The URL can be used to link to this page

1998 JUL 21 CC PACKETAGENDA f EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items. The Public can participate in the discussion of any item listed on the Agenda. To facilitate your presentation, please place a check mark ./beside each item you would like to address on the Agenda provided by the City Clerk, preferably PRIOR to the start of the meeting. Any other item not listed on the Agenda that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council may be directly addressed during Public Communications. Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and give: Your name and address and the organization you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits. Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2:00 p.m. the prior Tuesday). The request must include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 607 -2208. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 21, 1998 - 5:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Pro Tern Sandra Jacobs ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total.) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council oil behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. CLOSED SESSION: The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, et sew.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation; and /or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel); and /or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as follows: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a)) - 1. In the Matter of the Application of City of Los Angeles, OAH No. L- 9604014 2. Hill v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 030986 3. Hughes v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. BC 185210 4. Senior v. City of El Segundo, WCAB Unassigned 5. Mosleh & Greffon v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 025903 6. Fenwick v. Civil Service Commission and City of El Segundo, 2 Civil B 121282 and Los Angeles No. BSO44667. 7. El Segundo v. Kilroy, LASC Case No. YC 031166 07- 21- 98.5pm CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(b): -2- potential case (no further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c): -6- matters. DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) - Status of City Manager recruitment. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957.6) - Meet with negotiator for the General Employees Association (El Segundo City Employees Association). CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) - None. REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required) PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: DATE TIME NAME 2 07- 21- 98.5pm AGENDA EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items. The Public can participate in the discussion of any item listed on the Agenda. To facilitate your presentation, please place a check mark ✓ beside each item you would like to address on the Agenda provided by the City Clerk, preferably PRIOR to the start of the meeting. Any other item not listed on the Agenda that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council may be directly addressed during Public Communications. Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and give: Your name and address and the organization you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits. Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2:00 p.m. the prior Tuesday). The request must include a brief aeneral clescrintion of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact L'ity Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 21,1998 - 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION - Rev. Julie Elkins, United Methodist Church of El Segundo PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Pro Tem Sandra Jacobs PRESENTATIONS k, 607 Next Resolution # 4077 Next Ordinance # 1288 1. Acceptance of resignation of Susan Cooper as City Treasurer and appointment of William Bue as City Treasurer to fill the vacancy until the next election in April 2000. Recommendation - Acceptance of resignation and administration of oath of office to William Bue, the new City Treasurer. ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to Cif Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only. Recommendation - Approval. B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS - Public Hearing on Environmental Assessment EA -439 and Subdivision Extension 98 -2 for a one (1) year extension to a previously approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map for a 28 -unit condominium project to be constructed at 1415 East Grand Avenue. Applicant: Jim Kizirian. Recommendation - 1) Open public hearing; 2) Council discussion; 3) Reading of Resolution by title only; and, 4) By motion, Adopt Resolution approving the Subdivision extension. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - Additional discussion concerning �purchase of trash cans for placement on Main Street. Recommendation - For uniformity, capacity and increased coverage, select Option 1: Purchase 30 new 42 gallon (31 gallon interior) cans and relocate the old, still usable cans to other locations throughout the City. D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - Schedule interviews of candidates for Planning Commission and Community Cable Advisory Committee ( "CCBs "), with filing deadline set for 48 hours prior to interviews. Recommendation - Set date of interviews for 6:30 p.m., Tuesday, August 4, 1998. 2. Appoint a Senior Taskforce to develop recommendations for the City Council on how to assist El Se undo seniors. Recommendation - Discussion and possible action. 3. Appoint a Business Taskforce to study audit procedures for the City's collection of business related taxes. Recommendation - Discussion and possible action. 1, o E. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business. Warrant Numbers 248635- 248869 on Demand Register Summary Number 29 in total amount of $1,426,357.03, Warrant Numbers 248873 - 249071 on Demand Register Summary Number O1 in total amount of $511,427.50. and Wire Transfers in the amount of $947.012.44. Recommendation - Approve Warrant Demand Register and Authorize staff to release. Ratify: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or agreements; emergency disbursements and /or adjustments; and wire transfers from 07/01/98 to 07/14/98. 2. City Council meeting minutes of June 30 July 7 and July 9 1998. Recommendation - Approval. 3. Acceptance off the re- roofing of various City buildings (PW 97 -16). Final contract amount = $71,732.00. - Recommendation - 1) Approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $3,590.00. 2) Accept the work as complete. 3) Authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's Office. 4. Acceptance of the project to install safety deck surfacing in the City Plunge - Project No. PW 97-23. (Final contract amount = $21.785.00). Recommendation - 1) Accept the work as complete. 2) Authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's Office. Award contract to John T. Malloy, Inc., for the 1997 -98 replacement of water mains - Project No PW 97-15 (contract amount $267,072.90). Recommendation - 1) Award contract to the lowest responsible bidder John T. Malloy, Inc. in the amount of $267,072.90. 2) Authorize the Mayor to sign the standard public works construction agreement after approval as to form by the City Attorney. 6. Request for approval to submit an application for a Bureau of Justice Assistance Local Law Enforcement Block Grant requesting $18,640 in grant funding with a $1,864 cash match from Asset Forfeiture funds. Recommendation - Approve request. 7 The destruction of identified records in accordance with the provisions of Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California. The City Attorney has consented to the plan for records destruction. Recommendation - Approve Resolution authorizing the destruction of certain records. CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA F. NEW BUSINESS - CITY MANAGER - 1. Presentation regarding airport master flan opposition strategy. Recommendation - Discussion and file report. G. NEW BUSINESS - CITY ATTORNEY - NONE H. NEW BUSINESS - CITY CLERK - NONE I. NEW BUSINESS - CITY TREASURER - NONE J. NEW BUSINESS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCILMEMBERS Councilmember McDowell - NONE Councilmember Gaines - NONE - Councilmember Wernick - NONE Mayor Pro Tem Jacobs - NONE Mayor Gordon - Ask the Parks and Recreation Department to develop a plan to build a dog park within the city limits. Recommendation - Discussion and possible action. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals Who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. MEMORIALS CLOSED SESSION The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code Sec. 54960, et 5.q q.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or discussing matters covered under Government Code section 54957 (Personnel); and /or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators; as follows: Continuation of matters listed on the City Council Agenda for 5:00 p.m., July 21, 1998 under "Closed Session" (if needed). REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required) ADJOURNMENT POSTED: DATE: 4/ TIME: NAME: 07- 21 -98.ag EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 21, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Special Order of Business - Public Hearing AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Public Hearing on Environmental Assessment EA -439 and Subdivision Extension 98 -2 for a one (1) year extension to a previously approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map for a 28 -unit condominium project to be constructed at 1415 East Grand Avenue. Applicant: Jim Kizirian. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1) Open public hearing; 2) Council discussion; 3) Reading of Resolution by title only; and, 4) By motion, Adopt Resolution approving the Subdivision extension. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The Planning Division received the above referenced application on March 30, 1998. The application requests City Council approval of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for Environmental Assessment (EA -439) and adoption of an extension to Vesting Tentative Map No. 51109 for one year. The project was originally approved by the City Council on May 4, 1993, and is valid through May 4, 1998. Pursuant to City policy, the Vesting Tentative Map approval is automatically extended during the processing of the extension, as the incomplete request was submitted on March 30, 1998, prior to the expiration date of the map. Pursuant to City requirements, the body approving the original project (City Council) must also approve any modifications to the project. The extension, if granted, will also apply to the other project approvals (SHSP 92 -1). No changes in the project are proposed. DISCUSSION: On July 9, 1998, the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing, reviewed the facts and findings related to Environmental Assessment EA- 439 and Subdivision Extension 98 -2, and adopted Resolution No. 2421. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2421 recommends that the City Council Approve EA -439 and SUB 98 -2. A more complete project description, analysis, and background information, is included in the accompanying Planning Commission Staff Report and its attachments, which were previously distributed to the City Council on July 2, 1998; and, are again included as an attachment to this Report. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. (draft) City Council Resolution No. 2. (adopted) Planning Commission Resolution No. 2421. 3. (draft) Planning Commission Minutes; July 9, 1998. 4. Planning Commission Staff Report and Attachments; July 9, 1998. FISCAL IMPACT: None ORIGINATED: Date: 9 July 1998 Bret B Bernard, AICP, Director of Planning and Building Safety REVIEWED BY: Date: T ri mond, Actin Cit ana er 7/ 9 ACTIO AKEN: p: \projects \426 - 450 \ea439 \ea439.ais f1,00 0r DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ONE (1) YEAR EXTENSION TO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51109 (SUBDIVISION 98 -2) FOR PROPERTY AT 1415 EAST GRAND AVENUE AND CERTIFICATION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA -439. PETITIONED BY JIM KIZIRIAN. WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jim Kizirian, requesting approval of an Environmental Assessment and a one (1) year extension to Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51109, and associated project approvals to allow the continued development rights for the construction of a 28 unit townhome style condominium development on 1.59 acres located at 1415 East Grand Avenue in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) Overlay Zone; and, WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment (EA -439), including a Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for the proposed use, has been prepared and circulated to all interested parties and Staff, for review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and supporting evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act, State CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No. 3805); and , WHEREAS, on July 9, 1998, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law; and the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2421 on July 9, 1998 recommending approval of the proposed Subdivision extension; and, WHEREAS, on July 21, 1998, the City Council did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law; and, WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against the findings of Environmental Assessment EA -439 and Subdivision Extension 98 -2; and, WHEREAS, at said hearings the following facts were established: 1. The approved project is for the construction of a 28 unit townhouse -style condominium project at a density of 17.6 units per acre with 84 garage parking spaces and 9 guest parking spaces on a 1.59 acre site at 1415 E. Grand Avenue in the Medium Manufacturing (M -M) zone. 2. The approved project includes the implementation of the Medium Density Residential (MDR) Floating Zone in the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan area, which required City Council approval and certification of an Environmental Impact Report. 3. The approved proposal complies with all applicable requirements of the Medium Density Residential (MDR) Floating Zone. 4. The subject proposal is to extend the previously approved project, covered by the following previous approvals and agreements: � o LI Environmental Assessment EA -285, Subdivision 92 -3, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51109, and Smoky Hollow Site Plan 92 -1 were approved by City Council Resolution No. 3811 on May 4, 1993, certifying a Environmental Impact Report for a 28 unit condominium project at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Kansas Street (1415 East Grand Avenue). The original Vesting Tentative Tract Map was approved for a period of two years. State Law (Senate Bill 428) adopted in 1993 provided for an automatic two year extension of tentative tract maps which had not expired by September 13, 1993. Assembly Bill 771, which was signed into law on May 15, 1996, also provided for an additional one year automatic extension of tentative maps in effect at the time of passage of the law. These two laws, combined with the original two year approval, extended the expiration date of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51109 to May 4, 1998. 6. The proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with State guidelines and local requirements, a Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration was prepared and circulated for public and interdepartmental review. No significant adverse impacts were identified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after considering the above facts and study of proposed Environmental Assessment EA-439 and Subdivision Extension 98 -2, the City Council makes the following findings and approves a one (1) year extension to the original Vesting Tentative Tract Map and certifies the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1. The Draft Initial Study was made available for public review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law. The Initial Study concluded that the proposed project will not have a significant, adverse effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact will be prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and 2. That when considering the whole record, there is no evidence that the project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends, because the project is in a built - out urban environment; and 3. That the City Council authorizes and directs the Director of Planning and Building Safety to file with the appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and de minimis finding pursuant to AB 3158 and the California Code of Regulations. Within ten (10) days of the approval of the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts, the applicant shall submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of $25.00 required by the County of Los Angeles for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of Determination. As approved in AB 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA will not be met and no vesting shall occur until this condition is met and the required notices and fees are filed with the County. The approved subdivision to create condominium ownership, and the design of the proposed townhouse -style multiple - family residences are consistent with the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan through the activation of the Medium Density Residential (MDR) Floating Zone. 2. The site is physically suitable for residential townhouse development at the proposed density of one unit per 2,474 square feet of site area (28 units or 17.6 units per acre). 2 0001() 2. The site is physically suitable for residential townhouse development at the proposed density of one unit per 2,474 square feet of site area (28 units or 17.6 units per acre). The design of the approved subdivision improvements adequately provides for public services and is not likely to cause any public health problems due to the mitigation measures provided for in the certified Environmental Impact Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council approves Environmental Assessment EA -439 and Subdivision Extension 98 -2, subject to the following conditions: 1. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51109 and associated project entitlements shall expire on May 4, 1999, unless a final map is approved or another extension is requested. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall pay traffic impact mitigation fees, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 3969. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide Reclaimed Water System Plans to the City of El Segundo Departments of Planning and Building Safety, and Public Works for review and approval. The plans shall indicate reclaimed water to be utilized in the irrigation systems for all landscape areas and other uses, as approved by the Los Angeles County Health Department and the City Department of Public Works. If necessary, said plans shall include an approval from West Basin Municipal Water District, the supplier of reclaimed water systems. If the water provider is unable to make reclaimed water available for the project prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, then potable water. may be utilized until such time as reclaimed water is available. As soon as reclaimed water is available, then it shall be utilized. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall develop plans which indicate that the project is in substantial conformance with plans approved and on file with the Department of Planning and Building Safety. Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred to the Director of Planning and Building Safety for a determination regarding the need for Planning Commission review of the proposed modification. 5. The developer shall develop the property in accordance with the applicable provisions of previously approved City Council Resolution No. 3811. 6. The applicant shall indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees from and against any all claim, actions, causes of action, proceedings or suits which challenge or attack the validity of the City's approval of Environmental Assessment EA -439 and Subdivision Extension 98 -2. G 0 0 1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1998. Mike Gordon, Mayor ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 21" day of July, 1998, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney 4 p: \project \426- 450 \ea439 \ea439 - cc.res 0001 RESOLUTION NO. 2421 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ONE (1) YEAR EXTENSION TO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51109 (SUBDIVISION 98 -2) FOR PROPERTY AT 1415 EAST GRAND AVENUE AND CERTIFICATION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA. 439. PETITIONED BY JIM KIZIRIAN. WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jim Kizirian, requesting approval of an Environmental Assessment and a one (1) year extension to Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51109, and associated project approvals to allow the continued development rights for the construction of a 28 unit townhome style condominium development on 1.59 acres located at 1415 East Grand Avenue in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) Overlay Zone; and, WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment (EA -439), including a Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for the proposed use, has been prepared and circulated to all interested parties and Staff, for review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and supporting evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act, State CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No. 3805); and, WHEREAS, on July 9, 1998, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given'in the time, form and manner prescribed by law; and, WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against the findings of Environmental Assessment EA-439 and Subdivision Extension 98 -2; and, WHEREAS, at said hearing the following facts were established: 1. The approved project is for the construction of a 28 unit townhouse -style condominium project at a density of 17.6 units per acre with 84 garage parking spaces and 9 guest parking spaces on a 1.59 acre site at 1415 E. Grand Avenue in the Medium Manufacturing (M -M) zone. 2. The approved project includes the implementation of the Medium Density Residential (MDR) Floating Zone in the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan area, which required City Council approval and certification of an Environmental Impact Report. 3. The approved proposal complies with all applicable requirements of the Medium Density Residential (MDR) Floating Zone. 4. The subject proposal is to extend the previously approved project, covered by the following previous approvals and agreements: * Environmental Assessment EA -285, Subdivision 92 -3, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51109, and Smoky Hollow Site Plan 92 -1 were approved by City Council Resolution No. 3811 on May 4, 1993, certifying a Environmental Impact Report for a 28 unit condominium project at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Kansas Street (1415 East Grand Avenue). 6101J. 13 5. The original Vesting Tentative Tract Map was approved for a period of two years. State Law (Senate Bill 428) adopted in 1993 provided for an automatic two year extension of tentative tract maps which had not expired by September 13, 1993. Assembly Bill 771, which was signed into law on May 15, 1996, also provided for an additional one year automatic extension of tentative maps in effect at the time of passage of the law. These two laws, combined with the original two year approval, extended the expiration date of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51109 to May 4, 1998. 6. The proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with State guidelines and local requirements, a Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration was prepared and circulated for public and interdepartmental review. No significant adverse impacts were identified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after considering the above facts and study of proposed Environmental Assessment EA-439 and Subdivision Extension 98 -2, the Planning Commission makes the following findings and recommends the City Council approve a one (1) year extension to the original Vesting Tentative Tract Map and certify the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1. The Draft Initial Study was made available for public review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law. The Initial Study concluded that the proposed project will not have a significant, adverse effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact will be prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and 2. That when considering the whole record, there is no evidence that the project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends, because the project is in a built - out urban environment; and That the Planning Commission thereby recommends that the City Council authorize and direct the Director of Planning and Building Safety to file with the appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and de minimis finding pursuant to AB 3158 and the California Code of Regulations. Within ten (10) days of the approval of the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts, the applicant shall submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of $25.00 required by the County of Los Angeles for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of Determination. As approved in AB 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA will not be met and no vesting shall occur until this condition is met and the required notices and fees are filed with the County. SUBDIVISION 1. The approved subdivision to create condominium ownership, and the design of the proposed townhouse -style multiple- family residences are consistent with the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan through the activation of the Medium Density Residential (MDR) Floating Zone. 2. The site is physically suitable for residential townhouse development at the proposed density of one unit per 2,474 square feet of site area (28 units or 17.6 units per acre). 3. The design of the approved subdivision improvements adequately provides for public services and is not likely to cause any public health problems due to the mitigation measures provided for in the certified Environmental Impact Report. 