Loading...
CC RESOLUTION 4729RESOLUTION NO. 4729 A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 836; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE AQUATICS SITE FEASIBILITY ALTERNATIVES PROJECT WITH POTENTIAL MUNICIPAL SWIMMING POOL LOCATIONS AT 301 MARYLAND STREET, 530 EAST IMPERIAL AVENUE, AND 219 WEST MARIPOSA AVENUE; AND DETERMINING THAT THE EXISTING RESERVOIR STRUCTURE AT 301 MARYLAND STREET IS NOT A LOCAL CULTURAL RESOURCE. The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares that: A. In August 2005, the City completed an Aquatics Master Plan that set out goals to address the City's current and future aquatic facilities needs. A true and correct copy of the 2005 Aquatics Master Plan is on file with the Department of Planning and Building Safety and is incorporated by this reference; B. On December 16, 2008 the City Council awarded a consultant contract to produce an Pool Alternatives Study to evaluate site feasibility and site selection for new municipal aquatics facilities; C. On April 20, 2009, the City of El Segundo filed an application for an Environmental Assessment (EA No. 836) to review the EI Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) at three potential locations; 301 Maryland Street, 530 East Imperial Avenue and 219 West Mariposa Avenue; D. The City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA "), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations § §15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines "), and the City's Environmental Guidelines (City Council Resolution No. 3805, adopted March 16, 1993); E. In addition, the application was reviewed by the City's Planning and Building Safety Department for, in part, consistency with the General Plan and conformity with the El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC "); F. The Department of Planning and Building Safety completed its review and scheduled a public hearing regarding the application before the Planning Commission on July 14, 2011; G. On July 14, 2011 the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the Project including, without limitation, information provided to the Planning Commission by City staff and public testimony; H. The Planning Commission considered the information provided by, without limitation, City staff and public testimony. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2699 recommending certification of the final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the proposed project. The Planning Commission also recommended that the City Council determine that the existing reservoir structure at Hilltop Park that is no longer in use is not a local cultural resource. That Resolution, and its findings, were made based upon the evidence presented to the Commission at its July 14, 2011 hearing including, without limitation, the staff report submitted by the Department of Planning and Building Safety; On August 16, 2011, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing in the Council Chamber of the El Segundo City Hall, 350 Main Street to receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the applications including, without limitation, information provided to the City Council by City Staff and public testimony; and J. The City Council considered the information provided by, without limitation, City Staff and public testimony. This Resolution, and its findings, are made based upon the evidence presented at the Planning Commission at its July 14, 2011 hearing; and at the City Council hearing on August 16, 2011 including, without limitation, the staff reports submitted by the Planning and Building Safety Department. SECTION 2: Factual Findings and Conclusions. The City Council finds that the following facts exist: A. The El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project consists of environmental evaluation of three subject sites: 301 Maryland (Hilltop Site) in the Open Space (O -S) and Public Facilities (P -F) Zones, 530 East Imperial Avenue (Imperial Site) in the Planned Residential Development (PRD) Zone; and 219 West Mariposa Avenue (Urho Saari Site) in the Open Space (O -S) and Public Facilities (P -F) Zones; B. The proposed project consists of two options at the Hilltop Site. Option 1 is a 40 -meter long, 25 -yard wide competition pool with associated 2 bleacher seating and bathhouse. Option 2 consists of a new competition pool and a new recreation pool as well as additional supporting facilities; C. The proposed project consists of two options at the Imperial Site. Option 1 is a 40 -meter long, 25 -yard wide competition pool with associated bleacher seating and bathhouse. Option 2 consists of a new competition pool and a new recreation pool as well as additional supporting facilities; D. The proposed project consists of one option at the Urho Saari Site. This option consists of renovation and expansion of the existing aquatics facility at the Urho Saari Swim Stadium. A new outdoor 40 meter long, 25 -yard wide competition pool with bleacher seating and shade structures would be sited north of the existing indoor pool building. The existing indoor facility would be converted into a new recreation pool and therapy pool. Existing restrooms and change areas would be renovated and additional supporting facilities including a new mechanical room, office and storage space would be added to the facility; E. The 2.11 -acre Hilltop Site is surrounded by the following land uses: A City Public Works Water Division yard to the north, multi - family residences to the east, multi - family residences, a church and school to the south, and single family residences, a daycare and church facilities to the west; F. The 1.34 -acre Imperial Site Option 1 and 2.2 -acre Imperial Site Option 2 are surrounded by a City linear park and LAX to the north, multi - family and single family residences to the east, the rest of the Imperial School site and multi - family residences to the south, and a mortuary and single family residences to the west; G. The 1.19 -acre Urho Saari Site is bound to the north, west and east by Richmond Street Elementary school and by a church and single and multi- family residences to the south; H. Uses and structures on the Hilltop Site are currently comprised of: an approximately 170 foot by 100 foot empty water reservoir which is no longer in use, an approximately 40 foot by 30 foot recreation pool with an three -foot maximum depth, a restroom /maintenance building, a playground with play structures, a paved picnic area and green park space with picnic tables and barbeques; The Imperial Site is developed with one -story brick classroom and office buildings for the no longer operating Imperial Avenue School; J. The Urho Saari site is developed with the Urho Saari Swim Stadium (aka "The Plunge "). This building contains two indoor pools, restrooms with 3 showers, locker rooms, bleacher seating, management offices and storage /maintenance space. The project site would expand outside the current Plunge building to include Richmond Street Elementary School areas currently occupied by green space and a playground; and K. Vehicle access to the Imperial Site would occur from Imperial Avenue. Access to a new proposed parking lot at the Hilltop Site would occur from Grand Avenue. Access to two new surface lots at the Urho Saari site would occur from Mariposa Avenue. In addition two satellite parking locations, the municipal parking structure at Grand Avenue and Richmond Street and the public surface lot at Mariposa Avenue and Main Street, have been identified for the Urho Saari Site. SECTION 3: Environmental Assessment. The City Council makes the following environmental findings: A. A Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for this project was completed in compliance with Public Resources Code (PRC) §15090. A noticed Public Scoping meeting was held on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 pursuant to PRC §15083. A Notice of Preparation of the DEIR was prepared and circulated for public review from July 1, 2010 to August 2, 2010 pursuant to PRC §15082. A Notice of Completion for the DEIR was filed with the State Office of Planning and Research on April 28, 2011 pursuant to PRC §15085. The public comment and review period for the DEIR was open between April 28, 2011 and June 13, 2011 in compliance with PRC §15087; B. The City received 8 comment letters on the DEIR from public agencies and individuals; C. A FEIR was prepared, which includes the DEIR, comments regarding the DEIR and written responses to such comments, a summary of changes to the DEIR and all technical appendices; D. The FEIR for the proposed Project, entitled "El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project Final Environmental Impact Report", prepared by Rincon Consultants under contract to the City and under the supervision of the Planning and Building Safety Department (State Clearinghouse No. 2010071005), is incorporated by reference; E. The City, acting as lead agency, reviewed and edited as necessary the DEIR and the FEIR to reflect its own independent judgment to the extent of its ability, including reliance on City technical personnel as well as other professional consultants retained by the City in order to provide technical 4 advice and assistance in evaluating environmental impacts associated with the Project; F. Pursuant to PRC § 21082.1(c)(3), the City Council independently reviewed and analyzed the FEIR. Based upon that review and analysis, and recommendations made by the City's Planning Agency as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2699, the City Council finds that the FEIR is an accurate and complete statement of the potential environmental impacts resulting from the Project. The FEIR reflects the City's independent judgment as lead agency; G. Pursuant to PRC § 15091, any changes or alterations required for the Project, or incorporated into the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect are identified for the FEIR. Any potential changes or alterations that may be made to the proposed mitigation measures are addressed and analyzed in the FEIR; H. The DEIR and FEIR were made available for public review and comment in the time and manner prescribed by CEQA; In accordance with PRC §15091, the record on which the City Council findings are based is located at the Planning and Building Safety Department, City of El Segundo, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, California 90245. The custodian of records is the Director of Planning and Building Safety; J. The City reviewed the FOR for the Project and considered the public record on the project, including, without limitation, the following: 1. Staff reports prepared by the Planning and Building Safety