The URL can be used to link to this page

CC RESOLUTION 4574RESOLUTION NO. 4574 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A NEW FEE SCHEDULE FOR RECOVERING COSTS INCURRED FROM PROVIDING VARIOUS PUBLIC SERVICES. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of El Segundo as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds as follows: A. The City Council may establish fees for services under various provisions of California law including, without limitation, Business & Professions Code § 16000; Government Code §§ 36936.1, 43000, 54344, 65104, 65456, 65874, 65909.5, 65943, 66013, 66014, 66451.2; and Health & Safety Code §§ 510, 17951, 17980.1, 19852. B. Pursuant to Government Code § 66016, the City made data available regarding the cost, or estimated cost, of providing services for various fees ten (10) days before the public hearing held on October 21, 2008. C. On October 21, 2008, City Council heard public testimony and considered evidence in a public hearing held and noticed in accordance with Government Code § 66016. D. At the recommendation of the City's Departments and the City Manager, the City Council believes that it is in the public interest to establish the recommended fees to recover the costs of public services. SECTION 2: The Fees, attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated into this Resolution as if fully set forth, are approved and adopted. SECTION 3: Unless otherwise revised, the fees established by this Resolution will be automatically adjusted on an annual basis at the beginning of each fiscal year based on the average percentage change over the previous calendar year to the City's costs for administering the services set forth in Exhibit "A." The first fee adjustment cannot be made before a minimum of ten (10) months after the effective date of this Resolution. SECTION 4: This Resolution is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21000, et seq.; "CEQA ") and CEQA regulations (Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14, §§ 15000, et seq.) because it establishes, modifies, structures, restructures, and approves rates and charges for meeting operating expenses; purchasing supplies, equipment, and materials; meeting financial requirements; and obtaining funds for capital projects needed to maintain service within existing service areas. This Resolution, therefore, is categorically exempt from further CEQA review under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14, § 15273. SECTION 5: Pursuant to Government Code § 66017, all fees related to the Planning and Building Safety Department set forth in this Resolution will become effective on January 1, 2009 and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded. SECTION 6: For all other fees, this Resolution will become effective on January 1, 2009 and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded. SECTION 7: The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; will enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City; and will make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the record of proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st d of be 2 08/ Kelly McDowell, ' Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. 4574 was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 21st day of October 2008, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: McDowell, Busch, Brann, Fisher, Jacobson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: Cindy Mo esen, XIF City Clerk Aor APPROVED AS TX F060: Mark D. Hensle /) nTA Kayr H. Berger Assistant City Atjorney Fee Study Summary Schedule- Exhibit A CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FEE SUMMARY REPORT FY 2008 -09 CITY SERVICS CITY PAOPOSED FE PLANNING SERVICES S -001 ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT $3,345 per application /$1,670 per application (50% fee) for properties in the Downtown Specific Plan Area S -002 MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $3,345 per application /$1,670 per application (50% fee) for properties in the Downtown Specific Plan Area 5 -003 MAJOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $6,855 per application/$3,425 per application (50% fee) for properties in the Downtown Specific Plan Area S -004 ARCHITECTURAUDESIGN REVIEW $450 per application /$225 per application (50% fee) for properties in the Downtown Specific Plan Area S -005 VARIANCE REVIEW $6,855 per application S -006 ADJUSTMENT REVIEW $2.570 per application /$1,285 per application (50% tee) for fence height adjustment on properties in the R -1, R -2 and R -3 Zones S -007 ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT/ZONE CHANGE Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -008 PRE- APPLICATION REVIEW $3,410 per application. This fee gets the applicant two meetings with staff. Half of this fee will be credited towards any future fees for this project. S -009 TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -010 OFF -SITE PARKING COVENANT $300 per application S -011 PARKING DEMAND /SHARED PARKING STUDY $3,285 per study plus actual costs for Traffic Engineer S -012 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. 5 -013 SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -014 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW Deposit determined by staff oath charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -015 SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AMENDMENT Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -016 ANNEXATION REQUEST REVIEW Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. 5 -017 CFD ANNEXATION REQUEST REVIEW Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -018 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -019 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT $770 per application S -020 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REV Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. 10/16/2008 Fee Study Summary Schedule- Exhibit A CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FEE SUMMARY REPORT FY 2008.09 10/16/2008 PAOPOSED FE S -021 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS In House: New. Single -Use Residential - $750 Single -Use Commercial - $1,500 Single -Use Industrial - $1,500 Two -Use Mixed - $2,000 Three Use Mixed - $2,500 Amendment: Sin le -Use Protect - 250 Two -Use Project- Three Use - S -022 SMOKY HOLLOW FLOATING ZONE PROC. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -023 SMOKY HOLLOW SITE PLAN $2,060 per application - < 15,000 square feet $4,180 per application - >= 15,000 square feet S -024 DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT REVIEW Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -025 ENVIRON. CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION $130 per a lication S -026 ENVIRON INITIAL STUDY /NEG DEC /RECIR $3,545 per application if prepared only by City staff/Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -027 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REVIEW Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -028 MITIGATION MONITORING Minor - $465 per project Major - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -029 PRECISE PLAN MODIFICATION REVIEW Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -030 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP REVIEW $4,475 per map (Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by the applicant) S -031 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP REVIEW $4,845 per map plus $370 per lot for every lot over 5 (Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by the applicant) S -032 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP REVIEW $4,845 per map plus $370 per lot for every lot over 5 (Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by the applicant) S -033 RESUBMITTED MAP REVIEW $1,135 per ma S -034 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $1,365 per application S -035 LOT MERGER $1,365 per a lication S -036 REVERSION TO ACREAGE $5,245 per application S -037 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE REVIEW $1.510 per application S -038 RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT 51,345 per application plus actual costs for City Attorney S -039 CCBR REVIEW $1,350 per application plus actual costs for City Attorney 10/16/2008 Fee Study Summary Schedule- Exhibit A CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FEE SUMMARY REPORT FY 2008 -09 10/16/2008 Cl MY PROPOSED FEE 7040 HISTORIC RESOURCE NOMINATION REVIEW $7,195 per application S -041 ADMIN DETERMINATION - DIR DECISION $1,110 per a lication S -042 ADMIN DETERMINATION - PC DECISION $1,650 per application S -043 SIGN PLAN REVIEW $110 per application S -044 MASTER SIGN PROGRAM Minor - $580 per application Major - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -045 LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE PERMIT $220 per application plus $100 if a public hearing is requested. S -046 MOVED BUILDING SITE PLAN REVIEW $1,030 per a lication S -047 ZONING CONFORMANCE LETTER/REVIEW $745 per letter S -048 MODIF. TO DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL $3,250 per application S -049 TIME EXTENSION REVIEW $1,255 per application S -050 APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Resident - $1,100 per appeal for 50% cost recovery Non - Resident - $2,200 per appeal for 100% cost recovery S -051 APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL Resident - $1,550 per appeal for 50% cost recovery Non- Resident - $3,100 per appeal for 100% cost recovery Inside the Coastal Appeal Zone - No Charge per State law S -052 STREET ADDRESS CHANGE $545 per a lication S -053 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE 10% of all Building & Safety permit fees S -054 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT $745 per application /No fee for special events (including block parties) on properties in the R -1, R -2, and R -3 Zones. S -055 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT $670 per a lication S -056 ADULT USE PLANNING PERMIT Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -057 AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT $110 per application S -058 ANIMAL PERMIT $340 per application S -059 ANIMAL PERMIT RENEWAL $170 per renewal S -060 ANIMAL PERMIT APPEAL Resident - $805 per appeal for 50% cost recovery Non - Resident - $1,610 per appeal for 100% cost recovery S -061 BUSINESS ZONING CLEARANCE Home Occupation - $110 per application Other Businesses - $55 per application S -062 PUBLIC NOTICING $120 per notice or deposit with actual costs, at the discretion of icily staff. 10/16/2008 Fee Study Summary Schedule- Exhibit A CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FEE SUMMARY REPORT FY 2008 -09 -CrTY SORVICE CrrY PROPOSED E ENGINEERING SERVICES S -063 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT House Sewer Lateral Connection to Existing Sewer Main - $225 House Sewer Conenction to Existing Sewer Lateral - $145 S -064 EXCAVATION PERMIT Permit Issuance - $30 Inspection - $2.85 per linear foot of excavation or trench with a minimum of $140 Plan Check - $300 plus performance bond at a level determined by City staff S -065 UTILITY STREET CUT PERMIT Permit Issuance - $30 Inspection - $2.85 per linear foot of excavation or trench with a minimum of $140 Plan Check - $300 plus performance bond at a level determined by City staff S -066 ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -067 STREET CLOSURE REVIEW $215 per application S -068 NEWSRACK PERMIT New - $105 per newsrack Annual Renewal - $50 per newsrack S -069 NEWSRACK IMPOUNDMENT $90 per newsrack + $5 per day for storage S -070 FINAL PARCEL MAP CHECK $665 per map (Any County procesing tees are paid directly to the County by the applicant) S -071 FINAL TRACT MAP PLAN CHECK $1,565 or Actuals on 10 or grcatcr lots. S -072 FINAL MAP AMENDMENT $155 per application (Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by the applicant) S -073 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK Percent of Construction Valuation. $04100,000 - 3% $100,0014500,000 - 2% of the construction value over $100,000 $500,001+ - 1% of the construction value over $500,000 S -074 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION Percent of Construction Valuation: $04100,000 - 1.5% $100,001 4500,000 - 1 %, of the construction value over $100,000 $500,001+ - 0.5% of the construction value over $500,000 S -075 CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION ISSUANCE $1,505 per a lication S -076 RECORD OF SURVEY PLAN CHECK $382.50 per plan S -077 EASEMENT PROCESSING Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -078 QUITCLAIM REVIEW None S -079 SURETY b SUBORDINATION REVIEW $382 per plan S -080 LIEN REMOVAL $155 per lien S -081 DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEW Minor - $460 Major - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -082 STOCKPILE /BORROW SITE PLAN CHECK $340 per plan S -083 MINOR PLAN CHECK REVISION $305 per sheet S -084 STREET NAME CHANGE Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. 10/16/2008 Fee Study Summary Schedule- Exhibit A CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FEE SUMMARY REPORT FY 2008 -09 A cly SEMIC9 RO 7085 ALLEY /STREET VACATION REVIEW Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -086 ASSESS. DISTRICT FORMATION RESEARCH Deposit determined by staff Meth charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -087 CITY PROPERTY ACQUISITON PROC. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -088 WIDE & OVERLOAD PERMIT Daily - $16 per permit Annual - $90 per permit Fees are set by State Law. S -089 BLUEPRINT COPY SERVICE In House - $2.50 Outside - Actual Costs 10/16/2008 Fee Study Summary Schedule- Exhibit A CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FEE SUMMARY REPORT FY 2008 -09 A CITY SEPINE CITY PROPOSED BUILDING SAFETY SERVICES S -090 BUILDING PLAN CHECK SERVICES See Schedules B -1 and B -2, Attached S -091 BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES See Schedules B -1 and B -2, Attached S -092 MAP /PLAN /FILE SCANNING SERVICES $1.20 per sheet -8 112' x 11' $1.80 per sheet -larger 10/16/2008 Fee Study Summary Schedule- Exhibit A CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FEE SUMMARY REPORT FY 2008 -09 ilili I: Uigl- a4a FIRE SERVICES S -093 ANNUAL BUSINESS FIRE INSPECTION 100,000 - 499.999 square feet - $650 500,000 - 5,000,000 square feet - $1,300 S -094 ANNUAL BUSINESS FIRE REINSPECTION 100,000 - 499,999 square feet - $200 500,000 + square feet - $400 S -095 ANNUAL FIRE PERMIT $95 per permit S -096 TEMPORARY FIRE PERMIT $505 per permit S -097 FIRE HIGH RISE INSPECTION $1.02 per 100 square feet S -098 FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECK/INSPECT. Valuation based on Tables in Appendix B of this Report These revenues should be in separate revenue accounts. S -099 FIRE ALARM PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION Valuation based on Tables in Appendix B of this Report These revenues should be in separate revenue accounts. S -100 FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM PC /INSP Valuation based on Tables in Appendix B of this Report These revenues should be in separate revenue accounts. S -101 FIRE PROTECTION TESTING $465 per system S -102 STATE MANDATED FIRE INSPECTION $125 per inspection S -103 SPECIAL FIRE EQUIP INSP /APPROVAL $775 per request plus any outside costs S -104 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSP. PROGRAM Range I - $382 Range II - $428 Range III - $564 S -105 CHEMICAL ACCIDENT RELEASE PREV PROG 100 -1,000 Pounds: 1 chemical - $1,370 2 chemicals - $1,825 3+ chemicals - $2,280 1,000- 10,000 Pounds: 1 chemical - $1,480 2 chemicals - $2,055 3+ chemicals - $2,735 10.000+ Pounds. S -106 HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR PERMIT Smalll (6 -19 employees) - $800 Intermediate (20 -100 employees) - $1,100 Advanced (101 -500 employees) - $1,600 Permit By Rule - $1,300 Conditional Authorization - $1,000 Conditionally Exempt - $125 Large Quantity Generator - $125 5.107 NEW INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT/INSPECT New Permit Application* Sewer - $480 Off -Site - $480 On -Site - $935 New Sewer Plan. 112 - $570 3/4 - $800 5/6 - $1,255 New On -Site Plan: 1/2 - $725 3/4 - $1,010 5/6 - $1,580 New Off -Site Plan: 1/2 - $625 3/4 - $875 5/6 - $1,370 Closure Inspection S -108 REVISED INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT /INS Revise Permit Application - $230 Revise Sewer Plan: 1/2 - $440 3/4 - $610 5/6 - $950 Revise On -Site Plan: 1/2 - $550 3/4 - $760 5/6 - $1.180 Revise Off•Sile Plan: 1/2 - $440 314 - $610 5/6 - $950 S -109 INDUSTRIAL WASTE ANNUAL INSPECTION Class 1 - $244 Class 2 - $488 Class 3 - $732 Class 4 - $976 Class 5 - $1,220 Class 6 - $2,928 S -110 UNDERGROUND TANK PERMIT Annual Permit Maintenance - $770 plus $140 for each add ,l tank 10/16/2008 Fee Study Summary Schedule- Exhibit A CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FEE SUMMARY REPORT FY 2008 -09 10/16/2008 ED FEE S -111 ABOVE GROUND LIQUID TANK INSPECTION 0- 10,000 gallon - $62.50 10,001- 100,000 gallon - $125 100,001,000,000 gallons - $250 1,000,001 + 10,000,000 gallons - $1.000 10,000,001- 100,000,000 gallon - $5,000 100,000,001+ gallon - $18.750 5 -112 REVIEW OF RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -113 FIRE STORMWATER INSPECTION Restaurant - $165 Automotive - $165 1 Acre - $200 2 -5 Acres - $235 More than 5 Acres - $330 S -114 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. S -115 NEW CONSTR. FIRE RE- INSPECTION Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. 5 -116 AFTER-HOURS FIRE INSPECTION Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. 10/16/2008 Fee Study Summary Schedule- Exhibit A CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FEE SUMMARY REPORT FY 2008 -09 R 6 C f ff P OPOS D FE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES S -117 NEW BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING $40 per application S -118 BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL PROCESSING $40 per renewal S -119 FILM PERMIT PROCESSING Permit Application Fee - $640 Revision /Rider - $175 Public Right-of -Way Usage - $750 per day per location Police Personnel - Actual Costs Fire Personnel - Actual Costs Public Works Personnel - Actual Costs S -120 COPY SERVICE First 5 copies - No Charge Each additional copy - $0.20 per copy S -121 DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION $3 per document S -122 VIDEO /AUDIO COPYING $10 per tape /disk S -123 INITIATIVE PROCESSING $200 per application Fee is limited by State Law 10/16/2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE BUILDING PERMIT FEES SERVICE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS Building Permit Under $500 Valuation Building Permit $501 - $2,000 Valuation Building Permit $2,001 - $25,000 Valuation Building Permit $25,001 - $50,000 Valuation Building Permit $50,0014100,000 Valuation Building Permit $100,0014500,000 Valuation Building Permit $500,001 41,000,000 Valuation Building Permit Over $1,000,000 Valuation RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PLAN CHECK Building Plan Check Under $500 Valuation Building Plan Check $501 - $2,000 Valuation Building Plan Check $2,001 - $25,000 Valuation Building Plan Check $25,001 450,000 Valuation Building Plan Check $50,001- $100,000 Valuation Building Plan Check $100,001 4500,000 Valuation Building Plan Check $500,00141,000,000 Valuation Building Plan Check Over $1,000,000 Valuation CURRENT PROPOSED FEE FEE $15.00 $15 + $2 for each $100 over $500 $45 + $9 for each $1,000 over $2,000 $252 + $6.50 for each $1,000 over $25,000 $414.50 + $4.50 for each $1,000 over $50,000 $639.50 + $3.50 for each $1,000 over $100,000 $2,039.50 + $3 for each $1,000 over $500,000 $3,539.50 + $2.50 for each $1,000 over $1,000,000 $7.50 $7.50 + $1 for each $100 over $500 $22.50 + $4.50 for each $1,000 over $2,000 $126 + $3.25 for each $1,000 over $25,000 $207.25 + $2.25 for each $1,000 over $50,000 $319.75 + $1.75 for each $1,000 over $100,000 $1,019.75 + $1.50 for each $1,000 over $500,000 $1,769.75 + $1.25 for each $1,000 over $1,000,000 SCHEDULE B -1 $18.00 $18 + $2.40 for each $100 over $500 $54 + $10.80 for each $1,000 over $2,000 $302.40 + $7.80 for each $1,000 over $25,000 $481.80 + $5.40 for each $1,000 over $50,000 $751.80 + $4.20 for each $1,000 over $100,000 $2,431.80 + $3.60 for each $1,000 over $500,000 $4,231.80 + $3 for each $1,000 over $1,000,000 $9.00 $9 + $1.20 for each $100 over $500 $27 + $5.40 for each $1,000 over $2,000 $151.20 + $3.90 for each $1,000 over $25,000 $248.70 + $2.70 for each $1,000 over $50,000 $383.70 + $2.10 for each $1,000 over $100,000 $1,223.70 + $1.80 for each $1,000 over $500,000 $2,123.70 + $1.50 for each $1,000 over $1,000,000 I m w J D 0 w U w J w U m W U LL O w z H- LL LL w Q cn(1)w Jasa uj LL zz }05p ~ D D U m m 0 W U O LL LL a. O LL Q CL f- Z W UJ it O' LL D U w U >I W °°888800§ ' H N Ld O O O O �HN(n 000 > in 44 (AO O m H H S O O O > > O pO O pO d H O S S 00 y L 6044 O m U U L L H d) m m U U (P O d m U (vj 0 H Nt O 0 -.0-' 2 + CD N w O w H co N H -H + �tt0o H + H + O VV!! M 00 + O N + H tl- O N O) O + Y! N Qj M N 0 Ci t- O N 0�tH6s�m ci fA CO) OO H uj H 0 0 80 S S S S q in O S 0 0 0 6 m 60 N S 0 S S > �HH— Un O O 41 " " H H �- O O > > m y � 00 0 O O O m AD O Q O Q 00 O Cc OLHH c-? L H .2 U L L H m U U LL L H O m m U U M Z m 0 m m_ H O m O U + o o m 04 4- ° . N H H H H + + + H d! M O + + H (o (O (o (o + H (n co (o H H 00 00 S H N CD H C O C O O O 0 7 m O c -is @ >is FU- c o > o«.— m> ? >0$go 0Oo> O>0(5C 8OS a > O O O in r — 0 000(n(n -64 64 0 Z Lf) - - O D y V O O S 69 m r O S O O C wy C5 00 mC wN69 > 0(n44��0 wcLaaaa.cLmmm w��vvv�vv Z m m m m m m m m O z co 00055� Oo OU9io000_HOO_oo_ OHN (n 0000 N 44 (14 (n 000 > , 69H� 0 O m i 69 H! > m d H O > > m 0) O O > > p O 0 d L� 0 0 0 O H 0 0 N L to H .- r o U L L H H "O m U too. U L L i 41 m m m L O N m U O w0 O H, M O w w + N (o 0 * 0) w (o N (o �: N M O H c)) t- (O + fAHH44 6 H t + + t H OO(n(nin + O N O) st tip M 0 C•) LO S S -q: H (o (o N H H 60 8 H O S O 0 0 0 S S f9 N (On S S S > i 69 H .- (n O O N H H > 0) m S C) O O H >> m O O O O S pp O O r O y L H H r r Z U L t H L H w d m m U U H N" 0 N m m L (o o - " m m U � o 0 o o m et (D It .... ..._ + 6 O N Cl w M 0 + + .+} Hot :_:II o Lo N 00 00 M 69 tr)H CM S H � � H C C O '0 lYC m .O Y C p m 7 W> 0 7 U m > O m w m m>> O o O> _' Co o 00 S C 00 0 z >oo.o0o(°n -o O O �n �n — 44600 d S O NH 64 69 0 69 N O O Z m("OSSQD ` n 0 0 (A O O O m < <n N N to — (n > J D 69 69 69 H 69 69 0 U U U U U U U ) m L L L L L t L L Q 00 U U U U U U F- c c c c c c c c Z (C m m m m m m m wan.aa.aaaa c c c c c c c c W v'_v'v M_ v'v m m Ix ZmmOOmm0000m O z m w J o w x U i i 1 aO0 mmmm ' W J LL O m w CL d(L x m � U c c c p 1-- F- 1 W U uj LU m O LL W m m } LL m W r r :D LL ' E 0 T 7 o T V 0 o 0 V) U) 0 0 o Jaaa co 00 cc tL z z o o00 ' 5 5 ca co a O W 0 W OW aLL O Ix CL N Z W W of w X LL D U W U cc w U aO0 mmmm i d) CD L 0 0 ,- m m m m LL V! M L L L 7r- m m CL d(L c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m � i�xx xx c c c p 1-- F- L3 v v m O O m a m m d m m r r � m C E 0 T 7 o T V 0 o 0 m 0 0 o C co 00 cc SL 0 m E v U V o � CL Pp0 to N 0 a C6 O c p m y m O '€ v 0 m o CL m m m m 0 add m 0 x 0 z E 40 a .« a m E 0 0- o CL D rw J a E m L G L Cl) . a co O w 0 0 0 m m m m U � Q a 6 w w w w vivlfH TTT T L L L L 0 0 0 0 xxxx O O m m LL m m m m c m � L f0 x T d A A� LL m � m C E 0 T 7 o T V Q. m E c e`o E o m a •` :' o o SL 0 m E v U V o � CL Pp0 to T C6 O c p m y m O '€ U V N '— (n E m d m o CL m m m m add m O r0U 4) to x w c c z E E a .« a m E 0 0- o CL D 0 d J a E m L G L m . a O O O O Q w V � O O U � CITY OF EL SEGUNDO BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES ELECTRICAL PERMITS SCHEDULE B -2 Current Fee RCS Freoeposed City Proposed Fee Permit Issuance $15.00 $28.00 No Change to proposed Supplemental Permit Issuance $15.00 $21.00 No Change to proposed Residential Appliances, up to 1 hp $4.00 $28.00 $14.00 (SFR) Non - Residential Appliances, up to 1 hp $8.00 $28.00 No Change to proposed Electrical Sign $15.00 $133.00 No Change to proposed Power Apparatus (Ratings in HP, KW, KVA, or KVAR up to 5 $6.50 $114.00 $75.00 5 -20 $10.00 $114.00 $75.00 21 -50 $15.00 $114.00 $75.00 51-100 $33.00 $114.00 $75.00 100+ $50.00 $188.00 No Change to proposed Temporary Power Pole $20.00 $37.00 No Change to proposed Services, Switchboards, Control Centers, & Panels up to 600 volts u p to 200 amps SFR $12.00 $56.00 $28.00 (SFR) Non -SFR $12.00 $133.00 No Change to proposed 201 -400 amps SFR $20.00 $56.00 $28.00 (SFR) Non -SFR $20.00 $133.00 No Change to proposed 401 -1,200 amps $36.00 $315.00 No Change to proposed over 1,200 amps $45.00 $315.00 No Change to proposed greater than 600 volts $60.00 $342.00 No Change to proposed Switchboards First Section Standing Panel $35.00 N/A No Change to proposed Additional Sections $30.00 N/A No Change to proposed Page 1 of 6 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES ELECTRICAL PERMITS SCHEDULE B -2 RCS Proposed Current Fee Fee City Proposed Fee Over 600 Volt Section $60.00 N/A No Change to proposed Additional Sections $55.00 N/A No Change to proposed Receptacle, Switch, and Lighting Outlet, per fixture $0.50 $7.00 $3.50 (SFR) Lighting Fixture, per fixture $0.50 $7.00 $3.50 (SFR) Pole or Platform Mounted Fixtures, per fixture $3.00 $19.00 No Change to proposed Swimming Pool $0.00 $111.00 $55.50 (SFR) Meter Change $0.00 $37.00 No Change to proposed Miscellaneous Conduits and Conductors (per 100 linear feet $0.00 $28.00 $30.00 Inspections not specified Hourly Rate Hourly Rate No Change to proposed Reinspections Hourly Rate Hourly Rate No Change to proposed After Hours Inspection (4 hour minimum) OT Hourly Rate OT Hourly Rate No Change to proposed !Overtime Hourly Rate is 120% of the Regular Hourly Rate I i i i Page 2 of 6 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES PLUMBING PERMITS SCHEDULE B -2 Current Fee RCS Fee Proposed City Proposed Fee Permit Issuance $15.00 $28.00 No Change to proposed Supplemental Permit Issuance $15.00 $21.00 No Change to proposed Plumbing Fixtures and Vents SFR $10.00 $11.00 No Change to proposed Non -SFR $10.00 $27.00 No Change to proposed Repair or Alteration of Drainage or Vent Piping $5.00 $28.00 $14.00 (SFR) Grease Interceptor $25.00 $237.00 $125.00 Piping Single Family Residential (per dwelling unit) $8.00 $37.00 $18.50 (SFR) Multi Family Residential (per dwelling unit $8.00 $114.00 Reie Single Family Residential (per dwelling unit) $8.00 $56.00 $28.00 (SFR) Multi Familv Residential (per dwelling unit $8.00 $56.00 Lawn Sprinklers, Vacuum Breakers, and Backflow Protection Dev. Each Lawn Sprinkler System per Valve $5.00 $9.00 No Change to proposed Each Vacuum Breaker or Backflow Protection Device $5.00 $9.00 No Change to proposed Backflow Protection Device greater than 6" $25.00 $167.00 No Change to proposed Gas System For Each S stem Less than 2" $15.00 $56.00 $28.00 (SFR) 2" or more $50.00 $133.00 No Change to proposed For Each Outlet over 5 $3.00 $11.00 $5.50 (SFR) Water Heater $8.00 $28.00 $14.00 (SFR) Solar Water Heating system $15.00 $56.00 $28.00 (SFR) Sewer 0 -25 linear feet $15.00 $28.00 No Change to proposed each additional 100 linear feet $0.00 $28.00 No Change to proposed Swimming Pool $75.00 $83.00 No Change to proposed In- Ground Spa $30.00 $37.00 No Change to proposed Page 3 of 6 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO SCHEDULE B -2 BUILDING 8 SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES Pool /Spa Heater $0.00 $28.00 No Change to proposed Miscellaneous $30.00 $56.00 No Change to proposed Inspections not specified Hourly Rate Hourly Rate No Change to proposed Reinspections Hourly Rate Hourly Rate No Change to proposed After Hours Inspection (4 hour minimum) OT Hourly Rate OT Hourly Rate No Change to proposed Overtime Hourly Rate is 120% of the Regular Hourly Rate Page 4 of 6 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES MECHANICAL PERMITS SCHEDULE B -2 Current Fee RCS Fee Proposed City Proposed Fee Permit Issuance $15.00 $28.00 No Change to proposed Supplemental Permit Issuance $15.00 $21.00 No Change to proposed Forced -Air or Gravity -Type Furnace or Burner $8.00 $47.00 $23.50 (SFR) Floor Furnace - Installation or Relocation $8.00 $37.00 $18.50 (SFR) Suspended /Recessed Wall /Floor Mounted Heater - Install /Reloc $8.00 $37.00 No Change to proposed Fireplace $8.00 $76.00 $38.00 (SFR) Appliance Vents per each Inlet/Outlet $5.00 $13.00 $6.50 (SFR) Air Handling Units SFR $15.00 $56.00 $28.00 (SFR) Non -SFR $15.00 $133.00 $75.00 Single Register Ventilation Fan $5.00 $9.00 No Change to proposed Independent Venting System $14.00 $37.00 No Change to proposed Hood served by Mechanical Exhaust $8.00 $133.00 No Change to proposed Boilers, Compressors, and Absorption Systems 0 -3 HP or 0- 100,000 Btu/h $25.00 $114.00 $75.00 3 -15 HP or 100,001- 500,000 Btu/h $25.00 $133.00 $75.00 15 -30 HP or 500,001- 1,000,000 Btu/h $25.00 $237.00 $100.00 30 -50 HP or 1,000,001- 1,750,000 Btu/h $35.00 $342.00 $125.00 50+ HP or 1,750,001+ Btu/h $75.00 $447.00 $150.00 Incinerator /Kiln $0.00 $56.00 No Change to proposed Alteration to Duct Work not otherwise noted $10.00 $4.00 $10.00 Miscellaneous $30.00 $56.00 No Change to proposed Inspections not specified Hourly Rate Hourly Rate No Change to proposed Page 5 of 6 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES MECHANICAL PERMITS SCHEDULE B -2 Current Fee RCS Proposed City Proposed Fee Reinspections Hourly Rate Hourly Rate No Change to proposed After Hours Inspection (4 hour minimum) OT Hourly Rate OT Hourly Rate No Change to proposed Overtime Hourly Rate is 120% of the Regular Hourly Rate Page 6 of 6 evenue � ost pecialiStS, LLc Serving Local Governments Since 1975 Cost of Services Study for the City of El Segundo AUGUST 2008 Prepared by: Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC 1519 East Chapman Ave, Suite C Fullerton, CA 92831 www.revenuecost.com (714) 992 -9020 Copyright, 2008 by Revenue & Cost Specialists Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................ ............................... 1 CHAPTERI .......................... ............................... 3 BACKGROUND ....................... ............................... 3 Proposition 13 ................... ............................... 3 Proposition4 .................... ............................... 3 Proposition 218 .................. ............................... 4 Underlying Report Goal ............ ............................... 4 StudyPhases .................... ............................... 4 Terminology ..................... ............................... 