CC RESOLUTION 4219RESOLUTION NO. _42j_g
A RESOLUTION FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH
THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND
ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 65089.
The city council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The city council finds that:
A. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority ( "MTA "), acting as the
Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the 1999
Congestion Management program in December 1999;
B. As adopted, the CMP requires that MTA annually determine that Los Angeles
County and cities within the County conform with all CMP requirements;
C. Among other things, the CMP requires municipalities within Los Angeles County
to submit Local Implementation Reports to the MTA by September 1 each year;
D. The City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 7, 2001 during which it
considered the evidence presented by staff and the public regarding how the City
has implemented measures designed to mitigate the impacts of traffic congestion
resulting from new development;
E. Based upon the August 7, 2001 public hearing, the City Council determined that
By June 15 of odd- numbered years the City conducts annual traffic counts
and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections
consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and
Roadway System Chapter;
2. The City adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand
management ordinance consistent with the minimum requirements
identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management Chapter;
3. The City adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program
consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land
Use Analysis Program Chapter; and
12:14 PM
Resolution No. 4919
Adopting CMP Local Implementation Report
4. The City adopted the attached Year 2001 Local Implementation Report,
which is incorporated into this Resolution, consistent with the
requirements identified in the CMP. This report balances traffic
congestion impacts due to growth within the City with transportation
improvements, and demonstrates that the City meets its responsibilities
under the County -wide Deficiency Plan.
SECTION 2: In accordance with its findings, the City Council determines that the City of El
Segundo is in compliance with all requirements of the 1999 CMP.
SECTION 3: This Resolution will remain effective until superseded by a subsequent resolution.
SECTION 4: This Resolution will take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7thday of August , 2001.
Mike Gordon, Mayor
City of El Segundo
APPROVED AS TO
Mark D. Hensley; Ci
Karl H. Berger,, ~Aysistant City Attorney
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
I, Cindy Mortesen, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the
whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution
No. 4219 was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor
of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said
2 12:14 PM
Resolution No. 4219
Adopting CMP Local Implementation Report
Council held on the 7th day of August 2001, and the same was so passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES: Gordon, jacobs, Gaines and McDowell
NOES: None
3 12:14 PM
Resolution No. 4219
Adopting CMP Local Implementation Report
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
Date Prepared:
27- Jul -01
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 11 2000 - MAY 319 2001
Contact: Paul Garry
Phone Number: (310) 524 -2342
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY
2001 DEFICIENCY PLAN
1. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal
[from Section 1]
......................
(6,921)
Exempted Dwelling Units
0
Exempted Non - residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s)
0
2. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims
[from Section 11]
......................
1,255
Land Use Strategy Claims
3
Capital Improvement Claims
1
Transit Claims
0
TDM Claims
1
Total Strategies Claimed
5
Subtotal Current Credit (Goal)
......................
5,665
3. Carryover Credit from Last Year's (2000)
Local Implementation Report
......................
8,298
Net Deficiency Plan Credit Balance:
......................
2,633
LI R_2000.2001
Section 1, Page 1
IE
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Date Prepared:
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 11 2000 - MAY 319 2001
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
-A- DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
27- Jul -01
Category
Dwelling
Units
Debit
Value /DU
Debits
Single Family Residential
5.00
x
6.80 =
34
Multi-Family Residential
0.00
x
4.76 =
0
Group Quarters
0.00
x
1.98 =
0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
ACTIVITY
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Debit
Value /1000SF
Debits
Commercial (less than 300,000 s
.ft.)
0.00
x
22.23 =
0
Commercial (300,000 s .ft. or more)
0.00
x
17.80 =
0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking
0.00
x
66.99 =
0
NON- RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Debit
Value /1000SF
Debits
Lodging
0.00
x
7.21 =
0
Industrial
164.38
x
6.08 =
999
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.)
15.50
x
16.16 =
250
Office (50,000 - 299,999 s .ft.)
