Loading...
CC RESOLUTION 1200RESOLUTION NO. 1200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE GRANTING BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SAID CITY OF THE VARIANCE REFERRED TO IN RESOLU- TION NO. 113 OF SAID COMMISSION, IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CARL W. AND HAZEL L. EATON, UPON AND SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH IN SAID RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, there has been presented to this Council Resolu- tion No. 113 of the City Planning Commission of said City, in words and figures as follows: "RESOLUTION NO. 113 "RESOLVED, that in the matter of the application of Carl W. and Hazel L. Eaton for an adjpstment of yard re- quirements in connection with the contemplated erection of three duplex structures on property located on the east side of Main Street between Oak and Maple Avenues, in the City of E1 Segundo, and described as the north 75 feet of the south 175 feet of Lot 5, Block 94, City of E1 Se- gundo, Map Books 20 -22 -23 of Maps, the Commission finds as follows: "1. Subject property is classified as R -3, which permits occupancy by multiple dwellings. "2. The circumstances pertaining to the required showings as required in Ordinance No. 306 are as follows: "(a) S ecial circumstances do exist to a degree through theSact that subject property is not served by an alley at the rear, thus making the provision of a required garage space a difficult problem unless such facilities are placed on the front portion of the lot, rather than at the rear. "(b) The reservation of a substantial property right. The dimensions o the lot are such that although the contem- plated dwelling units can be located on the premises with full provision for required yard space, the same is not true with reference to the required garage space unless the ad- justment in both yard space and the dimensions of car space be made. - 1 - 6611 "(c) Material Damage. No material damage would result to other property in the same vicinity and zone in that oc- cupancy of subject property does not contemplate exceeding, or even equalling, the number of dwelling units which Ordinance No. 306 automatically permits in the R -3 Zone, while the garage facilities, although located on the front portion of the property, will make full provision for the required front yard space. "(d) Comprehensive General Plan. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive general plan in that the proposed variance, if granted, would in no way alter the street lines as contemplated by the Master Plan of Streets and it will conform fully to the requirements of the Official Plan of Land -use as defined by Ordinance No. 306, except for such adjustment in lot arrangement and dimensions as are stipulated herein. "THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the said appli- cation for a variance be recommended for approval on the follow- ing conditions: "l. That the garage units be designed and constructed integrally as a part of the main buildings, thus gaining the five feet originally contemplated as a separation between the garage and the closest buildings in each case, and that this gained space of five feet be added to the proposed five (5) feet at the rear of the rear -most building so as to provide a rear yard of ten feet. "2. That each of the two three -car garage units be per- mitted a width of 26 feet in place of 30 feet, in order to maintain the maximum possible distance between such garages, which distance will be used for entrance onto the premises. 9. That notwithstanding that one dwelling unit in each of the foremost duplexes will be required to provide its rear entrance on to the side yard, said entrance being limited to the foremost dwelling unit in each such building, the require- ment of Ordinance No. 306 for one additional foot of side yard width for each entrance onto such side yard be waived, and the standard side yard width of five (5) feet be maintained, as it applies to the entire main building, which includes the garage, and "FINALLY RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be trans- mitted to the City Council for its attention in the manner pre- scribed by law. " /s/ George E. Binder Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo, California " /s/ L. A. Allen Chairman of the City Plann ng Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, California - 2 - 6612 "STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) "I, George E. Binder, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a full, true and correct copy of a Resolution of the City Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, California, adopted at a Regular Meeting of the said Commission duly held on the 26th day of November, 1951; "That the whole number of members of said Commission is five and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote: "Ayes: Binder, Frederick, Thompson and Chairman Allen; "Noes: None; "Absent : Hanson. "IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of December, 1951. " /s/ George E. Binder Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, California " WHEREAS, this City Council has carefully considered the said Resolution No. 113 and all of the matters therein referred to and feels that the action hereinafter taken is in the interest of said City and of the public thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUN- DO, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That said City Council does hereby approve, ratify and confirm the action taken by said City Planning Commission in its said Resolution No. 113, and does hereby approve, authorize and grant the variance referred to and described in said Resolution No. 113 of said Commission upon, and subject to, each and all of the conditions set forth in said hereinabove quoted resolution. SECTION 2. That the original of said Resolution No. 113, which is now on file in the office of the Secretary of the City Planning Commission of said City and open to public inspection, is hereby referred to and by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. - 3 - mediately. 6613 SECTION 3. That this resolution shall take effect im- SECTION 4. That nothing in this resolution contained shall be construed as constituting a precedent, as the City Council is adopting this resolution under the special and peculiar circum- stances which obtain in this particular case, only. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. Passed, approved and adopted this 5th day of December, 1951. ATTEST: r City Clerk (SEAL) Mayor of the City of B1 begun California - 4 - 6614 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, SS. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO. ) I. Neva M. Elsey, City Clerk of the City of E1 Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the said City is five; that the foregoing reso- lution, being Resolution No. 1200, was passed and adopted by the said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of the said Council held on the 5th day of December, 1951, and that the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Gordon, Peterson, Swanson, Thompson and Mayor Selby; NOES: Councilmen None; ABSENT: Councilmen None. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 5th day of December, 1951. (SEAL) - 4 - City Clerk of the City of E1 Segundo, Californg.