Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
1965 MAR 22 CC MINX
E1 Segundo, California
March 22, 1965
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of E1 Segundo,
California, was held in the Council Chamber of the City Hall of said City
on the above date. Prior to calling the meeting to order, those present
joined in pledging allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America,
following which an invocation was given by Reverend Allen Johnson of the
First Baptist Church.
The meeting was then called to order by Herman L. McGill, Mayor,
the hour being 7 :00 oIclock p. m.
Councilmen Present:
Councilmen Absent
ROLL CALL
Frederick, Kimport, McElhaney, Nagel
and Mayor McGill;
None.
READING OF THE MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of E1 Segundo, California, held March 8, 1965, having been read and no error
or omission having been noted, it was moved by Councilman Nagel, seconded
by Councilman McElhaney, the minutes of said meeting be approved as re-
corded. Motion carried.
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS
18'73
1. The Mayor announced that this was the time and place hereto-
fore fixed for the reception of bids on cast iron pipe for the Water Department,
and inquired of the Clerk if she had any bids therefor. The Clerk replied that
she had received two bids. Moved by Councilman Frederick, seconded by
Councilman Kimport, that said bids be opened, examined and publicly declared,
which bids were as follows:
Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe Company - - - - - = $2. 807 per foot
United States Pipe and Foundry Company - - - - - - $2. 86 per foot
It was then moved by. Councilman Frederick, seconded by Councilman
McElhaney that said bids be referred to the Director of Public Works for
checking and report later at this meeting. Motion carried.
2. The Mayor announced that this was the time and place heretofore
fixed pursuant to statute in the matter of adopting the "Uniform Building
Code, 1964 Edition, Volume I" together with its Appendix and the "Uniform
Building Code Standards, 1964 Edition, Volume III ".
The Mayor inquired of the City Clerk if proper notice of the hearing
had been given and lashed, and the Clerk replied that affidavit of publication
The Mayor inquired of the City Clerk if any com=munications had been
received with reference to this matter, and the City Clerk advised that none
had been received.
The Mayor then inquired if any person in the Council Chamber desired
to address the Council regarding the adoption of the Uniform Building Code,
and there being no response, the Mayor declared the hearing closed..
The City Attorney read the title of Ordinance No. 633, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE "UNIFORM BUILD-
ING CODE, 1964 EDITION, VOLUME V. TOGETHER
WITH ITS APPENDIX AND THE "UNIFORM BUILD -
ING CODE STANDARDS, 1964 EDITION, VOLUME III ";
AND REPEALING ORDINANCES NOS. 594, 595, 609
AND 614 .AND ALL OTHER ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT
HEREWITH.
fc
X 18'74
Upon motion duly made and unanimously carried, the further reading
of Ordinance No. 633 was waived.
Following a motion made by Councilman Frederick, seconded by
Councilman McElhaney! Ordinance No. 633 which was introduced at a regular
meeting of the City Council held on the 22nd day of February, 1965, was adopted
by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Frederick, Kimport, McElhaney, Nagel
and Mayor McGill;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
3. The Mayor announced that this was the time and place heretofore
fixed pursuant to statute for the hearing in the matter of adopting by reference
the Public Health Code, Ordinance No. 7583, County of Los Angeles, as
amended, and inquired of the City Clerk if proper notice of the hearing had been
given and published. The City Clerk advised that affidavit of publication of
notice of the hearing was in her file.
The Mayor inquired of the City Clerk if any communications had been
received with reference to this matter, and was advised that none had been
received.
The Mayor then inquired if any person or persons in the Council
Chamber desired to address the Council regarding the adoption of the Public
Health Code, and there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
The City Attorney read the tiile of Ordinance No. 634, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE
"PUBLIC HEALTH CODE, (ORDINANCE NO. 7583)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, " AS AMENDED.
Upon motion duly made and unanimously carried, the further reading
of Ordinance No. 634 was waived.
Following the motion made by Councilman Frederick, seconded by
Councilman McElhaney, Ordinance No. 634, which was introduced at a regular
meeting of the City Council held on the 22nd day of February, 1965, was
adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Frederick, Kimport, McElhaney, Nagel
and Mayor McGill;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
Mayor McGill stated that the hearing on the Appeal of J. and J.