Office (300,000 s .ft. or more)
577.76
0.00
x
x
10.50 =
7.35 =
6,066
0
Medical
0.00
x
16.90 =
0
Government
0.00
x
20.95 =
0
Institutional /Educational
0.14
x
7.68 =
1
University
0.00
x
1.66 =
0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description
(Attach additional sheets if necessary
Daily Trips
0 1
Debit
Value/Trip
Debits
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
0.001
0.001
x
x
0.71 =
0.71 =
0
0
Subtotal New Development Activity
Adjustments (Optional) --Complete Part 2
-
0 =
7,351
431
Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal (Points)
_
(6,921)
LI R_2000.2001
Section I, Page 2
15
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Date Prepared: 27-Jul-01
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
Enter information where it says "Enter." If not applicable, enter "0" so it will total.
PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT
IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that
were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and
2) demolition of any structure within the reporting period.
'RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
Dwelling
Units
Adjustment Subtotal
Value /DU
Single Family Residential
7.00
x 6.80 = 48
Multi-Family Residential
0.00
x 4.76 = 0
Group Quarters
0.00
x 1.98 = 0
COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Adjustment Subtotal
Value /1000SF
Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.)
2.03
x 22.23 = 45
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more)
0.00
x 17.80 = 0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking
0.00
x 66.99 = 0
NON- RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Adjustment Subtotal
Value /1000SF
Lodging
0.00
x 7.21 = 0
Industrial
55.62
x 6.08 = 338
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.)
0.00
x 16.16 = 0
Office (50,000. 299,999 sq.ft.)
0.00
x 10.50 = 0
Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more)
0.00
x 7.35 = 0
Medical
0.00
x 16.90 = 0
Government
0.00
x 20.95 = 0
Institutional /Educational
0.00
x 7.68 = 0
University
0.001
x 1.66 = 0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Description
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
None
None
Daily Trips
0
0.00
0.00
Adjustment Subtotal
Value /Trip
x 0.71 = 0
x 0.71 = 0
Total Mitigation Goal Adjustments (Points) = 431
LI R_2000.2001
Section I, Page 3
16
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Date Prepared: 27- Jul -01
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 319 2001
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
D DEVELOPMENT
CLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS)
Low /Very Low Income Housing
High Density Residential
near Rail Stations
Mixed Use Developments
near Rail Stations
Development Agreements entered
into Prior to July 10, 1989
Reconstruction of Buildings
damaged in April 1992 Civil Unrest
Reconstruction of Buildings
damaged in Jan 1994 Earthquake
Total Dwelling Units
Non - residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s)
� I Dwelling Units
I Dwelling Units
1000 Gross Square Feet
0
0 Dwelling Units
1000 Gross Square Feet
0
0 Dwelling Units
1000 Gross Square Feet
0
0 Dwelling Units
1000 Gross Square Feet
0
0 Dwelling Units
I
Exempted Development Definitions:
1. Low /Very Low Income Housing: as defined by the California Department of Housing and
Community Development as follows:
Low- Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size.
Very Low - Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size.
2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail
passenger station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential
density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a
minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density.
3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: mixed use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail
passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development
is used for high density. residential housing.
4. Development Agreements: projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under
Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989.
5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non - residential structure which is damaged or
destroyed, to the extent of not less than 5017. of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake
or other similar calamity.
6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning
regulations and where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval /disapproval
authority. These locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LIR.