Department and the DEIR and the FEIR prepared by Rincon Consultants for the City; 2. Staff presentations at public hearings and meetings; 3. All applicable regulations and codes; 4. Public comments, both written and oral, received and /or submitted at or before the public hearings and meetings, supporting or opposing the proposed Project; and, 5. All related documents received and /or submitted at or before the public hearings; 9 K. The FEIR was presented to the City Council, which reviewed and considered information contained in the FEIR before approving the project in accordance with PRC §15090; L. The FEIR generally identifies, for each potentially significant impact of the project, one or more corresponding mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a level of insignificance, with the exception of cultural resource and noise impacts. The City Council finds that each potentially significant impact identified in the FEIR is mitigated by its corresponding mitigation measures to the extent set forth in the FEIR; M. In accordance with PRC §15091, the City Council considered written findings regarding each of the significant environmental effects identified in the DEIR before certification of the FEIR. The written findings are attached as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and incorporated by reference. Each finding includes a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The FEIR includes mitigations that lessen identified significant environmental effects to a less than significant level for those effects that can be mitigated. For the two environmental effects that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level (Cultural Resources and Noise) as identified in the FEIR, the findings attached in Exhibit "A" contain a brief explanation as to how the mitigation measures substantially lessen the two substantial environmental effects, and; N. Because of the effects identified in this Resolution, specifically the creation of significant environmental impacts as described above, the FEIR found that a Statement of Overriding Considerations would be required for any of the alternatives studied to be approved. A Statement of Overriding Consideration is included in "Exhibit A" in accordance with PRC §15093. The City Council has considered the attached Statement of Overriding Considerations. SECTION 4: General Plan. The proposed project conforms to the City's General Plan as follows: A. Implementation of the project will meet relevant goals of the Land Use Element. Implementation of the project will help achieve Land Use Element Goal LU6, which is to "maintain and upgrade existing excellent parks, recreation, and open space facilities within the City of El Segundo." The new facility will upgrade the level of aquatics facilities service within the City. A California Interscholastic Federation competition ready pool will provide training and game facilities that are currently unavailable in the community with current aquatics facilities. The new competition and recreation pools will increase aquatics facility capacity in the City improving service levels to residents. R B. Implementation of the project is consistent with Land Use Element Policy LU6 -1.2 to "encourage parks and recreational facilities to be located within walking distance of every household." All three potential project sites are located within the residential section of the City. All three sites are within a reasonable walking distance of many households residing in the City. C. Land Use Element Goal LU7 is to "provide the highest quality public facilities, services, and public infrastructure possible to the community." The new facility increases the quality of aquatics recreational facilities in the City. The existing Urho Saari Swim Stadium aquatics facility is currently deteriorating and is in need of extensive repair and retrofitting. Providing new or renovated aquatics facilities is needed to continue to provide high quality public aquatics facilities to the community. D. Implementation of the project is consistent with Open Space and Recreation Element Goal OS1 to "provide and maintain high quality open space and recreational facilities that meet the needs of the existing and future residents and employees within the City of El Segundo." The facility meets the needs of the City's residents and employees in that it provides high quality recreational swim facilities within the City. In addition the building will improve the facilities available to local schools for competitive swimming and water polo. The project will also improve facilities available for child and adult aquatics teaching. E. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CR -1(a) at the Hilltop Park Site requiring a cultural resource documentation report by a historic preservation specialist is consistent with Land Use Element Policy LU2 - 2.1 to "take an active role in documenting and preserving buildings of cultural, historical and architectural significance. This should include residential, non - residential and publicly -owned buildings." F. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CR -1(b) at the Urho Saari Site requiring review of architectural plans by a qualified historic preservation specialist for conformance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation is consistent with Land Use Element Objective LU2 -2 to "encourage the preservation of historical and cultural sites and monuments" and Policy LU2 -1 that "new development adjacent to a building of cultural, historical, or architectural significance shall be designed with a consistent scale and similar use of materials." G. Implementation of Mitigation Measure N -3(a) and N -3(b) requiring noise screening of roof -top equipment and restricted hours of trash pick -up is consistent with Noise Element Objective N1 -2 to "ensure that City residents are not exposed to stationary noise levels in excess of El 7 Segundo's Noise Ordinance standards." H. Implementation of Mitigation Measure T -2(a) requiring a Construction Traffic Management Plan is consistent with Air Quality Element Policy AQ7 -1.1 that "commercial truck emission be reduced by restricting delivery schedules to off -peak traffic periods." SECTION 5: Cultural Resource Designation. The City Council makes the following findings regarding the potential local cultural resource designation of the existing reservoir that is no longer in use at Hilltop Park: A. On July 14, 2011 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2699 which recommends that the City Council determine that the existing, unused, reservoir at Hilltop Park is not a local cultural resource; B. The existing, unused, reservoir is located within the City of El Segundo at Hilltop Park. The address of Hilltop Park is 301 Maryland Street. The legal description of the parcel on which the reservoir is located is: EL SEGUNDO LOT COM AT NE COR OF LOT 13 BLK 67 TH S ON W LINE OF MARYLAND ST TO N LINE OF GRAND AVE TH W ON SD N LINE TO E LINE OF LOMITA ST TH N THEREON 704.36 FT TH N 89 53'45" E 143.11 FT TH S 0 07' LOT 13; C. The existing, unused, reservoir at Hilltop Park is a concrete basin approximately 170 by 100 feet in size. It is currently hidden behind a landscaped berm and is surrounded by a chain -link perimeter fence. The reservoir was constructed circa 1912 as the City's first reservoir. When the reservoir was in use it was covered by a wood roof structure which has since been removed; D. The integrity of the design of the structure is substantially reduced as the roof structure is no longer intact. The integrity of feeling and association of the structure is no longer intact as the structure is no longer used for its intended purpose, water storage. The structure appears to lack sufficient integrity to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historical Resources; E. The reservoir structure meets two of the four criteria for potential designation as a local cultural resource contained in ESMC §15- 14-4B. First, the structure is greater than 50 years old and, second, the structure is associated with a significant local event as it is the City of El Segundo's first water reservoir and was integral to the establishment of the City; FP F. The City Council finds, while the reservoir is associated with a significant local event, the structure does not have distinctive architecture or method of construction, does not exemplify a particular period of local history, and does not provide aesthetic or recreational benefits to the City; and, G. The City Council finds that reservoir site poses a potential public safety hazard in its current unmaintained condition. The fencing around the site is necessary to maintain public safety and renders the site is un- accessible to the public. As a result, the reservoir has little utility as a local cultural resource. SECTION 6: Approvals. A. The City Council adopts Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations in accordance with the requirements of PRC §21081 as set forth in attached Exhibit "A," which are incorporated into this Resolution by reference. B. In accordance with the requirements of PRC §21081(a) and §21081.6, the City Council adopts a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as set forth in attached Exhibit "B," which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference. The City Council hereby adopts each of the mitigation measures expressly set forth herein as conditions of approval of the project. The other project conditions of approval and compliance with applicable codes, policies, and regulations will further assure that the environmental impacts of the proposed project will not be greater than set forth in the FEIR and these findings. C. Subject to the conditions listed in attached Exhibit "C," which are incorporated into this Resolution by reference, the City Council certifies the Final Environmental Impact Report for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project. D. Pursuant to ESMC §15 -14 -4 the City Council determines that the reservoir structure at Hilltop Park is not a local cultural resource. SECTION 7: Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. 