Salvage Company from the decision of the Planning Commission would be held
following Item 10 on the agenda, Unfinished Business.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
The following written communications received from persons, firms
or corporations hereinafter named, were read to the Council and were dis-
posed of in the manner indicated:
1. MR. ACE T. BEALL, being an objection to the use of one of the
parking spaces in the City -owned parking lot on the east side of Main Street
in the 400 block. City Manager Sailors advised the Council that the matter
had been corrected by the City Engineer, who stated that the "No Parking"
restriction had been removed from the parking space. The Mayor requested
that Mr. Beall be so notified, and the communication was ordered filed.
2. DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, being
application for the following: a) Off -sale beer and wine license for Jerry's
Market, 601 Virginia St. by Marion L. and S. Eugene Coles and Archie D.
and Norma L. MacEachern, and,b) person -to- person transfer Type 47, for
the Crown Imperial Restaurant. Ordered filed.
-2-
X 18'75
3. CITY OF CULVER CITY, recommending reciprocal police aid
between Culver City, and`th City of'E1;Segundo, : and transmitting copies of
proposed Agreement. CiLy ivia,.ager �jdriors stao:d tha Police Department had
indicated it would like to participate in this service. After discussion, it was
moved by Councilman Kimport, seconded by Councilman McElhaney, the fol-
lowing resolution be adopted:
RESOLVED, that that certain form of agreement between the
City of E1 Segundo, and:the City ©f`�Culver C-ity', for reciprocal
police aid, presented to this 1.;0unC1i ac cries rnet ing, be and the
same is hereby approved; and a copy ordered placed on file in the
office of the City Clerk; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor be and he is
hereby authorized to execute said agreement for and on behalf of the
City and the City Clerk to attest.
Carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Frederick, Kimport, McElhaney, Nagel
and Mayor McGill;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
4. AMERICAN MISSIONARY SOCIETY, being request for permission
to conduct door -to -door solicitatibn in E1 Segundo during April, 1965. A re-
port from the Police Department was also submitted, which the Council requested
to be read. Ordered filed.
5. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, urging co-
operation and support of the City Council of the City of E1 Segundo, in support
of the reapportionment as ordered by the Supreme Court. The Council desiring
to go on record as supporting the Supreme Court in this matter, it was moved
by Councilman Frederick, seconded by Councilman McElhaney, that Reso-
lution No. 2118, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORT-
ING THE REAPPORTIONME14T AS ORDERED BY
THE SUPREME COURT AND OPPOSING ANY
LEGISLATION CONTRARY THERETO..
which was read, be adopted.
On roll call, said motion carried and said resolution was adopted by the following
vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Frederick, Kimport, McElhaney, Nagel
and Mayor McGill;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
6. NOEL AND LOUISE ECKERSLEY, thanking the Police and Fire
Departments for the prompt and efficient assistance rendered by them, and
expressing sincere appreciation for help received. Copies having been sent to
the Police and Fire Departments, this correspondence was ordered filed.
7. MRS. OSCAR B. HANSEN , 803 Eucalyptus Drive, calling the
Council's attention to the continued violation of R -1 property located at 809
Eucalyptus Drive, where a plumbing business is conducted. Pictures of used
plumbing fixtures and sewer pipe stored in the backyard of the address were
also presented. Mrs. Hansen requested that immediate action be taken to
correct this violation. After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Frederick,
seconded by Councilman Nagel, that the matter be referred to the City Prose-
cutor to consider prosecution; that the Director of Building Safety be instructed
to contact the Health Department for a possible violation and that the Planning
Commission be requested to make a study of parking commercial vehicles in a
residential zone, in order to enforce parking restrictions. Motion carried.
-3-
1
X 1876
8. ROBERT E. O'BANNON, Director of Building Safety, requesting
that the matter of two new zone classifications as set forth in Planning Com-
mission Resolution No. 611, referred to the City Council on March 8, 1965,
be referred back to the Planning Commission for revision. Moved by Council-
man Frederick, seconded by Councilman Kimport, the request be approved and
said matter be referred back to the Planning Commission for revision. Motion
carried.
REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
1. Councilman Nagel reported that he had attended a meeting where
a member of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board explained the functions of
that Board. He had learned that any objection by the City to the issuance of a
particular license could only be on the grounds of such matters as lack of
adequate parking, insufficient lighting or violations of '_ - ilding Code. The
approximate cost to the City for filing a protest would be $50 to $100 and it
was estimated that approximately a year would be needed for processing such
a protest.
