CC RESOLUTION 4542RESOLUTION NO. 4542
A RESOLUTION OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE
AN ADDENDUM TO A PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SUBMITTED BY ROSECRANS-
SEPULVEDA PARTNERS 2, LLC, PES PARTNERS, LLC, AND THE
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO.
768 AND GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY TO DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT NO. 07 -03.
The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares that:
A. On March 1, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4415
approving Environmental Assessment No. 631 (certified EIR) with respect
to General Plan Amendment Nos. 03 -4 and 03 -5 for the
Sepulveda /Rosecrans Site Rezoning Reduced Traffic Generation
Alternative and the Plaza El Segundo Development Reduced Traffic
Generation Alternative Development; introduced Ordinance No. 1382 for
Zone Change Nos. 03 -2 and 03 -3, and ZTA 04 -1; and approved GPA Nos.
03 -4 and 03 -5 to re- designate and re -zone an approximately 54.9 -acre
property at the northeast corner of Sepulveda Boulevard and Rosecrans
Avenue to allow retail uses that includes the development of a 425,000
square -foot shopping center to be known as Plaza El Segundo;
B. On March 15, 2005, the City Council of the City of El Segundo ( "City
Council ") adopted Ordinance No. 1382 for Zone Change Nos. 03 -2 and
03 -3, Zone Text Amendment No. 04 -1, and Subdivision No. 03 -7 for the
Sepulveda /Rosecrans Site Rezoning Reduced Traffic Generation
Alternative and Plaza El Segundo Development Reduced Traffic
Generation Alternative, and Development Agreement No. 03 -1 for the
Plaza El Segundo Development Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative; .
C. On August 7, 2007, the City of El Segundo adopted Ordinance No. 1406,
which amended Development Agreement No. 03 -01;
D. On July 25, 2007, Rosecrans - Sepulveda Partners 2, LLC, and PES
Partners, LLC, filed an application for an Environmental Assessment (EA-
768) and Development Agreement No. 07 -03 (Second Amendment to
Development Agreement No. 03 -01) to develop an approximately 70,000
square -foot commercial retail project on an 8.133 -acre property at the
northeast corner of Sepulveda Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue that
includes 41,171 square feet of previously approved commercial retail
development on a 4.7 gross acre parcel. On January 10, 2008,
Rosecrans - Sepulveda Partners 2, LLC, and PES Partners, LLC, filed an
additional application requesting a Zone Text Amendment (ZTA No. 08-
01) relating to development standards in the Commercial Center (C-4)
Zone for permitted uses, setbacks, and signs. If these matters are
approved, the applicant proposes to add approximately 23,829 net square
feet to its previously approved shopping center development, which was
approved as reflected in Recitals 1 C and 1 D, above;
E. The applications from Rosecrans - Sepulveda Partners 2, LLC, and PES
Partners, LLC, were reviewed by the City's Planning and Building Safety
Department for, in part, consistency with the General Plan and conformity
with the El Segundo Municipal Code ( "ESMC ");
F. In addition, the City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under
the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§
21000, et seq., "CEQA "), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal.
Code of Regulations § §15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines "), and the
City's Environmental Guidelines (City Council Resolution No. 3805,
adopted March 16, 1993);
G. An Addendum to the certified Environmental Impact Report ( "EIR ") or
supplemental EIR was prepared since some changes and additions to the
previously certified EIR are necessary but none of the conditions require a
subsequent EIR;
H. The Planning and Building Safety Department completed its review and
scheduled a public hearing regarding the applications before the Planning
Commission for January 24, 2008;
On January 24, 2008, the Commission opened a public hearing to receive
public testimony and other evidence regarding the applications including,
without limitation, information provided to the Commission by City Staff,
public testimony, and representatives of Rosecrans - Sepulveda Partners 2,
LLC, and PES Partners, LLC;
J. On January 24, 2008, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
2630 recommending City Council approval of Environmental Assessment
No. 768, Development Agreement No. 07 -03 (Second Amendment to
Development Agreement No. 03 -01), and Zone Text Amendment No. 08-
01;
K. On February 19, 2008 the City Council held a public hearing and
considered the information provided by City staff, public testimony and
Rosecrans - Sepulveda Partners 2, LLC, and PES Partners, LLC;
-2-
L. On February 19, 2008 the City Council introduced Ordinance No.
approving Development Agreement No. 07 -03 and Zone Text Amendment
No. 08 -01;
M. This Ordinance and its findings are made based upon the testimony and
evidence presented to the City Council at its February 19 2008 public
hearing including, without limitation, the staff report submitted by the
Planning and Building Safety Department and upon all evidence in the
record of proceedings.
SECTION 2: Factual Findings. The City Council finds that the following facts exist:
A. The approximately 8.13 -acre, irregularly shaped, subject property is
located in the southern portion of the City of El Segundo. The site is
comprised of 2 separate parcels of 3.41 acres and 4.72 acres that would
be merged into one parcel. The entire subject property is roughly
bounded by the Union Pacific Railroad to the north, the General Chemical
and Air Products properties to the east, Rosecrans Avenue to the south,
and Sepulveda Boulevard to the west.
B. The majority of the site was historically devoted to industrial chemical
manufacturing facilities. Honeywell International, Inc. and General
Chemical had operational facilities on the site until 2003. At that time the
facilities were closed and demolished for resale and reuse. Remediation
activities for on -site soil contamination has also commenced on the
Honeywell International property.
C. The 8.13 -acre project site ( "Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 113") has
a Commercial Center land use designation and the zoning designation is
the Commercial Center (C -4) Zone. The FAR for the Commercial Center
land use designation is 0.275:1 and would permit up to 97,030 square feet
of commercial shopping center development. The proposed project
includes approximately 70,000 square feet of commercial shopping center
development.
D. Additional environmental evaluation has been conducted in an Addendum
to the certified Environmental Impact Report ( "FEIR ") for the proposed
approximately 70,000 square foot shopping center on the 8.13 acre
project site that includes the additional 3.4 acres from the
Rosecrans /Sepulveda Site Rezoning being added to the Plaza El
Segundo development project.
E. The proposed Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1B would be
constructed on approximately 8.13 gross acres within the
Sepulveda / Rosecrans Site Rezoning and would implement the new C -4
zoning on that portion of the site. The proposed Plaza El Segundo Project
-3-
Site Phase 1 B would be located south of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks
at the northeast corner of Sepulveda Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue.
F. The proposed Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1 B is a shopping
center of approximately 70,000 square feet. It would include the addition
of 23,829 square feet to the Plaza El Segundo project which is a 425,000
square -foot shopping center for a total of 448,829 square feet. The Plaza
El Segundo Project Site Phase 1 B shopping center would contain retail
and other commercial uses which could include specialty retail, home
furnishings, electronics, a spa, health and /or skin care services, apparel
and accessories, sales of automobiles, automobile accessories and parts,
and a variety of sit -down restaurants, and limited fast food restaurants
excluding drive through restaurants.
G. The proposed shopping center of Plaza El Segundo Phase 1B would
consist of several one- and two -story buildings with a maximum height of
65 feet. All development within the proposed Plaza El Segundo would
conform to the C -4 development standards, as amended by the proposed
Zone Text Amendment No. 08 -01 and the Development Agreement No.
07 -03 (Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. 03 -01).
H. The proposed FAR for this development would be 0.20:1 based on
approximately 70,000 gross square feet of development on 8.13 net acres.
Primary ingress and egress to the proposed addition to the Plaza El
Segundo development would be provided from Sepulveda Boulevard via a
driveway approximately 660 feet north of the intersection of Sepulveda
Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue and via a driveway approximately 370
feet east of the intersection of Sepulveda Boulevard and Rosecrans
Avenue. An approximately 150 to 200 -foot deceleration lane will be
provided for the Sepulveda Boulevard driveway. An approximately 94 -foot
deceleration lane will be provided for the Rosecrans Avenue driveway.
J. The addition to the Plaza El Segundo development is proposed to be
constructed as one phase. Construction is expected to commence in mid
2008 and to be completed in 2009.
K. An underground stormwater system would be constructed within the
proposed 8.13 -acre site to detain storm water runoff that would connect to
the on -site detention basin in the northeast corner of the site. The
proposed Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1 B would connect into the
existing water and sewer lines.
L. Parking for the proposed 8.13 acre portion of the Plaza El Segundo
development is proposed to be located in surface parking lots that will
surround the proposed shopping center buildings. Based on a total of
0
51,670 net square feet of commercial /retail space and 17,000 net square
feet of restaurant floor area, 388 parking spaces are required. The
developer proposes to provide 394 parking spaces, which exceeds the
City's parking requirements.
M. An amendment to the previously approved Development Agreement for
the Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1B includes modifications to the
project site boundary, an increase in the allowable building square footage
for the Plaza El Segundo Project by 23,829 square feet; subject to the
City' Council's approval of an amendment to ESMC 15 -5G -2, to allow
health and /or skin care services; an amendment to Section 4.1 of the
Development Agreement to permit the sale of automobiles, and as an
accessory use to the sale of automobiles the sale of automobile
accessories and automobile parts in Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase
1B, provided such use does not exceed 5,000 square feet of leaseable
floor area and provided that automobile repair and maintenance uses shall
not be permitted; subject to the City Council's approval of an amendment
to ESMC § 15 -5G -9, to allow light emitting diode ( "LED ") signs on -site
advertising and display signs; a fencing and landscaping screening
requirement along the eastern boundary of Phase 113; a $25,000
contribution to the Downtown Signage Program; an irrevocable offer to
dedicate land within the C -4 Zone for the extension of the Park Place
right -of -way; and conditional funding of up to $2,418,000 for the City's
acquisition of the Honeywell, Chevron and Union Pacific Railroad Park
Place roadway segments for the extension of Park Place in connection
with the development of Area B; conditions and requirements for the use
of Park Place Extension funds for the construction of Park Place; and an
amendment to Section 5.7 of the Development Agreement to provide that
the term of the Development Agreement is for a period of 11 years from
the date Ordinance No. 1382 became effective (April 16, 2005).
SECTION 3: Environmental Assessment. The City Council makes the following
environmental findings:
A. A Final Environmental Impact Report ( "FEIR ") for Environmental
Assessment No. 631, Development Agreement No. 03 -1, General Plan
Amendment No. 03 -4 & 03 -5, Zone Change No. 03 -2 & 03 -3, Zone Text
Amendment No. 04 -1, and Subdivision No. 03 -7 (Vesting Tentative Tract
No. 061630) was prepared and certified on March 1, 2005, pursuant to
City Council Resolution No. 4415.
B. The City Council reviewed and considered information contained in the
FEIR, and certified it on March 1, 2005 pursuant to Resolution No. 4415
and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to
Resolution No. 4415.
-5-
C. An Addendum to the previously certified FEIR was completed in
compliance with CEQA Guidelines § 15090. Some changes or additions
are necessary but none of the conditions in § 15162 calling for preparation
of a subsequent EIR have occurred. No new significant effects will result
from the revised project. No significant effects previously examined will be
substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR in accordance
with CEQA Guidelines § 15164(a) and § 15162.
D. The Addendum is attached to the Final EIR in accordance with CEQA
Guidelines § 15164 (c).
E. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines § 15164(e), the Addendum to the
Final EIR includes an explanation of the decision not to prepare a
subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to § 15162 and the explanation
is supported by substantial evidence, set forth in Exhibit A, hereto.
F. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines §§ 15090 and 15164(d) the
Addendum to the Final EIR reflects the City's independent judgment and
analysis and has been considered prior to the Planning Commission
making its recommendation on the project. The Addendum to the certified
FEIR is an accurate and complete statement of the environmental impacts
of the project. The Addendum to the FEIR was prepared under the
direction of the City of El Segundo Planning and Building Safety
Department and the City's environmental consultant and reflected the
independent judgment and analysis of the environmental impacts of the
project.
G. The Planning Commission reviewed and considered information contained
in the Addendum to the certified FEIR before recommending approval or
denial of the project in accordance with CEQA Guidelines § 15090.
Pursuant to City Environmental Guidelines, the Addendum to the FEIR
was prepared, distributed, and presented for City Council approval.
H. In accordance with § 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines, the record on which
the City Council's findings are based is located at the Planning and
Building Safety Department, City of El Segundo, 350 Main Street, El
Segundo, California 90245. The custodian of records is the Director of
Planning and Building Safety.
That when considering the whole record for the Addendum to the
previously certified FEIR, there is no evidence that the project will have
the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on
which the wildlife depends, because the project is in a built -out urban
environment.
in
J. These findings are based on the various mitigation measures to be
required in the implementation of the project as adopted in the FEIR as
already having been incorporated into the Project. The City Council finds
that all the mitigation measures now incorporated into the project are
desirable and feasible.
K. A re- adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations would be
required in order for the project to be approved.
SECTION 4: General Plan Consistency. The proposed project conforms with the City's
General Plan as follows:
A. The General Plan contains a number of relevant Goals, Objectives, and
Policies in the Economic Development Element. The goal of Objective
ED1 -1 is building "support and cooperation among the City of El Segundo
and its businesses and residential communities for the mutual benefits
derived from the maintenance and expansion of El Segundo's economic
base." The benefits of the development will be shared and supported by
all constituencies in the City. The development will provide significant
fiscal benefit to the City by generating additional business license and
sales tax revenue for the City's General Fund.
B. According to Policy ED1 -1.2, long -run efforts for economic development
should focus on "diversification of El Segundo's economic base in order to
meet quality of life goals." The project will add to the diversification of the
economic base in the City by providing for a greater variety of retail uses
in the City. Therefore, these uses will meet quality of life goals by
benefiting the residential and business communities with more diverse
retail uses not currently available in the City.
C. Objective ED1 -2 also directs diversification of the economic base "on
targeted industries that meet the City's criteria for job creation, growth
potential, fiscal impact and fit with local resources." The City's Economic
Development Advisory Council (EDAC) prepared a list of targeted
industries, which was approved by the City Council. These industries are
eligible for certain financial incentives because they meet the criteria
described in Objective ED1 -2. The retail and restaurant uses would be on
the list of targeted industries that the City is recruiting in order to meet its
diversification efforts. Therefore, the proposed project does meet the
diversification criteria established in the General Plan, by the EDAC, and
the City Council.
D. Due to the City's tax structure, a significant portion of the fiscal benefit
derived from most proposed development would be attributed to the
number of employees in a new development. Fifty -two additional jobs
would be generated by the development of the Plaza El Segundo Project
-7-
Site Phase 1B for a total of 1,004 jobs generated by Plaza El Segundo
Phase 1. Currently there is virtually no permanent employment on the
Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1 B. Therefore, the project meets the
job creation Objective (ED1 -2) in the General Plan.
E. Policies ED1 -2.1 and ED1 -2.2, both seek to promote land uses, which
improve the City's retail and commercial tax base. The stated purpose of
the Commercial Center Land Use Designation is to provide for retail and
other commercial services which provide a fiscal benefit to the City. The
remaining development would provide an estimated $383,837 annual
marginal fiscal benefit to the City.
F. The proposed project meets the City's policy of seeking balance between
enhanced economic development and available resources and
infrastructure capacity (Policies ED1 -2.3 and LU7 -1.2). As adequate
resources are currently available within the City to serve the proposed
project or will be developed as part of the project, a substantial new
commitment of resources or infrastructure is not required. The project
also proposes several roadway improvements to ensure that the project
would not overburden the existing roadway infrastructure. Based on this,
the proposed project is consistent with Policy ED1 -2.3.
G. Implementation of the proposed project will meet relevant goals and
policies with regard to the Land Use Element. The project will help the tax
base through the development of new commercial uses without adversely
affecting the viability of downtown (Goal LU4). The Plaza El Segundo
Project Site Phase 1 B is likely to include specialty retail, home furnishings
electronics, a spa, health and /or skin care services, apparel and
accessories, sales of automobiles and automobile accessories and parts,
and other merchandise in stores which will be able to provide a different
range of products than the smaller stores in downtown.
H. Objective LU4 -1 encourages high quality retail facilities in proximity to
major employment centers. The Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1B
is adjacent to the 2,000,000 square -foot Continental Park office
development, the 2,000,000 square -foot Raytheon campus and other
office buildings along the Rosecrans Avenue commercial corridor. The
proposed project will provide additional services to these employment
centers.
The project will be conditioned to require maintenance and permanent
upkeep on all the landscaping developed in conjunction with the project as
required by Policy LU4 -1.1.
J. Any development on the Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1 B would
be required to meet all health and safety and environmental regulations
-8-
and would be built to meet all current seismic safety standards, as
overseen by the City of El Segundo's Building Safety Division. The
appropriate regulatory agencies, including the Regional Water Quality
Control Board ( LARWQCB) would be required to approve remediation of
the existing soil and water contamination on the Plaza El Segundo Project
Site Phase 1 B. The LARWQCB determines what level of contaminants
are acceptable to allow construction at the subject site (Policy LU4 -1.2
and Policy LU4 -1.4).
K. Any proposed development would comply with all the zoning regulations
and development standards for the C -4 Zone (Policy LU4 -2.1).
L. Although the Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1 B is not located within
a quarter -mile of a Green Line Station, two are located within relatively
close proximity. The Doug las /Rosecrans Station is located approximately
0.4 miles east and El Segundo /Nash Station is located approximately 0.5
miles north (Policy LU4 -4.4) which will help encourage transit ridership to
the project.
M. The development of the Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1 B would
allow for the development for a blighted former industrial /chemical use
area into a new shopping /retail opportunity for the surrounding area. This
redevelopment would occur through the combined efforts of the City of El
Segundo and private applicants and would conform to the new C-4
development standards (Objective LU5 -3).
N. The Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1 B is only partially served by
water and sewer lines. Additional facilities will be installed as
development is approved on a project by project basis (Policy LU7 -1.2).
