CC RESOLUTION 2451I 3, 0 ,,
s w
RESOLUTION NO. 2451
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA AUTHORI-
ZING SETTLEMENT OF CERTAIN LITIGATION.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO RESOLVES
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the settlement of the suit filed on behalf of
the City of E1 Segundo against Witco Chemical Corporation and Robert L.
Feldman entitled The State of California, et al. , v. Standard Oil Company
of California, et al. , Civil Action No. 51107, a copy of which is attached
hereto, is hereby authorized, approved and ratified.
SECTION 2. That the Mayor Pro Tempore be and he is hereby
authorized to execute and deliver the final release approved by the Attorney
General (Exhibit C of the Settlement Agreement) and the Attorney General is
hereby authorized to cause the suit to be dismissed without prejudice, each
party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 14th day of August
, 1972.
ayor vro 'rempore
ATTEST:
Jane D. Hough
City Clerk
• (SEAL) r
By: p( z_
eputy
J
'I-
li
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
171
18'.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32.
I i "I f ) I
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
1. Witco Chemical Corporation ( "Witco ") and Robert L.
Feldman ( "Feldman ") are named as defendants in certain antitrust
cases brought by various governmental entities alleging violations
of the Sherman Act in connection with the manufacture and sale of
liquid asphalt. These cases, along with the cases described in
paragraph 2, have been consolidated for pretrial purposes and are
currently pending in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California. (In re Coordinated Pretrial
Proceedings in the Western Liquid Asphalt Cases, Master File
No. 50173 RES.) A list of such cases, and the names of all
plaintiffs and intervenors, is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
2. A number of other private antitrust cases brought by
governmental and other entities alleging violations of the Sherman
Act in connection with the manufacture and sale of- liquid asphalt
have been consolidated for pretrial purposes along with those cases
listed on Exhibit A, and are also currently pending in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California.
None of these cases names either Witco or Feldman as a defendant,
but the allegations in these cases are essentially the same.as in
the Exhibit A cases. These cases, and the names of all plaintiffs
and intervenors, are listed on Exhibit B hereto.
3. Witco and Feldman and all plaintiffs and intervenors
desire to enter into this Settlement Agreement with respect to all
cases listed in Exhibits A and B, upon the basis hereinafter set
forth.
4. The undersigned counsel for plaintiffs and intervenorE
are authorized to enter into this Settlement Agreement on behalf of
all the plaintiffs and intervenors in all actions listed on
Exhibits A and B, subject to ratification and confirmation by each
E X H I B I T 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29'
301
311
321
of the plaintiffs and intervenors.
5. This agreement has been reached solely in order to
avoid the expense, inconvenience and uncertainty and delay incident
upon further litigation of these claims, and without the admission
of any liability on the part of any defendant.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between the plaintiffs
and intervenors shown on Exhibits A and B hereto, and each of the
defendants Witco and Feldman, that:
Agreement
6. At closing, liaison counsel for plaintiffs (Office of
the Attorney General of California, Michael I. Spiegel) shall
deliver to counsel for Witco and Feldman separate Final Releases
duly executed by an authorized officer of each plaintiff and
intervenor in all cases listed on Exhibits A and B, said releases
to be substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C.
7. At closing, liaison counsel for plaintiffs shall
deliver to counsel for Witco and Feldman a certified copy of a duly
adopted and certified resolution substantially in the form attached
hereto as Exhibit D (or other written action having equivalent
legal effect) for each plaintiff and intervenor in all cases listed
on Exhibit A, specifically approving and ratifying this Settlement
Agreement and the execution of the Final Release, and approving and
authorizing the entry of the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal
pursuant to paragraphs 9 and 16 hereof.
8. At closing, liaison counsel for plaintiffs shall
deliver to counsel for Witco and Feldman a certified copy of a duly
adopted and certified resolution substantially in the form attached
hereto as Exhibit E (or other written action having equivalent
legal effect) for each plaintiff and intervenor in all cases listed
on Exhibit B, specifically approving and ratifying this Settlement
Agreement and the execution of the Final Release. Any plaintiff or
intervenor that is not a government entity shall submit an
2
i
1 equivalent document executed by an authorized officer thereof.
