The URL can be used to link to this page

1998 JUL 07 CC PACKETAGENDA ... .... - EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items. The Public can participate in the discussion of any item listed on the Agenda. To facilitate your presentation, please place a check mark ✓ beside each item you would like to address on the Agenda provided by the City Clerk, preferably PRIOR to the start of the meeting. Any other item not listed on the Agenda that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council may be directly addressed during Public Communications. Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and give: Your name and address and the organization you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits. Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2:00 p.m. the prior Tuesday). The request must include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 607 -2208. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 7, 1998 - 5:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Kelly McDowell ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total.) Individuals who have received value of850 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of 8250. SPECIAL MATTER: Appointment of real property negotiator relating to the acquisition of parking in the vicinity of Richmond and Holly Streets. Recommendation - Appoint James Hansen as real property negotiator. CLOSED SESSION: The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, et seq.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation; and/or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as follows: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a)) - 1. In the Matter of the Application of City of Los Angeles, OAH No. L- 9604014 2. Hill v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 030986 0'1 , !. 07 -07 -99 5pm 3. Hughes v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. BC 185210 4. Senior v. City of El Segundo, WCAB Unassigned 5. Mosleh & Greffon v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 025903 6. Fenwick v. Civil Service Commission and City of El Segundo, 2 Civil B121282 and Los Angeles No. BSO44667. 7. City of Los Angeles v. County Sanitation District, City of El Segundo, et al., LASC Case No. BC034185 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(b): -1- potential case (no further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c): -2- matters. DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) - City Manager recruitment. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957.6) - Meet with negotiator for Supervisory and Professional Employees Association (Local 911 of the Teamsters AFLCIO) and the General Employees Association (El Segundo City Employees Association). CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) - Discussion with real property negotiator, James Hansen, relating to the acquisition of parking in the vicinity of Richmond and Holly Streets. REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required) SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS - Interview applicants for City Treasurer position. Recommendation - Interview and announce appointment. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: DATE a TIME �,,y -oS-a . in NAME7j , jag, 6,n 07 -07 -98 5pm 2 AGENDA EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items. The Public can participate in the discussion of any item listed on the Agenda. To facilitate your presentation, please place a check mark ✓ beside each item you would like to address on the Agenda provided by the City Clerk, preferably PRIOR to the start of the meeting. Any other item not listed on the Agenda that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council may be directly addressed during Public Communications. Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and give: Your name and address and the organization you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits. Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2:00 p.m. the prior Tuesday). The request must include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 607 -2208. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 7, 1998 - 7:00 P.M. Next Resolution # 4070 Next Ordinance # 1288 CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION - Father Joseph Azadian, S.J., Saint Anthony Roman Catholic Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Kelly McDowell PRESENTATIONS ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify, themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only. Recommendation - Approval. P0((!)? B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS - 1. Continued Public Hearing on Environmental Assessment EA -411 and Development Agreement Extension DA 97 -2 for a five (5) year extension of a Development Agreement for a 182 room hotel and six story, 290,000 square foot office building at 2301 -2381 Rosecrans and 810 -820 South Douglas Street. Applicant: Continental Development Corporation, Mr. Jerry Saunders. Recommendation - 1) Open continued public hearing; 2) Council discussion; 3) Reading of Resolution by title only; and, 4) By motion, adopt Resolution approving the extended Development Agreement. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - Council appointment to fill City Treasurer vacancy. Recommendation - Discussion and possible action. 2. Staff Response to Request for Alternate Staffing for a Centralized Procurement Function Recommendation - City Council direct the Human Resources Department to identify a class specification that will provide the position needed in the Finance Department, Business Services Division, to support the centralization of the City's purchasing function. This position will support purchasing and the management of the City's contracts. This management will include insurance compliance monitoring, business license compliance and the review of contracts to maintain same in a current position. This action will result in a modification of the City Clerk's 1998 -99 budget by moving the funds for the Office Specialist II position to the Business Services Division. D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - 1. Vacancies on Planning�Commission and Community Cable Advisory Committee. Recommendation - 1) Re -open recruitment for one vacancy on Planning Commission; 2) Continue the term of Commissioner Charles O'Hearn until candidate is appointed; 3) Open recruitment for one vacancy on Community Cable Advisory Committee; 4) Advertise the positions pursuant to established procedure, with filing deadline to be set for 5:00 p.m., two days (48 hours) prior to Interviews of candidates. 5) Schedule date of Interviews. 2. Report and status of needed improvements at Park Vista Senior Housing and process put in place to accomplish Master Maintenance Plan. Recommendation - Approve Master Maintenance Plan and process to accomplish stated projects. 0 0 A Approve sale of monthly ($32.00) and annual ($365.00) golf green fee passes to El Segundo residents for the Lakes at El Segundo Golf Course. Recommendation - Approve sale of monthly and annual golf passes. 4. Progress Report by the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Committee (ASNAC) on Project Early Turns. Recommendation - Receive report. Introduction and application of Charles DeDeurwaerder for ASNAC membership. Recommendation - Council confirmation of Charles DeDeurwaerder for membership to ASNAC. E. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business. Warrant Numbers 248042 - 248371 on Demand Register Summary Number 27 in total amount of $769,711.19, Warrant Numbers 248372 - 248634 on Demand Register Summary Number 28 in total amount of $519.495.49, and Wire Transfers in the amount of $1.060.904.25. Recommendation - Approve Warrant Demand Registers and authorize staff to release. Ratify: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or agreements; emergency disbursements and /or adjustments; and wire transfers from 06/10/98 to 06/30/98. 2. City Council meeting minutes of June 16, 1998. Recommendation - Approval. Request the City Council to authorize contracting the professional services of a Quality Improvement /Assurance Emergency Medical Services Educator. Fiscal Impact: Not to exceed $15.000 annually. Recommendation - Approve a sole source one year contract (renewable annually) for the professional services of Evelyn A. Riley, M.Ed., R.N., M.I.C.N. 4. Request for Proposals from architects for the design of Fire Station No. 2 Facility at 2161 East E1 Segundo Boulevard. Fiscal Impact: $190.000. Recommendation - Authorize staff to solicit proposals from qualified architects to provide architectural and design services for construction of Fire Station No. 2. UD 5 0J 5. Agreement providing for three year Memorandum of Understanding between the City Council and the El Segundo Supervisory & Professional Employees Association. Fiscal Impact: $65,352 first year total compensation cost. Funds are available in the City's 1998/99 Fiscal Year Operating Budget for the first 5% salary increase. Recommendation - 1) Approve the Agreement. 2) Adopt Resolution. 6. Proposed Resolution extending Workers Compensation benefits to Police Reserve Officers and Explorers; uncompensated members of City Commissions, Committees and Boards; and to City Volunteers. Fiscal Impact: Proposal results in no additional funding cost to the City. Future costs will be on an actual basis and in recent years have been zero. Recommendation - Adopt Resolution. Proposed Resolutions 1) establishing Executive Management and Mid - Management salary adjustments for Fiscal Year 1998 -99 and 2) establishing new salary ranges for designated General Employee, Supervisory and Professional Employee, Mid - Management /Confidential Employee and part-time job classifications. Fiscal impact: $141,157 annualized total compensation cost for the salary increases ranging from 2% to 6 %. Funding for the changes is contained in the 1998 -99 Fiscal Year Operatine Budget. Recommendation - Adopt Resolutions. 8. South Bay Cities Council of Governments (the "COG ") proposed First Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement. Recommendation - 1) Approve Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign. 2) Adopt Resolution. 9. Adoption of plans and specifications for sidewalk replacement, handicapped access ramps and new sidewalks on northside of Grand Avenue, between Illinois Street and Sepulveda Boulevard - Proiect No. PW 97 -26 (estimated_ cost - 575-000.00 Recommendation - Adopt plans and specifications and authorize staff to advertise the project for construction bids. 10. Request for proposals from qualified consultants to perform a space utilization study for the E1 Segundo City Hall. Recommendation - Authorize staff to solicit proposals from qualified consultants. CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA 0 0 ,)06 F. NEW BUSINESS - CITY MANAGER - 1. New Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license for alcohol sales of beer and wine for off -site consumption (Type 20- Off -Sale Beer & Wine) at a new Mobil gas station convenience store at 767 North Sepulveda Boulevard. (ABC 98 -4) Applicant: Mario Sistos - Mobil Oil Corporation. Recommendation - Determine whether or not the public convenience or necessity would be served by the issuance of the ABC license, and provide input to the Director of Planning and Building Safety on the pending Administrative Use Permit (AUP 98 -5/EA- 441) for alcohol sales at the new Mobil gas station convenience store. G. NEW BUSINESS - CITY ATTORNEY - NONE H. NEW BUSINESS - CITY CLERK - NONE I. NEW BUSINESS - CITY TREASURER - NONE J. NEW BUSINESS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCILMEMBERS Councilmember McDowell - Recommendation to withdraw from Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority_ Recommendation - Council direct staff to provide 30 days written notice to the Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority of intention to withdraw. Councilmember Gaines - NONE - Councilmember Wernick - NONE Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs - NONE - Mayor Gordon - Discussion related to acquisition of parking in the vicinity of Richmond and Holly Streets. Recommendation - Direct staff to proceed with appraisal and negotiation. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so iden0 y themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. MEMORIALS CLOSED SESSION The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code Sec. 54960, et seq.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or discussing matters covered under Government Code section 54957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators; as follows: Continuation of matters listed on the City Council Agenda for 5:00 p.m., July 7, 1998 under "Closed Session" (if needed). REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required) ADJOURNMENT in Memory of Mrs. Ruth DeWitt POSTED: DATE: a, TIME: L0 0 NAME:`? 07 -07 98.ag CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INTER - DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE June 29, 1998 TO Jim Morrison City Manager FROM Bellur Devaraj .�(1 City Engineer f�lt7 SUBJECT Potential Conflict of Interest Items - City Council Meeting of July 7, 1998 Is the project within 300 feet of a business or property owned by a City Council member? Consent Agenda Item Mayor Mike Gordon Mayor Pro Tern Sandra Jacobs Council Member Nancy Wernick Council Member John Gaines Council Member Kelly McDowell Adoption of plans and specifications for the sidewalk replacement, handicapped access ramps and new sidewalks on Grand Avenue: 1. Sidewalk replacement (City-wide) at various locations. Yes Yes Yes No Yes 2. Handicapped access ramps at various locations. No No No No No 3. Grand Avenue sidewalk northside between Illinois No No No No No Street and Sepulveda Boulevard. a aarar rrwararrraraa+ aaaraaaarraaaaaaaa +arwwwwaraarwaaaaraarrrwara BKD:dr cc: Ed Schroder, Director of Public Works NAMEMOMONFLICT.JUL EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 7, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Special Order of Business - Public Hearing AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Continued Public Hearing on Environmental Assessment EA -411 and Development Agreement Extension DA 97 -2 for a•five (5) year extension of a Development Agreement for a 182 room hotel and six story, 290,000 square foot office building at 2301 -2381 Rosecrans and 810 -820 South Douglas Street. Applicant: Continental Development Corporation, Mr. Jerry Saunders. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1) Open Continued public hearing; 2) Council discussion; 3) Reading of Resolution by title only; and, 4) By motion, Adopt Resolution approving the extended Development Agreement. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The Planning Division received the initial request for above referenced applications on April 10, 1997, and the formal applications were submitted on March 12, 1998. The applications request City Council approval of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for Environmental Assessment (EA -411) and adopting an extension to a Development Agreement (Instrument No. 92- 1056312) for a five year extension of the Development Agreement. On June 16, 1998, the City Council opened the public hearing and Continued the hearing until tonight without discussion. DISCUSSION: On May 28, 1996, the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing, reviewed the facts and findings related to Environmental Assessment EA- 411 and Development Agreement Extension 97 -2, and adopted Resolution No. 2419. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2419 recommends that the City Council Approve EA -411 and DA 97 -2. A more complete project description, analysis, and background information, is included in the accompanying Planning Commission Staff Report and its attachments, which were previously distributed to the City Council on May 22 and June 16, 1998; and, are again included as an attachment to this Report. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. (adopted) Planning Commission Resolution No. 2419. 2. (draft) Planning Commission Minutes; May 28, 1998. 3. Planning Commission Staff Report and Attachments; May 28, 1998. 4. (draft) City Council Resolution No. FISCAL IMPACT: None ORIGINATED: Date: 25 June 1998 / I Bret B. Bernard, AICP, Director of Planning and Building Safety REVIEWED BY: Date: J Clm�s W. MorrisonW. Morrison, City t/ ACTION TAKEN: p: \projects \401 - 425 \ea411 \ea411 -2.ais 0 0'' I RESOLUTION NO. 2419 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A FIVE (5) YEAR EXTENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 97 -2 FOR PROPERTY AT 2301 -2381 ROSECRANS AND 810 -820 SOUTH DOUGLAS STREET AND CERTIFICATION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA- 411. PETITIONED BY CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. WHEREAS, an application has been received from Continental Development Corporation, requesting approval of an Environmental Assessment and a five (5) year extension to a Development Agreement to allow the continued development rights for Phase 11 of a hotel and office development on 9.69 acres located at 2301 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue and 810 -820 South Douglas Street in the Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone; and, WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment (EA -411), including a Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for the proposed use, has been prepared and circulated to all interested parties and Staff, for review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and supporting evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act, State CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No. 3805); and , WHEREAS, on May 28, 1998, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law; and, WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against the findings of Environmental Assessment EA-411 and Development Agreement Extension 97 -2; and, WHEREAS, at said hearing the following facts were established: The project site consists of 9.69 acres. The project consists of a hotel with a maximum of 182 rooms (Phase I) and a 290,000 square foot office building and parking structure (Phase 1I), each with a maximum floor area ratio of 1.0. A 122 -room Summerfield Suites Hotel was constructed to satisfy the hotel portion of the project. The subject proposal complies with all applicable requirements of the underlying Heavy Industrial (M -2) Zone, which was the zoning in effect at the time of approval of the original Development Agreement. 4. The subject proposal is to complete a previously approved project, specifically Phase II, covered by the following previous approvals and agreements: Environmental Assessment EA -206, Subdivision 89 -10 for a Lot Line Adjustment to Parcel Map No. 17158, and a Development Agreement were approved by City Council Resolution No. 3660 on November 6, 1990, certifying an Addendum to an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park Phase V and adopting mitigation measures for a project consisting of maximum 182 - room hotel and a 290,000 square foot office tower and related parking structure at the northeast comer of Rosecrans Avenue and Douglas Street (2301 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue and 810 -20 South Douglas Street). i'71 1 Precise Plan 89 -2 was also approved on November 6, 1990 by City Council Ordinance No. 1157 to allow the proposed uses in the Heavy Industrial (M -2) Zone. A Development Agreement (Instrument No. 92- 1056312) was executed on June 10, 1992 pursuant to which the City granted the Developer the right to construct the project in accordance with the rules, regulations, zoning, and official policies existing at the time. Section 8.1 of the Development Agreement allows the applicant to apply for a five (5) year extension subject to a discretionary review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. 5. The current Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) zoning for the site is consistent with the current General Plan Land Use designation of the site for Urban Mixed -Use South. The subject proposal is consistent with the intent of the MU -S zoning designation by allowing for hotel and office uses. 6. The surrounding areas to the west, north and east are developed with office uses, a health club, research and development, restaurants, and hotels. To the south across Rosecrans Avenue are retail uses. The properties to the north, west, and east are zoned Mixed -Use South (MU -S), and to the south is Planned Development (City of Manhattan Beach). The project site is located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo, approximately one quarter -mile west of the San Diego (I -405) Freeway and two miles south of the Glenn Anderson (I -105) Freeway. The Metro Green Line and a station at Douglas Street are located adjacent to, and north of, the project site. Local jurisdictions near the site include the City of Los Angeles located north of Imperial Highway, the City of Manhattan Beach located south of Rosecrans Avenue, and the City of Hawthorne located east of Aviation Boulevard. The proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with State guidelines and local requirements, a Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration was prepared and circulated for public and interdepartmental review. No significant adverse impacts were identified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after considering the above facts and study of proposed Environmental Assessment EA-411 and Development Agreement Extension 97 -2, the Planning Commission makes the following findings and recommends the City Council approve a five (5) year extension to the original Development Agreement and certify the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts: The Draft Initial Study was made available for public review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law. The Initial Study concluded that the proposed project will not have a significant, adverse effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact will be prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and 2. That when considering the whole record, there is no evidence that the project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends, because the project is in a built - out urban environment; and That the Planning Commission thereby recommends that the City Council authorize and direct the Director of Planning and Building Safety to file with the appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and de minimis finding pursuant to AB 3158 and the California Code of Regulations. Within ten (10) days of the approval of the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts, the applicant shall submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of $25.00 required by the County of Los Angeles for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of Determination. As approved in AB 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA will not be 2 met and no vesting shall occur until this condition is met and the required notices and fees are filed with the County. 1. The applicant is requesting approval of a five (5) year extension to a Development Agreement, pursuant to the provisions of state law, City Council Resolution No. 3268, and Section 8.1 of the Development Agreement. 2. The extended Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan. 3. The extended Development Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district in which the real property is located. 4. The extended Development Agreement is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice. 5. The extended Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare. 6. The extended Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values. That the proposed use is consistent with the following General Plan Land Use policy and objective: LU 4 -3.4 and LU 4-4. This policy and objective encourages mixed -use developments near green line stations and provides for mixed developments to provide synergistic relationships which can maximize economic benefits, reduce traffic impacts and encourage pedestrian environments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Environmental Assessment EA-411 and Development Agreement Extension 97 -2, subject to the following conditions: Prior to execution and recording, the applicant shall amend Section No. 1 of the Consent to Extension of Development Agreement to indicate that the five year extension shall commence on June 9, 1997, not the date of recording of the document. 2. Within 60 days of approval by the City Council, the Consent to Extension of Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded. If the Consent to Extension of Development Agreement is not recorded within this time period, approval of the extension shall be null and void. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of the previously recorded Development Agreement (recorded on June 10, 1992), Prior to issuance of a building permit for Phase 11, the applicant shall develop plans which indicate that the project is in substantial conformance with plans approved and on file with the Department of Planning and Building Safety and further outlined in the "project description" and provisions contained in the original Development Agreement. Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred to the Director of Planning and Building Safety for a determination regarding the need for Planning Commission review of the proposed modification. 3 O0 ► t 5. The developer shall develop the property in accordance with the applicable provisions of previously approved City Council Ordinance No. 1157 and City Council Resolution No. 3660. 6. The applicant shall indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees from and against any all claim, actions, causes of action, proceedings or suits which challenge or attack the validity of the City's approval of Environmental Assessment EA-411 and Development Agreement Extension 97 -2. PASSED, APOROVED AND ADOPTED this 2&IL day of May, 1998, .2 Bret Bfien d, OCP, grian Crow y, Chairman Direct r of lan ng of the Planning Commission and Building Safety, and of the City of El Segundo, Secretary of the Planning California Commission of the City of El Segundo, California Crowley (Chairman)- Aye Wycoff (Vice - Chairman) - Aye Boulgarides - Absent O'Brien - Aye Palmer -Aye p: \project \401 -425 \ea411 \ea411.res 4 009111, Chairman Crowley presented EA-411 and Development Agreement Extension 97 -2. EA411 Address: 2301 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue, 810 -820 South Douglas Street. Applicant and Property Owner: Continental Development Corporation. DRAFT Mr. Garry presented the Staff Report as outlined in the Agenda Packet. Chairman Crowley stated the Resolution number should be 2419 instead of 2418. Chairman Crowley asked if this is the final 5 -year extension. Mr. Gang stated they could ask for another extension, even though it's not explicit in the current documents. Jerry Saunders, Continental Development Corporation They are here to answer any further questions. The conditions of approval are acceptable. Vice -Chair Wycoff asked what their view of the future for the next five years is. Mr. Saunders stated at the time they entered into this Agreement, there was an understanding that they would probably need to extend it. It took them a couple of years to get Summerfield Suites in to satisfy the condition that they put a hotel in first. Now if they are able to keep this entitlement, it helps them in the battle to get good tenants to El Segundo, if you have land ready to go. The potential tenants come and go and they anticipate with the Manhattan Beach Studios opening, there will be more opportunities coming. Commissioner O'Hearn asked if the extension of Douglas Street to Rosecrans Avenue would have an impact to that site. Mr. Saunders stated yes, both good and bad. Putting Douglas Street through, the positives are that it provides a connection to the north. The negative is that a lot of cars are going to be coming south and will have to stop at Rosecrans and stack up at Aviation and Rosecrans. Chairman Crowley stated it looks straightforward and he has no problem with renewing it. Vice -Chair Wycoff stated business is on the upswing and the development activity has been positive and this has attracted some high class businesses to the area and he is in favor of the extension. Chairman Crowley stated he is favor of the staff's recommendation go back to June 9, 1997 and start the five year extension on that date. Commissioner Palmer moved to adopt with the recommended date change. Commissioner MOTION O'Heam seconded. Passed 4 -0. Chairman Crowley presented EA-428 and Precise Plan Amendment 97 -3 (first amendment EA-428 to PP 4 -77). Address: 1930 -2000 East Imperial Highway. Applicant: Hughes Aircraft Corporation. The applicant has requested to continue the public hearing until June 25, 1998. Chairman Crowley moved to continue. Commissioner Palmer seconded. Passed 4 -0. MOTION Mr. Altmayer presented an oral report on the possible "Downtown Revitalization Fee." REPORT FROM A fee could be instituted to help revitalize portions of downtown. That's not legally DIRECTOR supportable and the reason is because any fee that you impose upon development, has to have a nexus. There has to be a justification for issuing that fee based upon to mitigate an effect of that development. Where you're imposing a traffic fee, it has to be a fee in relation to the amount of traffic that the project is going to generate. If you're taking part 05- 28- 98.min 6 t1 0 `j l Cv CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INTERDEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE MEETING DATE: May 28, 1998 TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission 3 FROM: Bret B. Bernard, Director of Planning and Building Safetyl THROUGH: Laurie B. Jester, Senior Planner STAFF PLANNER: Paul Garry, Assistant Planner f-9 SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment EA -411, Development Agreement 97 -2 Extension to Development Agreement Address: 2301 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue, 810 -820 South Douglas Street Applicant and Property Owner: Continental Development Corporation REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of an Environmental Assessment and a Development Agreement Amendment to extend the term a previously approved Development Agreement by five (5) years for a six story, approximately 290,000 square foot office building and parking structure to be constructed at 2301 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue, and a maximum of 182 -room all suites or full service hotel at 810 -820 South Douglas Street. RECOMMENDATION The Planning staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2418 recommending that the City Council approve Environmental Assessment EA-411 and Development Agreement 97 -2 (Extension); and, find that there are no potential environmental impacts created by the project. BACKGROUND The Staff Report prepared on November 6, 1990 for approval of the original Precise Plan and Development Agreement (Attached) by the City Council provides a detailed background of the prior approvals and other documents which have been developed to implement the overall project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of extending a Development Agreement for the construction of Phase II of a previously approved project. The purpose of the extension is to allow additional time for the development of the Phase II office building and parking structure portion of the approved project. A 122 -room Summerfield Suites was constructed at 810 South Douglas Street to satisfy Phase I of the originally approved development project. Phase II of the project includes a six -story 290,000 1 00'13 square foot office building with a maximum Floor- Area -Ratio of 1.0. The parking structure will be located northeast of the proposed office building and adjacent to an existing identical parking structure which serves an existing 196,000 square foot office building located at 2361 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue. There are no proposed modification to the size, use, parking, or any other aspect of the project originally approved. The site is currently vacant except for landscaping and an existing recreation par course. The site is relatively level. The site is unpaved, contains no unique geologic features, and is a trapezoid shape. The surrounding areas to the west, north and east are developed with office uses, a health club, research and development, restaurants, and hotels. To the south across Rosecrans Avenue are retail uses. The properties to the north, west, and east are zoned Mixed -Use South (MU -S), and to the south is Planned Development (City of Manhattan Beach). The project site is located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo, approximately one quarter -mile west of the San Diego (1 -405) Freeway and two miles south of the Glenn Anderson (1- 105) Freeway. The Metro Green Line and a station at Douglas Street are located adjacent to, and north of, the project site. Local jurisdictions near the site include the City of Los Angeles located north of Imperial Highway, the City of Manhattan Beach located south of Rosecrans Avenue, and the City of Hawthorne located east of Aviation Boulevard. Surrounding land uses are as follows: North: Hotel, Research & Development South: Retail East: Office West: Restaurants, Office, Health Club .M Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Commercial Planned Development (City of Manhattan Beach) Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Mixed -Use South (MU -S) The applicant is requesting approval of an extension to a Development Agreement pursuant to the provisions of State law and City Council Resolution No. 3268. A Development Agreement vests to the developer the right to construct the intended land use and intensity. Vesting a right to construct means that the developer has a guaranteed right for a specified period of time to build an approved project regardless of subsequent planning, zoning or other land use decisions in the City that might otherwise have affected the developer's property. The terms, conditions, schedule and fiscal commitments are essential parts of a Development Agreement, and are subject to public hearing approval by the Planning Commission and City Council and adoption of a Resolution by the City Council. The approved 1992 Development Agreement contains the following provisions: E 00`317 • Developer shall have a term of five (5) years to pull building permits. • The Development Agreement may be extended for a period of five(5) years subject to the approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. The developer shall develop the property in accordance with the applicable provisions of City Council Resolution No. 3660 and Ordinance No. 1157 (these are the original project approvals for the Precise Plan, Development Agreement, Subdivision, and EIR). • The developer shall develop the project in substantial conformance with plans approved by the City and outlined in the 'Description of Project" contained in the Development Agreement. • Developer may not modify the project without City approval. The Director of Planning and Building Safety shall have the auttitarity to determine minor vs. major revisions /alterations and shall require Planning Commission/City Council approval if appropriate. Developer may not transfer or assign the rights of this Development Agreement to another party without the consent of the City. The Development Agreement must be reviewed once every 12 months pursuant to Resolution No. 3268. The City Council may also order a Special Review at any time provided the developer is provided two weeks advance notice. Resolution No. 3268 requires that the Planning Commission make the following determinations in its recommendation to the City Council. That the proposed Development Agreement extension: 1. is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the general plan and any applicable specific plan; 2. is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district in which the real property i- 40cated; 3. is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice; 4. will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare; 5. will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values. If approved, the five (5) year extension request would run from June 9, 1997, which was the original expiration date of the Development Agreement. Staff and the City Attorney do not believe the extended Development Agreement should commence on the date the extension is approved or recorded. This would effectively give the applicant a six (6) year extension, instead of five (5) years because the application has been incomplete for almost a full year. Staff has incorporated this into Draft Resolution No. 2418 as a Condition of Approval to modify Section No. 1 of the extension document to that affect. w 3 0 00 ; r General Plan and Zoning The General Plan land use designation for the site is Urban Mixed -Use South. This designation allows offices at a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.3. The site is zoned MU -S (Mixed -Use South), which permits general offices, financial institutions, hotels, restaurants, research and development uses, and motion picture /television production facilities. When the project was originally approved in 1990, the property was zoned Heavy Industrial (M -2) and designated Commercial Manufacturing (C -M) in the General Plan Land Use Element. A Precise Plan (PP 89 -2) was approved in 1990 to enable the project to be constructed in the M -2 zone which did not allow offices and hotels as permitted uses. The proposed FAR of 1.0 would be less than current standard of the MU -S Zone (1.3) but is equal to the 1.0 FAR standard for the M -2 Zone in effect at the time of approval of the original Precise Plan (1990) and Development Agreement (1992). No change in the proposed density is proposed as part of this project extension. Section 8.1 of the Development Agreement permits the applicant to apply for a five (5) year extension of the Development Agreement subject to the discretionary review by the Planning Commission and City Council. Additional conditions of approval, above and beyond the mitigation measures required by CEQA, may be imposed through the Development Agreement extension process in order to make the required Development Agreement findings. Many General Plan goals, policies and objectives related to Economic Development, Land Use, Circulation and Air Quality apply to the proposed project. Specifically, Land Use Policy LU 4 -3.2, and Objective 4-4 which encourages mixed -use developments near green line stations and provides for mixed developments to provide synergistic relationships which can maximize economic benefits, reduce traffic impacts and encourage pedestrian environments. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A draft Initial Study was prepared by City Staff for the project to evaluate the potential adverse environmental impacts related to the five (5) year extension. No significant adverse environmental impacts were identified, and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts is proposed. The draft Initial Study has been circulated for City inter - departmental review and comments, as required by City Council Resolution No. 3805 and State CEQA guidelines. A Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts has been prepared. A final Initial Study will be prepared by Staff based on any mitigation measures that might be required by the Planning Commission; and based on any comments received by other City departments. On November 6, 1990, the City Council of the City of El Segundo adopted Resolution No. 3660 certifying an Addendum to the Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EA -206) covering the project as adequate and complete and adopting findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations (due to traffic and air quality impacts) as required by CEQA. The project consisted of a Precise Plan (PP89 -2), Lot Line Adjustment (SUB 90 -10), and Development Agreement to construct a 182 -room hotel and 290,000 square foot office buildings on two parcels at 2301 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue and 810 -820 South Douglas Street. Three Environmental Impact Reports have been prepared for projects proposed on the site: 1) Final Environmental Impact Report for Continental Phase V (certified, August 1986); 2) Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City initiated Zone Change (SCH #85091815 - September, 1987); and 3) Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park Phase V 4 00 "1ill) (certified March, 1988). The Addendum to the Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report certified in 1990 was based on the three previous EIR's for the project. Staff and the City Attorney determined an Initial Study should be prepared because the Development Agreement extension is considered a project under CEOA. Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared by staff. INTER- DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS The project application and plans have been circulated to inter - departmental staff. With the exception of the City Manager, no comments were received from the City department heads. The City Manager requested clarification of two issues. First, he asked if the right to build the remaining 60 hotel rooms that were not built as part of Phase I of the project was also being extended. Secondly, he inquired if there was a requirement that the 60 hotel rooms not constructed as part of Phase I be built prior to the construction of the Phase II office building. In response to the first issue, the extension of the Development Agreement would permit all of the project approvals to be extended by five years. This would include the right to build a 182 -unit hotel on the Phase I property. As a practical matter, a 122 -unit Summerfield Suites Hotel has been constructed on the Phase I parcel, so the likelihood of this being replaced by a new 182 room hotel is small. The Summerfield Suites Hotel could be expanded by 60 units provided the hotel could still meet all of the development standards (i.e., floor -area ratio, parking, and landscaping) contained in the approved Precise Plan. The nature of a Precise Plan also means that the 60 remaining units could only be located as shown on the original Precise Plan which means they could not be on the office building parcel. Additionally, Condition of Approval No. 40 of Ordinance No. 1157 and Resolution No. 3660 specifically prohibits the transfer of floor area from one parcel to another. Therefore, to be in conformance with the Precise Plan, the additional rooms would have to be on the parcel on which Summerfield Suites Hotel is located. It should be noted that the developer is not proposing to add any additional hotels rooms at this time, even though the Development Agreement would allow it as long as the Development Agreement is in effect. In response to the second issue raised by the City Manager, them is no requirement in the project approvals (Ordinance No. 1157 and Resolution No. 3660) or the Development Agreement which requires the full build out of the hotel portion of the project to 182 units. Section 1.1 of the Development Agreement implies less that 182 units could be constructed by stating the project approved a "maximum" of 182 units. Condition No. 50 of Ordinance No. 1157 and Condition No. 51 of Resolution No. 3660 required that the hotel be constructed prior to the proposed office building. These conditions were meet by the construction of the 122 -room Summerfield Suites Hotel. Additionally, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 3850, on December 21, 1993, approving a Transient Occupancy Tax Credit Agreement for Summerfield Suites Hotel which acknowledged that the hotel would be a minimum 122 -rooms with no requirement that additional rooms be provided. Therefore, no additional hotel rooms would have to built prior to the construction of the office building. EXHIBITS A. (9faft) Reselutiom No. 2418 B. (Draft) Consent to the Extension of Development Agreement C. (Approved) 1992 Development Agreement (including attachments) 5 0 ) ? - C D. City Council Staff Report, dated November 6, 1990 E. City Council Resolution No. 3850 F. Initial Study, dated April 29, 1998 G. Applications Prepared by: Paul Garry Assistant Planner Reviewed by: Laurie B. Jester Senior Planner Approved by: / 1 I Bret B Ber ard, AI P Dire or of/Plan i and Building Safety, and Secretary to the Planning Commission L p Aprojects\401- 425ba4111ea411.sr 009?1 EXHIBIT 1 TO APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of El Segundo 350 South Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 1 .., d• This document is recorded free -exempt under Government Code Section 6103 for the benefit of a public agency. CONSENT TO THE EXTENSION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION �� / H � WHEREAS, a Development Agreement ( "Development Agreement" herein) by and between the City of El Segundo and Continental Development Corporation, a California corporation, was entered on March 18, 1992, and was recorded in the Official Records of the Recorders Office, Los Angeles County, California, on June 10, 1992 as Instrument No. 92- 1056312;and WHEREAS, before the Agreement expired on June 9, 1997, Continental Development Corporation applied for an extension to the City of El Segundo by a letter request from Mr. J. A. Saunders, dated April 10, 1997, with respect to a five -year extension pursuant to Paragraph 8.1 of the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the parties desire and have determined that the Development Agreement should be extended for a five -year period commencing upon the date of recording of this document; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following: 1. The Development Agreement is hereby extended by mutual written consent for a five -year period commencing on the date of the recording of this document in the Official Records of the Recorders Office of Los Angeles County, California. 2. All other Terms and Conditions of the Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Executed this day of , 1998. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO By: Mayor Attest: CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION By: By: City Clerk Richard Lundquist President By: Leonard E. Blakesley, Jr. Secretary 0C:1�23 Wjzj /RVW /AGR72 951f RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of E1 Segundo 350 South Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 This document is recorded fee - exempt under Government Code Section 6103 for the benefit of a public agency. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO F,IDIRP FREE - R RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDER'S OFFICE LOS ANGEI.ES COUNTY CALIFOPNIA 21 MIN. 3 P.M. JUN 10 1992 FAST. CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 271992 �� i -i- n 21 92- 1056312 L-FZ TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE RECITALS..................... ..............................2 I. DEFINITIONS ........... ..............................5 II. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY .........................8 2.1 Binding Effect .. ..............................8 2.2 Title to Property .............................8 2.3 Rights to Develop .............................9 2.4 Effect of Agreement on Applicable Rules ...... 10 2.5 Changes to Project and Amendments ............ 10 2.6 Parcelization ... .............................11 2.7 Subsequent CEQA Review ......................oil 2.8 Subsequent Project Approvals .................12 2.9 Timing of Development.... o ................. o.12 2.10 Reservations of Authority. ................... 13 2.11 Modification or Suspension by State or Federal Law ..... .............................15 2.12 Intent.......... .............................16 2.13 Public Works .... .............................16 2.14 Regulation by Other Public Agencies ....... ...16 III. PUBLIC BENEFITS.... o ........ o ... o ....... **o ........ 17 3.1 Company's Conditions and obligations ......... 17 IV. REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE . .............................17 4.1 Periodic Review . .............................17 4.2 Special Review .. .............................18 -i- n 21 92- 1056312 L-FZ V. VI. VIZ. VIII. DEFAULTSAND REMEDIES..** .... * ..... * .......... * .... 19 5.1 Specific Performance .........................19 5.2 Termination or Modification of Agreement for Default of Company ....................... 20 5.3 Termination of Agreement for Default of City ......... .............................20 LEGALACTIONS ......... .............................21 6.1 Third Party Litigation Concerning Agreement..21 6.2 Indemnity ....... .............................22 6.3 Environmental Assurances ..................... 23 6.4 Reservation of Rights ........................ 23 6.5 Attorney's Fees . .............................24 6.6 Certain Obligations Not Recourse .............24 6.7 Survival ........ .............................25 MORTGAGEPROTECTION ... .............................25 7.1 Estoppel Certificate .........................25 7.2 Mortgagee Protection; Certain Rights of Cure ......... .............................26 (a) Mortgagee Protection .................... 26 (b) Mortgagee Not Obligated..... ............ 26 (c) Notice of Default to Mortgagee; Right of Mortgagee to Cure.... ... o .... —26 (d) Failure of Mortgagee to Complete Improvements ............................28 MISCELLANEOUS......... .............................29 8.1 Term ............ .............................29 8.2 Permitted Delays. ... o.o ........ oo ........ o ... 30 8.3 Public Agency Delays.......... ........ oo .... o30 -ii- 92- 1056312 uO�2 8.4 City Delays ..... .............................31 8.5 Termination ..... .............................31 8.6 Covenants Run With the Land ..................32 8.7 Relationship of Parties ......................33 8.8 Transfer ........ .............................33 8.9 Release of Transferring Owner ................35 8.10 Subsequent Assignment ........................36 8.11 Notices ......... .............................36 8.12 Amendment or Cancellation ....................37 8.13 Recordation of Agreement ..................... 37 8.14 Entire Agreement .............................37 8.15 Severability .... .............................38 8.16 Interpretation and Governing Law .............38 8.17 Section Headings .............................39 8.18 Singular and Plural ..........................39 8.19 Joint and Several obligations ................39 8.20 Time of Essence . .............................39 8.21 No Third Party Beneficiaries ................. 39 8.22 Counterparts .... .............................39 8.23 Further Actions and Instruments ..............40 8.24 Eminent Domain .. .............................40 8.25 Authority to Execute .........................40 -iii- 92- 1056312 "4010. WPX /RVW /AGR72951f THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is entered into by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California ( "City "), and Continental Development Corporation, a California corporation, ( "Company "). EECZTSLA A. To.strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California adopted the Development Agreement Act, Government Code Sections 65864 - 65869.5, which authorizes any city to enter into binding development agreements establishing certain development rights in real property with persons having legal or equitable interests in such property for the purpose of establishing certain development rights in the property which is the subject of a development project application. B. Company is the owner in fee of certain real property located in the City and consisting of 9.69 acres to be subdivided into lots of 6.75 acres and 2.94 acres as more r i sz -io5FWi2 ?-W" WPX /RVW /AGR72951f particularly described in Exhibit A (legal description) and B (site plan) attached and incorporated here. C. Company and City acknowledge that it is the intention of Company to transfer Parcel 2 of the afore- described real property together with the development rights thereto. D. Pursuant to the Development Agreement Act, City has adopted rules and regulations establishing procedures and requirements for development agreements. Such rules and regulations are set forth in Resolution No. 3268 which was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City on June 26, 1984; E. On September 13, 1990 the Planning Commission of the City recommended to the City Council by Resolution No. 2291 approval of the Project and certification that the Addendum to the Addendum to the subsequent Final Environmental Impact Report (EA -206) covering the Project is adequate and complete, adoption of findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations as required by the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (City Resolution No. 3517), and imposition of certain mitigation measures as conditions of the City's issuance to the Company of building permits and Certificates of Occupancy for the Project. -2- C 92- 1056312 '; {; WPX /RVW /AGR72951f F. On November 6, 1990 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 3660 certifying the Addendum to the Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EA -206) covering the project as adequate and complete and adopting findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations as required by the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (City Resolution No. 3517), and approving Subdivision 90 -10 a Lot Line Adjustment for Parcel Map No. 17158, and a Development Agreement with the imposition of certain mitigation measures as conditions of the City's issuance to the Company of building permits and Certificates of Occupancy for the Project. Further, on November 6, 1990 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1157 approving Precise Plan No. 89 -2 with the imposition of certain mitigation measures as conditions of the City's issuance to the Company of building permits and Certificates of Occupancy for the Project. G. Company applied for this Development Agreement on September 27, 1989. Thereafter, in accordance with Resolution No. 3268, City has undertaken the necessary proceedings, has found and determined that this Agreement is consistent with the General Plan and each of its elements and with the City's Zoning Code, and has adopted Ordinance No. 1157 and Resolution No. 3660 approving this Agreement, which Ordinance becomes effective on December 6, 1990; 92- 1056312 A 60 13�` WPX /RVW /AGR72951f S H. This Agreement will provide for the orderly development of the Project, assure the attainment of the public objectives and benefits described, and otherwise achieve the goals and purposes for which the Development Agreement Act and Resolution No. 3268 were enacted; I. In exchange for these and other benefits to City, Company wishes to obtain reasonable assurances that, having received all necessary approvals for the Project Company may develop the Project in accordance with the Applicable Rules and with the conditions established in the Project Approval. Because of the nature of the Project, the development of the Project will take a long period of time to complete. The decision by the Company to commence the Project is based on expectations of proceeding with the Project to completion. In the absence of this Agreement, Company would have less assurance that it can complete the Project. The potential loss of anticipated revenue associated with the risk and uncertainty that the City might halt the Project at a point short of total build -out, defer or delay completion of the Project, or apply new ordinances, rules, regulations or official policies to the Project in such a manner as to significantly increase the cost or reduce the size of the Project, could, in the absence of this Agreement, deter and discourage Company from making a long -term commitment to the implementation of the Project. 92- 1056312 0013-1- WPX /RVW /AGR72951f Accordingly, Company cannot prudently develop the Project without reasonable assurance that it will be able to complete the Project in accordance with the Project Approval, and it is the assurance of the ability to complete the Project in accordance with the Project Approval that provides part of the inducement to Company to agree to commit the land and financial resources represented by the Project, including expenditures required to satisfy the conditions of the Project Approval. I. DEFINITIONS For all purposes of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires: A. "Applicable Rules" means, as provided for in Government Code S 65866, all ordinances, resolutions, codes, rules, regulations and official policies of City, existing on the effective date of this Agreement governing the development and use of land, governing permitted uses of land, density, design, improvement, and construction standards and specifications, including, general and specific plans, and those covering zoning, subdivisions, development standards and dedications and the Project Approvals, as hereafter def fined in Subsection "J" herein and the density or intensity of land use. "Applicable Rules" 92- 1455312 0 0'13 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f /v shall not include building, fire, plumbing or electrical codes nor any other City ordinance, resolution, code, rule, regulation or official policy not delineated above. B. "City" means the City of El Segundo. C. "Development" means the improvement of the Property for the purposes of completing the structures, improvements and facilities comprising the Project, including, but not limited to: grading; the construction of infrastructure and public facilities related to the Project whether located within or outside the Property; the construction of buildings and structures; and the installation of landscaping. "Development" does not include the maintenance, repair, reconstruction or redevelopment of any building, structure, improvement or facility after the construction and completion thereof. D. "Development Agreement Act" means Sections 65864 S_t sec. of the California Government Code, as they exist on the date of execution of this Agreement and as they may be amended from time to time. E. "Discretionary Action; Discretionary Approval" means an action or approval which requires the exercise of judgment, deliberation or a decision on the part of City, including any board, commission or department and any officer or employee thereof, in the process of approving or disapproving a particular activity, as distinguished from an -6- 92- 1056312 U WPX /RVW /AGR72951f activity which merely requires City, including any board, commission or department and any officer or employee thereof, to determine whether there has been compliance with applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations or the conditions of previous approvals. F. "Exhibits" means the following documents which are attached to and incorporated herein by this reference: EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT B PROJECT APPROVALS EXHIBIT C CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 3660 EXHIBIT D CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 1157 G. "Effective Date" means the date on which this Agreement is recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder's Office, which shall be within (10) days after execution of this Agreement by City. H. "General Plan" means the General Plan of the City of El Segundo. The General Plan provisions which shall apply to the development permitted by this agreement shall be those of the General Plan in effect upon the effective date of this agreement. I. "Project" means the development within Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map 17158 of a mixed -use complex comprised of office and ancillary retail and /or restaurant space, and -7- 92- 10541312 I 00,�3�- WPX /RVW /AGR72951f a maximum of 182 room residential inn with kitchens and /or a full service hotel, and retail sales and service as set out in Exhibit D (City Council Ordinance No. 1157). J. "Project Approval" means all existing permits and other entitlements for use approved or issued prior to the date of recordation of this agreement, as set out in Exhibit B, parcel maps, conditional use permits, specific plans and amendments, zoning, grading and building permits. K. "Property" means the approximately 9.6 acres located in the City, as more particularly described on Exhibit A. L. "Subsequent Applicable Rules" means Applicable Rules amended or adopted after the effective date of this agreement. M. "Subsequent Project Approvals" means all Project Approvals required by law or city policy after the effective date of this agreement. 2.1 Binding Effect. Development of the Property hereby is authorized and shall be carried out only in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 2.2 Title to Property. Company represents and covenants that it is the owner of the fee simple title to the Property or a portion thereof. -8- 92- 1055312 c o wPX /RVW /AGR72951f 2.3 Rights to Develou. Subject to the terms of this Agreement including the reservations of authority set out in Section 2.10, Company shall have a vested right to develop the Property in accordance with, and to the extent of, the Applicable Rules and Project Approvals. The Project shall remain subject to all Subsequent Project Approvals required to complete the Project. Said Subsequent Project Approvals shall be made pursuant to the Applicable Rules as described in IA above. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the permitted uses of the Property, the density and intensity of use, the design and maximum height and size of proposed buildings, timing and phasing of Development and provisions for reservation and dedication of land for public purposes and all other terms and conditions of development shall be those set forth in the Applicable Rules defined in IA above, provided however, that: (a) The uses for Parcels 2 & 3 shall be those permitted in the Project Approvals attached hereto as Exhibit "B ". (b) The density of the project shall be maximum of 1:1 FAR as calculated according to City's Municipal Code Section 20.42.080 as adopted in ordinance 1050 based on net remaining acreage after all dedications required by project approvals. -9- 92- 1056312 �0�36 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f (c) The maximum height of any Project structure shall be 84 feet excluding mechanical penthouses and other projections specifically allowed by Code Section 20.08.080 of the E1 Segundo Municipal Code as adopted in ordinance 1137. 2.4 Effect of Agreement on Applicable Rules. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, including Section 2.10, any amendments to the Applicable Rules adopted after the effective date and prior to any expiration or termination of this agreement shall not be applicable to the property without Company's written consent thereto. 2.5 Changes to Project and Amendments. The parties acknowledge that refinement and further development of the Project will require Subsequent Project Approvals and may demonstrate that changes are appropriate and mutually desirable in the existing Project Approvals. In the event that a change in the existing Project Approvals is necessary or appropriate, Company shall; if required by then existing law or City policy, apply for a Subsequent Project Approval for such change. If City law or policy does not require a formal subsequent project approval, the Director of Planning may agree to the proposed change without further procedures required. Any Subsequent Project Approval which does not change the density, phasing, building heights or proportion -10- E 92 -112 0 J WPX /RVW /AGR72951f of office, hotel and retail space permitted in the Project shall not require an amendment to this Agreement and shall be subject to the Applicable Rules. Any Subsequent Project Approval which significantly changes the density, phasing, building heights or proportion of office, hotel and retail space permitted in the Project shall be subject to the Subsequent Applicable Rules, and shall not be effective until this Agreement has been amended to reflect such action. Any such Subsequent Project Approvals shall be incorporated into Exhibit B. 2.6 Parcelization. Subject to Section 2.5, Company shall have the right, from time to time or at any time, to reconfigure the parcels comprising the Property as shown on the Parcel Map Approval, as may be necessary in order to develop a particular phase of the Project, or to lease or finance a portion of the Property in connection with the development of the Project. 2.7 Subsequent CEOA Review. Any changes to the project deemed to be "substantial changes" pursuant to Public Resources Code S 21166 shall require full compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") as determined by City. Upon CEQA compliance any such change shall require project approvals pursuant to the subsequent applicable rules and amendment of this agreement to reflect -11- 92- 1056312 Mow I A-W. WNW 10 0038 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f said change. Any such change shall be reflected in a modified Exhibit H. 2.8 Suhsegu nt Project Approvals. City shall accept for processing, review and action all applications for Subsequent Project Approvals, and such applications shall be processed promptly in the normal manner for processing such matters. The City's review and processing shall be conducted under Section 2.5. During the preparation of materials necessary for such approvals, the staffs of City and Company may hold regular progress meetings as needed for coordination and may communicate and consult informally as frequently as necessary. Upon Company's request and payment of City costs, City may retain contract employees or consultants or authorize overtime hours to expedite such processing. 2.9 Timing of Development. The parties acknowledge that Company cannot at this time predict when or the rate at which phases of the Property will be developed. Such decision depends upon numerous factors which are not within the control of Company, such as market orientation and demand, interest rates, absorption, completion and other similar factors. Since the California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo (1984) 37 Cal.3d 465, that the failure of the parties therein to provide for the timing of development -12- is 92 -10W12 GI 0 3 9 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f resulted in a later- adopted initiative restricting the timing of development prevailing over such parties' agreement, it is the parties' intent to cure that deficiency by acknowledging and providing that Company shall have the right to develop the Property in such order and at such rate and at such times as Company deems appropriate within the exercise of its subjective business judgment, subject only to any timing or phrasing requirements set forth in the Applicable Rules and Project Approvals. 2.10 Reservations of Authority. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the following Subsequent Applicable Rules shall apply to the development of the Property. (a) Processing fees and charges of every kind and nature imposed by City to cover the estimated actual costs to City of processing applications for Development approvals for the property, including but not limited to environmental review or for monitoring compliance with any Development approvals or CEQA mitigation measures issued or imposed. (b) Procedural regulations which are not substantive relating to hearing bodies, petitions, applications, notices, findings, records, hearings, reports, recommendations, appeals and any other matter of procedure. -13- 92- 1056312 00,940 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f .1 (c) Regulations governing construction standards and specifications including, without limitation, the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electric Code, Uniform Fire Code and Standard Specifications for Public Works Contracts. (d) City agrees not to increase or duplicate any exactment or fee imposed pursuant to Exhibits C and D. City reserves the right to impose any taxes, and exactments, fees or assessments adopted after the effective date of this agreement which apply uniformly throughout the City or within a defined area of benefit which includes the property. However, Company shall have no total liability for fees and exactments not imposed in Exhibits C and D and adopted prior to Company obtaining building permits beyond a total sum equal to three cents (3C) per square foot of building area. (e) In emergency situations, as determined by the E1 Segundo City Council, regulations which, although in conflict with the Project Approvals and Applicable Rules, are necessary to protect against an imminent threat to the public health and safety. To the extent possible, any such regulations shall be applied and construed so as to provide Company with the rights and assurances provided under this Agreement. -14- • 92- 1056312 0 00 4 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f +. (f) Regulations which are in conflict with the Project Approvals and Applicable Rules provided Owner has given written consent for the application of such regulations to development of the Property. WTr aw. In the event that State or Federal laws or regulations, enacted after the Effective Date of this Agreement, prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, then to the extent feasible such provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such State or Federal laws or regulations; provided, however, that this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the extent it is not inconsistent with such laws or regulations and to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such remaining provisions impractical to enforce. Immediately after enactment of any such new law, the parties shall meet and confer in good faith to determine the feasibility of any such modification or suspension based on the effect such modification or suspension would have on the purposes and intent of this Agreement. If such modification or suspension is unfeasible in Company's reasonable business judgment, then Company shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by written notice to the City. In addition, Company shall have the right to -15- 92--1056312 C, WPX /RVW /AGR72951f challenge the new law preventing compliance with the terms of this Agreement, and, in the event such challenge is successful, this Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. 2.12 Intent. The parties acknowledge and agree that City is restricted in its authority to limit its police power by contract and that the foregoing limitations, reservations and exceptions are intended to reserve to City all of its police power which cannot be so limited. This Agreement shall be construed, contrary to its stated terms if necessary, to reserve to City all such power and authority which cannot be restricted by contract. 2.13 Public Works. If Company is required by this Agreement to construct any public works facilities which will be dedicated to City or any other public agency upon completion, and if required by applicable laws to do so, Company shall perform such work in the same manner and subject to the same requirements as would be applicable to City or to such other public agency should it have undertaken such construction. acknowledged by the parties that other public agencies not within the control of City may possess authority to regulate aspects of the development of the Property separately from or jointly with City and this Agreement does not limit the .J 92- 1056312 0 ,; 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A FIVE (5) YEAR EXTENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 97 -2 FOR PROPERTY AT 2301 -2381 ROSECRANS AND 810 -820 SOUTH DOUGLAS STREET AND CERTIFICATION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA- 411. PETITIONED BY CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. WHEREAS, an application has been received from Continental Development Corporation, requesting approval of an Environmental Assessment and a five (5) year extension to a Development Agreement to allow the continued development rights for Phase II of a hotel and office development on 9.69 acres located at 2301 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue and 810 -820 South Douglas Street in the Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone; and, WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment (EA411), including a Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for the proposed use, has been prepared and circulated to all interested parties and Staff, for review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and supporting evidence with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act, State CEQA Guidelines and the City of El Segundo Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No. 3805); and, WHEREAS, on May 28, 1998, the Planning Commission did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law; and the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2419 on May 28, 1998 recommending approval of the proposed extended Development Agreement and, WHEREAS, on June 16, 1998, the City Council did hold, pursuant to law, a duly advertised public hearing on such matter in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 350 Main Street, and notice of the public hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law; WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons present to speak for or against the findings of Environmental Assessment EA-41 l and Development Agreement Extension 97 -2; and, WHEREAS, at said hearing the following facts were established: I . The project site consists of 9.69 acres. The project consists of a hotel with a maximum of 182 rooms (Phase I) and a 290,000 square foot office building and parking structure (Phase II), each with a maximum floor area ratio of 1.0. A 122 -room Summerfield Suites Hotel was constructed to satisfy the hotel portion of the project. The subject proposal complies with all applicable requirements of the underlying Heavy Industrial (M -2) Zone, which was the zoning in effect at the time of approval of the original Development Agreement. 4. The subject proposal is to complete a previously approved project, specifically Phase II, covered by the following previous approvals and agreements: Environmental Assessment EA -206, Subdivision 89 -10 for a Lot Line Adjustment to Parcel Map No. 17158, and a Development Agreement were approved by City Council Resolution No. 3660 on 1 10 094 November 6, 1990, certifying an Addendum to an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park Phase V and adopting mitigation measures for a project consisting of maximum 182 - room hotel and a 290,000 square foot office tower and related parking structure at the northeast corner of Rosecrans Avenue and Douglas Street (2301 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue and 810 -20 South Douglas Street). Precise Plan 89 -2 was also approved on November 6, 1990 by City Council Ordinance No. 1157 to allow the proposed uses in the Heavy Industrial (M -2) Zone. A Development Agreement (Instrument No. 92- 1056312) was executed on June 10, 1992 pursuant to which the City granted the Developer the right to construct the project in accordance with the rules, regulations, zoning, and official policies existing at the time. Section 8.1 of the Development Agreement allows the applicant to apply for a five (5) year extension subject to a discretionary review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. The current Urban Mixed -Use South (MU -S) zoning for the site is consistent with the current General Plan Land Use designation of the site for Urban Mixed -Use South. The subject proposal is consistent with the intent of the MU -S zoning designation by allowing for hotel and office uses. 6. The surrounding areas to the west, north and east are developed with office uses, a health club, research and development, restaurants, and hotels. To the south across Rosecrans Avenue are retail uses. The properties to the north, west, and east are zoned Mixed -Use South (MU -S), and to the south is Planned Development (City of Manhattan Beach). 7. The project site is located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo, approximately one quarter -mile west of the San Diego (I -405) Freeway and two miles south of the Glenn Anderson (1 -105) Freeway. The Metro Green Line and a station at Douglas Street are located adjacent to, and north of, the project site. Local jurisdictions near the site include the City of Los Angeles located north of Imperial Highway, the City of Manhattan Beach located south of Rosecrans Avenue, and the City of Hawthorne located east of Aviation Boulevard. 9. The proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with State guidelines and local requirements, a Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration was prepared and circulated for public and interdepartmental review. No significant adverse impacts were identified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after considering the above facts and study of proposed Environmental Assessment EA-411 and Development Agreement Extension 97 -2, the City Council makes the following findings and approves a five (5) year extension to the original Development Agreement and certifies the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts: 1. The Draft Initial Study was made available for public review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by law. The Initial Study concluded that the proposed project will not have a significant, adverse effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact will be prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and 2. That when considering the whole record, there is no evidence that the project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends, because the project is in a built - out urban environment; and 2 0 0')45 3. That the Planning Commission thereby recommends that the City Council authorize and direct the Director of Planning and Building Safety to file with the appropriate agencies a Certificate of Fee Exemption and de minimis finding pursuant to AB 3158 and the California Code of Regulations. Within ten (10) days of the approval of the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts, the applicant shall submit to the City of El Segundo a fee of $25.00 required by the County of Los Angeles for the filing of this certificate along with the required Notice of Determination. As approved in AB 3158, the statutory requirements of CEQA will not be met and no vesting shall occur until this condition is met and the required notices and fees are filed with the County. The applicant is requesting approval of a five (5) year extension to a Development Agreement, pursuant to the provisions of state law, City Council Resolution No. 3268, and Section 8.1 of the Development Agreement. 2. The extended Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan. 3. The extended Development Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district in which the real property is located. 4. The extended Development Agreement is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice. The extended Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare. 6. The extended Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values. That the proposed use is consistent with the following General Plan Land Use policy and objective: LU 4 -3.4 and LU 4-4. This policy and objective encourages mixed -use developments near green line stations and provides for mixed developments to provide synergistic relationships which can maximize economic benefits, reduce traffic impacts and encourage pedestrian environments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council approves Environmental Assessment EA-411 and Development Agreement Extension 97 -2, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to execution and recording, the applicant shall amend Section No. 1 of the Consent to Extension of Development Agreement to indicate that the five year extension shall commence on June 9, 1997, not the date of recording of the document. 2. Within 60 days of approval by the City Council, the Consent to Extension of Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded. If the Consent to Extension of Development Agreement is not recorded within this time period, approval of the extension shall be null and void. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of the previously recorded Development Agreement (recorded on June 10, 1992), 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for Phase II, the applicant shall develop plans which indicate that the project is in substantial conformance with plans approved and on file with the Department of Planning and 3 00946 Building Safety and further outlined in the "project description" and provisions contained in the original Development Agreement. Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred to the Director of Planning and Building Safety for a determination regarding the need for Planning Commission review of the proposed modification. The developer shall develop the property in accordance with the applicable provisions of previously approved City Council Ordinance No. 1157 and City Council Resolution No. 3660. The applicant shall indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees from and against any all claim, actions, causes of action, proceedings or suits which challenge or attack the validity of the City's approval of Environmental Assessment EA-411 and Development Agreement Extension 97 -2. ATTEST: Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of .tune. 1998, 4 Mike Gordon, Mayor of the City of El Segundo, California p: \ project\ 401 -425 \ ea411 \ ea411- cc.res ATTACHMENT "A" TO INITIAL STUDY APPLICANT QUESTIONNAIRE ACCOMPANYING APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DATED 3/9198 B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject Project is the request for extension of an existing Development Agreement (Project). The Project covered by the Development Agreement was environmentally cleared in November 1990 by City of El Segundo Resolution 3660. Resolution No. 3660 certified Environmental Assessment No. EA -206, Addendum to the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park Phase V and adopted a statement of overriding consideration, and approved 90- 10/lot line adjustment for Parcel Map 17158, and approved a Development Agreement for a mixed use project at 2301 — 23 81 Rosecrans Avenue/810 -820 Douglas Street. It is the opinion of the Applicant that pursuant to paragraph 2.7 of the Development Agreement (Agreement), this application for approval of extension of the term of the Agreement does not constitute "substantial changes" as set forth in Public Resources Code § 21166. Therefore, no additional environmental assessment under the California Environmental Quality Act is required. The physical improvements approved for the subject site as well as the development standards and other conditions of approval are contained in City Council Ordinance No. 1157 labeled Exhibit D to the Development Agreement. For information purposes only, presented below is a brief summary of the approved improvements and development standards contained in Ordinance No. 1157. The City Council approved a Precise Plan and a Development Agreement "to allow a 6 -story office building and associated parking structure, and a 6 -story, 182 room residence inn with kitchen facilities or a full- service hotel, for property at 2301 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue / 810 Douglas Street." Condition No. 51 of Ordinance No. 1157 required that "no building permit will be issued for the office building prior to permits being issued for the residence inn/hotel and substantial construction progress made." The 122 -unit Summerfield Suites Hotel at 820 Douglas Street (Parcel 2) is currently in operation. Other major approved development standards are as follows: 0 4 U � U 1. Site size: approximately 9.69 acres (approx. 