1953 APR 01 CC MINV 353
E1 Segundo, California
April 1, 1953
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of E1 Segundo,
California, was held in the Council Chamber of the City Hall of said
City on the above date, having been called to order at 7:00 o'clock P.M.
by William R. Selby, Mayor.
ROLL CALL
Councilmen Present: Baker, Gordon, Peterson, Swanson and
Mayor Selby;
Councilmen Absent: None.
READING OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the regular meeting held on the 25th day of March, 1953,
having been read, and no errors or omissions having been noted, it was moved
by Councilman Baker, seconded by Councilman Swanson, the minutes of said
meeting be approved as recorded. Carried.
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS
At this time Mayor Selby announced that the Council would proceed with
a public hearing duly and regularly called and ordered by the City Council
of the City of E1 Segundo to be held at this time and place under the pro-
visions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of E1 Segundo. This public hear-
ing was so called and ordered for the purpose of publicly hearing the appeal
of Clarence M. Burce and Caroline K. Burce from the decision of the Planning
Commission of the City of E1 Segundo, as made and set forth by said Com-
mission in its Resolution No. 138, which was adopted on the 9th day of March,
1953, and affecting certain portions of Lot 2, Block 106, El Segundo Tract.
The Mayor inquired of the City Clerk if notice of the time, place and
purpose of this hearing had been duly given and published, and if she had on
file in her office the affidavits showing such notice. The City Clerk ad-
vised that notice had been duly and regularly given and the affidavits
establishing such fact were on file in her office together with the complete
file of the Planning Commission in said matter.
Mayor Selby thereupon announced that the files in said matter would be
made a part of the record of this public hearing.
The Mayor then inquired if any written protests had been received and
the City Clerk stated none had been received by her. The Mayor then stated
the Council would proceed to hear evidence from those persons present who
desired to speak in favor of the granting of the variance applied for, and
then would afford those opposed to the granting of said variance an oppor-
tunity to speak.
Mr. Dudley Gray stated he was an attorney, representing Mr. Burce in
the matter. He presented for the Council's consideration three photographs,
which he stated he felt truly and accurately show the structures as they now
exist on the property owned by Mr. Burce, and which he desired to file as
exhibits. The Mayor stated that if there is no objection, same will be re-
ceived as evidence and marked as flExhibits Nos. 1, 2 and 3 „, respectively.
Mr. Gray: As you know, there has been a structure commenced building
on rear property of Mr. Burce and I now present two pictures of structures
now existing in partially constructed state.
-1-
V 354
The Mayor stated that if there is no objection, same will be re-
ceived as evidence and marked "Fad ibits Nos. 4 and 5n, respectively.
Mr. Gray: Mr. and Mrs. Burce have obtained signatures of various
property owners adjacent to and within 300 feet of property involved.
Have document in which appears some eighteen signatures, giving consent to
variance requested.
Mr. Gray thereupon presented said document to the Mayor, and the Mayor
announced that if there is no objection, same will be received as evidence
and marked "Exhibit No. 6n.
The City Engineer then delivered to Mr. Gray a map, indicating the
property owned by Mr. Burce, upon which is shown in various colors, the
ground upon which is presently existing structures, the ground upon which
structures are presently being erected and additional ground owned by Mr.
Burce. Mr. Gray explained that a portion of the ground lying easterly of
presently existing structures, a 20 -foot strip, will be used for ingress and
egress to the properties, such ingress and egress being from Imperial Highway,
and the present strip, from, Acacia Avenue, used at this time for ingress and
egress, will be closed. Mr. Gray further stated that at the time of acquir-
ing the property shown in "pink" on said map, Mr. Burce was under the impres-
sion that becuase the property was used as a street, it would in effect be a
street and considered the pink shaded area would be the front of the lot; that
he is now informed that since it fronts on R -3 it would not be good zoning,
and that plan has been entirely done away with, and he now finds the only way
for ingress and egress would be through to Imperial Highway; that he plans to
build apartments above the garages which are presently being erectedy and is
seeking to have this Council give variance to allow them to build such a build-
ing as have particularly described and to finish structure partially completed.
Mr. Gray further stated that seemingly most objections to building a
two -story building were because tenants might look down over property to the
rear, and Mr. Burce has accordingly agreed to build cloister type windows in
rear.
