Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
2024-09-17 CC Agenda - Public Communication - Misc. - Maple Ave & Main St2024-09-17 AGENDA
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION - MISC. - MAPLE AVE & MAIN ST.
From: Melissa McCaverty <melissamccaverty@yahoo.com>
Date: September 9, 2024 at 2:14:53 PM PDT
To: "Sassoon, Elias" <esassoon@elsegundo.org>
Cc: "George, Darrell" <dgeorge@elsegundo.org>, ALL ELECTED OFFICIALS
<ALLELECTEDOFFICIALS@elsegundo.org>
Subject: Re: Maple Ave & Main St. - Dangerous Intersection
Hi Elias,
I just noticed last night that the pedestrian crossing sign attached to the yellow pole on the north side of
maple and main was knocked over .... AGAIN. It seems to get knocked over at least once a week, indicating
vehicles are hitting it.
I also was almost t-boned yet again at this intersection just last week. And the strange part of that person
running the stop sign was they were heading northbound. Usually, the people I see run the stop sign are
heading southbound on Main Street towards downtown. This man was coming from downtown towards
Imperial.
I know have a 15-year-old daughter with a permit. She saw firsthand how dangerous this intersection is.
I am just following up to see if you've ever had the meeting you sent me in the email you sent me back in May
2022. I distinctly remember what prompted that email as I was trembling after narrowly escaping being t-
boned by somebody who completely ran the stop sign that day.
As you are aware, Government Code Section 835 states:
Except as provided by statute, a public entity is liable for injury caused by a dangerous condition
of its property if the plaintiff establishes that the property was in a dangerous condition at the
time of the injury, that the injury was proximately caused by the dangerous condition, that the
dangerous condition created a reasonably foreseeable risk of the kind of injury which was
incurred, and that either:
(a) A negligent or wrongful act or omission of an employee of the public entity within the
scope of his employment created the dangerous condition; or(b) The public entity had
actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition under Section 835.2 a sufficient
time prior to the injury to have taken measures to protect against the dangerous
condition.
I am writing this email with the intension to put the City of El Segundo on notice that this intersection is a
dangerous condition.
I want my email to document so that should something ever occur at this intersection, which sadly, I believe is
inevitable, the City will be liable for any injuries and cannot claim it did not have actual or constructive notice,
as I am informing you, for not the first time, that this intersection is dangerous.
Please advise.
Thank you,
Melissa McCaverty
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 01:18:07 PM PDT, Xu, Lifan <Ixu@elsegundo.org> wrote:
Hi Melissa,
I don't have a date for the traffic committee meeting yet, but it will be in late June. If I understand your
request correctly, you are requesting to turn the current 4-way stop sign intersection at Main St. and
Maple Ave. to a traffic light controlled intersection. A traffic signal warrant analysis must be conducted
first to validate the request before any action can be taken. Similar requests have been looked at in the
past by the traffic committee, and related traffic study had been conducted previously and the study
showed that additional traffic control at the intersection is unwarranted. See attached Dec-18, 2018 staff
report for the Traffic Analysis on Main St. From El Segundo Blvd. to Imperial Ave.
The Traffic Committee is technical in nature and not open to the public. For the traffic committee agenda
item related to you request, the recommendation is to do an update on the traffic study since the last one
has been a few years old and the recommendation is expected to be approved. Then the traffic study will
be updated over the summer and we can provide you with the findings.
Thanks,
Lifan Xu, P.E.
City Engineer
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street, E1 Segundo, CA 90245
(310) 524-2368
From: Melissa McCaverty <melissamccaverty@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2022 6:02 PM
To: Sassoon, Elias <esassoon@elsegundo.org>
Cc: George, Darrell <dgeorge@elsegundo.org>; Xu, Lifan <Ixu@elsegundo.org>; Boyles,Drew (Mayor)
<dboyles@elsegundo.org>
Subject: Re: Maple Ave & Main St. - Dangerous Intersection
Any update on this meeting!
Sent from my Phone
On May 5, 2022, at 11:26 AM, Melissa McCaverty <me!issamccaverty ar7yahoo.com> wrote:
M. Sassoon,
Thank you for your quick response, I do appreciate it.
M. Xu please advise when and where the meeting will be as I most likely would like to attend
Melissa
Sent from my iPhone
On May 5, 2022, at 11:15 AM, Sassoon, Elias <esassoon(d-)elsegundo orq> wrote:
Good Morning M. McCaverty:
Thanks for reaching out to us
This request will be on the Traffic Committee agenda for the upcoming meeting which is going to be
scheduled shortly. The City Engineer (Lifan Xu, copied on this email) will be scheduling this meeting
Please stay in touch with him.
Lifan: Pls let Ms. McCaverty know when and where the meeting will be held
Regards.
Elias Sassoon, Director
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO I Public Works Dept.
350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA 90245
(310) 524-2356
On May 4, 2022, at 17:31, Melissa McCaverty <melissamccavertyCaDyahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Mayor Boyles,
I am writing to you to formally request a stoplight be put in at the intersection of Main Street & Maple
Avenue.
This afternoon, I was heading eastbound on Maple Ave & completely stopped at the intersection. Looked
both ways & began to enter. Thank God, I was traveling slowly because a woman in a green Toyota
Corolla blew through the intersection going at least 30 mph heading southbound on Main.
was able to avoid getting hit by her because I slammed my brakes and honked in time. I truly believe
she had no idea there was a stop sign there despite the warning signs and lights coming off of imperial.
She was looking down, what appeared to be on her phone to me.
For the past several months, I have noticed that the sign on the orange warning pillar in the center of the
intersection on Main Street keeps getting knocked down. Obviously people are running into it. There was
most recently a bad accident there within the last month.
Had this woman hit me at that speed, I have no doubt I would have been seriously injured as she would
have hit my driver side. I am so grateful to have avoided the collision, just barely. Please let me know
what I can do to help advocate for a stoplight at this intersection.
I have seen police officers on motorcycles sitting there, but I have to believe there is a better use of our
resources for them. What are the odds are actually going to catch somebody blowing through the
intersection? And what does it matter if there is a police officer there if the person doesn't stop and kills
somebody, which could very easily happen. Seems to me that a police officer here is not really a
deterrent, as I think that most residents understand there is a stop sign there. The real danger is the
people who don't even put their brakes on and just run the stop sign.
Additionally there is a huge back up at the stop sign at various times of the morning. A stoplight seems to
be the logical solution to go save money, resources and lives.
Thank you,
Melissa McCaverty
231 W. Maple Ave
El Segundo, CA
<image003.jpg>
<image004Jpg>
<image005.png>
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: December 18, 2018
AGENDA ITEM STATEMENT AGENDA HEADING: Special Order of Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action to (1) receive and file a report from Public Works on the Downtown
Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Study, and (2) provide staff direction on follow up actions. (Fiscal Impact:
$26,000 est)
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1. Receive and file a report from Public Works related to the Downtown Traffic and Pedestrian
Safety Study; and,
2. Provide staff direction on follow up actions; or,
3. Alternatively, take other action related to this item.
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Study for Main Street, Grand Avenue, and Mariposa Avenue
Appendix B — Collision Data — El Segundo Police Department
FISCAL IMPACT: Yes
Amount Budgeted: None
Additional Appropriation: $26,000
Account Number(s):
STRATEGIC PLAN.,
Goal: 4 Develop Quality Infrastructure and Technology
Objective: (a) El Segundo's physical infrastructure supports an appealing, safe, and
effective City_
PREPARED BY: Ken Berkman. Director of Public WorksY�
Bill Whalen, Chief of Police
APPROVED BY: Greg Carpenter, City Manager,
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
As part of the Strategic Planning sessions, the City Council requested staffto analyze and report back on
the downtown area's roadway user safety. Specifically, the roadways to be analyzed were:
• Main Street from El Segundo Boulevard to Imperial Avenue
• Grand Avenue from Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) to Loma Vista Street
• Mariposa Avenue from PCH to Main Street
Public Works executed an agreement with traffic engineering consultant firm Garland Associates to
complete the work. The field investigations were completed in May and June of this year, and the data
and the attached report were reviewed by the Public Works Director and Police Department/Traffic
Division personnel.
W,
24
Overview
According to the Master Plan of Streets in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, Main
Street is designated as a Four -Lane Collector between Imperial Avenue and Grand Avenue, and as a
Secondary Arterial between Grand Avenue and El Segundo Boulevard. Grand Avenue is designated as
a Secondary Arterial and Mariposa Avenue is designated as a Two -Lane Collector.
The speed limits on the three streets in the study area are as follows:
• Main Street — 25 miles per hour (mph)
• Grand Avenue — 25 mph from Loma Vista Street to Eucalyptus Drive and 35 mph from
Eucalyptus Drive to PCH
• Mariposa Avenue — 25 mph
The tasks that were conducted for the analysis are as follows:
• Speed surveys were conducted at three locations on each of the three streets for the AM peak
period, mid -day conditions, and the PM peak period.
• Pedestrian counts were taken at several locations on each of the three streets during the AM and
PM peak periods.
• Collision statistics that were provided by the El Segundo Police Department were reviewed and
analyzed.
• Safety issues were identified and potential measures were developed that could be implemented
to improve safety problems on the three study area streets.
Vehicle Speed Surveys
Speed surveys were conducted at three locations on each of the three study area streets to quantify the
typical travel speeds during the AM peak hour, the mid -day time period, and the PM peak hour. The
vehicle speeds were measured with a radar speed meter from inside an inconspicuous private vehicle in
May and June, 2018, on days when schools were in session. The nine survey locations that were
selected represent segments of the streets that are relatively unaffected by traffic signals and stop signs
so that the vehicles were in a free flow operation. Samples of 100 vehicles were surveyed at each
location (50 vehicles in each direction).
The critical value that is typically used for analyzing vehicle speed data and setting speed limits is the
85'' percentile speed, which is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. Table 1
of the report shows the 85 h percentile speeds that were observed at each monitoring location for the AM
peak hour, mid -day time period, and PM peak hour.