422,096 square feet): • Parcel 2: 2.94 acres, approx. • Parcel 3: 6.75 acres. approx. Total 9.69 acres approx. 2. Total square footage of building(s) or structure(s): each lot approved for 1:1 FAR. This is below current allowable 1.3:1 FAR • Parcel 2: 128,096 square feet, approx. • Parcel 3: 294.030 souare feet. approx. Total 422,096 square feet, approx. 3. Number of floors of construction: Unknown at this time. Maximum building height: 84 feet, as defined in E.S.M.C. Section 20.08.080. 4. Amount of on -site parking provided: "parking in conformance with code requirements ". 5. Proposed scheduling: Unknown 6. Associated projects: Summerfield Suites Hotel on Lot 2 of Parcel Map No. 17158. 7. If residential, ... size expected. N /A. 8. The project is approved for business park, R & D, commercial offices, hotel, restaurants, and retail. The project is city /community oriented, and is approved for a 1:1 FAR Loading facilities: per code. The project site is located within the eastern portion of Continental Park within the City of El Segundo. The site is bounded by Rosecrans Avenue on the south, the Santa Fe Railway/MTA (Metro Green Line) right -of - -way on the north, the Continental Park Terrace office building on the east, and Douglas Street on the west. The project site contains one existing structure on Parcel 2: the Summerfield Suites Hotel at 820 South Douglas Street. This 3 -story all- suites hotel contains 122 apartment -style suites with living rooms, fully equipped kitchens, and meeting accommodations. Parcel 3 is currently undeveloped except for the existing recreation par course. An index map locating photos of the project site is attached as Exhibit 1. Photos are attached and labeled Exhibits 2 through 4. C. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The Project was environmentally cleared in November 1990 by City of El Segundo Resolution No. 3660. Please refer to item B. above. 2 „V4 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The Project was environmentally cleared in November 1990 by City of El Segundo Resolution No. 3660. Please refer to item B. above. Rev. 3/25/98 10:34 AM C: my doaUS Anwh DA 97 -1 L: 0 5 0 DEPARTMENT OF PLANN G ^'' 350 Main Stre AND BUILDING SAFETY PL F ►n�� EI Segundo, CA 9024- (310) 3224670 FAX (310) 3224167 INITIAL STUDY APPLICANT OUESTIONNAIRE A. 2ENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name, address and phone number of current property owner. Continental Development Corporation, 2041 Rosecrans Ave., Suite 200, El Segundo 310 - 640 -1520 (Note: Property owners signature is required on Page 6 and 7) 2. Address of projecr 2301 -2381 Rosecrans Ave./810-820 Douglas Street Assessors Block and Lot No.: 4138- 011 -036 and 37 3. Name, address, and telephone number of applicant, including name of person to be contacted concerning this proles (H different from Property Owner): Same as above -- Jerry Saunders (Note: Applicant's signature Is required on Page 7) 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state, and federal agencies: None 5. Existingzonin districC Urban Mixed -usp South (MU -S) pro c, Development Agreement 97 -1 6. Proposed vse silo (pro so for which this form is filed): P 9 Extension (EA-2P00 S. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Use additional sheets as necessary. See Attachment "A", Item B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. Total square footage of building(s) or structure(s):. 3. Number of floors of construction: 4. Amount of on -site parking provided: S. Proposed scheduling: 6. Associated projects and relationship to larger prg*ffor series of projects: 7. It residential, include the numbs units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale price or rents, and type of household size ed. a. It com , indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of building area, and natwe- e4�isading4e Project No. EA 1 C11 0 15 C. 1. 9. Itindu,Lnal, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and nature of loading facilities. 10. If institutional, indicate the major u ttt' stimatad employment per shift, estimated occupancy, nature of loading facilities provided and community benefit to be deaeftirom.Lhe project. 11. If the project requires a variance, conditional use permit or rezoning application, state�il3a dicate dearly why the application is required. ENVIRONMENTALSEMN3 See Attachment "A ", Item C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 1. scribe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and an' nd any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. h photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. 2. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any ZCVhw4,l . historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, ate.). intensity of land use (one- apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, setback. roar y etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Brief explanations of all answers are required on attachad sheets, or refer to previous responses to hems B and C above. See Attachment "A ", Item D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. YES MAYBE NO Land Use Planning. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with junsdiction over the project? C) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? 2 YE MAYBE NO d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (include a low - income or minority community)? 2 Population and Housing. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? b) induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major lnfrastructurs)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? 3. Geologic Problems. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? b) Seismic ground shaking? C) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? e) Landslides or mudflows? f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? h) Expansive soils? i) Unique geologic or physical features? 4. Water. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns. or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? C) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g.. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? Q Change in the quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifier by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capacity? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? 3 v0r }r'? J �, S. 6. T. S. YE: MAYBE NO h) impacts to groundwater quality? 1) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Air Quality. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? c) After air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any changes in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? Transportatfon/Clrculatfon. Would the proposal result in: a) increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.. sharp curves or dangerous intersections or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? C) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts? Biological Resources. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to, plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? C) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? Energy and Mineral Resources. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? C) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? 4 6 O C,J1" YL MAYBE NO g. Hazards. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? C) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? 10. Noise. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 11. Public Services. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e) Other governmental services? 12 Utilities and Service Systems. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? b) Communications systems? C) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storrs water drainage? n Solid waste disposal? g) Local or regional water supplies? 13. Aesthetics. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? C) Create light or glare? 14. Cultural Resources. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? b) Disturb archaeological resources? 5 0 0 J a a YE: MAYBE NO C) Affect historical resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 13. Recreation. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? a) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 16. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce Me habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below seH- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Callfomta history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve shon -term, to the disadvantage of long - term, environmental goals? C) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in conjunction with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT ,.(We) Continental Development Corporation am (are) the OWNER(S) of the property involved in this application; 1(we) have familiarized myself (ourselves) with the rules and regulation of the City of El Segundo with respect to preparing and filing this application; and the information on all documents and all plans is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief• ttinental D ve t o Co porat ion Je s Si turo ate y s, ice Pres i dent - Planning s Signature Date 6 OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION 1 hereby authorized Jerry Saunders I to act for me in all matters relevant to this application. I unaerstanc that this person will be the primary contact on the project and will sent all information and correspondence. tinental ev ment Corporation Jer y a ers,s t�ce7resident- Planning /Date AFFIDAVIT ,,(We) Continental Development Corporation am (are) the APPLICANT (S) of the property involved in this application: I (we) have familiarized myself (ourselves) with the rules and regulation of the City f El Segundo with respect to preparing and filing this application: and the information on all doc nts and all plans is true correct to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief. Je plicant's ignature ate y a ers, Vice President - Planning Applicant's Signature Date FOR PLANNING DIVISION USE ONLY 13 Copies of Plans 300' Notification Map 3 sets of Property Owner Labels 2 sets of Envelopes with Postage y Required Supplemental Info Sheets Revised06/97 intist -3.gst Fee/Deposit Received S s+Ju0 d e post Date Fled: 3' CA 19-92 Received By. 7 t,0.11517 ATTACHMENT "A^ TO APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DATED 3/9/98 1. DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED PROJECT IN ITS ENTIRETY. INCLUDE INFORMATION ON THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED, MATERIALS TO BE USED, AND TYPE OF USES INVOLVED (LE. BANK, GENERAL OFFICE, RESTAURANT, ETC.). PROVIDE DETAILS ON SQUARE FOOTAGES, HEIGHTS, NUMBER OF STORIES, NUMBER OF PARK lNG SPACES, ETC. Introductory Statement The purpose of this application is to request a five -year extension of the existing Development Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 92 -10563 I2 (Agreement). Section VIII, Subsection 8.1 of the Agreement allows for an extension of up to an additional five (5) years which shall be subject to the discretionary review of the City Planning Commission and City Council. The Development Agreement was entered into in 1992. Under the terms of the Agreement, development of Parcel 2 as a hotel / motel was a condition precedent to development of Parcel 3. Summerfield Suites Hotel opened in 1995. Therefore, approximately three years of the initial five -year Development Agreement term were used in meeting the condition precedent of attracting and developing a hotel on Parcel 2. Continental Development Corporation worked diligently to meet the condition precedent to develop a hotel / motel on Parcel 2. This condition required Continental to depart from its traditional role as an investment builder that acquires, develops, and operates properties. In order to attract a hotel during the poor economic conditions that existed during the early nineties, it was necessary for Continental to sell the property to the hotel developer / operator (Summerfield Suites) at or below its wholesale price. It is the Applicant's belief that a five -year extension of the Development Agreement is in the best interest of both the Applicant and the City of El Segundo for the following reasons: The market conditions of the southern California economy during the period 1992 -1996 were not conducive to the type of development envisioned and intended by the City and Continental at the time the Development Agreement was executed. An extension of the Agreement will permit time for market conditions to allow for development of Parcel 3 to its highest and best use. 2. Keeping Parcel 3 as entitled land ready for development is beneficial to the City and the developer. Entitled land is more attractive to major firms because of the time saved through the elimination of the entitlement process. A case for example is the Manhattan Beach Studios project that was attracted to TRW's entitled land. 3. Extension of the Development Agreement continues the requirement for a maximum 1:1 FAR on this site, instead of the 1:3 FAR that would be permitted under the new MU -S zone. Project Description The Development Agreement approved an approximately 9.69 -acre mixed -use project on Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map No. 17159 located at the northeast corner of Rosecrans Avenue and Douglas Street. Parcel 2 is currently improved with a 3 -story, 122 -suite Summerfield Suites Hotel. Parcel 3 remains undeveloped. 2. PROVIDE A DETAILED EXPLANATION OF HOW THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS SPECIFIED IN THE GENERAL PLAN AND ANY APPLICABLE SPECIFIC PLAN. SPECIFICALLY REFERENCE THE APPLICABLE GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLAN SECTIONS. The Development Agreement was found to be consistent, and is currently consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and programs specified in the General Plan. Specifically, the project is consistent with a long -term goal of the General Plan Land Use Element that supports replacement of heavy industry with clean, quiet, high tech oriented manufacturing and research uses, and replacement of obsolete buildings with well planned, high quality developments including landscaping, high architectural standards, underground utilities, adequate parlong and pedestrian improvements. 3. DESCRIBE HOW THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE USES AND REGULATIONS PRESCRIBED FOR THE ZONING DISTRICT IN WHICH IT IS LOCATED. The Development Agreement was found to be compatible, and currently remains compatible, with the uses and regulations prescribed for the zoning district in which it is located. Surrounding land use is general office, retail, light manufacturing, and "R & D ", with single - family residential use east of Aviation Boulevard. 4. DESCRIBE HOW THE PROPOSED PROJECT'S DESIGN WOULD BE COMPATIBLE AND INTEGRATED WITH, AND NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO, EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ON ADJACENT AND SURROUNDING NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. 2 The Development Agreement includes required development standards that assure that design will be compatible and integrated with, and not detrimental to, existing development on adjacent and surrounding neighboring properties. 5. SUBMIT A SCALED SITE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATION AND DIMENSINS OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPERTY, ABUTTING STREETS, UTILITIES, EASEMENTS, INGRESS AND EGRESS, PARKING AREAS, LOADING AREA, LANDSCAPING, ETC., ALONG WITH ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS, FLOOR PLANS, ETC., OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES. (SEE PLOT PLAN HECKLIST). Since this application requests extension of a previously approved Development Agreement, submittal of site plan and project drawings is not deemed applicable. 6. ATTACH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SHALL INCLUDE THE DURATION OF THE AGREEMENT, PERMITTED USES OF THE PROPERTY, DENSITY OR INTENSITY OF USE, MAXIMUM HEIGHT AND SIZE OF ALL BUILDINGS, AND PROVISIONS FOR RESERVATION OR DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES. The proposed Development Agreement is enclosed with this application as Exhibit 1 and is incorporated herein. Rev. 3/25/98 11:29 AM CAmydocADev Agee 97 -1 App 3 00 �U0 Procedures for filing application: 1. File completed application with the Planning Division along with completed Initial Study Applicant Questionnaire. Signature of the owner /owners, lessee (if applicant), and/or agent shall be required on all applications. 2. Provide all information, drawings and other materials as indicated on the Notice to Aooli _ante, 3. Pay filing fee. (See fee schedule). 4. Applicant and affected property owners will be notified of time of hearing. 5. Applicant should be present at the hearing and may offer additional evidence to support his/her request. 6. There shall be an additional fee for filing an appeal. Planning Staff: Date received "3-).HE E.A. 't I l Signature A9 4=&4Z D.A. 97- 1 4 Revised 11/25/97 pAplan- com\otheAdvpagrtnt\app 0 D iw' eriseq�unzlo Ci tu 0/ (-.. 0 t, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING SAFETY �i MAR 350 Main Street E —�' Q A 97 —Q1, El Segundo, CA. 90245 (310) 322 -4670 AMENDMENT TO FAX (310) 3224167 , APPLICATION FORJA DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Date: 3/9/98 The Applicant: Continental Development Corporation, 2041 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 200, El Segundo, CA Name Address 90245 (Applicant must have legal or equitable interest in the real property. Attach evidence.) (If not owner, a written statement from owners stating they are aware of this application.) Continental Development Corporation, 2041 Rosecrans Ave.,#200 310.640.1520 Owner's Name Address Phone Property Situated at: Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map No. 17158 (Exact legal description. If legal description is by metes and bounds, attach a copy.) General Locations: 2301 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue/ 810 -820 Douglas Street Address and Street, Avenue between Aviation Blvd. and Douglas St. Street, Avenue Existing Zoning- MU -S Existing General Plan/Specific Plan: Mixed Use -South REQUEST: Under the provisions of City Council Resolution No. 3268 and Government Code Sec. 65864- 65869.5, application for consideration of a Development Agreement for the above described property. Describe the proposed project in its entirety. Include information on the type of construction proposed, materials to be used, and type of uses involved (i.e., bank, general office, restaurant, etc.). Provide details on square footages, heights, number of stories, number of parking spaces etc. See Attachment "A ", Item 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference I` i 1 L5 U V LS ' ii J I 1 J MAR 1 21998 +._G DIVISIO,V �C "G62 2. Provide a detailed explanation of how the proposed project is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and programs specified in the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan. Specifically reference the applicable General Plan and Specific Plan sections. See Attachment "A ", Item 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. Describe how the proposed project is compatible with the uses and regulations prescribed for the zoning district in which it is located. See Attachment "A ", Item 3, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 4. Describe how the proposed projects' design would be compatible and integrated with, and not be detrimental to, existing development on adjacent and surrounding neighboring properties. See Attachment "A ", Item 4, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 5. Submit a scaled s?te plan showing the location and dimensions of all existing and proposed buildings, dimensions of the property, abutting streets, utilities, easements, ingress and egress, parking areas, loading area, landscaping, etc., along with elevations, sections, floor plans, etc., of all existing and proposed buildings and structures. (See Plot Plan Checklist) See Attachment "A ", Item 5, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 6. Attach the proposed Development Agreement. The Development Agreement shall include the duration of the agreement, permitted uses of the property, density or intensity of use, maximum height and size of all buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. See Attachment "A", Item 6, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2 0:- ", b OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT I,(We) Continental Development .Corporation the undersigned, depose and say that (I am/We are) the OWNER(S) of the property involved in this application and that I(we) have familiarized myself (ourselves) with the rules and regulation of the City of El Segundo with respect to preparing and filing this application and that the foregoing statements herein contained and the information on all documents and plans attached hereto are in all respects true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. inenta D l Cor Vlo� 19 errkik. �Wifders-,- Vice President � Planning 19 Signature Date AGENT AUTHORIZATION I hereby authorize Jerry A. Saunders to act for me in all matters relevant to this application. I understand that this person will be the exclusive contact on the project and will be s-ent all information and cort pondence. nentaI Dev_Maoomett£'tor Dora ti . Saunders, Vice President - Planning AGENT AFFIDAVIT I, the undersigned, depose and say that (I am/We are) the AGEN f the property involved in this application and that I(we) have familiarized myself (ourselves) with the and regulation of the City of El Segundo with respect to preparing and filing this application and th foregoing statements herein contained and the information on all documents and plans, attached h are in all respects true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Signature 19 Date Signature Date 19_ CITY OF EL SEGUNDO NEGATIVE DECLARATION EXTENSION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA -411 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DA 97 -2 APRIL 29, 1998 Prepared by: CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING SAFETY 350 MAIN STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 t;0`.)G 5 SECTION 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a request for a five (5) year extension to a previously approved Development Agreement (Instrument # 92- 1056312) for a six story, approximately 290,000 square foot office building and parking structure to be constructed at 2301 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue and a 182 -room all suites or full service hotel at 810 -820 South Douglas Street. The purpose of the extension is to allow additional time for the development of the Phase II office building and parking structure portion of the approved project. A 122 -room Summerfield Suites was constructed at 810 South Douglas Street to satisfy Phase I of the originally approved development. Phase II of the project includes a six -story 290,000 square foot office building with a maximum Floor- Area -Ratio of 1.0. The parking structure will be located northeast of the proposed office building and adjacent to an existing identical parking structure which serves an existing 196,000 square foot office building located at 2361 -2381 Rosecrans avenue. SECTION 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENT The project site is located in the Mixed -Use South (MU -S) Zone, which is consistent with the City's General Plan land use designation on the site of Urban Mixed -Use South. The project site is located within the southeast portion of the City of El Segundo, approximately one quarter -mile west of the San Diego (1 -405) Freeway and two miles south of the Glenn Anderson (1 -105) Freeway. The Metro Green Line and a station at Douglas Street are located adjacent to the north of the project site. Local jurisdictions near the site include the City of Los Angeles located north of Imperial Highway, the City of Manhattan Beach located south of Rosecrans Avenue, and the City of Hawthorne located east of Aviation Boulevard. The site is currently vacant except for landscaping and an existing recreation par course. The site is relatively level. The site is unpaved, contains no unique geologic features, and is a trapezoid shape. The surrounding areas to the west, north and east are developed with office uses, a health club, research and development, restaurants, and hotels. To the south across Rosecrans Avenue are retail uses. The properties to the north, west, and east are zoned Mixed -Use South (MU -S), and to the south is Planned Development (City of Manhattan Beach). There are no known endangered plant species associated with the project site and none that are known to be associated with the immediate project locale. Similarly, there are no known rare or endangered animal species associated with the project site or project locale and no known animal life is located on the project site. Further, there are no known cultural, historic, or scenic resources of recognized value located within the project site nor in the immediate vicinity. SECTION 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Reproduced as Appendix 1 is the City of El Segundo Initial Study and Checklist under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The purpose of the form is to identify and evaluate potential adverse environmental impacts. The checklist consists of background information, a checklist of environmental impacts, and a determination by the lead agency of the project's potential impacts on the environment and the type of CEQA document that will be prepared. A discussion of the items checked on the form is located in Section 4.0. 0!66 u SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1. LAND USE PLANNING The General Plan land use designation for the site is Urban Mixed -Use South. This designation allows offices at a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.3. The site is zoned MU -S (Mixed -Use South), which permits general offices, financial institutions, hotels, restaurants, research and development uses, and motion picture /television production facilities. When the project was originally approved in 1990, the property was zoned Heavy Industrial (M -2) and designated Commercial Manufacturing (C -M) in the General Plan Land Use Element. A Precise Plan (PP 89 -2) was approved in 1990 to enable the project to be constructed in the M -2 zone which did not allow offices and hotels as permitted uses. The proposed FAR of 1.0 would be less than current standard of the MU -S Zone (1.3) but is equal to the 1.0 FAR standard for the M -2 Zone in effect at the time of approval of the original precise plan (1990) and Development Agreement (1992). No change in the proposed density is proposed as part of this project extension. Section 8.1 of the Development Agreement permits the applicant to apply for a five (5) year extension of the Development Agreement subject to the discretionary review by the Planning Commission and City Council. As previously discussed, the land uses surrounding the project site consist of office, research and development uses, a health club, retaurants, and hotels. The project is not expected to produce significant impacts in the pattern or scale of existing development on the project site or in the general area of the project. Additionally, there are no agricultural land uses within the project vicinity that could be impacted. 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING In 1997, the City of El Segundo had a permanent population of approximately 16,250 and a daytime population of approximately 56,000. This resident to employee ratio has contributed to a relatively high demand for housing within the City. In 1995, a total of approximately 7,325 dwelling units existed in El Segundo. All residences in the City are located west of Sepulveda Boulevard, while non - residential uses are located predominantly to the east. The project site is not within the residential area, and is surrounded by commercial and industrial uses. The proposed extension of the Development Agreement for the proposed project would not alter the expected distribution of population. Additionally, the proposed project does not propose the development or demolition of any residential land uses, and would not directly generate permanent population growth in the City. The proposed project will bring new employment to the area, will increase the City's daytime population, and potentially generate new permanent population from employees relocating near the site. The number of employees will be consistent with the employee level described and analyzed in the original EIR. No significant impact was identified in the EIR, nor is any significant impact anticipated now. 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS The proposed extension of the Development Agreement will not alter the project impacts as analyzed in the previous EIR's related to geologic problems. The project site consists of 6.75 acres of unimproved land. The site is essentially level, thus the potential for landslides and mudslides is non - existent The project development would require minimal grading, thereby resulting in minimal 2 changes in topography. Exposure of soils to additional erosion factors would also not be expected. The issuance of a grading permit as a standard condition of approval will ensure slope stability and any erosion will be controlled during construction. There are no unique geological or physical features on the project site. Therefore, the project will not impact unique features. The project will not increase or change deposition/erosion either off- or on -site; and the project will not modify any body of water as a result of erosion or deposition. Compliance with local storm water and urban runoff regulations will also be required. The site is located within the seismically active Southern California region; therefore, site occupants would be subject to similar seismic risks as other commercial developments of a comparable size which are located in the vicinity of the project. However, no known geologic features exist on the site, and no known active or potential active faults are located on or near the proposed site. Therefore, the risk of surface rupture due to faulting is considered remote, as is the potential for ground failure or other seismic hazards. In addition, development on the project site would comply with all applicable City building guidelines, restrictions, and permit requirements as contained in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and the El Segundo Municipal Code. Development of the proposed project would, therefore, have a less than significant impact on topography and soils, and would not expose people or property to significant geologic hazards. No mitigation is required for the proposed extension. 4. WATER The proposed extension of the Development Agreement will not alter the project impacts as analyzed in the previous EIR's related to water. The project site is located on 6.75 acres of unimproved land and is essentially level. There is no paving or asphalt on the property to impede percolation of on -site water into the groundwater table. On -site surface water run -off is influenced by the existing topography of the project site. No water conveyance structures (e.g., culverts), which are designed to convey on -site surface water flows to off -site facilities, are currently located on -site. Surface flows which are not absorbed on -site within the property drain off -site into adjacent surface streets and eventually to storm drains which drain into the Pacific Ocean. The project site is located within an urbanized environment, and is not near any surface water bodies or within a flood plain designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency or in any area subject to flooding. Development of the parcel would introduce urban contaminants (i.e., tire wear residue, oil and grease, fertilizers, etc.) to the site which are not currently present. However, these are not expected to be in sufficient quantities to degrade on -site surface water run -off or groundwater quality. Existing absorption rates and drainage patterns would change, as proposed improvements (i.e., building, surface parking lot, etc.) would increase the amount of pervious surfaces presently located on -site. Proposed landscaped areas would permit some surface water absorption. Given the increase in imperviousness, drainage volumes would decrease, and surface water run -off generated by the project site would continue to be collected by storm drains located along Douglas Street and Rosecrans Avenue and directed via culverts to the Pacific Ocean. Site run -off and absorption rates will be calculated and analyzed by a licensed civil engineer, who will develop a design to facilitate drainage via the existing storm sewer system currently serving the site. Any improvements will be required to be completed by the project applicant. The design of the site drainage system has not been finalized; however, an engineered drainage system of area inlets and catch basins should accommodate anticipated runoff requirements within the existing storm 3 iiO;1bS sewer system. The project will be required to comply with the City's Storm Water and Urban Run -off Pollution Prevention Control Ordinance (No. 1235) and the Water Conserving Landscape Ordinance (No. 1194) and Resolution (No. 3806). A National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board may be required because the site is more than 5 acres in size. During construction, the displacement of earth could temporarily cause a change in drainage patterns. New patterns will be established once the project is completed. All drainage during and after construction will be required to drain into drainage facilities in accordance with plans and permits approved by the Department of Planning and Building Safety and the Public Works Department. Adjacent properties will be required to be protected from drainage and erosion in accordance with standard code requirements. Significant impacts to water availability are not anticipated by the project. While the proposed development would represent a continuation of the region's urbanizing trend, it would not result in significant impacts to ocean or groundwater quality, absorption rates, drainage patterns, surface run- off water, or the amount of available water. There are no new impacts anticipated or associated with the proposed extension and no mitigation beyond the standard permits is required. S. AIR QUALITY The proposed extension of the Development Agreement will not alter the project impacts as analyzed in the previous EIR's related to air quality. The proposed project (extension of a Development Agreement) does not include any land use, activity, or source that would produce any significant changes in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the vicinity, nor would it cause any significant alterations in the air movements, moisture or air temperature. The South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook thresholds (Table 6 -3) for significant impacts would not apply to this project because there is no change in the project which would increase the emissions above the levels reviewed and certified in the previous EIR's. Therefore, there will be no impact and no mitigation will be required for the operation of the facilities that was not a part of the previous EIR's. 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION The EIR's for the original project contain analysis of the anticipated traffic impacts of the proposed project. There are no changes to the project as part of the Development Agreement extension that would lead to changes in the trip generation or circulation that was analyzed in the previous EIR's. The previously certified Addendum to the Addendum to the Subsequent EIR, prepared in 1990 included traffic counts for the intersections in the project vicinity. This EIR projected a total of 4,590 trips per day would be generated by Phases I and II of the development. In order to evaluate if the environmental setting has significantly changed since the Development Agreement for the project was approved, the 1990 intersection analysis has been compared to more recent traffic counts conducted in 1994 and 1997 for different projects. The 1990 counts all use the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology, but 1994 and 1997 counts use the Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) methodology. The table below is a comparison of the 1990 to 1994 and 1997 existing traffic. 4 I:;0�)G9 COMPARISON OF 1990 TRAFFIC IMPACTS TO 1994 AND 1997 TRAFFIC 1990 Existing Roadways AM Peak PM Peak V/C V/C 1994 and 1997 Existing Roadways AM Peak PM Peak V/C V/C Intersection BffiLQ U& Bak LM Bag M$ BmiQ = Rosecrans Blvd. /Aviation Blvd. ' 1.16 F 1.10 F 1.16 F 1.15 F Rosecrans Blvd./Douglas Blvd.' 0.71 C 0.83 D 0.46 A 0.65 B Rosecrans Blvd./Nash St.' N.A. N.A. 0.57 A 0.42 A 0.47 A Rosecrans Blvd./Sepulveda Blvd.' 1.17 F 1.44 F 1.38 F 1.32 F Aviation Blvd./Marine Ave.' N.A. N.A. 0.80 C 1.01 F 1.01 F Aviation Blvd./El Segundo Blvd. 0.87 D 1.00 E 0.85 D 0.92 E Douglas St./EI Segundo Blvd. 1.05 E 1.19 F 0.58 A 0.61 B ' Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) methodology. Source - Traffic Impact Study for Continental Park Retail/Theater (EA -350). 1994. 2 Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) methodology. Source - Traffic Impact Study for Grand Avenue Corporate Center Project (EA -430). 1997. The table demonstrates that congestion at three of the study intersections has improved since 1990 and congestion has worsened at four of the intersections. Increased congestion at the four intersections was anticipated in the original EIR in 1990 as regional growth would contribute to traffic as well as other known project at the time. Several roadway improvements which have been implemented since 1990 have contributed to the decreased congestion at three intersections. The 1 -105 freeway and Metro Green Line have been completed, and Douglas Street and Nash Street, north of El Segundo Boulevard have been converted to a one -way couplet. These improvements, have improved traffic flows around the project area. Based the these factors, as well as other planned roadway improvements, contemplated in the original EIR, which will soon be implemented (Aviation and Sepulveda Boulevard Widening), the environmental setting has not significantly changed since the original Development Agreement was approved in 1990. Therefore, the proposed five year extension will not have any significant impacts on traffic or circulation that were not adequately addressed in the previous EIR's. The project will not be subject to the City's Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program adopted on May 21, 1996 (Resolution No. 3969), because the original Development Agreement was approved prior to the adoption of the City's Program. 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES There are no known rare, unique or endangered plant or animal species associated with the project site or within the immediate vicinity. The office building site is primarily covered with landscaping and weedy vegetation, as originally stated in the EIR's. Development of the proposed project would 5 `v0.�70 include additional landscaping consisting of plant species which readily adapt to urban environments and drought tolerant plant species as required by City regulations. Therefore, the proposed development extension will not produce significant changes to the number of rare or endangered plant species in the project area (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and micro flora). The project site and immediate locale are not known to contain any rare or endangered animal species. Since the project site is located within a highly developed urban area, the potential for animal life on -site is very limited and may only include species that have adapted to such environments. Development of the proposed project would represent a continuation of a regional urbanizing trend which has permanently altered wildlife habitat in the area. Given the very limited animal life on -site, the proposed project would not produce significant impacts to the number of rare or endangered species or specimens in the project area, nor would result in significant changes in the diversity of species, reduction in numbers, or deterioration of valuable animal habitats. The previous EIR's concluded there were no significant impacts biological resources. This conclusion has not changed. Therefore, no mitigation is required. 