Mr. Gray: The Planning Commission had allowed variance from which we ap-
pealed to certain extent, but allowed only one story building, which would
defeat purpose intended. There was another thing proposed to do, if met with
approval and that is to the easterly line of Lot 2, you will notice by pictures
that there is a heavy concrete wall built out there and in order to comply with
ordinance for side setback, it was plan of Mr. Burce to remove portion of
easterly -most apartment, so would be five -foot setback from easterly line, which
understand would comply with ordinance. Would like to leave present wall as
it now exists, but.not build actual structure out there. Plan to build fence
anyway. Another unusual feature is that there will have to be an overhead
sewer, due to the contour of the ground, which he wishes to keep as near appear-
ing as possible and accordingly would run pipe along wall and if he can leave
existing wall as is, overhead sewer would be concealed as much as possible.
Mayor Selby inquired if overhead sewer would be anchored to wall, and
Mr. Gray answered in affirmative, that it would be on Mr. Burcets side of
fence. Mr. Gray•stated another thing to substantiate position is requiring
20 feet to rear of lot; that they figure this is for parking space and he
pointed out he will have ample parking space., excepting it will be enclosed '
in form of garages. If appeal for variance is granted, it will be of advantage
to City, vacant property will be built upon and more places will be provided
for people to live.
Mayor Selby inquired if it is intention to build opposite present build-
ing on newly acquired property on east side, and Mr. Gray answered in affirma-
tive, that it is proposed to build an additional apartment house there.
-2-
v
Councilman Gordon inquired, how, in view of presently constructed
building across rear on west side, do cars get in and out of that space.
Mr. Burce stated he intends to take 20 feet off new lot to east
for driveway.
Councilman Gordon inquired how much that left to east, and Mr. Burce
stated that would leave 67 feet, and a single unit building only would be
built.
Thereafter, the hereinabove referred to map was filed with the City
Council and marked I'Exhibit 7n.
Mayor Selby then inquired if any other person present desired to
speak in favor of granting the proposed variance. No one responded.
He then inquired if anyone present desired to speak in opposition to
granting requested variance, and the following persons then addressed the
Council:
Mr. William Whistler, residing at 412 West Acacia Avenue, stated he
was against having any two -story building at rear of R -1 lots; feels it
will lower value of property in R -1 area on Acacia; that Mr. Burce had
stated he would put certain type windows so tenants could not see down
into yards, but nevertheless would have a two -story building at rear
which will detract from value of lots; that Mr. Burce indicated unless
apartments are built over garages, he would have too many garages; but if
new apartment house is built to east, there would not be too many garages;
that he understands structure presently being built was built without per-
mit, which he does not believe to be legal.
Mr. F. G. Schilling, residing at 419 West Walnut Avenue, stated that
several of his neighbors had followed action through Planning Commission,
and tried as best they could to check on legal as well as moral aspects of
procedure and it seems like there has been a certain amount of railroading
going on; that it seems as if a very favorable compromise and solution had
been given by Planning Commission in allowing Mr. Burce to use rear 20 feet
in accordance with Planning Commission ruling; that they are quite in ac-
cord with such ruling; that the Planning Commission ruling is very explicit
in what would be allowed, and if not followed would keep that particular
area from developing into a fine R -1 zone.
Mr. Eugene Gaudio, residing at 416 West Acacia Avenue, stated he can
appreciate point in trying to expedite this matter; he feels if the Council
before acting on it, would make a view of the property as it exists, from
his side of-the street and from lots adjacent to it, that it might affect
any ruling the Council would make at this time; that a personal view will
give more to their side than photographs.
Mrs. W. W. Winans stated she owns a lot on Acacia, has had it for
sale for several years. Feels building a two -story building would detract
from value of lot.
No one else indicating a desire to speak in opposition to requested
variance, the Mayor stated he would now give those in favor of such variance
an opportunity to present rebuttal testimony.