REPORTS OF OFFICERS
CITY MANAGER SAILORS MADE REPORTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. Presented for the Council's consideration the communication from
Lennox Disposal Service stating their proposal for repayment of the $10, 598. 20
overpayment on the existing rubbish collection contract. After discussion, it
was moved by Councilman McElhaney, seconded by Councilman Nagel, that City
Attorney Bush and City Manager Sailors be directed to proceed with negotiations
with the attorney for Mr. Holthe, and if necessary, to proceed with legal action
to establish that this amount is legally owed and to arrange for collection of
same, with the terms left open. Carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Frederick,
and Mayor McGill;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
Kimport, McElhaney, Nagel
2. Presented recommendations for revision of entrance examination
weights for Police and Fire Departments as follows:
Written Examination 50%
Oral Interview 50%
(failure to pass any of the parts shall be sufficient cause to eliminate the
applicant. )
Promotional examinations shall consist of written examination and oral inter-
view for the Police Department with weights of 5016 each.
Promotional examinations for the Fire Department for Fire Engineers shall be
weighted as follows:
Written Examination 30. %,
Performance Test 40%
Oral Interview 300/6
Promotional examinations for Fire Captains and Battalion Chiefs:
Written Examination
Oral Interview
60%
40%
It was further recommended that the additional requirements for entrance into
the Fire Department be expanded to include 20 college units. The requirements
for the Police Department would remain unchanged, i. e.,, completion of 12th
grade or possession of G. E. D. certificate.
Motion made by Councilman Kimport, seconded by Councilman
McElhaney, that the recommended revisions as stated above be approved.
Motion carried by the following vote:
-4-
Ayes: Councilmen Frederick,
and Mayor McGill;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
X 1877
Kimport, McElhaney, Nagel
3. Recommended that the Council adopt a resolution regarding joining
with other cities in the County in forming a county -wide coordinating group in
establishing the Sheriff as County -wide Coordinator for Disaster and Civil
Defense activities in times of major disaster and emergency. Motion made by
Councilman Kimport, seconded by Councilman Nagel, that Resolution No. 2119,
entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
I HE CITY OF EL SEGUNDG, C �:LIFOR \?IA,
PROVIDING FOR CITY RECOGNITION OF
THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY OPERATIONAL
AREA ORGANIZATION.,
which was read, be adopted.
Motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Frederick,
and Mayor McGill;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen. None.
Kimport, McElhaney, Nagel
4. Presented for the Council's consideration a proposal from the
Marcellus L. Joslyn Foundation, 406 Wilshire Blvd., Santa Monica, California,
regarding the proposed Senior Citizens Building, and recommended that the
Council approve this proposal and the Mayor be authorized to sign. This pro-
posal was as follows:
1. The City to proceed forthwith to procure the design and
construction of a facility to be used as an adult recreation center,
having approximately 5, 910 sq. ft. , and to be located in the recrea-
tional park now owned and operated by the City.
2. The Joslyn F cundation will aLvan ce a total sum of
$60, 000. 00, in it; all.:ie:.ts of $2C, :,UJ. Cv each On or before
September 15, ,613, Dece : ber 15, 196-7, anc::,:.arch 15, 1966.
T a:,cv: co_.-:..:.:me: t, h� .: vc_ - : _o:.,-ingent upon re-
ceipt of avai-. ---e ;u:1cs oy tc.e Founa&z-.o_., s:_- _ ;.:a limited to the
income fror:. i oszments in making difficulty is
foreseen i:::..eoting the above schedule, it : _usc we u:.derstood that
should funds not be available in sufficient a c.'L nts, t::a program may
be delayed, and the Foundation shall not Ne for any
injury or da..:ages resuitinb from such delay.
3. '-'r-.e balance of the cost and - uction of
the faciliL-. , ze borne by the City o' aL -: as
costs of ...a_..ce.:c.:.ce and operation
facilizy shall be known as � c,s '.yn -;e:c ::ration
Center , :z ,)t:-ie_ title to that effect as may be mutually
afire. u....
MC",`iO . . ay Co --- cilr__4n Nagel, secon;:e(f by F. ederick,
that the proposa_ L. Joslyn Foundacio:. ding the p_ oposed
Senior Citizens ._. _ <:b, ac ap.: "��d as presented above, and that the Iv:ayor
be authorized to s:,,._. 14c._o:: L::-r-.ed by the followinb
Ayes: _:aen Frederick,
iViayor McGill;
Noes: Councl--inen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
Kimport, iVic Elhaney, :Nagel
The City Manager was commended on his negotiations with the Joslyn Foundation
on behalf of the City.