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES The proposed extension to the Development Agreement will not alter the project impacts as analyzed in the previous EIR's with respect to the consumption of renewable and non - renewable natural resources in the form of building materials during construction, and water and fossil fuels during project operation. The project site is currently undeveloped, thus development on the site would result in a increase in the consumption of natural resources including fossil fuels in the form of electricity and natural gas; however, consumption is expected to be marginal and would be considered insignificant relative to cumulative consumption volumes throughout the City of El Segundo and the airport area as a whole. The proposed office building project would be expected to consume natural resources at relatively low rates, and impacts to energy and mineral resources would therefore be considered insignificant. It is anticipated that existing supplies and infrastructure are adequate to meet the potential additional demands for water and wastewater facilities. In addition, the proposed project would comply with all applicable statutes and regulations set forth in the Uniform Building Code, and all applicable State resource conservation measures. Southern California Edison Company and the Gas Company are the suppliers of electricity and natural gas to the project site. Existing fuel supplies and infrastructure should be adequate to meet the project's needs. The proposed project would comply with all applicable statues and regulations set forth by the respective energy companies, in addition to all applicable State energy conservation measures. Therefore, the proposed project is not expected to result in significant increases in fossil fuel consumption or to produce any significant impacts upon the use, extraction or conservation of any natural resources, and no mitigation is required. 9. HAZARDS The proposed extension of the Development Agreement will not alter the project impacts as analyzed in the previous EIR's related to hazards. The proposed project would utilize common cleaning solutions, disposed of in accordance with applicable statutes. Although the use of these materials would be considered an increase over existing circumstances since the site is currently vacant, the amount to be used represents a marginal increase and is considered insignificant when compared to the total use of hazardous materials in the City and airport area as a whole. Based on the amount of hazardous materials stored, the nature of the packaging, the materials involved, and the project's compliance with A applicable regulations, the risk from the project is considered minor. Use and storage of explosives is not expected with the construction or operation of the proposed project. Based on the foregoing, the proposed project will have a less than significant impact regarding the use, disposal, or release of potentially hazardous materials, and no mitigation is required. Currently, the project site is accessible to emergency vehicles via Rosecrans Avenue, Douglas Street and a private driveway on the north and east side of the property. Based on project generated traffic volumes detailed in the original Traffic Impact Study, no unmitigatable traffic impacts are foreseen with development of the proposed project, and evacuation plans and procedures would be incorporated into building design. Therefore, the project is not expected to interfere with emergency response or evacuation plans and no mitigation is required beyond that included in the previous EIR's. The project site is located within the seismically active Southern California region; therefore, the occupants of the site would be exposed to seismic risks which are similar to those of occupants of other structures of comparable size and scale in the surrounding area. No active or potentially active faults are found on or near the project site and therefore potential hazards from ground failure, surface rupture, and other seismic hazards are considered less than significant. 10. NOISE The proposed extension to the Development Agreement will not alter the project impacts as analyzed in the previous EIR's with respect to Noise. There are no residential uses or other land uses which would be considered sensitive to noise and vibrations within the vicinity of the project. The nearest residential uses are approximately one - quarter mile to the east. Noise and vibration effects on the surrounding land uses are analyzed for both short-term construction activities and long -term operation of the proposed project. Construction activities will be mid -term in nature (approximately 12 to 14 months in duration) and will occur during permitted hours only, as required by City regulations which restrict construction to 7 am to 6 pm Monday - Saturday. In addition, vibration attributable to construction activities will be minimal due to the type of construction equipment generally employed for a project of this nature. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES The proposed extension to the Development Agreement will not alter the project impacts as analyzed in the previous EIR's related to the demands for municipal services. Police and fire services to the project site are provided by the City of El Segundo Police and Fire Departments. Water and park services are also operated by the City of El Segundo. Sewer demands for the proposed project will be accommodated by the County Sanitation District sewer lines and will be treated at the County Waste Treatment in the City of Carson. School services are provided by the El Segundo Unified School District. No impacts on public services are expected from the extension of the Development Agreement. 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS The site is currently improved and would not necessitate new utility connections. Existing utility infrastructure beneath Rosecrans Avenue and Douglas Street includes electricity, natural gas, telephone, cable television, water, sewer, and storm drain lines. Utility services would be provided by the appropriate purveyors, including: Southern California Edison Company, The Gas Company, Pacific Bell, Paragon Cable, and the City of El Segundo Water Division. The impacts of the project on utility systems was analyzed in the previous EIR's. There is no change in the design of the 7 OOJ7� project as part of the extension request which would alter the impacts originally analyzed and mitigated. The proposed development would submit all registration forms required for service connection, and would adhere to all applicable utility permit guidelines and restrictions. Water utility service is provided by the City of El Segundo Water Department, which purchases water from the West Basin Municipal Water District ( WBMWD). WBMWD recently completed the largest water reclamation facility in the State, located in El Segundo. With this project, which initially will process 20 million gallons per day (MGD) and ultimately 70 MGD, water supplies are anticipated to be adequate. Therefore, development of the proposed project is not expected to generate the need for new utilities, nor would it cause significant alterations to existing utilities. 13. AESTHETICS The proposed extension to the Development Agreement will not alter the project impacts as analyzed in the previous EIR's related aesthetics. No change in the office size or materials for the office building is proposed. Thus there should be no significant adverse impacts, not already studied and mitigated in the previous EIR's. Therefore, no new mitigation is required. 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES The proposed extension to the Development Agreement will not alter the project impacts as analyzed in the previous EIR's related respect to cultural resources. The project site is currently undeveloped, thus no historic structures exist on -site. Similarly, there are no known prehistoric sites or objects associated with the property or located within the immediate vicinity. The surrounding area is a fully urbanized and developed environment. No cultural, religious, or sacred uses or activities of importance to any particular segment of the general population are known to be associated with the project site or locale. The potential for significant impacts to historic or prehistoric sites, cultural, paleontological, archeological, historical or religious structures, or objects is considered remote. Further archaeological studies are not necessary, and preservation efforts are not required as a part of project implementation. Proposed development would not be expected to produce significant impacts upon, or result in the alteration or destruction of, any historic or prehistoric site, building, structure, or object, nor would they result in physical changes which would affect ethnic cultural values or restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the vicinity. No further mitigation is required. 15. RECREATION The proposed extension to the Development Agreement will not after the project impacts as analyzed in the previous EIR's related to recreational facilities and opportunities. There are no public parks or recreational facilities located within the immediate project vicinity. The Spectrum Club, a private fitness center is located on the west side of Douglas Street adjacent to the project site. The nearest park to the project site is Marine Avenue Park located approximately 0.5 miles to the south of Rosecrans Avenue on Marine Avenue in the City of Manhattan Beach. The office building site does currently contain an exercise par course. However, this facility was not required by the City. It was intended to be a temporary amenity by the developer until the proposed office building was constructed. Demands on parks and recreational facilities are primarily generated by permanent residential populations; and the proposed project is not expected to significantly alter the existing residential population. No residential development is proposed and the proposed land uses would attract a patron and local employee population that is not expected to create a significant impact 8 GO- 0 "17 J upon recreational facilities. However, it is expected that employee populations in El Segundo may generate a limited demand for parks and recreational facilities during peak afternoon hours. The original project approval included a requirement that a Recreational Plan be developed to accommodate the expected recreational needs of the employees. Therefore, significant impacts upon the quantity or quality of recreational opportunities are not expected as a result of the proposed extension to the project, and no additional mitigation is required. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE The proposed project is an extension to a previously analyzed project on an undeveloped site located in an urban setting. Therefore, the project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment and will not achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long -term environmental goals. There are no foreseeable negative cumulative impacts associated with the proposed five year extension that will have an adverse affect on human beings. SECTION 5.0 SOURCES N-•• /• 11 • 1- ;••-/• 11 Z-311771:716-pr: • _I / •111 =/ - 11•: O-••1 •/ 1:1 . Final 3. I • 1 11 = 1 - l Impac Report Continental for \ Initiated Zone Change Northwest Corner of • • las Street at Rosecrans Ayflnue l 85091815), • : • Associates, ��1 �•• -/• 1! • 11" 1I •111 =! - 11• -y i'••1 • •1 1 -1 _ -1= - :1 :1• - : ��:• :1• • 1: • :• :I 11 •111 =1 - 11•:y ••1 • 111. :• MWVM •: • • • ••: 5. Environmental Impact Report Continental Park Phase V, Jim Hinzdel and Associates, August 1986. 6. Traffic Impact Study for Retail/Theater Proiect, Lindscott, Law & Greenspan, April 1995. 7. Traffic Impact Study for Grand Avenue Corporate Center Project, Crain & Associates, April 1998. 0 P V ropmW 111 TEA411.ISR L.0 '17 1, c DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 350 Main Street AND BUILDING SAFETY El Segundo, CA 90245 (310) 3224670 FAX (310) 322 -4167 Project # -EA -411. DA 97 -2 BACKGROUND 1. Project Title: Extension to Development Agreement 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Cily of El Segundo, 350 Main Street. El Segundo, CA 90245 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Paul Garrv. Assistant Planner (310) 322 -4670 Ext. 399 4. Project Location: 2301 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue, 810 -820 S. Douglas Street S. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Continental Development Coroorabon 6. General Plan Designation: Urban Mixed -Use North 7. Zoning: Mixed -Use North (MU -N) 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary The proposed project is a request for a five (5) year extension of a previously approved Development Agreement for a six story, 290,000 square foot office building and a 182 -room residence inn with kitchen facilities or a full service hotel. The original Development Agreement was approved in 1992 for a period of five (5) years. A 122 room Summerfield Suites hotel was constructed under the authority of the original Development Agreement, but the office building has not yet begun construction. The extension will afford the applicant additional time to build the office building. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings) The surrounding property consists of office, retail, restaurant, and other commercial uses in an urban setting to the north, south, east, and west. 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.): None 1 ii0')•! J i II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, Involving at least one Impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning Population and Housing Geological Problems ._ Water Air Quality Transportation/Circulation III. DETERMINATION: Biological resources Energy and Mineral Resources Hazards Noise Mandatory Findings of Significance Public Service Utilities and Service Systems Aesthetics Cultural Resources Recreation On the basis of this Initial Study of Environmental Impact, the Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo finds the following: X That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures, as described on an attached sheet, have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the impact is "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to an earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Bret B. Directa of FAanningAnd Building Safety Secretary of the Planning Commission City of El Segundo Apri 1 7g, , 19S-_ 2 007 6 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all answers are required on attached sheets). i. 0 '1 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than ISSUES (and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. Land Use Planning. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or X zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or X policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the X vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. X impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an X established community (include a low- income or minority community)? 2. Population and Housing. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local X population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either X directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable X housing? 3. Geologic Problems. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? X b) Seismic ground shaking? X c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? X d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? X e) Landslides or mudflows? X f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil X conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? X h) Expansive soils? X 1) Unique geologic or physical features? X i. 0 '1 G0Ji8 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than ISSUES (and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4. Water. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, X or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related X hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration X of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any X water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction X of water movements? f) Change in the quality of ground waters, either X through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifier by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capacity? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? X h) Impacts to groundwater quality? X 1) Substantial reduction in the amount of X groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? 5. Air Quality. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to X an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? X C) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, X or cause any changes in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? X 6. Transportation/Circulation. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? X b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., X sharp curves or dangerous intersections or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to X nearby uses? G0Ji8 %0 ,) 9 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than ISSUES (and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? X e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or X bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting X alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts? X 7. Biological Resources. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their X habitats (including, but not limited to, plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage X trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., X oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and X vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? X 8. Energy and Mineral Resources. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation X plans? b) Use non - renewable resources in a wasteful and X inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known X mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? 9. Hazards. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of X hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency X response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential X health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of X potential health hazards? %0 ,) 9 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than ISSUES (and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable X brush, grass, or trees? 10. Noise. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? X b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 11. Public Services. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? X b) Police protection? X c) Schools? X d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X e) Other governmental services? X 12. Utilities and Service Systems. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X b) Communications systems? X c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution X facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? X e) Storm water drainage? X f) Solid waste disposal? X g) Local or regional water supplies? X 13. Aesthetics. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? X b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? X c) Create light or glare? X 14. Cultural Resources. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? X b) Disturb archaeological resources? X 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEOA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: 7 u0 .0 s i Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than ISSUES (and Supporting Information Significant Mitigation Significant No Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Affect historical resources? X d) Have the potential to cause a physical change X which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within X the potential impact area? 15. Recreation. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or X regional parks or other recreational facilities? a) Affect existing recreational opportunities? X 16. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade X the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve X short-term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are X individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in conjunction with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects X which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEOA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: 7 u0 .0 s i a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. On November 6, 1990, the City Council of the City of El Segundo adopted Resoluiton No. 3660 certifying an Addendum to the Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EA -206) covering the project as adequate and complete and adopting findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations as required by CEQA. The project consisted of a Precise Plan (PP89 -2), Lot Line Adjustment (SUB 90 -10), and Development Agreement to construct a 182 room hotel and 290,000 square foot office buildings on two parcels at 2301 -2381 Rosecrans Avenue and 810 -820 South Douglas Street. The project site is 9.69 acres. Three Environmental Impact Reports have been prepared for projects proposed on the site: 1) Final Environmental Impact Report for Continental Phase V (certified, August 1986); 2) Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City initiated Zone Change (SCH #85091815 - September, 1987) and 3) Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park Phase V (certified March, 1988). The Addendum to the Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report certified in 1990 was based on the three previous EIR's for the project. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The scope of the proposed project has not been increased by the proposed extension to the Development Agreement. Therefore, all the impacts in the checklist above were adequately addressed in the previously certified EIR's and Addendum EIR's. However, due to the fact that the most recent EIR was prepared eight years ago, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts has been prepared to address all potential impacts. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are 'Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,' describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. P:Vrcj9MW01 -425W&41 1W&411 JSC 8 82 J RESOLUTION NO. 3850 A RESOLUTION OF TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORINIA ADOPTING AND CERTIFYING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENMRONNIENrTAL UIPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSDIN'T EA -326 FOR A TRANSIENT OCCUPANCI' TAX CREDIT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND EL SEGUNDO SUMi mUIEi.D ASSOCIATES, L.P., CONCERNING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 810 -820 DOUGLAS STREET. THE CITE' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLO%VS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of El Segundo, California does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: 1. El Segundo Summcrfield associates, L.P. ( "Summcrfield ") is the owner in escrow of the property located at R 10 -920 Douglas Street, El Segundo, California; 2. The subject property is 3.04 acres in size and is Lot 2 of Parcel Map No. 171 5R, as modified with a Lot Line Adjustment and Certificate of Compliance; 3. The following environmental documents were previously prepared regarding development of the site: 1986 Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR), 1987 Subsequent EIR, I988 addendum to the EIR, 1988 Addendum to the Subsequent EIR, and the 1990 Addendum to the -addendum to the EIR, which evaluated all of the proposed project impacts. The project proposed under the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Credit Agreement is less intense than that reviewed by the EIRs and approved by City Council. The Environmental Impact Reports have been reviewed by Staff regarding any change of circumstances which may have developed since the time the EIRs were originally approved. Staff has performed updates concerning the fiscal impact analysis. Staff has determined based upon the Environmental Impact Reports, the updated fiscal impact analysie, and the initial study with regard to this TOT Credit agreement that so long as the Developer is required to comply with the mitigation measures recommended to the Ens ironmental Impact Reports, this TOT Credit agreement %% ill hay c no environmental impact beyond that evaluated in the pre\ ious Ell(s; -I. The project will reduce traffic and air quality impacts since the original project included it hotel with 117,980 sq. ft./ 182 rooms and the proposed project is 86,300 sq. ft./ 122 rooms; The proposed TOT Credit agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, and programs of the City; 6. On November !), 1993, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public meeting to consider the proposed Agreement and Negative Declaration of Ens ironmental Impacts for the Agreement, and the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2351 recommending to the City Council appro\al of the TOT Credit Agreement and certification of a Negative Declaration for the agreement; and, On December 7 and 11, 1993, the City Council held public hearings where opportunity %%as gn en to all persons to present testimony or documentary c�idence for or against Environmental assessment EA -326 for the Negative Declaration for the TOT Credit Agreement. SECTION 2. The Cite Council does hereby adopt and certify the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact with the proviso that the mitigation measures recommended in the Addendum to the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report prepared on the Project be complied with. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of December. 1993. Carl Jacobs Mayor City of El i;undo ATTESTED: 1 dy Mort ity Clerk (Seal) i APPROVED AS TO FORM: .p LelaAd C. Dolley City Attorney EA326cc.res City of El Segundo INTER- DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE HEARING DATE: November 6, 1990 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Kendra Morries, Director of Planning SUBJECT: EA -206: Addendum To The Addendum To The Environmental Impact Report For Continental Park Phase V. (Requires a Statement of Overriding Consideration.) SUB 90-10: Lot Line Adjustment of Parcel Map 17158. Specific Plan 89-2. Development Agreement. 2301.2381 Rosecrans Avenue /810 -820 Douglas Street. Applicant: Continental Development Corporation. The applicant is requesting approval of a mixed use commercial complex on a 9.69 acre site. Parcel 2 will be developed with either a 182 -suite residence inn with kitchen facilities or a full service hotel, with associated surface parking. Parcel 9 will be developed with a commercial building for commercial offices, R&D facilities, restaurants and retail sales and services, with an associated parking structure. The application also includes a request for a lot line adjustment (SUB 89 -10), and Precise Plan 89.2. The site is located at the northeast corner of Rosecrans Avenue and Douglas Street in the Heavy Manufacturing Zone (M -2) at 2301 -2381 Rosecsans Avenue /810.820 Douglas Street. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and adopt the attached draft Ordinance and Resolution that would. 1. Certify EA- 206, the Addendum to the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park Phase V. 2. Adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations for traffic /circulation and air quality impacts. 3. Approve Subdivision 89 -10 for lot line adjustment of Parcel Map No. 17158. 4. Approve Precise Plan No. 89 -2. 5. Approve the proposed Development Agreement, subject to the time frames proposed by the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: Subject hearing was continued from the meeting of October 16. As discussed by the City Council, staff has incorporated the following revisions and additional information: • Specific minimum parking requirements have been incorporated into the conditions of approval, as well as prohibitions on future reductions in the minimum number of parking spaces (Condition No. 48). • FAR references have been standardized. The use of drought tolerant planting materials has been made mandatory rather than nary, duusetiio l i 0 J 8 5 • Findings have been incorporated to allow for the use of kitchen facilities in the residence inn. • Where appropriate, required fees have been indexed to the Consumer Price Index • The conditions require that the hotel be developed first (Condition No. 61). • The conditions state that the rights granted by this approval may not be transferred from Continental Development Corporation to any other entity (Condition No. 63). • Charts have been incorporated that compare previous applications on this site to the current one, and that summarize the development proposed currently for all three parcels located on the site. In addition, the City Attorney has reviewed the tape of the August 23 Planning Commission proceedings and has determined that no violation of law occurred. The City Attorney notes that although the developers representative did participated at length in the Commission discussion portion of the meeting, his participation was with the permission of the Commission Chair. The City Attorney also notes that no member of the public was denied opportunity to participate in the hearing. The following chronology contains prior planning actions on this site: August 19, 1986 City Council adopts Resolution 3410 and Ordinance 1087 approving. Certification of EA -084, an Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park; Subdivision 86-6 to consolidate six (6) lots into three (3) lots; a General Plan Amendment redesignating the site from Heavy Manufacturing to Commercial Manufacturing; and Precise Plan 86-3 for 1.1 million square feet of commercial office space in buildings of four to seven stories with a floor area ratio of L72. February 24, 1987 Referendum election on February 24, 1987 overturns Precise Plan 8b-3 approval; General Plan Amendments upheld. May 26, 1987 City Council directive to staff and the Planning Commission to initiate Zone Change procedure to redesignate the site from M- 2 to C-M. September 10, 1987 Planning Commission adopts Resolution No. 2190: Recommending to City Council denial of EA -131 (Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park) and City initiated Zone Change No. 87.1 (redesignation from Heavy Manufacturing to Commercial Manufacturing). The recommendation for denial was based upon the finding that approval would have allowed 1.8 million square feet of commercial office space for subject rites. January 28, 1988 Planning Commission adopts Resolution No. 2198: Recommending to the City Council certification of EA -131 (Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park) and EA -139 (Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park Phase IV), denial of Precise Plan 87 -1 as proposed, and approval of Subdivision 87- 7/Tentative Parcel Map 17168. The Precise Plan is modified to allow for development of Lot 1 only for office and other commercial uses at a maximum FAR of LO (approximately 196,000 sq.tt.). March 1, 1988 City Council adopts Ordinance No. 1107: Certifying EA -131 (Subsequent Environmental ImReport for Continental Park) and EA -139 (Addendum to S ent Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park Phase IV), denial of Precise Flan 87.1 as proposed, and cepproval of Subdivision 87.7/Tentative Parcel Map 17168. The Precise Plan is modified to allow for development of Lot 1 only for office and other commercial uses at a maximum FAR of LO (approximately 196,000 sq-U The following chart summarizes and compares all development proposals that have been previously and currently submitted by Continental Development for this site: The following chart summarizes the ultimate development of all parcels on this site if subject applications are approved. iA d PARCEL. 9 4 IN TOTAL RA 70e (EA-139) CPA-205) rl n n TMAL r1 Vol n TWAL n n n TOTAL PAR 1.11 1.11 1.10 1.12 U M IA U — LO to 1s am p R 710,000 aem@@ bokm Llama INAN 100.0131 "x00 an,"I — 121,W 2"im 4loto" qi 000% a a D OY 663 — M Ir OY 1762 PA3X= REpC 1077 or INS am W An W I la — In en 1939 PRO P00110621) 1/700 It In tart no 7 naftwWw1 ORWORu 1/3100 7710 — IN W7 loss PRO Two 11.000 WI dew t" 1717 tow dew b11t 4600 WW 4W w" IGAU Wt w Wb ow 0700 not w As* tt" — PAIL= SIM IA 3 Ls 7.131 Ail I4.7 {i a" an Ill — iM 0.74 6110 The following chart summarizes the ultimate development of all parcels on this site if subject applications are approved. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Parcel 2 Parcel 2, located on 2.94 acres at the northwesterly corner of the site is proposed for development as a six -story, 182 suite residence inn with kitchen facilities or a full service hotel, with a total of 127,983 square feet. The building would have a FAR of 1.0. Parking would be provided by a 186 car surface parking lot that would surround the residence inn. The residence inn would include one and two bedroom suites, meeting rooms and a pool. No restaurants, cocktail lounges or convention facilities are incorporated. Parcel 3 Parc61 3, located on 6.76 acres at the northeast corner of Rosecrans Avenue and Douglas Street, is proposed for development with a 6 -story, 290,096 square foot, commercial office building. The building would have a FAR of L0. Approximately 6,000 square feet of the office building will be planned for ancillary retail and /or restaurant usage. Parking would be provided by a 6-story parking structure containing code required parking of a maalmum of 967 spaces. The parking structure will be located northeast of the commercial office building and adjacent to an identical parking structure that will serve the 196,000 square foot commercial building located on Parcel A previously approved in March, 1988 under EA- 139. 3 PARCEL 1 PARCEL. 9 PARCEL 3 TOTAL (EA-139) CPA-205) (EA -206) USE Off e Rowdenee Ills Of w — BLDG SIZE 03q. PL) 196,000 127.997 290,096 611,079 LOT SIZE (At.) t6 191 x76 11.1 PAR LO LO LO LO PAR13iG REQUIRED 663 162 967 1762 PARMNG PROP 05ED 651 Ilse 967 ism VEX TRIPS Gr_VT 2190 1690 6760 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Parcel 2 Parcel 2, located on 2.94 acres at the northwesterly corner of the site is proposed for development as a six -story, 182 suite residence inn with kitchen facilities or a full service hotel, with a total of 127,983 square feet. The building would have a FAR of 1.0. Parking would be provided by a 186 car surface parking lot that would surround the residence inn. The residence inn would include one and two bedroom suites, meeting rooms and a pool. No restaurants, cocktail lounges or convention facilities are incorporated. Parcel 3 Parc61 3, located on 6.76 acres at the northeast corner of Rosecrans Avenue and Douglas Street, is proposed for development with a 6 -story, 290,096 square foot, commercial office building. The building would have a FAR of L0. Approximately 6,000 square feet of the office building will be planned for ancillary retail and /or restaurant usage. Parking would be provided by a 6-story parking structure containing code required parking of a maalmum of 967 spaces. The parking structure will be located northeast of the commercial office building and adjacent to an identical parking structure that will serve the 196,000 square foot commercial building located on Parcel A previously approved in March, 1988 under EA- 139. 3 A. THE FOLLOWING CHART IS A SUMMARY OF REQUIRED AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE PROJECIt B. ON -SITE CIRCULATION AND PARMNG: Access to the site is proposed via a private loop driveway which extends from Rosecrans Avenue to Douglas Street. A second private driveway would provide access to the surface parking area for the residence inn. No on- street parking would be allowed on Rosecrans Ave. or Douglas St., nor along the interior driveway, consistent with the design of the rest of Continental Park. Parking for the residence inn would be provided by 186 surface spaces (180 standard, b handicapped), at a ratio of 1.02 per suite spaces in compliance with code requirements. (Code would require 162 spaces based on 1 space for each of the first 100 rooms plus 0.75 Woes for each of the next 100 rooms.) Parking for the office building would be provided in a six -story parking structure containing a minimum of 967 spaces in conformance with code requirements. (Code would require 967 spaces based on 1 space for every 300 square feet of floor area.) The parking structure is proposed east of the office building and adjacent to a parking structure that will be constructed for the proposed 196,000 square foot office building approved previously under Phases 1 of the project. The structures are partially screened by the buildings, and are located in reasonable proximity to the buildings they serve. The residence inn does incorporate a ports cochere area for guest drop o$ C. OFF -Sr= TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION: The EIR discusses in detail the traffic and circulation impacts. That information is incorporated into the Environmental Review Section of this staff report. General transportation /circulation impacts identified by staff are discussed below. 4 M-2 ZONE PROPOSED PRECISE PLAN Told Parcel 3 (Mee) Pareel 2 (Roteh LOT SIZE6 20,000 422,096 294,030 128,066 (aau) (9.69) (6.76) (294) FLOOR AREA 422000 418.070 290,096 127,993 (Sq Ft) FLOOR AREA RATIO LO LO LO LO PARKING SPACES 1/300 attics 1,129 967 162 REQUIRED 1 for eseb 100 rooms plus 0.75 for each of nat 100 rooms PARING SPACES — 1,162 967 165 PROPOSED USE Ofnce and Residence Ina O(Ilce and Residence Inn as subject to CUP. permitted uses. SETBACKS: Front 25 & Roseeraas Boulevard - 26-30 It N/A Side 15-20 t< Douglas Street - 25-56 R 16-23 ft. Raar 10.25 fL Santa Fe Railroad - 20 R 6 fL Interior - 35 IL 25 R HEIGHT 200 ft OMce buflding - 6 stories, 84 feet —&3d—um Residence Inn - 6 stories, 84 feet masimum Parting mum" - 6 stories, 84 feet Maimum • Prior to road dedication. •• Does not inciude coverage by internal roadway. B. ON -SITE CIRCULATION AND PARMNG: Access to the site is proposed via a private loop driveway which extends from Rosecrans Avenue to Douglas Street. A second private driveway would provide access to the surface parking area for the residence inn. No on- street parking would be allowed on Rosecrans Ave. or Douglas St., nor along the interior driveway, consistent with the design of the rest of Continental Park. Parking for the residence inn would be provided by 186 surface spaces (180 standard, b handicapped), at a ratio of 1.02 per suite spaces in compliance with code requirements. (Code would require 162 spaces based on 1 space for each of the first 100 rooms plus 0.75 Woes for each of the next 100 rooms.) Parking for the office building would be provided in a six -story parking structure containing a minimum of 967 spaces in conformance with code requirements. (Code would require 967 spaces based on 1 space for every 300 square feet of floor area.) The parking structure is proposed east of the office building and adjacent to a parking structure that will be constructed for the proposed 196,000 square foot office building approved previously under Phases 1 of the project. The structures are partially screened by the buildings, and are located in reasonable proximity to the buildings they serve. The residence inn does incorporate a ports cochere area for guest drop o$ C. OFF -Sr= TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION: The EIR discusses in detail the traffic and circulation impacts. That information is incorporated into the Environmental Review Section of this staff report. General transportation /circulation impacts identified by staff are discussed below. 