5 CHAPTE RII .......................... ............................... 7 INTERNAL SUPPORT SERVICES ........ ............................... 7 Cost Allocation Plans - Historical Perspective .......................... 7 Federal Government Creates the Process ....................... 7 Gann Initiative Institutionalizes Overhead for Services .............. 7 Types of INTERNAL SUPPORT SERVICES ........................... 8 General City Overhead ............ ............................... 8 Departmental Administration ........ ............................... 8 Cost Allocation Plan Methodology .... ............................... 9 Internal Service Costs ............. ............................... 9 Schedule 1 - Internal Service Costs ........................... 10 Allocation Factors ............... ............................... 14 Schedule 2 - List of Allocation Factors ......................... 15 Summary of Internal Support Services .............................. 19 CHAPTERIII ........................ ............................... 21 FULLY - BURDENED HOURLY RATES .... ............................... 21 Costs Recognized by Proposition 4 .................... . ............ 21 Cost Elements in the Fully- Burdened Hourly Rate ...................... 21 Salary......................... ............................... 22 Benefits....................... ............................... 22 Employee Benefit Groups ......... ............................... 23 Schedule 3 - Fringe Benefits .. ............................... 23 "General" versus "Specific" Costs ... ............................... 23 Operating Expenses ............. ............................... 24 Overhead Expenses ............. ............................... 24 Available Work -Hours ............ ............................... 24 Results of Knowing the Fully- Burdened Hourly Rates ................... 24 Summary...................... ............................... 25 Table of Contents (cont.) CHAPTERIV ........................ ............................... 27 PUBLIC SERVICES - OVERVIEW ........ ............................... 27 Public Services ................. ............................... 27 Personal Choice Public Services .... ............................... 28 Distinguishing Between Comm -Supp & Personal Choice Public Services ... 28 Summary...................... ............................... 29 CHAPTER V ......................... ............................... 31 PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES . ............................... 31 Service Groups ................. ............................... 31 Service Center Detail Found in Appendix A ...... . .................... 31 General Commentary on Chapter Tables ............................ 32 Suggestions For Services Analyzed . ............................... 32 Special Circumstances ...... ............................... 33 Planning Services ............... ............................... 34 Engineering Services ............. ............................... 37 Building Safety Services .......... ............................... 39 Fire Services ................... ............................... 40 Administrative Services ........... ............................... 42 Summary of Personal Choice Public Services ......................... 43 Result of Adoption .......... ............................... 43 Taxpayer Equity Achieved .... ............................... 43 A Master Fee Resolution .......... ............................... 43 Policy Regarding "New" Services .... ............................... 43 Conclusion ..................... ............................... 44 CHAPTER VI ........................ ............................... 45 ACTIONPLAN ....................... ............................... 45 Internal Support Services .......... ............................... 45 Public Services ................. ............................... 45 Personal Choice Public Services .... ............................... 46 Community- Supported Public Services .............................. 46 Summary...................... ............................... 47 APPENDIX A - PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICE DETAIL APPENDIX B - BUILDING SAFETY DETAILED FEE RECOMMENDATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. The cumulative effect of the three taxpayer initiatives, Propositions 13,4 & 218, has been to significantly change California local government finance. In order for cities to provide basic services, it is necessary to cut -back on the taxes used for non -basic services and to explore ways to make all services as efficient and effective as possible. This report provides information which the City Council, staff and citizens of El Segundo can use in this process. B. The City is currently using about $2.2 Million in taxes to support PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES' that could or should be supported by their fees. To make the determination that there has not been an unintentional subsidy, the City Council should review each subsidized service in Appendix A so that it can make a finding that there is a social welfare, public safety or other reason to continue the subsidy. C. Being supported by fees merely means that the cost of the service is "in -line" with the fee charged for the service. Raising the fee is only one way to bring the two into line. The cost may be reduced. The service may be discontinued. A non -user may wish to support the service for the recognition. The real issue to be addressed is whether there is a reason for the City Council to have the general taxpayer subsidize a particular service for a "personal choice" user. D. In addition to the current costs that are identified by this Report, the City is incurring an obligation to maintain or replace its infrastructure. The implementation of GASB 34 has identified many millions more in annual costs that should be added to the City's tax services. See Chapter IV for an explanation of the term "Personal Choice" and how it differs from "Fee Service." CHAPTER I BACKGROUND To fully understand this Report and its suggestions for local government financial management, it is necessary for the reader to understand the reasons why local government financial management has changed over the last twenty -five years. This Report would not exist today without the taxpayer rebellion begun in 1978 by Howard Jarvis. Prior to that date, city councils had the ability to set the local property tax rate. There was no pressure on management to operate more efficiently as the "well was full." When asked to pay for a service, taxpayers could legitimately say that they paid taxes to cover that service. Beginning in the mid - sixties, property values in the large urban areas of California began annual double -digit increases. This was a windfall to local governments as they were getting annual double -digit increases in property tax revenue without the stigma of having raised the rate. Although some local governments acted responsibly by lowering their tax rate, most did not. The significant annual tax increases were noticed by everyone, but it was Howard Jarvis who focused the resentment into a movement and, almost single - handed, pushed through the voter adoption of Proposition 13. Proposition 13 The proposition, which became Article XIIIA of the State Constitution, established a limit on the growth of the property tax. But, more importantly, it empowered voters who did not like the direction that local government was taking. Unfortunately, there is still no consensus on what that direction should be. Proposition 4 After the passage of Proposition 13, the California Taxpayers Association, the California Chamber of Commerce, the National Tax Limitation Committee and the California Association of Realtors banded together, contributed money, hired constitutional attorneys to draft a more thorough proposition, and hired Paul Gann, who was an associate of Howard Jarvis, to be the proposition's spokesperson. The result was Proposition 4, which is more commonly referred to as the "Gann Spirit of 13 'Let's Finish the Job' Initiative ". It was adopted by 74.3% of the voters of California on November 6, 1979, and became 3 City of E/ Segundo Cost of Services Study effective on July 1, 1980, retroactive to Fiscal Year 1978 -79. This proposition, which became Article XIIIB of the State Constitution, had a more significant fiscal impact than Prop. 13 as it addressed all city revenues and established a limit on the growth of tax revenues. Because of Proposition 4, fee services cannot exceed the "costs reasonably borne" by the City in providing the service. If the fee exceeds the cost, the excess fee is defined to be a special tax which Proposition 13 requires be approved by two- thirds of the voters. Proposition 218 This proposition, which is now Articles XIIIC & D, was adopted in November of 1996. The immediate impact of this proposition was to limit the use of assessment districts and restrict transfers of monies into the general fund from utility funds2. However, the long term effect may be to make local government legislative bodies irrelevant, as all of its tax and fee decisions can be overruled by the voters. Underlying Report Goal A major underlying goal of this Report is to provide information and guidance to the City Council on how the City can continue as a viable financial entity, finance the services and facilities that its citizens and business enterprises have come to expect, and yet in the long run be able to live within the limits imposed by voter - adopted Articles XIIIA, B, C & D. This is a watershed period for California local government. The voters are on a track which could ultimately result in either the destruction of local government or its reconstruction as a paragon of efficiency and effectiveness which is in harmony with the voters. This Report takes the position that the latter track can only be achieved by improved information on what government does and how it does it. Consequently, it is one more tool that the City Council and staff can use in the continuing process of communication with the public. Study Phases To accomplish our goal, the work encompassed by this Report involved four basic phases, which are discussed in the following Chapters: Under Article XIII D, local government fees and charges must reasonably represent the cost of providing a service (Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association at al., v. City of Roseville, Case No. C036295, Cal.App. V, April 12, 2002). Roseville's "in -lieu franchise fee" of 4% on each utility was not tied to the City's cost of providing services to the utilities. S1 61, I r:: _. Chapter l - P 1. Identify, fully cost, and allocate the INTERNAL SUPPORT SERVICES that are provided to the rest of the organization. The result of this phase is the division of all City activities into two service groups. The first group is comprised of activities, the INTERNAL SUPPORT SERVICES, that exist to support the second group. The second group is comprised of activities, PUBLIC SERVICES, which provide services to either the community as a whole or to individuals. Examples of INTERNAL SUPPORT SERVICES are: the City Council, the City Manager, the City Clerk, Finance and the City Attorney. �`"� %"'� 2. Identify and fully cost the hours in the departments providing PUBLIC SERVICES. This phase will show how staff positions can be thought of as time resources for the City. How each unit of time can be fully costed and assigned to a particular service which is provided to the public. The result of this phase is the FULLY - BURDENED HOURLY RATE for staff positions providing PUBLIC SERVICES. 3. Identify all City- provided PUBLIC SERVICES and categorize them into two major subgroups: (a) services that are provided to the public at large where there is presently no practical way to measure the consumption of the service (COMMUNITY- SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICES); and, (b) services that are provided, or could be provided, for a fee subject to the City Council's desire to fully or partially subsidize it for social, safety or welfare reasons (PERSONAL- CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES). This phase (Chapter IV) will also discuss the difficulty in categorizing some services as either "community" or "personal" and will offer some techniques that could be used to distinguish between the two groups. 4. Fully cost the PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES and present the results so that the City staff, the City Council and the public are aware of the source of monies used to support each service and can make reasoned decisions whether the service or certain service recipients should be subsidized by the taxes paid by the entire community. Terminology The above section uses the term, PERSONAL CHOICE, to define services where others might use the term, FEE SERVICES. As more fully discussed in Chapter IV, the distinction is that the City Council decides whether a service is paid for by taxes or charged to the user as a FEE SERVICE. If a city were to have sufficient tax revenues, there could potentially be no fee services. The term, PERSONAL CHOICE, is used to distinguish a 5 City of E/ Segundo Cost of Services Study service received by an identifiable person or group from services that are used by the community as a whole. It might be argued that the City requires a permit, for example, and that the user has no choice. However, the permit applicant is doing something unique that every other resident in the City is not doing and so, the question becomes - should everyone in the City contribute part of their tax dollars to subsidize the service received by this unique individual? Fortunately, we elect city councils to make these tough decisions. 0 CHAPTER II INTERNAL, SUPPORT SERVICES INTERNAL SUPPORT SERVICES are the vital glue that holds an organization together so that the staff is not a loose, uncoordinated confederation of expensive parts. It is also referred to as "overhead ", "administration" or "indirect cost ". At one extreme, the services provide the coordinative and analytical capability necessary to research and respond to City policy and operational issues, and then to execute those policies quickly and to report the results accurately. At the other extreme, the services provide the day -to -day equipment or facilities required for the rest of the organization to function effectively. The purpose of this Chapter is to show how these services were identified, fully - costed and allocated to the remainder of the City organization. The technique used by RCS to achieve this purpose is referred to as a "cost allocation plan" or CAP, for short. This chapter will include several schedules from the complete Plan which has been provided to the City in a separate volume. Cost Allocation Plans - Historical Perspective Federal Government Creates the Process. During the 1960's when the federal government was sharing increasing amounts of revenue with local governments, the local concern was that the grants were impacting administrative departments without the grant compensating the local agency for this impact. Consequently, the federal government established a process that local agencies could use to compute this impact and which the federal government would accept for overhead reimbursement. This process was called a Cost Allocation Plan and is identified with the various reference numbers that it has received over the years: A -87, OASCA 0 and FMC 74 -4. Gann Initiative Institutionalizes Overhead for Services. Even though the federal government recognized the overhead costs of grant programs, the on -going overhead for regular operations was not widely computed by local governments until California voters adopted Proposition 4, the Gann Initiative, in November of 1979. This proposition (Article XII1B) states that overhead and administration are part of the "costs reasonably borne" in charging for a service. This distinction was necessary because a fee in excess of the "costs reasonably borne" is considered to be a tax and to require a two- thirds vote to be legitimate according to the Jarvis Initiative (Proposition 13, State Constitution Article XIIIA). 7 City of El Segundo Cost of Services Study Types of INTERNAL SUPPORT SERVICES Two types of INTERNAL SUPPORT SERVICES are in use by El Segundo: General City Overhead Departmental Administration Each is now discussed in its turn. General City Overhead Costs in this category would be for the general administration of the City, such as the following: City Council City Treasurer City Manager City Clerk City Attorney Finance Information Systems Personnel Government Buildings Equipment Maintenance Each service is very important to the smooth functioning of the City. But, their primary function is to support other departments and not to provide an end -user service to the public. Where they do perform an end -user service, the cost related to that service has been removed from the costs allocated to other departments. Departmental Administration This group can be as simple as part of the time of the department head and departmental secretary to division managers. Again, the purpose of these services is to insure the smooth functioning of the department and not to provide an end -user service to the public. Some of these costs were allocated through the CAP. In other cases, a percentage overhead was calculated for the department or division and then added to the CAP costs to establish the total overhead for a departmental position. Departmental overhead will also be discussed in the next chapter. Chapter 11- Internal Support Services Cost Allocation Plan Methodology RCS took the following steps to allocate the above numerated internal services to all other services through the Cost Allocation Plan: 1. Calculated the Costs for each internal service 2. Identified departments receiving each internal service 3. Selected a method for allocating the costs ( #1) to other departments ( #2) 4. Reviewed the Allocations for Reasonableness Internal Service Costs The result of allocating the City Overhead is found on the following Schedule 1. 40� - -/ This schedule is also found as TAB 1 in the Full Cost Allocation Plan which has been provided to the City as a separate Report. 0 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO SCHEDULE A Final Allocation Summary Report Total FY 2007 -2008 Schedule 1 Page 1 of 4 Suborg # Suborg Name Final Allocation 001 - 1000 -1301 CITY CLERK $618.09 001 - 2000 -2101 CITY MANAGER $72,716.66 001 - 2000 -2504 BUSINESS SERVICES $220,033.88 001 - 2000 -2505 INFORMATION SYST. $2,689.70 001 - 2000 -6601 COMMUNITY CABLE $180,980.26 001 - 2400 -2402 PLANNING $417,923.94 001 - 2400 -2403 BUILDING SAFETY $420,406.82 001 - 2600 -4101 ENGINEERING $300,987.83 001 - 2600 -4201 STREET SERVICES $140,894.12 001 - 2600 -4202 STREET MAINTENANCE $303,540.31 001 - 2600 -4205 PW TRAFFIC SAFETY $125,374.99 001 - 2600 -4206 SOLID WASTE RECYCLING $185,016.41 001 - 26004302 STORM DRAINS $78,272.97 001 - 2600 -4801 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN $2,057.96 001 - 3100 -3101 POLICE ADMIN. $1,196,227.42 001 - 3100 -3102 PATROL & SAFETY SERVICES $959,587.34 001 - 3100 -3103 CRIME INVESTIGATION $288,765.23 001 - 3100 -3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY $146,842.29 001 - 3100 -3106 POLICE COMM REL $17,457.93 001 - 3100 -3107 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS $269,542.56 001 - 3100 -3108 ANIMAL CONTROL $21,970.13 001 - 3200 -3201 FIRE ADMINISTRATION $79,588.94 001 - 3200 -3202 FIRE SUPPRESSION $1,277,390.49 1 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO SCHEDULE A Final Allocation Summary Report - Total FY 2007 -2008 Schedule 1 Page 2 of 4 Suborg # Suborg Name Final Allocation 001 - 3200 -3203 FIRE PARAMEDIC $335,490.85 001- 3200 -3204 FIRE PREVENTION $70,493.70 001 - 3200 -3205 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY $57,771.67 001 - 3200 -3255 FIRE EMERGENCY SERVICES $112,169.17 001 - 5000 -5101 RECREATION & PARKS ADMIN $98,807.57 001 - 5000 -5102 PARKS OPERATIONS $448,339.14 001 - 5000 -5201 RECREATION OPERATIONS $206,912.54 001 - 5000 -5202 AQUATICS $127,988.08 001 - 5000 -5203 CULTURAL ARTS $30,758.51 001 - 5000 -5204 SPORTS $27,529.90 001 - 5000 -5205 TEEN CENTER $76,967.04 001 - 5000 -5206 JOSLYN SENIOR CENTER $76,266.09 001 - 5000 -5208 FARMERS MARKET $5,230.88 001 -5000 -5209 CONTRACT CLASSES $30,773.51 001 - 5000 -5210 SPECIAL EVENTS $10,519.96 001 - 5000 -5212 RECREATION TRIPS $481.50 001 - 5000 -6101 LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION $464,240.58 001 - 5000 -6102 LIBRARY SUPPORT SERVICES $81,889.58 001 - 5000 -6103 LIBRARY YOUTH SERVICES $81,342.68 001 - 5000 -6104 LIBRARY PUBLIC /INFO SERVICES $73,320.07 104- 3100 -3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT $8,637.72 106 - 2600 -0000 STATE GAS TAX $11,873.54 109 - 3100 -3105 ASSET FORFEITURE $126,844.26 111 - 2400 -2743 CDBG SENIOR IN -HOME CARE $1,229.09 2 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO !Final Allocation Summary Report - Total FY 2007 -2008 SCHEDULE A Schedule 1 Page 3 of 4 Suborg # Suborg Name Final Allocation 111 - 2400 -2747 CDBG JUVENILE DIVERSION $795.94 111- 2400 -2748 CDBG MINOR HOME REPAIR $2,102.93 '111- 2400 -2778 CDBG DELIVERED MEALS $1,843.70 111- 2400 -2779 CDBG GENERAL ADMIN $1,112.52 111- 2400 -2781 CDBG ADA CONCRETE RAMPS $1,005.01 112- 5000 -5292 PROP A DIAL -A -RIDE $155,288.59 112 - 5000 -5293 PROP A SHUTTLE $3,589.00 112 - 5000 -5294 PROP A RECREATION TRIPS $1,878.53 112- 5000 -5295 PROP A ADMINISTRATION $46,947.42 112 - 5000 -5297 PROP A MTA BUY -DOWN $442.62 112 - 5000 -5298 PROP A CTIP /MAX $1,688.43 1.14- 5000 -5292 PROP C DIAL -A -RIDE $668.51 114 - 5000 -5293 PROP C SHUTTLE $12,689.99 114- 5000 -5295 PROP C ADMINISTRATION $49,230.90 115 - 2400 -0000 AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION $3,051.88 116 - 2400 -0000 RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION $127,079.31 117 - 2400 -8601 HYPERION MITIGATION $17,086.75 120 - 3100 -0000 COPS /SLESF GRANT $18,911.17 202 - 2000 -0000 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #73 $2,288.66 301 - 0000 -0000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND $73,601.83 405 - 2600 -0000 FACILITIES MAINT FUND $14,422.26 501 - 2600 -7102 WATER OPERATIONS $519,134.26 502 - 2600 -4301 WASTEWATER $272,102.38 503 - 5000 -5301 GOLF COURSE ADMIN $24,701.68 503 - 5000 -5302 GOLF FOOD AND BEVERAGE $19,581.13 503 - 5000 -5304 GOLF PRO SHOP $16,527.99 3 July 18, 2008 A CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Final Allocation Summary Report - Total FY 20072008 Suborg # Suborg Name 503 - 5000 -5305 GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE 503 - 5000 -5306 GOLF DRIVING RAGE 503 - 5000 -5307 GOLF GENERAL & ADMIN 503 - 5000 -5308 GOLF LESSONS SCHEDULE A Schedule 1 Page 4 of 4 Finai Allocation $23,655.15 $5,917.21 $34,381.77 $2,138.35 $10,728,629.77 0 4 July 18. 2008 r. City of B Segundo Cost of Services Study Allocation Factors Going from the cost of general overhead to the costs allocated to end -user departments and divisions was accomplished by using an overhead allocation factor. Each factor was related to the work effort of its particular overhead element. The ratio of the factor specific to each end -user department to the total of the factors for all departments became the ratio for allocating each overhead element. These factors are described on the following Schedule 2. 14 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO SCHEDULE C Summary of Allocation Factors FY 2007 -2008 Schedule 2 Page 1 of 4 CITY COUNCIL CAP -001 CITY COUNCIL SERVICES 50 %-# OF AGENDA ITEMS /50 % -% OF BUDGET CITY TREASURER CAP -005 TREASURER SERVICES CITY CLERK CAP -010 CAP -011 CAP-011A CAP -012 CAP -013 CAP -014 CITY COUNCIL SUPPORT CONTRACT PROCESSING BID PROCESSING ELECTIONS SUPPORT GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS DEPARTMENT SUPPORT ELECTIONS CAP -015 ELECTION SERVICES CITY MANAGER CAP -020 CITY COUNCIL SUPPORT CAP -021 CITY ADMINISTRATION CAP -022 INFO SERVICES SUPPORT CAP -023 CABLE TV SUPPORT CAP -024 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CASH BALANCE - 9/30/07 ALLOCATE TO CITY COUNCIL # OF CONTRACTS # OF BIDS ALLOCATE TO ELECTIONS ADJUSTED BUDGET ADJUSTED BUDGET (PUB SAF ADMIN ONLY) ALLOCATE TO CITY COUNCIL ALLOCATE TO CITY COUNCIL ADJUSTED BUDGET ALLOCATE TO INFORMATION SYSTEMS ALLOCATE TO COMMUNITY CABLE ADJUSTED BUDGET 1 July 18, 2008 CITY ATTORNEY CAP -030 CAP -031 CAP -032 CAP -033 CAP -034 CAP -034A CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Summary of Allocation Factors FY 2007 -2008 CITY COUNCIL LEGAL SVCS CONTRACT LEGAL SVCS HUMAN RES. LEGAL SVCS LABOR NEGOT. LEGAL SVCS LIABILITY LEGAL SERVICES CODE ENFORCE LEGAL SVCS FINANCE ADMINISTRATION CAP -035 CITY ADMINISTRATION CAP -036 BUDGET PREP /COORD CAP -037 TREASURY SERVICES CAP -038 GENERAL LIABILITY SUPPORT CAP -039 FINANCE DEPT ADMIN FINANCE ACCOUNTING SERVICES CAP -040 GENERAL ACCOUNTING CAP -041 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CAP -042 PROP A SUPPORT CAP -043 PROP C SUPPORT CAP -044 BUDGET PREP /COORD SCHEDULE C Schedule 2 Page 2 of 4 ALLOCATE TO CITY COUNCIL # OF CONTRACTS # OF FULL TIME EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES # OF REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES ADJUSTED BUDGET ALLOCATE TO PLANNING ADJUSTED BUDGET ADJUSTED BUDGET CASH BALANCE - 9/30/07 ADJUSTED BUDGET # OF FINANCE FTE'S ADJUSTED BUDGET # OF INVOICE TRANSACTIONS ALLOCATE TO PROP A ALLOCATE TO PROP C ADJUSTED BUDGET 2 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Summary of Allocation Factors FY 2007 -2008 INFORMATION SYST. CAP -050 PC USER SUPPORT CAP -051 NETWORK SUPP /IS PROJECTS CAP -052 GIS SERVICES CAP -053 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SUPP CAP -054 INFO SYSTEMS ADMIN HUMAN RESOURCES CAP -060 RECRUIT SELECT & STAFF CAP -061 EMPLOYEE /EMPLOYER REL. CAP -062 LABOR CONTRACT NEGOTIATE CAP -063 WORKERS COMP /SAFETY CAP -064 CITY RECEPTION SERVICES CAP -065 HUMAN RESOURCES ADMIN FINANCE FISCAL SERVICES CAP -070 PURCHASING SERVICES CAP -071 BENEFIT ADMINISTRATION CAP -072 BUDGET PREP /COORD CAP -073 PAYROLL SERVICES CAP -074 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS CAP -075 CONTRACT PROCESSING CAP -076 GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN SCHEDULE C Schedule 2 Page 3 of 4 # OF NETWORK CONNECTIONS (POLICE ADJ) # OF NETWORK CONNECTIONS ESTIMATE OF GIS USAGE # OF NETWORK CONNECTIONS ALLOCATE TO INFO SYSTEMS # OF RECUITMENTS - 3 YEARS # OF FULL TIME EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES # OF REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES WORKERS COMP CHARGES # OF FULL TIME EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES ALLOCATE TO HUMAN RESOURCES # OF PURCHASE ORDERS # OF BENEFITTED EMPLOYEES ADJUSTED BUDGET # OF PAYCHECKS - 1 PAY PERIOD ADJUSTED BUDGET # OF CONTRACTS ADJUSTED BUDGET 3 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Summary of Allocation Factors FY 2007 -2008 ANON- DEPARTMENTAL CAP -080 NON - DEPARTMENTAL CAP -081 CITY HALL DEBT SERVICE CAP -082 GEN. FUND LIABILITY EXP CAP -083 RETIREE BENEFITS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS CAP -100 BUILDING MAINTENANCE CAP -101 CITY HALL CUSTODIAL CAP -102 POLICE CUSTODIAL CAP -103 FIRE ADMIN CUSTODIAL CAP -104 CITY YARD CUSTODIAL CAP -105 WATER YARD CUSTODIAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CAP -110 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CAP -111 EQUIPMENT FUEL COSTS CAP -112 EQUIPMENT PARTS /SERVICES CAP -113 GOVERNMENT BLDGS SUPPORT CAP -114 STREET SERVICES SUPPORT CAP -115 SOLID WASTE SUPPORT PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CAP -120 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SCHEDULE C Schedule 2 Page 4 of 4 ADJUSTED BUDGET CITY HALL SQUARE FOOTAGE GENERAL FUND ADJUSTED BUDGET # OF BENEFITTED EMPLOYEES SQUAREFOOTAGE CITY HALL SQUARE FOOTAGE POLICE SQUARE FOOTAGE # OF FIRE ADMIN /PREY FTE'S ALLOCATION OF SPACE USED ALLOCATE TO WATER LABOR COSTS FUEL COSTS PARTS /SUBLET COSTS ALLOCATE TO GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS ALLOCATE TO STREET SERVICES ALLOCATE TO SOLID WASTE # OF PUBLIC WORKS FTE'S 4 Ally 18, 2008 Chapter 11- Infernal Support Services Summary of Internal Support Services At the conclusion of this process, all INTERNAL SUPPORT SERVICES allocated through the Cost Allocation Plan have been assigned to departments and activities providing PUBLIC SERVICES. These costs will appear as an element of the fully - burdened hourly rates (Chapter III) or as a "specific" charge to a service (also discussed in Chapter III). 19 City of El Segundo Cost of Services Study (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK) 20 CHAPTER III FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATES All labor for hire in the private sector is based on a flat hourly rate. For example, a plumber who is fixing a sink for a homeowner may quote an hourly rate of $70. As consumers, we understand that the plumber is not making $70 an hour but that all of the costs associated with his /her trip to the homeowner are factored into that rate. This chapter shows how RCS has calculated a similar hourly rate for staff that provide PUBLIC SERVICES. Costs Recognized by Proposition 4 In Chapter I, it was mentioned that the authors of Proposition 4 included the California Association of Realtors and the California Chamber of Commerce; in effect, the pillars of business. Therefore, it is not surprising that they recommended a business - oriented approach to the costs of governmental services. For example: "The phrase `costs reasonably borne by such entity in providing the regulation, product, or service' is intended to incorporate all appropriations by an entity for reasonable costs appropriate for the continuation of the service over time. This includes ongoing expenses such as operation costs and a reasonable allocation for overhead and administration, but it also includes reasonable allocation for start-up costs and future capacity. Thus, reasonable allocations for capital replacement, expansion of services, and repayment of related bond issuances would be considered `costs reasonably borne'."' Cost Elements in the Fully- Burdened Hourly Rate The fully- burdened hourly rate (FBHR) for a position which provides PUBLIC SERVICES is comprised of the following elements: - Salary - Benefits ' "Summary of Proposed Implementing Legislation and Drafter's Intent with Regard to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (Proposition 4, November 6, 1979) "; Spirit of 13, Inc.; 1980; California Chamber of Commerce; page 6. 