O. As development on the site is approved, stormwater detention basin(s)
would be required to contain the stormwater runoff. The size of these
basin(s) would depend on the size of the individual developments and
would be determined through completing a hydrology study (Policy LU7 -
1.4).
P. All new on -site utilities required for development(s) on the Plaza El
Segundo Project Site Phase 1B will be placed underground with the
construction of the individual project (Policy LU7 -2.3).
Q. Landscaping, in compliance with the development standards for the
Commercial Center (C-4) Zone, would be required for any development on
the Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1 B (Policy 7 -2.5).
R. The proposed project will be required to have strategic safety plans and a
fire life safety plan in place (Policy LU 7 -1.1 and Policy LU 7 -1.2).
ME
S. Access to development on the Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1B
would be provided from Sepulveda Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue.
This would allow emergency vehicle access to the site from two sides of
the subject property (Policy C1- 1.10).
T. The Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1B will include the widening of
Sepulveda Boulevard on the east side of the street to provide acceleration
and deceleration lanes to serve the project. The developer will dedicate
property or provide an easement for the lane widening (Policy C1- 1.14).
U. A trip generation study in compliance with the adopted mitigation
measures was prepared in December 2007 that analyzed the trip
generation of the Plaza El Segundo Development and the trip generation
for the additional proposed development of 23,829 square feet (Plaza El
Segundo Project Site Phase 1B). The trip generation study determined
that the number of vehicles trips for the Plaza El Segundo Development
and the additional 23,829 square feet of commercial retail development
would be less than the maximum number of trips allowed under the
adopted Plaza El Segundo Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative
Development project. The proposed Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase
1B combined with the Plaza El Segundo Development project would
generate 444 am peak period trips and 1454 pm peak period trips and
would remain below the maximum permitted number of 779 am peak
period trips and 1,477 pm peak period trips.
V. Development of the Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1B would
include landscaping, internal walkways and other amenities (e.g.,
pedestrian benches, gathering places, etc) which would facilitate
pedestrian movements and ensure that any future uses were accessible
and visitor friendly (Policy C2 -1.3).
W. Development on the Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1 B would
incorporate sidewalks along project boundaries and any new roadways
(Policy C2 -1.4).
X. The Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1B will have sidewalks around
the project boundaries and other internal pedestrian walkways with
linkages to surrounding properties and public transit stops (Policies C2-
1.3, C2 -1.6, and C2 -3.3).
Y. In addition to the Plaza El Segundo development, the Plaza El Segundo
Project Site Phase 1 B will be required to provide bicycle racks and lockers
that are distributed throughout the site. (Policy C2. -2.2)
-10-
Z. The proposed project will adhere to any applicable regulations regarding
preferential parking areas or promotion of ride share (Policy C2 -5.1). The
proposed project will provide sufficient on -site parking and loading (Policy
C3 -2.1 and C1 -3.2) as required by the El Segundo Municipal Code.
AA. Parking would be provided on the proposed Plaza El Segundo Project Site
Phase 1 B in accordance with the City of El Segundo's parking
requirements for the Commercial Center (C-4) Zone (Policy C3 -2.1).
BB. Policy C3 -1.1 requires all project - related transportation impacts to be
mitigated, where feasible, by the developer. The traffic impact study
identified a number of intersections in the City that would require
mitigation and identified mitigation measures to address the traffic
impacts. However, because two of the proposed mitigation measures are
infeasible due to right -of -way constraints, not all traffic impacts can be
mitigated to an insignificant level. In order for the City Council to approve
the project with significant impacts, the City Council must adopt a
Statement of Overriding Considerations finding that there are positive
aspects of the project, that when taken as a whole, outweigh the
unavoidable negative environmental impacts.
CC. The proposed project includes the development of an outdoor private
recreational facility, specifically a large landscaped plaza with outdoor play
equipment, a temporary stage, outdoor seating and a human chess set
area in conjunction with non - residential development consistent with
Policy OS1 -2.5. This would expand the recreational opportunities for
residents and employees in the City (Goal OS1 and Objective OS1 -2).
DD. The construction of plumbing to accommodate the use of reclaimed water
for irrigation systems, when available, and the application of the City's
Water Conservation in Landscape regulations (Title 10- Chapter 2 of the
ESMC), as required by mitigation measures M.24, M2.5, M2.6, M.2 -10,
M2 -13, and M2 -16 and Original Condition of Approval No. 8, would be
consistent with and further Policies CN2 -5, CN2 -7, CN2 -12.
EE. All development on the Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1 B would be
required to include a comprehensive and coherent design for the
development, including landscaping and amenities, in order to improve the
existing aesthetic appearance of the site (Policy CN2 -7).
FF. All development on the Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1 B would be
required to include facilities capable of holding stormwater runoff resulting
from the development. Additionally, reclaimed water would be used to the
extent possible in the irrigation of the landscaping (Policy CN2 -11).
GG. All development on the Plaza El Segundo Project Site Phase 1B would be
required to utilize reclaimed water for landscaping to the extent feasible
(Policy CN2 -12).
HH. The project would provide a comprehensive and coordinated design of the
entire project site, including landscape amenities to substantially improve
the aesthetic appearance of the site and the surrounding area as
encouraged by Policy CN5 -6.
II. The project has been identified and is currently under Los Angeles
Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) orders to remediate
soil and ground water contamination as contemplated by Goal CN3 and
Policy CN3 -2 to protect groundwater from contamination.
JJ. The implementation of transportation demand management programs, as
required by Mitigation Measure L -8 (bike, rideshare matching, and transit
options), and as required by Chapters 15 -16 and 15 -17 of the El Segundo
Municipal Code will demonstrate compliance with air quality objectives to
encourage alternative commuting strategies (AQ1 -1), reduce vehicle trips
(AQ3 -1.1, AQ3 -1.2), and promote non - motorized transportation (AQ4 -1.1).
KK. Approximately $407,675 in Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees must be paid to
the City to offset development impacts (AQ5 -1.2) related to the project.
Approximately $500,000 in costs for on -site and off -site traffic mitigation
will also be incurred by the developer for the Plaza El Segundo
development Phase 1 B project.
LL. The project will implement a number of traffic improvements, as required
by mitigation measures L -13, L -14, L -15, L -16, L -17, L -18 and L -19 which
will improve traffic flow (Policy AQ 7 -1.1, AQ 7 -2.1).
MM. Mitigation measure M.5 -1 provides that the proposed project will
incorporate energy conservation devices (i.e., motion - sensitive light
activation switches, etc.) consistent with City (Policy AQ 12 -1.2).
NN. Implementation of the proposed project, subject to mitigation measures I-
1, 1 -2, 1 -3, 1-4, and 1 -5 which address construction hours, equipment
mufflers, construction equipment staging, and noise barriers, will be
consistent with relevant policies of the City's Noise Element (Policies N1-
2.1, N1 -2.16, N1 -2.1C, W -3.1, N1 -3.5, and Program N1- 2.1A).
00. The development on the proposed Project Site Phase 1B will end eighty
years of industrial use on the property which will significantly reduce the
quantity of many hazardous materials that have been handled on the site
(Objective PS3 -1).
-12-
PP. The developer will remediate soil and groundwater contamination under
the authority of the LARWQCB (Policy PS4 -1.1).
QQ. Public Safety Element Policy PS6 -1.2 to continue efforts to reduce fire
hazards would be furthered by preparation of fire life safety plans
(mitigation measures K1 -2, K1 -5, K.1 -7, and K -1.10) and the reduction of
fire prone industrial facilities.
RR. As required by mitigation measures K1 -3 and K.1 -8, fire access roads will
be provided throughout the proposed 8.131 -acre project site (Policy PS6-
1.2E).
SS. As a re -use of a previously developed industrial site, that will be
remediated to the satisfaction of the appropriate regulatory agencies and
will not pose any health hazard to employees, patrons or visitors to the
site, the project is consistent with Policy HM3 -1.1 requiring compliance
with hazardous materials handling laws. Mitigation measures G -5 and G -6
will ensure that site contamination is remediated.
SECTION 5: Approvals.
A. The City Council adopts Findings of Facts and readopts a Statement of
Overriding Considerations adopted by the City Council on March 1, 2005,
pursuant to Resolution No. 4415, as set forth in Exhibit "A ", which are
incorporated into this Resolution by reference.
B. In accordance with the requirements of Public Resources Code Section
21081(a) and 21081.6, the City Council adopts a Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program (MMRP) as set forth in attached Exhibit "B," which is
incorporated into this Resolution by reference. The City Council hereby
adopts each of the mitigation measures expressly set forth herein as
conditions of approval of the project. The other project conditions of approval
and compliance with applicable codes, policies, and regulations will further
assure that the environmental impacts of the proposed project will not be
greater than set forth in the Addendum to the previously certified FEIR and
these findings.
C. Subject to the conditions listed on the attached Exhibit "C," which are
incorporated into this Resolution by reference, the City Council approves an
Addendum to a previously certified Final Environmental Impact Report, and
approves Zone Text Amendment No. 08 -01 and Development Agreement No.
07 -03 (Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. 03 -01).
SECTION 6: Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and
determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence,
both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings
-13-
and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City
Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in
the record as a whole.
SECTION 7: Limitations. The City Council's analysis and evaluation of the project is
based on the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a
project that absolute and perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the project will not
exist. One of the major limitations on analysis of the project is the City Council's lack of
knowledge of future events. In all instances, best efforts have been made to form
accurate assumptions. Somewhat related to this are the limitations on the City's ability
to solve what are in effect regional, state, and national problems and issues. The City
must work within the political framework within which it exists and with the limitations
inherent in that framework.
SECTION 8: Summaries of Information. All summaries of information in the findings,
which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The
absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a
particular finding is not based in part on that fact.
SECTION 9: This Resolution will remain effective until superseded by a subsequent
resolution.
SECTION 10: According to the El Segundo Municipal Code, a copy of this Resolution
shall be mailed to Rosecrans - Sepulveda Partners 2, LLC, and PES Partners, LLC; and
to any other person requesting a copy.
SECTION 11: This Resolution is the City Council's final decision and will become
effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND AQ(;PTED thil',f9`" day,6f F%pbruary 2008.
Kelly McDowell, Mayor
-14-
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
SS
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Resolution No. 4542 was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and
signed by the Mayor, and attested to by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 19th day of February, 2008, and the same was so passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES: McDowell, Busch, Boulgarides, Fisher, Jacobson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
_LW U&
W 15A
Cindy Mcytesen, City Clerk
APPROVED A iOFWC M
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
R \PlanningBBuilding Safety\PROJECTS \751 - 775 \EA - 768 \Council Agenda Packet\CC.02.19.2008\2008.02.19.EA-
768.CC.reso.4542.doc
-15-
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542
Exhibit A
On March 1, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4415 approving Environmental
Assessment No. 631 (certified EIR), and General Plan Amendment Nos. 03 -4 and 03 -5 for the
Sepulveda /Rosecrans Site Rezoning Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative and the Plaza El
Segundo Development Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative;
On March 15, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1382 approving Zone Change
Nos. 03 -2 and 03 -3, Zone Text Amendment No. 04 -1, and Subdivision No. 03 -7 for the
Sepulveda /Rosecrans Site Rezoning Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative and Plaza El
Segundo Development Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative, and Development Agreement
No. 03 -1 for the Plaza El Segundo Development Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative;
The Certified EIR analyzed an assumed 850,000 square feet of retail uses on the approximately
110 -acre Sepulveda - Rosecrans Rezoning Site ( "S /R Project') and at a program level. It
analyzed the impacts of a 425,000 square -foot shopping center on a 38.1 net acre portion of the
110 -acre site at a project level ( "Plaza El Segundo Development" or "Original Project ").
On July 25, 2007, Rosecrans - Sepulveda Partners 2, LLC, and PES Partners, LLC, filed an
application for an Environmental Assessment (EA -768) and Development Agreement (DA No.
07 -03) to develop an approximately 70,000 square -foot commercial retail project on an 8.13 -
acre property at the northeast corner of Sepulveda Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue that
includes 41,171 square feet of previously approved commercial retail development on a 4.7
gross acre parcel. On January 10, 2008, Rosecrans - Sepulveda Partners 2, LLC, and PES
Parnters, LLC, filed an additional application requesting a Zone Text Amendment (ZTA No. 08-
01) relating to development standards in the Commercial Center (C -4) Zone for permitted uses,
setbacks, and signs. If these matters are approved, the applicant proposes to add
approximately 23,829 net square feet to the previously approved 425,000 square foot shopping
center, known as Plaza El Segundo. The proposed project approvals are a "project' pursuant to
California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000 et seq (CEQA). Therefore,
an Addendum to the certified EIR has been prepared in accordance with CEQA.
The City Council has carefully and independently reviewed and considered all of the evidence in
the record presented in connection with the hearing on the Addendum and proposed approvals,
including, but not limited to, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and all written
and oral testimony presented. Based thereon, the City Council finds as follows:
I. FINDINGS REQUIRED BY CEQA.
An Addendum has been prepared under the authority of Public Resources Code §
21166 and of 14 Ca. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq. (the State CEQA Guidelines) at Section
15164(a) which allows a lead agency to prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if
some changes or additions to the previously certified EIR are necessary but none of the
conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for preparation of a
subsequent EIR have occurred. Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines states that no
subsequent EIR shall be prepared unless the lead agency determines on the basis of
substantial evidence in light of the whole record one or more of the following:
"(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of
the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase n the severity of previously identified significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project
is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of
new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified significant effects;
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have
been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified
as complete, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous
EIR;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown
in the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact
be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the
project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those
analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative."
II. FINDINGS REGARDING THE POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE
PROJECT MODIFICATIONS WHEN COMPARED TO EFFECTS ANALYZED IN THE
CERTIFIED EIR.
A. Aesthetics
The Revised Project would add additional development to an already developed
urban area. The height and massing of the Revised Project would be similar to
that of the Original Project, as well as the surrounding commercial, industrial, and
office uses and would have the same aesthetic impacts as the Original Project.
The Revised Project would include the same sources and levels of new lighting
as would occur under the Original Project, as the uses and site configuration
would be similar to the Original Project. The Revised Project would add light
sources and lighted signage within an area characterized by existing high levels
of nighttime lighting in the area, same as the Original Project. New signs that
would be permitted under the proposed Zone Text Amendment may be visible
from Rosecrans Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard, but would not be prominent
because they would be required to be oriented primarily to face within the
shopping center area and would be limited in size to 30 feet by 60 feet. The
distance of sensitive receptors from the site would be the same as under the
Original Project. The new signs would not likely be visible from the residential
areas located southwest of the project site because of the orientation and size of
the permitted displays, along with intervening development and grade changes
between the project site and the nearby residential area. The mitigation
measures identified in the Certified EIR would continue to be applicable to the
Revised Project. (Addendum page 8) The certified EIR found Aesthetic Impacts
of the Sepulveda - Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Original Projects to be less than
significant. The Revised Project would cause no new significant impacts.
2
B. Air Quality
Construction of new development associated with the Revised Project would
exceed the SCAQMD significance threshold for NO,, (see Table 2 on Page 10 of
the Addendum). However, the Certified EIR identified that construction activities
associated with the Plaza El Segundo Development and the S/R Project would
exceed the SCAQMD threshold for NO, emissions and maximum NO, emissions
under the Revised Project (111.0 pounds per day) would be lower than projected
for the Original Project (456.61 pounds per day) and within the range of
emissions projected and analyzed for the S/R Project. As such, NOX emissions
associated with the Revised Project would not represent a new significant impact
or substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. The same
mitigation measures that were identified for the Original Project with respect to
construction emissions would be applicable to the Revised Project. Construction
emissions associated with the Revised Project would be below the SCAQMD
threshold for the remaining criteria pollutants (CO, PM,o, PM25, SO),, and ROG)
and would be less than significant. For the Original Project, the certified EIR
found construction emissions for ROG be significant; for the S/R Project
construction emissions of CO, PM 10 and ROG exceeded SCAQMD thresholds of
significance. Construction emissions of the Revised Project would also be below
the Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) established by the SCAQMD. The
SCAQMD's LST methodology, which had not been established when the
previous EIR was certified in February, 2005, is used to determine whether the
construction emissions of a project would cause or contribute to adverse
localized air quality impacts on the surrounding land uses. The thresholds shown
in Table 2 on Page 10 of the Addendum under the row titled "SCAQMD Localized
Significance Thresholds" represent the maximum emissions levels that can occur
for each criteria pollutant without causing an exceedance of the applicable air
quality standard and therefore adversely affecting adjacent sensitive uses.
Additionally, the projected emissions of the Revised Project would not exceed
any of the SCAQMD LSTs (Table 2 on Addendum Page 10). Thus impacts of
the Revised Project related to local air quality during construction would be less
than significant. (Addendum Pages 8 -10)
Operational air quality impacts of the Revised Project would be similar to or less
than the impacts of the Original Project due to the fact that the Revised Project
would not exceed the number of daily car trips used in the air quality analysis for
the Original Project. Thus, even though daily regional emissions of CO, ROG,
NOX, and PM,o could exceed the SCAQMD significance threshold under the
Revised Project, this impact would not represent a new significant impact or
substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. Since the
peak hour trip generation under the Revised Project would not exceed the peak
hour trip generation limits of the Original Project, local concentrations of CO
would not exceed the maximum allowable concentrations under the Revised
Project, same as the Original Project. (Addendum page 10)
C. Biological Resources
The Certified EIR determined that the S/R Project would have less than
significant impacts but that the Original Project potentially impacted 0.30 acres of
wetlands. The Revised Project proposes to add approximately 3.4 acres to the
Original Project site. These 3.4 acres are presently part of the
Sepulveda /Rosecrans Rezoning Site. The 0.30 acres of potential wetland habitat
3
are not located within this 3.4 acre area; rather the potential wetland habitat area
was within the portion of the Plaza El Segundo Development that has been
constructed or is under construction. Therefore, the mitigation measure related
to wetlands would not be applicable to the Revised Project. With respect to the
bird species identified as being potentially present within the
Sepulveda /Rosecrans Rezoning Site, site - specific focused surveys were
performed by Dudek & Associates for the remainder of the Sepulveda /Rosecrans
Rezoning Site in June, 2006 (see Appendix B of the Addendum). During this
survey, the proposed 3.4 acre area that would be added to the Plaza El Segundo
Development under the Revised Project was fenced off and not accessible for
survey, however; the area was completely paved and void of any vegetation or
biological resources. Therefore, the Revised Project would cause no new or
substantially more severe significant impacts.
