Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
CC RESOLUTION 4729RESOLUTION NO. 4729
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 836; ADOPTING
A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE
AQUATICS SITE FEASIBILITY ALTERNATIVES PROJECT WITH
POTENTIAL MUNICIPAL SWIMMING POOL LOCATIONS AT 301
MARYLAND STREET, 530 EAST IMPERIAL AVENUE, AND 219 WEST
MARIPOSA AVENUE; AND DETERMINING THAT THE EXISTING
RESERVOIR STRUCTURE AT 301 MARYLAND STREET IS NOT A
LOCAL CULTURAL RESOURCE.
The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares that:
A. In August 2005, the City completed an Aquatics Master Plan that set out
goals to address the City's current and future aquatic facilities needs. A
true and correct copy of the 2005 Aquatics Master Plan is on file with the
Department of Planning and Building Safety and is incorporated by this
reference;
B. On December 16, 2008 the City Council awarded a consultant contract to
produce an Pool Alternatives Study to evaluate site feasibility and site
selection for new municipal aquatics facilities;
C. On April 20, 2009, the City of El Segundo filed an application for an
Environmental Assessment (EA No. 836) to review the EI Segundo
Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project for compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) at three potential locations;
301 Maryland Street, 530 East Imperial Avenue and 219 West Mariposa
Avenue;
D. The City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.,
"CEQA "), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of
Regulations § §15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines "), and the City's
Environmental Guidelines (City Council Resolution No. 3805, adopted
March 16, 1993);
E. In addition, the application was reviewed by the City's Planning and
Building Safety Department for, in part, consistency with the General Plan
and conformity with the El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC ");
F. The Department of Planning and Building Safety completed its review and
scheduled a public hearing regarding the application before the Planning
Commission on July 14, 2011;
G. On July 14, 2011 the Planning Commission held a public hearing to
receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the Project
including, without limitation, information provided to the Planning
Commission by City staff and public testimony;
H. The Planning Commission considered the information provided by, without
limitation, City staff and public testimony. The Planning Commission
adopted Resolution No. 2699 recommending certification of the final
Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the proposed project. The
Planning Commission also recommended that the City Council determine
that the existing reservoir structure at Hilltop Park that is no longer in use
is not a local cultural resource. That Resolution, and its findings, were
made based upon the evidence presented to the Commission at its July
14, 2011 hearing including, without limitation, the staff report submitted by
the Department of Planning and Building Safety;
On August 16, 2011, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing
in the Council Chamber of the El Segundo City Hall, 350 Main Street to
receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the applications
including, without limitation, information provided to the City Council by
City Staff and public testimony; and
J. The City Council considered the information provided by, without
limitation, City Staff and public testimony. This Resolution, and its
findings, are made based upon the evidence presented at the Planning
Commission at its July 14, 2011 hearing; and at the City Council hearing
on August 16, 2011 including, without limitation, the staff reports submitted
by the Planning and Building Safety Department.
SECTION 2: Factual Findings and Conclusions. The City Council finds that the
following facts exist:
A. The El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project consists of
environmental evaluation of three subject sites: 301 Maryland (Hilltop
Site) in the Open Space (O -S) and Public Facilities (P -F) Zones, 530 East
Imperial Avenue (Imperial Site) in the Planned Residential Development
(PRD) Zone; and 219 West Mariposa Avenue (Urho Saari Site) in the
Open Space (O -S) and Public Facilities (P -F) Zones;
B. The proposed project consists of two options at the Hilltop Site. Option 1
is a 40 -meter long, 25 -yard wide competition pool with associated
2
bleacher seating and bathhouse. Option 2 consists of a new competition
pool and a new recreation pool as well as additional supporting facilities;
C. The proposed project consists of two options at the Imperial Site. Option
1 is a 40 -meter long, 25 -yard wide competition pool with associated
bleacher seating and bathhouse. Option 2 consists of a new competition
pool and a new recreation pool as well as additional supporting facilities;
D. The proposed project consists of one option at the Urho Saari Site. This
option consists of renovation and expansion of the existing aquatics facility
at the Urho Saari Swim Stadium. A new outdoor 40 meter long, 25 -yard
wide competition pool with bleacher seating and shade structures would
be sited north of the existing indoor pool building. The existing indoor
facility would be converted into a new recreation pool and therapy pool.
Existing restrooms and change areas would be renovated and additional
supporting facilities including a new mechanical room, office and storage
space would be added to the facility;
E. The 2.11 -acre Hilltop Site is surrounded by the following land uses: A City
Public Works Water Division yard to the north, multi - family residences to
the east, multi - family residences, a church and school to the south, and
single family residences, a daycare and church facilities to the west;
F. The 1.34 -acre Imperial Site Option 1 and 2.2 -acre Imperial Site Option 2
are surrounded by a City linear park and LAX to the north, multi - family and
single family residences to the east, the rest of the Imperial School site
and multi - family residences to the south, and a mortuary and single family
residences to the west;
G. The 1.19 -acre Urho Saari Site is bound to the north, west and east by
Richmond Street Elementary school and by a church and single and multi-
family residences to the south;
H. Uses and structures on the Hilltop Site are currently comprised of: an
approximately 170 foot by 100 foot empty water reservoir which is no
longer in use, an approximately 40 foot by 30 foot recreation pool with an
three -foot maximum depth, a restroom /maintenance building, a
playground with play structures, a paved picnic area and green park space
with picnic tables and barbeques;
The Imperial Site is developed with one -story brick classroom and office
buildings for the no longer operating Imperial Avenue School;
J. The Urho Saari site is developed with the Urho Saari Swim Stadium (aka
"The Plunge "). This building contains two indoor pools, restrooms with
3
showers, locker rooms, bleacher seating, management offices and
storage /maintenance space. The project site would expand outside the
current Plunge building to include Richmond Street Elementary School
areas currently occupied by green space and a playground; and
K. Vehicle access to the Imperial Site would occur from Imperial Avenue.
Access to a new proposed parking lot at the Hilltop Site would occur from
Grand Avenue. Access to two new surface lots at the Urho Saari site
would occur from Mariposa Avenue. In addition two satellite parking
locations, the municipal parking structure at Grand Avenue and Richmond
Street and the public surface lot at Mariposa Avenue and Main Street,
have been identified for the Urho Saari Site.
SECTION 3: Environmental Assessment. The City Council makes the following
environmental findings:
A. A Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for this project was
completed in compliance with Public Resources Code (PRC) §15090. A
noticed Public Scoping meeting was held on Wednesday, May 12, 2010
pursuant to PRC §15083. A Notice of Preparation of the DEIR was
prepared and circulated for public review from July 1, 2010 to August 2,
2010 pursuant to PRC §15082. A Notice of Completion for the DEIR was
filed with the State Office of Planning and Research on April 28, 2011
pursuant to PRC §15085. The public comment and review period for the
DEIR was open between April 28, 2011 and June 13, 2011 in compliance
with PRC §15087;
B. The City received 8 comment letters on the DEIR from public agencies
and individuals;
C. A FEIR was prepared, which includes the DEIR, comments regarding the
DEIR and written responses to such comments, a summary of changes to
the DEIR and all technical appendices;
D. The FEIR for the proposed Project, entitled "El Segundo Aquatics Site
Feasibility Alternatives Project Final Environmental Impact Report",
prepared by Rincon Consultants under contract to the City and under the
supervision of the Planning and Building Safety Department (State
Clearinghouse No. 2010071005), is incorporated by reference;
E. The City, acting as lead agency, reviewed and edited as necessary the
DEIR and the FEIR to reflect its own independent judgment to the extent
of its ability, including reliance on City technical personnel as well as other
professional consultants retained by the City in order to provide technical
4
advice and assistance in evaluating environmental impacts associated
with the Project;
F. Pursuant to PRC § 21082.1(c)(3), the City Council independently reviewed
and analyzed the FEIR. Based upon that review and analysis, and
recommendations made by the City's Planning Agency as set forth in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2699, the City Council finds that the
FEIR is an accurate and complete statement of the potential
environmental impacts resulting from the Project. The FEIR reflects the
City's independent judgment as lead agency;
G. Pursuant to PRC § 15091, any changes or alterations required for the
Project, or incorporated into the Project, which avoid or substantially
lessen the significant environmental effect are identified for the FEIR. Any
potential changes or alterations that may be made to the proposed
mitigation measures are addressed and analyzed in the FEIR;
H. The DEIR and FEIR were made available for public review and comment
in the time and manner prescribed by CEQA;
In accordance with PRC §15091, the record on which the City Council
findings are based is located at the Planning and Building Safety
Department, City of El Segundo, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, California
90245. The custodian of records is the Director of Planning and Building
Safety;
J. The City reviewed the FOR for the Project and considered the public
record on the project, including, without limitation, the following:
1. Staff reports prepared by the Planning and Building Safety
Department and the DEIR and the FEIR prepared by Rincon
Consultants for the City;
2. Staff presentations at public hearings and meetings;
3. All applicable regulations and codes;
4. Public comments, both written and oral, received and /or
submitted at or before the public hearings and meetings,
supporting or opposing the proposed Project; and,
5. All related documents received and /or submitted at or before the
public hearings;
9
K. The FEIR was presented to the City Council, which reviewed and
considered information contained in the FEIR before approving the project
in accordance with PRC §15090;
L. The FEIR generally identifies, for each potentially significant impact of the
project, one or more corresponding mitigation measures to reduce impacts
to a level of insignificance, with the exception of cultural resource and
noise impacts. The City Council finds that each potentially significant
impact identified in the FEIR is mitigated by its corresponding mitigation
measures to the extent set forth in the FEIR;
M. In accordance with PRC §15091, the City Council considered written
findings regarding each of the significant environmental effects identified
in the DEIR before certification of the FEIR. The written findings are
attached as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and incorporated by reference.
Each finding includes a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding.
The FEIR includes mitigations that lessen identified significant
environmental effects to a less than significant level for those effects that
can be mitigated. For the two environmental effects that cannot be
mitigated to a less than significant level (Cultural Resources and Noise) as
identified in the FEIR, the findings attached in Exhibit "A" contain a brief
explanation as to how the mitigation measures substantially lessen the
two substantial environmental effects, and;
N. Because of the effects identified in this Resolution, specifically the creation
of significant environmental impacts as described above, the FEIR found
that a Statement of Overriding Considerations would be required for any of
the alternatives studied to be approved. A Statement of Overriding
Consideration is included in "Exhibit A" in accordance with PRC §15093.
The City Council has considered the attached Statement of Overriding
Considerations.
SECTION 4: General Plan. The proposed project conforms to the City's General Plan
as follows:
A. Implementation of the project will meet relevant goals of the Land Use
Element. Implementation of the project will help achieve Land Use
Element Goal LU6, which is to "maintain and upgrade existing excellent
parks, recreation, and open space facilities within the City of El Segundo."
The new facility will upgrade the level of aquatics facilities service within
the City. A California Interscholastic Federation competition ready pool
will provide training and game facilities that are currently unavailable in the
community with current aquatics facilities. The new competition and
recreation pools will increase aquatics facility capacity in the City
improving service levels to residents.
R
B. Implementation of the project is consistent with Land Use Element Policy
LU6 -1.2 to "encourage parks and recreational facilities to be located within
walking distance of every household." All three potential project sites are
located within the residential section of the City. All three sites are within
a reasonable walking distance of many households residing in the City.