-5-
X 1878
5. Reported that, as previously instructed, he had held a meeting with
the local medical doctors regarding instituting annual physical examinations for
the Police, Fire and certain other employees. Following is the recommended
procedure:
Included in the overall annual check -up would be the following examinations:
1. Complete urinalysis (UA)
2. Complete blood count (CBC) Blood count to include Hemoglobin,
Hematocrit, white blood comt and differential count.
3. Chest X -rays (PA Post ero- Anterior) 14" x 17 ".
4. History: Summary of significant findings from patient's medical
history, to include: Illnesses, injuries, operations, past occupation.
5. Physical examination by doctor to include such things as: Vision,
weight: temperat • ,, pulse, blood pressure, eyes, ears, nose,
throat, skin, lungs, h-eart, abdomen, check for hernia and
hemorrhoids, spine, upper extrem:.: z-: , lower extremities.
6. The doctor would then make any recommendations depending on
whether or not he found any abnormalities.
All Policemen and Firemen under the age of 35 years will be examined
at two -year intervals until they attain that age, Beginning with the age of 35,
annual physicals will be give: at City expense. Each individual upon attaining
the age of 45 will be given an electrocardiogram in addition to the above - mentioned
Examinations at City expense.
Another electrocaNdioU ram will be given at the age of 55 years and each
year thereafter at City expense.
If, during the course of bi- annual or annual examinations, the examining
physician indicates that an electrocardiogram or any other special examination or
treatment is deemed necessary; the City Manage: will be so informed and the
employee will be directed tc go to his family physician or a physician of his choice
to obtain the necessary treatment recommended or submit a statement from his
family physician that the treatment is not necessary.
Any disqualifying cal defect detected as a result of these annual
physicals will be certified by the employee's family physician as a disqualifying
factor in his present err_nloyment.
A quotation e $20. 00 has been received for performing these exami-
nations.
The City Nl ^rager re=-.amended that he be given authority to contact
the local medical decto_ : 'o c ee :✓hich cr them could perform these services for
the sum indicated. '-ac'. t c-e who can furnish these services for this amount
will be given forms _=1 c;'.. :_ an employee is scheduled for examination, it will
be determined to cf t::e:;^ c:oct,-rs he will go and a purchase order will be
issued. The exar_ini:. p:.y ici�_a iz eac':; caca must to one other than his family
physician.
Motion was 1:,y Cc. ,ncilman Nagel, seconded by Councilman
Frederick that tI:° fcr p'.:ysical examinations for Police, Fire and
certain other employees, as presented by the City Manager, be approved.
Motion carried by the follcwin vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Frederick, Kimport, McElhaney, Nagel
and 1., ,Tayor McGill;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
CITY ATTORNEY BUSH MADE REPORT AS FOLLOWS:
1. Presented a request for Quitclaim Deed from Standard Oil Company
of California, covering water pipeline easement over a portion of Lot 5, Block 104,
located on Main St. at Imperial Ave.
Moved by Councilman Frederick, seconded by Councilman Kimport, the
following resolution be adopted:
ME
X 1879
WHEREAS, the easement over a ~)ortion of Lot 5, Blocl: 134,
as per map recur Lied in Book 20, P.-,-es .)2 and 23 of Maps,
office of the Cis rnty ,,'ocerder of Los Angeles County, is no longer
r,oeded;
NOW, +r"F.iZ EFORE, BE i" RESOLV D, thy., the :`.;ayor an6
I(Cil;Y are li . Gad au..i li%i i7.1'l. .iii. ...;'r .. .'i.'�tec. t6
,Do —c'; ;or sari e::.sement frOIil t�-,o \ :L y iC
Coil `viii �)eiil�' O,
Carried by the following vote:
Ayes. Councilmen Frederick,
�'; • or l'tc��ili;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
D: :'.CTOR OF PU}LIC ✓O R; : U✓ r
Kimport, McElhaney, Nagel and
1. Presented for ttLe Council's consideration, I cans and Speci:ications
for t he construction of the grave crossing at llougias btreet cnr— tC1e x'aciiic
Electric and Santa Fe railroad tracks, as authorized by t;�e Public Utilities
Commission, and recommended said plans be approved and the City Clerk be
authorized to advertise for bids.