Mr. Gray again addressed the Council and stated he might concede some
of thoughts of those objecting to this appeal, but pointed out that the
situation which is apparently being protested, is already in existence;
that you find the same condition elsewhere, where one zone abuts another;
that in this instance the R -3 zone fronts on Imperial and goes half way
through, that if the R -3 zone is put through, it will probably mean more
structures than presently exist and more places for people to live; that
-3-
355
V 356
the first and last gentlemen who spoke live on next street south
and do face the rear of property, but that Mr. Schilling lives on
Walnut Avenue, actually 1J blocks away and cannot see why premises
would be detrimental to his property; that they are not attempting
to railroad anything, but to do everything legal; that everything has
been done according to building specifications; that there is no state
violation. He again urged the Council to allow this variance for bene-
fit of people as a whole; pointed out that marry people who approve of
it live immediately.adjacent to property.
The Mayor inquired if anyone else desired to give rebuttal testi-
mony in favor of the variance. No one responded.
He then inquired if anyone desired to again speak in opposition
to granting such variance.
Mr. Gaudio stated he believes the new structure partially completed
is now on R -1 zone; that they were told by Planning Commission that idea
for new zoning was because that was R -1; that being the case that build-
ing now sits on R -1, and they feel justified in trying to keep it that
way. It was R -1 when Mr. Burce bought it; that Mr. Burce started the
structure and Mr. Gaudio feels Mr. Burce should not have been permitted
to start the structure.
Mr. Schilling stated that he felt neighbors should be allowed some
consideration; although he wanted Mr. Burce to make all money possible;
that he had talked to Mr. Smotony, the Building Inspector, and learned
that building permit had been applied for and denied.
Mrs. Winans stated she believed a matter of principle is involved;
if one person started building without a permit, anyone might do the same;
anyone could start to build anything in any zone and be allowed to go
through.
Mr. Gray asked permission to again speak, which was given by the
Mayor, and he thereupon stated that the matter had been brought up about
Mr. Burce starting to build without permit; that Mr. Burce had been as-
sured by City officials that variance could be obtained, that he had relied
upon representations made to him and spent a great deal of money; that he
had acted in good faith and has followed all channels.
Mayor Selby inquired if he meant Mr. Burce was told by the Building
Inspector that he might go ahead and build without building permit.
Mr. Gray stated that was his understanding, that Mr. Burce had been
assured, because of circumstances surrounding property, variance could be
obtained.
Mr. Clarence M. Burce then addressed the Council and stated he had
gone to the Planning Commission before he ever started building; that it
is not shown in minutes, but he asked in that meeting if he should go
ahead with his loan or cancel it. He was told to go ahead; that property
would be rezoned so he could build two -story building.
Councilman Swanson inquired of Mr. Burce if in his request for variance,
he had asked for variance from R -1 to R -3. x.
Mr. Burce answered yes, that he -had the paper all made out, with
$25.00 to pay for it, and was told would rezone without variance.
Mr. Whistler requested permission to ask a question of Mr. Burce,
which request was granted.
Mr. Whistler then inquired of Mr. Burce if he was denied a building
permit by the Building Inspector.
-4-
V 357
Mr. Burce stated yes, but head of Planning Commission had stated
he would take care of the matter by filing a release with the Building
Inspector within two-or three days; that this was not done, and after
several attempts he had contacted the head of the Planning Commission,
who then stated he +twas not going to stick his neck out", and would not
file the release.
Mayor Selby inquired of Mr. Burce to whom he referred when he
stated t +head of Planning Commissionf', and Mr. Burce stated he referred to
- Mr. Allen.
Councilman Peterson inquired of Mr. Burce if, in his discussions
regarding building permit and on assumption he was going to get one, did
he take into consideration what side and rear yard requirements were if
apartments were built over garages.
Mr. Burce stated yes, he did take it into consideration, the only
violation known of is rear yard because he did not know the long way of
the lot would be the front.
Councilman Peterson inquired if at any time he had shown any City
official or employee a map or plot plan.
Mr. Burce stated yes, such a map and plan of the buildings are on
file in the City Hall.
Councilman Peterson inquired if such plot plan showed 5 -foot clear-
ance between garages and rear of lot.
Mr. Burce stated yes, blueprints are on file as well as the plot -
plan.
Councilman Peterson then stated the picture changes when garages with
living quarters above, instead of just garages, are constructed, and dif-
ferent yard requirements apply.
No other persons desiring to be heard in the matter, the Mayor stated,
if there were no objections, he would declare the hearing closed.
