Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
1998 AUG 18 CC PACKETAGENDA
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street
The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items.
The Public can participate in the discussion of any item listed on the Agenda. To facilitate your presentation, please place a check
mark beside each item you would like to address on the Agenda provided by the City Clerk, preferably PRIOR to the start of the
meeting. Any other item not listed on the Agenda that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council may be directly addressed
during Public Communications.
Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and give: Your name and address and the organization you
represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits.
Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's
Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2:00 p.m. the prior Tuesday). The request must include a brief
general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 607 -2208.
Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, August 18,1998 - 5:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember John Gaines
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to Ciiy Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on beha f of another, and
employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a
misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250.
CLOSED SESSION: The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law,
including the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, (Lt sue.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's
Real Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation;
and /or discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with the City's
Labor Negotiators as follows:
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a)) -
1. In the Matter of the Application of City of Los Angeles, OAH No. L- 9604014
2. Hill v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 030986
0818985p
Utl���t
3. Hughes v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. BC 185210
4. Mosleh & Greffon v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 025903
5. Fenwick v. Civil Service Commission and City of El Segundo, 2 Civil B121282 and Los Angeles No.
BSO44667.
6. El Segundo v. Kilroy, LASC Case No. YC 031166
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(b): -0- potential case (no further public
statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c): -2- matters.
DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) - City Manager recruitment; and
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957.6) - Meet with
negotiator, City Attorney Mark Hensley, with respect to City Manager position.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) - None.
REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required)
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED:
DATE g
TIME 3a
NAM
0818985p
G AGENDA
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 350 Main Street
The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items.
The Public can participate in the discussion of any item listed on the Agenda. To facilitate your presentation, please place a check
mark beside each item you would like to address on the Agenda provided by the City Clerk, preferably PRIO R to the start of the
meeting. Any other item not listed on the Agenda that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council may be directly addressed
during Public Communications.
Before speaking to the City Council, please come to the podium and give: Your name and address and the organization you
represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits.
Members of the Public may place items on the Agenda by submitting a Written Request to the City Clerk or City Manager's
Office at least six days prior to the City Council Meeting (by 2:00 p.m. the prior Tuesday). The request must include a brief
general description of the business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, 607 -2208.
Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 18,1998 - 7:00 P.M.
Next Resolution #-4-M
Next Ordinance # 1288
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION - Rev. John Svendsen, First Baptist Church of El Segundo
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember John Gaines
PRESENTATIONS
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and
employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a
misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250.
llU�:)�fi�j
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
1. Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only.
Recommendation - Approval.
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS -
2. Proposed (Third Quarter) amendments (unfinished items) to the General Plan and Zoning
Code: 1) Signs; and 6) Amplified Sound Permits; and, a Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impacts in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Environmental Assessment EA -419A, General Plan Amendment 97 -3A, and Zone
Text Amendment ZTA 97-3A. Third quarter Amendments Applicant: City of El Segundo.
Recommendation -
1) Open Continued Public Hearing;
2) Continue public hearing until September 15, 1998; and /or,
3) Other possible action /direction.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS -
Report on the potential for deployment of Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Odor Detection (i.e., "Odor
Sniffer ") devices
Recommendation - Receive and file report.
D. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
4. CHMS Park Vista Management Operating Agreement Extension.
Recommendation - The El Segundo Senior Housing Board unanimously recommends
extending the Park Vista Management Agreement with Community Housing
Management Services for the next two years. Extension beginning January 1, 1999
through December 31, 2000.
5. Schedule interviews of candidates for Community Cable Advisory Committee and Recreation
& Parks Commission( "GCBs ")with filing deadline set for 48 hours prior to interviews.
Recommendation - Set date of interviews for approximately 6:00 p.m., Tuesday,
September 1, 1998.
6. Appropriate $350,000 and approve the LAX Intervention Project for $1,225,000 as discussed
by City Council Jul 21 1998
Recommendation - Appropriate the transfer of funds to the LAX Intervention budget.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a call for
discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next heading of business.
7. Warrant Numbers 249426 - 249745 on Demand Register Summary Number 03 in total amount
of $713,321.00, Warrant Numbers 249749 - 249783 on Demand Register Summary Number 31
in total amount of $137,814.97, and Wire Transfers in the amount of 51 066 723 15
Recommendation - Approve Warrant Demand Register and Authorize staff to release.
Ratify: Payroll and Employee Benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or
agreements; emergency disbursements and /or adjustments; and wire transfers from
07/28/98 to 08/11/98.
8. City Council meeting minutes of August 4, 1998
Recommendation - Approval.
9. Adoption of plans and specifications for construction of a storm drain in the 500 block of
Washington Street -Project No PW 98 -4 (estimated cost= $150.000.00).
Recommendation - Adopt plans and specifications and authorize staff to advertise the
project for receipt of construction bids.
10. Acceptance of the Roller Hockey Rink (Phase 1) construction in Recreation Park (final
contract amount =S55.999.00.
Recommendation -
1) Approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $1,000.
2) Accept the work as complete.
3) Authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the
County Recorder's Office.
11. Authorize stop signs for eastbound and westbound Pine Avenue at Kansas Street
Recommendation - Adopt resolution.
12. Request for approval of two approximately 827.25 square foot wall signs and two temporary
banners for Hughes Electronics to be located on the top of the northeast and southeast facing
walls of 200 North Sepulveda Boulevard (Sign Plan 98 -21) Applicant: Hughes Electronics.
Recommendation -
1) Approve proposed wall signs; and /or,
2) Other possible action /direction.
13. Request for proposals (RFP) and statements of qualifications from qualified consultants to
prepare a requisite update of the General Plan Housing Element.Fiscal Impact: Not to exceed
$30,000-00.
Recommendation - Authorize staff to solicit proposals from qualified consultants.
14. Establishment of a professional services contract with MRH Structural Engineers for
professional plan checking services of stracturai and special high -rise construction projects on
an "as- needed" basis. The amount to be paid the Contractor under this agreement is estimated
to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000); and, therefore requires City Council review and
approval
Recommendation - Approval of the contract for MRH Structural Engineers.
0 0`.9
15. Revised class specification and resolution establishing a new monthly salary range for the job
classification of Community Cable Program Supervisor. Fiscal impact: Funding for the
adjusted salary ranee . included in the Fiscal Year 1998 -99 Operating Budget
Recommendation -
1) Approve Class Specification.
2) Adopt Resolution.
16. Proposed class specification for the new Mid - Management job classification of Business
Services Manager and a Resolution increasing the basic monthly salary range by 5 %. Fiscal
Impact: Funding for the one - position job classification is contained in the Fiscal Year 1998/99
Operating Budget
Recommendation -
1) Approve Class Specification.
2) Adopt Resolution.
17. Proposed Resolution of the City Council of the City of El Segundo, California, providing a
2% salary increase for the City's part-time temporary employees. Fiscal Impact: $12,630
annualized cost. Funding for the increase is contained in the City's 1998 -99 Fiscal Year
Operating Budget
Recommendation - Adopt Resolution.
18. Request for Proposal (.RFP) to 11pdate City Circulation Element.
Recommendation - Approve the RFP and authorize staff to solicit proposals.
19. Approve retaining Lawrence R. Moss & Associates to design and prepare plans for the El
Segundo Skateboard Park Fiscal Impact• $19.500.
Recommendation -
1) Approve an agreement with Lawrence R. Moss & Associates to design and
prepare plans for El Segundo Skateboard Park at a cost of $19,500.
2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.
20. Resolution approving the application for funds in the amount of $33,535 from the Los
Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District per Parcel Discretionary Grant
Program for El Segundo Skateboard Park
Recommendation - Approve Resolution.
21. Resolution approving the application for funds in the amount of $41,000 from the Los
Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District per Parcel Discretionary Grant
Program for El Segundo Roller Hockey Rink.
Recommendation - Approve Resolution.
22. Extension of City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Contracts.
Recommendation - Approve no -cost extension of City's RSI Contracts through end of
calendar year 1998.
23. Authorization to solicit bids for an annual contract for sidewalk, curb and other minor repairs
- Project No PW 98 -3 (budgeted amount $50.000.00).
Recommendation - Authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of bids.
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED:
DATE:
TIME:
NAME: S-
081898ag.doc
}
0 i; �,
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
INTER - DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
DATE August 10, 1998
TO Tim Grimmond
Acting City Manager
FROM Bellur Devaraj
City Engineer *)&eVA^V'
SUBJECT Potential Conflict of Interest Items -
City Council Meeting of August 18, 1998
Is the project within 300 feet of a business or
property owned by a City Council member?
BKD:dr
cc: Ed Schroder, Director of Public Works
NAMEMOMONFLICT.AG2
Mayor
Mayor
Council
Council
Council
Consent Agenda Item
Mike
Pro Tern
Member
Member
Member
Gordon
Sandra
Nancy
John
Kelly
Jacobs
Wernick
Gaines
McDowell
Adoption of plans and specifications for the sidewalk
replacement, handicapped access ramps and new
sidewalks on Grand Avenue:
1. Sidewalk replacement (City -wide) at various locations.
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
2. Handicapped access ramps at various locations.
No
No
No
No
No
3. Grand Avenue sidewalk northside between Illinois
No
No
No
No
No
Street and Sepulveda Boulevard.
Adoption of plans and specifications for the construction of
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
a storm drain in the 500 block of Washington Street.
Authorization to solicit bids for annual sidewalk repair
contract.
Note: Specific work locations have not yet been identified.
BKD:dr
cc: Ed Schroder, Director of Public Works
NAMEMOMONFLICT.AG2
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Special Orders of Business - Public Hearing
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Proposed (Third quarter) amendments (unfinished items) to the General Plan and Zoning Code: 1) Signs; and 6)
Amplified Sound Permits; and, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts in accordance with the California
Environmental Duality Act (CEQA). Environmental Assessment EA -419A, General Plan Amendment 97 -3A, and Zone
Text Amendment ZTA 97 -3A, Third quarter Amendments. Applicant: City of El Segundo.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Open Continued Public Hearing;
2) Continue public hearing until September 15, 1998; and /or,
3) Other possible action /direction.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
On November 18, December 2, January 3, 6, 20, February 3, 17, March 3, and 17, 1998, the City Council held a
continued public hearing on the above referenced project. On March 17, 1998, the City Council adopted Ordinance
No. 1286 to amend the following sections of the City's General Plan, Zoning Code, and Local Coastal Program: A)
Mini - Variances, B -I) Detached Accessory Buildings and B -II) Accessory Buildings, C) Residential Wall Heights,
D) School Parking, E) Coastal Development Permits, and F) TDR's - Transfer of Development Rights, in the
Third Ouarter Amendments packet. At its March 3, 1998 meeting, the Council directed staff to continue the
discussions on Signs and Amplified Sound Permits, which were also a part of the Third quarter amendments. These
two items were then continued to April 21, June 16, 1998, and then to tonight.
DISCUSSION:
On June 16, 1998 (Continued from March 3 and 17, and April 21, 1998), the Council directed staff to continue the
public hearing on Signs and Amplified Sound Permits in order for the City Attorney to review several issues related
to the proposed revisions to the Sign Code, and to provide staff the opportunity to meet with residents and business
owners regarding the development of the revised Amplified Sound Permit regulations. Staff has met with business
owners twice, and residents, but still has not been able to bring closure (i.e., reach consensus) in the discussions,
and the Planning Commission has not yet reviewed any revisions. Therefore, staff requests that the deliberations on
Amplified Sound Permits be continued until September 15, 1998.
(Continued on Next Page )
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. None
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ORIGINATED: Date: 10 August 1998
Bret B Bernard, AICP, Direct r of Planning and Building Safety
REVIEWED BY: Date:
ACTIONFTAKEN:
O 0 10 1 P
iz /cif
p:\zoning \ea419a \ea419a -3. doc
B -2
EA -419A, GPA 97- 3A/ZTA 97 -3A
City Council Staff Report
August 18, 1998
DISCUSSION (Continued):
Page 2
On January 6, 1998, the City Council and Planning Commission held a joint public workshop on the Third quarter
amendments, which included a discussion of proposed modification to the Sign Code. The Council reached a
consensus on all but two sign issues (the size of announcement signs and abatement of abandoned signs). Staff and
the City Attorney requested previous continuances of the discussions on the Sign Code to review abandoned signs.
Staff and the City Attorney have now completed their review of abandoned signs However, staff recommends that
the Council take up the continued deliberations of this topic when the discussion of Amplified Sound Permits are
discussed on September 15, 1998.
The following is a summary of the discussions and actions that have already taken place for the proposed
amendments to signs and amplified sound permits.
1. Signs - Revise Sign requirements, including political signs (GPA & ZTA).
After receiving input from members of the community, the City Council, on January 6, 1998, reviewed the proposed
revisions to the Sign Code (Chapter 20.60 of the El Segundo Municipal Code) and took the following actions on
specific proposed revisions:
Off -Site Signage - The consensus of the Council was to maintain the City's ban on Billboards (off -site signage
in excess of 500 square feet) and the current prohibition on off -site signs within 500 feet of a State or County
Highway. The Council also expressed an interest in possibly permitting certain off -site directional signs to help
businesses which may not be visible from the main thoroughfares in the City and staff has added language
to address this (Section 20.60.080 G). The Council also discussed provisions in the Sign Code to permit
"gateway" and other promotional signs for the City. Staff believes proposed language in the exemption and
public right -of -way sections (Sections 29.60.100 and 20.60.120) in the Sign Code would enable the City to
establish such signage.
2. Pole Signs - The Council majority agreed that it was not appropriate to adopt a General Plan Amendment
which would discourage pole signs in the City until further study is conducted by staff and the Planning
Commission on the appropriate use of pole signs in different parts of the City. The Council accepted the
recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff to bring this item back at a future date with additional
analysis, including a survey of pole sign requirements in other cities, separate from the third quarter
amendments, in order to avoid delaying the rest of the sign amendments and the overall third quarter review.
3. Announcement Signs - The consensus of the Council was to accept the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to add a one year maximum duration for which Announcement Signs (Section 20.60.080 H4.)
could be used for a new development or business. However, no apparent consensus was reached regarding
staff's recommendation to permit announcement signs greater than 100 square feet east of Sepulveda
Boulevard. Therefore, staff would suggest that the City Council consider allowing 150 square feet of signage
east of Sepulveda at it meeting on September 15, 1998, and provide further direction on this issue at that time.
4. Political Signs - The consensus of the Council was to retain the existing regulations for political signs which
permit signs to be a maximum of four (4) square feet, instead of allowing the larger signs as recommended
by the Planning Commission and City Attorney.
5. Flashing and Moving Signs - The Council directed staff to revise the sign requirements for flashing and
moving signs to clarify that flashing and moving signs would only be prohibited if the colors in the sign or their
location would interfere with vehicular safety (Section 20.60.110 I.). Council consensus was to not accept the
Planning Commissions recommendation to prohibit all flashing and moving signs, with specific exemptions.
6. Temporary Signs - The City Council accepted the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff
to list animals or human beings used as temporary signage in subsection of Section (20.60.080 H.), provided
they would not be located on public property or in the public right -of -way.
7. Public Right -of -Way Signs - Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission, staff, and the
City Attorney, the consensus of the City Council was to ensure that no new right was being granted for signs
1-1 0�I t
EA -419A, GPA 97- 3A/ZTA 97 -3A Page 3
City Council Staff Report
August 18, 1998
in the public right -of -way, by deleting Section 20.60.120 B., which allows temporary signs in the public right -of-
way. Since all public signs, emergency, and construction signs are covered in other subsections of this
section, the Council felt it appropriate to eliminate this subsection to prevent signs such as political, real
estate, open house or garage sale signs from being placed in the public right -of -way.
8. Murals and Works of Art - The consensus of the City Council was to accept the recommendation of the
Planning Commission to include regulations for murals in the Sign Code in order to avoid confusion as to what
type of message might be considered a commercial message on a mural versus simply "artwork ". The
proposed revision adds non - commercial Works of Art, such as historical and community murals, as a
permitted use (Section 20.60. 080 M.), and allowing works of art to exceed the 500 square foot sign limit,
without City Council approval. Works of Art intended for commercial purposes would be considered as
signage and regulated the same as other signs in the Zoning Code. Based on the discussion of the Council
and Commission on January 6, 1998, staff reviewed the provisions for murals in residential zones. Staff found
that the proposed sign code did not address murals in residential zones, so staff has added language to
Section 20.60.080 to permit Works of Art in residential zones which are not used for commercial purposes.
9. Abandoned Signs - On January 6, 1998, the Council did not accept the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to permit abandoned signs to continue beyond the 45 day limit listed in Section 9.54.020(m) of
the Municipal Code or the 90 day limit proposed as part of Section 20.60.150 when the building or property
on which the sign is actively available for lease. State law requires that when the Sign Code of a City is
amended, an inventory of illegal and abandoned signs must commence within 120 days of adoption of the sign
code revisions. Within 60 days after the 120 day period, State law requires the City to commence abatement
proceedings against illegal and abandoned signs. Therefore, the existing Municipal Code time frame of 45
days for a abandoned sign to become a public nuisance does not appear to be consistent with State law. As
a result, on February 3, 1998, staff requested additional clarification from the Council to determine if a sign
should be considered abandoned after 45 days or 90 days and to clarify if there would be any circumstances
in which a sign could continue to be used 45 or 90 days after a business has discontinued operation.
The City Attorney had requested that the Council delay its discussion and decisions on abandoned signs so
that he would have time to review these issues with staff. The Sign Code cannot be adopted without provisions
for abandoned signs, as State law requires an inventory and abatement of illegal and abandoned signs within
a certain time frame after the adoption of new sign provisions. The revised Sign Code contains language for
abatement of abandoned signs acceptable to the City Attorney. Staff and the City Attorney recommend that
these revisions be discussed at the September 15, 1998 Council meeting.
2. Amplified Sound Permits - Limit number of Amplified Sound Permits per address to four (4) in any one
calendar year (Chapter 9.06). Applicants may apply for an Entertainment Permit (Chapter 5.36) or an
Adjustment (Chapter 20.78), for construction noise permits, for more than four (4) permits per year
(ZTA).
This item is also a continuation of an item which remained unfinished as part of the Second quarter amendments due
to the City Attorneys request to review the legal issues involved with the possible limitation of the number of Amplified
Sound Permits which may be issued per year.
On March 3, 1998, the Council requested that Planning staff work with the business community and residents
impacted by the Amplified Sound Permit regulations and develop consensus on a proposal to revise the regulations.
On March 20 and June 2, 1998, staff met with the operators of several downtown restaurants and one local resident
to discussed the proposed revisions to the Amplified Sound Permit regulations and to receive input on the amplified
sound /entertainment needs of the businesses. Staff requested that the businesses try to develop an "average"
operational plan of amplified entertainment needs of the restaurants which could become the basis for a baseline
number of amplified sound permits that might per permitted. The business operators have submitted a draft of an
"average" operational plan on June 13, 1998, which addresses indoor and outdoor sound amplification. Staff is
requesting that the Council continue the discussion of Amplified Sound Permits until September 15, 1998 in order to
give staff, the business community, and residents additional time to meet and reach a consensus on revisions to the
Amplified Sound Permit regulations and possibly the Entertainment Permit regulations in the El Segundo Municipal
Code (Chapter 5.36).
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 18 August 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Unfinished Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Report on the potential for deployment of Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Odor Detection (i.e.,
'Odor Sniffer') devices.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Receive and File the Report.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting of 07 July 1998, staff was asked by Council
member John Gaines to research the opportunity for placement of 'Odor Sniffer' devices on private properties
adjacent to the city of Los Angeles' Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant ( "Hyperion "). El Segundo's contract
Mitigation Monitor and consultant for Hyperion issues — Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates ( "RBF ") — was
directed by staff to investigate if such devices are available, determine their effectiveness, and estimate their cost(s).
The Report from RBF is attached for your review.
DISCUSSION: With the assistance of the City's Hyperion Mitigation Monitor — RBF, staff has reviewed the
possibility for and advisability of placing "Odor Sniffer" devices on residential properties located next to and /or near
the city of Los Angeles Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant. The full findings of this review are contained in the
attached "ESSM — Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Odor Detection" memorandum from John Nagle and Scott Tatalovich of
RBF. However, the primary conclusions drawn from the Report and subsequent discussions with its authors are
that:
(Continued on next page)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENT:
ESMM — Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Odor Detection memorandum; John Nagle and Scott Tatalovich, RBF; 27 July
1998.
FISCAL IMPACT: Potentially significant.
(Check one) Operating Budget — Capital Improvement Budget:
Amount Requested:
-0-
Project Account Budget:
-0-
Project/Account Balance:
-0-
Account Number:
None
Project Phase:
N/A
Appropriation Required - Yes X No
No monies have been budgeted, to date, for the purchase of any 'Odor Sniffer' devices or associated equipment. At
a cost of $2,000 per unit, together with $27,000 to $38,000 in additional costs for the computer connectivity of each
"Odor Sniffer', the overall Fiscal Impacts could be quite significant. If the initial deployment were to include four
homes, for example, the cost could run from $116,400 to $160,400. No City monies have been budgeted for this
project, nor are there (at this time) any other known monetary sources available, such as Mitigation Impact funds
from the City of Los Angeles (Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant). Therefore, any Fiscal Impacts would need to be
handled by the City's General Fund surplus.
ORIGINATED: Date: 12 August 19uts
Bret B Bernar , AICP, ;rector of Planning and Building Safety
REVIEWED BY: Date:
mond, Interim
TAKEN:
er
� 1 -xlre
Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Odor Detection Devices
page #2 —
Citv Council Meeting of 18 August 1998
DISCUSSION: (... continued)
• The mechanical measurement is less effective than the power of the human nose.
• The devices will not necessarily be able to measure all the odors that emanate from the Hyperion Sewage
Treatment Plant, particularly those most malodorous and offensive.
The cost of the system, when it includes the requisite reporting equipment — networked or not — is prohibitive.
It is difficult to determine where these devices should be located. While it would be obvious to locate some
number on the properties most proximate to the Plant (i.e., along Dune Street), odors are regularly reported
from throughout the western residential section of the City. Changing micro - environmental conditions make it
impossible to predict the best location(s) for odor readings.
The information would be inconclusive at best; and, might be used contrary to the best interests of those most
affected by the bi- products of the Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant.
The measurements might well include reading from other sources, most especially bi- products from jet
airplanes arriving and departing from LAX.
It has yet to be demonstrated that these devices are fully effective, let alone for an extended period of time,
outside a controlled and closed environment.
Based upon these findings, it was the opinion of our contract Mitigation Monitors, that it would not serve the best
overall interests of El Segundo to purchase and locate "Odor Sniffers" at this time. Staff concurs with this analysis,
and recommends that such devices not be deployed at the current time.
Hyperion Citizens Forum
The bi- monthly, regularly scheduled "informal" meeting of the EL Segundo representatives to the Hyperion Citizens
Forum ( "HCF ") took place on Wednesday, 12 August 1998. Having received the RBF Report just prior to the HCF
meeting, the members attending were asked for their review and input. It was the consensus of the group, including
City Council member Nancy Wernick, that it would not be advisable to place "Odor Sniffer' devices on the properties
adjacent to and surrounding the Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant at this time.
They indicated that a very similar proposal had been brought before them a number of years ago, and that after
careful review, they had thought the idea not in the best interests of the City or of those impacted by the Hyperion
Sewage Treatment Plant. They questioned the relative effectiveness of the devices compared to the olfactory
powers of the human nose and the overall cost of the endeavor. The group also feared that emissions from moving
sources, most particularly from Los Angeles International Airport ( "LAX "), might also be 'read' and recorded by the
devices, thereby confusing the matter of odor identification.
In addition, consistent with the RBF analysis, the representatives indicated they felt the devices could not detect, and
therefore measure, all of the odors that emanate from the Plant. They expressed fears that, if relied upon as a
"scientific measure ", their human sensory detection might no longer be considered valid by the city of Los Angeles
and other responsible /monitoring parties, such as the South Coast Air Quality District.
The unanimous recommendation of the HCF representatives was not to purchase "Odor Sniffers" and the
accompanying equipment.
P1BLDGWYPERION /bbb (WP Word)
ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS
MEMORANDUM
To: Bret Bernard JN 28537MM
From: John Nagle /Scott Tatalovich
Date: July 27, 1998
Subject: ESMM — Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Odor Detection
Per your request, we have summarized the following information regarding hydrogen sulfide
(H2S) gas odor monitoring.
During this recent investigation into the subject topic, we spoke to several suppliers and other
related odor detection professionals and researched wastewater treatment manuals on odor
detection when compiling this memorandum.
RBF has concluded the following items during this investigation:
1. Hydrogen sulfide gas is the primary source of odor which emanates from the Hyperion
Wastewater Treatment Plant. Other gasses such as methane, also emanate from the
Hyperion WTP, but do not possess the "raw sewage" odor. Some of the typical
hazardous gasses that are present in Wastewater Treatment Plants are shown in Table
1, "Common Dangerous Gases Encountered in Wastewater Collection Systems and at
Wastewater Treatment Plants," adapted from Operation of Wastewater Treatment Plants,
Fourth Edition, Volume II, 1996, prepared by the California State University,
Sacramento Department of Civil Engineering for the Environmental Protection
Agency.
2. The present hydrogen gas detection technology is not capable of providing an
economically effective odor monitoring program for the City of El Segundo at the
perimeter of the Hyperion WTP that would record concentrations in the range of
human odor detection.
3. Most hydrogen sulfide gas detection devices employed at wastewater treatment plants
have been used for regulatory purposes in enclosed or confined spaces.
Professional Service Since 1944
A4fALTON PARKWAY, IRVINE, CA 92618 -2069 • P.O. BOX 57057, IRVINE, CA 92619 -7057 • 949.472.3505 • FAX 949.472.8373
. OFFICES LOCATED THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA AND NEVADA • WEB SITE: www.rbf.com
P,— W —yc� Paw
The following information provides the details of this investigation:
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) gas has a rotten egg odor in small concentrations (less than 10 ppm),
but the human sense of smell is rapidly impaired under higher concentrations. Essentially the
gas is odorless at high concentrations. The gas is colorless, as well. The human nose capable
of detecting H2S gas at a concentration in the range of parts per billion (ppb). The following
limits with respect to the presently available odor detection devices were noted during our
investigation:
• Equipment capable of continuous H2S gas detection, such as the equipment described
in detail below, can detect H2S gas in the parts per million (ppm) range.
• Equipment capable of detecting H2S gas in the range of the parts per billion (ppb) and
lower exists. These devices are, in industry, referred to as odor analyzers, and they
utilize a discrete odor sampling method (they do not sample continuously). This
equipment is meant for laboratory testing and the equipment is very expensive by
comparison to the odor detection devices mentioned above and listed below. Such
equipment is not expected to be effective in the application of odor detection at the
perimeter of the Hyperion Wastewater Treatment Plant (WTP). The analysis
procedure of the equipment is more manual than automatic.
• Additionally, an H2S gas sensitive film placed on a strip of paper does exist and could
detect H2S gas in the ppb concentration range, however, this process is, again, more
manual than automatic, and the concentration, source, and time of detection could not
be objectively identified.
• Most of the noted applications of odor detection devices have been for regulatory
purposes. Wastewater treatment plants (including Hyperion) use these devices to
detect high concentrations of H2S gas in confined spaces for the safety of operations
personnel; it is required equipment. One special open air application of an H2S gas
detection device was identified by a supplier at the Cranberry Township WTP in
Pennsylvania. The device was situated approximately 50 feet back at the four corners
of an open air secondary treatment process, for the purpose of odor detection. As it
was explained to RBF, the WTP wanted to log the number of odor occurrences and the
time of such an occurrence in relation to plant operations at the time of such an
occurrence.
H: \GRP13\PDATA \28537 \WPWIN \MEMO\H2S_ODR3.WPD 2 HYDROGENSULF /DE ODOR DETECTION MEMORANDUM
The following types of devices are available that have continuous H2S gas sampling:
IV. PERSONAL
These devices attach to a belt or shoulder strap and have an alarm signal and may have a
readout for the level of H2S gas.
V. PORTABLE
These devices may be carried by hand and placed near a work site. They have an alarm signal
and may have a meter to indicate level of H2S gas.
VI. STATIONARY
These devices are installed permanently and have an alarm signal and a meter to indicate level
of H2S gas. This type of device is probably the most useful for the consultants understanding
of the purpose of the City of El Segundo's interest. The following applications have been
identified this type of H2S gas analyzer.
A. Direct Meter Readout
1. Single Stand Alone Unit
2. Multiple Stand Alone Units
B. Networked Meter Readout
1. Units Hardwired to a Computer
2. Units Telemetered to a Computer
A. Direct Meter Readout
This type of sampling device refers to the stand alone units which can detect H2S gas. These
devices have the following capabilities:
• Alarm; 70, 93, or 95 db
• Event recording capable of storing the minimum, maximum, and average of the events
which have occurred over one of the following pre -set automatically zeroing cycle times:
1 hour, 8 hours, or 24 hours.
• Stored data is time and date stamped.
These devices could be used in the following ways:
1. Single Stand Alone Unit
Total Equipment Cost $ 2,000
2. Multiple Stand Alone Units
Total Equipment Cost $ 2,000 /Unit
H: \GRP13\PDATA \28537 \WPWIN\MEMO\H2S_ODR3.WPD 3 HYDROGEN SULFIDE ODOR DETECTION MEMORANDUM
The direct meter readout units would require operation and maintenance staff to physically
go to each meter to retrieve the logged data.
B. Networked Meter Readout
These sampling devices are the same device as the direct meter readout units, but contain a
Motorola electronic computer chip that allows several units to be linked together and transfer
recorded data to one central remote control unit. There are compatibility issues with software
and hardware. One method of detection identified by the distributer of the Ultima Gas
Monitor (see attached manufactures brochure) for detecting odors from Hyperion Plant is by
individual sampling units ( Ultima Gas Monitors) linked together with a wire and power source
with an IBM based personal computer that is running under windows NT; Windows 95 or
other is not compatible with the available Lawnworks operational software. The personal
computer would be installed with a Lawnworks software that is capable of receiving signals
from the individual samplers and storing the data on the hard disk. The data could then be
handled in a number of ways including spreadsheets like Microsoft Excel. The following
applications are available to these networked samplers:
1. Units Hardwired to a Computer
If the gas samplers (units) are hardwired to the personal computer (maximum distance
approximately 6,000 feet), then the following costs are estimated:
Gas Sampler (5@ $1,100 /each) $ 5,500
Personal Computer $ 4,000
Software $ 8,100
Power Source $ 500
Conduit, wire, and other required for installation, and installation $ 1,000
Installation, Labor and Training $10,000
Total $ 29,100
2. Units Telemetered to a Computer
If the gas samplers (units) are radio telemetered to the receiving personal computer,
then the following costs are estimated:
Gas Sampler (5 @ 1,100 /each)
$ 5,500
Personal Computer
$ 4,000
Software
$ 8,100
Power Source
$ 500
Radio Telemetry Equipment
$7,500
Conduit, wire, and other required for installation, and installation
$ 1,000
Installation, Labor and Training
13,500
OV] F5
Total $ 40,100
H: \GRP13\PDATA \28537 \WPWIN \MEMO\H2S_ODR3.WPD 4 HYDROGEN SULFIDE ODOR DETECTION MEMORANDUM
[1] Includes a remote terminal unit. Does not include additional equipment, which
may be required at City Operations Center.
No limit to the number of gas samplers that could be strung together was identified.
The local representative that was contacted regarding the Ultima product provided RBF with
the above estimated costs on a budgeting basis. All costs are subject to change upon further
discussion and detailing of the products that would be required to perform the odor detection
that is desired by the City of El Segundo.
Additionally, the following operational issues were identified during conversations with the
odor detection equipment suppliers:
1. What distance can the sensor and transmitter be separated?
Approximately 6,000 feet by hard wire connection.
2. Where have sensors been installed (On the ground, off the ground at what elevation)?
The units could be installed on the ground or elevated on a post. The units are weather
proof. Hydrogen sulfide gas is denser than air and therefore heavier and would
normally flow under air, but that is in a dense cloud. Diffused in air, hydrogen sulfide
gas would mix and travel with the air currents.
3. How often can the unit sample?
The unit samples continuously.
4. What are the costs and equipment involved with remote calibration of the unit?
Calibration of the unit requires the use of two bottles of gas. One is Oxygen and the
second would be the gas being metered, in this case hydrogen sulfide. The calibration
involves the metering of each gas for approximately 30 seconds. The oxygen for zero
calibration, and the hydrogen sulfide for metering calibration. The hydrogen sulfide
gas is canistered at 40 ppm. Due to the reactivity of the hydrogen sulfide the gas
quickly loses concentration. Therefore the hydrogen sulfide gas bottles are only good
for approximately 9 months of storage. The remote calibration of the unit would
involve a radio or wire hookup and the proper software. A price was not associated
with remote calibration equipment, but there would be a difference in the software
required.
5. When the unit is installed does it come with support to train staff on its use?
U 0 0 1 Yes, the units can be sold separately or with the manufactures support services. The
H: \GRP13\PDATA \28537 \WPWIN\MEMO\H2S_ODR3.WPD 5 HYDROGEN SULFIDE ODOR DETECTION MEMORANDUM
PC
7.
0
support services would include software installation setup and a training session on the
software.
Can the data be stored and then downloaded at anytime?
Data would be transferred realtime to the remote personal computer operating on a
lawnworks software package.
Can the unit operate on a battery?
Yes, the unit requires less than less than 4mA of power to operate and may be run from
a maintained battery charge or from a 110 volt electrical power supply with the use of
an AC to DC power rectifier and step -down transformer to convert to 24 volt.
Where will the data be transmitted?
Data transmitted from the samplers could be transferred to any data logging device that
is available to the City which can take a 4 -20 mA signal or a 4 -9 kHz signal.
Does the City need equipment to receive the data?
Yes, the City would more than likely require a radio telemetered system, to transmit the
data from the samplers to the City's offices where a personal computer could interpret,
log, and record the data with the use of the proper software.
u0' }2C
H: \GRP13\PDATA\ 28537 \WPWIN \MEMO\ff2S_ODR3.WPD V HYDROGEN SULFIDE ODOR DETECTIONMFMORANDUM
t
TA $L F. 1
Safety 263
COMMON DANGEROUS GASES ENCOUNTERED IN WASTEWATER COLLECTION
SYSTEMS AND
AT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS'
Explosive
Specific Range (% by
Gravity volume in air)
Common Properties
Physiological Effects
Simplest and
P
or Vapor
Chemical Density" Lower Upper
(Percentages below
are percent in air
(Percentages below
are percent in air
Most Common
Cheapest Safe
Name
of Gas Formula (Air = 1) Limit Limit
by volume)
by volume)
Sources in Sewers
Method of Testingt
Oxygen O 1.11 Not flammable
Colorless, odorless,
Noma] air contains
Oxygen depletion
Oxygen deficiency
indicator.
z
(In Air)
tasteless, non-
20.93% of OZ. If O,
from poor ventila-
poisonous gas. Sup-
is less than 19.5 %,
tion and absorption
ports combustion.
do not enter space
or chemical
without respiratory
consumption of
protection.
available O2.
Gasoline CSH„ 3.0 to 1.3 7.0
Colorless, odor
Anesthetic effects
inhaled.
Leaking storage
tanks, discharges
1. Combustible gas
indicator.
Vapor to 4.0
noticeable in 0.03%
Flammable.
when
2.43% rapidly fatal.
from garages, and
2. Oxygen defi-
C,Hp
Explosive.
1.1 % to 2.2%
commercial or home
ciency indicator
dangerous for even
dry- cleaning
for concentrations
short exposure.
operations.
over 0.3 %.
Carbon CO 0.97 12.5 74.2
Colorless, odorless,
Hemoglobin of
Manufactured
CO ampoules.
Monoxide
non- irritating.
blood has strong
fuel gas.
Tasteless.
affinity for gas
Flammable.
causing oxygen
Explosive.
starvation. 0.2 to
0.25% causes
unconsciousness in
30 minutes.
Hydrogen H2 0.07 4.0 74.2
Colorless, odorless,
Acts mechanically
Manufactured
Combustible gas
indicator.
tastless, non-
to deprive tissues of
fuel gas.
poisonous, flam-
oxygen. Does not
mable. Explosive.
support life. A
Propagateg Tae
simple asphyxiant.
rapidly; v ry
dangero
Methane CH, 0.55 5.0 15.0
Colorless, tasteless,
See hydrogen.
Natural al g
1 Combustible gas
odorless, non-
fuel ash
9 9• 9
indicator.
poisonous. Flam-
gas found in sewers.
2. Oxygen defi-
mable. Explosive.
ciency indicator.
Hydrogen H2S 1.19 4.3 46.0
Rotten egg odor in
small concentrations
Death in few
minutes at 0.2 %.
from Petroleum fumes
r.
2. H2S ampoules.
Sulfide
but sense of smell
Paralyzes
gas found in sewers.
rapidly impaired.
respiratory center.
Odor not evident at
high concentrations.
Colorless. Flam-
mable. Explosive.
Poisonous.
Carbon CO, 1.53 Not flammable
Colorless, odorless,
non- flammable. Not
10% cannot be
endured for more
Issues from
carbonaceous strata.