9 SECTION 8: Limitations. The City Council's analysis and evaluation of the project is based on the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a project that absolute and perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the project will not exist. One of the major limitations on analysis of the project is the City Council's knowledge of future events. In all instances, best efforts have been made to form accurate assumptions. Somewhat related to this are the limitations on the City's ability to solve what are in effect regional, state, and national problems and issues. The City must work within the political framework within which it exists and with the limitations inherent in that framework. SECTION 9: Summaries of Information. All summaries of information in the findings which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding, is not based in part on that fact. SECTION 10: This Resolution will remain effective unless superseded by a subsequent resolution. SECTION 11: According the El Segundo Municipal Code, a copy of this Resolution shall be mailed to any person requesting a copy. 10 SECTION 12: This Resolution is the City Council's final decision and will become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED thi§�_Nlh day of August, 2011. Eric Busch, Mayor ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. 4729 was duly passed, approved and adopted by said City Council at a regular meeting held on the 16'h day of August, 2011, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, by the following vote: AYES: Busch, Fisher, Brann, Fuentes, Jacobson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAI : None Cindy Morte�6n, City Clerk WOM14 to W VIN ImArgual-AW i Ilk Mm Karl H. PMer, Assistant City Attorney 11 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 4729 Exhibit A FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS After receiving, reviewing, and considering all the information in the administrative record for Environmental Assessment (EA) No. 836, including, without limitation, the factual information and conclusions set forth in this Resolution and its attachment, the City Council finds, determines, and declares for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project as follows: I. FINDINGS REQUIRED BY CEQA. CEQA Guidelines § 15090 require the City to certify that: 1. The Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) has been completed in compliance with CEQA; 2. The FEIR was presented to the decision - making body of the lead agency and that that decision - making body reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR before approving the project; and 3. The FEIR reflects the lead agency's independent judgment and analysis. II. FINDINGS REGARDING THE POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT. A. Impacts Found to be Insignificant in the Initial Study. The Initial Study for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project, dated July 2010, identified the following environmental effect as not potentially significant. Accordingly, the City Council finds that the Initial Study, the FEIR, and the record of proceedings for the project do not identify or contain substantial evidence identifying significant environmental effects of the project with respect to the area listed below. 1. Agriculture and Forest Resources. B. Impacts Identified as Less Than Significant in the Initial Study. The Initial Study identified the following environmental effects as less than significant. Accordingly, the City Council finds that the Initial Study, the FEIR, and the record of proceedings for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project do not identify or contain substantial evidence identifying significant environmental effects of the project with respect to the areas listed below. 1. Air Quality (operational). 2. Mineral Resources. 3. Population and Housing. 4. Public Services. 5. Recreation. 6. Utilities and Service Systems. C. Impacts Identified as Potentially Significant in the Initial Study But Which Did Not Exceed Significance Thresholds in the DEIR. The following environmental effects were identified as Potentially Significant in the Initial Study. The City Council finds that the FEIR and the record of proceedings in this matter do not identify or contain substantial evidence identifying significant environmental effects of the Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project with respect to the areas listed below: Geology /Soils a) Facts /Effects (1) Seismic Event. Development of each of the five project alternatives could expose people and structures to ground- shaking and related effects during a seismic event. However, with mandatory compliance with the California Building Code, impacts would be less than significant for each of the five project alternatives. (2) Erosion. Development of each of the five project alternatives could result in erosion or loss of topsoil. However, with mandatory compliance with erosion protection measures under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Construction Permit, impacts would be less than significant for each of the five project alternatives. (3) Geotechnical Hazards. Each of the three project sites could be subject to geotechnical hazards including expansive soils, hydro - consolidation, subsidence and settlement, and inadequate existing fill. However, mandatory compliance with applicable provisions of the California Building Code (CBC) would reduce impacts to less than significant levels for each of the five project alternatives. b) Mitigation: No mitigation measures are level of significance for the Alternatives Project FEIR. c) Finding: required to reduce impacts below a El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility The City Council finds that the FEIR and the record of proceedings do not identify or contain substantial evidence identifying significant 0 environmental effects of the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project with respect to Geology. 2. Greenhouse Gas Emissions a) Facts /Effects Development of any of the five project alternatives would generate Greenhouse Gas emissions from both mobile and operational sources. However, development of any of the project alternatives would not exceed recommended California Air Pollution Constrol Officers Association (CAPCOA) thresholds and would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of Greenhouse Gases. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, for all five project alternatives. b) Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required to reduce impacts below a level of significance for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project FEIR. c) Finding: The City Council finds that the FEIR and the record of proceedings do not identify or contain substantial evidence identifying significant environmental effects of the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project with respect to Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 3. Hazards and Hazardous Materials a) Facts /Effects (1) Demolition. All five project options would involve demolition or renovation of existing structures, which, depending on their age, could contain asbestos and /or lead based paint. If these materials are not properly handled and disposed of, this could pose a risk to the public or the environment through the release of hazardous materials. However, mandatory compliance with State and federal regulations regarding the handling and disposal of these materials would result in less than significant impacts for all five development options. (2) Hazardous Materials. None of the three alternative project sites are listed as hazardous materials sites, and the five proposed project alternatives would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste. Therefore, impacts to this issue are considered less than significant for all five project alternatives. (3) Airport Hazards. The Imperial Site and Urho Saari Site are located within the Los Angeles International Airport Planning Area/ Airport Influence Area as identified by the Los Angeles County 3 4 Airport Land Use Plan. However, none of the five development options is located within aircraft take -off and landing flight paths, or within identified runway protection zones. Therefore, impacts to this issue are considered less than significant for all five development options. b) Mitigation: No mitigation measures are level of significance for the Alternatives Project FEIR. c) Finding: required to reduce impacts below a El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility The City Council finds that the FEIR and the record of proceedings do not identify or contain substantial evidence identifying significant environmental effects of the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project with respect to Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Hydrology and Water Quality a) Facts /Effects (1) Construction. During construction of each of the five project alternatives, the soil surface would be subject to erosion and the downstream watershed could be subject to temporary sedimentation and discharges of various pollutants. However, mandatory compliance with regulations and requirements that pertain to construction activity would apply. Impacts would be less than significant for each of the five project alternatives. (2) Operation. Operation of each of the alternatives would alter existing drainage patterns and increase the amount of impervious surfaces on the site. This could potentially degrade the quality of stormwater discharged from the project sites in the long term. However, mandatory compliance with Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board NPDES requirements would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. (3) Drainage. Operation of each of the five project alternatives would alter existing drainage patterns; however, this would not result in on -site or off -site flooding. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required to reduce impacts below a level of significance for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project FEIR. 4 c) Finding: The City Council finds that the FEIR and the record of proceedings do not identify or contain substantial evidence identifying significant environmental effects of the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project with respect to Hydrology and Water Quality. D. Impacts Identified as Potentially Significant in the Initial Study But Which Can Be Reduced to Less - Than - Significant Levels with Mitigation Measures. The City Council finds that the following environmental effects were identified as Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated in the Initial Study and FEIR, and implementation of the identified mitigation measures would avoid or lessen the potential environmental effects listed below to a level of significance. Aesthetics. a) Facts /Effects: (1) Visual Character. Each of the five project alternatives involves the construction of surface parking lot along a public road. This could potentially degrade the existing visual character of any of the three potential sites. Implementation of Mitigations Measures AES - 2(a-c), which require landscape screening of surface parking areas, would reduce impacts to visual character to a less than significant level. In addition, the Plunge is a designated local cultural resource and renovation of the building could impact the scenic view of the building. Compliance with CR -1(b) would reduce any impacts of the Urho Saari option to a less than significant level. (2) New Sources of Light or Glare. Each of the alternatives would result in new sources of light and glare on and around the project site. Glare generated by the proposed project alternatives would not adversely affect neighboring uses, while light could adversely affect nearby light- sensitive uses. Screening of new light sources to avoid off -site light spillover is recommended. Implementation of Mitigation Measure AES -3, which requires a photometric and lighting plan, would reduce impacts to a less than significant level for all five project alternatives. b) Mitigations: (1) AES -2(a) Hilltop Park Site Landscaping. A landscape plan must be submitted to the City before issuance of grading or building permits. The landscape plan must include landscaping at the southern, eastern and western portions of the proposed surface parking lot to screen the parking lot from public views from Grand Avenue, Lomita Street, and Maryland Street. This plan must consist of predominantly drought tolerant native and /or naturalized species consistent with the applicable climate zone and the City's Water Conservation in Landscaping regulations. All landscaping must be monitored and maintained according to the original intent of the landscape plan. The final landscape plan must be reviewed 5 and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety and Director of Recreation and Parks before the City issues grading or building permits. (2) AES -2(b) Imperial Site Landscaping. A landscape plan must be submitted to the City before the City issues grading or building permits. The landscape plan must include landscaping at the northern portion of the proposed surface parking lot to screen parking lots from public views from East Imperial Avenue. This plan must consist of predominantly drought tolerant native and /or naturalized species consistent with the applicable climate zone and the City's Water Conservation in Landscaping regulations. All landscaping must be monitored and maintained according to the original intent of the landscape plan. The final landscape plan must be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety and Director of Recreation and Parks before the City issues grading or building permits. (3) AES -2(c) Urho Saari Site Landscaping. A landscape plan must be submitted to the City before the City issues grading or building permits. The landscape plan must include landscaping at the southern portion of the proposed surface parking lots to screen parking lots from public views from Mariposa Avenue. This plan must consist of predominantly drought tolerant native and /or naturalized species consistent with the applicable climate zone and the City's Water Conservation in Landscaping regulations (El Segundo Municipal Code Section 10 -2 -5). The height of landscape planting must be controlled to maintain views of the Urho Saari Swim Stadium. All landscaping must be monitored and maintained according to the original intent of the landscape plan. The final landscape plan must be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety and Director of Recreation and Parks before the City issues grading or building permits. (4) CRA(b) Urho Saari Site. Before the City issues building permits, the Director of Planning and Building Safety must find, based on review and recommendations by a qualified, City - approved historic resources professional or preservation architect, that the final architectural plans for the proposed new construction conform to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. This finding must be based on an inventory of the building's character - defining features and final, detailed construction drawings. The Secretary's Standards applicable to related new construction and alterations to historic properties are as follows: Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation No. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. A Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation No. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work must be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation No. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. (5) AES -3 Photometric and Lighting Plan. Before the City issues a building permit, a photometric and proposed lighting plan for the project must be prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning and Building Safety Director and Police Chief to ensure that light and glare does not spillover onto adjoining residential properties. Outdoor light fixtures included in the lighting plan must be low - intensity, shielded and /or directed away from adjacent areas and the night sky. All light fixtures must be installed and shielded in such a manner that no light rays are emitted from the fixture at angles above the horizontal plane. The final lighting plan must be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Building Safety Director and Police Chief before the City issues a building permit. c) Finding: The City Council finds that the project is conditioned to avoid or substantially lessen the potential aesthetic environmental effects as identified in the FEIR. 2. Air Quality a) Facts /Effects: (1) Construction Emissions. Construction of any of the five project options would generate pollution emissions that would exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District localized significance thresholds for dust (small and fine particulate matter). Implementation of dust control measures would reduce the impact of this environmental effect to a less than significant level. b) Mitigations: (1) AQ -2 Fugitive Dust Control Measures. The following must be implemented during construction to minimize fugitive dust emissions: a) Water trucks must be used during construction to keep all areas of vehicle movements damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this requires three daily applications (once 7 in the morning, once at midday and once at the end of the workday). Increased watering is required whenever wind speed exceeds 15 mph. Grading must be suspended if wind gusts exceed 25 mph. b) Soil with 5% or greater silt content that is stockpiled for more than two days must be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. c) Trucks transporting material must be tarped from the point of origin or must maintain at least two feet of freeboard. d) Soil stabilizers must be applied to unpaved roads to prevent excess amounts of dust. e) All material excavated or graded must be treated with soil binders or must be sufficiently watered at least three times daily with complete coverage, preferably in the morning, midday and after work is done for the day. f) Ground cover must be replaced in disturbed areas as quickly as possible. g) All clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities must cease during periods of high winds (i.e., greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour) to prevent excessive amounts of dust. h) The contractor must provide adequate loading /unloading areas that limit track -out onto adjacent roadways through the utilization of wheel washing, rumble plates, or another method achieving the same intent. i) All material transported off -site must be securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. j) Face masks must be used by all employees involved in grading or excavation operations during dry periods to reduce inhalation of dust which may contain the fungus which causes San Joaquin Valley Fever. k) All residential units located within 500 feet of the construction site must be sent a notice regarding the construction schedule of the proposed project. A sign, legible at a distance of 50 feet must also be posted in a prominent and visible location at the construction site, and must be maintained throughout the construction process. All notices and the signs must indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints. 1) Visible dust beyond the property line emanating from the project must be prevented to the maximum extent feasible. D 3 m) These control techniques specifications. Compliance with site inspections by the City. c) Finding: must be indicated in project the measure is subject to periodic The City Council finds that the project is conditioned to avoid or substantially lessen the potential air quality environmental effects as identified in the FEIR. Biological Resources. a) Facts /Effects: (1) Bird Habitat. All three potential sites contain non - native, mature landscape trees, which may be removed as a result of the project. No protected species were observed on -site. The mature trees could provide nesting habitat for raptors and /or migratory bird species. Restricted times on tree pruning and /or removal or pre - construction nesting surveys and monitoring will mitigate any environmental effects to a less than significant level. b) Mitigation: (1) BIO -1 Migratory Bird Species Act Compliance. To avoid the accidental take of any migratory bird species or raptors, the removal or pruning of trees must be conducted between September 15 and February 15, outside of the typical breeding season, as feasible. If avoiding the nesting season is infeasible, a qualified biologist/ornithologist satisfactory to the City's Environmental Analyst must conduct focused nesting surveys weekly for 30 days before grading or initial construction activity. The results of the nest survey must be submitted to the City in writing within one week after completion for review. No grading or other construction activity can occur before the City reviews the survey report. The last survey cannot be conducted less than three days before any proposed clearance of vegetation or other construction activity. In the event that a nesting migratory bird species or raptor is observed in habitat/trees to be removed or within 250 feet of the construction work areas, the applicant must delay all construction work in the suitable habitat area or within 250 feet of the nesting activity until after September 15, or continue focused surveys in order to determine when nesting activity has ceased. If an active nest is found, clearing and construction within 50 -250 feet of the nest, depending on the species involved (50 feet for common urban - adapted native birds and up to 250 feet for raptors), must be postponed until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged, and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Limits of construction to avoid a nest site must be established in the field with flagging and stakes or construction fencing. Construction personnel must be instructed regarding the ecological sensitivity of the fenced area. E Once the pre- construction bird surveys are conducted by a qualified biologist during the proper seasons, the report results, including survey dates, exact species observed and location of species onsite, must be submitted to the City for review and approval. No construction may begin before this approval. c) Finding: The City Council finds that the project is conditioned to avoid or substantially lessen the potential biological resource environmental effects as identified in the Initial Study. 