2 001 1I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Environmental Assessment EA -439 and Subdivision Extension 98 -2, subject to the following conditions: 1. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51109 and associated project entitlements shall expire on May 4, 1999, unless a final map is approved or another extension is requested. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall pay traffic impact mitigation fees, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 3969. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide Reclaimed Water System Plans to the City of El Segundo Departments of Planning and Building Safety, and Public Works for review and approval. The plans shall indicate reclaimed water to be utilized in the irrigation systems for all landscape areas and other uses, as approved by the Los Angeles County Health Department and the City Department of Public Works. If necessary, said plans shall include an approval from West Basin Municipal Water District, the supplier of reclaimed water systems. If the water provider is unable to make reclaimed water available for the project prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, then potable water may be utilized until such time as reclaimed water is available. As soon as reclaimed water is available, then it shall be utilized. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall develop plans which indicate that the project is in substantial conformance with plans approved and on file with the Department of Planning and Building Safety. Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred to the Director of Planning and Building Safety for a determination regarding the need for Planning Commission review of the proposed modification. 5. The developer shall develop the property in accordance with the applicable provisions of previously approved City Council Resolution No. 3811. 6. The applicant shall indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees from and against any all claim, actions, causes of action, proceedings or suits which challenge or attack the validity of the City's approval of Environmental Assessment EA-439 and Subdivision Extension 98 -2. Bret B. a d, CP, annXg, Director of l and Building Safety, and Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo, California Crowley (Chairman) - Wycoff (Vice - Chairman) - Boulgarides - O'Brien - Palmer - PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this-2.9L day of July. 1998— Brian Crowley, Chairman of the Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo, California p: \project\426- 450\ea439\ea439.res 0 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION O OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA July 9,1998 �� Chairman Crowley called the regular meeting of the El Segundo Planning Commissio CALL TO ORDER order at 7:05 P.M. in the Council Chamber of the City of El Segundo City Hall M treet, El Segundo, California. Vice -Chaff scoff led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PLEDGE TO FLAG PENT: O'HE %presented CROWLEY, PALMER, GARIDES (Excused ROLL CALL Absence). Chairman Crowleems on the C/00� lend er. CONSENT CALENDER Item A, the May 28, 1998 Minutes Nke p re ted. On page 4, fourth paragraph down, Chairman Crowley would like wording ed to state as follows: "Chairman Crowley asked if there was anything in the Res \edn to the building across the street at 870 South Nash Street, since the solufers to it." Vice -Chair Wycoff mov to accept the as amended. Commissioner MOTION O' Hearn seconded. P sed 4 -0. Item B, Gene an Consistency Findined next. ommissioner Palmer asked why item is before th em. Dirstated it m come before the Plannin ommission by State law. Cuidrman Crowley moved to accept Item B. Commissioner O'Hearn secondePassed MOTION Environmental Assessment EA -439, Subdivision 98 -2, Address: 1415 East Grand EA -439 Avenue, Applicant and Property Owner: Jim Kizirian, was presented next. Ms. Jester presented the Staff Report as outlined in the Agenda Packet. Mr. Cheledon stated there's a specific section in the Subdivision Map Act that relates to Vesting Tentative Maps and provides the discretion of the Planning Commission to either deny or condition an extension to the Vesting Tentative Map. It is limited to only two circumstances: When a condition is required to comply with the requirement of federal or state law, and when a new condition is required because there's a public health and safety threat to the immediate surrounding neighborhood. The conditions that are proposed tonight only clarify conditions that were initially placed on the property at the time of the initial approval. Commissioner O'Heam asked if there are plans on file for what type of buildings that are going to be built? Could the building permit be able to require changes that have occurred in the last five years be incorporated into those plans? Ms. Jester stated the plans that are on file are the plans on the wall. They have not been submitted to the Building Safety Division for plan check. This is one area where vesting map does not vest your right under the old 1993 Uniform Building, Plumbing, and Mechanical Codes. You must comply with the current codes. This is also the same for development agreements. 07- 09- 98.min Mr. Cheledon stated it is a subsequent permit to the permit that's before the Commission tonight. Mr. Bernard stated they must be in substantial conformance with those plans that "R4 have been vested but at the same time the technical drawings are yet to be submitted and permits will be issued once they're submitted in plan check. F r Commissioner Palmer asked if the parking was already adequate? Ms. Jester stated the developer planned and accommodated for three car garages in all of the units. Vice-Chair Wycoff asked when the plans were drawn up and if they're not submitted, are they still valid? Ms. Jester stated they are the plans from 1993, the original application. They are valid from a Planning standpoint, but they have not yet drawn the construction drawings that are required for Building and Safety. Permits have not been issued yet. Vice -Chair Wycoff asked about Condition #1 if the date of May 4, 1999 would stay the same if a final map is approved or another extension is requested? Ms. Jester stated this date was specifically put in to clarify this since the Planning Commission's action will be after this date. Staff took it from a year from when it would have expired. This is considered a project under CEQA and that's why the Planning Commission is required to review it with a Negative Declaration. Staff did not feel that they could do it with an exemption. The extension itself is what the Negative Declaration is for, not the entire project. The entire project was approved already with an Environmental Impact Report. Chairman Crowley asked about the hookup to reclaimed water supply and if there is a pipe in the vicinity that can be tapped into? Ms. Jester stated she believes the closest pipeline may be in El Segundo Boulevard. Once a project is approved, the developer submits preliminary plans to West Basin. West Basin will then budget for that line extension and then install the extension themselves up to the property. The developer is then responsible from there. Chairman Crowley stated on Page 2 of the Negative Declaration, regarding the approved project to the north, the approval has expired. He stated there could be an MDR built to the north under current rules but the old design that was originally approved is no longer valid. Ms. Jester stated they will change the language on Page 2 stating it is no longer an approved project to the north. For information, MDR is an acronym for Medium Density Residential. Elizabeth Srour, 1001 6th Street, Manhattan Beach PUBLIC COMMENTS She is representing the applicant and property owner, Jim Kizirian. She is requesting the extension for one year for the Vesting Tentative Tract Map. They have been working with staff closely to come to an understanding of what the process would be and are aware of the reasons for this hearing and the analysis that staff has prepared including the two conditions. The architect for this project was not available this evening. In the original approval by City Council and Planning Commission, it was found that this proposal was a very sensible decision with regard to the relationship of this proposed project and the adjacent land uses. The access relationship to the streets and other issues were also addressed pertaining to the neighborhood. It was found consistent with the pattern of transition in the area and with the goals, policies and objectives of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan. She and the property owner agrees to the conditions and hopes for approval of this project. Commissioner O'Hearn asked what the probability of development will be? Ms. Srour stated Mr. Kizirian has already submitted his final map to the County Engineer and has 0'J _l " 07- 09- 9g.min made a commitment to moving forward with the project. Because of the size of the project and complexity, there are many components that have to be balanced including the approval of the recordation of the Map. This process itself with the County takes time and O funds. It was not possible to have the map recorded by the May expiration date. s drawn u and read to o once the Vice -Chair Wycoff asked if there are current plan p Y g r County gives the approval? Ms. Srour stated Mr. Kizirian is working with his architect, Douglas Leach and she is not sure how close they are in terms of the construction drawings. There is a time line that is set in place by the Code and by the Subdivision Map Act. Building Codes must be met at the time of submittal. Vice -Chair Wycoff asked if the current plans follow the drawings? Ms. Srour stated yes, the conceptual plans before the Commission do regulate the development that will come before the building official and if there is any deviation from that, the staff is charged with evaluating that and bringing it to the Commission's attention. The Staff Report from 1993 is included in the packet and it makes it clear that this project was far in excess of the basic standards at that time. Chairman Crowley stated he reviewed this as a Planning Commissioner in 1993 and they sent the architect back to the drawing board and he came up with this plan which meets all the original requirements. It didn't require any variances at the time. It meets the density requirements. It was estimated back in 1993 to generate revenues of $15,500 but the costs annually for services would create approximately $47,200. Commissioner O'Hearn moved that they approve this Resolution recommending to the MOTION City Council approval of the extension of the Vesting Tentative Map until May 4, 1999 and also adopting the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts. Commissioner Palmer seconded. Passed 4-0. Ms. Jester stated this will go before the City Council on July 21, 1998. Chairman Crowley presented EA-428 and Precise Plat--- - .Address: East Imperial Imperial Highway. Applicant: Hughes Aircraft Corporation. The applicant has EA -428 reque to continue the public hearing until August 13, 1998. Chairman Crow oved to continue. Vice -Chair Wycoff seconded. Passed 4 -0. MOTION Director Bernard stated the ncil had appointed another Planning Commissio o fill the fifth position, Mr. Jerry Pre ' o, but was forced to resign before h k his seat REPORT because of professional responsibi i He is moving to Fresn tall appreciates FROM Commissioner O'Hearn's continued co nt and voluntee ' o remain on the Body DIRECTOR until a new person has been appointed. At the last Council Meeting Mr. Gaines stat at th nutes of Diane Cleary, the Minutes Secretary, were noted for their cl ' and extensive '1 and she was thanked by the Council. Commissioner O'Hearn sta a didn't continue with the Planning Commi . n because COMMENTS he is also a member of 1 Segundo Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement mittee and is also on s Angeles Airport Area Advisory Committee. Both o se FROM COMMISSION committees re a lot of work as well as the Planning Commission. He felt he cou be of be se to the City because of the LAX expansion efforts to concentrate in this area erving on the Planning Commission is a responsibility and is interesting and he is to challenge the audience to put their application in and give the City Council the 07- 09- 98.min 3 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INTERDEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE MEETING DATE: July 9, 1998 TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission 3 FROM: Bret B. Bernard, Director of Planning and Building Safety 'j THROUGH: Laurie B. Jester, Senior Planner It STAFF PLANNER: Paul Garry, Assistant Planner )061- SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment EA -439 Subdivision 98-2 Extension of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51109, Smoky Hollow Site Plan SHSP 92 -1 for 28 Unit Condominium Project Address: 1415 East Grand Avenue Applicant and Property Owner: Jim Kizirian The proposed project is a request for a one (1) year extension to a previously approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map for a 28 -unit condominium project to be constructed at 1415 East Grand Avenue. The purpose of the extension is to allow additional time for the development of the project. The project was originally approved by the City Council on May 4,1993 and is valid through May 4, 1998. Pursuant to City policy, the Vesting Tentative Map approval is automatically extended during the processing of the extension, as the request was submitted on March 30, 1998, prior to the expiration date of the map. The extension, if granted, will also apply to the other project approvals (SHSP 92 -1). No changes in the project are proposed. The Planning staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2421 recommending that the City Council approve Environmental Assessment EA -439 and Subdivision 98 -2 (Extension); and, find that there are no potential environmental impacts created by the project. The Staff report prepared on April 8, 1993 for approval of the original project (attached) by the Planning Commission provides a detailed background of the prior approvals and other documents which have been developed to implement the overall project. 00919 The proposed project is the one year extension of a previously approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map and associated approvals for the construction of a 28 -unit townhouse -style condominium at 1415 East Grand Avenue. The purpose of the extension is to allow additional time for the development of the project. The approved project is composed of five separate buildings. The 28 condominiums consist of two unit designs with 1844 -1851 square feet of living area, a ground floor enclosed patio, three different balconies, plus a three (3) car garage. Each unit consists of three (3) levels with a three car garage on the semi - subterranean bottom level, kitchen and living areas on the second level, and bedrooms on the third level. Nine visitor parking spaces, two trash enclosures, and an outdoor swimming pool with poolhouse are proposed on the lot. The original application included a request to activate the "floating" Medium Density Residential (MDR) Zone for the site (SHSP 92 -1). The project also included an application for condominium ownership (Subdivision 92- 3/Vesting Tentative Tract Map 51109). As part of the City's review of the request to activate the "floating" Medium Density Residential Zone, a focused Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared to address land use, transportation/circulation, utilities, noise, and air quality. The SEIR was certified by the City Council on May 4, 1993. The approved project site is located on the northwest comer of Grand Avenue and Kansas Street in the Medium - Manufacturing (MM) Zone in the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan area. The site currently consists of one (1) lot which is 1.59 acres. The site is currently developed with two single story industrial buildings. All of the existing buildings would be demolished. A strip at the top of the slope along the north property line is an abandoned railroad right -of -way which is currently used for parking/storage automobiles. The lot slopes gradually down from the south to the north with a steep descending slope of eight (8) feet in average height right along the northern property line. The lot also slopes from west to east with a twelve (12) foot decrease in elevation. The surrounding area is developed with multiple - family residential units immediately to the west, and industrial buildings to the north, east, and across Grand Avenue to the south. To the north of the site, across Holly Avenue, is a single - family residential area and a parkette. Surrounding land uses are as follows: MOM North: Light Industrial MM (MDR Floating) South: Light Industrial MM (GAC Floating) East : Light Industrial MM (MDR Floating) West: Multiple Family Residential MDR 2 001)20 The original project was approved by the City Council on May 4, 1993. Pursuant to Section 19.04.150 and 19.08.030 C. of the El Segundo Municipal Code (ESMC), the development rights granted by the approval of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map would expire two years following approval of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map unless the Final Tract Map was recorded. Prior to the scheduled expiration date (May 4, 1995), a new State law was adopted (Senate Bill 428) which automatically extended the development right for projects with approved Tentative Tract Maps for two years. Subsequently, another automatic one year extension was adopted by the State (Assembly Bill 771). This extended the expiration date of the Tentative Tract Map to May 4, 1998. Section 19.04.150 C. of the ESMC provides for the approval of up to five (5) one year extensions, subject to the approval of the Planning Commission, and in this case, the City Council because the City Council approved the original project. The site is designated as Smoky Hollow Mixed -Use in the General Plan Land Use Element, and the site is zoned Medium Manufacturing (MM) with a "floating" Medium Density Residential (MDR) Zone. The project meets the current development standards for density. The Smoky Hollow Specific Plan at the time of approval allowed 22 -units per acre for parcels of between one and three acres. The General Plan and current Zoning code allows 18 -units per acre for the same size parcels. The project proposed 17.6 -units per acre. The approved vesting tentative tract map is consistent with the land use pattern of the adjacent MDR property to the west and the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan. The approved use, however, may not be consistent with the current light industrial uses adjacent to the north, to the south across Grand Avenue, and to the east across Kansas Street. However, the designation of the area in the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan for residential uses through the "Floating" MDR Zone anticipated that the property might be converted to residential use while the light industrial uses to the north, east and south would remain. The proposed extension of the approved tentative tract map for the condominium development is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan to preserve and maintain the City's low- medium density residential nature and promote construction of high quality multi - family residential developments. It is consistent with the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan which provides the Medium Density Residential Zone as a transition area from the single family residences to the north and the industrial uses to the south. Additionally, it would permit an underdeveloped property designated as residential to develop with a diversity of types, prices and tenure. Conformance with the General Plan is a policy issue which is determined at the discretion of the Planning Commission and the City Council. A draft Initial Study was prepared by City staff for the project to evaluate the potential adverse environmental impacts related to the extension of the proposed project. No significant adverse environmental impacts were identified, and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts is proposed. A final Initial Study will be prepared by staff based on any mitigation measures that might �3 be required by the Planning Commission or City Council. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was also previously certified by the City Council on May 4,1993 under EA -285. This project is identical to that previously covered by the certified EIR. Staff and the City Attorney determined an Initial Study should be prepared to because the extension of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map is considered a project under CEQA and not categorically exempt from environmental review. Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared by staff. DISCUSSION The original project included the approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map in conjunction with the Smoky Hollow Site Plan. A Vesting Tract Map is designed to lock in the policies and regulation in effect at the time of project approval, to provide the developer assurances that the project can be built as approved. However, since the approval of a extension to the Vesting Tentative Tract Map is a discretionary action by the Planning Commission and City Council, the City does have the authority to condition the extension or modify the existing conditions of approval. In light of this, there are two conditions of approval for the original project that staff believes should be revised at this time. Condition of Approval No. 17 of City Council Resolution No. 3811 for the approved project, stated that transportation impact fees would have to be paid, in accordance with a pending study of transportation impacts being undertaken by the City. The City did complete that transportation fee study and adopted a Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program on May 21, 1996. In order to clarify that the approved project is subject to the fees set forth in City Council Resolution No. 3969, staff recommends a Condition of approval be added to the proposed extension stating that the project is subject to the adopted Traffic Mitigation Fee Program. The fees would total approximately $1,660.00. Condition of Approval No. 31 K of City Council Resolution No. 3811 requires a separate landscaping irrigation water system from the domestic supply system to support the future use of reclaimed water for irrigation of the landscaping. While the Condition states that reclaimed water would be provide by the City in 1994 -95, reclaimed water will actually be provided by the West Basin Municipal Water District in the near future. Staff recommends that a new condition of approval be added to the proposed extension to clarify that the landscaping irrigation must be hooked up to the facilities of West Basin Water District when available. The project application and plans were not circulated to inter - departmental staff because there were no changes proposed in the development of the project and all department reviewed the project prior to its approval in 1993. A. (Draft) Resolution No. 2421 B. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated April 8, 1993 C. City Council Resolution No. 3811 for EA -285 C. Initial Study, dated June 15, 1998 D. Applications E. Vesting Tentative Map No. 51109 4 00 922 Prepared by: -fia Paul Garry Assistant Planner Reviewed by: Laurie B. Jester Senior Planner Approved by: Bret . Ber ard,A ICP Dire or o Plani ing and Building Safety, and Secretary to the Planning Commission p:\projects\426-450\ea439\ea439.sr 0 002' City of El Segundo INTMDEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE t++ Meeting Date. April 8, 1993 TO. Honorable Chairwoman and Planning Commissioners FROM: Hyrum B. Fedje, Director of Planning and Building Safety STAFF PLANNER: Paul Garry, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment EA -286, Subdivision 92-3, Smoky Hollow Site Plan 92-1, Vesting Tentative Map 61109 1416 E. Grand Avenue Applicant: Jim Kisrian REQUEST The proposed project is the construction of a 28 -unit Townhouse -style condominium at a density of 1 7.6 units per acre (18 units per acre permitted) on a L69 acre site. The project is located at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Kansas Street in the Medium Manufacturing (MM) zone in the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan area The application includes a subdivision request to create condominium ownership and a request to activate the Medium Density Residential (MDR) zoning on the site. The project has been redesigned since the public hearing notice was published and since the distribution of the DSEIR. The variance for the north and south side yard landscape encroachments, the Grand Avenue emergency vehicle access, and the 12 foot high north side retaining wall associated with the project have been eliminated. RECOMMENDATION As the advisory body for the project, the Commission shall consider the following for recommendation to the Council: 1. Approval /denial of Smoky Hollow Site Plan 92.1 to ensure consistency of the site plan with the intent of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan and to activate the Medium Density Residential Zoning on the site. 2. Approval /denial of Subdivision 92-3, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 61009 to create 28 residential condominium ownerships. 4. Certification that the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EA -286) is an adequate and complete document. Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the project adequately meets the intent of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan, and that all of the environmental impacts created by the project can be adequately mitigated by the proposed conditions. Further, that the activation of the MDR zone is in conformance with the City's policies and goals for the Smoky Hollow area and that these can be achieved by the approval of the proposed project which is substantially in conformance with the Plan's development regulations. Staff further recommends that the Planning Commission find that the subdivision application may be approved in accordance with the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan and the City's subdivision ordinance. The State Clearinghouse review period for public agencies ended on April 6, 1993, so at this time the Commission may take action on these applications. Therefore, staff recommends that the Commission open the public hearing, take public testimony, and take action on the proposed project. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend certification to the City Council of the draft SEIR as an adequate and complete document, and approval of Smoky Hollow Site Plan 92 -1 and Subdivision 92.3, by adopting draft Resolution 2336. SITE DESCRIPTION The site is currently developed with two single story industrial buildings which would be demolished. The larger of the existing buildings is currently occupied by Overland Technology Corporation (OTC), which designs and assembles different type of technological equipment. The rear of the larger structure is also occupied by a new small airfreight /cargo storage firm (KRD Cargo Systems). The smaller building, on the north end of the site, is occupied by a manufacturer of flags, banners and signs. Previous to these uses the whole site was occupied by Wyrefab, a manufacture of greeting card stands. A strip approximately 66 feet wide at the 0002 ^ top of the slope along the north property line is an abandoned railroad right- of-way which is currently used for parking/storage of dismantled and wrecked automobiles. The lot slopes from west to east with a twelve (12) foot decrease in elevation and a steep descending slope of eight (8) feet in average height right along the northern property line. ,SURROUNDING AREA CHARACTERISTICS The surrounding area is developed with multiple - family residential units immediately to the west, and industrial buildings to the north, east, and across Grand Avenue to the south. A similar 28 unit condominium project has been approved for the site adjacent to the north property line (EA -227, Holly Park Townhomes). This was the second project approved under the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan Medium Density Residential Floating Zone. To the north of that site is a single - family residential area Surrounding land uses are as follows: Land Use North: Light Industrial South: Light Industrial East : Light Industrial West : Multiple Family Residential PROJECT DESCRIPTION zone MM (MDR Floating) MM (bMR Floating) MM (MDR Floating) MDR The proposed project consists of six (6) buildings, containing four (4) to seven (7) units each, for a total of twenty -eight (28) unit& Each unit consists of three (3) levels with a three car garage on the semi- subterranean bottom level. Kitchen and living areas are on the second level, and the bedrooms and two baths are on the third level. Twenty -one (21) units would be three bedroom, two and a half baths with 1,861 square feet each, and seven (7) units would be two bedroom, two and a half baths with 1,844 square feet of area Each unit also provides approximately 118 square feet of private patios off of the living room and bedrooms. The total square footage does not include the three car enclosed garage. Nine (9) open guest parking spaces are provided in five (b) separate areas on the project site. The main entrance and exit for the project would be off of Kansas Street; a second exit, which was proposed on Grand Avenue as an emergency vehicle only access, has been deleted from the plan. The access point on Kansas Street will be controlled by security gates. Approximately 20,840 square feet or 30% of the total site area would be open space. This area includes the projects' swimming pool, private patios and landscaped areas throughout the site. The design of the units would be traditional 'cape cod' with a wood shingle siding, round wood columns, and a wood shingle roof. Decorative wood railings would highlight the second story windows. INTER- DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS The project application and plans were circulated in August, 1992. Inter- departmental comments are attached to the report and most have been incorporated into the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR). The DSEIR was circulated to all departments for review and comment on February 19, 1993. All of the comments received will be responded to and, if appropriate, incorporated into the Final EIR. The Fire Department has commented that the project must have a residential fire sprinkler system as specified in the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan and that fire hydrants and fire department access are minimum requirements, although two access points into the project are not required. The Fire Department comments on access were based on the original site plan. Now, according to the Fire Department, the revised site plan meets the access requirements of the Fire Code. Additionally, they have indicated that Knox boxes or locks will be required on all security gates. The Police Department provided a list of standard conditions that have been incorporated into the conditions of approval and will be included in the Final SEIR. The Building Safety Division has indicated that no specific comments are being provided at this time, and that plans will be reviewed for code conformance when they are submitted to plan check. The Department of Public Works indicated that a corner cut -off at the intersection of Kansas Street and Grand Avenue for sidewalks should be dedicated to the City and that street lights be installed on both Grand Avenue and Kansas Street frontages. The undergrounding of overhead utilities along Grand Avenue and Kansas Street is being requested, if a study to be prepared by the applicant shows that the work is feasible. Staff recommends that a piecemeal approach to utility undergrounding should not be initiated. Only through an assessment district should undergrounding of a whole area be required. Additional recommendations, such x;019 25 as replacing the entire sewer main from Grand Avenue to Holly Avenue, were also required of the Holly Park project. Public Works has commented that whichever of the two projects begins construction first should be required to carry out this work. The Department of Public Works is recommending a fair share traffic impaot fee of $020 per gross square foot of building and parking area. While acknowledging that no nexus has yet to be established between this amount and any planned traffic improvements in the area, Public Works is recommending the fee be applied until they complete a traffic impact fee study. This fee is based on a consensus of fees from previously approved projects. Sta$ however, is recommending that no traffic impact fee be applied until the Department of Public Works completes its fee study and provides a nexus Public Works also commented that 1988 traffic counts should have been used instead of 1991 because 1988 is recognized as the worst -case base line year to use for traffic comparison In the DSEIR the 1991 figures that were used were based on actual traffic counts that were taken for the Holly Park project DSEIR. These figures indicate that traffic was worse in 1991 at the intersection of Sepulveda Blvd. and Grand Avenue, operating at level "C' instead of Level "B', than it was in 1988. This intersection is considered the critical intersection for any impacts from the project. Thus the new 1991 figures were used as worse case scenario with a standard growth factor for a 1993 base year. As a result of this, Staff will direct the traffic consultant to recalculate the future traffic volumes and cumulative impacts by eliminating from the related projects, all projects built between 1988 and 1991 which have been double counted. This should reduce the future traffic that is forecast for the area Standard conditions of approval from several departments which are based on various code requirements are not included in the Conditions of Approval. These standard conditions will be incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring report which will be acted upon by the City Council as part of the Final EIR . ANALYSIS The following outlines each of the applications which require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council: a) SMOKY HOLLOW SITE PLAN 92 -1 The Smoky Hollow Spec Plan in Section III -F, pages III -18 and 19, describes the procedure and criteria through which the Medium Density Residential District (MDR) may be activated. The criteria state that this area should provide sufficient buffering and open space and provide a transition between the existing residential neighborhoods to the north and more intensive industrial uses throughout the rest of the Smoky Hollow area The criteria indicates that the MDR zone should be developed at a density that is lower than R -3 standards. Residential development is excluded from the remaining area of the Specific Plan except for single caretaker units. This section of the plan also specifies the uses allowed, the site development standards, landscape requirements, and parking requirements in the MDR zone. The site development standards for the MDR zone are based on the R -3 zoning district standards although they are more restrictive in certain circumstances due to the unique characteristics of the district. On May 11, 1989, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1137 which revised the R -3 development standards. Since the MDR development standards are based on the R -3 standards, where the new R -3 standards are more restrictive than specified in the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan, staff has applied the more restrictive standard. The new General Plan has subsequently reduced the density allowed for residential uses on lots of 1 -3 acres from 22 units per acre to 18 units per acre. The General Plan has also changed the requirement that all lots to be developed for residential use be at least 2.5 acres or one complete block. The General Plan now states that "existing lots less than 2.5 acres in size, which are totally surrounded by other land use designations and confined by existing streets shall be allowed to develop as multi - family residential without a variance'. Therefore, the variance being requested for the 2.5 acre minimum lot has been eliminated from the project. The following chart reflects these revised standards. REQUIREMENTS Permitted Uses Minimum Lot Size MDR ZONE STANDARDS Multiple family including condominiums 2.5 acres or a complete block, unless surrounded by other land uses and streets. PROPOSED PROJECT STANDARDS Condominiums 1.59 acres (62,731 s.f) Surrounded by other land uses and streets. CO (-, ?6 ML. Lot area per dwelling unit Lot Coverage Front Setback (Kansas Street) Side Setbacks (Grand Avenue) (North Side) Rear Setback Height Useable Open Space Building Wall Modulation Landscaping Parking Spaces Access Wall Height C---) 18 units /acre 63% maximum 36,708 s.f. 16 ft. minimum 20 ft. average fully landscaped 30 ft minimum fully landscaped 16 ft minimum fully landscaped 6 ft. minimum 28 ft. 200 s.f. /unit minimum 6,600 total 24 ft. maximum horizontal or vertical wall plane facing property lines Permanent irrigation system 66 + 8 guest No vehicular access from Grand Avenue. 6 ft. retaining wall. 17.6 units /acre; 2,474 at/bt area per unit 39.15% 27,119 s.L- 20 ft. minimum (m uding walks and patios) 30 ft. minimum 30 ft. Lndscaped (including walks and patios) 16 R minimum 20 ft. maximum 16 ft landscaped (including walks, pool, and deck). 6 ft. minimum 20 ft. mazimum 26 ft. 744 8.i /unit 20,840 total 24 ft. maximum wall plane Permanent irrigation system 84 + 9 guest Access from Kansas St. 6 foot retainment. The proposed project meets or exceeds all of the development standards required by the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan. The site plan in the DEER included variances for the lack of landscaping in the south and north side yards, Grand Avenue access and a 12 foot retaining wall along the north property line. These variance requests are no longer part of the project. Staff believes the proposed protect is consistent with the intent and goals of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan and the MDR zone. The Specific Plan states that the floating zone is a 'second generation' approach to land use planning. This zone was designated in response to market changes and demands identified through the Specific Plan process. The project provides sensible land use planning in relationship to adjacent land uses, arterial streets, and overall locational requirements. The proposal is consistent with the pattern of transition in land uses which is occurring in Smoky Hollow. This transition is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan. The proposal preserves the applicant's property rights by allowing the development of a project which is consistent with the MDR zone goals, policies and objectives. These goals indicate that residential uses must improve the overall quality of the area both physically and visually. By removing the existing industrial buildings and asphalt parking lots, and adding new condominiums, landscaping and public improvements, the site will be improved both physically and visually. The new use will also be compatible with the proposed multi- family residential to the north and multiple family residential to the west which is consistent with Smoky Hollow Specific Plan goals. c) SUBDIVISION 92- 3Msting Tentative Mau 61109 The Smoky Hollow Specific Plan allows condominium development as a permitted use. The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map is an airspace subdivision of the one (1) lot into twenty - eight (28) owners of the property. Residents will have exclusive rights to their personal units and garage, and a percentage ownership in the common areas and project amenities. 000 ,1 4 . 0 A Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR), has been prepared for this project to provide a site specific analysis of environmental impacts. The DSEIR was distributed to the Planning Commissioners on February 22, 1993. The Draft SEIR incorporates the Smoky Hollow Master Environmental Impact Report, prepared for the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan adopted in December 1985. The Initial Study and DSEIR identified potential significant impacts to soils and geology, air quality, noise, land use, risk of upset /human health, transportation /circulation, public services and utilities, and aesthetics /shadow. The DSEIR concludes that all of these potential adverse As this project is very similar to the recently approved Holly Park condominium project to the north of the subject property, and because the DS EIR for this project has come to some different conclusions than were made in the Holly Park DSEIR, it is important to discuss how and why the differences arise. A statement of Overriding Consideration was adopted for the Holly Park project based on the one direct project impact related to schools and significant cumulative project impacts related to air quality, water, noise, traffic and circulation, public services and utilities. Staff is suggesting that no Statement of Overriding Consideration is necessary for this project because there are no significant project related impacts and, because this project does not contribute to any significant cumulative project impacts The most important difference between the analysis of the two DSEIRs is the conclusion of this DSEIR that there will be no direct project impact on school facilities. That was the only direct project impact identified in the Holly Park EIR. The El Segundo Unified School District no longer considers Center Street Elementary School as operating at capacity due to the relocation of Kindergarten students to the Middle School. The proposed projects addition of 3.1 additional elementary school children will now not directly impact Center Street Elementary School. The 1991 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) recognizes that all projects contribute to cumulative impacts on air quality. The AQMP factors in growth projections in the region are based on local general plans so any projects deemed consistent with a local general plan must address cumulative air quality impacts through mitigation measures With the adoption of the mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring Report, the cumulative impacts on air quality are not considered significant. Water is not identified as a significant cumulative impact in the DSEIR based on the availability of additional water for new development that has been indicated by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) and due to the rescindance of WMD's mandatory water conservation program The related projects used to evaluate the cumulative noise impacts of both Holly Park and this project are primarily located east of Sepulveda Blvd. As a result, they will not cumulatively interact with the proposed project in a significant way, even if the closest projects on that list, Holly Park and the proposed LAX Athletic Club, were simultaneously under construction. The DEIR also concluded that the noise generated from the cumulative growth of traffic on Grand Avenue would increase ambient noise levels 3db, but will not contribute to a cumulative impact which would exceed 65 CNEL. A noise study will be required prior to project completion to verify that the City's noise standards are met. Based on this analysis cumulative noise impacts for the proposed project are not considered significant. The traffic engineer for the proposed project has determined that, based on ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) traffic generation rates, there will be s net decrease in traffic generation for both the AM and PM peak hours as compared to the previous industrial use of the site. Based on this, there is little potential for cumulative interaction with other projects The DEIR relied on the cumulative traffic analysis from the Holly Park DSEIR which identified the intersection of Grand Avenue and Sepulveda Blvd. as being significantly impacted by cumulative projects. The Level of Service (LOS) at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard is projected to degrade from the existing "C" LOS to "E" LOS in 1993 with the cumulative impact of all proposed projects, including the subject project, within the area. Level of Service "D" is generally considered to be acceptable, while "E' and "F" are unacceptable. The imposition of a condition of approval which will require the payment of a fair -share traffic impact fee, to be determined through a study to be undertaken by the Department of Public works, will reduce the cumulative impact of this project to an insignificant level. Cumulative impacts to public services, including fire, police, parks and recreation, and libraries were identified as significant in the Holly Park DSEHL The standard 1985 impact fees for Police, Fire, and Library service will be applied to this project. These fees are designed to offset the cost to the City of providing certain services to new development. This mitigation measure is considered by the DSEIR. as sufficient to reduce the impact of cumulative projects 00928 0 to a level of insignificance. There were no comments received from these departments which indicated any potential significant cumulative impacts would be caused by this project. As new projects are proposed, they will be required to pay impact fees to mitigate project impact, just as the subject project is required to do. Additionally, if the City adopts new ordinances which increase the impact fees, then the subject project and future projects will be required to pay these increased fees. Significant cumulative impacts identified in the Holly Park DSEIR to utilities include sanitary sewers, and solid waste. All of the related projects, which will cause cumulative impede to the sewer system, are located east of Sepulveda Blvd. and are serviced by Los Angeles County Sanitation District This district will have a significant adverse impact, but that impact is not related to this project. All projects that are east of Sepulveda Boulevard which impact the County Sanitation District will be required to pay their fair -share to mitigate their individual impacts. The impact to Hyperion Treatment Plan which services areas west of Sepulveda Boulevard, including the proposed project site, will not be significant. The City currently has approximately an additional 25,000 gallons of excess sewer allotment with Hyperion. This allotment may be used for future projects west of Sepulveda Boulevard, and 6,868 additional gallons are allotted each day. The areas west of Sepulveda can be adequately serviced by the existing Hyperion Treatment Plant. Therefore, the proposed project will not contribute to a significant cumulative impact on the sanitary sewer system of which it is a part. Solid waste cumulative project impacts were evaluated using differing methodologies in the two DSEIR's under discussion. By outlining the projected landfill capacity of the county, the conclusion was made that there will not be a significant cumulative impact from solid waste. Additionally, AB 939 requires each city and county to divert 25% of their waste from landfills by 1995, and 50% by the year 2000. Conformancy with this requirement will also reduce potential cumulative project impacts. CONCLUSION The final EIR, which will go before the City Council for certification, will include a mitigation monitoring program and will incorporate all comments and responses to those comments received within the forty -five (45) day public review period. The final EIR shall also include revisions to those areas affected by the revised site plan, such as shade and shadow. Staff does not anticipate any significant project related or cumulative impala as a result of the modification to the site plan. In accordance with CEQA requirements, the State Clearinghouse forty -five (45) day public and agency review, period ended on April 5, 1993. Therefore, the Planning Commission can take action on this item tonight. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend certification to the City Council of the Draft SEIR as an adequate and complete document and approval of Smoky Hollow Site Plan 92 -1 and Subdivision 92 -3, with changes as noted in the Inter - departmental comments section of this report. A. Draft Resolution 2335 B. Fiscal Impact Analysis C. Applications D. Inter - Departmental and Agency Comments on the WEIR E. Plans Prepared by: ttj 4-a� Paul Garry Assistant Planner R viewed by: Laurie B. Jes Senior Planner ry H B. Fbdje Director of Planning and wilding Safety 6 LAn&NVsa 00r' 219 RESOLUTION NO. ,U11_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC L OP Tim CTTY OF BL SBGUNDO, CAIIPORNIA POR C�t1ZFiCATION OP A SUPPiUM 1TAL BrIVIIWNMBrTTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTION OF A (MITIGATION IMONTTOMN NO. BM285, AND APPROVAL FOR HriV�ONMBNTAL ASSESSMENT SUBDIVISION , VESTING TENTATIVE IItAP NO. 51109 Aria SIMO)Of 97x3 ` HOLLOW STTB PLAN 92-1 TO CONSTRUCT A 23 UNIT TOWNHOUSZ -STYLE CONDOIMmm AT 1415 B. GRAND AVENUE. PETITIONED BY jlat XIM M. VHMU AS, on April 10, 1992 an application was received from Jim Kbirian for Environmental Assessment EA -285, Subdivision 92 -3, Vesting Tentative Map No. 51109, and Smoky Hollow Site Plan 92.1 ( to allow a 28 unit townhouse -style condominium at 1415 E. Grand Avenue; and r WHBRBAS, a Notice of Preparation was filed on December 16, 1992 for preparation of the Draft Environmental impact Report, and the Draft Environmental Impact Report was dulycirculated and noticed as required by law; and VHERBAS, the Draft Environmental impact Report identified D4 significant direct project impacts and i14 adverse related projects cumulative impacts; and vHEREAS, on April 8, 1993 the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to law, a duly-adverdsed public hearing on such matter, and notice of heating was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law and opportunity was given to all persons to present testimony or documentary evidence for or against Environmental Assessment EA -285, Subdivision 92.3, Vesting Tentative Map No. 51109, and Smoky Hollow Site Plan 92 -1; and on April 8, 1993 the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 2335 recommending approval to the city Council of Environmental Assessment EA -285, Subdivision 92 -3, Vesting Tentative Map 51109, and Smoky Hollow Site Plan 92.1; and WI�iBAS, on May 4, 1993, the City Council did hold pursuant to law, a duly-advertised public hearing on such matter, and notice of hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law and opportunity was given to all persons to presenV� moony or documentary evi and Smoky Hollow Environmental Assessment EA -285, Subdivision 92 -3, g P Site Plan 92 -1; and WIIiRBA•S, at said hearing the following facts were established: 1 The applicant is proposing to construct a 28 unit townhouse -style condominium project at a density of 17.6 units per acre with 84 garage Puking spaces and 9 guest puling spaces on a 1.59 acre site at 1415 E. Grand Avenue in the Medium Manufacturing (M-M) zone. 2. The applicant is requesting implementation of the Medium Density Residential (MDR) Floating Zone in the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan area, which implementation requires City Council approval. 3. The site contains one 69,260 square foot triangular shaped lot. Them are presently two one story industrial buildings on the site that would be demolished. 4. The site and surrounding area to the north, west, south and east a-e lzsignated by the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan for manufacturing use with a Medium D. -natty Residential use overlay for all but the property to the south, all of which is consistetrt with the zoning of the site. The surrounding land uses are to the west Medium Density Residential, to the south and east Industrial, and to the north Industrial with an approved 28 unit Medium Density Residential project. Farther to the north is single family residential. 5. The goals of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan are to provide buffering, open space, and a transition between existing residential neighborhoods and the industrial areas in Smoky Hollow, provide adequate parking, and improve the overall quality of the area both physically and visually. 6. The Fiscal impact tely Analysis for thwilP �� indicates annuual costs for services will generate annual $47,200.ues of appro)dma ly $15,500 7. The Planning Commission recommended that pedestrian access gates on Grand Avenue and Kansas Street be provided, that the swinging entry gate be replaced by a sliding gate, and that adequate vision clearance be provided In the front yard landscaping. 1 '01)5O NOW THER OAB, BE IT RESOLVED That after consideration of the above facts and study of proposed Environmental Assessment EA -285, Subdivision 92 -3, Vesting Tentative Map No. 51109, and Smoky Hollow Site Plan 92.1, the City Council finds as follows: i SUBDIVISION 1. The proposed subdivision to create condominium ownership, and the design of the proposed townhouse -style multiple- family residences are consistent with the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan through the activation of the Medium Density Residential (MDR) Floating Zone. 2. The site is physically suitable for residential townhouse development at the proposed density of one unit per 2,474 square feet of site area (28 units or 17.6 units per acre). 