Moved by Councilman Frederick, seconded by Councilman Kimport,
the following resolution be adopted:
RESOLVED, that a copy of ''SPECIFICATION NO. 64 -1 and
NOTICE INVITING BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DOUGLAS STRE ET
RAILROAD CROSSING 100 FEET NOR T OF UTAH STREET IN THE
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, dated March 22, 1965, pre-
sented to this Council at this meeting, be approved, and a copy placed
on file in the office of the City Clerk; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that sealed tics b�: and the same
are hereby invited under said Notice, and that the Clerk be and
she is hereby authorized and instructed to cause saic Notice to be
given and published in time, form and manner as required by law, the
date for reception of bids being hereby fixed for April 12, 1965.
Carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Frederick,
and :Mayor McGill;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
Kimport, McElhaney, Nagel
2. Presented for the Council's consideration, an Ab eemen t of Sub-
ordination from Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Conipany and a r:ib:.way Ease-
ment Deed from Standard Oil Company, granting- to the City certain necessary
rights in connection with the construction of the grade crossing at Douglas Street
and the railroad tracks of the Pacific Electric and the Atchison, Topeka and
Santa Fe railroads, and recommended that these be accepted and that the City
Clerk be authorized to arrange for their recordation.
Motion made by Councilman McElhaney, seconded by Councilman
Frederick, that the following resolution be adopted:
RESOLVED, that that certain Highway Easement Deed, dates
February 10, 1965, from t't;e Standard Oil Company of California, &, -d
that certain Agreement of Subordination dated February 3, 1965, from
the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, granting to the City cf,
E1 Segundo, California certain rights for construction of the northerly
trade crossing at Douglas Street, wit::ia said City upon and across the
fo: owi:�t described real property in the State of California, County of
Los Arigeies, City of E1 Segundo as follows:
-7-
EMU
Parcel 1:
That ,portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 18, Township 3
Soutr Range 14 West, in the Rancho Sausal Redondo, in the City
of E1 Segundo, county of Los Angeles, state of California, as
shown on the map filed in Case No. 11629 Superior Court of
said County, on June 21, 1890, in the office of the County Clerk
of said County, a copy of which map appears in the files of the
County Surveyor of said County, as Clerk's riled Map No. 218,
described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of said Scc:ic-
a t ,cord of Survey filed in Boo,c ?:- ..O. Veys,
in the office of the County Recorder of saic1 County, and also as
shown on the map of Tract No. 26556, recorded in Book 675,
Pages 93 and 94 of Maps, in said office of the County Recorder;
thence along the north line of said Section 18, North :.8° 55' 25"
West 1352. 58 feet to the center line intersection c,: y So,oundo
Boulevard (100 feet wide) and Douglas Street ;76. Ov feet wide),
as shown on said map of Tract No. 26556; thence South
0° 03' 52" 'Vast along the center line of said Dcuglas Street
2219. 92 feet to a point in the northwesterly right of way line of
the Pacific Electric Railway Company (80 feet wide), as shown
on said map of Tract No. 26556, said point being the true point
of beginning; thence South 620 25' 32" West along said north-
westerly right of way line 42. 89 feet to a point in the westerly
line of said Douglas Street; •hence South 00 03' 52" West along
the southerly prolongation. of said westerly line of Douglas Street
103. 44 feet, - more .or less, to a point in the northwesterly
right of way line of the Atchison, Topeka : nd Santa Fe Railway
Company (60 feet wide), said line being 60 feet (measured at
right angles) northwesterly of and parallel with the southeasterly
right of way line of tae Atc'..ison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
Company (60 feet wide), as shown on map of Tract No. 26557,
recorded in Book 675, Pages 95 to 98 of Maps, Records of said
County; thence Nortn 43° 25' 53" East along said northwesterly
right of way line 1 :0. 68 feet to a point in the southerly pro-
longation of the easterly line of said Douglas Street; thence
North 0° 03' 52" East along said southerly prolongation of said
easterly line of Douglas Street 62. 78 feet, more or less, to a
point in the said northwesterly right of way line of the Pacific
Electric Railway Company; ti,ence South 620 25' 32" West along
said northwesterly right of way line 42. 90 feet to the true point
of beginning.