2 9. Each of the civil actions listed in Exhibit A hereto
3 shall be dismissed without prejudice as to defendants Witco and
4 Feldman, with each party to pay its own costs and attorneys' fees.
5 At closing, liaison counsel for plaintiffs will deliver to counsel
6 for Witco and Feldman a separate Stipulation and Order of Dismissal
7 for each of the cases listed on Exhibit A, in the form attached
8 hereto as Exhibit F, duly signed by all attorneys of record
9 specifically authorizing and approving the entry of same.
10 10. Feldman shall dismiss without prejudice his appeal
11 presently pending before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the
12 case of Maricopa County v. American Petrofina, Robert L. Feldman,
13 No. 71 -1350. At the closing, counsel for Feldman shall deliver to
14 liaison counsel for plaintiffs an appropriate stipulation dismissing
15 such appeal.
16 11. At closing, Witco will deliver to liaison counsel for
17 plaintiffs its check in the sum of Seventy -Five Thousand Dollars
18 ($75,000) payable as directed by liaison counsel, plus interest
19 from the date of this agreement until the closing date or until a
20 date three (3) months subsequent to the date of this agreement,
21 whichever comes first, at a rate of four percent (4 %) per annum.
22 Plaintiffs acknowledge that the proceeds of said check will be used
23 to the benefit of all plaintiffs and intervenors in all cases listed
24 on Exhibits A and B hereto, but Witco and Feldman will have no
25 responsibility for distribution or allocation of such proceeds.
26 12. It is understood that neither the settlement herein
27 referred to nor the consideration to be paid therefor is predicated
28 upon any sales of asphalt made to plaintiffs or intervenors, or any
29 of them, directly or indirectly, by any defendant or other supplier
30 of asphalt, or any of their subsidiaries or affiliates.
31 13. It is further expressly agreed that plaintiffs, and
32 each of them, reserve and maintain that neither such settlement, nor
3
1
2
31
41
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
I
15I
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
the consideration therefor shall in any way or to any extent relate
to, limit, narrow, waive or otherwise affect in any manner or
degree, any right or rights which plaintiffs or intervenors, or any
of them, may have against any other defendant or other supplier of
asphalt, or any of their subsidiaries, affiliates, officers or
employees.
14. Witco agrees to make its documents available
pursuant to existing discovery orders upon reasonable request by
liaison counsel for plaintiff.
15. Counsel for the parties hereto each agree to
recommend in good faith, without qualification, and with full
measure of support, the settlement set forth herein to their
respective client or clients, it being expressly understood that
ratification by all clients is necessary. Counsel for the parties
hereto each agree to use every effort to obtain the necessary
r
ratification of the settlement by their respective clients as
expeditiously as possible.
16. Undersigned counsel for plaintiffs and intervenors
shall not recommend the filing of any further actions by any
government entity or any other person or business concern alleging
violations of the antitrust laws in connection with the manufacture
or sale of liquid asphalt naming Witco and /or Feldman as a defendant.
Undersigned counsel for plaintiffs and intervenors represent that
at the present time they are not aware of the existence or intenti
of filing of any such suit.
17. The "closing date" referred to herein shall be five
(5) days from and after the date on which liaison counsel for
plaintiffs notify counsel for Witco and Feldman that all plaintiffs
and intervenors have ratified the settlement. The Stipulation and
Order of Dismissal shall be filed on the Closing Date. Liaison
counsel for plaintiffs and counsel for Witco and Feldman shall
communicate the settlement to Judge Russell E. Smith, and request
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14I
1511
161
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
that he approve the settlement and sign and enter the orders of
dismissal.
18. This Settlement Agreement (unless, in the opinion of
counsel for any party hereto it is required by law, statute,
i
ordinance or regulation) shall not be filed with the court papers
and shall not be furnished or disclosed to anyone other than Judge
Russell E. Smith, the parties hereto and their attorneys and the
necessary officers and agents. The only settlement papers to be
filed with the court shall be the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal
in the form attached hereto'as Exhibit F.
19. This Settlement Agreement may be executed and
delivered in several counterparts, each of which, when so executed
and delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall
together constitute but one and the same instrument.
ENTERED INTO this day of March, 1972.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA (51107)
Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
STATE OF ARIZONA (51092)
Pima County
Conconino County
Cochise County
City of Yuma
City of Jouglas
CITY & COU'14TY OF SAN FRANCISCO
(51331)
5
GIBSON, DUNN &-CRUTCHER
IRWIN F. WOODLAND
PAUL G.
aul u. Bower
Attorneys for Witco Chemical
Corporation and Robert L.
