CC RESOLUTION 5477
Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material.
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... ES-1
ES.2. EIR Document Organizer.............................................................................................. ES-2
ES.3. Project Description ........................................................................................................ ES-4
ES.3.a. Project Overview ......................................................................................... ES-4
ES.3.b. Project Objectives ....................................................................................... ES-5
ES.4. Summary of Project Alternatives .................................................................................. ES-6
ES.4.a. Alternative A-No Project Alternative ........................................................... ES-6
ES.4.b. Alternative B-Reduced Specific Plan Development Alternative ................. ES-6
ES.4.c. Alternative C-Adopted El Segundo Specific Plan Boundary Alternative ... ES-6
ES.4.d. Environmentally Superior Alternative ......................................................... ES-7
ES.5. Areas of Known Controversy/Issues To Be Resolved ............................................. ES-7
ES.6. Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures.................................... ES-8
I. INTRODUCTION
I.1. CEQA Overview and Purpose of an EIR .......................................................................... I-2
I.2. Purpose of a Specific Plan................................................................................................ I-3
I.3. Organization of this EIR .................................................................................................... I-4
I.4. Lead Agency and Responsible Agencies ......................................................................... I-6
I.4.a. City of El Segundo .......................................................................................... I-6
I.4.b. Responsible Agencies .................................................................................... I-6
I.5. EIR Scoping Process ........................................................................................................ I-7
I.5.a. Notice of Preparation ...................................................................................... I-7
I.5.b. Scoping Meeting ............................................................................................. I-7
I.5.c. Initial Study .................................................................................................... I-12
I.6. Public Review Process ................................................................................................... I-13
I.6.a. Mitigation Monitoring Procedures ................................................................. I-13
I.6.b. Final EIR ....................................................................................................... I-13
I.7. Incorporated by Reference ............................................................................................. I-14
II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
II.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... II-1
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page i
Table of Contents
II.2. Project Location ............................................................................................................... II-1
II.2.a. Regional Location .......................................................................................... II-1
II.2.b. Local Setting.................................................................................................. II-2
II.2.c. Surrounding Land Uses ................................................................................. II-2
II.3. Existing Conditions .......................................................................................................... II-7
II.3.a. General Plan and Zoning ............................................................................... II-7
II.3.b. Project Site ..................................................................................................... II-7
II.3.c. Public Transit and Bicycle Routes ............................................................... II-13
II.4. Public Services and Utilities........................................................................................... II-13
II.4.a. Public Services ............................................................................................ II-13
II.4.b. Utilities .......................................................................................................... II-14
II.5. Related Projects ............................................................................................................. II-14
II.6. References ..................................................................................................................... II-18
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
III.1. Project Summary ............................................................................................................ III-1
III.2. Specific Plan Requirements and Authority ..................................................................... III-2
III.3. Project Location .............................................................................................................. III-3
III.4. Existing Setting ............................................................................................................... III-4
III.4.a. Surrounding Land Uses ................................................................................ III-8
III.5. El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan ............................................................................. III-9
III.5.a. Adopted Specific Plan ................................................................................... III-9
III.5.b. Specific Plan Update..................................................................................... III-9
III.6. Project Objectives ......................................................................................................... III-31
III.7. Intended Uses of this EIR ............................................................................................. III-32
III.8. Requested Actions ........................................................................................................ III-33
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
IV.A. Aesthetics .................................................................................................................... IV.A-1
IV.A.1. Introduction............................................................................................... IV.A-1
IV.A.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................... IV.A-1
IV.A.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................... IV.A-4
IV.A.4. Environmental Impacts ............................................................................. IV.A-8
IV.A.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis .................................................................. IV.A-14
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page ii
Table of Contents
IV.A.6. Mitigation Measures ................................................................................ IV.A-15
IV.A.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation ..................................................... IV.A-15
IV.A.8. References .............................................................................................. IV.A-15
IV.B. Air Quality .................................................................................................................... IV.B-1
IV.B.1. Introduction............................................................................................... IV.B-1
IV.B.2. Pollutants and Effects ............................................................................... IV.B-1
IV.B.3. Existing Conditions................................................................................... IV.B-4
IV.B.4. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................... IV.B-8
IV.B.5. Environmental Impacts ........................................................................... IV.B-19
IV.B.6. Cumulative Impacts Analysis .................................................................. IV.B-29
IV.B.7. Mitigation Measures ................................................................................ IV.B-31
IV.B.8. Level of Significance After Mitigation ..................................................... IV.B-31
IV.B.9. References .............................................................................................. IV.B-31
IV.C. Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................... IV.C-1
IV.C.1. Introduction............................................................................................... IV.C-1
IV.C.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................... IV.C-1
IV.C.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................... IV.C-9
IV.C.4. Environmental Impacts ........................................................................... IV.C-19
IV.C.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis .................................................................. IV.C-28
IV.C.6. Mitigation Measures ................................................................................ IV.C-29
IV.C.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation ..................................................... IV.C-30
IV.C.8. References .............................................................................................. IV.C-30
IV.D. Energy......................................................................................................................... IV.D-1
IV.D.1. Introduction............................................................................................... IV.D-1
IV.D.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................... IV.D-1
IV.D.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................... IV.D-6
IV.D.4. Environmental Impacts ........................................................................... IV.D-16
IV.D.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis .................................................................. IV.D-22
IV.D.6. Mitigation Measures ................................................................................ IV.D-23
IV.D.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation ..................................................... IV.D-23
IV.D.8. References .............................................................................................. IV.D-23
IV.E. Geology and Soils ....................................................................................................... IV.E-1
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page iii
Table of Contents
IV.E.1. Introduction............................................................................................... IV.E-1
IV.E.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................... IV.E-1
IV.E.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................. IV.E-10
IV.E.4. Environmental Impacts ........................................................................... IV.E-16
IV.E.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis .................................................................. IV.E-27
IV.E.6. Mitigation Measures ................................................................................ IV.E-27
IV.E.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation ..................................................... IV.E-28
IV.E.8. References .............................................................................................. IV.E-28
IV.F. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................................IV.F-1
IV.F.1. Introduction................................................................................................IV.F-1
IV.F.2. Existing Conditions....................................................................................IV.F-1
IV.F.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ................................................IV.F-2
IV.F.4. Environmental Impacts ............................................................................IV.F-21
IV.F.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis ...................................................................IV.F-31
IV.F.6. Mitigation Measures .................................................................................IV.F-31
IV.F.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation ......................................................IV.F-32
IV.F.8. References ...............................................................................................IV.F-32
IV.G. Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................. IV.G-1
IV.G.1. Introduction............................................................................................... IV.G-1
IV.G.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................... IV.G-1
IV.G.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................. IV.G-10
IV.G.4. Environmental Impacts ........................................................................... IV.G-27
IV.G.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis .................................................................. IV.G-35
IV.G.6. Mitigation Measures ................................................................................ IV.G-36
IV.G.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation ..................................................... IV.G-36
IV.G.8. References .............................................................................................. IV.G-36
IV.H. Land Use and Planning .............................................................................................. IV.H-1
IV.H.1. Introduction............................................................................................... IV.H-1
IV.H.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................... IV.H-1
IV.H.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................... IV.H-3
IV.H.4. Environmental Impacts ........................................................................... IV.H-11
IV.H.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis .................................................................. IV.H-38
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page iv
Table of Contents
IV.H.6. Mitigation Measures ................................................................................ IV.H-39
IV.H.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation ..................................................... IV.H-39
IV.H.8. References .............................................................................................. IV.H-39
IV.I. Noise ............................................................................................................................. IV.I-1
IV.I.1.Introduction................................................................................................. IV.I-1
IV.I.2.Existing Conditions..................................................................................... IV.I-1
IV.I.3.Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................... IV.I-12
IV.I.4.Environmental Impacts ............................................................................. IV.I-18
IV.I.5.Cumulative Impacts Analysis .................................................................... IV.I-26
IV.I.6.Mitigation Measures .................................................................................. IV.I-28
IV.I.7.Level of Significance After Mitigation ....................................................... IV.I-28
IV.I.8.References ................................................................................................ IV.I-28
IV.J. Population and Housing ............................................................................................... IV.J-1
IV.J.1. Introduction................................................................................................ IV.J-1
IV.J.2. Existing Conditions.................................................................................... IV.J-1
IV.J.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ................................................ IV.J-7
IV.J.4. Environmental Impacts ............................................................................ IV.J-13
IV.J.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis ................................................................... IV.J-17
IV.J.6. Mitigation Measures ................................................................................. IV.J-19
IV.J.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation ...................................................... IV.J-19
IV.J.8. References ............................................................................................... IV.J-19
IV.K. Public Services
1. Fire Protection .................................................................................................. IV.K.1-1
IV.K.1.1. Introduction............................................................................................ IV.K.1-1
IV.K.1.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................ IV.K.1-1
IV.K.1.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................ IV.K.1-5
IV.K.1.4. Environmental Impacts ........................................................................ IV.K.1-10
IV.K.1.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis ............................................................... IV.K.1-14
IV.K.1.6. Mitigation Measures ............................................................................. IV.K.1-15
IV.K.1.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation .................................................. IV.K.1-15
IV.K.1.8. References ........................................................................................... IV.K.1-15
2. Police Protection .............................................................................................. IV.K.2-1
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page v
Table of Contents
IV.K.2.1. Introduction............................................................................................ IV.K.2-1
IV.K.2.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................ IV.K.2-1
IV.K.2.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................ IV.K.2-2
IV.K.2.4. Environmental Impacts .......................................................................... IV.K.2-6
IV.K.2.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis ................................................................. IV.K.2-9
IV.K.2.6. Mitigation Measures ............................................................................. IV.K.2-10
IV.K.2.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation .................................................. IV.K.2-10
IV.K.2.8. References ........................................................................................... IV.K.2-10
3. Schools............................................................................................................. IV.K.3-1
IV.K.3.1. Introduction............................................................................................ IV.K.3-1
IV.K.3.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................ IV.K.3-1
IV.K.3.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................ IV.K.3-3
IV.K.3.4. Environmental Impacts .......................................................................... IV.K.3-5
IV.K.3.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis ................................................................. IV.K.3-8
IV.K.3.6. Mitigation Measures ............................................................................. IV.K.3-10
IV.K.3.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation .................................................. IV.K.3-10
IV.K.3.8. References ........................................................................................... IV.K.3-10
4. Parksand Recreation...................................................................................... IV.K.4-1
IV.K.4.1. Introduction............................................................................................ IV.K.4-1
IV.K.4.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................ IV.K.4-1
IV.K.4.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................ IV.K.4-8
IV.K.4.4. Environmental Impacts ........................................................................ IV.K.4-10
IV.K.4.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis ............................................................... IV.K.4-12
IV.K.4.6. Mitigation Measures ............................................................................. IV.K.4-13
IV.K.4.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation .................................................. IV.K.4-13
IV.K.4.8. References ........................................................................................... IV.K.4-13
5. Libraries............................................................................................................ IV.K.5-1
IV.K.5.1. Introduction............................................................................................ IV.K.5-1
IV.K.5.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................ IV.K.5-1
IV.K.5.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................ IV.K.5-4
IV.K.5.4. Environmental Impacts .......................................................................... IV.K.5-5
IV.K.5.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis ................................................................. IV.K.5-6
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page vi
Table of Contents
IV.K.5.6. Mitigation Measures ............................................................................... IV.K.5-7
IV.K.5.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation .................................................... IV.K.5-7
IV.K.5.8. References ............................................................................................. IV.K.5-8
IV.L. Transportation .............................................................................................................. IV.L-1
IV.L.1. Introduction................................................................................................ IV.L-1
IV.L.2. Existing Conditions.................................................................................... IV.L-1
IV.L.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ................................................ IV.L-8
IV.L.4. Environmental Impacts ............................................................................ IV.L-20
IV.L.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis ................................................................... IV.L-44
IV.L.6. Mitigation Measures ................................................................................. IV.L-46
IV.L.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation ...................................................... IV.L-46
IV.L.8. References ............................................................................................... IV.L-46
IV.M. Tribal Cultural Resources ........................................................................................... IV.M-1
IV.M.1.Introduction............................................................................................... IV.M-1
IV.M.2.Existing Conditions................................................................................... IV.M-1
IV.M.3.Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................... IV.M-6
IV.M.4.Environmental Impacts ........................................................................... IV.M-10
IV.M.5.Cumulative Impacts Analysis .................................................................. IV.M-14
IV.M.6.Mitigation Measures ................................................................................ IV.M-14
IV.M.7.Level of Significance After Mitigation ..................................................... IV.M-15
IV.M.8.References .............................................................................................. IV.M-15
IV.N. Utilities and Service Systems
1. Water Supply and Infrastructure ...................................................................... IV.N.1-1
IV.N.1.1. Introduction............................................................................................ IV.N.1-1
IV.N.1.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................ IV.N.1-1
IV.N.1.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances .......................................... IV.N.1-10
IV.N.1.4. Environmental Impacts ........................................................................ IV.N.1-19
IV.N.1.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis ............................................................... IV.N.1-24
IV.N.1.6. Mitigation Measures ............................................................................. IV.N.1-27
IV.N.1.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation .................................................. IV.N.1-27
IV.N.1.8. References ........................................................................................... IV.N.1-28
2. Wastewater ...................................................................................................... IV.N.2-1
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page vii
Table of Contents
IV.N.2.1. Introduction............................................................................................ IV.N.2-1
IV.N.2.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................ IV.N.2-1
IV.N.2.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................ IV.N.2-4
IV.N.2.4. Environmental Impacts .......................................................................... IV.N.2-5
IV.N.2.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis ................................................................. IV.N.2-8
IV.N.2.6. Mitigation Measures ............................................................................. IV.N.2-12
IV.N.2.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation .................................................. IV.N.2-12
IV.N.2.8. References ........................................................................................... IV.N.2-12
3. Solid Waste ...................................................................................................... IV.N.3-1
IV.N.3.1. Introduction............................................................................................ IV.N.3-1
IV.N.3.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................ IV.N.3-1
IV.N.3.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................ IV.N.3-4
IV.N.3.4. Environmental Impacts .......................................................................... IV.N.3-8
IV.N.3.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis ............................................................... IV.N.3-12
IV.N.3.6. Mitigation Measures ............................................................................. IV.N.3-14
IV.N.3.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation .................................................. IV.N.3-14
IV.N.3.8. References ........................................................................................... IV.N.3-14
4. Electric Power, Natural Gas, and Telemcommunication
Infrastructure .................................................................................................... IV.N.4-1
IV.N.4.1. Introduction............................................................................................ IV.N.4-1
IV.N.4.2. Existing Conditions................................................................................ IV.N.4-1
IV.N.4.3. Relevant Plans, Policies, and Ordinances ............................................ IV.N.4-4
IV.N.4.4. Environmental Impacts .......................................................................... IV.N.4-7
IV.N.4.5. Cumulative Impacts Analysis ................................................................. IV.N.4-9
IV.N.4.6. Mitigation Measures ............................................................................. IV.N.4-10
IV.N.4.7. Level of Significance After Mitigation .................................................. IV.N.4-10
IV.N.4.8. References ........................................................................................... IV.N.4-10
V. OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
V.1. Significant Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided......................................... V-1
V.2. Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes ............................................................. V-1
V.2.a.Large Commitment of Non-Renewable Resources ...................................... V-2
V.2.b.Commitment of Future Uses .......................................................................... V-4
V.2.c. Irreverible Damage from Environmental Accidents ....................................... V-5
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page viii
Table of Contents
V.2.d.Unjustified Consumption of Resources ......................................................... V-7
V.3. Growth-Inducing Impacts ................................................................................................. V-8
V.4. Significant Effects of Mitigation Measures ...................................................................... V-9
V.4.a.Cultural Resources...................................................................................... V-10
V.4.b.Geology and Soils ........................................................................................ V-10
V.4.c. Hazards and Hazardous Materials .............................................................. V-10
V.4.d.Public Services-Fire Protection ................................................................... V-11
V.4.e.Public Services-Police Protection ................................................................ V-11
V.4.f. Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................ V-11
V.5. Effects Found Not to be Significant ............................................................................... V-11
V.5.a.Aesthetics ..................................................................................................... V-12
V.5.b.Agriculture and Forestry Resources ............................................................ V-13
V.5.c. Biological Resources ................................................................................... V-13
V.5.d.Geology and Soils ....................................................................................... VI-15
V.5.e.Hazards and Hazardous Materials .............................................................. V-17
V.5.f. Hydrology and Water Quality ....................................................................... V-18
V.5.g.Land Use and Planning ............................................................................... V-20
V.5.h.Mineral Resources ....................................................................................... V-20
V.5.i. Noise............................................................................................................ V-21
V.5.j. Transportation .............................................................................................. V-22
V.5.k. Wildfire ......................................................................................................... V-23
V.6. References ..................................................................................................................... V-23
VI. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT
VI.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... VI-1
VI.2. Project Objectives ........................................................................................................... VI-2
VI.3. Significant and Unavoidable Impacts ............................................................................. VI-2
VI.4. Alternatives Considered and Eliminated During the Project Planning Process ............ VI-3
VI.4.a. Alternate Site Alternative .............................................................................. VI-3
VI.5. Alternatives Analysis Format .......................................................................................... VI-3
VI.6. Alternatives to the Project ............................................................................................... VI-4
VI.6.a. Alternative A-No Project Alternative ............................................................. VI-4
VI.6.b. Alternative B-Reduced Specific Plan Development Alternative ................. VI-16
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page ix
Table of Contents
VI.6.c. Alternative C-Adopted El Segundo Specific Plan Boundary Alternative ... VI-29
VI.7. Summary of Alternatives to the Project ........................................................................ VI-41
VI.8. Environmental Superior Alternative .............................................................................. VI-43
VI.9. References .................................................................................................................... VI-44
VII. PREPARERS OF THE EIR AND PERSONS CONSULTED ........................................ VII-1
VIII. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................... VIII-1
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page x
Table of Contents
APPENDICES
Appendix A NOP, Initial Study, NOP Public Comments
o Appendix A.1 Notice of Preparation
o Appendix A.2 Initial Study
o Appendix A.3 NOP Public Comments
Appendix B El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
Appendix C Air Quality Study
Appendix D Cultural Resources
o Appendix D.1 Historical Report
o Appendix D.2 Paleontological Resources Letter
o Appendix D.3 South Coastal Information Center
Appendix E Energy Calculations
Appendix F Greenhouse Gas Study
Appendix G Noise Study
Appendix H Public Services Agency Letters
Appendix ITransportation and Traffic
o Appendix I.1 Transportation Assessment Report
o Appendix I.2 Local Transportation Assessment Report
Appendix J AB 52 Consultation Documentation
Appendix K Water Supply Assessment
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page xi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure II-1, Regional Location Map ............................................................................................. II-3
Figure II-2, Views of Surrounding Uses....................................................................................... II-4
Figure II-3, Views of Surrounding Uses....................................................................................... II-5
Figure II-4, Views of Surrounding Uses....................................................................................... II-6
Figure II-5, Aerial Map of Downtown El Segundo Specific Plan Update Area ........................... II-8
Figure II-6, Views of the Project Site...........................................................................................II-9
Figure II-7, Views of the Project Site ......................................................................................... II-10
Figure II-8, Views of the Project Site ......................................................................................... II-11
Figure II-9, Views of the Project Site ......................................................................................... II-12
Figure II-10, Location of Related Projects ................................................................................. II-19
Figure III-1, Specific Plan Update Project Boundary.................................................................. III-5
Figure III-2, Existing Land Use Designations ............................................................................. III-6
Figure III-3, Existing Zoning ........................................................................................................ III-7
Figure III-4, Proposed Specific Plan Districts .................................................................. III-11
Figure III-5, Proposed Land Use Designations ........................................................................ III-14
Figure III-6, Proposed Zoning ................................................................................................... III-15
Figure IV.C-1, Potential Historic District ................................................................................. IV.C-7
Figure IV.E-1, Quaternary Faults............................................................................................ IV.E-3
Figure IV.I-1, Noise Monitoring and Sensitive Receptor Locations ....................................... IV.I-10
Figure IV.K.4-1, El Segundo Parks and Facilities ............................................................... IV.K.4-2
Figure IV.K.5-1, El Segundo Pubic Library Locations ......................................................... IV.K.5-2
Figure IV.L-1, Transporation Study Area................................................................................. IV.L-2
Figure IV.L-2, Existing Transit Routes ..................................................................................... IV.L-5
Figure IV.L-3, Existing Bicycle Facilities.................................................................................. IV.L-7
Figure IV.M-1, 1860-1937 Historical Map............................................................................. IV.M-13
Figure IV.N.1-1, Water Supply Map .................................................................................. IV.N.1-11
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page xii
LIST OF TABLES
Table ES-1, Summary of Project Impacts, Project Design Features,
and Migitation Measures ........................................................................................................... ES-9
Table I-1, Summary of NOP Comments....................................................................................... I-9
Table II-1, List of Related Projects ............................................................................................ II-16
Table III-1, Anticipated Downtown Specific Plan Area Development Through 2040 .............. III-12
Table III-2, Development Standards for Main Street District ................................................... III-16
Table III-3, Development Standards for Richmond Street District ........................................... III-18
Table III-4, Development Standards for Grand Avenue District .............................................. III-21
Table III-5, Development Standards for Civic Center District .................................................. III-24
Table III-6, On-Street Parking Supply Comparison.................................................................. III-30
Table IV.A-1, Consistency with General Plan Aesthetic Goals and Policies ....................... IV.A-10
Table IV.B-1, State and Federal Ambient Quality Standards and Attainment
for L.A. County ................................................................................................................... IV.B-4
Table IV.B-2, Ambient Air Quality Data
Los Angeles County ................................................................................................................ IV.B-5
Table IV.B-3, SCAQMD Construction Emissions Thresholds.............................................. IV.B-20
Table IV.B-4, SCAQMD Operational Emissions Thresholds ............................................... IV.B-21
Table IV.B-5, Specific Plan Buildout, Average, and Worst-Case Construction Estimates .. IV.B-25
Table IV.B-6, Maximum Regional and Localized Daily Construction Emissions ................. IV.B-26
Table IV.B-7, Regional and Localized Operational Emissions ............................................ IV.B-27
Table IV.C-1, Properties in Potentially Eligible Historic District ............................................. IV.C-4
Table IV.E-1, Summary of Nearby Faults............................................................................... IV.E-4
Table IV.F-1, Consistency Analysis: El Segundo Climate Action Plan .................................IV.F-28
Table IV.F-2, Construction-Related GHG Emissions ............................................................IV.F-30
Table IV.F-3, Operations-Related GHG Emissions (Full Buildout 2040) ..............................IV.F-30
Table IV.G-1, DTSC EnviroStor Database Active Sites in El Segundo ................................. IV.G-6
Table IV.G-2, Open Geotracker Sites in El Segundo............................................................. IV.G-7
Table IV.H-1, Consistency with the Applicable Goals, Objectives, and Policies
of the General Plan ............................................................................................................... IV.H-13
Table IV.I-1, Decibel Scale and Common Noise Sources ....................................................... IV.I-2
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page xiii
Table of Contents
Table IV.I-2, Existing Noise Levels ......................................................................................... IV.I-11
Table IV.I-3, Construction Vibration Damage Criteria ............................................................ IV.I-12
Table IV.I-4, Groundborne Vibration and Groundborne Noise Impact Criteria for General
Assessment ................................................................................................................... IV.I-13
Table IV.I-5, Guidelines for Noise Compatible Land Use ...................................................... IV.I-14
Table IV.I-6, Caltrans Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria .................................. IV.I-15
Table IV.I-7, Caltrans Vibration Annoyance Potential Threshold Criteria .............................. IV.I-16
Table IV.I-8, Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels .................................................. IV.I-20
Table IV.I-9, Traffic Noise Levels from Full Project Buildout ................................................. IV.I-24
Table IV.I-10, Typical Construction Equipment Groundborne Vibration Levels.................... IV.I-24
Table IV.J-1, SCAG Regional Population, Households, and Employment Forecasts ........... IV.J-2
Table IV.J-2, City and County Resident Growth and Forecasts 2016-2045........................... IV.J-3
Table IV.J-3, City and County Household Growth and Forecasts 2016-2045 ....................... IV.J-4
Table IV.J-4, City and County Employment Growth and Forecasts 2016-2045 ..................... IV.J-5
Table IV.J-5, 1992 General Plan Buildout Projections for 2010 ............................................. IV.J-5
th
Table IV.J-6, Cycle RHNA Allocation Plan ......................................................... IV.J-11
Table IV.J-7, Employment Estimate ...................................................................................... IV.J-16
Table IV.J-8, Cumulative Population and Housing ............................................................... IV.J-18
Table IV.K.1-1, ESFD Major Incidents................................................................................ IV.K.1-2
Table IV.K.1-2, Fire Stations Serving the Project Site ........................................................ IV.K.1-3
Table IV.K.1-3, ESFD Travel Time By Fire Unit .................................................................. IV.K.1-4
Table IV.K.1-4, ESFD First Unit Travel Time ...................................................................... IV.K.1-4
Table IV.K.3-1, Public Schools Serving the Project Area ................................................... IV.K.3-2
Table IV.K.3-2, ESUSD Student Generation Factors ......................................................... IV.K.3-2
Table IV.K.3-3, ESUSD Project Student Generation .......................................................... IV.K.3-7
Table IV.K.3-4, Total Cumulative Student Generation ........................................................ IV.K.3-9
Table IV.K.4-1, Parks and Facilities in the City of El Segundo ........................................... IV.K.4-3
Table IV.K.5-1, El Segundo Public Library Benchmarks .................................................... IV.K.5-3
Table IV.K.5-2, Cumulative Impacts to Library Benchmarks .............................................. IV.K.5-7
Table IV.L-1, Significance Threshold Criteria and Methodology .......................................... IV.L-21
Table IV.L-2, VMT Threshold of Significance Evaluation Method ........................................ IV.L-21
Table IV.L-3, Thresholds of Significance SB 743 Guidelines ............................................ IV.L-22
Table IV.L-4, Project Consistency with the Circulation Element ........................................... IV.L-25
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page xiv
Table of Contents
Table IV.L-5, Project Consistency with the South Bay BMP................................................. IV.L-35
Table IV.L-6, Project VMT Metrics......................................................................................... IV.L-37
Table IV.L-7, Project Preferred Road Section ....................................................................... IV.L-39
Table IV.L-8, Medical Access to Centinela Hospital Medical Center.................................... IV.L-43
Table IV.M-1, Archaeological Resources Search Results ..................................................... IV.M-5
Table IV.N.1-1, El Segundo Current and Projected Population .......................................... IV.N.1-4
Table IV.N.1-2, El Segundo Emergency Connections ........................................................ IV.N.1-5
Table IV.N.1-3, Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison for WBMWD ................... IV.N.1-6
Table IV.N.1-4, Multiple-Dry Years Supply and Demand Comparison ............................... IV.N.1-7
Table IV.N.1-5, Future System Demand Projections (Without Additional Development) .. IV.N.1-8
Table IV.N.1-6, El Segundo Water Demand Management Measures ................................ IV.N.1-9
Table IV.N.1-7, Normal Year Demand for WBMWD ......................................................... IV.N.1-24
Table IV.N.1-8, Projected Annual Net New Demands (AFY)............................................ IV.N.1-25
Table IV.N.1-9, Projected Total System Demand with Development Projects ................. IV.N.1-26
Table IV.N.2-1, Existing Capacity of Hyperion Sanitary Sewer System ............................. IV.N.2-2
Table IV.N.2-2, Project Estimated Sewage Generation ...................................................... IV.N.2-6
Table IV.N.2-3, Cumulative Wastewater Generation .......................................................... IV.N.2-9
Table IV.N.3-1, Solid Waste Facilities ................................................................................. IV.N.3-2
Table IV.N.3-2, Cumulative Solid Waste Generation ........................................................ IV.N.3-13
Table VI-1, Alternative B Reduced Specific Plan Development Summary .............................. VI-17
Table VI-2, Comparison of Project and Alternatives Impacts .................................................. VI-41
Table VI-3, Comparison of Alternatives Meeting the Project Objectives .............................. VI-43
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan City of El Segundo
Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2024
Page xv
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
I. Introduction
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
II. Environmental Setting
NBSJQPTB!!!BWFOVF
D
PS
JT
O
D
U
D
I
B
P
N
O
S
E
P
E
B
O
QJOF!!!BWFOVF
!
!
S
!E
!
T
E
!
U!
!
!
T
!
F
S
!
!
U
TV
F
S
U
F
D
F
S
U
B
F
F
M
U
F
Z
NU
Q
U
B
V
J
O
T
!
!
!
!
!
!
T
!
E
U
S
S
J
F
IPMMZ!!!BWFOVFW
F
F
W
U
J
S
H
J
O
J
B
!
!
!
!
T
U
S
F
F
U
HSBOE!!!BWFOVF
GSBOLMJO!!!BWFOVF
FM!!!TFHVOEP!!!CPVMFWBSE
S
JNBSJQPTB!!!BWFOVF
D
I
N
P
O
E
!
!
!
T
U
D
S
P
F
T
O
F
U
D
UB
P
O
S
E
E
B
QJOF!!!BWFOVF
!
!
S
!
!
T
E
U
!
!
F
S
!
!
TV
F
U
F
D
S
U
B
F
M
F
Z
NU
Q
U
B
V
J
O
T
!
!
!
!
!
!
T
!
E
U
S
S
J
F
IPMMZ!!!BWFOVFW
F
F
W
U
J
S
H
J
O
J
B
!
!
!
!
T
U
S
F
F
U
HSBOE!!!BWFOVF
GSBOLMJO!!!BWFOVF
FM!!!TFHVOEP!!!CPVMFWBSE
S
JNBSJQPTB!!!BWFOVF
D
I
N
P
O
E
!
!
!
T
U
D
S
P
F
T
O
F
U
D
UB
P
O
S
E
E
B
QJOF!!!BWFOVF
!
!
S
!
!
T
E
U
!
!
F
S
!
!
TV
F
U
F
D
S
U
B
F
M
F
Z
NU
Q
U
B
V
J
O
T
!
!
!
!
!
!
T
!
E
U
S
S
J
F
IPMMZ!!!BWFOVFW
F
F
W
U
J
S
H
J
O
J
B
!
!
!
!
T
U
S
F
F
U
HSBOE!!!BWFOVF
GSBOLMJO!!!BWFOVF
FM!!!TFHVOEP!!!CPVMFWBSE
NBSJQPTB!!!BWFOVF
D
S
P
JT
O
D
U
D
I
B
P
N
O
S
E
P
E
B
O
QJOF!!!BWFOVF
!
!
S
!
E
!
T
E
!
!
U
!
!
T
!
F
S
!
!
U
V
T
F
S
U
F
D
F
S
U
B
F
F
M
U
F
Z
N
U
Q
U
B
V
J
O
T
!
!
!
!
!
!
T
!
E
U
S
S
J
F
IPMMZ!!!BWFOVF
W
F
F
W
U
J
S
H
J
O
J
B
!
!
!
!
T
U
S
F
F
U
HSBOE!!!BWFOVF
GSBOLMJO!!!BWFOVF
FM!!!TFHVOEP!!!CPVMFWBSE
S
JNBSJQPTB!!!BWFOVF
D
I
N
P
O
E
!
!
!
T
U
D
S
P
F
T
O
F
U
D
UB
P
O
S
E
E
B
QJOF!!!BWFOVF
!
!
S
!
!
T
E
U
!
!
F
S
!
!
TV
F
U
F
D
S
U
B
F
M
F
Z
NU
Q
U
B
V
J
O
T
!
!
!
!
!
!
T
!
E
U
S
S
J
F
IPMMZ!!!BWFOVFW
F
F
W
U
J
S
H
J
O
J
B
!
!
!
!
T
U
S
F
F
U
HSBOE!!!BWFOVF
GSBOLMJO!!!BWFOVF
FM!!!TFHVOEP!!!CPVMFWBSE
S
JNBSJQPTB!!!BWFOVF
D
I
N
P
O
E
!
!
!
T
U
D
S
P
F
T
O
F
U
D
UB
P
O
S
E
E
B
QJOF!!!BWFOVF
!
!
S
!
!
T
E
U
!
!
F
S
!
!
TV
F
U
F
D
S
U
B
F
M
F
Z
NU
Q
U
B
V
J
O
T
!
!
!
!
!
!
T
!
E
U
S
S
J
F
IPMMZ!!!BWFOVFW
F
F
W
U
J
S
H
J
O
J
B
!
!
!
!
T
U
S
F
F
U
HSBOE!!!BWFOVF
GSBOLMJO!!!BWFOVF
FM!!!TFHVOEP!!!CPVMFWBSE
S
JNBSJQPTB!!!BWFOVF
D
I
N
P
O
E
!
!
!
T
U
D
S
P
F
T
O
F
U
D
UB
N
P
O
B
S
E
EJ
O
B
QJOF!!!BWFOVF
!
!
!
S
!
!
!
!
T
T
E
U
U
!
!
F
S
S!
!
TV
F
F
U
F
D
F
S
U
UB
F
M
F
Z
U
Q
U
V
T
!
!
!
!
E
S
J
IPMMZ!!!BWFOVFW
F
W
J
S
H
J
O
J
B
!
!
!
!
T
U
S
F
F
U
HSBOE!!!BWFOVF
GSBOLMJO!!!BWFOVF
FM!!!TFHVOEP!!!CPVMFWBSE
S
JNBSJQPTB!!!BWFOVF
D
I
N
P
O
E
!
!
!
T
U
D
S
P
F
T
O
F
U
D
UB
N
P
O
B
S
E
EJ
O
B
QJOF!!!BWFOVF
!
!
!
S
!
!
!
!
T
T
E
U
U
!
!
F
S
S!
!
TV
F
F
U
F
D
F
S
U
UB
F
M
F
Z
U
Q
U
V
T
!
!
!
!
E
S
J
IPMMZ!!!BWFOVFW
F
W
J
S
H
J
O
J
B
!
!
!
!
T
U
S
F
F
U
HSBOE!!!BWFOVF
GSBOLMJO!!!BWFOVF
FM!!!TFHVOEP!!!CPVMFWBSE
ŷĻ IƚǒƭźƓŭ 9ƌĻƒĻƓƷ ŷğƭ ĬĻĻƓ źƓĭƌǒķĻķ ğƭ ğ wĻƌğƷĻķ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ͵ ŷĻ IƚǒƭźƓŭ 9ƌĻƒĻƓƷ źƭ ğ ƦƚƌźĭǤ ķƚĭǒƒĻƓƷ ƷŷğƷ ķƚĻƭ ƓƚƷ
ķźƩĻĭƷƌǤ ğƦƦƩƚǝĻ ķĻǝĻƌƚƦƒĻƓƷ ƦƩƚƆĻĭƷƭͳ ŷƚǞĻǝĻƩͲ źƷ ŷğƭ ĬĻĻƓ źƓĭƌǒķĻķ źƓ ğƓ ĻŅŅƚƩƷ Ʒƚ ƦƩƚǝźķĻ ƷŷĻ ƒƚƭƷ ĭƚƓƭĻƩǝğƷźǝĻ
ğƭƭǒƒƦƷźƚƓƭ ğƓķ ğƓğƌǤƭźƭ ƚŅ ƦƚƷĻƓƷźğƌ ĭǒƒǒƌğƷźǝĻ źƒƦğĭƷƭ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ͵ ŷĻ IƚǒƭźƓŭ 9ƌĻƒĻƓƷ źķĻƓƷźŅźĻƭ ğ ƌźƭƷ ƚŅ ƭźƷĻƭ
ƷŷğƷ Ǟźƌƌ ĬĻ ƩĻǩƚƓĻķ Ʒƚ ğƌƌƚǞ ŅƚƩ ŷźŭŷĻƩ ķĻƓƭźƷǤ ƩĻƭźķĻƓƷźğƌ ķĻǝĻƌƚƦƒĻƓƷ͵ ŷĻƭĻ ƩĻǩƚƓĻķ ƭźƷĻƭ ğƩĻ ƌƚĭğƷĻķ ǞźƷŷźƓ ƷŷĻ
ƓƚƩƷŷǞĻƭƷ ƨǒğķƩğƓƷ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ ƚǒƷƭźķĻ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ĬƚǒƓķğƩźĻƭ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ ğƩĻğ͵ ŷĻƩĻŅƚƩĻͲ ƷŷĻƩĻ
Ǟƚǒƌķ ĬĻ Ɠƚ ƭźŭƓźŅźĭğƓƷ ĭǒƒǒƌğƷźǝĻ źƒƦğĭƷƭ ǒƓķĻƩ ƷŷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ ğƭƭƚĭźğƷĻķ ǞźƷŷ ƷŷĻ IƚǒƭźƓŭ 9ƌĻƒĻƓƷ͵ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚͲ
/ƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ 5ĻǝĻƌƚƦƒĻƓƷ 5ĻƦğƩƷƒĻƓƷͲ IƚǒƭźƓŭ 9ƌĻƒĻƓƷͲ {ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЋͲ ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ
ŷƷƷƦƭʹΉΉǞǞǞ͵ĻƌƭĻŭǒƓķƚ͵ƚƩŭΉŷƚƒĻΉƭŷƚǞƦǒĬƌźƭŷĻķķƚĭǒƒĻƓƷΉЏБЉАΉЏЌБЊЎЏЉВЉЍЌБЉАЉЉЉЉ͵
556!O/!Epvhmbt!.!Ebub!Dfoufs!Qibtf!3
23
24
2:61.2:71!F/!Hsboe!Bwf/
252!Fvdbmzquvt!Es/
251!Psfhpo!Tu/
9
22
21
Cfbdi!Djujft!Nfejb!Dbnqvt
312.31:!Sjdinpoe!Tu/
Tujdl!o!Tufjo!Njyfe!Vtf
8
67
5
Qspkfdu!Bsfb
Ipvtjoh!Fmfnfou
2
MFHFOE
III. Project Description
MARIPOSA AVE
PINE AVE
STANDARD ST
EUCALYPTUS DR
HOLLY AVE
CONCORD ST
MAIN ST
RICHMOND ST
GRAND AVE
FRANKLIN AVE
EL SEGUNDO BLVD
LEGEND
Project Area Boundary
Single-Family ResidentialDowntown Commercial
Downtown
Two-Family ResidentialGeneral Commercial
Specific Plan
Multi-Family ResidentialPublic Facilities
Smoky Hollow
Heavy Industrial
Parks
Parking
NBSJQPTB!!!BWF
QJOF!!BWF
IPMMZ!!!BWF
NBJO!!!TU
TUBOEBSE!!!TU
DPODPSE!!!TU
FVDBMZQUVT!!!ES
SJDINPOE!!!TU
F
W
B
!
!
!
E
O
B
S
H
OBSLFUQMBDF!!BMMFZ
GSBOLMJO!!BWF
FM!!TFHVOEP!!CMWE
NBSJQPTB!!!BWF
QJOF!!BWF
IPMMZ!!!BWF
NBJO!!!TU
TUBOEBSE!!!TU
DPODPSE!!!TU
FVDBMZQUVT!!!ES
SJDINPOE!!!TU
F
W
B
!
!
!
E
O
B
S
H
OBSLFUQMBDF!!BMMFZ
GSBOLMJO!!BWF
FM!!TFHVOEP!!CMWE
9!Ofx!Qbsdfmt
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
A. Aesthetics
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
B. Air Quality
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
C. Cultural Resources
Tpvsdf;!Ufsftb!Hsjnft-!Nbz!3134/
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
D. Energy
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
E. Geology and Soils
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
F. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
G. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
7
https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-sites-where-you-live
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
H. Land Use and Planning
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
I. Noise
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
J. Population and Housing
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
K. Public Services
1. Fire Protection
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
K. Public Services
2. Police Protection
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
K. Public Services
3. Schools
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
K. Public Services
4. Parks and Recreation
Dbnqvt!Fm!Tfhvoep
Djuz!Cpvoebsz
Brvbujdt!Dfoufs
Djuz!pg!Fm!Tfhvoep
Joefqfoefodf!Qbsl
Gsffepn!Qbsl
Tzdbnpsf!Qbsl
Ijmmupq!Qbsl
Hfpshf!Csfuu!Gjfme
Dmvuufst!Qbsl
Kptmzo!Dfoufs
Sfdsfbujpo!Qbsl
boe!
Tlbuf!Qbsl
Dmvcipvtf
Uffo!Dfoufs
Hfpshf!F!Hpsepo
Mjcsbsz!Qbsl
Tufqifotpo!Gjfme
Jnqfsjbm!Tusjq!'
Nfnpsz!Usff!Spx
Dboez!Dbof!Qbsl
Vsip!Tbbsj!Txjn!Tubejvn
Sjdinpoe!Tusffu!Gjfme
Bdbejb!Qbsl
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
K. Public Services
5. Libraries
Dfoufs!Tusffu!
Fmfnfoubsz!Tdippm
Fm!Tfhvoep
Njeemf!Tdippm
Fm!Tfhvoep!Ijhi!Tdippm
Fm!Tfhvoep!Qvcmjd!Mjcsbsz
Fmfnfoubsz
Sjdinpoe!Tusffu
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
L. Transportation
O
o
21:
21:
O
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
M. Tribal Cultural Resources
A.
B.
C.
D.
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
N. Utilities and Service Systems
1. Water Supply and Infrastructure
High Pressure Potable Zone
Low Pressure
Potable Zone
Potable WaterNon-Potable Water
Downtown Specific Plan Update
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
N. Utilities and Service Systems
2. Wastewater
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
N. Utilities and Service Systems
3. Solid Waste
IV.Environmental Impact Analysis
N. Utilities and Service Systems
4. Electric Power, Natural Gas, and
Telecommunications Infrastructure
V. Other CEQA Considerations
.
5
VI. Alternatives To The Proposed Project
o
o
o
LTS(M)
LTS(M)
LTS(M)
LTS(M)
To attract investment and
increase the economic vitality of
Downtown El Segundo to foster
an active center serving
residents, visitors, and local
workers
To promote a range of housing
options with opportunities for all
incomes
To improve walkability and the
pedestrian environment and
support enhanced and efficient
mobility opportunities for walking,
driving, bicycling, and transit
VII.Preparers of the EIR and Persons
Consulted
VIII.Acronyms and Abbreviations
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Appendices
State Clearinghouse No. 2023010196
Prepared for:
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, California 90245
Prepared by:
EcoTierra Consulting, Inc.
thth
633 W. 5 Street, 26 Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
February 2, 2024
Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material.
APPENDICES
Appendix A NOP, Initial Study, NOP Public Comments
Appendix A.1 Notice of Preparation
Appendix A.2 Initial Study
Appendix A.3 NOP Public Comments
Appendix B El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
Appendix C Air Quality Study
Appendix D Cultural Resources
Appendix D.1 Historical Report
Appendix D.2 Paleontological Resources Letter
Appendix D.3 South Coastal Information Center Letter
Appendix E Energy Calculations
Appendix F Greenhouse Gas Study
Appendix G Noise Study
Appendix H Public Services Agency Letters
Appendix I Transportation and Traffic
Appendix I.1 Transportation Assessment Report
Appendix I.2 Local Transportation Assessment Report
Appendix J AB 52 Consultation Documentation
Appendix K Water Supply Assessment
APPENDIX A.1: NOTICE OF PREPARATION
NOTICE OF PREPARATION
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
City Project No.: Environmental Assessment No. EA 1311, General Plan Amendment No. GPA 21-
01, Zone Change No. ZC 21-01, and Specific Plan Amendment No. SPA 21-01
Project Name: El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
Project Address: Downtown El Segundo (see Figures 1 and 2 for project location and project area
boundary)
Public Comment Period: January 12, 2023 through February 13, 2023
Public Scoping Meeting: February 2, 2023 from 5:30 PM to 7:00 PM
Public Scoping Meeting Location: City Hall Council Chambers
350 Main Street, El Segundo 90245
Pursuant to Section 21165 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15050 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the City of El Segundo (City) is the Lead Agency for the preparation
of a Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the proposed El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan
Update Project (Specific Plan/project). In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15082, the City has prepared
this Notice of Preparation (NOP) to provide responsible and trustee agencies, the Office of Planning and Research,
and the County Clerk with sufficient information describing the project and its potential environmental effects to
enable the responsible agencies to make a meaningful response to this NOP.
The City is requesting your agency’s specific and detailed input regarding the scope and content of the
environmental information related to your agency’s statutory responsibility that must be included in the Draft
PEIR. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15083, this NOP also serves to facilitate consultation with any persons
or organizations that may be concerned with the environmental effects of the Project. Additionally, this NOP
serves as a notice for the public Scoping Meeting, which is held to expedite and facilitate the consultation process.
The City of El Segundo has reviewed the above project and has prepared an Initial Study in accordance with
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15070.
Project Location. The Specific Plan Update area (project area) is in Downtown El Segundo, in the northwest
quadrant of the City of El Segundo. The project area is approximately 43.8 acres in size. The project area is irregular
in shape with portions extending to Eucalyptus Drive to the east, El Segundo Boulevard to the south, Concord
Street to the west, and Mariposa Avenue to the north. The project area is currently developed with a wide range
of commercial, residential, and public uses. The project area location is shown in Figure 1, Regional Location and
Figure 2, Specific Plan Update Project Boundary.
Project Description Overview. The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan, which
serves as land use and zoning for properties within the boundaries of the Specific Plan area. The project would
revise the existing Specific Plan planning districts, amend General Plan and zoning designations on eight parcels,
City of El Segundo Page 1 Notice of Preparation
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Project
and include mobility enhancements. The project would include public improvements and streetscape guidelines,
private urban form criteria, permitted land uses, development standards, mobility and infrastructure
improvements, an implementation plan, and administration processes.
The Specific Plan Update proposes to expand the boundaries of the Downtown Specific Plan area to include eight
parcels located on Standard Street to the north and south of Grand Avenue. The project proposes amendments
to the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan to change the land use designation on eight parcels from
Downtown Commercial to Downtown Specific Plan. The project would also amend the City’s zoning map to change
the zoning on eight parcels from Downtown Commercial (C-RS) to Downtown Specific Plan (DSP). The existing and
proposed land use and zoning are shown in Figures 3 through 6.
The project is proposed to accommodate future market demand in the project area. Potential demand within the
project area (through 2040) is projected as follows (rounded):
PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGE IN DOWNTOWN EL SEGUNDO
Proposed
Retail and Restaurant 130,000 square feet
Office 200,000 square feet
Medical Office 24,000 square feet
Residential Units 300 units
In addition to land use and zoning changes, the project would include mobility enhancements including expanding
pedestrian areas along portions of Main Street, Richmond Street, and Grand Avenue, which would create potential
changes to the number of travel lanes on those streets. The project would eliminate a portion of an existing truck
route that is located on Main Street between El Segundo Boulevard and Grand Avenue; proposes the potential
closure of a portion of Richmond Street to vehicles, generally from Franklin Avenue to Grand Avenue to create a
permanent pedestrian only street for outdoor dining and gathering; and include buffered bicycle lanes on Main
Street and Grand Avenue. The project would include pedestrian and transit improvements in the project area.
including widened sidewalks. Transit improvements could include bus stop enhancements and potentially new
and/or relocated bus stops. Widened sidewalks would also provide expanded outdoor seating and dining areas
for area restaurants.
The project would include modifications to parking standards and strategies and alternatives for on-street parking
and two new parking structures at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Standard Street and the northeast
corner of Richmond and Franklin. Lastly, the 2000 Specific Plan area was previously divided into six districts and
the Specific Plan update would adjust the Specific Plan area into four distinct districts: Main Street, Richmond
Street, Grand Avenue, and Civic Center districts. Figure 7, Proposed Specific Plan Districts, shows the four districts.
Potential Environmental Effects of the Project. The project could have potentially significant environmental
impacts to the following environmental topic areas: Aesthetics; Air Quality; Cultural Resources; Energy;
Greenhouse Gas Emissions; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Land Use and Planning; Noise; Paleontology;
Population and Housing; Public Services and Recreation; Transportation; Tribal Cultural Resources; and
Utilities/Service Systems.
City of El Segundo Page 2 Notice of Preparation
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Project
Because of the existing condition of the projectarea, which is fully developed and located in an urbanized setting,
implementation of the Specific Plan is not expected to result in any significant impacts to: Agriculture and Forestry
Resources; Biological Resources; Geology/Soils; Mineral Resources; and Wildfire. TheCity is proposing to “scope
out” these topics fromthe Draft PEIR without further study, as summarized in this NOP’s Appendix A, Initial Study.
This NOP, including Appendix A, isavailable for electronic download on the City’s website at:
https://www.elsegundo.org/downtownupdate.
Public Scoping Meeting.The project Scoping Meeting will be held in person at the location noted below. The
Scoping Meetingwillinvolve a presentation about the proposed projectand the environmental review process
and schedule. The purpose of the meeting is tofacilitate the receipt of written comments about the scope and
content of the environmental analysis to be addressed in the Draft PEIR. The Scoping Meetingis forinformation-
gathering, is not a public hearing, and no public testimony will be taken. No decisions about the Project will be
made at the Scoping Meeting. A separate public hearing for entitlement requests will be scheduled after the
completion of the Draft PEIR. The date, time, and websiteof the project’s Scoping Meeting are as follows:
Dateand Time: February 2, 2023 from 5:30 PM to 7:00 PM
Scoping Meeting Location: City Hall Council Chambers
350 Main Street, El Segundo 90245
Submitting Comments. The City will consider all written comments regarding the potential environmental effects
of the project receivedduring the NOP public review period. All written comments receivedwill be reviewed and
considered by the City as part of the environmental analysis of the proposed projectand will become a part of the
public record for the Draft PEIR. Written comments will be accepted duringthe Scoping Meeting, via email, and/or
via mail, and must be received bythe City by 5:00 P.M., February 13, 2023. Please direct your written comments
to Paul Samaras, City of El Segundo, Community DevelopmentDepartment, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA
90245, or email psamaras@elsegundo.org.
1/6/2023
______________________________________________ ___________________
Paul Samaras, AICP Date
Principal Planner
City of El SegundoPage 3 Notice of Preparation
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Project
QSPKFDU!TJUF
Qspkfdu!Bsfb
Tpvsdf;!PqfoTusffuNbqt!boe!Hpphmf!Nbqt-!Efdfncfs!3133/
Gjhvsf!2
Sfhjpobm!Mpdbujpo!Nbq
MARIPOSA AVE
PINE AVE
HOLLY AVE
GRAND AVE
FRANKLIN AVE
4136-027-010
EL SEGUNDO BLVD
LEGEND
Project Area Boundary
Single-Family ResidentialDowntown Commercial
Downtown
Two-Family ResidentialGeneral Commercial
Specific Plan
Multi-Family ResidentialPublic Facilities
Smoky Hollow
Heavy Industrial
Parks
Parking
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!3
Tqfdjgjd!Qmbo!Vqebuf!Qspkfdu!Cpvoebsz
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!4
Fyjtujoh!Mboe!Vtf!Eftjhobujpot
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!5
Qspqptfe!Mboe!Vtf!Eftjhobujpot
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!6
Fyjtujoh!\[pojoh
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!7
Qspqptfe!\[pojoh
NBSJQPTB!!!BWF
QJOF!!BWF
IPMMZ!!!BWF
GSBOLMJO!!BWF
FM!!TFHVOEP!!CMWE
Gjhvsf!8
Qspqptfe!Tqfdjgjd!Qmbo!Ejtusjdut
APPENDIX A.2: INITIAL STUDY
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
UPDATE
INITIAL STUDY
January 2023
Community DevelopmentDepartment
350MainStreet
ElSegundo,CA90245(310)524-2380
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. I-1
A. INTRODUCTION AND REGULATORY GUIDANCE .................................................................... I-1
B. LEAD AGENCY ........................................................................................................................ I-1
C. PURPOSE AND DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION ........................................................................ I-1
II. INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST ................................................................................................ II-1
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................... II-1
B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ....................................................... II-15
C. DETERMINATION ................................................................................................................ II-15
D. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .................................................................... II-16
1. Aesthetics ................................................................................................................... II-17
2. Agriculture and Forestry Resources............................................................................ II-20
3. Air Quality ................................................................................................................... II-21
4. Biological Resources ................................................................................................... II-26
5. Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................... II-29
6. Energy ......................................................................................................................... II-31
7. Geology and Soils ........................................................................................................ II-33
8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ......................................................................................... II-38
9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials .............................................................................. II-40
10. Hydrology and Water Quality ..................................................................................... II-44
11. Land Use and Planning ................................................................................................ II-48
12. Mineral Resources ...................................................................................................... II-50
13. Noise ........................................................................................................................... II-51
14. Population and Housing .............................................................................................. II-54
15. Public Services ............................................................................................................ II-56
16. Recreation ................................................................................................................... II-59
17. Transportation ............................................................................................................ II-61
18. Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................ II-64
19. Utilities and Service Systems ...................................................................................... II-66
20. Wildfire ....................................................................................................................... II-68
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance............................................................................ II-70
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1, Regional Location Map................................................................................................................II-2
Figure 2, Specific Plan Update Project Boundary....................................................................................... II-3
Figure 3, Existing Land Use Designations ................................................................................................... II-5
Figure 4, Proposed Land Use Designations ................................................................................................ II-6
Figure 5,Existing Zoning.............................................................................................................................II-7
Figure 6, Proposed Zoning ......................................................................................................................... II-8
Figure 7, Proposed Specific Plan Districts .................................................................................................. II-9
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1, Proposed Land Use Increase in Downtown El Segundo ............................................................. II-14
Table 2, South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status ................................................................................... II-22
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
ii
I. INTRODUCTION
A.INTRODUCTION AND REGULATORY GUIDANCE
An Initial Study (IS) is conducted by a lead agency to determine if a project may have a significant effect on
the environment (CEQA Guidelines Section 15063\[a\]). If there is substantial evidence that a project may have
a significant effect on the environment, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be prepared in
accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15064(a). However, if the
lead agency determines the impacts are, or can be reduced to, less than significant, a Mitigated Negative
Declaration (MND) or Negative Declaration (ND) may be prepared instead of an EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section
15070\[b\]). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15070, a MND or ND is appropriate when the project’s Initial
Study identifies potentially significant effects, but:
a. Revisions to the project plan were made that would avoid or reduce the effects to a point where
clearly no significant effects would occur; and
b. There is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the
environment.
This IS prepared by the City of El Segundo (including an attached Environmental Checklist form) concludes
that the proposed project may have a significant environmental effect and the preparation of a
Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) is required. This IS was prepared in accordance with
Section 15070 of the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
B. LEAD AGENCY
The lead agency is the public agency with primary responsibility over a proposed project. In accordance
with CEQA Guidelines Section 15051(b)(1), “the lead agency will normally be the agency with general
governmental powers.” The project would be approved and carried out by the City of El Segundo.
Therefore, based on the criteria described above, the City of El Segundo is the lead agency for the
proposed project.
C.PURPOSE AND DOCUMENT OGRANIZATION
The City is preparing a PEIR for the proposed El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Project (Specific
Plan project). The purpose of this IS is to evaluate the potential environmental effects and the document
is divided into the following sections:
I. INTRODUCTION
This section provides an introduction and describes the purpose and organization of this
document.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
I-1
I. INTRODUCTION
II. INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
This section includes the project background and a detailed description of the project. This section
describes the environmental setting for each of the environmental subject areas; evaluates a
range of impacts classified as “no impact,” “less than significant impact,” “less than significant
impact with mitigation incorporated,” or “potentially significant impact” in response to the
environmental checklist and provides an environmental determination for the project.
III. REFERENCES
This section identifies resources used in the preparation of the IS.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
I-2
II. INTIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1. Project Title:
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update (Specific Plan Update)
2. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of El Segundo
Community Development Department
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
3. Lead Agency Contact Person and Phone Number:
Paul Samaras, AICP, Principal Planner, (310) 524-2340
4. Project Location:
El Segundo, California
County of Los Angeles
The El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update area (project area) is in Downtown El Segundo, in the
northwest quadrant of the City of El Segundo. The Specific Plan area is approximately 43.8 acres in
size. The project area is irregular in shape with portions extending to Eucalyptus Drive to the east, El
Segundo Boulevard to the south, Concord Street to the west, and Mariposa Avenue to the north.
The Downtown remains a small, distinct area within El Segundo and most of the Specific Plan area
includes a range of neighborhood serving commercial uses including retail, restaurants, offices, and
banks; and there are some existing civic uses and residential units. Existing development within the
Specific Plan area ranges from one- to three-story buildings, with many buildings located along or near
the front property line at one to two-story heights and a few three-story buildings. The Specific Plan
area is generally gently sloping with some steeper topography along portions Main Street and the
Marketplace Alley.
The Specific Plan area is divided by two principal streets running in a north-south orientation, Main
Street and Richmond Street, and contains portions of lesser traveled Standard Street and Concord
Street. Two major streets cross in an east-west orientation, Grand Avenue and El Segundo Boulevard,
as do sections of four smaller streets: Franklin Avenue, Holly Avenue, Pine Avenue, and Mariposa
Avenue. Main Street, Grand Avenue, and El Segundo Boulevard each connect to major, regional
arterials or freeways. Main Street runs between El Segundo Boulevard and Imperial Highway, which
borders Los Angeles International Airport. El Segundo Boulevard, on the southern boundary of the
Specific Plan area, connects to Pacific Coast Highway and the I-405 Freeway. Grand Avenue links to
Pacific Coast Highway to the east and the coastline to the west. The project area location is shown in
Figure 1, Regional Location and Figure 2, Specific Plan Update Project Boundary.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-1
QSPKFDU!TJUF
Qspkfdu!Bsfb
Tpvsdf;!PqfoTusffuNbqt!boe!Hpphmf!Nbqt-!Efdfncfs!3133/
Gjhvsf!2
Sfhjpobm!Mpdbujpo!Nbq
MARIPOSA AVE
PINE AVE
HOLLY AVE
GRAND AVE
FRANKLIN AVE
4136-027-010
EL SEGUNDO BLVD
LEGEND
Project Area Boundary
Single-Family ResidentialDowntown Commercial
Downtown
Two-Family ResidentialGeneral Commercial
Specific Plan
Multi-Family ResidentialPublic Facilities
Smoky Hollow
Heavy Industrial
Parks
Parking
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!3
Tqfdjgjd!Qmbo!Vqebuf!Qspkfdu!Cpvoebsz
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
5. Applicant’s Name and Address:
City of El Segundo
Community Development Department
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
6. General Plan Land Use Designation:
The El Segundo General Plan provides for a range of land use designations/zones in the City. The
Specific Plan Update proposes to expand the boundaries of the Downtown Specific Plan area to
include eight parcels located on Standard Street to the north and south of Grand Avenue. The eight
parcels would require amendments to the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan to change the
land use designation on the eight parcels from Downtown Commercial to Downtown Specific Plan.
The existing and proposed land uses are shown in Figures 3 and 4.
7. Zoning Designation:
The Specific Plan Update would also amend the City’s zoning map to change the zoning on eight
parcels from Downtown Commercial (C-RS) to Downtown Specific Plan (DSP). The existing and
proposed zoning are shown in Figures 5 and 6.
8. Description of Project:
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan, which serves as land use
and zoning for properties within the boundaries of the Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan Update
would revise the existing Specific Plan planning districts, amend General Plan and zoning designations
on eight parcels, and include mobility enhancements. The Specific Plan Update would include public
improvements and streetscape guidelines, private urban form criteria, permitted land uses,
development standards, mobility and infrastructure improvements, an implementation plan, and
administration processes.
Specific Plan Planning Districts
The City adopted the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan on August 1, 2000. The district
boundaries within the existing Specific Plan were analyzed and refined for this update based upon
existing community values, expected market demand, and shared characteristics, including the vision
of a range of allowable uses and development standards to support the desired future condition of
the districts. The district-based approach is by nature a “mixed-use” zoning approach, where the
desired activities and building forms dictate what is conditionally allowed and what is not allowed.
This hybrid approach to zoning combines form-based development standards with a selection of
compatible uses tailored for each Specific Plan district and allows for shaping of the built environment,
while providing flexibility in the types of allowable uses. The existing Downtown Specific Plan area is
divided into six districts (Main Street District, Main Street Transitional District, Richmond Street
District, North Richmond Street District, Grand Avenue District, and West Grand Avenue Transitional
District) and the proposed Specific Plan Update would instead consolidate the Specific Plan area into
four districts: Main Street, Richmond Street, Grand Avenue, and Civic Center districts. Figure 7,
Proposed Specific Plan Districts, shows the boundaries of the proposed four districts.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-4
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!4
Fyjtujoh!Mboe!Vtf!Eftjhobujpot
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!5
Qspqptfe!Mboe!Vtf!Eftjhobujpot
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!6
Fyjtujoh!\[pojoh
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!7
Qspqptfe!\[pojoh
NBSJQPTB!!!BWF
QJOF!!BWF
IPMMZ!!!BWF
GSBOLMJO!!BWF
FM!!TFHVOEP!!CMWE
Gjhvsf!8
Qspqptfe!Tqfdjgjd!Qmbo!Ejtusjdut
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Richmond Street District
This district would be similar in nature to the Main Street district, and it contains some of the oldest
commercial buildings in the city, including the Old Town Music Hall. The district would abut Multi-
Family Residential (R-3) uses to the west across the alley. It would be an eclectic mixed-use
environment of commercial and residential uses and includes the existing Specific Plan districts:
Richmond Street District, North Richmond Street District, Grand Avenue District, and West Grand
Avenue Transitional District.
The Richmond street District would:
Provide for a variety of uses including retail sales and service, restaurants and bars,
residential units, professional, medical and dental offices, schools, and banks.
Foster an eclectic mixed-use environment, allowing for more flexibility in the mixture of
commercial uses including professional office and stand-alone residential permitted on
the ground floor fronting Richmond Street.
Celebrate the traditional “Old Town” character and entertainment uses within the area
by encouraging entertainment options, outdoor dining, clubs, and restaurants and
supporting filming related uses, antique stores, arts and crafts, and design studios.
Enhance streetscapes with additional lighting, places to sit, and landscaping.
The proposed Richmond Street District would combine three of the existing districts (Richmond Street
District, North Richmond Street District, Grand Avenue District, and West Grand Avenue Transitional
District). This approach would create a common vision and more simplified zoning approach to this
smaller area. Development would continue to be located at the street edge and complement the
traditional building forms in the district. The DSP update contains a recommendation to improve
pedestrian connectivity on Richmond Street (between Grand Avenue and Franklin Avenue) which
would eliminate parking but accommodate opportunities for outdoor dining, expanded sidewalks and
community gathering. An alternative future option would be to allow permanent closure of this street
segment and create a multi-purpose plaza.
Currently, the Downtown Commercial designation allows billiard-pool rooms and bowling alleys;
daycare centers; financial institutions; general offices; governmental buildings; medical-dental
offices; restaurants; retail uses; and schools. The updated DSP would allow similar uses and reflect
terminology for contemporary uses.
The proposed DSP would eliminate the City’s 25-foot stepback requirements but keep the maximum
building height of 45 feet. In addition, minimum lot area, floor area ratio, and maximum residential
density regulations would be removed and translated to a form-based approach. Parking strategies
would continue to allow for use of an in-lieu fee program to satisfy onsite parking requirements and
parking would continue to be required to be accessed from the alley.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-11
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Grand Avenue District
The Grand Avenue District would serve as a gateway from the west entry of the City of El Segundo to
the Downtown core. This district would contain larger lots and contiguous parcels which provide the
highest redevelopment opportunity within the Specific Plan area. The District would be bounded by
multi-family residential uses (R-3) to the north with light industrial and office (SH-W) to the south
which provide a buffer to surrounding single-family residential uses. This district would contain and
include a few lots that are currently zoned C-RS and a portion of the previous 2000 Specific Plan’s
Main Street Transitional District.
The Grand Avenue District would:
Provide an opportunity to create a more pedestrian-oriented environment and a location to
accommodate an increased demand for office and residential uses within the city and with
the maximum building heights permitted within the Specific Plan area.
Develop a pedestrian-oriented destination with expanded sidewalks, planters, street trees
and furnishings required at street edge, buildings rather than parking located at the street
edge, and ground floor design criteria to establish additional window and door transparency
along Main Street and Grand Avenue.
Promote community amenities including common, publicly accessible, open space, public art,
and enhanced pedestrian access in and around an individual project site.
The proposed Grand Avenue District would allow additional residential and office uses at higher
densities and located on the ground floor. New development would be located at the street edge with
an enhanced pedestrian environment on Grand Avenue and Main Street. This will be accomplished
through building standards and by requiring parking to be onsite and located behind buildings.
Currently, the Downtown Commercial designation allows billiard-pool rooms and bowling alleys;
daycare centers; financial institutions; general offices; governmental buildings; medical-dental
offices; restaurants; retail uses; and schools. To address community needs and current market
demand, the updated DSP would allow similar uses with additional opportunities for office and
residential uses.
Allowed building heights along Main Street would be increased from a maximum of 45 feet to 60 feet.
In addition, minimum lot area, floor area ratio, and maximum residential density regulations would
be removed and translated to a form-based approach. Buildings would have pedestrian-oriented
ground floor designs with additional window and door transparency required along Main Street.
Publicly accessible open space, enhanced pedestrian access in and around a site, and expanded
sidewalks with planters, street trees and furnishings located at the street edge. Parking would be
required on-site or via in lieu fees with minimal access points along Grand Avenue and Main Street.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-12
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Civic Center District
Located centrally in the Specific Plan area, this district includes City Hall, the El Segundo Police
Department, the El Segundo Fire Department, and existing public plaza and open spaces. This district
was part of the previous 2000 Specific Plan’s Main Street District.
The Civic Center District will:
Allow for activities for all ages with enhanced and flexible multi-use outdoor gathering areas.
Enhance opportunities for outdoor entertainment and temporary events and infuse outdoor
retail uses such as newsstands, coffee carts, flower stands, vendors, and food trucks.
Expand existing uses to include governmental offices and public safety facilities, recreational
uses, outdoor entertainment and temporary events, outdoor retail uses, retail sales and
services, residential units, and a location for a future public parking structure.
The proposed Civic Center District would redesign gathering spaces for outdoor entertainment and
events, reduce lawn areas and add public uses and activities, and add a public parking structure to
serve Downtown patrons, City Hall employees and visitors. A phased approach to civic center
redevelopment is recommended.
The Civic Center District area would be removed from the current Main Street District to focus uses
around civic and community needs and activities. This area lends itself to buildings with the greatest
height in the DSP. Allowed building heights would be increased from 45 feet to 60 feet. In addition,
minimum lot area, floor area ratio, and maximum residential density regulations would be removed
and translated to a form-based approach. Should the City decide to redevelop City Hall in a compact
fashion, future opportunities for residential uses (not to exceed overall projected DSP capacity) and
limited complementary commercial uses may be considered. Parking would continue to be required
onsite with the additional opportunity for provision of public parking through the addition of a parking
structure.
General Plan and Zoning Designations
The Specific Plan Update proposes to expand the boundaries of the Downtown Specific Plan area to
include eight parcels located on Standard Street to the north and south of Grand Avenue. The eight
parcels would require amendments to the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan to change the
land use designation on eight parcels from Downtown Commercial to Downtown Specific Plan. The
Specific Plan Update would also amend the City’s zoning map to change the zoning on eight parcels
from Downtown Commercial (C-RS) to Downtown Specific Plan (DSP). The existing and proposed land
use and zoning are shown in Figures 3 through 6.
The Specific Plan Update is proposed to accommodate future market demand in the project area. The
potential demand within the project area (through 2040) is shown in Table 1, Proposed Land Use
Increase in Downtown El Segundo.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-13
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Table 1
Proposed Land Use Increase in Downtown El Segundo
UseProposed
Retail and Restaurant 130,000 square feet
Office 200,000 square feet
Medical Office24,000 square feet
Residential Units 300 units
Mobility Enhancements
In addition to land use and zoning changes, the Specific Plan Update would include mobility
enhancements including expanding pedestrian areas along portions of Main Street, Richmond Street,
and Grand Avenue, which would involve changes to the number of travel lanes on those streets. The
project would eliminate a portion of an existing truck route that is located on Main Street between El
Segundo Boulevard and Grand Avenue; include the potential closure of a portion of Richmond Street
to vehicles, generally from Franklin Avenue to Grand Avenue to create a permanent pedestrian only
street for outdoor dining and gathering; and include buffered bicycle lanes on Main Street and Grand
Avenue. The project would include pedestrian and transit improvements in the project area, including
widened sidewalks. Transit improvements could include bus stop enhancements and potentially new
and/or relocated bus stops. Widened sidewalks would also provide expanded outdoor seating and
dining areas for area restaurants.
Lastly, the Specific Plan Update would include modifications to parking standards and strategies and
alternatives for on-street parking and two new parking structures at the northwest corner of Grand
Avenue and Standard Street and the northeast corner of Richmond and Franklin.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
The existing land uses surrounding the Specific Plan area are generally residential in nature, ranging
from one- to three-stories in height in a fully developed urban environment.
North
The El Segundo High School campus, El Segundo Library, and Library Park are located just north of the
Specific Plan area on Main Street. The neighborhoods surrounding these civic uses are comprised
mainly of single-family dwellings, duplexes, and apartment complexes.
West
An area zoned Neighborhood Commercial is located just west of the Specific Plan area. Less than a
mile from the western edge of the Specific Plan is the Pacific Ocean coastline. Both Dockweiler Beach
and El Segundo Beach are primarily accessed via Grand Avenue, which runs east-west through the
city. The neighborhoods between Downtown El Segundo and the coast are comprised mainly of single-
family dwellings, duplexes, and apartment complexes.
South
South of El Segundo Boulevard is the Chevron Refinery, which is zoned Heavy Industrial (M-2) and
covers over 1,000 acres of land.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-14
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
East
The neighborhoods to the east of the Specific Plan area are comprised of a mix of single-family
dwellings, duplexes, and apartment complexes. The areas south and east of the Specific Plan area
contain the Sleepy Hollow Specific Plan which are developed with light industrial, and office uses. El
Segundo Recreation Park, located along Pine Avenue and Eucalyptus Drive, provides recreational
facilities for a range of sports, including softball, roller hockey, tennis, and basketball.
10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required:
No other approvals by outside public agencies are required.
11. Have California Native American Tribes Traditionally and Culturally Affiliated with the Project Area
Requested Consultation Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1:
The City of El Segundo typically initiates consultation with the Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe,
Gabrielino/Tongva Nation, Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council, Gabrielino/Tongva
San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation and their
designated tribal representatives. On January 12, 2023, the City sent letters to the above listed tribes
to elicit input in the Specific Plan Update and requested information regarding tribal cultural resources
within the City. Responses to the notification letters and results of any consultation will be discussed
in the PEIR.
B. ENVIRONMENTALFACTORSPOTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas EmissionsHazards & Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water QualityLand Use/Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population/Housing Public Services
RecreationTransportation/TrafficTribal Cultural Resources
Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of
Significance
C. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because of the incorporated mitigation measures and revisions in the
project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-15
II.INITIALSTUDYCHECKLIST
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and anENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless
mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based
on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,
but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant toapplicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon
the proposed project, nothing further is required.
SignatureDate
Paul SamarasPrincipal Planner
D.EVALUATIONOFENVIRONMENTALIMPACTS
1)A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources cited. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the
referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the
one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be
explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
2)All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project-level, indirect, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3)A “Less Than Significant Impact” applies when the proposed project would not result in a
substantial and adverse change in the environment. This impact level does not require mitigation
measures.
4)“Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there issubstantial evidence that an effect is
significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the
determination is made, an EIR is required.
5)“Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than
Significant Impact.” The initial study must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain
how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateCity of El Segundo
Initial StudyJanuary 2023
II-16
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
1. AESTHETICS. Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099 would the project:
a)Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including,
but not limited to, trees, rock outcrops, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views of
the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those
that are experienced from publicly accessible
vantage point.) If the project is in an urbanized area,
would the project conflict with applicable zoning
and other regulations governing scenic quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare
which would adversely affect day or nighttime views
in the area?
Environmental Setting
Scenic Vistas and Scenic Resources
The City’s General Plan does not define any designated scenic vistas or resources in the City, which include
the Specific Plan area. The General Plan includes an Open Space designation applied to areas that are
preserved as usable or visual open space both publicly- and privately-owned. The Open Space Element
states that open space provides visual relief from urban development and helps shape the urban form.
Visual Character
Existing development within the Specific Plan area ranges from one- to three-story buildings, with many
buildings located along or near the front property line at one to two-story heights and a few two- to three-
story buildings. The Specific Plan area is generally gently sloping with some steeper topography along
portions Main Street and the Marketplace Alley.
Light and Glare
The Specific Plan area is developed with established existing sources of light and glare, such as streetlights
and parking lights, walkway lights, lighted recreational facilities, and light emitted from residential and
nonresidential buildings. The Specific Plan area is surrounded by other urbanized development on all
sides. Many of the residential neighborhoods are surrounded or flanked with commercial and light
manufacturing uses, which may create greater lighting effects.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-17
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Regulatory Setting
Regulations exist at local levels that guide development and influence the physical form and aesthetic
character of the Specific Plan area and include:
El Segundo General Plan
El Segundo Municipal Code
Downtown Specific Plan
Checklist Discussion
a) No Impact.
The El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update (Specific Plan Update) in and of itself does not propose
or authorize any projects or development plan. In general, the purpose of the Specific Plan is to provide
the opportunity to implement the vision of the community for the Downtown, while enhancing the quality
small town environment for the residents.
Future development would be required to adhere to all city design guidelines and standards including the
Zoning Ordinance, General Plan policies, and the Downtown Specific Plan development guidelines for a
particular area. The Specific Plan Update proposes amendments to the Land Use Element of the City’s
General Plan to change the land use designation on eight parcels from Downtown Commercial to
Downtown Specific Plan. The Specific Plan Update would also amend the City’s zoning map to change the
zoning on eight parcels from Downtown Commercial (C-RS) to Downtown Specific Plan (DSP).
No projects are proposed in Open Space designated areas. All future projects would be developed on sites
that are designated as Downtown Specific Plan (DSP), which would allow residential, office, medical office,
retail and restaurant uses. No areas currently designated as open space would be converted to urban uses
and no development would be permitted to encroach on open space.
All future projects would be treated as individual projects and may be subject to specific environmental
analysis. Nevertheless, there are no policies in the Specific Plan Update which either permit or promote
development in areas that aren’t currently developed with existing uses. There are no policies or programs
in the Specific Plan Update that would directly affect scenic vistas nor any that would degrade the visual
character of the City. Therefore, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. No
further evaluation of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
b) No Impact.
There are no state scenic highways in the vicinity of El Segundo, including the Specific Plan area. Therefore,
no impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation of this topic is
required in the Programmatic EIR.
c) Potentially Significant Impact.
The Specific Plan area is built out with a range of neighborhood serving commercial uses including retail,
restaurants, offices, and banks; and there are some existing civic uses and residential units. The purpose
behind the Specific Plan Update is to create a mix of uses and entertainment options and cohesive
elements that tie the community and Downtown together, which could increase overall development
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-18
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
intensity compared to existing uses. The proposed DSP update would include development standards,
including building form, massing, and articulation standards that would increase building heights, reduce
or eliminate stepbacks, and allow additional residential and office use at higher densities. Parking would
be required on-site or in lieu and be accessed from alleys behind buildings.
Because implementation of the Specific Plan Update has the potential to change the overall scale and
mass of development within the community, project impacts related to regulations governing scenic
quality could potentially be significant. Therefore, this issue will be further analyzed within the
Programmatic EIR.
d) Potentially Significant Impact.
The Specific Plan area is built out with a range of neighborhood serving commercial uses including retail,
restaurants, offices, banks, and some existing civic uses and residential units. These uses include exterior
building safety and security lighting, parking lot lighting, adjacent street lighting, and glass and metal
building materials that produce glare. Therefore, the existing uses currently contribute to light and glare
sources within the Specific Plan area. Further, implementation of the Specific Plan update could increase
development intensity compared to existing uses and could introduce new potential sources of light and
glare that could adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area. Therefore, project impacts
related to light and glare could potentially be significant and will be further evaluated in detail in the
Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-19
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
2. AGRICULTURE ANDFORESTRY RESOURCES. Would the project:
a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
c)Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning
of, forestland (as defined in Public Resources Code
Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public
Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by Government
Code Section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forestland or conversion of
forestland to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result
in conversion of Farmland to nonagricultural use or
conversion of forestland to non-forest use?
Environmental Setting
The Specific Plan area is an urban environment designated for residential, commercial, and civic center
uses and is essentially built out. There is no land within the City of El Segundo, including the Specific Plan
area, designated or zoned for agricultural use, farmland, forest, or timber production nor are there any
existing agricultural, farmland, forest or timber production uses. Pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program, the City, including the Specific Plan area, is designated as Urban and Built Up Land
and Non-Agricultural or Natural Vegetation (California Department of Conservation 2018).
Checklist Discussion
a), b), c), d), e) No Impact.
The Specific Plan Update does not propose or authorize any development. The Specific Plan Update would
not convert any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non-
agricultural use. No land within the City of El Segundo, including the Specific Plan area, is subject to the
Williamson Act contract. As mentioned above, the City of El Segundo, including the Specific Plan area,
does not have any land that is designated or zoned for forest use or timber production. Additionally, there
are no nearby agricultural sites that would be affected by development within El Segundo, including the
Specific Plan area. Therefore, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. No
further evaluation of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-20
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Mitigation
Impact Impact
Incorporated
3. AIR QUALITY.Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b)Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
nonattainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of
people?
Environmental Setting
Both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB)
have established ambient air quality standards for common pollutants. Ambient air quality standards are
set to protect public health and are levels of pollutants which represent safe levels that avoid specific
adverse health effects. The ambient air quality standards cover what are called “criteria” pollutants
because the health and other effects of each pollutant are described in criteria documents. The major
criteria pollutants are ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter. Both federal and
state ambient air quality standards apply, as established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and state air quality agencies (CALEPA for California). California air quality standards are generally
more stringent than federal standards.
The City of El Segundo, which includes the Specific Plan area, is within the South Coast Air Basin (basin).
In Los Angeles County, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is the agency
responsible for protecting the public health and welfare through the administration of federal and state
air quality laws and policies. This regional agency regulates air quality through its permit authority over
most types of stationary emission sources and through its planning and review process.
Attainment Designations
Specific geographic areas that do not meet federal air quality standards (National Ambient Air Quality
Standards \[NAASQS\]) or state air quality standards (California Ambient Air Quality Standards \[CAAQS\]) for
a particular air quality pollutant are in “nonattainment” areas for the pollutant. The current federal and
state attainment status for the basin is provided in Table 2, Federal and State Air Quality Designations in
the South Coast Air Basin.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-21
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Table 2
South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status
123
PollutantStandardAveraging TimeDesignationAttainment Date
1979 1-Hour2/6/2023
NAAQS Nonattainment (Extreme)
4
(0.12 ppm)(not attained)
1-Hour
Ozone
1-Hour
CAAQS Nonattainment N/A
(0.09 ppm)
1997 8-Hour
NAAQS Nonattainment (Extreme) 6/15/2024
(0.08 ppm)
2008 8-Hour
NAAQS Nonattainment (Extreme)7/20/2032
(0.075 ppm)
8-Hour
5
Ozone
2015 8-Hour
NAAQS Nonattainment (Extreme) 8/3/2038
(0.070 ppm)
8-Hour
CAAQS Nonattainment Beyond 2032
(0.070 ppm)
NAAQS1-Hour (35 ppm)Attainment (Maintenance) 6/11/2007 (attained)
CO
CAAQS 8-Hour (9 ppm) Attainment 6/11/2007 (attained)
NAAQS1-Hour (0.1 ppm)Unclassifiable/Attainment N/A (attained)
Annual (0.053
NAAQS Attainment (Maintenance) 9/22/1998 (attained)
ppm)
6
NO
2
1-hour (0.18
CAAQS ppm) Annual Attainment -
(0.030 ppm)
Designations Pending
NAAQS 1-Hour (75 ppb) N/A (attained)
(expect Uncl./Attainment)
24-Hour (0.14
7
SO
2
ppm)
NAAQS Unclassifiable/Attainment 3/19/1979 (attained)
Annual (0.03
ppm)
1987 24-Hour
8
NAAQS Attainment (Maintenance)7/26/2013 (attained)
3
(150 µg/m)
PM10
24-Hour (50
3
CAAQS µg/m) Annual Nonattainment N/A
3
(20 µg/m)
2006 24-Hour
NAAQS Nonattainment (Serious) 12/31/2019
3
(35 µg/m)
1997 Annual
NAAQS Attainment 8/24/2016
3
(15.0 µg/m)
9
PM2.5
2021 Annual
NAAQS Nonattainment (Serious) 12/31/2025
3
(12.0 µg/m)
Annual
CAAQS Nonattainment N/A
3
(12.0 µg/m)
3-Months Rolling Nonattainment
Lead NAAQS 12/31/2015
310
(0.15 µg/m) (Partial)
Notes:
Source: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/naaqs-caaqs-feb2016.pdf
1
NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standards, CAAQS = California Ambient Air Quality Standards
2
U.S. EPA often only declares Nonattainment areas; everywhere else is listed as Unclassifiable/Attainment or
Unclassifiable.
3
A design value below the NAAQS for data through the full year or smog season prior to the attainment date is typically
required for attainment demonstration.
4
1-hour O3 standard (0.12 ppm) was revoked, effective June 15, 2005 ; however, the Basin has not attained this standard
based on 2008-2010 data and is still subject to anti-backsliding requirements.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-22
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Table 2
South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status
-*5
1997 8-hour O3 standard (0.08 ppm) was reduced (0.075 ppm), effective May 27, 2008; the revoked 1997 O3 standard is
still subject to anti-backsliding requirements.
6
New NO2 1-hour standard, effective August 2, 2010; attainment designations January 20, 2012; annual NO2 standard
retained.
7
The 1971 annual and 24-hour SO2 standards were revoked, effective August 23, 2010; however, these 1971 standards will
remain in effect until one year after U.S. EPA promulgates area designations for the 2010 SO2 1-hour standard. Area
designations are still pending, with Basin expected to be designated Unclassifiable /Attainment.
8
Annual PM10 standard was revoked, effective December 18, 2006; 24-hour PM10 NAAQS deadline was 12/31/2006;
SCAQMD request for attainment redesignation and PM10 maintenance plan was approved by U.S. EPA on June 26,
2013, effective July 26, 2013.
9
Attainment deadline for the 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS (designation effective December 14, 2009) is December 31,
2019 (end of the 10th calendaryear after effective date of designations for Serious nonattainment areas). Annual PM2.5
standard was revised on January 15, 2013, effective March 18, 2013, from 15 to 12 µg/m3. Designations effective April
15, 2015, so Serious area attainment deadline is December 31, 2025.
10
Partial Nonattainment designation – Los Angeles County portion of Basin only for near-source monitors. Expect
redesignation to attainment based on current monitoring data.
Air Quality Management Plan
Every three (3) years the SCAQMD prepares a new Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), updating the
previous plan and having a 20-year horizon. On December 2, 2022 CARB approved the 2022 AQMP. The
2022 AQMP is a regional blueprint for achieving the federal air quality standards and healthful air. The
2022 AQMP includes both stationary and mobile source strategies to ensure that rapidly approaching
attainment deadlines are met, that public health is protected to the maximum extent feasible, and that
the region is not faced with burdensome sanctions if the Plan is not approved or if the NAAQS are not met
on time.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a
proposed project and applicable General Plans and Regional Plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The
regional plan that applies to the proposed project includes the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan
(AQMP). The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended General Plan Elements (including
land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for
consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A
proposed project would be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not
obstruct other policies.
Sensitive Receptors
CARB and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) have identified the following
groups of individuals as the most likely to be affected by air pollution: the elderly over 65, children under
14, infants (including in utero in the third trimester of pregnancy), and persons with cardiovascular and
chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma, emphysema, and bronchitis. Some land uses are considered
more sensitive to air pollution than others due to the types of population groups or activities involved and
are referred to as sensitive receptors. Examples of these sensitive receptors are residences, schools,
hospitals, and daycare centers.
Regulatory Setting
Regulations exist at federal, state, and local levels with regard to air quality and include:
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-23
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Federal Clean Air Act
California Clean Air Act
State Implementation Plan
California Energy Code
Regional Air Quality Strategy
South Coast Air Quality Management District Rules and Regulations
Checklist Discussion
a) Potentially Significant Impact.
The Specific Plan Update involves amendments to the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan to
change the land use designation on eight parcels from Downtown Commercial to Downtown Specific Plan.
The Specific Plan Update would also amend the City’s zoning map to change the zoning on eight parcels
from Downtown Commercial (C-RS) to Downtown Specific Plan (DSP). The proposed DSP Update would
increase permissible housing density in certain areas (or now allow them where they were not previously
allowed). The Specific Plan Update therefore has the potential to increase residents, housing, and
employment opportunities within the Specific Plan area, which could result in indirect population growth
that could conflict with the applicable air quality management plan. Therefore, this issue could be a
potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
b), c) Potentially Significant Impact.
The Specific Plan Update would provide direction for streetscape beautification, outdoor gathering
spaces, improved mobility, and other enhancements that would establish a unique and inviting
environment in the Downtown area. The proposed DSP update would include development standards,
including building form, massing, and articulation standards that would increase building heights, reduce
or eliminate stepbacks, and allow additional residential and office use at higher densities. The proposed
DSP would allow for refined and simplified uses. Future construction activities could include demolition,
grading, site preparation, building construction, paving, and architectural coating phases. This would
result in emissions of criteria pollutants due to the use of heavy-duty construction equipment and fugitive
dust generated during ground disturbing activities.
Operation of future uses in the Specific Plan area would primarily result in criteria pollutant emissions
from vehicle trips of employees, residents, and visitors traveling to the area, as well as small quantities of
emissions from landscaping equipment, energy use, and cleaning products. As there is a potential for
emittance of criteria pollutants in excess of the applicable thresholds and exposure to sensitive receptors
to pollutants, these issues could be a potentially significant impact. Therefore, this issue will be further
analyzed within the Programmatic EIR.
d) Potentially Significant Impact.
Short-Term (Construction) Emissions/Odors
Future development construction activities could result in minor amounts of odor compounds associated
with diesel heavy equipment exhaust and architectural coatings. These compounds would be emitted in
various amounts at various locations during construction and potentially effect nearby sensitive receptors.
Therefore, impacts related to construction-generated odors would be potentially significant Therefore,
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-24
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
this issue will be further analyzed within the Programmatic EIR.
Long-Term (Operational) Emissions/Odors
The proposed DSP would potentially result in the operation of new land uses, including restaurants,
medical offices, etc. The Specific Plan Update would potentially create new land uses that, in the long-
term operation, have the potential to create odors. Therefore, impacts related to odors generated from
operations from the Specific Plan Update would be potentially significant. Therefore, this issue will be
further analyzed within the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-25
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
4. BIOLOGICALRESOURCES.Would the project:
a)Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies,
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands a (including, but not
limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through
direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or
other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species
or with established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat
conservation plan, natural community conservation
plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
Environmental Setting
The City of El Segundo, including the Specific Plan area, is a dense and urban community with very limited
vacant land. The City is bounded by urban development to the north, east, and south. The western
boundary of the City includes 0.8 miles of shoreline along the Santa Monica Bay. With the exception of
the shoreline area, the City is fully developed with urbanized uses.
The General Plan includes an Open Space designation applied to areas that are public parks or private land
reserved for open spaces. However, all these lands are either developed with park uses or utility
infrastructure and surrounded by urbanized areas.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-26
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Although there are areas within El Segundo that contain sensitive habitat for the coastal habitat for the El
Segundo Blue Butterfly, these areas are located in coastal areas and not within the Specific Plan area. As
described in the General Plan Conservation Element, the El Segundo Blue Butterfly is listed on the federal
endangered species list, and is dependent upon and rarely strays from coastal buckwheat plants. At this
time, the butterfly occurs on a 1.96 acre preserve adjacent to and maintained by the Chevron Refinery
and in the dune area under the flight path of the Los Angeles International Airport, neither of which are
located within the Specific Plan area.
The shoreline is classified as Estuarine and Marine Wetland on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s National
Wetlands Inventory. One area of the City is shown as Freshwater Emergent Wetland. This area is located
in the western area of the City on undeveloped land near the Hyperion Water Treatment Plant, located
approximately 1.5 miles northwest of the Specific Plan area. There are several areas south of Grand
Avenue and west of Vista Del Mar that are classified as Freshwater Ponds. This area is located
approximately 0.7 mile west of the Specific Plan area. Other than these areas, there are no sensitive
habitats, riparian habitats, or wetlands in the City, including the Specific Plan area.
The City has ordinances related to the removal of City street trees by private individuals but does not have
a tree preservation policy or ordinance.
Regulatory Setting
Regulations exist at federal, state, and local levels with regard to biological resources and include:
Federal Endangered Species Act
Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act
Federal Clean Water Act
California Endangered Species Act
California Fish and Game Code
Natural Community Conservation Planning Act
Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act
City of El Segundo General Plan
City of El Segundo Municipal Code (Title 9, Chapter 3)
Checklist Discussion
a) b) c) d) Less than Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan.
The Specific Plan area is located in urbanized area that have been developed previously. Inasmuch as the
Specific Plan Update could indirectly result in commercial and residential development and improvement,
the project could result in increased density in residential, commercial, and mixed-use areas of the City.
However, the City is largely built-out and the City’s General Plan Land Use Element and zoning code
focuses growth into urbanized portions of the City.
No development is proposed on or near the areas mapped as wetlands. Because the areas where potential
development may occur have already been disturbed through urban development, no significant changes
are anticipated in the diversity or number of species of plants or animals, or in the deterioration of existing
wildlife habitat. No riparian habitat, wetlands, wildlife corridors or nurseries would be impacted.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-27
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Existing applicable federal, state, and/or local policies would prevent development in areas that support
sensitive or special status species, federally protected wetlands, or migration corridors.
Accordingly, adoption of the Specific Plan Update would have a less than significant impact on biological
resources, including candidate, sensitive, or special-status species; riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community; federally protected wetlands a (including, but not limited to marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.); or native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, corridors, or nurseries. No mitigation
measures are required. No further evaluation of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
e) No Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. The City does not have a tree
preservation ordinance for trees on private property. In the event future development requires the
removal of trees on City property, as part of the approval process the developer would be required to
comply with City policies related to tree removal and replacement. Therefore, no impacts would occur,
and no mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation of this topic is required in the
Programmatic EIR.
f) No Impact.
The City does not have a Habitat Conservation Plan nor Natural Community Conservation Plan. The
Specific Plan area is located within a fully developed, urban setting surrounded by office, commercial, and
residential land uses void of native plant or animal life and limited cover and foraging habitat and the
Specific Plan Update would not significantly impact biological resources. There are no Habitat
Conservation Plans or Natural Community Conservation Plans applicable to these areas. Therefore, no
impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation of this topic is
required in the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-28
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Mitigation
Impact Impact
Incorporated
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
Section 15064.5?
b)Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant
to Section 15064.5?
c) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Environmental Setting
The City, which includes the Specific Plan area, was incorporated in 1917. The City has very distinct and
identifiable areas. The City has a very strong residential base, which is a mixture of single-family, two-
family, and multi-family residential structures. The Downtown area includes the Civic Center. Near the
Downtown is Smoky Hollow, an older industrial area that contains mostly older industrial buildings of one
or two stories.
Areas south of El Segundo Boulevard and west of Pacific Coast Highway are mostly occupied by the
Chevron Refinery, which occupies approximately one-third of the City. The Refinery also occupies a
portion of the coastal zone, along with a Southern California Edison Generating Station. The beach area is
publicly owned and accessible.
Areas of the City east of Pacific Coast Highway consist of a combination of industrial, office, and
commercial uses. This area contains the large areas of development consisting of a mixture of office and
research and development uses, as well as the U.S. Air Force Base.
Regulatory Setting
Regulations exist at federal, state, and local levels with regard to cultural resources and include:
National Historic Preservation
National Register of Historic Places
Federal Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
California Register of Historic Resources
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5
California Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
California Public Resources Code Section 5097
Assembly Bill 52
Senate Bill 18
El Segundo General Plan Conservation Element
El Segundo Municipal Code
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-29
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Checklist Discussion
a) Potentially Significant Impact.
The Specific Plan Update itself does not propose or authorize any specific development and would not
result in physical alterations or improvements. However, future development in the Specific Plan Update
area would occur in urban areas that are currently developed and could potentially affect historic and
cultural resources. Buildings that are not considered historic resources at this time, would need to be
evaluated to determine if any are historic resources. Therefore, this issue could be a potentially significant
impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
b) Potentially Significant Impact.
It is unknown if there are any archaeological resources in the Specific Plan area, which is comprised of
previously developed and disturbed areas. Because future project excavations would extend into
undisturbed, native soils, there is the potential for project construction to impact previously undiscovered
archaeological resources. In the unlikely event that future development does disturb archaeological
resources, within the Specific Plan area, compliance with state regulations pertaining to discovery of
archaeological resources would ensure that impacts are avoided. Regardless, this issue could be a
potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
c) Potentially Significant Impact.
It is unlikely that human remains would have been discovered and left in situ or re-interred within the
Specific Plan area. Within the project sites that are fully developed, and it is unlikely that human remains
exist on-site. However, because any future project excavations would extend into undisturbed, native soils,
there is the potential for project construction to impact previously undiscovered human remains. In the
unlikely event that future development does disturb human remains, compliance with state regulations
pertaining to discovery of human remains, including California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, which
states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of the
origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, would ensue. Regardless, this
issue could be a potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic
EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-30
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Mitigation
Impact Impact
Incorporated
6. ENERGY. Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Environmental Setting
Electricity
Electricity is provided to the City, which includes the Specific Plan area, by Southern California Edison
(SCE). SCE provides electric power to more than 15 million persons, within a service area encompassing
approximately 50,000 square miles. SCE derives electricity from varied energy resources including: fossil
fuels, hydroelectric generators, nuclear power plants, geothermal power plants, solar power generation,
and wind farms. SCE also purchases from independent power producers and utilities, including out-of-
state suppliers.
Natural Gas
Natural gas is provided to the City, which includes the Specific Plan area, by Southern California Gas
(SoCalGas).
Regulatory Setting
Regulations exist at federal, state, and regional levels with regard to energy and include:
Federal Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards
Federal Energy Independence and Security Act
California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6)
California Green Building Standards (Title 24, Part 11)
California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard
Senate Bill 350
Senate Bill 100
Assembly Bill 32 (California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006) and Senate Bill 32
Assembly Bill 1493 (Pavley I)
Executive Order S-1-07 (California Low Carbon Fuel Standard)
California Air Resources Board:
Advanced Clean Car Regulation
Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling
Regulation to Reduce Emissions of Diesel Particulate Matter, Oxides of Nitrogen, and other
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-31
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Criteria Pollutants from In-Use Heavy-Duty Diesel-Fueled Vehicles
Sustainable Communities Strategy (SB 375)
Assembly Bill 758
Senate Bill 1389
City of El Segundo Climate Action Plan
Checklist Discussion
a), b) Potentially Significant Impact.
The Specific Plan Update has the potential to incent development projects that would increase residents,
housing, and employment opportunities within the Specific Plan area, which could result in potential
impacts to due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project
construction or operation. Therefore, this issue could be a potentially significant impact and will be
further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-32
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
7. GEOLOGYAND SOILS. Would the project:
a)Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault?
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction, or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available for
the disposal of wastewater?
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
Environmental Setting
Faulting and Seismicity
There are no major fault zones locatedwithin the City of El Segundo. However, there are several faults
within the region that could have an impact on the City, which includes the Specific Plan area. Active faults
that could affect the City include the Newport-Inglewood, Charnock, Santa Monica, Sierra Madre, and
Palos Verdes Fault Zones. Other faults that could affect the City include the Verdugo, San Fernando, and
San Andreas Faults. The San Andreas Fault is approximately 55miles northeast of the City and is considered
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-33
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
the most seismically active fault in the southern California region. These faults are all close enough or
expected to generate strong enough shaking that could affect the City. However, the level of seismicity in
El Segundo, both as to maximum credible earthquake intensity and likely earthquake occurrences, is the
same as for the rest of the Los Angeles Basin.
The City is not at significant hazard from surface rupture as the nearest fault is the Newport-Inglewood,
which is 5 miles from the City.
Terrain and Soil Conditions
With the exception of a very small area adjacent to the Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant, theCity,
including the Specific Plan area, is relatively flat; therefore, the risk of landsliding is low. Some areas of
the City are located on sand dune formations with high groundwater tables. These soils are considered
1
susceptible to liquefaction and are located 0.80 miles west of the Specific Plan area.
Paleontological Resources
Based on prior paleontological investigations performed for the Crenshaw Transit Corridor Project and
LAX Master Plan Final EIS/EIR, sensitive paleontological resources were identified in the vicinity of the
City. Therefore, there is some potential and sensitivity for paleontological resources.to occur in the
Specific Plan area.
Regulatory Setting
Regulations exist at state and local levels with regard to geology and soils and include:
California Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act
California Seismic Hazards Mapping Act
California Building Code
El Segundo Building Code
El Segundo General Plan Public Safety Element
Checklist Discussion
a.i-ii) Less Than Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan.
Indirect impacts could occur through potential future development. Objectives of the Specific Plan Update
would encourage and facilitate the redevelopment of underutilized sites within the Downtown area,
including along primary transit corridors, but it does not propose specific development projects. As all
areas of the City are essentially built-out, all future development would be infill and/or replacement of
existing uses.
As southern California is seismically active, potential impacts associated with seismic hazards, including
1
California Department of Conservation, Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Map:
. Accessed December 2022.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-34
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
rupture of a fault, strong seismic shaking and seismic-related ground failure currently exist. Earthquakes
that could affect the City, including the Specific Plan area, would most likely originate from the Newport-
Inglewood, Charnock, Santa Monica, Sierra Madre, Palos Verdes, Verdugo, San Fernando, and San
Andreas Faults. These faults are close enough in proximity or expected to generate strong enough shaking
that could affect the City. As future development would only occur on sites currently or previously
developed, impacts resulting from potential construction would be the same as under current conditions.
The General Plan addresses geology and soils in the Safety Element, and the City has adopted the
California Building Code that includes provisions for construction in seismically active areas, and on
different types of soils. The level of seismicity in El Segundo, both as to maximum credible earthquake
intensity and likely earthquake occurrences, is approximately the same as for the Los Angeles Basin.
Adherence to regulatory codes, such as Uniform Building Code (UBC) and California Building Code (CBC),
would ensure that all new development would be built to adequately withstand strong seismic ground
shaking through proper engineering and design. Depending on location and scope, applicants may be
required to prepare geologic reports to address potential geologic impacts associated with the
development of the site. The City ensures compliance with development requirements at the time of
building permits are issued.
Neither adoption of the Specific Plan Update nor any future development within the urban/developed
core would result in potential impacts associated with seismic hazards that don’t currently exist.
Therefore, impacts related to geology and soil, such as faulting, groundshaking, and soil instability would
be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation of this topic is
required in the Programmatic EIR.
a.iii) Less than Significant Impact.
Strong seismic ground shaking could result in liquefaction of poorly consolidated and saturated soils.
Liquefaction occurs when water-saturated sediments are subjected to extended periods of shaking. The
Safety Element of the El Segundo General Plan states that some areas of the City are located on sand dune
formations with high groundwater tables. As previously discussed, these soils are located 0.80 miles west
2
of the Specific Plan area. Regardless, adherence to regulatory codes, such as UBC and CBC, would ensure
new structures be built to adequately withstand liquefaction or ground failure associated with strong
seismic ground shaking through proper engineering and design. This would limit the potential impact to
less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation of this topic is
required in the Programmatic EIR.
a.iv) No Impact.
The Specific Plan area is relatively flat, therefore, all future potential development sites are all located in
areas that are predominately flat. Therefore, the potential for seismically-induced landslides to occur is
low. Though landslides in the urban area are unlikely, future development in the City would be required
to adhere to all applicable UBC and CBC standards. Therefore, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation
measures are required. No further evaluation of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
2
California Department of Conservation, Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Map:
. Accessed December 2022.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-35
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
b) Less than Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. Soil erosion or loss of topsoil
would generally not occur as the Specific Plan area is primarily built out. No changes to policies resulting
in increased erosion would occur. Continued adherence to the standards of the existing CBC and
compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) requirements, as well as implementation of best management
practices, would limit impacts related to soil erosion. Additionally, all future development would be
required to implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) for construction activities as specified by the
California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook and/or the City’s Storm Water BMP
Manual. The BMPs include measures guiding the management and operation of construction sites to
control and minimize the volume of surface runoff. These measures address procedures for controlling
erosion and sedimentation and managing all aspects of the construction process. All future development
projects must comply with all City, state, and federal standards pertaining to stormwater run-off and
erosion. As such, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. No
further evaluation of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
c), d) Less than Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. New developments would be
located on sites that have already been developed. It is unlikely that a new structure on a previously or
currently occupied site designated for urban use would experience unstable conditions that were not
previously encountered. Future risks would be similar those that currently exist. Additionally, proper
engineering and adherence to required building standards, such as the UBC and CBC should ensure that
impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation of
this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
e) No Impact.
The Specific Plan area is entirely located within the urbanized area of the City. The City, which includes the
Specific Plan area, is served by existing sewer infrastructure. No septic tanks would be required. Therefore,
no impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation of this topic is
required in the Programmatic EIR.
f) Potentially Significant Impact.
Paleontological resources are the fossilized remains of organisms that have lived in a region in the geologic
past and whose remains are found in the accompanying geologic strata. This type of fossil record represents
the primary source of information on ancient life forms, since the majority of species that have existed on
earth from this era are extinct. Although future development would be constructed on infill sites or other
sites that are currently occupied with structures and have previously been graded, these structures may
require excavation deeper than was previously conducted. Therefore, future development resulting from
the Specific Plan has the potential to directly or indirectly destroy paleontological resources. Impacts would
be potentially significant, and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
With regard to a unique geologic feature, the Specific Plan area is currently developed with commercial,
residential, and surface parking uses and there are no unique geologic features in the Specific Plan area.
Therefore, the project would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique geologic feature. No impacts
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-36
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation of this topic is required in
the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-37
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Mitigation
Impact Impact
Incorporated
8. GREENHOUSEGAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions
of greenhouse gases?
Environmental Setting
Global temperatures are moderated by naturally occurring atmospheric gases. These gases are commonly
referred to as greenhouse gases (GHGs) because they function like a greenhouse, allowing solar radiation
(sunlight) into the Earth’s atmosphere but prevent heat from escaping, thus warming the Earth’s
atmosphere. GHGs, as defined under California’s Assembly Bill (AB) 32, include carbon dioxide (CO2),
methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur
hexafluoride (SF6). GHGs are emitted by natural processes and human (anthropogenic) activities.
Anthropogenic GHG emissions are primarily associated with (1) the burning of fossil fuels during
motorized transport, electricity generation, natural gas consumption, industrial activity, manufacturing,
and other activities; (2) deforestation; (3) agricultural activity; and (4) solid waste decomposition. GHG
emissions from human activities are the most significant driver of observed climate change since the mid-
3
20th century. Global climate change refers to changes in average climatic conditions over the entire
Earth, including temperature, wind patterns, precipitation, and storms.
Regulatory Setting
Regulations exist at federal, state, regional, and local levels with regard to GHGs and include:
Federal Clean Air Act
Light Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Corporate Average Fuel
Economy Standards
California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6
California Green Building Standards Code
Executive Order S-3-05
Assembly Bill 32 – Global Warming Solution Act of 2006
Senate Bill 375
Senate Bill 743
Senate Bill 97
3
United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis,
Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
2013.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-38
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Executive Order B-30-15
Senate Bill 32 and Assembly Bill 197
Assembly Bill 1493 – Vehicular Emissions of Greenhouse Gases
Assembly Bill 341
Executive Order S-01-07
Senate Bill 350
Senate Bill 100
California Air Resources Board: Scoping Plan
Checklist Discussion
a) Potentially Significant Impact.
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions refer to a group of emissions that are believed to affect global climate
conditions. These gases trap heat in the atmosphere and the major concern is that increases in GHG
emissions are causing global climate change. Global climate change is a change in the average weather on
the earth that can be measured by wind patterns, storms, precipitation, and temperature. Construction and
operation of future projects in the Specific Plan area would generate GHG emissions from the use of
construction equipment, construction workers’ vehicles, operational energy use, and operational project
trips to and from project sites, which may significantly impact the environment either directly or indirectly.
Therefore, GHG impacts could be a potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in
the Programmatic EIR.
b) Potentially Than Significant Impact.
Construction and operation of future projects in the Specific Plan area would generate GHG emissions,
which may conflict with the policies and goals of GHG-reduction plans, including, but not limited to, the
SCAG RTP/SCS, Assembly Bill (AB) 32 Scoping Plan, and Executive Orders S-03-05 and B-30-15. Therefore,
impacts with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions
of greenhouse gases could be a potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the
Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-39
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
9. HAZARDS ANDHAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
a)Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonable foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c)Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
2 miles or a public airport or public use airport,
d or
would the project result in a safety hazar
excessive noise for people residing or working in the
project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death
involving wildland fires?
Environmental Setting
Hazardous Materials
Hazardous materials encompass a wide range of substances, some of which are naturally occurring and
some of which are manufactured. Examples of hazardous materials include pesticides, herbicides,
petroleum products, metals (e.g., lead, mercury, arsenic), asbestos, and chemical compounds used in
manufacturing. Hazardous materials are used for a variety of purposes, including service industries,
various small businesses, medical uses, schools, and households. Many chemicals used in household
cleaning, construction, dry cleaning, film processing, landscaping, and automotive maintenance and repair
are considered hazardous. Small-quantity hazardous waste generators include facilities such as
automotive repair, dry cleaners, and medical offices. Hazardous materials could pose a substantial present
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-40
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
or future hazard to human health or the environment when improperly handled, disposed, or otherwise
managed.
Other Hazards
According to CAL FIRE, the City of El Segundo is not located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.
Regulatory Setting
Regulations exist at federal, state, and local levels with regard to hazards and hazardous materialsand
include:
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
Resources Conservation and Recovery Act
Hazardous Materials Transportation Act
Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77
California Code of Regulations
Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and inventory Act
Emergency Response to Hazardous Materials Incidents
California Government Code Section 65962.5
Emergency Response to Hazardous Materials Incidents
Los Angeles County 2019 All-Hazards Mitigation Plan
City of El Segundo Fire Department CUPA Area Plan for Emergency Response to Hazardous
Materials Incidents
City of El Segundo General Plan
City of El Segundo Municipal Code
Checklist Discussion
a) Less Than Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. Potential future projects
would be comprised of residential, office, medical office, retail and restaurant uses on sites that are
currently developed. The proposed DSP Update would potentially increase the density of these types of
uses; however, the occasional use or disposal of hazardous materials generally associated with these types
of uses include unused paint, aerosol cans, cleaning agents (solvents), landscaping-related chemicals, and
other common cleaning products and household substances. These materials are generally disposed of at
non-hazardous Class II and III landfills (along with municipal solid waste). With compliance with the
required procedures and guidelines during construction and throughout operation, impacts to the public
and the environment associated with future development due to the routine transport, use, and disposal
of hazardous materials would be less than significant. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant
and no mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation of this topic is required in the
Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-41
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
b) Potentially Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. Construction of future projects
in the Specific Plan area could involve the use of potentially hazardous materials such as vehicle fuels and
fluids that could be released should an accidental leak or spill occur. In addition, the soils in the Specific Plan
area may contain contamination. Construction activities involving disturbance of contaminated soils could
potentially create a significant hazard for construction workers and adjacent properties through upset or
accident conditions. Therefore, this issue could be a potentially significant impact and will be further
evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
Though construction activities have the potential to result in upset or accidental releases of hazardous
materials, operation of future uses in the Specific Plan area, which would be comprised of residential, office,
medical office, retail and restaurant uses, would not involve the use or storage of significant quantities of
hazardous materials. As discussed under Response (a), operational use of hazardous materials would be
limited to small quantities of cleaning solvents, paints, and landscaping maintenance materials. Although it
is anticipated operation of these uses would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through any reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials this potential impact will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
c) Potentially Significant Impact.
El Segundo High School is located approximately 0.08 mile north of the Specific Plan area. Future
development must comply with the applicable federal, State, and local Fire Department requirements
regard the handling of hazardous materials. Future construction would involve the temporary use of
potentially hazardous materials such as vehicle fuels and fluids that could be released should an accidental
leak or spill occur. However, standard construction BMPs for the use and handling of such materials would
avoid or reduce the potential for such conditions to occur. Any use of potentially hazardous materials
during construction of future projects would comply with all local, state, and federal regulations regarding
the handling of potentially hazardous materials, including Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations and
Title 22, Division 4.5 of the California Code of Regulations. However, as discussed above under Item b.,
project construction has the potential for accidental release of hazardous substances associated with on-
site soil contamination. Thus, construction activities associated with future uses have the potential to emit
hazardous emissions or handle hazardous substances within 0.25 mile of a school. Therefore, this issue
could be a potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
d) Potentially Significant Impact.
Downtown El Segundo is located near the north entrance to the Chevron Refinery. There is the potential
that future project sites are contained within a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 due to the location of the Chevron Refinery. Therefore, this issue could
be a potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
e) Potentially Significant Impact.
A small portion of the Specific Plan area is located within of the airport influence area established by the
Los Angeles County Airport Land Use Commission. Therefore, portions of the Specific Plan area are within
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-42
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
4
the area subject to the LAX Comprehensive Land Use Plan. This issue could be a potentially significant
impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
f) Potentially Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. Future projects in the Specific
Plan area would not interfere with the City’s adopted Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) because projects
would be reviewed to ensure that new development would not create barriers to evacuation plans.
The Specific Plan Update would not involve the development of structures that could potentially impair
implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan. Construction activities have the potential to temporarily impact traffic and vehicle
speeds on adjacent roadways; however, these impacts would be temporary and emergency access to
these roadways would not be blocked by future project construction. Furthermore, applicants would
coordinate with the City to ensure appropriate construction staging areas and adequate vehicular and
pedestrian access are temporarily provided on adjacent roadway. Any future project would be required
to comply with all applicable City codes and regulations pertaining to emergency response and evacuation
plans maintained by the police and fire departments, as well as fire protection and security on the sites.
However, the Specific Plan Update would include mobility enhancements including expanding pedestrian
areas along portions of Main Street, Richmond Street, and Grand Avenue, which would create potential
changes to the number of travel lanes on those streets. The project would eliminate a portion of an
existing truck route that is located on Main Street between El Segundo Boulevard and Grand Avenue;
proposes the potential closure of a portion of Richmond Street to vehicles, generally from Franklin Avenue
to Grand Avenue to create a permanent pedestrian only street for outdoor dining and gathering; and
include buffered bicycle lanes on Main Street and Grand Avenue. The project would include pedestrian
and transit improvements in the project area. including widened sidewalks. Transit improvements could
include bus stop enhancements and potentially new and/or relocated bus stops. Widened sidewalks
would also provide expanded outdoor seating and dining areas for area restaurants. As a result, the
Specific Plan Update has the potential to conflict with applicable emergency response and evacuation
plan. Therefore, this issue could be a potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail
in the Programmatic EIR.
g) No Impact.
According to CALFire, the City, which includes the Specific Plan area, is not located in a Very High Fire
5
Hazard Severity Zone. Future development within the Specific Plan area would not be subject to any
more risk than other development in the City not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.
Therefore, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation of
this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
4
County of Los Angeles, Airport Influence Area Map: https://geohub.lacity.org/datasets/lacounty::airport-
influence-area-1/explore?location=33.948437%2C-118.398020%2C13.00. Accessed December 2022.
5
Cal Fire, State Responsibility Area Viewer, website: https://calfire-
forestry.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=468717e399fa4238ad86861638765ce1.
Accessed: December 2022.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-43
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
10. HYDROLOGYAND WATER QUALITY.Would the project:
a)Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise substantially
degrade surface or groundwater quality?
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that the project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?
c)Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river or through the
addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which
would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-
site?
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or off-site?
iii) create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater
management plan?
Environmental Setting
Groundwater
The City, which includes the Specific Plan area, is located within the West Coast Groundwater Basin. Since
1962, the West Coast Basin has been an adjudicated groundwater basin, and the amount of groundwater
extracted is limited by court judgment. The City no longer withdraws from this groundwater source as it
receives its water from the West Basin Municipal Water District. West Basin purchases imported water
from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and wholesales the imported water to cities
and private companies in southwest Los Angeles County, including the City of El Segundo.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-44
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Surface Water
The City is bounded to the west by the Pacific Ocean. No surface waters of resource exist in the City,
including the Specific Plan area.
Flooding
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is mandated by the National Flood InsuranceAct of
1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 to evaluate flood hazards and provide Flood Insurance
Rate Maps (FIRMs) for local and regional planners to promote sound land use and floodplain
development. Further, the Flood Disaster Protection Act requires owners of all structures in identified
Special Flood Hazard Areas to purchase and maintain flood insurance as a condition of receiving Federal
or federally related financial assistance, such as mortgage loans from federally insured lending
institutions. The National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 further strengthened the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) by providing a grant program for State and community flood mitigation projects.
The act also established a system (Community Rating System - CRS) for crediting communities that
implement measures to protect the natural and beneficial functions of their floodplains, as well as
managing the erosion hazard.
The only area of the City located in a flood zone is the 0.8-mile frontage along the Pacific Ocean, which is
considered a Special Flood Hazard Area. The Specific Plan area is located approximately 1.0 mile east of
the Pacific Ocean.
Regulatory Setting
Regulations exist at federal, state, regional, and local levels with regard to hydrology and water quality
and include:
Clean Water Act/National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Requirements
National Flood Insurance Program
NPDES Construction General Permit
NPDES Groundwater Permit
NPDES Municipal Permit
Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin
Los Angeles County 2019 All-Hazards Mitigation Plan
City of El Segundo General Plan
City of El Segundo Municipal Code
Checklist Discussion
a) Less than Significant Impact.
Construction would require earthwork activities including excavation of on-site soils and site grading.
During earthwork activities, exposed and stockpiled soils on the construction site could be subject to
minor erosion and conveyed via stormwater runoff to municipal storm drains and into the Pacific Ocean.
However, any project construction would occur in accordance with the requirements of the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Permit (Order No. 99-08)-DWQ)
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-45
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
and the El Segundo Municipal Code Chapter 5-4. The El Segundo Municipal Code Chapter 5-4 specifies
Best Management Practices (BMPs) that must be used during construction to prevent or reduce pollutant
loading from stormwater or non-stormwater discharges to receiving waters. BMPs also include treatment
requirements, operating procedures, and practices to control plant site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or
waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage.
With compliance with regulatory requirements, pollutant levels in urban runoff during construction would
be minimized. Therefore, project construction impacts related to the violation of water quality standards
or waste discharge requirements would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required.
No further evaluation of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
b) Less than Significant Impact.
The City, which includes the Specific Plan area, is located within the West Coast Groundwater Basin. The
project could result in construction earthwork and groundwater may encountered during excavation in
the DSP area. It is also possible that dewatering systems would be necessary for projects resulting from
the DSP Update. The DSP area is primarily developed with existing urban uses and future development in
the DSP area would be infill development and would not likely result in large excavation areas or large
amounts of dewatering. Additionally, future development would not change large areas that are currently
undeveloped and available for rainwater infiltration. Therefore, construction and operation of any
potential development would have a minimal impact on groundwater in the area and would not
substantially decrease groundwater supplies through substantial increases in impervious surfaces.
The proposed project would generate a water demand. The City no longer withdraws from the West Coast
Groundwater Basin as a groundwater source as it receives its water from the West Basin Municipal Water
District. West Basin purchases imported water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California and wholesales the imported water to cities and private companies in southwest Los Angeles
County, including the City of El Segundo. Therefore, the project would not have the potential in decrease
groundwater supplies from increase in demand. Therefore, project impacts related to groundwater
supplies and recharge would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. No further
evaluation of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
c) i), ii), iii), iv) Less than Significant Impact.
There are no streams or rivers in the DSP area. The project could result in construction earthwork and
grading that would expose soils. However, any project construction would occur in accordance with the
requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction
Permit (Order No. 99-08)-DWQ) and the El Segundo Municipal Code Chapter 5-4. The El Segundo
Municipal Code Chapter 5-4 specifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) that must be used during
construction to prevent or reduce pollutant loading from stormwater or non-stormwater discharges to
receiving waters. BMPs also include treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practices to
control plant site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage.
During operation, development in the DSP area would be required to control pollutants, pollutant loads,
and runoff volume by: 1) minimizing the impervious surface area and 2) controlling runoff through
infiltration, bioretention, and/or rainfall harvest and use. Compliance with existing regulations such as the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System and the El Segundo Municipal Code Chapter 5-4, future
development in the Specific Plan area would not significantly impact water quality, drainage patterns and
runoff, or groundwater quality. The only area of the City located in a flood zone is the 0.8-mile frontage
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-46
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
along the Pacific Ocean, which is considered a Special Flood Hazard Area. The Specific Plan area is located
approximately 1.0 mile east of the Pacific Ocean.
Therefore, project impacts related to erosion, siltation, increase in run-off, or impeding or redirecting
flood flows would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation
of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
d) Less than Significant Impact.
The City, which includes the Specific Plan area, is located adjacent to the Pacific Ocean, which could create
tsunami. The Specific Plan area is located approximately 1.0 mile east of the Pacific Ocean. The tsunami
hazard area does not extend into any part of the City that is developed. Development resulting from the
Specific Plan Update would occur on previously developed sites in the City.
The City, which includes the Specific Plan area, does not contain large bodies of water that would be
subject to seiche. Accordingly, impacts related to the risk from tsunami or seiche would be less than
significant and no mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation of this topic is required in the
Programmatic EIR.
e) Less than Significant Impact.
As discussed above, the City would require implementation of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Permit (Order No. 99-08)-DWQ) and the El Segundo
Municipal Code Chapter 5-4 for any project activities. Therefore, project construction and operation
would not conflict with implementation of any water quality control plan. As discussed under b),
construction and operation of the project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere with groundwater recharge and would therefore not conflict with implementation of any
groundwater management plan. Therefore, project impacts would be less than significant and no
mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-47
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
11.LANDUSEANDPLANNING.Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a
conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
Environmental Setting
The City of El Segundo has a total land area of 5.4 square miles. The City of El Segundo is located in the
southern portion of Los Angeles County, approximately 20 miles southwest of downtown Los Angeles.
The City is bordered on the north by the Los Angeles International Airport; on the west by the Pacific
Ocean; to the south by the City of Manhattan Beach; and to the east by the 405 Freeway. These barriers
isolate El Segundo’s residential and downtown communities from other South Bay communities.
The Specific Plan area is in Downtown El Segundo, in the northwest quadrant of the City of El Segundo.
The Specific Plan area is approximately 43.8 acres in size and is irregular in shape with portions extending
to Eucalyptus Drive to the east, El Segundo Boulevard to the south, Concord Street to the west, and
Mariposa Avenue to the north. The Specific Plan area is currently developed with a wide range of
commercial, residential, and public uses.
Regulatory Setting
Regulations exist at state and local levels with regard to land use and include:
California Planning and Zoning Law, Government Code Sections 65000 et seq.
Southern California Association of Governments Connect SoCal Plan
City of El Segundo General Plan
City of El Segundo Municipal Code
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan
Checklist Discussion
a) No Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. Objectives of the Specific Plan
Update would encourage and facilitate the redevelopment of underutilized sites within the Downtown
area, including along primary transit corridors. Future development would be primarily infill both through
redevelopment of an existing site or the development of higher density mixed use projects. As such,
adoption of the Specific Plan Update would not physically divide an established community. Therefore,
no impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. No further evaluation of this topic is
required in the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-48
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
b) Potentially Significant Impact.
The Specific Plan Update is subject to numerous regional and local land use plans, policies, and regulations
as well as to the City of El Segundo Municipal Code, and requests several discretionary approvals including
a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Therefore, this issue could be a potentially significant
impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-49
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
12. MINERALRESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be a value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
Environmental Setting
Petroleum resource development in the area was established with development of the refinery in 1911,
6
prior to the City’s incorporation in 1917. The Specific Plan area is underlain by the El Segundo Oil Field,
where over 14 million barrels of oil and condensate were produced locally between 1935 and 1992.
Production has steadily declined since 1967.
Although there are several wells still operating in the City, there are no oil wells in operation within the
Specific Plan area and the City is not shown as containing mineral resources.
Regulatory Setting
Regulations and responsible agencies exist at the state level with regard to mineral resources and include:
Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975
Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources
Division of Mines and Geology
Checklist Discussion
a), b)No Impact.
No portion of the City, which includes the Specific Plan area, is delineated as a mineral resource or mineral
resource recovery site in the City’s General Plan. There are no active mines or mineral resource extraction
occurring in the City and all of the Downtown area is currently developed with land uses that are not
related to mining or mineral extraction. Therefore, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures
are required. No further evaluation of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
6
California Department of Conservation, Well Finder Map:
. Accessed
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/#openModal/-118.40111/33.91899/15
December 2022.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-50
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Mitigation
Impact Impact
Incorporated
13. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the
project in excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private
airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a
plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public
airport or public use airport, expose people residing
or working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
Noise Fundamentals
Sound is described in terms of amplitude (i.e., loudness) and frequency (i.e., pitch). The standard unit of
sound amplitude measurement is the decibel (dB). The dB scale is a logarithmic scale that describes the
physical intensity of the pressure vibrations that make up any sound. The pitch of the sound is related to
the frequency of the pressure vibration. Since the human ear is not equally sensitive to a given sound level
at all frequencies, a special frequency-dependent rating scale has been devised to relate noise to human
sensitivity. The A-weighted dB scale (dBA) provides this compensation by emphasizing frequencies in a
manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear.
Noise, on the other hand, is typically defined as unwanted sound audible at such a level that the sound
becomes an undesirable by-product of society’s normal day-to-day activities. Sound becomes unwanted
when it interferes with normal activities, causes actual physical harm, or results in adverse health effects.
The effects of noise on people can be placed into four general categories:
Subjective effects (e.g., dissatisfaction, annoyance);
Interference effects (e.g., communication, sleep, and learning interference);
Physiological effects (e.g., startle response); and
Physical effects (e.g., hearing loss).
The definition of noise as unwanted sound implies that it has an adverse effect, or causes a substantial
annoyance, to people and their environment. However, not every unwanted audible sound interferes with
normal activities, causes harm, or has adverse health effects. For unwanted audible sound (i.e., noise) to
be considered adverse, it must occur with sufficient frequency and at such a level that these adverse
impacts are reasonably likely to occur.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-51
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Vibration Fundamentals
Vibration can result from a source (e.g., train operations, motor vehicles, machinery equipment, etc.)
causing the adjacent ground to move and creating vibration waves that propagate through the soil to the
foundations of nearby buildings. This effect is referred to as groundborne vibration. The peak particle
velocity (PPV) or the root mean square (RMS) velocity is usually used to describe vibration levels. PPV is
defined as the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration level, while RMS is defined as the square
root of the average of the squared amplitude of the vibration level. PPV is typically used for evaluating
potential building damage, while RMS velocity in decibels (VdB) is typically more suitable for evaluating
human response.
Environmental Setting
Noise in the Specific Plan area comes from transportation sources, including highways, arterials, and
roadways; Los Angeles International Airport; and non-transportation sources, such as commercial
activities and various community activities. The City is also bounded to the north by Imperial Highway,
which is located approximately 1.0 mile north of the Specific Plan area. The noise environment in the
Specific Plan area is dominated by airport and vehicular traffic including vehicular generated noise along
Imperial Highway and other primary and secondary arterials. In addition, a number of other sources
contribute to the total noise environment. These noise sources include construction activities, power tools
and gardening equipment, loudspeakers, auto repair, radios, children playing and dogs barking.
Regulatory Setting
Various private and public agencies have established noise guidelines and standards to protect citizens
from potential hearing damage and other adverse physiological and social effects associated with noise.
Federal, state, regional, and local guidelines and include the following:
Federal Transit Administration and Federal Railroad Administration Standards
Federal Aviation Administration Standards
California Noise Control Act
California Code of Regulations
City of El Segundo General Plan
City of El Segundo Municipal Code
Checklist Discussion
a), b) Potentially Significant Impact.
Dependent on the distance and intensity of equipment used for any future projects in the Specific Plan
area, there could be project specific noise and vibration impacts associated with construction of future
projects. Furthermore, future development would involve demolition, site preparation, grading, building
construction, and paving activities that could generate noise and groundborne vibration during the
temporary construction period. Therefore, there could be a substantial temporary increase in ambient
noise levels and groundborne vibration in the vicinity of the Specific Plan area during project construction.
In addition, new vehicles trips generated by operation of new development could potentially result in
increased traffic noise levels in the project vicinity that could exceed the applicable noise standards.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-52
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Therefore, this issue could be a potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the
Programmatic EIR.
c) Less Than Significant Impact.
Los Angeles International Airport is located approximately 1.0 mile north of the Specific Plan area’s
northern border across Imperial Highway. The Los Angeles County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC)
prepared the Los Angeles County Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP), revised on December 1, 2004. The ALUP
provides for the orderly expansion of Los Angeles County’s public use airports and the areas surrounding
them. It is also intended to provide for the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public’s
exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards. In formulating the ALUP, the Los Angeles County ALUC
established provisions for safety, noise insulation, and the regulation of building height in areas adjacent
to each of the county’s public airports.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. As all areas of the Specific
Plan area are essentially built-out, all future development would be infill and/or replacement of existing
uses. As future development would only occur on sites currently or previously developed, impacts
resulting from construction of new development would be similar as under current conditions.
Therefore, neither adoption of the Specific Plan Update nor any future development within the Specific
Plan area would result in potential impacts associated with airport noise that do not currently exist.
Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. No further
evaluation of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-53
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with the Significant
Impact
Impact Incorporated Impact
Mitigation
14. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in
an area, either directly (for example, by proposing
new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b)Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
Environmental Setting
7
According to 2020 Department of Finance (DOF) estimates, the City has a total of 7,500 dwelling units. As
8
of 2020, the DOF determined that the City's population numbered 17,298.
Regulatory Setting
Regulations and plans exist at state, regional, and local levels related to populations and housing and
include:
California Government Code Section 65583 and 65584(a)(1)
Senate Bill 375
Southern California Association of Governments Connect SoCal
Regional Housing Needs Assessment
Checklist Discussion
a) Potentially Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. The proposed DSP update
would include development standards, including building form, massing, and articulation standards that
would increase building heights, reduce or eliminate stepbacks, and allow additional residential and office
use at higher densities. Density would be increased on sites within the DSP area through a form-based
approach. Objectives of the Specific Plan Update would encourage and facilitate the redevelopment of
underutilized sites within the Downtown area, including along primary transit corridors. Thus, the Specific
7
State of California Department of Finance, Table E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and
the State, 2020-2022, website: https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e-5-population-and-
housing-estimates-for-cities-counties-and-the-state-2020-2022/. Accessed December 2022.
8
State of California Department of Finance, Table E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and
https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e-5-population-and-
the State, 2020-2022, website:
housing-estimates-for-cities-counties-and-the-state-2020-2022/. Accessed December 2022.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-54
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Plan Update could generate new residents as well as employees. Therefore, this issue could be a
potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
b) Potentially Significant Impact.
A significant impact may occur if a project would result in displacement of existing housing units, including
people within occupied housing units, necessitating construction of replacement housing elsewhere. As the
objectives of the Specific Plan Update would encourage and facilitate the redevelopment of underutilized
sites within the Downtown area to accommodate anticipated future market demand, the implementation
of the Specific Plan Update could result in displacement. Therefore, this issue could be a potentially
significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-55
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
15. PUBLICSERVICES.Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental
ant environmental impacts, in order to maintain
facilities, the construction of which could cause signific
acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
c) Schools?
d) Parks?
e) Other public facilities?
Environmental Setting
Fire Protection
The El Segundo Fire Department (ESFD) provides fire protection and emergency medical services in the
City. The ESFD maintains 14 firefighters on duty 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The City has two fire
stations: Fire Station 1, located at 314 Main Street and Fire Station 2, located at 2261 E. Mariposa Avenue.
Fire Station 1 houses ESFD headquarters and six fighters responding on Engine 31, Rescue 31 and Battalion
31. Additionally, Fire Administration, Fire Prevention and Environmental Safety personnel work out of Fire
Station 1, making it an important facility for fire and medical response, as well as other business services
related to the Fire Department. Fire Station 2 has eight firefighters respond out of the station and staff
9
Engine 32, Truck 32 and Rescue 32. The City is divided into two districts for fire response, with Pacific
Coast Highway as the dividing line. Station 1 responds to calls west of Pacific Coast Highway and Station 2
responds east of Pacific Coast Highway. Depending on the nature of the emergency request, units may
cross over into the other district and coordinate resources to assist in response activities.
Police Protection
The El Segundo Police Department (ESPD) provides police protection in the City. The department’s
headquarters are located at 348 Main Street at the Civic Center Complex. The ESPD has an Administrative
Services Bureau and a Field Operations Bureau. The Administrative Bureau manages multiple Divisions in
the ESPD, including investigative, administrative, training, police property, crime scene investigations,
10
community engagement, personnel division, and police records. The Field Operations Bureau consists
11
of the Patrol Division and the Special Operations Division. The City is divided into two geographic patrol
9
El Segundo Fire Department, Operations, website: https://www.elsegundofd.org/suppression/operations.
Accessed December 2022.
10
El Segundo Police Department, Bureaus, website: https://www.elsegundopd.org/about-espd/bureaus. Accessed
December 2022.
11
El Segundo Police Department, Bureaus, website: https://www.elsegundopd.org/about-espd/bureaus. Accessed
December 2022.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-56
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
areas bisected by Pacific Coast Highway. The area west of Pacific Coast Highway is designated the West
12
Command and the area east of Pacific Coast Highway is designated the East Command.
Schools
Schools in the City are administered by the El Segundo Unified School District, which provides kindergarten
through twelfth grade public education services in El Segundo. Based on information in the school
district’s Board of Education Goals for Our Future: 2020-2040, the District does not have any issues with
13
capacity or inadequate facilities.
State Assembly Bill (AB) 2926 authorized school districts to assess all new development a fee to offset.
impacts proposed projects might have on the school facilities. Whenever possible, the Districts have
requested that developers provide full impact mitigation on development. The establishment of special
tax districts, full cost recovery agreements or the provision of relocatable classrooms in lieu of fees are
just a few examples of such mitigation measures.
Parks
The City of El Segundo's Community Services Department includes the Parks and Facilities division, which
is responsible for the developed parkland in the City. The City provides a wide variety of attractions and
amenities including more than 26 recreational facilities, including 15 parks, athletic fields, recreational
water amenities, a skate park, dog park and community garden. Additionally, the Department provides
the recreation classes, special events, sports league information, older adult social activities, youth drama
auditions and performance dates and performs landscape and tree maintenance year-round, provides
public transportation, volunteer opportunities and community service programs. Additionally, the City
owns the Lakes at El Segundo, an executive nine-hole golf course and two-story lighted driving range,
14
complete with a pro shop, cafe and banquet facilities. Per the City’s Rec and Parks Department, the City’s
parks currently provide approximately 3.5 acres of park space per 1,000 residents, which is within the
State of California Parks Department standard of 3.0 acres per 1,000 residents.
Other Public Facilities
The City has one library, the El Segundo Public Library, located at 111 West Mariposa Avenue. In addition
to printed materials, the Library has a digital library, history room, photo archives, event rooms, and a
15
cultural development program. On November 19, 2019, the El Segundo City Council adopted Ordinance
1594 establishing a Public Art or In-Lieu Fee Requirement and a Cultural Development Fund. The
requirement applies to certain commercial and industrial developments with a project cost exceeding
$2,000,000.
12
El Segundo Police Department, Patrol, website: https://www.elsegundopd.org/patrol. Accessed December 2022.
13
El Segundo Unified School District, District Goals, website: https://www.elsegundousd.net/page/district-goals.
Accessed December 2022.
14
El Segundo Rec, Parks & Library, Parks & Facilities Directory, website:
https://www.elsegundorecparks.org/parks-facilities/parks-facilities-directory. Accessed December 2022.
15
El Segundo Public Library, website: hhttps://www.elsegundolibrary.org/home-library. Accessed December 2022.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-57
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Regulatory Setting
Regulations and policies exist the state and local level with regard to public services and include:
California Mutual Aid Plan
Senate Bill 50
Quimby Act and Assembly Bill 1359
City of El Segundo General Plan
Checklist Discussion
a) Potentially Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. Implementation of the Specific
Plan Update could result in new development in the Downtown area that would increase the density of
residential, office, medical office, retail and restaurant uses, requiring, fire and emergency services,
thereby, increasing the overall number of emergency calls to the El Segundo Fire Department. Therefore,
this issue could be a potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the
Programmatic EIR.
b) Potentially Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. Implementation of the Specific
Plan Update could result in new development in the Downtown area of residential, office, medical office,
retail and restaurant uses, requiring, police services, thereby, increasing the overall number of emergency
calls to the El Segundo Police Department. Therefore, this issue could be a potentially significant impact
and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
c) Potentially Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. The Specific Plan area is
located within the El Segundo Unified School District boundaries and would generate students who would
attend the schools in this district. Therefore, this issue could be a potentially significant impact and will
be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
d) Potentially Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. Impacts would increase to
existing and proposed recreational facilities, from the additional population from new development in the
Specific Plan area. Therefore, this issue could be a potentially significant impact and will be further
evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
e) Potentially Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. Impacts would increase to
existing library facilities from the additional population from new development in the Specific Plan area.