D. Geology and Soils
The Revised Project would add approximately 3.4 acres to the Plaza El Segundo
Development. These 3.4 acres are located within the Sepulveda /Rosecrans
Rezoning Site addressed in the Certified EIR. As such, the Revised Project
would be subject to the same conditions related to soil conditions and potential
seismic activity analyzed, in the certified EIR. Consequently, impacts of the
Revised Project with respect to surface fault rupture; seismicity and ground
shaking; liquefaction and seismic settlement; slope stability; subsidence;
expansive soils; landform alteration; building foundations; or grading would be
less than significant, as determined in the certified EIR with respect to both the
Original and S/R Projects. The additional 3.4 acres do not include any unlined
natural depressions. However, grading activity associated with the Revised
Project could result in wind -borne erosion, identified in the certified EIR as
potentially significant before mitigation. The same mitigation measure that was
applicable to the Original Project would be applicable to the Revised Project and
would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Thus, the Revised Project
would not result in a new significant impact or substantial increase in the severity
of a previously identified impact with respect to wind -borne erosion.
The Revised Project would add 3.4 acres to the Plaza El Segundo Development
which could experience conditions related to methane gas, identified in the
certified EIR as potentially significant with respect to the S/R Project and less
than significant as to the Original Project. Methane gas soil sampling was
undertaken on the 3.4 acre area (see Appendix C of the Addendum). Twelve soil
gas samples were collected from six locations within the 3.4 acre area and
analyzed for methane per United States Environmental Protection Agency
Method 8015M. Methane was not detected at or above the reporting limit of 10
parts per million by volume (ppmv) in any of the samples analyzed. The samples
were also below the 1,000 ppmv threshold for additional sampling and further
investigation'. Therefore, no additional sampling of soil gas for methane was
warranted and impacts of the Revised Project with respect to methane would be
less than significant.
4
E. Hydrology and Water Quality
The certified EIR determined that, with mitigation, both the S/R and Original
Projects would have a less than significant impact on Hydrology and Water
Quality. The Revised Project would have similar storm water runoff quality
during construction as the Original Project. Similar types of construction
activities would be involved in the construction of the Revised Project.
Additionally, the Revised Project would be required to comply with the
requirements set forth in the County -wide General Construction Activity Storm
Water Permit. The Hydrology Study in Appendix D of the Addendum documents
demonstrates that, under the Revised Project, the site would be designed to
drain through a proposed storm drain system into an on -site detention basin in
the northeast corner of the site. Storm runoff discharging from the detention
basin would be restricted to a discharge rate equal to or less than the discharge
from the existing site. This would ensure that there is no net increase in the
runoff rate of flows to the adjacent General Chemical property to the east. Based
upon the hydrology calculations in the Hydrology Report, it was determined that
the Revised Project site can be protected from flooding through the use of on -site
storm drains in conjunction with an on -site detention basin. Furthermore, similar
to the Original Project, the Revised Project would be subject to the same
requirements set forth in the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan for Los
Angeles County and Cities in Los Angeles County. The mitigation measures
identified in the Certified EIR would be applicable to the Revised Project. Thus,
the Revised Project would not result in a new significant impact or a substantial
increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact.
F. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The certified EIR concluded that, with mitigation, the impacts of both the S/R and
Original Projects would be less than significant. The Revised Project would add
approximately 3.4 acres to the Plaza El Segundo Development. This 3.4 acre
addition is part of a 7.6 acre property previously owned by General Chemical
Corporation (GCC) that was utilized for various industrial operations including
pesticides grinding and packaging, sulfuric acid production and production of
liquid aluminum chloride and aluminum sulfate. Specifically, previous facilities
located on or adjacent to the 3.4 acre addition included: Nitric Warehouse;
Photochemical and Hypo Plant; Cooling Tower and Substation; Calcium and
Ammonium Polysulfide Manufacturing; and Aluminum Chloride Production.
Operations on the 3.4 acre site had ceased by 1989 and the buildings were
removed in 2002 -2003.
Based on the previous use of the site, several site investigations have been
conducted on the 7.6 acre GCC property, including the 3.4 acre site proposed to
be added to the Plaza El Segundo Development.
A Site Characterization Work Plan was submitted to the Regional Water Quality
Control Board — Los Angeles Region (LARWQCB) in 2004. The work plan was
modified as described in the Site Characterization Work Plan Addendum
submitted in May 2005. Site characterization work was initiated in August 2005
by Meredith & Associates (MAI). MAI installed 81 soil borings and collected
analyzed 195 soil samples over the entire 7.6 acre GCC site. Results were
5
submitted to LARWQCB in October 2005. Based on this investigation, the
primary chemicals in soil at concentrations exceeding regulatory screening
criteria were organochlorine pesticides. Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH),
polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metals were also observed at
concentrations in excess of conservative screening criteria.
A Soil Vapor Survey Work Plan was submitted by Jacobson Engineering to
LARWQCB on behalf of GCC in November, 2005. GCC retained Hydro -Geo
Spectrum to conduct the shallow soil gas survey in December, 2005. A total of
74 soil gas samples were collected at 38 separate locations on the 7.6 acre GCC
site. The most widely detected chemicals were: trichloroethene (TCE); Freon -
113, 1,2 dichloroethene (1,2 -DCE), Freon -11, chloroform, tetrachloroethene
(PCE). Additional volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected but not as
widely as those listed above. The results of this survey were reported to
LARWQCB in January, 2006.
GCC retained MAI to obtain samples from selected wells during two of the
routine quarterly groundwater sampling rounds performed by CH2MHil1 on the
GCC site and the adjacent Honeywell property. MAI obtained samples from
CH2MHill field staff in November 2005 and May 2006 for analysis of chemicals of
concern relevant to the GCC site. Gamma hexachlorine (BHC), also known as
Lindane, was reported to be the only chemical detected in groundwater
exceeding maximum contaminant levels (MCLs). These results were reported to
LARWQCB in August, 2006.
A comprehensive analysis addressing previous work performed on the GCC site,
along with additional testing across the 7.6 acre GCC site, was prepared by
Environmental Resources Management (ERM) in December, 2006 (see
Addendum E of the Addendum). Based on physical characteristics of the site
related to surface cover and reported fill thickness, ERM divided the GCC site
into three zones:
• Zone Alpha — covered with asphalt and /or concrete and having a
relatively thin (2 to 10 feet) layer of fill material.
Zone Beta — partially covered with variable fill thickness (5 to 16 feet); and
• Zone Gamma — mostly uncovered with a relatively thick (10 to 19 feet)
layer of fill.
The approximately 3.4 acre area proposed to be included in the Plaza El
Segundo Development under the Revised Project primarily includes Zone Alpha,
a with small area of Zone Beta (see Figure 3, page 16 of the Addendum). ERM's
scope included:
Installation of three multi -depth soil vapor probes to depths of 40, 60 and 70
feet below ground surface (bgs) within the western area of the GCC site;
• Driving of 19 cone penetrometer test points across the GCC site;
0
• Drilling and soil sampling at 132 locations using a combination of direct -push
and hollow -stem auger rigs;
• Collection of grab soil samples at 12 locations (11 surface and one stockpile);
• Collection of concrete samples at 3 locations.
In total, ERM analyzed 465 soil samples, 15 soil vapor samples and three
concrete samples. This analysis yielded the following results:
• Volatile organic compounds (primarily trichloroethene and 1,2 dichloroethene)
are present in subsurface vapors at concentrations that exceed conservative
screening criteria for indoor air. Based on the lateral and vertical distribution
of these compounds in soil gas (on and off site), and the lack of on -site soil
sources based on available data, it appears that the source of these
compounds is associated with nearby, documented off -site sources
associated with the former Honeywell Southwest Corner Lot Parcel and
Unlined Natural Depression (UND) 4.
• Based on a comparison of soil data to conservative screening criteria and an
evaluation of the prevalence and magnitude of detected compounds, the
following chemicals of potential concern (COPCs) have been identified within
the 3.4 acre area proposed to be added to the Plaza El Segundo
Development:
➢ Organochlorine Pesticides — 4,4 dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (DDD);
4,4 dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE); 4,4 dichlorodiphenyl -
trichloroethane (DDT); Alpha- hexachlorocyclohexane(BHC), Beta -BHC
and Gamma -BHC (Lindane). Concentrations above screening criteria
were detected at the indicated number of locations within the proposed
3.4 acre addition area: DDD (1 location); DDE (3); DDT (14); Alpha -BHC
(8); Beta -BHC (2) (see Figures 13 through 16 in Appendix E to this
Addendum).
➢ Total petroleum hydrocarbons — Diesel range;
➢ Polyaromatic hydrocarbons — Benzo(a)a nth race ne; benzo(a)pyrene;
benzo(b)fluoranthene; benzo(k)fluoranthene and dibenz(a)anthracene.
Metals — arsenic, lead and chromium. Concentrations above screening
criteria were detected at the indicated number of locations within the
proposed 3.4 acre addition area: arsenic (1); lead (2); chromium (8) (see
Figures 17 and 18 in Appendix E of the Addendum).
Fi
The chemicals detected within the proposed 3.4 acre addition area are the same
as those detected and remediated on the remainder of the Original Project site.
The findings of the site characterizations for the 3.4 acre proposed addition to the
Plaza El Segundo Development would not represent a new significant impact or
substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. Additional
studies are planned for the proposed 3.4 acre addition to evaluate the site -
specific risks associated with the observed chemical presence based on future
property use and potential impacts of soil conditions on groundwater. These
studies include the development of an infiltration model based on site - specific
physical soil data and development of a site - specific human health risk
assessment. In addition, new groundwater data collected during future
monitoring events both up- and down - gradient of the site will be incorporated into
the analysis.
The mitigation measures identified in the Certified EIR would be applicable to the
Revised Project. These measures would require the completion of the studies
identified above, along with any other required remediation activities, and
approval by LARWQCB or other cognizant regulatory agency, prior to issuance
of grading permits for the Revised Project. As such, impacts of the Revised
Project would be the same as the Original and S/R Projects with respect to site
contamination.
The proposed Zone Text Amendment that is included in the Revised Project and
that would exclude environmental mitigation structures required by regulatory
agencies from setback requirements would facilitate the installation of required
groundwater remediation facilities within the project site. Therefore, impacts of
the Revised Project with respect to long term groundwater remediation activities
would be the same as analyzed for the Original and S/R Projects.
G. Land Use
The Revised Project includes the same land uses analyzed in the Certified EIR
and would be consistent with the requirements of the C -4 zoning designation,
with the approval of the proposed Zone Text Amendments. With respect to land
use, the proposed Zone Text Amendments would permit an additional land use
(health and /or skin care services) and additional signage (two LED signs). The
additional permitted land use would be consistent with and complementary to the
other retail and commercial land uses allowed within the C-4 zone and would be
compatible with the other shopping center and retail and restaurant uses already
constructed within the project site. The proposed signage would be oriented
primarily within the already constructed uses and would be designed to serve
shopping center patrons. Thus the proposed changes to permitted signage
would be compatible with existing land uses. Additionally, the proposed Zone
Text Amendment addresses the location of environmental mitigation structures
which would have a beneficial effect on long term groundwater remediation
activities on the project site. Thus, the Revised Project would have impacts
similar to the Original Project, and not greater than those analyzed for the S/R
Project, with respect to land use compatibility, zoning, and land use policies and
regulations. The Revised Project would be consistent with the applicable land
use policies and regulations set forth in the Regional Comprehensive Plan and
Guide as well as the City of El Segundo General Plan.
�-i
H. Noise
The Revised Project would involve similar construction activities as would occur
under the Original Project. Construction noise impacts of the Original Project
were found to be significant and unavoidable at one location (FedEx facility), and
at the FedEx and Pacific Theater facilities for the S/R Project. Because
construction activity associated with the Revised Project would take place at a
greater distance from the FedEx and Pacific Theater facilities than the
construction activities associated with the Original Project, and as analyzed for
the S/R Project, construction noise impacts associated with the Revised Project
would be lower than construction noise impacts of the Original and S/R Projects
with respect to those locations. The construction noise analysis in the Certified
EIR took construction activity on the portion of the Plaza El Segundo
Development located south of the UPRR tracks into account and concluded that
impacts on the nearest sensitive receptor (Oak Avenue residential) would be less
than significant after mitigation. The same mitigation measures identified for the
Original Project would be applicable to the Revised Project. Therefore,
construction noise impacts of the Revised Project would be the same as the
Original Project and not greater than the impacts of the S/R Project.
The certified EIR found that impacts caused by parking lots and loading docks
were less than significant for both the Original and S/R Projects. Noise
associated with parking lot and loading activities under the Revised Project would
be the same as the Original Project. Traffic noise impacts of the Revised Project
would be similar to or less than the Original Project since peak hour trip
generation under the Revised Project would not exceed the peak hour trip
generation of the Original Project and would therefore fall in the projections
analyzed in the certified EIR for both projects.
I. Population, Housing and Employment
The Revised Project would result in additional commercial square footage within
the Plaza El Segundo Development but not in the S/R Project. The uses with the
proposed Revised Project are similar to that of the Original and S/R Projects;
however, total square footage under the Revised Project would increase by
23,829 square feet compared to the Original Project, but within the 1,904
employees projected to the S/R Project. As the Revised Project does not include
a residential component, no project - related impacts to population and housing
would occur. The additional square footage under the Revised Project would
generate approximately 53 additional employees (23,829 square feet x 2.24
employees /1,000 square feet) compared to the Original Project, but within the
1.904 employees project for the S/R Project. The Certified EIR concluded that
the Original Project would generate approximately 952 jobs, which would be
within the SCAG employment growth forecast for the City of El Segundo of
13,915 jobs between 2000 and 2010. The additional 53 jobs under the Revised
Project would remain within this forecast. Therefore, impacts of the Revised
Project with respect to population, housing, and employment would be similar to
the Original Project and within the range analyzed in the certified EIR for the S/R
Project.
The Certified EIR identified a significant cumulative impact on population growth
and housing demand, based on the disparity between the number of projected
p
housing units and estimated job growth in the South Bay Cities Subregion. The
Certified EIR concluded that the Original Project and S/R Project would not
contribute substantially to this impact because potential job growth associated
with the Original Project would not result in substantial relocation and addition of
permanent residents. The additional 53 jobs that would be associated with the
Revised Project would be of the same nature as the jobs generated by the
Original Project and S/R Project and would similarly not be expected to result in
relocation and population growth in the South Bay Cities Subregion. Therefore
the impact of the Revised Project with respect to cumulative subregional
population growth and housing demand would be the same as the Original
Project and S/R Project.
J. Public Services
The Revised Project would add approximately 3.4 acres to the Plaza El Segundo
Development and would increase square footage of development. As such, the
Revised Project would generate increased demand for fire protection services
compared to the Original Project. However, the increased demand associated
with the Revised Project would not exceed the level of demand for the
Sepulveda /Rosecrans Site Rezoning, for which the Certified EIR concluded that
impacts on fire protection services would be less than significant. Moreover, the
additional land use that would be permitted under the proposed Zone Text
Amendment (health and /or skin care services) would be similar to the
commercial, retail and restaurant uses presently permitted under the C-4 zone.
The additional use permitted under the Zone Text Amendment would not
represent a use that would require fire protection services beyond those already
contemplated to serve the uses that are currently allowed. A Water Line /Fire
Flow Report was prepared by Development Resource Consultants and can be
found in Appendix F of this Addendum. The report found that the project site has
adequate fire flow for the development that would occur under the Revised
Project. Furthermore, the project site is less than one mile from Fire Station #2
and all buildings will have automatic fire sprinklers installed for additional fire
safety. The same conditions imposed on the Original Project by the City would
apply to the Revised Project. Therefore, the Revised Project would not represent
a new significant impact or increase in severity of a previously identified impact
with respect to fire protection services.
The Revised Project would add approximately 3.4 acres to the Plaza El Segundo
Development and would increase square footage of development. As such, the
Revised Project would generate increased demand for police protection services
compared to the Original Project. However, the increased demand associated
with the Revised Project would not exceed the level of demand for the
Sepulveda /Rosecrans Site Rezoning, for which the Certified EIR concluded that
impacts on police protection services would be less than significant. Moreover,
the additional land use that would be permitted under the proposed Zone Text
Amendment (health and /or skin care services) would be similar to the
commercial, retail and restaurant uses presently permitted under the C-4 zone.
The additional use permitted under the Zone Text Amendment would not
represent a use that would require police protection services beyond those
already contemplated to serve the uses that are currently allowed. The same
conditions imposed on the Original Project by the City would apply to the Revised
Project. Therefore, the Revised Project would not represent a new significant
10
impact or increase in severity of a previously identified impact with respect to
police protection services.
K. Transportation and Traffic
The Revised Project would add approximately 3.4 acres to the Plaza El Segundo
Development and would increase total square footage of development by 23, 829
square feet compared to the Original Project. An analysis of the total traffic
generation associated with the Revised Project was undertaken (see Appendix G
of the Addendum). The Trip Generation Comparison in Table 3 on Page 22 of
the Addendum shows that the development of the Revised Project would not
exceed the maximum allowable traffic trip counts analyzed in the Certified EIR
and contained in the approved Development Agreement and conditions of
approval for the Original Project. Since the trip counts would not be exceeded,
impacts related to traffic and transportation under the Revised Project would be
the same as or less than impacts from the Original Project. Impacts of the
Revised Project with respect to traffic would not represent a new significant or
substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact.