4 1. Emergency Vehicle Response. Project impacts can be offset by requiring participation in the City's OPTICOM preemptive signalization program, and signal synchronization. Requiring that construction is in compliance with current building and fire codes, and security measures, along with the site's location close to the Hawthorne fire station (with mutual aid response), emergency service impacts will be reduced. Z. Light Rail Extension. The anticipated light rail transit line will parallel the sites northeast property line and a station is planned in the general vicinity of Douglas Street. Traffic impact assessment& assume construction of the light rail line. The proposed station is anticipated as a destination, rather than an origin for transit riders. Therefore, the need for additional parking significantly in excess of code requirements for the office use is not anticipated, given the proposed construction of a park -and -ride lot on the north side. D. SETBACKS: The development chart incorporated above indicates that the project will comply with the minimum setback and landscaping requirements of the underlying M -2 zone. A &foot landscaped buffer is proposed in the site interior adjacent to the open parking lot and the railroad right -of way. E. DENSITY AND FLOOR AREA RATIO: The applicant proposes a maximum 1.0 Floor Area Ratio for both buildings on the site in compliance with code and General Plan requirements. F. GENERAL PLAN: The site is designated Commercial Manufacturing on the Land Use Element of the General Plan. This designation is intended as a transition between commercial and industrial uses. The proposed land uses are consistent with the long term goal of the General Plan to replace heavy industrial uses and the associated negative impacts of these uses (e.g. noise, odors, exposure to hazardous materials) and the goal to replace them with high quality uses, particularly in the area southeast of Sepulveda and El Segundo Boulevards. The Circulation Element was previously amended for the site as part of Precise Plan 85- 3 to incorporate the potential redevelopment of the project site for office development into the assumptions regarding traffic impact and improvements necessary to maintain adequate levels of service. The extension of Douglas Street across the railroad tracks to provide and alternative north -south access was incorporated into the assumed planned regional traffic improvements to be constructed within the planning horizon of the General Plan. G. SURROUNDING ZONING AND LAND USE: The site is zoned Heavy Manufacturing (M -2), which is inconsistent with the current General Plan designation of Commercial Manufacturing. Surrounding zoning in the City of El Segundo is Commercial Manufacturing (C-M) to the east, north and northwest, which permits a mixture of commercial office and manufacturing uses. In the City of Manhattan Beach, zoning is M -2 immediately south of the project, and CPD (Commercial Planned Development) further west. Zoning in the City of Hawthorne is R -1 north of Rosecraiis, and M -1 and M -2 to the south The southeasterly portion of the site will be developed with a 196,000 square foot commercial office building and multi -level parking structure previously as part of Phase 1 for the site. Existing land use in the surrounding area is primarily y mixed general office, light manufacturing, and research and development The Holly Glen single- family residential area is located east of Aviation Boulevard and north of Rosecsans Ave. in the City of Hawthorne, and is physically and visually separated from the site by the elevated railroad tracks. Further wed along Rosecrans Ave.., there are and planned hotel and office structures at higher densities, including: Continental Par Plaza (FAR 08), (�0)89 Data General Complex (1.12), Raddison Hotel (1.36), and the Park Plaza office (1.34). Building heights are five to seven stories. The M -2 zone requires discretionary review for all urea other than heavy industrial. The M -2 zone does permit residence inns/hotel and office development, provided discetionary review is conducted to ensure that there are no incompatible effects with heavy industrial uses in the area. There are no heavy industrial usee in the area and, therefore, no potential for conflict H- GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY: The current General Plan designation of C-M is inconsistent with the current zoning designation of M -2. A number of procedures are available whereby the General Plan and Zoning for the site can be brought into consistency. 1. Change the zoning to C-M. This option was analyzed by EA -231 and Zone Change No. 87.1 and was found by the City to be unacceptable as it would result in a maximum potential of approximately 1.8 million square feet of floor area for this site, Continental Park Plaza Phase V. 2. Retain the existing M -2 zoning, with discretionary review of commercial manufacturing uses. Discretionary review could be provided by conditional use permit or precise plan procedures. The Precise Plan procedure was selected by the developer as a means to define permitted uses with maximum allowable floor area ratios of 1.0, establish a height limit of 84 feet, and establish setback, open space and circulation design standards. Since the precise plan functions as both a specific plan and zoning amendment for the property, it would comply with the legal mandate for consistency. As an alternative, the Conditional Use Permit procedure could be used to define the conditions under which a particular use would be allowable, but would not amend the underlying zoning. The application includes a request for a lot line adjustment of Parcel Map No. 17168. The applicant indicates the adjustment is necessary due to project financing and will result in the following sizes: Parcel 2 (residence inn/hote)) 2.94 acres Parcel S (office) 6.76 acres These parcel sizes assume no net reductions for road widening dedications and internal roadways. Parcel sizes and lot frontages will exceed the minimum M -2 standards of 20,000 sq.R and 100 feet respectively. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Three environmental impact reports have previously been prepared for this site: L EA -084: Final EIR for Continental Park Phase V for 1.1 million sq.ft. commercial office space, (Certified August 1986). 2. EA -13L• Subsequent EIR for City Initiated Zone Change No. 87 -1 from M -2 to C- M, which would allow an estimated L8 million sq.ft commercial office space (Certified September, 1987). 6 3. EA- 139: Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park Phase V and Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City initiated Zone Change No. 87•L (Certified March, 1988). In order to fully assess the environmental impacts of the proposed precise plan, EA -206, an Addendum to the Addendum to the last EIR (EA -139) was prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the state CEQA Guidelines. This section provides that an Addendum may be prepared when only minor technical changes are necessary to update the previous environmental documentation, and no new significant impacts are identified as a result of these changes. EA•206 focuses on circulation, traffic pedestrian safety, air quality impacts from mobile emissions and sanitary sewers. The EIR estimates that the project will generate a total of approximately 4,590 new vehicular trip ends per day, 2,295 trips inbound and 2,295 trips outbound. This represents a reduction of 1,112 trips from those anti in the previous EIR's that projected impacts based on the original proposals for arosls 1, 2 and 3. Of the 12 intersections analyzed in the current EIR, significant impacts would occur on the following five intersections without the Douglas Street extension. • Aviation Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue • Rosecrans Avenue and Douglas Street/Redondo Avenue • Rosecrans Avenue and Hindry Avenue • Aviation Boulevard and El Segundo Boulevard • Douglas Street and El Segundo Boulevard TA the extension of Douglas Street, the following four intersections would experience significant impacts: • Aviation Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue • Rosecrans Avenue and Do las Street/Redondo Avenue • Rosecrans Avenue and Hin► Avenue • Douglas Street and Utah Avenue The extension of Douglas Street is a mitigation measure recommended by the EIR as it would have a poaitive effect on the overall area circulation. The Douglas Street extension is a recommended improvement in the City's Circulation Element. That element of the General Plan also contains the following objectives (pg. 2- 5, 2-6}: 1. 'The City should continue orderly development of the transportation system based on: (1) adequate financial resources; (2) plans which are periodically updated to reflect changing conditions; (3) achievement of land use patterns which contribute to the functional well -being of the community and (4) construction of each addition (or extension) to the circulation system so that it will provide a usable link in the total system provided that such an addition (or extension) does not materially disrupt or' ct the current land use, unless the City Council finds that the eeneral public interest so requires.' 3. The threshold at which the cumulative traffic impact due to site specific development or intensification will 'trigger' a requirement by the City that a specific addition (or extension) be implemented must be decided by the City. Such a decision should be made in consultation with the relevant property owners /tenant.' The Douglas Street extension is also a substantial capital investment, particularly bemuse the improvement would have to be grade separated with cost estimates ranging from 3.6 million for an undercroesing (the most feasible design). Such an improvement is not likely to be funded solely by the City nor by mitigation fees from a single developer. While ultimate responsibility for construction of the improvement lies with the City of El Segundo, the project requires multi - agency approval and would provide a regional serving benefit The conditions of approval therefore, require that the developer pew an aweaament fee of $1.00 per square foot of floor area as a fair share contribution to road improvements. 7 Air quality impacts for the project will derive primarily from automobile emissions. The EIR indicates that as with the regional pollution burden, the air quality impacts associated .' with the project are potentially si gniscant because they will exacerbate man existing air pollution problem. All recommended mitigation measures, including dust control measures and the development of a Transportation Control Measures plan are incorporated into the conditions of approval for the project. The EIR concludes that traffic and air quality impacts cannot be reduced to an insignificant level. Under CEQA, the City has a duty to avoid or minimize environmental damage where feasible, and to balance competing environment, economic and social objectives in deciding to approve or disapprove a project with significant effects. The City may approve a project with adverse environmental effects, if it adopts a 'statement of overriding considerations' which defines the balancing of a project's benefits despite environmental impacts. In order to approve the project as proposed, the following actions would be needed to provide environmental clearance: 1. Impose all feasible Mitigation Measures; and 2. Adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse impacts regarding traffic /circulation and air quality. To approve the project as proposed, a Statement of Overriding Considerations will be required which specifically identifies other benefits achieved by the project which override the environmental concerns. Possible basis for such a statement is outlined below: a. The Environmental Impact Report Addendum to the Addendum identified significant impacts which are potentially significantly adverse, but can be mitigated by conditions imposed upon the project in the areas of traffic /circulation and air quality. b. The project as designed will have a significant effect on the local environment as increased traffic/circulation volumes will decrease the level of service at the surrounding nearby intersections and increase air emissions. All feasible mitigation measures as identified in the Environmental Impact Report have been incorporated into the project. Project traffic and related air quality impacts will not be mitigated to an insignificant level even with inclusion of the identified feasible mitigation measures. Incremental development on a lot by lot basis will also result in significant unmitigated traffic and air quality impacts. C. Unavoidable adverse impacts are outweighed by the project benefits which include fulfillment of long -term land use goals to replace and upgrade heavy industry and obsolete buildings; providing high quality planned developments with upgraded landscaping, underground utilities, open space, pedestrian plazas and quality design at a major entrance to the City in furtherance of land use and aesthetic goals; providing construction and long- term employment opportunities; contributing financially to improvement of the traffic circulation system; and contributing to a logical extension of the type of land use and development existing and planned in the project vicinity. d. The final EIR identified project alternatives which would reduce environmental effects; however, the City Council hereby finds that these are infeasible for economic, social and other considerations. The 'no project' alternative would not implement the long -term land use and aesthetic objectives of replacing heavy industry and obsolete buildings with clean, light, well planned development, and would result in lost construction and permanent employment opportunities. The 'development under existing zoning' alternative would result in increased heavy industrial development with impacts on stationary noise, air quality and aesthetics. This alternative would not achieve long -term objectives for replacing heavy industrial uses with clean, light, technically - oriented land uses and would not be consistent with surrounding development and planned land use. e. Two major capital projects could improve traffic circulation, but the City Council hereby finds implementation is not within the jurisdiction of the City of El Segundo. The light rail transit line planned adjacent to the site is the responability of the County Transportation Commission. Reconstruction of the Rosecrans /Aviation bridge will involve multi jurisdictional agreements and cooperation of the affect railroad ; L The Final EIR identifies the construction of a Douglas Street extension a mitigation measure for traffic circulation and air quality impects The City Council hereby finds that there are certain economic and other considerations which make infeasible a requirement that Douglas Street be constructed prior to issuance of building permits, however, the City Council has previously recommended that the City Council commit to the a extension of Douglas Street. Construction of the extension is anticipated to cost $M million and requires coordination of the City, the Public Utilities Commission, and the affected railroad. For this reason, construction will take several years to complete and time frames cannot be reasonable assured. These factors would make the project financing infeasible and would in effect constitute a project denial, if required prior to issuance of building permits. The project will, however, be required to contribute funding toward construction of the Douglas Street extension or other regional transportation improvement, and to implement trip reduction measures as part of a project transportation systems management plam All mitigation fees and recommendations received have been incorporated into the conditions of approval. The applicant has submitted a Fiscal Impact Report, dated May 1990 and prepared by Planning Consultants Research. The study is included in tonight's agenda package for your review. The study was prepared utilizing both the 'City of El Segundo Base Study' and the 'El Segundo Fiscal Impact Analysis Model Operations ManuaP. The report presumed that construction would begin immediately following city approvals, with occupancy commencing in early 1992. The project is expected to generate revenues in the following areas: property taxes, sales and use taxes, business license fees, franchise taxes, and transient occupancy taxes. In addition, the project will be required to pay the standard service mitigation fees for police, fire and library services. The study concludes that the cumulative surplus over the five -year study period will be approximately $2.1 million. Section 20.08.860 defines a 'Precise Plan': 'Precise Plan means amendment to the zoning map which is a part of this title, in which is included the detailed application of all of the applicable matters contained in this title, as well as other features essential to tho complete development but which may be defined and regulated by other legislative controls.' The function of the Precise Plan is to define in detail specific site development standards in order to implement the General Plan These include building height, bulk, setbacks, density, parking and landscaping. The Precise Plan may aLw define requirements and standards for recreation facilities, street& and sidewalks, parking, utilities and other facilities and improvements necessary to serve the project and implement the General Plan as applied to a particular project. Once adopted, the Precise Plan amends the underlying zoning. The proposed Precise Plan attempts to combine the development standards of the M -2 and GM zones. The project is within the allowable height and floor area ratio for the underlying M -2 zone, but proposes uses that would require discretionary review. The proposed hotel and office use is permitted under C-M zoning, however density is controlled by a 45 foot building height limit, and by open space requirements, rather than by FAR limits. Conceivable densities in excess of 2.0 FAR are feasible in C-M zones if below -grade parking is used The precise plan proposes an 84 foot height limit (six- stories) which is nearly double the 46 foot limit under C-M. Since the height is consistent with the design of surrounding properties, and enables the developer to provide generous landscaped open space on site, the proposed height appears to be appropriate. The Precise Plan also incorporates a request that kitchen facilities be permitted in conjunction with the residence inn suites, contrary to Section 20,08.246 of the Zoning Code - which currently excludes kitchen facilities from hotels. The basis for the request is that the residence inn concept caters primarily to business travelers who are desirous of a more 'residential' environment than the normal hotel The Precise Plan as proposed is prepared as an amendment to the zoning code, accompanied by a conceptual set of plans. In order to maintain maximum flexibility for future market conditions the applicant has not provided detailed site, elevation, floor and landscape plans typically required and requested for project review. While the staff has verified that the proposed floor area and parking can be built within the height, setback and open space standards proposed, the level of detail is insufficient to allow adequate review of specific site design, as shown on the accompanying plans submitted with the project application. With a project of thin magnitude, it is not unusual that all phases of a master plan are not fully designed To allow the developer the flexibility to design the subsequent phases at a later date and yet still provide the City with a mechanism to review the details of the site design prior to building permit application places an administrative responsibility on staff for project review after precise plan approval. This responsibility is not one typically associated with precise plans. 7`be Planning Commission therefore. recommends The proposed Precise Plan includes facilities and standards which can be found to implement the following General Plan objectives: a. Proposed residence inn/hotel and office land uses are more desirable than heavy manufacturing uses permitted by the underlying M -2 zone and are consistent with land use objectives of the General Plan. b. Building and site design includes high quality architecture, extensive landscaping, underground utilities, open space and pedestrian plazas and paths, consistent with objectives for high- quality design. C. Building height is limited to 84 feet (six stories maximum), which conforms to the prevailing height of recent development along Rosecrans Avenue. d Building bulk is controlled by the proposed open space and landscaped areas. The site plan also loa,tes the parking structure where it will be partially screened from view of public streets by the office buildings, thereby reducing visual bulkiness of the structure. e. Building density will be limited using a maximum aggregate floor area -to -site ratio (FAR) of 1.0. A Development Agreement is proposed as part of the application to vest the right to construct the intended land use and intensity. Vesting a right to construct means a developer has a guaranteed right for a specified period of time to build an approved project, regardless of subsequent planning, zoning or land use decisions in the City that might otherwise have affected her/his property. Because the terms, conditions, phasing schedule and fiscal commitments are essential elements of a Development Agreement, and are also subject to public hearing, consideration of this application is appropriate in conjunction with the Precise Plan, Subdivision, and Environmental Assessment. The Development Agreement proposed by the applicant is for a 7 -year term. The developer would be required to apply for building permits for both Parcels 2 and 9 prior to the 7-year expiration. In addition, the developer has proposed that the term shall be 10 Go0o automatically extended for an additional three (3) year period if any of the following public infrastructure improvements have not been completed prior to the end of the 7 -year period 1. Sepulveda Boulevard tunnel widening under runways at LAX; 2. The extension of Douglas Street across the Santa Fe right -of -way between Alaska and Park Place; 3. Opening and full operation through the City of El Segundo of the LACTC Light Rail Green Line; 4. Construction of the Santa Fe Heavy Rail Bridge across the Rosecrans and Aviation intersection. 5. Completion of the proposed Century Freeway (1-105); and 6. Completion of the Douglas Street and Nash Street one -way couplet from Imperial Highway to El Segundo Boulevard. The Planning Commission is recommending that the initial term be limited to b years. They also recommend that the mandatory public improvement provisions be deleted, and that the applicant be eligible for a 5-year time extension subject to approval by the Planning Commission. That the City Council concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and adopt the attached draft Ordinance and Resolution that would: L Certify EA -206, the Addendum to the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park Phase V. 2. Adopt of a Statement of Overriding Considerations for traffic /circulation and air quality impacts. S. Approve Subdivision 89 -10 for lot line adjustment of Parcel Map No. 17158. 4. Approve Precise Plan No. 89-2. S. Approve the proposed Development Agreement, subject to the time frames proposed by the Planning Commission. R 5. 11.Wnb Kendfa S. Morn Director of Planning REVIEWED AND APPROVED: Ronald E. Cano City Manager EIHEB1TS A. Draft Ordinance - Director of Planning B. Draft Resolution - Director of Planning C. Original Draft Ordinance - Director of Planning D. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2291 E. Interdepartmental Comments F. Fiscal Impact Analysis - PCR May 1990 (Applicants submittal) G. Development Agreement (Proposed by applicant) R Application L Plan sw>es M .iti 19J 11 Exhibit D ORDINANCE NO. -- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCM OF THE CTTY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIMRNIA. APPROVING PRECISE PLAN eat, FOR A hUD USE PROJECT AT 2301.2381 ROSECRANS AVENUE /610- 820 DOUGLAS STREET. WHEREAS. on September 27, 1989 an application was received from Continental Development Corporation for EA -208, Sub 90.10, Procin Plan 89-2, and a Development Agreement to allow a 6- story office buildins and associated parking structure. and a 6-story, 182 room residence inn with kitchen facilities or a Hill- service hotel. for property at 2301 -2381 Rosoc ans Avenue/ 810.820 Douglas Street; and WHEREAS. a Notice of Preparation was Sled on February 6. 1990 for preparation of the Environmental Impact Report and duly circulated and noticed as required by law-, and WHEREAS. the Environmental Impact Report identified significant adverse cumulative traffic /circulation and air quality impacts which cannot be mitigated to an insignificant level by conditions imposed on the project; and WHEREAS. on August 23 and September 13. 1990 the Planning Commission did hold. pursuant to law, duly-advertised public hearings on such matter, and notice of hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law; and WHEREAS, on September 18. 1990 the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2291 recommending to the City Council certification of EA -206 an Environmental Impact Report and adoption of a statement of overriding considerations. approval of Proem Plan No. 89-2. approval of Subdivision No. 90- 10/I4t Line Adjustment for Parcel Map No. 17158, and approval of a Development Agreement; and WHEREAS. on October 2 , October le, and November 6. 1990 the City Council did hold. pursuant to law, duly - advertised public hearmp on such matter, and notice of hearing was given in the time. form and manner proscribed by law; and WHEREAS. a final Environmental Impact Report (EA -206) has been prepared and the City Council has considered and certified the final EIR and incorporated statements of overriding consideration by adoption of Resolution No. 1127 : and WHEREAS, opportunity was given to all persons to present testimony or documentary evidence for or spinet EA -206, Proem Plan 80.2. Sub 90.10 and the Development Agreement: and WHEREAS, at said hearing the following facts and Sndinp were established L The project cite consists of 9.69 acres that are proposed for subdivision into lots of 6.75 aces and 2.94 acres. 2. The cdating M -2 soniag for the site is inconsistent with the otwdng General Plan Lend Use designation of the site for Commercial Manufacturing uses. and a Proem Plea application is one of several procedures available whereby consistency between the zoning and General Plan can be achieved. 3. The City council previously adopted Ordinance No. 1107 on March L 1986 denying Precse Plan 87.1 as iasu>scient detail for the development on Lots 2 and 3 was provided: and approvittg the proposed subdivision and precise plan for the development of Lot 1 with commercial office space at a --mum FAR of L0, after dedications not to exceed 196.000 sq. ft_ 4. Surrounding zoning and General Plan lend use Assignation in the City of M Segundo a C -M. ComnwreW Manufacturing, In the City of Manhattan Beach, zoning is M -2 and CPD (Commercial Planned Development). Zoaiag in the City of Hawthorne is R -1 north of Roseaans Avenue. and M -1 and M -2 to the south. Surrounding land use is general ounce. light manufactur. 0 and 1Uk1r, with single - family residential use east of Aviation Boulevard L A long -term goal of the adopted General Plan Land Use Element is the replacement of heavy industry which has detrimental noise, odor and aesthetic effects with clean. quiet. hightech oriented manufacturing and research uses, and replacement of obsolete building with well- planned. ndergroundd ud�ities, adequate parking pedestrian impr o architectural standards 92- 1056312 6. The fiscal impact analysis prepared for the project indicates that the project %111 generate annual municipal revenues of approsnmately $766.726.60. 7. The proposed Development Agreement will be for an initial 6 year period. The apphant may apply for one additional 6 year *=tension w*ea to discretionary review and approval by the Planning Commission and /or City Council S. The proposed Precise Plan, land uses, design standards and improvements are consistent wn the existing General Play Lad Use designation of Commercial Manufacturing and with long. term General Plan objectiv" for replacing heavy industry with clean. gwet, well - planned high quality development 9. The Precise Plan establishes development standards for the site including permitted uses. building height. floor area ratio. lot coverage. open space, setbacks, that are connawnt wrath the General Plan designation for the site. 10. The project will have building heights of 84 foot maximum. parking is conformance with code requirement& and a maximum floor arse ratio of L0, after dedicsnons. 1L The Precise Plan as proposed provides suMdow detail to determine that the proposed development will implement the General Plan through standards for high -quality architecture. sisensive landscaping, underground utilitie& open span, pedestr= pleas and paths, and atreet circulation systems consistent with objectives for high - quality donga The Precise Plan will limit ding height to 84 feet, which conforms to prevailing heights of similar projects us the area, The 13redse Plan will control building bulk through establish=*= of a 1.0 floor area ratio, required landscaped setbacks and open spew standards. 12. The Precise Plan includes improvements for water, sewer, drainage. solid waste disposal energy conserntion. streets, public transit and pedestrian, facilities necessary to support the land uses and density proposed for the site. 13. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development The sits is level and a not located is as area of unstable topography, flood hazards. or fault rupture study zone. The parala created by the proposed subdrr m have adequate aontags on public streets, and exceed the minimum parcel sin established for the underlying M -2 zone. 14. With the prevision of reciprocal access easements. the proposed Precise Plan will provide adequate acw through and use of the subdivision. - 16. The design of the Precise Plan and improvements are not likely to cause serious public hen problems. The pm)ed is required to be amneeted to the County Sanitation District sezutary sewer sym m said will be directed to the District's Carson sewage treatment pleat, which has sualdent capacity to eerve the project, waste water flow. 16. That artsis changes or alterations are required in the project to completely or partially mitigate significant onvirenmenW impetts idealised in the Final EIR and that adoption of stauments of overriding cossideratios with regard to unavoidable traffic /circulation and air quality impacts are necessary due to economic. social sad other considerations which make infeasible certain mitigation meseures and the pzgod alternatives identified in the Final EIIi se enumerated in Resolution Nn, i,i c-7 . 17. That a waiver is appropriate from Ssctioa 20.08.246 of the Zoning Cod@ to allow for kitchen fadHbn in the Rasadence Inn suite@ due to the unique nature of the operation which caters to busiaa@s travelers who desire amenities similar to those found in a residential setting. SECTION i The City Council hereby approves Precise Plan 89.2 subpd to the following conditions and mitigation meesu:sr L Prise to issuaaos of each Cestiscate of Occupancy, appliant shall psy to the City of El Segundo a one-time tsafse improvamaat fee in the amount of iL00 par square foot of that building's gross floor area The purpose of the traffic imprvvsm@nt fee is to fond traffic system improvements to mitigate the adverse impacts on traffic circulation attributable to the project Fees shall be used for the construction of capital improvements within a one -mile radius of the pmject site, as identified in the General Plan. Capital Improvemant Program or other local and /or regional treagwrtatim improvement plan, ae determined by the City Council This fee shall be adjusted annually, beginning January IM to reflect the Consumer Price Index @d by the United Stated Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Los Angles Basin /Long published Statistical Ares. 92- 1056312 t� c' 2. Pay to the City of El Segundo one -time fire/life safety mitigauon fees in order to meatus acceptable levels of service. Y followL. A. Prior to issuance of each building permit. 14 cents per square foot of that build:rg s gross floor area. This fee shall be adjusted annually, beginaing January 1992, to reflect the Consumer Price Index published by the United Stated Bureau of Labor Statuum for the Lae Angles Basin/Long Beach Metropolitan Statistical Are& B. In addition to the fee noted above, and recognizing that the fee noted above will not fully support the on -going demands the proposed project &hall place upon the Citys f ire /life safety service apadty, the applicant shall. prior to issuance of each Certificate of Occupanty, provide to the City a one-time capital contribution to purchase capital equipment and facilities for suppressing fires or providing paramedic sernces. This one- time apical contribution ahall be agreed upon by the applicant. the City Manager. City Attorney, and the Fin Chist: but &hall not exceed in value a fee equal to 14 cents per square foot of that buil a gross floor area 3. Pay to the City of El Segundo a one -time police service mitigation fee to maintain accepuble levels of service, as follows: A. Prior to issuance of each building permit. 10.5 cents per square foot of that building's gross floor area. This fee &hall be adjusted annually, beginning January 1992, to reflect the Consumer Price Index published by the United Stated Bureau of Labor Stsusua for the La Angles Basin/Long Beach Metropolitan Statistical Area B. In addition to the fee noted above, and recognizing that the above noted fee will not fully off-set additional man -hour cats. the applicant shall. prior to issuance of each Certificate of Occupancy, pay to the City an additional one -time contribution. This one- time contribution should be agreed upon by the applicant. the City Manager, City Attorney and Police Chief. but ahall not exceed in value a fee equal to 10.5 cents per square foot of that building's groan floor area. 4. Prior to issuance of each building permit. pay a one -time library service mitigation fee of 3 cents per square foot of that building's gross floor area This fee shall be adjusted annually. beginning January 19M to reflect the Consumer Price Index published by the United Stated Bureau of Labor St -b-ia for the Los Angles Bean /Long Beach Metropolitan Statistical Ares. 5. Prior to issuance of each building permit the applicant &hall pay to the County Sanitation District that building'& sewer connection fee. 6. As required previottaly by Ordinance No. 1107, putidpate on a fair -@bare basis in the cost of the tramc agnd intareonnect and u project on Rosemns Avenue between Sepulveda Boulevard and Inglewood Arena. sball consist of applicant depositing a fair - &bare amomat with the City, not b esteed 110.000. upon notification that tsamc timing plans for ' have bessi and frame signal equtpmevat has been identified. based on the p@gows percentage en to o3dedng traffic volumes (as dosaibed in the EIR) on Rosecrans Avenue between Aviation and Dougtat The Department of Public Works &hall coordinate the timing of trame signal modifications to the edent feasible in order to maamize oat savings. Payment shall be made within 60 days of the City's request Payment &hall constitute sstidaction of this condition. 7. As previousiy required by Ordinance No. 1107. pride a bus stop and shelter immediately wrest of Aviation Boulevard provide in conjumdion with the decelssation /right-turn lane (no separate turnout a recommended), to the eatidaetion of the Cigr Trains Engineer. 6. As previously required by Ordinance No. 1107, provide suitable easement or dedication and constrtut a concrete curb, gutter and five -foot wide (minimum) concrete sidewalk along Roseman& Avenue and Dougim Street 6batageL Walks &hall connect to handicap ramps at all intersection& to ntisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. As previously required by Ordinance No. 1107. install a pedestrian crosswalk and pedestrian signal hoods immediately to the north of the Vgjeee Douglas Street driveway, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to occupancy of the hotel or offics, whichever u first 92- 1056312 F) t� 10. As previously required by Ordinance No. 1107, bear the cost of installing emergency vehicle preemptive signalization at the intersections of Roeec ans /Aviation. DougW/Roaecr na ana a third intersection to be selected Jointly by the City Traffic Engineer and Fin Chuf. Thu &hall be considered the applicants fair -share contribution to the City's OPTICOM Systec and shall not erseed =18.000. Payment shall be made within 60 days of the City s request. Payment constitutes satisfaction of this condition. 11. As previously required by Ordinance No. 1107, design. construct and dedicate to the City of Es Segundo a new 14 -foot wide continuous deceleration /right- turn -only lane along the north side of Rosecrans Avenue and the asst side of Douglas Street, betinning approximately at the easterly property line and continuing to the proposed driveway on Douglas. The design and specifications shall be approved by the City Engineer and any dedication shall be included in the final parcel map prior to recordation. 12. As previously required by Ordinance No. 1107 design and install a street lighting system along street frontages to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 13. Plans shall be submitted prior to issuance of the first building permit that indicate the project driveway on either Douglas Street or Roses ans Avenue, or both, will be signalized subject to the requirements of the City Traffic Engineer and City Engineer. Said signaliration shall be completed prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 14. As previously required by Ordinance No. 1107, coa and a now minimum ten -inch water min line in Douglas Street between Rcesaaas Avenue and Park Place. Replace 271 _ feet of the existing eight -inch water main line in Roeecans with a ten -inch water main line to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15. Should cenfiict arise with Condition Nos. 6 through 14, inclusive. and the requirements of Ordinance No. 1107. the provisions of Ordinance No. 1107 shall prevail 16. Modify and relocate traffic signals and pavement striping as requi red by the City Traffic Engineer to accommodate the projed scow and subdivision improvements (bond or improve). 17. Prior to issuance of as& building pamit. plans shall indicate to the saddaction of the Fin Chief that sufficient radii will be provided to aocomodate fire vehicles, Plans shall also indicate In vehicle access will be provided within 150 feet of the main entrance of all buildings by a public street or approved An lane. When adequate access is not provided on-site fire hydrants shall be provided to the saddaetion of the Fin Ch" 18. Prior to the issuance of each grading the applicant shall submit a conatruction [raft. routing plea to the sabdution of the Engineer. which will route construction traffic away from no seamdm dress, Construction access te the prgject shall also be designed so as to minimise iateefaeaee with existing traffic and prevent trucks queuing adjacent to local receptors Construction access shall also be designed to avoid conflicts with access to or from 760 S. Douglas Street 16. Strudvres, obstructions or other private improvement, shall not be constructed within the public rightrotwq as stipulated is Section 1204.060 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. 20. All work within the public right -4way shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the Standard Specifiostions for Public Works Coastructioa and City of M Segundo Standard Spedficatians, No work shall be performed is the public right -ofrwq without first obtaiaxag a Public Works permit 2L Prior to issuance of a building permit all aspects of the site's sewer system. such as design. hook -up, ate are to be approved by the City Engineer. All costs associated with the sewer system an to be borne by the applioat 22. Each lot shall have a separate connection to the County Sanitation District's sanitary sewer main. to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 23.' All aewer laterals in the public righW -wq sball be a minimum of sit (6) inches inside diameter. Material shall be *vitreous cJQ pips'. Farb lateral shall have a Gant (6) inch clean - out brought to grade at the property line and securely capped A BS sin biz shall be placed around the C.O. for protection. The boa shall have a cover embhsoned with the word 'sewer'. If in a traffic are& cover shall be traffic approved (All planned sewer connections shall be checked for elevation prior to starting construction). 24. Design and construct surface water drainage faclities for collection and disposal to the sandaction of the City Enpaeer. These improvements shall be 'on-site' and shall bo constructed prior to issuance of sash Certificate of Occupancy. 92- 1056312 25. Prior to issuance of each building permit, plans shall indicate that all existing and proposed utilities &hall be placed underground to the sausUction of the City Engineer. 26. Encroachment permits must be obtained from the Public Works Department for demolitioc haul -oft Permit mum be obtained at the same time the permit for demohrion is iasued. la encroachment permit for grading is also required when import or export of dirt exceeas fifty (60) cubic yard&. Demolition and grading may be listed on one encroachment permit 27. Prior to each Certificate of Occupancy furnish and install required street signs (i.e. parking restriction, pedestrian crosswalk& etc) to the satisfkcuan of the City Engineer. 28. Prior to issuance of each building permits survey boundary monuments &hall be relocated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 29. Prior to issuance of each building permit, plans &hall show trash compactors and enclosures to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 30. Prior to issuance of sub building permit. plans shall show the utiliration of low-flush toilets. lower - volume water faucets, drinking fountains equipped with self - closing valves, plumbing fixtures which will reduce water two from leakage due to damaged or faulty washers and the installation of restrictions on all plumbing fixtures to the sarisksct on of the City Engineer. 