L y C .0 U N 'O W Cc y CO U N w C R C > L y m H r-0 C U U N N C) cc f0 d O. O Cl L U) 7 y U N a Q C-4 Z, COH 146 r o d Z O d C D) L •m (4) CL c O W C r c U d d Z L a ¢_ N C C •- d d F « N d W Cr a8 ~WY (L D_ cc J W « W d O F C v (q •- C i c O J Q U Z ~ _ e e e e e e W � M O ONQ CL N CL D:' O O C-4 W g'a K Oi m _. O N O A N (D CD O e e e 7 01 < en Z N' A N P7 !n m z o e \ \ o \ -00 0 0 \ w Y7 MoD O 0 N O ac; m co m ° o `h ui �° ° a O W S a Q N CCO O C3;_ - -_ _ _ - -_ Da N o Im mlm en N W OI Y], O tOD M O✓t Q (D A Z I H 2 o o e o a a o o e o e e W O O O O1 r O MIt) ens 1.. C < tD' O e aid' W tD Fi O r 4'f' Q' O r xl m A p a ^ N v O K 1� m n •- m O r to CI N tV�D 7 Al A m� o a Z r I •YI N Y• {'f Y Z �O a` a e a e' a W O O V a C n N O n N' O i S S tu °o•' D. U G V °o K W rn N (D O of _ O H z o7 Q 2 O' A ch 2 e e e e e e W O N O N co O �� N ° U CL W m °o m o O. of o c c a m C C jr N d d W o o m -01 d d N Z 2 c .0 OI a O Z O Y :t J Y m -i h y Z Q N m ; N W � nd l R U 0 m O F 0 m 0 �h A y h O U F' (� v l O J d d h a a c `01 } m 9 Ql U l C Oo o d d D. LL m I a`�I a a CD o Z 0 0 Z Z t- 0) c L (0 d d co co n O) C .j W r- 0 C A C a� O cnn L C4 n `09 N > 01 C d > tj d W O O — Cl) O M c po W V c d v m d Q 'D CD o ° � C C. 0 O � U CO 10 d � L U F- ¢ 147 r u J W c O W � V d � ^ C Z IL o) Y c W Q �„ � ad R D L C W R R fn IM: U 3 x J W R C O ~ U Z.5 c O O V U J Q F U Q A N 7 (.) 7 0) C Y R CL L N R Z O CD a '0 O0 a N N R N 7 C m co co d C R U E O 0) C '0 7 U c c N E O. O m d v m c H X W 1 *8 W Co 1 W J W Q co to I (o tD M N W O+ m `-' O Q J H LL to Q= O W O O r N (A U 0 O a co m co t°o rn m Q U = y J J LL W O P- O U m r O W N m O m N t0 OF GOD = W IL r r w O U CN co m Got IT tq U3 0 to C C m th ^ t0 Q to n O W Q U Z y Q = ~ m e ~ Y W W o e e o o o pj U a O O W LL r f0 �, 0) IL O LL W °< m m ro Go 0) co z H O =YQZfn 2 u^ m W W e e e o o- o C U 0. W LL O O T o O O) IL O LL N W m O v n tl9 rn rn O LL 0) Q N co f7 t7 C) W N R Z N LL LL O O fO CL r m H Z < Q N V W o e o e e o CL Cl) n Cl) Cl) cn O W LL CL O N W E a a a a a m o O o O O O F O O O O O O to m O to co O r n m n 0) CN LL Co to co N 7 (.) 7 0) C Y R CL L N R Z O CD a '0 O0 a N N R N 7 C m co co d C R U E O 0) C '0 7 U c c N E O. O m d v m c H X W 1 *8 Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 1 � i Table 5 and Table 6 Supplemental Traffic and Parking Study Linscott, Law & Greenspan August 15,1997 149 W J m H 2 V d O a` d m d L C A d C m IL m C d C c O U i .m m 01 n • r N N» T N r) m r O) � r P' J D) T i p a »+- rnsomnmmo �rnorna$co. - ^I Nrr i m m m.m m m m m m m m m m co w m m m N N d N N elm" N N N»� N �O d N N N N NI a Lf) 'M Qt`. 0)r O»r)r M•t{ Nn OIl N cr7N0^CQr) nQ ^bM QT N0 N Nh'�QQ�trO�^ Ito »mm0m� 40 r r 00700 b» rr m of 0'=, 4K N!mq •r)'�({p�7.' N Yfpi N Q' CO m +r-•N t!i C%l ew VDJ r01`Q`v Q•r0):Ci N.»�N%W 409 At00 t0: 409 d+O.:00f C!`O `01 Ir Ch r r) m' Q MCI N N m m n W CO WI m N mme�m•O)OOhirnano n°)- m�mmi0 T Q »w r T Q"QO m »r) b47 »NN n O> b 0m Im NO Q mm N t00>000)m001 m »N r On M0000 n r) n nc7 /� n t7 r)O "w 0)0000) 0) m h QN Z O d z a a O °000O0ab00O0O0000000oa0O`� °o °o h m.00' NrNrI Q »bl�m�Or w fIl LU W 2 S H LU W w Z CD 2 Y K Q IL a O T �] C d H � � rn 7 O N N C M d 0 7 Q L m U m N d m dca O_ 0 m 4 LL d m V m U CD m o Qom m r a d LL Z a m .0 d o- 0 m _y 0 C N 0 Z d O d `0 0 C 0 O m m— Z d d d 0 to y o u= m m d d c N N 0.-0— M O d QO ?,% m m m 0 d a m Co C7 Ln m O O > � m- V QO N.0 C C C C)dNV md�d - 'rnNCmE —E J C y V d d m d Y d ` N 7 O waddom�m C d C M r _m o 0 0 3 CO d — Y O) Y a a j d d d 0 •0 = •00 C c m`m m` c m c _c 0) 7 O 0) C o) O d c c c d- d 0 N W mrriv W mW O O d d W p y p 0 =ammmZO�LL 4, aaa -n Im m v) NU »UN mo��T000O N u N 0 0 6 L nm mmm 3 150 Z '< O W W Q � m w J m v d O d m m C Y m a m e d C c p U U' tq F YJU W ILdo 00> Z Z J ~ Y 6 cr X Q y wa J Q - Zz 0X< m K W Q ydU N v Mh Q W r = G Q 2I r Q W rn m Y n d N y � d d m U Q � h n ° aw d Q{L m V V � c Z ° v H j L ` b V C 0° C a c m LL 2 d O d o w— ° `o c10.c`m`cmi� � m m. V E mmq` uiy � d Z, b YE�g0 3mID cc s C N N 9 m m 0 d LoNCmE= E d 4 b b Q C C Q M m c m m c E °a= 3 =YmL.x awmadiamiaSZa my m o my 3 m c° c E�m`m`m�m�� cm m m d y y y N N d tn d _u Q w M b _W Lu U m d° U V U° N d O o O to m m ?` LL aU y b 0L) DUN 'CC r-- C C O O p p d O N N N m 6 U d m m m 7 2 b0 L .mm mm bm i N R VUF t0 151 / ,All. 2 S 10//�� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 350 Main Street AND BUILDING SAFETY El Segundo, CA 9024 s (310) 3224670 FAX (310) 122-4167 APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A PRECISE PLAN (SEVENTH ROJECT NoE�tr 9a2 Pr 91-1 Dalc,•iLs( a-5 Iz� 1 The applicant CONTINENTAL 2041/831 LLC -' 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE, SUITE 200, EL SEGUNDO,CA 90245 (310) 640 -1520 (Check On e) Name Address Phone Owner _ Lessee SAME AS ABOVE Agent _ Property Owners Name Address Phone Property Situated at 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE (Exact legal description Provide attachment if necessary) General Location NWC Rosecrans Ave. & Nash St. between Rosecrans Avenue and Park Place Address and Street, Avenue Street, Avenue Exisimg Zoning Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Request Under the provisions of Title 20, Section 20 86 of the Municipal Code, application for consideration of an amendment to a Precise Plan for the above described property Describe in detail the enure proposed project (type of construction, materials to be used), uses involved (e g. banl„ general office, industrial, restaurant, etc ) including buildings and other equipment necessary to the project See Attachment "A ", Item 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2 Describe the existing developmem on the site Include square footnges and uses of each building on the site See Attachment "A ", Item 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 1 Explain in detail why this particular site is especially suited for the proposed development See Attachment "A ", Item 3, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 4 Describe how the proposed project will comparelcontmsl to the development of adjacent properties and the immediate area and will not have detrimental effects to the adjacent properties or neighborhood How will potential impacts be mrugated? See Attachment "A ", Item 4, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 5 Describe the technological processes and equipment employed on -site and their compaubduy with existing and potential land uses within the general area See Attachment "A ", Item 5, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 157 OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT L(We) CONTINENTAL 2041/831 LLC the undersigned, depose and say th.0 p amAN c arei the OWNER(S) of the property involved in this application and that l(we) have familiarized myself (ourselves) will) the iuli.s and regulation of the City of El Segundo with respect to preparing and filing this application and that the foregoing statement, herein columned and the information on all documents s and all P2041a�( �ted he i� rl all resPe4tICN6 M rid �+rrect to dir best of my /our knowledge and belief tl COR 09 M9 By: ✓ —11J l`( &` '19 "ACA LotoSiNIC shi kesley. Jr. Dine EXICL" lfica President ,19_ Signature Date AGENT AUTHORIZATION AGENT AFFIDA V1T l,(We) JERRY A. SAUNDERS the undersigned, depose and say that 0 mn/We are) the AGENT(S) of the property involved in this application and that I(we) have familiarized myself (ourselves) with the rules and regulation of the City of El Segundo with respect to preparing and filing this application and that the foregoing statements herein contained and the information on all documents and all plans, attached hereto am in all respfms true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief �� S( nature erry A. :)aunacers, Date Contract Project Manager / Signature Date Procedures for filing application I File application properly completed in the office of the Department of Planning and Building Safely along with completed Initial Study Applicant Questionnaire Signature of the ownerlowners, lessee (if applicant), and /or agent shall be required on all applications 2 Applicant shall provide all information, drawings and other materials as requested by the Planning Department as indicated on the Notice to Am lreants 3 Pay filing fee (See fee schedule) 4 Applicant and affected property ownero will be notified of time of hearing 5 Applicant must be present at the hearing and may offer additional evidence to support luOier request 6 There shall be an additional fee for riling an appeal v...at.m X53 Planning Sufl D.ite received CA X49-1- , p CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND I hereby mNtonze JERRY A SAUNDERS to act for me in all matters relevant to this apphcatton I understand that this erson will be the exclusive contact on the ro eel and will be sent all information and correspondence C0NTIN TAL 2041 1 COR RATIO MANA MEMBER By: 1.� Owners A& E. Slakesley. Jr. Executive Ytw President AGENT AFFIDA V1T l,(We) JERRY A. SAUNDERS the undersigned, depose and say that 0 mn/We are) the AGENT(S) of the property involved in this application and that I(we) have familiarized myself (ourselves) with the rules and regulation of the City of El Segundo with respect to preparing and filing this application and that the foregoing statements herein contained and the information on all documents and all plans, attached hereto am in all respfms true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief �� S( nature erry A. :)aunacers, Date Contract Project Manager / Signature Date Procedures for filing application I File application properly completed in the office of the Department of Planning and Building Safely along with completed Initial Study Applicant Questionnaire Signature of the ownerlowners, lessee (if applicant), and /or agent shall be required on all applications 2 Applicant shall provide all information, drawings and other materials as requested by the Planning Department as indicated on the Notice to Am lreants 3 Pay filing fee (See fee schedule) 4 Applicant and affected property ownero will be notified of time of hearing 5 Applicant must be present at the hearing and may offer additional evidence to support luOier request 6 There shall be an additional fee for riling an appeal v...at.m X53 Planning Sufl D.ite received CA X49-1- , p ATTACENENT ^A$, TO APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A PRECISE PLAN (Seventh Amendment to PP 12 -72) dated July 23, 1999 DESCRIBE IN DETAIL ?BE ENTIRE PROPOSED PROJECT {TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS TO BE USED), OGEE INVOLVED (e.g., BANE, GENERAL OFFICE, INDUSTRIAL, RESTAURANT, ETC.) INCLUDING BUILDING AND OTEER EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO THE PROJECT. This application and "proposed project" are limited to increasing the authorized outdoor dinning area from a total of 1,200 square feet to a total of 2,500 square feet, an increase of 1,300 square feet. Precise Plan 96 -1, the fifth amendment to the original Precise Plan (PP 12 -72), was adopted by the City on September 16, 1997 (City Council Resolution No. 4034). This amendment, among other things, approved outdoor dining as a permitted use but limited the use to 1,200 square feet. The purpose of this application and proposed project is solely to increase the authorized outdoor dining from 1,200 square feet to 2,500 square feet. All 2,500 square feet of outdoor dining will be located within the "COMMON AREA" shown on Exhibit "B" titled Outdoor Dining Area, which is included with the application and incorporated herein by reference. The "type of construction materials to be use" is not deemed applicable. 2. DESCRIBE THE EXIBTING DEVELOPMENT ON THE BITE. INCLUDE BQUARE FOOTAGE AND USES OF RACE BUILDING ON TEE BITE. Existing development on the site consists of one office /retail building, one multiplex theater building, and related parking facilities. Building Address 2041 Rosecrans 871 Nash Street Gross Floor Area 83,000 sq. ft. Uses Office, retail service -type facilities including restaurants, and related p a r k i n g facilities including 4- level parking structure and surface parking 72,800 sq. ft. N u 1 t i p 1 a x theater and related parking facilities. The b u i l d i n g contains 16 screens and approximately 3,400 seats. 3. EXPLAIN IN DETAIL WRY THIS PARTICULAR BITE IS EBPRCIALLY SUITED FOR TEE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. fu,u ure 154 Application for an Amendment to a Precise Plan 7/23/99 Page 2 It has previously been determined that the site is suitable for outdoor dining. The popularity of the present outdoor dining has given rise to this request to increase the authorized outdoor dining to 2,500 square feet. 4. DESCRIBE HOW THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL COMPARE /CONTRAST TO THE DEVELOPMENT of ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND TEE IMMEDIATE AREA AND WILL NOT SAVE DETRIMENTAL EPPECTB TO TEE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OR NEIGHBORHOOD. HOW WILL POTENTIAL IMPACTS BE MITIGATED? The physical changes included in the proposed project are comparatively minor and more in the nature of modifications to the previously approved and environmentally assessed Retail/ Entertainment Complex. Therefore, it is not anticipated that the proposed project will have any significant impact on the environment or adjacent properties. However, the project will increase the demand for parking, but this increase is deemed insignificant. At the current code required parking ratio of 1 parking space for every 75 square feet of outdoor dining the additional 1,300 sq. ft. of dining area would require an additional 18 parking spaces. The Site Data table included on the approved Project Site Plan dated 6/6/98, shows Parking Demand is 1,330 spaces while the total parking provided for the project is 1,416 spaces, an excess of 86 spaces. If this excess of 86 spaces is reduced by the added "required parking" arising from the increased outdoor dining (18 spaces) the project still has an excess supply over Project Parking demand of some 68 parking spaces. DESCRIBE THE TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESSES AND EQQIPMEMT EMPLOYED ON -BITE AND THEIR COMPATIBILITY RITE EXISTING AHD POTENTIAL LAND USES WITHIN TEE GENERAL AREA. it is not anticipated that the proposed uses will employ any technological processes or equipment that will be incompatible with existing and potential land uses within the general area. CWP$1VAAtpe2 ,1 MINe '55 RESOLUTION NO. 2455 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT — 492 (EA492) AND ADOPTING THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT (PP 99 -1) TO THE BEACH CITIES PLAZA PRECISE PLAN 12 -72 (PP 12- 72), AT 2041 ROSECRANS, AND 831 AND 871 SOUTH NASH STREET. PETITIONED BY CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. WHEREAS, an application has been received from Continental Development Corporation (Applicant), requesting said approval, and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requests approval of an amendment to Precise Plan 12 -72 as amended (PP 12 -72) to provide for the following: A Amendment to PP 12 -72 to increase the total amount of permitted outdoor dining area from 1,200 square feet to 2,500 square feet, and, B Amendment of the development standards of PP 12 -72 to reduce the total required parking for the Beach Cities Plaza from 1,330 parking spaces to 1,066 parking spaces based on the actual counts contained in the Final Status Report on traffic and parking, and, accept all of the findings of the Final Status Report. WHEREAS, the Applicant and the City desire guidelines to aid in the administration of PP 12 -72 as amended; and, WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment (EA -492), including analysis of the findings of the Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for EA- 350 (a previous amendment to PP 12 -72 affecting the property), has been available for review and consideration by all interested parties, staff, and affected public agencies in the time and manner prescribed by law, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and supporting evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act, State CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No 3805), and, WHEREAS, on October 14, 1998, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law, and, 1 156 WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against the findings of Environmental Assessment EA492 and PP 99 -1, and, WHEREAS, at said hearing the following facts were established The project site is located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo approximately one (1) mile to the west of the San Diego Freeway [Interstate -405 (I -405)] 2 The project area is approximately 6 035 acres (262,900 square feet) 3 The project is generally bounded on the north by heavy industrial land uses, on the south by Rosecrans Avenue, on the east by Nash Street and on the west by heavy industrial land uses Local jurisdictions bordering or near the site include the City of Manhattan Beach located immediately south of Rosecrans Avenue and the City of Hawthorne locate to the east of Aviation Boulevard. 4 The site is in the western portion of Continental Park Continental Park is a large office and industrial park containing approximately 2 million square feet of office, research and development, hotel, health club, restaurant, retail, and movie theater uses 5 The site is currently developed with a mixture of commercial, office, restaurant, movie theater, and parking structure uses 6 The Beach Cities Plaza currently consists of 71,792 (net) square feet of retail /office area and 10,320 square feet of indoor and outdoor restaurant area (including the proposed Taiko Restaurant) in the 2041 Rosecrans Avenue building, and 65,000 square feet of movie theater area in the 831 S Nash Street building 7 The current Zoning Code required parking for the Beach Cities Plaza includes 209 23 parking spaces for the retail /office portion, 137.60 parking spaces for the indoor and outdoor restaurant areas (including the proposed Taiko Restaurant), and 1,130 parking spaces for the Pacific Theatres building The current total Zoning Code required parking is 1490 79 spaces 8 The Final Status Report, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, dated August 2, 1999, conducted parking counts for the Beach Cities Plaza and concluded that the peak parking demand for the Precise Plan is 1,066 parking spaces on Saturday during the 9:00 p.m. peak hour. This amount is less than the 1,416 parking spaces provided for the project and less than the 1,330 parking spaces previously approved by City Council Resolution No, 4095 and predicted in Parking Demand Model in the Six Month Status Report, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan on August 26, 1997 9 The Final Status Report, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, on August 2, 1999, satisfies the traffic study requirements in City Council Resolution No. 3917 (Condition No 15), No 4034 (Condition No. 13), and No 4064 (Condition No. 3) '57 2 10 A Parking and Traffic Impact Analysts was prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, on September 27, 1999, to study the potential traffic and parking impacts from the addition of 1,300 square feet of outdoor dining area to the Beach Cities Plaza. The Analysis concluded that the proposed additional outdoor dining area would not significantly impact traffic or parking in the Precise Plan area I 1 The area surrounding the project site is highly urbanized Land uses consist of medium scale office, commercial, theater, restaurant, and retail uses The Manhattan Marketplace Retail Center and a five -story office building housing a credit union are located to the south across Rosecrans Avenue Beyond the credit union building is the Marriott Hotel with golf and tennis facilities To the southwest of the project across Rosecrans Avenue lies the Manhattan Village Shopping Center 12 The existing building, uses and development standards were approved in 1972 under a Precise Plan (PP 12 -72) as amended This project is the seventh amendment to the original Precise Plan 13 A Precise Plan is a term for a development application that is no longer used in the City for new projects A Precise Plan would now be called a Specific Plan A Precise Plan amends the zoning map by establishing permitted uses and development standards that apply only to the area covered by the plan No variances are required for Precise Plans, the approval of a Precise Plan establishes the land uses and required development standards for a project 14 The following environmental facts are established A PP 99 -1 is within the scope of the development limits established by the approval of EA -350 (PP 94 -1), which was approved with a Mitigated Negative Declaration related to environmental effects, B PP 99 -1 has no significant environmental impact, and, C PP 99 -1 is categorically exempt from further environmental analysis, pursuant to State CEQA Guideline Section 15301, as a negligible expansion of an existing use 15 The City's General Plan designates the project site for Mixed -Use development The project site is located in the Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone. The project conforms with the land uses and development standards of the General Plan and Zoning Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after considering the above facts, the testimony presented at the public hearing, and study of proposed Environmental Assessment 492 (EA -492) on PP 99 -1, the Planning Commission makes the following findings and recommends the City Council approve a Categorical exemption of environmental impacts for proposed Environmental Assessment 350 (EA -350), and adopt required findings related to the PP 99 -1 and adopt the following findings with respect to consistency of PP 99 -1 with the City of El Segundo's General Plan I C� r 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1 The Planning Commission has reviewed the applicable CEQA guidelines and determined that the proposed project qualifies as a Class 1 categorical exemption, pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA guidelines as a minor alteration of an existing structure involving negligible expansion of use beyond that previously existing 2 That when consideung the whole record, there is no evidence that the proposed modifications to the project will have the potenual foi an adverse effect on wildlife resources of the habitat on which the wildlife depends, because the project is in a built - out urban environment, and, 3 That the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council authorize and direct the Director of Planning and Building Safety to file with any appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and de mtnimts finding pursuant to AB 3158 and the California Code of Regulations Within ten (10) days of the approval of Categoucal Exemption, the applicant shall submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of $25 00 requned by the County of Los Angeles for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of Exemption As approved in AB 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA will not be met and no vesting shall occur unul this condition is met and the required notices and fees are filed with the County, PRECISE PLAN 1 That the proposed project is in accord with the purposes of the zone in which the site is located The proposed project is consistent with the intent of the Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone which allows a broad mix of uses 2 Precise Plan 12 -72, and the previous amendments, established the design of the existing facilities and the placement of essential related facilities such as parking, traffic circulation, and loading Studies prepared by the Applicant and reviewed by the City indicate that no significant increase in environmental effects will occur from the proposed amendment 3 The amendments are consistent with the purposes of a Precise Plan which, like a Specific Plan or a Planned Residential Development, provide the flexibility to allow for deviation from specific site development standards to achieve the overall design for the site GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY That the proposed amendment is consistent with the following General Plan goals, policies, and objectives A The General Plan Land Use Designation for the site, as well as the zoning, is Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) In accordance with the General Plan, the Urban 159 4 Mixed -Use South designation allows a mixture of uses including office, hotels and retail Light industrial uses are allowed with discretionary approval. B The Urban Mixed -Use South designation is designed to allow for a flexibility of uses near the three proposed and one future Green Line transit stations The MU -S designation allows an FAR of 1.3, the maximum density allowed in the area, since traffic and air quality impacts associated with higher densities can be more easily nutigated with mixed uses in close proximity to mass transit Findings must be made that the project is in conformance with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan in order to approve the protect Interpretation of conformity with the applicable provisions of the General Plan is a policy decision that is at the discretion of the Planning Commission and the City Council C The proposed project is in conformance with many General Plan goals, policies and objectives related to Economic Development, Land Use, Circulation and Air Quality The following Economic Development objectives and policies apply, ED 1 -1.1, ED 1 -1.2, ED 1 -2, ED 1 -2 1, ED 1 -2.2, and ED 1 -2.3, which relate to pnontizing economic development, diversification of an econormc base, expanding the retail and commercial base, targeting industries that balance economic development and quality of life goals, and balancing development with resource and infrastructure capacity D Many Land Use goals, policies and objectives apply including; LU 4, LU 4 -1.1, LU 4-14, LU 4 -3 1, LU 4 -3.6, LU 4-4, LU 44 3, LU 4-4.6, LU 4-4 7, LU 4.5, LU 7-12 and LU 7 -2.3 These issues relate to providing a stable tax base, providing landscaping, encouraging ground floor retail use in a mixed -use environment, providing synergistic relationships with mixed uses and ensuring a mix of uses in the Urban Mixed -Use area, encouraging alternative transportation modes, providing good accessibility to transportation routes, and requiring adequate public facilities and underground utilities E Circulation Element policies and objectives also apply to the proposal including; C 1 -1 13, C 1 -2 1, C 1 -3 2, C 2-16, C 2 -3.3, C 3 -1, C 3 -1 1, C 3 -1.2, C 3 -1.5, C 3- 1 7, and C 4-12 These policies identify the need for full examination of project traffic impacts and complete mitigation, a hierarchy and street classification system correlated to capacity and function, incorporation of off -street loading facilities, facilities designed for easy pedestrian access, pedestrian linkage to the Green Line, evaluation of circulation system impacts, full mitigation of all project- related circulation impacts, integration of transportation with land uses and surrounding environments, requiring developers to pay for mitigation measures, adequate pedestrian and bicycle access and evaluation of project impacts on CMP routes F The proposed project is located on a secondary arterial street (Nash Street) which is already substandard in lane configuration compared to the standards established in the General Plan (2 through lanes in each direction with a stripped median 160 5 instead of three lanes in each direction with a raised median) The proposed project will not impact the existing situation G The final policies and objectives which apply to the proposed project are contained within the Air Quality Element including, AQ 7 -1.1 and AQ 12 -1.2, which relate to requiring conformance with the SCAQMD PMio standards and encouraging energy conservation features in new building design NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Plammng Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of EA-492 and PP 99 -1, as follows 1 Amendment of the land uses of PP 12 -72 to increase the total amount of permitted outdoor dining area from 1,200 square feet to 2,500 square feet; and, 2. Amendment to the Site Data on "Exhibit 3 - Development Plan" of the Beach Cities Plaza Precise Plan Development Plan and Standards, as depicted in Exhibit A, to revise the required parking from 1,330 parking spaces to 1,066 parking spaces, and, to reflect the current building areas and uses within the Precise Plan area NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Environmental Assessment EA-492 and PP 99 -1, subject to the following condiuons: 1 The applicant shall indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, actions, causes of action, proceedings or suits which challenge or attack the validity of the City's approval of Environmental Assessment EA-492 and PP 99 -1 2 Outdoor dining areas in the common plaza area shall be a maximum of 2,500 square feet BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that according to the El Segundo Municipal Code, a copy of this Resolution shall be mailed to the applicant at the address shown on the application and to any other person requesting a copy of same PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of October 1999. JwTKs 4 Hansen, Int i Director of Planning and Building Safety, and, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo, California Gary Wycoff, Vice - Chairman of the Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo, California 11 •61 VOTES Crowley, (Chair) - Absent Wycoff (Vice -Chair) - Aye Boulgandes - Aye Kretzmer — Aye Mahler - Aye P \Planning & Building Safety \PROJECrS \476- 499 \Ea- 492\EA492 RES doc 162 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2455 EXHIBIT A Page 1 of ■o®wst I I: j i is e.Is• ©• WTI i M A r r i at �. .t • m'ii�i \Uulnn2\PHUJ \91035 \NA5HPLAT dwg Fri pct 08 t2 1,1 14 1000 SITE DATA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2455 RESTAURANT 137.60 SPACES EXHIBIT A Page o FUTURE OUTDOOR DINING 13.98 SPACES 1.0 LAND AREA' REOUIRED PARKING 1490.79 SPACES PARCEL 1, 871 NASH STREET). 2.753 ACRES 119,930 SF PARCEL 2 2041 ROSECRANS) 3.282 ACRES 142,970 SF TOTAL 6.035 ACRES 282,900 SF 2.0 GROSS FLOOR AREA PARKING STRUCTURE 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE 80,559 SF 871 NASH (THEATER) 85.000 SF SURFACE PARKING 47 SPACES TOTAL 145,559 SF 3.0 F A.R 0.55 TO 1 PARKING STRUCTURE 844 SPACES 4.0 PARKING A. CODE REQUIRED:* RETAIL /OFFICE 209.23 SPACES RESTAURANT 137.60 SPACES THEATER 1,130.00 SPACES FUTURE OUTDOOR DINING 13.98 SPACES TOTAL CODE REOUIRED PARKING 1490.79 SPACES S. PARKING DEMAND: *#(PEAK PERIOD) 1,086 SPACES C. PROVIDED PARKING: 831 NASH STREET SURFACE PARKING 177 SPACES 871 NASH STREET PARKING STRUCTURE HANDICAPPED * ** 10 SPACES ALL OTHERS 338 SPACES SURFACE PARKING 47 SPACES TOTAL ON —SITE PARKING 572 SPACES 870 NASH STREET JOINT USE PARKING STRUCTURE 844 SPACES TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT 1,416 SPACES # CODE REQUIRED PARKING CALCULATED BASED ON: 1) NET RETAIL /OFFICE FLOOR AREA 25,000 SO. FT. O 1 SPACE PER 300 SO. FT. - 83.33 aPACES 25.000 SO. FT. O 1 SPACE PER 350 SO. FT, - 71.42 SPACES 21.792 50. FT. O 1 SPACE PER 400 SO. FT. - 54.48 SPACES 71.792 SO. FT. 209.23 SPACES 2) NET RESTAURANT FLOOR AREA (INCLUDING E1aST. OUTDOOR DINING) 10,320 50. FT. O 1 SPACE PER 75 SQ. FT. . 