Therefore, this issue could be a potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the
Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-58
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
16. RECREATION. Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational facilities, such
that substantial physical deterioration of the facility
would occur or be accelerated?
b)Include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities,
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Environmental Setting
The City of El Segundo's Community Services Department includes the Parks and Facilities division, which
is responsible for the developed parkland in the City. The City provides a wide variety of attractions and
amenities including more than 26 recreational facilities, including 15 parks, athletic fields, recreational
water amenities, a skate park, dog park, and community garden. Additionally, the Department provides
the recreation classes, special events, sports league information, older adult social activities, youth drama
auditions and performance dates and performs landscape and tree maintenance year-round, provides
16
public transportation, volunteer opportunities and community service programs. Per the City’s Rec and
Parks Department, the City’s parks currently provide approximately 3.5 acres of park space per 1,000
residents, which is within the State of California Parks Department standard of 3.0 acres per 1,000
residents.
Regulatory Setting
Regulations and policies exist the state and local level with regard to recreation and include:
California Mutual Aid Plan
Senate Bill 50
Quimby Act and Assembly Bill 1359
City of El Segundo General Plan
Checklist Discussion
a), b) Potentially Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan, which would potentially
increase development and thereby residential and visitor uses of City recreational facilities. This increase
in use has the potential to create impacts to existing recreational facilities from additional population
16
El Segundo Rec, Parks & Library, Parks & Facilities Directory, website:
https://www.elsegundorecparks.org/parks-facilities/parks-facilities-directory. Accessed December 2022.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-59
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
from new and denser development in the Specific Plan area. Therefore, this issue could be a potentially
significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-60
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
17. TRANSPORTATION.Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Environmental Setting
Existing Street System
Regional access to the City, which includes the Specific Plan area, is provided by the Glenn Anderson
Freeway (I-105), the San Diego Freeway (I-405), Pacific Coast Highway (CA-1) and Imperial Highway. Local
access within the City is provided by several major streets, including Aviation Boulevard, Douglas Street,
Nash Street, Continental Boulevard, Pacific Coast Highway, Washington Street, California Street, Center
Street, Sheldon Street, Main Street, Virginia Street, Vista Del Mar, Imperial Avenue, Maple Avenue,
Mariposa Avenue, Grand Avenue, El Segundo Boulevard, and Rosecrans Avenue. Major streets serving the
study area include Pacific Coast Highway and Aviation Boulevard in the north-south direction.
Transit Service
The City, which includes the Specific Plan area, is served by a variety of public transit options, including
local and regional bus lines, as well as the LA Metro rail system. The Metro 125 and Metro 232 local bus
routes contains multiple stops on Rosecrans Avenue, Pacific Coast Highway, Grand Avenue, and other
adjoining major streets in the City. Torrance Transit (Route 8), Beach Cities Transit Line (Route 109), and
Metro Rail C (Green) Line also serves the area.
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
The City of El Segundo provides marked, Class-II bicycle lanes along Rosecrans Avenue west of Pacific
Coast Highway, Grand Avenue west of the Downtown Specific Plan area, and Imperial Highway. The City
contains a mature network of streets and extensive pedestrian facilities, including sidewalks, crosswalks,
and pedestrian safety features. Approximately 10- to 16-foot sidewalks are provided on arterials
throughout the City. Narrower sidewalks are present on most collector and local streets in the City.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-61
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Regulatory Setting
Regulations and policies exist at the state, regional, and local levels as follows:
Senate Bill 743
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7l
South Bay Bicycle Master Plan
City of El Segundo General Plan Circulation Element
Checklist Discussion
a) Potentially Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. Implementation of the Specific
Plan Update could result in an increase in new development in the Downtown area of residential, office,
medical office, retail and restaurant uses beyond what currently exists. This new development would
require the use of a variety of construction vehicles throughout construction. Typical construction
schedules create trips outside of the traffic peak hours. It is anticipated that there would be no hauling
during the PM peak hour, and that construction workers would arrive at project sites prior to the AM peak
hour, which is typical construction industry practice.
Operation of new development in the Specific Plan area could generate new residents on-site in addition
to on-site employees and patrons of the commercial spaces, which would result in increased vehicle trips
on area roadways that could degrade the existing performance levels of roadway facilities. The project-
generated population could also increase the demand for and use of public transit, which may affect the
performance of existing transit conditions in the area. Therefore, this issue could be a potentially
significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
b) Potentially Significant Impact.
The Specific Plan Update could involve the addition of residential, office, medical office, retail and
restaurant uses to the Specific Plan area. Implementation of the Specific Plan Update could result in
temporary impacts to the circulation system. In addition, the Specific Plan Update could increase
development intensity which could result in increased vehicle trips on area roadways and associated VMT.
Therefore, this issue could be a potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the
Programmatic EIR.
c) Less Than Significant Impact.
The Specific Plan Update does not include any specific development of land. Any new development
proposed under the Specific Plan Update would require that access locations be designed to City
standards and to provide adequate sight distance, sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian movement
controls that meet the City’s requirements to protect pedestrian safety. Street trees and other potential
impediments to adequate driver and pedestrian visibility would be required to be minimal and the City
would require that pedestrian entrances separated from vehicular driveways provide access from the
adjacent streets. As a result, the Specific Plan Update would not substantially increase hazards or conflicts
due to a geometric design feature, or result in inadequate emergency access. Therefore, implementation
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-62
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
of the Specific Plan Update would have a less than significant impact, and no mitigation measures are
required. No further evaluation of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
d) Less Than Significant Impact.
Projects proposed pursuant to the Specific Plan Update would be reviewed to ensure that new
development would be subject to provisions within the City’s Fire Code regarding emergency access.
Likewise, any new development would be subject to the City Fire Code requirements and Fire Department
conditions of approval.
Construction activities have the potential to temporarily impact traffic and vehicle speeds on adjacent
roadways; however, these impacts would be temporary and emergency access to roadways, would not
be blocked by project construction. Furthermore, project applicants would coordinate with the City to
ensure appropriate construction staging areas and adequate emergency vehicle access to project sites
and adjacent roadways are maintained throughout construction periods.
The Specific Plan Update could include construction of new buildings consisting of residential, office,
medical office, retail and restaurant uses. As required by the El Segundo Fire Department, future projects
would be designed to accommodate emergency access, including police and fire access. Additionally,
applicants would submit a Fire/Life Safety Plan that includes emergency site access during project
construction, permanent Fire Department access during operation, the locations of fire hydrants and
sprinkler systems, and fire alarm system specifications prior to issuance of building permits for a project.
Therefore, the Specific Plan Update would not result in inadequate emergency access during project
construction and operation and impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are
required. No further evaluation of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-63
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact with Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Consultation with a California Native American tribe that has requested
such consultation may assist a lead agency in determining whether the project may adversely affect tribal cultural
resources, and if so, how such effects may be avoided or mitigated. Whether or not consultation has been
requested, would the project cause a substantial adverse change in a site, feature, place, cultural landscape,
sacred place, or object, with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, which is any of the following:
a.Would the project cause a substantial adverse change
in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined
in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural value to a
California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
Environmental Setting
Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52, Gatto. Native Americans: California Environmental Quality Act) and CEQA Public
Resources Code Section 21080.31, subdivisions (b), (d)), requires a lead agency to consult with any
California Native American tribe that requests consultation and is traditionally and culturally affiliated
with the geographic area of a proposed project.
California Government Code Section 65352.3 (adopted pursuant to the requirements of Senate Bill (SB)
18) requires local governments to contact, refer plans to, and consult with tribal organizations prior to
making a decision to adopt or amend a general or specific plan, or to designate open space that includes
Native American Cultural Places. The tribal organizations eligible to consult have traditional lands in a local
government’s jurisdiction, and are identified, upon request, by the Native American Heritage Commission
(NAHC). As noted in the California Office of Planning and Research’s Tribal Consultation Guidelines (2005),
“the intent of SB 18 is to provide California Native American tribes an opportunity to participate in local
land use decisions at an early planning stage, for the purpose of protecting, or mitigating impacts to
cultural places.”
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-64
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Regulatory Setting
The regulation that guides the consideration and treatment of tribal cultural resources is:
Assembly Bill 52
Senate Bill 18
Checklist Discussion
a) i), Potentially Significant Impact.
AB 52, signed into law on September 25, 2014, requires lead agencies to evaluate a project’s potential to
impact Tribal Cultural Resources (TCR) and establishes a formal notification and, if requested, consultation
process for California Native American Tribes as part of CEQA. TCR includes sites, features, places, cultural
landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe that are
eligible for inclusion in the California Register or included in a local register of historical resources. AB 52
also gives lead agencies the discretion to determine, supported by substantial evidence, whether a
resource qualifies as a TCR. Consultation is required upon request by a California Native American tribe
that has previously requested that the City provide it with notice of such projects, and that is traditionally
and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a project. Therefore, this issue could be a potentially
significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
a) ii), Potentially Significant Impact.
Under AB 52, if a lead agency determines that a project may cause a substantial adverse change to a TCR,
the lead agency must consider measures to mitigate that impact. PRC Section 21074 provides a definition of
a TCR. In brief, in order to be considered a TCR, a resource must be either: 1) listed, or determined to be
eligible for listing, on the national, State, or local register of historic resources, or 2) a resource that the lead
agency chooses, in its discretion supported by substantial evidence, to treat as a TCR. In the latter instance,
the lead agency must determine that the resource meets the criteria for listing in the State register of historic
resources or City Designated Cultural Resource. In applying those criteria, a lead agency shall consider the
value of the resource to the tribe. As mentioned above, a TCR includes sites, features, places, cultural
landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe that are
eligible for inclusion in the California Register, are included in a local register of historical resources, or are
otherwise determined by the lead agency to be significant based on substantial evidence. A substantial
adverse change to a TCR is a significant effect on the environment under CEQA. Because future projects in
the Specific Plan area could include excavation to depths not previously disturbed, and given that the AB 52
Tribal notification/consultation process has not been completed to date, this issue could be a potentially
significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-65
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
19. UTILITIESANDSERVICESYSTEMS.Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of
new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or
storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas,
or telecommunications facilities, the construction
or relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and multiple dry
years?
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment
of solid waste reduction goals?
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management
and reduction statutes and regulations related to
solid waste?
Environmental Setting
Water
Water service in the City, which includes the Specific Plan area, is provided by the City of El Segundo’s
Water Division, which is a partner of the West Basin Municipal Water District (WBMWD). The WBMWD
provides wholesale potable water to 17 cities, serving approximately 900,000 people. According to the
West Basin Municipal Water District’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), which is updated
every five years, water supply in the City in 2020 consists of: 15 to 20% groundwater; 65% imported water;
17
and 17% recycled water.
Wastewater
Wastewater in the City, which includes the Specific Plan area, is treated by the Sanitation District of Los
Angeles County (the Sanitation District) at two facilities: the Hyperion Treatment Plant (HTP) and the Joint
Water Pollution Control Plant (JWPCP). The City of El Segundo has an agreement with the City of Los
17
West Basin Municipal Water District 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, June 2021.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-66
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Angeles that permits an average flow of 2.75 million gallons per day of wastewater treatment and disposal
capacity. Before discharge, the treated wastewater is disinfected with hypochlorite and sent to the Pacific
Ocean through a network of outfalls. These outfalls extend two miles off the Palos Verdes Peninsula to a
depth of 200 feet. The JWPCP must comply with its current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Permit, which regulates the plant’s discharges. The City has a System Evaluation and
Capacity Assurance Plan and Rehabilitation and Replacement Program that evaluates the City’s existing
sewer system and recommends improvements to the system to serve the City’s future needs.
Senate Bill 1087 also mandates priority sewage collection and treatment service to housing developments
providing units affordable to lower-income households.
Dry Utilities
Southern California Edison (SCE) and Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) provide electricity and
natural gas services in the City, which includes the Specific Plan area.
Solid Waste
Solid waste disposal in the City, which includes the Specific Plan area, is provided by EDCO, a private
company. EDCO provides residential and commercial pickup, including green waste disposal, recycling,
and bulky item pickup. In 2011, AB 341 was adopted establishing a policy goal that 75% of statewide solid
waste should be reduced, recycled, or composted by 2020. This is an expansion of previous state goals to
divert 50% of community-wide waste. This measure complies with state goals of waste reduction.
Checklist Discussion
a), b), c), d), e) Potentially Significant Impact.
The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. Given the built-out character
of El Segundo, most areas are already served with water and wastewater infrastructure and solid waste
services. Existing water delivery, wastewater collection infrastructure and solid waste disposal is available
to all properties located in the Downtown area.
The Specific Plan Update could increase the construction and operation of new development in the
Downtown area comprised of residential, office, medical office, retail and restaurant uses, which could
potentially increase demand for electricity, natural gas, and water, as well as increased generation of solid
waste and wastewater compared to existing conditions. The Specific Plan Update could also require
upgrades to the existing utilities. Therefore, this issue could be a potentially significant impact and will
be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-67
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
20. WILDFIRE: If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a
wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary
or ongoing impacts to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
Environmental Setting
The City of El Segundo, which includes the Specific Plan area, is completely developed with urban uses
and is not located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The closest State-designated fire hazard zone
is at the Ballona Wetlands, more than 6.5 miles north from the Specific Plan area and open space areas
around the Inglewood Oil Fields and Kenneth Hahn State Recreation Area, more than nine miles north
from the Specific Plan area. Both Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones are separated from the Specific
Plan area by urbanized development, including Los Angeles International Airport and I-405.
Regulatory Setting
Regulations exist at federal, state, and local levels with regard to wildfire include:
Los Angeles County 2019 All-Hazards Mitigation Plan
City of El Segundo General Plan
Checklist Discussion
a), b), c), d) No Impact.
According to CALFire, the City, which includes the Specific Plan area, is not located in a Very High Fire
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-68
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
18
Hazard Severity Zone. The closest State-designated fire hazard zone is at the Ballona Wetlands, more
than 6.5 miles north from the Specific Plan area and open space areas around the Inglewood Oil Fields
and Kenneth Hahn State Recreation Area, more than nine miles north from the Specific Plan area.
Future development within the Specific Plan area would not be subject to any more risk than other
development in the City not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Furthermore, future
development would be required to comply with applicable codes, regulations, and standard measures for
fire protection. Developers would be required to provide proof of compliance with applicable building and
fire code requirements, as well as El Segundo Fire Department Plan Check requirements. These
requirements include, but are not limited to, items such as types of roofing materials, building
construction, fire hydrant flows, hydrant spacing, access and design, fire sprinkler systems, and other
hazard reduction programs such as the Fire/Life Safety Plan, as set forth by the El Segundo Fire
Department and the Uniform Fire Code. Therefore, there would be no impact related to wildfire and
emergency response or evacuation plans, exposure to pollutant concentrations, exacerbated fire risk, or
flooding or landslides as a result of post-fire slope instability, and no mitigation measures are required.
No further evaluation of this topic is required in the Programmatic EIR.
18
Cal Fire, State Responsibility Area Viewer, website: https://calfire-
forestry.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=468717e399fa4238ad86861638765ce1.
Accessed: December 2022.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-69
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
No
Significant Impact with Significant
Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
21. MANDATORYFINDINGSOFSIGNIFICANCE.Would the project:
a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal, or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental effects of
a project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.)
c) Have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
Checklist Discussion
a) Potentially Significant Impact.
In Section 4, Biological Resources, it was found that implementation of the Specific Plan Update would
not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or substantially reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Potential impacts to fish, wildlife,
and plants would be less than significant.
As discussed in Section 5, Cultural Resources, Section 7, Geology and Soils, and Section 18, Tribal Cultural
Resources, there is the potential for impacts to historic resources, and previously undiscovered
archaeological, paleontological, and tribal cultural resources. Therefore, these issues will be analyzed in
detail in a Programmatic EIR.
b) Potentially Significant Impact.
As discussed in Sections 1 through 20, above, the Specific Plan Update may result in significant impacts to
aesthetics, air quality, cultural resources, energy, GHG emissions, hazards and hazardous materials,
hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, transportation, tribal
cultural resources, and utilities. Potential cumulative impacts in these issue areas, for which potentially
significant impacts have been identified, will be analyzed in detail in a Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-70
II.INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
c) Potentially Significant Impact.
In general, impacts to human beings are associated with air quality, GHG emissions, hazards and
hazardous materials, and noise. As discussed in Section 3, Air Quality, Section 8, Greenhouse Gas
Emissions, Section 9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Section 13, Noise, impacts related to these
issue areas could potentially be significant. Therefore, the Specific Plan Update could potentially have
harmful environmental effects that could affect humans either directly or indirectly. Therefore, this issue
could be a potentially significant impact and will be further evaluated in detail in the Programmatic EIR.
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update City of El Segundo
Initial Study January 2023
II-71
APPENDIX A.3: NOP PUBLIC COMMENTS
February13, 2023
SubmittedElectronically
Paul Samaras
City of El SegundoPlanning Division
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Email:psamaras@elsegundo.org
RE: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental
Impact Report for the Proposed El Segundo Downtown
Specific Plan Update, SCH 2023010196
Dear Paul Samaras:
On behalf of the Los Angeles Conservancy, I am writing to comment
on the Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) for the proposed El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan
(DSP) Update. The proposed updateis a revision to the existing El
Segundo Downtown Specific Plan, which serves as land use and
zoning for properties within the boundaries of the DSP area. The
project would revise the existing DSP planning districts, amend
General Plan and zoning designations on eight parcels, andinclude
mobility enhancements. Additionally, it would include public
improvements and streetscape guidelines, private urban form
criteria, permitted land uses, development standards, mobility and
infrastructure improvements, an implementation plan, and
administration processes.
As noted in the Initial Study (IS) the plan would cause
The following are some of the ways the City might mitigate those
impacts.
I. Update the 2014 historic resources survey and historic context
statement as part of the project
As a means tdowntown area, the Conservancy
recommends the City of El Segundo update the 2014 historic resources survey, which
the City conducted at the time of the previous DSP to capture any properties that may
have gained significance during the previous nine years.
As a companion to the survey historic context statements provide a framework for
identifying and evaluating historic resources within the survey area. The context is a
narrative that may cover themes including architectural, social, ethnic, and cultural
topics. Contexts are a powerful tool for future landmark designations at the local, state,
and national levels.
Recommendation: Update the existing Downtown historic resources survey to reflect
current conditions and complete a historic context statement to provide a framework for
identifying and evaluating historic resources within the survey area.
II. Incorporate stronger language that promotes historic preservation
into the proposed DSP Update
within the project area. These are the Main Street District and the Richmond Street
including the Old Town Music Hall. The Conservancy appreciates the proposed land use
updates that would celebrate the historic nature of the area and guidelines maintaining
the existing scale, massing, and character of the area. In addition to these policies, we
encourage the city to incorporate language promoting the preservation of historic
buildings so the historic resources that contribute to the character of downtown are not
razed for new construction.
Recommendation: Incorporate language within the DSP Update that emphasizes
historic preservation.
III. Creation of a legacy businesses program
Beyond the physical built environment, the City of El Segundo should look at developing
a legacy business program for the historic downtown commercial area. Legacy
businesses are long-standing neighborhood anchors that contribute to a sense of place.
Often 20 years of operation is the minimum threshold for a legacy business.
In recent years, cities including San Francisco, San Antonio, Los Angeles, and Long
Beach have adopted programs that either provide financial incentives or create a
promotional program that attracts patrons. The Conservancy played an important role
in the formation of
discussing such a program with the City of El Segundo.
IV. oject team
Lastly, the Conservancy would appreciate the opportunity to meet with the City of El
project team to discuss the impacts of the DSP Update on historic resources
and ways the City might mitigate those impacts through a historic resources survey and
creation of a legacy business program among others. We regularly work with cities
across the county to find win-win outcomes to historic preservation issues.
In summary, the Conservancy recommends the following as potential ways to mitigate
any significant impacts to historic resources.
Update existing historic resources survey and context statement
Incorporate language that promotes historic preservation
Creation of a legacy business program
About the Los Angeles Conservancy:
The Los Angeles Conservancy is the largest local historic preservation organization in
the United States, with nearly 5,000 members throughout the Los Angeles area.
Established in 1978, the Conservancy works to preserve and revitalize the significant
architectural and cultural heritage of Los Angeles County through advocacy and
education.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at (213) 430-4203 or afine@laconservancy.org
should you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Adrian Scott Fine
Senior Director of Advocacy
January 31, 2023
Ref. DOC 6807280
Mr. Paul Samaras
City of El Segundo
Community Development Department
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Dear Mr. Samaras:
NOP Response to El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
The Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (Districts) received a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft
Environmental Impact Report for the subject project on January 13, 2023. We offer the following comments
regarding sewerage service:
Section 19 Utilities and Service Systems, Environmental Setting, pages II-66 and II-67: the first paragraph
under the Wastewater subsection stated that “Wastewater in the City, which includes the Specific Plan area,
is treated by the Sanitation District of Los Angeles County (the Sanitation District) at two facilities: the
Hyperion Treatment Plant (HTP) and the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant (JWPCP).” Please note that
the Districts does not own the Hyperion Treatment Plant. While a portion of wastewater generated within
the City of El Segundo is treated at the Districts’ JWPCP, wastewater generated by the proposed project
will be treated by the City of Los Angeles’ Hyperion Treatment System. Questions regarding sewerage
service for the proposed project should be directed to the City of Los Angeles’ Department of Public Works.
If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (562) 908-4288, extension 2743, or
mandyhuffman@lacsd.org.
Very truly yours,
Mandy Huffman
Environmental Planner
Facilities Planning Department
MNH:mnh
DOC 6820136.D99 A Century of Service
SENT VIA E-MAIL: January 30, 2023
psamaras@elsegundo.org
Paul Samaras, Principal Planner
City of El Segundo
Community Development Department
350 Main Street
El Segundo, California 90245
Notice of Preparation of a Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Report for
the El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) staff appreciates the opportunity to
comment on the above-mentioned document. Our comments are recommendations on the analysis of
potential air quality impacts from the Proposed Project that should be included in the Programmatic
Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). Please send a copy of the PEIR upon its completion and public
release directly to South Coast AQMD as copies of the PEIR submitted to the State Clearinghouse are not
forwarded. In addition, please send all appendices and technical documents related to the air
quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas analyses and electronic versions of all emission calculation
spreadsheets, and air quality modeling and health risk assessment input and output files (not PDF
files). Any delays in providing all supporting documentation for our review will require additional
review time beyond the end of the comment period.
CEQA Air Quality Analysis
Staff recommends that the Lead Agency use South Coast AQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook and
1
website as guidance when preparing the air quality and greenhouse gas analyses. It is also recommended
2
that the Lead Agency use the CalEEMod land use emissions software, which can estimate pollutant
emissions from typical land use development and is the only software model maintained by the California
Air Pollution Control Officers Association.
South Coast AQMD has developed both regional and localized significance thresholds. South Coast
AQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency quantify criteria pollutant emissions and compare the
3
emissions and
4
localized significance thresholds (LSTs) to determine air quality impacts. The
localized analysis can be conducted by either using the LST screening tables or performing dispersion
modeling.
The Lead Agency should identify any potential adverse air quality impacts that could occur from all
phases of the Proposed Project and all air pollutant sources related to the Proposed Project. Air quality
impacts from both construction (including demolition, if any) and operations should be calculated.
Construction-related air quality impacts typically include, but are not limited to, emissions from the use of
1
QA Handbook and other resources for preparing air quality analyses can be found at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook.
2
CalEEMod is available free of charge at: www.caleemod.com.
3
e found at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf.
4
South Coast AQMD guidance for performing a localized air quality analysis can be found at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/localized-significance-thresholds.
Paul Samaras 2 January 30, 2023
heavy-duty equipment from grading, earth-loading/unloading, paving, architectural coatings, off-road
mobile sources (e.g., heavy-duty construction equipment) and on-road mobile sources (e.g., construction
worker vehicle trips, material transport trips, and hauling trips). Operation-related air quality impacts may
include, but are not limited to, emissions from stationary sources (e.g., boilers and air pollution control
devices), area sources (e.g., solvents and coatings), and vehicular trips (e.g., on- and off-road tailpipe
emissions and entrained dust). Air quality impacts from indirect sources, such as sources that generate or
attract vehicular trips, should be included in the analysis. Furthermore, emissions from the overlapping
construction and operational activities should be combined and compared to South Coast AQMD
regional air quality CEQA operational thresholds to determine the level of significance.
If the Proposed Project generates diesel emissions from long-term construction or attracts diesel-fueled
vehicular trips, especially heavy-duty diesel-fueled vehicles, it is recommended that the Lead Agency
5
perform a mobile source health risk assessment.
Sensitive receptors are people that have an increased sensitivity to air pollution or environmental
contaminants and include schools, daycare centers, nursing homes, elderly care facilities, hospitals, and
residential dwelling units. The Proposed Project will include, among others, 300 residential units, and to
facilitate the purpose of a PEIR as an informational document, it is recommended that the Lead Agency
56
perform a mobile source health risk assessment to disclose the potential health risks.
In the event that implementation of the Proposed Project requires a permit from South Coast AQMD,
South Coast AQMD should be identified as a Responsible Agency for the Proposed Project in the Draft
PEIR. The assumptions in the air quality analysis in the PEIR will be the basis for evaluating the permit
under CEQA and imposing permit conditions and limits. Questions on permits should be directed to
-3385.
Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and
7
Local Planning includes suggested policies that local governments can use in their General Plans or
through local planning to prevent or reduce potential air pollution impacts and protect public health. It is
recommended that the Lead Agency review this Guidance Document as a tool when making local
planning and land use decisions.
Mitigation Measures
In the event that the Proposed Project results in significant adverse air quality impacts, CEQA requires
that all feasible mitigation measures that go beyond what is required by law be utilized to minimize these
impacts. Any impacts resulting from mitigation measures must also be analyzed. Several resources to
assist the Lead Agency with identifying potential mitigation measures for the Proposed Project include
8
So nd
9
Reporting Plan for the 2022 Air Quality Management Plan, and Southern California Association of
-2045 Regional Transportation
10
Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy..
5
South Coast AQMDuidance for performing a mobile source health risk assessment can be found at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/mobile-source-toxics-analysis.
6
Ibid.
7
South Coast AQMD. 2005. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning.
Available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/air-quality-guidance/complete-guidance-document.pdf.
8
https://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook
9
2022 Air Quality Management Plan can be found at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/clean-
air-plans/air-quality-mgt-plan (Chapter 4 - Control Strategy and Implementation).
10
Southern California Assoc-2045 RTP/SCS can be found at:
https://www.connectsocal.org/Documents/PEIR/certified/Exhibit-A_ConnectSoCal_PEIR.pdf.
Paul Samaras 3 January 30, 2023
South Coast AQMD staff is available to work with the Lead Agency to ensure that air quality, greenhouse
gas, and health risk impacts from the Proposed Project are accurately evaluated and mitigated where
feasible. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at swang1@aqmd.gov.
Sincerely,
Sam Wang
Sam Wang
Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR
Planning, Rule Development & Implementation
SW
LAC230117-02
Control Number
From:Neil Cadman
To:Samaras, Paul
Subject:Downtown Specific Plan
Date:Friday, January 27, 2023 5:44:24 PM
Attachments:image001.png
Hi Paul.
Making a comment regarding the specific plan since I will not be able to attend the meeting on
2/2/2023:
I am opposed, as the owner of a building on the 200 block of Richmond Street, to a permanent
closing for restaurant/outdoor dining without a thorough review of a plan that specifies equity for
each and every property on the street with regards to square footage and loss of parking for
businesses. Any usage that resembles what was just removed will be vehemently opposed.
Thank you.
®
Neil R. Cadman, CPM
President
214 Main Street #361
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-606-5894
ncadman@cadmangroup.net
www.cadmangroup.net
DRE #01061980
From:Monica Davis
To:Samaras, Paul
Cc:Miller-Zarneke, Tracey; Barbara Boland, Blue Butterfly, Master Gardener; Monica Davis; Anne Dalkey El Segundo
Blue Butterfly Ann Dalkey,; Sassoon, Elias; Anne Dalkey El Segundo Blue Butterfly Ann Dalkey,
Subject:Downtown Specific Plan, Native plant friendly and El Segundo Blue Butterfly habitat restoration
Date:Friday, January 13, 2023 9:49:13 AM
To the City Council, the Environmental committee, and Publics Works,
I am Monica Davis and I am one of the representatives of the Blue Butterfly Conservancy.
Our sole purpose is to support the Endangered El Segundo Blue Butterflies.
I love our little city and the rare butterfly that was named after it which has become a city
mascot. Our city and schools have adopted this endangered species, but what has our city done
to support the needed habitat for its survival? The city of Redondo Beach, the LAX flight path
and the Ballona Wetlands have planted habitat. What has the city of El Segundo done to
support the Blues, well I am here to help.
I am working with Parks and Rec to identify locations for future planting of the Sea Cliff
Buckwheat needed for the species survival.
I would like to propose that the Downtown Specific Plan include specific habit and native
plants that support the El Segundo Blues. If you plant it they will come! Wouldn't it be
AWESOME to walk into city hall and see our little mascot making a comeback due to the
efforts of the city planners. All of the planters on Main Street could have habitat planted to
support the Blue Butterflies as well. Once established, these plants need little to no water and
very limited care. Most important, the community would love to see these miraculous little
butterflies up and down our neighborhood streets. Why our Mayor, Drew Boyles was thrilled,
after living in the city some 20 years to see his first Blue Butterfly. I showed him the small
area where the Blues have survived, on our dunes.
Please take a stand to bring back an endangered species, by planting habitat that is native to
our area and our El Segundo Blue Butterflies.
Respectfully,
Monica Davis restoration
From:Monica Davis
To:Samaras, Paul
Subject:Traffic concern
Date:Friday, February 10, 2023 4:35:34 PM
Paul,
This is Monica Davis and we've met at the last downtown specific plan. At the end of the
meeting you mentioned if anybody had any other concerns to speak with you. I'm not sure if
it's only regards to the dentist plan or other issues in the city. I was going to bring up my
concern on the traffic flow pattern on Franklin Street heading east west. I drive it regularly to
my physical therapy appointment and it's challenging because sometimes it stops signs go
four-way , sometimes two eggs stop going east west and sometimes two-way stop going north
south it's unpredictable and troublesome. I was going to bring it up to you a couple weeks ago
but then decided not to. Just the other day my neighbor had a bad accident on Franklin
somebody ran a stop sign and hit her car with three children. I'm not sure if this is something
your department evaluates or if you could forward this email to whomever addresses traffic
flow patterns stop signs and the like. I feel like this street needs every evaluation for safety.
Thank you for your time,
Monica Davis
From:Angela Edwards
To:Samaras, Paul
Subject:El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Comment
Date:Friday, January 20, 2023 8:18:25 AM
Dear Paul,
I'm a home owner/resident of El Segundo and I’m imploring the commission to include a walk street. My family and
I have loved the use of Richmond during the pandemic and it has become a fixture of our routine and one of our
favorite aspects of our community. It increases the accessibility of downtown for pedestrians and encourages the
sense of community and the small town feel that we love so much. It has provided the perfect meeting place for
friends and extended family to come together and enjoy our beautiful town and support the local businesses.
Especially because we have a newborn and are still trying to be safe and be outdoors with others as much as
possible.
Please do not take this favorite city perk away from us based on the opinions of a small few, I know that all of our
neighbors agree and feel the same about wanting to keep the walk street.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Angela
Angela Edwards
333 Lomita St
El Segundo, CA 90245
From:Anthony Edwards
To:Samaras, Paul
Subject:El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Comment
Date:Thursday, January 19, 2023 5:53:00 PM
Hello,
As a resident of El Segundo with a family, I’m imploring the commission to include a walk
street. We loved the use of Richmond during Covid and need to have something like that
continue. Not only does it increase the accessibility of downtown for pedestrians, but it also
increases the small town feel that we like so much.
Please do not cave to the loud grumpy minority that does not want a walk street, the vast
majority of residents that I have spoken to want a walk street!
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Best,
Anthony
Anthony Edwards
333 Lomita St, El Segundo, CA 90245
From:Nadine Currimjee
To:Samaras, Paul
Cc:Sassoon, Elias; Miller-Zarneke, Tracey; Monica Davis; Barbara Boland, Blue Butterfly, Master Gardener; Anne
Dalkey El Segundo Blue Butterfly Ann Dalkey,
Subject:Downtown Specific Plan - comment in support of native plants and El Segundo Blue Butterfly habitat restoration
Date:Saturday, February 4, 2023 2:34:38 PM
Dear Mr Samaras,
I am writing in support of Monica Davis’ email sent a few weeks ago.
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if through a slightly different intent and approach our city’s green
spaces could become regenerative green corridors which support biodiversity and surround
residents with beautiful and diverse native plants adapted to the local conditions?
The community at large would benefit from California native landscapes being planted to
replace thirsty expanses of grass however big or small (parkways) in the Downtown area. This
could create a showcase of judiciously selected plants (with signage) to inspire residents to
convert their own lawns thereby contributing to the creation of a network of productive green
corridors, public and private, which would sustain so many insects, birds and other wildlife
whilst saving water during droughts and absorbing and potentially storing water during
periods of heavy rain with the help of swales. See this “rain garden” implementation by Studio
Petrichor: https://www.instagram.com/reel/CoPryg_DwX0/?igshid=YWJhMjlhZTc=
And more here:
https://studio-petrichor.com/team-petrichor-in-your-community/
And here:
https://mailchi.mp/f2f65dfeea63/shawn-maestretti-garden-architecture-is-now-studio-
petrichor-15457465
For reference, planting simply drought tolerant plants does not fulfill the same role with
regards to biodiversity and can sometimes be harmful; for example see the link below about
the ubiquitous Mexican feather grass in El Segundo which is on the Do Not Plant list for
California https://plantright.org/invasive/stipanassella-tenuissima/
The "El Segundo Blue Butterfly”, amongst many others, needs you!
https://www.latimes.com/lifestyle/story/2023-01-26/blue-butterflies-in-los-a
Best regards,
Nadine Currimjee-Quane
Nadine Currimjee-Quane
nadine.currimjee@gmail.com
On Jan 13, 2023, at 1:02 PM, Samaras, Paul <PSamaras@elsegundo.org> wrote:
Good afternoon Ms. Davis,
Thank you for submitting this comment on the Downtown Specific Plan Update project.
We will make sure it is part of the record and considered when the Planning
Commission and City Council make decisions on the project.
Thank you,
Paul Samaras, AICP | Principal Planner
City of El Segundo Community Development Department
350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA 90245
www.elsegundo.org | ElSegundoBusiness.com | DestinationElSegundo.com
<image001.png>
From: Monica Davis <monicawdavis@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2023 9:49 AM
To: Samaras, Paul <PSamaras@elsegundo.org>
Cc: Miller-Zarneke, Tracey <tmillerzarneke@elsegundoccb.org>; Barbara Boland, Blue
Butterfly, Master Gardener <barbara.boland@mac.com>; Monica Davis
<monicawdavis@gmail.com>; Anne Dalkey El Segundo Blue Butterfly Ann Dalkey,
<nadine.currimjee@gmail.com>; Sassoon, Elias <esassoon@elsegundo.org>; Anne
Dalkey El Segundo Blue Butterfly Ann Dalkey, <abdalkey@verizon.net>
Subject: Downtown Specific Plan, Native plant friendly and El Segundo Blue Butterfly
habitat restoration
To the City Council, the Environmental committee, and Publics Works,
I am Monica Davis and I am one of the representatives of the Blue Butterfly
Conservancy. Our sole purpose is to support the Endangered El Segundo Blue
Butterflies.
I love our little city and the rare butterfly that was named after it which has become a
city mascot. Our city and schools have adopted this endangered species, but what has
our city done to support the needed habitat for its survival? The city of Redondo Beach,
the LAX flight path and the Ballona Wetlands have planted habitat. What has the city of
El Segundo done to support the Blues, well I am here to help.
I am working with Parks and Rec to identify locations for future planting of the Sea Cliff
Buckwheat needed for the species survival.
I would like to propose that the Downtown Specific Plan include specific habit and
native plants that support the El Segundo Blues. If you plant it they will come! Wouldn't
it be AWESOME to walk into city hall and see our little mascot making a comeback due
to the efforts of the city planners. All of the planters on Main Street could have habitat
planted to support the Blue Butterflies as well. Once established, these plants need
little to no water and very limited care. Most important, the community would love to
see these miraculous little butterflies up and down our neighborhood streets. Why our
Mayor, Drew Boyles was thrilled, after living in the city some 20 years to see his first
Blue Butterfly. I showed him the small area where the Blues have survived, on our
dunes.
Please take a stand to bring back an endangered species, by planting habitat that is
native to our area and our El Segundo Blue Butterflies.
Respectfully,
Monica Davis restoration
P: (626) 381-9248139 South Hudson Avenue
F: (626) 389-5414Suite 200
Mitchell M. Tsai
E: info@mitchtsailaw.comPasadena, California 91101
Attorney At Law
VIA E-MAIL
February 20, 2023
Tracy Sherill Weaver, City Clerk
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Em: tweaver@elsegundo.org
Paul Samaras, Principal Planner
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Em: psamaras@elsegundo.org
RE: City of El Segundo’sDowntown Specific Plan Update–Agenda
Item#14
Honorable Mayor Boyles and Council Members,
On behalf of the Southwest Mountain States RegionalCouncil of Carpenters
(“SouthwestCarpenters” or “SWMSRCC”), my Office is submitting these
comments for the City of El Segundo’s(“City”)February 21, 2023 City Council
Meeting regarding the ElSegundo Downtown Specific Plan Update (“Project”).
The Southwest Carpenters is a labor union representing over 63,000 union carpenters
in 10states, including California, and has a strong interest in well-orderedland use
planning and in addressing the environmental impacts of development projects.
Individual members of the Southwest Carpenters live, work,and recreate in the City
and surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project’s
environmental impacts.
The Southwest Carpenters expressly reserves the right to supplement these comments
at or prior to hearings on the Project, and at any later hearing andproceeding related
to this Project. Gov. Code,§ 65009, subd. (b); Pub. Res. Code,§ 21177, subd. (a); see
Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. Bakersfield(2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1199-
City ofEl Segundo–El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
February 20, 2023
Page 2 of 8
1203; see also Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Water Dist. (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 1109,
1121.
The Southwest Carpenters incorporates by reference all comments raising issues
regarding the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) submitted prior to certification of
the EIR for the Project. See Citizens for Clean Energy v City of Woodland (2014) 225
Cal.App.4th 173, 191 (finding that any party who has objected to the project’s
environmental documentation may assert any issue timely raised by other parties).
Moreover, the Southwest Carpenters requests that the City provide notice for any and
all notices referring or related to the Project issued under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code, § 21000 et seq.), and the
California Planning and Zoning Law (“Planning and Zoning Law”) (Gov. Code, §§
65000–65010). California Public Resources Code Sections 21092.2, and 21167(f) and
California Government Code Section 65092 require agencies to mail such notices to
any person who has filed a written request for them with the clerk of the agency’s
governing body.
I. THE CITY SHOULD REQUIRE THE USE OF A LOCAL
WORKFORCE TO BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY’S ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT
The City should require the Project to be built using a local workers who have
graduated from a Joint Labor-Management Apprenticeship Program approved by the
State of California, have at least as many hours of on-the-job experience in the
applicable craft which would be required to graduate from such a state-approved
apprenticeship training program, or who are registered apprentices in a state-approved
apprenticeship training program.
Community benefits such as local hire can also be helpful to reduce environmental
impacts and improve the positive economic impact of the Project. Local hire
provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less
of the Project site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas
emissions, and provide localized economic benefits. As environmental consultants
Matt Hagemann and Paul E. Rosenfeld note:
\[A\]ny local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length
from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of
construction-related GHG emissions, though the significance of the
City ofEl Segundo–El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
February 20, 2023
Page 3 of 8
reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the
project site.
March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and
Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling.
Workforce requirements promote the development of skilled trades that yield
sustainable economic development. As the California Workforce Development Board
and the University of California, Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education
concluded:
\[L\]abor should be considered an investment rather than a cost—and
investments in growing, diversifying, and upskilling California’s workforce
can positively affect returns on climate mitigation efforts. In other words,
well-trained workers are key to delivering emissions reductions and
1
moving California closer to its climate targets.
Furthermore, workforce policies have significant environmental benefits given that
they improve an area’s jobs-housing balance, decreasing the amount and length of job
commutes and the associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In fact, on May 7,
2021, the South Coast Air Quality Management District found that that the “\[u\]se of a
2
local state-certified apprenticeship program” can result in air pollutant reductions.
Locating jobs closer to residential areas can have significant environmental benefits.
As the California Planning Roundtable noted in 2008:
People who live and work in the same jurisdiction would be more likely
to take transit, walk, or bicycle to work than residents of less balanced
communities and their vehicle trips would be shorter. Benefits would
1
California Workforce Development Board (2020) Putting California on the High Road: A
Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 at p. ii, available at https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/
wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Putting-California-on-the-High-Road.pdf.
2
South Coast Air Quality Management District (May 7, 2021) Certify Final Environmental
Assessment and Adopt Proposed Rule 2305 – Warehouse Indirect Source Rule –
Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions Program, and Proposed Rule
316 – Fees for Rule 2305, Submit Rule 2305 for Inclusion Into the SIP, and Approve
Supporting Budget Actions, available at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/Agendas/Governing-Board/2021/2021-May7-027.pdf?sfvrsn=10.
City ofEl Segundo–El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
February 20, 2023
Page 4 of 8
include potential reductions in both vehicle miles traveled and vehicle
3
hours traveled.
Moreover, local hire mandates and skill-training are critical facets of a strategy to
reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT). As planning experts Robert Cervero and
Michael Duncan have noted, simply placing jobs near housing stock is insufficient to
achieve VMT reductions given that the skill requirements of available local jobs must
4
match those held by local residents.
Some municipalities have even tied local hire and
other workforce policies to local development permits to address transportation
issues. Cervero and Duncan note that:
In nearly built-out Berkeley, CA, the approach to balancing jobs and
housing is to create local jobs rather than to develop new housing. The
city’s First Source program encourages businesses to hire local residents,
especially for entry- and intermediate-level jobs, and sponsors vocational
training to ensure residents are employment-ready. While the program is
voluntary, some 300 businesses have used it to date, placing more than
3,000 city residents in local jobs since it was launched in 1986. When
needed, these carrots are matched by sticks, since the city is not shy about
negotiating corporate participation in First Source as a condition of
approval for development permits.
Recently, the State of California verified its commitment towards workforce
development through the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022,
otherwise known as Assembly Bill No. 2011 (“AB2011”). AB2011 amended the
Planning and Zoning Law to allow ministerial, by-right approval for projects being
built alongside commercial corridors that meet affordability and labor requirements.
The City should consider utilizing local workforce policies and requirements to
benefit the local area economically and to mitigate greenhouse gas, improve air
quality, and reduce transportation impacts.
3
California Planning Roundtable (2008) Deconstructing Jobs-Housing Balance at p. 6,
available at https://cproundtable.org/static/media/uploads/publications/cpr-jobs-
housing.pdf
4
Cervero, Robert and Duncan, Michael (2006) Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs-
Housing Balance or Retail-Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association
72 (4), 475-490, 482, available at http://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/UTCT-
825.pdf.
City ofEl Segundo–El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
February 20, 2023
Page 5 of 8
II. THE CITY SHOULD IMPOSE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR
THE PROJECT’S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO PREVENT
COMMUNITY SPREAD OF COVID-19 AND OTHER INFECTIOUS
DISEASES
Construction work has been defined as a Lower to High-risk activity for COVID-19
spread by the Occupations Safety and Health Administration. Recently, several
construction sites have been identified as sources of community spread of COVID-
5
19.
Southwest Carpenters recommend that the Lead Agency adopt additional requirements
to mitigate public health risks from the Project’s construction activities. Southwest
Carpenters requests that the Lead Agency require safe on-site construction work
practices as well as training and certification for any construction workers on the
Project Site.
In particular, based upon Southwest Carpenters’ experience with safe construction site
work practices, Southwest Carpenters recommends that the Lead Agency require that
while construction activities are being conducted at the Project Site:
Construction Site Design:
• The Project Site will be limited to two controlled entry
points.
• Entry points will have temperature screening technicians
taking temperature readings when the entry point is open.
• The Temperature Screening Site Plan shows details
regarding access to the Project Site and Project Site logistics
for conducting temperature screening.
• A 48-hour advance notice will be provided to all trades prior
to the first day of temperature screening.
• The perimeter fence directly adjacent to the entry points will
be clearly marked indicating the appropriate 6-foot social
5
Santa Clara County Public Health (June 12, 2020) COVID-19 CASES AT
CONSTRUCTION SITES HIGHLIGHT NEED FOR CONTINUED VIGILANCE IN
SECTORS THAT HAVE REOPENED, available at https://www.sccgov.org/sites/
covid19/Pages/press-release-06-12-2020-cases-at-construction-sites.aspx.
City ofEl Segundo–El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
February 20, 2023
Page 6 of 8
distancing position for when you approach the screening
area. Please reference the Apex temperature screening site
map for additional details.
• There will be clear signage posted at the project site directing
you through temperature screening.
• Provide hand washing stations throughout the construction
site.
Testing Procedures:
• The temperature screening being used are non-contact
devices.
• Temperature readings will not be recorded.
• Personnel will be screened upon entering the testing center
and should only take 1-2 seconds per individual.
• Hard hats, head coverings, sweat, dirt, sunscreen or any
other cosmetics must be removed on the forehead before
temperature screening.
• Anyone who refuses to submit to a temperature screening or
does not answer the health screening questions will be
refused access to the Project Site.
• Screening will be performed at both entrances from 5:30 am
to 7:30 am.; main gate \[ZONE 1\] and personnel gate
\[ZONE 2\]
• After 7:30 am only the main gate entrance \[ZONE 1\] will
continue to be used for temperature testing for anybody
gaining entry to the project site such as returning personnel,
deliveries, and visitors.
• If the digital thermometer displays a temperature reading
above 100.0 degrees Fahrenheit, a second reading will be
taken to verify an accurate reading.
• If the second reading confirms an elevated temperature,
DHS will instruct the individual that he/she will not be
City ofEl Segundo–El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
February 20, 2023
Page 7 of 8
allowed to enter the Project Site. DHS will also instruct the
individual to promptly notify his/her supervisor and his/her
human resources (HR) representative and provide them with
a copy of Annex A.
Planning
• Require the development of an Infectious Disease
Preparedness and Response Plan that will include basic
infection prevention measures (requiring the use of personal
protection equipment), policies and procedures for prompt
identification and isolation of sick individuals, social
distancing (prohibiting gatherings of no more than 10
people including all-hands meetings and all-hands lunches)
communication and training and workplace controls that
meet standards that may be promulgated by the Center for
Disease Control, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Cal/OSHA, California Department of
6
Public Health or applicable local public health agencies.
The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Carpenters International Training Fund
has developed COVID-19 Training and Certification to ensure that Carpenter union
members and apprentices conduct safe work practices. The Agency should require that
all construction workers undergo COVID-19 Training and Certification before being
allowed to conduct construction activities at the Project Site.
Southwest Carpenters has also developed a rigorous Infection Control Risk
Assessment (“ICRA”) training program to ensure it delivers a workforce that
understands how to identify and control infection risks by implementing protocols to
6
See also The Center for Construction Research and Training, North America’s Building
Trades Unions (April 27 2020) NABTU and CPWR COVIC-19 Standards for U.S
Constructions Sites, available at https://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/NABTU_
CPWR_Standards_COVID-19.pdf; Los Angeles County Department of Public Works
(2020) Guidelines for Construction Sites During COVID-19 Pandemic, available at
https://dpw.lacounty.gov/building-and-safety/docs/pw_guidelines-construction-sites.pdf.
City ofEl Segundo – El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
February 20, 2023
Page 8 of 8
protect themselves and all others during renovation and construction projects in
7
healthcare environments.
ICRA protocols are intended to contain pathogens, control airflow, and protect
patients during the construction, maintenance and renovation of healthcare facilities.
ICRA protocols prevent cross contamination, minimizing the risk of secondary
infections in patients at hospital facilities.
The City should require the Project to be built using a workforce trained in ICRA
protocols.
Sincerely,
Jason A. Cohen, Esq.
Attorneys for Southwest Regional
Council of Carpenters
Attached:
March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and
Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling (Exhibit A);
Air Quality and GHG Expert Paul Rosenfeld CV (Exhibit B); and
Air Quality and GHG Expert Matt Hagemann CV (Exhibit C).
7
For details concerning Southwest Carpenters’s ICRA training program, see
https://icrahealthcare.com/.
EXHIBIT A
th
2656 29 Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
mhagemann@swape.com
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
prosenfeld@swape.com
March 8, 2021
Mitchell M. Tsai
155 South El Molino, Suite 104
Pasadena, CA 91101
Subject: Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling
Dear Mr. Tsai,
Soil llowing draft technical report
explaining the significance of worker trips required for construction of land use development projects with
respect to the estimation of
local hire requirements to reduce the length of worker trips, and consequently, reduced or mitigate the
potential GHG impacts.
Worker Trips and Greenhouse Gas Calculations
The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod is a statewide land use emissions computer model
designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental
professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with both
1
construction and operations from a variety of land use projects CalEEMod quantifies construction-related
emissions associated with land use projects resulting from off-road construction equipment; on-road mobile
equipment associated with workers, vendors, and hauling; fugitive dust associated with grading, demolition,
truck loading, and on-road vehicles traveling along paved and unpaved roads; and architectural coating
2
activities; and paving.
The number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CalEEMod to calculate emissions associated
3
with the on-road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.
1
California Emissions Estimator ModelCAPCOA, 2017 Ͳ ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/home.
2
California Emissions Estimator ModelCAPCOA, 2017 Ͳ ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/home.
3
ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34.
1
Specifically, the number and
associated with construction. Then, utilizing vehicle-class specific EMFAC 2014 emission factors, CalEEMod
calculates the vehicle exhaust, evaporative, and dust emissions resulting from construction-related VMT,
4
including personal vehicles for worker commuting.
Specifically, in order to calculate VMT, CalEEMod multiplies the average daily trip rate by the average overall trip
length (see excerpt below):
Daily Trip Rate * Average Overall Trip Length )
diin
Where:
5
Furthermore, to calculate the on-road emissions associated with worker trips, CalEEMod utilizes the following
equation (see excerpt below):
Emissions = VMT * EF
pollutantrunning,pollutant
Where:
Emissions = emissions from vehicle running for each pollutant
pollutant
VMT = vehicle miles traveled
6
EF = emission factor for running emissions.
running,pollutant
Thus, there is a direct relationship between trip length and VMT, as well as a direct relationship between VMT
and vehicle running emissions. In other words, when the trip length is increased, the VMT and vehicle running
emissions increase as a result. Thus, vehicle running emissions can be reduced by decreasing the average overall
trip length, by way of a local hire requirement or otherwise.
Default Worker Trip Parameters and Potential Local Hire Requirements
As previously discussed, the number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CalEEMod to
calculate emissions associated with the on-road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the
7
Project site during construction. In order to understand how local hire requirements and associated worker trip
length reductions impact GHG emissions calculations, it is important to consider the CalEEMod default worker
trip parameters. CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as
land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project
type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project-
specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act
8
substantial evidence. The default number of construction-related worker trips is calculated by multiplying the
4
ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14-15.
5
ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 23.
6
ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15.
7
ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34.
8
CalEEMod User Guide, ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 1, 9.
2
number of pieces of equipment for all phases by 1.25, with the exception of worker trips required for the
9
building construction and architectural coating phases. Furthermore, the worker trip vehicle class is a 50/25/25
10
percent mix of light duty autos, light duty truck class 1 and light duty truck class 2, respectively Finally, the
11
default worker trip length is consistent with the length of the operational home-to-work vehicle trips. The
operational home-to-work vehicle trip lengths are:
ƌƚĭğƷźƚƓ and ǒƩĬğƓźǩğƷźƚƓ selected on the project characteristic screen. These values
were ƭǒƦƦƌźĻķ ĬǤ ƷŷĻ ğźƩ ķźƭƷƩźĭƷƭ ƚƩ ǒƭĻ ğ ķĻŅğǒƌƷ ğǝĻƩğŭĻ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ ƭƷğƷĻ. Each district (or county) also
12
Thus, the default worker trip length is based on the location and urbanization level selected by the User when
modeling emissions. The below table shows the CalEEMod default rural and urban worker trip lengths by air
13
basin (see excerpt below and Attachment A).
7®±ª¤± 4±¨¯ ,¤¦³§ ¡¸ !¨± " ²¨
!¨± " ²¨ 2´± « Ȩ¬¨«¤²ȩ 5±¡ Ȩ¬¨«¤²ȩ
Great Basin Valleys 16.8 10.8
Lake County 16.8 10.8
Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8
Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Mountain Counties 16.8 10.8
North Central Coast 17.1 12.3
North Coast 16.8 10.8
Northeast Plateau 16.8 10.8
Sacramento Valley 16.8 10.8
Salton Sea 14.6 11
San Diego 16.8 10.8
San Francisco Bay Area 10.8 10.8
San Joaquin Valley 16.8 10.8
South Central Coast 16.8 10.8
South Coast 19.8 14.7
Average 16.47 11.17
Minimum 10.80 10.80
Maximum 19.80 14.70
Range 9.00 3.90
9
ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34.
10
ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15.
11
ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14.
12
ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 21.
13
ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/05_appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-84 D-86.
3
As demonstrated above, default rural worker trip lengths for air basins in California vary from 10.8- to 19.8-
miles, with an average of 16.47 miles. Furthermore, default urban worker trip lengths vary from 10.8- to 14.7-
miles, with an average of 11.17 miles. Thus, while default worker trip lengths vary by location, default urban
worker trip lengths tend to be shorter in length. Based on these trends evident in the CalEEMod default worker
trip lengths, we can reasonably assume that the efficacy of a local hire requirement is especially dependent
upon the urbanization of the project site, as well as the project location.
Practical Application of a Local Hire Requirement and Associated Impact
To provide an example of the potential impact of a local hire provision on construction-related GHG emissions,
we estimated the significance of a local hire provision for the Village South Specific Plan
. The Project proposed to construct 1,000 residential units, 100,000-SF of retail
space, 45,000-SF of office space, as well as a 50-room hotel, on the 24-acre site. The Project location is classified
as Urban and lies within the Los Angeles-South Coast County. As a result, the Project has a default worker trip
14
length of 14.7 miles. In an effort to evaluate the potential for
construction-related GHG emissions, we prepared an updated model, reducing all worker trip lengths to 10
miles (see Attachment B). Our analysis estimates that if a local hire provision with a 10-mile radius were to be
implemented, the GHG emissions associated with Project construction would decrease by approximately 17%
(see table below and Attachment C).
Local Hire Provision Net Change
Without Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT COe) 3,623
2
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT COe/year) 120.77
2
With Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,024
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT COe/year) 100.80
2
і 5ĻĭƩĻğƭĻ źƓ /ƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷźƚƓΏƩĻƌğƷĻķ DID 9ƒźƭƭźƚƓƭ ЊАі
As demonstrated above, by implementing a local hire provision requiring 10 mile worker trip lengths, the Project
could reduce potential GHG emissions associated with construction worker trips. More broadly, any local hire
requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a
reduction of construction-related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on
the location and urbanization level of the project site.
This serves as an example of the potential impacts of local hire requirements on estimated project-level GHG
emissions, though it does not indicate that local hire requirements would result in reduced construction-related
GHG emission for all projects. As previously described, the significance of a local hire requirement depends on
the worker trip length enfor
location.
14
ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ ğƷʹ http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/05_appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-85.
4
Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we
retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional
services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar
circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of
service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and
protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which
were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain
informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of
information obtained or provided by third parties.
Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
5
Rural H-W Urban H-W
Location TypeLocation Name
(miles)(miles)
Air Basin
Great Basin 16.810.8
Air Basin
Lake County16.810.8
Air Basin
Lake Tahoe16.810.8
Mojave Desert16.810.8
Air Basin
Mountain 16.810.8
Air Basin
North Central 17.112.3
Air Basin
North Coast16.810.8
Air Basin
Northeast 16.810.8
Air Basin
Sacramento 16.810.8
Air Basin
Salton Sea14.611
Air Basin
San Diego16.810.8
Air Basin
San Francisco 10.810.8
Air Basin
San Joaquin 16.810.8
Air Basin
South Central 16.810.8
Air Basin
South Coast19.814.7
Air Basin
Amador County 16.810.8
Air District
Antelope Valley 16.810.8
Air District
Bay Area AQMD10.810.8
Air District
Butte County 12.5412.54
Air District
Calaveras 16.810.8
Air District
Colusa County 16.810.8
Air District
El Dorado 16.810.8
Air District
Feather River 16.810.8
Air District
Glenn County 16.810.8
Air District
Great Basin 16.810.8
Air District
Imperial County 10.27.3
Air District
Kern County 16.810.8
Air District
Lake County 16.810.8
Air District
Lassen County 16.810.8
Air District
Mariposa 16.810.8
Air District
Mendocino 16.810.8
Air District
Modoc County 16.810.8
Air District
Mojave Desert 16.810.8
Air District
Monterey Bay 16.810.8
Air District
North Coast 16.810.8
Air District
Northern Sierra 16.810.8
Air District
Northern 16.810.8
Air District
Placer County 16.810.8
Air District
Sacramento 1510
Air District
San Diego 16.810.8
Air District
San Joaquin 16.810.8
Air District
San Luis Obispo 1313
Air District
Santa Barbara 8.38.3
Air District
Shasta County 16.810.8
Air District
Air DistrictSiskiyou County 16.810.8
Air DistrictSouth Coast 19.814.7
Air District
Tehama County 16.810.8
Air District
Tuolumne 16.810.8
Air District
Ventura County 16.810.8
Air District
Yolo/Solano 1510
County
Alameda 10.810.8
County
Alpine 16.810.8
County
Amador 16.810.8
County
Butte 12.5412.54
County
Calaveras 16.810.8
County
Colusa 16.810.8
County
Contra Costa 10.810.8
County
Del Norte 16.810.8
County
El Dorado-Lake 16.810.8
County
El Dorado-16.810.8
County
Fresno 16.810.8
County
Glenn 16.810.8
County
Humboldt 16.810.8
County
Imperial 10.27.3
County
Inyo 16.810.8
County
Kern-Mojave 16.810.8
County
Kern-San 16.810.8
County
Kings 16.810.8
County
Lake 16.810.8
County
Lassen 16.810.8
County
Los Angeles-16.810.8
County
Los Angeles-19.814.7
County
Madera 16.810.8
County
Marin 10.810.8
County
Mariposa 16.810.8
County
Mendocino-16.810.8
County
Mendocino-16.810.8
County
Mendocino-16.810.8
County
Mendocino-16.810.8
County
Merced 16.810.8
County
Modoc 16.810.8
County
Mono 16.810.8
County
Monterey 16.810.8
County
Napa 10.810.8
County
Nevada 16.810.8
County
Orange 19.814.7
County
Placer-Lake 16.810.8
County
Placer-Mountain 16.810.8
CountyPlacer-16.810.8
Plumas16.810.8
County
County
Riverside-16.810.8
Riverside-19.814.7
County
Riverside-Salton 14.611
County
Riverside-South 19.814.7
County
Sacramento1510
County
San Benito16.810.8
County
San Bernardino-16.810.8
County
San Bernardino-19.814.7
County
San Diego16.810.8
County
San Francisco10.810.8
County
San Joaquin16.810.8
County
San Luis Obispo1313
County
San Mateo10.810.8
County
Santa Barbara-8.38.3
County
Santa Barbara-8.38.3
County
Santa Clara10.810.8
County
Santa Cruz16.810.8
County
Shasta16.810.8
County
Sierra16.810.8
County
Siskiyou16.810.8
County
Solano-1510
County
Solano-San 16.810.8
County
Sonoma-North 16.810.8
County
Sonoma-San 10.810.8
County
Stanislaus16.810.8
County
Sutter16.810.8
County
Tehama16.810.8
County
Trinity16.810.8
County
Tulare16.810.8
County
Tuolumne16.810.8
County
Ventura16.810.8
County
Yolo1510
County
Yuba16.810.8
County
Statewide16.810.8
Statewide
7®±ª¤± 4±¨¯ ,¤¦³§ ¡¸ !¨± " ²¨
!¨± " ²¨2´± « Ȩ¬¨«¤²ȩ5±¡ Ȩ¬¨«¤²ȩ
Great Basin Valleys16.810.8
Lake County16.810.8
Lake Tahoe16.810.8
Mojave Desert16.810.8
Mountain Counties16.810.8
North Central Coast17.112.3
North Coast16.810.8
Northeast Plateau16.810.8
Sacramento Valley16.810.8
Salton Sea14.611
San Diego16.810.8
San Francisco Bay Area10.810.8
San Joaquin Valley16.810.8
South Central Coast16.810.8
South Coast19.814.7
Average16.4711.17
Mininum10.8010.80
Maximum19.8014.70
Range9.003.90
00000
72
2789
Population
8,000.00
45,000.0036,000.0072,600.0025,000.0056,000.00
975,000.00
Floor Surface Area
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
332028
1.030.831.670.181.561.29
25.66
0.006
Lot Acreage
Precipitation Freq (Days)Operational YearN2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
MetricRoom
1000sqft1000sqft1000sqft1000sqft
Dwelling UnitDwelling Unit
Page 1 of 44
0.029
2.2
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Size8.00
45.0036.0050.0025.0056.00
975.00
Wind Speed (m/s)CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Urban9Southern California Edison702.44
Hotel
Land Uses
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
Regional Shopping Center
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage1.2 Other Project Characteristics UrbanizationClimate ZoneUtility CompanyCO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.000.000.000.006.173.871.393.756.164.180.69
79.8263.9910.7478.27
New Value
1.257.166.392.468.196.075.861.05
48.7594.3649.97
158.37131.84
1,019.201,019.20
Default Value
Page 2 of 44
ST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TR
SU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TR
NumberWoodNumberWood
Column Name
FireplaceWoodMassFireplaceWoodMass
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Table Name
tblFireplacestblFireplacestblFireplacestblFireplaces
tblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTrips
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual
construction phase lengths.Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See
SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.Energy
Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.Water
Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
3.206.395.834.136.413.849.430.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
57.6565.8062.64
5.956.596.658.171.251.25
72.1625.2411.0389.9542.7048.7548.7525.0025.00
127.15999.60999.60
Page 3 of 44
SU_TRSU_TRSU_TR
WD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TR
NumberCatalyticNumberCatalytic
WoodstoveDayYearWoodstoveDayYear
NumberNoncatalyticNumberNoncatalytic
WoodstoveWoodMassWoodstoveWoodMass
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
tblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodsto
vestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstoves
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.0 Emissions Summary
757
CO2e
53.1082
214.6993
1,724.9181,630.4921,724.918
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
003
CH4
0.06010.12940.11850.1294
8.0200e-
MT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
656
52.9078
213.1969
1,721.6821,627.5291,721.682
Total CO2
656
52.9078
213.1969
1,721.6821,627.5291,721.682
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Total
0.25490.45880.41380.01470.4588
PM2.5
003
PM2.5
0.07540.11280.09350.1128
Exhaust
6.0400e-
003
PM2.5
0.17950.34600.32030.3460
Fugitive
8.6300e-
Page 4 of 44
Total
PM10
0.49861.42591.29590.03901.4259
003
PM10
0.08170.12010.09960.1201
Exhaust6.4700e-
tons/yr
PM10
0.41691.30581.19630.03251.3058
Fugitive
003004
SO2
0.01890.01780.0189
2.4000e-5.9000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CO
1.16626.16255.67470.28106.1625
NOx
1.82424.11423.36490.13354.1142
ROG
0.17130.69040.61484.16194.1619
Year
2021202220232024
Maximum
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction
313
CO2e
0.00
53.1082
CO2e
214.6991
1,724.9181,630.4921,724.918
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
N20
0.00
003
CH4
0.06010.12940.11850.1294
CH40.00
8.0200e-
MT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
313
0.00
52.9077
213.1967
1,721.6821,627.5291,721.682
Total CO2
Total CO2
313
0.00
1.41031.36131.19851.19211.19181.07741.03201.0260
52.9077
213.1967
1,721.6821,627.5291,721.682
NBio- CO2
NBio-CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
0.00
Bio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Total
0.25490.45880.41380.01470.45880.00
PM2.5
Total
PM2.5
003
0.00
PM2.5
0.07540.11280.09350.1128
PM2.5
Exhaust
6.0400e-
Exhaust
003
0.00
PM2.5
0.17950.34600.32030.3460
PM2.5
Fugitive
8.6300e-
Fugitive
Page 5 of 44
Total
0.00
PM10
0.49861.42591.29590.03901.4259Total
1.41031.36131.19851.19211.19181.07741.03201.0260
PM10
003
0.00
PM10
0.08170.12010.09960.1201
PM10
Exhaust6.4700e-
Exhaust
tons/yr
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
0.00
PM10
0.41691.30581.19630.03251.3058
PM10
Fugitive
Fugitive
003004
SO2
0.00
SO2
0.01890.01780.0189
2.4000e-5.9000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
End Date
2-28-20225-31-20228-31-20222-28-20235-31-20238-31-2023
11-30-202111-30-2022
CO
CO
0.00
1.16626.16255.67470.28106.1625
NOx
0.00
NOx
1.82424.11423.36480.13354.1142
9-1-20213-1-20226-1-20229-1-20223-1-20236-1-2023
12-1-202112-1-2022
Start Date
ROG
0.00
ROG
0.17130.69040.61484.16194.1619
12345678
Quarter
Year
2021202220232024
Percent
Maximum
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.1 Overall Construction Mitigated Construction
32
51
CO2e
222.5835514.8354683.7567
3,913.2837,629.01612,963.47
003
N2O
0.04680.00000.00000.07550.1260
3.7400e-
CH4
0.02010.13030.34073.0183
12.281115.7904
MT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
26
19
220.9670207.8079585.8052
3,896.0737,620.49812,531.15
Total CO2
26
07
0.0000
1.02652.88571.62072.8857
220.9670556.6420
3,896.0737,620.49812,294.18
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.0000
29.1632
Bio- CO2
207.8079236.9712
Total
0.07140.09662.14340.00000.00002.3114
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.07140.09660.05390.00000.00000.2219
Exhaust
PM2.5
2.08952.0895
Fugitive
Page 6 of 44
Total
PM10
0.07140.09667.85590.00000.00008.0240
1.02652.88571.62072.8857
PM10
0.07140.09660.05800.00000.00000.2260
Exhaust
tons/yr
PM10
7.79797.7979
Fugitive
003003
SO2
0.08210.0914
1.6700e-7.6200e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Highest
2-29-20245-31-2024
11-30-2023
CO
0.7770
10.380419.183430.3407
NOx
0.29501.23127.99629.5223
9-1-20233-1-2024
12-1-2023
ROG
5.14370.13981.58576.8692
9
1011
Area
Total
Water
Waste
Mobile
Energy
Category
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational
0.00
CO2e
32
51
CO2e
222.5835514.8354683.7567
3,913.2837,629.01612,963.47
N20
0.00
003
N2O
0.04680.00000.00000.07550.1260
3.7400e-
0.00
CH4
CH4
0.02010.13030.34073.0183
12.281115.7904
MT/yr
0.00
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Total CO2
26
19
220.9670207.8079585.8052
3,896.0737,620.49812,531.15
Total CO2
0.00
NBio-CO2
26
07
0.0000
220.9670556.6420
3,896.0737,620.49812,294.18
NBio- CO2
0.00
Bio- CO2
0.00000.00000.0000
29.1632
Bio- CO2
207.8079236.9712
0.00
Total
PM2.5
Total
0.07140.09662.14340.00000.00002.3114
PM2.5
0.00
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
0.07140.09660.05390.00000.00000.2219
Exhaust
0.00
PM2.5
Fugitive
PM2.5
2.08952.0895
Fugitive
Page 7 of 44
0.00
Total
PM10
Total
PM10
0.07140.09667.85590.00000.00008.0240
0.00
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.07140.09660.05800.00000.00000.2260
Exhaust
0.00
PM10
tons/yr
Fugitive
PM10
7.79797.7979
Fugitive
0.00
SO2
003003
SO2
0.08210.0914
1.6700e-7.6200e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CO
0.00
CO
0.7770
10.380419.183430.3407
0.00
NOx
NOx
0.29501.23127.99629.5223
0.00
ROG
ROG
5.14370.13981.58576.8692
Area
Total
Water
Waste
Mobile
Energy
Percent
Category
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Phase Description
3020453535
500
Num Days
555555
Week
Num Days
End Date
10/12/202111/9/20211/11/202212/12/20231/30/20243/19/2024
Page 8 of 44
Start Date
9/1/202110/13/202111/10/20211/12/202212/13/20231/31/2024
Phase Type
sqft)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
Phase Name
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Phase
Number
123456 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped
Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5Acres of Paving: 0OffRoad Equipment
0.730.380.400.400.370.380.410.400.480.370.290.200.740.370.450.420.360.380.48
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Load Factor
819797898497468078
158247247158187247367231130132
Horse Power
8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.007.008.008.007.008.008.008.008.006.00
Usage Hours
1323421122131312221
Page 9 of 44
Amount
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Offroad Equipment Type
Concrete/Industrial SawsExcavatorsRubber Tired DozersRubber Tired DozersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesExcavatorsGradersRubber Tired DozersScrapersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesCranesForkliftsGenerator
SetsTractors/Loaders/BackhoesWeldersPaversPaving EquipmentRollersAir Compressors
Phase Name
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
DemolitionDemolitionDemolitionSite PreparationSite PreparationGradingGradingGradingGradingGradingBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding
ConstructionPavingPavingPavingArchitectural Coating Trips and VMT
CO2e
0.0000
51.360151.3601
Hauling
N2O
Vehicle Class
HHDTHHDTHHDTHHDTHHDTHHDT
0.00000.00000.0000
CH4
0.00000.01440.0144
Vendor
Vehicle Class
HDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_Mix
MT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.0000
51.001251.0012
Total CO2
Class
0.0000
51.001251.0012
Worker Vehicle
NBio- CO2
LD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_Mix
20.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.00
0.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Length
Hauling Trip
003
Total
0.02160.0291
PM2.5
6.906.906.906.906.906.90
7.5100e-
Length
Vendor Trip
PM2.5
0.00000.02160.0216
Exhaust
14.7014.7014.7014.7014.7014.70
003003
PM2.5
Length
Fugitive
7.5100e-7.5100e-
Worker Trip
Page 10 of 44
0.000.000.000.000.00
Total
PM10
0.04960.02330.0729
458.00
Number
Hauling Trip
PM10
0.00000.02330.0233
Exhaust
0.000.000.000.000.00
143.00
tons/yr
Number
PM10
0.04960.0496
Vendor Trip
Fugitive
15.0018.0020.0015.00
801.00160.00
004004
SO2
5.8000e-5.8000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Number
Worker Trip
678961
CO
0.32350.3235
NOx
Count
0.47160.4716
Offroad Equipment
ROG
0.04750.0475
Total
Phase Name
CategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00002.22670.0000
17.486919.713651.360051.3600
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
003005003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.01440.0144
1.2100e-7.0000e-1.2800e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00002.22510.0000
17.456619.681651.001151.0011
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00002.22510.0000
17.456619.681651.001151.0011
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
003004003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.02160.0291
PM2.5PM2.5
1.2600e-6.7000e-1.9300e-7.5100e-
004005004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.02160.0216
ExhaustExhaust
1.8000e-2.0000e-2.0000e-
003004003003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.0000
FugitiveFugitive
1.0800e-6.5000e-1.7300e-7.5100e-7.5100e-
Page 11 of 44
003003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.04960.02330.0729
4.1300e-2.4900e-6.6200e-
004005004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.02330.0233
ExhaustExhaust
1.9000e-2.0000e-2.1000e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.04960.0496
FugitiveFugitive
3.9400e-2.4700e-6.4100e-
004005004004004
SO2SO2
0.0000
1.8000e-2.0000e-2.0000e-5.8000e-5.8000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003
0.01480.00000.02330.32350.3235
8.5100e-
004
NOxNOx
0.06340.00000.06410.47160.4716
7.5000e-
003004003
ROGROG
0.00000.04750.0475
1.9300e-9.7000e-2.9000e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00002.22670.0000
17.486919.713633.706133.7061
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
003005003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.01080.0108
1.2100e-7.0000e-1.2800e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00002.22510.0000
17.456619.681633.435733.4357
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00002.22510.0000
17.456619.681633.435733.4357
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
003004003
TotalTotal
0.00000.09930.01880.1181
PM2.5PM2.5
1.2600e-6.7000e-1.9300e-
004005004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.01880.0188
ExhaustExhaust
1.8000e-2.0000e-2.0000e-
003004003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.09930.0993
FugitiveFugitive
1.0800e-6.5000e-1.7300e-
Page 12 of 44
003003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.18070.02040.2011
4.1300e-2.4900e-6.6200e-
004005004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.02040.0204
ExhaustExhaust
1.9000e-2.0000e-2.1000e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.18070.1807
FugitiveFugitive
3.9400e-2.4700e-6.4100e-
004005004004004
SO2SO2
0.0000
1.8000e-2.0000e-2.0000e-3.8000e-3.8000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003
0.01480.00000.02330.21150.2115
8.5100e-
004
NOxNOx
0.06340.00000.06410.40500.4050
7.5000e-
003004003
ROGROG
0.00000.03890.0389
1.9300e-9.7000e-2.9000e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00001.78141.78140.0000
33.706033.7060
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.00000.01080.0108
5.0000e-5.0000e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.00001.78011.78010.0000
33.435733.4357
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00001.78011.78010.0000
33.435733.4357
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.09930.01880.1181
PM2.5PM2.5
5.4000e-5.4000e-
005005
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.01880.0188
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.09930.0993
FugitiveFugitive
5.2000e-5.2000e-
Page 13 of 44
003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.18070.02040.2011
1.9900e-1.9900e-
005005
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.02040.0204
ExhaustExhaust
2.0000e-2.0000e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.18070.1807
FugitiveFugitive
1.9700e-1.9700e-
005005004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
2.0000e-2.0000e-3.8000e-3.8000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.21150.2115
6.8100e-6.8100e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.40500.4050
6.0000e-6.0000e-
004004
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.03890.0389
7.7000e-7.7000e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00001.78141.78140.0000
104.3776104.3776
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.00000.03350.0335
5.0000e-5.0000e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.00001.78011.78010.0000
103.5405103.5405
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00001.78011.78010.0000
103.5405103.5405
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.06930.03470.1040
PM2.5PM2.5
5.4000e-5.4000e-
005005
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.03470.0347
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.06930.0693
FugitiveFugitive
5.2000e-5.2000e-
Page 14 of 44
003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.17410.03770.2118
1.9900e-1.9900e-
005005
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.03770.0377
ExhaustExhaust
2.0000e-2.0000e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.17410.1741
FugitiveFugitive
1.9700e-1.9700e-
005005003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
2.0000e-2.0000e-1.1800e-1.1800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.58670.5867
6.8100e-6.8100e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.88160.8816
6.0000e-6.0000e-
004004
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.07960.0796
7.7000e-7.7000e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00003.76073.76070.0000
104.3775104.3775
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
004004
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.00000.03350.0335
1.1000e-1.1000e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.00003.75793.75790.0000
103.5403103.5403
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00003.75793.75790.0000
103.5403103.5403
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.06930.03470.1040
PM2.5PM2.5
1.1400e-1.1400e-
005005
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.03470.0347
ExhaustExhaust
3.0000e-3.0000e-
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.06930.0693
FugitiveFugitive
1.1100e-1.1100e-
Page 15 of 44
003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.17410.03770.2118
4.2000e-4.2000e-
005005
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.03770.0377
ExhaustExhaust
3.0000e-3.0000e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.17410.1741
FugitiveFugitive
4.1600e-4.1600e-
005005003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
4.0000e-4.0000e-1.1800e-1.1800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.00000.01440.01440.58670.5867
003003
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.88160.8816
1.2700e-1.2700e-
003003
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.07960.0796
1.6400e-1.6400e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00003.76073.76070.0000
19.241419.2414
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
004004003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
1.1000e-1.1000e-6.1700e-6.1700e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.00003.75793.75790.0000
19.087119.0871
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00003.75793.75790.0000
19.087119.0871
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
003003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.01800.0233
PM2.5PM2.5
1.1400e-1.1400e-5.2600e-
005005003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
3.0000e-3.0000e-5.2600e-5.2600e-
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.01800.0180
FugitiveFugitive
1.1100e-1.1100e-
Page 16 of 44
003003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.08070.0865
4.2000e-4.2000e-5.7200e-
005005003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
3.0000e-3.0000e-5.7200e-5.7200e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.08070.0807
FugitiveFugitive
4.1600e-4.1600e-
005005004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
4.0000e-4.0000e-2.2000e-2.2000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.00000.01440.01440.10170.1017
003003
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.13600.1360
1.2700e-1.2700e-
003003
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.01270.0127
1.6400e-1.6400e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.66840.66840.0000
19.241419.2414
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
2.0000e-2.0000e-6.1700e-6.1700e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.00000.66790.66790.0000
19.087119.0871
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00000.66790.66790.0000
19.087119.0871
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.01800.0233
PM2.5PM2.5
2.1000e-2.1000e-5.2600e-
005005003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-5.2600e-5.2600e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.01800.0180
FugitiveFugitive
2.0000e-2.0000e-
Page 17 of 44
004004003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.08070.0865
7.7000e-7.7000e-5.7200e-
005005003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-5.7200e-5.7200e-
tons/yrtons/yr
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.08070.0807
FugitiveFugitive
7.7000e-7.7000e-
005005004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-2.2000e-2.2000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.10170.1017
2.4400e-2.4400e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.13600.1360
2.1000e-2.1000e-
004004
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.01270.0127
2.8000e-2.8000e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.66840.6684
294.8881294.8881
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.07020.0702
2.0000e-2.0000e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.00000.66790.6679
293.1324293.1324
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00000.66790.6679
293.1324293.1324
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.09630.0963
PM2.5PM2.5
2.1000e-2.1000e-
005005
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.09630.0963
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
2.0000e-2.0000e-
Page 18 of 44
004004
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.10230.1023
7.7000e-7.7000e-
005005
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.10230.1023
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-
tons/yrtons/yr
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
7.7000e-7.7000e-
005005003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-3.4100e-3.4100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00002.07002.0700
2.4400e-2.4400e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00001.97541.9754
2.1000e-2.1000e-
004004
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.21580.2158
2.8000e-2.8000e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
8
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
442.6435967.4773294.8877294.8877
1,410.120
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
CH4CH4
0.00000.02640.02660.05300.07020.0702
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
2
0.0000
441.9835966.8117293.1321293.1321
1,408.795
Total CO2Total CO2
2
0.0000
441.9835966.8117293.1321293.1321
1,408.795
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.03590.30310.33900.09630.0963
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.01120.09630.0963
ExhaustExhaust
3.0400e-8.1700e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.03290.29490.3278
FugitiveFugitive
Page 19 of 44
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.11711.11921.23630.10230.1023
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.01210.10230.1023
ExhaustExhaust
3.1800e-8.8700e-
tons/yrtons/yr
PM10PM10
0.00000.11401.11031.2243
FugitiveFugitive
003003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.01070.0152
4.5500e-3.4100e-3.4100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.45803.53053.98852.07002.0700
NOxNOx
0.00001.69610.30662.00271.97541.9754
ROGROG
0.00000.05270.40880.46160.21580.2158
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
8
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
442.6435967.4773287.9814287.9814
1,410.120
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
CH4CH4
0.00000.02640.02660.05300.06810.0681
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
2
0.0000
441.9835966.8117286.2789286.2789
1,408.795
Total CO2Total CO2
2
0.0000
441.9835966.8117286.2789286.2789
1,408.795
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.03590.30310.33900.08130.0813
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.01120.08130.0813
ExhaustExhaust
3.0400e-8.1700e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.03290.29490.3278
FugitiveFugitive
Page 20 of 44
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.11711.11921.23630.08640.0864
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.01210.08640.0864
ExhaustExhaust
3.1800e-8.8700e-
tons/yrtons/yr
PM10PM10
0.00000.11401.11031.2243
FugitiveFugitive
003003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.01070.0152
4.5500e-3.3300e-3.3300e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.45803.53053.98852.00612.0061
NOxNOx
0.00001.69610.30662.00271.77651.7765
ROGROG
0.00000.05270.40880.46160.19420.1942
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
6
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
418.5624909.9291287.9811287.9811
1,328.491
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
CH4CH4
0.00000.02280.02340.04620.06810.0681
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
9
0.0000
417.9930909.3439286.2785286.2785
1,327.336
Total CO2Total CO2
9
0.0000
417.9930909.3439286.2785286.2785
1,327.336
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.03350.29570.32920.08130.0813
PM2.5PM2.5
003003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.08130.0813
ExhaustExhaust
1.4000e-7.7400e-9.1400e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.03210.28790.3200
FugitiveFugitive
Page 21 of 44
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.11271.09241.20510.08640.0864
003003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.08640.0864
ExhaustExhaust
1.4600e-8.4100e-9.8700e-
tons/yrtons/yr
PM10PM10
0.00000.11131.08401.1953
FugitiveFugitive
003003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.01010.0144
4.3000e-3.3300e-3.3300e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.40113.16963.57072.00612.0061
NOxNOx
0.00001.25110.27081.52181.77651.7765
ROGROG
0.00000.03820.37530.41350.19420.1942
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
6
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
13.122713.1227
418.5624909.9291
1,328.491
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.02280.02340.04620.0000
4.2100e-4.2100e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
9
0.00000.0000
13.017513.0175
417.9930909.3439
1,327.336
Total CO2Total CO2
9
0.00000.0000
13.017513.0175
417.9930909.3439
1,327.336
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.03350.29570.32920.0000
PM2.5PM2.5
3.0500e-3.0500e-
003003003003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.4000e-7.7400e-9.1400e-3.0500e-3.0500e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.03210.28790.3200
FugitiveFugitive
Page 22 of 44
003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.11271.09241.20510.0000
3.3200e-3.3200e-
003003003003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.4600e-8.4100e-9.8700e-3.3200e-3.3200e-
tons/yrtons/yr
PM10PM10
0.00000.11131.08401.1953
FugitiveFugitive
003004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.01010.0144
4.3000e-1.5000e-1.5000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.40113.16963.57070.09480.0948
NOxNOx
0.00001.25110.27081.52180.06630.0663
003003
ROGROG
0.00000.03820.37530.41350.0000
6.7100e-6.7100e-
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.89680.89680.0000
13.122713.1227
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
2.0000e-2.0000e-4.2100e-4.2100e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.00000.89630.89630.0000
13.017513.0175
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00000.89630.89630.0000
13.017513.0175
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.0000
PM2.5PM2.5
2.9000e-2.9000e-3.0500e-3.0500e-
005005003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-3.0500e-3.0500e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
2.8000e-2.8000e-
Page 23 of 44
003003003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
1.0800e-1.0800e-3.3200e-3.3200e-
005005003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-3.3200e-3.3200e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
1.0700e-1.0700e-
005005004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-1.5000e-1.5000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.09480.0948
3.1200e-3.1200e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.06630.0663
2.7000e-2.7000e-
004004003003
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.0000
3.7000e-3.7000e-6.7100e-6.7100e-
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.89680.89680.0000
22.207322.2073
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
2.0000e-2.0000e-7.1200e-7.1200e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.00000.89630.89630.0000
22.029222.0292
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00000.89630.89630.0000
22.029222.0292
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.0000
PM2.5PM2.5
2.9000e-2.9000e-4.7400e-4.7400e-
005005003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-4.7400e-4.7400e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
2.8000e-2.8000e-
Page 24 of 44
003003003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
1.0800e-1.0800e-5.1500e-5.1500e-
005005003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-5.1500e-5.1500e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
1.0700e-1.0700e-
005005004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-2.5000e-2.5000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.16090.1609
3.1200e-3.1200e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.10480.1048
2.7000e-2.7000e-
004004
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.01090.00000.0109
3.7000e-3.7000e-
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00001.47061.47060.0000
22.207322.2073
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
4.0000e-4.0000e-7.1200e-7.1200e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.00001.46971.46970.0000
22.029222.0292
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00001.46971.46970.0000
22.029222.0292
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.0000
PM2.5PM2.5
4.9000e-4.9000e-4.7400e-4.7400e-
005005003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-4.7400e-4.7400e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
4.8000e-4.8000e-
Page 25 of 44
003003003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
1.8200e-1.8200e-5.1500e-5.1500e-
005005003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-5.1500e-5.1500e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
1.8100e-1.8100e-
005005004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
2.0000e-2.0000e-2.5000e-2.5000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.16090.1609
4.9200e-4.9200e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.10480.1048
4.1000e-4.1000e-
004004
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.01090.00000.0109
5.9000e-5.9000e-
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00001.47061.47060.00004.47454.4745
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005004004
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
4.0000e-4.0000e-2.5000e-2.5000e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.00001.46971.46970.00004.46824.4682
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00001.46971.46970.00004.46824.4682
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.0000
PM2.5PM2.5
4.9000e-4.9000e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
005005003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
4.8000e-4.8000e-
Page 26 of 44
003003003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
1.8200e-1.8200e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
005005003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
1.8100e-1.8100e-
005005005005
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
2.0000e-2.0000e-5.0000e-5.0000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.03170.0317
4.9200e-4.9200e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.02130.0213
4.1000e-4.1000e-
004004003
ROGROG
0.00000.00004.13724.1404
5.9000e-5.9000e-3.1600e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Archit. Coating
3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.00004.47454.4745
24.955824.9558
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
004004004004
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
6.1000e-6.1000e-2.5000e-2.5000e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.00000.00004.46824.4682
24.940724.9407
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00000.00004.46824.4682
24.940724.9407
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
003003003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.0000
PM2.5PM2.5
8.3700e-8.3700e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
004004003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
2.2000e-2.2000e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
8.1500e-8.1500e-
Page 27 of 44
003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.03090.03090.0000
1.0700e-1.0700e-
004004003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
2.3000e-2.3000e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
tons/yrtons/yr
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.03070.0307
FugitiveFugitive
004004005005
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
2.8000e-2.8000e-5.0000e-5.0000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.00000.08350.08350.03170.0317
003003
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.02130.0213
6.9900e-6.9900e-
003
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.01010.01014.13724.1404
3.1600e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Archit. Coating
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2e
0.00000.0000
24.955824.9558
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
004004
CH4
0.00000.0000
6.1000e-6.1000e-
MT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.0000
24.940724.9407
Total CO2
0.00000.0000
24.940724.9407
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
003003
Total
0.00000.0000
PM2.5
8.3700e-8.3700e-
004004
PM2.5
0.00000.0000
Exhaust
2.2000e-2.2000e-
003003
PM2.5
0.00000.0000
Fugitive
8.1500e-8.1500e-
Page 28 of 44
Total
PM10
0.00000.00000.03090.0309
004004
PM10
0.00000.0000
Exhaust
2.3000e-2.3000e-
tons/yr
PM10
0.00000.00000.03070.0307
Fugitive
004004
SO2
0.00000.0000
2.8000e-2.8000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CO
0.00000.00000.08350.0835
003003
NOx
0.00000.0000
6.9900e-6.9900e-
ROG
0.00000.00000.01010.0101
Total
VendorWorker
Hauling
Category
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
22
CO2e
7,629.0167,629.016
N2O
0.00000.0000
CH4
0.34070.3407
506,227706,812445,703707,488
Mitigated
3,413,9371,112,221
13,660,06520,552,452
Annual VMT
MT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
66
7,620.4987,620.498
Total CO2
66
7,620.4987,620.498
NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
506,227706,812445,703707,488
3,413,9371,112,221
13,660,06520,552,452
Unmitigated
Annual VMT
Total
2.14342.1434
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.05390.0539
Exhaust
31.05
154.00160.00461.20357.84
PM2.5
2.08952.0895
4075.502817.72
8,057.31
Fugitive
Page 29 of 44
Sunday
Total
PM10
7.85597.8559
62.55
154.25187.50511.92601.44
3,773.252,873.528,164.43
Saturday
PM10
0.05800.0580
Exhaust
tons/yr Average Daily Trip Rate
PM10
7.79797.7979
Fugitive
145.75288.45192.00501.12528.08
4,026.752,368.808,050.95
Weekday
SO2
0.08210.0821
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CO
19.183419.1834
NOx
7.99627.9962
Total
Hotel
Land Use
ROG
1.58571.5857
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
Regional Shopping Center
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
CategoryMitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Unmitigated
4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information
MH
0.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.000821
SBUS
0.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.000712
3344
434411
Pass-by
MCY
0.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.005285
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
11111920381835
UBUS
0.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.001817
Trip Purpose %
Diverted
OBUS
0.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.002613
86867737583854
Primary
HHD
0.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.033577
40.6040.6019.0019.0019.0019.0019.00
MHD
0.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.021166
H-O or C-NW
Trip %
LHD2
19.2019.2048.0072.5061.6069.0064.70
0.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.006332
H-S or C-C
Page 30 of 44
LHD1
0.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.014033
8.50
40.2040.2033.0019.4012.0016.30
H-W or C-W
MDV
0.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.116369
8.708.706.906.906.906.906.90
H-O or C-NW
LDT2
0.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.209971
5.905.908.408.408.408.408.40
Miles
H-S or C-C
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
LDT1
0.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.044216
14.7014.7016.6016.6016.6016.6016.60
LDA
0.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.543088
H-W or C-W
Hotel
Hotel
Land Use
Land Use
Restaurant)
Restaurant)
Quality Restaurant
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
General Office Building
High Turnover (Sit Down
High Turnover (Sit Down
Regional Shopping Center
Regional Shopping Center
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Historical Energy Use: N
4.4 Fleet Mix 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
6688
CO2e
2,521.6352,521.6351,391.6471,391.647
N2O
0.02150.02150.02540.0254
CH4
0.10370.10370.02650.0265
MT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
5577
2,512.6462,512.6461,383.4261,383.426
Total CO2
5577
2,512.6462,512.6461,383.4261,383.426
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Total
0.00000.00000.09660.0966
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.00000.00000.09660.0966
Exhaust
PM2.5
Fugitive
Page 31 of 44
Total
PM10
0.00000.00000.09660.0966
PM10
0.00000.00000.09660.0966
Exhaust
tons/yr
PM10
Fugitive
003003
SO2
7.6200e-7.6200e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CO
0.77700.7770
NOx
1.23121.2312
ROG
0.13980.1398
CategoryMitigatedMitigated
ElectricityElectricity
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
UnmitigatedNaturalGasNaturalGasUnmitigated
8
CO2e
4.9301
21.928425.146893.455799.0993
701.1408445.9468
1,391.647
004004003003003005
N2O
0.01280.0254
4.0000e-4.6000e-8.1300e-1.7000e-1.8100e-9.0000e-
004004003003003005
CH4
0.01340.0265
4.2000e-4.8000e-8.5000e-1.7800e-1.8900e-9.0000e-
MT/yr
8
4.9009
21.798824.998392.903698.5139
696.9989443.3124
1,383.426
Total CO2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
8
4.9009
21.798824.998392.903698.5139
696.9989443.3124
1,383.426
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
003003003003004
Total
0.04870.03100.0966
PM2.5
1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
003003003003004
PM2.5
0.04870.03100.0966
Exhaust1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
PM2.5
Fugitive
003003003003004
Total
PM10
0.04870.03100.0966
1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
Page 32 of 44
003003003003004
PM10
0.04870.03100.0966
Exhaust
1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
tons/yr
PM10
Fugitive
004003004003004004005003
SO2
1.2000e-3.8400e-1.4000e-2.4400e-5.1000e-5.4000e-3.0000e-7.6200e-
CO
003003
0.25610.01930.34210.07170.07600.7770
8.0100e-3.7800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
003
NOx
0.01880.60180.02300.40720.08530.09051.2312
4.5000e-
003003003003004
ROG
0.07040.04480.1398
2.2000e-2.5300e-9.3900e-9.9500e-5.0000e-
+007+006+006+006
s Use
91840
408494468450
kBTU/yr
1.30613e8.30736e1.74095e1.84608e
NaturalGa
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated
High Turnover (Sit
8
CO2e
4.9301
21.928425.146893.455799.0993
701.1408445.9468
1,391.647
004004003003003005
N2O
0.01280.0254
4.0000e-4.6000e-8.1300e-1.7000e-1.8100e-9.0000e-
004004003003003005
CH4
0.01340.0265
4.2000e-4.8000e-8.5000e-1.7800e-1.8900e-9.0000e-
MT/yr
8
4.9009
21.798824.998392.903698.5139
696.9989443.3124
1,383.426
Total CO2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
8
4.9009
21.798824.998392.903698.5139
696.9989443.3124
1,383.426
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
003003003003004
Total
0.04870.03100.0966
PM2.5
1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
003003003003004
PM2.5
0.04870.03100.0966
Exhaust1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
PM2.5
Fugitive
003003003003004
Total
PM10
0.04870.03100.0966
1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
Page 33 of 44
003003003003004
PM10
0.04870.03100.0966
Exhaust
1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
tons/yr
PM10
Fugitive
004003004003004004005003
SO2
1.2000e-3.8400e-1.4000e-2.4400e-5.1000e-5.4000e-3.0000e-7.6200e-
CO
003003
0.25610.01930.34210.07170.07600.7770
8.0100e-3.7800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
003
NOx
0.01880.60180.02300.40720.08530.09051.2312
4.5000e-
003003003003004
ROG
0.07040.04480.1398
2.2000e-2.5300e-9.3900e-9.9500e-5.0000e-
+007+006+006+006
s Use
91840
408494468450
kBTU/yr
1.30613e8.30736e1.74095e1.84608e
NaturalGa
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated
High Turnover (Sit
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Page 34 of 44
96
CO2e
33.8978
186.9165508.1135175.9672112.9141241.7395
1,262.0862,521.635
004003003003004003
N2O
0.01070.0215
2.9000e-1.5900e-4.3200e-1.5000e-9.6000e-2.0600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
MT/yr
003003003003003
CH4
0.05190.02090.1037
1.3900e-7.6900e-7.2400e-4.6500e-9.9400e-
95
33.7770
186.2502506.3022175.3399112.5116240.8778
1,257.5872,512.646
Total CO2
Use
+006+006
kWh/yr
106010584550550308353120756000
3.94697e1.58904e
Electricity
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated
High Turnover (Sit
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Page 35 of 44
96
CO2e
33.8978
186.9165508.1135175.9672112.9141241.7395
1,262.0862,521.635
004003003003004003
N2O
0.01070.0215
2.9000e-1.5900e-4.3200e-1.5000e-9.6000e-2.0600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
MT/yr
003003003003003
CH4
0.05190.02090.1037
1.3900e-7.6900e-7.2400e-4.6500e-9.9400e-
95
33.7770
186.2502506.3022175.3399112.5116240.8778
1,257.5872,512.646
Total CO2
Use
+006+006
kWh/yr
106010584550550308353120756000
3.94697e1.58904e
Electricity
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
High Turnover (Sit
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
17.2540
222.5835222.5835205.3295222.5835
003003003003
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.0000
3.7400e-3.7400e-3.7400e-3.7400e-
003
CH4CH4
0.02010.02010.00000.00000.01610.0201
3.9100e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.0000
16.8504
220.9670220.9670204.1166220.9670
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.0000
16.8504
220.9670220.9670204.1166220.9670
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.07140.07140.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.07140.07140.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
FugitiveFugitive
Page 36 of 44
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.07140.07140.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
PM10PM10
0.07140.07140.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
ExhaustExhaust
tons/yrtons/yr
PM10PM10
FugitiveFugitive
003003003004003
SO2SO2
1.6700e-1.6700e-1.1200e-5.4000e-1.6600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.0750
10.380410.380410.305410.3804
NOxNOx
0.29500.29500.17630.11870.2950
ROGROG
5.14375.14370.41374.39980.02060.30965.1437
Total
Hearth
Coating
Products
CategoryMitigated
Consumer
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Landscaping
SubCategoryArchitectural
6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated
CO2e
0.00000.0000
17.2540
205.3295222.5835
003003
N2O
0.00000.00000.0000
3.7400e-3.7400e-
003
CH4
0.00000.00000.01610.0201
3.9100e-
MT/yr
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
0.00000.0000
16.8504
204.1166220.9670
Total CO2
0.00000.0000
16.8504
204.1166220.9670
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Total
0.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
Exhaust
PM2.5
Fugitive
Page 37 of 44
Total
PM10
0.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
PM10
0.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
Exhaust
tons/yr
PM10
Fugitive
003004003
SO2
1.1200e-5.4000e-1.6600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CO
0.0750
10.305410.3804
NOx
0.17630.11870.2950
ROG
0.41374.39980.02060.30965.1437
Total
Hearth
Coating
Products
Consumer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Landscaping
SubCategoryArchitectural
6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated
7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Page 38 of 44
CO2e
683.7567683.7567
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
N2O
0.07550.0755
MT/yr
CH4
3.01833.0183
585.8052585.8052
Total CO2
CategoryMitigated
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Page 39 of 44
CO2e
7.5079
12.647161.601962.848213.966331.9490
493.2363683.7567
003003003003003003
N2O
0.05230.0755
1.3400e-6.5900e-8.8200e-1.0300e-1.9600e-3.4200e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
MT/yr
CH4
0.05352.08670.26270.35800.04160.07960.13633.0183
6.1633
10.909553.071951.270211.393427.5250
425.4719585.8052
Total CO2
Mgal
1.0268840.04854.902012.54236
door Use
0.6974820.1409270.154996
1.62885 / 63.5252 / 7.99802 / 10.9272 / 1.26834 / 2.42827 / 4.14806 /
Indoor/Out
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low
Shopping Center
7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Down Restaurant)
High Turnover (Sit
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Page 40 of 44
CO2e
7.5079
12.647161.601962.848213.966331.9490
493.2363683.7567
003003003003003003
N2O
0.05230.0755
1.3400e-6.5900e-8.8200e-1.0300e-1.9600e-3.4200e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
MT/yr
CH4
0.05352.08670.26270.35800.04160.07960.13633.0183
6.1633
10.909553.071951.270211.393427.5250
425.4719585.8052
Total CO2
Mgal
1.0268840.04854.902012.54236
door Use
0.6974820.1409270.154996
1.62885 / 63.5252 / 7.99802 / 10.9272 / 1.26834 / 2.42827 / 4.14806 /
Indoor/Out
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low
Shopping Center
7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Down Restaurant)
8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
High Turnover (Sit
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Page 41 of 44
CO2e
514.8354514.8354
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
N2O
0.00000.0000
MT/yr
CH4
12.281112.2811
207.8079207.8079
Total CO2
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Unmitigated
Category/Year
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Page 42 of 44
CO2e
5.78343.6712
21.046413.769429.5706
225.5513215.4430514.8354
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
MT/yr
CH4
0.13805.38040.50215.13930.32850.08760.7054
12.2811
2.33448.49525.55791.4818
91.041586.961311.9359
207.8079
Total CO2
7.3
tons11.558.8
448.541.85428.427.38
Waste
Disposed
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low
Shopping Center
8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Down Restaurant)
High Turnover (Sit
Fuel Type
Fuel Type
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Load Factor
Load Factor
Horse Power
Horse Power
Days/Year
Hours/Year
Page 43 of 44
Hours/Day
Hours/Day
CO2e
5.78343.6712
21.046413.769429.5706
225.5513215.4430514.8354
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Number
Number
MT/yr
CH4
0.13805.38040.50215.13930.32850.08760.7054
12.2811
2.33448.49525.55791.4818
91.041586.961311.9359
207.8079
Total CO2
7.3
tons11.558.8
448.541.85428.427.38
Waste
Disposed
Equipment Type
Equipment Type
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low
Shopping Center
8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated Down Restaurant)Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
9.0 Operational Offroad10.0 Stationary Equipment
High Turnover (Sit
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Fuel Type
Boiler Rating
Heat Input/Year
Page 44 of 44
Heat Input/Day
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Number
Number
Equipment Type
Equipment Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
BoilersUser Defined Equipment
11.0 Vegetation
00000
72
2789
Population
8,000.00
45,000.0036,000.0072,600.0025,000.0056,000.00
975,000.00
Floor Surface Area
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
332028
1.030.831.670.181.561.29
25.66
0.006
Lot Acreage
Precipitation Freq (Days)Operational YearN2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
MetricRoom
1000sqft1000sqft1000sqft1000sqft
Dwelling UnitDwelling Unit
Page 1 of 35
0.029
2.2
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Size8.00
45.0036.0050.0025.0056.00
975.00
Wind Speed (m/s)CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Urban9Southern California Edison702.44
Hotel
Land Uses
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
Regional Shopping Center
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage1.2 Other Project Characteristics UrbanizationClimate ZoneUtility CompanyCO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
0.000.000.000.006.173.871.393.756.164.180.69
79.8263.9910.7478.27
New Value
1.257.166.392.468.196.075.861.05
48.7594.3649.97
158.37131.84
1,019.201,019.20
Default Value
Page 2 of 35
ST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TR
SU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TR
NumberWoodNumberWood
Column Name
FireplaceWoodMassFireplaceWoodMass
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Table Name
tblFireplacestblFireplacestblFireplacestblFireplaces
tblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTrips
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual
construction phase lengths.Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See
SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.Energy
Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.Water
Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
3.206.395.834.136.413.849.430.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
57.6565.8062.64
5.956.596.658.171.251.25
72.1625.2411.0389.9542.7048.7548.7525.0025.00
127.15999.60999.60
Page 3 of 35
SU_TRSU_TRSU_TR
WD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TR
NumberCatalyticNumberCatalytic
WoodstoveDayYearWoodstoveDayYear
NumberNoncatalyticNumberNoncatalytic
WoodstoveWoodMassWoodstoveWoodMass
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
tblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodsto
vestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstoves
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.0 Emissions Summary
21
882188
CO2e
6,283.53515,278.5214,833.152,379.34215,278.52
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
CH4
1.94951.95031.02500.71771.9503
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
49
746974
6,234.79715,251.5614,807.522,361.39815,251.56
Total CO2
49
746974
6,234.79715,251.5614,807.522,361.39815,251.56
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Total
5.16153.37020.5476
PM2.5
11.866411.8664
PM2.5
1.88241.50570.73220.43221.8824
Exhaust
PM2.5
9.98403.65582.63810.47439.9840
Fugitive
Page 4 of 35
Total
PM10
1.8628
20.313510.772710.648220.3135
PM10
2.04611.63660.77940.46982.0461
Exhaust
lb/day
PM10
9.86889.86881.7884
18.267518.2675
Fugitive
SO2
0.06430.15170.14720.02440.1517
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CO
31.684049.562946.756715.104349.5629
NOx
9.5575
46.458838.896726.331746.4588
ROG
4.27695.33044.8957
237.1630237.1630
Year
2021202220232024
Maximum
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)Unmitigated Construction
21
882088
CO2e
0.00
CO2e
6,283.53515,278.5214,833.152,379.34215,278.52
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
N20
0.00
CH4
1.94951.95031.02500.71771.9503
CH40.00
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
49
746974
0.00
6,234.79715,251.5614,807.522,361.39815,251.56
Total CO2
Total CO2
49
746974
0.00
6,234.79715,251.5614,807.522,361.39815,251.56
NBio- CO2
NBio-CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
0.00
Bio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Total
5.16153.37020.54760.00
PM2.5
Total
11.866411.8664
PM2.5
0.00
PM2.5
1.88241.50570.73220.43221.8824
PM2.5
Exhaust
Exhaust
0.00
PM2.5
9.98403.65582.63810.47439.9840
PM2.5
Fugitive
Fugitive
Page 5 of 35
Total
0.00
PM10
1.8628Total
PM10
20.313510.772710.648220.3135
0.00
PM10
2.04611.63660.77940.46982.0461
PM10
Exhaust
Exhaust
lb/day
0.00
PM10
9.86889.86881.7884
PM10
18.267518.2675
Fugitive
Fugitive
SO2
0.00
SO2
0.06430.15170.14720.02440.1517
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CO
CO
0.00
31.684049.562946.756715.104349.5629
NOx
0.00
NOx
9.5575
46.458838.896726.331746.4588
ROG
0.00
ROG
4.27695.33044.8957
237.1630237.1630
Year
2021202220232024
Percent
Maximum
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)Mitigated Construction
77
920886920886
CO2eCO2e
18,259.118,405.63850,361.1277,025.8718,259.118,405.63850,361.1277,025.87
N2ON2O
0.33000.15320.48320.33000.15320.4832
CH4CH4
0.48740.16022.18072.82820.48740.16022.18072.8282
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
22
503416503416
18,148.598,355.98350,306.6076,811.1818,148.598,355.98350,306.6076,811.18
Total CO2Total CO2
22
503416503416
18,148.598,355.98350,306.6076,811.1818,148.598,355.98350,306.6076,811.18
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
1.59740.52921.59740.5292
PM2.5PM2.5
12.607014.733612.607014.7336
PM2.5PM2.5
1.59740.52920.31192.43851.59740.52920.31192.4385
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
12.295012.295012.295012.2950
FugitiveFugitive
Page 6 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
1.59740.52921.59740.5292
46.295148.421746.295148.4217
PM10PM10
1.59740.52920.33602.46261.59740.52920.33602.4626
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
45.959245.959245.959245.9592
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.09440.04180.49170.62780.09440.04180.49170.6278
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
4.25734.2573
88.443088.4430
114.8495207.5497114.8495207.5497
NOxNOx
6.74626.7462
15.049645.430467.226215.049645.430467.2262
ROGROG
0.76609.84890.76609.8489
30.502041.116830.502041.1168
AreaArea
TotalTotal
MobileMobile
EnergyEnergy
CategoryCategory
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated OperationalMitigated Operational
0.00
CO2e
N20
0.00
0.00
CH4
0.00
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
Total CO2
Phase Description
0.00
NBio-CO2
3020453535
500
0.00
Bio- CO2
Num Days
555555
0.00
Total
PM2.5
Week
Num Days
0.00
PM2.5
Exhaust
0.00
End Date
PM2.5
Fugitive
10/12/202111/9/20211/11/202212/12/20231/30/20243/19/2024
Page 7 of 35
0.00
Total
PM10
Start Date
0.00
PM10
9/1/202110/13/202111/10/20211/12/202212/13/20231/31/2024
Exhaust
0.00
PM10
Fugitive
0.00
SO2
Phase Type
sqft)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CO
0.00
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
0.00
NOx
0.00
ROG
Phase Name
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
Percent
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Phase
Number
3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase 123456 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400;
Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5Acres of Paving: 0OffRoad Equipment
0.730.380.400.400.370.380.410.400.480.370.290.200.740.370.450.420.360.380.48
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
Load Factor
819797898497468078
158247247158187247367231130132
Horse Power
8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.007.008.008.007.008.008.008.008.006.00
Usage Hours
1323421122131312221
Page 8 of 35
Amount
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Offroad Equipment Type
Concrete/Industrial SawsExcavatorsRubber Tired DozersRubber Tired DozersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesExcavatorsGradersRubber Tired DozersScrapersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesCranesForkliftsGenerator
SetsTractors/Loaders/BackhoesWeldersPaversPaving EquipmentRollersAir Compressors
Phase Name
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
DemolitionDemolitionDemolitionSite PreparationSite PreparationGradingGradingGradingGradingGradingBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding
ConstructionPavingPavingPavingArchitectural Coating Trips and VMT
44
CO2e
0.0000
3,774.3173,774.317
Hauling
N2O
Vehicle Class
HHDTHHDTHHDTHHDTHHDTHHDT
CH4
1.05491.0549
Vendor
Vehicle Class
HDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_Mix
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
99
0.0000
3,747.9443,747.944
Total CO2
Class
99
Worker Vehicle
3,747.9443,747.944
NBio- CO2
LD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_Mix
20.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.00
Bio- CO2
Length
Hauling Trip
Total
0.50081.44111.9419
PM2.5
6.906.906.906.906.906.90
Length
Vendor Trip
PM2.5
0.00001.44111.4411
Exhaust
14.7014.7014.7014.7014.7014.70
PM2.5
0.50080.5008
Length
Fugitive
Page 9 of 35
Worker Trip
0.000.000.000.000.00
Total
PM10
3.30741.55134.8588
458.00
Number
Hauling Trip
PM10
0.00001.55131.5513
Exhaust
0.000.000.000.000.00
lb/day
143.00
Number
PM10
3.30743.3074
Vendor Trip
Fugitive
15.0018.0020.0015.00
801.00160.00
SO2
0.03880.0388
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Number
Worker Trip
678961
CO
21.565021.5650
NOx
Count
31.440731.4407
Offroad Equipment
ROG
3.16513.1651
Total
Phase Name
CategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
7044
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
170.9413
1,294.4331,465.3753,774.3173,774.317
N2ON2O
003
CH4CH4
0.08770.00000.09271.05491.0549
5.0300e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
3899
0.00000.0000
170.8155
1,292.2411,463.0563,747.9443,747.944
Total CO2Total CO2
3899
0.0000
170.8155
1,292.2411,463.0563,747.9443,747.944
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.08520.00000.04570.13090.50081.44111.9419
PM2.5PM2.5
003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.01200.00000.01330.00001.44111.4411
ExhaustExhaust
1.2500e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.07320.00000.04450.11760.50080.5008
FugitiveFugitive
Page 10 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.27950.00000.16900.44853.30741.55134.8588
003
PM10PM10
0.01260.00000.01390.00001.55131.5513
ExhaustExhaust
1.3500e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.26690.00000.16770.43463.30743.3074
FugitiveFugitive
003
SO2SO2
0.01190.00000.01360.03880.0388
1.7100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.96020.00000.60421.5644
21.565021.5650
NOxNOx
4.09520.00000.04424.1394
31.440731.4407
ROGROG
0.12730.00000.06430.19163.16513.1651
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
7033
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
170.9413
1,294.4331,465.3753,715.4573,715.457
N2ON2O
003
CH4CH4
0.08770.00000.09271.19201.1920
5.0300e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
3899
0.00000.0000
170.8155
1,292.2411,463.0563,685.6563,685.656
Total CO2Total CO2
3899
0.0000
170.8155
1,292.2411,463.0563,685.6563,685.656
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.08520.00000.04570.13099.93071.8809
PM2.5PM2.5
11.8116
003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.01200.00000.01330.00001.88091.8809
ExhaustExhaust
1.2500e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.07320.00000.04450.11769.93079.9307
FugitiveFugitive
Page 11 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.27950.00000.16900.44852.0445
18.066320.1107
003
PM10PM10
0.01260.00000.01390.00002.04452.0445
ExhaustExhaust
1.3500e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.26690.00000.16770.4346
18.066318.0663
FugitiveFugitive
003
SO2SO2
0.01190.00000.01360.03800.0380
1.7100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.96020.00000.60421.5644
21.154321.1543
NOxNOx
4.09520.00000.04424.1394
40.497140.4971
ROGROG
0.12730.00000.06430.19163.88823.8882
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
205.1296205.1296
3,715.4573,715.457
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.19201.1920
6.0400e-6.0400e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
99
0.00000.00000.0000
204.9786204.9786
3,685.6563,685.656
Total CO2Total CO2
99
0.00000.0000
204.9786204.9786
3,685.6563,685.656
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.05490.05499.93071.8809
PM2.5PM2.5
11.8116
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.88091.8809
ExhaustExhaust
1.5000e-1.5000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.05340.05349.93079.9307
FugitiveFugitive
Page 12 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.20280.20282.0445
18.066320.1107
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00002.04452.0445
ExhaustExhaust
1.6300e-1.6300e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.20120.2012
18.066318.0663
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.03800.0380
2.0600e-2.0600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.72500.7250
21.154321.1543
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.05300.0530
40.497140.4971
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.07720.07723.88823.8882
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
44
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
205.1296205.1296
6,055.6136,055.613
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94281.9428
6.0400e-6.0400e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
44
0.00000.00000.0000
204.9786204.9786
6,007.0436,007.043
Total CO2Total CO2
44
0.00000.0000
204.9786204.9786
6,007.0436,007.043
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.05490.05493.59651.82655.4230
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.82651.8265
ExhaustExhaust
1.5000e-1.5000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.05340.05343.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 13 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.20280.20288.67331.9853
10.6587
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.98531.9853
ExhaustExhaust
1.6300e-1.6300e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.20120.20128.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06200.0620
2.0600e-2.0600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.72500.7250
30.878530.8785
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.05300.0530
46.399846.3998
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.07720.07724.19124.1912
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
44
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
227.9217227.9217
6,055.6136,055.613
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94281.9428
6.7100e-6.7100e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
44
0.00000.00000.0000
227.7540227.7540
6,007.0436,007.043
Total CO2Total CO2
44
0.00000.0000
227.7540227.7540
6,007.0436,007.043
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.06100.06103.59651.82655.4230
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.82651.8265
ExhaustExhaust
1.6600e-1.6600e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.05930.05933.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 14 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22540.22548.67331.9853
10.6587
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.98531.9853
ExhaustExhaust
1.8100e-1.8100e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22360.22368.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06200.0620
2.2900e-2.2900e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.80560.8056
30.878530.8785
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.05890.0589
46.399846.3998
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.08570.08574.19124.1912
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
88
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
227.9217227.9217
6,060.0156,060.015
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94421.9442
6.7100e-6.7100e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
55
0.00000.00000.0000
227.7540227.7540
6,011.4106,011.410
Total CO2Total CO2
55
0.00000.0000
227.7540227.7540
6,011.4106,011.410
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.06100.06103.59651.50415.1006
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.50411.5041
ExhaustExhaust
1.6600e-1.6600e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.05930.05933.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 15 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22540.22548.67331.6349
10.3082
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.63491.6349
ExhaustExhaust
1.8100e-1.8100e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22360.22368.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06210.0621
2.2900e-2.2900e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.80560.8056
29.041529.0415
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.05890.0589
38.843538.8435
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.08570.08573.62483.6248
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
88
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
219.8941219.8941
6,060.0156,060.015
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94421.9442
6.0600e-6.0600e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
55
0.00000.00000.0000
219.7425219.7425
6,011.4106,011.410
Total CO2Total CO2
55
0.00000.0000
219.7425219.7425
6,011.4106,011.410
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.06090.06093.59651.50415.1006
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.50411.5041
ExhaustExhaust
1.6100e-1.6100e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.05930.05933.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 16 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22530.22538.67331.6349
10.3082
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.63491.6349
ExhaustExhaust
1.7500e-1.7500e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22360.22368.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06210.0621
2.2100e-2.2100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.74320.7432
29.041529.0415
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.05320.0532
38.843538.8435
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.08030.08033.62483.6248
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
22
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
219.8941219.8941
2,569.6322,569.632
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.61200.6120
6.0600e-6.0600e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
66
0.00000.0000
219.7425219.7425
2,554.3332,554.333
Total CO2Total CO2
66
0.00000.0000
219.7425219.7425
2,554.3332,554.333
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.06090.06090.76120.7612
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.76120.7612
ExhaustExhaust
1.6100e-1.6100e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.05930.0593
FugitiveFugitive
Page 17 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22530.22530.80900.8090
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.80900.8090
ExhaustExhaust
1.7500e-1.7500e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22360.2236
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02690.0269
2.2100e-2.2100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.74320.7432
16.363416.3634
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.05320.0532
15.615615.6156
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.08030.08031.70621.7062
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
4222
66
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
3,902.1388,806.75812,708.892,569.6322,569.632
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.22360.24290.46650.61200.6120
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
2766
39
0.0000
3,896.5488,800.68512,697.232,554.3332,554.333
Total CO2Total CO2
2766
39
0.0000
3,896.5488,800.68512,697.232,554.3332,554.333
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.28732.43902.72630.76120.7612
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.02370.06460.08830.76120.7612
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26362.37452.6381
FugitiveFugitive
Page 18 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.94049.02349.96370.80900.8090
PM10PM10
0.00000.02480.07010.09490.80900.8090
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91558.95339.8688
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03640.08830.12470.02690.0269
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00003.4341
29.765433.199516.363416.3634
NOxNOx
0.00002.1318
13.203215.335015.615615.6156
ROGROG
0.00000.40793.21623.62421.70621.7062
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
4211
66
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
3,902.1388,806.75812,708.892,570.4062,570.406
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.22360.24290.46650.60790.6079
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
2799
39
0.0000
3,896.5488,800.68512,697.232,555.2092,555.209
Total CO2Total CO2
2799
39
0.0000
3,896.5488,800.68512,697.232,555.2092,555.209
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.28732.43902.72630.65840.6584
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.02370.06460.08830.65840.6584
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26362.37452.6381
FugitiveFugitive
Page 19 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.94049.02349.96370.69970.6997
PM10PM10
0.00000.02480.07010.09490.69970.6997
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91558.95339.8688
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03640.08830.12470.02690.0269
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00003.4341
29.765433.199516.244016.2440
NOxNOx
0.00002.1318
13.203215.335014.384914.3849
ROGROG
0.00000.40793.21623.62421.57281.5728
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
0011
60
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
3,778.8308,483.91612,262.742,570.4062,570.406
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.19820.21900.41720.60790.6079
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
2899
70
0.0000
3,773.8768,478.44012,252.312,555.2092,555.209
Total CO2Total CO2
2899
70
0.0000
3,773.8768,478.44012,252.312,555.2092,555.209
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.27472.43722.71180.65840.6584
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.01110.06270.07380.65840.6584
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26362.37452.6381
FugitiveFugitive
Page 20 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.92719.02149.94850.69970.6997
PM10PM10
0.00000.01160.06810.07970.69970.6997
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91568.95339.8688
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03520.08510.12030.02690.0269
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00003.1014
27.411330.512716.244016.2440
NOxNOx
0.00001.9287
10.018111.946814.384914.3849
ROGROG
0.00000.30273.02033.32291.57281.5728
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
0066
60
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
3,778.8308,483.91612,262.742,225.4332,225.433
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.19820.21900.41720.71400.7140
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
2811
70
0.00000.0000
3,773.8768,478.44012,252.312,207.5842,207.584
Total CO2Total CO2
2811
70
0.0000
3,773.8768,478.44012,252.312,207.5842,207.584
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.27472.43722.71180.46940.00000.4694
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.01110.06270.07380.46940.00000.4694
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26362.37452.6381
FugitiveFugitive
Page 21 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.92719.02149.94850.51020.00000.5102
PM10PM10
0.00000.01160.06810.07970.51020.00000.5102
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91568.95339.8688
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03520.08510.12030.02280.0228
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00003.1014
27.411330.512714.584214.5842
NOxNOx
0.00001.9287
10.018111.946810.191710.1917
ROGROG
0.00000.30273.02033.32291.03270.00001.0327
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
66
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
158.8748158.8748
2,225.4332,225.433
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.71400.7140
4.1000e-4.1000e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
11
0.00000.00000.0000
158.7723158.7723
2,207.5842,207.584
Total CO2Total CO2
11
0.00000.0000
158.7723158.7723
2,207.5842,207.584
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04560.04560.46940.00000.4694
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.46940.00000.4694
ExhaustExhaust
1.1700e-1.1700e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04450.0445
FugitiveFugitive
Page 22 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16890.16890.51020.00000.5102
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.51020.00000.5102
ExhaustExhaust
1.2800e-1.2800e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16770.1677
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02280.0228
1.5900e-1.5900e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.51330.5133
14.584214.5842
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.03610.0361
10.191710.1917
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.05660.05661.03270.00001.0327
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
158.8748158.8748
2,225.3962,225.396
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.71400.7140
4.1000e-4.1000e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
22
0.00000.00000.0000
158.7723158.7723
2,207.5472,207.547
Total CO2Total CO2
22
0.00000.0000
158.7723158.7723
2,207.5472,207.547
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04560.04560.43100.00000.4310
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.43100.00000.4310
ExhaustExhaust
1.1700e-1.1700e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04450.0445
FugitiveFugitive
Page 23 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16890.16890.46850.00000.4685
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.46850.00000.4685
ExhaustExhaust
1.2800e-1.2800e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16770.1677
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02280.0228
1.5900e-1.5900e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.51330.5133
14.625814.6258
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.03610.03619.52469.5246
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.05660.05660.98820.00000.9882
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
153.9458153.9458
2,225.3962,225.396
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.71400.7140
3.7600e-3.7600e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
22
0.00000.00000.0000
153.8517153.8517
2,207.5472,207.547
Total CO2Total CO2
22
0.00000.0000
153.8517153.8517
2,207.5472,207.547
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04560.04560.43100.00000.4310
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.43100.00000.4310
ExhaustExhaust
1.1600e-1.1600e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04450.0445
FugitiveFugitive
Page 24 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16890.16890.46850.00000.4685
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.46850.00000.4685
ExhaustExhaust
1.2600e-1.2600e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16770.1677
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02280.0228
1.5400e-1.5400e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.47850.4785
14.625814.6258
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.03290.03299.52469.5246
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.05350.05350.98820.00000.9882
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
153.9458153.9458281.8443281.8443
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.01590.0159
3.7600e-3.7600e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
0.00000.00000.0000
153.8517153.8517281.4481281.4481
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.0000
153.8517153.8517281.4481281.4481
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04560.04560.00000.06090.0609
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
1.1600e-1.1600e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04450.0445
FugitiveFugitive
Page 25 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16890.16890.00000.06090.0609
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
1.2600e-1.2600e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16770.1677
FugitiveFugitive
003003003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.5400e-1.5400e-2.9700e-2.9700e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.47850.47851.81011.8101
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.03290.03291.21881.2188
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.05350.05350.1808
236.4115236.5923
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Archit. Coating
3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
66
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
281.8443281.8443
1,642.0881,642.088
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.04010.04010.01590.0159
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
22
0.00000.00000.0000
281.4481281.4481
1,641.0851,641.085
Total CO2Total CO2
22
0.00000.0000
281.4481281.4481
1,641.0851,641.085
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.48660.48660.00000.06090.0609
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.01230.01230.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.47430.4743
FugitiveFugitive
Page 26 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00001.80181.80180.00000.06090.0609
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.01340.01340.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00001.78841.7884
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.01650.0165
2.9700e-2.9700e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00005.10445.10441.81011.8101
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.35130.35131.21881.2188
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.57070.57070.1808
236.4115236.5923
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Archit. Coating
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
66
CO2e
0.00000.0000
1,642.0881,642.088
N2O
CH4
0.00000.00000.04010.0401
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
22
0.00000.0000
1,641.0851,641.085
Total CO2
22
0.00000.0000
1,641.0851,641.085
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Total
0.00000.00000.48660.4866
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.00000.00000.01230.0123
Exhaust
PM2.5
0.00000.00000.47430.4743
Fugitive
Page 27 of 35
Total
PM10
0.00000.00001.80181.8018
PM10
0.00000.00000.01340.0134
Exhaust
lb/day
PM10
0.00000.00001.78841.7884
Fugitive
SO2
0.00000.00000.01650.0165
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CO
0.00000.00005.10445.1044
NOx
0.00000.00000.35130.3513
ROG
0.00000.00000.57070.5707
Total
VendorWorker
Hauling
Category
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
0808
CO2e
50,361.1250,361.12
N2O
CH4
2.18072.1807
506,227706,812445,703707,488
Mitigated
3,413,9371,112,221
13,660,06520,552,452
Annual VMT
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
3434
50,306.6050,306.60
Total CO2
3434
50,306.6050,306.60
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
506,227706,812445,703707,488
3,413,9371,112,221
13,660,06520,552,452
Unmitigated
Annual VMT
Total
PM2.5
12.607012.6070
PM2.5
0.31190.3119
Exhaust
31.05
154.00160.00461.20357.84
PM2.5
4075.502817.72
8,057.31
12.295012.2950
Fugitive
Page 28 of 35
Sunday
Total
PM10
46.295146.2951
62.55
154.25187.50511.92601.44
3,773.252,873.528,164.43
Saturday
PM10
0.33600.3360
Exhaust
lb/day
Average Daily Trip Rate
PM10
45.959245.9592
Fugitive
145.75288.45192.00501.12528.08
4,026.752,368.808,050.95
Weekday
SO2
0.49170.4917
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CO
114.8495114.8495
NOx
45.430445.4304
Total
Hotel
Land Use
ROG
9.84899.8489
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
Regional Shopping Center
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
CategoryMitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Unmitigated
4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information
MH
0.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.000821
SBUS
0.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.000712
3344
434411
Pass-by
MCY
0.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.005285
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
11111920381835
UBUS
0.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.001817
Trip Purpose %
Diverted
OBUS
0.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.002613
86867737583854
Primary
HHD
0.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.033577
40.6040.6019.0019.0019.0019.0019.00
MHD
0.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.021166
H-O or C-NW
Trip %
LHD2
19.2019.2048.0072.5061.6069.0064.70
0.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.006332
H-S or C-C
Page 29 of 35
LHD1
0.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.014033
8.50
40.2040.2033.0019.4012.0016.30
H-W or C-W
MDV
0.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.116369
8.708.706.906.906.906.906.90
H-O or C-NW
LDT2
0.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.209971
5.905.908.408.408.408.408.40
Miles
H-S or C-C
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
LDT1
0.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.044216
14.7014.7016.6016.6016.6016.6016.60
LDA
0.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.543088
H-W or C-W
Hotel
Hotel
Land Use
Land Use
Restaurant)
Restaurant)
Quality Restaurant
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
General Office Building
High Turnover (Sit Down
High Turnover (Sit Down
Regional Shopping Center
Regional Shopping Center
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Historical Energy Use: N
4.4 Fleet Mix 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
77
CO2e
8,405.6388,405.638
N2O
0.15320.1532
CH4
0.16020.1602
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
22
8,355.9838,355.983
Total CO2
22
8,355.9838,355.983
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Total
0.52920.5292
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.52920.5292
Exhaust
PM2.5
Fugitive
Page 30 of 35
Total
PM10
0.52920.5292
PM10
0.52920.5292
Exhaust
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
SO2
0.04180.0418
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CO
4.25734.2573
NOx
6.74626.7462
ROG
0.76600.7660
CategoryMitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
NaturalGasNaturalGasUnmitigated
907
CO2e
29.7778
132.4486151.8884564.4782598.5658
4,234.9332,693.5468,405.638
003003004
N2O
0.07720.04910.01030.01090.1532
2.4100e-2.7700e-5.4000e-
003003004
CH4
0.08070.05130.01080.01140.1602
2.5200e-2.8900e-5.7000e-
lb/day
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
Total CO2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
003003003
Total
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
PM2.5
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
003003003
PM2.5
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
PM2.5
Fugitive
003003003
Total
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
Page 31 of 35
003003003
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
004004003003004
SO2
0.02110.01340.0418
6.6000e-7.5000e-2.8100e-2.9800e-1.5000e-
CO
0.04391.40330.10571.87430.39280.41650.02074.2573
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
NOx
0.10313.29780.12582.23140.46760.49590.02476.7463
003
ROG
0.01210.38590.01380.24550.05140.05450.7660
2.7100e-
s Use
kBTU/yr1119.1635784.31283.4222759.94769.725057.75251.616
NaturalGa
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated
High Turnover (Sit
907
CO2e
29.7778
132.4486151.8884564.4782598.5658
4,234.9332,693.5468,405.638
003003004
N2O
0.07720.04910.01030.01090.1532
2.4100e-2.7700e-5.4000e-
003003004
CH4
0.08070.05130.01080.01140.1602
2.5200e-2.8900e-5.7000e-
lb/day
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
Total CO2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
003003003
Total
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
PM2.5
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
003003003
PM2.5
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
PM2.5
Fugitive
003003003
Total
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
Page 32 of 35
003003003
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
004004003003004
SO2
0.02110.01340.0418
6.6000e-7.5000e-2.8100e-2.9800e-1.5000e-
CO
0.04391.40330.10571.87430.39280.41650.02074.2573
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
NOx
0.10313.29780.12582.23140.46760.49590.02476.7463
003
ROG
0.01210.38590.01380.24550.05140.05450.7660
2.7100e-
s Use
kBTU/yr1.1191635.78431.2834222.75994.769725.05775
0.251616
NaturalGa
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
High Turnover (Sit
92925092
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
152.1542
18,259.1118,259.1118,106.9618,259.11
N2ON2O
0.33000.33000.33000.3300
CH4CH4
0.48740.48740.34500.14240.4874
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
50500050
0.00000.0000
148.5950
18,148.5918,148.5918,000.0018,148.59
Total CO2Total CO2
50500050
148.5950
18,148.5918,148.5918,000.0018,148.59
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
FugitiveFugitive
Page 33 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM10PM10
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
FugitiveFugitive
003
SO2SO2
0.09440.09440.09000.0944
4.3600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
6.0000
88.443088.443082.443088.4430
NOxNOx
0.9496
15.049615.049614.100015.0496
ROGROG
2.26701.65002.4766
30.502030.502024.108530.5020
Total
Hearth
Coating
Products
CategoryMitigated
Consumer
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Landscaping
SubCategoryArchitectural
6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated
5092
CO2e
0.00000.0000
152.1542
18,106.9618,259.11
N2O
0.33000.3300
Fuel Type
CH4
0.34500.14240.4874
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
0050
0.00000.0000
148.5950
18,000.0018,148.59
Total CO2
Load Factor
0050
148.5950
18,000.0018,148.59
NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Horse Power
Total
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
Exhaust
Days/Year
PM2.5
Fugitive
Page 34 of 35
Total
PM10
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM10
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
Exhaust
Hours/Day
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
003
SO2
0.09000.0944
4.3600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Number
CO
6.0000
82.443088.4430
NOx
0.9496
14.100015.0496
ROG
2.26701.65002.4766
24.108530.5020
Equipment Type
Total
Hearth
Coating
Products
Consumer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Landscaping
SubCategoryArchitectural
6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated
7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fuel Type
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM
Fuel Type
Load Factor
Boiler Rating
Horse Power
Hours/Year
Heat Input/Year
Page 35 of 35
Hours/Day
Heat Input/Day
NumberNumber
Number
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Equipment TypeEquipment Type
Equipment Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
BoilersUser Defined Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators 11.0 Vegetation
00000
72
2789
Population
8,000.00
45,000.0036,000.0072,600.0025,000.0056,000.00
975,000.00
Floor Surface Area
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
332028
1.030.831.670.181.561.29
25.66
0.006
Lot Acreage
Precipitation Freq (Days)Operational YearN2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
MetricRoom
1000sqft1000sqft1000sqft1000sqft
Dwelling UnitDwelling Unit
Page 1 of 35
0.029
2.2
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Size8.00
45.0036.0050.0025.0056.00
975.00
Wind Speed (m/s)CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Urban9Southern California Edison702.44
Hotel
Land Uses
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
Regional Shopping Center
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage1.2 Other Project Characteristics UrbanizationClimate ZoneUtility CompanyCO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
0.000.000.000.006.173.871.393.756.164.180.69
79.8263.9910.7478.27
New Value
1.257.166.392.468.196.075.861.05
48.7594.3649.97
158.37131.84
1,019.201,019.20
Default Value
Page 2 of 35
ST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TR
SU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TR
NumberWoodNumberWood
Column Name
FireplaceWoodMassFireplaceWoodMass
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Table Name
tblFireplacestblFireplacestblFireplacestblFireplaces
tblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTrips
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual
construction phase lengths.Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See
SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.Energy
Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.Water
Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
3.206.395.834.136.413.849.430.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
57.6565.8062.64
5.956.596.658.171.251.25
72.1625.2411.0389.9542.7048.7548.7525.0025.00
127.15999.60999.60
Page 3 of 35
SU_TRSU_TRSU_TR
WD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TR
NumberCatalyticNumberCatalytic
WoodstoveDayYearWoodstoveDayYear
NumberNoncatalyticNumberNoncatalytic
WoodstoveWoodMassWoodstoveWoodMass
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
tblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodsto
vestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstoves
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.0 Emissions Summary
40
636063
CO2e
6,270.22114,657.2614,235.912,370.35514,657.26
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
CH4
1.94911.94991.02300.71751.9499
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
78
992499
6,221.49314,630.3014,210.342,352.41714,630.30
Total CO2
78
992499
6,221.49314,630.3014,210.342,352.41714,630.30
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Total
5.16153.37080.5476
PM2.5
11.866411.8664
PM2.5
1.88241.50570.73280.43221.8824
Exhaust
PM2.5
9.98403.65582.63810.47439.9840
Fugitive
Page 4 of 35
Total
PM10
1.8628
20.313510.773610.648820.3135
PM10
2.04611.63660.78000.46982.0461
Exhaust
lb/day
PM10
9.86889.86881.7884
18.267518.2675
Fugitive
SO2
0.06420.14550.14130.02430.1455
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CO
31.615047.331944.593615.061147.3319
NOx
9.5610
46.465138.902426.491446.4651
ROG
4.28655.72185.2705
237.2328237.2328
Year
2021202220232024
Maximum
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)Unmitigated Construction
40
636063
CO2e
0.00
CO2e
6,270.22114,657.2614,235.912,370.35514,657.26
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
N20
0.00
CH4
1.94911.94991.02300.71751.9499
CH40.00
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
78
992499
0.00
6,221.49314,630.3014,210.342,352.41714,630.30
Total CO2
Total CO2
78
992499
0.00
6,221.49314,630.3014,210.342,352.41714,630.30
NBio- CO2
NBio-CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
0.00
Bio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Total
5.16153.37080.54760.00
PM2.5
Total
11.866411.8664
PM2.5
0.00
PM2.5
1.88241.50570.73280.43221.8824
PM2.5
Exhaust
Exhaust
0.00
PM2.5
9.98403.65582.63810.47439.9840
PM2.5
Fugitive
Fugitive
Page 5 of 35
Total
0.00
PM10
1.8628Total
PM10
20.313510.773610.648820.3135
0.00
PM10
2.04611.63660.78000.46982.0461
PM10
Exhaust
Exhaust
lb/day
0.00
PM10
9.86889.86881.7884
PM10
18.267518.2675
Fugitive
Fugitive
SO2
0.00
SO2
0.06420.14550.14130.02430.1455
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CO
CO
0.00
31.615047.331944.593615.061147.3319
NOx
0.00
NOx
9.5610
46.465138.902426.491446.4651
ROG
0.00
ROG
4.28655.72185.2705
237.2328237.2328
Year
2021202220232024
Percent
Maximum
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)Mitigated Construction
77
923917923917
CO2eCO2e
18,259.118,405.63847,972.6874,637.4418,259.118,405.63847,972.6874,637.44
N2ON2O
0.33000.15320.48320.33000.15320.4832
CH4CH4
0.48740.16022.19532.84290.48740.16022.19532.8429
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
22
500587500587
18,148.598,355.98347,917.8074,422.3718,148.598,355.98347,917.8074,422.37
Total CO2Total CO2
22
500587500587
18,148.598,355.98347,917.8074,422.3718,148.598,355.98347,917.8074,422.37
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
1.59740.52921.59740.5292
PM2.5PM2.5
12.608314.734912.608314.7349
PM2.5PM2.5
1.59740.52920.31322.43991.59740.52920.31322.4399
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
12.295012.295012.295012.2950
FugitiveFugitive
Page 6 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
1.59740.52921.59740.5292
46.296548.423146.296548.4231
PM10PM10
1.59740.52920.33732.46401.59740.52920.33732.4640
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
45.959245.959245.959245.9592
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.09440.04180.46810.60430.09440.04180.46810.6043
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
4.25734.2573
88.443088.4430
110.0422202.7424110.0422202.7424
NOxNOx
6.74626.7462
15.049645.991467.787215.049645.991467.7872
ROGROG
0.76609.52330.76609.5233
30.502040.791230.502040.7912
AreaArea
TotalTotal
MobileMobile
EnergyEnergy
CategoryCategory
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated OperationalMitigated Operational
0.00
CO2e
N20
0.00
0.00
CH4
0.00
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
Total CO2
Phase Description
0.00
NBio-CO2
3020453535
500
0.00
Bio- CO2
Num Days
555555
0.00
Total
PM2.5
Week
Num Days
0.00
PM2.5
Exhaust
0.00
End Date
PM2.5
Fugitive
10/12/202111/9/20211/11/202212/12/20231/30/20243/19/2024
Page 7 of 35
0.00
Total
PM10
Start Date
0.00
PM10
9/1/202110/13/202111/10/20211/12/202212/13/20231/31/2024
Exhaust
0.00
PM10
Fugitive
0.00
SO2
Phase Type
sqft)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CO
0.00
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
0.00
NOx
0.00
ROG
Phase Name
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
Percent
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Phase
Number
3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase 123456 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400;
Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5Acres of Paving: 0OffRoad Equipment
0.730.380.400.400.370.380.410.400.480.370.290.200.740.370.450.420.360.380.48
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
Load Factor
819797898497468078
158247247158187247367231130132
Horse Power
8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.007.008.008.007.008.008.008.008.006.00
Usage Hours
1323421122131312221
Page 8 of 35
Amount
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Offroad Equipment Type