4. Cultural Resources. a) Facts /Effects. Modification to Urho Saari Swim Stadium. The project at the Urho Saari Site involves alterations to a structure designated as a historic resource. Mitigation Measure CR -1(b) would reduce the environmental impacts of the project to a less than significant level. b) Mitigation: CR-1(b) Urho Saari Site. Before the City issues building permits, the Director of Planning and Building Safety must find, based on review and recommendations by a qualified, City- approved historic resources professional or preservation architect, that the final architectural plans for the proposed new construction conform to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. This finding must be based on an inventory of the building's character - defining features and final, detailed construction drawings. The Secretary's Standards applicable to related new construction and alterations to historic properties are as follows: Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation No 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation No 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work must be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. Secretary of the Interior additions and adjacent undertaken in such a rr 10 Standards for Rehabilitation No 10. New or related new construction will be anner that, if removed in the future, the 5 I. essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. c) Finding: The City Council finds that the project is conditioned to avoid or substantially lessen the potential cultural resource environmental effects at the Urho Saari site as identified in the FEIR. The environmental effects of the project at the Imperial site are less than significant without mitigation as identified in the FEIR. Land Use /Planning a) Facts /Effects: The proposed project would be generally compatible with existing adjacent land uses in the vicinity of each of the three project sites, with incorporation of mitigation measures included in the transportation, air quality, aesthetics and noise sections of the final EIR. Incorporation of the mitigation measures of the identified sections would reduce the environmental impacts below the threshold of significance. b) Mitigation: The mitigation measures identified in Sections 4.1 (Aesthetics), 4.2 (Air Quality), 4.9 (Noise), and 4.10 (Transportation and Circulation) would reduce impacts that could lead to land use conflicts to levels that would avoid significant land use compatibility impacts. c) Finding: The City Council finds that project is conditioned to avoid or substantially lessen the potential land use environmental effects as identified in the FEIR. Noise. a) Facts /Effects. Operational Noise. Operation of any of the project alternatives would generate noise levels that may periodically be audible to existing uses near the project site. Such noise sources include stationary equipment such as rooftop ventilation and heating systems, trash hauling, surface parking, and general activities associated with recreational uses. Impacts would be mitigated to below a level of significance with the incorporation of mitigation measures N -3(a) and (b). b) Mitigation: (1) N -3(a) Rooftop Ventilation. Parapets must be installed around all rooftop ventilation systems to shield noise from nearby sensitive receptors. 11 (2) N -3(b) Trash Pick -Up. All trash pickups must be restricted to daytime operating hours (7:00 AM to 10:00 PM Monday through Friday, and 8:00 AM to 10:00 PM on weekends). c) Finding: The City Council finds that project is conditioned to avoid or substantially lessen the potential operational noise environmental effects as identified in the FEIR. 7. Transportation and Circulation a) Facts /Effects: Construction Traffic. Traffic associated with construction activities for any of the project alternatives would result in potentially significant traffic impacts as a result of haul truck traffic volumes, construction - worker parking, and cumulative construction traffic. Impacts would be mitigated to below a level of significance with the incorporation of mitigation measures T -2(a) and T -2(b). b) Mitigation: (1) T -2(a) Construction Traffic Management Plan. A Construction Traffic Management Plan must be prepared before the City issues demolition, grading or building permits. The plan must, at a minimum, address the following items: a) Maintain existing access for land uses in proximity to the project site during project construction. b) Schedule deliveries and pick -ups of construction materials to non -peak travel periods, to the maximum extent feasible. c) Coordinate deliveries and pick -ups to reduce the potential of trucks waiting to load or unload for protracted periods of time. d) Minimize obstruction of through- traffic lanes. e) Control construction equipment traffic from the contractors though flagman and traffic control devices. f) Identify designated transport routes for heavy trucks (in addition to haul trucks) to be used over the duration of the proposed project. g) Schedule vehicle movements to ensure that there are no vehicles waiting off -site and impeding public traffic flow on the surrounding streets. h) Establish requirements for loading /unloading and storage of materials on the project site, where parking spaces would be encumbered, length of time traffic travel lanes can be 12 encumbered, sidewalk closings or pedestrian diversions to ensure the safety of the pedestrian and access to local businesses. i) Coordinate with adjacent businesses, residents, institutions, and emergency service providers to ensure adequate access exists to the project site and neighboring commercial, institutional, and residential uses. (2) T -2(b) Worker Parking Management Plan. A Worker Parking Management Plan must be completed before the City issues demolition, grading or building permits. To the maximum extent feasible, all parking for workers must be accommodated on the project site. During any demolition and construction activities when construction worker parking cannot be accommodated on the project site, the Plan must identify alternate parking locations for construction workers and method of transportation to and from the project site for approval by the City 30 days before commencement of construction. The Construction Workers Parking Plan must include appropriate measures to ensure that the parking location requirements for construction workers will be strictly enforced. These include, without limitation, the following: a) Provide all construction contractors with written information on where their workers and their subcontractors are permitted to park and provide clear consequences to violators for failure to follow these regulations. This information will clearly state that no parking is permitted on any residential street. b) Prohibit construction worker parking within 500 feet of the nearest point of the project site except within designated areas. The contractor is responsible for informing subcontractors and construction workers of this requirement. c) Identify sites where construction workers could park off -site, if necessary. In lieu of the above, demolition and construction activities may be phased such that all construction worker parking can be accommodated on the project site throughout the entire duration of demolition and construction activities. c) Finding: The City Council finds that project has been conditioned to avoid or substantially lessen the potential construction traffic environmental effects as identified in the FEIR. E. Sianificant Unavoidable Effects that Cannot be Mitigated to a Level of Insignificance. The City Council finds that the following environmental effects were identified as Significant and Unavoidable in the FEIR. Implementation of the identified mitigation 13 measures would lessen the potential environmental effects to the extent feasible but not below a level of significance. 1. Cultural Resources. a) Facts /Effects. Either Hilltop Site option would involve demolition of a potentially historic reservoir structure. Cultural resource impacts would be significant and unavoidable under the Hilltop Site alternatives. Mitigation Measure CR -1(a) would reduce the cultural resource impact of the two Hilltop Site options, however the mitigation would not reduce the impact below the threshold of significance. b) Mitigation: CR -1(a) Hilltop Park Site. A historic preservation professional qualified in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards must be selected by the City of El Segundo to complete a documentation report on the City Reservoir structure. The structure to be demolished must be documented with archival quality photographs and sketch location plans, and /or existing as -built plans, if available. This documentation, along with historical background prepared for this property, must be submitted to an appropriate public repository approved by the City. The documentation reports must be completed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety before the City issues demolition permits. c) Finding: The City Council finds that the project is conditioned to lessen the cultural resource environmental effects at the Hilltop Park Site as identified in the FEIR. The environmental impacts of the project at the Hilltop Park Site cannot be mitigated below the threshold of significance. 