2025-01-23 Planning Commission MinutesMINUTES OF THE
EL SEGUNDO PLANNING COMMISSION
Regularly Scheduled Meeting
January 23, 2025
Chair Hoeschler called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Hoeschler
Present: Vice Chair Maggay
Present: Commissioner Inga
Present: Commissioner Christian
Also present: Michael Allen, AICP, Community Development Director
Also present: Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Planning Manager
Also present: Joaquin Vazquez, City Attorney
Also present: Paul Samaras, AICP, Principal Planner
Also present: Jazmin Farias, Assistant Planner
Also present: Jillian Glickman, Consultant from RSG Inc.
Also present: Jim Simon, Consultant from RSG Inc.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chair Hoeschler led the pledge.
PUBLIC/WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.
A. CONSENT
1. Approval of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes:
• December 12, 2024
• January 9, 2025
MOTION: Approve the minutes.
Moved by Commissioner Inga, second by Commissioner Christian.
Motion carried, 4-0, by the following vote:
Ayes: Hoeschler, Maggay, Inga, and Christian
1
B. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
C. NEW BUSINESS
2. Affordable Housing Strategic Plan Study Session
Community Development Director Michael Allen introduced Jim Simon and Jillian
Glickman from RSG consultants who are providing on -call housing consulting
services to the city. Michael informed the Commission that RSG is collaborating
with staff to support affordable housing in alignment with the goals outlined in the
Council -adopted 2022 Affordable Housing Strategic Plan. Jim and Jillian
proceeded to lead the study session in which they presented potential funding
opportunities identified to date to help subsidize the costs of affordable housing
development and presented considerations for the development of an affordable
housing local preference policy to further support the City's housing objectives.
• Vice Chair Maggay inquired if the city is required to obtain additional
revenue. Jim advised that the city is not required to do so but it is necessary
if the city wants to partake in SCAG and HCD programs they are qualified
for. Michael added that the ripple effect of positive benefits that can come
out of a continuous stream result in a lot of other things we can do to reach
HCD requirements.
• Commissioners asked staff to clarify what displacement risk is. Jillian
explained that when new development comes in price of housing rises
which limits the ability for tenants within a certain unit to mobilize and move
to a different unit because rent is rising which causes tenants to move
outside the city for rent that is comparable to what they were paying before.
• Commissioner Christian inquired why El Segundo is considered to have a
low estimated renter displacement risk. Jim stated that based on the
research there is a proportionately mush smaller portion of the city's
population that would be impacted by displacement due to the
demographics of the community. Michael added that based on the data
that was pulled essentially in El Segundo it is possible for renters in the city
to find other expensive housing in the same price range and this could
always change based on the development cycle that is being used.
Commissioner Christian added that the formula seems complicated
because it is only being focused on renter displacement due to new
development because the city is constrained on how much new
development is out there.
• Jim explained that the urban displacement project data comes from social
economic data, real estate market data and development trends and
activities. They take this data and identify areas that are more susceptible
to displacement and less susceptible to displacement. He added that he
will provide a summary of that data and share it with staff so that it can be
2
passed down to the Commissioners.
• Chair Hoeschler inquired if RSG recommends for the city to take on the
role of managing affordable housing units or if it is best to select a
management company for that role. Jim stated that for a city of this size
and the amount of units it would have he does not believe taking on that
role would be a good use of the city's resources.
• Chair Hoeschler inquired how people find out if they are eligible or a
candidate for affordable housing. Jim advised that if you bring on an
affordable housing developer for a 100% affordable housing development,
they will out that out there and they will have events like fairs to invite
people to submit applications. He added that when the city engages with
other affordable housing developers those are the types of things that are
embedded into any affordable housing agreement which spells out what
that marketing plan is going to be and how it is going to be fair; often they
recommend the use of a lottery system.
• Commissioner Christian inquired if there is a system that gives priority to
certain kinds of workers like teachers, police, fire fighters, city employees
as those are the type of groups of people he thinks of first that he would
like to see live here. Vice Chair Maggay chimed in and added that he would
like to have tiers of employment depending on what they do for the city and
location of employment as he prefers to have people that live and work in
the city to reduce vehicle miles traveled. He would like to see tiers of their
employment and their housing and what they do as a job. Jim advised that
they have worked with cities that are redeveloping their property and
because the land is theirs, they have some special ability to target teachers
for example. He assured the commissioners that there are some
opportunities to do that.
• Commissioner Christian inquired if there is technology that can help
administer the managing of these applications and a way to push out
notifications so that a new department does not have to be created. Jim
said that there is but he thinks the bigger issue is that when someone
applies for that list how much information is going to be requested upfront
and how often will that information be maintained as it can fluctuate. The
burden is updating the information and it really depends on the amount of
units being administered. It comes down to how much the city wants to
spend on administration to justify that work.
Vice Chair Hoeschler invited the public to share comments regarding the
study session. Further communication came from the public.
• Resident John Pickhaver stated that he was present on behalf of Sea
Change who cares a lot about affordable housing. He shared that when he
was looking for information regarding rent cost based on his current
situation the next closest one was $700 more than what he pays now. He
referenced page 8 of the staff report which included a community survey
that included a question that asked what areas the community would like
3
to see new housing in. He pointed out that the staff report leaves out the
highest selected answer which was housing East of Pacific Coast Highway
(PCH). Although there was only one option for East of PCH awhile the other
four options were all West of PCH in the survey he thinks it would be
interesting to break that down and if staff were to parcel out spots East of
PCH would that continue to rank higher than those. He is not sure why this
information was left out but is aware that the scope is limited and is asking
that whatever power the Commission has to make a recommendation to
just engage the community more on this issue and see if they can expand
the scope because there is a lot of work going into this right now and it is
all being pushed to one side of the city which seems impossible to hit.