25
TABLE 1
VEHICLE SPEED DATA — 85TH PERCENTILE SPEEDS
Speed
85" Percentile Speed (mph)
AM Peak
Mid -Day
PM Peak
Street/Location
Limit
Hour
Hour
Main Street
Between Imperial Avenue & Maple Avenue
25
30
32
32
Between Palm Avenue & Mariposa Avenue
25
27
31
30
Between Hollv Avenue & Grand Avenue
1 25
28
1 29
29
Grand Avenue
Between Virginia Street & Concord Street
25
26
27
27
Between Eucalyptus Drive & Lomita Street
35
37
39
40
Between Kansas Street & Pacific Coast Hwv
35 1
39
40
1 40
Mariposa Avenue
_
Between Main Street & Sheldon Street
25
26
27
27
Between Sheldon Street & Center Street
25
29
30
31
Between California Street & Washington St
25
30
31
32
Note: AM peak hour is 7:00 to 8:00, mid -day is 10:00 to 11:00, and PM peak hour is 5:00 to 6:00.
Table 1 indicates that the 85th percentile speeds on these three streets are generally higher thanthe speed
limit by values that range from one mph over the speed limit (Mariposa Avenue between Main Street
and Sheldon Street) to 7 mph over the speed limit (Main Street between Imperial Avenue and Maple
Street and Mariposa Avenue between California Street and Washington Street). Speed limits are set to
the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85'h percentile speed, and can be set one 5 mph increment lower than
that value if certain field criteria are met such as decreased sight distances or roadway geometry.
Given these facts, it can be concluded that the speed limits are set appropriately and are enforceable by
the Police Department. However, the speed data were also reviewed to identify the 961, to 1001,
percentile speeds. These are the travel speeds that were observed for the highest five percent of the
vehicles that were surveyed. The locations with the most blatant abuse of speed (i.e., speeds that are at
least 20 mph above the speed limit) are Grand Avenue between Kansas Street and PCH, which had a car
traveling 55 mph in a 35 mph speed zone, and Mariposa Avenue between California Street and
Washington Street, which had a car traveling 48 mph in a 25 mph speed zone. In addition, Main Street
between Imperial Avenue and Maple Avenue, Grand Avenue between Eucalyptus Drive and Lomita
Street, and Mariposa Avenue between Sheldon Street and Center Street had vehicles traveling 19 mph
over the speed limit.
These 96t' to 100`h percentile motorists are the ones that are observed as "excessive speeders" and are
generally the cause of the safety issues associated with speeding vehicles.
Pedestrian Crossing Counts
Pedestrian counts were taken at three to four locations on each of the three study area streets to quantify
the number of pedestrians crossing the street during the AM and PM peak periods. The pedestrian
crossings were monitored in May and June, 2018, on days when schools were in session. The PM peak
hour for the locations near schools represented the afternoon dismissal times (i.e., 2:30 to 3:30 PM),
while the PM peak hour for the non -school locations represented the afternoon commuter peak (i.e.,
5:00 to 6:00 PM).
C:
The survey locations that were selected are generally locations where pedestrians cross the street
without the benefit of a traffic signal or multi -way stop signs. The exceptions are the Grand
Avenue/Center Street and Mariposa Avenue/Center Street intersections, which have 4-way stop signs.
These two intersections were monitored because they are near the Center Street Elementary School and
the El Segundo Middle School.
Table 3 in the report (see attachment) indicates that the locations with a relatively high concentration of
pedestrian crossings are Main Street at Oak Avenue (near El Segundo High School), Main Street
between Holly Avenue and Grand Avenue (a midblock crosswalk at City Hall), Grand Avenue at Arena
Street (near a skate park and teen center), Grand Avenue at Center Street (near El Segundo Middle
School), Mariposa Avenue at Standard Street (at El Segundo High School), and Mariposa Avenue at
Center Street (near Center Street Elementary School).
The Main Street/Oak Avenue, Main Street/City Hall, Grand Avenue/Arena Street, and Mariposa
Avenue/Standard Street locations have uncontrolled crosswalks where the pedestrians do not have the
benefit of a stop sign or traffic signal to facilitate the crossing movements. However, the 100 to 400
blocks of Main Street have the new pedestrian -activated lighting in the crosswalks.
Collision Statistics
Collision statistics were provided by the El Segundo Police Department for the three study area street
segments. The data represent the reported collisions for the time period extending from January 2014 to
mid -June 2018.
A summary of the collision data is provided in Table 4 of the report (see attachment), which shows the
total number of collisions, the number of pedestrian -related collisions, the number of collisions
involving bicycles, and the collisions resulting in a fatality. The collision statistics are provided for
three segments each for the three study area streets.
There were 89 reported collisions on Main Street during the 4'/z-year time period, which includes two
pedestrian -related incidents. On Grand Avenue, there were 63 reported collisions, including two
pedestrian -related incidents and two incidents involving bicycles. On Mariposa Avenue, there were 50
collisions, which includes four pedestrian -related incidents and one incident involving a bicycle. There
were no collisions resulting in a fatality.
Overall, the segment of Main Street with the highest number of collisions is the southern segment
between Pine Avenue and El Segundo Boulevard, which had 39 reported collisions. The segment of
Grand Avenue with the highest number of collisions is the middle segment between Main Street and
Center Street, which had 32 reported collisions. The segment of Mariposa Avenue with the highest
number of collisions is the eastern end between Center Street and PCH, which had 26 reported
collisions. The locations of the collisions involving pedestrians and bicycles are provided below.
An overview of the reported collisions was conducted to determine if any of these streets would be
considered as high -accident locations. This was accomplished by calculating the annual average
number of collisions per million vehicle -miles of travel for each street, which is a standard measurement
for collision statistics. The calculations were conducted by using the number of collisions, the time
period addressed (4.5 years), the length of the street segments, and the average daily traffic volumes on
each street. The results are: Main Street: 3.37 collisions per million vehicle -miles of travel: Grand
Avenue: 3.60 collisions per million vehicle -miles of travel; and Mariposa Avenue: 5.14 collisions per
million vehicle -miles of travel.
27
This level of collision experience is not indicative of a severe safety issue as the values represent the
number of collisions per million miles of travel.
Another measure that is typically used to identify high collision locations is the threshold of five
accidents per year at a single location. A review of the Police Department's collision statistics indicates
that there are no locations on the three study area streets where five or more accidents have been
reported within a one-year period.
It is concluded, therefore, that the collision history on the three roadway segments is not indicative of a
critical safety problem.
Summary of Findings and Recommendations
While the comprehensive review of the study area street segments data indicate that there are no
roadway user safety issues that require actual changes to the roadways' design, speed limits, or right-of-
way control devices such as stop signs or traffic signals, there are several focus areas at which traffic
and pedestrian safety can be improved to maintain the City's high standards regarding public health and
safety.
For purposes of this study, focus areas are defined as locations where one or more ofthe analysis criteria
were observed to be excessive relative to pedestrian concentrations and/or collision history. The focus
areas that were identified based on this methodology are listed in Table 5 of the report (see attachment)
and include:
• Main Street at Oak Avenue
• Main Street from Holly Avenue to Grand Avenue
• Grand Avenue from Arena Street to Sheldon Street
• Grand Avenue from Illinois Street to Indiana Street
• Mariposa Avenue from Main Street to Eucalyptus Drive
Recommended improvements are outlined in Table 6:
TABLE 6 - PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
Locations
Recommended Improvements
Main Street at Oak Avenue
Install high visibility ladder crosswalks at the Main
Street/Oak Avenue intersection and flashing beacons
on top of crosswalk warning sig Lis on Main Street
Main Street from Holly Avenue to
None. The City of El Segundo has already installed
Grand Avenue
in -pavement lights at the crosswalk
Grand Avenue from Arena Street to
Install high visibility ladder crosswalks and flashing
Sheldon Street
beacons on top of the crosswalk warning signs at the
Arena Street and Sheldon Street crosswalks. Install
vehiclespeed feedback signs on Grand Avenue,
Grand Avenue from Illinois Street to
Install vehicle speed feedback signs on Grand Avenue
Indiana Street
Mariposa Avenue from Main Street to
I
Install high visibility ladder crosswalks at the
Eucalyptus Drive
Mariposa Avenue/Standard Street intersection.
28
With regard to stop signs, the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices states that stop
signs should not be used for speed control. The objective of a stop sign is to establish right-of-way
priorities for motorists. Stop signs should be installed only if they are shown to be needed by a warrant
analysis.
As a result of this study, there are no locations that have been deemed to require a warrant analysis for
additional stop signs.
Field Implementation Measures
Main Street at Oak Avenue —high visibility ladder crosswalks have been installed. New solar -lighted,
pedestrian -activated crosswalk signage will be installed by City crews once the signage is procured.
Grand Avenue from Arena Street to Sheldon Street - high visibility ladder crosswalks have been
installed. New solar -lighted, pedestrian -activated crosswalk signage will be installed at Arena Street by
City crews once the signage is procured. The lights in the crosswalk at Sheldon Street are in the process
of being repaired by the business owner that installed them, after which the Public Works Department
will take over for maintenance purposes. Staff is in the process of procuring two mobile vehicle speed
feedback signs, one of which will be deployed on Grand Avenue at various locations from Arena to
Indiana Streets.
Mariposa Avenue from Main Street to Eucalyptus Drive - high visibility ladder crosswalks have been
installed by the current paving contractor.
29
TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY STUDY FOR
MAIN STREET, GRAND AVENUE, AND MARIPOSA AVENUE
ELSEGUNDO
Prepared for
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
Prepared by
GARLAND ASSOCIATES
16787 Beach Boulevard, Suite 234
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
714-330-8984
OCTOBER 2018
011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Introduction and Project Description
1I. Vehicle Speed Surveys
III. Pedestrian Crossing Counts
IV. Collision Statistics
V. Summary of Findings and Recommendations
Appendix A — Figures
Appendix B — Collision Data from El Segundo Police Department
31
LIST OF TABLES
Page
1. Vehicle Speed Data — 85th Percentile Speeds 3
2. Vehicle Speed Data — 96`h to 1000' Percentile Speeds 4
3. Pedestrian Crossing Counts 5
4. Collision Statistics 7
5. Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Focus Areas
z
6. Preliminary Recommendations for Safety Improvements 10
LIST OF FIGURES
(IN APPENDIX A)
1. Location Map
2. Existing Traffic Control Features
3. Speed Survey Locations
4. Pedestrian Count Locations
ii
32
I.
INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of El Segundo City Council has expressed various concerns regarding traffic and
pedestrian safety on three arterial streets in the city; i.e., Main Street, Grand Avenue, and
Mariposa Avenue. In response to these concerns, a study has been conducted to evaluate the
existing conditions on these three streets, identify the traffic and pedestrian safety issues, and
develop potential measures for improving the safety deficiencies.