The Revised Project proposes to provide access to the southern 8.1 acres of the
Plaza El Segundo Development, including the 3.4 acre addition, via driveways
located on northbound Sepulveda Boulevard and westbound Rosecrans Avenue.
The Sepulveda Boulevard driveway would allow right turns in and out only. The
Rosecrans Avenue driveway would allow westbound right turns and eastbound
left turns into the site and right turns only out of the site. To ensure that the
modified access pattern would not affect adjacent intersections, a level of service
analysis was conducted at three intersections to evaluate shifts in traffic that
would vary from those evaluated in the Certified EIR. Table 4 on Page 22 of the
Addendum shows the comparable level of service at the study intersections
under the Original Project and the Revised Project. The analysis shows that
proposed driveway access under the Revised Project would not affect the level of
service at intersections located adjacent to the Plaza El Segundo Development
under the Revised Project.
In addition, a queueing analysis was conducted for both of the proposed
driveway locations to assess the adequacy of turn lane storage space at each
entrance. Table 4 in Appendix G to this Addendum provides delay in seconds
per vehicle and a summary of storage spaces required for the turn lanes at each
driveway entrance. Storage requirements range from Q to 44 feet, while storage
capacity within the project driveways ranges from 22 to 132 feet, with additional
storage provided within the parking areas. The analysis shows that the project
turn lanes provide adequate storage for vehicles entering and exiting the Plaza El
Segundo Development under the Revised Project.
The Certified EIR concluded that traffic associated with the Original Project would
result in cumulatively considerable impacts to a number of intersections
surrounding the project area. The intersections listed below would be
significantly impacted at the specified peak hour:
• Rosecrans Avenue and Hindry Avenue, p.m. peak hour
11
• Rosecrans Avenue and 1 -405 SB Off -ramp, a.m. and p.m. peak hour
• Marine Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard, a.m. and p.m. peak hour
• Marine Avenue and Aviation Boulevard, a.m. and p.m. peak hour
• Manhattan Beach Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard, a.m. and p.m.
peak hour
• Manhattan Beach Boulevard and Aviation Boulevard, a.m. and p.m. peak
hour
While the Original Project was identified as contributing to cumulative impacts in
the aforementioned areas, the Revised Project would not further exacerbate
these cumulative impacts. As discussed above, traffic generation of the Revised
Project would be equal to or less than the Original Project with respect to daily,
a.m. peak, p.m. peak and Saturday mid -day trips. Therefore the contribution of
the Revised Project to cumulative traffic effects would be the same as or less
than the Original Project.
L. Utilities
The Revised Project would generate increased demand for utilities (sewer, water,
solid waste, electricity, natural gas) that would be within the capacity of the
existing and proposed utilities. According to the Sewer Area Study by
Development Resources Consultants (see Appendix H to this Addendum), the
proposed 8 -inch PVC sewer main and the existing 12 -inch VCP sewer main
would adequately serve the proposed developments and the addition of the 8-
inch PVC sewer main would not negatively impact the existing capacity of the
overall sewer system maintained by the City of El Segundo. Impacts of the
Revised Project with respect to water infrastructure and service would be within
the parameters used to develop the water supply assessment for the EIR's
Sepulveda /Rosecrans Site Rezoning . The additional land use that would be
permitted under the proposed Zone Text Amendment (health and /or skin care
services) would be similar to the commercial, retail and restaurant uses presently
permitted under the C -4 zone. The additional use permitted under the Zone Text
Amendment would not represent a use that would result in water consumption
greater than the uses that are currently allowed under the C -4 zone. Additionally,
impacts of the Revised Project with respect to solid waste, natural gas, and
electricity would be within the parameters analyzed for the Sepulveda /Rosecrans
Site Rezoning and the proposed additional permitted use would have generation
and consumption characteristics similar to the uses that are currently allowed
under the C -4 zone. The certified EIR determined that with mitigation impacts of
the S/R and Original Projects would be less than significant for all of the
foregoing impacts. The same mitigation measures applicable to the utilities in
the Certified EIR would be applicable to the Revised Project, so there would be
no new or substantially more severe significant impacts.
The Certified EIR concluded that cumulatively considerable impacts with respect
to solid waste would occur with implementation of the S/R and Original Projects
12
and related projects because precise solutions to meeting the need for landfill
capacity are not known. While the Revised Project would result in a small
increase in solid waste generation compared to the Original Project, this increase
would not exceed the solid waste generation analyzed for the S/R Project nor be
sufficient to modify or accelerate the ongoing need to achieve long -term solutions
to regional solid waste disposal needs. Therefore the Revised Project would not
contribute to any new or substantially more severe cumulative impacts.
M. Cultural Resources
The certified EIR identified one historic resource or the S/R site and no other
cultural resources on either the Original or S/R sites. The identified cultural
resource is not located within this 3.4 acre area to be added to the Plaza El
Segundo Development. Impacts of the Revised Project with respect to cultural
resources would be the same as the Original Project. The same mitigation
measure identified in the Certified EIR would be applicable to the Revised Project
in the event that unknown archaeological or paleontological resources are
encountered.
III. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS.
The Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted by the City Council on March 1,
2005, pursuant to Resolution No. 4415 is hereby incorporated by reference. The
Statement of Overriding Considerations remains accurate and applicable to the
proposed approvals. All EIR mitigation measures will remain in effect.
IV. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The City Council hereby finds that none of the conditions identified by Public Resources
Code Section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 have occurred and the
Addendum has been completed in compliance with CEQA.
The City Council makes these findings based on its independent judgment after
reviewing and considering the Addendum and all of the evidence in the record, including
but not limited to, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and all written and
oral testimony presented.
P: \Planning & Building Safety\PROJECTS \751 - 775 \EA - 768 \Council Agenda Packet\ CC2008 .02.19\2008.02.19.EA- 768.CEQA
Resolution 4542 findings Exh A.doc
13
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542 Exhibit B
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 1417 Exhibit B
IX. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PROCEDURES
Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code requires a Lead Agency to adopt a "reporting or
monitoring program for the changes to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to
mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment" (Mitigation Monitoring Program, Section 15097
of the CEQA Guidelines provides additional direction on mitigation monitoring or reporting). The
Planning and Building Safety Department for the City of El Segundo is the Lead Agency for the
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza El Segundo Development.
An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared to address the potential environmental impacts of the
proposed project. Where appropriate, this environmental document identified project design features or
recommended mitigation measures to avoid or to reduce potentially significant environmental impacts of
the proposed project. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is designed to
monitor implementation of requirements for subsequent environmental documentation' and mitigation
measures identified for the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative
and the Plaza El Segundo Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative Development. The MMRP is subject
to review and approval by the Lead Agency as part of the certification of the EIR and adoption of project
conditions. The required subsequent environmental documentation and mitigation measures are listed
separately and categorized by impact area, with an accompanying identification of the following:
• Monitoring Phase, the phase of the project during which the mitigation measure must be
monitored;
Pre- Construction, including the design phase
- Construction
Post- Construction
• The Implementing Party, the agency with the power to implement the mitigation measure;
• The Enforcement Agency, the agency with the power to enforce the mitigation measure, and
In addition to mitigation measures, requirements for the preparation of'subsequent environmental analysis and
documentation are identified in the EIR. These requirements are intended to provide guidance for
environmental review offuture projects that would implement the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning, using the
Program EIR. Because these requirements would also work to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the
environment in accordance with PRC Section 21081.6, they have been included in this MMRP.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -I
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
• The Monitoring Agency, the agency to which reports involving feasibility, compliance,
implementation and development are made.
The MMRP performance must be monitored annually to determine the effectiveness of the measures
implemented in any given year and re- evaluate the mitigation needs for the upcoming year.
I. AESTHETICS
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
No subsequent environmental documentation is required for the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and
Plaza El Segundo Development.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
Impacts related to visual character and light and glare would be less than significant under the proposed
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza El Segundo Development. No mitigation measures are
required. However, the following measures are recommended as Conditions of Approval to ensure that
potential impacts from glare are less than significant.
B -1 Expansive areas of highly reflective materials, such as mirrored glass, must not be
permitted. Non - reflective building materials must be used to the maximum extent
possible to reduce potential glare impacts.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning and Building Safety Department
Monitoring Agency: Planning and Building Safety Department
B -2 Lighting must be designed to minimize off -site glare.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Plaza El Segundo Development
Pre - construction; Construction
Applicant
Planning and Building Safety Department
Planning and Building Safety Department
Impacts related to visual character and light and glare would be less than significant under the Plaza El
Segundo Development. No mitigation measures are required. However, the following measures are
recommended as Conditions of Approval to ensure that potential impacts from glare are less than
significant.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -2
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
B -3 Expansive areas of highly reflective materials, such as mirrored glass, must not be
permitted. Non- reflective building materials must be used to the maximum extent
possible to reduce potential glare impacts.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning and Building Safety Department
Monitoring Agency: Planning and Building Safety Department
B -4 Lighting must be designed to minimize off -site glare.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
II. AIR QUALITY
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
Pre - construction; Construction
Applicant
Planning and Building Safety Department
Planning and Building Safety Department
Subsequent environmental documentation must be prepared for any future development project proposed
within the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site to identify emissions associated with construction of that
specific development. The subsequent environmental documentation must address the following:
C -1 Prior to implementation of specific development projects, impacts associated with
construction emissions must be examined in light of this Program EIR to determine
whether a new Initial Study would be required to be prepared leading to either an EIR or
Negative Declaration. This examination must provide quantified estimates of
construction emissions based upon the specific site, schedule and construction equipment
utilization characteristics of the proposed development and compare the estimated
emissions to the SCAQMD thresholds for construction emissions. The analysis must
incorporate the mitigation measures identified below as appropriate, along with any other
mitigation measures identified by the project - specific analysis.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Roseerans Site Rezoning
C -1 Prior to implementation of specific development projects, impacts associated with
construction emissions must be examined. This examination must provide quantified
estimates of construction emissions based upon the specific site, schedule and
construction equipment utilization characteristics of the proposed development and
compare the estimated emissions to the SCAQMD thresholds for construction emissions.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -3
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
The analysis must incorporate the mitigation measures identified below as appropriate,
along with any other mitigation measures identified by the project - specific analysis.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning and Building Safety Department
Monitoring Agency: Planning and Building Safety Department
Construction
C -2 The construction area and vicinity (500 -foot radius) must be swept (preferably with water
sweepers) and watered at least twice daily. Site wetting must occur often enough to
maintain a 10 percent surface soil moisture content throughout all earth moving activities.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency:
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -3 All unpaved roads, parking and staging areas must be watered at least once every two
hours of active operation.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
C -4 Site access points must E
Construction
Applicant
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
e swept/washed within thirty minutes of visible dirt deposition.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency:
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -5 On -site stockpiles of debris, dirt or rusty materials must be covered or watered at least
twice daily.
Monitoring Phase: Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: South Coast Air Quality Management District
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -4
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Agency: Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -6 All haul trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials must either be covered or
maintain two feet of freeboard.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
C -7 All haul trucks must ha
cubic yards.
Construction
Applicant
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
ve a capacity of no less than twelve and three - quarter (12.75)
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency:
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -8 At least 80 percent of all inactive disturbed surface areas must be watered on a daily basis
when there is evidence o
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
f wind driven fugitive dust.
Construction
Applicant
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -9 Operations on any unpaved surfaces must be suspended when winds exceed 25 mph.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
C -10 Traffic speeds on unpave
Construction
Applicant
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
�d roads must be limited to 15 miles per hour.
Monitoring Phase: Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency: Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
,Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -5
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
C -11 Operations on any unpaved surfaces must be suspended during first and second stage
smog alerts.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency:
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -12 The applicant must develop and implement a construction management plan, as approved
by the City of El Segundo, which includes the following measures recommended by the
SCAQMD, or equivalently effective measures approved by the SCAQMD.
a. Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference.
b. Provide temporary traffic controls during all phases of construction activities to
maintain traffic flow (e.g., flag person).
c. Schedule construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system to off -
peak hours to the degree practicable.
d. Re -route construction trucks away from congested streets.
e. Consolidate truck deliveries when possible.
f. Provide dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment on-
and off -site.
g. Maintain equipment and vehicle engines in good condition and in proper tune as per
manufacturer's specifications and per SCAQMD rules, to minimize exhaust
emissions.
h. Suspend use of all construction equipment operations during second stage smog
alerts. Contact SCAQMD at (800) 242 -4022 for daily forecasts.
i. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel- or gasoline - powered
generators.
j. Use methanol- or natural gas - powered mobile equipment and pile drivers instead of
diesel if readily available at competitive prices.
k. Use propane- or butane - powered on -site mobile equipment instead of gasoline if
readily available at competitive prices.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Playa IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -6
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Plaza El Segundo Development
Construction
Pre - construction; Construction
Applicant
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -13 The construction area and vicinity (500 -foot radius) must be swept (preferably with water
sweepers) and watered at least twice daily. Site wetting must occur often enough to
maintain a 10 percent surface soil moisture content throughout all earth moving activities.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency:
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -14 All unpaved roads, parking and staging areas must be watered at least once every two
hours of active operation.
Monitoring Phase: Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency: Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -15 Site access points must be swept /washed within thirty minutes of visible dirt deposition.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency:
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -16 On -site stockpiles of debris, dirt or rusty materials must be covered or watered at least
twice daily.
Monitoring Phase: Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: South Coast Air Quality Management District
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -7
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Agency: Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -17 All haul trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials must either be covered or
maintain two feet of freeboard.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency:
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -18 All haul trucks must have a capacity of no less than twelve and three - quarter (12.75)
cubic yards.
Monitoring Phase: Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency: Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -19 At least 80 percent of all inactive disturbed surface areas must be watered on a daily basis
when there is evidence of wind driven fugitive dust.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
C -20 Operations on any unpa%
Construction
Applicant
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
,ed surfaces must be suspended when winds exceed 25 mph.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency:
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -21 Traffic speeds on unpaved roads must be limited to 15 miles per hour.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency:
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -8
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
C -22 Operations on any unpaved surfaces must be suspended during first and second stage
smog alerts.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency:
Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
C -23 The applicant must develop and implement a construction management plan, as approved
by the City of El Segundo, which includes the following measures recommended by the
SCAQMD, or equivalently effective measures approved by the SCAQMD.
a. Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference.
b. Provide temporary traffic controls during all phases of construction activities to
maintain traffic flow (e.g., flag person).
c. Schedule construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system to off-
peak hours to the degree practicable.
d. Re -route construction trucks away from congested streets.
e. Consolidate truck deliveries when possible.
f. Provide dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment on-
and off -site.
g. Maintain equipment and vehicle engines in good condition and in proper tune as per
manufacturer's specifications and per SCAQMD rules, to minimize exhaust
emissions.
h. Suspend use of all construction equipment operations during second stage smog
alerts. Contact SCAQMD at (800) 242 -4022 for daily forecasts.
i. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel- or gasoline - powered
generators.
j. Use methanol- or natural gas - powered mobile equipment and pile drivers instead of
diesel if readily available at competitive prices.
k. Use propane- or butane - powered on -site mobile equipment instead of gasoline if
readily available at competitive prices.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -9
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency: Planning and Building Safety Department; Public Works
Department
III. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
Subsequent environmental documentation must be prepared for any proposed development project that
includes the northwest corner of the proposed Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site that has been identified
as potentially containing 0.30 acres of jurisdictional wetlands area under the jurisdiction of LARWQCB.
Impacts to any jurisdictional wetlands that may exist in this area must be examined, at the time the
development project is proposed, in light of the Program EIR to determine whether a new Initial Study
would be required to be prepared leading to either an EIR or Negative Declaration. The subsequent
environmental documentation must address the following:
D -1 A site specific analysis must be conducted to determine whether the design of the
proposed development project would impact any of the 0.30 acres identified as potential
jurisdictional wetlands. This analysis shall be completed prior to the start of construction
activities for any proposed development within the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site.
If jurisdictional wetlands would be affected by the development project, measures shall
be identified to reduce impacts to less than significant levels.
Subsequent environmental documentation must also be prepared for any proposed development project
within the proposed Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site to determine the presence /absence of sensitive
species. This information must be examined, at the time the development project is proposed, in light of
the Program EIR to determine whether a new Initial Study would be required to be prepared leading to
either an EIR or Negative Declaration. The subsequent environmental documentation must address the
following:
D -2 Site specific analysis of potential effects to four sensitive bird species (white tailed kite,
loggerhead shrike, burrowing owl and Belding's savannah sparrow) must be conducted
prior to the start of construction activities for any proposed development within the
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site. If any of these sensitive species would be affected
by the proposed development, measures must be identified to reduce impacts to these
species to less than significant levels, including, but not limited to, on -site monitoring by
a qualified biologist during grading and /or construction activities.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX - -10
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
In the preparation of subsequent environmental documentation, as described above, it is not necessary to
re -survey any area that has already been addressed in this EIR or may be surveyed in the course of
preparing subsequent environmental documentation for later projects.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
D -l. A site specific analysis must be conducted to determine whether the design of the
proposed development project would impact any of the 0.30 acres identified as potential
jurisdictional wetlands. This analysis shall be completed prior to the start of construction
activities for any proposed development within the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site.
