CC RESOLUTION 2450RESOLUTION NO. 2450
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORI-
ZING SETTLEMENT OF CERTAIN LITIGATION.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO RESOLVES
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the settlement of the suit filed on behalf of
the City of El Segundo against Edgington Oil Company entitled The State of
California, et al. v. Standard Oil Company of California, et al., Civil Action
No. 51107, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby authorized, approved
and ratified.
SECTION 2. That the Mayor Pro Tempore be and he is hereby
authorized to execute and deliver the final release approved by the Attorney
General (Exhibit C of the Settlement Agreement) and the Attorney General is
hereby authorized to cause the suit to be dismissed without prejudice, each
party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 14th day of August
. 1972.
ATTEST:
Jane D. Hough
City Clerk
(SEAL) -�,1
By:
Deputy y
M yor Pro Tempore
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
� 13
a
W o„ 14
a
N°^° 15
W
W3; <�
ag "It�
f: 0 W 16
C9az"
a!
U) ii
a
W j U .N 17
.
1
Q 0 � W z
•� Lr J O 18
u =
J Z W
3�� 19
z0
N
0
0 20
0 21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
11 _1
SETTLEMENT AGRE -1 iENT
rl--: A... 1 —
1. Edgington Oil Company ( "Edgington ") is named as a
defendant in certain antitrust cases brought by various govern-
mental entities alleging violations of the Sherman Act in connec-
tion with the manufacture and sale of liquid asphalt. These cases,
along with the cases described in paragraph 2, have been consoli-
dated for pretrial purposes and are currently pending in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California.
(In re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in the Western Liquid
Asphalt Cases, :caster File No. 50173 RES.) A list of such cases,
and the names of all plaintiffs and intervenors, is attached
hereto as Exhibit A.
2. A number of other private antitrust cases brought by
governmental and other entities alleging violations of the Sherman
i
Act in connection with the manufacture and sale of liquid asn.halt
I
Ihave been consolidated for pretrial purposes along with those cases
I
listed on Exhibit A, and are also currently pending in the United
iStates District Court for the Northern District of California.
None of these cases names Edgington as a defendant, but the alle-
gations in these cases are essentially the same as in the.Exhibit
A cases. These cases, and the names of all plaintiffs and
intervenors', are listed on Exhibit B hereto. One case,
No. C -71 -608, with plaintiffs Copp Paving Company, Inc., Copp
Equipment Company, Inc., and Ernest A. Conp (hereinafter collective
"Copp "), names Edgington specifically and has been excluded from
Exhibit B as this Settlement Agreement is intended to extend to
each and every plaintiff and intervenor in all of these antitrust
cases except Copp.
3. Edgington and all plaintiffs and intervenors (except
311 Corp as noted above) desire to enter into this Settlement Agreement
32, with respect to all cases listed in Exhibits A and B, upon the
I
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
>. 13
a
W
. o 14I
45 a o
u0 0 15'i
W 3 , < m
aS "�� 16
o<Z�
�W9u�
<� 17
Z
aoki u 18
c o
N < h V a
�z;
Z 3N1W_ 19
Zo
N 0 J
0 20
0 21
22
23
24
25
26
271
281
11P%:1Q,
basis hereinafter set forth.
4. The undersigned counsel for plaintiffs and inter-
venors are authorized to enter into this Settlement Agreement on
behalf of all the plaintiffs and intervenors in all actions listed
on Exhibits A and B, subject to ratification and confirmation by
each of the plaintiffs and intervenors.
5. This agreement has been reached solely in order to
avoid the expense, inconvenience, uncertainty and delay incident
upon further litigation of these claims, and without the admission
of any liability on the part of any defendant.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between the plaintiff
and intervenors shown on Exhibits A•and B hereto, and defendant
Edgington, that:
Agreement `
r 6. At closing, liaison counsel for plaintiffs (office of
;the Attorney General of California, Michael I. Spiegel) shall
deliver to counsel for Edgington separate Final Releases duly
executed by an authorized officer of each plaintiff and intervenor
in all cases listed on Exhibits A and B, said releases to be
substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C.