3. The design of the subdivision improvements adequately provides for public services and is not likely to cause any public health problems due to the mitigation measures provided for in the Draft Environmental Impact Report. SMOHY HOUR W SPECIFIC PLAN 1. The proposed project provides sufficient buffering and open space, and provides a transition between the existing residential neighborhoods to the north and more intensive industrial uses throughout the rest of Smoky Hollow; 2. The proposed project is developed at a density lower that R -3 standards; 3. The proposed project meets or exceeds all of the development standards required by the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan. GENERAL PLAN 1. The project is consistent with the General Plan land designation of Smoky Hollow Mixed Use which allows a density of 18 units per acre (17.6 proposed) 2. The projects provide ample open space, leisure, and recreational facilities and while preserving and maintaining the City's low - medium density residential nature in conformance with the General Plan. RNVMONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1. The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report is an adequate and complete document in accordance with the State CEQA requirements and the local CEQA guidelines. 2. The mitigation monitoring program has been prepared in accordance with the State government requirements contained in Section 21081 of the Public Resources Code. 3. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on soils and geology, air quality, noise, land use, risk of upseVhuman health, tmnsportadon/dreuladon, public services and utilities, and aesthedc/shadows. The final supplemental Environmental Impact Report concluded that there were no negative impacts directly related to the project. 4. The Final supplemental Environmental Impact Report identified one significant cumulative impact related directly to the project which is potentially adverse, but can be mitigated to an insignificant level by conditions imposed upon the project in the area of ttaliidcirculadon, specifically the intersection of Sepulveda Boulevard and Grand Avenue. S. The Draft SEIR did = identify project alternatives which would reduce environmental impacts, and the proposed project was determined to be the environmentally superior alternative, including the *no project" alternative, since it reduces grading, vehicular traffic, emissions, noise, light and glare, shade/shadow, land use, and visuaVaesthetic impacts. The "no project" alternative would = implement the goals, policies and objectives of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan. The land use and aesthetic objectives to replace industrial uses with new compatible residential uses which will provide a buffer, transition and additional open space would not be met with the 'no project' alternative. The two "development under the existing M -M zoning' alternatives would increase the adverse impacts related to air quality, noise, land use, risk of upset/human health, traffic, and aesthetics. The reduced density residential alternative would result in similar or fewer impacts compared to the proposed project, but is not considered environmentally superior because there are no significant impacts associated with the proposed project. 60031 s : 6. That when considering the whole record, there is no evidence that the project will haw the a• .. potential for an adverse elfi:ct on wildlife resources or the habitat on whicfa the wildlife depends. 11 �f� 7. That the City Council thereby authorizes and directs the Director of Planning and Building Safety ' •: ` i to file with the appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and de minimus Ending pursuant to AB 3158 and the California Code of Regulations. Within ten (10) days of this approval, the applicant shall submit a fee of $25.00 required by the County of Los Angeles for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of Determination. As approved for in AB 315$ the statutory requirements of CEQA will not be met and no vesting shall occur until this condition is met and the required notices and fees are filed with the County.. NOW THEREBY BE 1T RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves Environmental Assessment FA. 285, Subdivision 92.3, Vesting Tentative Map No. 51109, and Smoky Hollow Site Plan 92.1, subject to the following conditions and mitigation measures: SUBDIVISION 1. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall provide proof to the Director of Planning and Building Safety that Final Tract Map No. 51109 has been recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall provide the city, prior to issuance of building permits, three (3) copies of the recorded map and one (1) reproducible copy such as a mylar or sepia. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the plan shall indicate compliance with the site plan and architectural style as shown in the elevations reviewed by the Planning Commission. The project shall not exceed the twenty -eight (28) foot allowable height limit as measured from finished grade to the midpoint of the highest sloped root Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred to the Director of Planning and Building Safety for a determination regarding the need for Planning Commission review of the proposed modification. 3. Prior to the recordation of the Vesting Tentative Map, the Final Vesting Map shall show all easements on the property. Any grading or construction in any easement shall require written approval from the easement holder prior to permit issuance. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan to the Director of Planning and Building Safety which shall include pedestrian access gates on both Grand Avenue and Kansas Street. The revised site plan shall also indicate that the swinging vehicle entry gate has been replaced with a sliding gate. Approved pedestrian gates and sliding vehicle gate shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans shall show a minimum of 65 cubic feet of personal storage space for each dwelling unit. 6. Prior to issuance of grading permits, a dust control plats shall be submitted by the applicant to the Director of Planning and Building Safety for review and approval. Project grading shall minimize airborne dirt and dust palliative by using the following methods: a. Apply approved chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for four days or more). b. Replace ground cover in disturbed areas as quickly as possible. e. Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply approved soil binders, according to manu6cturers specifications, to exposed stock piles (i.e. gravel, sand, dirt). d. Water active sites twice daily. e. Sweep streets at the end of day if any visible soil material is carried over to adjacent thoroughfares (use water sweepers which use reclaimed crater, if possible). C use low - sulfur fuel for stationary construction equipment pursuant to AQMD Rule 4312• 7. In order to reduce short-term dust impacts, grading activities shall cease during periods of adverse wind conditions. The Director of Planning and Building Safety shall determine when grading activities shall cease. 00 3? C0r1j3") �•- possible has conducted 8. Landscaping on slope banks shall be planted as soon as after final grading 1 • in order to minimize debris production and sod erosion. All landscaping shall be irrigated and maintained in good condition. Landscaping and Irrigation shall be approved by the Director of Parks. _ - Recreation and . 9. All construction equipment shall meet state and federal emissions control atattdarda. The applicant shall provide proof of compliance to the Director of Planning and Building Safety prior to issuance of grading permits. NOISE 10. All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, operated within 1,000 feet of a dwelling unit shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained muffler exhaust systems. 11. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the project, the applicant shall submit a noise study that analyzes the structural noise abatement efficiency of the condominium project to verify that both CNEL and Single Event Noise Standards of the General Plan Noise Element will be met by the project. LIGHT AND GLARE 12. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit plans for street lights along the Grand Avenue and Kansas Stmt right-of-ways to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. High efficiency lamps shall be used for all street lighting to reduce electric consumption. Street light installation shall be coordinated with Southern California Edison and the approved lights shall be Installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 13• Prior to building permit issuance, a complete exterior lighting plan, including photometric study, shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety and the Chief of Police. Energy efficient lighting throughout the complex, parking arras, between buildings, by the trash area, and beside all entry doors is required Awes, passageways and recesses within the building complex shall be illuminated with a minimum intensity of twenty -five one hundredths (.25) footcandles during the hours of darkness. Areas around self - contained garages, guest parking, and driveway areas shall be illuminated with a minimum of one footcandle, on the parking and driving surlacq during the hours of darkness. Ughting shall be directional and shielded to prevent off-site illumination, and shall be protected by weather and vandalism resistant covers. Approved M, lighting shall be installed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. AESTHETICS/SHADOWS 14. All utilities such as natural gas and water shall be placed underground and a note to this effect shall be shown on the site plan prior to issuance of a building permit. Utilities such as electricity, telephone, and television shall be also served underground from, at a minimum, the nearest existing off-site utility pole. These utilities shall also be shown on the site plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. 15. A landscaping and irrigation plan shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Director of Recreation and Parks and the Chief of Police prior to issuance of a building permit. All landscaped areas shall be provided with a permanent automatic watering or irrigation system and shall be permanently maintained in a neat and clean manner. Landscaping shall consist of drought resistant plants and the plan shall be designed in accordance with the water conservation plan to be approved by the Director of Public Works. A majority of mature plant materials and box trees shall be used Mature landscaping, including trees, shall be provided on the north and west sides of the project to buffer the adjacent Medium Density Residential uses. Deciduous trees shall be provided on the south and west exposures to minimize summer heat gain and allow winter solar access. Landscaping shall be maintained low profile at all times around window, doors, and walkways to prevent hiding spaces for criminal activity, to provide for clear visibility, and to restrict climbing access. Landscaping in the front yard setback shall be designed to provide maximum visibility for vehicles entering and exiting the project. At the corners of the driveway and Kansas Street, landscaping shall conform to Section 20.58.090 of the El Segundo Municipal Code and no trees shall be allowed in these safety vision triangles. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed per the approved plans prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 16. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit a construction plan to the Director of Public Works for review and approval. Said plan shall incorporate as a minimum the following Items: C0r1j3") �+ r s. Off-street parking for construction workers and equipment In the vicinity of the project site- r b. Elimination of curb -side parking in the construction arcs. r e �- + :Yt C. Provisions for a staging area for earth moving vehicles. d. Hours of construction with potential restrictions during peak hour tra@ie periods. Trucks arriving and departing the site shall be restricted to the hours of 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM- 17. The applicant shall be required to pay fees, prior to issuance of building permits, in accordance with a pending study on transportation impact fees and adoption of a traffic ice impact ordinance by the City. Fees will be used to fund various transportation improvements including proposed improvements to the Sepulveda Boulevard/Grand Avenue intersection. utnr rr SEPWICES - POLCE PROTECTION 18. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall consult with the Police Department for advice and implementation of crime prevention measures appropriate to the particular design of the proposed project- 19. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans shall indicate the following to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building Safety and the Chief of Police: a. Main entry doors with glass constructed in or within 40' (including windows along the side of the entry door) of the locking mechanism shall reverse the swing of the door if a window Is positioned within 40" of the locking mechanism Q$ reverse the position of the window to be opposite the locking mechanism Q$ all glass shall be replaced with polycarbonate materials, or fully tempered glass or rated burglary resistent glazing. b. Strike plates shall be made with a minimum sixteen (16) U.S. gauge steel, bronze or brass and secured to the jamb by a minimum of two screws, off -set which must penetrate at least two (2) inches into solid backing beyond the surface to which the strike is attached c. All exterior doors shall have a deadbolt throw with a one inch projection. The cylinder guard shall be of rase hardened steel, with the outer edge angled or tapered and free spinning. The exterior part of the lock shall be connected to the inside portion of the lock with bolts at least 1/4 inch in diameter and constructed of steel. The locking mechanism shall contain a minimum of a five pin tumbler. d. If garage doors are electronically operated, there shall be no hardware on the outside. e. If permanently affixed ladders leading to roofs are utilized, they shall be fully enclosed with sheet metal to a height of ten (10) feet. This covering shall be locked against the ladder with a case- hardened hasp, secured with non - removable screws or bolts. Hinges on the cover shall be provided with non - removable pins when using pin -type hinges. If a padlock is used, it shall have a hardened steel shackle, locking at both heel and toe, and a minimum five -pin tumbler operation with non - removable key when in an unlocked position. E Perimeter wails located in the side and rear yards shall be designed to be a minimum of 6-feet in height measured from the outside finished grade, and solid construction design. Walls shall be designed to limit climbing access. Concrete walls may not have varied sections with decorative blocks which allow for stepping over the wall or part of the wall consisting of wrought iron. Wood, wrought iron, barred, or mesh perimeter walls shall be 6 -feet high and any horizontal cross members shall be on the inside of the property. g. AU entry gates shall be secured for maximum protection. h. The pool area shall be barred at a minimum of six (6) feet for safety and visibility. Hours of usage and pool rules shall be posted. I. A site directory shall be placed at entrances and guest parking areas not only for guests convenience, but for immediate locating for police, fire and medical emergencies. 20. If home security alarm systems are installed that are audible or monitored by a security company, the installation contractor shall Inform the perspective resident that there is an Alarm Permit required by the City of El Segundo and a False Alarm Ordinance enforced by the El Segundo Police Department. 6093 error UC SEIMCES FE PUBIIG t IBRA tX FIRE POLICE SCHOOIS AND RECREATION AND PARKS_ 21. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay a one -time library services mitigation fee of $0.03 per grow square foot of building floor area.. , 22. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay a one -time fire services mitigation fee of $0.14 per gross square foot of budding floor area. 23. Prior to budding permit issuance, the applicant shall pay a one -time police services mitigation fee of $0.11 per gross square foot of building floor area 24. If prior to issuance of building permits, the City has adopted new standards for library, Fire, and police mitigation fees in excess of those provided for in Conditions 21, 22, and 23, the applicant will be required to pay those fees. 25. if at the time of building permits for the project are issued, the City or the school district has adopted ordinances to require school impact fees, then the project owner shall be required to pay those fees. 26. If prior to issuance of building permits, the City has adopted an ordinance implementing Quimby Act park land dedication, in -lieu fees, or other park mitigation fees, the applicant shall be requited to pay those fees. ENERGY CONSERVATION 27. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans shall indicate the following to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building Safety: a. Thermal insulation in walls and ceilings which meet or exceed standards established by the State of California Energy Conservation Standards; b. Insulation of hot water pipes and duct systems; c. Installation of attic fans; d Use of natural ventilation where possible; e. Use of natural gas for space heating and cooking; E Florescent lighting shall be used where appropriate; g. Installation of flat plate solar collectors to heat swimming pools, hot tubs and spas, with natural gas back -up systems; h. Built -in appliances. refrigerators, and space conditioningequipment shall exceed the minimum efficiency levels mandated in the California Administrative Code, I. Building exteriors shall be finished with non -glare materials to reduce cooling loads. Interior walls shall be finished with light-colored materials to reflect more fight and thus incense lighting efficiency; j. Window systems shall be designed (Le., tinted glass or double - glassed windows) to reduce thermal gain and loss, and thus cooling loads during warm weather and heating load during cool weather; k. Installation of weather - stripping to prevent outside air from infiltratingand increasing interior space conditioning bads. 28. Prior to issuance of building permits, an energy conservation plan shall be submitted by the applicant to the Director of Planning and Building Safety which shows compliance with Section 66473.1 of the State Subdivision Map Act, which requires that the design of new subdivisions ' provide, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities'. 29. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall consult with the Southern California Edison Company and the Southern California Gas Company regarding feasible energy conservation 6 G0r,319 measures. The recommendations of the two companies shall be incorporated in to the required energy conservation plan to the extent feasible. UTILITIES - WATER 30. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to he Director of Public Works plans for a new eight (ii) inch diameter water main in Kansas Street from Grand Avenue to Holly Avenue. The existing six (6) inch water main shall be taken out of service. The approve eight (8) inch main shall be installed per he approved plans prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 31. Prior to issuance of building permits, he applicant shall submit a water conservation plan to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Recreation and Parks for review and approval. Approved water conservation devices and other aspects of he water conservation plan shall be installed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Low-flush toilets; b. Lowflow, showers and faucets; c. Insulation of hot water lines to provide hot water faster with less water waste and to keep hot pipes for heating cold water pipes; d. Ad permanently fixed water -using devices (including plumbing fixtures, toilets, etc.) shall be low water usage type. e. Landscaping with low water consuming plants wherever feasible; E Lawn areas should be limited or not provided; g. Group plants of similar water use to reduce over - irrigation of low-water -using plants; h. Installation of efficient irrigation systems which minimize runoff and evaporation and maximize the water which will reach he plant roots. Drip irrigation, sod moisture sensors, and automatic irrigation systems shall be used for increasing irrigation eflaciency; I. Use mulch extensively in all landscaped areas, applied on top of soil to improve the water- holding capacity of he sod by reducing evaporation and sod compaction; j. landscaping shall consist of drought resistant plants and he plan shall be designed for minimum water usage. All landscaped areas shall be provided with a permanent automatic watering or irrigation system and shall be permanently maintained in good working condition. All landscaping and the irrigation system shall meet he requirements of he City Water Conserving Landscape Ordinance (Ord. 1194). k. The exterior landscaping irrigation system shall be installed as a system separated from the domestic supply system and shall be installed so that upon the availability of reclaimed irrigation water from he City in 1994 -95, the landscape irrigation system can use reclaimed water. UTILITIES - SANITARY SMRS 32. Prior to he issuance of building permits, he applicant will complete a study to be submitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval, of he existing City Sewer Pump Station No. 4 located at he intersection of Kansas Street and Holly Avenue to determine if plant capacity will handle the additional load resulting from the project. if necessary, he applicant shall modify he pump station or provide alternate facilities to handle he additional load UTILITIES-, - EL ECTRCITY 33. The project applicant shall provide SCE with a complete set of approved site plans, street improvement plans, and copies of Grant Deeds prior to approval of the Final Map. the 34. removal of existing lights from he Soouthern Califbrn apEdison wooden poles arrangements l g the Grand Avenue and Kansas Street frontages. E ("10 0 00 1 35. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the project applicant shall submit plans to the Director of Public Works for the installation of street lights on the Southern California Edison marbelite poles along the street frontages on Grand Avenue and Kansas Street. High eiliclency lamps shall be used for all street lighting to reduce electricity consumption. Streets Ughts shaU be coordinated with Southern California Edison and approved lighting shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. • s �� M ..I� � ' • �tl 36. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the project, the applicant shall Incorporate the following items into the projects Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. & R's), to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building Safety and the City Attorney. A recorded copy of the final CC&R's shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Building Safety prior to Certificate of Occupancy issuance. a. Any leaks or spills on project driveways will be cleaned on a regular basis from all pavement and landscaped areas; b. The project's surface parking lots and driveways will be swept on a regular basis; c. Oils or other pollutants will be cleaned from surface parking areas on a regular basis either by utilizing biodegradable solvents or by spreading sand and vacuuming the residual matter; d. Any hazardous waste generated by the project will be removed and disposed of in accord with Los Angeles County requirements; 37. Prior to issuance of building permits, revised plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety indicating that the trash area will incorporate adequate additional space for the collection of recyclable materials in multiple bins. The additional space required for recycling material bins may be incorporated into an enlarged trash enclosure or may be located directly adjacent to the approved trash enclosure within a separate enclosed unit. Trash bin areas shall be closed at all times to discourage rummaging or use as a sleeping facility. The enclosures may not be located in any required parking space or yard area. 38. if at the time that the building permits for the project are issued the City has adopted an ordinance to require a solid waste impact fee, then the applicant shall be required to pay those fees. HUMAN HE&t9 LMISK OF UPSET 39. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, an asbestos sampling and laboratory analysis survey shall be perfornaed by the applicant in all on -site structures and if need, remedial action will be taken to remove this substance in accordance with all applicable laws, to.the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building Safety 40. Additional soil sampling will be conducted after site demolition and site grubbing but prior to site grading. A representative sampling will be conducted for overall site identification. If contaminated soil is encountered then it shall be cleaned and certified as such prior to disposal off-site, or it shall be disposed of at a landfill which accepts such waste in accordance will all applicable laws. All reports and certifications shall be submitted to the Fire Chief for review and approval prior to issuance of grading permits. 41. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall provide to the Fire Chief a list of companies that disposed or stored chemicals historically on the site to identify possible responsible parties for further investigation. 42. The Los Angeles County Health Department or State Department of Health Services, Teak Substances Control Program shall be contacted by the applicant to review any documentation from the investigation for final certification of site assessment through evaluation or preliminary endangerment assessment as provided for under California Health and Safety Code Section 253195. The results of this documentation shall be submitted to the Fire Chief for review. 43. The California Resources Agency, Department of Conservation Division of Oil and Gas, Long Beach District Office, shall be contacted immediately by the applicant to obtain information on the requirements for and approval to perform remedial plugging operations if any unrecorded wells are uncovered or damaged during excavation or grading. The City of El Segundo Fire Chief and Director of Planning and Building Safety shall also be notified immediately in the event that any unrecorded wells are uncovered or damaged. 