3L Prior to issuance of ash Certificate of Occupancy all cracked. broken, off grade and otherwise damaged curbs6 sidewalks. capptaachse. wheel chair ramps and pavement shall be removed and re leced or re driveways not to be incorporated into the construction shall be removed and replsoad with standard curb and sidewalk. All work shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 32. A cash deposit or surety table to the City Attorney of $14,000 for Lot 2 and $46.000 for Lot 3 to be retained by the ' y for one (1) year from data of completion and acceptance by the City Engineer. This money will be used for correcting latent street damage resulting from construction activities. All money not committed at the end of the one (1) year period &hall be refunded It is the responsibility of the permittee to request refund of dep=L Said funds &hall be paid to each Certificate of Occupancy. 33. Prior to issuance of each building permit. a FUv J G Safety plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Lire CbiaG indicating compliance with the ihre Prevention Bureau Standard P -1-s.. Project Development Guidelines. revised October 1986. or similar guidelines in effect at that time. 34. Implement dust conbml nmo ores required by the AQMD during construction. including maintaining adequate soil moisture ar wall as removing any soil spillage onto traveled roadways through ate housekeeping procedures. 36. Prior to intone of a building permit for the once, plans @hall indicate that the parking fadlity ventilation rates @hall oomph with code requirements. 36. Construction and demolition activities shall eom* with the City of El Segundo Now and Vibration Regulations Chapter 9.06. 37. Dq@ and hoary of construction activity shall compllr with the provision@ of the El Segundo Municipal Coda, Chapter 9.06. 38. That prior to issuance of each building permit plans ahall indicate compliance with 'title 24 of the California Administrative Code, Enerp Coassrvation. to the satisfaction of the Building Official. The project shall be designed in as energy -efficient manna as feasible including, but not limited to, the following enera conservation mwu:es: A) Thermal insulation in compliance with standards established by the State of California MIS Z4). B) Tinted gins, solar reflective glace and insulated Sim shall be evaluated in the project design and &ball be used where appropriate to reduce hearing and cooling loada. C) Phioeueaoant lighting shall be used when appropriate rather than less efficient lighting. D) Public area lighting, both interior and exterior, shall be time - controlled and limited to that necessary for safety and protemoa but shall not preclude reasonable recreation and 'ambient' lighting for facade and landscape enhancements. E) Lighting switebes and inulti♦witcb provisions for control by occupants and building personnel shall be used to permit optimum enerp conservation. 92- 1056312. 6 39. During construction. a project site &hall be enclosed by a six-foot high chain link fence. Cates shall be located at driveways and shall not open out over aide valk /public right -of -way. No material storage is allowed in. the public right-of-way except by permit issued by the Public Works Department. 40. Site development shall comply with the following development standards: Permitted Uses Land uses shall be limited to business parka. research and development faciliues eommercal offices, residence Inn with kitchen Ldlities or a full service hotel. rumuranta. and retail sales and services Floor Area Ratio. As defined by E.S.M.C. Section ?0.06.193. floor area &hall not exceed the total square footage of the net parcel. excluding dedication for dealemuou and acceleration lanes No trander of building area between parcels is allowed Hgj&L Structures shall not exceed a height of 84 feet. se defined in E.S.M.C. Section 20.06. 080. The panting structure shall not exceed ea stories above grade. except that additional stories occupied by recreational uses may be located within the parking structure. not to exceed 84 feet in height QRgL.SMM A minimum of 20% of the total square footage of each lot &hall be devoted to landscaped open space. For purposes of this requirement. open apace &hall mean areas which are landscape& open air amenities to the public including the proposed residence inn hotel pool area and surrounding courtyard Surface parking low interior roadways, penthouse&. paved puss area. and area provided on rooftoppss do not constitute open space. Meandering pedestrian walkways up to 6 feet in width may be included in open space. subject to approval by the Director of Planning. Rerteerena Avenue Frontage Along Rosecrans Avenue a !filly landscaped and maintained yard of 30 feet measured from the property line abutting Iioseaans Avenue after any dedication. Douglas Street Fvontagee Along Douglas Street. Lot No. 2 &hall have a fully landscaped and maintained yard of 25 feet measured kkom the property line abutting Douglas Street after any dedication. esospt that the seuthaly onathird of the - setback area may be reduced to 10-feet to accommodate open parking spaces Lot No. 3 &hall have a My landscaped and maintame yard of 26 feet measured 4&am the property line abutting Douglas Street after any dedication. Santa Fe Railway 8404 -M-W4• Along the north-oewrl'y property line of the proposed eubdividm fee( i ' — the Santa Fe Raiiwq right-of -w WX a yard area �s�less than 20 feet &hall be memli aed This area may be used for An ksae, to the proposed light rail sum, laxideo .. naestao4 open parking spaces or such other purposes u apps owed by the Daectar d Pl&aring. Intender Private Deivewar. A yard of not law than 10 feet measured &am the curb line of the interior private dnvewq. This area &hall be landscaped and maintained. and &hall include a pedestrian sidewalk. Inteelee Let Lkl— All other interior property fins separating Lots 1. 2 and 3 &hall have no setback requirement. Setback crew shall be Hilly landscaped except for the following iatrumms: Pedestrian bridges walkwam recreational amenities Ladem pbW Landscaping requirements shall be a follow Landscaping for the purposes of this eeetion shall consist of trees shrubs. vines. bushes. Dowem ground aoverinp. or any combination tbw"E Landscaping shall not consist of arwkw plants ar turi Landscaping at iate:setioas of streets, alleys. private drives and all other vehicular roadwgs shall, ww* with Section 20.66.000. All landscaped areas ahall be provided with permanent watering facilities 92- 1456312 6 liC.l All landscaped areas &hall be permanently maintained in a neat. clean and healthy condition. This &hall include proper pruning, mowing of lawns, weeding, remora: of litter, fortilisiag and replacement of plants when neeeseary. Drought tolerant plants and landscaping material shall be utilized. General RegW!jjM All lot development shall be regulated as follows: Electrid. telephone, C.A.T.V. and similar service vim or cabin which provide direct service to the property betty developed within the @=*nor boundary lines of such property, ahall be installed underground. Risers on poles and buildings are permitted and shall be provided by the developer or owner onto the pole which provides service to said property. Utility service poles may be placed on the rear of the property to be developed only for the purpose of term=ung underground fadlitiea T'he developer or owner is responsible for complying with the requirements of this section and &ball make the necessary arrangements with the utility companies for the installation of such facilities. Appurtenances and associated equipment such as, but not limited to, surface mounted uwdormars, pedestal mounted terminal bole and meter cabinet& aprinkler manifolds, and concealed duets in an underground systems may be plaid above ground providing such appurtenances and associated equipment are screened from view in a similar manner as aK forth in Section 20.35.140(2). All vents, pipes and similar devioaa which are attached to the building ahall be painted to match the building. Said appurtenances and associated equipment and ae mening shall not be looted and /or screened so as to be viable from the public right-of-,way. Mechanical equipment installed on rooftops &hall be atusetively screened from view. The height of such screening shall meet the =aamum height of &aid equipmanL A storage arcs for carton, containers and trash shall be provided and shielded from view within each building or within an area enclosed by a wall on each lot. the airs and location aubjed to the approval of the Director of Plaaatag and City Engineer. 4L Prior to issuance of each building permit, submit a landscape and Irrigation Pl= subject to approve► by the Meow of Planaiag, Diraetoe of Recreation and Parka, and Chief of Police. The pnVeWs bTICssion system shall be automated and shall be operated and maintained to displace wow aMmently as dictated by a program designed to sibs& the variety of needs of the pnti* 's phnt matmialL Said plan shall indices, as a minimum. the following: A. I doc@PWff armod the paimAw of the project that highlights arc hitactursl features in tar=s of ters:ure and color as toll as buffering the else from adjacent properties. B. Street trees pleated in s000rdanoe with City's street true planting standards including root barrier protection requiremend. C. Information indicating the location, spedse type, and size of landscaping materials prop D. The udlitation of automatic landscape watering pstams. & That all open areas nett used for buildings. surface parking lots, interior roadways. penthouse&, paved pim areas. walls. recreation arena and areas provided on rooftops, shall be atbucdvaly landscaped. P. The use of bees, shrubs. vines, bushes, flowsm ground cvvarings, or any combination thereof. The use of ardfic al plaab or turf is sot pamittad. G. Ladaeap ing at intoreectieos of street&, alley&, private drives and all other vehicular roadwgs shall comply with Section 20.6tl.OK K Drought Worant plants and landscaping material shall be utMzo& All landscaped areas &hall be permanently maintained is a neat. doom and bealthy condition. This shall include proper pruning, mowing of lawns. weeding, removal of litter, fertilu=g and replacement of pleats when necessary. 92- 1056312 coax. W 42. Prior to issuance of each buildiag permit, a lighting plan &hall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Planning and Polio& Chid The plan &hall indicate the location. means aced intensity of all lighting. As a mtaimu= lighting around the parking lot shall be 1 foot andie mmimum maintained for personal and vehicle safety. Low intensity lighting shall be used throughout the =@nor of the project to the degree feasible. 43. Prior to issuance of each building permit. a security plan shall be submitted to and approve, by the Police Chief. As a minimum. the plan shall incorporaia the following measures: A. Each building &hall be addressed by a numeral or letter. a minimum of a inches to height. of contaasting Dolor to the background and clearly visible from the street. parkas and ssalkways. The number or letter shall be illuminated during dark hours and those numbers or letters should correspond with chow on the directory map. B. Pod and spa shall be barred for safety and visibility. Hours for usage and pool rules shall be posted. C. All main entry doors to the suites shall be of solid core construction with a minimum thickness of 1-3/4 inches thick. D. A panoramic door viewer (160.190) shall be installed in the main entry door for each hotel suite. E. Faeh main entry door shall have a deadbolt with a 1 inch projection. The cylinder guard shall be of case hardened steel. with the outer edge angled or tapered and free spuu=g. The exterior part of the lock shall be connected to the inside portion of the lock with bolts at least 1/4 inch in diameter and constructed of steel. The locking mechanism should contain a minimum of a 6 pan tumbler. F. Main entry doors with glass constructed in or within 40 inches (including windows along side @ntry door) of the locirin retaining key eature Q$ � the edd000r double rersedthe position of the window. G. Strikeplste shall be made with a heavy metal and mounted with a minimum of 4-1/2 inch screw* off-eeL H. First story windows and sliding glans doors for the hotel shall have a secondary lock= device to insure against burglary. L Addreswas for each hotel suite shall be a minimum of 4 inches in height, of Contrasting COW to the background and dear and TWMO for emersew purposes. J. A site d rsatasy map shall be posted by entrances) to iadiaate access and locations for suitas, this would be used for smassnp response of P&M. F S sad Parsmedia. 44. Prior to bOWINdM each Project shall submit a &P Plan to ensure compatibility with surrounding area and the aestbodc obje i. of the General Plan. as well as to ensure that am oft do Director n ips PLnft or ��n uf*q- � up � � be a*" to the approval 46. Pricer to issuance of each building permit, the applicant &ball submit to the Director of Plannins and Director of Recreation and Parka for revues and approval, a recreation plan that comprise with the CiWa Industrial Development Reeestm Standards and Guidelines. dated January 2. 1967. 46. Prior to irnanoe of each building permit the develops /applicant shill submit to the Director of Planning and City Traffic Engineer for approval, plane which demonstrate compliance with Ch, 20.66. Developer Tvansportetion System lianagsmaaL In addition to the minimum regtorsmants cited is Chapter 20.66. the shall ineorpomte provisions for employee showem. lechers and bicycle parking areas Cmst:ruebon of the physical LdUties required by the approved plan shall be completed prior to Ceeftficate of Ootup MC7. 47. Prior to issuance of a busiasas license, each PegOd teasat shall submit to the Director of Planning and City Tragic Engmer for approval, a =which demon lMes, compliance with Chapter 20.66, Employer /Oaupant Transportation �7atema MaasgemeaL 92- 1056312 C, 01;; 6 M )��S 48. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for both Lots 2 and 3, plans &hall show to the satidaction of the Director of Planning that a minimum of 18b on-ate parking spaces will be provided for the residence inn/botel. and a minimum of 967 on-ate parking spaces in a parking structure will be provided for the office building. Said parking spaces shall be permanently maintained and may not be reduced by further lot line a ustments, shared parking agreement* with other properties, etc. Parking along the interior driveway shall be prohibited 49. Prior to the issuance of each building permit plan &W show the use of minimally- reflective glass and all other materials used on the building's estenor should be selected with attenuon to minimssag reflective glare. 50. Prior to issuance of a building permit for either Lot 2 or Lot 3, the applicant shall submut to the Director of Planning for administeative review and approval Anal plans Ladies iag substantial compliance with the development standards and conditions of approval imposed by this Ordinance and the Development Agreement. The Director of Plaaaing shall circulate the plans to appropriate City s� /departments for approvaL %goiAcaat changes. as determined by the Director of PLnnuag, ahall be submitted to the Planning Commission for Anal review and approval. 51. Prior to issuance of any building permit a phadns plan ahall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Planning. Said plea @ball incorporate a requirement that no building permit will be imed for the office building prior to permits being issued for the residence u=/hotel and substantial construction progress made. Said plan ahall indicate appropriate and specific provisions ensuring that all required fees. plan. and improvements will be complied with. 52. The developer &hall record reciprocal easement agreements to share and maintain common Are/lift safety systems as required by the I'm Chief prior to occupancy of the first building. 53. The Development Agreement shall be revised to incorporate provisions providing that the rights granted by this approval may not be tranderred ftm Continental Development Corporation to any other entity. SECTION L This Ordinance shall become effective at midnight on the thirtieth day from and after the Anal passage and adoption hermt SECTION L The City Clerk shall cubs to the pasnaga and adoption of this Ordinance: shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original Ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the paragr and adopc�on thereof in the records of the meeting at which the same u passed and adopted.• sad ahall within fifteen days after the pomp and adoption thereof~ cause the same to be published once in the M Sepmdo herald. a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and drttrlated within said City of El Sepmdo and whiff is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED. A 77" DOPTED We Sh dy of Ngmmhm 1690. maw @cohesive, City of in ft mdo 92- 1056332. u.zoa.uaa 9 �. �ot� WPX /RVW /AGR72951f i� authority of such other public agencies. City agrees to cooperate with Company, at no cost to Company, in securing any and all permits which may be required by any other such agency. III. PUBLIC BENEFITS .it.., .e. ., - T.• '-35IFF-UPT-IMINNEM , parties .acknowledge and agree that development of the Property will result in substantial public needs which will not be fully met by the Project Approvals and further acknowledge and agree that this Agreement confers substantial private benefits on Company which should be balanced by commensurate public benefits. Accordingly, the parties intend to provide consideration to the public to balance the private benefits conferred on Company by providing more fully for the satisfaction of the public needs resulting from the Project as contained in Exhibits B, C and D which are incorporated herein by this reference. •RMi•Y1' 4.1 Periodic Review. The Planning Commission shall review this Agreement at a public hearing, as set out in Resolution No. 3268, as it may be amended from time to time, in order to ascertain the good faith compliance by Company with the terms of the Agreement. -17- 92' 1056312 iiO1 ,0J WPX /RVW /AGR72951f (a) The Director of Planning shall begin the review by giving notice to Company that the City will commence its annual review of this Agreement. Such notice shall be given at least (22) days in advance of the public hearing. (b) The Company shall pay to City an annual review and administration fee sufficient to defray the estimated costs of review and administration of the Agreement (including but not limited to the cost of notice and hearing) during the succeeding year. The amount of the annual review and administration fee shall be set annually by resolution of the City Council. (c) The failure of City to timely conduct an annual review hereunder shall not constitute a default by City under this Agreement or invalidate it, nor shall such failure in any way constitute a waiver by City of any default of Company or diminish, impede or abrogate the rights or privileges of either party hereunder. 4.2 Special Review. The City Council also may order a special review of compliance with this Agreement at any time. The Planning Commission shall conduct such special review as set out in Resolution No. 3268 for annual reviews. -is- 92-1056312 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f �3 V. DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES 5.1 ,Specific Performance. The parties acknowledge that money damages and remedies at law generally are inadequate and specific performance and other non - monetary relief are particularly appropriate remedies for the enforcement of this Agreement and should be available to all parties for the following reasons: (a) Money damages are inadequate to compensate either party for the unique benefits available through this agreement. (b) Due to the size, nature and scope of the project, it may not be practical or possible to restore the Property to its natural condition once implementation of this Agreement has begun. After such implementation, Company may be foreclosed from other choices it may have had to utilize the Property or portions thereof. Company has invested significant time and resources and performed extensive planning and processing of the Project in agreeing to the terms of this Agreement and will be investing even more significant time and resources in implementing the Project in reliance upon the terms of this Agreement, and it is not possible to determine the sum of money which would adequately compensate Company for such efforts. Notwithstanding the above, it is understood and agreed between City and Company that City shall not enforce this `.� -19- 92- 1056312 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f provision to require specific performance hereunder unless Company has commenced the project and specific performance is necessary to enforce the terms and conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibits "C" and "D" hereto. Default of Comnanv. City may terminate or modify this Agreement for any failure of Company to perform any material duty or obligation of Company under this Agreement, or to comply in good faith with the terms of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "default "); provided, however, City may terminate or modify this Agreement pursuant to this section only after providing written notice to Company of default setting forth the nature of the default and the actions, if any, required by Company to cure such default and, where the default can be cured, Company has failed to take such actions and cure such default within 60 days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such default cannot be cured within such 60 day period but can be cured within a longer time, has failed to commence the actions necessary to cure such default within such 60 day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and cure such default. v{{ e- ., ,. {{ e . Company may terminate this Agreement only in the event of a default by City in the performance of a material duty or -20- 92- 1056312 010F WPX /RVW /AGR72951f obligation of City under this Agreement or to comply in good faith with the terms of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "default "); provided, however, Company may terminate this agreement pursuant to this Section only after providing written notice to City of default setting forth the nature of the default and the actions, if any, required by City to cure such default and, where the default can be cured, City has failed to take such actions and cure such default within 60 days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such default cannot be cured within such 60 day period but can be cured within a longer time, has failed to commence the actions necessary to cure such default within such 60 day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and cure such default. VI. LEGAL ACTIONS Company at its expense, including attorneys' fees, shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless City, its agents, officers and employees, from any claim, action or proceedings against City, its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Agreement or the approval of any permit granted pursuant to this Agreement. City shall promptly notify Company of any such claim, action or proceeding, and City shall cooperate -21- 92_1056312 01�� WPX /RVW /AGR72951f in its defense. If City fails to promptly notify Company of any such claim, action or proceeding, or if City fails to cooperate in the defense, Company shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, protect, indemnify, or hold harmless City. 6.2 Indemnity. In addition to the provisions of 6.1 above, Company at its sole expense, including attorney's fees, shall indemnify, protect and hold City, its officers, agents, employees, attorneys and independent contractors free and harmless from any liability whatsoever, based or asserted upon any act or omission of Company, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors and independent contractors, for property damage, bodily injury, or death (company's employees included) or any other element of damage of any kind or nature, relating to or in any way connected with or arising from the activities contemplated hereunder, including, but not limited to, the study, design, engineering, construction, completion, failure and conveyance of the public improvements, save and except claims for damages arising through the active negligence or willful misconduct of City. Provided however that unless City is solely negligent that Company shall in any other case, regardless of comparative negligence, indemnify City for all of its attorney fees and litigation costs. City in its discretion may participate in the defense of any such legal action. —� -22- 92- 1055312 0110 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f 6.3 Environmental Assurances. Company shall protect, indemnify and hold City, its officers, agents, attorneys and employees free and harmless from any and all liability, based or asserted upon any act or omission of Company, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, predecessors in interest, successors, and independent contractors for any violation of any federal, state or local law, ordinance or regulation relating to industrial hygiene or environmental conditions on, under or about the property, including, but not limited to, soil and groundwater conditions. City may at its discretion participate in the defense of any such action. 6.4 Reservation of Rights. With respect to Sections 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3 herein, City reserves the right to either (1) approve the attorney(s) which Company selects, hires or otherwise engages to defend hereunder, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld; or (2) conduct its own defense; provided, however, that Company shall reimburse City forthwith for any and all reasonable expenses incurred for such defense, including attorneys' fees, upon billing and accounting therefor. If City elects to conduct its own defense at Company's expense Company shall have a right of approval over counsel chosen by City. However, Company shall not unreasonably withhold that approval. 1� r , -23- 92- 1056312 J i 1 1 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f 6.5 Attorney's Fees. If either party brings an action or proceeding (including without limitation, any cross - complaint, counterclaim, or third -party claim) against the other party for breach of this Agreement or to enforce any provision of it, or otherwise arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to its costs and expenses of suit, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees, which shall be payable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment, in addition to reasonable costs and expenses. "Prevailing party" within the meaning of this Section shall include, without limitation, a party who dismisses an action for recovery hereunder in exchange for payment of the sums allegedly due, performance of covenants allegedly breached, or consideration substantially equal to the relief sought in the action. 6.6 Certain Obligations Not Recourse. Notwith- standing anything to the contrary herein contained, no elective or appointive board, commission, officer, agent or employee of the City, and no partner, officer, director, employee, shareholder, trustee, beneficiary or agent of Company, shall be personally liable upon any of the obligations of City or Company hereunder (except for bad faith and fraud claims), and each party shall look solely to the assets of Company or City (as the case may be) and shall -24- 92- 1056312 Q 01.1 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f have no right of recourse against the assets of any such other Person herein specified. 6.7 Survival. The provisions of this Section VI, inclusive, shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 7.1 Estoggel Certificate. Either party may, at any time, and from time to time, deliver written notice to the other party requesting such party to certify in writing that, to the knowledge of the certifying party, (i) this Agreement is in full force and effect and a binding obligation of the parties; (ii) this Agreement has not been amended or modified either orally or in writing, and if so amended, identifying the amendments; and (iii) the requesting party is not in default in the performance of its obligations under. this Agreement, of if in default, to describe therein the nature and amount of any such defaults. A party receiving a request hereunder shall execute and return such certificate within thirty (30) days following the receipt thereof. The Director of Planning of City shall have the right to execute any certificate requested by Company hereunder. City acknowledges that a certificate hereunder may be relied upon by transferees and Mortgagees. -25- 92- 1456312 M4 6011 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f •, 7.2 Mortgagee Protection; Certain Rights of Cure. (a) Mortgagee Protection. No breach hereof shall defeat, or render invalid the lien of any Mortgage on the Property made in good faith and for value, unless otherwise required by law, but all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and effective against any Person (including any Mortgagee), who acquires title to the Property, or any portion thereof, by foreclosure, trustee's sale, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or otherwise. (b) Mortgagee Not Obligated. Notwithstand- ing the provisions of Section 7.1 above, no Mortgagee shall have any obligation or duty under this Agreement to construct or complete the construction of improvements, or to guarantee such construction or completion; provided, however, that a Mortgagee shall not be entitled to devote the Property to any uses or to construct any improvements hereunder therefor unless it assumes the obligations of this agreement. Said mortgagee shall have no other vested rights to improve the property other than those provided herein. Mortgagee to Cure. If City receives notice from Mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given Company hereunder and specifying the address for service thereof, then City shall deliver to such Mortgagee, concurrently with -26- ^J 92- 105012 0 � � WPX /RVW /AGR72951f service thereon to Company, any notice given to Company with respect to any claim by City that Company has committed a default, and if City makes a determination under Sections 5.2 and 5.3 above, City shall likewise serve notice of such noncompliance on such Mortgagee concurrently with service thereof on Company. Each Mortgagee shall have the right (but not the obligation) for a period of ninety (90) days after the receipt of such notice from the City to cure or remedy, or to commence to cure or remedy, the default claimed or the areas of noncompliance set forth in the City's notice. If the default or such noncompliance is of a nature which can only be remedied or cured by such Mortgagee upon obtaining possession, such Mortgagee shall, at its option, seek to obtain possession with diligence and continuity through a receiver or otherwise, and shall thereafter remedy or cure the default or noncompliance within ninety (90) days after obtaining possession. If any such default or noncompliance cannot, with diligence, be remedied or cured within such ninety (90) day periods, then such mortgagee shall have such additional time as may be reasonably necessary to remedy or cure such default or noncompliance if such mortgagee commences cure during such ninety (90) day periods, and thereafter diligently pursues completion of such cure to the extent possible. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this -27- 92 -IOWn i 3� WPX /RVW /AGR72951f Agreement shall be deemed to permit or authorize any Mortgagee to undertake or continue construction or completion of any improvements comprising the Project (beyond the extent necessary to conserve or protect improvements or construction already made) without first having expressly assumed Company's obligation hereunder by executing an assumption agreement in a form satisfactory to City, by which it fully assumes all of the burdens and obligations of this agreement with regard to the lot it acquires. Iprovements. If, within six (6) months after an Event of Default by Company, a Mortgagee has not exercised the option to cure under Section 7.2(c) above, or has exercised such option but has not proceeded diligently with cure, then upon 10 days notice to mortgagee and Company by the City the rights of Company and its successors under this agreement shall terminate on the 10th day. Alternatively, City may either (a) purchase the Mortgage (including the interest of any lessor under a sale or leaseback arrangement), by payment to the Mortgagee thereunder of the amount of the unpaid debt, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, or, in the case of a lessor, by payment to such lessor of the purchase price paid for its interest in the Property and any unpaid rent or other charges payable to it under its -28- 92- 1055312 o c 1.1 F; WPX /RVW /AGR72951f applicable agreements with Company or (b) if ownership of the Property (or any portion thereof) has vested in the Mortgagee, purchase from such Mortgagee such interest upon payment to such Mortgagee of an amount equal to the sum of the following: (i) the unpaid Mortgage at the time title became vested in the Mortgagee (less all appropriate credits, including those resulting from collection and application of rentals and other income received during foreclosure proceedings), (ii) all expenses with respect to foreclosure, (iii) the net expenses, if any (exclusive of general overhead), incurred by the Mortgagee as a result of the subsequent ownership or management of the Property, or any portion thereof, (iv) the costs of any improvement made by such mortgagee, and (v) an amount equivalent to the interest that would have accrued on the aggregate of such sums had all such amounts become part of the Mortgage debt and such debt had continued in existence to the day of payment by the City. VIII. MISCELLANEOUS 8.1 TA=. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and Company shall have five (5) years from that date in which to apply for building permits unless this agreement is sooner terminated or extended by mutual written consent. Once Company has obtained its building permits, -29- 9,2- 1056312 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f �Y this agreement shall continue until the building permits (including any extension to the term of the building permits which the City may grant, providing the Director of Planning receives notice of the application for extension) expire or the project is complete, whichever occurs first, unless sooner terminated. Company may apply, at any time during the initial five (5) year term, for an extension of up to an additional five (5) years which shall be subject to the discretionary review of the City Planning Commission and City Council. 8.2 Permitted Delays. In addition to any specific provisions of this Agreement, performance by Company of its obligations hereunder shall be excused during any period of delay caused at any time before termination or expiration of this Agreement by reason of acts of God or civil commotion, riots, strikes, picketing, or other labor disputes, national shortages of materials or supplies, or damage to work in process of by reason of fire, floods, earthquake, or other casualties or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of the City and Company. Company shall promptly notify the City in writing of any delay hereunder as soon as possible after the same has been ascertained. The term of this Agreement shall be extended by the period of any delay hereunder. -30- 92- 1056312 '-" 01 IF WPX /RVW /AGR72951f 8.3 Public Agency Delays. Any delay caused by restrictions imposed or mandated by any public agency (excluding City) not contemplated by this agreement shall cause the term hereof to be extended by a period equal to the time of the delay. 8.4 City Delays. If any City approvals required hereunder shall be unreasonably delayed beyond the normal time period by no fault of Company, the term of this agreement shall be extended by a period equal to the time of the delay. 8.5 Termination. This Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further effect upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) Expiration of the stated term of this Agreement as set forth in Section 8.1; (b) Entry of a final judgment setting aside, voiding or annulling the adoption of the ordinance approving this Agreement and the exhaustion of all appeals; (c) The adoption of a referendum measure overriding or repealing the ordinance approving this Agreement and the exhaustion of any legal remedies thereto; (d) Completion of the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, including all required i occupancy permits, and acceptance by City or the applicable public agency of all required dedications. —ts_ -31- 92- 1056319 G'ol_i9 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f Termination of this Agreement shall not constitute termination of any other land use entitlements approved for the Property. Upon the termination of this Agreement, no party shall have any further right or obligation hereunder except with respect to any obligation to prior to such termination or with respect the performance of the provisions of this has occurred prior to such termination or any obligations with are specifically set this Agreement. �O have been performed to any default in Agreement which with respect to forth as surviving 8.6 Covenants Run With the Land. All of the provisions, agreements, rights, powers, standards, terms, covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and their respective heirs, successors (by merger, consolidation, or otherwise) and assigns, devisees, administrators, representatives, lessees, and all other persons acquiring the Property, or any portion thereof, or any interest therein, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever, and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors (by merger, consolidation or otherwise) and assigns. All of the provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running with the land pursuant to applicable law, including, but not limited to, Section 1468 of the Civil Code of the -32- 92- 1456312 0 12 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f �1 State of California. Each covenant to do or refrain from doing some act on the Property hereunder, (a) is for the benefit of such properties and is a burden upon the Property, (b) runs with the Property, and (c) is binding upon each successive owner during its ownership of Property or any portion thereof, and each person having any interest therein derived in any manner through any owner of the property or any portion thereof, and shall benefit such party and the Property hereunder, and each other person succeeding to an interest in such Property. 8.7 Relationship of Parties. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the contractual relationship created between the parties hereunder is that Company is an independent contractor and not an agent of City. Nothing contained herein or in any document executed in connection herewith shall be construed as making City and Company joint venturers or partners. 8.8 Transfer. Company shall have the right, with the approval of City which shall not be unreasonably withheld, to sell, transfer or assign Parcel 2 to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Agreement; provided, however, that any such sale, transfer or assignment shall include the assignment and assumption of the rights, duties and obligations arising under or from this Agreement as to -33- 92- 105631? WPX /RVW /AGR72951f '} J the lot sold, transferred or assigned and be made in strict compliance with the following conditions precedent: however, any such assignment shall not relieve Company of its duties and obligations hereunder unless the consent of City is obtained to the assignment, sale or transfer and the assignee, buyer or transferee executes an assumption agree- ment satisfactory to City as hereinafter provided in 8.9. The rights granted Company under this agreement regarding Parcel 3 may not be transferred from Company to any other entity except as provided for in Article VII herein. Sale of Parcel 3 by Company shall terminate the benefits of this agreement to Company as regards that Parcel. (a) No sale, transfer or assignment of any right or interest for Parcel 2 under this Agreement shall be made unless made together with the sale, transfer or assignment of all or a part of the Property. (b) Prior to such sale, transfer or assign- ment of Parcel 2, City shall consent thereto. Company shall notify, City in writing of such proposed sale, transfer or assignment and shall provide City with a form of agreement, reasonably acceptable to City, to be executed by the purchaser, transferee or assignee, providing that the purchaser, transferee or assignee expressly and uncondition- ally assumes all the duties and obligations of Company under this Agreement. City shall be entitled to consider factors -34- 92- 1056312 ; ; 0 1 ' 2 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f such as the purchaser, assignee or transferee's financial capability and development expertise and to impose conditions upon its consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. City shall promptly review such documents and factors. Company shall be fully responsible for the obligations of this agreement until City shall accept an executed assumption agreement from the transferee. Any sale, transfer or assignment of Parcel 2 not made in strict compliance with the foregoing conditions shall constitute a default by Company under this Agree- ment. The benefits of this Agreement shall not inure to such purchaser, transferee or assignee until and unless such agreement is executed. 