137.60 SPACES 3) THEATER CAPACITY 3,391 SEATS O 1 SPACE PER 3 SEATS - 1,130.00 SPACES 4) ADDITIONAL OUTDOOR DINING 2.900 &F— DaST.(1,453 )1,047 SO. FT. O 1 SPACE PER 75 SO. FT. 13.96 SPACES TOTAL CODE REQUIRED PARKING 1,490.79 SPACES #* SOURCE: FTNAL�STATUS REPORT, BY UNSCOTT LAW do GREENSPAN, DATED AUGUST Z 1999. * ** ALL 10 GROUND FLOOR STALLS INCLUDE RELOCATION OF 8 HANDICAPPED STALLS PREVIOUSLY LOCATED IN COMMON AREA PLAZA. c R 1FQ SCRIPT FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR COUNCIL NOVEMBER 3, 1999 MAYOR: THIS IS THE TIME AND PLACE HERETO FIXED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING: On Environmental Assessment EA-492 and Precise Plan 99 -1 (Seventh Amendment to PP 12 -77) related to outdoor dining and parking Address 2041 Rosecrans Avenue, 831 -871 South Nash Street (Beach Cities Plaza) Applicant Continental Development Corporation MAYOR- CITY CLERK WAS PROPER NOTICE OF THE HEARING GIVEN IN A TIMELY MANNER? CLERK: Proper notice of the public hearing was done by the Planning & Building Safety Department MAYOR: CITY CLERK HAS ANY WRITTEN COMMUNICATION BEEN RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PUBLIC HEARING? CLERK: No written communications were received by the City Clerk's Office regarding this public hearing MAYOR: THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN, MS. STRENN WHO WILL MAKE THE PRESENTATION? After the presentation MAYOR: THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN FOR PUBLIC INPUT: After public Council discussion, and then MAYOR: MAY I PLEASE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MAYOR: CITY ATTORNEY WILL READ THE RESOLUTION BY TITLE ONLY. MAYOR: MAY I PLEASE HAVE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION W 0 -1000 VL O N PMZ 0 Vi T� C _ �L i - L e _ 5 *AV PPPMe16u/ z OF O Olego Frwy m Ssn � r m m m pnlH uogelAy E v° C: E y Q CL g PAIH ePeAIndoG S LL C cc J •• C 'r C Y k' _ •� 1 W S C _ �L i - L e _ 5 w ° ^ "go: WILD' Li 1 O -o" Lw LW ltd. ; Cy f .L L i r _ S x 1• n z S LL C �� •• C 'r C Y �_ _ •� 1 S w ° ^ "go: WILD' Li 1 O -o" Lw LW ltd. ; Cy f .L L i r _ S x 1• n W 0 -4000) 0 N �y O O O V` 1� O g:, T Z m - c, � -Qa_'��j {�t�• _' � ' .tee v 6T a 3 O E=U. a O'„+ zex /yam '�✓ A •C�% r�ir i Vier 2, -43 ri1 any pooxal6ul i San Diego Fr Y m e � i d m s PAIB = _ Uopauy = n =° d may: d 4 u' = G 06-0 PMB epan/ndag — �z • 'ter W _ � e e r _ F S7 r = TN 0 99 r" `~ o Pit f s s - c, � -Qa_'��j {�t�• _' � ' .tee v 6T a 3 O E=U. O'„+ ^ `O /yam '�✓ A •C�% r�ir i Vier 2, -43 ri1 s r = _ = n — • 'ter low 5 5. •r � -n r .. r ^ r _= 3 P o ii � = a • s t 3 0 �y = Waal • • • • ! • • TN 0 99 r" `~ o Pit f s s - c, � -Qa_'��j {�t�• _' � ' .tee v 6T a 3 O E=U. O'„+ ^ `O /yam '�✓ A •C�% r�ir i Vier 2, -43 ri1 TN 0 99 r" `~ o Pit f s s - c, � -Qa_'��j {�t�• _' � ' .tee v 6T a 3 O TN 0 99 r" `~ o Pit f s s EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL DESCRIPTION: MEETING DATE: November 3, 1999 Public Hearing on a proposed Specific Plan ( "Aviation Specific Plan "), Development Agreement, and amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Code and Zoning Map to change the existing Land Use Designation and Zoning from Open Space (O -S) to Aviation Specific Plan (ASP) Generally located at 700 South Douglas Street The Specific Plan area will be used for a public self- storage facility. The Development Agreement would provide for a road easement for the Douglas Street extension and the lease of parkland on Washington and Illinois Street (Environmental Assessment EA -427, General Plan Amendment GPA 97 -4, Zone Change 97 -3, Zone Text Amendment 98 -6, Environmental Assessment EA -470, and Development Agreement 99 -1) Property owner Southern California Edison RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION- 1 ) Open Public Hearing, 2) Continue Public Hearing until November 16, 1999, and /or, 3) Other possible action /direction INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The City Council Public Hearing was noticed and scheduled for November 3, 1999 However, there are a few provisions in the proposed Development Agreement which still require further negotiations and revisions before the City Council can take final action They are technical issues regarding the definitions and extent of the easements, details for the proposed $250,000 bond, the term of the proposed park lease, and City initiated soil testing in the road easement As a result, staff requests that this item be continued until the Council's next meeting date on November 16, 1999, in order for these negotiations to be completed A Public Hearing on this item was conducted by the Planning Commission on October 28, 1999 The Commission was made aware that there were items not related to planning or land use issues that still required additional negotiation and revisions before being considered by the City Council Staff will incorporate a summary of the Planning Commission's deliberations and actions in the City Council staff report for the continued public hearing on November 16, 1999 DISCUSSION. Briefly, the project approvals include conversion of the use of a Southern California Edison utility right -of -way from its most recent use as a landscape nursery to a self- storage facility through adoption of a Specific Plan The Aviation Specific Plan would change the General Plan Land Use Designation and Zoning Designation from Open Space to Aviation Specific Plan The proposed Aviation Specific Plan would establish new permitted uses and development standards for the project area, which would supercede the existing Open Space standards A Development Agreement would also provide for the grant of a road easement for the construction of the Douglas Street extension across the property and an offer to lease 3 66 acres of Southern California Edison land along Washington and Illinois Streets between Walnut and Holly Avenues to the City for park purposes ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None FISCAL IMPACT: None ORIGINATED: Date: October 26, 1999 ACTION p \pro1ects\426- 450 \EA- 427\EA427 & 470 ais -2 doc � f, _ 2 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 15, 1999 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Committees, Commissions & Boards AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Selection Of Downtown Events Coordinator (Fiscal Impact $20,000) RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Consider recommendation from Downtown Revitalization Subcommittee and approve contract, subject to City Attorney approval INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: On January 5, 1999, the City Council considered an Action Plan developed by staff to implement portions of the Downtown Task Force's report entitled "Developing A Vision For Downtown El Segundo" Following discussion, the City Council authorized $145,000 to implement the Action Plan including $20,000 for a Downtown Events Coordinator The purpose of this function is to provide creative, diverse and high quality programs throughout the year The events under consideration include both existing and new programs This function is intended to compliment existing events (such as the Richmond Street For, Main Street Cruise, and Holiday Parade) by coordinating new promotional programs around their existing schedules New events, such as seasonal sidewalk sales, art fairs, and musical entertainment, will be designed to attract local and nearby residents to the downtown year around This will increase the awareness level of the downtown shops and services which will directly benefit local residents, merchants and property owners Working with the events coordinator, the Task Force will develop a list of the new programs which will be reviewed and approved by the City Council DISCUSSION: An RFP was developed by the Subcommittee and circulated on March 5, 1999 Five proposals were received and all five applicants were interviewed on April 23, 1999 The Subcommittee tentatively selected Wagner Events on May 8, 1999, and staff negotiated a contract in the interim (attached) Wagner Events has extensive experience coordinating an array of events in downtown Burbank as communities in the San Francisco Bay Area They were the only applicant with experience coordinating a range of events as part of a downtown revitalization effort ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Staff Report dated January 5, 1999, Proposed Contract With Wagner Events FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: Capital Improvement Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Account Number. Project Phase: Appropriation Required: $75,000 Downtown Revitalization Budget $20,000 $20,000 Date: ORIGINATED: Date: Mary Strenn. City Manager ACTION TAKEN: 1 b5 f\ EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 3,1999 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Downtown Events Coordinator (Fiscal Impact $15,000) RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Consider recommendation from the Downtown Revitalization Subcommittee to terminate the existing contract with Wagner Events and approve a contract with The Concept Factory INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: On June 15, 1999, the City Council approved a contract with Wagner Events to provide downtown event coordination services Specifically, the intent of this program was to provide creative, diverse and high quality events throughout the year Wagner developed a list of events for the FY 1999 /2000 which were reviewed and approved by the City Council on August 17, 1999 In the interim period, Wagner Events effort did not meet the expectations of the Subcommittee who met on October 18, 1999, and recommended immediate termination of the contract DISCUSSION: In an effort to move forward with the implementation of the Downtown Events program as soon as possible, the Subcommittee has recommended retaining The Concept Factory The San Diego based firm is represented by Jennifer Fogg, a former resident of El Segundo now working out of Corona The Concept Factory placed second of five applicants interviewed on May 8, 1999, and has considerable experience staging events in Orange County The attached contract covers the balance of this fiscal year ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1 Staff report dated June 5, 1999 2 . Proposed contract with The Concept Factory FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: $20,000 Capital Improvement Budget: N/A Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: $20,000 Project/Account Balance: $16,800 Date: December 1, 1999 Account Number: N/A Project Phase: N/A Appropriation Required: N/A ORIGINATED: Date: REVIEWED c ACTION TAKEN: 166 3 m„ m > R A R pN T a > 3 N ^ 10 T o p a V ° 4^ fi$jp m N5p w > g 3bS m2 S ^ a 66 T O \ 6 ^ n>,Z mD N � 3111 �A RR 8 c O *a Of T{»$? a s N TIUM-H A.2 1MAM s:E� mc3 Nr. Ao 3 m W N ?,8 5 ^ iii Q 8 A qi w m N ° ng Q g A N i N i (J gO�pO �mp4N Z W W � m fail A A N OOOILOON p.3� 6' N O1 ml Im mV pNOfO (J OOI Li m • j • • m • • vl Vp • • fail V • N S L N S V A G a N x x S n � n a u u v p g m m > r O O >O >g >p z P A O A ygA A N R — AyDy ZyD� N Or sm w� El CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER 10/09/1999 THROUGH 10/22/1999 Date 10/13/99 10/15/99 10/18/99 10/20/99 10/20/99 10/20/99 10120199 10/21/99 Payee Amount Description Health Comp Wells Fargo IRS Employment Development Federal Reserve Bank Kansas Health Comp IRS Employment Development DATE OF RATIFICATION: 11/03/99 TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE: 79600 30,000 00 141,579 68 26,959 15 20000 843.39 109,674.33 24,125 88 334,178 43 Weekly eligible claims 10/08 Workers Comp Trf Federal Taxes PR8 State Taxes PR8 Emp Bonds PR8 Weekly eligible claims 10/15 Federal Taxes Special Settlement State Taxes Special Settlement Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by Deputy Treasurer —)-h 10 6.0 !CiA /� Date Finance Director /!�`��/ lt4 I o Date City Manager /,/,-7 g Date 334,178.43 Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of Ell Segundo IG" MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 19,1999 - 5:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Gordon at 5 00 P M PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Council Member John Games ROLL CALL Mayor Gordon - Present Mayor ProTem Jacobs - Present arrived at 5 05 p in Council Member Wemtck - Present Council Member Games - Present Council Member McDowell - Present PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalfof their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250 CLOSED SESSION: The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code §54950,1:[ =q) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator, and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation, and/or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel), and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as follows CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956 9(a)) Chaney v City of El Segundo, LASC Case No BC 207453 Stier v City of El Segundo, LASC Case No YC 034617 El Segundo v Stardust, LASC Case No YC 031364 David Venegas, et al v County of Los Angeles, et al, LASC Case No BC 207136 Hill v El Segundo, USDC Case No CV 98 -1463 In re Michael Langley, Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission No 98 -229 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956 9(b) -1- potennal cases (no further public statement is required at this time), Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code§54956 9(c) -2- matters DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) - NONE CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957 6) - NONE CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956 8) - NONE REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION - NONE ADJOURNMENT at 6 55 P M Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk 16q 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 19, 1999 - 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Gordon at 7 00 P M INVOCATION - Pastor Dennis Estill, El Segundo Foursquare Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Council Member John Gaines PRESENTATIONS - (A) Council Member McDowell presented a Proclamation to Gina Hoffman observing October 22, 23 and 24, 1999 as the Annual St. Anthony's Oktoberfest and Carnival Days in El Segundo (B) Council Member McDowell presented a Proclamation to Greg Johnson, Director of Recreation and Parks, in observance of Sunday, October 31, 1999 from 4.00 p in to 6 30 p.m as Halloween Frolic and encouraging the community to attend the festivities at El Segundo Recreation Park (C) Mayor ProTem Jacobs presented a Proclamation to Joe Harding, Rotary Club, and Gail Church, Tree Muskateers, declaring October 23, 1999 as The BEST Day in October in El Segundo and inviting citizens to Beautify El Segundo Together by raking up ice plants, weeds and trash on West Grand Avenue from Vista del Mar to Loma Vista from 9:00 a in to noon in preparation for a large tree planting and beautification project (D) Council Member Gaines presented a Proclamation to Newton Hart, El Segundo High School Principal, announcing the observance, commencing with the third Sunday in October as "El Segundo Character Counts! Week" in perpetuity and encouraging the community to embrace the Six Pillars of Character Council Member Gaines also announced the names of students receiving recognition (E) Mayor Gordon presented a Proclamation to students, John Baldwin, Melissa Monterey, and Officers John Sellens and Calvin Smith, declaring October 23 -31, 1999 as Red Ribbon week in El Segundo, encouraging all citizens to participate in drug- awareness activities, and renewing their commitment to a healthier community. Lilly Craig presented Council with red ribbon wrist bands (F) Council Member Wernick read a Proclamation to be presented to Sabrina Huertas and Cathy Svicarovich, in observance of Breast Cancer Awareness Month, inviting the community to participate in the Walk Around the World Day in El Segundo on October 31, 1999 sponsored by the World Walk Foundation for Breast Cancer MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 19, 1999 PAGE NO 1 170 ROLL CALL Mayor Gordon Present Mayor ProTem Jacobs - Present Council Member Wemick - Present Council Member Gaines - Present Council Member McDowell - Present PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $?50 Sandra Mason, resident, spoke regarding the buses that travel on Grand Avenue and turn onto Eucalyptus She feels that the buses should not be passing Recreation Park Wendy Jones, resident, spoke regarding the transfer of funds from the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Committee (ASNAC) to the LAX Master Plan Committee Frank Elroy requested the closure of Main Street between Grand Avenue and Oak Street from 5 30 p in and 6 30 p m (with "no parking" posted from 3 00 p in to 7 00 p in ) on Friday, October 22, 1999 for the El Segundo High School Homecoming Parade Janice Cruickshank, resident, spoke in favor of funding the ASNAC Liz Gamholz, resident, spoke regarding Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Committee, and statements that were made. Adrian Culls, resident, spoke regarding her displeasure with the County Animal Control services Cheryl Frick, resident, spoke regarding her displeasure with the County Animal Control services Loretta Frye, resident, spoke regarding ASNAC She also spoke regarding the people she represents, voters and employees of El Segundo, who are requesting a Wal -Mart or other such store be located in town Mayor Gordon requested a letter be sent to MTA, regarding the bus issues Regarding the ASNAC, stated he would meet with ASNAC members to discuss issues Stated that the City would be talking with Manhattan Beach regarding the Animal Control situation to see if an alternative working arrangement could be reached with them Council Member Wernick requested that the parking of buses on Grand Avenue be reviewed by the Traffic Commission MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 19, 1999 PAGE NO 2 , 1 MOVED by Council Member Wermck, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs to approve of the request for closure of Main Street between Grand Avenue and Oak Street between 5 30 p.m. and 6.30 p.m (with "no parking" posted from 3.00 p.m to 7.00 p in ) on Friday, October 22, 1999 for the El Segundo High School Homecoming Parade, MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510 A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only MOVED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, SECONDED by Council Member McDowell to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510 City Manager, Mary Strenn introduced the new Assistant City Manager, Jeff Stewart B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS - Open Public hearing on California State AB 3229 and adopt resolution accepting $36,972 95 from a block law enforcement grant and authorizing its recommended use Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a Public Hearing on California State AB 3229 and adopt a resolution accepting $36,972.95 from a block law enforcement grant and authorizing its recommended use. He asked if proper notice had been done and if any written communications had been received Clerk Mortesen stated that proper noticing had been done and no written communications had been received Police Chief, Tim Gnmmond gave a brief staff report Council consensus to close the public hearing MOVED by Council Member McDowell, SECONDED by Council Member Wernick to adopt Resolution No 4134, providing for the implementation of the Citizens Option for Public Safety (COPS) program MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510 C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 19, 1999 PAGE NO 3 1 '7 2 D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Report of Guaymas -El Segundo Sister City Association Mayor ProTem Jacobs gave a brief report She stated that a Guaymas baseball team is coming to play against an El Segundo team on Saturday, October 23, 1999 Status report of Schools subcommittee Mayor Gordon reported on a meeting with the sub - committee of the School Board and programs they wish to develop for 6th, 7th and 8th grade students He requested consensus from the Council to appoint a Education Task Force to work on this problem Council consensus 4 The El Segundo Community Cable Advisory Committee report of finding from the community cable phone survey completed in May 1999. As an adjunct to the cable report, the Committee submits its recommendations for enhancing viewership of community cable Channel 22 based on the survey findings Jeff Trujillo, and Nancy Pheifer, made a presentation Council directed staff to develop a cost analysis for Committee's recommendations E. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously If a call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business. 5. Approve Warrant Demand Registers, Warrant Numbers 2505771- 2506031 in total amount of $595,079 17 and Wire Transfers in the amount of $1,019,253.36 and authorize staff to release. Ratify: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or agreements; emergency disbursements and/or adjustments, and wire transfers from 09/25/99 to 10/08/99. 6 City Council meeting minutes of October 5, 1999 Proposal to produce monthly live interview program featuring City Council members Approve the bingo license application for St Michael's Episcopal Church, a non- profit organization located at 361 Richmond Street The proposed date for conducting a bingo game will be on October 23, 1999. ITEM REMOVED BY REQUEST OF STAFF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 19, 1999 PAGE NO 4 1 7 3 10 Request for City Council to approve the payment of a "Finder Fee" to Advanced Information Management Company to enable the City of El Segundo to hire their employee, Sabrina Hams, in the capacity of Senior Library Assistant Fiscal Impact $3,406 26 11 Request for City Council approval to initiate a Request for Proposal process (RFP) to select a third -party administrator for the City's self - insured Worker's Compensation Program 12 PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCIL MEMBER WERNICK MOVED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, SECONDED by Council Member Gaines to approve Consent Agenda items 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 11 MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA 12 Adopt Resolution No 4133 establishing a new salary range for Deputy City Treasurer and revisions to the class specification for the Job classification Fiscal Impact Funding for the new salary range is contained in the 1999 -2000 Fiscal Year Operating Budget MOVED by Council Member Wermck, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs to adopt Resolution No 4133 establishing a new salary range for Deputy City Treasurer and revisions to the class specification for the Job classification Fiscal Impact. Funding for the new salary range is contained in the 1999 -2000 Fiscal Year Operating Budget MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510 F. NEW BUSINESS - NONE G. REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - City Manager Mary Strenn announced that Sepulveda Blvd. between Rosecrans and Hughes Way will be closed from 8 P.M October 23rd through 4 P.M October 24, 1999 H. REPORTS - CITY ATTORNEY City Attorney Mark Hensley announced the following. The release of all claims made by Gregory W Ross and the City of El Segundo, Case No YC03499477, and the settlement agreement between the City of El Segundo and LA Contractors Corporation I. REPORTS - CITY CLERK - NONE J. REPORTS - CITY TREASURER - NONE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 19, 1999 PAGE NO 5 17Y K REPORTS - CITY COUNCILMEMBERS Councilmember McDowell - Commented on the ground breaking for the 911 communications center Councilmember Gaines - Reported on MagLeve transportation systems committee meeting Councilmember Wernick - Spoke regarding news racks and some of the Inappropriate free papers being distributed Requested City Manager Investigate Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs - Reported on the LAX Impact area, working with ESEA, and the Coordinators of the local Council of Governments, on short -term solutions to the airport congestion In this area Mayor Gordon - Directed the City Manager to work with Youth Counseling regarding the use of general funds with CDBG funds and develop a way to separate the two funding sources PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf ofanother, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior io addressing the City Council Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $150 Adrian Culls, resident, asked If the City plans to request a log from the County Ammal Control of all animals picked up Sandra Mason, resident, announced that on Saturday October 23, from 11 00 a in to 2 00 p in , the Joslyn Center will be having a craft sale Loretta Frye, resident, stated that a Wal -Mart type store would bring a lot of revenue Into the City Liz Gamholz, resident, announced that the Friends of the Library will have the Heritage Room open Saturday, October 23, 1999, and Thursday, October 28, 1999 Peggy Tyrrell, resident, spoke regarding the helicopters flying over the City during the recent accident at the airport MEMORIALS - Edith Wyle, wife of Wyle Lab Founder, Frank Wyle CLOSED SESSION - NONE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 19, 1999 PAGE NO 6 175 ADJOURNMENT at 9.23 P.M to November 3, 1999 at 5.00 P.M. Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 19, 1999 PAGE NO 7 176 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT DESCRIPTION: MEETING DATE: November 3, 1999 Request from Proficiency Capital Corporation to hang a temporary banner (30' x 40' - 1,200 square feet total) to announce the remodeling of the office budding at 2300 East Imperial highway (the former Pacific Bell Telephone Building) The sign, which exceeds the specifications of the Crtys Sign Code, would be located on the east side of their building, and would be in place for seven months, until May 2000 (Sign Plan 99 -23) Applicant Proficiency Capital Corporation RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve request to hang temporary announcement banner until May 31, 2000 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: On October 18, 1999, Proficiency Capital Corporation submitted a letter to the City requesting approval of a 30' x 40' (1,200 square feet) temporary announcement sign which would exceed the guidelines of the Citys Sign Code Section 20 60 08014 of the Municipal Code limits the size of temporary announcement signs to 100 square feet Such signs are permitted to be maintained from the time of budding permit issuance until the final inspection of the budding is completed Additionally, Section 20 60 080H requires that any sign over 500 square feet must be approved by the City Council As the sign is temporary and will assist the new property owners to market a building, which is undergoing extensive remodeling after a prolonged period of vacancy, staff believes that the requested banner is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Sign Code Due to the proximity of the elevated 1 -105 freeway adjacent to the building, limiting the size of the announcement sign to 100 square feet would not likely provide sufficient opportunity for an announcement sign to serve its intended purpose Additionally, the sign will require Building Safety permits to ensure that it is safely constructed and attached to the building Strength, safety, stress, and wind load analysis will be required to ensure the safety and structural integrity of the installation of the sign Standard indemnification and liability insurance will also be required ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1 Request letter from Proficiency Capital Corporation, dated October 14, 1999 2 illustration of Temporary Announcement Sign FISCAL IMPACT- None ORIGINATED: Date: October 19, 1999 Date: p tpro1ects\sp99.23 ass doc 6 177 PROFICIENCY CAPITAL CORPORATION October 14, 1999 Jim Hansen, Interim Director Department of Planning and Building Safety City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 Re: 2300 East Imperial Highway, El Segundo Request for Temporary Announcement Sign Dear Jim, Because of the dramatic repositioning of the 2300 East Imperial Highway project, I am requesting permission from the City of El Segundo to attach a temporary announcement banner on the east face of the building. This temporary banner shall be attached to scaffolding on the building and shall remain until construction is completed sometime in May of 2000. The sign will measure approximately 30 feet wide by 40 feet long and shall be attached generally as shown on the attached diagrams. I recognize that this request is subject to approval by the City Council and the issuance of a City building permit. I would greatly appreciate your assistance, Jim, in expediting the approval of this request. Sincerely yours, p � Jeffrey N. Trenton President JNT:)v attachments 178 11755 Wilshire Boulevard • Suite 2220 • Los Angeles, California 90025 ■ Phone (310) 914 -7411 • Fax (310) 268 -9188 10 -8 -99 Proficiency Capital Proposed Fabric Banner for 2300 Imperial approx 30 x 40 ft ❑ NEW iNTEmoR O NEW EXTERIOR ❑ NEW SYSTEMS �i ALL OF THE ABOVE 2300fYPERIAL Jahn Ayoub 3165162349 GiaRon Tanouary 3165152339 ooaaa m 0 X01 179 10 -8 -99 Proficiency Capital Proposed Fabric Banner for 2300 Imperial approx. 30 x 40 ft. z- .may WE;��a�� !L' \ri{ :ITOdIH jw� 180 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 2, 1999 AGENDA REM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Amendment No 1 to the City — C J Construction, Inc , annual sidewalk/curb replacement contract no 2638 providing a one (1) year extension RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1 Approve Amendment No 1 and authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment on behalf of the City 2 Authorize an allocation of $50,000 00 from unallocated Gas Tax funds for sidewalk repair work INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND. On October 6, 1998 the City Council awarded an annual contract to C J Construction, Inc , for repair of sidewalk, curb and other minor improvements The purpose of this contract was to establish unit bid prices by which damaged sidewalks and curbs can be repaired expeditiously on an as needed basis The contract permitted staff to issue purchase orders to the contractor approximately once every two (2) months to repair specific sidewalk locations and to prevent accumulating a heavy backlog of locations where work was needed DISCUSSION. The current annual contract, which expired on October 12, 1999, provides for one (1) year extension upon mutual agreement between the City and the contractor C J Construction, Inc , has performed satisfactorily during the current contract Approximately one hundred (100) sidewalk/curb locations have been repaired by means of utd¢ing the current contract C J Construction, Inc , has agreed to provide the sidewalk repair service for one (1) additional year with unit prices increased by three (3) percent to allow for inflationary changes Staff is of the opinion that lower unit prices may not be received if the project is re -bid and requests City Council approval to extend the current contract by one (1) year If the extension 1s approved, this contract will terminate on October 12, 2000 Based on prior experience, staff recommends a budget of $50,000 00 to perform the sidewalk repair work These funds were inadvertently not included in the adopted Fiscal Year 1999 -2000 budget Staff is requesting City Council allocation of this amount from unallocated Gas Tax funds to establish a budget for the sidewalk repair work ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS- Proposed Amendment No 1 City — C J Construction, Inc , Contract No 2638 FISCAL IMPACT. Operating Budget, Capital Improvement Budget, Amount Requested: ProjectlAccount Budget: Project/Account Balance: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: Date: Yes - $50.000 00 from Gas Tax revenues Date: N COUNCIUNOV02 001 (10126/99 11.00 A M ) 18 1 7 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. 