Loading...
CC RESOLUTION 1124C224 RESOLUTION NO. 1124 A RESOLUTION OF 'iHF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, C=FOPNIA: (A) SUS- TAINING THE APPEAL OF EDI'TIN H. GIBB AND OTHERS FROP,' THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COPWISSION OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION NO. 87 OF SAID CO1MI-_1SIO1� ADOPTED ON THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1950; (B) OVERRULING THE DECISION AND RECO11- ENDATIONS OF SAID PLANNING COISTISSION SET FORTH IN ITS SAID RESOLUTION NO. 87; AND (C) DENYING THE VARIANCE APPLIED FOR BY EDITIN W. PAULEY AND HAROLD R. PAULEY REFERRED TO IN SAID PLANNING COMIISSION RESOLUTION NO. 87. WHEREAS, after proceedings duly and regularly had, as required by law, the City Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, California, did at a meeting of said Commission duly and regularly held on the 13th day of November, 1950, adopt its Resolution No. 87, of which the following is a full, true and correct copy, to wit: "RESOLUTION NO. 87 "RESOLVED, that in the matter of the application of Edwin `N. Pauley and Harold R. Pauley for the granting of a variance to permit the drilling of a well for recovery of oil or other hydrocarbon substances within the incor- porated limits of the City of E1 Segundo, California, and described as follows: 'Generally, portions of Lot 9, Block 12, Tract 1685 and land lying westerly of wester- ly boundaries of Lot 9, Block 12, Tract 1685, Lots 6 and 7, Block 11, Tract 1685, along with land in and adjacent westerly of Blocks 4 and 7 of said tract.' - 1 - 19 cc2z4l that the City Planning Commission finds as follows: "1. That Ordinance No. 306 and Ordinance No. 312 in combination specify required procedures and circumstances to be considered in evaluating and determining projects. "2. That the required public hearing has been held on October 30, 1950. 113. That the property on which the proposed well is to be drilled is classified as an R -1 zone under Ordinance Yo. 306 and therefore would be considered an urbanized area as defined in Ordinance No. 312. 114. That there are peculiar and unusual circumstances connected with the request in that the applicants seek per- mission to slant -drill a well from a surface site located in the incorporated limits of the City of E1 Segundo, to be bottomed under land in the City of Los Angeles and upon which the Hyperion Treatment Plant is located. Applicants present- ly hold leases on subsurface mineral rights under the City of Los Angeles property. Because of the magnitude of the Hyperion Treatment ?lant, no drill sites are available, and therefore, the applicant requests permission to drill one well to 'drill for and produce petroleum and gas and other hydrocarbon substances', and does not request the establish- ment of an oil drilling district as same is set forth in Ordinance No. 312. "5. That the planned location of Ocean Parkway, a unit in the Master Plan of Streets and Highways for the City of El Segundo is adjacent to subject property and will serve to separate the westerly extremity of the City from the main urbanly developed area of the City of El Segundo. 116. That the location of an existing and operating well known as Loftus No. 1 and located as follows: - 2 - 62'16 "Westerly of and immediately adjoining Lot 9, Block 12, Tract 1685, as Der Map recorded in Book 21, page 98 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County; and the location more particularly described as being One Hundred (100) feet westerly and One Hundred Thirty -five (135) feet northerly of the southeast corner of said Lot 91 in the immediate vicinity of subject property established the fact that oil has been proven to exist within the area and that as a consequence, constitutional guarantees to property established the propriety of allowing further exploratory drilling under the controlled provisions of Ordinance No. 312 for the purpose of more definitely determining the extent and productivity of the field. 117. That it is to the interest of the City of T1 Segundo and the property within it, to substitute certainty for uncertainty and to enjoy the material advantages of re- covering oil if further explorations establish that it exists in practical quantities. 118. That the provisions of Ordinance No. 306 and Ordinance No. 312 have been devised and adopted purposely to reconcile and protect property under circumstances as have been shown to exist under these proceedings. "RESOLVED, that the City 'Planning Commission recommends the granting of the variance, as provided by Section 13 of Or- dinance No. 306, provided such variance be subject to the follow- ing specified conditions: "l. That the well be located approximately One Hun- dred (100) feet south of the existing well which is located as above described. "`. 