7. At closing, liaison counsel for plaintiffs shall
deliver to counsel for Edgington a certified copy of a duly
adopted and certified resolution substantially in the form attached
hereto as Exhibit D (or other written action having equivalent
legal effect) for each plaintiff and intervenor in all cases listad
on E:.hibit A, specifically approving and ratifying this Settlement
Agreement and the execution of the Final Release, and approving andl
authorizing the entry of the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal
29 ',pursuant to paragraphs 9, 16 and 17 hereof.
301
8. At closing, liaison counsol for plaintiffs shall
3lildeliver to counsel for Edgington a certified copy of a duly
32 adopted and certified resolution substantially in the form
1,
l
I
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
121
a- 13
W N 14
a
CIA p0
w3u < 15 �
< m
Q� "Mm 16
WF- �O
4 _
0� �JPI
NN < 17
r W j V
J Zir
a0WWZ
p 18
c J
+Z
Z 3 <r 19
N A
0 20
W
0 21
221
23,
241
25
26
27
28
29
1.1
311
11 2i,")
attached hereto as Exhibit E (or other written action having
equivalent legal effect) for each plaintiff and intervenor in all
cases listed on Exhibit B, specifically approving and ratifying
this Settlement Agreement and the execution of the Final Release.
Any plaintiff or intervenor that is not a government entity shall
submit an equivalent document executed by an authorized officer
thereof.
9. Each of the civil actions listed in Exhibit A hereto
► shall be dismissed :without,prejudice as to defendant Edgington,
with each party to pay its own costs and attorneys' fees. At
closing, liaison counsel for plaintiffs will deliver to counsel
1 for Edgington a separate Stipulation and Order of Dismissal for
each of the cases listed on Exhibit A, in the form attached hereto
as Exhibit F, duly signed by all attorneys of record specifically
auth6rizing and approving the entry of same.
10. At closing, Edgington will deliver to liaison
counsel for plaintiffs its check in the sum of Twenty -Five Thousand
Dollars ($25,000) payable as directed by liaison counsel, plus
interest from the date of this agreement until the closing date or
until a date three (3) months subsequent to the date of this
agreement, whichever comes first, at a rate of four percent (0)
per annum. Plaintiffs acknowledge that the proceeds of said check
`will be used to the benefit of all plaintiffs and intervenors in
all cases listed on Exhibits A and B hereto, but Edgington will have
no responsibility for distribution or allocation of such proceeds.
11. It is understood that neither the settlement herein
referred to nor the consideration to be paid therefor is predicated
upon any sales of asphalt made to plaintiffs or intervenors, or any
of them, directly or indirectly, by any defendant or other supplier
of asphalt, or any of their subsidiaries or affiliates.
12. It is further expressly agreed that plaintiffs, and
32 I; each of them, reserve and maintain that neither such settlement,
- 3 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
W, N e. 14
04 ° 1 J
r
z3�°in
W <a
a5 "11° 16
U.
y J Ol
>ga� 17
W j U v
z
°m -Z 18
� W 0
Na z�
a 3M 19
Y
N �J
0 20
0 21
22
231
241
25
26
27
28
29)
30
I
31;
3211
I
i
1
nor the consideration therefor shall in any way or to any extent
relate to, limit, narrow, waive or otherwise affect in any manner
or degree, any right or rights which plaintiffs or intervenors, or
any of them, may have against any other defendant or other supplier
of asphalt, or any of their subsidiaries, affiliates, officers or
I ,
employees.
13. Edgington agrees to make its documents available
pursuant to existing discovery orders upon reasonable request by
liaison counsel for plaintiff.