Oxygen deficiency
indicator.
Dioxide
generally present in
than a few minutes.
Gas found in sewers.
dangerous amounts
Acts on nerves of
unless there is
respiration.
already a deficiency
of oxygen.
Nitrogen NZ 0.97 Not flammable
Colorless, tasteless,
See hydrogen.
Issues k strata. Gas a
iOnd aen deficiency
odorless. Non-
flammable. Non-
found in sewers.
poisonous. Principal
constituent of air
(about 79 %).
Ethane C2 H, 1.05 3.1 15.0
Colorless, tasteless,
See hydrogen.
Natural gas.
Combustible gas
indicator.
odorless, non-
poisonous. Flam-
mable. Explosive.
Chlorine Cl, 2.5 Not flammable
Greenish yellow
Respiratory irritant,
Leaking pipe
Chlorine detector.
Odor. Strong
Not explosive
gas, or amber color
liquid under
irritating to eyes
and mucous mem-
connections.
Overdosage.
ammonia on swab
pressure. Highly
branes. 30 ppm
gives off white fumes.
irritating and
causes coughirig.
penetrating odor.
40 -60 ppm danger -
Highly corrosive
ous in 30 minutes.
in presence of
1,000 ppm apt to be
moisture.
fatal in few breaths.
Sulfur SOZ 2.3 Not flammable
Colorless compressed
Respiratory irritant,
Leaking pipes
Sulfur dioxide
detector. Strong
Dioxide Not explosive
liquified gas with a
irritating to eyes,
and connections.
ammonia on swab
1 n �-1 ,-� I
0 ; 1 _
pungent odor. Highly
corrosive in presence
skin and mucous
membranes.
gives off white fumes.
of moisture.
Gases with a specific gravity less than 1.0 are lighter than air; those more than 1.0 heavier than air.
t The first method given is the preferable testing procedure.
' Originally printed in Water and Sewage Works, August 1953. Adapted from "Manual of Instruction for Sewage Treatment Plant Operators" State of New York
RASA
Product Inf6rmation
y� oar' i r
C C
Q Q
Cy
•
•
MSXs new generation of gas monitoring systems.
Ultimo
Gas Monitor
MSA's Ultimo Gas
Monitor is a completely
self - contained unit
designed for the detec-
tion of combustible
gases, toxic gases or oxy-
gen. The Ultima Monitor
can be connected to
MSA's DAN® 2001 Digital
Network System, Model
5000 or 6000
Instruments, Toxgard®
Monitors or to a user's
own readout device. In
addition, the Ultima Gas
Monitor can operate
completely stand alone
with its LCD display,
alarm indications and
optional relay outputs.
Features
The advanced features of the
Ultimo Monitor provide benefits
never before available in a remote
sensor /transmitter:
• Automatic calibration that elimi-
nates errors due to differences in
procedures.
• Calibration at pre- determined
time /date -with no manual inter.
vention when used with Ultimo
Auto -Col Module.
in Date of last successful calibra-
tion recorded within the Ultima
Monitor.
• Optional Internal relay contacts
for FAULT, WARNING and
ALARM.
• Three levels of alarm including
relay outputs when used with
Ultima Monitor relay module.
• Over LEL detection of certain
combustible gases.
• 'Replace Sensor" indication
when sensor nears its end -of -life.
• Real time clock for time and date
stamping of events.
• Logging of minimum, maximum
and average gas concentrations
over pre - determined time inter-
vals-
• Selectable lock -out of output sig-
nals during calibration to inhibit
alarms and control actions.
• Digital, multi-drop communication
As a complete monitor, the
Ultima Gas Monitor can operate
independently providing a local dis-
play of the gas concentration, along
With an analog output, alarm indices.
tions and optional relay outputs.
Design
All Ultima Gas Monitors, regard-
less of the gas selected for detection,
are housed in a rugged, aluminum,
epoxy - coated condulet enclosure.
With the sensor mounted external to
the enclosure, it is easily replaced by
simply unscrewing the sensor hous-
ing and removing the plug -in sensor.
No tools are ever required.
With its extremely low power con.
sumption (less than 4mA nominal),
the toxic and oxygen sensors can
operate on a single twisted pair of
wires, with high immunity to RFl and
EMI.
All Ultima Monitors are shipped
with an external wiring harness and
are factory calibrated, making them
ready for installation and immediate
operation. The Ultima Monitor's
unique design eliminates all paten.
tiometers, jumpers, switches or any
other type of internal adjustment. In
fact, there is never a need to open
the enclosure during installation and
start-up.
Applications
Ultimo Monitors can be applied
in any application where there is o
threat of the build -up of combustible
gases, the presence of toxic gases,
or oxygen deficiency.
Ultima Monitors ore suitable for
indoor and outdoor applications in
virtually any type of industry includ.
ing refineries, chemical and petro-
chemical facilities, steel mills, water
and waste water, mining, and gener-
al industry.
Assemblies can be specified as
ex losion -Proof or installed intrinsi-
cally safe for use in Class 1, Div I,
Group B, C, D areas and are rated
N EMA 4X.
Combustibles
The Ultima Monitor combustible
gas model features MSA's 1 -S cot -
alytic detector. The 1 -S detector has
proven to be extremely stable and
reliable. It also exhibits a high immu-
nity to silicones, sulfurs and chlori-
nated compounds that shorten the
life of, or poison other combustible
gas detectors.
The combustible model also has
the ability to detect certain com-
bustible gases above the LEL (lower
explosion limit). High concentrations
of combustible gas replace the oxy-
gem necessary to catalytically bum
the gas at the sensor. As a result, a
sensor may show an ambiguous or
what appears to be a normal read-
ing, creating a potentially dangerous
condition.
The Ultima Monitor eliminates
this potential problem, distinguishing
it from all other catalytic combustible
gas detectors.
C.41
C
Toxics and Oxygen C r
Most Ultima toxic and oxygen
models feature electrochemical cells
manufactured by MSA. Built-in
The Ultima Gas Monitor is the ultimate gas monitor for use in
refineries, chemical and petro- chemical, steel mills, water and
waste water, mining and general industrial applications.
temperature compensation enables
proper operation over the entire
operating range.
All Ultima assemblies are shipped
with a unique Sensorgard which pro-
tects the sensor from dirt, water, etc.,
while allowing gas to penetrate into
the unit. The Sensorgard also ads as
a baffle in windy environments.
Operation
Ultima Monitors normally operate
in the diffusion mode, but also can be
used with the Ultima Sampling
Module in applications where R is
necessary or more convenient to draw
a sample from a remote location.
With the remote sensor version,
sensors and transmitters can be sep-
arated for installations where access
to the sensor may be difficult.
Outputs
All Ultimo Monitors come stan-
dard with an LCD display for local
indication of gas readings or any
other stored parameter. Ultima Gas
Monitors have several types of output
options. Frequency or multiplex out-
puts allow for communication specifi-
cally to MSA Instruments. Milliamp
outputs can be connected to MSA
Instruments or a user's own readout
device.
Additionally, with the optional
internal relays, contads are provided
for both WARNING and ALARM lev-
els. A normally- energized Trouble
relay also provides a contact output
for any condition that would not be
considered NORMAL by the Ultima
Gas Monitor.
Alternately, any Ultima Gas
Monitor can be specified with a digi-
tol output for connection to MSA's
DAN 2001 Digital Network System
for gas monitoring.
While all of the information
stored in the Ultimo Gas Monitor can
be accessed locally for viewing on
the front panel LCD, many times it is
desirable to have the capability to
view this information, setup parame-
ters, change alarm levels, etc at o
central location. The DAN 2001
C;.0
Digital Network System accomplishes
these tasks and many others, includ-
ing: multi -drop communication,
common system relays and many
others.(See Data Sheet 1600 -08 for
more information about about MSA's
Digital Network System.
Calibration
Although the Ultima Gas Monitor
features tremendous stability, it is
essential, as with all gas monitors,
that it be calibrated periodically with
the gas of interest to ensure proper
operation.
The Ultimo Monitor reduces the
possibility of human error when per-
forming a calibration. Simply activate
the calibration mode and follow the
instructions on the LCD display. It
instructs the user when to apply zero
and span gas. The Ultima Monitor
automatically makes any necessary
adjustments. There's no guesswork
with the Ultima Gas Monitor. The
actual gas readout is displayed dur-
ing calibration.
When calibration is complete, the
Ultima Monitor automatically returns
to normal operation.
For convenient record keeping,
the Ultima Monitor date stamps the
lost successful calibration.
With use of the optional Auto -Cal
Module, calibration gas can even be
permanently connected. The calibra-
tion process then takes place at des-
ignated time intervals, eliminating
any manual intervention.
Two types of calibration commu-
nication devices are available for the
Ultima Monitor. The Ultima Monitor's
Calibrator and Controller both pro-
vide a digitally encoded signal for
non - intrusive calibration and access
to the advanced features. This
patented technique eliminates tools
as well as the need to open the
enclosure during installation, set up,
or calibration.
When the Ultima Monitor is locat-
ed in hazardous areas, there is no
need to de- classify the area, which
saves time and improves safety. This
eliminates possible access by unou-
thorized personnel, unlike competitive
units which can be accessed by mag.
nets or flashlights for calibration.
Calibrator
I The Ultima
• Monitor Calibrator
offers the industry's
simplest method of
calibration. It is on
i easy -to -use, three -
button device that
allows colibration
and address change of the Ultima
Monitor. The Ultima Monitor
Calibrator is available for those who
do not need to access the Ultima
Monitor's advanced features.
Controller
When access to
all of the Ultima
Monitor's features
is desired, there is
no need to
upgrade or pur-
chose the
advanced features.
- The Ultimo
Monitor Controller
provides complete
access to all features through
its full- function keypad.
The controller is used to:
• Set the real time clock
• Set alarm levels
• Change span -gos values
• Display - date of lost calibration
• Display - minimum, maximum
and average gas values
• Change address
• Set future calibration time /date
in addition to providing basic cal -
ibrotion functions. It is completely
possword- protected.
Both the calibrator and controller
are UL- approved as Intrinsically
Safe. Either can be used to commu-
nicate with all Ultima Monitors;
therefore, only one (1) is needed,
regardless of how many Ultima
Monitors you have.
U1 •
fimcr
Gas Monitor
specifications
Gas Types
Combusn'oies; oxygen; toxic!
Temperature Range
Toxic, and oxygen: -20' to 4-:0" C
.4' to 112' F
(Range on come Maoris may differ.)
Cambustibler. 10° to +9C'C
to -194° F
Drift
Zero Orift:
<5%lyr., ypicclly
Span Drift:
<I0%1yr„ typically
Noise
less than 'I% FS
Accuracy
Repeotobiiiy: = 1% FS or 2 ppm
Linearity: 2 *6 FS (Combustible; 02; CO)
x 10% FS or 2 ppm (whers)
Step Change Response
T20 02 & toxic <12 sec. (Typ. 6 sec.)
T50 O= & toxic! <30 sec. (Typ. 12 sec-)
T50 Cambustioles <8 sec.
T90 Combustibles <20 sec-
Humidity 0 -95% RH, men condensing
Sensor Life
Combustibles: 3 years typically
Toxic & 02: 2 years typically
Full replacement warranty: 1 year
Hazardous Area Rating
02 & Toxic: Class 1, Div 1, Group
8, C & 0, NEMA 4X
(explosion.preci or intrinsically =Fe models only)
Combustibles: Same as above except
Group 8 rating not available on intrinsically
sane version.
Wiring Requirements
mA outour.,
Toxic & OZ: 2 -wire
(whhout accessories or sampling modules)
Combustibles: 3 -wire
Frequency & multiplex outputs: 3 -wira
Digital; see Bulletin 1600 -08
Power Input
mA versions:
Taxies & O : 7 -30 VDC
Combustib }e: 7 -30 VDC (P,150 mA
maximum
Frequency & multiplex versions: Supplied by
MSA controllers
Digital: See Bulletin 1600 -08
Signal Output
4 -20 mA: 2-wire currant sink -or-
3- wire current source -
(combustiblc or Uttima Monitors velh
occ=cries or sampling modules)
Frequency & multiplex: 4 -9 khz
Optional Internal Relays:
Trouble, `Naming, Alarm:
Digital: see Bulletin 1600 -08
Internal Relay Contact Rating
5 amp Q 125 VAC; 5 amp @ 30 VDC
Physical
Sze: 5.25'%V x 4.5'D (13.3cm x 11.4cm)
Weight: 4.5 lb. (2.041 kg)
with optional internal relays:
Size: 5.25 -,v x 5.5'0 (13.3cm x I A -0-1
Weighl: 5.0 lb, (2.268 kg)
0 01) 9 `-
Optional Modules
Relay Module
Provides three levels of alarm
relay outputs along with a normally
energized trouble relay. See Data
Sheet 07 -2019.
Auto -Cal Module
Provides a means `o permanently
connect calibration and zero gas.
The Ultima Monitor then can be pro-
grammed to calibrate itself at pre-
determined time and dote. Relay
Auto -Cal Module combines the Relay
and Auto -Cal Module into a single
assembly. See Data Sheet 07 -2020
Sampling Module
Provides a method to draw a gas
sample into the Ultima t10anitcr. See
Octal Sheet 07 -2023.
Accessories
AC Power Supply
For AC- powered operation of an
Ultima Gas Monitor
Remote Sensor Assembly
Allows sensor to be separated
from transmitter for difficult to reach
installations.
Duct Mount tits
Provides an easy method to install
an Ultima Gas Monitor in a ventila-
tion duct.
Flow Cap
Used when an Ultima Sampling
Module or any other type of flow sys-
tem is providing the gas sample to
an Ultima Gas Monitor.
See Data Sheet 07 -2022 for all
Ultima Accessories.
Ordering Information
Ordering Sheet 0730 -00
Represented by:
�7
ISO
7RRa4`
Nola: This Dula shwf contains only a g4ncr21 dnc+prian of rho MSA Ultimo Gas Moniloring Snlem. White uses and pariarmonce
w3abil;41" ere described. under no 6-Gumssanc -3 mould the proaucr be used aeepl by qualirwd. Trained per- annel, and nal until
rho gin.- mJCbns, 106444 er ether ti,ualum aeeempany q +he oradua tip. 6~ mMN117 mad end uAckl"ood and 1110 precaurions
n,m;n :et Fork fallawed. only riser conrain fie comp1414 and awa0ed Intorma"Om mrcerninq 16is pfeducr. ,
In U.S, 1- 800- MSA -INST or FAX (412) 776 -3280
JL In Canare, da, 1 -800- 267 -0672 or FAX (416) 663 -5908
Elsewhe MSA International, (412) 967 -3228
or FAX (41
11967-3373
Instrument Division: P.O. Box 427, Pittsburgh, PA 15230 U.S.A.
www.MSAmet. cam
Dais shoat 07.201s 0 MSA 1997 Printed to U.SA. gTa%L)
JUL -20-99 11 :55AM FROWWATER RESOURCES
m,
T -65T P.06 /11 F-T34
M A
Toxg rd a
11
Gas Monitor
0On42 G
JUL -20 -90 11:56AM FROM-WATER RESOURCES
Toxganf*
11
Gas Monitor
t -/
Taxgard Monitors are
Used in a val of
indvetrioi or commardui
appiiccwons- The
Monitor is early to install
and operate. Just 9PP1Y
power to the Toward 11
Gas Monitor and it is
ropily to go or use it as a
transportable gas
mompor with its aptionoll
internal battery. The
combustible gas
Twm!xrd 11 Monitor
requires just a simple
correction fe its remote
sensor.
ti
0��1� i'
Applications
Twoord 11 Monitors can " applied 'n
any opp�on where there is o threat of
the build , of combugibie 005M. the
p�enw - rosic gases, or aeggen
defiGtriCy
Twgard tl Monitan are sub able for
;ndcor and outdoor aPpl'rcad0ns i"
'i"Ily any typo of indwrtry indud;nq
refineries, clteratiiaal and Petro- cherri'cai
fod4tlas, sled mili5, water and "M
wetter, mining. and aeneml industry
Standard Features
• large, four -digit LED display
•Three levels of alarm
• Large IX13 alarm indicators
• Intemal relay Contacts for FAULT,
CALMON. WARNING and ALARM• .
nt K115de fouh fetal► output -
• D,Qgnostics that appear on the
display
•Audible alarm
• 4 to 20 mA output
Advanced Features
The Wvgrced jeanures of the Tarpord
U Mannar provide berMfits rtener bafa"s
available in a gas manimr.
• Automatic calibration) gnat elirnimm
errors due To differences in
proeedruss.
v Calibration at predetermined
timeldcm with no manual
in onvenhm when used With Ullima
Auta-Col Module.
• pate of last a4cessiful aallbration
recorded within the Togard 11
Monitor.
•'Rapiace Sesser' indication whdn
sensor nears in end -of -Gtr.
• Real -time clock for time and dale
stamping of eventL
• Logging of m;nimum, maximum and
average gas cascsrmavians ovtr
prede+ermined firm kftwls-
• Selectable lock -out of autpcn signrals
during coUbrotion to inhib t alarms
and control actions.
• p-Igital. nwiti• drop Communication.
pesign
T -657 P.02/11 F -734
rsma+irig the plug -in wrisor. NI Twgard
tl Monitors are focta c l'.broted,
mvldng them ready far installation and
immediate aperoWn• The Tt�ard fl
Mmn�taer, unique design eliminates all
ward o rtersers, a any other type of
missal adiustenen+l-
AU Ta4ard 11 Gas selected for
regardless of the gas
deWtwn, arm housed in a rugged, metal
endes im d"Uned s fsw KPI � wth
the smig ar !mounted (aced by rim
enelosurs. ssrrsor using and Phi
unscruAr9 the
Operation
To -gard n Moridors "amok aperale
in The d- iifusion made, but also can be
spWoed with an internal PrumP in
appl'raotians where a ;s neoeswry or
more convenient to draw a sample iron
a remove 100469n.
All Tagard 11 assemblies air shipped
with a yn;que Sensa►perd which s
the sensor front din, water. eta ..hile
aflo.rrng gas to penera'w into tote unit.
The 5ensor9ard also ads as a Raffle in
Mindy enwronmems.
1KTh the remove sensor wr=ian.
sensors and 1►ansrnitros con be
separated for ins"llations Where, 000ras
In the seraor soy be d;l Mult-
outputs
All Taspard 11 Monirors Comte standard
with a harps 1.7SO = 4111k y for local
indication+ P gas readings or arty etFtcr
stared porametsr.
Addillaftally. relay cams is are
pmvWW for CAUTION. WARNING and '
ALARM IeYels. A ttartrwlly energtud Fault
may also a contact output for
any can an tho would not be
aons�dened NORMAL b>! the TQ%wd 11
Gas Monitor.
Nwngl*. airy Torgard 11 Gas
Monitor can he spocrfied with a digital
autp►et far ppnrreaian to MSA s PAW
2001 Digital Nowork SPOM fcw am
monjroring While o11 of the fnfornriaawn
roared in the T 11 t, w Mertitor can
be aaowsed l�for eia"As an the
leant pans) C&play. matt' dines it;s
dedmble to boo the capobft to view
this infcr an. getup poramessrs,
change alarm levels. em at a central
Women- The DAN 2001 DWW Nwwwk
drop communication, atoriurwn q*Vwrn
relays and many odmWl. (See Data Sheet
160Q-08 for mom inflOnF11136AM iMW out
mainall Hawwk %%mm.)
Calibration
Although the T=%*rd 11 Gos Mnnar
a
features ttwnendoAx s0 hlay. it is et>ten-
rial. os with all gas monitors, that if be
aawsrated Periodically wNs the ppa�ss of
interest" ensure proper ope►odo++-
The Tagard 11 Mwjw mduoas the
powiluffily of human error when PwIlor^�
iris a calibradon• Sim pph ate the coG-
brovion made and foUaw 00 instructwos
an be wren to qppd mom 4 The
JUL -20 -96 11:56AM FROM -MATER RESOURCES + T -657 P.10 /11 F -T34
s ! =s• &mply sElac the gas ?a pe
montTCrrti.
:4 mar roc = =cr- VAJ& baltom
f:taun) is the rypicc; seiea ;an, a aide
rrounT 0-1don ;s a.adal-Ic F4MC.larly'i
frig Tosgard Il Manor ..,A be ut+ed as
a Transportable Rol mon;lor- The
Mon,lar can then be allow+d To s.t on
any flat surfact d..ring
3peration.
Aueibler AN units coma
standard —ilh a 70 db xona- Tlcrf. A
93 db Federal horn or 95 db 20MAc@
harp rich seltttCfobla outFvr Tenet con
be - didcled as an alternate
-
ir^caa- up To ttno 111 top- tno%ont■d
straits can be s4scred to to acli.alad
irortt Ate warning and MOM 1e.els-
daoar4 provides power in
the ergrd inpdf �?awcr to the unit
boCamct intelrt:ptcd. NA allows rcr
transportable- operation of the unit.
:;qi -A Caruri.wni1cw iar.- Allow:
Toepard It Mon;tar to operate- an the
OAN 20n dig;tal neT.ork. Al mfnr-
Minion ;nclud4nq am .slues. slarCd
;i►manan- and -f -up pargntetera
Q Then oe displayed or controlled at
a ccntrol location. Far more infcrTna-
lioa an the DAN 7001 system see
pate Sheet 160038.
, ;.-I: sr-cl ?,::r.:. for oppliwaons
.here it is necessary io draw a sample
ro the unit.
■ �ir.:;7e ZZ��� =!ati Maws the
Toagard It �rpl to maniTor bnrothing air
lines ppically for lew l"s of carbon
n.ottax;de.
a }Ip..,r czc- Used whr na.er a naTt-
pressunmd ads sample ;c to be daliw
creel to the aenaor.
a Acr..zly- For easy caRtnny ei the unit
when Mind a3 a WC(IS noble maniUDr-
0 'Cr! gc+e (not snownl - if it 13 neces-
sary to lade lho inCJQWe during oper-
adon for sawArt Purpaaa.
JUL -20 -96 11:58AM1 FROM-WATER RESOURCES
Toxclard Il
GasUanitor
Specifications
rim wi leis, dNYe'r, ios(c+
Z6• io -rso'c
io"
T w R` -4• to +1227 i
mm - ,� 9o•C
-40 a 1194 F
s
T" pt �q c 12 sec. MF6 6 asc.l
r,S%lyr., typically
Soon prig;
�, I awfr.. *Pwa&
"our.
Low than IS FS
7 SEC
=11i PS or 2 prom
�soe.riry.
C.an, Vie: lit; Col
s10% FS or 2 PPM
(otl•rS1
s
T" pt �q c 12 sec. MF6 6 asc.l
TW O= and 10x00
12 34 s� (jyp. teal
T40 C&nbl alas
c
Catnb.tsfite.
7 SEC
mueddhip
0.95% Ali. rim- mndtsaw9
� von y
l zhu
v� mwW' 1 tmu
CWWO ftrp a XP Aar
rmwr4 y on bo Ireta11e4 in C!a s 1. Div I
Orem
P~ Inpub
110 -220 VAC P -W i^Plfi
��� rifle Vwins Santa Scum
sea 6upem 160048
Irdetrnol MlaPsr tam+
Faak. CwAiorb M►erawr9.
bomW &.lei>It C•rsW Mdntr•
5 amp ® 125 we: s Snip a 90 VAC
"M }T+ I.od acid
ms-
eatMr>< * irneM alarm , t,r.
TadCr. end as: up 1P 24
wi up
a olam,am ft
fill opriers; d.p.ndig n
5 2 h�sablas Q . r.
"Goells.
A Aridow el 10"w s l s:"ri s s'li
wow," � 13Ibs.
0
IJQ�JC7:i
Taatgard II Monitor a~aricolly makm
any Masasary adiustmefm. Thae's no
,,,� the Tooagard 11 Gas
Monitor. The acival gas readout is dts.
Played during ea6bration-
11VIten calibration is wmplere. the
Too,gard M1 manimr aummahcally "alarm
to normal oparatian.
Far convenient record keeping. the
Ts„ =War 1 ce�'r1 nnil i �we stumps the Igs1
W,th use of the apponal Awta -Cal
Module calibrarian os can even be per -
manenijy connected..ihe oo6bnstion
r� place ae
mntema dim atm9 ny ml
in/arvenlion-
An itatemal tvva- button Wypad allows
aecaSS 10 aU set-ap parameters and
stored rapes including inWari n Of eAli-
bration. In odditian, two tlrp
communication da !ires ore awilabte for
the Tanartd 11 Manimr_ The To-4rd 11
Calibn tar and Cont►ollor both proon44 a
dippitoly.�d nru
ed knol for naarsi"
ccGbroian and acres to the advanced
fee mm. This paw"d Jahn+q�+a eliRlr
notes to& as WWI as th+ r�+ttd to open
the ondawre during set up or colibro-
tian.
Calibrator
The Toagerd II CclibsMr Qf �, *"
indsitlt's simplest method of
p is on eosy�to -use; threr>~ dovin
that albws calibration of to TaaWni u
Manilas: The Tesgord 11 "ibrator is
available far noose who do not need to
access the Toaogard 11 Madders advanced
feruures.
Controller
rw Tasgard 11 Controller PfOvidw
*g" ,ewe keypad - ures through
The wradler is used W.
• Set the #=I- time dads
Represented bv-
MW.res .90. .
M i.IM�M.i ��•�rriMr�e!oeM�M�iI
In U.S,1.4gq.NGA-WST or PM 41716 -3=
In Gaatod4. 1. 800- 3f7 -1i672 or 1FAS l 5900
�61wwMA. �� � fo fAX
kslp .wo division: P.O. pas 427. Rnburgh, PA 15230 U.SA
vww.M5Anet- eon
T -657 P.11 /11 F -734
• Set alarm levels
• Change "n-Vas vok*s
• pivplal - data of last ealibr des"
• Display -16wintulr, rrteptinaum and
agape lam valwet►
• Change address
• 5a faslure calibration lim*Vate
in addition ra pmvidins basic
calibration fu"etions- It is eomplo*
password- proheted.
Optional Modules
Pro +ides a moors to p 1r
imnavo calibration and sera Cos- The
Tmeard a Maribor then can be
pmeromrmed 1a corwan itself w pre-
determined tints and dose.
Accessories
gentata *now Asumd P
Alluom Sensor to be separated from
transafolur for d'� mm4oicafi
installations.
Ordering
information
OnUrWe Shit
m Tcmard 11 Manlror's at• tnonufoe wNd
using MWs uni4ue AssomMG-To -Order
IATO) pros M. This Guam liar 10 select
OV of ttw 1'istad o0am in artier 10
ene"your Tahgard It NwW ar W1111les
yaur irWwidual reCluitstttemte- ATO
Tmgord 11 Monitors ale namm* OT d
the same dory the order is M=lved. Tro
ezpladed vine' shown on the pnsvious
page rrwlres the Pgodion PF=m a
simple procedum
1c;
Ji
—jim- I Con MW OW III
pro W"orm"s o rd. aael t+r+to n usw wo4a
A F�A_
t
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DATE: August 18,1998
CITY COUNCIL MEETING Boards and Commissions
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
AGENDA HEADING:
CHMS Park Vista Management Operating Agreement Extension
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
The El Segundo Senior Housing Board unanimously recommends extending the Park Vista Management
Agreement with Community Housing Management Services for the next two years. Extension beginning
January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2000.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Approve the proposed addendum to the Management Operating Agreement through December
31, 2000.
2. Approve extending CHMS's contract to manage Park Vista through December 31, 2000 with
proposed revisions in their submitted 1998 budget.
3. Direct Senior Housing Board and staff if addendum or contract is not extended.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
If the El Segundo Senior Housing Board is to go to bid for the management of Park Vista it will require the
execution of an RFP immediately. This year the Board is heavily involved in the execution of the Major
Maintenance program at Park Vista, leaving little time necessary to oversee the RFP process for the
management of the facility. Secondly, with CHMS as the current management company they too are heavily
involved in the maintenance projects and serve on the maintenance sub - committee. To change the
management company now would be extremely complicate and a possible detriment to the maintenance
program. In light of this and CHMS's exceptional cooperation and management of Park Vista for the past four
years, the Board voted unanimously to extend their contract for another two years.
CHMS proposed to extend the current management services at Park Vista for an additional $100 per month
for calender year 1999. This would set their management fee at $2,400 per month. For the year 2000,
CHMS proposes $100 additional per month, bringing the fee for that year to $2,500 a month.
is providing services on their second
extension of the original contract granted in 1994.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENT:
The third addendum to the Management Operating Agreement.
CHMS Proposal for Property Management Services though 2000
FISCAL IMPACT: YES X_ NO
Amount Requested: $1,200 annually
Account Balance: Date: FY98 /00 Budget
Account Number
Appropriation Required: Yes No
ORIGINATED: Date: August 18, 1998
Peter Freeman, President
El Segundo Senior Housing Board
ACTION TAKEN:
a:chffmxt2.wpd
00030 D-4
olilanunit
C_
Housing Management Services
July 22, 1998
Board of Directors
El Segundo Senior Citizens Housing Corporation
Park Vista Seniors Apartments
Subject: Park Vista: Proposal for Property Management Services
I
Dear Board of Directors:
-Community Housing Management Services appreciates the opportunity of serving the Board of
Directors, the residents of Park Vista Apartments and the City of El Segundo. We hope to
continue this relationship. We are a non -profit housing management company, dedicated to
serving low income seniors, families and people with disabilities. This is a proposal to extend the
current management services at Park Vista for one and two year options at Park Vista.
CHMS proposes to extend the current management services at Park Vista for a consideration of
$100 additional per month during the calendar year 1999. This would set the management fee at
$2,400 per month, The following calendar year, 2000, CHMS proposes $100 additional per
month, bring the fee for the year 2000 to $2,500 per month.
Again, we appreciate the opportunity to provide services in support of Park Vista Seniors
Apartment. We believe that we can do an excellent job for you in managing the subject property
and we look forward to your response to this proposal.
Sincerely yours,
=Mercr "'I'e Aul�
George
Executive Director
3375 South Hoover Street # D, Los Angeles, CA 90007
(213) 765 -9612, Fax (213) 765 -9623
000"'r
® / ` EQUAL
�u_ r HOUO SING
OPPORTUNITY
A NON - PROFIT COMPANY
THIRD ADDENDUM TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
The El Segundo Senior Citizen Housing Corporation (hereinafter "Park Vista ") and
Community Housing Management Services (hereinafter "CHMS ", collectively the Parties ")
hereby amend the Management Agreement entered into by the parties on May 6, 1986 (the
"Agreement ") as follows:
Section 1.3 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
1.3 TERM. This Agreement shall expire on December 31, 2000, subject to the provisions set forth
in Section 19.1 Section 19 'Termination' infra.'
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement and any written addenda and /or amendments
thereto shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
EL SEGUNDO SENIOR CITIZENS
HOUSING CORPORATIONS a.k.a.
PARK VISTA
By:
Peter Freeman, President
Date:
00032
COMMUNITY HOUSING MANAGEMENT
SERVICES
By:
George A. Mercer, Exec. Director
Date:
TO THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
MEETING DATE: August 18,1998
AGENDA HEADING: COMMITTEES
Agenda Description: Schedule Interviews of candidates for Community Cable Advisory Committee and
Recreation & Parks Commission ( "CCBs "), with filing deadline set for 48 hours prior to interviews.
Recommended Council action: Set date of interviews for approximately 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, September 1, 1998.
Introduction and Background: City Council opened the recruitment of candidates for Community Cable
Advisory Committee on July 7, 1998, with date of interviews scheduled for August 4, 1998. Due to time
constraints, only interviews for candidates to the Planning Commission were held on August 4th. The opening on
the Recreation & Parks Commission is as a result of the resignation of Michael Kretzmer who was appointed to
the Planning Commission on August 4th.
Discussion: The City is currently recruiting to fill the following vacancies on the City's committees, commissions
and boards.
Commissions Committees & Boards # & expiration of Vacancies / Applications Received to date
Community Cable Advisory Committee 1 position exp 10/31/98 one
Recreation & Parks Commission 1 position exp 06/30102 one
The vacancies are being advertised in the Community Calendar section of the El Segundo Herald, on Community
Cable T.V. Bulletin Board, and on the City's Water bills.
Attached Supporting Documents And Who Prepared Them:
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Originator': Date: August 11, 1998
Julia Abreu Mason, Council Assistant
Date: August 11, 1998
Reviewed by:
nAeWsetintrw.998
uo1,-i_3
D -5
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCILMEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Reports
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Appropriate $350,000 and approve the LAX Intervention Project for $1,225,000 as discussed by
City Council July 21, 1998.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Appropriate the transfer of funds to the LAX Intervention budget.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
In response to a growing concern that the proposed LAX Master Plan alternatives may have a
detrimental effect on the quality of life in El Segundo, the City Council launched the LAX Master
Plan Intervention project in 1997. As a result, the FY 1997 -98 Budget included an initial
appropriation of $400,000 and a mid -year adjustment of $350,000 to retain the necessary legal and
strategic planning services. Given the increasing degree of project complexity and growing number
of issues, the City Council budgeted an additional $475,000 in the FY 1998 -99 budget, but only
allocated $125,000 at that time. At the July 21, 1998 City Council meeting, the entire project was
discussed including the $1,225,000 budget. The funds required to fully fund the project total
$350,000.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council LAX Master Plan Intervention Subcommittee has reviewed the budget and has
recommended appropriating the full amount in anticipation of planned expenditures during FY
1998 -99 For reference purposes, Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger have been retained to provide the
necessary legal services for the project. The firm has in turn retained Gladstein & Associates to
address critical policy and communication strategies.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACT: $350,00
Operating Budget: $750,000 in 97 -98: $1.25,000 in 98 -99
Capital Improvement Budget: N/A
Amount Requested: $875,000
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance: Date:
Account Number: 2901 -6406
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required: Yes: $350,000 from General Fund undesianated
��vATED : , Date:
�` _ .. _.. - • - - - _ �Z /yam
BY: Date:
TAKEN:
0 00 213 4 D'`
� I
I
N
N N I
I
I N
I
I ;
N
a
I
I,
11
N I1'
N N
c*i
W W
I
Y III II �
�I
N N
< <
� I
r-
0. O
SON
N i
Ul
U
dc
7
IL. \
C I
IC
• I
} W
J
> 10. g
gIIO C i •IiA V
V O
O
¢
>
O
a
Cl-
¢
' I
LL
O'
cc
O
MI
I
I
I
O o.T O !f ^ !M U1
'Ma
I
O
^
MM iO O MIIO IAIf
(FU .O N I
I
cu
o ^oo�aDloF1.11o.0oM!MO I
I I
''
F
D
NIA M N M
.a I N M
iN
*! M M L-MMj
O!m
M. 10
I
O
I
II
2.
D N
I
?
0
I p
i
W K
•
N ~
O
N
T c
W
I++ W
10
„~,� I V
LL Z�
O ¢
O
N
W.
Q Wi',�
2 LL
h
qI
...+
A
U
N �
A U
>
p z
W LU 0
t
•
Z;W W
.�
►• D!93 O
C
V M A 01
C
c
,
< ZLL Z MII 1
'O
O
U i
2G'ZO02
H VnOi h' W >5>
!•Ow
C
c "
orLLU�o< Zcuoc,LLLL
c o
u
zC ='Z�uWil�r-
j WLLatWNUf
%.�
G L
LL0:jxlu
X W F•'J N Z,2 O t 111
u
•,r.•.
W •<
A A
r
ZF
A LL O L'J O'W W
MM
J04WO50=4 -J"
W ZZ
U O
u
W. WUr .a•. N!-CC
WI -OWL0. ►+W61YW W
G p
q • U
s
W f- LnN O wr+ OFC<�••� O x
2 L U= J= W W+
c O
,UL 'U
ul
O to C K On.
V
U V
ti CE
+.
NAM •
W'A 4
q v ,A
m ¢
M. '.0
^'
1 7
�O N
O�O o o
O O O O,^ •- ^'^ ^ M'Ln .4 .04- F
.- ^ ^_
ZI
<'
Z NIA •
a: Z'
4I r
T I•
I�
N
O ^ .. ^
aI
o
<JI
if IA
V
LL M
F�
�. O N
M {. q
•W
1 ..
W�^
�1'
ter'
..•O Id•
<�
Z
WT
S
(. W
2D
It z
<W
z
i
KOI
U� 1L IO
IIw
L
"_"
+I!
H OI
0 ILL V IOU
3G
I
� I
I
N
N N I
I
I N
I
I ;
N
a
I
N I1'
N N
I
Y III II �
�I
N N
� I
SON
N i
dc
IL. \
C I
IC
• I
} W
W
> 10. g
gIIO C i •IiA V
V O
O
w
iV
Iq
I�
I�
O
YILL
1
i< m
LbJ
x c1 A
,11
- E -7
7—
b 0+
b \
W e N
an
o• \
W
0
W W W
.-
IS h
«
I.- 0. a
Vi
M
u
a
J
O
C
CL
IL
It
LL
O
W
a
0
F
O�
ti
M
M
Nom - M0oov0
••, o•00 ::� T OO LA LA
F'o - oIN LA 0, LA CD M
CU M W 7:F 0 LA 0% M F,
a SO N N VILA LA M.N LA
Z -M + +N +N M
D W F M LA
LL F 'M M N
N M N
O Y
O m '
O
� � C
W < 3'
PRINTED IN U.S.A. 6
-coo
a
N
I
La �
} N
<
W
u
z
N
O
4
V
L
C
=
O
W
9.
c
•+
Q t v +•
h
1w
LL z
W
--
\ L
O.