Feldman
MICHAEL I. SPIEGEL
Deputy Attorney General
FREDERICK P. FURTH
PETER C. HALEY
39
MILTON H. MARES
Deputy City Attorney
By
11I CITY OF SAN DIEGO (C -69 -589 &
C -70 -186)
21
I
311
4 !I
5I� STATE OF OREGON (50173)
I
I;
6' ,
gi STATE OF WASHINGTON (C -70 -187)
i STATE OF ALASKA (C -70 -184)
9�
I
10
11iI
STATE OF ALASKA (C -70 -184)
1211
I
13
14�(MARICOPA CO., ARIZONA (C -70 -185)
15
I r
16 II
17iCASCADE CONSTRUCTION CO. (49638)
PIONEER CONSTRUCTION CO. (49808)
18�
19 !I
20: DEAN MILLER ( 4 8 3 91)
1,11 PAGE PAVING CO. (50307)
21KLAMATH COUNTY (51258)
, CITY OF PORTLAND, ORE. (C -69 -4)
22 S0140MA CO. ( 517 01)
23
i!CITY OF SANTA CLARA (52337)
24
25'
I
26
2711WAKIAKUM CO., WASH.
'TOWN OF LANGLEY, WASH.
28 ISLAND CO., WASH.
I�CITY OF EVERETT, WASH.
29;GRANT CO., WASH.
(Intervenors In State of Wash.)
30 I,
C.
WI
De
By
EL
AE
By
C.
FE
By
C.
At
By
RC
DE
By
HI
Ca
B�
GL
Of
By
MI
M.
Of
By
T.
Cc
i
i
M. FITZPATRICK, Chief :yep. CAI
LLIAM H. KRONBERGER, JR.
puty City Attorney
WARD A. NUGENT
sistant Attorney General
DAVID SHEPPARD, Esq.
rguson & Burdell
KENT EDWARDS, Esq.
torney General
NALD W. MEYER, Esq.
puty County Attorney
NRY A. CAREY, JR., Esq.
rey & Hanlon
IDO SAVERI, Esq.
fice of Joseph L. Alioto
CHAEL R. DOWNEY, Esq.
VAN SMITH, Esq. j
fice of the City Attorney
PATRICK CORBETT, Esq.
rbett, Siderius & Lonergan
I
I
II
�I
1
2
I
3'
41
5
61
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
KING CO., WASH.
(Intervenor in State of Wash.)
NORTH SHORE SCHOOL DIST. #417,
State of Wasnington
CITY OF SEATTLE, WASH.
(Intervenor in State of Wash.)
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
(C -70 -428)
CITY OF LOS ANGELES (C -70 -540)
CITY OF TUCSON, ARIZONA
(C -70 -56 TUC)
I
I
FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR BOROUGH
(Intervenor in Alaska Case)
I
1
CITY OF KETCHIKAN, ALASKA
(Intervenor in Alaska Case)
I
CITY OF ANCHORAGE, ALASKA
(Inter_venor in Alaska Case)
CITY OF FAIRBANKS, ALASKA
(Intervenor in Alaska Case)
I
I ,
I
7
JA
Ch
By
CA
By
GC
As
By
BP
As
By
FF
De
By
HE
DC
As
By
JC
Fe
By
EE
Ci
By
J.
Ac
By
BE
Ci
By
MES E. KENNEDY, Esq.
ief Civil Deputy
PLINGER & MUNN
RDON F. CRANDALL, Esq.
sistant City Attorney
RRY LEVERANT, Esq.
sistant City Attorney
ANK WAGNER, Esq.
puty City Attorney
i
RBERT E. WILLIAMS, Esq., CA
NALD C. DEAGL_E, Esq.
sistant City Attorney
HN A. CARLSON, Chairman
irbanks North Star Borough
WARD A. STAHLA
ty of Ketchikan
H. SHORTELL, JR.
ting City Attorney
N T. DELAHAY, Esq.
ty Attorney
I
III COPP PAVING CO. (70- 1394 -UWW)
21
3 II
4; STATE OF ARIZONA
CONCONINO CO., ARIZONA
51 COCHISE CO., ARIZONA
PIMA CO. , ARIZONA
611 CITY OF YUMA
CITY OF DOUGLAS
711
I
8
9I
10 1
11
12
I.i
13 {� CITY OF MESA, ARIZONA ( 5109 2 )
14
151
16,MOHAVE CO., ARIZONA
i
17 j
i�
18:1
I
191CITY OF SPOKANE, WASH.