'hat the well be slant or off -set drilled, to bottom under the Hyperion Treatment Plant located in the City of Los Angeles. - 3 - C21111"41 "3. That in accordance w-th a statement made by the applicants of their willingness to remove the derrick at the existing well, known as Loftus Yo. 1 and in the vicinity of the proposed drilling site, the Commission does herein re- quest that said derrick be removed. ' *4. That no additional wells bottomed outside of this City will be permitted until an oil drilling district has been established as outlined in Ordinance No. 312 (or such other ordinance of said City supplanting or superceding Ordinance No. 312), and a well bottoming under said dis- trict has been completed. "5. For the information of all concerned, the Com- mission presently has in mind possible future drilling dis- tricts in said general area as follows: ' IDISTRICT NO. 1: That area bounded on the north by Imperial TTighway, on the east by Hillcrest Street, on the south by Sycamore Avenue, and on the west by the westerly City Limits of the City of E1 Segundo and comprised of 29.875 acres. "DISTRICT NO. 2: That area bounded on the north by Sycamore Avenue, on the east by Hillcrest Street, on the south by Palm Avenue, and on the west by the westerly City Limits of the City of E1 Segundo and comprised of 20.607 acres. "DISTRICT NO. 3: That area bounded on the north by Palm Avenue, on the east by Hillcrest Street, on the south by Holly Avenue, and on the west by the westerly City Limits of the City of El Segundo, and comprised of 27.779 acres. 116. That after the well under consideration at this time shall have been drilled, further drilling from the Con- trolled Drilling Site established by this Variance shall alternately bottom a well under property located within the limits of the suggested Districts 1, 2 or 3 defined herein, provided this condition shall not apply if wells bottomed within the City of E1 Segundo indicate by their logs that boundaries of the productive oil structures have been reached. - 4 - C23r,_,�, It is the declared intention of this provision to assure that the City of E1 Segundo and property lying within it shall not be deprived of its just enjoyment of such oil as may underlie it by reason of having it drained by wells bottoming elsewhere. "7. That the applicant shall post with the City of E1 Segundo, a satisfactory corporate surety bond in the sum of $5,000.00 in favor of the City of E1 Segundo conditioned upon the performance by the applicant of each and all of the conditions, provisions, restrictions and requirements stated as a condition of this variance. '8. That the following conditions be imposed as set forth in Ordinance No. 312, entitled 'AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR TI-77 ESTABLISH ENT OF OIL DRILLING DISTRICTS "`ITHIN THE URBILTIZED AREAS OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS FOR THE CREATION THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROL THEREIT_'. OF THE DRILLING FOR OIL OR OTHER HYDROCARBON PRODUCTS; AND PROVIDING FOR SUPERVISION OF RELATED PRACTICES,' SECTION 3: Paragraph E. Optional Conditions: 11(1) That drilling operations shall be commenced within ninety (90) days from the effective date of the variance or within such additional period as the City Planning Commission and the City Council may, for good cause, allow and thereafter shall be prosecuted dili- gently to completion, or else abandoned strictly as required by law and the premises restored to their original condition as nearly as practicable so to do. If a producing well is not secured within twelve (12) months said well shall be abandoned and the premises restored to its original condition as nearly as prac- ticable so to do. The City Planning Commission and the City Council shall, for good cause, allow additional time for the completion of the well. "(2) That an internal combustion engine or steam driven equipment may be used in the drilling of the well and, if an internal combustion engine or steam driven equipment is used, that mufflers be installed on the mud pumps and engines. 11(3) That pumping and other power operations, (other than drilling) shall at all times be carried on only by electrical power and that such power shall not be gener- ated on the controlled drilling site or in the district. - 5 - 2gyp. I t 11(4) That drilling operations shall be carried on or conducted in connection with only one well at a time in any one such district, and such well shall be brought in or abandoned before operations for the drilling of another well are commenced; provided, however, that the City Planning Commission and the City Council may permit the drilling of more than one well at a time after the discov- ery well has been brought in. 11(5) That all oil drilling and production operations shall be conducted in such a manner as to eliminate, as far as practicable, dust, noise, vibration or noxious odors and shall be in accordance with the best accepted practices incident to drilling for and the production of oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances. Proven tech- nological improvements in drilling and production methods shall be adopted as they may become, from time to time, available, if capable of reducing factors of nuisance and annoyance. 