- Thereafter, it was moved by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Council-
man Gordon, that the matter of the appeal of Clarence M. Burce and Caroline
K. Burce from the decision of the Planning Commission as set forth in its
Resolution No. 138, be taken under consideration by this Council until its
next regular meeting to be held April 8th, 1953• Carried by the following
vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Baker, Gordon, Peterson, Swanson and
Mayor Selby;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
written communications, received from the persons, firms. or corpora-
tions, hereinafter named, were read to the Council and were disposed of in.
the manner indicated, following reference to each hereinafter:
LEO B. FREEDMAN, CHIEF, EL SEGUNDO FIRE DEPARTMENT, dated April: 1,
1953, advising that Glenn A. Lanphear has requested an indefinite leave
of absence from his duties as Call Mann in the Fire Department.
Moved by Councilman Gordon, seconded by Councilman Peterson, that
Glenn A. Lanphear be and he is hereby granted an indefinite leave of ab-
sence from his duties as Call Mann--in the E1 Segundo Fire Department.
Carried.
-5-
•
V 358
LEO B. FREEDMAN, CHIEF, EL SEGUNDO FIRE DEPARTMENT, dated March
31, 1953, advising that he has appointed Fireman Dale Newman as
Engineer in the Fire Department, such appointment effective at 8:00
o'clock A.M., April 1, 1953, and requesting that such appointment be
approved.
Moved by Councilman Swanson, seconded by Councilman Baker, that
the reclassification by the Chief of the E1 Segundo Fire Department
of Fireman Dale Newman to Engineer in said Fire Department, be and the
same is hereby ratified, approved and confirmed. Carried. by the fol-
lowing vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Baker, Gordon, Peterson, Swanson and
Mayor Selby;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, dated April 1, 1953,
transmitting therewith copy of its Resolution No. 1399 granting per-
mission to William Watkins to conduct sandblasting operations at 122
Sheldon Street, E1 Segundo, such permit being granted subject to cer-
tain conditions as more specifically set forth in said resolution.
Following discussion by the Council, it was moved by Councilman
Peterson, seconded by Councilman Gordon, that the matter of approving
certain action as taken by the Planning Commission of the City of E1
Segundo-, under its Resolution No. 139, hereinabove referred to, be taken
under consideration by this Council until its next regular meeting to be
held April 8, 1953• Carried.
HOMER ARCHIBALD McALLISTER, dated March 23, 1953, being application
for employment by the City of E1 Segundo. Ordered filed.
JOHN ANSON FORD, CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
dated March 27, 1953, expressing appreciation for the Council's resolu-
tion adopted in connection with the recent death of Supervisor Raymond
V..Darby. Ordered filed.
WILLIAM J. FOX, COUNTY ENGINEER AND SURVEYOR, dated March 26, 1953,
setting forth certain details which he requests the Council take into con-
sideration in connection with acceptance of deeds for street purposes.
It appearing that the City of E1 Segundo is presently complying with
the request of said County Engineer, the communication was ordered filed.
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, dated March
27, 1953, being notice of hearing to be held on Wednesday, May 6, 1953,
in the matter of the application of The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph
Company for authority to increase its rates. By general consent, said
communication was ordered filed for future reference.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. William Doran addressed the Council, inquiring whether or not
the matter of his application for a change of zone "affecting certain proper-
ty southerly of Imperial Highway and westerly of Center Street, would come
before the Council at this meeting.
It appeared that the processing of said matter had only been completed
by the Planning Commission at its last regular meeting held March 30th,
1953, and the Council had not been advised of what action had been taken
by the Commission in the matter.
10
V 359
Mr. Doran explained that he had requested a zone change from
R -1 to C -2 on property presently abutting other C -2 property, but
that the Planning Commission had rezoned such property as R -3 only,
and that he was presently being held up in constructing certain build-
ings on said property until the matter could be definitely settled.
The Council agreed to expedite the hearing all possible, and there-
after, it was moved by Councilman Baker, seconded by Councilman Gordon,
that the City Clerk be and she is hereby authorized to give notice of a
public hearing before the City Council in the matter of the application
of William Doran for a change of zone, affecting certain property south-
erly of Imperial Highway and westerly of Center Street, at the earliest
possible time after receipt of necessary data from the Planning Com-
mission. Carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Baker, Gordon, Peterson, Swanson and
Mayor Selby;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES
- Public Safety Commissioner Swanson.stated the Police Department
is badly in need of space in which to hold its monthly practice shooting
and that a survey of possible locations of such shooting range had been
made by himself, Chief of Police DeBerry and Assistant Chief Vernon Wood;
that such survey discloses that there is available a plot of ground lying
next to the sand hills at the westerly end of Oak Avenue which they feel
would be practical for the purposes inasmuch as the sand hills would form
a safety barrier.