The following street segments were included in the analysis:
Main Street from El Segundo Boulevard to Imperial Avenue
Grand Avenue from Pacific Coast Highway (formerly Sepulveda Boulevard) to Loma
Vista Street
e Mariposa Avenue from Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) to Main Street
A location map showing the location of these three roadway segments is provided on Figure l in
Appendix A. Main Street is a four lane north -south street that runs through the city's downtown
area and is adjacent to El Segundo High School and El Segundo City Hall. Grand Avenue is a
four lane east -west street that extends from the downtown area to PCH and runs near (south of)
El Segundo Middle School at Center Street. Mariposa Avenue is a two lane east -west street that
extends from Main Street to PCH and is adjacent to El Segundo High School (at Main Street)
and Center Street Elementary School (at Center Street).
According to the Master Plan of Streets in the Circulation Element of the City of El Segundo
General Plan, Main Street is designated as a 4-Lane Collector between Imperial Avenue and
Grand Avenue and as a Secondary Arterial between Grand Avenue and El Segundo Boulevard.
Grand Avenue is designated as a Secondary Arterial and Mariposa Avenue is designated as a 2-
Lane Collector.
Figure 2 in Appendix A illustrates the existing traffic control features along each of the three
study area streets. Shown on the figure are the locations of each traffic signal, the intersections
with 4-way stop signs, the intersections with 3-way stop signs, and the locations of each painted
crosswalk at the unsignalized locations. Stop signs on the numerous cross streets that intersect
with the study area streets are not shown on the figure except at the intersections with 3-way or
4-way stop signs (to eliminate clutter on the figure).
The speed limits on the three streets in the study area are as follows:
• Main Street— 25 miles per hour (mph)
Grand Avenue — 25 mph from Loma Vista Street to Eucalyptus Drive and 35 mph from
Eucalyptus Drive to PCH
0 Mariposa Avenue — 25 mph
33
This report summarizes the results of the traffic and pedestrian safety study that was conducted
for the three study area streets. The tasks that were conducted for the analysis are as follows:
• Speed surveys were conducted at three locations on each of the three streets for the AM
peak period, mid -day conditions, and the PM peak period.
• Pedestrian counts were taken at several locations on each of the three streets during the
AM and PM peak periods.
• Collision statistics that were provided by the El Segundo Police Department were
reviewed and analyzed.
Safety issues were identified and potential measures were developed that could be
implemented to improve safety problems on the three study area streets.
2
34
II.
VEHICLE SPEED SURVEYS
Speed surveys were conducted at three locations on each of the three study area streets to
quantify the typical travel speeds during the AM peak hour, the mid -day time period, and the PM
peak hour. The vehicle speeds were measured with a radar speed meter from inside an
inconspicuous private vehicle in May and June, 2018, on days when schools were in session.
The survey locations that were selected represent segments of the streets that are relatively
unaffected by traffic signals and stop signs so that the vehicles were in a free flow operation.
Figure 3 in Appendix A shows the nine locations where the speed surveys were conducted.
Samples of 100 vehicles were surveyed at each location (50 vehicles in each direction).
The critical value that is typically used for analyzing vehicle speed data is the 85`h percentile
speed, which is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traf is is moving. This is the speed
value that is typically used as a starting point in establishing speed limits. Table I shows the 85'h
percentile speeds that were observed at each monitoring location for the AM peak hour, mid -day
time period, and PM peak hour. On Main Street between Imperial Avenue and Maple Avenue,
for example, the 85 percentile speed was 30 mph during the AM peak hour, 32 mph for mid -day,
and 32 mph for the PM peak hour. As the speed limit on Main Street is 25 mph, the 85"'
percentile speeds range from 5 to 7 mph over the speed limit on this segment of Main Street.
TABLE 1
VEHICLE SPEED DATA — 85TH PERCENTILE SPEEDS
Speed
851" Percentile S eed (mph)
AM Peak
Mid -Day
PM Peak
Street/Location
Limit
(mph)
Hour
Hour
Main Street
Between Imperial Avenue & Maple Avenue
25
30
32
32
Between Palm Avenue & Mariposa Avenue
25
27
31
30
Between Holly Avenue & Grand Avenue
25
28
29
29
Grand Avenue
Between Virginia Street & Concord Street
25
26
27
27
Between Eucalyptus Drive & Lomita Street
35
37
39
40
Between Kansas Street & Pacific Coast Hwy
35
39
40
40
Mariposa Avenue
Between Main Street & Sheldon Street
25
26
27
27
Between Sheldon Street & Center Street
25
29
30
31
Between California Street & Washington St
25
30
31
32
Note: AM peak hour is 7:00 to 8:00, mid -day is 10:00 to 11:00, and PM peak hour is 5:00 to 6:00.
Table I indicates that the 85 h percentile speeds on these three streets are generally higher than
the speed limit by values that range from one mph over the speed limit (Mariposa Avenue
between Main Street and Sheldon Street) to 7 mph over the speed limit ( Main Street between
Imperial Avenue and Maple Street and Mariposa Avenue between California Street and
Washington Street).
35
While the 04 percentile speeds shown in Table I are not indicative of a speeding problem, the
speed data were also reviewed to identify the 96`11to t00`r' percentile speeds. These are the travel
speeds that were observed for the highest five percent of the vehicles thar were ,urvcyed. The
96"'to 100`h percentile speeds that were observed at each monitoring location are shown in Table
2 for the AM peak hour, mid -day, and PM peak hour.
The numbers shown in bold in Table 2 highlight the locations where the top travel speeds that
were observed are 15 mph or more above the posted speed limit. The locations with the most
blatant abuse of speed (i.e., speeds that are at least 20 mph above the speed limit) are Grand
Avenue between Kansas Street and PCH, which had a car traveling 55 mph in a 35 mph speed
zone, and Mariposa Avenue between California Street and Washington Street, which had a car
traveling 48 mph in a 25 mph speed zone. in addition, Main Street between Imperial Avenue
and Maple Avenue, Grand Avenue between Eucalyptus Drive and Lomita Strcet, and Mariposa
Avenue between Sheldon Street and Center Street had vehicles traveling 19 mph over the speed
limit.
TABLE 2
VEHICLE SPEED DATA — 96TH TO 100TH PERCENTILE SPEEDS
96"' to 100"' Percentile
Speed
Seeds (mph)
Street/Location
Limit
AM Peak
PM Peak
(mph)
Hour
Mid -Day
Hour
Main Street
Between Imperial Avenue & Maple Avenue
25
34-39
36-42
37-44
Between Palm Avenue & Mariposa Avenue
25
30-35
34-41
33-39
Between 11olly Avenue & Grand Avenue
25
30-34
32-36
31-35
Grand Avenue
Between Virginia Street & Concord Street
25
29-32
30-32
30-33
Between Eucalyptus Drive & Lomita Street
35
41-49
43-52
44-54
Between Kansas Street & Pacific Coast Hwy__35
42-51
44-54
45-55
Mariposa Avenue
Between Main Street & Sheldon Street
25
29-32
30-37
29-35
Between Sheldon Street & Center Street
25
34-40
35-41
36-44
Between California Street & Washington St
25
34-41
35-42
36-48
Note: AM peak hour is 7:00 to 8:00, mid -day is 10:00 to l 1:00, and PM peak hour is 5:00 to 6:00.
The primary findings of the speed survey are that most of the motorists on the three study area
streets are driving at reasonable speeds, as represented by the fact that the 85'1' percentile speeds
range from 1 to 7 mph over the speed limits. Excessive speeding behavior was observed,
however, for about 5 �ercent of the motorists, as represented by the travel speeds shown in bold
in Table 2. These 96" to 100"' percentile motorists are the ones that are observed as "excessive
speeders" and are generally the cause of the safety issues associated with speeding vehicles.
4
36
III.
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING COUNTS
Pedestrian counts were taken at three to four locations on each of the three study area streets to
quantify the number of pedestrians crossing the street during the AM and PM peak periods. The
pedestrian crossings were monitored in May and June, 2018, on days when schools were in
session. The PM peak hour for the locations near schools represented the afternoon dismissal
times (i.e., 2:30 to 3:30 PM), while the PM peak hour for the non -school locations represented
the afternoon commuter peak (i.e., 5:00 to 6:00 PM).
The survey locations that were selected are generally locations where pedestrians cross the street
without the benefit of a traffic signal or multi -way stop signs. The exceptions are the Grand
A . c:.ie/Center Street and Mariposa Avenue/Center Street intersections, which have 4-way stop
signs. These two intersections were monitored because they are near the Center Street
Elementary School and the El Segundo Middle School.
1 --eleven locations where pedestrian counts were taken are shown on Figure 4 in Appendix A.
The number of pedestrians per hour that crossed the street at each of the monitoring locations are
shoiwn in Table 3 for the AM and PM peak hours.
TABLE 3
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING COUNTS
Number of Pedestrians
Street/Location
Crossin (per hour)
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Main Street
At Walnut Avenue
5
8
At Oak Avenue*
14
17
Between Holly Avenue & Grand Avenue (midblock)
19
22
Between Franklin Ave & El Segundo Blvd (midblock)
5
9
Grand Avenue
At Arena Street
l0
13
At Sierra Street
6
8
At Center Street*
5
6
Crossing Center Street*
24
20
At California Street
8
9
Mariposa Avenue
At Standard Street*
21
23
At Center Street*
22
25
At Illinois Street
7
9
{ Represents locations that are adjacent to or near a school.
Table 3 indicates that the locations with a relatively high concentration of pedestrian crossings
are Main Street at Oak Avenue (near El Segundo High School), Main Street between Holly
Avenue and Grand Avenue (a midblock crosswalk at City Hall), Grand Avenue at Arena Street
(near a skate park and teen center), Grand Avenue at Center Street (near El Segundo Middle
5
37
School), Mariposa Avenue at Standard Street (at El Segundo High School), and Mariposa
Avenue at Center Street (near Center Street Elementary School).
The Main Street/Oak Avenue, Main Street/City Hall, Grand Avenue/Arena Street, and Mariposa
Avenue/Standard Street locations have uncontrolled crosswalks where the pedestrians do not
have the benefit of a stop sign or traffic signal to facilitate the crossing movements.
38
IV.
COLLISION STATISTICS
Collision statistics were provided by the El Segundo Police Department for the three study area
street segments. The data represent the reported collisions for the time period extending from
January 2014 to mid -Jane 2018. The printout of the traffic collision report is provided in
Appendix B.