Parcel 2:
Beginning at the northeast corner of said Section i8, as shown
on a Record of Survey filed in Book 63, Page 37 of Record of
Surveys, in the office of the County Recorder of said County,
and also as shown on the map of Tract No. 26556, recorded in
Book 675, Pages 93 and 94 of Maps, in said office of the County
Recorder; thence along the north line of said Section 18, North
890 55' 25" West 1352. 58 feet to the center line intersection. of
E1 Segundo Boulevard (100 feet wide), and Douglas Street
(76. 00 feet wide), as shown on said map of Tract No. 26556;
thence South 0° 03' 52" West along the center line of said Douglas
Street and southerly prolongation thereof 2303. 03 feet to a point
in the northwesterly right of way line of the Atchison, Topeka and
Santa Fe Railway Company (60 feet wide), said right of way line
being 60 feet (measured at right angles) northwesterly of and
parallel with the southeasterly right of way line of the Atchison,
Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (60 feet wide), as shown
on map of Tract No. 26557, recorded in Book 675, Pages 95 to
98 of Maps, Records of said County, said point being the true
point of beginning; thence South 43° 25' 53" West along said
northwesterly right of way line 55. 34 feet to a point in the
southerly prolongation of the westerly line of said Douglas Street;
-- thence South 00 03' 52" West along said southerly prolongation. of
::
said westerly line o Douglas Street 87. 38 feet, more or less,
to a point in the southeast. riy right of way line of the Atchison,
Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, as shown on said map
of Tract No. 26557; thence Nortin 43° 25' 53" East along said
southeasterly right of way line 11 C. 68 feet to a point in the
southerly prolongation of the easterly line of said Douglas
Street; thence Nort:. 3° 03' 52' East aionL; the southerly pro -
longatl0n of said cagier yJ. _i -.� o- wil as .S-Lri et 8 7. 38 feet,
more or :ass, to a o: right of way
line of the Atchison, l OjDE:& a : :o �u : :�. r � .,ai.Way Company;
thence South 43° 25' 53" West along said northwesterly right of
way 55. 34 feet to the true point of beginning,
for public street purposes, be and the sarne is hereby acce , ed for and
on behalf of the City of Ll Segunl_ o a-.d
BE 'IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and she is
hereby authorized and directed to cause; said instrument to be filed for
record in the office of the County Recorder of 1.os Angeles County,
California.
Carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Frederick-, LKizmport, I1icE lhaney, Nagel
and Mayor McGill;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
3. Reported that the City of . Segundo now has reservoir storage of
approximately 5 million gallons and th,.-L water sales ammount to approximately
15 million gallons per day. The Vetropolitan Water District, the supplier of
water for the entire City, is most anxious t::at -�..v= City construct adequate storage
facilities, since the District's distribution sysiam is not capable of supplying
peak water demands. It is therefore :r.andatory t at she local agencies provide
their own storage. In view of the urgency of planning fort ,e additional storage,
it was recommended that the City Engineer be authorized to conduct discussions
with a qualified consulting engineering firm and request a proposal for the design
of additional storage capacity which would '.e presented to the Council for review
and approval.
Motion made by Councilman. Nagel, seconded by Councilman McElhaney
that the City Engineer be authorized to contact a qualified consulting engineering
firm and request a proposal for the design of additional storage capacity. Motion
carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Frederick,
and Mayor McGill;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
Kimport, McElhaney, Nagel
4. Reported that there had been a failure from the transformer bank to
the small baseball diamond at the Recreation. Center; that the electrical conduit
had filled with water and it was felt that the best and cheapest way would be to
seal off the present one with cement and install a new one, using City forces.
It was felt that the conduit for the proposed Joslyn Center should be installed at
the same time. Mr. Webb requested that City l :arager Sailors be authorized to
receive bids for the electrical work which would be in an amount less than $2500
and be authorized to accept the lowest responsible bid.
Motion made by Councilman Frederick, seconded by Councilman Kimport
that the City Manager be authorized to tail for bids on the replacement of the
electrical conduit to the small baseball diamond and for a conduit to service the
Joslyn Center at a cost of approximately $900. 00. Motion carried by the following
vote:
Ayes: Councilmen F, rederick, Kimport, XIcElhaney, Nagel
and Mayor McGill,-
Noes: Councilmen ;'N'one;
Absent: Councilmen None.