2. Noise. a) Facts /Effects. Construction Noise. Construction of any of the five options at the three alternative sites would result in the generation of noise that would exceed thresholds of significance at nearby residences and schools. Mitigation Measures N -1(a) through N -1(d) will reduce construction noise impacts, however these impacts cannot be feasibly mitigated below a threshold of significance. Construction noise impacts would be unavoidably significant for all five development options. b) Mitigations: (1) N -1(a) Staging Area. Contractor must provide staging areas on site to minimize off -site transportation of heavy construction equipment. These areas must be located to maximize the distance 14 between activity and sensitive receptors. This would reduce noise levels associated with most types of idling construction equipment. (2) N -1(b) Diesel Equipment Mufflers. All diesel equipment must be operated with closed engine doors and must be equipped with factory- recommended mufflers. (3) N -1(c) Electrically- Powered Tools and Facilities. Electrical power must be used to run air compressors and similar power tools and to power any temporary structures, such as construction trailers or caretaker facilities. (4) N -1(d) Additional Noise Attenuation Techniques. For all noise - generating construction activity on the project site, additional noise attenuation techniques must be employed by the construction contractor to reduce noise levels. Such techniques must include, but are not limited to, the use of sound blankets on noise generating equipment and the construction of temporary sound barriers between construction sites and nearby sensitive receptors. c) Finding: The City Council finds that the project is conditioned to lessen the construction noise environmental effects at all three project sites as identified in the FEIR. The construction noise environmental impacts of the five project options cannot be mitigated below the threshold of significance. F. Insianificant Cumulative Impacts. The City Council finds that the Initial Study and FEIR and the record of proceedings in this matter do not identify or contain substantial evidence which identifies significant adverse cumulative environmental effects associated with the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project with respect to the areas listed below: Aesthetics 2. Agricultural and Forest Resources 3. Air Quality 4. Biological Resources 5. Cultural Resources 6. Geology and Soils 7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 9. Hydrology and Water Quality 10. Land Use and Planning 15 11. Mineral Resources 12. Noise 13. Population and Housing 14. Public Services 15. Recreation 16. Transportation/Traffic 17. Utilities and Service Systems There are no significant cumulative impacts. G. Growth Inducing Impacts. The City Council finds on the basis of the FEIR and the record of proceedings in this matter that there are no growth inducing impacts. H. Proiect Alternatives. 1. Reasonable Range of Alternatives. a) Alternatives EIR. The proposed project has five potential alternative designs and three potential alternative project sites. The FEIR is an Alternatives EIR that analyzes the proposed project alternatives at equal levels of detail. Thus the analysis throughout the FEIR fulfills Public Resources Code (PRC) §15126.6 which requires that the FEIR "describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives." b) Findings. The City Council finds that the FEIR and the record of proceedings in this matter describe a reasonable range of alternatives that could feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Project. The City Council also finds that the FEIR and record of proceedings in this matter contains sufficient information about each alternative to allow for meaningful evaluation, analysis and comparison of the alternatives. 2. No Project Alternative. a) No Project. The "No Project' alternative would involve no physical change to any of the potential project sites. The existing site improvements to the Hilltop Park Site, Imperial Site and Urho Saari Site would remain and no demolition or constriction would occur. This alternative would involve no change to the average daily 16 vehicle trips to any of the sites. The "No Project" alternative would avoid significant and unavoidable impacts associated with construction noise at the Hilltop Park Site, Imperial Site, and Urho Saari Site. The "No Project' alternative would avoid a significant and unavoidable cultural resources impact at the Hilltop Park Site. The "No Project' Alternative would also avoid potentially significant, but mitigable impacts related to aesthetics, air quality, cultural resources, land use, noise and traffic. The "No Project' alternative would be environmentally inferior to the five project alternatives with respect to water quality and hydrology as development of the project would improve water quality at each of the three sites as discussed in the FEIR. In addition, the "No Project' alternative would be environmentally inferior to the Urho Saari Site option in respect to aesthetics as that project option would improve the aesthetic quality of that site. b) Finding. The City Council finds that the "No Project' Alternative would not achieve the basic project objectives as stated in FEIR Section 2.0, Project Description. These objectives are to "Analyze the feasibility of alternative locations and design options for development of increased aquatic recreational opportunities with the City of El Segundo" and "Identify the most feasible alternative for the development of a modern public recreational aquatics facility." 3. Environmentally Superior Alternative. In compliance with PRC §15126.6(d), a matrix displaying the major characteristics and significant environmental effects of each alternative is included in FEIR Section 6.0, Alternatives. The purpose of this matrix is to summarize a comparison of project alternatives. Pursuant to PRC §15126.6, it is required that one alternative be identified as the environmentally superior alternative. Furthermore, if the environmentally superior alternative is the "No Project' alternative, the FEIR must also identify the environmentally superior alternative from among the other alternatives. FEIR Table 6 -2 is the matrix comparing alternatives. In this table the "No Project' alternative is identified as the environmentally superior alternative. The Hilltop Site Option one (competition pool only) is identified as the most environmentally superior project alternative. III. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The City Council finds on the basis of the FEIR and the record of proceedings in this matter that the unavoidable significant impacts of the Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project as discussed in Section II.D. above are acceptable when balanced against the benefits of the Project. This determination is based on the following substantial public and social factors as identified in the FEIR and the record of proceedings in the matter. Each benefit set forth below constitutes an overriding consideration warranting approval of the project. The need for an additional aquatics facility in the City was identified in an Aquatic Facility Needs Analysis contained in the City of El Segundo Aquatics Master Plan (August 2005). This document identified the aquatic recreation facility and program needs based upon community and stakeholder input as well as a demand and needs analysis. A copy of the Aquatics Master Plan is available in the Planning and Building Safety Department and is incorporated into this Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) by reference as if fully set forth. 17 • A new aquatics facility in the City would provide a substantial social benefit to the City. As identified in the Aquatics Master Plan there is a substantial deficit in aquatics facilities in the City for competition and exercise /class uses and a deficit in aquatics facilities for recreational uses. • The long term recreational benefits of a public aquatics facility to the community and aquatics facility users in the City, as set forth and explained in the Aquatics Master Plan, outweigh the short-term construction noise impacts of the Project. The improvement to the recreational amenities term recreational benefits of a new aquatics unmaintained, unused and inaccessible surfac e designation as a local cultural resource. IV. SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. available at Hilltop Park and the long facility outweigh the preservation of a reservoir that is potentially eligible for The City Council finds and declares that substantial evidence for each and every finding made herein is contained in the FEIR, which is incorporated herein by this reference, and in the record of proceedings in the matter. V. CERTIFICATION OF EIR The City Council hereby certifies that the Final Environmental Impact Report SCH #2010071005, dated August 2011, for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et sue. PAPlanning & Building Safety \0 Planning - Old \PROJECTS (Planning) \826 - 850 \EA 836 \City Council 8.16.2011 \EA -836 Exhbit A CEQA Findings of Fact.doc 18 El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project EIR Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 4729 EXHIBIT "B" Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project, proposed in the City of El Segundo, California. Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a) requires that a Lead Agency adopt an MMRP before approving a project in order to mitigate or avoid significant impacts that have been identified in an Environmental Impact Report. The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure that the required mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report are implemented as part of the overall project implementation. In addition to ensuring implementation of mitigation measures, the MMRP provides feedback to agency staff and decision - makers during project implementation, and identifies the need for enforcement action before irreversible environmental damage occurs. The following table summarizes the mitigation measures for each issue area identified in the Environmental Impact Report for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project. The table identifies each mitigation measure; the action required for the measure to be implemented; the time at which the monitoring is to occur; the monitoring frequency; and the agency or party responsible for ensuring that the monitoring is performed. In addition, the table includes columns for compliance verification. Where an impact was identified to be less than significant, no mitigation measures were required. However, for Transportation and Circulation two recommended mitigation measures are included for impacts that are less than significant. City of El Segundo m W U a) 0 a N E Q r N m U U- 7 Q Q O c U U) W O G d N W v. O Lq C O fy v 2 c O U m d m c Aa � E V c w -0 (D coo � c 0 m c f) TJ O N w� Qf N' O m V% N O O N W C CD m ��d o =t c�� ma o c cad ma- �a �rn� _� �� U•-- = c a) c BTU _-0 2 U� U` -' c•- U c Uv>pam mm m 0U)0dm moOf m C C U 0 c 7 c 0 U - 0- c 7 c p ° N W cu °° ° y ,�0+ 3 C Q U° a L c C) y- O a H C« v LL U U U E �f0 O O O N C Orn. c U ` U y 0 ww.0 0 0 0 �+ _N N C m � C 3 U 2 O T ao c U O" U U O T ° ao c O V D c m U fT m �'� E 0 0 2? 