The URL can be used to link to this page

1998 AUG 18 CC PACKETAGENDA EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items. The Public can participate in the discussion of any item listed on the Agenda. To facilitate your presentation, please place a check mark beside each item you would like to address on the Agenda provided by the City Clerk, preferably PRIOR to the start of the meeting. Any other item not listed on the Agenda that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council may be directly addressed during Public Communications. Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and give: Your name and address and the organization you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits. Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2:00 p.m. the prior Tuesday). The request must include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 607 -2208. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, August 18,1998 - 5:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember John Gaines ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to Ciiy Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on beha f of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. CLOSED SESSION: The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, (Lt sue.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as follows: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a)) - 1. In the Matter of the Application of City of Los Angeles, OAH No. L- 9604014 2. Hill v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 030986 0818985p Utl��t 3. Hughes v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. BC 185210 4. Mosleh & Greffon v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 025903 5. Fenwick v. Civil Service Commission and City of El Segundo, 2 Civil B121282 and Los Angeles No. BSO44667. 6. El Segundo v. Kilroy, LASC Case No. YC 031166 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(b): -0- potential case (no further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c): -2- matters. DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) - City Manager recruitment; and CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957.6) - Meet with negotiator, City Attorney Mark Hensley, with respect to City Manager position. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) - None. REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required) ADJOURNMENT POSTED: DATE g TIME 3a NAM 0818985p G AGENDA EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items. The Public can participate in the discussion of any item listed on the Agenda. To facilitate your presentation, please place a check mark beside each item you would like to address on the Agenda provided by the City Clerk, preferably PRIO R to the start of the meeting. Any other item not listed on the Agenda that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council may be directly addressed during Public Communications. Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and give: Your name and address and the organization you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits. Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2:00 p.m. the prior Tuesday). The request must include a brief general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 607 -2208. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, AUGUST 18,1998 - 7:00 P.M. Next Resolution #-4-M Next Ordinance # 1288 CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION - Rev. John Svendsen, First Baptist Church of El Segundo PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember John Gaines PRESENTATIONS ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. llU�:)�fi�j A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS 1. Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only. Recommendation - Approval. B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS - 2. Proposed (Third Quarter) amendments (unfinished items) to the General Plan and Zoning Code: 1) Signs; and 6) Amplified Sound Permits; and, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Environmental Assessment EA -419A, General Plan Amendment 97 -3A, and Zone Text Amendment ZTA 97-3A. Third quarter Amendments Applicant: City of El Segundo. Recommendation - 1) Open Continued Public Hearing; 2) Continue public hearing until September 15, 1998; and /or, 3) Other possible action /direction. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - Report on the potential for deployment of Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Odor Detection (i.e., "Odor Sniffer ") devices Recommendation - Receive and file report. D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 4. CHMS Park Vista Management Operating Agreement Extension. Recommendation - The El Segundo Senior Housing Board unanimously recommends extending the Park Vista Management Agreement with Community Housing Management Services for the next two years. Extension beginning January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2000. 5. Schedule interviews of candidates for Community Cable Advisory Committee and Recreation & Parks Commission( "GCBs ")with filing deadline set for 48 hours prior to interviews. Recommendation - Set date of interviews for approximately 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, September 1, 1998. 6. Appropriate $350,000 and approve the LAX Intervention Project for $1,225,000 as discussed by City Council Jul 21 1998 Recommendation - Appropriate the transfer of funds to the LAX Intervention budget. E. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business. 7. Warrant Numbers 249426 - 249745 on Demand Register Summary Number 03 in total amount of $713,321.00, Warrant Numbers 249749 - 249783 on Demand Register Summary Number 31 in total amount of $137,814.97, and Wire Transfers in the amount of 51 066 723 15 Recommendation - Approve Warrant Demand Register and Authorize staff to release. Ratify: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or agreements; emergency disbursements and /or adjustments; and wire transfers from 07/28/98 to 08/11/98. 8. City Council meeting minutes of August 4, 1998 Recommendation - Approval. 9. Adoption of plans and specifications for construction of a storm drain in the 500 block of Washington Street -Project No PW 98 -4 (estimated cost= $150.000.00). Recommendation - Adopt plans and specifications and authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids. 10. Acceptance of the Roller Hockey Rink (Phase 1) construction in Recreation Park (final contract amount =S55.999.00. Recommendation - 1) Approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $1,000. 2) Accept the work as complete. 3) Authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's Office. 11. Authorize stop signs for eastbound and westbound Pine Avenue at Kansas Street Recommendation - Adopt resolution. 12. Request for approval of two approximately 827.25 square foot wall signs and two temporary banners for Hughes Electronics to be located on the top of the northeast and southeast facing walls of 200 North Sepulveda Boulevard (Sign Plan 98 -21) Applicant: Hughes Electronics. Recommendation - 1) Approve proposed wall signs; and /or, 2) Other possible action /direction. 13. Request for proposals (RFP) and statements of qualifications from qualified consultants to prepare a requisite update of the General Plan Housing Element.Fiscal Impact: Not to exceed $30,000-00. Recommendation - Authorize staff to solicit proposals from qualified consultants. 14. Establishment of a professional services contract with MRH Structural Engineers for professional plan checking services of stracturai and special high -rise construction projects on an "as- needed" basis. The amount to be paid the Contractor under this agreement is estimated to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000); and, therefore requires City Council review and approval Recommendation - Approval of the contract for MRH Structural Engineers. 0 0`.9 15. Revised class specification and resolution establishing a new monthly salary range for the job classification of Community Cable Program Supervisor. Fiscal impact: Funding for the adjusted salary ranee . included in the Fiscal Year 1998 -99 Operating Budget Recommendation - 1) Approve Class Specification. 2) Adopt Resolution. 16. Proposed class specification for the new Mid - Management job classification of Business Services Manager and a Resolution increasing the basic monthly salary range by 5 %. Fiscal Impact: Funding for the one - position job classification is contained in the Fiscal Year 1998/99 Operating Budget Recommendation - 1) Approve Class Specification. 2) Adopt Resolution. 17. Proposed Resolution of the City Council of the City of El Segundo, California, providing a 2% salary increase for the City's part-time temporary employees. Fiscal Impact: $12,630 annualized cost. Funding for the increase is contained in the City's 1998 -99 Fiscal Year Operating Budget Recommendation - Adopt Resolution. 18. Request for Proposal (.RFP) to 11pdate City Circulation Element. Recommendation - Approve the RFP and authorize staff to solicit proposals. 19. Approve retaining Lawrence R. Moss & Associates to design and prepare plans for the El Segundo Skateboard Park Fiscal Impact• $19.500. Recommendation - 1) Approve an agreement with Lawrence R. Moss & Associates to design and prepare plans for El Segundo Skateboard Park at a cost of $19,500. 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. 20. Resolution approving the application for funds in the amount of $33,535 from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District per Parcel Discretionary Grant Program for El Segundo Skateboard Park Recommendation - Approve Resolution. 21. Resolution approving the application for funds in the amount of $41,000 from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District per Parcel Discretionary Grant Program for El Segundo Roller Hockey Rink. Recommendation - Approve Resolution. 22. Extension of City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Contracts. Recommendation - Approve no -cost extension of City's RSI Contracts through end of calendar year 1998. 23. Authorization to solicit bids for an annual contract for sidewalk, curb and other minor repairs - Project No PW 98 -3 (budgeted amount $50.000.00). Recommendation - Authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of bids. ADJOURNMENT POSTED: DATE: TIME: NAME: S- 081898ag.doc } 0 i; �, CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INTER - DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE August 10, 1998 TO Tim Grimmond Acting City Manager FROM Bellur Devaraj City Engineer *)&eVA^V' SUBJECT Potential Conflict of Interest Items - City Council Meeting of August 18, 1998 Is the project within 300 feet of a business or property owned by a City Council member? BKD:dr cc: Ed Schroder, Director of Public Works NAMEMOMONFLICT.AG2 Mayor Mayor Council Council Council Consent Agenda Item Mike Pro Tern Member Member Member Gordon Sandra Nancy John Kelly Jacobs Wernick Gaines McDowell Adoption of plans and specifications for the sidewalk replacement, handicapped access ramps and new sidewalks on Grand Avenue: 1. Sidewalk replacement (City -wide) at various locations. Yes Yes Yes No Yes 2. Handicapped access ramps at various locations. No No No No No 3. Grand Avenue sidewalk northside between Illinois No No No No No Street and Sepulveda Boulevard. Adoption of plans and specifications for the construction of No No No Yes Yes a storm drain in the 500 block of Washington Street. Authorization to solicit bids for annual sidewalk repair contract. Note: Specific work locations have not yet been identified. BKD:dr cc: Ed Schroder, Director of Public Works NAMEMOMONFLICT.AG2 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Special Orders of Business - Public Hearing AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Proposed (Third quarter) amendments (unfinished items) to the General Plan and Zoning Code: 1) Signs; and 6) Amplified Sound Permits; and, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts in accordance with the California Environmental Duality Act (CEQA). Environmental Assessment EA -419A, General Plan Amendment 97 -3A, and Zone Text Amendment ZTA 97 -3A, Third quarter Amendments. Applicant: City of El Segundo. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1) Open Continued Public Hearing; 2) Continue public hearing until September 15, 1998; and /or, 3) Other possible action /direction. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: On November 18, December 2, January 3, 6, 20, February 3, 17, March 3, and 17, 1998, the City Council held a continued public hearing on the above referenced project. On March 17, 1998, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1286 to amend the following sections of the City's General Plan, Zoning Code, and Local Coastal Program: A) Mini - Variances, B -I) Detached Accessory Buildings and B -II) Accessory Buildings, C) Residential Wall Heights, D) School Parking, E) Coastal Development Permits, and F) TDR's - Transfer of Development Rights, in the Third Ouarter Amendments packet. At its March 3, 1998 meeting, the Council directed staff to continue the discussions on Signs and Amplified Sound Permits, which were also a part of the Third quarter amendments. These two items were then continued to April 21, June 16, 1998, and then to tonight. DISCUSSION: On June 16, 1998 (Continued from March 3 and 17, and April 21, 1998), the Council directed staff to continue the public hearing on Signs and Amplified Sound Permits in order for the City Attorney to review several issues related to the proposed revisions to the Sign Code, and to provide staff the opportunity to meet with residents and business owners regarding the development of the revised Amplified Sound Permit regulations. Staff has met with business owners twice, and residents, but still has not been able to bring closure (i.e., reach consensus) in the discussions, and the Planning Commission has not yet reviewed any revisions. Therefore, staff requests that the deliberations on Amplified Sound Permits be continued until September 15, 1998. (Continued on Next Page ) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. None FISCAL IMPACT: None. ORIGINATED: Date: 10 August 1998 Bret B Bernard, AICP, Direct r of Planning and Building Safety REVIEWED BY: Date: ACTIONFTAKEN: O 0 10 1 P iz /cif p:\zoning \ea419a \ea419a -3. doc B -2 EA -419A, GPA 97- 3A/ZTA 97 -3A City Council Staff Report August 18, 1998 DISCUSSION (Continued): Page 2 On January 6, 1998, the City Council and Planning Commission held a joint public workshop on the Third quarter amendments, which included a discussion of proposed modification to the Sign Code. The Council reached a consensus on all but two sign issues (the size of announcement signs and abatement of abandoned signs). Staff and the City Attorney requested previous continuances of the discussions on the Sign Code to review abandoned signs. Staff and the City Attorney have now completed their review of abandoned signs However, staff recommends that the Council take up the continued deliberations of this topic when the discussion of Amplified Sound Permits are discussed on September 15, 1998. The following is a summary of the discussions and actions that have already taken place for the proposed amendments to signs and amplified sound permits. 1. Signs - Revise Sign requirements, including political signs (GPA & ZTA). After receiving input from members of the community, the City Council, on January 6, 1998, reviewed the proposed revisions to the Sign Code (Chapter 20.60 of the El Segundo Municipal Code) and took the following actions on specific proposed revisions: Off -Site Signage - The consensus of the Council was to maintain the City's ban on Billboards (off -site signage in excess of 500 square feet) and the current prohibition on off -site signs within 500 feet of a State or County Highway. The Council also expressed an interest in possibly permitting certain off -site directional signs to help businesses which may not be visible from the main thoroughfares in the City and staff has added language to address this (Section 20.60.080 G). The Council also discussed provisions in the Sign Code to permit "gateway" and other promotional signs for the City. Staff believes proposed language in the exemption and public right -of -way sections (Sections 29.60.100 and 20.60.120) in the Sign Code would enable the City to establish such signage. 2. Pole Signs - The Council majority agreed that it was not appropriate to adopt a General Plan Amendment which would discourage pole signs in the City until further study is conducted by staff and the Planning Commission on the appropriate use of pole signs in different parts of the City. The Council accepted the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff to bring this item back at a future date with additional analysis, including a survey of pole sign requirements in other cities, separate from the third quarter amendments, in order to avoid delaying the rest of the sign amendments and the overall third quarter review. 3. Announcement Signs - The consensus of the Council was to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission to add a one year maximum duration for which Announcement Signs (Section 20.60.080 H4.) could be used for a new development or business. However, no apparent consensus was reached regarding staff's recommendation to permit announcement signs greater than 100 square feet east of Sepulveda Boulevard. Therefore, staff would suggest that the City Council consider allowing 150 square feet of signage east of Sepulveda at it meeting on September 15, 1998, and provide further direction on this issue at that time. 4. Political Signs - The consensus of the Council was to retain the existing regulations for political signs which permit signs to be a maximum of four (4) square feet, instead of allowing the larger signs as recommended by the Planning Commission and City Attorney. 5. Flashing and Moving Signs - The Council directed staff to revise the sign requirements for flashing and moving signs to clarify that flashing and moving signs would only be prohibited if the colors in the sign or their location would interfere with vehicular safety (Section 20.60.110 I.). Council consensus was to not accept the Planning Commissions recommendation to prohibit all flashing and moving signs, with specific exemptions. 6. Temporary Signs - The City Council accepted the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff to list animals or human beings used as temporary signage in subsection of Section (20.60.080 H.), provided they would not be located on public property or in the public right -of -way. 7. Public Right -of -Way Signs - Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission, staff, and the City Attorney, the consensus of the City Council was to ensure that no new right was being granted for signs 1-1 0�I t EA -419A, GPA 97- 3A/ZTA 97 -3A Page 3 City Council Staff Report August 18, 1998 in the public right -of -way, by deleting Section 20.60.120 B., which allows temporary signs in the public right -of- way. Since all public signs, emergency, and construction signs are covered in other subsections of this section, the Council felt it appropriate to eliminate this subsection to prevent signs such as political, real estate, open house or garage sale signs from being placed in the public right -of -way. 8. Murals and Works of Art - The consensus of the City Council was to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission to include regulations for murals in the Sign Code in order to avoid confusion as to what type of message might be considered a commercial message on a mural versus simply "artwork ". The proposed revision adds non - commercial Works of Art, such as historical and community murals, as a permitted use (Section 20.60. 080 M.), and allowing works of art to exceed the 500 square foot sign limit, without City Council approval. Works of Art intended for commercial purposes would be considered as signage and regulated the same as other signs in the Zoning Code. Based on the discussion of the Council and Commission on January 6, 1998, staff reviewed the provisions for murals in residential zones. Staff found that the proposed sign code did not address murals in residential zones, so staff has added language to Section 20.60.080 to permit Works of Art in residential zones which are not used for commercial purposes. 9. Abandoned Signs - On January 6, 1998, the Council did not accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission to permit abandoned signs to continue beyond the 45 day limit listed in Section 9.54.020(m) of the Municipal Code or the 90 day limit proposed as part of Section 20.60.150 when the building or property on which the sign is actively available for lease. State law requires that when the Sign Code of a City is amended, an inventory of illegal and abandoned signs must commence within 120 days of adoption of the sign code revisions. Within 60 days after the 120 day period, State law requires the City to commence abatement proceedings against illegal and abandoned signs. Therefore, the existing Municipal Code time frame of 45 days for a abandoned sign to become a public nuisance does not appear to be consistent with State law. As a result, on February 3, 1998, staff requested additional clarification from the Council to determine if a sign should be considered abandoned after 45 days or 90 days and to clarify if there would be any circumstances in which a sign could continue to be used 45 or 90 days after a business has discontinued operation. The City Attorney had requested that the Council delay its discussion and decisions on abandoned signs so that he would have time to review these issues with staff. The Sign Code cannot be adopted without provisions for abandoned signs, as State law requires an inventory and abatement of illegal and abandoned signs within a certain time frame after the adoption of new sign provisions. The revised Sign Code contains language for abatement of abandoned signs acceptable to the City Attorney. Staff and the City Attorney recommend that these revisions be discussed at the September 15, 1998 Council meeting. 2. Amplified Sound Permits - Limit number of Amplified Sound Permits per address to four (4) in any one calendar year (Chapter 9.06). Applicants may apply for an Entertainment Permit (Chapter 5.36) or an Adjustment (Chapter 20.78), for construction noise permits, for more than four (4) permits per year (ZTA). This item is also a continuation of an item which remained unfinished as part of the Second quarter amendments due to the City Attorneys request to review the legal issues involved with the possible limitation of the number of Amplified Sound Permits which may be issued per year. On March 3, 1998, the Council requested that Planning staff work with the business community and residents impacted by the Amplified Sound Permit regulations and develop consensus on a proposal to revise the regulations. On March 20 and June 2, 1998, staff met with the operators of several downtown restaurants and one local resident to discussed the proposed revisions to the Amplified Sound Permit regulations and to receive input on the amplified sound /entertainment needs of the businesses. Staff requested that the businesses try to develop an "average" operational plan of amplified entertainment needs of the restaurants which could become the basis for a baseline number of amplified sound permits that might per permitted. The business operators have submitted a draft of an "average" operational plan on June 13, 1998, which addresses indoor and outdoor sound amplification. Staff is requesting that the Council continue the discussion of Amplified Sound Permits until September 15, 1998 in order to give staff, the business community, and residents additional time to meet and reach a consensus on revisions to the Amplified Sound Permit regulations and possibly the Entertainment Permit regulations in the El Segundo Municipal Code (Chapter 5.36). EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 18 August 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Report on the potential for deployment of Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Odor Detection (i.e., 'Odor Sniffer') devices. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Receive and File the Report. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting of 07 July 1998, staff was asked by Council member John Gaines to research the opportunity for placement of 'Odor Sniffer' devices on private properties adjacent to the city of Los Angeles' Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant ( "Hyperion "). El Segundo's contract Mitigation Monitor and consultant for Hyperion issues — Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates ( "RBF ") — was directed by staff to investigate if such devices are available, determine their effectiveness, and estimate their cost(s). The Report from RBF is attached for your review. DISCUSSION: With the assistance of the City's Hyperion Mitigation Monitor — RBF, staff has reviewed the possibility for and advisability of placing "Odor Sniffer" devices on residential properties located next to and /or near the city of Los Angeles Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant. The full findings of this review are contained in the attached "ESSM — Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Odor Detection" memorandum from John Nagle and Scott Tatalovich of RBF. However, the primary conclusions drawn from the Report and subsequent discussions with its authors are that: (Continued on next page) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENT: ESMM — Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Odor Detection memorandum; John Nagle and Scott Tatalovich, RBF; 27 July 1998. FISCAL IMPACT: Potentially significant. (Check one) Operating Budget — Capital Improvement Budget: Amount Requested: -0- Project Account Budget: -0- Project/Account Balance: -0- Account Number: None Project Phase: N/A Appropriation Required - Yes X No No monies have been budgeted, to date, for the purchase of any 'Odor Sniffer' devices or associated equipment. At a cost of $2,000 per unit, together with $27,000 to $38,000 in additional costs for the computer connectivity of each "Odor Sniffer', the overall Fiscal Impacts could be quite significant. If the initial deployment were to include four homes, for example, the cost could run from $116,400 to $160,400. No City monies have been budgeted for this project, nor are there (at this time) any other known monetary sources available, such as Mitigation Impact funds from the City of Los Angeles (Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant). Therefore, any Fiscal Impacts would need to be handled by the City's General Fund surplus. ORIGINATED: Date: 12 August 19uts Bret B Bernar , AICP, ;rector of Planning and Building Safety REVIEWED BY: Date: mond, Interim TAKEN: er � 1 -xlre Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Odor Detection Devices page #2 — Citv Council Meeting of 18 August 1998 DISCUSSION: (... continued) • The mechanical measurement is less effective than the power of the human nose. • The devices will not necessarily be able to measure all the odors that emanate from the Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant, particularly those most malodorous and offensive. The cost of the system, when it includes the requisite reporting equipment — networked or not — is prohibitive. It is difficult to determine where these devices should be located. While it would be obvious to locate some number on the properties most proximate to the Plant (i.e., along Dune Street), odors are regularly reported from throughout the western residential section of the City. Changing micro - environmental conditions make it impossible to predict the best location(s) for odor readings. The information would be inconclusive at best; and, might be used contrary to the best interests of those most affected by the bi- products of the Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant. The measurements might well include reading from other sources, most especially bi- products from jet airplanes arriving and departing from LAX. It has yet to be demonstrated that these devices are fully effective, let alone for an extended period of time, outside a controlled and closed environment. Based upon these findings, it was the opinion of our contract Mitigation Monitors, that it would not serve the best overall interests of El Segundo to purchase and locate "Odor Sniffers" at this time. Staff concurs with this analysis, and recommends that such devices not be deployed at the current time. Hyperion Citizens Forum The bi- monthly, regularly scheduled "informal" meeting of the EL Segundo representatives to the Hyperion Citizens Forum ( "HCF ") took place on Wednesday, 12 August 1998. Having received the RBF Report just prior to the HCF meeting, the members attending were asked for their review and input. It was the consensus of the group, including City Council member Nancy Wernick, that it would not be advisable to place "Odor Sniffer' devices on the properties adjacent to and surrounding the Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant at this time. They indicated that a very similar proposal had been brought before them a number of years ago, and that after careful review, they had thought the idea not in the best interests of the City or of those impacted by the Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant. They questioned the relative effectiveness of the devices compared to the olfactory powers of the human nose and the overall cost of the endeavor. The group also feared that emissions from moving sources, most particularly from Los Angeles International Airport ( "LAX "), might also be 'read' and recorded by the devices, thereby confusing the matter of odor identification. In addition, consistent with the RBF analysis, the representatives indicated they felt the devices could not detect, and therefore measure, all of the odors that emanate from the Plant. They expressed fears that, if relied upon as a "scientific measure ", their human sensory detection might no longer be considered valid by the city of Los Angeles and other responsible /monitoring parties, such as the South Coast Air Quality District. The unanimous recommendation of the HCF representatives was not to purchase "Odor Sniffers" and the accompanying equipment. P1BLDGWYPERION /bbb (WP Word) ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS MEMORANDUM To: Bret Bernard JN 28537MM From: John Nagle /Scott Tatalovich Date: July 27, 1998 Subject: ESMM — Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Odor Detection Per your request, we have summarized the following information regarding hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas odor monitoring. During this recent investigation into the subject topic, we spoke to several suppliers and other related odor detection professionals and researched wastewater treatment manuals on odor detection when compiling this memorandum. RBF has concluded the following items during this investigation: 1. Hydrogen sulfide gas is the primary source of odor which emanates from the Hyperion Wastewater Treatment Plant. Other gasses such as methane, also emanate from the Hyperion WTP, but do not possess the "raw sewage" odor. Some of the typical hazardous gasses that are present in Wastewater Treatment Plants are shown in Table 1, "Common Dangerous Gases Encountered in Wastewater Collection Systems and at Wastewater Treatment Plants," adapted from Operation of Wastewater Treatment Plants, Fourth Edition, Volume II, 1996, prepared by the California State University, Sacramento Department of Civil Engineering for the Environmental Protection Agency. 2. The present hydrogen gas detection technology is not capable of providing an economically effective odor monitoring program for the City of El Segundo at the perimeter of the Hyperion WTP that would record concentrations in the range of human odor detection. 3. Most hydrogen sulfide gas detection devices employed at wastewater treatment plants have been used for regulatory purposes in enclosed or confined spaces. Professional Service Since 1944 A4fALTON PARKWAY, IRVINE, CA 92618 -2069 • P.O. BOX 57057, IRVINE, CA 92619 -7057 • 949.472.3505 • FAX 949.472.8373 . OFFICES LOCATED THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA AND NEVADA • WEB SITE: www.rbf.com P,— W —yc� Paw The following information provides the details of this investigation: Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) gas has a rotten egg odor in small concentrations (less than 10 ppm), but the human sense of smell is rapidly impaired under higher concentrations. Essentially the gas is odorless at high concentrations. The gas is colorless, as well. The human nose capable of detecting H2S gas at a concentration in the range of parts per billion (ppb). The following limits with respect to the presently available odor detection devices were noted during our investigation: • Equipment capable of continuous H2S gas detection, such as the equipment described in detail below, can detect H2S gas in the parts per million (ppm) range. • Equipment capable of detecting H2S gas in the range of the parts per billion (ppb) and lower exists. These devices are, in industry, referred to as odor analyzers, and they utilize a discrete odor sampling method (they do not sample continuously). This equipment is meant for laboratory testing and the equipment is very expensive by comparison to the odor detection devices mentioned above and listed below. Such equipment is not expected to be effective in the application of odor detection at the perimeter of the Hyperion Wastewater Treatment Plant (WTP). The analysis procedure of the equipment is more manual than automatic. • Additionally, an H2S gas sensitive film placed on a strip of paper does exist and could detect H2S gas in the ppb concentration range, however, this process is, again, more manual than automatic, and the concentration, source, and time of detection could not be objectively identified. • Most of the noted applications of odor detection devices have been for regulatory purposes. Wastewater treatment plants (including Hyperion) use these devices to detect high concentrations of H2S gas in confined spaces for the safety of operations personnel; it is required equipment. One special open air application of an H2S gas detection device was identified by a supplier at the Cranberry Township WTP in Pennsylvania. The device was situated approximately 50 feet back at the four corners of an open air secondary treatment process, for the purpose of odor detection. As it was explained to RBF, the WTP wanted to log the number of odor occurrences and the time of such an occurrence in relation to plant operations at the time of such an occurrence. H: \GRP13\PDATA \28537 \WPWIN \MEMO\H2S_ODR3.WPD 2 HYDROGENSULF /DE ODOR DETECTION MEMORANDUM The following types of devices are available that have continuous H2S gas sampling: IV. PERSONAL These devices attach to a belt or shoulder strap and have an alarm signal and may have a readout for the level of H2S gas. V. PORTABLE These devices may be carried by hand and placed near a work site. They have an alarm signal and may have a meter to indicate level of H2S gas. VI. STATIONARY These devices are installed permanently and have an alarm signal and a meter to indicate level of H2S gas. This type of device is probably the most useful for the consultants understanding of the purpose of the City of El Segundo's interest. The following applications have been identified this type of H2S gas analyzer. A. Direct Meter Readout 1. Single Stand Alone Unit 2. Multiple Stand Alone Units B. Networked Meter Readout 1. Units Hardwired to a Computer 2. Units Telemetered to a Computer A. Direct Meter Readout This type of sampling device refers to the stand alone units which can detect H2S gas. These devices have the following capabilities: • Alarm; 70, 93, or 95 db • Event recording capable of storing the minimum, maximum, and average of the events which have occurred over one of the following pre -set automatically zeroing cycle times: 1 hour, 8 hours, or 24 hours. • Stored data is time and date stamped. These devices could be used in the following ways: 1. Single Stand Alone Unit Total Equipment Cost $ 2,000 2. Multiple Stand Alone Units Total Equipment Cost $ 2,000 /Unit H: \GRP13\PDATA \28537 \WPWIN\MEMO\H2S_ODR3.WPD 3 HYDROGEN SULFIDE ODOR DETECTION MEMORANDUM The direct meter readout units would require operation and maintenance staff to physically go to each meter to retrieve the logged data. B. Networked Meter Readout These sampling devices are the same device as the direct meter readout units, but contain a Motorola electronic computer chip that allows several units to be linked together and transfer recorded data to one central remote control unit. There are compatibility issues with software and hardware. One method of detection identified by the distributer of the Ultima Gas Monitor (see attached manufactures brochure) for detecting odors from Hyperion Plant is by individual sampling units ( Ultima Gas Monitors) linked together with a wire and power source with an IBM based personal computer that is running under windows NT; Windows 95 or other is not compatible with the available Lawnworks operational software. The personal computer would be installed with a Lawnworks software that is capable of receiving signals from the individual samplers and storing the data on the hard disk. The data could then be handled in a number of ways including spreadsheets like Microsoft Excel. The following applications are available to these networked samplers: 1. Units Hardwired to a Computer If the gas samplers (units) are hardwired to the personal computer (maximum distance approximately 6,000 feet), then the following costs are estimated: Gas Sampler (5@ $1,100 /each) $ 5,500 Personal Computer $ 4,000 Software $ 8,100 Power Source $ 500 Conduit, wire, and other required for installation, and installation $ 1,000 Installation, Labor and Training $10,000 Total $ 29,100 2. Units Telemetered to a Computer If the gas samplers (units) are radio telemetered to the receiving personal computer, then the following costs are estimated: Gas Sampler (5 @ 1,100 /each) $ 5,500 Personal Computer $ 4,000 Software $ 8,100 Power Source $ 500 Radio Telemetry Equipment $7,500 Conduit, wire, and other required for installation, and installation $ 1,000 Installation, Labor and Training 13,500 OV] F5 Total $ 40,100 H: \GRP13\PDATA \28537 \WPWIN \MEMO\H2S_ODR3.WPD 4 HYDROGEN SULFIDE ODOR DETECTION MEMORANDUM [1] Includes a remote terminal unit. Does not include additional equipment, which may be required at City Operations Center. No limit to the number of gas samplers that could be strung together was identified. The local representative that was contacted regarding the Ultima product provided RBF with the above estimated costs on a budgeting basis. All costs are subject to change upon further discussion and detailing of the products that would be required to perform the odor detection that is desired by the City of El Segundo. Additionally, the following operational issues were identified during conversations with the odor detection equipment suppliers: 1. What distance can the sensor and transmitter be separated? Approximately 6,000 feet by hard wire connection. 2. Where have sensors been installed (On the ground, off the ground at what elevation)? The units could be installed on the ground or elevated on a post. The units are weather proof. Hydrogen sulfide gas is denser than air and therefore heavier and would normally flow under air, but that is in a dense cloud. Diffused in air, hydrogen sulfide gas would mix and travel with the air currents. 3. How often can the unit sample? The unit samples continuously. 4. What are the costs and equipment involved with remote calibration of the unit? Calibration of the unit requires the use of two bottles of gas. One is Oxygen and the second would be the gas being metered, in this case hydrogen sulfide. The calibration involves the metering of each gas for approximately 30 seconds. The oxygen for zero calibration, and the hydrogen sulfide for metering calibration. The hydrogen sulfide gas is canistered at 40 ppm. Due to the reactivity of the hydrogen sulfide the gas quickly loses concentration. Therefore the hydrogen sulfide gas bottles are only good for approximately 9 months of storage. The remote calibration of the unit would involve a radio or wire hookup and the proper software. A price was not associated with remote calibration equipment, but there would be a difference in the software required. 5. When the unit is installed does it come with support to train staff on its use? U 0 0 1 Yes, the units can be sold separately or with the manufactures support services. The H: \GRP13\PDATA \28537 \WPWIN\MEMO\H2S_ODR3.WPD 5 HYDROGEN SULFIDE ODOR DETECTION MEMORANDUM PC 7. 