4 3 C 2 Y A
•+
O Q
0 4, tl V r 7
u
O
0:
a W
4 Y-
++
4
u N
V
IN 3 r 6-4 «
L
} K
'Z W
C
Y✓
t 0 C V —
O
,., 3
LL
4 >.
.+
L
O C
Y L 4 L r 3 L
O
u
C
-+ «
-+
O
L 4
Y
i Y U 4 N O 4
c
fA W
; -
L
4.
' Y O> N
4
W IL
u
>
r
E N
Y
w 4 T N Y'10 C
L
�•+ W O
>
4
7
Y 4
tt
L C r C U Y Y
LII Y
h u J D:
4 4
4
I •�
7 A r N O C C c •
✓ O
z W W
t
Y
C �+
N
m= Y« U 4 •-� 3 tl
C 4,
> Q> S
N✓
L
-+
O O.
Y
N
N a c ✓ 4 Y
O C
h = 0 0
w
U
7
4
U
C« +, E 4 C,d O O
Y L.
U O In
N O
O
C
�+ N
L
4
h M ••• O 9.
t
¢ Z 2 1 1
Y
C
7
�+
V
L
Y U Y a
>-
h 7 ..
L 4
4
O
4-
u
tl u L> Y Y a
3 r
z0z LL \aa
3 U
u
N
r
• Y- 3 L WaV 4
G••+
OZ< WzZ
r -•
N
L-+ N
C
N
0 >a 4 « •--
NU
-. 3 C h W» 7
w
O
A
0 4 0
4
E N L C O L
hLLU,Z
C
r
q- -Z O
L
-+
Y Y -+ Y 4> V
O Y
< W Z Z W
zzw
c 0
C O
4
-+
L •w
L
�-
W !� N Y 4 E U r1 O
L
W W Y L O <1A h h
V
E
u
N o r
•
4
d L 04 4 4
Y r
O:O:u WLL O:WNN
aN
Y
ac ✓ 4
3�
C
'r !� >-Vtl Y C
N
U70> > C O 7
x
O
L
U 4 L
4
4
-+� « V O Ord 4
4 >-
W hJ O}14 - CE Ix
4 V
O
Y E Y
A>
m
L Y•-� N� Oc L
YA
a DC .+M M ZLLhh
u
Y
►
L a
u O
4 >-- C a4 3 c
-+
z W • IL «+ ►+ _
.+ C
L
u L. 0
C L
Y
W 0- V E 0 4 r
Y 9
DaLL JLJ W
A
r
10
O
Y a
4
L aY- U U
Y Y
}OW
U. W CC W - + uJJ
3 C
••-
V4- r
Oa
>
'a 06 7 x 4 N
>
�• O> h H m m
r •-�
►•
V
4 r
L<
O
Y a 4 r 3 •-� in
a- 0
Y1
J< LL W J ►+ i/i <<
U LL
O
L
r N •-�
-+
r 4 L U ✓'.'U V
•+ L
s
<-+ aQ J¢aa
4
4 rU
a
4 O-+ 4 U -� Y
L a
L)
cz U h h 0: -+. W Z z
'�-
>-
N
L C
S. •�
E
L tl 4• 4 L 4 r r t
4 a
WOW = -+WmYW W
co
u o
Y
4 Vw
u u
W
'Yr
W4
z to (A L D. h< C[ o. 0.
O
4 V
U
C E O
G c
C C tl 4 C✓ Y 4
i
W U) V) O Q < - 0 x X
L
L L
4
4 >-
Y 3
C
Y 4 ✓1 L O C a C✓
C N
rn
UD <<u u3-1 3 W W
C O
3 4
L
O4 r
OO
C
OE C« u o s-Y 4
Y r
W}
w
Or
UL
U
0. 1.
LU
4
4., G.
«C
U
U r
0
L O
Y
L N E V a r
✓ Y
o L
W 4 L
✓
4
r U a
W✓
r -•+ 4 i-'9 C r C N
L v
N L
W
Q J E -�
Y G
••+
3 C 3
O
3 9 a O C 4 a Y Y
3 N
W
I D
�tnO�-- -�NMNM -
- +W LO
L 4
3
a4 tl
L
a4 -� 7 L i E N
10 3
U
C`In
000� 0000002
Zw O
r E
0
E O
••
�-
E ••.aw L O r-+
C —
Z
M M -4 to F F<
w Z w 4
i.
V
O L c
C
4
O L N E Y 3 L 4 L
4 9
<
F OC
w
0< C c
O 4
w
U 3—
O
L
U 0 4 4 L U. a a 4
14
Z
cu In
do
COJ
of O
4
11
U
II
M
A
C
CO LL P
i w ..
J
<
u
LL
L
> 4
O N
r-
W
LL. O
O
L 4
aY
r
O
H u
O
-+'a
< z Q W
-
W h
L 3
Q 4
h
m
:LL
u
•• j
tr< z
•
h Z
Y%-
L
W
W
'W
zL - --+
w
<3
u
L
0
L
I
Q W LL h
•
h 0
•-
o 0
O
O
w
1<
30
1 r1 `� (
N u
-+ O
U. r
u
Ix
Y LL
<
'� 01
S
0
: a
1.._
UU�:�J J
City of El Segundo
PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER
07/28/98 THROUGH 08/11/98
Date Payee
07/28 Federal Reserve Bank
08/05 Healthcomp
08/10 IRS
08/10 Emp. Dev. Dept.
08/10 Wells Fargo
08/10 W.B.M.W.D.
DATE OF RATIFICATION: 08/18/98
TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE:
Amount
200.00
905.92
164,782.37
32,768.06
30,000.00
838,066.80
Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by :
City Treasurer /
Finance Director
Description
Employee Bond Purchase P/R #2
Weekly eligible claims week ending 08/04/98
Federal Payroll Taxes P/R #3
State Paroll Taxes P/R #3
Fund Transfer for Worker's Comp.
Water Payment for June
Date
Date
City Manager Date�l�/�1
1,066,723.15
Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo.
MINUTES OF THE
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 4, 1998 - 5:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Gordon at 5:05 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Kelly McDowell.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Gordon -
Present
Mayor ProTem Jacobs -
Present
Councilmember Wernick -
Absent
Councilmember Gaines -
Present
Councilmember McDowell -
Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total.) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and
employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a
misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. NONE
CLOSED SESSION: The City Council moved into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including
the Brown Act (Government Code §54950, et M.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real
Property Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or
discussing matters covered under Gov't Code §54957 (Personnel); and /or conferring with the City's Labor
Negotiators as follows:
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov't Code §54956.9(a)) -
In the Matter of the Application of City of Los Angeles, OAH No. L- 9604014
Hill v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 030986
Hughes v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. BC 185210
Senior v. City of El Segundo, WCAB Unassigned
Mosleh & Greffon v. City of El Segundo, LASC Case No. YC 025903
Fenwick v. Civil Service Commission & City of El Segundo, 2 Civil B121282 & Los Angeles No. BSO44667.
El Segundo v. Kilroy, LASC Case No. YC 031166
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(b): -1- potential case (no further public
statement is required at this time); Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov't Code §54956.9(c): -5- matters.
DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL MATTERS (Gov't Code §54957) - Status of City Manager recruitment.
CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LABOR NEGOTIATOR - (Gov't Code §54957.6) - Meet with negotiator
for the General Employees Association (El Segundo City Employees Association) and negotiator for the
unrepresented employees. E-8
3
-I-
Minutes
City Council Adjourned Meeting
August 4, 1998 - 5:00 P.M.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) - None.
REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION - None.
6:00 p.m. Council opened session for the purpose of interviewing candidates.
SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS -
1. Interview candidates for Planning Commission and Community Cable Advisory Committee.
It was the consensus of the City Council to appoint Michael Kretzmer to the Planning Commission to
a term expiring June 30, 2002, and to extend the application period for Community Cable Advisory
Committee, scheduling interviews for September 1, 1998 at 5:00 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit) Individuals who have received
value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify
themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. None.
ADJOURNMENT at 6:55 p.m.
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
Minutes
City Council Adjourned Meeting
0 0 1 3 �) -2- August 4, 1998 - 5:00 p.m.
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 4, 1998 - 7:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Gordon at 7:00 P.M.
INVOCATION - Rev. Alexei Smith, Saint Andrew Russian Greek Catholic Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Kelly McDowell
PRESENTATIONS -
1. Councilmember Gaines presented commendations recognizing Teen Center's REACT (Recreation
Event & Activity Committee for Teens) 1998 Scholarship winners, Derek Ernest, who will attend
Harbor College, Jessica Hancock, who will attend Cuesta College in San Luis Obispo, and Tiffany
Corallo, who will attend UC Davis.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Gordon -
Present
Mayor ProTem Jacobs -
Present
Councilmember Wernick -
Absent
Councilmember Gaines -
Present
Councilmember McDowell -
Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business Only - 5 minute limit per person, 30
minute limit total) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and
employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be
a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. Five (5) individuals addressed Council.
1. In response to Mr. Frank Wong, resident's requests, Mayor Gordon advised that the FAA has not
provided the City with question and answer forms; and Interim City Manager, Tim Grimmond,
explained the noise complaint form, giving examples of complaints received.
2. Chad Ceretto, 210 W. Acacia, requested to speak on Consent Item No. 9 and urged Council to vote
in favor of the project, questioning who would pay the schools' portion of $3,000.
3. Steve Schevlin, El Segundo High School teacher and coach, spoke in support of Consent Item No.
9, felt the parking lot could be used for car washes, and advised of the schools' costs.
0 00 40
Minutes
City Council Regular Meeting
August 4, 1998
Page 1
4. Joan Trimble, resident, suggested banning certain vehicles from parking on residential streets,
requesting feedback on her suggestions regarding limiting parking to one side of street, and
extending the red zone on each corner.
5. Terry O'Brian, resident, suggested that the School District may wish to rent its lot on Imperial
Highway to residents with large vehicles.
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS.
1. Consideration of a motion to read all ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only.
MOVED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell to read all
ordinances and resolutions on this Agenda by title only. MOTION PASSED BY UNANANIMOUS
VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent.
B. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS.
1. Public hearing and authorization for the City Manager, or his /her designee, to commence with
the sale of the City owned property located at 160 South Sepulveda Boulevard.
Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a public hearing and authorization
for the City Manager, or his /her designee, to commence with the sale of the City -owned property
located at 160 South Sepulveda Boulevard. He asked if proper notice had been given and if any
written communications had been received. Clerk Mortesen, stated that public notice had been given
in a timely manner and no written communications had been received by the Clerk's office.
Jim Hansen, Economic Development Director, gave a brief staff report.
No individuals addressed Council and the public hearing was closed.
City Attorney Mark Hensley read the following:
RESOLUTION NO. 4079
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA DECLARING REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 160 SOUTH
SEPULVEDA, EL SEGUNDO TO BE SURPLUS PROPERTY AND ORDERING ITS
SALE.
MOVED by Mayor Pro Tern Jacobs SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell to adopt
Resolution No. 4079, declaring real property located at 160 South Sepulveda, El Segundo to be
surplus property and order its sale. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0.
Councilmember Wernick was absent.
X004 t-
Minutes
City Council Regular Meeting
August 4, 1998
Page 2
2. Public Hearing and a Resolution of the City of El Segundo, California, finding the City to be in
conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) and adopting the CMP Local
Implementation Report, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65089.
Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a public hearing and adoption of a
Resolution of the City of El Segundo, finding the City to be in conformance with the Congestion
Management Program (CMP) and adoption of the CMP Local Implementation Report, in accordance
with California Government Code, Section 65089. He asked if proper notice had been given, and
if any written communications had been received. Clerk Mortesen, stated that public notice had been
given in a timely manner and no written communications had been received by the Clerk' s office.
Bellur Devaraj, Engineer, gave a brief staff report.
No individuals addressed Council and the public hearing was closed.
City Attorney Mark Hensley read the following:
RESOLUTION NO. 4080
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP), AND ADOPTING THE CMP
LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION CODE SECTION 65089.
MOVED by Councilmember McDowell, SECONDED by Councilmember Gaines, to adopt
Resolution No. 4080, finding the City to be in conformance with the Congestion Management
Program and adopting the CMP Local Implementation Code Section 65089. MOTION PASSED
BY UNANANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent.
3. Public Hearing concerning City of El Segundo Energy Services Performance Contracting Program
and award of contract to Landis & Staefa, Inc. (contract amount = $1,641,452).
Mayor Gordon stated this is the time and place hereto fixed for a public hearing concerning City
of El Segundo Energy Services Performance Contracting Program and award of contract to Landis
& Staefa, Inc. (contract amount = $1,641,452). He asked if proper notice had been given and if
any written communications had been received. Clerk Mortesen, stated that public notice had been
given in a timely manner and no written communications had been received by the Clerk's office.
Ed Schroder, Director of Public Works, gave a brief staff report.
No individuals addressed Council, and the public hearing was closed.
It was the consensus of the Council to select Alternative No. 1, in a contract amount to $2,171,979.
Minutes
City Council Regular Meeting
August 4, 1998
Page 3
ii0r'c�Ll
MOVED by Councilmember McDowell SECONDED by Councilmember Gaines to award
Contract No. 2615 to Landis & Staefa, Inc., Alternative No. 1, for an Energy Services Performance
Contracting Program (contract amount = $2,171,979), with further review of financing in
approximately two years. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0.
Councilmember Wernick was absent.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS -
1. Staff recommendation to provide staffing to fill the function of centralized procurement within the
Finance Department in the amount estimated at $28,544 for the 1998 -99 Budget. (Annual fiscal
impact of $106,140 which is expected to be offset by cost savings and reduced use of legal
services
Gavin Curran, Assistant Finance Director, gave a brief staff report.
City Attorney Mark Hensley read the following:
RESOLUTION NO. 4081
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SALARY RANGE FOR THE JOB
CLASSIFICATION OF PURCHASING AGENT.
MOVED by Councilmember Gaines, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs to direct the Human
Resources Department to implement the class specification and retain the position of Purchasing
Agent within the Business Services Division of the Finance Department. This action will result in
an increase of one person in the Finance Department and a budget impact of $28,544 for the 1998-
99 fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, and adopt Resolution No. 4081. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent.
2. Staff recommends that City Council modify their previous 1998 -99 budget action which authorized
an increase of one position within the City Clerk I s office, and adjust the overall staff level by a net
reduction of one part -time (.5) position for a cost savings of $16,368 during the next fiscal year.
MOVED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell, to modify,
approve, and authorize Human Resources to retain the services of one full -time Office Specialist
assigned to the City Clerk, s Office for the primary purpose of contract management. MOTION
PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent.
It was the consensus of Council to review the question of extending this position to full -time at a
later date.
Minutes
City Council Regular Meeting
August 4, 1998
Page 4
u V 4
1
►01
REPORTS OF COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS -
Appointments made by the City Council on Tuesday, August 4, 1998 to Committees, Commissions
and Boards.
It was the consensus of Council to appoint Michael Kretzmer to the Planning Commission to a term
expiring June 30, 2002, and to extend the application period for Community Cable Advisory
Committee, scheduling interviews for 5:00 p.m., September 1, 1998.
It was the consensus of Council to appoint the following members to the Senior Task Force for a
period of sixty days commencing after Labor Day:
Nick Gerenday
Barbara Kessener
Mona Wenzel
Jack Trystman
Donnal McCarthy
Helen Blanchard
Carlota Guy
Shirley Koppelman- Gillig
Doris Ottman
Loretta Frye
It was the consensus of Council to appoint the following members for the Business License Task
Force for a period of sixty days commencing after Labor Day:
Peter Zimmerman
Gary Horowitz
Frank Godoy
Ken Schofield
Ron Fernari
Sandra Jacobs
Ed Munoz
William T. Mason
Carl Jacobson
Darryl Heath
William Bue
Tim Grimmond
Richard Lundquist
Ed Sakurai
Bob Mercer
Stan Sakauye
John G. Gaines
Finance Director
Revised budget and operational format for the Lakes at El Segundo Restaurant.
Jim Fauk, Director of Recreation and Parks, gave a brief staff report.
MOVED by Councilmember Gaines, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs to approve the
revised budget and operational format for the Lakes at El Segundo Restaurant. MOTION PASSED
BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed are to be adopted by one motion without discussion and passed unanimously. If a
call for discussion of an item is made, the item(s) will be considered individually under the next
heading of business.
Minutes
City Council Regular Meeting
August 4, 1998
Page 5
1. Warrant Nos. 249072 - 249339 on Demand Register Summary No. 02 in total amount of
$1,663,214.97, Warrant Nos. 249343 - 249425 on Demand Register Summary No. 30 in total
amount of $153,074.12, and Wire Transfers in the amount of $552,634.03.
2. City Council meeting Minutes of July 21, 1998.
3. Agreement No. 2616 providing for three year Memorandum of Understanding between the City
Council and the El Segundo City Employees Association and Resolution No. 4082. Fiscal Impact:
$272,305 first year total compensation cost. Funds are available in the City, s 1998/99 Fiscal Year
Operating Budget for the first year 5 % salary increase.
4. Proposed revisions to the class specification for the mid - management job classification of Deputy
City Clerk.
5. Examination plans for designated Personnel Merit System Job Classifications.
6. Proposed class specification and Resolution No. 4083, establishing a monthly salary range for the
new job classification of Senior Accountant. Fiscal Impact: Funding for the one position job
classification is contained in the Fiscal Year 1998 -99 Operating Budget.
7. Resolution No. 4084 of the City Council, rescinding Resolution Number 3996, and adopting a new
resolution approving a new Conflict of Interest Code.
: 11 101440_03f 81006ZK93►10 M [o : • K910014110810u 11.191 No
9. PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GAINES.
10. Award of Contract No. 2617 to Damon Construction Company, for the construction of sidewalks
north of the Douglas Street Green Line Station (contract amount $239,300), and retain Hayer
Consultants to provide construction inspection services at $38 /hour for a not to exceed amount of
$20,000.00, Contract No. 2618.
Recommendation -
1) Reject apparent low bid by Lobana Engineering as being non - responsive.
2) Award contract to qualified low bidder, Damon Construction Company, in the amount
of $239,300.00.
3) Authorize Mayor to execute standard public works construction agreement after
approval as to form by City Attorney.
4) Authorize staff to retain Hayer Consultants to provide construction inspection services
at $38 /hour for a "not to exceed" amount of $20,000.00.
5) Allocate $13,000.00 to project from the City's Transportation Development Act (TDA)
apportionment.
�0 -5 4
Minutes
City Council Regular Meeting
August 4, 1998
Page 6
11. ITEM PULLED DUE TO CONFLICT BY MAYOR GORDON.
12. Disposal of surplus vehicles and equipment.
Declare vehicles and equipment surplus and authorize staff to have items sold at auction, or sell for
scrap, as recommended. In addition, requesting permission from City Council to allow General
Services Manager and Business Services Manager to properly dispose of any items with no salvage
value (i.e., broken chairs, etc.) when deemed necessary. Staff will destroy those unsalvageable
items to prevent any unnecessary liability to the City.
13. PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR GORDON.
14. Approval of Service Agreement No. 2619 with the City of Redondo Beach /South Bay Youth
Project, to provide counseling services to El Segundo youth and families between September 8,
1998 and June 30, 1999 at a cost of $27,498.
MOVED by Councilmember Gaines SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell to approve
consent agenda items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12, and 14. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent.
CALL ITEMS FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA.
8. Adoption of plans and specifications for construction of a storm drain in the 500 block of
Washington Street - Project No. PW 98 -4 (estimated cost = $150,000.00).
MOVED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell, to adopt plans
and specifications for construction of a storm drain in the 500 block of Washington Street - Project
No. PW 98 -4 (estimated cost = $150,000.00) MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING
VOICE VOTE. AYES: MAYOR GORDON, MAYOR PROTEM JACOBS; ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBER WERNICK; NOES: NONE; NOT - PARTICIPATING:
COUNCILMEMBERS GAINES AND MCDOWELL. 3/0/2.
City Attorney, Mark Henson, advised Council consideration of this could be deferred until a full
Council was present.
Mayor ProTem Jacobs and Councilmember McDowell withdrew their motion, and this item was
continued to the City Council meeting of August 28, 1998.
9. Award of Contract No. 2620 to Century Paving, Inc. for improvements to the City parking lot at
Main Street and Mariposa Avenue - Project No. PW 97 -25, and approve of a transfer of $28,000.00
savings from the recently completed fiscal year 1997 -98 sewer mains repair project. Authorize Staff
to request payment of $3,000.00 for the project from the El Segundo High School car wash
organizers. (contract amount $56,906.36).
Minutes
City Council Regular Meeting
August 4, 1998
Page 7
0 G04G
Recommendation -
1) Approve transfer of $28,000.00 savings from recently completed FY1997 -98 Sewer Main
Repair project.
2) Award contract to lowest responsible bidder Century Paving, Inc., in the amount of
$56,906.36.
3) Authorize Mayor to execute the standard public works construction agreement after
approval as to form by City Attorney.
4) Authorize staff to request payment of $3,000 for project from the El Segundo High
School car wash organizers.
MOVED by Councilmember Gaines, SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell, to approve the
project and waive the $3,000 fee from the El Segundo High School. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent.
11. Authorization of $172,952.49 payment to Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) for
preliminary engineering /environmental assessment performed by MTA regarding Del Norte Green
Line Station.
MOVED by Councilmember Gaines SECONDED by Councilmember McDowell to authorize a
payment of $172,952.49 payment to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) for
preliminary engineering /environmental assessment performed by the MTA regarding the Del
Norte Green Line Station. MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOICE VOTE.
AYES: MAYOR PROTEM JACOBS, COUNCILMEMBERS GAINES AND
MCDOWELL; NOES: NONE; NOT - PARTICIPATING: MAYOR GORDON; ABSENT
COUNCILMEMBER WERNICK. 3/0/2.
13. Purchase of Frame Rate Millennium Bulletin Board System. (Fiscal Impact: $42,359).
MOVED by Mayor Gordon, SECONDED by Mayor ProTem Jacobs, to approve of purchase of
Frame Rate Millennium Bulletin Board System, Cost $42,359. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0. Councilmember Wernick was absent.
F. NEW BUSINESS - CITY MANAGER - NONE
G. NEW BUSINESS - CITY ATTORNEY - NONE
H. NEW BUSINESS - CITY CLERK - NONE
I. NEW BUSINESS - CITY TREASURER - NONE
60047 V �
Minutes
City Council Regular Meeting
August 4, 1998
Page 8
J. NEW BUSINESS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
Councilmember McDowell -
Spoke regarding the quality of the Commission/Committee applicants and the difficulty in choosing
only one.
Councilmember Gaines -
Gave a brief report regarding the recent SBCCOG meeting, and Information System study.
Councilmember Wernick - Absent
Mayor Pro Tem Jacobs -
Gave a brief report regarding the recent Southern California FAA task force meeting and announced
the web site address: http : / /www.awp.faa.gov /so_cal.ntm. Ms. Jacobs also reported on the
Historical Preservation Committee, and referred to a recent contact with a small business owner.
Mayor Gordon -
Authorization to retain Gladstein & Associates to complete the Downtown Visioning
Project.
Received Council consensus to award Contract No. 2621 to Gladstein & Associates to
complete the Downtown/Visioning Project, in an amount not to exceed $10,000.00;
addressed airport issues; a recent Board of Supervisors meeting; referred to a change in
the resolution to place the LAX expansion on the November ballot; addressed support
expressed by Mayors from Orange and Riverside Counties; and the Bay Cities Diabeites
fund raiser.
In response to Mayor Gordon's question, City Attorney, Mark Hensley, advised that the
former Council approved an extension or amendment to an existing contract, and that this
type of specialized service does not need to go through the formal RFP or Bid process.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - (Related to City Business On1X - 5 minute limit) Individuals Who have
received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer,
must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250.
Two (2) indivudals addressed Council
1. In response to Sandra Mason, resident's question, Interim City Manager, Tim Grimmond,
advised that a major pump station is being installed on Franklin.
00048
Minutes
City Council Regular Meeting
August 4, 1998
Page 9
2. Jane Friedkin, resident, felt the Safety and Noise Abatment Committee meetings should be
announced on Cable T. V . ; and that the interview process was not done fairly.
MEMORIALS: Della Wise, long time resident.
CLOSED SESSION: NONE.
The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act
(Government Code §54960, et seq.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property
Negotiator; and /or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and /or existing litigation; and /or
discussing matters covered under Government Code §54957 (Personnel); and /or conferring with the City's
Labor Negotiators; as follows:
Continuation of matters listed on the City Council Agenda for 5:00 p.m., August 4, 1998 under
"Closed Session" (if needed).
REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required). NONE.
ADJOURNMENT at 8:55 p.m. to August 18,1998 at 5:00 p.m.
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
C0�)4
Minutes
City Council Regular Meeting
August 4, 1998
Page 10
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Adoption of plans and specifications for construction of a storm drain in the 500 block of Washington Street -
Project No. PW 98-4 (estimated cost = $150,000.00).
RECOMMENDED L11 1 ACTION:
Adopt plans and specifications and authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of construction bids.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The adopted fiscal year 1998 -99 Capital Improvement Program includes a project to construct a storm drain
in the 500 block of Washington Street.
There is a low area in the 500 block of Washington Street, north of Pine Avenue. The drainage of this area is
currently being addressed by a small catch basin and a ten inch (10 ") diameter pipe within an easement in
private properties which discharges the storm water to Kansas Street. The storm water flows in the street until
it reaches the storm drain further down Kansas Street. The proposed work is intended to improve the drainage
of this area.
DISCUSSION:
Plans and specifications have been prepared by staff. The proposed work includes construction of a larger (24"
diameter) subsurface drain in Washington Street between Mariposa and Pine Avenues and in Pine Avenue
between Washington and Kansas Streets. Storm water from the proposed drain will be discharged into an
existing storm drain system in the intersection of Pine Avenue and Kansas Street.
The total estimated cost of the project, including staff costs for design, inspection and construction
contingencies is $150,000.00. Funds for this project have been allocated in the 1998 -99 Capital Improvement
Program.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Location map.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget:
Capital Improvement Budget:
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required:
No
Yes
$150,000.00
$150,000-00
$148.000.00 Date:
301-400-8205-8987 -
Adoptions of plans and specifications
No
ORIGINATED: j�,��,g Date: o
Eduard Schroder, Director of Public Works
ACTION TAKEN:
n NACOUNCILTW- AUG18.02 (Monday 8/10/98 9:00 AM) E-9
Ulir��)(;
s A
-i
o �
A
• � I A
Z
I�llrliT tT I
Le" VISTA of
.MrTwo It
va{wu R
• i
• + •� f coacor. R
ricMMor. It
.+f
Maw R
s _
w tiar.ar. It
N A y
y arl.a tS
tMCL.M It
plus R
Sig me&
•La.t.t •.
L.MRa It
►lew.tT .a wsTLar. Of
.IINA.LOW .4
� ctMTtr tt
LAV.CI w A
— rlvaN R
p•cMK Art
A patr avt C•Npoom& 1t
y Ma.tTTla .au {.t {L
y Mal uuv Art .a {Mw{T.r {T.
Pegg Arl
w ll. wt �ll�rMf ft
M
N.
are Y T i i NOW
w.i•Y R w
� {t►vlTt.. V
z — T3 14I
i
y � w
y •
Z ALLIED •
WAY
s•
R Y {M t•
Z pa.. OAT
.T. own"
_ ..t Of
avI•TI.0
rd V
0 s a.
o r. 5 s
I
v�
MINIM
�SIMON O"""M
I,l181
Xj
_ !�0urll
RAM
V
LDtc
r
0
• M tXKt. A.M011T t Kl.\ {t �
= Z
A
.�••••� -• tlpt :.gat � pa
AL t f N
s
n[T110 DttE[• : 1 � � ;
LET
r--J 1 11 11 11
��n
5 arm s s o c s s�
uCi ^t
N
i
a
r
�<
a
.•MILT .:
.
r--J 1 11 11 11
��n
5 arm s s o c s s�
uCi ^t
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Acceptance of the Roller Hockey Rink (Phase 1) construction in Recreation Park (final contract amount =
$55,999.00.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $1,000.00.
2. Accept the work as complete.
3. Authorize the City Clerk to file the City Engineer's Notice of Completion in the County Recorder's
Office.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
On April 21,1998, the City Council awarded a contract for $54,999.00 to Malibu Pacific Tennis Courts, Inc., for
construction of the Roller Hockey Rink in Recreation Park. Phase I of this project included construction of a
concrete rink slab and the associated relocation /removal of existing park improvements.
DISCUSSION:
During construction of the rink slab, an existing irrigation water main not shown on City records had to be
relocated to accommodate construction. Additionally, approximately 300 square feet of an existing concrete
walkway was removed to facilitate construction. The cost of the above work, which was not included in the
original contract, is $1,000.00 for which Change Order No. 1 is being requested. Sufficient funds are available
in the project budget and no additional appropriation is necessary for the requested Change Order.
All work has now been completed to staffs satisfaction. The final contract amount, including Change Order
No. 1, is $55,999.00.
Staff recommends City Council acceptance of the completed work.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Notice of Completion.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget:
Capital Improvement Budget:
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required:
$55,999-00
$75,000.00
$67,500.00 Date:
Acceptance of work
No
ORIGINATED: &A Date: f� / /Tr
f
r.5 ,?
NACOUNCILTW- AUG18.03 (Monday 8 -10 -98 1:00 PM' E-10
Recording Requested by
and When Recorded Mail To:
City Clerk, City Hall
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
Project Name : Roller Hockey Rink
Project No.: PW 97 -32
Notice is hereby given pursuant to State of California Civil Code Section 3093 at seq that:
1. The undersigned is an officer of the owner of the interest stated below in the property hereinafter
described.
2. The full name of the owner is: City of El Segundo
3. The full address of the owner is: City Hall, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA, 90245
4. The nature of the interest of the owner is: Public park.
5. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was field reviewed by the City
Engineer on 10/6/98. The work done was: Concrete Roller Hockey Rink.
6. On 10/18/98, the City Council of the City of El Segundo accepted the work of this contract as being
complete and directed the recording of this Notice of Completion in the Office of the County
Recorder.
7. The name of the Contractor for such work of improvement was: Malibu Pacific Tennis Courts, Inc.
8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of El Segundo,
County of Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows: El Segundo Recreation
Park.
9. The street address of said property is:
Dated:
Bellur K. Devaraj
City Engineer
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, say: I am the City Engineer of the City El Segundo, the declarant of the
foregoing Notice of Completion; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the
contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on , 1998 at El Segundo, California.
Bellur K. Devaraj
City Engineer
N:WOTICE'STW97- 32.NOC (8/5/98)
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Authorize stop signs for eastbound and westbound Pine Avenue at Kansas Street.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Adopt resolution.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The City Council has adopted a master resolution related to traffic and parking controls which establishes
certain parking restrictions, truck routes, stop sign controls, railroad grade crossings and one -way streets and
alleys. Historically, this resolution has been re- adopted in its entirety if any existing traffic related control is
modified or new controls are to be implemented. The most current of these resolutions is Resolution No. 4040
adopted by the City Council on October 21, 1997.
DISCUSSION:
The City Traffic Committee, comprised of the Public Works and Police Departments, received a request for
installation of stop signs for eastbound and westbound Pine Avenue traffic at Kansas Street. Currently Kansas
Street has stop signs in both the northbound and southbound directions.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Resolution for adoption.
2. Location map.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
Operating Budget:
Capital Improvement Budget:
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required:
continued on next page.......
Date:
ORIGINATED: , f, Date: g��,
dua S ro e 'rector o Public Works
REXX n Date:
46�ml - - - �%Z /yam
Page 1 of 2
PW- AUG18.01 (Monday 8/10/981:00 PM E -11
DISCUSSION:
Staff performed an analysis based upon Caltrans Warrant Study requirements for the justification of a four -way
stop intersection. The Kansas Street/Pine Avenue intersection did not meet the criteria for the installation of
four -way stop signs solely based on this analysis due to existing low traffic volumes and absence of accidents
on record at the intersection during the past three (3) years.
The Traffic Committee also field inspected the intersection for visibility. Traffic southbound on Kansas Street
stops at Pine Avenue before proceeding south of the stop sign. The visibility for this traffic to see the eastbound
Pine Avenue traffic is limited by an existing hedge on private property.
Eastbound Pine Avenue traffic west of Kansas Street travels downhill towards the intersection. There are two
(2) reported incidents of pets being killed in the vicinity of this intersection.
Even though the intersection does not warrant four -way stop signs based solely on the Caltrans Warrant Study,
the Traffic Committee feels that the particular conditions at the Pine Avenue /Kansas Street intersection warrant
additional consideration and mitigation. The Traffic Committee recommends City Council approval to install
four -way stop signs at the above intersection.
As previously indicated, historically the City has authorized these types of changes by modifying the previous
resolution and adopting it in its entirety. The attached resolution continues this practice. The only change to
the previously approved resolution is included in Section 5.95 on page 15 of the attached resolution.
Page 2 of 2
�; 0 , 5 PW- AUG18.01 (Monday 8/10/981:00 PM)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA,
DEFINING AND ESTABLISHING CERTAIN STREETS AND PARTS OF STREETS IN THE
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AS NO PARKING AREA, DIAGONAL PARKING ZONES, NO
STOPPING ZONES, TRUCK ROUTES, THROUGH STREETS AND STOP
INTERSECTIONS, RAILROAD GRADE CROSSINGS, AND ONE -WAY STREETS AND
ALLEYS AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 4040.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. No Parking Areas. The streets or portions streets numbered 1 in the first left
hand digit are hereby defined and established as "No Parking Areas" and shall be governed by the provisions
of subsections (2) and (4) of Section 10.28.040 of the "EL Segundo Municipal Code." [Where a side of a street
is not indicated then the restrictions shall apply to both sides of the street within the limits given.]
SUBSECTION 1.1 No Parking At Any Time
1.1.05 ALASKA AVENUE:
Douglas St. to Aviation Blvd.
1.1.10 APOLLO STREET:
Rosecrans Ave. to Park PI.
1.1.15 BUNGALOW DRIVE:
East Side:
El Segundo Blvd. to Elsey PI.
1.1.20 CALIFORNIA STREET:
Imperial Ave. to Imperial Hwy.
1.1.24 CONCORD PLACE:
East Side:
Maple Ave. to Sycamore Ave.
1.1.25 CONCORD STREET
East Side:
El Segundo Blvd. to Grand Ave.
1.1.30 CORAL CIRCLE:
Douglas St. to Douglas St.
1.1.35 DOUGLAS STREET:
Rosecrans Ave. to Utah St.
1.1.40 DULEY ROAD:
Grand Ave. to Mariposa Ave.
1.1.45 ELM AVENUE:
Hillcrest St. to 337 feet east of Hillcrest St.
1.1.50 EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD:
LEGEND
NeFthsile - Portion to be deleted from Resolution No. 4040
Northside - Portion to be added to Resolution No. 4040
North Side:
Whiting St. to Virginia St.
Concord St. to Richmond St.
1
1.1.55 ELSEY PLACE:
SoutSouth Side:
Bungalow Dr. to Center St.
1.1.60 FRANKLIN AVENUE:
North Side:
Richmond St. to Standard St.
Eucalyptus Dr. to Center St.
South Side:
Standard St. to Eucalyptus Dr.
1.1.55 HAWAII STREET:
Alaska Ave. to Aviation Blvd.
1.1.70 HOLLY AVENUE:
South Side:
Richmond St. to Main St.
1.1.75 IMPERIAL AVENUE:
North Side:
Hillcrest St. to west terminus
1.1.80 IRENE COURT:
South Side:
Penn St. to west terminus
1.1.85 LAPHAM STREET:
East Side:
Imperial Hwy. to 280 feet south of Imperial Hwy.
West Side:
Imperial Hwy. to 350 feet south of Imperial Hwy.
1.1.90 LOMA VISTA STREET:
East Side:
Franklin Ave. to Mariposa Ave.
Maple Ave. to Sycamore Ave.
1.1.95 MAPLE AVENUE:
North Side:
Hillcrest St. to 100 feet west of Hillcrest Street
1.1.100 MARIPOSA AVENUE:
South Side:
First alley west of Main St. to Main St.
1.1.105 NASH STREET:
Rosecrans Ave. to Park PI.
1.1.110 PARK PLACE:
Nash St. to Douglas St.
1.1.115 PALM AVENUE:
North Side:
Washington St. to Sepulveda Blvd.
South Side:
Virginia St. to Main St.
1.1.120 PINE AVENUE:
North Side:
First alley west of Main St. to Main St.
South Side:
Main St. to Standard St.
2
00f,5';
1.1.125 WALNUT AVENUE:
South Side:
Sepulveda Blvd. to 256 feet east of Sepulveda Blvd.