C. Land Use Element Goal LU7 is to "provide the highest quality public
facilities, services, and public infrastructure possible to the community."
The new facility increases the quality of aquatics recreational facilities in
the City. The existing Urho Saari Swim Stadium aquatics facility is
currently deteriorating and is in need of extensive repair and retrofitting.
Providing new or renovated aquatics facilities is needed to continue to
provide high quality public aquatics facilities to the community.
D. Implementation of the project is consistent with Open Space and
Recreation Element Goal OS1 to "provide and maintain high quality open
space and recreational facilities that meet the needs of the existing and
future residents and employees within the City of El Segundo." The facility
meets the needs of the City's residents and employees in that it provides
high quality recreational swim facilities within the City. In addition the
building will improve the facilities available to local schools for competitive
swimming and water polo. The project will also improve facilities available
for child and adult aquatics teaching.
E. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CR -1(a) at the Hilltop Park Site
requiring a cultural resource documentation report by a historic
preservation specialist is consistent with Land Use Element Policy LU2 -
2.1 to "take an active role in documenting and preserving buildings of
cultural, historical and architectural significance. This should include
residential, non - residential and publicly -owned buildings."
F. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CR -1(b) at the Urho Saari Site
requiring review of architectural plans by a qualified historic preservation
specialist for conformance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards
for Rehabilitation is consistent with Land Use Element Objective LU2 -2 to
"encourage the preservation of historical and cultural sites and
monuments" and Policy LU2 -1 that "new development adjacent to a
building of cultural, historical, or architectural significance shall be
designed with a consistent scale and similar use of materials."
G. Implementation of Mitigation Measure N -3(a) and N -3(b) requiring noise
screening of roof -top equipment and restricted hours of trash pick -up is
consistent with Noise Element Objective N1 -2 to "ensure that City
residents are not exposed to stationary noise levels in excess of El
7
Segundo's Noise Ordinance standards."
H. Implementation of Mitigation Measure T -2(a) requiring a Construction
Traffic Management Plan is consistent with Air Quality Element Policy
AQ7 -1.1 that "commercial truck emission be reduced by restricting
delivery schedules to off -peak traffic periods."
SECTION 5: Cultural Resource Designation. The City Council makes the following
findings regarding the potential local cultural resource designation of the existing
reservoir that is no longer in use at Hilltop Park:
A. On July 14, 2011 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2699 which
recommends that the City Council determine that the existing, unused,
reservoir at Hilltop Park is not a local cultural resource;
B. The existing, unused, reservoir is located within the City of El Segundo at
Hilltop Park. The address of Hilltop Park is 301 Maryland Street. The
legal description of the parcel on which the reservoir is located is:
EL SEGUNDO LOT COM AT NE COR OF LOT 13 BLK 67
TH S ON W LINE OF MARYLAND ST TO N LINE OF
GRAND AVE TH W ON SD N LINE TO E LINE OF LOMITA
ST TH N THEREON 704.36 FT TH N 89 53'45" E 143.11 FT
TH S 0 07' LOT 13;
C. The existing, unused, reservoir at Hilltop Park is a concrete basin
approximately 170 by 100 feet in size. It is currently hidden behind a
landscaped berm and is surrounded by a chain -link perimeter fence. The
reservoir was constructed circa 1912 as the City's first reservoir. When
the reservoir was in use it was covered by a wood roof structure which has
since been removed;
D. The integrity of the design of the structure is substantially reduced as the
roof structure is no longer intact. The integrity of feeling and association
of the structure is no longer intact as the structure is no longer used for its
intended purpose, water storage. The structure appears to lack sufficient
integrity to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places
or the California Register of Historical Resources;
E. The reservoir structure meets two of the four criteria for potential
designation as a local cultural resource contained in ESMC §15- 14-4B.
First, the structure is greater than 50 years old and, second, the structure
is associated with a significant local event as it is the City of El Segundo's
first water reservoir and was integral to the establishment of the City;
FP
F. The City Council finds, while the reservoir is associated with a significant
local event, the structure does not have distinctive architecture or method
of construction, does not exemplify a particular period of local history, and
does not provide aesthetic or recreational benefits to the City; and,
G. The City Council finds that reservoir site poses a potential public safety
hazard in its current unmaintained condition. The fencing around the site
is necessary to maintain public safety and renders the site is un-
accessible to the public. As a result, the reservoir has little utility as a
local cultural resource.
SECTION 6: Approvals.
A. The City Council adopts Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding
Considerations in accordance with the requirements of PRC §21081 as set
forth in attached Exhibit "A," which are incorporated into this Resolution by
reference.
B. In accordance with the requirements of PRC §21081(a) and §21081.6, the
City Council adopts a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)
as set forth in attached Exhibit "B," which is incorporated into this Resolution
by reference. The City Council hereby adopts each of the mitigation
measures expressly set forth herein as conditions of approval of the project.
The other project conditions of approval and compliance with applicable
codes, policies, and regulations will further assure that the environmental
impacts of the proposed project will not be greater than set forth in the FEIR
and these findings.
C. Subject to the conditions listed in attached Exhibit "C," which are incorporated
into this Resolution by reference, the City Council certifies the Final
Environmental Impact Report for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility
Alternatives Project.
D. Pursuant to ESMC §15 -14 -4 the City Council determines that the reservoir
structure at Hilltop Park is not a local cultural resource.
SECTION 7: Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and
determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence,
both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings
and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City
Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in
the record as a whole.
9
SECTION 8: Limitations. The City Council's analysis and evaluation of the project is
based on the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a
project that absolute and perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the project will not
exist. One of the major limitations on analysis of the project is the City Council's
knowledge of future events. In all instances, best efforts have been made to form
accurate assumptions. Somewhat related to this are the limitations on the City's ability
to solve what are in effect regional, state, and national problems and issues. The City
must work within the political framework within which it exists and with the limitations
inherent in that framework.
SECTION 9: Summaries of Information. All summaries of information in the findings
which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The
absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a
particular finding, is not based in part on that fact.
SECTION 10: This Resolution will remain effective unless superseded by a
subsequent resolution.
SECTION 11: According the El Segundo Municipal Code, a copy of this Resolution
shall be mailed to any person requesting a copy.
10
SECTION 12: This Resolution is the City Council's final decision and will become
effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED thi§�_Nlh day of August, 2011.
Eric Busch, Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Resolution No. 4729 was duly passed, approved and adopted by said City Council at a
regular meeting held on the 16'h day of August, 2011, approved and signed by the
Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, by the following vote:
AYES: Busch, Fisher, Brann, Fuentes, Jacobson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAI : None
Cindy Morte�6n, City Clerk
WOM14 to W
VIN
ImArgual-AW i Ilk Mm
Karl H. PMer, Assistant City Attorney
11
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 4729
Exhibit A
FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
After receiving, reviewing, and considering all the information in the administrative record for
Environmental Assessment (EA) No. 836, including, without limitation, the factual information
and conclusions set forth in this Resolution and its attachment, the City Council finds,
determines, and declares for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project as
follows:
I. FINDINGS REQUIRED BY CEQA.
CEQA Guidelines § 15090 require the City to certify that:
1. The Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) has been completed in
compliance with CEQA;
2. The FEIR was presented to the decision - making body of the lead agency and
that that decision - making body reviewed and considered the information contained in the
final EIR before approving the project; and
3. The FEIR reflects the lead agency's independent judgment and analysis.
II. FINDINGS REGARDING THE POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE
PROJECT.
A. Impacts Found to be Insignificant in the Initial Study.
The Initial Study for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project, dated
July 2010, identified the following environmental effect as not potentially significant.
Accordingly, the City Council finds that the Initial Study, the FEIR, and the record of
proceedings for the project do not identify or contain substantial evidence identifying
significant environmental effects of the project with respect to the area listed below.
1. Agriculture and Forest Resources.
B. Impacts Identified as Less Than Significant in the Initial Study.
The Initial Study identified the following environmental effects as less than significant.
Accordingly, the City Council finds that the Initial Study, the FEIR, and the record of
proceedings for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project do not
identify or contain substantial evidence identifying significant environmental effects of the
project with respect to the areas listed below.
1. Air Quality (operational).
2. Mineral Resources.
3. Population and Housing.
4. Public Services.
5. Recreation.
6. Utilities and Service Systems.
C. Impacts Identified as Potentially Significant in the Initial Study But Which
Did Not Exceed Significance Thresholds in the DEIR.
The following environmental effects were identified as Potentially Significant in the Initial
Study. The City Council finds that the FEIR and the record of proceedings in this matter
do not identify or contain substantial evidence identifying significant environmental
effects of the Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project with respect to the areas listed
below:
Geology /Soils
a) Facts /Effects
(1) Seismic Event. Development of each of the five project
alternatives could expose people and structures to ground- shaking
and related effects during a seismic event. However, with
mandatory compliance with the California Building Code, impacts
would be less than significant for each of the five project
alternatives.
(2) Erosion. Development of each of the five project alternatives
could result in erosion or loss of topsoil. However, with mandatory
compliance with erosion protection measures under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Construction
Permit, impacts would be less than significant for each of the five
project alternatives.
(3) Geotechnical Hazards. Each of the three project sites could
be subject to geotechnical hazards including expansive soils,
hydro - consolidation, subsidence and settlement, and inadequate
existing fill. However, mandatory compliance with applicable
provisions of the California Building Code (CBC) would reduce
impacts to less than significant levels for each of the five project
alternatives.
b) Mitigation:
No mitigation measures are
level of significance for the
Alternatives Project FEIR.
c) Finding:
required to reduce impacts below a
El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility
The City Council finds that the FEIR and the record of proceedings
do not identify or contain substantial evidence identifying significant
0
environmental effects of the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility
Alternatives Project with respect to Geology.
2. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
a) Facts /Effects
Development of any of the five project alternatives would generate
Greenhouse Gas emissions from both mobile and operational
sources. However, development of any of the project alternatives
would not exceed recommended California Air Pollution Constrol
Officers Association (CAPCOA) thresholds and would not conflict
with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted
for the purpose of reducing the emissions of Greenhouse Gases.
Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, for all five project
alternatives.
b) Mitigation:
No mitigation measures are required to reduce impacts below a
level of significance for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility
Alternatives Project FEIR.
c) Finding:
The City Council finds that the FEIR and the record of proceedings
do not identify or contain substantial evidence identifying significant
environmental effects of the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility
Alternatives Project with respect to Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
3. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
a) Facts /Effects
(1) Demolition. All five project options would involve demolition or
renovation of existing structures, which, depending on their age,
could contain asbestos and /or lead based paint. If these materials
are not properly handled and disposed of, this could pose a risk to
the public or the environment through the release of hazardous
materials. However, mandatory compliance with State and federal
regulations regarding the handling and disposal of these materials
would result in less than significant impacts for all five development
options.
(2) Hazardous Materials. None of the three alternative project
sites are listed as hazardous materials sites, and the five proposed
project alternatives would not emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste.
Therefore, impacts to this issue are considered less than significant
for all five project alternatives.
(3) Airport Hazards. The Imperial Site and Urho Saari Site are
located within the Los Angeles International Airport Planning Area/
Airport Influence Area as identified by the Los Angeles County
3
4
Airport Land Use Plan. However, none of the five development
options is located within aircraft take -off and landing flight paths, or
within identified runway protection zones. Therefore, impacts to
this issue are considered less than significant for all five
development options.
b) Mitigation:
No mitigation measures are
level of significance for the
Alternatives Project FEIR.
c) Finding:
required to reduce impacts below a
El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility
The City Council finds that the FEIR and the record of proceedings
do not identify or contain substantial evidence identifying significant
environmental effects of the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility
Alternatives Project with respect to Hazards and Hazardous
Materials.
