Loading...
CC RESOLUTION 4432RESOLUTION NO. X432 A RESOLUTION FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 65089. The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows SECTION 1 The City Council finds that A The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority ( "MTA "), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the 1999 Congestion Management program in December 1999; B As adopted, the CMP requires that MTA annually determine that Los Angeles County and cities within the County conform with all CMP requirements, C Among other things, the CMP requires municipalities within Los Angeles County to submit Local Development Reports to the MTA by September 1 each year; D The City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 2, 2005, E Based upon the August 2, 2005 public hearing, the City Council determined that By June 15 of odd - numbered years the City conducts annual traffic counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System Chapter, The City adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand management ordinance consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management Chapter, The City adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program Chapter, and The City has adopted a Local Development Report, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the Draft 2005 CMP This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City with transportation improvements, and demonstrates that the City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency Plan consistent with the MTA Board adopted 2003 Short Range Transportation Plan SECTION 2 In accordance with its findings, the City Council detennmes that the City of El Segundo is in compliance with all requirements of the 1999 CMP, as amended SECTION 3 This Resolution will remain effective until superseded by a subsequent resolution SECTION 4 This Resolution will take effect immediately upon adoption PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of August, 1005 f Kelly McDoOa, Mayor City of El Segundo APPROVED Mark D Hen H Berger, AssXtar# City Attorney ATTEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 1 I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five, that the foregoing Resolution No 4432 was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 2nd day of August 2005, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote AYES McDowell, Gaines, Boulgarides, Busch, Jacobson NOES None ABSENT None ABSTAIN None IA 1"� 6 U/YIM d" Cindy Mort en, City Clerk CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Date Prepared. July 26, 2005 2005 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2004 - MAY 31, 2005 Contact: Kimberly Christensen, Planning Manager Phone Number. (310) 524 -2340 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY * IMPORTANT, All "#value'" cells on this page are automatically calculated. Please do not enter data in these cells. DEVELOPMENT TOTALS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Dwelling Units Single Family Residential 7.00 Multi- Family Residential 3400 Group Quarters 000 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Commercial (less than 300,000 sq ft) Commercial (300,000 sq ft or more) Freestanding Eating & Drinking NON - RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Lodging Industrial Office (less than 50,000 sq ft ) Office (50,000- 299,999 sq ft ) Office (300,000 sq ft or more) Medical Government Institutional /Educational University (# of students) OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY ENTER IF APPLICABLE ENTER IF APPLICABLE EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT TOTALS Exempted Dwelling Units Exempted Non - residential sq ft (in 1,00 1,000 Net Sq.Ft.Z 4.06 0.00 000 1.000 Net So.Ft.Z 0.00 27.05 7.28 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 000 Daily Trips 0.00 000 0 1 Note Please change dates on this form for later years Section I, Page 1 2 Net square feet is the difference between new development and adjustments entered on pages 2 and 3 014 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Date Prepared: July 26, 2005 2005 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2004 - MAY 31, 2005 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter " If there are no data for that category, enter "0 " PART O. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Dwelling Units Single Family Residential 21.00 Multi-Family Residential 47.00 Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Commercial less than 300,000 sq ft 0.00 Commercial 300,000 sq ft or more) 000 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 000 NON - RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Lodging 0.00 Industrial 8729 Office less than 50,000 sq ft 728 Office 50,000 - 299,999 sq ft 0.00 Office 300,000 sq ft or more) 000 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 Institutional /Educational 0.00 University # of students) 000 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Daily Trips (Enter "0" if none ENTER IF APPLICABLE 000 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 Section 1, Page 2 015 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Date Prepared: July 26, 2005 2005 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2004 - MAY 31, 2005 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0 " PART2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS IMPORTANT Adjustments maybe claimed only for 1) development permits that were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure with the reporting eriod RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Dwelling Units Single Family Residential 14.00 Multi-Family Residential 13.00 Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Commercial less than 300,000 sq ft 4.06 Commercial 300,000 sq ft or more 000 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 000 NON - RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Lodging 0.00 Industrial 114.34 Office less than 50,000 sq ft) 0.00 Office 50,000 - 299,999 sq ft 0.00 Office 300,000 sq ft or more) 0.00 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 Institutional /Educational 0.00 University # of students 000 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description (Attach additional sheets if necessa ) Daily Trips (Enter "0" if none ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 016 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Date Prepared: July 26, 2005 2005 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2005 - MAY 31, 2005 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter " If there are no data for that category, enter "0 " '•' D DEVELOPMENT (NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS) LowNery Low Income Housing I�J Dwelling Units High Density Residential 0 Dwelling Units Near Rail Stations Mixed Use Developments 0 1,000 Gross Square Feet Near Rail Stations 1 01 Dwelling Units Development Agreements Entered 0 1,000 Gross Square Feet into Prior to July 10, 1989 01 Dwelling Units Reconstruction of Buildings 0 1,000 Gross Square Feet Damaged in April 1992 Civil Unrest 1 01 Dwelling Units Reconstruction of Buildings 0 1,000 Gross Square Feet Damaged in Jan 1994 Earthquake 1 01 Dwelling Units Total Dwelling Units 0 Total Non - residential sq ft (in 1,000s) 0 Section /, Page 4 Exempted Development Definitions: 1 LowNery Low Income Housing As defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as follows -Low-income equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size - Very Low - Income equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size 2 High Density Residential Near Rail Stations Development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density 3 Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations Mixed -use development located within 114 mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high density residential housing 4 Development Agreements Projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989 5 Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non - residential structure which is damaged or destroyed, to the extent of > or = to 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calamity 6 Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations and where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval /disapproval authority These locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LDR 017 (� \\ § \� } \\ \/ \) \§ k / \ z B .;. �.. �w� ■ ■. ■■@ �� � • ° � ! \� \� 2 } j �/ • k / \ z B 018 .;. �.. �w� ■ ■. ■■@ �� � • ° � ! 2 ; ; ;. IN I § § ,■ , , ! | •-■ ! ! ! | | ! ! 1M z z l§ | ! - -- -- - - - - - - -; ; - ! / !- ii MEN %2 | -! ;� ! ! } § f ,. | ||§ |k |(\ !_!0- ■ ; -,■ ! 7777 |!!k�` ° | _§ f,| §! |(|.s_& . �.�0 8al2 , . ■ � 018 / \ k LU k \ k� [ ( k k } § ! ! ! ! " |. . am a k( !! )! §! |! §! F.7.1 F.T.1 � •7j/ [ f\ Z 0 \ f)! k \) /)! ■§ ; ! ! ., .. . |!! !! ■ ! 4 0- 0 # \ G ' A ■ � f) - oil -------- -- ----- !■ ---- _ \�! .� }!2 - .f '!! «E V! \��° 2 /) k��� 0 §// ( \ �k {� j. ! ■; !�!| f!l . |.!!!k_ ! ! |!e �|§_! ■k |` ; $ § |k|k USE k2k | | Pol k� [ ( k k } § ) E 010 ! ! ! ! am a k( !! )! §! |! §! F.7.1 F.T.1 � •7j/ [ f\ Z 0 \ f)! k \) /)! ) E 010 4g 3z EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 2, 2005 AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING- Special Orders of Business AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Consideration and possible action (public hearing) regarding a Resolution of the City of El Segundo, California, finding the City to be in conformance with the annual Congestion Management Program (CMP) and adopting the annual CMP Local Development Report, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65089 RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION 1 Hold Public Hearing, 2 Read Resolution by title only, 3 Adopt Resolution, and /or 4 Alternatively discuss and take other action related to this item BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION The Congestion Management Program (CMP) became effective with voter approval of Proposition 111 in June 1990 The CMP is a tool to facilitate coordination between transportation and land use decisions It requires agencies to weigh the impacts of traffic generated by developments and requires the mitigation of additional congestion In accordance with State law, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) has adopted the CMP for Los Angeles County Cities within the County are required to comply with the adopted CMP or risk the loss of Gas Tax revenues received pursuant to Proposition III (Continued on the next page) ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS 1 Resolution for adoption 2 2005 Local Development Report FISCAL IMPACT. None Capital Improvement Program N/A Amount Requested N/A Account Number- N/A Project Phase N/A Appropriation Required. N/A ORIGINA D BY- DATE: Rto� a Fintnn rlircr4 of Pi iFdir 1A /nr4e 010 1 STAFF REPORT PAGE 2 BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION. (cont.) The MTA requires that by September I" of each year, local agencies submit a self- certification Resolution and a Local Development Report pursuant to a noticed public hearing as required by State law The self - certification Resolution consists of the following. A finding that the City is in conformance with the CMP. 2 Certification that the City will continue to Implement the Transportation Demand Management Ordinance (City Zoning Code, Chapter 15 -16) 3 Certification that the City will continue to Implement a Land Use Analysis Program (City Council Resolution No 3805) 4 2005 Local Development Report In previous years, the CMP required the City to calculate the total debits and credits accruing from building and demolition permits and transportation Improvement strategies and to maintain a positive credit balance The City's credit balance as of May 31, 2003 was 6,642 On February 18, 2004, MTA suspended the requirement that cities maintain a positive credit balance and suspended the requirement to calculate credits and debits resulting from construction activity and transportation Improvements strategies, while It prepares a nexus study to explore the feasibility of Implementing a congestion mitigation fee to meet CMP Deficiency Plan requirements The City's current credit balance remains frozen until MTA completes Its study. This year the City Is only required to report the number of dwelling units permitted and the floor area of new non - residential buildings and demolitions The attached Local Development Report summarized the development activity for the June 1, 2004 to May 31, 2005 reporting year Staff from the Departments of Public Works and Planning and Budding Safety have worked together to develop the Local Development Report P \Planning & Building Safety \CMP\2005CMP CCReport doc 7/25/05 revised oil