0 support services would include software installation setup and a training session on the software. Can the data be stored and then downloaded at anytime? Data would be transferred realtime to the remote personal computer operating on a lawnworks software package. Can the unit operate on a battery? Yes, the unit requires less than less than 4mA of power to operate and may be run from a maintained battery charge or from a 110 volt electrical power supply with the use of an AC to DC power rectifier and step -down transformer to convert to 24 volt. Where will the data be transmitted? Data transmitted from the samplers could be transferred to any data logging device that is available to the City which can take a 4 -20 mA signal or a 4 -9 kHz signal. Does the City need equipment to receive the data? Yes, the City would more than likely require a radio telemetered system, to transmit the data from the samplers to the City's offices where a personal computer could interpret, log, and record the data with the use of the proper software. u0' }2C H: \GRP13\PDATA\ 28537 \WPWIN \MEMO\ff2S_ODR3.WPD V HYDROGEN SULFIDE ODOR DETECTIONMFMORANDUM t TA $L F. 1 Safety 263 COMMON DANGEROUS GASES ENCOUNTERED IN WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEMS AND AT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS' Explosive Specific Range (% by Gravity volume in air) Common Properties Physiological Effects Simplest and P or Vapor Chemical Density" Lower Upper (Percentages below are percent in air (Percentages below are percent in air Most Common Cheapest Safe Name of Gas Formula (Air = 1) Limit Limit by volume) by volume) Sources in Sewers Method of Testingt Oxygen O 1.11 Not flammable Colorless, odorless, Noma] air contains Oxygen depletion Oxygen deficiency indicator. z (In Air) tasteless, non- 20.93% of OZ. If O, from poor ventila- poisonous gas. Sup- is less than 19.5 %, tion and absorption ports combustion. do not enter space or chemical without respiratory consumption of protection. available O2. Gasoline CSH„ 3.0 to 1.3 7.0 Colorless, odor Anesthetic effects inhaled. Leaking storage tanks, discharges 1. Combustible gas indicator. Vapor to 4.0 noticeable in 0.03% Flammable. when 2.43% rapidly fatal. from garages, and 2. Oxygen defi- C,Hp Explosive. 1.1 % to 2.2% commercial or home ciency indicator dangerous for even dry- cleaning for concentrations short exposure. operations. over 0.3 %. Carbon CO 0.97 12.5 74.2 Colorless, odorless, Hemoglobin of Manufactured CO ampoules. Monoxide non- irritating. blood has strong fuel gas. Tasteless. affinity for gas Flammable. causing oxygen Explosive. starvation. 0.2 to 0.25% causes unconsciousness in 30 minutes. Hydrogen H2 0.07 4.0 74.2 Colorless, odorless, Acts mechanically Manufactured Combustible gas indicator. tastless, non- to deprive tissues of fuel gas. poisonous, flam- oxygen. Does not mable. Explosive. support life. A Propagateg Tae simple asphyxiant. rapidly; v ry dangero Methane CH, 0.55 5.0 15.0 Colorless, tasteless, See hydrogen. Natural al g 1 Combustible gas odorless, non- fuel ash 9 9• 9 indicator. poisonous. Flam- gas found in sewers. 2. Oxygen defi- mable. Explosive. ciency indicator. Hydrogen H2S 1.19 4.3 46.0 Rotten egg odor in small concentrations Death in few minutes at 0.2 %. from Petroleum fumes r. 2. H2S ampoules. Sulfide but sense of smell Paralyzes gas found in sewers. rapidly impaired. respiratory center. Odor not evident at high concentrations. Colorless. Flam- mable. Explosive. Poisonous. Carbon CO, 1.53 Not flammable Colorless, odorless, non- flammable. Not 10% cannot be endured for more Issues from carbonaceous strata. Oxygen deficiency indicator. Dioxide generally present in than a few minutes. Gas found in sewers. dangerous amounts Acts on nerves of unless there is respiration. already a deficiency of oxygen. Nitrogen NZ 0.97 Not flammable Colorless, tasteless, See hydrogen. Issues k strata. Gas a iOnd aen deficiency odorless. Non- flammable. Non- found in sewers. poisonous. Principal constituent of air (about 79 %). Ethane C2 H, 1.05 3.1 15.0 Colorless, tasteless, See hydrogen. Natural gas. Combustible gas indicator. odorless, non- poisonous. Flam- mable. Explosive. Chlorine Cl, 2.5 Not flammable Greenish yellow Respiratory irritant, Leaking pipe Chlorine detector. Odor. Strong Not explosive gas, or amber color liquid under irritating to eyes and mucous mem- connections. Overdosage. ammonia on swab pressure. Highly branes. 30 ppm gives off white fumes. irritating and causes coughirig. penetrating odor. 40 -60 ppm danger - Highly corrosive ous in 30 minutes. in presence of 1,000 ppm apt to be moisture. fatal in few breaths. Sulfur SOZ 2.3 Not flammable Colorless compressed Respiratory irritant, Leaking pipes Sulfur dioxide detector. Strong Dioxide Not explosive liquified gas with a irritating to eyes, and connections. ammonia on swab 1 n �-1 ,-� I 0 ; 1 _ pungent odor. Highly corrosive in presence skin and mucous membranes. gives off white fumes. of moisture. Gases with a specific gravity less than 1.0 are lighter than air; those more than 1.0 heavier than air. t The first method given is the preferable testing procedure. ' Originally printed in Water and Sewage Works, August 1953. Adapted from "Manual of Instruction for Sewage Treatment Plant Operators" State of New York RASA Product Inf6rmation y� oar' i r C C Q Q Cy • • MSXs new generation of gas monitoring systems. Ultimo Gas Monitor MSA's Ultimo Gas Monitor is a completely self - contained unit designed for the detec- tion of combustible gases, toxic gases or oxy- gen. The Ultima Monitor can be connected to MSA's DAN® 2001 Digital Network System, Model 5000 or 6000 Instruments, Toxgard® Monitors or to a user's own readout device. In addition, the Ultima Gas Monitor can operate completely stand alone with its LCD display, alarm indications and optional relay outputs. Features The advanced features of the Ultimo Monitor provide benefits never before available in a remote sensor /transmitter: • Automatic calibration that elimi- nates errors due to differences in procedures. • Calibration at pre- determined time /date -with no manual inter. vention when used with Ultimo Auto -Col Module. in Date of last successful calibra- tion recorded within the Ultima Monitor. • Optional Internal relay contacts for FAULT, WARNING and ALARM. • Three levels of alarm including relay outputs when used with Ultima Monitor relay module. • Over LEL detection of certain combustible gases. • 'Replace Sensor" indication when sensor nears its end -of -life. • Real time clock for time and date stamping of events. • Logging of minimum, maximum and average gas concentrations over pre - determined time inter- vals- • Selectable lock -out of output sig- nals during calibration to inhibit alarms and control actions. • Digital, multi-drop communication As a complete monitor, the Ultima Gas Monitor can operate independently providing a local dis- play of the gas concentration, along With an analog output, alarm indices. tions and optional relay outputs. Design All Ultima Gas Monitors, regard- less of the gas selected for detection, are housed in a rugged, aluminum, epoxy - coated condulet enclosure. With the sensor mounted external to the enclosure, it is easily replaced by simply unscrewing the sensor hous- ing and removing the plug -in sensor. No tools are ever required. With its extremely low power con. sumption (less than 4mA nominal), the toxic and oxygen sensors can operate on a single twisted pair of wires, with high immunity to RFl and EMI. All Ultima Monitors are shipped with an external wiring harness and are factory calibrated, making them ready for installation and immediate operation. The Ultima Monitor's unique design eliminates all paten. tiometers, jumpers, switches or any other type of internal adjustment. In fact, there is never a need to open the enclosure during installation and start-up. Applications Ultimo Monitors can be applied in any application where there is o threat of the build -up of combustible gases, the presence of toxic gases, or oxygen deficiency. Ultima Monitors ore suitable for indoor and outdoor applications in virtually any type of industry includ. ing refineries, chemical and petro- chemical facilities, steel mills, water and waste water, mining, and gener- al industry. Assemblies can be specified as ex losion -Proof or installed intrinsi- cally safe for use in Class 1, Div I, Group B, C, D areas and are rated N EMA 4X. Combustibles The Ultima Monitor combustible gas model features MSA's 1 -S cot - alytic detector. The 1 -S detector has proven to be extremely stable and reliable. It also exhibits a high immu- nity to silicones, sulfurs and chlori- nated compounds that shorten the life of, or poison other combustible gas detectors. The combustible model also has the ability to detect certain com- bustible gases above the LEL (lower explosion limit). High concentrations of combustible gas replace the oxy- gem necessary to catalytically bum the gas at the sensor. As a result, a sensor may show an ambiguous or what appears to be a normal read- ing, creating a potentially dangerous condition. The Ultima Monitor eliminates this potential problem, distinguishing it from all other catalytic combustible gas detectors. C.41 C Toxics and Oxygen C r Most Ultima toxic and oxygen models feature electrochemical cells manufactured by MSA. Built-in The Ultima Gas Monitor is the ultimate gas monitor for use in refineries, chemical and petro- chemical, steel mills, water and waste water, mining and general industrial applications. temperature compensation enables proper operation over the entire operating range. All Ultima assemblies are shipped with a unique Sensorgard which pro- tects the sensor from dirt, water, etc., while allowing gas to penetrate into the unit. The Sensorgard also ads as a baffle in windy environments. Operation Ultima Monitors normally operate in the diffusion mode, but also can be used with the Ultima Sampling Module in applications where R is necessary or more convenient to draw a sample from a remote location. With the remote sensor version, sensors and transmitters can be sep- arated for installations where access to the sensor may be difficult. Outputs All Ultimo Monitors come stan- dard with an LCD display for local indication of gas readings or any other stored parameter. Ultima Gas Monitors have several types of output options. Frequency or multiplex out- puts allow for communication specifi- cally to MSA Instruments. Milliamp outputs can be connected to MSA Instruments or a user's own readout device. Additionally, with the optional internal relays, contads are provided for both WARNING and ALARM lev- els. A normally- energized Trouble relay also provides a contact output for any condition that would not be considered NORMAL by the Ultima Gas Monitor. Alternately, any Ultima Gas Monitor can be specified with a digi- tol output for connection to MSA's DAN 2001 Digital Network System for gas monitoring. While all of the information stored in the Ultimo Gas Monitor can be accessed locally for viewing on the front panel LCD, many times it is desirable to have the capability to view this information, setup parame- ters, change alarm levels, etc at o central location. The DAN 2001 C;.0 Digital Network System accomplishes these tasks and many others, includ- ing: multi -drop communication, common system relays and many others.(See Data Sheet 1600 -08 for more information about about MSA's Digital Network System. Calibration Although the Ultima Gas Monitor features tremendous stability, it is essential, as with all gas monitors, that it be calibrated periodically with the gas of interest to ensure proper operation. The Ultimo Monitor reduces the possibility of human error when per- forming a calibration. Simply activate the calibration mode and follow the instructions on the LCD display. It instructs the user when to apply zero and span gas. The Ultima Monitor automatically makes any necessary adjustments. There's no guesswork with the Ultima Gas Monitor. The actual gas readout is displayed dur- ing calibration. When calibration is complete, the Ultima Monitor automatically returns to normal operation. For convenient record keeping, the Ultima Monitor date stamps the lost successful calibration. With use of the optional Auto -Cal Module, calibration gas can even be permanently connected. The calibra- tion process then takes place at des- ignated time intervals, eliminating any manual intervention. Two types of calibration commu- nication devices are available for the Ultima Monitor. The Ultima Monitor's Calibrator and Controller both pro- vide a digitally encoded signal for non - intrusive calibration and access to the advanced features. This patented technique eliminates tools as well as the need to open the enclosure during installation, set up, or calibration. When the Ultima Monitor is locat- ed in hazardous areas, there is no need to de- classify the area, which saves time and improves safety. This eliminates possible access by unou- thorized personnel, unlike competitive units which can be accessed by mag. nets or flashlights for calibration. Calibrator I The Ultima • Monitor Calibrator offers the industry's simplest method of calibration. It is on i easy -to -use, three - button device that allows colibration and address change of the Ultima Monitor. The Ultima Monitor Calibrator is available for those who do not need to access the Ultima Monitor's advanced features. Controller When access to all of the Ultima Monitor's features is desired, there is no need to upgrade or pur- chose the advanced features. - The Ultimo Monitor Controller provides complete access to all features through its full- function keypad. The controller is used to: • Set the real time clock • Set alarm levels • Change span -gos values • Display - date of lost calibration • Display - minimum, maximum and average gas values • Change address • Set future calibration time /date in addition to providing basic cal - ibrotion functions. It is completely possword- protected. Both the calibrator and controller are UL- approved as Intrinsically Safe. Either can be used to commu- nicate with all Ultima Monitors; therefore, only one (1) is needed, regardless of how many Ultima Monitors you have. U1 • fimcr Gas Monitor specifications Gas Types Combusn'oies; oxygen; toxic! Temperature Range Toxic, and oxygen: -20' to 4-:0" C .4' to 112' F (Range on come Maoris may differ.) Cambustibler. 10° to +9C'C to -194° F Drift Zero Orift: <5%lyr., ypicclly Span Drift: <I0%1yr„ typically Noise less than 'I% FS Accuracy Repeotobiiiy: = 1% FS or 2 ppm Linearity: 2 *6 FS (Combustible; 02; CO) x 10% FS or 2 ppm (whers) Step Change Response T20 02 & toxic <12 sec. (Typ. 6 sec.) T50 O= & toxic! <30 sec. (Typ. 12 sec-) T50 Cambustioles <8 sec. T90 Combustibles <20 sec- Humidity 0 -95% RH, men condensing Sensor Life Combustibles: 3 years typically Toxic & 02: 2 years typically Full replacement warranty: 1 year Hazardous Area Rating 02 & Toxic: Class 1, Div 1, Group 8, C & 0, NEMA 4X (explosion.preci or intrinsically =Fe models only) Combustibles: Same as above except Group 8 rating not available on intrinsically sane version. Wiring Requirements mA outour., Toxic & OZ: 2 -wire (whhout accessories or sampling modules) Combustibles: 3 -wire Frequency & multiplex outputs: 3 -wira Digital; see Bulletin 1600 -08 Power Input mA versions: Taxies & O : 7 -30 VDC Combustib }e: 7 -30 VDC (P,150 mA maximum Frequency & multiplex versions: Supplied by MSA controllers Digital: See Bulletin 1600 -08 Signal Output 4 -20 mA: 2-wire currant sink -or- 3- wire current source - (combustiblc or Uttima Monitors velh occ=cries or sampling modules) Frequency & multiplex: 4 -9 khz Optional Internal Relays: Trouble, `Naming, Alarm: Digital: see Bulletin 1600 -08 Internal Relay Contact Rating 5 amp Q 125 VAC; 5 amp @ 30 VDC Physical Sze: 5.25'%V x 4.5'D (13.3cm x 11.4cm) Weight: 4.5 lb. (2.041 kg) with optional internal relays: Size: 5.25 -,v x 5.5'0 (13.3cm x I A -0-1 Weighl: 5.0 lb, (2.268 kg) 0 01) 9 `- Optional Modules Relay Module Provides three levels of alarm relay outputs along with a normally energized trouble relay. See Data Sheet 07 -2019. Auto -Cal Module Provides a means `o permanently connect calibration and zero gas. The Ultima Monitor then can be pro- grammed to calibrate itself at pre- determined time and dote. Relay Auto -Cal Module combines the Relay and Auto -Cal Module into a single assembly. See Data Sheet 07 -2020 Sampling Module Provides a method to draw a gas sample into the Ultima t10anitcr. See Octal Sheet 07 -2023. Accessories AC Power Supply For AC- powered operation of an Ultima Gas Monitor Remote Sensor Assembly Allows sensor to be separated from transmitter for difficult to reach installations. Duct Mount tits Provides an easy method to install an Ultima Gas Monitor in a ventila- tion duct. Flow Cap Used when an Ultima Sampling Module or any other type of flow sys- tem is providing the gas sample to an Ultima Gas Monitor. See Data Sheet 07 -2022 for all Ultima Accessories. Ordering Information Ordering Sheet 0730 -00 Represented by: �7 ISO 7RRa4` Nola: This Dula shwf contains only a g4ncr21 dnc+prian of rho MSA Ultimo Gas Moniloring Snlem. White uses and pariarmonce w3abil;41" ere described. under no 6-Gumssanc -3 mould the proaucr be used aeepl by qualirwd. Trained per- annel, and nal until rho gin.- mJCbns, 106444 er ether ti,ualum aeeempany q +he oradua tip. 6~ mMN117 mad end uAckl"ood and 1110 precaurions n,m;n :et Fork fallawed. only riser conrain fie comp1414 and awa0ed Intorma"Om mrcerninq 16is pfeducr. , In U.S, 1- 800- MSA -INST or FAX (412) 776 -3280 JL In Canare, da, 1 -800- 267 -0672 or FAX (416) 663 -5908 Elsewhe MSA International, (412) 967 -3228 or FAX (41 11967-3373 Instrument Division: P.O. Box 427, Pittsburgh, PA 15230 U.S.A. www.MSAmet. cam Dais shoat 07.201s 0 MSA 1997 Printed to U.SA. gTa%L) JUL -20-99 11 :55AM FROWWATER RESOURCES m, T -65T P.06 /11 F-T34 M A Toxg rd a 11 Gas Monitor 0On42 G JUL -20 -90 11:56AM FROM-WATER RESOURCES Toxganf* 11 Gas Monitor t -/ Taxgard Monitors are Used in a val of indvetrioi or commardui appiiccwons- The Monitor is early to install and operate. Just 9PP1Y power to the Toward 11 Gas Monitor and it is ropily to go or use it as a transportable gas mompor with its aptionoll internal battery. The combustible gas Twm!xrd 11 Monitor requires just a simple correction fe its remote sensor. ti 0��1� i' Applications Twoord 11 Monitors can " applied 'n any opp�on where there is o threat of the build , of combugibie 005M. the p�enw - rosic gases, or aeggen defiGtriCy Twgard tl Monitan are sub able for ;ndcor and outdoor aPpl'rcad0ns i" 'i"Ily any typo of indwrtry indud;nq refineries, clteratiiaal and Petro- cherri'cai fod4tlas, sled mili5, water and "M wetter, mining. and aeneml industry Standard Features • large, four -digit LED display •Three levels of alarm • Large IX13 alarm indicators • Intemal relay Contacts for FAULT, CALMON. WARNING and ALARM• . nt K115de fouh fetal► output - • D,Qgnostics that appear on the display •Audible alarm • 4 to 20 mA output Advanced Features The Wvgrced jeanures of the Tarpord U Mannar provide berMfits rtener bafa"s available in a gas manimr. • Automatic calibration) gnat elirnimm errors due To differences in proeedruss. v Calibration at predetermined timeldcm with no manual in onvenhm when used With Ullima Auta-Col Module. • pate of last a4cessiful aallbration recorded within the Togard 11 Monitor. •'Rapiace Sesser' indication whdn sensor nears in end -of -Gtr. • Real -time clock for time and dale stamping of eventL • Logging of m;nimum, maximum and average gas cascsrmavians ovtr prede+ermined firm kftwls- • Selectable lock -out of autpcn signrals during coUbrotion to inhib t alarms and control actions. • p-Igital. nwiti• drop Communication. pesign T -657 P.02/11 F -734 rsma+irig the plug -in wrisor. NI Twgard tl Monitors are focta c l'.broted, mvldng them ready far installation and immediate aperoWn• The Tt�ard fl Mmn�taer, unique design eliminates all ward o rtersers, a any other type of missal adiustenen+l- AU Ta4ard 11 Gas selected for regardless of the gas deWtwn, arm housed in a rugged, metal endes im d"Uned s fsw KPI � wth the smig ar !mounted (aced by rim enelosurs. ssrrsor using and Phi unscruAr9 the Operation To -gard n Moridors "amok aperale in The d- iifusion made, but also can be spWoed with an internal PrumP in appl'raotians where a ;s neoeswry or more convenient to draw a sample iron a remove 100469n. All Tagard 11 assemblies air shipped with a yn;que Sensa►perd which s the sensor front din, water. eta ..hile aflo.rrng gas to penera'w into tote unit. The 5ensor9ard also ads as a Raffle in Mindy enwronmems. 1KTh the remove sensor wr=ian. sensors and 1►ansrnitros con be separated for ins"llations Where, 000ras In the seraor soy be d;l Mult- outputs All Taspard 11 Monirors Comte standard with a harps 1.7SO = 4111k y for local indication+ P gas readings or arty etFtcr stared porametsr. Addillaftally. relay cams is are pmvWW for CAUTION. WARNING and ' ALARM IeYels. A ttartrwlly energtud Fault may also a contact output for any can an tho would not be aons�dened NORMAL b>! the TQ%wd 11 Gas Monitor. Nwngl*. airy Torgard 11 Gas Monitor can he spocrfied with a digital autp►et far ppnrreaian to MSA s PAW 2001 Digital Nowork SPOM fcw am monjroring While o11 of the fnfornriaawn roared in the T 11 t, w Mertitor can be aaowsed l�for eia"As an the leant pans) C&play. matt' dines it;s dedmble to boo the capobft to view this infcr an. getup poramessrs, change alarm levels. em at a central Women- The DAN 2001 DWW Nwwwk drop communication, atoriurwn q*Vwrn relays and many odmWl. (See Data Sheet 160Q-08 for mom inflOnF11136AM iMW out mainall Hawwk %%mm.) Calibration Although the T=%*rd 11 Gos Mnnar a features ttwnendoAx s0 hlay. it is et>ten- rial. os with all gas monitors, that if be aawsrated Periodically wNs the ppa�ss of interest" ensure proper ope►odo++- The Tagard 11 Mwjw mduoas the powiluffily of human error when PwIlor^� iris a calibradon• Sim pph ate the coG- brovion made and foUaw 00 instructwos an be wren to qppd mom 4 The JUL -20 -96 11:56AM FROM -MATER RESOURCES + T -657 P.10 /11 F -T34 s ! =s• &mply sElac the gas ?a pe montTCrrti. :4 mar roc = =cr- VAJ& baltom f:taun) is the rypicc; seiea ;an, a aide rrounT 0-1don ;s a.adal-Ic F4MC.larly'i frig Tosgard Il Manor ..,A be ut+ed as a Transportable Rol mon;lor- The Mon,lar can then be allow+d To s.t on any flat surfact d..ring 3peration. Aueibler AN units coma standard —ilh a 70 db xona- Tlcrf. A 93 db Federal horn or 95 db 20MAc@ harp rich seltttCfobla outFvr Tenet con be - didcled as an alternate - ir^caa- up To ttno 111 top- tno%ont■d straits can be s4scred to to acli.alad irortt Ate warning and MOM 1e.els- daoar4 provides power in the ergrd inpdf �?awcr to the unit boCamct intelrt:ptcd. NA allows rcr transportable- operation of the unit. :;qi -A Caruri.wni1cw iar.- Allow: Toepard It Mon;tar to operate- an the OAN 20n dig;tal neT.ork. Al mfnr- Minion ;nclud4nq am .slues. slarCd ;i►manan- and -f -up pargntetera Q Then oe displayed or controlled at a ccntrol location. Far more infcrTna- lioa an the DAN 7001 system see pate Sheet 160038. , ;.-I: sr-cl ?,::r.:. for oppliwaons .here it is necessary io draw a sample ro the unit. ■ �ir.:;7e ZZ�� =!ati Maws the Toagard It �rpl to maniTor bnrothing air lines ppically for lew l"s of carbon n.ottax;de. a }Ip..,r czc- Used whr na.er a naTt- pressunmd ads sample ;c to be daliw creel to the aenaor. a Acr..zly- For easy caRtnny ei the unit when Mind a3 a WC(IS noble maniUDr- 0 'Cr! gc+e (not snownl - if it 13 neces- sary to lade lho inCJQWe during oper- adon for sawArt Purpaaa. JUL -20 -96 11:58AM1 FROM-WATER RESOURCES Toxclard Il GasUanitor Specifications rim wi leis, dNYe'r, ios(c+ Z6• io -rso'c io" T w R` -4• to +1227 i mm - ,� 9o•C -40 a 1194 F s T" pt �q c 12 sec. MF6 6 asc.l r,S%lyr., typically Soon prig; �, I awfr.. *Pwa& "our. Low than IS FS 7 SEC =11i PS or 2 prom �soe.riry. C.an, Vie: lit; Col s10% FS or 2 PPM (otl•rS1 s T" pt �q c 12 sec. MF6 6 asc.l TW O= and 10x00 12 34 s� (jyp. teal T40 C&nbl alas c Catnb.tsfite. 7 SEC mueddhip 0.95% Ali. rim- mndtsaw9 � von y l zhu v� mwW' 1 tmu CWWO ftrp a XP Aar rmwr4 y on bo Ireta11e4 in C!a s 1. Div I Orem P~ Inpub 110 -220 VAC P -W i^Plfi �� rifle Vwins Santa Scum sea 6upem 160048 Irdetrnol MlaPsr tam+ Faak. CwAiorb M►erawr9. bomW &.lei>It C•rsW Mdntr• 5 amp ® 125 we: s Snip a 90 VAC "M }T+ I.od acid ms- eatMr>< * irneM alarm , t,r. TadCr. end as: up 1P 24 wi up a olam,am ft fill opriers; d.p.ndig n 5 2 h�sablas Q . r. "Goells. A Aridow el 10"w s l s:"ri s s'li wow," � 13Ibs. 0 IJQ�JC7:i Taatgard II Monitor a~aricolly makm any Masasary adiustmefm. Thae's no ,,,� the Tooagard 11 Gas Monitor. The acival gas readout is dts. Played during ea6bration- 11VIten calibration is wmplere. the Too,gard M1 manimr aummahcally "alarm to normal oparatian. Far convenient record keeping. the Ts„ =War 1 ce�'r1 nnil i �we stumps the Igs1 W,th use of the apponal Awta -Cal Module calibrarian os can even be per - manenijy connected..ihe oo6bnstion r� place ae mntema dim atm9 ny ml in/arvenlion- An itatemal tvva- button Wypad allows aecaSS 10 aU set-ap parameters and stored rapes including inWari n Of eAli- bration. In odditian, two tlrp communication da !ires ore awilabte for the Tanartd 11 Manimr_ The To-4rd 11 Calibn tar and Cont►ollor both proon44 a dippitoly.�d nru ed knol for naarsi" ccGbroian and acres to the advanced fee mm. This paw"d Jahn+q�+a eliRlr notes to& as WWI as th+ r�+ttd to open the ondawre during set up or colibro- tian. Calibrator The Toagerd II CclibsMr Qf �, *" indsitlt's simplest method of p is on eosy�to -use; threr>~ dovin that albws calibration of to TaaWni u Manilas: The Tesgord 11 "ibrator is available far noose who do not need to access the Toaogard 11 Madders advanced feruures. Controller rw Tasgard 11 Controller PfOvidw *g" ,ewe keypad - ures through The wradler is used W. • Set the #=I- time dads Represented bv- MW.res .90. . M i.IM�M.i ��•�rriMr�e!oeM�M�iI In U.S,1.4gq.NGA-WST or PM 41716 -3= In Gaatod4. 1. 800- 3f7 -1i672 or 1FAS l 5900 �61wwMA. �� fo fAX kslp .wo division: P.O. pas 427. Rnburgh, PA 15230 U.SA vww.M5Anet- eon T -657 P.11 /11 F -734 • Set alarm levels • Change "n-Vas vok*s • pivplal - data of last ealibr des" • Display -16wintulr, rrteptinaum and agape lam valwet► • Change address • 5a faslure calibration lim*Vate in addition ra pmvidins basic calibration fu"etions- It is eomplo* password- proheted. Optional Modules Pro +ides a moors to p 1r imnavo calibration and sera Cos- The Tmeard a Maribor then can be pmeromrmed 1a corwan itself w pre- determined tints and dose. Accessories gentata *now Asumd P Alluom Sensor to be separated from transafolur for d'� mm4oicafi installations. Ordering information OnUrWe Shit m Tcmard 11 Manlror's at• tnonufoe wNd using MWs uni4ue AssomMG-To -Order IATO) pros M. This Guam liar 10 select OV of ttw 1'istad o0am in artier 10 ene"your Tahgard It NwW ar W1111les yaur irWwidual reCluitstttemte- ATO Tmgord 11 Monitors ale namm* OT d the same dory the order is M=lved. Tro ezpladed vine' shown on the pnsvious page rrwlres the Pgodion PF=m a simple procedum 1c; Ji —jim- I Con MW OW III pro W"orm"s o rd. aael t+r+to n usw wo4a A F�A_ t CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DATE: August 18,1998 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Boards and Commissions AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: CHMS Park Vista Management Operating Agreement Extension AGENDA DESCRIPTION: The El Segundo Senior Housing Board unanimously recommends extending the Park Vista Management Agreement with Community Housing Management Services for the next two years. Extension beginning January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2000. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1. Approve the proposed addendum to the Management Operating Agreement through December 31, 2000. 2. Approve extending CHMS's contract to manage Park Vista through December 31, 2000 with proposed revisions in their submitted 1998 budget. 3. Direct Senior Housing Board and staff if addendum or contract is not extended. BRIEF SUMMARY: If the El Segundo Senior Housing Board is to go to bid for the management of Park Vista it will require the execution of an RFP immediately. This year the Board is heavily involved in the execution of the Major Maintenance program at Park Vista, leaving little time necessary to oversee the RFP process for the management of the facility. Secondly, with CHMS as the current management company they too are heavily involved in the maintenance projects and serve on the maintenance sub - committee. To change the management company now would be extremely complicate and a possible detriment to the maintenance program. In light of this and CHMS's exceptional cooperation and management of Park Vista for the past four years, the Board voted unanimously to extend their contract for another two years. CHMS proposed to extend the current management services at Park Vista for an additional $100 per month for calender year 1999. This would set their management fee at $2,400 per month. For the year 2000, CHMS proposes $100 additional per month, bringing the fee for that year to $2,500 a month. is providing services on their second extension of the original contract granted in 1994. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENT: The third addendum to the Management Operating Agreement. CHMS Proposal for Property Management Services though 2000 FISCAL IMPACT: YES X_ NO Amount Requested: $1,200 annually Account Balance: Date: FY98 /00 Budget Account Number Appropriation Required: Yes No ORIGINATED: Date: August 18, 1998 Peter Freeman, President El Segundo Senior Housing Board ACTION TAKEN: a:chffmxt2.wpd 00030 D-4 olilanunit C_ Housing Management Services July 22, 1998 Board of Directors El Segundo Senior Citizens Housing Corporation Park Vista Seniors Apartments Subject: Park Vista: Proposal for Property Management Services I Dear Board of Directors: -Community Housing Management Services appreciates the opportunity of serving the Board of Directors, the residents of Park Vista Apartments and the City of El Segundo. We hope to continue this relationship. We are a non -profit housing management company, dedicated to serving low income seniors, families and people with disabilities. This is a proposal to extend the current management services at Park Vista for one and two year options at Park Vista. CHMS proposes to extend the current management services at Park Vista for a consideration of $100 additional per month during the calendar year 1999. This would set the management fee at $2,400 per month, The following calendar year, 2000, CHMS proposes $100 additional per month, bring the fee for the year 2000 to $2,500 per month. Again, we appreciate the opportunity to provide services in support of Park Vista Seniors Apartment. We believe that we can do an excellent job for you in managing the subject property and we look forward to your response to this proposal. Sincerely yours, =Mercr "'I'e Aul� George Executive Director 3375 South Hoover Street # D, Los Angeles, CA 90007 (213) 765 -9612, Fax (213) 765 -9623 000"'r ® / ` EQUAL �u_ r HOUO SING OPPORTUNITY A NON - PROFIT COMPANY THIRD ADDENDUM TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT The El Segundo Senior Citizen Housing Corporation (hereinafter "Park Vista ") and Community Housing Management Services (hereinafter "CHMS ", collectively the Parties ") hereby amend the Management Agreement entered into by the parties on May 6, 1986 (the "Agreement ") as follows: Section 1.3 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: 1.3 TERM. This Agreement shall expire on December 31, 2000, subject to the provisions set forth in Section 19.1 Section 19 'Termination' infra.' All other terms and conditions of the Agreement and any written addenda and /or amendments thereto shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. EL SEGUNDO SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING CORPORATIONS a.k.a. PARK VISTA By: Peter Freeman, President Date: 00032 COMMUNITY HOUSING MANAGEMENT SERVICES By: George A. Mercer, Exec. Director Date: TO THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT MEETING DATE: August 18,1998 AGENDA HEADING: COMMITTEES Agenda Description: Schedule Interviews of candidates for Community Cable Advisory Committee and Recreation & Parks Commission ( "CCBs "), with filing deadline set for 48 hours prior to interviews. Recommended Council action: Set date of interviews for approximately 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, September 1, 1998. Introduction and Background: City Council opened the recruitment of candidates for Community Cable Advisory Committee on July 7, 1998, with date of interviews scheduled for August 4, 1998. Due to time constraints, only interviews for candidates to the Planning Commission were held on August 4th. The opening on the Recreation & Parks Commission is as a result of the resignation of Michael Kretzmer who was appointed to the Planning Commission on August 4th. Discussion: The City is currently recruiting to fill the following vacancies on the City's committees, commissions and boards. Commissions Committees & Boards # & expiration of Vacancies / Applications Received to date Community Cable Advisory Committee 1 position exp 10/31/98 one Recreation & Parks Commission 1 position exp 06/30102 one The vacancies are being advertised in the Community Calendar section of the El Segundo Herald, on Community Cable T.V. Bulletin Board, and on the City's Water bills. Attached Supporting Documents And Who Prepared Them: Fiscal Impact: N/A Originator': Date: August 11, 1998 Julia Abreu Mason, Council Assistant Date: August 11, 1998 Reviewed by: nAeWsetintrw.998 uo1,-i_3 D -5 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCILMEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Reports AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Appropriate $350,000 and approve the LAX Intervention Project for $1,225,000 as discussed by City Council July 21, 1998. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1. Appropriate the transfer of funds to the LAX Intervention budget. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: In response to a growing concern that the proposed LAX Master Plan alternatives may have a detrimental effect on the quality of life in El Segundo, the City Council launched the LAX Master Plan Intervention project in 1997. As a result, the FY 1997 -98 Budget included an initial appropriation of $400,000 and a mid -year adjustment of $350,000 to retain the necessary legal and strategic planning services. Given the increasing degree of project complexity and growing number of issues, the City Council budgeted an additional $475,000 in the FY 1998 -99 budget, but only allocated $125,000 at that time. At the July 21, 1998 City Council meeting, the entire project was discussed including the $1,225,000 budget. The funds required to fully fund the project total $350,000. DISCUSSION: The City Council LAX Master Plan Intervention Subcommittee has reviewed the budget and has recommended appropriating the full amount in anticipation of planned expenditures during FY 1998 -99 For reference purposes, Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger have been retained to provide the necessary legal services for the project. The firm has in turn retained Gladstein & Associates to address critical policy and communication strategies. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: FISCAL IMPACT: $350,00 Operating Budget: $750,000 in 97 -98: $1.25,000 in 98 -99 Capital Improvement Budget: N/A Amount Requested: $875,000 Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number: 2901 -6406 Project Phase: Appropriation Required: Yes: $350,000 from General Fund undesianated ��vATED : , Date: �` _ .. _.. - • - - - _ �Z /yam BY: Date: TAKEN: 0 00 213 4 D'` � I I N N N I I I N I I ; N a I I, 11 N I1' N N c*i W W I Y III II � �I N N < < � I r- 0. O SON N i Ul U dc 7 IL. \ C I IC • I } W J > 10. g gIIO C i •IiA V V O O ¢ > O a Cl- ¢ ' I LL O' cc O MI I I I O o.T O !f ^ !M U1 'Ma I O ^ MM iO O MIIO IAIf (FU .O N I I cu o ^oo�aDloF1.11o.0oM!MO I I I '' F D NIA M N M .a I N M iN *! M M L-MMj O!m M. 10 I O I II 2. D N I ? 0 I p i W K • N ~ O N T c W I++ W 10 „~,� I V LL Z� O ¢ O N W. Q Wi',� 2 LL h qI ...+ A U N � A U > p z W LU 0 t • Z;W W .� ►• D!93 O C V M A 01 C c , < ZLL Z MII 1 'O O U i 2G'ZO02 H VnOi h' W >5> !•Ow C c " orLLU�o< Zcuoc,LLLL c o u zC ='Z�uWil�r- j WLLatWNUf %.� G L LL0:jxlu X W F•'J N Z,2 O t 111 u •,r.•. W •< A A r ZF A LL O L'J O'W W MM J04WO50=4 -J" W ZZ U O u W. WUr .a•. N!-CC WI -OWL0. ►+W61YW W G p q • U s W f- LnN O wr+ OFC<�••� O x 2 L U= J= W W+ c O ,UL 'U ul O to C K On. V U V ti CE +. NAM • W'A 4 q v ,A m ¢ M. '.0 ^' 1 7 �O N O�O o o O O O O,^ •- ^'^ ^ M'Ln .4 .04- F .- ^ ^_ ZI <' Z NIA • a: Z' 4I r T I• I� N O ^ .. ^ aI o <JI if IA V LL M F� �. O N M {. q •W 1 .. W�^ �1' ter' ..•O Id• <� Z WT S (. W 2D It z <W z i KOI U� 1L IO IIw L "_" +I! H OI 0 ILL V IOU 3G I � I I N N N I I I N I I ; N a I N I1' N N I Y III II � �I N N � I SON N i dc IL. \ C I IC • I } W W > 10. g gIIO C i •IiA V V O O w iV Iq I� I� O YILL 1 i< m LbJ x c1 A ,11 - E -7 7— b 0+ b \ W e N an o• \ W 0 W W W .- IS h « I.- 0. a Vi M u a J O C CL IL It LL O W a 0 F O� ti M M Nom - M0oov0 ••, o•00 ::� T OO LA LA F'o - oIN LA 0, LA CD M CU M W 7:F 0 LA 0% M F, a SO N N VILA LA M.N LA Z -M + +N +N M D W F M LA LL F 'M M N N M N O Y O m ' O � � C W < 3' PRINTED IN U.S.A. 6 -coo a N I La � } N < W u z N O 4 V L C = O W 9. c •+ Q t v +• h 1w LL z W -- \ L O. 4 3 C 2 Y A •+ O Q 0 4, tl V r 7 u O 0: a W 4 Y- ++ 4 u N V IN 3 r 6-4 « L } K 'Z W C Y✓ t 0 C V — O ,., 3 LL 4 >. .+ L O C Y L 4 L r 3 L O u C -+ « -+ O L 4 Y i Y U 4 N O 4 c fA W ; - L 4. ' Y O> N 4 W IL u > r E N Y w 4 T N Y'10 C L �•+ W O > 4 7 Y 4 tt L C r C U Y Y LII Y h u J D: 4 4 4 I •� 7 A r N O C C c • ✓ O z W W t Y C �+ N m= Y« U 4 •-� 3 tl C 4, > Q> S N✓ L -+ O O. Y N N a c ✓ 4 Y O C h = 0 0 w U 7 4 U C« +, E 4 C,d O O Y L. U O In N O O C �+ N L 4 h M ••• O 9. t ¢ Z 2 1 1 Y C 7 �+ V L Y U Y a >- h 7 .. L 4 4 O 4- u tl u L> Y Y a 3 r z0z LL \aa 3 U u N r • Y- 3 L WaV 4 G••+ OZ< WzZ r -• N L-+ N C N 0 >a 4 « •-- NU -. 3 C h W» 7 w O A 0 4 0 4 E N L C O L hLLU,Z C r q- -Z O L -+ Y Y -+ Y 4> V O Y < W Z Z W zzw c 0 C O 4 -+ L •w L �- W !� N Y 4 E U r1 O L W W Y L O <1A h h V E u N o r • 4 d L 04 4 4 Y r O:O:u WLL O:WNN aN Y ac ✓ 4 3� C 'r !� >-Vtl Y C N U70> > C O 7 x O L U 4 L 4 4 -+� « V O Ord 4 4 >- W hJ O}14 - CE Ix 4 V O Y E Y A> m L Y•-� N� Oc L YA a DC .+M M ZLLhh u Y ► L a u O 4 >-- C a4 3 c -+ z W • IL «+ ►+ _ .+ C L u L. 0 C L Y W 0- V E 0 4 r Y 9 DaLL JLJ W A r 10 O Y a 4 L aY- U U Y Y }OW U. W CC W - + uJJ 3 C ••- V4- r Oa > 'a 06 7 x 4 N > �• O> h H m m r •-� ►• V 4 r L< O Y a 4 r 3 •-� in a- 0 Y1 J< LL W J ►+ i/i << U LL O L r N •-� -+ r 4 L U ✓'.'U V •+ L s <-+ aQ J¢aa 4 4 rU a 4 O-+ 4 U -� Y L a L) cz U h h 0: -+. W Z z '�- >- N L C S. •� E L tl 4• 4 L 4 r r t 4 a WOW = -+WmYW W co u o Y 4 Vw u u W 'Yr W4 z to (A L D. h< C[ o. 0. O 4 V U C E O G c C C tl 4 C✓ Y 4 i W U) V) O Q < - 0 x X L L L 4 4 >- Y 3 C Y 4 ✓1 L O C a C✓ C N rn UD <<u u3-1 3 W W C O 3 4 L O4 r OO C OE C« u o s-Y 4 Y r W} w Or UL U 0. 1. LU 4 4., G. «C U U r 0 L O Y L N E V a r ✓ Y o L W 4 L ✓ 4 r U a W✓ r -•+ 4 i-'9 C r C N L v N L W Q J E -� Y G ••+ 3 C 3 O 3 9 a O C 4 a Y Y 3 N W I D �tnO�-- -�NMNM - - +W LO L 4 3 a4 tl L a4 -� 7 L i E N 10 3 U C`In 000� 0000002 Zw O r E 0 E O •• �- E ••.aw L O r-+ C — Z M M -4 to F F< w Z w 4 i. V O L c C 4 O L N E Y 3 L 4 L 4 9 < F OC w 0< C c O 4 w U 3— O L U 0 4 4 L U. a a 4 14 Z cu In do COJ of O 4 11 U II M A C CO LL P i w .. J < u LL L > 4 O N r- W LL. O O L 4 aY r O H u O -+'a < z Q W - W h L 3 Q 4 h m :LL u •• j tr< z • h Z Y%- L W W 'W zL - --+ w <3 u L 0 L I Q W LL h • h 0 •- o 0 O O w 1< 30 1 r1 `� ( N u -+ O U. r u Ix Y LL < '� 01 S 0 : a 1.._ UU�:�J J City of El Segundo PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER 07/28/98 THROUGH 08/11/98 Date Payee 07/28 Federal Reserve Bank 08/05 Healthcomp 08/10 IRS 08/10 Emp. Dev. Dept. 08/10 Wells Fargo 08/10 W.B.M.W.D. DATE OF RATIFICATION: 08/18/98 TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE: Amount 200.00 905.92 164,782.37 32,768.06 30,000.00 838,066.80 Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by : City Treasurer / Finance Director Description Employee Bond Purchase P/R #2 Weekly eligible claims week ending 08/04/98 Federal Payroll Taxes P/R #3 State Paroll Taxes P/R #3 Fund Transfer for Worker's Comp. Water Payment for June Date Date City Manager Date�l�/�1 1,066,723.15 Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo. MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, August 4, 1998 - 5:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Gordon at 5:05 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Kelly McDowell. ROLL CALL Mayor Gordon - Present Mayor ProTem Jacobs - Present Councilmember Wernick - Absent Councilmember Gaines - Present Councilmember McDowell - Present PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total.) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. NONE CLOSED SESSION: The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, et M.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel); and /or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators as follows: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a)) - In the Matter of the Application of City of Los Angeles, OAH No. L- 9604014 Hill v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 030986 Hughes v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. BC 185210 Senior v. City of El Segundo, WCAB Unassigned Mosleh & Greffon v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 025903 Fenwick v. Civil Service Commission & City of El Segundo, 2 Civil B121282 & Los Angeles No. BSO44667. El Segundo v. Kilroy, LASC Case No. YC 031166 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(b): -1- potential case (no further public statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c): -5- matters. DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) - Status of City Manager recruitment. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957.6) - Meet with negotiator for the General Employees Association (El Segundo City Employees Association) and negotiator for the unrepresented employees. E-8 3 -I- Minutes City Council Adjourned Meeting August 4, 1998 - 5:00 P.M. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) - None. REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION - None. 6:00 p.m. Council opened session for the purpose of interviewing candidates. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS - 1. Interview candidates for Planning Commission and Community Cable Advisory Committee. It was the consensus of the City Council to appoint Michael Kretzmer to the Planning Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2002, and to extend the application period for Community Cable Advisory Committee, scheduling interviews for September 1, 1998 at 5:00 p.m. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. None. ADJOURNMENT at 6:55 p.m. Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk Minutes City Council Adjourned Meeting 0 0 1 3 �) -2- August 4, 1998 - 5:00 p.m. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, AUGUST 4, 1998 - 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Gordon at 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION - Rev. Alexei Smith, Saint Andrew Russian Greek Catholic Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Kelly McDowell PRESENTATIONS - 1. Councilmember Gaines presented commendations recognizing Teen Center's REACT (Recreation Event & Activity Committee for Teens) 1998 Scholarship winners, Derek Ernest, who will attend Harbor College, Jessica Hancock, who will attend Cuesta College in San Luis Obispo, and Tiffany Corallo, who will attend UC Davis. ROLL CALL Mayor Gordon - Present Mayor ProTem Jacobs - Present Councilmember Wernick - Absent Councilmember Gaines - Present Councilmember McDowell - Present PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30 minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. Five (5) individuals addressed Council. 1. In response to Mr. Frank Wong, resident's requests, Mayor Gordon advised that the FAA has not provided the City with question and answer forms; and Interim City Manager, Tim Grimmond, explained the noise complaint form, giving examples of complaints received. 2. Chad Ceretto, 210 W. Acacia, requested to speak on Consent Item No. 9 and urged Council to vote in favor of the project, questioning who would pay the schools' portion of $3,000. 3. Steve Schevlin, El Segundo High School teacher and coach, spoke in support of Consent Item No. 9, felt the parking lot could be used for car washes, and advised of the schools' costs. 0 00 40 Minutes City Council Regular Meeting August 4, 1998 Page 1 4. Joan Trimble, resident, suggested banning certain vehicles from parking on residential streets, requesting feedback on her suggestions regarding limiting parking to one side of street, and extending the red zone on each corner. 5. Terry O'Brian, resident, suggested that the School District may wish to rent its lot on Imperial Highway to residents with large vehicles. A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS. 1. Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only. MOVED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only. MOTION PASSED BY UNANANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent. B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS. 1. Public hearing and authorization for the City Manager, or his /her designee, to commence with the sale of the City owned property located at 160 South Sepulveda Boulevard. Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a public hearing and authorization for the City Manager, or his /her designee, to commence with the sale of the City -owned property located at 160 South Sepulveda Boulevard. He asked if proper notice had been given and if any written communications had been received. Clerk Mortesen, stated that public notice had been given in a timely manner and no written communications had been received by the Clerk's office. Jim Hansen, Economic Development Director, gave a brief staff report. No individuals addressed Council and the public hearing was closed. City Attorney Mark Hensley read the following: RESOLUTION NO. 4079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA DECLARING REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 160 SOUTH SEPULVEDA, EL SEGUNDO TO BE SURPLUS PROPERTY AND ORDERING ITS SALE. MOVED by Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell to adopt Resolution No. 4079, declaring real property located at 160 South Sepulveda, El Segundo to be surplus property and order its sale. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent. X004 t- Minutes City Council Regular Meeting August 4, 1998 Page 2 2. Public Hearing and a Resolution of the City of El Segundo, California, finding the City to be in conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) and adopting the CMP Local Implementation Report, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65089. Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a public hearing and adoption of a Resolution of the City of El Segundo, finding the City to be in conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) and adoption of the CMP Local Implementation Report, in accordance with California Government Code, Section 65089. He asked if proper notice had been given, and if any written communications had been received. Clerk Mortesen, stated that public notice had been given in a timely manner and no written communications had been received by the Clerk' s office. Bellur Devaraj, Engineer, gave a brief staff report. No individuals addressed Council and the public hearing was closed. City Attorney Mark Hensley read the following: RESOLUTION NO. 4080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP), AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION CODE SECTION 65089. MOVED by Councilmember McDowell, SECONDED by Councilmember Gaines, to adopt Resolution No. 4080, finding the City to be in conformance with the Congestion Management Program and adopting the CMP Local Implementation Code Section 65089. MOTION PASSED BY UNANANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent. 3. Public Hearing concerning City of El Segundo Energy Services Performance Contracting Program and award of contract to Landis & Staefa, Inc. (contract amount = $1,641,452). Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a public hearing concerning City of El Segundo Energy Services Performance Contracting Program and award of contract to Landis & Staefa, Inc. (contract amount = $1,641,452). He asked if proper notice had been given and if any written communications had been received. Clerk Mortesen, stated that public notice had been given in a timely manner and no written communications had been received by the Clerk's office. Ed Schroder, Director of Public Works, gave a brief staff report. No individuals addressed Council, and the public hearing was closed. It was the consensus of the Council to select Alternative No. 1, in a contract amount to $2,171,979. Minutes City Council Regular Meeting August 4, 1998 Page 3 ii0r'c�Ll MOVED by Councilmember McDowell SECONDED by Councilmember Gaines to award Contract No. 2615 to Landis & Staefa, Inc., Alternative No. 1, for an Energy Services Performance Contracting Program (contract amount = $2,171,979), with further review of financing in approximately two years. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - 1. Staff recommendation to provide staffing to fill the function of centralized procurement within the Finance Department in the amount estimated at $28,544 for the 1998 -99 Budget. (Annual fiscal impact of $106,140 which is expected to be offset by cost savings and reduced use of legal services Gavin Curran, Assistant Finance Director, gave a brief staff report. City Attorney Mark Hensley read the following: RESOLUTION NO. 4081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SALARY RANGE FOR THE JOB CLASSIFICATION OF PURCHASING AGENT. MOVED by Councilmember Gaines, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs to direct the Human Resources Department to implement the class specification and retain the position of Purchasing Agent within the Business Services Division of the Finance Department. This action will result in an increase of one person in the Finance Department and a budget impact of $28,544 for the 1998- 99 fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, and adopt Resolution No. 4081. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent. 2. Staff recommends that City Council modify their previous 1998 -99 budget action which authorized an increase of one position within the City Clerk I s office, and adjust the overall staff level by a net reduction of one part -time (.5) position for a cost savings of $16,368 during the next fiscal year. MOVED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell, to modify, approve, and authorize Human Resources to retain the services of one full -time Office Specialist assigned to the City Clerk, s Office for the primary purpose of contract management. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent. It was the consensus of Council to review the question of extending this position to full -time at a later date. Minutes City Council Regular Meeting August 4, 1998 Page 4 u V 4 1 ►01 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - Appointments made by the City Council on Tuesday, August 4, 1998 to Committees, Commissions and Boards. It was the consensus of Council to appoint Michael Kretzmer to the Planning Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2002, and to extend the application period for Community Cable Advisory Committee, scheduling interviews for 5:00 p.m., September 1, 1998. It was the consensus of Council to appoint the following members to the Senior Task Force for a period of sixty days commencing after Labor Day: Nick Gerenday Barbara Kessener Mona Wenzel Jack Trystman Donnal McCarthy Helen Blanchard Carlota Guy Shirley Koppelman- Gillig Doris Ottman Loretta Frye It was the consensus of Council to appoint the following members for the Business License Task Force for a period of sixty days commencing after Labor Day: Peter Zimmerman Gary Horowitz Frank Godoy Ken Schofield Ron Fernari Sandra Jacobs Ed Munoz William T. Mason Carl Jacobson Darryl Heath William Bue Tim Grimmond Richard Lundquist Ed Sakurai Bob Mercer Stan Sakauye John G. Gaines Finance Director Revised budget and operational format for the Lakes at El Segundo Restaurant. Jim Fauk, Director of Recreation and Parks, gave a brief staff report. MOVED by Councilmember Gaines, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs to approve the revised budget and operational format for the Lakes at El Segundo Restaurant. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent. E. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business. Minutes City Council Regular Meeting August 4, 1998 Page 5 1. Warrant Nos. 249072 - 249339 on Demand Register Summary No. 02 in total amount of $1,663,214.97, Warrant Nos. 249343 - 249425 on Demand Register Summary No. 30 in total amount of $153,074.12, and Wire Transfers in the amount of $552,634.03. 2. City Council meeting Minutes of July 21, 1998. 3. Agreement No. 2616 providing for three year Memorandum of Understanding between the City Council and the El Segundo City Employees Association and Resolution No. 4082. Fiscal Impact: $272,305 first year total compensation cost. Funds are available in the City, s 1998/99 Fiscal Year Operating Budget for the first year 5 % salary increase. 4. Proposed revisions to the class specification for the mid - management job classification of Deputy City Clerk. 5. Examination plans for designated Personnel Merit System Job Classifications. 6. Proposed class specification and Resolution No. 4083, establishing a monthly salary range for the new job classification of Senior Accountant. Fiscal Impact: Funding for the one position job classification is contained in the Fiscal Year 1998 -99 Operating Budget. 7. Resolution No. 4084 of the City Council, rescinding Resolution Number 3996, and adopting a new resolution approving a new Conflict of Interest Code. : 11 101440_03f 81006ZK93►10 M [o : • K910014110810u 11.191 No 9. PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GAINES. 10. Award of Contract No. 2617 to Damon Construction Company, for the construction of sidewalks north of the Douglas Street Green Line Station (contract amount $239,300), and retain Hayer Consultants to provide construction inspection services at $38 /hour for a not to exceed amount of $20,000.00, Contract No. 2618. Recommendation - 1) Reject apparent low bid by Lobana Engineering as being non - responsive. 2) Award contract to qualified low bidder, Damon Construction Company, in the amount of $239,300.00. 3) Authorize Mayor to execute standard public works construction agreement after approval as to form by City Attorney. 4) Authorize staff to retain Hayer Consultants to provide construction inspection services at $38 /hour for a "not to exceed" amount of $20,000.00. 5) Allocate $13,000.00 to project from the City's Transportation Development Act (TDA) apportionment. �0 -5 4 Minutes City Council Regular Meeting August 4, 1998 Page 6 11. ITEM PULLED DUE TO CONFLICT BY MAYOR GORDON. 12. Disposal of surplus vehicles and equipment. Declare vehicles and equipment surplus and authorize staff to have items sold at auction, or sell for scrap, as recommended. In addition, requesting permission from City Council to allow General Services Manager and Business Services Manager to properly dispose of any items with no salvage value (i.e., broken chairs, etc.) when deemed necessary. Staff will destroy those unsalvageable items to prevent any unnecessary liability to the City. 13. PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR GORDON. 14. Approval of Service Agreement No. 2619 with the City of Redondo Beach /South Bay Youth Project, to provide counseling services to El Segundo youth and families between September 8, 1998 and June 30, 1999 at a cost of $27,498. MOVED by Councilmember Gaines SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell to approve consent agenda items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12, and 14. MOTION PASSED BY UNANANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent. CALL ITEMS FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. 8. Adoption of plans and specifications for construction of a storm drain in the 500 block of Washington Street - Project No. PW 98 -4 (estimated cost = $150,000.00). MOVED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell, to adopt plans and specifications for construction of a storm drain in the 500 block of Washington Street - Project No. PW 98 -4 (estimated cost = $150,000.00) MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOICE VOTE. AYES: MAYOR GORDON, MAYOR PROTEM JACOBS; ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER WERNICK; NOES: NONE; NOT - PARTICIPATING: COUNCILMEMBERS GAINES AND MCDOWELL. 3/0/2. City Attorney, Mark Henson, advised Council consideration of this could be deferred until a full Council was present. Mayor ProTem Jacobs and Councilmember McDowell withdrew their motion, and this item was continued to the City Council meeting of August 28, 1998. 9. Award of Contract No. 2620 to Century Paving, Inc. for improvements to the City parking lot at Main Street and Mariposa Avenue - Project No. PW 97 -25, and approve of a transfer of $28,000.00 savings from the recently completed fiscal year 1997 -98 sewer mains repair project. Authorize Staff to request payment of $3,000.00 for the project from the El Segundo High School car wash organizers. (contract amount $56,906.36). Minutes City Council Regular Meeting August 4, 1998 Page 7 0 G04G Recommendation - 1) Approve transfer of $28,000.00 savings from recently completed FY1997 -98 Sewer Main Repair project. 2) Award contract to lowest responsible bidder Century Paving, Inc., in the amount of $56,906.36. 3) Authorize Mayor to execute the standard public works construction agreement after approval as to form by City Attorney. 4) Authorize staff to request payment of $3,000 for project from the El Segundo High School car wash organizers. MOVED by Councilmember Gaines, SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell, to approve the project and waive the $3,000 fee from the El Segundo High School. MOTION PASSED BY UNANANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent. 11. Authorization of $172,952.49 payment to Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) for preliminary engineering /environmental assessment performed by MTA regarding Del Norte Green Line Station. MOVED by Councilmember Gaines SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell to authorize a payment of $172,952.49 payment to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) for preliminary engineering /environmental assessment performed by the MTA regarding the Del Norte Green Line Station. MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOICE VOTE. AYES: MAYOR PROTEM JACOBS, COUNCILMEMBERS GAINES AND MCDOWELL; NOES: NONE; NOT - PARTICIPATING: MAYOR GORDON; ABSENT COUNCILMEMBER WERNICK. 3/0/2. 13. Purchase of Frame Rate Millennium Bulletin Board System. (Fiscal Impact: $42,359). MOVED by Mayor Gordon, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, to approve of purchase of Frame Rate Millennium Bulletin Board System, Cost $42,359. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent. F. NEW BUSINESS - CITY MANAGER - NONE G. NEW BUSINESS - CITY ATTORNEY - NONE H. NEW BUSINESS - CITY CLERK - NONE I. NEW BUSINESS - CITY TREASURER - NONE 60047 V � Minutes City Council Regular Meeting August 4, 1998 Page 8 J. NEW BUSINESS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCILMEMBERS Councilmember McDowell - Spoke regarding the quality of the Commission/Committee applicants and the difficulty in choosing only one. Councilmember Gaines - Gave a brief report regarding the recent SBCCOG meeting, and Information System study. Councilmember Wernick - Absent Mayor Pro Tem Jacobs - Gave a brief report regarding the recent Southern California FAA task force meeting and announced the web site address: http : / /www.awp.faa.gov /so_cal.ntm. Ms. Jacobs also reported on the Historical Preservation Committee, and referred to a recent contact with a small business owner. Mayor Gordon - Authorization to retain Gladstein & Associates to complete the Downtown Visioning Project. Received Council consensus to award Contract No. 2621 to Gladstein & Associates to complete the Downtown/Visioning Project, in an amount not to exceed $10,000.00; addressed airport issues; a recent Board of Supervisors meeting; referred to a change in the resolution to place the LAX expansion on the November ballot; addressed support expressed by Mayors from Orange and Riverside Counties; and the Bay Cities Diabeites fund raiser. In response to Mayor Gordon's question, City Attorney, Mark Hensley, advised that the former Council approved an extension or amendment to an existing contract, and that this type of specialized service does not need to go through the formal RFP or Bid process. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business On1X - 5 minute limit) Individuals Who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. Two (2) indivudals addressed Council 1. In response to Sandra Mason, resident's question, Interim City Manager, Tim Grimmond, advised that a major pump station is being installed on Franklin. 00048 Minutes City Council Regular Meeting August 4, 1998 Page 9 2. Jane Friedkin, resident, felt the Safety and Noise Abatment Committee meetings should be announced on Cable T. V . ; and that the interview process was not done fairly. MEMORIALS: Della Wise, long time resident. CLOSED SESSION: NONE. The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code §54960, et seq.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or discussing matters covered under Government Code §54957 (Personnel); and /or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators; as follows: Continuation of matters listed on the City Council Agenda for 5:00 p.m., August 4, 1998 under "Closed Session" (if needed). REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required). NONE. ADJOURNMENT at 8:55 p.m. to August 18,1998 at 5:00 p.m. Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk C0�)4 Minutes City Council Regular Meeting August 4, 1998 Page 10 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Adoption of plans and specifications for construction of a storm drain in the 500 block of Washington Street - Project No. PW 98-4 (estimated cost = $150,000.00). RECOMMENDED L11 1 ACTION: Adopt plans and specifications and authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The adopted fiscal year 1998 -99 Capital Improvement Program includes a project to construct a storm drain in the 500 block of Washington Street. There is a low area in the 500 block of Washington Street, north of Pine Avenue. The drainage of this area is currently being addressed by a small catch basin and a ten inch (10 ") diameter pipe within an easement in private properties which discharges the storm water to Kansas Street. The storm water flows in the street until it reaches the storm drain further down Kansas Street. The proposed work is intended to improve the drainage of this area. DISCUSSION: Plans and specifications have been prepared by staff. The proposed work includes construction of a larger (24" diameter) subsurface drain in Washington Street between Mariposa and Pine Avenues and in Pine Avenue between Washington and Kansas Streets. Storm water from the proposed drain will be discharged into an existing storm drain system in the intersection of Pine Avenue and Kansas Street. The total estimated cost of the project, including staff costs for design, inspection and construction contingencies is $150,000.00. Funds for this project have been allocated in the 1998 -99 Capital Improvement Program. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Location map. FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: Capital Improvement Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: No Yes $150,000.00 $150,000-00 $148.000.00 Date: 301-400-8205-8987 - Adoptions of plans and specifications No ORIGINATED: j�,��,g Date: o Eduard Schroder, Director of Public Works ACTION TAKEN: n NACOUNCILTW- AUG18.02 (Monday 8/10/98 9:00 AM) E-9 Ulir��)(; s A -i o � A • � I A Z I�llrliT tT I Le" VISTA of .MrTwo It va{wu R • i • + •� f coacor. R ricMMor. It .+f Maw R s _ w tiar.ar. It N A y y arl.a tS tMCL.M It plus R Sig me& •La.t.t •. L.MRa It ►lew.tT .a wsTLar. Of .IINA.LOW .4 � ctMTtr tt LAV.CI w A — rlvaN R p•cMK Art A patr avt C•Npoom& 1t y Ma.tTTla .au {.t {L y Mal uuv Art .a {Mw{T.r {T. Pegg Arl w ll. wt �ll�rMf ft M N. are Y T i i NOW w.i•Y R w � {t►vlTt.. V z — T3 14I i y � w y • Z ALLIED • WAY s• R Y {M t• Z pa.. OAT .T. own" _ ..t Of avI•TI.0 rd V 0 s a. o r. 5 s I v� MINIM �SIMON O"""M I,l181 Xj _ !�0urll RAM V LDtc r 0 • M tXKt. A.M011T t Kl.\ {t � = Z A .�••••� -• tlpt :.gat � pa AL t f N s n[T110 DttE[• : 1 � � ; LET r--J 1 11 11 11 ��n 5 arm s s o c s s� uCi ^t N i a r �< a .•MILT .: . r--J 1 11 11 11 ��n 5 arm s s o c s s� uCi ^t EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Acceptance of the Roller Hockey Rink (Phase 1) construction in Recreation Park (final contract amount = $55,999.00. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1. Approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $1,000.00. 2. Accept the work as complete. 3. Authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's Office. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: On April 21,1998, the City Council awarded a contract for $54,999.00 to Malibu Pacific Tennis Courts, Inc., for construction of the Roller Hockey Rink in Recreation Park. Phase I of this project included construction of a concrete rink slab and the associated relocation /removal of existing park improvements. DISCUSSION: During construction of the rink slab, an existing irrigation water main not shown on City records had to be relocated to accommodate construction. Additionally, approximately 300 square feet of an existing concrete walkway was removed to facilitate construction. The cost of the above work, which was not included in the original contract, is $1,000.00 for which Change Order No. 1 is being requested. Sufficient funds are available in the project budget and no additional appropriation is necessary for the requested Change Order. All work has now been completed to staffs satisfaction. The final contract amount, including Change Order No. 1, is $55,999.00. Staff recommends City Council acceptance of the completed work. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Notice of Completion. FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: Capital Improvement Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: $55,999-00 $75,000.00 $67,500.00 Date: Acceptance of work No ORIGINATED: &A Date: f� / /Tr f r.5 ,? NACOUNCILTW- AUG18.03 (Monday 8 -10 -98 1:00 PM' E-10 Recording Requested by and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk, City Hall 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT Project Name : Roller Hockey Rink Project No.: PW 97 -32 Notice is hereby given pursuant to State of California Civil Code Section 3093 at seq that: 1. The undersigned is an officer of the owner of the interest stated below in the property hereinafter described. 2. The full name of the owner is: City of El Segundo 3. The full address of the owner is: City Hall, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA, 90245 4. The nature of the interest of the owner is: Public park. 5. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was field reviewed by the City Engineer on 10/6/98. The work done was: Concrete Roller Hockey Rink. 6. On 10/18/98, the City Council of the City of El Segundo accepted the work of this contract as being complete and directed the recording of this Notice of Completion in the Office of the County Recorder. 7. The name of the Contractor for such work of improvement was: Malibu Pacific Tennis Courts, Inc. 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows: El Segundo Recreation Park. 9. The street address of said property is: Dated: Bellur K. Devaraj City Engineer VERIFICATION I, the undersigned, say: I am the City Engineer of the City El Segundo, the declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on , 1998 at El Segundo, California. Bellur K. Devaraj City Engineer N:WOTICE'STW97- 32.NOC (8/5/98) EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Authorize stop signs for eastbound and westbound Pine Avenue at Kansas Street. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Adopt resolution. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The City Council has adopted a master resolution related to traffic and parking controls which establishes certain parking restrictions, truck routes, stop sign controls, railroad grade crossings and one -way streets and alleys. Historically, this resolution has been re- adopted in its entirety if any existing traffic related control is modified or new controls are to be implemented. The most current of these resolutions is Resolution No. 4040 adopted by the City Council on October 21, 1997. DISCUSSION: The City Traffic Committee, comprised of the Public Works and Police Departments, received a request for installation of stop signs for eastbound and westbound Pine Avenue traffic at Kansas Street. Currently Kansas Street has stop signs in both the northbound and southbound directions. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Resolution for adoption. 2. Location map. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Operating Budget: Capital Improvement Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: continued on next page....... Date: ORIGINATED: , f, Date: g��, dua S ro e 'rector o Public Works REXX n Date: 46�ml - - - �%Z /yam Page 1 of 2 PW- AUG18.01 (Monday 8/10/981:00 PM E -11 DISCUSSION: Staff performed an analysis based upon Caltrans Warrant Study requirements for the justification of a four -way stop intersection. The Kansas Street/Pine Avenue intersection did not meet the criteria for the installation of four -way stop signs solely based on this analysis due to existing low traffic volumes and absence of accidents on record at the intersection during the past three (3) years. The Traffic Committee also field inspected the intersection for visibility. Traffic southbound on Kansas Street stops at Pine Avenue before proceeding south of the stop sign. The visibility for this traffic to see the eastbound Pine Avenue traffic is limited by an existing hedge on private property. Eastbound Pine Avenue traffic west of Kansas Street travels downhill towards the intersection. There are two (2) reported incidents of pets being killed in the vicinity of this intersection. Even though the intersection does not warrant four -way stop signs based solely on the Caltrans Warrant Study, the Traffic Committee feels that the particular conditions at the Pine Avenue /Kansas Street intersection warrant additional consideration and mitigation. The Traffic Committee recommends City Council approval to install four -way stop signs at the above intersection. As previously indicated, historically the City has authorized these types of changes by modifying the previous resolution and adopting it in its entirety. The attached resolution continues this practice. The only change to the previously approved resolution is included in Section 5.95 on page 15 of the attached resolution. Page 2 of 2 �; 0 , 5 PW- AUG18.01 (Monday 8/10/981:00 PM) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DEFINING AND ESTABLISHING CERTAIN STREETS AND PARTS OF STREETS IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AS NO PARKING AREA, DIAGONAL PARKING ZONES, NO STOPPING ZONES, TRUCK ROUTES, THROUGH STREETS AND STOP INTERSECTIONS, RAILROAD GRADE CROSSINGS, AND ONE -WAY STREETS AND ALLEYS AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 4040. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. No Parking Areas. The streets or portions streets numbered 1 in the first left hand digit are hereby defined and established as "No Parking Areas" and shall be governed by the provisions of subsections (2) and (4) of Section 10.28.040 of the "EL Segundo Municipal Code." [Where a side of a street is not indicated then the restrictions shall apply to both sides of the street within the limits given.] SUBSECTION 1.1 No Parking At Any Time 1.1.05 ALASKA AVENUE: Douglas St. to Aviation Blvd. 1.1.10 APOLLO STREET: Rosecrans Ave. to Park PI. 1.1.15 BUNGALOW DRIVE: East Side: El Segundo Blvd. to Elsey PI. 1.1.20 CALIFORNIA STREET: Imperial Ave. to Imperial Hwy. 1.1.24 CONCORD PLACE: East Side: Maple Ave. to Sycamore Ave. 1.1.25 CONCORD STREET East Side: El Segundo Blvd. to Grand Ave. 1.1.30 CORAL CIRCLE: Douglas St. to Douglas St. 1.1.35 DOUGLAS STREET: Rosecrans Ave. to Utah St. 1.1.40 DULEY ROAD: Grand Ave. to Mariposa Ave. 1.1.45 ELM AVENUE: Hillcrest St. to 337 feet east of Hillcrest St. 1.1.50 EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD: LEGEND NeFthsile - Portion to be deleted from Resolution No. 4040 Northside - Portion to be added to Resolution No. 4040 North Side: Whiting St. to Virginia St. Concord St. to Richmond St. 1 1.1.55 ELSEY PLACE: SoutSouth Side: Bungalow Dr. to Center St. 1.1.60 FRANKLIN AVENUE: North Side: Richmond St. to Standard St. Eucalyptus Dr. to Center St. South Side: Standard St. to Eucalyptus Dr. 1.1.55 HAWAII STREET: Alaska Ave. to Aviation Blvd. 1.1.70 HOLLY AVENUE: South Side: Richmond St. to Main St. 1.1.75 IMPERIAL AVENUE: North Side: Hillcrest St. to west terminus 1.1.80 IRENE COURT: South Side: Penn St. to west terminus 1.1.85 LAPHAM STREET: East Side: Imperial Hwy. to 280 feet south of Imperial Hwy. West Side: Imperial Hwy. to 350 feet south of Imperial Hwy. 1.1.90 LOMA VISTA STREET: East Side: Franklin Ave. to Mariposa Ave. Maple Ave. to Sycamore Ave. 1.1.95 MAPLE AVENUE: North Side: Hillcrest St. to 100 feet west of Hillcrest Street 1.1.100 MARIPOSA AVENUE: South Side: First alley west of Main St. to Main St. 1.1.105 NASH STREET: Rosecrans Ave. to Park PI. 1.1.110 PARK PLACE: Nash St. to Douglas St. 1.1.115 PALM AVENUE: North Side: Washington St. to Sepulveda Blvd. South Side: Virginia St. to Main St. 1.1.120 PINE AVENUE: North Side: First alley west of Main St. to Main St. South Side: Main St. to Standard St. 2 00f,5'; 1.1.125 WALNUT AVENUE: South Side: Sepulveda Blvd. to 256 feet east of Sepulveda Blvd. 1.1.130 YUCCA STREET: Maple Ave. to south terminus SUBSECTION 1.2 No Parking 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM except Saturday and Sunday 1.2.20 KANSAS STREET: West Side: Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave. 1.2.25 OAK AVENUE: South Side: Center St. to California St. SUBSECTION 1.3 No Parking 10:00 PM to 5:00 AM No Exceptions. 1.3.10 KANSAS STREET: East Side: Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave. 1.3.15 LAIRPORT STREET: Mariposa Ave. to Maple Ave. 1.3.20 MAPLE AVENUE: Sepulveda Blvd. to Nash St. 1.3.25 WALNUT AVENUE: North Side: Sepulveda Blvd. to Selby St. South Side: 256 feet east of Sepulveda Blvd. to Selby St. 1.3.30 SELBY STREET: Walnut Ave. to Imperial Hwy. 1.3.35 HUGHES WAY: Sepulveda Boulevard to Allied Way. SUBSECTION 1.4 No Parking - Street Sweeping Schedule. 1.4.05 ACACIA AVENUE: West terminus to Cedar St. 8 AM to 10 AM Tuesday Pepper St. to Center St. 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday Center St. to east terminus 8 AM to 10 AM Monday 1.4.10 ARENA STREET: Pine Ave. to E/W alley north of Mariposa Ave. 8 AM to 10 AM Friday Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon Monday 1.4.15 BAYONNE STREET: Palm Ave. to Maple Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon Wednesday 1.4.20 BINDER PLACE: . Loma Vista St. to Whiting St. 10 AM to 12 Noon Tuesday 1.4.25 BUNGALOW DRIVE: 1 0 0(")5F 4 8 AM to 10 AM Grand Ave. to 153 feet north 10 AM to 1 PM of Pine Ave. 10 Am to 12 Noon Mariposa Ave. to north 10 AM to 1 PM terminus 1.4.30 CALIFORNIA STREET: 8 AM to 10 AM Holly Ave. to Mariposa Ave. 8 AM to 10 AM Mariposa Ave. to alley south 10 AM to 1 PM of Imperial Ave. 10 AM to 1 PM Alley south of Imperial Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon to Imperial Ave. 1.4.35 CEDAR STREET: 10 AM to 12 Noon Walnut Ave. to Imperial Ave. 1.4.40 CENTER STREET: 8 AM to 10 AM Grand Ave. to Mariposa Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon West Side: 10 AM to 12 Noon Mariposa Ave. to Imperial Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon East Side: Oak Ave. to Imperial Ave. 1.4.45 CONCORD PLACE: West Side: Maple Ave. to Sycamore Ave. 1.4.50 CONCORD STREET: El Segundo BI. to Mariposa Av. 1.4.55 CYPRESS STREET: Walnut Ave. to Imperial Ave. 1.4.60 DUNE STREET: Sycamore Ave. to Acacia Ave. 1.4.65 ELM AVENUE: California St. to Washington St. 1.4.70 EUCALYPTUS DRIVE: Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave. Grand Ave. to E/W alley north of Mariposa Ave. Oak Ave. to Imperial Ave. 1.4.75 FRANKLIN AVENUE: West terminus to Main St. 1.4.80 HILLCREST STREET: South terminus to Imperial Av. 1.4.85 HOLLY AVENUE: Valley St. to Richmond St. Standard St. to Eucalyptus Dr. Penn St. to Lomita St. Maryland St. to Center St. California St. to Sepulveda BI. 1.4.90 ILLINOIS COURT: Mariposa Av. to North terminus 1.4.95 ILLINOIS STREET: Grand Ave. to Mariposa Ave. 1.4.100 IMPERIAL AVENUE: North Side: 4 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday 10 AM to 1 PM Tuesday 10 Am to 12 Noon Friday 10 AM to 1 PM Tuesday 8 AM to 11 AM Thursday 8 AM to 10 AM Wednesday 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday 10 AM to 1 PM Tuesday 10 AM to 1 PM Tuesday 8 AM to 10 AM Wednesday 8 AM to 10 AM Wednesday 10 AM to 12 Noon Friday 10 AM to 12 Noon Wednesday 8 AM to 11 AM Monday 10 AM to 12 Noon Monday 8 AM to 10 AM Friday 10 AM to 12 Noon Friday 10 AM to 12 Noon Tuesday 10 AM to 12 Noon Wednesday 10 AM to 12 Noon Tuesday 10 AM to 12 Noon Thursday 8 AM to 10 AM Friday 8 AM to 10 AM Friday 10 AM to 12 Noon Monday 10 AM to 12 Noon Tuesday 10 AM to 12 Noon Tuesday 5 r GO'J0 a 8 AM to 10 AM Tuesday 8 AM to 11 AM Thursday 10 AM to 1 PM Tuesday 10 AM to 12 Noon Friday 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday 10 AM to 12 Noon West terminus to east terminus 10 AM to 12 Noon South Side: 10 AM to 12 Noon West terminus to east terminus 1.4.105 INDIANA COURT: 10 AM to 1 PM Maple Ave. to south terminus 1.4.110 INDIANA STREET: 8 AM to 10 AM Grand Ave. to Mariposa Ave. 1.4.115 IRENE COURT: Penn St. to west terminus 1.4.120 KANSAS STREET: Grand Ave. to Mariposa Ave. 1.4.125 LOMA VISTA STREET: Binder PI. to Imperial Ave. 1.4.130 LOMITA STREET: Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave. Grand Ave. to 206 feet north of Pine Ave. Mariposa Ave. to Maple Ave. Maple Ave. to Acacia Ave. 1.4.135 MAPLE AVENUE: West terminus to Main St. Center St. to Sepulveda Blvd. North Side: 160 feet east of Penn St. to Center St. South Side: Main St. to Center St. 1.4.140 MARIPOSA AVENUE: West terminus to Hillcrest St. Hillcrest St. to Richmond St. Center St. to Indiana St. North ide: 160 feet east of Penn St. to Center St. South Side: Main St. to Center St. 1.4.145 MARYLAND STREET: El Segundo Boulevard to Franklin Ave Franklin Ave. to 233 feet north of Pine Ave. Mariposa Ave. to north terminus 1.4.150 McCARTHY COURT: Lomita St. to Imperial Ave. 1.4.155 NEVADA STREET: 154 feet south of Pine Ave. to Mariposa Ave. 1.4.160 OAK AVENUE: 5 r GO'J0 a 8 AM to 10 AM Tuesday 8 AM to 11 AM Thursday 10 AM to 1 PM Tuesday 10 AM to 12 Noon Friday 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday 10 AM to 12 Noon Friday 10 AM to 12 Noon Wednesday 10 AM to 12 Noon Monday 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday 10 AM to 1 PM Tuesday 10 AM to 12 Noon Friday 8 AM to 10 AM Tuesday 8 AM to 10 AM Monday 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday 9 AM to 11 AM Tuesday 8 AM to 11 AM Tuesday 10 AM to 12 Noon Monday 10 AM to 12 Noon Thursday 10 AM to 12 Noon Thursday 4 AM to 7 AM Friday 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday 10 AM to 1 PM Tuesday 10 AM to 12 Noon Friday 10 AM to 12 Noon Friday 0 West terminus to Loma Vista St. 8 AM to 10 AM Tuesday Bayonne St. to Main St. 8 AM to 10 AM Tuesday Main St. to Penn St. 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday Center St. to Washington St. 8 AM to 11 AM Monday 1.4.165 OREGON STREET: 383 feet south of Pine Ave. to Mariposa Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon Friday 1.4.170 PALM AVENUE: West terminus to Main St. 8 AM to 11 AM Tuesday Sheldon St. to Center St. 10 AM to 12 Noon Thursday California St. to Sepulveda BI. 8 AM to 11 AM Monday 1.4.175 PENN STREET: Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon Monday Grand Ave. to Holly Ave 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday Pine Ave. to Maple Ave. 8 AM to 10 AM Friday Maple Ave. to Walnut Ave 10 AM to 12 Noon Friday 1.4.180 PEPPER STREET: Maple Ave. to Imperial Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon Friday 1.4.185 PINE AVENUE: West terminus to alley east of Richmond St. 10 AM to 12 Noon Tuesday Standard St. to Sierra St. 10 AM to 12 Noon Thursday Sierra St. to Center St. 8 AM to 10 AM Friday 200 feet west of Nevada St. to Washington St. 10 AM to 12 Noon Monday Illinois St. to Indiana St. 10 AM to 12 Noon Monday 1.4.190 REDWOOD AVENUE: Dune St. to North terminus 8 AM to 10 AM Tuesday 1.4.195 RICHMOND STREET: Holly Ave. to Mariposa Ave. 8 AM to 10 AM Wednesday 1.4.200 SHELDON STREET: Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon Monday Grand Ave. to 378 feet North of Grand Ave. 8 AM to 10 AM Friday Pine Ave. to Maple Ave. 8 AM to 10 AM Friday Maple Ave. to Imperial Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon Friday 1.4.205 SIERRA PLACE: Pine Ave. to Sierra St. 10 AM to 12 Noon Thursday 1.4.210 SIERRA STREET: Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon Monday Grand Ave. to Pine Ave. 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday Mariposa Ave. to Maple Ave. 8 AM to 10 AM Friday 1.4.215 STANDARD STREET: Grand Ave. to Mariposa Ave. 8 AM to 10 AM Friday 1.4.220 SYCAMORE AVENUE: West terminus to Main St. 8 AM to 10 AM Tuesday Pepper St. to Penn St. 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday Center St. to Sepulveda Blvd. 8 AM to 10 AM Monday 1.4.225 VALLEY STREET: South terminus to Pine Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon Wednesday 0 1.4.230 VIRGINIA STREET: El Segundo BI. to Imperial Av. 8 AM to 10 AM Wednesday 1.4.235 WALNUT AVENUE: Hillcrest St. to Main St. 8 AM to 10 AM Tuesday Main St. to McCarthy Ct. 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday Maryland St. to Center St. 8 AM to 10 AM Thursday Center St. to Washington St. 8 AM to 10 AM Monday 1.4.240 WASHINGTON STREET: Holly Ave. to Mariposa Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon Friday Mariposa Ave. to Walnut Ave. 10 AM to 1 PM Tuesday 1.4.245 WHITING STREET: El Segundo Blvd. to Palm Ave. 10 AM to 12 Noon Wednesday SUBSECTION 1.5 No Parking 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM and 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM Monday through Friday Except by Permit. 