11(6) That all tools, pipe and other equipment used in connection with any production operations, when con- ducted under the provisions of Section 3, paragraph B, subparagraph (2) part (a) hereof, shall be screened from view. I'M That no materials, equipment, tools, or pipe used for either drilling or production operations shall be delivered to or removed from the controlled drilling site except between the hours of 8.00 o'clock A. M. and 6;00 o'clock P. M. on any day, except in case of emer- gency incident to unforeseen drilling or production operations. "(8) Fire extinguishers as approved by the Fire De- partment, and of sufficient number as required by the Fire Department, shall be maintained on the premises at all times during the drilling and production operations. "(9) That within sixty (61 days after the drilling of each well has been completed, and said well placed on production, the derrick, all boilers and all other drilling equipment shall be entirely removed from the premises unless such derrick and appurtenant equipment is to be used within a reasonable time limit determined by the City Planning Commission and the City Council for the drilling of another well on the same controlled drilling site. "(10) Need not apply at the present time but may be invoked at some future date at the discretion of the City Planning Commission and the City Council. "(11) Need not apply at the present time but may be invoked at some future date at the discretion of the City Planning Commission and the City Council. 11(12) That no additional tanks shall be constructed on this area. 62 ti (r "(16) That no sign shall be constructed, erected, maintained or placed on the premises or any part thereof, except those required by law or ordinance to be displayed in connection with the drilling or maintenance of the well. 11(17) That suitable and adequate sanitary toilet and washing facilities shall be installed and maintained in a clean and sanitary condition at all times. "(18) Need not apply at the present time but may be invoked at some future date at the discretion of the City -Planning Commission and the City Council. 11(19) That the holder of the variance, his successors and assigns, must at all times be insured to the extent of X100,000.00 against liability in tort arising from drilling, or production, or activities or operations incident thereto, conducted or carried on under the vari- ance or by virtue thereof. The policy of insurance, which may include self- insurance, issued pursuant there- to shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and duplicates shall be furnished to him. Each such policy shall be conditioned or endorsed to cover such agents, lessees or representatives of the variance hold- er as may actually conduct drilling, production or inci- dental, operations permitted by the variance. AND FINALLY RESCL=, that a copy of this Resolution be forwarded to the City Council for its consideration and action in the manner prescribed by law. " IsZ George E. Binder Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, California 1W William G. Thompson Chairman, Pro Tem, of the City Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, California "STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGTJNDO ) "I, George E. Binder, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a full, true and cor- rect copy of a Resolution of the City Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, California, adopted at a Special Meet- ing of the said Commission duly held on the 13th day of Novem- ber, 1950; "That the whole number of members of said Commission is five anc that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote: "Ayes: Commissioners Binder, Frederick, Hanson and Chairman, Pro Tem, Thompson; "Noes: None; "Absent: Chairman Allen. "IN WITNESS 1','HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of November, 1950. - 7 - l� n /s/ George E Binder Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo, California *}• and I%RE.' ,o, said Resolution yo. 87 was thereafter duly and regularly certified to the City Council of said City, and was duly presented to said Council by the City Clerk of said City at the regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of Yovember, 1950; and HEP ,EAS, after the said Resolution No. 87 of said Com- mission had been so duly and regularly presented to and received by said City Council, an appeal, in writing, by Edwin H. Gibb (who is also known and sometimes referred to as "Edwin H. Gibbs ") and others was duly and regularly filed with said Council said appellants , in which , Edwin H. Gibb and others, duly and regularly ap- pealed from the findings, decision and recommendations of said City lanning Commission, as set forth in its said Resolution No. 87, hereinabove quoted; and -'HE '117,T<S, upon receipt of said written appeal of said ao- pellants, said City Council did duly and regularly, by resolution duly adopted and spread upon its records, set the matter of the said appeal of said Edwin H. Gibb and others for public hearing before said City Council in the Council Chamber Ln the City Hall of said City located at 203 Richmond Street, El Segundo, California, beginning at the hour of 7:00 o }clock p.m, on Wednesday, the 20th day of December, 