201
I
21j
I
221
I
231
2�
u
2 511
2611
271!
28 li
I,
29,1
I
30 ,
3111
32I1
M.
JACK. CORINBLIT, Esq.
Corinblit & Shapero
By
BERT L. BLUEMLE, Esq.
MES R. HOLMAN, Esq.
lman & Lewis
RY K.-NELSON, Esq.
torney General
ate of Arizona
LaMAR SHELLEY, Esq.
ty Attorney
ONARD C. LANGFORD, Esq.
unty Attorney
MES GILLESPI, Lsq.
I
1
ti
I
RC
By
JP
He
By
GP.
At
St
By
J.
Ci
By
Ll
Cc
By
JP
By
I _( i 1
°vEESTERN LIQUID ASPIIALT CASES INVOLVING WITCO CHEMICAL CORP. OR ,
ROIi ERT L. F ELDMAN 1 1 ,,
I. State of Oregon v.'Standard Oil, et al. (Witco) No. 50173
Plaintiffs and Intervenors
of
California
'.
State
of Oregon
County
of
Clakamas
City
of
Bend
County
of
Clatsop
City
of
Corvallis
County
of
Gilliam
City
of
Eugene
County
of
Jackson
City
of
Hillsboro
County
of
Lane
City
of
Lake Oswego
County
of
Marion
City
of
Medford
County
of
Morrow
City
of
Salem
County
of
Multnomah
City
of
•
County
of
Polk
City
of
Merced
County
of
Tillamook
City
of
Modesto
County
of
Washington
II. State
of California, et al.
vs. Standard
Oil, No. 51107
et al.
Camarillo
(Witco and Feldman)
of
Montclair
City
Plaintiffs & Intervenors
State
of
California
City
of
La Habra
City
of
Alhambra
City
of
Livermore
City
of
Anaheim
City
of
Lodi
City
of
Arcadia
City
of
Lompoc
City
of
Arcata
City
of
Manhattan Beach
City
of
Bakersfield
City
of
Martinez
City
of
Baldwin Park
City
of
Marysville
City
of
Barstow
City
of
Maywood
City
of
Berkeley
City
of
Menlo Park
City
of
Beverly Bills
City
of
Merced
City
of
Brawley
City
of
Modesto
City
of
Buena Park
City
of
Monrovia
City-of
Camarillo
City
of
Montclair
City
of
Capitola
City
of
Montebello
City
of
Chula Vista
City
of
Monterey Park
City
of
Clovis
City
of
Mountain View
City
of
Compton
City
of
Napa
City
of
Concord
City
of
Norwalk
City
of
Costa Mesa
City
of
Oakland
City
of
Culver City
City
of
Oceanside
City
of
Daly City
City
of
Orange
City
of
Downey
City
of
Pasadena
City
of
E1 Cajon
City
of
Pomona
City
of
El Segundo
City
of
Porterville
City
of
Eureka
City
of
Redding
City
of
Fairfield
City
of
Richmond
City
of
Fontana
City
of
Rio Vista
City
of
Fremont
City
of
Riverside
City
of
Fresno
City
of
Rohnert Park
City
of
Fullerton
City
of
Sacramento
City
of
Glendale
City
of
Salinas
City
of
GonzaleS
City
of
San Bernardino
City
of
Grover City
San Bernardino Bd. Water Cmrs.
City
of
Hanford
City
of
San Fernando
City
of
Hayward
City
of
San Jose
City
of
Iii nLin,;ton Perk
City
of
San Leandro
City
of
Inc! Lo
City
of
San Luis Obispo
City
of
In�Ievjood
City
of
Santa Ana
City
of
Lakewood
City
of
Santa Cruz
EXHIBIT A
(State of California Intervenors -- continued)
City of
S.1nra M.1ria
City () f
S,111ta Monica
City of
` .111 t Rof;a
City 1 >C
S11.1ftCr
City UC
So�lri1 S•111 Francisc
City of
Sunnyvale
City of
TOL7rancc
City of
' _1:,,
City o
i,,L1;,
City of
`,' :c,�viLl
City of
Va1lej0
City o:
City of
�%,:Csonville
City of
1. "Ve l
City of
U stminster
City of
Whittier
County
of Alameda
County
of Butte
County
of El Dorado
County
of Fresno
County
of Glenn
' County
of Iiumboldt
County
of Imperial
County
of Inyo
County
of Kern
County
of Lassen
County
of Los Angeles
LA- Flood
Control District
LA- Unified
School Distric
County
of Madera
General Services - Office
General Services - Office
Department of Public Works
' L.