A summary of the collision data is provided in Table 4, which shows the total number of
collisions, the number of pedestrian -related collisions, the number of collisions involving
bicycles, and the collisions resulting in a fatality. The collision statistics are provided for three
segments each for the three study area streets.
As shown, there were 89 reported collisions on Main Street during the 4%-year time period,
which includes 2 pedestrian -related incidents. On Grand Avenue, there were 63 reported
collisions, including 2 pedestrian -related incidents and 2 incidents involving bicycles. On
Mariposa Avenue, there were 50 collisions, which includes 4 pedestrian -related incidents and I
incident involving a bicycle. There were no collisions resulting in a fatality.
TABLE 4
COLLISION STATISTICS
Number of Collisions (2014-2018
Street/Location
Total
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Fatal
Main Street
From Imperial Avenue to Maple Avenue
28
0
0
0
From Maple Avenue to Pine Avenue
22
1
0
0
From Pine Avenue to El Segundo Blvd
39
1
0
0
Total
89
2
_ 0
0
Grand Avenue
From Loma Vista Street to Main Street
8
1
1
0
From Main Street to Center Street
32
0
1
0
From Center Street to Pacific Coast Hwy
23
1
0
0
Total
63
2
2
0
Mariposa Avenue
From Main Street to Sheldon Street
15
3
0
0
From Sheldon Street to Center Street
9
0
0
0
From Center Street to Pacific Coast Hwy
26
1
1
0
Total
50
4
1
0
Overall, the segment of Main Street with the highest number of collisions is the southern
segment between Pine Avenue and EI Segundo Boulevard, which is the downtown area. It had
39 reported collisions. The segment of Grand Avenue with the highest number of collisions is
the middle segment between Main Street and Center Street, which had 32 reported collisions.
The segment of Mariposa Avenue with the highest number of collisions is the eastern end
between Center Street and PCH, which had 26 reported collisions. It should be noted that the
collision totals shown for Grand Avenue and Mariposa Avenue in Table 4 are lower than the
7
numbers shown on the collision report provided by the El Segundo Police Department because
the Police Department printout included collisions that occurred on PCH (Sepulveda Boulevard)
near Grand Avenue and Mariposa Avenue, which are not a component of this analysis.
The locations of the collisions involving pedestrians and bicycles are provided below.
Locations of Pedestrian -Related Collisions
• Mariposa Avenue at PCH
• Main Street at Pine Avenue
• Grand Avenue at Indiana Street
• Mariposa Avenue at Eucalyptus Drive
• Grand Avenue at Loma Vista Street
• 300 Block of Main Street
• 200 Block of Mariposa Avenue
• 100 Block of Mariposa Avenue
Locations of Collisions involving Bicycles
• Mariposa Avenue at Indiana Street
• Grand Avenue at Sheldon Street
• Grand Avenue at Main Street
An overview of the reported collisions was conducted to determine if any of these streets would
be considered as high -accident locations. This was accomplished by calculating the annual
average number of collisions per million vehicle -miles of travel for each street, which is a
standard measurement for collision statistics. The calculations were conducted by using the
number of collisions, the time period addressed (4.5 years), the length of the street segments, and
the average daily traffic volumes on each street. The results are as follows:
Main Street: 3.37 collisions per million vehicle -miles of travel
Grand Avenue: 3.60 collisions per million vehicle -miles of travel
Mariposa Avenue: 5.14 collisions per million vehicle -miles of travel
This level of collision experience is not indicative of a severe safety issue as the values represent
the number of collisions per million miles of travel. Another measure that is typically used to
identify high collision locations is the threshold of five accidents per year at a single location. A
review of the Police Department's collision statistics indicates that there are no locations on the
three study area streets where five or more accidents have been reported within a one-year
period. It is concluded, therefore, that the collision history on the three streets is not indicative of
a critical safety problem.
40
V.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A comprehensive review of the study area street segments with regard to the pedestrian crossing
locations and the geographical distribution of the collision data indicate that there are several
focus areas relative to traffic and pedestrian safety. For purposes of this study, focus areas are
defined as locations where one or more of the analysis criteria were observed to be excessive
relative to pedestrian concentrations and/or collision history. The focus areas that were
identified based on this methodology are listed in Table 5.
TABLE 5
TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY FOCUS AREAS
Safety Focus Area Locations
Criteria to Identify Focus Areas
Main Street at Oak Avenue
Pedestrian Crossings
Main Street from Holly Avenue to Grand
Pedestrian Crossings, Collision History, Pedestrian
Avenue
Collision, & Bike Collision
Grand Avenue from Arena Street to
Collision History, Pedestrian Crossings, & Bike
Sheldon Street
Collision
Grand Avenue from Illinois Street to
Collision History & Pedestrian Collision
Indiana Street
Mariposa Avenue from Main Street to
Pedestrian Crossings & Pedestrian Collisions
Eucalyptus Drive
While the study area streets are not excessively problematic relative to vehicle speeds and
collision history, these focus areas were evaluated to identify potential improvement measures
that could be taken to maintain the City of El Segundo's high standards regarding public health
and safety. The potential safety improvement measures are outlined below.
Toolbox of Potential Safety Improvement/Traffic Calming Measures
There are various measures that could potentially be implemented in an effort to reduce travel
speeds and enhance safety along the study area street segments and at the focus areas outlined
above in particular. The toolbox of safety improvements/traffic calming measures includes the
following:
High Visibility Ladder Crosswalks — Replace the conventional crosswalks that have two
parallel lines crossing the street with high visibility ladder crosswalks that have the two parallel
lines as well as wide lines within the crosswalk that run perpendicular to the outside lines to
improve the visibility of the crosswalks for motorists.
Median Islands — Install median islands at midblock locations to decrease the effective width of
the travel lanes and thereby serve as a traffic calming device to reduce travel speeds.
Traffic Circles — Install small traffic circles in the center of unsignalized intersections to serve
as traffic calming devices to reduce travel speeds through the intersections.
1�9
41
Install Flashing Lights at Crosswalks — Install flashing yellow lights at the uncontrolled
crosswalks to inform motorists of the presence of the painted crosswalks. The flashing lights
could be installed as supplemental beacons on top of the standard pedestrian crossing warning
signs or the conventional signs could be replaced with a row of small flashing lights along the
perimeter of the warning signs.
Bulb -Outs at Intersections — Install curb extensions at intersections to decrease the width of the
travelled way, which would serve as a traffic calming device to reduce travel speeds, and reduce
the walking distance for pedestrians crossing the street.
In -Pavement Lighting — Install flashing lights in the pavement along the alignment of the
crosswalk lines to enhance the visibility of the crosswalks and more effectively notify motorists
of the presence of the crosswalks. The flashing lights could be activated with pedestrian push
buttons or with automatic pedestrian detectors.
Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs — Install electronic signs that use a radar device to measure the
speed of oncoming vehicles and then display the speeds to the motorists to inform them of their
travel speeds. The signs can be programmed to flash or blink when travel speeds are excessive.
TABLE 6
PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
Locations
Recommended Improvements
Main Street at Oak Avenue
Install high visibility ladder crosswalks at the Main
Street/Oak Avenue intersection and flashing beacons
on top of crosswalk warning signs on Main Street
Main Street from Holly Avenue to
None. The City ofEl Segundo has already installed
Grand Avenue
in -pavement lights at the crosswalk
Grand Avenue from Arena Street to
Install high visibility ladder crosswalks and flashing
Sheldon Street
beacons on top of the crosswalk warning signs at the
Arena Street and Sheldon Street crosswalks. Install
vehicle speed feedback signs on Grand Avenue.
Grand Avenue from Illinois Street to
Install vehicle speed feedback signs on Grand Avenue
Indiana Street
Mariposa Avenue from Main Street to
install high visibility ladder crosswalks at the
Eucalyptus Drive
Mariposa Avenue/Standard Street intersection.
The recommended improvements outlined in Table 6 are focused specifically on the focus area
locations that were identified previously. In addition, high visibility ladder crosswalks should be
considered at all locations that currently have a conventional two-line crosswalk at uncontrolled
locations (i.e., no traffic signal or stop sign at the crosswalk) and vehicle speed feedback signs
should be considered for use at all of the locations that were shown to have some drivers
operating at excessive speeds.
Other somewhat questionable measures that are often used by cities to control speeding are speed
humps and stop signs. Speed humps are not recommended for the three study area streets
because these streets are designated as collector and arterial streets. Guidelines for speed hump
10
42
installations generally state that speed humps should be used on local streets and are not to be
used on collector or arterial streets because the speed humps would have a negative impact on
response times for emergency vehicles (police, fire, and paramedic vehicles), which routinely
use these streets as travel routes.
With regard to stop signs, the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices states that
stop signs should not be used for speed control. The objective of a stop sign is to establish right-
of-way priorities for motorists. Stop signs should be installed only if they are shown to be
needed by a warrant analysis. As a result of this study, there are no locations that have been
deemed to require a warrant analysis for additional stop signs.
11
43
APPENDIX A
FIGURES
44
70
Af
Jl r
1 :"}�i� � .� mow•' j
` t°%'1'a7
3�►y.y�
IT
�! -
r• ��;p'}�ii�i�.Wk ' y1
`�^:,-
►. T .{t +ti ail 7 ''.rr. I.
a ANI tom
,
1 7 t R7if+„t'� ►, it AR�►:l
•y rr.� �i'i',r. �' rat; �jl • �:"�•3115 � -' i
So
21.4
qd
VI
ZAw
.�!
14 •� `
13 j.�d d I:j
(g gl@WqA1@
b;Qp
. �
�Q 4E� nN $
1
p 2,
ivd
�
k
__-
�
7
2 =
\ate
$/\
�
m
u 1 mItwo :
e uu;?d
\
—
�
7::
'��MA n]
/
�
®J
M
_
2 O 2
11
_
]3
7
1 oLu | a w
p
0
§m
} �-
— w
\
@
©!
Gu= A
_
�/
\ _
\
w $
_
3 ma 5,w
«
<
<
k
2
12,
, y
\ z
-
%
/
k ?
-
/
!S C1
emol
2 \
E
/
1 SkQIH 2
�
�w
oD
DZ
C0m
wC0
k2
w 7<
�
w
_j a�
of zw
«
<
S LL2
<
LL LL it fn
F-
0
R ob
®O f�
LLJ/ w�
�cn wz
�5z -1«
�w w2
/
R
-PMsc
%Qp v n�md v
5
IwsIDugi
E{
��
IS�blMN/
r
9
_-
/
/
§
2
%
a e! m� r
15 uoEje
/3k
3_0
\ }
\ \
°p `��
v
LLI
.mu
f
:
0
.
ƒe
Sf
/
�
W m•m� �
IS !:;d . -gd
is Ulq$
j QQp;?3
8 wu�
,
\
2
�
E
2
« j
$ /
/0
6A
u
2
A
L
#
o
-
E 3
3 m 'W qS
'a
b
c
± e
- kk
9
®
R
£
r
_ 6 /
§
\
IS CISIA MIJ01
�
e
IS s W m\�H 7
/
'a
G rto�iu a�
o
Fug
d F
|S m u
f
�$
Geu6m
c
3
«
a
% 2
-
/
E
© £
9
i
J
?
cw
2Z
U)w
$
k2
Z$
�
0
§�
ak
Q
z
Jk
ti 013
0 U_
> Ao
> o
Q
w
2 n§�
w0 (!)(D
LLI
�U) w
pq¥e
1S 9ou 1
{ _
g
\
3 umuugG3
P
ij
J
_3-
\
=5
-
-
�
/
■
LL-
&
t
�
twee.@;L
4
a uor@O
\
ea3
�k\/
LU
\��
L
§
§
/
�
/
9 &
m m,mnat
_
� ip
e
R uu-
}
-
LL
.
k
m
qv
f
k k k 0
_.
\ %\ �O
m dX[em u
F ,
o
)3jad-3d
0
LU
|S qE
km�
�
J
|S@uu0g
\
6-
9
I
\
g & >
-
/
7 J
�
f .
3 7 J
-
Q
.
± I
_
e /IS
el5.`L41
01
f
»
�
t
f ng2J�
»w
OD
DZ
�w
�z
%
<o
Ka
¢2
E
wJ
a7
0 2w
0 <�
z' U- <
«
\ A�
9 R§
#W D�
�S®
CO
@Z
FLa wk
|k
APPENDIX B
COLLISION DATA
FROM EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
49
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT- FOR SELECTED AREAS
CATEGORY:
TRAFFIC COLLISIONS
LOCATIONS:
MAIN STREET (BETWEEN EL SEGUNDO BLVD - IMPERIAL AVENUE)
GRAND AVENUE (BETWEEN PACIFIC COAST HWY - LOMA VISTA ST)
MARIPOSA AVENUE (BETWEEN PACIFIC COAST HWY - MAIN ST)
LEVEL:
MOST FREQUENT COLLISIONS
REPORTED PERIOD:
YEAR 2014/201S/2016/2017/2018-YTD
JURISDICTION:
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
TRAFFIC COLLISION TOTALS BY SELECTED LOCATIONS
GRAND AV (PCH TO LOMA VISTA ST) 79
MARIPOSA AV (PCH TO MAIN ST) w
MAIN ST (EL SEGUNDO BLTO IMPERIAL AV)
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 86- 90
MOST FREQUENT TRAFFIC COLLISIONS
600-630 N SEPULVEDA BL - = -- _ `-- 1- -- ---
E MARIPOSA AWN SEPULVEDA BL
500 N SEPULVEDA BL-
800-900 BLK MAIN ST
300-BLK MAIN ST--
E GRAND AWN SEPULVEDA BL --_-- � - -=- -
E IMPERIAL AWMAIN ST - - -- - -_
1900-BLK E GRAND AV - ---_ _-
W GRAND AV/MAIN ST -= --- -- -
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Page I of 13 6/21/2018 REMES/EJ
I
16
50
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT — FOR SELECTED AREAS
TRAFFIC COLLISIONS BY TYPE
TC DUI — 18
TC HIT & RUN 75
TC WITH INJURIES — - IS
TC PROPERTY DAMAGES - — — - — - — 57
TC PEDESTRIAN — 110
Tt BILYCLE --1 3
TC CITY PROPERTY 123
TC FATAL ■ 1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
MAP: MAIN STREET
IMPERIAL MW I'
N
W+E
S
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC COLLISION
STATISTICAL REPORT
— MPERiAL-AVE
LOCATION:
-- ACACLA-AVE -
—<
-
A
'=� -ACA= AVE
MAIN ST
— WALNUT AVE - -
`'
a
WALNUT AV! -_ _ ;
_:wALNUT.Ave
(ITM EL SEGUNDO-IMPERIAL)
-SYCAMORE AVE a
-
o
__ SYCAMORE AVE
ja.
t
REPORTED PERIOD:
— L
MAPLE AVI — '� MAPLE AVl -. — — .�.
20141201=0161201712018
IA
--
---
Are o .__4 z
OAK AVE �
CATEGORY: RMS • REPORTED
'--�— —' -PALM
Bez. PALM AVE 3
- I 3
TRAFFIC COLLISION
9y
II
I
a �
�
INCLUDING DUIIHIT & RUN
AVE ---
—
ME"
o :
";T;
_—__._
ac
MOLLY.•AVE —
121
4
.
TRAFFIC COLLISION
ORANO•AVE-"6 WAVE
CL SEGUNDO 0- '-LNOO
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
SELECTED LOCATION
P80 2010 ammill RECO OVEJ
51
DEL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT — FOR SELECTED AREAS
TIME OF DAY
Tarn of Day Graph
_
E _
Z=
�—f J, J, J = d I d J J J J J d d J
00 Or 9= to 01 9i is 07 Oe f0 71 1'2 1] 14 is 1s 17 is 19 :0 71 ']2 a
Hwr
7a. t7aepr Gate
DAY OF WEEK
E
S
Z
suRl.y rwrlar
re. oa»o. ts�
MONTH OF YEAR
Dayof VYaek Graph
Tapley Vhdmday Tamemy FPo-F SslHq
Dayory a"
Month or Year Graph
rl
t
•
5
a
'A -A
rm par Alw Wr J- Jd .W so ore re+ oK
Ibn•f
77e Oero{p Grow
Page 3 of 13 B/2VZOM AEEUOS&I
52
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC COWSION REPORT —FOR SELECTED AREAS
MAP: GRAND AVENUE
M
t>', rm. Kwr
_ - -
06"
_ --
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
IMPERIA
<
=
" ACAC:A AVE
TRAFFIC COLLISION
acaaa AVE
t,
W a
a
8
1VALNUT AVE
STATISTICAL REPORT
SYCAMORE AVE a
--SVCAMORL AVE
In
MAPLE AVE 3
—=_KAPLEAVE
o -
LOCATION:
_
OAK AVE
's t
-----OAK•AVE
2
GRAND AV
PCH LOMA VISTA ST)
V
PALM AVE Z.
PALM AV[
(E;TW -
R
N
o
"
N
REPORTED PERIOD:
_
-i
MARIPOSA AVE -
_
2014/2015I2Q1 fi12Q17/2018(YTD)
Z
.arEAVE
_ 0
CATEGORY: RMS - REPORTED
t = 5 = o
< MOLLY AVE
_
"
a'
y
TRAFFIC COLLISION
°A
A Ae
INCLUDING DUUHIT & RUN
t =
FRANKLIN AVE
FRANKLEN AVE
'
6 NDER PL
c
i
—
—-<-----
- EL SEGUNDO BLVD
_
�
TRAFFIC COLLISION
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
e
0
i
J
R
�
N
4W+E
3
- -
El SELECTED LOCATION
91
s
TIME OF DAY
Time of DwGrWh
7
i 07 rzl
J J J I J I I I J / J J
J
pp a� CI M OS OL LT N a 10 11 14 17 1� IS ti IT 1'm 16 10 25 72 11
Maur
T!r DmnY� DntuA
Pvp 4 uI8 612VZDIB REUMS/EJ
53
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT - FOR SELECTED AREAS
DAY OF WEEK
DtyoF W"k Graph
I
I)
n
.o
r
� - r
_ c
E
E
z �
)
amway W.mr TF dW /Ad" aWd+T
OayetwMk
tA. onrce o.ow
MONTH OF YEAR
Morth of Year Graph
a
i
s
z
JAL]. A, A. A . d A ,
i r.e hAP,am. Atw A. id Aw UP
M.5,
rw omcrs crow
hpe5of13 B/YVYBIB RCM/Ed
54
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTIVFENT
TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT — FOR SELECTED AREAS
MAP: MARIPOSA AVENUE
N
WE o EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
S _ 1_,os TRAFFIC COLLISION
I�eaw _ IMPERIAL HWY—_ _ : STATISTICAL REPORT
IA IMPERIAL
tr' 'AuaAA-=ACA0WAve— LOCATION:
A.
r ° r WALNUT AV* .=WWWTAVE- MARIPOSA"
(BTW PCH - MAIN ST)
REPORTED PERIOD:
.NA►Lt-AYl, wvu AVE- - - -�--2 2014M01S12016/201712018(YTD)
i I
OA*AVE OAK AVE _ OAKAVI
A. CATEGORY: RMS - REPORTED
MAXIM --.VMM-AVB-- t TRAFFIC COLLISION
EIHAvs I INCLUDING DUIIHIT &RUN
6
PSNE•AVE-- --lINEAVh—
O
° 6 TRAFFIC COLLISION
-3 — —�—` GA WD.AVE—OVANC-AV[
0 5
0
- EL stGUNno 6cvo-- _---ErsEcuNno uvo_—�_--
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO SELECTED LOCATION
TIME OF DAY
Tim of Day onph
oe i
s"
0
o
1
. -�—
L AM T e J • d / I A 1 I A
M Ot as m w 05 00 07 06 as 1a 1� i7. 1� 1� 1b M 11 1/ is 20 Y1 g
Hart
Pap 6of 13 6121/21118 RMO M/W
EL SEGTi NDO POLICE DEPARTIMENT
TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT — FOR SELECTED AREAS
DAY OF WEEK
Day of Wask Graph
�o
a �
r I
o i
T_ Aw .r Th wan s.wr.r
oarat�.t
0--wof"
MONTH OF YEAR
r
L
Jn
Month of YsarGraph
#I--
__77
An UP Ocl �IOY Q.