1950, and did authorize and instruct the City Clerk of said City to give notice of such public hearing in time, form ,nd manner as required by law, and to employ a court reporter to report the said hearing; and ,LERFsS, upon the filing of said appeal and of the fixing of the time and place of said hearing, the City Clerk did duly and regularly notify the secretary of the Planning Commission of said City of the filing of such appeal and the fixing of such hearing date and place; and - 8 - G14 WHEREAS, on the receipt of such notice, the Secretary of said Planning Commission did duly, regularly and immediately transfer to the City Council the complete file of the said case; and VEREAS, thereafter, the said City Clerk did duly and regularly give notice of the time, place and purpose of the said public hearing, as required by law, and did also employ David Ettleson, an official Reporter of the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles, to report said hearing; and VMREAS, on said 20th day of December, 1950, begin- ning at the hour of 7 :00 o'clock p.m, on said day, in said Council Chamber of the City Hall of said City, said City Coun- cil did duly and regularly call said matter of said appeal for public hearing; and EEREAS, it appeared that there were more persons in attendance at said hearing than could be reasonably accommodated in said Council Chamber of said City Hall; and WHEREAS, for the purposes of conducting said hearing, said City Council did at said last mentioned time and place duly and regularly adjourn said meeting and said hearing to the Auditorium on the second floor in the said City Hall Building of said City and did duly and regularly notify all persons pre- sent to inonediately adjourn to the upstairs auditorium and did make due and adequate provisions for the notification of all late - comers of the fact that such hearing was being conducted in such upstairs auditorium of said City Hall Building; and SHEREAS, at said last mentioned place to wit: in said upstairs auditorium of said City Hall Building, and im- mediately following the short recess required in order to per- mit the Council and the members of the public to reach and be seated in said upstairs auditorium, said City Council did duly 62110 and regularly conduct the said public hearing and did, at the conclu- sion thereof, duly anC re,ularly take said appeal, and the subjects and matters relating thereto, under advisement for decision by said Council, until the regular meeting of said Council to be held on PTednesday, the 10th day of January, 1951, beginning at the hour of 7 :00 o'clock p.m. of said day, in the Council Chamber in the City Hall of said City; and YHEREaS, on said 10th day of January, 1951, said City Council did take said appeal, and the subjects and matters relating thereto, under further advisement for decision until the regular meeting of said Council to be held beginning at the hour of 7 :00 o'clock p.m. on Wednesday, January 17, 1951; and '17i71EREAS, on said 17th day of January, 1951, said City Coun- cil did announce, by resolution, its desire to deny said application and did instruct the City Attorney to prepare and present to said Council for its consideration at its next regular meeting (January 24, 1951) the necessary formal proceeding or proceedings so to do; and V)HEREAS, said City Attorney did, as instructed by said Coun- oil, present to said Council, at its regular meeting of January 24, 1951, a form of resolution: (a) Sustaining the said appeal of said Edwin H. Gibbs and others from the decision of the City Planning Commission of said City, set forth in its said Resolution No. 87; (b) Overruling the decision and recommendations of said Planninu Commission set forth in its said Resolution No. 87; and (c) Denying the variance applied for by said applicants, Edwin :. Pauley and Harold R. Pauley referred to in said Manning Commission Resolution No. 87; and d,iiERE,�S, at said meeting of January 24, 1951, said applicants, through their attorney Delbert A. Thomas, presented a motion to said Council to reopen for further public hearing before said Council the said matter involving the said application, the said appeal, the said findings and recommendations of said Planning Commission and the an- nounced desire of said Council to deny said application; and said Council did thereupon take said formal resolution and said motion to reopen said matter under advisement until its regular meeting to be held on the 7th day of February, 1951, beginning at the hour of 7 :00 o'clock p.m. of said day; and - 10 - WHEREAS, at its said meeting of February 7th, 1951, said applicants, through their said attorney, did withdraw their said motion and the City Council, upon the request of said applicants, through their said Attorney, did permit said applicants to withdraw their said motion; and WHEREAS, each and all of the members of said Council has and have now had full opportunity to consider and analyze the said appeal and the application for variance referred to in said Resolu- tion No. 87 of said Commission; the recommendations of said Commis- sion; and all of the