1983 JUL 05 CC MINX59,;
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
July 5, 1983
I CALL TO ORDER
The E1 Segundo City Council convened in regular session on Tuesday,
July 5, 1983 at 7 :00 o'clock p.m. in the Council Chamber of the
E1 Segundo City Hall.
II PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Mrs. Valerie Burrowes, the City Clerk.
III INVOCATION was delivered by Mr. Gordon Stephens.
IV ROLL CALL
Present: Council Members Armstrong, Johnson, Siadek,
Synadinos and Mayor Bue
Absent: Council Members None
V SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing on Precise Plan No. 83 -1 for Property
Located at 325 -333 Richmond Street
The Mayor announced that this was the time and place heretofore
fixed for the public hearing on Precise Plan No. 83 -1 for property
located at 325 -333 Richmond Street, and asked whether proper
notice of the hearing had been given. The City Clerk replied
that an affidavit of publication is on file. The Mayor then
inquired if any written communications had been received, to which
the City Clerk replied that none had been received in her office.
Mr. Nicholas Romaniello, Director of Planning, reported that the
Planning Commission had received an application from G. Hanson and
J. Buckingham to redevelop, add to and modify a commercial and
residential site at 325 -333 Richmond Street in the C -RS Zone.
Because a precise plan can be considered only if it is determined
that the proposed development will result in a structure that is
consistent with the purposes of the C -RS moratorium (Ordinance
No. 1039, Section 41)), the Planning Commission undertook a review
of the proposed development. Following its review, the Planning
Commission recommended that the Council certify Negative Declara-
tion EA -010 and approve Precise Plan 83 -1, subject to satisfaction
of 10 conditions outlined in Mr. Romaniello's June 28, 1983 memo-
randum to the Mayor and members of the Council; the plan has now
been revised and meets all requirements of the Planning Commission.
The Mayor asked whether anyone present wished to speak on this
matter.
Mrs. Elizabeth Soror, 820 Manhattan Beach Boulevard, Manhattan
Beach, spoke on behalf of the developers in favor of the proposed
plan.
IT WAS THEN MOVED AND SECONDED that the public
hearing be closed.
Question was raised by Councilwoman Synadinos as to whether tandem
parking is permitted in this zone. It was clarified that the pro-
posed plan had been changed and now includes no provision for tandem
parking. Following this clarification,
THE MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING PASSED
X ,5 958
City Attorney Leland Dolley then read the title of the proposed
ordinance which would implement the recommendations of the Planning
Commission:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT AND ADOPTING PRECISE PLAN NO. 83 -1 FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 325 -333 RICHMOND STREET WITHIN SAID CITY.
This ordinance was then officially introduced by Councilman Johnson.
B. Presentation of the Economic Base Study Report by Economic
Research Associates
City Manager Art Jones briefly introduced the presentation of
the Economic Base Study Report by Economic Research Associates'
Vice President David Wilcox. Mr. Wilcox began by outlining five
tasks set for the study:
1. To prepare an overall assessment of the City's
current and future economic status, including
demographics, income, employment, current revenue
bases, and other descriptive information. This
is especially important since the last such assess-
ment was performed over a decade ago;
2. To forecast the demand for continued develop-
ment of vacant lands for commercial and indus-
trial purposes;
3. To conduct a survey of residents' attitudes
regarding the quality of City services and
opinions relative to different potential
revenue sources which may be pursued;
4. To examine realistic opportunities for enhancing
the City's current revenue sources; and
5. To define the fiscal impacts as to costs and
revenues which the City experiences for ser-
vicing the several types of land uses within
the community.
Mr. Wilcox then summarized the methods which were used by Economic
Research Associates in the development of its report. Next, Mr.