DATA SOURCE: RMS —TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORTS
REPORTED PERIOD: 2014/2015/2016/2017/2018 YTD = 252 TRAFFIC COLLISIONS
RPT No
LOCATION
9 1 DATE
TIME
I OFFENSE
DESCRIPTION
RD
OFCR
14-0219
INDIANA STIE MARIPOSA AV
101=14
14:24:37 1TC
BICYCLE
TC BICYCLE INJURY
E209
30453
14-0379
JE GRAND AVISHELDON ST
02W2014
20:15:29 1
rc BICYCLE ITC
BICYCLE INJURY
E113
30502
17-1370
JW GRAND AVIMAIN ST
,05/0812017
16:43:16 JrCBICYCLE
ITCBICYCIFINJIIRY
E113
30467
RPT No
I LOCATION
I DATE
TIME
I OFFENSE
DESCRIPTION
RD
OFCR
14-0467
(MAIN STIE MARIPOSA AV
1 102115/2014
12:15.36
ITC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E108
:30437
14-1222
348 MAIN ST
05/09/2014
12,43:56
ITC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
El11
30495
14-1508
603 N SEPULVEDA BL
06104/2014
16:17:30 ITC
CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E210
:30453
14-1588
500 N SEPULVEDA BL
06/1212014
21:55:04
ITC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E308
30463
14-1917
348 MAIN ST
07/1812014
16:50:09
ITC CITY PR
ITC CITY PROPERTY
E111
30507
Page 7 of 13 612VZUIB IEIODS/EJ
56
EIS SEG NDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC COLUSION REPORT — FOR SELECTED AREAS
14-2420
900-BLK MAIN ST
09AM014
09:19.23
TC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E102
:30495
14-2662
:200-BLK E GRAND AV
10/02/2014
16:21:33
TC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E113
30492
14-2698
1400-0LK E GRAND AV
10AM014
10.58:54
TC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E212
30472
15.0254
400-BLK MAIN ST
0113012015
14:13.53
TC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E108
30497
15-1726
1700-BLK E MARIPOSA AV
07/20/2015
12:5201
1 TC CITY PR
fic CITY PROPERTY
E209
130495
15-2202
1800-BLK E GRAND AV
09/14/2015
05:58:09
TC CITY PR
ITC CITY PROPERTY
I212
130495
16-Ml
275 MAIN ST
10i=MO16
12:0510
TC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E112
30492
16-0323
348 MAIN ST
joiji5nom
10:16:57
TC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E111
30495
16-0702
348 MAIN ST
04/11/2016
17.06:35
TC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E111
30467
16-0730
500-BLK N SEPULVEDA BL
04/15/2016
16:04:30
TC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E308
30492
16-1654
348 MAIN ST
W15/2016
10:46:57
TC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E111
30467
16-1695
1300-BLK E GRAND AV
08/19/2016
16:10.41
TC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E212
130436
16.2700
18004H K E GRAND AV
12108/2016
1114.39
TC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E212
30467
17-0108
300-BLK MAIN ST
12119/2016
12:04:55
TC CITY PR
7C CITY PROPERTY
E111
30495
17-1737
:348 MAIN ST
O6/1212017
01:19:23
TC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E111
30514
17-2930
348 MAIN ST
09/28/2017
10:40:47
TC CITY PR
CC CITY PROPERTY
E111
30467
17-3350
130 E GRAND AV
11/06/2017
113226
TC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
E113
MBPD
17.3436
1310 E GRAND AV
11/03/2017
9,26:55
ITC CITY PR
TC CITY PROPERTY
IE113
MBPD
RPT No
LOCATION
tt DATE
TIME
OFFENSE
DESCRIPTION
RD
OFCR
115-0236
IN SEPULVEDA BLIE MARIPOSA AV
1 10112&12015
120:57:54
TC FATAL
ITC FATAL
IIE210
130492
RPT No
LOCATION
1# 1 DATE
TIME
I OFFENSE
DESCRIPTION
RD
OFCR
14-0014
E GRAND AVIN SEPULVEDA BL
10110312014
OT31:17
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E212
30504
14-0066
310 E GRAND AV
01/08/2014
18:49:33
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E113
30492
14-0200
IE IMPERIALAWMAIN ST
01/21/2014
05.49:44
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E102
30495
14-0382
1000-BLK E MARIPOSA AV
0210712014
13T41:04
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E208
30495
14-0703
1400 E GRAND AV
03/1012014
15.23:14
TC NON [NJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E212
30453
14-0913
500-BLK N SEPULVEDA BL
134/0212014
08:03:22
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E308
M453
14-1346
CENTER ST/E MARIPOSA AV
05122/2014
15:11:29
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E208
30497
14-1356
100 E GRAND AV
05/2312014
13:28:19 ITC
NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E113
30472
14-1558
508 MAIN ST
W O/2014
20A5:54 In
NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E108
30414
14-1660
919 MAIN ST
06/21/2014
I6:18:39 ITC
NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
TC PROP DAMAGE
E102
E108
30497'
30495
144961
400 MAIN ST
0712212014
07:34:31 ITC
NON INJ
14-1997
E GRAND AV/LOMITA ST
07/26/2014
16:43:52
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E211
30437
14-2034
13UNGALOW DRIE MARIPOSA AV
07/30/2014
13:17:54
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E208
30497
14-2131
E MARIPOSA AWN SEPULVEDA SL
0810912014
20:32:25
TC NON [NJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E210
30505
14-2632
300-BLK E MARIPOSA AV
09/2912014
12:55:41
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
IE109
30495
14-2770
243 MAIN ST
10/1412014
13:34:41
TC NON [NJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E112
30492
14-3156
500 W GRAND AV
11/29/2014
07:33:48
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E112
30453
143185
N SEPULVEDA BL/E MARIPOSA AV
1210312014
12:14:55
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E210
30495
15-0035
500-BLK MAIN ST
0110 /2015
12.50:55
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
,E108
30495
15-0039 .400-BLK
S SEPULVEDA BL
01105/2015
18:17:43
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E317
30492
15-0059
500-BLK MAIN ST
10110812015
17:16:18
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
'E108
30492
15-0061
300 N SEPULVEDA BL
1011OW015
17:31:31
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E308
30505
15-0098 'BOO-BLK
MAIN ST
10111212015
19,42:40
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E102
30492
15.0903
232 MAIN ST
13411612015
04:34:57
TC NON [NJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E113
30499
15-1284 '348
MAIN ST
06/02/2015
09:55:24
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E111
30467
15-1620 1-
GRAND AVIKANSAS ST
07/10/2015
21:50:14
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E212
30464
15-1769 1900
MAIN ST
07/2512015
05:57:36
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E102
30453
Pegs 80l a erllrmis REcnans/F.I
57
EIS SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT— FOR SELECTED AREAS
151913
1900 E GRAND AV
08HOI2015
20:25:28
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E311
30479
15.1918
E GRAND AVILOMITA ST
08H1/2015
15:53:21
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E211
30467
15-2001
400-BLK W MARIPOSA AV
0812012015
10:41.44
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E107
:30472
15-2009
300•©LK MAIN ST
08121/2015
10:43:22
TC NON INJ
C PROP DAMAGE
E111
:30472
15-2030
348 MAIN ST
07I08015
1329:57
TC NON INJ
TCPROPDAMAGE
F_111
LAPD
15-2064
700-BLK MAIN ST
08 12015
12:32:35
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E106
30472
15-2173
348 MAIN ST
09H012015
0721:16
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E111
30472
15-2199
300-BLK N SEPULVEDA BL
09/1312015
17:06:30
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
1=308
30469
15-2733
251 MAIN ST
11/2012015
17:35:20
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E112
30495
15-2748
E MARIPOSA AWN SEPULVEDA BL
jil0015
:21:48:52
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E210
30453
15-2876
:200-BLK MAIN ST
12/14/2015
07:5202
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E113
30448
16-0098
EUCALYPTUS DRIE MARIPOSA AV
01/14/2016
18:36.56
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E109
30505
16-0469
500-BLK MAIN ST
03/07/2016
14.50,21
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E108
30467
16-0553
E MARIPOSA AVIEUCALYPTUS DR
030/2016
12:05Al
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E109
30510
16-0825
MAIN STM MAPLE AV
04rA=16
17:4424
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
El05
:30467
16-1011
WHOLLY AWMAIN ST
001016
13:12:55
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
El11
:30445
16-1286
408 MAIN ST
06/2412016
30:07:29
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E108
30489
16-1642
500 N SEPULVEDA BL
01212016
17.31:20
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E305
30510
16-2305
E GRAND AVISIERRA ST
1012 O16
20:38:04
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E211
30512
17-W68
830 N SEPULVEDA BL
02H2/2017
14,19:30
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E306
30445
17-0677
100-BLK MAIN ST
10310MI17
04.56:04