Concrete/Industrial SawsExcavatorsRubber Tired DozersRubber Tired DozersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesExcavatorsGradersRubber Tired DozersScrapersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesCranesForkliftsGenerator
SetsTractors/Loaders/BackhoesWeldersPaversPaving EquipmentRollersAir Compressors
Phase Name
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
DemolitionDemolitionDemolitionSite PreparationSite PreparationGradingGradingGradingGradingGradingBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding
ConstructionPavingPavingPavingArchitectural Coating Trips and VMT
44
CO2e
0.0000
3,774.3173,774.317
Hauling
N2O
Vehicle Class
HHDTHHDTHHDTHHDTHHDTHHDT
CH4
1.05491.0549
Vendor
Vehicle Class
HDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_Mix
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
99
0.0000
3,747.9443,747.944
Total CO2
Class
99
Worker Vehicle
3,747.9443,747.944
NBio- CO2
LD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_Mix
20.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.00
Bio- CO2
Length
Hauling Trip
Total
0.50081.44111.9419
PM2.5
6.906.906.906.906.906.90
Length
Vendor Trip
PM2.5
0.00001.44111.4411
Exhaust
14.7014.7014.7014.7014.7014.70
PM2.5
0.50080.5008
Length
Fugitive
Page 9 of 35
Worker Trip
0.000.000.000.000.00
Total
PM10
3.30741.55134.8588
458.00
Number
Hauling Trip
PM10
0.00001.55131.5513
Exhaust
0.000.000.000.000.00
lb/day
143.00
Number
PM10
3.30743.3074
Vendor Trip
Fugitive
15.0018.0020.0015.00
801.00160.00
SO2
0.03880.0388
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Number
Worker Trip
678961
CO
21.565021.5650
NOx
Count
31.440731.4407
Offroad Equipment
ROG
3.16513.1651
Total
Phase Name
CategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
2244
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
160.9560
1,272.1251,433.0813,774.3173,774.317
N2ON2O
003
CH4CH4
0.09080.00000.09551.05491.0549
4.7300e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
5299
0.00000.0000
160.8377
1,269.8551,430.6933,747.9443,747.944
Total CO2Total CO2
5299
0.0000
160.8377
1,269.8551,430.6933,747.9443,747.944
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.08540.00000.04570.13110.50081.44111.9419
PM2.5PM2.5
003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.01220.00000.01350.00001.44111.4411
ExhaustExhaust
1.2500e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.07320.00000.04450.11760.50080.5008
FugitiveFugitive
Page 10 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.27970.00000.16900.44873.30741.55134.8588
003
PM10PM10
0.01280.00000.01410.00001.55131.5513
ExhaustExhaust
1.3500e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.26690.00000.16770.43463.30743.3074
FugitiveFugitive
003
SO2SO2
0.01170.00000.01330.03880.0388
1.6100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
1.01820.00000.55241.5706
21.565021.5650
NOxNOx
4.14540.00000.04894.1943
31.440731.4407
ROGROG
0.13040.00000.07150.20193.16513.1651
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
2233
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
160.9560
1,272.1251,433.0813,715.4573,715.457
N2ON2O
003
CH4CH4
0.09080.00000.09551.19201.1920
4.7300e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
5299
0.00000.0000
160.8377
1,269.8551,430.6933,685.6563,685.656
Total CO2Total CO2
5299
0.0000
160.8377
1,269.8551,430.6933,685.6563,685.656
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.08540.00000.04570.13119.93071.8809
PM2.5PM2.5
11.8116
003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.01220.00000.01350.00001.88091.8809
ExhaustExhaust
1.2500e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.07320.00000.04450.11769.93079.9307
FugitiveFugitive
Page 11 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.27970.00000.16900.44872.0445
18.066320.1107
003
PM10PM10
0.01280.00000.01410.00002.04452.0445
ExhaustExhaust
1.3500e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.26690.00000.16770.4346
18.066318.0663
FugitiveFugitive
003
SO2SO2
0.01170.00000.01330.03800.0380
1.6100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
1.01820.00000.55241.5706
21.154321.1543
NOxNOx
4.14540.00000.04894.1943
40.497140.4971
ROGROG
0.13040.00000.07150.20193.88823.8882
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
193.1472193.1472
3,715.4573,715.457
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.19201.1920
5.6800e-5.6800e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
99
0.00000.00000.0000
193.0052193.0052
3,685.6563,685.656
Total CO2Total CO2
99
0.00000.0000
193.0052193.0052
3,685.6563,685.656
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.05490.05499.93071.8809
PM2.5PM2.5
11.8116
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.88091.8809
ExhaustExhaust
1.5000e-1.5000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.05340.05349.93079.9307
FugitiveFugitive
Page 12 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.20280.20282.0445
18.066320.1107
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00002.04452.0445
ExhaustExhaust
1.6300e-1.6300e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.20120.2012
18.066318.0663
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.03800.0380
1.9400e-1.9400e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.66290.6629
21.154321.1543
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.05870.0587
40.497140.4971
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.08580.08583.88823.8882
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
44
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
193.1472193.1472
6,055.6136,055.613
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94281.9428
5.6800e-5.6800e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
44
0.00000.00000.0000
193.0052193.0052
6,007.0436,007.043
Total CO2Total CO2
44
0.00000.0000
193.0052193.0052
6,007.0436,007.043
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.05490.05493.59651.82655.4230
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.82651.8265
ExhaustExhaust
1.5000e-1.5000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.05340.05343.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 13 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.20280.20288.67331.9853
10.6587
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.98531.9853
ExhaustExhaust
1.6300e-1.6300e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.20120.20128.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06200.0620
1.9400e-1.9400e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.66290.6629
30.878530.8785
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.05870.0587
46.399846.3998
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.08580.08584.19124.1912
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
44
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
214.6080214.6080
6,055.6136,055.613
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94281.9428
6.3100e-6.3100e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
44
0.00000.00000.0000
214.4502214.4502
6,007.0436,007.043
Total CO2Total CO2
44
0.00000.0000
214.4502214.4502
6,007.0436,007.043
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.06100.06103.59651.82655.4230
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.82651.8265
ExhaustExhaust
1.6600e-1.6600e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.05930.05933.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 14 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22540.22548.67331.9853
10.6587
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.98531.9853
ExhaustExhaust
1.8100e-1.8100e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22360.22368.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06200.0620
2.1500e-2.1500e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.73650.7365
30.878530.8785
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.06520.0652
46.399846.3998
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.09540.09544.19124.1912
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
88
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
214.6080214.6080
6,060.0156,060.015
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94421.9442
6.3100e-6.3100e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
55
0.00000.00000.0000
214.4502214.4502
6,011.4106,011.410
Total CO2Total CO2
55
0.00000.0000
214.4502214.4502
6,011.4106,011.410
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.06100.06103.59651.50415.1006
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.50411.5041
ExhaustExhaust
1.6600e-1.6600e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.05930.05933.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 15 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22540.22548.67331.6349
10.3082
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.63491.6349
ExhaustExhaust
1.8100e-1.8100e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22360.22368.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06210.0621
2.1500e-2.1500e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.73650.7365
29.041529.0415
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.06520.0652
38.843538.8435
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.09540.09543.62483.6248
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
88
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
207.0563207.0563
6,060.0156,060.015
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94421.9442
5.7000e-5.7000e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
55
0.00000.00000.0000
206.9139206.9139
6,011.4106,011.410
Total CO2Total CO2
55
0.00000.0000
206.9139206.9139
6,011.4106,011.410
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.06090.06093.59651.50415.1006
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.50411.5041
ExhaustExhaust
1.6100e-1.6100e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.05930.05933.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 16 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22530.22538.67331.6349
10.3082
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.63491.6349
ExhaustExhaust
1.7500e-1.7500e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22360.22368.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06210.0621
2.0800e-2.0800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.67840.6784
29.041529.0415
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.05890.0589
38.843538.8435
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.08960.08963.62483.6248
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
22
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
207.0563207.0563
2,569.6322,569.632
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.61200.6120
5.7000e-5.7000e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
66
0.00000.0000
206.9139206.9139
2,554.3332,554.333
Total CO2Total CO2
66
0.00000.0000
206.9139206.9139
2,554.3332,554.333
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.06090.06090.76120.7612
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.76120.7612
ExhaustExhaust
1.6100e-1.6100e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.05930.0593
FugitiveFugitive
Page 17 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22530.22530.80900.8090
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.80900.8090
ExhaustExhaust
1.7500e-1.7500e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.22360.2236
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02690.0269
2.0800e-2.0800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.67840.6784
16.363416.3634
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.05890.0589
15.615615.6156
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.08960.08961.70621.7062
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3822
41
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
3,795.0288,292.60512,087.632,569.6322,569.632
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.23810.22820.46630.61200.6120
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
0366
63
0.0000
3,789.0758,286.90112,075.972,554.3332,554.333
Total CO2Total CO2
0366
63
0.0000
3,789.0758,286.90112,075.972,554.3332,554.333
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.28812.43902.72710.76120.7612
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.02450.06460.08910.76120.7612
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26362.37452.6381
FugitiveFugitive
Page 18 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.94129.02349.96450.80900.8090
PM10PM10
0.00000.02560.07010.09570.80900.8090
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91558.95339.8688
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03540.08320.11860.02690.0269
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00003.8005
27.168030.968516.363416.3634
NOxNOx
0.00002.3593
13.167315.526615.615615.6156
ROGROG
0.00000.42843.58724.01561.70621.7062
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
3811
41
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
3,795.0288,292.60512,087.632,570.4062,570.406
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.23810.22820.46630.60790.6079
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
0399
63
0.0000
3,789.0758,286.90112,075.972,555.2092,555.209
Total CO2Total CO2
0399
63
0.0000
3,789.0758,286.90112,075.972,555.2092,555.209
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.28812.43902.72710.65840.6584
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.02450.06460.08910.65840.6584
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26362.37452.6381
FugitiveFugitive
Page 19 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.94129.02349.96450.69970.6997
PM10PM10
0.00000.02560.07010.09570.69970.6997
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91558.95339.8688
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03540.08320.11860.02690.0269
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00003.8005
27.168030.968516.244016.2440
NOxNOx
0.00002.3593
13.167315.526614.384914.3849
ROGROG
0.00000.42843.58724.01561.57281.5728
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
7311
99
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
3,676.6417,988.86811,665.502,570.4062,570.406
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.20960.20550.41510.60790.6079
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
7899
25
0.0000
3,671.4007,983.73111,655.132,555.2092,555.209
Total CO2Total CO2
7899
25
0.0000
3,671.4007,983.73111,655.132,555.2092,555.209
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.27522.43722.71240.65840.6584
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.01160.06270.07430.65840.6584
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26362.37452.6381
FugitiveFugitive
Page 20 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.92779.02149.94910.69970.6997
PM10PM10
0.00000.01220.06810.08030.69970.6997
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91568.95339.8688
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03430.08010.11440.02690.0269
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00003.3771
24.972528.349616.244016.2440
NOxNOx
0.00009.97262.1338
12.106514.384914.3849
ROGROG
0.00000.31833.37953.69781.57281.5728
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
7366
99
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
3,676.6417,988.86811,665.502,225.4332,225.433
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.20960.20550.41510.71400.7140
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
7811
25
0.00000.0000
3,671.4007,983.73111,655.132,207.5842,207.584
Total CO2Total CO2
7811
25
0.0000
3,671.4007,983.73111,655.132,207.5842,207.584
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.27522.43722.71240.46940.00000.4694
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.01160.06270.07430.46940.00000.4694
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26362.37452.6381
FugitiveFugitive
Page 21 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.92779.02149.94910.51020.00000.5102
PM10PM10
0.00000.01220.06810.08030.51020.00000.5102
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91568.95339.8688
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03430.08010.11440.02280.0228
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00003.3771
24.972528.349614.584214.5842
NOxNOx
0.00009.97262.1338
12.106510.191710.1917
ROGROG
0.00000.31833.37953.69781.03270.00001.0327
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
66
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
149.6043149.6043
2,225.4332,225.433
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.71400.7140
3.8500e-3.8500e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
11
0.00000.00000.0000
149.5081149.5081
2,207.5842,207.584
Total CO2Total CO2
11
0.00000.0000
149.5081149.5081
2,207.5842,207.584
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04560.04560.46940.00000.4694
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.46940.00000.4694
ExhaustExhaust
1.1700e-1.1700e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04450.0445
FugitiveFugitive
Page 22 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16890.16890.51020.00000.5102
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.51020.00000.5102
ExhaustExhaust
1.2800e-1.2800e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16770.1677
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02280.0228
1.5000e-1.5000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.46770.4677
14.584214.5842
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.04000.0400
10.191710.1917
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.06330.06331.03270.00001.0327
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
149.6043149.6043
2,225.3962,225.396
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.71400.7140
3.8500e-3.8500e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
22
0.00000.00000.0000
149.5081149.5081
2,207.5472,207.547
Total CO2Total CO2
22
0.00000.0000
149.5081149.5081
2,207.5472,207.547
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04560.04560.43100.00000.4310
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.43100.00000.4310
ExhaustExhaust
1.1700e-1.1700e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04450.0445
FugitiveFugitive
Page 23 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16890.16890.46850.00000.4685
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.46850.00000.4685
ExhaustExhaust
1.2800e-1.2800e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16770.1677
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02280.0228
1.5000e-1.5000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.46770.4677
14.625814.6258
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.04000.04009.52469.5246
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.06330.06330.98820.00000.9882
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
144.9587144.9587
2,225.3962,225.396
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.71400.7140
3.5300e-3.5300e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
22
0.00000.00000.0000
144.8706144.8706
2,207.5472,207.547
Total CO2Total CO2
22
0.00000.0000
144.8706144.8706
2,207.5472,207.547
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04560.04560.43100.00000.4310
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.43100.00000.4310
ExhaustExhaust
1.1600e-1.1600e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04450.0445
FugitiveFugitive
Page 24 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16890.16890.46850.00000.4685
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.46850.00000.4685
ExhaustExhaust
1.2600e-1.2600e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16770.1677
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02280.0228
1.4500e-1.4500e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.43540.4354
14.625814.6258
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.03640.03649.52469.5246
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.06010.06010.98820.00000.9882
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
144.9587144.9587281.8443281.8443
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.01590.0159
3.5300e-3.5300e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
0.00000.00000.0000
144.8706144.8706281.4481281.4481
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.0000
144.8706144.8706281.4481281.4481
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04560.04560.00000.06090.0609
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
1.1600e-1.1600e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04450.0445
FugitiveFugitive
Page 25 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16890.16890.00000.06090.0609
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
1.2600e-1.2600e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.16770.1677
FugitiveFugitive
003003003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.4500e-1.4500e-2.9700e-2.9700e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.43540.43541.81011.8101
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.03640.03641.21881.2188
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.06010.06010.1808
236.4115236.5923
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Archit. Coating
3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
22
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
281.8443281.8443
1,546.2261,546.226
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.03760.03760.01590.0159
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
00
0.00000.00000.0000
281.4481281.4481
1,545.2861,545.286
Total CO2Total CO2
00
0.00000.0000
281.4481281.4481
1,545.2861,545.286
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.48660.48660.00000.06090.0609
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.01230.01230.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.47430.4743
FugitiveFugitive
Page 26 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00001.80181.80180.00000.06090.0609
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.01340.01340.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00001.78841.7884
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.01550.0155
2.9700e-2.9700e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00004.64394.64391.81011.8101
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.38860.38861.21881.2188
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.64060.64060.1808
236.4115236.5923
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Archit. Coating
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
22
CO2e
0.00000.0000
1,546.2261,546.226
N2O
CH4
0.00000.00000.03760.0376
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
00
0.00000.0000
1,545.2861,545.286
Total CO2
00
0.00000.0000
1,545.2861,545.286
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Total
0.00000.00000.48660.4866
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.00000.00000.01230.0123
Exhaust
PM2.5
0.00000.00000.47430.4743
Fugitive
Page 27 of 35
Total
PM10
0.00000.00001.80181.8018
PM10
0.00000.00000.01340.0134
Exhaust
lb/day
PM10
0.00000.00001.78841.7884
Fugitive
SO2
0.00000.00000.01550.0155
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CO
0.00000.00004.64394.6439
NOx
0.00000.00000.38860.3886
ROG
0.00000.00000.64060.6406
Total
VendorWorker
Hauling
Category
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3939
CO2e
47,972.6847,972.68
N2O
CH4
2.19532.1953
506,227706,812445,703707,488
Mitigated
3,413,9371,112,221
13,660,06520,552,452
Annual VMT
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
0505
47,917.8047,917.80
Total CO2
0505
47,917.8047,917.80
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
506,227706,812445,703707,488
3,413,9371,112,221
13,660,06520,552,452
Unmitigated
Annual VMT
Total
PM2.5
12.608312.6083
PM2.5
0.31320.3132
Exhaust
31.05
154.00160.00461.20357.84
PM2.5
4075.502817.72
8,057.31
12.295012.2950
Fugitive
Page 28 of 35
Sunday
Total
PM10
46.296546.2965
62.55
154.25187.50511.92601.44
3,773.252,873.528,164.43
Saturday
PM10
0.33730.3373
Exhaust
lb/day
Average Daily Trip Rate
PM10
45.959245.9592
Fugitive
145.75288.45192.00501.12528.08
4,026.752,368.808,050.95
Weekday
SO2
0.46810.4681
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CO
110.0422110.0422
NOx
45.991445.9914
Total
Hotel
Land Use
ROG
9.52339.5233
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
Regional Shopping Center
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
CategoryMitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Unmitigated
4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information
MH
0.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.000821
SBUS
0.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.000712
3344
434411
Pass-by
MCY
0.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.005285
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
11111920381835
UBUS
0.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.001817
Trip Purpose %
Diverted
OBUS
0.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.002613
86867737583854
Primary
HHD
0.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.033577
40.6040.6019.0019.0019.0019.0019.00
MHD
0.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.021166
H-O or C-NW
Trip %
LHD2
19.2019.2048.0072.5061.6069.0064.70
0.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.006332
H-S or C-C
Page 29 of 35
LHD1
0.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.014033
8.50
40.2040.2033.0019.4012.0016.30
H-W or C-W
MDV
0.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.116369
8.708.706.906.906.906.906.90
H-O or C-NW
LDT2
0.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.209971
5.905.908.408.408.408.408.40
Miles
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
H-S or C-C
LDT1
0.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.044216
14.7014.7016.6016.6016.6016.6016.60
LDA
0.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.543088
H-W or C-W
Hotel
Hotel
Land Use
Land Use
Restaurant)
Restaurant)
Quality Restaurant
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
General Office Building
High Turnover (Sit Down
High Turnover (Sit Down
Regional Shopping Center
Regional Shopping Center
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Historical Energy Use: N
4.4 Fleet Mix 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
77
CO2e
8,405.6388,405.638
N2O
0.15320.1532
CH4
0.16020.1602
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
22
8,355.9838,355.983
Total CO2
22
8,355.9838,355.983
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Total
0.52920.5292
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.52920.5292
Exhaust
PM2.5
Fugitive
Page 30 of 35
Total
PM10
0.52920.5292
PM10
0.52920.5292
Exhaust
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
SO2
0.04180.0418
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CO
4.25734.2573
NOx
6.74626.7462
ROG
0.76600.7660
CategoryMitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
NaturalGasNaturalGasUnmitigated
907
CO2e
29.7778
132.4486151.8884564.4782598.5658
4,234.9332,693.5468,405.638
003003004
N2O
0.07720.04910.01030.01090.1532
2.4100e-2.7700e-5.4000e-
003003004
CH4
0.08070.05130.01080.01140.1602
2.5200e-2.8900e-5.7000e-
lb/day
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
Total CO2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
003003003
Total
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
PM2.5
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
003003003
PM2.5
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
PM2.5
Fugitive
003003003
Total
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
Page 31 of 35
003003003
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
004004003003004
SO2
0.02110.01340.0418
6.6000e-7.5000e-2.8100e-2.9800e-1.5000e-
CO
0.04391.40330.10571.87430.39280.41650.02074.2573
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
NOx
0.10313.29780.12582.23140.46760.49590.02476.7463
003
ROG
0.01210.38590.01380.24550.05140.05450.7660
2.7100e-
s Use
kBTU/yr1119.1635784.31283.4222759.94769.725057.75251.616
NaturalGa
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated
High Turnover (Sit
907
CO2e
29.7778
132.4486151.8884564.4782598.5658
4,234.9332,693.5468,405.638
003003004
N2O
0.07720.04910.01030.01090.1532
2.4100e-2.7700e-5.4000e-
003003004
CH4
0.08070.05130.01080.01140.1602
2.5200e-2.8900e-5.7000e-
lb/day
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
Total CO2
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
003003003
Total
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
PM2.5
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
003003003
PM2.5
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
PM2.5
Fugitive
003003003
Total
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
Page 32 of 35
003003003
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
004004003003004
SO2
0.02110.01340.0418
6.6000e-7.5000e-2.8100e-2.9800e-1.5000e-
CO
0.04391.40330.10571.87430.39280.41650.02074.2573
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
NOx
0.10313.29780.12582.23140.46760.49590.02476.7463
003
ROG
0.01210.38590.01380.24550.05140.05450.7660
2.7100e-
s Use
kBTU/yr1.1191635.78431.2834222.75994.769725.05775
0.251616
NaturalGa
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
High Turnover (Sit
92925092
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
152.1542
18,259.1118,259.1118,106.9618,259.11
N2ON2O
0.33000.33000.33000.3300
CH4CH4
0.48740.48740.34500.14240.4874
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
50500050
0.00000.0000
148.5950
18,148.5918,148.5918,000.0018,148.59
Total CO2Total CO2
50500050
148.5950
18,148.5918,148.5918,000.0018,148.59
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
FugitiveFugitive
Page 33 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM10PM10
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
FugitiveFugitive
003
SO2SO2
0.09440.09440.09000.0944
4.3600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
6.0000
88.443088.443082.443088.4430
NOxNOx
0.9496
15.049615.049614.100015.0496
ROGROG
2.26701.65002.4766
30.502030.502024.108530.5020
Total
Hearth
Coating
Products
CategoryMitigated
Consumer
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Landscaping
SubCategoryArchitectural
6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated
5092
CO2e
0.00000.0000
152.1542
18,106.9618,259.11
N2O
0.33000.3300
Fuel Type
CH4
0.34500.14240.4874
lb/day
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
0050
0.00000.0000
148.5950
18,000.0018,148.59
Total CO2
Load Factor
0050
148.5950
18,000.0018,148.59
NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Horse Power
Total
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
Exhaust
Days/Year
PM2.5
Fugitive
Page 34 of 35
Total
PM10
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM10
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
Exhaust
Hours/Day
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
003
SO2
0.09000.0944
4.3600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Number
CO
6.0000
82.443088.4430
NOx
0.9496
14.100015.0496
ROG
2.26701.65002.4766
24.108530.5020
Equipment Type
Total
Hearth
Coating
Products
Consumer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Landscaping
SubCategoryArchitectural
6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated
7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fuel Type
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM
Fuel Type
Load Factor
Boiler Rating
Horse Power
Hours/Year
Heat Input/Year
Page 35 of 35
Hours/Day
Heat Input/Day
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
NumberNumber
Number
Equipment TypeEquipment Type
Equipment Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
BoilersUser Defined Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators 11.0 Vegetation
00000
72
2789
Population
8,000.00
45,000.0036,000.0072,600.0025,000.0056,000.00
975,000.00
Floor Surface Area
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
332028
1.030.831.670.181.561.29
25.66
0.006
Lot Acreage
Precipitation Freq (Days)Operational YearN2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
MetricRoom
1000sqft1000sqft1000sqft1000sqft
Dwelling UnitDwelling Unit
Page 1 of 44
0.029
2.2
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Size8.00
45.0036.0050.0025.0056.00
975.00
Wind Speed (m/s)CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Urban9Southern California Edison702.44
Hotel
Land Uses
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
Regional Shopping Center
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage1.2 Other Project Characteristics UrbanizationClimate ZoneUtility CompanyCO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.000.000.000.006.173.871.39
10.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0079.82
New Value
1.257.166.392.46
48.7514.7014.7014.7014.7014.7014.70
158.37
1,019.201,019.20
Default Value
Page 2 of 44
ST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TR
NumberWoodNumberWood
Column Name
WorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLength
FireplaceWoodMassFireplaceWoodMass
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Table Name
tblFireplacestblFireplacestblFireplacestblFireplaces
tblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTrips
tblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual
construction phase lengths.Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See
SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.Energy
Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.Water
Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
3.756.164.180.693.206.395.834.136.413.849.430.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
63.9910.7478.2757.6565.8062.64
8.196.075.861.055.956.596.658.171.251.25
94.3649.9772.1625.2411.0389.9542.7048.7548.7525.0025.00
131.84127.15999.60999.60
Page 3 of 44
ST_TRST_TRST_TR
SU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TR
WD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TR
NumberCatalyticNumberCatalytic
WoodstoveDayYearWoodstoveDayYear
NumberNoncatalyticNumberNoncatalytic
WoodstoveWoodMassWoodstoveWoodMass
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
tblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblV
ehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstoves
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.0 Emissions Summary
515
CO2e
44.8311
212.2661
1,421.6921,345.2291,421.692
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
003
CH4
0.06000.12150.11150.1215
7.8300e-
MT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
424
44.6355
210.7654
1,418.6551,342.4411,418.655
Total CO2
424
44.6355
210.7654
1,418.6551,342.4411,418.655
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Total
0.25420.36210.31950.01180.3621
PM2.5
003
PM2.5
0.07540.11030.09120.1103
Exhaust
5.9700e-
003
PM2.5
0.17880.25180.22830.2518
Fugitive
5.8700e-
Page 4 of 44
Total
PM10
0.49581.06830.94680.02851.0683
003
PM10
0.08170.11750.09710.1175
Exhaust6.3900e-
tons/yr
PM10
0.41410.95090.84970.02210.9509
Fugitive
003004
SO2
0.01550.01470.0155
2.3800e-5.0000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CO
1.15775.15464.76780.25575.1546
NOx
1.82344.02403.28500.13134.0240
ROG
0.17040.58650.51904.15924.1592
Year
2021202220232024
Maximum
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction
171
CO2e
0.00
44.8311
CO2e
212.2658
1,421.6921,345.2281,421.692
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
N20
0.00
003
CH4
0.06000.12150.11150.1215
CH40.00
7.8300e-
MT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
090
0.00
44.6354
210.7651
1,418.6551,342.4401,418.655
Total CO2
Total CO2
090
0.00
1.40911.33291.14991.14571.14151.02780.98680.9831
44.6354
210.7651
1,418.6551,342.4401,418.655
NBio- CO2
NBio-CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
0.00
Bio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Total
0.25420.36210.31950.01180.36210.00
PM2.5
Total
PM2.5
003
0.00
PM2.5
0.07540.11030.09120.1103
PM2.5
Exhaust
5.9700e-
Exhaust
003
0.00
PM2.5
0.17880.25180.22830.2518
PM2.5
Fugitive
5.8700e-
Fugitive
Page 5 of 44
Total
0.00
PM10
0.49581.06830.94680.02851.0683Total
1.40911.33291.14991.14571.14151.02780.98680.9831
PM10
003
0.00
PM10
0.08170.11750.09710.1175
PM10
Exhaust6.3900e-
Exhaust
tons/yr
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
0.00
PM10
0.41410.95090.84970.02210.9509
PM10
Fugitive
Fugitive
003004
SO2
0.00
SO2
0.01550.01470.0155
2.3800e-5.0000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
End Date
2-28-20225-31-20228-31-20222-28-20235-31-20238-31-2023
11-30-202111-30-2022
CO
CO
0.00
1.15775.15464.76780.25575.1546
NOx
0.00
NOx
1.82344.02403.28500.13134.0240
9-1-20213-1-20226-1-20229-1-20223-1-20236-1-2023
12-1-202112-1-2022
Start Date
ROG
0.00
ROG
0.17040.58650.51904.15924.1592
12345678
Quarter
Year
2021202220232024
Percent
Maximum
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.1 Overall Construction Mitigated Construction
32
51
CO2e
222.5835514.8354683.7567
3,913.2837,629.01612,963.47
003
N2O
0.04680.00000.00000.07550.1260
3.7400e-
CH4
0.02010.13030.34073.0183
12.281115.7904
MT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
26
19
220.9670207.8079585.8052
3,896.0737,620.49812,531.15
Total CO2
26
07
0.0000
0.97982.87571.61882.8757
220.9670556.6420
3,896.0737,620.49812,294.18
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.0000
29.1632
Bio- CO2
207.8079236.9712
Total
0.07140.09662.14340.00000.00002.3114
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.07140.09660.05390.00000.00000.2219
Exhaust
PM2.5
2.08952.0895
Fugitive
Page 6 of 44
Total
PM10
0.07140.09667.85590.00000.00008.0240
0.97982.87571.61882.8757
PM10
0.07140.09660.05800.00000.00000.2260
Exhaust
tons/yr
PM10
7.79797.7979
Fugitive
003003
SO2
0.08210.0914
1.6700e-7.6200e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Highest
2-29-20245-31-2024
11-30-2023
CO
0.7770
10.380419.183430.3407
NOx
0.29501.23127.99629.5223
9-1-20233-1-2024
12-1-2023
ROG
5.14370.13981.58576.8692
9
1011
Area
Total
Water
Waste
Mobile
Energy
Category
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational
0.00
CO2e
32
51
CO2e
222.5835514.8354683.7567
3,913.2837,629.01612,963.47
N20
0.00
003
N2O
0.04680.00000.00000.07550.1260
3.7400e-
0.00
CH4
CH4
0.02010.13030.34073.0183
12.281115.7904
MT/yr
0.00
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Total CO2
26
19
220.9670207.8079585.8052
3,896.0737,620.49812,531.15
Total CO2
0.00
NBio-CO2
26
07
0.0000
220.9670556.6420
3,896.0737,620.49812,294.18
NBio- CO2
0.00
Bio- CO2
0.00000.00000.0000
29.1632
Bio- CO2
207.8079236.9712
0.00
Total
PM2.5
Total
0.07140.09662.14340.00000.00002.3114
PM2.5
0.00
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
0.07140.09660.05390.00000.00000.2219
Exhaust
0.00
PM2.5
Fugitive
PM2.5
2.08952.0895
Fugitive
Page 7 of 44
0.00
Total
PM10
Total
PM10
0.07140.09667.85590.00000.00008.0240
0.00
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.07140.09660.05800.00000.00000.2260
Exhaust
0.00
PM10
tons/yr
Fugitive
PM10
7.79797.7979
Fugitive
0.00
SO2
003003
SO2
0.08210.0914
1.6700e-7.6200e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CO
0.00
CO
0.7770
10.380419.183430.3407
0.00
NOx
NOx
0.29501.23127.99629.5223
0.00
ROG
ROG
5.14370.13981.58576.8692
Area
Total
Water
Waste
Mobile
Energy
Percent
Category
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Phase Description
3020453535
500
Num Days
555555
Week
Num Days
End Date
10/12/202111/9/20211/11/202212/12/20231/30/20243/19/2024
Page 8 of 44
Start Date
9/1/202110/13/202111/10/20211/12/202212/13/20231/31/2024
Phase Type
sqft)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
Phase Name
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Phase
Number
123456 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped
Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5Acres of Paving: 0OffRoad Equipment
0.730.380.400.400.370.380.410.400.480.370.290.200.740.370.450.420.360.380.48
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Load Factor
819797898497468078
158247247158187247367231130132
Horse Power
8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.007.008.008.007.008.008.008.008.006.00
Usage Hours
1323421122131312221
Page 9 of 44
Amount
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Offroad Equipment Type
Concrete/Industrial SawsExcavatorsRubber Tired DozersRubber Tired DozersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesExcavatorsGradersRubber Tired DozersScrapersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesCranesForkliftsGenerator
SetsTractors/Loaders/BackhoesWeldersPaversPaving EquipmentRollersAir Compressors
Phase Name
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
DemolitionDemolitionDemolitionSite PreparationSite PreparationGradingGradingGradingGradingGradingBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding
ConstructionPavingPavingPavingArchitectural Coating Trips and VMT
CO2e
0.0000
51.360151.3601
Hauling
N2O
Vehicle Class
HHDTHHDTHHDTHHDTHHDTHHDT
0.00000.00000.0000
CH4
0.00000.01440.0144
Vendor
Vehicle Class
HDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_Mix
MT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.0000
51.001251.0012
Total CO2
Class
0.0000
51.001251.0012
Worker Vehicle
NBio- CO2
LD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_Mix
20.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.00
0.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Length
Hauling Trip
003
Total
0.02160.0291
PM2.5
6.906.906.906.906.906.90
7.5100e-
Length
Vendor Trip
PM2.5
0.00000.02160.0216
Exhaust
10.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.00
003003
PM2.5
Length
Fugitive
7.5100e-7.5100e-
Worker Trip
Page 10 of 44
0.000.000.000.000.00
Total
PM10
0.04960.02330.0729
458.00
Number
Hauling Trip
PM10
0.00000.02330.0233
Exhaust
0.000.000.000.000.00
143.00
tons/yr
Number
PM10
0.04960.0496
Vendor Trip
Fugitive
15.0018.0020.0015.00
801.00160.00
004004
SO2
5.8000e-5.8000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Number
Worker Trip
678961
CO
0.32350.3235
NOx
Count
0.47160.4716
Offroad Equipment
ROG
0.04750.0475
Total
Phase Name
CategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00001.52930.0000
17.486919.016151.360051.3600
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
003005003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.01440.0144
1.2100e-5.0000e-1.2600e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00001.52810.0000
17.456618.984751.001151.0011
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00001.52810.0000
17.456618.984751.001151.0011
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
003004003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.02160.0291
PM2.5PM2.5
1.2600e-4.6000e-1.7200e-7.5100e-
004005004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.02160.0216
ExhaustExhaust
1.8000e-1.0000e-1.9000e-
003004003003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.0000
FugitiveFugitive
1.0800e-4.5000e-1.5300e-7.5100e-7.5100e-
Page 11 of 44
003003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.04960.02330.0729
4.1300e-1.6900e-5.8200e-
004005004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.02330.0233
ExhaustExhaust
1.9000e-1.0000e-2.0000e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.04960.0496
FugitiveFugitive
3.9400e-1.6800e-5.6200e-
004005004004004
SO2SO2
0.0000
1.8000e-2.0000e-2.0000e-5.8000e-5.8000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003
0.01480.00000.02090.32350.3235
6.0900e-
004
NOxNOx
0.06340.00000.06390.47160.4716
5.3000e-
003004003
ROGROG
0.00000.04750.0475
1.9300e-7.2000e-2.6500e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00001.52930.0000
17.486919.016133.706133.7061
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
003005003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.01080.0108
1.2100e-5.0000e-1.2600e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00001.52810.0000
17.456618.984733.435733.4357
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00001.52810.0000
17.456618.984733.435733.4357
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
003004003
TotalTotal
0.00000.09930.01880.1181
PM2.5PM2.5
1.2600e-4.6000e-1.7200e-
004005004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.01880.0188
ExhaustExhaust
1.8000e-1.0000e-1.9000e-
003004003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.09930.0993
FugitiveFugitive
1.0800e-4.5000e-1.5300e-
Page 12 of 44
003003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.18070.02040.2011
4.1300e-1.6900e-5.8200e-
004005004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.02040.0204
ExhaustExhaust
1.9000e-1.0000e-2.0000e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.18070.1807
FugitiveFugitive
3.9400e-1.6800e-5.6200e-
004005004004004
SO2SO2
0.0000
1.8000e-2.0000e-2.0000e-3.8000e-3.8000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003
0.01480.00000.02090.21150.2115
6.0900e-
004
NOxNOx
0.06340.00000.06390.40500.4050
5.3000e-
003004003
ROGROG
0.00000.03890.0389
1.9300e-7.2000e-2.6500e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00001.22341.22340.0000
33.706033.7060
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.00000.01080.0108
4.0000e-4.0000e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.00001.22251.22250.0000
33.435733.4357
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00001.22251.22250.0000
33.435733.4357
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.09930.01880.1181
PM2.5PM2.5
3.7000e-3.7000e-
005005
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.01880.0188
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.09930.0993
FugitiveFugitive
3.6000e-3.6000e-
Page 13 of 44
003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.18070.02040.2011
1.3500e-1.3500e-
005005
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.02040.0204
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.18070.1807
FugitiveFugitive
1.3400e-1.3400e-
005005004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-3.8000e-3.8000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.21150.2115
4.8700e-4.8700e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.40500.4050
4.3000e-4.3000e-
004004
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.03890.0389
5.8000e-5.8000e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00001.22341.22340.0000
104.3776104.3776
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.00000.03350.0335
4.0000e-4.0000e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.00001.22251.22250.0000
103.5405103.5405
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00001.22251.22250.0000
103.5405103.5405
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.06930.03470.1040
PM2.5PM2.5
3.7000e-3.7000e-
005005
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.03470.0347
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.06930.0693
FugitiveFugitive
3.6000e-3.6000e-
Page 14 of 44
003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.17410.03770.2118
1.3500e-1.3500e-
005005
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.03770.0377
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.17410.1741
FugitiveFugitive
1.3400e-1.3400e-
005005003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-1.1800e-1.1800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.58670.5867
4.8700e-4.8700e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.88160.8816
4.3000e-4.3000e-
004004
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.07960.0796
5.8000e-5.8000e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00002.58282.58280.0000
104.3775104.3775
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.00000.03350.0335
8.0000e-8.0000e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.00002.58082.58080.0000
103.5403103.5403
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00002.58082.58080.0000
103.5403103.5403
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.06930.03470.1040
PM2.5PM2.5
7.8000e-7.8000e-
005005
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.03470.0347
ExhaustExhaust
2.0000e-2.0000e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.06930.0693
FugitiveFugitive
7.5000e-7.5000e-
Page 15 of 44
003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.17410.03770.2118
2.8600e-2.8600e-
005005
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.03770.0377
ExhaustExhaust
2.0000e-2.0000e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.17410.1741
FugitiveFugitive
2.8300e-2.8300e-
005005003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
3.0000e-3.0000e-1.1800e-1.1800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.00000.01030.01030.58670.5867
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.88160.8816
9.0000e-9.0000e-
003003
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.07960.0796
1.2200e-1.2200e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00002.58282.58280.0000
19.241419.2414
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
8.0000e-8.0000e-6.1700e-6.1700e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.00002.58082.58080.0000
19.087119.0871
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00002.58082.58080.0000
19.087119.0871
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.01800.0233
PM2.5PM2.5
7.8000e-7.8000e-5.2600e-
005005003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
2.0000e-2.0000e-5.2600e-5.2600e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.01800.0180
FugitiveFugitive
7.5000e-7.5000e-
Page 16 of 44
003003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.08070.0865
2.8600e-2.8600e-5.7200e-
005005003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
2.0000e-2.0000e-5.7200e-5.7200e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.08070.0807
FugitiveFugitive
2.8300e-2.8300e-
005005004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
3.0000e-3.0000e-2.2000e-2.2000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.00000.01030.01030.10170.1017
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.13600.1360
9.0000e-9.0000e-
003003
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.01270.0127
1.2200e-1.2200e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.45900.45900.0000
19.241419.2414
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-6.1700e-6.1700e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.00000.45870.45870.0000
19.087119.0871
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00000.45870.45870.0000
19.087119.0871
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.01800.0233
PM2.5PM2.5
1.4000e-1.4000e-5.2600e-
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
5.2600e-5.2600e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.01800.0180
FugitiveFugitive
1.4000e-1.4000e-
Page 17 of 44
004004003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.08070.0865
5.3000e-5.3000e-5.7200e-
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
5.7200e-5.7200e-
tons/yrtons/yr
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.08070.0807
FugitiveFugitive
5.2000e-5.2000e-
005005004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-2.2000e-2.2000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.10170.1017
1.7400e-1.7400e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.13600.1360
1.5000e-1.5000e-
004004
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.01270.0127
2.1000e-2.1000e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.45900.4590
294.8881294.8881
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.07020.0702
1.0000e-1.0000e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.00000.45870.4587
293.1324293.1324
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00000.45870.4587
293.1324293.1324
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.09630.0963
PM2.5PM2.5
1.4000e-1.4000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.09630.0963
ExhaustExhaust
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
1.4000e-1.4000e-
Page 18 of 44
004004
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.10230.1023
5.3000e-5.3000e-
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.10230.1023
ExhaustExhaust
tons/yrtons/yr
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
5.2000e-5.2000e-
005005003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-3.4100e-3.4100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00002.07002.0700
1.7400e-1.7400e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00001.97541.9754
1.5000e-1.5000e-
004004
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.21580.2158
2.1000e-2.1000e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
9
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
442.6435664.4604294.8877294.8877
1,107.103
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
CH4CH4
0.00000.02640.01870.04510.07020.0702
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
1
0.0000
441.9835663.9936293.1321293.1321
1,105.977
Total CO2Total CO2
1
0.0000
441.9835663.9936293.1321293.1321
1,105.977
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.03590.20650.24240.09630.0963
PM2.5PM2.5
003003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.09630.0963
ExhaustExhaust
3.0400e-5.7400e-8.7800e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.03290.20070.2336
FugitiveFugitive
Page 19 of 44
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.11710.76190.87900.10230.1023
003003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.10230.1023
ExhaustExhaust
3.1800e-6.2300e-9.4100e-
tons/yrtons/yr
PM10PM10
0.00000.11400.75570.8696
FugitiveFugitive
003003003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.0119
4.5500e-7.3500e-3.4100e-3.4100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.45802.52332.98122.07002.0700
NOxNOx
0.00001.69610.21641.91251.97541.9754
ROGROG
0.00000.05270.30510.35780.21580.2158
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
9
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
442.6435664.4604287.9814287.9814
1,107.103
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
CH4CH4
0.00000.02640.01870.04510.06810.0681
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
1
0.0000
441.9835663.9936286.2789286.2789
1,105.977
Total CO2Total CO2
1
0.0000
441.9835663.9936286.2789286.2789
1,105.977
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.03590.20650.24240.08130.0813
PM2.5PM2.5
003003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.08130.0813
ExhaustExhaust
3.0400e-5.7400e-8.7800e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.03290.20070.2336
FugitiveFugitive
Page 20 of 44
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.11710.76190.87900.08640.0864
003003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.08640.0864
ExhaustExhaust
3.1800e-6.2300e-9.4100e-
tons/yrtons/yr
PM10PM10
0.00000.11400.75570.8696
FugitiveFugitive
003003003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.0119
4.5500e-7.3500e-3.3300e-3.3300e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.45802.52332.98122.00612.0061
NOxNOx
0.00001.69610.21641.91251.77651.7765
ROGROG
0.00000.05270.30510.35780.19420.1942
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
0
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
418.5624624.9466287.9811287.9811
1,043.509
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
CH4CH4
0.00000.02280.01640.03920.06810.0681
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
4
0.0000
417.9930624.5363286.2785286.2785
1,042.529
Total CO2Total CO2
4
0.0000
417.9930624.5363286.2785286.2785
1,042.529
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.03350.20140.23490.08130.0813
PM2.5PM2.5
003003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.08130.0813
ExhaustExhaust
1.4000e-5.4500e-6.8500e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.03210.19600.2281
FugitiveFugitive
Page 21 of 44
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.11270.74360.85640.08640.0864
003003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.08640.0864
ExhaustExhaust
1.4600e-5.9100e-7.3700e-
tons/yrtons/yr
PM10PM10
0.00000.11130.73770.8490
FugitiveFugitive
003003003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.0112
4.3000e-6.9100e-3.3300e-3.3300e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.40112.26352.66462.00612.0061
NOxNOx
0.00001.25110.19101.44201.77651.7765
ROGROG
0.00000.03820.27950.31770.19420.1942
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
0
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
13.122713.1227
418.5624624.9466
1,043.509
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.02280.01640.03920.0000
4.2100e-4.2100e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
4
0.00000.0000
13.017513.0175
417.9930624.5363
1,042.529
Total CO2Total CO2
4
0.00000.0000
13.017513.0175
417.9930624.5363
1,042.529
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.03350.20140.23490.0000
PM2.5PM2.5
3.0500e-3.0500e-
003003003003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.4000e-5.4500e-6.8500e-3.0500e-3.0500e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.03210.19600.2281
FugitiveFugitive
Page 22 of 44
003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.11270.74360.85640.0000
3.3200e-3.3200e-
003003003003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.4600e-5.9100e-7.3700e-3.3200e-3.3200e-
tons/yrtons/yr
PM10PM10
0.00000.11130.73770.8490
FugitiveFugitive
003003004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.0112
4.3000e-6.9100e-1.5000e-1.5000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.40112.26352.66460.09480.0948
NOxNOx
0.00001.25110.19101.44200.06630.0663
003003
ROGROG
0.00000.03820.27950.31770.0000
6.7100e-6.7100e-
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.61600.61600.0000
13.122713.1227
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
2.0000e-2.0000e-4.2100e-4.2100e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.00000.61560.61560.0000
13.017513.0175
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00000.61560.61560.0000
13.017513.0175
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.0000
PM2.5PM2.5
2.0000e-2.0000e-3.0500e-3.0500e-
005005003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-3.0500e-3.0500e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
1.9000e-1.9000e-
Page 23 of 44
004004003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
7.3000e-7.3000e-3.3200e-3.3200e-
005005003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-3.3200e-3.3200e-
tons/yrtons/yr
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
7.3000e-7.3000e-
005005004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-1.5000e-1.5000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.09480.0948
2.2300e-2.2300e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.06630.0663
1.9000e-1.9000e-
004004003003
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.0000
2.8000e-2.8000e-6.7100e-6.7100e-
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.61600.61600.0000
22.207322.2073
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
2.0000e-2.0000e-7.1200e-7.1200e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.00000.61560.61560.0000
22.029222.0292
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00000.61560.61560.0000
22.029222.0292
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.0000
PM2.5PM2.5
2.0000e-2.0000e-4.7400e-4.7400e-
005005003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-4.7400e-4.7400e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
1.9000e-1.9000e-
Page 24 of 44
004004003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
7.3000e-7.3000e-5.1500e-5.1500e-
005005003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-5.1500e-5.1500e-
tons/yrtons/yr
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
7.3000e-7.3000e-
005005004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-2.5000e-2.5000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.16090.1609
2.2300e-2.2300e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.10480.1048
1.9000e-1.9000e-
004004
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.01090.00000.0109
2.8000e-2.8000e-
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00001.01001.01000.0000
22.207322.2073
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
3.0000e-3.0000e-7.1200e-7.1200e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.00001.00941.00940.0000
22.029222.0292
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00001.00941.00940.0000
22.029222.0292
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.0000
PM2.5PM2.5
3.4000e-3.4000e-4.7400e-4.7400e-
005005003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-4.7400e-4.7400e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
3.3000e-3.3000e-
Page 25 of 44
003003003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
1.2400e-1.2400e-5.1500e-5.1500e-
005005003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-5.1500e-5.1500e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
1.2300e-1.2300e-
005005004004
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-2.5000e-2.5000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.16090.1609
3.5100e-3.5100e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.10480.1048
2.9000e-2.9000e-
004004
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.01090.00000.0109
4.4000e-4.4000e-
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00001.01001.01000.00004.47454.4745
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
005005004004
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
3.0000e-3.0000e-2.5000e-2.5000e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.00001.00941.00940.00004.46824.4682
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00001.00941.00940.00004.46824.4682
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
004004003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.0000
PM2.5PM2.5
3.4000e-3.4000e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
005005003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
3.3000e-3.3000e-
Page 26 of 44
003003003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
1.2400e-1.2400e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
005005003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.0000e-1.0000e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
tons/yrtons/yr
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
1.2300e-1.2300e-
005005005005
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-5.0000e-5.0000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
003003
0.00000.00000.03170.0317
3.5100e-3.5100e-
004004
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.02130.0213
2.9000e-2.9000e-
004004003
ROGROG
0.00000.00004.13724.1404
4.4000e-4.4000e-3.1600e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Archit. Coating
3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.00004.47454.4745
17.139417.1394
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
004004004004
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.0000
4.3000e-4.3000e-2.5000e-2.5000e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.00000.00004.46824.4682
17.128717.1287
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.00000.00004.46824.4682
17.128717.1287
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
003003003003
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.0000
PM2.5PM2.5
5.7000e-5.7000e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
004004003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.5000e-1.5000e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.0000
FugitiveFugitive
5.5500e-5.5500e-
Page 27 of 44
003003
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.02110.02110.0000
1.0700e-1.0700e-
004004003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.0000
ExhaustExhaust
1.6000e-1.6000e-1.0700e-1.0700e-
tons/yrtons/yr
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.02090.0209
FugitiveFugitive
004004005005
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.9000e-1.9000e-5.0000e-5.0000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.00000.00000.05960.05960.03170.0317
003003
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.02130.0213
4.9300e-4.9300e-
003003003
ROGROG
0.00000.00004.13724.1404
7.4800e-7.4800e-3.1600e-
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Archit. Coating
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2e
0.00000.0000
17.139417.1394
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
004004
CH4
0.00000.0000
4.3000e-4.3000e-
MT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.0000
17.128717.1287
Total CO2
0.00000.0000
17.128717.1287
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
003003
Total
0.00000.0000
PM2.5
5.7000e-5.7000e-
004004
PM2.5
0.00000.0000
Exhaust
1.5000e-1.5000e-
003003
PM2.5
0.00000.0000
Fugitive
5.5500e-5.5500e-
Page 28 of 44
Total
PM10
0.00000.00000.02110.0211
004004
PM10
0.00000.0000
Exhaust
1.6000e-1.6000e-
tons/yr
PM10
0.00000.00000.02090.0209
Fugitive
004004
SO2
0.00000.0000
1.9000e-1.9000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CO
0.00000.00000.05960.0596
003003
NOx
0.00000.0000
4.9300e-4.9300e-
003003
ROG
0.00000.0000
7.4800e-7.4800e-
Total
VendorWorker
Hauling
Category
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
22
CO2e
7,629.0167,629.016
N2O
0.00000.0000
CH4
0.34070.3407
506,227706,812445,703707,488
Mitigated
3,413,9371,112,221
13,660,06520,552,452
Annual VMT
MT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
66
7,620.4987,620.498
Total CO2
66
7,620.4987,620.498
NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
506,227706,812445,703707,488
3,413,9371,112,221
13,660,06520,552,452
Unmitigated
Annual VMT
Total
2.14342.1434
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.05390.0539
Exhaust
31.05
154.00160.00461.20357.84
PM2.5
2.08952.0895
4075.502817.72
8,057.31
Fugitive
Page 29 of 44
Sunday
Total
PM10
7.85597.8559
62.55
154.25187.50511.92601.44
3,773.252,873.528,164.43
Saturday
PM10
0.05800.0580
Exhaust
tons/yr Average Daily Trip Rate
PM10
7.79797.7979
Fugitive
145.75288.45192.00501.12528.08
4,026.752,368.808,050.95
Weekday
SO2
0.08210.0821
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CO
19.183419.1834
NOx
7.99627.9962
Total
Hotel
Land Use
ROG
1.58571.5857
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
Regional Shopping Center
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
CategoryMitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Unmitigated
4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information
MH
0.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.000821
SBUS
0.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.000712
3344
434411
Pass-by
MCY
0.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.005285
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
11111920381835
UBUS
0.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.001817
Trip Purpose %
Diverted
OBUS
0.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.002613
86867737583854
Primary
HHD
0.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.033577
40.6040.6019.0019.0019.0019.0019.00
MHD
0.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.021166
H-O or C-NW
Trip %
LHD2
19.2019.2048.0072.5061.6069.0064.70
0.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.006332
H-S or C-C
Page 30 of 44
LHD1
0.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.014033
8.50
40.2040.2033.0019.4012.0016.30
H-W or C-W
MDV
0.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.116369
8.708.706.906.906.906.906.90
H-O or C-NW
LDT2
0.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.209971
5.905.908.408.408.408.408.40
Miles
H-S or C-C
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
LDT1
0.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.044216
14.7014.7016.6016.6016.6016.6016.60
LDA
0.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.543088
H-W or C-W
Hotel
Hotel
Land Use
Land Use
Restaurant)
Restaurant)
Quality Restaurant
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
General Office Building
High Turnover (Sit Down
High Turnover (Sit Down
Regional Shopping Center
Regional Shopping Center
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Historical Energy Use: N
4.4 Fleet Mix 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
6688
CO2e
2,521.6352,521.6351,391.6471,391.647
N2O
0.02150.02150.02540.0254
CH4
0.10370.10370.02650.0265
MT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
5577
2,512.6462,512.6461,383.4261,383.426
Total CO2
5577
2,512.6462,512.6461,383.4261,383.426
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Total
0.00000.00000.09660.0966
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.00000.00000.09660.0966
Exhaust
PM2.5
Fugitive
Page 31 of 44
Total
PM10
0.00000.00000.09660.0966
PM10
0.00000.00000.09660.0966
Exhaust
tons/yr
PM10
Fugitive
003003
SO2
7.6200e-7.6200e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CO
0.77700.7770
NOx
1.23121.2312
ROG
0.13980.1398
CategoryMitigatedMitigated
ElectricityElectricity
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
UnmitigatedNaturalGasNaturalGasUnmitigated
8
CO2e
4.9301
21.928425.146893.455799.0993
701.1408445.9468
1,391.647
004004003003003005
N2O
0.01280.0254
4.0000e-4.6000e-8.1300e-1.7000e-1.8100e-9.0000e-
004004003003003005
CH4
0.01340.0265
4.2000e-4.8000e-8.5000e-1.7800e-1.8900e-9.0000e-
MT/yr
8
4.9009
21.798824.998392.903698.5139
696.9989443.3124
1,383.426
Total CO2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
8
4.9009
21.798824.998392.903698.5139
696.9989443.3124
1,383.426
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
003003003003004
Total
0.04870.03100.0966
PM2.5
1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
003003003003004
PM2.5
0.04870.03100.0966
Exhaust1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
PM2.5
Fugitive
003003003003004
Total
PM10
0.04870.03100.0966
1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
Page 32 of 44
003003003003004
PM10
0.04870.03100.0966
Exhaust
1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
tons/yr
PM10
Fugitive
004003004003004004005003
SO2
1.2000e-3.8400e-1.4000e-2.4400e-5.1000e-5.4000e-3.0000e-7.6200e-
CO
003003
0.25610.01930.34210.07170.07600.7770
8.0100e-3.7800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
003
NOx
0.01880.60180.02300.40720.08530.09051.2312
4.5000e-
003003003003004
ROG
0.07040.04480.1398
2.2000e-2.5300e-9.3900e-9.9500e-5.0000e-
+007+006+006+006
s Use
91840
408494468450
kBTU/yr
1.30613e8.30736e1.74095e1.84608e
NaturalGa
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated
High Turnover (Sit
8
CO2e
4.9301
21.928425.146893.455799.0993
701.1408445.9468
1,391.647
004004003003003005
N2O
0.01280.0254
4.0000e-4.6000e-8.1300e-1.7000e-1.8100e-9.0000e-
004004003003003005
CH4
0.01340.0265
4.2000e-4.8000e-8.5000e-1.7800e-1.8900e-9.0000e-
MT/yr
8
4.9009
21.798824.998392.903698.5139
696.9989443.3124
1,383.426
Total CO2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
8
4.9009
21.798824.998392.903698.5139
696.9989443.3124
1,383.426
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
003003003003004
Total
0.04870.03100.0966
PM2.5
1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
003003003003004
PM2.5
0.04870.03100.0966
Exhaust1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
PM2.5
Fugitive
003003003003004
Total
PM10
0.04870.03100.0966
1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
Page 33 of 44
003003003003004
PM10
0.04870.03100.0966
Exhaust
1.5200e-1.7500e-6.4900e-6.8800e-3.4000e-
tons/yr
PM10
Fugitive
004003004003004004005003
SO2
1.2000e-3.8400e-1.4000e-2.4400e-5.1000e-5.4000e-3.0000e-7.6200e-
CO
003003
0.25610.01930.34210.07170.07600.7770
8.0100e-3.7800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
003
NOx
0.01880.60180.02300.40720.08530.09051.2312
4.5000e-
003003003003004
ROG
0.07040.04480.1398
2.2000e-2.5300e-9.3900e-9.9500e-5.0000e-
+007+006+006+006
s Use
91840
408494468450
kBTU/yr
1.30613e8.30736e1.74095e1.84608e
NaturalGa
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated
High Turnover (Sit
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Page 34 of 44
96
CO2e
33.8978
186.9165508.1135175.9672112.9141241.7395
1,262.0862,521.635
004003003003004003
N2O
0.01070.0215
2.9000e-1.5900e-4.3200e-1.5000e-9.6000e-2.0600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
MT/yr
003003003003003
CH4
0.05190.02090.1037
1.3900e-7.6900e-7.2400e-4.6500e-9.9400e-
95
33.7770
186.2502506.3022175.3399112.5116240.8778
1,257.5872,512.646
Total CO2
Use
+006+006
kWh/yr
106010584550550308353120756000
3.94697e1.58904e
Electricity
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated
High Turnover (Sit
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Page 35 of 44
96
CO2e
33.8978
186.9165508.1135175.9672112.9141241.7395
1,262.0862,521.635
004003003003004003
N2O
0.01070.0215
2.9000e-1.5900e-4.3200e-1.5000e-9.6000e-2.0600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
MT/yr
003003003003003
CH4
0.05190.02090.1037
1.3900e-7.6900e-7.2400e-4.6500e-9.9400e-
95
33.7770
186.2502506.3022175.3399112.5116240.8778
1,257.5872,512.646
Total CO2
Use
+006+006
kWh/yr
106010584550550308353120756000
3.94697e1.58904e
Electricity
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
High Turnover (Sit
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
17.2540
222.5835222.5835205.3295222.5835
003003003003
N2ON2O
0.00000.00000.0000
3.7400e-3.7400e-3.7400e-3.7400e-
003
CH4CH4
0.02010.02010.00000.00000.01610.0201
3.9100e-
MT/yrMT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.0000
16.8504
220.9670220.9670204.1166220.9670
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.0000
16.8504
220.9670220.9670204.1166220.9670
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.07140.07140.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.07140.07140.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
FugitiveFugitive
Page 36 of 44
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.07140.07140.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
PM10PM10
0.07140.07140.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
ExhaustExhaust
tons/yrtons/yr
PM10PM10
FugitiveFugitive
003003003004003
SO2SO2
1.6700e-1.6700e-1.1200e-5.4000e-1.6600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
COCO
0.0750
10.380410.380410.305410.3804
NOxNOx
0.29500.29500.17630.11870.2950
ROGROG
5.14375.14370.41374.39980.02060.30965.1437
Total
Hearth
Coating
Products
CategoryMitigated
Consumer
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Landscaping
SubCategoryArchitectural
6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated
CO2e
0.00000.0000
17.2540
205.3295222.5835
003003
N2O
0.00000.00000.0000
3.7400e-3.7400e-
003
CH4
0.00000.00000.01610.0201
3.9100e-
MT/yr
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
0.00000.0000
16.8504
204.1166220.9670
Total CO2
0.00000.0000
16.8504
204.1166220.9670
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Total
0.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
Exhaust
PM2.5
Fugitive
Page 37 of 44
Total
PM10
0.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
PM10
0.00000.00000.01430.05720.0714
Exhaust
tons/yr
PM10
Fugitive
003004003
SO2
1.1200e-5.4000e-1.6600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CO
0.0750
10.305410.3804
NOx
0.17630.11870.2950
ROG
0.41374.39980.02060.30965.1437
Total
Hearth
Coating
Products
Consumer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Landscaping
SubCategoryArchitectural
6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated
7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Page 38 of 44
CO2e
683.7567683.7567
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
N2O
0.07550.0755
MT/yr
CH4
3.01833.0183
585.8052585.8052
Total CO2
CategoryMitigated
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Page 39 of 44
CO2e
7.5079
12.647161.601962.848213.966331.9490
493.2363683.7567
003003003003003003
N2O
0.05230.0755
1.3400e-6.5900e-8.8200e-1.0300e-1.9600e-3.4200e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
MT/yr
CH4
0.05352.08670.26270.35800.04160.07960.13633.0183
6.1633
10.909553.071951.270211.393427.5250
425.4719585.8052
Total CO2
Mgal
1.0268840.04854.902012.54236
door Use
0.6974820.1409270.154996
1.62885 / 63.5252 / 7.99802 / 10.9272 / 1.26834 / 2.42827 / 4.14806 /
Indoor/Out
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low
Shopping Center
7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Down Restaurant)
High Turnover (Sit
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Page 40 of 44
CO2e
7.5079
12.647161.601962.848213.966331.9490
493.2363683.7567
003003003003003003
N2O
0.05230.0755
1.3400e-6.5900e-8.8200e-1.0300e-1.9600e-3.4200e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
MT/yr
CH4
0.05352.08670.26270.35800.04160.07960.13633.0183
6.1633
10.909553.071951.270211.393427.5250
425.4719585.8052
Total CO2
Mgal
1.0268840.04854.902012.54236
door Use
0.6974820.1409270.154996
1.62885 / 63.5252 / 7.99802 / 10.9272 / 1.26834 / 2.42827 / 4.14806 /
Indoor/Out
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low
Shopping Center
7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Down Restaurant)
8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
High Turnover (Sit
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Page 41 of 44
CO2e
514.8354514.8354
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
N2O
0.00000.0000
MT/yr
CH4
12.281112.2811
207.8079207.8079
Total CO2
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Unmitigated
Category/Year
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Page 42 of 44
CO2e
5.78343.6712
21.046413.769429.5706
225.5513215.4430514.8354
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
MT/yr
CH4
0.13805.38040.50215.13930.32850.08760.7054
12.2811
2.33448.49525.55791.4818
91.041586.961311.9359
207.8079
Total CO2
7.3
tons11.558.8
448.541.85428.427.38
Waste
Disposed
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low
Shopping Center
8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Down Restaurant)
High Turnover (Sit
Fuel Type
Fuel Type
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Load Factor
Load Factor
Horse Power
Horse Power
Days/Year
Hours/Year
Page 43 of 44
Hours/Day
Hours/Day
CO2e
5.78343.6712
21.046413.769429.5706
225.5513215.4430514.8354
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Number
Number
MT/yr
CH4
0.13805.38040.50215.13930.32850.08760.7054
12.2811
2.33448.49525.55791.4818
91.041586.961311.9359
207.8079
Total CO2
7.3
tons11.558.8
448.541.85428.427.38
Waste
Disposed
Equipment Type
Equipment Type
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low
Shopping Center
8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated Down Restaurant)Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
9.0 Operational Offroad10.0 Stationary Equipment
High Turnover (Sit
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM
Fuel Type
Boiler Rating
Heat Input/Year
Page 44 of 44
Heat Input/Day
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Number
Number
Equipment Type
Equipment Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
BoilersUser Defined Equipment
11.0 Vegetation
00000
72
2789
Population
8,000.00
45,000.0036,000.0072,600.0025,000.0056,000.00
975,000.00
Floor Surface Area
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
332028
1.030.831.670.181.561.29
25.66
0.006
Lot Acreage
Precipitation Freq (Days)Operational YearN2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
MetricRoom
1000sqft1000sqft1000sqft1000sqft
Dwelling UnitDwelling Unit
Page 1 of 35
0.029
2.2
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Size8.00
45.0036.0050.0025.0056.00
975.00
Wind Speed (m/s)CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Urban9Southern California Edison702.44
Hotel
Land Uses
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
Regional Shopping Center
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage1.2 Other Project Characteristics UrbanizationClimate ZoneUtility CompanyCO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
0.000.000.000.006.173.871.39
10.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0079.82
New Value
1.257.166.392.46
48.7514.7014.7014.7014.7014.7014.70
158.37
1,019.201,019.20
Default Value
Page 2 of 35
ST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TR
NumberWoodNumberWood
Column Name
WorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLength
FireplaceWoodMassFireplaceWoodMass
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Table Name
tblFireplacestblFireplacestblFireplacestblFireplaces
tblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTrips
tblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual
construction phase lengths.Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See
SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.Energy
Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.Water
Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
3.756.164.180.693.206.395.834.136.413.849.430.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
63.9910.7478.2757.6565.8062.64
8.196.075.861.055.956.596.658.171.251.25
94.3649.9772.1625.2411.0389.9542.7048.7548.7525.0025.00
131.84127.15999.60999.60
Page 3 of 35
ST_TRST_TRST_TR
SU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TR
WD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TR
NumberCatalyticNumberCatalytic
WoodstoveDayYearWoodstoveDayYear
NumberNoncatalyticNumberNoncatalytic
WoodstoveWoodMassWoodstoveWoodMass
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
tblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblV
ehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstoves
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.0 Emissions Summary
96
071507
CO2e
6,212.10312,518.5712,174.462,331.09512,518.57
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
CH4
1.94751.94850.95890.71661.9485
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
68
039003
6,163.41612,493.4412,150.482,313.18012,493.44
Total CO2
68
039003
6,163.41612,493.4412,150.482,313.18012,493.44
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Total
5.14212.59350.4621
PM2.5
11.849011.8490
PM2.5
1.88201.50520.71360.43191.8820
Exhaust
PM2.5
9.96703.63691.87990.32299.9670
Fugitive
Page 4 of 35
Total
PM10
7.76791.2875
20.248810.461620.2488
PM10
2.04561.63610.75920.46942.0456
Exhaust
lb/day
PM10
8.82557.00881.2171
18.203218.2032
Fugitive
SO2
0.06360.12400.12060.02390.1240
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CO
31.449440.877638.745714.964240.8776
NOx
9.5478
46.441538.881125.765846.4415
ROG
4.25614.54414.1534
237.0219237.0219
Year
2021202220232024
Maximum
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)Unmitigated Construction
95
071507
CO2e
0.00
CO2e
6,212.10312,518.5712,174.462,331.09512,518.57
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
N20
0.00
CH4
1.94751.94850.95890.71661.9485
CH40.00
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
68
039003
0.00
6,163.41612,493.4412,150.482,313.18012,493.44
Total CO2
Total CO2
68
039003
0.00
6,163.41612,493.4412,150.482,313.18012,493.44
NBio- CO2
NBio-CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
0.00
Bio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Total
5.14212.59350.46210.00
PM2.5
Total
11.849011.8490
PM2.5
0.00
PM2.5
1.88201.50520.71360.43191.8820
PM2.5
Exhaust
Exhaust
0.00
PM2.5
9.96703.63691.87990.32299.9670
PM2.5
Fugitive
Fugitive
Page 5 of 35
Total
0.00
PM10
7.76791.2875Total
PM10
20.248810.461620.2488
0.00
PM10
2.04561.63610.75920.46942.0456
PM10
Exhaust
Exhaust
lb/day
0.00
PM10
8.82557.00881.2171
PM10
18.203218.2032
Fugitive
Fugitive
SO2
0.00
SO2
0.06360.12400.12060.02390.1240
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CO
CO
0.00
31.449440.877638.745714.964240.8776
NOx
0.00
NOx
9.5478
46.441538.881125.765846.4415
ROG
0.00
ROG
4.25614.54414.1534
237.0219237.0219
Year
2021202220232024
Percent
Maximum
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)Mitigated Construction
77
920886920886
CO2eCO2e
18,259.118,405.63850,361.1277,025.8718,259.118,405.63850,361.1277,025.87
N2ON2O
0.33000.15320.48320.33000.15320.4832
CH4CH4
0.48740.16022.18072.82820.48740.16022.18072.8282
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
22
503416503416
18,148.598,355.98350,306.6076,811.1818,148.598,355.98350,306.6076,811.18
Total CO2Total CO2
22
503416503416
18,148.598,355.98350,306.6076,811.1818,148.598,355.98350,306.6076,811.18
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
1.59740.52921.59740.5292
PM2.5PM2.5
12.607014.733612.607014.7336
PM2.5PM2.5
1.59740.52920.31192.43851.59740.52920.31192.4385
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
12.295012.295012.295012.2950
FugitiveFugitive
Page 6 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
1.59740.52921.59740.5292
46.295148.421746.295148.4217
PM10PM10
1.59740.52920.33602.46261.59740.52920.33602.4626
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
45.959245.959245.959245.9592
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.09440.04180.49170.62780.09440.04180.49170.6278
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
4.25734.2573
88.443088.4430
114.8495207.5497114.8495207.5497
NOxNOx
6.74626.7462
15.049645.430467.226215.049645.430467.2262
ROGROG
0.76609.84890.76609.8489
30.502041.116830.502041.1168
AreaArea
TotalTotal
MobileMobile
EnergyEnergy
CategoryCategory
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated OperationalMitigated Operational
0.00
CO2e
N20
0.00
0.00
CH4
0.00
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Total CO2
Phase Description
0.00
NBio-CO2
3020453535
500
0.00
Bio- CO2
Num Days
555555
0.00
Total
PM2.5
Week
Num Days
0.00
PM2.5
Exhaust
0.00
End Date
PM2.5
Fugitive
10/12/202111/9/20211/11/202212/12/20231/30/20243/19/2024
Page 7 of 35
0.00
Total
PM10
Start Date
0.00
PM10
9/1/202110/13/202111/10/20211/12/202212/13/20231/31/2024
Exhaust
0.00
PM10
Fugitive
0.00
SO2
Phase Type
sqft)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CO
0.00
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
0.00
NOx
0.00
ROG
Phase Name
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
Percent
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Phase
Number
3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase 123456 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400;
Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5Acres of Paving: 0OffRoad Equipment
0.730.380.400.400.370.380.410.400.480.370.290.200.740.370.450.420.360.380.48
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Load Factor
819797898497468078
158247247158187247367231130132
Horse Power
8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.007.008.008.007.008.008.008.008.006.00
Usage Hours
1323421122131312221
Page 8 of 35
Amount
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Offroad Equipment Type
Concrete/Industrial SawsExcavatorsRubber Tired DozersRubber Tired DozersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesExcavatorsGradersRubber Tired DozersScrapersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesCranesForkliftsGenerator
SetsTractors/Loaders/BackhoesWeldersPaversPaving EquipmentRollersAir Compressors
Phase Name
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
DemolitionDemolitionDemolitionSite PreparationSite PreparationGradingGradingGradingGradingGradingBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding
ConstructionPavingPavingPavingArchitectural Coating Trips and VMT
44
CO2e
0.0000
3,774.3173,774.317
Hauling
N2O
Vehicle Class
HHDTHHDTHHDTHHDTHHDTHHDT
CH4
1.05491.0549
Vendor
Vehicle Class
HDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_Mix
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
99
0.0000
3,747.9443,747.944
Total CO2
Class
99
Worker Vehicle
3,747.9443,747.944
NBio- CO2
LD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_Mix
20.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.00
Bio- CO2
Length
Hauling Trip
Total
0.50081.44111.9419
PM2.5
6.906.906.906.906.906.90
Length
Vendor Trip
PM2.5
0.00001.44111.4411
Exhaust
10.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.00
PM2.5
0.50080.5008
Length
Fugitive
Page 9 of 35
Worker Trip
0.000.000.000.000.00
Total
PM10
3.30741.55134.8588
458.00
Number
Hauling Trip
PM10
0.00001.55131.5513
Exhaust
0.000.000.000.000.00
lb/day
143.00
Number
PM10
3.30743.3074
Vendor Trip
Fugitive
15.0018.0020.0015.00
801.00160.00
SO2
0.03880.0388
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Number
Worker Trip
678961
CO
21.565021.5650
NOx
Count
31.440731.4407
Offroad Equipment
ROG
3.16513.1651
Total
Phase Name
CategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
7544
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
117.3678
1,294.4331,411.8013,774.3173,774.317
N2ON2O
003
CH4CH4
0.08770.00000.09121.05491.0549
3.5200e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
3299
0.00000.0000
117.2799
1,292.2411,409.5213,747.9443,747.944
Total CO2Total CO2
3299
0.0000
117.2799
1,292.2411,409.5213,747.9443,747.944
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.08520.00000.03110.11630.50081.44111.9419
PM2.5PM2.5
004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.01200.00000.01290.00001.44111.4411
ExhaustExhaust
8.8000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.07320.00000.03030.10340.50080.5008
FugitiveFugitive
Page 10 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.27950.00000.11510.39463.30741.55134.8588
004
PM10PM10
0.01260.00000.01350.00001.55131.5513
ExhaustExhaust
9.5000e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.26690.00000.11410.38103.30743.3074
FugitiveFugitive
003
SO2SO2
0.01190.00000.01310.03880.0388
1.1800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.96020.00000.42821.3884
21.565021.5650
NOxNOx
4.09520.00000.03134.1265
31.440731.4407
ROGROG
0.12730.00000.04870.17603.16513.1651
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
7533
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
117.3678
1,294.4331,411.8013,715.4573,715.457
N2ON2O
003
CH4CH4
0.08770.00000.09121.19201.1920
3.5200e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
3299
0.00000.0000
117.2799
1,292.2411,409.5213,685.6563,685.656
Total CO2Total CO2
3299
0.0000
117.2799
1,292.2411,409.5213,685.6563,685.656
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.08520.00000.03110.11639.93071.8809
PM2.5PM2.5
11.8116
004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.01200.00000.01290.00001.88091.8809
ExhaustExhaust
8.8000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.07320.00000.03030.10349.93079.9307
FugitiveFugitive
Page 11 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.27950.00000.11510.39462.0445
18.066320.1107
004
PM10PM10
0.01260.00000.01350.00002.04452.0445
ExhaustExhaust
9.5000e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.26690.00000.11410.3810
18.066318.0663
FugitiveFugitive
003
SO2SO2
0.01190.00000.01310.03800.0380
1.1800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.96020.00000.42821.3884
21.154321.1543
NOxNOx
4.09520.00000.03134.1265
40.497140.4971
ROGROG
0.12730.00000.04870.17603.88823.8882
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
140.8414140.8414
3,715.4573,715.457
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.19201.1920
4.2200e-4.2200e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
99
0.00000.00000.0000
140.7359140.7359
3,685.6563,685.656
Total CO2Total CO2
99
0.00000.0000
140.7359140.7359
3,685.6563,685.656
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.03740.03749.93071.8809
PM2.5PM2.5
11.8116
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.88091.8809
ExhaustExhaust
1.0500e-1.0500e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.03630.03639.93079.9307
FugitiveFugitive
Page 12 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.13810.13812.0445
18.066320.1107
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00002.04452.0445
ExhaustExhaust
1.1400e-1.1400e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.13690.1369
18.066318.0663
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.03800.0380
1.4100e-1.4100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.51390.5139
21.154321.1543
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.03750.0375
40.497140.4971
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.05840.05843.88823.8882
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
44
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
140.8414140.8414
6,055.6136,055.613
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94281.9428
4.2200e-4.2200e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
44
0.00000.00000.0000
140.7359140.7359
6,007.0436,007.043
Total CO2Total CO2
44
0.00000.0000
140.7359140.7359
6,007.0436,007.043
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.03740.03743.59651.82655.4230
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.82651.8265
ExhaustExhaust
1.0500e-1.0500e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.03630.03633.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 13 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.13810.13818.67331.9853
10.6587
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.98531.9853
ExhaustExhaust
1.1400e-1.1400e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.13690.13698.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06200.0620
1.4100e-1.4100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.51390.5139
30.878530.8785
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.03750.0375
46.399846.3998
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.05840.05844.19124.1912
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
44
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
156.4904156.4904
6,055.6136,055.613
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94281.9428
4.6900e-4.6900e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
44
0.00000.00000.0000
156.3732156.3732
6,007.0436,007.043
Total CO2Total CO2
44
0.00000.0000
156.3732156.3732
6,007.0436,007.043
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04150.04153.59651.82655.4230
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.82651.8265
ExhaustExhaust
1.1700e-1.1700e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04040.04043.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 14 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15340.15348.67331.9853
10.6587
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.98531.9853
ExhaustExhaust
1.2700e-1.2700e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15210.15218.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06200.0620
1.5700e-1.5700e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.57100.5710
30.878530.8785
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.04170.0417
46.399846.3998
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.06490.06494.19124.1912
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
88
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
156.4904156.4904
6,060.0156,060.015
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94421.9442
4.6900e-4.6900e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
55
0.00000.00000.0000
156.3732156.3732
6,011.4106,011.410
Total CO2Total CO2
55
0.00000.0000
156.3732156.3732
6,011.4106,011.410
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04150.04153.59651.50415.1006
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.50411.5041
ExhaustExhaust
1.1700e-1.1700e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04040.04043.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 15 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15340.15348.67331.6349
10.3082
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.63491.6349
ExhaustExhaust
1.2700e-1.2700e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15210.15218.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06210.0621
1.5700e-1.5700e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.57100.5710
29.041529.0415
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.04170.0417
38.843538.8435
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.06490.06493.62483.6248
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
88
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
150.9813150.9813
6,060.0156,060.015
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94421.9442
4.2400e-4.2400e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
55
0.00000.00000.0000
150.8754150.8754
6,011.4106,011.410
Total CO2Total CO2
55
0.00000.0000
150.8754150.8754
6,011.4106,011.410
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04150.04153.59651.50415.1006
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.50411.5041
ExhaustExhaust
1.1300e-1.1300e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04040.04043.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 16 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15340.15348.67331.6349
10.3082
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.63491.6349
ExhaustExhaust
1.2300e-1.2300e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15210.15218.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06210.0621
1.5100e-1.5100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.52630.5263
29.041529.0415
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.03760.0376
38.843538.8435
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.06070.06073.62483.6248
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
22
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
150.9813150.9813
2,569.6322,569.632
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.61200.6120
4.2400e-4.2400e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
66
0.00000.0000
150.8754150.8754
2,554.3332,554.333
Total CO2Total CO2
66
0.00000.0000
150.8754150.8754
2,554.3332,554.333
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04150.04150.76120.7612
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.76120.7612
ExhaustExhaust
1.1300e-1.1300e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04040.0404
FugitiveFugitive
Page 17 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15340.15340.80900.8090
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.80900.8090
ExhaustExhaust
1.2300e-1.2300e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15210.1521
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02690.0269
1.5100e-1.5100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.52630.5263
16.363416.3634
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.03760.0376
15.615615.6156
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.06070.06071.70621.7062
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
40422
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
3,902.1386,046.8009,948.9382,569.6322,569.632
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.22360.16970.39330.61200.6120
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
25766
0.0000
3,896.5486,042.5589,939.1062,554.3332,554.333
Total CO2Total CO2
25766
0.0000
3,896.5486,042.5589,939.1062,554.3332,554.333
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.28731.66171.94900.76120.7612
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.02370.04540.06910.76120.7612
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26361.61631.8799
FugitiveFugitive
Page 18 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.94046.14257.08280.80900.8090
PM10PM10
0.00000.02480.04930.07410.80900.8090
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91556.09327.0087
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03640.06070.09710.02690.0269
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00003.4341
21.080124.514216.363416.3634
NOxNOx
0.00001.5074
13.203214.710615.615615.6156
ROGROG
0.00000.40792.42992.83781.70621.7062
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
40411
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
3,902.1386,046.8009,948.9382,570.4062,570.406
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.22360.16970.39330.60790.6079
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
25799
0.0000
3,896.5486,042.5589,939.1062,555.2092,555.209
Total CO2Total CO2
25799
0.0000
3,896.5486,042.5589,939.1062,555.2092,555.209
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.28731.66171.94900.65840.6584
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.02370.04540.06910.65840.6584
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26361.61631.8799
FugitiveFugitive
Page 19 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.94046.14257.08280.69970.6997
PM10PM10
0.00000.02480.04930.07410.69970.6997
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91556.09327.0087
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03640.06070.09710.02690.0269
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00003.4341
21.080124.514216.244016.2440
NOxNOx
0.00001.5074
13.203214.710614.384914.3849
ROGROG
0.00000.40792.42992.83781.57281.5728
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
04411
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
3,778.8305,825.2259,604.0552,570.4062,570.406
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.19820.15290.35110.60790.6079
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
28099
0.0000
3,773.8765,821.4029,595.2792,555.2092,555.209
Total CO2Total CO2
28099
0.0000
3,773.8765,821.4029,595.2792,555.2092,555.209
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.27471.66041.93500.65840.6584
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.01110.04410.05520.65840.6584
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26361.61631.8799
FugitiveFugitive
Page 20 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.92716.14117.06820.69970.6997
PM10PM10
0.00000.01160.04790.05950.69970.6997
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91566.09327.0088
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03520.05840.09360.02690.0269
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00003.1014
19.400222.501716.244016.2440
NOxNOx
0.00001.3628
10.018111.380914.384914.3849
ROGROG
0.00000.30272.27802.58071.57281.5728
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
04466
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
3,778.8305,825.2259,604.0552,225.4332,225.433
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.19820.15290.35110.71400.7140
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
28011
0.00000.0000
3,773.8765,821.4029,595.2792,207.5842,207.584
Total CO2Total CO2
28011
0.0000
3,773.8765,821.4029,595.2792,207.5842,207.584
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.27471.66041.93500.46940.00000.4694
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.01110.04410.05520.46940.00000.4694
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26361.61631.8799
FugitiveFugitive
Page 21 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.92716.14117.06820.51020.00000.5102
PM10PM10
0.00000.01160.04790.05950.51020.00000.5102
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91566.09327.0088
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03520.05840.09360.02280.0228
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00003.1014
19.400222.501714.584214.5842
NOxNOx
0.00001.3628
10.018111.380910.191710.1917
ROGROG
0.00000.30272.27802.58071.03270.00001.0327
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
66
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
109.0866109.0866
2,225.4332,225.433
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.71400.7140
2.8600e-2.8600e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
11
0.00000.00000.0000
109.0150109.0150
2,207.5842,207.584
Total CO2Total CO2
11
0.00000.0000
109.0150109.0150
2,207.5842,207.584
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.03110.03110.46940.00000.4694
PM2.5PM2.5
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.46940.00000.4694
ExhaustExhaust
8.3000e-8.3000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.03030.0303
FugitiveFugitive
Page 22 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11500.11500.51020.00000.5102
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.51020.00000.5102
ExhaustExhaust
9.0000e-9.0000e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11410.1141
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02280.0228
1.0900e-1.0900e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.36330.3633
14.584214.5842
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.02550.0255
10.191710.1917
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.04270.04271.03270.00001.0327
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
109.0866109.0866
2,225.3962,225.396
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.71400.7140
2.8600e-2.8600e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
22
0.00000.00000.0000
109.0150109.0150
2,207.5472,207.547
Total CO2Total CO2
22
0.00000.0000
109.0150109.0150
2,207.5472,207.547
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.03110.03110.43100.00000.4310
PM2.5PM2.5
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.43100.00000.4310
ExhaustExhaust
8.3000e-8.3000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.03030.0303
FugitiveFugitive
Page 23 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11500.11500.46850.00000.4685
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.46850.00000.4685
ExhaustExhaust
9.0000e-9.0000e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11410.1141
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02280.0228
1.0900e-1.0900e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.36330.3633
14.625814.6258
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.02550.02559.52469.5246
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.04270.04270.98820.00000.9882
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
105.6992105.6992
2,225.3962,225.396
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.71400.7140
2.6300e-2.6300e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
22
0.00000.00000.0000
105.6336105.6336
2,207.5472,207.547
Total CO2Total CO2
22
0.00000.0000
105.6336105.6336
2,207.5472,207.547
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.03110.03110.43100.00000.4310
PM2.5PM2.5
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.43100.00000.4310
ExhaustExhaust
8.1000e-8.1000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.03030.0303
FugitiveFugitive
Page 24 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11500.11500.46850.00000.4685
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.46850.00000.4685
ExhaustExhaust
8.8000e-8.8000e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11410.1141
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02280.0228
1.0600e-1.0600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.33840.3384
14.625814.6258
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.02330.02339.52469.5246
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.04030.04030.98820.00000.9882
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
105.6992105.6992281.8443281.8443
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.01590.0159
2.6300e-2.6300e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
0.00000.00000.0000
105.6336105.6336281.4481281.4481
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.0000
105.6336105.6336281.4481281.4481
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.03110.03110.00000.06090.0609
PM2.5PM2.5
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
8.1000e-8.1000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.03030.0303
FugitiveFugitive
Page 25 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11500.11500.00000.06090.0609
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
8.8000e-8.8000e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11410.1141
FugitiveFugitive
003003003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0600e-1.0600e-2.9700e-2.9700e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00000.33840.33841.81011.8101
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.02330.02331.21881.2188
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.04030.04030.1808
236.4115236.5923
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Archit. Coating
3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
281.8443281.8443
1,127.4581,127.458
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.02800.02800.01590.0159
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
33
0.00000.00000.0000
281.4481281.4481
1,126.7581,126.758
Total CO2Total CO2
33
0.00000.0000
281.4481281.4481
1,126.7581,126.758
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.33150.33150.00000.06090.0609
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
8.6800e-8.6800e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.32290.3229
FugitiveFugitive
Page 26 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00001.22661.22660.00000.06090.0609
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
9.4300e-9.4300e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00001.21711.2171
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.01130.0113
2.9700e-2.9700e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
0.00000.00003.60983.60981.81011.8101
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.24810.24811.21881.2188
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.42960.42960.1808
236.4115236.5923
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Archit. Coating
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2e
0.00000.0000
1,127.4581,127.458
N2O
CH4
0.00000.00000.02800.0280
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
33
0.00000.0000
1,126.7581,126.758
Total CO2
33
0.00000.0000
1,126.7581,126.758
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Total
0.00000.00000.33150.3315
PM2.5
003003
PM2.5
0.00000.0000
Exhaust
8.6800e-8.6800e-
PM2.5
0.00000.00000.32290.3229
Fugitive
Page 27 of 35
Total
PM10
0.00000.00001.22661.2266
003003
PM10
0.00000.0000
Exhaust
9.4300e-9.4300e-
lb/day
PM10
0.00000.00001.21711.2171
Fugitive
SO2
0.00000.00000.01130.0113
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CO
0.00000.00003.60983.6098
NOx
0.00000.00000.24810.2481
ROG
0.00000.00000.42960.4296
Total
VendorWorker
Hauling
Category
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
0808
CO2e
50,361.1250,361.12
N2O
CH4
2.18072.1807
506,227706,812445,703707,488
Mitigated
3,413,9371,112,221
13,660,06520,552,452
Annual VMT
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
3434
50,306.6050,306.60
Total CO2
3434
50,306.6050,306.60
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
506,227706,812445,703707,488
3,413,9371,112,221
13,660,06520,552,452
Unmitigated
Annual VMT
Total
PM2.5
12.607012.6070
PM2.5
0.31190.3119
Exhaust
31.05
154.00160.00461.20357.84
PM2.5
4075.502817.72
8,057.31
12.295012.2950
Fugitive
Page 28 of 35
Sunday
Total
PM10
46.295146.2951
62.55
154.25187.50511.92601.44
3,773.252,873.528,164.43
Saturday
PM10
0.33600.3360
Exhaust
lb/day
Average Daily Trip Rate
PM10
45.959245.9592
Fugitive
145.75288.45192.00501.12528.08
4,026.752,368.808,050.95
Weekday
SO2
0.49170.4917
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CO
114.8495114.8495
NOx
45.430445.4304
Total
Hotel
Land Use
ROG
9.84899.8489
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
Regional Shopping Center
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
CategoryMitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Unmitigated
4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information
MH
0.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.000821
SBUS
0.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.000712
3344
434411
Pass-by
MCY
0.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.005285
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
11111920381835
UBUS
0.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.001817
Trip Purpose %
Diverted
OBUS
0.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.002613
86867737583854
Primary
HHD
0.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.033577
40.6040.6019.0019.0019.0019.0019.00
MHD
0.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.021166
H-O or C-NW
Trip %
LHD2
19.2019.2048.0072.5061.6069.0064.70
0.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.006332
H-S or C-C
Page 29 of 35
LHD1
0.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.014033
8.50
40.2040.2033.0019.4012.0016.30
H-W or C-W
MDV
0.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.116369
8.708.706.906.906.906.906.90
H-O or C-NW
LDT2
0.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.209971
5.905.908.408.408.408.408.40
Miles
H-S or C-C
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
LDT1
0.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.044216
14.7014.7016.6016.6016.6016.6016.60
LDA
0.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.543088
H-W or C-W
Hotel
Hotel
Land Use
Land Use
Restaurant)
Restaurant)
Quality Restaurant
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
General Office Building
High Turnover (Sit Down
High Turnover (Sit Down
Regional Shopping Center
Regional Shopping Center
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Historical Energy Use: N
4.4 Fleet Mix 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
77
CO2e
8,405.6388,405.638
N2O
0.15320.1532
CH4
0.16020.1602
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
22
8,355.9838,355.983
Total CO2
22
8,355.9838,355.983
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Total
0.52920.5292
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.52920.5292
Exhaust
PM2.5
Fugitive
Page 30 of 35
Total
PM10
0.52920.5292
PM10
0.52920.5292
Exhaust
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
SO2
0.04180.0418
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CO
4.25734.2573
NOx
6.74626.7462
ROG
0.76600.7660
CategoryMitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
NaturalGasNaturalGasUnmitigated
907
CO2e
29.7778
132.4486151.8884564.4782598.5658
4,234.9332,693.5468,405.638
003003004
N2O
0.07720.04910.01030.01090.1532
2.4100e-2.7700e-5.4000e-
003003004
CH4
0.08070.05130.01080.01140.1602
2.5200e-2.8900e-5.7000e-
lb/day
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
Total CO2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
003003003
Total
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
PM2.5
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
003003003
PM2.5
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
PM2.5
Fugitive
003003003
Total
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
Page 31 of 35
003003003
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
004004003003004
SO2
0.02110.01340.0418
6.6000e-7.5000e-2.8100e-2.9800e-1.5000e-
CO
0.04391.40330.10571.87430.39280.41650.02074.2573
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
NOx
0.10313.29780.12582.23140.46760.49590.02476.7463
003
ROG
0.01210.38590.01380.24550.05140.05450.7660
2.7100e-
s Use
kBTU/yr1119.1635784.31283.4222759.94769.725057.75251.616
NaturalGa
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated
High Turnover (Sit
907
CO2e
29.7778
132.4486151.8884564.4782598.5658
4,234.9332,693.5468,405.638
003003004
N2O
0.07720.04910.01030.01090.1532
2.4100e-2.7700e-5.4000e-
003003004
CH4
0.08070.05130.01080.01140.1602
2.5200e-2.8900e-5.7000e-
lb/day
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
Total CO2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
003003003
Total
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
PM2.5
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
003003003
PM2.5
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
PM2.5
Fugitive
003003003
Total
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
Page 32 of 35
003003003
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
004004003003004
SO2
0.02110.01340.0418
6.6000e-7.5000e-2.8100e-2.9800e-1.5000e-
CO
0.04391.40330.10571.87430.39280.41650.02074.2573
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
NOx
0.10313.29780.12582.23140.46760.49590.02476.7463
003
ROG
0.01210.38590.01380.24550.05140.05450.7660
2.7100e-
s Use
kBTU/yr1.1191635.78431.2834222.75994.769725.05775
0.251616
NaturalGa
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
High Turnover (Sit
92925092
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
152.1542
18,259.1118,259.1118,106.9618,259.11
N2ON2O
0.33000.33000.33000.3300
CH4CH4
0.48740.48740.34500.14240.4874
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
50500050
0.00000.0000
148.5950
18,148.5918,148.5918,000.0018,148.59
Total CO2Total CO2
50500050
148.5950
18,148.5918,148.5918,000.0018,148.59
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
FugitiveFugitive
Page 33 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM10PM10
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
FugitiveFugitive
003
SO2SO2
0.09440.09440.09000.0944
4.3600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
COCO
6.0000
88.443088.443082.443088.4430
NOxNOx
0.9496
15.049615.049614.100015.0496
ROGROG
2.26701.65002.4766
30.502030.502024.108530.5020
Total
Hearth
Coating
Products
CategoryMitigated
Consumer
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Landscaping
SubCategoryArchitectural
6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated
5092
CO2e
0.00000.0000
152.1542
18,106.9618,259.11
N2O
0.33000.3300
Fuel Type
CH4
0.34500.14240.4874
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
0050
0.00000.0000
148.5950
18,000.0018,148.59
Total CO2
Load Factor
0050
148.5950
18,000.0018,148.59
NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Horse Power
Total
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
Exhaust
Days/Year
PM2.5
Fugitive
Page 34 of 35
Total
PM10
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM10
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
Exhaust
Hours/Day
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
003
SO2
0.09000.0944
4.3600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Number
CO
6.0000
82.443088.4430
NOx
0.9496
14.100015.0496
ROG
2.26701.65002.4766
24.108530.5020
Equipment Type
Total
Hearth
Coating
Products
Consumer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Landscaping
SubCategoryArchitectural
6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated
7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fuel Type
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM
Fuel Type
Load Factor
Boiler Rating
Horse Power
Hours/Year
Heat Input/Year
Page 35 of 35
Hours/Day
Heat Input/Day
NumberNumber
Number
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Equipment TypeEquipment Type
Equipment Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
BoilersUser Defined Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators 11.0 Vegetation
00000
72
2789
Population
8,000.00
45,000.0036,000.0072,600.0025,000.0056,000.00
975,000.00
Floor Surface Area
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
332028
1.030.831.670.181.561.29
25.66
0.006
Lot Acreage
Precipitation Freq (Days)Operational YearN2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
MetricRoom
1000sqft1000sqft1000sqft1000sqft
Dwelling UnitDwelling Unit
Page 1 of 35
0.029
2.2
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Size8.00
45.0036.0050.0025.0056.00
975.00
Wind Speed (m/s)CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Urban9Southern California Edison702.44
Hotel
Land Uses
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
Regional Shopping Center
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage1.2 Other Project Characteristics UrbanizationClimate ZoneUtility CompanyCO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
0.000.000.000.006.173.871.39
10.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0079.82
New Value
1.257.166.392.46
48.7514.7014.7014.7014.7014.7014.70
158.37
1,019.201,019.20
Default Value
Page 2 of 35
ST_TRST_TRST_TRST_TR
NumberWoodNumberWood
Column Name
WorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLengthWorkerTripLength
FireplaceWoodMassFireplaceWoodMass
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Table Name
tblFireplacestblFireplacestblFireplacestblFireplaces
tblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTrips
tblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMTtblTripsAndVMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual
construction phase lengths.Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See
SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.Energy
Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.Water
Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
3.756.164.180.693.206.395.834.136.413.849.430.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
63.9910.7478.2757.6565.8062.64
8.196.075.861.055.956.596.658.171.251.25
94.3649.9772.1625.2411.0389.9542.7048.7548.7525.0025.00
131.84127.15999.60999.60
Page 3 of 35
ST_TRST_TRST_TR
SU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TRSU_TR
WD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TRWD_TR
NumberCatalyticNumberCatalytic
WoodstoveDayYearWoodstoveDayYear
NumberNoncatalyticNumberNoncatalytic
WoodstoveWoodMassWoodstoveWoodMass
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
tblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblV
ehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblVehicleTripstblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstovestblWoodstoves
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.0 Emissions Summary
67
139713
CO2e
6,203.01812,060.6011,734.442,324.96212,060.60
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
CH4
1.94721.94820.96170.71641.9482
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
77
408040
6,154.33712,035.3411,710.402,307.05112,035.34
Total CO2
77
408040
6,154.33712,035.3411,710.402,307.05112,035.34
NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Total
5.14212.59400.4621
PM2.5
11.849011.8490
PM2.5
1.88201.50520.71420.43191.8820
Exhaust
PM2.5
9.96703.63691.87990.32299.9670
Fugitive
Page 4 of 35
Total
PM10
7.76851.2875
20.248810.461620.2488
PM10
2.04561.63610.75980.46942.0456
Exhaust
lb/day
PM10
8.82557.00881.2171
18.203218.2032
Fugitive
SO2
0.06350.11950.11620.02380.1195
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CO
31.406839.633837.503114.937239.6338
NOx
9.5503
46.446038.885125.864846.4460
ROG
4.26214.79664.3939
237.0656237.0656
Year
2021202220232024
Maximum
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)Unmitigated Construction
67
139713
CO2e
0.00
CO2e
6,203.01812,060.6011,734.442,324.96212,060.60
N2O
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
N20
0.00
CH4
1.94721.94820.96170.71641.9482
CH40.00
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
77
408040
0.00
6,154.33712,035.3411,710.402,307.05112,035.34
Total CO2
Total CO2
77
408040
0.00
6,154.33712,035.3411,710.402,307.05112,035.34
NBio- CO2
NBio-CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
0.00
Bio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Total
5.14212.59400.46210.00
PM2.5
Total
11.849011.8490
PM2.5
0.00
PM2.5
1.88201.50520.71420.43191.8820
PM2.5
Exhaust
Exhaust
0.00
PM2.5
9.96703.63691.87990.32299.9670
PM2.5
Fugitive
Fugitive
Page 5 of 35
Total
0.00
PM10
7.76851.2875Total
PM10
20.248810.461620.2488
0.00
PM10
2.04561.63610.75980.46942.0456
PM10
Exhaust
Exhaust
lb/day
0.00
PM10
8.82557.00881.2171
PM10
18.203218.2032
Fugitive
Fugitive
SO2
0.00
SO2
0.06350.11950.11620.02380.1195
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CO
CO
0.00
31.406839.633837.503114.937239.6338
NOx
0.00
NOx
9.5503
46.446038.885125.864846.4460
ROG
0.00
ROG
4.26214.79664.3939
237.0656237.0656
Year
2021202220232024
Percent
Maximum
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)Mitigated Construction
77
923917923917
CO2eCO2e
18,259.118,405.63847,972.6874,637.4418,259.118,405.63847,972.6874,637.44
N2ON2O
0.33000.15320.48320.33000.15320.4832
CH4CH4
0.48740.16022.19532.84290.48740.16022.19532.8429
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
22
500587500587
18,148.598,355.98347,917.8074,422.3718,148.598,355.98347,917.8074,422.37
Total CO2Total CO2
22
500587500587
18,148.598,355.98347,917.8074,422.3718,148.598,355.98347,917.8074,422.37
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
1.59740.52921.59740.5292
PM2.5PM2.5
12.608314.734912.608314.7349
PM2.5PM2.5
1.59740.52920.31322.43991.59740.52920.31322.4399
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
12.295012.295012.295012.2950
FugitiveFugitive
Page 6 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
1.59740.52921.59740.5292
46.296548.423146.296548.4231
PM10PM10
1.59740.52920.33732.46401.59740.52920.33732.4640
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
45.959245.959245.959245.9592
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.09440.04180.46810.60430.09440.04180.46810.6043
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
4.25734.2573
88.443088.4430
110.0422202.7424110.0422202.7424
NOxNOx
6.74626.7462
15.049645.991467.787215.049645.991467.7872
ROGROG
0.76609.52330.76609.5233
30.502040.791230.502040.7912
AreaArea
TotalTotal
MobileMobile
EnergyEnergy
CategoryCategory
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated OperationalMitigated Operational
0.00
CO2e
N20
0.00
0.00
CH4
0.00
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Total CO2
Phase Description
0.00
NBio-CO2
3020453535
500
0.00
Bio- CO2
Num Days
555555
0.00
Total
PM2.5
Week
Num Days
0.00
PM2.5
Exhaust
0.00
End Date
PM2.5
Fugitive
10/12/202111/9/20211/11/202212/12/20231/30/20243/19/2024
Page 7 of 35
0.00
Total
PM10
Start Date
0.00
PM10
9/1/202110/13/202111/10/20211/12/202212/13/20231/31/2024
Exhaust
0.00
PM10
Fugitive
0.00
SO2
Phase Type
sqft)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CO
0.00
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
0.00
NOx
0.00
ROG
Phase Name
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
Percent
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Phase
Number
3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase 123456 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400;
Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5Acres of Paving: 0OffRoad Equipment
0.730.380.400.400.370.380.410.400.480.370.290.200.740.370.450.420.360.380.48
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Load Factor
819797898497468078
158247247158187247367231130132
Horse Power
8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.007.008.008.007.008.008.008.008.006.00
Usage Hours
1323421122131312221
Page 8 of 35
Amount
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Offroad Equipment Type
Concrete/Industrial SawsExcavatorsRubber Tired DozersRubber Tired DozersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesExcavatorsGradersRubber Tired DozersScrapersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesCranesForkliftsGenerator
SetsTractors/Loaders/BackhoesWeldersPaversPaving EquipmentRollersAir Compressors
Phase Name
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
DemolitionDemolitionDemolitionSite PreparationSite PreparationGradingGradingGradingGradingGradingBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding ConstructionBuilding
ConstructionPavingPavingPavingArchitectural Coating Trips and VMT
44
CO2e
0.0000
3,774.3173,774.317
Hauling
N2O
Vehicle Class
HHDTHHDTHHDTHHDTHHDTHHDT
CH4
1.05491.0549
Vendor
Vehicle Class
HDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_MixHDT_Mix
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
99
0.0000
3,747.9443,747.944
Total CO2
Class
99
Worker Vehicle
3,747.9443,747.944
NBio- CO2
LD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_MixLD_Mix
20.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.00
Bio- CO2
Length
Hauling Trip
Total
0.50081.44111.9419
PM2.5
6.906.906.906.906.906.90
Length
Vendor Trip
PM2.5
0.00001.44111.4411
Exhaust
10.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.00
PM2.5
0.50080.5008
Length
Fugitive
Page 9 of 35
Worker Trip
0.000.000.000.000.00
Total
PM10
3.30741.55134.8588
458.00
Number
Hauling Trip
PM10
0.00001.55131.5513
Exhaust
0.000.000.000.000.00
lb/day
143.00
Number
PM10
3.30743.3074
Vendor Trip
Fugitive
15.0018.0020.0015.00
801.00160.00
SO2
0.03880.0388
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Number
Worker Trip
678961
CO
21.565021.5650
NOx
Count
31.440731.4407
Offroad Equipment
ROG
3.16513.1651
Total
Phase Name
CategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
DemolitionSite PreparationGradingBuilding ConstructionPavingArchitectural Coating
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
2144
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
110.5539
1,272.1251,382.6793,774.3173,774.317
N2ON2O
003
CH4CH4
0.09080.00000.09411.05491.0549
3.3300e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
5299
0.00000.0000
110.4707
1,269.8551,380.3263,747.9443,747.944
Total CO2Total CO2
5299
0.0000
110.4707
1,269.8551,380.3263,747.9443,747.944
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.08540.00000.03110.11650.50081.44111.9419
PM2.5PM2.5
004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.01220.00000.01310.00001.44111.4411
ExhaustExhaust
8.8000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.07320.00000.03030.10340.50080.5008
FugitiveFugitive
Page 10 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.27970.00000.11510.39483.30741.55134.8588
004
PM10PM10
0.01280.00000.01370.00001.55131.5513
ExhaustExhaust
9.5000e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.26690.00000.11410.38103.30743.3074
FugitiveFugitive
003
SO2SO2
0.01170.00000.01280.03880.0388
1.1100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
1.01820.00000.39631.4144
21.565021.5650
NOxNOx
4.14540.00000.03464.1800
31.440731.4407
ROGROG
0.13040.00000.05320.18353.16513.1651
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
2133
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
110.5539
1,272.1251,382.6793,715.4573,715.457
N2ON2O
003
CH4CH4
0.09080.00000.09411.19201.1920
3.3300e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
5299
0.00000.0000
110.4707
1,269.8551,380.3263,685.6563,685.656
Total CO2Total CO2
5299
0.0000
110.4707
1,269.8551,380.3263,685.6563,685.656
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.08540.00000.03110.11659.93071.8809
PM2.5PM2.5
11.8116
004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.01220.00000.01310.00001.88091.8809
ExhaustExhaust
8.8000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.07320.00000.03030.10349.93079.9307
FugitiveFugitive
Page 11 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.27970.00000.11510.39482.0445
18.066320.1107
004
PM10PM10
0.01280.00000.01370.00002.04452.0445
ExhaustExhaust
9.5000e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.26690.00000.11410.3810
18.066318.0663
FugitiveFugitive
003
SO2SO2
0.01170.00000.01280.03800.0380
1.1100e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
1.01820.00000.39631.4144
21.154321.1543
NOxNOx
4.14540.00000.03464.1800
40.497140.4971
ROGROG
0.13040.00000.05320.18353.88823.8882
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
132.6646132.6646
3,715.4573,715.457
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.19201.1920
3.9900e-3.9900e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
99
0.00000.00000.0000
132.5649132.5649
3,685.6563,685.656
Total CO2Total CO2
99
0.00000.0000
132.5649132.5649
3,685.6563,685.656
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.03740.03749.93071.8809
PM2.5PM2.5
11.8116
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.88091.8809
ExhaustExhaust
1.0500e-1.0500e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.03630.03639.93079.9307
FugitiveFugitive
Page 12 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.13810.13812.0445
18.066320.1107
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00002.04452.0445
ExhaustExhaust
1.1400e-1.1400e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.13690.1369
18.066318.0663
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.03800.0380
1.3300e-1.3300e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.47550.4755
21.154321.1543
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.04150.0415
40.497140.4971
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.06380.06383.88823.8882
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
44
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
132.6646132.6646
6,055.6136,055.613
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94281.9428
3.9900e-3.9900e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
44
0.00000.00000.0000
132.5649132.5649
6,007.0436,007.043
Total CO2Total CO2
44
0.00000.0000
132.5649132.5649
6,007.0436,007.043
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.03740.03743.59651.82655.4230
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.82651.8265
ExhaustExhaust
1.0500e-1.0500e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.03630.03633.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 13 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.13810.13818.67331.9853
10.6587
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.98531.9853
ExhaustExhaust
1.1400e-1.1400e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.13690.13698.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06200.0620
1.3300e-1.3300e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.47550.4755
30.878530.8785
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.04150.0415
46.399846.3998
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.06380.06384.19124.1912
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
44
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
147.4051147.4051
6,055.6136,055.613
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94281.9428
4.4300e-4.4300e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
44
0.00000.00000.0000
147.2943147.2943
6,007.0436,007.043
Total CO2Total CO2
44
0.00000.0000
147.2943147.2943
6,007.0436,007.043
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04150.04153.59651.82655.4230
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.82651.8265
ExhaustExhaust
1.1700e-1.1700e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04040.04043.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 14 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15340.15348.67331.9853
10.6587
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.98531.9853
ExhaustExhaust
1.2700e-1.2700e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15210.15218.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06200.0620
1.4800e-1.4800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.52840.5284
30.878530.8785
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.04620.0462
46.399846.3998
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.07090.07094.19124.1912
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
88
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
147.4051147.4051
6,060.0156,060.015
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94421.9442
4.4300e-4.4300e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
55
0.00000.00000.0000
147.2943147.2943
6,011.4106,011.410
Total CO2Total CO2
55
0.00000.0000
147.2943147.2943
6,011.4106,011.410
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04150.04153.59651.50415.1006
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.50411.5041
ExhaustExhaust
1.1700e-1.1700e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04040.04043.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 15 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15340.15348.67331.6349
10.3082
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.63491.6349
ExhaustExhaust
1.2700e-1.2700e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15210.15218.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06210.0621
1.4800e-1.4800e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.52840.5284
29.041529.0415
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.04620.0462
38.843538.8435
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.07090.07093.62483.6248
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
88
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
142.2207142.2207
6,060.0156,060.015
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00001.94421.9442
4.0000e-4.0000e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
55
0.00000.00000.0000
142.1207142.1207
6,011.4106,011.410
Total CO2Total CO2
55
0.00000.0000
142.1207142.1207
6,011.4106,011.410
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04150.04153.59651.50415.1006
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00001.50411.5041
ExhaustExhaust
1.1300e-1.1300e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04040.04043.59653.5965
FugitiveFugitive
Page 16 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15340.15348.67331.6349
10.3082
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00001.63491.6349
ExhaustExhaust
1.2300e-1.2300e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15210.15218.67338.6733
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.06210.0621
1.4300e-1.4300e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.48610.4861
29.041529.0415
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.04160.0416
38.843538.8435
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.06650.06653.62483.6248
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Fugitive Dust
3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
22
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
142.2207142.2207
2,569.6322,569.632
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.61200.6120
4.0000e-4.0000e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
66
0.00000.0000
142.1207142.1207
2,554.3332,554.333
Total CO2Total CO2
66
0.00000.0000
142.1207142.1207
2,554.3332,554.333
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.04150.04150.76120.7612
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.76120.7612
ExhaustExhaust
1.1300e-1.1300e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.04040.0404
FugitiveFugitive
Page 17 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15340.15340.80900.8090
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.80900.8090
ExhaustExhaust
1.2300e-1.2300e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.15210.1521
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02690.0269
1.4300e-1.4300e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.48610.4861
16.363416.3634
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.04160.0416
15.615615.6156
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.06650.06651.70621.7062
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
38122
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
3,795.0285,695.9409,490.9692,569.6322,569.632
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.23810.16020.39840.61200.6120
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
04466
0.0000
3,789.0755,691.9359,481.0102,554.3332,554.333
Total CO2Total CO2
04466
0.0000
3,789.0755,691.9359,481.0102,554.3332,554.333
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.28811.66171.94980.76120.7612
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.02450.04540.06990.76120.7612
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26361.61631.8799
FugitiveFugitive
Page 18 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.94126.14257.08360.80900.8090
PM10PM10
0.00000.02560.04930.07490.80900.8090
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91556.09327.0087
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03540.05710.09260.02690.0269
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00003.8005
19.469923.270416.363416.3634
NOxNOx
0.00001.6677
13.167314.835015.615615.6156
ROGROG
0.00000.42842.66203.09041.70621.7062
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
38111
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
3,795.0285,695.9409,490.9692,570.4062,570.406
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.23810.16020.39840.60790.6079
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
04499
0.0000
3,789.0755,691.9359,481.0102,555.2092,555.209
Total CO2Total CO2
04499
0.0000
3,789.0755,691.9359,481.0102,555.2092,555.209
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.28811.66171.94980.65840.6584
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.02450.04540.06990.65840.6584
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26361.61631.8799
FugitiveFugitive
Page 19 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.94126.14257.08360.69970.6997
PM10PM10
0.00000.02560.04930.07490.69970.6997
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91556.09327.0087
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03540.05710.09260.02690.0269
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00003.8005
19.469923.270416.244016.2440
NOxNOx
0.00001.6677
13.167314.835014.384914.3849
ROGROG
0.00000.42842.66203.09041.57281.5728
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
70711
CO2eCO2e
0.0000
3,676.6415,487.4029,164.0432,570.4062,570.406
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.20960.14420.35380.60790.6079
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
74199
0.0000
3,671.4005,483.7979,155.1982,555.2092,555.209
Total CO2Total CO2
74199
0.0000
3,671.4005,483.7979,155.1982,555.2092,555.209
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.27521.66041.93560.65840.6584
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.01160.04410.05570.65840.6584
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26361.61631.8799
FugitiveFugitive
Page 20 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.92776.14117.06880.69970.6997
PM10PM10
0.00000.01220.04790.06010.69970.6997
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91566.09327.0088
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03430.05500.08930.02690.0269
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00003.3771
17.882021.259116.244016.2440
NOxNOx
0.00009.97261.5073
11.479914.384914.3849
ROGROG
0.00000.31832.50292.82111.57281.5728
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
70766
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
3,676.6415,487.4029,164.0432,225.4332,225.433
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.20960.14420.35380.71400.7140
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
74111
0.00000.0000
3,671.4005,483.7979,155.1982,207.5842,207.584
Total CO2Total CO2
74111
0.0000
3,671.4005,483.7979,155.1982,207.5842,207.584
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.27521.66041.93560.46940.00000.4694
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.01160.04410.05570.46940.00000.4694
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.26361.61631.8799
FugitiveFugitive
Page 21 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.92776.14117.06880.51020.00000.5102
PM10PM10
0.00000.01220.04790.06010.51020.00000.5102
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.91566.09327.0088
FugitiveFugitive
SO2SO2
0.00000.03430.05500.08930.02280.0228
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00003.3771
17.882021.259114.584214.5842
NOxNOx
0.00009.97261.5073
11.479910.191710.1917
ROGROG
0.00000.31832.50292.82111.03270.00001.0327
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
66
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
102.7603102.7603
2,225.4332,225.433
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.71400.7140
2.7000e-2.7000e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
11
0.00000.00000.0000
102.6928102.6928
2,207.5842,207.584
Total CO2Total CO2
11
0.00000.0000
102.6928102.6928
2,207.5842,207.584
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.03110.03110.46940.00000.4694
PM2.5PM2.5
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.46940.00000.4694
ExhaustExhaust
8.3000e-8.3000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.03030.0303
FugitiveFugitive
Page 22 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11500.11500.51020.00000.5102
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.51020.00000.5102
ExhaustExhaust
9.0000e-9.0000e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11410.1141
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02280.0228
1.0300e-1.0300e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.33490.3349
14.584214.5842
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.02820.0282
10.191710.1917
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.04690.04691.03270.00001.0327
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
102.7603102.7603
2,225.3962,225.396
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.71400.7140
2.7000e-2.7000e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
22
0.00000.00000.0000
102.6928102.6928
2,207.5472,207.547
Total CO2Total CO2
22
0.00000.0000
102.6928102.6928
2,207.5472,207.547
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.03110.03110.43100.00000.4310
PM2.5PM2.5
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.43100.00000.4310
ExhaustExhaust
8.3000e-8.3000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.03030.0303
FugitiveFugitive
Page 23 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11500.11500.46850.00000.4685
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.46850.00000.4685
ExhaustExhaust
9.0000e-9.0000e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11410.1141
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02280.0228
1.0300e-1.0300e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.33490.3349
14.625814.6258
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.02820.02829.52469.5246
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.04690.04690.98820.00000.9882
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
33
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
99.566399.5663
2,225.3962,225.396
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.71400.7140
2.4700e-2.4700e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
22
0.00000.00000.0000
99.504599.5045
2,207.5472,207.547
Total CO2Total CO2
22
0.00000.0000
99.504599.5045
2,207.5472,207.547
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.03110.03110.43100.00000.4310
PM2.5PM2.5
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.43100.00000.4310
ExhaustExhaust
8.1000e-8.1000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.03030.0303
FugitiveFugitive
Page 24 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11500.11500.46850.00000.4685
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.46850.00000.4685
ExhaustExhaust
8.8000e-8.8000e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11410.1141
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.02280.0228
1.0000e-1.0000e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.31140.3114
14.625814.6258
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.02570.02579.52469.5246
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.04440.04440.98820.00000.9882
TotalTotal
Paving
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
99.566399.5663
281.8443281.8443
N2ON2O
003003
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.01590.0159
2.4700e-2.4700e-
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
0.00000.00000.0000
99.504599.5045
281.4481281.4481
Total CO2Total CO2
0.00000.0000
99.504599.5045
281.4481281.4481
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.03110.03110.00000.06090.0609
PM2.5PM2.5
004004
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
8.1000e-8.1000e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.03030.0303
FugitiveFugitive
Page 25 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11500.11500.00000.06090.0609
004004
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
8.8000e-8.8000e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.11410.1141
FugitiveFugitive
003003003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.0000
1.0000e-1.0000e-2.9700e-2.9700e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00000.31140.31141.81011.8101
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.02570.02571.21881.2188
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.04440.04440.1808
236.4115236.5923
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Archit. Coating
3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
00
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.00000.0000
281.8443281.8443
1,062.0411,062.041
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
0.00000.00000.02640.02640.01590.0159
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
88
0.00000.00000.0000
281.4481281.4481
1,061.3811,061.381
Total CO2Total CO2
88
0.00000.0000
281.4481281.4481
1,061.3811,061.381
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
0.00000.00000.33150.33150.00000.06090.0609
PM2.5PM2.5
003003
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
8.6800e-8.6800e-
PM2.5PM2.5
0.00000.00000.32290.3229
FugitiveFugitive
Page 26 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
0.00000.00001.22661.22660.00000.06090.0609
003003
PM10PM10
0.00000.00000.00000.06090.0609
ExhaustExhaust
9.4300e-9.4300e-
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
0.00000.00001.21711.2171
FugitiveFugitive
003003
SO2SO2
0.00000.00000.01070.0107
2.9700e-2.9700e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
0.00000.00003.32203.32201.81011.8101
NOxNOx
0.00000.00000.27430.27431.21881.2188
ROGROG
0.00000.00000.47340.47340.1808
236.4115236.5923
TotalTotal
VendorWorker
Hauling
CategoryCategoryOff-Road
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Archit. Coating
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteMitigated Construction On-Site
00
CO2e
0.00000.0000
1,062.0411,062.041
N2O
CH4
0.00000.00000.02640.0264
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
88
0.00000.0000
1,061.3811,061.381
Total CO2
88
0.00000.0000
1,061.3811,061.381
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Total
0.00000.00000.33150.3315
PM2.5
003003
PM2.5
0.00000.0000
Exhaust
8.6800e-8.6800e-
PM2.5
0.00000.00000.32290.3229
Fugitive
Page 27 of 35
Total
PM10
0.00000.00001.22661.2266
003003
PM10
0.00000.0000
Exhaust
9.4300e-9.4300e-
lb/day
PM10
0.00000.00001.21711.2171
Fugitive
SO2
0.00000.00000.01070.0107
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CO
0.00000.00003.32203.3220
NOx
0.00000.00000.27430.2743
ROG
0.00000.00000.47340.4734
Total
VendorWorker
Hauling
Category
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3939
CO2e
47,972.6847,972.68
N2O
CH4
2.19532.1953
506,227706,812445,703707,488
Mitigated
3,413,9371,112,221
13,660,06520,552,452
Annual VMT
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
0505
47,917.8047,917.80
Total CO2
0505
47,917.8047,917.80
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
506,227706,812445,703707,488
3,413,9371,112,221
13,660,06520,552,452
Unmitigated
Annual VMT
Total
PM2.5
12.608312.6083
PM2.5
0.31320.3132
Exhaust
31.05
154.00160.00461.20357.84
PM2.5
4075.502817.72
8,057.31
12.295012.2950
Fugitive
Page 28 of 35
Sunday
Total
PM10
46.296546.2965
62.55
154.25187.50511.92601.44
3,773.252,873.528,164.43
Saturday
PM10
0.33730.3373
Exhaust
lb/day
Average Daily Trip Rate
PM10
45.959245.9592
Fugitive
145.75288.45192.00501.12528.08
4,026.752,368.808,050.95
Weekday
SO2
0.46810.4681
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CO
110.0422110.0422
NOx
45.991445.9914
Total
Hotel
Land Use
ROG
9.52339.5233
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
Regional Shopping Center
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
CategoryMitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Unmitigated
4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information
MH
0.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.0008210.000821
SBUS
0.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.0007120.000712
3344
434411
Pass-by
MCY
0.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.0052850.005285
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
11111920381835
UBUS
0.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.0018170.001817
Trip Purpose %
Diverted
OBUS
0.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.0026130.002613
86867737583854
Primary
HHD
0.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.0335770.033577
40.6040.6019.0019.0019.0019.0019.00
MHD
0.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.0211660.021166
H-O or C-NW
Trip %
LHD2
19.2019.2048.0072.5061.6069.0064.70
0.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.0063320.006332
H-S or C-C
Page 29 of 35
LHD1
0.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.0140330.014033
8.50
40.2040.2033.0019.4012.0016.30
H-W or C-W
MDV
0.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.1163690.116369
8.708.706.906.906.906.906.90
H-O or C-NW
LDT2
0.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.2099710.209971
5.905.908.408.408.408.408.40
Miles
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
H-S or C-C
LDT1
0.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.0442160.044216
14.7014.7016.6016.6016.6016.6016.60
LDA
0.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.5430880.543088
H-W or C-W
Hotel
Hotel
Land Use
Land Use
Restaurant)
Restaurant)
Quality Restaurant
Quality Restaurant
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
Apartments Mid Rise
Apartments Low Rise
General Office Building
General Office Building
High Turnover (Sit Down
High Turnover (Sit Down
Regional Shopping Center
Regional Shopping Center
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Historical Energy Use: N
4.4 Fleet Mix 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
77
CO2e
8,405.6388,405.638
N2O
0.15320.1532
CH4
0.16020.1602
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
22
8,355.9838,355.983
Total CO2
22
8,355.9838,355.983
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
Total
0.52920.5292
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.52920.5292
Exhaust
PM2.5
Fugitive
Page 30 of 35
Total
PM10
0.52920.5292
PM10
0.52920.5292
Exhaust
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
SO2
0.04180.0418
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CO
4.25734.2573
NOx
6.74626.7462
ROG
0.76600.7660
CategoryMitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
NaturalGasNaturalGasUnmitigated
907
CO2e
29.7778
132.4486151.8884564.4782598.5658
4,234.9332,693.5468,405.638
003003004
N2O
0.07720.04910.01030.01090.1532
2.4100e-2.7700e-5.4000e-
003003004
CH4
0.08070.05130.01080.01140.1602
2.5200e-2.8900e-5.7000e-
lb/day
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
Total CO2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
003003003
Total
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
PM2.5
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
003003003
PM2.5
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
PM2.5
Fugitive
003003003
Total
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
Page 31 of 35
003003003
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
004004003003004
SO2
0.02110.01340.0418
6.6000e-7.5000e-2.8100e-2.9800e-1.5000e-
CO
0.04391.40330.10571.87430.39280.41650.02074.2573
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
NOx
0.10313.29780.12582.23140.46760.49590.02476.7463
003
ROG
0.01210.38590.01380.24550.05140.05450.7660
2.7100e-
s Use
kBTU/yr1119.1635784.31283.4222759.94769.725057.75251.616
NaturalGa
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated
High Turnover (Sit
907
CO2e
29.7778
132.4486151.8884564.4782598.5658
4,234.9332,693.5468,405.638
003003004
N2O
0.07720.04910.01030.01090.1532
2.4100e-2.7700e-5.4000e-
003003004
CH4
0.08070.05130.01080.01140.1602
2.5200e-2.8900e-5.7000e-
lb/day
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
Total CO2
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
422
29.6019
131.6662150.9911561.1436595.0298
4,209.9162,677.6348,355.983
NBio- CO2
Bio- CO2
003003003
Total
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
PM2.5
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
003003003
PM2.5
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
PM2.5
Fugitive
003003003
Total
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
Page 32 of 35
003003003
PM10
0.26660.16960.03550.03770.5292
Exhaust
8.3400e-9.5600e-1.8700e-
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
004004003003004
SO2
0.02110.01340.0418
6.6000e-7.5000e-2.8100e-2.9800e-1.5000e-
CO
0.04391.40330.10571.87430.39280.41650.02074.2573
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
NOx
0.10313.29780.12582.23140.46760.49590.02476.7463
003
ROG
0.01210.38590.01380.24550.05140.05450.7660
2.7100e-
s Use
kBTU/yr1.1191635.78431.2834222.75994.769725.05775
0.251616
NaturalGa
RiseRise
Hotel
Total
Quality
Building
Regional
Land Use
Restaurant
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
General Office
Apartments Mid
Apartments Low Shopping Center
Down Restaurant)
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
High Turnover (Sit
92925092
CO2eCO2e
0.00000.0000
152.1542
18,259.1118,259.1118,106.9618,259.11
N2ON2O
0.33000.33000.33000.3300
CH4CH4
0.48740.48740.34500.14240.4874
lb/daylb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
50500050
0.00000.0000
148.5950
18,148.5918,148.5918,000.0018,148.59
Total CO2Total CO2
50500050
148.5950
18,148.5918,148.5918,000.0018,148.59
NBio- CO2NBio- CO2
0.00000.00000.00000.0000
Bio- CO2Bio- CO2
TotalTotal
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM2.5PM2.5
PM2.5PM2.5
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
ExhaustExhaust
PM2.5PM2.5
FugitiveFugitive
Page 33 of 35
TotalTotal
PM10PM10
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM10PM10
1.59741.59740.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
ExhaustExhaust
lb/daylb/day
PM10PM10
FugitiveFugitive
003
SO2SO2
0.09440.09440.09000.0944
4.3600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
COCO
6.0000
88.443088.443082.443088.4430
NOxNOx
0.9496
15.049615.049614.100015.0496
ROGROG
2.26701.65002.4766
30.502030.502024.108530.5020
Total
Hearth
Coating
Products
CategoryMitigated
Consumer
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Landscaping
SubCategoryArchitectural
6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated
5092
CO2e
0.00000.0000
152.1542
18,106.9618,259.11
N2O
0.33000.3300
Fuel Type
CH4
0.34500.14240.4874
lb/day
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
0050
0.00000.0000
148.5950
18,000.0018,148.59
Total CO2
Load Factor
0050
148.5950
18,000.0018,148.59
NBio- CO2
0.00000.0000
Bio- CO2
Horse Power
Total
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM2.5
PM2.5
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
Exhaust
Days/Year
PM2.5
Fugitive
Page 34 of 35
Total
PM10
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
PM10
0.00000.00001.14000.45741.5974
Exhaust
Hours/Day
lb/day
PM10
Fugitive
003
SO2
0.09000.0944
4.3600e-
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Number
CO
6.0000
82.443088.4430
NOx
0.9496
14.100015.0496
ROG
2.26701.65002.4766
24.108530.5020
Equipment Type
Total
Hearth
Coating
Products
Consumer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Landscaping
SubCategoryArchitectural
6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated
7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fuel Type
Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM
Fuel Type
Load Factor
Boiler Rating
Horse Power
Hours/Year
Heat Input/Year
Page 35 of 35
Hours/Day
Heat Input/Day
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
NumberNumber
Number
Equipment TypeEquipment Type
Equipment Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
BoilersUser Defined Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators 11.0 Vegetation
Local Hire Provision Net Change
Without Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e)3,623
Amortized (MT CO2e/year)
120.77
With Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e)3,024
Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 100.80
% Decrease in Construction-related GHG Emissions17%
EXHIBIT B
EXHIBIT C
th
1640 5St.., Suite 204 Santa
Santa Monica, California 90401
Tel: (949) 887-9013
Email: mhagemann@swape.com
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD,QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
CEQA Review
Education:
M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.
B.A.Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.
Professional Certifications:
California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:
Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine
years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science
Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from
perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of
the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement
actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working
with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring.
Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the
application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt
has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of
Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques.
Positions Matt has held include:
Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present);
Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 24;
Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 -- 2003);
Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004);
Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989–
1998);
Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000);
Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 –
1998);
Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995);
Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).
Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:
With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports
since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water
resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic
hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the
local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and
implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins
and Valley Fever.
Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities.
Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former
Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA.
Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns.
Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications
for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission.
Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S.
Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in
Southern California drinking water wells.
Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the
review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas
stations throughout California.
Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation.
Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school.
Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant.
With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony
by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel.
Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology
of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology
of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking
water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony
against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies.
Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by
MTBE in California and New York.
2
Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production-related contamination in Mississippi.
Lead author for a multi-volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los
Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines.
3
Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with
clients and regulators.
Executive Director:
As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange
County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of
wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange
County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection
of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the
development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the
discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including
Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business
institutions including the Orange County Business Council.
Hydrogeology:
As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to
characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point
Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army
Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of
monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and
groundwater.
Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory
analysis at military bases.
Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation
development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund
Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.
At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of
groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to
show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and
County of Maui.
As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the
Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included
the following:
Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for
the protection of drinking water.
Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities
through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports,
conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very
concerned about the impact of designation.
4
Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments,
including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water
transfer.
Mattserved as ahydrogeologistwiththeRCRAHazardous Waste program.Duties wereas follows:
Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance
with Subtitle C requirements.
Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste.
Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed
the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.
EPA legal counsel.
Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.
With the National Park Service, Matt directed service-wide investigations of contaminant sources to
prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the
Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants.
Conducted watershed-scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and
Olympic National Park.
Identified high-levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico
and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA.
Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a
national workgroup.
Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while
serving on a national workgroup.
Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal
watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation-
wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks.
Contributed to the Federal Multi-Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water
Action Plan.
Policy:
Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following:
Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the
potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking
water supplies.
Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing
to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in
Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff.
Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in
negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific
principles into the policy-making process.
Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.
5
Geology:
WiththeU.S.ForestService,Mattledinvestigationstodeterminehillslopestabilityofareasproposedfor
timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical
models to determine slope stability.
Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource
protection.
Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the
city of Medford, Oregon.
As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later
listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern
Oregon. Duties included the following:
Supervised year-long effort for soil and groundwater sampling.
Conducted aquifer tests.
Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.
Teaching:
From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university
levels:
At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in
environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater
contamination.
Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students.
Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.
Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in
Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014.
Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:
Hagemann,M.F.,2008. Disclosure ofHazardous Waste Issues under CEQA.PresentationtothePublic
Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.
EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.
Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and
Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water
in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las
Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at
schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.
6
Brown,A., Farrow,J., Gray,A. and Hagemann,M., 2004. An EstimateofCoststoAddress MTBE
Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.
Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater
Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water
in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust,
Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann,M.F., 2003. Perchlorate ContaminationoftheColoradoRiver and ImpactstoDrinking Water
in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy
of Sciences, Irvine, CA.
Hagemann,M.F.,2003. Perchlorate ContaminationoftheColoradoRiver. Invitedpresentationtoa
tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a
meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water
Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter-Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.
Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited
presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of
the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a
meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address
Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental
Journalists.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater
(and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage
Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and
State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished
report.
7
Hagemann,M.F.,2001. EstimatedCleanupCostforMTBEinGroundwaterUsedasDrinkingWater.
Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage
Tanks. Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential Water Quality Concerns Related
to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft
Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright
Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.
Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund
Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air
Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.
Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic
Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui,
October 1996.
Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu,
Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air
and Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61.
Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup at Closing Military Bases
in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater
Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of
Groundwater.
Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL-
contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
8
Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of
Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.
Other Experience:
Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009-
2011.
9
From:Corrie Chitlik
To:Samaras, Paul
Cc:barbara.boland@mac.com; Tracey Miller-Zarneke
Subject:Public Comment: Downtown Specific Plan Update
Date:Thursday, January 12, 2023 11:33:26 AM
To Whom it May Concern,
Please consider incorporating sea-cliff buckwheat plants into your landscaping design. This is the
only food the native El Segundo Blue Butterfly eats. It would also be neat to have signage for the
general public which would explain the native habitat (Culture Development Fund to pay for
signage).
Can you also please consider solar and battery backup power, or alternative zero emission or ultra
low emission options (linear generator, fuel cell, etc.). El Segundo should focus on micro grids so
our town has resiliency. This also helps reduce our carbon footprint, as needed under our Climate
Action Plan.
Best regards,
Corrie Zupo
November 2023
Public Review Draft
FHVOEP
!T
M
Epxoupxo!Tqfdjgjd!Qmbo
F
CITY STAFF
CONSULTANTS
Michael Allen, Director of Community Development Eduardo Schonborn, Planning Manager Paul Samaras, Principal Planner RRM Design GroupFehr & PeersThe Natelson Dale GroupEcoTierra Consulting
Teresa Grimes
CITY COUNCIL
PLANNING COMMISSION
Acknowledgments Drew Boyles, MayorChrist Pimentel, Mayor Pro TemCarol Pirsztuk, CouncilmemberRyan Baldino, CouncilmemberLance Giroux, CouncilmemberMichelle Keldorf, ChairJay Hoeschler,
Vice-ChairBrenda Newman, CommissionerKevin Maggay, CommissionerMario Inga, Commissioner
7-1
A-1
5-16-1
B-1
7-27-2
5-7 7-3 7-5
7-8
5-26-9
6-16
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
............