Wilcox summarized the following recommendations from the Economic
Base Study, focusing on proposals for revenue enhancement:
1. Imposition of a selective utility user tax
for those utility services not now providing
revenues to the City's general fund through
the franchise tax;
2. Increasing the property tax to cover the City's
annual costs of contributions to the California
Public Employee's Retirement System;
3. Increasing business registration fees;
4. Increasing revenues from residential areas; and
5. Examining the feasibility of creating an improve-
ments assessment district for a large area of the
City in which the required public improvements
will directly benefit the affected properties.
-2-
Council Minutes
July 5, 1983
X591713
Mr. Wilcox stated that Economic Research Associates is recommending
that three revenue sources be increased and that one new source be
added:
1. Retain the base business registration fee at
a minimum of $50 per business, and impose a
$30 per employee fee in addition to those
firms which have very high volumes of daytime
employees. Charge other commercial land uses
on a per- square- foot -of- building - floor -area
basis of $0.15.
2. Raise the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 7 %.
3. Increase revenue from residential properties
through the imposition of a trash collection
fee. Based upon a new contract fee of $310,000,
the cost per dwelling would amount to approxi-
mately $49 per year.
4. Over the long term, Economic Research Associates
has recommended the possibility of a utility
users' tax. A 1% tax on municipal water would
generate approximately $36,000 per year in
revenue. The City may also wish to examine
the possibility of instituting a utility users'
tax on telephone usage; the potential here
would be several hundred thousand dollars per
year. Economic Research Associates is not
recommending any tax on natural gas or on Southern
California Edison's services to the City.
Mr. Wilcox explained that in developing these recommendations,
Economic Research Associates focused primarily upon the City's
general fund and operating budget. He then described the rationale
for his firm's revised recommendation of a $30.00 per employee
annual fee - -down from their original figure of $45.00 - -to cover
unmet costs of providing the operating service needs of industrial/
aerospace /research and development firms. Approximately 38% of
the general fund budgetary items are related to residential land
uses, and the other 62% are connected with industrial uses. An
estimate was then made of the annual cost to the City of the
Chevron refinery, which turned out to be approximately $1,000,000.
The original estimate of $45.00 per employee was based on not being
able to calculate the cost to the City of the operation of the
Chevron plant. Once the estimate of approximately $1,000,000 was
made the necessary per employee business charge fell to $30. This
$30 annual fee needs to be seen as a per capita difference between
income generated for the City and costs associated with industrial
operation which must be borne by the City.
In response to a question from Councilman Johnson, Mr. Wilcox
confirmed that Economic Research Associates' estimates do not take
capital improvements into account, only general fund expenditures.
Some additional questions were raised with regard to the method of
derivation of the modified $30 per employee business registration
fee, to which Mr. Wilcox provided responses.
Councilman Johnson raised a question regarding the proposed method
of charging business registration fees to low- density employers,
such as Allied Chemical. Mr. Wilcox stated that the report
envisioned their being charged the regular $30 per employee fee.
-3- Council Minutes
July 5, 1983
X ;9 �tl
He did note that there could be a per barrel charge imposed on a
given industry's commodities- -but for that approach a separate
rationale would have to be developed. Following this, there were
some additional questions and discussion regarding the feasibility
and advisability of imposing a gross receipts tax.
During discussion of the per- square- foot - charge, it was suggested
by Councilwoman Synadinos that this type of charge places a dis-
proportionately heavy burden on smaller businesses.
In response to a question concerning whether implementation of the
recommendations contained in Economic Research Associates' Execu-
tive Summary would produce a balanced operating budget, Mr. Wilcox
explained that this would depend upon their rate of implementation.
Continued drawing down of municipal reserves will make this objective
more difficult to achieve.
C. Presentation of the Economic Advisory Committee Recommendations
for Increases in Business Registration Fees and Transient Occu-
pancy Taxes and for Scheduling of a Public Hearing
The recommendations of the City's Economic Advisory Committee were
presented by Mr. Pat Smith, the group's Chairman. Mr. Smith referred
Council members to the Committee's July 5, 1983 set of recommenda-
tions, and then reviewed each of these.