14. Counsel for the parties hereto each agree to
recommend in qood faith, without qualification, and with full
measure of support, the settlement set forth herein to their
respective client or clients, it being expressly understood
that ratification by all clients is necessary and a condition
precedent to closing. Counsel for the parties hereto each agree
to use every effort to obtain the necessary ratification of the
settlement by their respective clients as expeditiously as possible
15. Undersigned counsel for plaintiffs and intervenors
shall not recommend the filing of any further actions by any
government entity or any other person or business concern alleging
violations of the antitrust laws in connection with the manufacture)
or sale of liquid asphalt naming Edgington as a defendant.
Undersigned counsel for plaintiffs and intervenors represent that
at the present time they are not aware of the existence or intentio
of filing of any such suit.
24. The "closing date" referred to herein shall be give
(5) days from and after the date on which liaison counsel for
plaintiffs notify counsel for Edgington that all plaintiffs and
intervenors have ratified the settlement. The Stipulation and
Order of Dismissal shall be filed on the Closing Date. Liaison
counsel for plaintiffs and counsel for Edgington shall communicate
the settlement to Judge Russell E. Smith, and request that he
- 4 -
lI
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
�- 13
a
c�
W Cn 14
N
V
N°
z 15
w ;; <m
>g.ZO 16
�ro00
U� z�`
y o J V)
�W3V- 17
�K C] Ui W
U�Lz ws 18
) X0L
a 3; l9
a go
a 20
M
0 21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
approve the settlement and sign and enter the orders of dismissal.
17. This Settle, -ent Agreement (unless, in the opinion
of counsel for any party hereto it is required by law, statute,
ordinance or regulation) shall not be filed with the court papers
and shall not be furnishod or disclosed to anyone other than Judge
Russell E. Smith, the pArties hereto and their attorneys and their
necessary officers and agents. The only settlement papers to be
piled with the court shall be the Stipulation and Order of Dismissa
in tic icn-i attac:ic,: hcrato as Exhibit F.
110j. This Settlement AgreeT,.ent may be executed and
delivered in several counterparts, each of which, when so executed
and delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall
together constitute but one and the sa:ae instrument. It is
understood that this Settic:,ant Aare- orient shall be dated as
of the latest date that any of plaintiffs' counsel execute the
Settlement Agrecn3nt on the signature page(s) as indicated.
ENTERED INTO this day of , 1972.
EDGINGTON OIL COMPANY GROSSMAN SMALTZ GRAVEN & PERRY
Defendant DONALD. SMALTZ
RALPH ,8.1 PERRY IZ1 it
By
B:g Per
STATE OF CALIFORNIA (51107) MICHAEL I. SPIEGEL
Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs Deputv Attorney General
STATE OF ARIZONA (51092)
Pima County
Conconino County
Cochise County
City of Yuma
City of Douqlas
Uri
FREDERICK P. FURTH
PETER C. HALEY
By
CITY & COUINTY OF SAN FRANCISCO MILTON }t. MARES
(51331) Deputy City Attorney
- 5 -
By
II
1II CI';Y OF SAL, DIEGO (C -65 -589 &
211 C -70 -186)
I,
31
4 jl
51i STATE OF OREGON ( 5017 3 )
I.
6
7 I'
I1
8I; STATE OF WASIII14GI -ON (C -70 -187)
STA'T'E OF ALASKA (C -70 -184)
9 �I
10
11 II STATE OF ALASKA (C -70 -184)
1211
13I
14I,MARICOPA CO., ARIZONA (C -70 -185)
151 •
16.1
(i
117.! CASCADE CONSTRUCTION CO. (4 9 6 3 8 )
Ji PIONEER CONSTRUCTION CO. (4 9 8 0 8 )
1811
20 DL•AN MILLER (4,6391)
IjPAGE PAVING CO. (50307)
21;! Ki I�PIATH COU.�TY ( 512 58 )
,CITY OF PORTLAND, ORE. (C -69 -4)
22.' SONOMA CO. . ( 517 01)
23"
CITY OF SA14TA CLARA (52337)
24
i
25
261i
27,- WAXIAKUNI CO. , WASH.