If jurisdictional wetlands would be affected by the development project, measures shall
be identified to reduce impacts to less than significant levels.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
D -2. Site specific analysis of potential effects to four sensitive bird species (white tailed kite,
loggerhead shrike, burrowing owl and Belding's savannah sparrow) must be conducted
prior to the start of construction activities for any proposed development within the
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site. If any of these sensitive species would be affected
by the proposed development, measures must be identified to reduce impacts to these
species to less than significant levels, including, but not limited to, on -site monitoring by
a qualified biologist during grading and /or construction activities.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
California Department of Fish and Game
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
D -3. All construction personnel must receive copies of all pertinent mitigation measures to
reduce impacts to general biological resources and must be instructed on avoiding
adverse impacts to birds encountered on -site.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Planning Division
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -I1
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
D -4. Prior to site remediation or construction grading on parts of the Site where burrowing
owls may occur, a qualified biologist must be retained to conduct surveys for burrowing
owl to determine if it is resident on -site. Surveys must be conducted no more than 30
days prior to commencement of such activities. If burrowing owl is determined to be
resident, a qualified biologist must oversee site remediation and demolition activities in
and around any semi- natural areas which could be occupied by burrowing owl. Proposed
mitigation measures must be presented to the California Department of Fish and Game
and /or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for approval to avoid directly harming the owl if it
is present on -site during these activities.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: California Department of Fish and Game; United States
Fish and Wildlife Service
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division
Plaza El Segundo Development
D -5. All construction personnel must receive copies of all pertinent mitigation measures to
reduce impacts to general biological resources and must be instructed on avoiding
adverse impacts to birds encountered on -site.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning Division
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division
D -6. Prior to site remediation or construction grading on parts of the Site where burrowing
owls may occur, a qualified biologist must be retained to conduct surveys for burrowing
owl to determine if it is resident on -site. Surveys must be conducted no more than 30
days prior to commencement of such activities. If burrowing owl is determined to be
resident, a qualified biologist must oversee site remediation and demolition activities in
and around any semi - natural areas which could be occupied by burrowing owl. Proposed
mitigation measures must be presented to the California Department of Fish and Game
and /or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for approval to avoid directly harming the owl if it
is present on -site during
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
these activities.
Pre - construction; Construction
Applicant
California Department of Fish and Game; United States
Fish and Wildlife Service
Planning Division
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -12
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
D -7. Prior to issuance of building permits, evidence must be provided to the City of El
Segundo that all necessary approvals for any wetland dredge /fill contemplated by such
permit have been obtained from the Regional Water Quality Control Board — Los
Angeles Region or equivalent documentation, or a waiver stating that no permit is
presently required pursuant to the regulations of that agency. If required, conditions for
permit approval by LARWQCB must include, but may not be limited to the following:
• Mitigation of any unavoidable impacts to wetland values and functions to the
satisfaction of the permitting agency;
• Incorporation of buffers to the wetland areas;
• On -site treatment of runoff to improve water quality; and
• Compliance with best management practices during construction.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
IV. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
Pre - construction
Applicant
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
Planning Division
Subsequent environmental documentation must be prepared for any proposed development on the
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site to determine the presence or absence of methane. The subsequent
environmental documentation must address the following:
E -1 A methane study must be conducted to determine the levels at which methane is or is not
present in the area of any proposed development. If methane is determined to be present
at or above levels which require action, then the report must include recommendations
and mitigation measures which must be followed.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
E -1 A methane study must be conducted to determine the levels at which methane is or is not
present in the area of any proposed development. If methane is determined to be present
at or above levels which require action, then the report must include recommendations
and mitigation measures which must be followed.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -13
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning and Building Safety Department
Monitoring Agency: Building Safety Division
E -2 All soil disturbance and travel on unpaved surfaces must be suspended if winds exceed
25 miles per hour.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Plaza El Segundo Development
Construction
Applicant
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
E -3 All soil disturbance and travel on unpaved surfaces must be suspended if winds exceed
25 miles per hour.
Monitoring Phase: Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: South Coast Air Quality Management District
Monitoring Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
V. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
No subsequent environmental documentation is required.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
Construction
F -1. The applicant must prepare hydrology studies for each specific development on the
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site. Such studies must be reviewed and approved by the
City of El Segundo and any other applicable agency.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -14
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
F -2. The applicant must prepare runoff studies for each specific development on the
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site so that the runoff from one specific project area
would not flow onto another specific project area without the owners consent. Such
studies must be reviewed and approved by the City of El Segundo and any other
applicable agency.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
F -3. The applicant must prepare a master drainage plan for each specific development on the
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site. This plan must include detailed
hydrology /hydraulic calculations and drainage improvements, showing quantitatively
how the project will eliminate the potential for downstream flooding due to increased
storm water runoff. These plans will also identify the proposed BMPs to be implemented
in compliance with the requirements of the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan
and the ESMC. Such plans must be reviewed and approved by the City of el Segundo
and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
F -4. The applicant must design, for each specific development on the Sepulveda/Rosecrans
Rezoning Site, a conveyance and detainment system to meet the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works limits on the storm drains that would convey the
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site's discharge.
Monitoring Phase: Pre- construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
F -5. The proposed Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza El Segundo Development
must comply with the City of El Segundo Ordinance No. 1347 and No. 1348, which
establishes storm water and urban pollution controls.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction; Post - Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -15
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Operation
F -6. The project owner /developer of a specific development (e.g., Plaza E1 Segundo) on the
Sepulveda/Rosecrans site must maintain all structural or treatment control BMPs for the
life of the project.
Monitoring Phase: Post- construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department; E1
Segundo Fire Department
Monitoring Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department; El
Segundo Fire Department
Plaza El Segundo Development
Construction
F -7. The applicant must prepare a hydrology study for the Plaza El Segundo site. The study
must be reviewed and approved by the City of E1 Segundo and any other applicable
agencies.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
F -8. The applicant must prepare a runoff study for the Plaza El Segundo site so that the runoff
does not flow onto another area without the owners consent. The study must be reviewed
and approved by the City of El Segundo and any other applicable agencies.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
F -9. The applicant must prepare a master drainage plan for the Plaza El Segundo site. This
plan must include detailed hydrology /hydraulic calculations and drainage improvements,
showing quantitatively how the project will eliminate the potential for downstream
flooding due to increased storm water runoff. These plans will also identify the proposed
BMPs to be implemented in compliance with the requirements of the Standard Urban
Storm Water Mitigation Plan and the ESMC. Such plans must be reviewed and approved
by the City of El Segundo and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX- 16
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
F -10. The applicant must design a conveyance and detainment system to meet the City of El
Segundo's and Los Angeles County Department of Public Works limits on the storm
drains that would convey the Plaza El Segundo site's discharge.
Monitoring Phase: Pre- construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
F -11. The proposed Plaza El Segundo Development must comply with the City of El Segundo
Ordinance No. 1347 and No. 1348, which establishes storm water and urban pollution
controls.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction; Post - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
Operation
F -12. The project owner /developer must maintain all structural or treatment control BMPs for
the life of the Plaza El Segundo Development.
Monitoring Phase: Post - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; El Segundo Fire Department
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department; El Segundo Fire Department
VI. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
Subsequent environmental documentation must be prepared for any proposed development project within
the proposed Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site. Conditions related to soil and groundwater
contamination must be examined for the proposed development site, at the time the development project
is proposed, in light of the Program EIR to determine whether a new Initial Study would be required to be
prepared leading to either an EIR or Negative Declaration. The subsequent environmental documentation
must address the following:
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -17
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
G -1. A full characterization of all the parcels that comprise that project site must be
undertaken. The City must require that this process be initiated by requiring the project
applicant to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) or equivalent
investigation and analysis for the specific project site that would be occupied by the
proposed development. The Phase I ESA or equivalent document must be prepared by a
licensed professional (Registered Environmental Assessor or equivalent) and submitted
to the City for review.
G -2. If indicated by the initial investigation, the City must require the preparation of
subsequent Phase II investigation(s) and submission to the Los Angeles Regional Water
Quality Control Board and /or other appropriate agency. The project applicant must
provide to the City copies of all materials submitted to the LARWQCB or any other
regulatory agency.
G -3. Remediation of any environmental conditions identified in the Phase I and Phase 11 site
assessments or investigations must be accomplished to the standards established and
agreed upon by the appropriate regulatory agency(ies) for the contemplated development,
prior to the issuance of grading or building permits for the project. The project applicant
must provide to the City copies of any materials received from the LARWQCB or any
other regulatory agency.
G -4. If the future development project would include any part of the Sepulveda/Rosecrans
Rezoning Site that currently contains structures, an asbestos and lead survey must be
conducted to determine the presence or absence of these substances. Removal of these
substances must be conducted in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
G -1. A full characterization of all the parcels that comprise that project site must be
undertaken. The City must require that this process be initiated by requiring the project
applicant to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) or equivalent
investigation and analysis for the specific project site that would be occupied by the
proposed development. The Phase I ESA or equivalent document must be prepared by a
licensed professional (Registered Environmental Assessor or equivalent) and submitted
to the City for review.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Pre - construction
Applicant
Planning Division; El Segundo Fire Department
Planning Division
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX - -18
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
G -2. If indicated by the initial investigation, the City must require the preparation of
subsequent Phase If investigation(s) and submission to the Los Angeles Regional Water
Quality Control Board and /or other appropriate agency. The project applicant must
provide to the City copies of all materials submitted to the I,ARWQCB or any other
regulatory agency.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Pre - construction
Applicant
Los Angeles Regional
Planning Division
Planning Division
Water Quality Control Board;
G -3. Remediation of any environmental conditions identified in the Phase I and Phase II site
assessments or investigations must be accomplished to the standards established and
agreed upon by the appropriate regulatory agency(ies) for the contemplated development,
prior to the issuance of grading or building permits for the project. The project applicant
must provide to the City copies of any materials received from the LARWQCB or any
other regulatory agency.
Monitoring Phase: Pre- construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning Division; Los Angeles Regional Water Quality
Control Board
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division
G -4. If the future development project would include any part of the Sepulveda/Rosecrans
Rezoning Site that currently contains structures, an asbestos and lead survey must be
conducted to determine the presence or absence of these substances. Removal of these
substances must be conducted in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Building Safety Division
Monitoring Agency:
Building Safety Division
Plaza El Segundo Development
G -5. Remedial investigations, health risk assessments for the contemplated development and
soils remedial action plans for the Plaza El Segundo portion of the project site must be
completed and approved to the standards established and agreed upon in conjunction with
the LARWQCB prior to the start of any project activities. The project applicant must
provide to the City copies of any materials received from the LARWQCB or any other
regulatory agency.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -19
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Planning Division; Los Angeles Regional Water Quality
Control Board
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
G -6. Remediation of shallow soil of the Plaza El Segundo Development site must be
accomplished to the standards for commercial development established and agreed upon
in conjunction with the LARWQCB and a shallow soil closure letter must be issued by
the LARWQCB prior to the issuance of grading permits for construction of the proposed
Plaza El Segundo Development. The project applicant must provide to the City copies of
any materials received from the LARWQCB or any other regulatory agency.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Planning Division; Los Angeles Regional Water Quality
Control Board
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
VII. LAND USE
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
No subsequent environmental documentation is required.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
No mitigation measures are required.
Plaza El Segundo Development
No mitigation measures are required.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -20
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
VIII. NOISE
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
Subsequent environmental documentation must be prepared for development projects proposed to be
constructed on the Sepulveda/Rosecrans site. The subsequent environmental documentation must address
the following:
I -1 A project - specific construction noise analysis must be prepared that calculates, based on
project - specific parameters and identification of the site - specific sensitive receptors that
could be affected by construction activities, the noise levels that would be experienced at
sensitive receptors located adjacent to that site. If noise levels resulting from
construction activity would result in temporary construction noise levels that exceed 65
dBA at a sensitive receptor, or cause an incremental increase of 5 dBA over the existing
ambient sound level, if the existing ambient sound level at the sensitive receptor location
is 65 dBA or more, then the study must identify feasible mitigation measures to be
applied to that project from the list of mitigation measures provided below.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
I -1 A project - specific construction noise analysis must be prepared that calculates, based on
project - specific parameters and identification of the site - specific sensitive receptors that
could be affected by construction activities, the noise levels that would be experienced at
sensitive receptors located adjacent to that site. If noise levels resulting from
construction activity would result in temporary construction noise levels that exceed 65
dBA at a sensitive receptor, or cause an incremental increase of 5 dBA over the existing
ambient sound level, if the existing ambient sound level at the sensitive receptor location
is 65 dBA or more, then the study must identify feasible mitigation measures to be
applied to that project from the list of mitigation measures provided below.
• Construction contracts must specify that all construction equipment must be equipped
with mufflers and other applicable noise attenuation devices.
• During construction phases, the contractor must store and maintain equipment as far
as possible from the adjacent receptor property locations to the southwest, north, and
east of the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site.
• As stated in the City of El Segundo Municipal Code, construction must be restricted
to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Saturday, and prohibited at
anytime on Sunday or a Federal holiday.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -21
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
• Temporary plywood noise barriers must be constructed along the property lines of
the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site during construction, which must be high
enough to block the line -of -site between the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site and
receptor property locations to the southwest, north, and east.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Plaza El Segundo Development
Pre - construction; Construction
Applicant
Planning Division
Planning Division
I -2 Construction contracts must specify that all construction equipment must be equipped
with mufflers and other applicable noise attenuation devices.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Planning Division
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
I -3 During construction phases, the contractor must store and maintain equipment as far as
possible from the adjacent receptor property locations to the north and east of the Plaza
El Segundo Site.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Planning Division
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
I -4 As stated in the City of El Segundo Municipal Code, construction must be restricted to
the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Saturday, and prohibited at anytime on
Sunday or a Federal holiday.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Building Safety Division
Monitoring Agency:
Building Safety Divsion
I -5 Temporary plywood noise barriers must be constructed along the property lines of the 4.5
net acre portion of the Plaza El Segundo site south of the UPRR tracks during
construction, which must be high enough to block the line -of -site (a minimum of 8 feet
above existing grade) between the Plaza El Segundo site and receptor property locations
to the southwest, north, and east.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -22
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Construction
Applicant
Planning Division
Building Safety Division
IX. POPULATION, HOUSING, AND EMPLOYMENT
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
No subsequent environmental documentation is required.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
No mitigation measures are required.
Plaza El Segundo Development
No mitigation measures are required.
X. PUBLIC SERVICES
Fire Protection
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
No subsequent environmental documentation is required.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
K.1 -1 The applicant must pay the City of El Segundo a Fire Service Mitigation Fee of $0.14 per
gross square foot of building area prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Planning Division
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
K.1 -2 A fire life safety plan, which must include definitive plans and specifications, must be
submitted to the El Segundo Fire Department (ESFD) for review and approval prior to
commencement of construction of any portion of the proposed development.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -23
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Pre - construction
Applicant
El Segundo Fire Department
E1 Segundo Fire Department
K.1-3 The applicant must provide fire access roadways to and throughout the property and
submit a layout plan to the ESFD for approval.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Pre - construction
Applicant
El Segundo Fire Department
El Segundo Fire Department
K.14 The applicant must provide water flow and on -site fire hydrants as required by the ESFD.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction; Post - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; El Segundo Fire Department
Monitoring Agency: El Segundo Fire Department
K.1 -5 The following installations require separate Fire Department approval. The applicant
must submit separate plans for Fire Department review:
• Automatic fire sprinklers;
• Fire alarm system;
• Underground fire service mains;
• Fire pumps;
• Emergency generators; and
• Any aboveground or underground storage tank including elevator sumps and
condensation tanks.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Plaza El Segundo Development
Pre - construction
Applicant
El Segundo Fire Department
El Segundo Fire Department
K.1 -6 The applicant must pay the City of El Segundo a Fire Service Mitigation Fee of $0.14 per
gross square foot of building area prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -24
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Planning Division
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
K.1-7 A fire life safety plan, which must include definitive plans and specifications, must be
submitted to the El Segundo Fire Department (ESFD) for review and approval prior to
commencement of construction of any portion of the proposed development.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Pre - construction
Applicant
El Segundo Fire Department
El Segundo Fire Department
K.1 -8 The applicant must provide fire access roadways throughout the property and submit a
layout plan to the ESFD for approval.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Pre - construction
Applicant
El Segundo Fire Department
El Segundo Fire Department
K.1 -9 The applicant must provide water flow and on -site fire hydrants as required by the ESFD.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction; Post - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; El Segundo Fire Department
Monitoring Agency: El Segundo Fire Department
K.1-10 The following installations require separate Fire Department approval. The applicant
must submit separate plans for Fire Department review:
• Automatic fire sprinklers;
• Fire alarm system;
• Underground fire service mains;
• Fire pumps;
• Emergency generators; and
• Any aboveground or underground storage tank including elevator sumps and
condensation tanks.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -25
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Police Protection
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
Pre - construction
Applicant
El Segundo Fire Department
El Segundo Fire Department
No subsequent environmental documentation is required.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
K.2 -1 The applicant must pay the City of El Segundo a Police Service Mitigation Fee of $0.1 1
per gross square foot of building area prior to the occupancy of each building.
Monitoring Phase: Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning Division
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division
K.2 -2 A strategic security plan, which must include definitive plans and specifications, must be
submitted to the El Segundo Police Department (ESPD) for review and approval prior to
commencement of construction of any portion of the proposed Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site
Rezoning and Plaza El Segundo Development. The strategic security plan must include,
but not be limited to, the following item:
• Depending upon the size of the structure and its location in relation to the streets, the
size of the displayed address may vary from a minimum of 4" to as much as 24 ".
• Building entrances and exits must be limited in number and located in a manner to
increase security and visibility of the building.
• All landscaping must be low profile especially around perimeter fencing, windows,
doors and entryways taking special care not to limit visibility and provide climbing
access.
• Adequate street, walkway, building and parking lot lighting must be provided to
enhance security.