1.5.05 ACACIA AVENUE: Center St. to east terminus 1.5.10 CALIFORNIA STREET: Walnut Ave. to alley south of Imperial Ave. 1.5.15 WALNUT AVENUE: California St. to Washington St. 1.5.20 WASHINGTON STREET: Maple Ave. to Walnut Ave. SECTION 2. Diagonal Parkina Zones. The streets or portions of streets in this city hereinafter described in sections numbered 2 in the first left hand digit are hereby defined and established as "Diagonal Parking Zones" and shall be governed by the provisions of Section 10.32.060 of the "El Segundo Municipal Code." SUBSECTION 2.00 Diagonal Parking Zones 2.10 EUCALYPTUS DRIVE: East Side: 340 feet north of Grand Ave. to Pine Ave. 2.15 HOLLY AVENUE: South Side: Main St. to Standard St. 2.20 LAPHAM STREET: East Side: 50 feet north of 118th St. to 370 feet south of Imperial Hwy. West Side: 400 feet south of Imperial Hwy. to 118th St. 2.25 MARIPOSA AVENUE: North Side: Richmond St. to Main St. 2.30 OAK AVENUE: North Side: Main St. to Eucalyptus Dr. 7 U 0 i�j�' �, 2.35 PINE AVENUE: South Side: Eucalyptus Dr. to 200 feet east of Eucalyptus Dr. Arena St. to Sheldon St. 2.40 RICHMOND STREET: East Side: 190 feet north of Mariposa Ave. to Palm Ave. 2.45 SHELDON STREET: West Side: 80 feet north of Palm Ave. to 55 feet south of Palm Ave. SECTION 3. No Stopping Tow Away Zones. The streets or portions of streets in this city hereinafter described in sections numbered 3 in the first left hand digit are hereby defined and established as "No Stopping Tow Away Zones" and shall be governed by the provisions of Section 10.28.170 of the "El Segundo Municipal Code." SUBSECTION 3.1 No Stopping at Any Time, tow Away. 3.1.05 AVIATION BOULEVARD: East Side: 1566 feet south of El Segundo Blvd. to 124 feet south of 124th St. West Side: 116th St. to Rosecrans Ave. 3.1.10 CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD: El Segundo Blvd. to Mariposa Ave. 3.1.15 DOUGLAS STREET: Utah Avenue to Imperial Highway. 3.1.20 EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD: Richmond St. to Isis Ave. South Side: Isis Ave. to 1 -405 Freeway Southbound ramp 3.1.25 GRAND AVENUE: Illinois St. to Nash St. West city boundary to Loma Vista St. North Side: 125 feet east of Standard St. to Eucalyptus Dr. North Side Center Divider: Main St. to first alley east of Main St. Standard St. to 142 feet west of Eucalyptus Dr. South Side: Standard St. to Eucalyptus Dr. South Side Center Divider: Main St. to first alley east of Main St. 185 feet east of Standard St. to 142 feet west of Eucalyptus Dr. 3.1.30 HILLCREST STREET: Imperial Ave. to Imperial Hwy. 3.1.35 IMPERIAL AVENUE: 0 South Side: 650 feet west of Sepulveda Blvd. to Imperial Hwy. 3.1.40 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY: South Side: Imperial Ave. to east city boundary. 3.1.45 MAIN STREET: Imperial Ave. to Imperial Hwy. 3.1.50 MAPLE AVENUE: North Side: Main St. to 200 feet east of Penn St. 3.1.55 MARIPOSA AVENUE: North Side: Illinois Ct. to Lairport St. Main St. to 200 feet east of Penn St. South Side: Indiana St. to Sepulveda Blvd. 3.1.60 NASH STREET: El Segundo Blvd. to Imperial Hwy. 3.1.65 ROSECRANS AVENUE: North Side: Aviation Blvd. to west city boundary 3.1.70 SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD: East Side: Rosecrans Ave. to Imperial Hwy. West Side: Rosecrans Ave. to Grand Ave. Sycamore Ave. to Imperial Hwy. 3.1.75 UTAH AVENUE: Douglas St. to Aviation Blvd. 3.1.80 VISTA DEL MAR: South city boundary to north city boundary. 3.1.85 WALNUT AVENUE: Washington St. to Sepulveda Blvd. 3.1.90 118TH STREET: Lapham St. to Aviation Blvd. 3.1.95 120TH STREET: 220 feet west of Aviation Blvd. to Aviation Blvd. 3.1.100 UNNAMED right turn connecting roadway from westbound El Segundo Blvd. to northbound Douglas St. 3.1.105 UNNAMED right turn connecting roadway from northbound Main St. to eastbound Imperial Hwy. 3.1.110 UNNAMED right turn connecting roadway from eastbound Imperial Hwy. to southbound Main St. SUBSECTION 3.2 No Stopping Tow Away 6:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM Except Saturday and Sunday. 3.2.05 GRAND AVENUE: Illinois St. to Eucalyptus Dr. Concord St. to Loma Vista St. 9 0 C,G f 3.2.10 MARIPOSA AVENUE: North Side: Lairport St. to Douglas St. South Side: Sepulveda Blvd. to Douglas St. 3.2.15 SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD: West Side: Grand Ave. to Sycamore Ave. SECTION 4. Truck Routes. The streets or portions of streets in this city hereinafter described in sections numbered 4 in "EL Segundo Municipal Code." SUBSECTION 4.00 Truck Routes. 4.05 AVIATION BOULEVARD: 116th St. to Rosecrans Ave. 4.10 CALIFORNIA STREET: Imperial Ave. to Imperial Hwy. 4.15 EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD: Main St. to Isis Ave. 4.20 GRAND AVENUE: West city boundary to Sepulveda Blvd. 4.25 IMPERIAL AVENUE: California St. to Sepulveda Blvd. 4.30 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY: Sepulveda Blvd. to east city boundary. 4.35 MAIN STREET: El Segundo Blvd. to Grand Ave. 4.40 ROSECRANS AVENUE: West city boundary to Aviation Blvd. 4.45 VISTA DEL MAR: South city boundary to north city boundary. SECTION 5. Through Streets and Stop Intersections. The streets or portions of streets, intersections or entrances thereto in this city hereinafter described in section numbered 5 in the first left hand digit, are hereby established as "Through Streets and Stop Intersections" and shall be governed by the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of Section 10.44.020 of the "EL Segundo Municipal Code." SUBSECTION 5.00 Stop Intersections 5.05 ACACIA AVENUE: California St., all entrances. Cedar St., W entrance. Center St., E/W entrances. Cypress St., W entrance. Dune St., S entrance. Eucalyptus Dr., E/W entrances. Hillcrest St., E/W entrances. Loma Vista St., E/W entrances. Pepper St., E entrance. Virginia St., E/W entrances. 10 5.10 ALASKA AVENUE: Douglas St., E /N /S entrances. Hawaii St., S entrance. 5.15 CORAL CIRCLE(N): Douglas St., W entrance. 5.20 CORAL CIRCLE(S): Douglas St., W entrance. 5.25 ELM AVENUE: California St., E entrance. Hillcrest St., E entrance. Washington St., all entrances. 5.30 EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD: Arena St., N entrance. Bungalow Dr., N entrance. Center St., N entrance. Concord St., N entrance. Eucalyptus Dr., N entrance. Kansas St., N entrance. Lomita St., N entrance. Main St., N /E/W entrances. Maryland St., N entrance. Nevada St., N entrance. Oregon St., N entrance. Penn St., N entrance. Richmond St., N entrance. Sheldon St., N entrance. Sierra St., N entrance. Standard St., N entrance. Virginia St., N entrance. 5.35 ELSEY PLACE: Center St., W entrance. 5.40 FRANKLIN AVENUE: Arena St., N/S entrances. California St., N entrance. Center St., E/W entrances. Concord St., E/W entrances. Eucalyptus Dr., N/S entrances. Illinois St., W entrance. Kansas St., E/W entrances. Loma Vista St., N/S entrances. Lomita St., all entrances. Main St., E/W entrances. Maryland St., all entrances. Nevada St., N/S entrances. Oregon St., all entrances. Penn St., N/S entrances. Richmond St., E/W entrances. Sheldon St., E/W entrances. Sierra St., N/S entrances. Standard St., all entrances. Virginia St., N/S entrances. Whiting St., N/S entrances. 11 �� 0 6 5.45 GRAND AVENUE: Arena St., S entrance. Bungalow Dr., N entrance. California St., S entrance. Center St., all entrances. Concord St., all entrances. Eucalyptus Dr., all entrances. Illinois St., N entrance. Indiana St., N entrance. Loma Vista St., N/S entrances. Maryland St., N/S entrances. Nevada St., N/S entrances. Oregon St., S entrance. Penn St., N/S entrances. Richmond St., all entrances. Sheldon St., N/S entrances. Sierra St., N/S entrances. Standard St., N/S entrances. Virginia St., N/S entrances. Whiting St., all entrances. 5.50 HAWAII STREET: Aviation Blvd., W entrance. 5.55 HOLLY AVENUE: Bungalow Dr., N/S entrances. California St., N/E entrances. Center St., W entrance. Concord St., all entrances. Eucalyptus Dr., all entrances. Illinois St., all entrances. Indiana St., all entrances. Kansas St., all entrances. Loma Vista St., N/S entrances. Lomita St., W entrance. Maryland St., E entrance. Richmond St., all entrances. Sepulveda Blvd., W entrance. Sierra St., N/S entrances. Standard St., all entrances. Valley St., E entrance. Virginia St., E/W entrances. Washington St., E/W /N entrances. Whiting St., E/W entrances. 5.60 IMPERIAL AVENUE: California St., E/W /S entrances. Cedar St., S entrance. Center St., E/W /S entrance. Cypress St., S entrance. Eucalyptus Dr., S entrance. 12 Hillcrest St., all entrances. Loma Vista St., E/W /S entrances. Main St., E/W entrances. McCarthy Ct., S entrance. Pepper St., S entrance. Sheldon St., E/W /S entrances. Virginia St„ E/W /S entrances. 5.65 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY: Hillcrest St., S entrance. Lapham St., S entrance. Main St., E to S turn. Selby St., S entrance. 5.70 MAPLE AVENUE: Bayonne St., S entrance. Bungalow Dr., N/S entrances. California St., all entrances. Center St., all entrances. Eucalyptus Dr., all entrances. Hillcrest St., all entrances. Indiana Ct., S entrance. Lairport St., S entrance. Loma Vista St., E/W entrances. Lomita St., all entrances. Main St., all entrances. Maryland St., N/S entrances. Nash St., W entrance. Penn St., all entrances. Pepper St., N entrance. Sheldon St., all entrances. Sierra St., S entrance. Virginia St., E/W entrances. Washington St., all entrances. 5.75 MARIPOSA AVENUE: Arena St., N/S entrances. Bungalow Dr., N entrance. California St., all entrances. Center St., all entrances. Concord St., S entrance. Duley Rd., S entrance. Eucalyptus Dr., N/S entrances. Hillcrest St., N/S entrances. Illinois St., S entrance. Illinois Ct., N entrance. Indiana St., S entrance. Kansas St., S entrance. Loma Vista St., (West) all entrances. Loma Vista St., (East) S entrance. Lomita St., N entrance. 13 F G i, Maryland St., N entrance. Nevada St., S entrance. Oregon St., S entrance. Penn St., N/S entrances. Richmond St., all entrances. Sheldon St., all entrances. Sierra St., N entrance. Standard St., S entrance. Virginia St., all entrances. Washington St., N/S entrances. Whiting St., all entrances. 5.78 McCARTHY COURT: Lomita St., W entrance. 5.80 OAK AVENUE: Bayonne St., E entrance. California St., all entrances. Center St., E entrance. Eucalyptus Dr., N entrance. Hillcrest St., E/W entrances. Loma Vista St., W entrance. Main St., E/W entrances. Penn St., W entrance. Sheldon St., all entrances. Virginia St., E/W entrances. Washington St., all entrances. 5.85 PALM AVENUE: Bayonne St., N entrance. Bungalow Dr., N/S entrances. California St., all entrances. Center St., N /S/W entrances. Hillcrest St. (East), S entrance. Hillcrest St. (West), all entrances. Loma Vista St., N/S entrances. Lomita St., N/S entrances. Maryland St., all entrances. Penn St., N/S entrances. Richmond St., all entrances. Sepulveda Blvd., W entrance. Sheldon St., E entrance. Sierra St., N/S entrances. Virginia St., all entrances. Washington St., all entrances. Whiting St., S entrance. 5.90 PARK PLACE: Apollo St., E/W /S entrances. Douglas St., W entrance. Nash St., E entrance. 14 0 1, G 11 v J 5.95 PINE AVENUE: Arena St., N entrance. Bungalow Dr., N/S entrances. California St., all entrances. Center St., all entrances. Concord St., N/S entrances. Eucalyptus Dr., all entrances. Hillcrest St., E/W entrances. Illinois St., E entrance. Indiana St., W entrance. Kansas St., NHS all entrances. Loma Vista St., all entrances. Lomita St., all entrances. Main St., all entrances. Maryland St., N/S entrances. Nevada Street, E/W entrances. Oregon St., N/S entrances. Penn St., N entrance. Richmond St., all entrances. Sheldon St., N /E/W entrances. Sierra PI., N entrance. Sierra St., S entrance. Standard St., all entrances. Valley St., S entrance. Virginia St., all entrances. Washington St., all entrances. Whiting St., N/S entrances. 5.98 REDWOOD AVENUE: Dune St, E entrance. 5.100 ROSECRANS AVENUE: Apollo St., N entrance. 5.105 SYCAMORE AVENUE: California St., all entrances. Center St., E entrance. Dune St., N entrance. Eucalyptus Dr., E/W entrances. Hillcrest St., EM/ entrances. Loma Vista St., all entrances. Main St., W entrance. Penn St., W entrance. Pepper St., E entrance. Sepulveda Blvd., W entrance. Sheldon St., E/W entrances. Virginia St., all entrances. Washington St., all entrances. 5.110 UTAH AVENUE: Douglas St., E entrance. 15 5.115 WALNUT AVENUE: Bungalow St., N/S entrances. California St., all entrances. Cedar St., N entrance. Center St., all entrances. Cypress St., N entrance. Eucalyptus Dr., all entrances. Hillcrest St., all entrances. Loma Vista St., E/W entrances. Main St., E/W entrances. McCarthy Ct., W /N /S entrances. Penn St., E/W /S entrances. Pepper St., N/S entrances. Selby St., N/W entrances. Sheldon St., N/S entrances. Virginia St., -&F all entrances. Washington St., all entrances. SECTION 6. Railroad Grade Crossings. The railroad grade crossings in this city hereinafter described in sections numbered 6 in the first left hand digit are hereby defined and established as "Railroad Grade Crossings" and shall be governed by the provisions of Section 10.44.020 (c) of the "EL Segundo Municipal Code." SUBSECTION 6.0 Railroad Grade Crossings. 6.05 AVIATION BOULEVARD: 1566 feet south of El Segundo Blvd. -- Southern Pacific No. BBF 499.14. 6.10 DOUGLAS STREET: 170 feet north of Utah Ave. - -A.T. & S.F. No. 2H -14.7. 240 feet north of Utah Ave. -- Southern Pacific No. BBF 499.43. 6.15 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY: Aviation Blvd. - -A.T. & S.F. No. 2H -13.1. 6.20 LAPHAM STREET: 350 feet south of Imperial Hwy. - -A.T. & S.F. No. 2H- 13.2C. 6.40 SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD: 900 feet north of Rosecrans Ave. -- Southern Pacific No. BBF 500.34/C. 6.50 118TH STREET: Aviation Blvd. - -A.T. & S.F. No. 2H -13.4. 6.55 120TH STREET: Aviation Blvd. - -A.T. & S.F. No. 2H -13.6. SECTION 7. One -Way Streets. The streets or alleys or portions of streets or alleys in this City hereafter described in section numbered 7 in the first left hand digit, are hereby established as one -way streets or alleys and shall be governed by Chapter 10.48 of the "El Segundo Municipal Code ". 7.05 Richmond Street - Palm Avenue to Mariposa Ave.(southbound). 7.10 Nash Street - El Segundo Boulevard to Imperial Highway (southbound) 7.15 Douglas Street - El Segundo Boulevard to Imperial Highway (northbound) 16 n (' "1 1 U.! j .._ SECTION 8. Resolution No. 4040 is hereby rescinded. SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said city; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18"' day of August, 1998. Mike Gordon, Mayor ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18`h day of August, 1998, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D. Oensley, City Attorney U N:\RESO'S \TRAFFIC.RSO (Tuesday 8/4/98 2:00 PM) 17 , � r" 1*1 0U v i I 9 p HSVN ilt \ Orr- Al I�v \ O O Z c� W h J W 2 L� N � 10 Ill NOl I VIA ai a LwJ Li Y VINa0�11V0 a VoNne A amnoc�o ®e B = ®BI mul - 09 Iii 1S VNVIONI 1S SION1111 1S NOIONIHSVM Is 'IS IS 'IS 'IS •aa •1 S 'IS Is 1S 'IS 1S M - 'aa It 1S Is 1S 1S '1S 'IS is SVSNVII VINao�I�VO 4 � N003NO Vavn3N A a31N33 W M01VONns IxaVH V11 Vaa31S NN3d N0013HS VN3aV Sn1dAivon3 -- ONVONVIS NIVw ONOwH01a OHOONO3 VINIOVIA ONIIIHM• VISIA VM OI r r J J• a � s s\ V EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Request for approval of two approximately 827.25 square foot wall signs and two temporary banners for Hughes Electronics to be located on the top of the northeast and southeast facing walls of 200 North Sepulveda Boulevard (Sign Plan 98 -21). Applicant: Hughes Electronics. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1) Approve proposed wall signs; and /or, 2) Other possible action /direction. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Hughes Electronics has submitted a request to construct two identical wall signs to be mounted on the top of the northeast and southeast facing walls of 200 North Sepulveda Boulevard (Pacific Corporate Towers), a 20 story office building. The signs would contain the word "Hughes" in a blue color and a "orbit" graphic underneath the letters in a multi -color design. The proposed signs would also be illuminated. Hughes Electronics may also desire to place two smaller temporary banners on the walls of the building while the permanent signs are being fabricated. DISCUSSION: Section 20.60.030 F of the Zoning Code states that any proposed sign over 500 square feet in area requires review and approval of the City Council. The proposed signs would exceed 500 square feet by 400 feet when measured from the perimeter of the text and the orbit graphic. When viewed as separate elements, the letters and orbit comprise 827.25 square feet. The letters by themselves are 517 square feet (9' by 57' -6 "'). The orbit graphic is approximately 309.25 square feet (64' by 59'). However, the signs would take up approximately only 1.8% of each building wall, which is less than the 5% maximum permitted by the Zoning Code. Hughes Electronics and DirecTV currently occupy approximately 10 floors in this building. The City Council has previously approved at least one other large wall sign for a corporate tenant on a large office building. On January 3, 1990, the Council approved two 536 square foot wall signs for Mattel Toys on the top of their building at 333 Continental Boulevard. Those signs occupy approximately 2.2% of each building wall on which they are located. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Request Letter from Hughes Electronics 2. Photo Simulation of Signs 3. Elevation Drawing and Site Plan of the Building 4. Partial Northeast Elevation of Sign FISCAL IMPACT: None. ORIGINATED: Date: 10 August 1998 Fof Bret B. Ber ard, AICP, Dir ning and Building Safety REVIEWED BY: TAKEN: Date: p: \projects\sp98° 1 cr_doc E -12 August 6, 1998 City of El Segundo City Council Members Department of Planning and Building Safety City Hall 350 Main Street El Segundo, Ca. 90245 RE: Pacific Corporate Towers .... Hughes Signage Dear Council Members: Hughes Electronic Corporations respectfully requests approval of the proposed new Hughes Corporate logos for the Corporate Headquarters located at 200 No. Sepulveda Boulevard. The attached elevations, graphic layout and building "mock up" photograph depict size, and visual effect of the actual proposed signage. The design intent of the new Hughes logo at the top of building is to balance the signage with the mass of the building face. We are aware of your code requirements in section 20,603030 page 266 Sign Area and Height. Each building elevation has 45,552 square foot of area, 5% of that area is 2278 square feet. The Hughes logo has a 827.25 square feet of sign area. We understand that this exceeds the 500 square foot provision limitation, but we feel that the sign is tastefully designed for maximum visibility. There are several high rise buildings in El Segundo with signage at the top of the building that is designed in keeping with the size and mass of architectural elements, ie. Direct TV, Mattel, and ATT. On behalf of Hughes Electronics Corporation, I wish to state that we appreciate the support and assistance received from the Department of Planning and Building Safety and thank the City Council for your time and consideration. Sincerel -AW Mark Connors Manager Hughes Corporate Facilities and Administration cc: Bret Bernard, Director Paul Garry, Planner ri r 'I U ELECTRONICS - 61998 PLANNING DIVISION Corporate Offices 200 North Sepulveda Boulevard PO Box 956, El Segundo CA 90245 -0956 (310) 364 -6000 d {Yf ✓' �' 9i ty} Y A y�ra �. •/ +il J� �n i OWN l�b�� Jar � iu0.1 J�E�od l ,R o }9 aSYr �1a' �t �9� 7 t t Y 3*y ylA }/:IXH Yj .➢ )t Y'.t 'k a .141il � dli 7kY ,,r4 i J { _YY y l i i. EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA DESCRI MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda Request for proposals (RFP) and statements of qualifications from qualified consultants to prepare a requisite update of the General Plan Housing Element. Fiscal Impact: Not to exceed $30,000.00. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Authorize staff to solicit proposals from qualified consultants. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The California State Housing Element Law (Government Code Article 10.6) requires cities to revise or update their Housing Elements at least every five years. The City's existing Housing Element was last revised in 1992 (six years ago) as part of an overall General Plan update. Although the subsequent update was (conceptually) due in 1997, the statewide deadline to submit revised Housing Elements was extended twice by the State Legislature: first to June 30, 1998 (by SB 1073) and then, to the current deadline of June 30, 1999 (by SB 320). According to the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), these extensions resulted from budget cut backs which eliminated funding for Council Of Governments (COGs, or in the City's case - SCAG), who are responsible for calculating each locality's share of the regional housing need. Without these figures from the COG's (i.e., SCAG), cities could not revise their Housing Elements and therefore, the revision deadlines were extended. Although the State budget currently has funds allocated for COG's, the budget is currently suspended. Nonetheless, it is anticipated that no further extensions will be made, and that the revised Housing Element is due to HCD by June 30, 1999. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Draft Request for Proposal and Statement of Qualifications. Draft Consultant List FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget:_ Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: $30,000.00 Project/Account Budget: $30,000.00 Project/Account Balance: $30,000.00 Date: Account Number: 001 - 400 - 2701 - 6214 Project Phase: N/A Appropriation Required - Yes_ No�L ORIGINATED: Bret B. Bernard tlP, rector Planninq and Build Date: 4 Aug 1 REVIEWED BY: Date: E -13 Housing Element Update RFP City Council Staff Report August 18, 1998 DISCUSSION: Staff has prepared the attached draft "request for proposals and statements of qualifications" document. The document includes the City's objectives for the project, the scope of services anticipated, the required deliverables, the proposal requirements, as well as the selection criteria and procedure for choosing the consultant. Once staff has received City Council authorization to solicit proposals from qualified consultants, staff will mail the RFP to various consultants who have expressed an interest in receiving the RFP, as well as to those consultants knowingly accredited with preparing General Plans and Housing Element updates. Then, staff will select the top -rated three or four consultants and invite them to discuss their proposals with staff in an interview. From this group, staff will make a recommendation for approval to the City Council to retain one of these consultants. This project to update the General Plan Housing Element was budgeted in FY 1997 -1998 for $30,000.00. Since the project was not initiated last fiscal year (due to the aforementioned extension), it (and the monies) have been carried over to the current budget year, FY 1998 -1999 for the same amount. PAhannaMhouselmhais (J ,o ') U v - DRAFT - Date Name Firm Address City, State Zip Code RE: Request for Proposals and Statements of Qualifications for the City of El Segundo General Plan Housing Element Update Project Dear Sir /Madam: The City of El Segundo is requesting written proposals and statements of qualifications for professional planning services from qualified consultants and firms (hereinafter referred to as "consultant ") to prepare an update of its General Plan Housing Element. The existing Housing Element, which was not certified by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), was last revised in 1992 as part of an overall General Plan update. Copies of the existing Housing Element can be obtained for $3.30 (each) from the City's Planning Division. ♦ General Information The City of El Segundo is located in the Airport/South Bay subregion of Los Angeles County and is 5.46 square miles in size. It is bounded by Los Angeles International Airport to the north, County of Los Angeles and the city of Hawthorne to the east, the city of Manhattan Beach to the south and, the Pacific Ocean and the city of Los Angeles Wastewater Treatment Plant and Scattergood Generating Station to the west. In 1997, it had an estimated resident population of 16,250 and a daytime working population in excess of 60,000 persons. There were a total of 7,190 (known) dwelling units in 1997. ♦ City Objectives The City's objectives include, but are not limited to the following: ✓ Submission to HCD, no less than one month prior to the June 30, 1999 deadline ✓ Conformance with all requirements of the California Government Code Article 10.6 (Housing Element Law) ✓ Consistency with the City's General Plan and the Subdivision and Zoning Code ✓ Certification by HCD DRAFT - r� `v - Page 1 of 5 - v - DRAFT - ♦ Scope of Services Under the overall project management of the Director of Planning and Building Safety, the selected consultant shall provide the following anticipated services: Preparation of radius map and current property ownership list and labels Preparation and mailing of notices for public hearings and workshops Publication of 1/8 page ad in the newspaper and notification of agencies and surrounding Cities Preparation of staff reports and exhibits to the Planning Commission, City Council and workshops Preparation of the drafts and final updated Housing Element document (including tables, graphs, maps, etc.) Preparation of addendums and revisions to any of the above - mentioned documents (revisions shall be presented in a red -line /strike out format) Preparation and mailing of environmental documents (Initial Study, Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, Responses to draft Initial Study comments, Notices of Declaration /Fish and Game Exemption) Attendance and participation at City staff meetings, Planning Commission and City Council ad hoc committee meetings, public hearings, and workshops sk Preparation of miscellaneous letters, memos or other documents as required by City staff ♦ Deliverables All documents, notices, labels and maps mentioned above in the "Scope of Services" section. In addition, all written documents (notices, reports, housing element update, etc.) shall be presented on a floppy diskette in Word 6.0 or Word '97 format, and sent via e-mail, as required by the City. Regular updates of the documents on floppy disk and e-mail shall be provided to City staff as drafts are revised and finalized. Furthermore, the consultant shall provide a project schedule which shows the anticipated time frame for completing each task. The City anticipates a five to six month schedule, with the Housing Element Update submitted to HCD no later than May 1999. DRAFT - �' i - Page 2 of 5 - - DRAFT - ♦ Proposal and Statement of Qualifications The proposal, at a minimum, should include the following information: Name, address, telephone number, facsimile number, and e-mail address of the firm. 2. List of Cities where the consultant has prepared (or is in the process of preparing) a Housing Element or Housing Element Update within the last eight years. Provide the names and telephone numbers of persons at each City who can be contacted to discuss that particular project. Also, please indicate whether the document was certified by HCD and /or legally challenged (if litigation did occur, indicate the outcome, if known). 3. The names and telephone numbers of the consultant's project team, including the name of the project manager, and the subconsultants to be retained by the consultant. Submit the resumes of all personnel (including sub - consultants) to be involved with the project and their specific experiences relative to the preparation of housing elements and environmental documents. The consultant shall also submit an organization chart which shows the reporting relationships of all involved personnel. 4. Consultant's understanding of the project and a description of how the consultant will approach the project. 5. Consultant's qualifications and prior recent experience in preparing Housing Elements or Housing Element Updates for local governments; and, success rate in having these elements /updates certified by the State. 6. Consultant's knowledge of Government Code Article 10.6 (Housing Element Law), specifically those sections referring to Housing Element updates and revisions. Explain how you would apply this statute to the City of El Segundo, taking into consideration the specific goals, policies and standards of this community. 7. Scope of services to be provided with a breakdown of different tasks. It should include a detailed description of the methods of information gathering and analysis to be used in preparing the Housing Element (i.e., How will you approach this project ?), as well as how this method will best meet the City's Objectives. Also, indicate which members of the project team will be responsible for the various task(s) and attendance at meetings. The submittal should also provide a detailed description of any requested material needed from the City. UUr��J DRAFT - Page 3 of 5 - - DRAFT - 8. Consultant's estimated fee for the project, with a not -to- exceed amount. The cost estimates provided by the consultant shall reflect detailed projected man - hours per the scope of services to be provided, including the cost for attendance at meetings, mileage, and projected reproduction costs. This should be accompanied by a list of the hourly rates for each member of the project team, including clerical, and expected subcontractor rates. Cost estimates shall also include contingencies with upper limits. Include all assumptions made in arriving at the quoted figures. 9. Proposed time frame to provide the services starting from the date of receipt of a Notice to Proceed from the City. A short time frame to perform the services is highly desirable. As stated previously, the City anticipates a five to six month schedule. 10. A statement that consultant is agreeable to execute the enclosed City- Consultant agreement and to provide proof of insurance as noted in the agreement. 11. Five references. Include the person's name, title, address and telephone number. Indicate the nature of this professional relationship (i.e., former client, etc.). ♦ Selection Criteria The following factors (not necessarily listed in order of priority) will be among those evaluated by the City during the selection process: 1. City Objectives: The City will evaluate the degree to which the proposal would achieve the objectives for the project. Creative input from the consultant is encouraged along with any additional tasks the consultant believes would further these objectives. 2. Consultant Qualifications: The qualifications and successful experience of the lead consultant and subcontractors are of a high priority to the City. 3. Consultant Ability: The proposal should demonstrate the consultant's ability to complete projects of this type successfully and in a timely manner. 4. Consultant's Understanding of the City of El Segundo: The proposal should demonstrate the consultant's knowledge of the City of El Segundo. "Boiler- plate" or "generic" proposals should be avoided. The consultant should be aware of the specific goals, policies and standards of this community, as well as its locale in the Airport/South Bay subregion, its unique characteristics and its unusual population- housing characteristics. 5. Costs: The proposal must be financially feasible, with reasonability of costs a consideration. DRAFT - Page 4 of 5 - - DRAFT - 6. Compliance: The proposal must demonstrate the consultant's ability to comply with California State law (and all other applicable laws). 7. Completeness: A complete proposal is required for consideration. An incomplete proposal will not be further evaluated and the consultant shall be so notified. Refer to the "Proposal and Statement of Qualifications" section, for proposal requirements. 8. References: References will be checked prior to the interview. ♦ Selection Process All proposals received prior to the submission deadline, and which are complete, will be reviewed for consideration. The proposals are not considered public information and therefore, will not warrant public disclosure. After the City has reviewed the proposals, the three or four top -rated consultants will be requested to discuss their proposals with City staff. This interview will be the basis for making a recommendation for consideration and selection of a consultant to the City Council. After the City Council has directed staff to enter into negotiations with the selected consultant, staff and the consultant shall prepare a draft contract for approval by the City Attorney and the Council. Once the contract is approved by the Council, the contract will be signed by the consultant and the City and the terms of the contract will commence. ♦ Submittal An original and five (5) copies of your proposal (facsimile copies of the proposals will not be accepted) should be submitted by: 5:30 P.M. on Monday, September 21, 1998 to the attention of: Bret B. Bernard, AICP Director of Planning and Building Safety City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 Telephone: (310) 322 -4670 Extension No. 382 Sincerely, Bret B. Bernard, AICP Director of Planning and Building Safety DRAFT - `j 0 j v - Page 5 of 5 - P:\hannah\houseImt\IfP Housina Element Uadate RFP Consultant List AC Martin Partners 811 West Seventh St. Los Angeles, CA 90017 Ph #213 - 683 -1900 Berryman & Hennigar 1688 West Bernado Drive San Diego, CA 92127 Ph #619 -451 -6100 Fax#619- 451 -1694 General Plan preparations and updates. Calthorpe 739 Allston Way Berkeley, CA 94710 Ph #510- 548 -6800 Fax #510- 548 -6848 CBA 747 E. Green Street, #300 Pasadena CA 91101 -2119 Ph #626 - 304 -0402 Fax#626- 304 -0402 General Plans for cities. Connerly & Associates. Inc. 2215 — 21st Street Sacramento, CA 95818 Ph #916 -456 -4784 Fax#916 -456 -7672 Culbertson. Adams & Associates Planning Consultants 85 Argonaut, Suite 220 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Ph #714 - 581 -2888 Fax#714- 581 -3599 'Or'86 Dyett & Bhatia Urban and Regional Planners 70 Zone Street, Suite 100 San Francisco, CA 94107 Ph#415- 957 -2950 Fax#415- 543 -8957 Foothill Proiect Management The Urban Design Center 117 -1/2 28" Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 42 -274 Omar Place Palm Desert, CA 92211 Ph #714 - 434 -9228 Ph #800 - 651 -6277 Sandra Genis Planning Resources 1586 Myrtlewood Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Ph #714 - 754 -0814 Fax#714- 754 -0814 Gruen Associates 6330 San Vicente Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90048 Ph #213- 937 -4270 Fax#213- 937 -6001 J. Lawrence Mintier & Assiociates 1415 20th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Ph #916- 446 -0522 Fax#916- 446 -7520 General Plan or specific plans The Lightfoot Planning Group 702 Civic Center Drive Oceanside, CA 92054 Ph #760 - 772 -1924 G 0158 ' Mooney & Associates 9903 Business Park Avenue San Diego, CA 92131 -1120 Ph #619- 578 -8964 Fax#619- 578 -0573 bmooney @bfma.com Takata Associates 600 Fremont Ave. South Pasadena, CA 91030 -2528 Ph #818 - 799 -7187 Fax#818- 799 -5509 City general plans. Templeton Planning Group 1470 Jamboree Rd., Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Ph #714- 474 -1660 Fax#714- 474 -2016 Thomas Cooke Associates 1944 Embarcadero Oakland, CA 94606 Ph #510 - 437 -8099 Fax#510- 437 -8097 Urban Design Studio 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, CA 92618 Ph #714 - 472 -3505 Fax#714- 472 -8373 General plan elements. Urban Team. The 4343 Crenshaw Blvd., Suite 302 Los Angeles, CA 90008 Ph #213- 291 -5755 Zucker Systems 1545 Hotel Circle South, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92108 -3415 Ph #619- 260 -2680 Fax#619- 260 -1138 General plans. 0 0'1318 p: hanna h\conslst.wpd EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Establishment of a professional services contract with MRH Structural Engineers for professional plan checking services of structural and special high -rise construction projects on an "as- needed" basis. The amount to be paid the Contractor under this agreement is estimated to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000); and, therefore requires City Council review and approval. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of the contract for MRH Structural Engineers. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The annual Professional Services Contract for plan checking services of structural and special high -rise construction projects has been sent to the City Council on an annual basis for its review and approval, given the potential amount, in excess of $10,000, that could be paid for service provision. This year staff is asking Council for approval of a three year contract (instead of a one year contract), which would run through the end of fiscal year 2000/01. The Director of Planning and Building Safety will evaluate our consultant's performance at the end of the first and second fiscal year, and will provide a report of his findings to the City Council. A 30 -day cancellation clause is included in the consultant's contract that will allow us to terminate our professional relationship for any reason. DISCUSSION: For at least the past 10 years, the Building Division has "outsourced" its plan checking (Continued on next page) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Draft Professional Services Contract with MRH Structural Engineers 2. Copies of proposals for contract Plan Check Services from: a. MRH Structural Engineers b. Berryman & Henigar c. Independent Code Consultants d. JAS Pacific, Inc. Consulting Services e. Hayer Consultants Incorporated f. RSM & Associates, Inc. g. International Conference of Building Officials FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget X Capital Improv. Budget: _ Amount Requested: -0- Project Account Budget: $133,500 Project/Account Balance: $133,500 Account Number: 3301 -6214 Project Phase: N/A Appropriation Required - Yes No X No impacts are anticipated to the City's General Fund. All monies expended are collected directly from project applicants. ORIGINATED: Date: 15 July 199ts l Bret B. Bernard, AIC , Di ctor f Planning and Building Safety REVIEWED BY: , Date: Ti rim ond, Interim C ana r ACTION TAKEN: DISCUSSION (Continued) a;,� E -14 Page 2 responsibilities to a third party consultant on an "as needed" basis when the volume of plan submittals became excessive, or for special high -rise or complex projects. This year, in addition to this current method of sending technical and overflow plan reviews to the City's outside contract consultant, as noted at an earlier Council meeting, Staff evaluated two additional ways that these services could be provided to our clients: • Alternative 1: Bring in a plans examiner to provide services, as- needed, from a "temporary agency" such as Willdan Associates. The need for plan review services is intermittent; and as such, qualified plan review personnel may not be readily available when such services are needed. The City cannot be guaranteed that the same plans examiner would be available every time. Thus, additional staff time would be required to bring a new plans examiner "up to speed" on a particular project, or on our methods of conducting business. When field changes are requested, the original plans examiner could be working in another City, and therefore not necessarily available to answer questions or perform the additional plan review. Costs for this service are typically high. Willdan Associates, for example, charges $70.00 per hour for the use of one of their plans examiners, as opposed to the fixed fee (42% of the plan check fee collected by the City) charged by MRH Structural Engineers. Alternative 2: Hire an additional plans examiner as a permanent employee to fill the position that was eliminated (approximately) three years ago, on a part time and /or "as needed" basis. As indicated during the City's budget sessions earlier this year, this plan is currently being evaluated. If the anticipated level of building activity continues, this may be brought back as a formal proposal for the City Council to consider for fiscal year 1998/99. At this time, staff is recommending Council approval for the continued use of an independent plan review service (as we have done for the number of years) to augment the City's in -house plan review services. Staff Recommendation: The Building Division is recommending contract approval to continue our "out- sourced" plan check services, now with MRH Structural Engineers. Structural /architectural and specialized consultant services are provided for under the Building Division line item 6214, "Professional /Technical Specialist ", in the recently adopted City budget. The Building Safety Division has utilized the services of Mohammad Hariri, Structural Engineer, and Randy Harvill, Architect, the two principal owners of MRH Structural Engineers, since the 1995/96 fiscal year in their previous capacity as plans examiners with the City's previous Plan Review Consultant, The Compliance Group (who chose not to submit a proposal this year). Their services have proven superior in every respect and it is recommended that we renew this contract to allow continued excellent support to staff's plan checking efforts. (Letters of commendation are available for review.) The plan check support provided by MRH Structural Engineers has allowed us to quickly expedite the plan review process and has provided the City with convenience and promptness in meeting time commitments to our clients, as set forth in our "Plan Check Performance Standards," and in our Department's Mission Statement. Miscellaneous Plan Review fees are established by City Resolution and are paid by the applicant at the time of plan check submittal. Contract plan review services are provided by our Consultant on an "as- needed" basis. The City receives a bill for actual services rendered on a monthly basis. This procedure has several advantages: • There is no minimum number of plans that the City is required to send to our consultant. • The Consultant is available for pre- construction or other design /construction related meetings, at no additional charge to the City or to the Applicant. • Certain projects can be expedited, as requested and paid for by the applicant. • Additional expertise can be provided for certain complex projects. u Continued, Page 3 Additional plan review can be provided when a back -log occurs (as a result of the loss of two plans examiner positions over the past several years). Technical questions from our clients are handled directly by our Consultant, which minimizes required City staff time. After plans are reviewed by the consultant, they are sent to the architect/designer for corrections. Corrected plans are subsequently returned to the City. The consultant's recheck of the revised plans is at no additional charge to the City. As always, this year's respondents were asked to provide rates for their services: • MRH Structural Engineers has offered to provide plan review services for 42% of the plan check fee, with an hourly rate of $60.00 per hour for miscellaneous projects. • Berryman & Henigar proposes to provide services for 69% of the plan review fee for projects valued greater than $500,000 and for 59% of the plan review fee for projects valued less than $500,000. • Independent Code consultants proposes to provide plan review services for 65% of the plan check fee collected by the City. • JAS Pacific, Inc. Consulting Services proposes to provide plan review services for 49% of the plan check fee collected by the City. • Hayer Consultants Incorporated has offered to provide plan review services for 50% of the plan check fee collected by the City. • RSM & Associates, Inc. provided us with a competitive bid by charging 52% of the Building Permit fee collected by the City. However, they do not carry the $1,000,000 Errors and Omissions insurance as required by the City's standard contract agreement, and therefore, they were disqualified. • International Conference of Building Officials provided us with a competitive bid of 50% of the Building Permit fee collected by the City. However, they have up to a 4 week plan check turn - around time; they do not pick -up and deliver plans; they do not provide accelerated plan services; and their plan review staff is not available for pre- construction meetings (or other design or construction related meetings). • The Compliance Group did not respond to our (repeated) request for proposals. • George Boghossian and Associates Plan Review Services did not respond to our request for proposals. Staff is recommending that the professional services contract for the City of El Segundo be awarded to MRH Structural Engineers based upon: • Prior El Segundo Experience — The principal owners of MRH Structural Engineers have provided architectural and engineering plan review services to the City (as contract employees for the Compliance Group) for the past 3 years. They are well like and respected within our Department and our Community. • Compatibility — The principal owners of MRH Structural Engineers are familiar with the City's plan review process as well as the people who make our system work. • Accessibility — Past experience with the principal owners of MRH Structural Engineers has proven that they are accessible by phone, cellular phone and via internet access. They have always expressed a willingness to meet with the design community, especially during the pre- construction phrase of a project. • Low Bid — Although MRH's bid is slightly higher than that submitted by the International Conference of Building Officials, this is more than offset by MRH's ability to provide plan review services in less than Y2 the time, as well as their ability to provide accelerated plan review services, to meet with our clients here at City Hall, and their timely response to any of this Department's plan checking needs. Three Year Contract This year staff is asking that the Professional Services Contract be approved for three years (instead of a one year contract) to run through fiscal year 2000/01. The Director of Planning and Building Safety will provide the City Council with a brief written evaluation (receive and file) of the Consultant's performance at the end of fiscal year 1998/99, and at the end of fiscal year 1999/00. This Report will contain an evaluation of the consultant's services through the preceding twelve months with a recommendation to extend, or not to extend, the contract for the following year. GO0,' AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 18 day of August 1998, between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and the MRH Structural Engineers., hereinafter referred to as "Consultant ". In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform the services set forth in Exhibit A, "SCOPE OF SERVICES," and made a part hereof. Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to properly perform said services in a thorough, competent and professional manner and shall, at all times during the term of this Agreement, have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law. Consultants shall begin its services under this Agreement on August 19, 1998. Consultant shall complete each of the services set forth in Exhibit A to the City's satisfaction. If the City is not satisfied with any such services, the Consultant shall work on such matter until the City approves of the service. Further, Consultant shall complete the services set forth in Exhibit A strictly according to the schedule provided therein. 2. STATUS OF CONSULTANT. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive NAAGREEMNT.MST -1- il0 .4 direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. Consultant shall not disseminate any information or reports gathered or created pursuant to this Agreement without the prior written approval of City except information or reports required by government agencies to enable Consultant to perform its duties under this Agreement. 3. CONSULTANT'S KNOWLEDGE OF APPLICABLE LAWS. Consultant shall keep itself informed of applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations which may affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall observe and comply with all such laws and regulations affecting its employees. City and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section. 4. PERSONNEL. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant's staff assigned to perform the services hereunder and shall obtain the approval of the City Manager of all proposed staff members performing services under this Agreement prior to any such performance. NAAGREEMNT.MST 0 r) 5. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. Compensation to the Consultant shall be as set forth in Exhibit A , "FEES ", hereto and made a part hereof. Payments shall be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of each invoice as to all non- disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant in 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 6. ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANT. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein or listed in Exhibit A, "Fees ", unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. 7. ASSIGNMENT. All services required hereunder shall be performed by Consultant, its employees or personnel under direct contract with Consultant. Consultant shall not assign to any subcontractor the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written consent of City Manager. 8. FACILITIES AND RECORDS. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, N:IAGREEMNT.MST (,;�C!� =19 costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. 9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement will terminate on or before June 30, 2001. The Director of Planning and Building Safety will provide the City Council with a brief written evaluation (receive and file) of the Consultant's performance at the end of fiscal year 1998/99, and at the end of fiscal year 1999/00. This report will contain an evaluation of the consultant's services through the preceding twelve months with a recommendation to extend, or not to extend, the contract for the following year. 10. COOPERATION BY CITY. All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the work as outlined in the Scope of Services, shall be furnished to Consultant N:IAGREEMNT.MST - 4 - �Cr,,j in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the work to be performed under this Agreement. 11. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall, become the sole property of City. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION /CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. (a) All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization excepting that information which is a public record and subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, Government Code 6250, et seq. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or N:WGREEMNT.MST -5- 00'0106- court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. If Consultant or any of its officers, employees, consultants or subcontractors does voluntarily provide information in violation of this Agreement, City has the right to reim- bursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages caused by Consultant's conduct, including the City's attorney's fees. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and /or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. (b) Consultant covenants that neither they nor any officer or principal of their firm have any interest in, or shall they acquire any interest, directly or indirectly which will conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of their services hereunder. NAAGREEMNT.MST . 0 r, Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having such interest shall be employed by them as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. 13. DEFAULT. In the event that Consultant is in default of any provision of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. 14. INDEMNIFICATION. (a) Consultant represents it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the services and duties agreed to hereunder by Consultant, and City relies upon the skills and knowledge of Consultant. Consultant shall perform such services and duties consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals performing similar service in the State of California. (b) Consultant is an independent contractor and shall have no authority to bind City nor to create or incur any obligation on behalf of or liability against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers (individually and collectively, "Indemnitees ") shall have no liability to Consultant or to any other person for, and WAGREEMNT.MST ;0 005 Consultant shall indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless the Indemnitees from and r against, any and all liabilities, claims, actions, causes of action, proceedings, suits, damages, judgments, liens, levies, costs and expenses of whatever nature, including reasonable attorneys' fees and disbursements (collectiyol y "Claims "), which the Indemnitees may suffer or incur or to which the Indemnities may become subject by reason of or arising out of any injury to or death of any pers n(s), damage to property, loss of use of property, economic loss or otherwise occurring s a result of or allegedly caused by the performance or failure to perform by Consultant f Consultant's services under this agreement or the negligent or willful acts or omission of Consultant, its agents, officers, directors or employees, in performing any of the se If any action or proceeding is brought agai ces under this agreement. the Indemnitees by reason of any of the matters against which Consultant has agreed to indemnify the Indemnitees as above provided, Consultant, upon notice from the CITY, shall defend the Indemnitees at Consultant's expense by counsel acceptable o the City. The Indemnitees need not have first paid any of the matters as to which the ndemnitees are entitled to indemnity in order to be so indemnified. The insurance re uired to be maintained by Consultant under paragraph 15 shall ensure Consultant's bligations under this paragraph 14(b), but the limits of such insurance shall not limit t of this paragraph 14(b) shall survive the liability of Consultant hereunder. The provisions ration or earlier termination of this agreement. The Consultant's indemnification' does not extend to Claims occurring as a result of N:IAGREEMNT.MST 00092 the City's negligent or willful acts or omissions. t 15. INSURANCE. A. Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall provide and maintain insurance acceptable to the City Attorney in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its i agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is td be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than ANIL Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance: broad as: (1) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as (a) Insurance Se Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001). (b) Insurance 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, including or equivalent forms subject to the written app (c) NAAGREEMNT.MST �OIU�J Workers' Co ISIM, Office form Commercial General ices Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025, I of the City. n insurance as required by the Labor Code of State of California and Employer's Liability insuran and covering all persons providing services on behalf of the Consultant and all risks to such persons under this Agreement. (d) Errors and omissions liability i�surance appropriate to the Consultant's profession. (2) of insurance no less than: Minimum Limits of Insurance. c0sultant shall maintain limits (a) General Liability: $1�00,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Com other form with a general aggregate limit is used, ei apply separately to the activities related to this Ag shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (b) Automobile injury and property damage. General Liability Insurance or r the general aggregate limit shall nt or the general aggregate limit lity: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily (c) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation as required by t e Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 p r accident. (d) Errors land Omissions Liability: $1,000,000 per N:u1GREEMNT.MST -10- occurrence. B Other Provisions. Insurance policies requir by this Agreement shall contain the following provisions: (1) All Policies. Each insurance po icy required by this paragraph 15 shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be uspended, voided, canceled by the insurer or either party to this Agreement, reduced i coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior written notice by Certified mail, return r(�ceipt requested, has been given to the City. ,r (2) General Liability and (a) City, its officer , officials, and employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as espects: liability arising out of activities Consultant performs, products and complete operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant, or automo iles owned, leased or hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, or a ployees. (b) Consu ant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect to City, its offic rs, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees or N:IAGREEMNT.MST -11- r U J volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, C�bnsultant's insurance. (c) Consultant's insurance all apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, a ept with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (d) Any failure to provisions of the policies including breaches of provided to the City, its officers, officials, employ (3) Workers' Comoe ply with the reporting or other rranties shall not affect coverage es or volunteers. Liabili Unless the City Manager otherwise agrees i writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its office s, officials, employees and agents for losses arising from work performed by Consulta t for City. C. Other Re uiremen s. Consultant agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this contra ,certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this c ntract have been complied with. The City Attorney may require that Consultant furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Section. he certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copi s of all required insurance policies, at any time. N:VIGREEMNT.MST 1 "010 (1) Consultant shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Consultant provides. (2) Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self- insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims. (3) The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Consultant's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement. 16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement is the complete, final, entire and exclusive expression of the Agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations by any party which are not embodied herein and that no other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. 17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree W AGREEMNT.MST -13- 11010 that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. 18. ASSIGNMENT OR SUBSTITUTION. City has an interest in the qualifications of and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Consultant by this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, neither any complete nor partial assignment of this Agreement may be made by Consultant nor changed, substituted for, deleted, or added to without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment or substitution shall be ineffective, null, and void, and constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including summary termination of this Agreement. 19. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. The terms of this Agreement can only be modified in writing approved by the City Council and the Consultant. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and any attempted waiver shall be void. 20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he /she /they has /have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of his /her /their corporation and warrants and NAAGREEMNT.MST U0105 represents that he /she /they has /have the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 21. TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. This agreement may be terminated by the City, with or without cause, at any time. Notice to terminate this agreement shall be given in writing. 22. NOTICES. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: Cam. Attention: Bret B. Bernard Department of Planning and Building Safety City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, California 90245 Telephone (310) 322 -4670, extension 211 Facsimile (310) 322 -4167 Consultant. Attention: Mohammad Hariri, MRH Structural Engineers 22640 Golden Springs Drive, Unit B Diamond Bar, California 91765 Telephone (909) 860 -1706 Facsimile (909) 396 -8655 WAGREEMNT.MST 60106 The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. 23. SEVERABILITY. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of the other provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHERE OF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. By Title CITY OF EL SEGUNDO By Title ATTEST: Cindy Mortesen City Clerk N:WGREEMNT.MST 6010 -16- APPROVED AS TO FORM: X4 I--, ark D. Hensley City Attorney Exhibit A August 18, 1998 MRH Structural Engineers Scope of Services MRH Structural Engineers shall perform the following professional services when requested by the Director of Planning and Building Safety of the City of El Segundo: • Provide thorough quality code compliance plan reviews according to all adopted and legislated codes and regulations to include reviews of construction documents submitted to the City for: 1. Building Permits 2. Mechanical Permits 3. Electrical Permits 4. Plumbing Permits 5. Grading Permits 6. Non - building structures Permits The above reviews shall include: 1. Analysis of all engineering calculations 2. Evaluation of all technical engineering reports 3. Review of other specifications or documents • Coordination and integration of all separate permits for each project • Advise and consult with the Director of Planning and Building Safety, or staff, regarding potentially unsafe conditions shown or not shown within plans that may not be specifically covered by the Code. Provide recommendations for discretionary decisions that must be made by the Director of Planning and Building Safety • Advise and consult with the Director of Planning and Building safety, or staff, regarding issues of conflicts between adopted Codes and unadopted or other legislated Codes and regulations • Provide the applicant and the City clear and comprehensive corrections lists with deficient items referred to specific Code sections to ensure understanding, reduce project conflicts and resubmissions, and speed the approval process • Provide review, consultation, and corrections follow -up service for each project through final approval. Approval will be by MRH or the City staff at the City's option • Review plans and related documents in an average 10 working days • Review accelerated plans and documents within an average of 5 working days • Attend all per - submittal meeting or discussions requested by the City of El Segundo • Meet with applicants at City offices, or Consultants office, with reasonable notice • Be available to the City and the applicants, Monday through Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and occasionally on the weekend, as required • Return phone calls within 4 hours • Fax plan check correction to the applicants when requested by the City of El Segundo �Oi 08 Exhibit A MRH Structural Engineers August 18, 1998 Page 2 _ Fees • Plan Review: For permit applications where fees are based on project valuation, MRH Structural Engineers shall provide the above service for 42% of the total plan check fees received by the City for each application reviewed, including accelerated fees and any final adjustments due to changes in valuation • Hourly Reviews: For permit applications and follow -up on field change submittals where fees are not based on project, aluation, MRH shall provide the above services for an hourly rate of $60.00 per ho -jr • Additional Services: For additiona; serviqes not described above, upon request and confirmation of available personnel, MRH Structural Engineers shall provide additional = services at hourly rates to be agreed upon for each request • MRH Structural Engineers shall keep an accurate daily record of time worked on all = hourly and accelerated projects and shall make it immediately available to the City, upon request • MRH Structural Engineers shall not charge the City for the time to pick -up or deliver documents, or, travel time to and from meetings MRH Structural Engineers will bill the City within thirty (30) days from the completion of each task. z s .ti u0�,� EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Revised class specification and resolution establishing a new monthly salary range for the job classification of Community Cable Program Supervisor. Fiscal Impact: Funding for the adjusted salary range is included in the Fiscal Year 1998 -99 Operating Budget. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1. Approve Class Specification 2. Adopt Resolution INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: At its June 16, 1998 meeting, City Council directed staff to increase the annual compensation for the job classification of Community Cable Program Supervisor. The compensation adjustment was designed to reflect additional duties and responsibilities falling within the scope of the incumbent's position. The attached class specification reflects the added duties and responsibilities. DISCUSSION: The Community Cable Program Supervisor's position has significantly changed in three areas. With the expansion of cable services, this position takes on the expanded role of training and supervising a significant increase in staff, Including full -time personnel. The position has also taken on the task of administering the City's Community Cable Franchise Agreement and working closely with Time Warner Communications. The third area of increased responsibility is staying current and knowledgeable of changes taking place in the cable television industry. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Class Specification and Resolution FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget:_ Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Date: 7/1/98 Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required - Yes_ Nom_ ORIGINATED: Date: July 31, 1998 Jim F uk, Director of R ation and Parks Bob Hyland, Director of Hu Resources /Risk Management REVIEWED BY: Date: Interim C Cage U 1 i ,VI-OPR E -15 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SALARY RANGE FOR THE JOB CLASSIFICATION OF COMMUNITY CABLE PROGRAM SUPERVISOR The City Council of the City of El Segundo does hereby resolve, declare, determine, and order as follows: SECTION 1. That the City Council approves the following basic monthly salary range for the job classification of Community Cable Program Supervisor (Supervisory and Professional Employees Association Bargaining Unit): STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E $4057.79 $4260.68 $4373.71 $4697.40 $4932.27 SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1998. Mike Gordon, Mayor ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18`h day of August, 1998, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D. H nsley, ity Attorne RES- SLRV.290 u0i .1 Date Adopted: CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COMMUNITY CABLE PROGRAM SUPERVISOR Under general supervision, administrates the City's Community Cable Franchise Agreement; supervises and trains full -time staff; works with community groups and organizations; stays current and knowledgeable of technological changes in the delivery of quality programs; plans, directs, and coordinates the operations of the City's cable television channel; provides staff support to the Cable TV Advisory Committee; assesses and responds to community programming needs; performs related duties as required. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Plans, directs, and coordinates the operations of the City's cable television channel, including scheduling, traffic, publicity, and programming. 2. Establishes and maintains liaison with the Cable TV Advisory Committee national cable organizations, cable companies, production vendors, other government agencies, and the public relating to the cable channel; responds to and addresses public inquiries and complaints. 3. Consults with and provides technical support to other City departments and community organizations on cable production issues. 4. Supervises and participates in programming activities to ensure quality and compliance with FCC regulations; approves all program treatments, scripts, materials, equipment, crew assignment and public access use. 5. Prepares production activity and other reports related to cable channel operations and State and Federal requirements; conducts community surveys and needs assessments regarding programming. 6. Recommends broadcasting policies, procedures, and standards. 7. Develops and assists in the administration of the budget for the cable television channel. 8. Supervises the installation, repair, and maintenance of production equipment. 9. Recommends equipment selection for the cable television production facility. 10. Recruits, trains, assigns and schedules production staff. QUALIFICATIONS GUIDELINES Education and /or Experience Any combination of education and /or experience that has provided the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for satisfactory job performance. Example combinations include a four -year degree with a major in Telecommunications or a related field, and three years responsible experience in the production, direction, and administration of cable television operations, including or supplemented by two years supervisory experience. COMMUNITY CABLE PROGRAM SUPERVISOR Page 2 Thorough knowledge of principles and techniques of long and short -range television programming; sources of public television programs; structure and operations of a cable television system. Considerable knowledge of FCC rules and regulations pertaining to system operations. Working knowledge of the principles and practices of budget preparation; principles of supervision. Ability to direct the operation of the cable television channel in accordance with related regulations and City policies; establish and maintain broadcasting standards; analyze organizational, administrative, and technical problems and adopt effective courses of action; develop and implement effective program procedures; research and develop program ideas and concepts; communicate effectively both orally and in writing; establish and maintain cooperative working relationships. Possession of or ability to obtain a Class C California driver's license and a satisfactory driving record. Possession of a teaching credential is desired. hAWPd0C5%dspeodgty- *PV.wpd 0 ll i EL SEGbNDO CITY COUNCIL A(�---NDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA D MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar Proposed class specification for the new Mid - Management job classification of Business Services Manager and a Resolution increasing the basic monthly salary range by 5 %. Fiscal Impact: Funding for the one - position job classification is contained in the Fiscal Year 1998/99 Operating Budget. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1. Approve Class Specification 2. Adopt Resolution INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The City's recently adopted 1998/99 Fiscal Year Budget reflects the reclassification of the incumbent occupying the job classification of Budget Analyst/Accountant to the job classification of Business Services Manager. The job classification has also been reallocated from the Supervisory and Professional Employees Association to our group of Mid- Management/Confidential employees. DISCUSSION: City Council approval of the proposed class specification is required in order to formally complete the establishment of the new job classification. Council previously approved the basic monthly salary range, $4716 - $5732, at its meeting of July 7, 1998. Adoption of the proposed resolution will provide for a 5% increase to the monthly salary range. This job classification was inadvertently omitted in prior City Manager Morrison's listing of proposed salary adjustments for unrepresented Executive Management and Mid- Management/Confidential job classification, also agendized at Council's July 7, 1998 meeting. Those increases ranged from 2% to 6% and were approved by action of the City Council. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Class Specification Resolution FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget: X Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required - Yes_ No X ORIGINATED: Date: August b, IMS Bob Hyland, Director of Human esources /Risk Management REVIEWED BY: Date: Ti rim ond, Interim City M ager 4;6/Vr ACTION TAKEN: agenda.292 E-16 0011 ge - -Z9� - 0 0/ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE TO CHAPTER 1A2 (MANAGEMENT - CONFIDENTIAL SERIES) OF THE EL SEGUNDO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE WHEREAS, Executive Management and Mid- Management/Confidential level positions are reviewed from time to time by the City Council for possible adjustments to salaries and /or benefits; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Sections 1A2.000 and 1A2.010 of the El Segundo Administrative Code, entitled "Schedule of Classes by Series" and "Basic Salary Schedule" respectively, shall be modified to reflect, effective July 4, 1998, a salary range adjustment as follows: 1. A salary range adjustment of 5% for Business Services Manager. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August 1998. Mike Gordon, Mayor ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18`h day of August, 1998, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk resslry5tsm APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D. Hensley, City Atorney 0 011 1�7-) # . g - 0-� qOq- 00 �k CITY OF EL SEGUNDO BUSINESS SERVICES MANAGER DEFINITION DATE ADOPTED: Under general supervision, coordinates and facilitates the preparation of the City's preliminary and annual operating budgets; assists departments in budget implementation and administration activities throughout the year; plans, organizes and directs the Citywide acquisition of supplies, materials, equipment and services; coordinates and manages the activities of the Business Services Division of the Finance Department in the collection and payment of business licenses and filming permits; performs related duties as required. CLASS CHARACTERISTICS This single - position class is assigned the responsibility to direct the work of division staff; coordinate and facilitate the compilation and formulation activities involved in the City's preliminary and annual operating budgets; the purchasing of materials, supplies and services necessary for proper operation of the City's activities; and the operation and administration of billing and collecting of revenues associated with business licenses and filming permits. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: Coordinates and facilitates the compilation and formulation activities involved in the preparation of the City's preliminary and annual budgets; 2. Serves as liaison to all departments during the preparation of the preliminary and annual budgets and provides technical information and assistance to department directors, managers and support staff; coordinates the orientation and training of operating department staff involved in budget preparation activities; works closely with department staff to insure adherence to established budget preparation guidelines and parameters. 3. Recommends and assists in the implementation of new or revised accounting systems, procedures and records; may participate in the development of computer programs for various accounting analyses; provides for parallel testing and implementation of computer systems. 4. As a project leader, supervises and reviews the work of fiscal and clerical personnel in performing data entry, reconciliations, and other financial record keeping work. 5. Directs the purchase of requisite materials, supplies and equipment to meet the requirements of operating departments of the City; insures cooperative working relationships between major vendors and City departments; oversees the disposal or sale of excess inventories of purchased materials and supplies; maximizes utilization of cooperative purchasing to obtain lower prices through volume purchasing; may make site visits to assess planned needs or resolve problems with installed products; attends demonstrations, bid openings and meetings in and outside the City. J01 1.6 6. Supervises revenue collectors and clerical employees involved in the billing and collection of business license fees and filming permits, determining work procedures, assigning duties, training staff, enforcing City regulations and policies, and promoting work efficiency; works with the City Attorney to interpret the Municipal Code in daily operating procedures; coordinates bringing delinquent business license accounts into compliance and making payment arrangements with businesses where appropriate. Education and/or Experience Any combination of education and /or experience that has provided the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for satisfactory job performance. Example combinations include completion of a four -year college curriculum or equivalent in business administration, accounting, or related field, and four years of professional experience in municipal budgeting, financial analysis, and /or purchasing, including at least one year in a supervisory capacity. Knowledge, Skills and Abilities Considerable knowledge of municipal budgeting and purchasing, and applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and policies governing the accounting and budgetary management of the City; data processing applications and systems related to municipal budgeting and accounting operations, procedures and practices; modern office practices, procedures, methods and equipment; personnel supervision and training. Ability to effectively coordinate and facilitate the preparation of the City's preliminary and annual budgets; perform a wide variety of professional budgeting analysis work; analyze data and draw logical conclusions; direct the activities of assigned staff-, prepare and maintain accurate reports and records; communicate effectively both orally and in writing; establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with department directors, managers and support staff; learn new computer software applications and procedures and identify enhancements to existing systems. Special Requirements Possession of or ability to obtain a Class C California driver's license and a satisfactory driving record. h: \wpdocs\cls- specs \finance\bus- srvs.mgr x; 0 4 17 le. -C;k(7c�- no(( 1 J MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 EL SEPUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Proposed Resolution of the City Council of the City of El Segundo, California, providing a 2% salary increase for the City's part -time temporary employees. Fiscal Impact: $12,630 annualized cost. Funding for the increase is contained in the City's 1998 -99 Fiscal Year Operating Budget. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Adopt Resolution INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The City Council periodically reviews and adjusts hourly pay rates for our approximately 150 part -time employees. The last across - the -board increase for this group of unrepresented employees was 1.64% in August 1995. DISCUSSION: The proposed 2% salary increase will be effective August 15, 1998. One half of one percent of the proposed adjustment would be used to fund the part -time employees participation in the State Disability Insurance (SDI) Program. Coverage under SDI provides valuable protection again off - the -job injuries, illnesses and disabling conditions. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget: X Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required - Yes_ No X _ ORIGINATED: Date: August 6, 1998 Bob Hyland, Director of Huma ources /Risk Management REVIEWED BY: Date: Interim City anager T agenda.291 0 0i1.: E -17 #le- � 9 / - 00 / ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PART-TIME AND TEMPORARY PERSONNEL BASE WAGE & CLASSIFICATION TITLE 2% SALARY INCREASE Effective 8/15/98 Owages.898 !,I U 0 11 <.{ i�� -�'9/ -06�- $8.94 $7.41 $8.15 Administrative Intern Crossing Guard $8.31 $8.72 $9.16 Duplicating Equipment Operator $13.95 n/a n/a Library Page $6.19 $6.82 $7.51 Lifeguard $8.73 $9.62 $10.58 Locker Room Attendant (Pool) $5.81 $6.40 $7.04 Office Aide $6.03 $6.67 $7.35 Playback Operator $5.87 $6.40 $7.04 Pool Manager $14.28 $14.99 $15.75 Rangemaster $20.40 n/a n/a Recording Secretary $14.28 $15.86 $17.45 Recreation Leader $5.81 $6.40 $7.03 Recreation Specialist I $6.87 $7.56 8.304 Recreation Specialist 11 $8.30 $9.14 $10.05 Recreation Specialist 111 $11.92 $12.76 $13.67 Swim Instructor $9.57 $10.53 $11.58 Video Specialist 1 $7.19 $7.9 2 $8.71 Video Specialist 11 $8.73 $9.61 .57 $10:::] Owages.898 !,I U 0 11 <.{ i�� -�'9/ -06�- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR CHANGES TO CHAPTER IA3 (GENERAL GOVERNMENT SERIES) OF THE EL SEGUNDO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE WHEREAS, part-time temporary job classification are reviewed periodically for possible adjustments to salaries. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 1A3.020 of the El Segundo Administrative Code, entitled "Part-Time Temporary Personnel', shall be modified as shown on Attachment 1, to reflect a 2% salary increase for all employees effective August 15, 1998. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 181h day of August 1998. Mike Gordon, Mayor ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18`h day of August, 1998, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk AP ROV AS T FORM: Mark He sley, City Attorney res2cptr.1 a3 y2- a -i-o0__�5 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Request for Proposal (RFP) to Update City Circulation Element. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve the RFP and authorize staff to solicit proposals. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda The present Circulation Element was adopted as part of the City's General Plan in 1992. The traffic data utilized in the development of the Circulation Element was collected in 1988. Since the adoption of the General Plan, staff has received numerous inquiries as to appropriateness of the Element. As a result, funding for the update of the Circulation Element was included in the 1997/98 budget. DISCUSSION: This item was originally presented to the City Council at its meeting of May 19, 1998. At that time, the item was referred back to staff to ensure that the Economic Development Advisory Council (EDAC) was involved in the process. The EDAC discussed the item at their June 23, 1998 meeting (see attached minutes). (Discussion continues on next page....) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Request for Proposal to Update City of El Segundo Circulation Element. 2. Minutes of Economic Development Advisory Council held June 23, 1998. FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: Capital Improvement Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: Yes $45,000-00 $45.000.00 Date: May 6. 