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...............
..................
...................
...............................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A. IntroductionB. InfrastructureC. Public FacilitiesA. IntroductionB. Implementation Action PlanC. Potential Funding MechanismsA. IntroductionB. Authority and AdoptionC. Specific Plan
AmendmentsD. Specific Plan AdministrationE. Design Review ProcessF. Environmental ReviewA. Relationship to the General PlanB. Definitions
1-1
1-61-92-13-14-1
1-8
3-7
2-22-22-93-24-2
3-94-8
3-11
2-21
2-174-17
2-134-19
2-27
3-25
3-28
. . .
. .
....
.........
.............
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.........................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A. Introduction B. Relationship to Other Planning Documents . C. Document Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . D. VisionA. IntroductionB. District Based Approach C. Using
this ChapterD. Main Street DistrictE. Richmond Street DistrictF. Grand Avenue District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G. Civic Center District H. Supplemental Area-Wide
Standards and GuidelinesA. Introduction B. Pedestrian NetworkC. Bicycle CirculationD. Public TransitE. Vehicular Circulation F. Alley EnhancementsG. Parking StrategiesA. Introduction
B. Gateway and Wayfinding Signage C. Streetscape Design and Pedestrian AmenitiesD. Public ArtE. Landscaping
Table of Contents
1-31-5
3-7
2-9
2-3 3-23-43-54-3 5-4
2-17 2-21 3-17 3-213-31
2-13 3-123-143-19
3-133-153-16 3-18
3-10
2-232-252-29
3-25
3-28
3-20
.
..
......
. . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . .
................
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...........
. . . . . . . . . . .
............
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure 1.1 Regional SettingFigure 1.2 Project LocationFigure 2.1 Downtown Specific Plan District MapFigure 2.2 Main Street District MapFigure 2.3 Richmond Street District
MapFigure 2.4 Grand Avenue District MapFigure 2.5 Civic Center District MapFigure 2.6 Civic Center Parking Lot ImprovementsFigure 2.7 Civic Center Public Plaza MapFigure 2.8
Potential Historic ResourcesFigure 3.1 Pedestrian Circulation MapFigure 3.2 Pedestrian Crossing MapFigure 3.3 Pedestrian Paseo MapFigure 3.4 Bicycle Circulation MapFigure
3.5 Transit Stop MapFigure 3.6 Main Street Existing Road SectionFigure 3.7 Main Street Preferred Road Section Figure 3.8 Main Street Alternative Road SectionFigure 3.9 Grand
Avenue Existing Road SectionFigure 3.10 Grand Avenue Preferred Road SectionFigure 3.11 Grand Avenue Class II Alternative Road SectionFigure 3.12 Grand Avenue
Cycle-Track Alternative Road SectionFigure 3.13 Richmond Street Existing Road SectionFigure 3.14 Richmond Street Preferred Road SectionFigure 3.15 Richmond Street
Alternative Road SectionFigure 3.16 Alley Enhancement Map . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 3.17 Parking Utilization MapsFigure 3.18 Public Parking MapFigure 4.1 Downtown
Gateways MapFigure 5.1 Water Supply Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7-7
2-5
6-6
6-17
2-12
2-142-16
2-18
2-106-10
6-20
2-222-242-336-24
2-20
3-30
s
d
r
. .
a
. .
d
. .
...
n
. . .
a
t
S
.....
t
n
e
m
p
..................6-21
o
l
e
v
e
D
.............g.............
n
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
d
l
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
u
B
e
u
n
e
v
A
d
n
a
r
G
7
-
2
e
l
b
a
Table 2-1 Permitted Use TableTable 2-2 Main Street Site Development StandardsTable 2-3 Main Street Building Development Standards Table 2-4 Richmond Street Site Development StandardsTable
2-5 Richmond Street Building Development StandardsTable 2-6 Grand Avenue Site Development StandardsTTable 2-8 Civic Center Site Development StandardsTable 2-9 Civic Center Building
Development StandardsTable 2-10 Parking Ratio TableTable 3-1 On-Street Parking Supply ComparisonsTable 6-1 Overview of Market Demand Projections (through 2040)
Table 6-2 Implementation Action Plan Table 6-3 Funding Source Categories and Examples Table 6-4 Summary of Major District-Based Value Capture Tools Table 6-5
Applicable Funding Sources Table 6-6 Examples of Grant Funding Sources Table 7-1 Downtown Design Review (DDR) Process
Introduction and Vision
1
1
1-1
INTRODUCTION AND VISION
maintaining the existing “small-town” charm and atmosphere.
Purpose and Intent
The Specific Plan envisions enhancements and beautification improvements that will revitalize the streetscape, public plazas, and pedestrian environment while
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND VISIONA.Introduction 1.The purpose of the Specific Plan is to establish a vision for future development and revitalization, beautification, improved mobility,
streetscape, and pedestrian improvements to better serve residents and visitors alike. It envisions the continuation and expansion of the existing neighborhood serving commercial and
residential uses, in an enhanced environment, while maintaining the “small-town” atmosphere. The Specific Plan carries forward the community’s goals and vision for Downtown El Segundo.
What is a Specific Plan?
CHAPTER 1 a.In the State of California, a specific plan is one of the many tools for implementing the goals and of a General Plan. Specific plans implement a city or county’s general
plan through the development of policies, programs, and regulations for a localized area and in greater detail. Specific plans are put in place to regulate distinct character areas
that cannot be regulated through general ordinance or city-wide zoning. A specific plan establishes a link between implementing policies of the General Plan and the individual development
proposals in a defined area within the City. The Downtown Specific Plan is a document designed to implement the goals and policies of the El Segundo General Plan to implement the City’s
long-term vision for the Downtown. As its primary purpose, a Specific Plan provides mechanisms to target implementation measures toward a specific planning area while preserving and
enhancing areas of historical or architectural significance. A Specific Plan provides a customized regulatory framework that contains detailed development standards and regulations,
distribution of land uses, infrastructure requirements, and implementation measures for the development of a specific geographic area. Civic-oriented, pedestrian-oriented, and mixed-use
development (housing over commercial) may be included as part of a Specific Plan. The Specific Plan is similar in nature to the Municipal Code because it deals with implementation using
development regulations. Unlike the citywide Municipal Code, Specific Plans are targeted to specific planning areas. This allows for both greater flexibility and more specificity to
focus regulations and standards to achieve specific strategies and Specific Plans take precedence over the Municipal Code regulations. The Specific Plan provisions provide a greater
level of assurance to prospective developers and the development community relative to the City’s long-term goals for a specific geographic area. Where a provision in this Specific
Plan does not address a specific condition or situation that arises, the provisions set forth in the Municipal Code shall apply. In the event of a conflict between these provisions
and the provisions of the Municipal Code, the provisions set forth in the Downtown Specific Plan shall govern.This Specific Plan governs all land within the plan boundary. Private property
is governed by land use requirements and developments standards contained within Chapter 2 and the public realm and infrastructure improvements are regulated by other chapters. The
land uses, development standards and regulations are important aspects of a Specific Plan since they implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. Actual development proposals,
building placement, and design will come through private investment following the adoption of the Specific Plan.PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
1-2
1-3
Regional Setting
Figure 1.1
INTRODUCTION AND VISION
Area
Downtown
Specific Plan
Specific Plan Area Overview
b.Location The Specific Plan area is approximately 43.8 acres in size and is in the northwest quadrant of the City of El Segundo, which is approximately 20 miles southwest from downtown
Los Angeles (see Figure 1.1 Regional Setting). Downtown El Segundo is located southwest of the interchange of the Interstate 405 Freeway (I-405) and State Route 90 (Imperial Highway),
west of Pacific Coast Highway and north of El Segundo Boulevard. The Interstate 105 Freeway (I-105) is north of the Specific Plan area, immediately north of the Imperial Highway. It
is bounded by Mariposa Avenue to the north and El Segundo Boulevard to the south. The Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is located to the north; the Los Angeles County community
of Del Aire and the City of Hawthorne are located to the east; the City of Manhattan Beach is located to the south; and the Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant, Dockweiler Beach, and Pacific
Ocean are located to the west.
Surrounding Land Uses The land uses surrounding the Specific Plan area are generally residential in nature, ranging from one to three stories in height in a fully developed urban environment.
North The El Segundo High School campus, El Segundo Public Library, and Library Park are located just north of the Specific Plan area on Main Street. The neighborhoods surrounding these
civic uses are comprised mainly of single-family dwellings, duplexes, and apartment complexes. West An area zoned Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) is located just west of the Specific
Plan area. Less than a mile from the western edge of the Specific Plan is the Pacific Ocean coastline. Both Dockweiler Beach and El Segundo Beach are primarily accessed via Grand Avenue,
which runs east-west through the city. The neighborhoods between Downtown El Segundo and the coast are comprised mainly of single-family dwellings, duplexes, and apartment complexes.South
South of El Segundo Boulevard is the Chevron Refinery, which is zoned Heavy Industrial (M-2) and covers over 1,000 acres of land. East The neighborhoods to the east of the Specific
Plan area are comprised of a mix of single-family dwellings, duplexes, and apartment complexes. The areas south and east of the Specific Plan area contain the Smoky Hollow Specific
Plan which are developed with light industrial, and office uses. El Segundo Recreation Park, located along Pine Avenue and Eucalyptus Drive, provides recreational facilities for a range
of sports, including softball, roller hockey, tennis, and basketball.
CHAPTER 1Existing Characteristics and Context The Downtown remains a small, distinct area within El Segundo and most of the Specific Plan area includes a range of neighborhood service
commercial uses including retail, restaurants, offices, and banks; and there are some existing civic uses and residential units. Existing development within the Specific Plan area
ranges from one- to three-story buildings, with many buildings located along or near the front property line at one to two-story heights and a few three-story buildings. The Specific
Plan area is generally gently sloping with some steeper topography along portions Main Street and the Marketplace Alley. The Specific Plan area is divided by two principal streets
running in a north-south orientation, Main Street and Richmond Street, and contains portions of lesser traveled Standard Street and Concord Street (see Figure 1.2 Project Location).
Two major streets cross in an east-west orientation, Grand Avenue and El Segundo Boulevard, as do sections of four smaller streets: Franklin Avenue, Holly Avenue, Pine Avenue, and
Mariposa Avenue. Main Street, Grand Avenue, and El Segundo Boulevard each connect to major, regional arterials or freeways. Main Street runs between El Segundo Boulevard and Imperial
Highway, which borders Los Angeles International Airport. El Segundo Boulevard, on the southern boundary of the Specific Plan area, connects to the I-405 Freeway and to Pacific Coast
Highway. Grand Avenue links to Pacific Coast Highway to the east and the coastline to the west. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
1-4
1-5
INTRODUCTION AND VISION
Area
Downtown
Specific Plan
Project Location
Figure 1.2
: The Specific Plan strives to
The Specific Plan proposes streetscape
: The Specific Plan provides for a range of uses
Economic Development ElementLand Use ElementCirculation Element:
preserve and improve the business environment, stabilize the economic viability of the Downtown, enhance the appearance of Downtown, and enhance the pedestrian environment while providing
the opportunity for a mix of commercial services. that will maintain the “small town” atmosphere, complement the Downtown’s historic context, create a sense of place, and encourage
landscaping and entry statements.beautification elements and an improved circulation system in the Downtown which are safe, convenient, and cost effective and can effectively accommodate
the mobility needs of bicycles, vehicles, and pedestrians.
El Segundo General Plan The General Plan is the City’s guiding document for decision making and it outlines the City’s visions and policies. The Downtown Specific Plan is generally consistent
with the General Plan and provides for more precise implementation of goals, objectives, and policies outlined within the General Plan. Highlights of how the Specific Plan furthers
General Plan goals are provided below. Please refer to Appendix A for additional information.•••
Relationship to Other Planning Documents
CHAPTER 1 B.This section briefly discusses key documents and policies considered in the formulation of the Specific Plan. El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan (2000)This Specific Plan is
an update to the Downtown Specific Plan which was adopted in 2000 with a 10-year vision. 20 years have passed, and the City is looking to confirm and enhance the vision for Downtown
El Segundo. The City of El Segundo identified the need to update the current Specific Plan to create a desired balance of uses within the Downtown to reach its optimal potential while
enhancing the small-town charm and quality environment that the residents currently enjoy. The district boundaries within the 2000 Specific Plan were analyzed and refined based upon
existing community values, expected market demand, and shared characteristics, including the vision of range of allowable uses and development standards to support the desired future
condition of the districts. The 2000 Specific Plan area was previously divided into six districts and this Specific Plan has adjusted the Specific Plan area into four distinct districts.
This Specific Plan updates the goals and objectives of the existing Plan and is based on an approximate 20-year outlook for development and growth in Downtown El Segundo. PUBLIC REVIEW
DRAFTNovember 2023
1-6
1-7
activate Downtown El Segundo
INTRODUCTION AND VISION
The Specific Plan provides for plazas and courtyards that will energize and
The Specific Plan
: The Specific Plan enhances the quality
The Specific Plan allows for a variety of
The Specific Plan requires that the current noise
Housing Element:Open Space and Recreation Element:Conservation ElementNoise Element:
housing types and uses and establishes standards and policies for residential development.addresses the Open Space and Recreation Element objectives and policies related to the development
of open space and gathering space and landscaping policies. The Specific Plan provides for the development of open space areas such as plazas and courtyards that activate the Downtown.of
the urban landscape of the Downtown, particularly the characteristics and qualities identified by the community as being valued and designates landscaping features for the El Segundo
Blue Butterfly.regulations of the Municipal Code be adhered to which address and mitigate potential noise conflicts.
••••El Segundo Municipal Code The City of El Segundo’s Municipal Code is the main regulatory document that provides specific development regulations that are applicable to individual
neighborhoods, districts, and corridors to ensure they are consistent with the General Plan.
Chapter 4: Public Realm – Placemaking and Beautification This chapter provides direction for public placemaking and beautification improvements for the entire Specific Plan area. Topics
include public plazas and gathering areas, street furnishings, landscape concepts, and gateway signage. Chapter 5: Infrastructure and Public Facilities This chapter addresses essential
infrastructure requirements for future development within the Specific Plan area, including water, sewer, stormwater, solid waste, dry utilities, schools, police, fire, parks, and other
public services.Chapter 6: Implementation This chapter provides implementation strategies and direction for achieving the goals set forth within the Specific Plan. It identifies key
future implementation programs and improvements, as well as priority, phasing, and primary responsible parties for each.Chapter 7: Administration This section describes the authority
of the Specific Plan, project review procedures, and the administrative procedures required for amendments and/or modifications to the Specific Plan.
Document Organization
CHAPTER 1 C.This Specific Plan is organized into seven chapters that discuss public improvements and streetscape guidelines, private urban form criteria, permitted land uses, development
standards, mobility and infrastructure improvements, an implementation plan, and administration processes. The following describes the contents in more detail:Chapter 1: Introduction
and Vision The introduction discusses the purpose and organization of this document and the Specific Plan area boundary. This section describes the community’s vision for the Specific
Plan area, informed by the community engagement process and public hearings. In addition, the Specific Plan’s relationship to the City’s General Plan and other pertinent City documents
and policies are discussed in this chapter.Chapter 2: Private Realm – Land Use and Development Standards The Specific Plan uses a district-based approach to govern land uses and development
standards. This chapter sets forth general provisions for development within the Specific Plan area and details the permitted land uses and development standards which are customized
for each district. The regulations within this chapter will guide growth and development in the Specific Plan area to accommodate a desired mix of uses with guidelines and standards
included to create a development form and composition that supports a vibrant, active Downtown shopping district and neighborhood.Chapter 3: Public Realm – Multimodal Mobility This
chapter provides direction for public mobility improvements for the entire Specific Plan area. Topics include mobility improvements for all modes of travel to promote an efficient and
clear path of travel providing connectivity to and within the Specific Plan area and includes recommendations for parking improvements. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
1-8
1-9
INTRODUCTION AND VISION
A word cloud from the Social PinPoint mapping activity.
The larger the word is shown, the more times it was listed by the community.
A Community Workshop was held on June
A Social Pinpoint websitewas created to obtain
:
Community Engagement Process
Social Pinpoint Community Workshop:
community input about the Specific Plan area and was open for comments from June 1 to July 18, 2022. The site included an interactive mapping activity which received 237 comments, and
a written questionnaire which received 130 responses. The mapping activity allowed the community to “like” or “dislike” a comment to inform consensus.28, 2022, to provide an overview
of the Specific Plan project and process to date and presented a summary of the existing conditions within the Specific Plan area. The workshop included an interactive Slido polling
feature that allowed the community to immediately see the voting results on the screen, and optional breakout rooms were provided for additional discussion.
D.Vision Community engagement and analysis of Specific Plan area informed the development of key planning principles and provided the foundation for the Specific Plan. 1.The Specific
Plan community outreach effort to discuss goals and objectives, the vision, opportunities and constraints, and important issues in the Downtown and included meetings with citizens,
business owners, Rotary Club members, and interested stakeholders. ••
A public Planning Commission
Planning Commission Study Session:
The progress was well received, and the meeting concluded without any recommendations for refinements to the proposed Specific Plan districts or gateway signage concepts. There was a
preference for the Central Green option at the Civic Center District and requests to include habitat areas for the El Segundo Blue Butterfly. Chapter 2, Section G, Civic Center District
reflects these recommendations.There was support for reducing travel lanes and providing traffic calming and wider sidewalks for outdoor dining in the Downtown. The Planning Commission
asked to consider narrower bike lanes to allow for more pedestrian spaces and requested that parking not be adversely affected by the bike alternatives. The roadway sections shown in
Chapter 3, Section E, Vehicular Circulation, reflect these recommendations. The Planning Commission recommended a phased implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan improvements. Chapter
6, Implementation discusses the potential funding sources/mechanisms for implementation.
Study Session was held on November 10, 2022 to discuss Specific Plan progress and key concepts. RRM Design Group presented the community outreach results, market demand highlights,
proposed Specific Plan districts, Downtown gateway signage concepts, existing parking analysis, parking management strategies and potential future parking structure locations, and the
reviewed the Opportunities Map. To receive early decision-maker input, two alternatives were presented for the Civic Center District, and streetscape enhancements were reviewed with
road section options for Grand Avenue, Main Street and Richmond Street.
•
Questions?
FOR MORE INFO:
Contact: Paul Samaras at
PSamaras@elsegundo.org
VISIT OUR PROJECT WEBSITE!
www.elsegundo.org/downtownupdate
s
r
e
b
PLANNING COMMISSION
STUDY SESSION
m
a
h
C
l
i
c
n
u
Visit the project
o
C
We want to continue to hear from you!
y
t
i
C
:
other enhancements for Downtown El Segundo.
(350 Main Street)
to the meeting date
WHEN & WHERE:
Over the summer, we have heard from the community and
DOWNTOWN
SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
have developed some preliminary concepts regarding future
land uses, streetscape beautification, improved mobility, and
Specific Plan Update at the Planning Commission meeting!
website for a Zoom link closer
Join us to learn about and provide feedback on the Downtown
NOVEMBER 10 FROM 5:30 - 7:00 PM
In-Person atVirtually via Zoom:
CHAPTER 1 Flyer from the Planning Commission Study Session PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
1-10
1-11
INTRODUCTION AND VISION
beautification and will establish a unique and inviting Downtown environment
The Specific Plan will provide direction for outdoor gathering spaces and streetscape
Vision and Planning Principles
2.The following Downtown Specific Plan vision and planning principles were formulated through extensive community engagement, review of City policies, and analysis of established conditions.
The planning principles, policies and standards included in this Specific Plan will collectively implement this shared vision.VISION Downtown is the heart of El Segundo, and its vibrant
energy will continue to provide an attractive and accessible destination for families of all ages and incomes to stay, play, and relax. The vision of this Specific Plan is to create
an economically prosperous Downtown with a mix of uses and entertainment options and cohesive elements that tie the community together. The Specific Plan’s goal is to create a balance
of uses within the Downtown to reach its optimal potential and will provide direction for streetscape beautification, outdoor gathering spaces, improved mobility, and other enhancements
that will establish a unique and inviting environment that highlights its historical and cultural roots to enrich this community destination.
– Ensure an
– Provide
– Enhance the
Designate the CoreEntertainment and Arts Streetscape Beautification
entrances and gateways into Downtown and develop the Civic Center Plaza as a focal point for the community with activities for all ages. attractive multi-use public spaces enhanced
with public art for events, entertainment, socializing, and playing.enjoyable, comfortable, and beautified public realm with high-quality amenities and additional shaded seating and
gathering areas.
Public Realm – Placemaking and Beautification (refer to Chapter 4)•••
– Improve
– Develop
– Support enhanced
Expanded MobilityPedestrians and BicyclesImproved Public Parking
and efficient mobility opportunities for walking, driving, bicycling, and transit.walkability and the pedestrian environment and encourage bicycle use with additional bicycle improvements
and amenities. a comprehensive parking plan with increased parking wayfinding signage and facilitate innovative methods for parking such as shared parking agreements.
Public Realm – Multimodal Mobility (refer to Chapter 3)•••
– Promote
– Attract
– Embrace the
– Create aesthetically
Heart of El SegundoEconomic RevitalizationOutdoor DiningResidential Opportunities
unique small-town “village” character, pedestrian friendly environment, and historic charm of Downtown and enhance its identity to reflect local interests.investment and increase the
economic vitality of Downtown to foster an active center serving residents, visitors, and local workers.pleasing and functional outdoor dining opportunities. a range of housing options
with opportunities for all incomes.
Private Realm – Land Use and Development Standards (refer to Chapter 2)••••
CHAPTER 1PLANNING PRINCIPLES Crafted from community input, the following planning principles shape the guidelines and standards contained in the Specific Plan.PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember
2023
1-12
Private Realm -
2
2
Land Use and Development Standards
2-1
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Promote a range of housing options with opportunities for all incomes.
Attract investment and increase the economic vitality of Downtown to foster an active
Embrace the unique small-town “village” character, pedestrian friendly environment, and
Create aesthetically pleasing and functional outdoor dining opportunities.
Heart of El Segundo – Economic Revitalization – Outdoor Dining – Residential Opportunities –
historic charm of Downtown and enhance its identity to reflect local interests.center serving residents, visitors, and local workers.
••••
Planning Principles Related to Private Realm – Land Use and Development Standards:
CHAPTER 2: PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDSA.Introduction The private realm includes all privately owned property in the Downtown Specific Plan area. This chapter
provides direction for development through regulatory tools and guidelines established to shape the design character envisioned by the community. Permitted land uses and development
standards are regulatory tools that guide new development as well as the re-use of existing buildings. They apply to building additions, exterior remodels, relocations, or new construction
requiring a building permit within the Downtown Specific Plan area. The land use and development standards presented in this chapter will help guide change toward achieving the overall
Downtown vision and will provide direction for the types of uses that should occur, and how these uses will be allowed to develop in each area of the Downtown. They are also designed
to reinforce the Planning Principles established within Chapter 1 of this document.
District Based ApproachUsing This Chapter
El Segundo Downtown Districts
CHAPTER 2 B.This Specific Plan utilized a mixed-use zoning approach to re-invigorate the Downtown as a focal point of activity, as advocated by the General Plan, and to meet the goals
envisioned by the community to develop an inviting and pedestrian-friendly realm. In contrast to the single-use zoning based on land use type, this Specific Plan is based on geographic
areas called planning districts and each district has a distinctive vision and a customized range of uses and development standards that support the preferred future vision for the
Downtown. The district-based approach allows a “mixed-use” zoning approach where the desired activities and building forms dictate what happens where and what development looks like.C.Before
new development occurs, this chapter must be reviewed to determine which district the property is located within and whether the proposed land use is allowed. Once it is determined
that a land use is allowed, refer to the specific district development standards based upon your property location. Projects within the Downtown Specific Plan must also comply with
the applicable requirements of the ESMC. 1.The District boundaries were determined based upon shared characteristics including land use commonalities, parcel size, proximity to community-wide
destinations, and redevelopment potential. A hybrid approach to zoning is used which combines form-based development standards with a selection of compatible uses that have been tailored
for each Specific Plan District (see Figure 2.1, Downtown Specific Plan District Map).PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-2
2-3
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Downtown Specific Plan District Map
Figure 2.1
Primary uses not listed in Table 2-1 are not permitted unless All existing nonconforming uses that are listed as prohibited Use definitions are contained within ESMC Section 15-1-6 and
determined to be substantially similar to a listed use by the Director. Where a proposed land use is not listed, but is largely similar to one of the listed uses, the process set forth
in the ESMC Chapter 15-22 shall apply. in this chapter shall be subject to the provisions outlined in ESMC Chapter 15-21. Appendix B of this Specific Plan.
•••
requires discretionary approval
requires discretionary approval
refers to a use that is incidental and
is allowed without discretionary approval and
are specifically not allowed in a particular
Land Use Regulations
A Permitted Use (P) An Administrative Use Permit (AUP) A Conditional Permitted Use (CUP)An Accessory Use (A) Prohibited Uses (—)Uses only permitted above or behind primary street ground
floor uses
subject to all applicable provisions of this Specific Plan. authorized by the Director of Community Development and subject to the requirements outlined in ESMC Chapter 22, Section 15–22-3.
in the form of a Conditional Use Permit authorized by the Planning Commission and subject to the requirements outlined in ESMC Chapter 23, Section 15–23-2. subordinate to a primary
use of the land or building and located on the same lot with the primary use or building, as outlined in ESMC Chapter 23, Section 15-10-3.zoning district. are allowed in these areas.
CHAPTER 2 2.Land Uses are selected to encourage reinvestment and revitalization of each Downtown District consistent with its vision and in support of the planning principles that guide
Specific Plan. Each District contains a list of Permitted Uses as well as others that may be subject to special conditions regarding the location, operation, design, or special permitting
requirements. Following an application submittal, the Director of Community Development or his or her designee shall make a determination as to whether the proposed use is permitted,
conditionally permitted, prohibited, or allowed as a temporary or accessory use to a permitted use. Any use not specifically listed in Table 2-1, Permitted Land Use Table, shall be
interpreted as not allowed in the Downtown Specific Plan area, except where deemed permissible per Chapter 7, Section D.4, Allowable Land Uses. Refer to Chapter 7 for a list of projects
that might require Design Review approval.••••••PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-4
2-5
PP
A
----------
P P
District
Civic Center
(Continued on next page)
PP
PA
----
P P
AUP
CUP CUP
District
Grand Avenue
DISTRICTS
PPPPPPP
A
AUPAUPAUPAUPAUP
CUP
District
Richmond Street
PPPPP
A
------
AUPAUPAUPAUPAUPAUPAUPAUP
P (1)P (1)P (1)P (1)
District
-8.
Main Street
4
hapter
C
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
SMC
E
n Entertainment Permit pursuant to
a
ubject to
s
re
a
a
ities
e
= Administrative Use Permit
= Conditional Use Permit
Uses only permitted above or behind primary street ground floor uses
= Prohibited Use
=
)
= Accessory Use Entertainment Facil
= Permitted Us
(1
LAND USES
Table 2-1: Permitted Use Table Alcohol Sales, Off-SiteAlcohol Sales, On-Site without Food Service (Bars)Alcohol Sales, On-Site with Food ServiceArtistic or Cultural SevicesAssembly
HallsBed and Breakfast InnBrewery and Alcohol Production (including on-site consumption or restaurant) Commercial, Financial InstitutionsCommercial, Retail SalesCommercial, Retail
ServicesDaycare CentersDwelling, Multiple-FamilyDwelling, Senior Citizen HousingEntertainment (Live)
P A AUP CUP (--)
PP
--------------
District
Civic Center
(Continued on next page)
PP
PPP
------
P
District
Grand Avenue
DISTRICTS
PPPP
----
P
P (1)
District
Richmond Street
PPP
------
P (1)P (1)P (1)P (1)
District
-8.
Main Street
4
hapter
C
15-
SMC
E
rea.
a
a
ross floor
g
f
(Continued)
o
n Entertainment Permit pursuant to
f.
a
s.
,000
5
ubject to
s
ceed
re
a
ex
ot
n
ities
(Subject to design review and compliance with Chapter 2,
b
e
= Administrative Use Permit = Conditional Use Permit
Uses only permitted above or behind primary street ground floor uses
= Prohibited Use
=
)
= Permitted Us= Accessory Use
Entertainment FacilFitness Centers may
(1
LAND USES
Table 2-1: Permitted Use Table
Fitness CenterHotelLive/ WorkMovie Theater and Entertainment FacilitiesMuseumNightclubsOffices, GeneralOffice, Medical-Dental Outdoor Dining Section H.8 of this Specific Plan and El
Segundo Municipal Code §15-2-16, Outdoor Dining Areas)
P A AUP CUP (--)
CHAPTER 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-6
2-7
PPPPP A
P
----
AUP
District
Civic Center
P, A, AUP, CUP
PP A
P
------
P P
P
District
Grand Avenue
DISTRICTS
PPPP A
--
P P P
P (1)
District
nformation.
Richmond Street
i
dditional
a
PPP A
----
P P
or
P (1)P (1) f
District
6
Main Street
P, A, AUP, CUPP, A, AUP, CUPP, A, AUP, CUP
hapter
C
to
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
efer
R
rogram.
P
arklet's
P
egundo
S
l
E
d
(Continued)
)
n adopted
a
(
ermitted, subject to
e
p
re
a
c
= Administrative Use Permit = Conditional Use Permit
Uses only permitted above or behind primary street ground floor uses
= Prohibited Use
=
)
Parklets
= Permitted Us= Accessory Use
(1
LAND USES
Table 2-1: Permitted Use Table OTHER
ParkletsPublic FacilitiesRecreational FacilitiesRestaurant, Food To GoRestaurant, Full ServiceStudio/Sound Stages and Support FacilitiesTemporary Outdoor Retail Sales EventsTheaterUnderground
Parking Facilities and Parking Structures Any use customarily incidental to a permitted use Other similar uses approved by the Director of Community Development, as provided by Chapter
22 (Title 15 Zoning Regulations )
P A AUP CUP (--)
Development Standards
15-2-3 Exceptions to Building Heights15-2-4 Height restrictions for walls and fences15-2-9 Screening15-2-10 Temporary BuildingsChapter 18: Signs
3.Development standards constitute the constraints for a project’s building envelope in which new construction or a structural remodel is permitted. They provide site planning and building
requirements such as building placement, maximum heights, setbacks, relationship to street and sidewalk and required parking to improve the overall aesthetic appearance and to serve
as an incentive for private reinvestment in Downtown. This document is a regulatory document adopted by ordinance. In any instance where the Specific Plan conflicts with the requirement
of the ESMC, the Specific Plan provisions will take precedence. Where the Specific Plan is silent on a topic, the ESMC requirements remain in force. The following sections of the ESMC
should be consulted, but is not a comprehensive list: •••••
Development standards provide site planning and building requirements such as building placement, maximum heights, setbacks, and the relationship to street and sidewalk
CHAPTER 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-8
2-9
Main Street District Map
Figure 2.2
District
Main Street
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Main Street District
Promote pedestrian-oriented enhanced streetscapes with buildings Site design standards minimize curb cuts along the street frontage Provide for a variety of uses including retail sales
and restaurants at Incorporate standards that maintain and enhance the historic
oriented toward the street with minimized pedestrian and vehicle conflicts, wide sidewalks to allow for outdoor dining, gathering areas, and additional pedestrian amenities. and streetscape
policies promote additional pedestrian-oriented enhancements such as street lighting and places to sit and rest while enjoying the shade from the lush tree canopy.the street edge with
office and residential units permitted above and behind the ground floor Main Street frontage. Downtown character with lower building heights along the Main Street frontage, additional
building form and articulation criteria to emulate typical twenty-five foot lot widths, additional transparency requirements on the ground floor to enhance the pedestrian experience,
and buildings located at the street edge with parking located behind the building and accessed from the alley.
D.1.Introduction The Main Street District is considered the Downtown core or “heart”. Its focus is to serve residents, local employees, and visitors within the most pedestrian oriented
environment – narrow street width and wide sidewalks, high volume pedestrian-oriented uses at the ground floor, and building design that emulates a historic building pattern. The district
runs north-south along Main Street (Main Street 300-500 blocks) between Grand Avenue and Mariposa Avenue and is bounded by the alleys to the east and west (see Figure 2.2, Main Street
District Map). The district contains a wide variety of commercial uses and abuts Multi-Family Residential (R-2 and R-3) uses to the east and west across the adjacent alleyways.The Main
Street District will: ••••
(Continued on next page)
The building frontage must be oriented toward Main Street. Required on-site parking shall not be located between the building and the Main Street property line.Zero setback at ground
floor maximum. Ten feet maximum permitted for pedestrian-oriented plazas or outdoor dining, subject to design review.
1.2.5,000 square feet minimum.Twenty-five feet minimum for new lots.1.2.None required.None required.No limit. 250 square feet.
(refer
Front/Street Adjacent Yard(refer to Interpretation 2-2B)Side YardRear Yard
Table 2-2: Main Street Site Development Standards
Building Placement and Orientation to Interpretation 2-2A)Lot AreaLot Width SetbacksDensity and FARMinimum Unit Size
e
p
o
T
l
E
e
E
v
T
R
n
E
T
E
E
S
R
g
N
T
n
I
i
S
A
d
l
M
iN
I
u
A
B
M
Site Development Standards
10
BUILDING SETBACK INTERPRETATION 2-2B:Ten foot maximum setback is permitted for front/ street adjacent yards if pedestrian-oriented plazas or outdoor dining is provided in the setback
CHAPTER 2 2.Intentional site planning and design ensures a pedestrian oriented traditional downtown environment. The following standards support the vision for the Main Street District.
BUILDING PLACEMENT INTERPRETATION 2-2A:Buildings shall be located and oriented toward Main Street PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-10
2-11
pedestrian amenities shall be provided
Common open space with active or passive
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Alley access required.Parking shall be provided in the rear of the site, or off-site via in-lieu fee or shared parking agreement per ESMC.
1.2.Refer to Section H. Supplemental Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines, Parking.Fifty square-feet.Twenty-five square-feet designed as an active or passive common space amenity. Rooftop
decks may satisfy this requirement.None required.Refer to Section H. Supplemental Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines.
Table 2-2: Main Street Site Development Standards (Continued)
Parking LocationParking RequirementsResidential Private Open Space Per UnitResidential Common Open Space Per UnitResidential Recreation Facility Per UnitAdditional Requirements
.
Thirty feet maximum at front property line.Forty-five feet maximum, ten feet from front property line.Forty-five feet maximum at rear property line.Height shall be calculated from existing
grade at the adjacent property line.See Section 15-2-3 of the ESMC for exceptions to building height.Forty-five percent minimum transparency for first-floor front façade.At least seventy-five
percent of the façade between two and eight feet above the sidewalk shall be glazing.Refer to Section H.2 Supplemental Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines for additional requirements
1.2.3.4.5.Fourteen feet minimum for ground floor commercial use.1.2.3.Refer to Section H. Supplemental Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines.
(refer
Table 2-3: Main Street Building Development Standards
Building HeightPlate Height to Interpretation 2-3A)First-Floor Glazing Facing Main StreetAdditional Requirements
r
r
o
o
o
l
o
l
F
F
d
d
e
n
h
o
s
i
c
n
e
i
Ground Floor Finished Floor
S
F
Building Development Standards
Building form and massing support the desired character and use of an area. The pedestrian experience and aesthetic quality of a building is defined by these standards.Glazing shall
be provided on the first-floor of buildings facing Main Street
CHAPTER 2 3.PLATE HEIGHT INTERPRETATION 2-3A:Minimum plate height for ground floor commercial uses PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-12
2-13
Richmond Street District Map
Richmond
Street District
Figure 2.3
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Richmond Street District
Celebrate the traditional “Old Town” character and entertainment uses Foster an eclectic mixed-use environment, allowing for more flexibility Provide professional office and stand-alone
residential uses on the Include site design standards to minimize curb cuts along the street Incorporate standards that maintain and enhance the historic
within the area by encouraging restaurants with outdoor dining and art and culture related uses such as filming related uses, arts and entertainment, and design studios. than the Main
Street District with a broader mixture of commercial uses including breweries and tasting rooms, entertainment, professional, medical and dental offices. ground floor fronting Richmond
Street. frontage and streetscape policies to promote additional pedestrian-oriented enhancements such as street lighting and places to sit and rest while enjoying the shade from the
lush tree canopy.Downtown character with additional building form and articulation criteria to emulate typical twenty-five foot lot widths, additional transparency requirements on the
ground floor to enhance the pedestrian experience, and buildings located at the street edge with parking located behind the building and accessed from the alley.
The Richmond Street District will: •••••
E.1.Introduction The Richmond Street District is generally located along Richmond Street (Richmond Street 100-300 blocks) and is situated one block west of and parallel to Main Street
(see Figure 2.3, Richmond Street District Map). This district is similar in nature to the Main Street district, and it contains some of the oldest commercial buildings in the city,
including the Old Town Music Hall. The district abuts Multi-Family Residential (R-3) uses to the west across the alley. It is an eclectic mixed-use environment of commercial and residential
uses.
(Continued on next page)
Building shall be oriented toward Richmond Street. Required on-site parking shall not be located between the building and the Richmond Street property line.Zero setback at ground floor
maximum. Ten feet maximum permitted for pedestrian-oriented plazas, outdoor dining, or residential common open space, subject to design review.
1.2.Five thousand square feet minimum.Twenty-five feet minimum for new lots.1.2.None required.None required.No limit. Two hundred and fifty square feet.
(refer to
Front/Street Adjacent Yard Interpretation 2-4B)Side YardRear Yard
Table 2-4: Richmond Street Site Development Standards
Building Placement and Orientation(refer to Interpretation 2-4A) Lot AreaLot Width SetbacksDensity and FARMinimum Unit Size
T
e
E
T
p
E
E
o
R
lE
T
e
R
S
v
T
n
S
D
E
N
D
O
g
N
n
M
O
i
H
d
M
C
l
I
i
H
Ru
C
I
B
R
Site Development Standards
10
BUILDING SETBACK INTERPRETATION 2-4B:Ten foot maximum setback is permitted for front/ street adjacent yards if pedestrian-oriented plazas, outdoor dining, or residential common open
space is provided within the setback
CHAPTER 2 2.Intentional site planning and design ensures a pedestrian oriented traditional downtown environment. The following standards support the vision for the Richmond Street District.
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
BUILDING PLACEMENT INTERPRETATION 2-4A:Buildings shall be oriented toward Richmond Street
2-14
2-15
passive common open space
Residential units shall provide active or
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
be physically or visually accessible to the residents, be a minimum of five feet in both length and width, and include a minimum of fifty percent of landscaping.
Alley access required.Parking shall be provided in the rear of the site, or off-site via in-lieu fee or shared parking agreement per ESMC.a.b.c.
1.2.Refer to Section H. Supplemental Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines, Parking.All required common open space must: Fifty square-feet.Twenty-five square-feet designed as an active
or passive common space amenity. Rooftop decks may satisfy this requirement.None required.Refer to Section H. Supplemental Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines.
Residential Private Open Space Per UnitResidential Common Open Space Per UnitResidential Recreation Facility Per Unit
Table 2-4: Richmond Street Site Development Standards (Continued)
Parking LocationParking RequirementsOpen SpaceAdditional Requirements
.
Forty-five feet maximum. Height shall be calculated from existing grade at the adjacent property line. See ESMC Section 15-2-3 for exceptions to building height.Thirty percent minimum
transparency for first-floor front façade.The bottom of first-floor window glazing shall not be higher than three feet above the adjacent sidewalk.Refer to Section H.2 Supplemental
Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines for additional requirements
1.2.3.Fourteen feet minimum for ground floor commercial use.1.2.3.Refer to Section H. Supplemental Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines.
(refer to
Table 2-5: Richmond Street Building Development Standards
Building HeightPlate Height(refer to Interpretation 2-5A)First-Floor Glazing Facing Richmond Street Interpretation 2-5B)Additional Requirements
r
r
r
r
o
o
o
o
o
o
l
o
l
o
l
F
l
F
F
F
d
d
d
d
e
e
n
n
h
h
u
s
o
s
i
i
o
c
rn
n
i
e
i
T
G
F
S
F
E
E
R
T
S
D
N
O
M
H
C
I
R
Standards
Building Development
FIRST-FLOOR GLAZING INTERPRETATION 2-5B:Buildings facing Richmond Street shall have at least thirty percent transparency along first-floor front façade
3.Building form and massing support the desired character and use of an area. The pedestrian experience and aesthetic quality of a building is defined by these standards.
CHAPTER 2 PLATE HEIGHT INTERPRETATION 2-5A:Minimum plate height for ground floor commercial uses PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-16
2-17
Grand Avenue District Map
District
Grand Avenue
Figure 2.4
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Grand Avenue District
Provide an opportunity to accommodate an increased demand for Support a vibrant Downtown with places for people to live, work, and Promote additional connectivity and Downtown character
with
office and residential uses with the maximum building heights permitted. play and provide community amenities such as publicly accessible open space and enhanced pedestrian access in
and around an individual project site.enhanced and unified street scape amenities, pedestrian crossing areas, wayfinding and gateway signage and identity, buildings rather than parking
located at the street edge, and ground floor design criteria to establish additional window and door transparency along Main Street and Grand Avenue.
F.1.Introduction The Grand Avenue District is generally located along the southern side of Grand Avenue from Marketplace Alley to Eucalyptus Drive and contains portions of Main Street
and Standard Avenue (Main Street 100-200 blocks and portions of Standard Street 200-300 blocks). The Grand Avenue District serves as a gateway from the west entry of the City of El
Segundo to the Downtown core. Several parcels are underutilized and larger than those located in other Districts thus providing the highest redevelopment opportunity within the Specific
Plan area (see Figure 2.4, Grand Avenue District Map).The Grand Avenue District will:•••
(Continued on next page)
Building shall be oriented toward Grand Avenue and/or Main Street. One-hundred foot frontage minimum for new lots. Individual lots less than one-hundred (100) feet of frontage, and
under common ownership with a neighboring lot, shall submit a comprehensive development application including all parcels within the minimum lot width criteria. A maximum of one vehicle
access point shall be provided from Grand Avenue. Additional access may be provided from alley or side streets.Provide adequate access and facilities for various modes of transit,
as required by the City’s Transportation Demand Management Program in ESMC Chapter 15-16. Provide pedestrian access between buildings and transit facilities located on site and/or off
site, if within adjoining public rights-of-way. If the building is part of a multi-building development project, then safe and convenient pedestrian access shall be provided between
buildings.Surface parking areas shall not be located adjacent to Grand Avenue or Main Street. Surface parking areas shall be located behind the building.Parking structures shall incorporate
first floor commercial or residential lobby when fronting Grand Avenue or Main Street. Access to parking structures is prohibited from Main Street.
1.Ten thousand square feet minimum.1.2.None required.None required.None required.No limit.Two hundred and fifty square feet.1.2.3.1.2.
Front/Street Adjacent YardSide YardRear Yard
Table 2-6: Grand Avenue Site Development Standards
Building Placement and Orientation Lot AreaLot Width SetbacksDensity and FARMinimum Unit SizeAccessParking Location
Site Development
Standards
CHAPTER 2 2.Intentional site planning and design ensures a pedestrian oriented traditional downtown environment. The following standards support the vision for the Grand Avenue District.
Site planning and design ensures a pedestrian oriented Downtown environment PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-18
2-19
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
be physically or visually accessible to the residents, be a minimum of fifteen feet in both length and width,include a minimum of fifty percent of softscape landscaping, and include
seating, as well as other pedestrian amenities, such as decorative lighting, planters, fountains or water features, distinctive paving, public art, landscaping, and bicycle racks.
A minimum of seventy-five percent of parking shall be required on-site. Any parking not provided on-site shall be satisfied via in-lieu fee or shared parking agreement per ESMC.Refer
to Section H. Supplemental Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines, Parking.Shall not be achieved by the utilization of parking areas, driveways, service areas.Interior side and rear setbacks
may be considered as required open spaces and recreation facilities.Up to fifty percent may be satisfied within a rooftop deck.All required common open space shall: a.b.c.d.Ten percent
minimum of the lot area.Up to one-third of the required landscape area may be hardscape or plaza. Parking is not permitted within this area.Ten percent of the required landscape area
can be met through use of pervious paving, and may include parking in this area. This pervious paving is in addition to the hardscape or plaza area listed above.Landscaping must be
provided as required by ESMC Section 15-2-14 and Chapter 15-15A.
1.2.1.2.3.4.Fifty square-feet.One-hundred square-feet designed as an active or passive common space amenity. Thirty square-feet.1.2.3.4.Refer to Section H. Supplemental Area-Wide Standards
and Guidelines.
Residential Private Open Space Per UnitResidential Common Open Space Per UnitResidential Recreation Facility Per Unit
Table 2-6: Grand Avenue Site Development Standards (Continued)
Parking RequirementsOpen SpaceLandscapingAdditional Requirements
.
30 feet maximum at front property line.45 feet maximum, 10 feet from front property line.45 feet maximum at rear property line.
Sixty (60) feet maximum, with the exception of properties with frontage along Main Street. For properties fronting on Main Street height limit will be as follows: a.b.c.Height shall
be calculated from existing grade at the adjacent property line.See ESMC Section 15-2-3 for exceptions to building heightThirty percent minimum transparency for first-floor front façade.The
bottom of first-floor window glazing shall not be higher than three feet above the adjacent sidewalk.Refer to Section H.2 Supplemental Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines for additional
requirements
1.2.3.4.Fourteen feet minimum for ground floor commercial use.1.2.3.Refer to Section H. Supplemental Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines.
Table 2-7: Grand Avenue Building Development Standards
Building HeightPlate Height(refer to Interpretation 2-7A)Street Facing First-Floor Glazing(refer to Interpretation 2-7B)Additional Requirements
r
r
o
o
o
l
t
o
l
F
n
F
e
g
d
r
d
n
e
i
a
n
h
z
p
o
s
a
s
i
l
c
n
n
e
iG
Ground Floor Finished Floor
a
S
F
r
T
Building Development
PLATE HEIGHT INTERPRETATION 2-7A:Minimum plate height for ground floor commercial uses
CHAPTER 2 3.Standards Building form and massing support the desired character and use of an area. The pedestrian experience and aesthetic quality of a building is defined by these standards.
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
STREET FACING GLAZING INTERPRETATION 2-7B:Minimum percent transparency for first-floor front façades
2-20
2-21
District
Civic Center District Map
Civic Center
Figure 2.5
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Civic Center District
Expand and consolidate existing uses to include governmental Allow for activities for all ages with enhanced and flexible multi-Enhance opportunities for outdoor entertainment and temporary
offices and public safety facilities, recreational uses, outdoor entertainment and temporary events, outdoor retail uses, and a location for a future public parking structure.use outdoor
gathering areas. events and infuse outdoor retail uses such as newsstands, coffee carts, flower stands, vendors, and food trucks.
G.1.Introduction Located centrally in the Specific Plan area, this district includes City Hall, the El Segundo Police Department, the El Segundo Fire Department, and existing public
plaza and open spaces (see Figure 2.5, Civic Center District Map). The Farmer’s Market is held every Thursday night on Main Street and vendors set up booths in the roadway. The existing
plaza and open spaces at the Civic Center complex offer opportunities to activate and reinvigorate this area as a central public gathering hub and add vibrancy to the north end of Main
Street. The underutilized surface parking areas along Grand Avenue provide an opportunity for a public parking structure that would allow for street parking to be reused for pedestrian
seating and gathering spaces in key locations throughout the Downtown. Reduced travel lanes on Main Street will provide for increased pedestrian uses and streetscape improvements along
the Main Street frontage. The Civic Center Plaza should serve as connecting hub between the south and north parts of Main Street. The Civic Center District will:•••
(Continued on next page)
A maximum of one vehicle access point shall be provided from Grand Avenue and from Holly Avenue.Vehicular access from Main Street is not permitted.Access is permitted along Standard
and not limited.Surface parking areas shall not be located adjacent to Grand Avenue or Main Street. Surface parking areas shall be located behind the building.All parking required shall
be located on-site or in a designated City parking facility. Refer to Section H. Supplemental Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines, Parking.
Building shall be oriented toward Grand Avenue and/or Main Street. None required. None required. None required. None required.None required.No limit.1.2.3.1.1.2.
Front/Street Adjacent YardSide YardRear Yard
Table 2-8: Civic Center Site Development Standards Building Placement and Orientation Lot AreaLot Width SetbacksDensity and FARAccessParking LocationParking Requirements
Site Development Standards
CHAPTER 2 2.Intentional site planning and design ensures a pedestrian oriented traditional Downtown environment. The following standards support the vision for the Civic Center District.
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
Site planning and design ensures a pedestrian oriented and active Downtown environment
2-22
2-23
Public Plaza
E
V
A
D
N
Recommended
A
R
G
may be hardscape or plaza
MAIN ST
STANDARD ST
Civic Center Parking Lot Improvements
Recommended Future Parking Structure
HOLLY AVE
Figure 2.6
Up to seventy-five percent of the required landscape area
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Twenty-five percent minimum of the lot area.Up to seventy-five percent of the required landscape area may be hardscape or plaza. Parking is not permitted within this area.Ten percent
of the required landscape area can be met through use of pervious paving, and may include parking in this area. This pervious paving is in addition to the hardscape or plaza area listed
above.Landscaping must be provided as required by Section 15-2-14 and Chapter 15-15A of this title.
Refer to Civic Center District Public Plaza Development Standards in Section G.4.1.2.3.4.Refer to Section H. Supplemental Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines.
Public Parking Recommendations
Table 2-8: Civic Center Site Development Standards (Continued)
Open SpaceLandscapingAdditional Requirements
3.The Civic Center District includes two surface parking lots for City Staff and the public, and there is a portion of the parking lot on Standard Street by Grand Avenue which is gated
and restricted to City vehicle parking. A new public parking structure is recommended to replace a portion of the existing surface parking along Grand Avenue. The new parking structure
should be open to the public and continue to provide City staff parking with restricted access to City vehicles. The first floor uses of the parking structure fronting Grand Avenue
and Main Street should incorporate civic uses and public services, or provide public open space or courtyards. Additionally, a public plaza is suggested at the corner of Main Street
and Grand Avenue to provide a new community gathering space and enhance this primary intersection. Refer to Section G.4, Public Plaza Development Standards, and Parking Strategies in
Chapter 3 for additional information.
.
Sixty feet maximum. Height shall be calculated from existing grade at the adjacent property line. See ESMC Section 15-2-3 for exceptions to building height.All glazing facing Main Street
and Grand Avenue shall be transparent glass which provides a minimum visibility of light transparency/transmittance level of fifty percent. Refer to Section H.2 Supplemental Area-Wide
Standards and Guidelines for additional requirements
1.2.3.No minimum required.1.2.Refer to Section H. Supplemental Area-Wide Standards and Guidelines.
Table 2-9: Civic Center Building Development Standards
Building HeightPlate HeightStreet Facing First-Floor GlazingAdditional Requirements
Building development standards enhance the desired character and use of the Civic Center District
Standards
Building Development
CHAPTER 2 4.Building form and massing support the desired character and use of an area. The pedestrian experience and aesthetic quality of a building is defined by these standards. PUBLIC
REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-24
2-25
E
V
A
D
N
A
R
G
Include interpretive signage to educate the public about native plants and the El Segundo Blue Butterfly
MAIN ST
Civic Center Public Plaza Map
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
STANDARD ST
Figure 2.7
HOLLY AVE
STANDARD STSTANDARD STSTANDARD STSTANDARD STSTANDARD STSTANDARD STSTANDARD ST
Recommended Public Plaza Enhancement Areas
Provide gathering spaces for outdoor entertainment and events
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Public Plaza Development Standards
and allow for activities for all ages with enhanced and flexible multi-use outdoor gathering areas. habitat areas for the El Segundo Blue Butterfly along with interpretive signage to
educate the public about California native plants and the Blue Butterfly (refer to Chapter 4, Section E.2, Landscaping, for additional information).drought-tolerant plants.to entice
visitors to take a walk or picnic and strategically locate focal points such as public art and accent planting.reading) and include more active uses (such as exercise equipment and/
or a children’s play area).or cultural kiosk with information about the City and key Downtown destinations.
Provide gathering spaces for outdoor entertainment and events IncludeErigonium parvifolium, Sea Cliff Buckwheat to provide Create a beautiful green space with shade trees, native
and Include shaded seating areas with gazebos, benches, and tables Allow for passive and relaxing activities (such as chess and Include a “Downtown El Segundo” sign and a historical
5.Three areas within the Civic Center District have the potential to be vibrant community plaza spaces that serve a variety of users with many interests. A redesign of these underutilized
and dated spaces will provide opportunities for pedestrian gathering within a range of spaces designed to support activities such as outdoor seating, concerts and events, socializing,
lounging, playing, and celebrating with friends and neighbors (see Figure 2.7, Civic Center Public Plaza Map). The Civic Center Plaza should serve as a connecting hub between the north
and south parts of Main Street.The redesign of the Civic Center public plazas shall: 1.2.3.4.5.6.
outdoor movies.fireplaces.or fountain.Provide lighting for nighttime activities, security, and aesthetic interest. Up lighting of trees and/or string lights or other accent lighting
elements are encouraged.Be visually open and oriented towards the street. Provide pedestrian connections to any street and be designed to seamlessly integrate into the sidewalk on Main
Street.Incorporate trellises, pergola and other vertical element to draw users into the space.Provide additional pedestrian amenities such as benches and bike racks facing the street
to maximize social interaction. Incorporate shade elements such as tree canopy, shade sails, or trellises. Provide seating in varying sizes and configurations to allow for individual
quiet reflection and larger group discussions. Elements may include informal seating options such as mounds of grass, steps, low seat walls, or raised planters to increase overall seating
capacity.
Provide an outdoor stage or amphitheater for music events and Consider focal points such as public art, fire pits, and/ or outdoor Integrate an inclusive children’s play area or feature,
i.e. boulders
7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.
Provide seating in a variety of sizes and configurations
Provide an outdoor stage or amphitheater for music events or outdoor movies
CHAPTER 2 Integrate an inclusive children’s play area or feature PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-26
2-27
Standards are specifications that the community
. Guidelines provide additional information to assist
Standards.Guidelines
considers essential to the creation and preservation of a high quality, sustainable and coherent city. Conformance with Standards is mandatory. Such provisions are indicated using the
words “shall,” “must,” “is required,” and “is/is not permitted”. Applicants must review and incorporate all applicable standards. Reviewers shall ensure consistency between the project
and the regulations/standards as applicable.the designers with fulfilling the intent of the Specific Plan. Guidelines pertain to issues of visual character and aesthetics. Conformance
with Guidelines is recommended, especially to ensure the swiftest possible approval. Although conformance with Guidelines is recommended, developers are permitted to propose alternative
design solutions if they can show that such design solutions meet the overall objectives of the Specific Plan. Guidelines are indicated using the words “should,” “may,” or “is/are encouraged.”
••
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Supplemental Area-Wide
H.Standards and Guidelines 1.Introduction This section contains standards that apply to all private property within the entire Specific Plan area. The future urban form of Downtown
El Segundo will be established by providing opportunities for development that adheres to the following customized context-sensitive development standards in this chapter, along with
the placemaking design guidelines and public realm enhancements in Chapters 3 and 4. Projects shall comply with the development standards contained within this chapter, and the intent
of the guidelines. Opportunities for development will be established to shape the future urban form of Downtown El Segundo
T
E
E
R
T
S
BUILDING WALL MODULATION INTERPRETATION 2-A:
foot variation in wall plane offset for a minimum of ten feet in length
Front building walls shall not exceed fifty feet in length without at least a five
A change in wall plane – recessed or projecting.Wall articulation/additional detail around the entry.
Projecting element above the entry.
public sidewalk.more of the following design elements:a.b.c.
Buildings shall have a primary entrance door adjacent to the Building entrances and storefronts shall incorporate with one or
Primary Entrance 1.2.
.
Building Form and Articulation
in wall plane offset for a minimum of ten feet in length (refer to Interpretation 2-A)traditional twenty-five foot building width, irrespective of the building’s total width. New construction
of infill buildings that are wider than this shall be broken down into a series of structural bays or components.articulation, shall be integrated into every wall surface. Blank wall
shall be avoided. with the same materials as the primary building materials.parapet height.as cornice, cap, or similar detail. It shall convey a sense of permanence and the interior
side, or any screened equipment shall not be visible from public view.
Fifty feet maximum length without at least a five foot variation Building materials and articulation shall be applied to replicate Variation in massing, roof form, and wall planes,
as well as Outdoor storage and equipment shall be enclosed and designed Fifty feet maximum length without a variation in roof eve, ridge, or Flat roofs shall include a parapet with
a detail element such
CHAPTER 2 2.Building form and massing support the desired character and use of an area. The pedestrian experience and aesthetic quality of a building is defined by these standards.Building
Wall Modulation – Front 1.2.Building Wall Modulation - Side and Rear 1.2.Roofline Variation 1.2.PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-28
2-29
Potential Historic Resources
GRAND
Figure 2.8
MAIN ST
Properties that appear to be eligible as historical resourcesProperties that appear to be eligible as a historical district
The Old Town Music Hall (140 W. Richmond Street) was built in 1921 and is a rare remaining example of a theater that was originally a live performance venue called the State Theater
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Historic Resources
All glazing shall be transparent glass which provides a minimum visibility of light transparency/transmittance level of fifty percent.At least seventy-five percent of the glass area
must be unobstructed by signage, including advertisement, screens, and window coverings.Reflective glass is prohibited.Metal garage doors, folding or exterior mounted security screens
or other security features which detract from the street appearance are prohibited. Awnings shall be individually mounted above the window or door.
105 W. Grand Avenue (built 1928)140 W. Richmond Street (built 1921)203 Richmond Street (built 1925)218-220 Richmond Street (built 1915)
Street Facing Glazing 1.2.3.4.5.3.The Specific Plan area contains four individual properties that appear to be eligible as historical resources (see Figure 2.8, Potential Historic Resources):••••Addi
tionally, there are twenty-seven properties on the 100 and 200 blocks of Richmond Street that appear to be collectively eligible as a potential historic district as shown on Figure 2.8,
Potential Historic Resources. Refer to Historical Resource Technical Report, prepared by Teresa Grimes, dated May 2023 for additional information.
Historic Resources and for the review of alterations to designated historic resources citywide. Downtown Design Review (DDR) for all substantial alterations, additions, and new construction
projects. For projects on or adjacent to properties identified individually as potential historic resources or contributing to a potential historic district, DDR review shall consider
the existing neighborhood character, building scale, building material, and potential impacts to historic resources.permit for demolition of structures on properties identified individually
as potential historic resources or contributing to a potential historic district. The required discretionary review shall ensure that no substantial adverse change occurs in the significance
of a historical resource.
ESMC Chapter 15-14 (Historic Preservation) establishes procedures for the designation of Chapter 7 of this Specific Plan (Administration) requires review and approval of a Discretionary
Chapter 7 of this Specific Plan (Administration) requires review and approval of a discretionary
The City values the historic resources and character of the Downtown area, and has policies and discretionary review requirements to ensure their preservation including: 1.2.3.The above
policies and discretionary review requirements ensure that no significant impacts occur to potential historic resources in the Downtown Specific Plan area.
105 W. Grand Avenue is prominently situated at the corner of Grand Avenue and Main Street and is an example of an existing mixed-use commercial building
218-220 Richmond Street is one of the few remaining examples of a mixed-use commercial building from the 1910s
CHAPTER 2 203 Richmond Street was the former location of the first El Segundo City Hall and Library PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-30
2-31
Mixed-Use buildings with commercial on the ground floor and residential units above
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
and visual and other conflicts between commercial and residential uses.air conditioning and exhaust fans shall be located away from residential uses. spaces and open space dedicated
to privatized common tenant use.shall provide ventilation systems to prevent odors from adversely affecting residential units.
All buildings shall be sited to reduce odor, noise, light and glare, Noise-generating equipment, such as refrigeration units and Residential development shall have dedicated entries
or lobby Commercial uses with residential units either above or attached
4.Mixed-Use Mixed-use projects combine commercial, office, and/or residential uses into one single development. The uses can be combined in multiple ways, such as each use located on
a separate floor or wing of a building or each use in separate buildings on the site. Both types of mixed-use development are encouraged.Mixed-use projects can create unique design
issues, such as the need to balance the requirements of residential uses with the needs of commercial uses. When designing mixed-use developments, it is important that commercial and
office uses are sensitive to the residential uses of the project. 1.2.3.4.
standards not included within this chapter.Unless stated otherwise, parking shall be based on net floor area defined in ESMC Section 15-1-6. In the case of mixed uses in a building
or on a site, the total requirements for parking facilities shall be the sum of the requirements for the various uses computed. be reduced by the payment of a parking in-lieu fee, per
ESMC Section 15-15-6D for the Main Street, Grand Avenue, and Richmond Street Districts. Tandem spaces shall have a maximum length of forty feet, provide for parking for two vehicles
maximum, and may only be utilized in residential development or where a Parking Demand Study is provided. All tandem parking spaces, where allowed, shall be clearly outlined on the
surface of the parking facility. Parking facilities in all Districts shall be designed in such a manner that any vehicle on the property will be able to maneuver as necessary so that
it may exit from the property traveling in a forward direction. However, cars may exit onto an alley traveling in a reverse direction. A vehicle shall not have to enter a street to
move from one location to any other location within the same facility. arranged so as to direct the light away from any residential dwelling unit.
Refer to ESMC Sections 15-15-1 through 15-15-5 for parking The number of parking spaces required by this chapter may Any lights provided to illuminate any parking area shall be
3.4.5.6.7.8.9.
– No additional
- Existing uses in an existing
–Additional parking per Table 2-10 is
Renovation (without expansion or use change) Expansion (without use change)
Existing Buildings (with permitted uses)
parking is required.required for the net new floor area.building with a maximum ten thousand square feet may change to any other use identified within the Table 2-10 without providing
additional on-site parking spaces, provided that all existing on-site parking spaces provided in connection with the building or structure shall be continued and available for use with
the subject building.
erected, enlarged or expanded unless parking facilities are provided and maintained as required by this Chapter and Table 2-10. Unless off-street parking reductions are permitted pursuant
to provisions herein, the number of off-street parking spaces required by Table 2-10 shall be considered the minimum necessary for each standalone use. When the calculation of the required
number of off-street parking spaces results in a fraction of a space, the number of spaces shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number.a.b.c.
Minimum Requirements - No use or building shall be established, Renovation, Expansion, Use Changes
CHAPTER 2 5.Parking The purpose of this section is to provide for adequate parking standards, to assure that parking spaces shall be suitably maintained and available for the use of
the occupants of the site and to mitigate potential associated on-street parking and traffic circulation problems throughout the Downtown and surrounding areas. General Provisions 1.2.PUBLIC
REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-32
2-33
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
PARKING REQUIREMENT
Refer to Commercial, Retail Sales1.5 spaces/1,000 sfRefer to Restaurant, Full Service0 spaces/1,000 sf4 spaces/1,000 sf1 space/unit1.5 spaces/1,000 sf for seating/serving area2 space/1,000
sf1.5 spaces/1,000 sf (under 10,000 gross sf) 2.5 spaces/1,000 sf (over 10,000 gross sf)1.5 spaces/1,000 sf1 space/1,000 sfStudio/1 Bedroom:
1 space/unit2 Bedrooms or more: 1.5 spaces/unit0.25 space/unit1 space/8 seats2 spaces/1,000 sf1 space/room1 space/1,000 sf plus Multiple-Family standards1 space/8 seats
LAND USES
Table 2-10: Parking Ratio Table
Alcohol Sales, Off-SiteAlcohol
Sales, On-Site without Food Service (Bars)Alcohol Sales, On-Site with Food ServiceArtistic or Cultural SevicesAssembly HallsBed and Breakfast InnBrewery and Alcohol Production (including
on-site consumption or restaurant) Commercial, Financial InstitutionsCommercial, Retail SalesCommercial, Retail ServicesDaycare CentersDwelling, Multiple-FamilyDwelling, Senior Citizen
HousingEntertainment (Live)Fitness CenterHotelLive/ WorkMovie Theater and Entertainment Facilities
(Continued on next page)
PARKING REQUIREMENT
0 space/1,000 sf2 spaces/1,000 sf (under 10,000 gross sf) 3 spaces/1,000 sf (over 10,000 gross sf)2 spaces/1,000 sf0 spaces for the portion
up to 500 sf 1 space/300 sf for the portion over 500 sf0 spaces for the portion up to 500 sf
1 space/300 sf for the portion over 500 sf0 spaces/1,000 sf2 spaces/1,000 sf1.5 spaces/1,000 sf1.5 spaces/1,000 sf1 space/1,000 sf0 spaces/1,000 sf1
space/8 seats
(Continued)
LAND USES
Table 2-10: Parking Ratio Table
MuseumOffices, GeneralOffice,
Medical-Dental Outdoor DiningParkletsPublic FacilitiesRecreational Facilities (Indoor Only)Restaurant, Food To Go Restaurant, Full ServiceStudio/Sound Stages and Support FacilitiesTemporary
Outdoor Retail Sales EventsTheater
CHAPTER 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-34
2-35
. Unless otherwise
The Director of Community Development
may modify the required number of parking spaces for fewer than ten spaces based on the submittal of a parking demand study. Reductions of ten or more spaces require Planning Commission
approval. Additionally, for any use for which the number of parking spaces is not listed, the Director of Community Development or Planning Commission will specify the required number
of spaces based on a parking demand study. A parking demand study must include, without limitation, information specifying the number of employees, customers, visitors, clients, residents
and owner-occupancy of residence and business (for existing legal non-conforming residential uses), shifts, deliveries, parking spaces, or other criteria established by the Director
of Community Development. The study may also include the use of valet or attendant parking. prohibited by this Specific Plan or the ESMC, parking spaces may be joint use or located
off-site on a different lot or lots, subject to approval of a parking demand study and a parking agreement. The agreement shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder, prior
to the issuance of a Building Permit. The agreement may include conditions as the Director of Community Development, or the Planning Commission, deems appropriate.
Parking Demand Study.Joint Use and Off-Site Parking Facilities
Parking Reductions 1.2.
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Sites with Transportation Systems Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plans The number of required parking spaces may be further modified subject to approval
of a Transportation Systems Management or Transportation Demand Management Plan, pursuant to the procedures and requirements of Chapters 15-16 and 15-17 of the El Segundo Municipal
Code. Failure to Maintain Required Parking In the event parking facilities required to be provided under this section or required pursuant to any application approved in accordance
with this section are not maintained, the Director of Community Development may revoke and cancel the certificate of occupancy issued for such structure. Prior to such revocation, the
Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing in accordance with the public hearing procedures provided in ESMC Chapter 15-28, Public Hearings. However, if it appears that failure
to maintain such required parking was reasonably beyond the control of the person required to maintain the same, the certificate of occupancy shall not be revoked until the owner has
had at least 90 days to reestablish the minimum required parking. In the event the certificate of occupancy is revoked, the premises covered thereby shall not be occupied or used for
any purpose until a new certificate of occupancy has been issued.
Parking structure facades should be articulated in similar character as surrounding uses.of active uses that screen podium parking, parking structures, and other uses that do not contribute
to a vibrant pedestrian environment.Structures located adjacent to Main Street, Richmond Street, or Grand Avenue shall minimize the visual impact by providing pedestrian activated uses
and urban design and landscaping features.Light fixtures within parking structures shall be designed to minimize off-site light spillover onto adjacent properties.To give the structure
proportions reflective of a regular building, the openings should resemble window openings rather than long, horizontal parking garage openings. The deck and railing pattern should
not dominate the elevations. Substantial massing should occur at the corner of the structures to anchor the building and give the structure proportions similar to a human occupied
building. These panels should incorporate relief to create shadow patterns and add visual interest.structure to accent entries and reduce the long horizontal façade that is typical
of parking structures. entrances to create a pedestrian scale. visual impact of the structure.Structures should to the extent feasible incorporate design elements that facilitate conversion
to other uses, including, but not limited to, higher floor to ceiling heights on ground levels, fast ramps, and flat parking plates/levels.
Parking structures should be visually appealing on all frontages. Where parking structures are planned, the street wall should be composed Height should be added to the parapet at
key areas on the building Consider adding awnings or trellis structures at vehicular and pedestrian Consider providing landscaping and vines on façades to help reduce the
1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.
CHAPTER 2Parking Structure Design Parking structures are usually larger buildings and as such can have a significant impact upon the streetscape. All proposed parking structures in
the Downtown should adhere to specific standards to ensure a pedestrian-oriented environment on Downtown streets. Parking structures should be articulated in similar character as surrounding
uses and visually appealing on all frontages PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-36
2-37
ALL
EYWA
Y or S
IDE ST
REET
T
S
D
N
O
M
H
C
I
eR
LOADING AREA INTERPRETATION 6-A
g
p
r
a
n
o
o
e
i
l
r
d
e
A
T
l
i
v
e
S
c
u
n
i
v
EN
B
r
I
e
S
A
r
M
o
,
g
n
E
i
d
V
a
A
o
L
D
N
A
R
shall not front onto Grand Avenue, Main Street, or Richmond Street
G
Loading/unloading, service areas, and trash and recycling enclosures
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
.
Service and Delivery
equal to or greater than fifty thousand square feet. enclosures shall not front onto Grand Avenue, Main Street, or Richmond Street (refer to Interpretation 6-A)access from the alley.
Loading spaces may encroach into any required alley setback.from any public street.feet wide. seven AM unless it can be demonstrated that such activities would not exceed the noise
limits of the ESMC.local service provider. Refuse collection areas shall be screened per ESMC Section 15-2-8 D. oriented to and accessed from the alley.
Loading areas are required for buildings with gross building areas Loading/unloading, service areas, and trash and recycling For lots adjoining an alley, loading areas shall adjoin
or have Loading docks and service bays shall be a minimum of twenty feet On-site loading areas shall be at least eighteen feet long and ten Loading or unloading of trucks is prohibited
between ten PM and Refuse collection service shall be contracted with an approved On lots adjoining an alley, refuse collection storage areas shall be
6.Service areas must be carefully designed in order to create an aesthetic street frontage in Downtown El Segundo.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.
Each property is allowed an area up to a maximum of one square foot per lineal If adjacent lots are aggregated into one, then a formula of one and one-half
foot of street frontage. square feet per lineal foot of street frontage is used to determine maximum allowable signage.
event of a conflict, the standards in this Specific Plan shall take precedence. combination of storefront, window and perpendicular/pedestrian signs. a.b.approved Master Sign Program
by the Director of Community Development or designee per ESMC Section 15-18-5. that the signs do not dominate the appearance. building façade. Signs that reflect the type of business
through design, shape, or graphic form are encouraged. overall sign design. Signs should not cover up important architectural features. Flush mounted signs should be positioned within
architectural features such as the window panel above the storefront or flanking the doorway.
All signs must comply with ESMC Chapter 15-18 and the following standards. In the Signage facing any public street within the Specific Plan area shall be limited to a Multi-tenant
developments of three or more commercial tenants require an Signs should be in scale with and in proportion to the primary building façade so Sign colors, materials, and design
should be compatible with that of the primary Painted wood and metal are appropriate materials for signs. The method of attaching the sign to the building should be integrated into
the Signs on canopies and awnings are encouraged.
General Signage Provisions 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.
CHAPTER 2 7.Signage Signs are significant features of shopping and entertainment districts as they serve as invitations for people to enter and patronize stores and restaurants. Unique,
attractive signs signify quality establishments and products. Unique and attractive signs enhance the charm and character of the Downtown PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-38
2-39
project over the public sidewalk
Window signs with painted script
accentuated with gooseneck lamps
Perpendicular/ pedestrian signs may
Storefront sign with freestanding lettering
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
. Temporary signs are limited to no more than fifteen percent of the window or
. Advertisements placed in windows are not allowed.
:
:
. Lettering, such as painted script is encouraged, while signs with backgrounds are
. Freestanding lettered/iconic signage (without background area) is encouraged and
. Signage shall be lighted from an external source, such as gooseneck lamps.
. One storefront sign is permitted per storefront.. One Perpendicular/Pedestrian sign is permitted per storefront.
. Window signage may be no more than sixteen square feet.
. Individual storefront signs may be no more than twenty square feet. . Perpendicular/Pedestrian signs may be no more than nine square feet on each sign face
Internally illuminated canister signs. Pole or pylon signs. Roof signs. Signs shall not project from the wall of the building or structure to which they are attached more Projecting
signs less than twelve feet above the grade are not allowed. Permitted projecting
than thirty inches and shall not exceed eight feet in height. signs may project over public sidewalks.
LetteringProhibited
allowed. Lighting storefront area for a maximum of thirty days per year. a.b.c.discouraged. (double sided signs are allowed). a.b.
SizeNumberLetteringTemporary SignsProhibited SizeSizeNumberProjection
Storefront Signs 1.2.3.4.5.6.Window Signs 1.2.3.Perpendicular/Pedestrian Signs 1.2.3.
A-frame sign example
. The name of the establishment must be
Changeable sign area must be screwed or
Exterior quality wood or metal (except as supplemented
. Fully painted and/or sealed; color must be in keeping with
by material for changeable messages, see below). Handbills and/or similar paper attachments shall not be affixed to approved A-Frame signsbolted to the sign. The sign must not contain
any glare producing surfaces or inappropriate lighting (blinking, fluorescent, neon lights, exposed power cords, etc). No more than one-half of each sign face may be reserved for changeable
messages, chalk board messages, or ‘wipe down’ board messages. the colors for the business establishment. In general, fluorescent or other strikingly bright or vivid colors will not
be approved unless part of a discernible theme other than simply to gain attention.clearly printed on each sign face in a color and style consistent with the establishment’s primary
signage.
Materials.Changeable Sign Area.FinishConstruction and Support
5.6.7.8.
. A-frame signs shall only be permitted on
:
. The sign face area shall not consist of text for more
. There shall be only one A-Frame sign per business.
Signage abutting an alley or private property shall not
In addition to allowed signage, a maximum of two square In addition, a directory wall sign identifying non-street Width 24”-34”Length 36”-48” (including frame, sign face, and any vertical
feet of lettered/logo and/or icon painted directly onto the entrance (without a background) is allowed.fronting businesses within a building is allowed on non-street fronting building
elevations (including elevations fronting on alleys). The directory sign may not exceed twelve square feet. supports)
Size.
exceed 0.6 square feet per lineal foot of alley frontage or interior property line length. All other standards shall apply. a.b.Size:a.b.Number than two-thirds of the area. The balance
of the sign face area should contain images, art, or graphics.the public sidewalk in front of the business. The sign must be positioned to allow a minimum of five feet clear sidewalk
area and not impede the main path of pedestrian travel. The sign must be placed within eighteen inches of the curb or adjacent to the corresponding outdoor dining area or business frontage.
All applicable ADA standards must be met.
Additional ElementsGraphicsLocation on Sidewalk
CHAPTER 2Non-Street Fronting Signs 1.2.A-Frame Signs 1.2.3.4.PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-40
d
n
e
2-41
ge
d
t
ea
s
g
r
n
i
e
i
d
r
r
a
a
e
Lb
e
g
d
e
n
y
o
a
d
w
e
d
r
i
a
u
o
r
q
e
e
r
h
t
t
o
o
n
. All barriers must be detectable t
sl
r
e
l
e
l
i
r
a
r
r
a
a
B
p
. All outdoor dining areas that extend more than
extending more than three feet into the right-of-way
e
d
g
n
d
e
e
t
Example of leading edge detectable barriers at an outdoor dining area
. Stanchions, end posts, and other corner supports must
a
g
ns
i
r
d
e
i
a
r
e
r
L
a
Maximum Distance from the Ground
b
measure thirty-six inches to fifty inches in maximum height. Planning Commission approval is required for any component greater than fifty inches in height from the sidewalk surface.to
visually impaired pedestrians who employ a cane for guidance; therefore, the bottom of barriers must be no greater than twenty-seven inches above the sidewalk surface. three feet into
the public right-of-way must have a detectable barrier at the leading edges to ensure that visually impaired pedestrians using canes can detect the dining area safely.
Leading Edge Barrier
d.Heighte.f.
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
. All barriers must be freestanding, without any (or
. Dining area barriers (fences, gates, ropes, planters,
. Fences or other perimeter barriers/enclosures with a
. Outdoor Dining Area (Area) shall be directly associated
:
Dining area may be covered or uncovered.
AppearanceFreestanding
height between thirty-six inches and fifty inches must be at least fifty percent open (see-through) in order to maintain visibility of street level activity. Any enclosure with a height
over fifty inches must be at least eighty percent open (see-through).etc.) must be both visually appealing and functional. All barrier material must be maintained in a good visual appearance,
without visible fading, dents, tears, rust, corrosion, or chipped or peeling paint.minimal) permanent or temporary attachments to buildings, sidewalks, and other infrastructure. Sectional
fencing (generally defined as rigid fence segments that can be placed together to create a unified fencing appearance) is an acceptable solution for outdoor seating areas using barriers.
Such fencing is portable, but cannot be easily shifted by patrons or pedestrians, as can less rigid forms of enclosures. Sectional fencing must be of metal (aluminum, steel, iron, or
similar) or of wood construction and must be of a dark color (either painted or stained). Vinyl and/or plastic material is prohibited.
Outdoor Dining
with an existing or proposed eating establishment.a.a.Visibilityb.c.
Dining AreaBarriers
8.Sidewalks, excess parking spaces, and other exterior paved areas may be used for the placement of tables, chairs, benches, planters, umbrellas, and related items to enliven the overall
pedestrian experience and support day and nighttime activity. Wide, pedestrian-friendly sidewalks should activate the Downtown by providing spaces for outdoor dining and informal gathering.
All new and substantially remodeled outdoor dining areas, as determined by the Director, are subject to design review and the standards in this section. Any existing outdoor dining
area that doesn’t conform with these standards will be considered legal nonconforming.1.2.
. All chairs used within an establishment’s
Furniture and fixtures must not be secured to
. Furniture and fixtures used in outdoor dining must
. Fabric inserts (natural or synthetic) are not
. Chairs may be colored or of a natural unpainted
. Furniture and fixtures must not contain signage for
. All moveable furniture and fixtures must be removed
. Chairs, like other outdoor dining elements, must
Consistency outdoor seating area should match each other by being of visually similar design, construction, and color. Colors material (e.g., all-weather metal, wood, wicker, etc.).
Chairs are not permitted to be white plastic. In general, fluorescent or other strikingly bright or vivid colors will not be approved unless part of a discernible theme other than simply
to gain attention.
All-Weather
StorageChairs
permitted to be used as part of a barrier. Chain link, cyclone fencing, chicken wire, or similar materials are not permitted to be used as part of a barrier.trees, lamp posts, street
signs, hydrants, or any other street infrastructure by means of ropes, chains, or any other such devices.be specifically made for outdoor use. and stored inside after business hours.the
restaurant or for any other entity in the form of wording, logos, drawings, pictorial or photographic representations, or any other likewise identifying characteristic.contribute to
the overall atmosphere of Downtown, and (if applicable) to any historic building or historic overlay district, and must be complementary in both appearance and quality.
Furniture and Fixtures:
j.Prohibiteda.Freestanding.b.c.d.Signagee.
3.
. Barrier rope or chains must have a diameter
. Planters are a friendlier and more attractive way to
. Barriers must not contain signage for the restaurant or
Rope or ChainsPlanters
of at least one inch to maintain detectability by the visually impaired. Plastic chains are discouraged. delineate an outdoor dining area and may be used in addition to, or in place
of, other barrier designs. Planters must not exceed a height of fifty inches above the level of the sidewalk. All planters must have live plants within them. Artificial plants, empty
planters, or planters with only bare dirt, mulch, straw, wood chips, or similar material are not permitted. Planters must be cleaned of all trash at least daily.any other entity.
g.h.i.Signage
CHAPTER 2 Outdoor chairs shall be all-weather, and each dining area should contain chairs that are similar to each other PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-42
2-43
overall atmosphere of the Downtown
Outdoor tables shall contribute to the
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Heaters and Fans are permitted provided that they do not impede
. The size and shape of tables strongly affects the functionality of
. Upholstered chairs are permitted as are upholstered cushions for
. All tables and chairs shall be of sturdy construction and made of
. Any furniture and fixtures other than tables, chairs, lighting, and
. Tables may be painted, anodized, colored or of a natural unpainted
. Tables need to be functional, not only for patrons, but also for pedestrians,
Upholstery chairs. In general, fluorescent or other strikingly bright or vivid colors will not be approved unless part of a discernible theme other than simply to gain attention. Outdoor
and water-resistant materials are required. Cushions must be attached in some manner to the chair itself.Colors material (e.g., all-weather wood, metal, wicker, etc.). Tables are not
permitted to be white plastic. In general, fluorescent or other strikingly bright or vivid colors will not be approved unless part of a discernible theme other than simply to gain attention.Size
and Shape an outdoor dining area. Due to many of the narrow sidewalks, restaurants should strive for space efficient seating layouts and furniture configuration. Square or rectangular
tables are strongly recommended as such tables may fit flush against a building’s wall and can permit more usable surface area for patrons while at the same time leaving more space
available for pedestrians.Durability quality materials.
Heaters and Fans.
Prohibited
given the limited space available for outdoor dining on many sidewalks. Outdoor dining furniture must also contribute to the overall atmosphere of Downtown and, if applicable, to any
historic property or district, and be complementary in both appearance and quality.pedestrian circulation within the outdoor dining area. Heaters and fans incorporated into approved
awnings projecting from the building are preferred.umbrellas are prohibited. This includes, but is not limited to: serving stations, bar counters, shelves, racks, sofas, televisions,
trash receptacles, and torches. Furniture that is lightweight and thus subject to being blown around during wind and sudden storm events is prohibited; as such, most plastic furniture
is unacceptable.
f.Tablesg.h.
. Market style umbrellas (those designed
. The size and shape of an umbrella strongly affects
. Umbrellas must be able to be removed each night
Umbrella fabric must be of a material suitable for
. Awnings are allowed subject to the same color and
. The lowest dimension of an extended umbrella must
. Umbrellas must blend appropriately with the surrounding
HeightSize and ShapeAwnings
ColorsMarket-Style Umbrellas
be at least seven feet above the sidewalk surface. In order to avoid causing an undue visual obstruction of other businesses, umbrellas must not exceed a height of ten feet above the
level of the sidewalk. These measurements must include not only the umbrella frame and panels, but also any decorative borders such as fringes, tassels, or other such ornamentation.built
environment. Umbrellas must be of one solid color. In general, fluorescent or other strikingly bright or vivid colors will not be approved unless part of a discernible theme other
than simply to gain attention. Signage and wording are not permitted. its functionality within a constrained space such as an outdoor dining area. Due to the narrow measurements of
most restaurants’ outdoor dining areas, restaurants using umbrellas should strive for space-efficient umbrella designs.specifically for patio or outdoor dining use, and which vent breezes)
are preferred.outdoor use, and must be canvas-type. No plastic fabrics, plastic/vinyl-laminated fabrics, or any type of rigid materials are permitted for use as umbrellas within an
outdoor dining area. or during strong storms and stored inside, for the safety of pedestrians and surrounding business.material requirements as umbrellas.
b.c.d.e.f.Material.g.Removableh.
. To ensure effective
. Umbrellas can add a welcoming
Contained within the Outdoor Seating Area
pedestrian flow, all parts of any umbrella (including the fabric and supporting ribs) must be contained entirely within the outdoor seating area.
feel to outdoor dining areas, and provide shelter from the elements; making their use desirable for outdoor dining applications. Appropriately designed and sized umbrellas are permitted.
Pop-up tents and freestanding canopies are not permitted. All umbrellas must comply with the following conditions:a.
Shade Structures and Umbrellas
CHAPTER 2 Umbrella colors shall blend with the surrounding built environment 4.PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
2-44
2-45
create a sense of vibrancy in the Downtown
. The outdoor dining area must meet the minimum
. Area shall be designed and operated so that it is
Outdoor lighting is recommended to enhance the pedestrian atmosphere and
Fire Safety
applicable requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the California Building Code (CBC). in compliance with regulations regarding access to building openings,
fire lanes, use of combustible materials and other fire safety measures as identified in the ESMC and other applicable law.
Accessibility
6.7.
PRIVATE REALM - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
. Lighting should be of
. Lighting must not contain signage for the
. The light must not contain any glare producing
. Lighting must be kept in proper working order at all
Lighting used within an outdoor dining area must be
. Lighting must be hardwired in an electrical conduit.
. All lighting used within an outdoor dining area should match
. Lighting must not be secure to trees, lamp posts, street
The lowest dimension of lighting must be at least seven feet
:
Color Temperature and Brightness of Lighting
MatchingHeight.MaintenanceSignage or Wording
specifically made for outdoor use, and must have a hardwired electrical connection.each other by being of visually similar design, construction, and color.above the sidewalk surface.
In order to avoid causing an undue visual obstruction of other businesses, lighting must not exceed a height of ten feet. a color temperature between 2,500 Kelvin and 3,000 Kelvin;
2,700 Kelvin is ideal. All lighting must be dimmable, and must not exceed the brightness of public street lighting as determined by the Director. times. Burnt out lighting must be replaced
promptly (within one working day).surfaces or inappropriate lighting (blinking, fluorescent, neon lights, etc).signs, hydrants, or any other street infrastructure by means of ropes,
chains, or any other such devices.restaurant or for any other entity in the form of wording, logos, drawings, pictorial or photographic representations, or any other likewise identifying
characteristic.Power cords and similar methods of power are not allowed.
Lighting Source
Power Cords
Lighting
a.All-Weather.b.c.d.e.f.g.Supporth.i.
5.
. Six foot minimum clear passage area is
:
. The floor of outdoor seating areas must be
. Restaurants need to be mindful of adjoining
No sidewalk less than eight feet in width may be allowed to have outdoor dining.
Clear Passage Area
required for pedestrian access between outdoor dining area and the curb where the sidewalk is at least eight feet. A wider clear passage area may be required for any of the previous
conditions at the discretion of the Director of Community Development or his/her designee.
Pedestrian Access
a.businesses when using outdoor dining areas, making sure that neighboring businesses remain visible to pedestrians and motorists. If tall elements are used as part of the design, an
applicant may be required to adjust the outdoor dining area’s layout and/or distance from the adjoining property line (twenty-four inches or more) to ensure that this visibility is
maintained.Dining Area Floor uncovered sidewalk as to provide continuity with the adjacent public right-of-way (does not apply to approved parklet configurations).
Business Setback
8.9.10.Parklets Parklets are outdoor dining and gathering areas which are located adjacent to the public sidewalk and typically placed within an existing parking space adjacent to the
roadway curb. Parklets are encouraged within the Downtown Specific Plan Area, but subject to a future Parklet’s Program. Refer to Chapter 6 for additional information regarding the
Parklet Program implementation.
CHAPTER 2 Wide, pedestrian-friendly sidewalks activate the Downtown by providing usable spaces for outdoor dining and informal pedestrian gathering areas PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember
2023
2-46
3-1
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Improve walkability and the pedestrian environment and encourage bicycle use with additional
– Develop a comprehensive parking plan with increased parking wayfinding signage and facilitate
Support enhanced and efficient mobility opportunities for walking, driving, bicycling, and transit.
Expanded Mobility – Pedestrians and Bicycles – bicycle improvements and amenities. Improved Public Parking innovative methods for parking such as shared parking agreements.
Planning Principles Related to Multimodal Mobility: •••••
CHAPTER 3: PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITYA.Introduction This section of the Specific Plan Update discusses the opportunities for improvement of mobility that reflect the needs and
goals of the Downtown El Segundo community. The Multimodal Mobility chapter includes improvement opportunities related to the pedestrian network, bicycle circulation, public transit,
vehicular circulation, and parking. This section supports the Specific Plan Update objectives related to the improvement of walkability and the pedestrian environment, encouragement
of bicycle use, support of enhanced and efficient mobility opportunities for walking, driving, bicycling, and transit, and the development of a comprehensive parking plan. They are
also designed to reinforce the Planning Principles established within Chapter 1 of this document.The opportunities presented within this Multimodal Mobility section can enhance the
comfortability of walking, biking, and taking transit, to create a Downtown El Segundo in which community and atmosphere is emphasized in addition to vehicular mobility. This section
also includes improvement opportunities for the Downtown corridors of Main Street, Grand Avenue, and Richmond Street that could enhance multimodal mobility. It is not the intent of
this chapter to provide specific street geometric design standards rather, it is to suggest design-oriented treatments of the street environment. Refer to streetscape amenities and
beautification recommendations in Chapter 4 for additional information and requirements.
Pedestrian Network
B.Opportunities for the improvement of the pedestrian network in this section focus on improving access and comfortability on both sidewalks and at roadway crossings. During the public
engagement period for the Specific Plan Update, respondents showed strong support for walkability improvements within Downtown, with almost two-thirds of survey respondents listing
enhanced walkability among their top three priorities. Additionally, walking is an important mode of access for Downtown El Segundo, as almost ninety percent of survey respondents
listed walking as one of their typical mode of travel choice for getting to Downtown.The Smoky Hollow Specific Plan has identified improvements along Franklin Avenue which include artistic
crosswalks and potential future “woonerf” which are envisioned to transform the street into a pedestrian and bike-friendly connection between Smoky Hollow and the Downtown. See additional
standards and requirements for Franklin Avenue within the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan.
GRAND AVE
MAIN ST
Pedestrian Circulation Map
Recommended Pedestrian Enhancements
CHAPTER 3 Walking is an important mode of access within a vibrant Downtown
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
Figure 3.1
3-2
3-3
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
resistant.kept clear of any fixtures and/or obstructions. A minimum of four feet shall be reserved to allow for two people to walk comfortably side by side and in accordance with the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.Potted plants, raised planters, streetscape elements and/or landscaped parkways should be used to define the sidewalk edge and provide
a buffer between pedestrians and moving vehicles where feasible.recommendations established in Chapter 4 of this document.exits to increase the visibility of approaching pedestrians.obstructions,
such as trees, to increase accessibility, especially for those using wheeled devices.compliant curb ramps to improve accessibility for those using mobility devices.
Sidewalk surface should be stable, firm, smooth, and slip Sidewalks shall have a “through pedestrian zone” that is Integrate streetscape amenities and beautification Add mirrors
to parking structure, driveway, and alleyway Remove sidewalk obstructions or re-route around Upgrade curb cuts at driveways and alleyways to ADA-
The following general improvements should be implemented to provide a more comfortable pedestrian experience in Downtown El Segundo (see Figure 3.1, Pedestrian Circulation Map):1.2.3.4.5.6.7.
Sidewalks and Pedestrian Streetscape
1.The pedestrian experience plays a very important part in the functionality and the economic health of the Downtown environment and sidewalks are a key component of the Downtown pedestrian
circulation network. Sidewalks provide pedestrian access to virtually every activity and provide critical connections between other modes of travel, including the automobile, public
transit, and bicycles. Wide sidewalks, street trees and landscaping, and consistent street furnishings all contribute to a desirable pedestrian street scene. Sidewalks must be wide
enough to be comfortable, with smooth paving and special accent paving in select locations, and buffering provided from vehicular traffic. Crosswalk design, traffic control devices,
and visual markers all are important in encouraging pedestrian use.Currently, pedestrian facilities are provided throughout Downtown, including sidewalks on all streets. While sidewalks
exist throughout Downtown, some existing mobility challenges were observed. In some locations, the sidewalk is obstructed or damaged by trees, which can affect the pedestrian experience.
While sidewalk amenities, such as benches, promote visitor comfortability, they also result in narrowed walkways in some areas. Vehicular ingress and egress throughout Downtown present
comfortability challenges to pedestrians as well. Many driveways have limited visibility to the sidewalk in advance of the exit, which could make it difficult for drivers exiting the
structure to see pedestrians. Additionally, in most locations where the sidewalk is interrupted by a driveway, the curb cuts do not feature ADA-compliant curb ramps, resulting in degraded
comfortability and access for those using mobility devices.
Pedestrian Crossings
pedestrians and encourage signal compliance.crossing pedestrians.striping to increase their visibility. At a minimum, the crosswalk edge-lines shall be striped to meet California Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD) standards.to meet ADA compliance by adding truncated domes, modifying pedestrian push button locations relative to the ramp, and providing
audible push buttons.
Install pedestrian signals to better alert drivers to crossing Install raised crosswalks for better visibility and awareness of Crosswalks should provide decorative paving or continental-style
To better serve users with mobility challenges, upgrade ramps
2.Pedestrian crossings are currently provided throughout Downtown, at both intersections and at some midblock locations. There are four midblock crosswalks, all located on Main Street,
which feature pedestrian-activated in-road flashing lights, crosswalk signs, and yield paddles. These midblock crossings lack crosswalk lines, which reduces their visibility to drivers.While
some intersection pedestrian crossings in Downtown El Segundo feature ADA-compliant curb ramps with truncated domes, most lack these accessibility enhancements. Additionally, most crosswalks
lack edge lines and striping. Both signalized intersections in Downtown do not provide pedestrian countdown on the signal heads.Midblock Crosswalks The following walkability enhancements
should be considered at the four existing midblock crosswalks along Main Street (see Figure 3.2, Pedestrian Crossing Map):1.2.3.4.
GRAND
MAIN ST
Pedestrian Crossing Map
Recommended Controlled Intersection EnhancementsRecommended Midblock CrosswalkEnhancements
CHAPTER 3 Midblock crosswalk on Main Street between Holly Avenue and Pine Avenue
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
Figure 3.2
3-4
3-5
Paseo Map
Pedestrian
GRAND
Handprint Alley is an existing Downtown
Figure 3.3
to make a narrow space more appealing
MAIN ST
pedestrian paseo which integrates public art
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Recommended Pedestrian PaseoEnhancements
domes and modifying pedestrian push buttons.striping to increase their visibility. At a minimum, the crosswalk edge-lines shall be striped to meet California Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Device (MUTCD) standards.meet current standards and inform pedestrians of the remaining walk time available.Ensure that pedestrian signals comply with current MUTCD pedestrian
clearance time standards, with a standard walking speed of 3.5 feet per second.
Upgrade curb ramps to meet ADA compliance by adding truncated Crosswalks should provide decorative paving or continental-style At signalized intersections, install pedestrian countdown
heads to
Controlled Intersection Crosswalks The following walkability enhancements should be considered at controlled intersections (see Figure 3.2, Pedestrian Crossing Map):1.2.3.4.3. Pedestrian
Paseos Paseos are pedestrian-only pathways that provide opportunities to create unique public spaces. Paseos provide internal connections between the roadways and alleyways and allow
for pedestrian-friendly activities to occur. Paseos provide linkages between public parking areas and the alleyway and street environment and connections between residential and commercial
areas.The Specific Plan area has existing paseos at Handprint Alley, located between Main Street and Marketplace Alley, and Butterfly Lane Alley, located between Main Street and the
alleyway west of Standard Street. These paseos should be enhanced with paseo improvements listed below where feasible, and accentuated with wayfinding signage, accent lighting, and
decorative paving at the entry on Main Street to provide increased visibility.
the public right-of-way. Consider the consistent use of vertical elements within the streetscape as wayfinding devices at paseo entries such as arched entry elements, trellises, banners
and hanging plants on light poles, and/or large potted plants.direct and orient pedestrians to key areas in the Downtown.landscaping, special paving treatment, and public art and be
well lit utilizing pedestrian scale decorative lighting to create safe and usable spaces that are visually appealing at all hours.access as required.
The pedestrian entry to paseos should be highly visible from An intensive wayfinding program should be used in paseos to Paseos should include pedestrian amenities such as seating,
Paseos shall be ADA accessible and accommodate emergency
The following enhancements should be considered at paseos (see Figure 3.3, Pedestrian Paseo Map):1.2.3.4.
CHAPTER 3 Additional paseos are recommended throughout the Specific Plan area to further enhance pedestrian access, promote walkability, and increase opportunities for community gathering.
Paseos are suggested at existing parking lots, such as between Main Street and Richmond Street, to provide opportunities for pedestrian linkages to the roadways, alleyways, and existing
public parking. Paseo improvements should also be utilized at the existing public walkways located between primary roadways and alleyways, such as the walkway west of the existing
public parking structure at Grand Avenue and Richmond Street, to activate the use of these pedestrian linkages. Paseos provide off-street linkages and allow for unique pedestrian spaces
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
3-6
3-7
Bicycle Circulation Map
GRAND
Figure 3.4
MAIN ST
A Class III bicycle route with “sharrow” lane marking
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Recommended Bicycle RouteEnhancements
Bicycle Circulation
C.Opportunities for the improvement of the bicycle network in this section focus on comfortability, connection to existing Citywide bicycle facilities, and convenience. During the public
engagement period for the Specific Plan Update, almost half of survey respondents listed biking as one of their typical modes of travel for visiting Downtown El Segundo, suggesting
the importance of enhanced bicycle mobility in Downtown’s transportation future. Bicycle Lanes Currently, bicycle facilities in Downtown El Segundo consist of Class III bicycle routes
with on-pavement shared lane markings, also known as “sharrows”, on Main Street and Grand Avenue. West of Downtown, Class II bike lanes currently exist along Grand Avenue, between Loma
Vista Street and Vista Del Mar, providing bicycle access to El Segundo Beach. The Specific Plan Update envisions the enhancement of east-west bicycle facilities through Downtown to
connect to these Class II bike lanes, providing improved bicycle mobility between Downtown and other points of interest in the City, such as El Segundo Beach (see Figure 3.4, Bicycle
Circulation Map, and Section E, Vehicular Circulation, for additional information).The Class III bicycle route along Main Street connects El Segundo Boulevard in the south to Imperial
Avenue in the north, providing direct access to City Hall, within Downtown El Segundo, and Library Park and El Segundo High School, north of the Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan
Update envisions improved bicycle comfortability along this corridor, without compromising direct access to these points of interest.
Bicycle Accommodation and Wayfinding The bicycle facilities in Downtown El Segundo are supported by route signage, wayfinding signage for area destinations, and decorative bicycle racks
with a Downtown El Segundo themed-design. While existing bicycle racks provide short-term parking and add an element of placemaking, a bicycle hub, consisting of a gated area with controlled
access, could be installed in the parking structure for more secure and longer-term parking. The bicycle hub could also feature a repair station, with basic tools such as wrenches and
pumps, to support the convenience of bicycle travel to and from Downtown. Enhanced bicycle wayfinding signage, such as maps which show area bicycle routes and destinations, could be
installed at Downtown gateway points and at the intersection of the two existing bike routes, at Main Street and Grand Avenue. This upgraded wayfinding can support bicycle navigation
and comfortability throughout the Downtown. Refer to Chapter 4, Section B, Gateway and Wayfinding Signage for additional information.
CHAPTER 3
Existing bicycle wayfinding sign on Grand Avenue
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
3-8
3-9
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Line 109 connects LAX and Torrance via El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, and Redondo Beach. In
– Lunchtime Shuttle services were suspended during the COVID-19 pandemic and had not resumed as of Winter 2023.
– Following suspended service during the COVID-19 pandemic, the City partnered with Swoop, Inc. to resume Beach Shuttle
– The City currently operates Dial-a-Ride (DAR) service in partnership with Lyft. DAR primarily focuses on enhancing accessibility
Public Transit
Beach Cities Transit Line 109 –Lunchtime ShuttleBeach Shuttle Dial-a-Ride
Downtown El Segundo, this line runs along Main Street and Grand Avenue. This line has headways of 40-50 minutes during weekdays. Previously, the City of El Segundo Transportation Lunchtime
Shuttle operated on a continuous loop between Downtown El Segundo and the Smoky Hollow area to the east from 11:45 to 2pm on weekdays. service for the 2022 summer season. The Beach
Shuttle operates between El Segundo and El Porto Beach during the El Segundo Unified School District summer break. There are several stops located near Downtown. for seniors and disabled
residents. The service operates on weekdays and serves the entirety of Downtown.
D.Opportunities for the improvement of public transit in this section focus on efficiency of transit service and comfortability of transit stop amenities. During the public engagement
for the Specific Plan Update, less than one percent of survey respondents listed public transit as one of their typical modes for visiting Downtown El Segundo. Envisioning a more efficient
and comfortable transit environment in Downtown could help to increase ridership and improve access for those who rely on or choose to utilize public transit.Transit Stakeholders Discussion
In May 2022, a virtual transit stakeholders meeting was held, in which representatives from transportation service providers in and around Downtown El Segundo shared their goals and
discussed opportunities to be incorporated into the Specific Plan Update. Topics discussed included service-related items, such as coordination between the City and Beach Cities Transit
about Main Street closure detours, as well as transit stop attributes such as shelters and bus zone lengths. Transit Service Downtown El Segundo is served by Beach Cities Transit and
City of El Segundo Transportation. During temporary closures of Main Street between Holly Avenue and Grand Avenue, the bus lines operating on the corridor are re-routed. Below is a
list of the bus routes that provide service to and around Downtown:••••
resume operation of the Lunch Time Shuttle or similar service. Upon resumption, expand service hours to include early mornings and evenings to provide a First-and-Last-Mile commuting
solution and enhance the dinnertime connections between Downtown El Segundo, Smoky Hollow, and the east part of the City.and the El Segundo Police Department to enhance public outreach
regarding temporary closures of Main Street and subsequent transit service detours.buses and the City’s other transit services as well as ensure adequate service to the north portion
of Main Street, near Pine and Mariposa AvenuesTransit shelters could be designed to reflect City or Downtown community aesthetic desires.thirty-five feet where feasible.
Investigate public-private partnership opportunities and/or otherwise Continue communication between City Hall, Beach Cities Transit, Conduct a public/mass transit study to increase
ridership on BCT Provide transit shelters at Downtown bus stops, where space allows. At a minimum, include a bench and waste bin at each bus stop.Increase bus zone length by extending
red curb at stops, to at least
4.5.6.Transit Infrastructure Currently, the facilities featured at bus stops within Downtown vary by stop. Some include a bench and waste bin, while others provide no accommodations.
There are two existing bus stops featuring shelters, one on Main Street within the temporary closure area, and one on Grand Avenue between Standard Street and Eucalyptus Drive. The
following bus stop enhancements should be considered to improve transit mobility and rider comfortability in Downtown El Segundo: 1.2.3.
GRAND AVE
MAIN ST
Transit Stop Map
Recommended Transit StopEnhancements
transportation plan development to ensure that Line 109 continues to serve Downtown El Segundo and identify opportunities to increase service frequency or hours of service.private partnerships.expand
ed service hours, including evenings and weekends.
Coordinate with Beach Cities Transit on their ongoing short-range Continue operating the Beach Shuttle each summer through public-Continue operating DAR through public-private partnerships
with
CHAPTER 3 The following improvements to transit service should be considered to enhance mobility to, from, and within Downtown El Segundo (see Figure 3.5, Transit Stop Map, and Chapter
4, Section C.c, Bus Shelters and Transit Stops, for additional information):1.2.3.
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
Figure 3.5
3-10
3-11
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Vehicular Circulation
The Smoky Hollow Specific Plan has identified potential one-way traffic improvements along portions of Standard Street and Eucalyptus
Main Street and Mariposa AvenueMain Street and Grand AvenueMain Street and El Segundo Boulevard
E.Opportunities for the improvement of vehicular circulation in this section focus on multi-modal operations at intersections and placemaking considerations along roadway segments. During
the public engagement period for the Specific Plan Update, just over two-thirds of survey respondents listed driving as one of their typical modes for visiting Downtown El Segundo,
suggesting vehicular access to be an important value for the Downtown community. During the development of the Specific Plan Update, a level of service (LOS) study was conducted to
evaluate the state of vehicular circulation within Downtown. Current LOS was studied at the following three intersections, all of which were determined to operate acceptably:•••While
it is important to recognize how people get to Downtown, it is equally important to understand why they come and what they expect once they get there. The livability and attraction
of a successful Downtown is connected to the design of its streets. Large and walkable sidewalks, reduced travel lanes that are easy to cross, slower traffic, and amenities such as
places to sit, pedestrian lighting, signage, and special paving all influence the user’s experience. The following section discusses the current, preferred, and alternate roadway configurations
for Main Street, Grand Avenue, and Richmond Street. Main Street and Grand Avenue are the primary corridors for vehicular circulation within Downtown, and Richmond Street is notable
for its change in vehicular access during the COVID-19 pandemic. This section proposes re-configuration opportunities on Main Street, Grand Avenue, and Richmond Street, which improve
pedestrian mobility throughout Downtown and serve Specific Plan objectives.Note:Drive to increase on-street parking. See additional standards and requirements for Franklin Avenue within
the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan.
Main Street Existing Road Section
Figure 3.6
CHAPTER 3 1. Main Street Main Street is the primary north-south corridor in Downtown El Segundo. Main Street is a four-lane collector north of Grand Avenue and a four-lane secondary
arterial south of Grand Avenue, as designated in the El Segundo General Plan Circulation Element. Within Downtown, Main Street provides parallel on-street parking and the speed limit
on Main Street is twenty-five miles per hour (mph). Some stop-controlled intersections on Main Street are enhanced with light-emitting diode (LED) flashing stop signs, such as the intersection
with Franklin Avenue. The typical existing roadway cross-section of Main Street in the Downtown is eighty feet, with four ten foot travel lanes (two in each direction) with bike “sharrows”,
twelve foot wide sidewalks, and two eight foot parking lanes (see Figure 3.6, Main Street Existing Road Section).The segment of Main Street from Grand Avenue to El Segundo Boulevard
is designated as a Truck Route in the General Plan Circulation Element and is marked by signage. This segment is also a designated Class III bicycle route, marked with “sharrows”. The
Preferred Roadway Concept for Main Street proposes a reduction in the number of travel lanes on Main Street from two lanes in each direction to one lane in each direction, which, depending
on the purpose and use of this Truck Route, could increase the potential for truck-bicycle interactions. A future truck route study is recommended to further investigate the purpose
and use of the existing truck route. Refer to the Implementation Action Plan in Chapter 6 for additional information.
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
3-12
3-13
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Main Street Preferred Road Section
Figure 3.7
Preferred Concept The proposed Pedestrian Mobility Emphasis concept for Main Street envisions enhanced pedestrian comfort and outdoor gathering opportunities, with wider sidewalks and
outdoor dining, and new Class II bike lanes (see Figure 3.7, Main Street Preferred Road Section). The designated bike lanes provide greater horizontal separation between cyclists and
vehicular traffic than the existing Class III “sharrow” bike routes and the reduced and narrowed travel lanes allow for widened sidewalks with expanded pedestrian uses and outdoor dining
opportunities. The Pedestrian Mobility Emphasis concept maintains the existing parallel parking spaces on both sides of the street and is expected to maintain a similar parking supply
along Main Street as exists today. Main Street is anticipated to host occasional or periodic street closures for community events including the weekly Farmers Market which may be partial
closures of any street blocks between El Segundo Boulevard and Mariposa Avenue. Additionally, a future traffic study is recommended to analyze the potential long-term closure of Main
Street to vehicles. Refer to Chapter 6 for additional information.
Main Street Alternative Road Section
Figure 3.8
CHAPTER 3Alternative Concept The Bicycle Mobility Emphasis alternative concept for Main Street envisions enhanced cyclist comfort with Class II buffered bike lanes (see Figure 3.8, Main
Street Alternative Road Section). Buffered bike lanes provide greater horizontal separation between cyclists and vehicular traffic than the existing Class III “sharrow” bike routes
and can be enhanced with conflict-zone striping for increased visibility. The Bicycle Mobility Emphasis concept is expected to maintain a similar parking supply along Main Street as
exists today, since parallel parking is maintained on both sides of the street.
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
3-14
3-15
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Grand Avenue Existing Road Section
Figure 3.9
Grand Avenue
2.Grand Avenue is a four lane east-west secondary arterial in Downtown El Segundo, with a raised center median. Grand Avenue provides parallel parking for the entire extent of Downtown
on both sides of the street and includes median parking between Main Street and Concord Street. Grand Avenue is a dedicated bicycle route and truck route, and the speed limit is twenty-five
mph. The typical roadway cross section of Grand Avenue between Main Street and Concord Street is one hundred feet, with four eleven foot travel lanes (two travel lanes in each direction)
with bike “sharrows”, ten foot wide sidewalks, four eight foot parking lanes (including two along the median), and a four foot median (see Figure 3.9 Grand Avenue Existing Road Section).
The cross section east of Main Street is similar, but it features a wider median that tapers off toward Eucalyptus Street.
Grand Avenue Preferred Road Section
Figure 3.10
CHAPTER 3Preferred Concept The preferred Grand Avenue Pedestrian Mobility Emphasis concept envisions enhanced pedestrian comfort and outdoor gathering opportunities, with wider sidewalks
and outdoor dining, while maintaining the existing Class III bike route “sharrows” (see Figure 3.10, Grand Avenue Preferred Road Section). This concept involves the conversion of parallel
parking spaces on both sides of the street and along both sides of the median to angled parking to allow for wider sidewalks and outdoor dining and includes a widened central median.
Though angled parking allows a higher parking space capacity over the same distance as compared to parallel parking, the removal of the median parking spaces would result in a net loss
in current parking spaces along the corridor. Depending on final design, the net loss of parking on Grand Avenue under this concept could range from about ten percent to about twenty
percent.
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
3-16
3-17
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Grand Avenue Class II Alternative Road Section
Figure 3.11
: The Class II concept envisions enhanced cyclist comfort with buffered bike lanes (see Figure 3.11, Grand
Class II Bike Lane Alternative
Avenue Class II Alternative Road Section). Buffered bike lanes provide greater horizontal separation between cyclists and vehicular traffic than the existing Class III “sharrow” bike
routes and can be enhanced with conflict-zone striping for increased visibility. As Class II bike lanes currently exist on Grand Avenue west of Downtown, these concepts would further
connect El Segundo’s citywide bike lane network and increase mobility to, from, and through Downtown. The Bicycle Mobility Emphasis would provide about half the number of parking spaces
as currently exists along Grand Avenue, as median parking would be removed, and curb lane parallel parking would be maintained.
Alternative Concepts There are two Bicycle Mobility Emphasis alternatives developed for Grand Avenue that provide enhanced cyclist comfort through the creation of dedicated bicycle
facilities: Class II bike lanes and Class IV protected bikeway (Cycle-Track) which are illustrated in Figures 3.11 and 3.12.•
Grand Avenue Cycle-Track Alternative Road Section
Figure 3.12
: The Cycle-Track concept includes a two-way Class IV protected bikeway on one side of the street (see Figure 3.12,
Cycle-Track Alternative
Grand Avenue Cycle-Track Alternative Road Section). Class IV protected bikeways feature both horizontal and vertical (a lane of parked vehicles) separation between cyclists and vehicular
traffic. The Buffered Bike Lanes concept provides greater horizontal separation between vehicle travel lanes and cyclists than the current Class III “sharrows” bike route, but not
does provide protected facilities. However, vehicles wishing to ingress and egress the on-street parking must pass through the bike lanes and yield to cyclists, creating more potential
conflicts than the Cycle-Track concept. The Cycle-Track concept would provide similar parking supply along the corridor to that of the Pedestrian Mobility Emphasis concept, with about
a ten percent to twenty percent reduction in spaces.
CHAPTER 3•
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
3-18
3-19
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Richmond Street Existing Road Section
Figure 3.13
Richmond Street
3.Richmond Street is a two lane north-south local street in Downtown El Segundo. Richmond Street provides on-street parking for the entire length of Downtown, and includes angled parking
on the west side of the street between El Segundo Boulevard and the midblock crossing north of Grand Avenue. The speed limit on Richmond Street is twenty-five mph. Beginning during
the COVID-19 pandemic, the half-block of Richmond Street south of Grand Avenue was temporarily closed to vehicular traffic to provide expanded outdoor dining opportunities. Additional
options for flexible use of space for continued pedestrian comfort, outdoor dining, and events on Richmond Street are also discussed in Section E.5, Street Closure Placemaking. The
typical roadway cross section of Richmond Street between Franklin Avenue and Grand Avenue is sixty feet and it consists of two eleven foot travel lanes (one in each direction), an eight
foot wide sidewalk on the west side of the street, ten foot wide sidewalk on the east side, thirteen foot angled parking lane on the west side, and a seven foot parallel parking lane
on the east side (see Figure 3.13, Richmond Street Existing Road Section).
Richmond Street Preferred Road Section
Figure 3.14
CHAPTER 3Preferred Concept The preferred Richmond Street Sidewalk Dining concept for the area between Franklin Avenue and Grand Avenue envisions enhanced pedestrian comfort and expanded
outdoor gathering opportunities with wider sidewalks and outdoor dining and the continuation of two travel lanes (see Figure 3.14, Richmond Street Preferred Road Section). This concept
would result in the removal of all parking spaces on this portion of the street and assumes a future parking structure would be developed adjacent to Richmond Street. The Sidewalk Dining
concept for Richmond Street would provide similar vehicular capacity to the existing road section.
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
3-20
3-21
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Richmond Street Alternative Road Section
Figure 3.15
Alternative Concept The Pedestrian Mall concept between Franklin Avenue and Grand Avenue envisions enhanced pedestrian comfort and expanded outdoor gathering opportunities with wider
sidewalks and the removal of vehicular travel lanes to allow for an expanded permanent outdoor dining area with increased gathering opportunities (see Figure 3.15, Richmond Street Alternative
Road Section). The Pedestrian Mall concept would result in the removal of all parking spaces on this portion of the street and assumes a future parking structure would be developed
adjacent to Richmond Street. The Pedestrian Mall concept for Richmond Street would permanently restrict vehicular traffic in this portion of the street, except for emergency vehicle
access. Refer to Section E.5, Street Closure Placemaking, for additional information.
Street Closure Placemaking
5.Street closures used for temporary or permanent public space add an opportunity for community gathering and establish a sense of community and provide locations for outdoor activities.
These opportunities exist within many Downtown streets, but are currently implemented on portions of Main Street and Richmond Street. Main Street Main Street has in-road bollards that
allow for temporary street closures for special events, such as the Farmer’s Market. To continue serving Specific Plan Update objectives, including promoting a “village” character and
a pedestrian friendly environment, this flexibility for temporary street closures should be maintained. Decorative paving is suggested in the travel lanes in this portion of Main Street
to signify this special place. To enhance mobility throughout Downtown during closure events on Main Street, coordination and public outreach should be implemented as described in
Section D, Public Transit.
Existing retractable in-road bollards on Main Street being used during Farmer’s Market
Intersection Control
the intersection of Main Street and Grand Avenue to reduce left turn conflicts with oncoming vehicles and pedestrians in the adjacent crosswalk.signs and stop bars on the controlled
approaches to reduce right-of-way confusion.
All-way stop control, in which vehicles on all approaches must Side-street stop control, in which vehicles on side-street
stop.approaches must stop, while vehicles on major road approaches do not. Protected left turn phases could be added in all directions at All side-street stop-control intersections
should include stop
CHAPTER 3 4.There are two signalized intersections in Downtown, at Main Street and Mariposa Avenue and at Main Street and Grand Avenue. All other intersections include one of the following
control types:••Downtown includes an extensive alleyway network, which provides access to off-street parking, business access, and truck circulation. Most intersections between alleyways
and roadways are side-street stop-controlled, though many lack advance stop bars on the alley approach, which can increase right-of-way confusion and cause conflicts with cross-traffic
pedestrians, bicyclists, or vehicles. The following improvements should be considered to increase the multi-modal mobility of intersection control in Downtown:1.2.
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
3-22
3-23
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Outdoor dining along Richmond Street during the temporary road closure
Richmond Street Beginning during the COVID-19 pandemic, the half-block of Richmond Street between Grand Avenue and Franklin Avenue was temporarily closed to vehicular traffic to provide
expanded outdoor dining opportunities. This temporarily-closed area features dining tables and heat lamps to serve patrons of restaurants on the block. During the public engagement
period for the Specific Plan Update, one hundred and thirty stakeholders responded to the questions of “do you feel that Richmond Street between Grand Avenue and Franklin Avenue should
be closed to vehicular traffic and redesigned as a pedestrian promenade?” Approximately eighty-four percent of respondents were in favor of this re-design, while another nine percent
were in favor of occasional closure to vehicular traffic, similar to the current condition on Main Street.
In-road bollard receptacles could also be implemented to
allow for temporary road closures for events for the existing road section of Richmond Street (shown in Figure 3.13), or in conjunction with the Preferred Sidewalk Dining concept (shown
in Figure 3.14).
combination of in-road bollards, similar to those on Main Street, and landscaping on both ends. The pavement could be resurfaced with pedestrian-scale material such as decorative concrete,
pavers, or brick. This Pedestrian Mall is further discussed in Section E3.2, Richmond Street Alternative Concept.Pedestrian Mall segment to allow ongoing temporary closures, while maintaining
vehicle access during non-event periods. a.
Permanently close the Pedestrian Mall segment using a Install in-road bollards or removable bollards at both ends of the
The temporary closure of the half-block of Richmond Street between Grand Avenue and Franklin Avenue should be expanded upon to provide ongoing placemaking opportunities and community
gathering benefits to the Downtown, with one of the following options:1.2.While providing ongoing outdoor dining and placemaking amenities, continued closure of this segment of Richmond
Street would restrict vehicular access and result in the removal of approximately twenty on-street parking spaces.
CHAPTER 3 Pedestrian Malls provide Downtown placemaking opportunities and benefit the community with additional outdoor gathering areas
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
3-24
3-25
Alleys provide an opportunity to provide more engaging and welcoming public spaces
Alley Enhancement Map
GRAND
Figure 3.16
MAIN ST
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
RecommendedNeighborhood AlleyEnhancementsRecommended Service AlleyEnhancements
Alley Enhancements
Street trees and landscape enhancements such as potted plants Entry elements such as decorative paving and/or accent landscaping Trash and recycling receptacle consolidation and concealmentLighting
and facade enhancements
Public art such as murals, paving insets, and sculpture
F.Alleys provide an opportunity to recapture underutilized public space for outdoor activity and can provide more engaging and welcoming public spaces, with enhanced pedestrian connectivity
throughout the Downtown. Alleys are important because they provide for deliveries, services, and parking and they can allow for an alternative pedestrian route off the busy roadways
and connects the public spaces proposed throughout the Specific Plan area. Alleyways in the Downtown are interconnected with paseos that link to key destinations and public parking
areas. Two types of alley enhancements are proposed throughout the Specific Plan: Neighborhood Alleys and Service Alleys (see Figure 3.16, Alley Enhancement Map).All alleyway enhancements
should include:1.2.3.4.5.Consolidated trash and recycling receptacles are concealed within elements that reflect the adjacent architecture
Neighborhood Alley Enhancements
Shaded pedestrian seating and comfortable gathering areas Key alleyway entrances should be highlighted with an overhead element, such as an archway, arbor, or trellis Hanging and twinkle
lights are encouraged but may not be placed adjacent to residential uses
Alleyway between Main Street and Standard Street (between Holly Alleyway between Concord Street and Richmond Street (between El
Avenue to Mariposa Avenue)Segundo Boulevard to Holly Avenue) Clearly defined pedestrian paths of travel with decorative paving Wayfinding and directional signage
1.Neighborhood alleys connect adjacent residential areas with enhanced pedestrian walkways linking to key destinations within the Downtown. Neighborhood alley enhancements are proposed
in the following locations (see Figure 3.16, Alley Enhancement Map):••In addition to the requirements for all alleyways, neighborhood alleys should include:1.2.3.4.5.Overhead elements
are recommended in neighborhood alleyways but must maintain a twenty foot high minimum vertical clearance.
CHAPTER 3
BEFOREAFTER
Alleyways with comfortable pedestrian spaces accentuated with landscaping, public art, and decorative paving link key areas of the Downtown
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
3-26
3-27
AFTER
BEFORE
create a welcoming and vibrant environment
Decorative paving, potted plants and pedestrian amenities
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Service Alley Enhancements
defined pedestrian paths of travel using elements such as decorative paving Back patio and seating areas with bike racks and lockerslandmarks
Alleyway between Main Street and Standard Street (between Holly Alleyway between Concord Street and Richmond Street (between El
Avenue to Mariposa Avenue)Segundo Boulevard to Holly Avenue) Maintain a clear path for delivery and service vehicles with Directional signage and signage for key elements and historic
2.Service alleys include enhanced pedestrian amenities blended and integrated with existing delivery and service uses. Service alleys are proposed in the following locations (see Figure
3.16, Alley Enhancement Map):••In addition to the requirements for all alleyways, service alleys should include:1.2.3.
PARKING
PARKING
ON-STREET
OFF-STREET
e
e
v
n
v
i
A
l
A
k
d
y
n
l
n
l
a
a
or
r
F
H
G
Main
WEEKDAY
Richmond
PARKING UTILIZATION
Parking Utilization Maps
e
v
A Highest utilization of
e
n
off-street parking areas
v
i
d
l
A
n
k
y
a
n
l
r
l
Figure 3.17
a
G
o
r
F
H
Main
WEEKEND
Richmond
PARKING UTILIZATION
Parking Strategies
Existing weekend utilization
CHAPTER 3 G.As part of this Specific Plan effort, a comprehensive parking analysis was prepared to address current and future parking conditions within the Specific Plan area. In May
2022, an existing conditions parking analysis was conducted to evaluate supply and utilization of public parking within the Downtown Specific Plan area. The parking utilization study
investigated the variety of public on-street and off-street spaces that exist throughout the Downtown, including the lots, structure, parallel, and angled spaces (see Figure 3.17 Parking
Utilization Maps). This section further describes the current parking conditions by space type and includes discussion on future parking demand and optimization strategies.
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
3-28
3-29
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Main Street (both directions) Richmond Street (NB)Mariposa Avenue (EB)Pine Avenue (both directions)Holly Avenue (both directions) from western Specific Plan extent to Holly Avenue (WB)
from eastern Specific Plan extent to MarketplaceGrand Avenue (both directions) from eastern Specific Plan extent Grand Avenue (both directions, including median) from Main Street Franklin
Avenue (both directions) Standard Street (both directions) Eucalyptus Drive (both directions)
Marketplaceto Main Streetto western Specific Plan extent
While many streets with parallel parking feature space-delineation striping, some do not. The following parallel on-street parking facilities exist along the street’s entire Downtown
Specific Plan extent, unless otherwise noted:•••••••••••
On-Street Parking
Mariposa Avenue (WB) from Main Street to western Specific Plan Richmond Street (SB) from south of Holly Avenue to southern Holly Avenue (EB) from Main Street to eastern Specific Plan
extent
extentSpecific Plan extent
1.During the Specific Plan Update community engagement period, over half of survey respondents stated that they prefer to use street parking when visiting Downtown El Segundo. Currently,
free on-street parking is available along all streets in Downtown El Segundo, with a 2-hour time limit from 8am to 6pm for most spaces. Several short-term 20-minute parking spaces as
well as accessible spaces are also provided. The design of parking spaces, angled or parallel, varies by street. The existing parking utilization study found approximately eighty percent
and sixty percent utilization of the public on-street parking on the weekday and weekend dates evaluated, respectively.
Downtown Overview Currently, all angled parking within Downtown is “front-in”. The following angled on-street parking facilities exist within Downtown:•••
00
50
108108
80-9080-90
Parking Supply with
Streetscape Concept
Approximate Corridor
The proposed streetscapes for Grand Avenue, Main Street, and Richmond Street, illustrated in Section E, Vehicular Circulation have varying effects on the on-street parking supply on
those streets. Implications on parking supply for each proposed streetscape are discussed in this section and summarized in Table 3-1, On-Street Parking Supply Comparison.
Streetscape Concept
Preferred Road Section (Pedestrian Mobility Emphasis- Class II)Alternative Road Section (Bicycle Mobility Emphasis- Class II)Preferred Road Section (Pedestrian Mobility Emphasis- Class
III)Alternative Road Section (Bicycle Mobility Emphasis - Class II)Alternative Road Section (Bicycle Mobility Emphasis- Cycle-Track)Preferred Road Section (Sidewalk Dining)Alternative
Road Section (Pedestrian Mall)
32
108100
Parking Supply
Existing Corridor
Corridor Extent
El Segundo Boulevard to Mariposa AvenueConcord Street to Eucalyptus StreetFranklin Avenue to Grand Avenue
minimize inefficient parking behavior and draw attention to available spaces. cyclists and other vehicles while exiting parking spaces.to angled parking spaces, where right-of-way allows.
Stripe all available parallel parking spaces with delineation lines to Re-stripe parking spaces to be “back-in” to increase driver visibility of Further investigate the feasibility
of converting parallel parking spaces
Roadway Corridor Main StreetGrand AvenueRichmond Street
Table 3-1: On- Street Parking Supply Comparison
CHAPTER 3 The following on-street parking strategies should be considered to optimize supply and demand within Downtown El Segundo:1.2.3.
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
3-30
3-31
Parking Lots/
Public Parking Map
Potential Future
Parking Structures
Existing Public Surface
Figure 3.18
GRAND
MAIN ST
PUBLIC REALM - MULTIMODAL MOBILITY
Existing Public Surface Parking LotExisting Public Parking Structure
Grand Avenue
Main Street and
on the corner of
Existing surface
parking lot at the
Civic Center, located
Off-Street Parking
2.There are five off-street public parking areas located throughout Downtown (see Figure 3.18, Public Parking Map). The largest surface parking lot, located at the northeast corner of
El Segundo Boulevard and Richmond Street, is private and reserved for Chevron employee parking. Wayfinding signage is currently being used to direct visitors to off-street public parking
areas throughout Downtown. Public surface lots are available at the El Segundo Civic Center, at the northeast corner of Franklin Avenue and Richmond Street, on the east side of Main
Street between Holly Avenue and Pine Avenue, and at the southwest corner of Main Street and Mariposa Avenue. Various reserved customer and employee-only lots also exist throughout the
Downtown, many of which are accessible via the Marketplace Alley.There is one existing public parking structure within Downtown, located at the northeast corner of Grand Avenue and
Richmond Street, which includes just over one hundred spaces. The structure has three levels and comprises approximately one-sixth of the block. There are three entrances and exits
to the structure, on Grand Avenue, Richmond Street, and Marketplace Alley. The new parking structures to replace existing public surface lots could be considered to help serve future
parking demand, particularly for restaurant and retail uses, by increasing general off-street public parking supply. New parking structures could be considered at the northeast corner
of Richmond Street and Franklin Avenue (higher priority), and at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Standard Street (lower priority) (see Figure 3.18, Public Parking Map). Refer
to Chapter 2, Section G, Civic Center District and Section H. 5, Parking Structure Design for additional information.
Pursuing these incremental adjustments to the parking supply based on land use allows more
Consider applying development conditions to projects, in addition to or instead of the in-lieu fee Depending on future development activity, it is possible that provision of off-street
parking in new
Encourage or require subterranean garages for larger new development that is for office or
program, to require the potential for accommodation of shared use of parking.developments could provide parking sooner than publicly developed structures. residential use only. While
more expensive than structures, this is preferable from a massing and urban design standpoint.nimbleness in responding to travel changes through 2040. For example, telecommuting percentages
could vary drastically depending on the type and quantity of office uses being developed.
parking spaces to maximize capacity throughout the day. and increase overall level of knowledge regarding parking availability in Downtown. Increased parking wayfinding signage on streets
adjacent to public parking structures or on-line parking maps.incorporate enhanced wayfinding signage to increase visibility and intensify use as a public parking area. enhanced wayfinding
signage to increase visibility and intensify its use as a public parking area. a.b.c.d.
Implement a shared-parking program in which businesses with different peak hours share reserved Develop informational programs for drivers to direct parkers quickly and efficiently
to available spaces The existing public parking structure at the corner of Richmond Street and Grand Avenue should The existing public parking lot at the corner of Main Street and
Mariposa Avenue should incorporate Address parking demand for future office and residential uses specifically and incrementally:
The existing parking utilization study found approximately seventy percent and fifty percent utilization of the public off-street parking on the weekday and weekend dates evaluated,
respectively. In areas with district-wide parking such as Downtown El Segundo, 85% is an ideal utilization target. This target implies efficient use of supply while still allowing adequate
vacant spaces to facilitate turnover and avoid excess driving to look for parking.The following off-street parking strategies should be considered to optimize supply and demand within
Downtown El Segundo:1.2.3.4.5.
CHAPTER 3 Entrance to the existing parking structure should be enhanced to more clearly depict a public parking garage
Existing parking structure signage in the Downtown PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
3-32
Public Realm -
4
4
Placemaking and Beautification
4-1
PUBLIC REALM - PLACEMAKING AND BEAUTIFICATION
- Ensure an enjoyable, comfortable, and beautified public realm with high-quality amenities and
- Provide attractive multi-use public spaces enhanced with public art for events, entertainment,
- Enhance the entrances and gateways into Downtown and develop the Civic Center Plaza as a focal point
Designate the Core for the community with activities for all ages. Entertainment and Arts socializing, and playing.Streetscape Beautification additional shaded seating and gathering
areas.
Planning Principles Related to Public Realm Beautification: ••••••
CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC REALM – PLACEMAKING AND BEAUTIFICATION A.Introduction The Public Realm – Placemaking and Beautification chapter addresses street design elements, landscaping, gateway
entry treatments, pedestrian paseos and alley enhancements, and other unique public realm features within Downtown El Segundo. The condition of the public realm is important for creating
the desired image and identity of the Downtown and to provide a unified backdrop for the design of various building styles and types. Public realm improvements serve to improve an area’s
visual quality and act as an investment catalyst, encouraging private property upgrades and new development. The intent of this chapter is to provide guidance for the City of El Segundo
in creating a unified and visually attractive environment that supports the Specific Plan goals for beautification of the Downtown.The guidelines in this chapter are intended to be
used as a planning tool for public projects and to guide development conditions of approval for private projects. These guidelines contain concepts, graphic material, recommendations,
and design guidance that will aid in near-term implementation of public area improvements and they are also designed to reinforce the Planning Principles established within Chapter
1 of this document.
Gateway and Wayfinding Signage
Gateways and Entry Monuments
CHAPTER 4 B.Signs are an effective method to reinforce the identity of an area through graphic arts. Distinctive brand and logos, catch words, colors and images can be displayed in
an effective manner to advertise the desired image. Signs also are critical in providing consistency in messages and directions to destinations, such as public parking, public facilities,
key retail centers, parks, and plazas. A cohesive signage program for the Downtown should be developed which includes a logo, gateways and entry treatments, directional wayfinding signs
(vehicular and pedestrian-oriented), and banners to provide consistency and unity within the Downtown. Gateway and wayfinding signage should be well lit at night and should incorporate
a distinctive brand with complementary colors, materials, and lettering fonts to create a cohesive and unique design theme for the Specific Plan area and effectively direct vehicles
and pedestrians to key locations. 1.Gateway and entry monuments help announce important transitions when entering the Downtown and should be used to identify primary entrances into
the Downtown. Gateway signage and entry monuments will help create an identity for the Downtown, announce this area as a special and unique place within the City, and promote the distinct
identity of the Specific Plan area. In addition to serving as entryways, gateways and entry monuments are important for directional and informational signs to guide motorists to their
destinations. The visual design of gateways should be attractive as well as functional, conveying a sense of entry that reflects the importance of the Downtown and conveys the unique
identity of the Specific Plan area. Physical elements of the gateway entries, such as signage, paving materials, and landscape planting materials, should function together to visually
define the entry and establish a positive first impression of the Downtown. Increased landscaping at gateways and entry monuments will help emphasize the entrances to the Downtown.Downtown
El Segundo has existing gateway welcome signs located along El Segundo Boulevard at the intersections of Main Street and Richmond Street, at Grand Avenue at Concord Street and Eucalyptus
Drive, and at Main Street and Mariposa Avenue. The existing Downtown welcome signs should be enhanced to provide more visibility to the key entrances of the Specific Plan area utilizing
the guidelines in this section to clearly denote a sense of arrival. A new secondary gateway is recommended at the intersection of Richmond Street and Holly Avenue to define the entry
into the Richmond District. A hierarchy of gateways should be provided throughout the Specific Plan area to accentuate entries and welcome visitors and residents and there are two types
of gateways identified for the Specific Plan area: Primary and Secondary (see Figure 4.1, Downtown Gateways Map).PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
4-2
4-3
Gateways Map
Downtown
GRAND AVE
Figure 4.1
TT
SSSS
TT
SSSSS
D
N
D
R
OO
OO
M
C
H
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
MAIN ST
N
CC
I
OO
R
C
MARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE
ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE
ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE
ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE
ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEYMARKETPLACE ALLEY
R
D
S
U
TTTTT
PP
YYYYYY
LLLLL
AAAAA
CCCC
STANDARD STSTANDARD STSTANDARD STSTANDARD STSTANDARD STSTANDARD STSTANDARD STSTANDARD STSTANDARD STSTANDARD ST
U
E
PUBLIC REALM - PLACEMAKING AND BEAUTIFICATION
RecommendedPrimary GatewaysRecommended Secondary Gateways
Themed gateway signage should be easily identifiable and enhance the Downtown entrances
accentuated with landscaping. at the back of the sidewalk or within raised medians to increase visibility for motorists, but gateway elements shall not obscure safe vehicular sight lines.sides
of the roadway.should be in proportion to adjacent buildings and landscaped areas.should be designed to complement the style of the Downtown should be provided which utilize high-quality
materials and fixtures that reflect the Specific Plan area’s architectural character.
Gateway signs should be colorful, lit for increased visibility, Gateway signs should be prominently placed permanently Where practical, gateway features should be placed on both
Gateway signs should be well proportioned, and the scale Easily identifiable and aesthetically pleasing entrances
To create a unique identity and establish unity throughout the Specific Plan Area, a logo or themed sign program should be developed to distinguish this area and the chosen sign or logo
should be repeated throughout the Downtown gateways. 1.2.3.4.5.
textured) at intersections and sidewalks
Primary gateway signage Decorative walls with pilasters Enhanced decorative paving (colored and Ornamental landscaping Pedestrian scale accent lighting Secondary gateway signage Decorative
walls or fencing Enhanced decorative paving Pedestrian scale accent lighting
Primary Gateways Primary Gateways should include a combination of the following accent features where practical:1.2.3.4.5.Secondary Gateways Secondary Gateways should include a combination
of the following accent features where practical:1.2.3.4.