21 City of E/ Segundo Cost of Services Study and a proportionate share of the activity's "general ": Operating Expenses - Overhead Expenses When these costs are added together for a position, the result is the total cost of that position to the City. The fully- burdened hourly rate for that position is calculated by taking the total cost of the position and dividing it by the number of hours that the position is available for work (i.e. "the available- work - hours "). Salary This includes the annual salary of the position. If there are multiple people with the same position title, then this includes their total salary so that the cost of individuals at different pay steps is averaged over all people with the same title. The salary cost should also include any benefit that is unique to that position such as a car allowance unless that benefit is included with the other benefits. Benefits There are three categories of employee benefits: hour, dollar and percentage. The hour benefits are discussed under the topic of "available work hours." Dollar benefits refer to any benefit where the cost is a flat amount irrespective of the employee's salary. Examples of dollar benefits are: Group Medical Insurance Percentage benefits refer to benefits where the cost is determined by multiplying the employee's salary by a percentage rate. Examples of percentage benefits are: Retirement Contribution Medicare Workers' Compensation Insurance Social Security 22 Chapter /// - Fully- Burdened Hourly Rates Employee Benefit Groups The following Schedule 3 lists the various groupings of employees for which a unique fringe benefit rate was calculated. Schedule 3 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FRINGE BENEFIT RATES FISCAL YEAR 2007 -2008 "General" versus "Specific" Costs Specific costs are "driven" by a specific PUBLIC SERVICE. Consequently, specific costs should be allocated directly to the service rather than included as an element of the FBHR. To include specific costs in the hourly rate would result in those costs being spread to all work performed by those staff positions so that the cost of the specific service would be understated and all other services by those positions would be overstated. Examples of specific costs are: 1. Contracted plan check service for a particular permit application. 2. Advertising the public hearing of a planning application. 3. Special maintenance expenditures for a particular building or facility. Once the specific costs have been allocated directly to the appropriate PUBLIC SERVICE, the costs which remain are "general" costs and necessary for the associated positions to function properly. These costs are included in the FBHR of those positions. 23 BENEFIT AVAIL. EMPLOYEE GROUP RATE WK -HRS CLERICAL 28.15% 1,668 OTHER 30.94% 1,668 MANUAL 34.99% 1,668 POLICE 49.79% 1,668 FIRE (SHIFT) 48.64% 2,556 FIRE (40 HOURS/WEEK) 48.64% 1,668 PART TIME BENEFITTED 28.15% 1,000 PART TIME NON - BENEFITTED 8.46% 1,000 "General" versus "Specific" Costs Specific costs are "driven" by a specific PUBLIC SERVICE. Consequently, specific costs should be allocated directly to the service rather than included as an element of the FBHR. To include specific costs in the hourly rate would result in those costs being spread to all work performed by those staff positions so that the cost of the specific service would be understated and all other services by those positions would be overstated. Examples of specific costs are: 1. Contracted plan check service for a particular permit application. 2. Advertising the public hearing of a planning application. 3. Special maintenance expenditures for a particular building or facility. Once the specific costs have been allocated directly to the appropriate PUBLIC SERVICE, the costs which remain are "general" costs and necessary for the associated positions to function properly. These costs are included in the FBHR of those positions. 23 City of El Segundo Cost of Services Study Operating Expenses The general operating expenses for a particular department/activity are spread to the FBHR in the same ratio as the general operating expenses are to the total salaries for that particular department/activity. Overhead Expenses General overhead expenses are spread similar to general operating expenses and are derived from the calculation of INTERNAL SUPPORT SERVICE costs discussed in Chapter II plus any divisional overhead percentage. Available Work -Hours After computing the individual elements of cost for positions in a department/division /activity providing PUBLIC SERVICES, the total cost for each position is divided by the total number of available work -hours for that position. In order to compute the number of available work - hours, RCS started with the total possible work -hours in a yearwhich is 2,080 hours. From this possible total, RCS subtracts hours for the following benefits: Holidays % ! A-1- Vacations Sick Leave Morning /Afternoon Breaks Start Up /Down Time Ththours that remain are referred to as the available work - hours. No consideration is given to the possibility of "slack" or "idle" time because those hours can be controlled by the department/activity manager. The average number of available work -hours used for the various employee groups was shown on Schedule 3 above. Results of Knowing the Fully- Burdened Hourly Rate (FBHR) The following are possible results of knowing the FBHR of employees: Knowing the hourly cost of an employee will cause a good manager to think of dollars when monitoring the activity (or inactivity) of an employee. 24 Chapter 111 - Fully- Burdened Hourly Rates Knowing the cost of participants should make those who call meetings aware of their cost. How often do thousand dollar meetings resolve hundred dollar issues? Those who routinely arrive late to meetings, keeping others from starting the meeting on time, can know the cost to the organization of their tardiness. Those who talk to customers on the phone or at the counter can measure the cost of the conversation that went beyond the necessary communication of information. These examples are only a small number of possible results and some may not even apply to the City of El Segundo. Summary In this Chapter, Internal Service Costs developed in Chapter II were added to the other elements of the personnel costs to develop a fully- burdened hourly rate (FBHR) for each staff position that is providing PUBLIC SERVICES. In the next Chapter, RCS will more fully define the PUBLIC SERVICES and set the stage for calculating their cost by using the FBHR developed here. P41 City of El Segundo Cost of Services Study (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK) NIV CHAPTER IV PUBLIC SERVICES m OVERVIEW For this Report the City's PUBLIC SERVICES are separated into two groups: COMMUNITY - SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICES PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES Public Services What is a tax service? There is the simple definition — "A tax service is anything that the City does that I paid my taxes for." More complicated, academic definitions refer to the social contract and how these services cannot be measured and that we all use them, etc. The pragmatic definition of a tax service is: "Anything that the City Council decides to support by taxes as long as tax revenues are available." Once this fact is realized, there are no "true" tax services, only services that individual city councils have decided to support with taxes. In other words, what is a tax service is "backed into" once the amount of tax revenues are determined. This makes more sense when we realize how easy it would be to charge for some of the traditional tax services: Police Service. More dollars are spent on private security services than on all public police departments .4 If people are willing to spend their money on "private" police, how would they feel if we gave them some of their taxes back and asked the public to contract with us for a specific level of service? Cities that contract with the Sheriff do exactly that. They contract for specific staffing levels to address specific community concerns. Fire Service. There are already fire companies in rural areas that contract with property owners for fire suppression. If you haven't subscribed for the service, they will merely insure that your fire doesn't spread to neighbors who have subscribed. "Welcome to the New World of Private Security," Economist, April 19, 1997. 27 City of El Segundo Cost of Services Study Park Services. Open space is usually considered to be "free" but once improvements are made it is only a matter of degree or time until the user is charged. The improvement could merely be providing rescue service to the weekend hiker /climber. RCS is not suggesting that the City charge for the above services but is merely trying to illustrate that it is a political decision (probably based on custom or habit) to support a service, or at least a certain service level, with taxes. Given these problems with defining what is a "tax service ", it makes more sense to discuss these services in the context of being COMMUNITY- SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICES which are 100% supported by taxes. The reference to 100% is to exclude from COMMUNITY - SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICES any PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES that are partially tax subsidized. This is because, as we will see below, the issues change when a service is only partially tax supported. Personal Choice Public Services PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES are defined as services where the customer is identifiable and the service is measurable and can be withheld for non - payment. These services are not referred to as fee services because the City Council may have made a decision to totally subsidize the service_ What distinguishes these services from COMMUNITY - SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICES is the implicit requirement that there be a rationale for subsidizing some of these services but not others. Or, for subsidizing some customer groups but not other customer groups. Typically the rationale is that there is a social, safety or welfare reason to subsidize. Proposition 4 was the voter initiative that was most concerned about fee services. The initiative authors were not concerned what services were subsidized as long as the subsidy was an explicit decision of the City Council based on knowing the full cost of the service. Distinguishing Between Community - Supported & Personal Choice Public Services If one or more of these questions can be answered, "Yes ", for a service, then it has some of the characteristics of a PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICE: If the service were discontinued, would less that half of the City's population complain? 2. If the users of a particular service were told that they all had to consume the same amount of the service, would more than half of the City's population complain? Chapter IV - Public Services - Overview 3. If it was a choice between reducing the level of two services or charging for one of them, would more that half of the City's population agree on which service to establish a charge? Summary In this chapter, we discussed how PUBLIC SERVICES can be separated into COMMUNITY- SUPPORTED and PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES. In the next chapter, we discuss in detail the results of fully costing the PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES. 29 City of El Segundo Cost of Services Study (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK) 30 CHAPTER V PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES The purpose of this Chapter is to present the services which RCS has initially labeled as PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES and to suggest the magnitude of tax revenues that could be diverted from these services to COMMUNITY- SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICES. City Council has Final Judgment. It must be understood that considerable judgment -- albeit experienced - -was exercised by RCS in suggesting what services were PERSONAL CHOICE as opposed to COMMUNITY- SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICES and in suggesting that most PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES should be paid for by the service requestor rather than subsidized by the entire community. However, the final decision on the nature of the service and whether it deserves to be subsidized will have to be made by the City Council. Service Groups RCS has organized PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES into the following five service groups for purposes of discussion: Planning Services Engineering Services Building Safety Services Fire Services Administrative Services These groups, explained in turn, are program oriented. Each group includes a table summarizing the revenues and costs of each service. A Table summarizing the group tables (Table 6) is found at the end of this Chapter. Service Center Detail Found in Appendix A Appendix A, which is in sequence by the Reference Number (Column 1 on each of the following Tables), includes detail information for each service on two facing pages. The left page has textual and summary information including RCS's suggested service fee. The right page has the service cost detail. 31 City of El Segundo Cost of Services Study General Commentary on Chapter Tables Each table has eight columns, explained here: Column 1 is the Report Reference Number. Column 2 is the title of the service. Column 3.4 & 5 are the same amounts for revenue, cost and profit (subsidy) found on the left page of the detail service sheets in Appendix A. Column 6 is the current percentage of costs recovered from the user fees and charges with the difference being subsidized by taxes. Column 7 is the percentage of user fee cost recovery which might be obtainable without tax subsidy. Of course, decisions regarding tax subsidies to a service is a City Council policy decision on how to allocate its tax and general revenues. Column 8 contains the estimated amount of revenues which RCS suggests could be raised or reduced. Suggestions For Services Analyzed It is suggested that the City Council review each of the services in this Chapter for the following reasons: 1. To confirm or negate the decision that the service is a PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICE. 2. To insure that any service which has been and which will continue to be subsidized meets the purpose (e.g. Social Goal) and reporting criteria established by the City Council. 3. Where services have been unconsciously subsidized, to direct staff to bring costs into line with the revenue generated by such service. 32 Chapter V - Personal Choice Public Services Special Circumstance When a service is marked with a double asterisk-M, the consumer is anticipated to respond to governmental services like he /she does to private services: marginal users will be "priced out" until the resulting volume of service provided is in equilibrium to the demand at the revised price. The City Council will have to decide if such private pricing methodology is appropriate and, if so, to what extent. However, it must be remembered that to the extent market forces do not prevail, the general taxpayers will make up the difference with their taxes. Therefore the revenue will not be as high as a service that did not have these issues. When a service is marked with a pound sign ( #), it occurs infrequently; and, therefore, RCS does not project any possible new revenue for the service. 33 City of El Segundo Cost of Services Study Planning Services When basic City planning services are supported by general taxes, there is little reason for taxes to also finance those PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES which mainly benefit a developer or specific property owner. Thus, the expenses distributed across these service centers are primarily the incremental additional expenses caused by community development. Were no development to take place, most of these costs could be eliminated, or at least significantly reduced. Table 1 Planning Services 34 Possible Profit Percent Recovery New Ref # Service Title Revenue Cost (Subsidy) Current Suggest Revenue (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) S -001 ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT $4,000 $26,768 $(22,768) 14.9% 100.0% $22,800 S -002 MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $1,350 $6,692 $(5,342) 20.2% 100.0% $5,300 S-003 MAJOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $3,740 $27,429 $(23,689) 13.6% 100.0% $23,700 S -004 ARCHITECTURAUDESIGN REVIEW $0 $10,774 $(10,774) 0.0% 100.0% $10,800 S -005 VARIANCE REVIEW $2,805 $20,572 $(17,767) 13.6% 100.0% $17,800 S -006 ADJUSTMENT REVIEW $1,040 $5,142 $(4,102) 20.2% 100.0% $4,100 S -007 ZONE TEXT AMEND /ZONE CHANGE NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -008 PRE- APPLICATION REVIEW $3,100 $68,187 $(65,087) 4.5% 100.0% $16,275 S -009 TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -010 OFF -SITE PARKING COVENANT $705 $1,808 $(1,103) 39.0% 100.0% $1,100 S -011 PARK DEMAND /SHARE PARK STDY $465 $9,862 $(9,397) 4.7% 100.0% $9,400 S -012 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REV NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -013 SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -014 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT REV NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -015 SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AMEND NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -016 ANNEXATION REQUEST REVIEW NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -017 CFD ANNEXATION REQUEST REV NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -018 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REV NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -019 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT $385 $766 $(381) 50.3% 100.0% $0 P S -020 PLANNED RESID. DEVELOP REV NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -021 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS $7,400 $7,400 $0 100.0% 100.0% $0 S -022 SMOKY HOLLOW FLOATING ZONE NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -023 SMOKY HOLLOW SITE PLAN $6,860 $20,717 $(13,857) 33.1% 100.0% $13,900 S-024 DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT REV NA NA NA NA 100.00/- $0 S -025 ENVIRON. CATEGORICAL EXEMPT $3,330 $11,775 $(8,445) 28.3% 100.0% $8,400 S -026 ENV INIT STUDY /NEG DEC /RECIR $5,610 $21,281 $(15,671) 26.4% 100.0% $15,700 S -027 ENVIRON IMPACT REPORT REVIEW NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -028 MITIGATION MONITORING $0 $4,650 $(4,650) 0.0% 100.0% $4,700 S -029 PRECISE PLAN MODIFICATION REV NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 34 Ref # (1) Service Title (2) S -030 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP REVIEW S -031 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP REVIEW S -032 VESTING TENT TRACT MAp REV S -033 RESUBMITTED MAP REVIEW S -034 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT S -035 LOT MERGER S -036 REVERSION TO ACREAGE S -037 CERTIF OF COMPLIANCE REVIEW S -038 RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT S -039 CC &R REVIEW S -040 HISTORIC RESOURCE NOMIN REV S -041 ADMIN DETERMIN - DIR DECISION S -042 ADMIN DETERMIN - PC DECISION 5 -043 SIGN PLAN REVIEW S -044 MASTER SIGN PROGRAM S -045 LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE PERMIT S -046 MOVED BUILDING SITE PLAN REV S -047 ZONING CONFORM LETTER /REV 5 -048 MOD1F. TO DISCRET APPROVAL S -049 TIME EXTENSION REVIEW S -050 APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMM S -051 APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL S -052 STREET ADDRESS CHANGE S -053 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE S -054 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT 5 -055 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT S -056 ADULT USE PLANNING PERMIT S -057 AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT S -058 ANIMAL PERMIT 5 -059 ANIMAL PERMIT RENEWAL S -060 ANIMAL PERMIT APPEAL S -061 BUSINESS ZONING CLEARANCE S -062 PUBLIC NOTICING Key to Symbols: # - Occurs Infrequently Market Sensitive Chapter V - Personal Choice Public Services Table 1 Planning Services (Continued) Profit Revenue Cost (Subsidy► (3) $4,050 $7,340 $100 $0 $4,050 $100 $935 $0 $375 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,800 $0 $750 $0 $1,800 $1,404 $0 $235 $235 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25 $3,175 NA (4) $26,847 $41,544 $10,386 $1,134 $8,202 $ 1,367 $5,243 $1,510 $4,040 $1,347 $7,196 $2,222 $1,648 $ 3,876 $1,164 $443 $1,029 $26,090 $9,747 $3,759 $2,199 $3,098 $546 $99,986 $37,323 $10,028 $6,857 $4,430 $675 $338 $1,612 $36,821 NA (5) $(22,797) $(34,204) $(10,286) $(1,134) $(4,152) $(1,267) $(4,308) $(1,510) $(3,665) $(1,347) $(7,1961 $(2,222) $(1,648) $(1,076) $(1,164) $307 $(1,029) $124,290) $(8,343) $(3,759) $(1,964) $(2,863) $(546) $(99,986) $(37,323) $(10,028) $(6,857) $(4,430) $(675) Percent Recovery Current Suggest (6) 17► 15.1% 100.0% 17.7% 100.0% 1.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 49.4% 100.0% 7.3% 100.0% 17.8% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 9.3% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 72.2% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 169.3% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 6.9% 100.0% 14.4% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 10.7% 50.0% 7.6% 50.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% $(338) 0.0% 100.0% $11,587) 1.6% 50.0% $(33,646) 8.6% 100.0% NA NA 100.0% Possible New Revenue (8) $22,800 $34,200 $0 $0 $4,200 $0 $0 $0 $3,700 $O $O $2,200 $1,600 $1,100 $1,200 ($300) $0 $24,300 $8,300 $3,800 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $37,300 $10,000 $0 $4,400 $700 $300 # # a # $0 # $33,600 $0 $68,164 $606,530 $(538,366) 11.2% $447,375 35 City of El Segundo Cost of Services Study City As Impartial Arbiter of Land Use. The City staff, Planning Commission and the City Council require the processes enumerated in the above list as the price of community review, input and ultimate acceptance by neighboring properties of land development. Such municipal review is basically required by State law, assigning the role of impartial arbiter of land use decisions to local government -- cities and counties. While it would be grossly unfair, and probably foolhardy and expensive as well, to totally deny all development, some cities have chosen this course. The City is by law put into the unenviable position of being the impartial arbiter; a referee over development. Therefore, it seems logical that the development industry bear the full cost of the services to regulate its development. Not more than cost, nor less than cost; but only full cost recovery through fees charged. Infrequent Services. To avoid overstating possible new revenue, some services are marked with the pound sign ( #). These services have been included to calculate the current cost but there may be no demand for some or all of these "marked" services in any single fiscal year. Conclusion of Planning Services If the suggestions made in Appendix A are approved, approximately $447,375 in new revenue could be realized annually. 36 Chapter V - Personal Choice Public Services Engineering Services When basic City engineering services are supported by general taxes, there is little reason for taxes to also finance those PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES which mainly benefit a developer, business, or specific property owner. These services represent the costs to those specific groups. 'Table 2 Engineering Services $57,830 $152,503 $(94,673) 37.9% $93,400 Key to Symbols: # - Occurs Infrequently 37 Possible Profit Percent Recovery New Ref # Service Title Revenue Cost (Subsidy) Current Suggest Revenue (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) S -063 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT $8,570 $5,682 $2,888 150.8% 100.0% ($2,900) S -064 EXCAVATION PERMIT $9,570 $11,330 $(1,760) 84.5% 100.0% $1,800 S -065 UTILITY STREET CUT PERMIT $18,240 $28,775 $(10,535) 63.4% 100.0% $10,500 S -066 ENCROACH LICENSE AGREEMENT NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -067 STREET CLOSURE REVIEW $0 $216 $(216) 0.0% 100.0% $0 # S -068 NEWSRACK PERMIT $50 $106 $(56) 47.2% 100.0% $100 S -069 NEWSRACK IMPOUNDMENT $105 $90 $15 116.7% 100.0% $(0) S -070 FINAL PARCEL MAP CHECK $420 $4,003 $(3,583) 10.5% 100.0% $3,600 S -071 FINAL TRACT MAP PLAN CHECK $280 $6,262 $(5,982) 4.5% 100.0% $6,000 S -072 FINAL MAP AMENDMENT $0 $154 $(154) 0.0% 100.0% $0 # S -073 PUBLIC IMPROVE PLAN CHECK $11,200 $32,110 $(20,910) 34.9% 100.0% $20,900 S -074 PUBLIC IMPROVE INSPECTION $0 $15,075 $(15,075) 0.0% 100.0% $15,100 S -075 CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION $0 $4,508 $(4,508) 0.0% 100.0% $4,500 S -076 RECORD OF SURVEY PLAN CHECK $0 $3,058 $(3,058) 0.0% 100.0% $3,100 S -077 EASEMENT PROCESSING NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -078 QUITCLAIM REVIEW $0 $307 $(307) 0.0% 100.0% $0 # S -079 SURETY & SUBORDINATION REV $0 $15,290 $(15,290) 0.0% 100.0% $15,300 S -080 LIEN REMOVAL $0 $154 $(154) 0.0% 100.0% $0 # S -081 DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEW $0 $461 $(461) 0.0% 100.0% $0 # S -082 STOCKPILE /BORROW SITE P/C $0 $338 $(338) 0.0% 100.0% $0 # S -083 MINOR PLAN CHECK REVISION $0 $15,370 $(15,370) 0.0% 100.0% $15,400 S -084 STREET NAME CHANGE NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -085 ALLEY /STREET VACATION REVIEW NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -086 ASSESS. DIST FORM RESEARCH NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -087 CITY PROP ACQUISITION PROC NA NA NA NA 100.0% $0 S -088 WIDE & OVERLOAD PERMIT $9,000 $8,778 $222 102.5% 100.0% $0 S -089 BLUEPRINT COPY SERVICE $395 $436 $(41) 90.6% 100.0% $0 $57,830 $152,503 $(94,673) 37.9% $93,400 Key to Symbols: # - Occurs Infrequently 37 City of E/ Segundo Cost of Services Study City as Protector of Public Right -of -Way. Many of the services listed above are for review and inspection of either new public infrastructure or impacts to existing infrastructure. It is incumbent on the City to review all of these impacts to its infrastructure. The fees proposed are to recover this review and inspection cost so as to insure that the City's infrastructure is restored to its original state. Development Services. Other services listed above are part of the development process with the subdivision of new lots. As with Planning services, it is the cost of development that would not be incurred otherwise. Such municipal review is basically required by State law, assigning the role of impartial arbiter of land use decisions to local government -- cities and counties. Therefore, it seems logical that the development industry bear the full cost of the services to regulate its development. Not more than cost, nor less than cost; but only full cost recovery through fees charged. Infrequent Services. To avoid overstating possible new revenue, some services are marked with the pound sign ( #). These services have been included to calculate the current cost but there may be no demand for some or all of these "marked" services in any single fiscal year. Conclusion of Engineering Services If the suggestions made in Appendix A are approved, approximately $93,400 in new revenue could be realized annually. Chapter V - Personal Choice Public Services Building Safety Services Table 3 lists the services related to the plan check and inspection of construction on private property within the City. Table 3 Building Safety Services $2,361,182 $2,835,578 $(474,396) 83.3% $474,400 Building Plan Check and Inspection is currently being subsidized. The City provides plan heck and inspection services of actual development. The City is currently undercharging for plan check and inspection services by about 20 %. Therefore, RCS is proposing that the City increase its plan check and inspection /permit fees to cover the full costs of providing the services. in addition, the City charges individual trade permit fees for electrical, plumbing, and mechanical permits. RCS is also recommending that these fees increase to cover the actual cost of providing the various plan check and inspection services. All of the fees are detailed in Appendix B of this Report. Separate Fund for Accelerated Plan Check Service. The City currently provides, as a service to its customers, a process to plan check a project quicker than the normal process. To insure that this process does not affect the applicants who are part of the normal process, the accelerated process only uses outside contractors or staff during overtime. The applicant is then charged the full costs of providing this service. Currently the revenues for the accelerated plan check process are accounted for within the General Fund. This method makes it less clear which expenses are being charged against it and therefore harder to match up revenues and expenses. It also makes the General Fund budget of these departments seem larger than they really are because of the artificial increase in revenues and expenses related to the accelerated process. Therefore, the City should set up a separate fund for accelerated plan check services. This will allow the City to track these revenues and expenses separate from normal revenues and expenses and not distort the General Fund. 39 Possible Profit Percent Recovery New Ref # Service Title Revenue Cost (Subsidy) Current Suggest Revenue (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) S -090 BUILDING PLAN CHECK $1,304,862 $1,445,181 $(140,319) 90.3% 100.0% $140,300 S -091 BUILDING INSPECTION $1,016,320 $1,340,397 $(324,077) 75.8% 100.0% $324,100 S -092 MAP /PLAN /FILE SCANNING $40,000 $50,000 $(10,000) 80.0% 100.0% $10,000 $2,361,182 $2,835,578 $(474,396) 83.3% $474,400 Building Plan Check and Inspection is currently being subsidized. The City provides plan heck and inspection services of actual development. The City is currently undercharging for plan check and inspection services by about 20 %. Therefore, RCS is proposing that the City increase its plan check and inspection /permit fees to cover the full costs of providing the services. in addition, the City charges individual trade permit fees for electrical, plumbing, and mechanical permits. RCS is also recommending that these fees increase to cover the actual cost of providing the various plan check and inspection services. All of the fees are detailed in Appendix B of this Report. Separate Fund for Accelerated Plan Check Service. The City currently provides, as a service to its customers, a process to plan check a project quicker than the normal process. To insure that this process does not affect the applicants who are part of the normal process, the accelerated process only uses outside contractors or staff during overtime. The applicant is then charged the full costs of providing this service. Currently the revenues for the accelerated plan check process are accounted for within the General Fund. This method makes it less clear which expenses are being charged against it and therefore harder to match up revenues and expenses. It also makes the General Fund budget of these departments seem larger than they really are because of the artificial increase in revenues and expenses related to the accelerated process. Therefore, the City should set up a separate fund for accelerated plan check services. This will allow the City to track these revenues and expenses separate from normal revenues and expenses and not distort the General Fund. 39 City of El Segundo Cost of Services Study Fire Services Table 4, following, lists various service centers mostly representing the full costs associated with providing fire safety plan review and inspection of businesses within the City. The services provided by Environmental Safety are targeted towards those businesses that have a higher level of risk due to the nature of the business. Table 4 Fire Services Ref # (1) Service Title (2) Revenue (3) Cost (4) Profit (Subsidy) (5) S -093 ANNUAL BUSINESS FIRE INSPECT $145,000 $326,811 $(181,811 S -094 ANNUAL BUSINESS FIRE REINSP $0 $10,826 $(10,826 S -095 ANNUAL FIRE PERMIT $33,250 $29,523 $3,72 S -096 TEMPORARY FIRE PERMIT $2,565 $13,693 $(11,128 S -097 FIRE HIGH RISE INSPECTION $103,488 $94,324 $9,16 S -098 FIRE SPRINKLER PC /INSPECT $145,951 $175,845 $(29,894 S -099 FIRE ALARM PLAN CHECK/INSP $90,092 $108,545 $(18,453 S -100 FIRE EXTINGUISH SYST PC /INSP $9,513 $11,461 $(1,948 S -101 FIRE PROTECTION TESTING $8,800 $18,486 $(9,686 S -102 STATE MANDATED FIRE INSPECT $0 $1,259 $(1,259 S -103 SPECIAL FIRE EQUIP INSP /APPR $0 $777 $(777 S -104 HAZARDOUS MAT'LS INSP PROG $69,496 $232,010 $(162,514 S -105 CHEM ACCID RELEASE PREV PRG $15,750 $22,009 $(6,259 S -106 HAZ WASTE GENERATOR PERMIT $37,494 $94,763 $(57,269 S -107 NEW INDUST WASTE PRMT /INSP $7,566 $12,558 $(4,992 S -108 REVISED INDUST WASTE PMT/INS $4,402 $6,714 $(2,312 S -109 INDUST WASTE ANNUAL INSPECT $12,772 $51,316 $(38,544 S -110 UNDERGROUND TANK PERMIT $22,940 $50,237 $(27,297 S -111 ABOVE GROUND LIQ TANK INSP $36,800 $83,930 $(47,130 S -112 REV OF RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN $51,330 $201,842 $(150,512 S -113 FIRE STORMWATER INSPECTION $6,710 $24,260 $(17,550 S -114 HAZ MATERIALS RESPONSE NA NA N S -115 NEW CONSTR. FIRE RE- INSPECT $0 $179 $(179 S -116 AFTER -HOURS FIRE INSPECTION $0 $525 $(525 Key to Symbols: # - Occurs Infrequently - Market Sensitive .Y Percent Recovery N Possible 44.4% 1 100.0% $ $181,800 0.0% 1 100.0% $ $0 " $803,919 $1,571,893 $(767,974) 51.1% $608,900 Chapter V - Personal Choice Public Services Conclusion of Fire Services If the suggestions made in Appendix A are approved, approximately $608,900 in taxes currently used to subsidize these services could be freed up. 41 City of El Segundo Cost of Services Study Administrative Services Miscellaneous service centers fall into this group. Table 5 Administrative Services $26,905 $379,060 $(352,155) 7.1% $349,800 Key to Symbols: # - Occurs Infrequently Summary of Administrative Services. If the above suggestions were adopted, the City should generate about $349,800 in additional annual revenue. 