1.1.130 YUCCA STREET:
Maple Ave. to south terminus
SUBSECTION 1.2 No Parking 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM except Saturday and Sunday
1.2.20 KANSAS STREET:
West Side:
Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave.
1.2.25 OAK AVENUE:
South Side:
Center St. to California St.
SUBSECTION 1.3 No Parking 10:00 PM to 5:00 AM No Exceptions.
1.3.10 KANSAS STREET:
East Side:
Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave.
1.3.15 LAIRPORT STREET:
Mariposa Ave. to Maple Ave.
1.3.20 MAPLE AVENUE:
Sepulveda Blvd. to Nash St.
1.3.25 WALNUT AVENUE:
North Side:
Sepulveda Blvd. to Selby St.
South Side:
256 feet east of Sepulveda Blvd. to Selby St.
1.3.30 SELBY STREET:
Walnut Ave. to Imperial Hwy.
1.3.35 HUGHES WAY:
Sepulveda Boulevard to Allied Way.
SUBSECTION 1.4 No Parking - Street Sweeping Schedule.
1.4.05
ACACIA AVENUE:
West terminus to Cedar St.
8 AM to 10 AM
Tuesday
Pepper St. to Center St.
8 AM to 10 AM
Thursday
Center St. to east terminus
8 AM to 10 AM
Monday
1.4.10
ARENA STREET:
Pine Ave. to E/W alley north
of Mariposa Ave.
8 AM to 10 AM
Friday
Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Monday
1.4.15
BAYONNE STREET:
Palm Ave. to Maple Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Wednesday
1.4.20
BINDER PLACE:
. Loma Vista St. to Whiting St.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Tuesday
1.4.25
BUNGALOW DRIVE:
1
0 0(")5F
4
8 AM to 10 AM
Grand Ave. to 153 feet north
10 AM to 1 PM
of Pine Ave.
10 Am to 12 Noon
Mariposa Ave. to north
10 AM to 1 PM
terminus
1.4.30
CALIFORNIA STREET:
8 AM to 10 AM
Holly Ave. to Mariposa Ave.
8 AM to 10 AM
Mariposa Ave. to alley south
10 AM to 1 PM
of Imperial Ave.
10 AM to 1 PM
Alley south of Imperial Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
to Imperial Ave.
1.4.35
CEDAR STREET:
10 AM to 12 Noon
Walnut Ave. to Imperial Ave.
1.4.40
CENTER STREET:
8 AM to 10 AM
Grand Ave. to Mariposa Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
West Side:
10 AM to 12 Noon
Mariposa Ave. to Imperial Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
East Side:
Oak Ave. to Imperial Ave.
1.4.45
CONCORD PLACE:
West Side:
Maple Ave. to Sycamore Ave.
1.4.50
CONCORD STREET:
El Segundo BI. to Mariposa Av.
1.4.55
CYPRESS STREET:
Walnut Ave. to Imperial Ave.
1.4.60
DUNE STREET:
Sycamore Ave. to Acacia Ave.
1.4.65
ELM AVENUE:
California St. to Washington St.
1.4.70
EUCALYPTUS DRIVE:
Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave.
Grand Ave. to E/W alley north
of Mariposa Ave.
Oak Ave. to Imperial Ave.
1.4.75
FRANKLIN AVENUE:
West terminus to Main St.
1.4.80
HILLCREST STREET:
South terminus to Imperial Av.
1.4.85
HOLLY AVENUE:
Valley St. to Richmond St.
Standard St. to Eucalyptus Dr.
Penn St. to Lomita St.
Maryland St. to Center St.
California St. to Sepulveda BI.
1.4.90
ILLINOIS COURT:
Mariposa Av. to North terminus
1.4.95
ILLINOIS STREET:
Grand Ave. to Mariposa Ave.
1.4.100
IMPERIAL AVENUE:
North Side:
4
8 AM to 10 AM
Thursday
10 AM to 1 PM
Tuesday
10 Am to 12 Noon
Friday
10 AM to 1 PM
Tuesday
8 AM to 11 AM
Thursday
8 AM to 10 AM
Wednesday
8 AM to 10 AM
Thursday
10 AM to 1 PM
Tuesday
10 AM to 1 PM
Tuesday
8 AM to 10 AM
Wednesday
8 AM to 10 AM
Wednesday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Friday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Wednesday
8 AM to 11 AM
Monday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Monday
8 AM to 10 AM
Friday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Friday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Tuesday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Wednesday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Tuesday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Thursday
8 AM to 10 AM
Friday
8 AM to 10 AM
Friday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Monday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Tuesday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Tuesday
5
r
GO'J0 a
8 AM to 10 AM Tuesday
8 AM to 11 AM Thursday
10 AM to 1 PM Tuesday
10 AM to 12 Noon Friday
8 AM to 10 AM Thursday
10 AM to 12 Noon
West terminus to east terminus
10 AM to 12 Noon
South Side:
10 AM to 12 Noon
West terminus to east terminus
1.4.105
INDIANA COURT:
10 AM to 1 PM
Maple Ave. to south terminus
1.4.110
INDIANA STREET:
8 AM to 10 AM
Grand Ave. to Mariposa Ave.
1.4.115
IRENE COURT:
Penn St. to west terminus
1.4.120
KANSAS STREET:
Grand Ave. to Mariposa Ave.
1.4.125
LOMA VISTA STREET:
Binder PI. to Imperial Ave.
1.4.130
LOMITA STREET:
Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave.
Grand Ave. to 206 feet north
of Pine Ave.
Mariposa Ave. to Maple Ave.
Maple Ave. to Acacia Ave.
1.4.135
MAPLE AVENUE:
West terminus to Main St.
Center St. to Sepulveda Blvd.
North Side:
160 feet east of Penn St. to
Center St.
South Side:
Main St. to Center St.
1.4.140
MARIPOSA AVENUE:
West terminus to Hillcrest St.
Hillcrest St. to Richmond St.
Center St. to Indiana St.
North ide:
160 feet east of Penn St. to
Center St.
South Side:
Main St. to Center St.
1.4.145
MARYLAND STREET:
El Segundo Boulevard to
Franklin Ave
Franklin Ave. to 233 feet north
of Pine Ave.
Mariposa Ave. to north terminus
1.4.150
McCARTHY COURT:
Lomita St. to Imperial Ave.
1.4.155
NEVADA STREET:
154 feet south of Pine Ave.
to Mariposa Ave.
1.4.160
OAK AVENUE:
5
r
GO'J0 a
8 AM to 10 AM Tuesday
8 AM to 11 AM Thursday
10 AM to 1 PM Tuesday
10 AM to 12 Noon Friday
8 AM to 10 AM Thursday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Friday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Wednesday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Monday
8 AM to 10 AM
Thursday
10 AM to 1 PM
Tuesday
10 AM to 12 Noon
Friday
8 AM to 10 AM
Tuesday
8 AM to 10 AM
Monday
8 AM to 10 AM Thursday
8 AM to 10 AM Thursday
9 AM to 11 AM Tuesday
8 AM to 11 AM Tuesday
10 AM to 12 Noon Monday
10 AM to 12 Noon Thursday
10 AM to 12 Noon Thursday
4 AM to 7 AM Friday
8 AM to 10 AM Thursday
10 AM to 1 PM Tuesday
10 AM to 12 Noon Friday
10 AM to 12 Noon Friday
0
West terminus to Loma Vista St.
8 AM to 10 AM
Tuesday
Bayonne St. to Main St.
8 AM to 10 AM
Tuesday
Main St. to Penn St.
8 AM to 10 AM
Thursday
Center St. to Washington St.
8 AM to 11 AM
Monday
1.4.165
OREGON STREET:
383 feet south of Pine Ave. to
Mariposa Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Friday
1.4.170
PALM AVENUE:
West terminus to Main St.
8 AM to 11 AM
Tuesday
Sheldon St. to Center St.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Thursday
California St. to Sepulveda BI.
8 AM to 11 AM
Monday
1.4.175
PENN STREET:
Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Monday
Grand Ave. to Holly Ave
8 AM to 10 AM
Thursday
Pine Ave. to Maple Ave.
8 AM to 10 AM
Friday
Maple Ave. to Walnut Ave
10 AM to 12 Noon
Friday
1.4.180
PEPPER STREET:
Maple Ave. to Imperial Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Friday
1.4.185
PINE AVENUE:
West terminus to alley east of
Richmond St.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Tuesday
Standard St. to Sierra St.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Thursday
Sierra St. to Center St.
8 AM to 10 AM
Friday
200 feet west of Nevada St. to
Washington St.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Monday
Illinois St. to Indiana St.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Monday
1.4.190
REDWOOD AVENUE:
Dune St. to North terminus
8 AM to 10 AM
Tuesday
1.4.195
RICHMOND STREET:
Holly Ave. to Mariposa Ave.
8 AM to 10 AM
Wednesday
1.4.200
SHELDON STREET:
Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Monday
Grand Ave. to 378 feet North of
Grand Ave.
8 AM to 10 AM
Friday
Pine Ave. to Maple Ave.
8 AM to 10 AM
Friday
Maple Ave. to Imperial Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Friday
1.4.205
SIERRA PLACE:
Pine Ave. to Sierra St.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Thursday
1.4.210
SIERRA STREET:
Franklin Ave. to Grand Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Monday
Grand Ave. to Pine Ave.
8 AM to 10 AM
Thursday
Mariposa Ave. to Maple Ave.
8 AM to 10 AM
Friday
1.4.215
STANDARD STREET:
Grand Ave. to Mariposa Ave.
8 AM to 10 AM
Friday
1.4.220
SYCAMORE AVENUE:
West terminus to Main St.
8 AM to 10 AM
Tuesday
Pepper St. to Penn St.
8 AM to 10 AM
Thursday
Center St. to Sepulveda Blvd.
8 AM to 10 AM
Monday
1.4.225
VALLEY STREET:
South terminus to Pine Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Wednesday
0
1.4.230
VIRGINIA STREET:
El Segundo BI. to Imperial Av.
8 AM to 10 AM
Wednesday
1.4.235
WALNUT AVENUE:
Hillcrest St. to Main St.
8 AM to 10 AM
Tuesday
Main St. to McCarthy Ct.
8 AM to 10 AM
Thursday
Maryland St. to Center St.
8 AM to 10 AM
Thursday
Center St. to Washington St.
8 AM to 10 AM
Monday
1.4.240
WASHINGTON STREET:
Holly Ave. to Mariposa Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Friday
Mariposa Ave. to Walnut Ave.
10 AM to 1 PM
Tuesday
1.4.245
WHITING STREET:
El Segundo Blvd. to Palm Ave.
10 AM to 12 Noon
Wednesday
SUBSECTION
1.5 No Parking 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM and 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM Monday through Friday Except
by Permit.
1.5.05 ACACIA AVENUE:
Center St. to east terminus
1.5.10 CALIFORNIA STREET:
Walnut Ave. to alley south of Imperial Ave.
1.5.15 WALNUT AVENUE:
California St. to Washington St.
1.5.20 WASHINGTON STREET:
Maple Ave. to Walnut Ave.
SECTION 2. Diagonal Parkina Zones. The streets or portions of streets in this city
hereinafter described in sections numbered 2 in the first left hand digit are hereby defined and established as
"Diagonal Parking Zones" and shall be governed by the provisions of Section 10.32.060 of the "El Segundo
Municipal Code."
SUBSECTION 2.00 Diagonal Parking Zones
2.10 EUCALYPTUS DRIVE:
East Side:
340 feet north of Grand Ave. to Pine Ave.
2.15 HOLLY AVENUE:
South Side:
Main St. to Standard St.
2.20 LAPHAM STREET:
East Side:
50 feet north of 118th St. to 370 feet south of Imperial Hwy.
West Side:
400 feet south of Imperial Hwy. to 118th St.
2.25 MARIPOSA AVENUE:
North Side:
Richmond St. to Main St.
2.30 OAK AVENUE:
North Side:
Main St. to Eucalyptus Dr.
7
U 0
i�j�'
�,
2.35 PINE AVENUE:
South Side:
Eucalyptus Dr. to 200 feet east of Eucalyptus Dr.
Arena St. to Sheldon St.
2.40 RICHMOND STREET:
East Side:
190 feet north of Mariposa Ave. to Palm Ave.
2.45 SHELDON STREET:
West Side:
80 feet north of Palm Ave. to 55 feet south of Palm Ave.
SECTION 3. No Stopping Tow Away Zones. The streets or portions of streets in this city
hereinafter described in sections numbered 3 in the first left hand digit are hereby defined and established as
"No Stopping Tow Away Zones" and shall be governed by the provisions of Section 10.28.170 of the "El
Segundo Municipal Code."
SUBSECTION 3.1 No Stopping at Any Time, tow Away.
3.1.05 AVIATION BOULEVARD:
East Side:
1566 feet south of El Segundo Blvd. to 124 feet south of 124th St.
West Side:
116th St. to Rosecrans Ave.
3.1.10 CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD:
El Segundo Blvd. to Mariposa Ave.
3.1.15 DOUGLAS STREET:
Utah Avenue to Imperial Highway.
3.1.20 EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD:
Richmond St. to Isis Ave.
South Side:
Isis Ave. to 1 -405 Freeway Southbound ramp
3.1.25 GRAND AVENUE:
Illinois St. to Nash St.
West city boundary to Loma Vista St.
North Side:
125 feet east of Standard St. to Eucalyptus Dr.
North Side Center Divider:
Main St. to first alley east of Main St.
Standard St. to 142 feet west of Eucalyptus Dr.
South Side:
Standard St. to Eucalyptus Dr.
South Side Center Divider:
Main St. to first alley east of Main St.
185 feet east of Standard St. to 142 feet west of
Eucalyptus Dr.
3.1.30 HILLCREST STREET:
Imperial Ave. to Imperial Hwy.
3.1.35 IMPERIAL AVENUE:
0
South Side:
650 feet west of Sepulveda Blvd. to Imperial Hwy.
3.1.40 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY:
South Side:
Imperial Ave. to east city boundary.
3.1.45 MAIN STREET:
Imperial Ave. to Imperial Hwy.
3.1.50 MAPLE AVENUE:
North Side:
Main St. to 200 feet east of Penn St.
3.1.55 MARIPOSA AVENUE:
North Side:
Illinois Ct. to Lairport St.
Main St. to 200 feet east of Penn St.
South Side:
Indiana St. to Sepulveda Blvd.
3.1.60 NASH STREET:
El Segundo Blvd. to Imperial Hwy.
3.1.65 ROSECRANS AVENUE:
North Side:
Aviation Blvd. to west city boundary
3.1.70 SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD:
East Side:
Rosecrans Ave. to Imperial Hwy.
West Side:
Rosecrans Ave. to Grand Ave.
Sycamore Ave. to Imperial Hwy.
3.1.75 UTAH AVENUE:
Douglas St. to Aviation Blvd.
3.1.80 VISTA DEL MAR:
South city boundary to north city boundary.
3.1.85 WALNUT AVENUE:
Washington St. to Sepulveda Blvd.
3.1.90 118TH STREET:
Lapham St. to Aviation Blvd.
3.1.95 120TH STREET:
220 feet west of Aviation Blvd. to Aviation Blvd.
3.1.100 UNNAMED right turn connecting roadway from westbound
El Segundo Blvd. to northbound Douglas St.
3.1.105 UNNAMED right turn connecting roadway from northbound
Main St. to eastbound Imperial Hwy.
3.1.110 UNNAMED right turn connecting roadway from eastbound
Imperial Hwy. to southbound Main St.
SUBSECTION 3.2 No Stopping Tow Away 6:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM Except Saturday
and Sunday.
3.2.05 GRAND AVENUE:
Illinois St. to Eucalyptus Dr.
Concord St. to Loma Vista St.
9
0 C,G f
3.2.10 MARIPOSA AVENUE:
North Side:
Lairport St. to Douglas St.
South Side:
Sepulveda Blvd. to Douglas St.
3.2.15 SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD:
West Side:
Grand Ave. to Sycamore Ave.
SECTION 4. Truck Routes. The streets or portions of streets in this city hereinafter
described in sections numbered 4 in "EL Segundo Municipal Code."
SUBSECTION 4.00 Truck Routes.
4.05 AVIATION BOULEVARD:
116th St. to Rosecrans Ave.
4.10 CALIFORNIA STREET:
Imperial Ave. to Imperial Hwy.
4.15 EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD:
Main St. to Isis Ave.
4.20 GRAND AVENUE:
West city boundary to Sepulveda Blvd.
4.25 IMPERIAL AVENUE:
California St. to Sepulveda Blvd.
4.30 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY:
Sepulveda Blvd. to east city boundary.
4.35 MAIN STREET:
El Segundo Blvd. to Grand Ave.
4.40 ROSECRANS AVENUE:
West city boundary to Aviation Blvd.
4.45 VISTA DEL MAR:
South city boundary to north city boundary.
SECTION 5. Through Streets and Stop Intersections. The streets or portions of streets,
intersections or entrances thereto in this city hereinafter described in section numbered 5 in the first left hand
digit, are hereby established as "Through Streets and Stop Intersections" and shall be governed by the
provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of Section 10.44.020 of the "EL Segundo Municipal Code."
SUBSECTION 5.00 Stop Intersections
5.05 ACACIA AVENUE:
California St., all entrances.
Cedar St., W entrance.
Center St., E/W entrances.
Cypress St., W entrance.
Dune St., S entrance.
Eucalyptus Dr., E/W entrances.
Hillcrest St., E/W entrances.
Loma Vista St., E/W entrances.
Pepper St., E entrance.
Virginia St., E/W entrances.
10
5.10
ALASKA AVENUE:
Douglas St., E /N /S entrances.
Hawaii St., S entrance.
5.15
CORAL CIRCLE(N):
Douglas St., W entrance.
5.20
CORAL CIRCLE(S):
Douglas St., W entrance.
5.25
ELM AVENUE:
California St., E entrance.
Hillcrest St., E entrance.
Washington St., all entrances.
5.30
EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD:
Arena St., N entrance.
Bungalow Dr., N entrance.
Center St., N entrance.
Concord St., N entrance.
Eucalyptus Dr., N entrance.
Kansas St., N entrance.
Lomita St., N entrance.
Main St., N /E/W entrances.
Maryland St., N entrance.
Nevada St., N entrance.
Oregon St., N entrance.
Penn St., N entrance.
Richmond St., N entrance.
Sheldon St., N entrance.
Sierra St., N entrance.
Standard St., N entrance.
Virginia St., N entrance.
5.35
ELSEY PLACE:
Center St., W entrance.
5.40
FRANKLIN AVENUE:
Arena St., N/S entrances.
California St., N entrance.
Center St., E/W entrances.
Concord St., E/W entrances.
Eucalyptus Dr., N/S entrances.
Illinois St., W entrance.
Kansas St., E/W entrances.
Loma Vista St., N/S entrances.
Lomita St., all entrances.
Main St., E/W entrances.
Maryland St., all entrances.
Nevada St., N/S entrances.
Oregon St., all entrances.
Penn St., N/S entrances.
Richmond St., E/W entrances.
Sheldon St., E/W entrances.
Sierra St., N/S entrances.
Standard St., all entrances.
Virginia St., N/S entrances.
Whiting St., N/S entrances.
11
��
0 6
5.45 GRAND AVENUE:
Arena St., S entrance.
Bungalow Dr., N entrance.
California St., S entrance.
Center St., all entrances.
Concord St., all entrances.
Eucalyptus Dr., all entrances.
Illinois St., N entrance.
Indiana St., N entrance.
Loma Vista St., N/S entrances.
Maryland St., N/S entrances.
Nevada St., N/S entrances.
Oregon St., S entrance.
Penn St., N/S entrances.
Richmond St., all entrances.
Sheldon St., N/S entrances.
Sierra St., N/S entrances.
Standard St., N/S entrances.
Virginia St., N/S entrances.
Whiting St., all entrances.
5.50 HAWAII STREET:
Aviation Blvd., W entrance.
5.55 HOLLY AVENUE:
Bungalow Dr., N/S entrances.
California St., N/E entrances.
Center St., W entrance.
Concord St., all entrances.
Eucalyptus Dr., all entrances.
Illinois St., all entrances.
Indiana St., all entrances.
Kansas St., all entrances.
Loma Vista St., N/S entrances.
Lomita St., W entrance.
Maryland St., E entrance.
Richmond St., all entrances.
Sepulveda Blvd., W entrance.
Sierra St., N/S entrances.
Standard St., all entrances.
Valley St., E entrance.
Virginia St., E/W entrances.
Washington St., E/W /N entrances.
Whiting St., E/W entrances.
5.60 IMPERIAL AVENUE:
California St., E/W /S entrances.
Cedar St., S entrance.
Center St., E/W /S entrance.
Cypress St., S entrance.
Eucalyptus Dr., S entrance.
12
Hillcrest St., all entrances.
Loma Vista St., E/W /S entrances.
Main St., E/W entrances.
McCarthy Ct., S entrance.
Pepper St., S entrance.
Sheldon St., E/W /S entrances.
Virginia St„ E/W /S entrances.
5.65 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY:
Hillcrest St., S entrance.
Lapham St., S entrance.
Main St., E to S turn.
Selby St., S entrance.
5.70 MAPLE AVENUE:
Bayonne St., S entrance.
Bungalow Dr., N/S entrances.
California St., all entrances.
Center St., all entrances.
Eucalyptus Dr., all entrances.
Hillcrest St., all entrances.
Indiana Ct., S entrance.
Lairport St., S entrance.
Loma Vista St., E/W entrances.
Lomita St., all entrances.
Main St., all entrances.
Maryland St., N/S entrances.
Nash St., W entrance.
Penn St., all entrances.
Pepper St., N entrance.
Sheldon St., all entrances.
Sierra St., S entrance.
Virginia St., E/W entrances.
Washington St., all entrances.
5.75 MARIPOSA AVENUE:
Arena St., N/S entrances.
Bungalow Dr., N entrance.
California St., all entrances.
Center St., all entrances.
Concord St., S entrance.
Duley Rd., S entrance.
Eucalyptus Dr., N/S entrances.
Hillcrest St., N/S entrances.
Illinois St., S entrance.
Illinois Ct., N entrance.
Indiana St., S entrance.
Kansas St., S entrance.
Loma Vista St., (West) all entrances.
Loma Vista St., (East) S entrance.
Lomita St., N entrance.
13
F G i,
Maryland St., N entrance.
Nevada St., S entrance.
Oregon St., S entrance.
Penn St., N/S entrances.
Richmond St., all entrances.
Sheldon St., all entrances.
Sierra St., N entrance.
Standard St., S entrance.
Virginia St., all entrances.
Washington St., N/S entrances.
Whiting St., all entrances.
5.78 McCARTHY COURT:
Lomita St., W entrance.
5.80 OAK AVENUE:
Bayonne St., E entrance.
California St., all entrances.
Center St., E entrance.
Eucalyptus Dr., N entrance.
Hillcrest St., E/W entrances.
Loma Vista St., W entrance.
Main St., E/W entrances.
Penn St., W entrance.
Sheldon St., all entrances.
Virginia St., E/W entrances.
Washington St., all entrances.
5.85 PALM AVENUE:
Bayonne St., N entrance.
Bungalow Dr., N/S entrances.
California St., all entrances.
Center St., N /S/W entrances.
Hillcrest St. (East), S entrance.
Hillcrest St. (West), all entrances.
Loma Vista St., N/S entrances.
Lomita St., N/S entrances.
Maryland St., all entrances.
Penn St., N/S entrances.
Richmond St., all entrances.
Sepulveda Blvd., W entrance.
Sheldon St., E entrance.
Sierra St., N/S entrances.
Virginia St., all entrances.
Washington St., all entrances.
Whiting St., S entrance.
5.90 PARK PLACE:
Apollo St., E/W /S entrances.
Douglas St., W entrance.
Nash St., E entrance.
14
0 1, G 11
v J
5.95
PINE AVENUE:
Arena St., N entrance.
Bungalow Dr., N/S entrances.
California St., all entrances.
Center St., all entrances.
Concord St., N/S entrances.
Eucalyptus Dr., all entrances.
Hillcrest St., E/W entrances.
Illinois St., E entrance.
Indiana St., W entrance.
Kansas St., NHS all entrances.
Loma Vista St., all entrances.
Lomita St., all entrances.
Main St., all entrances.
Maryland St., N/S entrances.
Nevada Street, E/W entrances.
Oregon St., N/S entrances.
Penn St., N entrance.
Richmond St., all entrances.
Sheldon St., N /E/W entrances.
Sierra PI., N entrance.
Sierra St., S entrance.
Standard St., all entrances.
Valley St., S entrance.
Virginia St., all entrances.
Washington St., all entrances.
Whiting St., N/S entrances.
5.98
REDWOOD AVENUE:
Dune St, E entrance.
5.100
ROSECRANS AVENUE:
Apollo St., N entrance.
5.105
SYCAMORE AVENUE:
California St., all entrances.
Center St., E entrance.
Dune St., N entrance.
Eucalyptus Dr., E/W entrances.
Hillcrest St., EM/ entrances.
Loma Vista St., all entrances.
Main St., W entrance.
Penn St., W entrance.
Pepper St., E entrance.
Sepulveda Blvd., W entrance.
Sheldon St., E/W entrances.
Virginia St., all entrances.
Washington St., all entrances.
5.110
UTAH AVENUE:
Douglas St., E entrance.
15
5.115 WALNUT AVENUE:
Bungalow St., N/S entrances.
California St., all entrances.
Cedar St., N entrance.
Center St., all entrances.
Cypress St., N entrance.
Eucalyptus Dr., all entrances.
Hillcrest St., all entrances.
Loma Vista St., E/W entrances.
Main St., E/W entrances.
McCarthy Ct., W /N /S entrances.
Penn St., E/W /S entrances.
Pepper St., N/S entrances.
Selby St., N/W entrances.
Sheldon St., N/S entrances.
Virginia St., -&F all entrances.
Washington St., all entrances.
SECTION 6. Railroad Grade Crossings. The railroad grade crossings in this city
hereinafter described in sections numbered 6 in the first left hand digit are hereby defined and established
as "Railroad Grade Crossings" and shall be governed by the provisions of Section 10.44.020 (c) of the "EL
Segundo Municipal Code."
SUBSECTION 6.0 Railroad Grade Crossings.
6.05 AVIATION BOULEVARD:
1566 feet south of El Segundo Blvd. -- Southern Pacific No. BBF 499.14.
6.10 DOUGLAS STREET:
170 feet north of Utah Ave. - -A.T. & S.F. No. 2H -14.7.
240 feet north of Utah Ave. -- Southern Pacific No. BBF 499.43.
6.15 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY:
Aviation Blvd. - -A.T. & S.F. No. 2H -13.1.
6.20 LAPHAM STREET:
350 feet south of Imperial Hwy. - -A.T. & S.F. No. 2H- 13.2C.
6.40 SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD:
900 feet north of Rosecrans Ave. -- Southern Pacific No. BBF 500.34/C.
6.50 118TH STREET:
Aviation Blvd. - -A.T. & S.F. No. 2H -13.4.
6.55 120TH STREET:
Aviation Blvd. - -A.T. & S.F. No. 2H -13.6.
SECTION 7. One -Way Streets.
The streets or alleys or portions of streets or alleys in this City hereafter described in
section numbered 7 in the first left hand digit, are hereby established as one -way streets or alleys and
shall be governed by Chapter 10.48 of the "El Segundo Municipal Code ".
7.05 Richmond Street - Palm Avenue to Mariposa Ave.(southbound).
7.10 Nash Street - El Segundo Boulevard to Imperial Highway (southbound)
7.15 Douglas Street - El Segundo Boulevard to Imperial Highway (northbound)
16
n (' "1 1
U.! j .._
SECTION 8. Resolution No. 4040 is hereby rescinded.
SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall
enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said city; and shall make a minute of the passage and
adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the
meeting at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18"' day of August, 1998.
Mike Gordon, Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number
of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed
and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City
Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18`h day of August, 1998, and the same
was so passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. Oensley, City Attorney
U
N:\RESO'S \TRAFFIC.RSO (Tuesday 8/4/98 2:00 PM)
17
, � r" 1*1
0U v i
I
9
p HSVN ilt \
Orr- Al
I�v \
O
O
Z
c�
W
h
J
W
2
L� N �
10 Ill
NOl I VIA
ai
a
LwJ Li Y
VINa0�11V0
a
VoNne
A
amnoc�o ®e
B = ®BI
mul
- 09
Iii
1S VNVIONI
1S SION1111
1S NOIONIHSVM
Is
'IS
IS
'IS
'IS
•aa
•1 S
'IS
Is
1S
'IS
1S
M
- 'aa
It
1S
Is
1S
1S
'1S
'IS
is
SVSNVII
VINao�I�VO
4
�
N003NO
Vavn3N
A
a31N33
W
M01VONns
IxaVH
V11
Vaa31S
NN3d
N0013HS
VN3aV
Sn1dAivon3
--
ONVONVIS
NIVw
ONOwH01a
OHOONO3
VINIOVIA
ONIIIHM•
VISIA VM OI
r
r J
J•
a
� s
s\
V
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Request for approval of two approximately 827.25 square foot wall signs and two temporary banners for Hughes
Electronics to be located on the top of the northeast and southeast facing walls of 200 North Sepulveda Boulevard
(Sign Plan 98 -21). Applicant: Hughes Electronics.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Approve proposed wall signs; and /or,
2) Other possible action /direction.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
Hughes Electronics has submitted a request to construct two identical wall signs to be mounted on the top of the
northeast and southeast facing walls of 200 North Sepulveda Boulevard (Pacific Corporate Towers), a 20 story office
building. The signs would contain the word "Hughes" in a blue color and a "orbit" graphic underneath the letters in a
multi -color design. The proposed signs would also be illuminated. Hughes Electronics may also desire to place two
smaller temporary banners on the walls of the building while the permanent signs are being fabricated.
DISCUSSION:
Section 20.60.030 F of the Zoning Code states that any proposed sign over 500 square feet in area requires review
and approval of the City Council. The proposed signs would exceed 500 square feet by 400 feet when measured from
the perimeter of the text and the orbit graphic. When viewed as separate elements, the letters and orbit comprise
827.25 square feet. The letters by themselves are 517 square feet (9' by 57' -6 "'). The orbit graphic is approximately
309.25 square feet (64' by 59'). However, the signs would take up approximately only 1.8% of each building wall,
which is less than the 5% maximum permitted by the Zoning Code. Hughes Electronics and DirecTV currently occupy
approximately 10 floors in this building.
The City Council has previously approved at least one other large wall sign for a corporate tenant on a large office
building. On January 3, 1990, the Council approved two 536 square foot wall signs for Mattel Toys on the top of their
building at 333 Continental Boulevard. Those signs occupy approximately 2.2% of each building wall on which they
are located.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Request Letter from Hughes Electronics
2. Photo Simulation of Signs
3. Elevation Drawing and Site Plan of the Building
4. Partial Northeast Elevation of Sign
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ORIGINATED: Date: 10 August 1998
Fof Bret B. Ber ard, AICP, Dir ning and Building Safety
REVIEWED BY:
TAKEN:
Date:
p: \projects\sp98° 1 cr_doc
E -12
August 6, 1998
City of El Segundo
City Council Members
Department of Planning and Building Safety
City Hall
350 Main Street
El Segundo, Ca. 90245
RE: Pacific Corporate Towers .... Hughes Signage
Dear Council Members:
Hughes Electronic Corporations respectfully requests approval of the proposed new
Hughes Corporate logos for the Corporate Headquarters located at 200 No. Sepulveda
Boulevard. The attached elevations, graphic layout and building "mock up" photograph
depict size, and visual effect of the actual proposed signage.
The design intent of the new Hughes logo at the top of building is to balance the
signage with the mass of the building face.
We are aware of your code requirements in section 20,603030 page 266 Sign Area
and Height. Each building elevation has 45,552 square foot of area, 5% of that area
is 2278 square feet. The Hughes logo has a 827.25 square feet of sign area.
We understand that this exceeds the 500 square foot provision limitation, but we feel
that the sign is tastefully designed for maximum visibility.
There are several high rise buildings in El Segundo with signage at the top of the
building that is designed in keeping with the size and mass of architectural elements,
ie. Direct TV, Mattel, and ATT.
On behalf of Hughes Electronics Corporation, I wish to state that we appreciate the
support and assistance received from the Department of Planning and Building
Safety and thank the City Council for your time and consideration.
Sincerel
-AW
Mark Connors
Manager
Hughes Corporate Facilities and Administration
cc: Bret Bernard, Director
Paul Garry, Planner
ri r 'I U
ELECTRONICS
- 61998
PLANNING DIVISION
Corporate Offices
200 North Sepulveda Boulevard
PO Box 956, El Segundo CA 90245 -0956
(310) 364 -6000
d {Yf ✓' �' 9i ty} Y A y�ra �. •/ +il J� �n i
OWN
l�b�� Jar � iu0.1
J�E�od l
,R
o
}9 aSYr �1a' �t �9� 7 t t
Y 3*y ylA }/:IXH Yj
.➢ )t Y'.t
'k a .141il
� dli 7kY ,,r4
i
J
{ _YY
y
l
i
i.
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
AGENDA DESCRI
MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
Request for proposals (RFP) and statements of qualifications from qualified consultants to prepare a requisite
update of the General Plan Housing Element. Fiscal Impact: Not to exceed $30,000.00.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Authorize staff to solicit proposals from qualified consultants.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The California State Housing Element Law (Government Code Article 10.6) requires cities to revise or update
their Housing Elements at least every five years. The City's existing Housing Element was last revised in
1992 (six years ago) as part of an overall General Plan update. Although the subsequent update was
(conceptually) due in 1997, the statewide deadline to submit revised Housing Elements was extended twice
by the State Legislature: first to June 30, 1998 (by SB 1073) and then, to the current deadline of June 30, 1999
(by SB 320). According to the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development
(HCD), these extensions resulted from budget cut backs which eliminated funding for Council Of Governments
(COGs, or in the City's case - SCAG), who are responsible for calculating each locality's share of the regional
housing need. Without these figures from the COG's (i.e., SCAG), cities could not revise their Housing
Elements and therefore, the revision deadlines were extended. Although the State budget currently has funds
allocated for COG's, the budget is currently suspended. Nonetheless, it is anticipated that no further
extensions will be made, and that the revised Housing Element is due to HCD by June 30, 1999.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Draft Request for Proposal and Statement of Qualifications.
Draft Consultant List
FISCAL IMPACT:
(Check one) Operating Budget:_ Capital Improv. Budget:
Amount Requested: $30,000.00
Project/Account Budget: $30,000.00
Project/Account Balance: $30,000.00 Date:
Account Number: 001 - 400 - 2701 - 6214
Project Phase: N/A
Appropriation Required - Yes_ No�L
ORIGINATED:
Bret B. Bernard
tlP, rector
Planninq and Build
Date: 4 Aug 1
REVIEWED BY: Date:
E -13
Housing Element Update RFP
City Council Staff Report
August 18, 1998
DISCUSSION:
Staff has prepared the attached draft "request for proposals and statements of qualifications" document. The
document includes the City's objectives for the project, the scope of services anticipated, the required
deliverables, the proposal requirements, as well as the selection criteria and procedure for choosing the
consultant.
Once staff has received City Council authorization to solicit proposals from qualified consultants, staff will mail
the RFP to various consultants who have expressed an interest in receiving the RFP, as well as to those
consultants knowingly accredited with preparing General Plans and Housing Element updates. Then, staff
will select the top -rated three or four consultants and invite them to discuss their proposals with staff in an
interview. From this group, staff will make a recommendation for approval to the City Council to retain one of
these consultants.
This project to update the General Plan Housing Element was budgeted in FY 1997 -1998 for $30,000.00.
Since the project was not initiated last fiscal year (due to the aforementioned extension), it (and the monies)
have been carried over to the current budget year, FY 1998 -1999 for the same amount.
PAhannaMhouselmhais
(J ,o ') U v
- DRAFT -
Date
Name
Firm
Address
City, State Zip Code
RE: Request for Proposals and Statements of Qualifications for the City of El
Segundo General Plan Housing Element Update Project
Dear Sir /Madam:
The City of El Segundo is requesting written proposals and statements of qualifications
for professional planning services from qualified consultants and firms (hereinafter
referred to as "consultant ") to prepare an update of its General Plan Housing Element.
The existing Housing Element, which was not certified by the State of California
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), was last revised in 1992
as part of an overall General Plan update. Copies of the existing Housing Element can
be obtained for $3.30 (each) from the City's Planning Division.
♦ General Information
The City of El Segundo is located in the Airport/South Bay subregion of Los Angeles
County and is 5.46 square miles in size. It is bounded by Los Angeles International
Airport to the north, County of Los Angeles and the city of Hawthorne to the east, the
city of Manhattan Beach to the south and, the Pacific Ocean and the city of Los
Angeles Wastewater Treatment Plant and Scattergood Generating Station to the west.
In 1997, it had an estimated resident population of 16,250 and a daytime working
population in excess of 60,000 persons. There were a total of 7,190 (known) dwelling
units in 1997.