• Provisions for on -site security personnel.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page 1X - -26
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Plaza El Segundo Development
Pre - construction
Applicant
El Segundo Police Department
E1 Segundo Police Department
K.2 -3 The applicant must pay the City of El Segundo a Police Service Mitigation Fee of $0.11
per gross square foot of building area prior to the occupancy of each building.
Monitoring Phase: Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning Division
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division
K.2 -4 A strategic security plan, which must include definitive plans and specifications, must be
submitted to the El Segundo Police Department (ESPD) for review and approval prior to
commencement of construction of any portion of the proposed Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site
Rezoning and Plaza El Segundo Development. The strategic security plan must include,
but not be limited to, the following item:
• Depending upon the size of the structure and its location in relation to the streets, the
size of the displayed address may vary from a minimum of 4" to as much as 24 ".
• Building entrances and exits must be limited in number and located in a manner to
increase security and visibility of the building.
• All landscaping must be low profile especially around perimeter fencing, windows,
doors and entryways taking special care not to limit visibility and provide climbing
access.
• Adequate street, walkway, building and parking lot lighting must be provided to
enhance security.
• Provisions for on -site security personnel.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: El Segundo Police Department
Monitoring Agency: El Segundo Police Department
XI. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -27
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February• 2005
No subsequent environmental documentation is required.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
Physical Roadway Improvements
L -1 El Segundo Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard. Convert the existing eastbound right -
turn only lane to a shared through /right -turn lane. There exists three receiving lanes on
the east leg of the intersection. In addition, modify the raised center median to convert
the westbound shared through left -turn lane to a dedicated second left turn lane and
additional through lane.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Caltrans
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department; Caltrans
L -2 El Segundo Boulevard and Aviation Boulevard. Not required for Sepulveda/Rosecrans
Site Rezoning Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative.
L -3 Park Place and Nash Street. Provide a new traffic signal at this location. Widen and
restripe the eastbound and westbound directions to provide one left -turn lane, one
through lane, and one right -turn only lane.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre- construction; Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency:
Public Works Department
L -4 Park Place and Douglas Street. Provide a new traffic signal at this location.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency:
Public Works Department
L -5 Rosecrans Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard. On the westbound approach of Rosecrans
Avenue dedicate additional right -of -way on the north side of Rosecrans Avenue to
provide a free flow right -turn lane and third left -turn lane. Sepulveda Boulevard south of
Rosecrans Avenue may need to be widened to accommodate the third left -turn lane,
depending on the specific design of this lane. This widening could take place within the
existing Sepulveda Boulevard right -of -way. Widen the east side of Sepulveda Boulevard
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -28
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
along the project frontage to provide the acceptance lane for the free westbound right -
turn lane. This additional lane on Sepulveda should be improved to the new Park Place
connection where a right turn lane will be provided. This intersection's jurisdiction is
shared with Manhattan Beach and Caltrans. Coordination and concurrence of these
agencies for implementation of these improvements would be required.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Public Works Department; Caltrans; City of Manhattan
Beach Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency:
Public Works Department; Caltrans; City of Manhattan
Beach Public Works Department
L -6 Rosecrans Avenue and Continental Way. Not required for Depulveda/Rosecrans Site
Rezoning Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative.
L -7 Rosecrans Avenue and Douglas Street. On the westbound approach, widen the north side
of Rosecrans Avenue to provide a dedicated westbound right -turn lane. This
intersection's jurisdiction is shared with Manhattan Beach. Coordination and
concurrence of this agency for implementation of this improvement would be required.
This improvement is included as part of the current Rosecrans /Aviation Widening
(discussed above under "Future Highway System Improvements ") but will be guaranteed
by the project.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; City of Manhattan Beach
Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department; City of Manhattan Beach
Public Works Department
Site Trip Reductions
L -8 Project applicants must promote rideshare programs (bikes, rideshare matching and
transit options) as required by the City of El Segundo Transportation Demand
Management Program (TDM). In addition to the traditional TDM program, project
applicants must promote access to the Commute View System which is being
implemented by the City to provide information on congested routes to provide
additional trip reduction measures. The Commute View System is an advanced traveler
information system which provides real time travel time information, incident
information, and general traffic conditions through a variety of devices such as the cable,
internet, cell phone and wireless PDA. This will provide commuters the ability to make
informed decisions regarding the route, time of travel and mode of transportation.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -29
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Project applicants must include or share in a transit connection system to promote use of
the existing Metro Green Line service, remote employee lot during seasonal peaks and
local circulator service. Based upon estimate usage patterns and trial studies, an
approximately three percent reduction in trips to and from the site during peak periods is
anticipated with these enhancements.
Monitoring Phase: Post - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Planning Division
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department; Planning Division
Intelligent Transportation Systems Connections /Upgrades
L -9 The South Bay area will be enhanced with an area -wide signal system upgrade prior to
project completion in 2012. This system is already funded and will be implemented with
or without the proposed project. The improvement will provide for intelligent
transportation systems (ITS) which provide real time adjustment to signal timing based
upon current conditions thereby increasing capacity along major corridors. ITS system
enhancements are currently being tested and evaluated which provide further enhanced
capacity. These enhancements provide advanced communication upgrades to the users
of the roadway systems. Items include Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS)
and Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS). ATIS provides commuters with
information to make route and time of day decisions. The enhanced ATIS system that
would be included within the South Bay ITS system will enable private sector partners to
disseminate freeway and arterial traffic information to the public via paid subscription
services. ATMS manages the traffic system on surrounding streets.
Applicants for development projects within the proposed Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning
Site must provide for connectivity to the systems described above. Project applicants
must provide access to information disseminated by the ATIS system to patrons and
employees by including at least one television monitor or equivalent equipment that is
compatible with and connected to the ATIS system and that displays current commuter
information from the ATIS system during all hours that the development is open for
business. The monitor or equivalent equipment shall be placed in a centralized location
within the development, shall be specifically identified on directory maps of the facility,
shall be specifically and clearly identified as the location for obtaining current travel
information and shall be identified elsewhere throughout the development with signage
that directs patrons to the location.
Project applicants must also facilitate dissemination of information provided by the
ATIS system to project employees by working with project tenants to offer fully or
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -30
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
partially subsidized monthly subscriptions to employees (currently estimated at full cost
of $5.00 per month per user). Project applicants (or successors in interest) must provide
any new project tenant with information regarding subscription programs available to
employees and costs thereof and shall encourage tenants to provide subsidized monthly
subscriptions to their employees. However, because there is no guarantee that
subscription subsidies will be provided by future tenants of developments within the
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site, no additional credit for these subscriptions can be
taken except for the enhancements provided by the South Bay ITS system as presently
designed (7 %, see discussion under "Future Highway System Improvements" above).
Monitoring Phase: Construction; Post - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Planning Division; Los
Angeles County Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department; Planning Division; Los
Angeles County Public Works Department
Local Street - Freeway Inter -Ties
L -10 This mitigation measure is applicable to buildout of the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning
Site beyond the Plaza E1 Segundo Project Development. Applicants for development
projects within the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site (excluding the Plaza El Segundo
Project) shall fund or construct upgrades and enhancements to the El Segundo and /or
South Bay ITS systems, and /or the Caltrans ITS system that singly or in combination
cause an increase of 3% in the capacity of the street system served by these ITS systems.
The 3% increase shall be measured from the calculated capacity of the system based
upon existing lane configurations, plus a 10% increase on street in the City of El
Segundo, and 7% increase on streets outside the City of El Segundo to reflect the El
Segundo and South Bay ITS systems, respectively. The upgrades /enhancements shall be
selected from the following menu and approved by the relevant jurisdictional agency:
expansion of the fiber optic communication system, expansion of wireless
communication components, provision of software components, supplemental advance
system detectors, changeable message signs, closed circuit television cameras, or any
other reasonably feasible upgrade or enhancement approved by the relevant jurisdictional
agency. The applicant shall participate in any applicable fair share fee mitigation
program that will otherwise fund the foregoing upgrades /enhancements and shall receive
credit for all fair share payments.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Caltrans; County of Los
Angeles Department of Public Works
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -31
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department; Caltrans; County of Los
Angeles Department of Public Works
Project Parking /Egress Information System for Key Access /Egress Corridors
L -11 Project applicants must provide parking/egress information systems in the manner of
Changeable Message Signs (CMS) along key access /egress corridors of Sepulveda
Boulevard, Rosecrans Avenue, and Park Place. Currently, Los Angeles County is
installing CMS on major streets in the South Bay area and locations for additional CMS
would be identified in coordination with Los Angeles County. A centrally located kiosk
system must be included in project design that can disseminate roadway conditions along
the major routes. This information would be utilized by the employee or patron to
determine the least congested access /egress route to /from the project, thereby minimizing
delay on the roadway systems. Based upon recent studies in the South Bay area under
trial conditions, implementation of this measure is anticipated to improve capacity at the
site adjacent intersections by three percent, along major corridors of Rosecrans Avenue,
Sepulveda Boulevard, and EI Segundo Boulevard by two percent, and the balance of the
study intersections by one percent.
Monitoring Phase: Construction; Post - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Planning Division
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department; Planning Division
Improvements for Cumulative Growth
L -12 In order to assist in addressing future cumulative traffic deterioration, the City of El
Segundo through its Traffic Congestion Mitigation Fee Ordinance will require the
developer of a specific project to make a "fair share" contribution for programmed
roadway improvements. In addition, project implementation of the signal system
enhancements described above will benefit the entire system and reduce cumulative
impacts along the roadway corridors.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning Division; Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division; Public Works Department
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -32
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Plaza El Segundo Development
Physical Roadway Improvements
L -13 El Segundo Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard — Convert the existing eastbound right -
turn only lane to a shared through /right -turn lane. There exists three receiving lanes on
the east leg of the intersection. In addition, modify the raised center median to convert
the westbound shared through left -turn lane to a dedicated second left turn lane and
additional through lane.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Caltrans
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department; Caltrans
L -14 El Segundo Boulevard and Aviation Boulevard — Not required for Plaza El Segundo
Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative
L -15 Rosecrans Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard — On the westbound approach of Rosecrans
Avenue dedicate additional right -of -way on the north side of Rosecrans Avenue to
provide a free flow right -turn lane. Widen the east side of Sepulveda Boulevard along
the project frontage to provide the acceptance lane for the free westbound right -turn lane.
This additional lane on Sepulveda should be improved to the new Park Place connection
where a right turn lane will be provided. This intersection's jurisdiction is shared with
Manhattan Beach and Caltrans. Coordination and concurrence of these agencies for
implementation of these improvements would be required.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Caltrans
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department; Caltrans
L -16 Rosecrans Avenue and Continental Way — Not required for Plaza El Segundo Reduced
Traffic Generation Alternative.
Site Trip Reductions
L -17 The project applicant must promote rideshare programs (bikes, rideshare matching, and
transit options) as required by the City of El Segundo Transportation Demand
Management Program (TDM). In addition to the tradition TDM program and to provide
additional trip reduction measures, the project applicant must promote access to the
Commuter View System which is being implemented by the City to provide information
on congested routes. The project applicant must provide a transit connection system
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -33
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
must be established and/or shared with other nearby retail projects to promote use of the
existing Metro Green Line service, remote employee lot during seasonal peaks and local
circulator service. Based upon typical usage patterns, an approximately three percent
reduction in trips to and from the site during peak periods is anticipated with these
enhancements.
Monitoring Phase: Post - Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Planning Division
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department; Planning Division
Intelligent Transportation System Connections /Upgrades
L -18 The South Bay area will be enhanced with an area -wide signal system upgrade prior to
project completion in 2012. This system is already funded and will be implemented with
or without the proposed project. The improvement will provide for intelligent
transportation systems (ITS) which provide real time adjustment to signal timing based
upon current conditions thereby increasing capacity along major corridors. ITS system
enhancements are currently being tested and evaluated which provide further enhanced
capacity. These enhancements provide advanced communication upgrades to the users
of the roadway systems. Items include Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS)
and Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS). ATIS provides commuters with
information to make route and time of day decisions. The enhanced ATIS system that
would be included within the South Bay ITS system will enable private sector partners to
disseminate freeway and arterial traffic information to the public via paid subscription
services. ATMS manages the traffic system on surrounding streets.
Applicants for development projects within the proposed Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning
Site must provide for connectivity to the systems described above. Project applicants
must provide access to information disseminated by the ATIS system to patrons and
employees by including at least one television monitor or equivalent equipment that is
compatible with and connected to the ATIS system and that displays current commuter
information from the ATIS system during all hours that the development is open for
business. The monitor or equivalent equipment shall be placed in a centralized location
within the development, shall be specifically identified on directory maps of the facility,
shall be specifically and clearly identified as the location for obtaining current travel
information and shall be identified elsewhere throughout the development with signage
that directs patrons to the location.
Project applicants must also facilitate dissemination of information provided by the
ATIS system to project employees by working with project tenants to offer fully or
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -34
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
partially subsidized monthly subscriptions to employees (currently estimated at full cost
of $5.00 per month per user). Project applicants (or successors in interest) must provide
any new project tenant with information regarding subscription programs available to
employees and costs thereof and shall encourage tenants to provide subsidized monthly
subscriptions to their employees. However, because there is no guarantee that
subscription subsidies will be provided by future tenants of developments within the
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site, no additional credit for these subscriptions can be
taken except for the enhancements provided by the South Bay ITS system as presently
designed (7 %, see discussion under "Future Highway System Improvements" above).
Monitoring Phase: Construction; Post - Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Planning Division; Los
Angeles County Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department; Planning Division; Los
Angeles County Public Works Department
Improvements for Cumulative Growth
L -19 In order to assist in addressing future cumulative traffic deterioration, the project
applicant must comply with the City of El Segundo Traffic Congestion Mitigation
Fee Ordinance and make a "fair share" contribution for programmed roadway
improvements. In addition, project implementation of the signal system
enhancements described above will benefit the entire system and reduce cumulative
impacts along the roadway corridors.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
XII. UTILITIES
Sewer
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
Pre - construction
Applicant
Planning Division; Public Works Department
Planning Division; Public Works Department
Subsequent environmental documentation must be prepared for development projects proposed to be
constructed on the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site. This information must be examined, at the time
the development project is proposed, in light of the Program EIR to determine whether a new Initial Study
would be required to be prepared leading to either an EIR or Negative Declaration. The subsequent
environmental documentation must include the following:
SepulvedalRosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX - -35
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El .Segundo February 2005
M.1-1 An analysis of sewer service to the proposed development must be prepared which
examines the capacity of existing sewer lines to serve the development, the projected
peak sewage generation and shall identify new sewer infrastructure required to serve the
development.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
M.1-1 An analysis of sewer service to the proposed development must be prepared which
examines the capacity of existing sewer lines to serve the development, the projected
peak sewage generation and must identify new sewer infrastructure required to serve the
development.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Pre - construction
Applicant
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
M.1 -2 The Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site must be annexed to Los Angeles County
Sanitation District No. 5
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
M.1-3 Project applicants must be required to obtain a sewer connection permit from the Los
Angeles County Sanitation Districts (District 5) to obtain sanitary sewer service.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
M.1 -4 Additional local sewer infrastructure must be provided by the applicant as necessary to
connect the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site with existing sewer infrastructure. This
provision must be coordinated with the project applicant and may be the partial
responsibility of the applicant, as determined by the City.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -36
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
M.1 -5 The applicant must be required to replace or upgrade the sewer infrastructure on or
adjacent to the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site, as needed.
Monitoring Phase: Pre- construction; Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
M.1 -6 Project applicants must comply with the City's Sewer Ordinance No. 1093, of the City of
El Segundo Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter I General Provisions, Policies, and
Procedures.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Pre - construction
Applicant
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
M.1-7 Prior to a building permit being issued the project applicant must submit the Final
Working Drawings to the City of El Segundo Planning and Building Safety Department
and the Public Works Department for review and approval.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Pre - construction
Applicant
Planning Division;
Works Department
Planning Division;
Works Department
Building Safety Division; Public
Building Safety Division; Public
M.1 -8 Closed circuit television (CCTV) inspection of existing on -site and adjacent off -site
sewer mains must be conducted to determine the present condition of the infrastructure
which the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning project will connect to.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Pre - construction
City of El Segundo
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
M.1-9 All future developments must be discharged to the existing twelve -inch sanitary sewer
main in Rosecrans Avenue.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX - -37
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Construction
Applicant
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
M.1 -10 New businesses that generate Fats, Oils, or Greases (e.g., restaurants and grocery stores)
must be required to install grease interceptors with a minimum 30 minute retention period
to ensure these contaminants do not block the sewerage system.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Plaza El Segundo Development
Construction
Applicant
Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
M.1 -11 The Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site must be annexed to Los Angeles County
Sanitation District No. 5
Monitoring Phase: Pre- construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
M.1 -12 The project applicant must be required to obtain a sewer connection permit from the Los
Angeles County Sanitation Districts (District 5) to obtain sanitary sewer service.
Monitoring Phase: Pre- construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
M.1 -13 Additional local sewer infrastructure must be provided by the applicant as necessary to
connect the Plaza El Segundo site with existing sewer infrastructure. This provision must
be coordinated with the project applicant and may be the partial responsibility of the
applicant, as determined by the City.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
SepulvedalRosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -38
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
M.1 -14 The existing 15 -inch sanitary sewer line must be removed and replaced with an 18 -inch
line. Plans must identify the point of connection for the proposed ten -inch sanitary sewer
to the existing sanitary si
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
:wer main on Allied Way.
Pre - construction; Construction
Applicant
Public Works Department; Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts
Public Works Department
M.1 -15 Project applicants must comply with the City's Sewer Ordinance No. 1093, of the City of
E1 Segundo Municipal Code, Title 12, Chapter I General Provisions, Policies, and
Procedures.