LIR_2000.2001 Section I, Page 4
17
U I T Uh L.L StGUNDO Date Prepared: 27- Jul -01
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 319 2001
SECTION II.a - LAND USE CREDIT CLAIMS
Total Land Use Projects: 3 Total Land Use Credits (Points): 715
a= EE,,11 y
�,v 9,. b.i,��,E 1,-"d �r "��6 c k�•�� t .�. 104�i!��
1 2 3 Comm mixed -use @ MMTC, non- retail component. Click on " S.Scope 6.Units
1 136.3 1 4 Hotel near MMTC (El Segundo /Nash Greenline) 105 1,000
7. Address: 2135 E. El Segundo Boulevard
8. Center:
9. Boundaries:
10. Mixed Use:
11. Site Area: 134,208 Square Feet
112. Net Site Acres: 3.08 ACRES
13. Res. Dens.: 0 DUs /Acre
114. Non -Res Density (FAR): 0.8 FAR
15. Other Info: Residence Inn (150 Rooms)
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
6 86 720 2001 $0 100% 3 288 100%
0 432
r,'
'^d i
ik ii ev r f°_.
1 2 3 Non - retail dev't @ MMTC. Click on "MMTC Land Uses" tab for 5.Scope 6.Units
1 133.0 4 Office addition near Aviation /Imperial Station MMTC 15 1,000
7. Address: 2300 E. Imperial Highway
8. Center:
n/a
9. Boundaries:
n/a
10. Mixed Use:
n/a
11. Site Area: 199,069 Square Feet
12. Net Site Acres: 4.57 ACRES
13. Res. Dens.: 0 DUs /Acre
114. Non -Res Density (FAR): 0.1 FAR
15. Other Info: Project is 14,629 s.f. addition to existing 150,842 s.f. building. Total FAR is 0.83:1
17 9 21 22 24
1rz6 1e.8 2'.3
8
100% 3 31 100% 47 5 3 7 n
` �20
8I w . 1..
T v , gn_ a r
fi rw , �
- .
1 2 3 Transit friendly parking design. Non - retail 5.Scope 6.Units
1 151.3 1 4 Continental Grand Plaza II Office Bldg. 246 1,000
7. Address: 400 Continental Blvd.
8. Center:
9. Boundaries:
10. Mixed Use:
11. Site Area: 246,000 Square Feet 12. Net Site Acres: 5.65 ACRES
13. Res. Dens.: • 0 DUs /Acre 14. Non -Res Density (FAR): 1.0 FAR
15. Other Info: EA -268, 1/4 mile from Green Line Station (1st milestone approved in 1998)
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
1.60
394
2001
$16,000
100%
3
158
100%
236
LI R_2000.2001
Section II.a, Page 1
13
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Date Prepared: 27- Jul -01
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001
SECTION II.b - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CREDIT CLAIMS
Total Cap. Imp. Projects: 1 Total Cap. Imp. Credit (Points): 313
1
1
2
243.3
3 Peak pd parking restriction - CMP Arterial.(4+ hr)
S.Scope
0.1
6.Units
lane mile
4 Sepulveda Blvd.
7. Str. Name: Sepulveda Boulevard
S. From /To: Grand Avenue to El Segundo Boulevard
9. Intersection: na 10. Map Page: 622
11. Participants: City
12. MTA Funding: 100%
13. Your share of local funding: 100%
15. other Info: 0.0757 lane miles eliminated
14. Portion of Project within your jurisdiction: 100%
parking. No funding required by MTA
16
Credit
E. Factor
4,140
17
Project
Value
313
18
Expected
Completio
2001
-19
Project Cos
in 1,000s
0
20
Local
%
100 %p
21
Current
Milestone
3
22
Prior Year
Credits
0
23
Milestone
Factor
100%
24
Net
Value
313
LI R_2000 -2001
Section ll.b, Page 1
19
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Date Prepared: 27- Jul -01
2001 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 19 2000 - MAY 319 2001
SECTION II.e - TDM CREDIT CLAIMS
Total TDM Projects: 1 Total TDMCredit (Points):
227
1 321.0
CMP TDM Ordinance
Non - Residential building permits issued, as reported in Section I
No other description /entries required for this strategy. This is already
757.78 1000 gsf
done for you.
16
0.30
17
227
18
n/a
1 19
n/a
20
100 "o
1 21
3
22
n/a
23
100%
24
227
LI R_2000.2001
Section [Le, Page 1
20