Hydrology and Water Quality
a) Facts /Effects
(1) Construction. During construction of each of the five project
alternatives, the soil surface would be subject to erosion and the
downstream watershed could be subject to temporary
sedimentation and discharges of various pollutants. However,
mandatory compliance with regulations and requirements that
pertain to construction activity would apply. Impacts would be less
than significant for each of the five project alternatives.
(2) Operation. Operation of each of the alternatives would alter
existing drainage patterns and increase the amount of impervious
surfaces on the site. This could potentially degrade the quality of
stormwater discharged from the project sites in the long term.
However, mandatory compliance with Los Angeles Regional Water
Quality Control Board NPDES requirements would reduce impacts
to a less than significant level.
(3) Drainage. Operation of each of the five project alternatives
would alter existing drainage patterns; however, this would not
result in on -site or off -site flooding. Impacts would be less than
significant.
b) Mitigation:
No mitigation measures are required to reduce impacts below a
level of significance for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility
Alternatives Project FEIR.
4
c) Finding:
The City Council finds that the FEIR and the record of proceedings
do not identify or contain substantial evidence identifying significant
environmental effects of the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility
Alternatives Project with respect to Hydrology and Water Quality.
D. Impacts Identified as Potentially Significant in the Initial Study But Which
Can Be Reduced to Less - Than - Significant Levels with Mitigation Measures.
The City Council finds that the following environmental effects were identified as Less
Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated in the Initial Study and FEIR, and
implementation of the identified mitigation measures would avoid or lessen the potential
environmental effects listed below to a level of significance.
Aesthetics.
a) Facts /Effects:
(1) Visual Character. Each of the five project alternatives involves
the construction of surface parking lot along a public road. This
could potentially degrade the existing visual character of any of the
three potential sites. Implementation of Mitigations Measures AES -
2(a-c), which require landscape screening of surface parking areas,
would reduce impacts to visual character to a less than significant
level. In addition, the Plunge is a designated local cultural resource
and renovation of the building could impact the scenic view of the
building. Compliance with CR -1(b) would reduce any impacts of
the Urho Saari option to a less than significant level.
(2) New Sources of Light or Glare. Each of the alternatives would
result in new sources of light and glare on and around the project
site. Glare generated by the proposed project alternatives would
not adversely affect neighboring uses, while light could adversely
affect nearby light- sensitive uses. Screening of new light sources
to avoid off -site light spillover is recommended. Implementation of
Mitigation Measure AES -3, which requires a photometric and
lighting plan, would reduce impacts to a less than significant level
for all five project alternatives.
b) Mitigations:
(1) AES -2(a) Hilltop Park Site Landscaping. A landscape plan
must be submitted to the City before issuance of grading or building
permits. The landscape plan must include landscaping at the
southern, eastern and western portions of the proposed surface
parking lot to screen the parking lot from public views from Grand
Avenue, Lomita Street, and Maryland Street. This plan must
consist of predominantly drought tolerant native and /or naturalized
species consistent with the applicable climate zone and the City's
Water Conservation in Landscaping regulations. All landscaping
must be monitored and maintained according to the original intent
of the landscape plan. The final landscape plan must be reviewed
5
and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety and
Director of Recreation and Parks before the City issues grading or
building permits.
(2) AES -2(b) Imperial Site Landscaping. A landscape plan must
be submitted to the City before the City issues grading or building
permits. The landscape plan must include landscaping at the
northern portion of the proposed surface parking lot to screen
parking lots from public views from East Imperial Avenue. This plan
must consist of predominantly drought tolerant native and /or
naturalized species consistent with the applicable climate zone and
the City's Water Conservation in Landscaping regulations. All
landscaping must be monitored and maintained according to the
original intent of the landscape plan. The final landscape plan must
be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building
Safety and Director of Recreation and Parks before the City issues
grading or building permits.
(3) AES -2(c) Urho Saari Site Landscaping. A landscape plan
must be submitted to the City before the City issues grading or
building permits. The landscape plan must include landscaping at
the southern portion of the proposed surface parking lots to screen
parking lots from public views from Mariposa Avenue. This plan
must consist of predominantly drought tolerant native and /or
naturalized species consistent with the applicable climate zone and
the City's Water Conservation in Landscaping regulations (El
Segundo Municipal Code Section 10 -2 -5). The height of landscape
planting must be controlled to maintain views of the Urho Saari
Swim Stadium. All landscaping must be monitored and maintained
according to the original intent of the landscape plan. The final
landscape plan must be reviewed and approved by the Director of
Planning and Building Safety and Director of Recreation and Parks
before the City issues grading or building permits.
(4) CRA(b) Urho Saari Site. Before the City issues building
permits, the Director of Planning and Building Safety must find,
based on review and recommendations by a qualified, City -
approved historic resources professional or preservation architect,
that the final architectural plans for the proposed new construction
conform to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation. This finding must be based on an inventory of the
building's character - defining features and final, detailed
construction drawings. The Secretary's Standards applicable to
related new construction and alterations to historic properties are
as follows:
Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation No. 3. Each
property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place,
and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical
development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from
other historic properties, will not be undertaken.
A
Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation No. 9. New
additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not
destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that
characterize the property. The new work must be differentiated
from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials,
features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the
integrity of the property and its environment.
Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation No. 10. New
additions and adjacent or related new construction will be
undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the
essential form and integrity of the historic property and its
environment would be unimpaired.
(5) AES -3 Photometric and Lighting Plan. Before the City
issues a building permit, a photometric and proposed lighting plan
for the project must be prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning
and Building Safety Director and Police Chief to ensure that light
and glare does not spillover onto adjoining residential properties.
Outdoor light fixtures included in the lighting plan must be low -
intensity, shielded and /or directed away from adjacent areas and
the night sky. All light fixtures must be installed and shielded in
such a manner that no light rays are emitted from the fixture at
angles above the horizontal plane. The final lighting plan must be
reviewed and approved by the Planning and Building Safety
Director and Police Chief before the City issues a building permit.
c) Finding:
The City Council finds that the project is conditioned to avoid or
substantially lessen the potential aesthetic environmental effects as
identified in the FEIR.
2. Air Quality
a) Facts /Effects:
(1) Construction Emissions. Construction of any of the five project
options would generate pollution emissions that would exceed
South Coast Air Quality Management District localized significance
thresholds for dust (small and fine particulate matter).
Implementation of dust control measures would reduce the impact
of this environmental effect to a less than significant level.
b) Mitigations:
(1) AQ -2 Fugitive Dust Control Measures. The following
must be implemented during construction to minimize fugitive dust
emissions:
a) Water trucks must be used during construction to keep all areas
of vehicle movements damp enough to prevent dust from leaving
the site. At a minimum, this requires three daily applications (once
7
in the morning, once at midday and once at the end of the
workday). Increased watering is required whenever wind speed
exceeds 15 mph. Grading must be suspended if wind gusts
exceed 25 mph.
b) Soil with 5% or greater silt content that is stockpiled for more
than two days must be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil
binders to prevent dust generation.
c) Trucks transporting material must be tarped from the point of
origin or must maintain at least two feet of freeboard.
d) Soil stabilizers must be applied to unpaved roads to prevent
excess amounts of dust.
e) All material excavated or graded must be treated with soil
binders or must be sufficiently watered at least three times daily with
complete coverage, preferably in the morning, midday and after
work is done for the day.
f) Ground cover must be replaced in disturbed areas as
quickly as possible.
g) All clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities must
cease during periods of high winds (i.e., greater than 20 mph
averaged over one hour) to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
h) The contractor must provide adequate loading /unloading areas
that limit track -out onto adjacent roadways through the utilization of
wheel washing, rumble plates, or another method achieving the
same intent.
i) All material transported off -site must be securely covered to
prevent excessive amounts of dust.
j) Face masks must be used by all employees involved in grading or
excavation operations during dry periods to reduce inhalation of dust
which may contain the fungus which causes San Joaquin Valley
Fever.
k) All residential units located within 500 feet of the construction site
must be sent a notice regarding the construction schedule of the
proposed project. A sign, legible at a distance of 50 feet must also
be posted in a prominent and visible location at the construction site,
and must be maintained throughout the construction process. All
notices and the signs must indicate the dates and duration of
construction activities, as well as provide a telephone number where
residents can inquire about the construction process and register
complaints.
1) Visible dust beyond the property line emanating from the project
must be prevented to the maximum extent feasible.
D
3
m) These control techniques
specifications. Compliance with
site inspections by the City.
c) Finding:
must be indicated in project
the measure is subject to periodic
The City Council finds that the project is conditioned to avoid or
substantially lessen the potential air quality environmental effects as
identified in the FEIR.
Biological Resources.
a) Facts /Effects:
(1) Bird Habitat. All three potential sites contain non - native, mature
landscape trees, which may be removed as a result of the project.
No protected species were observed on -site. The mature trees
could provide nesting habitat for raptors and /or migratory bird
species. Restricted times on tree pruning and /or removal or pre -
construction nesting surveys and monitoring will mitigate any
environmental effects to a less than significant level.
b) Mitigation:
(1) BIO -1 Migratory Bird Species Act Compliance. To avoid the
accidental take of any migratory bird species or raptors, the removal
or pruning of trees must be conducted between September 15 and
February 15, outside of the typical breeding season, as feasible. If
avoiding the nesting season is infeasible, a qualified
biologist/ornithologist satisfactory to the City's Environmental Analyst
must conduct focused nesting surveys weekly for 30 days before
grading or initial construction activity. The results of the nest survey
must be submitted to the City in writing within one week after
completion for review. No grading or other construction activity can
occur before the City reviews the survey report. The last survey
cannot be conducted less than three days before any proposed
clearance of vegetation or other construction activity. In the event
that a nesting migratory bird species or raptor is observed in
habitat/trees to be removed or within 250 feet of the construction
work areas, the applicant must delay all construction work in the
suitable habitat area or within 250 feet of the nesting activity until
after September 15, or continue focused surveys in order to
determine when nesting activity has ceased. If an active nest is
found, clearing and construction within 50 -250 feet of the nest,
depending on the species involved (50 feet for common urban -
adapted native birds and up to 250 feet for raptors), must be
postponed until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged, and
there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Limits of
construction to avoid a nest site must be established in the field with
flagging and stakes or construction fencing. Construction personnel
must be instructed regarding the ecological sensitivity of the fenced
area.
E
Once the pre- construction bird surveys are conducted by a qualified
biologist during the proper seasons, the report results, including
survey dates, exact species observed and location of species onsite,
must be submitted to the City for review and approval. No
construction may begin before this approval.
c) Finding:
The City Council finds that the project is conditioned to avoid or
substantially lessen the potential biological resource environmental
effects as identified in the Initial Study.
4. Cultural Resources.
a) Facts /Effects.