0 r C a'-. o CT= ° uU c a- ° ° ° v m O L m .y (m -0 m .N O a m fU O m C N L O U (D -r- rnO ° -p m 15 c E«. N m U m U U N U U m« � C •L.� C y J m« 7 C m N C a O •C « O O C Y •� N Q Q ai a spa�p a C U 3 cc C y `) .- C°7 C L" m C Q C Z cO cm C .N L 7 C U C W m cr m m U) m •U j 'N U O .O 'D a c a V c m c L f9 a m m C m m fT 0 •O a :: C) 0-6 U j (D C O .6 �O m co «'_ > c o° OIz C MD V .0 U c m,aaQO y °)� c m C U L 'C am c °av m a o> E> 3 `�•� �s d U a >vr ° 2 E m ai (D >'u m� E�aa U c v &U O U » �i�r t �� c C' c75 a U c c 075 c`) o- c a _ .S N fn f!) c N.L. m E L.L .� m o 0° c o ac E c N m U m m E E.9 O N c w O L L_ N c N 0) 3 Q j O E 4? a CL w aO E c 3 o m• - N V O fcC U �` m C U > C w �U ��'� c�� �� oU �� E o ° m y ='a o .- G O C p- O N in U c U U Of CL E ° c!c!pEvmnwoo°ce � _ CM CL u�miw °cN -0 (pa(pOaya 00« �'D (m o aa) M'a 0 nLa) cta�a� 0 O J L m 7 •� N C c c U E U a N 0 U '0 m C •U m fT'V C J E U w -0� 0 0 3-D C 0 0 C C C'pN m N E V O N Cc J N U d a N N U C�--o O fi L 7 m "' O > U O U N J m c_ C C E 4) 7 cu y E > y E •0 C U 7 .CD U m a• .V N N L a« •C N m n m N W a E L E aL O j N m C C y Y a 3 E° '(q m cn N a) m N 0 y C ,N -= m N m N L f7I� " O y •c 7 N c O fA C U E ,O fT .L-. c U U a to C� �j m T w a- C -D m- E m' C U N m 'C E U •a N O a) E � c �6 E m 0 0 N U 0 U L m -0 � aO+ f6 N m U M E _m f0 0. Q m '0 C N m Q° C m O- tm C •a U Q U = U "•' E ,04 . O E N C L N m e U m 3 E a E m y O cc9 c a a ff) fCf) v O J L C m ,U C° c-0 C 0 O� O p U a CCc M Q)—'a fah C ° _ =°-� my E pj°�~ E E aU•2 o m c a� io L y w m m m U�•° o �y �c_E L `+ N (n W .0 C (%i C 7 DO--- C -0 O U W- •� V M > •- N c U m f7) O •r L C C U m •r- U 7 w N N� «T. CM O W e ' •7 U U p •@ Q aQU..S U a°-QV) am�2 2 E `o H m mw 8) .L-' w m.S O NW s, c 3U d E O G d N W v. O Lq 9 O d N E C 0 c, a Q � C O CL M m LL v y C Uy O) U C M +O+ 7 •c Q o O� C O CM A (n 0 c W 0 V � c o m Ev O U d m y c co •a � p E v M S cu C C 0 0 U N O 0 w ` Of - `M .� ° pU ) 0 'o ac a) (A IM E w 0. m O 0 C ° wO � c � M o ° U C a C N L6 C f 7 L CL co m0X m Utnpam mU J N U w C •�0 7 E '� C f0 O y t9 a v7i c c.� w° a N c0 �° cna C c 7 �LL o �OCE _ u'= O a) w& O (ML -H€ c N M c N— N L O O .y L Mm o a 0 N (M 7 O C O C c 7 C a) C O V Q) a) 0 T (0 a U a) O a) C C-0 N N y C C C C cm C C a f0 f0 E a) 'j E w L' U 'y U m .S2 aL M .N O C_ m O a O a M 4) f9 `� 'n C w V a) C.0 « aN p No -p �` C _ C) 0 N w aC a0 O > f9 •C .N., 7 0 N a C y O a) a7 N O U,0 C N O a.0 @ � N 3 O L a-- O E C .O M E LL a 3 O m m� > c € a r a C >. �_ 'fD p aD c 3 w C M a cca ; C CC0' ay M M- 3 O n a C N u) D a (a0 M rn. C o L C y C f_CO c`a «0 o f0 G N L a •C C N C O C E C („) U 3a) ��coNov C 'C fC0 m ID N a >� N •� °aNi`o L) Q O °E> O-0 O j v°i c0 C cu ? 'N j E U c Z N 2 3Ern= 0 O a O O a a C a>i cf a) 5 o m a) 0Z 4)) E 0. ��� .0 o a>it Q,o c a� M ��.CZ N a$ C U E o >. ca a_ C O ao > O a N O 3 C N O N C Of r 7 C E N .L, N a) Q C N a U mac C O` C coy arc T) a0 00-C >3 �� m a f°C ° a 0 U y a O y C y L .� �p .0 C C p ,N C E L C O O c a nw m ° ° °� c OL .- > 7 c aaN m�a c0. yd a at �_� E � c C Ecnv•c' ° o -C .-' c rna'E o f6 a > w f0 7 O lcQ� c�.L) J N 2 to N L c 4) C M E° 0 E_ 2° j Q y N J Of L _O O U C N E U �O N C a)' ) a) N Q) f°a Q a o N C (Cp C C 3 'C r E U �O L a) c a) o (n a) N a C m p N O U C 07 J C L € f0 U f0 y E N L 'U N J O a) 0 .c O° C y N C L f0 E C a •� f0 U O L j a) M j N a ._ V L O 0 0 N 4)t Y M N N O 7. L a .� H O y C j L C M a) CI a a) 0 C' l0 E C7 U U L w w CU a O a �_ a C N 7 .0 a +-• M U T M a C .T• C_ 7 w O F- a 4) c0 .- N U N a N j >. a) •� M U) y L N o y T w a L) d O- N E m am a) O 0 -0 U) c C> O7 N r a� € w u0) cac) m AML? E u c0 C�(n C.0 a) t0 w e O t0 O w O W L c °- ° a Y> S` L ca N j a) a ti c O cm O p o ac_co o� m E 5.y o c° Ew•aa�i `-° o� o rn E a N5 ocna M p) a� �o c a7 c C w f0 m` `� e�� m c a) ac o�° aUia o.�O �;� c a� m� L a) a) a O N L.= m U �� o E'o °)C M '� L C C O C a) O y N a) M 2 W 7 U U O a C O >>� a N f0 N C c0 L C C a) O a W .0 O O •y •� L O H f0 MIX ,� Q Q U L .0 O N 2 O M.L. > U) a •> T E O H m m W O Q 0_ a .L. N m .� 0 c W 0 V Q' W 0 a NE a)a Q � c 4r m d U- C o f0 ++ = C Q O c d � 12 0 c W O o aci o Em w 'C o V d V d C �a •a � p E U w C d O � c bom OCR. U) 0 w wea•Sc 0 t5 c c N U(�pa_ m() c � •c 0 3 —>� O _ U Q 2 O L c in LL ° c o d'a m U O C Im C C C 41« V O)C EO O rn0 C U O C m f0 y m d O y y j 0 O E C N> � O U 0 �p L N N C4= y N �.. D d C O - -0 y > O 'm C�E 0- 3 .0 O � � c O m « M 0 � .0 C 0 m O � N C m t m a m U O .2 2 O N U U L = d a � °C iN a .°Lc a v O E 'a m C N m L> m o N E .E > ` N N — N N c •C 'a j H C M N L •N m CL Qao O C C6 O m `'a y 0 0) C' -0 y m 3 C)o N O m� H ° N n O_ v U N E _ N 3 „°, d min� '0 m.c O C c M.0 is >'c.0 i 2m 'r> > > o ° 0 C.0CN � y� C � E o o C L Co m N `� m N O d O 0 o N— N C m y 0 c 3= E 0 N « O m N O 0 E 0 m C y� « m cc c C a L (D co Qi E y in 0 O n: — «,E j� L m N m mQ•a� N N N ` N a) N O O C m 3 L m CL m CL E 00000 a c CL (A N N L� N C` L O N U O m E -0 c o C 0 y 0 -0 cm N -0 m N V c ° E C N E y Q E a c Y ° 0 E s a ;m n • C O L m - 01 U L N E 3 a .cO .. cn co C LN 3 Q Es o M.6 m n c a N cO. O • c« h N C O CL L Y 0 - E i%•7 m 4) 'a Y L N N O) H N O` C O ' U O m N'D N 2 E N O a C"o c O d Y U "0 m + y O � > �0 0 O N O N C m C 'C E . C U = O Y ` O U .. d C _ O2� m'_C ° - '] E-5 c m QH U O� E TES 3 c) N > N UZ ��° E 0 c W O k : � k§ c2 $a < ƒt CL \2 §g q' cr <° o■ n& E 2 k � & � G a \ E % J > A = c a / d c I o CL ■� cr 0LL a E.cu $f0 2 2 cr ■ 0 t5 > .0 :@ 0 5 & aM � j k �-0 be /2 2° ± c 0 o£ CL « 22 2�\k� §k E\�k \ ;�m k0 \ \\ 0 ra) ° 7@ 2/ !0 g2 ' >_ = 22£ ® 2 g Em f2 0 � E m :3 $ƒ Ew 2\�§f CD u 7k ' g§ 'm e -tk =m =� &F 2 -0 o °° k£ =co.gc =e 2 c m{ 0- 0 2 m o M 2 t° .o M- = U) » e c E££ ;' ° _ �: _® 2 m c» ; o f - > kE 2 2 � > c ± t - 'D = m 3t \���� 2 2 = & 4 = 2 mcr�® \ 0 _ e a \2Su 2& c000 a 2 u ` � �` \ ._ _ � 2 .g 2 E �,� m f2I2 Em 7 t 2 2 — E®$ W o @7 = g 0 §>! /c \j ; �R �� °'±a{ t§ >c �� = §:§22 =- @ "« Eo77� ■ 'N2 20 a�mE '= >� o� =0 e2o�E -�acm 3�Q ��2�� om»[ �°¥ »0- «.(��_ °m pa '_ 0 3� u« ��� =fM -02 %00gym k\ @cam /00 W (D `2Sf§> (S 2� �2. - ># ��¥�-= fCD' cm 2» m.� u> U) u�• -o= cm Z �a ems. c £ J dcf 0 �x±k( a) _E2 CDm � ■ kD:3M 0) ®�fd�k k�§ LL 4) _k» ©I ? =o ?_ (n_£/ �5 5m =Em 2£o5"0 �2m q(DQ) > 2a 2 k � & � G U N O NE c 0. a, a Q om 4t d f0 LL c U) O) C f0 +O+ = C Q O O C O d � (n . 0 c W v. O U � c o m �a E •c O U c 2 •a m p E O A c O auk c bow O. d a 0 CI - c 0.9 _ c O O U C Q:a Ui)5dm() C v � c O O C > C� 2 LL 0 O O C N .CcE aD a CL 0 cc� t c 0- rn 3 c 0 'c O 0 2 2 O yy .0 N CL C LL O .� C m >, 0 0 0 C= N 7 N 3 •C 2L Lu 3 •C N N N C L N O O _ U f9 > c O N N � y c E o O C "' O O O C - C C , .1 -a) M � 9 C O O a) > N N �. N C 0 3 cl a� Q cm -O 2 C N O o c U= N O 2 O N 7 y C C m O �' N N C U u 2Ucan) %Eascouata N A �•E y —_ o a Y w 9 5 O CL t� H m¢LO'�� a�i '� o u��i c LO. oC) m� o L '~ y N N `• c L� .D N o C m - O U `O Z � in C CL f0 N 7 >, O C� E O •O C Lp y N N O C N U M Lo O L N Q N ,U � �' 3- U E := 3 N• 5 N 0 a) 0.ZN o.0 ac ` O `°'rn o E y y= -� N U N E�Z,� -__� v E 2 >`c°'> rn a y f0 O N C L O O O.'U-' E 7 w N L (n W a„i N O U N d 0 0 O c •` •O 3 O O N O E U E U N Q c c 'O C d O N O. Q: N a a m Q m C N V N O V> Q U 7 O 'O 2 N w« ,c f0 L O_ E C N 'p E C N C O C a U N N •0 G O 'D N N O '� N Q a m C 2 N �_ O-o O N N O � •� o N O M (C- to m = d d N_ M CO •2) c N U O O L_ E Q) U L.. U N m> o'a N O .�:.9 j 0 _C C o. !p w> V y t0 > E L O !' N N- c a 0 O Z C O Yj ul N 0 O O-C y a y °~ o m C v v°�ito c p o c 3.c CL J V 0 2 w yL c c o C a C O U O C C co N .O N U ,C U .y O y U O m C fC N U ,C C O O C O _O) U p� N O .� y N w 0 C O O f0 N C O O w E A O. U C 7 p) N N D f0 C N .O-. •� U U« E N O U N 3 N a N fC0 ; L a 0 r- fC U m C C h LL m N M D) L G_ C O` N to 0) y N E Y C O. N O L O 5 N L O O > E 4' ~� O 'O O U O O w E O O N O cu O U N L Lj O C O O. U C N 3 U U - 0 CL .0 U O_ m U m U O U LL N N :..) ° L f- N 3 Of O 0 c W v. O U _x W 0 CL N E Lo f0 O) c O` a; a Q vo CL O M U- C cm y� C U •C M r = C CIO 0 c O a) 0) V% r w2 0 e W 0 U o y �a E O U > m � c 2 M p a E 2 U w c d ` o cccM _b w CL 0 C o c U Cn C v C C « N O O C c O a) L U LL C C y O .N 0 Of ` L C V V y O 30� c `D o= N N m .N c O pO G a� CL M O Q 3 a) E > O U Q' 0 i0 C c y O C y N O > L C O- N« c CL p 0 a) Y :� fU9 N O E N C N L C 0 LE U) c M U Q •� O -= a p O a m a) C U. C E _> w in M C C-0 c O m 3 m c= m U m ,D M O= rn N oo a) _. a) C o c m� L U y 0 "y' L L N C O O 2 T N C M 0-0 f0 O U '� a) O a) .; N O y U �p C O d w C _ C _a = C E ... O L .-. � O N L y 3 >. cc L a) c = f0 .�. a) C U a) a) a) ` v N M N C J N N 0 0 0= y O E Q M c O U W (D— aCi c� Hw O o m � c. —0 o o.m� = c E y( o� no N> c N (D 7 a) O Ld a) - 0-0 = O M N O Q.c N W m m or �1 Mo _ p .L.. O � r a) rn- L c N N V w N O C r. w E O U C O ? f0 N C-0 �_ O C CM _- O N c� _ U N c .N 7 N _• = c6 C •� L« «� f0 Y O fD _> f9 E-0 m O V O O N L U y N m `" w �' •- U Ln E' L N N .0 M> N =` O C Q .'. M N Ci C> o C � fn M N d� 41 _ N N U O L O N a) >+ v w O f0 a) a) " O vi x •U O O O fC N M W f0 i N a 3 a d �_ C-D ` U r a 0 &n 0_ (D O m c d L U a W Q O 0` C c CL N U C _O c ,� M C t a) Z .> C In N a- >- N C C O C« f0 N L y N y CL O. .- O O CC C Z CL �_ C o L O O •� y U= N a) m a rn .0 N U •� N a f9 «: w y H-�? U E ��n� u 3 o m oo �� � m co UL u �� a> a) m co O� O C 0f0 C .N � N C _� •' y C N O ia OO'D a N �t J V a) y •2 0. CL C C L C E O O 00 a.0 w c L a O o° O ~ J y N � ° co_ o=�=c � mcm � c�U� � c U V n 0 e W 0 U L: n O d N m c Q L N m U- N U 3 O' Q 0 C 3 O) a) W M O CL` ci C M rn c 0 O 2 �a c y W 0 V C c o m v E E w •c o U c A! •a M p E A U c d ` `_M o f6 m cm g�a CL oc ���� oc °'cE� dQ �'5 m �rn2 ��w �amcn UU) Cl.M n c 0 m O C a O 3 c Q = N o• y c9 .` V H cy Q,2 LL E O O U 'N 'o a C N C O '- 'C C a O.L. L M -0 0 0 N O) ` a1 C V t V c O 0 0 0 0) 0 N a c .0+ 3 -0 r- o E E O �.0 0 a 4)a`) O- u3i=�c m .N L f6 U c6 • c ,� 0 >. o w` N E f0 tq a) .-. a .L. C N U N fA c L C .L-• O �cp M M O-o N c9 �cOpp V N O N '� 3 .0 "Co a U N - N V U W= rte'• f`0 C fC ; fN O 'D W c -- C M N E L al c !6 C N N � c N f0 N C.0 a) «. O a C fD N C N N c a (n u �, cco p O �p E= 0 i[ c0 O -0 -0 .y L N 0 O a L •� = a M N> L «6 2 C Q a c0 f9 �` ?- 2 a) (n « C f O N 3 0 a M M O a) •L (n i3 Q a) f9 7 c6 4) C 7 N .0 E> p .� E O •N U U p f9 NN .O L M 'D c N N -OV- J« t a) y- 2 >` N m •f° � C C V N •C 2 �6 'N N 7 t O 7 E 0 U - X 0 0 ,O O C f9 t� C .� 3 y C a O E L N 2 ��pp N C O O L O E N t co C f9 .L.+ N Q CL= .. a 0 CL) f>9 N (0 N .L. C O 0 V m� �_Q > v VZ (D L) ' E N E cc C-) E C a� f• O 7 7 0 a) E E >` L V N Z' .0 Z' O a) aj voi a Q(D aZis �o ui�,( 41� 4o °•c U N �� a @�o _ o,o N E �« a� ° aa`V,o c '3 °- `o -c°•- a��i -w o� o M (D Lam. -�0p >,._~ 0)i C)i aci o C 15 z to j C N L O a O N Z' N •�.• U U .O ' CO N O N= C 'U L N C U 4) N Tt 0 O W CD E M 30 p O U 0 3 N C w O V a) N _ y w :°. 