CHAPTER 4 Gateway signage and accent features visually define the entries into the Downtown PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
4-4
4-5
Wayfinding signage oriented to vehicular traffic defines the Downtown area and effectively directs visitors to key destinations in the Downtown
PUBLIC REALM - PLACEMAKING AND BEAUTIFICATION
Vehicular Directional Signs
with directional arrows and labeling to denote key shopping areas, public parking, civic buildings, and tourist attractions.Directional signs should be oriented to vehicular traffic.
Selected signs should be lit, landscaped, and placed permanently at roadsides or within medians at key locations around the Downtown. These signs shall be smaller than the City gateways
but similar in style.of similar materials and colors, and utilize the same fonts.clear and accurate information to navigate.the area and not overburden an individual with unnecessary
information. information such as proximity to bus stops, and notable landmarks, and providing information on businesses and public parking areas, interactive kiosks, and digital parking
systems within public wayfinding and signage programs.such as site furnishings and lighting.
The directional sign program should include a common directional sign Directional signs should be smaller than the City gateways but constructed Signage should “explain the environment”
around an individual and provide Signage should only contain information that is relevant to the context of Signage should be provided for local resident and visitors by providing
New technology should be utilized, such as mobile applications, Signage should relate in design to adjacent streetscape improvements
2.Directional signs should be located at key locations to direct vehicles through the Downtown. A clear and attractive directional sign system is vital in the Downtown is to provide
direction to important services and destinations such as public parking, city hall, library, and performance venues. 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.
Pedestrian Wayfinding Signage
3.Wayfinding signage refers to any sign that provides direction and generally helps pedestrians find their way through the Downtown, navigate their location, and facilitate a smooth
experience. A comprehensive approach to wayfinding should be developed for use by visitors and tourists which helps to orient pedestrians around the Downtown.Downtown El Segundo has
an attractive and cohesive wayfinding signage program installed at the Civic Center. Elements of this existing wayfinding signs are recommended to be repeated in the Downtown signage,
such as the black color and fonts; however, some color is suggested to create more visual interest and character.
Existing wayfinding signage at the City Hall Complex
CHAPTER 4 Wayfinding signage provides direction and helps to orient pedestrians around the Downtown PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
4-6
4-7
PUBLIC REALM - PLACEMAKING AND BEAUTIFICATION
Directional kiosks guide pedestrians throughout the Downtown and can include information about local events and key destinations
palette throughout the Downtown.information, and local business advertising space.
Adjacent major transit stops and outside public parking garages. Within key Downtown areas such as the Civic Center Plaza, to
inform and guide people to their intended destinations. Directional kiosks should be the same size, shape, and color Kiosks should include Specific Plan area maps, city events
Directional Kiosks A directional kiosk is a type of information display that helps people find their way through Downtown spaces. The kiosks are intended for pedestrian use and includes
wayfinding information such as maps, directories, and directional displays with the goal of getting people from one location to another.Directional kiosks should be located:••A unique
directional kiosk should be developed to complement the overall Downtown signage and reflect the Downtown theme.1.2.
Street Furnishings and Improvements
1.Street furnishings consist of amenities placed within the public right-of-way, such as decorative streetlights with banners, benches, trash and recycling containers, bicycle racks,
and bollards to define special edge conditions, and special attractions at select locations such as public art and other focal elements. Street furnishings serve an aesthetic as well
as utilitarian function and can enliven and provide variety to outdoor spaces used for public interaction and serve to attract pedestrians and create a lively and festive atmosphere.
Streetscape elements and amenities should selected for their durability and ease of maintenance along with their ability to create timeless visual appeal, and to upgrade the function
and attractiveness of the urban environment.
Streetscape Design and Pedestrian Amenities
CHAPTER 4 C.This section describes the streetscaping elements and improvements that create a special identity for the Downtown. The Specific Plan area will have consistent streetscape
treatment throughout all districts to develop a unified theme and atmosphere for a cohesive Downtown. The streetscape improvements described in this section are a key ingredient in
changing the predominant character of the area from an auto-oriented environment to a pedestrian-oriented Downtown, and distinctive design treatments and pedestrian amenities will create
the character and sense of place and create an easily identifiable and distinctive Downtown core. Main Street’s distinctive design treatments and pedestrian amenities create a sense
of place and distinctive Downtown core PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
4-8
4-9
Existing Downtown benches,
trash receptacles, and bike racks
PUBLIC REALM - PLACEMAKING AND BEAUTIFICATION
with disabilities shall be incorporated into the design and location of furnishings. This includes a provision for space adjacent to walkways for wheelchair and/or stroller parking.rather
than scattered. Trash and recycling cans shall be located near benches. A greater frequency of the number of furnishings should be in higher-use pedestrian traffic areas. Street furnishings
should be selected to ensure maintainability, durability, and vandal resistance. street furniture elements to ensure a good longer-term appearance.Outdoor furniture shall be provided
in public gathering spaces to encourage pedestrian activity. Design of materials and colors of outdoor furniture and hardscape elements shall complement surrounding building architecture.
Black color should be used for street furnishings in the right-of-way, with the use of a bright accent color for alleyway and paseo furnishings.on location and use.
Street furniture should be located along street edge of sidewalk. Provisions to accommodate persons To create a more organized and efficient use of sidewalk space, furnishings should
be grouped together Items should be securely anchored to the sidewalk, and a graffiti-resistant coating shall be applied to Placement of street furnishings can be temporary or permanent,
and either fixed or movable, depending
Downtown El Segundo has an attractive and cohesive street furnishings program in place which includes elements such as benches, bike racks, and trash receptacles. The existing furnishing
program is recommended to be continued and enhanced using a combination of streetscape improvements to further define the Downtown character and better reinforce a unified design theme
for the Specific Plan area, and the use of color to accentuate key locations. Locations of street furnishing shall be determined through the implementation of this Specific Plan and
review of public improvement design plans. Some of the envisioned public improvements will require private property owner participation and/or cooperation at the time of project development.
1.2.3.4.5.6.
and create a distinct sense of place and urban character
Tree grates should be used to expand the usable pedestrian space
Tree Grates
to be in the sidewalk area. surface and must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. tree grows and may include light openings for up lighting.
The use of tree grates is required where street trees are proposed New tree grates should be safe for pedestrian use as a walking Tree grates should have breakouts that are easily
removed as the
b.Tree grates should be used around street trees to expand the usable space within the pedestrian realm and create a distinctive sense of place. Tree grates provide for increased pedestrian
area on the sidewalk while reinforcing the desired urban character. 1.2.3.
Benches and Trash Receptacles
benches and/or chairs located in an L-shape to allow for social interaction. street or primary walkway. hundred (300) feet apart to provide convenient and attractive resting places
along the street. sleeping and benches should be clustered with trash receptacles, street trees, street lighting, and other key furnishing elements to create comfortable and inviting
seating areas in the Downtown.convenient waste disposal in key locations such as entries, seating areas, bus stops, and along walkways throughout the Specific Plan area. furnishings
and should be placed away and/or located downwind from seating areas where feasible.
Where feasible, it is preferable to design seating areas with Where single benches are used, they should be oriented to the Benches should be placed every one hundred (100) feet
to three Benches with a back and arm rests should be utilized to prohibit Trash and recycling receptacles should be placed to provide Trash receptacles should be used in conjunction
with other
CHAPTER 4 a.Benches provide areas for resting or socializing and trash receptacles contribute to the maintenance and beautification of the Downtown area and should be placed to improve
the pedestrian experience. 1.2.3.4.5.6.PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
4-10
4-11
in front of City Hall
Bus shelter on Main Street
Bus Shelters and Transit Stops
PUBLIC REALM - PLACEMAKING AND BEAUTIFICATION
uncluttered appearance. Provide benches and lighting for the comfort of passengers waiting for their transit vehicle and take the needs of disabled users into consideration.
Locate throughout the Downtown, and have a unifying, clean, and
d.Bus shelters and transit stops are important elements for Downtown circulation needs. 1.2.
well lit and as close to the main entrance of the destination as possible and placed in the most convenient space available.and their capacity should be determined by the location and
the number of bicyclists who frequent the destination. when bikes are on the racks, or when maneuvering bikes to and from racks. Bicycle rack placement shall maintain at least six
feet clearance from curb lines, street trees, street furnishings and building storefronts to allow for bicycle maneuvering. Where feasible, bicycles should be parked parallel to the
sidewalk to keep the maneuvering of them out of the pedestrian zone.
Bike racks should be installed at highly visible locations that are Bike racks should accommodate a minimum of two bicycles Bike racks should be located to not block pedestrian
circulation
c. Bike Racks Well placed and secure bike racks will encourage bicycle ridership and promotion of alternative forms of travel in the Downtown area. The existing Downtown bike racks
with the Downtown El Segundo logo should be continued throughout the Specific Plan area with additional bike racks located at public plazas, paseos, transit stops, parking structures
and parking lots, and popular destinations in the Downtown. The existing black color should be continued within the public right-of-way, with brighter colors used on bike racks within
alleyways, paseos, and parking areas to increase visibility. 1.2.3.
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
e.Street lighting plays both an aesthetic and safety role in the Downtown. The Downtown pedestrian lighting should contribute to the safe and efficient use of Downtown streets, alleys,
and paseos. Pedestrian scale lighting shall be provided along sidewalks and pedestrian pathways, particularly in areas where street beautification and higher pedestrian use is desired,
such as transit stops and along Main Street, Grand Avenue, Richmond Street, and within the Civic Center District area.Downtown El Segundo has an existing vehicular scale streetlight
with single and double arms that utilizes a distinctive bell-shaped street light fixture and includes a flag and banner attachment. Additionally, there are existing decorative poles
with hanging plants installed in the Downtown. Richmond Street has pedestrian scale light poles installed which help define the historic character and create a sense of pedestrian
scale. The existing light fixtures and hanging planters are recommended to be continued in the Specific Plan area with pedestrian scale fixtures added on the sidewalk side of the primary
roadways where feasible for increased human scale, safety, and visual interest. Pedestrian scale accent lighting should be added to paseos and alleyways to develop a more cohesive and
active pedestrian focused Downtown environment.
hanging plants on Main Street
Existing decorative poles with
accent lighting in key locations
Consider integrating decorative
CHAPTER 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
Existing vehicular (left) and pedestrian scale (right) streetlights in the DowntownPedestrian scale lighting include banners and hanging plants to maximize visual interest
4-12
4-13
Accent lighting enhances and activates the nighttime environment
PUBLIC REALM - PLACEMAKING AND BEAUTIFICATION
enhance security and encourage evening activities and help to unify the Specific Plan area. gathering areas, parking lots and other areas where evening activity occurs will help to create
an exciting nighttime environment.Provide “Twinkle” or similar string lights in street trees within key pedestrian areas to enhance the nighttime environment. String lighting and up
lighting is suggested at accent areas such as primary intersections, public plazas, and outdoor dining and gathering areas and shall be located twenty feet minimum above roadway grades
and not obstruct traffic.high level of nighttime pedestrian activity or views are anticipated.pedestrian zones from vehicle traffic at intersections, and to create a refuge for pedestrians
near alleyways. ambiance. The quality of light, level of light and type of bulb or source should be carefully selected so that lighting levels do not draw attention to the glow or
glare of the project site.devices, such as light sensors) is required. Where feasible, use warm white lighting source types. Timers and sensors should be incorporated to avoid unnecessary
lighting.shall be provided and all public plazas and at key intersections along Main Street and Grand Avenue.Streetlight poles should be equipped with an additional hanging or cantilevered
fixture to allow for the attachment of banners.
Pedestrian lighting should be human scaled and placed evenly along sidewalks to Integrate a variety of different lighting types and intensities at entries, public Accent up lighting
on trees and focal points is encouraged at key locations where a Bollard lighting should be used to define public plazas and walkways, to delineate Over lighting of sites should
be prevented to avoid ruining desired nighttime Energy-efficient lighting (lighting from renewable sources and energy-saving Use full or partial cut-off lighting fixtures to minimize
light pollution and glare. Electrical service for seasonal/event lighting in all streetlights and at street trees
1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.
Street Banners
the Downtown area signage and gateways.to avoid distracting motorists and creating traffic hazards. reinforce the unique character of the Downtown Specific Plan area.extensions, plazas,
paseos, and key outdoor seating areas. elements, such as color and style.
Banner should be clearly legible, and designed to be compatible with Lettering should be clear, precise, and simple, with minimal graphics The City logo should be an integral part
of the sign design to Waist-high safety bollards should be used to define selected sidewalk Bollards should be reflective of the primary adjacent architectural Bollards should
incorporate lighting at key public gathering areas.
f.Banners are an easy and inexpensive way to promote the theme of the Downtown. Banners can enhance the aesthetic environment, unify the appearance of the streetscape, and introduce
color and a sense of cohesion to an area. Banners can also communicate and promote annual cultural and civic events and seasonal holiday displays. Banners may be changed periodically
to provide advertisement for special events and promotions.1.2.3.g.Bollards Properly placed, bollards help to delineate between vehicle and pedestrian zones, creating a safe walking
environment. Retractable bollards, such as those existing on Main Street just north of Grand Avenue, allow for temporary roadway closure while maintaining vehicle access during non-event
periods. 1.2.3.
An existing bollard in front of the Old Town Music Hall on Richmond Street
CHAPTER 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
An example of an existing banner in the DowntownDecorative bollards delineate primary pedestrian areas and create a safer walking and gathering environment
4-14
4-15
Downtown with Heritage Walk
circles located along the street
Existing decorative paving in the
PUBLIC REALM - PLACEMAKING AND BEAUTIFICATION
Decorative skate protection adds character and visual appeal to streetscape elements
Skate ProtectionDecorative Paving
aesthetic appeal and is consistent with the primary adjacent architectural elements.being protected.
A custom skate stop should be utilized that adds character and Skate stops must allow for continued public use of the element
h.Skate Stops and anti-skating hardware devices designed to prevent skaters from using street furnishings, walls, stairs, and raised planters for performing stunts should be installed
in areas where protection is anticipated, such as plazas.1.2.i.Decorative paving should be utilized throughout the Specific Plan area to develop a recognizable sense of place and is
suggested at entrances and recommended to combine with other streetscape elements to maximize the visibility and impact of key areas in the Downtown. The Specific Plan area has utilized
an attractive and cohesive decorative paving at sidewalks and crosswalks at intersections along Main Street and Grand Avenue that consists of stamped concrete with a random stone pattern
in a tan color. The Heritage Walk is designated throughout the Downtown with circles inset in the sidewalk paving in a playful linear pattern along the frontage. The existing Heritage
Walk circles and intersection paving should remain and be implemented throughout the Specific Plan area along with decorative paving enhancements in key locations.
Richmond Street between Franklin Avenue and Grand AvenueMain Street between Grand Avenue and Holly Avenue
local culture and history, such as mosaics and tiles inset in paving with historic images, or concrete etching or plaques commemorating El Segundo’s history, natural environment, and
culture.shall be maintained and repaired rather than replaced with new paving, where feasible. surrounding paving materials and colors. visual interest and reduce the visual impact
of parking areas. The use of permeable paving materials consistent with City building codes are recommended to minimize runoff.parking areas, and applicable plazas, outdoor dining,
and paseos shall be rated for vehicular use. Where emergency vehicle access is required, paving shall be rated to withstand loads of emergency vehicles.
Key intersections, gateways, primary alleyway entrances, paseos and plazas, primary Within travel and parking lanes so the street can be better utilized as a community gathering
pedestrian entries to buildings, outdoor dining, bicycle parking areas, and outdoor seating areas. areas during street closures for temporary events at: Decorative insets are recommended
within paving throughout the Downtown to highlight the Old and historic paving (including decorative tiles and old contractor stamps and dates) Decorative paving areas should incorporate
infill doors for utilities to match the Enhance parking lots and key parking areas using decorative paving materials that create Decorative paving within vehicular areas, such as
travel lanes, crosswalks, alleyways,
In addition, cohesive decorative paving with bolder colors and patterns that are consistent with the architectural character of the Downtown should be used in the following locations
of the Specific Plan area to create vibrancy and identity for the Downtown:••Decorative paving materials should be unique and recognizable, durable, timeless, non-slip and ADA accessible.
Special attention should be made to the selection of a variety of cohesive paving materials to accentuate key areas and create the Downtown area as a unified pedestrian friendly and
special place. 1.2.3.4.5.
CHAPTER 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
A variety of cohesive decorative paving materials creates vibrancy and identity for the Downtown
4-16
4-17
and can reinforce the culture and history of the area
Murals contribute to the special character of the Downtown
PUBLIC REALM - PLACEMAKING AND BEAUTIFICATION
Public Art
Key intersections and entriesAccent focal points in alleyways, paseos, and plazas Primary bus shelters, outdoor dining, and major bicycle parking
areas
D.The use of public art within the Downtown is an effective way of expressing the unique personality and character of the community. Public art is one of the most desirable elements
to personalize an urban environment and connect it to a community’s own unique and special character. Public art should serve as an aesthetic improvement to enhance the pedestrian
environment and should focus on the region’s local culture, environment, and history.The Specific Plan area contains the El Segundo Museum of Art and several existing murals, and the
Downtown has an established art character and influence. The City of El Segundo hosts an Art Walk in June, July, and August where local businesses act as pop-up galleries and art studio
to display original local art works and the event draws visitors to the Downtown area. Public art is suggested in the following locations:•••Art and focal points placed within the
Downtown should represent the community, showcase the culture and history of El Segundo, and/or capture or reinforce the unique character of place.
benches and trash containers, decorative streetlights, signs, and paving patterns or it can be used as a special placemaking feature and integrated into gateways, stair risers, railings,
fencing, walls, or raised pilasters. Manhole covers, drain grates, above ground utility panels and tree grates within key public spaces should be designed as decorative features to
enhance the pedestrian streetscape environment.and murals representing the area’s unique history and people of significance, can be used as a wayfinding feature to attract pedestrians
to key locations such as a plaza or paseo.Public art is encouraged on large blank walls in alleyways and paseos and is recommended on the existing public parking structure located at
the corner of Grand Avenue and Richmond Street.as a plaza or architectural feature and be an integral part of site development rather than a stand-alone, separate object. The selection
and placement of public art should be part of the overall site design process, rather than an afterthought to a project. interactive interpretive exhibits and displays are recommended.obstruct
a pedestrian pathway, create a traffic hazard, or compete with another piece of art within the area.Public art should be highlighted with decorative paving and accent lighting where
appropriate.
Art can be integral to other public improvements, such as unique Larger pieces of public art, such as interpretive sculptures Public art should be in conjunction with other site
features such Public art is encouraged that invites participation and includes Public art should be placed to avoid locations where it may
1.2.3.4.5.6.7.
Tree grate incorporating decorative placemaking features
Public art is encouraged in a variety of sizes and forms throughout the Downtown to create a lively and evolving streetscape that is unique to El Segundo
Existing public art on above ground utility panels
CHAPTER 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
4-18
4-19
unified streetscene that contributes to the Downtown identity
The landscape character along Main Street provides texture and color to create a
PUBLIC REALM - PLACEMAKING AND BEAUTIFICATION
E.Landscaping Landscaping is a key element to creating unified street scenes and softening otherwise discordant roadways. Adding scale, comfort, foliage colors, and textures contribute
to the Downtown’s unique identity and help improve air quality. Landscaping should be layered with a variety of shapes, textures, and colors and utilize drought-tolerant and California
native plants to reduce irrigation and conserve water. Planting areas should use a combination of trees, shrubs, and ground cover to enhance the appearance and enjoyment of the Downtown
and soften the visual impact of buildings and paving. Landscaping provisions of ESMC Chapter 15A in regards to water conservation should be met, such as 15-15A-5, landscape documentation
package and water efficient planting and irrigation requirements. Trees and understory planting should be selected based on leaf and flower color, and it is recommended to be highly
selective with color and limit planting to either warm or cool colors. Avoid sharp contrasts in color except where desired for accent planting and provide transitions between warm
and cool colors with neutral greens, whites, and grays. Consider the texture of leaves and bark in the selection of plants and maximize contrasting textures where feasible for increased
visual interest. Landscaping for the Specific Plan area should be well adapted to the climate in El Segundo, and the use of drought-tolerant species are recommended. In addition, mulch
should be applied during construction and throughout the life of the plants to retain soil moisture and enhance plant growth.
5-gallon
:
24-inch box or larger
15-gallon containers or larger
24-inch box or larger typical, with thirty
15-gallon containers or larger
1-gallon containers or larger
Street and Median Tree Planting
Large Evergreen Trees: Large Accent Deciduous and Specimen Trees: Small Accent Deciduous Trees:Vines and Espaliers: Large Shrubs - greater than five feet in diameterSmall Shrubs (excluding
groundcovers) – less than five feet in
percent or more in 36-inch boxtypical, with forty percent or more in 36-inch box, and ten percent or more 48-inch boxcontainers or larger diameter:
Plants within the Downtown Specific Plan area should meet the following minimum size requirements at time of planting:•••••1.Tree species should be selected for suitability within the
Downtown boundary and within the specific area to be planted. The overall selection of tree species should be based upon the tree’s overall ability to provide pedestrian-friendly benefits,
such as shade from summer heat, storefront visibility and general aesthetics which contribute to a vibrant downtown. Species should be hardy and not easily affected by extreme temperatures,
wind, water supply, or handling. Highly visible areas, such as seating areas, gateways, and intersections, should be planted with ornamental and interesting species that exhibit contrasting
foliage, color, and texture. Trees should not interfere with necessary sight distance lines for passing traffic. The selected tree species should require minimal maintenance and should
exhibit a clean and healthy appearance in all seasons of the year.
•
CHAPTER 4 Large scale trees with ornamental foliage and/ or dense canopies for shade contribute to a vibrant and comfortable Downtown PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
4-20
4-21
Trees with thorns or spiky leaves and a high amount of litter Trees with wet fruit or large seed pods may be utilized but Trees adjacent to buildings should have mature sizes in scale
Trees with lower heights and low root damage potential are
Trees should be selected to be low maintenance with minimal Trees within five feet of hardscaping, walls and foundations
and leaf drop should not be used in parking areas or along pedestrian walkways.should be setback away from any paved areas including sidewalks, streets, and parking lot paving.leaf drop
and selected for long-lived and disease resistant species.with the massing and height of the structure.recommended for small planter areas and accent planting areas.should have low
root damage potential and be installed with root barriers to prevent roots from encroaching and the buckling of pavements and structures.
PUBLIC REALM - PLACEMAKING AND BEAUTIFICATION
selected with the objective of providing shade and minimizing maintenance and litter. a.b.c.which carry minimal risk of raising gutters and sidewalks should be selected. Trees should
be selected based on the size of the planter to minimize root intrusion, and the height of the adjacent structures to soften views.a.b.c.
Trees along walkways and parking areas should be carefully Tree species that are suitable to the size of the planting area and
4.5.
feet on center and shall be provided to form the canopy, provide shade, introduce seasonal color, and define the street edge. are recommended. A mix of deciduous and evergreen species
should be provided for year-round shade and interest. conflicts with functions of adjacent businesses. The trees should not block views of storefront businesses or signs to the greatest
extent possible. The location of trees should be planned to provide openings for street lighting and utilities and continue to allow for viewing building entrances and historical facades.
Street trees shall be spaced approximately twenty feet to forty For each block on a street, no more than three street tree species Street tree placement shall be carefully considered
to avoid
Street trees should provide visual interest as well as complement the streetscape. Trees should be designed to contain a mix of deciduous and evergreen species for seasonal interest
and year-long shade. In general, place deciduous accent trees at entries, intersections and driveways and locate evergreen trees along extent of the corridor. Deciduous trees with open
branching are suggested at retail areas to provide views of the facades and shade trees with dense evergreen canopies should be used in front of residential uses to provide privacy.
Deciduous trees that provide summer shade and allow for winter solar gain should be utilized whenever possible adjacent to buildings. Evergreen trees with a high, broad branching structure
are encouraged along walkways and parking areas to shade walking surfaces and parking spaces.1.2.3.
poles and roots will not impact underground utility lines.to encourage root spreading to minimize sidewalk displacement and curb, gutter, street and/or infrastructure damage. Install
structural soil systems to direct new root growth downward below hardscape areas to help minimize root damage caused to the surrounding hardscape and structures. amounts of shade are
preferred for the Downtown. Flowering trees should be used in areas such as gateways, key intersections, mid-block pedestrian crossings, and other focal points that deserve visual
emphasis. Tree grates are suggested within sidewalks and plaza spaces, as these allow for improved accessibility and increased sidewalk usability area and are consistent with the desired
urban character. The ultimate size of the tree trunk should be considered when choosing grates; the grate opening should be appropriately sized to accommodate a mature tree.Existing
large, mature, and healthy street trees should remain where feasible, such as the Ficus trees in the median on Grand Avenue.
Trees should be located so the canopy will not conflict with light For areas with new street trees, structural soil should be used Trees that provide attractive fall colors, seasonal
flowers, or large
6.7.8.9.10.
Large established Ficus trees in the median on Grand Avenue
CHAPTER 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
Tree grates increase usability of the sidewalk and enhance the urban character
4-22
4-23
Integrate a variety of landscaping with planter pots and raised planters
planting along Main Street
Existing sidewalk parkway
PUBLIC REALM - PLACEMAKING AND BEAUTIFICATION
Median Shrub Planting
Sidewalk Parkway and
2.Sidewalk parkway planting in the Specific Plan area should include shrubs and groundcovers within a variety of configurations such as planter pots, landscaped planters/parkways, raised
planters, plaza landscaping, and parking lot screening and shading. Sidewalk parkway planting should consist of a mix of plants that will provide year-round interest. Seasonal flowers
and evergreen shrubs in parkways, potted plants, and raised planters are encouraged where there is sufficient sidewalk space. Perennial and deciduous species and seasonal grasses should
not make up the mass of planting areas, and longer-lived evergreen shrubs should be intermixed throughout to provide year-round interest and longevity.To achieve a cohesive appearance
and maintain the urban landscape, joint participation between private property owners and the City will be required. Some of the beautification efforts can be simply implemented by
the City as funding is secured. Cooperation and participation by individual property owners, merchants, special interest groups, and others will be required with the future property
development.
pedestrian areas and plants that attract bees or are poisonous should not be used at pedestrian seating areas.Choose species that are hardy and not easily affected by extreme temperatures,
wind, water supply, or handling. Near pedestrian traffic, it is important to anticipate some amount of damage to plants and irrigation, and tougher plant materials will help to maintain
an attractive streetscape appearance.Potted plants and raised planters should be used along the streetscape to add color and visual interest and be located at entries and corners as
accent elements. Raised planters should be designed to accommodate comfortable seating where feasible and incorporate decorative insets and elements such as tiles and skateboard deterrents.Planting
s should be used to soften and screen blank walls and fencing, parking areas, utilities, and service areas. Dense and fast-growing evergreen species should be selected for screening
and deciduous and grass-like plant species should not be used for screening purposes. issues. At crosswalks and driveway entrances, keep plant material below eighteen inches in height
for pedestrian visibility.
Plants with thorns, spines, or sharp leaves should not be used along Be aware of necessary sight distance lines for passing traffic and safety
4.5.6.7.8.Blue Butterfly Habitat Enhancement The El Segundo Blue Butterfly is an endangered species and it’s primary food source, Erigonium parvifolium (Sea Cliff Buckwheat), is encouraged
in sheltered and less traveled areas to provide additional habitat in the Downtown. Buckwheat is a perennial and should be placed in the background or center of planter areas and intermixed
with other evergreen and non-invasive native shrubs. Buckwheat prefers full sun and low water and tolerates a range of soil conditions. Buckwheat should not be pruned until the butterflies
have emerged in the summer.
The use of perennials should be minimized and are suggested at
key focal points and gateways only.
such as near seating areas, gateways, and intersections. Use plants with contrasting foliage, color, and texture; scented varieties; or those that have an especially interesting bloom
or special qualities (e.g. spring flowers and/or good fall color) to unify the Downtown and identify it as a place of special destination.good all year to ensure a clean and healthy
appearance. Parkways and medians should utilize low maintenance, long-lived, and durable plantings. a.succulents should be used for accent and other unique functions in appropriate
locations, such as at corners, mid-block crossings and gateways.
Choose ornamental and interesting species for highly visible areas Choose species that need minimal maintenance and tend to look A variety of accent species with flowers, grasses
and/or
CHAPTER 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
1.2.3.Ornamental shrub plantings with contrasting foliage and texture accentuate focal points, key intersections, and gateways
4-24
Public Facilities
Infrastructure and
5
5
5-1
INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
City Hall Complex on Main Street
CHAPTER 5: INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC FACILITIESA.Introduction Infrastructure and public facilities are essential to the success of the El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan. This section
describes existing and proposed infrastructure such as water, wastewater, storm drainage, and dry utilities and the public facilities which support the Specific Plan area.
Water Supply
CHAPTER 5 B.Infrastructure 1.The Specific Plan area is serviced by both potable and non-potable water (see Figure 5.1, Water Supply Map). Potable water is drinking water that comes
from surface water and groundwater sources and is treated to levels that meet state and federal standards for consumption. Non-potable water (recycled water) is not suitable for public
consumption as it does not meet drinking water standards. Non-potable water is typically used for landscape irrigation.Potable Water The Specific Plan area is serviced by two pressure
zones: the low-pressure zone and high-pressure zone. The low-pressure zone obtains supply from the high-pressure zone through a series of valves operated by a 200,000 gallon above-ground
reservoir. The southerly portion of the Specific Plan area is serviced by the High Pressure Zone, which is a closed zone system, and obtains imported water from Metropolitan Water District
(MWD). The City has a 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (prepared by Risk Management Professionals) and the 2005 Water Master Plan (prepared by AKM Consulting Engineers). Both plans
are used by the Public Works Department for operations and maintenance of the distribution system and water storage facilities as well as development of capital improvement projects.The
City has a ‘closed system’ for potable water supply. The north-south trending alleys within the Specific Plan study area contain six and eight inch diameter potable water mains. Services
can be connected to these mains to serve the existing development. Main and Richmond Streets do not contain water mains. There is a water main within Grand Avenue, Pine Avenue, and
Mariposa Avenue. Fire water is served through the hydrants located throughout the project area. Hydrants are located on each major street in the study area. There is adequate fire flow
within the potable water system to serve occupancy loads now and in the future. The adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Program identifies city-wide projects funded by the City’s
Water Fund which includes a water main replacement on Grand Avenue. Annual, typical water main maintenance, valve replacement projects, and general water maintenance projects are done
annually as needed for the system.PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
5-2
5-3
INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
Non-Potable Water The City is the purveyor of non-potable water supply (recycled water). In general, the West Basin Municipal Water District (WBMWD) is a wholesaler of both potable
and recycled water. WBMWD owns and operates a disinfected tertiary water system that is maintained under a contract (or third-party contractor) through West Basin. WBMWD sells recycled
water at a specific rate to the City, and the City bills and sells the water through their own rate structure program. The WBMWD constructed a secondary effluent force main project,
which contains several pipelines, in the early 1990s. Beneath Grand Avenue, three separate pipelines convey brine through an eighteen inch diameter pipe, secondary effluent through
a sixty (60) inch diameter pipe, and recycled water through a twenty inch diameter pipe. Beneath Mariposa Avenue between Eucalyptus Drive and Virginia Street a six inch diameter recycled
water pipe is present. The adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement program does not identify proposed recycled water improvements in the Specific Plan area. However, should the City amend
the agreement or collaborate with WBMWD for future needs, the recycled water systems are a feasible candidate for use in landscape areas and not rely on potable water for irrigation.
Water Supply Map
Figure 5.1
High Pressure Potable Zone
Low Pressure
Potable Zone
Potable WaterNon-Potable Water
CHAPTER 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
5-4
5-5
INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
Wastewater ServicesStormwater Management
2.The Specific Plan area is serviced by typical, subsurface sanitary sewer pipelines for handling wastewater services. The sewer mains are owned by the City of El Segundo, and the Public
Works Wastewater Division provides routine maintenance in compliance with the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. Within the study area there are eight, ten, and twelve inch diameter mains
(the twelve inch is primarily beneath Standard Street and Grand Avenue) within the Specific Plan area’s public streets and alleys except for the 300 through 400 blocks of Main Street,
100 to 200 blocks of Grand Avenue, and 100 through 200 blocks of Richmond Street. These blocks are serviced by mains located within the alleys. Ultimately, sewage is treated by the
Hyperion Wastewater Treatment Facility owned and operated by the City of Los Angeles located west of the Los Angeles International Airport.A solid and complete maintenance program is
integral to the success of the longevity and performance of the sewer, especially in the study area where grease from dining establishments can cause additional distress on the sewer.
The maintenance program should be implemented and monitored along with capital improvement projects for upgrades. The adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Program identifies city-wide
projects funded by the City’s Wastewater Fund. No specific improvements are identified within the Specific Plan area, however, there is an annual programmed budget for general wastewater
infrastructure replacements.3.The Specific Plan area is unique and has some drainage challenges locally due to the variances in surface elevations. In general, the majority of the
drainage is sheet-flow type conditions within the roadway and alley network. In addition, the Specific Plan area is located within Flood Zone Z-Area of minimal flood hazards and not
affected by a 500-year event.The adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Program identifies city-wide projects which include annual funding programmed towards unidentified infiltration
projects. There are plans for low impact development (LID) improvements within the City Hall Plaza.
Dry Utilities
CHAPTER 5 4.The Specific Plan area contains dry utilities, such as telephone, TV, internet, electric, and natural gas that service the community. The City of El Segundo assesses a Utility
Users Tax (UUT) on commercial properties that fund telecommunications, electrical, and gas services. The City partners with Avenue Insights and Analytics for UUT support at no expense.Telecommunicat
ions-Cable and Internet Service AT&T and Spectrum provide telecommunications, cable, and internet services in the Specific Plan area. These carriers are expected to meet current and
future demands of land uses. Electricity Service Southern California Edison (SoCal Edison) provides electricity service in the Specific Plan Area. Existing transmission and distribution
are adequate to meet and the current and future demands of the proposed land uses. The Public Utilities Commission of the State of California outlines the regulations for SoCal Edison.Chapter
3 of Title 11-Public Utilities in the El Segundo Municipal Code outlines provisions for underground districts. Both Title 14-Subdivision Regulations and Title 15-Zoning Regulations
do not contain specific codified criteria for undergrounding a specific project, nor does the City have an undergrounding policy at the preparation of this Specific Plan for development
projects. Although City staff may require a project to underground utilities as a condition of approval. However, the City Council, by Resolution, may adopt an underground district.
Currently, the project area does not have an underground district but may in the future should City Council deem it necessary. Natural Gas The Southern California Gas Company (SoCal
Gas) provides gas service to the Project Area. SoCal Gas has confirmed that there are facilities in the area and service would be provided in accordance with SoCal Gas’ policies and
extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made on a project-by-project basis.PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
5-6
5-7
INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
Schools, Parks, and Other Public Services
Because the EOC is critical to public safety and is the focal point for coordinating the City’s emergency planning, training, response, and recovery efforts, the city utilizes an Emergency
Management Team comprised of key agency staff specifically trained to handle emergencies. This typically includes those from various city departments, including those from police and
fire. The EOC is also used as a training facility for conducting regular employee training to handle emergency preparedness, response, and recovery operations. Fire Station No. 1 is
located at 314 Main Street adjacent to the Civic Center Complex and will serve the Specific Plan area with fire, rescue, emergency, and medical services.2.Schools The El Segundo Unified
School District offices are located outside the Specific Plan area at 641 Sheldon Street. The District provides elementary, middle, and high school education services to approximately
3,448 students citywide. There are two existing schools situated just north of the Specific Plan boundary: El Segundo High School, located at 640 Main Street, and Richmond Street Elementary
School, located at 615 Richmond Street. El Segundo High School serves approximately 1,270 students in grades 9 to 12. Richmond Street Elementary School serves approximately 588 students
in kindergarten to grade 5.
Public Facilities
Police and Fire Protection Services
C.1.The Civic Center Complex is located along the east side of Main Street between Holly Street on the north, Grand Avenue on the south, and Standard Street on the east. The complex
contains El Segundo City Hall, the Police Department and Fire Department Station No. 1 which are all within the Specific Plan area. City Hall is located at 350 Main Street within the
study area and adjacent to Downtown commercial and retail areas. The El Segundo Police Department is located at 348 Main Street and is responsible for providing general law enforcement
to the City and enforcing the local, state, and federal laws. The police department can accommodate a total of 82 sworn and non-sworn officers and related equipment. The station is
adequate to accommodate a projected city-wide build out population of approximately 17,300 residents. The department utilizes an Area Command Program for quality-of-life issues within
the City.The Emergency Operations Center (EOC) is located at 348 Main Street within the Police Department facility and is the hub for ensuring that the public are informed, prepared
and have the ability to recover from natural, technological, and/or acts of terrorism. Some of these hazards include fires, flooding, earthquakes, Tsunamis, hazardous waste and pipeline
spills and/or leaks, and general acts of terrorism.
Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Several private haulers provide solid waste collection service within the Specific Plan area and EDCO serves the residential component. As of January
1, 2022, State Law (SB 1383) went into effect requiring local collection agencies to reduce organic waste methane emissions which result from organic waste deposited at landfills. This
organic waste includes food waste, green waste, and paper products that decompose and release methane gas into the atmosphere. This bill requires a seventy-five percent reduction by
2025 city wide. As such, this waste is required to be deposited in the green containers in lieu of the gray containers. Although the landfill capacity is adequate to handle build out,
this reduction will then effectively reduce the waste that gets deposited into the landfill as a secondary outcome from the law and ordinance. It was determined that the proposed project
area will not require any physical changes or new/altered facilities to ensure adequate service to the project area, as detailed further in the Environmental Documentation. However,
the City through development projects or within public lots may consider the implementation of trash compacters.
CHAPTER 5Parks and Recreation The City’s Community Services Department, or Recreation and Parks, is located at 401 Sheldon Street which is outside the Specific Plan area. Although Recreation
and Parks are a part of the City’s core service, the actual staff is not located directly at City Hall. The Department contains three divisions: Administration, Recreation, and Library.
The Community Services Department operates and maintains parks and recreational facilities, the library, social programs, classes, special events and activities such as the El Segundo
Certified Farmers’ Market. Transportation opportunities, such as Dial-A-Ride and the Beach Shuttle are also administered by the Department.The Specific Plan area does not contain any
parks, but there are two public parks located directly adjacent to the boundary and service the area: Library Park and Recreation Park. Library Park is a passive park located adjacent
to the public library north of the Project Area on Main Street at Mariposa Avenue and it contains a bandstand and shaded seating areas. Recreation Park is an active sports park located
on east of the Specific Plan area on Grand Avenue at Eucalyptus Drive, and it contains baseball fields and batting cages, pickleball courts, inline hockey rink, lawn bowling, horseshoe
pit, shuffleboard, playground, clubhouse, and a senior citizen center.Library The El Segundo Public Library is located at 111 W. Mariposa Avenue, just north of the Specific Plan boundary.
As with most public libraries, there is a Library Board of Trustees, a couple of advisory committees and a non-profit referred to as Friends of The Library. The library hosts multiple
community events throughout the year and provides public meeting rooms. The library offers a variety of services including a summer reading program and homework assistance programs.PUBLIC
REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
5-8
Implementation
6
6
6-1
IMPLEMENTATION
An overview of the ways the Specific Plan can attract economic investment and public improvements;A review of key existing economic conditions influencing current and future development
potentials in the Specific Plan area;A summary of the types of new development that are likely to be successful in the Specific Plan area;A description of various economic development
“tools” or implementation approaches available to the City of El Segundo to achieve the Plan A review of potential funding sources/mechanisms for implementation of key Plan initiatives.
objectives; and
CHAPTER 6: IMPLEMENTATIONA.Introduction This section outlines the implementation program for the Specific Plan. The implementation program includes the following components:•••••Note
that within this section there are a range of strategies and funding approaches that are universally applicable to many different communities. The way in which they are ultimately adapted
to El Segundo will be somewhat unique, however, which will depend on numerous specific conditions including for example available resources, the interrelationship of various programs,
preferences of the applicable stakeholder groups, and other considerations.The Specific Plan outlines programs to attract economic investment and public improvements
Zoning, design guidelines, etc. that are responsive to market needs at the individual-establishment level, while maintaining the overall character of the Specific Plan area that preserves
and enhances its general marketability;Information about the concepts, intent, etc. of the Specific Plan area to prospective investors/tenants;Streamlined permitting and entitlement
processes (i.e., minimizing the need for discretionary approval processes, environmental impact analysis, etc.);Area-wide infrastructure investments, including parking facilities and
street improvements;Area-wide “amenity” investments, including landscape and streetscape improvements; Marketing programs to enhance the area’s identity and recognition among consumers;
andClearinghouse roles (e.g., coordination of funding resources and dissemination of information related to investment in the Specific Plan area).Financially structuring shared infrastructure
improvements that increase the productivity of the area, in ways that are advantageous to development, such as shared parking; andInvesting in specific infrastructure improvements in
the Specific Plan area.
How the Specific Plan Can Attract Private Investment and Provide Public Benefits
include the following types of actions or policies:following types of initiatives:
By creating a “conducive development environment” that is consistent with prevailing market demand for various land uses. This may By providing focused development support to area
businesses, property owners, and key development projects. This can involve the
CHAPTER 6 1.An effective Specific Plan typically involves both the public and private sectors. Whereas development of the land uses envisioned for a plan area is often “kick started”
by various public sector initiatives, the ultimate goal of this type of planning effort is to attract desired private investment. Broadly speaking, there are two major ways that a municipality
can facilitate private development:A.B.Each of these potential implementation items is described in greater detail below (under Section B.4, Creating the Conditions for Attracting Private
Investment, and Section C, Potential Funding Sources). PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
6-2
6-3
IMPLEMENTATION
El Segundo in general and the Specific Plan area overall are advantaged by the following geographic and socioeconomic
.
Economic Conditions Influencing Development Potentials in the Specific Plan Area
Retail and office demand in El Segundo reflect the city’s unique status as a small residential community with a massive daytime employment Due to El Segundo’s extraordinary jobs/resident
ratio, the city supports far greater retail sales and has far more office space than would be El Segundo has an existing inventory of 17.8 million square feet of office space, representing
nearly 5% of all office space in Los Angeles
population. Whereas the city’s resident population in 2019 was approximately 16,800 persons, in 2019 there were an estimated 73,800 jobs in the city. These numbers equate to approximately
4.4 jobs per resident. In contrast, the jobs-per-resident ratios in the neighboring cities of Culver City, Hermosa Beach, and Manhattan Beach were 1.9, 0.4 and 0.6, respectively (and
the overall average for Los Angeles County was 0.5).typical for a residential community of its size. Taxable sales in El Segundo in 2019 were $36,500 per resident compared to the countywide
average of $12,000. Among the three comparison cities considered in this study, only Culver City had higher taxable sales per capita ($39,900); per capita taxable sales in Hermosa Beach
and Manhattan Beach in 2019 were $12,200 and $19,200, respectively.County. In contrast, the city’s population represents only 0.2% of the Los Angeles County total, which again underscores
El Segundo’s very strong market position for non-residential development. A key implication of this strong market position is that future retail and office development opportunities
in El Segundo will not specifically be constrained by resident population growth (which is expected to be minimal, according to the official SCAG forecast), but will be more broadly
supported by regional population increases and growth in the larger Westside/South Bay economy.
2.An effective Specific Plan needs to be based on a realistic understanding of the market conditions affecting the Specific Plan area. Simply changing zoning on a map will not attract
development unless there is an underlying market demand for a particular land use. On the other hand, if there is immediate demand for a desirable land use that is not permitted under
existing zoning, a change in zoning can bring about very significant results. Moreover, appropriate zoning changes can be made more effective if coupled with policies that address other
existing barriers to development (e.g., insufficient infrastructure). A summary of the major favorable and challenging conditions affecting development potentials in the Specific Plan
area is provided below.Advantageous Factors factors:•••
The city and Specific Plan area also face several notable challenges:
.
After gradually recovering from high-vacancy conditions during the Great Recession, the Los Angeles County office market has experienced The impact of the pandemic shutdown on the office
market continues to take shape, and the extent to which reduced demand for office Future housing demand in El Segundo (under the baseline and the aggressive scenarios considered in
this analysis) is expected to be in Competing downtown areas, such as Manhattan Beach’s, are currently higher-profile destinations for such activities as dining and nightlife, Although
the city’s massive daytime population of high-wage workers creates significant demand for retail and restaurant businesses, most The Specific Plan area is largely built out and most
parcels are developed with existing, economically viable uses. This typically creates a In areas where high land values challenge the financial feasibility of redevelopment (or new
development), the cost of providing adequate
significant new headwinds due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Countywide, these impacts have translated to lowered transaction volume, rising vacancy levels and slower rent growth (all of
which discourage development of new space).space will become a permanent condition (due to an increase in remote workers) is currently unclear. For planning purposes, the office market
demand analysis summarized below assumes a gradual return to “normal” conditions of projected employment growth translating to demand for new office space. However, a more permanent
“Work from Home” (WFH) workforce would clearly reduce the demand for new office space.the range of 500-750 units citywide over the next 20 years, representing growth of approximately
25-38 units per year. These projected levels of development would exceed recent historic growth rates (about 14 years per year between 2010 and 2020). In order to achieve these accelerated
levels of development, the City will need to expand zoning capacity for higher-density housing. In this regard, the likely constraints (from a community acceptance perspective) on significantly
increasing development densities (building heights) within the Specific Plana area place practical limits on the amounts of new residential that is likely to be built in the Downtown
over the next 20 years.with established market positions.of this demand is currently satisfied by commercial areas outside the Downtown (i.e., closer to where major office districts
are located). situation where any new development would need to be relatively high density in order for the ultimate value of the development to justify the costs associated with buying
and clearing land that is currently occupied with financially productive uses. While there may be some currently underutilized sites that are exceptions to this observation, it probably
applies as a good rule thumb for defining the types of opportunities that are likely to exist for most parcels.parking is often a “deal breaker” for infill development or redevelopment,
especially if structured parking is required.
CHAPTER 6 Challenging Factors•••••••PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
6-4
6-5
IMPLEMENTATION
Mixed-Use development will likely need to be relatively high density
For sites suitable for major new mixed-use development, projects Parking solutions for mixed-use (and for targeted new commercial The area could benefit from an expanded branding/marketing
effort The preceding points all suggest that the City is well served
will likely need to be relatively high density given prevailing land values.tenants such as restaurants) need to be as creative as possible, and these concepts are addressed elsewhere
in the Specific Plan.to achieve greater place recognition and effective leveraging of the area’s locational strengths (as noted above under “advantageous factors”).by a flexible approach
that anticipates the above issues and is responsive to the accompanying needs and market demands.
The above conditions suggest the following major conclusions about the types of opportunities that are likely to apply to existing or future development in the Specific Plan area:••••
Aggressive
El Segundo’s percentage share of regional demand will grow over time Aggressive forecasts reflect a continuation of El Segundo’s office absorption rates over past 10 yearsBaseline projections
increased by 50% to reflect potential expansion in zoning capacity
Baseline
Basis/ Key Assumptions for Demand Scenarios
Source: The Natelson Dale Group, Inc. (TNDG) and the City of El Segundo
El Segundo’s percentage share of regional (5-mile trade area) demand will remain constantBaseline forecasts reflect modest employment growth projected by SCAGMedical office demand is
assumed to be the same for baseline and aggressive scenarios (since it is assumed to be primarily a resident-serving land use, with limited potentials to capture regional demand)Citywide
forecast generally corresponds to City’s RHNA requirements
375
166,500
250,000
Aggressive
Plan Demand 200
(through 2040)
69,500
115,500
Baseline
Downtown Specific
1,045,000
Aggressive
500750
(through 2040)
160,000160,00024,00024,000
Baseline
Citywide Demand
Office
87,000770,0002,500,000
289,000465,000
General
Included in
Downtown
(2023)
6,67817
Current Existing
Office
General
Citywide
1,242,000
9,448,000
Included in
Summary of Development Demand Analysis
Table 6-1: Overview of Market Demand Projections (through 2040)
Land Use Retail/Restaurant (square feet)General Office (square feet)Medical Office (square feet)Multi-Family Residential (dwelling units)
3.As part of the background research for the Specific Plan update, The Natelson Dale Group, Inc. (TNDG) prepared a market study to identify long-range demand for various types of development
in the Specific Plan area. Key findings from the overall demand analysis are summarized in the table below for El Segundo and the Downtown Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan has
evaluated these potential land uses to create a more realistic analysis which is being evaluated by the EIR and falls within the baseline and aggressive demand for the Downtown Specific
Plan area.
CHAPTER 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
6-6
6-7
IMPLEMENTATION
A key advantage to adopting a Specific Plan is that it provides a vehicle for expedited approval
The structure of the Specific Plan helps maximize attractiveness of the area for development and other
.
From an economic perspective, two key issues need to be addressed as it relates to zoning within the Specific Plan area:
Creating the Conditions for Attracting Private Investment – City’s Role and Tools
values in the Specific Plan area.
Allowable densities need to be high enough to facilitate market-driven redevelopment of selected parcels given the relatively high land Zoning should allow the flexibility to develop
desirable land uses for which the future market is uncertain (e.g., office space).
4.Zoning.1.2.Streamlined permitting and entitlement.of development proposals that are consistent with the community vision established by the Plan. Developers consistently cite this
type of provision as a key factor in selecting the communities where they will pursue projects. In this regard, it is essential that the adopted plan remove to the maximum degree possible
the need for discretionary approvals for projects that fall within the development “envelope” established by the Plan. The program-level environmental impact report (EIR) being prepared
as part of this Specific Plan process will provide a significant incentive in this regard.Management of entitlements investment by aligning development potential and desired development
with “given” entitlements, thereby minimizing the need for property owners/developers to seek additional entitlements. At the same time, the Plan provides the regulatory framework and
design guidelines to additional entitlements also gives the area a marketing advantage. Any future adjustments to entitlement conditions can adhere to the spirit of keeping the development
process as streamlined as possible. Another aspect of managing entitlements is the matter of having a “finite allotment of the entitlements,” available for Specific Plan area properties,
which would accomplish three things: 1) Recognize practical limits in the demand for different land uses in the area, 2) Keep the development at a manageable level and type mix, and
3) Incentivize early (timely) redevelopment of individual sites. This concept may seem counterproductive with respect to the discussion above about the desirability of maximizing entitlements
in the area. However, the two notions can be complementary, as development timing is the critical factor.
For appropriate properties, the City could have programs in
The City could undertake, or support through partnership with appropriate entities, any or
The City could implement the marketing options discussed below, and other branding and information-compilation
As a starting point for future marketing initiatives for the Specific Plan area, the City could conduct a branding exercise or similar
Develop materials for and/or conduct workshops around the theme of, “why developing/occupying the Specific Plan area is good business.” Produce a high-quality newsletter devoted to the
area, issued on a regular schedule, that contains information of interest to both the Produce an annual report of development activity in the area, including development-related data
such as absorption, occupancy, mix of
Companion materials for living in the area could also be produced. Topics within these materials include: descriptions of how the area is value-planned, general and specific ways in
which the City functions as a key partner in developing the area, benefits potentially available to developers, businesses, etc. from sources in addition to the City, and advantages
to various uses from a market point of view.property owners, businesses, and residents, and to outsiders, including people who are not familiar with the area and may have an interest
in investing in it.business types, noteworthy development news, etc. The content and format of such a report can be modeled on those produced periodically by real estate brokerage firms.
This kind of information could also serve as one focus of compiling monitoring/evaluation information.
CHAPTER 6 Tools to encourage rehabilitation and creative reuse of commercial properties.place to encourage rehabilitation and creative use/reuse of commercial sites, such as dedicated
grant/loan programs using CDBG or other funds. Within the study area, existing commercial uses are frequently found located in small individual properties and/or spaces that may be
somewhat inefficient in terms of their relationship to the street and to parking, and their overall adaptability to various uses. However, these kinds of conditions also lend the area
a character that is somewhat unique within the overall trade area. These spaces can be attractive to creative entrepreneurs in all fields of endeavor. Marketing partnerships. activities,
in careful coordination with the El Segundo Chamber of Commerce, and any other appropriate development partners.Branding.process by which to designate the Specific Plan area with a
marketing-friendly name.Marketing and other information-compilation options.all of the following options:•••Marketing of the Specific Plan area could be accomplished in recognition
of the fact that Generation Y (Millennials) apparent preferences for higher density development will work in the area’s favor. (While these preferences have been noted under current
conditions, other investigations of Millennials have demonstrated that such preferences might not be long-term.)PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
6-8
6-9
IMPLEMENTATION
and major actions needed to develop the vision for Downtown El Segundo
The Implementation Action Plan provides a summary of the recommendations
As a member of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the City has access to the
Given the many options for coordinating marketing and related activities supporting implementation, the
Implementation
Assisting in locating and securing grant funding from federal and state agenciesProviding methodologies, tools and training programs to help members implement approved regional plansReceiving
priority responses on requests for data, publication or other planning supportRequesting the creation of customized maps for use on the City’s websiteAccess jurisdictional data analyses,
forecasting data and additional GIS resources.
Coordination with other organizations. City could review its overall position relative to economic development planning and marketing in order for this action to be optimized. Role of
SCAG with respect to El Segundo.following benefits outlined on the SCAG website:•••••Currently, SCAG provides links to the City’s main website as well as a ‘Local Profile’ for El Segundo,
which is dated May of 2019. The document provides an overview of demographic, employment, housing, transportation, retail sales, education, and other regional highlights. B. Action
Plan The vision and principles presented in the Downtown Specific Plan are supported by the following Implementation Action Plan. The Implementation Action Plan provides a summary of
Specific Plan recommendations and major actions needed for implementation. The table also identifies the responsible agency or party, suggested timing of the actions, and a list of
potential funding sources to assist in implementing each action to achieve the goals set forth within the El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan.
Department,
(Continued on next page)
Consultant,
Enforcement,
=
Finance
Code
=
Con
=
F
, CE
POTENTIAL
General Plan Maintenance FundAssessment District (e.g., PBID), General FundAssessment District (e.g., PBID), General Fund, CIPAssessment District (e.g., PBID), General Fund, CIPAssessment
District (e.g. PBID), General Fund, User Fees, Grants
Recreation & Parks
=
R
Works,
= Chamber of Commerce,
= Economic Dev. Corporation,
= Public
= Community Development
CD, ConCD, Chamber, EDCCD, PWCDCD, Chamber, EDC
CD ChamberEDCPW
11111
TIMINGRESPONSIBILITY
First Year,
= Two to Five Years, = Five Years
1 =23 4 = Ten Years
Prepare a wayfinding directional
(Chapter 2, Section G.4): Prepare
: Adoption of the Specific Plan and
: Provide shuttle service to local hotels and
Brand and market the Downtown to promote
Table 6-2: Implementation Action Plan PROGRAMS, STUDIES, AND INITIATIVES
EIR is the catalyst for Downtown El Segundo and the recommended land uses, development standards, and other proactive policies designed to spur economic investment and visual enhancement
of the area.image and attract investmentsign program including directional kiosks for the Downtown Specific Plan area. As part of the plan, include historic resources.conceptual design
package for the public plaza.employers to improve access to Downtown.
CHAPTER 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
6-10
6-11
Department,
Consultant,
Enforcement,
IMPLEMENTATION
=
Finance
Code
=
Con
=
F
, CE
POTENTIAL
General Fund General Fund General Fund
Recreation & Parks
=
R
Works,
= Chamber of Commerce,
= Economic Dev. Corporation,
= Public
= Community Development
CD, PWCD, ChamberCD, PW
CD ChamberEDCPW
111
TIMINGRESPONSIBILITY
First Year,
= Two to Five Years, = Five Years
1 =23 4 = Ten Years
(Continued)
: Review recommended parking strategies
: Prepare a Truck Route Study to investigate the
Prepare a Parklets Program for the long-term
Table 6-2: Implementation Action Plan
parking strategies for implementation. Evaluate effectiveness existing shared parking and in-lieu fee program and update.buildout of parklets and include the development of design criteria
for parklets which identifies solutions for providing cohesive design options for parklets that comply with the operational needs of the City and meet applicable building and fire codes.
purpose and use of the existing Truck Route on Main Street. Depending on the findings of the existing conditions analysis of that study, should relocation of the Truck Route be a desired
next step of analysis, the study should investigate the feasibility of that relocation.
(Continued on next page)
Department,
(Continued on next page)
Consultant,
Enforcement,
=
Finance
Code
=
Con
=
F
, CE
POTENTIAL
General Fund General Fund General FundGeneral FundGeneral FundGeneral FundGeneral Fund, Development Standards, Development Agreements
Recreation & Parks
=
R
Works,
= Chamber of Commerce,
= Economic Dev. Corporation,
= Public
= Community Development
CD, PWCD, PWCD, FCD, Chamber, EDCCD, FCD, FCD, F
CD ChamberEDCPW
1111111
TIMINGRESPONSIBILITY
First Year,
= Two to Five Years, = Five Years
1 =23 4 = Ten Years
: Perform a business
(Continued)
: Perform a traffic
(Continued)
: Establish ongoing interface with
: Pursue federal, state and regional funding sources for
: Update the Development Impact Fee (DIF) and Parking In-
Define targeted incentives for housing, retail/restaurant,
Consider the evaluation of a Property Owner / Business
Table 6-2: Implementation Action Plan
impact study to analyze the potential future long-term permanent closure of Main Street to vehicles from El Segundo Blvd to Mariposa Avenue.impact study to analyze the potential future
long-term permanent closure of Main Street to vehicles from El Segundo Blvd to Mariposa Avenue.Improvement Districtproperty and business owners to faciliate business retention/expansion
and to maximize support for assessment-based funding.infrastructure and planning.Lieu Fee schedules for the Specific Plan area.and mixed-use development (throughout Downtown with special
focus on key "catalyst" sites).
CHAPTER 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
6-12
6-13
Department,
Consultant,
Enforcement,
IMPLEMENTATION
=
Finance
Code
=
Con
=
F
, CE
POTENTIAL
Assessment District (e.g. PBID), General Fund, User FeesAssessment District (e.g. PBID), General Fund, User FeesAssessment District (e.g. PBID), General FundGeneral Fund, CIP, Development
Standards, Development Agreements, Assessment Disrict (e.g., PBID)General Fund, CIP, Development Standards, Development Agreements, Assessment District (e.g., PBID), CFD, Grants, CEQA
Mitigations
Recreation & Parks
=
R
Works,
= Chamber of Commerce,
= Economic Dev. Corporation,
= Public
= Community Development
CD ChamberEDCPW CD, Chamber, EDCCD, Chamber, EDCCD, Chamber, EDCPW, CDPW, CD
1
2222
TIMINGRESPONSIBILITY
First Year,
= Two to Five Years, = Five Years
1 =23 4 = Ten Years
(Continued)
Plan for and conduct
: Focus marketing outreach on recruitment of
: Program events to establish Downtown as the "cultural
Table 6-2: Implementation Action Plan
heart" of El Segundo; focus on attracting daytme office users to Downtown.occasional/periodic street closures along Main Street between El Segundo Blvd and Mariposa Avenue for events
or other activities . unique restaurants and small-scale retail in Downtown.coordinated with adjoining private development.development, and improvement plans as coordinated with adjoining
private development.
(Continued on next page)
Department,
Consultant, (Continued on next page)
Enforcement,
=
Finance
Code
=
Con
=
F
, CE
POTENTIAL
General Fund, CIP, Development Standards, Development Agreements, Assessment District (e.g., PBID), CFD, Grants, CEQA MitigationsGeneral Fund, CIP, Development Standards, Development
Agreements, Assessment District (e.g., PBID), CFD, Grants, CEQA MitigationsGeneral Fund, CIP, Development Standards, Development Agreements, Assessment District (e.g., PBID), CFD, GrantsGeneral
Fund, CIP, Development Standards, Development Agreements, Assessment District (e.g., PBID), CFD, Grants
Recreation & Parks
=
R
Works,
= Chamber of Commerce,
= Economic Dev. Corporation,
= Public
= Community Development
PW, CDPW, CDPW, CD, ChamberPW, CD
CD ChamberEDCPW
2222
TIMINGRESPONSIBILITY
First Year,
= Two to Five Years, = Five Years
1 =23 4 = Ten Years
(Chapter 4, Section C):
(Continued)
Table 6-2: Implementation Action Plan
development, and improvement plans as coordinated with adjoining private development.design development, and improvement plans as coordinated with adjoining private development.Streetscape
furnishings, decorative paving, pedestrian lighting, street banners, landscaping, and irrigation improvements.development, and improvement plans as coordinated with adjoining private
development.
CHAPTER 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
6-14
6-15
IMPLEMENTATION
Department,
Consultant,
Enforcement,
=
Finance
Code
=
Con
=
F
, CE
POTENTIAL
General Fund, CIP, Development Standards, Development Agreements, Assessment District (e.g., PBID), CFD, GrantsGeneral Fund, CIP, Development Standards, Development Agreements, Assessment
District (e.g., PBID), CFD, GrantsImpact/In-Lieu Fees, CFD, User FeesImpact/In-Lieu Fees, CFD, User FeesGeneral Fund, CIP, Development Standards, Development Agreements, Assessment
District (e.g., PBID), CFD, GrantsGeneral Fund, CIP, Development Standards, Development Agreements, Assessment District (e.g., PBID), CFD, Grants
Recreation & Parks
=
R
Works,
= Chamber of Commerce,
= Economic Dev. Corporation,
= Public
= Community Development
CD ChamberEDCPW PW, CDPW, CDPW, CD, FPW, CD, FPW, CDPW, CD
22
4
TIMINGRESPONSIBILITY
First Year,
= Two to Five Years, = Five Years
1 =23 4 = Ten Years
(Continued)
(Chapter 2, Section G.4):
Table 6-2: Implementation Action Plan
development, and improvement plans as coordinated with adjoining private development.and selected improvement plans.design development, and improvement plans as coordinated with adjoining
private development.Survey, design development, and improvement plans as coordinated with adjoining private development.Survey, design development, and improvement plans as coordinated
with adjoining private development.Survey, design development, and selected improvement plans.
The Downtown’s existing parking and infrastructure deficiencies are shared among all property
As appropriate, implementation solutions should focus on resolving existing Downtown-wide
While major, long-term infrastructure projects can occur in later phases of the Specific Plan implementation,
Potential Funding Mechanisms
Equitable distribution of costs and benefits:Allow for incremental solutions:Reduce dependency on future development:
owners and businesses, and are not attributable only to future development projects. As a result, funding for resolving existing deficiencies should be shared among all property owners
and/or businesses in the district – except in cases where there is a clear nexus between an individual development project and needed public facilities.the action plan prioritizes high-impact
approaches to infrastructure improvements that can be introduced in the short term.deficiencies regardless of future development activity.
CHAPTER 6 C.A series of financing tools potentially available to the City, from federal, state, and organizational sources, and from mechanisms that the City could implement, are described
below. While the ideal set of solutions and implementation and funding mechanisms to achieve the Downtown Specific Plan’s goals will evolve over time, a consistent set of criteria
for selecting these mechanisms is established as follows:•••It is envisioned that many future improvements planned for the Downtown area will be achieved through development by the
private sector, including meeting development standards, paying existing and possible future fees, and through other funding mechanisms that could apply to all future development. Guided
by the development standards and guidelines included in this Specific Plan, these development projects can each incrementally contribute to establishing a high-quality place whose value
will be much greater than it would be without these coordinated efforts.It is also incumbent on the City to pursue an array of funding sources and financing mechanisms to implement
some of the larger public improvements included in this Specific Plan. These mechanisms are complex and are tied to many factors outside the control of the City of El Segundo, including
market and economic cycles, State and Federal grant funding availability, State enabling legislation, etc. This precludes the ability to immediately establish a detailed timeline for
building every identified improvement. Therefore, this implementation strategy focuses on identifying the range of potential mechanisms available for delivering the major improvements
necessary to realize the core elements of the Specific Plan’s vision. The strategy prioritizes an initial set of investments and programmatic activities that will set the stage for
long-term implementation. This implementation strategy should be revisited on a regular basis to ensure that the Plan’s desired outcomes are being achieved.PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember
2023
6-16
6-17
IMPLEMENTATION
General FundCapital Improvement ProgramUser FeesFederal StateRegional (e.g., Metro)Development StandardsCEQA MitigationsImpact/In-Lieu FeesNegotiated Agreements Assessment District (including
LLD, Community Facilities District
PBID and CBD)
EXAMPLES••••••••••••
General Fund revenues include property tax, sales
Table 6-3: Funding Source Categories and Examples
CATEGORY City ResourcesOutside GrantsDeveloper ContributionsDistrict-Based Tools
City Resources General Fund:tax, transient occupancy tax, and other revenues that are primarily used to pay for ongoing municipal services and operations. Both the General Fund and the
Capital Improvement Program are critical funding sources for the Downtown Specific Plan’s near-term physical improvements and initial programmatic investments. In the absence of new
district-based funding resources, the General Fund will also need to support ongoing programs that require City staff time, such as the recommended branding/marketing effort.
Categories of Physical Improvements Funding Sources and Application to
Regulatory actions;Programs, studies and initiatives; and Improvement projects.
1.and Programs Requiring Funding Implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan requires completing a number of physical improvement projects and initiating several ongoing programs. For
purposes of understanding how funding sources and tools align with these initiatives, the recommended projects and programs are grouped in three major categories:•••2.Specific Plan
Improvements and Programs This section provides a menu of potential funding sources for implementing capital improvements and programmatic activities to realize the Downtown Specific
Plan vision. In many cases, multiple funding sources must be combined to pay for projects. Therefore, each source’s description includes considerations for deploying the source in the
specific context of Downtown El Segundo.Although the terms “funding” and “financing” are often used interchangeably, there is an important distinction between the two terms. “Funding”
typically refers to a revenue source such as a tax, fee, or grant that is used to pay for an improvement. Some funding sources, such as impact fees, are one-time payments, while others,
such as assessments, are ongoing payments. “Financing” involves borrowing against future revenues by issuing bonds or other debt instruments that are paid back over time through taxes
or fee payments, enabling agencies to pay for infrastructure before the revenue to cover the full cost of the infrastructure is available.
Each new development project will
Impact and in-lieu fees are one-time fees
The environmental review process requires the
Developer Contributions Development Standards:contribute to the Downtown Specific Plan’s implementation by meeting requirements regulating each project’s land uses, height, density,
bulk, parking requirements, on- site circulation, on-site open space, street frontage improvements, and other features consistent with the overall improvement plan for Downtown. New
development projects can also be required to reimburse the City for the cost of developing and administering the Downtown Specific Plan itself. These standards are adopted in the City’s
zoning ordinance and must be satisfied in order for a project to be granted approval.CEQA Mitigations:analysis of a project’s environmental impacts and the identification of measures
to reduce or eliminate these impacts. As a requirement of approval, developers may be required to undertake a number of mitigation measures, such as off-site traffic mitigation as defined
by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).Impact/In-Lieu Fees:imposed on new developments to pay for improvements and facilities that either serve the new development or reduce
the impacts of the project on the community. Fee revenues cannot be used to fund existing deficiencies in infrastructure. In-lieu fees are payments made instead of meeting an on-site
development requirement (such as paying a fee in-lieu of providing on-site parking spaces), while impact fees are required unless the impact is addressed in some other way (if allowed).
Infrastructure projects
Because grant programs are typically
.
User fees and rates include the fees charged for the use
CHAPTER 6 Capital Improvement Program (CIP): identified in the Downtown Specific Plan—including the major capital improvement projects—are candidates for inclusion in the City’s Capital
Improvement Program, which is updated annually and includes a projection of five years of future infrastructure projects.User Fees:of public infrastructure or services. It may be possible
to use some portion of user fee or rate revenue toward financing the costs of new infrastructure (e.g., parking structures) and/or services (e.g., shuttle transportation or fee-based
special events). Outside Grants Various Federal, State, and regional grant programs distribute funding for public improvements competitive, grant funds are an unpredictable funding
source, and the City of El Segundo must remain proactive in applying for grants to implement the Downtown Specific Plan. Downtown projects focused on pedestrian and bicycle improvements
may be especially competitive for grant funding since these projects contribute to achieving the goals of the regional Sustainable Communities Strategy. For example, the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG) provides competitive grant funding under the Active Transportation Program for infrastructure improvements such as bicycle lanes and pedestrian improvements.PUBLIC
REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
6-18
6-19
would provide
IMPLEMENTATION
may be particularly relevant for use
The property-based improvement district (PBID) and/or business improvement district (BID)in the Downtown. With ongoing funding by property owners and/or business owners, a PBID or BID
would provide an ongoing stream of revenue for promoting the district, contributing to lower-cost physical improvements, and managing any ongoing programs. This revenue source is generally
insufficient to fund major capital improvements, but the limited assessment and the local control of revenues are likely to appeal to property owners and businesses within the district.A
Mello-Roos community facilities district (CFD) a flexible and substantial revenue source against which it is possible to issue bonds for major capital improvements. Revenues can also
be used to fund ongoing operation and maintenance expenses. However, passage of a CFD in the Downtown is likely to be challenging until property owners reach consensus around shared
infrastructure needs and a willingness to contribute significant monetary resources toward addressing those needs.
Negotiated community benefits are developer
The cost and basis of impact fees and in-lieu fees must be directly related to the impacts being mitigated or requirement being met, respectively. As part of the initial process of implementing
the Downtown Specific Plan, the City should undertake a review and update the Development Impact Fee and Parking In-lieu Fee schedules relevant to the Downtown. Negotiated Agreements:contributions
that exceed the baseline features required through development standards, environmental mitigation measures, and impact fees. These agreements are typically negotiated for large development
projects, often either as a codified condition of approval for projects meeting certain conditions, or in exchange for variances from existing land use regulations. Given the scarcity
of large future development sites in the Downtown, negotiated agreements are unlikely to be a major funding source; however, they may be useful and a case-by-case basis to supplement
other funding sources.District-Based Tools Land-based financing tools are typically associated with new real estate development to generate benefit-based special assessment revenues
or property tax revenues to finance improvements through bond repayment or paying for improvements over time. District- based tools provide a stable revenue stream while ensuring that
properties benefiting from improvements also contribute to those public investments. The following table describes the three primary types of district-based funding and financing tools.
Note that assessment districts and community facilities districts primarily capture additional funding from private entities.
Requires majority vote of paying stakeholders.Increases costs and risk for paying stakeholders; stakeholders Impacts paying stakeholders’ overall ability to support other Little financial
risk to the City or public agencies; could lead to Additional City staff time to administer districts could offset Requires approval of 2/3 of property owners Boundaries can include
noncontiguous parcels.Fees can be proportionally subdivided and passed on to future Increases costs and risk for landowners and homeowners if Impacts paying stakeholders’ overall ability
to support other
need to perceive a clear benefit for themselves.taxes, fees, and community benefits.increased tax revenue based on private reinvestment.some gains.property owners.fees dissuade buyers
or reduce achievable sales prices.taxes, fees, and community benefits.
CONSIDERATIONS••••••••••
USES Most useful for funding ongoing operations and maintenance.Infrastructure improvements, development of public facilities, ongoing operations and maintenance.
DESCRIPTION Additional assessment against a range of participants, depending on the type of district and relative benefit received.Examples include: Landscaping and Lighting District,
Community Benefit District, Business Improvement District, Property- Based Business Improvement DistrictAdditional assessment on property, levied and varied based on a selected property
characteristic (excluding property value).
Table 6-4: Summary of Major District-Based Value Capture Tools
FUNDING TOOL Special Assessment DistrictsCommunity Facilities District (Mello-Roos)
CHAPTER 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
6-20
6-21
and Federal Grants
X
Other Regional, State
Outside
Sources
User Fees
XX
IMPLEMENTATION
Program Funds
Capital Improvment
City
Resources
General Fund
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
CFD
(LLD, PBID, CBD)
XXXX
Assessment District
Mechanisms
District-Based
Agreements
Negotiated & Voluntary
Impact / In-Lieu Fees
Project Impacts
CEQA Mitigations of
Developer
Contributions
Development Standards
Table 6-5: Applicable Funding Sources REGULATORY ACTIONSPROGRAMS, STUDIES, AND INITIATIVES
(Continued on next page)
and Federal Grants
XXXX
Other Regional, State
Outside
Sources
User Fees
X
(Continued on next page)
Program Funds
Capital Improvment
City
Resources
General Fund
XXXXXXXX
X
CFD
(LLD, PBID, CBD)
XXX
Assessment District
Mechanisms
District-Based
Agreements
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Negotiated & Voluntary
Impact / In-Lieu Fees
Project Impacts
CEQA Mitigations of
Developer
Contributions
Development Standards
XXXXXXXXX
(Continued)
Table 6-5: Applicable Funding Sources IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
CHAPTER 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
6-22
6-23
and Federal Grants
XXXXX
Other Regional, State
Outside
Sources
User Fees
XX
IMPLEMENTATION
Program Funds
Capital Improvment
City
Resources
General Fund
CFD
XX
(LLD, PBID, CBD)
Assessment District
Mechanisms
District-Based
Agreements
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Negotiated & Voluntary
Impact / In-Lieu Fees
XX
Project Impacts
CEQA Mitigations of
Developer
Contributions
Development Standards
XXXXX
(Continued)
Table 6-5: Applicable Funding Sources
Description
Continues the Transportation Alternatives set-aside from the Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) program. Eligible uses of the set-aside funds include all projects and activities
that were previously eligible under the Transportation Alternatives Program under the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). This encompasses a variety of smaller-scale
transportation projects such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities, recreational trails, safe routes to school projects, community improvements such as historic preservation and vegetation
management, and environmental mitigation related to stormwater and habitat connectivity.Program funds will be made available each fiscal year for Community Grants, to install electric
vehicle charging and alternative fuel in locations on public roads, schools, parks, and in publicly accessible parking facilities.The ATP consolidates existing federal and state transportation
programs, including the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA), and State Safe Routes to School (SRTS), into a single program with a focus to
make California a national leader in active transportation. The program provides a total of about $220 million each year for bike and pedestrian projects across California. The program
allows cities, counties, transit agencies and other public agencies to compete for grants to build bicycle/pedestrian paths, install bike racks and pay for other projects or programs
that make walking or biking easier, safer and more convenient.Projects that beautify and improve local streets and roads, tribal lands, parks, pathways, and transit centers to clean
and enhance public spaces.
USDOTUSDOT
Source
Agency/ Caltrans
StateStateCaltrans
FederalFederal
Category
Transportation Alternatives (TA) FundingCharging and Fuel Infrastructure GrantsActive Transportation ProgramClean California Local Grant Program
Program
CHAPTER 6(Continued on next page)PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
The following table includes examples of grant funding sources that are potentially applicable to the Downtown Specific Plan Area.
6-24
6-25
IMPLEMENTATION
Description
Funding for Capital Improvement Projects that are necessary to facilitate the development of housing. Eligible improvements include utility service improvements, streets, roads, parking
structures, transit linkages, transit shelters, traffic mitigation features, site preparation or demolition, sidewalks, and streetscape improvements.LA County voters approved Measure
M with 71.15% support in 2016. The no sunset half-cent sales tax measure funds projects to ease traffic, repair local streets and sidewalks, expand public transportation, earthquake
retrofit bridges and subsidize transit fares for students, seniors and persons with disabilities.A two-thirds majority of LA County voters approved the Measure R half-cent sales tax
in 2008 to finance new transportation projects and programs, and accelerate those already in the pipeline. The Measure R Expenditure Plan devotes its funds to seven transportation categories:
35% to new rail and bus rapid transit projects; 3% to Metrolink projects; 2% to Metro Rail system improvement projects; 20% to carpool lanes, highways and other highway related improvements;
5% to rail operations; 20% to bus operations; and 15% for Local Return programs.Proposition C was approved by Los Angeles County voters in November 1990, generating with a half-cent
sales tax. Proposition C was intended to support projects and programs developed with Proposition A funds and, in particular, was to provide funding to help improve and expand the
rail system started with Proposition A funds. The Proposition C expenditure plan is as follows: 20% Local Return programs; 5% rail and bus security; 10% commuter rail, transit centers
and park & ride; 25% transit-related highway improvements; and 40% discretionary.
(Continued)
HCD
MetroMetroMetro
Source
Agency/
State
RegionalRegionalRegional
Category
Local/ Local/ Local/
Infrastructure
InfillGrant Catalytic ProgramMeasure MMeasure RProposition C
Program
(Continued on next page)
Description
Approved by voters in November 1980, Proposition A is a half-cent sales tax dedicated to transportation funding and was the first of its kind to address transportation challenges in
LA County. Proposition A has funded transportation projects, improved bus service, initiated plans for a rail system that continues to be expanded today and helped subsidize fares.
The Proposition A expenditure plan includes 3 categories: 25% to Local Return Programs, 35% to rail development and 40% to discretionary.The AB 2766 Subvention Program is a funding
source for cities and counties to encourage the development of measures or projects that result in the reduction of motor vehicle emissions.Sustainable Transportation Planning Grants
funds local and regional multimodal transportation and land use planning projects, transportation planning studies partnering with Caltrans, and multimodal planning studies partnering
with Caltrans that further the region’s RTP SCS (where applicable), contribute to the State’s GHG reduction targets, and assist in achieving the Caltrans Mission and Grant Program Objectives.
(Continued)
AQMD
Metro
Source
Agency/
Caltrans
SCAG/
RegionalRegionalRegional
Category
Local/ Local/ Local/
Proposition AAB 2766 Motor Vehicle Subvention ProgramSustainable Transportation Planning Grants
Program
CHAPTER 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
6-26
Administration
7
7
7-1
ADMINISTRATION
View of the City Hall Complex at Main Street looking towards Grand Avenue
CHAPTER 7: ADMINISTRATIONA.Introduction This chapter describes the authority of the Specific Plan, the administrative procedures required for amendments and/or modifications to the Specific
Plan, Specific Plan administration, and design review process.
Authority and AdoptionSpecific Plan Amendments
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
CHAPTER 7
Amendment Approval
B.California Government Code Sections 65450 through 65457 provide the necessary authorization for the City of El Segundo to prepare and adopt this Specific Plan. Hearings are required
by both the Planning Commission and City Council, after which the Specific Plan can be adopted by the City Council either by resolution (as policy) or by ordinance (as regulation).
This document has been adopted by ordinance by the City Council as a regulation through a public hearing process. The Downtown Specific Plan is a regulatory plan which will serve as
zoning law for properties within the boundaries of the Plan. All proposed development plans or agreements, tentative or parcel maps, and any other development approvals must be consistent
with this Specific Plan and with the General Plan.The Downtown Specific Plan supersedes other regulations and ordinances of the City for the control of land use and development within
the Specific Plan boundaries. Where the Specific Plan is silent on a topic, the El Segundo Municipal Code requirements remain in effect. C.The Specific Plan may need to be revised over
time to accommodate modifications in response to the community’s needs or changing economic conditions. California Government Code Section 65453 states that a specific plan “may be
amended as often as deemed necessary by the legislative body.” Amendments to the Specific Plan may be proposed as long as the proposed amendments are compatible and consistent with
the purpose and goals of the Specific Plan and the El Segundo General Plan. Specific Plan amendments shall be processed in accordance with Government Code sections 65453-65454 and ESMC
Chapter 15-27. 1.Minor Amendments The Director of Community Development may make minor text and exhibit modifications that are clerical in nature with no substantive impact/change.
Development Standard adjustments and administrative determinations do not require an amendment to the Specific Plan.Appeals Appeals of decisions by the Director of Community Development
shall be processed in accordance with Chapter 15-29 (Appeals) of the ESMC.7-2
7-3
ADMINISTRATION
Specific Plan Administration
Administration ProcessAllowable Land Uses
D.1.Interpretation The Director of Community Development is assigned the responsibility and authority to interpret the Specific Plan. Whenever the Director of Community Development makes
an official interpretation of this Specific Plan, the interpretation shall be made in writing explaining the interpretation and the general circumstances surrounding the need for the
interpretation. Any interpretation by the Director of Community Development may be appealed. The Director of Community Development may refer interpretation of the Specific Plan to the
Planning Commission for a decision at a public meeting.2.Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Specific Plan, or any future amendments
or additions hereto, is for any reason found to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remainder of this Specific Plan document or any future amendments or additions hereto. The City hereby declares that it would have adopted these requirements and each sentence,
subsection, clause, phrase or portion or any future amendments or additions thereto, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, clauses, phrases, portions or
any future amendments or additions thereto may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.3.All development applications within the Specific Plan area shall follow established City procedures
such as those for zone variances, conditional use permits, development permits and subdivisions. All development applications within the Specific Plan area will be evaluated for compliance
with Specific Plan regulations and guidelines. Appeals are regulated pursuant to compliance with Chapter 15-29 (Appeals) of the ESMC.4.Allowable land uses are identified in Chapter
2, Private Realm – Land Use and Development Standards and are listed for each Specific Plan District. A land use that is not listed in the Permitted Use Table is not allowed except
where the Director of Community Development may find that a use may be permitted due to its consistency with the purpose/intent of the zoning district and similarity to other uses listed
in compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-22 (Administrative Determinations). In addition, General Office, Medical-Dental Office, and other pedestrian-friendly uses may be allowed in the Main
Street and Richmond Street Districts as primary street ground floor uses subject to review and approval of an Administrative Use Permit (ESMC Chapter 15-23). Such uses must increase
foot traffic and/or otherwise improve the pedestrian environment and may be subject to conditions of approval requiring a retail component, outdoor displays or seating, installation
of public art, etc.
Authority to Promulgate Rules and Administrative Discretionary Demolition
10.Regulations The Director of Community Development has the authority to promulgate rules and regulations, and to amend or add to them, for the implementation of this chapter. 11.Permits
The demolition of structures on properties identified individually as potential historic resources or contributing to a potential historic district requires review and approval of
an Administrative Discretionary Demolition Permit. This permit is subject to the review process in ESMC Chapter 15-23 and the following finding:Before an Administrative Discretionary
Demolition Permit may issue, the decision making authority must find that demolition of the subject structure(s) will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
historical resource.
NonconformityAdministrative Determinations Development Standards AdjustmentsAuthority to Inspect
5.Chapter 15-21 (Nonconforming Buildings and Uses) of the ESMC shall be used for any nonconforming uses, structures or parcels within the Specific Plan area. Land uses and structures
existing as of the adoption date of this Specific Plan may continue to remain in accordance with the ESMC (Chapter 15-21).6.Administrative Determinations must comply with Chapter 15-22
of the El Segundo Municipal Code (ESMC). 7.The Director of Community Development may grant adjustments related to development and design standards, provided any administrative relief
does not exceed fifteen percent of any development or design standard, or any development or design standard consistent with ESMC Chapter 15-22, whichever is greater. 8.Inspections
must comply with ESMC Chapter 15-30. 9.Penalty Penalties must comply with ESMC Chapter 15-30. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
CHAPTER 7
7-4
7-5
ADMINISTRATION
. Director of Community Development, or his/
Administrative-level review applies to the
Substantial exterior alterations. These include installation, replacement, modifications to multiple types of architectural building features, including, without limitation, windows,
doors, awnings, lighting, siding material and colors, landscaping, and signs as determined by the Director of Community Development,or his/her designee. Changes to the size or location
of building openings, such as windows and doors. Outdoor retail uses and outdoor dining (including temporary dining). An addition to a building that is up to a maximum of eight hundred
(800) square feet (gross) in size.
Administrative-level review requires submittal of a Downtown Design Review (DDR) application to the Community Development Department. Applicability.following development projects:
Review Authority her designee. The Director’s decisions shall be in compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-23.
Administrative
b.
. Community Development Department staff.
. Ministerial review applies to all projects that are
Installation, replacement, or modifications to individual architectural building features, including, without limitation, windows, doors, awnings, lighting, siding material and colors,
landscaping, and signs.
Design Review Process
Ministerial review occurs during the building permit process. No discretionary permit and/or planning applications are required. Ministerial review is limited to ensuring compliance
with objective development and design standards in Chapter 2 of this Specific Plan. Applicability not subject to Administrative or Planning Commission review and include, without
limitation, the following development projects: Review Authority
Levels of Review and Process
Ministerial
E.1.Purpose The purpose of the design review process is to ensure that new development in the Downtown Specific Plan area complies with the standards contained in Chapter 2, Private
Realm – Land Use and Development Standards of the Specific Plan. 2.The following levels of review apply to development projects in the Downtown Specific Plan area: a.
.
. Planning Commission. A public hearing and
. Planning Commission-level review applies to the
New buildings. An addition to a building that is over eight hundred (800) square feet (gross) in size. Substantial exterior alterations or other development projects referred to the
Planning Commission by the Director of Community Development
The project design is consistent with the goals, policies, and The project design substantially complies with the
objectives of the General Plan and the Specific Plan.development standards and guidelines in Chapter 2 of the Specific Plan.
Planning Commission-level review requires submittal of a Downtown Design Review (DDR) application to the Community Development Department. Applicability following development projects:Review
Authority notification is required before the Planning Commission issues a decision. The public hearing and notice must comply with ESMC Chapter 15-28. A decision of the Planning
Commission may be appealed to the City Council pursuant to ESMC Chapter 15-29. Administrative and Planning Commission Design Review applications must meet the following findings:
••
Planning Commission
c.d.Findings
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
CHAPTER 7
The design review process will ensure the Downtown vision is implemented
7-6
7-7
Resolution
Director Letter
Building Permit
Planning Commission
Decision Method
ADMINISTRATION
No public hearingNo public hearing
Public hearing required
Hearing Required
DDR application required/ DDR application required/
Application/ Public
No separate DDR application/
Planning
Director of
Commission
Department staff
or his/ her designee
Review Authority
Community Development
Community Development,
Applicability/ Thresholds
* All projects that are not subject to Administrative or Planning Commission review. These include, without limitation, the following: Installation, replacement, or modifications to
individual architectural building features, including, without limitation, windows, doors, awnings, lighting, siding material and colors, landscaping, and signs.* Substantial exterior
alterations. These include installation, replacement, or modifications to multiple architectural building features, including, without limitation, windows, doors, awnings, lighting,
siding material and colors, landscaping, and signs as determined by the Director of Community Development, or his/ her designee. * Changes to the size or location of building openings,
such as windows and doors. * Outdoor retail uses and outdoor dining (including temporary dining). * Additions to buildings up to a maximum of eight hundred (800) square feet (gross).
* New buildings * Additions to buildings over eight hundred (800) square feet (gross) * Substantial exterior alterations or other development projects referred to the Planning Commission
by the Director of Community Development, or his/ her designee.
MinisterialAdministrativePlanning Commission
Table 7-1: Downtown Design Review (DDR) Process
Review
Level
Environmental Review
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
CHAPTER 7
F.A program-level Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Specific Plan. A Program EIR may reduce the need for project-specific environmental review in areas that have
been analyzed by the EIR, subject to findings that there are no significant changes in conditions and that the project is in compliance with the Specific Plan requirements. Certain
projects may require additional specific environmental review as necessary. This could include targeted studies on one or more identified environmental concerns. The City will make
these determinations, and environmental review may be incorporated in the development approval process.
7-8
Appendix
A
A
A-1
APPENDIX A
The Downtown Specific Plan will provide for an
contributes to El Segundo’s commercial options
economically viable and stable Downtown that uniquely
To preserve and improve the business
Augment the Downtown area’s atmosphere and accessibility by
Encourage revitalization efforts that improve the appearance of
: Preserving the Downtown area’s economic viability should be a : Encourage a mix of retail and commercial businesses that
: Strive to present a clear and consistent image of what the
To create an economically viable and stable Downtown area that
Policy ED3-1.1 Downtown area is and how it can serve El Segundo’s residential and business communities. Policy ED3-1.2 priority. Policy ED3-1.3:Downtown area businesses. Policy ED3-1.4:addressing
vehicle circulation, parking, and streetscape issues. Policy ED3-1.5 stimulate pedestrian traffic and meet the communities changing needs for goods and services.
Economic Development Element
Objective ED3-1:
uniquely contributes to El Segundo’s commercial options.
APPENDIX A: Relationship to the General PlanA.Introduction The Downtown Specific Plan is consistent with its General Plan Land Use Designation. In addition, the Specific Plan directly
implements or furthers the intent of the following General Plan goals, objectives, and policies. 1.Goal ED3: Downtown Business Environment. environment and image of Downtown El Segundo.
•The Downtown Specific Plan is consistent with the above noted Economic Development Goal, Objectives, and Policies of the General Plan. The Plan strives to preserve and improve the
business environment, stabilize the economic viability of the Downtown, improve the appearance of Downtown, improve vehicular circulation, parking and streetscape and enhance the pedestrian
environment while providing the opportunity for a mix of commercial services.
Maintain El Segundo’s “small town” atmosphere and provide an attractive
Encourage active and continuous citizen participation in all phases of the planning program and activities.
Innovative land development and design techniques as well as new materials and construction methods should be
Require all projects to adhere to the processing and review requirements found in the City Zoning Ordinance and the
: Adopt action programs which will provide for planting of trees in all the City streets, landscaping of median strips in
: Adopt a comprehensive sign ordinance which will regulate the quantity, quality and location of signs.
: Preserve existing street trees and encourage new ones consistent with the City Street Tree Program.
: Develop an active program to beautify the major entrances to the City. Landscaping and an attractive monument with : Develop standards to address the potential impacts of drive-thru
restaurants on residential uses.
Preserve and maintain the City’s Downtown and historic areas as integral to the City’s appearance and function.
Recognize the City as a comprehensive whole and create policies, design standards, and monumentation that will help
Policy LU 1-5.1:Policy LU1-5.2Policy LU1-5.3Policy LU1-5.4 major and secondary highways, improvement and beautification of parking lots, railroad rights-of-way, unsightly walls or fences
and vacant lots. Policy LU1·5.5 the City’s name and other design features would heighten the City’s identification. Policy LU1·5.6:guidelines for the implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Policy LU1-5.8:encouraged.Policy LU1·5.9
Land Use Element
Objective LU1-4:Objective LU1-5:
create a sense of place for the entire City.
APPENDIX A 2.Goal LU1: Maintenance of El Segundo’s “Small Town” Atmosphere. place to live and work.••The Downtown Specific Plan is consistent with the above detailed General Plan Land
Use Goal, Objectives and Policies in that one of the Plan’s goals is to maintain the “small town” atmosphere. The Plan also strives to complement the Downtown’s historic context, create
a sense of place, provide for citizen input through the public workshop and community outreach, Planning Commission and City Council public hearings, encourage street trees, landscaping,
and entry statements, and provide appropriate CEQA review.PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
A-2
A-3
APPENDIX A
. Preserve and enhance the City’s cultural heritage
The City shall investigate methods for preserving historical buildings, including overlay zoning districts,
:
: The City shall conduct a thorough survey of all buildings of cultural, historical, or architectural
Take an active role in documenting and preserving buildings of cultural, historical, and architectural significance.
New development adjacent to a building of cultural, historical, or architectural significance shall be designed with a
: Take an active role in assisting individual owners or groups in documenting and preserving buildings of potential
Encourage the preservation of historical and cultural sites and monuments.
Maintain the distinct character of the existing areas of the City.
Program LU2-2.1A significance within the City.Program LU2-2.1 B historical designations, and national register listings.
••
Policy LU2·1.1: consistent scale and similar use of materials.Policy LU2-2.1: This should include residential, non-residential, and publicly-owned buildings.Policy LU2-2.2 cultural,
historical, or architectural significance.
Objective LU2·1:Objective LU2-2:
Goal LU2: Preservation and Enhancement of El Segundo’s Cultural and Historic Resources and buildings or sites that are of cultural, historical, or architectural importance.••The Downtown
Specific Plan is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies which encourage preservation and enhancement of the Downtown’s cultural and historical resources, in that Chapters
2 and 4 of the Specific Plan propose goals and development standards to encourage the enhancement of the potential historical buildings in this area and guide compatible new development
and improvements. For example, Historic Resource requirements are specifically provided in Chapter 2.
Provide a stable tax base for the City through development
Develop an on-going program to analyze the peak hour parking needs of the Downtown area.
The City shall commit to maintaining and upgrading where necessary the public areas Downtown.
Limit number of “fast food” (lunchtime) restaurants in the Downtown area, to address parking concerns at peak
The Downtown area shall maintain and encourage low-scale architectural profile and pedestrian oriented features, Within one year after adoption of the General Plan, the City shall
initiate the development of a Downtown Traffic
Investigate development of shuttle service to provide public transportation access to Downtown, as well as future
The Downtown area will provide adequate parking, through both public and private efforts, to meet demand.
: Utilize public spaces for Downtown activities and special events.
: The City shall participate in Downtown revitalization efforts through a commitment of staff time and technical
: Revitalize and upgrade commercial areas, making them a part of a viable, attractive and people oriented commercial
Create an integrated, complimentary, attractive multi-use Downtown to serve as the focal point for the civic, business,
Program LU4-2.5A:
•
Policy LU4-2.1 district. Consideration should be given to aesthetic architectural improvements, zoning and shopper amenities. Policy LU4·2.2 assistance. Policy LU4-2.3Policy LU4-2.4:
Policy LU4·2.5:Policy LU4-2.6:consistent with existing structures. Policy LU4-2.7:commercial areas. Policy LU4·2.8: hours. Policy LU4-2.9:Mitigation Plan, designed to mitigate traffic
impacts associated with development at FAR 1.0.
Objective LU4·2:
educational, and social environment of the community.
APPENDIX A Goal LU4: Provision of a Stable Tax Base for El Segundo through Commercial Uses. of new commercial uses, primarily within a mixed-use environment, without adversely affecting
the viability of Downtown.•The Specific Plan provides the opportunity to enhance and further stabilize the existing Downtown tax base within a mixed-use environment. The Plan strives
to create Downtown as the focal point of the community, enhancing the aesthetic environment and upgrading public spaces for Downtown activities. The Specific Plan addresses provisions
for adequate parking, pedestrian-oriented architecture, and evaluation and mitigation of traffic impacts.PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
A-4
A-5
APPENDIX A
Provide the highest quality public facilities, services and public infrastructure possible to the
Develop, adopt, and implement a street lighting plan which provides a uniform and high quality of streetlights in all
Coordinate public improvements and beautification efforts with service groups, citizen groups, and organizations who
: All public facilities and utilities should be designed to enhance the appearance of the surrounding areas in which
Promote City appearance and cultural heritage programs.
Provide the highest and most efficient level of public services and public infrastructure financially possible.
Policy LU7·1.3: areas of the City.Policy LU7-2.1:are interested in upgrading the community.Policy LU7-2.5 they are located.
Circulation Element
Objective LU7·1:Objective LU7·2:
Goal LU7: Provision of Quality Infrastructure.community.••The Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan Goal, Objectives and Policies related to the provision of quality infrastructure
in that improved sidewalks, streets, street lighting, and other streetscape infrastructure improvements are proposed.3.
The Specific Plan area will include quality sidewalks, streets, street lighting, and other streetscape infrastructure improvements
The Specific Plan provides for a safe, convenient, and cost effective multimodal circulation system in the Downtown area
Provide a safe, convenient and cost-effective circulation
Develop and maintain a circulation system which shall include a functional hierarchy and classification system of
Provide adequate intersection capacity to the extent possible on Major, Secondary and Collector Arterials to prevent
Provide all residential, commercial and industrial areas with efficient and safe access for emergency vehicles.
Provide a circulation system consistent with current and future engineering standards to ensure the safety of the residents,
: Provide a roadway system that accommodates the City’s existing and projected land use and circulation needs.
Policy C1-1.7: diversion through traffic into local residential streets.Policy C1·1.8: Policy C1-2.1: arterial highways that will correlate capacity and service function to specific
road design and land use requirements.
Objective C1-1Objective C1-2:
workers and visitors of El Segundo.
APPENDIX A Goal C1: Provision for a Safe, Convenient and Cost Effective Circulation System.system to serve the present and future circulation needs of the El Segundo community.••The
Specific Plan is consistent with the Circulation Element Goal, Policies, and Objectives detailed above in that the circulation system in the Downtown area is safe, convenient, and cost
effective. The roadway improvement proposals for Main Street, Grand Avenue and Richmond Street have been evaluated and can accommodate the circulation needs, and the Specific Plan area
will continue to provide emergency vehicle access. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
A-6
A-7
APPENDIX A
. Provide a circulation system that incorporates alternatives to the single-occupant
Work closely with the Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD), the Los Angeles County Transportation
Ensure that transit planning is considered and integrated into all related elements of City planning.
Ensure that Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures are considered during the evaluation of new
Closely monitor design practices to ensure a clear pedestrian walking area by minimizing obstructions, especially in the
: Encourage new development to provide facilities for bicyclists to park and store their bicycles and provide shower and
: Encourage shopping areas to design their facilities for ease of pedestrian access. : Implement the recommendations on the Bicycle Master Plan contained in the Circulation Element,
as the availability
Ensure the use of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures throughout the City, where appropriate, to
Provide a bikeway system throughout the City to support and encourage the use of the bicycle as a safe and convenient Ensure the provision of a safe and efficient transit system that
will offer the residents, workers and visitors of El Segundo
Provide a pedestrian circulation system to support and encourage walking as a safe and convenient travel mode within the
Policy C2-1.6Policy C2-1.7:vicinity of intersections. Policy C2-2.1 arises; i.e., through development, private grants, signing of shared route. Policy C2-2.2 clothes changing facilities
at or close to the bicyclist’s work destination.Policy C2-3.1: Commission (LACTC), and the Rail Construction Corporation (RCC). Torrance Municipal Bus Lines, the El Segundo Employers
Association (ESEA) and private businesses to expand and improve the public transit service within the adjacent to the City.Policy C2-3.2:Policy C2-5.1:developments within the City,
including but not limited to ride-sharing, carpooling and vanpooling, flexible work schedules, telecommuting and car/vanpool preferential parking.
Objective C2-1:Objective C2-2:Objective C2-3:Objective C2-5:
City’s circulation system.travel mode within the City’s circulation system. a viable alternative to the automobile.discourage the single-occupant vehicle, particularly during the peak
hours. In addition, ensure that any developments that are approved based on TDM plans incorporate monitoring and enforcement of TDM targets as part of those plans.
Goal C2: Provision for Alternative Modes of Transportation vehicle, to create a balance among travel modes based on travel needs, costs, social values, user acceptance, and air quality
considerations.••••
. Develop a balanced General Plan, coordinating
Require submittal and implementation of a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) for all projects within the Urban
Identify and evaluate potential revenue sources for financing circulation system development and improvement
Require the provision of adequate pedestrian and bicycle access for new development projects through the
Ensure that the City’s parking codes and zoning ordinances are kept up-to-date.
Require all new development to mitigate project-related impacts on the existing and future circulation system such
Ensure that transit planning is considered and integrated into all related elements of City planning. Ensure the provision of sufficient on-site parking in all new development.
Establish the City’s short-term (5-year) Capital Improvement Program (CIP) consistent with the Circulation Element and the
Ensure that potential circulation system impacts are considered when the City’s decision makers and staff are evaluating
: Ensure the consideration of the impacts of land use decisions on the City’s parking situation.
Policy C3-1.1: that all Master Plan roadways are upgraded and maintained at acceptable levels of service through implementation of all applicable Circulation Element policies. Mitigation
measures shall be provided by or paid for by the project developer.Policy C3-1.5:Policy C3-1. 7: Mixed-Use area, and encourage a TMP for all projects within the northeast quadrant.Policy
C3-1.8: development review process.Policy C3-2.1:Policy C3-2.2:Policy C4-3.1: projects.
Objective C3·1:Objective C3-2Objective C4-3:
land use changes.entire General Plan, and ensure that the CIP incorporates adequate funding for the City’s circulation needs.
APPENDIX A One of the primary goals of the Downtown Specific Plan is to provide a pedestrian-oriented environment, which is consistent with the General Plan provisions for alternative
modes of transportation. The widened and enhanced sidewalks will further enhance pedestrian activity. The Specific Plan continues to provide bicycle and transit system access, consistent
with the General Plan, while encouraging more bicycle parking facilities.Goal C3: Development of Circulation Policies that are Consistent with other City Policies the Circulation Element
with all other Elements, ensuring that the City’s decision-making and planning activities are consistent among all City departments.•••PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
A-8
A-9
APPENDIX A
Provide regulations, as required by California Law, to facilitate additional housing and develop programs to serve special needs Provide for the construction of adequate housing in order
to meet the goals of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).
Facilitate the creation of affordable housing opportunities for extremely low, very low and low- income households.
Encourage investment of public and private resources to foster neighborhood improvement.
: Facilitate development on vacant and underdeveloped property designated as residential or mixed-use to accommodate a
Provide sufficient new, affordable housing opportunities in the city to meet the needs of groups with special requirements, including Provide opportunities for new housing construction
in a variety of locations and a variety of densities.
Preserve and protect the existing housing stock by encouraging the rehabilitation of deteriorating dwelling units and the conservation
Housing Element
Policy 1.2:Policy 2.1: Policy 2.2:Policy 3.1: Policy 3.3
groups (including persons with developmental disabilities). diversity of types, prices and tenure.
The Specific Plan addresses the Circulation Element Goal, Objectives, and Policies related to the development of circulation policies that are consistent with other City policies. This
section of the Specific Plan indicates the consistency of the Specific Plan with all the applicable Elements (Economic Development, Land Use, Circulation, Conservation, and Noise).
The Plan provides for the upgrading of streets to maintain the level of service, transit planning is addressed, pedestrian and bicycle access is enhanced, parking is managed, and potential
funding sources are identified.4.Goal 1: of the currently sound housing stock.•Goal 2: the needs of lower and moderate- income households. ••Goal 3: ••
Provide recreational programs and facilities for all segments of the community.
Protect natural open space resources and associated habitat.
. Preserve existing, and support acquisition of additional, private park and recreation facilities to foster
Promote street trees and landscaping as a desirable feature of the quality of life in El Segundo, by including in the Continue to support programs for the protection of the El Segundo
Blue Butterfly.
Require all new residential developments with more than 20 units to provide on-site recreational open space.
Encourage, through implementation of development incentives, the development of outdoor private recreational facilities,
: Encourage multi-family residential developments to provide active open space and recreation facilities which are maintained
Facilitate provision of infrastructure to accommodate residential development.
Facilitate timely development processing for residential construction projects and expedite the project review process.
Continue to allow second units, condominium conversions, caretaker units and second floor residential use in commercial zones
Remove governmental constraints on housing development.
Open Space and Recreation Element
Policy 4.1:Policy 4.3:Policy 4.4: Policy OS1-2.4:Policy OS1-2.5:Policy 051-3.3Policy 051-5.2: Policy 051-5.3:
as specified in the El Segundo Municipal Code. such as plazas, courtyards, ·and esplanades, in conjunction with non-residential development.by homeowners associations.City’s Zoning Ordinance
a requirement for a minimum amount of landscaping for all multi-family residential, commercial, and industrial development projects.
APPENDIX A Goal 4: •••The Specific Plan addresses the Housing Element goals and policies related to the development of a range of housing types, including affordable housing, within
the Downtown. The Specific Plan provides standards and objectives to implement affordable housing opportunities throughout the Downtown with a mix of housing types to serve a wide
range of income levels.5.Objective 051-2 Private Facilities recognition of their value as community recreation and open space resources.••Objective 051-3 Recreation Programs.•Objective
051-5 Natural Resources.••PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
A-10
A-11
APPENDIX A
: Establish density and development standards that protect and reflect the character and quality of existing neighborhoods and
: Protect the coastal habitat of the El Segundo Blue Butterfly.
: Identify the characteristics and qualities of the urban landscape that are valued by the community.: Encourage that any new landscaped areas respect and incorporate the distinctive
elements of the existing community
: Develop and encourage environmental protection policies that protect sensitive habitat areas, including coordination with city,
: Preserve the character and quality of existing neighborhood and civic landscapes.
El Segundo Blue Butterfly. Protect the rare and endangered El Segundo Blue Butterfly.
: Urban Landscape. Develop programs to protect, enhance and increase the amount and quality of the urban landscape to maximize
Conservation Element
Policy CN4-1Policy CN4-2Policy CN5-1Policy CN5-2Policy CNS-4Policy CN5-6
county, state, and federal agencies having jurisdiction over such areas. minimize the loss of landscaped area.landscape.
The Specific Plan addresses the Open Space and Recreation Element objectives and policies related to the development of open space and gathering space and landscaping policies. The
Plan provides for the development of open space areas such as plazas and courtyards that activate the Downtown and promotes the use of landscaping and habitat areas for the El Segundo
Blue Butterfly.6.Goal CN4:••Goal CN5 aesthetic and environmental benefits.••••The Downtown Specific Plan is consistent with the urban landscape provisions of the Conservation Element.
The Plan protects and enhances the quality of the urban landscape of the Downtown, particularly the characteristics and qualities identified by the community as being valued and designates
habitat areas for the El Segundo Blue Butterfly.
Address noise impacts in all environmental documents for discretionary approval projects to ensure that
: Require all new projects to meet the City’s Noise Ordinance Standards as a condition of building permit approval.
It is the objective of the City of El Segundo to ensure that City residents are not exposed to stationary noise levels in excess
Program N1-2.1A: noise sources meet City Noise Ordinance standards. These sources may include: mechanical or electrical equipment, truck loading areas or outdoor speaker systems.
•
Policy N1-2.1
Provision of a Noise-Safe Environment. Encourage a high quality environment within all parts of the City of El Segundo where the
Noise Element
Objective N1-2:
of El Segundo’s Noise Ordinance standards.
APPENDIX A 7.Goal N1:public’s health, safety and welfare are not adversely affected by excessive noise.•The Downtown Specific Plan is consistent with the applicable Noise Element Goal,
Objective, Policy, and Program in that the Specific Plan requires that the current noise regulations of the Municipal Code be adhered to which address and mitigate any potential noise
conflicts.PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
A-12
Appendix
B
B
B-1
APPENDIX B
Land Use Definitions
Any establishment in which alcoholic beverages are sold for consumption off the premises.Any establishment in which alcoholic beverages are sold for consumption on the premises.Any establishment
in which alcoholic beverages are sold, served, or given away for consumption on-site as part of a restaurant, deli, market, or similar establishment where customers purchase food and
beverages and consume the food and beverages on the premises.A building or portion of a building, used for large-scale indoor gatherings of people. For example, assembly halls include
private educational facilities; religious institutions; clubs; lodges; theaters; and similar kinds of facilities whether available for public or private use.An establishment that produces
ales, beers, meads, hard ciders, wine, liquor and/or similar beverages on-site, and where customers purchase food or beverages and consume the food or beverages on the premises. Also
includes incidental sale of beverages for on-site and off-site consumption in keeping with the regulations of the Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and
Firearms (ATF).A building which is primarily utilized for entertainment and is open in the evening and serves alcohol, and may or may not serve food. Nightclubs include interior floor
space for dancing or standing in conjunction with an indoor entertainment activity, such as dance halls,
APPENDIX B: DEFINITIONSA.Introduction This appendix defines the permitted uses in this Specific Plan that are technical or specialized land uses that may not reflect common usage. Land
uses not defined in this appendix are defined in ESMC Section 15-1-6 (Definitions).B.Alcohol Sales, Off-SiteAlcohol Sales, On-Site Alcohol Sales, On-Site with Food ServiceAssembly HallsBrewery
and Alcohol Production (including on-site consumption or restaurant)Nightclub
An exterior dining area within private property outside of the public right-of-way with seats and/or tables, umbrellas, portable heaters, lighting, potted plants, or other furnishings
primarily intended for use by the customers of the business with which the furnishings are associated. Outdoor dining is ancillary and contiguous to an approved restaurant or business
and located outside the walls of a building or structure, typically along the building frontage.Exterior dining/seating areas within the public right-of-way containing seats, tables,
umbrellas, potted plants, and/or other furnishings primarily intended for use by customers of adjoining businesses. Parklets typically function as extensions of the public sidewalk
and replace on-street parking spaces.Uses occupying at a minimum 25% of a building’s floor area and the front 20 feet of a building, with the exception of any common hallway or access
to uses behind or above. In cases of corner lots or other unique circumstances, the Director shall adjust the above requirements at his/her discretion.A building or structure owned,
operated, or occupied by a governmental agency. Public facilities include: municipal, county, state or federal governmental facilities.Space in an outdoor or indoor area, building,
part of a building, structure, or a defined area, which is utilized primarily for the creation of film, television, music video, multimedia, or other related activities.Temporary short-term
sales or display of supplies or a retail activity in an permitted outdoor location that may be conducted under a non-permanent tent, canopy, or other sun shelter. Outdoor retail sales
events shall not involve the construction of, or significant changes to, permanent buildings, paving, or structures. The Director of Community Development shall be responsible for reviewing
and approving retail sales events, subject to any terms, conditions, or special limitations deemed necessary.A basement equipped, designed, used, or intended to be used, for parking
automobiles. A parking structure is intended primarily for the interior parking or storage of motor vehicles for any period of time.
APPENDIX BOutdoor DiningParkletsPrimary Street Ground Floor UsesPublic FacilitiesStudio/Sound Stages and Support FacilitiesTemporary Outdoor Retail Sales EventsUnderground Parking Facilities
and Parking Structures PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFTNovember 2023
B-2
Air QualityStudy
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan
UpdateProject
September 13, 2023
Air Quality Study
1. Introduction
This report evaluates the air quality impacts that could result from implementation of the El
Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Project (Project). Supporting documents such as
calculation worksheets and modeling outputs are included in the appendix to this report.
2. Project Description
revise
the existing Specific Plan planning districts, amend General Plan and zoning designations on
eight parcels, and include mobility enhancements. The Project would include public improvements
and streetscape guidelines, private urban form criteria, permitted land uses, development
standards, mobility and infrastructure improvements, an implementation plan, and administration
processes. The Project would allow for increases of up to 130,000 square feet of retail and
restaurant uses, 200,000 square feet of office uses, 24,000 square feet of medical office uses,
and 300 residential uses. Mobility enhancements would include expanding pedestrian areas along
portions of Main Street, Richmond Street, and Grand Avenue, which could affect the number of
travel lanes on those streets. The Project would potentially relocate a portion of an existing truck
route that is located on Main Street. It proposes the potential permanent closure of a portion of
Richmond Street to vehicles, and a variety of other minor pedestrian and transit improvements
(e.g., widened sidewalks, expanded outdoor seating and dining areas, bus stop enhancements,
etc.). The Project would also include modifications to parking standards and strategies, as well
as alternatives for on-street parking. Relatedly, the Project may potentially involve the
construction of two new parking structures at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Standard
Street and the northeast corner of Richmond Street and Franklin Avenue.
3. Environmental Setting
3.1 Regulatory Framework
3.1.1 Federal
3.1.1.1 Clean Air Act
The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) was first enacted in 1955 and has been amended numerous
times in subsequent years, with the most recent amendments occurring in 1990. At the federal
level, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is responsible for
implementing some portions of the CAA (e.g., certain mobile source and other requirements).
Other portions of the CAA (e.g., stationary source requirements) are implemented by state and
local agencies. In California the California Clean Air Act (CCAA) is administered by the California
Air Resources Board (CARB) at the state level and by the air quality management districts and
air pollution control districts at the regional and local levels.
The CAA governs the establishment, review, and revision, as appropriate, of the National Ambient
environment. NAAQS are based on quantitative characterizations of exposures and associated
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
risks to human health and the environment. The 1990 amendments to the CAA identify specific
emission reduction goals for areas not meeting the NAAQS. These amendments require both a
demonstration of reasonable further progress towards attainment and the incorporation of
additional sanctions for failure to attain or to meet interim milestones. NAAQS have been
established for seven major air pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO), ozone
2
(O), PM(particulate matter, 2.5 microns), PM (particulate matter, 10 microns), sulfur dioxide
32.5 10
(SO), and lead (Pb).
2
The CAA requires USEPA to designate areas as attainment, nonattainment, or maintenance
(previously nonattainment and currently attainment) for each criteria pollutant based on whether
the NAAQS have been achieved. The federal standards are shown in Table 1. USEPA has
classified the Los Angeles County portion of the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) as a nonattainment
area for O, PM, and lead.
32.5
Table 1
State and Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards and Attainment for L.A. County
California Federal
Averaging
Pollutant
Attainment Attainment
Period
Standard Standard
Status Status
0.09 ppm Non-
1-hour - -
3
(180 µg/m) attainment
Ozone O
3
0.070 ppm Non-0.070 ppm Non-
8-hour
3 3
(137 µg/m) attainment(137 µg/m) attainment
Non-
33
24-hour 50 µg/m 150 µg/m Attainment
attainment
Respirable
Particulate Matter
Annual
Non-
PM
3
10
Arithmetic 20 µg/m - -
attainment
Mean
Non-
3
24-hour - - 35 µg/m
attainment
Fine Particulate
Annual
Matter PM
2.5
Non-Non-
33
Arithmetic 12 µg/m 12 µg/m
attainment attainment
Mean
20 ppm 35 ppm
1-hour Attainment Attainment
33
(23 mg/m) (40 mg/m)
Carbon Monoxide
CO
9.0 ppm 9 ppm
8-hour Attainment Attainment
33
(10 mg/m) (10 mg/m)
0.18 ppm 100 ppb
1-hour Attainment Attainment
33
(338 µg/m) (188 µg/m)
Nitrogen Dioxide
Annual
NO
2
0.030 ppm 53 ppb
Arithmetic Attainment Attainment
33
(57 µg/m) (100 µg/m)
Mean
0.25 ppm 75 ppb
1-hour Attainment Attainment
33
(655 µg/m) (196 µg/m)
Sulfur Dioxide SO
2
0.04 ppm
24-hour Attainment - -
3
(105 µg/m)
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
30-day
3
1.5 µg/m Attainment - -
average
Lead Pb
Calendar Non-
3
- - 0.15 µg/m
Quarter attainment
Source: Maps of State and Federal Area Designations,
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/maps-state-and-federal-area-designations. Accessed
September 7, 2023.
3.1.2 State
3.1.2.1 California Clear Air Act
In addition to being subject to the requirements of the CAA, air quality in California is also
governed by more stringent regulations under the CCAA. In California the CCAA is administered
by CARB at the state level and by the air quality management districts and air pollution control
districts at the regional and local levels. CARB, which became part of the California Environmental
Protection Agency in 1991, is responsible for meeting the state requirements of the CAA,
administering the CCAA, and establishing the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS).
The CCAA, as amended in 1992, requires all air districts in the State to achieve and maintain the
CAAQS. CAAQS are generally more stringent than their corresponding NAAQS and incorporate
additional standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility-reducing particles.
CAAQS define clean air: they represent the maximum amount of a pollutant averaged over a
specified period of time that can be present in outdoor air without any harmful effects on people
or the environment.
The CCAA requires CARB to designate areas within California as either attainment or
nonattainment for each criteria pollutant based on whether the CAAQS thresholds have been
achieved. Under the CCAA, areas are designated as nonattainment for a pollutant if air quality
data shows that a state standard for the pollutant was violated at least once during the previous
three calendar years. Exceedances that are affected by highly irregular or infrequent events are
not considered violations of a state standard and are not used as a basis for designating areas
as nonattainment. Under the CCAA, the non-desert Los Angeles County portion of the Basin is
designated as a nonattainment area for O, PM, and PM. The State standards and
3102.5
attainment/non-attainment are also shown in Table 1.
3.1.2.2 California Air Toxics Program
Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act. AB 1807 directs CARB and the State Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) to identify toxic air contaminants (TACs)
and determine whether any regulatory action is necessary to reduce their risks to public health.
Substances formally identified as TACs include diesel particulate matter and environmental
tobacco smoke.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
3.1.2.3 Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective
Released by CARB in 2005, the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health
Perspective provides recommendations regarding the siting of new sensitive land uses near
potential sources of TACs (e.g., freeways, distribution centers, rail yards, ports, refineries, chrome
plating facilities, dry cleaners, and gas stations), as well as the siting of new TAC sources in
1
proximity to existing sensitive land uses. The recommendations are advisory and should not
necessarily be interpre If a project or sensitive land uses are within
the siting distance, CARB recommends further analysis.
3.1.3 Regional
3.1.3.1 South Coast Air Quality Management District
The Project is located within the 6,745-square-mile South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The Basin
includes all of Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San
Bernardino counties. It is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west; the San Gabriel, San
Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east; and the San Diego County line to
the south. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is the agency principally
responsible for air pollution control in the Basin. Specifically, SCAQMD is responsible for planning,
implementing, and enforcing programs designed to attain and maintain CAAQS established by
CARB and NAAQS established by the USEPA. All projects in the SCAQMD jurisdiction are
subject to SCAQMD rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, the following:
Rule 401 Visible Emissions: This rule prohibits air discharge that results in a plume that is as
dark as or darker than what is designed as No. 1 Ringelmann Chart by the United States
Bureau of Mines for an aggregate of three minutes in any one hour.
Rule 402 Nuisance:
or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable
number of people or the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of
any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury
Rule 403 Fugitive Dust: This rule mandates that projects reduce the amount of particulate
matter entrained in the ambient air as a result of fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to
prevent, reduce, or mitigate fugitive dust emissions from any active operation, open storage
pile, or disturbed surface area.
3.1.3.2 2022 Air Quality Management Plan
2022 Air Quality Management Plan (2022 AQMP) was adopted in December 2022
and represents the most updated regional blueprint for achieving federal air quality standards. It
relies on emissions forecasts based on demographic and economic growth projections provided
20-2045 Regional
Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2020-2045 RTP/SCS).
1
CARB, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook, A Community Health Perspective, April 2005.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
3.1.3.3 Southern California Association of Governments
SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San
Bernardino, and Imperial Counties that is tasked with addressing regional issues relating to
transportation, the economy, community development, and the environment. As the federally
designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the six-county Southern California
region, SCAG is required by law to ensure that transportation activities conform to, and are
supportive of, regional and state air quality plan goals to attain NAAQS. Additionally, SCAG is a
co-producer, along with the SCAQMD, of the transportation strategy and transportation control
The 2020-
latest long-range plan, continues to recognize that transportation investments and future land use
patterns are inextricably linked, and acknowledges how this relationship can help the region make
choices that sustain existing resources while expanding efficiency, mobility, and accessibility for
people across the region. In short, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS offers a blueprint for how Southern
California can grow more sustainably.
The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS land use pattern continues the trend of focusing new housing and
Priority Growth Areas (PGAs) and aims to enhance and build
Quality Transit Areas (HQTAs), Neighborhood Mobility Areas (NMAs), Livable Corridors, and
Spheres of Influence (SOIs) account for just 4 percent of total land in the SCAG region, but they
are projected to accommodate 64 percent of the 74 percent
2
5. According to the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, dense
infill development in PGAs can help reduce travel distances, increase mobility options, leverage
transit investments, and improve access to workplaces and other destinations, reducing vehicle
miles traveled (VMT) and associated emissions.
3.1.4 City of El Segundo
3.1.4.1 El Segundo General Plan Air Quality Element
was prepared to address the issue of air pollution
3
governmental responsibility for air quality. As explained earlier, the 2022 AQMP is the
current and latest
objectives, and policies are still relevant today. They are shown below:
Goal AQ1: Person Work Trip Reduction for Private Employees
Objective AQ1-1: A 30 percent reduction in private employee work trips in new and existing
development through the use of any combination of alternate work weeks
and telecommuting strategies.
2
SCAG, Final 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, September 2020.
3
City of El Segundo, General Plan Air Quality Element, 1992.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
Policy AQ1-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City encourage businesses
to adopt alternative work schedules and prepare guidelines to assist local
businesses in the implementation of alternative work schedule programs.
Policy AQ1-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that businesses be encouraged to
establish and maintain telecommuting or work-at-home programs to reduce
employee work trips.
Policy AQ1-1.3: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that Transportation System
Management (TSM) plans provide a 30 percent reduction in vehicle
ridership or the equivalent Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) per commute
vehicle.
Goal AQ2: Person Work Trip Reduction for Local Government Employees
Objective AQ2-1: A 30 percent reduction in local government employee work trips using any
combination of alternative work weeks and telecommuting strategies.
Policy AQ2-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that a study be conducted to
implement alternative work schedules and work-at-home programs for City
employees that will maximize the potential for increasing employee
productivity.
Policy AQ2-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City designate an Employee
Transportation Coordinator to promote and institute ridesharing and other
programs to achieve a 30 percent reduction in vehicle ridership for City
employees.
Goal AQ3: Vehicle Work Trip Reduction for Private Employees
Objective AQ3-1: Increase the proportion of work trips made by transit.
Policy AQ3-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City continue to require
employers in existing congested areas of the City and developers of large
new developments to adopt Transportation System Management (TSM)
plans and provide incentives for the provision of transit support facilities.
Policy AQ3-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that it continues to require
developer TSM plans to encourage trip reduction programs and
development of transit and ridesharing facilities over highway capacity
expansion in order to achieve and maintain mobility and air quality.
Policy AQ3-1.3: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo to cooperate with efforts to expand
bus, rail, and other forms of transit within the Los Angeles region.
Goal AQ4: Reduce Motorized Transportation
Objective AQ4-1: Promote non-motorized transportation.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
Policy AQ4-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City actively encourage the
development and maintenance of a high-quality network of pedestrian and
bicycle routes, linked to key locations, in order to promote non-motorized
transportation.
Goal AQ5: Vehicle Work and Non-Work Trip Reduction
Objective AQ5-1: Improve transit systems serving the City and implement parking control
methods to reduce work and non-work trips.
Policy AQ5-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City discourage the use of
single-occupant vehicles in congested areas of the City by changing or
modifying the availability and cost of parking.
Policy AQ5-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City actively encourage the
enhancement of transit performance and availability and establish
developer fees to offset the costs of transit improvements required as a
result of new developments.
Goal AQ6: Reduction in Peak-period Truck Travel and Number and Severity of
Truck-involved Accidents
Objective AQ6-1: Pass the necessary ordinances and memorandums of understanding to
divert truck traffic during peak traffic periods.
Objective AQ6-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that commercial truck emissions
be reduced by restricting delivery schedules to off-peak traffic periods, and
roadway system.
Goal AQ7: Reduce Vehicle Emissions Through Traffic Flow Improvements
Objective AQ7-1: Set annual objectives for the continued improvement of interconnected
traffic signal control systems or appropriate non-interconnected
synchronization methods on all streets where traffic volume and delay time
is significant.
Policy AQ7-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that a high priority be given to
improve the flow of traffic through synchronization of signalized
intersections, as this is among the most cost-effective means of reducing
congestion, conserving energy, and improving air quality.
Goal AQ8: Reduction in Tailpipe Emissions from Local Government Vehicle
Fleets
Objective AQ8-1: Support legislation which would improve vehicle/transportation technology
Policy AQ8-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City support legislation for
the use and ownership of clean fuel vehicles.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
Policy AQ8-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City support legislation for
research, development, and demonstration of clean fuel vehicles in both
fleet service and passenger use.
Policy AQ8-1.3: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City invest in clean fuel
systems on new City fleet vehicles.
Goal AQ9: Reduction in Length of Vehicle Trips
Objective AQ9-1:
average length of commute-trips by the year 2010, as designated by
SCAG.
Policy AQ9-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City promote a better
balance of jobs and housing within the City by considering housing
proposals within areas of the City designated for Smoky Hollow Mixed-Use.
Policy AQ9-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City participate in sub
regional efforts with other cities or agencies to develop mutually beneficial
approaches to improving the balance of jobs and housing.
Policy AQ9-1.3: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City actively encourage the
establishment of a shuttle bus system to transport employees and El
Segundo residents between the east and west sides of the City.
Goal AQ10: Reduction in Particulate Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads,
Parking Lots, and Road and Building Construction
Objective AQ10-1: Control particulate emissions by paving roads and parking lots or by
adopting alternative methods to control particulates.
Policy AQ10-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that an ordinance be adopted
requiring the paving or use of alternative particulate control methods on
roads with low levels of vehicle traffic and on dirt roads and parking lots
located on industrialized properties such as Chevron and Edison.
Policy AQ10-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo to adopt incentives, regulations,
and/or procedures to prohibit the use of building materials and methods
which generate excessive pollutants.
Policy AQ10-1.3: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that all new development projects
meet or exceed requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management
District for reducing PM10 standards.
Goal AQ11: Reduce Emissions Associated with Government Energy
Consumption
Objective AQ11-1: Reduce energy use by City government facilities with an emphasis on peak
demand reduction as stated by SCAG.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
Policy AQ11-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that a study be prepared to initiate
implementation of a program for retrofitting City buildings with a full range
of energy conservation measures.
Goal AQ12: Reduction in Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Energy
Consumption
Objective AQ12-1: Enact the recommendations of the AQMP Energy Working Group for
commercial and residential buildings and adopt ordinances to mitigate air
quality impacts from water and pool heating systems.
Policy AQ12-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that an ordinance be adopted
requiring all new swimming pool water heater systems to utilize solar,
electric, or low NOX gas-fired water heaters, and/or pool covers.
Policy AQ12-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City encourage the
incorporation of energy conservation features in the design of new projects
and the installation of conservation devices in existing developments.
Policy AQ12-1.3: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo to provide incentives and/or
regulations to reduce emissions from residential and commercial water
heating.
Policy AQ12-1.4: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that new construction not preclude
the use of solar energy systems by uses and buildings on adjacent
properties and consider enactment of a comprehensive solar access
ordinance.
Goal AQ13: Increase Recycling of Solid Waste and Use of Recycled Materials by
Glass and Paper Manufacturers
Objective AQ13-1: Reduce the amount of solid waste by 25 percent by 1994, and 50 percent
by 2000.
Policy AQ13-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City continue to implement
concurrent with California Assembly Bill 939, to achieve a 25 percent
reduction in residential solid waste requiring disposal by 1995, and a 50
percent reduction by the year 2000.
Goal AQ14: Prevent Exposure of People, Animals, and Other Living Organisms to
Toxic Air Pollutants
Objective AQ14-1: Restrict emissions of toxic air contaminants in and around the City and
insure that sources which impact the City comply with all federal, state,
regional, and local regulations.
Policy AQ14-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo to protect residents and others from
exposure to toxic air pollutants by identifying major sources of toxic
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
contaminants in and around the City and insuring that the sources comply
with all federal, state, regional, and local regulations.
Policy AQ14-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo to draft and implement ordinances,
where deemed appropriate by the City Council in its discretion, which go
beyond the AQMP and SCAQMD regulations to restrict emissions of toxic
air contaminants from sources of toxic air pollutants which impact the City
of El Segundo.
Goal AQ15: Prevent Exposure of People, Animals, and Other Living Organisms to
Unhealthful Levels of Air Pollution
Objective AQ15-1: Reduce unsafe levels of air pollutants impacting the City.
Policy AQ15-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo to protect the residents of the City
and others from exposure to unsafe levels of air pollution, including but not
limited to, pollutants such as volatile organic compounds, particulates,
oxides of nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, lead, ozone, and carbon monoxide, by
taking all appropriate air pollution control measures to reduce unsafe levels
of air pollutants impacting the City.
Policy AQ15-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo to coordinate with the SCAQMD to
ensure that all elements of the AQMP regarding reduction of all air pollutant
emissions are being met and are being enforced.
Policy AQ15-1.3: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo to draft and implement ordinances
where deemed appropriate by the City Council in its discretion, which go
beyond the AQMP and SCAQMD regulations to reduce emission of and
exposure to air pollutants which impact the City of El Segundo.
Policy AQ15-1.4: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo to continue working with the City
of Los Angeles to eliminate odor problems from the Hyperion Treatment
Plant; this will include the continuation of the Mitigation Monitoring
Implementation Plan.
3.1.4.2 El Segundo Municipal Code
The City of El Segundo Municipal Code contains the following standards related to air quality:
Section 7-3-1: It is the policy to prohibit unnecessary and excessive emission of dust and
particulate matter from all sources subject to its police power. Therefore,
the City Council does ordain and declare that creating, maintaining,
causing or allowing to be created, maintained, or caused, any emissions of
dust or particulate matter in a manner prohibited by or not in conformity
with the provisions of this Chapter, is a public nuisance and shall be
punished as such.
A. Dust Emissions: A person shall not create, maintain or cause or allow
to be created, maintained or caused, the emissions of dust or
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
particulate matter from any transport, handling, construction,
demolition, excavation, grading, clearing of land or storage activity so
that the presence of such dust or particulate matter remains visible in
the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source.
B. Exclusions: A person or entity shall not be found in violation of
subsection (A) of this Section if that person or entity has taken every
reasonable precaution to minimize the dust or particulate matter
emissions resulting from its activity. Reasonable precautions include,
but are not limited to, the following: site watering; soil binders; street
sweeping; organic control erosion amts; covering loose soil; sloping
and bracing excavation sites to minimize erosion; and establishing
ground cover.
3.2 Pollutants and Effects
3.2.1 State and Federal Criteria Pollutants
Air quality is measured by the ambient air concentrations of seven pollutants that have been
identified by the USEPA due to their potentially harmful effects on public health and the
-level ozone,
nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter ten microns or less in diameter, particulate
matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter, and lead. The following descriptions of each criteria air
pollutant and their health effects are based on information provided by the USEPA and the
4,5
SCAQMD.
Carbon Monoxide CO
CO is a colorless and odorless gas that is released when something is burned. Outdoors,
the greatest sources of CO are cars, trucks, and other vehicles or machinery that burn
fossil fuels. Unvented kerosene and gas space heaters, leaking chimneys and furnaces,
and gas stoves can release CO and affect air quality indoors. Breathing air with elevated
concentrations of CO reduces the amount of oxygen that can be transported via the blood
stream and can lead to weakened heart contractions; as a result, CO inhalation can be
particularly harmful to people with chronic heart disease. At moderate concentrations, CO
inhalation can cause nausea, dizziness, and headaches. High concentrations of CO may
be fatal; however, such conditions are not likely to occur outdoors.
Ozone O
3
O is a colorless gas that is formed when volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen
3
oxides (NO) undergo slow photochemical reactions in the presence of ultraviolet sunlight.
X
The greatest source of VOC and NO emissions is automobile exhaust. O concentrations
X3
are generally highest during the summer months when direct sunlight, light wind, and
warm temperatures are favorable to its formation. Elevated levels of O irritate the lungs
3
and airways and may cause throat and chest pain, as well as coughing, thereby increasing
4
USEPA, Criteria Air Pollutants, www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants.
5
SCAQMD, Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan, February 2013.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
susceptibility to respiratory infections and reducing the ability to exercise. Effects are more
severe in people with asthma and other respiratory ailments. Long-term exposure may
lead to the scarring of lung tissue and reduced lung efficiency.
Nitrogen Dioxide NO
2
NO is primarily a byproduct of fossil fuel combustion and is therefore emitted by
2
automobiles, power plants, and industrial facilities. The principal form of nitrogen oxide
produced by fossil fuel combustion is nitric oxide (NO), which reacts quickly to form NO,
2
creating the mixture of NO and NO commonly called NO. NO absorbs blue light and
2X2
results in reduced visibility and a brownish-red cast to the atmosphere. NO also
2
contributes to the formation of PM. Nitrogen oxides irritate the nose and throat and
10
increase susceptibility to respiratory infections, especially in people with asthma. Longer
exposures to elevated concentrations of NO may even contribute to the development of
2
asthma. The principal concern of NO is as a precursor to the formation of ozone.
X
Sulfur Dioxide SO
2
Sulfur oxides (SO) are compounds of sulfur and oxygen molecules. SO is the pre-
X2
dominant form found in the lower atmosphere and is a product of burning sulfur or sulfur-
containing materials. Major sources of SO include power plants, large industrial facilities,
2
diesel vehicles, and oil-burning residential heaters. SO may aggravate lung diseases,
2
especially bronchitis. It also constricts breathing passages, especially in asthmatics and
people involved in moderate to heavy exercise. SO may cause wheezing, shortness of
2
breath, and coughing. High levels of particulates appear to worsen the effect of SO, and
2
long-term exposure to both pollutants leads to higher rates of respiratory illnesses.
Particulate Matter (PM and PM)
102.5
The human body naturally prevents the entry of larger particles into itself. However,
smaller particles less than 10 microns (PM) or even less than 2.5 microns (PM) in
102.5
diameter can enter the body and become trapped in the nose, throat, and upper
respiratory tract. Here, these particulates may aggravate existing heart and lung diseases,
sensitive to PM and PM include children, the elderly, and those with chronic lung
102.5
and/or heart disease.
Lead Pb
Airborne lead is emitted from industrial facilities and from the sanding or removal of old
lead-based paint. Smelting and other metal processing activities are the primary sources
of lead emissions. The lead effects most commonly encountered in current populations
are neurological effects in children and cardiovascular effects in adults (e.g., high blood
pressure and heart disease). Infants and young children are especially sensitive to even
low levels of lead, which may contribute to behavioral problems, learning deficits, and
lowered IQ.
3.2.2 Toxic Air Contaminants - TACs
-
not had ambient air quality standards established for them. This is not because they are
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
fundamentally different from the pollutants discussed above, but because their effects tend to be
local rather than regional. As discussed earlier, CARB and OEHHA determine if a substance
6
One key TAC is diesel particulate matter (diesel PM), which is emitted in diesel engine exhaust.
Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study V (MATES V) determined that about 88
percent of the carcinogenic risk from air toxics in the Basin is attributable to mobile source
emissions. Of the three carcinogenic TACs that constitute the majority of the known health risk
from gas- and diesel-powered vehicle emissions diesel PM from primarily trucks, and benzene
and 1,3-butadiene from passenger vehicles diesel PM is responsible for the greatest potential
7
cancer risk from vehicle traffic. Overall, diesel PM was found to account for, on average, about
8
50 percent of the air toxics risk in the Basin. In addition to its carcinogenic potential, diesel PM
may also contribute to increased respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations, worsened
asthma and other respiratory symptoms, decreased lung function in children, and premature
death for people already with heart or lung disease. Those most vulnerable to the non-cancer
health effects of diesel PM are children whose lungs are still developing and the elderly who may
9
have other chronic health problems.
