A079-It-7
AGREEMENT OF SALE AND FURCHAW52
io
DEXTER TAM BENSON and GLO R* SENSJ%
S AGREENEUT, entered into 9t El '°egtzas of California*
the jai' �� 19Js be wen CITY OF i aWtl, a
unicipal corporations hereinafter called Vendor, and DT)M K.
6030N d OLGA R. 6FTSON4 busband mad uaifes *a joint tenants,
hereinafter called vAndou
� ITNESSlTao that Vondor and Vendee agree, as followaz
(1) That Vendor, in consideration of the sownaanta anA
Lots 5 and €7, ilook As El Segundo* as per took 15*
Fa8es 69 of maps, aecords of Los Angeles County,
x.11
(2) Time is of the essonee of tUa agreemont., and in
(4) The condition of titlo to said real property- ssi'rall
(5) This , ament 11 >mll be k Indinj; upon a-rzd Inure to
the bo ef"it of Vendor and Vendee and their respoetive injooaassore
In interest.
the plural and the words FVendorl' and "Vendee" shall include the
Y : fl v v k (. •.. m * .. Interest eaclij whenever context
-2m
Iii WITNES x" wnrigopp this above municipal corporation has#
7 O
..3..
corporsation#
BY, myor O
DEAaft?
i;.. s3L.tsUsd
IAA =3. B
Feb. 24, 1955,
John R. Quinn, County Assessor
County of Los Angeles
155 West Washington Blvd.
Los Angeles 15, California
Dear Sir:
April 29, 1953, the City of E1 Segundo quitclaimed to
Dexter Ke and Olga R. Benson, husband and wife, Lots 5
and 60 Block 15,, El Segundo, which property was tax
deeded and sold on a contract basis to Mr. and Mrs„ Benson.
Evidently this office failed to notify you of the fact
that a deed had been given to the purchasers, inasmuch as
their tax bill covering said property still bears a
notation to the effect that such property is subject to
interest of the City of El. Segundo in the fee title.
Will you please correct your records accordingly, so that
this notation may be eliminated on future bills, and
oblige.
Very truly yours,
City Clerk.