♦ City Objectives
The City's objectives include, but are not limited to the following:
✓ Submission to HCD, no less than one month prior to the June 30, 1999
deadline
✓ Conformance with all requirements of the California Government Code
Article 10.6 (Housing Element Law)
✓ Consistency with the City's General Plan and the Subdivision and Zoning
Code
✓ Certification by HCD
DRAFT -
r� `v - Page 1 of 5 -
v
- DRAFT -
♦ Scope of Services
Under the overall project management of the Director of Planning and Building Safety,
the selected consultant shall provide the following anticipated services:
Preparation of radius map and current property ownership list and labels
Preparation and mailing of notices for public hearings and workshops
Publication of 1/8 page ad in the newspaper and notification of agencies and
surrounding Cities
Preparation of staff reports and exhibits to the Planning Commission, City
Council and workshops
Preparation of the drafts and final updated Housing Element document (including
tables, graphs, maps, etc.)
Preparation of addendums and revisions to any of the above - mentioned
documents (revisions shall be presented in a red -line /strike out format)
Preparation and mailing of environmental documents (Initial Study, Negative
Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, Responses to draft Initial Study
comments, Notices of Declaration /Fish and Game Exemption)
Attendance and participation at City staff meetings, Planning Commission and
City Council ad hoc committee meetings, public hearings, and workshops
sk Preparation of miscellaneous letters, memos or other documents as required by
City staff
♦ Deliverables
All documents, notices, labels and maps mentioned above in the "Scope of Services"
section. In addition, all written documents (notices, reports, housing element update,
etc.) shall be presented on a floppy diskette in Word 6.0 or Word '97 format, and sent
via e-mail, as required by the City. Regular updates of the documents on floppy disk
and e-mail shall be provided to City staff as drafts are revised and finalized.
Furthermore, the consultant shall provide a project schedule which shows the
anticipated time frame for completing each task. The City anticipates a five to six
month schedule, with the Housing Element Update submitted to HCD no later than May
1999.
DRAFT -
�' i - Page 2 of 5 -
- DRAFT -
♦ Proposal and Statement of Qualifications
The proposal, at a minimum, should include the following information:
Name, address, telephone number, facsimile number, and e-mail address of the
firm.
2. List of Cities where the consultant has prepared (or is in the process of
preparing) a Housing Element or Housing Element Update within the last eight
years. Provide the names and telephone numbers of persons at each City who
can be contacted to discuss that particular project. Also, please indicate whether
the document was certified by HCD and /or legally challenged (if litigation did
occur, indicate the outcome, if known).
3. The names and telephone numbers of the consultant's project team, including
the name of the project manager, and the subconsultants to be retained by the
consultant. Submit the resumes of all personnel (including sub - consultants) to
be involved with the project and their specific experiences relative to the
preparation of housing elements and environmental documents. The consultant
shall also submit an organization chart which shows the reporting relationships of
all involved personnel.
4. Consultant's understanding of the project and a description of how the consultant
will approach the project.
5. Consultant's qualifications and prior recent experience in preparing Housing
Elements or Housing Element Updates for local governments; and, success rate
in having these elements /updates certified by the State.
6. Consultant's knowledge of Government Code Article 10.6 (Housing Element
Law), specifically those sections referring to Housing Element updates and
revisions. Explain how you would apply this statute to the City of El Segundo,
taking into consideration the specific goals, policies and standards of this
community.
7. Scope of services to be provided with a breakdown of different tasks. It should
include a detailed description of the methods of information gathering and
analysis to be used in preparing the Housing Element (i.e., How will you
approach this project ?), as well as how this method will best meet the City's
Objectives. Also, indicate which members of the project team will be responsible
for the various task(s) and attendance at meetings. The submittal should also
provide a detailed description of any requested material needed from the City.
UUr��J
DRAFT -
Page 3 of 5 -
- DRAFT -
8. Consultant's estimated fee for the project, with a not -to- exceed amount. The
cost estimates provided by the consultant shall reflect detailed projected man -
hours per the scope of services to be provided, including the cost for attendance
at meetings, mileage, and projected reproduction costs. This should be
accompanied by a list of the hourly rates for each member of the project team,
including clerical, and expected subcontractor rates. Cost estimates shall also
include contingencies with upper limits. Include all assumptions made in arriving
at the quoted figures.
9. Proposed time frame to provide the services starting from the date of receipt of a
Notice to Proceed from the City. A short time frame to perform the services is
highly desirable. As stated previously, the City anticipates a five to six month
schedule.
10. A statement that consultant is agreeable to execute the enclosed City- Consultant
agreement and to provide proof of insurance as noted in the agreement.
11. Five references. Include the person's name, title, address and telephone
number. Indicate the nature of this professional relationship (i.e., former client,
etc.).
♦ Selection Criteria
The following factors (not necessarily listed in order of priority) will be among those
evaluated by the City during the selection process:
1. City Objectives: The City will evaluate the degree to which the proposal would
achieve the objectives for the project. Creative input from the consultant is
encouraged along with any additional tasks the consultant believes would
further these objectives.
2. Consultant Qualifications: The qualifications and successful experience of the
lead consultant and subcontractors are of a high priority to the City.
3. Consultant Ability: The proposal should demonstrate the consultant's ability to
complete projects of this type successfully and in a timely manner.
4. Consultant's Understanding of the City of El Segundo: The proposal should
demonstrate the consultant's knowledge of the City of El Segundo. "Boiler-
plate" or "generic" proposals should be avoided. The consultant should be
aware of the specific goals, policies and standards of this community, as well
as its locale in the Airport/South Bay subregion, its unique characteristics and
its unusual population- housing characteristics.
5. Costs: The proposal must be financially feasible, with reasonability of costs a
consideration.
DRAFT -
Page 4 of 5 -
- DRAFT -
6. Compliance: The proposal must demonstrate the consultant's ability to
comply with California State law (and all other applicable laws).
7. Completeness: A complete proposal is required for consideration. An
incomplete proposal will not be further evaluated and the consultant shall be
so notified. Refer to the "Proposal and Statement of Qualifications" section,
for proposal requirements.
8. References: References will be checked prior to the interview.
♦ Selection Process
All proposals received prior to the submission deadline, and which are complete, will be
reviewed for consideration. The proposals are not considered public information and
therefore, will not warrant public disclosure. After the City has reviewed the proposals,
the three or four top -rated consultants will be requested to discuss their proposals with
City staff. This interview will be the basis for making a recommendation for
consideration and selection of a consultant to the City Council.
After the City Council has directed staff to enter into negotiations with the selected
consultant, staff and the consultant shall prepare a draft contract for approval by the
City Attorney and the Council. Once the contract is approved by the Council, the
contract will be signed by the consultant and the City and the terms of the contract will
commence.
♦ Submittal
An original and five (5) copies of your proposal (facsimile copies of the proposals will
not be accepted) should be submitted by:
5:30 P.M. on Monday, September 21, 1998
to the attention of: Bret B. Bernard, AICP
Director of Planning and Building Safety
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Telephone: (310) 322 -4670
Extension No. 382
Sincerely,
Bret B. Bernard, AICP
Director of Planning and Building Safety
DRAFT -
`j 0 j v - Page 5 of 5 -
P:\hannah\houseImt\IfP
Housina Element Uadate
RFP Consultant List
AC Martin Partners
811 West Seventh St.
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Ph #213 - 683 -1900
Berryman & Hennigar
1688 West Bernado Drive
San Diego, CA 92127
Ph #619 -451 -6100
Fax#619- 451 -1694
General Plan preparations and updates.
Calthorpe
739 Allston Way
Berkeley, CA 94710
Ph #510- 548 -6800
Fax #510- 548 -6848
CBA
747 E. Green Street, #300
Pasadena CA 91101 -2119
Ph #626 - 304 -0402
Fax#626- 304 -0402
General Plans for cities.
Connerly & Associates. Inc.
2215 — 21st Street
Sacramento, CA 95818
Ph #916 -456 -4784
Fax#916 -456 -7672
Culbertson. Adams & Associates
Planning Consultants
85 Argonaut, Suite 220
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
Ph #714 - 581 -2888
Fax#714- 581 -3599
'Or'86
Dyett & Bhatia
Urban and Regional Planners
70 Zone Street, Suite 100
San Francisco, CA 94107
Ph#415- 957 -2950
Fax#415- 543 -8957
Foothill Proiect Management
The Urban Design Center
117 -1/2 28" Street
Newport Beach, CA 92660
42 -274 Omar Place
Palm Desert, CA 92211
Ph #714 - 434 -9228
Ph #800 - 651 -6277
Sandra Genis
Planning Resources
1586 Myrtlewood Street
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Ph #714 - 754 -0814
Fax#714- 754 -0814
Gruen Associates
6330 San Vicente Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90048
Ph #213- 937 -4270
Fax#213- 937 -6001
J. Lawrence Mintier & Assiociates
1415 20th Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Ph #916- 446 -0522
Fax#916- 446 -7520
General Plan or specific plans
The Lightfoot Planning Group
702 Civic Center Drive
Oceanside, CA 92054
Ph #760 - 772 -1924
G 0158 '
Mooney & Associates
9903 Business Park Avenue
San Diego, CA 92131 -1120
Ph #619- 578 -8964
Fax#619- 578 -0573
bmooney @bfma.com
Takata Associates
600 Fremont Ave.
South Pasadena, CA 91030 -2528
Ph #818 - 799 -7187
Fax#818- 799 -5509
City general plans.
Templeton Planning Group
1470 Jamboree Rd., Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Ph #714- 474 -1660
Fax#714- 474 -2016
Thomas Cooke Associates
1944 Embarcadero
Oakland, CA 94606
Ph #510 - 437 -8099
Fax#510- 437 -8097
Urban Design Studio
14725 Alton Parkway
Irvine, CA 92618
Ph #714 - 472 -3505
Fax#714- 472 -8373
General plan elements.
Urban Team. The
4343 Crenshaw Blvd., Suite 302
Los Angeles, CA 90008
Ph #213- 291 -5755
Zucker Systems
1545 Hotel Circle South, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92108 -3415
Ph #619- 260 -2680
Fax#619- 260 -1138
General plans.
0 0'1318
p: hanna h\conslst.wpd
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent
AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Establishment of a professional services contract with MRH Structural Engineers for
professional plan checking services of structural and special high -rise construction projects on an "as- needed"
basis. The amount to be paid the Contractor under this agreement is estimated to exceed ten thousand dollars
($10,000); and, therefore requires City Council review and approval.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of the contract for MRH Structural Engineers.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The annual Professional Services Contract for plan checking services of
structural and special high -rise construction projects has been sent to the City Council on an annual basis for its
review and approval, given the potential amount, in excess of $10,000, that could be paid for service provision.
This year staff is asking Council for approval of a three year contract (instead of a one year contract), which would
run through the end of fiscal year 2000/01. The Director of Planning and Building Safety will evaluate our
consultant's performance at the end of the first and second fiscal year, and will provide a report of his findings to
the City Council. A 30 -day cancellation clause is included in the consultant's contract that will allow us to
terminate our professional relationship for any reason.
DISCUSSION: For at least the past 10 years, the Building Division has "outsourced" its plan checking
(Continued on next page)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Draft Professional Services Contract with MRH Structural Engineers
2. Copies of proposals for contract Plan Check Services from:
a. MRH Structural Engineers
b. Berryman & Henigar
c. Independent Code Consultants
d. JAS Pacific, Inc. Consulting Services
e. Hayer Consultants Incorporated
f. RSM & Associates, Inc.
g. International Conference of Building Officials
FISCAL IMPACT:
(Check one) Operating Budget X Capital Improv. Budget: _
Amount Requested: -0-
Project Account Budget: $133,500
Project/Account Balance: $133,500
Account Number: 3301 -6214
Project Phase: N/A
Appropriation Required - Yes No X
No impacts are anticipated to the City's General Fund. All monies expended are collected directly from project
applicants.
ORIGINATED: Date: 15 July 199ts
l
Bret B. Bernard, AIC , Di ctor f Planning and Building Safety
REVIEWED BY: , Date:
Ti rim ond, Interim C ana r
ACTION TAKEN:
DISCUSSION (Continued)
a;,� E -14
Page 2
responsibilities to a third party consultant on an "as needed" basis when the volume of plan submittals became
excessive, or for special high -rise or complex projects. This year, in addition to this current method of sending
technical and overflow plan reviews to the City's outside contract consultant, as noted at an earlier Council
meeting, Staff evaluated two additional ways that these services could be provided to our clients:
• Alternative 1: Bring in a plans examiner to provide services, as- needed, from a "temporary agency" such
as Willdan Associates.
The need for plan review services is intermittent; and as such, qualified plan review personnel may not be
readily available when such services are needed. The City cannot be guaranteed that the same plans
examiner would be available every time. Thus, additional staff time would be required to bring a new
plans examiner "up to speed" on a particular project, or on our methods of conducting business. When
field changes are requested, the original plans examiner could be working in another City, and therefore
not necessarily available to answer questions or perform the additional plan review. Costs for this service
are typically high. Willdan Associates, for example, charges $70.00 per hour for the use of one of their
plans examiners, as opposed to the fixed fee (42% of the plan check fee collected by the City) charged by
MRH Structural Engineers.
Alternative 2: Hire an additional plans examiner as a permanent employee to fill the position that was
eliminated (approximately) three years ago, on a part time and /or "as needed" basis.
As indicated during the City's budget sessions earlier this year, this plan is currently being evaluated. If
the anticipated level of building activity continues, this may be brought back as a formal proposal for the
City Council to consider for fiscal year 1998/99.
At this time, staff is recommending Council approval for the continued use of an independent plan review service
(as we have done for the number of years) to augment the City's in -house plan review services.
Staff Recommendation:
The Building Division is recommending contract approval to continue our "out- sourced" plan check services, now
with MRH Structural Engineers. Structural /architectural and specialized consultant services are provided for under
the Building Division line item 6214, "Professional /Technical Specialist ", in the recently adopted City budget.
The Building Safety Division has utilized the services of Mohammad Hariri, Structural Engineer, and Randy Harvill,
Architect, the two principal owners of MRH Structural Engineers, since the 1995/96 fiscal year in their previous
capacity as plans examiners with the City's previous Plan Review Consultant, The Compliance Group (who chose
not to submit a proposal this year). Their services have proven superior in every respect and it is recommended
that we renew this contract to allow continued excellent support to staff's plan checking efforts. (Letters of
commendation are available for review.) The plan check support provided by MRH Structural Engineers has
allowed us to quickly expedite the plan review process and has provided the City with convenience and
promptness in meeting time commitments to our clients, as set forth in our "Plan Check Performance Standards,"
and in our Department's Mission Statement.
Miscellaneous
Plan Review fees are established by City Resolution and are paid by the applicant at the time of plan check
submittal. Contract plan review services are provided by our Consultant on an "as- needed" basis. The City
receives a bill for actual services rendered on a monthly basis. This procedure has several advantages:
• There is no minimum number of plans that the City is required to send to our consultant.
• The Consultant is available for pre- construction or other design /construction related meetings, at no
additional charge to the City or to the Applicant.
• Certain projects can be expedited, as requested and paid for by the applicant.
• Additional expertise can be provided for certain complex projects.
u
Continued, Page 3
Additional plan review can be provided when a back -log occurs (as a result of the loss of two plans
examiner positions over the past several years).
Technical questions from our clients are handled directly by our Consultant, which minimizes
required City staff time.
After plans are reviewed by the consultant, they are sent to the architect/designer for corrections.
Corrected plans are subsequently returned to the City. The consultant's recheck of the revised
plans is at no additional charge to the City.
As always, this year's respondents were asked to provide rates for their services:
• MRH Structural Engineers has offered to provide plan review services for 42% of the plan check fee, with
an hourly rate of $60.00 per hour for miscellaneous projects.
• Berryman & Henigar proposes to provide services for 69% of the plan review fee for projects valued
greater than $500,000 and for 59% of the plan review fee for projects valued less than $500,000.
• Independent Code consultants proposes to provide plan review services for 65% of the plan check fee
collected by the City.
• JAS Pacific, Inc. Consulting Services proposes to provide plan review services for 49% of the plan check
fee collected by the City.
• Hayer Consultants Incorporated has offered to provide plan review services for 50% of the plan check fee
collected by the City.
• RSM & Associates, Inc. provided us with a competitive bid by charging 52% of the Building Permit fee
collected by the City. However, they do not carry the $1,000,000 Errors and Omissions insurance as
required by the City's standard contract agreement, and therefore, they were disqualified.
• International Conference of Building Officials provided us with a competitive bid of 50% of the Building
Permit fee collected by the City. However, they have up to a 4 week plan check turn - around time; they do
not pick -up and deliver plans; they do not provide accelerated plan services; and their plan review staff is
not available for pre- construction meetings (or other design or construction related meetings).
• The Compliance Group did not respond to our (repeated) request for proposals.
• George Boghossian and Associates Plan Review Services did not respond to our request for proposals.
Staff is recommending that the professional services contract for the City of El Segundo be awarded to MRH
Structural Engineers based upon:
• Prior El Segundo Experience — The principal owners of MRH Structural Engineers have provided
architectural and engineering plan review services to the City (as contract employees for the
Compliance Group) for the past 3 years. They are well like and respected within our Department
and our Community.
• Compatibility — The principal owners of MRH Structural Engineers are familiar with the City's plan
review process as well as the people who make our system work.
• Accessibility — Past experience with the principal owners of MRH Structural Engineers has proven
that they are accessible by phone, cellular phone and via internet access. They have always
expressed a willingness to meet with the design community, especially during the pre- construction
phrase of a project.
• Low Bid — Although MRH's bid is slightly higher than that submitted by the International Conference
of Building Officials, this is more than offset by MRH's ability to provide plan review services in less
than Y2 the time, as well as their ability to provide accelerated plan review services, to meet with our
clients here at City Hall, and their timely response to any of this Department's plan checking needs.
Three Year Contract
This year staff is asking that the Professional Services Contract be approved for three years (instead of a one year
contract) to run through fiscal year 2000/01. The Director of Planning and Building Safety will provide the City
Council with a brief written evaluation (receive and file) of the Consultant's performance at the end of fiscal year
1998/99, and at the end of fiscal year 1999/00. This Report will contain an evaluation of the consultant's services
through the preceding twelve months with a recommendation to extend, or not to extend, the contract for the
following year.
GO0,'
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 18 day of August 1998, between
the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and
the MRH Structural Engineers., hereinafter referred to as "Consultant ". In consideration of
the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform the services set forth
in Exhibit A, "SCOPE OF SERVICES," and made a part hereof. Consultant represents and
warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to properly perform said
services in a thorough, competent and professional manner and shall, at all times during
the term of this Agreement, have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law.
Consultants shall begin its services under this Agreement on August 19, 1998. Consultant
shall complete each of the services set forth in Exhibit A to the City's satisfaction. If the
City is not satisfied with any such services, the Consultant shall work on such matter until
the City approves of the service. Further, Consultant shall complete the services set forth
in Exhibit A strictly according to the schedule provided therein.
2. STATUS OF CONSULTANT. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as
to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under
this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive
NAAGREEMNT.MST -1-
il0 .4
direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have
control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or
agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any
manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner
officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to
incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
Consultant shall not disseminate any information or reports gathered or created pursuant
to this Agreement without the prior written approval of City except information or reports
required by government agencies to enable Consultant to perform its duties under this
Agreement.
3. CONSULTANT'S KNOWLEDGE OF APPLICABLE LAWS. Consultant shall
keep itself informed of applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations which may
affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its services pursuant
to this Agreement. Consultant shall observe and comply with all such laws and regulations
affecting its employees. City and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or
in equity as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section.
4. PERSONNEL. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the
stability and continuity of Consultant's staff assigned to perform the services hereunder and
shall obtain the approval of the City Manager of all proposed staff members performing
services under this Agreement prior to any such performance.
NAAGREEMNT.MST
0 r)
5. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. Compensation to the
Consultant shall be as set forth in Exhibit A , "FEES ", hereto and made a part hereof.
Payments shall be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of each invoice as to all non-
disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to
Consultant in 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
6. ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANT. Consultant shall not be
compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this
Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein or listed in Exhibit A, "Fees ",
unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City
Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and
in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written
authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services.
7. ASSIGNMENT. All services required hereunder shall be performed by
Consultant, its employees or personnel under direct contract with Consultant. Consultant
shall not assign to any subcontractor the performance of this Agreement, nor any part
thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written consent of City Manager.
8. FACILITIES AND RECORDS.
Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales,
N:IAGREEMNT.MST
(,;�C!�
=19
costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate
records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such
records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access
to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and
records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit
City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work,
data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records,
together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years
after receipt of final payment.
9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement will terminate on or
before June 30, 2001. The Director of Planning and Building Safety will provide the City
Council with a brief written evaluation (receive and file) of the Consultant's performance
at the end of fiscal year 1998/99, and at the end of fiscal year 1999/00. This report will
contain an evaluation of the consultant's services through the preceding twelve months
with a recommendation to extend, or not to extend, the contract for the following year.
10. COOPERATION BY CITY. All public information, data, reports, records, and
maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for
carrying out the work as outlined in the Scope of Services, shall be furnished to Consultant
N:IAGREEMNT.MST - 4 -
�Cr,,j
in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the work to be performed under
this Agreement.
11. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the
event of termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original maps,
models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer
files, files and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall, become the sole property of City. With
respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable
written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes
of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION /CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
(a) All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior
written authorization excepting that information which is a public record and subject to
disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, Government Code 6250, et seq.
Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily
provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to
interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement
or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or
N:WGREEMNT.MST -5-
00'0106-
court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of
such court order or subpoena.
If Consultant or any of its officers, employees, consultants or subcontractors does
voluntarily provide information in violation of this Agreement, City has the right to reim-
bursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages caused by Consultant's
conduct, including the City's attorney's fees.
Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees,
agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other
discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and
the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the
City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and /or be present
at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with
City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests
provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply
or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
(b) Consultant covenants that neither they nor any officer or principal of their firm
have any interest in, or shall they acquire any interest, directly or indirectly which will
conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of their services hereunder.
NAAGREEMNT.MST
. 0 r,
Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having
such interest shall be employed by them as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor
without the express written consent of the City Manager.
13. DEFAULT. In the event that Consultant is in default of any provision of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for
any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately
by written notice to the Consultant.
14. INDEMNIFICATION.
(a) Consultant represents it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to
perform the services and duties agreed to hereunder by Consultant, and City relies upon
the skills and knowledge of Consultant. Consultant shall perform such services and duties
consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals
performing similar service in the State of California.
(b) Consultant is an independent contractor and shall have no authority to bind
City nor to create or incur any obligation on behalf of or liability against City, whether by
contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this agreement
or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. City, its elected and appointed
officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers (individually and collectively,
"Indemnitees ") shall have no liability to Consultant or to any other person for, and
WAGREEMNT.MST
;0 005
Consultant shall indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless the Indemnitees from and
r
against, any and all liabilities, claims, actions, causes of action, proceedings, suits,
damages, judgments, liens, levies, costs and expenses of whatever nature, including
reasonable attorneys' fees and disbursements (collectiyol y "Claims "), which the
Indemnitees may suffer or incur or to which the Indemnities may become subject by
reason of or arising out of any injury to or death of any pers n(s), damage to property, loss
of use of property, economic loss or otherwise occurring s a result of or allegedly caused
by the performance or failure to perform by Consultant f Consultant's services under this
agreement or the negligent or willful acts or omission of Consultant, its agents, officers,
directors or employees, in performing any of the se
If any action or proceeding is brought agai
ces under this agreement.
the Indemnitees by reason of any of
the matters against which Consultant has agreed to indemnify the Indemnitees as above
provided, Consultant, upon notice from the CITY, shall defend the Indemnitees at
Consultant's expense by counsel acceptable o the City. The Indemnitees need not have
first paid any of the matters as to which the ndemnitees are entitled to indemnity in order
to be so indemnified. The insurance re uired to be maintained by Consultant under
paragraph 15 shall ensure Consultant's bligations under this paragraph 14(b), but the
limits of such insurance shall not limit t
of this paragraph 14(b) shall survive the
liability of Consultant hereunder. The provisions
ration or earlier termination of this agreement.
The Consultant's indemnification' does not extend to Claims occurring as a result of
N:IAGREEMNT.MST
00092
the City's negligent or willful acts or omissions.
t
15. INSURANCE.
A. Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall provide and maintain
insurance acceptable to the City Attorney in full force and effect throughout the term of this
Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise
from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its
i
agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is td be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than ANIL Consultant shall provide the following
scope and limits of insurance:
broad as:
(1) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as
(a) Insurance Se
Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001).
(b) Insurance
1/87) covering Automobile Liability, including
or equivalent forms subject to the written app
(c)
NAAGREEMNT.MST
�OIU�J
Workers' Co
ISIM,
Office form Commercial General
ices Office form number CA 0001 (Ed.
1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025,
I of the City.
n insurance as required by the
Labor Code of State of California and Employer's Liability insuran and covering all
persons providing services on behalf of the Consultant and all risks to such persons under
this Agreement.
(d) Errors and omissions liability i�surance appropriate to
the Consultant's profession.
(2)
of insurance no less than:
Minimum Limits of Insurance. c0sultant shall maintain limits
(a) General Liability: $1�00,000 per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury and property damage. If Com
other form with a general aggregate limit is used, ei
apply separately to the activities related to this Ag
shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(b) Automobile
injury and property damage.
General Liability Insurance or
r the general aggregate limit shall
nt or the general aggregate limit
lity: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily
(c) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability:
Workers' Compensation as required by t e Labor Code of the State of California and
Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 p r accident.
(d) Errors land Omissions Liability: $1,000,000 per
N:u1GREEMNT.MST -10-
occurrence.
B Other Provisions. Insurance policies requir by this Agreement shall
contain the following provisions:
(1) All Policies. Each insurance po icy required by this paragraph
15 shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be uspended, voided, canceled by
the insurer or either party to this Agreement, reduced i coverage or in limits except after
30 days' prior written notice by Certified mail, return r(�ceipt requested, has been given to
the City.
,r
(2) General Liability and
(a) City, its officer , officials, and employees and volunteers
are to be covered as additional insureds as espects: liability arising out of activities
Consultant performs, products and complete operations of Consultant; premises owned,
occupied or used by Consultant, or automo iles owned, leased or hired or borrowed by
Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to City, its officers, officials, or a ployees.
(b) Consu ant's insurance coverage shall be primary
insurance as respect to City, its offic rs, officials, employees and volunteers. Any
insurance or self insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees or
N:IAGREEMNT.MST -11-
r
U J
volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, C�bnsultant's insurance.
(c) Consultant's insurance all apply separately to each
insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, a ept with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
(d) Any failure to
provisions of the policies including breaches of
provided to the City, its officers, officials, employ
(3) Workers' Comoe
ply with the reporting or other
rranties shall not affect coverage
es or volunteers.
Liabili
Unless the City Manager otherwise agrees i writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all
rights of subrogation against City, its office s, officials, employees and agents for losses
arising from work performed by Consulta t for City.
C. Other Re uiremen s. Consultant agrees to deposit with City, at or
before the effective date of this contra ,certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City
that the insurance provisions of this c ntract have been complied with. The City Attorney
may require that Consultant furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting
coverage required by this Section. he certificates and endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right
to inspect complete, certified copi s of all required insurance policies, at any time.
N:VIGREEMNT.MST 1
"010
(1) Consultant shall furnish certificates and endorsements from
each subcontractor identical to those Consultant provides.
(2) Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to
and approved by City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate
such deductibles or self- insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment
of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims.
(3) The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance
shall not be construed to limit Consultant's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the
indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement.
16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement is the complete, final, entire
and exclusive expression of the Agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes
any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to
the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no
representations by any party which are not embodied herein and that no other agreement,
statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding.
17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree
W AGREEMNT.MST -13-
11010
that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and
liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this
Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the Los Angeles
County Superior Court.
18. ASSIGNMENT OR SUBSTITUTION. City has an interest in the
qualifications of and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and
obligations imposed upon Consultant by this Agreement. In recognition of that interest,
neither any complete nor partial assignment of this Agreement may be made by Consultant
nor changed, substituted for, deleted, or added to without the prior written consent of City.
Any attempted assignment or substitution shall be ineffective, null, and void, and
constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law
or in equity, including summary termination of this Agreement.
19. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. The terms of this Agreement can
only be modified in writing approved by the City Council and the Consultant. The parties
agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and any attempted
waiver shall be void.
20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE. The person or persons executing this
Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he /she /they has /have the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of his /her /their corporation and warrants and
NAAGREEMNT.MST
U0105
represents that he /she /they has /have the authority to bind Consultant to the performance
of its obligations hereunder.
21. TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. This agreement may be
terminated by the City, with or without cause, at any time. Notice to terminate this
agreement shall be given in writing.
22. NOTICES. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by
personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited
in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows:
Cam.
Attention: Bret B. Bernard
Department of Planning and Building Safety
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, California 90245
Telephone (310) 322 -4670, extension 211
Facsimile (310) 322 -4167
Consultant.
Attention: Mohammad Hariri,
MRH Structural Engineers
22640 Golden Springs Drive, Unit B
Diamond Bar, California 91765
Telephone (909) 860 -1706
Facsimile (909) 396 -8655
WAGREEMNT.MST
60106
The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal
service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United
States Postal Service.
23. SEVERABILITY. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of
this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of the other provisions of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHERE OF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
By
Title
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
By
Title
ATTEST:
Cindy Mortesen
City Clerk
N:WGREEMNT.MST
6010
-16-
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
X4 I--,
ark D. Hensley
City Attorney
Exhibit A
August 18, 1998
MRH Structural Engineers
Scope of Services
MRH Structural Engineers shall perform the following professional services when
requested by the Director of Planning and Building Safety of the City of El Segundo:
• Provide thorough quality code compliance plan reviews according to all adopted and
legislated codes and regulations to include reviews of construction documents
submitted to the City for:
1. Building Permits
2. Mechanical Permits
3. Electrical Permits
4. Plumbing Permits
5. Grading Permits
6. Non - building structures Permits
The above reviews shall include:
1. Analysis of all engineering calculations
2. Evaluation of all technical engineering reports
3. Review of other specifications or documents
• Coordination and integration of all separate permits for each project
• Advise and consult with the Director of Planning and Building Safety, or staff, regarding
potentially unsafe conditions shown or not shown within plans that may not be
specifically covered by the Code. Provide recommendations for discretionary decisions
that must be made by the Director of Planning and Building Safety
• Advise and consult with the Director of Planning and Building safety, or staff, regarding
issues of conflicts between adopted Codes and unadopted or other legislated Codes
and regulations
• Provide the applicant and the City clear and comprehensive corrections lists with
deficient items referred to specific Code sections to ensure understanding, reduce
project conflicts and resubmissions, and speed the approval process
• Provide review, consultation, and corrections follow -up service for each project through
final approval. Approval will be by MRH or the City staff at the City's option
• Review plans and related documents in an average 10 working days
• Review accelerated plans and documents within an average of 5 working days
• Attend all per - submittal meeting or discussions requested by the City of El Segundo
• Meet with applicants at City offices, or Consultants office, with reasonable notice
• Be available to the City and the applicants, Monday through Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to
5:30 p.m., and occasionally on the weekend, as required
• Return phone calls within 4 hours
• Fax plan check correction to the applicants when requested by the City of El Segundo
�Oi 08
Exhibit A
MRH Structural Engineers
August 18, 1998
Page 2 _
Fees
• Plan Review: For permit applications where fees are based on project valuation, MRH
Structural Engineers shall provide the above service for 42% of the total plan check
fees received by the City for each application reviewed, including accelerated fees and
any final adjustments due to changes in valuation
• Hourly Reviews: For permit applications and follow -up on field change submittals
where fees are not based on project, aluation, MRH shall provide the above services
for an hourly rate of $60.00 per ho -jr
• Additional Services: For additiona; serviqes not described above, upon request and
confirmation of available personnel, MRH Structural Engineers shall provide additional =
services at hourly rates to be agreed upon for each request
• MRH Structural Engineers shall keep an accurate daily record of time worked on all =
hourly and accelerated projects and shall make it immediately available to the City,
upon request
• MRH Structural Engineers shall not charge the City for the time to pick -up or deliver
documents, or, travel time to and from meetings
MRH Structural Engineers will bill the City within thirty (30) days from the completion of
each task.
z
s
.ti
u0�,�
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Revised class specification and resolution establishing a new monthly salary range for the job classification of
Community Cable Program Supervisor. Fiscal Impact: Funding for the adjusted salary range is included in the Fiscal
Year 1998 -99 Operating Budget.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Approve Class Specification
2. Adopt Resolution
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
At its June 16, 1998 meeting, City Council directed staff to increase the annual compensation for the job classification
of Community Cable Program Supervisor. The compensation adjustment was designed to reflect additional duties
and responsibilities falling within the scope of the incumbent's position. The attached class specification reflects the
added duties and responsibilities.
DISCUSSION:
The Community Cable Program Supervisor's position has significantly changed in three areas. With the expansion
of cable services, this position takes on the expanded role of training and supervising a significant increase in staff,
Including full -time personnel.
The position has also taken on the task of administering the City's Community Cable Franchise Agreement and
working closely with Time Warner Communications.
The third area of increased responsibility is staying current and knowledgeable of changes taking place in the cable
television industry.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Class Specification and Resolution
FISCAL IMPACT:
(Check one) Operating Budget:_ Capital Improv. Budget:
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance: Date: 7/1/98
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required - Yes_ Nom_
ORIGINATED: Date: July 31, 1998
Jim F uk, Director of R ation and Parks
Bob Hyland, Director of Hu Resources /Risk Management
REVIEWED BY: Date:
Interim C
Cage
U 1 i
,VI-OPR
E -15
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL
SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SALARY RANGE FOR
THE JOB CLASSIFICATION OF COMMUNITY CABLE PROGRAM
SUPERVISOR
The City Council of the City of El Segundo does hereby resolve, declare, determine, and
order as follows:
SECTION 1. That the City Council approves the following basic monthly salary range for
the job classification of Community Cable Program Supervisor (Supervisory and Professional Employees
Association Bargaining Unit):
STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
$4057.79 $4260.68 $4373.71 $4697.40 $4932.27
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution;
shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the
minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1998.
Mike Gordon, Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole
number of members of the City Council of the City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was
duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and
attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18`h day of
August, 1998, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. H nsley, ity Attorne
RES- SLRV.290
u0i .1
Date Adopted:
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
COMMUNITY CABLE PROGRAM SUPERVISOR
Under general supervision, administrates the City's Community Cable Franchise Agreement; supervises and
trains full -time staff; works with community groups and organizations; stays current and knowledgeable of
technological changes in the delivery of quality programs; plans, directs, and coordinates the operations of
the City's cable television channel; provides staff support to the Cable TV Advisory Committee; assesses and
responds to community programming needs; performs related duties as required.
EXAMPLES OF DUTIES
Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Plans, directs, and coordinates the operations of the City's cable television channel, including
scheduling, traffic, publicity, and programming.
2. Establishes and maintains liaison with the Cable TV Advisory Committee national cable organizations,
cable companies, production vendors, other government agencies, and the public relating to the cable
channel; responds to and addresses public inquiries and complaints.
3. Consults with and provides technical support to other City departments and community organizations
on cable production issues.
4. Supervises and participates in programming activities to ensure quality and compliance with FCC
regulations; approves all program treatments, scripts, materials, equipment, crew assignment and
public access use.
5. Prepares production activity and other reports related to cable channel operations and State and
Federal requirements; conducts community surveys and needs assessments regarding programming.
6. Recommends broadcasting policies, procedures, and standards.
7. Develops and assists in the administration of the budget for the cable television channel.
8. Supervises the installation, repair, and maintenance of production equipment.
9. Recommends equipment selection for the cable television production facility.
10. Recruits, trains, assigns and schedules production staff.
QUALIFICATIONS GUIDELINES
Education and /or Experience
Any combination of education and /or experience that has provided the knowledge, skills, and abilities
necessary for satisfactory job performance. Example combinations include a four -year degree with a major
in Telecommunications or a related field, and three years responsible experience in the production, direction,
and administration of cable television operations, including or supplemented by two years supervisory
experience.
COMMUNITY CABLE PROGRAM SUPERVISOR
Page 2
Thorough knowledge of principles and techniques of long and short -range television programming; sources
of public television programs; structure and operations of a cable television system. Considerable knowledge
of FCC rules and regulations pertaining to system operations. Working knowledge of the principles and
practices of budget preparation; principles of supervision. Ability to direct the operation of the cable television
channel in accordance with related regulations and City policies; establish and maintain broadcasting
standards; analyze organizational, administrative, and technical problems and adopt effective courses of
action; develop and implement effective program procedures; research and develop program ideas and
concepts; communicate effectively both orally and in writing; establish and maintain cooperative working
relationships.
Possession of or ability to obtain a Class C California driver's license and a satisfactory driving record.
Possession of a teaching credential is desired.
hAWPd0C5%dspeodgty- *PV.wpd
0 ll
i
EL SEGbNDO CITY COUNCIL
A(�---NDA ITEM STATEMENT
AGENDA D
MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar
Proposed class specification for the new Mid - Management job classification of Business Services Manager and a
Resolution increasing the basic monthly salary range by 5 %. Fiscal Impact: Funding for the one - position job
classification is contained in the Fiscal Year 1998/99 Operating Budget.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Approve Class Specification
2. Adopt Resolution
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The City's recently adopted 1998/99 Fiscal Year Budget reflects the reclassification of the incumbent occupying the
job classification of Budget Analyst/Accountant to the job classification of Business Services Manager. The job
classification has also been reallocated from the Supervisory and Professional Employees Association to our group
of Mid- Management/Confidential employees.
DISCUSSION:
City Council approval of the proposed class specification is required in order to formally complete the establishment
of the new job classification. Council previously approved the basic monthly salary range, $4716 - $5732, at its
meeting of July 7, 1998.
Adoption of the proposed resolution will provide for a 5% increase to the monthly salary range. This job classification
was inadvertently omitted in prior City Manager Morrison's listing of proposed salary adjustments for unrepresented
Executive Management and Mid- Management/Confidential job classification, also agendized at Council's July 7, 1998
meeting. Those increases ranged from 2% to 6% and were approved by action of the City Council.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Class Specification
Resolution
FISCAL IMPACT:
(Check one) Operating Budget: X Capital Improv. Budget:
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance: Date:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required - Yes_ No X
ORIGINATED: Date: August b, IMS
Bob Hyland, Director of Human esources /Risk Management
REVIEWED BY: Date:
Ti rim ond, Interim City M ager 4;6/Vr
ACTION TAKEN:
agenda.292 E-16
0011 ge - -Z9� - 0 0/
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL
SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE TO CHAPTER
1A2 (MANAGEMENT - CONFIDENTIAL SERIES) OF THE EL SEGUNDO
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
WHEREAS, Executive Management and Mid- Management/Confidential level positions are reviewed
from time to time by the City Council for possible adjustments to salaries and /or benefits;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Sections 1A2.000 and 1A2.010 of the El Segundo Administrative Code, entitled "Schedule
of Classes by Series" and "Basic Salary Schedule" respectively, shall be modified to reflect, effective July 4,
1998, a salary range adjustment as follows:
1. A salary range adjustment of 5% for Business Services Manager.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter the
same in the book of original Resolutions of said City, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption
thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which
the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August 1998.
Mike Gordon, Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number
of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly
passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by
the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18`h day of August, 1998, and
the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
resslry5tsm
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. Hensley, City Atorney
0 011 1�7-) # . g - 0-� qOq- 00 �k
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
BUSINESS SERVICES MANAGER
DEFINITION
DATE ADOPTED:
Under general supervision, coordinates and facilitates the preparation of the City's preliminary and annual
operating budgets; assists departments in budget implementation and administration activities throughout the
year; plans, organizes and directs the Citywide acquisition of supplies, materials, equipment and services;
coordinates and manages the activities of the Business Services Division of the Finance Department in the
collection and payment of business licenses and filming permits; performs related duties as required.
CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
This single - position class is assigned the responsibility to direct the work of division staff; coordinate and
facilitate the compilation and formulation activities involved in the City's preliminary and annual operating
budgets; the purchasing of materials, supplies and services necessary for proper operation of the City's
activities; and the operation and administration of billing and collecting of revenues associated with business
licenses and filming permits.
EXAMPLES OF DUTIES
Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following:
Coordinates and facilitates the compilation and formulation activities involved in the preparation of
the City's preliminary and annual budgets;
2. Serves as liaison to all departments during the preparation of the preliminary and annual budgets and
provides technical information and assistance to department directors, managers and support staff;
coordinates the orientation and training of operating department staff involved in budget preparation
activities; works closely with department staff to insure adherence to established budget preparation
guidelines and parameters.
3. Recommends and assists in the implementation of new or revised accounting systems, procedures
and records; may participate in the development of computer programs for various accounting
analyses; provides for parallel testing and implementation of computer systems.
4. As a project leader, supervises and reviews the work of fiscal and clerical personnel in performing
data entry, reconciliations, and other financial record keeping work.
5. Directs the purchase of requisite materials, supplies and equipment to meet the requirements of
operating departments of the City; insures cooperative working relationships between major vendors
and City departments; oversees the disposal or sale of excess inventories of purchased materials and
supplies; maximizes utilization of cooperative purchasing to obtain lower prices through volume
purchasing; may make site visits to assess planned needs or resolve problems with installed
products; attends demonstrations, bid openings and meetings in and outside the City.
J01 1.6
6. Supervises revenue collectors and clerical employees involved in the billing and collection of business
license fees and filming permits, determining work procedures, assigning duties, training staff,
enforcing City regulations and policies, and promoting work efficiency; works with the City Attorney
to interpret the Municipal Code in daily operating procedures; coordinates bringing delinquent
business license accounts into compliance and making payment arrangements with businesses
where appropriate.
Education and/or Experience
Any combination of education and /or experience that has provided the knowledge, skills, and abilities
necessary for satisfactory job performance. Example combinations include completion of a four -year college
curriculum or equivalent in business administration, accounting, or related field, and four years of professional
experience in municipal budgeting, financial analysis, and /or purchasing, including at least one year in a
supervisory capacity.
Knowledge, Skills and Abilities
Considerable knowledge of municipal budgeting and purchasing, and applicable laws, ordinances, regulations
and policies governing the accounting and budgetary management of the City; data processing applications
and systems related to municipal budgeting and accounting operations, procedures and practices; modern
office practices, procedures, methods and equipment; personnel supervision and training. Ability to
effectively coordinate and facilitate the preparation of the City's preliminary and annual budgets; perform a
wide variety of professional budgeting analysis work; analyze data and draw logical conclusions; direct the
activities of assigned staff-, prepare and maintain accurate reports and records; communicate effectively both
orally and in writing; establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with department directors,
managers and support staff; learn new computer software applications and procedures and identify
enhancements to existing systems.
Special Requirements
Possession of or ability to obtain a Class C California driver's license and a satisfactory driving record.
h: \wpdocs\cls- specs \finance\bus- srvs.mgr
x; 0 4 17 le. -C;k(7c�- no((
1
J MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
EL SEPUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Proposed Resolution of the City Council of the City of El Segundo, California, providing a 2% salary increase for
the City's part -time temporary employees. Fiscal Impact: $12,630 annualized cost. Funding for the increase is
contained in the City's 1998 -99 Fiscal Year Operating Budget.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Adopt Resolution
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The City Council periodically reviews and adjusts hourly pay rates for our approximately 150 part -time employees.
The last across - the -board increase for this group of unrepresented employees was 1.64% in August 1995.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed 2% salary increase will be effective August 15, 1998. One half of one percent of the proposed
adjustment would be used to fund the part -time employees participation in the State Disability Insurance (SDI)
Program. Coverage under SDI provides valuable protection again off - the -job injuries, illnesses and disabling
conditions.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Resolution
FISCAL IMPACT:
(Check one) Operating Budget: X Capital Improv. Budget:
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance: Date:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required - Yes_ No X _
ORIGINATED: Date: August 6, 1998
Bob Hyland, Director of Huma ources /Risk Management
REVIEWED BY: Date:
Interim City anager
T
agenda.291
0 0i1.:
E -17
#le- � 9 / - 00 /
ATTACHMENT "A"
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PART-TIME AND TEMPORARY PERSONNEL
BASE WAGE & CLASSIFICATION TITLE
2% SALARY INCREASE
Effective 8/15/98
Owages.898
!,I
U 0 11 <.{ i�� -�'9/ -06�-
$8.94
$7.41
$8.15
Administrative Intern
Crossing Guard
$8.31
$8.72
$9.16
Duplicating Equipment Operator
$13.95
n/a
n/a
Library Page
$6.19
$6.82
$7.51
Lifeguard
$8.73
$9.62
$10.58
Locker Room Attendant (Pool)
$5.81
$6.40
$7.04
Office Aide
$6.03
$6.67
$7.35
Playback Operator
$5.87
$6.40
$7.04
Pool Manager
$14.28
$14.99
$15.75
Rangemaster
$20.40
n/a
n/a
Recording Secretary
$14.28
$15.86
$17.45
Recreation Leader
$5.81
$6.40
$7.03
Recreation Specialist I
$6.87
$7.56
8.304
Recreation Specialist 11
$8.30
$9.14
$10.05
Recreation Specialist 111
$11.92
$12.76
$13.67
Swim Instructor
$9.57
$10.53
$11.58
Video Specialist 1
$7.19
$7.9 2
$8.71
Video Specialist 11
$8.73
$9.61
.57
$10:::]
Owages.898
!,I
U 0 11 <.{ i�� -�'9/ -06�-
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL
SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR CHANGES TO CHAPTER
IA3 (GENERAL GOVERNMENT SERIES) OF THE EL SEGUNDO
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
WHEREAS, part-time temporary job classification are reviewed periodically for possible adjustments
to salaries.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 1A3.020 of the El Segundo Administrative Code, entitled "Part-Time Temporary
Personnel', shall be modified as shown on Attachment 1, to reflect a 2% salary increase for all employees
effective August 15, 1998.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter
the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption
thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which
the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 181h day of August 1998.
Mike Gordon, Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number
of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed
and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City
Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18`h day of August, 1998, and the same
was so passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
AP ROV AS T FORM:
Mark He sley, City Attorney
res2cptr.1 a3
y2- a -i-o0__�5
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Request for Proposal (RFP) to Update City Circulation Element.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Approve the RFP and authorize staff to solicit proposals.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
The present Circulation Element was adopted as part of the City's General Plan in 1992. The traffic data
utilized in the development of the Circulation Element was collected in 1988. Since the adoption of the General
Plan, staff has received numerous inquiries as to appropriateness of the Element. As a result, funding for the
update of the Circulation Element was included in the 1997/98 budget.
DISCUSSION:
This item was originally presented to the City Council at its meeting of May 19, 1998. At that time, the item was
referred back to staff to ensure that the Economic Development Advisory Council (EDAC) was involved in the
process. The EDAC discussed the item at their June 23, 1998 meeting (see attached minutes).
(Discussion continues on next page....)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Request for Proposal to Update City of El Segundo Circulation Element.
2. Minutes of Economic Development Advisory Council held June 23, 1998.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget:
Capital Improvement Budget:
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required:
Yes
$45,000-00
$45.000.00 Date: May 6. 1998
2701 -6214
Approve RFP
No
ORIGINATED: Date:
Eduard Schroder, Di of Public Works
7/ R Date: 8/11/98
Page 1 of 2
U 0 k 2! NACOUNCILTW-AUG18.06 (Tuesday8/11/989: E -18
DISCUSSION: (continued)
The attached RFP is the same as previously submitted to Council except that the dates have changed as
follows:
• Proposals due
• Selection of consultant team, finalize contract
• Project initiation
• General Plan Update Ad Hoc Committee Meetings/
Workshops and preparation of Element
• Draft Circulation Element
• Planning Commission hearings
• City Council hearings
• Final adoption
September 22. 1998
October 20, 1998
November 1. 1998
January-
February 1999
March 1999
May 1999
July 1999
August 1999
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached RFP and authorize staff to solicit proposals.
Page 2 of 2
O 1 N: \C0UNCIL \PW- AUG18.06 (Tuesday 10/11/98 9:00 AM)
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
To Update
City of El Segundo Circulation Element
August 18, 1998
This is a Request for Proposal (RFP) to update the City of El Segundo's Circulation and related
Elements of the General Plan and prepare a supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
BACKGROUND
The last update to the Circulation Element occurred in 1992. Since that time, changes have
occurred in local state congestion and transportation planning practices. These changes include
changes to the projected levels of service and traffic volumes, and changes in regional transportation
requirements (e.g., the Congestion Management Plan (CMP)).
The process for updating the Circulation Element Update will include the assistance of an
experienced, innovative consulting firm or team selected by the City to provide technical expertise,
participate in the public process, and prepare the update of the Element. The City expects that the
update will require a team with experience in preparing circulation elements and in public facilitation
of meetings. The consultant team will report directly to the City staff in preparing the update.
The public input process will be an important component of the update. City staff will assist the
consultant in organizing the public process, with outreach to encourage the participation of
neighborhood organizations, City residents, the Chamber of Commerce, the business community,
and others interested parties. City staff and the consultant will be active participants in the public
meetings with the Planning Commission, City Council and the public.
Proposals for the update to the Circulation Element are due on Tuesday, September 22, 1998, by
5:00 p.m., in the El Segundo City Clerk's Office.
It. SCOPE OF WORK
The intent of the update is to produce the Circulation Element, and other related Elements for
internal consistency, and a Supplemental EIR. Policies should be oriented towards a well balanced,
coordinated transportation system that reduces dependence upon the automobile while still providing
access for residents, employees, and visitors to the City. The Circulation Element should set out
goals and policies which will provide for alternative forms of transportation including, but not limited
to, bicycle, pedestrian and transit facilities, while remaining sensitive to impacts in the residential
neighborhoods, business areas, and accounting for the impact of new development on the
community.
U012I.
N: \RFP'S \CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98)
Specifically, the update to the Circulation Element should consider revising or creating goals,
policies and objectives, covering the following areas:
• Auto, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit policies
• Regional transportation opportunities
• Truck routes
• Parking
• Acceptable levels of service
• New technology, including "smart shuttles" and "smart streets"
• Alternative fuels
• Transportation management to account for opportunities beyond the City's
Transportation Systems (TSM) and Demand (TDM) Management Ordinances.
• Neighborhood traffic control
• Potential for new transit services, including shuttle programs
• Analysis of accessibility to transportation for City residents, including low income,
elderly and disabled persons
• Complete update of maps, including major circulation proposals, functional
classification of streets, public transportation and bicycle routes
• Financing and Implementation Plan
• Preparation of a Supplemental EIR and all related notices and documentation. The
consultant team selected to prepare the update will be required to prepare an initial
study including providing fact -based explanations to support responses to all items
on the checklist as part of the preparation of the EIR once the documentation
components of the Circulation Element are better known.
• Other tasks as may be recommended by the consultant in the proposal and as further
refined by City staff.
In addition, the Element should focus on transportation issues with other South Bay Cities Council
of Governments ( SBCCOG) cities as part of the Regional Comprehensive Plan with the Southern
California Association of Governments (SCAG). Work by the SBCCOG and SCAG should be
analyzed for applicability to the Circulation Element.
The update to the Circulation Element does not include any major changes to the Land Use Element
of the General Plan. However, the Circulation Element should incorporate policies consistent with
the Land Use and other Elements of the General Plan. Other Elements will also require updating
as necessary for internal consistency.
NARFP'S \CELEMENT.UP (8111/98) 2
11
01
The update should include an Implementation Plan which translates the policies into actions, sets
a time frame for these actions to occur and discusses financing opportunities.
!!! TASKS
Prepare and draft Circulation Element in compliance with Section 65302(b) of the State Government
Code. The Element shall address the extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares in
relationship with the City's Capital Improvement Program, transportation route and modes.
The following sub -tasks shall be conducted to determine street configuration and capacity::
• Identify all streets and their classification (existing and proposed).
• Develop description for each street classification.
• Address impacts and mitigation measures regarding high volume traffic flow, parking
and access as it relates to response of emergency equipment and vehicles.
• Review relevant circulation studies and recent data from all sources.
• Document the general location and extent of all transportation routes and facilities.
• Document the existing traffic volumes -to- capacity on major roadways within and
adjacent to the City.
• Document existing lane configurations, right -of -way widths, roadway capacities level
of service (LOS), traffic control devices, speed limits, truck routes, bus routes
(Torrance Transit, MTA, MAX Transit System and Dial -A- Ride), bicycle routes and
pedestrian routes both existing and proposed.
• Identify projected roadway deficiencies and recommend improvements attainable
within the next 20 years. Those outside the scope of the General Plan should also
be considered. Identify possibilities for synchronization of traffic signals.
• Evaluate feasibility of eliminating existing Nash /Douglas one -way couplet and return
streets to two -way traffic.
• Re- evaluate benefit of street extensions (including but not limited to Grand Avenue,
Nash Street, and Mariposa Avenue) identified in present Circulation Element.
• Identify possible Neighborhood Traffic Calming strategies which could be
implemented in future to address local concerns.
• Identify possible truck route modifications.
IV CIRCULATION ISSUES
• Identify all intersections which currently experience congestion as well as those
meeting traffic signal warrants. Identify major traffic accident locations.
• Estimate the trip generation potential of the current undeveloped or underdeveloped
land within the City and sphere of influence.
NARFP'S \CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98) 3
u 0 1 �
V.
VI.
Estimate daily traffic volumes and LOS on the circulation systems with the City upon
build -out and identify circulation deficiencies as well as required arterial upgrades.
Prepare measures to reduce delay times during peak hours including ride sharing,
bus, rapid transit and fair share measures for mitigations as part of discretionary
approvals. This should be prepared in light of the South Coast Air Quality District
requirements and the Congestion Management Plan (CMP).
If necessary, estimate air
identification of measures to
NPDES requirements.
SPECIFIC AREAS OF CONCERN
pollution and surface water runoff pollution and
reduce pollution in compliance with the AQMD and
• Sepulveda Boulevard from Imperial Highway to Rosecrans Avenue
• Imperial Highway from Sepulveda Boulevard to Aviation Boulevard
• Nash /Douglas one -way couplet
• Transportation systems interface with LAX and active rail lines (AT & SF and SPRR).
• Extension of existing arterials to complete arterial network
• Green Line usage and support facilities
• Access restrictions on major arterials
• All major intersections in the City
• Policies regarding residential traffic including safety, speed control, placement of stop
signs, street closures and one -way traffic
• Expanded traffic lanes and peak hour parking restrictions
• Bicycle and pedestrian paths
RESOURCES AVAILABLE
The City of El Segundo has several resources available to assist the consultant with the preparation
of the Element. These include:
"Statewide Integrated Traffic Accident Record System" data for 1997. (Includes all
reported vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle accidents for 1997).
"Citywide Speed Zone Survey" (dated October 1995). (Includes speed surveys for
all major streets).
"Citywide Traffic Counts" (1998). (Includes traffic counts for all major streets).
This data will be provided by the City for the preparation of the Element.
NARFFS \CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98) 4
U01ZL
• City of El Segundo General Plan - 1992.
• City of El Segundo General Plan - Existing Conditions Report - April 1992.
• Evaluation of a Traffic Congestion Mitigation Fee - March 19, 1996.
• Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3969 - May 21, 1996.
VII. TIME LINE AND PUBLIC MEETINGS
The following time line is an estimate of the project schedule:
• Selection of Consultant team, finalize contract
• Project initiation
• General Plan Update Ad Hoc Committee Meetings/
Workshop and preparation of Element
• Draft Circulation Element
• Planning Commission and City Council hearing
dates to be decided after staff review of the draft
element
October 20. 1998
November 1. 1998
Januarv-
February 1999
March 1999
The following is a description of public meetings required for attendance and deliverable products:
• The consultant will be required to attend up to ten (10) public workshops with the
Planning Commission and /or City Council, and public hearings before the Planning
Commission and City Council. In addition, the consultant will have numerous on-
going meetings with City staff.
• The consultant will provide appropriate presentation materials for all public
workshops, hearings and City staff meetings. Photocopying of materials will be
performed by the consultant.
• The consultant will provide twenty -one (21) copies of a preliminary Screen Check
Draft Circulation and related Elements and Screen Check Draft Supplemental EIR.
One (1) copy of each shall be unbound.
• One (1) unbound copy of Draft Circulation and Related Elements, and Draft
Supplemental EIR, plus twenty -five (25) bound copies.
• For each Planning Commission public hearing or workshop, consultants shall submit
one (1) unbound copy of revised Draft Circulation and related Elements and Draft
EIR, plus twenty -five (25) copies.
• For each City Council public hearing or workshop, consultant shall submit twenty -one
(21) copies of revised Circulation Element and Screen Check Final EIR for review by
staff. Within one (1) week of receipt of staff comments, consultant shall submit one
(1) unbound copy of the Final Circulation Element and Final EIR, and twenty -five (25)
bound copies.
NARFP'S\CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98)
UO� � �•
For each Planning Commission and /or City Council meeting/workshop, the consultant
shall submit one (1) unbound copy plus twenty -five (25) bound copies of all required
documents with redline /strikeout changes. Documents shall include the Draft
Circulation and related Elements, Draft EIR and related support documents.
Copies of all documents shall be submitted on 3 '/i' computer diskettes, including
text and computerized graphics. WordPerfect, version 6.0a, software should be used
for all written text.
Vlll. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
Your response to this RFP is requested no later than 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 22, 1998.
You are advised that the City reserves the right to retain an expert to evaluate your work if you are
chosen as consultant. Additionally, any contract entered into will be subject to termination at any
stage if in the judgement of the City, such termination is in the best interest of the City. In the event
such decision is made, appropriate written notice would be given before termination of the consultant
would be paid on a pro -rata basis for work performed.
L PROPOSAL CONTENT
1) Approach to the Task:
Statement of tasks to be performed; number of hours allocated by each staff person for each
task; along with the hourly rate of each staff member; methods of information gathering and
analysis to be used; anticipated extent of City staff participation; project management and
liaison with City staff project schedule.
2) Deliverable Products:
A list of documents to be delivered to the City during and at completion of the project.
3) Statement of Qualifications:
• Firm name, address and telephone numbers.
• Project team:
Lead and support personnel, including a description of responsibilities on the project.
• Contemplated subcontractors, if any, must be described. A statement signed by
such subcontractor should be included with the proposal certifying that he /she has
participated in the proposal development and is available to undertake a subcontract
as indicated in the proposal.
• Description of experience with projects of similar scope and character. A copy of a
recent applicable report should also be submitted.
• References: You should include the name, address and telephone numbers of at
NARFP'S \CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98) 6
VU1 [lip
least three (3) recent clients whom we can contact regarding your work.
Statement of ability to comply with the insurance and indemnification provisions set
forth in the City's sample contract attached as Exhibit "A'.
X. FEE PROPOSAL AND FORMS OF CONTRACT:
Total cost for performing all requested services in preparing the Circulation Element update broken
down by task, should be provided with the proposal, and additional information for the Supplemental
EIR.
Proposed fees must be based on calculations of time and materials necessary to accomplish the
proposed scope of services. Estimated costs and a proven record in preparing excellent work
products in a timely manner will be critical factors in evaluating proposals.
Proposed budgets should include a table showing the total estimated number of hours devoted by
each team member to each task.
Upon selection of the top -rated consultant, the City will enter into a contract in a form substantially
similar to the sample contract attached as Exhibit "A ".
SELECTION CRITERIA
In reviewing and evaluating proposals and qualifications, the following criteria will be considered:
• Experience in preparing Circulation Elements, related EIR's, or similar studies.
• Experience in public facilitation.
• Proposed approach, tasks and methodology to be used in providing the required
services.
• Appropriate distribution of responsibilities within the project team.
• Qualifications, experience and availability of key personnel and subconsultants.
• Record of successful relationships with other public and corporate clients.
• Ability to meet or accelerate the project schedule.
• Reasonableness of proposed fee schedule in relation to proposed work plan.
XII. OTHER INFORMATION
Prospective consultants must submit seven (7) copies of their proposal. All proposals must be
received by:
Ms. Cindy Mortesen
City Clerk
City Hall
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
NARFP'S \CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98) 7
001,
no later than 5.00 p.m on Tuesday September 22, 1998. Facsimile proposals and postmarked
documents received after the submittal date will not be accepted.
By submitting a response to this Request for Proposal, prospective consultant waives all rights to
protest or seek any legal remedies whatsoever regarding any aspect of this Request for Proposal.
The City reserves the right to select any number of qualified finalists. In addition, the City reserves
the right to issue written notice to all participating firms of any changes in the proposal submission
schedule, should the City determine in its sole and absolute discretion that such changes are
necessary. Acceptance of any proposal submitted pursuant to this Request for Proposal shall not
constitute any implied intent to enter into a contract for consulting services. The City reserves the
right to reject any and all proposals.
Final consultant selection will be made by the El Segundo City Council. The consultant selected will
be under contract to the City of El Segundo.
If you have any questions, please call Mr. Bellur K. Devaraj, City Engineer, or Ms. Laurie Jester,
Senior Planner, at (310) 322 -4670.
Sincerely,
Bret B. Bernard
Director of Planning and Building Safety
ES:LJ:dr
cc: Bellur K. Devaraj, City Engineer
Laurie Jester, Senior Planner
N: \RFP'S \CELEMENT.RFP (8/11/98)
UU3 J(l
Eduard Schroder
Director of Public Works
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL
Held
Tuesday, June 23, 1998
A meeting of the Economic Development Advisory Council was held on Tuesday, June 23, 1998
in the West Conference Room, El Segundo, California. The meeting was called to order at 11:45
a.m. by Vice Chairperson David Gaulton.
ROLL CALL: Karen Ackland, Chair (Absent)
David J. Gaulton (Present)
Willard Krick ( Present)
Richard C. Lundquist (Present)
Brian Polkinghorne (Present)
Nancy Cobb (Present)
Carl Jacobson (Present)
William T. Mason (Present)
Gary Horwitz (Present)
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - None
A. SPECIAL ITEMS OF BUSINESS
Approval of Minutes of April 30, 1997 Meeting
Ex- Officio Members:
Sandra Jacobs, Mayor Pro Tem
James Hansen, Dir. of
Economic Development
Bret Bernard, Director
Planning & Building Safety
Laurie Jester, Senior Planner
Bellur Devaraj, City Engineer
By motion duly made and seconded, the Minutes of the April 30, 1997 meeting were
approved.
B. GENERAL ITEMS OF BUSINESS
1. Review and Discuss Circulation Element of the General Plan
Jim Hansen gave an overview of the circulation element and its function as part of the
adopted General Plan. He noted that the City is preparing an RFP to retain a consultant
to update the element. The City Council has requested that the EDAC assist in the
development of a scope of work. Some of the subject areas could include future
development potential (existing development agreements, under - developed properties,
etc.), airport expansion, potential population growth, Smokey Hallow, Rosecrans
corridor, Sepulveda corridor, Greenline, as well as other factors.
Al31
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Approve retaining Lawrence R. Moss & Associates to design and prepare plans for the El Segundo Skateboard
Park. Fiscal Impact $19,500.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1- Approve an agreement with Lawrence R. Moss & Associates to design and prepare plans for El Segundo
Skateboard Park at a cost of $19,500.
2- Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the city.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
As part of the 1998 -99 budget, the city council approved a capital improvement project for the design and
construction of a skateboard park at Recreation Park, using the existing parking lot area at the north east corner of
Eucalyptus Drive and Grand Avenue.
DISCUSSION:
City staff received proposals from two companies experienced in the design and construction of skateboard parks
and is recommending Lawrence Moss & Associates design the El Segundo Skateboard Park.
Lawrence R. Moss & Associates $19,500
Purkiss Rose R.S.I. 19,640
Staff has interviewed Lawrence R. Moss & Associates and has made a site visit to the Santa Clarita Skate Park,
their most recent project. We have also talked with Hermosa Beach officials who are using Lawrence Moss to
design their city's skateboard park; they informed us they are very pleased with the service.
The design process will be unusual, and will enlist the skaters of El Segundo to assist staff and architects in the
design for their skateboard park. This will be accomplished by conducting hands -on workshops where
skateboarders will actually try out and choose the elements to be incorporated into the park.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1- Lawrence Moss & Associates Proposal.
2- Agreement for professional services.
FISCAL IMPACT:
(Check one) Operating Budget: Capital Improve. Budget:
Amount Requested: 19.50
Project/Account Budget: 160,000
Project/Account Balance: 160.000 Date: August 18 1998
Account Number:
Project Phase: Design
Appropriation Required - Yes_ No
n01r.1NeTFn• Date: August 10,1998
Jim - -dWC Drr6Mbr—
�D BY:
Ti by 5rimmond, Actii
ACTION TAKEN:
980818.mos 8 -10 -98 10:30am
+�0 LJ
Date:
/Z /s,r
E -19
u. -UD- d j: MOSS
ti
July 6, 1998
Mr. Bellur Devarayj
Public Works Director
Public Works Department
350 Main Street, Room 11
El Segundo, California 90245
LAWAENCE R MOSS ASLA
& ASSOCIATES M;
3458 OCEAN VIEW BLVD
GLENDALE, CA 91206
816 249.5200
FAX 818 248-65 14
CALIF. LICENSE 01201
Rc: Skate Parks in Southern California
Dear Mr. Devaraj:
,A�discussed, the followins is the status of our Skate Park Projects:
• Glendora Skate Park
• Hermosa Beach Skate Park
• La Verne Skate Park
• Lompoc Skate Park
a Santa Clarity Skate Park
Please call if you have any questions.
Preliminary Design Phase
Coast action Document Phase
Preliminary Design Phase
Recently awarded Contract
Construction Phase - Breaking ground 7.13 -98
Very truly yours,
Lahimence R. Moss, President
'LAWRENCE R. MOSS AND ASSOCIATES
1)
MAUODOMOC11
u 0 1 P, LANDSCAPE ^^
P02
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1998, between
the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and
LAWRENCE R. MOSS AND ASSOCIATES, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant ". In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform the services set forth in
Exhibit "A" "SCOPE OF SERVICES" and made a part hereof. Consultant represents and warrants
that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to properly perform said services in a
thorough, competent and professional manner and shall, at all times during the term of this
Agreement, have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law. Consultants shall begin
its services under this Agreement on August 28, 1998. Consultant shall complete each of the
services set forth in Exhibit "A" to the City's satisfaction. If the City is not satisfied with any such
services, the Consultant shall work on such matter until the City approves of the service. Further,
Consultant shall complete the services set forth in Exhibit "A" strictly according to the schedule
provided therein.
2. STATUS OF CONSULTANT. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the
City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement
RP -3
NAAGREEMNTWOSS.AGR (8/6/98) —1—
a.IU��J
on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control.
Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of
Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this
Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers,
employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall
not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind
City in any manner. Consultant shall not disseminate any information or reports gathered or
created pursuant to this Agreement without the prior written approval of City except information or
reports required by government agencies to enable Consultant to perform its duties under this
Agreement.
3. CONSULTANT'S KNOWLEDGE OF APPLICABLE LAWS. Consultant shall keep
itself informed of applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations which may affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement.
Consultant shall observe and comply with all such laws and regulations affecting its employees.
City and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity as a result of any failure
of Consultant to comply with this section.
4. PERSONNEL. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the
stability and continuity of Consultant's staff assigned to perform the services hereunder and shall
obtain the approval of the City Manager of all proposed staff members performing services under
this Agreement prior to any such performance.
K�-L�
N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
1101 '3 r'
5. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. Compensation to the Consultant
shall be as set forth in Exhibit "B" hereto and made a part hereof. Payments shall be made within
thirty (30) days after receipt of each invoice as to all non - disputed fees. If the City disputes any of
consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant in 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any
disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
6. ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANT. Consultant shall not be compensated
for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in
addition to those set forth herein or listed in Exhibit 'A" unless such additional services are
authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for
any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and
Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said
services.
7. ASSIGNMENT. All services required hereunder shall be performed by Consultant,
its employees or personnel under direct contract with Consultant. Consultant shall not assign to
any subcontractor the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due
hereunder, without the prior written consent of City Manager.
N:\AGREEMNTIMOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
iJG13'�
8. FACILITIES AND RECORDS. City agrees to provide: suitably equipped and
furnished office space, public counter, telephone, and use of copying equipment and necessary
office supplies for Consultant's on -site staff, if any.
Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs,
expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of
services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided
in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily
accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at
reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said
books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow
inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such
records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years
after receipt of final payment.
9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be terminated with or
without cause by either party upon 30 days written notice. In the event of such termination,
Consultant shall be compensated for non - disputed fees under the terms of this Agreement up to
the date of termination.
NAGREEMNnMOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
6 013F
10. COOPERATION BY CITY. All public information, data, reports, records, and maps
as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out
the work as outlined in the Scope of Services, shall be furnished to Consultant in every reasonable
way to facilitate, without undue delay, the work to be performed under this Agreement.
11. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event
of termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original maps, models, designs,
drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other
documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this
Agreement shall, become the sole property of City. With respect to computer files, Consultant
shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary
computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing
computer files.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION /CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
(a) All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be
considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization excepting that information which is a public record and subject to disclosure pursuant
to the California Public Records Act, Government Code § 6250, et sea. Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager
or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support,
0- 1
N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
601 0� 19
testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work
performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City.
Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant
gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
If Consultant or any of its officers, employees, consultants or subcontractors does
voluntarily provide information in violation of this Agreement, City has the right to reimbursement
and indemnity from Consultant for any damages caused by Consultant's conduct, including the
City's attorney's fees.
Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or
subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request
for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or
subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with
respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obli-
gation, to represent Consultant and /or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding.
Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review
any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any
such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
� P -Fs
N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
:014
(b) Consultant covenants that neither they nor any officer or principal of their firm has
any interest in, or shall they acquire any interest, directly or indirectly which will conflict in any
manner or degree with the performance of their services hereunder. Consultant further covenants
that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having such interest shall be employed by
them as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor without the express written consent of the
City Manager.
13. DEFAULT. In the event that Consultant is in default of any provision of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant.
14. INDEMNIFICATION.
(a) Consultant represents it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform
the services and duties agreed to hereunder by Consultant, and City relies upon the skills and
knowledge of Consultant. Consultant shall perform such services and duties consistent with the
standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals performing similar service in
the State of California.
(b) Consultant is an independent contractor and shall have no authority to bind City nor
to create or incur any obligation on behalf of or liability against City, whether by contract or
otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this agreement or is otherwise
N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
X014
expressly conferred in writing by City. City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents,
employees and volunteers (individually and collectively, "Indemnitees ") shall have no liability to
Consultant or to any other person for, and Consultant shall indemnify, defend, protect and hold
harmless the Indemnitees from and against, any and all liabilities, claims, actions, causes of action,
proceedings, suits, damages, judgments, liens, levies, costs and expenses of whatever nature,
including reasonable attorneys' fees and disbursements (collectively "Claims "), which the
Indemnitees may suffer or incur or to which the Indemnitees may become subject by reason of or
arising out of any injury to or death of any person(s), damage to property, loss of use of property,
economic loss or otherwise occurring as a result of or allegedly caused by the performance or
failure to perform by Consultant of Consultant's services under this agreement or the negligent or
willful acts or omissions of Consultant, its agents, officers, directors or employees, in performing
any of the services under this agreement.
If any action or proceeding is brought against the Indemnitees by reason of any of the
matters against which Consultant has agreed to indemnify the Indemnitees as above provided,
Consultant, upon notice from the CITY, shall defend the Indemnitees at Consultant's expense by
counsel acceptable to the City. The Indemnitees need not have first paid any of the matters as to
which the Indemnitees are entitled to indemnity in order to be so indemnified. The insurance
required to be maintained by Consultant under paragraph 15 shall ensure Consultant's obligations
under this paragraph 14(b), but the limits of such insurance shall not limit the liability of Consultant
hereunder. The provisions of this paragraph 14(b) shall survive the expiration or earlier termination
of this agreement.
N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
A0 J V
The Consultant's indemnification does not extend to Claims occurring as a result of the
City's negligent or willful acts or omissions.
15. INSURANCE.
A. Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall provide and maintain insurance
acceptable to the City Attorney in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement,
against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection
with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives or
employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than
A:VII. Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
as:
(1) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad
(a) Insurance Services Office form Commercial General Liability
coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001).
(b) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, including code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025, or equivalent
forms subject to the written approval of the City.
V-0
NAAGREEMNTWOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
6 014.,
(c) Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor
Code of State of California and Employer's Liability insurance and covering all persons providing
services on behalf of the Consultant and all risks to such persons under this Agreement.
(d) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
Consultant's profession.
(2) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits of
insurance no less than:
(a) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other
form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately
to the activities related to this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required
occurrence limit.
(b) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
and property damage.
�P -ia
N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
J014'
(c) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers'
Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability
limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
(d) Errors and Omissions Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
B Other Provisions. Insurance policies required by this Agreement shall
contain the following provisions:
(1) All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this paragraph 15
shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by the insurer
or either parry to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior written
notice by Certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
(2) General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages.
(a) City, its officers, officials, and employees and volunteers are
to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Consultant
performs, products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used
by Consultant, or automobiles owned, leased or hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage
shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials,
or employees.
��-13
N:\AGREEMNTIMOSS.AGR (8/6/98) -11-
6 O14v
(b) Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance
as respect to City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self insurance
maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not
contribute with, Consultant's insurance.
(c) Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's
liability.
(d) Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of
the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its
officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Coverage. Unless
the City Manager otherwise agrees in writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of
subrogation against City, its officers, officials, employees and agents for losses arising from work
performed by Consultant for City.
C. Other Reauirements. Consultant agrees to deposit with City, at or before
the effective date of this contract, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the
insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City Attorney may require that
Consultant furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this
0 -14
N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
j0141
Section. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that
insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies
of all required insurance policies, at any time.
(1) Consultant shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each
subcontractor identical to those Consultant provides.
(2) Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and
approved by City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such
deductibles or self- insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims.
(3) The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall
not be construed to limit Consultant's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions
and requirements of this Agreement.