3.2.3 Volatile Organic Compounds - VOCs
VOCs are typically formed from the combustion of fuels and/or released through the evaporation
of organic liquids. Some VOCs are also classified by the state as toxic air contaminants, though
there are no VOC-specific ambient air quality standards. Once emitted, VOCs can mix in the air
with other pollutants (e.g. NO, CO, SO
X2
smog.
3.3 Existing Conditions
As discussed earlier, the Project is located within the 6,745-square-mile South Coast Air Basin
that includes all of Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and
San Bernardino Counties. Air quality within the Basin is influenced by a wide range of emissions
sources, such as dense population centers, heavy vehicular traffic, and industry. These sources
in addition to the topography and climate of Southern California combine to make the Basin an
area of high air pollution potential. Particularly, ambient pollution concentrations recorded in the
Los Angeles County portion of the Basin are among the highest in the four counties comprising
the Basin. The USEPA has classified Los Angeles County as a nonattainment area for O, PM,
32.5
and lead, meaning that the Basin does not meet NAAQS for these pollutants. Additionally, this
portion of the Basin also does not meet CAAQS for O, PM, and PM. Table 1, above,
3102.5
6
CARB, Toxic Air Contaminant Identification List, www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/id/taclist.htm, last reviewed
by CARB July 18, 2011.
7
CARB, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April 2005.
8
SCAQMD, Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the South Coast Air Basin (MATES V), 2021.
9
CARB, Overview: Diesel Exhaust & Health, ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/overview-diesel-exhaust-
and-health.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
summarizes State and National Ambient Air Quality Standards and the attainment status for Los
Angeles County with respect to each criteria pollutant.
3.3.1 Existing Pollutant Levels
The SCAQMD monitors air quality conditions in 38 source receptor areas (SRA) throughout
the BasinSRA No. 3Southwest Coastal Los Angeles
CountyTable 2 shows pollutant levels, State and federal standards, and the number of
exceedances recorded in SRA No. 3 from 2019 through 2021. As shown, the eight-hour Federal
and State standard for O was exceeded twice during this three-year period, and the State one-
3
hour standard was exceeded once. The State standard for PM was exceeded twice. The Federal
10
standard for PM was not exceeded. CO, NO, and SO levels did not exceed their respective
1022
CAAQS or NAAQS during this period. Data for PM is not available for the time period.
2.5
Table 2
Ambient Air Quality Data SRA No. 3 Southwest Coastal Los Angeles County
Maximum Concentrations and Frequencies
of State/Federal Standards Exceedance
Pollutants and State and Federal Standards
2019 2020 2021
Ozone O
3
Maximum 1-hour Concentration (ppm) 0.082 0.117 0.059
Maximum 8-hour Concentration (ppm) 0.067 0.074 0.049
Days > 0.070 ppm (Federal/State 8-hour standard) 0 2 0
Days > 0.09 ppm (State 1-hour standard) 0 1 0
Carbon Monoxide CO
Maximum 1-hour Concentration (ppm) 1.8 1.6 1.7
Maximum 8-hour Concentration (ppm) 1.3 1.3 1.3
Days > 35 ppm (Federal 1-hour standard) 0 0 0
Days > 20 ppm (State 1-hour standard) 0 0 0
Days > 9.0 ppm (Federal/State 8-hour standard) 0 0 0
Nitrogen Dioxide NO
2
Maximum 1-hour Concentration (ppb) 56.6 59.7 62.8
Days > 100 ppb (Federal 1-hour standard) 0 0 0
Days > 0.18 ppm (State 1-hour standard) 0 0 0
PM
10
3
Maximum 24-hour Concentration (µm/m) 62 43 33
3
Days > 150 µg/m (Federal 24-hour standard) 0 0 0
3
Days > 50 µg/m (State 24-hour standard) 2 0 0
PM
2.5
3
Maximum 24-hour Concentration (µg/m) N/A N/A N/A
3
Days > 35 µg/m (Federal 24-hour standard) N/A N/A N/A
Sulfur Dioxide SO
2
Maximum 24-hour Concentration (ppb) 8.2 6.0 7.7
Days > 75 ppb (Federal 1-hour standard) 0 0 0
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
Days > 250 ppb (State 1-hour standard) 0 0 0
Days > 40 ppb (State 24-hour standard) 0 0 0
Lead - Pb
3
Maximum Monthly Average Concentration (µg/m) 0.004 0.008 0.012
3
Maximum 3-Month Rolling Averages (µg/m) 0.004 0.005 0.012
Notes:
N/A = data not available
ppm = parts per million of air, by volume
ppb = parts per billion of air, by voume
3
µg/m = micrograms per cubic meter
Source: SCAQMD Historical Data By Year, www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/air-quality-data-
studies/historical-data-by-year. Accessed September 11, 2023.
3.3.2 Existing Health Risk
The Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study V (MATES V) is the latest air toxics monitoring and
evaluation study conducted in the Air Basin. In short, MATES V is a modeling effort to characterize
risk from air toxics across the Air Basin. The Specific Plan area is located within the 90245 zip
code. Based on the MATES V model, the calculated cancer risk from air toxics in the 90245 zip
code is approximately 540 in one million, which is higher than
higher than it is for 78.0 percent of
10
the population with the Air Basin.
The OEHHA, on behalf of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), provides a
screening tool called CalEnviroScreen that identifies which California communities are
disproportionately burdened by, and vulnerable to, multiple sources of pollution. The tool ranks
census tracts in California based on potential exposures to pollutants, adverse environmental
conditions, socioeconomic factors, and prevalence of certain health conditions. According to
CalEnviroScreen 4.0, the Specific Planpollution-specific burden, irrespective of other
th11
socioeconomic factors, is ranked 84 percentile.
3.3.3 Sensitive Receptors
Some land uses are considered more sensitive to changes in air quality than others, depending
on the population groups and the activities involved. Generally speaking, sensitive land uses, or
sensitive receptors, are those where sensitive individuals are most likely to spend time. Individuals
most susceptible to poor air quality include children, the elderly, athletes, and those with
cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. As a result, land uses sensitive to air quality may
include schools (i.e., elementary schools or high schools), childcare centers, parks and
playgrounds, long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation facilities, convalescent facilities,
10
SCAQMD, Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study V, MATES Data Visualization Tool,
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/79d3b6304912414bb21ebdde80100b23/page/home/?d
ata_id=dataSource_105-a5ba9580e3aa43508a793fac819a5a4d%3A204&views=view_1.
Accessed September 11, 2023.
11
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, CalEnviroScreen 4.0.
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/11d2f52282a54ceebcac7428e6184203/page/CalEnviro
Screen-4_0/. September 11, 2023.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
retirement facilities, residences, and athletic facilities. For the purposes of CEQA analysis, the
SCAQMD considers a sensitive receptor to be a receptor such as a residence, hospital, or
convalescent facility where an individual could remain for 24 hours. The SCAQMD does not
consider commercial and industrial facilities to be sensitive receptors because employees do not
typically remain onsite at such facilities for 24 hours. However, the SCAQMD suggests that LSTs
based on shorter averaging periods, such as the NO and CO LSTs, may also be applied to
2
receptors such as commercial and industrial facilities since it is reasonable to assume that
12
workers at these sites may be present for up to eight hours.
, as defined by the SCAQMD (e.g., residences, hospitals,
or convalescent facilities) are the following:
Multi-family residential building (350 Richmond Street) this sensitive receptor is located
within the Specific Plan area.
Residential uses along Richmond Street, near Grand Avenue these sensitive receptors
are located within the Specific Plan area.
Residential land uses located along and west of Richmond Street other sensitive
receptors located along Richmond Street are directly north of the Specific Plan area,
across Holly Avenue.
Residential land uses located along and east of Standard Street the nearest residential
uses are directly east of the Specific Plan area, across Standard Street.
Residential land uses located along and west of Concord Street the nearest residential
uses are directly west of the Specific Plan area, across Concord Street.
The Project would allow for the construction of up to 300 residential units, which could also be
sensitive receptors to the air emissions of future development under the Project.
Though not technically sensitive receptors, as defined by the SCAQMD, the following receptors
are also worth identifying:
Richmond Street Elementary School (615 Richmond Street) approximately 275 feet
northeast of the Specific Plan area.
El Segundo High School (640 Main Street) directly north of the Specific Plan area, across
Mariposa Avenue.
El Segundo Pre-School (301 West Grand Avenue) directly west of the Specific Plan
area, across Concord Street.
Non-sensitive commercial land uses where workers may be present for up to eight hours include
a multitude of uses located within the Specific Plan area.
12
SCAQMD, Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, June 2003. Revised July 2008.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
4. Project Impacts
4.1 Thresholds of Significance
4.1.1 State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G
In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the Project would have a significant
impact related to air quality if the Project would:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which
the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative
thresholds for ozone precursors)?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
4.2.1 Criteria Pollutants Construction
air quality standards to be used to evaluate project construction impacts with respect to the
Appendix G thresholds. Under these thresholds, a significant impact would occur if:
Regional emissions from both direct and indirect sources exceed the thresholds shown in
Table 3.
Maximum on-site daily localized emissions exceed the LSTs also shown in Table 3.
Table 3
SCAQMD Construction Emissions Thresholds
Construction Emissions (lbs per day)
Criteria Pollutant
A
Regional Localized
Volatile Organic Compounds VOCs 75 -
Nitrogen Oxides - NO100 131
X
Carbon Monoxide CO 550 967
Sulfur Oxides - SO150 -
X
Respirable Particulates PM150 8
10
Fine Particulates PM55 5
2.5
A
Localized significance thresholds assumed the following:
Sources: SCAQMD, Air Quality Significance Thresholds, revised April 2019; and, SCAQMD, LST
Methodology Appendix C Mass Rate LST Look-Up Table, October 2009.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
The LSTs shown in Table 3 are representative of a two-acre project site located within 25 meters
of sensitive receptors. As explained further below, a two-acre project site corresponds with the
scenario addressed in the analysis, which conservatively assumes that up
to ten percent of the Project more specifically ten percent of the increases in land uses allowed
by the Project (i.e., 20,000 square feet of the allowable 200,000 square feet increase in office
uses) could be under construction simultaneously. 25 meters is the shortest receptor distance
emissions thresholds for a given project size.
4.2.1 Criteria Pollutants Operations
The following SCAQMD thresholds serve as quantitative air quality standards to evaluate project
operational impacts with respect to the Appendix G thresholds. Under these thresholds, a
significant impact would occur if:
Operational emissions from both on- and off-site sources exceed the regional thresholds
shown in Table 4.
Maximum on-site daily localized emissions exceed the LSTs also shown in Table 4.
The Project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 402.
Table 4
SCAQMD Operational Emissions Thresholds
Operational Emissions (lbs per day)
Criteria Pollutant
A
Regional Localized
Volatile Organic Compounds - VOCs 55 -
Nitrogen Oxides - NO55 91
X
Carbon Monoxide CO 550 664
Sulfur Oxides - SO150 -
X
Respirable Particulates PM150 1
10
Fine Particulates PM55 1
2.5
A
Localized significance thresholds assumed the following:
The Project is located in SRA No. 3Southwest Coastal
Sources: SCAQMD, Air Quality Significance Thresholds, revised March 2023; and, SCAQMD,
LST Methodology Appendix C Mass Rate LST Look-Up Table, October 2009.
The LSTs shown in Table 4 are representative of a one-acre project site located within 25 meters
of sensitive receptors. A one-acre project site is the smallest project size used for analysis per
lysis
in this methodology. Thus, use of these assumptions is conservative and results in the most
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
4.2.3 TACs Health Risks
The following SCAQMD thresholds are utilized to evaluate project construction and operations-
related TAC impacts with respect to the Appendix G thresholds. Under these thresholds, a
significant impact would occur if the Project results in:
A maximum incremental cancer risk greater than or equal to 10 in one million.
A population wide cancer burden greater than 0.5 (in areas where existing cancer risk is
greater than or equal to one in one million.
A chronic or acute hazard index greater than or equal to 1.0.
5. Analysis of Project Impacts
5.1 Threshold a):
Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation
of the applicable air quality plan?
5.1.1 SCAQMD 2022 AQMP and SCAG 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Consistency
22 AQMP and
latest 2020-2045 RTP/SCS. As discussed earlier, the 2022
achieving state and federal air quality goals are based on population, housing, and employment
trend assumptions in the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, which are themselves largely based on growth
forecasts from local governments like the City of El Segundo. Therefore, a project is consistent
with the 2022 AQMP, in part, if it is consistent with the population, housing, and employment
assumptions and smart growth policies that were used in the formation of the AQMP.
-2045 RTP/SCS
and therefore would not result in emissions that are unaccounted for by the 2022 AQMP. As noted
earlier, Priority Growth Areas (PGAs) such as Job Centers, Transit Priority Areas (TPAs), High
Quality Transit Areas (HQTAs), Neighborhood Mobility Areas (NMAs), Livable Corridors, and
Spheres of Influence (SOIs) account for only four percent of t
but the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS anticipates that 64 percent of new household growth and 74 percent
of employment growth will occur in these PGAs. According to the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, dense
infill development in PGAs can support the goals of the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS by reducing travel
distances, increasing mobility options, improving access to workplaces, leveraging transit
investments, and conserving thThus, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS
emphasizes new infill construction in PGAs and assumes a significant increase in multi-family
housing and other dense urban uses built in such locations, in some cases outpacing what is
currently anticipated by local general plans. Projects fitting this land use pattern are consistent
with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
The Downtown Specific Plan Update aims to achieve or bolster this land use pattern within the
Specific Plan area. First, the Specific Plan area is already designated a NMA. The 2020-2045
RTP/SCS targets growth in NMAs because of NMAs robust residential to non-residential land use
connections and high roadway intersection densities. These features promote safer, multimodal,
short trips and can reduce reliance on single occupancy vehicles, reducing VMT.
Transportation Assessment, prepared by Fehr and Peers, supports this, concluding that the
Project would result in a reduction of VMT per service population as compared to citywide
baselines. On this basis alone, development of the Project and its land uses within the Specific
Plan area would be consistent with the 2020-
emphasize dense infill development within PGAs. Second, the Project proposes a range of
transportation and mobility improvements alkability and
promote alternative transportation modes. For example, the Project proposes the following
improvements:
Pedestrian crossing enhancements at 12 locations
Area-wide sidewalk curb ramp enhancements
Bicycle mobility enhancements on two roadway segments
Area-wide bicycle accommodation and wayfinding enhancements
Bus stop enhancements at six existing bus stops
Signal operation enhancements on two roadway segments
Area-wide intersection control improvements (signage and striping)
In-road bollard receptacles for temporary street closures at two locations
Area-wide on-street parking striping enhancements
Area-wide off-street parking optimization enhancements
By implementing these transportation and mobility improvements and by focusing dense new
retail, commercial, and residential uses within a PGA, the Project fits the land use pattern adopted
and emphasized by the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS and would contribute directly to its goals. The
Project would not result in growth or accompanying emissions that are unaccounted for by
the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS or the 2022 AQMP. Projects that are consistent with the 2020-2045
RTP/SCS are part of the regional solution for meeting
goals. In this regard, the Project would not have a significant long-
ability to meet state and federal air quality standards.
Additionally, to be discussed further below, pollutant emissions associated with the construction
and operations of future projects facilitated by the Downtown Specific Plan Update would neither
exceed nor substantially contribute to any exceedance of ambient air quality standards and
emissions reductions.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
Because Project-related growth would be consistent with 2022 AQMP projections that are
themselves based on 2020-2045 RTP/SCS projections, and because pollutant emissions
associated with the Project would neither exceed nor substantially contribute to any exceedance
of ambient air quality standards and thresholds, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the 2022 AQMP, and this impact would be less than significant.
5.2 Threshold b):
Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region
is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions
which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
5.2.1 Construction Emissions
By amending the land use designation and zoning on eight parcels within the Specific Plan area,
the Downtown Specific Plan Update would facilitate construction of projects within the Specific
Plan area through 2040. These projects could occur on any property within the Specific Plan area
and affect existing or future land uses located within or surrounding the Specific Plan area,
including sensitive receptors such as residences and schools. Thus, this analysis broadly
addresses the potential for Project implementation to result in substantial emissions of criteria
pollutants.
Construction of projects facilitated by the Downtown Specific Plan Update would generate criteria
pollutant emissions throughout the implementation period through 2040. This does not mean that
all facilitated projects would be under construction simultaneously until 2040; the City
conservatively estimates that a maximum 10 percent of buildout allowed under the Project could
be under construction in any given year, but there are also likely to be periods in which no
construction occurs. The exact location and types of development are not known, but the general
location and types of development can be reasonably anticipated. For example, projects would
likely be concentrated along Main Street and would consist mainly of low-rise or mid-rise
buildings, in accordance with existing and proposed site-
districts. Construction would involve phases such as demolition, grading, building construction,
13
paving, and architectural coating activities. Fugitive dust (PM) emissions would typically be
10
greatest during demolition and grading activities due to the disturbance of soils and debris. NO
X
and other emissions would result from the combustion of diesel fuels used to power off-road
construction vehicles (e.g., backhoes, bulldozers, etc.) and trucks. Worker, vendor, and other
13
The Specific Plan area is highly urbanized and does not contain natural lands that would involve
the types of land clearing activities (e.g., grubbing, tree/stump removal, etc.) associated with site
preparation assumptions in CalEEMod.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
construction-related vehicle trips would also generate criteria pollutant emissions. The magnitude
of construction emissions and their impacts to sensitive receptors would be dependent on project-
specific factors that are not known at this time (e.g., proximity to sensitive receptors, the types
and quantity of equipment utilized by projects, the number of construction vehicle trips generated
by projects, etc.), but given the allowable uses and typical construction activities, as well as
ugitive dust, it is nevertheless possible to conservatively estimate
construction emissions and assess the significance of construction emissions that would be
associated with construction of projects facilitated by the Downtown Specific Plan Update. As
noted earlier, the City conservatively estimates that a maximum 10 percent of buildout allowed
under the Project could be under construction in any given year (see Table 5).
Table 5
Specific Plan Buildout, Average, and Worst-Case Construction Estimates
Total Allowable Worst-Case Year
Average Year
Land Use Land Use Increase (10% of Full
(For 25 years)
A
(Full Buildout)Buildout)
Retail and Restaurant 130,000 sf 5,200 sf 13,000 sf
Office 200,000 sf 8,000 sf 20,000 sf
Medical Office 24,000 sf 960 sf 2,400 sf
Residential 300 units 12 units 30 units
Notes:
A
The buildout values in this table do not represent the total development square footage that would
footage that could be constructed by 2040. The values do not include remodeling of existing buildings
and transportation/mobility enhancements (e.g., pedestrian crossing enhancements, bus stop
improvements, signal operation enhancements, etc), which would not result in significant
construction emissions.
sf = square feet
Source: NTEC, 2023.
Emissions associated with the construction of these uses were estimated using CalEEMod
version 2022, which draws on extensive construction survey data of construction equipment
usage, construction equipment emissions, construction phase lengths, and other factors. Since
multiple projects may occur at the same time, all construction phases were conservatively
assumed to overlap. Construction emissions were estimated based on activity in year 2024. Due
to the changeover in construction fleets as older equipment is replaced with newer, cleaner
equipment, it is anticipated that maximum daily emissions would decrease as development occurs
14
beyond 2024.
Modeled construction emissions are shown below in Table 6. Regional thresholds and LSTs for
each air pollutant are also shown for comparison. As noted earlier, LSTs for a two-acre project
14
For example, according to CARB, Tier 0 (uncontrolled), Tier 1, and Tier 2 off-road diesel vehicles
make up one third of the statewide fleet reported to CARB but contributed to 60 percent of NO
X
-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled
Fleets Regulation would phase out this equipment in large fleets by 2028, medium fleets by 2030,
and small fleets by 2032, substantially reducing NO and PM emissions.
X
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
size were conservatively utilized based on the area of the estimated uses, but it is more likely that
construction projects would be spread across the 43.8-acre Specific Plan area and not
concentrated in a single two-acre location.
construction emissions would not exceed SCAQMD regional significance thresholds for VOC,
NO, CO, SOPM, or PM. Local emissions also would not exceed SCAQMD LSTs for NO,
XX, 102.5X
CO, PM, or PM-related emissions impacts on regional
102.5
and localized air quality would be less than significant.
Table 6
Maximum Regional and Localized Daily Construction Emissions
Emissions in lbs per day
VOC NOCO SO PM PM
X x102.5
Regional Emissions
Summer 2024 27.6 52.6 56.9 0.11 8.03 3.69
Winter 2024 27.6 52.9 56.0 0.11 8.03 3.69
Maximum Regional Emissions 27.6 52.9 56.9 0.11 8.03 3.69
Regional Daily Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No
Localized Emissions
Demolition 1.61 15.6 16.0 0.02 2.5 0.90
Grading 1.65 15.9 15.4 0.02 2.58 1.57
Building Construction 1.13 9.44 10.1 0.02 0.37 0.34
Paving 0.53 4.90 6.53 0.01 0.23 0.21
Architectural Coating 22.25 0.91 1.15 <0.01 0.03 0.03
Maximum Combined Emissions 27.17 46.75 49.18 0.07 5.71 3.05
Localized Significance Threshold- 131 967 - 8 5
Exceed Threshold? - No No - No No
Source: NTEC, 2023.
5.2.2 Operations Emissions
As explained earlier and shown in Table 5, implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan Update
would allow for an additional 130,000 square feet of retail and restaurant land uses, 200,000
square feet of office space, 24,000 square feet of medical office space, and 300 residential units
within the Specific Plan area. Emissions associated with these additional uses were also
calculated using CalEEMod version 2022. Three scenarios were modeled, each of which
assumes full buildout of these allowable uses: 2024, 2030, and 2040. The 2024 buildout scenario
is hypothetical and shown for informational purposes: reasonably, full buildout would not occur by
2024. The 2030 scenario represents an aggressive scenario in which full buildout occurs by 2030,
which is also unlikely but nonetheless plausible. The 2040 scenario demonstrates what emissions
and (2) that operational emi
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
As shown below in Table 7, even under the 2024
scenario , CO, PM, and
X10
PM or LSTs for NO, CO, PM, and PM. The only potential exceedance shown is for regional
2.5X102.5
VOC emissions during the 2024 scenario, but, as explained earlier, the 2024 buildout scenario is
a hypothetical scenario with no potential to occur because full buildout could not be achieved by
2024. If buildout occurs by 2030 (a conservative assumption), declines in VOC emissions from
threshold for this pollutant. VOC emissions would continue to decline through 2040 due to ongoing
reductions in VOC emissions from vehicle fleets. This decline also highlights the second point,
which is that emissions associated with the Project especially VOC, NO, and CO emissions
X
would decline over time primarily due to declining emissions from the mobile source sector, which
can be attributed to factors such as the increasing penetration of newer vehicles with better
efficiency and exhaust emission control systems in the statewide fleet, and the increasing share
of electric vehicles (EVs) within the statewide fleet. Declines in area and energy-related emissions
would also be expected to occur as the State transitions away from natural gas appliances and
as electricity providers (such as Southern California Edison) transition to 100 percent clean
energy, but the effect of these transitions is not accounted for in the CalEEMod criteria pollutant
would be below SCAQMD regional thresholds and LSTs and therefore less than significant.
Table 7
Regional and Localized Operational Emissions
Emissions in lbs per day
Emissions Source
VOC NOCO SO PM PM
x x102.5
Full Buildout 2024
Mobile38.6 37.3 385 0.88 78.7 20.4
Area 19.2 0.30 32.3 <0.01 0.04 0.03
Energy 0.14 2.58 1.81 0.02 0.20 0.20
A
Total Regional Emissions:58.039.9 419 0.90 79.0 20.6
Full Buildout 2030
Mobile 29.3 24.2 289 0.78 78.5 20.2
Area 19.1 0.29 32.5 <0.01 0.04 0.03
Energy 0.14 2.58 1.81 0.02 0.20 0.20
A
Total Regional Emissions:48.6 26.8 323 0.79 78.7 20.4
Full Buildout - 2040
Mobile 22.6 16.4 232 0.69 78.2 20.0
Area 19.1 0.29 32.5 <0.01 0.03 0.03
Energy 0.14 2.58 1.81 0.02 0.20 0.20
A
Total Regional Emissions: 41.9 19.0 266 0.70 78.4 20.2
B
Maximum Regional Emissions 58.039.9 419 0.90 79.0 20.6
Regional Daily Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55
B
Exceed Thresholds?NoNo No No No No
Localized Emissions
Full Buildout 2024 19.34 2.88 34.11 0.02 0.24 0.23
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
Full Buildout 2030 19.24 2.87 34.31 0.02 0.24 0.23
Full Buildout 2040 19.24 2.87 34.31 0.02 0.23 0.23
Maximum Localized Emissions 19.34 2.88 34.31 0.02 0.24 0.23
Localized Significant Thresholds - 91 664 - 1 1
Exceed Threshold? - No No - No No
Note:
A
Some emissions may not add up due to rounding and differences between summer and winter
emissions.
B
See discussion regarding VOC emissions. The 2024 full buildout scenario represents a hypothetical
scenario. VOC emissions resultant from Project operations would be below SCAQMD thresholds.
Source: NTEC, 2023.
5.2.3 Criteria Pollutant Emissions Summary Health Impact
SCAQMD regional thresholds and LSTs. And as discussed earlier, these SCAQMD thresholds
represent the maximum emissions that would not be expected to cause or materially contribute
to an exceedance of NAAQS or CAAQS, which themselves represent the maximum
concentrations of criteria pollutants that can be present in outdoor air without any harmful effects
struction nor operations
emissions of criteria pollutants would be expected to cause or measurably contribute to adverse
on regional and localized air quality would be less than significant.
Emissions and health impacts due to non-criteria pollutants such as TACs are discussed in the
following section.
5.3 Threshold c):
Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
5.3.1 Construction Emissions
As discussed previously-related criteria pollutant emissions would not
exceed SCAQMD regional significance thresholds. Construction-related criteria pollutant
emissions also would not exceed SCAQMD LSTs, meaning that nearby sensitive receptors
generally located within 25 meters or farther from construction sites would not be exposed to
substantial criteria pollutant concentrations that would present a public health concern.
The primary TAC that would be generated by construction activities is diesel PM, which would be
emitted from the exhaust pipes of diesel-powered construction vehicles and equipment.
Construction activities emitting diesel PM would occur intermittently over the approximately 25-
year buildout period associated with the Specific Plan. Further, development projects would be
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
scattered throughout the 43.8-acre Specific Plan area and not consistently located adjacent to or
15
near a specific sensitive receptor. Thus, the previously identified sensitive receptors would only
be exposed to construction-related DPM emissions for a fraction of the approximately 25-year
buildout period. Because individual cancer risk is based on exposure to concentrations of TACs
over a 30-year period, the likelihood that exposure of individuals to TAC concentrations resultant
cer risks is low.
construction activities, which include exhaust PM, would not exceed applicable regional
16
thresholds and LSTs. Given these considerations, construction-related TAC emissions are
expected to result in less than significant health risk impacts.
5.3.2 Operations Emissions
As discussed previously, criteria pollutant emissions would not exceed
SCAQMD regional significance thresholds or LSTs.
The Project does not propose sources of acutely and chronically hazardous TACs, such as
industrial manufacturing processes, automotive repair facilities, or warehouse distribution
facilities. Neither CARB nor the SCAQMD identify the types of retail, commercial, office, and
residential uses proposed by the Project as sources of substantial TAC emissions. As a result,
the operations of these uses would not warrant the need for a health risk assessment, and this
TAC-related impact would be less than significant.
Regarding CO Hotspots: though the Project would generate traffic that produces and contributes
to off-site CO emissions, Project traffic generation would not result in exceedances of CO air
quality standards at nearby roadways due to three key factors. First, CO hotspots are rare and
only occur in the presence of unusual atmospheric conditions and extremely cold conditions,
neither of which applies to the Project area. Second, auto-related emissions of CO continue to
decline because of advances in fuel combustion technology and the increasing penetration of this
technology in the vehicle fleet. As shown earlier in Table 2, CO levels in the Project area are well-
below federal and state standards, as are CO levels in the air basin itself. No exceedances of CO
have been recorded at nearby monitoring stations for some time, and the air basin is currently
designated as a CO attainment area for both CAAQS and NAAQS. Finally, the Project would not
contribute to the levels of congestion and emissions necessary to trigger a potential CO hotspot.
as a result of CO hotspots would be less than significant.
15
For example, one project may be located within 100 feet of a sensitive receptor, and another
project may be located 1,000 feet from that same sensitive receptor.
16
It is additionally worth reiterating the conservative nature of that analysis, which assumes that 10
percent of Project buildout would be constructed at once, and that every construction phase
associated with buildout would occur simultaneously. Thus, the PM emissions estimated by that
analysis can be considered conservative, worst-case estimates.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality Study
5.4 Threshold d):
Would the project result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number
of people?
Land uses associated with odor complaints include agricultural operations, wastewater treatment
plans, landfills, food processing facilities, and certain industrial operations (such as manufacturing
uses that produce chemicals, paper, etc.). The Project does not involve such land uses.
number of people would be less than significant.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Appendix
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Project
!
1 /31
2 /31
3 /31
4 /31
Description—
Population—
SpecialLandscapeArea(sqft)—
LandscapeArea(sqft)0.00
ValueDowntownSPUpdate-ConstructionOnly(Summer)7/1/2024—Plan/communityCounty3.5017.633.92134258270639,-118.41595830576219LosAngeles-SouthCoastElSegundoSouthCoastAQMDSouthCoast45347SouthernCaliforniaEd
isonSouthernCaliforniaGas2022.1.1.19
5 /31
BuildingArea(sqft)13,000
LotAcreage0.30
Unit1000sqft
Size13.0
DataFieldProjectNameConstructionStartDateLeadAgencyLandUseScaleAnalysisLevelforDefaultsWindspeed(m/s)Precipitation(days)LocationCountyCityAirDistrictAirBasinTAZEDFZElectricUtilityGasUtilityAppVersion
LandUseSubtypeStripMall
1.BasicProjectInformation
CO2e—13,977—2,556—1,598—265
R—15.4—0.07—0.74—0.12
———
N2O—0.86—0.07—0.07—0.01
CH4—0.60—0.10—0.07—0.01
——89.0
CO2T—13,692—2,533—1,573—260
NBCO2—13,692—2,533—1,573—260
———
BCO2————————
PM2.5T—3.69—0.47—0.36—0.07
0.000.000.00
PM2.5D—1.74—0.12—0.14—0.03
6 /31
PM2.5E—1.95—0.35—0.22—0.04
20,0002,40028,800
PM10T—8.03—0.88—0.75—0.14
PM10D—5.92—0.51—0.51—0.09
0.460.060.79
PM10E—2.11—0.37—0.24—0.04
SO2—0.11—0.02—0.01—<0.005
1000sqft1000sqftDwellingUnit
CO—56.9—12.4—6.99—1.28
NOx—52.6—9.98—6.13—1.12
20.02.4030.0
ROG—27.6—1.29—2.10—0.38
TOG—6.74—1.55—0.86—0.16
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseUn/Mit.Daily,Summer(Max)Unmit.Daily,Winter(Max)Unmit.AverageDaily(Max)Unmit.Annual(Max)Unmit.
Nomeasuresselected 2.EmissionsSummary
CO2e—13,9772,568—2,5562,543—1,598469—26577.7CO2e——
R—15.42.45—0.070.06—0.740.19—0.120.03R——
N2O—0.860.07—0.070.07—0.070.01—0.01<0.005N2O——
CH4—0.600.10—0.100.10—0.070.02—0.01<0.005CH4——
CO2T—13,6922,542—2,5332,519—1,573464—26076.9CO2T——
NBCO2—13,6922,542—2,5332,519—1,573464—26076.9NBCO2——
BCO2————————————BCO2——
PM2.5T—3.690.43—0.470.43—0.360.08—0.070.01PM2.5T——
PM2.5D—1.740.12—0.120.12—0.140.02—0.03<0.005PM2.5D——
7 /31
PM2.5E—1.950.30—0.350.30—0.220.06—0.040.01PM2.5E——
PM10T—8.030.84—0.880.84—0.750.15—0.140.03PM10T——
PM10D—5.920.51—0.510.51—0.510.09—0.090.02PM10D——
PM10E—2.110.33—0.370.33—0.240.06—0.040.01PM10E——
SO2—0.110.02—0.020.02—0.01<0.005—<0.005<0.005SO2——
CO—56.912.5—12.412.1—6.992.25—1.280.41CO——
NOx—52.69.41—9.989.44—6.131.74—1.120.32NOx——
ROG—27.61.22—1.291.21—2.100.22—0.380.04ROG——
TOG—6.741.46—1.551.46—0.860.27—0.160.05TOG——
YearDaily-Summer(Max)20242025Daily-Winter(Max)20242025AverageDaily20242025Annual20242025LocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)
3.ConstructionEmissionsDetails
2,502—0.00——158—0.00—26.1—0.00——1790.004,705
——0.00————0.00———0.00——0.700.0010.4
0.02—0.00——<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.010.000.72
0.10—0.00——0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.010.000.22
2,494—0.00——157—0.00—26.0—0.00——1760.004,475
2,494—0.00——157—0.00—26.0—0.00——1760.004,475
—————————————————
0.620.280.00——0.040.020.00—0.01<0.0050.00——0.040.000.38
—0.280.00———0.020.00——<0.0050.00——0.040.000.33
8 /31
0.62—0.00——0.04—0.00—0.01—0.00——0.000.000.06
0.671.830.00——0.040.120.00—0.010.020.00——0.160.001.25
—1.830.00———0.120.00——0.020.00——0.160.001.19
0.67—0.00——0.04—0.00—0.01—0.00——0.000.000.06
0.02—0.00——<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.03
16.0—0.00——1.01—0.00—0.18—0.00——0.940.001.84
15.6—0.00——0.98—0.00—0.18—0.00——0.060.005.21
1.61—0.00——0.10—0.00—0.02—0.00——0.060.000.08
1.92—0.00——0.12—0.00—0.02—0.00——0.060.000.30
Off-RoadEquipmentDemolitionOnsitetruckDaily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentDemolitionOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentDemolitionOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)WorkerVendorHauling
——10.80.00296—1.800.0049.0CO2e——2,462—0.00—
——0.020.000.28—<0.0050.000.05R————0.00—
——<0.0050.000.05—<0.0050.000.01N2O——0.02—0.00—
——<0.0050.000.01—<0.0050.00<0.005CH4——0.10—0.00—
——10.70.00282—1.770.0046.7CO2T——2,454—0.00—
——10.70.00282—1.770.0046.7NBCO2——2,454—0.00—
—————————BCO2——————
——<0.0050.000.02—<0.0050.00<0.005PM2.5T——0.680.890.00—
——<0.0050.000.02—<0.0050.00<0.005PM2.5D———0.890.00—
9 /31
——0.000.00<0.005—0.000.00<0.005PM2.5E——0.68—0.00—
——0.010.000.08—<0.0050.000.01PM10T——0.741.840.00—
——0.010.000.07—<0.0050.000.01PM10D———1.840.00—
——0.000.00<0.005—0.000.00<0.005PM10E——0.74—0.00—
——0.000.00<0.005—0.000.00<0.005SO2——0.02—0.00—
——0.050.000.11—0.010.000.02CO——15.4—0.00—
——<0.0050.000.35—<0.0050.000.06NOx——15.9—0.00—
——<0.0050.00<0.005—<0.0050.00<0.005ROG——1.65—0.00—
——<0.0050.000.02—<0.0050.00<0.005TOG——1.96—0.00—
Daily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckDaily,Winter(Max)
—155—0.00—25.7—0.00——1430.000.00——8.680.00
———0.00———0.00——0.560.000.00——0.020.00
—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——<0.0050.000.00——<0.0050.00
—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.010.000.00——<0.0050.00
—155—0.00—25.6—0.00——1410.000.00——8.560.00
—155—0.00—25.6—0.00——1410.000.00——8.560.00
—————————————————
—0.040.060.00—0.010.010.00——0.030.000.00——<0.0050.00
——0.060.00——0.010.00——0.030.000.00——<0.0050.00
10 /31
—0.04—0.00—0.01—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.00
—0.050.120.00—0.010.020.00——0.130.000.00——0.010.00
——0.120.00——0.020.00——0.130.000.00——0.010.00
—0.05—0.00—0.01—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.00
—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.00
—0.97—0.00—0.18—0.00——0.750.000.00——0.040.00
—1.00—0.00—0.18—0.00——0.050.000.00——<0.0050.00
—0.10—0.00—0.02—0.00——0.040.000.00——<0.0050.00
—0.12—0.00—0.02—0.00——0.050.000.00——<0.0050.00
AverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingDaily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyWorke
rVendor
0.00—1.440.000.00CO2e——1,8070.00—1,8070.00—6510.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00R———0.00——0.00——0.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00N2O——0.010.00—0.010.00—0.010.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00CH4——0.070.00—0.070.00—0.030.00—
0.00—1.420.000.00CO2T——1,8010.00—1,8010.00—6490.00—
0.00—1.420.000.00NBCO2——1,8010.00—1,8010.00—6490.00—
—————BCO2———————————
0.00—<0.0050.000.00PM2.5T——0.340.00—0.340.00—0.120.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00PM2.5D———0.00——0.00——0.00—
11 /31
0.00—0.000.000.00PM2.5E——0.340.00—0.340.00—0.120.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00PM10T——0.370.00—0.370.00—0.130.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00PM10D———0.00——0.00——0.00—
0.00—0.000.000.00PM10E——0.370.00—0.370.00—0.130.00—
0.00—0.000.000.00SO2——0.020.00—0.020.00—0.010.00—
0.00—0.010.000.00CO——10.10.00—10.10.00—3.640.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00NOx——9.440.00—9.440.00—3.400.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00ROG——1.130.00—1.130.00—0.410.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00TOG——1.360.00—1.360.00—0.490.00—
HaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckDaily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAnnual
1080.00——4723040.00—4463030.00—1631090.00—27.018.10.00CO2e
—0.00——1.830.790.00—0.050.020.00—0.280.120.00—0.050.020.00R
<0.0050.00——0.020.040.00—0.020.040.00—0.010.010.00—<0.005<0.0050.00N2O
<0.0050.00——0.020.010.00—0.020.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00—<0.005<0.0050.00CH4
1070.00——4652910.00—4412910.00—1611050.00—26.717.30.00CO2T
1070.00——4652910.00—4412910.00—1611050.00—26.717.30.00NBCO2
———————————————————BCO2
0.020.00——0.100.030.00—0.100.030.00—0.040.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00PM2.5T
—0.00——0.100.020.00—0.100.020.00—0.040.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00PM2.5D
12 /31
0.020.00——0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00PM2.5E
0.020.00——0.430.080.00—0.430.080.00—0.150.030.00—0.030.010.00PM10T
—0.00——0.430.080.00—0.430.080.00—0.150.030.00—0.030.010.00PM10D
0.020.00——0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00PM10E
<0.0050.00——0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00SO2
0.660.00——2.480.170.00—2.100.170.00—0.800.060.00—0.150.010.00CO
0.620.00——0.160.340.00—0.190.360.00—0.070.130.00—0.010.020.00NOx
0.070.00——0.150.010.00—0.150.010.00—0.05<0.0050.00—0.01<0.0050.00ROG
0.090.00——0.160.020.00—0.160.020.00—0.060.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00TOG
Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingDaily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocation
——1,8070.00—1,8070.00—3320.00—55.00.00——4622990.00
———0.00——0.00——0.00——0.00——1.670.780.00
——0.010.00—0.010.00—<0.0050.00—<0.0050.00——0.020.040.00
——0.070.00—0.070.00—0.010.00—<0.0050.00——0.020.010.00
——1,8010.00—1,8010.00—3310.00—54.90.00——4552860.00
——1,8010.00—1,8010.00—3310.00—54.90.00——4552860.00
——————————————————
——0.300.00—0.300.00—0.060.00—0.010.00——0.100.020.00
———0.00——0.00——0.00——0.00——0.100.020.00
13 /31
——0.300.00—0.300.00—0.060.00—0.010.00——0.00<0.0050.00
——0.330.00—0.330.00—0.060.00—0.010.00——0.430.080.00
———0.00——0.00——0.00——0.00——0.430.080.00
——0.330.00—0.330.00—0.060.00—0.010.00——0.00<0.0050.00
——0.020.00—0.020.00—<0.0050.00—<0.0050.00——0.00<0.0050.00
——10.00.00—10.00.00—1.850.00—0.340.00——2.290.160.00
——8.950.00—8.950.00—1.650.00—0.300.00——0.140.320.00
——1.070.00—1.070.00—0.200.00—0.040.00——0.140.010.00
——1.280.00—1.280.00—0.240.00—0.040.00——0.160.020.00
OnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckDaily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Worke
rVendorHauling
—4372980.00—81.654.90.00—13.59.090.00CO2e——995—0.00
—0.040.020.00—0.130.060.00—0.020.010.00R————0.00
—0.020.040.00—<0.0050.010.00—<0.005<0.0050.00N2O——0.01—0.00
—0.020.010.00—<0.005<0.0050.00—<0.005<0.0050.00CH4——0.04—0.00
—4322860.00—80.652.60.00—13.38.710.00CO2T——992—0.00
—4322860.00—80.652.60.00—13.38.710.00NBCO2——992—0.00
————————————BCO2—————
—0.100.020.00—0.02<0.0050.00—<0.005<0.0050.00PM2.5T——0.21—0.00
—0.100.020.00—0.02<0.0050.00—<0.005<0.0050.00PM2.5D————0.00
14 /31
—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00PM2.5E——0.21—0.00
—0.430.080.00—0.080.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00PM10T——0.23—0.00
—0.430.080.00—0.080.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00PM10D————0.00
—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00PM10E——0.23—0.00
—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00SO2——0.01—0.00
—1.940.160.00—0.380.030.00—0.070.010.00CO——6.53—0.00
—0.160.340.00—0.030.060.00—0.010.010.00NOx——4.90—0.00
—0.140.010.00—0.03<0.0050.00—<0.005<0.0050.00ROG——0.530.000.00
—0.160.020.00—0.03<0.0050.00—0.01<0.0050.00TOG——0.63—0.00
Daily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentPavingOnsitetruck
——27.3—0.00—4.51—0.00——1790.000.00——4.710.000.00—
————0.00———0.00——0.700.000.00——0.010.000.00—
——<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.010.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
——<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.010.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
——27.2—0.00—4.50—0.00——1760.000.00——4.650.000.00—
——27.2—0.00—4.50—0.00——1760.000.00——4.650.000.00—
————————————————————
——0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.040.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
————0.00———0.00——0.040.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
15 /31
——0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.000.00—
——0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.160.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
————0.00———0.00——0.160.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
——0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.000.00—
——<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.000.00—
——0.18—0.00—0.03—0.00——0.940.000.00——0.020.000.00—
——0.13—0.00—0.02—0.00——0.060.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
——0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00——0.060.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
——0.02—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.060.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
Daily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentPavingOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentPavingOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingDaily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnua
l
0.780.000.00CO2e——134—0.00——8.44—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00R————0.00————0.00—
<0.0050.000.00N2O——<0.005—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00CH4——0.01—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
0.770.000.00CO2T——134—0.00——8.41—0.00—
0.770.000.00NBCO2——134—0.00——8.41—0.00—
———BCO2———————————
<0.0050.000.00PM2.5T——0.03—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00PM2.5D————0.00————0.00—
16 /31
0.000.000.00PM2.5E——0.03—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00PM10T——0.03—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00PM10D————0.00————0.00—
0.000.000.00PM10E——0.03—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
0.000.000.00SO2——<0.005—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00CO——1.15—0.00——0.07—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00NOx——0.91—0.00——0.06—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00ROG——0.1422.10.00——0.011.390.00—
<0.0050.000.00TOG——0.17—0.00——0.01—0.00—
WorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckDaily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckAnnual
1.40—0.00——94.40.000.00——5.710.000.00—0.950.000.00
——0.00——0.370.000.00——0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
<0.005—0.00——<0.0050.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
<0.005—0.00——<0.0050.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
1.39—0.00——93.00.000.00——5.640.000.00—0.930.000.00
1.39—0.00——93.00.000.00——5.640.000.00—0.930.000.00
—————————————————
<0.005—0.00——0.020.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
——0.00——0.020.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
17 /31
<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
<0.005—0.00——0.090.000.00——0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
——0.00——0.090.000.00——0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.01—0.00——0.500.000.00——0.030.000.00—0.010.000.00
0.01—0.00——0.030.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
<0.0050.250.00——0.030.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
<0.005—0.00——0.030.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
Off-RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingDaily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHauling
4.OperationsEmissionsDetails
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
18 /31
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
VegetationDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e———————————————————
R———————————————————
N2O———————————————————
CH4———————————————————
CO2T———————————————————
NBCO2———————————————————
BCO2———————————————————
PM2.5T———————————————————
PM2.5D———————————————————
19 /31
PM2.5E———————————————————
PM10T———————————————————
PM10D———————————————————
PM10E———————————————————
SO2———————————————————
CO———————————————————
NOx———————————————————
ROG———————————————————
TOG———————————————————
SpeciesDaily,Summer(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—Daily,Winter(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—AnnualAvoidedSubtotal
—————
—————
LoadFactor0.370.400.730.41
PhaseDescription—————
—————
—————
Horsepower84.036733.0148
—————
WorkDaysperPhase23.023.020010.023.0
—————
—————
HoursPerDay8.008.008.008.00
—————
DaysPerWeek5.005.005.005.005.00
—————
NumberperDay3.001.001.001.00
20 /31
—————
EndDate7/31/20247/31/20244/4/20257/12/20247/31/2024
—————
EngineTierAverageAverageAverageAverage
—————
—————
StartDate7/1/20247/1/20247/1/20247/1/20247/1/2024
—————
FuelTypeDieselDieselDieselDiesel
—————
—————
PhaseTypeDemolitionGradingBuildingConstructionPavingArchitecturalCoating
EquipmentTypeTractors/Loaders/BackhoesRubberTiredDozersConcrete/IndustrialSawsGraders
—————
—————
SequestSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—PhaseNameDemolitionGradingBuildingConstructionPavingArchitecturalCoatingPhaseNameDemolitionDemolitionDemolitionGrading
5.ActivityData
0.370.400.290.200.740.370.450.370.420.360.380.560.48
VehicleMix—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2
84.036736782.014.084.046.084.081.089.036.010.037.0
7.008.006.006.008.006.008.008.006.008.007.006.006.00
MilesperTrip—18.510.240.0——18.5
2.001.001.001.001.001.003.001.001.001.001.001.001.00
21 /31
One-WayTripsperDay—12.5—32.1——10.0
AverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverage
DieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDiesel
TripType—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck—Worker
Tractors/Loaders/BackhoesRubberTiredDozersCranesForkliftsGeneratorSetsTractors/Loaders/BackhoesWeldersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesPaversPavingEquipmentRollersCementandMortarMixersAirCompressors
GradingGradingBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionPavingPavingPavingPavingPavingArchitecturalCoatingPhaseNameDemolitionDemolitionDemoli
tionDemolitionDemolitionGradingGrading
HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT
PM2.5Reduction55%44%9%
10.220.0——18.510.220.0——18.510.220.0——18.510.220.0—
22 /31
—0.00——32.99.010.00——12.5—0.00——6.59—0.00—
PM10Reduction55%44%9%
VendorHaulingOnsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck
GradingGradingGradingBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionPavingPavingPavingPavingPavingArchitecturalCoatingArchitecturalCoatingArchitec
turalCoatingArchitecturalCoatingArchitecturalCoatingControlStrategiesAppliedWaterunpavedroadstwicedailyLimitvehiclespeedsonunpavedroadsto25mphSweeppavedroadsoncepermonth
ParkingAreaCoated(sqft)—AcresPaved(acres)——0.00
PM2.5Reduction74%36%
Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)17,700MaterialDemolished(BuildingSquareFootage)64,2000.000.00%Asphalt0%0%0%0%
Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)53,100AcresGraded(acres)0.0023.00.00PM10Reduction74%36%
23 /31
ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)19,440MaterialExported(cy)0.00—0.00AreaPaved(acres)0.000.000.00—
Frequency(perday)32
ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)58,320MaterialImported(cy)0.00—0.00
PhaseNameArchitecturalCoatingPhaseNameDemolitionGradingPavingControlStrategiesAppliedWaterExposedAreaWaterDemolishedAreaLandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRise
N2O<0.005<0.005
FinalAcresNaturalGasSaved(btu/year)
FinalAcres
CH40.030.03
InitialAcresElectricitySaved(kWh/year)
24 /31
CO2532532
InitialAcres
VegetationSoilTypeNumber
kWhperYear0.000.00
Year20242025VegetationLandUseTypeBiomassCoverTypeTreeType
6.ClimateRiskDetailedReport
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Unitannualdaysofextremeheatannualdayswithprecipitationabove20mmmetersofinundationdepthannualhectaresburned
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
25 /31
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectLocation0.000.000.000.00
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityD
egradation
Cal-Adaptmidcentury2040–2059averageprojectionsforfourhazardsarereportedbelowforyourprojectlocation.TheseareunderRepresentationConcentrationPathway(RCP)8.5whichassumesGHGemissionswillcontinuetorisestr
onglythrough2050andthenplateauaround2100.TemperatureandExtremeHeatdataareforgridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Theprojectionisbasedonthe98thhistoricalpercentileofdailymaximum/minimumtemperaturesfro
mobservedhistoricaldata(32climatemodelensemblefromCal-Adapt,2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5). Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.ExtremePrecipitationdataareforthegridcellinwhichyour
projectarelocated.Thethresholdof20mmisequivalenttoabout¾aninchofrain,whichwouldbelighttomoderaterainfallifreceivedoverafulldayorheavyrainifreceivedoveraperiodof2to4hours.Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)
by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.SeaLevelRisedataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromRadkeetal.(2017),asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderdifferent
incrementsofsealevelrisecoupledwithextremestormevents.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialinundationdepthforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpec
tedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis50meters(m)by50m,ora
bout164feet(ft)by164ft.Wildfiredataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromUCDavis,asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderhistoricaldataofclimate,veg
etation,populationdensity,andlarge(>400ha)firehistory.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialwildfireprobabilitiesforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsabou
texpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km
)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestex
posure.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectCensusTract—32.172.095.6
26 /31
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradationIndicatorExposureIndicatorsAQ-OzoneAQ-PMAQ-DPM
Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectreferstoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.The
overallvulnerabilityscoresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresdonotincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.Thesensitivityscorereflects
theextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectreferstoitsabilityto
manageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalculatedbasedonthe
potentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.7.HealthandEquityDetails ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,grea
terthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
8.9548.90.0089.962.7—58.669.298.758.739.0—12.822.019.6—6.5233.24.5923.758.4ResultforProjectCensusTract—82.8564096
27 /31
DrinkingWaterLeadRiskHousingPesticidesToxicReleasesTrafficEffectIndicatorsCleanUpSitesGroundwaterHazWasteFacilities/GeneratorsImpairedWaterBodiesSolidWasteSensitivePopulationAsthmaCardio-vascularLowB
irthWeightsSocioeconomicFactorIndicatorsEducationHousingLinguisticPovertyUnemploymentIndicatorEconomicAbovePoverty
ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
92.634415571.46156807—79.8280508110035.76286411—74.5797510669.25445913—91.0817400257.05119979—23.3286282681.3550622445.617862182.3995893754.632362376—17.6825356176.697035878.7373283795.3933016859.348
13294—73.784165280.0
28 /31
EmployedMedianHIEducationBachelor'sorhigherHighschoolenrollmentPreschoolenrollmentTransportationAutoAccessActivecommutingSocial2-parenthouseholdsVotingNeighborhoodAlcoholavailabilityParkaccessRetaild
ensitySupermarketaccessTreecanopyHousingHomeownershipHousinghabitabilityLow-inchomeownerseverehousingcostburdenLow-increnterseverehousingcostburdenUncrowdedhousingHealthOutcomesInsuredadultsArthritis
84.50.00.00.00.00.00.068.887.280.265.40.00.00.019.60.00.0—0.00.00.0—0.00.031.069.378.4
29 /31
AsthmaERAdmissionsHighBloodPressureCancer(excludingskin)AsthmaCoronaryHeartDiseaseChronicObstructivePulmonaryDiseaseDiagnosedDiabetesLifeExpectancyatBirthCognitivelyDisabledPhysically
DisabledHeartAttackERAdmissionsMentalHealthNotGoodChronicKidneyDiseaseObesityPedestrianInjuriesPhysicalHealthNotGoodStrokeHealthRiskBehaviorsBingeDrinkingCurrentSmokerNoLeisureTimeforPhysicalActivit
yClimateChangeExposuresWildfireRiskSLRInundationAreaChildrenElderlyEnglishSpeaking
14.477.2—19.243.523.0—11.3—48.5ResultforProjectCensusTract26.079.0NoNoNo
30 /31
Foreign-bornOutdoorWorkersClimateChangeAdaptiveCapacityImperviousSurfaceCoverTrafficDensityTrafficAccessOtherIndicesHardshipOtherDecisionSupport2016VotingMetricCalEnviroScreen4.0ScoreforProjectLocati
on(a)HealthyPlacesIndexScoreforProjectLocation(b)ProjectLocatedinaDesignatedDisadvantagedCommunity(SenateBill535)ProjectLocatedinaLow-IncomeCommunity(AssemblyBill1550)ProjectLocatedinaCommunityAirPro
tectionProgramCommunity(AssemblyBill617)
a:ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.b:ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greater
than50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.NoHealth&EquityMeasuresselected.Health&EquityEvaluationScorecardnotcompleted.NoHealth&EquityCustomMeasurescreated.
JustificationSeeNoteA.1SeeNoteA.2
31 /31
ScreenConstruction:ConstructionPhasesConstruction:TripsandVMT
8.UserChangestoDefaultData
1 /29
2 /29
3 /29
4 /29
Description—
Population—
SpecialLandscapeArea(sqft)—
LandscapeArea(sqft)0.00
ValueDowntownSPUpdate-ConstructionOnly(Winter)1/1/2024—Plan/communityCounty3.5017.633.92134258270639,-118.41595830576219LosAngeles-SouthCoastElSegundoSouthCoastAQMDSouthCoast45347SouthernCaliforniaEd
isonSouthernCaliforniaGas2022.1.1.19
5 /29
BuildingArea(sqft)13,000
LotAcreage0.30
Unit1000sqft
Size13.0
DataFieldProjectNameConstructionStartDateLeadAgencyLandUseScaleAnalysisLevelforDefaultsWindspeed(m/s)Precipitation(days)LocationCountyCityAirDistrictAirBasinTAZEDFZElectricUtilityGasUtilityAppVersion
LandUseSubtypeStripMall
1.BasicProjectInformation
CO2e—2,583—13,909—2,079—344
R—2.62—0.40—0.95—0.16
———
N2O—0.07—0.86—0.09—0.01
CH4—0.10—0.60—0.09—0.01
——89.0
CO2T—2,557—13,638—2,050—339
NBCO2—2,557—13,638—2,050—339
———
BCO2————————
PM2.5T—0.47—3.69—0.45—0.08
0.000.000.00
PM2.5D—0.12—1.74—0.17—0.03
6 /29
PM2.5E—0.35—1.95—0.28—0.05
20,0002,40028,800
PM10T—0.88—8.03—0.92—0.17
PM10D—0.51—5.92—0.61—0.11
0.460.060.79
PM10E—0.37—2.11—0.31—0.06
SO2—0.02—0.11—0.02—<0.005
1000sqft1000sqftDwellingUnit
CO—12.8—56.0—9.33—1.70
NOx—9.94—52.9—8.00—1.46
20.02.4030.0
ROG—1.29—27.6—2.34—0.43
TOG—1.55—6.73—1.15—0.21
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseUn/Mit.Daily,Summer(Max)Unmit.Daily,Winter(Max)Unmit.AverageDaily(Max)Unmit.Annual(Max)Unmit.
Nomeasuresselected 2.EmissionsSummary
CO2e—2,583—13,909—2,079—344CO2e———2,502
R—2.62—0.40—0.95—0.16R————
N2O—0.07—0.86—0.09—0.01N2O———0.02
CH4—0.10—0.60—0.09—0.01CH4———0.10
CO2T—2,557—13,638—2,050—339CO2T———2,494
NBCO2—2,557—13,638—2,050—339NBCO2———2,494
BCO2————————BCO2————
PM2.5T—0.47—3.69—0.45—0.08PM2.5T———0.62
PM2.5D—0.12—1.74—0.17—0.03PM2.5D————
7 /29
PM2.5E—0.35—1.95—0.28—0.05PM2.5E———0.62
PM10T—0.88—8.03—0.92—0.17PM10T———0.67
PM10D—0.51—5.92—0.61—0.11PM10D————
PM10E—0.37—2.11—0.31—0.06PM10E———0.67
SO2—0.02—0.11—0.02—<0.005SO2———0.02
CO—12.8—56.0—9.33—1.70CO———16.0
NOx—9.94—52.9—8.00—1.46NOx———15.6
ROG—1.29—27.6—2.34—0.43ROG———1.61
TOG—1.55—6.73—1.15—0.21TOG———1.92
YearDaily-Summer(Max)2024Daily-Winter(Max)2024AverageDaily2024Annual2024LocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipment
3.ConstructionEmissionsDetails
—0.00—158—0.00—26.1—0.00———1690.004,696—10.80.00
—0.00———0.00———0.00———0.020.000.27—0.020.00
—0.00—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.010.000.72—<0.0050.00
—0.00—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.010.000.22—<0.0050.00
—0.00—157—0.00—26.0—0.00———1670.004,476—10.70.00
—0.00—157—0.00—26.0—0.00———1670.004,476—10.70.00
———————————————————
0.280.00—0.040.020.00—0.01<0.0050.00———0.040.000.38—<0.0050.00
0.280.00——0.020.00——<0.0050.00———0.040.000.33—<0.0050.00
8 /29
—0.00—0.04—0.00—0.01—0.00———0.000.000.06—0.000.00
1.830.00—0.040.120.00—0.010.020.00———0.160.001.25—0.010.00
1.830.00——0.120.00——0.020.00———0.160.001.19—0.010.00
—0.00—0.04—0.00—0.01—0.00———0.000.000.06—0.000.00
—0.00—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.03—0.000.00
—0.00—1.01—0.00—0.18—0.00———0.800.001.82—0.050.00
—0.00—0.98—0.00—0.18—0.00———0.070.005.41—<0.0050.00
—0.00—0.10—0.00—0.02—0.00———0.060.000.08—<0.0050.00
—0.00—0.12—0.00—0.02—0.00———0.060.000.30—<0.0050.00
DemolitionOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentDemolitionOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentDemolitionOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAverageDailyWorkerVendor
296—1.800.0049.0CO2e———2,462—0.00—155—
0.28—<0.0050.000.05R—————0.00———
0.05—<0.0050.000.01N2O———0.02—0.00—<0.005—
0.01—<0.0050.00<0.005CH4———0.10—0.00—0.01—
282—1.770.0046.7CO2T———2,454—0.00—155—
282—1.770.0046.7NBCO2———2,454—0.00—155—
—————BCO2—————————
0.02—<0.0050.00<0.005PM2.5T———0.680.890.00—0.040.06
0.02—<0.0050.00<0.005PM2.5D————0.890.00——0.06
9 /29
<0.005—0.000.00<0.005PM2.5E———0.68—0.00—0.04—
0.08—<0.0050.000.01PM10T———0.741.840.00—0.050.12
0.07—<0.0050.000.01PM10D————1.840.00——0.12
<0.005—0.000.00<0.005PM10E———0.74—0.00—0.05—
<0.005—0.000.00<0.005SO2———0.02—0.00—<0.005—
0.11—0.010.000.02CO———15.4—0.00—0.97—
0.35—<0.0050.000.06NOx———15.9—0.00—1.00—
<0.005—<0.0050.00<0.005ROG———1.65—0.00—0.10—
0.02—<0.0050.00<0.005TOG———1.96—0.00—0.12—
HaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovement
0.00—25.7—0.00———1350.000.00—8.680.000.00—1.440.000.00
0.00———0.00———0.010.000.00—0.020.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—25.6—0.00———1340.000.00—8.560.000.00—1.420.000.00
0.00—25.6—0.00———1340.000.00—8.560.000.00—1.420.000.00
———————————————————
0.00—0.010.010.00———0.030.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00——0.010.00———0.030.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
10 /29
0.00—0.01—0.00———0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.00—0.010.020.00———0.130.000.00—0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00——0.020.00———0.130.000.00—0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—0.01—0.00———0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.00—0.18—0.00———0.640.000.00—0.040.000.00—0.010.000.00
0.00—0.18—0.00———0.060.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—0.02—0.00———0.040.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—0.02—0.00———0.050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
OnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHauling
CO2e——1,8070.00—1,8070.00—9900.00—1640.00—
R———0.00——0.00——0.00——0.00—
N2O——0.010.00—0.010.00—0.010.00—<0.0050.00—
CH4——0.070.00—0.070.00—0.040.00—0.010.00—
CO2T——1,8010.00—1,8010.00—9870.00—1630.00—
NBCO2——1,8010.00—1,8010.00—9870.00—1630.00—
BCO2——————————————
PM2.5T——0.340.00—0.340.00—0.190.00—0.030.00—
PM2.5D———0.00——0.00——0.00——0.00—
11 /29
PM2.5E——0.340.00—0.340.00—0.190.00—0.030.00—
PM10T——0.370.00—0.370.00—0.200.00—0.040.00—
PM10D———0.00——0.00——0.00——0.00—
PM10E——0.370.00—0.370.00—0.200.00—0.040.00—
SO2——0.020.00—0.020.00—0.010.00—<0.0050.00—
CO——10.10.00—10.10.00—5.540.00—1.010.00—
NOx——9.440.00—9.440.00—5.170.00—0.940.00—
ROG——1.130.00—1.130.00—0.620.00—0.110.00—
TOG——1.360.00—1.360.00—0.750.00—0.140.00—
LocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckDaily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckOffsite
—4723040.00—4463030.00—2481660.00—41.127.50.00CO2e——
—1.830.790.00—0.050.020.00—0.430.190.00—0.070.030.00R——
—0.020.040.00—0.020.040.00—0.010.020.00—<0.005<0.0050.00N2O——
—0.020.010.00—0.020.010.00—0.010.010.00—<0.005<0.0050.00CH4——
—4652910.00—4412910.00—2451590.00—40.626.40.00CO2T——
—4652910.00—4412910.00—2451590.00—40.626.40.00NBCO2——
————————————————BCO2——
—0.100.030.00—0.100.030.00—0.050.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00PM2.5T——
—0.100.020.00—0.100.020.00—0.050.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00PM2.5D——
12 /29
—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00PM2.5E——
—0.430.080.00—0.430.080.00—0.230.040.00—0.040.010.00PM10T——
—0.430.080.00—0.430.080.00—0.230.040.00—0.040.010.00PM10D——
—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00PM10E——
—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00SO2——
—2.480.170.00—2.100.170.00—1.210.090.00—0.220.020.00CO——
—0.160.340.00—0.190.360.00—0.100.200.00—0.020.040.00NOx——
—0.150.010.00—0.150.010.00—0.08<0.0050.00—0.01<0.0050.00ROG——
—0.160.020.00—0.160.020.00—0.090.010.00—0.02<0.0050.00TOG——
Daily,Summer(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingDaily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)
—995—0.00—27.3—0.00—4.51—0.00———1690.000.00—
———0.00———0.00———0.00———0.020.000.00—
—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.010.000.00—
—0.04—0.00—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.010.000.00—
—992—0.00—27.2—0.00—4.50—0.00———1670.000.00—
—992—0.00—27.2—0.00—4.50—0.00———1670.000.00—
———————————————————
—0.21—0.00—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.040.000.00—
———0.00———0.00———0.00———0.040.000.00—
13 /29
—0.21—0.00—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—
—0.23—0.00—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.160.000.00—
———0.00———0.00———0.00———0.160.000.00—
—0.23—0.00—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—
—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—
—6.53—0.00—0.18—0.00—0.03—0.00———0.800.000.00—
—4.90—0.00—0.13—0.00—0.02—0.00———0.070.000.00—
—0.530.000.00—0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00———0.060.000.00—
—0.63—0.00—0.02—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.060.000.00—
Daily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentPavingOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentPavingOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentPavingOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAv
erageDaily
4.710.000.00—0.780.000.00CO2e———134—0.00—8.44—
0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00R—————0.00———
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00N2O———<0.005—0.00—<0.005—
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00CH4———0.01—0.00—<0.005—
4.650.000.00—0.770.000.00CO2T———134—0.00—8.41—
4.650.000.00—0.770.000.00NBCO2———134—0.00—8.41—
———————BCO2—————————
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00PM2.5T———0.03—0.00—<0.005—
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00PM2.5D—————0.00———
14 /29
0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00PM2.5E———0.03—0.00—<0.005—
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00PM10T———0.03—0.00—<0.005—
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00PM10D—————0.00———
0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00PM10E———0.03—0.00—<0.005—
0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00SO2———<0.005—0.00—<0.005—
0.020.000.00—<0.0050.000.00CO———1.15—0.00—0.07—
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00NOx———0.91—0.00—0.06—
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00ROG———0.1422.10.00—0.011.39
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00TOG———0.17—0.00—0.01—
WorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatings
0.00—1.40—0.00———89.20.000.00—5.710.000.00—0.950.000.00
0.00———0.00———0.010.000.00—0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—1.39—0.00———88.10.000.00—5.640.000.00—0.930.000.00
0.00—1.39—0.00———88.10.000.00—5.640.000.00—0.930.000.00
———————————————————
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.020.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00———0.00———0.020.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
15 /29
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.090.000.00—0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00———0.00———0.090.000.00—0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.00—0.01—0.00———0.420.000.00—0.030.000.00—0.010.000.00
0.00—0.01—0.00———0.040.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.0050.250.00———0.030.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.030.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
OnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHauling
CO2e——————CO2e————
R——————R————
N2O——————N2O————
CH4——————CH4————
CO2T——————CO2T————
NBCO2——————NBCO2————
BCO2——————BCO2————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D————
16 /29
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E————
PM10T——————PM10T————
PM10D——————PM10D————
PM10E——————PM10E————
SO2——————SO2————
CO——————CO————
NOx——————NOx————
ROG——————ROG————
TOG——————TOG————
VegetationDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)Total
4.OperationsEmissionsDetails
——CO2e————————————————
——R————————————————
——N2O————————————————
——CH4————————————————
——CO2T————————————————
——NBCO2————————————————
——BCO2————————————————
——PM2.5T————————————————
——PM2.5D————————————————
17 /29
——PM2.5E————————————————
——PM10T————————————————
——PM10D————————————————
——PM10E————————————————
——SO2————————————————
——CO————————————————
——NOx————————————————
——ROG————————————————
——TOG————————————————
AnnualTotalSpeciesDaily,Summer(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—Daily,Winter(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—
————————
————————
LoadFactor0.370.40
PhaseDescription—————
————————
————————
Horsepower84.0367
————————
WorkDaysperPhase23.023.020010.023.0
————————
————————
HoursPerDay8.008.00
————————
DaysPerWeek5.005.005.005.005.00
————————
NumberperDay3.001.00
18 /29
————————
EndDate1/31/20241/31/202410/4/20241/12/20241/31/2024
————————
EngineTierAverageAverage
————————
————————
StartDate1/1/20241/1/20241/1/20241/1/20241/1/2024
————————
FuelTypeDieselDiesel
————————
————————
PhaseTypeDemolitionGradingBuildingConstructionPavingArchitecturalCoating
EquipmentTypeTractors/Loaders/BackhoesRubberTiredDozers
————————
————————
AnnualAvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—PhaseNameDemolitionGradingBuildingConstructionPavingArchitecturalCoatingPhaseNameDemolitionDemolition
5.ActivityData
0.730.410.370.400.290.200.740.370.450.370.420.360.380.560.48
VehicleMix—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDT
33.014884.036736782.014.084.046.084.081.089.036.010.037.0
8.008.007.008.006.006.008.006.008.008.006.008.007.006.006.00
MilesperTrip—18.510.240.0
1.001.002.001.001.001.001.001.003.001.001.001.001.001.001.00
19 /29
One-WayTripsperDay—12.5—32.1
AverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverage
DieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDiesel
TripType—WorkerVendorHauling
Concrete/IndustrialSawsGradersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesRubberTiredDozersCranesForkliftsGeneratorSetsTractors/Loaders/BackhoesWeldersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesPaversPavingEquipmentRollersCementandMorta
rMixersAirCompressors
DemolitionGradingGradingGradingBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionPavingPavingPavingPavingPavingArchitecturalCoatingPhaseNameDemolitio
nDemolitionDemolitionDemolition
HHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT
PM2.5Reduction55%
——18.510.220.0——18.510.220.0——18.510.220.0——18.510.220.0—
20 /29
——10.0—0.00——32.99.010.00——12.5—0.00——6.59—0.00—
PM10Reduction55%
Onsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck
DemolitionGradingGradingGradingGradingGradingBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionPavingPavingPavingPavingPavingArchitecturalCoatingArch
itecturalCoatingArchitecturalCoatingArchitecturalCoatingArchitecturalCoatingControlStrategiesAppliedWaterunpavedroadstwicedaily
ParkingAreaCoated(sqft)—AcresPaved(acres)——0.00
PM2.5Reduction74%36%
44%9%Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)17,700MaterialDemolished(BuildingSquareFootage)64,2000.000.00%Asphalt0%0%0%
Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)53,100AcresGraded(acres)0.0023.00.00PM10Reduction74%36%
21 /29
44%9%ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)19,440MaterialExported(cy)0.00—0.00AreaPaved(acres)0.000.000.00
Frequency(perday)32
ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)58,320MaterialImported(cy)0.00—0.00
Limitvehiclespeedsonunpavedroadsto25mphSweeppavedroadsoncepermonthPhaseNameArchitecturalCoatingPhaseNameDemolitionGradingPavingControlStrategiesAppliedWaterExposedAreaWaterDemolishedAreaLandUseStripM
allGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuilding
N2O<0.005
FinalAcresNaturalGasSaved(btu/year)
0%FinalAcres
CH40.03
InitialAcresElectricitySaved(kWh/year)
22 /29
CO2532
—InitialAcres
VegetationSoilTypeNumber
kWhperYear0.00
ApartmentsMidRiseYear2024VegetationLandUseTypeBiomassCoverTypeTreeType
6.ClimateRiskDetailedReport
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Unitannualdaysofextremeheatannualdayswithprecipitationabove20mmmetersofinundationdepthannualhectaresburned
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
23 /29
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectLocation0.000.000.000.00
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityD
egradation
Cal-Adaptmidcentury2040–2059averageprojectionsforfourhazardsarereportedbelowforyourprojectlocation.TheseareunderRepresentationConcentrationPathway(RCP)8.5whichassumesGHGemissionswillcontinuetorisestr
onglythrough2050andthenplateauaround2100.TemperatureandExtremeHeatdataareforgridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Theprojectionisbasedonthe98thhistoricalpercentileofdailymaximum/minimumtemperaturesfro
mobservedhistoricaldata(32climatemodelensemblefromCal-Adapt,2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5). Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.ExtremePrecipitationdataareforthegridcellinwhichyour
projectarelocated.Thethresholdof20mmisequivalenttoabout¾aninchofrain,whichwouldbelighttomoderaterainfallifreceivedoverafulldayorheavyrainifreceivedoveraperiodof2to4hours.Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)
by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.SeaLevelRisedataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromRadkeetal.(2017),asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderdifferent
incrementsofsealevelrisecoupledwithextremestormevents.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialinundationdepthforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpec
tedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis50meters(m)by50m,ora
bout164feet(ft)by164ft.Wildfiredataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromUCDavis,asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderhistoricaldataofclimate,veg
etation,populationdensity,andlarge(>400ha)firehistory.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialwildfireprobabilitiesforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsabou
texpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km
)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestex
posure.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectCensusTract—32.172.095.6
24 /29
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradationIndicatorExposureIndicatorsAQ-OzoneAQ-PMAQ-DPM
Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectreferstoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.The
overallvulnerabilityscoresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresdonotincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.Thesensitivityscorereflects
theextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectreferstoitsabilityto
manageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalculatedbasedonthe
potentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.7.HealthandEquityDetails ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,grea
terthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
8.9548.90.0089.962.7—58.669.298.758.739.0—12.822.019.6—6.5233.24.5923.758.4ResultforProjectCensusTract—82.8564096
25 /29
DrinkingWaterLeadRiskHousingPesticidesToxicReleasesTrafficEffectIndicatorsCleanUpSitesGroundwaterHazWasteFacilities/GeneratorsImpairedWaterBodiesSolidWasteSensitivePopulationAsthmaCardio-vascularLowB
irthWeightsSocioeconomicFactorIndicatorsEducationHousingLinguisticPovertyUnemploymentIndicatorEconomicAbovePoverty
ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
92.634415571.46156807—79.8280508110035.76286411—74.5797510669.25445913—91.0817400257.05119979—23.3286282681.3550622445.617862182.3995893754.632362376—17.6825356176.697035878.7373283795.3933016859.348
13294—73.784165280.0
26 /29
EmployedMedianHIEducationBachelor'sorhigherHighschoolenrollmentPreschoolenrollmentTransportationAutoAccessActivecommutingSocial2-parenthouseholdsVotingNeighborhoodAlcoholavailabilityParkaccessRetaild
ensitySupermarketaccessTreecanopyHousingHomeownershipHousinghabitabilityLow-inchomeownerseverehousingcostburdenLow-increnterseverehousingcostburdenUncrowdedhousingHealthOutcomesInsuredadultsArthritis
84.50.00.00.00.00.00.068.887.280.265.40.00.00.019.60.00.0—0.00.00.0—0.00.031.069.378.4
27 /29
AsthmaERAdmissionsHighBloodPressureCancer(excludingskin)AsthmaCoronaryHeartDiseaseChronicObstructivePulmonaryDiseaseDiagnosedDiabetesLifeExpectancyatBirthCognitivelyDisabledPhysically
DisabledHeartAttackERAdmissionsMentalHealthNotGoodChronicKidneyDiseaseObesityPedestrianInjuriesPhysicalHealthNotGoodStrokeHealthRiskBehaviorsBingeDrinkingCurrentSmokerNoLeisureTimeforPhysicalActivit
yClimateChangeExposuresWildfireRiskSLRInundationAreaChildrenElderlyEnglishSpeaking
14.477.2—19.243.523.0—11.3—48.5ResultforProjectCensusTract26.079.0NoNoNo
28 /29
Foreign-bornOutdoorWorkersClimateChangeAdaptiveCapacityImperviousSurfaceCoverTrafficDensityTrafficAccessOtherIndicesHardshipOtherDecisionSupport2016VotingMetricCalEnviroScreen4.0ScoreforProjectLocati
on(a)HealthyPlacesIndexScoreforProjectLocation(b)ProjectLocatedinaDesignatedDisadvantagedCommunity(SenateBill535)ProjectLocatedinaLow-IncomeCommunity(AssemblyBill1550)ProjectLocatedinaCommunityAirPro
tectionProgramCommunity(AssemblyBill617)
a:ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.b:ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greater
than50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.NoHealth&EquityMeasuresselected.Health&EquityEvaluationScorecardnotcompleted.NoHealth&EquityCustomMeasurescreated.
JustificationSeeNoteA.1SeeNoteA.2
29 /29
ScreenConstruction:ConstructionPhasesConstruction:TripsandVMT
8.UserChangestoDefaultData
1 /34
2 /34
3 /34
4 /34
5 /34
Description—
Population—
SpecialLandscapeArea(sqft)—
LandscapeArea(sqft)0.00
ValueDowntownSPUpdate-Operations(2024)2024—Plan/communityCounty3.5017.633.92112919374658,-118.41555573938703LosAngeles-SouthCoastElSegundoSouthCoastAQMDSouthCoast45347SouthernCaliforniaEdisonSouthern
CaliforniaGas2022.1.1.19
6 /34
BuildingArea(sqft)130,000
LotAcreage2.98
Unit1000sqft
Size130
DataFieldProjectNameOperationalYearLeadAgencyLandUseScaleAnalysisLevelforDefaultsWindspeed(m/s)Precipitation(days)LocationCountyCityAirDistrictAirBasinTAZEDFZElectricUtilityGasUtilityAppVersionLandUs
eSubtypeStripMall
1.BasicProjectInformation
CO2e—103,177—98,946—89,323—14,789
R—360—13.2—139—23.0
———
N2O—3.79—3.97—3.54—0.59
CH4—60.0—60.1—59.6—9.87
——888
CO2T—100,189—96,245—86,639—14,344
NBCO2—99,642—95,698—86,092—14,254
———
BCO2—547—547—547—90.5
PM2.5T—20.6—20.6—17.9—3.27
0.000.000.00
PM2.5D—19.8—19.8—17.2—3.14
7 /34
PM2.5E—0.76—0.74—0.69—0.13
200,00024,000288,000
PM10T—79.0—78.9—68.5—12.5
PM10D—78.1—78.1—67.8—12.4
4.590.557.89
PM10E—0.81—0.78—0.73—0.13
SO2—0.90—0.86—0.76—0.14
1000sqft1000sqftDwellingUnit
CO—419—352—340—62.0
NOx—36.8—39.9—35.9—6.55
20024.0300
ROG—58.0—53.3—51.2—9.35
TOG—47.8—42.8—40.4—7.38
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseUn/Mit.Daily,Summer(Max)Unmit.Daily,Winter(Max)Unmit.AverageDaily(Max)Unmit.Annual(Max)Unmit.
Nomeasuresselected 2.EmissionsSummary
CO2e—91,4091099,2648761,5153.97103,177—87,2870.009,2648761,5153.9798,946—77,59074.89,2648761,515
R—356————3.97360—9.23————3.9713.2—135————
N2O—3.43<0.0050.080.280.00—3.79—3.620.000.080.280.00—3.97—3.19<0.0050.080.280.00
CH4—4.14<0.0050.8511.743.3—60.0—4.300.000.8511.743.3—60.1—3.75<0.0050.8511.743.3
CO2T—89,9271099,220500433—100,189—86,0930.009,220500433—96,245—76,41274.59,220500433
NBCO2—89,9271099,2203860.00—99,642—86,0930.009,2203860.00—95,698—76,41274.59,2203860.00
BCO2——0.00—114433—547——0.00—114433—547——0.00—114433
PM2.5T—20.40.030.20———20.6—20.40.000.20———20.6—17.70.020.20——
PM2.5D—19.8—————19.8—19.8—————19.8—17.2————
8 /34
PM2.5E—0.540.030.20———0.76—0.540.000.20———0.74—0.470.020.20——
PM10T—78.70.040.20———79.0—78.70.000.20———78.9—68.30.020.20——
PM10D—78.1—————78.1—78.1—————78.1—67.8————
PM10E—0.580.040.20———0.81—0.580.000.20———0.78—0.510.020.20——
SO2—0.88<0.0050.02———0.90—0.840.000.02———0.86—0.75<0.0050.02——
CO—38532.31.81———419—3500.001.81———352—31622.21.81——
NOx—34.00.302.58———36.8—37.30.002.58———39.9—33.10.202.58——
ROG—38.619.20.14———58.0—38.115.10.14———53.3—33.217.90.14——
TOG—43.14.380.29———47.8—42.60.000.29———42.8—37.13.000.29——
SectorDaily,Summer(Max)MobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalDaily,Winter(Max)MobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalAverageDailyMobileAreaEnergyWaterWaste
3.9789,323—12,84612.41,5341452510.6614,789CO2e—52,24717,6657,574
3.97139—22.3————0.6623.0R—20368.829.5
—3.54—0.53<0.0050.010.050.00—0.59N2O—1.960.660.28
—59.6—0.62<0.0050.141.947.17—9.87CH4—2.360.800.34
—86,639—12,65112.31,52682.771.7—14,344CO2T—51,40117,3797,451
—86,092—12,65112.31,52663.90.00—14,254NBCO2—51,40117,3797,451
—547——0.00—18.871.7—90.5BCO2————
—17.9—3.23<0.0050.04———3.27PM2.5T—11.73.941.69
—17.2—3.14—————3.14PM2.5D—11.33.841.64
9 /34
—0.69—0.09<0.0050.04———0.13PM2.5E—0.310.100.04
—68.5—12.5<0.0050.04———12.5PM10T—45.015.26.52
—67.8—12.4—————12.4PM10D—44.715.16.48
—0.73—0.09<0.0050.04———0.13PM10E—0.330.110.05
—0.76—0.14<0.005<0.005———0.14SO2—0.500.170.07
—340—57.74.040.33———62.0CO—22074.331.9
—35.9—6.040.040.47———6.55NOx—19.46.552.81
—51.2—6.053.270.03———9.35ROG—21.97.413.18
—40.4—6.780.550.05———7.38TOG—24.58.273.55
Refrig.TotalAnnualMobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuilding
4.OperationsEmissionsDetails
13,92391,409—49,89016,8687,23213,29787,287—7,6662,1439172,12112,846
54.1356—5.281.780.761.409.23—13.33.721.593.6822.3
0.533.43—2.060.700.300.563.62—0.310.090.040.090.53
0.644.14—2.450.830.350.674.30—0.370.100.040.100.62
13,69689,927—49,20916,6387,13313,11386,093—7,5492,1109032,08912,651
13,69689,927—49,20916,6387,13313,11386,093—7,5492,1109032,08912,651
——————————————
3.1020.4—11.73.941.693.1020.4—1.930.540.230.533.23
3.0219.8—11.33.841.643.0219.8—1.870.520.220.523.14
10 /34
0.080.54—0.310.100.040.080.54—0.050.010.010.010.09
12.078.7—45.015.26.5212.078.7—7.442.080.892.0512.5
11.978.1—44.715.16.4811.978.1—7.382.060.882.0412.4
0.090.58—0.330.110.050.090.58—0.060.020.010.020.09
0.130.88—0.480.160.070.130.84—0.080.020.010.020.14
59.1385—20067.528.953.8350—34.49.604.119.6157.7
5.2334.0—21.37.193.085.7437.3—3.601.010.431.016.04
6.1138.6—21.67.303.136.0238.1—3.591.000.431.046.05
6.8043.1—24.28.173.506.7142.6—4.011.120.481.166.78
ApartmentsTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
CO2e—1,2273,4244111,0576,118—1,2273,4244111,0576,118—203
R——————————————
N2O—0.010.04<0.0050.010.07—0.010.04<0.0050.010.07—<0.005
CH4—0.120.320.040.100.58—0.120.320.040.100.58—0.02
CO2T—1,2203,4044091,0506,083—1,2203,4044091,0506,083—202
NBCO2—1,2203,4044091,0506,083—1,2203,4044091,0506,083—202
BCO2——————————————
PM2.5T——————————————
PM2.5D——————————————
11 /34
PM2.5E——————————————
PM10T——————————————
PM10D——————————————
PM10E——————————————
SO2——————————————
CO——————————————
NOx——————————————
ROG——————————————
TOG——————————————
LandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripM
all
56768.01751,013CO2e—2501,6291951,0713,146—250
————R————————
0.01<0.005<0.0050.01N2O—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.0050.01—<0.005
0.050.010.020.10CH4—0.020.140.020.090.28—0.02
56467.61741,007CO2T—2491,6251951,0683,137—249
56467.61741,007NBCO2—2491,6251951,0683,137—249
————BCO2————————
————PM2.5T—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM2.5D————————
12 /34
————PM2.5E—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM10T—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM10D————————
————PM10E—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————SO2—<0.0050.01<0.0050.010.02—<0.005
————CO—0.181.140.140.361.81—0.18
————NOx—0.211.360.160.842.58—0.21
————ROG—0.010.070.010.050.14—0.01
————TOG—0.020.150.020.100.29—0.02
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMall
1,6291951,0713,146—41.427032.4177521CO2e—0.00
——————————R——
<0.005<0.005<0.0050.01—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005N2O—0.00
0.140.020.090.28—<0.0050.02<0.0050.020.05CH4—0.00
1,6251951,0683,137—41.326932.3177519CO2T—0.00
1,6251951,0683,137—41.326932.3177519NBCO2—0.00
——————————BCO2—0.00
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM2.5T—0.00
——————————PM2.5D——
13 /34
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM2.5E—0.00
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM10T—0.00
——————————PM10D——
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM10E—0.00
0.01<0.0050.010.02—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005SO2—0.00
1.140.140.361.81—0.030.210.030.070.33CO—0.00
1.360.160.842.58—0.040.250.030.150.47NOx—0.00
0.070.010.050.14—<0.0050.01<0.0050.010.03ROG—0.00
0.150.020.100.29—<0.0050.03<0.0050.020.05TOG—0.00
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalSourceDaily,Summer(Max)Hearths
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.412.4
———————————————
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.312.3
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.312.3
———0.00—0.00——0.00—0.00———0.00
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
———————————————
14 /34
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——0.040.04—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
———————————————
——0.040.04—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——32.332.3—0.00——0.00—0.00——4.044.04
——0.300.30—0.00——0.00—0.00——0.040.04
13.71.394.0819.2—0.0013.71.3915.1—0.002.510.250.513.27
——4.384.38—0.00——0.00—0.00——0.550.55
ConsumerArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotalDaily,Winter(Max)HearthsConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsTotalAnnualHearthsConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotal
CO2e—14252544.4165876—14252544.4165876
R————————————
N2O—0.050.170.010.050.28—0.050.170.010.050.28
CH4—1.907.010.592.2011.7—1.907.010.592.2011.7
CO2T—81.129925.494.1500—81.129925.494.1500
NBCO2—62.623119.672.7386—62.623119.672.7386
BCO2—18.568.15.7721.4114—18.568.15.7721.4114
PM2.5T————————————
PM2.5D————————————
15 /34
PM2.5E————————————
PM10T————————————
PM10D————————————
PM10E————————————
SO2————————————
CO————————————
NOx————————————
ROG————————————
TOG————————————
LandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
—23.586.97.3627.3145CO2e—2573514894181,515
——————R——————
—0.010.03<0.0050.010.05N2O—0.000.000.000.000.00
—0.311.160.100.361.94CH4—7.3510.014.011.943.3
—13.449.54.2015.682.7CO2T—73.6100140120433
—10.438.33.2412.063.9NBCO2—0.000.000.000.000.00
—3.0511.30.963.5518.8BCO2—73.6100140120433
——————PM2.5T——————
——————PM2.5D——————
16 /34
——————PM2.5E——————
——————PM10T——————
——————PM10D——————
——————PM10E——————
——————SO2——————
——————CO——————
——————NOx——————
——————ROG——————
——————TOG——————
AnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
—2573514894181,515—42.658.180.969.3251CO2e
————————————R
—0.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00N2O
—7.3510.014.011.943.3—1.221.662.311.987.17CH4
—73.6100140120433—12.216.623.119.871.7CO2T
—0.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00NBCO2
—73.6100140120433—12.216.623.119.871.7BCO2
————————————PM2.5T
————————————PM2.5D
17 /34
————————————PM2.5E
————————————PM10T
————————————PM10D
————————————PM10E
————————————SO2
————————————CO
————————————NOx
————————————ROG
————————————TOG
Daily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUse
—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.130.08
—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.130.08
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
18 /34
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
Daily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGene
ralOfficeBuilding
0.100.340.66CO2e——————
0.100.340.66R——————
———N2O——————
———CH4——————
———CO2T——————
———NBCO2——————
———BCO2——————
———PM2.5T——————
———PM2.5D——————
19 /34
———PM2.5E——————
———PM10T——————
———PM10D——————
———PM10E——————
———SO2——————
———CO——————
———NOx——————
———ROG——————
———TOG——————
MedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalEquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
20 /34
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
EquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalEquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
21 /34
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
VegetationDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e———————————————————
R———————————————————
N2O———————————————————
CH4———————————————————
CO2T———————————————————
NBCO2———————————————————
BCO2———————————————————
PM2.5T———————————————————
PM2.5D———————————————————
22 /34
PM2.5E———————————————————
PM10T———————————————————
PM10D———————————————————
PM10E———————————————————
SO2———————————————————
CO———————————————————
NOx———————————————————
ROG———————————————————
TOG———————————————————
SpeciesDaily,Summer(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—Daily,Winter(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—AnnualAvoidedSubtotal
—————
—————
VMT/Year21,058,5325,886,0402,518,0535,817,883
—————
—————
VMT/Sunday29,0451,53137312,606
—————
—————
VMT/Saturday59,7684,8342,24915,134
—————
—————
VMT/Weekday63,01021,3049,13416,767
—————
Unmitigated(number)—00
23 /34
—————
Trips/Year1,925,589538,219230,250566,271
—————
—————
Trips/Sunday2,65614034.11,227
—————
—————
Trips/Saturday5,4654422061,473
—————
—————
Trips/Weekday5,7621,9488351,632
—————
—————
SequestSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—LandUseTypeStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseHearthTypeApartmentsMidRiseWoodFireplacesGasFireplaces
5.ActivityData
NaturalGas(kBTU/yr)778,3035,069,293608,3153,332,053
ParkingAreaCoated(sqft)—
Value0.00250N2O0.00400.00400.00400.0040
Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)177,000
0000000CH40.03300.03300.03300.0330
24 /34
Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)531,000
Unitday/yrday/yrCO2349349349349
ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)194,400
Electricity(kWh/yr)1,276,7783,564,057427,6871,099,750
PropaneFireplacesElectricFireplacesNoFireplacesConventionalWoodStovesCatalyticWoodStovesNon-CatalyticWoodStovesPelletWoodStovesResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)583200SeasonSnowDaysSummerDaysLandUse
StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRise
TimesServiced18.01.00
ServiceLeakRate4.000.00
OutdoorWater(gal/year)0.000.000.000.00Cogeneration(kWh/year)————
OperationsLeakRate4.001.00
Quantity(kg)<0.0050.04
25 /34
GWP2,0881,430
IndoorWater(gal/year)9,629,42835,546,7503,011,53311,182,140Waste(ton/year)137186259222
RefrigerantR-410AR-134a
EquipmentTypeOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsStand-aloneretailrefrigeratorsandfreezers
LandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseLandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseLandUseTypeStripMallStripMall
20.01.0018.01.0018.010.01.00
LoadFactorLoadFactor
AnnualHeatInput(MMBtu/yr)
7.500.004.000.004.002.500.00
HorsepowerHorsepower
DailyHeatInput(MMBtu/day)
7.500.604.000.604.002.500.60
HoursPerDayHoursperYear
<0.0050.02<0.0050.45<0.005<0.0050.12BoilerRating(MMBtu/hr)
26 /34
NumberperDayHoursperDay
3,9221,4302,0881,4302,0882,0881,430
Number
EngineTierNumberperDay
R-404AR-134aR-410AR-134aR-410AR-410AR-134a
FuelType
FuelTypeFuelType
Walk-inrefrigeratorsandfreezersHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezersOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezersOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsAverageroomA/C&OtherresidentialA/Can
dheatpumpsHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezers
StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseApartmentsMidRiseEquipmentTypeEquipmentTypeEquipmentType
FinalAcresNaturalGasSaved(btu/year)
FinalAcresUnitannualdaysofextremeheat
FuelTypeInitialAcresElectricitySaved(kWh/year)
27 /34
InitialAcresResultforProjectLocation0.00
VegetationSoilTypeNumber
EquipmentTypeVegetationLandUseTypeBiomassCoverTypeTreeTypeClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeat
6.ClimateRiskDetailedReport Cal-Adaptmidcentury2040–2059averageprojectionsforfourhazardsarereportedbelowforyourprojectlocation.TheseareunderRepresentationConcentrationPathway(RCP)8.5whichassumesGHGem
issionswillcontinuetorisestronglythrough2050andthenplateauaround2100.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
annualdayswithprecipitationabove20mmmetersofinundationdepthannualhectaresburned
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
28 /34
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
0.000.000.00
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradation
TemperatureandExtremeHeatdataareforgridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Theprojectionisbasedonthe98thhistoricalpercentileofdailymaximum/minimumtemperaturesfromobservedhistoricaldata(32climatemodelens
emblefromCal-Adapt,2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5). Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.ExtremePrecipitationdataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Thethresholdof20mmisequ
ivalenttoabout¾aninchofrain,whichwouldbelighttomoderaterainfallifreceivedoverafulldayorheavyrainifreceivedoveraperiodof2to4hours.Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.SeaLevelRised
ataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromRadkeetal.(2017),asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderdifferentincrementsofsealevelrisecoupledwithextrem
estormevents.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialinundationdepthforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier
(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis50meters(m)by50m,orabout164feet(ft)by164ft.Wildfiredataarefor
thegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromUCDavis,asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderhistoricaldataofclimate,vegetation,populationdensity,andlarge(>400ha
)firehistory.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialwildfireprobabilitiesforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer
/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.Thesensitivi
tyscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectrefer
stoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalcu
latedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresdonotincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectCensusTract—32.172.095.68.9548.90.00
29 /34
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradationIndicatorExposureIndicatorsAQ-OzoneAQ-PMAQ-DPMDrinkingWaterLeadRiskH
ousingPesticides
Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofa
projectreferstoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilitysc
oresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.7.HealthandEquityDetails ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscor
eis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
89.962.7—58.669.298.758.739.0—12.822.019.6—6.5233.24.5923.758.4ResultforProjectCensusTract—82.856409692.634415571.46156807—
30 /34
ToxicReleasesTrafficEffectIndicatorsCleanUpSitesGroundwaterHazWasteFacilities/GeneratorsImpairedWaterBodiesSolidWasteSensitivePopulationAsthmaCardio-vascularLowBirthWeightsSocioeconomicFactorIndicato
rsEducationHousingLinguisticPovertyUnemploymentIndicatorEconomicAbovePovertyEmployedMedianHIEducation
ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
79.8280508110035.76286411—74.5797510669.25445913—91.0817400257.05119979—23.3286282681.3550622445.617862182.3995893754.632362376—17.6825356176.697035878.7373283795.3933016859.34813294—73.784165280.084
.50.00.0
31 /34
Bachelor'sorhigherHighschoolenrollmentPreschoolenrollmentTransportationAutoAccessActivecommutingSocial2-parenthouseholdsVotingNeighborhoodAlcoholavailabilityParkaccessRetaildensitySupermarketaccessTr
eecanopyHousingHomeownershipHousinghabitabilityLow-inchomeownerseverehousingcostburdenLow-increnterseverehousingcostburdenUncrowdedhousingHealthOutcomesInsuredadultsArthritisAsthmaERAdmissionsHighBlo
odPressureCancer(excludingskin)
0.00.00.00.068.887.280.265.40.00.00.019.60.00.0—0.00.00.0—0.00.031.069.378.414.477.2—
32 /34
AsthmaCoronaryHeartDiseaseChronicObstructivePulmonaryDiseaseDiagnosedDiabetesLifeExpectancyatBirthCognitivelyDisabledPhysically DisabledHeartAttackERAdmissionsMentalHealthNotGoodChronicKidneyDiseaseO
besityPedestrianInjuriesPhysicalHealthNotGoodStrokeHealthRiskBehaviorsBingeDrinkingCurrentSmokerNoLeisureTimeforPhysicalActivityClimateChangeExposuresWildfireRiskSLRInundationAreaChildrenElderlyEngli
shSpeakingForeign-bornOutdoorWorkersClimateChangeAdaptiveCapacity
19.243.523.0—11.3—48.5ResultforProjectCensusTract26.079.0NoNoNoJustification
33 /34
ImperviousSurfaceCoverTrafficDensityTrafficAccessOtherIndicesHardshipOtherDecisionSupport2016VotingMetricCalEnviroScreen4.0ScoreforProjectLocation(a)HealthyPlacesIndexScoreforProjectLocation(b)Projec
tLocatedinaDesignatedDisadvantagedCommunity(SenateBill535)ProjectLocatedinaLow-IncomeCommunity(AssemblyBill1550)ProjectLocatedinaCommunityAirProtectionProgramCommunity(AssemblyBill617)Screen
a:ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.b:ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greater
than50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.NoHealth&EquityMeasuresselected.Health&EquityEvaluationScorecardnotcompleted.NoHealth&EquityCustomMeasurescreated.8.Us
erChangestoDefaultData
SeeNoteA.3
34 /34
Operations:Hearths
1 /34
2 /34
3 /34
4 /34
5 /34
Description—
Population—
SpecialLandscapeArea(sqft)—
LandscapeArea(sqft)0.00
ValueDowntownSPUpdate-Operations(2030)2030—Plan/communityCounty3.5017.633.92112919374658,-118.41555573938703LosAngeles-SouthCoastElSegundoSouthCoastAQMDSouthCoast45347SouthernCaliforniaEdisonSouthern
CaliforniaGas2022.1.1.19
6 /34
BuildingArea(sqft)130,000
LotAcreage2.98
Unit1000sqft
Size130
DataFieldProjectNameOperationalYearLeadAgencyLandUseScaleAnalysisLevelforDefaultsWindspeed(m/s)Precipitation(days)LocationCountyCityAirDistrictAirBasinTAZEDFZElectricUtilityGasUtilityAppVersionLandUs
eSubtypeStripMall
1.BasicProjectInformation
CO2e—90,509—86,912—78,391—12,979
R—182—8.60—71.5—11.8
———
N2O—3.16—3.30—2.94—0.49
CH4—59.1—59.2—58.7—9.72
——888
CO2T—87,910—84,442—75,974—12,578
NBCO2—87,363—83,896—75,427—12,488
———
BCO2—547—547—547—90.5
PM2.5T—20.4—20.4—17.7—3.24
0.000.000.00
PM2.5D—19.8—19.8—17.2—3.14
7 /34
PM2.5E—0.62—0.59—0.56—0.10
200,00024,000288,000
PM10T—78.7—78.7—68.3—12.5
PM10D—78.1—78.1—67.7—12.4
4.590.557.89
PM10E—0.65—0.62—0.59—0.11
SO2—0.79—0.76—0.68—0.12
1000sqft1000sqftDwellingUnit
CO—323—264—261—47.6
NOx—25.0—26.8—24.2—4.42
20024.0300
ROG—48.6—44.3—43.3—7.89
TOG—37.2—32.7—31.4—5.74
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseUn/Mit.Daily,Summer(Max)Unmit.Daily,Winter(Max)Unmit.AverageDaily(Max)Unmit.Annual(Max)Unmit.
Nomeasuresselected 2.EmissionsSummary
CO2e—80,3711097,7317791,5153.9790,509—76,8830.007,7317791,5153.9786,912—68,28874.87,7317791,515
R—178————3.97182—4.62————3.978.60—67.5————
N2O—2.80<0.0050.080.280.00—3.16—2.940.000.080.280.00—3.30—2.59<0.0050.080.280.00
CH4—3.21<0.0050.8511.743.3—59.1—3.320.000.8511.743.3—59.2—2.89<0.0050.8511.743.3
CO2T—79,2781097,687403433—87,910—75,9200.007,687403433—84,442—67,37774.57,687403433
NBCO2—79,2781097,6872890.00—87,363—75,9200.007,6872890.00—83,896—67,37774.57,6872890.00
BCO2——0.00—114433—547——0.00—114433—547——0.00—114433
PM2.5T—20.20.030.20———20.4—20.20.000.20———20.4—17.50.020.20——
PM2.5D—19.8—————19.8—19.8—————19.8—17.2————
8 /34
PM2.5E—0.390.030.20———0.62—0.390.000.20———0.59—0.340.020.20——
PM10T—78.50.040.20———78.7—78.50.000.20———78.7—68.10.020.20——
PM10D—78.1—————78.1—78.1—————78.1—67.7————
PM10E—0.420.040.20———0.65—0.420.000.20———0.62—0.370.020.20——
SO2—0.78<0.0050.02———0.79—0.740.000.02———0.76—0.66<0.0050.02——
CO—28932.51.81———323—2620.001.81———264—23722.21.81——
NOx—22.10.292.58———25.0—24.20.002.58———26.8—21.50.202.58——
ROG—29.319.10.14———48.6—29.015.10.14———44.3—25.217.90.14——
TOG—32.74.300.29———37.2—32.40.000.29———32.7—28.22.940.29——
SectorDaily,Summer(Max)MobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalDaily,Winter(Max)MobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalAverageDailyMobileAreaEnergyWaterWaste
3.9778,391—11,30612.41,2801292510.6612,979CO2e—45,93815,5326,659
3.9771.5—11.2————0.6611.8R—10234.514.8
—2.94—0.43<0.0050.010.050.00—0.49N2O—1.600.540.23
—58.7—0.48<0.0050.141.947.17—9.72CH4—1.830.620.27
—75,974—11,15512.31,27366.671.7—12,578CO2T—45,31515,3216,569
—75,427—11,15512.31,27347.80.00—12,488NBCO2—45,31515,3216,569
—547——0.00—18.871.7—90.5BCO2————
—17.7—3.20<0.0050.04———3.24PM2.5T—11.63.911.67
—17.2—3.14—————3.14PM2.5D—11.33.831.64
9 /34
—0.56—0.06<0.0050.04———0.10PM2.5E—0.220.080.03
—68.3—12.4<0.0050.04———12.5PM10T—44.915.26.50
—67.7—12.4—————12.4PM10D—44.615.16.47
—0.59—0.07<0.0050.04———0.11PM10E—0.240.080.03
—0.68—0.12<0.005<0.005———0.12SO2—0.440.150.06
—261—43.24.060.33———47.6CO—16555.723.9
—24.2—3.920.040.47———4.42NOx—12.64.271.83
—43.3—4.613.260.03———7.89ROG—16.65.622.41
—31.4—5.150.540.05———5.74TOG—18.56.272.69
Refrig.TotalAnnualMobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuilding
4.OperationsEmissionsDetails
12,24280,371—43,94414,8576,37011,71276,883—6,7471,8868071,86711,306
27.1178—2.640.890.380.704.62—6.671.870.801.8411.2
0.432.80—1.680.570.240.452.94—0.260.070.030.070.43
0.503.21—1.890.640.270.513.32—0.280.080.030.080.48
12,07479,278—43,39414,6726,29011,56375,920—6,6571,8617961,84211,155
12,07479,278—43,39414,6726,29011,56375,920—6,6571,8617961,84211,155
——————————————
3.0720.2—11.63.911.673.0720.2—1.910.530.230.533.20
3.0219.8—11.33.831.643.0219.8—1.870.520.220.523.14
10 /34
0.060.39—0.220.080.030.060.39—0.040.01<0.0050.010.06
11.978.5—44.915.26.5011.978.5—7.412.070.892.0512.4
11.978.1—44.615.16.4711.978.1—7.372.060.882.0412.4
0.060.42—0.240.080.030.060.42—0.040.01<0.0050.010.07
0.120.78—0.420.140.060.110.74—0.070.020.010.020.12
44.3289—15050.621.740.4262—25.87.203.087.2143.2
3.4222.1—13.84.672.003.7424.2—2.330.650.280.653.92
4.6429.3—16.45.562.384.5929.0—2.730.760.330.794.61
5.1532.7—18.46.222.675.1132.4—3.050.850.360.885.15
ApartmentsTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
CO2e—9192,5663087924,585—9192,5663087924,585—152
R——————————————
N2O—0.010.04<0.0050.010.07—0.010.04<0.0050.010.07—<0.005
CH4—0.120.320.040.100.58—0.120.320.040.100.58—0.02
CO2T—9122,5463067864,550—9122,5463067864,550—151
NBCO2—9122,5463067864,550—9122,5463067864,550—151
BCO2——————————————
PM2.5T——————————————
PM2.5D——————————————
11 /34
PM2.5E——————————————
PM10T——————————————
PM10D——————————————
PM10E——————————————
SO2——————————————
CO——————————————
NOx——————————————
ROG——————————————
TOG——————————————
LandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripM
all
42551.0131759CO2e—2501,6291951,0713,146—250
————R————————
0.01<0.005<0.0050.01N2O—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.0050.01—<0.005
0.050.010.020.10CH4—0.020.140.020.090.28—0.02
42250.6130753CO2T—2491,6251951,0683,137—249
42250.6130753NBCO2—2491,6251951,0683,137—249
————BCO2————————
————PM2.5T—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM2.5D————————
12 /34
————PM2.5E—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM10T—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM10D————————
————PM10E—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————SO2—<0.0050.01<0.0050.010.02—<0.005
————CO—0.181.140.140.361.81—0.18
————NOx—0.211.360.160.842.58—0.21
————ROG—0.010.070.010.050.14—0.01
————TOG—0.020.150.020.100.29—0.02
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMall
1,6291951,0713,146—41.427032.4177521CO2e—0.00
——————————R——
<0.005<0.005<0.0050.01—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005N2O—0.00
0.140.020.090.28—<0.0050.02<0.0050.020.05CH4—0.00
1,6251951,0683,137—41.326932.3177519CO2T—0.00
1,6251951,0683,137—41.326932.3177519NBCO2—0.00
——————————BCO2—0.00
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM2.5T—0.00
——————————PM2.5D——
13 /34
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM2.5E—0.00
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM10T—0.00
——————————PM10D——
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM10E—0.00
0.01<0.0050.010.02—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005SO2—0.00
1.140.140.361.81—0.030.210.030.070.33CO—0.00
1.360.160.842.58—0.040.250.030.150.47NOx—0.00
0.070.010.050.14—<0.0050.01<0.0050.010.03ROG—0.00
0.150.020.100.29—<0.0050.03<0.0050.020.05TOG—0.00
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalSourceDaily,Summer(Max)Hearths
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.412.4
———————————————
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.312.3
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.312.3
———0.00—0.00——0.00—0.00———0.00
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
———————————————
14 /34
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——0.040.04—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
———————————————
——0.040.04—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——32.532.5—0.00——0.00—0.00——4.064.06
——0.290.29—0.00——0.00—0.00——0.040.04
13.71.394.0019.1—0.0013.71.3915.1—0.002.510.250.503.26
——4.304.30—0.00——0.00—0.00——0.540.54
ConsumerArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotalDaily,Winter(Max)HearthsConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsTotalAnnualHearthsConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotal
CO2e—12646639.5147779—12646639.5147779
R————————————
N2O—0.050.170.010.050.28—0.050.170.010.050.28
CH4—1.907.010.592.2011.7—1.907.010.592.2011.7
CO2T—65.324120.475.8403—65.324120.475.8403
NBCO2—46.817314.654.4289—46.817314.654.4289
BCO2—18.568.15.7721.4114—18.568.15.7721.4114
PM2.5T————————————
PM2.5D————————————
15 /34
PM2.5E————————————
PM10T————————————
PM10D————————————
PM10E————————————
SO2————————————
CO————————————
NOx————————————
ROG————————————
TOG————————————
LandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
—20.977.26.5424.3129CO2e—2573514894181,515
——————R——————
—0.010.03<0.0050.010.05N2O—0.000.000.000.000.00
—0.311.160.100.361.94CH4—7.3510.014.011.943.3
—10.839.93.3812.666.6CO2T—73.6100140120433
—7.7528.62.439.0047.8NBCO2—0.000.000.000.000.00
—3.0511.30.963.5518.8BCO2—73.6100140120433
——————PM2.5T——————
——————PM2.5D——————
16 /34
——————PM2.5E——————
——————PM10T——————
——————PM10D——————
——————PM10E——————
——————SO2——————
——————CO——————
——————NOx——————
——————ROG——————
——————TOG——————
AnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
—2573514894181,515—42.658.180.969.3251CO2e
————————————R
—0.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00N2O
—7.3510.014.011.943.3—1.221.662.311.987.17CH4
—73.6100140120433—12.216.623.119.871.7CO2T
—0.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00NBCO2
—73.6100140120433—12.216.623.119.871.7BCO2
————————————PM2.5T
————————————PM2.5D
17 /34
————————————PM2.5E
————————————PM10T
————————————PM10D
————————————PM10E
————————————SO2
————————————CO
————————————NOx
————————————ROG
————————————TOG
Daily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUse
—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.130.08
—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.130.08
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
18 /34
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
Daily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGene
ralOfficeBuilding
0.100.340.66CO2e——————
0.100.340.66R——————
———N2O——————
———CH4——————
———CO2T——————
———NBCO2——————
———BCO2——————
———PM2.5T——————
———PM2.5D——————
19 /34
———PM2.5E——————
———PM10T——————
———PM10D——————
———PM10E——————
———SO2——————
———CO——————
———NOx——————
———ROG——————
———TOG——————
MedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalEquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
20 /34
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
EquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalEquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
21 /34
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
VegetationDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e———————————————————
R———————————————————
N2O———————————————————
CH4———————————————————
CO2T———————————————————
NBCO2———————————————————
BCO2———————————————————
PM2.5T———————————————————
PM2.5D———————————————————
22 /34
PM2.5E———————————————————
PM10T———————————————————
PM10D———————————————————
PM10E———————————————————
SO2———————————————————
CO———————————————————
NOx———————————————————
ROG———————————————————
TOG———————————————————
SpeciesDaily,Summer(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—Daily,Winter(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—AnnualAvoidedSubtotal
—————
—————
VMT/Year21,058,5325,886,0402,518,0535,817,883
—————
—————
VMT/Sunday29,0451,53137312,606
—————
—————
VMT/Saturday59,7684,8342,24915,134
—————
—————
VMT/Weekday63,01021,3049,13416,767
—————
Unmitigated(number)—00
23 /34
—————
Trips/Year1,925,589538,219230,250566,271
—————
—————
Trips/Sunday2,65614034.11,227
—————
—————
Trips/Saturday5,4654422061,473
—————
—————
Trips/Weekday5,7621,9488351,632
—————
—————
SequestSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—LandUseTypeStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseHearthTypeApartmentsMidRiseWoodFireplacesGasFireplaces
5.ActivityData
NaturalGas(kBTU/yr)778,3035,069,293608,3153,332,053
ParkingAreaCoated(sqft)—
Value0.00250N2O0.00400.00400.00400.0040
Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)177,000
0000000CH40.03300.03300.03300.0330
24 /34
Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)531,000
Unitday/yrday/yrCO2261261261261
ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)194,400
Electricity(kWh/yr)1,276,7783,564,057427,6871,099,750
PropaneFireplacesElectricFireplacesNoFireplacesConventionalWoodStovesCatalyticWoodStovesNon-CatalyticWoodStovesPelletWoodStovesResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)583200SeasonSnowDaysSummerDaysLandUse
StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRise
TimesServiced18.01.00
ServiceLeakRate4.000.00
OutdoorWater(gal/year)0.000.000.000.00Cogeneration(kWh/year)————
OperationsLeakRate4.001.00
Quantity(kg)<0.0050.04
25 /34
GWP2,0881,430
IndoorWater(gal/year)9,629,42835,546,7503,011,53311,182,140Waste(ton/year)137186259222
RefrigerantR-410AR-134a
EquipmentTypeOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsStand-aloneretailrefrigeratorsandfreezers
LandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseLandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseLandUseTypeStripMallStripMall
20.01.0018.01.0018.010.01.00
LoadFactorLoadFactor
AnnualHeatInput(MMBtu/yr)
7.500.004.000.004.002.500.00
HorsepowerHorsepower
DailyHeatInput(MMBtu/day)
7.500.604.000.604.002.500.60
HoursPerDayHoursperYear
<0.0050.02<0.0050.45<0.005<0.0050.12BoilerRating(MMBtu/hr)
26 /34
NumberperDayHoursperDay
3,9221,4302,0881,4302,0882,0881,430
Number
EngineTierNumberperDay
R-404AR-134aR-410AR-134aR-410AR-410AR-134a
FuelType
FuelTypeFuelType
Walk-inrefrigeratorsandfreezersHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezersOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezersOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsAverageroomA/C&OtherresidentialA/Can
dheatpumpsHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezers
StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseApartmentsMidRiseEquipmentTypeEquipmentTypeEquipmentType
FinalAcresNaturalGasSaved(btu/year)
FinalAcresUnitannualdaysofextremeheat
FuelTypeInitialAcresElectricitySaved(kWh/year)
27 /34
InitialAcresResultforProjectLocation0.00
VegetationSoilTypeNumber
EquipmentTypeVegetationLandUseTypeBiomassCoverTypeTreeTypeClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeat
6.ClimateRiskDetailedReport Cal-Adaptmidcentury2040–2059averageprojectionsforfourhazardsarereportedbelowforyourprojectlocation.TheseareunderRepresentationConcentrationPathway(RCP)8.5whichassumesGHGem
issionswillcontinuetorisestronglythrough2050andthenplateauaround2100.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
annualdayswithprecipitationabove20mmmetersofinundationdepthannualhectaresburned
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
28 /34
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
0.000.000.00
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradation
TemperatureandExtremeHeatdataareforgridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Theprojectionisbasedonthe98thhistoricalpercentileofdailymaximum/minimumtemperaturesfromobservedhistoricaldata(32climatemodelens
emblefromCal-Adapt,2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5). Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.ExtremePrecipitationdataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Thethresholdof20mmisequ
ivalenttoabout¾aninchofrain,whichwouldbelighttomoderaterainfallifreceivedoverafulldayorheavyrainifreceivedoveraperiodof2to4hours.Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.SeaLevelRised
ataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromRadkeetal.(2017),asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderdifferentincrementsofsealevelrisecoupledwithextrem
estormevents.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialinundationdepthforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier
(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis50meters(m)by50m,orabout164feet(ft)by164ft.Wildfiredataarefor
thegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromUCDavis,asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderhistoricaldataofclimate,vegetation,populationdensity,andlarge(>400ha
)firehistory.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialwildfireprobabilitiesforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer
/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.Thesensitivi
tyscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectrefer
stoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalcu
latedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresdonotincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectCensusTract—32.172.095.68.9548.90.00
29 /34
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradationIndicatorExposureIndicatorsAQ-OzoneAQ-PMAQ-DPMDrinkingWaterLeadRiskH
ousingPesticides
Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofa
projectreferstoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilitysc
oresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.7.HealthandEquityDetails ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscor
eis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
89.962.7—58.669.298.758.739.0—12.822.019.6—6.5233.24.5923.758.4ResultforProjectCensusTract—82.856409692.634415571.46156807—
30 /34
ToxicReleasesTrafficEffectIndicatorsCleanUpSitesGroundwaterHazWasteFacilities/GeneratorsImpairedWaterBodiesSolidWasteSensitivePopulationAsthmaCardio-vascularLowBirthWeightsSocioeconomicFactorIndicato
rsEducationHousingLinguisticPovertyUnemploymentIndicatorEconomicAbovePovertyEmployedMedianHIEducation
ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
79.8280508110035.76286411—74.5797510669.25445913—91.0817400257.05119979—23.3286282681.3550622445.617862182.3995893754.632362376—17.6825356176.697035878.7373283795.3933016859.34813294—73.784165280.084
.50.00.0
31 /34
Bachelor'sorhigherHighschoolenrollmentPreschoolenrollmentTransportationAutoAccessActivecommutingSocial2-parenthouseholdsVotingNeighborhoodAlcoholavailabilityParkaccessRetaildensitySupermarketaccessTr
eecanopyHousingHomeownershipHousinghabitabilityLow-inchomeownerseverehousingcostburdenLow-increnterseverehousingcostburdenUncrowdedhousingHealthOutcomesInsuredadultsArthritisAsthmaERAdmissionsHighBlo
odPressureCancer(excludingskin)
0.00.00.00.068.887.280.265.40.00.00.019.60.00.0—0.00.00.0—0.00.031.069.378.414.477.2—
32 /34
AsthmaCoronaryHeartDiseaseChronicObstructivePulmonaryDiseaseDiagnosedDiabetesLifeExpectancyatBirthCognitivelyDisabledPhysically DisabledHeartAttackERAdmissionsMentalHealthNotGoodChronicKidneyDiseaseO
besityPedestrianInjuriesPhysicalHealthNotGoodStrokeHealthRiskBehaviorsBingeDrinkingCurrentSmokerNoLeisureTimeforPhysicalActivityClimateChangeExposuresWildfireRiskSLRInundationAreaChildrenElderlyEngli
shSpeakingForeign-bornOutdoorWorkersClimateChangeAdaptiveCapacity
19.243.523.0—11.3—48.5ResultforProjectCensusTract26.079.0NoNoNoJustification
33 /34
ImperviousSurfaceCoverTrafficDensityTrafficAccessOtherIndicesHardshipOtherDecisionSupport2016VotingMetricCalEnviroScreen4.0ScoreforProjectLocation(a)HealthyPlacesIndexScoreforProjectLocation(b)Projec
tLocatedinaDesignatedDisadvantagedCommunity(SenateBill535)ProjectLocatedinaLow-IncomeCommunity(AssemblyBill1550)ProjectLocatedinaCommunityAirProtectionProgramCommunity(AssemblyBill617)Screen
a:ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.b:ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greater
than50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.NoHealth&EquityMeasuresselected.Health&EquityEvaluationScorecardnotcompleted.NoHealth&EquityCustomMeasurescreated.8.Us
erChangestoDefaultData
SeeNoteA.3
34 /34
Operations:Hearths
1 /34
2 /34
3 /34
4 /34
5 /34
Description—
Population—
SpecialLandscapeArea(sqft)—
LandscapeArea(sqft)0.00
ValueDowntownSPUpdate-Operations(2040)2040—Plan/communityCounty3.5017.633.92112919374658,-118.41555573938703LosAngeles-SouthCoastElSegundoSouthCoastAQMDSouthCoast45347SouthernCaliforniaEdisonSouthern
CaliforniaGas2022.1.1.19
6 /34
BuildingArea(sqft)130,000
LotAcreage2.98
Unit1000sqft
Size130
DataFieldProjectNameOperationalYearLeadAgencyLandUseScaleAnalysisLevelforDefaultsWindspeed(m/s)Precipitation(days)LocationCountyCityAirDistrictAirBasinTAZEDFZElectricUtilityGasUtilityAppVersionLandUs
eSubtypeStripMall
1.BasicProjectInformation
CO2e—80,900—77,736—70,220—11,626
R—40.8—4.93—17.9—2.97
———
N2O—2.57—2.68—2.41—0.40
CH4—58.1—58.1—57.8—9.58
——888
CO2T—78,640—75,478—68,039—11,265
NBCO2—78,094—74,931—67,492—11,174
———
BCO2—547—547—547—90.5
PM2.5T—20.2—20.2—17.6—3.21
0.000.000.00
PM2.5D—19.8—19.8—17.1—3.13
7 /34
PM2.5E—0.47—0.44—0.43—0.08
200,00024,000288,000
PM10T—78.4—78.4—68.0—12.4
PM10D—77.9—77.9—67.6—12.3
4.590.557.89
PM10E—0.50—0.46—0.45—0.08
SO2—0.70—0.67—0.60—0.11
1000sqft1000sqftDwellingUnit
CO—266—212—214—39.0
NOx—17.8—19.0—17.3—3.15
20024.0300
ROG—41.9—37.8—37.6—6.87
TOG—29.6—25.2—24.9—4.55
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseUn/Mit.Daily,Summer(Max)Unmit.Daily,Winter(Max)Unmit.AverageDaily(Max)Unmit.Annual(Max)Unmit.
Nomeasuresselected 2.EmissionsSummary
CO2e—70,7621097,7317791,5153.9780,900—67,7070.007,7317791,5153.9777,736—60,11774.87,7317791,515
R—36.8————3.9740.8—0.96————3.974.93—14.0————
N2O—2.21<0.0050.080.280.00—2.57—2.330.000.080.280.00—2.68—2.05<0.0050.080.280.00
CH4—2.24<0.0050.8511.743.3—58.1—2.300.000.8511.743.3—58.1—2.01<0.0050.8511.743.3
CO2T—70,0091097,687403433—78,640—66,9550.007,687403433—75,478—59,44274.57,687403433
NBCO2—70,0091097,6872890.00—78,094—66,9550.007,6872890.00—74,931—59,44274.57,6872890.00
BCO2——0.00—114433—547——0.00—114433—547——0.00—114433
PM2.5T—20.00.030.20———20.2—20.00.000.20———20.2—17.40.020.20——
PM2.5D—19.8—————19.8—19.8—————19.8—17.1————
8 /34
PM2.5E—0.240.030.20———0.47—0.240.000.20———0.44—0.210.020.20——
PM10T—78.20.030.20———78.4—78.20.000.20———78.4—67.80.020.20——
PM10D—77.9—————77.9—77.9—————77.9—67.6————
PM10E—0.260.030.20———0.50—0.260.000.20———0.46—0.230.020.20——
SO2—0.69<0.0050.02———0.70—0.660.000.02———0.67—0.58<0.0050.02——
CO—23232.51.81———266—2100.001.81———212—19022.31.81——
NOx—15.00.292.58———17.8—16.40.002.58———19.0—14.50.202.58——
ROG—22.619.10.14———41.9—22.615.10.14———37.8—19.617.90.14——
TOG—25.04.300.29———29.6—24.90.000.29———25.2—21.72.950.29——
SectorDaily,Summer(Max)MobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalDaily,Winter(Max)MobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalAverageDailyMobileAreaEnergyWaterWaste
3.9770,220—9,95312.41,2801292510.6611,626CO2e—40,44613,6755,863
3.9717.9—2.31————0.662.97R—21.17.123.05
—2.41—0.34<0.0050.010.050.00—0.40N2O—1.260.430.18
—57.8—0.33<0.0050.141.947.17—9.58CH4—1.270.430.18
—68,039—9,84112.31,27366.671.7—11,265CO2T—40,01613,5305,801
—67,492—9,84112.31,27347.80.00—11,174NBCO2—40,01613,5305,801
—547——0.00—18.871.7—90.5BCO2————
—17.6—3.17<0.0050.04———3.21PM2.5T—11.43.871.66
—17.1—3.13—————3.13PM2.5D—11.33.821.64
9 /34
—0.43—0.04<0.0050.04———0.08PM2.5E—0.140.050.02
—68.0—12.4<0.0050.04———12.4PM10T—44.715.16.48
—67.6—12.3—————12.3PM10D—44.615.16.46
—0.45—0.04<0.0050.04———0.08PM10E—0.150.050.02
—0.60—0.11<0.005<0.005———0.11SO2—0.390.130.06
—214—34.64.060.33———39.0CO—13344.819.2
—17.3—2.650.040.47———3.15NOx—8.532.881.24
—37.6—3.583.260.03———6.87ROG—12.84.341.86
—24.9—3.960.540.05———4.55TOG—14.24.802.06
Refrig.TotalAnnualMobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuilding
4.OperationsEmissionsDetails
10,77970,762—38,69913,0845,61010,31467,707—5,9391,6607101,6439,953
5.6036.8—0.550.180.080.150.96—1.380.390.160.382.31
0.342.21—1.330.450.190.362.33—0.200.060.020.060.34
0.352.24—1.310.440.190.362.30—0.200.060.020.060.33
10,66370,009—38,27012,9395,54810,19866,955—5,8731,6427021,6259,841
10,66370,009—38,27012,9395,54810,19866,955—5,8731,6427021,6259,841
——————————————
3.0520.0—11.43.871.663.0520.0—1.890.530.230.523.17
3.0119.8—11.33.821.643.0119.8—1.870.520.220.523.13
10 /34
0.040.24—0.140.050.020.040.24—0.020.01<0.0050.010.04
11.978.2—44.715.16.4811.978.2—7.392.060.882.0412.4
11.977.9—44.615.16.4611.977.9—7.362.060.882.0312.3
0.040.26—0.150.050.020.040.26—0.030.01<0.0050.010.04
0.100.69—0.380.130.050.100.66—0.060.020.010.020.11
35.6232—12040.517.432.3210—20.65.762.475.7734.6
2.3215.0—9.353.161.362.5416.4—1.570.440.190.442.65
3.5822.6—12.84.331.863.5722.6—2.120.590.250.613.58
3.9425.0—14.14.782.053.9324.9—2.350.660.280.683.96
ApartmentsTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
CO2e—9192,5663087924,585—9192,5663087924,585—152
R——————————————
N2O—0.010.04<0.0050.010.07—0.010.04<0.0050.010.07—<0.005
CH4—0.120.320.040.100.58—0.120.320.040.100.58—0.02
CO2T—9122,5463067864,550—9122,5463067864,550—151
NBCO2—9122,5463067864,550—9122,5463067864,550—151
BCO2——————————————
PM2.5T——————————————
PM2.5D——————————————
11 /34
PM2.5E——————————————
PM10T——————————————
PM10D——————————————
PM10E——————————————
SO2——————————————
CO——————————————
NOx——————————————
ROG——————————————
TOG——————————————
LandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripM
all
42551.0131759CO2e—2501,6291951,0713,146—250
————R————————
0.01<0.005<0.0050.01N2O—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.0050.01—<0.005
0.050.010.020.10CH4—0.020.140.020.090.28—0.02
42250.6130753CO2T—2491,6251951,0683,137—249
42250.6130753NBCO2—2491,6251951,0683,137—249
————BCO2————————
————PM2.5T—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM2.5D————————
12 /34
————PM2.5E—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM10T—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM10D————————
————PM10E—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————SO2—<0.0050.01<0.0050.010.02—<0.005
————CO—0.181.140.140.361.81—0.18
————NOx—0.211.360.160.842.58—0.21
————ROG—0.010.070.010.050.14—0.01
————TOG—0.020.150.020.100.29—0.02
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMall
1,6291951,0713,146—41.427032.4177521CO2e—0.00
——————————R——
<0.005<0.005<0.0050.01—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005N2O—0.00
0.140.020.090.28—<0.0050.02<0.0050.020.05CH4—0.00
1,6251951,0683,137—41.326932.3177519CO2T—0.00
1,6251951,0683,137—41.326932.3177519NBCO2—0.00
——————————BCO2—0.00
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM2.5T—0.00
——————————PM2.5D——
13 /34
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM2.5E—0.00
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM10T—0.00
——————————PM10D——
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM10E—0.00
0.01<0.0050.010.02—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005SO2—0.00
1.140.140.361.81—0.030.210.030.070.33CO—0.00
1.360.160.842.58—0.040.250.030.150.47NOx—0.00
0.070.010.050.14—<0.0050.01<0.0050.010.03ROG—0.00
0.150.020.100.29—<0.0050.03<0.0050.020.05TOG—0.00
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalSourceDaily,Summer(Max)Hearths
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.412.4
———————————————
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.312.3
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.312.3
———0.00—0.00——0.00—0.00———0.00
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
———————————————
14 /34
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
———————————————
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——32.532.5—0.00——0.00—0.00——4.064.06
——0.290.29—0.00——0.00—0.00——0.040.04
13.71.394.0119.1—0.0013.71.3915.1—0.002.510.250.503.26
——4.304.30—0.00——0.00—0.00——0.540.54
ConsumerArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotalDaily,Winter(Max)HearthsConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsTotalAnnualHearthsConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotal
CO2e—12646639.5147779—12646639.5147779
R————————————
N2O—0.050.170.010.050.28—0.050.170.010.050.28
CH4—1.907.010.592.2011.7—1.907.010.592.2011.7
CO2T—65.324120.475.8403—65.324120.475.8403
NBCO2—46.817314.654.4289—46.817314.654.4289
BCO2—18.568.15.7721.4114—18.568.15.7721.4114
PM2.5T————————————
PM2.5D————————————
15 /34
PM2.5E————————————
PM10T————————————
PM10D————————————
PM10E————————————
SO2————————————
CO————————————
NOx————————————
ROG————————————
TOG————————————
LandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
—20.977.26.5424.3129CO2e—2573514894181,515
——————R——————
—0.010.03<0.0050.010.05N2O—0.000.000.000.000.00
—0.311.160.100.361.94CH4—7.3510.014.011.943.3
—10.839.93.3812.666.6CO2T—73.6100140120433
—7.7528.62.439.0047.8NBCO2—0.000.000.000.000.00
—3.0511.30.963.5518.8BCO2—73.6100140120433
——————PM2.5T——————
——————PM2.5D——————
16 /34
——————PM2.5E——————
——————PM10T——————
——————PM10D——————
——————PM10E——————
——————SO2——————
——————CO——————
——————NOx——————
——————ROG——————
——————TOG——————
AnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
—2573514894181,515—42.658.180.969.3251CO2e
————————————R
—0.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00N2O
—7.3510.014.011.943.3—1.221.662.311.987.17CH4
—73.6100140120433—12.216.623.119.871.7CO2T
—0.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00NBCO2
—73.6100140120433—12.216.623.119.871.7BCO2
————————————PM2.5T
————————————PM2.5D
17 /34
————————————PM2.5E
————————————PM10T
————————————PM10D
————————————PM10E
————————————SO2
————————————CO
————————————NOx
————————————ROG
————————————TOG
Daily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUse
—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.130.08
—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.130.08
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
18 /34
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
Daily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGene
ralOfficeBuilding
0.100.340.66CO2e——————
0.100.340.66R——————
———N2O——————
———CH4——————
———CO2T——————
———NBCO2——————
———BCO2——————
———PM2.5T——————
———PM2.5D——————
19 /34
———PM2.5E——————
———PM10T——————
———PM10D——————
———PM10E——————
———SO2——————
———CO——————
———NOx——————
———ROG——————
———TOG——————
MedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalEquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
20 /34
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
EquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalEquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
21 /34
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
VegetationDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e———————————————————
R———————————————————
N2O———————————————————
CH4———————————————————
CO2T———————————————————
NBCO2———————————————————
BCO2———————————————————
PM2.5T———————————————————
PM2.5D———————————————————
22 /34
PM2.5E———————————————————
PM10T———————————————————
PM10D———————————————————
PM10E———————————————————
SO2———————————————————
CO———————————————————
NOx———————————————————
ROG———————————————————
TOG———————————————————
SpeciesDaily,Summer(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—Daily,Winter(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—AnnualAvoidedSubtotal
—————
—————
VMT/Year21,058,5325,886,0402,518,0535,817,883
—————
—————
VMT/Sunday29,0451,53137312,606
—————
—————
VMT/Saturday59,7684,8342,24915,134
—————
—————
VMT/Weekday63,01021,3049,13416,767
—————
Unmitigated(number)—00
23 /34
—————
Trips/Year1,925,589538,219230,250566,271
—————
—————
Trips/Sunday2,65614034.11,227
—————
—————
Trips/Saturday5,4654422061,473
—————
—————
Trips/Weekday5,7621,9488351,632
—————
—————
SequestSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—LandUseTypeStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseHearthTypeApartmentsMidRiseWoodFireplacesGasFireplaces
5.ActivityData
NaturalGas(kBTU/yr)778,3035,069,293608,3153,332,053
ParkingAreaCoated(sqft)—
Value0.00250N2O0.00400.00400.00400.0040
Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)177,000
0000000CH40.03300.03300.03300.0330
24 /34
Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)531,000
Unitday/yrday/yrCO2261261261261
ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)194,400
Electricity(kWh/yr)1,276,7783,564,057427,6871,099,750
PropaneFireplacesElectricFireplacesNoFireplacesConventionalWoodStovesCatalyticWoodStovesNon-CatalyticWoodStovesPelletWoodStovesResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)583200SeasonSnowDaysSummerDaysLandUse
StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRise
TimesServiced18.01.00
ServiceLeakRate4.000.00
OutdoorWater(gal/year)0.000.000.000.00Cogeneration(kWh/year)————
OperationsLeakRate4.001.00
Quantity(kg)<0.0050.04
25 /34
GWP2,0881,430
IndoorWater(gal/year)9,629,42835,546,7503,011,53311,182,140Waste(ton/year)137186259222
RefrigerantR-410AR-134a
EquipmentTypeOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsStand-aloneretailrefrigeratorsandfreezers
LandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseLandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseLandUseTypeStripMallStripMall
20.01.0018.01.0018.010.01.00
LoadFactorLoadFactor
AnnualHeatInput(MMBtu/yr)
7.500.004.000.004.002.500.00
HorsepowerHorsepower
DailyHeatInput(MMBtu/day)
7.500.604.000.604.002.500.60
HoursPerDayHoursperYear
<0.0050.02<0.0050.45<0.005<0.0050.12BoilerRating(MMBtu/hr)
26 /34
NumberperDayHoursperDay
3,9221,4302,0881,4302,0882,0881,430
Number
EngineTierNumberperDay
R-404AR-134aR-410AR-134aR-410AR-410AR-134a
FuelType
FuelTypeFuelType
Walk-inrefrigeratorsandfreezersHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezersOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezersOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsAverageroomA/C&OtherresidentialA/Can
dheatpumpsHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezers
StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseApartmentsMidRiseEquipmentTypeEquipmentTypeEquipmentType
FinalAcresNaturalGasSaved(btu/year)
FinalAcresUnitannualdaysofextremeheat
FuelTypeInitialAcresElectricitySaved(kWh/year)
27 /34
InitialAcresResultforProjectLocation0.00
VegetationSoilTypeNumber
EquipmentTypeVegetationLandUseTypeBiomassCoverTypeTreeTypeClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeat
6.ClimateRiskDetailedReport Cal-Adaptmidcentury2040–2059averageprojectionsforfourhazardsarereportedbelowforyourprojectlocation.TheseareunderRepresentationConcentrationPathway(RCP)8.5whichassumesGHGem
issionswillcontinuetorisestronglythrough2050andthenplateauaround2100.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
annualdayswithprecipitationabove20mmmetersofinundationdepthannualhectaresburned
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
28 /34
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
0.000.000.00
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradation
TemperatureandExtremeHeatdataareforgridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Theprojectionisbasedonthe98thhistoricalpercentileofdailymaximum/minimumtemperaturesfromobservedhistoricaldata(32climatemodelens
emblefromCal-Adapt,2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5). Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.ExtremePrecipitationdataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Thethresholdof20mmisequ
ivalenttoabout¾aninchofrain,whichwouldbelighttomoderaterainfallifreceivedoverafulldayorheavyrainifreceivedoveraperiodof2to4hours.Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.SeaLevelRised
ataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromRadkeetal.(2017),asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderdifferentincrementsofsealevelrisecoupledwithextrem
estormevents.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialinundationdepthforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier
(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis50meters(m)by50m,orabout164feet(ft)by164ft.Wildfiredataarefor
thegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromUCDavis,asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderhistoricaldataofclimate,vegetation,populationdensity,andlarge(>400ha
)firehistory.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialwildfireprobabilitiesforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer
/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.Thesensitivi
tyscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectrefer
stoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalcu
latedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresdonotincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectCensusTract—32.172.095.68.9548.90.00
29 /34
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradationIndicatorExposureIndicatorsAQ-OzoneAQ-PMAQ-DPMDrinkingWaterLeadRiskH
ousingPesticides
Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofa
projectreferstoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilitysc
oresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.7.HealthandEquityDetails ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscor
eis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
89.962.7—58.669.298.758.739.0—12.822.019.6—6.5233.24.5923.758.4ResultforProjectCensusTract—82.856409692.634415571.46156807—
30 /34
ToxicReleasesTrafficEffectIndicatorsCleanUpSitesGroundwaterHazWasteFacilities/GeneratorsImpairedWaterBodiesSolidWasteSensitivePopulationAsthmaCardio-vascularLowBirthWeightsSocioeconomicFactorIndicato
rsEducationHousingLinguisticPovertyUnemploymentIndicatorEconomicAbovePovertyEmployedMedianHIEducation
ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
79.8280508110035.76286411—74.5797510669.25445913—91.0817400257.05119979—23.3286282681.3550622445.617862182.3995893754.632362376—17.6825356176.697035878.7373283795.3933016859.34813294—73.784165280.084
.50.00.0
31 /34
Bachelor'sorhigherHighschoolenrollmentPreschoolenrollmentTransportationAutoAccessActivecommutingSocial2-parenthouseholdsVotingNeighborhoodAlcoholavailabilityParkaccessRetaildensitySupermarketaccessTr
eecanopyHousingHomeownershipHousinghabitabilityLow-inchomeownerseverehousingcostburdenLow-increnterseverehousingcostburdenUncrowdedhousingHealthOutcomesInsuredadultsArthritisAsthmaERAdmissionsHighBlo
odPressureCancer(excludingskin)
0.00.00.00.068.887.280.265.40.00.00.019.60.00.0—0.00.00.0—0.00.031.069.378.414.477.2—
32 /34
AsthmaCoronaryHeartDiseaseChronicObstructivePulmonaryDiseaseDiagnosedDiabetesLifeExpectancyatBirthCognitivelyDisabledPhysically DisabledHeartAttackERAdmissionsMentalHealthNotGoodChronicKidneyDiseaseO
besityPedestrianInjuriesPhysicalHealthNotGoodStrokeHealthRiskBehaviorsBingeDrinkingCurrentSmokerNoLeisureTimeforPhysicalActivityClimateChangeExposuresWildfireRiskSLRInundationAreaChildrenElderlyEngli
shSpeakingForeign-bornOutdoorWorkersClimateChangeAdaptiveCapacity
19.243.523.0—11.3—48.5ResultforProjectCensusTract26.079.0NoNoNoJustification
33 /34
ImperviousSurfaceCoverTrafficDensityTrafficAccessOtherIndicesHardshipOtherDecisionSupport2016VotingMetricCalEnviroScreen4.0ScoreforProjectLocation(a)HealthyPlacesIndexScoreforProjectLocation(b)Projec
tLocatedinaDesignatedDisadvantagedCommunity(SenateBill535)ProjectLocatedinaLow-IncomeCommunity(AssemblyBill1550)ProjectLocatedinaCommunityAirProtectionProgramCommunity(AssemblyBill617)Screen
a:ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.b:ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greater
than50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.NoHealth&EquityMeasuresselected.Health&EquityEvaluationScorecardnotcompleted.NoHealth&EquityCustomMeasurescreated.8.Us
erChangestoDefaultData
SeeNoteA.3
34 /34
Operations:Hearths
Downtown Specific Plan Update
CalEEMod Notes
Note A.1 /ƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷźƚƓ ƦŷğƭĻƭ ǞĻƩĻ ƒƚķźŅźĻķ Ʒƚ ƩĻƦƩĻƭĻƓƷ ğ ƭĭĻƓğƩźƚ źƓ Ǟŷźĭŷ ĭƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷźƚƓ ƦŷğƭĻƭ ŅƚƩ
ƷŷĻ ŭźǝĻƓ ƌğƓķ ǒƭĻƭ ƚĭĭǒƩ ƭźƒǒƌƷğƓĻƚǒƭƌǤ͵ ŷĻ ķĻƒƚƌźƷźƚƓͲ ŭƩğķźƓŭͲ ğƓķ ğƩĭŷźƷĻĭƷǒƩğƌ ĭƚğƷźƓŭƭ
ƦŷğƭĻƭ ǞĻƩĻ ĻǣƷĻƓķĻķ Ʒƚ ƚƓĻ ƒƚƓƷŷ Ʒƚ ƒƚƩĻ ƩĻğƌźƭƷźĭğƌƌǤ ƩĻŅƌĻĭƷ ƷŷĻ ƌĻǝĻƌƭ ƚŅ ķĻƒƚƌźƷźƚƓͲ
ŭƩğķźƓŭͲ ğƓķ ĭƚğƷźƓŭƭ ƷŷğƷ Ǟƚǒƌķ ĬĻ ƩĻƨǒźƩĻķ ŅƚƩ ĭƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷźƚƓ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ŭźǝĻƓ ƌğƓķ ǒƭĻƭͲ ĬğƭĻķ
ƚƓ ƷŷĻ ĭƚƓƭǒƌƷğƓƷƭ ĻǣƦĻƩźĻƓĭĻ͵
Note A.2 Iğǒƌ ƷƩźƦ ƌĻƓŭƷŷƭ ǞĻƩĻ ĭƚƓƭĻƩǝğƷźǝĻƌǤ źƓĭƩĻğƭĻķ Ʒƚ ЍЉ ƒźƌĻƭ ΛƚƓĻ ǞğǤΜ Ʒƚ ƩĻŅƌĻĭƷ ğ ƩğƓŭĻ ƚŅ
ƦƚƭƭźĬƌĻ ƌğƓķŅźƌƌƭ ƚƩ ƩĻĭĻźǝźƓŭ ƌƚĭğƷźƚƓƭͲ ğƭ ƷŷĻǤ ğƩĻ ƓƚƷ ƉƓƚǞƓ ğƷ Ʒŷźƭ ƷźƒĻ͵
Note A.3 wĻƭźķĻƓƷźğƌ ƌğƓķ ǒƭĻƭ Ǟƚǒƌķ ƓƚƷ ĭƚƓƷğźƓ ŷĻğƩƷŷƭ ƚƩ ǞƚƚķƭƷƚǝĻƭ͵
APPENDIX D: CULTURAL RESOURCES
APPENDIX D.2: PALEONTOLOGICAL
RESOURCES LETTER
Research & Collections
e-mail: paleorecords@nhm.org
December 11, 2022
EcoTierra Consulting
Attn: Katrina Hardt-Holoch
re: Paleontological resources for an unnamed Project in Downtown El Segundo, California
Dear Katrina:
I have conducted a thorough search of our paleontology collection records for the locality and specimen
data for proposed development at the project area as outlined on the portion of the Venice USGS
topographic quadrangle map that you sent to me via e-mail on December 6, 2022. We do not have any
fossil localities that lie directly within the proposed project area, but we do have fossil localities nearby
from the same sedimentary deposits that occur in the proposed project area, either at the surface or at
depth.