Lastly, he reiterated that he was present at the meeting to remind the
Commissioners that there are residents who wish to see housing East of
PCH and wants to encourage them to see if the scope can be enlarged to
look at all the options.
Vice Chair Hoeschler invited the public to share comments regarding the
study session. Further communication came from the public. Further
communication came from the Commission.
• Chair Hoeschler inquired if the housing type property they recommend for
affordable housing almost always a rental unit versus a for sale unit. Jim
stated that they would not say recommending because his business
partner feels the same way as they know we need to create community
wealth and ownership is a key element to that. He added that unfortunately
there are a few subsidies for ownership affordable housing as it is
extremely difficult to do, and it is specifically difficult to that at the lowest
income levels as you would need HOA's to take care of common area
maintenance and that might be all they can afford to pay.
• Chair Hoeschler inquired if the developers that create these types of
projects are typically very much in the affordable housing space or can a
regular market rate developer become an expert at this with proper
guidance. Jim shared that up until three years ago it was much more the
domain of affordable housing developers and when market rate
construction started to slow down as market rate projects became more
infeasible, he has seen many market rate affordable apartment developers
want to participate. He has advised them that they need to find a partner,
a property manager, and an investor.
• Vice Chair Maggay inquired what the typical minimum number of units to
apply if they do 15%. Jim shared that the minimum project size for
affordable housing development you typically see is in the range of 50 to
100 units.
• Vice Chair Maggay inquired if RSG has examples of reoccurring revenue
generating programs and if the $5 million dollars the city has be able to be
the starting point for that. Jim stated that for the most part they have a few
options such as a trust fund which would require some sort of tax
4
mechanism or some other voluntary ongoing contribution of people's
general funds. Another option would be a tax increase, he added that some
states started exploring that on a regional basis. A third option is what they
call a commercial linkage or an inclusionary housing in lieu fee; however,
both options require for development to keep happening to generate those
dollars. Another option would be sort of a community benefit approach
where you do a development agreement, and you negotiate a community
benefit.
• Vice Chair Maggay stated that 15% is a good number and he would like
the units to target preferred renters.
• Commissioner Christian stated that he would like to see a longer time limit
or a way to continue to cycle through. Jim stated that it is something that
can be embedded in a development agreement and the administrative
burden is placed on them. Michael added that that is all part of the
development agreement negotiations. He provided the example of Culver
City which has 12 to 15 staff members including part-timers that administer,
audit, monitor, and they also engage in development agreement where the
burden is on the developer.
• Chair Hoeschler inquired how these units are subsidized and what
encourages a developer to give up some market rate units in order to do
affordable units. Jim stated that the study session has mostly covered
100% of affordable projects but if we are talking about projects that are a
mix of that there is state law that says they can do that, and it is called
density bonus; the motivation is more units gets more income.
• Chair Hoeschler stated that it is hard to understand how to increase density
in this town when you are landlocked and that he understands East of PCH
is not zoned for residential but finds it hard to have this conversation
without talking about East of PCH and wonders why the staff report did not
address that community input. Michael stated that he was not here when
that survey occurred so he cannot speak of the methodology or validity or
invalidity of the survey. He added that he is not agnostic towards the fact
that there are several opinions on where housing should be built and
clarified that the Affordable Housing Strategic Plan does not address where
to build housing rather it is a guide for us to develop policy so that when
housing is built regardless of where it is at there is a policy in place to
facilitate the production of affordable housing. One of the goals identified
was a focus area program and when developing the strategic plan or at
least finalizing the document we could only do so where housing is
currently permitted today. He can only imagine that naturally that
conversation will happen, and it needs to happen at a time when land use
is being updated and housing is a land use. Michael also reminded the
Commissioners that a land use element update is coming down the
pipeline and that would be the adequate time to address where to build
housing as that project would have public hearings, study sessions and
workshops for the public to provide feedback in person.
• Commissioner Inga provided consensus regarding the 15% threshold.
5
MOTION: Receive and file study session.
D. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
E. REPORTS — COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE
• Michael provided an update regarding the Land Use Element update and shared
that the selection of the consulting team will occur in the second City Council
meeting in February.
• Planning Manager Eduardo Schonborn reminded the Commissioners to complete
the 700 form and informed them that the fines for not completing them will be
going to them individually and no longer the city.
F. REPORTS — PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
• Chair Hoeschler shared that he will be stepping down from the Planning
Commission as his wife and him will be moving to San Luis Obispo and stated
that this would be his last meeting.
• Commissioners and staff thanked Chair Hoeschler for his service, congratulated
him, and wished him well.
G. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney Joaquin Vazquez thanked Chair Hoeschler for his service and wished
him well.
ADJOURNMENT — the meeting adjourned at 7:22 p.m.
The next meeting is scheduled for February 13, 2025, at 5:30 p.m.
Michael Allen, Community Development Director
Jay Hoeschler, Planning Commission Chair
C: