ORDINANCE 1457ORDINANCE NO. 1457
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING EL SEGUNDO MUNICIPAL CODE §§ 6-
2-13, 6 -3 -2, 6 -3 -3, 6 -3 -6, 6 -5 -5 AND 6 -5 -6 REGARDING THE
REGULATION OF ANIMALS WITHIN THE CITY'S JURISDICTION.
The Council of the City of El Segundo does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC ") § 6 -2 -13 is amended to read as follows:
"6 -2 -13: CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL: The director may issue or renew the
permit if:
A. Issuing a permit will not adversely affect the public peace, health or safety;
B. Keeping of the animal will not violate any applicable laws; and
C. That the facilities for keeping such animals are humane and adequate under the
circumstances as to noise, security and sanitation."
SECTION 2: ESMC § 6 -3 -2 is amended to read as follows:
"6 -3 -2: LICENSE TAGS:
A. Contents: Each year the city will procure a sufficient number of suitable metallic
license tags to meet the requirements of this chapter.
B. Duplicate: The city council will by resolution establish a fee for issuing a license
and metallic tag to replace a lost license or tag.
C. Affixing To Dog Collar: The owner of any dog upon which the license fee has
been paid will securely fasten the metallic license tag upon a suitable collar and
securely fasten the collar with the tag attached thereto upon the dog. A dog
harness or other device may be substituted in lieu of the collar, if so desired."
SECTION 3: ESMC § 6 -3 -3 is amended to read as follows:
"6 -3 -3: LICENSE APPLICATIONIRENEWAL: The city will print a sufficient
number of applications to meet the requirements of this chapter. The applications will
provide for the description of the dog for which the license fee is paid and the name and
address of the owner of the dog. The receipts will also designate the rabies vaccination
date and the sex of the dog for which the license fee has been paid."
SECTION 4: ESMC § 6 -3 -6 is amended to read as follows:
"6 -3 -6: RABIES CONTROL:
Page 1 of 7
A. Vaccination Required; Exception: Every dog in the city over the age of four (4)
months must be vaccinated against rabies
B. Revaccination:
Every person keeping, harboring or having a dog in the city that has been
vaccinated with chick embryo vaccine will cause the dog to be
revaccinated within a period of not more than two (2) years after the prior
vaccination.
2. Every person keeping, harboring or having a dog in the city which has
been vaccinated with tissue phenolized vaccine will cause the dog to be
revaccinated with rabies vaccine within a period of not more than one year
after the prior vaccination.
C. Vaccination Certificate Issuance: Every person practicing veterinary medicine in
the city who vaccinates a dog with rabies vaccine will issue to the person keeping,
harboring or having the dog a certificate, which is signed by the veterinarian and
which states thereon the name and description of the dog, the date of the
vaccination and the type of vaccine used.
D. Certificate: Every person applying for a dog license will exhibit a rabies
vaccination certificate issued by a person licensed by the state or any other state
or nation to practice veterinary medicine, which certificate will show that the dog
for which the license will be issued either:
Was vaccinated in accordance with this chapter; or
Should not be vaccinated with rabies vaccine by reason of age, infirmity
or other disability, which disability is shown on the face of the certificate
and to the satisfaction of the person issuing the license to be in effect at
the time."
SECTION 5: ESMC § 6 -5 -5 is amended to read as follows:
"6 -5 -5: IMPOUNDMENT OF DOG WITHOUT TAG.
A. The director may capture and impound any dog found within the city limits that is
not wearing a valid license tag conforming to the provisions of this chapter.
B. The director may enter private property in accordance with applicable law to
examine or capture any dog suspected of being in violation of the provisions of
this code or is suspected of being rabid or infected with rabies."
SECTION 6: ESMC § 6 -5 -6 is amended to read as follows:
Page 2 of 7
"6 -5 -6: DANGEROUS DOGS; IMPOUNDMENT; HEARING:
A. Impoundment: Whenever any dog is, in the written opinion of the director,
vicious, dangerous, potentially dangerous or apt to bite or injure any person, and
is kept in such manner as to constitute an apparent menace to any person, the dog
may be immediately impounded by the director.
B. Notice of Impoundment.
1. The director must provide written notice to the owner /guardian of the
specific behavior of the animal alleged in the petition and the date upon
which a hearing will be held to consider the petition. The hearing must be
held promptly within no less than five working days nor more than ten
working days after service of notice upon the owner /guardian of the
animal as set forth by the Food and Agricultural Code § 31621. The notice
must advise the owner /guardian of the consequences of a finding of
potentially dangerous or vicious.
2. Where the owner /guardian's address of any animal is unknown, notice of
the hearing must be given by posting the same in the Police Department
and by publication in a newspaper of general circulation. Notice must then
be deemed given on publication of the notice.
C. Hearing; Procedures. A hearing on whether a dog is declared potentially
dangerous or vicious must be conducted in the following manner:
If the director has investigated and determined that probable cause exists
to believe that a dog is potentially dangerous or vicious, a hearing must be
conducted. The director must prepare a petition specifying the basis as to
why the dog is potentially dangerous or vicious.
2. Whenever possible, any complaint received from a member of the public
which serves as the evidentiary basis for the director to find probable
cause must be sworn to and verified by the complainant and must be
attached to the petition.
The city manager, or designee, must designate a hearing officer. The
hearing officer must conduct a hearing on whether a dog must be declared
potentially dangerous or vicious.