8 00 '37 M loft PuBuC WORKS 44. During demolition and construction, the entire project site shall be enclosed by a six foot high chain link fence. Gates for site fencing shad not open over sidewalk/public right-of-way. Temporary material storage (24 -hour maximum) is allowed in the public right-of-way with a permit issued by the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. Temporary storage shall be Whited to the right-of-way directly adjacent to the subject property. Material storage shad be confined to parkway areas and street parking, as long as safe and adequate (minimum four (4) feet dear) pedestrian and vehicular passage is maintained at ad times. Stange beyond these areas in the public right -of -way requires prior approval of the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department and shad be limited to a maximum period of twenty-four (24) hours. 45. Prior to Certificate of occupancy, the applicant shad provide a cash deposit or surety acceptable to the City Attorney to the amount of 512.000 and to be retained by the City for one (1) year from date of completion and acceptance by the City Engineer• ThIs money will be used for correcting latent street damage resulting from construction activities. All money not committed at the end of the one (1) year period shall be refunded It is the rcgK nsMty of the perval tree to request refund of deposit. 46. New sewer laterals shall be constructed in the public right-of-way and shall be a minimum of six (6) inches inside diameter. Any additional new sewer laterals needed to serve the project shall also be 6 inch size. Material shall be *vitreous day pipe'. Each lateral shad have a six (6) inch dean out brought to grade at the property line and securely ripped A B9 size box shall be placed around the C.O. for protection. The box shad have a cover emblazoned with the word'sewee. if in a traffic area, cover shall be traffic approved. All planned sewer connections shall be checked for elevation prior to starting construction. Existing sewer laterals shad be plugged at the sewer mainline and rapped at the property line. Existing six (6) inch wyes may be reused if approved by the Director of Public Works. 47. The applicant shall dedicate to the City a corner cutoff at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Kansas Street. The applicant shall submit plans to the Director of Public Works In accordance with City standards for the improvement of the corner cutoff for sidewalks. The sidewalk shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. GEOLOGY/GRADING 48. Plans shall incorporate to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning and Building Safety ajj of the conclusions and recommendations in the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Volume 11 Technical appendices as detailed on Pages 6 through 14 of Appendix 'B' prepared by GA Nichol and Associates, entitled 'Geotechnical Investigation; dated January 14, 1993. These recommendations arc incorporated by reference as Exhibit 'A'. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same In the book of original resolutions of said city; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting which the same is passed and adopted.2 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED " k0l day of JUX 1993• ATTEST: dy Mo t., ty erk City of El Segundo (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4-11. and Dolley, City A orney 9 k -kJ r J ise, Mayor ProTem City of El Segundo, California E42$5=UW 03911 IJO "!J CITY OF EL SEGUNDO NEGATIVE DECLARATION EXTENSION TO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 51109 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA -439 SUBDIVISION SUB 98 -2 JUNE 15, 1998 Prepared by: CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING SAFETY 350 MAIN STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 1 GO�3`) SECTION 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is the one year extension of a previously approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map and associated approvals for the construction of a 28 -unit townhouse -style condominium at 1415 E. Grand Avenue. The purpose of the extension is to allow additional time for the development of the project. The project was originally approved by the City Council on May 4,1993. No changes in the project are proposed. The approved project is composed of five separate buildings. The 28 condominiums consist of two unit designs with 1844 -1851 square feet of living area, a ground floor enclosed patio, three different balconies, plus a three (3) car garage. Each unit consists of three (3) levels with a three car garage on the semi - subterranean bottom level, kitchen and living areas on the second level, and bedrooms on the third level. Nine visitor parking spaces, two trash enclosures, and an outdoor swimming pool with poolhouse are proposed on the lot. The original application included a request to activate the "floating" Medium Density Residential (MDR) Zone for the site (SHSP 92 -1). The project also included an application for condominium ownership (Subdivision 92- Westing Tentative Tract Map 51109). As part of the City's review of the request to activate the "floating" Medium Density Residential Zone, a focused Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared to address land use, transportation/circulation, utilities, noise, and air quality. The SEIR was certified by the City Council on May 4, 1993. SECTION 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENT The approved project site is located on the northwest comer of Grand Avenue and Kansas Street in the Medium - Manufacturing (MM) Zone in the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan area. The site currently consists of one (1) lot which is 1.59 acres. The site is currently developed with two single story industrial buildings. All of the existing buildings would be demolished. A strip at the top of the slope along the north property line is an abandoned railroad right -of -way which is currently used for parking /storage automobiles. The lot slopes gradually down from the south to the north with a steep descending slope of eight (8) feet in average height right along the northern property line. The lot also slopes from west to east with a twelve (12) foot decrease in elevation. The surrounding area is developed with multiple - family residential units immediately to the west, and industrial buildings to the north, east, and across Grand Avenue to the south. To the north of the site, across Holly Avenue, is a single - family residential area and a parkette. SECTION 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Reproduced as Appendix 1 is the City of El Segundo Initial Study and Checklist under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The purpose of the form is to identify and evaluate potential adverse environmental impacts. The checklist consists of background information, a checklist of environmental impacts, and a determination by the lead agency of the project's potential impacts on the environment and the type of CEQA document that will be prepared. A discussion of the items checked on the form is located in Section 4.0. SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1. LAND USE PLANNING The approved project would remove the current light industrial use and develop a medium density residential use, and represents a major change in land use. The site is currently developed with two Uo industrial buildings which would be demolished and replaced with a 28 -unit condominium project. Land uses to the west and north are condominium and industrial warehouse development, respectively. To the east and south are light industrial and research and development uses. The site is designated as Smoky Hollow Mixed -Use in the General Plan Land Use Element, and the site is zoned Medium Manufacturing (MM) with a "floating" Medium Density Residential (MDR) Zone. The project meets the current development standards for density. The Smoky Hollow Specific Plan at the time of approval allowed 22 -units per acre for parcels of between one and three acres. The General Plan and current Zoning code allows 18 -units per acre for the same size parcels. The project proposed 17.6 -units per acre. The approved vesting tentative tract map is consistent with the land use pattern of the adjacent MDR property to the west and the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan. The approved use, however, may not be consistent with the current light industrial uses to the south across Grand Avenue, to the east, and the east across Kansas Street. The proposed extension of the approved tentative tract map for the condominium development is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan to preserve and maintain the City's low- medium density residential nature and promote construction of high quality multi - family residential developments. It is consistent with the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan which provides the Medium Density Residential Zone as a transition area from the single family residences to the north and the industrial uses to the south. Additionally, it would permit an underdeveloped property designated as residential to develop with a diversity of types, prices and tenure. 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING The project will increase the density of housing in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) overlay zone in the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan area. This is the second project to utilize the overlay zone and each of these projects are contiguous on land that was previously industrial. The proposed project would remove two existing industrial buildings and supply twenty-eight (28) new condominium units. There would be a net gain of 28 dwelling units. The project will assist in meeting the existing demand for housing by adding 28 new units to the City's housing stock. The units would be individually owned and most likely owner - occupied. No significant impacts to housing demand are anticipated. The jobs- housing balance in the City will also be positively affected by the project. No change in impact on population and housing is anticipated as part of the project extension. 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS No change in impact on geologic resources is anticipated as part of the project extension. The geologic impacts were also addressed in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the approved project. While there will be grading associated with this project, there will be no unstable earth conditions or changes in geological substructures. A retaining wall will be built along the northern property line to support the 8 -foot descending slope. The issuance of a grading permit as a condition of approval was included in the original project approvals to ensure slope stability. There are no unique geological or physical features on the project site. Therefore, the project will not impact unique features. The project will not increase or change deposition /erosion either off or on site; and the project will not modify any body of water as a result of erosion or deposition. The project would be subject to the state Water Quality Control Board's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit for regulation of silt and discharge into surface waters during construction and occupation. Project implementation will not result in geologic hazard, such as earthquakes, beyond the potential already associated with the project site. K U0 .9 4' The existing two industrial structures, driveways, and landscaping will be removed to accommodate the approved condominium project. The amount of paving on the site will decrease slightly with the new development as a large proportion of the lot is presently paved area. Excavation for the semi - subterranean garage, as well as the proposed grading on the site, will disrupt the existing topography. A grading plan will be required prior to issuance of a building permit to ensure adequate soil compaction, dust control, structural support and protection of neighboring properties. Along the northern border of the site is an earthen berm with a four to eighteen foot decrease in height. The site will be graded up approximately half way leaving a five to twelve foot retaining wall along the property line. There will be a difference in grade of up to fifteen feet between the majority of this project and the property to the north at the bottom of the retaining wall. The impacts of the difference in height of the structures for each project is discussed under Aesthetics. The construction is typical of new residential development in urban areas, and the impact is not anticipated to be significant. However, the proposed project may be affected by the release of hazardous substances due to the industrial nature of previous uses on the site (see No. 9, Hazards). 4. WATER No change in impact on water is anticipated as part of the project extension. The project site is located in an urban setting and is not near any surface water bodies or within a flood plain designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency or in any area subject to flooding. Therefore, the project will not change the course, direction, current, or flow of any fresh or marine waters or flood waters and will not involve the exposure of people or property to water - related hazards. The amount of surface water in any body of water or the quality of surface water will not change as a result of this project because of the urban setting and lack of direct interaction with any bodies of water. The temporary surface grading will not intercept ground water; therefore, the project will not alter the direction of or rate of flow of ground waters or change the quality of ground waters through direct additions or withdrawals or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations. The amount of water use by the completed project will constitute an increase from the current use of the property. The City of El Segundo Water Conservation Ordinance which regulates water usage requires a submittal of a detailed conservation plan. The water conservation plan will ensure that there is no significant impact to the supply of water otherwise available for public water supplies. The construction of multiple family residential structures (28 dwelling units) and the increase in paving for the associated driveways and walkways would increase the amount of absorption and decrease the amount of surface water runoff, when compared to the current industrial use as the lot is now covered with paving and buildings. The impact of the approved project will be modified further by landscaped areas around the structures. In addition, the project must meet city standards for on -site drainage, so the impacts to water runoff for the approved project are not anticipated to be significant. 5. AIR QUALITY No change in impact on air quality is anticipated as part of the project extension. The air quality impacts were addressed in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the original project. The approved 28 -unit condominium project would provide parking for 92 cars and may cause an increase in air emissions over the existing use as the larger of the existing industrial buildings is currently used for storing inoperative automobiles. During construction of the condominiums, exhaust from the excavation, building and asphalt removal could also cause objectionable odors. Construction equipment must be maintained so that it meets SCAQMD air quality standards. Dust will be required to be controlled in accordance with demolition and grading permits to be issued by the Department of Planning and Building Safety. Grading will be 3 00 0 4' discontinued during first -stage smog alerts and suspended during period of high wind (i.e. over 15 miles per hour) in accordance with SCAOMD requirements. All hauling trucks shall have loads covered or wetted and loaded below the sideboards to minimize dust. These are short term impacts associated with all construction projects and they are not considered to be significant. Once the project is completed, the activities associated with a multi - family residential use will not alter air movement, moisture, or temperature; and will not result in any regional or local change in climate. 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION No change in impact on transportation/circulation is anticipated as part of the project extension. A Traffic Impact Study was prepared as part of the SEIR to fully study the transportation and circulation impacts of the project. There may be a demand for new on- street parking from visitors and additional cars of the residents, however, the project would provide three (3) spaces per unit, although only two are required, and eight (8) visitor parking spaces. Condition No. 17 of City Council Resolution No. 3811, which approved the original project, included a provision for the payment of a transportation impact fee to partially offset the cost of citywide traffic improvements, upon the approval of the traffic impact fee Ordinance. On May, 21, 1996, the City Council adopted the traffic impact fee mitigation program (Resolution No. 3969) contemplated by Condition No. 17. Therefore, the property will be subject to the traffic fees contain in the Resolution No. 3969. The project would replace one driveway curb cut on Kansas Street with a smaller driveway, thereby increasing on- street parking on Kansas Street. A new curb cut on Grand Avenue was approved for Fire Department emergency access only. There may be an increase in vehicle trips from the increased residential units as the site is primarily used for storage. The approved project will not have any affect on existing transportation systems. The bus systems will be able to absorb any additional ridership as a result of the project which will only added 28 housing units to the City. These is also no reason to believe that the project will impact waterboume, rail, or air traffic other than possible supplying some ridership to the Metro Green Line. 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES No change in impact on biological resources is anticipated as part of the project extension. The project site is currently developed and is located in an urbanized area of Los Angeles County. There are no agricultural crops or rare or endangered species at the site. Project implementation includes enhancement of the property with landscaping which will include plant species which are typical to the area. Significant impacts on plant life are not anticipated. There are no fish or wildlife habitats located on the project site; and no unique, rare or endangered species exits on site. The project site and surrounding area is urbanized and is not used for the migration or movement of wildlife. Enhancement of the site with landscaping will provide improved habitat for small species of animals common to urbanized areas. Significant changes in the diversity or numbers of species will not occur as a result of the project. Significant impacts with regard to animal life are not anticipated. 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES No change in impact on energy and mineral resources is anticipated as part of the project extension. The implementation of the project will not substantially increase the rate of use of any natural 4 resource because of the limited scale of the project. The construction or occupation of the 28 -unit condominiums will not substantially deplete any non - renewable natural resource. The project construction of 28 condominium units will not require substantial amounts of fuel or energy for the construction. The completed project will require electricity but will not require substantial amounts of electricity or new sources of electricity above what would be required to operate other uses permitted at the project site. 9. HAZARDS No change in impact on hazards is anticipated as part of the project extension. The approved project may be affected by the release of hazardous substances due to the industrial nature of previous uses on the site. The impacts on Human Health were addressed in the SEIR and found to be insignificant. The large structure on the south side of the site currently houses a automobile service company and a warehouse /office. It is not known what chemicals may have been used by previous tenants, which included a manufacturer of greeting card display stands. The Draft SEIR for the condominium complex to the west (EA -138, Grand Tropez) indicated possible soil contamination along the abandoned railroad right -of -way that runs along the top of the berm at the north end of the property. The soil was treated in the past with a chemical (possibly arsenic) to kill weeds which resulted in no vegetation growing along the right -of -way. Two abandoned oil wells were identified as well, one on the west side of the Grand Tropez site and one on the east side virtually on the property line with the proposed project. The approved project will add to the residential population of the city which may be affected by a emergency response plan or evacuation plan, but the project will not hinder transportation during an evacuation. Emergency access gates will be provided along Grand Avenue enable a quick response to a potential emergency at the project location. Due to the nature of the project, no hazardous materials will be used or stored on the property other than small quantities of typical household chemicals. The previous use of the property includes industrial uses which may have used chemicals on site that may have contaminated the soil at the north end of the property. As part of the SEIR, sub - surface soil investigation was required to ensure hazardous materials listed by the State of California Department of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency, which would potentially impact human health, do not contaminate the property. Any contamination will have to be remediated prior to construction of the project. 10. NOISE No change in noise impacts are anticipated as part of the project extension. The noise impacts were addressed in the SEIR and found to be insignificant. The project residents may be subjected to noise from the light industrial uses to the east across Kansas Street, south across Grand Avenue, and from the industrial use to the north across the earthen bem. The Noise Element of the General Plan indicates the site is located between 60 dBA and 65 dBA CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) contours. This noise exposure is considered conditionally acceptable for residential use. The State of California has established sound insulation standards for multiple - family residential construction (CCR Title 24) that require protection from exterior noise sources so that the 24 -hour average level does not exceed 45 dBA CNEL. Problems can be minimized to a non - significant level by incorporating mitigation measures to require conformance with State standards with verification by the City via certified acoustical analysis of the design plans prior to construction, and field measurements in the dwelling units prior to occupancy. 5 A04 Noise levels will increase temporarily during demolition of the two existing structures and the construction of the approved 28 condominium units. This will most directly impact the residents of the 88 -unit condominiums to the west of the property. Construction hours will be limited to 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. The noise associated with the construction of the project should not adversely impact the industrial uses to the north, south and the east of the property because they tend to produce noise of their own and will not tend to be disturbed by construction noise. Construction equipment should be equipped with mufflers to help mitigate noise impacts. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES No change in impact on public services is anticipated as part of the project extension. The increase in population associated with the approved project has the potential to increase public services demand which include police, fire, library services, and parks and recreation facilities. The overall environmental impact will probably be minor, based on the small scope of the project. The project will be assessed the standard one -time mitigation fee for fire, police, and library services. The direct impacts of the project on the school system is likely to be significant as schools were identified as being directly impacted in the EIR for the Holly Park Townhomes condominium project. The cumulative impact of other projects which have impacted the level of services required of public agencies were addressed in the SEIR and found to be insignificant. 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS No change in impact on utilities and service systems is anticipated as part of the project extension. The approved use could create a demand for more utility services which could impact the existing power, natural gas, communications, water and sewer facilities, and solid waste and disposal. The condominiums may tax the existing utility systems to a greater extent than the previous uses because the condominiums will use all the utility systems 24 hours a day while the site currently operates during the daytime only. The impacts on utilities were addressed in the SEIR and found to be insignificant. The approved 28 -units are subject to the City's Sewer Allocation Ordinance and would use some of the 6,868 gallons per quarter allocated to the City of El Segundo (City of Los Angeles' Hyperion treatment plan) during any three -month quarter and may displace other residential projects. The allocation system is based on a first -come, first -served basis, however, any units that do not receive an allocation need only wait until the next quarter. The City's Sewer Master Plan indicates that the available capacity of existing systems varies significantly from area to area: because of the localized variation in capacity, an analysis of sewer system impact of the proposed project; including impacts elsewhere in the system was required. The impacts were addressed in the SEIR. The amount of solid waste produced by the approved project will be limited by the City's adopted Integrated Waste Management Plan which proposed to divert 25% of its waste by 1995 and 50% by the year 2000. Based on waste generation studies, this project will produce 896 pounds of waste per week (32 pounds per unit per week). The implementation of the Source Reduction Recycling Element (SRRE) and the Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) will help to mitigate the impacts of solid waste and disposal. The impacts of solid waste were also addressed in the SEIR. 6 v0l'45 13. AESTHETICS No change in impact on aesthetics is anticipated as part of the project extension. The approved project, five two -story structures over a semi- subterranean garage level, will alter the present viewing patterns for the existing industrial buildings, the approved two -story condominiums to the north, and the one and two -story single - family residential structures farther north across Holly Avenue. The adjacent three -story condominium structures to the west (Grand Tropez) will also be affected. The SEIR included a study to compare the height of the approved project to the surrounding properties. The project has been designed to lower the retaining wall facing the adjacent property to the north to help mitigate shadow problems. The retaining wall will still measure over six feet in height. None the less, the finished grade at the garage level of the units facing the property to the north will be about 15 feet higher than the finished grade of the abutting property. There may be an increase in nighttime light and glare from the new three -story residential structures as seen from the existing multiple - family residential structures on the west side of the property and property on the north side of the subject property. However, it is not anticipated to be significant as most lighting would be interior and exterior lighting fixtures are required to be shielded and oriented downwards to minimize spill -over light to adjacent properties. An exterior lighting plan is required to be reviewed and approved by the City to ensure there will be no light or glare impacts on surrounding properties. 