Monitoring Phase: Pre- construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
M.1 -16 Prior to a building permit being issued the project applicant must submit the Final
Working Drawings to the City of El Segundo Planning and Building Safety Department
and the Public Works Department for review and approval.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Pre - construction
Applicant
Planning Division;
Works Department
Planning Division;
Works Department
Building Safety Division; Public
Building Safety Division; Public
M.1 -17 Closed circuit television (CCTV) inspection of existing on -site and adjacent off -site
sewer mains must be connected to determine the present condition of the infrastructure
which the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning project will connect to.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction
Implementation Party:
City of El Segundo
Enforcement Agency:
Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency:
Public Works Department
M.1 -18 New businesses that generate Fats, Oils, or Greases (e.g., restaurants and grocery stores)
must be required to install grease interceptors with a minimum 30 minute retention period
to ensure these contaminants do not block the sewerage system.
Monitoring Phase: Construction
SepulvedalRosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -39
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency:
Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
Water
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
Subsequent environmental documentation must be prepared for development projects proposed to be
constructed on the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site. This information must be examined, at the time
the development project is proposed, in light of the Program EIR to determine whether a new Initial Study
would be required to be prepared leading to either an EIR or Negative Declaration. The subsequent
environmental documentation must include the following:
M.2 -1 An analysis of water service to the proposed development must be prepared which
examines the capacity of existing water lines to serve the development and projected
water demand and must identify new water infrastructure required to serve the
development.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
M.2 -1 An analysis of water service to the proposed development must be prepared which
examines the capacity of existing water lines to serve the development and the projected
water demand and must identify new water infrastructure required to serve the
development.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Pre - construction
Applicant
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
M.2 -2 New streets shall be connected through the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site to
adjacent existing streets, with no gaps or disconnects, so as to allow connections to
existing infrastructure contained in the existing streets.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Construction
Applicant
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -40
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
M.2 -3 Water distribution mains must be installed in the through streets in order to complete the
existing water grid and provide water distribution to the interior of the
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site. Connecting pipes must be a minimum of ten inches.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency:
Public Works Department
M.24 New water lines must be connected to the existing water line located in Allied Way to
provide a continuous public water line beginning from Sepulveda Boulevard to an
existing line in Allied Way.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Construction
Applicant
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
M.2 -5 Development on the proposed Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site must include dual
water connections to allow for landscaping to be irrigated by reclaimed water.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Construction
Applicant
Planning Division;
Works Department
Planning Division;
Works Department
Building Safety Division; Public
Building Safety Division; Public
M.2 -6 Reclaimed water must be used as the water source to irrigate landscaped areas on the
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site.
Monitoring Phase: Post - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Planning Division
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
M.2 -7 Efficient irrigation systems must be installed which minimize runoff and evaporation and
maximize the water which will reach plant roots (e.g. drip irrigation, automatic sprinklers
equipped with moisture sensors).
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction; Post - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Recreation and Parks Department
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division; Building Safety Division
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -41
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
M.2 -8 Automatic sprinkler systems must be set to irrigate landscaping during early morning
hours or during the evening to reduce water losses from evaporation. Sprinklers must
also be reset to water less often in cooler months and during the rainfall season so that
water is not wasted by excessive landscape irrigation.
Monitoring Phase: Post- construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning Division
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division
M.2 -9 Selection of drought- tolerant, low water consuming plant varieties must be used to reduce
irrigation water consumption.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Recreation and Parks Department
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division; Recreation and Parks Department
M.2 -10 Project applicants must comply with the City's Conservation Program, Ordinance No.
1194, of the City of El Segundo Municipal Code, Title 10 -Parks and Recreation, Chapter
2 Water Conservation in Landscaping and Resolution No. 3806.
• Prior to a building permit being issued the project applicant must submit the Final
Working Drawings to the City of El Segundo Planning and Building Safety
Department for review and approval relative to compliance with the City's Water
Conservation Ordinance and Guidelines for Water Conservation in Landscaping.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Plaza EI Segundo Development
Pre - construction
Applicant
Recreation and Parks Department
Recreation and Parks Department
M.2 -11 Water distribution mains must be installed in the eastward extension of Park Place and
the extension of Allied Way to Park Place in order to complete the existing water grid
and provide water distribution to the interior of the Plaza El Segundo site. Connecting
pipes should be a minimum of ten inches.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Public Works Department
Monitoring Agency:
Public Works Department
.Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -42
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
M.2 -12 Development on the proposed Plaza El Segundo Site must include dual water connections
to allow for landscaping to be irrigated by reclaimed water.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Construction
Applicant
Planning Division;
Works Department
Planning Division;
Works Department
Building Safety Division; Public
Building Safety Division; Public
M.2 -13 Reclaimed water must be used as the water source to irrigate landscaped areas on the
Plaza El Segundo Development.
Monitoring Phase: Post - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Public Works Department; Planning Division
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department
M.2 -14 Efficient irrigation systems must be installed which minimize runoff and evaporation and
maximize the water which will reach plant roots (e.g. drip irrigation, automatic sprinklers
equipped with moisture sensors).
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction; Post - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Recreation and Parks Department
Monitoring Agency: Public Works Department; Building Safety Division
M.2 -15 Automatic sprinkler systems must be set to irrigate landscaping during early morning
hours or during the evening to reduce water losses from evaporation. Sprinklers must
also be reset to water less often in cooler months and during the rainfall season so that
water is not wasted by excessive landscape irrigation.
Monitoring Phase: Post - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning Division
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division
M.2 -16 Selection of drought- tolerant, low water consuming plant varieties must be used to reduce
irrigation water consumption.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre- construction; Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Recreation and Parks Department
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division; Recreation and Parks Department
Sepulveda'Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -43
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
M.2 -17 The project applicant must comply with the City's Conservation Program, Ordinance No.
1194, of the City of El Segundo Municipal Code, Title 10 -Parks and Recreation, Chapter
2 Water Conservation in Landscaping and Resolution No. 3806.
• Prior to a building permit being issued the project applicant must submit the Final
Working Drawings to the City of El Segundo Planning and Building Safety
Department for review and approval relative to compliance with the City's Water
Conservation Ordinance and Guidelines for Water Conservation in Landscaping.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Recreation and Parks Department
Monitoring Agency: Recreation and Parks Department
Solid Waste
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
No subsequent environmental documentation is required.
Mitigation Measures
SepulvedalRosecrans Site Rezoning
M.3 -1 Where economically feasible, the proposed Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning project
must incorporate the use of recycled materials in building materials, furnishing operations
and building maintenance.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction; Post - construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Planning Division
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
M.3 -2 The proposed Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning project must recycle all construction
debris in a practical, available, and accessible manner, to the maximum extent feasible,
during the demolition and construction phases.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Construction
Applicant
Building Safety Division
Building Safety Division
M.3 -3 The design of the proposed Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning project must allocate
space for a recycling collection area for use by both on -site employees and visitors, the
SepulvedalRosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -44
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
design of which will adhere to siting requirements in the City's recycling ordinance. The
design of the collection area will facilitate source separation and collection of additional
materials that may be designated as recyclable by the City in the future.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning Division
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division
Plaza El Segundo Development
M.34 Where economically feasible, the proposed Plaza El Segundo Development must
incorporate the use of recycled materials in building materials, furnishing operations and
building maintenance.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction, Post - construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Planning Division
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
M.3 -5 The proposed Plaza El Segundo Development must recycle all construction debris in a
practical, available, and accessible manner, to the maximum extent feasible, during the
demolition and construction phases.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Planning Division
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
M.3 -6 The design of the proposed Plaza El Segundo Development must allocate space for a
recycling collection area for use by both on -site employees and visitors, the design of
which will adhere to siting requirements in the City's recycling ordinance. The design of
the collection area will facilitate source separation and collection of additional materials
that may be designated as recyclable by the City in the future.
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning Division
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division
Natural Gas
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -45
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
No subsequent environmental documentation is required.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
No mitigation measures are required.
Plaza El Segundo Development
No mitigation measures are required.
Electricity
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
No subsequent environmental documentation is required.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
M.5 -1 The applicant must consult with SCE during the design process of the proposed
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning project regarding potential energy conservation
measures for the project. Examples of such energy conservation measures include:
• Design windows (i.e., tinting, double pane glass, etc.) to reduce thermal gain and loss
and thus cooling loads during warm weather, and heating loads during cool weather.
• Install thermal insulation in walls and ceilings that exceed requirements established
by the State of California Energy Conservation Standards.
• Install high - efficiency lamps for all internal streetlights and outdoor security lighting.
• Time control interior and exterior lighting. These systems must be programmed to
account for variations in seasonal daylight times.
• Finish exterior walls with light- colored materials and high - emissivity characteristics
to reduce cooling loads. Finish interior walls with light - colored materials to reflect
more light and thus increase lighting efficiency.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -46
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Phase: Pre - construction; Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning Division; Building Safety Division; Southern
California Edison (SCE)
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division; Building Safety Division
M.5 -2 All on -site electrical lines must be placed underground, except for high voltage
transmission lines located along Rosecrans Avenue.
Monitoring Phase: Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department;
SCE
Monitoring Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
M.5 -3 Electrical transformers must be screened from view from the public right -of -way.
Monitoring Phase: Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning Division
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division
Plaza El.Segundo Development
M.54 The applicant must consult with SCE during the design process of the proposed Plaza El
Segundo Development regarding potential energy conservation measures for the project.
Examples of such energy conservation measures include:
• Design windows (e.g., tinting, double pane glass, etc.) to reduce thermal gain and
loss and thus cooling loads during warm weather, and heating loads during cool
weather.
• Install thermal insulation in walls and ceilings that exceed requirements established
by the State of California Energy Conservation Standards.
• Install high - efficiency lamps for all internal streetlights and outdoor security lighting.
• Time control interior and exterior lighting. These systems must be programmed to
account for variations in seasonal daylight times.
• Finish exterior walls with light- colored materials and high emissivity characteristics
to reduce cooling loads. Finish interior walls with light- colored materials to reflect
more light and thus increase lighting efficiency.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -47
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Phase: Pre- construction; Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Planning Division; Building Safety Division; SCE
Monitoring Agency: Planning Division; Building Safety Division
M.5 -5 All on -site electrical lines must be placed underground, except for high voltage
transmission lines located along Rosecrans Avenue.
Monitoring Phase: Construction
Implementation Party: Applicant
Enforcement Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department;
SCE
Monitoring Agency: Building Safety Division; Public Works Department
M.5 -6 Electrical transformers must be screened from view from the public right -of -way.
Monitoring Phase:
Construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Planning Division
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
XIII. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Subsequent Environmental Documentation
Subsequent environmental documentation shall be prepared for development projects proposed to be
constructed on the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site. The subsequent environmental documentation
shall include the following:
N -1 A records search and /or Phase I Archaeological Survey must be conducted by a qualified
archaeologist prior to the start of construction activities (including grading) for any
development on the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site. If the survey identifies
resources within the construction area, follow on studies shall be conducted in
accordance with the recommendations of the records search prior to commencement of
construction.
N -2 Further analysis of Cultural Resource 19-186856 is required, that meets the requirements
of CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)(2), to determine potential eligibility for the
California or National Register of Historic Places prior to any construction activities
occurring on the H. Kramer portion of the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site. If further
analysis identifies that the resource is eligible, then the recommendations identified in
that analysis shall be followed.
Mitigation Measures
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX - -48
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning
N -1 A records search and /or Phase I Archaeological Survey must be conducted by a qualified
archaeologist prior to the start of construction activities (including grading) for any
development on the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site. If the survey identifies
resources within the construction area, follow on studies must be conducted in
accordance with the recommendations of the records search prior to commencement of
construction.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Planning Division
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
N -2 Further analysis of Cultural Resource 19- 186856, that meets the requirements of CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)(2), is required to determine potential eligibility for the
California or National Register of Historic Places prior to any construction activities
occurring on the H. Kramer portion of the Sepulveda/Rosecrans Rezoning Site. If further
analysis identifies that the resource is eligible, then the recommendations identified in
that analysis must be followed and measures identified to reduce impacts to less than
significant levels.
Monitoring Phase:
Pre - construction
Implementation Party:
Applicant
Enforcement Agency:
Planning Division
Monitoring Agency:
Planning Division
N -3 In the event that archaeological or paleontological resources are encountered during the
course of grading or construction, all development must temporarily cease in these areas
until the resources are properly assessed and subsequent recommendations are
determined by a qualified archaeologist/paleontologist.
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Plaza El Segundo Development
Construction
Applicant
Planning Division; Building Safety Division
Planning Division; Building Safety Division
N -4 In the event that archaeological or paleontological resources are encountered during the
course of grading or construction, all development must temporarily cease in these areas
until the resources are properly assessed and subsequent recommendations are
determined by a qualified archaeologist/paleontologist.
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX - -49
Final Environmental Impact Report
City of El Segundo February 2005
Monitoring Phase:
Implementation Party:
Enforcement Agency:
Monitoring Agency:
Construction
Applicant
Planning Division; Building Safety Division
Planning Division; Building Safety Division
P \Planning & Building Safety \PROIECI'S \626 - 650 \1:A - 631 \Council Agenda Packct \Final Approved DocumentsTA- 63 I.reso.cc
Exhibit B MMRP.RTGA.doc
Sepulveda/Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza IX. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
El Segundo Development Page IX -50
Final Environmental Impact Report
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542 Exhibit "C"
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 1417 Exhibit "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The following conditions shall be binding upon Rosecrans - Sepulveda Partners 2, LLC,
and PES Partners, LLC, the property owner(s) and their successors in interest,
including without limitation occupants of the property The following conditions for the
City of El Segundo's approval of Environmental Assessment No. 768, Zone Text
Amendment No. 08 -01, Development Agreement No. 07 -03 ( "Project Conditions ") shall
be fully complied with as set forth below.
All mitigation measures in the Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2003121037)
for Environmental Assessment No. 631, Development Agreement No. 03 -1, General
Plan Amendment No. 03 -4 & 03 -5, Zone Change No. 03 -2 & 03 -3, Zone Text
Amendment No. 04 -1, and Subdivision No. 03 -7, which are reflected in the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program for the proposed Sepulveda /Rosecrans Site
Rezoning Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative and Plaza El Segundo
Development Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative are incorporated by this
reference into these conditions of approval.
2. All conditions of approval in Environmental Assessment No. 631, Development
Agreement No. 03 -1, General Plan Amendment No. 03-4 & 03 -5, Zone Change No.
03 -2 & 03 -3, Zone Text Amendment No. 04 -1, and Subdivision No. 03 -7, except as
modified below.
3. Condition No. 2 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to read
as follows:
DEFINITIONS
Unless the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the following
definitions will govern the construction of the words and phrases used in these
conditions.
A. "P.B.S. Director" means the City of El Segundo Director of Planning and Building
Safety, or designee.
B. "EIR" means the Final Environmental Impact Report for the proposed
Sepulveda /Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza El Segundo development project
(SCH No. 2003121037), El Segundo, California.
C. "ESMC" means the El Segundo Municipal Code.
C- 1.Development Agreement refers to Development Agreement No. 03 -1 and any
amendments thereto.
2/19/08
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542 Exhibit "C"
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 1417 Exhibit "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
D. "Project Area" refers to each of the 20 developable lots on the Plaza El Segundo
development Project Site as shown on Vesting Tentative Map No. 061630 and
the 3.41 acres comprised of Parcel 1 of Lot Line Adjustment No. 07 -06 (formerly
Parcel 2 and that portion of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 17911, in the City of El
Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, As Per Map Filed in Book
269, Pages 82 through 84, of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder
of Said County, lying Westerly of a line parallel with and 120.00 feet easterly of
the westerly line of said Parcel 3, said line shown as "S 00 Degrees 02'26" W
418.50 Degrees on Said Parcel Map) .
E. "Project Site" refers to the 43.3 -acre site generally located south of Hughes Way,
east of Sepulveda Boulevard, west of Douglas Street, and north of Rosecrans
Avenue.
E -1. "Project Site Phase 1B" refers to the 8.13 -acre site comprised of the
approximately 4.72 -acre portion of Vesting Tentative Map No. 061630 south of
the Union Pacific Railroad and the 3.41 acres comprised of Parcel 1 of Lot Line
Adjustment No. 07 -06 (formerly Parcel 2 and that portion of Parcel 3 of Parcel
Map No. 17911, in the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of
California, As Per Map Filed in Book 269, Pages 82 through 84, of Parcel Maps,
in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County, lying Westerly of a line
parallel with and 120.00 feet easterly of the westerly line of said Parcel 3, said
line shown as "S 00 Degrees 02'26" W 418.50 Degrees on Said Parcel Map),
generally located south of the Union Pacific Railroad, east of Sepulveda
Boulevard, west of Douglas Street, and north of Rosecrans Avenue.
E -2. "Phase 1A" refers to the portion of the Project Area located north of the Union
Pacific Railroad right -of -way.
E -3. "Phase 1 B" refers to the portion of the Project Area located south of the Union
Pacific Railroad right -of -way.
F. "Sepulveda /Rosecrans Rezoning Site" refers to the approximately 110 acres
generally located south of Hughes Way, east of Sepulveda Boulevard, west of
Douglas Street, and north of Rosecrans Avenue which is the subject of a General
Plan and Zoning Code Amendment that is being considered concurrently with the
land use entitlements for the Project Area and the Project Site.
G. Except as otherwise specified in these Conditions of Approval, conditions must
be satisfied before the issuance of a Building Permit for each building within the
Project Area.
2/19/08 2
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542 Exhibit "C"
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 1417 Exhibit "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
AESTHETICS
Materials and Design
4. Condition No. 5F of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:
"All buildings must be in accordance with the Project Area's Conditions, Covenants
and Restrictions (CC &R's)."