1 ,�
County of Marin
County of Merced
County of 110c10c
County of Honter.ey
o Cc,unty of Oran;e
County of Plumas
County of Riverside
County of S n T•c rnardino
S: C- i.,arstow Jr. College
S.jC- Building Services Dept.
SEC- Chaffey College Dist.
S',C- City Unified School Dist.
SBC- Purchasing Dept.
SBC- Road Dept.
SEC- Chaffey Union High School Dist.
County of San Diego
County of San Joaquin
County of San Luis Obispo
County of San Mateo
County of Santa Clara
County of Santa Cruz
County of Shasta
County of Si_skiyou
County of Solano
County of Stanislaus
County of Sutter
County of Trinity
County of Tulare '
t County of Ventura
County of Yolo
County of Yuba
of Architecture & Construction
of Procurement
III. State of Arizona v. American Petrofina, Inc.,
et al. (Witco and Feldman)
Plaintiffs & Intervenors
State of Arizona
Graham County
City of
Dou '-las
County of Greenlee
City of
Mesa
County of Mohave
City of
Winslow
Pima County
City of
Yuma
Santa Cruz County
Cochi se
Co1.'aty
Yavapai County
County
of Coconino
IV. Plaintiff Maricopa County v. American Petrofina,
et al. (Witco and Feldman)
V. Plaintiff City of Santa Clara v. Standard Oil,
et al. (Witco)
VI. Plaintiff City of Phoenix v. American Petrofina,
No. C -51092 R.E.S.
No. C -70 -185 R.E.S.
No. 52337
No. C -70 -75 (ARIZ)
R.E.S.
II. City of Los Angeles and Dept. of Water and Power No. C -70 -540 R.E.S.
of the City of Los Angeles v. Standard Oil, et al.
(Witte anti Fe) dnlan)
Plaintiffs Tntervenors
1
City of lot, A11,•.eles
Dept. cif k1ot c•r and Power of the City of Los Angeles,
VIII. Plaintiff Cit of Tucson v. /merical Petrofina, No. 70 -9(18
et ill . (Wi I c (1)
IX � P1 -I i <<t i I f C- 111)l y of CoIlt ra V. SL:111c1ayd Oil, No. 73-3520
ct ell 04iI c1 Intl 1'e 1(1111, 111)
1 '- 11 71. 1'1' r
I.
II.
III.
OTHER WESTERN LIQUID ASPHALT CASES
Plaintiff Cascade Construction Company, Inc. v. No. 49638
Standard Oil, et al.
Plaintiff Pioneer Construction Company v. Standard No. 49808
Oil, et al.
State of Washington, et al. v. Chevron Asphalt,
et al.
Plaintiffs & Intervenors
City of Everett
City of Kennewick
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Port Angeles
City of Puyallup
City of Richland
City of Seattle
Port of Seattle
City of Tacoma
City of Yakima
Lake Washington School Dist.
Northshore School Dist.
Benton County
Chelan County
Franklin County
Grays Harbor County
Grant County
Island County
King County
Kitsap County
Lewis County
Pacific County
San Juan County
Skagit County
County of Skamania
County of Snohomish
Spokane County
Stevens County
Thurston County
Wahkiakum County
Walla Walla County
State of Washington
IV. Plaintiff Page Paving Company v. Standard Oil,
et al.
V. Plaintiff Klamath County, Oregon v. Standard
Oil, et al.
VI. City and County of San Francisco v. Union Oil,
et al.
Plaintiffs & Intervenors
City of San Francisco
County of San Francisco
San Francisco Unified School District
VII. The State of Alaska v. Chevron Asphalt, et al.
Plaintiffs & Intervenors
1-I .-a 7 4
No. C -70 -187
No. 50307
No. 51258
No. 51331 R.E.S.