Modification to Urho Saari Swim Stadium. The project at the Urho
Saari Site involves alterations to a structure designated as a historic
resource. Mitigation Measure CR -1(b) would reduce the
environmental impacts of the project to a less than significant level.
b) Mitigation:
CR-1(b) Urho Saari Site. Before the City issues building permits,
the Director of Planning and Building Safety must find, based on
review and recommendations by a qualified, City- approved historic
resources professional or preservation architect, that the final
architectural plans for the proposed new construction conform to the
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. This finding
must be based on an inventory of the building's character - defining
features and final, detailed construction drawings. The Secretary's
Standards applicable to related new construction and alterations to
historic properties are as follows:
Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation No 3. Each
property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place,
and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical
development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from
other historic properties, will not be undertaken.
Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation No 9. New
additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not
destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that
characterize the property. The new work must be differentiated from
the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features,
size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the
property and its environment.
Secretary of the Interior
additions and adjacent
undertaken in such a rr
10
Standards for Rehabilitation No 10. New
or related new construction will be
anner that, if removed in the future, the
5
I.
essential form and integrity of the historic property and its
environment would be unimpaired.
c) Finding:
The City Council finds that the project is conditioned to avoid or
substantially lessen the potential cultural resource environmental
effects at the Urho Saari site as identified in the FEIR. The
environmental effects of the project at the Imperial site are less than
significant without mitigation as identified in the FEIR.
Land Use /Planning
a) Facts /Effects:
The proposed project would be generally compatible with existing
adjacent land uses in the vicinity of each of the three project sites,
with incorporation of mitigation measures included in the
transportation, air quality, aesthetics and noise sections of the final
EIR. Incorporation of the mitigation measures of the identified
sections would reduce the environmental impacts below the
threshold of significance.
b) Mitigation:
The mitigation measures identified in Sections 4.1 (Aesthetics), 4.2
(Air Quality), 4.9 (Noise), and 4.10 (Transportation and Circulation)
would reduce impacts that could lead to land use conflicts to levels
that would avoid significant land use compatibility impacts.
c) Finding:
The City Council finds that project is conditioned to avoid or
substantially lessen the potential land use environmental effects as
identified in the FEIR.
Noise.
a) Facts /Effects.
Operational Noise. Operation of any of the project alternatives would
generate noise levels that may periodically be audible to existing uses
near the project site. Such noise sources include stationary
equipment such as rooftop ventilation and heating systems, trash
hauling, surface parking, and general activities associated with
recreational uses. Impacts would be mitigated to below a level of
significance with the incorporation of mitigation measures N -3(a) and
(b).
b) Mitigation:
(1) N -3(a) Rooftop Ventilation. Parapets must be installed
around all rooftop ventilation systems to shield noise from nearby
sensitive receptors.
11
(2) N -3(b) Trash Pick -Up. All trash pickups must be
restricted to daytime operating hours (7:00 AM to 10:00 PM Monday
through Friday, and 8:00 AM to 10:00 PM on weekends).
c) Finding:
The City Council finds that project is conditioned to avoid or
substantially lessen the potential operational noise environmental
effects as identified in the FEIR.
7. Transportation and Circulation
a) Facts /Effects:
Construction Traffic. Traffic associated with construction activities
for any of the project alternatives would result in potentially
significant traffic impacts as a result of haul truck traffic volumes,
construction - worker parking, and cumulative construction traffic.
Impacts would be mitigated to below a level of significance with
the incorporation of mitigation measures T -2(a) and T -2(b).
b) Mitigation:
(1) T -2(a) Construction Traffic Management Plan. A
Construction Traffic Management Plan must be prepared before
the City issues demolition, grading or building permits. The plan
must, at a minimum, address the following items:
a) Maintain existing access for land uses in proximity to the
project site during project construction.
b) Schedule deliveries and pick -ups of construction materials to
non -peak travel periods, to the maximum extent feasible.
c) Coordinate deliveries and pick -ups to reduce the potential of
trucks waiting to load or unload for protracted periods of time.
d) Minimize obstruction of through- traffic lanes.
e) Control construction equipment traffic from the contractors
though flagman and traffic control devices.
f) Identify designated transport routes for heavy trucks (in addition
to haul trucks) to be used over the duration of the proposed
project.
g) Schedule vehicle movements to ensure that there are no
vehicles waiting off -site and impeding public traffic flow on the
surrounding streets.
h) Establish requirements for loading /unloading and storage of
materials on the project site, where parking spaces would be
encumbered, length of time traffic travel lanes can be
12
encumbered, sidewalk closings or pedestrian diversions to ensure
the safety of the pedestrian and access to local businesses.
i) Coordinate with adjacent businesses, residents, institutions, and
emergency service providers to ensure adequate access exists to
the project site and neighboring commercial, institutional, and
residential uses.
(2) T -2(b) Worker Parking Management Plan. A Worker
Parking Management Plan must be completed before the City
issues demolition, grading or building permits. To the maximum
extent feasible, all parking for workers must be accommodated on
the project site. During any demolition and construction activities
when construction worker parking cannot be accommodated on
the project site, the Plan must identify alternate parking locations
for construction workers and method of transportation to and from
the project site for approval by the City 30 days before
commencement of construction. The Construction Workers
Parking Plan must include appropriate measures to ensure that
the parking location requirements for construction workers will be
strictly enforced. These include, without limitation, the following:
a) Provide all construction contractors with written information on
where their workers and their subcontractors are permitted to park
and provide clear consequences to violators for failure to follow
these regulations. This information will clearly state that no
parking is permitted on any residential street.
b) Prohibit construction worker parking within 500 feet of the
nearest point of the project site except within designated areas.
The contractor is responsible for informing subcontractors and
construction workers of this requirement.
c) Identify sites where construction workers could park off -site, if
necessary.
In lieu of the above, demolition and construction activities may be
phased such that all construction worker parking can be
accommodated on the project site throughout the entire duration
of demolition and construction activities.
c) Finding:
The City Council finds that project has been conditioned to avoid
or substantially lessen the potential construction traffic
environmental effects as identified in the FEIR.
E. Sianificant Unavoidable Effects that Cannot be Mitigated to a Level of
Insignificance.
The City Council finds that the following environmental effects were identified as
Significant and Unavoidable in the FEIR. Implementation of the identified mitigation
13
measures would lessen the potential environmental effects to the extent feasible but not
below a level of significance.
1. Cultural Resources.
a) Facts /Effects.
Either Hilltop Site option would involve demolition of a potentially
historic reservoir structure. Cultural resource impacts would be
significant and unavoidable under the Hilltop Site alternatives.
Mitigation Measure CR -1(a) would reduce the cultural resource impact
of the two Hilltop Site options, however the mitigation would not
reduce the impact below the threshold of significance.
b) Mitigation:
CR -1(a) Hilltop Park Site. A historic preservation professional
qualified in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards
must be selected by the City of El Segundo to complete a
documentation report on the City Reservoir structure. The structure to
be demolished must be documented with archival quality photographs
and sketch location plans, and /or existing as -built plans, if available.
This documentation, along with historical background prepared for this
property, must be submitted to an appropriate public repository
approved by the City. The documentation reports must be completed
and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety before
the City issues demolition permits.
c) Finding:
The City Council finds that the project is conditioned to lessen the
cultural resource environmental effects at the Hilltop Park Site as
identified in the FEIR. The environmental impacts of the project at the
Hilltop Park Site cannot be mitigated below the threshold of
significance.
2. Noise.
a) Facts /Effects.
Construction Noise. Construction of any of the five options at the
three alternative sites would result in the generation of noise that
would exceed thresholds of significance at nearby residences and
schools. Mitigation Measures N -1(a) through N -1(d) will reduce
construction noise impacts, however these impacts cannot be feasibly
mitigated below a threshold of significance. Construction noise
impacts would be unavoidably significant for all five development
options.
b) Mitigations:
(1) N -1(a) Staging Area. Contractor must provide staging areas on
site to minimize off -site transportation of heavy construction
equipment. These areas must be located to maximize the distance
14
between activity and sensitive receptors. This would reduce noise
levels associated with most types of idling construction equipment.
(2) N -1(b) Diesel Equipment Mufflers. All diesel equipment must be
operated with closed engine doors and must be equipped with factory-
recommended mufflers.
(3) N -1(c) Electrically- Powered Tools and Facilities. Electrical
power must be used to run air compressors and similar power tools
and to power any temporary structures, such as construction trailers
or caretaker facilities.
(4) N -1(d) Additional Noise Attenuation Techniques. For all
noise - generating construction activity on the project site, additional
noise attenuation techniques must be employed by the construction
contractor to reduce noise levels. Such techniques must include, but
are not limited to, the use of sound blankets on noise generating
equipment and the construction of temporary sound barriers between
construction sites and nearby sensitive receptors.
c) Finding:
The City Council finds that the project is conditioned to lessen the
construction noise environmental effects at all three project sites as
identified in the FEIR. The construction noise environmental impacts
of the five project options cannot be mitigated below the threshold of
significance.
F. Insianificant Cumulative Impacts.
The City Council finds that the Initial Study and FEIR and the record of proceedings in
this matter do not identify or contain substantial evidence which identifies significant
adverse cumulative environmental effects associated with the El Segundo Aquatics Site
Feasibility Alternatives Project with respect to the areas listed below:
Aesthetics
2. Agricultural and Forest Resources
3. Air Quality
4. Biological Resources
5. Cultural Resources
6. Geology and Soils
7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
9. Hydrology and Water Quality
10. Land Use and Planning
15
11. Mineral Resources
12. Noise
13. Population and Housing
14. Public Services
15. Recreation
16. Transportation/Traffic
17. Utilities and Service Systems
There are no significant cumulative impacts.
G. Growth Inducing Impacts.
The City Council finds on the basis of the FEIR and the record of proceedings in this
matter that there are no growth inducing impacts.
H. Proiect Alternatives.
1. Reasonable Range of Alternatives.
a) Alternatives EIR.
The proposed project has five potential alternative designs and three potential
alternative project sites. The FEIR is an Alternatives EIR that analyzes the
proposed project alternatives at equal levels of detail. Thus the analysis
throughout the FEIR fulfills Public Resources Code (PRC) §15126.6 which
requires that the FEIR "describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project,
or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic
objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the
significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the
alternatives."
b) Findings.
The City Council finds that the FEIR and the record of proceedings in this matter
describe a reasonable range of alternatives that could feasibly attain most of the
basic objectives of the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Project. The City
Council also finds that the FEIR and record of proceedings in this matter contains
sufficient information about each alternative to allow for meaningful evaluation,
analysis and comparison of the alternatives.
2. No Project Alternative.
a) No Project.
The "No Project' alternative would involve no physical change to any of the
potential project sites. The existing site improvements to the Hilltop Park Site,
Imperial Site and Urho Saari Site would remain and no demolition or constriction
would occur. This alternative would involve no change to the average daily
16
vehicle trips to any of the sites. The "No Project" alternative would avoid
significant and unavoidable impacts associated with construction noise at the
Hilltop Park Site, Imperial Site, and Urho Saari Site. The "No Project' alternative
would avoid a significant and unavoidable cultural resources impact at the Hilltop
Park Site. The "No Project' Alternative would also avoid potentially significant,
but mitigable impacts related to aesthetics, air quality, cultural resources, land
use, noise and traffic. The "No Project' alternative would be environmentally
inferior to the five project alternatives with respect to water quality and hydrology
as development of the project would improve water quality at each of the three
sites as discussed in the FEIR. In addition, the "No Project' alternative would be
environmentally inferior to the Urho Saari Site option in respect to aesthetics as
that project option would improve the aesthetic quality of that site.
b) Finding.
The City Council finds that the "No Project' Alternative would not achieve the
basic project objectives as stated in FEIR Section 2.0, Project Description.