After discussion by the Council, by general consent, the matter was
referred back to Public Safety Commissioner Swanson and the Chief of
Police for administrative handling.
REPORTS OF OFFICERS AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES
The City Clerk made reports as follows:
1. That she had received from the Department of Public Works of
the City of Los Angeles, its invoice No. 13201, indicating an amount due
from the City of El Segundo, under its contract for the construction of
the Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant, of the sum of $688.05, one copy of
which report she delivered to each the City Engineer and City Attorney.
2. That she had received from Southern California Gas Company a
check in the sum of $2,648.42, representing franchise payment for the
-calendar year ended December 31, 1952•
Moved by Councilman Gordon, seconded by Councilman Peterson, the
following resolution be adopted:
WHEREAS, there has been delivered to the City Clerk of
the City of E1 Segundo, from Southern California Gas Company,
said Companytt check in amount of $2,648.42, representing
franchise payment for the calendar year ended December 31,
1952;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the said remittance
from said Company is hereby accepted by the City of El Segundo,
subject to the right of said City to audit the said statement
and the correctness of said amount, and that the City Clerk be
and she is hereby authorized and instructed to deposit said
remittance in the Treasury of said City to the credit of the
General Fund.
mf c
V 360
Carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Baker, Gordon, Peterson, Swanson and
Mayor Selby;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
Director of Public Works Short stated that previously the City of
El Segundo had requested permission from the City of Los Angeles to
place conduit to connect Sewer Plant No. 5 with Sewer Plant No. 1 in a
portion of new Imperial Highway in the City of Los Angeles; that the
City of Los Angeles had reported to him it would look with favor upon
such construction but it required formal application be made with it by
resolution of the City Council addressed to the City Council of the
City of Los Angeles, in order to comply with certain provisions of the
State Code. He further stated that data in connection with such appli-
cation had been given to the City Attorney and proper resolution pre-
pared by said latter official.
It was thereupon moved by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilman
Baker, the following resolution be adopted:
WHEREAS, the City of El Segundo is a municipal corpor-
ation of the sixth class, located in the County of Los Angeles,
State of California; and
WHEREAS, said City of El Segundo owns and operates a
sanitary sewer system within its boundaries; and
WHEREAS, it is essential, in order to properly and
efficiently operate said sanitary sewer system in a manner most
compatible with the public health, safety and welfare, to con-
struct a relief sanitary sewer within a portion of new Imperial
Highway within the City of Los Angeles, a chartered city within
said County, which immediately adjoins said City of El Segundo
on the north; and
WHEREAS, said City of El Segundo's sewer system can not
adequately and conveniently be provided with conduits unless
it constructs and maintains the said relief sanitary sewer
within said City of Los Angeles, hereinabove referred to and
hereinafter described;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
FIRST: Said City Council hereby finds and by this resolu-
tion declares that the location of said City is such that it
can not adequately or conveniently be provided with conduits
unless said City constructs and maintains a certain connecting
conduit (relief sanitary sewer, brick manholes and appurtenances)
as hereinafter described.
SECOND: That the conduit (relief sanitary sewer, brick
manholes and .appurtenances.) proposed to be constructed and main- • '
tained within said City of Los Angeles is described as follows:
8 inch cast iron pipe, 12 inch vitrified clay pipe, brick man-
holes and appurtenances.
THIRD: That the location and description of the said con-
duit (relief sanitary sewer, brick manholes and appurtenances)
and of the public street, in,across and along which the same is
proposed to be constructed and maintained are as follows:
-8-
V 361
In the south shoulder of that portion of new Imperial
Highway within said City of Los Angeles, immediately
adjacent to said City of E1 Segundo on the north, from
a point which is approximately 2600 feet west of the
center line of Sepulveda Boulevard westerly to a junction
with the Los Angeles central outfall sewer, in accordance
with and as shown on Drawing No. 530324, entitled '?IMPER-
IAL HIGHWAY TRUNK LINE SEWER +t, on file in the office of
the City Engineer of the City of E1 Segundo, which is
hereby approved and referred to and by this reference
incorporated herein and made a part hereof.