0 aa�� 3 �U. o N L O O « a) a) aC a Q p .LO-. y cO a N _ m c� 0 0 0 �•- ca "a_ c 0 0 f0 O 0 a) E L N '�- U C O :° a) « E N d p U «L. M O) a �€ V N 0 OC d .r L a O O O` aC, O 0) a -0c ,� 0.0 O N a) io M - -p N «` C fV6 f9 O CL 0 0 0_ cnE =3V�f6 a� a a 2 N Li N U _ :O Nwrn oZaOf°�NC�O- ow��> R Q j U . s U N` M w ri L M a M-0 0 o C v cc0 L N M -0 U a M +�'D 7 C al E M M O O O@-0 E O O '0 CL N D1m a) >' 0 •O N 7 to N C a) Z O V 7 0 O V E c) U N O N N c O« c) _ 'c ca O 'o Vcn��a o a`� E c m °)N f� C N U L O t0 a O M 3 y L �- m c 2 2 c -0� 3 0 0-0 c O c N W c N-D O X U 7 Z' O O_'C 7 a) 0 o o E O D c N Q1 C 0 0 M to «� C' a7 +�.. O C .� O a) C O w 'y m 0 C t0 c a � N@ 0 v L a7 3L rn� c E '� O 3 t5 O Y 7 N= 0 'N Q to N N O V VO C.0 Q � a) c y :3 0 w V a) '� a) U) _O C w O) aj O C� O E Z' �j .0.. 2 = L C L f9 a) a a) a) a c6 �Uv N E ac0f —LL �NL OU C N f6 Q O a) a) �.- L w C L N 4) V N O U.NdL t9 aw C OH O M _ L 0 om O_N m.�` �a c y W 0 V 714 ir, U N 'o a tq E fa � �O a Q � �'t CL m d Q: U- m c m <n Of t� C fa +_O+ Q C Q o o� c o CM N m w2 a c m W O U 6b C o d a E 4= c o U C .a 0 E U �o S N ` O c u ' w c m b o o� C a yQ c O.9 c ° �° cai � w° c_c o c 0 o m 4) m c 0 12 Utnpa- mcn UtnOa- mcn U o y Oi 0 .p p N t U ?^ p �>p. c U J 2LL c C 0,c N c O c ° 00m c CL -0mU a « tm c m c rn •° c U cm C_ L C v O O U 3�o U U N2o,2 p) y mo 0 �O c •C •C U C C c m U D U O m Q N « € (D T �_ C f- > > O fa ° m a o aN co N y� 0 m` aa) c c E o c O C o MG N O N t L E N c o c° N a .0 0 o v, E -.o E$': c�•� 3 0 3 Q m 'C O CL L-0 O a t m U N p C j N N � E > o �•� y y E m H r m O N c C c� c aE N D1 7 C L N c (n a O U m'a m N N U LL O CL C N N N LL j O d c c N .N• L m N -0 L ._ C O c — d V a ° c 3 o N m'3 € r ° c �.N °«�,N CD E E QL a H Q O o y o o o u, c° m Uc C - o 0 3 `° N L ` C U C y 0 .2 c� a - •C to 04---0 w O E° N y L9 �N °' y N 0 O o y o 4 io� 2L aci o m m ° U� c E i o -0 -0 9H N mom; �,m � E a- m m c 0 0 Qa 5 c N M z 0 OL « a� E c cn3f°2uai�'a�i)N�m �yccy.`� UyNE 3. E L aCi�Ed ; V Z C ma c a m N a LD C O D m N aCi .r .N C C m N .N a) .) 3 m N L d O N c ) m O m C m N y •3 O N E i 7 y C N° N r N w m L N O U c N N `� E a ° :� 7„ L Q N- N« m VJ O W O u m d NZ — 7 Nom, 7� NZ m rn w O �cm3m'acia>iaioc0 wca�c�03 C N y •O vrn.9CL a)0cc C - U HNN� C « c o.o a= c 5 o E� m� o,o c c�c N ca m y C O C O M c •L°. 4) H� N N _d a•c y m° N' U H f6 7 U y O T �� Y °' E m c N y .�. N N N) C 0 7 Q C O W U `U N O. O N N :►'� -j 'y .X N •c _L •; C N .c m Q) c N N SC O m m 0_ m 0` N N C E C C ° cncr N L EE 3 3 E a.G coZ m° O ,5 uNi ° m 2 ao E °cam N y L �' N O. Z� .U.. m N 2 CD U) 3 2 a c m W O U 6b _x W 2 a yE f0 Qp O ua` Q c Z' O fy0 a1 LL c r l0 � WS C f0 � 7 C Q O O c o CM m 12 C E .0 O y U a° W v. 0 V c R •a p E O U m S m ` O C c bom c bom c bwm ui iw N w ui iw�m� O O C !0 Erna O Cf 5 c w-0 - c cm ° W ° Of o �'c�� W °° 3 o °� w O O` rn O p o D t � �Uc °.2 (D N.N m'3 N �,2 m'7 f�C �, cm C._ w N @ 7 m ( CD .0 c'O 7 U _ y ca 7 (n 0 d m fn U (/) m cn '` Ucnoamcn Q) .� 7 Uv)oa ,�_' •� j c •� Ucnoam mcnoa c v cc r o c o ° �c°i� > `° c w Q p> ` �ip�� U rn U � j C N O° •U ° LL Cf N 7 c O c 5 C _ N y? ._ C U 0 c f`6 'C 'c _ _ () y rA .O c c_ •« -a o) 2 U' E C o v m V p 7 c ° d-0 m V a) N O: n O p 7 a av o 'C 'C c () a) 2 '� (D 7 0 O�-0 rn� CL ° +° O 0).2 o y c c d o 2 C m: m o a € o o U 0 y O y m c ° m Q « c 0 0 c � = m tm 2 0)w c C C w € N y y -5-5 C O N '7 m D m 0 m .N o a Q� 7 0 m .N -a 0) m � V a) C CL C a) H 'V a) m c 7 .N L N 7 .E U C.- 2 2 •y 7 p _Q-vi 2 C a) y �_ a Co 3 « V E 7 o E C 'C 2 V U O c t in C c .y N >, > C C o N C 7 cn > p _a m m 0 a) c 7 � m C C D ' 0'5 C C Q a d N i.i � a� fC ��cppp f0 L •a r m~ d U E w U N C C y O O ` N O a L C o 'O = cu N a E Y ,� m c 0.0 a) y p j C 0 .O c 3 E 3 > c ai 4) ° y C N a' U ac cvi c O O O O C U a U O. m O O UZ: y LL U m m 0 y0 - y U C a « m� O O U � m Q U m V m 0« U > 'D N C o to U c CL O. - �3 O 4) o4i y` p 7 > om y7 t a o Y rn a .0 >, S 0 Q ° a � a= U) O • ) w i cp c C t a w a m o ° 0` . c c M E � y L a 0 m° O c « ° C O cm = m a_ m 2 - � O p . y 0 0 O C c 3c a�Ei 2 H .o m a�M Y'D m m •� m LD Q EaQ o� c c -° uyi °> (°� a 0- c j .L. 'O f�D C Z O c C 7 m �' c N d p O D ci C U H O a O J y O Q 7 U 7 U p m U y y 'C y y t C c �� a� a> U-0 a) m c-- 7 c E C O p p >- Co y N co Y° U C- p 0« m E t m V C E H O y m 'C N «� C U m m c y C w 0 y a p U '_ w°° �+ V H o N 7 7 N .� CL o E 0 a) �' .0 C C �°+ > •y C y h Z 0 o a 4 y jy U C � ° y CU C 0 E Q a) C� `o .0 ay' ` N¢ -0-0 ~ ° N m 0 O C 7 a `° C O <.i d •� a) d _= U m O j m ` � •C o m• Li mC .y O E «°.�_ m itlm C m _7 m •U 2 y V C- .0 c`o .0 y E a U C y C L "' C C p .0 �q `� y y N N y 0 rn 0) 7 C E C C U U .g f6 .X LL o o H .0+ ZH v coo E c°� w° rno v Z E> c Z Ers o �i���' E a a° W v. 0 V _x W U d �O CL NE d � > V fC � C O` 0 I Q Q) U) d Q: U- C :? m U C Co r Q C Q O O c O U) 3 W 0 V C O y m E �= c O U c _5 �a m p E O U m C d ` 30 C 0 cm �Q c v 'C C w 7 Q O iLL O O) ` d C XV C" O i c a) o M �O-0 O m w U 0 c iff a) 0 �p •cr M O c'C m N N m tCU w « O Ny C m m O U c Oc c E N cc c $f0 m my `° a E V N- 0 •8 C h 6 N E O O E > M m O m$ C y as �orn�U�maO.Em t0 a N O w > - 0 O Q* V c O'D 0 N N d � .- N O L 0 .L.. = y V=1 N Q N N a 0) . f`O C U 0 O r w 0) c O m G) N 3 Y N U w Q Y y O .«+ y 7 m cm .a) 7` OL O O O c N .. O U m 3 N C m C Of Q Co C o U C v 3 aN o o N E m j N r mw n cf c: 3 •� U c �) m m O c v, 0 0 0 m N .L-1 CL = •7 L 0 E a m N N N� C L m N C � c 0 C U c O E m` a N: 0 0 C C O u > N �O W- c .E y> •m c c 7 N U N N O O w D C C« 0 O' O V A C O �[ � 4) U m C O CL m.X m m u cc� m 0.2 ui > m m nw E'mc c c o m 0 (D 2 16 E 0 mo o• t5 L a� `) r w" y °) E N " Q L L 4; O` O N m C 0) •C N O C a > y 0) N U L d t N 2 10 3 y N O 3 N N 0 D O C m 0 N V U C V O j m.- C H m a c M n 0 C .0 0 !0 2 N` ui d 0 N O 2 N N a c L C N N O N c ti c.0 U >> 0 E ac) �� (D 0 U E o H o•aU) 5 �.�y m w °off'u (n O O N y m V L U a �j �. O — O f`0 O w «. O O (=,.r- L CL L c O «. m N C C C O N U L O O. N M U L.. U N O U !� N m 3 W 0 V x w U N •O N Q N m m LL c� Q Q O v c N wl E IM 0 a c G y W 0 V C C O y «. E E •c O U c m •a � p O U eo :w S a� C c bom oaaci ea H we `o.� O :3 c .- o �i c' d Uc�Damcn T o c w° 0 m m 0 cc0 >' ° m O (0 U C O 9 2 L N N O.C•C —c �2 V .- E�� � C N C 'C c 0LE-D 07.0 aaD U O M in c � C rC W L C o LLC S V SS ° n u « O c •p C O N c C O� o m .c N N N 2 7 0 M .L D y CM N N m L G > �i ° mcmQ,NEmE a aaa c Ir d� 2v c N M w w Q LL a C i+ uai fL0 N c N C m 4. N L N« N d Q •O O a m O y 0 U E 0 M L N O M- N N w c a 0 > «N, > N O f9 m N> .- N O N� w O .L m.C° O. m d c N �G L. c' m C 7 c L O N .o., c d C� E o •N m V N` O m Y m cm o L' E aO o N�� N - m O N y m 3 c O Y E '~ ° o c>E c: E� c m o ° CL- �~ rnU a —�•° c E w or aE� o o 5i c cmi O �'� ° u; —� Y 3 ag ° `o ° '-' m e a� c m o c 0 E- °aacoi o aac d) C E N` C C� aa�3 ° � arn�.o N U �O N 2= N °v c ° d C c Y N N U `O -v N c O IM �� c T° E (D c ao.0 m E >,3 -M a o f �,cia o m o c m M o•°- BL °v io 0 3 ami c o H 2 °� -W m �� me c c 0•=° � o u y o o� � a) 3 y° E �:� cL o ou Q)0 y ad m e °� m E'> m ti -L.m N a� c E in c c�.S c _� y c 4) E ui U y a� m� �� °.cn c CM a°)H E c aNi ` Y O. 0 m Y E N c'� o�.�L m m U •> a y o 0` m C C cm :3 E N C U L O ° o o > > y 0Y•m aC= �c m$ CT 3� 6 am °a m €c ° ° y c N X O N U °) u ° E o c.m o ° E E. m o m N d 3.3 iri Q o "u o Emu m m m° N o o c f0 �.E.�'a ` O m• 0 Mo u, 9 M L� io ;) 'O m i 2- O C- o 0 « 0 j - 7 (D > c 0 c O C L C L LO p C Q :z LM.- (c N m 7 a O O p O C «� O c o N U O U N c c N L 0= c N c L M Ha E o 3 a° 3 o m 3 mU °d E o 3.E E m .O m 3 m a> E N- - a3 al- ii G y W 0 V x W U Q) 0 a N c a) Q N c0 a) LL N U Q O c rn a) G Im O CL c m o) c 0 0 i c � 0 y E tC 0 di c U .o W v. 0 V c A �a � O E 1 U w C W ° y� 0cm c bow w���cm c 16 m wo)a w 0.9 _ Oj 5C.- LU 0) C o 'c dQ ACM �. � m� rna) c =� UcnoQ- c)cn15 amcn c v ' ° C 2 L cca) cca`� Q Q -0 o o CL v O o c 0 3 a) CL �o ° � atm i (D cm c •r- c . c c r- < Q � a) M 0 y O a N c a) _ C 2 N O E L) _ c9 O - a� c U c C'a Vj f60_� f0 p t a� � 0 N�acif0a) 2L 0 C f6 y U b e f� O 'U Cr y � «�c��mE n'C N m> a) L C N t nc 3 nm o c o- o. M nvi 3 _aw a) -w C 0 —0O € a) ° y c O) N 01 a) > 0) C Z' O 'y y C a) `� O L 'O > , 'U a) C V Q _ c6 N C O U N a Y N .t.., oc.5 E acL aE _p C N i0 c0 p a) C p 0 -0 -0 E E o 0 a> a .0 7 L o c C�.c °•�4 a) L y a) m 0 .+�_' t0 Q W N cn U n N U N cn n D_ O n> a 3 L m> .�• Q W N N U FE E N n Q Cn O N CD c a) j.0 ° c0 •� N O 7 U N C G Y = p -0 Co •O y 7 _ N N C— a) a s Or- E N N.L. E C u) y c« a) j �r a) U E C m CL y L U ,� C 3 C_> " M `p C U O O 0 d O CO c f9 �_ m 0. � 'm p p N p U N lC y 0 .- m c d h '� a N.- n` E C •V C y cti U 0 :3 ccc 0 a) a U C CL ° 'O c c N ..V N N o E .� E r�M t0 - c Q' C y 'p O 'E Q L M C> U m j N CL O O C pnj «O c 0 0 E EY n� y o� a�U one olU U no Qa) ° c m a) o� > c� m > `mom a) c a) 0) c m aU) m�L°.w •°)► -�� > c r- M 3.°� 0 =t5 ° 0 C •rnH CL 0 °'aE -j rn- mU) m (D CLo ° m ao¢ o �+ S ) ti m m 2 0 O °- o CLE y N m-0 O'm c me `��° y CL -0.0 'a N a) c o1 � O O v E `°�L rncco� m C r E U O O O U a) U U N rn `0 '� R N E m��c m °' C W ca ° p CD a) O z y ���pUE°)c°� C a) O c9 � E,�O�= ayiv°iEomo°)�� rn C Z C p Ecf°idoa)� ac )10 •C a) N O 0 s V L c U U 0 M M 4U) y >> m N a c t _y X N J W (D (D E.5 m m Q 0 n m a) a)= V L .N `) X cA cn Q' N> C cn .o W v. 0 V CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 4729 Exhibit C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL In addition to all applicable provisions of the El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC "), the City of El Segundo, agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City Council's certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report for Environmental Assessment (EA No. 836) ( "Project Conditions "). All mitigation measures in the final Environmental Impact Report for the El Segundo Aquatics Site Feasibility Alternatives Project are incorporated by this reference into these conditions of approval. All mitigation measures and conditions of approval must be listed on the plans submitted for plan check and on the plans for which a building permit is issued. 2. Before the City issues a building permit for a project at the Urho Saari Site, a sign plan must be submitted with permanent on -site signage that clearly identifies that off -site parking locations are available for the facility. These signs must be clearly visible to vehicles seeking to park at the Urho Saari facility and must provide the location of the off -site parking. 3. Bus parking for special events, such as swimming or water polo competitions, at the Urho Saari Site or the Hilltop Park Site must be provided at an off -site location. The off -site location cannot be on residential streets in the vicinity of either the Hilltop Park site or the Urho Saari site. PAPlanning & Building Safety \0 Planning - Old \PROJECTS (Planning) \826 - 850 \EA 836 \City Council 8.16.2011 \Reso Attachments\EA 836 Exhibit C Conditions of Approval.doc