These objectives are to "Analyze the feasibility of alternative locations and design
options for development of increased aquatic recreational opportunities with the
City of El Segundo" and "Identify the most feasible alternative for the
development of a modern public recreational aquatics facility."
3. Environmentally Superior Alternative.
In compliance with PRC §15126.6(d), a matrix displaying the major
characteristics and significant environmental effects of each alternative is
included in FEIR Section 6.0, Alternatives. The purpose of this matrix is to
summarize a comparison of project alternatives. Pursuant to PRC §15126.6, it is
required that one alternative be identified as the environmentally superior
alternative. Furthermore, if the environmentally superior alternative is the "No
Project' alternative, the FEIR must also identify the environmentally superior
alternative from among the other alternatives. FEIR Table 6 -2 is the matrix
comparing alternatives. In this table the "No Project' alternative is identified as
the environmentally superior alternative. The Hilltop Site Option one (competition
pool only) is identified as the most environmentally superior project alternative.
III. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
The City Council finds on the basis of the FEIR and the record of proceedings in this matter that
the unavoidable significant impacts of the Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project as
discussed in Section II.D. above are acceptable when balanced against the benefits of the
Project. This determination is based on the following substantial public and social factors as
identified in the FEIR and the record of proceedings in the matter. Each benefit set forth below
constitutes an overriding consideration warranting approval of the project.
The need for an additional aquatics facility in the City was identified in an Aquatic Facility
Needs Analysis contained in the City of El Segundo Aquatics Master Plan (August
2005). This document identified the aquatic recreation facility and program needs based
upon community and stakeholder input as well as a demand and needs analysis. A
copy of the Aquatics Master Plan is available in the Planning and Building Safety
Department and is incorporated into this Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC)
by reference as if fully set forth.
17
• A new aquatics facility in the City would provide a substantial social benefit to the City.
As identified in the Aquatics Master Plan there is a substantial deficit in aquatics facilities
in the City for competition and exercise /class uses and a deficit in aquatics facilities for
recreational uses.
• The long term recreational benefits of a public aquatics facility to the community and
aquatics facility users in the City, as set forth and explained in the Aquatics Master Plan,
outweigh the short-term construction noise impacts of the Project.
The improvement to the recreational amenities
term recreational benefits of a new aquatics
unmaintained, unused and inaccessible surfac e
designation as a local cultural resource.
IV. SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.
available at Hilltop Park and the long
facility outweigh the preservation of a
reservoir that is potentially eligible for
The City Council finds and declares that substantial evidence for each and every finding made
herein is contained in the FEIR, which is incorporated herein by this reference, and in the record
of proceedings in the matter.
V. CERTIFICATION OF EIR
The City Council hereby certifies that the Final Environmental Impact Report SCH
#2010071005, dated August 2011, for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives
Project has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and
Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et sue.
PAPlanning & Building Safety \0 Planning - Old \PROJECTS (Planning) \826 - 850 \EA 836 \City Council 8.16.2011 \EA -836 Exhbit A
CEQA Findings of Fact.doc
18
El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project EIR
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 4729
EXHIBIT "B"
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the El Segundo
Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project, proposed in the City of El Segundo, California.
Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a) requires that a Lead Agency adopt an MMRP
before approving a project in order to mitigate or avoid significant impacts that have been
identified in an Environmental Impact Report. The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure that the
required mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report are implemented as
part of the overall project implementation. In addition to ensuring implementation of mitigation
measures, the MMRP provides feedback to agency staff and decision - makers during project
implementation, and identifies the need for enforcement action before irreversible
environmental damage occurs.
The following table summarizes the mitigation measures for each issue area identified in the
Environmental Impact Report for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project.
The table identifies each mitigation measure; the action required for the measure to be
implemented; the time at which the monitoring is to occur; the monitoring frequency; and the
agency or party responsible for ensuring that the monitoring is performed. In addition, the table
includes columns for compliance verification. Where an impact was identified to be less than
significant, no mitigation measures were required. However, for Transportation and Circulation
two recommended mitigation measures are included for impacts that are less than significant.
City of El Segundo
m
W
U
a)
0
a
N
E
Q
r
N
m
U
U-
7
Q
Q
O
c
U
U)
W
O
G
d
N
W
v.
O
Lq
C
O
fy
v
2
c
O
U
m
d
m
c
Aa
�
E
V
c
w
-0 (D
coo
� c
0 m
c f)
TJ O N
w� Qf N'
O m V% N O O N
W C CD
m
��d
o =t c�� ma
o c cad ma-
�a
�rn� _� ��
U•-- = c a) c
BTU _-0 2 U�
U` -' c•- U c
Uv>pam mm m
0U)0dm moOf m
C C
U
0 c 7 c
0 U
- 0- c 7 c
p
° N
W cu
°° ° y
,�0+ 3
C Q
U° a
L c C) y- O
a
H C« v
LL
U
U
U
E
�f0 O O
O
N
C
Orn.
c U `
U y
0 ww.0 0
0 0
�+
_N
N
C
m �
C 3
U 2 O T
ao c
U O" U U O T
° ao c
O V
D c
m
U
fT m
�'�
E 0
0
2? 0 r C a'-.
o CT= ° uU
c a-
° ° ° v
m O L m .y
(m -0 m .N O a
m fU O m C N L O U
(D -r- rnO ° -p m 15 c E«.
N
m U m U U N U U
m« � C
•L.� C y J m« 7 C m N C a
O •C « O O C Y •� N Q
Q
ai
a spa�p
a C U 3 cc C y `) .- C°7 C
L" m C
Q C Z cO cm C .N L 7 C U C
W m
cr
m m U) m •U j 'N U O .O
'D a c a V c m c L f9 a
m m C m m fT
0 •O
a :: C) 0-6 U j (D
C
O
.6 �O
m co «'_ > c o° OIz C
MD V .0 U
c m,aaQO y °)� c
m C U
L 'C
am c °av m a o> E>
3 `�•� �s d U
a
>vr ° 2 E m ai (D >'u m� E�aa
U c v &U O U
» �i�r t �� c C' c75 a
U c c 075
c`) o- c a
_ .S N fn f!) c N.L. m E L.L .� m
o 0° c o ac
E c N m U m m E E.9
O
N
c w O L L_ N c N 0) 3
Q j O E 4?
a
CL
w
aO E c 3 o m• - N
V O fcC U �` m C U > C w
�U ��'� c�� �� oU
�� E o ° m y ='a o
.- G O C p- O N in U c U U Of
CL E °
c!c!pEvmnwoo°ce
� _ CM CL u�miw
°cN -0 (pa(pOaya 00«
�'D (m o aa) M'a
0 nLa) cta�a� 0
O
J L m 7 •� N C c c U E U a N 0 U
'0 m C •U m fT'V C J E U
w -0� 0 0 3-D C 0 0 C C C'pN m N E V O N
Cc
J N U d a N N U C�--o
O
fi L 7 m "' O > U O U N J m c_ C C E
4) 7 cu y E > y E •0 C
U
7 .CD U m a• .V N N L a« •C N m n m N W
a E L E aL O j N m C C y Y a
3 E° '(q m
cn N a) m N 0 y C ,N -= m N m
N L f7I� " O y •c
7 N c
O
fA
C U E ,O fT
.L-.
c U U a to C� �j m T w a- C
-D m- E
m' C U N m
'C E U •a N O a) E � c �6
E
m
0
0 N U 0 U L m -0 �
aO+ f6 N m U M E _m f0
0. Q
m '0
C N m Q° C m O-
tm
C
•a U Q
U
= U "•' E ,04 . O E N C L N m e U m 3
E a E m y O cc9
c
a a ff) fCf) v O J L C m ,U C° c-0 C 0 O� O p
U a CCc M Q)—'a
fah C
°
_
=°-� my E pj°�~ E E aU•2 o m c a� io
L y w m m
m U�•° o
�y �c_E
L
`+ N
(n
W
.0 C
(%i C 7 DO--- C -0 O U
W- •� V M > •- N c U m f7) O •r L C C U m
•r-
U 7 w N N�
«T. CM O
W e ' •7 U U p •@
Q
aQU..S U a°-QV) am�2 2 E `o H m mw 8)
.L-'
w
m.S O NW s, c 3U d E
O
G
d
N
W
v.
O
Lq
9
O
d
N E
C 0
c, a
Q �
C
O
CL
M m
LL v
y C
Uy O)
U C
M +O+
7 •c
Q o
O�
C O
CM A
(n
0
c
W
0
V
�
c
o
m
Ev
O
U
d
m
y
c
co
•a
�
p
E
v
M
S
cu
C
C
0 0 U N O 0
w ` Of - `M .�
° pU ) 0
'o
ac
a)
(A IM
E
w 0. m O 0
C
°
wO
� c �
M o
° U C a
C
N L6 C
f 7 L
CL co m0X m
Utnpam mU
J N U
w
C
•�0 7
E
'� C f0 O y t9
a
v7i c c.�
w° a N c0
�° cna
C c 7
�LL
o
�OCE
_
u'=
O a) w&
O (ML
-H€
c N M c N— N
L O
O .y L Mm o a
0
N
(M
7
O C O
C c
7 C
a) C
O V
Q) a) 0 T
(0 a U
a) O a) C
C-0
N N
y C
C
C C cm C C a
f0 f0 E
a) 'j
E
w L' U 'y
U
m .S2 aL M .N O C_
m O a O a
M 4) f9 `� 'n C w V a)
C.0 «
aN
p No -p �` C
_ C)
0
N w aC a0 O
> f9 •C .N., 7 0 N a C y
O
a)
a7 N
O U,0 C N
O a.0 @ � N
3
O L a-- O E C .O M E LL
a 3 O m m� > c € a
r a C >. �_ 'fD p
aD c
3 w
C
M
a
cca
; C CC0'
ay
M M- 3 O n a
C N u) D a
(a0 M rn.
C o L
C
y C f_CO c`a «0 o
f0 G N L a •C C N C O C E C („) U
3a) ��coNov
C 'C fC0 m
ID N a >� N •�
°aNi`o
L)
Q
O
°E>
O-0 O j v°i c0 C cu ? 'N j E U c Z N 2
3Ern=
0 O a O O
a
a
C
a>i cf a) 5 o m a) 0Z 4)) E 0.