'I TOrV14 OF LANuLEY , WASH.
28 IS'.,A!,J CO. , I';ASH.
i' CITY OF L'VLAL'TT, WASH.
29 I! GRANT CO. , WASH.
(Intervenors In State of Wash.)
301,
32�j/////
I'
if
I� 6
i
11 F• 9A„
C. M. FITZPATRICK, Chief jep. CA!
WILLIAM H. KRONBERGER, JR.
Deputy City Attorney i
By
EDWARD A. 14 GENT
Assistant Attorney General
By
C. DAVID SHEPPARD, Esq.
Ferguson & Burdell
By
C. KENT EDWARDS, Esq.
Attorney General
By
R014ALD W. MEYER, Esq!
Deputy County Attorney
By
HENRY A. CAREY, JR., Esq.
Carey & Ha:llon
Lm
GUIDO SAVERI, Esq.
Office of Joseph L. Alioto
By
MICHAEL R. DOWNEY, Esq.
M. VAN S11ITH, Esq.
Office of the City Attorney
By
T. PA'T'RICK CORBETT , Esq.
Corbett, Siderius & Lonergan
1' KING CO., WASH.
(Intervenor in State of Wash.)
2
3 !I
4i NORTH SHORE SChOOL DIST. #417,
5ii State of Wasnington
6 !�
7! CITY OF SEATTLE, WASH.
1 (Intervenor in State of Wash.)
8 �I
o I�
101' CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
(C -70 -428)
11 �i
12 1'
13 ' CITY OF LOS ANGELES (C -70 -540)
;
141
15,!
161 CITY OF TUCSON, ARIZONA
(C -70 -56 TUC)
17�
181
1
1911
1;
20', FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR BOROUGH
(Intervenor in Alaska Case}
21;
22
23; CITY OF RETCHIKAN, ALASKA
I (Intervenor in Alaska Case)
24!'
25 1.
26;; CITY OF ANCHORAGE, ALASKA
i! (Intervenor in Alaska Case)
271i
28
29 I CITY OF FAIRBANKS, ALASKA
(Intervenor in Alaska Case)
30
31:
;;
32II
i;
I�
JA
Ch
By
CA
By
GC
As
By
BF
As
By
FF
De
By
HE
DC
As
By
JC
Fa
By
EL
Ci
By
i
MES E. KENNEDY, Esq.
ief Civil Deputy
PLINGER & MUNN
RDON F. CRANDALL, Esq.
sistant City Attorney
i
I
.RRY LEVERANT, Esq.
sistant City Attorney\
i
ANK WAGNER, Esq.
puty City Attorney
RBERT E. WILLIAMS, Esq., CA
NA.LD C. DEAGLE, Esq.
sistant City Attorney
HN A. CARLSON, Chairman J
irbanks North Star Borough
• i
WARD A. STAHLA
ty of Ketchikan
1
J. H. SHORTELL, JR.
Acting City Attorney
by
BEN T. DELAHAY, Esq.
City Attorney
By
i
i
i
7
lj
2�
31
4 STATE OF ARIZ014A
CONCONINO CO., ARIZONA
51 COCH I SE CO., A-RIZONA
11
PIMA
CO., KRIZONA
61, CITY
OF
YU1,1A
71,
'CITY
OF
DOUGLAS
811
9
101
11�
121
131j
CITY
OF
MESA, ARIZONA (51092)
14 i�
1511
I'
16 MOHAVE,
CO. , ARIZONA
17 �
18 ;�
19i CITY
OF
SPOKANE, WASH.
20
21
22
23
24
25'
i
261;
27
I'
28
I,
29
70
31
1 _i � `► � 1
ROBERT L. BLUEMLE, Esq.
