CC RESOLUTION 4432RESOLUTION NO. X432
A RESOLUTION FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH
THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND
ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURSUANT
TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 65089.
The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows
SECTION 1 The City Council finds that
A The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority ( "MTA "), acting as the
Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the 1999
Congestion Management program in December 1999;
B As adopted, the CMP requires that MTA annually determine that Los Angeles
County and cities within the County conform with all CMP requirements,
C Among other things, the CMP requires municipalities within Los Angeles County
to submit Local Development Reports to the MTA by September 1 each year;
D The City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 2, 2005,
E Based upon the August 2, 2005 public hearing, the City Council determined that
By June 15 of odd - numbered years the City conducts annual traffic counts
and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections
consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and
Roadway System Chapter,
The City adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand
management ordinance consistent with the minimum requirements
identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management Chapter,
The City adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program
consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land
Use Analysis Program Chapter, and
The City has adopted a Local Development Report, attached hereto and
made a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the Draft
2005 CMP This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growth
within the City with transportation improvements, and demonstrates that
the City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency
Plan consistent with the MTA Board adopted 2003 Short Range
Transportation Plan
SECTION 2 In accordance with its findings, the City Council detennmes that the City of El
Segundo is in compliance with all requirements of the 1999 CMP, as amended
SECTION 3 This Resolution will remain effective until superseded by a subsequent resolution
SECTION 4 This Resolution will take effect immediately upon adoption
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of August, 1005
f
Kelly McDoOa, Mayor
City of El Segundo
APPROVED
Mark D Hen
H Berger, AssXtar# City Attorney
ATTEST
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 1
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the
whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution
No 4432 was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor
of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 2nd day of August 2005, and the same was so passed and adopted by the
following vote
AYES McDowell, Gaines, Boulgarides, Busch, Jacobson
NOES None
ABSENT None
ABSTAIN None
IA 1"� 6 U/YIM d"
Cindy Mort en, City Clerk
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Date Prepared. July 26, 2005
2005 CMP Local Development Report
Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2004 - MAY 31, 2005
Contact: Kimberly Christensen, Planning Manager
Phone Number. (310) 524 -2340
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY
*
IMPORTANT, All "#value'" cells on this page are automatically calculated.
Please do not enter data in these cells.
DEVELOPMENT TOTALS
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Dwelling Units
Single Family Residential 7.00
Multi- Family Residential 3400
Group Quarters 000
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Commercial (less than 300,000 sq ft)
Commercial (300,000 sq ft or more)
Freestanding Eating & Drinking
NON - RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Lodging
Industrial
Office (less than 50,000 sq ft )
Office (50,000- 299,999 sq ft )
Office (300,000 sq ft or more)
Medical
Government
Institutional /Educational
University (# of students)
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT TOTALS
Exempted Dwelling Units
Exempted Non - residential sq ft (in 1,00
1,000 Net Sq.Ft.Z
4.06
0.00
000
1.000 Net So.Ft.Z
0.00
27.05
7.28
000
0.00
0.00
000
0.00
000
Daily Trips
0.00
000
0
1 Note Please change dates on this form for later years Section I, Page 1
2 Net square feet is the difference between new development and adjustments entered on pages 2 and 3
014
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Date Prepared: July 26, 2005
2005 CMP Local Development Report
Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2004 - MAY 31, 2005
Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter " If there are no data for that category, enter "0 "
PART O.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category
Dwelling
Units
Single Family Residential
21.00
Multi-Family Residential
47.00
Group Quarters
0.00
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category
1,000 Gross
Square Feet
Commercial less than 300,000 sq ft
0.00
Commercial 300,000 sq ft or more)
000
Freestanding Eating & Drinking
000
NON - RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category
1,000 Gross
Square Feet
Lodging
0.00
Industrial
8729
Office less than 50,000 sq ft
728
Office 50,000 - 299,999 sq ft
0.00
Office 300,000 sq ft or more)
000
Medical
0.00
Government
0.00
Institutional /Educational
0.00
University # of students)
000
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
Daily Trips
(Enter "0" if none
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
000
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
0.00
Section 1, Page 2
015
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Date Prepared: July 26, 2005
2005 CMP Local Development Report
Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2004 - MAY 31, 2005
Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0 "
PART2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
IMPORTANT Adjustments maybe claimed only for 1) development permits that were both
issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any
structure with the reporting eriod
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
Dwelling
Units
Single Family Residential
14.00
Multi-Family Residential
13.00
Group Quarters
0.00
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category
1,000 Gross
Square Feet
Commercial less than 300,000 sq ft
4.06
Commercial 300,000 sq ft or more
000
Freestanding Eating & Drinking
000
NON - RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category
1,000 Gross
Square Feet
Lodging
0.00
Industrial
114.34
Office less than 50,000 sq ft)
0.00
Office 50,000 - 299,999 sq ft
0.00
Office 300,000 sq ft or more)
0.00
Medical
0.00
Government
0.00
Institutional /Educational
0.00
University # of students
000
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description
(Attach additional sheets if necessa )
Daily Trips
(Enter "0" if none
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
0.00
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
0.00
016
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
Date Prepared: July 26, 2005
2005 CMP Local Development Report
Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2005 - MAY 31, 2005
Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter " If there are no data for that category, enter "0 "
'•' D DEVELOPMENT
(NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS)
LowNery Low Income Housing
I�J
Dwelling Units
High Density Residential
0
Dwelling Units
Near Rail Stations
Mixed Use Developments
0
1,000 Gross Square Feet
Near Rail Stations
1 01
Dwelling Units
Development Agreements Entered
0
1,000 Gross Square Feet
into Prior to July 10, 1989
01
Dwelling Units
Reconstruction of Buildings
0
1,000 Gross Square Feet
Damaged in April 1992 Civil Unrest
1 01
Dwelling Units
Reconstruction of Buildings
0
1,000 Gross Square Feet
Damaged in Jan 1994 Earthquake
1 01
Dwelling Units
Total Dwelling Units
0
Total Non - residential sq ft (in 1,000s)
0
Section /, Page 4
Exempted Development Definitions:
1 LowNery Low Income Housing As defined by the California Department of Housing and Community
Development as follows
-Low-income equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size
- Very Low - Income equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size
2 High Density Residential Near Rail Stations Development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger
station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under
the local general plan and zoning ordinance A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre
is automatically considered high density
3 Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations Mixed -use development located within 114 mile of a fixed rail passenger
station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high
density residential housing
4 Development Agreements Projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section
65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989
5 Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non - residential structure which is damaged or destroyed,
to the extent of > or = to 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calamity
6 Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations and
where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval /disapproval authority These locally
precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LDR
017
(�
\\
§
\� }
\\ \/
\) \§
k
/
\
z
B
.;.