5. Condition No. 5L of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:
"A six -foot high solid wall must be constructed along the southern property line of Lot
15 of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 061630 for at least a length of 200 feet from
the eastern edge of the Sepulveda Boulevard right -of -way and along the northern
property line of Lot 19 of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 061630 for at least a
length of 200 feet from the eastern edge of the Sepulveda Boulevard right -of -way. A
six -foot high wall or a fence constructed of vinyl chain link or other material must be
constructed along the remaining property lines of the Project Area abutting the Union
Pacific Railroad right -of -way with screening of the right -of -way with the use of
landscaping, including, without limitation, vines, hedges and /or trees to the
satisfaction of the P.B.S. Director. A combination of a fence constructed of 6 -foot
high wrought iron or steel tubing and a six -foot high solid wall compatible with the
fence and wall materials on the portion of the site north of the Union Pacific Railroad
right -of -way must be constructed along the northern property line of Project Site
Phase 113 for those portions east of the eastern edge of the Sepulveda Boulevard
right -of -way with screening of the right -of -way with the use of landscaping, that
includes without limitation, vines, hedges and /or trees to the satisfaction of the
P.B.S. Director excepting those areas closest to Sepulveda Boulevard prohibited by
Union Pacific Railroad for visibility and safety reasons."
6. Condition No. 5S of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:
"The Project Area site plan must be revised to provide sidewalks or other designated
pathways following direct and safe routes from the Park Place right -of -way to
buildings H through A -7, from the Park Place right -of -way to Pad D, and from the
Sepulveda Boulevard right -of -way to Building No. 2, and any other building that may
be developed that is setback more than 200 feet from a public right -of -way, subject
to the review and approval of the P.B.S. Director. The Project Area site plan must
provide sidewalks or other designated pathways following direct and safe routes
from the Sepulveda Boulevard public right -of -way and the Rosecrans Avenue public
right -of -way to the entrances of the buildings and the plaza in front of the buildings,
subject to the review and approval of the P.B.S. Director."
2/19/08 3
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542 Exhibit "C"
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 1417 Exhibit "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Landscaping and Irrigation
7. Condition No. 7 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to read
as follows:
Before the issuance of the first Building Permit in the Project Area, the applicant
must provide a Landscape Plan and Architectural Plan (i.e. construction drawings),
consistent with the Master Landscaping Plan, to the P.B.S. Director, Director of
Recreation and Parks, and the Police Chief for review and approval. The
Landscape Plan and Architectural Plan must demonstrate that errant nighttime
illumination is generally screened from other potentially sensitive uses, through
building design and landscape treatments. Before the issuance of the first Building
Permit in the Project Site Phase 1 B, the applicant must provide a Landscape and
Irrigation Plan and an Architectural Site Plan (i.e. construction drawings), consistent
with the Master Landscaping Plan, to the P.B.S. Director, Director of Recreation and
Parks, and the Police Chief for review and approval that includes the use of trees,
hedges, and or vines along the eastern boundary from Rosecrans Avenue to the
Union Pacific Railroad. The plant material must be placed west and in front of the
property line wall or fence. The Landscape Plan must utilize decorative pavement
material in the plaza and for the pedestrian entrances to the plaza. The Landscape
Plan and Architectural Plan must demonstrate that errant nighttime illumination is
generally screened from other potentially sensitive uses, through building design and
landscape treatments.
Signs
8. Condition No. 9 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirely to read
as follows:
"Before the issuance of the first Building Permit in the Project Area, the applicant
must submit to the P.B.S. Director for review and approval an overall Master Sign
Program for the Project Area. Before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for
each building within the Project Area, the applicant must submit construction sign
plans substantially consistent with the approved Master Sign Program for the review
and approval of the P.B.S. Director. Before the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy, signs must be installed in accordance with the approved Master Sign
Program. The overall Master Sign Program must include, without limitation:
A. Compliance with the ESMC;
B. Notwithstanding any other provisions in the ESMC, a maximum of three ground
or monument signs with a maximum height of 35 feet each are permitted along
the Sepulveda Boulevard street frontage of the Project Area north of the Union
Pacific Railroad;
2/19/08 4
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542 Exhibit "C"
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 1417 Exhibit "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
B -1. Notwithstanding any other provisions in the ESMC, a maximum of two ground
or monument signs with a maximum height of 20 feet each are permitted along
the Sepulveda Boulevard street frontage of the Project Area south of the Union
Pacific Railroad;
C. Notwithstanding any other provisions in the ESMC, a maximum of two ground or
monument signs with a maximum height of 25 feet are permitted along the Park
Place street frontages of the Project Area;
D. Notwithstanding any other provisions in the ESMC, a maximum of two ground or
monument signs with a maximum height of 25 feet are permitted along the Allied
Way street frontages of the Project Area;
D -1. Notwithstanding any other provisions in the ESMC, a maximum of two ground or
monument signs with a maximum height of 20 feet each are permitted along the
Rosecrans Avenue street frontage of the Project Area;
D -2.A maximum of two light emitting diode signs ( "LED Sign "), not to exceed 30' in
height and 60' in width each, may be located within the interior portion of Phase
1 B. The displays are intended for viewing by the customers of Phase 1 B and
Developer shall use reasonable efforts to minimize exposure of the displays to
Rosecrans Avenue and Sepulveda Boulevard. In addition, in no event shall the
top of any display exceed 15' above a plane that is parallel with the 157.00 foot
elevation of the northeast corner of Rosecrans Avenue and Sepulveda
Boulevard. Each sign shall be utilized for the purpose of providing on site
advertising for tenants of the Project and for the products that are offered for sale
by those tenants (but only in conjunction with the display of the name of the
tenant that sells the product), and may also be utilized for movie projections and
abstract video and artistic images that are not related to advertising any
particular product, or entertainment, retail or service use. Each sign shall be
attached to a building or other structure and integrated into the architectural
design of the building and shall not be free standing;
E. Notwithstanding any other provisions in the ESMC, no freestanding or pole signs,
except as set forth in this Condition No. 9 and as except as described in
Condition No. 10 below, are permitted along the Rosecrans Avenue frontage of
the Project Area;
F. All signs must be architecturally compatible with the proposed buildings;
G. All signs must be compatible with the aesthetic objectives of the General Plan;
and,
H. No sign must impede traffic or pedestrian safety.
2/19/08
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542 Exhibit "C"
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 1417 Exhibit "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
I. Height limitation of signs referred to in this Condition No. 9 shall be measured
from the average adjacent street elevation."
9. Condition No. 10 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:
"Before the issuance of a Final Certificate of Occupancy for the first building in the
Project Area, the applicant must construct and maintain a monument sign at the
northeast corner of Sepulveda Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue announcing the
entrance to the City. The sign is subject to review and approval by the City Council.
The sign should be compatible with the design of the Master Sign Program for the
Plaza El Segundo development project."
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Plans
10. Condition No. 29 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:
"The Plaza El Segundo development project is allowed to develop up to a maximum
of 448,829 square feet including a maximum of 70,000 square feet for the Plaza El
Segundo Phase 1B development project., consisting of a combination of uses as
permitted by the Plaza El Segundo Reduced Traffic Generation Alternative
described in the Final EIR, the C -4 Zone and as limited by the Development
Agreement as long as the total AM, PM peak, daily, and Saturday midday peak trip
generation established in the EIR for the Plaza El Segundo development-project as
a whole is not exceeded."
11. Condition No. 30 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:
"The maximum project size may be reduced as determined by the vehicle trip
generation for each use. The Sepulveda /Rosecrans Site Rezoning and Plaza El
Segundo development project permit the following vehicle trips:
MAXIMUM PERMITTED
AM
PM
Dail y
Saturday
TRIPS
Midday
Sepulveda /Rosecrans Site
1,033
2,346
25,859
3,379
Rezoning
Plaza El Segundo
779
1,477
16,645
2,205
Development Project
2/19/08 6
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542 Exhibit "C"
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 1417 Exhibit "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The trip generation for each use and building must be determined using the rates
identified below, adjusted for internal capture and pass by discount rate consistent
with the traffic study for EA No. 631:
Shopping Center (per 1,000 sf ) — LU 820
Daily: Ln(T) = 0.65 Ln(A) + 5.83
AM Peak Hour Ln(T) = 0.60 Ln(A) + 2.29; I/13=61
O/B =39%
PM Peak Hour Ln(T) = 0.66 Ln(A) + 3.40; I/13=48 %,
O/B =52%
Saturday Ln(T) = 0.65 Ln(A) + 3.77; I/13=52 %, O/B =48%
Grocery Store (per 1,000 sf) — LU 850
Daily T = 66.95(A) + 1391.56
AM Peak Hour Ln(T) = 1.70 Ln(A) — 1.42; I/13=61 %,
O/B =39%
PM Peak Hour Ln(T) = 0.79 Ln(A) + 3.20; I/13=51 %,
O/B =49%
Saturday Ln(T) = 0.74 Ln(A) + 3.47; I/B =51 !, 0/13=49%
Free Standing Discount Store (per 1,000 sf) — LU 815
Daily: T = 56.02(A)
AM Peak Hour T = 0.84 (A); I/13=68 %, 0/13=32%
PM Peak Hour T = 5.06 A); I/13=50 %, 0/13=50%
Saturday T = 7.58 (A); I/13=51 %, 0/13=49%
Electronics Superstore (per 1,000 sf) — LU 863
Daily T = 45.04 (A)
AM Peak Hour T = 0.28 (A); I/13=53 %, 0/13=47%
PM Peak Hour T = 4.50 (A); I/13=49 %, 0/13=51 %
Saturday [N/A]*
Health Club (per 1,000 sf) — LU 493
Daily T = 43.0 (A)
AM Peak Hour* T = 3.06 (A); I/13=58 %, 0/13=42%
PM Peak Hour T = 5.76 (A); I/13=63 %, 0/13=37%
Saturday [N /A]*
Fast -food Restaurant with Drive - Through Window (per
1,000 sf) — LU 934
Daily T = 496.12 (A)
AM Peak Hour T = 53.11 (A); I/13=51 %, 0/13=49%
PM Peak Hour T = 34.64 (A); I/13=52 %, 0/13=48%
Saturday T = 59.20 (A); I/13=51 %, 0/13=49%
High- Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant (per 1,000 sf) —
LU 932
Daily T = 127.15 (A)
AM Peak Hour T = 11.52 (A); I/13=52 %, 0/13=48%
2/19/08 7
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542 Exhibit "C"
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 1417 Exhibit "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PM Peak Hour T = 10.92 (A); I/B =61 %, 0/8=39%
Saturday T = 20.00 (A); I/B =63 %, O/B =37%
Quality Restaurant (per 1,000 sf) — LU 931
Daily T = 89.95 (A)
AM Peak Hour T = 0.81 (A); I/B = 82 %, O/B = 18%
PM Peak Hour T = 7.49 (A); I/B = 67 %, O/B = 33%
T = trip ends A = building area in 1,000's of square feet
I/B = inbound percentages LU = ITE land use code
O/B = outbound percentages
Sources:
Trip Generation, 7th Edition, Institute of Transportation
Engineers, 2003.
* Saturday information unavailable — PM Peak hour
utilized.
12. Condition No. 33 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:
"Before the issuance of a Building Permit for the Project Area, the applicant must
submit plans and specifications for any new curbs, sidewalks, driveway approaches,
wheelchair ramps, and asphalt concrete (A.C.) pavement, that must be
constructed /reconstructed in the public right -of -way for any missing public
segments /areas on the perimeter of the Project Area, as reasonably required by the
Director of Public Works. Any existing driveways and other paved areas on the
perimeter of the Project Site that will not be incorporated into the development must
be removed and replaced with standard curb and sidewalk. Before issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the building that is the subject of the Building Permit,
the applicant must install the required public improvements per the approved plans
to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Public Works."
13. Condition No. 33A of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is added to read as follows:
"The applicant must submit either a Lot Line Adjustment or Lot Merger application
after the recording of Final Map 061530, to realign the two parcels south of Union
Pacific Railroad to match the proposed locations of the buildings to maintain
conformity with the development standards in the ESMC."
DEDICATIONS AND FEES
14. Condition No. 35 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:
"The applicant must dedicate approximately 0.50 -acres of the "Project Area" to the
city for roadway widening along the east side of Sepulveda Boulevard, as required in
Development Agreement No. 03 -1 and as depicted on Vesting Tentative Map
2/19/08 8
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542 Exhibit "C"
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 1417 Exhibit "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
061630. An easement may be provided in lieu of a dedication, only if Caltrans will
not accept the dedication and will only accept an easement. A dedication may be
provided for the Phase 1A portion of Sepulveda Boulevard and an easement may be
provided for the Phase 1 B portion of Sepulveda Boulevard or conversely an
easement may be provided for the Phase 1A portion of Sepulveda Boulevard and a
dedication may be provided for the Phase 1 B portion of Sepulveda Boulevard. Such
dedication and /or such easement shall occur through and upon recordation of the
Final Map."
TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION /PARKING
15. Condition No. 54 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:
"If the Los Angeles Congestion Management Plan (CMP) requires the City to track
the debits /credits associated with development in the City, before the issuance of the
first Building Permit for the Project Site, the applicant must provide Los Angeles
County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Debit/Credit Calculations, and a
Phasing Plan for CMP related improvements, to the P.B.S. Director and Public
Works for review and approval. The calculations must include only programs which
meet all the minimum criteria (e.g., density) contained in the CMP. Before the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building, the applicant must provide
evidence to the P.B.S. Director that the proposed project CMP debits /credits related
improvements were implemented and balanced in the Project Area in accordance
with the approved phasing plan. Compliance with this measure must be verified by
the P.B.S. Director before permit issuance. As may be applicable, the City will give
credit for CMP related improvements towards the applicant's traffic mitigation impact
fee, as appropriate."
16. Condition No. 57 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended it its entirety to
read as follows:
"The applicant must install 'No Parking' and other traffic signs on the Park Place and
Allied Way roadway extensions, as required by the Public Works Department. The
applicant must install "No Parking" and other traffic signs on Sepulveda Boulevard
and Rosecrans Avenue, as required by the Public Works Department."
17. Condition No. 61 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:
"Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building in the Project
Area, the new roadways, including any medians, sidewalks, curbs, and gutters must
be constructed in accordance with applicable Department of Public Works
construction standards for a public roadway with the minimum dimensions required
by the Circulation Element of the El Segundo General Plan, and must comply with
2/19/08 9
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542 Exhibit "C"
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 1417 Exhibit "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
applicable requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), as well as City
requirements for traffic signage, street lighting, drainage plans, and underground
utility service, subject to the review and approval of the Director of Public Works.
The applicant must be responsible for the design and construction of the new
roadways."
UTILITIES
18. Condition No. 78 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:
"Before issuance of the first building permit in the Project Area, the applicant must
inspect the existing sewer laterals that connect to the City sewer mains in the area
with closed circuit television (CCTV) to determine the condition of the existing
infrastructure that will serve the project. All reports and copies of CCTV videos must
be submitted to the Public Works Department."
19. Condition No. 82 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to
read as follows
"Before issuance of a first Certificate of Occupancy for any building in the Project
Area north of the Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way, the applicant must replace the
15 -inch sewer line located to the north of the project site with an 18 -inch sewer line
as depicted on the Phase 1 Utility Layout plan. Before issuance of a first Certificate
of Occupancy for any building in the Project Area south of the Union Pacific Railroad
right -of -way, the applicant must prepare an analysis of the existing sanitary system
on Rosecrans Avenue and calculate additional flow resulting from the proposed
development into the existing system. If necessary, upgrade the 12" and 15"
diameter downstream sanitary sewer pipes on Rosecrans Avenue from point of
connection to Aviation Boulevard."
WATER
20. Condition No. 94 of Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 1382 is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:
"The applicant must install a loop water distribution system for the Project Area with
service connections to each of the water mains in the streets surrounding the
project, subject to the review and approval of the Director of Public Works. Before
the issuance of each Building Permit in the Project Area, the applicant must submit a
construction phasing plan for the water service, which must include, without
limitation, how the building which is the subject of the permit will be connected to the
looped water distribution system. The looped water system must provide water
mains connection to Rosecrans Avenue on the south and Sepulveda Boulevard to
the west."
2/19/08 10
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542 Exhibit "C"
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 1417 Exhibit "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
21. Condition No. 100 is added to read as follows:
"At least two water meters must be provided by the applicant per City Standard and
approved by the City of El Segundo Water Division prior to installation."
INDEMNIFICATION
22. The Developer must defend, indemnify and hold the City and its elected and
appointed officials, officers, employees and agents harmless from and against any
claims, legal or equitable actions, damages, costs (including, without limitation,
attorney's fees), injuries, or liability of whatsoever kind or nature, arising from the
City's approval of the project, including but not limited to the CEQA determination
and /or the Development Agreement approval.
23. Rosecrans Sepulveda Partners 2, LLC and PES Partners, LLC must acknowledge
receipt and acceptance of the Project Conditions by executing the acknowledgement
below.
By signing this document, Rosecrans Sepulveda Partners 2, LLC, and PES Partners,
LLC, certify that they have read, understood, and agrees to the Project Conditions listed
in this document and represents and warrants that it has the authority to execute this
document on behalf of the property owner and acknowledges that the conditions set
forth above shall run with the land and be binding upon all owners and occupants of the
land.
Rosecrans Sepulveda Partners 2, LLC
M
Dan Crosser
Its: Vice - President
Eric Winquist
Its: Vice - President
2/19/08
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 4542 Exhibit "C"
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE No. 1417 Exhibit "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PES Partners, LLC
By:
Dan Crosser
Its: Vice - President
Eric Winquist
Its: Vice - President
{If Corporation or similar entity, needs two officer signatures or evidence that one
signature binds the company}
PAPlanning & Building Safety \PROJECTS \751 - 775 \EA - 768 \CC Docs\2008.03.04 \EA- 768.CC Conditions of Approval.doc
2/19/08 12