By
JAMES R. HOLINIAN, Esq.
Holman & Lewis
By
GARY K. NELSON, Esq.
Attorney General
State of Arizona
By
J. LaMAR SHELLEY, Esq.
City Attorney
By
LEONARD C. LANGF'ORD, Esq.
County Attorney
By - -
JAMES GILLESPI, Lsq.
By
0
0
WESTERN LIQUID ASPiIAL'r CASES INVOLVING EDGINGTON OIL COMPANY
li'29�-
I. State of California, et al. vs. Standard Oil, No. 51107
et al.
Plaintiffs & Intervenors
State
of
California
City
of
La Habra
City
of
Alhambra
City
of
Livermore
City,
of
Anaheim
City
of
Lodi
City _of
Arcadia
City
of
Lompoc
City
of
Arcata
City
of
Manhattan Beach
City
of
Bakersfield
City
of
Martinez
City
of
Baldwin Park
City
of
Marysville
City
of
Barstow
City
of
Maywood
City
of
Berkeley
City.
of
Menlo Park
City
of
Beverly Hills
City
of
Merr-ed
City
of
Brawley
City
of
Modesto
City .of
Buena Park
City
of
Monrovia
City
of
Caanaril.lo
City
of
Montclair
City
of
Capitola
City=
of
Montebello
City
of
Chula Vista
City
of
Monterey Park
City
of
Clovis
City
of
Mountain View
City
of
Compton
City
of
Napa
City
of
Concord
City
of
Norwalk
City
of
Costa :Mesa
City
of
Oakland
City
of
Culver City
City
of
Oceanside
City
oL-
Daly City
City
of
orange
City
of
Downey
City
of
Pasadena
City
of
E1 Cajon
City
of
Pomona
City
of
El Segundo
City
of
Porterville
City
of
Eurel.:a
City
of
Redding
City
of
Fairfield
City
of
Richmond.
City
of
Fontana
City
of
Rio Vista
City
of
rr�.imont
City
of
Riverside
City
of
Fresno
City
of
Rohnert Park
City
of
Fullerton
City
of
Sacramento
City
of
Glendale
City
of
Salinas
City
or
(.oilzcales
City
of
Scan Bernardino
City
of
Grover City
San Bernardino Bd. [dater Cmrs.
City
of
Ilan ford
City
of
Stan Fernando
City
of
IIcLyk -inrd
CiLy
of .
San Jose
City
o I-
IItinL i n,;t on Park
City
of
Scan Leandro
CiLy
o�
liidio
City
of
San Luis Obispo
City
of
TII""I�,k.'oOd
City
of
Santa Ana
City
of
L al;c%,,uod
City
of
Santa Cruz
EX1!1B I T A
(State of California Intervenors -- continued)
City of
Santa Maria
County
of
Marin
City of
Santa Monica
County
of
Merced � 1 �;a�F;
City of
S.inta Rb,a
Courl`y
of
Modoc
City of
SliaFtcr
County
of
Wnrerey
City of
South San Francisco
County
of
Orange
City of
Sunnyvale
County
of
Plumas
City of
Torrance
County
of
Riverside
City o
T,:;.-:�rc
County
of
San D(-rnardino
City of
TL;rlock
s,-c- L3rstow Jr. College
City of
VoicaviI10
S:�C- Euilcling
Services Dept.
City of
Vallejo
SEC- Chaffey College Dist.
City o-
SEC- City
Unified School Dist.
City of
1,'- tsonville
SBC- Purchasing
Dept.
City of
`d
SBC- Road
Dept.
City c f
?;c: ;tminster
SRC- Chaffey Union High School Dist.