FOURTH: That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
instructed to transmit to the governing body of the City of Los
Angeles the following: (a) a certified copy of this resolution;
(b) a Certified copy of said Drawing No. 530324; and (c) a written
request signed by said City Clerk that permission be granted to
the City of E1 Segundo by the City of Los Angeles to construct and
maintain within said City of Los Angeles the conduit (relief sani-
tary sewer, brick manholes and appurtenances) described in this
resolution.
On roll call, the foregoing resolution was adopted by the following
vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Baker,
.Mayor Selby;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
Gordon, Peterson, Swanson and
City Attorney Woodworth made reports as follows:
1. That he had approved as to form the bond signed by the American
Cast Iron Pipe Company in connection with contract recently awarded to
it by the City of E1 Segundo.
2. That in accordance with data submitted to him by the Director
of Public Works he had prepared a form of resolution to provide charging
franchised utilities for permits on an area basis, which form of resolu-
tion he delivered to the City Clerk for presentation at the proper time.
3. That pursuant to data received from the Building Inspector, he
had prepared form of ordinance amending the Building Ordinance of the
City of El Segundo to provide for issuance of permits for the construction
of concrete block fences, which ordinance he delivered to the City Clerk
for presentation at the proper time.
4. That the complaint of the City of E1 Segundo in the matter of
condemnation of certain right- of-way of the Pacific Electric Railway
Company was filed in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles on
March 27, 1953•
5. That he has received from the City of Pasadena its budget in
connection with proposed joint protest against requested increase of rates
by The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, together with form of
resolution which said City of Pasadena requested the City of E1 Segundo
adopt in event the'City is interested in such participation.
Discussion ensued by the Council, following which it was moved by
Councilman Gordon, seconded by Councilman Peterson, the following reso-
lution be adopted:
RESOLVED, that the City Attorney be and he is hereby
authorized to notify the City of Pasadena that the City of
V 362
El Segundo will join with other cities which desire to
participate in common defense in the case of The Pacific
Telephone and Telegraph Company Application No. 33935, for
rate increase now pending before the Public Utilities Com-
mission, on the basis of the budget and plan as forwarded
to various cities by the said City Attorney of the City of
Pasadena; provided, however, that in no case shall the
contribution of the City of El Segundo for such purpose
exceed the sum of $200.00.
On roll call, the foregoing resolution was adopted by the following
vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Baker, Gordon, Peterson, Swanson and
Mayor Selby;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Moved by Councilman Baker, seconded by Councilman Gordon, the fol-
lowing resolution be adopted:
WHEREAS, this City Council did heretofore by resolution
duly and regularly adopted on the 23rd day of July, 1952,
authorize the collection from the holders of franchises granted
by said City of inspection, engineering, clerical and incidental
costs and expenses incurred by said City in connection with the
issuance of permits to such permittees and in the inspection and
processing of the work thereunder; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works of the City has sub-
mitted to this Council for its approval a schedule showing sug-
gested fees applicable to certain such work to be performed under
such permits; and
WHEREAS, this Council has reviewed the said schedule and
desires to approve the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:
FIRST: That the following schedule of fees and charges to
be collected and made in connection with the work therein re-
ferred to shall be and the same is hereby approved and adopted:
"ASPHALTIC PAVEMENT WITH SEAL COAT (Asphaltic pavements include oil
and gravel, rock and oil, macadam, premix, asphaltic concrete,
asphalt, warrenite, willite -and similar surfaces)
AREA IN SQUARE FEET
THICK-
NESS 5 -20 21 -50 51 -150 151 -500 501 -1000 1001 -2000 2001 -5000 5001 - 100000
311 and $.80 $ .65 $ .50 $ +35 $'.20 $ .20 $ .20 $ .20
less
Of .90 .75 .60 .45 .30 .27 .25 .25
61, 1.00 .85 .70 .50 .35 .30 .30 .30 it.
(Prices listed above are unit prices per square foot)
Paving and roadway repairs other than those listed above will be
charged on a basis of actual costs to the City, plus 7% for admin-
istration and overhead.