���
.0
o
a>it Q,o c a�
M
��.CZ N a$ C U E o >. ca
a_ C O ao
>
O
a
N
O
3 C N
O N C
Of r 7 C E N .L, N a) Q C N a U
mac
C O` C
coy
arc T)
a0 00-C >3 �� m
a f°C
°
a 0 U
y a O y C y L .� �p .0 C C p ,N
C E L C O O
c
a nw m
° ° °�
c OL .- > 7 c aaN m�a c0. yd
a at �_� E � c C Ecnv•c' ° o -C
.-' c
rna'E o f6 a >
w
f0 7 O
lcQ� c�.L)
J N 2 to N L c 4) C M E° 0 E_ 2° j Q y N
J Of L _O
O U
C
N E U �O N
C a)'
) a) N Q) f°a Q a o N C (Cp C C 3 'C r E U �O
L a) c a) o (n a)
N a
C m p N
O
U
C 07 J C L €
f0
U f0 y E N L 'U N J O a) 0 .c O° C y
N C L f0 E C a
•� f0 U O L j a)
M j N a ._
V L O 0 0
N 4)t Y
M
N N O
7. L a .� H O y C j L C M a) CI a a) 0 C'
l0 E C7
U U L
w w CU a O a �_ a C
N
7
.0 a +-• M
U T M a C
.T• C_ 7 w O F- a 4) c0 .-
N U N a N j >. a) •� M U) y L N o y T w a
L)
d O- N
E m am a) O
0
-0 U) c
C> O7
N
r a� € w u0) cac) m AML? E u c0 C�(n C.0
a) t0
w e
O t0 O w
O
W L
c °- °
a Y> S` L ca N j a) a ti c O cm O p
o ac_co o� m E 5.y o c° Ew•aa�i `-° o� o rn
E
a N5 ocna
M
p)
a�
�o c a7 c
C w f0 m`
`�
e�� m c a) ac o�° aUia o.�O �;� c a� m�
L a) a) a O N L.= m U
�� o E'o °)C
M
'� L C C O
C a) O y N a) M 2
W 7 U U O a C O >>� a N f0 N C c0 L C C a)
O a
W .0 O O •y •� L
O H f0 MIX
,�
Q Q U L .0 O N 2 O M.L. > U) a •> T E O H m m W O
Q 0_ a .L. N m .�
0
c
W
0
V
Q'
W
0
a
NE
a)a
Q �
c
4r
m d
U- C
o
f0 ++
= C
Q O
c
d �
12
0
c
W
O
o
aci
o
Em
w
'C
o
V
d
V
d
C
�a
•a
�
p
E
U
w
C
d
O
�
c
bom
OCR.
U) 0
w
wea•Sc
0 t5 c
c N
U(�pa_ m()
c �
•c
0 3
—>� O
_
U
Q
2
O L
c in
LL
° c o
d'a m U
O
C
Im
C
C C
41«
V
O)C
EO
O
rn0
C U
O C
m
f0
y m d O
y
y
j 0
O E C N>
�
O U
0 �p L N N
C4= y N �.. D
d
C
O
-
-0
y > O 'm
C�E 0-
3
.0
O �
�
c
O
m «
M 0 � .0 C 0
m
O � N C
m t
m
a m
U O .2 2 O N U U L = d
a
�
°C iN a
.°Lc
a v O E
'a m C N m L> m
o N
E .E
>
` N N
— N
N
c
•C
'a
j H C M N L
•N
m
CL
Qao
O C C6
O m `'a y 0 0)
C'
-0
y m
3 C)o
N O
m� H
° N n O_
v U N E
_
N
3 „°,
d
min�
'0
m.c
O C c M.0 is
>'c.0
i 2m
'r> > > o ° 0 C.0CN
� y� C
� E o
o
C
L Co m N
`� m N
O d O
0 o N— N C m y
0 c 3=
E 0 N
«
O
m N O
0 E 0 m C y�
« m
cc c
C
a L (D co Qi
E
y
in 0 O
n:
—
«,E
j� L m N
m mQ•a�
N N
N
`
N
a)
N
O
O C m 3 L m
CL m CL
E 00000 a
c CL
(A N
N L� N
C`
L
O
N U O m
E
-0 c
o C
0 y 0 -0 cm
N
-0
m N V
c °
E
C
N
E
y Q E a c
Y
° 0
E
s
a ;m
n
• C
O
L m
-
01
U L N E 3
a
.cO ..
cn co
C LN
3 Q Es
o
M.6 m
n
c a N
cO.
O • c« h N
C
O
CL
L Y
0
- E
i%•7
m
4) 'a Y L
N
N O) H
N
O` C
O
'
U O m N'D
N 2 E N O a C"o c
O d
Y
U "0 m
+
y
O � > �0
0
O
N O N
C
m C 'C
E .
C U
=
O Y ` O
U
..
d C
_
O2�
m'_C ° - ']
E-5 c
m
QH U
O�
E TES 3 c) N
>
N UZ
��° E
0
c
W
O
k
:
�
k§
c2
$a
<
ƒt
CL
\2
§g
q'
cr <°
o■
n&
E
2
k
�
&
�
G
a
\
E
%
J
>
A
=
c
a
/
d
c
I
o
CL
■�
cr
0LL
a
E.cu
$f0
2
2
cr
■
0
t5
>
.0 :@
0
5 &
aM
�
j
k �-0
be /2
2°
±
c
0
o£
CL
«
22
2�\k�
§k
E\�k
\ ;�m
k0
\ \\
0
ra)
°
7@
2/ !0
g2
' >_ =
22£ ®
2
g Em
f2
0
� E
m :3
$ƒ
Ew
2\�§f
CD
u
7k
'
g§
'm e -tk
=m
=� &F
2 -0 o
°°
k£
=co.gc
=e
2
c
m{
0- 0 2 m
o M
2
t° .o
M- = U)
» e c
E££ ;'
°
_ �: _®
2 m c»
;
o f
- >
kE
2 2 � > c
± t
- 'D
= m
3t
\����
2 2
= & 4 = 2
mcr�®
\ 0
_
e
a
\2Su
2&
c000
a 2
u
`
�
�`
\ ._ _ �
2 .g
2
E
�,� m
f2I2
Em
7 t 2
2 —
E®$
W o
@7
= g 0
§>! /c
\j
;
�R
��
°'±a{
t§
>c
�� =
§:§22
=-
@ "«
Eo77�
■
'N2
20
a�mE
'=
>�
o�
=0
e2o�E
-�acm
3�Q
��2��
om»[
�°¥
»0-
«.(��_
°m
pa
'_
0
3�
u«
��� =fM
-02
%00gym
k\ @cam
/00
W (D
`2Sf§>
(S
2�
�2.
-
>#
��¥�-=
fCD'
cm
2» m.�
u> U)
u�• -o=
cm Z
�a
ems.
c
£
J
dcf
0
�x±k(
a)
_E2
CDm �
■
kD:3M
0)
®�fd�k
k�§
LL 4)
_k»
©I
? =o
?_ (n_£/
�5
5m =Em
2£o5"0
�2m
q(DQ) >
2a
2
k
�
&
�
G
U
N
O
NE
c 0.
a, a
Q om
4t
d
f0
LL c
U) O)
C
f0 +O+
= C
Q O
O
C O
d �
(n .
0
c
W
v.
O
U
�
c
o
m
�a
E
•c
O
U
c
2
•a
m
p
E
O
A
c
O
auk
c
bow
O. d a
0 CI
- c 0.9 _ c
O O U C
Q:a
Ui)5dm()
C v
�
c
O
O
C > C�
2 LL
0 O O C N
.CcE aD
a
CL
0
cc�
t c
0-
rn
3 c 0
'c
O
0
2
2
O yy
.0 N CL
C
LL O .�
C m >,
0 0 0 C= N 7
N
3 •C 2L
Lu
3
•C
N N
N C L N O
O _ U f9
>
c O N N
�
y
c E
o
O C "'
O
O O C - C C ,
.1 -a) M � 9
C
O
O a) > N N �. N C
0 3 cl a�
Q
cm
-O 2 C N O o c U= N
O 2 O N 7 y
C C m O �' N N C U u
2Ucan) %Eascouata
N
A �•E y —_ o a
Y w 9 5
O
CL
t� H m¢LO'�� a�i
'� o u��i c LO. oC) m� o L
'~
y
N N
`• c L� .D N
o
C m - O U `O Z �
in
C
CL f0 N 7 >,
O C� E O •O C Lp y N N O C N U
M Lo O L N
Q N ,U � �' 3- U E := 3 N• 5 N
0 a) 0.ZN o.0 ac ` O `°'rn o E y y= -�
N U N E�Z,� -__� v E 2 >`c°'> rn
a
y f0 O N C L O O O.'U-' E 7 w N L
(n
W
a„i
N O U N d 0 0 O c •` •O 3
O
O N O E U E U N Q c c 'O C d O N
O.
Q:
N a a m Q m C N V N O V>
Q
U 7 O 'O 2 N w« ,c f0
L O_ E C
N 'p E C N C O C a U N N •0
G
O
'D N N O '� N Q a m C 2 N
�_ O-o O N N O � •� o N
O
M (C- to m
= d d N_ M CO •2) c N U O O L_ E Q) U L.. U
N
m> o'a N O .�:.9 j 0 _C C o.
!p
w> V y t0 > E L O !' N
N- c a
0 O Z C O Yj ul N 0 O O-C y a y
°~ o m
C
v v°�ito c p o c 3.c
CL
J
V
0 2 w yL c c o C
a C O U
O C C co N .O N U ,C U .y
O y U O m C fC N U ,C C O O C
O
_O) U p� N O .� y N w 0
C O O f0 N C O O w
E
A
O. U C 7 p) N N D f0 C N .O-. •� U
U« E N O U N 3 N a N fC0 ; L a 0
r-
fC
U m C C h LL m N M D) L
G_ C O` N to 0) y N E Y C
O. N O L O 5 N L O O > E 4' ~� O
'O
O
U
O O w E O O N O cu O U N L Lj O
C O O. U C N 3 U U - 0 CL .0 U O_
m
U
m U O U LL N N :..) ° L f- N 3 Of O
0
c
W
v.
O
U
_x
W
0
CL
N E
Lo
f0
O)
c O`
a; a
Q vo
CL
O
M
U- C
cm
y� C
U •C
M r
= C
CIO
0
c O
a) 0)
V% r
w2
0
e
W
0
U
o
y
�a
E
O
U
>
m
�
c
2
M
p
a
E
2
U
w
c
d `
o
cccM
_b
w
CL 0 C
o c
U Cn
C v
C C
«
N
O O
C c
O a)
L U
LL
C
C y
O .N
0
Of `
L C V
V
y O
30�
c
`D
o=
N N
m .N
c
O
pO
G
a�
CL
M O
Q
3 a)
E
>
O U
Q' 0
i0
C c y O
C y N O > L C O- N« c
CL
p 0 a) Y :� fU9 N O E N C N L C 0 LE U) c M
U
Q
•�
O -= a p O a m a) C U. C E _> w in M C C-0 c
O m 3 m c= m U m ,D M O= rn N oo a) _. a)
C
o c
m�
L U y 0 "y' L L
N
C
O
O 2 T N C M 0-0 f0
O U '� a) O a) .; N
O y U �p C O d w C _ C _a = C E ... O L .-. � O N L y 3 >.
cc
L a)
c
=
f0 .�. a)
C U a) a) a) ` v N M N C J N N 0 0 0= y
O E
Q M
c
O
U W (D— aCi c� Hw O o m � c. —0 o o.m� = c E y( o� no
N> c N (D 7 a) O Ld a) - 0-0 = O
M N O Q.c
N
W
m m or
�1
Mo _ p
.L.. O � r a) rn- L c N N V w N O
C r. w E O U C O ? f0 N C-0 �_ O C CM _- O N c� _
U
N c
.N
7
N
_•
= c6 C •� L« «� f0 Y O fD _> f9 E-0 m O V O O N L U y N m
`" w �' •- U Ln E' L N N .0 M> N =` O C Q .'. M N Ci C>
o C
�
fn
M N
d�
41
_
N N U O L O N a) >+ v w O f0 a) a) " O vi x •U O O O
fC N M W f0 i N a 3 a d �_ C-D ` U r a 0 &n 0_ (D O m c d L U a
W
Q O
0`
C
c CL
N U C _O c ,� M C t a) Z .> C In N a- >- N C C O C« f0 N L y N y CL
O. .- O O CC
C Z
CL
�_ C
o
L O O •� y U= N a) m a rn .0 N U •� N a f9 «: w y
H-�? U E ��n� u 3 o m oo �� � m co UL u �� a> a) m co O�
O
C 0f0 C .N
� N C
_� •'
y C N
O ia OO'D a N �t
J
V a) y •2 0.