testimony and evidence, both oral and documen- tary, submitted at said public hearing before said Council, and to review and consider the complete files, data and instruments, in- cluding the summaries of testimony offered at the public hearing held before said City Planning Commission with reference to the sub- jects and matters referred to in said Resolution No. 87 of said Commission; and WHEREAS, the members of said Council are also familiar with the general comprehensive land use plan of said City and its develop- ment; and WHEREAS, said Council is now in a position to render its final decision in the premises; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, FIND DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the said application for zone variance, hereinabove referred to in the preamble to this resolution, was prop- erly made to the Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo,under the provisions of Part "II" of Section 13 of Ordinance No. 306 (the Land Use Plan - Zoning Ordinance) of said City, adopted on the 22nd day of January, 1947, as amended, and that the appeal of the said ap- pellants to the said City Council from the decision, findings and re- commendations of the said City Planning Commission of said City, was properly made under the provisions of said Ordinance. SECTION 2. That the applicants herein were, and are, Edwin W. Pauley and Harold R. Pauley. SECTION 3. That the variance here involved, (referred to in Planning Commission Resolution No. 87 above) is a variance to - 11 - C21;J- use the following described real property, located in the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, to wit; Generally, portions of Lot 9, Block, 12, Tract 1685 and land lying westerly of westerly boundaries of Lot 9, Block 12, Tract 1665, Lots 6 and 7, Block 11, Tract 1685, along with land in and adjacent westerly of Blocks 4 and 7 of said tract, for the purposes of locating and drilling a well thereon for the recovery of oil or other hydrocarbon substances. Said above de- scribed real property will be hereinafter referred to as the "Sub- ject Property ". SE'CTIGY 4. That the subject lands above referred to and here involved, and to which the variance applied for is requested to apply, are presently cla3sified as in district or zone R -1, as established under the provisions of said Zoning Ordinance No. 306, of said City, as amended. SECTION 5. Said City Council does hereby find that there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the subject property or to the intended use of said subject property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use In the same vicinity or zone in which the subject property is located. SECTION 6. Said Council does hereby further find that said variance applied for is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the said applicant, possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone. SECTION 7. Said Council does hereby further find that the granting of the said variance applied for would be materially detrimental to the public welfare and injurious to the property and improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the said subject property is located. SECTIOY 8. Said Council does hereby further find that the granting of said variance applied for would adversely affect the - 12 - 6246k�, comprehensive ,-,ener�,l of s -i" City. SECTIOY 9. In connection with the foreco,ng finrlincfs, said City Council .makes the following further observations, determina- tions and findings with re.arence to the said variance aprlied for and the proposed use of said subject property for the purposes of locating anv drilling a well thereon for the recovery of oil and othei hydrocarbon substances, to wit: (a) The slant drilling of the proposed well on the sub- ject property to a bottom located outside of the said City of El Segundo and under the City of Los 'ngeles yperion Sewer Project property would not assure the owners of real properties located in the City of E1 Segundo that there is oil or other hydrocarbon substances under their respective prop- erties; (b) The equity of oil explorations is off -set by the equity of depreciation of surrounding properties owned and occupied by home owners in the City of El Segundo; (c) The said Council does not fe -1 that it should at this time establish the precedent of grunting a zone variance for the production cf oil or other hydrocar- bon substances from an area located outside the boun- daries of the City of =1 Segundo fror2 a derrick and drill site located within said City; (d) Said Council has considered and analyzed the signa- tures appearing on applicants' "Exhibit No. 6" of property owners owning and of persons residing on properties within a 2,000 foot radius of the subject property and from such consideration and analysis has substantially determined that of the 284 signatures appended to applicants' said "Exhibit No. 6" (being a petition favorinr) the granting of tle requested - 13 - 624%" Y variance), b reside iavithin a 1,000 foot radius from such subject property, 19 reside within a 2,000 foot radius and 260 reside outside