SECOND: That the Street Superintendent is hereby authorized
-30=
and instructed to charge such franchise holders for the
issuance of permits and subsequent inspection as above
indicated, the fees and charges prescribed in the fore-
going schedule for the classes of work therein referred
to.
THIRD: That this resolution shall take effect im-
mediately.
On roll call, the foregoing resolution was adopted by the following
vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Baker,
Mayor Selby;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
Gordon, Peterson, Swanson and
Councilman Baker introduced Ordinance No. 422, entitled:
which was read.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 362 OF SAID CITY AND THE
«BUILDING CODE" THEREIN ADOPTED BY AMENDING PARA-
GRAPH 't(a) PERMITS REQUIREDtt OF SECTION 301 OF SAID
CODE.,
PAYING BILLS
The following demands, having Y
Finance and Records, were read:
General Fund
Mrs. Annabell O'Leary 1.00
Gordon Whitnall 100.00
Mort Brandler 60.00
Lelah Converse 50.00
Lennox Disposal Service 2,742.45
El Segundo Chamber of
Commerce
The Todd Company
Anderson & Janssen
John W. Hauser
Wm. R. Selby
Kelly Pipe Company
Carburetor & Electric Supply
C. V. Baird Auto Supply
Cooper Wood Products
California Rent Car
Western Union
Pacific Clay Products
Brown- Bevis- Industrial
Equipment Co.
Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
City of E. S. Water Dept.
E1 Segundo Herald
Brown- Bevis - Industrial
50.00
298.08
24.00
74.50
6.80
21.82
9.53
11.90
30.59
370.00
2.43
250.82
9.27
4.87
51.00
362.02
Equipment Co. 13.39
So. Calif. Disinfecting Co. 69.70
E1 Segundo Paint Center 3.54,
Anierican Bldg. Maintenance 33.00
Title Ins. & Trust Co. 43.25
Victor Equipment Co. 108.46
Yoakum's Cafe 2.30
A & M Grill 6.50
TOTAL 4,811.22
►ad the approval of the Committee on
Recreation Fund
Ruth Hopp, City Treasurer 731.38
it it it ti 130.40
Minta Curtzwiler, Secretary
El Segundo City Group 11.30
Hospital Service of
Southern California 5.05
State Employees'
Retirement System 17.12
TOTAL 895.25
Water Works Fund
Brown -Bevis Industrial
Equipment Co. 45.84
Morgan & Son 10.30
California Pencil Co. 4.89
Wilson's Carbon Co., Ltd. 19.06
Braun Corporation 32.96
Smith - Blair, Inc. 73.48
Donald R. Short, Petty Cash 29.11
TOTAL $ 215.64
Water Works Bond
Election 1948,
Construction Fund
E1 Segundo Herald 6 40-31
TOTAL 40.31
Traffic Safety Fund
Automobile Club of
Southern California 30.65
TOTAL 30. 5
Moved by Councilman Gordon, seconded by Councilman Peterson, the
_11-
V 363
V 364
demands be allowed and warrants ordered drawn on and paid out of the
respective funds covering the same. Carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Baker, Gordon, Peterson, Swanson and
Mayor Selby;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
NEW BUSINESS
The City Clerk advised that the American Cast Iron Pipe Company had
furnished bond in the sum of $9,300.00 with the United States Guarantee
Company as Surety, in connection with the contract recently awarded said
Company for furnishing certain Cast Iron Pipe to the City of El Segundo;
that said form of bond had been approved by the City Attorney as to form
and by the Mayor as to Surety, and it would now be in order for the City
Council to approve said bond.
Moved by Councilman Baker, seconded by Councilman Swanson, the
following resolution be adopted:
RESOLVED, that the Faithful Performance Bond, dated the
31st day of March, 1953, with American Cast Iron Pipe Company
of Los Angeles, California, as principal, and United States
Guarantee Company, a New York corporation, as surety, be ap-
proved by this Council, and that the City Clerk be and she is
hereby authorized and instructed to endorse evidence of this
approval upon said bond.
On roll call, the foregoing resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Baker, Gordon, Peterson, Swanson and
Mayor Selby;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
No further business appearing to be transacted at this meeting, it
was moved by Councilman Baker, seconded by Councilman Gordon, the meeting
adjourn. Carried.
Approved:
Mayor
12-
Respectfully submitted,
- L
Neva M. Elsey, City Cle k