CL C C L C E O
O 00 a.0 w c L a O
o° O
~
J
y N
� °
co_
o=�=c � mcm � c�U� � c
U
V n
0
e
W
0
U
L:
n
O
d
N
m
c
Q
L
N
m
U-
N
U
3
O'
Q
0
C
3
O)
a)
W
M
O
CL`
ci
C
M
rn
c
0
O
2
�a
c
y
W
0
V
C
c
o
m
v
E
E
w
•c
o
U
c
A!
•a
M
p
E
A
U
c
d `
`_M
o f6
m
cm
g�a
CL
oc
����
oc °'cE�
dQ
�'5 m
�rn2 ��w
�amcn
UU) Cl.M n
c
0 m
O C a O
3
c Q
= N
o•
y c9 .` V
H cy Q,2
LL
E
O O
U 'N 'o a C N
C O '- 'C C
a
O.L. L M -0 0
0
N
O) `
a1 C V
t V
c
O
0 0 0 0) 0
N a c
.0+
3 -0
r-
o
E E
O �.0 0
a
4)a`)
O-
u3i=�c
m .N L f6 U
c6 • c ,� 0
>. o w`
N E f0 tq a)
.-. a .L. C N U N
fA c
L
C .L-• O �cp M M
O-o
N c9 �cOpp V
N
O N '� 3 .0 "Co a U N -
N V U W= rte'• f`0 C fC ; fN O 'D W
c -- C M N E L al c !6 C N
N � c N f0 N C.0 a) «. O a
C fD N C N N
c a (n u �, cco p O �p E= 0 i[ c0 O -0 -0 .y L N
0
O
a L •� = a M N> L «6 2
C Q a c0 f9 �`
?- 2 a) (n « C f O N 3 0 a M M O a) •L
(n
i3
Q
a) f9 7 c6 4) C
7 N .0 E> p .� E O •N
U U
p f9 NN .O L M 'D c N
N -OV- J« t a) y- 2 >` N m •f° � C C V N •C
2 �6
'N
N 7 t O 7 E 0
U
- X 0 0
,O
O C f9 t� C .� 3 y C a O E
L
N 2 ��pp N C
O O L O E N t co C f9
.L.+ N Q CL= .. a 0 CL) f>9 N (0 N
.L. C O 0 V
m� �_Q > v VZ (D L) ' E N E cc C-) E
C
a�
f• O 7 7 0 a)
E E
>` L V N Z' .0 Z' O a) aj voi
a
Q(D
aZis �o ui�,( 41�
4o °•c
U N �� a @�o _ o,o N E �« a�
° aa`V,o c '3 °- `o
-c°•- a��i -w o� o
M (D
Lam. -�0p
>,._~ 0)i C)i aci o
C
15 z to
j C N L O a O N
Z' N •�.• U U .O ' CO N
O N= C 'U L N C U 4) N Tt 0 O W CD
E M 30 p O U 0 3
N C w
O
V
a)
N _
y w
:°. 0 aa�� 3 �U. o
N L O O « a) a)
aC
a Q p .LO-.
y cO a N
_
m c� 0 0 0 �•- ca "a_ c 0 0 f0 O 0
a) E L N '�- U C O :° a) « E N d
p
U
«L. M O) a �€
V N 0 OC d .r L a O O O` aC, O 0) a
-0c
,� 0.0 O N
a) io M - -p N «` C fV6 f9 O CL
0 0
0_
cnE =3V�f6 a� a
a 2 N Li N U _ :O
Nwrn oZaOf°�NC�O- ow��>
R Q j U . s U N` M w ri L M a
M-0 0 o C
v cc0 L
N
M -0 U
a
M
+�'D 7 C al E M M O O O@-0 E
O
O '0 CL
N D1m a) >' 0 •O N 7 to N C a) Z O V 7 0
O V E c) U N O N N
c
O« c) _ 'c ca O 'o
Vcn��a o a`� E c m °)N
f� C N U L O t0 a O M 3 y L
�- m c 2 2 c -0� 3 0 0-0 c
O
c N W c N-D O X U 7 Z' O O_'C 7
a) 0 o o E O D c N
Q1 C 0 0 M to «� C' a7 +�.. O C .� O a)
C O w 'y m 0 C t0 c a � N@ 0 v L
a7
3L rn� c E
'� O 3 t5 O Y 7 N= 0 'N
Q to N N O V
VO
C.0
Q
� a) c y :3 0 w V a) '� a) U) _O C w O) aj O C� O
E
Z'
�j .0.. 2 = L C L f9 a) a a) a) a
c6 �Uv N E ac0f —LL �NL OU
C
N f6 Q O a) a) �.- L w C L N 4) V N O
U.NdL t9 aw C OH O M _ L 0 om O_N m.�`
�a
c
y
W
0
V
714
ir,
U
N
'o
a
tq E
fa �
�O
a
Q �
�'t
CL
m d
Q:
U- m
c
m
<n Of
t� C
fa +_O+
Q C
Q o
o�
c o
CM N m
w2
a
c
m
W
O
U
6b
C
o
d
a
E
4=
c
o
U
C
.a
0
E
U
�o
S
N `
O
c u '
w c m
b o
o�
C
a
yQ
c O.9 c
° �°
cai
�
w°
c_c
o
c 0
o
m 4)
m
c
0 12
Utnpa- mcn
UtnOa- mcn
U
o y
Oi
0 .p p
N t U
?^ p
�>p.
c U
J
2LL
c C
0,c N
c
O
c
°
00m c
CL -0mU
a
«
tm
c
m
c
rn •°
c U
cm
C_
L C v
O O
U
3�o
U U
N2o,2
p) y
mo
0
�O c •C
•C U
C
C
c
m U D U
O m
Q
N «
€ (D T �_
C f- > > O
fa
° m
a
o aN
co
N y�
0 m` aa) c
c E
o
c
O C
o MG N
O N
t L
E N c
o
c° N
a .0
0 o v, E -.o E$':
c�•� 3 0 3
Q
m 'C O
CL L-0 O a t m U N
p
C
j N N � E
>
o
�•� y y E m H
r m O N c C
c� c aE
N D1 7
C
L N
c
(n a O U m'a m
N N U
LL O CL C N N
N
LL
j
O
d c c N .N•
L m N -0 L ._
C
O c
— d
V
a
°
c 3 o N m'3 € r
° c
�.N °«�,N CD
E E
QL a
H
Q
O
o y o o o u, c° m
Uc C -
o 0 3 `° N L ` C U C y 0 .2
c� a
- •C to 04---0
w
O E° N y
L9
�N
°' y N 0
O
o y o 4 io� 2L aci o m
m
° U� c
E
i
o
-0 -0 9H N
mom; �,m � E a- m m c 0 0 Qa
5
c N M z 0 OL
« a� E
c
cn3f°2uai�'a�i)N�m �yccy.`�
UyNE 3. E
L
aCi�Ed
;
V
Z
C
ma c
a m N
a
LD
C O D m N aCi .r .N C C m N .N a)
.) 3 m N L
d O
N c )
m O m C m N
y
•3 O N E
i
7
y
C N° N r N w m L N
O U c N N `� E a ° :� 7„ L
Q N- N«
m VJ O
W O
u
m
d
NZ — 7 Nom, 7� NZ m rn w O
�cm3m'acia>iaioc0 wca�c�03
C N y •O
vrn.9CL a)0cc
C - U
HNN�
C
«
c o.o a= c 5 o E� m� o,o c c�c
N ca m y C O C O
M c •L°. 4) H�
N N
_d a•c
y
m° N'
U H f6 7 U y O T �� Y °' E
m c N
y .�. N N N) C
0 7
Q C O
W
U
`U N O. O
N
N
:►'� -j 'y .X N
•c _L •;
C N .c m Q)
c N N SC O m m 0_ m 0` N N C E C C
° cncr N L EE 3 3 E a.G coZ m°
O
,5 uNi
° m
2 ao E °cam
N y L
�' N O.
Z�
.U..
m N
2
CD U)
3
2
a
c
m
W
O
U
6b
_x
W
2
a
yE
f0 Qp
O
ua`
Q c
Z'
O
fy0 a1
LL c
r l0
�
WS
C
f0 �
7 C
Q O
O
c o
CM m
12
C
E
.0 O
y U
a°
W
v.
0
V
c
R
•a
p
E
O
U
m
S
m `
O
C
c
bom
c
bom
c
bwm
ui
iw
N w ui
iw�m�
O O
C !0
Erna
O Cf
5 c
w-0 - c cm
°
W ° Of
o �'c��
W °° 3
o °�
w O O` rn O p
o D t � �Uc °.2
(D
N.N m'3 N
�,2 m'7 f�C
�, cm C._ w
N @ 7 m
(
CD .0
c'O 7 U _
y ca 7
(n 0 d m fn
U (/) m cn
'`
Ucnoamcn
Q) .� 7
Uv)oa
,�_' •� j c •�
Ucnoam mcnoa
c v
cc
r
o
c
o
°
�c°i�
>
`°
c
w
Q
p> `
�ip��
U rn U
� j C
N O° •U
°
LL
Cf N
7 c
O c 5
C
_
N y? ._
C U
0 c f`6
'C 'c
_ _
() y rA
.O c c_ •« -a o) 2
U' E C
o
v m V
p 7 c °
d-0 m V
a)
N
O: n
O
p 7 a
av o
'C 'C
c () a) 2 '� (D 7 0
O�-0
rn� CL °
+°
O
0).2
o
y
c c
d o
2
C
m:
m o
a
€
o o
U
0
y
O y
m
c
°
m Q
«
c
0
0
c �
=
m
tm
2
0)w
c
C C
w €
N y
y
-5-5 C O N '7
m
D m
0
m .N o a
Q�
7 0
m .N -a 0) m � V
a)
C CL
C a) H
'V
a)
m
c
7 .N L N
7
.E U
C.- 2
2
•y 7
p _Q-vi
2 C a)
y
�_
a Co
3
«
V E 7 o E
C 'C 2
V U
O c t in
C
c .y N >, >
C
C o
N
C 7
cn > p _a
m m 0 a) c 7
�
m C
C D '
0'5 C
C Q a d N
i.i
� a� fC
��cppp
f0 L
•a
r
m~ d U E w U N
C C y O
O
`
N O a
L C o 'O
= cu N
a
E Y
,� m c
0.0 a) y p j C 0 .O
c 3 E 3 >
c
ai
4) ° y
C N a' U
ac cvi c
O
O O O C
U a U O. m
O O UZ: y
LL U m m
0 y0
- y
U C
a
«
m�
O O U � m
Q U m V m 0« U
>
'D
N C
o
to
U c
CL
O.