2638 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE IN FIGURES 1 Remove and replace 4" thick P.0 C sidewalk $ 3.30 / SF 2 Remove and replace 6" high P.C.C. curb $ 16.48 / LF 3 Remove and replace 6" high P C.0 curb and $ 22.15 / LF 12" or 18" gutter 4 Remove existing improvements and install $808 55 / EA handicapped access ramps 5 Remove and replace 6" thick P.C.C. driveway $ 3.71 / SF 6 Install 12" root barriers $ 97911-17 7 Install 24" root barriers $ 1082/1-F 8 Remove and replace brickwork $ 7.50 / SF (minimum 10 SF location) EXHIBIT "A" N IPROJECTSWO2638 AMD (1W198) 18 G Amendment No.1 to Public Works Contract No. 2638 between the City of El Segundo (CITY) and C.J. Construction. Inc. (CONTRACTOR) The Contract is hereby extended to October 12, 2000 2 The Unit Bid Prices, as shown on Exhibit "A ", will be in effect for the extended contract 3 All other provisions of the original contract shall remain in effect CITY- CONTRACTOR: City of El Segundo a Municipal Corporation By: By:_ Mike Gordon, Mayor Print/Type Name: John Sarno Title: President Contractor's License No.: 720989 City of El Segundo Business License No.: 15186 Federal Tax Identification No.: 95- 4578126 Approved as to Form: By: 'W Ma k D. Hensley City Attorney Attest: By: Cindy Mortesen City Clerk 183 D )e4jC4 TE-: ORIGINAL CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 12th day of October, 1998 by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "CITY," and CJ Construction, Inc. hereinafter called "CONTRACTOR " CITY, by its Notice Inviting Bids, duly advertised for written bids to be submitted on or before for the following ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR P.C.C. CURB, CURB AND GUTTER SIDEWALK AND OTHER MINOR IMPROVEMENTS hereinafter called "PROJECT." At said time, In the Office of the City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, said bids were duly opened. At its regular meeting held on October 6, 1998 the City Council duly accepted the bid of CONTRACTOR for said PROJECT as being the lowest responsible bid received and directed that a written contract be entered into with CONTRACTOR NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, said parties do hereby agree as follows The Contract Documents for the PROJECT shall consist of the Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, General Specrtcations, Standard Specifications, Special Provisions, Plans, CONTRACTOR'S Proposal, and all referenced specifications, details, standard drawings, and appendices, together with this Contract and all required bonds, insurance certificates, permits, notices and affidavits, and also including any and all addenda or supplemental agreements clarifying, amending, or extending the work contemplated as may be required to insure its completion in an acceptable manner All of the rights and obligations of CITY and CONTRACTOR are fully set forth and described in the Contract Documents All of the above - mentioned documents are intended to complement the other documents so that any work called for in one, and not mentioned in the others, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if mentioned in all of said documents. The documents comprising the complete contract are hereinafter referred to as the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS and are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof as though they were fully set forth herein For and in consideration of the payments and agreements to be made and performed by CITY, CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to furnish all materials and perform all work required for the PROJECT and to full all other obligations as set forth in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS I -D-1 2CI38 19 d N 1SPECS PRJ1PWa" ID1 (10112!98) CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to receive and accept the amounts set forth in its Proposal, a copy of which is enclosed herewith, marked Erlubit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein, as fulil compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work, and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Said compensation shall cover all expenses, losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of the work during its progress or prior to its acceptance including those for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, and also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the work, suspension or discontinuance of the work, and all other unknowns or risks of any description connected with the work. ARTICLE IV CITY hereby promises and agrees to employ, and does hereby employ, CONTRACTOR to provide the materials, do the work, and fulfill the obligations according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to, for the said amounts set forth in ARTICLE III hereof, and hereby agrees to pay the same at the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions set forth in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. In addition, CONTRACTOR hereby promises and agrees to comply with a1l of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act (8 USCA 1101, gj 1M.), as amended; and, in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should CONTRACTOR so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and /or services covered by this contract, and should the Federal Government impose sanctions against the CITY for such use of unauthorized aliens, CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to, and shall, reimburse CITY for the cost of all such sanctions unposed, together with any and all costs, including attorney's fees, incurred by the CITY in connection therewith. 263 8...--1 ED- 1XW(PIA") I -D-2 I PC, ARTICLE V Contract time shall commence on the date specified in the Notice to Proceed to be Issued to said CONTRACTOR by the Department of Public Works of CITY and shall be valid upto one (1) year subsequent to this date This contract can be extended for one (1) additional year upon mutual agreement between the CITY and the CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR shall assume the defense of and indemnify and save harmless the CITY, its elective and appointive boards, officers, agents and employees, from any liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury, Including death, as well as from claims for property damage which may anse from CONTRACTOR'S or any of subcontractor's operations under this CONTRACT, whether such operations be by CONTRACTOR or subcontractor, or subcontractor's, or by any one or more persons directly or indirectly employed by, or action as agent for, CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor or subcontractors. CONTRACTOR agrees to, and shall, defend CITY and its elective and appointive boards, officers, agents and employees from any suits or actions at law or in equity for damages caused, or alleged to have been caused, by reason of any of the aforesaid operations, provided (a) That CITY does not, and shall not, waive any rights against CONTRACTOR which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreement because of the acceptance by CITY, or the deposit with CITY by CONTRACTOR, of any of the insurance policies hereinafter described In this Agreement. (b) That the aforesaid hold harmless agreement by CONTRACTOR shall apply to all damages and claims for damages or every kind suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operations of CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor, regardless of whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages. CONTRACTOR, before commencing said PROJECT, shall furnish and file with CITY a bond, or bonds, In a form satisfactory to the CITY, in the sum of one hundred percent (100 °k) of the contract price thereof conditioned upon the faithful performance of this contract and upon the payment of all labor and materials furnished in connection with this contract. N (SPECS PRJIPW98 -31D3 (6/1398) '-D-3 26 3 8 � I Rs CONTRACTOR shall not commence work under this contract until CONTRACTOR shall have obtamcd all insurance required by the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS and such insurance shall have been approved by CITY as to form, amount and carrier, nor shall CONTRACTOR allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all similar insurance required of the subcontractor shall have been so obtained and approved by the City. (a) COMPENSATION INSURANCE. CONTRACTOR shall take out and maintain, during the life of this contract, Workers' Compensation Insurance for all of CONTRACTOR'S employees employed at the site of improvement; and, if any work is sublet, CONTRACTOR shall require the subcontractor similarly to provide Workers' Compensation Insurance for all of the latter's employees, unless such employees are covered by the protection afforded by CONTRACTOR. If any class of employees engaged in work under this contract at the site of the PROJECT is not protected under any Workers' Compensation law, CONTRACTOR shall provide and shall cause each subcontractor to provide adequate insurance for the protection of employees not otherwise protected. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify CITY for any damage resulting to it from failure of either CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor to take out or maintain such insurance. Evidence of the satisfaction of this requirement shall be submitted to and approved by the City. • •• • CONTRACTOR shall take out and maintain during the life of this contract such comprehensive general liability, products/completed operations hazard, comprehensive automobile liability and contractual general liability insurance as shall protect CTTY, its elective and appointive boards, officers, agents and employees, CONTRACTOR, and any subcontractor performing work covered by this contract, from claims for damage for personal injury, including death, as well as from claims for property damage which may arise from CONTRACTOR'S or any subcontractor's operations under this contract, whether such operations be by CONTRACTOR or by any subcontractor, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by either CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor, and the amounts of such insurance shall be as follows (1) Public Liability Insurance in an amount of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS (slroOD,W); (2) Products /Completed Operations Hazard Insurance in an amount of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000); 26 38 , I -D-4 I•o-.assr(MOM IR7 (3) Comurehenslve Automobile I3abillty Insurance in an amount of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000); and, (4) Contractual General Liability Insurance in an amount of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000). A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in an amount of not less than TWO MILLION DOLLARS (52,000,000) shall be considered equivalent to the said required minimum limits set forth hercinabove. (c) PROOF OF INSURANCE. The CITY shall be named as 'additional insured' on all policies required hereunder, and CONTRACTOR shall furnish CITY, concurrently with the execution hereof, with satisfactory proof of carriage of the insurance required, and adequate legal assurance that each carrier will give CITY at least thirty (30) days' prior notice of the cancellation of any policy during the effective period of this contract, by certified or registered mail. (d) NOTICE TO COMMENCE WORK The CITY will not issue any notice authorizing CONTRACTOR to commence work under his contract until CONTRACTOR has provided to the CITY the proof of insurance as requrded by subparagraph (c) of this article. The parties agree that it would be impractical and extremely difficult to fix the actual damages to the CITY in the event the PROJECT is not commenced and /or completed on or before the dates specified for commencement and completion of the PROJECT in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The parties have considered the facts of a breach of this contract and have agreed that the liquidated damages sum hereinafter set forth is reasonable as liquidated damages in the event of a breach, and that said sum shall be presumed to be the amount of the damages sustained by the CITY in the event of such a breach. The parties therefore agree that in the event such work is not begun and/or completed and accepted by the times so specified in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, the stun of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($250.00) shall be presumed to be the amount of damages suffered by the CITY for each day's delay in the starting and/or completion and acceptance of said PROJECT after the dates specified in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS for the start and /or completion thereof, and CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to pay said sum of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($250.00) as liquidated damages for each day of delay in the starting and/or completion and acceptance of said PROJECT beyond the dates specified in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. Any and all such liquidated damages assessed shall be done so in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, 1991 Edition. I -D -S ;R6 This contract shall not be, assignable, either in whole or in part, by the CONTRACTOR without first obtaining the written consent of the CITY thereto The provisions of this Agreement are cumulative and in addition to and not in limitation of any rights or remedies available to CITY IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this contract to be executed on the date first above written by their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf CITY: City of El Segundo a Municipal Corporation Mike Gordon, Mayor • O ZI a Contractor's license No.: 4 S, '/ City of El Segundo Business license No.: ! S 1 C?6 Approved as to Form By:-' ' t Mark D. Hensley, City At e Attest: By: IaMdt 1�� Cindy Mori n, City Clerk I -D-6 MST (5+4=/98) 2638.,,. Federal Tax Identification No.: I -D-6 • e EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 3,1999 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT _ _ AGENDA HEADING: Consent AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Replacement of City Hall Pool Car, Fire Department sedan and Environmental Safety Division's Chevrolet Astro Van ( #3318) Fiscal Impact $86,184 RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve and authorize the replacement/purchase of vehicles by the Equipment Maintenance Division and that the pool car be sold at auction INTRODUCTION A D BACKGROUND: The Fire Department currently has a 1993 Ford Taurus (unit 3300) with 49,000 miles. This unit is identified for replacement in FY 99/00 and has $24,000 appropriated for replacement The Fire Department and the Equipment Maintenance Division recommend that unit 3300 should be replaced with a vehicle better suited for the Department's needs It is the recommendation of the staff that unit 3300 be replaced with a 1999 or newer Ford Crown Victoria or Mercury Grand Marquis, purchased from a rental car agency. This allows the Fire Department to purchase a vehicle that meets their goal of replacing its mid -size vehicles with full -size, emergency response capable vehicles, that better meets their needs The Environmental Safety Division's Hazmat van (unit 3318) is due for replacement in FY 00/01 It currently has $43,184 appropriated in the Equipment Replacement Fund The Fire Department recommends replacing this unit one (1) year early The van that is currently being operated no longer meets the divisions operational needs, and has served its useful life in this department The Fire Department proposes purchasing a new extended cab pick- up truck, with a utility body and a diesel engine The estimated cost for the unit is $39,000 The Fire Department and the Equipment Maintenance Division recommend transferring the current van, unit 3318, to the Government Buildings Division The van currently being used in the Government Buildings Division (unit 2115) is a 1978 Chevrolet van that has 78,000 miles The unit is in poor mechanical condition and has extensive body rust. This unit does not have any cost for replacement in the budget. The transfer of this unit would give the Government Buildings Division a newer vehicle, with fewer miles, that is in better condition to perform their job The estimated cost to recondition the van (unit 3318) for service in the Government Buildings Division is $2,500. This money will come from leftover replacement funds from unit 3318 The replacement funds from unit 3318 will be used to convert the van for use in the Government Buildings Division (Continued on next page ) DISCUSSION: By transferring vehicles as stated above, the City would benefit in the following ways. 1) purchasing a vehicle that meets the needs of the Fire Department, 2) the General Services Division meets their needs of replacing an existing unit with another van that is newer with fewer miles and is in better condition; and 3) the Environmental Safety Division gains a vehicle that better meets their needs of operation Continued on next Daoe. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget: X Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: $86.184 Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number: 601 -400- 3205 -8105 $43,81413201 - 524.0001 2901- S19,01M Project Phase: ^MI^ILIAu ,. .11 • Page 2 Consent Agenda 11/03/99 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: (Continued from Page 1) The Non - Department Division "Pool Car' (Unit 1116) is a 1991 Ford Taurus with 108,000 miles This unit is identified in the budget and was to be replaced in FY 97/98 This unit was held over for service for two (2) additional years This unit was transferred from the Fire Department in 1997 The unit has experienced major mechanical repairs, and the body is in poor condition and is in need of a paint job. It is the staff's recommendation that this unit be replaced with a Ford Crown Victoria purchased from a car rental agency This would be a full -size vehicle that would better meet the needs of all divisions and departments that use it DISCUSSION: (Continued from Page 1) Staff recommends the purchase of two vehicles from a rental car agency and one new crew cab pick -up truck, and that the pool car be sold at auction The criteria for the two rental cars are as follows. 1) Prices are lower than that of new vehicles. 2) Vehicles carry a full manufacturers warranty 3) Vehicles will still have monetary value at the end of 3-6 years All vehicles authorized as outlined above would be fully inspected and have their service records reviewed by the Equipment Maintenance Division prior to the final purchase. Craig Pedego and John Gilbert from the Fire Department, and Roger Groman and Rick Longobart from the Equipment Maintenance Division have been consulted and are supportive of such a purchase. The Equipment Maintenance Division will supply vehicle specifications upon approval of this request 191 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 3 November 1999 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Approve conclusion of Phase 5 of the El Segundo Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve, receive and file the final report of Phase 5 of the El Segundo Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The FAA has approved the work performed in Phase 5 of the El Segundo Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program A small percent of the 370 rooms surveyed measured slightly higher than the goal level of 45dB Typically this was because the homeowner established constraints that prevented full RSI treatment The FAA approved these exceptions on a case by case basis Please refer to the attached supporting Documents for Phase 5 program details DISCUSSION. None ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1 Data Sheet for El Segundo's Residential Sound insulation Program, Phase 5 2 Wyle Research Report, WR 99 -08, Noise Survey on El Segundo Residential Sound Insulation Program, (Phase 5), with Revised Data summary FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget: Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget, Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number. Project Phase: Appropriation Required - Yes_ No X ORIGINATED: Date: 22 October 1999 Harvey Holden. Special Projects Administrator REVIEWED BY: Date: 22 October 1999 BY c \isi \Phases \Council \PHSCJoseout agn 1099 doc Date: /tr7 192 9 DATA SHEET FOR EL SEGUNDO'S RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM PHASE 5 Protect Chronoloey: 02 September 1997 Council approves Phase 5 Plans and Specifications, Bid and Contract Documents 06 November 1997 Council awards general construction and supply contracts 03 March 1998 Council expands eligibility among CDBG candidates for the RSI Program 13 July 1998 Phase 5 construction begins 31 December 1998 Phase 5 construction completed June 1999 Phase 5 post - construction Noise Survey on El Segundo's Sound Insulation 3 Total value of construction contracts Program completed 18 June 1999 Final reimbursement request submitted to the FAA for Phase 5, with a copy of the + 483.999 00 Noise Survey on El Segundo's Sound Insulation Program (Phase 5) 30 September 1999 FAA approval of Phase 5 and $1,000,000 grant for Phase 7 provided 03 November 1999 Final report on Phase 5 submitted to Council to receive and file Phase 5 Cost Data: 1 Six general construction contracts were awarded to Golden Bear Construction valued at a total of $1,162,340 00 2 One general construction contract was awarded to T &M Construction valued at + 202.095 00 3 Total value of construction contracts $1,364,435 00 4 One window supply contract was awarded to Peerless Products Inc valued at + 483.999 00 5 Total construction contract cost $1,848,434 00 6 General construction change orders totaled $ 63,691 00 7 Window supply change orders totaled + 15.017 00 8 Total cost of change orders $ 78,708 00 9 Consultant cost $ 256,026 00 10 City's Project Management cost + 106.003 00 11 Total project management and administrative cost $ 362,02900 12 Total Cost of Phase 5: 52,289,171.00 13 Management and administration cost as a percent of total project cost 158% 14 Change orders as a percentage of total project cost 34% 15 Average cost per Single Family Home $ 34,482 00 16 Average cost per Multi- family Home $ 21,329 00 17 Least total amount spent on a Phase 5 home $ 17,095 00 18 Largest total amount spent on a Phase 5 home $ 56,626 00 Phase 5 Cost Analysis: A recent review of RSI projects at MasspoM San Jose, San Diego, Cleveland, Baton Rouge, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Ontario indicates the following 1 Construction costs per unit vary radically across the country 2 Management and administrative costs tend to be approximately 15 to 20% of the total cost of the projects with a few being higher than 20% 3 Change order costs tend to be 3 to 7 %, with first time project change order costs frequently being higher 4 The cost for consultant services tends to run from $6,000 to $12,000 per unit, depending upon the scope of work While there are a few projects which have per unit costs between $3,500 and $4,500, those projects generally have 350 - 500 participating dwellings, not the low, 71 units of Phase 5 Summation: 1 All but 3 rooms met FAA acoustical requirements and all contractual goals were met All three rooms which failed were within 2.5dB of the FAA's 45dB goal The exceedences were not corrected at the request of the homeowners and with the approval of the FAA 2 The responses to the Homeowner's Satisfaction Survey showed an average of over 95% indicating an unproved quality of life, and 100% recommending RSI treatment to their neighbors c \m\Phase5\ inaI\Rpt2Coune l 1099 ATTACHMENT ( 1 ) 1 9 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents post - modification noise reduction values for 71 dwellings in the City of El Segundo which have been sound - insulated using Federal Aviation Administration funding under AIP Project Numbers 3 -06- 0139 -NC, N8, and NE. The noise study shows that all but the two of the 71 treated dwellings meet the project goal of achieving an interior CNEL of 45 dB or less The exceptions include one dwelling where the owner declined to have windows replaced (but accepted door, attic, and ventilation improvements) and one dwelling where the upper floors are unfurnished, unoccupied, uncarpeted, acoustically reverberant, and not currently representative of a habitable space On a room -by -room basis, exclusive of the above two dwellings, more than 91% of the 370 surveyed rooms meet the 45 dB CNEL goal. The exceptions are typically kitchens or adjacent dining rooms which cannot be fully treated due to fixtures or hard (reflective) floor and wall surfaces Other exceptions are within 1.5 dB of the goal and within the bounds of measurement and design tolerances or are under further examination to determine the cause. wve U tabaatari" tq4 wyle September 15, 1999 Mr. Harvey G. Holden Airport Projects Administrator City of El Segundo 350 Main St. El Segundo, CA 90245 Reference: Wyle Report WR 99 -08, Revised Data Dear Harvey J/N 10055.56 We have conducted additional noise measurements for some rooms to the Phase 5 Sound Insulation Program in order to determine why a few of them exceeded the CNEL 45 dB goal. The new data is a significant improvement and supports the contention that an anomaly caused the problems We have attached the measurement data sheets as a backup for your records. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, WYLE LABORATORIES, INC. Wyle Research ohn Kaytor J Architect JK/rg 195 WYLE RESEARCH 128 Maryland Sbvea Ell Segundo, CaRtomia 90245 -4100 Telephone (310) 322 -1783 FAX (310) 32219799 CNEL from Revised WR 99 -08 CNEL Address Room (dB) (dB) 205 W Acacia Living 50.8 31.9 1010E. Acacia Bed 2 48.9 33.0 645 Sierra Living 47.8 38.4 Dining 48.5 37.7 We have attached the measurement data sheets as a backup for your records. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, WYLE LABORATORIES, INC. Wyle Research ohn Kaytor J Architect JK/rg 195 WYLE RESEARCH 128 Maryland Sbvea Ell Segundo, CaRtomia 90245 -4100 Telephone (310) 322 -1783 FAX (310) 32219799 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE- November 3, 1999 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING. Consent Calendar AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Request to submit purchase orders to encumber funds for Library materials through various accounts with Baker and Taylor Information Services for the period October 1, 1999- September 30, 2000. Fiscal Impact : $82,500 (Appropriated under FY 1999/2000 Budget Library Accounts- 6104 5501/5502/5505/ /5507 Total appropriated in those accounts: $183,800) RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION. Approve a purchase order to encumber funds with the Library's primary book vendor, Baker & Taylor Information Services, for the term October 1, 1999- September 30, 2000 in the amount of $82,500 to cover the costs of Library books, Reference sources, and audio /visual materials. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND. For many years Baker & Taylor Information Services has been the Library's primary vendor for ordering books and other popular material items Their automated ordering service annually supplies the Library with over 45% of its total funding for new and replacement materials in the collection areas of Adult and Children's books, Best - sellers, Reference Collection titles, videos, music cassettes & CD's, books -on -tape, paperbacks, and other non - printed items Baker & Taylor has had an excellent track record in delivering materials in a timely manner and they offer one of the best discounts of up to 30% on most items. DISCUSSION: The City's Municipal Code requires Council approval for releasing funds to one vendor which goes over the $10,000 limit. Staff is requesting appropriations for blanket purchase orders to Baker & Taylor for the following amounts in each of the 6104 accounts 6104 -5501 (Adult & Reference Book Accounts) $41,000 6104 -5502 (Audio /Visual) $18,000 6104 -5505 (Young People's Books) $15,000 6104 -5507 (School Library Materials) $ 8.500 TOTAL: $82,500 ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS- None FISCAL IMPACT- (Check one) Operating Budget: X Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: $84,000 Account Number: 6104: 5501 :5502:5505:5506 :5507 Appropriation Required - Yes No x ORIGINATED: Date: October 22, 1999 t7/t &t,- Date 196 10 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 3, 1999 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING. Consent Calendar AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Request to submit a purchase order to encumber funds for Library online cataloging with OCLC Pacific Network for the period October 1, 1999 - September 30, 2000 Fiscal Impact • $18,000. (Appropriated under FY 1999/2000 Library Account 6102 -6214 Total allocated $22,000) RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Approve a purchase order to encumber funds to the Library's primary online cataloging service, OCLC Pacific Network, for the term October 1, 1999- September 30, 2000 in the amount of $18,000 to cover the costs of cataloging all Library materials including books, periodicals, Reference sources, videos, music CD's and cassettes, books -on -tape, paperbacks, and school library items INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: OCLC Pacific Network has been the Library's online cataloging service for processing books and other popular materials items Their automated cataloging service provides the Library with professional cataloging and processing for new and replacement copies of materials for all collections of the Main and School Libraries Last year, the cataloging division processed over 15,000 books, 1,200 A/V materials, 3,000 periodicals, and 800 paperbacks This cataloging service is vital to Library operations and it is recommended by staff to approve this request DISCUSSION- The City's Municipal Code requires Council approval for releasing funds to one vendor which goes over the $10,000 limit Staff is requesting appropriations for $18,000 to OCLC Pacific Network out of Account 6102- 6214 which has a total budgeted amount of $22,000 for cataloging and processing ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None FISCAL IMPACT. (Check one) Operating Budget: X Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: $18.000 Account Number: 6102 -6214 Appropriation Required - Yes-No-.x_ ORIGINATED. Date: October 22, 1999 &kUhMy Debra Brighton, Library Director REVIEWED BY: Date GAFORM EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 3, 1999 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar AGENDA DESCRIPTION: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of El Segundo, California establishing new salary ranges for the job classifications of Supervising Communications Dispatcher, Communications Dispatcher I and Communications Dispatcher II and an Examination Plan for those Personnel Merit System job classifications, Fiscal Impact None Funding for the new salary ranges is contained in the 1999 -2000 Fiscal Year Operating Budget Adopt Resolution and approve the Examination Plan INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The 1999 -2000 Fiscal Year Operating Budget, adopted by the City Council on September 21, 1999, included a 5% increase in the existing salary ranges for the job classifications of Supervising Communications Dispatcher, Communications Dispatcher] and Communications Dispatcher II Groundbreaking for the construction of the Public Safety Communications Center occurred on October 19, 1999, and the Police Department is interested in filling the positions quickly in order to staff the facility properly upon completion of the project Accordingly, the Human Resources Department seeks to begin the recruitment, testing and selection process immediately to fill the three (3) essential Supervising Communications Dispatcher positions Adjustment of the salary ranges will insure that the City will be able to attract and retain highly qualified individuals Chapter 2 28 080 of the El Segundo Municipal Code, entitled "Administration and Personnel," provides that the Personnel Officer shall review and recommend to the City Manager, who in turn shall recommend to the City Council, an appropriate examination plan and weights for each portion of the examination for Personnel Merit System job classifications Please refer to the attachment for the specific proposed examination plan DISCUSSION: The City Council is required to adopt the attached Resolution establishing new salary ranges and approve the Examination Plan outlined in the Attachment before the Human Resources Department can begin its advertising and recruiting efforts ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: A Resolution establishing salary ranges for the job classifications of Supervising Communications Dispatcher, Communications Dispatcher 1 and Communications Dispatcher 11, and an Examination Plan for the recruitment for those positions FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget: X Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested* Project/Account Bu ge - ProjecNAccount Balance a e: Account Number: Project Phase: agm" 331 ,q$ 12 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING SALARY RANGES FOR THE JOB CLASSIFICATIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS DISPATCHER I, COMMUNICATIONS DISPATCHER 11 AND SUPERVISING COMMUNICATIONS DISPATCHER The City Council of the City of El Segundo does hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows Section 1 That the City Council approves the following basic monthly salary ranges for the lob classifications of Communications Dispatcher 1, Communications Dispatcher II and Supervising Communications Dispatcher SALARY RANGE # TS EPA STEP B TS EP C STEP D STEP Communications Dispatcher 1 41 270587 2841 16 2983.22 313238 328900 Communications Dispatcher If 51 298240 313152 328810 345250 362513 Supervising Communications 61 328726 3451 63 362421 380542 399569 Dispatcher Section 2 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said City, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of November 1999 Mike Gordon, Mayor of the City of El Segundo, California ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 3rd day of November 1999, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APP OVED AS TO FORM: ark Hence , 'ty Attor ?Q9 Examination Plan for the following job classifications: Supervising Communications Dispatcher (Open - Promotional) Communications Dispatcher I (Open - Promotional) Communications Dispatcher II (Open - Promotional) The examination will consist of: Written, Multiple Choice Examination (Pass /Fail) Structured Technical /Career Preparation Interview Weighted 100% 2Pn EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT MEETING DATE November 3, 1999 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar Examination plan for the Personnel Merit System lob classification of Water Maintenance Leadworker RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve the Examination Plan INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Chapter 2 28 080 of the El Segundo Municipal Code, entitled "Administration and Personnel', provides that the Personnel Officer shall review and recommend to the City Manager, who in turn shall recommend to the City Council, an appropriate examination plan and weights for each portion of the examination for Personnel Merit System lob classifications DISCUSSION: -REFER TO ATTACHMENT- ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: FISCAL IMPACT (Check one) Operating Budget: Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required - Yes_ No_ sg�& 3W 13 -330 -i The Human Resources Department has initiated the recruitment, testing and selection process for the job classification of Water Maintenance Leadworker and has posted the notice of the examinations in accordance with the City's Municipal Code and the City's Personnel Rules and Regulations It is recommended that the City Council approve the examination plan that contains the following examination techniques and weights for each portion of the examination Water Maintenance Leadworker (Closed - Promotional) Structured Technical /Career Preparation Interview Weighted 100% �, r` EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 3 November 1999 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: New Business, City Manager AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Approval of plan for Phase 6 and award of contract for acoustic, architectural, and engineering consultant services for the City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Phase 6 plan and award of Consultant contract to Wyle Laboratories Inc INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: In accordance with Federal Aviation Administration and Community Development Block Grant guidance, staff has developed a plan for Phase 6 and solicited a firm capable of providing acoustic, architectural, and engineering consultant services in support of the City's RSI program A Notice Inviting Proposals was sent to 15 firms and placed in the local paper for two weeks on 1 September Twc firms responded with proposals They were Wyle Laboratories, Inc, and Jones Payne Architects and Planners, Inc Staff reviewed the proposals, including work history, and inquiries were made of references provided Both companies were found to be very capable of developing plans, specifications, architectural drawings and details, schedules, and reports However, Wyle has considerably more field operations management experience DISCUSSION: On 30 September staff met with representatives of Wyle to determine whether Wyle's Labor and Materials price would be acceptable to the City The final proposal from Wyle of $58,400, or about $4,492 31 per dwelling, is considered quite reasonable given the cost of similar services to other communities A review of RSI projects at Massport, San Jose, San Diego, Cleveland, Baton Rouge, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Ontario indicates that the cost for consultant services tends to run from $6,000 to $12,000 per unit, depending upon the scope of work While there are a few projects which have per unit costs between $3,500 and $4,500, those projects generally have 350 - 500 participating dwellings Phase 6 has 13 dwellings The contract proposed is for one year with two one -year options (The options are requested because the City will likely use Wyle Labs' services for Phase 7, which was funded 30 September 1999, with a $1 million grant from the FAA ) Phase 7 participant identification begins on 15 November 1999 ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1 Proposed Contract (Contains Phase 6 description including homes to be insulated in Exhibit "A") 2 Summary of the Review and Scoring of Consultant Proposals 3 List of Companies Contacted 4 Residential Sound Insulation Program of Ell Segundo, Phase 6, Packet FISCAL IMPACT (Check one) Operating Budget: X Capital improv. Budget: Amount Reauested: 510.000 ProlectlAccount Budget- $50.000 FY199912000 budget Project/Account Balance: $50.000 Date: 1 October 1999 Account Number. 116400. 0000.6214 Project Phase: Phase 6 Appropriation Required - Yes X No ORIGINATEVV � Date: 19 October 1999 Harvev HoldenHolden. Soec�al Protects Administ�torPro�ects Administ�tor REVIEWED BY: Date: 20 October 1999 BY. ACTION T c \rsi \Phase6 \Ph6- Contract \wylecontract agn 1099.doc Date: 14 AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES City of El Segundo and Wyle Laboratories, Inc. (October 1999) THIS AGREEMENT, ( "Agreement ") made and entered into by and among the City of EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation, (hereafter "City" or "Sponsor ") and WYLE LABORATORIES, INC a California corporation (hereafter "Wyle" or "Consultant ") The parties hereby agree as follows- SECTION 1. RECITALS. This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the following facts A That the City of El Segundo is desirous of obtaining the services of a qualified consultant to provide acoustical consulting, architectural design, engineering and administrative services for Phase 6 and possible follow -on phases of the City's multi- phased Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program, and B That Phase 6 is funded jointly by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds CDBG funds are provided by the Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) As such, Phase 6 is subject to all applicable FAA and HUD regulations, and C That Consultant is well versed in the applicable FAA and HUD regulations, and D That the number of homes participating in Phase 6 will be contingent upon availability of grant monies, available program volunteers, and engineering cost estimates for candidate residences, and E That the City may extend this Agreement from year to year, not to exceed three years from the date of execution of this Agreement, and F That the City has sought and considered proposals by various persons to perform the desired services, and G That Consultant has been selected by the City as the most qualified to provide the desired services and the Consultant has agreed to perform those services, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, and H That the legislative body of the City has determined that the public interest, convenience and necessity require the execution of this Agreement SECTION Z. SCOPE OF WORK, The Scope of Work is indicated below. This list is not inclusive of requirements based on unforeseeable program changes initiated by the City Under the direction of the Project Manager (PM) the Consultant will be required to perform all work reasonably necessary and required in order to provide all the services ( "Services ") to the City, as described below A Reports and Documents. Consultant will prepare relevant documents that may include, but are not limited to the following- 204 Standard Project Specifications and Details, Plans and Modification Requirements, Instructions to Construction and Supply Bidders and Bid Forms per FAA and CDBG requirements, 4 Pre- Construction and Post Construction Noise Surveys of the participating dwellings in El Segundo's Residential Sound Insulation Program, Phase 6, 5 Technical responses to Requests For Information from Contractors & Suppliers, 6 Weekly work progress reports, 7 Technical assistance in writing specifications for windows, doors and other appurtenances, Consolidated lists of widows and doors showing quantities and specifications, and, Such other documents as may be necessary for the efficient operation of Phase 6 including, but not limited to, reports required by the FAA and CDBG regulations, the City Council or other appropriate agencies. B Federal Program Compliance. Consultant shall ensure that the project remains in complete compliance with applicable federal and state guidelines. This shall include, but not be limited to, a review and annual update of the project's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program (DBE) through the life of the program to ensure it complies with FAA guidelines (Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 23) and CDBG regulations C Development of Designn Criteria. Installation of acoustic treatments shall be in accordance with the Wyle's Design Guide for Residential Sound Insulation Prorects in the Vicinity ofLADOA Airports, published in September, 1991, by the LADOA, and as modified by Wyle. The Consultant shall make recommendations to the PM for improvements in materials used and construction methods as they are developed during the implementation of RSI programs It is a requirement of this project to achieve compliance with FAA's 45dB CNEL interior residential noise standard, described in Section 18 of this Agreement, while maximizing cost effectiveness. Deviations from the Design Guide must be approved by the PM D Protect Overview. The Phase 6 project anticipates providing noise insulation for approximately 7 Single Family Dwellings (SFDs) and 6 Multi- Family Dwellings (MFDs), described in Exhibit "A ", titled, "Phase 6 Dwellings" The number of dwellings actually insulated will be contingent-upon the number of residents who accept full participation in the program, bid amounts for the construction contracts, and available funding The Phase 7 project has been funded by the FAA in the amount of $ 1,000,000 It is anticipated that Phase 7 will involve the insulation of approximately 40 homes. If both the City and Wyle reach agreement on consultant costs, the City may extend this Agreement to include Phase 7 E Protect Administration. Consultant shall maintain appropriate records of all program documents that become available to it, including a document record for each program participant which includes copies of all program related correspondence to or from the homeowner, copies of all plans and 205 specifications, copies of any and all agreements, a copy of the punch list, surveys, reports, and any other documents relevant to each dwelling. Copies of all internal and external reports on the project, its status and its completion, shall be maintained. Copies of all correspondence with governmental agencies, suppliers, general contractors and others shall be maintained. F Phase 6 Plan Development. The PM has developed a Phase 6 Construction Schedule, Exhibit "F ", "Work Schedule for Phase 6 ", including a time line of milestones against which the progress of the Phase will be measured As the technical manager for the project, the Consultant shall be held responsible for ensuring Consultant's critical program paths remain on schedule G Program Initiation. Consultant shall provide the PM requested data related to the development of supply contracts In order to maintain consistent quality and provide for cost control the City will contract for window and door supplier services rather than depending upon the general contractor for those services Quality control shall be provided by Consultant through the establishment of window, door, and other product specifications and spot checks made upon receipt of the products Following the award of contracts for Phase 6, the Suppliers and General Contractor will participate in a planning meeting wherein material ordering procedures are reviewed Window and door suppliers shall be required to take the measurements from which the retrofit products are designed, and are responsible for training the General Contractor's installation team The procedures for changing orders will also be reviewed Production and shipping times, and other pertinent data will also be provided. The Phase 6 RSI Plan will be formalized and presented for approval to the City Council after all appropriate architectural and acoustic measurements, and structural evaluations have been completed by the Consultant, after individual RSI plans have been presented to prospective Phase 6 program participants, and, after the Homeowner's Permission to Proceed Form has been received from each of the participants. H Acoustic Measurements. Consultant shall conduct acoustic measurements of all dwelling units listed in Exhibit "A ", for possible program participation. An evaluation of 100 percent of the habitable rooms of the dwellings selected for program participation shall include acoustic measurements before and after insulation treatment The complete set of pre- and post- construction measured noise data for Phase 6 dwellings will be organized and presented in a format acceptable to the PM within 45 days of completion of construction of Phase 6 I Physical Condition Evaluation. Consultant shall conduct physical condition evaluations for each dwelling unit, designated for possible program participation The purpose of this inspection is to ensure, to the extent that an inspection of the visible condition of the structure allows, that 100 percent of all dwellings that are approved for program participation are structurally sound and fully capable of accommodating the necessary acoustic treatment. The purpose of ims effort is to preclude discovery of significant structural shortcomings such as termites, dry rot, unsafe deviation from uniform building code construction requirements, water damage, and/or structural design that will not readily accommodate RSI treatment after commencement of RSI treatment J Physical Measurements. Consultant shall take measurements of each participating home to provide accurate layout drawings These drawings will be used in conjunction with the plans and specifications to guide the Contractor in making the required RSI improvements K Materials List Consultant shall develop lists of project materials showing specifications and quantities for each home and such consolidated lists as necessary to develop supplier bid documents L Dwelling Selection. Consultant shall make recommendations for inclusion or exclusion of each residence considered for participation in Phase 6, based on the physical condition and code compliance of the dwelling Homes may be excluded from participation because of significant structural problems, or Consultant's belief that such problems may exist Engineering analysis is not required to support 206 Consultant's belief unless specifically requested by the City Homes may be excluded because of mayor Code violations such as the existence of unpermitted residential units on a parcel. Building Code violations are to be brought to the attention of the PM for resolution Typically, the homeowner will be informed that such violations must be corrected prior to participation If the homeowner complies in a timely manner, then participation can occur. M RSI Cost Estimate. For each dwelling approved for participation, Consultant shall provide an estimated construction cost for RSI treatment Once Consultant has created plans for each prospective program participant, Consultant shall, with the PM, present those plans to the program participants at in- home briefings With the PM, Consultant will explain in detail what acoustical modifications are planned Consultant shall record these in -home briefings in writing, noting any issues raised by a prospective program participant and relay those issues with recommendations to the PM for consider- ation and action If the PM is unavailable, Consultant shall conduct the in -home RSI plan briefings At the briefing the homeowner will receive the Homeowner's Permission to Proceed Authorization (Homeowner's Authorization) After the RSI plans have been presented, the PM and/or Consultant will assist the homeowners with answers to any questions they may have about the Plan or the Homeowner's Authorization The Homeowner's Permission to Proceed Authorization Form must be completed at the in-home meeting The original of each Authorization shall be retained by the PM Consultant and the homeowner shall receive copies N Selection of Suppliers. Consultant shall develop specifications for materials and for selection criteria for suppliers O Development of Bid Packages. Consultant shall assist the PM in preparing the supplier bid package(s) and draft agreements, construction documents and bid package material, including plans and specifications (hereafter referred to as the "Bid Package ") , for approval by the PM Bid Packages shall be organized so that there is an overall Window Supply bid package, an overall Door Supply bid package, and an overall Construction bid package. Each bid package shall require submittal of a schedule of values for each door, or window to be provided by the suppliers, and a schedule of values for the construction work to be provided. See Exhibit "G ". Bid Package materials shall contain sufficient detail to allow the Contractor or Supplier to meet or exceed the product quality and workmanship standards needed to achieve the technical requirements of the project. They will include all architectural, structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering work requirements The documents contained in the Bid Packages shall be similar to those prepared for previous phases of the City's RSI program. P FAA Approvals. The plans and specifications, and selection of Contractors and Suppliers, once approved by the City, shall be submitted to the FAA for approval Consultant shall make any FAA requested modifications to plans and specifications as directed by the PM Q Bidder Conference. Consultant shall assist the PM in conducting the bidder's conference, site visit(s), and related tasks, for suppliers and contractors. Consultant shall ensure that prospective contrac- tors are aware of the technical requirements of the plans and specifications, and the quality of workman- ship required in this sound insulation project R Bidder Reference Checks. Consultant shall participate in the contractor selection process as directed by the PM, participating in the Selection Board, and conducting bidder background/reference checks The CDBG Consultant shall assist in obtaining clearance from the Community Development Commission for the contractor and assuring the contractor is not on HUD's debarred list. S Bidder Selection. Consultant shall make recommendations to the PM regarding the eligibility of bidders based on their compliance with the bid documents and their qualifications The qualified bidders with the lowest bid for construction or supply for Phase 6 shall be recommended to City Council 2 07 for award of contracts Upon approval of the general contractor by the City, project construction costs will be reviewed in light of the winning bids and budget/program changes made where necessary by the PM, and T Contractor Training. Consultant shall conduct acoustical construction teaming and sight/project familiarization training with all contractors selected to assure. understanding of the project goals, objectives, policies and procedures, knowledge of all applicable construction techniques, and familiarity with all matenals to be used and participants to be served The Consultant shall also ensure that all contractors are aware of the City's requirements for building permits and business licenses U Construction Oversight. Consultant shall be responsible for oversight of all aspects of the con- struction project that relate to the sound insulation measures being incorporated into the dwellings Through daily field inspections, the Consultant shall ensure day - to-day contractor compliance with the architectural plans and specifications throughout the course of construction. There may be a need for more than one daily inspection. The frequency of inspections will be determined by the PM Additionally, the Consultant shall be responsible for maintaining positive homeowner /contractor rela- tions and provide recommendations for program improvement Unless otherwise directed by the PM, the tasks involved in construction oversight include, but are not limited to, the following 1 Generate, review, and/or process all submittals and shop drawings, or requests for drawings submitted by the contractor and approved by the PM 2 Inspect all materials before they are installed to ensure that they comply with approved submittals 3 Inspect all work to ensure that it complies with approved shop drawings and permits. 4 Observe all work in progress to verify that it meets the requirements and intent of the contract documents 5 Issue a report to the contractor(s), in writing, of any part of the work in progress that does not conform to approved submittals, shop drawings, permits, or contract documents. 6 Prepare and issue to the contractor(s) any clarification or interpretation of the contract documents 7 Consider, evaluate and present recommendations to the PM, the contractor's suggestions for modifications to the contract documents 8 Take pictures, either photographic or digital, of participating dwellings before work begins, while the work is in progress, and upon completion of the project. As a minimum, a before -and- after, curbside, approximately 8 x 10 inch picture shall be taken from the same viewpoint of every home in Phase 6. Photos shall also be taken of unusual architectural features, representative workmanship (good and bad), and representative, sub - standard, pre- construction conditions, particularly damage around existing windows These latter photos should be of sufficient size to show clearly the details of interest. The photos shall be collected in an album and presented to the PM at the conclusion of the project. A collection of 2 to 6 photos per home is anticipated 9 Maintain files and records of all pertinent documents including submittals, shop drawings, addenda, minutes of meetings, and reports that are received or produced m the normal course of program business 206 10 Prepare detailed weekly work progress reports for the PM I 1 Along with the CDBG Consultant, review contractor payroll reports and applications for payment to ensure they agree with required wage rates, the work actually done and materials actually received Because this project includes the use of federal funds, Davis -Bacon requirements will be in effect (i.e prevailing wages must be paid to all employees working on thejob) 12 Prepare punch lists at the appropriate time for each unit Distribute the lists to the appropriate contractors to carry out the work Upon notification by the contractors verify that punch list items were completed 13 Visually inspect each unit before expiration of the guarantee /warranty period and issue a report describing all elements that are found to be in non - conformance, the reasons for their non- conformance, and a determination of the causes V Supply Line Ouably Assurance. The PM shall monitor production schedules for specified materials, ensuring timely receipt of those materials by the contractors Consultant shall keep the PM apprised of any known material problems W Meetings. Consultant shall participate in meetings with the FAA, City Council, City Staff, CDBG Consultant, homeowners and contractors as directed by the PM, providing appropriate technical expertise and guidance X Report . Consultant shall create a tickler system to ensure that all FAA required reports are submitted on time The Consultant shall generate all drafts project records required by the FAA unless otherwise directed by the PM These project records will all conform to FAA Advisory Circular AC 150 -5110 - Account Records for AIP Projects. Consultant shall thoroughly document progress and results of the project through weekly work progress reports including a final comprehensive report. Format for all non -FAA required reports must be approved by the PM Y Public Relations. Consultant must respond to all participant concerns and punch list items in a vigorous, concerned and conscientious manner, making every effort to achieve complete and timely Phase 6 participant satisfaction. Z Work Schedule. Consultant agrees to complete all Services described herein in accordance with Exhibit "F ", titled, " Work Schedule for Phase 6 "This schedule of work is supplemented by the "Summary Work Statement" attached here as Exhibit "B ". All aforementioned Exhibits and Wyle's Proposal of 23 September, 1999, are incorporated herein by this reference All Work to be provided hereunder shall be performed in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and any amendments thereto 20� SECTION 3. COMPENSATION. City agrees to compensate Consultant for its services in support of Phase 6 in the amounts set forth in the schedules contained in Exhibits C, D, E and H, which are incorporated herein by this reference. As this is a Time and Material agreement, the total cost for Consultant services is estimated at $58,400 As the City's RSI program is a multi- phased project, and this Agreement has two one -year extension options, extension of this Agreement is possible upon mutual acceptance of values for Time and Material SECTION 4. TIME OF PAYMENT. The Consultant shall submit monthly invoices for services rendered The invoice will be accompanied by a labor accounting table in the format of Exhibit "H", "Consultant Invoice & Accounting Table" All invoices will either be approved or returned to the Consultant for correction The City shall pay 90% of the amount of the invoice, except the final invoice, within thirty (30) days following approval of each invoice by the City The 10% reta rage shall be included in the final invoice and paid upon satisfactory completion of all the Services required under this Agreement SECTION 5. SCHEDULE FOR RENDERING SERVICES. The Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit F, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference SECTION 6. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be for one year from the effective date of this Agreement The City, at its option, may extend the Agreement for two additional years SECTION 7. PERFORMANCE. The Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar Services, as are required of Consultant hereunder, in meeting its obligations under tlus Agreement The Consultant shall be notified in a timely manner, in writing, of any deficiency in it performance The Consultant shall have fifteen (15) consecutive business days from service of such notification to cure any deficiency to the reasonable satisfaction of the City SECTION 8. INSURANCE. A Insurance Requirements Consultant shall provide and maintain insurance acceptable to the City Attorney in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may anse from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives or employees Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A M Best's rating of no less than A.VII. Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance Minimum Scone of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as. (a) Insurance Services Office form Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001). (b) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, including code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025, or equivalent forms subject to the written approval of the City (c) Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of State of California and Employer's Liability insurance and covering all persons providing services on behalf of the Consultant and all risks to such persons under this Agreement. (Not needed if Self- employed with no employees.) (d) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession. 210 2 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits of insurance no less than (a) General Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the activities related to this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit (b) Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage (c) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Workers' Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of Califorma and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident (d) Errors and Omissions Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence B Other Provisions Insurance policies required by this Agreement shall contain the following provisions 1 All Policies Each insurance policy required by this paragraph 15 shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by the insurer or either party to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' pnor written notice by Certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. General Liability and Automobile Liability Covera¢es (a) City, its officers, officials, and employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects liability arising out of activities Consultant performs, products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant, or automobiles owned, leased or hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, or employees. (b) Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect to City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Consultant's insurance. (c) Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability (d) Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers 3. Workers' Compensation and Emolover's Liability Coveraee Unless the City Manager otherwise agrees in writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, officials, employees and agents for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. C Other Requirements Consultant agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this contract, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been compiled with. The City Attorney may require that Consultant furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Section. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf City reserves the tight to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 211 I Consultant shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Consultant provides 2 Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self - insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims 3 The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Consultant's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement SECTION 9. INDEMNIFICATION CLAUSE. A. CONSULTANT REPRESENTS IT IS SKILLED IN THE PROFESSIONAL CALLING NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE SERVICES AND DUTIES AGREED TO HEREUNDER BY CONSULTANT, AND CITY RELIES UPON THE SHILLS AND KNOWLEDGE OF CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT SHALL PERFORM SUCH SERVICES AND DUTIES CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS GENERALLY RECOGNIZED AS BEING EMPLOYED BY PROFESSIONALS PERFORMING SIMILAR SERVICE IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. B. CONSULTANT IS AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AND SHALL HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO BIND CITY NOR TO CREATE OR INCUR ANY OBLIGATION ON BEHALF OF OR LIABILITY AGAINST CITY, WHETHER BY CONTRACT OR OTHERWISE, UNLESS SUCH AUTHORITY IS EXPRESSLY CONFERRED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR IS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY CONFERRED IN WRITING BY CITY. CITY, ITS ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES AND VOLUNTEERS (INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLECTIVELY, "INDEMNITEES ") SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY TO CONSULTANT OR TO ANY OTHER PERSON FOR, AND CONSULTANT SHALL INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, PROTECT AND HOLD HARMLESS THE INDEMNITEES FROM AND AGAINST, ANY AND ALL LIABILITIES, CLAIMS, ACTIONS, CAUSES OF ACTION, PROCEEDINGS, SUITS, DAMAGES, JUDGMENTS, LIENS, LEVIES, COSTS AND EXPENSES OF WHATEVER NATURE, INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND DISBURSEMENTS (COLLECTIVELY "CLAIMS "), WHICH THE INDEMNITEES MAY SUFFER OR INCUR OR TO WHICH THE INDEMNITEES MAY BECOME SUBJECT BY REASON OF OR ARISING OUT OF ANY INJURY TO OR DEATH OF ANY PERSON(S), DAMAGE TO PROPERTY, LOSS OF USE OF PROPERTY, ECONOMIC LOSS OR OTHERWISE OCCURRING AS A RESULT OF OR ALLEGEDLY CAUSED BY THE PERFORMANCE OR FAILURE TO PERFORM BY CONSULTANT OF CONSULTANT'S SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR THE NEGLIGENT OR WILLFUL ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF CONSULTANT, ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS OR EMPLOYEES, IN PERFORMING ANY OF THE SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. C. IF ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IS BROUGHT AGAINST THE INDEMNITEES BY REASON OF ANY OF THE MATTERS AGAINST WHICH CONSULTANT HAS AGREED TO INDEMNIFY THE INDEMNITEES AS ABOVE PROVIDED, CONSULTANT, UPON NOTICE FROM THE CITY, SHALL DEFEND THE INDEMNITEES AT CONSULTANT'S EXPENSE BY COUNSEL ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY. THE INDEMNITEES NEED NOT HAVE FIRST PAID ANY OF THE MATTERS AS TO WHICH THE INDEMNITEES ARE ENTITLED TO INDEMNITY IN ORDER TO BE SO INDEMNIFIED. THE INSURANCE REQUIRED TO BE 2 l?_ MAINTAINED BY CONSULTANT UNDER SECTION 8 SHALL ENSURE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH 9(B), BUT THE LIMITS OF SUCH INSURANCE SHALL NOT LIMIT THE LIABILITY OF CONSULTANT HEREUNDER. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PARAGRAPH 9(B) SHALL SURVIVE THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. D. THE CONSULTANT'S INDEMNIFICATION DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS OCCURRING AS A RESULT OF THE CITY'S NEGLIGENT OR WILLFUL ACTS OR OMISSIONS. E. CONSULTANT HAS READ THIS SECTION 9 IN ITS ENTIRETY AND KNOWLINGLY AND WILLINGLY ACCEPTS THE OBLIGATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN. SECTION 10. WAIVER OR BREACH. Waiver by any party hereto of any term, condition, or covenant, or breach of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute the waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant or breach of any other term, condition, or covenant hereof SECTION 11. ASSIGNMENT. Consultant shall not assign any of its obligations pursuant to this agreement, nor any part thereof, except for moneys due consultant hereunder, without the prior written consent of the city which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld SECTION 12. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Consultant, for all purposes, in the performance of duties pursuant to this Agreement, shall be deemed to be an independent contractor Neither the City, nor any of its respective elected or appointed officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as expressly set forth in this Agreement Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. SECTION 13. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All paper and non -paper media anginal documents, reports, information and notes prepared in the course of providing the Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Contractor Notwithstanding such ownership, Consultant shall be entitled to make and obtain copies of its files. Upon termination of this Agreement by its terms or for any other reason, Consultant shall turn over to the City all documents generated by Consultant under this Agreement. SECTION 14. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its Services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations, including, but not limited to the El Segundo Municipal Code SECTION 15. COMPLIANCE WITH DOT DBE POLICY. Consultant shall comply with Department of Transportation (DOT) policy with regard to disadvantaged business enterprises (DBE) The DOT policy and the obligation of grant recipients are as follows- Policy. It is the policy of the DOT that DBE as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds under this Agreement. Consequently, the DBE requirements of 49 CFR Part 23 apply to this Agreement DBE Obligation. The recipient or its contractor agrees to ensure that DBE as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 have the maximum opportunity ,� t ,. to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provided under this Agreement In this regard all recipients or contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR Part 23 to ensure that DBE have the maximum opportunity to compete and perform contracts Recipients and their contractors shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of DOT - assisted contracts SECTION 16. COMPLIANCE WITH FAA NOISE CRITERIA. The building sound insulation modifications that the contractor designs will be installed by a builder under contract to the city The modifications must meet the FAA residential noise insulation guidelines The FAA guidelmes are set forth in the Airport Improvement Program Handbook, FAA Order 5100.38A, Chapter 7, Noise Compatibility Projects, paragraph 712(b). Residential Sound Insulation The text is provided below A Residential Noise Insulation. I For residences located in areas where exterior noise exposure is DNL 65 dB, the requisite noise level reduction (NLR) provided by the structure should be at least 20 dB in major habitable rooms The requisite NLR should be increased commensurate with any increase in exterior DNL above 65 dB 2 The design objective in a residential noise insulation project should be to achieve the requisite NLR when the project is completed (This is mathematically equivalent to achieving a DNL of 45 dB in all habitable rooms.) The project design should be based on exterior DNL and the existing NLR in the structure 3 Since it takes an improvement of at least 5 dB in NLR to be perceptible to the average person, any residential noise insulation project will be designed to provide at least that increase in NLR Note CNEL maybe substituted for DNL for projects in California Consultant shall use CNEL for all measurements. B Noise Zone. The dwelling units to be acoustically treated under this contract are located within the 65dB CNEL contour of the Projected 1987 Noise Contour Map submitted by the Department of Airports to the FAA in the Department's 1982 application for participation in the Part 150 noise mitigation program for Los Angeles International Airport. This means that the dwelling units are presumed to be subject to 65 dB CNEL or greater C Verification of Compliance. All residences are to be insulated against their existing noise environment, not those predicted for a future time The interior and exterior noise environments of each unit to receive residential sound insulation will be measured before and after receiving treatment to verify compliance with FAA noise reduction euidehnes for all habitable rooms The procedures for accomplishing verification of compliance with the FAA's residential noise insulation program policy are presented in Section 2 0 TECHNICAL APPROACH, of Consultant's Proposal, Exhibit "I" hereto. The procedures will employ simultaneous measurements of the single event noise exposure levels ( SENEL) for a group of departures at an exterior location and at one or more positions in each habitable room The difference between the average exterior SENEL and the average interior SENEL for a given room will determine the noise reduction for that room provided by the existing building structure. The equipment and measurement locations used for verification (post - construction) will replicate those used for the pre - modification survey D Reaction if Design Criteria is not Met. In the event that any rooms in the dwelling fail to meet the FAA noise reduction criteria, the Consultant will determine the reason for tins non - compliance. If non - compliance is due to the material or workmanship provided by the building Contractor, then the building Contractor will be directed by the City to correct the cause of non - compliance �� SECTION 17. COMPLIANCE WITH DOT CONTRACT CRITERIA. During the performance of this contract, Consultant, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest agrees as follows A Compliance with Regulations. Consultant shall comply with the Regulations relative to non- discrimination in federally assisted programs of the DOT Title 49, CFR, Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the "Regulations "), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract B Non - discrimination. Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. Consultant shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulations C Solicitations for Subcontractors, including Procurement of Materials and Equipment. In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by Consultant of Consultant's obligations under this contract and the Regulations relative to non - discnmmation on the grounds of race, color, or national origin D Information and Reports. Consultant shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the City or the FAA to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders, and instructions Where any information required of a Consultant is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, Consultant shall so certify to the City or the FAA, as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. E Sanctions for Non - compliance. In the event of Consultant's non - compliance with the non - discrimination provisions of this contract, the City shall impose such contract sanctions as it or the FAA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to. 1 Withholding of payments to Consultant under the Contract until the Consultant complies, and/or 2 Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract, to whole or in part. F Incorporation of Provisions. Consultant shall include the provisions of Section 17 Paragraphs A - E , above, in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto Consultant shall take such action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the City or the FAA may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non - compliance. Provided, however, that in the event a consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the consultant may request the City to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the City and in addition, the Consultant may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States SECTION 18. BINDING EFFECT. This agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 215 SECTION 19. LICENSED STATUS. The consultant shall, at all times during the term of this agreement, have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law, including, but not limited to, a city business license SECTION 20. ATTORNEY'S FEES. If litigation is reasonably required to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigation shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. SECTION 21. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed according to the laws of the State of California SECTION 22. SECTION HEADINGS. The Section Headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall have no binding effect SECTION 23. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the City and the Consultant Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations or representations not expressly set forth herem are of no force or effect Subsequent modifications to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and signed by all parries. If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall be valid and binding SECTION 24. NOTICES. Notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and given by personal service upon the party to be notified, or by depositing the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service, or its lawful successor, postage prepaid, addressed as follows (1) City of El Segundo 350 Main Street EI Segundo, CA 90245 ATTN RSI Protect Manager (2) Wyle Laboratories, Inc 128 Maryland Street El Segundo, CA 90245 ATTN: El Segundo RSI Protect Manager Notices shall be deemed given pursuant to this section upon the day of personal service, or two (2) consecutive calendar days following the deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service SECTION 25. TERMINATION. The City may at any time during the term hereof, or any extended term hereof, at its sole discretion, terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to Consultant of such termination. Should the City give notice of termination, upon its receipt, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice expressly provides otherwise Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant shall immediately prepare and serve upon the City an invoice covering all outstanding fees or other claimed compensation Within thirty (30) days after approval of said invoice, the City shall cause payment to the Consultant the amounts so approved, or the City shall provide the Consultant with a written statement objecting to the charge. For incomplete tasks in progress as of the date of the giving of notice of termination by the City, the Consultant shall be compensated for actual costs and work performed as of the effective date of such notice. 216 SECTION 26. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Agreement shall become effective upon being fully executed IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their authorized agents. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO !-0 Mayor of the City of El Segundo Date ATTEST: By City Clerk APPRO A TO ORM: By ity Attorney Ti 0 Title Date WYLE LABORATORIES, INC. 07 17 AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES -City of El Segundo and Wyle Laboratories, Inc. (October 1999) EXHIBIT A. Phase 6 Dwellings EXHIBIT B. Summary of Work Statement for Phase 6 Consultant EXHIBIT C. Labor & Material Budget Table for Phase 6 Consultant EXHIBIT D. Time & Material Rate Schedule for Phase 6 Consultant EXHIBIT E. Labor Budget for Phase 6 Consultant EXHIBIT F. Work Schedule for Phase 6 EXHIBIT G. Format for Estimated Schedule of Values for Phase 6 EXHIBIT H. Consultant's Invoice & Accounting Table EXHIBIT I. Consultant's Proposal: PROPOSAL FOR ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES ON CITY OF EL SEGUNDO RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAMS, WYLE PROPOSAL NO. 580 -1840 of 23 September 1999 218 QX IT "A" PHASE 6 DWELLINGS Optimusucally, this project will provide noise insulation for approximately 7 Single Family Dwellings (SFDs) and 6 Multi- Family dwellings (MFDs). The participants involved, their properties; phone numbers, and, the noise contour inwhich the property can be found are listed below _# Primary Candidates Addresses Phone #s 1 Sebring, Barbara 770 W Imperial Ave., # 29 322 -5917 2 Can7tano, Brent 770 W Imperial Ave., # 69 322 -6775 3 Augunen, Diane 770 W. Imperial Ave., # 35 322 -3209 4 Brown, Nancy 770 W Imperial Ave., # 71 640 -0463 5 Borja, Elena 770 W Imperial Ave., # 72 535 -6200 6 Mankos, John 439W Acacia Ave 322 -2616 7 Korbeck, Richard 435 W Acacia Ave 640 -2205 8 Harr, Betty 308 W Acacia Ave 322 -0688 9 Welton, Ron 935 Main St. 322 -4680 10 Wallace, Bruce 862 Loma Vista St. 3224591 11 Leggett, Delia 925 McCarthy Ct. 640 -9856 12 Zink, Vearl 917 Loretta St. 640 -9920 _# Supernumerary Addresses Phone #s 13 Aphn, Stewart 1102 E Acacia Ave 640 -7262 CNEL Remarks 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 70 70 CNEL Remarks 70 We will take architectural and acoustic measurements of all of the 13 land homes Number 13 will fill any vacancies created by cancellations which may occur in the primary group of 12 After we have developed cost estimates for Phase 6 we may decide to include the supernumerary homeowner in the bid process. C \rMphase6lbiddoc- Exbibit -4 EAMIT "B" SUMMARY OF WORK STATEMENT FOR PHASE 6 CONSULTANT Consultant will perform the following tasks in support of Phase 6 of the Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Progr4am for the City of El Segundo (City). Total pricing figure is based on the City's plan to insulate not less than 12 and not more than 13 homes, 6 of which are Multi-Family Dwellings (MFDs) and 6 to 7 of which are Single Family Dwellings (SFDs) listed in Exhibit "A" Certain of the tasks identified below cannot be precisely defined at this time In these cases, the number of proposed hours of the Consultant's support, managerial, technical, and admnustrative shall be submitted by the bidder as Exhibit "C ", Phase 6 Labor and Material Budget Table Where the summary below differs from the Scope of Work, described in the body of the Contract, the Scope of Work shall prevail 1 Documentation and Progress Reports. Documentation to be prepared by the Consultant shall comply with the Assurances contained in the City's FAA grant application, designated by the following Airport Improvement Project title AIP 3- 06- 0139 -NE There will be no periodic reports A summary Noise Survey Report on Phase 6 of the Residential Sound Insulanon Program of the City ofEl Segundo will be due within 30 days of the completion of construction. See 5 below 2 Meetmgs It is the City s intent to use the Consultant only at meetings requirmg technical expertise These meetings will include in-home meetings to present the RSI plan to each homeowner The Consultant is expected to attend weekly RFI meetings with the project manager and the general contractor prior to and during construction 3 Protocol In all dealings with homeowners the Consultant shall consult only with the homeowner of record or their representative A representative must be designated in writing. 4 Dwelling Selection and Measurements The selection of dwellings to receive RSI has been completed by the City Consultant shall be responsible for contacting the selected homeowners in order to take appropriate acoustical and dimensional measurements. Consuhant shall also be responsible for presenting, in detail satisfactory to the homeowner, the RSI treatment planned. Consultant shall coordinate the plan presentations with the City in order that the City may simultaneously present for the homeowner's approval the Homeowner's Permission to Proceed Authorization 5 Pre - and Post - Construction Measurements The Consultant shall take acoustical measurements of 100% of the habitable rooms of the project homes prior to and following RSI treatment The format of this report shall be prescribed by the City to comply with FAA requirements 6 Dwelling Evaluation- The Consultant shall ensure, to the extent practicable, that all dwellings selected for participation in the RSI program are structurally sound, conform grossly to the City's building codes, and are free of infestation, rot, or other malady that would require remedy prior to program partictpation. In this effort the Consultant will be assisted by the City's Building Safety division. 7 Plans and Specifications- The Consultant will inspect each project dwelling to obtain dwelling dimensions and appropriate information regarding doors, windows, ventilation systems, and other building elements as required for the preparation of plans and specifications for dwelling modification. Consultant shall draft the Phase 6 Plans and Specifications. These plans will be in a format suitable for incorporation into the Contractor's Bid Package. 8 Presentation of Plans and Specifications When the Plans are presented to the homeowner, the homeowner shall be made aware of any modifications required by law such as window egress requirements Additionally, the homeowner is to be mfmmed by the Consultant of the opportunity for architectural improvements. For example, if the plan calls for the replacement of a decorative external door with an acoustic door, and the FAA's interior noise level goal can be met by installing a new seal around the existing door and adding an acoustic secondary (storm) door then the homeowner should be given the option. Examples of secondary doors shall be shown to the homeowner 220 - C c', � a 9 DBE Compliance Consultant shall comply with appropriate DBE requirements established for contractors receiving federal giant funding Currently that requirement is 13% City will ensure that the general contractor awarded the bid for this project complies with r iniminn FAA DBE requirements 10 City Plan Check- All dwelling modification plans involving structural modifications and or mechanical or electrical work shall be subtmtted to the City Plannin g and Building Safety Department for review and approval. City shall coordinate this effort I I Bid Support Consultant shall prepare construction contract documents for each phase 6 participant dwelling in sufficient detail that contractors can reasonably prepare bids and complete the specified construction The Consultant shall assist the City in the planning and implementation of bidder's confemnce(s) including RSI installation technique training, site surveys, and bidder selection Consultant shall assist in preparation of window and door supply bid documents 12 Pre- Construction Support Consultant shall participate in pre - construction conference, review the contractor's construction schedule, and monitor contractor material orders to ensure timely initiation of construction 13 Constriction (Oversight Under the direction of the project manager, the Consultant shall be responsible for day -to-day oversight of all aspects of the construction project which relate to the sound insulation modifications being incorporated into the selected dwellings. These duties are specified in the Scope of Work In addition, the Consultant shall serve as the City's emissary, assuming a principal role in maimainn, positive homeowner/ contractor relations Contractor pricing shall be based on a 90 day construction schedule which starts upon the date of the issue of the Nonce to Proceed. 14 Payment The format of Consultant invoices sent to the City shall he as specified by the City 15 Final Report Consultant shall prepare a final project report describing the procedures employed in program execution, details of the RSI modifications to each dwelling, and the noise reduction achieved This report shall comply with FAA reporting requirements 221. EMT "C„ LABOR & MATERIAL BUDGET TABLE FOR PHASE 6 CONSULTANT Task No Task Descntition Cost of Task % of Total 1 Acoustic Measurements Pre & Post - Construction 2 Physical Measurements & Material Lists 3 Dwelling Evaluation & Plan Development 4 Final Plans & Specifications 5 Bid Package Development 6 Supplier Selection 7 Bid Conference & Bidder Selection 8 Construction Training Construction Monitoring Construction Closeout 9 Supply QA 10 Meetings 11 Travel 12 Pre- Post - Construction Acoustic Report Totals 222 - c \rs \Phase6 \b1ddoe- FXT4TRTT -r EXHIBIT "D" TIME & MATERIAL RATE SCHEDULE FOR PHASE 6 CONSULTANT Labor Hourly Grade Title (Typical) Rate 9 DmrectorMeputy Director S Principal Scientist Senior Staff Scientist Senior Staff Engineer Senior Staff Architect 7 Senior Engineer 6 Engineer 5 Senior Technician Senior Administrative Assistant 4 Administrative Assistant Travel, Materials and Services Time spent traveling to and from chent's facility or specified work sites as necessary in performance of service will be invoiced at the above stated labor rates, but shall not exceed 5% of the total contract value Travel will be itemized by labor grade on all invoices Materials, Graphic services, reproduction expenses, and any other subcontracted services will be billed at invoice cost plus 20 percent Billine and Pavment Tetras Billing for work performed will be submitted monthly Payment terns are net 30 days, based on normal credit approval 223 .c,➢i -.111 1--- , . -I- EXHIBIT "E" LABOR BUDGET FOR PHASE 6 CONSULTANT Task r r I Sub- I Total Non - XI_ Tml, Tl�crnnhnn 10 ! R 17! 61111 I S Marginal Cnnrraernr Lahnr Lahnr 1 Tnral 1 1 V Acoustic Measurements Pre & Post - Construction - - - -- 2 Physical Measurements & Material Lists 3 Dwelling Evaluation& Plan Development a Final Plans & Specifications 5 Bid Package Development 6 Supplier Selection 7 Bid Conference & Bidder Selecuon 8 Construction Tmmmg Construcrion Monitoring Construction Closeout 9 Supply QA 10 Meetings 11 Pre- Post- Consmeuon Acoustic Report Totals 224 - c 1rsi%Phaseftiddoc- EXHISME EXHIBIT "F" WORK SCHEDULE FOR PHASE 6 1999 Activity Status June Develop Budget and Agreement with Consultant Completed July Develop Brochure for Phase 6 Completed July Meet with program candidates, brief them, and obtain commitments to program Completed August Publish Request for Proposal for Consultant Services Completed September Verify Qualifications of Consultant Short List Completed October Conduct Proposal Evaluation Board Completed November Submit Program Plan and Consultant Agreement to City Council for approval Completed November Take pre - construction architectural and acoustic measurements November Develop Plans and Specifications December Develop General Contractor and Supplier Contracts December Complete Proposed Supply and General Contractor Contracts 2000 Activity January Solicit Supplier and General Contractor bids for Phase 6 January Conduct site visits, acoustical training and project briefings for Contractors/Suppliers February Verify qualifications of lowest Supplier and General Contractor bidders February Submit Bid Evaluation Board's recommendations to City Council for award of bids March Suppliers take measurements and fabricate materials March General Contractor submit initial orders for material April Begin construction, upon receipt of initial shipment of materials, and issuance Notice to Proceed June /July Complete construction July Conduct post construction noise measurements Aug ✓Sept Submit final report to City Counc&FAA October Phase 6 completion date ?