City of
Whittier
County
of
San Diego
County
of Alarieda
County
of
San Joaquin
County
of BLItte
County
of
San Luis Obispo
County
of El Dorado
County
of
San Mateo
County
of Fresno
County
of
Santa Clara
County
of Glenn
County
of
Santa Cruz
' County
of EumboIdt
County
of
Shasta
County
of Ii;:perial
County
of
Siskiyou
County
of Inyo
County
of
Solario
County
of Kern
County
of
Stanislaus
County
of Lassen
County
of
Sutter
County
of Los Angeles
County
of
Trinity
LA- Flood
Control District
County
of
Tulare '
LA- Unified
School District
County
of
Ventura
County
of Madera
County
of
Yolo
County
of
Yuba '
General
Services - Office of
Architecture
& Construction
General.Services
- Office of
Procurement
Department
of Public Works
II. State of Arizona v. American Petrofina, Inc.,
et al.
Plaintiffs & Intervenors
State of Arizona
City of Douglas
City of 11'1`sa
City of llinslow
City of Yuma
Cochise County
County of Coconino
Graham County
County of Greenlee
County of Mohave
Pima County
Santa Cruz County
Yavapai County
Plaintiff Maricopa County v. American Petrofina,
et al.
IV. Plaintiff City of Santa Clara v. Standard Oil,
et al.
V . Plaint-iff City of Phoenix v. American Petrofina,
V1 City of Los Angeles and Dept. of Wnrcr and Power
of the City of Los Angeles v. Standard Oil, et al.
Plainl-i ff!; & Tint (- )-vonors
No. C -51092 R.E.S.
No. C -70 -185 R.E.S
No. 52337
No. C -70 -75 (ARIZ)
R.E.S.
No. C -70 -540 R.E.S
City of 1.0!, An ; ;cl of;
D('j)t.. Of l•:AVI' ,111(1 Of the City of Los Angeles
VII I'l,cint i ff Cit y of Tuc•: ;can v. Americal POt-rofitt ;l) No. 70 -933
ct ill.
V111. I'l.li nt- i f f (:011111.)' Of Co: ;t ri V. Standard Oi-1, No. 7J-1526
CL al .
OT11F:R WESTERN T.TQITID ASPIIALT CASES
I. Plaintiff Cascade Construction Company, Inc. v.
Standard Oil, et al.
II. Plaintiff Pioneer Construction Company v. Standard
Oil, et al.
•III. State of Washington, et al. v. Chevron Asphalt,
et al.
Plaintiffs & Intervenors
City of Everett
City of Kennewick
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Port Angeles
City of Puyallup
City of Richl' nd
City of Seattle
Porgy of SeatLle
City of Taccxa
City of Yakima
Lake I.7ashingtcn School Dist.
Northshere School Dist.
Benton County
Chelan County
Franklin County
Grays Harbor County
Grant County
Island County
King County
Kitsap County
Lewis County
Pacific County
San Juan County
Skagit County
County of Skamania
County of Snohomish
Spokane County
Stevens County
Thurston County
Wahkiakuin County
Walla Walla County
State of Washington
IV. Plaintiff Page Paving Company v. Standard Oil,
et al. '
V. Plaintiff Klamath County, Oregon v. Standard
Oil, et al.
VI. City and County of San Francisco v. Union Oil,
et al.
Plaintiffs & Intervenors
City of San Francisco
County of San Francisco
San Francisco Unified School District
VII. The State of Alaska v. Chevron Asphalt, et al.
Plaintiffs & Tntervenor_s
No. 49638
No. 49808
No. C -70 -187
4
No. 50307
No. 51258
No. 51331 R.E.S.
No: C -70 -184
State of Alaska City of Ketchikan
City of Anclioraf;e Fairbanks North Star Borough
City of FaiLuaLil;s
VIII. Plaintiff Sonoma County, California v. Standard No. 51701
oil, ct al.
IX. P1 Zintiff City of San Diego v. 11nion Oil Nos. C -09 -589;
Coiigp any, et al. C -70 -186
X. P1rlinti£f C; ty of Portland, Orc,-,on v. Standard No. C -69 -4
Oil, et al.
{I. State of Ore'Jon v. Standard
I', j., �i Ir:tcr.__:ir�r.;
Citic , oC -'cni 1, Corvalli
L;uUc"O, lii 115i -)oro, Lake
0SWOU0, 'Ier.lford, Salem
EXI
U11, et al. tdo. 50173
Counties of C1al :auras, Clatsop
Gilliam, Jackson, Lane, 'iarion,
`Iorrow, :Iultnoma`z, Pol: :,
Tillanlooi :, Washington
M j'' I T 13
1. j 441;
FINAL RELEASE
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged,
acting by and through its duly authorized undersigned officer,
does hereby release and discharge Edgington Oil Company, and
the present and former officers, directors, employees, agents,
attorneys, subsidiaries, affiliates, and successors of such
Company, from any and all claims and demands of whatever
nature, anticipated or unanticipated, known or unknown, as
indicated below:
1. All claims and demands based in whole or in
part on the facts, or any of them, asserted in the complaint
or other pleadings, records or documents in the case of
r
2. All claims and demands based upon monopoliza-
tion, attempt to monopolize, conspiracy to monopolize, con-
spiracy or combination in restraint of trade, and unfair
competition, in connection with the manufacture, marketing
and sale of liquid asphalt up to and including the date of.
this release.
3. Any and all claims and deriands arising out of,
or by virtue of, any alleged violations of the laws or regula-
tions of the United States Government, or any agency thereof,
or the laws of any of the several states or political divisions
thereof, or any agency thereof, in connection with the manu-
facture, marketing and sale of liquid asphalt up to and
including the date of this release.
- 1 -
I:XHIBIT C
This release is not intended to and does not release
or in any way narrow any claims against any other person or
entity, including any other defendant named in the case cited
above.
Attorney
Executed this day of , 1972.
By
Its Duly Authorized Officer
- 2 -
0
li3;fo
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by
Section 1. That the settlement of the suit filed
on behalf of the [city, county, agency, etc.] against Edgington
Oil Company (case name and number), as set forth in the
Settlement Agreement dated 1972 ", entered into on
behalf of by
its counsel is hereby authorized, approved and ratified.
Section 2. That
be and he is hereby authorized to execute and deliver the
Final Release approved by its counsel (Exhibit C to the
Settlement Agreement) and cause the suit to be dismissed
without prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and'
attorneys" fees.
EXHIBIT D
l _1301
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by
Section 1. That the Settlement Agreement dated
1972, entered into on behalf of the
[city, etc.) by its counsel is hereby authorized, approved
and ratified.
Section 2. That
be and he is hereby authorized to execute and deliver the
Final Release approved by its counsel (Exhibit C to the
Settlement Agreement).
0
M
EXHIBIT E
1_ .1 30')
Appropriate )
Case ) STIPULATION AND ORDER
Heading j OF DISMISSAL
)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs
and intervenors in this action and defendant Edgington Oil
Company, by and through their respective attorneys, that this
action shall be dismissed without prejudice as to defendant
Edgington oil Company. Each such party shall bear its own
costs.
This dismissal is not intended to and does not
dismiss this action, or any part of it, as to any other
defendants.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs an
Intervenors
Attorneys for Defendant
Edgington Oil Company
IT IS SO ORDERED this day of , 1972.
United States District Judge
EXHIBIT F
4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO. )
I, JANE D. HOUGH, City Clerk of the
City of El Segundo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the
whole number of members of the City Council of the said City
is five; that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2450
was duly passed and adopted by the said City Council, approved
and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City
Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of the said Council
held on the 14th day of August i97 2
and that the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen McGill, Morgan, Nagel, Stephens,
and Mayor Balmer;
NOES: Councilmen None
ABSENT: Councilmen None.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City
this 25th day of August , 1972
JANE D. HOUGH
City Clerk of e City of egun o
California
By ZzLr, /'
eputy
(SEAL)