1998 2701 -6214 Approve RFP No ORIGINATED: Date: Eduard Schroder, Di of Public Works 7/ R Date: 8/11/98 Page 1 of 2 U 0 k 2! NACOUNCILTW-AUG18.06 (Tuesday8/11/989: E -18 DISCUSSION: (continued) The attached RFP is the same as previously submitted to Council except that the dates have changed as follows: • Proposals due • Selection of consultant team, finalize contract • Project initiation • General Plan Update Ad Hoc Committee Meetings/ Workshops and preparation of Element • Draft Circulation Element • Planning Commission hearings • City Council hearings • Final adoption September 22. 1998 October 20, 1998 November 1. 1998 January- February 1999 March 1999 May 1999 July 1999 August 1999 Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached RFP and authorize staff to solicit proposals. Page 2 of 2 O 1 N: \C0UNCIL \PW- AUG18.06 (Tuesday 10/11/98 9:00 AM) REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL To Update City of El Segundo Circulation Element August 18, 1998 This is a Request for Proposal (RFP) to update the City of El Segundo's Circulation and related Elements of the General Plan and prepare a supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR). BACKGROUND The last update to the Circulation Element occurred in 1992. Since that time, changes have occurred in local state congestion and transportation planning practices. These changes include changes to the projected levels of service and traffic volumes, and changes in regional transportation requirements (e.g., the Congestion Management Plan (CMP)). The process for updating the Circulation Element Update will include the assistance of an experienced, innovative consulting firm or team selected by the City to provide technical expertise, participate in the public process, and prepare the update of the Element. The City expects that the update will require a team with experience in preparing circulation elements and in public facilitation of meetings. The consultant team will report directly to the City staff in preparing the update. The public input process will be an important component of the update. City staff will assist the consultant in organizing the public process, with outreach to encourage the participation of neighborhood organizations, City residents, the Chamber of Commerce, the business community, and others interested parties. City staff and the consultant will be active participants in the public meetings with the Planning Commission, City Council and the public. Proposals for the update to the Circulation Element are due on Tuesday, September 22, 1998, by 5:00 p.m., in the El Segundo City Clerk's Office. It. SCOPE OF WORK The intent of the update is to produce the Circulation Element, and other related Elements for internal consistency, and a Supplemental EIR. Policies should be oriented towards a well balanced, coordinated transportation system that reduces dependence upon the automobile while still providing access for residents, employees, and visitors to the City. The Circulation Element should set out goals and policies which will provide for alternative forms of transportation including, but not limited to, bicycle, pedestrian and transit facilities, while remaining sensitive to impacts in the residential neighborhoods, business areas, and accounting for the impact of new development on the community. U012I. N: \RFP'S \CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98) Specifically, the update to the Circulation Element should consider revising or creating goals, policies and objectives, covering the following areas: • Auto, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit policies • Regional transportation opportunities • Truck routes • Parking • Acceptable levels of service • New technology, including "smart shuttles" and "smart streets" • Alternative fuels • Transportation management to account for opportunities beyond the City's Transportation Systems (TSM) and Demand (TDM) Management Ordinances. • Neighborhood traffic control • Potential for new transit services, including shuttle programs • Analysis of accessibility to transportation for City residents, including low income, elderly and disabled persons • Complete update of maps, including major circulation proposals, functional classification of streets, public transportation and bicycle routes • Financing and Implementation Plan • Preparation of a Supplemental EIR and all related notices and documentation. The consultant team selected to prepare the update will be required to prepare an initial study including providing fact -based explanations to support responses to all items on the checklist as part of the preparation of the EIR once the documentation components of the Circulation Element are better known. • Other tasks as may be recommended by the consultant in the proposal and as further refined by City staff. In addition, the Element should focus on transportation issues with other South Bay Cities Council of Governments ( SBCCOG) cities as part of the Regional Comprehensive Plan with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Work by the SBCCOG and SCAG should be analyzed for applicability to the Circulation Element. The update to the Circulation Element does not include any major changes to the Land Use Element of the General Plan. However, the Circulation Element should incorporate policies consistent with the Land Use and other Elements of the General Plan. Other Elements will also require updating as necessary for internal consistency. NARFP'S \CELEMENT.UP (8111/98) 2 11 01 The update should include an Implementation Plan which translates the policies into actions, sets a time frame for these actions to occur and discusses financing opportunities. !!! TASKS Prepare and draft Circulation Element in compliance with Section 65302(b) of the State Government Code. The Element shall address the extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares in relationship with the City's Capital Improvement Program, transportation route and modes. The following sub -tasks shall be conducted to determine street configuration and capacity:: • Identify all streets and their classification (existing and proposed). • Develop description for each street classification. • Address impacts and mitigation measures regarding high volume traffic flow, parking and access as it relates to response of emergency equipment and vehicles. • Review relevant circulation studies and recent data from all sources. • Document the general location and extent of all transportation routes and facilities. • Document the existing traffic volumes -to- capacity on major roadways within and adjacent to the City. • Document existing lane configurations, right -of -way widths, roadway capacities level of service (LOS), traffic control devices, speed limits, truck routes, bus routes (Torrance Transit, MTA, MAX Transit System and Dial -A- Ride), bicycle routes and pedestrian routes both existing and proposed. • Identify projected roadway deficiencies and recommend improvements attainable within the next 20 years. Those outside the scope of the General Plan should also be considered. Identify possibilities for synchronization of traffic signals. • Evaluate feasibility of eliminating existing Nash /Douglas one -way couplet and return streets to two -way traffic. • Re- evaluate benefit of street extensions (including but not limited to Grand Avenue, Nash Street, and Mariposa Avenue) identified in present Circulation Element. • Identify possible Neighborhood Traffic Calming strategies which could be implemented in future to address local concerns. • Identify possible truck route modifications. IV CIRCULATION ISSUES • Identify all intersections which currently experience congestion as well as those meeting traffic signal warrants. Identify major traffic accident locations. • Estimate the trip generation potential of the current undeveloped or underdeveloped land within the City and sphere of influence. NARFP'S \CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98) 3 u 0 1 � V. VI. Estimate daily traffic volumes and LOS on the circulation systems with the City upon build -out and identify circulation deficiencies as well as required arterial upgrades. Prepare measures to reduce delay times during peak hours including ride sharing, bus, rapid transit and fair share measures for mitigations as part of discretionary approvals. This should be prepared in light of the South Coast Air Quality District requirements and the Congestion Management Plan (CMP). If necessary, estimate air identification of measures to NPDES requirements. SPECIFIC AREAS OF CONCERN pollution and surface water runoff pollution and reduce pollution in compliance with the AQMD and • Sepulveda Boulevard from Imperial Highway to Rosecrans Avenue • Imperial Highway from Sepulveda Boulevard to Aviation Boulevard • Nash /Douglas one -way couplet • Transportation systems interface with LAX and active rail lines (AT & SF and SPRR). • Extension of existing arterials to complete arterial network • Green Line usage and support facilities • Access restrictions on major arterials • All major intersections in the City • Policies regarding residential traffic including safety, speed control, placement of stop signs, street closures and one -way traffic • Expanded traffic lanes and peak hour parking restrictions • Bicycle and pedestrian paths RESOURCES AVAILABLE The City of El Segundo has several resources available to assist the consultant with the preparation of the Element. These include: "Statewide Integrated Traffic Accident Record System" data for 1997. (Includes all reported vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle accidents for 1997). "Citywide Speed Zone Survey" (dated October 1995). (Includes speed surveys for all major streets). "Citywide Traffic Counts" (1998). (Includes traffic counts for all major streets). This data will be provided by the City for the preparation of the Element. NARFFS \CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98) 4 U01ZL • City of El Segundo General Plan - 1992. • City of El Segundo General Plan - Existing Conditions Report - April 1992. • Evaluation of a Traffic Congestion Mitigation Fee - March 19, 1996. • Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3969 - May 21, 1996. VII. TIME LINE AND PUBLIC MEETINGS The following time line is an estimate of the project schedule: • Selection of Consultant team, finalize contract • Project initiation • General Plan Update Ad Hoc Committee Meetings/ Workshop and preparation of Element • Draft Circulation Element • Planning Commission and City Council hearing dates to be decided after staff review of the draft element October 20. 1998 November 1. 1998 Januarv- February 1999 March 1999 The following is a description of public meetings required for attendance and deliverable products: • The consultant will be required to attend up to ten (10) public workshops with the Planning Commission and /or City Council, and public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. In addition, the consultant will have numerous on- going meetings with City staff. • The consultant will provide appropriate presentation materials for all public workshops, hearings and City staff meetings. Photocopying of materials will be performed by the consultant. • The consultant will provide twenty -one (21) copies of a preliminary Screen Check Draft Circulation and related Elements and Screen Check Draft Supplemental EIR. One (1) copy of each shall be unbound. • One (1) unbound copy of Draft Circulation and Related Elements, and Draft Supplemental EIR, plus twenty -five (25) bound copies. • For each Planning Commission public hearing or workshop, consultants shall submit one (1) unbound copy of revised Draft Circulation and related Elements and Draft EIR, plus twenty -five (25) copies. • For each City Council public hearing or workshop, consultant shall submit twenty -one (21) copies of revised Circulation Element and Screen Check Final EIR for review by staff. Within one (1) week of receipt of staff comments, consultant shall submit one (1) unbound copy of the Final Circulation Element and Final EIR, and twenty -five (25) bound copies. NARFP'S\CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98) UO� � �• For each Planning Commission and /or City Council meeting/workshop, the consultant shall submit one (1) unbound copy plus twenty -five (25) bound copies of all required documents with redline /strikeout changes. Documents shall include the Draft Circulation and related Elements, Draft EIR and related support documents. Copies of all documents shall be submitted on 3 '/i' computer diskettes, including text and computerized graphics. WordPerfect, version 6.0a, software should be used for all written text. Vlll. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Your response to this RFP is requested no later than 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 22, 1998. You are advised that the City reserves the right to retain an expert to evaluate your work if you are chosen as consultant. Additionally, any contract entered into will be subject to termination at any stage if in the judgement of the City, such termination is in the best interest of the City. In the event such decision is made, appropriate written notice would be given before termination of the consultant would be paid on a pro -rata basis for work performed. L PROPOSAL CONTENT 1) Approach to the Task: Statement of tasks to be performed; number of hours allocated by each staff person for each task; along with the hourly rate of each staff member; methods of information gathering and analysis to be used; anticipated extent of City staff participation; project management and liaison with City staff project schedule. 2) Deliverable Products: A list of documents to be delivered to the City during and at completion of the project. 3) Statement of Qualifications: • Firm name, address and telephone numbers. • Project team: Lead and support personnel, including a description of responsibilities on the project. • Contemplated subcontractors, if any, must be described. A statement signed by such subcontractor should be included with the proposal certifying that he /she has participated in the proposal development and is available to undertake a subcontract as indicated in the proposal. • Description of experience with projects of similar scope and character. A copy of a recent applicable report should also be submitted. • References: You should include the name, address and telephone numbers of at NARFP'S \CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98) 6 VU1 [lip least three (3) recent clients whom we can contact regarding your work. Statement of ability to comply with the insurance and indemnification provisions set forth in the City's sample contract attached as Exhibit "A'. X. FEE PROPOSAL AND FORMS OF CONTRACT: Total cost for performing all requested services in preparing the Circulation Element update broken down by task, should be provided with the proposal, and additional information for the Supplemental EIR. Proposed fees must be based on calculations of time and materials necessary to accomplish the proposed scope of services. Estimated costs and a proven record in preparing excellent work products in a timely manner will be critical factors in evaluating proposals. Proposed budgets should include a table showing the total estimated number of hours devoted by each team member to each task. Upon selection of the top -rated consultant, the City will enter into a contract in a form substantially similar to the sample contract attached as Exhibit "A ". SELECTION CRITERIA In reviewing and evaluating proposals and qualifications, the following criteria will be considered: • Experience in preparing Circulation Elements, related EIR's, or similar studies. • Experience in public facilitation. • Proposed approach, tasks and methodology to be used in providing the required services. • Appropriate distribution of responsibilities within the project team. • Qualifications, experience and availability of key personnel and subconsultants. • Record of successful relationships with other public and corporate clients. • Ability to meet or accelerate the project schedule. • Reasonableness of proposed fee schedule in relation to proposed work plan. XII. OTHER INFORMATION Prospective consultants must submit seven (7) copies of their proposal. All proposals must be received by: Ms. Cindy Mortesen City Clerk City Hall 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 NARFP'S \CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98) 7 001, no later than 5.00 p.m on Tuesday September 22, 1998. Facsimile proposals and postmarked documents received after the submittal date will not be accepted. By submitting a response to this Request for Proposal, prospective consultant waives all rights to protest or seek any legal remedies whatsoever regarding any aspect of this Request for Proposal. The City reserves the right to select any number of qualified finalists. In addition, the City reserves the right to issue written notice to all participating firms of any changes in the proposal submission schedule, should the City determine in its sole and absolute discretion that such changes are necessary. Acceptance of any proposal submitted pursuant to this Request for Proposal shall not constitute any implied intent to enter into a contract for consulting services. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals. Final consultant selection will be made by the El Segundo City Council. The consultant selected will be under contract to the City of El Segundo. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Bellur K. Devaraj, City Engineer, or Ms. Laurie Jester, Senior Planner, at (310) 322 -4670. Sincerely, Bret B. Bernard Director of Planning and Building Safety ES:LJ:dr cc: Bellur K. Devaraj, City Engineer Laurie Jester, Senior Planner N: \RFP'S \CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98) UU3 J(l Eduard Schroder Director of Public Works MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL Held Tuesday, June 23, 1998 A meeting of the Economic Development Advisory Council was held on Tuesday, June 23, 1998 in the West Conference Room, El Segundo, California. The meeting was called to order at 11:45 a.m. by Vice Chairperson David Gaulton. ROLL CALL: Karen Ackland, Chair (Absent) David J. Gaulton (Present) Willard Krick ( Present) Richard C. Lundquist (Present) Brian Polkinghorne (Present) Nancy Cobb (Present) Carl Jacobson (Present) William T. Mason (Present) Gary Horwitz (Present) PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - None A. SPECIAL ITEMS OF BUSINESS Approval of Minutes of April 30, 1997 Meeting Ex- Officio Members: Sandra Jacobs, Mayor Pro Tem James Hansen, Dir. of Economic Development Bret Bernard, Director Planning & Building Safety Laurie Jester, Senior Planner Bellur Devaraj, City Engineer By motion duly made and seconded, the Minutes of the April 30, 1997 meeting were approved. B. GENERAL ITEMS OF BUSINESS 1. Review and Discuss Circulation Element of the General Plan Jim Hansen gave an overview of the circulation element and its function as part of the adopted General Plan. He noted that the City is preparing an RFP to retain a consultant to update the element. The City Council has requested that the EDAC assist in the development of a scope of work. Some of the subject areas could include future development potential (existing development agreements, under - developed properties, etc.), airport expansion, potential population growth, Smokey Hallow, Rosecrans corridor, Sepulveda corridor, Greenline, as well as other factors. Al31 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Approve retaining Lawrence R. Moss & Associates to design and prepare plans for the El Segundo Skateboard Park. Fiscal Impact $19,500. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1- Approve an agreement with Lawrence R. Moss & Associates to design and prepare plans for El Segundo Skateboard Park at a cost of $19,500. 2- Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the city. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: As part of the 1998 -99 budget, the city council approved a capital improvement project for the design and construction of a skateboard park at Recreation Park, using the existing parking lot area at the north east corner of Eucalyptus Drive and Grand Avenue. DISCUSSION: City staff received proposals from two companies experienced in the design and construction of skateboard parks and is recommending Lawrence Moss & Associates design the El Segundo Skateboard Park. Lawrence R. Moss & Associates $19,500 Purkiss Rose R.S.I. 19,640 Staff has interviewed Lawrence R. Moss & Associates and has made a site visit to the Santa Clarita Skate Park, their most recent project. We have also talked with Hermosa Beach officials who are using Lawrence Moss to design their city's skateboard park; they informed us they are very pleased with the service. The design process will be unusual, and will enlist the skaters of El Segundo to assist staff and architects in the design for their skateboard park. This will be accomplished by conducting hands -on workshops where skateboarders will actually try out and choose the elements to be incorporated into the park. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1- Lawrence Moss & Associates Proposal. 2- Agreement for professional services. FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget: Capital Improve. Budget: Amount Requested: 19.50 Project/Account Budget: 160,000 Project/Account Balance: 160.000 Date: August 18 1998 Account Number: Project Phase: Design Appropriation Required - Yes_ No n01r.1NeTFn• Date: August 10,1998 Jim - -dWC Drr6Mbr— �D BY: Ti by 5rimmond, Actii ACTION TAKEN: 980818.mos 8 -10 -98 10:30am +�0 LJ Date: /Z /s,r E -19 u. -UD- d j: MOSS ti July 6, 1998 Mr. Bellur Devarayj Public Works Director Public Works Department 350 Main Street, Room 11 El Segundo, California 90245 LAWAENCE R MOSS ASLA & ASSOCIATES M; 3458 OCEAN VIEW BLVD GLENDALE, CA 91206 816 249.5200 FAX 818 248-65 14 CALIF. LICENSE 01201 Rc: Skate Parks in Southern California Dear Mr. Devaraj: ,A�discussed, the followins is the status of our Skate Park Projects: • Glendora Skate Park • Hermosa Beach Skate Park • La Verne Skate Park • Lompoc Skate Park a Santa Clarity Skate Park Please call if you have any questions. Preliminary Design Phase Coast action Document Phase Preliminary Design Phase Recently awarded Contract Construction Phase - Breaking ground 7.13 -98 Very truly yours, Lahimence R. Moss, President 'LAWRENCE R. MOSS AND ASSOCIATES 1) MAUODOMOC11 u 0 1 P, LANDSCAPE ^^ P02 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1998, between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and LAWRENCE R. MOSS AND ASSOCIATES, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant ". In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform the services set forth in Exhibit "A" "SCOPE OF SERVICES" and made a part hereof. Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to properly perform said services in a thorough, competent and professional manner and shall, at all times during the term of this Agreement, have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law. Consultants shall begin its services under this Agreement on August 28, 1998. Consultant shall complete each of the services set forth in Exhibit "A" to the City's satisfaction. If the City is not satisfied with any such services, the Consultant shall work on such matter until the City approves of the service. Further, Consultant shall complete the services set forth in Exhibit "A" strictly according to the schedule provided therein. 2. STATUS OF CONSULTANT. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement RP -3 NAAGREEMNTWOSS.AGR (8/6/98) —1— a.IU��J on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. Consultant shall not disseminate any information or reports gathered or created pursuant to this Agreement without the prior written approval of City except information or reports required by government agencies to enable Consultant to perform its duties under this Agreement. 3. CONSULTANT'S KNOWLEDGE OF APPLICABLE LAWS. Consultant shall keep itself informed of applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations which may affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall observe and comply with all such laws and regulations affecting its employees. City and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section. 4. PERSONNEL. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant's staff assigned to perform the services hereunder and shall obtain the approval of the City Manager of all proposed staff members performing services under this Agreement prior to any such performance. K�-L� N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98) 1101 '3 r' 5. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. Compensation to the Consultant shall be as set forth in Exhibit "B" hereto and made a part hereof. Payments shall be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of each invoice as to all non - disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant in 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 6. ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANT. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein or listed in Exhibit 'A" unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. 7. ASSIGNMENT. All services required hereunder shall be performed by Consultant, its employees or personnel under direct contract with Consultant. Consultant shall not assign to any subcontractor the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written consent of City Manager. N:\AGREEMNTIMOSS.AGR (8/6/98) iJG13'� 8. FACILITIES AND RECORDS. City agrees to provide: suitably equipped and furnished office space, public counter, telephone, and use of copying equipment and necessary office supplies for Consultant's on -site staff, if any. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. 9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be terminated with or without cause by either party upon 30 days written notice. In the event of such termination, Consultant shall be compensated for non - disputed fees under the terms of this Agreement up to the date of termination. NAGREEMNnMOSS.AGR (8/6/98) 6 013F 10. COOPERATION BY CITY. All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the work as outlined in the Scope of Services, shall be furnished to Consultant in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the work to be performed under this Agreement. 11. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall, become the sole property of City. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION /CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. (a) All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization excepting that information which is a public record and subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, Government Code § 6250, et sea. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, 0- 1 N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98) 601 0� 19 testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. If Consultant or any of its officers, employees, consultants or subcontractors does voluntarily provide information in violation of this Agreement, City has the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages caused by Consultant's conduct, including the City's attorney's fees. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obli- gation, to represent Consultant and /or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. � P -Fs N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98) :014 (b) Consultant covenants that neither they nor any officer or principal of their firm has any interest in, or shall they acquire any interest, directly or indirectly which will conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of their services hereunder. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having such interest shall be employed by them as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. 13. DEFAULT. In the event that Consultant is in default of any provision of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. 14. INDEMNIFICATION. (a) Consultant represents it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the services and duties agreed to hereunder by Consultant, and City relies upon the skills and knowledge of Consultant. Consultant shall perform such services and duties consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals performing similar service in the State of California. (b) Consultant is an independent contractor and shall have no authority to bind City nor to create or incur any obligation on behalf of or liability against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this agreement or is otherwise N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98) X014 expressly conferred in writing by City. City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers (individually and collectively, "Indemnitees ") shall have no liability to Consultant or to any other person for, and Consultant shall indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless the Indemnitees from and against, any and all liabilities, claims, actions, causes of action, proceedings, suits, damages, judgments, liens, levies, costs and expenses of whatever nature, including reasonable attorneys' fees and disbursements (collectively "Claims "), which the Indemnitees may suffer or incur or to which the Indemnitees may become subject by reason of or arising out of any injury to or death of any person(s), damage to property, loss of use of property, economic loss or otherwise occurring as a result of or allegedly caused by the performance or failure to perform by Consultant of Consultant's services under this agreement or the negligent or willful acts or omissions of Consultant, its agents, officers, directors or employees, in performing any of the services under this agreement. If any action or proceeding is brought against the Indemnitees by reason of any of the matters against which Consultant has agreed to indemnify the Indemnitees as above provided, Consultant, upon notice from the CITY, shall defend the Indemnitees at Consultant's expense by counsel acceptable to the City. The Indemnitees need not have first paid any of the matters as to which the Indemnitees are entitled to indemnity in order to be so indemnified. The insurance required to be maintained by Consultant under paragraph 15 shall ensure Consultant's obligations under this paragraph 14(b), but the limits of such insurance shall not limit the liability of Consultant hereunder. The provisions of this paragraph 14(b) shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this agreement. N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98) A0 J V The Consultant's indemnification does not extend to Claims occurring as a result of the City's negligent or willful acts or omissions. 15. INSURANCE. A. Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall provide and maintain insurance acceptable to the City Attorney in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII. Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance: as: (1) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad (a) Insurance Services Office form Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001). (b) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, including code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025, or equivalent forms subject to the written approval of the City. V-0 NAAGREEMNTWOSS.AGR (8/6/98) 6 014., (c) Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of State of California and Employer's Liability insurance and covering all persons providing services on behalf of the Consultant and all risks to such persons under this Agreement. (d) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession. (2) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits of insurance no less than: (a) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the activities related to this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (b) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. �P -ia N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98) J014' (c) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. (d) Errors and Omissions Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence. B Other Provisions. Insurance policies required by this Agreement shall contain the following provisions: (1) All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this paragraph 15 shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by the insurer or either parry to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior written notice by Certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. (2) General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages. (a) City, its officers, officials, and employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Consultant performs, products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant, or automobiles owned, leased or hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, or employees. ��-13 N:\AGREEMNTIMOSS.AGR (8/6/98) -11- 6 O14v (b) Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect to City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Consultant's insurance. (c) Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (d) Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Coverage. Unless the City Manager otherwise agrees in writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, officials, employees and agents for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. C. Other Reauirements. Consultant agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this contract, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City Attorney may require that Consultant furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this 0 -14 N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98) j0141 Section. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. (1) Consultant shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Consultant provides. (2) Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self- insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims. (3) The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Consultant's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement. 16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement is the complete, final, entire and exclusive expression of the Agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations by any party which are not embodied herein and that no other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. N:WGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98) OC14 17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. 18. ASSIGNMENT OR SUBSTITUTION. City has an interest in the qualifications of and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Consultant by this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, neither any complete nor partial assignment of this Agreement may be made by Consultant nor changed, substituted for, deleted, or added to without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment or substitution shall be ineffective, null, and void, and constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including summary termination of this Agreement. 19. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. The terms of this Agreement can only be modified in writing approved by the City Council and the Consultant. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and any attempted waiver shall be void. N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98) 00.148 20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he /she /they has /have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of his /her /their corporation and warrants and represents that he /she /they has /have the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 21. NOTICES. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: Cam. Attention: Mr. Jim Fauk Recreation and Parks Department City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, California 90245 Telephone (310) 322 -4670, extension 298 Facsimile (310) 322 -3693 Consultant. Attention: Mr. Lawrence Moss 3458 Ocean View Boulevard Glendale, CA 91208 Telephone: (818) 248 -5200 Facsimile: (818) 248 -6574 N: AGREEMNTWOSS.AGR (8/6/98) -15- 0014J The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. 20. SEVERABILITY. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of the other provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHERE OF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Z Title CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Title ATTEST: Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk NAAGREEMNTWOSS.AGR (8/6/98) APPROVERAS TO FORM: Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES Phase I — Preliminary Study A. Establish communication with key City of El Segundo staff and review, clarify and define project schedule, proposed budgets and project elements. B. With City staff, plan, design and schedule public meeting in the community to introduce the project and seek public input on skate park. C. Obtain available documentation and project information from the City and review. D. Evaluate site and assess existing site conditions. E. Recommend proposed methods of conducting work. F. Create base sheets for project. Phase II — Preliminary Design A. Develop conceptual plan alternatives based on site investigation, research and public input. B. Prepare preliminary cost estimates for each conceptual plan alternative. C. Review conceptual plan alternatives with City staff for input and approval. D. Revise conceptual plan alternatives per City staff input. E. Present conceptual plan alternatives in 2nd community meeting for input and approval. Phase III — Design Development A. Receive direction to proceed with preferred alternative from City staff. B. Prepare a preliminary plan based on the preferred alternative that reflects the consensus of staff and community. Site furnishings, materials, etc., will be selected at this time. C. Review final plan with city staff. D. Prepare colored rendering of approved final design for presentation in 3'd community meeting. E. Prepare updated construction cost estimate for preferred design alternative. F. Attend up to two City Council meetings Phase IV — Construction Documents A. Incorporate all modifications generated by the City of El Segundo and all agencies. B. Prepare based on approved preliminary plan, final working drawings, specifications and details required to meet City ordinances and standards. Drawings shall include: Grading and Drainage Plan, Construction Plan, Electrical and Civil Engineering, Planting Plan, Irrigation Plan, Lighting Plan, and Details C. Prepare estimate of construction costs and review with City staff. D. Make final corrections based on city review. NAAGREEMNTWOSS.AGR (8/6198) 0051 Phase V — Construction Administration A. Assist City with bidding process 1. Conduct pre -bid meeting 2. Provide clarification of drawings and answer questions from contractors during the bidding process. 3. Prepare necessary addenda to bid package. B. Construction administration and field observation 1. Conduct pre- construction meeting. 2. Provide eight (8) site observation visits, as required. 3. Conduct weekly progress meetings. 4. Review shop drawings, samples and submissions 5. Provide construction support by telephone as needed throughout construction. N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98) 605 ' EXHIBIT "B" COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT FEE: $19,500.00 FEE SCHEDULE: Due upon completion of Phase 1 $2,000.00 Due upon completion of Phase 11, and approvals $3,000.00 Due upon completion of Phase III, and approvals $4,000.00 Due upon completion of Phase IV, and approvals $7,500.00 Due upon completion of Phase V, and approvals $3,000.00 The following shall not be considered part of the above fee and will be charged for as-noted: 1. Revision(s) to any previously approved drawings shall be charged for at the rate of $95.00 per hour. 2. Expenses including, but not limited to, printing, plotting, deliveries, etc. will be charged for at Consultant's cost. 3. Site visits over and above those previously mentioned will be billed for at $105.00 per hour, if required. N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98) _19- nu J ' li v j_ ;_, EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Resolution approving the application for funds in the amount of $33,535 from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District per Parcel Discretionary Grant Program for El Segundo Skateboard Park. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Resolution INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The city's Capital Improvement Budget calls for the design and construction of a Skateboard Park to be located at the corner of Eucalyptus Drive and Grand Avenue. The project budget is $160,000 and calls for applying for grant funding of $36,000, leaving a general fund obligation of $124,000. Since submitting the capital improvement request, we have been informed that less money is available, which reduces our grant request to $33,535. DISCUSSION: The funding source for the grant is the Los Angeles County Safe Neighborhood Parks Proposition which entitles the City of El Segundo to per parcel discretionary funding. El Segundo has used similar funding in the past for such projects as Richmond Field lighting and Holly Valley Park. One change in funding requirements calls for each funded project to employ at risk youth, from the community to work on the project. Each governing body submitting a project must approve a youth employment plan, which has created problems and concerns from many municipalities. We will work to develop a plan and come back to council for approval once we feel an acceptable plan is developed. The requirement is that 10% of the grant amount must be used for the employment of at risk youth. It is our plan to include this as part of the bid specification. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution - Approving application for grant funds from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District Grant Program FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget: Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number: Project Phase: ADoropriation Required - Yes_ No_ ORIGi WED; i Date: August 7, 1 Jim Fo k, >Trector RE EWED BY: Date: el4xfe T y rimmond, Acting ity Manager ACTION TAKEN: P 980818.skb 8 -07 -98 12:00am ;� o E -20 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT GRANT PROGRAM FOR EL SEGUNDO SKATEBOARD PARK WHEREAS, the people of the County of Los Angeles on November 3, 1992 and on November 5, 1996, enacted Los Angeles County Proposition A, Safe Neighborhood Parks, Gang Prevention, Tree - Planting, Senior and Youth Recreation, Beaches and Wildlife Protection, which, among other uses, provides funds to public agencies and nonprofit organizations in the County for the purposes of acquiring and /or developing facilities and open space for public recreation; and WHEREAS, the Proposition also created the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District to administer said funds; and WHEREAS, the District has set forth the necessary procedures governing applications for grant funds under the Proposition; and WHEREAS, the District's procedures require the Applicant to certify, by resolution, approval of the application before submission of said application to the District; and WHEREAS, the application form contains assurances that the Applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, the Applicant certifies through this resolution; that the application is approved for submission to the District; and WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Project Agreement with the District for performance of the project as described in the application; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY: 1. Approves the filing of an application with Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District for funds allocated under Section 3 (C) (1) of the Proposition for the above -named Project; and 2. Certifies that said Applicant understands the assurances and certifications in the application form; and 3. Certifies that said Applicant understands its obligation to operate and maintain the property in perpetuity; and 4. Certifies that said Applicant will sign and return, within 30 days, both copies of the project agreement sent by the District for authorizing signature; and 5. Authorizes the Director of Recreation and Parks, or designee, as agent of City of El Segundo to conduct all negotiations, and to execute and submit all- documents including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so forth, which may be necessary for the completion of the project as described in the application. RESOLUTION NO, APPROVING GRANT APPLICATION FOR SKATEBOARD PARK PAGE i P- gkb -A 0015. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1998. MIKE GORDON, MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18th day of August, 1998, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CINDY MORTESEN, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: MARK D. HENSLEY, CITY ATT NEY RESOLUTION NO. S lL b _ APPROVING GRANT APPLICATION FOR SKATEBOARD PARK PAGE 2 t t' J � li 0 1 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Resolution approving the application for funds in the amount of $41,000 from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District per Parcel Discretionary Grant Program for El Segundo Roller Hockey Rink. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Resolution INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The city's Capital Improvement Budget calls for the completion of the Roller Hockey Rink at Recreation Park which will include such features as dasher boards, fencing, viewing areas, team benches, lighting and bleachers. The project budget is $104,000 and calls for applying for grant funding of $41,000, leaving a general fund obligation of $63 ,000. DISCUSSION: The funding source for the grant is the Los Angeles County Safe Neighborhood Parks Proposition which entities the City of El Segundo to per parcel discretionary funding. El Segundo has used similar funding in the past for such projects as Richmond Field lighting and Holly Valley Park. One change in funding requirements calls for each funded project to employ at risk youth, from the community to work on the project. Each governing body submitting a project must approve a youth employment plan, which has created problems and concerns from many municipalities. We will work to develop a plan and come back to council for approval once we feel an acceptable plan is developed. The requirement is that 10% of the grant amount must be used for the employment of at risk youth. It is our plan to include this as part of the bid specification. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution - Approving application for grant funds from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District Grant Program FISCAL IMPACT: (Check one) Operating Budget: Capital Improv. Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Date: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required - Yes_ No_ %RI T : Date: August 7, 1998 irec or REVIEWED BY: T by Grimmond, Acting ity Man ACTION TAKEN: 980818.cty 8 -07 -98 10:30am 10 15"' Date: gyp - RH- I E -21 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT GRANT PROGRAM FOR EL SEGUNDO ROLLER HOCKEY RINK WHEREAS, the people of the County of Los Angeles, on November 3, 1992 and on November 5, 1996, enacted Los Angeles County Proposition A, Safe Neighborhood Parks, Gang Prevention, Tree - Planting, Senior and Youth Recreation, Beaches and Wildlife Protection, which, among other uses, provides funds to public agencies and nonprofit organizations in the County for the purposes of acquiring and /or developing facilities and open space for public recreation; and WHEREAS, the Proposition also created the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District to administer said funds; and WHEREAS, the District has set forth the necessary procedures governing applications for grant funds under the Proposition; and WHEREAS, the District's procedures require the Applicant to certify, by resolution, approval of the application before submission of said application to the District; and WHEREAS, the application form contains assurances that the Applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, the Applicant certifies through this resolution that the application is approved for submission to the District; and WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Project Agreement with the District for performance of the project as described in the application; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Approves the filing of an application with Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District for funds allocated under Section 3 (C) (1) of the Proposition for the above -named Project; and 2. Certifies that said Applicant understands the assurances and certifications in the application form; and 3. Certifies that said Applicant understands its obligation to operate and maintain the property in perpetuity; and 4. Certifies that said Applicant will sign and return, within thirty (30) days, both copies of the project agreement sent by the District for authorizing signature; and `5. Authorizes the Director of Recreation and Parks , or designee, as agent of City of El Segundo to conduct all negotiations, and to execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so forth, which may be necessary for the completion of the project as described in the application. oU1DI RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING GRANT APPLICATION FOR ROLLER HOCKET RINK PAGE a PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1998. MIKE GORDON, MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18th day of August, 1998, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT; ABSTAIN: CINDY MORTESEN, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: MARK b. HENSLEY, CITY A' li u 1 5 9 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING GRANT APPLICATION FOR ROLLER HOCKET RINK 3 PAGE 2 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 18 August 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Extension of City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Contracts RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve no -cost extension of City's RSI Contracts through end of calendar year 1998. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Coordination with the 62 homeowners participating in Phase 5 of the City's RSI Program, to minimize inconvenience and maximize service, took longer than anticipated. As a result, and as indicated previously, the start of construction was delayed. Initially it was planned that the construction for Phase 5 would be completed by August 1998. Completion is now planned for October 1998. In order to continue the work of Wyle Laboratories, Golden Bear Construction, T & M Construction, and Peerless Products, Inc., it is necessary to extend the life of their contracts. As a precaution against further delays, it is requested that the Phase 5 RSI contracts be extended to the end of calendar year 1998. It is also requested the Wyle contract be extended two full calendar years. DISCUSSION: The City has approached the RSI program as a series of custom home modification projects rather than a federal, "cinder block project ". As part of the City's approach, all project staff, including the City's staff, the consultant, and the contractor have taken great pains to meet frequently with all 62 participating homeowners. The purpose of these meetings is to ensure that the homeowner knows what is planned, that the homeowner's input is fully evaluated and incorporated into the plan wherever possible, that options are presented where possible, and that surprises are minimized, if not eliminated. Among the dozen or so homeowners whose Phase 5 homes have been completed thus far, the consensus has been that the homes are much quieter as a result of the RSI treatment. The ventilation systems have received kudos and the workmanship of the contractors has been praised. When there have been questions, participating homeowners have had no difficulty contacting their contractor and /or the City and getting timely answers. This personalized treatment has had a large time price tag, however we believe it has produced happier participants and minimized problems. Should the Council determine it appropriate to extend the RSI provider contracts, an Addendum Agreement to the current contracts will be entered into between the City and each of the four companies. (Please see attached documents). There is no increase in cost associated with this extension request. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Contract Extension Agreements for: Wyle Laboratories, Golden Bear Construction, T & M Construction, and Peerless Products, Inc. FISCAL IMPACT: None ORIGINATED'a REVIEWED BY: Date: 29 July 1998 Date: 29 July 1998 REVIEWED BY: Date: � /Z /fe 'AKEN: o 1 E -22 C: \harvey \rsi98 \contract.798 AMENDMENT 3 TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PW97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998 The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the " Cit% °) and Peerless Products. Inc. (hereinafter "Peerless'. collectivel} the "Parties "), herebiv amend the Cit}-'s Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract**). Contract No. 2559. of 4 November 1997. (the "Contract") as follows: Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 01015. Volume 2. Standard Project .Specifications and Details. is amended as follows: Remove: Constriction shall substantiallN be complete NNithin 180 calendar days of the date of the Notice -to- Proceed. Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 December 1998. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO By Date: Harvey Holden. Airport Projects Admin. APPROVED AS TO FORM: 'lark sic\. Cite Attorn ATTEST: Cindy Mortensen. Cite Clerk li 01 C:A h arvcv \rsicontr.98 \anuid2559.003 PEERLESS PRODUCTS. INC. By: Date: John Johnston. VP Sales /Marketing AMENDMENT 3 TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PW97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998 The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the " Citv") and G.B. Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "Golden Bcar' . collectively the "Parties "). hereby amend the City's Residential Sound lnsulation (RSI) Program Contract —). Contract No. 2%0. of 4 November 1997. (the "Contract-') as follm\s: Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 01015. Volume 2. Standard Project Specifications and Details. is amended as follows: Remove: Constniction shall substantially be complete N\ ithin 180 calendar days of the date of the Notice -to- Proceed. Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 December 1 998. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO By Harvey Holdcn. Airport Projects Admin. Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: tits Cite Attorney ATTEST: Cindv Mortensen. Cite Clerk t; 01 C:\Iiar veN, \rsicontr.98 \anuid2560.003 G.B. CONSTRUCTION. INC. LN Date: Chin Lee. President AMENDMENT 3 TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PNi'97 -SA OF 18 AUGUST 1998 The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the -Cite') and G.B. Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "Golden Bear'. collectively the "Parties"). hereby amend the City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract'). Contract No. 2561. of 4 November 1997. (the "Contract ") as follo\\s: Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 0 10 15. Volume 2. Standard Project ,Specifications and Details. is amended as follows: Remove: Construction shall substant iii ll\ be complete \ \ithin 190 calendar days of the date of the Notice -to- Proceed. Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 Dccertlber 1995. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO By: Harvey Holden. Airport Projects Admin. Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: a Hens e\'. Cit\ Attornc\ ATTEST: Cind\ Mortensen. City Clerk o1 C:\ han •c\, \rsi coil tr. 95 \a ill nd2561.00 3 G.B. CONSTRUCTION. INC. Date: Chin Lee. President AMENDMENT 3 TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PW97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998 The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the "City-)and G.B. Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "Golden Bear ". collectively the "Parties"). herebv amend the Citv's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract "). Contact No. 2562, of 4 November 1997. (the "Contract") as follom: Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 01015. Volume 2. ,S'randa, d pr ject •tipeci/ications and Derails. is amended as follows: Remove: Construction shall substantially be complete N\ ithin 18o calendar days of the date of the Notice -to- Proceed. Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall e.xpire on 31 December 1998. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO L-12 Date: Han e) Holden. Airport Projects Admin. APPROVED AS TO FORM: /j Cite Atto ATTEST: Cindy Mortensen. Cite Clerk U0.1 . C:A th an,cN- \rsicontr.98 \amed2562.00 G.B. CONSTRUCTION. INC. Date: Chin Lee. President AMENDMENT 3 TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PW97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998 The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the "Cite-) and G.B. Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "Golden Bear'. collectiveh the "Parties"), hereby amend the City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract). Contract No. 2563. of 4 November 1997. (the °Contract') as follows: Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 01015. Volume 2. Stondord Project Specification.% and Uetods. is amended as tbllo\cs: Remove: Construction shall substantially be complete within 180 calendar days of the dine of the Notice -to- Proceed. Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 December 1998. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO By: Date: Han-c) Holden. Airport Projects Admin. APPROVED AS TO FORM: m slcc. Cite Altorne\ ATTEST: Cindy Mortensen. Cite Clerk R r c- C:Ahan °eN• \rsicontr.98 \anutd2 563.003 G.B. CONSTRUCTION. INC. 0 Date: Chin Lee. President AMENDMENT 3 TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PW97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998 The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the °Cite ") and T K M Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "T & M ". collectively the "Parties'), hereby amend the City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract"). Contract No. 2564. of 4 November 1997. (the -Contract") as follows: Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section O 1015. VOIUme 2..S'tandard Project .Specifications and Derails. is amended as follows: Remove: Construction shall substantialIN be complete within 150 calendar dads of the date of the Notice -to- Proceed. Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 December 1995. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO By Han•e� Holden. Airport Projects Admin. Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: k Henslct-.'City AtlorneN ATTEST: Cindy Mortensen. Cite Clerk C:Ahan,cv \rsicontr.95 \anutd2 564.003 T K M CONSTRUCTION. INC. I� Date: Tern Tsetseris. ON\ ner AMENDMENT 3 TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PNV97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998 Tile City of El Segundo (hereinafter the " CitN") and G.B. Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "Golden Bear collectively the "Parties"). hereby amend the City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract). Contract No. 2 >6-5. of 4 November 1997. (the "Contract') as folloN%s: Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 0 101 5. Volume 2. Standard Project Specifications and Details. is amended as folloNNs: Remove: Construction shall substantially be complete NN ithin 180 calendar daN s of the date of the Notice -to- Proceed. Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 December 1998. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Bv: Harvey Holden. Airport Projects Admin. Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: �Giyrl: ns _ .Cite ttornc\ ATTEST: Cindy Mortensen. Cite Clerk C.1 G7 C:A har n•ev \rsicontr.98 \amnd2565.003 G.B. CONSTRUCTION. INC. LIZA Date: Chin Lee. President AMENDMENT 3 TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PW97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998 The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the " City-) and G.B. Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "Golden Bear ". collectively the "Parties "). hereby amend the City*s Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract"). Contract No. 2566. of 4 November 1997. (the "Contract ") as follows: Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 01015. Volume 2. ,Stn»dnrd Project .Specification and Details. is amended as follows: Remove: Construction shall substantially be colllplete \N ithln 180 calendar days of the date of the Notice -to- Proceed. Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 December 1998. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Bv: Harney Holden. Airport Projects Adnlill. Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: i ark ens it4c. i ATTEST: Cindn Mortensen. Cite Clerk �,0' fiP It C: \harnev \rsicontr.98 \anllld2 566.003 G.B. CONSTRUCTION. INC. 0 Dale: Chin Lee. President AMENDMENT 3 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES El Se«undo Public Works Project No. PW93 -21 OF 18 AUGUST 1998 The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the `CitN-) and Wyle Laboratories (hereinafter "W} le collectively the "Parties "). hereby amend the Agreement to provide consultant sen-ices for the Ciq *s Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program". Contract No. 2300, of 5 October 1993. (the -Agreement") as folloNv s: Amendment No. 2 of 10 June 1996: Section 8 of Amendment No. 2 extended the term of the original agreement for two years from the effect i\ e date of the Amendment. Amendment No. 3: Amendment No. 3 estendes the term of the original agreement for an additional two years from the effective date of Amendment No. 3. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO WYLE LABORATORIES By: B\: Harvey Holden. Airport Projects Admin. Llo. d l{osenki. Contracts Manager Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: i Hens e\. Cite Attornc\ ATTEST: Cind\ Mortensen. Cite Clerk C : \laarn-cN, \rsicontr.98 \anlnd\N \ lc -003 Date. EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Authorization to solicit bids for an annual contract for sidewalk, curb and other minor repairs - Project No. PW 98 -3 (budgeted amount $50,000.00). RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of bids. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The 1998 -99 Capital Improvement Program includes $50,000.00 in Gas Tax funds for a project to repair sidewalks and curbs at various locations. Historically, the City has a sidewalk repair program which was implemented once a year. This program included sidewalks at various locations throughout the City where repairs were warranted. DISCUSSION: The current program was implemented only once every year. This resulted in repair of some sidewalks delayed by as much as one (1) year. Staff is proposing the annual contract to provide better service to the community by expeditiously repairing sidewalks. This contract will establish unit bid prices for sidewalks, curbs and other minor improvements. On an as needed basis, the contractor will be given repair locations (approximately once every two (2) months). The contractor will be guaranteed a minimum order of $7,500.00 based on contract unit prices. With this contract, the anticipated time for an identified sidewalk to be repaired is two (2) months rather than the one (1) year for the current program. Staff recommends City Council authorization to advertise the project for receipt of bids. ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: Capital Improvement Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: No Yes $50,000.00 $50,000Q0 $50.000.00 Date: By Finance Department Adoption of plans and specifications No r 17 o iJ-1 f ' WCOUNCILTW- AUG18.04 (Monday 8/10/98 10:00 AM) E -23 EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Award of contract for sidewalk replacement, handicap ramps and new sidewalks on Grand Avenue - Project No. PW 97 -26 (contract amount = $73,310.00). RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Award contract to the lowest responsible bidder, HiTech Pro Construction Company, in the amount of $73,310.00. Authorize the Mayor to execute the standard public works construction agreement after approval as to form by the City Attorney. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: On July 7, 1998, the City Council adopted plans and specifications and authorized staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids. The project includes repair of sidewalks and handicapped access ramps at various locations and installation of new sidewalk on the northside of Grand Avenue between Illinois Street and Sepulveda Boulevard. DISCUSSION: On July 28, 1998, the City Clerk received and opened the following bids: ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Location map. FISCAL IMPACT: Operating Budget: Capital Improvement Budget: Amount Requested: Project/Account Budget: Project/Account Balance: Account Number: Project Phase: Appropriation Required: (continued on the next page.......) No Yes $73.310.00 $110,000.00 $105.000.00 Date: 6/25/98 106 -400- 8203 -8604 8562 and 114 -400- 8203 -8972 Award of contract No Page 1 of 2 . 17t NACOUNCILTW-AUG18.05 (Monday 8/10/981:00 E -24 DISCUSSION: (continued) HiTech Pro Construction Company CJ Construction, Inc. Damon Construction Excel Paving Company Nobest Inc. Pave West Engineer's Estimate $ 73,310.00 $ 76,543.60 $ 87,456.00 $124,663.00 $143,112.20 $195,048.00 $ 80,117.00 Starting June 10, 1998, the City advertised the sidewalk repair program on the community cable television system. Subsequent to the preparation of plans and specifications for this project, staff has received citizen requests for sidewalk repair at twenty -one (21) locations. This additional work will be accomplished through the proposed HiTech Pro contract utilizing its low bid contract unit prices. Staff has received favorable responses from references provided by the apparent low bidder. Staff recommends award of contract to HiTech Construction Company in the amount of $73,310.00. Page 2 of 2 1 � n NACOUNCIUPW- AUG18.05 (Monday 8/10/98 1:00 PM) HILLCREST ST Ion LOMA VIST WHITING VIRGINIA ECONCORD m RICHMOND MAIN 9 STANDARD = S T. ST. ST. b 3 S T. ... S T EUCALYPTUS a 14 ARENA 0 SHELDON PENN 0 SIERRA Vw b LOMITA A in MARYLAND p BUNGALOW 4 CENTER NEVADA ST. S T. z DR. S1. ST. ST ST S T. S T. DR. S T. ST. OREGON ST. CALIFORNIA a ST. KANSAS MIST. WASHINGTON O ST. ILLINOIS ST INDIANA ST. W w o0l73 S West City Boundory-- I REDWOOD _. �...� AVE. YUCCA ST. N c� 9 ; ZO � HILL RES T 0 = N �' ' r > 19 0 < D le r 30 = A C a S ( VALLEY c z I LOMA IST S � BAYONNE T��B S ® E3 R CON RD ElEil �DBB PL. CEO ST. B8 m 880 0 i o F\ � PEPPER ST _ a D a I��88E0 �® s CYP SI e® oC0D300 McCARTH CT. LOMITA ari ®� BUNGA CALIFORNIA ST. co rn a as DO m HI TON WA ST. o � ILLINOIS IN UWA C < _ CT. N ' N r s`x N � � S T. I O y i m a r m O c CL 0 i m 08/17/98 16:48 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 Federal Aviation Administration Western - Pacific Region Hawthorne, California Date: 1//1/91 To: -M 1'k 6MkyV--' From: No. of pages including cover: Phone: (310) 725 -3550 COMMENTS: zv� i OPTIONAL FORM 97 (7-90) NC.831 P001/24E Fax: (310) 536 -8400 � 6Pfe& of u.. Regional Administrator 2E /17/98 16:44 U.S. Deportment of Tror%padatlon Federoi Aviation Administratlon AwP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 JUN 0 5 1998 Dear Citizen: ornCe or the Regional - Administrator Western - Pacinc Reglon [� NO.931 P202/245 P. O. Box 92007 Worldway Postal Center Los Angeles, CA 90009 Thank you for attending the community meeting held at El Segundo High School on Tuesday, April 28, 1998. Enclosed is the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) response to the issue you noted that evening on the speaker request form. We appreciate your attendance at the meeting and your interest in aviation safety. sincerely, William C. Withycombe Regional Administrator Enclosure CC,. Congresswoman Jane Harman Mo W \ x \ et/!'t/9B 16:48 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.631 P003i0, El Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form't�,f Please print Clearly NAW e —tlr b r v c� j S /' o` ORGANIZATION (Optional) ADDRESS h1 5 CI'T'Y, ZIP er W1 0 5rN �G % 902's %1 PHONE 3 3 (— TOPIC N 0 1 S P n d-e r So dLl 2 6cAk �-/ 06/17/98 16 :48 AWP -6 Noise Over South Bay Jane Garvey, The Federal Aviation Administration 0-'AA) Administrator, established The Southern California Task Force (SCTF) to address aircraft noise concerns within the Los Angeles Basin. Ms. Garvey initiated this action after attending a local town hall meeting on December 12, 1997. The meeting was in regards to current operations at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and future plans. The SCTF will analyze the current air traffic procedures within the Southern California area relative to aviation safety, efficiency, and quality-of -life concerns. 'Die goal of the task force is to balance the needs of the Southern California commUdties with that of the airspace users and the FAA, while ensuring the integrity of the National Airspace System. The SCTF is meeting with FAA facility managers, airport sponsors, community representatives, elected officials, aviation users groups, and the general public to identify concerns, community impacts, and proposed solutions. The task force has held town hall meetings at Monterey Park, Torrance and El Segundo. The SCTF is identifying and evaluating the safety and efficiency of current air traffic procedures and their noise impacts on affected communities. These concerns are being prioritized into short term, intermediate, and long -term action items. A plan leading to completion of the action items is also being developed. You may with to visit our Internet site at www.aW.faa.gov and click on "Southern California Task Force" for more information on the group's activity. The city of Los Angeles is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EISIEIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze numerous environmental issues, including noise. The EIR/EIS process is a public process. 06/17/98 16:48 AWP -6 OP6 CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.831 P025/045 � J El Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form ,please print cearly NAME r.I b'� / 04 e S ORGANIZATION (Optional) ADDRESS �� °r 1.�� e.• e�.� �V�. CITY, ZIP .0 v° y PHONE 3/o G f TOPIC Pd tL-r 08/17/98 16:49 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 % Airport The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIRIEIS process is a public process. The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed munber and can vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures we delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the ;gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety and. environmental perspective before they can be implemented. 08/17/98 16:48 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 n Jegunuo I..UIi munLLY IVIUU1.11 , Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NAME l%,�P ORGANIZATION (Optional) NC.831 P027/045 ADDRESS I•�'!�X 5 ra'C. i� "r CITY, ZIP 0*17,1N gC *l+-- PHONE 31 Z� �{�f 73 TOPIC l S Bd/17/9B 16:45 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 Noise Jane Garvey, The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator, established The Southern California Task Force (SCTF) to address aircraft noise concerns within the Los Angeles Basin. Ms. Garvey initiated this action after attending a local town hall meeting on December 12, 1997. The meeting was in regards to current operations at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and future plans. The SCTF will analyze the current air traffic procedures within the Southern California area, relative to aviation safety, efficiency, and quality-of -life concerns. The goal of the task force is to balance the needs of the Southern California communities with that of the airspace users and the FAA, while ensuring the integrity of the National Airspace System. The SCTF is meeting with FAA facility managers, airport sponsors, community representatives, elected officials, aviation users groups, and the general public to identify concerns, community impacts, and proposed solutions. The task force has held town hall meetings at Monterey Park, Torrance and El Segundo. The SCTF is identifying and evaluating the safety and efficiency of current air traffic procedures and their noise impacts on affected communities. These concerns are being prioritized into short term, intermediate, and long -term action items. A plan leading to completion of the action items is also being developed. You may with to visit our Internet site at www.awp.faa_goy and click on "Southern California Task Force" for more information on the group's activity, The city of Los Angeles is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Ertvironmental Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze numerous environmental issues, including noise. The EIR/EIS process is a public process. P20G /245 06/17/98 16:49 A'WP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NO.831 pa 09/045 660 E1 Segundo Communitf Meeting Speaker Request Form please print Clearly NAIL 1 E � 5�J ORGANIZATION (Optional) 6.5 R A' ADDRESS ly aS" C G /Vj i T"i� srr PxoNEO CITY, - TOPIC 4 7/17/99 16:49 PWP -6 Airport The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a public process. The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to emure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is,a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air ixaffic control procedures act to turn, down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the late. Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport, Current aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before they can be implemented. 09/17/98 16:49 PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 El Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NAME ORGA11IZATj3?(N (Optiona ADDRESS_ -75/ CITY, TOPIC NO.931 P011i045- PHONE 31—a (� �(� 28i17i5d 16:45 Pollution/Congestiion The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint EnvironmentO Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EISOR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a public process. The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA, controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn down the volume, Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the groi.ind at the other airport. Current aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes. are required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before they can be implemented. F212/245- 06/17/96 16:49 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 310 322 7137 El Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request ]Form Please print Clearly NAME NO.e31 P013/045 J ` ORGANIZATION -5 (Optional) / ' a ADDRESS 2 4- 4A9 -k1"AJ 5-S ! ;T CITY, ZIP X4A -)V14 - /A1J .A7W PHONE -316 TOPIC 4Ai< 08/!7/98 16:50 PwP -6 OP5 CENTER LAX Expansion The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Flan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmentfil Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a public process. The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures aa °e delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the ;gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before they can be implemented. P014/045- �6i1 i76 16:54 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 zl 6egunao Lommunity Meeting Speaker Request ]Form Please print Clearly / 1 � ORGANMATION (Optional) ADDRESS CITY, ZIP PHONElD TOPIC NO.631 Pa15id4� 06/17/96 16:50 AwP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 . .t • " LAX The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts, The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmentf►1 Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues, The EIRIEIS process is a public process. The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the .gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before they can be implemented. P216/24E 09/17/98 16:50 PwP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 El Segundo community Meeting Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NC.831 P217/24E (GCiG NAME ORGANIZATION (Optional) n ADDRESS CITY ZIP L �Q.S c hob r- 900"')HONE 3�0 6 d O q y TOPIC_ u Q n - 05/17/95 16:50 AWP -6 ORS LAX Expansion The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The Cite is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Repo tt/Envirornmental Impact Statement (EISIEIR). The LISUR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a public process. The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the ,gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current aircraft airival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety and environtziental perspective before they can be implemented. Pa18%045 08/17/98 16:51 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 El Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NAME ORGANIZATION (Optional) ADDRESS CITY, ZIP yy, .-- �\ l c�.-- �.• PHONE TOPIC LA 1� t'ro �oSe .LjC�Cu� Qc v�-` o- N0.e31 P019i045 k'l/ V aS%i7 /38 16:51 PWF -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 LAX Proposed Expansion The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA axe preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a public process. T]ae primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impost: restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in tirae the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn down, the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety anti environmental perspective before they can be implemented. P020ia45 e8/17/58 16:51 ASP -6`Oi ovgu uu 310 322 Meeting '► Speaker Request )Form Please print Clearly NAME r Ll tj � ORGANIZATION (Optional) ADDRESS 1 t—T� U) AK N0.631 P221/24 9& CITY, ZIP 1�-I 5� r�f� (00 e6 PHONE tJ TOPIC 1 T � _ -U ,4�A �4 -FLA k �J 1 AJ 61 j 29 /17 /9e 16:51 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 Density and Urban Planning The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration, The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/IrIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a public process. The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright, Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate, Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before they can be implemented. P222/245 08/17/98 16:51 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 • w ni '3rgulIUU 4,Ull till UllAL.f lvlVVlll1S Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NAME ORGANIZATION (Optional) ADDR CITY, TOPIC N0.831 P/023/04� (Z 09/17/99 16:52 AWP -6 OPS CENTER Environment /Air Quality The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration, The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EISMIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environ rental issues. The EIRMS process is a public process. The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport;at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors, If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to tum down the volume, Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held out the ground at the other airport. Current aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before they can be implemented. P024/045 09/17/98 16:52 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 zi 0vr7U11UU VU111j11L41L1LJ Lvi"f,1116 • Speaker Request Form please print Clearly NO.631 P225/245 Y - NANM G [k cC U414 n,S OW ORGANIZATION (Optional) C L s cG ka bQ F C -s f A Erg I S A S ADDRESS 114 L C—'- SYCAth 6Aer �1v CITY$ ZIP- S F [r N CA. PHONE —A TOPIC w446 WINS I F LA-tw_ AAy2 6 pAOSW - V((;ws mr- LAk �,�pgNSfONZ 08/17/98 16:52 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 LAX Expansion The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards, The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EISIEIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a public process. The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and c;m vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures Are delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport, Current aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before they can be implemented. P026/045 26 /!7i9e 16:52 AWF -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 E1 Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form 'lease print Clearly NAME A4r�l ORGANIZATION (Optional) N0.931 F227i245 ADDRESS_ I(� CITY, ZIP �'1 C a 7 a tiTJ PHO�iE�� Q ;7 TOPIC O/ S V U/rG1..TZ ��"J�`� �i% t�E,CrP. OW e%% 2e/17/9e 16:52 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 Noise Vibrations Measurement, Health Concerns The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed recon:5guration. The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master flan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EISMIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a public process. The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace, The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX From a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport'at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures eve delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Cturent aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before they can be implemented. F229/245 29 /17i9e 16:52 AWR -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 Please print Clearly NAME I// a E1 Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form ORGANIZATION (Optional) NC.e31 P329/045 rry ADDRESS / - - CITY, ZIP a c7c /C PHONE 2' 75,` , d TOPIC_ 1.9 � / A40' �/P X 9'A �°� �`�' „��' 06/17/98 16:53 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 Speaker Request Form Pleaseprint Clearly NAND 0 �' r-- �( cs aRj ORGANIZATION (Optional) ADDRESS �- ". B'A S 3 5 NO.B31 F030i0�5 1 � CITY, ZIP a '`¢-'t ,02�� PHONE C TOPIC �C, f;�� L D CrA� ac %17/98 16:53 AWP -6 OPS Against LAX Expansion, Structural Damages, Environment, Pollution The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues, The EIR/EIS process is a public process. The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given, point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors. I£ at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe, If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before they can be implemented. Pa31 /24"- 0bi17i9B 16:53 PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 1.1 Jegunao Coll munny 1V1uuting ` Speaker Request Dorm Please print Clearly ORGANIZATION (Optional) ADDRESS" CITY, ZIP nil PHONES NO.831 P032i045 �r drsii'riyt 16 :53 AwP -6 OP5 C6Nl6k Airport Size, Noise and Safety The city of Los Angles is responsible for the Layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Flan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIRIEIS process is a public process. The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAIC can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport, Current aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before they can be implemented. 