-25 'Al d B!. W N C m a u �3 u E 0 N d m F_ N d /cN L� fr m C 3 0 u b u m a 3 m 'u O N N m N M 0 V u v 0 u C N u m - c u ^� u E c O m V C 7 Y C m m m tO u a '^ cm O m N C - o c '9 C u o u Uh F a 1 h a a Y Y a a E e 2 nn� r V H m X 9 x 5 p 0 H en N nl rl a i 7 i r f i I � n Q n N 7 Cu 'm0 i T W Zp C y t- nn� r V H m X 9 x 5 EXHIBIT "H" CONSULTANT'S INVOICE & ACCOUNTING TABLE Billing Number: Invoice Number: Bill To CITY EL SEGUNDO ' 350 MAIN STREET EL SEGUNDO CA 90245 Customer Number: Prime Contract Number* Project Number: Customer PO Number. Project Name Project Period of Performance: Terms* Due Date Labor Grade 4 Labor Grade 4 Double Time Labor Grade 4 Over Time Labor Grade 5 Labor Grade 5 Labor Grade 5 Over Time Labor Grade 6 Labor Grade 6 Labor Grade 7 Labor Grade 8 Labor Grade 8 Materials & Supplies Direct Travel Invoice Subtotal ivoice Total i Current Incurred Hours- Cumulative Incurred Hours: To Invoice Date: MIT Remit To: Wyle Laboratories, Inc PO Box 2153 Department 3500 Birmingham AL 35287 -3500 Contract Value Cost: Fee Total: Cumulative Amount Billed: Billing Period From: To: Current Cumulative Cumulative Eate Amount fiords Amount Current Cumulative Amount Amount ') 2! Wyle Laboratories, Inc. Labor Distribution Detail by Date and PLC Organization: 1.01.03580 Month May Year: 1999 Date. 5128199 Time 02.25PM Date I Account I Account Name Employee Name Hours rolect Labor UategOrY 9 23900 03580 ELS Accoustics Customer WYLE LABORATORIES 1107,00 10055.02 RSIP13. 08.8139 NC - 5/2/99 4030 -055 IDL WIO Accoustics In -Hou IGARSH, ROSEMARY -1001 Project Labor Category 5 1 00 512/99 5/9/99 5116199O 5/23/99 4030 -055 DL W/O Accoustics In -Hou DL W/O Accoustics In -Hou W/O Accoustics In -Hou IDL W/O Accoustics In -Hou 1PALLINI, PATRICK 1 5.00 400 200 2.00 Project a or CategorY6 13.00 10055.02 RSIP/3. 088139 NC=- �_- ''/V�(µ�..,/' ' GUNDO - 14.00 10056.02= RSIP/3-0B•8139NE -. -r z.: _ - .,�,W,.�•a - -, 5/2/99 5/9/99 5/16/99 5/23/99 4030 -055 DL W/O Accousucs In -Hou DL W/O Accoustics In -Hou DL W/O Accoustics In -Hou DL W/O Accoustics In -Hou ALLINI, PA RICK 5001 5 00 2 00 3 00 rolect a or ategory 6 15.00 10056.02 RSIP/3.06.8139NE Customer, CRILEESEGUNDO_ 15.w© 10056.08 RSIP/34)"139 NE - - .- . - 5/23/9914030-055 IDL W/O Accoustics In -Hou JKAYTOR, JOHN A 1 9001 Project Labor Category 8 9.00 10056.08 RSIP/30"139NE mow!- -„ . CC:KELSEGUNDO- - ,;9:09 10056.9 RSIPrJ-0"139 NE ..a -_. - - - —41M t I.. XS . S.iKe_Ir {-y 5/16/99 4030 -055 IDL WIO Accoustics In -go' 7U70– R. JOHN A 4001 Project Labor CategOrY 8 4.00 10056.09 RSI1234"139 NE Customer - - 4:001 - 10065 PHASE -II RSIP - - - - 512/99 519199 5/16/99 5/23/99 4030 -055 DL W/O Accoustics In -Hou OL W/O Accoustics In -Hou DL W/O Accoustics In -Hou DL W/O Accoustics in -Hou WOZNIAK, DEEANNA 13 00 200 2.00 550 rolect --890—r a egory 7 22.50 10065 PHASE It RSIP Customer CtTY4NGLEWOOD 22.50 10065.05 PHASE It RSIP - 519/99 1403G.055 JDL W/O Accoustics In-Houl"YTOR, JOHN A 1500 rolect Labor Qategory 8 1500 R"p O ,CP TOOLMWYLE _RrncusTOM"WRO-ncormu- iwflvrLCM iwt Page 5 228 >.e>s PROPOSAL FOR ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES ON CITY OF EL SEGUNDO RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAMS WYLE PROPOSAL NO. 580-1940 Submitted to. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Airport Projects Administrator Department of Planning & Building Safety 350 Main St. El Segundo, CA 90245 Subrmtted by: WYLE LABORATORIES, INC. Acoustics Research & Consulting Group 128 Maryland St El Segundo, CA 90245 SEPTEMBER 23, 1999 229 TABLE OF CONTENTS u i.be m 230 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 20 TECHNICAL APPROACH 4 2.1 Reports and Documents 4 2.2 Federal Program Compliance 5 2.3 Development of Design Criteria 5 2.4 Administration & Project Overview.. 5 2.5 Phase 6 Plan Development 6 2.6 Acoustic Measurements 6 2.7 Physical Measurements . . . . . . . . . 7 2.8 Materials List. . . . . . . . . . 7 2.9 Dwelling Condition Evaluation. . . . . . . . 7 210 Dwelling Selection. 7 211 Selection of Suppliers . . . 8 2.12 Development of Bid Packages 8 2.13 Bidder Conference. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.14 Bidder Reference Checks 8 2.15 Bidder Selection. 9 216 Contractor Training . . . 9 2.17 Construction Oversight . . . . . . . . . . 9 218 Supply Line Quality Assurance 11 219 Meetings . . . 11 2.20 Reports. 11 221 Public Relations. . . . . . . 12 2.22 Work Schedule. . . . . . . . 12 30 MANAGEMENT AND STAFFING. 13 3.1 Project Manager. 13 3.2 Technical Staff 15 3.3 Sub - Consultants and Technical Specialists (MBFJWBE) . . . 16 34 Contract Administration.. 18 4.0 PRIOR RELATED WYLE EXPERIENCE.. 23 4.1 FAA AIP Projects . . . . . . 23 42 El Segundo Projects. . . . 30 u i.be m 230 1.0 INTRODUCTION Wyle Laboratories, Inc., a corporation based to the City of El Segundo for 50 years, is pleased to offer the services of its Acoustics Research & Consulting Group for the City's proposed continuation of its Residential Sound Insulation Program Local Wyle staff have successfully supported sound insulation projects in the City since the first demonstration projects on El Segundo dwellings in 1985 (single family detached dwellings) and 1987 (multifamily apartment buildings) and, most recently, in the AIP funded project on 71 dwellings administered by the City's Airport Projects Administrator, Mr Harvey Holden Wyle's capabilities, resources, and experience pertinent to the City's continuing program are unique in many respects — specifically- 9 Knowledge and experience in designing remedial sound insulation for residential buildings within the project's boundaries in El Segundo, allowing for different noise impingement conditions and vaned pre - existing construction characteristics • Knowledge and experience in complying with local, State, and Federal requirements imposed on these programs • Unique knowledge of the design objectives and guidelines for sound insulation due to being primary authors of local and FAA guideline documents on the subject and having demonstrated the validity, cost - effectiveness, and consistency of these methodologies in applications to many types of residences • Participation by Wyle's El Segundo staff as design consultants to 40 separate sound insulation projects for 13 different clients at eight different airport vicinities during the past 15 years These projects have been notably successful in meeting their goals and have been copied at many other airports throughout the country 1 �e 231 • A unique assembly of specialized senior staff at El Segundo who, while managing individual projects for different clients, provide an integrated design review and technical management team available to all Wyle sound insulation projects. These staff include: John Kaytor, AIA, Senior Staff Architect with specialized experience of projects in El Segundo as well as those in Orange County, San Francisco, Inglewood, Tucson, and Dallas -Ft Worth Stephen Martin, Ph.D., P.E., Senior Acoustics Engineer with specialized experience in projects at Burbank, Fresno, San Bruno, and Dallas -Ft. Worth Airports. Rick Herz, Senior Construction Specialist, with 5 years lead staff involvement in the Port of Seattle program and, subsequently, 2 years specialized experience with Wyle's services to LAX and Los Angeles County programs as well as experience with the previous 71 -home project in El Segundo Deeanna Wozniak, Graduate Architect with specialized experience in preparing and compiling construction documents for the sound insulation at Detroit Airport (in conjunction with Wyle design staff). Roy Chesley, Construction Manager, recently hired by Wyle to manage the implementation program at Burbank- Glendale- Pasadena Airport. This combination of staff skills and experience is currently being used to develop and improve Wyle's longstanding reputation as a leader of sound insulation technology, dating back to key study projects since 1969 and, more recently, as a moderating influence for the supplier industry and its development of new products and materials. • Fully staffed office facility close to the project area and within the City of El Segundo, inclusive of all document preparation and reproduction equipment, acoustical instrumentation and noise measurement laboratory, eight AutoCAD stations for architectural support staff, 24 -hour reception and phone - answering service, on -site contract - management services, and on -site scheduling staff for interaction with participant homeowners. Project support staff 2 —' dl. �)1z includes acoustical engineers, assistant architect staff, noise measurement technicians, and word processing staff This proposal of services is therefore based on a full utilization of Wyle's El Segundo facility and acoustical staff In addition to this, Wyle proposes to subcontract field architectural services, HazMat inspection services, and some construction inspection activity to local or registered DBE firms, as was done in Wyle's previous contract with the City, At present, these firms comprise- • Isa Architects, a registered DBE firm, who will conduct field surveys for the preparation of dwelling floor plans to be used in construction documents and scope of work descriptions. • Alliance Environmental, a registered WBE firm, who will conduct hazardous materials sampling and testing • Western States Design Group, a DBE mechanical engineering firm. The City's goal of 13% DBE participation to comply with the project's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program will be met by the use of these and other subcontractors for the City. In summary, Wyle Laboratories staff and resources proposed for this project are currently and permanently based in the City of El Segundo, have the necessary expertise to provide the City with a unique support capability, and will have the ability to provide these capabilities on an immediate, as- needed basis commensurate with the requirements of the City. The following proposal provides a description of these technical services (Section 2.0), Wyle's proposed staffing for the project (Section 3.0), and Wyle's prior related experience (Section 4.0) as required by the City's Request for Proposal document. 3 - - d iaeantu -in 233 2.0 TECHICAL APPROACH 2.l Reports and Documents Standard Project Specifications and Details shall be prepared in the CSI (Construction Specifications Institute) format as they have been for previous Wyle sound insulation projects in El Segundo. The documents will incorporate all of the improvements in materials and techniques that have been developed since the last project. These include improved ventilation system design, new sliding glass door products, and a more decorative hinged acoustic door product Plans and Modification Requirements shall be prepared in an 8 -1/2" x 11" format as in past Wyle projects. Floor plans will be generated by AutoCAD software and modification requirements will be prepared using a Wyle proprietary design program. Instructions to Bidders and Bid Forms will be developed and prepared to meet FAA and CDBG requirements and will be verified as directed by the APA Noise surveys will be conducted before and after construction by Wyle acoustic engineers and documented for each dwelling in a standardized format which can be used (a) to assess the pre - existing sound insulation of a dwelling and (b) to evaluate the pre- and post - construction noise reduction values for a modified building. The procedure provides a standardized method of conducting acoustical testing in an accurate and consistent manner and in compliance with state, national, and international standards for equipment, calibration, and operational techniques. It is directed to obtaining a measurement of the Noise Reduction of an existing furnished room or enclosed space subjected to aircraft noise overflights. The Noise Reduction can thereby be applied directly to the value given by the Airport for the exterior CNEL at the dwelling to calculate the equivalent Interior CNEL as required by the FAA and California Title 21. Requests for Information (RFI) issued by contractors will be answered in writing by the Wyle representative with the review and approval of the APA. Cl io W rs Weekly Work Progress Reports will be prepared and maintained by the Wyle representative. The reports shall include brief descriptions of work that has been started, is continuing, and has been completed. The reports shall also list work that is anticipated for the following week and can be produced on FAA Form 5320 -1. Technical assistance in writing specifications for windows, doors, and other appurtenances shall be provided on an as- needed basis by a Wyle technical writer experienced in sound insulation and construction Consolidated lists of windows and doors will be provided by experienced Wyle personnel so that they include all the necessary information for fair and proper bid process. Reports and other documents shall be prepared by experienced Wyle technical writers and word - processing personnel as requested and directed by the APA. The final report of the results of the modification work will be one of the most informative reports that will be prepared. 2.2 Federal Program Compliance Wyle has worked closely with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for many years and has helped it develop some of the FAA standards This experience will be used to an advantage in complying with the regulations of the FAA and other agencies. 2.3 Development of Design Criteria This has been a major Wyle specialty for many years and was used by Wyle to prepare the Design Guide mentioned on page 3 of the present RFP. Wyle will propose, for APA approval, positive revisions to the Design Guide These revisions are the result of technical and procedural progress that has developed since the Design Guide was published. 2.4 Administration and Project Overview This will be accomplished by the maintenance of all records and documents specified in the RFP. These records and documents shall be maintained in a central location of Wyle's Acoustics Research & Consulting Group's department so that they are readily accessible to s '°°� 235 authorized Wyle personnel and the APA. In addition, a database similar to Microsoft Access will be established and maintained to provide tracking data for all important activities. 2.5 Phase 6 Plan Development This will be assisted by Wyle as required by the RFP. Wyle has worked successfully with the APA in the previous El Segundo Sound Insulation Program and will use that experience for the benefit of this program. 2.6 Acoustic Measurements These will be performed as follows In brief, exterior and interior measurements of SENEL are simultaneously obtained for each room in a dwelling during actual aircraft noise events. These measurements are stored electronically for subsequent evaluation. This procedure is continued to include at least five significant aircraft events. This method can be supplemented by other techniques such as the use of an artificial sound source for more detailed or technically complex investigations where local aircraft noise does not provide a suitable noise signal. For each room, the arithmetic difference between each measured Exterior SENEL and the average of two Interior SENEL values (at two locations) is the Noise Reduction value measured for any single noise event. These NR values for a series of events are subsequently averaged. This procedure will be applied to 100% of the participating dwellings for both pre- modification and post - modification conditions These results are presented in tabular form for assessment of the project achievements. Wyle resources for these surveys include fully - trained staff and a unique inventory of more than 60 measurement (instrumentation) systems, all of which are in continuously valid calibration Cel � -1 r, In order to expedite the post - construction noise measurement schedule, Wyle will propose that the time and date of the noise measurements be established during the final inspection process rather than relying on telephone scheduling after the final inspection. 2.7 Physical Measurements Physical measurements and a detailed survey of existing structural conditions for each project dwelling shall be conducted by Wyle MBE/WBE subcontractors and a Wyle representative These data will be used as a basis for determining the required modifications and for developing a CAD floor plan. In future projects on a larger scale, Wyle will propose that the design task also be performed on -site during the visit to each dwelling. Wyle has implemented this combined approach in other programs in order to increase efficiency and quality control. 2.8 Materials List Materials Lists will be developed by Wyle as an important by- product of the detailed inspection of each project dwelling and technical specifications will be prepared by an experienced Wyle technical writer to support the requirements that are developed during the design process. 2.9 Dwelling Condition Evaluation This will be conducted, as required by the RFP, during the visit described in Section 2.7 of this proposal. Experienced Wyle personnel will perform this important task due to its significance. The City may consider the option of providing a City building inspector to accompany the project team in order to provide on -site interpretation of certain building code issues. This option of City involvement is being used by at least one program in this area 2.10 Dwelling Selection The dwellings listed in Exhibit "A" of the RFP can be finalized after all of the data described herein and in the RFP has been collected and analyzed. The most important aspects of the selection process include physical condition, existing code compliance, homeowner cooperation, and acoustic eligibility The City can establish a policy that would eliminate 7 - -dam 237 dwellings or parts of dwellings that already meet the CNEL 45 dB goal. When dwelling selection is finalized, Wyle can establish appointments with homeowners to complete all of the documentation required. Wyle personnel are trained and experienced in these tasks, having performed them in all of the Wyle projects done in Southern California since 1969 2.11 Selection of Suppliers This shall be accomplished with the Wyle- developed materials lists and specifications described in Section 2.8 of this proposal. In addition, Wyle will help develop, under the direction of the APA, supplier selection criteria to be included in the bid documents as contract requirements. One of the most important supplier criteria is an ability to meet specified material delivery dates 2.12 Development of Bid Packages This shall be in accordance with the requirements of the RFP and with the approach used in the Wyle documents prepared for the previous El Segundo Sound Insulation Program. In addition, Wyle will implement a document tracking system, similar to Microsoft Access, to monitor the development of all required documents. 2.13 Bidders Conference Bidder Conferences have had Wyle participation in most of the projects that Wyle has been involved with since 1969. Wyle's approach to a Bidders Conference is to briefly explain the bid documents in terms that a typical construction contractor can understand and to show how most of the work is relatively standard and to point out areas of the work that require special attention, such as the installation of heavy acoustic doors, that should be performed by a carpenter who has significant and recent door installation experience 2.14 Bidder Reference Checks These will have Wyle participation, under the direction of the APA, as necessary for the selection process such as ll yle ...� 238 • Verify General Contractor's license status with the State Contractors Licensing Board. • Contact professional references and prepare a written report of responses. 2.15 Bidder Selection These will have Wyle participation, under the direction of the APA, as necessary for the selection process 2.16 Contractor Training This shall be conducted by Wyle, as has been done on past projects, during the preconstruction meeting when the project procedures and requirements are discussed, such as the following • Contract time • Liquidated damages • Bonds and insurance • Subcontractor list • Construction Schedule • Schedule of values • Pay requests • Wage reports • Substitutions • Submittals • Change orders • Permits • Job office • Material storage • Work hours • Sanitary facilities • Clean -up • Job meetings 0 __�Tiwe ?39 • Inspections • Basic acoustics • Construction specialties 2.17 Construction Oversight Construction oversight shall be performed as required by the RFP and as directed by the APA Wyle personnel are qualified and experienced in construction oversight, having performed this task (to varying degrees) on many Wyle projects. Due to the fact that Wyle personnel have experience in deterrmmng detailed construction requirements for sound insulation projects, they are best qualified to ensure that the following tasks, as a minimum, are properly performed• a Subrmttals should be reviewed by Wyle personnel and delivered to the APA with specific recommendations b Material inspection, particularly of acoustic materials, will be performed by Wyle personnel Wyle uses a laser device to spot -check acoustic window glazing thickness due to the fact that glazing thickness directly affects Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings In a recent Wyle project, most of the delivered windows were found to have incorrect glazing, a very rare occurrence but an important one to monitor. c Inspection of the work can be performed by Wyle, as directed by the APA, particularly where complex or unforeseen conditions require significant experience in sound insulation projects. d Observation of the work in progress can be performed by Wyle, as directed by the APA, due to Wyle's significant experience in sound insulation projects in El Segundo and elsewhere e Reports to the Contractor shall be issued by Wyle in writing, as directed by the APA, when any part of the work does not conform to the Contract Documents for Construction f Clarifications or interpretations of the Contract Documents shall be issued to the Contractor, under the direction of the APA when they become necessary 101 i. � i.s 240 g Contractors' suggestions for modifications to the Contract Documents, or Contractors' Requests for Information (RFI) shall be reviewed by Wyle and recommendations submitted to the APA. Ttus procedure is typical of all of the sound insulation projects in Wyle's experience. h Photographs will be taken by Wyle personnel as required by the RFP and as directed by the APA. This procedure, being typical of all of the sound insulation projects in Wyle's experience, is supported by Wyle's extensive use of digital camera technology which can be used as directed by the APA i. Wyle will maintain physical and electronic files and records of the project as directed by WIMA l j Weekly progress reports will be prepared as described in Section 2.1 of this proposal k Wyle shall assist in reviewing and field - verifying Contractor Wage/Payroll Reports and will also review applications for payment. These activities are an integral part of all sound insulation construction projects and, as such, are an important part of Wyle's expenence I Punch list procedures will be performed by Wyle as required by the RFP, the APA, and Wyle's extensive experience with final inspections m Wyle can, at the direction of the APA, inspect all project dwellings before warranty expiration for evidence of non - conformance and issue a report of findings and recommendations. 2.18 Supply Line Quality Assurance Wyle will assist the APA in Supply Line Quality Assurance. Wyle's extensive experience with suppliers of acoustical materials can help in anticipating and monitoring supply and quality control issues. 11 1. a AM 241 2.19 Meetings Meetings will be attended by Wyle as directed by the APA and as required by the RFP and project activities. Certain meetings are typical such as Pre -Bid, Pre- Construction, regular weekly/bi- weekly Construction meetings, and Homeowner meetings whenever needed to resolve any concerns 2.20 Reports Wyle will prepare reports as explained in Section 2 1 of this proposal, as required by the RFP and as directed by the APA. Wyle has extensive experience with FAA requirements and FAA personnel and can properly perform this task. 2.21 Public Relations Public relations are a very important part of a sound insulation program where one of the owner's largest assets is involved As such, Wyle personnel have developed sensitivity to a wide range of owner concerns and the resolution of those concerns such as • On -time work scheduling • Timely completion of the work • Property protection during construction • Property damage • Competent workmanship as it relates to the appearance of the finished work • Contractor courtesy • Provision of promised modifications 2.22 Work Schedule Wyle can perform the Services required by the RFP in accordance with Exhibit "F" of the RFP and as directed by the APA due to Wyle's extensive experience in meeting a wide variety of work schedule requirements for sound insulation programs 12 i. ?42 3.0 MANAGEMENT AND STAFFING Figure 3 -1 shows the proposed staffing for the City of El Segundo project, with staff, contract, and project management assignments being a continuation of Wyle's previous services to the City. The technical support staff have similarly worked on the City's previous program and will be supplemented when necessary by other Wyle El Segundo staff and subcontractors These are discussed further as follows (resumes are included at the end of this section) 3.1 Project Manager Wyle's proposed Project Manager for the City's new project is Mr. John Kaytor, a California registered architect with more than 15 years experience in managing sound insulation programs, including the 1987 demonstration project and recent AIP project in El Segundo. Mr Kaytor will be responsible for ensuring that sufficient staff personnel are available to perform all required tasks in a timely and efficient manner, that all items are provided when necessary, and for attending all required meetings Mr. Kaytor is a key member of the Wyle Research staff for this project and is fully experienced in all architectural aspects of the sound insulation of buildings. He was personally responsible for Wyle's activity on completed residential sound insulation projects at Inglewood, Ontario, Orange County, and Tucson. Mr. Kaytor also managed Wyle's involvement in the sound insulation of dwellings in Playa del Rey and Westchester. Mr. Kaytor also directed the production of video presentations for the residential sound insulation programs at El Segundo and Los Angeles County Mr. Kaytor works closely with all of the Wyle Research staff and with various subcontractors (usually local architects) and construction contractors in these and other sound insulation projects. 13 i. a m ?43 Staff David Brown Raul Nen Scheduling Rosemary Garsh City of El Segundo Administrator Harvey Holden John Kavtor, AIA Acoustical S Marun/A. Lung Subcontract Architect Isa Architects Subcontract HazMat Alliance Env Figure 3 -1 Project Staff Wyle Contracts M Lloyd Kosanke Noise Survey Services Patrick Pallmi Subcontract Mech Enzineet Wstrn States Des - _diatom 244 Mr. Kaytor's involvement in this project will be to provide overall architectural quality control and design advice, interact with the staff in preparing plans and specifications for the project, and provide ongoing assistance to the staff in specific areas associated with architectural matters such as specific forms of work specifications, specialty materials and products, cost estimation, and quality control. He will be available on an as- needed basis and will not have any scheduling conflict with his other ongoing projects since these do not require his full -time involvement. Mr. Kaytor will be supported in his project management role by Wyle's departmental support staff including Staff Manager (Mr. David Brown), Contracts Manager (Mr Lloyd Kosanke), and Admimstrative Assistants, Secretaries, Schedulers, and Word - Processors. While all of these resources will not be continuously needed for the City's project and therefore will not burden the project with unnecessary costs, they are available to ensure an efficient performance for the City by the Wyle organization. 3.2 Technical Staff The technical support staff for the City's projects comprise specialist engineers, architectural assistants, and technical staff of Wyle's El Segundo Acoustics Research & Consulting Group and subcontractors for specific field survey activities. These include: Stephen Martin The proposed Acoustical Engineer for Wyle's services is Dr Stephen Martin of Wyle Research Dr Martin has been a member of the Wyle staff for more than 4 years and has 15 years experience in performing and managing acoustical projects. At present, Dr Martin is acoustical consultant to ongoing sound insulation projects at San Bruno (SFO), Burbank, Ontario, and Fresno. He provides acoustical engineering design services on all other Wyle sound insulation projects, including LAWA's current program Dr Martin has extensive "hands -on" experience in all acoustical and technical areas associated with sound insulation projects He is also highly knowledgeable in all areas associated 15 i. a m 245 with the FAR Part 150 Regulation and its implementation. He interacts closely with project staff at all stages of each project and has been highly successful in meeting schedules, budgets, and technical goals in each of his projects. Dr. Martin is a California registered Professional Engineer. Patrick Pallini Mr Pallmi (an El Segundo Resident) is fully experienced in the use of Wyle's acoustical monitoring and analysis equipment and has performed acoustical field surveys for various environmental noise programs He supports Wyle staff in the performance of FAR Part 150 noise monitoring projects for the measurement of building Noise Level Reductions in sound insulation projects Mr. Pallmi is fluent in English and Spanish languages. Raul Neri Raul Nen supervises a team of five assistant architects/draftspersons on the Noise Mitigation staff at Wyle. He has participated in programs currently in progress around LAX, Burbank, Fresno, and Ontario airports. He conducts field surveys, CAD reviews, homeowner interviews, and prepares plans and specification documents for project dwellings. He holds an Associates Degree in Architecture. Rosemary Garsh Rosemary Garsh (also an El Segundo Resident) has supported the City of El Segundo in its previous Sound Insulation Program coordinating Architectural Surveys, Pre- Modification noise measurements, and Post - Modification noise measurements She also acted as a point of contact for the residents of the City. 3.3 Sub - Consultants and Technical Specialists (MBE/WBE) Wyle's staff in El Segundo will provide the mayor skills necessary for the implementation of the City's sound insulation program. However, subcontractors will be included in the project team to augment Wyle's staff and provide specialized program skills. A local architectural firm will be retained to assist in dwelling surveys and the preparation of specifications. A mechanical 16 ug i. C i. 246 engineering firm will be retained to provide ventilation system design and general mechanical system support and an environmental investigation will perform hazardous materials investigation. It is anticipated that the cost of these services will total at least 13% of the contract price. Isa Architects, Inc., a local registered MBE firm, will provide architectural support by Toshiro Isa and his staff. His background encompasses a wide range of projects including site analysis, construction, and remodeling projects for the Federal Government His firm has supported sound insulation projects for the City of El Segundo on a continuous basis for the past 4 years in developing as -built plans for dwellings in the LAX Airport vicinity Toshiro Isa is a Califomia State Registered Architect He will continue to support the program in this role Alliance Environmental Services is a California- based, certified women/disadvantaged business enterprise company that provides environmental and due diligence services for a variety of clients Their State of California certified personnel conduct asbestos surveys, asbestos abatement design and supervision, lead -based paint surveys, and operations and maintenance plans All work is conducted in accordance with local, State, and Federal regulations. The managing director and senior project supervisor for Alliance is Ms. Jean Napier, a State of California Registered Environmental Assessor, CAL -OSHA Certified Asbestos Consultant, and Interim Certified Lead Inspector /Assessor Western States Design Group, formerly Hollins Engineering Company, is a Van Nuys- based, mmonty -owned mechanical engineering firm founded in 1980 by its Principal /Owner Sylvester Hollins. Over the past decade, the company has earned a reputation as a full service mechanical engineering firm that produces professional projects for clients on time and on budget The company has supplied consulting engineering services over the past 5 years to sound insulation projects at Orange County, Burbank, Ontario, and LAX Airport neighborhoods for the specification of ventilation and/or HVAC systems. Mr. Hollins is a California Licensed Mechanical Engineer. 