-
�3
O 4)
o4i y`
p 7 >
om y7 t a
o
Y rn a
.0 >,
S 0
Q
°
a
�
a= U) O • ) w
i
cp c
C
t a w
a m
o
° 0` .
c
c
M
E �
y
L a
0 m°
O c
« °
C
O
cm
=
m
a_ m
2 - �
O
p .
y 0 0
O C
c
3c a�Ei 2
H .o m a�M Y'D m m
•�
m LD
Q EaQ
o� c c -° uyi °>
(°�
a
0- c j .L. 'O f�D C
Z O c C 7 m
�' c N d
p
O D
ci
C U H O a O J y
O Q 7 U
7
U p m U
y y
'C y y
t C c
�� a� a> U-0 a) m
c-- 7 c E C
O p p
>-
Co y N
co
Y°
U
C-
p 0« m
E t m
V C E H O
y m
'C
N
«�
C
U m
m
c y C
w
0
y a p U '_
w°°
�+ V H o N 7 7 N .�
CL o E 0 a) �'
.0 C C
�°+ >
•y
C y h
Z
0
o
a 4 y jy U
C �
°
y CU
C
0 E
Q a) C� `o .0
ay'
` N¢ -0-0
~ ° N
m
0
O C 7
a `° C O
<.i
d •� a) d
_= U m O j m `
�
•C o
m•
Li
mC
.y
O E «°.�_
m
itlm
C m _7 m
•U 2 y V
C- .0 c`o .0 y E a
U C y C L "' C C p
.0 �q
`� y
y N
N
y
0 rn 0) 7 C E
C C U U .g f6 .X
LL o o H
.0+
ZH v coo E c°� w° rno v
Z E> c
Z Ers o
�i���' E a
a°
W
v.
0
V
_x
W
U
d
�O
CL
NE
d �
> V
fC �
C O`
0 I
Q Q)
U) d
Q:
U- C
:? m
U C
Co r
Q C
Q O
O
c O
U)
3
W
0
V
C
O
y
m
E
�=
c
O
U
c
_5
�a
m
p
E
O
U
m
C
d `
30
C 0
cm
�Q
c v
'C C
w 7
Q
O
iLL
O
O) `
d C XV
C"
O
i
c
a) o
M
�O-0 O m w U 0 c
iff a) 0 �p
•cr
M
O c'C m N N m
tCU
w
« O Ny C
m m O U c Oc c
E N cc
c
$f0 m my `° a
E
V
N- 0 •8 C h 6 N E O
O E >
M m O m$ C y as
�orn�U�maO.Em
t0
a
N
O
w > - 0 O Q*
V c
O'D
0 N N
d
� .-
N
O L 0
.L.. = y V=1 N
Q
N N a 0) .
f`O C
U 0
O r w
0) c O m G) N
3 Y
N U
w
Q Y y O .«+
y 7
m
cm
.a)
7`
OL
O O
O
c N .. O U
m 3
N C m
C Of Q Co C
o
U C v 3
aN o o
N
E m
j N
r mw
n cf
c: 3
•� U c
�) m m O c
v, 0 0 0
m
N .L-1
CL =
•7 L
0
E a
m N N N� C
L m N
C
� c 0 C U
c O E m` a
N:
0 0
C C O
u
> N
�O
W- c .E y> •m
c c 7 N
U
N N O O w D C
C«
0 O'
O V A
C O �[ � 4)
U m C O
CL
m.X m m
u
cc�
m 0.2 ui
>
m m nw E'mc
c c o m
0
(D 2
16 E 0
mo o•
t5
L
a�
`)
r
w"
y
°) E N " Q L
L 4; O` O
N m
C
0) •C
N
O C a
> y 0) N
U L d t N
2 10 3 y N
O
3 N N
0 D O C m 0 N
V U C
V O
j m.- C
H m a c M n 0 C
.0 0
!0
2 N` ui d 0
N O
2
N N a c
L C N N
O N
c ti c.0 U >>
0 E
ac) �� (D
0
U E o
H o•aU) 5 �.�y m
w
°off'u (n
O O N y m
V L U a �j �. O —
O f`0
O w «.
O O
(=,.r- L CL
L c O
«. m N
C C C O N U
L O O. N M U L..
U N O U
!� N m
3
W
0
V
x
w
U
N
•O
N
Q
N
m
m
LL
c�
Q
Q
O
v
c
N
wl
E
IM
0
a
c
G
y
W
0
V
C
C
O
y
«.
E
E
•c
O
U
c
m
•a
�
p
O
U
eo
:w
S
a�
C
c
bom
oaaci ea
H
we `o.�
O :3 c .-
o
�i c' d
Uc�Damcn
T
o
c
w° 0
m m
0 cc0 >' °
m O (0 U
C
O 9
2 L
N N O.C•C —c �2
V .- E�� � C N
C 'C c
0LE-D 07.0 aaD U
O
M
in
c �
C
rC
W L C
o
LLC
S V
SS
° n u
« O
c •p
C
O
N c C O�
o m .c N
N
N 2 7 0
M .L D
y CM N
N m
L
G
>
�i
° mcmQ,NEmE a
aaa c
Ir
d� 2v c
N M w w Q LL
a
C
i+
uai fL0 N
c N C
m 4. N L N« N d
Q
•O
O a m O y 0 U E 0
M L N
O M- N N w c a 0
> «N,
> N O f9 m N> .- N
O
N� w O
.L
m.C°
O.
m
d c N �G L. c' m C 7 c L O N .o., c d C�
E o •N m V N` O m Y m cm o L'
E aO o
N�� N - m
O N y m
3
c O Y
E
'~
°
o
c>E c: E� c m o ° CL- �~
rnU a —�•° c E w or aE� o o
5i c cmi O
�'� ° u; —�
Y 3
ag ° `o
°
'-'
m e a� c m o c 0 E- °aacoi o aac d)
C E N` C
C� aa�3
° �
arn�.o
N
U �O N 2=
N °v c °
d C
c
Y N N U
`O -v N
c
O
IM �� c T° E (D
c ao.0 m E >,3 -M a o f �,cia o m o
c m M o•°-
BL °v io 0
3 ami c o H
2
°�
-W
m �� me c c 0•=°
� o u y o o�
� a) 3 y°
E
�:� cL o ou Q)0 y
ad m e °� m E'> m ti -L.m N a� c E
in c c�.S c
_� y c
4)
E ui
U y
a� m� �� °.cn c CM
a°)H E c aNi
` Y O. 0 m Y E N
c'� o�.�L m m
U •> a
y o 0` m C
C
cm :3
E N C U L O
° o o > > y 0Y•m aC= �c m$ CT
3� 6 am °a
m €c ° ° y
c
N X O N
U °) u ° E
o
c.m
o
° E E. m o m N d 3.3 iri
Q o "u o Emu m m
m° N o o c f0
�.E.�'a ` O m•
0
Mo u, 9
M
L�
io
;)
'O m i 2- O C- o 0 « 0 j - 7
(D
> c 0 c O C L C
L LO p C Q
:z
LM.-
(c
N m 7 a O O p O C «� O c o N U O U N
c c N
L 0= c N
c
L M
Ha E o 3 a° 3 o m 3 mU °d E o 3.E E
m .O
m 3 m a> E N-
-
a3 al- ii
G
y
W
0
V
x
W
U
Q)
0
a
N
c
a)
Q
N
c0
a)
LL
N
U
Q
O
c
rn
a)
G
Im
O
CL
c
m
o)
c
0
0
i
c �
0 y
E
tC 0
di
c U
.o
W
v.
0
V
c
A
�a
�
O
E
1
U
w
C
W
°
y�
0cm
c
bow
w���cm
c
16 m
wo)a
w 0.9 _
Oj 5C.-
LU 0)
C
o 'c
dQ
ACM �. �
m�
rna) c =�
UcnoQ-
c)cn15 amcn
c v
'
°
C
2 L
cca)
cca`�
Q
Q -0 o
o
CL
v
O
o
c
0
3
a) CL
�o
°
�
atm
i
(D cm
c •r-
c . c c
r-
<
Q �
a)
M 0 y O a N c
a)
_
C
2 N O E
L)
_
c9 O - a� c U c C'a Vj
f60_�
f0 p t a� �
0 N�acif0a)
2L 0 C f6 y U b e f� O 'U
Cr
y � «�c��mE
n'C N m> a) L C N t
nc 3 nm o c o- o.
M nvi 3 _aw a) -w
C
0
—0O € a) ° y c O) N 01 a)
> 0) C Z' O 'y y C a)
`� O L 'O
> , 'U a) C
V
Q
_
c6 N C O U N a Y N .t..,
oc.5 E acL aE
_p C N i0
c0 p a) C p 0 -0 -0
E
E o 0
a> a .0 7 L
o c C�.c °•�4 a)
L y
a) m 0 .+�_' t0
Q W N cn U n N U N cn n D_
O
n> a 3 L m> .�•
Q W N N U FE E N n Q Cn
O
N CD c
a) j.0 °
c0 •� N O 7
U
N
C
G
Y =
p -0 Co •O
y 7 _ N N
C— a) a s Or- E N N.L. E C
u)
y
c« a) j
�r
a) U E
C
m CL y L U ,� C 3 C_>
" M `p C U O O 0
d O
CO
c f9 �_
m 0. � 'm p
p N p U
N lC y 0 .- m c d h '� a
N.- n` E
C •V C y cti
U
0
:3 ccc 0 a) a U C
CL ° 'O c c N ..V N
N o E .� E
r�M
t0 - c Q'
C y 'p O
'E Q L M C> U m j N CL
O O C pnj «O c
0
0 E EY n� y
o� a�U one olU U no Qa)
° c m a)
o� > c� m
>
`mom a) c a)
0)
c m aU) m�L°.w
•°)► -�� > c
r- M 3.°� 0 =t5 ° 0 C
•rnH
CL 0
°'aE -j rn- mU) m (D CLo °
m ao¢ o
�+
S
) ti m m 2 0 O °-
o
CLE y N m-0 O'm c me
`��°
y CL -0.0
'a
N
a) c o1 �
O O
v E `°�L rncco� m
C r E U O O O U
a) U U N rn `0 '� R N
E m��c m °'
C W ca
° p CD a)
O
z y
���pUE°)c°�
C a) O c9 �
E,�O�= ayiv°iEomo°)�� rn
C Z C p
Ecf°idoa)�
ac )10
•C
a) N
O 0 s V L c
U U 0 M M
4U) y >> m N a c t _y
X N J W (D (D E.5 m m Q 0 n m
a) a)= V L .N `)
X cA cn Q' N> C cn
.o
W
v.
0
V
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 4729
Exhibit C
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
In addition to all applicable provisions of the El Segundo Municipal Code
( "ESMC "), the City of El Segundo, agrees to comply with the following provisions
as conditions for the City Council's certification of a Final Environmental Impact
Report for Environmental Assessment (EA No. 836) ( "Project Conditions ").
All mitigation measures in the final Environmental Impact Report for the El
Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project are incorporated by
this reference into these conditions of approval. All mitigation measures
and conditions of approval must be listed on the plans submitted for plan
check and on the plans for which a building permit is issued.
2. Before the City issues a building permit for a project at the Urho Saari
Site, a sign plan must be submitted with permanent on -site signage that
clearly identifies that off -site parking locations are available for the facility.
These signs must be clearly visible to vehicles seeking to park at the Urho
Saari facility and must provide the location of the off -site parking.
3. Bus parking for special events, such as swimming or water polo
competitions, at the Urho Saari Site or the Hilltop Park Site must be
provided at an off -site location. The off -site location cannot be on
residential streets in the vicinity of either the Hilltop Park site or the Urho
Saari site.
PAPlanning & Building Safety \0 Planning - Old \PROJECTS (Planning) \826 - 850 \EA 836 \City Council 8.16.2011 \Reso
Attachments\EA 836 Exhibit C Conditions of Approval.doc