4. The hearing must be open to the public and the hearing officer may admit
into evidence all relevant evidence, and exercise the full scope of authority
set forth in Food and Agricultural Code § 31621.
A hearing may be continued if the hearing officer deems it necessary and
Page 3 of 7
proper or upon a showing of good cause.
6. If the owner /guardian fails to appear at the hearing, the hearing will
nevertheless proceed and an appropriate order must be issued.
7. The hearing officer must consider all relevant responsible evidence
without regard to the formal rules of evidence, including circumstances of
mitigation, and the record of any prior violations by the owner /guardian.
8. The hearing officer must issue a written determination based upon a
preponderance of the evidence, which must be mailed to the
owner /guardian within seven days after the hearing is completed.
9. The hearing officer's decision is final. There is no right to a city council
appeal.
D. Designation of Animal. If an animal is found to be potentially dangerous or
vicious by a preponderance of the evidence, the animal must be so designated on
the records of the animal services agency. Such a designation must be considered
in future determinations involving the animal and /or owner /guardian.
E. Surrender Of Dangerous Dog: Any dog declared after a hearing to be dangerous,
if not already impounded by the department, will be immediately surrendered to
the department.
F. Microchipping Before Release: If at the conclusion of the hearing the hearing
officer determines that the dog will be released, the dog must have a microchip
imbedded subcutaneously in accordance with industry standards before being
released to the owner. The microchipping will be at the owner's expense.
G. Waiver. The owner of a dog for which a potentially dangerous petition has been
issued may irrevocably waive rights to a hearing and any further appeal under
Food and Agricultural Code § 31622 and accept all conditions, sanctions and
penalties set forth in Food and Agricultural Code §§ 31641, 31642 and 61643.
The director will mail a waiver form to the dog owner /guardian. The waiver must
be signed by the dog owner /guardian and received by the director within thirty
days from the date of agreement to waive or a hearing will be scheduled within
thirty days of the agreement to waive.
H. Additional Fees.
In accordance with Food and Agricultural Code § 31641, the
owner /guardian of a potentially dangerous dog must in addition to the
regular licensing fee, pay to the city an annual fee as may be established
by city council resolution for the increased costs of maintaining the
records of the dog.
Page 4 of 7
2. The owner /guardian of a dog determined to be vicious must, in addition to
the regular licensing fee, pay to the city an annual fee as may be
established by separate city council resolution to provide for the increased
costs of maintaining the records of the dog.
Registration of Animal. The owner /guardian of a vicious dog must, within ten
days of such determination, upon request by the city present said animal at the
animal services agency and allow photographs and measurements of the animal to
be taken for purposes of identification.
Undesignation of Animal.
The owner /guardian of a dog found potentially dangerous, who has no
additional violations of any of the provisions of this title, within a thirty -
six -month period from the date of designation as potentially dangerous,
must be removed from the list of potentially dangerous dogs by the
director. The dog may be, but is not required to be, removed from the list
of potentially dangerous dogs before the expiration of the thirty- six -month
period if the owner /guardian of the dog demonstrates to the director that
changes in circumstances or measures taken by the owner /guardian, such
as training of the dog, mitigated the risk to public safety.
2. The owner /guardian of a dog found vicious, who has no additional
violations of any of the provisions of this title, after a thirty- six -month
period from the date of designation as vicious, may apply to the director to
remove the animal from the list of vicious animals. The director has the
discretion to remove the animal from the list of vicious animals upon
proof of the successful completion of at least eight weeks of formal
obedience training, other similar evidence of training, or other
rehabilitative efforts designed to mitigate the risk to public safety."
SECTION 7: Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by
a court of competent jurisdiction, the city council intends that such invalidity will not affect the
effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end; the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable.
SECTION 8: Limitations. The City Council's analysis and evaluation of the project is based on
the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a project that absolute
and perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the project will not exist. One of the major
limitations on analysis of the project is the City Council's lack of knowledge of future events. In
all instances, best efforts have been made to form accurate assumptions. Somewhat related to
this are the limitations on the City's ability to solve what are in effect regional, state, and
national problems and issues. The City must work within the political framework within which
it exists and with the limitations inherent in that framework.
Page 5 of 7
SECTION 9: Ongoing Prosecution. Repeal or amendment of any provision of the ESMC will
not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude prosecution and
imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before this Ordinance's effective date. Any
such repealed part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting
violations occurring before the effective date of this Ordinance.
SECTION 10: Reversion. If this entire Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court
of competent jurisdiction, any repeal of the ESMC or other City Ordinance by this Ordinance
will be rendered void and cause such ESMC provision or other the city ordinance to remain in
full force and effect for all purposes.
SECTION 11: Recordation. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of
this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City of E1 Segundo's book of original ordinances;
make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within fifteen (15)
days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be published or posted in
accordance with California law.
SECTION 12: Effectiveness. This Ordinance will become effective on the thirty -first (31st) day
following its passage and adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21s` day of De
ric Busch, Mayor
Page 6 of 7
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify
that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 1457 was duly introduced by said City Council at a regular meeting held on the
7`h day of December, 2010, and was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and
signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said Council
held on the 21" day of December, 2010, and the same was so passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES: Busch, Fisher, Brann, Fuentes, Jacobson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ti
Cindy M tesen, City Jerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. y Attorne
By:
Mark Hensley, City Attorney
Page 7 of 7