17 i. a .a ?47 3.4 Contract Administration Administration of the contract with the City will be provided by Mr. Lloyd Kosanke, with support by Ms. Marguerite Goulde. These staff are part of Wyle's corporate resources responsible for financial status reports Wyle Laboratories has implemented Aeltek's Costpoint, an integrated accounting system designed for project- onented environments, in August 1998. The system provides all accounting and financial functions normally required by a business as well as many special functions that will assist Program Managers in direction and control of contract performance. Costpoint will provide single source input for labor, subcontractor expenses, material, other direct costs and cost pool data Accounting data integrity and timeliness of reporting meets or exceeds General Accepted Accounting Principles standards. The cost management system and procedures will capture costs for each project as directed by the Program Plan and is the data source for Monthly Cost Reporting. Costpoint provides a variety of standard project status reports Additionally, the CP Reports feature provides the capability to developed user - defined reports. This feature will allow the Program Manager to employ the various accounting, financial, and monitoring devices to assure budget constraint compliance and milestone accomplishment. The Program Manager can establish budgets and track performance at detailed level with the flexibility to produce summary reports at virtually any level. Review of each Program Plan task and impacts on the entire program will be accomplished at a minimum of once a month. A Project Review Group will be established consisting of the Wyle key personnel. The Group will meet periodically to review cost data, investigate methods to reduce project expenditures, and provide long -term planning. Special emphasis will be placed upon continuous improvement in cost control methods and determining methods leading to an optimum cost management procedure. 18 W ar�'`,o im 248 JOHN A. KAYTOR POSITION: Senior Staff Architect JOINED WYLE: 1969 and 1987 PRINCIPAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: Manages the design and preparation of plans and specifications for soundproofing projects. Consultant to engineering groups regarding architectural design and construction. Coordinates the work of independent consulting architects on soundproofing projects. BACKGROUND: Wyle Research, El Segundo, California — Senior Staff Architect. Coordinates the design and preparation of plans and specifications for soundproofing and other architectural projects, working in cooperation with Wyle engineering staff. Currently manager of sound insulation programs at Ontario International Airport, John Wayne Airport in Orange County, California, the City of Inglewood, and the City of El Segundo. Was principal design architect on school sound insulation projects including two schools near Reno Cannon International Airport, five schools in the Ontano - Montclair School District, and three schools near San Diego International Airport. Norman Engineering Company, Los Angeles, California (3 -112 years) — Project Architect Responsible for design and construction of large military-industrial buildings such as a Test Support Facility at Edwards Air Force Base and an Antenna Test Facility for Lockheed Corporation, Sunnyvale, California. David Klages & Associates, Costa Mesa, Califorma (10 years) — Architect Responsible for the design and construction of commercial, residential, banking, and recreational facilities Killmgsworth, Brady & Associates, Long Beach, California (2 years) — Architect. Responsible for architectural detailing on various commercial, residential, and hotel projects. Wyle Laboratories, El Segundo, California (1 year) — Architect Responsible for managing architectural design and construction for a pilot soundproofing project for the Los Angeles Department of Airports. EDUCATION: B.A Architecture, University of Southern California, 1964. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: Board of Directors, AIA South Bay Chapter, American Institute of Architects (AIA) California Council of the American Institute of Architects CERTIFICATION: Registered Architect, State of California, 1970, current. wA ?49 STEPHEN A. MARTIN POSITION: Senior Engineer/Project Manager JOINED WYLE: 1995 PRINCIPAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: Responsible for technical direction of programs involving aeroacoustics, noise and vibration control, and system design BACKGROUND: Wyle Laboratories, El Segundo, California. Currently managing sound insulation programs at San Francisco, Burbank, and Fresno airports Conduct design checks for sound insulation of executive, commercial, educational, and special -use buildings in noise - impacted areas including projects for Los Angeles Department of Airports (Engineering) Manages special projects to investigate noise propagation and noise intrusion. Provides technical support to environmental and industrial noise programs for Southern California Edison and other industries. Registered acoustical consultant in Orange and San Diego Counties, California. Paul S. Veneklasen and Associates, Santa Monica California (13 years) Acoustical Consultant Performed noise and vibration measurements of industrial equipment, traffic, aircraft, and mechanical equipment. Worked with architects and engineers to maintain proper sound and vibration isolation or to meet local noise ordinances. Experience includes computer programming for specialized acoustical purposes Designed audio amplification systems for schools, churches, and auditoriums Qualified as a laboratory and field technician for sound transmission loss, sound insulation, impact isolation, and sound absorption using ASTM Standards. University of California, Los Angeles, California. Research Assistant for Ph.D. Research Work in Aeroacoustics (4 years). Built eight- channel computer data acquisition and analysis system for experimental data reduction of turbulence - generated noise including design of eight - channel anti- aliasmg filter. Designed experimental test apparatus and performed measurements and data gathering at NASA -Ames Research Center for Ph.D. dissertation on impinging jet noise generation. EDUCATION: Ph D , Mechanical Engineering, Acoustics Emphasis, University of California, Los Angeles, 1993 M S , Mechanical Engineering, Acoustics Emphasis, University of California, Los Angeles, 1987 B S , Electrical and Electronic Engineering, California Polytechnic University, Pomona, California, 1981 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: Acoustical Society of America Audio Engrneenng Society Registered Professional Engineer, Electrical Engineering State of California, License No E- 12022,1984 Jnbmatmin 250 RAUL NERI, JR. POSITION: Designer JOINED WYLE: 1997 PRINCIPLE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: Provides ArcCad design support, performs site measurements and inspections, and homeowner reviews for residential sound insulation programs. BACKGROUND: Wyle Laboratories, El Segundo, California. Supervises a team of five assistant architects/draftspersons on the Norse Mitigation staff at Wyle. Participates in programs currently in progress around LAX, Burbank, Fresno, and Ontario airports. Conducts field surveys, CAD reviews, homeowner interviews, and prepares plans and specification documents for project dwellings. Knsti K. Skelton, Architects, Rolling Hills Estates, California, Project Manager (3 years). Performed architectural drafting of construction documents, job site inspections and field measurements of structural foundations and overall floor plan designs Dwight E Bennett & Associates, Architects, Long Beach, California (10 years) Project manager for architectural working drawings. EDUCATION: Associates Degree, Architecture, Los Angeles Harbor College, 1991. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: American Institute of Architects (Student Member) -- di.ea>a`M*W 951 PATRICK PALLINI POSITION: Acoustical Field Survey Technician JOINED WYLE: 1985 -88, 1997 to Present PRINCIPAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: Maintain acoustic laboratory, including data acquisition and analysts equipment. Perform field noise measurement programs relating to industrial, aircraft, and community noise BACKGROUND: Wyle Laboratories, El Segundo, California. Participates in major field surveys involving environmental noise around civilian airports. HiShear Technology, Senior Ordnance Technician. Developed vibration capabilities and kept vibration laboratory Designed fixtures and tests for Titan IV high energy firing unit, power switch assembly for Lockheed Martin Aerospace. Ling Electronics Field service supervisor Directed, scheduled, as well as troubleshooting for the shaker manufacturer. Completed electromechanical work to China, Korea, Japan, and Australia Performed domestic work with all major American test houses. EDUCATION: B S , Industrial Management, California State University at Dominguez Hills, California, 1983 A A, Electronics Technology, El Camino College, Torrance, California, 1981. i e 252 4 PRIOR RELATED WYLE EXPERIENCE In 1983, Wyle's El Segundo staff were awarded a contract by the Los Angeles Department of Airports to conduct a new feasibility study of soundproofing dwellings around LAX. This study was based on Wyle's acoustical design computer model which included cost - effectiveness as a primary method of selecting noise reduction remedial options The study resulted in the development of a set of generalized specifications which could be applied to dwellings within each band of CNEL contours around LAX. These generalized specifications, or derivatives thereof, have been applied at LAX and at other airports throughout the US. They were subsequently adopted as part of the FAA/US Navy "Guidelines for the Sound Insulation of Residences Exposed to Aircraft Operations," DOT/FAA/PP -92 -5 4.1 FAA AIP Projects Table 4 -1 is a listing of AIP or similar projects which Wyle staff have supported in the Western states The residential protects have been primarily for cities close to • Los Angeles International Airport, • Sea -Tac International Airport, and • San Francisco International Airport Whereas the two latter airport programs are nearing completion, each having acoustically treated about 5,000 homes, the program for dwellings around LAX is still in its formative stage and will hopefully fulfill its obligations to the noise impacted residents within the next few years. The El Segundo program is, of course, part of that obligation and the recent completion of the 71- dwelling project provides an excellent basis for moving forward. The following project summaries are representative of subsequent projects in which Wyle staff have been instrumental in the development and implementation of airport sound insulation programs. They represent a wide range of responsibilities including overall project management, community outreach, acoustical and architectural design and construction management, noise monitoring, and project documentation duties according to each project's needs. Other projects for airport regions in the Eastern states are separately served by Wyle's staff in Arlington, Virginia 23 __di. Q .. 253 E- y c3 by a C E a� 0 a Q Q w a� U G v W v, U O ti O a >1 3 m a a v C n u J a a a u 0 K c y � nu �+ n e U o w Z 8 8 = $ 8 8 8 $ 8 G N u u N Y u Y O O Cl G C C O 01 yam+ y Q c C c C C e ` y O C O C O G C C yC pC v h m 16 m 1z. m r m r m r m r m m m w m o0 m o0 m C. m P m Z Z Z y Z ZNN p' pO VpO ��pO �prp �Npp NZ o L L' n [L a a e y u e u 0, O O 0 O y to !% n q U j U Q Q M N s s C n ea a O O a n n C t t t t t o u u E< E< u u h E' 2 c2 9 C m m F0 F9 F9 c c c [t n LL {L C Q Q e n u m u n u u u u sQ _� 3a V1 c e E OQ Vi. (% m a a v C n u J a a a u 0 K c y � nu �+ n e U o w Z 7 F E L bA O �i 7J O w d Q Q .c ai U C v a� a W Qi .y ti O A R U 3 9 m C a Q LL 3 c ea C u 7 n a at u X t Y a n U q � n U o w Z a 255 r � N N Pt A O m O m Y O m O m O m O m O O m O 6o O m O m O - - - ,5 - - �� - - - - y e O c C O C C O y c c 0 c C O e e 0 c G O e C O c C O e e 0 e G O c e 0 - e p 0 Vi O i0 9 A L 9 R 9 A 'O A 'O A 'Yp- ei 'O O 5 A 9 A v cJ 9 n U m y P P pN. Gn Q^ G O O O T c o Q o g o U f 2 z y p 2 2 2 g w — T an a c F L p o o Q E m Q a c u u u oQ oa oQ oQ ° o'Q w oa oQ oa E E E �E u- E �E u- G C G G C $ Y C n �L., C a`E f N Y Y Y 9 m C a Q LL 3 c ea C u 7 n a at u X t Y a n U q � n U o w Z a 255 \ \ § / \ E / ] \ < < ƒ \ % \ \ \ _ 3 �■ \ k � » \ }\ }\ /\ C4 }\ k $ ¢ k k ¢) ° k! A § ! - _ A � f f ƒ ) ) , § k k � \ § < < < $ f7 ! I7 $ !« !! ) 9A !� ƒ »SE Port of Seattle — Airport Noise Acoustical Evaluation Services (1985 -1988 and 1995) Wyle provided acoustical design consulting services to the Port of Seattle Noise Remedy Office in a pilot program applied to 28 dwellings in the SeaTac region. This successful pilot program was the forerunner to the current program which was directed toward completing approximately 5,000 dwellings in a 4 -year period Wyle provides acousucal consulting on an as- needed basis to this continuing program and in 1995 developed specialized sound insulation design computer programs for project acceleration purposes This project reached and exceeded its goal of 100 homes per month and is now in a wrap -up mode. Reference. Earl Mundy, Pon of Seattle, Tele: (206) 433 -7242 Orange County, California — Residential Sound Insulation Consulting Services (1986 - Ongoing) Wyle provides acoustical, architectural, and advisory services to the County of Orange for a Residential Sound Insulation Program near John Wayne Airport. This program requires Wyle to provide initial inspections of dwellings, preparation of specifications of sound insulation requirements, conduct pre- and post - modification sound insulation measurements, and supervise contractors in the application of sound insulation to each dwelling. Wyle was again selected in 1993 to continue these services which are presently ongoing at a rate of about 75 homes per year Reference Carl Braatz, John Wayne Airport, Tele: (949) 252 -5125 City of San Bruno — Aircraft Noise Insulation Project (in progress) Wyle provided acoustical design and consulting services to the City of San Bruno throughout the first seven completed phases of the FAA- and Airport- funded sound insulation program near San Francisco International Airport (SFO). These services included assisting the City staff and project coordinator throughout the early planning phases of the program and preparing design recommendations for each of the individual dwellings in each of the f project phases Wyle is currently completing sirmlar services for Airport- funded MOU -1, 2, and 3 Phases of the San Bruno program 27 r.na` im 257 Reference • George Foscardo, City of San Bruno, Tele: (415) 877 -8874 City of Millbrae — Sound Insulation Project (1987 -1997) Wyle was part of an implementation team, similar to that developed by the City of San Bruno, for the implementation of residential sound insulation projects in the City of Millbrae (SFO) Wyle staff have provided organizational and design consulting services throughout the first four phases of this AIP- sponsored program. As in the San Bruno program, Wyle conducted surveys of the project area, performed pre- and post - modification noise surveys and conducted inspection services on materials, products and control home implementation. Reference Gordon Hughan, City of Millbrae, Tele: (415) 259 -2431 County of San Mateo — unincorporated Country Club Park — Residential Noise Insulation Project (1994 -1998) Wyle was the acoustical consultant on this project for the County of San Mateo to apply sound insulation to 43 dwellings and four churches in an unincorporated area of the County and under the flight path from SFO airport runways 28L and 28R. In this project, Wyle worked closely with the local architectural firm of Beverly Prior Architects in preparing design plans, specifications and cost estimates. The first part of this project (37 dwellings) and the second part (six dwellings and four churches) have been successfully completed Reference David Carbone, Airport Planner, Dept, of Environmental Management, Tele- (415) 363 -1952 Tucson International Airport — Residential Project (1991 -1993) Wyle provided acoustical and architectural services for this program to Tucson, Arizona The Phase 1 pilot project included a permanently -based local Wyle project coordinator, Wyle El Segundo staff, and the Tucson architectural firm of ARCOS Architecture and Planning. The pilot phase, comprising 19 dwellings, was highly successful in achieving an average noise reduction improvement of 8 5 decibels for the 93 individual rooms modified in the project. A unique 28irr ?5P feature of this project was the modification of evaporative cooler systems for sound insulation purposes Reference Jill Merrick, Tucson Airport Authority, Tele: (602) 573 -8011 Ontario International Airport — Residential Sound Insulation Project (in progress) Wyle is providing acoustical design services for this program in Ontario, California. The program follows completion of a 226 - dwelling project and is one of the few residential sound insulation programs that is providing full air- conditioning for each dwelling. Reference: Sigmund Rivera, City of Ontario, Tele• (909) 391 -2515 City of Inglewood — Residential Projects (in progress) Wyle is providing consulting services to the City of Inglewood for the implementation of a sound insulation project on dwellings within the airport's 65 dB CNEL contour Wyle has provided assistance in preparing public announcements of the project, attending public meetings for potential participants, preparing architectural plans and specifications for contractor bid and inspection, and providing inspection services to the project. Reference Deanna Unternahrer, City of Inglewood, Tele. (310) 412 -5290 City of Fresno — Residential Sound Insulation Program (in progress) Wyle provided consulting services to the City of Fresno on three initial projects totaling 200 dwellings. Wyle was instrumental in transittoning the City's Department of Airports from their pilot program to a comprehensive sound insulation program. Wyle coordinates with three local architects and a San Francisco -based architect in this program. The current activity by Wyle staff mainly involves post - modification noise audits (measurements) in completed dwellings Reference Jerry Martinez, City of Fresno Dept of Airports, Tele (209) 498 -4102 29 i.n` ris 959 Los Angeles World Airports — L.A. City Residential Soundproofing Project (1994 -1999) Wyle was originally selected as the Acoustical Design Consultant to the City of Los Angeles in this program and was subsequently assigned to the LAWA Soundproofing Bureau for program continuation in 1997 Wyle is providing acoustical and architectural support to the program in developing plans and specifications, performing acoustical audits, and scheduling HazMat and reviews of the project with each homeowner Since 1997, Wyle has produced plans and specifications for more than 1,500 dwelling units in the LAWA program and has completed post - modification noise audits and final documentation for LAWA's Phasel and is currently active on dwellings within six other phases (areas) in LAWA's eight -phase program. Reference: Samson Mengistu, LAWA, Tele: (310) 646 -7444 4.2 El Segundo Projects Los Angeles International Airport — Validation Program for Sound Insulation of 20 Dwellings (1984 - 1985) This program was performed to determine and demonstrate the applicability of the generalized specifications for sound insulation of dwellings. In this program, the previously developed specifications were applied to 20 privately -owned dwellings around LAX, seven of which are in El Segundo Measurements of the pre - existing and post - modification sound insulation of each major room in each dwelling were obtained to assess the technical achievements of the program. The measured noise reductions in all 20 dwellings showed that the sound insulation objectives were met or exceeded for all of the 100 rooms modified in the project At the conclusion of the project, an opinion survey was administered to residents in each dwelling to identify the most prevalent problems caused by aircraft noise and the benefits subsequently achieved through the sound insulation project The majority of residents rated speech communication and their ability to listen to TV or radio as the most significant problem prior to the project. These residents stated "much improvement" in their living environment due to the sound insulation project, especially in the significant problem areas. co i.ee am ?60 Reference: Robert Beard, LAWA, Tele. (310) 646 -9410 Los Angeles International Airport — Sound Insulation Project for Insulation of 15 Single Family and 51 Multi - Family Dwelling Units (1987 -1990) Following the 1985 project near LAX, a three -stage follow -up program was initiated to include a significant number of multi - family dwelling units. This program included two apartment complexes in El Segundo comprising a total of 33 apartment units, and a complex in Lennox Significant design effort was involved in providing ventilation for the multi- family units due to the limited space available for equipment and ductwork. All surveyed tenants noted an improvement in their living environment due to the sound insulation modifications Reference • Robert Beard, LAWA, Tele. (310) 646 -9410 City of El Segundo — Sound Insulation Demonstration Home (1991 -1992) The City of El Segundo purchased a residence at 910 Hillcrest St. for the purpose of demonstrating methods of sound insulation This residence was modified under an FAA AIP Project Grant during 1992 and has been used for public meetings and display since that time. The primary modifications comprised replacement of windows and doors, addition of a secondary sliding glass door, addition of R -30 attic insulation and application of gypsum wallboard to the roof and wall structures in the most noise- exposed facades These modifications, together with other noise reduction actions for vents and grilles, resulted in all rooms being quietened to an interior CNEL level of 45 dB or less at a total construction cost of $37,800 The dwelling is located in the most severe aircraft noise residential area around LAX. Reference Harvey Holden, City of El Segundo, Tele: (310) 607 -2202 City of El Segundo — Residential Soundproofing Program (1995 - 1998) A project on 71 El Segundo dwellings has been recently completed with notable success in achieving the sound insulation goals of the FAA sponsored program. This project was unique in its voluntary participation protocol and met some delays in delivery of products to the homes, sufficient to ensure that changes will be applied to future phases In essence, the project proved 31 r.e� in ?61 that while the technical goals can be consistently achieved by the Wyle design methodology, the programmatic aspects of implementation by contractors and coordination with participant homeowners will require improvement in future phases. Reference: Harvey Holden, City of El Segundo, Tele. (310) 607 -2202 While the above example project experience by Wyle's El Segundo staff has been accumulated over a 15 -year period starting in 1985, Wyle's ability to support new programs and introduce new methods and product specifications is continually being expanded and developed by the introduction of new staff, updated software (e.g , CAD), efficiency reviews, and new program support policies Whereas in the earlier projects it was efficient and prudent to share resources among a number of simultaneous programs, the more labor- intensive of these programs will, in the future, have a dedicated staffing level as well as a shared (pooled) staffing level support The staff at Wyle Laboratories is pleased to be invited to subrmt this Proposal to the City of El Segundo and, as a long -time (50 years) member of the City's business community, ensures the City of its enthusiastic and professional services in this continuing program Wyle staff will be available to discuss this proposal with the City and provide enhancements and clarifications where necessary. 32 wyie 262 Selection Rating for Consultants Offering Architectural/Eneineering /Acoustic Services (September 1999) Excellent Fair Poor Wyle JP 5 4 3 2 1 I Quality of the Proposal Submitted a Organization b Readability — — — c Comprehensiveness — — — — — — — 1. 19 19 d. Appearance — — — _ _ 2. 20 20 Sub -Total = a " 16 16 55 55 2 Assessment of the consultant's understanding of the project and ability to successfully execute the Scope of Work. a Development of Spec's & Details and shop drawings — — — — — b Development of Plans — — — — — c Pre & Post - Construction Noise Surveys — — — — — d. Compliance wtth FAA Rags — — — — — e. Ability to respond to RFis — — — — — f. Ability to respond with technical assistance on short notice — g. Ability to oversee field work of Contractor on daily basis — — — — — h Ability to produce reports and work summaries that are accurate and clear — — — — — j Ability to verify supplied materials meet specifications — — — — — k Ability to conduct inspections of daily construction work for compliance with specifications 1 Ability to evaluate Contractor or Supplier recommendations and make recommendations to Project Manager — — — — m Ability to review Contractor & Supplier financial documents and establish validity — — — — — 1. 68 58 2. 71 48 Sub - Total= 3. 60 53 199 159 3 Evaluation of Firm's managerial and technical expertise a Assigned architect/engmeer is licensed in California* — — — — — b Consultant's supervisory staff appears to be adequate for the project c Consultant's experience in residential sound insulation programs is adequate — — — — — 1. 20 20 d. On -sne manager? — — — 2. 20 18 Sub - Total =_ . 16 15 56 48 Total atn 262 Notes I Bold — double points for on -site accessibility to Consultant Wyle 2 * = a requirement for the project b 3 3. 1., 2., and 3. represent the scores of each of the 3 proposal reviewers. 264 S V ti n N b _ 9 n° O 0\ ^ N N O V 4 w O m Ot m a D\ D• O. m a O b C V b O U Nlci u v O y N Q u V u Mj N •Vi a - a d u 0_0 0 o o 6 ¢ a` a` a` U ° a a a a � h ¢y w n w 1 y 66 o Ego � m ui) U y a h °a ° 3 B 'anO w z m w m W > m° n a m° 0 0 N v u v u v _ $ ..°aaw o O .a°, 14 A zl A U 9 V O r a1 s U 17 o 00 < ^ ti y m 264 a V ti _ 9 n° w V b O U O y N Q u V u Mj N •Vi a - d u 0_0 C 5° a w ¢ a` a` a` U q a a a a � h ¢y a a B a m W > a 0 v u v u v ..°aaw 264 a _ 9 n° w L b O U O y �> u a d u C 5° a w ¢ a` a` a` � a a a a � h ¢y a a a 0 ..