42 Possible Profit Percent Recovery New Ref # Service Title Revenue Cost (Subsidy) Current Suggest Revenue (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) S -117 NEW BUSINESS LIC. PROC. $0 $44,447 $(44,447) 0.0% 100.0% $44,400 S -118 BUSINESS LIC RENEWAL PROC $0 $295,495 $(295,495) 0.0% 100.0% $295,500 S -119 FILM PERMIT PROCESSING $26,725 $36,517 $(9,792) 73.2% 100.0% $9,800 S -120 COPY SERVICE $0 $270 $(270) 0.0% 100.0% $0 S -121 DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION $0 $183 $(183) 0.0% 100.0% $200 S -122 VIDEO /AUDIO COPYING $180 $115 $65 156.5% 100.0% ($100) S -123 INITIATIVE PROCESSING $0 $2,033 $(2,033) 0.0% 100.0% $0 # $26,905 $379,060 $(352,155) 7.1% $349,800 Key to Symbols: # - Occurs Infrequently Summary of Administrative Services. If the above suggestions were adopted, the City should generate about $349,800 in additional annual revenue. 42 Chapter V - Personal Choice Public Services Summary of Personal Choice Public Services The following Table 6 summarizes the recommendations and suggestions made in this Chapter. Table 6 Summary Result of Adoption. If all the recommendations and suggestions made in this Chapter and in Appendix A are adopted, the City would raise almost $2 Million on an annual basis. Taxpayer Equity Achieved. By taking such positive actions, the City's financial picture would be improved, far more equity between taxpayers and fee - payers could be gained, and fairness between property- related and non - property - related services could be secured. The above table shows that the City is subsidizing PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES with $2,227,564 in tax dollars. Should the City Council feel that tax dollars are insufficient, this chapter has shown that there are many opportunities to either increase the fee or lower the cost of PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES. A Master Fee Resolution RCS recommends that the City adopt a Master Fee Resolution which Finance updates and has the City Council adopt annually. RCS will work with the Finance Department to help implement this Resolution. Policy Regarding "New" Services RCS also recommends that the City Council adopt a policy of not starting any new service without a cost analysis, using the costing approach utilized in this Report, so as to 43 Possible Profit Percent Recovery New SERVICE GROUP Revenue Cost (Subsidy) Current Suggest Revenue PLANNING SERVICES $68,164 $606,530 ($538,366) 11.2% VAR. $447,375 ENGINEERING SERVICES $57,830 $152,503 ($94,673) 37.9% 100.0% $93,400 BUILDING SAFETY SERVICES $2,361,182 $2,835,578 ($474,396) 83.3% 100.0% $474,400 FIRE SERVICES $803,919 $1,571,893 ($767,974) 51.1% 100.0% $608,900 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $26,905 $379,060 ($352,155) 7.1% 100.0% $349,800 TOTAL $3,318,000 $5,545,564 ($2,227,564) 59.8% $1,973,875 Result of Adoption. If all the recommendations and suggestions made in this Chapter and in Appendix A are adopted, the City would raise almost $2 Million on an annual basis. Taxpayer Equity Achieved. By taking such positive actions, the City's financial picture would be improved, far more equity between taxpayers and fee - payers could be gained, and fairness between property- related and non - property - related services could be secured. The above table shows that the City is subsidizing PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES with $2,227,564 in tax dollars. Should the City Council feel that tax dollars are insufficient, this chapter has shown that there are many opportunities to either increase the fee or lower the cost of PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES. A Master Fee Resolution RCS recommends that the City adopt a Master Fee Resolution which Finance updates and has the City Council adopt annually. RCS will work with the Finance Department to help implement this Resolution. Policy Regarding "New" Services RCS also recommends that the City Council adopt a policy of not starting any new service without a cost analysis, using the costing approach utilized in this Report, so as to 43 City of E/ Segundo Cost of Services Study determine ways in which the service could be fee - financed, if at all possible. This approach could be used when considering new parks or public buildings, improved police protection, new recreation programs, social services and any other desired function or service. Conclusion RCS is available to discuss the process and results with the City Council. In addition, we can share our experience of doing this for over two hundred cities as the City Council determines what action to take. CHAPTER VI ACTION PLAN The purpose of this chapter is to suggest techniques that the City could use to institutionalize the processes discussed in this Report. Internal Support Services Suggested course of action: Make sure that customer departments (i.e. all "INTERNAL SUPPORT" and "PUBLIC" service departments) understand that the "internal support service charges" are part of their budgeted cost. Encourage "INTERNAL SUPPORT' service units to refine their record - keeping so that the cost of each "INTERNAL SUPPORT' service has been fairly charged to other departments. Promote a dialogue between "INTERNAL SUPPORT" service units and their customers to insure that "customer" departments believe that there is a service value that favorably relates to the service cost. Where ever possible, use private sector prices as a way to measure the efficiency of the "INTERNAL SUPPORT" service. Use customer satisfaction as the measure of its effectiveness. Ultimately, where ever possible, allow customer departments to contract with either the "INTERNAL SUPPORT" service or the private sector. Public Services In general, suggested course of action: Require that "PUBLIC SERVICE" providers maintain records of their customer demand patterns and that they use this information to project the demand for their services in the future. 45 City of El Segundo Cost of Services Study Require that "PUBLIC SERVICE" providers base their budget requests on the projected demand for their services. Establish a monthly reporting system to track actual units of service provided against the projected demand for the service from #1. Establish plans in advance for how to handle long -term staffing levels should the actual service pattern deviate from the projected demand. Establish plans in advance for how to utilize staff should the short -term actual service pattern deviate from the projected demand. Personal Choice Public Services As much as possible, require that the service costs be 100% recovered from fees and charges in order to get the maximum feedback from the customer on whether the value of the service is in line with its fee. The fee can equal the cost by any combination of lowering the cost and raising the fee. 2. Attempt to measure the efficiency of services by comparing "best practices" from other agencies. 3. Measure effectiveness of the services by customer surveys. Community - Supported Public Services Require that each service develop a capital replacement plan that will maintain the related City infrastructure at an agreed upon level. 2. Require that the annual budget for each COMMUNITY - SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICE include either an expenditure or a reservation of monies for the annual infrastructure replacement identified in #1. 3. Measure the efficiency of COMMUNITY - SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICES by comparison with the best practices of other agencies. 4. Measure the effectiveness of the COMMUNITY - SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICES by periodic City Council or public survey. Let the voters decide on assessment options that are meaningful and where the City Council is committed to follow the results. A "Yes" vote means the voters want something. 46 Chapter V1- Action Plan A "No" vote means that they don't want it and let's accept that rather than trying to give the voters something in spite of the fact that they just voted "No ". This latter habit, all too common in local government, causes voter skepticism and a tendency to go for another initiative. Summary The City of El Segundo has the opportunity to use the management information in this Report and computer software along with input from its staff to make significant strides towards insuring the City's future fiscal health and appearance. END 47 (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK) APPENDIX A PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICE DETAIL (In Sequence by Reference No.) CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT S -001 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review a use that can be approved adminstratively to determine conformance with City codes and standards. i i CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $500 per application REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $500.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $4,000 UNIT COST: $3,346.00 TOTAL COST: $26,768 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,846.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(22,768) TOTAL UNITS: 8 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 14.94% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $3,345 per application July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT S -001 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 8 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 15.00 $1,661.10 8 $13,289 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 4.25 $294.57 8 $2.357 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.50 $130.12 8 $1,041 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 5.42 $1,260.26 8 $10,082 TYPE SUBTOTAL 25.17 $3,346.05 $26,768 TOTALS 25.17 $3,346.00 $26,768 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT S -002 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /ResidenVBusiness DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Evaivate a minor use to determine conformance with City codes and standards, and preprare a staff report to the Planning Commission. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $675 per application - SFR < 10 units $675 per application - MFR <= 6 units $935 per application - SFR >= 10 units $935 per application - MFR > 6 units $935 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $1,835 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $675.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $1,350 UNIT COST- $3,346.00 TOTAL COST: $6,692 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,671.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(5,342) TOTAL UNITS: 2 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 20.17% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $3,345 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT S -002 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 2 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 15.00 $1,661.10 2 $3,322 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 4.25 $294.57 2 $589 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.50 $130.12 2 $260 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 5.42 $1,260.26 2 $2,521 TYPE SUBTOTAL 25.17 $3,346.05 $6,692 TOTALS 25.17 $3,346.00 $6,692 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. MAJOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT S -003 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Evaluate a major use to determine conformance with City codes and standards, and prepare staff reports to the Planning Commission. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $675 per application - SFR < 10 units $675 per application - MFR <= 6 units $935 per application - SFR >= 10 units $935 per application - MFR > 6 units $935 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $1,835 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $935.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $3,740 UNIT COST: $6,857.25 TOTAL COST: $27,429 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(5,922.25) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(23,689) TOTAL UNITS: 4 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 13.64% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $6,855 per application July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE MAJOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REFERENCE NO. S -003 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 4 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 1.00 $110.74 4 $443 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 4.75 $329.22 4 $1,317 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 1.00 $260.23 4 $1,041 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 9.67 $2,248.47 4 $8,994 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER 23.50 $3,908.52 4 $15,634 TYPE SUBTOTAL 39.92 $6,857.18 TOTALS 39.92 $6,857.25 July 18. 2008 $27,4291 $27,429 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN REVIEW S -004 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a the design and architectural elements of a project in the Downtown Specific Plan Area to determine conformance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $448.92 TOTAL COST: $10,774 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(448.92) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(10,774) TOTAL UNITS: 24 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $450 per application July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ARCHITECTURAUDESIGN REVIEW S -004 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 24 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.50 $116.26 24 $2,790 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER 2.00 $332.64 24 $7,983 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.50 $448.90 $10,774 TOTALS 2.50 $448.92 $10,774 1 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. VARIANCE REVIEW S -005 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a proposed variance from the terms of the Zoning Code and prepare a staff report for the Planning Commission. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $675 per application - SFR < 10 units $675 per application - MFR <= 6 units $935 per application - SFR >= 10 units $935 per application - MFR > 6 units $935 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $1,835 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $935.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $2,805 UNIT COST: $6,857.33 TOTAL COST: $20,572 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(5,922.33) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(17,767) TOTAL UNITS: 3 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 13.64% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $6,855 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. VARIANCE REVIEW S -005 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 3 DEPARTMENT POSITION PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS 1.00 $110.74 3 $332 4.75 $329.22 3 $988 1.00 $260.23 3 $781 9.67 $2,248.47 3 $6,745 23.50 $3,908.52 3 $11,726 TYPE SUBTOTAL TOTALS 39.92 $6,857.18 39.92 $6,857.33 July 18, 2008 $20,572 1 $20,572 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ADJUSTMENT REVIEW S -006 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a minor adjustment from the terms of the Zoning Code. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $375 per application - SFR < '10 units $375 per application - MFR <= 6 units $520 per application - SFR >= 10 units $520 per application - MFR > 6 units $520 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $1,020 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $520.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $1,040 UNIT COST: $2,571.00 TOTAL COST: $5,142 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,051.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(4,102) TOTAL UNITS: 2 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 20.23% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $2,570 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE 19.42 $2,570.92 REFERENCE NO. ADJUSTMENT REVIEW TOTALS S -006 $2,571.00 $5,142 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 2 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSI PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 10.50 $1,162.77 2 $2,326 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST 11 4.25 $294.57 2 $589 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 1.00 $260.23 2 $520 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.67 $853.35 2 $1,707 TYPE SUBTOTAL 19.42 $2,570.92 $5,142 TOTALS 19.42 $2,571.00 $5,142 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT /ZONE CHANGE S -007 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review a request to amend or change the regulations established by zoning maps and the Municipal Code. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $935 per application - SFR < 10 units $935 per application - MFR <= 6 units $1,320 per application - SFR >= 10 units $1,320 per application - MFR > 6 units $1,320 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $2,645 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 2 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ZONE TEXT AMENDMENVZONE CHANGE S -007 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 2 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 2 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18, 2008 so I CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRE - APPLICATION REVIEW S -008 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a project submitted before application submittal to discuss any issues which may cause problems during the formal application process. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $55 per application - SFR < 10 units $55 per application - MFR <= 6 units $80 per application - SFR >= 10 units $80 per application - MFR > 6 units $80 per application - CommerciaUlndustrial < 15,000 square feet $155 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $155.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $3,100 UNIT COST: $3,409.35 TOTAL COST: $68,187 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY). $(3,254.35) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(65,087) TOTAL UNITS: 20 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 4.55% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $3,410 per application. This fee gets the applicant two meetings with staff. Half of this fee will be credited towards any future fees for this project. July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRE - APPLICATION REVIEW S -008 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 20 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 4.00 $1,040.92 20 $20,818 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 5.00 $1,162.60 20 $23,252 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER 7.25 $1,205.82 20 $24,116 TYPE SUBTOTAL 16.25 $3,409.34 $68,187 TOTALS 16.25 $3,409.35 $68,1871 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -200$ SERVICE REFERENCE NO. TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW S -009 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING STUDY Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a traffic study for a proposed project to determine the traffic impacts related to the project. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $1,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE. $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW S -009 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18, 2008 $0 i CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. OFFSITE PARKING COVENANT S -010 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of an off -site parking covenant for a proposed project to allow it to meet its parking requirements. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $80 per application - SFR >= 10 units $80 per application - MFR > 6 units $80 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $155 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $117.50 TOTAL REVENUE: $705 UNIT COST: $301.33 TOTAL COST: $1,808 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(183.83) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,103) TOTAL UNITS: 6 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 38.99% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $300 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. OFF -SITE PARKING COVENANT S -010 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 6 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST 11 0.17 $11.78 6 $71 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.25 $65.06 6 $390 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.25 $58.13 6 $349 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER 1.00 $166.32 6 $998 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.67 $301.29 $1,808 TOTALS 1.67 $301.33 $1,808 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PARKING DEMAND /SHARED PARKING STUDY S -011 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING STUDY Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of the parking demand or the shared parking demand generated by a proposed project. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $80 per application - SFR >= 10 units $80 per application - MFR > 6 units $80 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $155 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $155.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $465 UNIT COST: $3,287.33 TOTAL COST: $9,862 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(3,'132.33) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(9,397) TOTAL UNITS: 3 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 4.72% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $3,285 per study plus actual costs for Traffic Engineer July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE 17.17 $3,287.24 REFERENCE NO. TOTALS 17.17 PARKING DEMAND /SHARED PARKING STUDY $9,862 S -011 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 3 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSI PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 1.50 $103.97 3 $312 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI + Tfaff Eng Deposit 2.50 $650.58 3 $1,952 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 5.17 $1,202.13 3 $3,606 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER 8.00 $1,330.56 3 $3,992 TYPE SUBTOTAL 17.17 $3,287.24 $9,862 TOTALS 17.17 $3,287.33 $9,862 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW S -012 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Make recommendations regarding a proposed amendment to the City Comprehensive General Plan and prepare reports to the Planning Commission and City Council. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $935 per application - SFR < 10 units $935 per application - MFR <= 6 units $1,320 per application - SFR >= 10 units $1,320 per application - MFR > 6 units $1,320 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $2,645 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW S -013 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review, comment on, and take to hearing, a specific plan for development of a specific parcel of property. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0,00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW S -014 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review, comment on, and take to hearing, an amendment to a previously approved specific plan. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW S -014 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18. 2008 $0 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SPHERE. OF INFLUENCE AMENDMENT S -015 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a proposed amendment to an existing sphere of influence to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AMENDMENT S-015 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18. 2008 $o I CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ANNEXATION REQUEST REVIEW S -016 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Non- Resident DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review and process a reqeust to annex to the City. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ANNEXATION REQUEST REVIEW S -016 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18, 2008 $0 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. CFD ANNEXATION REQUEST REVIEW S -017 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review and process a request to annex to an existing Community Facilities District. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. CFD ANNEXATION REQUEST REVIEW S -017 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18, 2008 $o I CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW S -018 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING AGREEMENT Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Develop, negotiate, and enforce agreements to develop land within specific physical requirements. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW S -018 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18. 2008 $0 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT S -019 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a proposed development within the Coastal Zone. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $385 per application - SFR >= 10 units $385 per application - MFR > 6 units $385 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $750 per application - Commercial /industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $385.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $385 UNIT COST: $766.00 TOTAL COST: $766 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(381.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(381) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 50.26% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $770 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REFERENCE NO. S -019 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 0.50 $34.66 1 $35 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 1.00 $232.52 1 $233 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER 3.00 $498.96 1 $499 TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.50 $766.14 $766 TOTALS 4.50 $766.00 $7661 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REV S -020 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Reviewing a request to deviate from City residential design standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $750 per application - SFR >= 10 units $750 per application - MFR > 6 units $750 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $1,180 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007.2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REV S -020 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18, 2008 So i CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS S -021 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a project through the City's Fiscal Impact Analysis Model to determine the fiscal impact of a proposed project plus any amendment to an already preprared analysis. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE New: Single -Use Residential - $750 Single -Use Commercial - $1,500 Single -Use Industrial - $1,500 Two -Use Mixed - $2,000 Three Use Mixed - $2,500 Amendment: Single -Use Project - $250 Two -Use Project - $500 Three -Use Project - $750 REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $7,400.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $7,400 UNIT COST: $7,400.00 TOTAL COST: $7,400 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 100.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% In House: New: Single -Use Residential - $750 Single -Use Commercial - $1,500 Single -Use Industrial - $1,500 Two -Use Mixed - $2,000 Three Use Mixed - $2,500 Amendment: Single -Use Project - $250 Two -Use Project - $500 Three -Use Project - $750 Actual costs if performed by an outside consultant July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS S -021 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING $37,000 Over 5 Years 0.00 $7,400.00 1 $7,400 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $7,400.00 $7,400 TOTALS 0.00 $7,400.00 $7,400 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SMOKY HOLLOW FLOATING ZONE PROC. S -022 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a project in the Smoky Hollow Floating Zone to determine conformance with City Codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $1,060 per application - SFR >= 10 units $1,060 per application - MFR > 6 units $1,060 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $2,085 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SMOKY HOLLOW FLOATING ZONE PROC. S -022 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18, 2008 $0 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SMOKY HOLLOW SITE PLAN S -023 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a site plan for a project in the Smoky Hollow Zone for conformance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $750 per application - SFR >= 10 units $750 per application - MFR > 6 units $750 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $1,180 per application - Commercial/industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $857.50 TOTAL REVENUE: $6,860 UNIT COST: $2,589.63 TOTAL COST: $20,717 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,732.13) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(13,857) TOTAL UNITS: 8 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 33.11% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $2,060 per application - < 15,000 square feet $4,180 per application - >= 15,000 square feet July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SMOKY HOLLOW SITE PLAN S -023 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 8 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSI PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER <15k Sq Ft 2.42 $562.70 6 $3,376 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER <15k Sq Ft 9.00 $1,496.88 6 $8,981 TYPE SUBTOTAL 11.42 $2,059.58 $12,357 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 15k+ Sq Ft 4.25 $294.57 2 $589 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 15k+ Sq Ft 0.50 $130.12 2 $260 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 15k+ Sq Ft 5.42 $1,260.26 2 $2,521 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER 15k+ Sq Ft 15.00 $2,494.80 2 $4,990 TYPE SUBTOTAL 25.17 $4,179.75 $8,360 TOTALS 36.59 $2,589.63 July 18. 2008 $20,717 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT REVIEW S -024 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING AGREEMENT Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Reviewing a request for a density bonus agreement. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT REVIEW S -024 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18, 2008 $0 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ENVIRON. CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION S -025 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of an application which states that a particular development is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $37 per application REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $37.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $3,330 UNIT COST: $130.83 TOTAL COST: $11,775 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(93.83) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(8,445) TOTAL UNITS: 90 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 28.28% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $130 per application July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ENVIRON. CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION S -025 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 90 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 0.50 $55.37 90 $4,983 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 0.25 $17.33 90 $1,560 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.25 $58.13 90 $5,232 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $130.83 $11,775 TOTALS 1.00 $130.83 $11,775 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ENVIRON INITIAL STUDY /NEG DEC /RECIR S -026 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Reviewing and filing a report declaring that the proposed project will have no siginificant impact on the environment or will have impacts that will be mitigated below a level of siginificance through a Negative Declaration or Recirculated Negative Dec. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $935 per application if with no other applications. $3,650 deposit - SFR < 10 units $3,650 deposit - MFR <= 6 units $3,650 deposit - SFR >= 10 units $3,650 deposit - MFR > 6 units $3,650 deposit - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $4,105 deposit - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $935.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $5,610 UNIT COST: $3,546.83 TOTAL COST: $21,281 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,611.83) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(15,671) TOTAL UNITS: 6 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 26.36% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $3,545 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ENVIRON INITIAL STUDYMEG DEVRECIR S -026 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 6 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 17.00 $1,882.58 6 $11,295 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST If 4.25 $294.57 6 $1,767 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.50 $130.12 6 $781 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 4.67 $1,085.87 6 $6,515 ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO 1.00 $153.70 6 $922 TYPE SUBTOTAL TOTALS 27.42 $3,546.84 27.42 $3,546.83 July 18, 2008 $21,281 1 $21,281 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REVIEW S -027 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING REPORT Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a consultant prepoared Environmental Impact Report regarding a proposed development and preparing a staff report. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $3,650 deposit - SFR < 10 units $3,650 deposit - MFR <= 6 units $3,650 deposit - SFR >= 10 units $3,650 deposit - MFR > 6 units $3,650 deposit - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $4,105 deposit - Commercial /industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REVIEW S -027 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18. 2008 $0 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. MITIGATION MONITORING S -028 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING PROJECT Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Monitoring the mitigation measures imposed during the environmental review process. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $422.73 TOTAL COST: $4,650 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(422.73) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(4,650) TOTAL UNITS: 11 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Minor - $465 per project Major - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRECISE PLAN MODIFICATION REVIEW S -029 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a modification to an already existing precise plan to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Residential: $810 per application - SFR < 10 units $810 per application - MFR <= 6 units $1,125 per application - SFR >= 10 units $1,125 per application - MFR > 6 units Commercial: $1,560 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $3,060 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRECISE PLAN MODIFICATION REVIEW S -029 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SU8TOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18. 2008 $0 1 CITY OF EL. SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP REVIEW S -030 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING MAP Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a tentative parcel map to subdivide one to four lots to assure accuracy and compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $675 per application - SFR < 10 units $675 per application - MFR <= 6 units $935 per application - SFR >= 10 units $935 per application - MFR > 6 units $935 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $1,835 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $675.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $4,050 UNIT COST: $4,474.50 TOTAL COST: $26,847 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(3,799.50) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(22,797) TOTAL UNITS: 6 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 15.09% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $4,475 per map (Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by the applicant) July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP REVIEW S -030 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 6 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 4.25 $294.57 6 $1.767 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.50 $130.12 6 $781 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 5.42 $1,260.26 6 $7,562 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER 14.00 $2,328.48 6 $13,971 ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO Plus County 3.00 $461.10 6 $2,767 TYPE SUBTOTAL 27.17 $4,474.53 $26,847 TOTALS 27.17 $4,474.50 July 18, 2008 $26,847 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP REVIEW S -031 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING MAP Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review a tentative tract map to subdivide 5 or more lots to assure accuracy and compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $675 per application - SFR < 10 units $675 per application - MFR <= 6 units $935 per application - SFR >= 10 units $935 per application - MFR > 6 units $935 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $1,835 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $1,835.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $7,340 UNIT COST: $10,386.00 TOTAL COST: $41,544 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(8,551.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(34,204) TOTAL UNITS: 4 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 17.67% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $4,475 per map plus $370 per lot for every lot over 4 (Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by the applicant) July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP REVIEW S -031 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 4 DEPARTMENT PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING ENGINEERING POSITION TYPE OFFICE SPECIALIST II PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI PLANNING MANAGER PRINCIPAL PLANNER SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO 20 Lots + County TYPE SUBTOTAL TOTALS UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS' 4.25 $294.57 4 $1,178 0.50 $130.12 4 $520 5.67 $1,318.39 4 $5,274 15.00 $2,494.80 4 $9,979 40.00 $6,148.00 4 $24,592 65.42 $10,385.88 $41,544 65.42 $10,386.00 $41,544 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP REVIEW S -032 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING MAP Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a vesting tentative tract map to subdivide 5 or more lots with vesting rights to assure compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $100 per map REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $100.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $100 UNIT COST: $10,386.00 TOTAL COST: $10,386 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(10,286.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(10,286) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.96% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $4,475 per map plus $370 per lot for every lot over 4 (Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by the applicant) July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP REVIEW S -032 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST 11 4.25 $294.57 1 $295 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.50 $130.12 1 $130 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 5.67 $1,318.39 1 $1,318 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER 15.00 $2,494.80 1 $2,495 ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO 20 Lots + County 40.00 $6,148.00 1 $6,148 TYPE SUBTOTAL 65.42 $10,385.88 $10,386 TOTALS 65.42 $10,386.00 July 18. 2008 $10,3861 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. RESUBMITTED MAP REVIEW S -033 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING MAP Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Reviewing a proposed change to an already approved tentative map. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $1,134.00 TOTAL COST: $1,134 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,134.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,134) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $1,135 per map July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. RESUBMITTED MAP REVIEW S -033 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 3.75 $415.28 1 $415 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 0.33 $22.87 1 $23 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.67 $174.35 1 $174 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 1.58 $367.38 1 $367 ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO 1.00 $153.70 1 $154 TYPE SUBTOTAL TOTALS 7.33 $1,133.58 7.33 $1,134.00 July 18, 2008 $1,134 $1,134 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT S -034 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a proposed change to the property boundary between two lots and checking the drawings of the maps relating to such change. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $675 per application - SFR < 10 units $675 per application - MFR <= 6 units $935 per application - SFR >= 10 units $935 per application - MFR > 6 units $935 per application - Comm ercial/Industrial < 15,000 square feet $1,835 per application - Commercial/Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE, $675.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $4,050 UNIT COST: $1,367.00 TOTAL COST: $8,202 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(692.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(4,152) TOTAL UNITS: 6 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 49.38% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $1,365 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT S -034 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 6 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 6.00 $664.44 6 $3,987 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 0.67 $46.44 6 $279 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 2.00 $465.04 6 $2,790 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER 1.00 $191.13 6 $1,147 TYPE SUBTOTAL 9.67 $1,367.05 $8,202 TOTALS 9.67 $1,367.00 $8,202 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. LOT MERGER S -035 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a proposed removal of the property boundary between two lots and checking the drawings of the maps relating to such change. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $100 per application REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $100.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $100 UNIT COST: $1,367.00 TOTAL COST: $1,367 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,267.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,267) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 7.32% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $1,365 per application July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. LOT MERGER S -035 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 6.00 $664.44 1 $664 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST 11 0.67 $46.44 1 $46 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 2.00 $465.04 1 $465 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER 1.00 $191.13 1 $191 TYPE SUBTOTAL 9.67 $1,367.05 $1,367 TOTALS 9.67 $1,367.00 $1,367 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. REVERSION TO ACREAGE S -036 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Processing a request to combine more than one lot into one lot to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $675 per application - SFR < 10 units $675 per application - MFR <= 6 units $935 per application - SFR >= 10 units $935 per application - MFR > 6 units $935 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $1,835 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $935.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $935 UNIT COST: $5,243.00 TOTAL COST: $5,243 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(4,308.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(4,308) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 17.83% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $5,245 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. REVERSION TO ACREAGE S -036 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST 11 4.25 $294.57 1 $295 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.50 $130.12 1 $130 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 5.42 $1,260.26 1 $1.260 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER 14.00 $2,328.48 1 $2.328 ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO Plus County 8.00 $1,229.60 1 $1,230 TYPE SUBTOTAL 32.17 $5,243.03 $5,243 TOTALS 32.17 $5,243.00 July 18. 2008 $5,243 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE REVIEW S -037 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Prepare a Certificate of Compliance to exempt the applicant from the Subdivision Map Act. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $675 per application - SFR < 10 units $675 per application - MFR <= 6 units $935 per application - SFR >= 10 units $935 per application - MFR > 6 units $935 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $1,835 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $1,510.00 TOTAL COST: $1,510 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,510.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,510) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $1,510 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE REVIEW S -037 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER ENGINEERING ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 5.00 $553.70 1 $554 0.67 $46.44 1 $46 0.17 $44.24 1 $44 2.08 $483.64 1 $484 2.00 $382.26 1 $382 TYPE SUBTOTAL TOTALS 9.92 $1,510.28 9.92 $1,510.00 July 18, 2008 $1,510 1 $1,510 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT S -038 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of an easement access that involves multiple parcels where two or more parties are sharing the access. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $125 per application REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $125.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $375 UNIT COST: $1,346.67 TOTAL COST: $4,040 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,221.67) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(3,665) TOTAL UNITS: 3 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 9.28% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $1,345 per application plus actual costs for City Attorney July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT S -038 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 3 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 1.50 $348.78 3 $1,046 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER + City Atty 6.00 $997.92 3 $2,994 TYPE SUBTOTAL 7.50 $1,346.70 $4,040 TOTALS 7.50 $1,346.67 $4,0401 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. CCBR REVIEW S -039 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of the proposed Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for a project to determine conformance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $1,347.00 TOTAL COST: $1,347 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,347.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,347) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $1,350 per application plus actual costs for City Attorney July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE CC &R REVIEW REFERENCE NO. S -039 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 1.50 $348.78 1 $349 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER + City Atty 6.00 $997.92 1 $998 TYPE SUBTOTAL 7.50 $1,346.70 $1,347 TOTALS 7.50 $1,347.00 $1,347 1 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. HISTORIC RESOURCE NOMINATION REVIEW S -040 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of an application to nominate a specific parcel of property as an historic resource to make it eligible for tax reductions. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $7,196.00 TOTAL COST: $7,196 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(7,196.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(7,196) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $7,195 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. HISTORIC RESOURCE NOMINATION REVIEW S -040 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 5.25 $363.88 1 $364 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 3.50 $910.81 1 $911 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 18.67 $4,341.15 1 $4,341 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER 9.50 $1,580.04 1 $1,580 TYPE SUBTOTAL 36.92 $7,195.88 $7,196 TOTALS 36.92 $7,196.00 $7,196 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ADMIN DETERMINATION - DIR DECISION S -041 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a request for an interpretation of a Community Development Director's decision. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $1,111.00 TOTAL COST: $2,222 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,111.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,222) TOTAL UNITS: 2 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $1,110 per application July 1a, 2009 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ADMIN DETERMINATION - DIR DECISION S -041 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 2 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 4.50 $498.33 2 $997 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 0.25 $17.33 2 $35 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.50 $130.12 2 $260 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 2.00 $465.04 2 $930 TYPE SUBTOTAL 7.25 $1,110.82 $2,222 TOTALS 7.25 $1,111.00 $2,222 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ADMIN DETERMINATION - PC DECISION S -042 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a request for an interpretation of a Planning Commission decision. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $1,648.00 TOTAL COST: $1,648 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,648.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,648) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $1,650 per application Juiy 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ADMIN DETERMINATION - PC DECISION S -042 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 6.50 $719.81 1 $720 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 1.25 $86.64 1 $87 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 1.00 $260.23 1 $260 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 2.50 $581.30 1 $581 TYPE SUBTOTAL 11.25 $1,647.98 $1,648 TOTALS 11.25 $1,648.00 $1,648 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SIGN PLAN REVIEW S -043 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of individual signs to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $80 per application - SFR >= 10 units $80 per application - MFR > 6 units $80 per application - Commercial/Industrial < 15,000 square feet $155 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $80.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $2,800 UNIT COST: $910.74 TOTAL COST: $3,876 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(30.74) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,076) TOTAL UNITS: 35 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 72.24% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $110 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SIGN PLAN REVIEW S -043 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 35 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 1.00 $110.74 35 $3,876 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $110.74 $3,876 TOTALS '1.00 $110.74 $3,876 1 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. MASTER SIGN PROGRAM S -044 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review the placement and design of signs for a new project to determine conformance with City codes and standards, and monitoring of plan. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $388.00 TOTAL COST: $1,164 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(388.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,164) TOTAL UNITS: 3 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Minor - $580 per application Major - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE MASTER SIGN PROGRAM REFERENCE NO. S -044 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 3 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER Minor 3.00 $332.22 2 $664 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II Minor 0.25 $17.33 2 $35 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Minor 1.00 $232.52 2 $465 TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.25 $582.07 $1,164 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Major - Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 4.25 $388.00 $1,164 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE PERMIT S -045 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a new Family Day Care operation of more than 6 children for conformance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $375 per application plus $100 if a public hearing is requested REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $375.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $750 UNIT COST: $221.50 TOTAL COST: $443 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $153.50 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $307 TOTAL UNITS: 2 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 169.30% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $220 per application plus $100 if a public hearing is requested. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE PERMIT S -045 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 2 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 2.00 $221.48 2 $443 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.00 $221.48 $443 TOTALS 2.00 $221.50 July 18, 2008 $443 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. MOVED BUILDING SITE PLAN REVIEW S -046 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a site plan of a site that is to have a building moved to it to determine conformance wwth City codes and standards CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $1,029.00 TOTAL COST: $1,029 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,029.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,029) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $1,030 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE MOVED BUILDING SITE PLAN REVIEW REFERENCE NO. S -046 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Totai Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 5.00 $553.70 1 $554 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 1.25 $86.64 1 $87 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 1.67 $388.31 1 $388 TYPE SUBTOTAL 7.92 $1,028.65 $1,029 TOTALS 7.92 $1,029.00 $1,029 1 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ZONING CONFORMANCE LETTERIREVIEW S -047 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING LETTER Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of the zoning of a particular parcel on request where research is required, usually during the due diligence process of escrow. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $45 per application - SFR < 10 units $45 per application - MFR <= 6 units $60 per application - SFR >= 10 units $60 per application - MFR > 6 units $60 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $120 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $51.43 TOTAL REVENUE: $1,800 UNIT COST: $745.43 TOTAL COST: $26,090 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(694.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(24,290) TOTAL UNITS: 35 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 6.90% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $745 per letter July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ZONING CONFORMANCE LETTER/REVIEW S-047 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 35 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 5.00 $553.70 35 $19,380 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 0.25 $17.33 35 $607 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.75 $174.39 35 $6.104 TYPE SUBTOTAL 6.00 $745.42 $26,090 TOTALS 6.00 $745.43 $26,0901 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. MODIF. TO DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL S -048 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a modification to an existing discretionary approval to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Half of Original Fee REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $468.