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES No change in impact on cultural resources is anticipated as part of the project extension. The project will have no impact on any cultural, archeological, or religiously significant site. As part of another recent project (EA -266, nitrogen pipeline), an archeological records survey was conducted which indicated there is no evidence of any culturally significant sites within two miles of this project's location. Additionally, the subject property is a completely developed site, previously graded and disturbed so there is little chance of any cultural resources being found on -site. Should any previously un- recorded cultural resources be encountered during the construction of the fill, all work will be stopped and a qualified archeologist will be consulted to determine the potential significance of the find. 15. RECREATION No change in impact on recreation is anticipated as part of the project extension. The new residents of the approved project may cause an incremental demand for the use of the City's recreation facilities, however, all residents are subject to the associated user fees required on some of the facilities. There may be cumulative impact of this and other projects on recreation facilities. The impacts were addressed in the SEIR and found to be insignificant. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE The proposed project is a low intensity use of a industrial site located in an urban setting. Therefore, the project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment and will not achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long -term environmental goals. 7 p: \projects \426- 450\ea439Jsr 00 46 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 350 Main Street AND BUILDING SAFETY El Segundo, CA 90245 (310) 322 -4670 FAX (310) 322 -4167 Project #_EA -439. SUB 98-2 BACKGROUND 1. Project Title: One Year Extension of Vesting Tentative Tract Man No. 51109 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of El Segundo. 350 Main Street. El Segundo. CA 90245 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Paul Garry. Assistant Planner (310) 322 -4670 Ext. 399 4. Project Location: 1415 East Grand Avenue 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Jim Kizirian 1605 E. Grand Avenue. El Segundo, CA 90245 6. General Plan Designation: Smo4 Hollow Mixed Use. with Medium Density Residential Overlay 7. Zoning: Medium Manufacturing (MM) with Medium Density Residential (MDR) Overlay 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessar)) The proposed project is a request for a one (1) year extension to a previously approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map and associated approvals for a 28 -unit condominium project to be constructed at 1415 East Grand Avenue. The purpose of the extension is to allow additional time for the development of the project. The project was originally approved by the City Council on May 4, 1993. No changes in the project are proposed. The original Vesting Tentative Tract Map and associated approvals required approval of an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 92121062), which was certified by the City Council on May 4, 1993. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings) The surrounding property consists of light industrial uses in an urban setting to the north, south, and east. To the west are multi - family residential units. 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.): None 1 II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, Involving at least one Impact that Is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning Population and Housing — Geological Problems Water Air Quality Transportation/Circulation III. DETERMINATION: Biological resources Energy and Mineral Resources Hazards Noise Mandatory Findings of Significance Public Service Utilities and Service Systems Aesthetics Cultural Resources Recreation On the basis of this Initial Study of Environmental Impact, the Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo finds the following: X That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures, as described on an attached sheet, have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the impact is "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. find that although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to an earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Bret B. lern4rd, Al Directo of Plannintand Building Safety Secretary of the Planning Commission City of El Segundo ei �r"y 19 16 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all answers are required on attached sheets) 3 G01f;4 Potentially Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources) Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. • Land Use Planning. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? X b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction X over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? X d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from X incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (include a low- income or X minority community)? 2. Population and Housing. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? X b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an X undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? C) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? X 3. Geologic Problems. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? X b) Seismic ground shaking? X C) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? X d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? X e) Landslides or mudflows? X f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil X conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? X h) Expansive soils? X 1) Unique geologic or physical features? X 3 G01f;4 5 0 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than ISSUES (and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4. Water. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, X or the rate and amount of surface runoff? . b) Exposure of people or property to water related X hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration X of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any X water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction X of water movements? f) Change in the quality of ground waters, either X through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capacity? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? X h) Impacts to groundwater quality? X 1) Substantial reduction in the amount of X groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? 5. Air Quality. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to X an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? X c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, X or cause any changes in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? X 6. -Transportation/Circulation. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? X b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., X sharp curves or dangerous intersections or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to X nearby uses? 5 0 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than ISSUES (and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? X e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or X bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting X alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? X 7. Biological Resources. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their X habitats (including, but not limited to, plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage X trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., X oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and X vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? X 8. Energy and Mineral Resources. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation X plans? b) Use non - renewable resources in a wasteful and X inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known X mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? 9. Hazards. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of X hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency X response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential X health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of X potential health hazards? 000)5? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than ISSUES (and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable X brush, grass, or trees? 10. Noise. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? X b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 11. Public Services. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? X b) Police protection? X c) Schools? X d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X e) Other governmental services? X 12. Utilities and Service Systems. Would the .proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X b) Communications systems? X c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution X facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? X e) Storm water drainage? X f) Solid waste disposal? X g) Local or regional water supplies? X 13. Aesthetics. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? X b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? X c) Create light or glare? X 14. Cultural Resources. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? X b) Disturb archaeological resources? X 000)5? 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. On May 4, 1993, the City Council of the City of El Segundo certified an Environmental Impact Report (State 7 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than ISSUES (and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Affect historical resources? X d) Have the potential to cause a physical change X which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within X the potential impact area? 15. Recreation. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or X regional parks or other recreational facilities? a) Affect existing recreational opportunities? X 16. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade X the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve X short-term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are X individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in conjunction with the effects of past projects, the effects of .other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects X which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. On May 4, 1993, the City Council of the City of El Segundo certified an Environmental Impact Report (State 7 Clearinghouse No. 92121962) and adopted mitigation measures for the project (EA -285, Subdivision 98-2/Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51109, Smoky Hollow Site Plan 92 -1, Variance 92 -2) consisting of the construction of 28 townhouse style condominium units on an 1.59 acre parcel at the northwest comer of Grand Avenue and Kansas Street (1415 East Grand Avenue). b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The scope of the project has not been increased by the proposed one year extension to the Tentative Vesting Tract Map. Therefore, all the impacts in the checklist above were adequately addressed in the previously certified EIR. However, due to the fact that the original EIR was certified five years ago, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts has been prepared to address all potential impacts. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. P:\P ROJ ECTS \426 - 450 \EA439 \EA439. I S C 8 C0D5f. 0 Srour & Associates v Business and Real Estate Development Services March 30, 1998 LAURIE B. JESTER, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Building Safety Department City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 SUBJECT: 1415 East Grand Avenue, VTTM 51109 Dear Ms. Jester: lizabeth C. Srour rancene Baker Uralman 1001 6th Street, Suite 110 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 (310) 372 -8433 (310) 372 -8894 FAX � @Nov !� i MAR 3 0 1998 jr 1 "L This correspondence is submitted on behalf of Jim Kizirian, owner of the subject property. Pursuant to information provided to us in your letters of October 29, 1997, and February 19, 1998, we hereby request a one year extension of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map 51109. It is our understanding based on information contained in your letters that the Subdivider is entitled to this one year extension . pursuant to Section 19.04. 150 of the El Segundo Subdivision Code, and that granting of this extension will protect all development rights presently associated with this project. Mr. Kizirian does intend to proceed with his project, however, the Final Tract Map will not be recorded prior to the May 14, 1998, expiration date. Thank you for your assistance in this matter, and please advise if any further information is needed in order to process this request. Sincerely, �Aietl�, s, alm- ELIZAB TH SROUR On Behalf Of Tim Kizirian attachment: VTTM 51109 cc: Tim Kizirian - 1605 East Grand Ave., El Segundo Matt Kroha - 4821 Elmdale, RHE 90274 John Riahi, Civil Engineer - 22630 Leyte Drive, Torrance 90505 Douglas Leach, Architect - 119 W. Torrance Blvd. #22, RB 90277 00`,155 drc\1413\e)d -01. EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 21, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Additional discussion concerning purchase of trash cans for placement on Main Street. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: For uniformity, capacity and increased coverage, select Option 1: Purchase 30 new 42 gallon (31 gallon interior) cans and relocate the old, still usable cans to other locations throughout the City. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: At its June 2, 1998 Council meeting, Council request additional information about the purchase of new trash cans on Main Street. Attached to this report is that information and a catalogue picture of the recommended type of trash can. DISCUSSION: ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Memorandum from John Hilton, General Services Manager Picture from Wausau Tile catalogue FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget: X Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: $13,800 Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required - Yes_ No X ORIGINATED: Date: July 10, 1y)vb mmond, Acting ty Manager ACTION TAKEN: trashstaffrp.fm city o/ aseyundo INTER - DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE Date: July 16, 1998 To: Tim Grimmond, City Manager From: John W. Hilton, General Services Manager Subject: Main Street Trash Cans At the Council meeting held June 2, 1998, the Council requested an estimate for the cost to replace the existing trash cans on Main Street, and for placing additional cans where needed. This would eliminate any damaged or unattractive cans and provide one standardized type of can. The replaced cans would be evaluated and any cans which are still useable could be utilized in other locations throughout the City. The cost estimate of $14,000 (see attached memo dated 06/09/98) was based on replacing all 25 of the current 20 gallon cans on Main Street with 25 larger 42 gallon cans (with removable 31 gallon interior can), plus 5 additional 42 gallon (31 gallon interior) cans, at locations where these cans may be needed. Broken down, the estimated cost for purchasing 30 cans is $12,000.00, and $1,800.00 per year for Zakaroff to empty the additional cans. This estimate is based on replacing the cans with a similar type of can which includes an exposed aggregate concrete outer container (42 gallon), and a removable 31 gallon inner can. This would increase the capacity of the cans by 55 %. If the larger 42 gallon (31 gallon interior) can is selected, the 5 additional cans may not be required. If this option is preferred, the City may purchase 25 cans, then staff can monitor the location where additional capacity is required. If additional cans are needed, they can be purchased at a later date. Attached is a catalog and price sheet from Wausau Tile which shows cans similar to the ones currently on Main Street. The cost estimate is based on Model 1170 on page 14 of the catalog. Based on the concerns raised at the Council meeting held on July 7, 1998 concerning the Main Street trash can replacement, the following are suggested options: Estimated Cost tion 1: Purchase 30 new 42 gallon (31 gallon interior) cans and relocate the old, still usable cans to other locations throughout the City. $12,000 Additional service from Zakaroff Recycling Services. 1,800 C 0 '� 5 Tim Grimmond, City Manager July 15, 1998 Main Street Trash Cans Page 2 Option 2: Purchase 25 new cans and relocate the old cans which are still reusable to other locations throughout the City. 10,000 Additional service from Zakaroff Recycling Services. This cost will vary depending on the number of additional cans. 1,500 Option 3: Purchase only 5 new 42 gallon (31 gallon interior) cans and place them where needed. $ 2,000 Additional service from Zakaroff Recycling Services. 300 Option 4: Replace only 7 of the 20 gallon cans which are damaged or significantly different from the majority, with 7 new 42 gallon (31 gallon interior) cans. 2,800 Option 5: Replace 7 of the damaged 20 gallon cans, and purchase 5 of the 42 gallon (31 gallon interior) cans to be placed at locations where needed. 4,800 Additional service form Zakaroff Recycling Services. 300 Please let me know which option should be implemented. If additional information is required, please contact me at extension 295. Attachments: Memo dated 06109/98 Waussau Tile catalog Waussau Tile List Prices MWcMadminishmainst02.idc 0 01�JF City, o/ asequndo INTER- DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE Date: June 9, 1998 To: Jim Morrison, City Manager From: Eduard Schroder, Public Works Director Subject: Main Street Trash Cans At the Council meeting held on June 2, 1998, the Council requested an estimate for the cost of replacing the existing trash cans on Main Street and of adding additional cans where needed. At the present time, the cost to provide this replacement and the additions would be $14,000.00. m ntfd9B\streetsVrascans. idc 00959 W26 Heavy duty container with aluminum or plastic tops M j TF1180 TF1165 TF1175 A TF1170 TF1160 New product designs are our specialty. Let our talented staff of designers and engineers assist you in designing the product that will meet your specific needs. Standard Terra -Form products can be customized by blending a unique color or surface or identified with your logo. TF1177 Custom Logo * TF1176 26" Dia. x 44" 700 lbs. / 31 gal. 44° Options: Al, B1 Shown in: Sand - Weatherstone _26" Custom Logo T * TF1180 1 26" Dia. x 38" 38^ 700 lbs. / 31 gal. Options: A 1, 111 Shown in: Tan - - -- w/ Gray Matrix zs° - TF1165 26" Dia. x 44° 44" 675 lbs. / 42 gal. Options: A1, BI Shown in: Mistti Gray w/ Gray - -- zs° _ Matrix T- T * TF1177 26" Dia. x 37" 26" Dia. x 33" 37" L 700 lbs. / 31 gal. Options: Al, B1 Shown in: Tan -. 1 w/ Gray Matrix 26" Shown In: Gray * TF1176 26" Dia. x 44" 700 lbs. / 31 gal. 44° Options: Al, B1 Shown in: Sand - Weatherstone _26" Custom Logo T * TF1180 1 26" Dia. x 38" 38^ 700 lbs. / 31 gal. Options: A 1, 111 Shown in: Tan - - -- w/ Gray Matrix zs° - TF1165 26" Dia. x 44° 44" 675 lbs. / 42 gal. Options: A1, BI Shown in: Mistti Gray w/ Gray - -- zs° _ Matrix T- * TF1175 26" Dia. x 33" 33' 7 675 lbs. / 31 gal. L Options: Al, B1 Shown In: Gray zs Weatherstone LIZ TF1170 26" Dia. x 44" 44' 675 lbs. / 42 gal. Options: Al, B1 1 Shown in: Tan w/ Gray Matrix 26 TF1160 26" Dia. x37' 37" 675 lbs. / 42 gal. Options: Al, B1 Shown in: Brown Weatherstone 26" * Liner Included x;0'00 WASTE CONTAINER L 71 :: TF1083 TF1085 TF1090 TF 1095 CODE NUMBER TF1075 TIF 1080 TF1081 WCC-FTL WCC-LPTL WCC-DTL L WCC-PLPTL Dia. � 44� DESCRIPTION W269*269 W269*26 W269 *26 24' �Dia. x 37' 24; Di,. , 33' 24' Dia, 35' 2a" SIZE 26 Dia, x 40" — 26' Dia. x 40 Al, Bt Al, BI — Al, B 1, Bi COLOR CODE Al, 81 Al. BI 450 lus. 131 gal. 4W lbs. / 31 gal. 450 lbs. / 31 2al 4bO lbs. 131 gal --iff-T CAPACITY 4951 495 lbs. / 42 gal. $350 $318 $331 JAU0 $425 UST —PRICE $320 $326 TF1115 CODE NUMBER TF1100 TF1105 TF1110 WLIIWC-FTL DESCRIPTION WCC-PDTL W27S-W275L W27S-S_ -W27SL 27" Dia. x 36" Dia. x 36" — SIZE 24" x 44- 27' 27" Da. " 36" B1 BI I�Ey Al, BI BI — — 530 lbs. 125 gal. 17 R P CIT 53019125 gal.— 0 lbs. / 25 0— FJOC=A $407 $413 $468 ITSf 'PRICE $331 TF1117 TF1120 TF1125 —F6W268-W26 CL-FTL --W26 8WO26 —7 -Dia _x4g" 29" x 36" 267 D'a , 42 A BI l, B1 595 lbs / 53 gal 530 lbs. $360 $468 $335 77n 77 L ------ TF1140 TF1145 TF1150 TF1151 TF1155 — — WCF-ATL CODE NUMBER TF1 130 TF1135 26 W263 W263-W263L W2684269 W268-W268L W263-WO26 W263-W *269 --T6; Dia x 36' 26 Da x 39' 26" Dia. x 47" DESCRIPTION 26. Dia. x 38. 276 7Dia — — Al. B1 x 40- 26" Dia. x 47" SIZE 21FDia. x _49' A Al, U1 Al, 615 lbs, i 30 gal COLOR CODE 1, 81 Al, BI 640 lbs. / 53 ga.l. Eioii A �4O lbs 1'53 gal, _ :]64010 $399 $456 —W— $373 $368 . / CAPACITY 595 lbs. / 53 gal. 595 lbs. / 41 gal, $321 —UST —PRICE $344 $- 360 CODE NUMBER TF1156 TF1160 TF1165 DESCRIPTION WCF-ATUSnuffer W26-WO26 W26*269 SIZE 26' � Dia. x 3T __T67Da x 37 26' Dia x W OR CODE Al, B1 Al - B1 COu' 730 lbs, 142 gt— 730 lbs. 6t51 / 30 gal. $368 — CAPACITY $348 CE .,,TPRICE $470 TF1175 W W26-Recess IL 26*26 26" Dia, x 44" 26" Dia. Al, B1 EiME 73010 131 al. $373 $371 71180 TF1185 W26-Cast Aluminum/L WLIWC-FTL 26" Dia x 38" 29 Dia, x 34" q— l B1 730 lbs. / 31 gal, 75010 $448 $443 0 0 10 G 1. TO THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT MEETING DATE: July 21, 1998 AGENDA HEADING: COMMITTEES Agenda Description: Schedule Interviews of candidates for Planning Commission and Community Advisory Committee ( "CCBs "), with filing deadline set for 48 hours prior to interviews. Recommended Council action: Set date of interviews for 6:30 p.m., Tuesday, August 4, 1998. Introduction and Background: The City is currently recruiting to fill the following vacancies on the City's committees, commissions and boards. Commissions Committees & Boards # & expiration of Vacancies / Applications Received to date Planning Commission 1 position exp 6130 one Community Cable Advisory Committee 1 position exp 10131* one ( *) Depending on results of School District election to be held July 28, 1998, position may be vacant prior to expiration date. Discussion:. City Council continued the recruitment for Planning Commission vacancy and opened recruitment for Community Cable Advisory Committee on July 7, 1998, without setting date of interviews. The vacancies are being advertised in the Community Calendar section of the El Segundo Herald, on Community Cable T.V. Bulletin Board, and on the City's Water bills. Attached Supporting Documents And Who Prepared Them: Fiscal Impact: N/A Originator: Date: July 15, 1998 Ju is Abreu Mason, Council Assistant Date: July 15, 1998 Reviewed by: )C''6 nAccb\.setintrw.798 • ; i_! • Ed TO: MARLE" BAKER FROM: IKE GORDON RE: AGEND SUBJECTS DATE: �ULY 16, 1998 Marlene, m subjects for the agenda include: COMMISSION COMMITTEES AND BO 1. Appoi t a Senior Taskforce to develop recommendations for the City Counc 1 on how to assist E1 Segundo seniors. Z. Appoilt a Business Taakforce to study audit procedures for the Citys tollaction of business related taxes. 1. Aak t e Parks and Recreation Department to develop a plan to build a do park within the city limits. n i, 0 tl_ 6, 10 O = W D s 3I , +1 +! m > '1. m � =^ m t- T r .. a1 r O :X1 A -I W ro r0 -•. td -• _..O I 3 L. O � I1 Ii I1 Y ;1 it V ro O3+Cr -1 z \ D r= r v "a n y,A r 0 n A 3 bl y 0 b r Z ] ►' •[ O '1 'A •• a V C y inr3 rn � c N L 9 A] o O c A Ay O tea .r y N]] O t r .. .a N A •c C A O B r. A .t .t •► y A „.i W C z z r O c7 Tn 0z :03 .A 4 n +b O ] a az .t to 7 o y 4 0 o c 1 Z z 1 r t7 .+ •4 a y A IA y < yA ". n .► r '•' O r CL .r 00 l7 .• r 0.4 C.4Ay� A O 7 it < x G v n A Z n r A .1n n AV .+y »t A r o m A cav] <a ! ,e _y ,p v bl a 4 c to --1 r v +y o A I , A Y A N A A y V m .4 \\ A to A < r A y o 3 ] N A H rs 7 A A Q< „ 7 y A r Ole C N n •r .c , c i A • Y . , V O n A 7 A 0 r n A m- a OO 0 ON < 400.4 " N yr to ] v N n 14 A 3 V +p •4 7 n ] O N Ni "1 A 0 A A n]` 7 y 7 0 N Y r 7 to Nanroa CL '1 L m Ar.o a o r•vro ] O `7 N m d rri'n r N A 7 C r m ,a ►t.. n J , r. 7 n 0 7 3 � D z D L Q fU 00 L l�l M11 A Lq ro O v 1J r 4 N ge V r v V 1 < .T 0 o 1 t7 m 7 i T II u i ] 1 0 r 7 C 3 •gyp K A to 0 y 1yi a ,0 p K A ] O A m •�4 w C .+ N ro It y +p K M O. A O yn m a m y r n y4 :V rt ro N y " 1 y o Y• j N M In Its :r N r' x v o N r+ ] Y• I ro to p N .r A p a ^I Al to am ro a N n A •e o n y A N r V � f = rrl.• - Y .f T o y y A D rov W '1 N O ro < • s+ r+ A A `D G a y ro n U n C t �'f�I-�1wL1•:. , ;.I_;:�;.,I,�.I � I .I � I I .I I I I o H 1 n c ti A z _1 7 .4 m o -n O al r y N N •0 rl .1 N a o s-i a 3 A O C) ro r Y r m y a m y A M rp .+ n ,n n , o 7 A c o ] y -1 f ro r O o n o ] -n .c r o �n ••* Y rf Dr 7 �' ry A x A N g A . p r• N Y M y n c A '7 ? j A y n O N n v. .r r. .+ 7 + N A a A a a < < a 7 a Y r• O �. al a• N cr O �+ � � A 0 x ] M � A of Lnn -�o+ n;n.b i rood, n,- .om t•Iw� w . c •. m o . . . In ;.� p� o .a Co o In -' In n o a� ' .n QW a +A h n5 m w w c, W OA I r1 r +n oil 61 r. z h rJ D ^I m O V W w rp -I rn 7i 3• :I 1+ .il t r" w c r- rU v1 •.0 rp -a 'n s 3I , +1 +! m > '1. a 1„I FYI. -{ I I =^ m t- > c -n r .. a1 r a; :X1 -� J •� in •-• -I W ro r0 -•. td -• _..O I 3 L. lrl ' =` y .n Y ;1 it yX:.�orr t c GinCrrl ro O3+Cr -1 z mmro T m m 1 -� .1 �-tr,� r3r, r�r+o.o od > „ r ra•+ ocrrc,o,nTrr mm -+zC-i zzc t� - .O inr3 rn � z tea r� T-C < -/D OC3 r xmD z z r O c7 Tn 0z ccIn z az 1 Z z 1 r t7 - m < r m r O r it I, mm n r T C +n vi �1 M � A of Lnn -�o+ n;n.b i rood, n,- .om t•Iw� w . c •. m o . . . In ;.� p� o .a Co o In -' In n o a� ' .n QW a +A h n5 m w w c, W OA I r1 r +n oil 61 r. z h rJ D ^I m O V W w rp -I rn 7i 3• :I 1+ .il t r" w c r- rU v1 •.0 rp 0 SCR v e a ! m i t7 a m at a c N 9 7 .r W ro ro .I O < A a c K n A K 3 W w i m r aropro c mlm uoilo wK O '1 ro •• I3 '7 w Ur Nll ? y C o a C s oro ro � oro do 7rolw n n � w A •: O • n 3 7 3I IG .r .am ' < " y ..yyIm 7�.a .y rylA -�NI -1 o; CL C�NI c N VAN w N W X C ro I a .+ nl n- A ro Y -)I cal O $m o� 7I Wit' OI �' 3U.+yoA�w'-' y N ro w M T y IO n 9 T 0 in %C! :a 1 OI 7 7 N 3 n 'O vev,m - Finroln a. ro `hIA A CI In < � ^ Ind � ro •`I In N L. w nl in ^ 3Fi R O " wl r 34ro M • ImIn I W -4 K < 0 m w0 Ir;an 0I3 w'TT L ? m In q � » . r L ti 0 7 rl 9• C •r � •+ .4 W w to WT Iq 7 CrylW O. 7 a i i i I I { , NI ,a.,< �-. :0 of a �I pnl N "10 �I $ N mlro c ZI r- 0 � '10 n � 3 roK�A 19 j O I y O IoI N 61 a cn, KA µ el --h a9 robi K +�a j! o -11 n o ni ro 7 < K ry ;i m w y wl n yr r TI N �I w 7 nd o 71 N �••! 'i .fl VIW w i c 'li m A N I A 19 w y a 7Im ur OL N 3 N r M K M i i i I i In O y A. A a N 'D Ch -4G1: R. l^ O .L W C C4 - G I I I l .n i � I '•� I I i i I I I I to 0 5 z M, 0 A T 1+ r r c r o t ro a D -� sy mm �o o ; � m .s g .o q ml �:L_7 �"'� C11 (n I yl ni 01 I Z a I T I 3 b r: t y: 2 -r M : at > mZ Z c' r, In m L Kl i I a ` " r I .. W Ir ;o y NI I or r C I-. s.m -� T T moo' m ZA m ja�mmminIj ^_ oac r.�J 0 3 OI�Z I�cc�ooa =IW Wro w C A _n 7m m nIra jar. 3 N � wn l N N T ,N. T n� l n � Ow ' _ y Oo x�vO ADD V. m = I j a>C -") Z y n c omnts m�l M ^ n I — - i � ro3 r• -,r ry.r ° O. •*I n. r�q MCr -4 c -a :{ In i r ��- +..I... xMT .: mo r3Tlac iI .m.. rt-xl Co V -<` - Im yl i micr cn T mr{ cnrnror 'tmroao �1 ml , Ia(]c3mm j OIIcI i Tim03cm -n --4 a c <mm -4=-I N. �-I � n ci z .i „c= o ti I Z p N. ry n•, m' A N'I �I m � m Cell w di m rn C7 n Ev A i � q � r,� m •-I 1 � I �9 O I I w L I M r7 l i r; w M w r; n; r N r, m .1 W IV N i �otnwlnro+»coc o I s, 3c.— Ln• -i7, 10 Ch -4G1: R. l^ O .L W C C4 - G I I I l .n i � I '•� I I i i I I I I to 0 5 z M, 0 A T 1+ r r c r o t ro a D -� sy mm �o o ; � m .s g .o q ml �:L_7 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER 07/01/98 THROUGH 07/14/98 Date Payee Amount Description 07/01 Healthcomp 1,180.45 Weekly eligible claims week ending 06/30/98 07/08 Healthcomp 384.62 Weekly eligible claims week ending 07/07/98 07/10 Wells Fargo 30,000.00 Transfer Funds for Worker's Comp. 07/10 W.B.M.W.D. 735,855.60 Water Payment for May 1998 - 07/13 IRS 151,338.97 Federal Payroll Taxes P/R # 1 07/13 Emp. Dev. Dept. 27,902.80 State Payroll Taxes P/R # 1 07/14 Federal Reserve 350.00 Employee Bond Purchase P/R # 1 DATE OF RATIFICATION: 07/21/98 TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE: Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by : City Treasurer Z�W&l Finance Director Ant�:� City Manager , — !/ -0 Date 7 Date � Date 711ii0 p Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo. 947,012.44 r 01)006 U MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 30,1998 - 4:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Gordon at 4:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember John Gaines ROLL CALL Mayor Gordon Mayor ProTem Jacobs Councilmember Wernick Councilmember Gaines Councilmember McDowell - Present - Present - Present - Present - Present PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total.) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $25o. No individuals addressed Council CLOSED SESSION: The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, et M.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation; and/or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as follows: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a)) - NONE CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(b): -0- potential case (no further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c): -1- matters. DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) - Recruitment interviews for City Manager RECESS AT 8:00 P.M. RECONVENED, JULY 1, 1998 AT 5:00 P.M. ALL MEMBERS PRESENT RECESS AT 7:55 p,m, RECONVENED, JULY 2,1998 AT 7:30 A.M. ALL MEMBERS PRESENT COUNCILMEMBER WERNICK ARRIVED AT 8:30 a.m. 1 06- 30- 98.4pm CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957.6) - Meet with negotiator for the Supervisory and Professional Employees Association (Local 911 of the Teamsters AFLCIO), the General Employees Association (El Segundo City Employees Association), and the unrepresented employees (James Morrison). CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) - None REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required) PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. MEEPNG ADJOURNED at 11:30 a.m. to July 7, 1998 at 5:00 P.M. dy�o&aen, City Clerk 00'168 2 06- 30- 98.4pm MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 7,1998 - 5:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Gordon at 5:00 P,M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Kelly McDowell. ROLL CALL Mayor Gordon - Present Mayor ProTem Jacobs - Present Councilmember Wernick - Present arrived at 5:10 P.M. Councilmember Gaines - Present Councilmember McDowell - Present PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total.) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. No individuals addressed Council SPECIAL MATTER: Appointment of real property negotiator relating to the acquisition of parking in the vicinity of Richmond and Holly Streets. MOVED by Councilmember McDowell, SECONDED by Councilmember Gaines, to appoint Jim Hansen, Director of Economic Development as the City's real property negotiator relating to the acquisition of parking in the vicinity of Richmond and Holly Streets. MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOICE VOTE: AYES: MAYOR GORDON, COUNCILMEMBERS GAINES AND MCDOWELL, NOES: NONE. NOT - PARTICIPATING: MAYOR PROTEM JACOBS, ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER WERNICK. 3/0/1/1. CLOSED SESSION: The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, et M.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation; and/or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code'54957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as follows: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code'54956.9(a)) - 1. In the Matter of the Application of City of Los Angeles, OAH No. L- 9604014 2. Hill v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 030986 3. Hughes v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. BC 185210 4. Senior v. City of El Segundo, WCAB Unassigned 5. Mosleh & Greffon v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 025903 6. Fenwick v. Civil Service Commission and City of El Segundo, 2 Civil B121282 and Los Angeles No. BSO44667. trict, City of El Segundo, et al., LASC Case No. 7. City of Los Angeles v. County Sanitation Dis BC034185 t. 07- 07- 98.5pm CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(b): -1- potential case (no further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c): -2- matters. DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) - City Manager recruitment. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957.6) - Meet with negotiator for Supervisory and Professional Employees Association (Local 911 of the Teamsters AFLCIO) and the General Employees Association (El Segundo City Employees Association). CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) - Discussion with real property negotiator, James Hansen, relating to the acquisition of parking in the vicinity of Richmond and Holly Streets. REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required) Council returned to open session at 6:40 p.m. ALL MEMBERS PRESENT SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS - Interview applicants for City Treasurer position. Council interviewed one candidate. It was the consensus of Council to continue this item to the 7:00 p.m. meeting for the purpose of interviewing another candidate. ADJOURNMENT at 6:55 p.m. City Clerk 07- 07- 98.5pm 000'70 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 7, 1998 - 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Gordon at 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION - Father Joseph Azadian, S.J., Saint Anthony Roman Catholic Church. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Kelly McDowell. ROLL CALL Mayor Gordon - Present Mayor ProTem Jacobs - Present Councilmember Wernick - Present Councilmember Gaines - Present Councilmember McDowell - Present PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. Seven (7) individuals addressed Council: 1. Peggy Tyrell, resident, referred to the possible alignment of South Bay cities in opposition to LAX expansion. Mayor Gordon stated there will be a presentation on July 21, 1998 and encouraged attendance. In response to Ms. Tyrell's question, Jack Hilton, City Facilities advised that the trash cans on Main Street are made of concrete and stone; that the City is purchasing thirty cans at $350 each, and more will be added. 2. Ky Springer, resident, advised that the Red Cross will sponsor a blood drive at the Library's Matsui Room July 28, 1998 from 12:30 to 6:30 p.m., advising that appointments can be made by calling 310 322 -6926. 3. Liz Garnholtz, resident, addressed the "Gordon Report." 4. Peter Freeman, resident, addressed misinfomation about the Park Vista Senior Housing Board; and questioned selection of members and governing rules. 5. Sandra Mason, 331 Eucalyptus, referred to a proposed dog run in the "Gordon Report;" questioned Main Street signage prohibiting bikes and skateboards; and requested that the weeds in the gutters be taken care of. 6. Jane Friedkin, resident, spoke regarding the allocations for trash cans; requested more information regarding consent agenda item number 3; suggested the pursuit of a farmers 1 C,00T market; questioned the removal of LA Advisory Committee members; and referred to the City Treasurer replacement. 7. Frank Wong, resident, opposed time limits imposed on public speaking; and stated he has received no Council feedback regarding his previous comments on pollution. Mayor Gordon stated that copies of the Daily Breeze article regarding LAX expansion have been requested, and requested feedback from all five Councilmembers. A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only. MOVED by Councilmember Wernick, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510. MOVED by Councilmember Wernick, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, finding that the need arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda to add an item regardin expansion of Los Angeles International Airport. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0. Mayor Gordon read Resolution No. 4076 in its entirety. Liz Garnholtz, resident, supported the Resolution, and questioned if it will be politically driven and how it will be funded. Jane Friedkin, resident, referred to her service on Council committees, especially LAX. Frank Wong, resident, felt that many of the speakers have fought LAX for years. City Attorney Mark Hensley read the following: RESOLUTION NO. 4076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF LAX. MOVED by Councilmember Wernick, SECONDED by Councilmember Gaines, to adopt Resolution No. 4076. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0. 2 ITEM TAKEN OUT OF ORDER C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - 1. Council appointment to fill City Treasurer vacancy. Two candidates applied for the position. One candidate was interviewed during the previous 5:00 p.m. meeting. Since one candidate was unable to attend the 5:00 p.m. meeting, Council interviewed him at this time. (further consideration of this item was continued to later in the meeting). B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS - 1. Continued Public Hearing on Environmental Assessment EA -411 and Development Agreement Extension DA 97 -2 for a five (5) year extension of a Development Agreement for a 182 room hotel and six story, 290,000 square foot office building at 2301 -2381 Rosecrans and 810 -820 South Douglas Street. Applicant: Continental Development Corporation, Mr. Jerry Saunders. Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a public hearing on Environmental Assessment EA -411 and Development Agreement Extension DA 97 -2 for a five (5) year extension of a Development Agreement for a 182 room hotel and six story, 290,000 square foot office building at 2301 -2381 Rosecrans and 810 -820 South Douglas Street. Applicant: Continental Development Corporation, Mr. Jerry Saunders. He asked if proper notice had been given and if any written communications had been received. Clerk Mortesen stated that proper notice had been given and no written communications had been received. Bret Bernard, Director of Planning and Building Safety Department gave a brief staff report. No individuals addressed Council . Council consensus to close the public hearing. City Attorney Mark Hensley read the following: RESOLUTION NO. 4070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEUGNDO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A FIVE (5) YEAR EXTENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 97-2 FOR PROPERTY AT 2301 -2381 ROSECRANS AND 810 -820 SOUTH DOUGLAS STREET AND CERTIFICATION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA -411, PETITIONED BY CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. deletion of item number 4 under "NOW THEREFORE" section. MOVED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, SECONDED by Councilmember Wernick to adopt Resolution 00`) 1 h No 4070. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - Council appointment to fill City Treasurer vacancy. MOVED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell, to appoint Bill Bue to fill the unexpired term of the City Treasurer effective July 21, 1998 through April, 2000. MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOICE VOTE. AYES: MAYOR GORDON, MAYOR PROTEM JACOBS, COUNCILMEMBERS GAINES , AND MCDOWELL. NOES: COUNCILMEMBER WERNICK. 411. Councilmember Wernick requested that the appointment be deferred until the Attorney researches and reports back to Council on the election recall or referendum procedures which may affect the appointment. 2. Staff Response to Request for Alternate Staffing for a Centralized Procurement Function. City Manager, Tim Grimmond gave a brief staff report. Council deferred action, and recommended that staff evaluate this item. D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - 1. Vacancies on Planning Commission and Community Cable Advisory Committee. Council directed staff to re -open recruitment for one Planning Commission vacancy, and continued the term of Commissioner Charles O'Hearn until a candidate is appointed. Staff was also directed to open recruitment for one community cable Advisory Committee vacancy, requesting that Mr. Grimmond set a date for interviews prior to August 4, 1998. 2. Report and status of needed improvements at Park Vista Senior Housing and process put in place to accomplish Master Maintenance Plan. City Manager, Tim Grimmond gave a brief staff report. MOVED by Councilmember McDowell, SECONDED by Councilmember Gaines, to approve the Master Maintenance Plan and process to accomplish stated projects. a) management company initiate necessary action to accomplish all identified improvements, b) management company work with, and request the direct assistance from the City Public Works Department, as necessary, to expedite and coordinate building repairs and major maintenance, c) accept loan offer from City Council up to $113,000 to accomplish repairs, if necessary, (term of any loan to be determined if and when a loan is needed), d) request that Council guarantee that funds will be made available to Park Vista for major repairs, in the event funds are not available in Park Vista reserve account. Also, allow the Public Works Department to coordinate the letting of bids, without the need to return for further Council approval MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0. u0'�7! 3. Approve sale of monthly ($32.00) and annual ($365.00) golf green fee passes to El Segundo residents for the Lakes at El Segundo Golf Course. City Manager, Tim Grimmond, gave a brief staff report. MOVED by Councilmember Gaines, SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell, to approve the sale of monthly ($32.00) and annual ($365.00) golf green fee passes to El Segundo residents for the Lakes at El Segundo Golf Course. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510. 4. Progress Report by the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Committee (ASNAC) on Project Early Turns. Liz Garnholtz, Chairwoman, ASNAC, gave a brief oral report. Sandra Mason, resident, referred to an airplane that flew over town, and the progress she has made. Frank Wong, 435 Valley St. addressed Airport noise and early turns. 5. Introduction and application of Charles DeDeurwaerder for ASNAC membership. Council confirmed the appointment of Charles DeDeurwaerder for membership on ASNAC. E. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business. Warrant Numbers 248042 - 248371 on Demand Register Summary Number 27 in total amount of $769,711.19, Warrant Numbers 248372 - 248634 on Demand Register Summary Number 28 in total amount of $519,495.49, and Wire Transfers in the amount of $1,060,904.25. 2. City Council meeting minutes of June 16, 1998. 3. ITEM CALLED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR GORDON FOR PUBLIC QUESTIONS AND CITY ATTORNEY FOR DISCUSSION OF INSURANCE ISSUES. 4. Request for Proposals from architects for the design of Fire Station No. 2 Facility at 2161 East El Segundo Boulevard. Fiscal Impact: $190,000. �� 01 7 5. Adoption of Resolution No. 4071 and Agreement No.2612 providing for three year Memorandum of Understanding between the City Council and the El Segundo Supervisory & Professional Employees Association. Fiscal Impact: $65,352 first year total compensation cost. Funds are available in the City's 1998/99 Fiscal Year Operating Budget for the first 5% salary increase. 6. Adoption of Resolution No. 4072, extending Workers Compensation benefits to Police Reserve Officers and Explorers; uncompensated members of City Commissions, Committees and Boards; and to City Volunteers. Fiscal Impact: Proposal results in no additional funding cost to the City. Future costs will be on an actual basis and in recent years have been zero. 7. PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER WERNICK. 8. South Bay Cities Council of Governments (the "COG ") proposed First Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement No. 2425A and Resolution No 4075. 9. PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER WERNICK 10. PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER WERNICK MOVED by Councilmember Wernick, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, to approve Consent Agenda items 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0. CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA 3. Request the City Council to authorize Contract for the professional services of a Quality Improvement/Assurance Emergency Medical Services Educator, Evelyn A. Riley, M.Ed., R.N., M.I.C.N. Fiscal Impact: Not to exceed $15,000 annually MOVED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, SECONDED by Councilmember Gaines, to approve Contract No. 2611 for the professional services of a Quality Improvement/Assurance Emergency Medical Services Educator, Evelyn A. Riley, M.Ed., R.N., M.I.C.N. Fiscal Impact: Not to exceed $15,000 annually. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0. 7. Adoption of Resolution 1) establishing Executive Management and Mid - Management salary adjustments for Fiscal Year 1998 -99 and a Resolution 2) establishing new salary ranges for designated General Employee, Supervisory and Professional Employee, Mid- Management/Confidential Employee and part-time job classifications. Fiscal impact: $141,157 annualized total compensation cost for the salary increases ranging from 2% to 6 %. Funding for the changes is contained in the 1998 -99 Fiscal Year Operating Budget. UOr17(:, City Attorney Mark Hensley read the following: RESOLUTION NO 4073 A RESOLUTION OF ANGES TO CHAPTER (MANAGEMENT E CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR CH CONFIDENTIAL NTIALSER ES) OF THE EL SEGUNDO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. RESOLUTION NO. 4074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING SALARY RANGES FOR DESIGNATED GENERAL EMPLOYEES, SUPERVISORY AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES AND MID - MANAGEMENT /CONFIDENTIAL JOB CLASSIFICATION. MOVED by Councilmember Gaines, SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell, to approve Resolution No. 4073 and No. 4074 Fiscal impact: $141,157 annualized total compensation cost for the salary increases ranging from 2% to 6 %. Funding for the changes is contained in the 1998- 99 Fiscal Year Operating Budget MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510. Councilmember McDowell did not participate in the portion regarding the Police Chief. 9. Adoption of plans and specifications for sidewalk replacement, handicapped access ramps and new sidewalks on nourished of Grand Avenue, between Illinois Street and Sepulveda Boulevard - Project No. PW 97 -26 (estimated cost - $75,000.00) MOVED by Councilmember Wernick, SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell, to approve plans and specifications for sidewalk replacement, handicapped access ramps and new sidewalks on northside of Grand Avenue, between Illinois Street and Sepulveda Boulevard - Project No. PW 97 -26 (estimated cost - $75,000.00). MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 510. 10. Request for proposals from qualified consultants to perform a space utilization study for El Segundo City Hall. MOVED by Councilmember Wernick, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, to approve request for proposals from qualified consultants to perform a space utilization study for El Segundo City Hall. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0. F. NEW BUSINESS - CITY MANAGER - 1. New Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license for alcohol sales of beer and wine for off -site consumption (Type 20- Off-Sale Beer & Wine) at a new Mobil gas station convenience store at 767 North Sepulveda Boulevard. (ABC 98 -4) Applicant: Mario Sistos - Mobil Oil Corporation. V � 7 Bret Bernard, Director of Planning and Building Safety, gave a brief Staff Report. Adrian Forte, Mobil Oil, supported the application. After Council discussion, no action was taken. G. NEW BUSINESS - CITY ATTORNEY - NONE H. NEW BUSINESS - CITY CLERK - NONE I. NEW BUSINESS - CITY TREASURER — NONE J. NEW BUSINESS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCILMEMBERS Councilmember McDowell - Recommendation to withdraw from Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority. MOVED by Councilmember McDowell, SECONDED by Councilmember Gaines, to direct staff to provide thirty days written notice to Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority of City's intention to withdraw. MOTION PASSED BY UNANANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0. Councilmember Gaines - NONE Councilmember Wernick - Commended P.F. Changs, Restaurant, for their opening ceremony; and advised that Mr. Hensley, Councilmembers Gaines and Wernick are reviewing the City's membership in MAX. Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs - Stated she was elected to SCAG's Regional Transportation Committee. Mayor Gordon - Discussion related to acquisition of parking in the vicinity of Richmond and Holly Streets. MOVED by Councilman McDowell, SECONDED by Councilman Gaines, to direct staff to solicit appraisals of available property on Richmond and Holly Streets. MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOICE VOTE: AYES: MAYOR GORDON, COUNCILMEMBERS WERNICK, GAINES, AND MCDOWELL. NOES: NONE. NOT- PARTICIAPTATING: MAYOR PROTEM JACOBS. 4/0/1. 0 0'07F Mayor Gordon advised he was appointed to SCAG's Aviation Sub - Committee. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. Sandra Mason, spoke regarding the Fourth of July celebration; and stated that the handicap access to Rite -Aid is not sufficient. Councilmember Wernick asked if buses block the exit view of Rite -Aid's parking lot on Grand and Standard. 2. Dorothy Kent, resident, spoke regarding Hyperion issues, and excessive odors. 3. Terry O'Brien, resident, felt Hyperion is non - responsive to complaints. 4. Jim Boulgarides, resident, advised that the parking lot at Mariposa and Center is being used to sell cars. In response, Interim City Manager advised this is a private parking lot and the City has no jurisdiction. Mr. Bougardes addressed the application process for firefighters feeling there were selective advantages in the hiring process. 5. Jane Friedkin, resident, spoke regarding swimnastics, City Committees, ABC licenses and salary issues. 6. Liz Garnholtz, resident, addressed paramedic transfer fee. 7. Sandra Mason, resident, expressed concern regarding the Ralph's market. 8. Frank Wong, resident, felt the Joslyn Center needs an air conditioner. MEMORIALS Mrs. Ruth DeWitt and Glendina Gill. CLOSED SESSION The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code Sec. 54960, et M.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or discussing matters covered under Government Code section 54957 (Personnel); and /or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators; as follows: ADJOURNMENT at 10:30 p.m. to July 9, 1998 at 4:00 P.M. i' G 0 9 7 9 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL Thursday, July 9,1998 - 4:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Gordon at 4:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Kelly McDowell ROLL CALL Mayor Gordon - Present Mayor ProTem Jacobs - Present Councilmember Wernick - Present Councilmember Gaines - Present Councilmember McDowell - Present PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total.) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. No individuals addressed Council CLOSED SESSION: The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code 154950, et se q.