�..
�w�
■
■.
■■@
��
�
•
°
�
!
\�
\�
2
}
j
�/
•
k
/
\
z
B
018
.;.
�..
�w�
■
■.
■■@
��
�
•
°
�
!
2
; ;
;.
IN
I
§
§
,■
,
,
!
|
•-■
!
!
!
|
|
!
!
1M
z
z
l§
|
!
- --
--
- -
-
- -
- -;
;
-
!
/
!-
ii
MEN
%2
| -!
;�
!
!
}
§
f
,.
|
||§
|k
|(\
!_!0-
■
; -,■
!
7777
|!!k�`
°
|
_§
f,|
§!
|(|.s_&
.
�.�0
8al2
,
.
■
�
018
/
\
k
LU
k
\
k�
[
(
k
k
}
§
!
!
!
!
"
|.
.
am
a
k(
!!
)!
§!
|!
§!
F.7.1
F.T.1
�
•7j/
[
f\
Z
0
\ f)!
k \)
/)!
■§
;
!
!
.,
..
.
|!!
!!
■
!
4
0-
0
#
\
G
'
A
■
�
f)
-
oil
--------
--
-----
!■
----
_
\�!
.�
}!2
-
.f
'!!
«E
V!
\��°
2
/)
k���
0
§//
(
\
�k
{�
j.
!
■;
!�!|
f!l
.
|.!!!k_
!
! |!e
�|§_!
■k
|`
;
$
§
|k|k
USE
k2k
|
|
Pol
k�
[
(
k
k
}
§
)
E
010
!
!
!
!
am
a
k(
!!
)!
§!
|!
§!
F.7.1
F.T.1
�
•7j/
[
f\
Z
0
\ f)!
k \)
/)!
)
E
010
4g 3z
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 2, 2005
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING- Special Orders of Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action (public hearing) regarding a Resolution of the City of El
Segundo, California, finding the City to be in conformance with the annual Congestion
Management Program (CMP) and adopting the annual CMP Local Development Report, in
accordance with California Government Code Section 65089
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
1 Hold Public Hearing,
2 Read Resolution by title only,
3 Adopt Resolution, and /or
4 Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
The Congestion Management Program (CMP) became effective with voter approval of
Proposition 111 in June 1990 The CMP is a tool to facilitate coordination between
transportation and land use decisions It requires agencies to weigh the impacts of traffic
generated by developments and requires the mitigation of additional congestion In
accordance with State law, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
(MTA) has adopted the CMP for Los Angeles County Cities within the County are required
to comply with the adopted CMP or risk the loss of Gas Tax revenues received pursuant to
Proposition III
(Continued on the next page)
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
1 Resolution for adoption
2 2005 Local Development Report
FISCAL IMPACT. None
Capital Improvement Program
N/A
Amount Requested
N/A
Account Number-
N/A
Project Phase
N/A
Appropriation Required.
N/A
ORIGINA D BY- DATE:
Rto� a Fintnn rlircr4 of Pi iFdir 1A /nr4e
010 1
STAFF REPORT PAGE 2
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION. (cont.)
The MTA requires that by September I" of each year, local agencies submit a self-
certification Resolution and a Local Development Report pursuant to a noticed public
hearing as required by State law
The self - certification Resolution consists of the following.
A finding that the City is in conformance with the CMP.
2 Certification that the City will continue to Implement the Transportation Demand
Management Ordinance (City Zoning Code, Chapter 15 -16)
3 Certification that the City will continue to Implement a Land Use Analysis Program
(City Council Resolution No 3805)
4 2005 Local Development Report
In previous years, the CMP required the City to calculate the total debits and credits
accruing from building and demolition permits and transportation Improvement strategies
and to maintain a positive credit balance The City's credit balance as of May 31, 2003 was
6,642 On February 18, 2004, MTA suspended the requirement that cities maintain a
positive credit balance and suspended the requirement to calculate credits and debits
resulting from construction activity and transportation Improvements strategies, while It
prepares a nexus study to explore the feasibility of Implementing a congestion mitigation
fee to meet CMP Deficiency Plan requirements The City's current credit balance remains
frozen until MTA completes Its study.
This year the City Is only required to report the number of dwelling units permitted and the
floor area of new non - residential buildings and demolitions The attached Local
Development Report summarized the development activity for the June 1, 2004 to May 31,
2005 reporting year
Staff from the Departments of Public Works and Planning and Budding Safety have worked
together to develop the Local Development Report
P \Planning & Building Safety \CMP\2005CMP CCReport doc 7/25/05 revised
oil