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
El13
30495
17-1239
500-BLK E MARIPOSA AV
04/24/2017
13:17:36
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E208
30467
17-1552
E MARIPOSA AVIN SEPULVEDA BL
05JSM17
19:45:01
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E210
30480
17-2141
630 N SEPULVEDA SL
07/17/2017
09:39:41
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E305
30467
17 2849
251 MAIN ST
D9/4 017
19:14:49
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E112
30463
17-3629
600-BLK N SEPULVEDA BL
12/06/2017
15:14,34
TC NON INJ ITC
PROP DAMAGE
E306
30519
18-0296 ICENTER,
STIE IMPERIAL AV
131131/2018
02:02:12
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E201
3922
18-0803
310E GRAND AV
03/2312018
11:21-37
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
El13
:30520
18-1201
314 MAIN ST
3/2018
10:46:41
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E111 1.30522
18-1271 11776
E GRAND AV
10/2018
15:46:47
TC NON INJ
TC PROP DAMAGE
E212 1.30459
RPT No I
LOCATION IN
I DATE
TIME I
OFFENSE I
DESCRIPTION
RD
I OFCR
14-0188
E MARIPOSA AVIN SEPULVEDA BL
6111912014
22:37:00
TC PED INJ
TC PEDESTRIAN
E210 130504
14-1041
MAIN STIE PINE AV
NIBO14
12:58:02
TC PED INJ
TC PEDESTRIAN
E108 130497
14-1914
600-BLK N SEPULVEDA BL
07/18/2014
:54.57
TC PED [NJ
TC PEDESTRIAN
E305
30450
14-3221
INDIANA STIE GRAND AV
12108I2014
08:59:19
TC PED [NJ
TC PEDESTRIAN
E212
30495
15-0174
E MARIPOSA AV/EUCALYPTUS DR
01/21 015
13:33:03
TC PED INJ
TC PEDESTRIAN
E109
30492
15-1957
GRAND AVILOMA VISTA ST
1=1612015
10:42:29
TC PED INJ
TC PEDESTRIAN
E112
30469
15-2707
300-BLK MAIN ST
11117/2015
15:55:55
'TC PED INJ
TC PEDESTRIAN
IE111
30472
16-0339 :200-BLK
E MARIPOSA AV
(1211712016
7.45:51
TC PED INJ
TC PEDESTRIAN
E109
30472
16-0586
100-BLK W MARIPOSA AV
(XV2512016
20:23.23
TC PED INJ
TC PEDESTRIAN
E108
30492
16-2183 15W
N SEPULVEDA BL
1011012016
08:26:19
TC PED INJ ITC
PEDESTRIAN
E308
30467
RPT No I
LOCATION
#1 DATE
TIME
OFFENSE I
DESCRIPTION
RD
OFCR
14-0053
1900 E GRAND AV
01/07/2014
14:11:14
TC W/INJ
TC W INJURY
E311
30497
14-0070
E MARIPOSA AVIN SEPULVEDA BL
01109/2014
12:13:38
TC WIINJ
TC W INJURY
I;210
30495
14-0518
MAIN STIE PINE AV
02/2112014
13:29:59
TC WIINJ
TC W INJURY
I_108
30497
14-0577
E GRAND AVIMARYLAND ST
02/2712014
23:42:34
TC WANJ
TC W INJURY
-211
30499
14-1573 :500
N SEPULVEDA BL
0611112014
18:25:52
TC WANJ
TC W INJURY
E308
30495
14-2074 JE
MARIPOSA AWN SEPULVEDA BL
06/0312014
22:27:29 ITC
WIINJ
TC W INJURY
210
30498
Pap 9 d 13 6/2112M REEI62D5/w
58
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTIMENT
TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT— FOR SELECTED AREAS
14-2340
1525 N SEPULVEDA BL
08/31/2014
I09:10:07
rC WAND
rC W INJURY
JE210
P0453
14-2444
IE GRAND AVIKANSAS ST
09M 0/2014
117,59:19
C WANJ
VC W INJURY
P212
130492
14-2900
1111 W MARIPOSA AV
10/29/2014
118:36:33
ITC WANJ
VC W INJURY
JE107
130505
14-2939
WCALYPTUS DRIE GRAND AV
11/0312014
18.10.29
TC WIINJ
]TC W INJURY
El13
130497
143007
JE GRAND AVIN SEPULVEDA BL
11/102014
08:38:50
1TC WIINJ
ITC W INJURY
E212
30472
15-0272
11900 E MARIPOSA AV
10210112015
:25:55
rC WIINJ
rTC W INJURY
F308
13040
15-0330
I200-BLK W IMPERIAL AV
02109/2015
9.03:36
ITC WANJ
rC W INJURY
IE101
I30370
15-0820
JINDIANA STIE MARIPOSA AV
04/0712015
8:30:06
ITC WANJ
rC W INJURY
009
L39L97
15-1140
MO-BLK MAIN ST
5/15/2015
19,48:55
ITC WIINJ
tM W INJURY
�102
130493
15-1141
JE MARIPOSA AWN SEPULVEDA BL
OW1512015
�0:23:59
rTC WIINJ
r C W INJURY
pi 0
130502
15-1374
9M-BLK MAIN ST
06/11/2015
I15:53:27
C WIINJ
rC W INJURY
F102
P0467
15-1455
1500 N SEPULVEDA BL
6/21 /2015
1251;24
FC WANJ
rfC W INJURY
JE308
I30453
15-1522
WBLKN SEPULVEDA BL
06/3012015
1;41;12
rC WIINJ
C W INJURY
lE308
30508
15-1912
11900-BLK E GRAND AV
0811012015
20:25:28
C WIINJ
C W INJURY
E311
30414
'15-1973
lE GRAND AVANDIANA ST
18/2015
:07:49
r C WIINJ
r C W INJURY
012
130467
15-1987
1300-BLK S SEPULVEDA BL
8/19/2015
08:35:10
C W11NJ
JTC W INJURY
P317
130495
15-2069
1300-BLK MAIN ST
08/27/2015
r18:40:08
rC WIINJ
rc W INJURY
jE111
30445
15-2236
1100-BIX E MARIPOSA AV
0911812015
07:19:41
C W/1NJ
rC W INJURY
JE108 130472
15-2339
IW GRAND AVMRGINIA ST
10A)212015
JW:18:00
rC WANJ
ITC W INJURY
IE107
130492
15-2697
300-8LK MAIN ST
11115/2015
V08:54:07
KC WANJ
C W INJURY
JE111 130497
15-28Z7
GRAND AVIKANSAS ST
1210812015
08:04:41
TC WIINJ
C W INJURY
JE212
130492
15-2885
(MAIN STM MAPLE AV
11211512015
13:54:30
TC WIINJ
C W INJURY JE105
I30467
15-2938
V23 W MARIPOSA AV
12/25/2015
14:26:14
TC WIINJ
C W INJURY. jE107
P9498
16-0738
llW0-BLK E MARIPOSA AV
0411612016
.14:36:39
TC WANJ
KC W INJURY
E210
I30495
16-0846
1400-BLK S SEPULVEDA BL
05102/2016
15:17:00
rC WANJ
ITC W INJURY
g317
0467
16-0857
I600-BLK MAIN ST
05/03/2016
10:02:32
ITC WIINJ
ITC W INJURY
IE106
I30511
16-0898 I
—MLK MAIN ST
05109/2016
I17:37:37
ITC WIINJ
rrC W INJURY
(105
P0467
16-1058
GRAND AVANAW ST
05127/2016 119:58:45
rTC WANJ ITC
W INJURY
�l13 130433
16-1152
JE MARIPOSA AVILOMITA ST
06/0712016
17:44:33
C WIINJ ITC
W INJURY
E208
P0467
16-1411
I004" MAIN ST
07/1212016
:28:59
r C WANJ
ITC W INJURY
102
Owl
16-1453 JE
IMPERIAL AWMAIN ST
0711612016
:27:56
rfC WANJ
ITC W INJURY
IE102
130491
16-1539 I
WBLK MAIN ST
07/29/2016
15:29:31 ITC
WANJ
�C W INJURY
K105
130472
16-1785 11300-BLK
E MARIPOSA AV
08129/2016 114:26:20
TC WIINJ ITC
W INJURY
130467
16-1828 (MAIN
STM OAK AV
09/02/2016
14.46:25
TC WANJ ITC
W INJURY
K106
130472
16-1905 JE
GRAND AV/SIERRA ST
09/10/2016
10:04:59
TC WANJ ITC
W INJURY JE211
13G436
16-2461 1525
N SEPULVEDA BL
11/11/2016
9:3210 ITC
WANJ
rC W INJURY JE210
30436
16-2917 11300-BLK
E MARIPOSA AV
12/28/2016
10:05:14 ITC
WANJ JrC
W INJURY JE209
30467
17-0010 AMAIN
STM OAK AV
01102/2017
17:53:51
rC WANJ
C W INJURY
�E106
30472
17-0033 JE
MAPLE AVIMAIN ST
01/05/2017
06:09:04
rC WANJ
rC W INJURY
P105
30472
17-0392 I800-BLKMAIN
ST
02I05/2017
16.41:21
ITC WANJ
ITC W INJURY
P105
P0464
17-0411 IE
IMPERIAL AWMAIN ST
02/07/2017 I19:25.47
C WANJ ITC
W INJURY
9102
I30489
17-0616 ICENTER
STIE GRAND AV
02/25/2017 119:59:39
RC WANJ
KC W INJURY
1
30513
17-1149 jN
SEPULVEDA BUE GRAND AV
04/15/2017
19:32:41
ITC WANJ
TC W INJURY
1W2
130513
17-1540 IMAIN
ST/W GRAND AV
05/24/2017 123:35:24
C WIINJ
TC W INJURY
�113
00512
17-2072
300-BLK N SEPULVEDA BL
07/12/2017
06:43:51
C WANJ
TC W INJURY
JE308
130467
17-2526 JE
GRAND AVANASHINGTON ST
08121/2017
16:35:45 ITC
WANJ
rC W INJURY
F212
130467
17-2572 JE
GRAND AVISHELDON ST
08/26/2017 111:24:27
KC WANJ
rC W INJURY
IE113
P0516
17-3418 JE
GRAND AV/STANDARD ST
11/14/2017' 110:35:31
ITC
WANJ ITC
W INJURY
�l13
130467
Pep W o113 6/21/2018 BERRDS/W
Wt
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPAETTIVIENT
TRAFFIC C01 I ESION REPnRT—FOR SELECTED AREAS
17-0419
W EL SEGUNDO M MAIN ST
111142017
11:10:48
TC WANJ
TC W INJURY
E113
30467
17-3820
1900-BLK E GRAND AV
12I0512017
18:04:34
TC WANJ
TC W INJURY
E311
30467
184)086
311 MAIN ST
01AM18
14:23:21
TC WANJ
TC W INJURY
E108
30467
18-0305
1300a K GRAND AV
01/3112018
17.43.46
TC WANJ
TC W INJURY
E112
30445
184)345
113004M MAIN ST
102M212018
12:06:56
TC WANJ
TC W INJURY
E105
30489
18-0369
E GRAND AVIN SEPULVEDA BL
JOW5018
15:21:31
TC WANJ
TC W INJURY
E212
30467
18-0406
1900-BLK E GRAND AV
1020018
17:29:50
TC WANJ
TC W INJURY
E311
30463
18-0468
E MARIPOSA AVIN SEPULVEDA BL
021142018
16:30:41
TC WANJ
TC W INJURY
E210
30466
18-0683
700•BLK W MARIPOSA AV
031102018
19:11:28
TC WANJ
TC W INJURY
E107
30493
18-1199
IW MARIPOSA AVNIRGINIA ST
05/0312018
9:15:02
TC WnNJ
TC W INJURY
E107
30469
18-1532
1000-BLK MAIN ST
06/1012018
18:18:12
ITCWnNJ
ITC W INJURY
IE102
130524
RPT No
I LOCATION
M DATE
I TIME
I OFFENSE
I DESCRIPTION
I RD
I OFCR
14-0054
500 N SEPULVEDA BL
1/0712014
14:10:20
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E308
30497
14-0543
W GRAND AVIRICHMOND ST
212312014
18:23.48
20MC
HIT & RUN TC
E107
:30504
14-0768
N SEPULVEDA BL/E GRAND AV
3116120%
19:44:05
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E212
30493
14-0927
632 W MARIPOSA AV
0410 MM
07.10:02
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
IE107
30472
14-1095
639 N SEPULVEDA BL
/222014
07:27.06
:20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E210
30453
14-1448
200-BLK E MARIPOSA AV
0512812014
14:28:29
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E109
30392
14-1522
640 MAN ST
06/06/2014
16:19:33
:20002VC
MIT & RUN TC
E106
30472
14-1812
400-BLK MAIN ST
lD710812014
15:31:05
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E108
30495
W2572
IE MARIPOSA AVIN SEPULVEDA BL
09/102014
07:19.58
2W02VC
HIT & RUN TC
E210 130495
W2651
E PINE AWIMAIN ST
10101/2014
14:49:05
2000ZVC
HIT & RUN TC
E108 130495