1. The Committee recommends a business license fee for
manufacturing and wholesale businesses as follows:
$50 basic fee per company plus a $20 per capita tax
for each employee in excess of ten and $10 for each
additional location.
2. The Committee recommends that retail business licenses
be the same as manufacturing.
3. The Committee recommends the professional services
fee (as defined in Section 5.08.570 of the E1 Segundo
Municipal Code) be established at the $50 base, $20
per employee ($10 for each additional location) with
no exemptions.
The $20 per employee fee is applied to the number
of employees in excess of ten.
4. The per capita tax shall be reduced proportionately
whenever the amount of sales tax revenue received
in the immediately preceding fiscal year exceeds 80%
of the 1979 -80 fiscal year level, with the Gann
limit factored into the revenue base.
5. The Committee recommends that other commercial land
uses (e.g., warehouses) which are not employee -
intensive be charged $0.10 per square foot (enclosed
space) in addition to the base business registration
fee of $50 per business.
6. A schedule of other business license fees and permits
recommended by the Committee is attached to its
report as Exhibit "C ". This schedule includes, as
a new revenue source, a delivery truck fee of $36
per year, with holders of local business licenses
exempt. Vending machine licenses were changed to
a $50 base plus $0.80 per $1000 of gross.
-4-
Council Minutes
July 5, 1983
x5961
7. The Committee recommends that the transient occupancy
tax be increased by 1 %.
8. The Committee recommends that auditing procedures
(across the board) be enhanced.
9. The Committee recommends an in -depth review of the
business license fees by City Council every two
years.
10. The Committee recommends that business license fees
be applied to contract employees, and that the method
be determined administratively.
11. The Committee recommends that the current penalty
for late payment of business license fees be con-
tinued.
On behalf of the residents and the members of the Council, the
Mayor expressed his appreciation for the Committee's efforts.
Discussion followed regarding the schedule for additional review
of and deliberation on these recommendations. The Mayor asked
if August 2 would be the earliest possible date on which a public
hearing could be held; the City Manager confirmed that this was
the case. There was some difference of opinion about what
material should be presented prior to the public hearing: the
recommendations of the consultants, the recommendations of the
City's Economic and Revenue Advisory Committee, both sets of
recommendations, or only a statement of the issues being discussed
without any specific dollar amounts.
Following additional discussion,
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILMAN SIADEK AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN
JOHNSON that the public hearing be set for August 2, 1983,
and that the material to be presented to the public in advance
of the hearing consist of the July 5, 1983 recommendations of
the Economic and Revenue Advisory Committee.
Councilman Armstrong asked the maker of the above motion whether
he would be willing to accept an amendment which would provide
for presentation to the public of both the recommendations of
the City's Economic and Revenue Advisory Committee and the recommen-
dations of the consultant firm, Economic Research Associates.
Councilman Siadek declined, the motion was put to a vote,
AND THE MOTION PASSED as indicated below:
Ayes: Council Members Johnson, Siadek and Mayor Bue
Noes: Council Members Armstrong and Synadinos
Absent: Council Members None
At 8 :50 p.m., the Mayor declared a five minute recess. At 8 :55
p.m., the Council meeting was reconvened with all members present.
Prior to presentation of the Sepulveda Boulevard Plan Line Study,
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILMAN ARMSTRONG AND SECONDED BY
COUNCILWOMAN SYNADINOS that the motion adopted at the
June 21, 1983 regular meeting of the Council regarding
the budget for the 1983 -84 fiscal year be reconsidered.
-5- Council Minutes
July 5, 1983
X5962
Some question was raised as to whether the capital improvements
budget and the operating budget were approved together in one
motion at the June 21 meeting, or whether they were approved in
separate actions; because of the relevance of this question for
the motion just put forward (the maker of the motion was con-
cerned only with the capital improvements budget), the City
Clerk and the City Attorney agreed to obtain clarification
while the next presentation was ongoing. In order to expedite
matters,
COUNCILMAN ARMSTRONG AND COUNCILWOMAN SYNADINOS AGREED
to withdraw the motion just above and the second, respec-
tively.
D. Presentation of Sepulveda Boulevard Plan Line Study and
Recommendation to Appropriate Funds for Additional
Professional Services
Mr. William Glickman, Director of the Public Works Department,
introduced the presentation of the Sepulveda Boulevard Plan
Line Study and put forward the recommendation for the appropriation
of funds for additional professional services which have been per-
formed by the consultants, Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates.
Mr. Larry Wilson of Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
presented his firm's proposal for the ultimate development of
Sepulveda Boulevard between El Segundo Boulevard and Rosecrans
Avenue. As part of the presentation, Mr. Wilson reviewed the
various sections of Sepulveda Boulevard within the plan area,
reviewed the ownership of relevant parcels, and described the
nature and extent of modifications being proposed for each.
Following Mr. Wilson's presentation, questions and answers
were exchanged regarding various rights of way and traffic
patterns in this area.
Mr. Ray Sherwood, owner of one of the parcels in the affected
section of Sepulveda Boulevard, was present to speak against the
proposal. Mr. Sherwood asserted that going ahead with the
proposal would mean the loss of 29 feet of parking and related
space from his location. He argued that there would be no point
in widening Sepulveda Boulevard in the area proposed because at
both end points (E1 Segundo Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue)
the street is reduced from four lanes to three, thus creating a
bottleneck effect at both ends. He encouraged rerouting traffic
to other parallel streets in the area.
The Mayor asked when this project might be undertaken, in terms
of CalTrans' schedule and the availability of funding. Mr. Glick-
man stated that no financial support for this project is currently
available.
Mr. Peter Klika, with the law firm of Bouchalter, Nemer, Fields,
Chrystie & Younger, spoke on behalf of Messrs. Tony Brent and
John Romano, who own one of the parcels that would be affected
by the proposed widening. Mr. Klika stated that his clients
have submitted a plan to the City's Planning Department which
would alleviate anticipated difficulties with the proposed
widening, and requested an additional 60 days in order to
achieve resolution of this matter. Following discussion,
THE COUNCIL AGREED to allow Messrs. Tony Brent and John
Romano an additional 60 days in which to reach agreement
with the Planning Department on proposed revisions to the
Sepulveda Boulevard widening plan.
mom
Council Minutes
July,5, 1983
Y 59 �:3
Councilwoman Synadinos raised a question as to whether newly
planned construction would reduce the amount of available space
below the level required by the proposed widening plan. Following
discussion with Mr. Glickman, it was felt that there are procedural
safeguards in place which would eliminate the danger of eliminating
space required by the widening plan.
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILMAN SIADEK, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN
JOHNSON, AND UNANIMOUSLY PASSED, that $2,600.00 be allo-
cated from the General Fund Reserve to compensate Robert
Bein, William Frost & Associates for additional professional
services, as outlined in Revised Addendum No. 1, dated
February 25, 1983, to the contract for engineering services
on the Sepulveda Boulevard Widening Study.
At this point, the City Attorney clarified that at the June 21,
1983 meeting of the Council, the resolution in question (No. 3210)
included capital expenditures and other financial matters in a
single measure.
IT WAS THEN MOVED BY COUNCILMAN ARMSTRONG AND SECONDED BY
COUNCILWOMAN SYNADINOS that the motion adopted at the June 21,
1983 regular meeting regarding the budget for the 1983 -84
fiscal year (Resolution No. 3210) be reconsidered. The
following votes were cast, and THE MOTION WAS DEFEATED:
Ayes: Council Members Armstrong and Synadinos
Noes: Council Members Johnson, Siadek and Mayor Bue
Absent: Council Members None
VI REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
A. Request by Councilman Johnson for Consideration of
Establishing a 1984 Olympics Committee
Councilman Johnson spoke of what he felt is a need for a group
which would be willing to consider the appropriateness of various
requests related to the 1984 Olympics (e.g., requests for lodging
for those traveling to Olympic events from out of town) and to
act as a clearinghouse for these requests. Perhaps the Chamber
of Commerce or the Women's Club could take leadership here. The
City Manager was asked to examine the various possibilities for
such a group.
B. Other Reports
Councilman Johnson also reported on a Rapid Transit District
meeting which he had attended regarding the metro rail system
and distributed route maps to members of the Council.
Councilman Johnson announced that he had attended a meeting
for the Mayor regarding the recent exodus of motion picture and
television production from the Los Angeles area, with a resultant
loss of income to municipalities. Another meeting with repre-
sentatives of various cities is scheduled for September 14.
Councilman Armstrong noted that there will be a meeting of the
ANCLUC Steering Committee on July 7, 1983. Councilman Armstrong
also announced that he had presented the key to the City and a
seal to an Eagle Scout, the seventh to be so honored in the
E1 Segundo troop. He said that this was a most gratifying
experience.
-7- Council Minutes
July 5, 1983
X5993
The Mayor reported that he had had a very productive meeting with
representatives of the City of Guaymas, Mexico, and had discussed
arrangements for an exchange of students and cultural and artistic
activities.
Councilwoman Synadinos commended the Recreation and Parks Depart-
ment for their very successful Fourth of July festivities.
VII ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. Mr.
concerns
business
Dennis Martin, 836 East Grand Avenue,
regarding the recommended timetable
registration fees.
spoke about his
for revision of
B. Mr. Jim Uldrich, address not given, expressed his concerns
over some of the assumptions which he felt were given to Economic
Research Associates and which he felt guided their study, especially
what he saw as implicit encouragement of continued industrial develop-
ment within the City.
VIII CONSENT CALENDAR
Requests were made to discuss Items "D" and "F ", after which
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILMAN JOHNSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN
SYNADINOS AND PASSED that the balance of the items on the
Consent Calendar be aDnroved as recommended_
A. Warrants Nos. 79804 -79969 on Demand Register Summary No. 24
in total amount of $800.574.90
RATIFIED AND APPROVED
B. Inner Space Constructors request for second year extension
of a two -unit trailer permit located at 1950E Grand Avenue
EXTENSION APPROVED TO AUGUST 22, 1984
C. Reliance Fabricators request for a second year extension of
trailer permit located at 1940 E. Grand Avenue
EXTENSION APPROVED TO AUGUST 23, 1984
E. Request to declare Vehicle units 4001, 6402, 3339 and 1113
surplus and authorize sale by private auction
APPROVED AS REQUESTED
G. Request to approve Change Order No. 9 to contract with
McAlpine Construction Company for extension of 40 days and
other changes in total amount of $2,046.43, and acceptance
of the construction of the City's Maintenance Facility
(Project No. 81 -8) as satisfactorily completed as of
June 24. 1983.
REQUEST APPROVED AND MAYOR AUTHORIZED TO SIGN CHANGE ORDER
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
H. Request to approve Change Order No. 2 to contract with
J & R Construction for additional repairs in total amount
of $14,113.82; accept construction of repairs to main
line sewers (Project No. 82 -26) as satisfactorily complete
as of June 14, 1983, and appropriate funds for the Change
Order No. 2 from General Fund Reserves.
REQUEST APPROVED AND MAYOR AUTHORIZED TO SIGN CHANGE ORDER
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
-8- Council Minutes
July 5, 1983
X 5955
I. Request to accept the work of Pavement Coatings for applica-
tion of slurry seal at various locations (Project No. 82 -22)
as satisfactorily complete as of June 13, 1983
REQUEST APPROVED
J. Resolution approving Final Map of Tract No. 36900, Sierra
Pines Townhouses Ltd. Precise Plan No. 82 -1
entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 3214
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 36900 LOCATED WITHIN
SAID CITY
ADOPTED AS READ
IX CALL ITEMS FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
D. Bids for annual supply of paper towels and tissue
Councilman Siadek suggested that consideration be given to Ball
Industries, which is a local firm. The City Manager noted that
when a local firm's bid is within one percent of the lowest bid
received, it can be accepted as if it were the lowest. Compu-
tations were performed during the meeting and it was determined
that the bid of Ball Industries was in excess of the lowest bid
by more than one percent.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN SIADEK, SECONDED BY COUNCIL-
MAN ARMSTRONG, that the low bid of Blake Moffitt and Towne
for subject supplies be accepted in total amount of $5,934.71
including sales tax, and that a purchase order be issued to
said company in said amount. Motion carried by unanimous
vote.
F. California Alcoholic Beverage Control application from VGM,
Ltd, for new On -Sale Beer and Wine Eating Place license,
411 -1/2 Main Street (Formerly Gay Nineties)
Councilman Armstrong noted that there are currently 32 on -sale
liquor licenses within the City limits and 10 off -sale permits.
After discussion, MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN ARMSTRONG,
SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN SYNADINOS, that the application
from VGM, Ltd., for subject license be received and filed.
Motion carried.
X WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
A. Mr. Dennis Martin, 836 East Grand Avenue, regarding the
economic controversy in E1 Segundo.
The Mayor ordered this letter be filed.
XI REPORTS OF OFFICERS
A. City Manager Jones
1. Hughes Aircraft Request for Second Year Extension of
Trailer Permit Located at 2100 E. E1 Segundo Blvd
The Mayor temporarily stepped down as Chairman of the meeting;
the Mayor Pro Tem assumed the Chair.
-9- Council Minutes
July 5, 1983
A59PIG
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILMAN JOHNSON AND SECONDED BY
COUNCILWOMAN SYNADINOS that the request for a second -
year extension of a trailer permit to Hughes Aircraft
for a trailer located at 2100 East E1 Segundo Boulevard
be approved to expire August 18, 1984. The Mayor
abstained from voting; the motion was passed by unanimous
vote of the four Council members voting.
At this point, the Mayor resumed Chairmanship of the meeting.
2. Request to Establish a Study Session for Presentation of
Community Fire Life Safety Master Plan Project
It was agreed that this item be placed on the agenda for the
next regular meeting of the Council on July 19, 1983.
3. Report on Recommended Conversion of Present Water Fund
Accounting System to a Fully Costed Enterprise Fund
During the discussion which took place, it was emphasized that a
willingness to increase water rates to fund depreciation is
necessary if additional consultations are to be productive.
IT WAS THEN MOVED BY COUNCILMAN JOHNSON AND SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN SIADEK that the City Manager be authorized to
obtain additional information and proposals regarding the
possibility of a conversion of the present water fund
accounting system to a fully costed enterprise fund. The
motion was unanimously carried.
B. Director of Public Works Glickman
1. Two Quitclaim deeds for easements on Hessell Site -
Northwest corner of E1 Segundo and Sepulveda Boulevards
Advised that a request had been received from Butler Estates, Inc.,
the present owners of the Hessell site, that certain easements on
subject property, held by the City, be quitclaimed to them. Stated
the staff had determined the City has no further need for the ease-
ments, and therefore, recommended the request be honored.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN ARMSTRONG, SECONDED BY COUNCIL-
MAN JOHNSON, that the following resolution be adopted:
WHEREAS, that certain
easement, insofar as it pertains to and affects
the following described real property located
in the City of E1 Segundo, County of Los Angeles,
State of California, to wit:
The northerly 8.00 feet of Lots 350, 357
and 405 of Block 123 of E1 Segundo, Sheet
8 as per map recorded in Book 22, pages
106 and 107 of Maps, in the Office of the
County Recorder of said County, as reserved
in document No. 488, recorded July 16, 1958,
except the westerly 25.00 feet of said
northerly 8.00 feet of Lot 350.
is no longer needed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Mayor of the City of E1
Segundo be and he is hereby authorized to
execute a Quitclaim Deed for said easement from
the City of E1 Segundo to Butler Estates, Inc.
and the City Clerk to attest the same.
On roll call, said motion carried by unanimous vote.
-10-
Council Minutes
July 5, 1983
K 5�q
THEREAFTER, MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN ARMSTRONG,
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN JOHNSON, that the following resolu-
tion be adopted:
WHEREAS, that certain
easement, insofar as it pertains to and
affects the following described real property
located in the City of E1 Segundo, County of
Los Angeles, State of California, to wit,
Those portions of Lots 409, 410
and 434 in Block 123, E1 Segundo
Map Sheet 8, as recorded in Book
22, Pages 106 and 107 of Maps
in the Office of the County Recorder
of Los Angeles County, State of
California, described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the westerly
line of said Lot 409 and distant
northerly 11.00 feet from the south-
west corner of said Lot 409; Thence
North 89053'49" East along a line
parallel to and 11.00 feet northerly
of the southerly line of said Lots
409 and 410, a distance of 109.25
feet to a point; Thence North 0006'34"
West along a line parallel to and
109.25 feet easterly of the westerly
line of said Lot 409, a distance of
2.00 feet to a point; Thence north-
easterly along a curve whose tangent
is perpendicular to the last mentioned
course, said curve being concave north-
westerly and having a radius of 50.00
feet, through a central angle of 36052'12 ",
an arc distance of 32.18 feet more or less
to the point of intersection with the
easterly line of said Lot 434, said
point of intersection lying 23.00 feet
northerly of the southeast corner of
said Lot 434; Thence North 0006'34"
West along said easterly line of Lot
434 a distance of 27.00 feet to a point;
Thence South 71058'58" West along a line
a distance of 97.57 feet to the point of
intersection with the easterly line of
said Lot 409, said point of intersection
being 20.00 feet northerly of the south-
east corner of said Lot 409; Thence South
89053'49" West along a line parallel to
and 20.00 feet northerly of the said
southerly line of Lot 409 a distance of
46.42 feet to the point of intersection
with the westerly line of said Lot 409;
Thence South 0006'34" East along said
westerly line of Lot 409 a distance of
9.00 feet to the point of beginning
is no longer needed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Mayor of the City of E1
Segundo be and he is hereby authorized to
execute a Quitclaim Deed for said easement
from the City of E1 Segundo to Butler Estates,
Inc. and the City Clerk to attest the same.
On roll call, said motion carried by unanimous vote.
-11- Council Minutes
July 5, 1983
159fiS
2. Recommendation to Accept Two Easements for Street and
Storm Drain Purposes at Bungalow Drive and Abandoned
Railroad Right -of -Way.
Introduced two executed documents from Mr. John Shelton offering
dedication of the east half of the cul -de -sac on Bungalow Drive
north of Pine Avenue for public street purposes and dedication of
storm drain easement across his property. Reported that it is
staff's recommendation that the Council accept the offers of
dedication from Mr. Shelton and authorize the City Clerk to
record these documents.
Also presented a petition from Mr. John Shelton for relief from the
cost of the Storm Drain which should be properly borne by the party
whose property is the cause of the problem.
Mr. Shelton spoke against staff's recommendation and requested
relief from the requirement to offer the easement for storm drain
purposes. Following additional discussion,
MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN SIADEK, SECONDED BY MAYOR
BUE, that the following resolution be adopted:
WHEREAS, there has been presented
to this Council a certain Street Easement Deed dated
June 24, 1983, executed by Mr. John Shelton, granting
to the City of E1 Segundo an easement and right -of -way
for public street purposes, situated in the City of
E1 Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California,
described as follows:
That portion of Parcel 1,
6728, as per map recorded
Page 85 of Parcel Maps in
of the County Recorder of
County, State of Californ
as follows:
Parcel Map No.