2e/17/9e 16:53 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 ZI JGguiluu %'Ummuiuty l�lvv«••� Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NAA ORGANIZATION (Optional) ADDRESS CITY, ZIP PHONE, , r'6? TOPIC NO.e31 P034i045 jg, et/17i98 16:54 AWP -6 Noise and Air Pollution, Property Rights The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX.) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues, The EIR/EIS process is a public process. The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is, a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hoLu based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate, Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before they can be implemented, F2351e4 ae /!7i9e 16:54 AWF -6 OPS CENTER 4 312 322 7137 rl Jegunuo Community IVICCl1I% 14 Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NAME NO.931 P036i245 ORGANIZATION (Optional) / ADDRESS � -�. r P CITY, ZIP � 1 PHONE 974-7 , TOPIC ' 'i IV 4 26/17/96 16 :54 Expansion at George Air Force Base Near Twenty -Nine Palms and Adelanto The former George Air Force Base is located in Vietorville, California, approximately 100 road miles from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). The base is now a civilian airport and is known as Southern California Xnternational Airport (VCV). The Federal Aviation Administration has issued a Federal Aviation Regulation Part 139 Operating Certificate to VCV. This means the airport is authorized to conduct commercial passenger operations involving aircraft with 30 seats or more. Passenger operations by aircraft with less than 30 seats are also authorized, The military currently charters civilian aircraft to fly troops and equipment into VCV for the purpose of conducting training maneuvers at nearby Fort Irwin. There are no regularly scheduled commercial flights available to the general public into and out of VCV. VCV has the potential to siphon off some of the demand for aviation services that is accommodated by LAX and other commercial airports in the Los Angles Basin. Market forces will dictate the level of service that commercial passenger and cargo airlines might chose to provide at VCV, There are no regulatory measures available that could force growth at VCV. P237i045 06/17/96 16:54 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 E1 Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NAME \ % 6 AX K) N0.631 F03d�045 ORGANIZATION (Optional) ! A)�IC 4+t T_ L �4� L).A t AJ&Fvt-� ADDRESS CITY, ZIP j q0O qS PHONE 6q.5 o-302,3 TOPIC 6 c�rJ ��n � - t'Dc�a'- N01-91�— L � � 06/17/99 16:54 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 Sound Contour Noise Levels The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and any proposed recontiguration. The City is obligated to follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIMIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a public process, The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX froze a procedural standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in tinie the demand for takeoffs and landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright. Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe, If future changes are required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before they can be implemented. P239 045 08/17/98 16:54 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.831 P242/24E El Segundo Community Meeting Speaker request Form Please print Cearly ORGANIZATION (Optional) ADDRESS 3 W a 1 CG - ►rY. c�.l CITY,ZIP �� S�c%1�..�v�G1.27 PHONE IrlAY1G {�11 �E'av`.ry,l�N�, h��' TOPIC l5 G "Yv)� Prc-'o41 ncii 2 � V'Ncme..s , Y GY,SOrIrg a LA v� CAe r 5 � I r <J w � 5�,,,rtid p roo-�- %ow�C S i ►it � 1 5��+�h�G �,.��C� e. i I, vZ �-�vJ yv -/ hc,vne� suur�c{ �YOa�ed ? 5 06 /17 /98 16:55 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NO.831 P041i045 Soundproofing of Homes ins El Segundo Tile city of El Segundo is sponsoring the noise abatement program. Eighty percent of the funding is provided through a Federal Aviation Administration grant. The contact person for E1 Segundo's noise abatement program is Harvey Holden, and his telephone number is (310) 607 -2202, 06/17/96 16:55 PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.631 P042i24E Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question, %ve are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and expressing an interest in aviation safety. As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo Nigh School on April 28, 1998, the Soitillet7t California Task Forre -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state, local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southem California, we are confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with the need for a community- friendly environment. if you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our Internet site at and click on "Southern California Task Force" for further information on the group's activities. 9 13 W � � 'ew of , � o�r aA � VL-�A� +4101W -2- &kL&b " 1, t MR ANDREW STEFANSKI (3[0) 3 3 7 Z 7296 W 85TH ST 4 LOS ANGELES CA 900452431 FMAY 1 9 �g AlR�'OR�S 0!VlS;O�� OE %i7i98 16:55 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NO.E31 PO43iO45 A — At' V' -T-'r A 6 iE a 0 — � "a pu)oo 11'c tip' r4( rd-0-4 — rY, �4.2�•9� A- ktk�- �ff, wed ,&�2.WLa4-42, a,5 C"�► Y` + &xJ t l) ,' 1-4 to 0 C.i-Q vt,_ J S J44,) 114-1 1�L 's FE TY Y. Ll �'1�'� 1. 2 �.u/ OJ^ " /Qre -e� � a L,00�e4� 4v 4x- 1a,4 71 rL17yf /1�1,W�11 Kcx s of vv-{- 4v� ce, `o1cm LAJ ,� J- g,A mmu-0, � � � w I we- ti 1,✓ ©-f +�l MR ANDREW STEFANSKI � 7296 W 85TH ST 641 LOS ANGELPS CA 90045 -2431 2E/17/96 16:55 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 310 322 7137 NO.631 P244i24"— v � ^EEES .'.II I/L E a Ir'.n; g` Ilt f a If rill ,� ' :1� w 1f= 1' rw •+' 'tsar � ei vMrnifl �� g a'' rp '� .•,\ 1 ., �yS \ SY19'�0� M I I �. � � i '� IUY�' en�lilr � r —, ��uinrM F � t ?�, . ��d �JUJ � '\i♦ � I Q�, f• �� '' �nlln'1M s t _fit �)I�r 1 r111N1 CPA t �Y IVO S feed, i•�� q '? I:y� ,nn� F, �� ,` I:.,t °� '� n� a \r r,tt ►AQC _: •� . `� iA11'� �� 7?ly�',� �! ' �rr� / ✓\� , G',, r 4 .a�l�',,, � �t�'�43�� .I � � ,col.l4 I .i AO N I v JA (1 5 r iF r- ,itii 11 Ar �IY�inn � � Sl.'ul !c'ne G■ �� (4 y.� � IS,rpl it Of syl r rr w? ��ir �f��. „�,�riaa,� }1, E � I J � Q�i�� {l 3Sf �.-� �� I i��jii1�F� i71 n• �. ,�. �� rprF' 1: env* n •I� w'iut1AM ■ Z■ '�A4! ' �iy1 ^ I AV % W f •/Y IA U yr ' 1S r1Y 11 r7 it _ Y ,' n�i �,Y It ail ,+ 111 G ” `� � liirf i 11 • r �; - � 1 /y�,1 1 pMr AtlrM ..) .fr?., ! •',i �1 tY 1g ;,� ^r � i. ^ 1 f' - � W �'s vj V11 M0` 1 w J '1 I 1 1. v I r s JO ( )• 1� rho YM is C n rr X. 1 � a LU 1411,�It dlota,.s'L } y to 9 1 61 CD Q1µ ;r•l " ��. ^.��3 r V �- ,, Y.,� : �s � rlr AV Nol .� � I+ rvlrr o r . lr `•a, _ k _� _ �},:I \ 4 b �Inuw �. r �f Lti 4 Q IT 91 Y 111 �t ` I ' f �1 I r i •�� r�i► AV ANO ' +AS 1 � d ✓f ;r t� I at —1T (x,.11 «ice i I1 1 1��1 �• � � i�'� /t �O% /Ili_ � — . ^.�-- ---- -• — r ti � 06 /17i9B 16:56 AWP -6 OPS Safety The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is not aware of any federal regulation that requires a lateral distance of 1,100 feet from a runway to residential property. There is no such FAA regulation. FAA standards do identify the need for Runway Protection Zones (RPZ) off the ends of each runway. The RPZ `s function is to enhance the protection of people and property on the ground. The RPZ is trapezoidal in shape and centered about the extended runway centerline. In most cases the RPZ begins 200 feet beyond the end of the runway. RPZ size is a function of a number of factors. At LAX the inner width of each RPZ is 1,000 feet, the length is 2,500 feet, and the outer width is 1,750 feet. This is the maximum R.PZ size required by FAA standards. The RPZ should be clear of residences and places of public assembly, including schools. FAA standards also identify the need for a Building Restriction Line (BRL) to identify suitable building area locations on airports (it is recommended the airport property line extend at least to the limits of the BRL). At LAX, the, BRLs run parallel to each outboard runway at a lateral distance of 750 feet from the runway centerline. This meets FAA standards. The schools in question are outside the BRL. The 'LAX expansion concept that proposes a new north runway would shift the two existing north runways further south. The schools would remain outside the BRL even with the addition of a new north runway. PO4t /don AUG. -17' 98(MON) 15:57 ADMIN TRANSACTION REPORT Transmission Transaction(s) completed TEL:310 322 7137 P. 001 NO. TX DATE /TIME DESTINATION DURATION PGS. RESULT MODE 742 AUG. 17 15:54 7147555648 0° 01' 30" 005 OK N ECM Oct Y O*6 'Lr► _ O �S�GU�4 FAX TRANSMITTAL Date: August 18, 1998 Operator's Initials: sm ow Bill Dunmore FROM: James Hansen Director of Economic Development City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 310 - 607 -2249 FAX: 310- 322 -7137 SUBJECT: Proposed Electronic Communication Policy FAX NO: 714 - 755 -5648 Total number of pages transmitted (including this one): 5 08/17/96 16:40 PWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 Federal Aviation Administration Western- Pacific /;legion Hawthorne, California Date: To: ' f % l�-� Gen dYL From: No. of pages including cover: NC.830 P221/224 Phone: (310) 725 -3550 Fax: (310) 536 -8400 ,5&t 01 COMMENTS: Office of fh. Regional Administrator 08 /17 /96 16:40 U.S. Department of Transportotion Federal Aviation Administration 1 I (r r» AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 318 322 7137 Dear Citizen: office of the Regional Administrator Western - Pacific Region NC.630 P002/224 P. 0. Box 92007 Worldway Postal Center Los Angeles, CA 90009 Thank you for attending the community meeting held at E1 Segundo High School on Tuesday, April 28, 1996. Enclosed is the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) response to the issue you noted that evening on the speaker request form. We appreciate your attendance at the meeting and your interest in aviation safety. Sincerely, William C. Withycombe Regional Administrator Enclosure cc: Congresswoman .lane Harman 26/17/96 16:42 AwP -6 CPS CENTER 4 312 322 7137 NC.632 P223i224 E1 Segundo Communitry Meeting Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NAME l ORGANIZATION (Optional) W eb �� 2e, ADDRESS CITY, ZIP PHONE TOPIC 06i1ri96 16:40 PWP -6 CPS CENTER Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question, we are taking this oppommity to thank you for attendv.ig the community meeting and expressing an interest in aviation safety. As mentioned by the FAA panel at E1 Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state, local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with the need for a community - friendly environment, If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our Internet site at www.awp.f .gov and click on "Southern California Task Force" for further information on the group's activities, P004/224 08/17/98 16:40 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NO.830 P205/224 E1 Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NA UM 1�.� � _ 1:7 C0ocnu��-r� ORGANIZATION (Optional) Co N Gc z t-� 12E S , ► >c 1- ADDRESS 'Z.-2-`Y W t-4.) -r ),.j t_-) �T , CITY, ZTP S��a �� C 7 G� `�6 N,._PHONE 3 2 2 -qv C, I I TOPIg� t,..(Y.r1 t7 t�1S t o.2 A ►1��A� �R� zU�.�r'l S , tV2rJ �q(�, v aS TrtAi' cAVSr= NW$L Vsd9A7' 0vr.1 TT.) I�t•� t- tur�� rr✓t u-+x%2 7-H,4, AV / Or►Q' Li 06/17/96 16:40 AWP -6 CPS Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question, we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attenduig the community meeting and expressing an interest in aviation safety. As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communitics concerned with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state, local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with the need for a community- friendly environment. If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our Internet site at www.awp.faa.gov and click on "Southern California Task Force" for further information on the group's activities, P206/224 08i17/9B 16:40 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 E1 Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NO.B30 P007/024 NAME F; wv sf-= A N s i<� I ORGANIZATION (Optional) Arl"'o r A C ADDRESS CITY, ZIP, � SL-PHONEE Y72 2 TOPIC &—c--c— 4 ae /17i98 16:40 AWP -6 OPS CENTER Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question, we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and expressing an interest in aviation safety. As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on Apri.128, 1998, the Southern California Task Face -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state, local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with the need for a community - friendly environment. If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information., please feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our Internet site at www.a .faa.gov and click on "Southern California Task Force" for further information on the group's activities. POOS 024 06/17/98 16:41 PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.830 P023/224 • El Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NAME. Yrli0- ORGANIZATION (Optional) AT1T)RFS� i S w a kt� 5- ') I--- - CITY, ZIPTEDUV-) bU Gs �1 PHONE TaPIC �.v�,� Fir Gl -17S T��1 vF tPUC-, en,5 T- -1—C au�fS i / ?•t�' -- c ��, vv � wL•`; �� ► �1U �n S Cam" t 1••) rtt� i.v A K�'' ✓� lr 08/17/96 16:41 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.630 P012/224 Because your speaker request form didnot indicate a clear or specific topic: or question, we are taking this oppominity to thank you for attending the community meeting and expressing an interest in aviation safety. As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 199S, the Souther -17 California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvoy in December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned with. noise associated witli aviation operations. With the contin,tred cooperation of state, local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are confident that the demand of the Amcncan people for safe air travel can be balanced with the need for a contlnunity- friendly environment, if you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our haternet site at \:v"-%v.awp.faa.gov and click on "Southern California Task Force" for further information on the group's activities. 08/17/98 16:41 AwP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 El Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Requestform Please print Clearly NAME ORGANIZATION (Optional)_ ADDRESS CITY, ZIP j9'0 TOPIC PHONE ATV i NO.e30 P011/224 /'J 06/17/99 16:41 PWP -6 Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question, we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and expressing an interest in aviation safety. As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo high School on April 28, 1998, the Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state, local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with the need for a community- friendly environment. If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our Internet site at www.awp.faa. 0vv and click on "Southern California Task Force" for further information on the group's activities. P2121224 08/17/96 16:41 PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 El Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly r1,�1. ORGANIZATION (Optional) N0.630 P013/224 �i /I ADDRESS -7 CITY, ZIP_ �/ -7 < l�•y ^ 1, d C G G PHONE TOPIC_ c,•%� %�% c _5 : ( it—,�y c., l ` d > 26/17/98 16:41 AwP -6 OPS CENTER Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question, we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and expressing an interest in aviation safety. As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state, local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with the need for a community-friendly environment. If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our Internet site at www.av .faa. ov and click on "South, em California Task Force" for further information on the group's activities. P214i224 r" s 2B /17 /3e 16:41 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NO.630 P015i024 E1 Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NAME E 9 10- 3-O H NS O N ORGANIZATION (Optional) ADDRESS (y 1�( C--. 5?cA r1012C'' A V CITY, ZIP _L L S L; 6-Y ti A G OU X u'�— PHONE TOPIC YO u -T L LC V R N F^ IZhF T`I, VV2bllNb okIYLLINe' A l4 L0 T ��a�?' slaP�� ?'7 4KT' *(�1� `1S L f 1'V G Q K A J K Pco NOT' l4_N'arte_ 5AF TY 01V Tti6 Aow ,D v4 lN(1,Lk0&.5 TNT ttAI-WKCS 0� `D ?AAPr -1C C0N(.lrt7l0Ao- 4�I✓1D TO >c( C OBi17i9B 16:41 AWP -6 CPS CENTER Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question, we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and expressing an interest in aviation safety. As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by }AAA Administrator Jane Garvey in December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned with noise associated with aviation operations. With ile continued cooperation of state, local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with the need for a community- friendly environutent. If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our Internet site at www.an.faa.gov and click on ''Southern California Task Force" for further information on the group's activities. PC16/024 0e/17/9e 16:42 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NC.e30 P017/024 c� oo 4' El Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form ,Please print Clearly NAME ORGANIZATION (Optional) &jM3 >D ADDRESS CITY, ZIP— ��DJ1�JD o gGbf- Gtq— PHONE TOPIC A015EL 5� e 08/17/98 16:42 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question, we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and expressing an interest in aviation safety. As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by IZAA Administrator Jane Garvey in December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state, local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with the need for a community -f iendly environment, if you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our Internet site at w_ww.awp.faa._gov_ and click on "Southern California Task Force" for further information on the group's activities. P018/024 08/17/98 16:42 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NC.930 P019i224 E1 Segundo Communit i Meeting Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NAME ORGANIZATION (Optional) ADDRESS CITY, ZIP S ri N �' PHONE / d 670 3 6'.Z Y TOPIC 5 -: f A M 08/17/98 16:42 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question, we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and expressing an interest in aviation safety. As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state, local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with the need for a community- fhendly environment. if you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our Internet site at www.awp.faa.gov, and click on "Southern California Task Force" for further information on the group's activities. P222/024 05/!7/98 16:42 AWF -S CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NC.d30 Pali El Segundo Communioi Meeting Speaker Request Form please print Clearly NAME t /5K ORGANIZATION (Optional) CITY, ZiP LA PH0NE�� TOPIC 6 08/17/98 16:42 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 ' J 1• Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question, we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and expressing an interest in aviation safety. As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the Sauthe, n California ?ask Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the: citizens of communities concerned with noise associated with aviation operations. With 1he continued cooperation of state, local, colmty and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with the need for a community - friendly environment. If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further informations, please feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our Internet site at www.awp.faa.gov and click ou "Southern California Task Force" for further information on the group's activities. P022/024 06/17/96 16:43 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 El Segundo Community Meeting Speaker Request Form Please print Clearly NAME I V � NO.632 P223/224 ,.ADO r ORGANIZATION (Optional) ADDRESS CITY ZIP_ /"t. --9 �Z�[ Z !� PHONE `� 6 TOPIC 1 R (T I 0 39/17i9e 16:43 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question, we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and expressing an interest in aviation safety, As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of cornmuruties concerned with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state, local, cowity and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are confident that the demand of the American people for :safe air travel can be balanced with the need for a community- friendly environment. If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our Internet site at w_ww.awp.faa -90v and click on "Southern California Task Force" for further information on the group's activities. P024i024 0ei1Bi98 17:04 0 U.S. Department of 7rar%sportauon Federal Avlation Administration PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 .f Edward Mitchell 716 304' Street Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Dear, Mr. Mitchell: PQ Box 91007 WesternPpdffc Region worldway Postal Center Los Arogelet CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at Jength. Some very positive and effective proposals havrr, been introduced, Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near fur ,ire you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these compiex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, Alton D. Scot Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western - Pacific Region 25/19/9G 17:04 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 P.O. Box 92007 WesterrrPadlk Region worldway Postal Center Los Arg Wes. CA 90009 US. Department of - rrw%sporiatlon Federal Aviation Administration Y Paul Mullin 1405 Magnolia Avenue Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Dear, Mr. Mullin: We received your continents along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced, Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the eery near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the I=AA Web Page at www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all'Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Tl=k you for your comments. Sincerely, Afton D. Sco c Manager, Air Traffic Operations 13ranch FAA Western - Pacific Region 08/18/96 17:04 PwP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 WesreR'►PadfiC Rlcfon d6w US. Oepar~t of 7rampartetfon Federal Aviation Administration 't Linda Nichols 434 261" Place Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Dear, Ms. Nichols: P/0. Boa 920W Worloway Postal Center Los Anca elai G 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you than, the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area, Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these con,,plex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of tape initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, Alton D. Scott Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Westerij- Pacific Rcgion aSi1Si98 17:04 Ow uS Department of Transportatan Federal Avlation Administration AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 'If Barry Weiss 241 Rees Street Playa del Rey, CA 90293 Dear, Mr. Weiss: P.D. Box 92007 WestemPadlk Region Worloway Postai tenter Les Angeles. G 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area, Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near fdture you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report, We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at w%vw.aNvp.faa.gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those Nye are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, to 17. ScottC Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western- Pacific Region 08 /19 /99 17:04 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 06.04 WestefTH adnc Region LL& Depwtment of Trw aportatlon Federal Aviation Administration 'f Peggy Stone 408 Sunridge Street Playa del Rey, CA 90293 Dear, Ms. Stone: P.O. Box 92007 Worldway Portal Center LOS Ang elm CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of Elie SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of Fl Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length, Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force, Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force interim Report and again in the Final Report. �Ve invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, Alton D. Scott Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western - Pacific Region 0B/18/9B 17:05 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 310 322 7137 �� WesterrtPadflc Reglon US DaPWVTwnt of Trw%spartatbn Federal Avlabon Administration .f Douglas Cully 7336 Rindge Avenue Playa del Rey, CA 90293 Dear, Mr. Cully: Nc.e60 P207i029 Pa BOX 921W7 Worltlway Postal Center Los Angeles, CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns, We assure you that, the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at wwvv.awp.faa.gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from OUT community meetings. Thank you for your comments, Sincer ly, Altcn D. Scott -c" Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western - Pacific Region 28 /19 /9B 17:05 rr US. DepwV►wnt of TYanziporubon Federal Aviation Administration PWF -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 Joe McFadden 132 Waterview Street Playa del Rey, CA 90293 Dear, Mr. McFadden: PD. Box 42007 Western- Pacfnc Reglon Warlawry Poscal Center Los Angeles, U 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns, We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced, Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Las Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force, Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration, While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at Nvww,awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments, Sincerely, A on LD.Scott Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western - Pacific Region 08i1di99 17:05 U.S. Department of Tranaportatlon Federal Aviation Administration AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 'f Jack Kenton 835 Dune Street El Seguendo, CA 90245 Dear, Mr. Kenton: PA. Box 9200 Westem- PACIFY Region Wortdway Portal Cencer Lis Angeles, CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Parts and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration, While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa.gov. liere you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments, Sincerely, E11 n D, Sco Manager, Air Traffic Operations Braneli FAA Western- Pacific Region 08/18/98 1 7:05 AwP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 r� u's taepeAment of Ttarwportation Federal Avla6an Administration .r Marian Fine 737 West Mariposa Avenue El Seguendo, CA 90245 Dear, Ms. Fine: Pa Box 92007 Westernfadnc Rtglon Worldway postal Center Los Ang e!es, CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue -of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced, Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area, Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa,gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, Alton D. Scott Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western- PaciFic Region 08i18i98 17.06 06.00 t1S Department of Trw%spartatlon Federal AVIsOon Administration AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 't Robert Choquette 224 Whiting Street El Seguendo, CA 94245 Dear, Mr. Choquette: PA. Box 92007 Westerr�-Padfk Reglan Wortdway P cMal Center Los Angeles, CA 90W9 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area, Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration, While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task: Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Wage at www.awp,faa.gov. )Jere you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, Alton D, Scott Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Wcstern -Paeif e Region 0Si18i9B 17 06 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 D WesternPadlk Region u.S Department or TransportaWm Federal Aviation Administration �f John Gaines 441 Kansas Street El Seguendo, CA 90245 Dear, Mr, Gaines; P.0- Box 92007 Wonaway Postal Center Los Angeles, G 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length, Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are auively participating in the task force. Their cooperatil)n has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa.gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings "thank you for your comments. Sinc ly, Alton D. Scott Manager, Air Traffic Operations I3rinch FAA Western- Pacific Region P012i02S LEi1Bi98 17:05 f 4W U.S. Department Cr Transportatbn Federal Aviation Administration ALJP -5 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 Nancy Johns 834 Dune Street El Seguendo, CA 90245 Dear, Ms. Johns: PA. Box 92007 Westernwaciflc Region Wortaway Postal Center LAS Ang eies. CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require ;study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force, Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, the are confident that in the very near future you wit; notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web page at w%vw.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings- Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, Alton Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western- Prcil?c region 08/18/98 17:06 PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 �1 Western-Prdfk Reglon U.S Department of pw%sportaWn Federal Aviation Adnihstration 'f Sam Edgerton 44 20" Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear, Mr. Edgerton: P.O. Box 920W WoMawey PostA Center Los Angeles, CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns, We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of Et Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force I terim Report and again in the Final Report, We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, Alton D Sc Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western - Pacific Region 09/18/99 17:07 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 Ow WauenWadnc Region Ua Department of TramportaWn Federal Aviation Administration �f Sherry Sotres 2011 Manhattan Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear, Ms. Sotres: PA. Box 92007 Womway Postal Center Los Angeles, CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task; Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park: and other areas are discussed at length, Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task- Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, A ton D Scoi� Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western - Pacific Region P2:Oi029 06 116138 17:07 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.860 P016/228 4W US Department of T?ansportation Federal Aviation Administration 'r Anne Sullivan 60 180 Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear, Ms. Sullivan: Westernkbacuric Region P.Q Box 92007 WohGway Postal Cuter Los "eies, CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns, We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park: and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force, Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force an the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings, Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, C� Alton D. Scot Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western - Pacific Region 06/16/96 17:07 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 QWestem�Padnc Region US. Departrnent of TYamportaWn Federal Aviation Administration .f Robert Woodie 430 291h Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear, Mr. Woodie: P.O. Box 92007 Worraway Postal Cenrer Los Angre" a 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area., Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force interim Report and again in the Final Report, We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.fan.gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from oLUr community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Si rely, �r Alton D. c t � Manager, Air Traffic Operations Brancli FAA Western - Pacific Region 08/18/98 17.07 RWP -6 OPS CENTER PA. Box 92007 Western,fadrk Regan Warlaway Pascal Center Los Anq eles, [,A 90009 115. Department al TransportaWn Federal Aviation Administration Joanne McFarland 6712 West 871" place Los Angeles, CA 90045 Dear, Ms. McFarland: We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that Nye can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues, Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report, We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our con - nunity meetings. Thank you for your comments Sincerely, 1 Alron D. Scott Nlaugcr, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western - Pacific Region 0Bi18 /ge 17:oe f5w US. Department of Tramportatlon Federal Aviation Administration AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 Mathew Hetz 6211 West 75"' Street Los Angeles, CA 90045 Dear, Mr. Hetz; P.O. Box 91007 WesternoPadRC Region Wcrtdway Postal Center Los Angeles, CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation, has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. \'chile we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web page at www.awp.faa,gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives %ve have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments, Sincerely, �f Alton . Sco , Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western- Pacific Region 88/18/98 17:08 0 U,& DepaRmsnt of Ttansportatton Federal Avlatlon Administration AwP -6 CPS CENTER Michael Parris 9608 Aviation Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90045 Dear, Mr, Parris: P.O. Box 92007 Wwtern-PadM Regim Worldway Postal Center Los Angeles, CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns, We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pur.wing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Parl: and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require Study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp,faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we -,ire studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, Aon got lt D. S Mznager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western- PaciFiic Region 29/18/98 17:06 AwP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NO.e60 P021i22 rr US Department Of Transportation Federal AVtatlon Administratlon Joyce Law Krause 4338 Glencoe #1 Marina del Rey, CA 90292 Dear, Ms. Krause: PA. Box 92007 West~adrlc Region Worldway PostM Center Los Angeles, CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns, We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park: and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, l Sc t Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western - Pacific Rebioli 08/18/98 17:86 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.e60 P022/029 WesterrWadlic Reglon U.S. Department of TtanspwUUon Federal Aviation Administration 'r Mike Petach 1209 South Irena Redono Beach, CA 90278 Dear, Mr. Petach: PA. Box 920W Waldway Postal Center Los Ang ele; CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report, We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. "thank YOU for your comments. Sincerely, C� J / Alton D Scott Nfanager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western- Pacific Regioru a6i18ige 17:09 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.860 P023/229 e2w US. Depwterwnt of Ttansportabon Federal Aviation Administration Alan Whitson 2210 Fisher CT Redono Beach, CA 90278 Dear, Mr. Whitson: PA. Box 920M westernf,adfk Region Waldway Posh Center tag /kgeles LA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns, At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park: and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near furire you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa,gov. Here you will find the minutes of a l Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we rice studying, as Nvell as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, Alt n D. cot Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western- Pacific Region 08/18/98 17:09 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 US. Department of Tran9portatlon Federal Aviation Administration .f Robert Acherman 6055 West 750' Place Westchester, CA 90045 Dear, Mr, Acherman: WeitertrPadflc Region Ra Box 92007 Worloway Postal Center Los Angeles G 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of £1 Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park: and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost oll of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many oC the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings, Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, r r AltcA n. Cott e Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western- Pacific Region P024/223 08/18/98 17:09 US. Department of TrwwportAtlon Foderal Aviation Administration AUG 1 5 1998 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 Giwa Neusterer Koshak 7941 Altavan Avenue Westchester, CA 90045 Dear, Ms. Koshak: P.O. Box 92007 WestentiPadfk Reglon worldway PosuM Center tos Angeles, CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have: been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration, While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our conununity meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sinc , Alto D, Scott Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western - Pacific Region 08 %18/98 17:09 rr US Depwtrnant of Trw%sportatbn Federal Aviatlon Administration AWP -6 CPS V Bruce Lathrop 7573 West SP Street Los Angeles, CA 90045 Dear, Mr. Lathrop: Pp, aox 920W We$terTWadnC Reglon WalCway Postal Center Los Angeles. CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area, Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force; on the FAA Web Page at www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, Alton U. Scot Mar►aoer, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western- Pacific Region 08/18/98 17:10 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 'I western-Facile Reglcn Lia Depwtnent of Trwzportation Federal Aviation Adrv1 Nstretion I Harry A. Ford, Jr. 54 Village Circle Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Dear, Mr. Ford: Pja aox 920W %VmWway Postal Center Los Angeles, [A 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pur,uing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of FI Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have: been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp,faa.gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, VnD -r t r Alto. Scott Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western- Pacific Region P227/22S 08/18/98 17:10 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 WesterrtPadric Region oil U.S. DepaAment of Transport$Wm Federal Aviatlon Administration 't John Pasterczyk 1500 23" Street Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Dear, Mr. Pasterczyk; N0.860 ?028/029 p.o. Box 92007 WWC3Way Pasta! Center Los Angeles. CA 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns, We assure you that;the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park; and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require ;;tudy to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration. While we cannot promise that We can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force interim Report and again in the Final Report. We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp,faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetings Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, on D- S o, 5 Manager, Air "traffic Operations Branch FAA Western - Pacific Region 08/18/98 17:10 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 310 322 7137 us DepwtTwnt or 'aw%sportatbn Federal Aviation Administration V Ron Haconhen 436 Third Street Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Dear, Mr. Haeonhem: western.-Fadfk fieglon NO.860 P029/023 PD. Box 92001 worldway Postal Center LOS " eles, G 90009 We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many of your concerns. At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area. Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us develop the proposals under consideration, While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the very near future you Nvill notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these complex issues, Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report, We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at www.awp,faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from our community meetino5. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, Alton D. Scott M,<nager, Air Traffic Operations Branch FAA Western - Pacific Region