S. Reported that the bids for cast iron pi" received earlier at this
meeting had been cn2c,:ec' ._ „c: ;n; the ,.�c Cast Iron Pipe
Company in the ammount o- ;2. lov.. It was then moved
by Councilman Fredericl•:, ,:c_cc ;., ;.c,c::)y Counc. Xi.-, ,art, that the bid of
Pacific States Cast L on ripe _:.,: ;,..� , : %J 7 per foot, be
accepted and that the City �:anager 'bt aut:.j.•,z0 tc i6sue a )u.-chase order to
said Company. Motion carried by tloe following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Frederick,
and Mayor McGill;
Noes: Councilmen None;
_absent: Councilmen None.
Kimport, McElhaney, • Nagel
n'c',ock p. r;,. , .t
the hour of 9:10 o'clock p. m. , the Courci.._ I ,: ;,.. .,. ... .
answering roll call: Frederick, Ki:n. port, McElhaney, Nagel and Mayor McGill.
SPECIAL ORDER, OF BUSINESS CONTINUED
The Mayor announced that this was tl.nie time and place heretofore fixed
fora public hearing, under the provisions of 'C hapter 34 (Zoning) of the Code of the
City of E1 Segundo, on the appeal of J. and J. Salvage Company from the decision
of the Planning Commission revoking the Conditional Use Permit issued to
J. and J. Salvage Company as set forth in its Resolution No._ 607:. ;
It was then asked of the City Clerk whether notice of the time, place and
purpose of this hearing had been duly giver, and published, and if she had on file
in her office the affidavits showing such notice. The City Clerk advised that
notice had been duly and regularly given and the affid 'ts establishing such fact
were on file in her office together with the files and transcript of the proceedings
before the Planning Commission, from - ,h this appeal is being taken;
thereupon, the files and records of the Planning Commission received by the
City Clerk were ordered made a part of these proceedings.
It was stated that, inasmuch as this was an appeal from the Planning
Commission's action, and all the records and transcript of that body had been
made a part of the records of these proceedings on appeal, it would be of value
for the purpose of avoiding needless repetition and prolonging the hearing that
.the record not be duplicated with evidence tizeretofore received. It was stated
:that those appearing were privileged, however, to conduct their appeal and
oppose the appeal, as the case may be, in such manner as they saw fit.
It was announced that the Council would first hear from those who ap-
peared on behalf of the appellant J. and J. Salvage Company.
Following the. presentation on behalf of the J. and J. Salvage Company,
the audience was advised, the Council would hear from those who, appeared in
opposition to the appeal. After those in opposition to the appeal had been.heard
the appellant would be heard in rebuttal.
The Mayor said that if the gent'----: . who were representing the appellants
and the respondents were in accord with this outline of procedures, he would
next suggest that they give estimates of time that would be consumed in the pre-
sentation of their respective positions and that they try to adhere to that time
limit, bearing in mind, however, that this was a solicitation of their cooperation
and not to be construed as a restriction upon their right to fully represent their
clients.
The City Attorney suggested that anyone in the audience who wished to
speak in the matter, be invited to state their name and address, whether they
would speak for or against the appeal and how long they estimated their pre-
sentation to be. At this time, Mr. Jerry Moore, 612 Indiana Court, Apt.' 3,
stated that he wished to speak for approximately 5 ...mutes in support of the
Planning Commission's decision. Mr. Moore was then asked to make his
presentation first. Mr. Moore asked that the Council consider the community
as a whole in this matter and, in the: -interest of progress, uphold the decision
of the Planning Commission.
X 1883
City Attorney Bush stated that in speaking with the two attorneys who
were representing parties of interest at this meeting, it was suggested that
he acquaint the Council with the findings of the Planning Commission by reading
all or part of Resolution No. 607 of the Planning Commission which was the
findings which that body adopted following their hearing and which is the subject
of this appeal. He read as follows: "The Planning Commission now makes the
following findings of facts and conclusions of the law. The Commission finds,
1) that pursuant to the allegations of purported violations contained in
Specification 3 of Resolution No. 603, that complainants by preponderance of
evidence, established that a violation in fact does exist in that certain structures
have been erected on said premises which are not in conformity with the Building
Code of the City of E1 Segundo, and that a building permit for said structures had
not been obtained, pursuant to Code, prior to construction; 2) that J. and J.