8.9 Release of Transferring Owner. Notwith- standing any sale, transfer or assignment, Company shall continue to be obligated under this Agreement unless Company is given a release in writing by City, which release shall be provided by City upon the full satisfaction by such transferring Company of all of the following conditions: (a) Company no longer has a legal or equitable interest in all or any part of the Property. (b) Company is not then in default under this Agreement. -35- GO- l0tW12 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f (c) Company has provided City with the J notice and executed agreement required under Section 8.8(b) above. (d) The purchaser, transferee or assignee provides City with security equivalent to any security previously provided by Company to secure performance of its obligations hereunder and meets any and all other conditions imposed by City on the purchase, transfer or assignment. (e) With regard to a transfer or assignment of Parcel 2, the Purchaser, transferee or assignee provides City with a fully executed assumption agreement, in a form satisfactory to City, by which it fully assumes all of the burdens and obligations of this agreement as to the lot sold, transferred or assigned. 8.10 Subsequent Assignment. Any subsequent sale, transfer or assignment of Parcel 2 after an initial sale, transfer or assignment shall be made only in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Section. 8.11 Notices. All notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be effective when personally delivered or 48 hours after deposit in the United States mail first - class, as registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the following representatives of the parties at the addresses indicated below: -36- 92- 1056312 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f If to City: City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, California 90245 Attn: Planning Director If to Company: Continental Development Corporation 2041 Rosecrans Avenues El Segundo, CA 90245 Attn: President and C.C. to General Counsel And copy to: Summerfield Hotel Corporation 18300 Von Karman, Suite 430 Irvine, CA 92715 Attn: Mr. Robert E. Mossburg Mortgagee: Either party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. 6.12 Amendment or Cancellation. This Agreement may be amended or cancelled in whole or in part by mutual consent of the parties or their successors in interest in accordance with the provisions of Section 65868 of the Development Agreement Act and City's Resolution No. 3268. 8.13 Recordation of Agreement. This Agreement and any amendment or cancellation to it shall be recorded with the County Recorder by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors within the period required by Section 65868.5 of the Government Code. 8.14 Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire understanding and agreement of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or -37- 92- 105631 . tie 11F WPX /RVW /AGR72951f agreements which are not contained or expressly referred to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations, understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement. 8.15 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be determined invalid, void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby to the extent such remaining provisions are not rendered impractical to perform taking into consideration the purposes of this Agreement or the rights and obligations of the parties have been materially altered or abridged. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provision of the conditions and obligations set forth in Section 3.1 of this Agreement, including the payment of the fees set forth therein, are essential elements of this Agreement and City would not have entered into this Agreement but for such provisions, and therefore in the event such provisions are determined to be invalid, void or unenforceable, this entire Agreement shall be null and void and of no force and effect whatsoever. -38- 92- 1056312 c 1 WPX /RVW /AGR72951f y. •� �� _ Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 8.17 Section Headings. All section headings and subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement. 8.18 angular and Plural. As used herein, the singular or any word includes the plural. 8.19 Joint and Several Obligations. If at any time during the term of this Agreement the Property is owned, in whole or in part, by more than one owner, or any lot is sold, transferred or assigned, and if any new joint owners or individual lot owner shall sign assumption agreements acceptable to City, then each owner shall only be liable for default of the provisions of this agreement that apply to the lot sold or to the extent of their ownership interest in the Property if the entire property is held in joint ownership. 8.20 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement as to which time is an element. 8.21 No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the parties and their successors and assigns. No other -39- 92 -1OW12 (),01;?? WPX /RVW /AGR72951f person shall have any right of action based upon any provision of this Agreement. 8.22 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the parties in counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all of the parties had executed the same instrument. 8.23 Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Agreement. Upon the request of either party at any time, the other party shall promptly execute, with acknowledgement or affidavit if reasonably required, and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary under the terms of this Agreement to carry out the intent and to fulfill the provisions of this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 8.24 Eminent Domain. No provision of this Agreement shall be construed to limit or restrict the exercise by City of its power of eminent domain. 8.25 Authority to Execute. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of OWNER warrants the represents that he /they have the authority to execute this -40- 92- 1056312 e .� 4 �� WPX /RVW /AGR72951f Agreement on behalf of his /their corporation, partnership or business entity and warrants and represents that he /they has /have the authority to bind OWNER to the performance of its obligations hereunder. a, Executed this day of , 199�C CI By A CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION By mi By ity Clerk Richard Lundquist, President By ijaonara E. Blakesley, Jr., Secretary -41- 92- 1056312 Go] 2.9 i i J ALL PURPOSE CERTIFICATE State of California County of Los Angeles /`. On \ ` before me, 1 I N ! `...: (Notary), personally appeared Richard C. Lundquist and Leonard E. Blakesrey, Jr., personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacityies, and that their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ',,NNo-ti..>. . ��1U t.a... (Seal) OFFICUU,s L 1AARCIAJ MURPAY Notary Pubho"lania TZ! LOB ANGLES OOUNYY My Comm. Exp. Apr. 9.190.1 CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT : 66..66....... 6...........6........... State of California SS. Countv of Los Angeles 92- 1056312 .............. 0........... osrICIAt aVu J. O. ABREU ..".e.60000 ................... 0 ... On this the 18th jav of ::arch 19-L2— before me. J. 0. Abreu, the undersigned Notary Public. personally appeared Carl Jacobson, Mayor and Ronald L. Hart. Citv Clerk- U personally known to me : O proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons) who executed the within instrument as Mayor b City Clerk or on behalf of the corporation therein named. and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. 6407MY AMX • CAUPOOM LOS AMSLLIS COUNTY . . Ur C M% a rw. Aug. rs. ins ary s Signature • .............................................................. ............................... 92- 1056312 0130 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION i Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map No. 17158. 92- 1056312 !-,n,3, KWA '� EXHIBIT B PROJECT APPROVALS Project approvals as defined in IJ shall include but not be limited to the following permits and entitlements. Ordinance No. 1107 of the City Council of the City of El Segundo. Resolution 2291 of the Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo. Resolution 3660 of the City Council of the City of El Segundo. Ordinance 1157 of the City Council of the City of El Segundo. Agreement for Subdivision Improvements, dated June 9, 1998. Agreement Affecting Real Property, dated June 9, 1988. 92- 1056312 RESOLUTION NO. 156'= Exhibit C. AN RESOLUTION OF THE CTTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO. CALIFORNIA. CERTLFTING ENVMONM>:':NTAL ASSESSMENT NO. EA -206 ADDENDUM TO THE ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL DVACT REPORT FOR CONTINENTAL PARK PHASE V AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION, APPROVING SUB 90.10 /LOT LINE ADJUS'T'MENT FOR PARCEL MAP 17181, AND APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR A MIXED USE PROJECT AT 2301.2381 ROSECRANS AVENUE /810420 DOUGLAS STREET. WHEREAS, on September 27. 1989 an application was received from Continental Development Corporation for EA -206. Sub 90.10. Precise Plan 89.t and a Development Agreement to allow a 6- story office building and associated parking structure, and a 6 -story, 182 room residence inn with kitchen facilities or a full - service hoteL for property at 2301.2381 Rosecrans Avenue/ 810 -820 Douglass Street; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Preparation was Sled on February 6. 1990 for preparation of the Environmental Impact Report and duly circulated and noticed as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report identified significant adverse cumulative traMc /circulation and air quality impacts which cannot be mitigated to an iangaifiant level by conditions imposed on the project. WHEREAS, on August 23 and September 13. 1990 the Plaaaiag Commission did hold. pursuant to law, duly - advertised public hearings on such matter, and notice of hearing was given in the time. form and manner prescribed by law; and WHEREAS. on Se umber 13. 1990 the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2291 recommending to the City Council osstiseation of EA -206 an Environmental Impact Report and adoption of a statement of overriding considerations. approval of Precise Plan No. 89.2, approval of Subdivision No. 90.10/Lot Line Adjustment for Parcel Map No. 17168. and approval of a Development Agreement; and WHEREAS. on October 2 . October 16, and November 6. 1990 the City Council did hold. pursuant to law, duly- advertised public hearings on such matter, and notice of hearing was given in the time, form and manner prescribed by law: and WHEREAS. opportunity was given to all persons to present testimony or documentary evidence for or against EA -206. Precise Plan 80.2, Sub 90.10 and the Development Agreement: and WHEREA& at acid hearing the following few and Sndinga were established 1. The project site consists of 9.69 acres that are proposed for subdivision into lots of 6.75 acres and 2.94 aces. 2. The szisting M4 zoning for the site is inconsistent with the ezisting General Plan Lind Use designation of the cite for Commercial Mani bauring uses. and a Precise Plan application is one of several procedures available whereby consistency between the zoning and General Plan can be achieved 3. The City council previouaiy adopted Ordinance No. 1107 on March L 1988 denying Precise Plan 87.1 as Ono-MA nt detail for the develo nt on Lob 2 and 3 was provided: and a"Canng the proposed subdivision and for development of Lot 1 with commercial omen space at a ma .mum PAR of L0, after dedications. not to exceed 196.000 q. tk. 4. Surrounding zoning and General Plan land use design-bon in the City of El Segundo is C -M. Commercial Manufacturing. In the City of Manhattan Beach, zoning is M -2 and CPD (Commercial Planned Development) Zoning in the City of Hawthorne is R -1 north of Rosecrans Avenue. and M -1 and M4 to the south. Surrounding land use is general office, light manufacturing, and 'PAV, with single - family residential use east of Aviation Boulevard. S. A long -term goal of the adopted General Plan Land Use Element is the replacement of heavy industry which has detrimental noise, odor mad asethetic effects with dean, quiet, high tech - oriented manufacturing and research use& and replacement of obsolete buildings with well - pknn@c• high - quality d Ic pments mdud+ng landemping, b* architectural standards. underground utilities, adequate parking and pedestrian improvement& i o j 3 92- 1056312 �'" 6. Tae fiscal impact analysis prepared for the project indicates that the projea wall Qeaerate annual municipal revenues of approximately $786,726.60. 7. The proposed Development Agreement will be for an initial 5 year period. The applican• =11 apply for one additional 6 you extension subject to discretionary review and approval by =e Planains Commission and /or City Council 8. The project will have building heights of 84 feet ma1omum. parkins in conformance with code requirements. and maximum floor area ratio of L0, after dedications. 9. The Subdivision includes improvements for water, sewer, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy conservation, streets, public transit and pedestrian facilities necessary to support the land uses and density proposed for the site. 10. The proposed map, design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the General om Plan Land Use designation of Cm Maaufac__. , and the proposed Precise Plan. The proposed land uses. design standards and improvements are consistent with long -term General Plan objectives for replacing heavy industry with clean. quiet. well- planned high Quality development 1L The site is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development. The ate is level and is not located in an area of unstable topography, flood hasards, or fault rupture study zone. The pascals created by the proposed subdivision have adequate frontage on public streets, and exceed the minimum parcel size established for the underlying M -2 zone. 12. With the provision of redproal awsss easements. the proposed subdivision and improvements will provide adequate access through and use of the subdivision. 13. The design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project is required to be connected to the County Sanitation District samcary sewer system and will be directed to the District's Carson sewsp treatment plant, whuh has sufficient capacity to serve the project waste water Dow. ENVIRONMENTAL / STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION 14. The Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and completed in compliance with CEQ, and was presented to and reviewed by the City Counal prior to any determination on the proposed psgjwL 15. Tae Eaviroammtal Impact Report is a complete and adequate document properly identifying potential environmental impacts and potential mitigation measures to reduce the identified impaeca 16. Three Environmental Impact Reports have been prepared for prmoua projects proposed on the cite: Final Environmental Impact Report for Continental Park Phase V (certified August. 1986); Final Subsequent F.avi:vnmental lnpact Report for the City - Initiated Zone Change, Northeast carne: of Dou4in Street and Rowcrsns Aveaw (Ssptambar, 1887} and Addendum to the Final Eavironmsata� Impact Report for Continental Park Phase V (certified Mach. 1988). 17. The Environmental Impact Report Addendum to the Addendum identified impacts which are potentially significantly adverse, and which cannot be mitigated to an insig nifieaat level by ooaditions imposed upon the project in the areas of traffic /circulation and air quality. 18. The psgpd as designed will have a significant effect on the loci environment as increased trafc /dnu"m volumes will decrease the lsval of service at surrounding nearby intersections and increase air emissions. The prgjects will generate approximately 4.590 vehicle tripe per day an the street systems serving the general area. with an estimated 2.296 inbound and 2.295 outbound trips resulting in significant increases at five intersections. All feasible mitigation measures as identified in the Environmental Impact Report have been incorporated into the p roject Project traffic and related air quality �mpa�a will not be mitigated to an insignificant level even with inclusion of the identified feasible mitigation measures. Incremental dwebpmsaL on a lot by lot basis will alto result is significant unmitigated trafc and air quality impacts. 19. Unavoidable adverse impact are outweighed by the project benefits which include fulfillment of long-term land use goals to replace and upgrade heavy industry and obsolete buildiar. proviclini high-quality planned developments with upgraded landscaping, underground uulir open space, pedestrian plazas and quality design at a major entrance to the City in furtherat.. 92- 1056312 2 of land use and aesthetic koala; providing construction and long-term employment opport=nes: contributing financially to improvement of the traffic circulation system: and coatnbuung to a logic eaension of the type df land use and development emsm and planned in the project vidnity. 20. The Final EIR identifies project alternatives which would reduce environmental efflects. however, the City Council hereby finds that thew are infeasible for economic, social and other conaidention& The 'no project' alterative would not implement the long-term land use and aesthetic objectives of replacing heavy industry and obsolete buildup with clean. light, well. planned development, and would result in lost construction and permanent employment opportunities. The 'development under e:istug soning' alternative would result in increased heavy industrial development with impacts on stationary noise, air quality and aestheuce. Tha alternative would not achieve long -term objectives for replacing heavy industrial uses south clean, light, high tech-ononted land uses and would not be consistent with surrounding development and planned land use. 21. Two major capital projects could improve t:uffic circulation, but the City Council hereby finds that implementation w not within the jurisdiction of the City of El Segundo. The light rail transit line planned adjacent to the site a the responsibility of the County Tlansportauon Commission Reeonsumetion of the Rosecrans /Aviation bridge will involve mull- Jurisdicuonal sgreemanta and cooperation of the affected railroad 22. The Final EIR identifies the construedait of a Douglas Street extension as a mitigation measure for make circulation impacts. The City Council hereby finds that there are certain economic and other eonsideratioaa which make infeasible a requirement that Douglas Street be constructed prior to issuance of building permits, however, the City Council has previously supported the extendon of Douglas Street. Construction of the extension is antadpated to can &U million and requires coordination of the City. the Public Utilities Commiamon. and the affected railroad For this reason. construction will take several years to complete and time frames cannot be reasonably assured. These fadon would make project financing infeasible and would in effect emoutute a project denial. If required prior to imuanae of building permit& The project will. however. be required to contribute funding toward construction of the Douglas Street e:tension or other regional transportation improvements, acid to implement tnp reduction measures as part of a project t musportatim systems management plan. 29. in accordance with El Segundo Municipal Code Section 16.09.010 and the California Envinumentsl Quality Ass. a building permit may not be issued for the project unless the dociann•making body determine that the projees will *not bens a potentially significant eQect on the environment a that the significant environmental effects of the project would be mitigated or are acceptable based an finduW included in a Statement of Ovemding Coasidaratioaa in accordance with CEQA. SECTION i The City Council hereby certifies EA•20L an Addendum to the Addendum to the Enviroamentol Imp" Report for Cantmental Park Phase V. adopts a Statement of Overriding Conaid�erations, approves SUB 90-10/Imt Line Adjustment for Parcel Map 1715L and approves a Development Agreement subject to the following conditions and mitigation measures: L Prior to iasuaaee of each Certificate of Occupancy, applicant shall psy to the City of El Segundo a one-time traffic improvement fee in the amount of $L00 per square foot of that building's grow floor are& The purpose of the traffic improvement fes is to fund traffic system improvements to mitipte the adverse an wale circulation attrbutable to the project on shall be used for the consavct oa of capital maprovemanta within a one -mile radius of the project site, as identified in the General Plan, Capital Improvement Program or other local and /or regional transportation improvement plan. as determined by the City Council. This fee Wall Metropolitan be adjusted annually, beginning January 1992, to reflect the Consumer Pace Index published by the United Stated Bureau Arse. of Labor Statiodas for the Les Angles Basin /Long Waco 2. Pay to the City of El Segundo one -time fire/Iife Moiety mitigation fees in order to maintain acceptable levels of service. of follow= A. Prior to issuance of sash building permit► 14 cents per wows foot of that building's gross floor areet This fee shall be adjuausd aanualb, beginning January 11102. to reflect the Consumer Price Indat published by the United Stated Bureau of Labor Stausucs for the Ives Angles Baca /Long Beseh Metropolitan Statistical Area. B. In addition to the fee noted above, and recogaixing that the fee noted above will not My support the Gulping demaads the proposed project !hall place upon the City's fire file safety serous apanty, the appliaat shall. prior to tasuaaa of each COMAate of Occupancy, provide to the City a one -time capital contribution to purchase capital equipment and facilities for suppressing fires or providing paramedic seances. This one- 92- 1056312 time capital contribution shall be agreed upon by the applicant. the City Mam er. C:ry Attorney. and the Fire Chief, but &hail not exceed in value a fee equal to 14 ants per square foot of that building's gross floor area. 3. Pay to the City of El Segundo a one -time police service miti8auon fee to maintua accep:sbie levels of service, as follows: A. Prior to issuance of each building permit. 10.5 ants per square foot of that build:a`, gross floor area. This foe shall be adjusted annually. begtnnins January 1992. to reflect the Consumer Price Index published by the United Stated Bureau of Labor Stsusua for the Los Angles Basin/Long Beam Metrepolitan Statistical Area. B. In addition to the fee noted above. and recognizing that the above noted fee will not tidly off4st additional man-hour costa. the applicant shall, prior to issuance of each Certificate of Occupancy. pay to the City an additional one -time contribution. This one• time contribution should be agreed upon by the applicant. the City Manager. City Attorney and Police Chiefl but &ball not exceed in value a fee equal to 10.5 ants per square foot of that building's ova floor area 4. Prior to issuance of each building's permit. pad a one-time library service mitigation fee of 3 cents per square foot of that building's grce& Boor area. This fee shall be adjusted annually, bepnaing January 190'1. to reflect the Consumer Price Index published by the United Stated Bureau of Labor Statistia for the Los Angles Basin/Long Beach Metropolitan Statisual Area. 5. Prior to issuance of each building's permit the applicant &hall patty to the County Sanitation District that building's sewer connection fee. 8. As required previously by Ordinance No. 1107. participate on a fw4&are basis in the coat of the trams signal interconnect and uppade project on Roseaans Avenue between Sepulveda Boulevard and Ingiewood Avenue. participation shall consist of applicant depositing a far- share amount with the City. not to escesd $10. 000, upon notification that traMc timing plea& for interconnection have bees completed and trams deal equipment has been identified. based on the project's percentage contribution to edging traffic volumes (as described in the EIIt) on Pass== Avenue between Aviaeioa and Douglas. The Department of Public Worsts shall Coordinate the timing of traf5c signal modifim#ioas to the extent feasible in order to maxizzine oat esvnWL Payment shall be made within 80 days of the City's requesL Payment &hall constitute "defection of this condition. 7. As previously required by Ordinance No. 1107, provide a bus stop and shelter immediately we Of Avian a Soulivard in c up4neum with the deceleration/right-turn lane (no separate turnoL is racommeade" to the sansfaenon of the City 'Dame Engineer. 8 As preeiooab rsgairad by Ordinance No. 1107. provide suitable ewment or dedication aad construct. a cooaete curb. gutter and 6vs46ot wide (minimum) concrete sidewalk along itessasaa Avsnne and Dotigias Street hmtagss. Walks shall connect to handicap ramps at all interseedons to satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. As previously required by Ordinance No. 1107. install a pedestrian crasmalk and pedestrian signal heads immediately to the north of the pmj*Wws Douglas Street driveway, to the es tiafacw n of the City Engineer prior to occupancy of the hotel or oma, whichever is first. 10. As previousjyd�re�by Ordinance No. 1107, boa the cost of installing emergency vehicle preemptive at the intersections of Reesaans /Aviation. Dougiss/Rosecram and a third iaterseetica to be selected jointly by the City 'hams Engineer and Fire Chiet This shall be considered the applicants fair.ahars contribution to the City's OPTICOM System and shall not exceed $18000. Payment shall be msde within so days of the City'& requesL Payment constattitea astidaction of &his condition. 1L As prwvioualy required by Ordinance No. 1107, design, construct and dedicate to the City of El Segundo a new 14 -foot wide continuous dec abration /right- sun-only lane along the north aide of Roeeaaw Avenue and the asst side of Douglas Stzvet, beginning approximately at the oastariy property line and continuing to the proposed drisewag on Douglas. The deep and spadfscsdcas shall be appavved by the City Eagmew and any dedication shall be included in the final parcel map prior to ramrdation. 12 As p vviouaiy required by Ordinance No. 1107 design and install a street lighting system along street montages to the estisfaa n of the City Engineer prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 13. Plans shall be submitted prior to issuance of the first building permit that indicate the project dn"way on either Douglas S sset or Roeeaans Avenue, or both, will be signalized subject to the requirements of the City Trams Engineer and City F.ngiaeer. Said dgnalisation shall' completed prior to issuance of the fiat Grtificate of Occupancy. 92- 1056312 4 K , 14. As previously required by Ordinance No. 1107. construct a new minimum ten -inch .eater =."= lice in Douglas Street between Rosecrans Avenue and Park Place. Replace 271 _ feet of the emoting eight -inch water main line in Rmeasns with a ten -inch water main line to :he satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15. Should conflict arise with Condition Nos. 6 through 14, inclusive, and the requuementu of Ordinance No. 1107, the provisions of Ordinance Igo. 1107 shall prevail. 16. Modify and relocate U%Mc signals and pavement striping as required by the City Traffic Engineer to accommodate the project accent and subdivision improvement@ (bond or improve). 17. Prior to issuance of each buildin`'a permit, plans shall indicate to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief that sufficient, radii will be provided to accomodate fire vehicles. Plans shall also radiate tiro vehicle access will be provided within 160 feet of the main entrance of all buildings by a public street or approved fire lane. Where adequate access is not provided on-ute fire hydrants shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Fire Chist 16. Prior to the issuance of each grading permit. the applicant &hall submit a construction traffic routing plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. which will route construction traffic away from noise sensitive areas. Construction access to the project &hall also be designed so as to minimise interference with emssing traffic and prevent truck queuing adjacent to local receptors, Construction access &hall also be designed to avoid conflicts with access to or from 760 S. Douglas Street. 19. Structures, obstructions or other private improvements &hall not be constructed within the public right- of-way as stipulated in Section 12.04.060 of the El Segundo Municipal Code. 20. All work within the public rightrof -way &hall be in accordance with the latest edition of the Standard Speciso&tions for Public Works Construction and City of D Segundo Standard Spedficatiam No work shall be performed in the public right -ofmay without first obtaining a Public Works permit. 21. Prior to issuance of a building permit all aspects of the site's sewer system. such as design. hook -up, etc are to be approved by the City Engineer. All costs assocated with the sewer system are to be borne by the applicant. 22. Each lot shall beer a apaste connection to the County Sanitation District's sanitary &ewer main. to the saaaftction of the City Engineer. 23. All saver laterals in the public righW -way shall be a minimum of cis (6) inches inside diameter. 1Hatarisl &hall be 'vitreous clay pipe'. Each lateral shall have a six (6) inch ciean- out brought to grads at the property line and seam* Dapped. A B3 on box &hall be placed around the C.O. for psoteetiom The box shall have a cover emblazoned with the word 'sewer'. If in a matte arc. aver &hall be traffic approved. (All planned sewer connections shall be checked for elafflea prior to carting coostruetioa). 24. Design and consmu t surface water drainage facilities for collection and disposal to the satisfactioa of the City Engineer. These improvements &hall be 'on♦ite' and shall be constructed prior to issuance of each Grtifiaste of Occupancy. 26. Prior to issuance of each buildiag'a permit, plans shall indicate that all existing and proposed utilities shall be placed underground to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 26- Encroaehmsnt permits must be obtained from the Public Works Department for demolition haulms Permit must be obtained at the same time the permit for demolition is issued. An eaaoeehment permit for grading is aim required when import or eaport of dirt exceeds fifty (60) cubic yards. Demolition and grading may be listed on one encroachment permit 27. Prior to seep Certificate of Occupancy ttunish and install required street signs (Lt. parking restrLcam pedestrian crosswalks. etc.) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2d Prior to isuaam of each building permit. survey boundary monuments &hall be relocated to the assidubon of the City Engineer. 29. Prior to issuance of each buildia s permit. plans shall show trash compactors and enclosures to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 30. Prior to iosuance of each buildiag's permit, plans shall show the utilization of low -flush toilets. lower - volume avatar faucets, drinking fouataias equipped with selfdosim valves. plumbing Astons which will reduce water lows from leakage duo to damaged or faulty washers and the installation of restrictions on all plumbing Axt m to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 92- 1056312 W - Fss r1r.107 31. Prior to isruanas of each Certificate of Occupancy all cracked broken. off -grade and otherwve damaged curbs. sidewalks. driveway approaches. wheel chair ramps and pavement shall be removed and rephead or repaired. lsong driveways not to be incorporated into the construction shall be removed and replaced with standard curb and sidewalk. All wort shad be to the ubstaction of the City Engineer. 32. A ash deposit or surety accepp�table to the City Attorney of $14.000 for Lot 2 and $46.000 fo Lot 3 to be retained by the for one (1) year from data of completion and acceptance b) the City Engineer. This money will be used for correcting latent street damage resulting from construction activities. All money not committed at the end of the one (1) year period shall be refunded It is the responsibility of the permittee to request refund of deposit. Said funds shall be paid to each Cartiticat@ of Occupancy. 33. Prior to issuance of each building's permit. a Are/Life Safety plan ahall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Chula indicating compliance with the Fire Prevention Bureau Standard P•1-a, Project Development Guidelines. revised October 1M, or similar guidelines in effect at that time. 34. Implement dust control measures required by the AQbM during construction. including maintaining adequate soil moisture as well as removing any mail spillage onto traveled roadways through site housekeeping procedures. 36. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the ol5ce. places shall indicate that the parking facility ventilation rates &hall comply with code requirements 36. Construction and demolition activities shall comply with the City of El Segundo Noise and Vibration Regulations Chapter 9.06. 37. Days and hours of construction activity shall comply with the provisions of the El Segundo Municipal Code. Chapter 9.06. 38. That prior to issuance of each bus'1 Ws permit plans shall indicate compliance with 'Tale 24 of the California Administrative Code. Energy Conservation. to the satisfaction of the Building Official. The project shall be designed in as energyAMdent manner ere feasible including, but not limited to, the following energy conservation measures: A) Thermal insulation in complitacs with standards established by the Stan of California (Title 24). B) Tinted Sim solar renectme glass and insulated glass shall be evaluated in the projec, design and shall be used where appropriate to reduce heating and cooling loads. B) ftwescaot lighting shall be used whom appropriate rather than less efficient lighting. C) Public area lighting, both interior and exterior, shall be time - controlled and limited to that necessary for safety and protection but shall not predude reasonable recreation and 'ambmW luting for facade and landscape enhancatnents D) Lighting switches and multi-switch provisions for control by occupants and building poesounal shall be used to permit optimum energy conservation. 39. During coustructim a project sit@ shall be enlaced by a sot-foot high chain link fence. Gates shall be located at drivewgs and shall not open out over sidewalk /puhhe right -of -.way. No meterisl storage is allowed in the public rigbW -wq except by permit issued by the Public Works Dep utmsnt. 40. Site development shall comply with the following development standards: Parmittad ilssa Land uses shall be limited to business parks. research and development facilities. commercial offices , Residence Inn with btchea fadlitisa or a full same* hotel. reetaum ts. and retail sales and services. Plow Area„Ratin, As deflaed by E S u C. Section 20.08.19& floor area shall not exceed the total square footage of the net paraal. esduding dedication for deceleration and acceleration lanes No tender of building area between parcels is allowed. $lbJL Structures shall not eme a height of 84 feet. ae defined in E.S.MC- Section 20.08. 080. The parking structure shall not exneed ma stories, above grads, except that additional stories oompied by recreational uses may be located within the parking structure, not to exceed 64 fiat m height 92 -1OW12 6 ; ` ; A minimum of 20% of the total Square footage of each lot shall be devoted to landscaped open space. For purposes of this requirement, open apace ahall mean arw w$►c are landscaped. open air amenities to the public including the proposed residence mn:hotel Pool area and surrounding courtyard Surface parkins lore, interior roadways, penthouses. paved plaza www and areas provided on rooftops do not constitute open Space. Meandenng pedestrian walkways up to 6 feet in width may be included in open space, subject to approve: by the Director of Planning. Roseerana Avenue Frontagae Along Roeecrans Avenue a fully landscaped and maintained yard of 30 feet =assured from the property line abutting Roeeaaas Avenue after any dedication. Donglas Street Frontage Along Douglas Street, Lot No. 2 &hall have a fully landscaped and maintained yard of 26 feet measured from the property line abutting Douglas Street after any dedication. empt that the southerly one-third of the setback area may be reduced to 10 -feet to &oaommo& open parking spaces. Lot No. 3 &ball have a fully landscaped and maintained yard of 26 feet measured from the property line abutting Douglas Street after any dedication. Santa Fe Railway Right-Of-War. Along the nartb♦asterly property line of the proposed subdivision. (adjoining the Santa Fe Railway► right-ot -M), a yard area of not less than 20 feet &W be maintained This area may be used for An Lana, pedestrian bridge to the proposed light rail station. landsap' .:eeseetion, open parking &paaa or such other purposes as approved by the Director of Plaaaiag. Interior Private Driveway: A yard of not leg& than 10 feet measured from the curb line of the interior private driveway. This area aball be landscaped and maintained. and shall include a pedestrian tidswalk. Interior Lot Liners All other interior property limas separating Lots L 2 and 3 &hall have no setback requirement Setback areas @hall be Hilly landscaped except for the following intrusions: Pedestrian bridged walkway. recreational amenities. LndseePini Unpin requirements shall be m► follows: Ladaoapiag far the purposes of this section &ball amiss of trees, shrubs. vices. bushes. nowers. ground oovenap, or any combination thereof Landscaping ahall cad Consist of artificial plants or tat ljmdsaqdM va road says = shall eom* with Section 20. 0� drives and all other p0. All landscaped area shall be provided with pormment -Moring facilities. All landscaped arm shall be permanently maintained in a neat. dean and healthy condition. This &ball include proper pruning. mowing of lawn& weeding. removal of litter, fertilising and replmoamsnt of Pima when necessary. Drought tolerant piano and landscaping material shall be utilized All lot development ahall be regulated as follows Electrical. telaphone. CAT.V. and similar service wires or cables which provide direct service to the property being developed within the esxartor boundary lines of such property, shall be iastallad underground. Risers on palm and buildinp are permitted and shall be provided by the developer or owner onto the pole which provides service to said peopeety. Utility mvim poles may be placed on the rear of the property to be develoPed only for the Purpose of te""• • ,*+• underground halitlaa The developer or owner is ngmn$"@ for complying with the requirements at tbia section mad shall make the necessary arrangements with the utility companies for the installatim of such facilities, Appurtsnsu,cm and associated equipment such as. but not limited to, sorties mounted awdormem pedestal mounted terminal bows and meter abineta. sprinkler manifolds . and concealed duos in an underground systems may be placed above ground providing such appurtenances and associated equipment are screened from view in a similar manner as set forth in Section 20.36.140(2). All vents, pipes and similar deviw which are snacked to the building aball be o .3 92- 1056312 painted to match the building. Said appurtenances and associated equipment and screening &hall not be located and /or screened so as to be visible from the public rsghaof -cop. Meebanid equipment installed on roolteps &hall be attractively screened from new. The height of such screening shall meet the maamum height of sue equipment. A storage area for cartons. containers and trash shall be provided and shielded from view within each building or within an area enclosed by a wall on each lot, the size and location su>lject to the approval of the Director of Planning and City Engineer. 