15-0134
400-BLK E GRAND AV
01/162015
12:32:40
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E113
30453
15-0209
525 N SEPULVEDA BL
01/25/2015
20:58:01 1200DZVC
HIT & RUN TC
E210
COPLOG
15-0253
500-BLK N SEPULVEDA BL
101130015
13:33:55
20001(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
C308
30497
15-0575
935 MAIN ST
03109/2015
18:00:00
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
I=102
:30469
15-0743
1309 E GRAND AV #D
03130/2015
00:13:04
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
C-209
30498
15-0921
200-BLK E GRAND AV
(1411912015
-07:19.06
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E113
30"5
15-0994
603 N SEPULVEDA BL
041272015
18:22:44
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
1E210
30463
15-1001
400 M E GRAND AV
042812015
22:06:32
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
IE113
:30499
I5-1013
E GRAND AWN SEPULVEDA BL
141=15
13:57:05
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E212
30497
15-1213
CONCORD STIW GRAND AV
05J2312015
10:46:25
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
i:107
30437
15-1451
550-BLK S SEPULVEDA BL
j06FM2015
17:38:28
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
:317
OTHER
15-1475 11776
E GRAND AV
06242015
07:0130 12=2VC
HIT & RUN TC
102
30825
15-1528 1310
E GRAND AV
07/01/2015
17:28:37 120002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E113
30492
15-1707 IMAIN
ST/W PALM AV
07/182015
14:48:56
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
1_106
30870
15-1819
200-BLK MAIN ST
07/30I2015
16:46:09
:20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
1=113
30492
15-1886 JE
MARIPOSA AVIN SEPULVEDA BL
08/0712015
21:14:26
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E210
:30508
15-1910 14MBLK
E GRAND AV
10811012015
14:23:44
:20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
-113
30495
15-2017 JE
GRAND AVfKANSAS ST
0822@015
13:04.33
MMIBlVC
HIT & RUN TC
IE212
30502
15-2065
309 N SEPULVEDA BL
0812712015
12:56:07
:20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
C- 10
30492
15-2115
300-BLK N SEPULVEDA BL
091022015
14,57:17
:20002VC
1HIT & RUN TC
E308
.30467
15-2249
200-BLK W GRAND AV
09/2 2015
03:48:01
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
El12
.30493
15-2302
CENTER ST/E GRAND AV
109126015
18:26:23
20MI (A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E211
30499
15-2440
630 N SEPULVEDA BL
10/132015
15:39:28
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E305
30495
15-2552
406 E GRAND AV
102912015
06:32:47
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E113
30825
15-2702
500 N SEPULVEDA BL
11/162015
12:55:59
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E308
30495
15-2722 1348
MAIN ST
livigrai
15:19:36 120002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E111
30495
Page II of 13 6/21/20M REEORO M
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTDI TENT
TRAFFIC CAI_I ISION REPORT— FOR SELECTED AREAS
16-0425
E GRAND AV1N SEPULVEDA BL
03/0112016
20A8:10
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
,212
30510
16-0533
951 MAIN ST
03/192016
09:27.20
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E102
30451
1640583
630 N SEPULVEDA BL
03/25/2016
1&04:50
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E305
30492
16-0588
LOMITA ST/E MARIPOSA AV
o3/25/2016
21:32:11
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E208
30498
16-0761
300-BLK N SEPULVEDA BL
10412012016
15:47:05
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E308
30492
16-0918
!E IMPERIAL AV/MAIN ST
05/11/2016
22:37:02
120002VC
141T & RUN TC
E102
30466
16-1129
E MARIPOSA AWN SEPULVEDA BL
06/04/2016
16:32:08
20002VC
AT & RUN TC
i�210
30870
16-1368
100 W IMPERIAL AV
07/0512016
14:26:24
20002VC
JHIT&RUNTC
E102
30510
16-1428
100 W IMPERIAL AV
07/1312016
22:20:24
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E102
30511
16-1452
800 N SEPULVEDA BL
07/16/2016
19:52:46
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC.
E305
30499
16-1480
jE MARIPOSA AV/N SEPULVEDA BL
07/2112016
18:35.02
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E210
30489
16-1600
640 MAIN ST
138/0812016
19:17.41
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E106
30514
16-1878
500 N SEPULVEDA BL
09/07/2016
18:51:49
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E308
30475
16-2123
310 E GRAND AV
I I01OW016
1201:09
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E113
30467
16-2327
500-BLK MAIN ST
11012612016
06:18:05
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E108
COPLOG
16-2463
800-BLK E GRAND AV
11111/2016
13:19:10
20W2VC
141T & RUN TC
E211
30436
16-2475
143 MAIN ST
11/1212016
18.48:13
20002VC
14ff & RUN TC
E112
30491
16-2523
500-BLK N SEPULVEDA BL
11/192016
10:44:47
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E308
30512
17-0029
310 E GRAND AV
011=017
21:39:02
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E113
:30475
17-0142
40MLK MAIN ST
1/142017
18:48:21
20001B1VC
HIT & RUN TC
1E108
30512
17-0704
1630 N SEPULVEDA BL
03106/2017
15:50:37
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
I==
30464
17-1182
1434 MAIN ST
04M92017
07:23:20
7-0002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E108
:30472
17-1192
'W GRAND AWMAIN ST
04202017
09:36:27
20001(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E113
:30467
17-1303
.321 MAIN ST
051012017
15:14.47
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
iE108
30467
17-1428
1300 N SEPULVEDA BL
051152017
15.55:50
:20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E305
301017
17-1547
1300-BLK N SEPULVEDA BL
136MO17
12:22:11
:?0002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E305
30467
17-2312
601 N SEPULVEDA BL
h0022017
09:45:11
:20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E210
30467
17-2783
500 N SEPULVEDA BL
09/142017
08.35:38
2=2VC
HIT & RUN TC
1=308
30445
17-3136
500 N SEPULVEDA BL
101182017
14:32:43
:20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E305
30467
17-3296
N SEPULVEDA BL/E GRAND AV
11/022017
15:43:04 120002VC
HIT & RUN TC
+:212
30512
17-3471
E IMPERIAL AWMAIN ST
11/212017
07:45:09
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
iE102
30459
18-0024
1900-BLK E MARIPOSA AV
01103/2018
15:06:21
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
1:308
30467
18-0241 1348
MAIN ST
0123/2018
20:27:26
20001(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E111
30463
18-0552 1120
E GRAND AV
021232018
14:03:30
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E113
30523
I8-0625
MAIN SWE IMPERIAL AV
ON312018
11:50:54
20001(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E102
30514
18-0702 1
500 N SEPULVEDA BL
10311212018 113:2255
20001(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E308
30467
18-0808
20MLK W MARIPOSA AV
D=32018
16:13:24
20002(A)VC
HIT & RUN TC
E107
X994
18-0977
331 N SEPULVEDA BL
D410912018
15:31.44
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
1=210
13W9
18-1227
348 MAIN ST
05105/2018
18:21:47
20002VC
HIT & RUN TC
E111
130437
RPT No
LOCATION
# DATE
TIME
OFFENSE
I DESCRIPTION
I RD
I OFCR
14-1643
100 E GRAND AV
06/192014
21:34:12
23152(A)VC
DUI TC
E113
13D492
14-2078
1337 E GRAND AV
1 08J042014
16:29:59
23152(A)VC
DUI TC
E209
130970
14-2377
LOMA VISTA STM MARIPOSA AV
2 09/03/2014
:22:48:50
23152(A)VC
DUI TC
IEl07
130489
14-2606
W MARIPOSA AVNIRGINIA ST
3 09262014
14:26:24
23152(A)VC
DUI TC
IE107
130453
14-2746
331 N SEPULVEDA BL
4 10/11/2014
:23:09:02
23152(A)VC
DUI TC
E210
:30502
15-1759
W EL SEGUNDO BUMAIN ST
0723/2015
21:18:18
23152(A)VC
DUI TC
El13
30448
15-2490
1700 E MARIPOSA AV
1020/2015
111:14:18
23152(A)VC
DUI TC
E209
30509
15-2787
CALIFORNIA ST1E GRAND AV
11/30/2015
14:43:21
23152(A)VC
DUI TG
E212
:30467
Page 12 of 13 612VZBE f1E13ROSAJ
61
EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT— FOR SELECTED AREAS
16-02M
JW EL SEGUNDO BLIMAIN ST
1/31/2016
h7:41:05
I23152(A)VC
0UI TC
P113
64
1W61
60D-BLK E EL SEGUNDO BL
6
I00:35:02
l23152(A)VC
DUI TC
115
RM
16-05P
JE MARIPOSA AV/SHELDON ST
03/25/2016
120*50:00
I23153(A)VC
JDUI TC
P109
p0497
16.0689
JE MARIPOSA AV/N SEPULVEDA BL
04/10/2016
01:29:03
123153(A)VC
IDUI TC
F210
130502
16-1349
05 MAIN ST
07101/2016
120,27.17
152(A)VC
DUI TC
JE108
130495
W2517
IM N SEPULVEDA BL
11/19=6
-48:51
152(A)VC
JDUI TC
(E308
P0510
1&2849 JE
GRAND AV/STANDARD ST
1M 2016
19.08:54
152(A)VC
IDUI TC
P113
00
17-0116
JE IMPERIALAVMIAIN ST
01/13/2017
W-34:46
152(A)VC JDUI
TC
�102
12
17-1001 (E
GRAND AV/LOMrTA ST
1 0410212017 117:04:16
P3152(A)VC JDUI
TC
IE211
130464
17-2349 1700-BLK
MAIN ST
2 08/04/2017
.39:27
152(A)VC JDUI
TC JE106
00516
Pap 13 o113 6/9/mm RECMUS/EJ
W