The following table shows the closest known localities in the collection of the Natural History
Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLA).
Locality
Number Location Formation Taxa Depth
El Segundo Power
Generating Station; Marine Terrace (late
Water line trench on Pleistocene;
Franklin Ave., massive, light brown
Pismo clam (Tivela stultorum)
LACM IP approx. 10 feet E of to reddish-brown
34957 Standard St. sand) and other invertebrates 3 feet bgs
Palos Verdes Sand /
San Pedro
Formation (well
LACM IP El Segundo power bedded, yellow-tan 20 feet
34958 generating station to green-grey sand) Invertebrates (unspecified) bgs
Los Angeles Unknown formation 25 feet
LACM VP 3264 International Airport (Pleistocene sands) Elephant clade (Proboscidea) bgs
Westchester, NW of
intersection of West Unknown formation
Century Blvd & (Pleistocene; silty 40 feet
Mammoth (Mammuthus)
LACM VP 7332 Bellanca Ave sand) bgs
Unknown
8734 Bellanca (Pleistocene;
Avenue, pebbly gray-green 14 feet
Mammoth (Mammuthus)
LACM VP 3789 Westchester to brown mud that bgs
directly overlies a
gray-green fine
sand)
Unknown formation
(Pleistocene,
massive sandy
SE corner of Airport mudstone w
Mammoth (Mammuthus); bison
Blvd. & Manchester scattered pieces of 16 feet
(Bison); hare (Lepus)
LACM VP 4942 Ave gravel) bgs
VP, Vertebrate Paleontology; IP, Invertebrate Paleontology; bgs, below ground surface
This records search covers only the records of the NHMLA. It is not intended as a
paleontological assessment of the project area for the purposes of CEQA or NEPA. Potentially
fossil-bearing units are present in the project area, either at the surface or in the subsurface. As
such, NHMLA recommends that a full paleontological assessment of the project area be
conducted by a paleontologist meeting Bureau of Land Management or Society of Vertebrate
Paleontology standards.
Sincerely,
Alyssa Bell, Ph.D.
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
enclosure: invoice
South Central Coastal Information Center
California State University, Fullerton
Department of Anthropology MH-426
800 North State College Boulevard
Fullerton, CA 92834-6846
657.278.5395
sccic@fullerton.edu
_____________________________________________________________________________
6/26/2023 SCCIC File #: 24373.10646
Katrina Hardt-Holoch
EcoTierra Consulting
2244 Oak Grove Road, #30178
Walnut Creek CA 94598
Re: Record Search Results for Various APNs in Downtown El Segundo
The South Central Coastal Information Center received your records search request for the project area
referenced above, located on the Venice, CA USGS 7.5’ quadrangle. The following summary reflects the
results of the records search for the project area and a ½-mile radius. The search includes a review of all
recorded archaeological and built-environment resources as well as a review of cultural resource reports
on file. In addition, the California Points of Historical Interest (SPHI), the California Historical Landmarks
(SHL), the California Register of Historical Resources (CAL REG), the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP), and the California State Built Environment Resources Directory (BERD) listings were reviewed
for the above referenced project site and a ¼-mile radius. Due to the sensitive nature of cultural
resources, archaeological site locations are not released.
RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS SUMMARY
Archaeological Resources* Within project area: 0
(*see Recommendations section) Within project radius: 0
Built-Environment Resources Within project area: 1
Within project radius: 5
Reports and Studies Within project area: 3
Within project radius: 14
OHP Built Environment Resources Within project area: 22
Directory (BERD)2019 Within ¼-mile radius: 1
California Points of Historical Within project area: 0
Interest (SPHI) 2019 Within ¼-mile radius: 0
California Historical Landmarks Within project area: 0
(SHL) 2019 Within ¼-mile radius: 0
California Register of Historical Within project area: 0
Resources (CAL REG)2019 Within ¼-mile radius: 0
National Register of Historic Places Within project area: 0
(NRHP) 2019 Within ¼-mile radius: 0
HISTORIC MAP REVIEW - Redondo, CA (1896, 1944) 15’ USGS historic maps indicate that in 1896 there
was no visible development within the project area. There were two roads within the project area which
was located within the historic place name of Sausal Redondo. In 1944, there was a significant increase
in development with a dense grid-like network of roads and buildings within the project area and search
radius. The Pacific Electric rail line extends into the project area and continues eastward. There were
two water features or small lakes and several branches of the AT&SF in the southern portion of the
project search radius. Two churches and two schools were located north of the project area. Major road
names included El Segundo Blvd.
RECOMMENDATIONS
*When we report that no archaeological resources are recorded in your project area or within a specified radius around the
project area; that does not necessarily mean that nothing is there. It may simply mean that the area has not been studied
and/or that no information regarding the archaeological sensitivity of the property has been filed at this office. The reported
records search result does not preclude the possibility that surface or buried artifacts might be found during a survey of the
property or ground-disturbing activities.
The archaeological sensitivity of the project location is unknown because there are no previous studies
for the subject property. While there are currently no recorded archaeological sites within the project
area, buried resources could potentially be unearthed during project activities. Therefore, it is
recommended that a qualified archaeological consultant be retained to survey the property for cultural
resources prior to the approval of project plans. Excavation or removal of potential cultural resources
should not be attempted by project personnel.
It is also recommended that the Native American Heritage Commission be consulted to identify if any
additional traditional cultural properties or other sacred sites are known to be in the area. The NAHC
may also refer you to local tribes with particular knowledge of potential sensitivity. The NAHC and local
tribes may offer additional recommendations to what is provided here and may request an
archaeological monitor.
Finally, it is also recommended that any built-environment resources (within the project area and the
area of potential effect) be identified, recorded, and evaluated for local, state, or national significance
by a qualified architectural historian prior to the approval of project plans. This includes any human-built
resource that appears (or are known to be) more than 45 years of age.
For your convenience, you may find a professional consultant**at www.chrisinfo.org. Any
resulting reports by the qualified consultant should be submitted to the South Central Coastal
Information Center as soon as possible.
**The SCCIC does not endorse any particular consultant and makes no claims about the qualifications of any person listed.
Each consultant on this list self-reports that they meet current professional standards.
If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at
657.278.5395 Monday through Thursday 9:00 am to 3:30 pm. Should you require any additional
information for the above referenced project, reference the SCCIC number listed above when making
inquiries. Requests made after initial invoicing will result in the preparation of a separate invoice.
Thank you for using the C alifornia H istorical R esources I nformation S ystem,
Ejhjubmmz!tjhofe!
Tubdz!Tu/!
cz!Tubdz!Tu/!Kbnft!
Ebuf;!3134/17/37!
Kbnft
25;11;34!.18(11(
Isabela Kott
GIS Program Specialist
Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource
records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records
search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that
produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native
American tribes have historical resource information not in the California Historical Resources
Information System (CHRIS) Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage
Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts.
The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical
Resources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the
CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource
professionals, Native American tribes, researchers, and the public. Recommendations made by IC
coordinators or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory
only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the evaluation or opinion of the State Historic
Preservation Officer in carrying out the OHP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law.
APPENDIX E: ENERGY CALCULATIONS
Greenhouse GasesStudy
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan
UpdateProject
September 13, 2023
Greenhouse Gases Study
1. Introduction
This report evaluates the direct and indirect impacts of the El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan
Update Project (Project) related to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and global climate change.
Supporting documents such as calculation worksheets and modeling outputs are included in
the appendix to this report.
2. Project Description
The Project involves an update to the revise
the existing Specific Plan planning districts, amend General Plan and zoning designations on
eight parcels, and include mobility enhancements. The Project would include public improvements
and streetscape guidelines, private urban form criteria, permitted land uses, development
standards, mobility and infrastructure improvements, an implementation plan, and administration
processes. The Project would allow for increases of up to 130,000 square feet of retail and
restaurant uses, 200,000 square feet of office uses, 24,000 square feet of medical office uses,
and 300 residential uses. Mobility enhancements would include expanding pedestrian areas along
portions of Main Street, Richmond Street, and Grand Avenue, which could affect the number of
travel lanes on those streets. The Project would potentially relocate a portion of an existing truck
route that is located on Main Street. It proposes the potential permanent closure of a portion of
Richmond Street to vehicles, and a variety of other minor pedestrian and transit improvements
(e.g., widened sidewalks, expanded outdoor seating and dining areas, bus stop enhancements,
etc.). The Project would also include modifications to parking standards and strategies, as well
as alternatives for on-street parking. Relatedly, the Project may potentially involve the
construction of two new parking structures at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Standard
Street and the northeast corner of Richmond Street and Franklin Avenue.
3. Environmental Setting
3.1 Climate Change Background
Global climate change refers to changes in average climatic conditions on Earth as a whole,
including changes in temperature, wind patterns, precipitation, and storms. Global warming, a
related concept, is the observed increase in average temperature of Ea
atmosphere. One identified cause of global warming is an increase of GHG emissions in the
effect because Earth and the atmosphere surrounding it are similar to a greenhouse with glass
panes in that the glass allows solar radiation (sunlight) into Ea
keep the average surface temperature of Earth close to a hospitable 60 degrees Fahrenheit.
However, it is believed that excessive concentrations of anthropogenic GHG emissions in the
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
atmosphere can result in increased global mean temperatures, with associated adverse climatic
and ecological consequences.
3.2 GHG Emissions Background
GHG emissions include carbon dioxide (CO), methane (CH), nitrous oxide (NO),
242
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF), and nitrogen
6
1
trifluoride (NF). Carbon dioxide is the most abundant GHG. Other GHG emissions are less
3
abundant but have greater global warming potential than CO. Thus, emissions of other GHGs
2
are frequently expressed in their equivalent mass of CO, denoted as COe. Forest fires,
22
decomposition, industrial processes, landfills, and the consumption of fossil fuels for power
generation, transportation, heating, and cooking are the primary sources of GHG emissions.
3.3 Regulatory Framework
There are any number of agreements, strategies, policies, regulations, and standards that relate
to GHG emissions from international climate accords to local climate action plans. Below is a
impact on GHG emissions, and (2) the existing conditions under the Applicable GHG Regulations.
3.3.1 State
The State legislature, executive office, and administrative agencies have promulgated various
regulations, rules, policies, and strategies that govern GHG emissions. Below is a timeline thereof,
followed by explanations of each:
June 2005: Executive Order S-3-05 (EO S-3-05)
September 2005: Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32) (codified EO S-3-05)
August 2007: Senate Bill 97 (SB 97)
September 2008: Senate Bill 375 (SB 375)
or 2008 Scoping Plan)
August 2011: CARB adopts Supplemental Functional Equivalent Document to the Climate
May 2014: CARB adopts First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on
or 2013 Scoping Plan Update)
April 2015: Executive Order B-30-15 (EO B-30-15)
September 2016: Senate Bill 32 (SB 32) (codified EO B-30-15)
November 2017: CARB adopts the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update: The
Update
September 2018: Executive Order B-55-18 (EO B-55-18)
September 2022: Assembly Bill 1297 (AB 1297) (codified EO B-55-18)
1
As defined by California Assembly Bill (AB) 32 and Senate Bill (SB) 104.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
November 2022: CARB adopts the 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality
Update
but explanations of these regulations are nonetheless provided below for informational purposes:
SB 350, the Clean Energy and Efficiency Act of 2015
Cap-and-Trade Program
3.3.1.1 EO S-3-05
In June 2005, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed EO-S-3-05, which had the goal of
percent below 1990 levels by 2050.
3.3.1.2 AB 32
In September 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger signed the California Global Warming Solutions
Act of 2006, AB 32, into law. AB 32 committed the State to achieving the following:
2
By 2010, reduce statewide GHG emissions to 2000 levels.
By 2020, reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels.
AB 32 required the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to adopt rules and regulations that
achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG emissions reductions. The
State achieved its 2020 GHG emissions target of returning to 1990 levels four years earlier than
mandated by AB 32.
3.3.1.3 SB 97
Passed in August 2007, SB 97 required the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to
prepare and develop CEQA guidelines for the effects and/or mitigation of GHG emissions,
including effects associated with transportation and energy consumption. Subsequently, the Draft
Guidelines Amendments for Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Guidelines Amendments) were
adopted in December 2009 to address the specific obligations of public agencies when analyzing
ronment, as pursuant to CEQA.
The Guidelines Amendments do not provide thresholds of significance or any specific mitigation
measures; rather, they require a lead agency to make a good-faith effort to describe, calculate,
or estimate the amount of GHG emissions that would result from a project, to the extent possible
based on scientific and factual data. The Guidelines Amendments give discretion to the lead
agency whether to (1) use a model or methodology to quantify GHG emissions resulting from a
project, and which model or methodology to use, or (2) rely on a qualitative analysis or
performance-based standards. Additionally, three factors that should be considered in the
evaluation of the significance of GHG emissions are identified:
2
The 2010 target to reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels was not met.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
(1) The extent to which a project may increase or reduce GHG emissions as compared
to the existing environmental setting;
(2) Whether the project emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the lead
agency determines applies to the project; and
(3) The extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted
to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of
GHG emissions.
3
The California Natural Resources Agency is required to periodically update the Guidelines
Amendments to incorporate new information or criteria established by CARB pursuant to AB 32.
SB 97 applies to any environmental impact report (EIR), negative declaration, mitigated negative
declaration, or other document requirement by CEQA.
3.3.1.4 SB 375
In September 2008, Governor Schwarzenegger signed SB 375, the Sustainable Communities
and Climate Protection Act of 2008, to align regional planning for housing and transportation with
the GHG reduction goals outlined by AB 32. SB 375 requires each Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) to adopt a Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) encouraging compact
development that reduces passenger vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and trips, all for the purpose
of meeting CARB-determined regional GHG emissions reduction targets.
3.3.1.5 EO-B-30-15
In April 2015, Governor Jerry Brown issued EO B-30-15, which had the goal of reducing the
levels by 2050.
3.3.1.6 SB 32
Signed in September 2016 by Governor Brown, SB 32 updates AB 32 to include an emissions
reduction goal for the year 2030. Specifically, SB 32 requires CARB to ensure that statewide GHG
emissions are reduced to 40 percent below the 1990 level by 2030. New goals outlined in SB 32
tighter limits on the carbon content of gasoline and diesel fuel, putting more electric cars on the
road, improving energy efficiency, and curbing emissions from key industries.
3
Chrisman, California Secretary for Natural Resources, dated 13 April 2009.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
3.3.1.7 EO B-55-18
On September 10, 2018, Governor Brown issued EO B-55-18, which established a target for
California to achieve carbon net neutrality by 2045. EO B-55-18 identifies the statewide goal to
achieve and maintain carbon neutrality as soon as possible, and no later than 2045.
3.3.1.8 AB 1297
Governor Gavin Newsom codified the goals outlined in EO-B-55-18 by his signing of AB 1279 in
September 2022. AB 1279 requires the state to reduce statewide anthropogenic GHG emissions
to at least 85 percent below 1990 levels and to maintain net negative GHG emissions thereafter.
AB 1279 tasks CARB with monitoring and regulating GHG emissions to achieve this goal. AB
and most stringent GHG reduction target.
3.3.1.9 SB 350
SB 350, signed October 7, 2015, is the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015. The
objectives of SB 350 are: (1) to increase the procurement of electricity from renewable resources
from 33 percent to 50 percent by 2030, and (2) to double the energy efficiency savings in electricity
4
and natural gas final end uses of retail customers through energy efficiency and conservation.
3.3.1.10 Cap-and-Trade Program
The Scoping Plans identify the Cap-and-Trade Program as one of the strategies California will
employ to reduce GHG emissions. Under Cap-and-Trade, an overall limit on GHG emissions from
capped sectors is established, and facilities subject to the cap are able to trade permits to emit
GHGs. CARB designed and adopted the California Cap-and-Trade Project pursuant to its
authority under AB 32.
3.3.2 Climate Change Scoping Plan
3.3.2.1 AB 32 Scoping Plan
In 2008, CARB approved a Climate Change Scoping
the approach that California would take to reduce its GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, as
required by AB 32. To achieve this, CARB determined that an approximate 28.5 percent reduction
in GHG emissions would be necessary. That is, projected 2020 GHG emissions (i.e., emissions
that would occur in 2020, absent any GHG-reducing laws and regulations) would have to be
reduced by 28.5 percent.
3.3.2.2 Supplemental FED
approval of the Climate Change Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Document. In May 2011, it
s was not sufficient under
CEQA. In response to this ruling, CARB prepared a revised and expanded document, the
Supplemental FED, approved in August 2011.
4
Senate Bill 350 (2015-2016 Re. Session) Stats 2015, ch. 547.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
As part of the Supplemental FED, CARB updated the projected 2020 emissions inventory based
on then-current economic forecasts (i.e., as influenced by the economic downturn) and GHG
5
emissions reduction measures already in place. Ultimately, CARB determined that achieving the
1990 emissions levels by 2020 would require a reduction in GHG emissions of 16 percent from
business-as-usual (BAU) conditions, down from the previous 28.5 percent figure.
3.3.2.3 First Update
2020 emissions reduction mandate and determined that, by 2030, the state could reduce its GHG
emissions to levels on course with those needed to achieve the 2050 target if the state realized
6
the expected benefits of its existing policy goals. CARB further identified and developed
recommended actions for six focus areas key to achieving the 2050 target: (1) energy; (2)
transportation (vehicles/equipment, sustainable communities, housing, fuels, and infrastructure);
(3) agriculture; (4) water; (5) waste management; and (6) natural and working lands. As noted
earlier, the state achieved its 2020 target that was established by AB 32.
3.3.2.4 2017 Scoping Plan
In response to the passage of SB 32 and the identification of the 2030 GHG reduction target,
CARB adopted an update, the 2017 Scoping Plan. It built upon the successful framework
established by the AB 32 Scoping Plan and the First Update and identified new, technologically
feasible, and cost-effective strategies to ensure that the state meets its GHG reduction targets in
a way that promotes and rewards innovation, continues to foster economic growth, and delivers
improvements to the environment and public health. It includes policies to require direct GHG
as the use of lower GHG fuels, efficiency regulations, and the cap-and--
and-Trade Progr
and programs, including the following:
Addressing GHG emissions from natural and working lands of California, which include
the agriculture and forestry sectors.
Continuation of the Cap-and-Trade Program, which is expected to cover most of the 2030
reduction obligation, or approximately 34 to 79 million metric tons of CO equivalent
2
(MMTCOe).
2
5
E.g., the million-solar-roofs program, Assembly Bill 1493 (Pavley I) motor vehicle GHG emissions
standards, and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS). Pavley I, the first GHG standard in the
nation for passenger vehicles, took effect for model years starting in 2009 to 2016 and was
therefore in place at the time of the 2011 Supplemental FED.
6
The 2050 goal of reducing GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels was originally
established by Executive Order S-3-05, issued by Governor Schwarzenegger in June 2005.
However, the 2050 goal was not codified by either AB 32 or SB 32.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
-lived climate pollutants strategy, which addresses GHG emissions that
remain in the atmosphere for shorter periods of time than longer-lived GHGs like CO, is
2
expected to cover approximately 17 to 35 MMTCOe.
2
The Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) with its goal of 50 percent renewable electricity
by 2030 is expected to cover approximately 3 MMTCOe.
2
The mobile source strategy and sustainable freight action plan are expected to cover
approximately 11 to 13 MMTCOe.
2
Doubling the energy efficiency savings in natural gas and electricity end uses by 2030 that
is expected to cover approximately 7 to 9 MMTCOe of the 2030 reduction obligation.
2
Other strategies would be expected to cover the remaining 2030 reduction obligations.
reduction goals, because local governments have jurisdiction and land use authority related to
community-scale planning and permitting processes, local codes and actions, outreach and
education programs, and municipal operations. Furthermore, local governments may have the
ability to incentivize renewable energy, energy efficiency, and water efficiency measures. For
individual projects under CEQA, the 2017 Scoping Plan states that local governments can support
climate action when considering discretionary approvals and entitlements. According to the 2017
Scoping Plan, lead agencies have the discretion to develop evidence-based numeric thresholds
consistent with the -term goals, and climate change science.
However, the City of El Segundo has not developed such thresholds for CEQA use.
3.3.2.5 2022 Scoping Plan
The 2022 Scoping Plan establishes a scenario by which the State may achieve carbon neutrality
by 2045 or earlier, and it outlines a technologically feasible, cost-effective, and equity-focused
path for achieving this climate target. The 2022 Scoping Plan addresses the latest climate-related
legislation and direction from current Governor Newsom, who, by his signing of AB 1279, required
the State to reduce statewide anthropogenic GHG emissions to at least 85 percent below 1990
levels by 2045 and to maintain net negative GHG emissions thereafter. The 2022 Scoping Plan
relies on the aggressive reduction of fossil fuels in all statewide sectors and accelerating existing
Rapidly moving to zero-emission transportation by electrifying cars, buses, trains, and
trucks.
Phasing out the use of fossil gas used for heating homes and buildings.
Clamping down on chemicals, refrigerants, and other high global warming potential gases.
Providing communities with sustainable options for walking, biking, and public transit to
reduce reliance on cars.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
Continuing to develop solar arrays, wind turbine capacity, and other resources that provide
clean, renewable energy.
Scale up options such as renewable hydrogen and biomethane for end uses that are hard
to electrify.
CARB estimates that successfully achieving the outcomes called for by the 2022 Scoping Plan
will reduce demand for liquid petroleum by 94 percent and total fossil fuel by 86 percent in 2045,
relative to 2022. The 2022 Scoping Plan also emphasizes the role of natural and working lands
and carbon capturing technologies to address residual emissions and achieve net negative
emissions.
3.3.3 Regional
3.3.3.1 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy
In September 2008 Governor Schwarzenegger signed the Sustainable Communities and Climate
Protection Act of 2008, also known as SB 375, to align regional planning for housing and
transportation with the GHG emissions reduction goals outlined by AB 32. SB 375 requires each
MPO to adopt an SCS encouraging compact development that reduces passenger VMT and trips,
all for the purpose of meeting CARB-determined regional GHG emissions reduction targets.
The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is the regional planning agency for
Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties, and addresses
regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development, and the
environment. As the federally designated MPO for the six-county Southern California region,
SCAG is required by law to ensure that transportation activities conform to, and are supportive of,
regional and state air quality plan goals to attain NAAQS. SCAG is also a co-producer, with the
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), of the transportation strategy and
CARB set GHG emissions reduction targets of 8 percent by 2020 and 19 percent by 2035
(compared with 2005 levels) for the SCAG region, effective as of October 1, 2018. Adopted on
-range plan, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS serves as the roadmap
-
2045 RTP/SCS recognizes that transportation investments and future land use patterns are
inextricably linked and acknowledges how this relationship can help the region make choices that
sustain existing resources while expanding efficiency, mobility, and accessibility for people across
the region.
The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS land use pattern continues the trend of focusing new housing and
Priority Growth Areas (PGAs) and aims to enhance and build
Quality Transit Areas (HQTAs), Neighborhood Mobility Areas (NMAs), Livable Corridors, and
Spheres of Influence (SOIs) account for just 4 percent of total land in the SCAG region, but they
are projected to accommodate 64 percent of the 74 percent
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
7
5. According to the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, dense
infill development in PGAs can help reduce travel distances, increase mobility options, leverage
transit investments, and improve access to workplaces and other destinations, reducing vehicle
miles traveled (VMT) and, crucially, associated GHG emissions.
The SB 375 GHG reduction targets for the SCAG region correspond with reductions in regional
VMT per capita. OPR has recommended that achieving 15 percent lower per capita (residential)
or per employee (commercial) VMT than existing development is generally feasible and is
s.
3.3.3.2 SCAQMD CEQA Guidance
The City of El Segundo is located in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The SCAQMD is
responsible for air quality planning in the Basin and developing rules and regulations to bring the
area into attainment of the ambient air quality standards. This is accomplished through air quality
monitoring, evaluation, education, implementation of control measures to reduce emissions from
stationary sources, permitting and inspection of pollution sources, enforcement of air quality
regulations, and by supporting and implementing measures to reduce emissions from motor
vehicles.
In 2008, SCAQMD released draft guidance regarding interim CEQA GHG significance
8
thresholds. A GHG Significance Threshold Working Group was formed to
9
further evaluate potential GHG significance thresholds. The SCAQMD proposed the use of a
percent emission reduction target to determine significance for commercial/residential projects
that emit greater than 3,000 MTCOe per year. Under this proposal, commercial/residential
2
projects that emit fewer than 3,000 MTCOe per year would be assumed to have a less than
2
significant impact on climate change.
On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted the staff proposal for an interim
GHG significance threshold of 10,000 MTCOe per year for stationary source/industrial projects
2
where the SCAQMD is the lead agency. The SCAQMD has yet to adopt a GHG significance
threshold for land use development projects (e.g., residential/commercial projects) or plan level
projects. GHG thresholds for project-level analyses and GHG
efficiency thresholds for plan-level analyses were not adopted by the SCAQMD Governing Board.
The Working Group has been inactive since 2011, and SCAQMD has not formally adopted any
other GHG significance thresholds for other jurisdictions.
7
SCAG, Final 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, September 2020.
8
SCAQMD, Board Meeting, December 5, 2008. Agenda No. 31,
http://www3.aqmd.gov/hb/2008/081231.a.thm. Accessed August 9, 2023.
9
SCAQMD, Greenhouse Gases CEQA Significance Thresholds,
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/ghg-significance-
thresholds. Accessed August 9, 2023.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
3.3.4 Local
3.3.4.1 City of El Segundo Climate Action Plan
emissions, identify community-wide strategies to lower the
10
an implementation plan for these strategies. The CAP is not CEQA-qualified under the
requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5 but nevertheless identifies how the City may
implementation of five source strategies Land Use and Transportation, Energy Efficiency, Solid
Waste, Urban Greening, and Energy Generation and Storage
emissions 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.
3.3.4.2 City of El Segundo General Plan
The City does not have a General Plan Element that is specific to climate change or GHG
emissions, but the following goals, objectives, and policies would nevertheless have an indirect
effect on GHG emissions reductions:
Goal AQ1: Person Work Trip Reduction for Private Employees
Objective AQ1-1: A 30 percent reduction in private employee work trips in new and existing
development through the use of any combination of alternate work weeks
and telecommuting strategies.
Policy AQ1-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City encourage businesses
to adopt alternative work schedules and prepare guidelines to assist local
businesses in the implementation of alternative work schedule programs.
Policy AQ1-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that businesses be encouraged to
establish and maintain telecommuting or work-at-home programs to reduce
employee work trips.
Policy AQ1-1.3: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that Transportation System
Management (TSM) plans provide a 30 percent reduction in vehicle
ridership or the equivalent Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) per commute
vehicle.
Goal AQ2: Person Work Trip Reduction for Local Government Employees
Objective AQ2-1: A 30 percent reduction in local government employee work trips using any
combination of alternative work weeks and telecommuting strategies.
Policy AQ2-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that a study be conducted to
implement alternative work schedules and work-at-home programs for City
10
City of El Segundo, Climate Action Plan, December 2017.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
employees that will maximize the potential for increasing employee
productivity.
Policy AQ2-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City designate an Employee
Transportation Coordinator to promote and institute ridesharing and other
programs to achieve a 30 percent reduction in vehicle ridership for City
employees.
Goal AQ3: Vehicle Work Trip Reduction for Private Employees
Objective AQ3-1: Increase the proportion of work trips made by transit.
Policy AQ3-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City continue to require
employers in existing congested areas of the City and developers of large
new developments to adopt Transportation System Management (TSM)
plans and provide incentives for the provision of transit support facilities.
Policy AQ3-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that it continues to require
developer TSM plans to encourage trip reduction programs and
development of transit and ridesharing facilities over highway capacity
expansion in order to achieve and maintain mobility and air quality.
Policy AQ3-1.3: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo to cooperate with efforts to expand
bus, rail, and other forms of transit within the Los Angeles region.
Goal AQ4: Reduce Motorized Transportation
Objective AQ4-1: Promote non-motorized transportation.
Policy AQ4-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City actively encourage the
development and maintenance of a high-quality network of pedestrian and
bicycle routes, linked to key locations, in order to promote non-motorized
transportation.
Goal AQ5: Vehicle Work and Non-Work Trip Reduction
Objective AQ5-1: Improve transit systems serving the City and implement parking control
methods to reduce work and non-work trips.
Policy AQ5-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City discourage the use of
single-occupant vehicles in congested areas of the City by changing or
modifying the availability and cost of parking.
Policy AQ5-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City actively encourage the
enhancement of transit performance and availability and establish
developer fees to offset the costs of transit improvements required as a
result of new developments.
Goal AQ7: Reduce Vehicle Emissions Through Traffic Flow Improvements
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
Objective AQ7-1: Set annual objectives for the continued improvement of interconnected
traffic signal control systems or appropriate non-interconnected
synchronization methods on all streets where traffic volume and delay time
is significant.
Policy AQ7-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that a high priority be given to
improve the flow of traffic through synchronization of signalized
intersections, as this is among the most cost-effective means of reducing
congestion, conserving energy, and improving air quality.
Goal AQ8: Reduction in Tailpipe Emissions from Local Government Vehicle
Fleets
Objective AQ8-1: Support legislation which would improve vehicle/transportation technology
Policy AQ8-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City support legislation for
the use and ownership of clean fuel vehicles.
Policy AQ8-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City support legislation for
research, development, and demonstration of clean fuel vehicles in both
fleet service and passenger use.
Policy AQ8-1.3: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City invest in clean fuel
systems on new City fleet vehicles.
Goal AQ9: Reduction in Length of Vehicle Trips
Objective AQ9-1:
average length of commute-trips by the year 2010, as designated by
SCAG.
Policy AQ9-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City promote a better
balance of jobs and housing within the City by considering housing
proposals within areas of the City designated for Smoky Hollow Mixed-Use.
Policy AQ9-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City participate in sub
regional efforts with other cities or agencies to develop mutually beneficial
approaches to improving the balance of jobs and housing.
Policy AQ9-1.3: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City actively encourage the
establishment of a shuttle bus system to transport employees and El
Segundo residents between the east and west sides of the City.
Goal AQ11: Reduce Emissions Associated with Government Energy
Consumption
Objective AQ11-1: Reduce energy use by City government facilities with an emphasis on peak
demand reduction as stated by SCAG.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
Policy AQ11-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that a study be prepared to initiate
implementation of a program for retrofitting City buildings with a full range
of energy conservation measures.
Goal AQ12: Reduction in Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Energy
Consumption
Objective AQ12-1: Enact the recommendations of the AQMP Energy Working Group for
commercial and residential buildings and adopt ordinances to mitigate air
quality impacts from water and pool heating systems.
Policy AQ12-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that an ordinance be adopted
requiring all new swimming pool water heater systems to utilize solar,
electric, or low NOX gas-fired water heaters, and/or pool covers.
Policy AQ12-1.2: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City encourage the
incorporation of energy conservation features in the design of new projects
and the installation of conservation devices in existing developments.
Policy AQ12-1.3: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo to provide incentives and/or
regulations to reduce emissions from residential and commercial water
heating.
Policy AQ12-1.4: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that new construction not preclude
the use of solar energy systems by uses and buildings on adjacent
properties and consider enactment of a comprehensive solar access
ordinance.
Goal AQ13: Increase Recycling of Solid Waste and Use of Recycled Materials by
Glass and Paper Manufacturers
Objective AQ13-1: Reduce the amount of solid waste by 25 percent by 1994, and 50 percent
by 2000.
Policy AQ13-1.1: It is the policy of the City of El Segundo that the City continue to implement
concurrent with California Assembly Bill 939, to achieve a 25 percent
reduction in residential solid waste requiring disposal by 1995, and a 50
percent reduction by the year 2000.
Goal C2: Provisions for Alternative Modes of Transportation
Objective C2-1: Provide a pedestrian circulation system to support and encourage walking
Policy C2-1.1: Encourage the development of pedestrian linkages to and from the Metro
Green Line \[C Line\] stations to encourage and attract internodal
transit/walking trips.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
Policy C2-1.2: Develop a citywide system of pedestrian walkways, alleviating the conflict
between pedestrians, autos, and bicyclists throughout the City.
Policy C2-1.3: Encourage new developments in the City to participate in the development
of the citywide system of pedestrian walkways and require participation
funded by the project developer where appropriate.
Policy C2-1.4: Ensure the installation of sidewalks on all future arterial widening or new
construction projects, to establish a continuous and convenient link for
pedestrians.
Policy C2-1.6: Encourage shopping areas to design their facilities for ease of pedestrian
access.
Policy C2-1.7: Closely monitor design practices to ensure a clear pedestrian walking area
by minimizing obstructions, especially in the vicinity of intersections.
Objective C2-2: Provide a bikeway system throughout the City to support and encourage
circulation system.
Policy C2-2.2: Encourage new development to provide facilities for bicyclists to park and
store their bicycles and provide shower and clothes changing facilities at or
Policy C2-2.3: Develop off-street bicycle paths in corridors where appropriate throughout
the City.
Policy C2-2.4: Encourage the use of bicycles for trips to and from elementary, middle, and
high schools in the area as well as parks, libraries, and other public
facilities.
Policy C2-2.5: Continue coordination of bicycle route planning and implementation with
adjacent jurisdictions and regional agencies.
Policy C2-2.6: Encourage design of new streets with the potential for Class I or Class II
bicycle routes that separate the automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian to the
maximum extent feasible.
Policy C2-2.8: Evaluate bikeway system links with the Metro Green Line \[C Line\] rail
stations and improve access wherever feasible.
Objective C2-3: Ensure the provision of a safe and efficient transit system that will offer the
residents, workers, and visitors of El Segundo a viable alternative to the
automobile.
Policy C2-3.1: Work closely with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority (MTA), Torrance Municipal Bus Lines, the El Segundo Employers
Association (ESEA), and private businesses to expand and improve the
public transit service within and adjacent to the City.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
Policy C2-3.2: Ensure that transit planning is considered and integrated into all related
elements of City planning.
Objective C2-4: Ensure the use of Transportation System Management (TSM) measures
efficient and cost effective as possible.
Policy C2-4.2: Continue to increase operational efficiencies of the transportation system
by implementing all appropriate TSM measures, including but not limited to
improving design standards, upgrading and coordination of traffic control
devices, controlling on-street parking, and using sophisticated electronic
control methods to supervise the flow of traffic.
Objective C2-5: Ensure the use of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures
throughout the City, where appropriate, to discourage the single-occupant
vehicle, particularly during the peak hours. In addition, ensure that any
developments that are approved based on TDM plans incorporate
monitoring and enforcement of TDM targets as part of those plans.
Policy C2-5.1: Ensure that TDM measures are considered during the evaluation of new
developments within the City, including but not limited to ridesharing,
carpooling and vanpooling, flexible work schedules, telecommuting and
car/vanpool preferential parking.
Policy C2-5.3: Encourage the provision of preferential parking for high occupancy vehicles
wherever possible.
Policy C3-1.4: Encourage development projects that effectively integrate major
transportation facilities with land use planning and the surrounding
environment. These joint uses will obtain economic and aesthetic benefits
of coordinated design, achieve land conservation in space-short urban
areas of El Segundo, and maintain neighborhood continuity in built-up
areas affected by future major transportation routes.
Policy C3-1.5: Ensure that transit planning is considered and integrated into all related
elements of City Planning.
Policy C3-1.8: Require the provision of adequate pedestrian and bicycle access for new
development projects through the development review process.
3.3.4.3 City of El Segundo Municipal Code
The City of El Segundo Municipal Code contains various provisions addressing water
conservation, transportation demand management, and EV charging that would have an indirect
effect on GHG reduction. For example, Chapter 13-21 provides a streamlined permitting process
for EV charging stations throughout the City. Chapter 15-16 establishes requirements for major
new developments to provide facilities that encourage and accommodate the use of ridesharing,
transit, pedestrian, and bicycle commuting as alternatives to single occupant motor vehicle trips.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
3.4 Existing Conditions
3.4.1 Existing Statewide GHG Emissions
CARB reports that in 2019, emissions from GHG emissions statewide were 404 MMTCOe, 27
2
MMTCOe. The transportation sector was the
22
when including upstream transportation emissions from the refinery and oil and gas industrial
sectors. The commercial and residential sectors accounted for approximately 10 percent of GHG
emissions. Agriculture accounted for approximately 8 percent, and electricity generation
accounted for approximately 20 percent. Remaining emissions came from sectors such as non-
transportation fuel-related industrial sources, recycling and waste management, and from high
global warming potential gases.
In 2021, approximately 52 percent of electricity generation serving California came from
renewable and zero-carbon resources (e.g., solar and wind).
4. Project Impacts
4.1 Thresholds of Significance
4.1.1 State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G
In Accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Project would have a
significant impact related to GHGs if it would:
a) Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs?
4.2 Methodology
4.2.1 Consistency Analysis
To evaluate pursuant to the two Appendix G checklist
questions, the City uses a qualitative analysis that assesses the
following plans, policies, and regulations adopted to reduce GHG emissions:
-2045 RTP/SCS
EO B-55-18, AB 1279, and the 2022 Scoping Plan
City of El Segundo Climate Action Plan
Additionally, to comply with the requirements of CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.4(a), the
analysis includes a good faith estimate of GHG emissions that may result from the Project.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
Neither the City nor the SCAQMD has adopted GHG significance thresholds for plan-level
projects. SCAQMD has adopted significance thresholds for industrial-type projects for which it is
the lead agency, but the SCAQMD industrial thresholds are not relevant to the Project. Moreover,
the SCAQMD is not the lead agency for the Project, and the City has n
emissions is evaluated consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(b) by considering
whether the Project would conflict with applicable regulations or requirements adopted to
implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions.
For this Project, as a land use planning project, the most directly applicable adopted regulatory
plan to reduce GHG emissions is the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, which is designed to achieve regional
GHG reductions from the land use and transportation sectors as required by SB 375 and the
-term climate goals. This analysis also considers qualitative consistency with the 2022
Scoping Plan Climate Action Plan. With respect to EO B-55-18 and AB
GHG emissions reduction goals, which is a target of 85 percent below 1990 levels by 2045. In
the EO B-55-18 and AB 1279 GHG emissions reduction goals. Climate Action Plan,
while not a qualified CAP under CEQA, also outlines strategies that would aid in the achievement
of the State GHG reduction goals.
4.2.2 Quantification of Project GHG Emissions
By amending the land use designation and zoning on eight parcels within the Specific Plan area,
the Downtown Specific Plan Update would facilitate construction of projects within the Specific
Plan area through 2040. GHG emissions associated with the construction and operations of these
future projects were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model version 2022
(CalEEMod). Construction of projects facilitated by the Downtown Specific Plan Update would
generate GHG emissions due to the use of diesel-powered equipment and construction vehicles
throughout the implementation period through 2040. Construction electricity consumption would
also result in GHG emissions. The exact location and types of future development are not known,
but the general location and types of development can be reasonably anticipated. For example,
projects would likely be concentrated along Main Street and would consist mainly of low-rise or
mid-rise buildings, in accordance with existing and proposed site-development standards for the
construction, paving, and architectural coatings activities. The magnitude of construction-related
GHG emissions would be dependent on project-specific factors that are not known at this time
(e.g., the types and quantify of equipment utilized by projects, the number of construction vehicle
trips generated by projects, etc.), but given the allowable uses and typical construction activities,
-related GHG emissions with
CalEEMod, which draws on extensive construction survey data of construction equipment,
construction equipment emissions, construction phase lengths, and other factors to estimate
emissions. The analysis estimates GHG emissions that would be associated with full buildout of
square feet of retail and restaurant uses, 200,000 square feet of
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
office space, 24,000 square feet of medical office space, and 300 residential units. Construction
assumptions are provided in the appendix to this report. Operations-related assumptions are also
provided in the appendix. The analysis addresses GHG emissions from the following operational
sources that would be associated with the aforementioned land uses:
Area Sources: Emissions associated with the on-site use of powered equipment.
Energy Sources: Emissions associated with electricity and natural gas use for space
heating and cooling, water heating, energy consumption, and lighting.
Mobile Sources: Emissions associated with a related vehicle travel.
Water/Wastewater Sources: Emissions associated with energy used to pump, convey,
delivery, and treat water.
Solid Waste Sources: Emissions associated with the disposal of solid waste into landfills.
Refrigerant Sources: Emissions associated with fugitive GHG emissions related to
building air conditioning and refrigeration equipment.
A fundamental difficulty in the analysis of GHG emissions is the global nature of existing and
cumulative future conditions. Changes in GHG emissions can be difficult to attribute to a particular
planning program or project because the planning effort or project may cause a shift in the locale
increase, reduction, or no change in GHGs that would existing if the project were not implemented.
For example, if a multi-family residential project replaces an existing supermarket, GHG
emissions associated with the existing supermarket would not be totally eliminated because
former patrons of the supermarket would still drive and get groceries somewhere else, which
would continue to generate associated GHG emissions. GHG emissions associated with the new
multi-family residential project would not be totally new, because many residents will have
presumably moved there from other housing. Their GHG emissions would be shifted from their
old housing to their new housing, but if the new multi-family residential project has access to high
quality transit and walkable destinations, then there is a strong likelihood
per capita would be reduced on average by their move to the new project. Notwithstanding these
complexitiesbecause it assumes all
direct and indirect GHG emissions would be new additions to the atmosphere.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
5. Analysis of Project Impacts
5.1 Threshold a):
Would the project generate GHG emissions, either directly
or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
Threshold b):
Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the
emissions of GHG?
As described above, consistency with applicable GHG emissions reduction plans would result in
a less than significant impact. The following section describes the extent to which the Project is
consistent with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, the 2022 Scoping Plan Update, and the Climate
Action Plan. As demonstrated below, the Project would be consistent with these plans, and its
GHG impact would therefore be less than significant.
5.1.1 2020-2045 RTP/SCS
-2045 RTP/SCS (Connect SoCal) is expected to help the
SCAG region, and in turn California, reach its latest GHG reduction goals. Implementation of the
2020-2045 RTP/SCS is projected to reduce per capita vehicle GHG emissions by 19 percent by
2035, thus enabling the region to fulfill its portion of SB 375 compliance. Implementation is also
projected to reduce daily VMT per capita by 5 percent by 2045.
Generally, projects are considered consistent with the provisions of regional land use plans and
regulations if they are compatible with the general intent of the plans and would not preclude the
attainment of their primary goals. The land use pattern emphasized by the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS
involves concentrating new, dense housing and/or job growth in infill locations and PGAs in an
effort to facilitate alternative transportation modes and reduce vehicle trips and VMT. As explained
earlier, PGAs such as Job Centers, Transit Priority Areas (TPAs), High Quality Transit Areas
(HQTAs), Neighborhood Mobility Areas (NMAs), Livable Corridors, and Spheres of Influence
-2045
RTP/SCS anticipates that 64 percent of new household growth and 74 percent of employment
growth will occur in these PGAs. The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS supports this concentration of new
growth within PGAs: according to the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, dense infill development in PGAs can
reduce travel distances, increase mobility options, increase workplace accessibility, leverage
-2045 RTP/SCS
emphasizes new infill construction in PGAs and assumes a significant increase in development
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
in such locations, in some cases outpacing what is currently anticipated by local general plans.
Projects fitting this land use pattern are consistent with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS.
The Downtown Specific Plan Update aims to achieve or bolster this land use pattern within the
Specific Plan area. First, the Specific Plan area is already designated a NMA. The 2020-2045
RTP/SCS targets growth in NMAs because of NMAs robust residential to non-residential land use
connections and high roadway intersection densities. These features promote safer, multimodal,
short trips and can reduce reliance on single occupancy vehicles, reducing VMT and
corresponding GHG emissions. Public engagement data for this Specific Plan Update supports
this: almost ninety percent of survey respondents listed walking as one of their typical travel
modes for accessing the Downtown area. On this basis alone, development of the Project and its
land uses within the Specific Plan area would be consistent with the 2020-
to emphasize dense infill development within PGAs. Second, the Project proposes a range of
transportation and mobility improve
promote alternative transportation modes. For example, the Project proposes the following
improvements:
Pedestrian crossing enhancements at 12 locations
Area-wide sidewalk curb ramp enhancements
Bicycle mobility enhancements on two roadway segments
Area-wide bicycle accommodation and wayfinding enhancements
Bus stop enhancements at six existing bus stops
Signal operation enhancements on two roadway segments
Area-wide intersection control improvements (signage and striping)
In-road bollard receptacles for temporary street closures at two locations
Area-wide on-street parking striping enhancements
Area-wide off-street parking optimization enhancements
By implementing these transportation and mobility improvements and by focusing dense new
retail, commercial, and residential uses within a PGA, the Project fits the land use pattern adopted
and emphasized by the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS and would not interfere with its VMT reduction goals
or its corresponding GHG reduction target.
5.1.2 2022 Scoping Plan Update
As explained earlier, the 2022 Scoping Plan addresses the recent signing of AB 1279, which
codified EO-B-55-
(equivalent to a reduction in statewide anthropogenic GHG emissions of 85 percent below 1990
levels). The 2022 Scoping Plan establishes a scenario by which the State may achieve this goal
by 2045 or earlier.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
Implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan Update would allow for an additional 130,000
square feet of retail and restaurant land uses, 200,000 square feet of office space, 24,000 square
feet of medical office space, and 300 residential units to be developed within the Specific Plan
area. However, as explained, the Downtown Specific Plan Update does not propose any actual
land use development project-specific attributes and
considerations have limited applicability to the Project. Nevertheless, the Project is clearly
-level projects. The
particularly in high-resource and low-
It explains:
particularly those already displaying efficient resident travel patterns, have the greatest
potential to reduce emissions while also reducing combined housing and transportation
costs for Californians and infrastructure costs for local governments due to avoided new
roads, public schools, and other sprawl supporting infrastructure. Infill housing
development alleviates pressure to develop on the urban periphery, preserving natural
-
-smart locations include neighborhoods, commercial corridors, town centers,
downtowns, and other areas where residents have access to a broad range of mobility
options in addition to private automobiles (such as transit, walking, and biking), as well as
where residents have access to housing, jobs, and other key destinations. Such
communities make it possible for residents to live, work, and recreate without dependence
on a personal car. For trips where driving is required, car trips can be relatively short and
public infrastructure should support the use of zero-emission vehicles.
The Downtown Specific Plan Update is consistent with these land use strategies to support
-The Specific Plan Area is designated a
-2045 RTP/SCS, and it is a downtown/town center-type neighborhood with
high walkability and accessibility to a range of destinations. The Downtown Specific Plan Update
would encourage compact urban infill projects in this neighborhood that are designed to leverage
and add to and pedestrian environment.
Additionally, the Downtown Specific Plan Update also proposes a range of transportation and
mobility improvements that would further
alternative transportation modes. As listed earlier, the Project proposes the following
improvements:
Pedestrian crossing enhancements at 12 locations
Area-wide sidewalk curb ramp enhancements
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
Bicycle mobility enhancements on two roadway segments
Area-wide bicycle accommodation and wayfinding enhancements
Bus stop enhancements at six existing bus stops
Signal operation enhancements on two roadway segments
Area-wide intersection control improvements (signage and striping)
In-road bollard receptacles for temporary street closures at two locations
Area-wide on-street parking striping enhancements
Area-wide off-street parking optimization enhancements
-
area. Overall, projects such as the Downtown Specific Plan Update are part of the solution for
achieving the land use and transportation-related GHG reductions necessary to achieve the
or obstruct
implementation of the 2022 Scoping
targets under EO B-55-18 and AB 1279.
5.1.3 City of El Segundo Climate Action Plan
-qualified under the requirements of CEQA
Guidelines Section 15183.5 but nevertheless identifies how the City may reduce its GHG
emissions in line with the targets. The CAP determines that implementation of five
source strategies Land Use and Transportation, Energy Efficiency, Solid Waste, Urban
Greening, and Energy Generation and Storage
percent below 1990 levels by 2050. The CAP includes a long list of goals, measures, and sub-
strategies under each of the five source strategies, many of which would not apply to the Project,
which does not propose any actual land use development project. Table 1
consistency with relevant measures.
Table 1
Consistency Analysis:
City of El Segundo Climate Action Plan
Measure Project Consistency
Source Strategy: Land Use and Transportation (LUT)
LUT A5: Multi-Modal Streets Complete Streets Consistent. This strategy involves encouraging
multi-modal streets that accommodate
Neighborhood Electric Vehicles that travel at
speeds of 25 miles per hour or less by
accommodating them on high-speed streets or
integrating them with other slow-speed
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
Table 1
Consistency Analysis:
City of El Segundo Climate Action Plan
Measure Project Consistency
infrastructure such as protected bike lanes. The
Project would implement complete streets
strategies within the Specific Plan area that
promote traffic calming and integration with
pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
LUT B1: Facilitate Private and Public Mobility Consistent.
Services (Ride-Hailing, Ride-Sharing, Car-enhancements could help leverage future bike-
Sharing, Bike-Sharing) sharing programs within the City.
LUT C1: Provide a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Consistent. By allowing increases in land use
System densities within the Specific Plan area, the Project
would promote transit supportive densities
capable of supporting future BRT service. The
enhancements could also help leverage future
BRT service to the Specific Plan area.
LUT C2: Expand Transit Network Consistent. Similarly, by allowing increases in
land use densities within the Specific Plan area,
the Project would promote transit supportive
densities that could support future transit
expansion and other transit investment within the
Specific Plan area.
LUT D1: Provide Traffic Calming Measures Consistent. The streetscape design and
elements implemented by the Project (e.g.,
bollards, wider sidewalks, etc.) would promote
traffic calming and encourage walking, biking, and
outdoor dining.
LUT D2: Provide Pedestrian/Bicycle Networks Consistent. The Project would include numerous
Improvements pedestrian and bicycle mobility improvements that
are listed previously in this report. A central goal
of the Project is to promote walking and biking
within the Specific Plan area.
LUT D3: Improve Design of Development Consistent. A central goal of the Project is to
implement development standards that enhance
walking and biking within the Specific Plan area
(e.g., building placement, maximum heights,
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
Table 1
Consistency Analysis:
City of El Segundo Climate Action Plan
Measure Project Consistency
setbacks, relationship to streets and sidewalks,
etc.).
LUT E1: Limit Parking Supply Consistent. The Project promotes strategies
such as shared parking agreements between
businesses to maximize parking efficiency.
LUT G1: Increase Density Consistent. The Project would encourage higher
density by allowing additional retail, restaurant,
office, medical office, and residential uses in the
Specific Plan area.
LUT G2: Increase Diversity Consistent. The Project would encourage a mix
of compatible retail, commercial, and residential
uses within the Specific Plan area.
LUT G3: Increase Destination Accessibility Consistent. The Project involves a downtown
neighborhood with a high density of retail and
commercial
enhancements would increase accessibility to
destinations within and surrounding the Specific
Plan area.
LUT G4: Increase Transit Accessibility Consistent. The Project includes pedestrian and
bicycle mobility enhancements, as well as bus
stop improvements, that would increase transit
accessibility.
Source Strategy: Energy Efficiency (EE)
EE F1: Promote Tree Planting for Shading and Consistent. The Project
Energy Efficiency would promote street trees, shade trees, and
landscaping.
EE I2: Upgrade or Incorporate Water-Conserving Consistent. The Project would utilize drought-
Landscape tolerant and California native plants to reduce
irrigation and conserve water.
EE I3: Plant Trees for Shade and Carbon Consistent.
Sequestration would promote street trees, shade trees, and
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
Table 1
Consistency Analysis:
City of El Segundo Climate Action Plan
Measure Project Consistency
landscaping that can reduce surface temperatures
and sequester CO.
2
Source: City of El Segundo, Climate Action Plan, December 2017.
5.1.4 Consistency Analysis - Conclusion
In summary, the Project would be consistent with 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, 2022 Scoping Plan
Update, and City of El Segundo Climate Action Plan efforts and strategies to reduce GHG
emissions in accordance with the latest and most stringent AB 1279 and SB 375 targets. As a
less than
significant.
5.2 Project Emissions
5.2.1 Construction
As explained earlier, construction of projects facilitated by the Downtown Specific Plan Update
could occur through 2040.
associated with 10 percent of buildout allowed under the Project (i.e., 20,000 square feet of the
allowable 200,000 square feet increase in office uses, etc.) were estimated using CalEEMod.
Table 2 shows the results of this 10 percent buildout scenario and multiplies the GHG emissions
allowable land use increases. As shown, construction of 100 percent
allowable land use increases is estimated to generate approximately 34,400 MTCOe. As
2
recommended by the SCAQMD, the total construction-related GHG emissions were amortized
over a 30-year project lifetime (i.e., divided by 30). This results in annual Project construction
emissions of approximately 1,147 MTCOe.
2
Table 2
Construction-Related GHG Emissions
Scenario Emissions (MTCOe)
2
10 percent buildout 344
100 percent buildout 34,400
Amortized over 30 years 1,147
Source: NTEC, 2023.
5.2.2 Operations
Table 3 associated with 100
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Greenhouse Gases Study
construction-related GHG emissions that are shown above in Table 2. GHG emissions were
Operation of the Project in 2040 estimated
to result in approximately 12,773.06 MTCOe. However, this is likely a very conservative estimate.
2
For example, CalEEMod contains limited data regarding forecasted carbon emissions factors for
electric utilities such as Southern California Edison, which would provide electricity to uses in the
Specific Plan area. SB 100 requires that 100 percent of electricity provided to retail users in
California come from carbon-free sources by 2045, meaning that by 2040, it reasons that
electricity provided by Southern California Edison would be nearly carbon free. However, for
Southern California Edison, CalEEMod utilizes the same 260.79 lbs/MWh emissions factor for the
years 2040 and 2045, demonstrating that CalEEMod
transition to 100 percent renewable energy under SB 100. By 2040, electricity provided to uses
within the Specific Plan area would likely be nearly carbon free, and the energy-related emissions
shown in Table 3 would be lower than the 1,280 MTCOe figure shown. CalEEMod also does not
2
fully account for the declines in area and energy-related GHG emissions that would occur as the
State transitions away from natural gas appliances, or the declines in mobile emissions that would
result from EO N-79-200, which establishes that 100 percent of in-state sales of new passenger
cars and trucks be zero-emission by 2035. Thus, the annual GHG emissions shown in Table 3
should be interpreted as conservative estimates actual emissions are likely to be substantially
lower.
Table 3
Operations-Related GHG Emissions (Full Buildout 2040)
Source Emissions (MTCOe)
2
Mobile 9,953
Area 12.4
Energy 1,280
Water/Wastewater 129
Solid Waste 251
Refrigerants 0.66
Construction 1,147
Total Emissions 12,773.06
Source: NTEC, 2023.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Appendix
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Project
!
1 /31
2 /31
3 /31
4 /31
Description—
Population—
SpecialLandscapeArea(sqft)—
LandscapeArea(sqft)0.00
ValueDowntownSPUpdate-ConstructionOnly(Summer)7/1/2024—Plan/communityCounty3.5017.633.92134258270639,-118.41595830576219LosAngeles-SouthCoastElSegundoSouthCoastAQMDSouthCoast45347SouthernCaliforniaEd
isonSouthernCaliforniaGas2022.1.1.19
5 /31
BuildingArea(sqft)13,000
LotAcreage0.30
Unit1000sqft
Size13.0
DataFieldProjectNameConstructionStartDateLeadAgencyLandUseScaleAnalysisLevelforDefaultsWindspeed(m/s)Precipitation(days)LocationCountyCityAirDistrictAirBasinTAZEDFZElectricUtilityGasUtilityAppVersion
LandUseSubtypeStripMall
1.BasicProjectInformation
CO2e—13,977—2,556—1,598—265
R—15.4—0.07—0.74—0.12
———
N2O—0.86—0.07—0.07—0.01
CH4—0.60—0.10—0.07—0.01
——89.0
CO2T—13,692—2,533—1,573—260
NBCO2—13,692—2,533—1,573—260
———
BCO2————————
PM2.5T—3.69—0.47—0.36—0.07
0.000.000.00
PM2.5D—1.74—0.12—0.14—0.03
6 /31
PM2.5E—1.95—0.35—0.22—0.04
20,0002,40028,800
PM10T—8.03—0.88—0.75—0.14
PM10D—5.92—0.51—0.51—0.09
0.460.060.79
PM10E—2.11—0.37—0.24—0.04
SO2—0.11—0.02—0.01—<0.005
1000sqft1000sqftDwellingUnit
CO—56.9—12.4—6.99—1.28
NOx—52.6—9.98—6.13—1.12
20.02.4030.0
ROG—27.6—1.29—2.10—0.38
TOG—6.74—1.55—0.86—0.16
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseUn/Mit.Daily,Summer(Max)Unmit.Daily,Winter(Max)Unmit.AverageDaily(Max)Unmit.Annual(Max)Unmit.
Nomeasuresselected 2.EmissionsSummary
CO2e—13,9772,568—2,5562,543—1,598469—26577.7CO2e——
R—15.42.45—0.070.06—0.740.19—0.120.03R——
N2O—0.860.07—0.070.07—0.070.01—0.01<0.005N2O——
CH4—0.600.10—0.100.10—0.070.02—0.01<0.005CH4——
CO2T—13,6922,542—2,5332,519—1,573464—26076.9CO2T——
NBCO2—13,6922,542—2,5332,519—1,573464—26076.9NBCO2——
BCO2————————————BCO2——
PM2.5T—3.690.43—0.470.43—0.360.08—0.070.01PM2.5T——
PM2.5D—1.740.12—0.120.12—0.140.02—0.03<0.005PM2.5D——
7 /31
PM2.5E—1.950.30—0.350.30—0.220.06—0.040.01PM2.5E——
PM10T—8.030.84—0.880.84—0.750.15—0.140.03PM10T——
PM10D—5.920.51—0.510.51—0.510.09—0.090.02PM10D——
PM10E—2.110.33—0.370.33—0.240.06—0.040.01PM10E——
SO2—0.110.02—0.020.02—0.01<0.005—<0.005<0.005SO2——
CO—56.912.5—12.412.1—6.992.25—1.280.41CO——
NOx—52.69.41—9.989.44—6.131.74—1.120.32NOx——
ROG—27.61.22—1.291.21—2.100.22—0.380.04ROG——
TOG—6.741.46—1.551.46—0.860.27—0.160.05TOG——
YearDaily-Summer(Max)20242025Daily-Winter(Max)20242025AverageDaily20242025Annual20242025LocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)
3.ConstructionEmissionsDetails
2,502—0.00——158—0.00—26.1—0.00——1790.004,705
——0.00————0.00———0.00——0.700.0010.4
0.02—0.00——<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.010.000.72
0.10—0.00——0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.010.000.22
2,494—0.00——157—0.00—26.0—0.00——1760.004,475
2,494—0.00——157—0.00—26.0—0.00——1760.004,475
—————————————————
0.620.280.00——0.040.020.00—0.01<0.0050.00——0.040.000.38
—0.280.00———0.020.00——<0.0050.00——0.040.000.33
8 /31
0.62—0.00——0.04—0.00—0.01—0.00——0.000.000.06
0.671.830.00——0.040.120.00—0.010.020.00——0.160.001.25
—1.830.00———0.120.00——0.020.00——0.160.001.19
0.67—0.00——0.04—0.00—0.01—0.00——0.000.000.06
0.02—0.00——<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.03
16.0—0.00——1.01—0.00—0.18—0.00——0.940.001.84
15.6—0.00——0.98—0.00—0.18—0.00——0.060.005.21
1.61—0.00——0.10—0.00—0.02—0.00——0.060.000.08
1.92—0.00——0.12—0.00—0.02—0.00——0.060.000.30
Off-RoadEquipmentDemolitionOnsitetruckDaily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentDemolitionOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentDemolitionOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)WorkerVendorHauling
——10.80.00296—1.800.0049.0CO2e——2,462—0.00—
——0.020.000.28—<0.0050.000.05R————0.00—
——<0.0050.000.05—<0.0050.000.01N2O——0.02—0.00—
——<0.0050.000.01—<0.0050.00<0.005CH4——0.10—0.00—
——10.70.00282—1.770.0046.7CO2T——2,454—0.00—
——10.70.00282—1.770.0046.7NBCO2——2,454—0.00—
—————————BCO2——————
——<0.0050.000.02—<0.0050.00<0.005PM2.5T——0.680.890.00—
——<0.0050.000.02—<0.0050.00<0.005PM2.5D———0.890.00—
9 /31
——0.000.00<0.005—0.000.00<0.005PM2.5E——0.68—0.00—
——0.010.000.08—<0.0050.000.01PM10T——0.741.840.00—
——0.010.000.07—<0.0050.000.01PM10D———1.840.00—
——0.000.00<0.005—0.000.00<0.005PM10E——0.74—0.00—
——0.000.00<0.005—0.000.00<0.005SO2——0.02—0.00—
——0.050.000.11—0.010.000.02CO——15.4—0.00—
——<0.0050.000.35—<0.0050.000.06NOx——15.9—0.00—
——<0.0050.00<0.005—<0.0050.00<0.005ROG——1.65—0.00—
——<0.0050.000.02—<0.0050.00<0.005TOG——1.96—0.00—
Daily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckDaily,Winter(Max)
—155—0.00—25.7—0.00——1430.000.00——8.680.00
———0.00———0.00——0.560.000.00——0.020.00
—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——<0.0050.000.00——<0.0050.00
—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.010.000.00——<0.0050.00
—155—0.00—25.6—0.00——1410.000.00——8.560.00
—155—0.00—25.6—0.00——1410.000.00——8.560.00
—————————————————
—0.040.060.00—0.010.010.00——0.030.000.00——<0.0050.00
——0.060.00——0.010.00——0.030.000.00——<0.0050.00
10 /31
—0.04—0.00—0.01—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.00
—0.050.120.00—0.010.020.00——0.130.000.00——0.010.00
——0.120.00——0.020.00——0.130.000.00——0.010.00
—0.05—0.00—0.01—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.00
—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.00
—0.97—0.00—0.18—0.00——0.750.000.00——0.040.00
—1.00—0.00—0.18—0.00——0.050.000.00——<0.0050.00
—0.10—0.00—0.02—0.00——0.040.000.00——<0.0050.00
—0.12—0.00—0.02—0.00——0.050.000.00——<0.0050.00
AverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingDaily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyWorke
rVendor
0.00—1.440.000.00CO2e——1,8070.00—1,8070.00—6510.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00R———0.00——0.00——0.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00N2O——0.010.00—0.010.00—0.010.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00CH4——0.070.00—0.070.00—0.030.00—
0.00—1.420.000.00CO2T——1,8010.00—1,8010.00—6490.00—
0.00—1.420.000.00NBCO2——1,8010.00—1,8010.00—6490.00—
—————BCO2———————————
0.00—<0.0050.000.00PM2.5T——0.340.00—0.340.00—0.120.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00PM2.5D———0.00——0.00——0.00—
11 /31
0.00—0.000.000.00PM2.5E——0.340.00—0.340.00—0.120.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00PM10T——0.370.00—0.370.00—0.130.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00PM10D———0.00——0.00——0.00—
0.00—0.000.000.00PM10E——0.370.00—0.370.00—0.130.00—
0.00—0.000.000.00SO2——0.020.00—0.020.00—0.010.00—
0.00—0.010.000.00CO——10.10.00—10.10.00—3.640.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00NOx——9.440.00—9.440.00—3.400.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00ROG——1.130.00—1.130.00—0.410.00—
0.00—<0.0050.000.00TOG——1.360.00—1.360.00—0.490.00—
HaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckDaily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAnnual
1080.00——4723040.00—4463030.00—1631090.00—27.018.10.00CO2e
—0.00——1.830.790.00—0.050.020.00—0.280.120.00—0.050.020.00R
<0.0050.00——0.020.040.00—0.020.040.00—0.010.010.00—<0.005<0.0050.00N2O
<0.0050.00——0.020.010.00—0.020.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00—<0.005<0.0050.00CH4
1070.00——4652910.00—4412910.00—1611050.00—26.717.30.00CO2T
1070.00——4652910.00—4412910.00—1611050.00—26.717.30.00NBCO2
———————————————————BCO2
0.020.00——0.100.030.00—0.100.030.00—0.040.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00PM2.5T
—0.00——0.100.020.00—0.100.020.00—0.040.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00PM2.5D
12 /31
0.020.00——0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00PM2.5E
0.020.00——0.430.080.00—0.430.080.00—0.150.030.00—0.030.010.00PM10T
—0.00——0.430.080.00—0.430.080.00—0.150.030.00—0.030.010.00PM10D
0.020.00——0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00PM10E
<0.0050.00——0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00SO2
0.660.00——2.480.170.00—2.100.170.00—0.800.060.00—0.150.010.00CO
0.620.00——0.160.340.00—0.190.360.00—0.070.130.00—0.010.020.00NOx
0.070.00——0.150.010.00—0.150.010.00—0.05<0.0050.00—0.01<0.0050.00ROG
0.090.00——0.160.020.00—0.160.020.00—0.060.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00TOG
Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingDaily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocation
——1,8070.00—1,8070.00—3320.00—55.00.00——4622990.00
———0.00——0.00——0.00——0.00——1.670.780.00
——0.010.00—0.010.00—<0.0050.00—<0.0050.00——0.020.040.00
——0.070.00—0.070.00—0.010.00—<0.0050.00——0.020.010.00
——1,8010.00—1,8010.00—3310.00—54.90.00——4552860.00
——1,8010.00—1,8010.00—3310.00—54.90.00——4552860.00
——————————————————
——0.300.00—0.300.00—0.060.00—0.010.00——0.100.020.00
———0.00——0.00——0.00——0.00——0.100.020.00
13 /31
——0.300.00—0.300.00—0.060.00—0.010.00——0.00<0.0050.00
——0.330.00—0.330.00—0.060.00—0.010.00——0.430.080.00
———0.00——0.00——0.00——0.00——0.430.080.00
——0.330.00—0.330.00—0.060.00—0.010.00——0.00<0.0050.00
——0.020.00—0.020.00—<0.0050.00—<0.0050.00——0.00<0.0050.00
——10.00.00—10.00.00—1.850.00—0.340.00——2.290.160.00
——8.950.00—8.950.00—1.650.00—0.300.00——0.140.320.00
——1.070.00—1.070.00—0.200.00—0.040.00——0.140.010.00
——1.280.00—1.280.00—0.240.00—0.040.00——0.160.020.00
OnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckDaily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Worke
rVendorHauling
—4372980.00—81.654.90.00—13.59.090.00CO2e——995—0.00
—0.040.020.00—0.130.060.00—0.020.010.00R————0.00
—0.020.040.00—<0.0050.010.00—<0.005<0.0050.00N2O——0.01—0.00
—0.020.010.00—<0.005<0.0050.00—<0.005<0.0050.00CH4——0.04—0.00
—4322860.00—80.652.60.00—13.38.710.00CO2T——992—0.00
—4322860.00—80.652.60.00—13.38.710.00NBCO2——992—0.00
————————————BCO2—————
—0.100.020.00—0.02<0.0050.00—<0.005<0.0050.00PM2.5T——0.21—0.00
—0.100.020.00—0.02<0.0050.00—<0.005<0.0050.00PM2.5D————0.00
14 /31
—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00PM2.5E——0.21—0.00
—0.430.080.00—0.080.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00PM10T——0.23—0.00
—0.430.080.00—0.080.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00PM10D————0.00
—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00PM10E——0.23—0.00
—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00SO2——0.01—0.00
—1.940.160.00—0.380.030.00—0.070.010.00CO——6.53—0.00
—0.160.340.00—0.030.060.00—0.010.010.00NOx——4.90—0.00
—0.140.010.00—0.03<0.0050.00—<0.005<0.0050.00ROG——0.530.000.00
—0.160.020.00—0.03<0.0050.00—0.01<0.0050.00TOG——0.63—0.00
Daily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentPavingOnsitetruck
——27.3—0.00—4.51—0.00——1790.000.00——4.710.000.00—
————0.00———0.00——0.700.000.00——0.010.000.00—
——<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.010.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
——<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.010.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
——27.2—0.00—4.50—0.00——1760.000.00——4.650.000.00—
——27.2—0.00—4.50—0.00——1760.000.00——4.650.000.00—
————————————————————
——0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.040.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
————0.00———0.00——0.040.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
15 /31
——0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.000.00—
——0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.160.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
————0.00———0.00——0.160.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
——0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.000.00—
——<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.000.00—
——0.18—0.00—0.03—0.00——0.940.000.00——0.020.000.00—
——0.13—0.00—0.02—0.00——0.060.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
——0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00——0.060.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
——0.02—0.00—<0.005—0.00——0.060.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—
Daily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentPavingOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentPavingOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingDaily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnua
l
0.780.000.00CO2e——134—0.00——8.44—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00R————0.00————0.00—
<0.0050.000.00N2O——<0.005—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00CH4——0.01—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
0.770.000.00CO2T——134—0.00——8.41—0.00—
0.770.000.00NBCO2——134—0.00——8.41—0.00—
———BCO2———————————
<0.0050.000.00PM2.5T——0.03—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00PM2.5D————0.00————0.00—
16 /31
0.000.000.00PM2.5E——0.03—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00PM10T——0.03—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00PM10D————0.00————0.00—
0.000.000.00PM10E——0.03—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
0.000.000.00SO2——<0.005—0.00——<0.005—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00CO——1.15—0.00——0.07—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00NOx——0.91—0.00——0.06—0.00—
<0.0050.000.00ROG——0.1422.10.00——0.011.390.00—
<0.0050.000.00TOG——0.17—0.00——0.01—0.00—
WorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckDaily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckAnnual
1.40—0.00——94.40.000.00——5.710.000.00—0.950.000.00
——0.00——0.370.000.00——0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
<0.005—0.00——<0.0050.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
<0.005—0.00——<0.0050.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
1.39—0.00——93.00.000.00——5.640.000.00—0.930.000.00
1.39—0.00——93.00.000.00——5.640.000.00—0.930.000.00
—————————————————
<0.005—0.00——0.020.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
——0.00——0.020.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
17 /31
<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
<0.005—0.00——0.090.000.00——0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
——0.00——0.090.000.00——0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
<0.005—0.00——0.000.000.00——0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.01—0.00——0.500.000.00——0.030.000.00—0.010.000.00
0.01—0.00——0.030.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
<0.0050.250.00——0.030.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
<0.005—0.00——0.030.000.00——<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
Off-RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingDaily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHauling
4.OperationsEmissionsDetails
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
18 /31
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
VegetationDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e———————————————————
R———————————————————
N2O———————————————————
CH4———————————————————
CO2T———————————————————
NBCO2———————————————————
BCO2———————————————————
PM2.5T———————————————————
PM2.5D———————————————————
19 /31
PM2.5E———————————————————
PM10T———————————————————
PM10D———————————————————
PM10E———————————————————
SO2———————————————————
CO———————————————————
NOx———————————————————
ROG———————————————————
TOG———————————————————
SpeciesDaily,Summer(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—Daily,Winter(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—AnnualAvoidedSubtotal
—————
—————
LoadFactor0.370.400.730.41
PhaseDescription—————
—————
—————
Horsepower84.036733.0148
—————
WorkDaysperPhase23.023.020010.023.0
—————
—————
HoursPerDay8.008.008.008.00
—————
DaysPerWeek5.005.005.005.005.00
—————
NumberperDay3.001.001.001.00
20 /31
—————
EndDate7/31/20247/31/20244/4/20257/12/20247/31/2024
—————
EngineTierAverageAverageAverageAverage
—————
—————
StartDate7/1/20247/1/20247/1/20247/1/20247/1/2024
—————
FuelTypeDieselDieselDieselDiesel
—————
—————
PhaseTypeDemolitionGradingBuildingConstructionPavingArchitecturalCoating
EquipmentTypeTractors/Loaders/BackhoesRubberTiredDozersConcrete/IndustrialSawsGraders
—————
—————
SequestSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—PhaseNameDemolitionGradingBuildingConstructionPavingArchitecturalCoatingPhaseNameDemolitionDemolitionDemolitionGrading
5.ActivityData
0.370.400.290.200.740.370.450.370.420.360.380.560.48
VehicleMix—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2
84.036736782.014.084.046.084.081.089.036.010.037.0
7.008.006.006.008.006.008.008.006.008.007.006.006.00
MilesperTrip—18.510.240.0——18.5
2.001.001.001.001.001.003.001.001.001.001.001.001.00
21 /31
One-WayTripsperDay—12.5—32.1——10.0
AverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverage
DieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDiesel
TripType—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck—Worker
Tractors/Loaders/BackhoesRubberTiredDozersCranesForkliftsGeneratorSetsTractors/Loaders/BackhoesWeldersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesPaversPavingEquipmentRollersCementandMortarMixersAirCompressors
GradingGradingBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionPavingPavingPavingPavingPavingArchitecturalCoatingPhaseNameDemolitionDemolitionDemoli
tionDemolitionDemolitionGradingGrading
HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT
PM2.5Reduction55%44%9%
10.220.0——18.510.220.0——18.510.220.0——18.510.220.0—
22 /31
—0.00——32.99.010.00——12.5—0.00——6.59—0.00—
PM10Reduction55%44%9%
VendorHaulingOnsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck
GradingGradingGradingBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionPavingPavingPavingPavingPavingArchitecturalCoatingArchitecturalCoatingArchitec
turalCoatingArchitecturalCoatingArchitecturalCoatingControlStrategiesAppliedWaterunpavedroadstwicedailyLimitvehiclespeedsonunpavedroadsto25mphSweeppavedroadsoncepermonth
ParkingAreaCoated(sqft)—AcresPaved(acres)——0.00
PM2.5Reduction74%36%
Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)17,700MaterialDemolished(BuildingSquareFootage)64,2000.000.00%Asphalt0%0%0%0%
Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)53,100AcresGraded(acres)0.0023.00.00PM10Reduction74%36%
23 /31
ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)19,440MaterialExported(cy)0.00—0.00AreaPaved(acres)0.000.000.00—
Frequency(perday)32
ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)58,320MaterialImported(cy)0.00—0.00
PhaseNameArchitecturalCoatingPhaseNameDemolitionGradingPavingControlStrategiesAppliedWaterExposedAreaWaterDemolishedAreaLandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRise
N2O<0.005<0.005
FinalAcresNaturalGasSaved(btu/year)
FinalAcres
CH40.030.03
InitialAcresElectricitySaved(kWh/year)
24 /31
CO2532532
InitialAcres
VegetationSoilTypeNumber
kWhperYear0.000.00
Year20242025VegetationLandUseTypeBiomassCoverTypeTreeType
6.ClimateRiskDetailedReport
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Unitannualdaysofextremeheatannualdayswithprecipitationabove20mmmetersofinundationdepthannualhectaresburned
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
25 /31
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectLocation0.000.000.000.00
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityD
egradation
Cal-Adaptmidcentury2040–2059averageprojectionsforfourhazardsarereportedbelowforyourprojectlocation.TheseareunderRepresentationConcentrationPathway(RCP)8.5whichassumesGHGemissionswillcontinuetorisestr
onglythrough2050andthenplateauaround2100.TemperatureandExtremeHeatdataareforgridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Theprojectionisbasedonthe98thhistoricalpercentileofdailymaximum/minimumtemperaturesfro
mobservedhistoricaldata(32climatemodelensemblefromCal-Adapt,2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5). Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.ExtremePrecipitationdataareforthegridcellinwhichyour
projectarelocated.Thethresholdof20mmisequivalenttoabout¾aninchofrain,whichwouldbelighttomoderaterainfallifreceivedoverafulldayorheavyrainifreceivedoveraperiodof2to4hours.Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)
by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.SeaLevelRisedataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromRadkeetal.(2017),asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderdifferent
incrementsofsealevelrisecoupledwithextremestormevents.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialinundationdepthforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpec
tedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis50meters(m)by50m,ora
bout164feet(ft)by164ft.Wildfiredataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromUCDavis,asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderhistoricaldataofclimate,veg
etation,populationdensity,andlarge(>400ha)firehistory.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialwildfireprobabilitiesforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsabou
texpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km
)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestex
posure.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectCensusTract—32.172.095.6
26 /31
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradationIndicatorExposureIndicatorsAQ-OzoneAQ-PMAQ-DPM
Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectreferstoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.The
overallvulnerabilityscoresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresdonotincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.Thesensitivityscorereflects
theextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectreferstoitsabilityto
manageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalculatedbasedonthe
potentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.7.HealthandEquityDetails ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,grea
terthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
8.9548.90.0089.962.7—58.669.298.758.739.0—12.822.019.6—6.5233.24.5923.758.4ResultforProjectCensusTract—82.8564096
27 /31
DrinkingWaterLeadRiskHousingPesticidesToxicReleasesTrafficEffectIndicatorsCleanUpSitesGroundwaterHazWasteFacilities/GeneratorsImpairedWaterBodiesSolidWasteSensitivePopulationAsthmaCardio-vascularLowB
irthWeightsSocioeconomicFactorIndicatorsEducationHousingLinguisticPovertyUnemploymentIndicatorEconomicAbovePoverty
ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
92.634415571.46156807—79.8280508110035.76286411—74.5797510669.25445913—91.0817400257.05119979—23.3286282681.3550622445.617862182.3995893754.632362376—17.6825356176.697035878.7373283795.3933016859.348
13294—73.784165280.0
28 /31
EmployedMedianHIEducationBachelor'sorhigherHighschoolenrollmentPreschoolenrollmentTransportationAutoAccessActivecommutingSocial2-parenthouseholdsVotingNeighborhoodAlcoholavailabilityParkaccessRetaild
ensitySupermarketaccessTreecanopyHousingHomeownershipHousinghabitabilityLow-inchomeownerseverehousingcostburdenLow-increnterseverehousingcostburdenUncrowdedhousingHealthOutcomesInsuredadultsArthritis
84.50.00.00.00.00.00.068.887.280.265.40.00.00.019.60.00.0—0.00.00.0—0.00.031.069.378.4
29 /31
AsthmaERAdmissionsHighBloodPressureCancer(excludingskin)AsthmaCoronaryHeartDiseaseChronicObstructivePulmonaryDiseaseDiagnosedDiabetesLifeExpectancyatBirthCognitivelyDisabledPhysically
DisabledHeartAttackERAdmissionsMentalHealthNotGoodChronicKidneyDiseaseObesityPedestrianInjuriesPhysicalHealthNotGoodStrokeHealthRiskBehaviorsBingeDrinkingCurrentSmokerNoLeisureTimeforPhysicalActivit
yClimateChangeExposuresWildfireRiskSLRInundationAreaChildrenElderlyEnglishSpeaking
14.477.2—19.243.523.0—11.3—48.5ResultforProjectCensusTract26.079.0NoNoNo
30 /31
Foreign-bornOutdoorWorkersClimateChangeAdaptiveCapacityImperviousSurfaceCoverTrafficDensityTrafficAccessOtherIndicesHardshipOtherDecisionSupport2016VotingMetricCalEnviroScreen4.0ScoreforProjectLocati
on(a)HealthyPlacesIndexScoreforProjectLocation(b)ProjectLocatedinaDesignatedDisadvantagedCommunity(SenateBill535)ProjectLocatedinaLow-IncomeCommunity(AssemblyBill1550)ProjectLocatedinaCommunityAirPro
tectionProgramCommunity(AssemblyBill617)
a:ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.b:ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greater
than50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.NoHealth&EquityMeasuresselected.Health&EquityEvaluationScorecardnotcompleted.NoHealth&EquityCustomMeasurescreated.
JustificationSeeNoteA.1SeeNoteA.2
31 /31
ScreenConstruction:ConstructionPhasesConstruction:TripsandVMT
8.UserChangestoDefaultData
1 /29
2 /29
3 /29
4 /29
Description—
Population—
SpecialLandscapeArea(sqft)—
LandscapeArea(sqft)0.00
ValueDowntownSPUpdate-ConstructionOnly(Winter)1/1/2024—Plan/communityCounty3.5017.633.92134258270639,-118.41595830576219LosAngeles-SouthCoastElSegundoSouthCoastAQMDSouthCoast45347SouthernCaliforniaEd
isonSouthernCaliforniaGas2022.1.1.19
5 /29
BuildingArea(sqft)13,000
LotAcreage0.30
Unit1000sqft
Size13.0
DataFieldProjectNameConstructionStartDateLeadAgencyLandUseScaleAnalysisLevelforDefaultsWindspeed(m/s)Precipitation(days)LocationCountyCityAirDistrictAirBasinTAZEDFZElectricUtilityGasUtilityAppVersion
LandUseSubtypeStripMall
1.BasicProjectInformation
CO2e—2,583—13,909—2,079—344
R—2.62—0.40—0.95—0.16
———
N2O—0.07—0.86—0.09—0.01
CH4—0.10—0.60—0.09—0.01
——89.0
CO2T—2,557—13,638—2,050—339
NBCO2—2,557—13,638—2,050—339
———
BCO2————————
PM2.5T—0.47—3.69—0.45—0.08
0.000.000.00
PM2.5D—0.12—1.74—0.17—0.03
6 /29
PM2.5E—0.35—1.95—0.28—0.05
20,0002,40028,800
PM10T—0.88—8.03—0.92—0.17
PM10D—0.51—5.92—0.61—0.11
0.460.060.79
PM10E—0.37—2.11—0.31—0.06
SO2—0.02—0.11—0.02—<0.005
1000sqft1000sqftDwellingUnit
CO—12.8—56.0—9.33—1.70
NOx—9.94—52.9—8.00—1.46
20.02.4030.0
ROG—1.29—27.6—2.34—0.43
TOG—1.55—6.73—1.15—0.21
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseUn/Mit.Daily,Summer(Max)Unmit.Daily,Winter(Max)Unmit.AverageDaily(Max)Unmit.Annual(Max)Unmit.
Nomeasuresselected 2.EmissionsSummary
CO2e—2,583—13,909—2,079—344CO2e———2,502
R—2.62—0.40—0.95—0.16R————
N2O—0.07—0.86—0.09—0.01N2O———0.02
CH4—0.10—0.60—0.09—0.01CH4———0.10
CO2T—2,557—13,638—2,050—339CO2T———2,494
NBCO2—2,557—13,638—2,050—339NBCO2———2,494
BCO2————————BCO2————
PM2.5T—0.47—3.69—0.45—0.08PM2.5T———0.62
PM2.5D—0.12—1.74—0.17—0.03PM2.5D————
7 /29
PM2.5E—0.35—1.95—0.28—0.05PM2.5E———0.62
PM10T—0.88—8.03—0.92—0.17PM10T———0.67
PM10D—0.51—5.92—0.61—0.11PM10D————
PM10E—0.37—2.11—0.31—0.06PM10E———0.67
SO2—0.02—0.11—0.02—<0.005SO2———0.02
CO—12.8—56.0—9.33—1.70CO———16.0
NOx—9.94—52.9—8.00—1.46NOx———15.6
ROG—1.29—27.6—2.34—0.43ROG———1.61
TOG—1.55—6.73—1.15—0.21TOG———1.92
YearDaily-Summer(Max)2024Daily-Winter(Max)2024AverageDaily2024Annual2024LocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipment
3.ConstructionEmissionsDetails
—0.00—158—0.00—26.1—0.00———1690.004,696—10.80.00
—0.00———0.00———0.00———0.020.000.27—0.020.00
—0.00—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.010.000.72—<0.0050.00
—0.00—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.010.000.22—<0.0050.00
—0.00—157—0.00—26.0—0.00———1670.004,476—10.70.00
—0.00—157—0.00—26.0—0.00———1670.004,476—10.70.00
———————————————————
0.280.00—0.040.020.00—0.01<0.0050.00———0.040.000.38—<0.0050.00
0.280.00——0.020.00——<0.0050.00———0.040.000.33—<0.0050.00
8 /29
—0.00—0.04—0.00—0.01—0.00———0.000.000.06—0.000.00
1.830.00—0.040.120.00—0.010.020.00———0.160.001.25—0.010.00
1.830.00——0.120.00——0.020.00———0.160.001.19—0.010.00
—0.00—0.04—0.00—0.01—0.00———0.000.000.06—0.000.00
—0.00—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.03—0.000.00
—0.00—1.01—0.00—0.18—0.00———0.800.001.82—0.050.00
—0.00—0.98—0.00—0.18—0.00———0.070.005.41—<0.0050.00
—0.00—0.10—0.00—0.02—0.00———0.060.000.08—<0.0050.00
—0.00—0.12—0.00—0.02—0.00———0.060.000.30—<0.0050.00
DemolitionOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentDemolitionOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentDemolitionOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAverageDailyWorkerVendor
296—1.800.0049.0CO2e———2,462—0.00—155—
0.28—<0.0050.000.05R—————0.00———
0.05—<0.0050.000.01N2O———0.02—0.00—<0.005—
0.01—<0.0050.00<0.005CH4———0.10—0.00—0.01—
282—1.770.0046.7CO2T———2,454—0.00—155—
282—1.770.0046.7NBCO2———2,454—0.00—155—
—————BCO2—————————
0.02—<0.0050.00<0.005PM2.5T———0.680.890.00—0.040.06
0.02—<0.0050.00<0.005PM2.5D————0.890.00——0.06
9 /29
<0.005—0.000.00<0.005PM2.5E———0.68—0.00—0.04—
0.08—<0.0050.000.01PM10T———0.741.840.00—0.050.12
0.07—<0.0050.000.01PM10D————1.840.00——0.12
<0.005—0.000.00<0.005PM10E———0.74—0.00—0.05—
<0.005—0.000.00<0.005SO2———0.02—0.00—<0.005—
0.11—0.010.000.02CO———15.4—0.00—0.97—
0.35—<0.0050.000.06NOx———15.9—0.00—1.00—
<0.005—<0.0050.00<0.005ROG———1.65—0.00—0.10—
0.02—<0.0050.00<0.005TOG———1.96—0.00—0.12—
HaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovement
0.00—25.7—0.00———1350.000.00—8.680.000.00—1.440.000.00
0.00———0.00———0.010.000.00—0.020.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—25.6—0.00———1340.000.00—8.560.000.00—1.420.000.00
0.00—25.6—0.00———1340.000.00—8.560.000.00—1.420.000.00
———————————————————
0.00—0.010.010.00———0.030.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00——0.010.00———0.030.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
10 /29
0.00—0.01—0.00———0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.00—0.010.020.00———0.130.000.00—0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00——0.020.00———0.130.000.00—0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—0.01—0.00———0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.00—0.18—0.00———0.640.000.00—0.040.000.00—0.010.000.00
0.00—0.18—0.00———0.060.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—0.02—0.00———0.040.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—0.02—0.00———0.050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
OnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHauling
CO2e——1,8070.00—1,8070.00—9900.00—1640.00—
R———0.00——0.00——0.00——0.00—
N2O——0.010.00—0.010.00—0.010.00—<0.0050.00—
CH4——0.070.00—0.070.00—0.040.00—0.010.00—
CO2T——1,8010.00—1,8010.00—9870.00—1630.00—
NBCO2——1,8010.00—1,8010.00—9870.00—1630.00—
BCO2——————————————
PM2.5T——0.340.00—0.340.00—0.190.00—0.030.00—
PM2.5D———0.00——0.00——0.00——0.00—
11 /29
PM2.5E——0.340.00—0.340.00—0.190.00—0.030.00—
PM10T——0.370.00—0.370.00—0.200.00—0.040.00—
PM10D———0.00——0.00——0.00——0.00—
PM10E——0.370.00—0.370.00—0.200.00—0.040.00—
SO2——0.020.00—0.020.00—0.010.00—<0.0050.00—
CO——10.10.00—10.10.00—5.540.00—1.010.00—
NOx——9.440.00—9.440.00—5.170.00—0.940.00—
ROG——1.130.00—1.130.00—0.620.00—0.110.00—
TOG——1.360.00—1.360.00—0.750.00—0.140.00—
LocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckDaily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckOffsite
—4723040.00—4463030.00—2481660.00—41.127.50.00CO2e——
—1.830.790.00—0.050.020.00—0.430.190.00—0.070.030.00R——
—0.020.040.00—0.020.040.00—0.010.020.00—<0.005<0.0050.00N2O——
—0.020.010.00—0.020.010.00—0.010.010.00—<0.005<0.0050.00CH4——
—4652910.00—4412910.00—2451590.00—40.626.40.00CO2T——
—4652910.00—4412910.00—2451590.00—40.626.40.00NBCO2——
————————————————BCO2——
—0.100.030.00—0.100.030.00—0.050.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00PM2.5T——
—0.100.020.00—0.100.020.00—0.050.010.00—0.01<0.0050.00PM2.5D——
12 /29
—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00PM2.5E——
—0.430.080.00—0.430.080.00—0.230.040.00—0.040.010.00PM10T——
—0.430.080.00—0.430.080.00—0.230.040.00—0.040.010.00PM10D——
—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00PM10E——
—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00—0.00<0.0050.00SO2——
—2.480.170.00—2.100.170.00—1.210.090.00—0.220.020.00CO——
—0.160.340.00—0.190.360.00—0.100.200.00—0.020.040.00NOx——
—0.150.010.00—0.150.010.00—0.08<0.0050.00—0.01<0.0050.00ROG——
—0.160.020.00—0.160.020.00—0.090.010.00—0.02<0.0050.00TOG——
Daily,Summer(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingDaily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)
—995—0.00—27.3—0.00—4.51—0.00———1690.000.00—
———0.00———0.00———0.00———0.020.000.00—
—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.010.000.00—
—0.04—0.00—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.010.000.00—
—992—0.00—27.2—0.00—4.50—0.00———1670.000.00—
—992—0.00—27.2—0.00—4.50—0.00———1670.000.00—
———————————————————
—0.21—0.00—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.040.000.00—
———0.00———0.00———0.00———0.040.000.00—
13 /29
—0.21—0.00—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—
—0.23—0.00—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.160.000.00—
———0.00———0.00———0.00———0.160.000.00—
—0.23—0.00—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—
—0.01—0.00—<0.005—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—
—6.53—0.00—0.18—0.00—0.03—0.00———0.800.000.00—
—4.90—0.00—0.13—0.00—0.02—0.00———0.070.000.00—
—0.530.000.00—0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00———0.060.000.00—
—0.63—0.00—0.02—0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.060.000.00—
Daily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentPavingOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentPavingOnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentPavingOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAv
erageDaily
4.710.000.00—0.780.000.00CO2e———134—0.00—8.44—
0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00R—————0.00———
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00N2O———<0.005—0.00—<0.005—
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00CH4———0.01—0.00—<0.005—
4.650.000.00—0.770.000.00CO2T———134—0.00—8.41—
4.650.000.00—0.770.000.00NBCO2———134—0.00—8.41—
———————BCO2—————————
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00PM2.5T———0.03—0.00—<0.005—
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00PM2.5D—————0.00———
14 /29
0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00PM2.5E———0.03—0.00—<0.005—
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00PM10T———0.03—0.00—<0.005—
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00PM10D—————0.00———
0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00PM10E———0.03—0.00—<0.005—
0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00SO2———<0.005—0.00—<0.005—
0.020.000.00—<0.0050.000.00CO———1.15—0.00—0.07—
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00NOx———0.91—0.00—0.06—
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00ROG———0.1422.10.00—0.011.39
<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00TOG———0.17—0.00—0.01—
WorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHaulingLocationOnsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatings
0.00—1.40—0.00———89.20.000.00—5.710.000.00—0.950.000.00
0.00———0.00———0.010.000.00—0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—1.39—0.00———88.10.000.00—5.640.000.00—0.930.000.00
0.00—1.39—0.00———88.10.000.00—5.640.000.00—0.930.000.00
———————————————————
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.020.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00———0.00———0.020.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
15 /29
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.090.000.00—0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00———0.00———0.090.000.00—0.010.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00—0.000.000.00
0.00—0.01—0.00———0.420.000.00—0.030.000.00—0.010.000.00
0.00—0.01—0.00———0.040.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.0050.250.00———0.030.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
0.00—<0.005—0.00———0.030.000.00—<0.0050.000.00—<0.0050.000.00
OnsitetruckAnnualOff-RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)WorkerVendorHaulingAverageDailyWorkerVendorHaulingAnnualWorkerVendorHauling
CO2e——————CO2e————
R——————R————
N2O——————N2O————
CH4——————CH4————
CO2T——————CO2T————
NBCO2——————NBCO2————
BCO2——————BCO2————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D————
16 /29
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E————
PM10T——————PM10T————
PM10D——————PM10D————
PM10E——————PM10E————
SO2——————SO2————
CO——————CO————
NOx——————NOx————
ROG——————ROG————
TOG——————TOG————
VegetationDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)Total
4.OperationsEmissionsDetails
——CO2e————————————————
——R————————————————
——N2O————————————————
——CH4————————————————
——CO2T————————————————
——NBCO2————————————————
——BCO2————————————————
——PM2.5T————————————————
——PM2.5D————————————————
17 /29
——PM2.5E————————————————
——PM10T————————————————
——PM10D————————————————
——PM10E————————————————
——SO2————————————————
——CO————————————————
——NOx————————————————
——ROG————————————————
——TOG————————————————
AnnualTotalSpeciesDaily,Summer(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—Daily,Winter(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—
————————
————————
LoadFactor0.370.40
PhaseDescription—————
————————
————————
Horsepower84.0367
————————
WorkDaysperPhase23.023.020010.023.0
————————
————————
HoursPerDay8.008.00
————————
DaysPerWeek5.005.005.005.005.00
————————
NumberperDay3.001.00
18 /29
————————
EndDate1/31/20241/31/202410/4/20241/12/20241/31/2024
————————
EngineTierAverageAverage
————————
————————
StartDate1/1/20241/1/20241/1/20241/1/20241/1/2024
————————
FuelTypeDieselDiesel
————————
————————
PhaseTypeDemolitionGradingBuildingConstructionPavingArchitecturalCoating
EquipmentTypeTractors/Loaders/BackhoesRubberTiredDozers
————————
————————
AnnualAvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—PhaseNameDemolitionGradingBuildingConstructionPavingArchitecturalCoatingPhaseNameDemolitionDemolition
5.ActivityData
0.730.410.370.400.290.200.740.370.450.370.420.360.380.560.48
VehicleMix—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDT
33.014884.036736782.014.084.046.084.081.089.036.010.037.0
8.008.007.008.006.006.008.006.008.008.006.008.007.006.006.00
MilesperTrip—18.510.240.0
1.001.002.001.001.001.001.001.003.001.001.001.001.001.001.00
19 /29
One-WayTripsperDay—12.5—32.1
AverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverageAverage
DieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDieselDiesel
TripType—WorkerVendorHauling
Concrete/IndustrialSawsGradersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesRubberTiredDozersCranesForkliftsGeneratorSetsTractors/Loaders/BackhoesWeldersTractors/Loaders/BackhoesPaversPavingEquipmentRollersCementandMorta
rMixersAirCompressors
DemolitionGradingGradingGradingBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionPavingPavingPavingPavingPavingArchitecturalCoatingPhaseNameDemolitio
nDemolitionDemolitionDemolition
HHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT—LDA,LDT1,LDT2HHDT,MHDTHHDTHHDT
PM2.5Reduction55%
——18.510.220.0——18.510.220.0——18.510.220.0——18.510.220.0—
20 /29
——10.0—0.00——32.99.010.00——12.5—0.00——6.59—0.00—
PM10Reduction55%
Onsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck—WorkerVendorHaulingOnsitetruck
DemolitionGradingGradingGradingGradingGradingBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionPavingPavingPavingPavingPavingArchitecturalCoatingArch
itecturalCoatingArchitecturalCoatingArchitecturalCoatingArchitecturalCoatingControlStrategiesAppliedWaterunpavedroadstwicedaily
ParkingAreaCoated(sqft)—AcresPaved(acres)——0.00
PM2.5Reduction74%36%
44%9%Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)17,700MaterialDemolished(BuildingSquareFootage)64,2000.000.00%Asphalt0%0%0%
Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)53,100AcresGraded(acres)0.0023.00.00PM10Reduction74%36%
21 /29
44%9%ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)19,440MaterialExported(cy)0.00—0.00AreaPaved(acres)0.000.000.00
Frequency(perday)32
ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)58,320MaterialImported(cy)0.00—0.00
Limitvehiclespeedsonunpavedroadsto25mphSweeppavedroadsoncepermonthPhaseNameArchitecturalCoatingPhaseNameDemolitionGradingPavingControlStrategiesAppliedWaterExposedAreaWaterDemolishedAreaLandUseStripM
allGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuilding
N2O<0.005
FinalAcresNaturalGasSaved(btu/year)
0%FinalAcres
CH40.03
InitialAcresElectricitySaved(kWh/year)
22 /29
CO2532
—InitialAcres
VegetationSoilTypeNumber
kWhperYear0.00
ApartmentsMidRiseYear2024VegetationLandUseTypeBiomassCoverTypeTreeType
6.ClimateRiskDetailedReport
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Unitannualdaysofextremeheatannualdayswithprecipitationabove20mmmetersofinundationdepthannualhectaresburned
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
23 /29
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectLocation0.000.000.000.00
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityD
egradation
Cal-Adaptmidcentury2040–2059averageprojectionsforfourhazardsarereportedbelowforyourprojectlocation.TheseareunderRepresentationConcentrationPathway(RCP)8.5whichassumesGHGemissionswillcontinuetorisestr
onglythrough2050andthenplateauaround2100.TemperatureandExtremeHeatdataareforgridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Theprojectionisbasedonthe98thhistoricalpercentileofdailymaximum/minimumtemperaturesfro
mobservedhistoricaldata(32climatemodelensemblefromCal-Adapt,2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5). Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.ExtremePrecipitationdataareforthegridcellinwhichyour
projectarelocated.Thethresholdof20mmisequivalenttoabout¾aninchofrain,whichwouldbelighttomoderaterainfallifreceivedoverafulldayorheavyrainifreceivedoveraperiodof2to4hours.Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)
by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.SeaLevelRisedataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromRadkeetal.(2017),asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderdifferent
incrementsofsealevelrisecoupledwithextremestormevents.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialinundationdepthforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpec
tedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis50meters(m)by50m,ora
bout164feet(ft)by164ft.Wildfiredataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromUCDavis,asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderhistoricaldataofclimate,veg
etation,populationdensity,andlarge(>400ha)firehistory.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialwildfireprobabilitiesforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsabou
texpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km
)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestex
posure.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectCensusTract—32.172.095.6
24 /29
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradationIndicatorExposureIndicatorsAQ-OzoneAQ-PMAQ-DPM
Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectreferstoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.The
overallvulnerabilityscoresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresdonotincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.Thesensitivityscorereflects
theextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectreferstoitsabilityto
manageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalculatedbasedonthe
potentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.7.HealthandEquityDetails ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,grea
terthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
8.9548.90.0089.962.7—58.669.298.758.739.0—12.822.019.6—6.5233.24.5923.758.4ResultforProjectCensusTract—82.8564096
25 /29
DrinkingWaterLeadRiskHousingPesticidesToxicReleasesTrafficEffectIndicatorsCleanUpSitesGroundwaterHazWasteFacilities/GeneratorsImpairedWaterBodiesSolidWasteSensitivePopulationAsthmaCardio-vascularLowB
irthWeightsSocioeconomicFactorIndicatorsEducationHousingLinguisticPovertyUnemploymentIndicatorEconomicAbovePoverty
ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
92.634415571.46156807—79.8280508110035.76286411—74.5797510669.25445913—91.0817400257.05119979—23.3286282681.3550622445.617862182.3995893754.632362376—17.6825356176.697035878.7373283795.3933016859.348
13294—73.784165280.0
26 /29
EmployedMedianHIEducationBachelor'sorhigherHighschoolenrollmentPreschoolenrollmentTransportationAutoAccessActivecommutingSocial2-parenthouseholdsVotingNeighborhoodAlcoholavailabilityParkaccessRetaild
ensitySupermarketaccessTreecanopyHousingHomeownershipHousinghabitabilityLow-inchomeownerseverehousingcostburdenLow-increnterseverehousingcostburdenUncrowdedhousingHealthOutcomesInsuredadultsArthritis
84.50.00.00.00.00.00.068.887.280.265.40.00.00.019.60.00.0—0.00.00.0—0.00.031.069.378.4
27 /29
AsthmaERAdmissionsHighBloodPressureCancer(excludingskin)AsthmaCoronaryHeartDiseaseChronicObstructivePulmonaryDiseaseDiagnosedDiabetesLifeExpectancyatBirthCognitivelyDisabledPhysically
DisabledHeartAttackERAdmissionsMentalHealthNotGoodChronicKidneyDiseaseObesityPedestrianInjuriesPhysicalHealthNotGoodStrokeHealthRiskBehaviorsBingeDrinkingCurrentSmokerNoLeisureTimeforPhysicalActivit
yClimateChangeExposuresWildfireRiskSLRInundationAreaChildrenElderlyEnglishSpeaking
14.477.2—19.243.523.0—11.3—48.5ResultforProjectCensusTract26.079.0NoNoNo
28 /29
Foreign-bornOutdoorWorkersClimateChangeAdaptiveCapacityImperviousSurfaceCoverTrafficDensityTrafficAccessOtherIndicesHardshipOtherDecisionSupport2016VotingMetricCalEnviroScreen4.0ScoreforProjectLocati
on(a)HealthyPlacesIndexScoreforProjectLocation(b)ProjectLocatedinaDesignatedDisadvantagedCommunity(SenateBill535)ProjectLocatedinaLow-IncomeCommunity(AssemblyBill1550)ProjectLocatedinaCommunityAirPro
tectionProgramCommunity(AssemblyBill617)
a:ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.b:ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greater
than50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.NoHealth&EquityMeasuresselected.Health&EquityEvaluationScorecardnotcompleted.NoHealth&EquityCustomMeasurescreated.
JustificationSeeNoteA.1SeeNoteA.2
29 /29
ScreenConstruction:ConstructionPhasesConstruction:TripsandVMT
8.UserChangestoDefaultData
1 /34
2 /34
3 /34
4 /34
5 /34
Description—
Population—
SpecialLandscapeArea(sqft)—
LandscapeArea(sqft)0.00
ValueDowntownSPUpdate-Operations(2024)2024—Plan/communityCounty3.5017.633.92112919374658,-118.41555573938703LosAngeles-SouthCoastElSegundoSouthCoastAQMDSouthCoast45347SouthernCaliforniaEdisonSouthern
CaliforniaGas2022.1.1.19
6 /34
BuildingArea(sqft)130,000
LotAcreage2.98
Unit1000sqft
Size130
DataFieldProjectNameOperationalYearLeadAgencyLandUseScaleAnalysisLevelforDefaultsWindspeed(m/s)Precipitation(days)LocationCountyCityAirDistrictAirBasinTAZEDFZElectricUtilityGasUtilityAppVersionLandUs
eSubtypeStripMall
1.BasicProjectInformation
CO2e—103,177—98,946—89,323—14,789
R—360—13.2—139—23.0
———
N2O—3.79—3.97—3.54—0.59
CH4—60.0—60.1—59.6—9.87
——888
CO2T—100,189—96,245—86,639—14,344
NBCO2—99,642—95,698—86,092—14,254
———
BCO2—547—547—547—90.5
PM2.5T—20.6—20.6—17.9—3.27
0.000.000.00
PM2.5D—19.8—19.8—17.2—3.14
7 /34
PM2.5E—0.76—0.74—0.69—0.13
200,00024,000288,000
PM10T—79.0—78.9—68.5—12.5
PM10D—78.1—78.1—67.8—12.4
4.590.557.89
PM10E—0.81—0.78—0.73—0.13
SO2—0.90—0.86—0.76—0.14
1000sqft1000sqftDwellingUnit
CO—419—352—340—62.0
NOx—36.8—39.9—35.9—6.55
20024.0300
ROG—58.0—53.3—51.2—9.35
TOG—47.8—42.8—40.4—7.38
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseUn/Mit.Daily,Summer(Max)Unmit.Daily,Winter(Max)Unmit.AverageDaily(Max)Unmit.Annual(Max)Unmit.
Nomeasuresselected 2.EmissionsSummary
CO2e—91,4091099,2648761,5153.97103,177—87,2870.009,2648761,5153.9798,946—77,59074.89,2648761,515
R—356————3.97360—9.23————3.9713.2—135————
N2O—3.43<0.0050.080.280.00—3.79—3.620.000.080.280.00—3.97—3.19<0.0050.080.280.00
CH4—4.14<0.0050.8511.743.3—60.0—4.300.000.8511.743.3—60.1—3.75<0.0050.8511.743.3
CO2T—89,9271099,220500433—100,189—86,0930.009,220500433—96,245—76,41274.59,220500433
NBCO2—89,9271099,2203860.00—99,642—86,0930.009,2203860.00—95,698—76,41274.59,2203860.00
BCO2——0.00—114433—547——0.00—114433—547——0.00—114433
PM2.5T—20.40.030.20———20.6—20.40.000.20———20.6—17.70.020.20——
PM2.5D—19.8—————19.8—19.8—————19.8—17.2————
8 /34
PM2.5E—0.540.030.20———0.76—0.540.000.20———0.74—0.470.020.20——
PM10T—78.70.040.20———79.0—78.70.000.20———78.9—68.30.020.20——
PM10D—78.1—————78.1—78.1—————78.1—67.8————
PM10E—0.580.040.20———0.81—0.580.000.20———0.78—0.510.020.20——
SO2—0.88<0.0050.02———0.90—0.840.000.02———0.86—0.75<0.0050.02——
CO—38532.31.81———419—3500.001.81———352—31622.21.81——
NOx—34.00.302.58———36.8—37.30.002.58———39.9—33.10.202.58——
ROG—38.619.20.14———58.0—38.115.10.14———53.3—33.217.90.14——
TOG—43.14.380.29———47.8—42.60.000.29———42.8—37.13.000.29——
SectorDaily,Summer(Max)MobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalDaily,Winter(Max)MobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalAverageDailyMobileAreaEnergyWaterWaste
3.9789,323—12,84612.41,5341452510.6614,789CO2e—52,24717,6657,574
3.97139—22.3————0.6623.0R—20368.829.5
—3.54—0.53<0.0050.010.050.00—0.59N2O—1.960.660.28
—59.6—0.62<0.0050.141.947.17—9.87CH4—2.360.800.34
—86,639—12,65112.31,52682.771.7—14,344CO2T—51,40117,3797,451
—86,092—12,65112.31,52663.90.00—14,254NBCO2—51,40117,3797,451
—547——0.00—18.871.7—90.5BCO2————
—17.9—3.23<0.0050.04———3.27PM2.5T—11.73.941.69
—17.2—3.14—————3.14PM2.5D—11.33.841.64
9 /34
—0.69—0.09<0.0050.04———0.13PM2.5E—0.310.100.04
—68.5—12.5<0.0050.04———12.5PM10T—45.015.26.52
—67.8—12.4—————12.4PM10D—44.715.16.48
—0.73—0.09<0.0050.04———0.13PM10E—0.330.110.05
—0.76—0.14<0.005<0.005———0.14SO2—0.500.170.07
—340—57.74.040.33———62.0CO—22074.331.9
—35.9—6.040.040.47———6.55NOx—19.46.552.81
—51.2—6.053.270.03———9.35ROG—21.97.413.18
—40.4—6.780.550.05———7.38TOG—24.58.273.55
Refrig.TotalAnnualMobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuilding
4.OperationsEmissionsDetails
13,92391,409—49,89016,8687,23213,29787,287—7,6662,1439172,12112,846
54.1356—5.281.780.761.409.23—13.33.721.593.6822.3
0.533.43—2.060.700.300.563.62—0.310.090.040.090.53
0.644.14—2.450.830.350.674.30—0.370.100.040.100.62
13,69689,927—49,20916,6387,13313,11386,093—7,5492,1109032,08912,651
13,69689,927—49,20916,6387,13313,11386,093—7,5492,1109032,08912,651
——————————————
3.1020.4—11.73.941.693.1020.4—1.930.540.230.533.23
3.0219.8—11.33.841.643.0219.8—1.870.520.220.523.14
10 /34
0.080.54—0.310.100.040.080.54—0.050.010.010.010.09
12.078.7—45.015.26.5212.078.7—7.442.080.892.0512.5
11.978.1—44.715.16.4811.978.1—7.382.060.882.0412.4
0.090.58—0.330.110.050.090.58—0.060.020.010.020.09
0.130.88—0.480.160.070.130.84—0.080.020.010.020.14
59.1385—20067.528.953.8350—34.49.604.119.6157.7
5.2334.0—21.37.193.085.7437.3—3.601.010.431.016.04
6.1138.6—21.67.303.136.0238.1—3.591.000.431.046.05
6.8043.1—24.28.173.506.7142.6—4.011.120.481.166.78
ApartmentsTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
CO2e—1,2273,4244111,0576,118—1,2273,4244111,0576,118—203
R——————————————
N2O—0.010.04<0.0050.010.07—0.010.04<0.0050.010.07—<0.005
CH4—0.120.320.040.100.58—0.120.320.040.100.58—0.02
CO2T—1,2203,4044091,0506,083—1,2203,4044091,0506,083—202
NBCO2—1,2203,4044091,0506,083—1,2203,4044091,0506,083—202
BCO2——————————————
PM2.5T——————————————
PM2.5D——————————————
11 /34
PM2.5E——————————————
PM10T——————————————
PM10D——————————————
PM10E——————————————
SO2——————————————
CO——————————————
NOx——————————————
ROG——————————————
TOG——————————————
LandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripM
all
56768.01751,013CO2e—2501,6291951,0713,146—250
————R————————
0.01<0.005<0.0050.01N2O—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.0050.01—<0.005
0.050.010.020.10CH4—0.020.140.020.090.28—0.02
56467.61741,007CO2T—2491,6251951,0683,137—249
56467.61741,007NBCO2—2491,6251951,0683,137—249
————BCO2————————
————PM2.5T—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM2.5D————————
12 /34
————PM2.5E—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM10T—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM10D————————
————PM10E—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————SO2—<0.0050.01<0.0050.010.02—<0.005
————CO—0.181.140.140.361.81—0.18
————NOx—0.211.360.160.842.58—0.21
————ROG—0.010.070.010.050.14—0.01
————TOG—0.020.150.020.100.29—0.02
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMall
1,6291951,0713,146—41.427032.4177521CO2e—0.00
——————————R——
<0.005<0.005<0.0050.01—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005N2O—0.00
0.140.020.090.28—<0.0050.02<0.0050.020.05CH4—0.00
1,6251951,0683,137—41.326932.3177519CO2T—0.00
1,6251951,0683,137—41.326932.3177519NBCO2—0.00
——————————BCO2—0.00
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM2.5T—0.00
——————————PM2.5D——
13 /34
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM2.5E—0.00
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM10T—0.00
——————————PM10D——
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM10E—0.00
0.01<0.0050.010.02—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005SO2—0.00
1.140.140.361.81—0.030.210.030.070.33CO—0.00
1.360.160.842.58—0.040.250.030.150.47NOx—0.00
0.070.010.050.14—<0.0050.01<0.0050.010.03ROG—0.00
0.150.020.100.29—<0.0050.03<0.0050.020.05TOG—0.00
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalSourceDaily,Summer(Max)Hearths
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.412.4
———————————————
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.312.3
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.312.3
———0.00—0.00——0.00—0.00———0.00
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
———————————————
14 /34
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——0.040.04—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
———————————————
——0.040.04—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——32.332.3—0.00——0.00—0.00——4.044.04
——0.300.30—0.00——0.00—0.00——0.040.04
13.71.394.0819.2—0.0013.71.3915.1—0.002.510.250.513.27
——4.384.38—0.00——0.00—0.00——0.550.55
ConsumerArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotalDaily,Winter(Max)HearthsConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsTotalAnnualHearthsConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotal
CO2e—14252544.4165876—14252544.4165876
R————————————
N2O—0.050.170.010.050.28—0.050.170.010.050.28
CH4—1.907.010.592.2011.7—1.907.010.592.2011.7
CO2T—81.129925.494.1500—81.129925.494.1500
NBCO2—62.623119.672.7386—62.623119.672.7386
BCO2—18.568.15.7721.4114—18.568.15.7721.4114
PM2.5T————————————
PM2.5D————————————
15 /34
PM2.5E————————————
PM10T————————————
PM10D————————————
PM10E————————————
SO2————————————
CO————————————
NOx————————————
ROG————————————
TOG————————————
LandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
—23.586.97.3627.3145CO2e—2573514894181,515
——————R——————
—0.010.03<0.0050.010.05N2O—0.000.000.000.000.00
—0.311.160.100.361.94CH4—7.3510.014.011.943.3
—13.449.54.2015.682.7CO2T—73.6100140120433
—10.438.33.2412.063.9NBCO2—0.000.000.000.000.00
—3.0511.30.963.5518.8BCO2—73.6100140120433
——————PM2.5T——————
——————PM2.5D——————
16 /34
——————PM2.5E——————
——————PM10T——————
——————PM10D——————
——————PM10E——————
——————SO2——————
——————CO——————
——————NOx——————
——————ROG——————
——————TOG——————
AnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
—2573514894181,515—42.658.180.969.3251CO2e
————————————R
—0.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00N2O
—7.3510.014.011.943.3—1.221.662.311.987.17CH4
—73.6100140120433—12.216.623.119.871.7CO2T
—0.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00NBCO2
—73.6100140120433—12.216.623.119.871.7BCO2
————————————PM2.5T
————————————PM2.5D
17 /34
————————————PM2.5E
————————————PM10T
————————————PM10D
————————————PM10E
————————————SO2
————————————CO
————————————NOx
————————————ROG
————————————TOG
Daily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUse
—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.130.08
—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.130.08
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
18 /34
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
Daily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGene
ralOfficeBuilding
0.100.340.66CO2e——————
0.100.340.66R——————
———N2O——————
———CH4——————
———CO2T——————
———NBCO2——————
———BCO2——————
———PM2.5T——————
———PM2.5D——————
19 /34
———PM2.5E——————
———PM10T——————
———PM10D——————
———PM10E——————
———SO2——————
———CO——————
———NOx——————
———ROG——————
———TOG——————
MedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalEquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
20 /34
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
EquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalEquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
21 /34
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
VegetationDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e———————————————————
R———————————————————
N2O———————————————————
CH4———————————————————
CO2T———————————————————
NBCO2———————————————————
BCO2———————————————————
PM2.5T———————————————————
PM2.5D———————————————————
22 /34
PM2.5E———————————————————
PM10T———————————————————
PM10D———————————————————
PM10E———————————————————
SO2———————————————————
CO———————————————————
NOx———————————————————
ROG———————————————————
TOG———————————————————
SpeciesDaily,Summer(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—Daily,Winter(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—AnnualAvoidedSubtotal
—————
—————
VMT/Year21,058,5325,886,0402,518,0535,817,883
—————
—————
VMT/Sunday29,0451,53137312,606
—————
—————
VMT/Saturday59,7684,8342,24915,134
—————
—————
VMT/Weekday63,01021,3049,13416,767
—————
Unmitigated(number)—00
23 /34
—————
Trips/Year1,925,589538,219230,250566,271
—————
—————
Trips/Sunday2,65614034.11,227
—————
—————
Trips/Saturday5,4654422061,473
—————
—————
Trips/Weekday5,7621,9488351,632
—————
—————
SequestSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—LandUseTypeStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseHearthTypeApartmentsMidRiseWoodFireplacesGasFireplaces
5.ActivityData
NaturalGas(kBTU/yr)778,3035,069,293608,3153,332,053
ParkingAreaCoated(sqft)—
Value0.00250N2O0.00400.00400.00400.0040
Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)177,000
0000000CH40.03300.03300.03300.0330
24 /34
Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)531,000
Unitday/yrday/yrCO2349349349349
ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)194,400
Electricity(kWh/yr)1,276,7783,564,057427,6871,099,750
PropaneFireplacesElectricFireplacesNoFireplacesConventionalWoodStovesCatalyticWoodStovesNon-CatalyticWoodStovesPelletWoodStovesResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)583200SeasonSnowDaysSummerDaysLandUse
StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRise
TimesServiced18.01.00
ServiceLeakRate4.000.00
OutdoorWater(gal/year)0.000.000.000.00Cogeneration(kWh/year)————
OperationsLeakRate4.001.00
Quantity(kg)<0.0050.04
25 /34
GWP2,0881,430
IndoorWater(gal/year)9,629,42835,546,7503,011,53311,182,140Waste(ton/year)137186259222
RefrigerantR-410AR-134a
EquipmentTypeOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsStand-aloneretailrefrigeratorsandfreezers
LandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseLandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseLandUseTypeStripMallStripMall
20.01.0018.01.0018.010.01.00
LoadFactorLoadFactor
AnnualHeatInput(MMBtu/yr)
7.500.004.000.004.002.500.00
HorsepowerHorsepower
DailyHeatInput(MMBtu/day)
7.500.604.000.604.002.500.60
HoursPerDayHoursperYear
<0.0050.02<0.0050.45<0.005<0.0050.12BoilerRating(MMBtu/hr)
26 /34
NumberperDayHoursperDay
3,9221,4302,0881,4302,0882,0881,430
Number
EngineTierNumberperDay
R-404AR-134aR-410AR-134aR-410AR-410AR-134a
FuelType
FuelTypeFuelType
Walk-inrefrigeratorsandfreezersHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezersOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezersOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsAverageroomA/C&OtherresidentialA/Can
dheatpumpsHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezers
StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseApartmentsMidRiseEquipmentTypeEquipmentTypeEquipmentType
FinalAcresNaturalGasSaved(btu/year)
FinalAcresUnitannualdaysofextremeheat
FuelTypeInitialAcresElectricitySaved(kWh/year)
27 /34
InitialAcresResultforProjectLocation0.00
VegetationSoilTypeNumber
EquipmentTypeVegetationLandUseTypeBiomassCoverTypeTreeTypeClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeat
6.ClimateRiskDetailedReport Cal-Adaptmidcentury2040–2059averageprojectionsforfourhazardsarereportedbelowforyourprojectlocation.TheseareunderRepresentationConcentrationPathway(RCP)8.5whichassumesGHGem
issionswillcontinuetorisestronglythrough2050andthenplateauaround2100.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
annualdayswithprecipitationabove20mmmetersofinundationdepthannualhectaresburned
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
28 /34
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
0.000.000.00
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradation
TemperatureandExtremeHeatdataareforgridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Theprojectionisbasedonthe98thhistoricalpercentileofdailymaximum/minimumtemperaturesfromobservedhistoricaldata(32climatemodelens
emblefromCal-Adapt,2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5). Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.ExtremePrecipitationdataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Thethresholdof20mmisequ
ivalenttoabout¾aninchofrain,whichwouldbelighttomoderaterainfallifreceivedoverafulldayorheavyrainifreceivedoveraperiodof2to4hours.Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.SeaLevelRised
ataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromRadkeetal.(2017),asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderdifferentincrementsofsealevelrisecoupledwithextrem
estormevents.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialinundationdepthforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier
(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis50meters(m)by50m,orabout164feet(ft)by164ft.Wildfiredataarefor
thegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromUCDavis,asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderhistoricaldataofclimate,vegetation,populationdensity,andlarge(>400ha
)firehistory.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialwildfireprobabilitiesforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer
/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.Thesensitivi
tyscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectrefer
stoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalcu
latedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresdonotincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectCensusTract—32.172.095.68.9548.90.00
29 /34
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradationIndicatorExposureIndicatorsAQ-OzoneAQ-PMAQ-DPMDrinkingWaterLeadRiskH
ousingPesticides
Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofa
projectreferstoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilitysc
oresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.7.HealthandEquityDetails ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscor
eis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
89.962.7—58.669.298.758.739.0—12.822.019.6—6.5233.24.5923.758.4ResultforProjectCensusTract—82.856409692.634415571.46156807—
30 /34
ToxicReleasesTrafficEffectIndicatorsCleanUpSitesGroundwaterHazWasteFacilities/GeneratorsImpairedWaterBodiesSolidWasteSensitivePopulationAsthmaCardio-vascularLowBirthWeightsSocioeconomicFactorIndicato
rsEducationHousingLinguisticPovertyUnemploymentIndicatorEconomicAbovePovertyEmployedMedianHIEducation
ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
79.8280508110035.76286411—74.5797510669.25445913—91.0817400257.05119979—23.3286282681.3550622445.617862182.3995893754.632362376—17.6825356176.697035878.7373283795.3933016859.34813294—73.784165280.084
.50.00.0
31 /34
Bachelor'sorhigherHighschoolenrollmentPreschoolenrollmentTransportationAutoAccessActivecommutingSocial2-parenthouseholdsVotingNeighborhoodAlcoholavailabilityParkaccessRetaildensitySupermarketaccessTr
eecanopyHousingHomeownershipHousinghabitabilityLow-inchomeownerseverehousingcostburdenLow-increnterseverehousingcostburdenUncrowdedhousingHealthOutcomesInsuredadultsArthritisAsthmaERAdmissionsHighBlo
odPressureCancer(excludingskin)
0.00.00.00.068.887.280.265.40.00.00.019.60.00.0—0.00.00.0—0.00.031.069.378.414.477.2—
32 /34
AsthmaCoronaryHeartDiseaseChronicObstructivePulmonaryDiseaseDiagnosedDiabetesLifeExpectancyatBirthCognitivelyDisabledPhysically DisabledHeartAttackERAdmissionsMentalHealthNotGoodChronicKidneyDiseaseO
besityPedestrianInjuriesPhysicalHealthNotGoodStrokeHealthRiskBehaviorsBingeDrinkingCurrentSmokerNoLeisureTimeforPhysicalActivityClimateChangeExposuresWildfireRiskSLRInundationAreaChildrenElderlyEngli
shSpeakingForeign-bornOutdoorWorkersClimateChangeAdaptiveCapacity
19.243.523.0—11.3—48.5ResultforProjectCensusTract26.079.0NoNoNoJustification
33 /34
ImperviousSurfaceCoverTrafficDensityTrafficAccessOtherIndicesHardshipOtherDecisionSupport2016VotingMetricCalEnviroScreen4.0ScoreforProjectLocation(a)HealthyPlacesIndexScoreforProjectLocation(b)Projec
tLocatedinaDesignatedDisadvantagedCommunity(SenateBill535)ProjectLocatedinaLow-IncomeCommunity(AssemblyBill1550)ProjectLocatedinaCommunityAirProtectionProgramCommunity(AssemblyBill617)Screen
a:ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.b:ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greater
than50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.NoHealth&EquityMeasuresselected.Health&EquityEvaluationScorecardnotcompleted.NoHealth&EquityCustomMeasurescreated.8.Us
erChangestoDefaultData
SeeNoteA.3
34 /34
Operations:Hearths
1 /34
2 /34
3 /34
4 /34
5 /34
Description—
Population—
SpecialLandscapeArea(sqft)—
LandscapeArea(sqft)0.00
ValueDowntownSPUpdate-Operations(2030)2030—Plan/communityCounty3.5017.633.92112919374658,-118.41555573938703LosAngeles-SouthCoastElSegundoSouthCoastAQMDSouthCoast45347SouthernCaliforniaEdisonSouthern
CaliforniaGas2022.1.1.19
6 /34
BuildingArea(sqft)130,000
LotAcreage2.98
Unit1000sqft
Size130
DataFieldProjectNameOperationalYearLeadAgencyLandUseScaleAnalysisLevelforDefaultsWindspeed(m/s)Precipitation(days)LocationCountyCityAirDistrictAirBasinTAZEDFZElectricUtilityGasUtilityAppVersionLandUs
eSubtypeStripMall
1.BasicProjectInformation
CO2e—90,509—86,912—78,391—12,979
R—182—8.60—71.5—11.8
———
N2O—3.16—3.30—2.94—0.49
CH4—59.1—59.2—58.7—9.72
——888
CO2T—87,910—84,442—75,974—12,578
NBCO2—87,363—83,896—75,427—12,488
———
BCO2—547—547—547—90.5
PM2.5T—20.4—20.4—17.7—3.24
0.000.000.00
PM2.5D—19.8—19.8—17.2—3.14
7 /34
PM2.5E—0.62—0.59—0.56—0.10
200,00024,000288,000
PM10T—78.7—78.7—68.3—12.5
PM10D—78.1—78.1—67.7—12.4
4.590.557.89
PM10E—0.65—0.62—0.59—0.11
SO2—0.79—0.76—0.68—0.12
1000sqft1000sqftDwellingUnit
CO—323—264—261—47.6
NOx—25.0—26.8—24.2—4.42
20024.0300
ROG—48.6—44.3—43.3—7.89
TOG—37.2—32.7—31.4—5.74
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseUn/Mit.Daily,Summer(Max)Unmit.Daily,Winter(Max)Unmit.AverageDaily(Max)Unmit.Annual(Max)Unmit.