41. Prior to issuance of each building permit. submit a Tandem and Irrigation Plan, subject to approval by the Director of Planing. Director of Recreation and Paris. and Chief of Police. The project's irrigation system shall be automated and sball be operated and maintained to dispense water emaently so dietated by a program designed to satisfy the variety of needs of the project's plant materials Said plan shall indices, as a minimum. the following: A. Ladsaping around the perimeter of the project that highlights architectural features in terms of tecure and color so well as buffering the site from adjacent properties. B. Street trees planted in accordance with City's street tree planting standards including root barrier protection requirements. C. Information indicating the location specific type, and size of landscaping materials proposed- D. The utilization of automatic landscape watering systems. & That all open zaw not used for buildings, surface parking lots. interior road+rsys. penthouses. paced plaza areas. walla. recreation areas and areas provided on rooftops. shall be attrectiively landscaped F. The use of treew shrubs, vines. bushes. Gomm ground coverings, or any combination thervaL The use of artificial plants or turf is not permitted G. Landscaping at intersecdons of sweks. ally's. "private drives and all other vehicula- roadwys &ball comps with Section 20.68.000. IL Drought teiaant planks and landscaping material &hall be utilized. All Lndsc&ped areas shaII be permanently maintained in a nest. dean and healthy condition. This Shall iadnde proper penaiiog, momiag of Owns, weeding, removal of liver. fertilizing and repiSOement of planks when aeaseaa:y. 42. Prior to issuance of sack permit a lisbiisot plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Planning sad raw Chist no _plan abali indicate the looadon. mean and intensity of all lighting. As a mbWawm, lighting around the parking lot shall bs 1 foot candle minimum maintained for personal and vehicle sa ty. Low intensity lighting shall be used xte throughout the erior of the project to the degree faeable. 43. Priw to usuasim of sub building permit. a sae --- plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Police Chief As a minimum, the plan shall inoosporate the following meemnis: A. Each building shall be oddreated by a numeral ee letter, a minimum of 6 inches in height, of contrasting color to the background and clearly visible from the street, paring and waDrwgs The number or letter Shall be i ummatad during dark hours and those numbers or letters should correspond with those on the directory nap. L Pod sad spa shSU be barred for safety and visibiifoty. Hours far usage and pool rules shaft be posted. C. All main entry doors to the suites shaft be at &did con construction with a minimum thiekaaas of 1.1/4 inches thick. D. A panoramic door views (180.190) shall be installed in the main entry door for each hotel suits. E. Each main entry door shall have a deadbott with a 1 inch protect= The eyhnt guard shaft be of eve hardened steel, with the outer edge angled or tapered and fr. 92- 1056312 a KW ^, �� spsaninj The eaerior part of the lock &hall be connected to the umde poruoa of tye lock with bolts at least 1/4 inch in diameter and constructed of steel. The iocL=g mechanism should contain a minimum of a 6 pin tumbler. F Main entry doors with Mass constructed in or within 40 inches (including w mdown alocg side entry door) of the locking mechanism &hall use a double cylinder deadbolt wnth a retaining key feature Q$ reverse the swing of the door Q$ reverse the pouuon of the window. G. Strikeplate &hall be made with a heavy metal and mounted with a minimum of 4 -1,2 inch screws off-eet fL First story windows and sliding glass doors for the hotel &hall have a secondary locking device to insure against burglary. L Addressing for each hotel suite shall be a minimum of 4 inches in height, of contrasting color to the background and clear and visibla for emergency purposes. J. A site directory map shall be posted by entrance(s) to indicate awes and locations for suits, this would be used for emergency response of Police, Fire and Paramedics. 44. Prior to installation. each project shall submit a Sign Plan to ensure compatibility with surrounding arm and the aesthetic objectives of the General Plan. as well a. to ensure the signs do not impede traffic or pedestrian safety. Said sago► plan shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. 46. Prior to issuance of a&& building permit, the appiiaat shall mthmit to the Director of Planning and Director of Recreation and Parka for review and approval. a recreation plan that complies with the CiWe Industrial Development Recreation Standards and Guidelines. dated January 2. 1667. 46. Prior to issuance of each building permit the developer /applicant &hall submit to the Director of Planaiag and City Tie Engineer for approval. plaza which demonstrate compliance vnth Chapter 20AL Developer Tvazspottation System Management In addition to the minimum requirements cited in Chapter 20.6b. the plan shall incorporate provisions for employee showers. lockers and bicycle parking arms. Construction of the physical facilities required by the approved plan shall be completed prior to Certificate, of Occupancy. 47. Prior to issuance of a business license, so & prRjetyt]�tnazt shall submit t the Director of Chapter 20.61. Employer /Dotipeat for rom $7stems Management. oompliaace wrath 46. Prior to the imuzce of a building permit for both Lob 2 and S. plaza shall show to the satisfaction of &a Dbradw of Planning that a minimum of 166 on-site parking spaces will be provided for the rssidsom inn/ hotel. and a minimum of 667 on-aw parking spaces is a parking structm wM be prodded for the ofilaa buil ding. Said parkmg spaces shall be permanently maintained and may not be reduced by titrther lot line adjustments6 shared parking agreements with other propertiao, eta Parking along the mtrior driveway shall be prohibited. 46. Prior to the issuance of seep building permit plaza shall show the use of minimally - reflective glass and all other materials used on the building's esae w should be selected with attention to mizimiszg reflective glare. 60. Prior to ies ante of a building permit for either Lot 2 or Lot & the applicant shall submit to the Director of p�MPlaaaing for administrative rniew md� Beal plaza indict. substantial C with the development standards and of approval imposed by this ilea lution and the Development Agreement The Director of Planning shall circulate the plans to appropriate City WC /departments for approvaL Significant changes, as determined by the Director of Planning, shall be submitted to the Planning Comm —on for Anal review and approval. 6L Prior to isuaz s of =W building permit a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Diredor at Planning. Said plan &hall moospmate a requirement that m building permit will be issued for the ofiScs buildmg prior to permits bang Wowed for the residence ion/hotel and substantial cozst umm progress mode. Said plan shall *–,A * to appropriate and specific provisions ensuring that all required fees, plam and tmprtvemezts will be complied with. 52 The developer shall raooed reopsecal easement agreemants to share and maintain common fire/life safety systems as required by the Fin Chief prior to oaupancy of the Brat building. 92 -10W12 6 -�n i2w 1� S ,141 53. 'lie Development A&mment shall be revised to incorporate prMunans prvvidms tha. the rights putad by this approval mw not be tra srrsd from Continental Deveiopment Corporation to any other entity. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this M day of Naveiher. loom Carl Jacobson. Mwor City of E Segundo �.. m ,� A �� - - 92 -10W12 TA•XWM ZO -� z K4�^^ AGENDA ITEM -July 7, 1998 - Unfinished Business Council appointment to fill City Treasurer vacancy. Recommendation - Discussion and possible action. 0 4� EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 7, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Staff Response to Request for Alternate Staffing for a Centralized Procurement Function. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: City Council direct the Human Resources Department to identify a class specification that will provide the position needed in the Finance Department, Business Services Division, to support the centralization of the City's purchasing function. This position will support purchasing and the management of the City's contracts. This management will include insurance compliance monitoring, business license compliance and the review of contracts to maintain same in a current position. This action will result in a modification of the City Clerk's 1998 -99 budget by moving the funds for the Office Specialist II position to the Business Services Division. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: In August, 1994, the Purchasing Agent position was eliminated in a city -wide staff reduction. At that time, the purchasing function was decentralized, relying upon departmental staff to initiate all purchasing requests and monitor contract expirations and renewals, and compliance with terms and conditions. The Budget Analyst /Accountant together with other members of the accounting staff assumed support duties to assist the departments in processing bids and contract awards. With the adoption of the 1998 -99 budget, the Council referred to staff the question of how contract management functions and procurement responsibilities could be combined. DISCUSSION: A recent management audit of the Finance Department recommended the establishment of a Business Services Division within the department. The responsibilities of the division include business license tax administration, purchasing and budgeting. Purchasing as envisioned in the recommendation remained de- centralized. However, in reviewing the report with the consultants, it was felt improved efficiencies and dollar savings would result from centralizing this activity. Doing so will reduce the workload within each of the City's departments but not so much that positions could be reduced. The City Clerk included in her 1998 -99 budget a position to manage the City's contracts. The duties envisioned by the Clerk are described in the attached memo. Combining duties described by the Clerk with centralized purchasing activities in the Business Services Division would allow for centralized purchasing and contract management utilizing the single position requested by the City Clerk. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget: Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required - Yes_ No_ Date: June 30, 1998 Ja s W. Morrison, City M AC MN TAKEN: purchase.stf 9 14 ,. EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 7, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Staff Response to Request for Alternate Staffing for a Centralized Procurement Function This is a supplement to the Staff report by Finance Following City Council approval during the FY1998 -99 budget process, of a full -time Office Specialist II position in the City Clerk's Department, Staff has begun the preliminary process of importing current Contract and Insurance records into a more efficient data base system. This will enable staff to track expiration dates of contracts, current business licensing and insurance coverage for all current contracts. Additionally, the City Clerk's Staff has been, and will continue to work closely with appropriate Finance Department Staff. This ensures that both departments are aware of any discrepancies in contract compliance and offers a check and balance system which reduces the opportunity for expiration dates to fall through the cracks. Contract administration is the second phase in the City's move towards electronic monitoring of all City records. As Council is aware, this Department is in the process of electronically codifying the City's Municipal and Zoning Codes This process is anticipated to be completed by Summer, 1999. The next major phase in this Department's move towards the electronic management of City records will be the computerization of minutes for all City Council meetings from Incorporation to- date. All available minutes are computerized from 1990 to -date; however, from Incorporation through 1990 minutes will require to go through a scanning process which is very labor intensive, particularly the older, typewritten records. The benefits of this process to the City residents, Council and Staff are enormous. Weeks and months of Staff research time will be reduced to minutes. We perceive the next phase in this process to be the scanning of all Resolutions and Ordinances. Again, this is a heavily labor intensive process. However, again, the benefits to everyone are immense. For your information, Staff has made some preliminary inquiries into the cost of contracting this work out. Since the City was incorporated in 1917, and has many thousands of old documents to be scanned, the cost of contracting this work would be prohibitive, and would still require a great deal of Staff involvement in preparing documents for codification, such as photocopying, etc. C145 Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk ril EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 7, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Commissions, Committees & Boards (CCBs) AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Vacancies on Planning Commission and Community Cable Advisory Committee. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: a) Re -open recruitment for one vacancy on Planning Commission; b) Continue the term of Commissioner Charles O'Hearn until candidate is appointed; C) Open recruitment for one vacancy on Community Cable Advisory Committee; d) Advertise the positions pursuant to established procedure, with filing deadline to be set for 5:00 p.m., two days (48 hours) prior to Interviews of candidates. e) Schedule date of Interviews. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The following are the positions on the various CCBs for which this recruitment process is necessary: Commissions, Committees & Boards # of Vacancies Term Planning Commission 1 position June 30, 1998 Community Cable Advisory Committee 1 position October 31, 1998 DISCUSSION: Information regarding the specific duties and qualifications of these Commissions /Committees /Boards and their members, as well as application forms, will be made available at the Council Office, the City Clerk's Office, Chamber of Commerce, Joslyn Center and the El Segundo Library. Interested candidates are invited to file an application as soon as possible. All candidates will be interviewed by the City Council on a date to be announced. Applications must be filed at City Council offices by 5:00 p.m., two days (48 hours) prior to interviews. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None FISCAL IMPACT: NIA ORIGINATED: Date: June 26, 1998 Julia Abreu Mason, Council Assistant REVIEWED BY: Date: June 26, 1998 A (,o C1..,✓,u� W. Morrison, Cit TAKEN: joa: n:\ccb \forms \recru it.698 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 7, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Boards & Commissions AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Report and status of needed improvements at Park Vista Senior Housing and process put in place to accomplish Master Maintenance Plan. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Master Maintenance Plan and process to accomplish stated projects. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The City Council requested, as part of the budget process, staff to identify what improvements need to be accomplished at Park Vista to bring the facility up to acceptable standards. As a result, City Council also authorized the Senior Housing Board to spend $300,000 from their reserve accounts to make necessary improvements. City Council also authorized loaning up to $113,000 to the Senior Housing Board if improvements exceed the authorized $300,000. DISCUSSION: At the Senior Housing Board meeting held on June 24, the Board took the following action related to the Park Vista master maintenance plan. Approved Master Maintenance Plan of needed improvements for Park Vista. 2. Established following process: (a) The management company initiate necessary action to accomplish all identified improvements. (b) The management company work with, and request the direct assistance from the City Public Works department as necessary to expedite and coordinate building repairs and major maintenance. To accept loan offer from City Council up to $113,000 to accomplish repairs, if necessary. (Terms to any loan to be determined if and when a loan is needed.) 4. Request City Council to guarantee that funds will be made available to Park Vista for major repairs, in the event funds are not available in Park Vista reserve accounts. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Master Maintenance Plan for Park Vista Senior Housing . 2. Cost breakdown of Park Vista Senior Housing Improvements. FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget: Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required - Yes_ No ORI;a: IN D- Date: June 25, 1998 Jim irec o� REVIEWED BY:/-\ Date: James W. Mor son Ci t' ACTION TAK N- 980707.pv 062698 12:OOam /` (/Jai- yva� Manager -7// /If c ♦4 1 MHiNIENaN(_L lu JIQ" i'Uyll JUN 19'98 1317 No.002 P.01 (fil y 4c..A , agundo INTER - DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE Date: June 19, 1998 To: Jim Fauk, Recreation and Parks Director From: John W. Hilton, General Services Manager Subject: Park Vista Senior Housing Following are recommendations for the Master Maintenance Plan for Park Vista Senior Housing. 1. Repair lighted EXIT sign located on fourth floor. 2. Provide Annual Fire Alarm System Test certification. 3. Replace inspector's test valve handle on standpipe, fifth floor, stair 6. 4. Provide evacuation maps near every elevator on all floors. 1. Plumbing gravity vent is too close to the furnace vent on roof 3 (fumes and vapors are able to infiltrate the building). 2. Sump pump piping should not be exposed to the elements. Box in and terminate the vent properly. 3. Public area restrooms: A. Install lever controls for water. B. Wrap under lavatory piping. C. Clear tank area of decorations so there is access to the grabbers. D. Grabber bar behind the toilet should be 36 inches long, the current bar is 24 inches long. Mnt1b 9MWrWnlot "rk40.w G 01 US NH 1:NItNHNt,t .L•.�. JUN 1y'08 13;17 No.002 P.02 Park Vista Senior Housing June 19, 1998 Page 2 E. install a soap dispenser, at a maximum 49 inches above floor level. 4. Laundry room: A. Counter height should be a maximum of 34 inches above floor level. B. Install lever hardware in the sink. C. Wrap the pipes under the sink. 5. Interior handrail is set at ± 32 inches above finished floor throughout. It should be 34 -38 inches above floor level. & A small shed has been constructed to house emergency water. The shed is not built in a code compliant manner. How often is the water exchanged? 7. Regarding request to eliminate /alter BW vents on the fifth floor deck: A. The vents meet City code. Will talk with manufacturer to see if they have a listed product to convert four vents into one. B. Still will require "dog house" for vent termination. 8. See attachments for handicapped requirements. A. Public areas are accessible. B. Units are adaptable. �1- I : Z.] 11KA11 I I H-01:101 • 1. Trees (All problems stated below will be handled by the Board this fall with the assistance of Recreation and Parks Department referrals.) A. Removal of two pine trees on bottom patio, planted too close to apartments. B, Remove existing diseased trees in patio area and replace with new trees. C. Remove Liquid Amber planted in outside planter on southeast of facility. The tree is cracking the planter due to overcrowding of trees. 2. Shut -off valves for entire building. CHMA Maintenance staff confirmed that there are now eight shut -off valves and all are in good working order. 3. Second floor deck: A. Steps need antiskid tape. B. Handrail should be extended 12 inches beyond the last (bottom) step. MrVcQW*dm1ri* arkv O,* 0149 MHiNIENHN�,t 1L, -. IV1.111V>11 .JUN 19'98 1317 No.002 P.03 Park Vista Senior Housing June 19, 1998 Page 3 4. Northwest corner of the building, 4 inch PVC pipe needs to be 12 inches below ground. 5. Blinds located outside of the Social Room: the rope needs to be secured correctly. 6. Irrigation control box located in the southwest corner: needs to be replaced as it is very rusty. i. All of the corridor fire exit doors need to be adjusted so they will latch correctly, 8. The Ilght fixtures located in the trash chute and custodial rooms need to have light diffusers on each. 9. All the drinking fountains located in the corridors need to be repaired. 10. Several exit signs need to be remounted correctly. 11. Roof: all seams need to be resealed. 12. Second floor deck: A. Remove planters and fountain. Parks to remove plants and planters, Maintenance to remove and seal off electrical connection. B. Sloping from south entrance /exit door to garage area causes ponding outside of apartment 203. Apartment 203 has extreme leaking problems due to the second floor ponding. Recommend resurfacing and sealing of the deck, and possibly raising the door. 13. Third floor deck- water damage to interior walls in apartment 318, near the sliding glass door, from the fifth floor deck. 12. First Floor: A. Double glass doors (2 sets) need to be repaired so they will close correctly. S. Ceiling located in front lobby has water damage and needs to be repaired. 13. Second Floor: A. Elevator room located in the garage needs a vent on the door. B. Storage room located in the garage needs to be cleaned, use of the room as a carpenter shop should be discontinued. k"fCWWmint "*vW 3,Wc i`HIAitNHN�,L ii)•ai0'41-1v�11 JUN 19'98 1318 No.002 P.04 Park Vista Senior Housing June 19, 1998 Page 4 C. The Electrical Room located in the garage needs to be cleaned, and a 36 inch clearance maintained in front of all electrical panels. 14. Third Floor: A. Exit door from exercise room to the roof does not latch correctly and is showing a lot of rust B. 3'xT ceiling access door located in the hallway is not sealed correctly. C. Exercise room light fixtures needs light diffusers. D Southeast window screen needs to be repaired. E. Room 311 deck is chipped and needs to be resealed. There are 2x4s placed at the edge of the wall to stop water from entering into it. This should be repaired correctly. F Ceiling located by the southeast elevator is cracked and needs to be repaired. G. The stairway wall between the third and fourth floor is cracking. H. Air- conditioning in third floor corridor: to be determined. 15. Fourth Floor: A. Window screen needs to be repaired. B. Windowsill is pealing paint. 16. Fifth Floor: A. Stairway door #3 needs to have more clearance at the bottom of the door. B Southeast corridor needs an approved access door. C. Roof exit door is showing rust. IT Garage leaks /cracks - underneath second floor deck: A. CHMA maintenance had cut out from the second floor deck, indicating 10 inches of concrete used for decking. B. Signs indicating leakage on the ceiling of the garage could be from the second floor deck, or from plumbing lines along the ceiling in the garage. Recommend sealing the second floor deck and checking the exposed plumbing in the garage. MrA(cU ftftInI%I"rkr q.ao ;:OiSt city o/ ase yundo INTER - DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE Date: June 29, 1998 To: Jim Fauk, Recreation and Parks Director !yam From: John W. Hilton, General Services Manager /Y Subject: Park Vista Senior Housing Cost Breakdown of Park Vista Improvements 1. Rehabilitation of three (3) decks: Second floor deck $ 25,000.00 Third floor deck 15,000.00 Fifth floor deck 50,000.00 2. Exterior water sealing investigation: (Park Vista, all inclusive) Leak investigation 5,000.00 Report development 1,000.00 Specification development 3,000.00 Repairs necessary after destructive leak investigation 1,000.00 3. Exterior painting: Painting 80,000.00 Building preparation (based on water sealing investigation) 10,000.00 4. Structure modifications: Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) modifications to handrails 50,000.00 ADA modifications to restrooms and laundry room 3,000.00 5. Miscellaneous in -house maintenance items which are beyond the capability of CHMA staff. Scope to be determined through meetings with CHMA. $ 90, 000.00 10, 000.00 53, 000.00 20, 000.00 Total $263,000.00 Mntfc1981administ\parkvst3. idc �i0 15 ? Park Vista Senior Housing June 29, 1998 Page 2 Following are recommendations for the Master Maintenance Plan for Park Vista Senior Housing. All recommendations are in addition to the regular maintenance plans and replacement schedule. Fire /Life Safety Inspection Repair lighted EXIT sign located on fourth floor. 2. Provide Annual Fire Alarm System Test certification. 3. Replace inspector's test valve handle on standpipe, fifth floor, stair 6. 4. Provide evacuation maps near every elevator on all floors. Plumbing gravity vent is too close to the furnace vent on roof 3 (fumes and vapors are able to infiltrate the building). 2. Sump pump piping should not be exposed to the elements. Box in and terminate the vent properly. 3. Public area restrooms: A. Install lever controls for water. B. Wrap under lavatory piping. C. Clear tank area of decorations so there is access to the grabbers. D. Grabber bar behind the toilet should be 36 inches long, the current bar is 24 inches long. E. Install a soap dispenser, at a maximum 49 inches above floor level. 4. Laundry room: A. Counter height should be a maximum of 34 inches above floor level. B. Install lever hardware in the sink. C. Wrap the pipes under the sink. 5. Interior handrail is set at + 32 inches above finished floor throughout. It should be 34 -38 inches above floor level. Handrails do not provide acceptable gripping surface. Maintenance Inspection Exterior Trees (All problems stated below will be handled by the Board this fall with the assistance of Recreation and Parks Department referrals.) A. Removal of two pine trees on bottom patio, planted too close to apartments. MntfcQ8\administ\parWst3. idc n n 1 h Park Vista Senior Housing June 29, 1998 Page 3 B. Remove existing diseased trees in patio area and replace with new trees. C. Remove Liquid Amber planted in outside planter on southeast of facility. The tree is cracking the planter due to overcrowding of trees. D. Parks to remove plants and planters from second floor deck 2. Second floor deck: A. Steps need antiskid tape. B. Handrail should be extended 12 inches beyond the last (bottom) step. C. Sloping from south entrance /exit door to garage area causes ponding outside of apartment 203. Apartment 203 has extreme leaking problems due to the second floor ponding. Recommend resurfacing and sealing of the deck, and possibly raising the door. D. Garage leaks /cracks - underneath second floor deck: Signs indicating leakage on the ceiling of the garage could be from the second floor deck, or from plumbing lines along the ceiling in the garage. Recommend sealing the second floor deck and checking the exposed plumbing in the garage. E. Remove fountain. 3. Third floor deck: A. Water damage to interior walls in apartment 318, near the sliding glass door, from the fifth floor deck. B. Storefront door from deck to north hallway is leaking. 4. Fifth floor deck: Water is ponding and leaking into the fifth floor hallway and fourth floor apartments below. 5. Northwest corner of the building, 4 inch PVC pipe needs to be 12 inches below ground. 6. Blinds located outside of the Social Room: the rope needs to be secured correctly. 7. Irrigation control box located in the southwest corner: needs to be replaced as it is very rusty. 8. All of the corridor fire exit doors need to be adjusted so they will latch correctly. 9. The light fixtures located in the trash chute and custodial rooms need to have light diffusers on each. 10. All the drinking fountains located in the corridors need to be repaired. 11. Several exit signs need to be remounted correctly. 12. Roof: Flashing on parapet walls, seams need to be resealed. Mntfc198%admiNsttparkvst3.idc .: (101 r- � Park Vista Senior Housing June 29, 1998 Page 4 Interior 13. First Floor: A. Double glass doors (2 sets) need to be repaired so they will close correctly. B. Ceiling located in front lobby has water damage and needs to be repaired. 14. Second Floor: A. Elevator room located in the garage needs a vent in the door. B. The Electrical Room located in the garage needs to be cleaned, and a 36 inch clearance maintained in front of all electrical panels. 15. Third Floor: A. Exit door from exercise room to the roof does not latch correctly and is showing a lot of rust. B. 3'x3' ceiling access door located in the hallway is not sealed correctly. C. Exercise room light fixtures needs light diffusers. D. Southeast window screen needs to be repaired. E. Room 311 deck is chipped and needs to be resealed. There are 2x4s placed at the edge of the wall to stop water from entering into it. This should be repaired correctly. F. Ceiling located by the southeast elevator is cracked and needs to be repaired. G. The stairway wall between the third and fourth floor is cracking. 16. Fourth Floor (In -house personnel): A. Window screen needs to be repaired. B. Windowsill is pealing paint. 17. Fifth Floor: A. Stairway door #3 needs to have more clearance at the bottom of the door. B. Southeast corridor needs an approved access door. C. Roof exit door is showing rust. Mntfd96\administ\parkvst3. idc 015 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA DESCRIPTION: MEETING DATE: July 7, 1998 AGENDA HEADING: Boards and Commissions Approve sale of monthly ($32.00) and annual ($365.00) golf green fee passes to El Segundo residents for the Lakes at El Segundo Golf Course. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve sale of monthly and annual golf passes. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The golf course sub - committee recently referred to the Recreation and Parks Commission for consideration, the sale of monthly and annual golf passes to El Segundo residents for play at the Lakes. The commission took action at their June meeting to recommend to City Council a monthly and annual green fee pass be made available to El Segundo residents, at a fee of $32 for monthly and $365 for an annual green fee pass. DISCUSSION: Staff surveyed twenty -seven golf courses in Southern California to reference how green fee passes are administered. As a result of this survey and other discussion, the commission recommends the following guidelines be placed on the sale and use of passes: 1. Passes available for El Segundo residents use only; 2. Passes will be sold only at the Recreation and Parks Department; 3. Those purchasing passes must possess a Recreation Park I.D. card; 4. Passes are not transferable, only the person identified on pass (with Rec I. D. Photo permitted;) 5. Passes can only be used on weekdays, no weekends or holidays; 6. Cost of passes will not be prorated; sold for the calendar year and for a specific month. The determination of the cost for monthly passes was based on a resident playing one round of golf per week, which was consistent with monthly passes offered at other golf courses. The annual pass cost was figured by discounting the monthly pass equivalent by 5 percent. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: FISCAL IMPACT: J ACTiOp TAKEN: AIS- 980707.gc 062998 10:30am �D BY: '. Morrison, City Manage (Check one) Operating Budget: Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required - Yes_ No Date: June 29, 1998 Date: 15 JJN.80.199E 8 :57AM LOGICON RDA (810)645 2558 FAX COVER SHEET Number of pages 2-including this cover page) TO: Name MARLENE BAKER FAX No. 310- 322 -7137 FROM: Name LIZ G ARNHOLZ FAX No. 310 - 645 -2553 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: NO. 782 P.1 Date: Tue, dun 30, 1998 Location CITY MGR OFFICE Phone /Ext. No. 310. 607 -2226 Location LOGICON RDA Phone /Ext. No. 310- 645 -1122 EXT 545 July 7, 1998, Council Meeting, Committees and Commissions Progress report by the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Committee, ASNAC, on Project Early Turns. Introduction and application of Charles DeDeurwaerder for ASNAC membership. ACTION TO BE TAKEN Council confirmation of C. Dedeurwaerder for membership to the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Committee, NOTICE OF CONFIDENT;ALiTY' The information contained in this transmission is confidential and intended on.y for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of tlus message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, duplication, or dissemination of this communication or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission i iu error, please notify us iu mediately to arrange for the return of the orizinal transmission to us. I IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL BACK IMMEDIATELY ',0i5W ow. all, co 10 r.11 N co all, Co -41 C> ro (0 ;C; 'o r%j pi cp. I,.. in'. ty, un -4 U, -J, 10 C, Ln CI`• tom -4 L4 ro ,I w c, <> '.n o I; - 1 ur, c. knI cy, -4 M <1 r . C, 'o > > m m wit: 1 �J I to 13, n m n I-q �o 0 f 0 a 010 0 -41 '"n "3 -4 x I i n C X A -, -h I+ Z -4 > �u m ICn c 7 -4 m M> z > 4 ro -4 0 a. - Di 0 -1 0 -% . 0 'n -.4 m N 'o -n a j M;u o < -nI 11 In u a 0 0) r-> ro > la 1 Ul o r = w 4+'N 0) CD:cl -1's. "0 1,4 ; I m I'm 10 M Cc z to lom n -j go oo o 0 '1 o In Im a- 0 7, > 01 m M a I, m "I C+ a '1 0 0) 3 3, v M 0 z m I. > -4 -j cyitn h: w- - 0 a in Z Z C> jo C> C> !<> Q CD, • n c a • -3 r - A. 'a to M 'V c 1 :7 0 -) M --4 CO w ro ro Ln --J (7, .4:N - D IV C. I IM 11111 C .0 0 3 010 3 OL 1< go c P, 0 �Im c :5 c .0 IF, 1- :13 !rD 1. 9 r > -3 it- M (A 3 ir., 3; 4, In to 0 0 S -0 r< m 41 0 > "0 b 11 .1 IA "I A IV Is 0 �V 'I n A or 1111. V Do n 0 -C 0 n D 0 1 12 40 :33 C) 1 f. to 7 IT In 0 c -1 0 0 7 -3 oirn m r- ir -n r) Im m -v -v Ir, cix x - > > >!-I 0 M'M 0 V110 m a val -A 'v > 1-4 0 "V "S :1 0.0 3 i0 'v1 Z V M fit n -r C, r) C, D I'D 0 M M WIM - -Im M T T 2 m10 rr 'D w 1A :-4 -t,- Z Z -'M r -4: X, 71 ;;1V 0 In IQ- 0. 1 01 "In op IBM - T.1 c ju, 0 n1n Ln r- I -I >:`- �: MI> > -IC --I r,!o 0 r� m -nI3, r- I a r" 0 0 11 - r I'D 10 1 It. -1" i Wm-, -4 - IZ C z. < 0;- < e . :0 64 w x r n n - m 'a �v a -1 m 'a 41) 1-% a C, CL :5 c 0 ir- r, -C IT) �; :1 2 .4 1" IM m:rfl MIM m (P 1 0 M r- '7110 c 0 a, 0 3 -11 0 IM m -1 D O. -3 In ::r M > M Z) c lu < 0 o In 10 r. > z IM C; 6 3 310 ul 0 'CL OP 7 In r, -1 Im .4 00 A. cr -1 'b Ib -) r" c c C I'D'(" .00 C n �n 'M'l> N -" 0 4- '4 :1 - C 0. 10 LA r fTl Cn (j, ;o c 0 n M17) ++ -5 or ou w 4. V)I- --4 >1C --4 3 1:! r 0M'-;MM Ib A 3 IT 41 1, .4 :0 15 ck. I, z z M > T --I a 0 < CIA m :) -% a -1 '11 'n 0 a z I -1 1 > o -n - 11 o :1 3 0 < a -%I- M c c Im --41Z 'h V C: U. n+ cr < 7 Ul D NI-- In -I" C z z >z cr III CL 01 1A -11 r IT, 0, nic 0000 ;� -n 'n z 2 (3 2: In C 0 z Y. 1012 10 :1 n I 1:0 1 z z 'n z In 91 14 1:3�10 c I 11+ 0 or 'I a I" C. m Im c i I z < I - 0 0 4. 11 F - In In ,*I. 1 :T• :) . 13 , ,,, --4 IM V T < r 1, 1. .1 :1 17 Dr, rr, m 7 -) 0 "1 A (. C IT, 2- r 3 a D IR w In 1-0 111. n Ik• -- 0 0 '. I) IS, 9 M !� 17, z:: � I m 2 1 C, " , c I 'n _71 rn m 1 c N LX U. I) m U 'n rl .1 71 to Z m > I I 5 I r P in C4 C C, z "n 4 ro N -A 0 41 &- C, V ow. all, co 10 r.11 N co all, Co -41 C> ro (0 ;C; 'o r%j pi cp. I,.. in'. ty, un -4 U, -J, 10 C, Ln CI`• tom -4 L4 ro ,I w c, <> '.n o I; - 1 ur, c. knI cy, -4 M <1 r . C, 'o > > m m wit: 1 J 1 i x N V G. r .- •�w »I• M 7 r m yr V 7 y •IO I� �' �• r f 7 � • n M » C K 7 r • 7 • to 7 •, r .Y 7 n 0 7 1 L , to I> 1 1 T ' I I , I I ' 1 i p I riv v n � -� • rla n I Iv 7Ir 7 CIO / N,7 O IY 1--c O v•• v K v 0.3 �o ovinc N'7 w 71a K •1 » 1m w »N•KC• O ►+ » V - • aM '1 7,v r n • » r r• K oln » 7 goo 7 wiz ■ 710 -S r# 0 • n r• w 7 Y M!7 7 w..- 7 -3 4 c w• m » »6 !•�N 1 tf e n Y -0. Y � 1 +awn '1 r» 1� µr.•c »• V+ o Nr Kl c v a < w' n n ►' • V w; 9 • K f r O 1• «.•1 O m • . 7 c r V 7 < Y o 3 3 7 4O Ylv w -310 r ri • .1 • »In 1- w • YI• N VC 7 KI or %C 3- 's 0 I OIr A D!• • NIK A -� -I+o771N•ylw•- » 1r » • tT<I70 N rinQrl•7 c -0 Y VI +• <7n, N n y a —n 010 c 7 • M w + • - » a • A <9 »r M• IK .• 3c • Y » 7 VI N N NIL►- Ynw•'2v 77 T o r »ir c ••n3 w;77 7 a •.N K10. N r l •` < I lO + r O N r nl• 0 • » Y 7 w c N • r e l m r + L Y r ► aJ n 7 7 17n l0 7 I rlx a di -5 c'7 c »Im VIA w OIr 10 IK • • O .1 rn y -I lv o;o w:III o c • IK • 7 7 0 7 nA �•• ✓••K 7 '1 ►'I\ n'w 6 lc 70 w D. '7 w • VIO KI-�a v• to oln volt' A z <IK • i • �•+! t r » Dr •Ir w +r 7 r• y O 1 r 7111 o 7 rl►+7 » r 7 N ►� • C Pr I V O M M 7 •I iz + • + N D + I Y -1 Y 314 r a• + 7 n N n •K o n I iN I c I- IY I' 17 • n N • a I� O 7 n a n 0 C 7 A Y C w 7 O 7 r N r O aim �In C�y 7» al r�•r IK Ala Vow 610 9iw •:Dr 71• w w'n 71 n I y •Y O,n A K I0 y Iw + O • e Y !7 lCL w Ia I' • IY IM I" i r I I C) NI c> « z >A -Im m> z> z o z 0 TI a ! I m • n r + T 0 1 r 30 I w > ., l orl = I I w a -N1 & T .V 7; 2 >ol > I NO AW *'-% Z M' D v -4 -4 -41 a 01 0-' UI 111 .661 W •• �• -..... _. O .1 10 in Z! Z 0,o o oic of y m►+ -I 00 1 °wN wN- I,0w0t0n:0 - �:Do m000 I c -•- a r D N 2 ro 110 m 2 a +Iw N « > m IW O 1 -C W O7 O!mm;acrmACT'ns =!TVnI > >N'fD + 1 CiXXmO►.O'O >>,D <o;MxO!NN -4m • O - •1:V'9i'zDCr -1 n.11T200 =!NN >:Z ! 017 N'MMm!r.W"I•nm••'►•mmITTS , mo-1'm «.I z z m rn " -a m r-, -a y9 !-4 0 MI M n 30 a TA m,D>oN.- .m,oc- +:roo :n3I M >nIr N Ww 'tow - 4 zic -1w. ZC- ■ ■<IO -1 >: OD 7 I C N: r r M. n K -4. X" M, + z -1 m' 33 M co, r1r MIMM2:o torN'22o•ixir.TO Ic 7' ►' A' TI 2 ►+ >D rn " ' V .. DD > • I m -1. Z nl <1 -4-1• vzm - 42z1«• >zm••M3b!0 Ole ►+!�z�*• N•9T- c >O«,ZZNr1 -1mXi n'.Ccz'Tcrc im<ANNTOiCn I r!V fRNNNImz >ZTZIm >CTOn1a>DTi I+ 1 N -4- ICINDCfIOc- +.z- 4rioMxIMMcI O 7 MIMZm Z. M".34W -1 1 >ZI wJa i T'n Mn2' a z0 i1 >AIT -1 t7 .1' «• =CC Z1 < m ml I -t z ••I> -� :o: c .. ; ;a » l C Z Z nl m zl o, -1 - >I Z o A1c aDlOOmI\ -� ITTZI;oZiaz •I1 ►. CC 102-1; + 11 . z Z Z T 2 j > O 0 N OCC CI ' y' o' C Z. -1 -1 m a ; o .. - wl M 2 < D T MITI! z I ►<, +I• 5D r o -1 nl l o m ., �I M� M• M I N w... K T I �0 ow I T c 211-4 N O A r O ►17 I 2T + I o� 31,4 rn QI z N • i IM Ni�NM!~~ IM NMIMnI. N N M N )tOP- 1Ntom tntoN�U ntl A O• ►1P NiUI01.Oo1Oo W kntoAinwo -4 r Ic r O r O 0�00�.1oofUlOD�oW --ryW ODNjv WO�II N w 00 �1►Nd•OO�Cio oVll- �00{♦ N m (o `v� i l ambio�oluom°i.at,xO� >aww.�tn Ln 1 ! co to W N •° co t� e9 to Owl .o Go M + y to 1 ' I I r I i N � I Go I i Do 00 p� A IL i I i I I • ; ! I I I i i I 1 ITT j -rr� -C o •< O T C Z l7 I I �O > i � I m � o n v 'D A 0 I �+ r -211 In M ` I N �d \a m° ►015 I O i i0 O O O O Im IA . .N • •'D r . .-.v » • •V y M M o n I Ir i- Ir i o 3 I I 7 7 3- 's 0 I 1 I± di -5 c'7 c »Im VIA w OIr 10 IK • • O .1 rn y -I lv o;o w:III o c • IK • 7 7 0 7 nA �•• ✓••K 7 '1 ►'I\ n'w 6 lc 70 w D. '7 w • VIO KI-�a v• to oln volt' A z <IK • i • �•+! t r » Dr •Ir w +r 7 r• y O 1 r 7111 o 7 rl►+7 » r 7 N ►� • C Pr I V O M M 7 •I iz + • + N D + I Y -1 Y 314 r a• + 7 n N n •K o n I iN I c I- IY I' 17 • n N • a I� O 7 n a n 0 C 7 A Y C w 7 O 7 r N r O aim �In C�y 7» al r�•r IK Ala Vow 610 9iw •:Dr 71• w w'n 71 n I y •Y O,n A K I0 y Iw + O • e Y !7 lCL w Ia I' • IY IM I" i r I I C) NI c> « z >A -Im m> z> z o z 0 TI a ! I m • n r + T 0 1 r 30 I w > ., l orl = I I w a -N1 & T .V 7; 2 >ol > I NO AW *'-% Z M' D v -4 -4 -41 a 01 0-' UI 111 .661 W •• �• -..... _. O .1 10 in Z! Z 0,o o oic of y m►+ -I 00 1 °wN wN- I,0w0t0n:0 - �:Do m000 I c -•- a r D N 2 ro 110 m 2 a +Iw N « > m IW O 1 -C W O7 O!mm;acrmACT'ns =!TVnI > >N'fD + 1 CiXXmO►.O'O >>,D <o;MxO!NN -4m • O - •1:V'9i'zDCr -1 n.11T200 =!NN >:Z ! 017 N'MMm!r.W"I•nm••'►•mmITTS , mo-1'm «.I z z m rn " -a m r-, -a y9 !-4 0 MI M n 30 a TA m,D>oN.- .m,oc- +:roo :n3I M >nIr N Ww 'tow - 4 zic -1w. ZC- ■ ■<IO -1 >: OD 7 I C N: r r M. n K -4. X" M, + z -1 m' 33 M co, r1r MIMM2:o torN'22o•ixir.TO Ic 7' ►' A' TI 2 ►+ >D rn " ' V .. DD > • I m -1. Z nl <1 -4-1• vzm - 42z1«• >zm••M3b!0 Ole ►+!�z�*• N•9T- c >O«,ZZNr1 -1mXi n'.Ccz'Tcrc im<ANNTOiCn I r!V fRNNNImz >ZTZIm >CTOn1a>DTi I+ 1 N -4- ICINDCfIOc- +.z- 4rioMxIMMcI O 7 MIMZm Z. M".34W -1 1 >ZI wJa i T'n Mn2' a z0 i1 >AIT -1 t7 .1' «• =CC Z1 < m ml I -t z ••I> -� :o: c .. ; ;a » l C Z Z nl m zl o, -1 - >I Z o A1c aDlOOmI\ -� ITTZI;oZiaz •I1 ►. CC 102-1; + 11 . z Z Z T 2 j > O 0 N OCC CI ' y' o' C Z. -1 -1 m a ; o .. - wl M 2 < D T MITI! z I ►<, +I• 5D r o -1 nl l o m ., �I M� M• M I N w... K T I �0 ow I T c 211-4 N O A r O ►17 I 2T + I o� 31,4 rn QI z N • i IM Ni�NM!~~ IM NMIMnI. N N M N )tOP- 1Ntom tntoN�U ntl A O• ►1P NiUI01.Oo1Oo W kntoAinwo -4 r Ic r O r O 0�00�.1oofUlOD�oW --ryW ODNjv WO�II N w 00 �1►Nd•OO�Cio oVll- �00{♦ N m (o `v� i l ambio�oluom°i.at,xO� >aww.�tn Ln 1 ! co to W N •° co t� e9 to Owl .o Go M + y to 1 ' I I r I i N � I Go I i Do 00 p� A IL i I i I I • ; ! I I I i i I 1 ITT j -rr� -C o •< O T C Z l7 I I �O > i � I m � o n v 'D A 0 I �+ r -211 In M ` I N �d \a m° ►015 co to W N •° co t� e9 to Owl .o Go M + y to 1 ' I I r I i N � I Go I i Do 00 p� A IL i I i I I • ; ! I I I i i I 1 ITT j -rr� -C o •< O T C Z l7 I I �O > i � I m � o n v 'D A 0 I �+ r -211 In M ` I N �d \a m° ►015 ITT j -rr� -C o •< O T C Z l7 I I �O > i � I m � o n v 'D A 0 I �+ r -211 In M ` I N �d \a m° ►015 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER 06/10/98 THROUGH 06/30/98 Date Payee Amount Description 06/10 Healthcomp 1,586.27 Weekly eligible claims week ending 06/09/98 06/10 W.B.M.W.D. 720,246.80 Water Payment April 1998 06/12 IRS 144,386.92 Federal Payroll Taxes P/R # 25 06/12 Emp. Dev. Dept. 27,744.44 State Payroll Taxes P/R #25 06/17 Healthcomp 1,661.24 Weekly eligible claims week ending 06/16/98 06/24 Federal Reserve 300.00 Employee Bond Purchase P/R #25 06/24 Healthcomp 170.00 Weekly eligible claims week ending 06/23/98 06/26 IRS 137,837.30 Federal Payroll Taxes P/R #26 06/26 Emp. Dev. Dept. 26,971.28 State Payroll Taxes P/R #26 DATE OF RATIFICATION: 07/07/98 TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE: Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by : City Treasurer Jag,& Finai City Date 6 I err► -+� Date Date 1,060,904.25 Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo. 6 s 0160