Salvage Company is in violation of Specification 4 of Resolution No. 603, in that
materials and sundry salvage have been stored on the premises for a period of
several months prior to the hearing as to exceed the height of eight feet prescribed
by the Conditional Use Permit; 3) that J. and J. Salvage Company is in violation
of Specification 6 of Resolution No. 603, in that the paved area required between
the front property line and the front wall extending the width of the premises has
not been used solely for off - street parking as so prescribed by the Conditional
Use Permit, and has, on several occasions, been recently used for the storage
of salvage materials. "
The Notice of Appeal filed by Brinton N. Bowles, Attorney for J. and J.
Salvage Company in part provides that the appeal is on all grounds provided by
law and particularly upon the grounds of the insufficiency of the evidence to
sustain the decision.
Mr. Bush stated that the Attorneys would argue these issues and it
would be in order to call upon Mr. Bowles to proceed first.
Brinton N. Bowles, Attorney for J. and J. Salvage Company, then ad-
dressed the Council on behalf of his client, the appellant; argued that the
evidence presented was insufficient to sustain the decision of the Flanning Com-
mission to revoke the Conditional Use Permit; that much extraneous evidence
had been presented; that Mr. Stewart of J. and J. Salvage Company had felt
no violation to the Building Code had been made when the sheds were built,
particularly as he was told by a former Building Inspector that a permit was not
necessary; that the violation of stacking cars above the allowed height was not
a permanent thing, but only until cars could be removed; that the salvage yard
is situated on a grade which allows full view from cars on Rosecrans Avenue;
and that Mr. Stewart has had plans drawn up for a presentable building to be
erected when the grade of Rosecrans is changed in the near future. Mr. Bowles
further presented the argument that the salvage company is performing a service
to the community that is necessary and that this community has not outgrown such
a service any more than it has outgrown other manufacturing business in this
area.
Norman J. Oliver, Attorney, then addressed the Council on behalf of
Unimerc Corporation, Space Technology Laboratories, Utah Construction and
Mining Corporation and Marvin Davis, property owners adjacent to the salvage
yard. He argued that the decision of the Planning Commission was amply sup-
ported by evidence presented; that the record disclosed violations had been
consistently long- standing even after July, 1955 when Mr. Stewart had been put
on notice that the Council would tolerate no further violations. He further argued
that in the best interest of the development of the surrounding area, the decision
of the Planning Commission should be upheld.
Following Mr. Oliver's conclusion of his presentation, Mr. Bowles,
pursuant to agreement between the two attorneys appearing on behalf of clients,
gave a brief rebuttal argument.
No persons responded to the Mayor's inquiry whether there was
additional evidence or arguments to be presented. Thereupon, the public
hearing was closed.
Councilman McElhaney stated that a possible conflict of interest could be
construed from his being associated with a firm that is looking at land in the
area involved in the hearing and for that reason disqualified himself from par-
ticipating in the discussion and vote.
-11-
�FL
! A !
Motion was made by Councilman Kimport, seconded by Councilman
Frederick, that the matter be taken under consideration until the next regular
meeting on April 12, 1965. Motion carried.
PAYING BILLS
The following bills, having had the approval of the Committee on Finance
and Records, were read, Warrants Nos. 8600 thru 8702 inclusive:
General Fund - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - $ 92,799.16
Nater Operating Fund - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 142, 950. 75
Library Fund - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 2,555.91
Water Consumers Fund - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 54.65
Trust Fund- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 30.00
TOTAL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $238,390.47
Moved by Councilman McElhaney, seconded by Councilman Nagel, the
demands be allowed and warrants ordered drawn on and paid out of the respective
funds covering the same. Carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Frederick, Kimport, McElhaney, Nagel
and Mayor McGill;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
The hour being 10:45 o'clock p.m. , the Council recessed to a personnel
session in the Mayor's office. At the hour of 1 1: 15 o'clock p.m. the Council
reconvened with the following members answering roll call: Frederick, Kirnport,
McElhaney, Nagel and Mayor McGill.
Mayor McGill announced the appointment of Mr. Myron Yates to a
four -year term on the Planning Commission, -,nic'i term will expire on
Februc_-., 22, 196-, e -.1d asked that this appointment be approved.
Motion made by Councilman Frederick, seconded by Councilman Nagel,
that the appointment of Mr. Myron Yates to a four -year term on the Planning
Commission, said term to expire February 22, 1969, be approved. Motion
carried.
No further business to come before the Council at this meeting, it was
moved by Councilman Nagel, seconded by Councilman Kimport, the meeting
adjourn, the hour of adjournment being 11: 20 o'clock p. m. Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
APPROVED:
i y Clerk
e
Mayor
-12-