16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement is the complete, final, entire and
exclusive expression of the Agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes any and all
other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter
herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations by any party which
are not embodied herein and that no other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this
Agreement shall be valid and binding.
N:WGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
OC14
17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the Los Angeles County Superior Court.
18. ASSIGNMENT OR SUBSTITUTION. City has an interest in the
qualifications of and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations
imposed upon Consultant by this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, neither any complete
nor partial assignment of this Agreement may be made by Consultant nor changed, substituted for,
deleted, or added to without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment or
substitution shall be ineffective, null, and void, and constitute a material breach of this Agreement
entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including summary termination of this
Agreement.
19. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. The terms of this Agreement can only
be modified in writing approved by the City Council and the Consultant. The parties agree that this
requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and any attempted waiver shall be void.
N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
00.148
20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE. The person or persons executing this
Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he /she /they has /have the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of his /her /their corporation and warrants and
represents that he /she /they has /have the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its
obligations hereunder.
21. NOTICES. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal
service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody
of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows:
Cam.
Attention: Mr. Jim Fauk
Recreation and Parks Department
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, California 90245
Telephone (310) 322 -4670, extension 298
Facsimile (310) 322 -3693
Consultant.
Attention: Mr. Lawrence Moss
3458 Ocean View Boulevard
Glendale, CA 91208
Telephone: (818) 248 -5200
Facsimile: (818) 248 -6574
N: AGREEMNTWOSS.AGR (8/6/98) -15-
0014J
The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service,
or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal
Service.
20. SEVERABILITY. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this
Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of the other provisions of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHERE OF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
Z
Title
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
Title
ATTEST:
Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk
NAAGREEMNTWOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
APPROVERAS TO FORM:
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Phase I — Preliminary Study
A. Establish communication with key City of El Segundo staff and review, clarify and
define project schedule, proposed budgets and project elements.
B. With City staff, plan, design and schedule public meeting in the community to
introduce the project and seek public input on skate park.
C. Obtain available documentation and project information from the City and review.
D. Evaluate site and assess existing site conditions.
E. Recommend proposed methods of conducting work.
F. Create base sheets for project.
Phase II — Preliminary Design
A. Develop conceptual plan alternatives based on site investigation, research and
public input.
B. Prepare preliminary cost estimates for each conceptual plan alternative.
C. Review conceptual plan alternatives with City staff for input and approval.
D. Revise conceptual plan alternatives per City staff input.
E. Present conceptual plan alternatives in 2nd community meeting for input and
approval.
Phase III — Design Development
A. Receive direction to proceed with preferred alternative from City staff.
B. Prepare a preliminary plan based on the preferred alternative that reflects the
consensus of staff and community. Site furnishings, materials, etc., will be selected
at this time.
C. Review final plan with city staff.
D. Prepare colored rendering of approved final design for presentation in 3'd community
meeting.
E. Prepare updated construction cost estimate for preferred design alternative.
F. Attend up to two City Council meetings
Phase IV — Construction Documents
A. Incorporate all modifications generated by the City of El Segundo and all agencies.
B. Prepare based on approved preliminary plan, final working drawings, specifications
and details required to meet City ordinances and standards.
Drawings shall include: Grading and Drainage Plan, Construction Plan,
Electrical and Civil Engineering, Planting Plan, Irrigation Plan, Lighting Plan,
and Details
C. Prepare estimate of construction costs and review with City staff.
D. Make final corrections based on city review.
NAAGREEMNTWOSS.AGR (8/6198)
0051
Phase V — Construction Administration
A. Assist City with bidding process
1. Conduct pre -bid meeting
2. Provide clarification of drawings and answer questions from contractors
during the bidding process.
3. Prepare necessary addenda to bid package.
B. Construction administration and field observation
1. Conduct pre- construction meeting.
2. Provide eight (8) site observation visits, as required.
3. Conduct weekly progress meetings.
4. Review shop drawings, samples and submissions
5. Provide construction support by telephone as needed throughout
construction.
N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98)
605 '
EXHIBIT "B"
COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT
FEE: $19,500.00
FEE SCHEDULE:
Due upon completion of Phase 1
$2,000.00
Due upon completion of Phase 11, and approvals
$3,000.00
Due upon completion of Phase III, and approvals
$4,000.00
Due upon completion of Phase IV, and approvals
$7,500.00
Due upon completion of Phase V, and approvals
$3,000.00
The following shall not be considered part of the above fee and will be charged for as-noted:
1. Revision(s) to any previously approved drawings shall be charged for at the rate of $95.00
per hour.
2. Expenses including, but not limited to, printing, plotting,
deliveries, etc. will be charged for
at Consultant's cost.
3. Site visits over and above those previously mentioned will be billed for at $105.00 per hour,
if required.
N:\AGREEMNT\MOSS.AGR (8/6/98) _19-
nu J '
li v j_ ;_,
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Resolution approving the application for funds in the amount of $33,535 from the Los Angeles County Regional
Park and Open Space District per Parcel Discretionary Grant Program for El Segundo Skateboard Park.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Approve Resolution
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The city's Capital Improvement Budget calls for the design and construction of a Skateboard Park to be located at
the corner of Eucalyptus Drive and Grand Avenue.
The project budget is $160,000 and calls for applying for grant funding of $36,000, leaving a general fund
obligation of $124,000. Since submitting the capital improvement request, we have been informed that less
money is available, which reduces our grant request to $33,535.
DISCUSSION:
The funding source for the grant is the Los Angeles County Safe Neighborhood Parks Proposition which entitles
the City of El Segundo to per parcel discretionary funding. El Segundo has used similar funding in the past for
such projects as Richmond Field lighting and Holly Valley Park.
One change in funding requirements calls for each funded project to employ at risk youth, from the community to
work on the project. Each governing body submitting a project must approve a youth employment plan, which has
created problems and concerns from many municipalities. We will work to develop a plan and come back to
council for approval once we feel an acceptable plan is developed.
The requirement is that 10% of the grant amount must be used for the employment of at risk youth. It is our plan
to include this as part of the bid specification.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Resolution - Approving application for grant funds from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open
Space District Grant Program
FISCAL IMPACT:
(Check one) Operating Budget: Capital Improv. Budget:
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance: Date:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
ADoropriation Required - Yes_ No_
ORIGi WED; i Date: August 7, 1
Jim Fo k, >Trector
RE EWED BY: Date:
el4xfe
T y rimmond, Acting ity Manager
ACTION TAKEN: P
980818.skb 8 -07 -98 12:00am
;� o E -20
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS
ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT GRANT
PROGRAM FOR EL SEGUNDO SKATEBOARD PARK
WHEREAS, the people of the County of Los Angeles on November 3, 1992 and on November 5, 1996,
enacted Los Angeles County Proposition A, Safe Neighborhood Parks, Gang Prevention, Tree - Planting, Senior and
Youth Recreation, Beaches and Wildlife Protection, which, among other uses, provides funds to public agencies
and nonprofit organizations in the County for the purposes of acquiring and /or developing facilities and open
space for public recreation; and
WHEREAS, the Proposition also created the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District
to administer said funds; and
WHEREAS, the District has set forth the necessary procedures governing applications for grant funds
under the Proposition; and
WHEREAS, the District's procedures require the Applicant to certify, by resolution, approval of the
application before submission of said application to the District; and
WHEREAS, the application form contains assurances that the Applicant must comply with; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant certifies through this resolution; that the application is approved for submission
to the District; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Project Agreement with the District for performance of the
project as described in the application;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY:
1. Approves the filing of an application with Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District for funds
allocated under Section 3 (C) (1) of the Proposition for the above -named Project; and
2. Certifies that said Applicant understands the assurances and certifications in the application form; and
3. Certifies that said Applicant understands its obligation to operate and maintain the property in perpetuity; and
4. Certifies that said Applicant will sign and return, within 30 days, both copies of the project agreement sent by
the District for authorizing signature; and
5. Authorizes the Director of Recreation and Parks, or designee, as agent of City of El Segundo to conduct all
negotiations, and to execute and submit all- documents including, but not limited to, applications, agreements,
amendments, payment requests and so forth, which may be necessary for the completion of the project as described
in the application.
RESOLUTION NO,
APPROVING GRANT APPLICATION
FOR SKATEBOARD PARK
PAGE
i P- gkb -A
0015.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1998.
MIKE GORDON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed
and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City
Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18th day of August, 1998, and the same was
so passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CINDY MORTESEN, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MARK D. HENSLEY, CITY ATT NEY
RESOLUTION NO.
S lL b _ APPROVING GRANT APPLICATION
FOR SKATEBOARD PARK
PAGE 2
t t' J �
li 0 1
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Resolution approving the application for funds in the amount of $41,000 from the Los Angeles County Regional
Park and Open Space District per Parcel Discretionary Grant Program for El Segundo Roller Hockey Rink.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Approve Resolution
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The city's Capital Improvement Budget calls for the completion of the Roller Hockey Rink at Recreation Park which
will include such features as dasher boards, fencing, viewing areas, team benches, lighting and bleachers.
The project budget is $104,000 and calls for applying for grant funding of $41,000, leaving a general fund
obligation of $63 ,000.
DISCUSSION:
The funding source for the grant is the Los Angeles County Safe Neighborhood Parks Proposition which entities
the City of El Segundo to per parcel discretionary funding. El Segundo has used similar funding in the past for
such projects as Richmond Field lighting and Holly Valley Park.
One change in funding requirements calls for each funded project to employ at risk youth, from the community to
work on the project. Each governing body submitting a project must approve a youth employment plan, which has
created problems and concerns from many municipalities. We will work to develop a plan and come back to
council for approval once we feel an acceptable plan is developed.
The requirement is that 10% of the grant amount must be used for the employment of at risk youth. It is our plan
to include this as part of the bid specification.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Resolution - Approving application for grant funds from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open
Space District Grant Program
FISCAL IMPACT:
(Check one) Operating Budget: Capital Improv. Budget:
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance: Date:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required - Yes_ No_
%RI T : Date: August 7, 1998
irec or
REVIEWED BY:
T by Grimmond, Acting ity Man
ACTION TAKEN:
980818.cty 8 -07 -98 10:30am
10 15"'
Date:
gyp - RH- I
E -21
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS
ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT GRANT
PROGRAM FOR EL SEGUNDO ROLLER HOCKEY RINK
WHEREAS, the people of the County of Los Angeles, on November 3, 1992 and on November 5, 1996,
enacted Los Angeles County Proposition A, Safe Neighborhood Parks, Gang Prevention, Tree - Planting, Senior and
Youth Recreation, Beaches and Wildlife Protection, which, among other uses, provides funds to public agencies
and nonprofit organizations in the County for the purposes of acquiring and /or developing facilities and open
space for public recreation; and
WHEREAS, the Proposition also created the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District
to administer said funds; and
WHEREAS, the District has set forth the necessary procedures governing applications for grant funds
under the Proposition; and
WHEREAS, the District's procedures require the Applicant to certify, by resolution, approval of the
application before submission of said application to the District; and
WHEREAS, the application form contains assurances that the Applicant must comply with; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant certifies through this resolution that the application is approved for submission
to the District; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Project Agreement with the District for performance of the
project as described in the application;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Approves the filing of an application with Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District for funds
allocated under Section 3 (C) (1) of the Proposition for the above -named Project; and
2. Certifies that said Applicant understands the assurances and certifications in the application form; and
3. Certifies that said Applicant understands its obligation to operate and maintain the property in perpetuity; and
4. Certifies that said Applicant will sign and return, within thirty (30) days, both copies of the project agreement
sent by the District for authorizing signature; and
`5. Authorizes the Director of Recreation and Parks , or designee, as agent of City of El Segundo to conduct all
negotiations, and to execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to, applications, agreements,
amendments, payment requests and so forth, which may be necessary for the completion of the project as described
in the application.
oU1DI
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING GRANT APPLICATION
FOR ROLLER HOCKET RINK
PAGE
a
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1998.
MIKE GORDON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and
adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk
of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18th day of August, 1998, and the same was so
passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT;
ABSTAIN:
CINDY MORTESEN, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MARK b. HENSLEY, CITY A'
li u 1 5 9
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING GRANT APPLICATION
FOR ROLLER HOCKET RINK
3 PAGE 2
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 18 August 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Extension of City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Contracts
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Approve no -cost extension of City's RSI Contracts through end of calendar year 1998.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
Coordination with the 62 homeowners participating in Phase 5 of the City's RSI Program, to minimize
inconvenience and maximize service, took longer than anticipated. As a result, and as indicated previously,
the start of construction was delayed. Initially it was planned that the construction for Phase 5 would be
completed by August 1998. Completion is now planned for October 1998. In order to continue the work of
Wyle Laboratories, Golden Bear Construction, T & M Construction, and Peerless Products, Inc., it is
necessary to extend the life of their contracts. As a precaution against further delays, it is requested that the
Phase 5 RSI contracts be extended to the end of calendar year 1998. It is also requested the Wyle contract
be extended two full calendar years.
DISCUSSION:
The City has approached the RSI program as a series of custom home modification projects rather than a
federal, "cinder block project ". As part of the City's approach, all project staff, including the City's staff, the
consultant, and the contractor have taken great pains to meet frequently with all 62 participating homeowners.
The purpose of these meetings is to ensure that the homeowner knows what is planned, that the homeowner's
input is fully evaluated and incorporated into the plan wherever possible, that options are presented where
possible, and that surprises are minimized, if not eliminated. Among the dozen or so homeowners whose
Phase 5 homes have been completed thus far, the consensus has been that the homes are much quieter as
a result of the RSI treatment. The ventilation systems have received kudos and the workmanship of the
contractors has been praised. When there have been questions, participating homeowners have had no
difficulty contacting their contractor and /or the City and getting timely answers. This personalized treatment
has had a large time price tag, however we believe it has produced happier participants and minimized
problems.
Should the Council determine it appropriate to extend the RSI provider contracts, an Addendum Agreement
to the current contracts will be entered into between the City and each of the four companies. (Please see
attached documents). There is no increase in cost associated with this extension request.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Contract Extension Agreements for: Wyle Laboratories, Golden Bear Construction, T & M Construction, and
Peerless Products, Inc.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ORIGINATED'a
REVIEWED BY:
Date: 29 July 1998
Date: 29 July 1998
REVIEWED BY: Date:
� /Z /fe
'AKEN:
o 1 E -22
C: \harvey \rsi98 \contract.798
AMENDMENT 3
TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PW97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998
The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the " Cit% °) and Peerless Products. Inc. (hereinafter "Peerless'. collectivel} the
"Parties "), herebiv amend the Cit}-'s Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract**). Contract No. 2559. of
4 November 1997. (the "Contract") as follows:
Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 01015. Volume 2. Standard Project .Specifications and Details.
is amended as follows:
Remove: Constriction shall substantiallN be complete NNithin 180 calendar days of the date of the Notice -to-
Proceed.
Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 December 1998.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
By
Date:
Harvey Holden. Airport Projects Admin.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
'lark sic\. Cite Attorn
ATTEST:
Cindy Mortensen. Cite Clerk
li 01
C:A h arvcv \rsicontr.98 \anuid2559.003
PEERLESS PRODUCTS. INC.
By:
Date:
John Johnston. VP Sales /Marketing
AMENDMENT 3
TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PW97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998
The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the " Citv") and G.B. Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "Golden Bcar' . collectively
the "Parties "). hereby amend the City's Residential Sound lnsulation (RSI) Program Contract —). Contract No. 2%0.
of 4 November 1997. (the "Contract-') as follm\s:
Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 01015. Volume 2. Standard Project Specifications and Details.
is amended as follows:
Remove: Constniction shall substantially be complete N\ ithin 180 calendar days of the date of the Notice -to-
Proceed.
Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 December 1 998.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
By
Harvey Holdcn. Airport Projects Admin.
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
tits Cite Attorney
ATTEST:
Cindv Mortensen. Cite Clerk
t; 01
C:\Iiar veN, \rsicontr.98 \anuid2560.003
G.B. CONSTRUCTION. INC.
LN
Date:
Chin Lee. President
AMENDMENT 3
TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PNi'97 -SA OF 18 AUGUST 1998
The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the -Cite') and G.B. Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "Golden Bear'. collectively
the "Parties"). hereby amend the City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract'). Contract No. 2561.
of 4 November 1997. (the "Contract ") as follo\\s:
Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 0 10 15. Volume 2. Standard Project ,Specifications and Details.
is amended as follows:
Remove: Construction shall substant iii ll\ be complete \ \ithin 190 calendar days of the date of the Notice -to-
Proceed.
Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 Dccertlber 1995.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
By:
Harvey Holden. Airport Projects Admin.
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
a Hens e\'. Cit\ Attornc\
ATTEST:
Cind\ Mortensen. City Clerk
o1
C:\ han •c\, \rsi coil tr. 95 \a ill nd2561.00 3
G.B. CONSTRUCTION. INC.
Date:
Chin Lee. President
AMENDMENT 3
TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PW97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998
The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the "City-)and G.B. Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "Golden Bear ". collectively
the "Parties"). herebv amend the Citv's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract "). Contact No. 2562,
of 4 November 1997. (the "Contract") as follom:
Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 01015. Volume 2. ,S'randa, d pr ject •tipeci/ications and Derails.
is amended as follows:
Remove: Construction shall substantially be complete N\ ithin 18o calendar days of the date of the Notice -to-
Proceed.
Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall e.xpire on 31 December 1998.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
L-12
Date:
Han e) Holden. Airport Projects Admin.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/j
Cite Atto
ATTEST:
Cindy Mortensen. Cite Clerk
U0.1 .
C:A th an,cN- \rsicontr.98 \amed2562.00
G.B. CONSTRUCTION. INC.
Date:
Chin Lee. President
AMENDMENT 3
TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PW97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998
The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the "Cite-) and G.B. Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "Golden Bear'. collectiveh
the "Parties"), hereby amend the City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract). Contract No. 2563.
of 4 November 1997. (the °Contract') as follows:
Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 01015. Volume 2. Stondord Project Specification.% and Uetods.
is amended as tbllo\cs:
Remove: Construction shall substantially be complete within 180 calendar days of the dine of the Notice -to-
Proceed.
Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 December 1998.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
By:
Date:
Han-c) Holden. Airport Projects Admin.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
m slcc. Cite Altorne\
ATTEST:
Cindy Mortensen. Cite Clerk
R r c-
C:Ahan °eN• \rsicontr.98 \anutd2 563.003
G.B. CONSTRUCTION. INC.
0
Date:
Chin Lee. President
AMENDMENT 3
TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PW97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998
The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the °Cite ") and T K M Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "T & M ". collectively the
"Parties'), hereby amend the City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract"). Contract No. 2564. of
4 November 1997. (the -Contract") as follows:
Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section O 1015. VOIUme 2..S'tandard Project .Specifications and Derails.
is amended as follows:
Remove: Construction shall substantialIN be complete within 150 calendar dads of the date of the Notice -to-
Proceed.
Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 December 1995.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
By
Han•e� Holden. Airport Projects Admin.
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
k Henslct-.'City AtlorneN
ATTEST:
Cindy Mortensen. Cite Clerk
C:Ahan,cv \rsicontr.95 \anutd2 564.003
T K M CONSTRUCTION. INC.
I�
Date:
Tern Tsetseris. ON\ ner
AMENDMENT 3
TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PNV97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998
Tile City of El Segundo (hereinafter the " CitN") and G.B. Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "Golden Bear collectively
the "Parties"). hereby amend the City's Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract). Contract No. 2 >6-5.
of 4 November 1997. (the "Contract') as folloN%s:
Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 0 101 5. Volume 2. Standard Project Specifications and Details.
is amended as folloNNs:
Remove: Construction shall substantially be complete NN ithin 180 calendar daN s of the date of the Notice -to-
Proceed.
Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 December 1998.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
Bv:
Harvey Holden. Airport Projects Admin.
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
�Giyrl: ns _ .Cite ttornc\
ATTEST:
Cindy Mortensen. Cite Clerk
C.1 G7
C:A har n•ev \rsicontr.98 \amnd2565.003
G.B. CONSTRUCTION. INC.
LIZA
Date:
Chin Lee. President
AMENDMENT 3
TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE SOUND INSULATION OF DWELLINGS IN THE CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO INCLUDING PROJECT NUMBERS PW97 -2 TO PW97 -8A OF 18 AUGUST 1998
The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the " City-) and G.B. Construction. Inc. (hereinafter "Golden Bear ". collectively
the "Parties "). hereby amend the City*s Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) Program Contract"). Contract No. 2566.
of 4 November 1997. (the "Contract ") as follows:
Seventh sub - paragraph of Paragraph 1.3. of Section 01015. Volume 2. ,Stn»dnrd Project .Specification and Details.
is amended as follows:
Remove: Construction shall substantially be colllplete \N ithln 180 calendar days of the date of the Notice -to-
Proceed.
Replace With: Subject to the terms herein. this Contract shall expire on 31 December 1998.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
Bv:
Harney Holden. Airport Projects Adnlill.
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
i
ark ens it4c.
i
ATTEST:
Cindn Mortensen. Cite Clerk
�,0' fiP
It
C: \harnev \rsicontr.98 \anllld2 566.003
G.B. CONSTRUCTION. INC.
0
Dale:
Chin Lee. President
AMENDMENT 3
TO AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
El Se«undo Public Works Project No. PW93 -21
OF 18 AUGUST 1998
The City of El Segundo (hereinafter the `CitN-) and Wyle Laboratories (hereinafter "W} le collectively the
"Parties "). hereby amend the Agreement to provide consultant sen-ices for the Ciq *s Residential Sound Insulation
(RSI) Program". Contract No. 2300, of 5 October 1993. (the -Agreement") as folloNv s:
Amendment No. 2 of 10 June 1996: Section 8 of Amendment No. 2 extended the term of the
original agreement for two years from the effect i\ e date of the Amendment.
Amendment No. 3: Amendment No. 3 estendes the term of the original agreement
for an additional two years from the effective date of Amendment No. 3.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
WYLE LABORATORIES
By:
B\:
Harvey Holden. Airport Projects Admin. Llo. d l{osenki. Contracts Manager
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
i
Hens e\. Cite Attornc\
ATTEST:
Cind\ Mortensen. Cite Clerk
C : \laarn-cN, \rsicontr.98 \anlnd\N \ lc -003
Date.
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Authorization to solicit bids for an annual contract for sidewalk, curb and other minor repairs - Project No. PW
98 -3 (budgeted amount $50,000.00).
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of bids.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
The 1998 -99 Capital Improvement Program includes $50,000.00 in Gas Tax funds for a project to repair
sidewalks and curbs at various locations.
Historically, the City has a sidewalk repair program which was implemented once a year. This program
included sidewalks at various locations throughout the City where repairs were warranted.
DISCUSSION:
The current program was implemented only once every year. This resulted in repair of some sidewalks delayed
by as much as one (1) year.
Staff is proposing the annual contract to provide better service to the community by expeditiously repairing
sidewalks. This contract will establish unit bid prices for sidewalks, curbs and other minor improvements. On
an as needed basis, the contractor will be given repair locations (approximately once every two (2) months).
The contractor will be guaranteed a minimum order of $7,500.00 based on contract unit prices. With this
contract, the anticipated time for an identified sidewalk to be repaired is two (2) months rather than the one (1)
year for the current program.
Staff recommends City Council authorization to advertise the project for receipt of bids.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget:
Capital Improvement Budget:
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required:
No
Yes
$50,000.00
$50,000Q0
$50.000.00 Date:
By Finance Department
Adoption of plans and specifications
No
r 17 o
iJ-1 f '
WCOUNCILTW- AUG18.04 (Monday 8/10/98 10:00 AM)
E -23
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 18, 1998
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Agenda
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Award of contract for sidewalk replacement, handicap ramps and new sidewalks on Grand Avenue - Project
No. PW 97 -26 (contract amount = $73,310.00).
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
Award contract to the lowest responsible bidder, HiTech Pro Construction Company, in the amount of
$73,310.00.
Authorize the Mayor to execute the standard public works construction agreement after approval as
to form by the City Attorney.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:
On July 7, 1998, the City Council adopted plans and specifications and authorized staff to advertise the project
for receipt of construction bids. The project includes repair of sidewalks and handicapped access ramps at
various locations and installation of new sidewalk on the northside of Grand Avenue between Illinois Street and
Sepulveda Boulevard.
DISCUSSION:
On July 28, 1998, the City Clerk received and opened the following bids:
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Location map.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget:
Capital Improvement Budget:
Amount Requested:
Project/Account Budget:
Project/Account Balance:
Account Number:
Project Phase:
Appropriation Required:
(continued on the next page.......)
No
Yes
$73.310.00
$110,000.00
$105.000.00 Date: 6/25/98
106 -400- 8203 -8604 8562 and 114 -400- 8203 -8972
Award of contract
No
Page 1 of 2
. 17t
NACOUNCILTW-AUG18.05 (Monday 8/10/981:00 E -24
DISCUSSION: (continued)
HiTech Pro Construction Company
CJ Construction, Inc.
Damon Construction
Excel Paving Company
Nobest Inc.
Pave West
Engineer's Estimate
$ 73,310.00
$ 76,543.60
$ 87,456.00
$124,663.00
$143,112.20
$195,048.00
$ 80,117.00
Starting June 10, 1998, the City advertised the sidewalk repair program on the community cable television
system. Subsequent to the preparation of plans and specifications for this project, staff has received citizen
requests for sidewalk repair at twenty -one (21) locations. This additional work will be accomplished through
the proposed HiTech Pro contract utilizing its low bid contract unit prices.
Staff has received favorable responses from references provided by the apparent low bidder. Staff
recommends award of contract to HiTech Construction Company in the amount of $73,310.00.
Page 2 of 2
1 � n
NACOUNCIUPW- AUG18.05 (Monday 8/10/98 1:00 PM)
HILLCREST ST
Ion
LOMA VIST
WHITING
VIRGINIA
ECONCORD
m
RICHMOND
MAIN
9
STANDARD
= S T.
ST.
ST.
b
3 S T.
... S T
EUCALYPTUS
a
14 ARENA
0 SHELDON
PENN
0
SIERRA
Vw
b LOMITA
A
in MARYLAND
p BUNGALOW
4
CENTER
NEVADA
ST.
S T.
z
DR.
S1.
ST.
ST
ST
S T.
S T.
DR.
S T.
ST.
OREGON ST.
CALIFORNIA a ST.
KANSAS MIST.
WASHINGTON O ST.
ILLINOIS ST
INDIANA ST.
W
w
o0l73
S West City Boundory-- I REDWOOD
_. �...� AVE.
YUCCA ST. N
c�
9 ;
ZO �
HILL RES T
0
= N
�' ' r > 19 0 < D
le r 30 = A
C a
S ( VALLEY
c z I LOMA IST S
� BAYONNE
T��B S
® E3
R CON RD
ElEil �DBB PL.
CEO ST.
B8 m 880 0
i o F\ � PEPPER ST
_ a
D
a
I��88E0
�® s CYP SI
e® oC0D300
McCARTH CT.
LOMITA
ari ®� BUNGA
CALIFORNIA ST.
co
rn
a as
DO m
HI TON
WA ST.
o �
ILLINOIS IN UWA
C < _
CT. N
' N
r s`x
N � � S T. I
O
y
i
m
a
r m
O
c
CL
0
i
m
08/17/98 16:48 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
Federal Aviation Administration
Western - Pacific Region
Hawthorne, California
Date: 1//1/91
To: -M 1'k 6MkyV--'
From:
No. of pages including cover:
Phone: (310) 725 -3550
COMMENTS:
zv�
i
OPTIONAL FORM 97 (7-90)
NC.831 P001/24E
Fax: (310) 536 -8400
�
6Pfe& of u..
Regional
Administrator
2E /17/98 16:44
U.S. Deportment
of Tror%padatlon
Federoi Aviation
Administratlon
AwP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
JUN 0 5 1998
Dear Citizen:
ornCe or the Regional - Administrator
Western - Pacinc Reglon
[� NO.931 P202/245
P. O. Box 92007
Worldway Postal Center
Los Angeles, CA 90009
Thank you for attending the community meeting held at El
Segundo High School on Tuesday, April 28, 1998.
Enclosed is the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA)
response to the issue you noted that evening on the speaker
request form.
We appreciate your attendance at the meeting and your
interest in aviation safety.
sincerely,
William C. Withycombe
Regional Administrator
Enclosure
CC,. Congresswoman Jane Harman
Mo
W \ x \
et/!'t/9B 16:48 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.631 P003i0,
El Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form't�,f
Please print Clearly
NAW e —tlr b r v c� j S /' o`
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
ADDRESS h1 5
CI'T'Y, ZIP er W1 0 5rN �G % 902's %1 PHONE 3 3 (—
TOPIC N 0 1 S P n d-e r So dLl 2 6cAk �-/
06/17/98 16 :48 AWP -6
Noise Over South Bay
Jane Garvey, The Federal Aviation Administration 0-'AA) Administrator, established The
Southern California Task Force (SCTF) to address aircraft noise concerns within the Los
Angeles Basin. Ms. Garvey initiated this action after attending a local town hall meeting
on December 12, 1997. The meeting was in regards to current operations at Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and future plans. The SCTF will analyze the current air
traffic procedures within the Southern California area relative to aviation safety,
efficiency, and quality-of -life concerns.
'Die goal of the task force is to balance the needs of the Southern California commUdties
with that of the airspace users and the FAA, while ensuring the integrity of the National
Airspace System. The SCTF is meeting with FAA facility managers, airport sponsors,
community representatives, elected officials, aviation users groups, and the general
public to identify concerns, community impacts, and proposed solutions. The task force
has held town hall meetings at Monterey Park, Torrance and El Segundo.
The SCTF is identifying and evaluating the safety and efficiency of current air traffic
procedures and their noise impacts on affected communities. These concerns are being
prioritized into short term, intermediate, and long -term action items. A plan leading to
completion of the action items is also being developed. You may with to visit our
Internet site at www.aW.faa.gov and click on "Southern California Task Force" for more
information on the group's activity.
The city of Los Angeles is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development
alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are
preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
(EISIEIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze numerous environmental issues, including noise.
The EIR/EIS process is a public process.
06/17/98 16:48 AWP -6 OP6 CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.831 P025/045
� J
El Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
,please print cearly
NAME r.I b'� / 04 e S
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
ADDRESS �� °r 1.�� �e.• e�.� �V�.
CITY, ZIP
.0 v° y PHONE 3/o G f
TOPIC Pd tL-r
08/17/98 16:49 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310
% Airport
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIRIEIS process is a
public process.
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed munber and can vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn
down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures we delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the ;gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety and. environmental perspective before
they can be implemented.
08/17/98 16:48 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
n Jegunuo I..UIi munLLY IVIUU1.11 ,
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NAME
l%,�P
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
NC.831 P027/045
ADDRESS I•�'!�X 5 ra'C. i� "r
CITY, ZIP 0*17,1N gC *l+-- PHONE 31 Z� �{�f 73
TOPIC l S
Bd/17/9B 16:45 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322
Noise
Jane Garvey, The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator, established The
Southern California Task Force (SCTF) to address aircraft noise concerns within the Los
Angeles Basin. Ms. Garvey initiated this action after attending a local town hall meeting
on December 12, 1997. The meeting was in regards to current operations at Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and future plans. The SCTF will analyze the current air
traffic procedures within the Southern California area, relative to aviation safety,
efficiency, and quality-of -life concerns.
The goal of the task force is to balance the needs of the Southern California communities
with that of the airspace users and the FAA, while ensuring the integrity of the National
Airspace System. The SCTF is meeting with FAA facility managers, airport sponsors,
community representatives, elected officials, aviation users groups, and the general
public to identify concerns, community impacts, and proposed solutions. The task force
has held town hall meetings at Monterey Park, Torrance and El Segundo.
The SCTF is identifying and evaluating the safety and efficiency of current air traffic
procedures and their noise impacts on affected communities. These concerns are being
prioritized into short term, intermediate, and long -term action items. A plan leading to
completion of the action items is also being developed. You may with to visit our
Internet site at www.awp.faa_goy and click on "Southern California Task Force" for more
information on the group's activity,
The city of Los Angeles is currently studying a number of proposed airfield development
alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The City and the FAA are
preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Ertvironmental Impact Statement
(EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze numerous environmental issues, including noise.
The EIR/EIS process is a public process.
P20G /245
06/17/98 16:49 A'WP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NO.831 pa 09/045
660
E1 Segundo Communitf Meeting
Speaker Request Form
please print Clearly
NAIL
1 E � 5�J
ORGANIZATION (Optional) 6.5 R A'
ADDRESS ly aS" C G /Vj i T"i� srr
PxoNEO
CITY, -
TOPIC 4
7/17/99 16:49 PWP -6
Airport
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a
public process.
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to emure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is,a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air ixaffic control procedures act to turn,
down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the late. Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport, Current
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before
they can be implemented.
09/17/98 16:49 PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
El Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NAME
ORGA11IZATj3?(N (Optiona
ADDRESS_ -75/
CITY,
TOPIC
NO.931 P011i045-
PHONE 31—a (� �(�
28i17i5d 16:45
Pollution/Congestiion
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint EnvironmentO Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EISOR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a
public process.
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA, controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn
down the volume, Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the groi.ind at the other airport. Current
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes. are
required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before
they can be implemented.
F212/245-
06/17/96 16:49 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 310 322 7137
El Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request ]Form
Please print Clearly
NAME
NO.e31 P013/045
J `
ORGANIZATION -5 (Optional) / ' a
ADDRESS 2 4- 4A9 -k1"AJ 5-S ! ;T
CITY, ZIP X4A -)V14 - /A1J .A7W PHONE -316
TOPIC 4Ai<
08/!7/98 16:50 PwP -6 OP5 CENTER
LAX Expansion
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Flan efforts. The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmentfil Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a
public process.
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn
down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures aa °e delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the ;gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before
they can be implemented.
P014/045-
�6i1 i76 16:54 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
zl 6egunao Lommunity Meeting
Speaker Request ]Form
Please print Clearly
/ 1 �
ORGANMATION (Optional)
ADDRESS
CITY, ZIP PHONElD
TOPIC
NO.631 Pa15id4�
06/17/96 16:50 AwP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
. .t
• " LAX
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts, The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmentf►1 Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues, The EIRIEIS process is a
public process.
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn
down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the .gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before
they can be implemented.
P216/24E
09/17/98 16:50 PwP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
El Segundo community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NC.831 P217/24E
(GCiG
NAME
ORGANIZATION (Optional) n
ADDRESS
CITY ZIP L �Q.S c hob r- 900"')HONE 3�0 6 d O q y
TOPIC_ u Q n -
05/17/95 16:50 AWP -6 ORS
LAX Expansion
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The Cite is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Repo tt/Envirornmental
Impact Statement (EISIEIR). The LISUR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a
public process.
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn
down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the ,gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current
aircraft airival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety and environtziental perspective before
they can be implemented.
Pa18%045
08/17/98 16:51 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
El Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NAME
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
ADDRESS
CITY, ZIP yy, .-- �\ l c�.-- �.• PHONE
TOPIC LA 1� t'ro �oSe .LjC�Cu� Qc v�-`
o-
N0.e31 P019i045
k'l/ V
aS%i7 /38 16:51 PWF -6 CPS CENTER 4 310
LAX Proposed Expansion
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The
City and the FAA axe preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a
public process.
T]ae primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impost: restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in tirae the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn
down, the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety anti environmental perspective before
they can be implemented.
P020ia45
e8/17/58 16:51 ASP -6`Oi ovgu uu 310 322 Meeting
'► Speaker Request )Form
Please print Clearly
NAME r Ll tj �
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
ADDRESS 1 t—T� U) AK
N0.631 P221/24
9&
CITY, ZIP 1�-I 5� r�f� (00 e6 PHONE tJ
TOPIC 1 T � _ -U ,4�A �4 -FLA k �J 1 AJ 61
j 29 /17 /9e 16:51 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
Density and Urban Planning
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration, The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS/IrIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a
public process.
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn
down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright,
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate, Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before
they can be implemented.
P222/245
08/17/98 16:51 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
• w ni '3rgulIUU 4,Ull till UllAL.f lvlVVlll1S
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NAME
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
ADDR
CITY,
TOPIC
N0.831 P/023/04�
(Z
09/17/99 16:52 AWP -6 OPS CENTER
Environment /Air Quality
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration, The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EISMIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environ rental issues. The EIRMS process is a
public process.
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport;at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors, If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to tum
down the volume, Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held out the ground at the other airport. Current
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before
they can be implemented.
P024/045
09/17/98 16:52 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
zi 0vr7U11UU VU111j11L41L1LJ Lvi"f,1116
• Speaker Request Form
please print Clearly
NO.631 P225/245
Y -
NANM G [k cC U414 n,S OW
ORGANIZATION (Optional) C L s cG ka bQ F C -s f A Erg I S A S
ADDRESS 114 L C—'- SYCAth 6Aer �1v
CITY$ ZIP- S F [r N CA. PHONE —A
TOPIC w446 WINS I F LA-tw_ AAy2 6 pAOSW -
V((;ws mr- LAk �,�pgNSfONZ
08/17/98 16:52 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322
LAX Expansion
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards, The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EISIEIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a
public process.
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and c;m vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn
down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures Are delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport, Current
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before
they can be implemented.