No. C -70 -187
State of Alaska City of Ketchikan
City of Anchorage Fairbanks North Star Borough
City of Fairbanks
VIII. Plaintiff Sonoma County, California v. Standard No. 51701
Oil, et al.
IX. Plaintiff City of San Diego v. Union Oil
Company, et al.
Ncs. C-69-589;
C -70 -186
X. Plaintiff City of Portland, Oregon v. Standard No. C -69 -4
Oil, et al.
XI. Copp Paving Company, et al. v. Gulf Oil Company,et al. No. C -71 -608 R.E.S.
Plaintiffs & Intervenors
Copp P,ivinf; Company Ernest A. Copp
Copp E'(1111Pnlent Company
JI T•1 X I 1 I 131 '1' 13
1_x''1"
FINAL RELEASE
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged,
acting by and through its duly authorized undersigned officer,
does hereby release and discharge Witco Chemical Corporation
and Robert L. Feldman, and each of them, and the present and
former officers, directors, employees, agents, attorneys,
subsidiaries, affiliates, and successors of each, including
Golden Bear Oil Company, from any and all claims and demands
of whatever nature, anticipated or unanticipated, known or
unknown, as indicated below:
1. All claims and demands based in whole or in
part on the facts, or any of them, asserted in the complaint
or other pleadings, records or documents in the case of
2. All claims and demands based upon monopolization,
attempt to monopolize, conspiracy to monopolize, conspiracy
or combination in restraint of trade, and unfair competition,
in connection with the manufacture, marketing and sale of
liquid asphalt up to and including the date of this release.
3. Any and all claims and demands arising out of,
or by virtue of, any alleged violations of the laws or regula-
tions of the United States Government, or any agency thereof,
or the laws of any of the several states or political divisions
thereof, or any agency thereof, in connection with the manu-
facture, marketing and sale of liquid asphalt up to and
including the date of this release.
EXHIBIT C
1 E:1t6
This release is not intended to and does not release
or in any way narrow any claims against any other person or
entity, including any other defendant named in the case cited
above.
Attorney
r
Executed this day of , 1972.
By
Its Duly Authorized Officer
2
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by
Section 1. That the settlement of the suit filed
on behalf of the [city, county, agency, etc.] against Witco
Chemical Corporation and Robert L. Feldman (case name and
number), as set forth in the Settlement Agreement dated
March , 1972, entered into on behalf of
by its counsel -is hereby
authorized, approved and ratified.
Section 2. That
be and he is hereby authorized to execute and deliver the
Final Release approved by its counsel (Exhibit C to the
Settlement Agreement) and cause the suit to be dismissed
without prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and
attorneys' fees.
EXHIBIT D
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by
Section 1. That the Settlement Agreement dated
March 1972, entered into on behalf of the [city, etc.]
by its counsel is hereby authorized, approved and ratified.
Section 2. That
be and he is hereby authorized to execute and deliver the
Final Release approved by its counsel (Exhibit C to the
Settlement Agreement).
EXHIBIT E
G
Appropriate )
STIPULATION AND ORDER
Case )
OF DISMISSAL
Heading )
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs
and intervenors in this action and defendants Witco Chemical
Corporation and Robert L. Feldman, by and through their
respective attorneys, that this action shall be dismissed
without prejudice as to defendants Witco Chemical Corporation
and Robert L. Feldman. Each such party shall bear its own
costs.
This dismissal is not intended to and does not
dismiss this action, or any part of it, as to any other
defendants.
Attorneys for P ainti s an
Intervenors
Attorneys for Defendants
IT IS SO ORDERED this day of April, 1972.
United States District Judge
EXHIBIT F
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
}
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, )
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO. )
SS
I, JANE D. HOUGH, , City Clerk of the
City of El Segundo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the
whole number of members of the City Council of the said City
is five; that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2451
was duly passed and adopted by the said City Council, approved
and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City
Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of the said Council
held on the 14th day of August 1972
and that the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen McGill, Morgan, Stephens and
Mayor Pro Tempore Nagel
NOES: Councilmen None
ABSENT: Councilmen None
NOT VOTING: Mayor Balmer
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City
this 25th day of August 197 2
JANE D. HOUGH
City Clerk of e City of egun o
California
w" i _ ' !
l:-eputy
(SEAL)