of the said 2,000 foot radius. Three (3) letters and one (1) teleLram in favor of the proposed variance were also received from property owners within a radius of 1,000 feet of the subject property. On the other hand, the Council finds tha-c of the 196 signatories who signed opponents' "Exhibit _Co. 1t, (opposing granting of said variance), none of such signatories reside within a 1,000 foot radius from said subject property; 104 of such signatories reside within a 2,000 foot radius and 92 of said signatories reside outside of said 2,000 foot radius. One (1) letter opposing granting of said variance was also received from a property owner within said 2,000 foot radius. This analysis and_ consideration clearly indicates to the Council that the majority of persons interested as owners of, or as residents on, the property within said 2,000 foot radius were opr,osed to the granting of the va- riance applied for. (e) ?'y refusing to grant the said variance applied for, the City Council is not depriving any property owner, owning propertiy within the City of 711 Segundo, of the right to exploit his or her property lying within said City of .Il aegundo, as the well proposed to be located and drilled under the variance applied for is, according to the application and evidence produced at the hearings, to be bottomed outside of the City of E1 Segundo. (f) The City Council has taken into due and careful con- sideration the applicants' evidence and arguments submitted purporting to show: - 14 - 6248 (1) That applicants should have the right to exploit their own property or properties over which they have possession in this particular area; (2) That the drilling site will be located west of the proposed freeway on property asserted to be unsuitable for residential purposes; (3) That modern methods of screening and _oroduc- tion assertedly eliminate much of the noise and unsightliness of equipment, appliances, appurtenances and structures necessarily used and employed in drilling for oil and other hydrocarbon substances; (4) The further assertion that the granting of said variance might settle once and for all whether there is or is not oil in the subject property area; and (5) The asserted reasonableness anj propriety of the variance for which said applicants have applied; but after such jue and careful consideration, the said Council can not agree with the assertions and conten- tions of the applicants to the extent necessary to jus- tify the granting of the variance applied for. (g) The said Council has L,aken into due and careful consider- ation all of the opponents` evidence and arguments sub- mitted, purporting to show reasons why the variance applied for should not be granted and after such due and careful consideration, the City Council feels, finds and so deter - m,nes that the evidence and reasons submitted by the oo- ponents are sufficient to justify and require said Council to deny said variance so applied for. - 15 - SECTION 10. That said City Council, in view of the fore- going findings and determinations, does hereby sustain the said appeal of said Edwin H. Gibbs and others and does Hereby according- ly overrule the findings, determinations and recommendations of the City Planning Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, California, as set forth in said Resolution No. 87 of said City Planning Commission. SECTION 11. That said City Council does hereby deny the said variance applied for by said Edwin ';J. Pauley and Harold R. Pauley and does hereby refuse to grant or issue the same. SECTII-N 12. That this resolution shall take effect im- mediately. SECTION 13. That the City Clerk shall certify to the pas- sage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said City; shall make a minute of a the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same was passed and adopted; and shall forward a certified copy thereof to each of the following: Said applicants, Edwin `,,I. said Pauley and Harold R. Pauley; /Appellant, -dwin II. Gibbs; and the City Planning Commission of said City. Passed, approved and adopted this 7th day of February, 1951. ATTEST: VICTO D. McC. =14Y City Clerk of the City of El ` Degundo, California. �ia By _ ll� row CnX'a Deputy City Clerk ( = T ��- /i I,ayor of the City of El S do, California. - 16 - 621-1) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) } COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS. CITY OF EL SEG t4DO ) I, Victor D. McCarthy, City Clerk of the City of E1 Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the said City is five; that the foregoing resolution, being Resolution No. 1124 , was passed and adopted by the said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of the said Council held on the 7th day of February, 1951, and that the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Gordon, Peterson, Swanson, Thompson and Favor Selby- NOES: Councilmen None: ABSENT: Councilmen None. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 7th day of February , 1951. VICTOR D. MCCARTHY City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California. Deputy City Clerk (SEAL)