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $1,404 UNIT COST: $3,249.00 TOTAL COST: $9,747 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,781.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(8,343) TOTAL UNITS: 3 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 14.40% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $3,250 per application July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. MODIF. TO DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL S -048 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 3 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 4.25 $294.57 3 $884 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.50 $130.12 3 $390 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.92 $911.48 3 $2,734 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER 11.50 $1,912.88 3 $5.738 TYPE SUBTOTAL 20.17 $3,248.85 $9,747 TOTALS 20.17 $3,249.00 $9,747 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. TIME EXTENSION REVIEW S -049 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review a request to extend the approval period for a development project. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $1,253.00 TOTAL COST: $3,759 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,253.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(3,759) TOTAL UNITS: 3 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $1,255 per application July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE TIME EXTENSION REVIEW REFERENCE NO. S -049 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 3 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 4.50 $498.33 3 $1,495 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 2.50 $173.28 3 $520 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 2.50 $581.30 3 $1,744 TYPE SUBTOTAL 9.50 $1,252.91 $3,759 TOTALS 9.50 $1,253.00 $3,759 1 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION S -050 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPEAL Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review, report on, publish, and perform staff work for an appeal of a City staff decision to the Planning Commission. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Resident - $50 Non - Resident: $170 per application - SFR < 10 units $170 per application - MFR <= 6 units $235 per application - SFR >= 10 units $235 per application - MFR > 6 units $235 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $460 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $235.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $235 UNIT COST: $2,199.00 TOTAL COST: $2,199 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,964.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,964) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 10.69% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 50% Resident - $1,100 per appeal for 50% cost recovery Non - Resident - $2,200 per appeal for 100% cost recovery July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION S -050 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 9.00 $996.66 1 $997 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 4.00 $277.24 1 $277 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.50 $130.12 1 $130 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.42 $795.22 1 $795 TYPE SUBTOTAL 16.92 $2,199.24 $2,199 TOTALS 16.92 $2,199.00 $2,199 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL S -051 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPEAL Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review, report on, publish, and perform staff wok on an appeal of a Planning Commission decision to the City Council, CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Resident - $50 Non - Resident: $170 per application - SFR < 10 units $170 per application - MFR <= 6 units $235 per application - SFR >= 10 units $235 per application - MFR > 6 units $235 per application - Commercial/Industrial < 15,000 square feet $460 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $235.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $235 UNIT COST: $3,098.00 TOTAL COST: $3,098 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,863.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,863) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 7.59% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 50% Resident - $1,550 per appeal for 50% cost recovery Non - Resident - $3,100 per appeal for 100% cost recovery Inside the Coastal Appeal Zone - No Charge per State law July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL S -051 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS 4.00 $277.24 1 0.50 $130.12 1 4.42 $1,027.74 1 10.00 $1,663.20 1 TYPE SUBTOTAL 18.92 $3,098.30 TOTALS 18.92 $3,098.00 1 TOTAL COS $277 $130 $1,028 $1,663 $3,098 July 18, 2008 $3,098 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. STREET ADDRESS CHANGE S -052 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Processing a request for a street address on an existing parcel. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $546.00 TOTAL COST: $546 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(546.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(546) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $545 per application July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. STREET ADDRESS CHANGE S -052 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST INFORMATION SYST. GIS SPECIALIST 2.00 $204.60 1 $205 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II 0.50 $34.66 1 $35 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.50 $116.26 1 $116 BUILDING SAFETY BUILDING SAFETY DIR. 1.00 $190.10 1 $190 TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.00 $545.62 $546 TOTALS 4.00 $546.00 $546 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE S -053 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING PERMIT Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Maintenance and update of the General Plan. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $32.89 TOTAL COST: $99,986 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(32.89) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(99,986) TOTAL UNITS: 3,040 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% 10% of all Building & Safety permit fees July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE S-053 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 3,040 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING $1 Mil Over 10 Years 0.00 $32.89 3,040 $99,986 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $32.89 $99,986 TOTALS 0.00 $32.89 $99,9861 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. TEMPORARY USE PERMIT S -054 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Comm Group /Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a request for a temporary use of a site, such as holiday lots, special events, carnivals, and construction trailers, to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $746.46 TOTAL COST: $37,323 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(746.46) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(37,323) TOTAL UNITS: 50 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $745 per application July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. TEMPORARY USE PERMIT S -054 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 50 DEPARTMENT POSITION PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO STREET SERVICES STREET MAINT SUPERVISOR POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT FIRE SUPPRESSION FIRE BATTALION CHIEF TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS 3.50 $387.59 50 $19,380 0.50 $116.26 50 $5,813 0.25 $38.43 50 $1,922 0.50 $47.30 50 $2,365 0.50 $83.60 50 $4,180 0.50 $73.27 50 $3,664 TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.75 $746.45 $37,323 , TOTALS 5.75 $746.46 $37,3231 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT S -055 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Comm Group /Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a request for live music or dancing in the City to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $668.53 TOTAL COST: $10,028 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(668.53) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(10,028) TOTAL UNITS: 15 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $670 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT S -055 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 15 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 3.25 $359.91 15 $5,399 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST 11 0.83 $57.53 15 $863 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 1.08 $251.12 15 $3,767 TYPE SUBTOTAL TOTALS 5.16 $668.56 5.16 $668.53 July 18, 2008 $10,0281 $10,0281 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ADULT USE PLANNING PERMIT S -056 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of an adult use within the City to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $6,857.00 TOTAL COST: $6,857 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(6,857.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(6,857) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ADULT USE PLANNING PERMIT S -056 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST II PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 1.00 $110.74 1 $111 4.75 $329.22 1 $329 1.00 $260.23 1 $260 9.67 $2,248.47 1 $2,248 23.50 $3,908.52 1 $3,909 TYPE SUBTOTAL TOTALS 39.92 $6,857.18 39.92 $6,857.00 July 18, 2008 $6,857 1 $6,8571 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT S -057 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Developer /Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review a request for an event or project that uses amplified sound to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $110.75 TOTAL COST: $4,430 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $ (110.75) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(4,430) TOTAL UNITS: 40 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $110 per application July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT S -057 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 40 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 1.00 $110.74 40 $4,430 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $110.74 $4,430 TOTALS 1.00 $110.75 July 18, 2008 $4,430 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ANIMAL PERMIT S -058 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPLICATION Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a request to house more than the standard number of animals allowed by the Municipal Code. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $337.50 TOTAL COST: $675 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(337.50) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(675) TOTAL UNITS: 2 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $340 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ANIMAL PERMIT S -058 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 2 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 2.00 $221.48 2 $443 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.50 $116.26 2 $233 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.50 $337.74 $675 TOTALS 2.50 $337.50 $6751 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ANIMAL PERMIT RENEWAL S -059 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING RENEWAL Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Processing the annual renewal of an animal permit. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $169.00 TOTAL COST: $338 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(169.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(338) TOTAL UNITS: 2 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $170 per renewal July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ANIMAL. PERMIT RENEWAL S -059 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 2 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 1.00 $110.74 2 $221 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.25 $58.13 2 $116 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.25 $168.87 $338 TOTALS 1.25 $169.00 $338 i July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ANIMAL PERMIT APPEAL S -060 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING APPEAL Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of an appeal of a staff decision relating to an animal permit. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $25 per appeal REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $25.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $25 UNIT COST: $1,612.00 TOTAL COST: $1,612 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,587.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,587) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 1.55% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 50% Resident - $805 per appeal for 50% cost recovery Non - Resident - $1,610 per appeal for 100% cost recovery July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ANIMAL PERMIT APPEAL S -060 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST. PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 5.00 $553.70 1 $554 PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST 11 2.75 $190.60 1 $191 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.50 $130.12 1 $130 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.17 $737.09 1 $737 TYPE SUBTOTAL 11.42 $1,611.51 $1,612 TOTALS 11.42 $1,612.00 $1,612 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. BUSINESS ZONING CLEARANCE S -061 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING BUSINESS Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of the zoning of a proposed new business operating within the City. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $5 per application - SFR < 10 units $5 per application - MFR <= 6 units $5 per application - SFR >= 10 units $5 per application - MFR > 6 units $5 per application - Commercial /Industrial < 15,000 square feet $15 per application - Commercial /Industrial > 15,000 square feet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $5.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $3,175 UNIT COST: $57.99 TOTAL COST: $36,821 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(52.99) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(33,646) TOTAL UNITS: 635 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 8.62% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Home Occupation - $110 per application Other Businesses - $55 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. BUSINESS ZONING CLEARANCE S -061 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 635 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER Business 0.50 $55.37 605 $33,499 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50 $55.37 $33,499 PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER Home Occupation 1.00 $110.74 30 $3,322 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $110.74 $3,322 TOTALS 1.50 $57.99 $36,821 1 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PUBLIC NOTICING S -062 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT PLANNING NOTICE Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Processing an advertisement in the newspaper where it is required by City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $120 per notice or deposit with actual costs, at the discretion of City staff. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT S -063 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING PERMIT Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of physical encroachments of private uses into the public right -of -way which require a site inspection. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Permit Issuance: $50 - Residential $140 - Non - Residential /Commercial Inspection: Sidewalk - $1 per linear foot with a minimum of $85 per location Street Curb /Curb Gutter - $1 per linear foot with a minimum of $85 per location Driveway - $85 without a depressed curb $140 with a depressed curb House Sewer Lateral Connection to Existing City Sewer Main - $225 House Sewer Connection to Existing Sewer Lateral - $145 Temporary Encroachment - $115 REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $186.30 TOTAL REVENUE: $8,570 UNIT COST: $123.52 TOTAL COST: $5,682 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $62.78 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $2,888 TOTAL UNITS: 46 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 150.83% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Permit Issuance: $30 Inspection: Sidewalk - $2 per linear foot with a minimum of $95 per location Street Curb /Curb Gutter - $2 per linear foot with a minimum of $95 per location Driveway - $95 House Sewer Lateral Connection to Existing City Sewer Main - $95 House Sewer Connection to Existing Sewer Lateral - $45 Temporary Encroachment - $95 plus performance bond at a level determined by City staff July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT S -063 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 46 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS ENGINEERING ENGINEERING TECH. 0.33 $30.33 46 $1,395 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.33 $30.33 $1,395 ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Sewer Lat Connect 1.00 $94.22 1 $94 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $94.22 $94 ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Sewer Connect To Lat 0.50 $47.11 1 $47 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50 $4711 $47 ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Other 1.00 $94.22 44 $4,146 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $94.22 $4,146 TOTALS 2.83 $123.52 $5,682 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. EXCAVATION PERMIT S -064 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING PERMIT Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of an excavation into the public right -of -way which requires a site inspection. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Permit Issuance: Residential - $50 Non - Residential /Commercial - $140 Inspection - $0.50 per linear foot of excavation or trench with a minimum of $50 REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $145.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $9,570 UNIT COST: $171.67 TOTAL COST: $11,330 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(26.67) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,760) TOTAL UNITS: 66 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 84.47% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Permit Issuance - $30 Inspection - $2.85 per linear foot of excavation or trench with a minimum of $140 Plan Check - $300 plus performance bond at a level determined by City staff July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. EXCAVATION PERMIT S -064 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 66 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ENGINEERING ENGINEERING TECH. 0.33 $30.33 66 $2,002 ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Per 50 Lin Feet 1.50 $141.33 66 $9,328 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.83 $171.66 $11,330 TOTALS 1.83 $171.67 $11,3301 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. UTILITY STREET CUT PERMIT S -065 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING PERMIT Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of street cuts into the public right -of -way by a private utility company which require a site inspection. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Permit Issuance - $140 Inspection - $.50 per linear foot of trench with a minimum of $50 per location Annual Permit for routine maintenance work - $2,000 per year REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $190.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $18,240 UNIT COST: $299.74 TOTAL COST: $28,775 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(109.74) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(10,535) TOTAL UNITS: 96 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 63.39% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Permit Issuance - $30 Inspection - $2.85 per linear foot of excavation or trench with a minimum of $140 Plan Check - $300 plus performance bond at a level determined by City staff July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. UTILITY STREET CUT PERMIT S -065 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 96 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ENGINEERING ENGINEERING TECH. 0.33 $30.33 96 $2,912 ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 1.50 $141.33 96 $13,568 TYPE SUBTOTAL ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO Plan Review TYPE SUBTOTAL TOTALS 1.83 $171.66 2.00 $307.40 2.00 $307.40 3.83 $299.74 $16,479 40 $12,296 $12,296 $28,775 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT S -066 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING AGREEMENT Developer/Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of an agreement to grant a encroachemnt license into the future. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT S -066 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS— ENGINEERING ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18, 2008 $0 I CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. STREET CLOSURE REVIEW S -067 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING APPLICATION Developer /Comm Group /Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a request to temporarily close a City Street for such things as a bolck party or a development - related closure. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $216.00 TOTAL COST: $216 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(216.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(216) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $215 per application July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. STREET CLOSURE REVIEW S -067 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOC 0.50 $55.10 1 $55 ENGINEERING ENGINEERING TECH. 0.33 $30.33 1 $30 STREET SERVICES STREET MAINT SUPERVISOR 0.50 $47.30 1 $47 POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT 0.50 $83.60 1 $84 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.83 $216.33 $216 TOTALS 1.83 $216.00 $216 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. NEWSRACK PERMIT S -068 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING NEWSRACK Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a new newsrack to insure that the site and placement of the newsrack is appropriate under City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $50 per newsrack per year REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $50.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $50 UNIT COST: $106.00 TOTAL COST: $106 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(56.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY). $(56) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 47.17% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% New - $105 per newsrack Annual Renewal - $50 per newsrack July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. NEWSRACK PERMIT S -068 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ENGINEERING ENGINEERING TECH. 0.50 $45.96 1 $46 ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 0.33 $31.09 1 $31 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 0.17 $29.44 1 $29 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $106.49 $106 TOTALS 1.00 $106.00 July 18. 2008 $106 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. NEWSRACK IMPOUNDMENT S -069 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING NEWSRACK Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Impoundment of an improperly placed or non - permitted newsrack. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Impoundment - $60 per newsrack Release - $45 per newsrack + $5 per day for storage REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $105.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $105 UNIT COST: $90.00 TOTAL COST: $90 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $15.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $15 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 116.67% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $90 per newsrack + $5 per day for storage July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FINAL PARCEL MAP CHECK S -070 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING MAP Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a final parcel map of one to four lots for conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $70 per map REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $70.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $420 UNIT COST: $667.17 TOTAL COST: $4,003 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(597.17) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(3,583) TOTAL UNITS: 6 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 10.49% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $665 per map (Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by the applicant) July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FINAL PARCEL MAP CHECK S -070 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 6 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS. PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER 3.00 $332.22 6 $1.993 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.25 $65.06 6 $390 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.50 $116.26 6 $698 ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO Plus County 1.00 $153.70 6 $922 TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.75 $667.24 $4,003 TOTALS 4.75 $667.17 $4,003 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FINAL TRACT MAP PLAN CHECK S -071 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING MAP Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a final tract map of 5 or more lots for conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $70 per map REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $70.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $280 UNIT COST: $1,565.50 TOTAL COST: $6,262 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,495.50) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(5,982) TOTAL UNITS: 4 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 4.47% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $1,565 per map (Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by the applicant) July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FINAL TRACT MAP PLAN CHECK S -079 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 4 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI 0.25 $65.06 4 $260 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 1.50 $348.78 4 $1,395 PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER 6.00 $997.92 4 $3,992 ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO Plus County 1.00 $153.70 4 $615 TYPE SUBTOTAL 8.75 $1,565.46 $6,262 TOTALS 8.75 $1,565.50 $6,262 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FINAL MAP AMENDMENT S -072 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a proposed amendment to an already approved and recorded final parcel or tract map. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $154.00 TOTAL COST: $154 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(154.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(154) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $155 per application (Any County procesing fees are paid directly to the County by the applicant) July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FINAL MAP AMENDMENT S -072 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO Plus County 1.00 $153.70 1 $154 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $153.70 $154 TOTALS 1.00 $154.00 July 18, 2008 $154 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK S -073 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING PLAN Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of the plans for any addition to the City's infrastructure by a private party. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $70 per sheet REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $1,400.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $11,200 UNIT COST: $4,013.75 TOTAL COST: $32,110 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,613.75) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(20,910) TOTAL UNITS: 8 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 34.88% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Percent of Construction Valuation: $0- $100,000 - 3% $100,001 - $500,000 - 2% of the construction value over $100,000 $500,001 + - 1 % of the construction value over $500,000 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK S -073 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 8 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS'r ENGINEERING ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER <$100k 16.00 $3,058.08 2 $6,116 TYPE SUBTOTAL 16.00 $3,058.08 $6,116 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER $100k - $500k 19.00 $3,631.47 2 $7,263 TYPE SUBTOTAL 19.00 $3,631.47 $7,263 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER $500k - $1 Mil 23.00 $4,395.99 2 $8,792 TYPE SUBTOTAL 23.00 $4,395.99 $8,792 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER $1 Mil+ 26.00 $4,969.38 2 $9,939 TYPE SUBTOTAL 26.00 $4,969.38 $9,939 TOTALS 84.00 $4,013.75 July 18, 2008 $32,110 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION S -074 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING PROJECT Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Inspection of any additions to the Citys infrastructure by a private party. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $1,884.38 TOTAL COST: $15,075 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,884.38) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(15,075) TOTAL UNITS: 8 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Percent of Construction Valuation: $04100,000 - 1.5% $100,001 4500,000 - 1% of the construction value over $100,000 $500,001+ - 0.5% of the construction value over $500,000 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION S -074 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 8 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 20.00 $1,884.40 8 $15,075 TYPE SUBTOTAL 20.00 $1,884.40 $15,075 TOTALS 20.00 $1,884.38 $15,075 1 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION ISSUANCE S -075 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of corrections to a recorded parcel or tract map. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $1,502.67 TOTAL COST: $4,508 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,502.67) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(4,508) TOTAL UNITS: 3 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $1,505 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION ISSUANCE S -075 NOTE TOTAL. UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 3 DEPARTMENT POSITION PLANNING ASSISTANT PLANNER PLANNING OFFICE SPECIALIST 11 PLANNING PLANNING & BLDG SAFETY DI PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 3.00 $332.22 3 $997 0.67 $46.44 3 $139 0.17 $44.24 3 $133 2.00 $465.04 3 $1.395 4.00 $614.80 3 $1,844 TYPE SUBTOTAL TOTALS 9.84 $1,502.74 9.84 $1,502.67 July 18, 2008 $4,5081 $4,5081 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. RECORD OF SURVEY PLAN CHECK S -076 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING PLAN Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review a record of survey plan submitted through the County to insure that it meets all appropriate City requirements. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $1,529.00 TOTAL COST: $3,058 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,529.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(3,058) TOTAL UNITS: 2 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $1,530 per plan July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL_ WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. RECORD OF SURVEY PLAN CHECK S -076 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE ENGINEERING ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER Plus County I TYPE SUBTOTAL TOTALS 2 UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS 8.00 $1,529.04 2 $3,058 8.00 $1,529.04 $3,058 8.00 $1,529.00 July 18, 2008 $3,058 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. EASEMENT PROCESSING S -077 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of the creation of a new easement for dedication and recordation purposes. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. EASEMENT PROCESSING S -077 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS ENGINEERING ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 0.00 $0.00 July 18. 2008 $0 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. QUITCLAIM REVIEW S -078 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING APPLICATION Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a quitclaim of City rights to a property on request of a private party. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $307.00 TOTAL COST: $307 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(307.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(307) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $305 per application July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. QUITCLAIM REVIEW S -078 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO 2.00 $307.40 1 $307 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.00 $307.40 $307 TOTALS 2.00 $307.00 July 18, 2008 $307 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SURETY & SUBORDINATION REVIEW S -079 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING MAP /LOT Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of the adequacy of the existing warranty to modify sureties or subordinate bonds or liens guaranteeing the installation of public improvemetns to City requirements and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $1,911.25 TOTAL COST: $15,290 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,911.25) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(15,290) TOTAL UNITS: 8 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100 0/6 $1,910 per map /lot July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SURETY & SUBORDINATION REVIEW S -079 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 8 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS ENGINEERING ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER 10.00 $1,911.30 8 $15,290 TYPE SUBTOTAL 10.00 $1,911.30 $15,290 TOTALS 10.00 $1,911.25 $15,290 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. LIEN REMOVAL S -080 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING LIEN Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Removal of a lien on a parcel on request. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $154.00 TOTAL COST: $154 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(154.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(154) TOTAL UNITS. 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $155 per lien July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. LIEN REMOVAL S -080 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO 1.00 $153.70 1 $154 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $153.70 $154 TOTALS 1.00 $154.00 $1541 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEW S -081 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING STUDY Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of a drainage study to determine compliance with City codes and standards, as well as NPDES requirements. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $461.00 TOTAL COST: $461 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(461.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(461) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Minor - $460 Major - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEW S -081 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO Deposit It Larger 3.00 $461.10 1 $461 TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.00 $461.10 $461 TOTALS 3.00 $461.00 July 18. 2008 $461 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. STOCKPILE /BORROW SITE PLAN CHECK S -082 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT ENGINEERING PLAN Developer DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of the plan of a stockpile operation which stockpiles, removes, or borrows earth on a temporary basis. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $338.00 TOTAL COST: $338 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(338.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(338) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $340 per plan July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FIRE ALARM PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION S -099 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 646 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS FIRE PREVENTION FIRE MARSHAL Plan Check 1.00 $194.26 156 $30,305 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $194.26 $30,305 FIRE PREVENTION FIRE MARSHAL New - Inspection 1.50 $291.39 100 $29,139 FIRE PREVENTION FIRE PREVENTION SPEC. T.I.- Inspection 1.00 $125.90 390 $49,101 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.50 $417.29 $78,240 TOTALS 3.50 $168.03 $108,5451 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM PC /INSP S -100 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE PREVENTION PLAN Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Plan review and inspection of new fire extinguishing systems to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Valuation based on Tables in Appendix B of this Report REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE. $121.96 TOTAL REVENUE: $9,513 UNIT COST: $146.94 TOTAL COST: $11,461 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(24.98) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,948) TOTAL UNITS: 78 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 83.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Valuation based on Tables in Appendix B of this Report These revenues should be in separate revenue accounts. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM PCIINSP S -100 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 78 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS FIRE PREVENTION FIRE MARSHAL Plan Check 1.00 $194.26 24 $4,662 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $194.26 $4,662 FIRE PREVENTION FIRE PREVENTION SPEC. Inspection 1.00 $125.90 54 $6,799 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $125.90 $6,799 TOTALS 2.00 $146.94 $11,461 1 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FIRE PROTECTION TESTING S -101 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review and inspection of an occupancy's existing fire protection systems on a five year time frame to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $220 per system REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $220.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $8,800 UNIT COST: $462.15 TOTAL COST: $18,486 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(242.15) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(9,686) TOTAL UNITS: 40 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 47.60% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $465 per system July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FIRE PROTECTION TESTING S -101 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 40 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE FIRE PREVENTION FIRE PREVENTION SPEC. Time Per System FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ADMIN SPECIALIST TYPE SUBTOTAL TOTALS UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS 3.50 $440.65 40 $17,626 0.25 $21.51 40 $860 3.75 $462.16 $18,4861 3.75 $462.15 $18,4861 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. STATE MANDATED FIRE INSPECTION S -102 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION Business /Public Agency DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Inspection of fire hazards that are required by the State Fire Marshal. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $125.90 TOTAL COST: $1,259 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(125.90) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,259) TOTAL UNITS: 10 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $125 per inspection July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. STATE MANDATED FIRE INSPECTION S -102 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 10 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS FIRE PREVENTION FIRE PREVENTION SPEC. 1.00 $125.90 10 $1,259 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $125.90 $1,259 TOTALS 1.00 $125.90 $1,2591 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SPECIAL FIRE EQUIP INSP /APPROVAL S -103 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE PREVENTION REQUEST Developer /Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of new fire protection equipment on request. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $777.00 TOTAL COST: $777 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(777.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(777) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $775 per request plus any outside costs July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. SPECIAL FIRE EQUIP INSP /APPROVAL S -103 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 1 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS FIRE PREVENTION FIRE MARSHAL 4.00 $777.04 1 $777 TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.00 $777.04 $777 TOTALS 4.00 $777.00 July 18. 2008 $777 1 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSP. PROGRAM S -104 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE ENVIRON SAFETY BUSINESS Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review and inspection of occupancies every three years which store hazardous materials to determine compliance with City and State codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Range I - $112 Range II - $256 Range III - $506 Range IV - $1,177 Range V - $1,342 REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $344.04 TOTAL REVENUE: $69,496 UNIT COST: $1,148.56 TOTAL COST: $232,010 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(804.52) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(162,514) TOTAL UNITS: 202 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 29.95% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Range I - $955 Range II - $1,070 Range III - $1,410 Range IV - $1,640 Range V - $1,755 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSP. PROGRAM REFERENCE NO. S -104 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 202 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL CO FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ADMIN SPECIALIST 27 H/Y Send Letters 0.13 $11.50 202 $2,323 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ADMIN SPECIALIST 2/3 Of 3 Mo Data Ent 1.38 $118.82 202 $24,002 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ADMIN SPECIALIST 33% Of 1 Mo FollowUp 0.23 $19.59 202 $3,957 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 4 D/M 3 Mo Follow -Up 0.53 $121.94 202 $24,632 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.28 $271.85 $54,914 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Range 1 3.00 $684.21 100 $68,421 TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.00 $684.21 $68,421 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Range II 3.50 $798.25 39 $31,132 TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.50 $798.25 $31,132 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Range III 5.00 $1,140.35 39 $44,474 TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.00 $1,140.35 $44,474 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Range IV 6.00 $1,368.42 22 $30,105 TYPE SUBTOTAL 6.00 $1,368.42 $30,105 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Range V 6.50 $1,482.46 2 $2,965 TYPE SUBTOTAL 6.50 $1,482.46 $2,965 TOTALS 26.28 $1,148.56 $232,010 1 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. CHEMICAL ACCIDENT RELEASE PREV PROG S -105 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE ENVIRON SAFETY BUSINESS Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of an occupancy's chemical accident release prevention program on an every three year basis to determine compliance with City and State codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE 100 -1,000 Pounds: 1 chemical - $250 2 chemicals - $500 3+ chemicals - $1,000 1,000- 10,000 Pounds: 1 chemical - $500 2 chemicals - $1,000 3+ chemicals - $2,000 10,000+ Pounds: 1 chemical - $1,500 2 chemicals - $3,000 3+ chemicals - $6,000 REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $1,750.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $15,750 UNIT COST: $2,445.44 TOTAL COST: $22,009 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(695.44) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(6,259) TOTAL UNITS: 9 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 71.56% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100 %. 100 -1,000 Pounds: 1 chemical - $1,370 2 chemicals - $1,825 3+ chemicals - $2,280 1,000- 10,000 Pounds: 1 chemical - $1,480 2 chemicals - $2,055 3+ chemicals - $2,735 10,000+ Pounds: 1 chemical - $2,055 2 chemicals - $3,195 3+ chemicals - $5,020 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE CHEMICAL ACCIDENT RELEASE PREV PROG REFERENCE NO. S -105 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 9 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 100 -1K Lb 1 Chem 6.00 $1,368.42 1 $1,368 TYPE SUBTOTAL 6.00 $1,368.42 $1,368 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 100 -1k Lb 2 Chem 8.00 $1,824.56 1 $1,825 TYPE SUBTOTAL 8.00 $1,824.56 $1,825 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 100 -1k Lb 3+ Chem 10.00 $2,280.70 1 $2,281 TYPE SUBTOTAL 10.00 $2,280.70 $2,281 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 1k -10k Lb 1 Chem 6.50 $1,482.46 1 $1,482 TYPE SUBTOTAL 6.50 $1,482.46 $1,482 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 1k -10k Lb 2 Chem 9.00 $2,052.63 1 $2,053 TYPE SUBTOTAL 9.00 $2,052.63 $2,053 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 1k -10k Lb 3+ Chem 12.00 $2,736.84 1 $2,737 TYPE SUBTOTAL 12.00 $2,736.84 $2,737 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 10k+ Lb 1 Chem 9.00 $2,052.63 1 $2.053 TYPE SUBTOTAL 9.00 $2,052.63 $2,053 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 10k+ Lb 2 Chem 14.00 $3,192.98 1 $3.193 TYPE SUBTOTAL 14.00 $3,192.98 $3,193 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 10k+ Lb 3+ Chem 22.00 $5,017.54 1 $5,018 TYPE SUBTOTAL 22.00 $5,017.54 $5,018 TOTALS 96.50 $2,445.44 July 18, 2008 $22,009 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR PERMIT S -106 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE ENVIRON SAFETY PERMIT Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review and inspection of hazardous waste generators every three years within the City to determine compliance with City and State codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Silver /Universal Waste Only Generator - $109 0 -5 employees - $381 Small) (6 -19 employees) - $412 Intermediate (20 -100 employees) - $564 Advanced (101 -500 employees) - $740 Complex (501+ employees) - $1,257 Permit By Rule - $1,012 Conditional Authorization - $747 Conditionally Exempt - $109 REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $426.07 TOTAL REVENUE: $37,494 UNIT COST: $1,076.85 TOTAL COST: $94,763 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(650.78) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(57,269) TOTAL UNITS: 88 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 39.57% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Silver /Universal Waste Only Generator - $230 1 -5 employees - $515 Small) (6 -19 employees) - $910 Intermediate (20 -100 employees) - $1,480 Advanced (101 -500 employees) - $1,940 Complex (501+ employees) - $2,625 Permit By Rule - $1,940 Conditional Authorization - $1,140 Conditionally Exempt - $910 Large Quantity Generator - $910 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR PERMIT REFERENCE NO. S -106 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 88 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNII-, COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Silver/Waste Only 1.00 $228.07 1 $228 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $228.07 $228 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 1 -5 Employees 2.25 $513.16 8 $4,105 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.25 $513.16 $4,105 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 6 -19 Employees 4.00 $912.28 45 $41,053 I TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.00 $912.28 $41,053 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 20 -100 Employees 6.50 $1,482.46 8 $11,860 TYPE SUBTOTAL 6.50 $1,482.46 $11,860 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 101 -500 Employees 8.50 $1,938.60 2 $3,877 TYPE SUBTOTAL 8.50 $1,938.60 $3,877 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 500+ Employees 11.50 $2,622.81 6 $15,737 TYPE SUBTOTAL 11.50 $2,622.81 $15,737 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Permit By Rule 8.50 $1,938.60 1 $1,939 TYPE SUBTOTAL 8.50 $1,938.60 $1,939 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Conditional Auth. 5.00 $1,140.35 2 $2,281 TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.00 $1,140.35 $2,281 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Conditional Exempt 4.00 $912.28 1 $912 TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.00 $912.28 $912 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Lge Quantity Gen 4.00 $912.28 14 $12,772 July 18, 2008 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK The costs shown on the facing page are a continued listing of costs listed on the page immediately preceding. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR PERMIT S -106 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 88 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.00 $912.28 ;12,772 TOTALS 55.25 $1,076.85 July 18, 2008 $94,7631 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. NEW INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT /INSPECT S -107 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE ENVIRON SAFETY PERMIT Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review and inspection of new industrial waste uses within the City to determine compliance with City and State codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE New Permit Application: Sewer - $219 Off -Site - $323 On -Site - $342 New Sewer Plan: 1 - $331 2 - $414 3 - $519 4 - $572 5 - $837 6 - $1,074 New On -Site Plan: 1 - $448 2 - $560 3 - $715 4 - $793 5 - $1,168 6 - 1,510 New Off -Site Plan: 1 - $361 2 - $444 3 - $560 4 - $619 5 - $915 6 - $1,174 Closure Inspection - $114 Wastewater Sampling - $170 Site Remediation - Actual Costs Special Inspection and Off -Hours Inspection - Actual Costs Additional Plan Review - Actual Costs REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $540.43 TOTAL REVENUE: $7,566 UNIT COST: $897.00 TOTAL COST: $12,558 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(356.57) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(4,992) TOTAL UNITS: 14 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 60.25% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% New Permit Application: Sewer - $480 Off -Site - $480 On -Site - $935 New Sewer Plan: 1/2 - $570 314 - $800 5/6 - $1,255 New On -Site Plan: 1/2 - $725 3/4 - $1,010 5/6 - $1,580 New Off -Site Plan: 1/2 - $625 3/4 - $875 5/6 - $1,370 Closure Inspection - $1,185 Wastewater Sampling - $685 plus actual lab costs Site Remediation - Actual Costs Special Inspection and Off -Hours Inspection - Actual Costs Additional Plan Review - Actual Costs July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE NEW INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT /INSPECT REFERENCE NO. S -107 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 14 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ADMIN SPECIALIST New Sewer 0.25 $21.51 1 $22 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New Sewer 2.00 $456.14 1 $456 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.25 $477.65 $478 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ADMIN SPECIALIST New Off -Site 0.25 $21.51 1 $22 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New Off -Site 2.00 $456.14 1 $456 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.25 $477.65 $478 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ADMIN SPECIALIST New On -Site 0.25 $21.51 1 $22 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New On -Site 4.00 $912.28 1 $912 TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.25 $933.79 $934 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New Sewer PC 1/2 2.50 $570.18 1 $570 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.50 $570.18 $570 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New Sewer PC 3/4 3.50 $798.25 1 $798 TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.50 $798.25 $798 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New Sewer PC 5/6 5.50 $1,254.39 1 $1.254 TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.50 $1,254.39 $1,254 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New On -Site PC 112 3.17 $722.98 1 $723 TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.17 $722.98 $723 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New On -Site PC 3/4 4.42 $1,008.07 1 $1,008 TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.42 $1,008.07 $1,008 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New On -Site PC 5/6 6.92 $1,578.24 1 $1,578 TYPE SUBTOTAL 6.92 $1,578.24 $1,578 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New Off -Site PC 112 2.75 $627.19 1 $627 July 18, 2008 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK The costs shown on the facing page are a continued listing of costs listed on the page immediately preceding. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE NEW INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT /INSPECT REFERENCE NO. S -107 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 14 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.75 $627.19 $627 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New Off -Site PC 3/4 3.83 $873.51 1 $874 TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.83 $873.51 $874 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New Off -Site PC 5/6 6.00 $1,368.42 1 $1,368 TYPE SUBTOTAL 6.00 $1,368.42 $1,368 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ADMIN SPECIALIST Closure Inspection 0.50 $43.02 1 $43 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Closure Inspection 5.00 $1,140.35 1 $1,140 TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.50 $1,183.37 $1,183 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Wastewater Sampling 3.00 $684.21 1 $684 TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.00 $684.21 $684 TOTALS 55.84 $897.00 $12,558 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. REVISED INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT /INS S -108 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE ENVIRON SAFETY PERMIT Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review and inspection of revisions to new industrial waste uses within the City to determine compliance with City and State codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Revise Permit Application: Sewer - $143 Off -Site - $195 On -Site - $206 Revise Sewer Plan: 1 - $258 2 - $317 3 - $400 4 - $444 5 - $644 6 - $825 Revise On -Site Plan: 1 - $348 2 - $431 3 - $548 4 - $607 5 - $902 6 - $1,162 Revise Off -Site Plan: 1 - $258 2 - $317 3 - $400 4 - $444 5 - $644 6 - $825 REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $440.20 TOTAL REVENUE: $4,402 UNIT COST: $671.40 TOTAL COST: $6,714 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(231.20) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,312) TOTAL UNITS: 10 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 65.56% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Revise Permit Application - $230 Revise Sewer Plan: 112 - $440 3/4 - $610 5/6 - $950 Revise On -Site Plan: 1/2 - $550 3/4 - $760 516 - $1,180 Revise Off -Site Plan: 1/2 - $440 3/4 - $610 5/6 - $950 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REVISED INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT /INS REFERENCE NO. S -108 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 10 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Permit Revision 1.00 $228.07 1 $22B TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $228.07 $228 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Sewer Plan Revis 112 1.92 $437.89 1 $438 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.92 $437.89 $438 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Sewer Plan Revis 3/4 2.67 $608.95 1 $609 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.67 $608.95 $609 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Sewer Plan Revis 5/6 4.17 $951.05 1 $951 TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.17 $951.05 $951 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER On -Site PI Revis 112 2.42 $551.93 1 $552 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.42 $551.93 $552 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER On -Site PI Revis 3/4 3.33 $759.47 1 $759 TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.33 $759.47 $759 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER On -Site PI Revis 5/6 5.17 $1.179.12 1 $1,179 TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.17 $1,179.12 $1,179 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Off -Site PI Rvis 1/2 1.92 $437.89 1 $438 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.92 $437.89 $438 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Off -Site PI Rvis 3/4 2.67 $608.95 1 $609 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.67 $608.95 $609 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Off-Site PI Rvis 5/6 4.17 $951.05 1 $951 July 18. 2008 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK The costs shown on the facing page are a continued listing of costs listed on the page immediately preceding. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. INDUSTRIAL WASTE ANNUAL INSPECTION S -109 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE ENVIRON SAFETY INSPECTION Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review and annual inspection of existing industrial waste users within the City in compliance with NPDES permit requirements. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Class 1 - $114 Class 2 - $227 Class 3 - $340 Class 4 - $453 Class 5 - $681 Class 12 - $1,359 Class X - $170 UNIT REVENUE: $354.78 TOTAL REVENUE: $12,772 UNIT COST: $1,425.44 TOTAL COST: $51,316 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,070.66) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(38,544) TOTAL UNITS: 36 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 24.89% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Class 1 - $455 Class 2 - $910 Class 3 - $1,370 Class 4 - $1,825 Class 5 - $2,735 Class 12 - $5,475 Class X - $685 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ANNUAL INSPECTION REFERENCE NO. S -109 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 36 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Class 1 2.00 $456.14 18 $8,211 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.00 $456.14 $8,211 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Class 2 4.00 $912.28 1 $912 TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.00 $912.28 $912 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Class 3 6.00 $1.368.42 3 $4,105 TYPE SUBTOTAL 6.00 $1,368.42 $4,105 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Class 4 8.00 $1,824.56 1 $1,825 TYPE SUBTOTAL 8.00 $1,824.56 $1,825 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Class 5 12.00 $2,736.84 11 $30,105 TYPE SUBTOTAL 12.00 $2,736.84 $30,105 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Class 12 24.00 $5,473.68 1 $5,474 TYPE SUBTOTAL 24.00 $5,473.68 $5,474 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Class X 3.00 $684.21 1 $684 TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.00 $684.21 $684 TOTALS 59.00 $1,425.44 $51,316 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. UNDERGROUND TANK PERMIT S -110 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE ENVIRON SAFETY PERMIT Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review and inspection of the installation and removal of underground storage tanks to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Annual Permit Maintenance - $570 plus $30 for each additional tank Operating Permit Transfer - $85 New Construction Plan Clearance - $725 plus $275 for each additional tank Closure Application - $725 plus $310 for each additional tank Complex Site Investigation - $1,200 Permit Addendum - $85 Voluntary Cleanup Oversight - $75 per hour Secondary Containment Testing Oversight - $460 plus $220 for each additional tank REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $409.64 TOTAL REVENUE: $22,940 UNIT COST: $897.09 TOTAL COST: $50,237 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(487.45) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(27,297) TOTAL UNITS: 56 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 45.66% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Annual Permit Maintenance - $1,190 plus $115 for each add'I tank Operating Permit Transfer - $725 New Construction Plan Clearance - $1,140 Closure Application - $2,095 plus $230 for each additional tank or deposit Complex Site Investigation - Deposit with actual costs Permit Addendum - $480 Voluntary Cleanup Oversight - Deposit with actual costs Secondary Containment Testing Oversight - $500 plus $570 for each tank plus $570 for each re- inspection per tank after the first 2 inspections July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE UNDERGROUND TANK PERMIT REFERENCE NO. S -110 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 56 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ADMIN SPECIALIST Annual Permit 20 H/Y 0.61 $52.14 33 $1,721 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Annual Permit 5.00 $1,140.35 33 $37,632 TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.61 $1,192.49 $39,352 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Ann Permit 2nd+ Tank 0.50 $114.04 12 $1,368 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50 $114.04 $1,368 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ADMIN SPECIALIST Sec Cont Test Permit 0.50 $43.02 4 $172 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Sec Cont Test Permit 2.00 $456.14 4 $1,825 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.50 $499.16 $1,997 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Sec Cont Test Tank 2.50 $570.18 4 $2,281 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.50 $570.18 $2,281 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Sec Cont Test Re -Ins 2.50 $570.18 1 $570 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.50 $570.18 $570 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ADMIN SPECIALIST Op Permit Transfer 0.50 $43.02 1 $43 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Op Permit Transfer 3.00 $684.21 1 $684 TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.50 $727.23 $727 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New Const Plan Clear 5.00 $1,140.35 1 $1,140 TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.00 $1,140.35 $1,140 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ADMIN SPECIALIST Closure - 1st Tank 0.50 $43.02 1 $43 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON SAFETY MANAGER Closure - 1st Tank 9.00 $2,052.63 1 $2,053 TYPE SUBTOTAL 9.50 $2,095.65 $2,096 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Closure Add'I Tank 1.00 $228.07 1 $228 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00 $228.07 $228 July 18, 2008 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK The costs shown on the facing page are a continued listing of costs listed on the page immediately preceding. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE UNDERGROUND TANK PERMIT REFERENCE NO. S -110 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 56 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSI FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ADMIN SPECIALIST Permit Addendum 0.25 $21.51 1 $22 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Permit Addendum 2.00 $456.14 1 $456 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.25 $477.65 $478 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Compl Site Inv - Dep 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Ovrsght Cleanup -Dep 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 TOTALS 34.86 $897.09 July 18, 2008 $50,237 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. ABOVE GROUND LIQUID TANK INSPECTION S -111 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE ENVIRON SAFETY TANK Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review and inspection of above ground liquid storage tanks to determine compliance with City and State codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE 0- 10,000 gallons - $100 per facility 10,001- 100,000 gallons - $200 per facility 100,001- 1,000,000 gallons - $400 per facility 1,000,001 - 10,000,000 gallons - $1,600 per facility 10,000,001 - 100,000,000 gallons - $8,000 per facility 100,000,001 or more gallons - $30,000 per facility REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $237.42 TOTAL REVENUE: $36,800 UNIT COST: $541.48 TOTAL COST: $83,930 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(304.06) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(47,130) TOTAL UNITS: 155 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 43.85% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% New: 0- 10,000 gallon - $1,370 10,001- 50,000 gallon - $2,280 50,001- 100,000 gallon - $2,735 100,000+ gallon - $3,650 Existing: 0- 10,000 gallon - $910 10,001- 50,000 gallon - $1,825 + $230 per tank after 1st tank 50,001- 100,000 gallon - $2,280 + $230 per tank after 1st tank 100,000+ gallon - $3,420 + $230 per tank after 1st tank Removal: 0- 10,000 gallon - $1,140 10,000+ gallon -Deposit with actual costs July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE ABOVE GROUND LIQUID TANK INSPECTION REFERENCE NO. S -111 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 155 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New <10k Gal 6.00 $1,368.42 1 $1,368 TYPE SUBTOTAL 6.00 $1,368.42 $1,368 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New 10k -50k Gal 10.00 $2,280.70 1 $2,281 TYPE SUBTOTAL 10.00 $2,280.70 $2,281 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New 50k -100k Gal 12.00 $2,736.84 1 $2,737 TYPE SUBTOTAL 12.00 $2,736.84 $2,737 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER New 100k+ Gal 16.00 $3,649.12 1 $3,649 TYPE SUBTOTAL 16.00 $3,649.12 $3,649 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Existing <IOk Gal 4.00 $912.28 14 $12,772 TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.00 $912.28 $12,772 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Existing 10k -50k Gal 8.00 $1,824.56 9 $16,421 TYPE SUBTOTAL 8.00 $1,824.56 $16,421 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Existing 50 -100k Gal 10.00 $2,280.70 1 $2,281 TYPE SUBTOTAL 10.00 $2,280.70 $2,281 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Existing 100k+ Gal 15.00 $3,421.05 4 $13,684 TYPE SUBTOTAL 15.00 $3,421.05 $13,684 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER Removal <10k Gal 5.00 $1,140.35 1 $1,140 TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.00 $1,140.35 $1,140 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON SAFETY MANAGER Remov 10k+ Hourly 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $0.00 $0 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON SAFETY MANAGER Existing Add'I Tank 1.00 $228.07 121 $21.596 July 18, 2008 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK The costs shown on the facing page are a continued listing of costs listed on the page immediately preceding. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. REVIEW OF RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN S -112 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE ENVIRON SAFETY APPLICATION Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review of the CALARP Risk Management Plan to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $58 per hour for all time spent REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $5,703.33 TOTAL REVENUE: $51,330 UNIT COST: $22,426.89 TOTAL COST: $201,842 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(16,723.56) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(150,512) TOTAL UNITS: 9 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 25.43% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. REVIEW OF RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN S -112 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 9 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 100 -1k Lb 1 Chem 22.50 $5,131.58 1 $5,132 TYPE SUBTOTAL 22.50 $5,131.58 $5,132 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 100 -1k Lb 2 Chem 37.50 $8,552.63 1 $8,553 TYPE SUBTOTAL 37.50 $8,552.63 $8,553 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 100 -1k Lb 3+ Chem 60.00 $13,684.20 1 $13,684 TYPE SUBTOTAL 60.00 $13,684.20 $13,684 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 1k -10k Lb 1 Chem 60.00 $13,684.20 1 $13,684 TYPE SUBTOTAL 60.00 $13,684.20 $13,684 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 1k -10k Lb 2 Chem 75.00 $17,105.25 1 $17,105 TYPE SUBTOTAL 75.00 $17,105.25 $17,105 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 1k -10k Lb 3+ Chem 90.00 $20,526.30 1 $20,526 TYPE SUBTOTAL 90.00 $20,526.30 $20,526 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 10k+ Lb 1 Chem 90.00 $20,526.30 1 $20,526 TYPE SUBTOTAL 90.00 $20,526.30 $20,526 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 10k+ Lb 2 Chem 150.00 $34,210.50 1 $34,211 TYPE SUBTOTAL 150.00 $34,210.50 $34,211 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY ENVIRON. SAFETY MANAGER 10k+ Lb 3+ Chem 300.00 $68,421.00 1 $68,421 TYPE SUBTOTAL 300.00 $68,421.00 $68,421 TOTALS 885.00 $22,426.89 $201,842 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FIRE STORMWATER INSPECTION S -113 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE ENVIRON SAFETY INSPECTION Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Inspection twice every 5 years of the storm water impacts of various occupancies to determine compliance with NPDES standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Restaurant - $45 Automotive - $45 1 Acre - $45 2 -5 Acres - $80 More than 5 Acres - $115 REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $48.27 TOTAL REVENUE: $6,710 UNIT COST: $174.53 TOTAL COST: $24,260 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(126.26) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(17,550) TOTAL UNITS: 139 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 27.66% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Restaurant - $165 Automotive - $165 1 Acre - $200 2 -5 Acres - $235 More than 5 Acres - $330 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE FIRE STORMWATER INSPECTION REFERENCE NO. S -113 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 139 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST FIRE ENVIR SAFETY CONTRACT EMPLOYEE Prog Admin - Balance 2.03 $73.66 139 $10,239 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.03 $73.66 $10,239 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY CONTRACT EMPLOYEE Restaurant 2.50 $90.93 100 $9,093 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.50 $90.93 $9,093 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY CONTRACT EMPLOYEE Automotive 2.50 $90.93 20 $1,819 TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.50 $90.93 $1,819 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY CONTRACT EMPLOYEE i Acre 3.50 $127.30 10 $1,273 TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.50 $127.30 $1,273 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY CONTRACT EMPLOYEE 2 -5 Acres 4.50 $163.67 5 $818 TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.50 $163.67 $818 FIRE ENVIR SAFETY CONTRACT EMPLOYEE 6+ Acres 7.00 $254.59 4 $1,018 TYPE SUBTOTAL 7.00 $254.59 $1,018 TOTALS 22.03 $174.53 $24,260 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE S -114 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE ENVIRON SAFETY RESPONSE Business /Non- Resident DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Response to a hazardous material spill in the public right -of -way. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Actual Costs UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST: $0 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0 TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. NEW CONSTR. FIRE RE- INSPECTION S -115 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION Developer /Resident/Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Re- inspection of new fire improvements or occpancies which are required due to the actions of the applicant of business. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $179.00 TOTAL COST: $179 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(179.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(179) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. AFTER -HOURS FIRE INSPECTION S -116 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Inspection of an occupancy which is necessary to be performed after -hours with a four hour minimum. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Actual Costs REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $525.00 TOTAL COST. $525 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(525.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(525) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside or contract costs. July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. NEW BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING S -117 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FINANCE APPLICATION Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Processing new business license applications. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $40.48 TOTAL COST: $44,447 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(40.48) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(44,447) TOTAL UNITS: 1,098 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $40 per application July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL PROCESSING S -118 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FINANCE RENEWAL Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Processing business license renewals and maintenance of the business license system. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $43.79 TOTAL COST: $295,495 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(43.79) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(295,495) TOTAL UNITS: 6,748 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $40 per renewal July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL PROCESSING S -118 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 6,748 DEPARTMENT POSITION BUSINESS SERVICES ACCOUNTS SPECIALIST It BUSINESS SERVICES BUSINESS SERVICES MGR BUSINESS SERVICES LICENSE PERMIT SPEC II BUSINESS SERVICES REVENUE INSPECTOR BUSINESS SERVICES $9.77 TYPE Remainder Of Time 60% Of 4 Months Remainder Of Time 90% Of 4 Months Contract Services TYPE SUBTOTAL TOTALS UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS' 0.23 $16.32 6,748 $110,127 0.05 $8.84 6,748 $59,652 0.12 $9.77 6,748 $65,928 0.07 $7.97 6,748 $53,782 0.00 $0.89 6,748 $6,006 0.48 $43.79 $295,495 0.48 $43.79 $295,495 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. FILM PERMIT PROCESSING S -119 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT FINANCE APPLICATION Business DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Review a request to film within the City to determine compliance with City codes and standards. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Permit Application Fee - $250 Business License Application Fee - $247 Revision'/Rider - $75 Public Right -of -Way Usage - $750 per day per location Police Personnel - $83 per hour + $5 per hour per vehicle Fire Personnel - $59 per hour + $5 per hour per vehicle Public Works Personnel - Actual Costs REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $356.33 TOTAL REVENUE: $26,725 UNIT COST: $486.89 TOTAL COST: $36,517 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(130.56) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(9,792) TOTAL UNITS: 75 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 73.19% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% Permit Application Fee - $640 Revision/Rider - $175 Public Right -of -Way Usage - $750 per day per location Police Personnel - Actual Costs Fire Personnel - Actual Costs Public Works Personnel - Actual Costs - _ .. - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- -- - - -- .July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE FILM PERMIT PROCESSING REFERENCE NO. S -119 NOTE TOTAL UNITS Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units 75 DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS" BUSINESS SERVICES BUSINESS SERVICES MGR 0.75 $134.09 50 $6,705 BUSINESS SERVICES LICENSE PERMIT SPEC II 2.25 $182.14 50 $9,107 INFORMATION SYST. GIS SPECIALIST 1.00 $102.30 50 $5,115 ENGINEERING SR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSO 0.50 $76.85 50 $3,843 POLICE ADMIN. POLICE SERGEANT 0.50 $83.60 50 $4,180 FIRE PREVENTION FIRE PREVENTION SPEC. 0.50 $62.95 50 $3,148 TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.50 $641.93 $32,097 BUSINESS SERVICES BUSINESS SERVICES MGR RevisioNRider 0.25 $44.70 25 $1,118 BUSINESS SERVICES LICENSE PERMIT SPEC 11 Revision/Rider 1.00 $80.95 25 $2,024 INFORMATION SYST. GIS SPECIALIST Revision /Rider 0.50 $51.15 25 $1,279 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.75 $176.80 $4,420 TOTALS 7.25 $486.89 $36,517 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. COPY SERVICE S -120 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SR ERVICE RECIPIENT CITY CLERK COPY esidenUNon- Resident DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Providing copies of various City documents requested by the public. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE First 6 pages - No Charge Each additional page - $0.15 UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: UNIT COST: $0.54 TOTAL COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(0.54) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: 500 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% First 5 copies - No Charge Each additional copy - $0.20 per copy PCT. COST RECOVERY: $0 $270 $(270) 0.00% July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION S -121 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT CITY CLERK DOCUMENT Resident/Non- Resident DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Certifying the authenticity of a City document on request CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 $3.05 $(3.05) TOTAL UNITS: 60 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $3 per document TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: $0 $183 $(183) .July 18, 2008 0.00% CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. VIDEO /AUDIO COPYING S -122 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT CITY CLERK TA- APE /DISK Resident/Non- Resident DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Providing video or audio copies of such records on request. CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE $15 per tape /disk REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $15.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $180 UNIT COST: $9.58 TOTAL COST: $115 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $10 per tape /disk $5.42 I TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $65 12 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 156.52% July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18, 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 SERVICE REFERENCE NO. INITIATIVE PROCESSING S -123 PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT CITY CLERK APPLICATION Resident DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE Processing a notice of intent with the elections official of the City to propose a City Initiative CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE None REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0 UNIT COST: $2,033.00 TOTAL COST: $2,033 UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,033.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2,033) TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100% $200 per application Fee is limited by State Law July 18. 2008 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO COST DETAIL WORKSHEET FY 2007 -2008 July 18, 2008 APPENDIX B BUILDING SAFETY DETAILED FEE RECOMMENDATIONS m W J W U U W J D 0 W 2 U U) wm O W W ZF-LL U W LL W Q 2' cn�w J � � tl z z O } J J U m m 0 W U O W d W O W a H Z fr LL U W' U w 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cn O o 0 0° o CO EA N CA O O O O �EANEO000 > � EfA EA r to O O N E!9 r O O O O > > ° O O > 0 0 0 0 0 L r o 0 0 0 o cUa 69 r °-00 O L 69 EA r O U L L EA r 0 d CU6 C0 9 U U 69 O CU N (Ci R1 L -Tr O d CU U O O ca N O w O � O c) O 0,2 'R + OD "t O O ac) _ N CO EA �� M 699 EA t + + EA ER + + + Can � O O O CO EA CV r OO 00 r O CO r r Cl) 69 � � CO U�l N Cfi 69 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N U') 0 0 0 0 EA N m o O O > U% 69 LO O O > d ld O O O 0 O >> d) > 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 L r 0 0 0 0 a CUO E9 r c:I ct O N L 69 69 r r 0 U L L EA G-J. r N w N U U N � W N lC{ l0 CLj t Q) a- w O O Lc) 6A O o - r+ O N O M LO Efi CO 4 CC') ER C) 64 Efi Cl) t EP) t t � CO C.,i N O to En Cn O O t N LO 6 O 9 M O r CA _ LO EA CO EA M [fl to Cl) (9 C O C O N C O c O 0 O N 0> C) f70 M co >oC) > m > °o o0_ ° ° °oO >o° -oOEon O O CO Cn r EPA 6? 0 CD w CD C) 69 fie d 64 N �i r 0 0 0 N' o 0 0 0 0 Z O O H En O O O (D C O N N O U') > 0 EA 69 EfA 69 69 to O m 'E 'E E E 'E E 'E E Qaaaaa a- c ccc ccc, W v v v Fn m m m m m m m m Fn W Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 oEO000OOo O60 N0000(70 ELAN 0000 - > - EA to LO O O y EA E9 r O O > > N 0 to o_ O O O > > O O > 0 0 0 0 0 L r o o 0 0 0 mtl9 -:000 N L 6a EA O U L L 60 ca r O CD U U .c L 69 N Ri CO U U O N N W CO L N O CU N U O O m VI It O C) O CT O O t O r ao �64�i °�C1 r.� O, 69 to N O o t + 6s ifl N r- o O t r Cp ~ ~ O Ln Cl) M h N CO N C,) EfA E9 M N CV E9 r r N ER O o 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o O O O O LO LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N LO Cl 0 0 0 69 - E:i N En O O O > 69 EA LO o O N i - 69 69 r. > N N - 69 0 0 0 0 >> i L 0 0 0 0 0 coo 69 _ r O O 0 a) L 6fA W. r O U L L E:i U9, r ON N M 0 U Vi r " N 0 CO M CLj Efi O L L N N N � O _O - - N O ELO O LO -O O u-, 4 N N to O �O ti ��H4� r N E9 E9 Eon co + Cn + + Ef9 CV C-4 N LO LO t ti r'- 6N O O CA � 9 N r Efi ME9 O COO Ge r EH C C O C O ;p C O Cc O O ca > > CO C 0 CC{ 7 > 3 ca > is O O> O O 3> Y MC)CDCCD ) 00 U >> o0 0 0 0 0 w o OOu) -o = O o O O r 69 60 o U C°n °-NER� o ?E»� OOOO A d C LO CV N CO O > Ur :D 69 EE9 EA EA 69 69 O Z U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U C C C C C C C C m CO ld R m CO m m CO Qaaaaaaaa- m w`o -6 vv_- _ -_`ov_ O 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 mmmmmmmmm W of m W J W 2 U U) W J 0 w 2 U U) w m O LL w } LL H LLJ H Q Cn Cn W J 06 d z z LL O p o U m m O W U O W W aLL O d. H z T W W LL D U W U W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °° O O O O O O °in 000000 4- N tC) 0 0 0 0 f to N to O O O > " 69 64 r O O O N - -to69r O O > > N N 69 O_ O O O > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L O O O O O 0 6i r r C7 C7 ° N L 6i 69 r ° O m U U L L 69 N CO N U U L COD O m m U Cl) 0 w o y e%I0tOo00 + 00 N 0 O V O ti 69 Co O N 69 r 69 + CO Ki tb ++ 0 N + 699 t` O N O O + 69 N Cn M N O O CD O M N fo6i � 69 CD to bi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° toOOOOOO ° 64 CN to O O O C '4 N69Nto000 > -ww-to o O m - "643,69,-: O O > > m m O_ O O O > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 L r 0 0 0 0 0 fU0 69 r c CI ° (U L 69 6► r r 0 O t0 U U L L 69 tD CO CO U U c') m N W W L Cff O N C4 U + ci O O L O O 0 0 0` N 69 to 69 to ' 69 + + + 69 69 M to r CD + + 6i CD CD (D CD + 69 O CD co 69 co to 00 00 CO 69 N co 69 V d9 C O c O C O f0 7 C O C 'o Cc 7 @ > l=0 (n c O Cp 7 0> O 7 Co :3 > O o OO o o W >> o O p 0 0 0 0 o °OOtn o C7 O o in to - 69 69 O z 0 O "vi 69 -4 o p 69 CV , r O O r J` EA r Cl 0 O O 619 y r 0 0 0 O O 5 0CDLd oo m c to N N to r to > J 69 69 69 69 6) 69 O F- E E wmmmmmmmm s c- E- s E- s E- w :2 2 m m m_ m m m o 7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 Zmmmmm0omm O z 0 0 0 0° 0 0 ° O o Co o 0 o O °tna0000a O N to 0 0 0 0 �tf9N 0000 69 > 69 to r to 0 O CD - L 69 09 r O O > > N N _O ° O O > > O O m O O O O O O L O O O O O tU0 r Ct CIO O L V> 69 r O U L L 69 M.- N N N U U N N m m O c N U ui o o m 69 °r° + CV CO O --t CA .2 CO N co r N Ch e} O 69 r CA t• to CD + 69 bi 69 69 ui M (O + + + + 69 O O to to to + O N CA "t st to N CD Cen O CD } 6i CMO O COO N Vi r r {n CT 69 6) 69 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (C. to O O O O O O °W:�N to OOOO 69 N to O O O > " 69 69 r In O O m 6960 > r O > > W d O O > > - O O O m O O O > L 0 0 0 0 O U r O O ° O 69 r O N L 69 69 r 0 �. U L L bi 69 r O CO U U L L 69 m m m U U N- m m W M co O O O O O + Co 00 N O CO O - cM cA ~ r (N 00 69 r 69 ^ CO t0 O + 69 + 0% b9 �t 69 V 6 +9 C) r CO (D zg O to rl- M M r N 00 M 69 V) 69 Cl) st cn 69 : r �t 69 69 : 69 C C .0 c O C O T+ ] C O M 7 (6 C f0 7 f6 > W f0 7 Z 7 W W W> O O°> > 0 0 0 0 0 0 U >> O o 0 00 0 0 z o °_0otn o OO to to r69toO ° O N 69 to Vr `6or Q o0069 y r o O 0 0 0 zoo °_td000W c to N N 1n r to > J_ 69 FA 69 69 to 69 O D U U U U U U U U m Q U U U U U U U U (O t0 N lC l0 l0 (6 W waaaCL 0- aaa O rnrnrnrno�C Wp_ammm'v'v_v rf 7 '7 > '7 7 7 7 7 Z m m m m m m m m O z m W J D ❑ W 2 U U) w J ❑ W U U) W U LU O a w LU LL W H W W Q 2 (1) U) W Jasa w0(D LL Z Z O p c)mm ❑ w U) W O W CL O U- a Z O! W a W D U w U_ W U m a) LL 0 a) )i lO )i o 0 m .. m 0 0 0 w� cc x ,. U T � d C 0 0 0 0 d t i 2 m Z 2 rn rn rn c c c O ovv () O O :3 E m m m - (1) a) a) (D E 5 000 rn a) D) 00 0'\0 0'\0 4) to y 0 a�a) E CL h m N a -O� aL 0 O m 0 0 0 m C c0 j 0 O «- G u U U- c V w I' U) E E m in m'E o m m co H y a CL a- ❑ uai a�i (j 0 (ai O cU �QCan- CO W y m m N y m c E 619 d �-' � m L O o O a) 4) 4) v a) O N N w j j y L >'D o O O 7 fA fA 09 >. T T T 7 7 7 7 U❑ O O O O O 2 2 = Z F- F- 2 O O m a) LL a) m T 7 O 2 m rn a) o! m O 0 N_ m 7 O a) E C N O 3 m m c y m D � m C � r a E 5 m L rn a) D) E > U 0 to c M E $ a�a) E h 0 0 �' N 0_ -O� aL O m U 0 vi v > 0 m C c0 j > O «- G u U U- c V w I' U) E E m in m'E o m m m H y a CL a- ❑ uai a�i (j 0 (ai O cU �QCan- D) U W y m m N y m c E d �-' � m L Q v v a o J '- - `y 'r v a) O N N w j j y L >'D n 7 ❑F -000W �wa:2 U❑ O U) U 2 a) m T 7 O 2 m rn a) o! m O 0 N_ m 7 O a) E C N O CITY OF EL SEGUNDO SCHEDULE B -2 BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES CURRENT PROPOSED ELECTRICAL PERMITS Permit Issuance $15.00 $28 Supplemental Permit Issuance $15.00 $21 Residential Appliances, up to 1 hp $4.00 $28 Non - Residential Appliances, up to 1 hp $8.00 $28 Electrical Sign $15.00 $133 Power Apparatus (Ratings in HP, KW, KVA, or KVAR) up to 5 $6.50 $114 5 -20 $10.00 $114 21 -50 $15.00 $114 51-100 $33.00 $114 100+ $50.00 $188 Temporary Power Pole $20.00 $37 Services, Switchboards, Control Centers, & Panels up to 600 volts up to 200 amps SFR $12.00 $56 Non -SFR $12.00 $133 201 -400 amps SFR $20.00 $56 Non -SFR $20.00 $133 401 -1,200 amps $36.00 $315 over 1,200 amps $45.00 $315 greater than 600 volts $60.00 $342 Switchboards First Section Standing Panel $35.00 N/A Additional Sections $30.00 N/A Over 600 Volt Section $60.00 N/A Additional Sections $55.00 NIA Receptacle, Switch, and Lighting Outlet, per fixture $0.50 $7 Lighting Fixture, per fixture $0.50 $7 Pole or Platform Mounted Fixtures, per fixture $3.00 $19 Swimming Pool $0.00 $111 Meter Reset $0.00 $37 Miscellaneous Conduits and Conductors (per 100 linear feet) $0.00 $28 Inspections not specified Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Reinspections Hourly Rate Hourly Rate After Hours Inspection (4 hour minimum) OT Hourly Rate OT Hourly Rate Overtime Hourly Rate is 120% of the Regular Hourly Rate CITY OF EL SEGUNDO SCHEDULE B -2 BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES CURRENT PROPOSED PLUMBING PERMITS Permit Issuance $15.00 $28 Supplemental Permit Issuance $15.00 $21 Plumbing Fixtures and Vents SFR $10.00 $11 Non -SFR $10.00 $27 Repair or Alteration of Drainage or Vent Piping $5.00 $28 Grease Interceptor $25.00 $237 Piping Single Family Residential (per dwelling unit) $8.00 $37 Multi Family Residential (per dwelling unit) $8.00 $114 Repipe Single Family Residential (per dwelling unit) $8.00 $56 Multi Family Residential (per dwelling unit) $8.00 $56 Lawn Sprinklers, Vacuum Breakers, and Backflow Protection Dev. Each Lawn Sprinkler System per Valve $5.00 $9 Each Vacuum Breaker or Backflow Protection Device $5.00 $9 Backflow Protection Device greater than 6" $25.00 $167 Gas System For Each System Less than 2" $15.00 $56 2" or more $50.00 $133 For Each Outlet $3.00 $11 Water Heater $8.00 $28 Solar Water Heating system $15.00 $56 Sewer 0 -25 linear feet $15.00 $28 each additional 100 linear feet $0.00 $28 Swimming Pool $75.00 $83 In- Ground Spa $30.00 $37 Pool /Spa Heater $0.00 $28 Miscellaneous $30.00 $56 Inspections not specified Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Reinspections Hourly Rate Hourly Rate After Hours Inspection (4 hour minimum) OT Hourly Rate OT Hourly Rate Overtime Hourly Rate is 120% of the Regular Hourly Rate CITY OF EL SEGUNDO SCHEDULE B -2 BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES CURRENT PROPOSED MECHANICAL PERMITS Permit Issuance $15.00 $28 Supplemental Permit Issuance $15.00 $21 Forced -Air or Gravity -Type Furnace or Burner $8.00 $47 Floor Furnace - Installation or Relocation $8.00 $37 Suspended /Recessed Wall /Floor Mounted Heater - Install /Reloc $8.00 $37 Fireplace $8.00 $76 Appliance Vents per each Inlet/Outlet $5.00 $13 Air Handling Units SFR $15.00 $56 Non -SFR $15.00 $133 Single Register Ventilation Fan $5.00 $9 Independent Venting System $14.00 $37 Hood served by Mechanical Exhaust $8.00 $133 Boilers, Compressors, and Absorption Systems 0 -3 HP or 0- 100,000 Btu /h $25.00 $114 3 -15 HP or 100,001- 500,000 Btu /h $25.00 $133 15 -30 HP or 500,001- 1,000,000 Btu /h $25.00 $237 30 -50 HP or 1,000,001 - 1,750,000 Btu /h $35.00 $342 50+ HP or 1,750,001+ Btu /h $75.00 $447 Incinerator /Kiln $0.00 $56 Alteration to Duct Work not otherwise noted $10.00 $4 Miscellaneous $30.00 $56 Inspections not specified Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Reinspections Hourly Rate Hourly Rate After Hours Inspection (4 hour minimum) OT Hourly Rate OT Hourly Rate Overtime Hourly Rate is 120% of the Regular Hourly Rate