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation; and/or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code 154957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as follows: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code 154956.9(a)) - 1. In the Matter of the Application of City of Los Angeles, OAH No. L- 9604014 2. Hill v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 030986 3. Hughes v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. BC 185210 4. Senior v. City of El Segundo, WCAB Unassigned 5. Mosleh & Greffon v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 025903 6. Fenwick v. Civil Service Commission and City of El Segundo, 2 Civil B 121282 and Los Angeles No. BSO44667. 7. City of Los Angeles v. County Sanitation District, City of El Segundo, et al., LASC Case No. BC034185 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code 154956.9(b): -1- potential case (no further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code 154956.9(c): -2- matters. DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code ' 54957) -City Manager recruitment. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code 154957.6) - Meet with negotiator for Supervisory and Professional Employees Association (Local 911 of the Teamsters AFLCIO) and the General Employees Association (El Segundo City Employees Association). CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code 154956.8) - Discussion with real property negotiator, James Hansen, relating to the acquisition of parking in the vicinity of Richmond and ul008el 07- 07- 98.5pm Holly Streets. REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required) PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only Council minute limit) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the Z'ity Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. ADJOURNMENT at 7:45 P.M. to July 21, 1998 at 5:00 P.M. Cindy Mo s n, y Clerk 6008 07- 07- 98.5pm EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 21, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Acceptance of the re- roofing of various City buildings (PW 97 -16). Final contract amount = $71,732.00. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1. Approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $3,590.00. 2. Accept the work as complete. 3. Authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's Office. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: On October 7,1997 the City Council awarded a contract to Coast Roof Company in the amount of $68,142.00 for the re- roofing of Fire Stations 1 and 2, and Hilltop and Acacia Park buildings. DISCUSSION: During re- roofing and after removal of the ebsting roof, it was discovered that the roof structure in several areas of Fire Station 1 and the park buildings had wood damage. Staff authorized the contractor to replace all the damaged wood at an estimated cost of $3,590.00. This work was not included in the original contract and staff is requesting approval of Change Order No. 1 in this amount. This project is funded by the Facilities Maintenance Fund and there are sufficient funds in this program to cover the cost of the requested change order. No additional appropriations are needed for this purpose. All work has now been completed and staff recommends City Council acceptance of the work as complete. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Notice of Completion. FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: Capital Improvement Budget Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: ProjectJAccount Balance: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: Yes No $71.732.00 $93.000.00 Date: FAC 405 (603.604. 711. 714 and 715) Acceptance of the work No y�,s /q8 6 0 NACOUNCILTW- JUL21.02 (Monday 7/13/98 4:00 PM) Recording Requested by and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk, City Hall 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT Project Name : Re- roofing of Various City Buildings Project No.: PW 97 -16 Notice is hereby given pursuant to State of California Civil Code Section 3093 et seq that: The undersigned is an officer of the owner of the interest stated below in the property hereinafter described. 2. The full name of the owner is: City of El Segundo 3. The full address of the owner is: City Hall, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA, 90245 4. The nature of the interest of the owner is: Public buildings. 5. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was field reviewed by the City Engineer on 6/26/98. The work done was: Re- roofing of various City buildings. 6. On 7/21/98, the City Council of the City of El Segundo accepted the work of this contract as being complete and directed the recording of this Notice of Completion in the Office of the County Recorder. The name of the Contractor for such work of improvement was: Coast Roof Company, Inc. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows: Re- roofing of Fire Stations 1 and 2 and Hilltop and Acacia Park buildings. The street address of said property is: N/A Dated: Bellur K. Devaraj City Engineer VERIFICATION I, the undersigned, say: I am the City Engineer of the City El Segundo, the declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on , 1998 at El Segundo, California. Bellur K. Devaraj City Engineer NAW0TICE'S\PW97- 16.N0C (7/7/98) c,c EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 21, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Acceptance of the project to install safety deck surfacing in the City Plunge - Project No. PW 97 -23. (Final contract amount = $21,785.00). RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1. Accept the work as complete. 2. Authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's Office. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: On April 7, 1998, the City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $21,785.00 to Sunset Floors, Inc., for the installation of a safety deck surface on the deck of the City Plunge. DISCUSSION: All work has now been satisfactorily completed. The final contract amount is $21,785.00. Staff is recommending City Council acceptance of the completed work. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Notice of Completion. FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: Capital Improvement Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: No Yes $21,785.00 $31,000.00 $29.000.00 Date: 7/11/98 301 -400- 8202 -8981 Acceptance of work No ("008" NACOUNCIUPW- JUL21.03 (Monday 7/13/98 4:00 PM) Recording Requested by and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk, City Hall 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT Project Name : Plunge Pool Deck Surfacing Project No.: PW 97 -23 Notice is hereby given pursuant to State of California Civil Code Section 3093 et seq that: The undersigned is an officer of the owner of the interest stated below in the property hereinafter described. 2. The full name of the owner is: City of El Segundo 3. The full address of the owner is: City Hall, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA, 90245 4. The nature of the interest of the owner is: Public swimming pool 5. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was field reviewed by the City Engineer on 6/29/97. The work done was: Install safety deck surface 6. On 7/21/98, the City Council of the City of El Segundo accepted the work of this contract as being complete and directed the recording of this Notice of Completion in the Office of the County Recorder. 7. The name of the Contractor for such work of improvement was: Sunset Floors, Inc. 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows: Indoor public swimming pool 9. The street address of said property is: 219 West Mariposa Avenue Dated: Bellur K. Devaraj City Engineer VERIFICATION I, the undersigned, say: I am the City Engineer of the City El Segundo, the declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on 1998 at El Segundo, California. Bellur K. Devaraj City Engineer NANOTICE'STW97 -21NOC (7/8/98) 0 0 08 5 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA DESCRIPTION: MEETING DATE: July 21, 1998 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda Award contract to John T. Malloy, Inc., for the 1997 -98 replacement of water mains - Project No. PW 97 -15 (contract amount $267,072.90). RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1. Award contract to the lowest responsible bidder John T. Malloy, Inc., in the amount of $267,072.90. 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the standard public works construction agreement after approval as to form by the City Attorney. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The City Council on June 2,1998, adopted plans and specifications for the replacement of water mains in the following streets in the City and authorized staff to advertize the project for receipt of construction bids: 1. Nash Street, between Imperial Highway and Maple Avenue. 2. Main Street, between Oak Avenue to 200' south of Palm Avenue. 3. Palm Avenue, between Sheldon Street and Penn Street. DISCUSSION: On July 7, 1998, the City Clerk received and opened the following bids: John T. Malloy, Inc. $267,072.90 Tomovich and Associates $312,288.00 Gueno Development $375,738.00 Engineer's Estimate $270,000.00 Staff has verified the low bidder's references and has received favorable responses regarding recently completed water main replacement projects. Staff recommends award of contract to the lowest responsible bidder, John T. Malloy, Inc., in the amount of $267,072.90. The total estimated cost of the project, including staff inspection costs and construction contingencies, is $275,000.00. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Location map. FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: Capital Improvement Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: No Yes $275,000.00 $600,000-00 $585.000.00 Date: 5/20/98 501 -400- 7103 -8207 Award of contract No 7115-118 tl 0 f} �q NACOUNCILTW- JUL21.04 (Monaay t11J1v0 3:uu rm) r {n ti i I AANA03 2313ONV $01 'A.Nd 3N?AONlINVN /0 Ally ° • 00710 NWf Z • i naaa ' • •_ • • M INiI M N N 7At w {I I II II � � II II III �__ • J O Yf — M011•IA• 'OAIf / l t A 0 WM 1!� N• e• — OC sr Z �•� 7A•OON007Y J > < > J i rAIY /1'AM } � 1< S • 'OY A71110, r1N7N11NO] Z • 1{ Q110/r iNll riiYO i OYli77 a law Wu • A•• 7Yr/ _ is N {•N Y < In lr 0 ArM L m W � AYM $34" M Oilllr � < < CW1 is Afl7f f lY0/1fr 'OMr G >' = W M = p i s MCI Sil — _ J A • W h r07A1A1 )s � g N is •Nr10N1 AM Sil MI '7M Yt0 1M w17 G p C',M 7N1/ QO� 'ls NOINIINS•• C 7M UINI•• } . i 1 if stiN•N 1 •11170 M10/ OOO is •INYOMIr] g '7Ar wlr/ 1] • Y011 O f O is NOf7 M Y0 •0•A7N ° '7Ar 71/•w � '7 ]g IJt/ O1f Y C-sA• 17YNr1 Yl i 110 •01•{Nllf i W C� a �® if ONt11Yrw ~ 'ON Y A7NY1101/ W 1{ tllw0l < = 111 M ®® if •YY7 1f IN 7N]N•1{ Y• IS NN7/ J I J ® is N0017NS ED • • ®— �s rN7Y• pl • ~ N IL — f • A ew d E3=3 is Nlrw r • t r • M` fM0 if ONOwN]IY " + .p-i O•• fM�0 is w . I �❑�� rlNl{YIA oaa® if {N111M• if t1f1A rw01 ,1 O 1 Y Q . 1 � Z = i A711.1 i Is • y 1•il • • • ( O 1{ 1s7Y]11M \ 1 1 Y = I vi — TA�•NNIq All9 lees 6S 1 i W N = �Og p b d 0$ O_ Of Q LL. O Q u W H 00 IL CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INTER - DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE July 13, 1998 TO Tim Grimmond Acting City Manager FROM Bellur Devaraj �aG Acting Director of Public Works SUBJECT Potential Conflict of Interest Items - City Council Meeting of July 21, 1998 Is the project within 300 feet of a business or property owned by a City Council member? BKD:dr cc: Ed Schroder, Director of Public Works NAMEMOSZONFLICTA2 Ye t ;_,098(," Mayor Mayor Council Council Council Agenda Item Mike Pro Tern Member Member Member Gordon Sandra Nancy John Kelly Jacobs Wernick Gaines McDowell Award of contract for the 1997 -98 replacement of water No No No No No lines - Project No. 97 -15 BKD:dr cc: Ed Schroder, Director of Public Works NAMEMOSZONFLICTA2 Ye t ;_,098(," EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 21, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Request for approval to submit an application for a Bureau of Justice Assistance Local Law Enforcement Block Grant requesting $18,640 in grant funding with a $1,864 cash match from Asset Forfeiture funds. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve request. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: On June 29, 1998, the Police Department received an application outlining eligibility and program requirements for obtaining grant funding from the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The deadline to submit the application is July 31, 1998. The Police Department is proposing to submit a grant application to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Assistance requesting $18,640 for the acquisition of geo- mapping and crime analysis custom software programs. The grant funding program requires a minimum 10% match ($1,864) to be made by the City with Asset Forfeiture funds, Professional and Technical Services account. In addition to the 10% match, a public hearing identified as an agenda item and held during a regularly scheduled city council meeting, is required. Also, an advisory board consisting of representatives from units of local government (e.g., law enforcement, court system, public school system, etc.) will be established and convene once to review the arant application and to offer non - binding recommendations. DISCUSSION: The geo- mapping and crime analysis programs will improve and expand the Department's ability to determine the most effective and efficient deployment for police services; provide statistical information for business and economic development; and provide information to the public via future automated systems, e.g., city web -site. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Memo to Acting City Manager Tim Grimmond from Acting Chief of Police Jack Wayt FISCAL IMPACT: ORI A9 D: Jack Wayt, Actin REVIEWED BY: (Check one) Operating Budget: X Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: $1,864.00 Project/Account Budget: $ Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number: 109 -400- 3105 -6214 Project Phase: Appropriation Required - Yes X No of Police Date: Date: � /i3 /tea raW21LVJJ s0 �a-�►n PD -I -1 of 2, 7/14/98 10:00 am qty gop_*el C_�� INTER - DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE July 10, 1998 To: Tim Grimmond, Acting City Manager From: Jack Wayt, Acting Chief of Police Subject: Request to submit application for Jnt funding with matching funds requirement On June 29, 1998, the El Segundo Police Department received an application kit for a Bureau of Justice Assistance Local Law Enforcement Block Grant program. The deadline to submit the application is July 31, 1998. The department is very interested in seeking this funding in order to acquire a geo- mapping and crime analysis program that will improve and expand our ability to determine the most effective and efficient deployment of police services. It will readily produce statistical data for business and economic development purposes in addition to providing the general public with information via the City's planned website. The maximum amount of funding the department is eligible for is $18,640. A minimum 10% match ($1,864) is required under the federally funded program. The maximum amount of funding available through the BJA Block Grant program, and the 10% match, will be sufficient to purchase the custom software programs much needed by police personnel. I recommend that we seek approval from the City Council, apply for the BJA Grant and propose to use Asset Forfeiture funds to fulfill the 10% match requirement. 907, O PD -I -2 of 2, 7/10/98 4:00 pm G0 D�� EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT MEETING DATE: July 21, 1998 AGENDA HEADING: Consent AGENDA DESCRIPTION: The destruction of identified records in accordance with the provisions of Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California. The City Attorney has consented to the plan for records destruction. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Resolution authorizing the destruction of certain records INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Each year various Departments need to transition older documents to storage or destruction and make space for the new year's records. By reviewing the older records, and inventorying the current ones, we are able to use the available storage area more efficiently. To accomplish this goal these older records, which are not longer needed, should be destroyed. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution with attachments. FISCAL IMPACT: ORIG (Check one) Operating Budget: X Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number: 001 -400- 1301 -5204 Project Phase: Appropriation Required - Yes No X 7 Timothy Grimmond City Manager ACTION TAKEN: Date: Date: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN RECORDS WHEREAS, there is presented to the City Council for approval and forwarding to the City Council, the attached correspondence; and WHEREAS, the City Council fords that the records hereinreferred to are of no further value to the City of El Segundo, and that they occupy badly needed storage space; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney has, in accordance with the provisions of Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California, consented to the destruction of said records and documents. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and granted authority to dispose of the records identified in Exhibit "A ", and shall cause these records to be destroyed in a lawful manner. SECTION 2. Upon destruction of the foregoing records, the City Clerk shall make a certificate of complete destruction of said records and file the original of the same in the Office of the City Clerk and file a copy of said certificate together with a certified copy of this resolution in the City Clerk's Department. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said city; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said city, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 2155 day of July, 1998. Mike Gordon, Mayor ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 2151 day fo July, 1998, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D. Hens y, City Attorney t)C'�92 E1 Segundo Fire Department 1969 -1990 Fire Reports 1969 -1990 Rescue Reports 1969 -1990 Correspondence Records 1969 -1986 Finance, Budget and Purchase Orders 1969 -1994 Department Personnel Folders 1969 Paramedic Billing Library 1994 -1995 Library 1994 -1995 Library 1994 -1995 Library 1994 -1995 Library 1994 -1995 Library 1994 -1995 Library 1995 -1995 Library 1994 -1995 Library 1995 -1995 Library Human Resources Fine Transmittal Forms Request for Reimbursement of Expenses Copy Machine Receipts Lost Book (partial paid) Receipts Lost Book (paid) Receipts Cash Register Tapes Invoices Postage Receipts Purchase Orders 1992 & Prior Recruitment Files 1992 & Prior General Correspondence Files Approved for Destruction: MARK HENSLEY, EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. ATTORNEY July 6, 1998 CITY MANAGER FILES FOR DESTRUCTION City Manager (Sorsabal) Correspondence - 1986 -88 it it (Jacobson) - 1986 -88 to if Minutes - 1988 City Council (Bob Anderson) Correspondence - 1986 -90 If if Resolutions from other cities - 1978 -88 it of Orientation - 1986 -88 it if Agendas - 1988 City Attorney Correspondence - 1987 -88 CATV - Miscellaneous correspondence 1982 -88 Complaints, general - 1988 Chevron Hydrocarbon Investigation Chevron Correspondence, miscellaneous - 1988 South Bay City Managers monthly minutes - 1977 -88 BOX I City Manager (Jones) Correspondence chron files - 3/80 through 8/80 V1 it Agendas - 1977 -80 Miscellaneous correspondence, general - 1987 Miscellaneous drawings, precise plans, zoning regulations - 1969 -1988 Planning Commission: Agendas /Minutes /Applications/Members - 1976 -1988 Planning Department: Correspondence - Zone changes, seismic safety, mist. reports, land use, housing., community development block grant, building moratorium - 1974 -1988 Police Department: Accident reports, correspondence on various grants, Explorer Post - 1969 -1988 Public Works - Correspondence - 1979 -1988 Senior Housing - Correspondence, Miscellaneous - 1984 -88 APPROVED FOR DESTRUCTION: ! +� F EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. MARK D. HENSLEY, tktY ATTORNEY City Manager Files for Destruction Page 2 7 -6 -98 BOX 3 Annual Financial Reports - 1983 -1986 Capital Improvement Program - 1983 -1990 Consulting Services - 1986 Development program for City of Hawthorne, Mattel project, EIP - 1988 -1990 Plan Check program - 1984 BOX 5 Contract Documents - communication and electrical equipment 1976 Budget (year unknown) Correspondence, Interdepartmental - 1988 Del Aire annexation - 1987 ICRMA Liability insurance Public Works contracts - curbs /sidewalks /water lines; traffic study, variance requests - 1980 -1988 Legislation - Newsletters, correspondence - 1986 -1988 Legislative Advocates, Kenneth J. Emanuels & Assoc. - 1987 -1988 Legislative lobbying (Emadnuels) - 1987 -1988 "City of El Segundo 70th Annniversary flyer - 1987 L.A. County Sanitation District - Corrrespondence, minutes, 5/83 - 10/88 L.A. County Flood Control Dist. - Correspondence, 1/81 - 1/85 Intercity Transportation Committee - Correspondence , 1981 -1987 Churches, charities & Service Organizations - 1986 -1988 State of California, Dept. of Industrial Relations - 1978 -1982 Bay Cities Transportation Authority - 1983 Office Equipment - Typewriters, multilith, printing, etc., corres. 1970 -1988 Purchase orders - City Manager /City Council - 1985 -1988 Purchasing - Radio Equipment - 1973 -1984 Purchassing - Library, 1968- 111985; Planning Dept. - 1982 Maintenance Service - Joslyn Center - 1966 -1987 EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED FOR DESTRUCTION: 0 0F.9- -1 City Manager Files for Destruction Page 3 7 -6 -98 BOX 7 Audits - 1986 - 1987 Auctions: Surplus City Property - 1966 - 1986 Alcohol Beverage Control - 1988 Aerospace - 1985 Air Quality - 1988 Automation - Data Processing - 1983 -1988 Beaches - 1988 Bicycles /paths & Safety - 1981 Program Budget - Harvey M. Rose - 1985 Building Dept., Noise Enforcement - 1973 -1985 it it Earthquake, correspondence, pamphlets - 1973 -1987 it It Heliports/helistops - 1973 -1986 Building Mainenance - 1973 -1987 Building Moratorium - 1982 -1987 Permit Processing /Plan Check - 1988 Business Licenses - 1987 -1988 California State Mandated Costs - 1975 -1984 it " Surplus Funds - 1978 -1988 Chamber of Commerce - 1983 -1988 Public Opinion Survey - 1988 Departmentalized Draft Material /layout correspondence - 1977 Royal Omniwriter Operating Training Manual Municipal Code Enforcement by Fire Dept. - 7/13/88 Reso: Defining and Establishing Certain Streeets Royal Business Machindes Manual - 1982 Maintenance Agreement for Word Processing Maintenance Dept. Receipts - 1980 -1988 Animal Control Report - 1989 So. Cal. Association of Govts. - 1988 Northrop Corp., Misc. correspondence - 1981 Word Processing Manuals APPROVED FOR DESTRUCTION: EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. ZI . HENSLEY, CITY ATTAkNEY 00;;96 City Manager Files for destruction Page 4 7 -6 -98 Rosecrans Blvd., correspondence - 1984 -1988 Rockwell International, newsclippings - 1986 Revenue Sharing - 1979 - 1987 California League of Cities, bulletins - 1988 CCAN Innovation Group, bulletin on water retaining polymers Residency Requirements - 1987 -1988 Bicentennial Constitution - 1988 Consultants resumes - 1986 - 1987 Police Department MOU - Salaries, 1986 Fire Department - Salaries, 1986 Miscellaneous employees - Salary revisions, 1985 -1986 City Hall Lounge, concession costs - 1985 YMCA, miscellaneous correspondence - 1983 -1987 West Basin Water Association , General correspondence - 1986 Unitedd Way, correspondence - 1988 Mosquito Abatement District - 1988 So. Cal. Public Labor Relations Council newsletters - 1981 -1984 WE TIP - 1982 - 1987 So. Bav Free Clinic - 1980 -1988 So. Bay Cities Association - 1985 -1988 So. Bay Children's Health Center, correspondence - 1967 -1980 Salvation Army, correspondence - 1979 Red Cross, correspondence - 1980 -1986 Optimist Club of El Segundo, minutes - 1971 -1981 Municipal Fine Arts Committee - 1975 -1982 APPROVED FOR DESTRUCTION: MARK--D. HENSZEY , TITY ATTOR EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. 1. i 0 ; . ) 9 "1 City Manager Files for Destruction Page 5 7 -6 -98 BOX 10 Yellow Cab Co., correspondence - 1982 Tax - Transient Occupancy - 1983 -1988 Taxes - Property Tax Inequity - 1985 -1988 Property Tax Inequity Committee - 1984 -1988 Taxes - Property Tax for PERS - 1983 -1986 Tax Rates - Assessed Valuations - 1979 -1987 Taxes - No and Low Property Taxes - 1978 -1988 Taxes - Sales Stated Baord of Equalization - 1985 -1988 Room Tax - 1983 -1988 Southern California Gas Co. Southern California Edison Co. - 1985 -1988 SPCA - Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - 1986 -1988 Signs, Street Banners - Use of - 1965 -1988 Sepulveda Properties - 1979 -1988 E.S. School District Child Care Facility - 1965 -1988 E.S. High School Acccreditation - 1981 -1986 School /City Video Project - 1982 -1987 School - Imperial School - Application for CUP - 1986 Student Government Day - 1985 -1987 E.S. Educational Foundation - Community Appreciation Day = 1987 -1988 BOX 11 Automotive Equipment 1981 If Repair Quotations - 1966 -1981 Wyle Laboratories, correspondence - 1969 -1987 Weed Abatement - 1979 -1988 Shelter Media, billing - 1987 Water rates - 1985 -1988 Water conservation/reclamation - 1979 -1988 So. Calif. Water Committee - 1986 Water Enterprise Fund Accounting - 1988 Santa Bay Restoration - 1988 Water Quality Control, Contract w /DWP re street improvements - 1985 -1988 Water Department, correspondence - 1980 -1988 TRW Lease, property at Douglas for parking usage - 1985 -1986 TRW .11 if it it it if it - 1965 -1988 Transportation, Metro Rail - 1986 it Light Rail, E.S. extension - 1987 Trailer permits - 1978 -87 EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED FOR DESTRUCTION: arms I om NO 00. -'9p City Manager Files for Destruction Page 6 7 -6 -98 BOX 11 (continued) Towing and Salvage - 1970 -1987 Taxicab permit - AM /PM Taxi Co. - 1986 -1988 it if - L.A. City Cab Co. - 1977 -1986 " to - Metrochecker Cab Co. - 1988 it - Futura Transporation/Westside Cab - 1988 it - El Segundo Cab Co. - 1982 it - United Cab Co. - 1982 - Independent Taxi Owners Assoc. ti - Wilmington Cab Co. - 1983 of - Intn'l. Taxi Transport Assoc. - 1983 BOX 12 Hacienda Hotel correspondence re structural defects (corrected) 1989 City Council correspondence /newsletter - 1988 UPS Center, environmental imact report - 1988 Imperial Elementary School lease (copy) - 1980 City of El Segundo, Chevron Corporation Grant Deed (Draft) BOX 14 City Counsel correspondence - 1988 UPS Parcel Center, Environmental Impact Report - 1988 Lease - Imperial Elementary School District (copy) - 1988 Chevron Corporation Grant Deed (draft) APPROVED FOR DESTRUCTION: . HENSLEY, CITY ATTORNEY EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. n -9 j