°aaw Laibu O .a°, zl A U 9 V O r a1 U 264 RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM of EL SEGUNDO Phase 6 (June 1999) Who Can Participate in the Program? Anyone owning and residing in a home that hes within the 65 decibel Community Noise Equivalent Level noise contour surrounding Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and who is qualified to participate in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program is eligible to have that residential property insulated against Airport noise Please see the following pages for a map of the noise impact area and the qualifications to meet CDBG eligibility How does the Program Work? This is a passive program as far as El Segundo homeowners are concerned in that no action is required of homeowners until it is requested by the City. Typically, the FAA provides grants are for approximately one million dollars annually. The grant is called "80% money" as it covers only 80% of the cost of insulation The remaining 20 %, "20% money ", must be provided from other than Federal sources Upon being notified by the FAA that grant funds are available, the City prepares a plan based on the available grant finds and the City Council's instructions on the goals for the new program phase In the case of Phase 6, the FAA has authorized the City to conduct a "mini phase" using the balance of a previous grant In order to maximize the available FAA grant funds and existing CDBG grant funds the City Council has directed Staff to implement Phase 6, insulating 12 to 13 homes. What is the Normal Scope of Work in the RSI Program? The acoustical modifications performed on a given home will depend upon a number of factors including, the home's location and exposure to auport noise, the home's construction and age, the home's compliance with building codes, and the upgrades the home has already received Assuming a home is of 1950's construction and located in a high noise impact area, the following right be done to it I New acoustic windows and doors installed, 2 New ventilation system installed (assuming none already exists), 3 Interior walls thickened, or secondary interior walls added, 4 Secondary roof added, 5 Vents in attic and crawl spaces replaced with baffled vents, 6 Acoustic storm doors added; 7 Chimney damper and fireplace doors installed, 8 Roof vents acoustically capped, and 9 Bathroom vents installed What is the Impact of the Work Performed? The Costs Your home will become a construction site for approximately 15 days Sub - contractors will appear to come and go at will with no apparent rhyme or reason That is because construction is being conducted at several sites simultaneously You or your representative must be present during the construction phase of approximately 15 days. This can represent a financial hardship which must be considered when you are making the program participation decision. Representation for you is necessary to ensure someone who cares about what is happening to your house is present during the construction, offering suggestions, criticisms, and providing spot decisions when needed, and assisting in issue resolution. We request the contractors to contact homeowner to let him/her know when, during the 15 days, they will not be working This allows the homeowner to make productive use of that time However, even the most conscientious contractors may have great difficulty in doing this The principal reason for the difficulty is that his painting sub- contractor, carpenter, plumber, electrician, sheetrock installer, window installer, and chmmey sweep may all have conflicting priorities which must be resolved in order to create the daily work schedule Sometimes the conflicts are not well resolved The Benefits The bulk of the noise mtnsion in your house will be gone Your home will be more marketable than a smular home without RSI The value of your home will have been increased. To date, the County has not reassessed RSI program participant properties upward until post -sale On the national level, since program inception, the IRS has not treated RSI improvements as meome. ''65 The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The CDBG is a sub -set of the RSI program which exists to aid moderate to low income homeowners who wish to participate in the RSI program CDBG funds are received through the County to support a number of El Segundo community efforts including the RSI program At its meeting of 21 January 1998, following a presentation by the President of the Pacific Sands Homeowner's Association on the severe noise conditions impacting residents at 770 W Imperil Avenue, City Council stated that following the completion of Phase 5, it would consider allocating some CDBG funds to eligible homeowners at 770 W Imperial Avenue and others in the impacted area who may qualify for such funds As a follow -up, at its meeting of 2 February 1999, Council directed staff to make maximum use of available CDBG funds CDBG funds can only be used to cover all or part of the 20% funds not provided by the FAA There is a $4,000 cap on CDBG grants for any one condominium household, and a $6,500 cap on any single family home Any costs beyond the cap would be the program participant's responsibility To be eligible for receipt of CDBG grant funds for RSI treatment, a resident must meet the following cntena i Be an owner - occupant of a residence single family home, or condo, that is 2 Located within the 65dB CNEL noise contour surrounding LAX, and 3 Meet Section 8 income guidelines, provided in brief below Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Maximum Income 28,750 32,850 36,950 41,050 44,300 47,600 50,900 54,150 The applicant for CDBG grant funds must submit the following documents for the City to determine eligibility 1 City Application form, 2 Copy of deed showing proof of ownership of the property to receive RSI; 3 Copy of Federal income tax form 1040 or 1040A for the previous year, 2 years if applicant is self employed, 4 Copy of recent property tax bill, 5 Copy of recent payroll check stubs, Social Security checks, or other aid, pension, or retirement checks Additional items may be necessary if income from other sources appears on income tax forms, 6 Copy of recent utility bill, and, 7 Copy of photo identification such as a dri'ver's Homeowners who wish to be kept abreast of developments in the City's RSI program should call the program administrator, Harvey Holden, at (310) 607 -2202 to be placed on the mailing list for El Segundo's Residential Sound Insulation Program Newsletter -) Fi6 AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM This AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM ( "RSI Program ") is made and entered into this day of , 19_ by and among the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ( "City ") and (Please print RSI Program applicant's name ) The Owner owns property commonly referred to as ( "Owner ") (Street Address in El Segundo) The Owner's mailing address, if different from above, is (Street Address and City) The Owner's business telephone number is The Owner's home telephone number is SECTION 1. RECITALS I Effective April 13, 1985, the FAA approved the LAX Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program ( "LAX 150 NCP ") which enabled four jurisdictions, including the City of El Segundo, to become program sponsors and apply for FAA grants 2 Included in the LAX Part 150 NCP are approved noise mitigation programs aimed at converting incompatible land uses within the LAX airport noise impact area to compatible land use 3 Expenditure of the FAA monies is dependent upon the receipt and concurrent expenditure of matching funds, contributed by other sources through the jurisdiction sponsoring the program This source may be the program sponsor, some other agency source such as Community Development Block Grant CDBG funds, the recipient, or a combination of those sources The division of responsibility for funding is FAA grant = 80 %, and RSI program sponsor = 20% 4 The City seeks to implement its RSI program and provide for the use of FAA grant funds, and CDBG matching grant funds By this AGREEMENT, the Owner seeks to participate in the City's RSI program As such, pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth below, the Owner agrees to participate in the City's RSI Program . nrhongee 799 1 n C +7 5 The City acknowledges that it has hired the City's Airport Projects Administrator ( "APA ") to manage the program and a consultant to assist the City in the implementation of the City's RSI Program The consultant's duties include, but are not limited to, assisting in the recordation of acoustical and dimensional measurements, the preparation of plans and specifications for each Owner's property, acoustical installation training of contractors, and the approval of work performed by the contractors SECTION 2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING OF RSI PROGRAM By execution of this AGREEMENT, the Owner affirms that the Owner, or his /her representative, has personally participated in one or more program briefings /home visits, has received written program materials describing the program and associated responsibilities, and, acknowledges that the City's RSI Program, including the program process, procedures, and the responsibilities of the participant have been fully explained to the Owner and that all questions posed by the Owner have been answered to the Owner's satisfaction SECTION 3. STAGES OF RSI PROGRAM The City's RSI Program is to be completed in annual phases Each phase has several stages The initial stage requires technicians to enter the participant's home and record acoustical and dimensional measurements associated with the Owner's property The measurements collected will be used in the development of a site specific plan for the acoustical treatment of a participating residence Subsequent stages shall include, but are not limited to, the development of plans and specifications, solicitation and selection of contractors and suppliers, acquisition of materials, construction, and final approval During the initial, pre - construction phase an appointment shall be made with the Owner to permit the City's program agents to enter and record noise and structural information The dimensional and acoustical measurements taken will be used to develop a drawing, specifications, and a plan for the RSI treatment of the residence A second appointment will be made to present the site specific RSI plan to the Owner and acquire the Owner's permission to proceed with the plan SECTION 4. WITHDRAWAL FROM PARTICIPATION IN THE RSI PROGRAM The Owner is not required to participate in all stages of the City's RSI Program. However, the Owner acknowledges that the City may proceed with preparing plans and specifications, hiring a contractor(s), and ordering materials to make the approved acoustical improvements to the Owner's property through the execution of this AGREEMENT, and that execution of this AGREEMENT establishes the Owner's obligation to pay for materials ordered or work performed by the City's staff, consultant or contractor(s) should the Owner choose to terminate this AGREEMENT prior to completion of the RSI treatment c nvhwgrce 799 2 r) r SECTION 5. COST OF PARTICIPATION There is no cost to the homeowner for full participation in Phase 6 of the City's RSI program, nor is there a forefeiture of any property right or civil right There will be costs to the Owner associated with voluntary termination of program participation prior to completion of the RSI treatment, or City initiated termination of an Owner's participation in the program Typical costs for early termination are provided below Costs are cumulative 1 Upon receipt of the site specific plan $ 50000 2 Following entry into the bid process $ 50000 3 Upon production of materials Varies, but not less than $I 5 000 00 4 After construction has commenced Vanes, but not less than $15,00000 Total cost of terminating after construction has begun will be not less than $31,00000 At the end of the program phase, each Owner will be notified of the total cost for providing RSI treatment to his/her home, along with pre and post - construction acoustic measurements SECTION 6. CITY'S OBLIGATION TO PROCEED IS CONTINGENT UPON AVAILABLE FAA FUNDING AND CDBG FUNDS The City agrees to provide the RSI improvement as described more fully in the plans and specifications prepared for the Owner by the City's consultant The City's obligation to proceed with the RSI improvements is contingent upon available funding from the FAA and receipt of payment of matching funds from the County of Los Angeles through the CDBG program The execution of this AGREEMENT by the Owner does not guarantee immediate participation in the City's RSI Program The City will use its best efforts to sequence the construction of the RSI improvements in as equitable and expeditious a manner as sound program management allows However, it is within the sole discretion of the City to determine the sequence of construction of RSI improvements The Owner's narticination in the_Citv's RSi Program shall be at the sole discretion of the Citv and the Citv may at anv time, at its sole discretion, terminate this AGREEMENT. In the event of termination by the City of this AGREEMENT, the City shall provide the Owner an accounting of any monies spent on behalf of the Owner for materials used or labor provided, if any, for RSI improvements to the Owner's dwelling SECTION 7. NOTICE OF COMPLETION Upon completion of the improvements by the City's contractor(s), the City shall cause to be filed a Notice of Completion as to the RSI improvements to the Owner's dwelling The Notice is not a statement of comparability with airport operations n0102gee 799 3 11 RG SECTION 8. STRUCTURAL DEFECTS Should structural defects be discovered in a home at any time during the various stages of the RSI program treatment of the dwelling, which in the opinion of the City, based on consultation with the City's consultants and the contractors, indicates that such structural defects will interfere with the progress of the RSI improvements, the Owner agrees that it is his or her Q responsibility to perform any necessary maintenance, repairs or other structural corrections in order to prepare the dwelling for the continuance of the RSI improvements Structural defects include physical damage such as dry rot, termites, un- permitted construction, and building code violations of such seventy that in the opinion of the Project Manager they pose a threat to the building's occupants Should the Owner choose not to make the necessary structural repairs as requested by the City, the City may terminate the Owner's participation in the City's RSI Program If the City terminates the Owner's participation in the City's RSI program for the reason set forth above, the Owner is still obligated to pay for any materials ordered or used, or labor performed for the Owner's dwelling SECTION 9. ACCESS TO OWNER'S DWELLING The Owner agrees that he or she shall provide reasonable access to the Owner's dwelling to the City's employees, representatives, consultants and/or contractors for the purpose of performing the RSI improvements The Owner agrees that he or she, or a representative of the Owner, shall be present during the time in which the City's employees, representatives, consultants or contractors need access to the Owner,'s dwelling If the dwelling is a rental unit, the Owner of the dwelling(s) agrees that he or she shall make the necessary arrangements for reasonable access to each of the units SECTION 10. PROHIBITION AGAINST ADDITIONAL WORK During the period in which RSI improvements are made to the Owner's Dwelling, the Owner is prohibited from engaging any contractor, simultaneously with the RSI contractor, to perform additional work on the Owner's property without the City's prior written approval SECTION 11. INSPECTIONS The Owner agrees to permit inspections of the work performed by the City's consultant or contractor(s) These inspections shall be made by the City or its representatives, including the City's consultant, during the progress of the construction, ') 7n c m hoagee 799 The Owner further agrees to permit a final inspection of the dwelling by the City or its representatives, including the City's consultant, to determine if the work is acceptable to the Homeowner and to the City The Owner further agrees to permit, within 90 days of the filing of the "Notice of Completion" by the City, or as soon thereafter as possible, an inspection by the City or its representatives, including the City's consultant, to evaluate the installation of the RSI improvements SECTION 12. WARRANTIES AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING RSI IMPROVEMENTS The Citv provides no warranties of anv kind to anv participant in the RSi program for the materials provided nor for their installation. The City's material and installation specifications call for the following warranties from manufacturers Windows -------- - - - - -- 10 years Storm Doors ---- - - - - -- 5 years Sliding glass doors - -- 1 year Acoustic Doors - - - - - -- I year Electrical Devices - -- I year Mechanical Devices -- Iyear Installation ------ - - - - -- I year Manufacturers and installers are required to provide a copy of their warrantees to the Owner upon completion of RSI treatment It is the Owner's responsibility to request these materials from the installer Upon filing of the "Notice of Completion" by the City, the Owner shall assume responsibility for maintaining the RSI improvements This section is not intended to limit any rights of the Owner pursuant to law, including, but not limited to, any law concerning warranties This section is not intended to limit any rights of the Owner as made applicable by any contracts between the City and its consultant and /or contractors SECTION 13. ARBITRATION PROVISION Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the parties hereto agree that any claim or dispute between them ansing out of or relating to the terms of this Agreement shall be resolved by compulsory binding arbitration conducted by a retired Superior Court Judge of the state of California or other qualified person the parties mutually agree upon The claim or dispute being arbitrated shall be resolved in accordance with California law c ni hwgre, 799 -)7' The arbitration proceeding shall be governed by the laws and procedures governing civil judicial proceedings in this State Each party shall comply with all applicable laws relating to binding and compulsory arbitration, the directions given by the Arbitrator and the provisions of this Agreement The determinations made by the Arbitrator, if within the scope of the Arbitration and the Arbitrator's function shall be binding and conclusive on the parties and shall be enforceable in the manner provided by law The Arbitrator shall be selected in the following manner, I The party initiating the arbitration ( "Initiating Party ") shall prepare and submit to the other party a list ( "List ") containing the names of, not to exceed, three retired Superior Court fudges, all of whom the Initiating Party believes are qualified to serve as Arbitrator The names of the judges on the List shall be numbered consecutively 2 The party upon whom the List is served, within ten calendar days after service of the List, shall either A select one of the named retired judges to act as Arbitrator, in which case that retired judge shall serve as the Arbitrator, or B strike one name from the List 3 Upon expiration of said ten -day period, if no selection is made, the Arbitrator shall be the retired judge on the List with the lowest number next to his name, unless that fudge's name was stricken during the - ten -day period by the nominating Party By way of illustration, if the List served by the Initiating Party upon the other party has the names of three retired judges, A, B and C, numbered 1, 2 and 3, respectively, and number i is stricken, then B Number 2, shall be deemed for all purposes to be the selected Arbitrator 4 If, for any reason, the retired judge designated as the Arbitrator is unwilling or unable to serve as the Arbitrator, the judge on the List with the next lowest number whose name was not stricken shall be the Arbitrator In the event that none of the three retired fudges named on a List is willing or able to serve as the Arbitrator, the initiating Party shall prepare and submit a new List, containing the names of, not to exceed, three different retired fudges, and the above - described procedure shall be followed until an Arbitrator is selected Each party hereto shall pay one -half of the compensation to be paid to the Arbitrator, and except as otherwise expressly provided herein, each party shall bear its own cost and expense of arbitration, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees and related costs ?72 c d vhwgree 799 Homeowner's Permission to Proceed Authorization Homeowner's Name Project Property Description Mailing address if different Telephone numbers Home (include area code) (Please Print) (street address(es) (street, city, zip) Work I have indicated my full understanding of the City's plans to acoustically insulate my home by the placement of my initials adjacent to the conditions listed below Imtial I have been thoroughly briefed on the Program's process and procedures I have participated actively in the development of the acoustic modification plans for my home I fully understand and approve of the acoustic modifications that are planned for my home, and understand the limits to the scope of work I understand that this document is my authorization to the City to proceed with the insulation of my home in accordance with the plans I have approved I understand that the scope of this program does not include any direct cost to me I understand that this project does not depend on the City of Los Angeles, nor Los Angeles International Airport for support of any kind As a result, I have not had to forfeit any of my property, nor civil rights to any person, jurisdiction, or agency I agree to provide reasonable access to the property to be treated and I agree to be presence, or provide an authorized represedtative, during the planned construc- tion, and during visits by the consultant, contractor, or City representatives I shall permit such inspections of the RSI work done to my house as deemed necessary by the City during, and upon completion of that work I agree to perform any pre -work, identified by the City or its representative, to prepare my property for the RSI modifications If disputes arise regarding pre - work to be performed, the City Airport Project Administrator's decision is final Should structural shortcomings be discovered during installation of the RSI I agree to correct those shortcomings as directed by the City 7 73 Homeowner's Permission to Proceed Page 2 I understand that neither the City of El Segundo nor the Federal Government shall be responsible or liable for damage to property or injury to persons which may anse from, or be incident to, compliance with the conditions of this project The Contractors are required to carry workman's compensation and various liability insurance While this project is in progress, I agree not to engage any contractor in any additional work on the property named above without City approval I understand that I am responsible for maintaining the acoustic improvements provided by the City, and that my responsibility terminates upon the sale of my home, or twenty years from final acceptance of the RSI installation by the City, whichever occurs first I understand that the warrantee on construction against defects in materials, equipment and workmanship is limited to one year from date of completion I understand that material warranties against manufacturer's defects include the following 10 years for windows, 05 years for doors, and, 01 year for sliding glass doors, acoustic doors, electrical and mechanical devices I understand the limits of the City's obligations to me as a participant in the Program By this document, 1 authorize the City to order custom made materials, including but not limited to windows and doors If subsequently demand my removal from the Program, I understand that I am liable for all costs incurred u to o the time of my demand for removal from the Program If no materials have been ordered, my fiscal obligations are limited to any administrative costs incurred by the City I understand that any request for withdrawal from the program must be made in writing to the City Clerk By my signature below I certify that I approve the City's construction plans for acoustically treating my property, and authonze that construction Homeowner's Signature(s) Date Date "?Z i O CL Ili q WI O Z. cl W� U) W N O 4e.wi OAIt N W J W V 2 N O J LL r U 1 1 1 1 1 I e I of I m . i � � I 1 11 c N u 1S ffOYltll li ■Ol O QO 3 at M010111Nf.■ a a a a Al f.t11.f It .11100011.0 1 ..LOO.Ir It 1100300 1 �� O if .O.A)N �! O El 1f 0)111)0 i © YO ■01.0 NIM ��L�JjjJJJJ li OWLY.w ED ED tf ♦111101 N10 = ED li ♦YY )If 1t 1111)1 12 MO01311f LlE31 a ��j11i 11 ♦1120♦ I � 'lt OY.O11.LL 7 r >r li 111.11 i7 ® B� if OMOwM010 1r if OY07M00 Co I �e® if •IM 10 YEA 1 1 - �O® if ON wRol J if .3 PA .1101 I <- u u - e 1 Y : ■osY ; V o �S D a mm G��'l +pit♦ ' if if ]Y07bM 1 1 1 1 f 2 Q U ly _ U U. O ^75 a EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 3,199E AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: City Clerk Resolutions, calling for, requesting County Services for, and adopting regulations for Candidates Statement for, a Municipal Election, April 11, 2000 Discussion Read Resolutions by title only Adopt Resolutions The Municipal Election for three (3) Council members, City Treasurer, and City Clerk is to be held April 11, 2000 To proceed with the regulations set forth by the Government Code, these resolutions should be adopted before the opening of nominations beginning December 20, 1999 and ending January 14, 2000 (extended date January 19, 2000 if an incumbent does not file) Draft Resolutions calling the election Draft Resolution requesting County Services Draft Resolution adopting regulations for candidate statements Approved Resolution No 3950 Ordering Canvass Approved Resolution No 3964 Providing for tie vote Draft Election Calendar Amount Requested. $38,000 Account Number. 1302 Appropriation Required: NO Date: �/ 7, MO tb`se ''Clefl�« �Z, / REVIEWED BY- / Date. 15 ?76 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2000, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES. WHEREAS, under the provision of the laws relating to general law cities in the State of California a General Municipal Election shall be held on April 11, 2000, for the election of Municipal Officers NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS SECTION I That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of California relating to General Law Cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of El Segundo, California, on Tuesday, April 11, 2000, a general Municipal Election for the purpose of electing two Members of the City Council for the full term of four years SECTION 2 That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as required by law SECTION 3 That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election SECTION 4 That the polls for the election shall be open at seven o'clock A M of the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o'clock P M of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14401 of the Electrons Code of the State of California SECTION 5 That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections SECTION 6 That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, and manner as required by law SECTION 7 that the City Clerk shall certify to passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1999 Mike Gordon, Mayor of the City of El Segundo, California ATTESTED Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM ity Atto ?77 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the whole number of ;members of the City Council of the said City is five, that the foregoing resolution, being RESOLUTION NO. was duly passed an adopted by the said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of the said Council held on the 3d day of November, 1999, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote. AYES- Mayor Gordon, Mayor ProTem Jacobs, Council Members Wernick, Gaines, and McDowell NOES. None ABSENT. None ABSTENTION. None NOT PARTICIPATING. None WITNESS MY HAND THE OFFICAL SEAL OF SAID CITY this 3rd day of November, 1999, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk City of El Segundo, California, (seal) ?78 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR THE ELECTIVE OFFICES PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES' STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2000. WHEREAS, Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any local agency adopt regulations pertaining to material prepared by any candidate for a municipal election, including costs of the candidates statement NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate of elective office to be voted for at an Election to be held in the City of El Segundo, on April 14, 1998 may prepare a candidate's statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk The statement may include the name, age, occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate's education and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself The statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations The statement shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate's nomination papers are filed. The statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5.00 P.M of the next working day after the close of the nomination period SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall have translated and printed in the voters pamphlet only the candidates' statements of those candidates who request translation and printing. SECTION 3. No Candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the sample ballot package. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating and mailing the candidates statements filed pursuant to the Elections Code, and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance his or her pro rata share as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter's pamphlet The City Clerk shall bill each candidate for any cost in excess of the deposit or shall refund within 30 days of the election any unused portion of the deposit SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidates' representative a copy of this Resolution at the time the nomination petitions are issued. SECTION 6. That all previous resolutions establishing Council Policy on payment of candidates' statements are repealed. 279 SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THIS THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER 1999. Mike Gordon, Mayor City of El Segundo, California ATTESTED: Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk (SEAL) APP OVED AS TO FORM: r ity Atto CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the whole number of ,members of the City Council of the said City is five; that the foregoing resolution, being RESOLUTION NO. was duly passed an adopted by the said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of the said Council held on the 3'" day of November, 1999, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES Mayor Gordon, Mayor ProTem Jacobs, Council Members Wernick, Gaines, and McDowell NOES- None ABSENT. None ABSTENTION. None NOT PARTICIPATING: None WITNESS MY HAND THE OFFICAL SEAL OF SAID CITY this 3r° day of November, 1999 Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk City of Ell Segundo, California, (seal) 280 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2000 WHEREAS, a general Municipal Election a to be held in the City of El Segundo, Caldorua, on April 11, 2000, and WHEREAS, in the course of conduct of the election it is necessary for the City to request services of the County, and WHEREAS all necessary expenses in performing these services shall be paid by the City of El Segundo NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1 That pursuant to the provisions of Section 10002 of the Elections Code of the State of Califorma, this City Council requests the Board of Supervisors of the County to permit the County Election Department to prepare and furnish to the City for use in conducting the election the computer records of the names and addresses of all eligible registered voters in the City in order that the City may print labels to be attached to self -mailer sample ballot pamphlets, and will also furnish to the City printed indices of the voters to be used by the precinct board at the polling place, and will make available to the City additional election equipment and assistance according to state law SECTION 2 That the City shall reimburse the County for services performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the City of a properly approved bill SECTION 3 that the City Clerk is directed to forward without delay to the Board of Supervisors and to the County Election Department, each a certified copy of this resolution SECTION 4. that the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1999 Mike Gordon, Mayor of the City of El Segundo California APPROVED AS TO JFORM ATTESTED to�D City Attorney Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk 281 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) 1, Cindy Morlesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the whole number of ,members of the City Council of the said City is five, that the foregoing resolution, being RESOLUTION NO was duly passed an adopted by the said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of the said Council held on the Std day of November, 1999, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote* AYES Mayor Gordon, Mayor ProTem Jacobs, Council Members Wernick, Gaines, and McDowell NOES None ABSENT None ABSTENTION: None NOT PARTICIPATING None WITNESS MY HAND THE OFFICAL SEAL OF SAID CITY this V day of November, 1999 Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk City of El Segundo, California, (seal) 282 16 Schedule meeting of Council subcommittee to discuss noise provisions of the General Plan. Recommendation — Schedule meeting date. ?8:16