P026/045
26 /!7i9e 16:52 AWF -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
E1 Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
'lease print Clearly
NAME A4r�l
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
N0.931 F227i245
ADDRESS_ I(�
CITY, ZIP �'1 C a 7 a tiTJ PHO�iE�� �Q ;7
TOPIC O/ S V U/rG1..TZ ��"J�`� �i% t�E,CrP. OW e%%
2e/17/9e 16:52 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322
Noise Vibrations Measurement, Health Concerns
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed recon:5guration. The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master flan efforts. The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EISMIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a
public process.
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace, The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX From a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport'at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn
down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures eve delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Cturent
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before
they can be implemented.
F229/245
29 /17i9e 16:52 AWR -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
Please print Clearly
NAME I// a
E1 Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
NC.e31 P329/045
rry
ADDRESS / - -
CITY, ZIP a c7c /C PHONE 2' 75,` , d
TOPIC_ 1.9 � / A40' �/P X 9'A �°� �`�' „��'
06/17/98 16:53 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
Speaker Request Form
Pleaseprint Clearly
NAND 0 �'
r-- �( cs aRj
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
ADDRESS �- ". B'A S 3 5
NO.B31 F030i0�5
1 �
CITY, ZIP a '`¢-'t ,02�� PHONE
C
TOPIC
�C, f;��
L D CrA�
ac %17/98 16:53 AWP -6 OPS
Against LAX Expansion,
Structural Damages, Environment, Pollution
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues, The EIR/EIS process is a
public process.
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given, point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors. I£ at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn
down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe, If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before
they can be implemented.
Pa31 /24"-
0bi17i9B 16:53 PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
1.1 Jegunao Coll munny 1V1uuting
` Speaker Request Dorm
Please print Clearly
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
ADDRESS"
CITY, ZIP nil PHONES
NO.831 P032i045
�r
drsii'riyt 16 :53 AwP -6 OP5 C6Nl6k
Airport Size, Noise and Safety
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the Layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Flan efforts. The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIRIEIS process is a
public process.
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn
down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAIC can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport, Current
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before
they can be implemented.
2e/17/9e 16:53 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
ZI JGguiluu %'Ummuiuty l�lvv«••�
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NAA
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
ADDRESS
CITY, ZIP PHONE,
, r'6?
TOPIC
NO.e31 P034i045
jg,
et/17i98 16:54 AWP -6
Noise and Air Pollution, Property Rights
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX.) and any proposed reconfiguration. The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS/EIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues, The EIR/EIS process is a
public process.
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX from a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is, a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hoLu
based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in time the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn
down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate, Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe. If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before
they can be implemented,
F2351e4
ae /!7i9e 16:54 AWF -6 OPS CENTER 4 312 322 7137
rl Jegunuo Community IVICCl1I%
14 Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NAME
NO.931 P036i245
ORGANIZATION (Optional) /
ADDRESS � -�.
r P
CITY, ZIP � 1
PHONE 974-7
,
TOPIC ' 'i
IV
4
26/17/96 16 :54
Expansion at George Air Force Base Near
Twenty -Nine Palms and Adelanto
The former George Air Force Base is located in Vietorville, California, approximately
100 road miles from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). The base is now a
civilian airport and is known as Southern California Xnternational Airport (VCV). The
Federal Aviation Administration has issued a Federal Aviation Regulation Part 139
Operating Certificate to VCV. This means the airport is authorized to conduct
commercial passenger operations involving aircraft with 30 seats or more. Passenger
operations by aircraft with less than 30 seats are also authorized, The military currently
charters civilian aircraft to fly troops and equipment into VCV for the purpose of
conducting training maneuvers at nearby Fort Irwin. There are no regularly scheduled
commercial flights available to the general public into and out of VCV. VCV has the
potential to siphon off some of the demand for aviation services that is accommodated by
LAX and other commercial airports in the Los Angles Basin. Market forces will dictate
the level of service that commercial passenger and cargo airlines might chose to provide
at VCV, There are no regulatory measures available that could force growth at VCV.
P237i045
06/17/96 16:54 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
E1 Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NAME \ % 6
AX K)
N0.631 F03d�045
ORGANIZATION (Optional) ! A)�IC 4+t T_ L �4� L).A t AJ&Fvt-�
ADDRESS
CITY, ZIP j q0O qS PHONE 6q.5 o-302,3
TOPIC 6 c�rJ ��n � - t'Dc�a'- N01-91�— L � �
06/17/99 16:54 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322
Sound Contour Noise Levels
The city of Los Angles is responsible for the layout and design of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) and any proposed recontiguration. The City is obligated to
follow basic FAA airfield design standards. The City is currently studying a number of
proposed airfield development alternatives as part of their LAX Master Plan efforts. The
City and the FAA are preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIMIR). The EIS/EIR will analyze safety, noise, air quality, water
quality, traffic and a variety of other environmental issues. The EIR/EIS process is a
public process,
The primary responsibility of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in regards to
the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ensure the safe and efficient use of
navigable airspace. The FAA controls takeoffs and landings at LAX froze a procedural
standpoint, but does not have the authority to impose restrictions on the number of
aircraft operations or the size of the airport. There is a practical capacity to the number of
aircraft operations that can be handled at any airport at any given point in time. The
airport's capacity is not a single fixed number and can vary widely from hour to hour
based on a multitude of factors. If at any point in tinie the demand for takeoffs and
landings reaches the current capacity level, FAA air traffic control procedures act to turn
down the volume. Aircraft arrivals and departures are delayed or cancelled outright.
Aircraft scheduled to depart LAX can be held at the gate. Aircraft scheduled to depart
other airports bound for LAX can be held on the ground at the other airport. Current
aircraft arrival and departure procedures are considered safe, If future changes are
required they must be studied from both a safety and environmental perspective before
they can be implemented.
P239 045
08/17/98 16:54 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.831 P242/24E
El Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker request Form
Please print Cearly
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
ADDRESS 3 W a 1
CG - ►rY. c�.l
CITY,ZIP �� S�c%1�..�v�G1.27 PHONE IrlAY1G {�11 �E'av`.ry,l�N�, h��'
TOPIC l5 G "Yv)� Prc-'o41 ncii 2 � V'Ncme..s ,
Y GY,SOrIrg a
LA v� CAe r 5 � I r <J
w � 5�,,,rtid p roo-�- %ow�C S i ►it � 1 5��+�h�G �,.��C� e. i I, vZ �-�vJ
yv -/ hc,vne� suur�c{ �YOa�ed ?
5
06 /17 /98 16:55 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NO.831 P041i045
Soundproofing of Homes ins El Segundo
Tile city of El Segundo is sponsoring the noise abatement program. Eighty percent of the
funding is provided through a Federal Aviation Administration grant. The contact person
for E1 Segundo's noise abatement program is Harvey Holden, and his telephone number
is (310) 607 -2202,
06/17/96 16:55 PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
N0.631 P042i24E
Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question,
%ve are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and
expressing an interest in aviation safety.
As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo Nigh School on April 28, 1998, the
Soitillet7t California Task Forre -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in
December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned
with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state,
local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southem California, we are
confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with
the need for a community- friendly environment.
if you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please
feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our
Internet site at and click on "Southern California Task Force" for
further information on the group's activities.
9 13
W � � 'ew of , � o�r aA �
VL-�A� +4101W
-2- &kL&b " 1,
t
MR ANDREW STEFANSKI (3[0) 3 3 7 Z
7296 W 85TH ST 4
LOS ANGELES CA 900452431
FMAY 1 9 �g
AlR�'OR�S 0!VlS;O��
OE %i7i98 16:55 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NO.E31 PO43iO45
A — At' V' -T-'r
A
6 iE a 0 — �
"a
pu)oo 11'c tip' r4(
rd-0-4 —
rY, �4.2�•9�
A- ktk�- �ff,
wed
,&�2.WLa4-42,
a,5 C"�► Y` + &xJ t l) ,' 1-4 to 0 C.i-Q vt,_ J
S J44,) 114-1 1�L 's
FE TY Y.
Ll
�'1�'� 1.
2 �.u/ OJ^ "
/Qre -e� �
a L,00�e4�
4v 4x-
1a,4 71 rL17yf /1�1,W�11 Kcx s of vv-{-
4v� ce, `o1cm LAJ ,� J- g,A mmu-0, � �
� w I
we-
ti 1,✓ ©-f
+�l MR ANDREW STEFANSKI
� 7296 W 85TH ST 641
LOS ANGELPS CA 90045 -2431
2E/17/96 16:55 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 310 322 7137 NO.631 P244i24"—
v �
^EEES
.'.II I/L E a
Ir'.n; g` Ilt f a If rill ,� ' :1� w
1f= 1' rw •+' 'tsar � ei vMrnifl �� g a'' rp '� .•,\ 1 ., �yS \ SY19'�0� M I I
�. � � i '� IUY�' en�lilr � r —, ��uinrM F � t ?�, . ��d �JUJ � '\i♦ � I
Q�, f• �� '' �nlln'1M s t _fit �)I�r 1 r111N1
CPA
t �Y
IVO
S feed, i•�� q '? I:y� ,nn� F, �� ,` I:.,t °� '�
n� a \r r,tt ►AQC
_: •� . `� iA11'� �� 7?ly�',� �! ' �rr� / ✓\� , G',, r 4 .a�l�',,, � �t�'�43�� � .I � � ,col.l4
I .i
AO
N
I v JA (1 5
r
iF r- ,itii 11 Ar �IY�inn � � Sl.'ul !c'ne G■ �� (4 y.� � IS,rpl it
Of
syl
r rr w? ���ir �f��. „�,�riaa,� }1, E � I J � Q�i�� {l 3Sf �.-� �� I i��jii1�F� i71 n• �.
,�. �� rprF' 1: env* n •I� w'iut1AM ■ Z■ '�A4! ' �iy1
^ I AV % W f •/Y IA U yr ' 1S r1Y 11 r7 it
_ Y ,' n�i �,Y It ail ,+ 111 G ” `� � liirf i 11 • r �; - � 1 /y�,1 1 pMr AtlrM
..) .fr?., ! •',i �1 tY 1g ;,� ^r � i. ^ 1 f' - � W �'s vj V11 M0`
1 w J '1 I 1 1. v I r s JO ( )• 1� rho YM is C
n rr
X.
1 � a
LU
1411,�It dlota,.s'L } y to 9
1
61 CD Q1µ ;r•l " ��. ^.��3 r V �- ,, Y.,� : �s � rlr
AV Nol
.� � I+ rvlrr
o r . lr `•a,
_ k _� _ �},:I \ 4 b �Inuw �. r �f Lti 4 Q IT 91 Y 111 �t
` I ' f �1 I r i •���
r�i►
AV
ANO
' +AS 1 � d ✓f ;r t� I
at
—1T
(x,.11 «ice i I1
1 1��1 �• � � i�'� /t �O% /Ili_ � — . ^.�-- ---- -• — r ti �
06 /17i9B 16:56 AWP -6 OPS
Safety
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is not aware of any federal regulation that
requires a lateral distance of 1,100 feet from a runway to residential property. There is no
such FAA regulation. FAA standards do identify the need for Runway Protection Zones
(RPZ) off the ends of each runway. The RPZ `s function is to enhance the protection of
people and property on the ground. The RPZ is trapezoidal in shape and centered about
the extended runway centerline. In most cases the RPZ begins 200 feet beyond the end
of the runway. RPZ size is a function of a number of factors. At LAX the inner width of
each RPZ is 1,000 feet, the length is 2,500 feet, and the outer width is 1,750 feet. This is
the maximum R.PZ size required by FAA standards. The RPZ should be clear of
residences and places of public assembly, including schools.
FAA standards also identify the need for a Building Restriction Line (BRL) to identify
suitable building area locations on airports (it is recommended the airport property line
extend at least to the limits of the BRL). At LAX, the, BRLs run parallel to each outboard
runway at a lateral distance of 750 feet from the runway centerline. This meets FAA
standards. The schools in question are outside the BRL. The 'LAX expansion concept
that proposes a new north runway would shift the two existing north runways further
south. The schools would remain outside the BRL even with the addition of a new north
runway.
PO4t /don
AUG. -17' 98(MON) 15:57 ADMIN
TRANSACTION REPORT
Transmission
Transaction(s) completed
TEL:310 322 7137 P. 001
NO.
TX
DATE /TIME
DESTINATION
DURATION
PGS.
RESULT
MODE
742
AUG.
17 15:54
7147555648
0° 01' 30"
005
OK
N ECM
Oct Y O*6
'Lr► _ O
�S�GU�4
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Date: August 18, 1998
Operator's Initials: sm
ow
Bill Dunmore
FROM: James Hansen
Director of Economic Development
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
310 - 607 -2249 FAX: 310- 322 -7137
SUBJECT: Proposed Electronic Communication Policy
FAX NO: 714 - 755 -5648
Total number of pages transmitted (including this one): 5
08/17/96 16:40 PWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
Federal Aviation Administration
Western- Pacific /;legion
Hawthorne, California
Date:
To: ' f % l�-� Gen dYL
From:
No. of pages including cover:
NC.830 P221/224
Phone: (310) 725 -3550 Fax: (310) 536 -8400
,5&t
01 COMMENTS:
Office of fh.
Regional
Administrator
08 /17 /96 16:40
U.S. Department
of Transportotion
Federal Aviation
Administration
1 I (r r»
AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 318 322 7137
Dear Citizen:
office of the Regional Administrator
Western - Pacific Region
NC.630 P002/224
P. 0. Box 92007
Worldway Postal Center
Los Angeles, CA 90009
Thank you for attending the community meeting held at E1
Segundo High School on Tuesday, April 28, 1996.
Enclosed is the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA)
response to the issue you noted that evening on the speaker
request form.
We appreciate your attendance at the meeting and your
interest in aviation safety.
Sincerely,
William C. Withycombe
Regional Administrator
Enclosure
cc: Congresswoman .lane Harman
26/17/96 16:42 AwP -6 CPS CENTER 4 312 322 7137 NC.632 P223i224
E1 Segundo Communitry Meeting
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NAME l
ORGANIZATION (Optional) W eb �� 2e,
ADDRESS
CITY, ZIP PHONE
TOPIC
06i1ri96 16:40 PWP -6 CPS CENTER
Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question,
we are taking this oppommity to thank you for attendv.ig the community meeting and
expressing an interest in aviation safety.
As mentioned by the FAA panel at E1 Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the
Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in
December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned
with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state,
local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are
confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with
the need for a community - friendly environment,
If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please
feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our
Internet site at www.awp.f .gov and click on "Southern California Task Force" for
further information on the group's activities,
P004/224
08/17/98 16:40 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NO.830 P205/224
E1 Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NA UM 1�.� � _ 1:7 C0ocnu��-r�
ORGANIZATION (Optional) Co N Gc z t-� 12E S , ► >c 1-
ADDRESS 'Z.-2-`Y W t-4.) -r ),.j t_-) �T ,
CITY, ZTP S���a �� C 7 G� `�6 N,._PHONE 3 2 2 -qv C, I
I
TOPIg�
t,..(Y.r1 t7 t�1S t o.2 A ►1���A� �R� zU�.�r'l S ,
tV2rJ �q(�, v aS TrtAi' cAVSr= NW$L Vsd9A7' 0vr.1 TT.)
I�t•� t- tur��� rr✓t u-+x%2
7-H,4, AV / Or►Q'
Li
06/17/96 16:40 AWP -6 CPS
Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question,
we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attenduig the community meeting and
expressing an interest in aviation safety.
As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the
Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in
December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communitics concerned
with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state,
local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are
confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with
the need for a community- friendly environment.
If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please
feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our
Internet site at www.awp.faa.gov and click on "Southern California Task Force" for
further information on the group's activities,
P206/224
08i17/9B 16:40 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
E1 Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NO.B30 P007/024
NAME F; wv sf-= A N s i<� I
ORGANIZATION (Optional) Arl"'o r A C
ADDRESS
CITY, ZIP, � SL-PHONEE Y72
2
TOPIC &—c--c—
4
ae /17i98 16:40 AWP -6 OPS CENTER
Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question,
we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and
expressing an interest in aviation safety.
As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on Apri.128, 1998, the
Southern California Task Face -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in
December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned
with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state,
local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are
confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with
the need for a community - friendly environment.
If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information., please
feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our
Internet site at www.a .faa.gov and click on "Southern California Task Force" for
further information on the group's activities.
POOS 024
06/17/98 16:41 PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.830 P023/224
• El Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NAME. Yrli0-
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
AT1T)RFS�
i
S w a kt� 5- ') I--- -
CITY, ZIPTEDUV-) bU Gs �1 PHONE
TaPIC
�.v�,� Fir Gl -17S T��1 vF tPUC-, en,5 T- -1—C au�fS i
/ ?•t�' -- c ��, vv � wL•`; �� ► �1U �n S Cam" t 1••) rtt� i.v A K�'' ✓� lr
08/17/96 16:41 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.630 P012/224
Because your speaker request form didnot indicate a clear or specific topic: or question,
we are taking this oppominity to thank you for attending the community meeting and
expressing an interest in aviation safety.
As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 199S, the
Souther -17 California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvoy in
December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned
with. noise associated witli aviation operations. With the contin,tred cooperation of state,
local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are
confident that the demand of the Amcncan people for safe air travel can be balanced with
the need for a contlnunity- friendly environment,
if you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please
feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our
haternet site at \:v"-%v.awp.faa.gov and click on "Southern California Task Force" for
further information on the group's activities.
08/17/98 16:41 AwP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
El Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Requestform
Please print Clearly
NAME
ORGANIZATION (Optional)_
ADDRESS
CITY, ZIP j9'0
TOPIC
PHONE
ATV
i
NO.e30 P011/224
/'J
06/17/99 16:41 PWP -6
Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question,
we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and
expressing an interest in aviation safety.
As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo high School on April 28, 1998, the
Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in
December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned
with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state,
local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are
confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with
the need for a community- friendly environment.
If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please
feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our
Internet site at www.awp.faa. 0vv and click on "Southern California Task Force" for
further information on the group's activities.
P2121224
08/17/96 16:41 PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
El Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
r1,�1.
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
N0.630 P013/224
�i
/I
ADDRESS -7
CITY, ZIP_ �/ -7 < l�•y ^ 1, d C G G PHONE
TOPIC_ c,•%� %�% c _5 : ( it—,�y c., l ` d >
26/17/98 16:41 AwP -6 OPS CENTER
Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question,
we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and
expressing an interest in aviation safety.
As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the
Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in
December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned
with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state,
local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are
confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with
the need for a community-friendly environment.
If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please
feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our
Internet site at www.av .faa. ov and click on "South, em California Task Force" for
further information on the group's activities.
P214i224
r" s
2B /17 /3e 16:41 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NO.630 P015i024
E1 Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NAME E 9 10- 3-O H NS O N
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
ADDRESS (y 1�( C--. 5?cA r1012C'' A V
CITY, ZIP _L L S L; 6-Y ti A G OU X u'�— PHONE
TOPIC YO u -T L LC
V R N F^
IZhF T`I,
VV2bllNb
okIYLLINe'
A l4 L0 T ��a�?' slaP�� ?'7 4KT' *(�1� `1S
L f 1'V G Q K A J K
Pco NOT' l4_N'arte_ 5AF TY 01V Tti6
Aow ,D v4 lN(1,Lk0&.5 TNT ttAI-WKCS 0�
`D ?AAPr -1C C0N(.lrt7l0Ao- 4�I✓1D TO >c( C
OBi17i9B 16:41 AWP -6 CPS CENTER
Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question,
we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and
expressing an interest in aviation safety.
As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the
Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by }AAA Administrator Jane Garvey in
December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned
with noise associated with aviation operations. With ile continued cooperation of state,
local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are
confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with
the need for a community- friendly environutent.
If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please
feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our
Internet site at www.an.faa.gov and click on ''Southern California Task Force" for
further information on the group's activities.
PC16/024
0e/17/9e 16:42 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
NC.e30 P017/024
c� oo
4'
El Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
,Please print Clearly
NAME
ORGANIZATION (Optional) &jM3 >D
ADDRESS
CITY, ZIP— ��DJ1�JD o gGbf- Gtq— PHONE
TOPIC A015EL 5�
e
08/17/98 16:42 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322
Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question,
we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and
expressing an interest in aviation safety.
As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the
Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by IZAA Administrator Jane Garvey in
December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned
with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state,
local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are
confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with
the need for a community -f iendly environment,
if you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please
feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our
Internet site at w_ww.awp.faa._gov_ and click on "Southern California Task Force" for
further information on the group's activities.
P018/024
08/17/98 16:42 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NC.930 P019i224
E1 Segundo Communit i Meeting
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NAME
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
ADDRESS
CITY, ZIP S ri N �' PHONE / d 670 3 6'.Z Y
TOPIC 5 -: f
A
M
08/17/98 16:42 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question,
we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and
expressing an interest in aviation safety.
As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the
Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in
December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of communities concerned
with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state,
local, county and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are
confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with
the need for a community- fhendly environment.
if you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please
feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our
Internet site at www.awp.faa.gov, and click on "Southern California Task Force" for
further information on the group's activities.
P222/024
05/!7/98 16:42 AWF -S CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NC.d30 Pali
El Segundo Communioi Meeting
Speaker Request Form
please print Clearly
NAME t /5K
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
CITY, ZiP LA PH0NE����
TOPIC
6
08/17/98 16:42 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310
' J 1•
Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question,
we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and
expressing an interest in aviation safety.
As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the
Sauthe, n California ?ask Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in
December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the: citizens of communities concerned
with noise associated with aviation operations. With 1he continued cooperation of state,
local, colmty and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are
confident that the demand of the American people for safe air travel can be balanced with
the need for a community - friendly environment.
If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further informations, please
feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our
Internet site at www.awp.faa.gov and click ou "Southern California Task Force" for
further information on the group's activities.
P022/024
06/17/96 16:43 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
El Segundo Community Meeting
Speaker Request Form
Please print Clearly
NAME I V �
NO.632 P223/224
,.ADO
r
ORGANIZATION (Optional)
ADDRESS
CITY ZIP_ /"t. --9 �Z�[ Z !� PHONE `� 6
TOPIC 1 R (T I
0
39/17i9e 16:43 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310
Because your speaker request form did not indicate a clear or specific topic or question,
we are taking this opportunity to thank you for attending the community meeting and
expressing an interest in aviation safety,
As mentioned by the FAA panel at El Segundo High School on April 28, 1998, the
Southern California Task Force -- commissioned by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey in
December 1997 -- is working diligently to listen to the citizens of cornmuruties concerned
with noise associated with aviation operations. With the continued cooperation of state,
local, cowity and federal officials, as well as the citizens of Southern California, we are
confident that the demand of the American people for :safe air travel can be balanced with
the need for a community- friendly environment.
If you have a specific question or topic for which you desire further information, please
feel write to the FAA at the address on our letterhead. You may also wish to visit our
Internet site at w_ww.awp.faa -90v and click on "Southern California Task Force" for
further information on the group's activities.
P024i024
0ei1Bi98 17:04
0
U.S. Department
of 7rar%sportauon
Federal Avlation
Administration
PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
.f
Edward Mitchell
716 304' Street
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Dear, Mr. Mitchell:
PQ Box 91007
WesternPpdffc Region worldway Postal Center
Los Arogelet CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
Jength. Some very positive and effective proposals havrr, been introduced, Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near fur ,ire you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
compiex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
Alton D. Scot
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western - Pacific Region
25/19/9G 17:04
AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
P.O. Box 92007
WesterrrPadlk Region worldway Postal Center
Los Arg Wes. CA 90009
US. Department
of - rrw%sporiatlon
Federal Aviation
Administration
Y
Paul Mullin
1405 Magnolia Avenue
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Dear, Mr. Mullin:
We received your continents along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced, Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
eery near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the I=AA Web Page at
www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all'Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Tl=k you for your comments.
Sincerely,
Afton D. Sco c
Manager, Air Traffic Operations 13ranch
FAA Western - Pacific Region
08/18/96 17:04 PwP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
WesreR'►PadfiC Rlcfon
d6w
US. Oepar~t
of 7rampartetfon
Federal Aviation
Administration
't
Linda Nichols
434 261" Place
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Dear, Ms. Nichols:
P/0. Boa 920W
Worloway Postal Center
Los Anca elai G 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you than, the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area,
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
con,,plex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of tape initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
Alton D. Scott
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Westerij- Pacific Rcgion
aSi1Si98 17:04
Ow
uS Department
of Transportatan
Federal Avlation
Administration
AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
'If
Barry Weiss
241 Rees Street
Playa del Rey, CA 90293
Dear, Mr. Weiss:
P.D. Box 92007
WestemPadlk Region Worloway Postai tenter
Les Angeles. G 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area,
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near fdture you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report,
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
w%vw.aNvp.faa.gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those Nye are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
to 17. ScottC
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western- Pacific Region
08 /19 /99 17:04 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
06.04 WestefTH adnc Region
LL& Depwtment
of Trw aportatlon
Federal Aviation
Administration
'f
Peggy Stone
408 Sunridge Street
Playa del Rey, CA 90293
Dear, Ms. Stone:
P.O. Box 92007
Worldway Portal Center
LOS Ang elm CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of Elie SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of Fl Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length, Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force, Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force interim Report and again in the Final Report.
�Ve invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
Alton D. Scott
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western - Pacific Region
0B/18/9B 17:05 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 310 322 7137
�� WesterrtPadflc Reglon
US DaPWVTwnt
of Trw%spartatbn
Federal Avlabon
Administration
.f
Douglas Cully
7336 Rindge Avenue
Playa del Rey, CA 90293
Dear, Mr. Cully:
Nc.e60 P207i029
Pa BOX 921W7
Worltlway Postal Center
Los Angeles, CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns, We assure you that, the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
wwvv.awp.faa.gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
OUT community meetings.
Thank you for your comments,
Sincer ly,
Altcn D. Scott -c"
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western - Pacific Region
28 /19 /9B 17:05
rr
US. DepwV►wnt
of TYanziporubon
Federal Aviation
Administration
PWF -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
Joe McFadden
132 Waterview Street
Playa del Rey, CA 90293
Dear, Mr. McFadden:
PD. Box 42007
Western- Pacfnc Reglon Warlawry Poscal Center
Los Angeles, U 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns, We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced, Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Las Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force, Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration,
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
Nvww,awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments,
Sincerely,
A on LD.Scott
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western - Pacific Region
08i1di99 17:05
U.S. Department
of Tranaportatlon
Federal Aviation
Administration
AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
'f
Jack Kenton
835 Dune Street
El Seguendo, CA 90245
Dear, Mr. Kenton:
PA. Box 9200
Westem- PACIFY Region Wortdway Portal Cencer
Lis Angeles, CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Parts and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration,
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa.gov. liere you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments,
Sincerely,
E11 n D, Sco
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Braneli
FAA Western- Pacific Region
08/18/98 1 7:05 AwP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322
r�
u's taepeAment
of Ttarwportation
Federal Avla6an
Administration
.r
Marian Fine
737 West Mariposa Avenue
El Seguendo, CA 90245
Dear, Ms. Fine:
Pa Box 92007
Westernfadnc Rtglon Worldway postal Center
Los Ang e!es, CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue -of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced, Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area,
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa,gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
Alton D. Scott
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western- PaciFic Region
08i18i98 17.06
06.00
t1S Department
of Trw%spartatlon
Federal AVIsOon
Administration
AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
't
Robert Choquette
224 Whiting Street
El Seguendo, CA 94245
Dear, Mr. Choquette:
PA. Box 92007
Westerr�-Padfk Reglan Wortdway P cMal Center
Los Angeles, CA 90W9
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area,
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration,
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task: Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Wage at
www.awp,faa.gov. )Jere you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
Alton D, Scott
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Wcstern -Paeif e Region
0Si18i9B 17 06 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
D WesternPadlk Region
u.S Department
or TransportaWm
Federal Aviation
Administration
�f
John Gaines
441 Kansas Street
El Seguendo, CA 90245
Dear, Mr, Gaines;
P.0- Box 92007
Wonaway Postal Center
Los Angeles, G 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length, Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
auively participating in the task force. Their cooperatil)n has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa.gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings
"thank you for your comments.
Sinc ly,
Alton D. Scott
Manager, Air Traffic Operations I3rinch
FAA Western- Pacific Region
P012i02S
LEi1Bi98 17:05
f 4W
U.S. Department
Cr Transportatbn
Federal Aviation
Administration
ALJP -5 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
Nancy Johns
834 Dune Street
El Seguendo, CA 90245
Dear, Ms. Johns:
PA. Box 92007
Westernwaciflc Region Wortaway Postal Center
LAS Ang eies. CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require ;study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force, Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, the are confident that in the
very near future you wit; notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web page at
w%vw.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings-
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
Alton
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western- Prcil?c region
08/18/98 17:06 PWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
�1 Western-Prdfk Reglon
U.S Department
of pw%sportaWn
Federal Aviation
Adnihstration
'f
Sam Edgerton
44 20" Street
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Dear, Mr. Edgerton:
P.O. Box 920W
WoMawey PostA Center
Los Angeles, CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns, We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of Et Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force I terim Report and again in the Final Report,
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
Alton D Sc
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western - Pacific Region
09/18/99 17:07 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
Ow WauenWadnc Region
Ua Department
of TramportaWn
Federal Aviation
Administration
�f
Sherry Sotres
2011 Manhattan Avenue
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Dear, Ms. Sotres:
PA. Box 92007
Womway Postal Center
Los Angeles, CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task; Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park: and other areas are discussed at
length, Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task- Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
A ton D Scoi�
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western - Pacific Region
P2:Oi029
06 116138 17:07 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.860 P016/228
4W
US Department
of T?ansportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
'r
Anne Sullivan
60 180 Street
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Dear, Ms. Sullivan:
Westernkbacuric Region
P.Q Box 92007
WohGway Postal Cuter
Los "eies, CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns, We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park: and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area..
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force, Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force an the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings,
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
C�
Alton D. Scot
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western - Pacific Region
06/16/96 17:07 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
QWestem�Padnc Region
US. Departrnent
of TYamportaWn
Federal Aviation
Administration
.f
Robert Woodie
430 291h Street
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Dear, Mr. Woodie:
P.O. Box 92007
Worraway Postal Cenrer
Los Angre" a 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.,
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force interim Report and again in the Final Report,
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.fan.gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
oLUr community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Si rely,
�r
Alton D. c t �
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Brancli
FAA Western - Pacific Region
08/18/98 17.07
RWP -6 OPS CENTER
PA. Box 92007
Western,fadrk Regan Warlaway Pascal Center
Los Anq eles, [,A 90009
115. Department
al TransportaWn
Federal Aviation
Administration
Joanne McFarland
6712 West 871" place
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Dear, Ms. McFarland:
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that Nye can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues, Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report,
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our con - nunity meetings.
Thank you for your comments
Sincerely,
1
Alron D. Scott
Nlaugcr, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western - Pacific Region
0Bi18 /ge 17:oe
f5w
US. Department
of Tramportatlon
Federal Aviation
Administration
AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
Mathew Hetz
6211 West 75"' Street
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Dear, Mr. Hetz;
P.O. Box 91007
WesternoPadRC Region Wcrtdway Postal Center
Los Angeles, CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation, has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
\'chile we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web page at
www.awp.faa,gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives %ve have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments,
Sincerely,
�f
Alton . Sco ,
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western- Pacific Region
88/18/98 17:08
0
U,& DepaRmsnt
of Ttansportatton
Federal Avlatlon
Administration
AwP -6 CPS CENTER
Michael Parris
9608 Aviation Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Dear, Mr, Parris:
P.O. Box 92007
Wwtern-PadM Regim Worldway Postal Center
Los Angeles, CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns, We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pur.wing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Parl: and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require Study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp,faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we -,ire studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
Aon got
lt D. S
Mznager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western- PaciFiic Region
29/18/98 17:06 AwP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 NO.e60 P021i22
rr
US Department
Of Transportation
Federal AVtatlon
Administratlon
Joyce Law Krause
4338 Glencoe #1
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Dear, Ms. Krause:
PA. Box 92007
West~adrlc Region Worldway PostM Center
Los Angeles, CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns, We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park: and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
l Sc t
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western - Pacific Rebioli
08/18/98 17:86 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.e60 P022/029
WesterrWadlic Reglon
U.S. Department
of TtanspwUUon
Federal Aviation
Administration
'r
Mike Petach
1209 South Irena
Redono Beach, CA 90278
Dear, Mr. Petach:
PA. Box 920W
Waldway Postal Center
Los Ang ele; CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report,
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
"thank YOU for your comments.
Sincerely,
C� J
/
Alton D Scott
Nfanager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western- Pacific Regioru
a6i18ige 17:09 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137 N0.860 P023/229
e2w
US. Depwterwnt
of Ttansportabon
Federal Aviation
Administration
Alan Whitson
2210 Fisher CT
Redono Beach, CA 90278
Dear, Mr. Whitson:
PA. Box 920M
westernf,adfk Region Waldway Posh Center
tag /kgeles LA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns,
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park: and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near furire you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa,gov. Here you will find the minutes of a l Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we rice studying, as Nvell as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
Alt n D. cot
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western- Pacific Region
08/18/98 17:09 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
US. Department
of Tran9portatlon
Federal Aviation
Administration
.f
Robert Acherman
6055 West 750' Place
Westchester, CA 90045
Dear, Mr, Acherman:
WeitertrPadflc Region
Ra Box 92007
Worloway Postal Center
Los Angeles G 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California (SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of £1 Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park: and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost oll of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many oC the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings,
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
r
r
AltcA n. Cott e
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western- Pacific Region
P024/223
08/18/98 17:09
US. Department
of TrwwportAtlon
Foderal Aviation
Administration
AUG 1 5 1998
AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
Giwa Neusterer Koshak
7941 Altavan Avenue
Westchester, CA 90045
Dear, Ms. Koshak:
P.O. Box 92007
WestentiPadfk Reglon worldway PosuM Center
tos Angeles, CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have: been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration,
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our conununity meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sinc ,
Alto D, Scott
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western - Pacific Region
08 %18/98 17:09
rr
US Depwtrnant
of Trw%sportatbn
Federal Aviatlon
Administration
AWP -6 CPS
V
Bruce Lathrop
7573 West SP Street
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Dear, Mr. Lathrop:
Pp, aox 920W
We$terTWadnC Reglon WalCway Postal Center
Los Angeles. CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area,
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force; on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp.faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
Alton U. Scot
Mar►aoer, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western- Pacific Region
08/18/98 17:10 AWP -6 CPS CENTER 4 310 322
'I western-Facile Reglcn
Lia Depwtnent
of Trwzportation
Federal Aviation
Adrv1 Nstretion
I
Harry A. Ford, Jr.
54 Village Circle
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Dear, Mr. Ford:
Pja aox 920W
%VmWway Postal Center
Los Angeles, [A 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pur,uing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of FI Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have: been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp,faa.gov, Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
VnD -r t r Alto. Scott
Manager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western- Pacific Region
P227/22S
08/18/98 17:10 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 4 310 322 7137
WesterrtPadric Region
oil
U.S. DepaAment
of Transport$Wm
Federal Aviatlon
Administration
't
John Pasterczyk
1500 23" Street
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Dear, Mr. Pasterczyk;
N0.860 ?028/029
p.o. Box 92007
WWC3Way Pasta! Center
Los Angeles. CA 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns, We assure you that;the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park; and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require ;;tudy to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration.
While we cannot promise that We can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you will notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues. Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force interim Report and again in the Final Report.
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp,faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetings
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
on D- S o, 5
Manager, Air "traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western - Pacific Region
08/18/98 17:10 AWP -6 OPS CENTER 310 322 7137
us DepwtTwnt
or 'aw%sportatbn
Federal Aviation
Administration
V
Ron Haconhen
436 Third Street
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Dear, Mr. Haeonhem:
western.-Fadfk fieglon
NO.860 P029/023
PD. Box 92001
worldway Postal Center
LOS " eles, G 90009
We received your comments along with many others from people in the surrounding
communities with similar concerns. We assure you that the Federal Aviation Administration's
(FAA) Southern California ( SOCAL) Task Force is pursuing many avenues to alleviate many
of your concerns.
At every meeting of the SOCAL Task Force, the issue of aircraft overflight of El Segundo, the
Beach cities, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Monterey Park and other areas are discussed at
length. Some very positive and effective proposals have been introduced. Some of these
proposals have been implemented, while others require study to determine the overall impact
on the management of air traffic in the Los Angeles area.
Representatives from the airline industry, airport operators, and surrounding communities are
actively participating in the task force. Their cooperation has been essential in helping us
develop the proposals under consideration,
While we cannot promise that we can mitigate every noise issue, we are confident that in the
very near future you Nvill notice an improvement, as we continue to address many of these
complex issues, Almost all of your concerns will be addressed in the soon- to -be- published
Task Force Interim Report and again in the Final Report,
We invite you to follow the progress of the Task Force on the FAA Web Page at
www.awp,faa.gov. Here you will find the minutes of all Task Force meetings, which include
many of the initiatives we have implemented, those we are studying, as well as minutes from
our community meetino5.
Thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
Alton D. Scott
M,<nager, Air Traffic Operations Branch
FAA Western - Pacific Region