in Book 73,
the Office
Los Angeles
La, described
Beginning at the Southwest corner of
said Parcel 1; Thence North 0007'01"
West 83.29 feet along the westerly
line of said Parcel 1 to its inter-
section with a curve concave southerly
having a radius of 37.00 feet, a
radial line of said curve at the
intersection thereof having a bearing
of North 9012'56" East; Thence easterly
along said curve through a central
angle of 92006'17" a distance of 59.48
feet; Thence tangent to said curve
South 11019'13" West 49.77 feet to
the beginning of a tangent curve con-
cave easterly, having a radius of 20.00
feet and a central angle of 2049'24 ",
Thence southerly along said tangent
curve 0.99 feet to a point in the
southwesterly line of said Parcel 1,
said southwesterly line being a curve
concave southwesterly and having a
radius of 849.55 feet; Thence north-
westerly along said southwesterly line
through a central angle of 1031'49" a
distance of 22.70 feet to the point of
beginning. (Bungalow Drive)
upon certain terms and conditions therein set
forth; and
-12-
Council Minutes
July 5, 1983
X 59iF19
WHEREAS, the Council has
examined said document and the City Attorney
has approved the same as to form.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby
accept said street easement deed on behalf
of the City of E1 Segundo; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
that the City Clerk be and she is hereby
authorized and directed to cause said instru-
ment to be recorded in the Office of the
County Recorder of the County of Los Angeles,
State of California.
On roll call, said motion carried by unanimous vote.
THEREAFTER, MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN SIADEK, SECONDED
BY MAYOR BUE, that the following resolution be adopted:
WHEREAS, there has been
presented to this Council a certain Grant of
Easement, dated June 24, 1983 executed by
Mr. John E. Shelton, granting to the City of
E1 Segundo an easement and right -of -way for
the construction of a storm drain pipeline and
appurtenances, in, under and along that certain
parcel of land situated in the City of E1
Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of Cali-
fornia, described as follows, to wit:
The southwesterly 9.00 feet of
Parcel 1, Parcel Map No. 6728,
as per map recorded in Book 73,
Page 85 of Parcel Maps in the
Office of the County Recorder
of Los Angeles County, State of
California, measured radially
from the southwesterly line of
said Parcel 1, (The sidelines
of said easement shall be prolonged
or shortened to terminate at the
easterly right -of -way line of
Bungalow Drive and the westerly
right -of -way line of Center Street).
upon certain terms and conditions therein set
forth; and
WHEREAS, the Council has
examined said document and the City Attorney
has approved the same as to form.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby
accept said grant of easement on behalf
of the City of E1 Segundo; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
that the City Clerk be and she is hereby
authorized and directed to cause said
instrument to be recorded in the office
of the County Recorder of the County of Los
Angeles, State of California.
On roll call, said motion carried by unanimous vote.
-13- Council Minutes
Juiy 5, 1983
x J9 0
XII
XIII
XIV
Xv
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS - None
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. Mr. Dennis Martin, 836 East Grand Avenue, requested informa-
tion regarding the method of collection of the proposed business
license fees, the period to be covered, etc. Councilman Siadek
requested that the City Manager prepare information relative to
this topic. It was emphasized that it will be a Council decision
as to whether the fees will cover any retroactive period.
RECESS
At the hour of 10:58 o'clock p.m., the Council recessed to a
closed session to discuss matters of wage negotiations. At the
hour of 11 :15 o'clock p.m,, the Council reconvened, all members
being present and answering roll call.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Attorney made a eulogistic statement in honor of Mr. Royal
M. Sorensen in which the members of the Council joined. No further
business appearing to come before the Council at this session, the
Mayor declared the meeting adjourned in memory of Mr. Sorensen,
time of adjournment being 11 :20 o'clock p.m.
APPROVED:
r
William D. Bue, Mayor
Respectfully submitted,
Valerie A. Burrowes, City Clerk
-14-
Council Minutes
July 5, 1983