Nomeasuresselected 2.EmissionsSummary
CO2e—80,3711097,7317791,5153.9790,509—76,8830.007,7317791,5153.9786,912—68,28874.87,7317791,515
R—178————3.97182—4.62————3.978.60—67.5————
N2O—2.80<0.0050.080.280.00—3.16—2.940.000.080.280.00—3.30—2.59<0.0050.080.280.00
CH4—3.21<0.0050.8511.743.3—59.1—3.320.000.8511.743.3—59.2—2.89<0.0050.8511.743.3
CO2T—79,2781097,687403433—87,910—75,9200.007,687403433—84,442—67,37774.57,687403433
NBCO2—79,2781097,6872890.00—87,363—75,9200.007,6872890.00—83,896—67,37774.57,6872890.00
BCO2——0.00—114433—547——0.00—114433—547——0.00—114433
PM2.5T—20.20.030.20———20.4—20.20.000.20———20.4—17.50.020.20——
PM2.5D—19.8—————19.8—19.8—————19.8—17.2————
8 /34
PM2.5E—0.390.030.20———0.62—0.390.000.20———0.59—0.340.020.20——
PM10T—78.50.040.20———78.7—78.50.000.20———78.7—68.10.020.20——
PM10D—78.1—————78.1—78.1—————78.1—67.7————
PM10E—0.420.040.20———0.65—0.420.000.20———0.62—0.370.020.20——
SO2—0.78<0.0050.02———0.79—0.740.000.02———0.76—0.66<0.0050.02——
CO—28932.51.81———323—2620.001.81———264—23722.21.81——
NOx—22.10.292.58———25.0—24.20.002.58———26.8—21.50.202.58——
ROG—29.319.10.14———48.6—29.015.10.14———44.3—25.217.90.14——
TOG—32.74.300.29———37.2—32.40.000.29———32.7—28.22.940.29——
SectorDaily,Summer(Max)MobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalDaily,Winter(Max)MobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalAverageDailyMobileAreaEnergyWaterWaste
3.9778,391—11,30612.41,2801292510.6612,979CO2e—45,93815,5326,659
3.9771.5—11.2————0.6611.8R—10234.514.8
—2.94—0.43<0.0050.010.050.00—0.49N2O—1.600.540.23
—58.7—0.48<0.0050.141.947.17—9.72CH4—1.830.620.27
—75,974—11,15512.31,27366.671.7—12,578CO2T—45,31515,3216,569
—75,427—11,15512.31,27347.80.00—12,488NBCO2—45,31515,3216,569
—547——0.00—18.871.7—90.5BCO2————
—17.7—3.20<0.0050.04———3.24PM2.5T—11.63.911.67
—17.2—3.14—————3.14PM2.5D—11.33.831.64
9 /34
—0.56—0.06<0.0050.04———0.10PM2.5E—0.220.080.03
—68.3—12.4<0.0050.04———12.5PM10T—44.915.26.50
—67.7—12.4—————12.4PM10D—44.615.16.47
—0.59—0.07<0.0050.04———0.11PM10E—0.240.080.03
—0.68—0.12<0.005<0.005———0.12SO2—0.440.150.06
—261—43.24.060.33———47.6CO—16555.723.9
—24.2—3.920.040.47———4.42NOx—12.64.271.83
—43.3—4.613.260.03———7.89ROG—16.65.622.41
—31.4—5.150.540.05———5.74TOG—18.56.272.69
Refrig.TotalAnnualMobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuilding
4.OperationsEmissionsDetails
12,24280,371—43,94414,8576,37011,71276,883—6,7471,8868071,86711,306
27.1178—2.640.890.380.704.62—6.671.870.801.8411.2
0.432.80—1.680.570.240.452.94—0.260.070.030.070.43
0.503.21—1.890.640.270.513.32—0.280.080.030.080.48
12,07479,278—43,39414,6726,29011,56375,920—6,6571,8617961,84211,155
12,07479,278—43,39414,6726,29011,56375,920—6,6571,8617961,84211,155
——————————————
3.0720.2—11.63.911.673.0720.2—1.910.530.230.533.20
3.0219.8—11.33.831.643.0219.8—1.870.520.220.523.14
10 /34
0.060.39—0.220.080.030.060.39—0.040.01<0.0050.010.06
11.978.5—44.915.26.5011.978.5—7.412.070.892.0512.4
11.978.1—44.615.16.4711.978.1—7.372.060.882.0412.4
0.060.42—0.240.080.030.060.42—0.040.01<0.0050.010.07
0.120.78—0.420.140.060.110.74—0.070.020.010.020.12
44.3289—15050.621.740.4262—25.87.203.087.2143.2
3.4222.1—13.84.672.003.7424.2—2.330.650.280.653.92
4.6429.3—16.45.562.384.5929.0—2.730.760.330.794.61
5.1532.7—18.46.222.675.1132.4—3.050.850.360.885.15
ApartmentsTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
CO2e—9192,5663087924,585—9192,5663087924,585—152
R——————————————
N2O—0.010.04<0.0050.010.07—0.010.04<0.0050.010.07—<0.005
CH4—0.120.320.040.100.58—0.120.320.040.100.58—0.02
CO2T—9122,5463067864,550—9122,5463067864,550—151
NBCO2—9122,5463067864,550—9122,5463067864,550—151
BCO2——————————————
PM2.5T——————————————
PM2.5D——————————————
11 /34
PM2.5E——————————————
PM10T——————————————
PM10D——————————————
PM10E——————————————
SO2——————————————
CO——————————————
NOx——————————————
ROG——————————————
TOG——————————————
LandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripM
all
42551.0131759CO2e—2501,6291951,0713,146—250
————R————————
0.01<0.005<0.0050.01N2O—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.0050.01—<0.005
0.050.010.020.10CH4—0.020.140.020.090.28—0.02
42250.6130753CO2T—2491,6251951,0683,137—249
42250.6130753NBCO2—2491,6251951,0683,137—249
————BCO2————————
————PM2.5T—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM2.5D————————
12 /34
————PM2.5E—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM10T—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM10D————————
————PM10E—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————SO2—<0.0050.01<0.0050.010.02—<0.005
————CO—0.181.140.140.361.81—0.18
————NOx—0.211.360.160.842.58—0.21
————ROG—0.010.070.010.050.14—0.01
————TOG—0.020.150.020.100.29—0.02
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMall
1,6291951,0713,146—41.427032.4177521CO2e—0.00
——————————R——
<0.005<0.005<0.0050.01—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005N2O—0.00
0.140.020.090.28—<0.0050.02<0.0050.020.05CH4—0.00
1,6251951,0683,137—41.326932.3177519CO2T—0.00
1,6251951,0683,137—41.326932.3177519NBCO2—0.00
——————————BCO2—0.00
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM2.5T—0.00
——————————PM2.5D——
13 /34
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM2.5E—0.00
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM10T—0.00
——————————PM10D——
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM10E—0.00
0.01<0.0050.010.02—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005SO2—0.00
1.140.140.361.81—0.030.210.030.070.33CO—0.00
1.360.160.842.58—0.040.250.030.150.47NOx—0.00
0.070.010.050.14—<0.0050.01<0.0050.010.03ROG—0.00
0.150.020.100.29—<0.0050.03<0.0050.020.05TOG—0.00
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalSourceDaily,Summer(Max)Hearths
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.412.4
———————————————
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.312.3
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.312.3
———0.00—0.00——0.00—0.00———0.00
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
———————————————
14 /34
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——0.040.04—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
———————————————
——0.040.04—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——32.532.5—0.00——0.00—0.00——4.064.06
——0.290.29—0.00——0.00—0.00——0.040.04
13.71.394.0019.1—0.0013.71.3915.1—0.002.510.250.503.26
——4.304.30—0.00——0.00—0.00——0.540.54
ConsumerArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotalDaily,Winter(Max)HearthsConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsTotalAnnualHearthsConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotal
CO2e—12646639.5147779—12646639.5147779
R————————————
N2O—0.050.170.010.050.28—0.050.170.010.050.28
CH4—1.907.010.592.2011.7—1.907.010.592.2011.7
CO2T—65.324120.475.8403—65.324120.475.8403
NBCO2—46.817314.654.4289—46.817314.654.4289
BCO2—18.568.15.7721.4114—18.568.15.7721.4114
PM2.5T————————————
PM2.5D————————————
15 /34
PM2.5E————————————
PM10T————————————
PM10D————————————
PM10E————————————
SO2————————————
CO————————————
NOx————————————
ROG————————————
TOG————————————
LandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
—20.977.26.5424.3129CO2e—2573514894181,515
——————R——————
—0.010.03<0.0050.010.05N2O—0.000.000.000.000.00
—0.311.160.100.361.94CH4—7.3510.014.011.943.3
—10.839.93.3812.666.6CO2T—73.6100140120433
—7.7528.62.439.0047.8NBCO2—0.000.000.000.000.00
—3.0511.30.963.5518.8BCO2—73.6100140120433
——————PM2.5T——————
——————PM2.5D——————
16 /34
——————PM2.5E——————
——————PM10T——————
——————PM10D——————
——————PM10E——————
——————SO2——————
——————CO——————
——————NOx——————
——————ROG——————
——————TOG——————
AnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
—2573514894181,515—42.658.180.969.3251CO2e
————————————R
—0.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00N2O
—7.3510.014.011.943.3—1.221.662.311.987.17CH4
—73.6100140120433—12.216.623.119.871.7CO2T
—0.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00NBCO2
—73.6100140120433—12.216.623.119.871.7BCO2
————————————PM2.5T
————————————PM2.5D
17 /34
————————————PM2.5E
————————————PM10T
————————————PM10D
————————————PM10E
————————————SO2
————————————CO
————————————NOx
————————————ROG
————————————TOG
Daily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUse
—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.130.08
—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.130.08
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
18 /34
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
Daily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGene
ralOfficeBuilding
0.100.340.66CO2e——————
0.100.340.66R——————
———N2O——————
———CH4——————
———CO2T——————
———NBCO2——————
———BCO2——————
———PM2.5T——————
———PM2.5D——————
19 /34
———PM2.5E——————
———PM10T——————
———PM10D——————
———PM10E——————
———SO2——————
———CO——————
———NOx——————
———ROG——————
———TOG——————
MedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalEquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
20 /34
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
EquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalEquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
21 /34
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
VegetationDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e———————————————————
R———————————————————
N2O———————————————————
CH4———————————————————
CO2T———————————————————
NBCO2———————————————————
BCO2———————————————————
PM2.5T———————————————————
PM2.5D———————————————————
22 /34
PM2.5E———————————————————
PM10T———————————————————
PM10D———————————————————
PM10E———————————————————
SO2———————————————————
CO———————————————————
NOx———————————————————
ROG———————————————————
TOG———————————————————
SpeciesDaily,Summer(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—Daily,Winter(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—AnnualAvoidedSubtotal
—————
—————
VMT/Year21,058,5325,886,0402,518,0535,817,883
—————
—————
VMT/Sunday29,0451,53137312,606
—————
—————
VMT/Saturday59,7684,8342,24915,134
—————
—————
VMT/Weekday63,01021,3049,13416,767
—————
Unmitigated(number)—00
23 /34
—————
Trips/Year1,925,589538,219230,250566,271
—————
—————
Trips/Sunday2,65614034.11,227
—————
—————
Trips/Saturday5,4654422061,473
—————
—————
Trips/Weekday5,7621,9488351,632
—————
—————
SequestSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—LandUseTypeStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseHearthTypeApartmentsMidRiseWoodFireplacesGasFireplaces
5.ActivityData
NaturalGas(kBTU/yr)778,3035,069,293608,3153,332,053
ParkingAreaCoated(sqft)—
Value0.00250N2O0.00400.00400.00400.0040
Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)177,000
0000000CH40.03300.03300.03300.0330
24 /34
Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)531,000
Unitday/yrday/yrCO2261261261261
ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)194,400
Electricity(kWh/yr)1,276,7783,564,057427,6871,099,750
PropaneFireplacesElectricFireplacesNoFireplacesConventionalWoodStovesCatalyticWoodStovesNon-CatalyticWoodStovesPelletWoodStovesResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)583200SeasonSnowDaysSummerDaysLandUse
StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRise
TimesServiced18.01.00
ServiceLeakRate4.000.00
OutdoorWater(gal/year)0.000.000.000.00Cogeneration(kWh/year)————
OperationsLeakRate4.001.00
Quantity(kg)<0.0050.04
25 /34
GWP2,0881,430
IndoorWater(gal/year)9,629,42835,546,7503,011,53311,182,140Waste(ton/year)137186259222
RefrigerantR-410AR-134a
EquipmentTypeOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsStand-aloneretailrefrigeratorsandfreezers
LandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseLandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseLandUseTypeStripMallStripMall
20.01.0018.01.0018.010.01.00
LoadFactorLoadFactor
AnnualHeatInput(MMBtu/yr)
7.500.004.000.004.002.500.00
HorsepowerHorsepower
DailyHeatInput(MMBtu/day)
7.500.604.000.604.002.500.60
HoursPerDayHoursperYear
<0.0050.02<0.0050.45<0.005<0.0050.12BoilerRating(MMBtu/hr)
26 /34
NumberperDayHoursperDay
3,9221,4302,0881,4302,0882,0881,430
Number
EngineTierNumberperDay
R-404AR-134aR-410AR-134aR-410AR-410AR-134a
FuelType
FuelTypeFuelType
Walk-inrefrigeratorsandfreezersHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezersOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezersOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsAverageroomA/C&OtherresidentialA/Can
dheatpumpsHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezers
StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseApartmentsMidRiseEquipmentTypeEquipmentTypeEquipmentType
FinalAcresNaturalGasSaved(btu/year)
FinalAcresUnitannualdaysofextremeheat
FuelTypeInitialAcresElectricitySaved(kWh/year)
27 /34
InitialAcresResultforProjectLocation0.00
VegetationSoilTypeNumber
EquipmentTypeVegetationLandUseTypeBiomassCoverTypeTreeTypeClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeat
6.ClimateRiskDetailedReport Cal-Adaptmidcentury2040–2059averageprojectionsforfourhazardsarereportedbelowforyourprojectlocation.TheseareunderRepresentationConcentrationPathway(RCP)8.5whichassumesGHGem
issionswillcontinuetorisestronglythrough2050andthenplateauaround2100.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
annualdayswithprecipitationabove20mmmetersofinundationdepthannualhectaresburned
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
28 /34
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
0.000.000.00
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradation
TemperatureandExtremeHeatdataareforgridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Theprojectionisbasedonthe98thhistoricalpercentileofdailymaximum/minimumtemperaturesfromobservedhistoricaldata(32climatemodelens
emblefromCal-Adapt,2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5). Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.ExtremePrecipitationdataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Thethresholdof20mmisequ
ivalenttoabout¾aninchofrain,whichwouldbelighttomoderaterainfallifreceivedoverafulldayorheavyrainifreceivedoveraperiodof2to4hours.Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.SeaLevelRised
ataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromRadkeetal.(2017),asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderdifferentincrementsofsealevelrisecoupledwithextrem
estormevents.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialinundationdepthforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier
(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis50meters(m)by50m,orabout164feet(ft)by164ft.Wildfiredataarefor
thegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromUCDavis,asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderhistoricaldataofclimate,vegetation,populationdensity,andlarge(>400ha
)firehistory.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialwildfireprobabilitiesforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer
/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.Thesensitivi
tyscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectrefer
stoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalcu
latedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresdonotincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectCensusTract—32.172.095.68.9548.90.00
29 /34
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradationIndicatorExposureIndicatorsAQ-OzoneAQ-PMAQ-DPMDrinkingWaterLeadRiskH
ousingPesticides
Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofa
projectreferstoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilitysc
oresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.7.HealthandEquityDetails ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscor
eis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
89.962.7—58.669.298.758.739.0—12.822.019.6—6.5233.24.5923.758.4ResultforProjectCensusTract—82.856409692.634415571.46156807—
30 /34
ToxicReleasesTrafficEffectIndicatorsCleanUpSitesGroundwaterHazWasteFacilities/GeneratorsImpairedWaterBodiesSolidWasteSensitivePopulationAsthmaCardio-vascularLowBirthWeightsSocioeconomicFactorIndicato
rsEducationHousingLinguisticPovertyUnemploymentIndicatorEconomicAbovePovertyEmployedMedianHIEducation
ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
79.8280508110035.76286411—74.5797510669.25445913—91.0817400257.05119979—23.3286282681.3550622445.617862182.3995893754.632362376—17.6825356176.697035878.7373283795.3933016859.34813294—73.784165280.084
.50.00.0
31 /34
Bachelor'sorhigherHighschoolenrollmentPreschoolenrollmentTransportationAutoAccessActivecommutingSocial2-parenthouseholdsVotingNeighborhoodAlcoholavailabilityParkaccessRetaildensitySupermarketaccessTr
eecanopyHousingHomeownershipHousinghabitabilityLow-inchomeownerseverehousingcostburdenLow-increnterseverehousingcostburdenUncrowdedhousingHealthOutcomesInsuredadultsArthritisAsthmaERAdmissionsHighBlo
odPressureCancer(excludingskin)
0.00.00.00.068.887.280.265.40.00.00.019.60.00.0—0.00.00.0—0.00.031.069.378.414.477.2—
32 /34
AsthmaCoronaryHeartDiseaseChronicObstructivePulmonaryDiseaseDiagnosedDiabetesLifeExpectancyatBirthCognitivelyDisabledPhysically DisabledHeartAttackERAdmissionsMentalHealthNotGoodChronicKidneyDiseaseO
besityPedestrianInjuriesPhysicalHealthNotGoodStrokeHealthRiskBehaviorsBingeDrinkingCurrentSmokerNoLeisureTimeforPhysicalActivityClimateChangeExposuresWildfireRiskSLRInundationAreaChildrenElderlyEngli
shSpeakingForeign-bornOutdoorWorkersClimateChangeAdaptiveCapacity
19.243.523.0—11.3—48.5ResultforProjectCensusTract26.079.0NoNoNoJustification
33 /34
ImperviousSurfaceCoverTrafficDensityTrafficAccessOtherIndicesHardshipOtherDecisionSupport2016VotingMetricCalEnviroScreen4.0ScoreforProjectLocation(a)HealthyPlacesIndexScoreforProjectLocation(b)Projec
tLocatedinaDesignatedDisadvantagedCommunity(SenateBill535)ProjectLocatedinaLow-IncomeCommunity(AssemblyBill1550)ProjectLocatedinaCommunityAirProtectionProgramCommunity(AssemblyBill617)Screen
a:ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.b:ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greater
than50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.NoHealth&EquityMeasuresselected.Health&EquityEvaluationScorecardnotcompleted.NoHealth&EquityCustomMeasurescreated.8.Us
erChangestoDefaultData
SeeNoteA.3
34 /34
Operations:Hearths
1 /34
2 /34
3 /34
4 /34
5 /34
Description—
Population—
SpecialLandscapeArea(sqft)—
LandscapeArea(sqft)0.00
ValueDowntownSPUpdate-Operations(2040)2040—Plan/communityCounty3.5017.633.92112919374658,-118.41555573938703LosAngeles-SouthCoastElSegundoSouthCoastAQMDSouthCoast45347SouthernCaliforniaEdisonSouthern
CaliforniaGas2022.1.1.19
6 /34
BuildingArea(sqft)130,000
LotAcreage2.98
Unit1000sqft
Size130
DataFieldProjectNameOperationalYearLeadAgencyLandUseScaleAnalysisLevelforDefaultsWindspeed(m/s)Precipitation(days)LocationCountyCityAirDistrictAirBasinTAZEDFZElectricUtilityGasUtilityAppVersionLandUs
eSubtypeStripMall
1.BasicProjectInformation
CO2e—80,900—77,736—70,220—11,626
R—40.8—4.93—17.9—2.97
———
N2O—2.57—2.68—2.41—0.40
CH4—58.1—58.1—57.8—9.58
——888
CO2T—78,640—75,478—68,039—11,265
NBCO2—78,094—74,931—67,492—11,174
———
BCO2—547—547—547—90.5
PM2.5T—20.2—20.2—17.6—3.21
0.000.000.00
PM2.5D—19.8—19.8—17.1—3.13
7 /34
PM2.5E—0.47—0.44—0.43—0.08
200,00024,000288,000
PM10T—78.4—78.4—68.0—12.4
PM10D—77.9—77.9—67.6—12.3
4.590.557.89
PM10E—0.50—0.46—0.45—0.08
SO2—0.70—0.67—0.60—0.11
1000sqft1000sqftDwellingUnit
CO—266—212—214—39.0
NOx—17.8—19.0—17.3—3.15
20024.0300
ROG—41.9—37.8—37.6—6.87
TOG—29.6—25.2—24.9—4.55
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseUn/Mit.Daily,Summer(Max)Unmit.Daily,Winter(Max)Unmit.AverageDaily(Max)Unmit.Annual(Max)Unmit.
Nomeasuresselected 2.EmissionsSummary
CO2e—70,7621097,7317791,5153.9780,900—67,7070.007,7317791,5153.9777,736—60,11774.87,7317791,515
R—36.8————3.9740.8—0.96————3.974.93—14.0————
N2O—2.21<0.0050.080.280.00—2.57—2.330.000.080.280.00—2.68—2.05<0.0050.080.280.00
CH4—2.24<0.0050.8511.743.3—58.1—2.300.000.8511.743.3—58.1—2.01<0.0050.8511.743.3
CO2T—70,0091097,687403433—78,640—66,9550.007,687403433—75,478—59,44274.57,687403433
NBCO2—70,0091097,6872890.00—78,094—66,9550.007,6872890.00—74,931—59,44274.57,6872890.00
BCO2——0.00—114433—547——0.00—114433—547——0.00—114433
PM2.5T—20.00.030.20———20.2—20.00.000.20———20.2—17.40.020.20——
PM2.5D—19.8—————19.8—19.8—————19.8—17.1————
8 /34
PM2.5E—0.240.030.20———0.47—0.240.000.20———0.44—0.210.020.20——
PM10T—78.20.030.20———78.4—78.20.000.20———78.4—67.80.020.20——
PM10D—77.9—————77.9—77.9—————77.9—67.6————
PM10E—0.260.030.20———0.50—0.260.000.20———0.46—0.230.020.20——
SO2—0.69<0.0050.02———0.70—0.660.000.02———0.67—0.58<0.0050.02——
CO—23232.51.81———266—2100.001.81———212—19022.31.81——
NOx—15.00.292.58———17.8—16.40.002.58———19.0—14.50.202.58——
ROG—22.619.10.14———41.9—22.615.10.14———37.8—19.617.90.14——
TOG—25.04.300.29———29.6—24.90.000.29———25.2—21.72.950.29——
SectorDaily,Summer(Max)MobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalDaily,Winter(Max)MobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalAverageDailyMobileAreaEnergyWaterWaste
3.9770,220—9,95312.41,2801292510.6611,626CO2e—40,44613,6755,863
3.9717.9—2.31————0.662.97R—21.17.123.05
—2.41—0.34<0.0050.010.050.00—0.40N2O—1.260.430.18
—57.8—0.33<0.0050.141.947.17—9.58CH4—1.270.430.18
—68,039—9,84112.31,27366.671.7—11,265CO2T—40,01613,5305,801
—67,492—9,84112.31,27347.80.00—11,174NBCO2—40,01613,5305,801
—547——0.00—18.871.7—90.5BCO2————
—17.6—3.17<0.0050.04———3.21PM2.5T—11.43.871.66
—17.1—3.13—————3.13PM2.5D—11.33.821.64
9 /34
—0.43—0.04<0.0050.04———0.08PM2.5E—0.140.050.02
—68.0—12.4<0.0050.04———12.4PM10T—44.715.16.48
—67.6—12.3—————12.3PM10D—44.615.16.46
—0.45—0.04<0.0050.04———0.08PM10E—0.150.050.02
—0.60—0.11<0.005<0.005———0.11SO2—0.390.130.06
—214—34.64.060.33———39.0CO—13344.819.2
—17.3—2.650.040.47———3.15NOx—8.532.881.24
—37.6—3.583.260.03———6.87ROG—12.84.341.86
—24.9—3.960.540.05———4.55TOG—14.24.802.06
Refrig.TotalAnnualMobileAreaEnergyWaterWasteRefrig.TotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuilding
4.OperationsEmissionsDetails
10,77970,762—38,69913,0845,61010,31467,707—5,9391,6607101,6439,953
5.6036.8—0.550.180.080.150.96—1.380.390.160.382.31
0.342.21—1.330.450.190.362.33—0.200.060.020.060.34
0.352.24—1.310.440.190.362.30—0.200.060.020.060.33
10,66370,009—38,27012,9395,54810,19866,955—5,8731,6427021,6259,841
10,66370,009—38,27012,9395,54810,19866,955—5,8731,6427021,6259,841
——————————————
3.0520.0—11.43.871.663.0520.0—1.890.530.230.523.17
3.0119.8—11.33.821.643.0119.8—1.870.520.220.523.13
10 /34
0.040.24—0.140.050.020.040.24—0.020.01<0.0050.010.04
11.978.2—44.715.16.4811.978.2—7.392.060.882.0412.4
11.977.9—44.615.16.4611.977.9—7.362.060.882.0312.3
0.040.26—0.150.050.020.040.26—0.030.01<0.0050.010.04
0.100.69—0.380.130.050.100.66—0.060.020.010.020.11
35.6232—12040.517.432.3210—20.65.762.475.7734.6
2.3215.0—9.353.161.362.5416.4—1.570.440.190.442.65
3.5822.6—12.84.331.863.5722.6—2.120.590.250.613.58
3.9425.0—14.14.782.053.9324.9—2.350.660.280.683.96
ApartmentsTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
CO2e—9192,5663087924,585—9192,5663087924,585—152
R——————————————
N2O—0.010.04<0.0050.010.07—0.010.04<0.0050.010.07—<0.005
CH4—0.120.320.040.100.58—0.120.320.040.100.58—0.02
CO2T—9122,5463067864,550—9122,5463067864,550—151
NBCO2—9122,5463067864,550—9122,5463067864,550—151
BCO2——————————————
PM2.5T——————————————
PM2.5D——————————————
11 /34
PM2.5E——————————————
PM10T——————————————
PM10D——————————————
PM10E——————————————
SO2——————————————
CO——————————————
NOx——————————————
ROG——————————————
TOG——————————————
LandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripM
all
42551.0131759CO2e—2501,6291951,0713,146—250
————R————————
0.01<0.005<0.0050.01N2O—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.0050.01—<0.005
0.050.010.020.10CH4—0.020.140.020.090.28—0.02
42250.6130753CO2T—2491,6251951,0683,137—249
42250.6130753NBCO2—2491,6251951,0683,137—249
————BCO2————————
————PM2.5T—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM2.5D————————
12 /34
————PM2.5E—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM10T—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————PM10D————————
————PM10E—0.020.100.010.070.20—0.02
————SO2—<0.0050.01<0.0050.010.02—<0.005
————CO—0.181.140.140.361.81—0.18
————NOx—0.211.360.160.842.58—0.21
————ROG—0.010.070.010.050.14—0.01
————TOG—0.020.150.020.100.29—0.02
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMall
1,6291951,0713,146—41.427032.4177521CO2e—0.00
——————————R——
<0.005<0.005<0.0050.01—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005N2O—0.00
0.140.020.090.28—<0.0050.02<0.0050.020.05CH4—0.00
1,6251951,0683,137—41.326932.3177519CO2T—0.00
1,6251951,0683,137—41.326932.3177519NBCO2—0.00
——————————BCO2—0.00
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM2.5T—0.00
——————————PM2.5D——
13 /34
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM2.5E—0.00
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM10T—0.00
——————————PM10D——
0.100.010.070.20—<0.0050.02<0.0050.010.04PM10E—0.00
0.01<0.0050.010.02—<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005<0.005SO2—0.00
1.140.140.361.81—0.030.210.030.070.33CO—0.00
1.360.160.842.58—0.040.250.030.150.47NOx—0.00
0.070.010.050.14—<0.0050.01<0.0050.010.03ROG—0.00
0.150.020.100.29—<0.0050.03<0.0050.020.05TOG—0.00
GeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalSourceDaily,Summer(Max)Hearths
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.412.4
———————————————
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.312.3
——109109—0.00——0.00—0.00——12.312.3
———0.00—0.00——0.00—0.00———0.00
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
———————————————
14 /34
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
———————————————
——0.030.03—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——<0.005<0.005—0.00——0.00—0.00——<0.005<0.005
——32.532.5—0.00——0.00—0.00——4.064.06
——0.290.29—0.00——0.00—0.00——0.040.04
13.71.394.0119.1—0.0013.71.3915.1—0.002.510.250.503.26
——4.304.30—0.00——0.00—0.00——0.540.54
ConsumerArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotalDaily,Winter(Max)HearthsConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsTotalAnnualHearthsConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotal
CO2e—12646639.5147779—12646639.5147779
R————————————
N2O—0.050.170.010.050.28—0.050.170.010.050.28
CH4—1.907.010.592.2011.7—1.907.010.592.2011.7
CO2T—65.324120.475.8403—65.324120.475.8403
NBCO2—46.817314.654.4289—46.817314.654.4289
BCO2—18.568.15.7721.4114—18.568.15.7721.4114
PM2.5T————————————
PM2.5D————————————
15 /34
PM2.5E————————————
PM10T————————————
PM10D————————————
PM10E————————————
SO2————————————
CO————————————
NOx————————————
ROG————————————
TOG————————————
LandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
—20.977.26.5424.3129CO2e—2573514894181,515
——————R——————
—0.010.03<0.0050.010.05N2O—0.000.000.000.000.00
—0.311.160.100.361.94CH4—7.3510.014.011.943.3
—10.839.93.3812.666.6CO2T—73.6100140120433
—7.7528.62.439.0047.8NBCO2—0.000.000.000.000.00
—3.0511.30.963.5518.8BCO2—73.6100140120433
——————PM2.5T——————
——————PM2.5D——————
16 /34
——————PM2.5E——————
——————PM10T——————
——————PM10D——————
——————PM10E——————
——————SO2——————
——————CO——————
——————NOx——————
——————ROG——————
——————TOG——————
AnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotal
—2573514894181,515—42.658.180.969.3251CO2e
————————————R
—0.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00N2O
—7.3510.014.011.943.3—1.221.662.311.987.17CH4
—73.6100140120433—12.216.623.119.871.7CO2T
—0.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00NBCO2
—73.6100140120433—12.216.623.119.871.7BCO2
————————————PM2.5T
————————————PM2.5D
17 /34
————————————PM2.5E
————————————PM10T
————————————PM10D
————————————PM10E
————————————SO2
————————————CO
————————————NOx
————————————ROG
————————————TOG
Daily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalLandUse
—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.130.08
—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.810.490.612.063.97—0.130.08
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
18 /34
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
———————————————
Daily,Summer(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalDaily,Winter(Max)StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalAnnualStripMallGene
ralOfficeBuilding
0.100.340.66CO2e——————
0.100.340.66R——————
———N2O——————
———CH4——————
———CO2T——————
———NBCO2——————
———BCO2——————
———PM2.5T——————
———PM2.5D——————
19 /34
———PM2.5E——————
———PM10T——————
———PM10D——————
———PM10E——————
———SO2——————
———CO——————
———NOx——————
———ROG——————
———TOG——————
MedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseTotalEquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
20 /34
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
EquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalEquipmentTypeDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e——————CO2e——————
R——————R——————
N2O——————N2O——————
CH4——————CH4——————
CO2T——————CO2T——————
NBCO2——————NBCO2——————
BCO2——————BCO2——————
PM2.5T——————PM2.5T——————
PM2.5D——————PM2.5D——————
21 /34
PM2.5E——————PM2.5E——————
PM10T——————PM10T——————
PM10D——————PM10D——————
PM10E——————PM10E——————
SO2——————SO2——————
CO——————CO——————
NOx——————NOx——————
ROG——————ROG——————
TOG——————TOG——————
VegetationDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotalLandUseDaily,Summer(Max)TotalDaily,Winter(Max)TotalAnnualTotal
CO2e———————————————————
R———————————————————
N2O———————————————————
CH4———————————————————
CO2T———————————————————
NBCO2———————————————————
BCO2———————————————————
PM2.5T———————————————————
PM2.5D———————————————————
22 /34
PM2.5E———————————————————
PM10T———————————————————
PM10D———————————————————
PM10E———————————————————
SO2———————————————————
CO———————————————————
NOx———————————————————
ROG———————————————————
TOG———————————————————
SpeciesDaily,Summer(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—Daily,Winter(Max)AvoidedSubtotalSequesteredSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—AnnualAvoidedSubtotal
—————
—————
VMT/Year21,058,5325,886,0402,518,0535,817,883
—————
—————
VMT/Sunday29,0451,53137312,606
—————
—————
VMT/Saturday59,7684,8342,24915,134
—————
—————
VMT/Weekday63,01021,3049,13416,767
—————
Unmitigated(number)—00
23 /34
—————
Trips/Year1,925,589538,219230,250566,271
—————
—————
Trips/Sunday2,65614034.11,227
—————
—————
Trips/Saturday5,4654422061,473
—————
—————
Trips/Weekday5,7621,9488351,632
—————
—————
SequestSubtotalRemovedSubtotal—LandUseTypeStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseHearthTypeApartmentsMidRiseWoodFireplacesGasFireplaces
5.ActivityData
NaturalGas(kBTU/yr)778,3035,069,293608,3153,332,053
ParkingAreaCoated(sqft)—
Value0.00250N2O0.00400.00400.00400.0040
Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)177,000
0000000CH40.03300.03300.03300.0330
24 /34
Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)531,000
Unitday/yrday/yrCO2261261261261
ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated(sqft)194,400
Electricity(kWh/yr)1,276,7783,564,057427,6871,099,750
PropaneFireplacesElectricFireplacesNoFireplacesConventionalWoodStovesCatalyticWoodStovesNon-CatalyticWoodStovesPelletWoodStovesResidentialInteriorAreaCoated(sqft)583200SeasonSnowDaysSummerDaysLandUse
StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRise
TimesServiced18.01.00
ServiceLeakRate4.000.00
OutdoorWater(gal/year)0.000.000.000.00Cogeneration(kWh/year)————
OperationsLeakRate4.001.00
Quantity(kg)<0.0050.04
25 /34
GWP2,0881,430
IndoorWater(gal/year)9,629,42835,546,7503,011,53311,182,140Waste(ton/year)137186259222
RefrigerantR-410AR-134a
EquipmentTypeOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsStand-aloneretailrefrigeratorsandfreezers
LandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseLandUseStripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseLandUseTypeStripMallStripMall
20.01.0018.01.0018.010.01.00
LoadFactorLoadFactor
AnnualHeatInput(MMBtu/yr)
7.500.004.000.004.002.500.00
HorsepowerHorsepower
DailyHeatInput(MMBtu/day)
7.500.604.000.604.002.500.60
HoursPerDayHoursperYear
<0.0050.02<0.0050.45<0.005<0.0050.12BoilerRating(MMBtu/hr)
26 /34
NumberperDayHoursperDay
3,9221,4302,0881,4302,0882,0881,430
Number
EngineTierNumberperDay
R-404AR-134aR-410AR-134aR-410AR-410AR-134a
FuelType
FuelTypeFuelType
Walk-inrefrigeratorsandfreezersHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezersOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezersOthercommercialA/CandheatpumpsAverageroomA/C&OtherresidentialA/Can
dheatpumpsHouseholdrefrigeratorsand/orfreezers
StripMallGeneralOfficeBuildingGeneralOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingMedicalOfficeBuildingApartmentsMidRiseApartmentsMidRiseEquipmentTypeEquipmentTypeEquipmentType
FinalAcresNaturalGasSaved(btu/year)
FinalAcresUnitannualdaysofextremeheat
FuelTypeInitialAcresElectricitySaved(kWh/year)
27 /34
InitialAcresResultforProjectLocation0.00
VegetationSoilTypeNumber
EquipmentTypeVegetationLandUseTypeBiomassCoverTypeTreeTypeClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeat
6.ClimateRiskDetailedReport Cal-Adaptmidcentury2040–2059averageprojectionsforfourhazardsarereportedbelowforyourprojectlocation.TheseareunderRepresentationConcentrationPathway(RCP)8.5whichassumesGHGem
issionswillcontinuetorisestronglythrough2050andthenplateauaround2100.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
annualdayswithprecipitationabove20mmmetersofinundationdepthannualhectaresburned
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
28 /34
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
0.000.000.00
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradation
TemperatureandExtremeHeatdataareforgridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Theprojectionisbasedonthe98thhistoricalpercentileofdailymaximum/minimumtemperaturesfromobservedhistoricaldata(32climatemodelens
emblefromCal-Adapt,2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5). Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.ExtremePrecipitationdataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Thethresholdof20mmisequ
ivalenttoabout¾aninchofrain,whichwouldbelighttomoderaterainfallifreceivedoverafulldayorheavyrainifreceivedoveraperiodof2to4hours.Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.SeaLevelRised
ataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromRadkeetal.(2017),asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderdifferentincrementsofsealevelrisecoupledwithextrem
estormevents.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialinundationdepthforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier
(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis50meters(m)by50m,orabout164feet(ft)by164ft.Wildfiredataarefor
thegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromUCDavis,asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040–2059averageunderRCP8.5),andconsiderhistoricaldataofclimate,vegetation,populationdensity,andlarge(>400ha
)firehistory.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentialwildfireprobabilitiesforthegridcell.Thefoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer
/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-CM5),Averageconditions(CanESM2),Rangeofdifferentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities(MIROC5).Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.Thesensitivi
tyscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectrefer
stoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalcu
latedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresdonotincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.
VulnerabilityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
AdaptiveCapacityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ResultforProjectCensusTract—32.172.095.68.9548.90.00
29 /34
SensitivityScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ExposureScoreN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationSeaLevelRiseWildfireFloodingDroughtSnowpackReductionAirQualityDegradationIndicatorExposureIndicatorsAQ-OzoneAQ-PMAQ-DPMDrinkingWaterLeadRiskH
ousingPesticides
Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofa
projectreferstoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisratedonascaleof1to5,withascoreof5representingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilitysc
oresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresincludeimplementationofclimateriskreductionmeasures.7.HealthandEquityDetails ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscor
eis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
89.962.7—58.669.298.758.739.0—12.822.019.6—6.5233.24.5923.758.4ResultforProjectCensusTract—82.856409692.634415571.46156807—
30 /34
ToxicReleasesTrafficEffectIndicatorsCleanUpSitesGroundwaterHazWasteFacilities/GeneratorsImpairedWaterBodiesSolidWasteSensitivePopulationAsthmaCardio-vascularLowBirthWeightsSocioeconomicFactorIndicato
rsEducationHousingLinguisticPovertyUnemploymentIndicatorEconomicAbovePovertyEmployedMedianHIEducation
ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.
79.8280508110035.76286411—74.5797510669.25445913—91.0817400257.05119979—23.3286282681.3550622445.617862182.3995893754.632362376—17.6825356176.697035878.7373283795.3933016859.34813294—73.784165280.084
.50.00.0
31 /34
Bachelor'sorhigherHighschoolenrollmentPreschoolenrollmentTransportationAutoAccessActivecommutingSocial2-parenthouseholdsVotingNeighborhoodAlcoholavailabilityParkaccessRetaildensitySupermarketaccessTr
eecanopyHousingHomeownershipHousinghabitabilityLow-inchomeownerseverehousingcostburdenLow-increnterseverehousingcostburdenUncrowdedhousingHealthOutcomesInsuredadultsArthritisAsthmaERAdmissionsHighBlo
odPressureCancer(excludingskin)
0.00.00.00.068.887.280.265.40.00.00.019.60.00.0—0.00.00.0—0.00.031.069.378.414.477.2—
32 /34
AsthmaCoronaryHeartDiseaseChronicObstructivePulmonaryDiseaseDiagnosedDiabetesLifeExpectancyatBirthCognitivelyDisabledPhysically DisabledHeartAttackERAdmissionsMentalHealthNotGoodChronicKidneyDiseaseO
besityPedestrianInjuriesPhysicalHealthNotGoodStrokeHealthRiskBehaviorsBingeDrinkingCurrentSmokerNoLeisureTimeforPhysicalActivityClimateChangeExposuresWildfireRiskSLRInundationAreaChildrenElderlyEngli
shSpeakingForeign-bornOutdoorWorkersClimateChangeAdaptiveCapacity
19.243.523.0—11.3—48.5ResultforProjectCensusTract26.079.0NoNoNoJustification
33 /34
ImperviousSurfaceCoverTrafficDensityTrafficAccessOtherIndicesHardshipOtherDecisionSupport2016VotingMetricCalEnviroScreen4.0ScoreforProjectLocation(a)HealthyPlacesIndexScoreforProjectLocation(b)Projec
tLocatedinaDesignatedDisadvantagedCommunity(SenateBill535)ProjectLocatedinaLow-IncomeCommunity(AssemblyBill1550)ProjectLocatedinaCommunityAirProtectionProgramCommunity(AssemblyBill617)Screen
a:ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.b:ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore(i.e.,greater
than50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensustractsinthestate.NoHealth&EquityMeasuresselected.Health&EquityEvaluationScorecardnotcompleted.NoHealth&EquityCustomMeasurescreated.8.Us
erChangestoDefaultData
SeeNoteA.3
34 /34
Operations:Hearths
Downtown Specific Plan Update
CalEEMod Notes
Note A.1 /ƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷźƚƓ ƦŷğƭĻƭ ǞĻƩĻ ƒƚķźŅźĻķ Ʒƚ ƩĻƦƩĻƭĻƓƷ ğ ƭĭĻƓğƩźƚ źƓ Ǟŷźĭŷ ĭƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷźƚƓ ƦŷğƭĻƭ ŅƚƩ
ƷŷĻ ŭźǝĻƓ ƌğƓķ ǒƭĻƭ ƚĭĭǒƩ ƭźƒǒƌƷğƓĻƚǒƭƌǤ͵ ŷĻ ķĻƒƚƌźƷźƚƓͲ ŭƩğķźƓŭͲ ğƓķ ğƩĭŷźƷĻĭƷǒƩğƌ ĭƚğƷźƓŭƭ
ƦŷğƭĻƭ ǞĻƩĻ ĻǣƷĻƓķĻķ Ʒƚ ƚƓĻ ƒƚƓƷŷ Ʒƚ ƒƚƩĻ ƩĻğƌźƭƷźĭğƌƌǤ ƩĻŅƌĻĭƷ ƷŷĻ ƌĻǝĻƌƭ ƚŅ ķĻƒƚƌźƷźƚƓͲ
ŭƩğķźƓŭͲ ğƓķ ĭƚğƷźƓŭƭ ƷŷğƷ Ǟƚǒƌķ ĬĻ ƩĻƨǒźƩĻķ ŅƚƩ ĭƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷźƚƓ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ŭźǝĻƓ ƌğƓķ ǒƭĻƭͲ ĬğƭĻķ
ƚƓ ƷŷĻ ĭƚƓƭǒƌƷğƓƷƭ ĻǣƦĻƩźĻƓĭĻ͵
Note A.2 Iğǒƌ ƷƩźƦ ƌĻƓŭƷŷƭ ǞĻƩĻ ĭƚƓƭĻƩǝğƷźǝĻƌǤ źƓĭƩĻğƭĻķ Ʒƚ ЍЉ ƒźƌĻƭ ΛƚƓĻ ǞğǤΜ Ʒƚ ƩĻŅƌĻĭƷ ğ ƩğƓŭĻ ƚŅ
ƦƚƭƭźĬƌĻ ƌğƓķŅźƌƌƭ ƚƩ ƩĻĭĻźǝźƓŭ ƌƚĭğƷźƚƓƭͲ ğƭ ƷŷĻǤ ğƩĻ ƓƚƷ ƉƓƚǞƓ ğƷ Ʒŷźƭ ƷźƒĻ͵
Note A.3 wĻƭźķĻƓƷźğƌ ƌğƓķ ǒƭĻƭ Ǟƚǒƌķ ƓƚƷ ĭƚƓƷğźƓ ŷĻğƩƷŷƭ ƚƩ ǞƚƚķƭƷƚǝĻƭ͵
APPENDIX G: NOISE STUDY
NoiseStudy
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan
UpdateProject
September 13, 2023
Noise Study
1. Introduction
This chapter describes the existing noise environment in the planning area, anticipated changes
in the noise environment resulting from implementation of the El Segundo Downtown Specific
Plan Update Project (Project), and related impacts and mitigation needs.
2. Project Description
revise
the existing Specific Plan planning districts, amend General Plan and zoning designations on
eight parcels, and include mobility enhancements. The Project would include public improvements
and streetscape guidelines, private urban form criteria, permitted land uses, development
standards, mobility and infrastructure improvements, an implementation plan, and administration
processes. The Project would allow for increases of up to 130,000 square feet of retail and
restaurant uses, 200,000 square feet of office uses, 24,000 square feet of medical office uses,
and 300 residential uses. Mobility enhancements would include expanding pedestrian areas along
portions of Main Street, Richmond Street, and Grand Avenue, which could affect the number of
travel lanes on those streets. The Project would potentially relocate a portion of an existing truck
route that is located on Main Street. It proposes the potential permanent closure of a portion of
Richmond Street to vehicles, and a variety of other minor pedestrian and transit improvements
(e.g., widened sidewalks, expanded outdoor seating and dining areas, bus stop enhancements,
etc.). The Project would also include modifications to parking standards and strategies, as well
as alternatives for on-street parking. Relatedly, the Project may potentially involve the
construction of two new parking structures at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Standard
Street and the northeast corner of Richmond Street and Franklin Avenue.
3. Environmental Setting
3.1 Fundamentals of Sound and Environmental Noise
Sound can be described in terms of its loudness (amplitude) and frequency (pitch). The standard
unit of measurement for sound is the decibel, abbreviated dB. Because the human ear is not
equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies, the A-weighted scale (dBA) is used to reflect the
normal hearing sensitivity range of the human ear. Table 1 provides examples of A-weighted
noise levels from common sources. Although the terms and are often used
synonymously, noise is commonly defined as sound that is either loud, unpleasant, unexpected,
1
or undesired. Because decibels are logarithmic units, they cannot be simply added or subtracted.
For example, two cars each producing 60 dBA of noise would not produce a combined 120 dBA.
1
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic
Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
Table 1
Typical Noise Levels
Common Outdoor Activities Noise Level (dBA) Common Indoor Activities
-110- Rock band
Jet flyover at 1,000 feet
-100-
Gas lawnmower at 3 feet
-90-
Diesel truck at 50 feet at 50 mph Food blender at 3 feet
-80- Garbage disposal at 3 feet
Noise urban area, daytime
Gas lawnmower at 100 feet -70- Vacuum cleaner at 10 feet
Commercial area Normal speech at 3 feet
Heavy traffic at 300 feet -60-
Large business office
Quiet urban daytime -50- Dishwasher in next room
Quiet urban nighttime -40- Theater, large conference room
Quiet suburban nighttime
-30- Library
Quiet rural nighttime Bedroom at night, concert hall
-20-
Broadcast/recording studio
-10-
Lowest threshold of human hearing -0- Lowest threshold of human hearing
Note: These noise levels are approximations intended for general reference and informational use.
They do not meet the standard required for detailed noise analysis but are provided for the reader to
gain a rudimentary concept of various noise levels.
Source: Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (Figure 15-1),
September 2013.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
3.1.1 Noise Definitions
This noise analysis discusses sound levels in terms of equivalent noise level (L), maximum
eq
noise level (L), minimum noise level (L), and Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL).
maxmix
Statistical descriptors (L) are also discussed.
x
Equivalent Noise Level (L)
eq
L represents the equivalent steady-state noise level for a stated period of time that would contain
eq
the same acoustic energy as the fluctuating, time-varying noise level of that same period. For
example, the L for one hour is the energy average noise level for that hour. L can be thought
eqeq
of as a continuous noise level for a certain period that is equivalent in acoustic energy content to
a fluctuating noise level of that same period. In this report L is expressed in units of dBA.
eq
Maximum Noise Level (L)
max
L represents the highest instantaneous noise level of a specified time period.
max
Minimum Noise Level (L)
mix
L represents the lowest instantaneous noise level of a specified time period.
min
Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL)
CNEL is a weighted noise measurement scale of average sound level during a 24-hour period.
Due to increased noise sensitivities during evening and night hours, human reaction to sound
between 7:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. is as if it were actually 5 dBA higher than had it occurred
between 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. From 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M., humans perceive sound as if it
were 10 dBA higher. To account for these sensitivities, CNEL penalizes evening noise levels
between 7:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. by an additional 5 dBA and nighttime noise levels between
10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. by an additional 10 dBA. Because of this, 24-hour CNEL figures are
always higher than their corresponding 24-hour L.
eq
Statistical Descriptor (L)
x
L is used to represent the noise level exceeded X% of a specified time period. For example, L
x90
represents the noise level that is exceeded 90% of a specified time period. L is commonly used
90
2
to represent ambient or background steady-state noise levels.
3.1.2 Effects of Environmental Noise
The degree to which noise can impact an environment ranges from levels that interfere with
speech and sleep to levels that can cause adverse health effects. Most human response to noise
is subjective. Factors that influence individual responses may include the intensity, frequency,
and pattern of noise; the amount of background or existing noise present; and the nature of work
or human activity that is exposed to intruding noise.
According to the National Institute of Health (NIH), extended or repeated exposure to sounds at
or above 85 dB can cause hearing loss. Sounds of 75 dBA or less, even after continuous and
3
repeated exposure, are unlikely to cause hearing loss. The World Health Organization (WHO)
2
Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013.
3
National Institute of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication.
www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/noise-induced-hearing-loss.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
4
For children, this limit is 120 dB.
Exposure to elevated nighttime noise levels can disrupt sleep, leading to increased levels of
fatigue and decreased work or school performance. For the preservation of healthy sleeping
environments, the WHO recommends that continuous interior noise levels should not exceed 30
5
dBA L and that individual noise events of 45 dBA or higher be limited.
eq
Some epidemiological studies have shown a weak association between long-term exposure to
noise levels of 65 to 70 dBA L or greater and cardiovascular effects, including ischaemic heart
eq
disease and hypertension. However, at this time, the relationship is largely inconclusive.
It is generally accepted that people with normal hearing sensitivity can barely perceive a 3 dBA
change in noise levels, though if changes occur to the character of a sound (i.e., changes to the
6
frequency content), then changes less than 3 dBA may be more noticeable. Changes of 5 dBA
7
may be readily perceptible, and changes of 10 dBA are perceived as a doubling in loudness.
8
However, few people are highly annoyed by daytime noise levels below 55 dBA.
effectively communicate via speech, as well as other activities, resulting in annoyance or
inconvenience. Other common daily activities that may be disrupted by elevated interior noise
levels include watching television, listening to music, or activities requiring concentration (such as
reading). The EPA has found that a home interior noise level of 45 dBA L generally protects
eq
9
speech and communication by providing 100% intelligibility of speech sounds. The EPA has
determined that, given the preservation of an indoor noise level associated with 100% speech
intelligibility (i.e., 45 dBA L)
eq
ts and
-
3.1.3 Noise Attenuation
Generally speaking, noise levels decrease, or as distances from noise sources to
receivers increases. For each doubling of distance, noise from stationary or small, localized
may attenuate at a rate of 6 dBA for each
doubling of distance. This attenuation is referred to as the inverse square law. For example, if a
point source emits a noise level of 80 dBA at a reference distance of 50 feet its noise level would
be approximately 74 dBA at a distance of 100 feet, 68 dBA at a distance of 200 feet, etc. Noise
emitted by , such as highways, attenuates at the rate of 3 dBA for each doubling of
10
distance.
4
World Health Organization, Guidelines for Community Noise, 1999.
5
World Health Organization, Guidelines for Community Noise, 1999.
6
Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013.
7
Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013.
8
World Health Organization, Guidelines for Community Noise, 1999.
9
EPA, Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and
Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety, 1974.
10
Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, April 2020.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
Factors such as ground absorption and atmospheric effects may also affect the propagation of
noise. In particular, ground attenuation by non-reflective surfaces such as soft dirt or grass may
contribute to increased attenuation rates of up to an additional 8-10 dBA per doubling of
11
distance.
Noise is most audible when traveling by direct line of sight, an unobstructed visual path between
a noise source and a receiver. Barriers that break the line of sight between noise sources and
receivers, such as walls and buildings, can greatly reduce source noise levels by allowing noise
to reach receivers by diffraction only. Barriers can reduce source noise levels by up to 20 dBA,
though it is generally infeasible for temporary barriers to reduce source noise levels by more than
12
15 dBA. In cases where the noise path from source to receiver is direct but grazes the top of a
13
barrier, noise attenuation of up to 5 dBA may still occur.
3.2 Fundamentals of Vibration
Vibration is an oscillatory motion that can be described in terms of displacement, velocity, and
14
acceleration. Unlike noise, vibration is not a common environmental issue, as it is unusual for
vibration from vehicle sources to be perceptible. Common sources of vibration may include trains,
construction activities, and some industrial operations.
3.2.1 Vibration Definitions
This analysis discusses vibration in terms of Peak Particle Velocity (PPV):
Peak Particle Velocity (PPV)
PPV is commonly used to describe and quantify vibration impacts to buildings and other
structures. PPV levels represent the maximum instantaneous peak of a vibration signal and are
15
generally measured in inches per second (in/sec).
3.2.2 Effects of Vibration
High levels of vibration may cause damage to buildings or even physical personal injury. However,
vibration levels rarely affect human health outside the personal operation of certain construction
equipment or industrial tools. Instead, most people consider environmental vibration to be an
annoyance that may affect concentration or disturb sleep. Background vibration in residential
areas is usually not perceptible, and perceptible indoor vibrations are generally caused by sources
within buildings themselves, such as slamming doors or heavy footsteps. Vibration from traffic on
16
smooth roadways is rarely perceptible, even from larger vehicles such as buses or trucks. The
17
threshold of human perception of vibration is approximately 0.01-0.02 in/sec PPV.
11
Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, April 2020.
12
Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, April 2020.
13
Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, April 2020.
14
Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, September 2018.
15
Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, September 2018.
16
Caltrans, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, April 2020.
17
Caltrans, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, April 2020.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
3.3 Regulatory Framework
3.3.1 Federal
Currently, no federal noise standards regulate environmental noise and vibration associated with
temporary construction activities or the long-term operations of development projects. As such,
temporary and long-term noise and vibration impacts resultant from the Project would be largely
regulated or otherwise evaluated by State and City of El Segundo standards designed to protect
public well-being and health.
3.3.2 State
3.3.2.1 2017 General Plan Guidelines
propose county and city standards for
acceptable exterior noise levels based on land use. These standards are incorporated into land
use planning processes to prevent or reduce noise and land use incompatibilities. The State
suggested compatibility considerations between various land uses and exterior noise levels are
not regulatory in nature, but are recommendations intended to aid communities in determining
their own noise-acceptability standards.
3.3.2.2 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
To aid in the evaluation of groundborne vibration impacts, Caltrans guidelines and
recommendations are used given the absence of applicable quantitative City standards.
Though not regulatory in nature, Caltrans has established vibration impact criteria for buildings
and human responses (i.e., annoyance). Table 3
Table 4
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
Table 3
Caltrans Guideline Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria
Maximum PPV (in/sec)
Continuous/
Structure and Condition
Frequent/
Transient Sources
Intermittent
Sources
Extremely fragile historic buildings, ruins, ancient
0.12 0.08
monuments
Fragile buildings 0.2 0.1
Historic and some old buildings 0.5 0.25
Older residential structures 0.5 0.3
New residential structures 1.0 0.5
Modern industrial/commercial buildings 2.0 0.5
Note: Transient sources create a single isolated vibration event, such as blasting or drop balls.
Continuous/frequent/intermittent sources include impact pile drivers, pogo-stick compactors, crack-and-
seat equipment, vibratory pile drivers, and vibratory compaction equipment.
Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, September
2018.
Table 4
Caltrans Guideline Vibration Annoyance Potential Criteria
Maximum PPV (in/sec)
Continuous/
Human Response
Frequent/
Transient Sources
Intermittent
Sources
Barely perceptible 0.04 0.01
Distinctly perceptible 0.25 0.04
Strongly perceptible 0.9 0.10
Severe 2.0 0.4
Note: Transient sources create a single isolated vibration event, such as blasting or drop balls.
Continuous/frequent/intermittent sources include impact pile drivers, pogo-stick compactors, crack-and-
seat equipment, vibratory pile drivers, and vibratory compaction equipment.
Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, September
2018.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
3.3.3 City of El Segundo
3.3.3.1 El Segundo General Plan Noise Element
intended to be used as a guide in public and private
18
development matters related to outdoor noise. The Noise Element contains the following goals,
objectives, policies, and programs designed to minimized existing and foreseeable noise impacts
in the City:
Goal N1: Provision of a Noise-Safe Environment
Encourage a high quality environment within all parts of the City of El
adversely affected by excessive noise.
Objective N1-1: It is the objective of the City of El Segundo to ensure that City residents are
not exposed to mobile noise levels in excess of the interior and exterior
noise standards or the single event noise standards specified in the El
Segundo Municipal Code.
Policy N1-1.1: Continue to work for the elimination of adverse noise sources, especially
from Los Angeles International Airport West Imperial Terminal, and from
helicopter and aircraft flyovers.
Program N1-1.1A: The City shall implement the Airport Abatement
Policy and Program (City Council Resolution No.
3691, adopted May 21, 1991, or any future revisions
thereto) in its efforts to minimize noise impacts
caused by LAX.
Policy N1-1.2: Play an active role in the planning process associated with preparation of
the Los Angeles International Airport Master Plan.
Program N1-1.2A: Encourage the City of Los Angeles Department of
Airports to adopt and maintain a passenger service
level goal and implementation program which will
minimize the noise impacts to the City of El
Segundo.
Policy N1-1.3: Continue to work with the City of Los Angeles Department of Airports to
reduce the noise-impacted area around Los Angeles International Airport
to zero.
Program N1-1.3A: Where feasible, the City should use noise barriers to
mitigate noise problems that cannot be reduced at
their source. Sound walls, berms, and dense
18
City of El Segundo, General Plan Noise Element, 1992.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
landscaping shall be used to reduce exterior noise
Program N1-1.3B: Encourage the City of Los Angeles Department of
Airports to pay the additional costs for new
residential construction to provide acoustical
treatment to mitigate noise impacts to a level that
meets land use compatibility standards.
Policy N1-1.4: Consider noise impacts from traffic arterials and railroads, as well as
aircraft, when identifying potential new areas for residential land use.
Program N1-1.4A: All plans submitted for development review shall
noise contours for LAX and citywide noise contours.
Policy N1-1.5: Encourage state inspection and enforcement of noise standards for motor
vehicles, including those involved in public transit.
Program N1-1.5A: To the degree feasible, monitor noise levels along
Sepulveda Boulevard (State Route 1) and, if
warranted, work with the state to ensure inspection
and enforcement of noise standards for motor
vehicles, including public transit.
Policy N1-1.6: Encourage the State Department of Transportation (DOT) to conduct an
active highway noise abatement program with scenic/aesthetic
consideration for Sepulveda Boulevard (State Route 1).
Program N1-1.6A: To the degree feasible, the City shall participate with
DOT in the development of a highway noise
abatement program for Sepulveda Boulevard (State
Route 1).
Policy N1-1.7: Monitor California Department of Transportation and Los Angeles County
Transportation Commission noise abatement measures aimed at
minimizing noise impacts associated with the I-105 Freeway and the Metro
Rail Green Line \[now the C Line\].
Program N1-1.7A: Existing and projected noise environments shall be
evaluated when considering alterations to the City
circulation system.
Program N1-1.7B: Where feasible, the City shall provide adequate
setbacks or require noise abatement barriers along
the I-105 Freeway in order to protect new
development from noise levels above exterior
standards.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
Program N1-1.7C: All new roadways shall incorporate the following
noise mitigation measures into their design:
alignment, barriers, vertical profile, and lateral
separation.
Policy N1-1.8: Continue to develop zoning, subdivision, and development controls to
prevent future encroachment of noise-sensitive uses into present or
planned industrial or transportation system noise-impacted zones where
adverse effects cannot be adequately mitigated.
Policy N1-1.9: Require review of all new development projects in the City for conformance
with California Airport Noise Regulations and California Noise Insulation
Standards (CCR Title 24) to ensure interior noise will not exceed
acceptable levels.
Program N1-1.9A: All new habitable residential construction in areas of
the City with an annual CNEL of 60 dBA or higher
shall include all mitigation measures necessary to
reduce interior noise levels to minimum state
standards. Post construction acoustical analysis
shall be performed to demonstrate compliance.
Policy N1-1.10: Continue to develop and implement City programs to incorporate noise
reduction measures into existing residential development where interior
noise levels exceed acceptable standards.
Objective N1-2: It is the objective of the City of El Segundo to ensure that City residents are
Ordinance standards.
Policy N1-2.1:
a condition of building permit approval.
Program N1-2.1A: Address noise impacts in all environmental
documents for discretionary approval projects, to
ensure that noise sources meet City Noise
Ordinance standards. These sources may include:
mechanical or electrical equipment, truck loading
areas, or outdoor speaker systems.
Program N1-2.1B: The City shall establish criteria for determining the
type and size of projects that should submit a
construction-related noise mitigation plan. Noise
mitigation plans shall be submitted to the City
Engineer for his review and approval prior to
issuance of a grading permit. The plan must display
the location of construction equipment and how this
noise will be mitigated. These mitigation measures
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
may involve noise suppression equipment and/or
the use of temporary barriers.
Program N1-2.1C: The City shall strictly enforce the El Segundo
-dependent noise standards
for stationary sources. Two of the major sources
which shall be closely monitored are industrial
facilities and construction activities.
Objective N1-3: It is the objective of the City of El Segundo that the City maintain
intergovernmental coordination and public information programs which are
highly efficient in their noise abatement efforts.
Policy N1-3.1: Encourage site planning to be consistent with the existing and future noise
environment and promote development standards in which noise-sensitive
projects and residences are mitigated from major noise sources. Short-
term and long-term noise control measures should be formulated in a
manner compatible with community needs and expectations.
Program N1-3.1A: Noise regulations and standards shall be developed
or updated in conformance with the findings of the
General Plan.
Program N1-3.1AB: The City shall conduct an educational campaign to
inform the public of the consequences of noise and
the actions each person can take to help reduce
noise. The City shall provide, if appropriate,
educational material, group presentations, news
releases, studies, and reports to raise public
awareness of the adverse effects of noise.
Policy N1-3.2: Work to remove non-conforming land uses (mixed usage such as
residential uses in commercial or industrial land use designations) which
result in noise incompatibility.
Program N1-3.2A: The City shall develop strategies for the orderly
implementation of mitigation measures for present
noise-impacted areas, such as residential uses
adjacent to the industrial uses.
Policy N1-3.3: Employ effective noise mitigation techniques through appropriate
provisions in the building code, subdivision procedures, and zoning and
noise ordinances.
Program N1-3.3A: The City shall review and, if necessary, revise the
City Noise Ordinance to ensure that proper
regulations are being enforced to protect City
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
residents from excessive noise levels from
stationary noise sources.
Program N1-3.3B: Noise-related zoning regulations shall be revised to
be consistent with the Noise Element.
Program N1-3.3C: When appropriate, the City shall allocate noise
impact mitigation costs to the agency or party
responsible for the noise incompatibility.
Program N1-3.3D: The City shall use police power to vigorously enforce
existing laws relative to noise.
Policy N1-3.4: Urge continued federal and state research into noise problems and
recommend additional research programs as problems are identified.
Program N1-3.4A: The City shall apply for the technical, procedural,
and funding assistance available at the state and
federal level for noise reduction measures.
Policy N1-3.5: Support a continuous effort to evaluate noise levels in the City of El
Segundo and to reduce unacceptable noise levels through the planning
process.
Program N1-3.5A: The City shall join adjacent jurisdictions (e.g., City of
Los Angeles, City of Hawthorne, City of Manhattan
Beach) and other agencies involved in noise
mitigation in a cooperative effort to lessen adverse
impacts and reduce noise incompatibilities across
city boundaries.
The Noise Element references interior and exterior noise standards contained in the El Segundo
regulations. The Noise Element was adopted in 1992, and the El Segundo Municipal Code has
regulations are identified and discussed in the following section.
3.3.3.2 City of El Segundo Municipal Code
The El Segundo Municipal Code establishes a number of regulations for the control of noise and
vibration. Title 7, Nuisances and Offenses, Chapter 2, Noise and Vibration, establishes the
following standards that are relevant to the Project and the evaluation of its noise and vibration
impacts:
Section 7-2-4: Noise Standards. No person shall, at any location within the City, create
any noise, nor shall any person allow the creation of any noise within the
which causes the noise level when measured on any other property
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
except as set forth in subsection C1 of this section.
A. Residential Property: Five (5 dBA) above the ambient noise level.
B. Commercial and Industrial Property: Eight (8) dBA above the ambient
noise level.
C. Adjustments:
1. Increases to the noise standards as set forth in subsections
A and B of this Section may be permitted in accordance with
the following \[see Table 5\]:
Table 5
Section 7-2-4 (C)(1): Noise Standard Adjustments
Duration of Increase
Permitted Increase
(cumulative minutes per
(dBA)
hour)
0 30
5 15
10 5
15 1
20 Less than 1
Source: El Segundo Municipal Code, Section 7-2-4(C)(1).
2. If the receptor property is located on a boundary between
two (2) difference noise zones, the lower noise level
standard applicable to the quieter zone shall apply.
Section 7-2-6: Loud, Unusual and Unnecessary Noises Prohibited. Consistent with
other provisions of this Chapter, and in addition thereto, it shall be unlawful
for any person to willfully make, produce, suffer or allow to be produced by
human voice, machine, animal, or device, or any combination of same, any
loud, unusual, or unnecessary noise which disturbs the peace, quiet, and
comfort of any neighborhood, or which causes discomfort or annoyance to
any reasonable person of normal sensitivity in the area.
Section 7-2-7: Standards; Criteria. The standards which shall be considered in
determining whether a violation of the provisions of Section 7-2-6 of this
Chapter exists shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following criteria:
A. The frequency of the noise;
B. The intensity of the noise;
C. Whether the nature of the noise is usual or unusual;
D. The ambient noise level;
E. The proximity of the noise to residential sleeping facilities;
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
F. The nature and zoning of the area within which the noise
emanates;
G. The density of the inhabitation of the area within which the noise
emanates;
H. The time of the day or night the noise occurs;
I. The duration of the noise;
J. Whether the noise is recurrent, intermittent or constant; and
K. Whether the noise is produced by a commercial or
noncommercial activity.
Section 7-2-8: Specific Prohibitions. The following acts, and the causing thereof, are
declared to be in violation of this Chapter if they occur in such a manner as
to disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of any reasonable person of normal
sensitivity residing in the area; and occur:
A. Between the Hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 P.M.:
1. Operating, playing or permitting the operation or playing
of any radio, television, phonograph, drum, musical
instrument, sound amplifier, or similar device which
produces, reproduces or amplifies sound.
2. Using or operating any loudspeaker, public address
system or similar device.
3. Loading, unloading, opening, closing or other handling
of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage
cans, or similar objects.
4. Repairing, building, rebuilding, adjusting or testing any
motor vehicle.
B. Between the Hours of 8:00 P.M. and 7:00 P.M.:
1. Refuse Collection Vehicles:
a. Collection of refuse with a collection vehicle in a
thereof;
b. Operation or permitting the operation of the
compacting mechanism of any motor vehicle
which compacts refuse in a residential area or
2. Loudspeakers/Public Address Systems: Using or
operating for any commercial purpose any loudspeaker,
public address system, or similar device on a public right
of way or public space.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
3. Powered Model: Operating or permitting the operation
of powered models.
Section 7-2-9: Vibration. Notwithstanding other sections of this Chapter, a person shall
not create, maintain or cause any ground vibration which is perceptible,
without the use of instruments, to any reasonable person of normal
sensitivity at any point on any affected property.
Section 7-2-10: Exemptions. The following activities shall be exempted from the provisions
of this Chapter.
A. School and Park Facilities: Authorized activities conducted on
public school grounds and City park facilities, associated with
normal operation of the facilities including, but not limited to,
school and public athletic and entertainment events.
B. Mechanical or Electronic Devices: Any mechanical or electronic
device, apparatus or equipment used, related to or connected
with emergency machinery, vehicle, work or warning alarm or
bell, provided the sounding of any bell or alarm on any building
or motor vehicle shall terminate its operation within fifteen (15)
minutes of its activation.
C. Public Speaking or Assemblies: Noncommercial public
speaking and public assembly activities conducted on any
public space or public right of way without the use of sound
amplification equipment.
D. Construction Noise: Noise sources associated with or vibration
created by construction, repair, or remodeling of any real
property, provided said activities do not take place between the
Monday through Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a
Federal holiday, and provided the noise level created by such
activities does not exceed the noise standard of sixty five (65)
dBA plus the limits specified in subsection 7-2-4(C) of this
Chapter as measured on the receptor residential property line
and provided any vibration created does not endanger the
public health, welfare and safety.
E. Real Property Maintenance: Noise sources associated with the
maintenance of real property, provided said activities take place
clock (8:00) P.M. on any day except Sunday, or between the
hours of
on Sunday.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
F. Activities Preempted by State or Federal Law: Any activity to the
extent regulation thereof has been preempted by State or
Federal law, including, but not limited to, aircraft, motor
vehicles, railroads and other interstate carriers.
Section 7-2-13: Immediate Threats to Health and Welfare.
A. Order Immediate Halt: The noise control officer may order an
immediate halt to any sound which exposes any person to
continuous sound levels in excess of those shown in Table A in
subsection D of this Section \[see Table 6\], or impulsive sounds
in excess of Table B in subsection D of this Section \[see Table
7\]. Within two (2) working days following issuance of such an
order, the noise control officer shall apply to the appropriate
court for an injunction to replace the order.
B. Exceptions to Issuance or Order: No order pursuant to
subsection A of this Section shall be issued if the only persons
exposed to sound levels in excess of those listed in Tables A
\[see Table 6\] and B \[Table 7\] of subsection D of this Section
are exposed as a result of:
1. Trespass;
2. Invitation upon private property by the person causing or
permitting the sound; or
3. Employment by the person or a contractor of the person
causing or permitting the sound.
C. Remedial Action: Any person subject to an order issued by the
Noise Control Officer pursuant to this section shall comply with
such order until:
1. The sound is brought into a compliance with the order,
as determined by the Noise Control Officer; or
2. A judicial order has superseded the Noise Control
Officer.
D. Prohibited Sound Level: The sound levels which pose an
immediate threat to health and welfare are:
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
Table 6
Section 7-2-13 (D): Continuous Sound Levels
Sound Level Limit (dBA) Duration
90 8 hours
95 4 hours
100 2 hours
105 1 hour
110 30 minutes
Note: Sound levels measured at 50 feet or 15 meters.
Source: El Segundo Municipal Code, Section 7-2-13(D) Table
A.
Table 7
Section 7-2-13 (D): Impulsive Sound Levels
Number of Repetitions Per
Sound Level Limit (dBA)
24-Hour Period
145 1
135 10
125 100
Note: Sound levels measured at 50 feet or 15 meters.
Source: El Segundo Municipal Code, Section 7-2-13(D) Table
B.
3.4 Existing Conditions
3.4.1 Plan Area
The Specific Plan area is located in Downtown El Segundo, in the northwest quadrant of the City,
which is approximately 20 miles southwest from downtown Los Angeles. Downtown El Segundo
is located southwest of the interchange of Interstate 405 Freeway (I-405) and State Route 90
(Imperial Highway), west of Pacific Coast Highway and north of El Segundo Boulevard. Interstate
105 Freeway (I-105) is north of the Specific Plan area, immediately north of Imperial Highway.
The Project area is approximately 43.8 acres in size. The Project area is irregular in shape with
portions extending to Eucalyptus Drive to the east, El Segundo Boulevard to the south, Concord
Street to the west, and Mariposa Avenue to the north. Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is
located approximately 3,000 feet north of the Specific Plan area.
3.4.2 Noise-Sensitive Receptors
Noise-sensitive receptors typically are considered to be residential uses, long-term care facilities,
hotels/motels, houses of worship, hospitals, libraries, schools, concert halls, and parks. The
Specific Plan area includes primarily a range of neighborhood service commercial uses, such as
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
retail, restaurants, offices, and banks, all of which would not be considered noise-sensitive.
However, there are also some noise-sensitive uses within the Specific Plan area, such as:
El Segundo United Methodist Church (540 Main Street)
Multi-family residential building (350 Richmond Street)
Residential uses along Richmond Street, near Grand Avenue
Old Town Music Hall (140 Richmond Street)
The land uses surrounding the Specific Plan area are generally residential in nature but contain
a variety of other uses, as well. Noise-sensitive uses that are adjacent or in close proximity to the
Specific Plan area include the following:
El Segundo Public Library (111 West Mariposa Avenue) directly north of the Specific
Plan area, across Mariposa Avenue.
Richmond Street Elementary School (615 Richmond Street) approximately 275 feet
northeast of the Specific Plan area.
Library Park directly north of the Specific Plan area, across Mariposa Avenue.
El Segundo High School (640 Main Street) directly north of the Specific Plan area, across
Mariposa Avenue.
El Segundo Performing Arts Center (640 Main Street) approximately 350 feet north of
the Specific Plan area.
El Segundo Pre-School (301 West Grand Avenue) directly west of the Specific Plan
area, across Concord Street.
Concord Hotel (221 Concord Street) approximately 70 feet west of the Specific Plan
area.
El Segundo Christian Church (223 West Franklin Avenue) directly west of the Specific
Plan area.
Residential land uses located along and west of Richmond Street the nearest residential
uses are directly north of the Specific Plan area, across Holly Avenue.
Residential land uses located along and east of Standard Street the nearest residential
uses are directly east of the Specific Plan area, across Standard Street.
Residential land uses located along and west of Concord Street the nearest residential
uses are directly west of the Specific Plan area, across Concord Street.
A map identifying the locations of sensitive receptors is included in the appendix to this report.
The Project would allow for the construction of up to 300 residential units, which could also be
noise-sensitive receptors to future development under the Project.
3.4.3 Existing Ambient Noise Conditions
noise as the major noise sources affecting the City and its inhabitants. The most recent quarterly
noise reports released by Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) show that CNEL values near the
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
19
Specific Plan area range between 62 and 64 dB CNEL. Given the size of the Specific Plan area
to assume that LAX-related noise levels in the Specific Plan area are approximately 60 dBA
CNEL. ,
not just LAX, range between 65 and 70 dBA CNEL.
On Thursday, September 7, 2023, noise measurements were obtained at multiple locations within
the Specific Plan area to aid in the characterization of daytime ambient noise conditions within
the Specific Plan area. The measured noise levels are shown in Table 8, below. Descriptions of
noise sources are also included for each noise measurement. The measured noise levels are
consistent with the determination that ambient noise levels in the Specific Plan area range
between 65 and 70 dBA CNEL. A map identifying the locations of noise measurements in included
in the appendix to this report.
Table 8
Existing Noise Levels
Sound Level
Noise Measurement Location Noise Sources / Notes
(dBA L)
eq
Traffic along Main Street and
1. Intersection of Main Street and Mariposa
Mariposa Avenue. Aircraft also 69.2
Avenue
contributed to noise levels.
Traffic along Main Street and Holly
Avenue. Aircraft also contributed to
noise levels. Amplified music from
2. Intersection of Main Street and Holly
surrounding commercial/retail uses 65.7
Avenue
was audible at times but did not
contribute substantially to noise
levels.
Traffic along Main Street and Grand
3. Intersection of Main Street and Grand Avenue. Aircraft noise was not
67.7
Avenue substantially audible over traffic
noises.
Traffic along Main Street and El
4. Intersection of Main Street and El Segundo Segundo Boulevard. Industrial noises
68.0
Boulevard from the nearby refinery were clearly
audible at all times.
Traffic along Grand Avenue and
5. Intersection of Grand Avenue and
Richmond Street. Some noise from 62.9
Richmond Street
outdoor dining patrons.
Source: NTEC, 2023.
19
Los Angeles World Airports Quarterly Noise Reports. https://www.lawa.org/lawa-
environment/noise-management/lawa-noise-management-lax/california-state-airport-noise-
standards-quarterly-reports-and-contour-maps. Accessed September 5, 2023.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
4. Project Impacts
4.1 Thresholds of Significance
The following thresholds are
4.1.1 State CEQA Guidelines: Appendix G
In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the Project would have a significant
impact related to noise if the Project would result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
4.1.2 Construction Noise Thresholds
Consistent with CEQA and Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, construction of the Project would
have a significant noise impact if:
Project construction would expose noise-sensitive receptors to noise levels in excess of
the standards established in the El Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-4 and Section
7-2-10(D).
Project construction would expose any person to noise levels in excess of the standards
established in the El Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-13.
El Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-10(D) establishes a noise standard of 65 dBA plus the
limits specified in Section 7-2-4 for construction activities that occur between 7:00 A.M. and 6:00
P.M. Monday through Saturday (except on Federal holidays). Table 9 shows the construction
noise limits established by this regulation.
Table 9
Section 7-2-4 and Section 7-2-10(D) Construction
Noise Limits
Permitted Construction
Minutes Per Hour
Noise Level (dBA)
Up to 65 60
65 70 30
70 75 15
75 80 5
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
80 85 1
Above 85 Less than 1
Source: Noise limits and allowable exceedances derived from
the 65 dBA noise limit established by El Segundo Municipal
Code Section 7-2-10(D) and the increases permitted under
Section 7-2-4.
Construction occurring outside these hours or on Sunday or Federal holidays would be subject to
the normal Section 7-2-4 noise standards, which are a 5 dBA over ambient increase plus the
adjustments shown in Table 5. From a CEQA standpoint, this regulatory framework adequately
assesses the potential for construction noise levels to significantly impact noise-sensitive
receptors within or surrounding the Specific Plan area. As discussed earlier, existing ambient
noise levels within the Specific Plan area are in excess of 65 dBA CNEL. Given these existing
conditions, daytime construction noise levels less than 65 dBA L would not constitute a
eq
substantial temporary increase in noise levels. Noise levels temporarily exceeding 65 dBA L
eq
within the permitted increases outlined by El Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-4 (shown in
Table 9) also would not constitute a substantial temporary increase in noise levels. For example,
noise levels up to 5 dBA greater than the base 65 dBA L limit would only be permitted to occur
eq
up to 30 minutes per hour. Construction activities occurring outside the hours established by
Section 7-2-10(D) (i.e., nighttime construction or construction occurring on Sunday or federal
holidays) would be subject to the more stringent Section 7-2-4 noise standards, which, as noted,
are a 5 dBA over ambient increase with limited adjustments.
El Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-13 establishes continuous and impulsive noise limits
applicable to all receptors. These limits are shown above in Table 6 and Table 7. These noise
posing a threat to health or welfare (i.e., noise levels capable of causing hearing loss).
The City has not adopted other construction-related noise
thresholds of significance for CEQA consideration.
4.1.3 Operational Noise Thresholds
Consistent with CEQA and Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, implementation of the Project
would have a significant noise impact if:
Project operations would generate noise levels in excess of the standards established in
the El Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-4.
Project operations would conflict with the specific prohibitions established in the El
Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-8.
Project operations would result in a 3 dBA CNEL or greater increase in ambient noise
levels.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
El Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-4 establishes a 5 dBA above ambient noise level
standard for residential property and an 8 dBA above ambient noise level standard for commercial
and industrial property. Increases beyond these standards are permitted on a limited basis
established by Section 7-2-4(C)(1).
El Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-8 includes prohibitions for specific sources such as
amplified sources, loading/unloading activities, refuse collection vehicles, etc. Section 7-2-8 does
not establish quantitative noise standards for sources, but it establishes allowable hours of use
and other operational conditions.
This analysis conservatively considers any 3 dBA CNEL increase in noise levels (a barely
perceptible difference) to constitute a potentially significant impact.
consideration.
4.1.4 Groundborne Vibration Threshold
Consistent with CEQA and Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, construction and implementation
of the Project would have a significant groundborne vibration impact if:
Project construction would generate groundborne vibration levels that endanger the public
health, welfare and safety, as established by El Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-
10(D).
Project operations would result in groundborne vibration that is perceptible without
instruments, as established by El Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-9.
El Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-10(D) prohibits construction-related groundborne
vibration levels that endanger the public health, welfare, and safety, but it does not provide
quantitative thresholds. Therefore, the criteria identified by Caltrans in its 2020 Transportation
and Construction Guidance Manual are utilized to assist
vibration impacts and their potential to exceed the Section 7-2-10(D) standards. These criteria
are shown and discussed earlier in Table 3.
El Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-9 prohibits groundborne vibration that is perceptible
without instruments. Similarly, the criteria identified by Caltrans in its 2020 Transportation and
Construction Guidance Manual are utilized to assist in the assess
groundborne vibration impacts and their potential to result in perceptible (by humans) vibration.
As shown and discussed earlier in Table 4, Caltrans identifies
threshold for sources that are continuous, frequent, or intermittent.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
5. Analysis of Project Impacts
5.1 Threshold a):
Would the project result in generation of a substantial
temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in
the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established
in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
5.1.1 Construction Noise Impact
5.1.1.1 Land Use Designation and Zoning
By amending the land use designation and zoning on eight parcels within the Specific Plan area,
the Downtown Specific Plan Update would facilitate construction of projects within the Specific
Plan area through 2040. These projects could occur on any property within the Specific Plan area
and affect existing or future land uses located within or surrounding the Specific Plan area,
including noise-sensitive receptors such as residential and school land uses. Thus, this analysis
broadly addresses the potential for Project implementation to result in temporary construction
noise impacts.
Construction of projects facilitated by the Downtown Specific Plan Update would generate noise
throughout the implementation period through 2040. This does not mean that all facilitated
projects would be under construction simultaneously until 2040; the City conservatively estimates
that a maximum 10 percent of buildout allowed under the Project could be under construction in
any given year, but there are also likely to be periods in which no construction occurs. The exact
location and types of development are not known, but the general location and types of
development can be reasonably anticipated. For example, projects would likely be concentrated
along Main Street and would consist mainly of low-rise or mid-rise buildings, in accordance with
existing and proposed site-Construction of these
projects would generate noise levels that are typical of demolition, site preparation, grading,
building construction, paving, and finishing activities for low-rise and mid-rise buildings. The
magnitude of potential construction noise impacts on noise-sensitive receptors would be
dependent on project-specific factors that are not known at this time (i.e., proximity to noise-
sensitive receptors, intervening barriers/structures, construction intensity, etc.), but given the
nevertheless possible to estimate noise levels and assess the significance of noise levels that
would be associated with construction of projects facilitated by the Downtown Specific Plan
Update. Table 10 presents noise levels associated with typical construction equipment that could
be utilized for the construction of future projects facilitated by the Downtown Specific Plan Update.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
Table 10
Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels
Typical
Predicted Noise Levels (dBA L) at Distance
eq
Equipment Construction
50 feet 100 feet 150 feet 200 feet 250 feet
Phases
Auger Drill Rig G, BC 77.4 71.3 67.8 65.3 63.4
Backhoe D, SP, G 73.6 67.6 64.0 61.5 59.6
Compactor G 76.2 70.2 66.7 64.2 62.3
Compressor (air) BC, F 73.7 67.7 64.1 61.6 59.7
Concrete Mixer Truck BC 74.8 68.8 65.3 62.8 60.8
Concrete Pump Truck BC 74.4 68.4 64.9 62.4 60.4
Crane BC 72.6 66.6 63.0 60.6 58.6
Dozer D, SP, G 77.7 71.7 68.1 65.6 63.7
Dump Truck D, SP, G 72.5 66.5 62.9 60.4 58.5
Excavator D, SP, G 76.7 70.7 67.2 64.7 62.8
Front End Loader D, SP, G, BC, P 75.1 69.1 65.6 63.1 61.2
Generator All Phases 77.6 71.6 68.1 65.6 63.6
Grader SP, G 81.0 75.0 71.5 69.0 67.0
Jackhammer D 81.9 75.9 72.4 69.9 67.9
Paver P 74.2 68.2 64.7 62.2 60.2
Pneumatic Tools All Phases 82.2 76.1 72.6 70.1 68.2
Roller G, P 73.0 67.0 63.5 61.0 59.0
Scraper SP, G 79.6 73.6 70.1 67.6 65.6
Welder BC 70.0 64.0 60.5 58.0 56.0
Notes:
D = Demolition
SP = Site Preparation
G = Grading
BC = Building Construction
F = Finishing
P = Paving
The noise levels shown do not account for ground attenuation factors.
Source: Noise levels derived from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Roadway Construction
Noise Model, version 1.1 (RCNM 1.1).
Actual construction noise levels would likely be highly variable, depending on a wide range of
project-specific factors. For example, some projects could involve extensive demolition and
grading that would require intensive use of several loud, heavy-duty earthmoving vehicles such
as dozers, excavators, and graders. Other projects could be renovation projects that would not
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
involve demolition or grading vehicles at all. Some projects could be located directly adjacent to
sensitive receptors, and other projects could be hundreds of feet away from sensitive receptors.
For all projects, construction noise levels at surrounding noise-sensitive receptors would fluctuate
depending on equipment distances from these receptors. For example, noise levels would be
greater when equipment operates in proximity of sensitive receptors and lower when equipment
is positioned farther away.
Regardless of the type and location of future projects, and irrespective of the other factors
discussed above, the City would review individual development proposals for compliance with
applicable noise control requirements. As discussed earlier, El Segundo Municipal Code Section
7-2-10(D) establishes that construction activities occurring between 7:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M.
Monday through Saturday (except federal holidays) do not exceed a noise standard of 65 dBA,
plus the permitted increases shown in Table 9. Construction activities occurring outside these
hours would be subject to the more stringent noise standards imposed by Section 7-2-4, which
include a 5 dBA over ambient threshold for residential land uses. Further, Section 7-2-13
establishes limits to ensure that noise levels do not reach levels capable of posing a threat to
health or welfare. Compliance with these requirements, as well as the application of project-
specific mitigation measures for future projects in the planning area as necessary (e.g., temporary
noise barriers for construction near sensitive residential receptors, use of quieter equipment, etc.),
would ensure that future development does not expose noise-sensitive receptors to substantial
noise increases from construction. The reasoning is as follows:
First, as discussed earlier, existing ambient noise levels within the Specific Plan area are in
excess of 65 dBA CNEL. The 65 dBA noise limit established by El Segundo Municipal Code
Section 7-2-10(D) aligns well with these existing conditions: by prohibiting substantial
exceedances of the 65 dBA noise limit, Section 7-2-10(D) would also prohibit substantial
exceedances of existing noise conditions at receptors during the regulated hours.
Second, construction occurring outside the regulated hours, while unlikely, would be subject to
the more stringent 5 dBA over ambient standard established by Section 7-2-4, which would also
prohibit substantial exceedances of existing noise conditions at receptors.
Third, notwithstanding the Section 7-2-10(D) and Section 7-2-4 noise standards, Section 7-2-13
would also ensure that construction noise levels do not reach levels associated with noise-
induced hearing loss.
noise-sensitive receptors are protected against substantial noise increases from construction
activities. As such, this impact would be less than significant.
5.1.1.2 Transportation and Mobility Enhancements
The Project also proposes the following transportation and mobility enhancements:
Pedestrian crossing enhancements at 12 locations
Area-wide sidewalk curb ramp enhancements
Bicycle mobility enhancements on two roadway segments
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
Area-wide bicycle accommodation and wayfinding enhancements
Bus stop enhancements at six existing bus stops
Signal operation enhancements on two roadway segments
Area-wide intersection control improvements (signage and striping)
In-road bollard receptacles for temporary street closures at two locations
Area-wide on-street parking striping enhancements
Area-wide off-street parking optimization enhancements
Limited details are available pertaining to the construction requirements of these proposed
enhancements, but, as discussed above, construction of the enhancements would be required to
comply with applicable noise control requirements, namely the noise limits established by El
Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-10(D), Section 7-2-4, and Section 7-2-13. And as explained
noise-sensitive receptors are protected against substantial noise increases from related
construction activities. As a result, impacts related to construction of these proposed
transportation and mobility enhancements would also be less than significant.
5.1.2 Operations Noise Impact
5.1.2.1 Stationary Noise Sources
Operations of the proposed retail, restaurant, office, medical office, and residential land uses
could involve stationary sources such as (but not limited to):
Landscaping/maintenance equipment
HVAC systems
Loading docks
Trash compactors
Parking lots
Outdoor dining areas
Outdoor residential open space/amenity areas (e.g., balconies, pool decks, etc.)
The exact location and types of development that would be facilitated by the Downtown Specific
Plan Update are not known. Like construction, the magnitude of potential stationary source noise
impacts on noise-sensitive receptors would be dependent on project-specific factors that are not
known at this time (e.g., proximity to noise-sensitive receptors, the size or number of stationary
sources, etc.).
sources would not result in substantial noise increases at noise-sensitive receptors. First, these
noise sources are already present within the Specific Plan area, which contains existing
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
commercial, retail, and residential uses. The Project would not introduce substantially different
uses and accompanying stationary noise sources (e.g., industrial uses, etc.) to the Specific Plan
area. Second, the types of commercial, retail, and residential uses that would be facilitated by the
Downtown Specific Plan Update and their common stationary noise sources are not associated
with substantial noise levels. For example, sources such as landscaping/maintenance equipment,
non-industrial loading docks, and trash compactors generate noise on an intermittent basis and
have a limited effect on daily ambient noise conditions. Sources such as HVAC systems, parking
lots, and outdoor gathering areas are more continuous but generate modest noise levels that are
consistent with existing conditions and ambient noise levels within the Specific Plan area. Third,
future projects and noise from their stationary sources would be subject to review for compliance
. During this time, the City would evaluate
conditions specific to the future projects, determine if the stationary noise sources being proposed
necessary, identify appropriate mitigation measures to reduce the severity of the impact. Notably,
those established by El Segundo Municipal Code Section 7-2-4 and Section 7-2-8. For example,
Section 7-2-4 would prohibit future projects from exceeding ambient noise levels at noise-
sensitive residential properties by more than 5 dBA, with limited adjustments. Thus, existing
ambient noise conditions at noise-sensitive residential properties would be protected against
substantial noise increases. Section 7-2-8 would additionally prohibit certain loud activities from
occurring during noise-sensitive evening and early morning hours. Given these considerations
ise regulations, significant noise impacts from stationary noise sources
would not occur under implementation of the Project, and this impact would be less than
significant.
5.1.2.2 Mobile Noise Sources (Traffic)
The Downtown Specific Plan Update does not propose or approve of any specific development
project that would generate traffic and therefore traffic-related noise, but by amending the land
use designation and zoning on eight parcels within the Specific Plan area, the Downtown Specific
Plan Update would facilitate construction of projects within the Specific Plan area through 2040.
The exact location and types of projects that would be facilitated by the Project are not known,
and the magnitude of potential traffic-related noise impacts would be dependent on project-
specific factors that are also not known at this time (e.g., proximity to noise-sensitive receptors,
land use type and size, trip generation rates, etc.). However, based on
trip generation and distribution, it is not anticipated that the Downtown Specific Plan Update would
result in substantial noise increases from traffic generated by future projects implemented under
the Specific Plan. In their Local Transportation Assessment of the Project, Fehr and Peers has
estimated
20
restaurant, office, medical office, and residential land uses within the Specific Plan area. Noise
2.5 (TNM 2.5). This noise prediction software uses traffic volumes, vehicle mix, average speeds,
20
Fehr and Peers, Local Transportation Assessment for the El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan
Update, April 2023.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
roadway geometry, and other inputs to estimate traffic-related noise levels along roadway
-related noise levels along roadways within
the Specific Plan area are shown below in Table 11. -related noise
trips only) would be no greater than 57 dBA L during the busiest peak hours. Given that existing
eq
noise levels within the Specific Plan area exceed 65 dBA CNEL, this demonstrates that noise
increases resultant from Project-related traffic would be nominal fractions of a decibel and below
the 3 dBA CNEL threshold of significance that represents a barely perceptible change (for
example, 57 dBA + 65 dBA = 65.6 dBA). As a result, -related noise impact
would be less than significant.
Table 11
Traffic Noise Levels from Full Project Buildout
Traffic Noise Level (dBA L)
eq
Roadway Segment
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Main Street, north of Mariposa Avenue 55.5 57.0
Main Street, south of Mariposa Avenue 55.4 56.7
Main Street, north of Grand Avenue 55.0 56.2
Main Street, south of Grand Avenue 53.2 54.7
Main Street, north of El Segundo Boulevard 51.8 53.6
Mariposa Avenue, west of Main Street 45.1 48.1
Mariposa Avenue, east of Main Street 43.8 45.1
Grand Avenue, west of Main Street 54.8 56.2
Grand Avenue, east of Main Street 54.1 55.8
El Segundo Boulevard, east of Main Street 52.1 53.6
Source: Modeling by NTEC, 2023. Traffic data provided by Fehr and Peers, 2023.
5.2 Threshold b):
Would the project result in generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
5.2.1 Construction-related Groundborne Vibration
Construction of projects and improvements facilitated by the Downtown Specific Plan Update
would generate groundborne vibration from the operations of construction equipment. Table 12
presents groundborne vibration levels associated with typical construction equipment that could
be utilized for the construction of future projects facilitated by the Downtown Specific Plan Update.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
Table 12
Typical Construction Equipment Groundborne Vibration Levels
Groundborne Vibration Level (in/sec PPV) at Distance
Equipment
25 feet 50 feet 75 feet 100 feet 125 feet
Vibratory Roller 0.210 0.098 0.063 0.046 0.036
Large Bulldozer 0.089 0.042 0.027 0.019 0.015
Small Bulldozer 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Auger Drill 0.089 0.042 0.027 0.019 0.015
Loaded Truck 0.076 0.035 0.023 0.017 0.013
Jackhammer 0.035 0.016 0.010 0.008 0.006
Impact Pile Driver (Upper Range) 1.518 0.708 0.453 0.330 0.258
Impact Pile Driver (Typical) 0.644 0.300 0.192 0.140 0.110
Vibratory Pile Driver (Upper Range) 0.734 0.342 0.219 0.160 0.125
Vibratory Pile Driver (Typical) 0.170 0.079 0.051 0.037 0.029
Source: Groundborne vibration levels derived from reference groundborne vibration levels provided by
Caltrans in its 2020 Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual and the FTA in its
2018 Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual.
As shown, certain construction equipment is capable of generating groundborne vibration levels
that exceed Caltrans criteria for building damage or severe human annoyance (see Table 3 and
Table 4, respectively). Actual groundborne vibration levels generated by construction activities
would likely be highly variable, depending on a wide range of project-specific factors. For
example, some projects would require intensive use of bulldozers or other grading equipment that
is the vibrational equivalent of bulldozers. Other projects could be renovation projects that would
not require this type of grading equipment. Some projects could be located directly adjacent to
structures that are more sensitive to groundborne vibration, and other projects could be over 100
feet from vibration-sensitive structures.
The City would review individual development proposals for compliance with El Segundo
Municipal Code Section 7-2-10(D), which prohibits construction-related groundborne vibration
levels that endanger the public health, welfare, and safety. Compliance with this regulatory
requirement, as well as the application of project-specific mitigation measures for future projects
in the Specific Plan area as necessary (e.g., utilizing alternative construction
equipment/techniques such as auger drilling instead of pile driving), would ensure that future
projects do not expose buildings to potentially damaging levels of groundborne vibration or levels
dings and people are
protected against substantial groundborne vibration levels from construction activities. As a result,
this impact would be less than significant.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Study
5.2.2 Operations-related Groundborne Vibration
The Project does not propose or allow for the implementation of land uses or improvements that
are associated with significant stationary sources of groundborne vibration, such as heavy
equipment or industrial operations. Operations of the retail, restaurant, office, medical office, and
residential uses would not contain such vibration sources. Nothwithstanding, El Segundo
Municipal Code Section 7-2-9 prohibits the generation of groundborne vibration that is perceptible
without instruments, which would ensure that future projects do not expose buildings to potentially
damaging levels of groundborne vibration or levels capable of causing human annoyance. As a
result, this impact would be less than significant.
5.3 Threshold c):
For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip
or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
The Specific Plan area is located less than 3,000 feet south of LAX, but only a small portion of
21
Mariposa Avenue along Main Street)
22
65 dBA CNEL noise contours. State planning standards consider all land uses with noise levels
from airport operations less than 65 dBA CNEL to be compatible with aircraft operations.
Therefore, the Project would not expose people or land uses to incompatible noise levels from
aircraft arriving at or departing from LAX, and this impact would be less than significant.
21
Source: https://data.lacounty.gov/datasets/lacounty::airport-influence-area-
1/explore?location=33.922920%2C-118.415184%2C16.00. Accessed September 7, 2023.
22
Los Angeles World Airports Quarterly Noise Reports. https://www.lawa.org/lawa-
environment/noise-management/lawa-noise-management-lax/california-state-airport-noise-
standards-quarterly-reports-and-contour-maps. Accessed September 5, 2023.
9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ 5ƚǞƓƷƚǞƓ {ƦĻĭźŅźĭ tƌğƓ
ƦķğƷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ /źƷǤ ƚŅ 9ƌ {ĻŭǒƓķƚ
{ĻƦƷĻƒĬĻƩ ЋЉЋЌ
Noise Appendix
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Project
!
Project
Imagery via Google
RECEPTOR LOCATION MAP
SENSITIVE
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan
MENT AND
EASURE
M
NOISE
1. Intersection of Main St. and Mariposa Ave.bƚźƭĻ wĻƦƚƩƷ
Summary
DateSeptember 7, 2023
Start Time11:51am
End Time12:01pm
File Name831_Data.111
Device ModelLarson Davis Model 831
WeightingA
ResponseSlow
Results
DescriptionValueDescriptionValue
L69.2dBL73.4dB
eq10
L80.7dBL65.2dB
max50
L52.4dBL58.0dB
min90
LAS > 65.0 dBA (Exceedance Count/Duration):20. 379.0s
LAS > 85.0 dBA (Exceedance Count/Duration):0, 0.0s
Statistics Chart
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
dBA
Page 1
Statistics Table
dB0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9%
52.00.000.000.000.000.040.080.170.120.060.070.5
53.00.020.020.020.030.020.020.020.020.050.070.3
54.00.110.070.060.070.040.050.020.070.060.110.65
55.00.270.230.220.240.150.220.270.160.140.152.04
56.00.150.240.210.180.220.260.340.260.320.342.51
57.00.400.310.290.450.560.400.430.380.430.313.95
58.00.670.730.570.560.470.520.460.340.430.415.18
59.00.330.320.370.510.510.440.420.500.560.654.61
60.00.500.590.530.490.480.490.350.300.360.364.45
61.00.290.370.350.400.290.420.480.460.380.343.77
62.00.570.510.530.580.700.470.410.470.410.415.06
63.00.410.530.660.770.550.620.730.680.820.726.48
64.00.840.801.030.840.790.820.900.710.750.858.34
65.00.860.770.760.600.680.630.650.600.630.716.89
66.00.650.620.650.650.540.700.710.580.620.796.48
67.00.610.640.690.730.810.620.620.510.610.546.36
68.00.570.440.430.370.390.490.530.450.520.504.69
69.00.380.450.420.450.450.530.550.640.570.575.00
70.00.540.540.570.520.410.420.400.350.320.364.42
71.00.320.410.360.300.320.480.370.350.300.313.51
72.00.320.280.300.300.300.340.330.410.360.423.35
73.00.430.360.330.290.310.350.290.250.230.323.14
74.00.260.260.170.220.240.280.210.250.230.312.42
75.00.330.250.180.180.150.160.240.220.260.162.12
76.00.160.170.160.130.200.150.160.140.090.091.43
77.00.100.110.150.180.130.110.060.070.070.071.05
78.00.080.060.060.070.080.080.090.090.080.060.75
79.00.040.040.040.040.040.040.060.020.030.050.41
80.00.020.020.020.030.010.030.010.010.000.000.14
Page 2
Logged Data Chart
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
Page 3
2. Intersection of Main St. and Holly Ave.bƚźƭĻ wĻƦƚƩƷ
Summary
DateSeptember 7, 2023
Start Time12:05pm
End Time12:15pm
File Name831_Data.112
Device ModelLarson Davis Model 831
WeightingA
ResponseSlow
Results
DescriptionValueDescriptionValue
L65.7dBL70.2dB
eq10
L76.6dBL61.2dB
max50
L53.3dBL56.7dB
min90
LAS > 65.0 dBA (Exceedance Count/Duration):20,225.0s
LAS > 85.0 dBA (Exceedance Count/Duration):0, 0.0s
Statistics Chart
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
dBA
Page 1
Statistics Table
dB0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9%
53.00.000.000.000.010.150.320.290.310.230.321.6
54.00.210.170.110.160.290.290.250.270.190.202.1
55.00.200.250.270.220.260.430.390.380.390.613.38
56.00.500.460.370.240.250.380.580.590.760.734.85
57.00.610.640.660.901.021.070.841.001.010.888.63
58.01.000.850.610.580.780.840.730.801.031.198.40
59.00.950.910.981.041.231.391.180.981.031.0110.68
60.01.001.211.251.020.820.780.950.770.710.599.10
61.00.520.500.540.580.460.490.570.410.520.485.06
62.00.470.490.500.440.380.340.370.550.500.494.51
63.00.440.430.460.460.430.430.460.520.510.394.53
64.00.560.420.390.500.410.510.410.490.580.474.72
65.00.560.470.380.470.470.390.390.400.410.494.41
66.00.500.520.690.750.470.430.430.420.540.535.27
67.00.680.510.550.620.480.450.450.480.440.485.13
68.00.410.400.330.290.330.360.370.320.330.263.38
69.00.370.360.410.290.430.400.340.320.340.263.51
70.00.330.310.320.510.400.270.290.330.330.303.38
71.00.430.360.290.300.330.300.270.310.400.373.38
72.00.290.170.190.200.230.220.200.160.190.101.94
73.00.100.130.110.090.080.140.110.060.060.060.91
74.00.080.060.040.070.060.050.050.040.030.030.52
75.00.040.040.040.040.050.040.040.050.030.040.39
76.00.030.040.040.030.010.010.000.000.000.000.16
Page 2
Logged Data Chart
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
Page 3
3. Intersection of Main St. and GrandAve.bƚźƭĻ wĻƦƚƩƷ
Summary
DateSeptember 7, 2023
Start Time12:18pm
End Time12:28pm
File Name831_Data.113
Device ModelLarson Davis Model 831
WeightingA
ResponseSlow
Results
DescriptionValueDescriptionValue
L67.7dBL68.9dB
eq10
L88.1dBL63.6dB
max50
L56.3dBL59.2dB
min90
LAS > 65.0 dBA (Exceedance Count/Duration):23,277.4s
LAS > 85.0 dBA (Exceedance Count/Duration):1, 1.6s
Statistics Chart
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
dBA
Page 1
Statistics Table
dB0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9%
56.00.000.000.000.040.070.120.200.220.210.151.0
57.00.380.520.360.450.310.260.350.570.550.384.1
58.00.320.370.310.550.490.450.380.400.360.323.94
59.00.500.360.510.470.620.520.450.560.600.635.21
60.00.970.700.710.610.720.680.660.670.700.476.88
61.00.440.520.590.730.670.870.881.221.291.198.38
62.01.301.311.311.241.331.301.391.041.281.4712.95
63.01.031.251.051.001.271.311.161.101.101.2111.47
64.01.411.331.081.431.010.950.931.171.081.0611.44
65.00.970.980.880.830.830.770.750.880.850.858.59
66.00.750.610.510.570.500.520.600.870.580.746.23
67.00.810.690.640.570.660.500.300.340.450.415.35
68.00.490.470.500.470.510.530.420.420.430.274.50
69.00.210.300.300.230.210.200.160.210.180.162.16
70.00.150.160.180.170.210.150.170.150.140.171.65
71.00.150.170.200.170.290.320.200.150.210.141.99
72.00.080.070.050.060.070.100.070.060.050.050.65
73.00.040.040.040.050.040.040.040.040.040.030.38
74.00.040.040.110.040.030.040.050.090.080.050.56
75.00.060.050.050.050.050.050.030.030.030.040.43
76.00.030.030.030.040.040.030.040.030.040.030.33
77.00.040.040.040.040.040.050.040.040.050.040.41
78.00.050.100.060.070.060.070.040.030.030.040.54
79.00.050.080.030.050.070.010.010.010.010.010.33
80.00.020.030.080.010.010.010.000.010.010.010.17
81.00.010.010.010.000.010.010.010.000.010.010.05
82.00.000.010.010.000.010.010.000.010.010.000.05
83.00.010.000.010.010.000.010.010.010.010.000.04
84.00.010.010.000.010.010.000.010.000.010.000.05
85.00.010.010.000.010.010.010.000.010.000.010.05
86.00.000.010.000.010.010.000.010.000.010.010.05
87.00.000.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.06
88.00.020.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.02
Page 2
Logged Data Chart
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
Page 3
4. Intersection of Main St. and El Segundo Blvd.bƚźƭĻ wĻƦƚƩƷ
Summary
DateSeptember 7, 2023
Start Time12:31pm
End Time12:41pm
File Name831_Data.114
Device ModelLarson Davis Model 831
WeightingA
ResponseSlow
Results
DescriptionValueDescriptionValue
L68.0dBL69.0dB
eq10
L87.2dBL63.8dB
max50
L58.3dBL60.4dB
min90
LAS > 65.0 dBA (Exceedance Count/Duration):21,300.6s
LAS > 85.0 dBA (Exceedance Count/Duration):1, 2.8s
Statistics Chart
2.00
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
dBA
Page 1
Statistics Table
dB0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9%
58.00.000.000.000.000.200.170.200.320.540.411.8
59.00.220.110.580.380.350.220.640.670.480.624.3
60.00.850.531.001.110.791.000.820.760.850.688.39
61.01.610.751.221.191.521.511.691.821.491.6014.40
62.01.391.761.591.370.901.080.950.981.151.4812.63
63.01.490.980.940.890.740.760.981.421.351.1610.69
64.01.291.351.361.331.191.261.141.261.521.2812.96
65.01.071.241.191.250.990.830.811.010.820.559.75
66.00.700.650.600.780.690.580.720.650.580.386.31
67.00.500.440.580.480.460.400.390.280.320.434.28
68.00.480.350.300.390.410.420.360.500.620.544.36
69.00.390.230.230.200.220.310.230.170.150.142.25
70.00.170.230.180.130.150.180.190.180.220.231.83
71.00.240.140.120.190.160.120.110.120.170.121.48
72.00.060.060.070.110.050.050.050.110.100.090.74
73.00.180.090.080.160.090.100.080.100.060.141.07
74.00.110.080.050.060.060.060.050.060.050.110.67
75.00.160.090.090.050.070.080.110.080.020.020.76
76.00.020.020.020.020.030.030.050.070.070.050.38
77.00.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.07
78.00.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.07
79.00.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.07
80.00.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.07
81.00.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.07
82.00.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.000.010.010.07
83.00.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.08
84.00.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.09
85.00.010.010.010.010.010.010.020.020.010.010.11
86.00.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.040.030.14
87.00.030.050.020.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.09
Page 2
Logged Data Chart
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
Page 3
5. Intersection of Richmond St. and Grand Ave.bƚźƭĻ wĻƦƚƩƷ
Summary
DateSeptember 7, 2023
Start Time12:46pm
End Time12:56pm
File Name831_Data.115
Device ModelLarson Davis Model 831
WeightingA
ResponseSlow
Results
DescriptionValueDescriptionValue
L62.9dBL69.0dB
eq10
L74.1dBL63.8dB
max50
L51.9dBL60.4dB
min90
LAS > 65.0 dBA (Exceedance Count/Duration):22,142.0s
LAS > 85.0 dBA (Exceedance Count/Duration):0, 0.0s
Statistics Chart
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
dBA
Page 1
Statistics Table
dB0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9%
51.00.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.030.0
52.00.050.050.040.060.060.050.030.030.060.030.5
53.00.030.030.020.080.210.070.090.090.060.040.72
54.00.070.220.060.050.050.170.110.190.250.291.45
55.00.420.260.170.190.330.410.640.630.621.144.79
56.00.710.931.071.021.101.371.351.121.211.1611.04
57.01.191.080.901.080.830.870.770.861.011.209.78
58.01.011.051.021.141.141.111.011.020.900.9110.30
59.01.011.171.171.051.061.060.980.780.740.879.88
60.00.740.950.750.740.620.680.750.920.800.777.70
61.00.941.001.020.940.770.690.640.610.610.848.04
62.00.840.770.750.860.860.650.600.580.650.607.15
63.00.670.680.630.510.550.570.590.630.630.596.05
64.00.580.550.550.530.530.460.540.500.570.475.28
65.00.540.590.560.420.460.440.530.450.450.484.92
66.00.520.450.380.330.340.400.400.330.350.433.93
67.00.380.290.430.330.240.280.300.310.280.263.09
68.00.220.240.220.280.250.240.180.230.190.152.21
69.00.160.190.200.180.130.120.120.110.170.111.49
70.00.080.080.080.100.070.080.050.040.040.040.66
71.00.040.050.040.040.030.030.030.040.040.050.39
72.00.050.060.060.080.030.030.030.040.060.010.45
73.00.010.010.010.010.020.020.010.010.010.050.16
74.00.050.010.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.06
Page 2
Logged Data Chart
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
Page 3
ǤƦźĭğƌ /ƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷźƚƓ 9ƨǒźƦƒĻƓƷ DƩƚǒƓķĬƚƩƓĻ źĬƩğƷźƚƓ \[ĻǝĻƌƭ Ώ tt ΛźƓΉƭĻĭΜ
Vibratory Roller
Equipment:Vibratory Roller
Equipment PPV (in/sec):0.21
Reference Distance (ft):25
"n" value1.1
Vibration Level
Distance (ft)(in/sec PPV)
Receptor
Example at 25ft250.210
Example at 50ft500.098
Example at 75ft750.063
Example at 100ft1000.046
Example at 125ft1250.036
---
Large Bulldozer
Equipment:Large Bulldozer
Equipment PPV (in/sec):0.089
Reference Distance (ft):25
"n" value1.1
Vibration Level
Distance (ft)(in/sec PPV)
Receptor
Example at 25ft250.089
Example at 50ft500.042
Example at 75ft750.027
Example at 100ft1000.019
Example at 125ft1250.015
---
Small Bulldozer
Equipment:Small Bulldozer
Equipment PPV (in/sec):0.003
Reference Distance (ft):25
"n" value1.1
Vibration Level
Distance (ft)(in/sec PPV)
Receptor
Example at 25ft250.003
Example at 50ft500.001
Example at 75ft750.001
Example at 100ft1000.001
Example at 125ft1250.001
---
Downtown Specific Plan Update
Auger Drill
Equipment:Auger Drill
Equipment PPV (in/sec):0.089
Reference Distance (ft):25
"n" value1.1
Vibration Level
Distance (ft)(in/sec PPV)
Receptor
Example at 25ft250.089
Example at 50ft500.042
Example at 75ft750.027
Example at 100ft1000.019
Example at 125ft1250.015
---
Loaded Truck
Equipment:Loaded Truck
Equipment PPV (in/sec):0.076
Reference Distance (ft):25
"n" value1.1
Vibration Level
Distance (ft)(in/sec PPV)
Receptor
Example at 25ft250.076
Example at 50ft500.035
Example at 75ft750.023
Example at 100ft1000.017
Example at 125ft1250.013
---
Jackhammer
Equipment:Jackhammer
Equipment PPV (in/sec):0.035
Reference Distance (ft):25
"n" value1.1
Vibration Level
Distance (ft)(in/sec PPV)
Receptor
Example at 25ft250.035
Example at 50ft500.016
Example at 75ft750.010
Example at 100ft1000.008
Example at 125ft1250.006
---
Downtown Specific Plan Update
Impact Pile Driver (Upper Range)
Equipment:Impact Pile Driver (Upper Range)
Equipment PPV (in/sec):1.518
Reference Distance (ft):25
"n" value1.1
Vibration Level
Distance (ft)(in/sec PPV)
Receptor
Example at 25ft251.518
Example at 50ft500.708
Example at 75ft750.453
Example at 100ft1000.330
Example at 125ft1250.258
---
Impact Pile Driver (Typical)
Equipment:Impact Pile Driver (Typical)
Equipment PPV (in/sec):0.644
Reference Distance (ft):25
"n" value1.1
Vibration Level
Distance (ft)(in/sec PPV)
Receptor
Example at 25ft250.644
Example at 50ft500.300
Example at 75ft750.192
Example at 100ft1000.140
Example at 125ft1250.110
---
Vibratory Pile Driver (Upper Range)
Equipment:Vibratory Pile Drive (Upper Range)
Equipment PPV (in/sec):0.734
Reference Distance (ft):25
"n" value1.1
Vibration Level
Distance (ft)(in/sec PPV)
Receptor
Example at 25ft250.734
Example at 50ft500.342
Example at 75ft750.219
Example at 100ft1000.160
Example at 125ft1250.125
---
Downtown Specific Plan Update
Vibratory Pile Driver (Typical)
Equipment:Vibratory Pile Drive (Typical)
Equipment PPV (in/sec):0.17
Reference Distance (ft):25
"n" value1.1
Vibration Level
Distance (ft)(in/sec PPV)
Receptor
Example at 25ft250.170
Example at 50ft500.079
Example at 75ft750.051
Example at 100ft1000.037
Example at 125ft1250.029
---
Downtown Specific Plan Update
APPENDIX H: PUBLIC SERVICES AGENCY
LETTERS
July 31, 2023
Robert Espinosa, Interim Fire Chief
El Segundo Fire Department
314 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
SENT VIA email: respinosa@elsegundo.org
RE: El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Request for Fire Service Information
Dear Chief Espinosa,
EcoTierra Consulting is preparing environmental documentation for the proposed El Segundo
Downtown Specific Plan Update in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). The City of El Segundo is the Lead Agency for the Project under the CEQA. Downtown El
Segundo is located southwest of the interchange of Interstate 405 Freeway (I-405) and State
Route 90 (Imperial Highway), west of Pacific Coast Highway and north of El Segundo Boulevard.
Interstate 105 Freeway (I-105) is north of the Specific Plan area, immediately north of Imperial
Highway (Refer to Figure 1, Regional Location Map and Figure 2, Project Plan Area).
The Project is an update to the adopted El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan, which serves as
land use and zoning for properties within the boundaries of the Specific Plan area. The Project
would revise existing Specific Plan planning districts, amend General Plan and zoning
designations on eight parcels, and include mobility enhancements. The Project would include
public improvements and streetscape guidelines, private urban form criteria, permitted land
uses, development standards, mobility and infrastructure improvements, an implementation
plan, and administration processes.
ral Plan to change
the land use designation on eight parcels from Downtown Commercial to Downtown Specific
from Downtown Commercial (C-RS) to Downtown Specific Plan (DSP). The Project would allow
for increases of up to 130,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses, 200,000 square feet of
office uses, 24,000 square feet of medical office uses, and 300 residential units.
In addition to land use and zoning changes, the Project would include mobility enhancements
including expanding pedestrian areas along portions of Main Street, Richmond Street, and
Grand Avenue, which would create potential changes to the number of travel lanes on those
streets. The Project would potentially relocate a portion of an existing truck route that is located
on Main Street between El Segundo Boulevard and Grand Avenue (pending a future Truck Route
Study); proposes the potential permanent closure of a portion of Richmond Street to vehicles,
Chief Espinosa
El Segundo Fire Department
July 31, 2023
Page 2
generally from Franklin Avenue to Grand Avenue, to create a permanent pedestrian only street
for outdoor dining and gathering; and recommends maintaining the existing Class III bike route
s on Main Street and Grand
Avenue. The Project would include pedestrian and transit improvements in the Project area
including widened sidewalks and expanded outdoor seating and dining areas for area
restaurants. Transit improvements could include bus stop enhancements such as additional
transit shelters, lighting, and furnishings, and potentially provide expanded bus zones.
The Project would include modifications to parking standards and strategies and alternatives for
on-street parking and potentially provide two new parking structures at the northwest corner of
Grand Avenue and Standard Street and the northeast corner of Richmond Street and Franklin
Avenue. Lastly, the 2000 Specific Plan area was previously divided into six districts and the
Specific Plan Update would adjust the Specific Plan area into four districts: Main Street,
Richmond Street, Grand Avenue, and Civic Center districts.
Potential impacts to public services are an important element of our study, and our analysis
strongly relies on your assistance in identifying potentially significant impacts to the El Segundo
Fire Department (ESFD) that may occur as a result of the proposed Project, as well as any
mitigation measure(s) that may reduce or eliminate these impacts. Any assistance that you can
provide with addressing the following questions would be greatly appreciated.
1. Which fire station provides first-response service? Would any additional fire stations
serve the Project? Please provide the applicable fire station numbers as well as the
respective addresses?
2. What staffing levels, by type (e.g., Captains, Lieutenants, firefighters, paramedics, EMTs,
HazMat-trained personnel) are currently maintained for these fire stations?
3. What are the existing equipment inventories (e.g., numbers of engines, trucks, rescue
ambulances, etc.) at each fire station included in your response to question one?
4. What is the ESFD-desired response distance to a fire station? Does the distance from the
Project site to each fire station meet the desired response distance standards of the
ESFD?
5. What is/are the average response time(s) from each fire station included in your
response to question one to the Project area? Does each response time meet the
desired performance standards of the ESFD?
Chief Espinosa
El Segundo Fire Department
July 31, 2023
Page 3
6. Can you provide a breakdown of service calls by type (emergency or non-emergency, etc)
for each station over any given time frame (month or year) as well as City averages for
the same time frame?
7. What is the current fire protection service demand within the Project area?
8. Do standard criteria exist for evaluating acceptable fire protection service levels, and for
assessing the significance of impacts to service levels imposed by implementation of the
proposed Project?
9. What is considered an adequate level of service?
10. Would the proposed Project result in the need for expansion of existing or construction
of new fire stations?
11. What are the fire flow and residual water pressure requirements for the proposed
Project? Can you confirm whether existing water pressure and availability in the Project
area would meet these requirements?
12. Please provide any recommendations or special concerns that may assist us in avoiding
or reducing the occurrence of potential impacts to fire services associated with the
proposed Project.
Thank you for your assistance, which will help us ensure that our analysis of the proposed P
impacts on the ESFD is accurate and complete. Should you have any questions, feel free to call me
at (213) 235-4772. You may also reach me by email at jennifer@ecotierraconsulting.com. In order
to ensure a timely completion of our analysis, please provide your response (via mail or email) no
later than August 21, 2023.
Sincerely,
EcoTierra Consulting
Jennifer Johnson
Project Manager
Enclosures
QSPKFDU!TJUF
Qspkfdu!Bsfb
Tpvsdf;!PqfoTusffuNbqt!boe!Hpphmf!Nbqt-!Efdfncfs!3133/
Gjhvsf!2
Sfhjpobm!boe!Qspkfdu!Wjdjojuz!Nbq
EL SEGUNDO BLVD
4136-027-010
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvh-!Bvhvtu!3133/
FRANKLIN AVE
GRAND AVE
HOLLY AVE
PINE AVE
MARIPOSA AVE
dtopxAfmtfhvoep/psh!}!xxx/fmtfhvoepge/psh
Kfoojgfs!Kpiotpo!}!Qspkfdu!Nbobhfs
FdpUjfssb!Dpotvmujoh
!
kfoojgfsAfdpujfssbdpotvmujoh/dpn
!
xxx/fdpujfssbdpotvmujoh/dpn
dtopxAfmtfhvoep/psh!}!xxx/fmtfhvoepge/psh
1) ESFD Station 1 (314 main Street ES) will be the closest station to the area, and ESFD Station 2
(2261 East Mariposa) will be the next closest station to the area.
2) Station 1 staffing level: 1 Battalion Chief, 1 captain, 1Engineer, 1 Firefighter, and 2 Firefighter
Paramedics. Station 2 staffing level: 2 captains, 2 Engineers, 2 Firefighters, and 2 Firefighter
paramedics.
3) Station 1 equipment: 1 Battalion Chief vehicle, 1 Fire engine, 1 Ambulance. Station 2
equipment: 1 Fire engine, 1 Ladder Truck, 1 Ambulance, and Urban Search and Rescue Vehicle.
4) Station 1 is in the area of the project, and the response distance meets the standard.
5) This will be answered by Paul Rottenberg from the company called Fire Stats. I introduced you
via email.
6) Station 1 responded to 1,655 calls for service in 2022, and Station 2 responded to 1,422 calls for
service in 2022. The following is a count of ESFD calls for service for 2022:
7) The demand includes water supply for hydrants, standpipes, and sprinklers, fire access, fire and
smoke detection, and kitchen extinguishing systems.
8) Standard criteria includes the California Fire Code, California Building Code, El Segundo
Municipal Code, etc.
9) The response times for the area will be adequate. Station 1 is location inside the proposed plan
area.
10) No.
11) We will work on the fire flow and residual pressure requirements for the proposed project;
however, our existing water pressure should meet the requirements.
12) Fire access on streets (street closures, dining area closures, etc.), height of banners and arches
to meet minimum 15 ft clearance, and other Code requirements will be of concern and will
reduce impact to the services we provide.
July 31, 2023
Jaime Bermudez, Chief of Police
El Segundo Police Department
348 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
SENT VIA email: jbermudez@elsegundo.org
RE: El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Request for Police Service Information
Dear Chief Bermudez:
EcoTierra Consulting is preparing environmental documentation for the proposed El Segundo
Downtown Specific Plan Update in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). The City of El Segundo is the Lead Agency for the Project under the CEQA. Downtown El
Segundo is located southwest of the interchange of Interstate 405 Freeway (I-405) and State
Route 90 (Imperial Highway), west of Pacific Coast Highway and north of El Segundo Boulevard.
Interstate 105 Freeway (I-105) is north of the Specific Plan area, immediately north of Imperial
Highway (Refer to Figure 1, Regional Location Map and Figure 2, Project Plan Area).
The Project is an update to the adopted El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan, which serves as land
use and zoning for properties within the boundaries of the Specific Plan area. The Project would
revise existing Specific Plan planning districts, amend General Plan and zoning designations on
eight parcels, and include mobility enhancements. The Project would include public
improvements and streetscape guidelines, private urban form criteria, permitted land uses,
development standards, mobility and infrastructure improvements, an implementation plan, and
administration processes.
the land use designation on eight parcels from Downtown Commercial to Downtown Specific Plan.
Downtown Commercial (C-RS) to Downtown Specific Plan (DSP). The Project would allow for
increases of up to 130,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses, 200,000 square feet of office
uses, 24,000 square feet of medical office uses, and 300 residential units.
El Segundo Police Department
July 30, 2023
Page 2
In addition to land use and zoning changes, the Project would include mobility enhancements
including expanding pedestrian areas along portions of Main Street, Richmond Street, and Grand
Avenue, which would create potential changes to the number of travel lanes on those streets. The
Project would potentially relocate a portion of an existing truck route that is located on Main
Street between El Segundo Boulevard and Grand Avenue (pending a future Truck Route Study);
proposes the potential permanent closure of a portion of Richmond Street to vehicles, generally
from Franklin Avenue to Grand Avenue, to create a permanent pedestrian only street for outdoor
with alternative concepts for buffered bicycle lanes on Main Street and Grand Avenue. The Project
would include pedestrian and transit improvements in the Project area including widened
sidewalks and expanded outdoor seating and dining areas for area restaurants. Transit
improvements could include bus stop enhancements such as additional transit shelters, lighting,
and furnishings, and potentially provide expanded bus zones.
The Project would include modifications to parking standards and strategies and alternatives for
on-street parking and potentially provide two new parking structures at the northwest corner of
Grand Avenue and Standard Street and the northeast corner of Richmond Street and Franklin
Avenue. Lastly, the 2000 Specific Plan area was previously divided into six districts and the Specific
Plan Update would adjust the Specific Plan area into four districts: Main Street, Richmond Street,
Grand Avenue, and Civic Center districts.
Potential impacts to public services are an important element of our study, and our analysis
strongly relies on your assistance in identifying potentially significant impacts to police services
that may occur as a result of the project, as well as any mitigation measure(s) that may reduce or
eliminate these impacts. Any assistance that you can provide with addressing the following
questions would be greatly appreciated.
1. Which polices station provides first-response service to the project area? Would any
additional police stations serve the project? Please provide the applicable police station
numbers and/or names as well as the respective addresses.
2. What staffing levels by type (e.g., Captains, Lieutenants, officers, and unsworn
personnel) are currently maintained for the police station(s) included in your response
to question one?
3. What is the current officer-to-citizen ratio?
El Segundo Police Department
July 30, 2023
Page 3
4. What, if any, is the ESPD-desired officer-to-citizen ratio? Does the current officer-to-
citizen ratio meet the desired service ratio standard of the ESPD?
5. What is the average response time (for emergency and non-emergency calls) in the
projectnd Citywide? Does each response time meet
the desired performance standards?
6. What is the current police protection service demand within the project area?
7. Do standard criteria exist for evaluating acceptable police protection service levels, and
for assessing the significance of impacts to service levels imposed by implementation
of the Project?
8. What is considered an adequate level of service?
9. Would the Project result in the need for expansion of existing or construction of new
police stations?
10. Please provide any recommendations or special concerns that may assist us in avoiding
or reducing the occurrence of potential impacts to police services associated with the
Project.
impacts on the ESPD is accurate and complete. Should you have any questions, feel free to call me
at (213) 235-4772. You may also reach me by email at jennifer@ecotierraconsulting.com. In order
to ensure a timely completion of our analysis, please provide your response (via mail or email) no
later than August 21, 2023.
Sincerely
EcoTierra Consulting, Inc.
Jennifer Johnson
Project Manager
Enclosures
QSPKFDU!TJUF
Qspkfdu!Bsfb
Tpvsdf;!PqfoTusffuNbqt!boe!Hpphmf!Nbqt-!Efdfncfs!3133/
Gjhvsf!2
Sfhjpobm!boe!Qspkfdu!Wjdjojuz!Nbq
EL SEGUNDO BLVD
4136-027-010
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvh-!Bvhvtu!3133/
FRANKLIN AVE
GRAND AVE
HOLLY AVE
PINE AVE
MARIPOSA AVE
July 31, 2023
Dr. Melissa Moore, Superintendent
El Segundo Unified School District
641 Sheldon Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
SENT VIA email: mmoore@esusd.net
RE: El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Request for School Service Information
Dear Dr. Moore-
EcoTierra Consulting is preparing environmental documentation for the proposed El Segundo
Downtown Specific Plan Update in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). The City of El Segundo is the Lead Agency for the Project under the CEQA. Downtown El
Segundo is located southwest of the interchange of Interstate 405 Freeway (I-405) and State
Route 90 (Imperial Highway), west of Pacific Coast Highway and north of El Segundo Boulevard.
Interstate 105 Freeway (I-105) is north of the Specific Plan area, immediately north of Imperial
Highway (Refer to Figure 1, Regional Location Map and Figure 2, Project Plan Area).
The Project is an update to the adopted El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan, which serves as land
use and zoning for properties within the boundaries of the Specific Plan area. The Project would
revise existing Specific Plan planning districts, amend General Plan and zoning designations on
eight parcels, and include mobility enhancements. The Project would include public
improvements and streetscape guidelines, private urban form criteria, permitted land uses,
development standards, mobility and infrastructure improvements, an implementation plan, and
administration processes.
the land use designation on eight parcels from Downtown Commercial to Downtown Specific Plan.
Downtown Commercial (C-RS) to Downtown Specific Plan (DSP). The Project would allow for
increases of up to 130,000 square feet of retail and restaurant uses, 200,000 square feet of office
uses, 24,000 square feet of medical office uses, and 300 residential units.
Dr. Melissa Moore
El Segundo Unified School District
July 31, 2023
Page 2
In addition to land use and zoning changes, the Project would include mobility enhancements
including expanding pedestrian areas along portions of Main Street, Richmond Street, and Grand
Avenue, which would create potential changes to the number of travel lanes on those streets. The
Project would potentially relocate a portion of an existing truck route that is located on Main
Street between El Segundo Boulevard and Grand Avenue (pending a future Truck Route Study);
proposes the potential permanent closure of a portion of Richmond Street to vehicles, generally
from Franklin Avenue to Grand Avenue, to create a permanent pedestrian only street for outdoor
with alternative concepts for buffered bicycle lanes on Main Street and Grand Avenue. The Project
would include pedestrian and transit improvements in the Project area including widened
sidewalks and expanded outdoor seating and dining areas for area restaurants. Transit
improvements could include bus stop enhancements such as additional transit shelters, lighting,
and furnishings, and potentially provide expanded bus zones.
The Project would include modifications to parking standards and strategies and alternatives for
on-street parking and potentially provide two new parking structures at the northwest corner of
Grand Avenue and Standard Street and the northeast corner of Richmond Street and Franklin
Avenue. Lastly, the 2000 Specific Plan area was previously divided into six districts and the Specific
Plan Update would adjust the Specific Plan area into four districts: Main Street, Richmond Street,
Grand Avenue, and Civic Center districts.
Potential impacts to public services are an important element of our study, and our analysis
strongly relies on your assistance in identifying potentially significant impacts to the school
services that may occur as a result of the Project, as well as any mitigation measure(s) that may
reduce or eliminate these impacts. Any assistance that you can provide with addressing the
following questions would be greatly appreciated.
1. Please provide a list of schools that would serve the Project.
2. What are the current enrollments and total student capacities of each school included
in your response to question one?
3. Are there any improvements or additions planned for schools that serve the Project
area?
4. Are there plans to build any new schools that would serve the Project?
Dr. Melissa Moore
El Segundo Unified School District
July 31, 2023
Page 3
impacts on the ESUSD is accurate and complete. Should you have any questions, feel free to call me
at (213) 235-4772. You may also reach me by email at jennifer@ecotierraconsulting.com. In order
to ensure a timely completion of our analysis, please provide your response (via mail or email) no
later than August 21, 2023.
Sincerely,
EcoTierra Consulting, Inc.
Jennifer Johnson
Project Manager
Enclosures
QSPKFDU!TJUF
Qspkfdu!Bsfb
Tpvsdf;!PqfoTusffuNbqt!boe!Hpphmf!Nbqt-!Efdfncfs!3133/
Gjhvsf!2
Sfhjpobm!boe!Qspkfdu!Wjdjojuz!Nbq
EL SEGUNDO BLVD
4136-027-010
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvh-!Bvhvtu!3133/
FRANKLIN AVE
GRAND AVE
HOLLY AVE
PINE AVE
MARIPOSA AVE
Uijt!dpnnvojdbujpo!)boe!boz!bttpdjbufe!buubdinfout*!jt!joufoefe!up!cf!dpnnvojdbufe!up!uif
beesfttff!pomz/!Jg!zpv!bsf!opu!uif!beesfttff!ps!jg!zpv!ibwf!epvcut!xifuifs!zpv!bsf!uif!beesfttff-
zpv!nbz!opu!ejttfnjobuf-!tfoe-!sfusbotnju-!ejtusjcvuf-!qsjou-!qvcmjti!ps!puifsxjtf!sfqvcmjti!uijt
dpnnvojdbujpo!)boe!boz!bttpdjbufe!buubdinfout*!..!bmm!tvdi!bdut!bsf!tusjdumz!qspijcjufe/!Uif!tfoefs
pg!uijt!dpnnvojdbujpo!)boe!boz!bttpdjbufe!buubdinfout*!sftfswft!bmm!qsjwjmfhft-!dpqzsjhiut-!usbef
tfdsfut!boe!bmm!puifs!joufmmfduvbm!qspqfsuz!sjhiu-!ujumf!boe!joufsftu!jo!bo!up!uif!dpoufout!pg!uijt
dpnnvojdbujpo!)boe!boz!bttpdjbufe!buubdinfout*/!Jg!zpv!ibwf!sfdfjwfe!uijt!dpnnvojdbujpo!jo!fssps-
qmfbtf!opujgz!uif!tfoefs!jnnfejbufmz!boe!uifo!efmfuf!uijt!dpnnvojdbujpo!gspn!zpvs!dpnqvufs/!Uif
tfoefs!gvsuifs!sftfswft!uif!sjhiu!up!npojups!jut!dpnnvojdbujpot/
Kfoojgfs!Kpiotpo!}!Qspkfdu!Nbobhfs
FdpUjfssb!Dpotvmujoh
!
kfoojgfsAfdpujfssbdpotvmujoh/dpn
!
xxx/fdpujfssbdpotvmujoh/dpn
APPENDIX I: TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
El Segundo
Downtown Specific
Plan Update
Transportation Assessment
Prepared for:
RRM Design Group, EcoTierra, and the City of El
Segundo
January 2024
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5
1.1 Project Description ...............................................................................................................................................................
5
1.2 Transportation Assessment Scope ................................................................................................................................. 7
1.3 Organization of this Transportation Assessment Report ...................................................................................... 9
2. Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................ 10
2.1 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................................................10
Study Area ............................................................................................................................................................................10
Existing Street System ......................................................................................................................................................10
Existing Public Transit ......................................................................................................................................................15
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ..................................................................................................................16
2.2 Cumulative with Project Conditions ............................................................................................................................17
3. CEQA Transportation Assessment ......................................................................................... 18
3.1 Plans, Programs, Ordinances and Policies (PPOP) Review .................................................................................18
3.2 Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis .....................................................................................................................................21
Impact Criteria .....................................................................................................................................................................22
Impact Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................................23
Summary ...............................................................................................................................................................................24
3.3 Geometric Hazards Review .............................................................................................................................................25
3.3.1 Proposed Pedestrian Network ...........................................................................................................................25
3.3.2 Proposed Bicycle Network ..................................................................................................................................26
3.3.3 Proposed Roadway Sections ..............................................................................................................................26
3.3.4 Proposed Vehicular Circulation Enhancements ..........................................................................................27
3.3.5 Proposed Public Transit Amenities ..................................................................................................................28
3.3.6 Proposed Parking Enhancements .....................................................................................................................28
3.3.7 Proposed Placemaking Enhancements ..........................................................................................................29
3.4 Inadequate Emergency Access Review ......................................................................................................................29
3.4.1 Emergency Medical Access .................................................................................................................................30
3.4.2 Emergency Fire Access ..........................................................................................................................................31
3.4.3 Police Access .............................................................................................................................................................31
4. Summary and Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 32
4.1.1 Plans, Programs, Ordinances and Policies (PPOP) Summary .............................................................32
4.1.2 VMT Summary ......................................................................................................................................................32
4.1.3 Geometric Hazards Review Summary .........................................................................................................32
4.1.4 Inadequate Emergency Access Review Summary ..................................................................................33
Appendix A -Preferred Roadway Sections..............................................................................34
Appendix B - PPOP Review ........................................................................................................ 35
Appendix C SED TAZ Inputs for Activity-Based Model (ABM) ............................................ 36
Appendix D Project Area Existing Parcel Data ...................................................................... 37
Appendix E The Natelson Dale Group, Inc. (TNDG) Real Estate Market Report ................ 38
List of Figures
Figure 1-1: Project Area Map .........................................................................................................................................................
8
List of Tables
Table 1-1: Project Land Uses ............................................................................................................................................................
6
Table 3-1: Significance Threshold Criteria and Methodology ......................................................................................... 21
Table 3-2: VMT Thresholds of Significance Evaluation Method ..................................................................................... 22
Table 3-3: VMT Thresholds of Significance as Defined in SB 743 Guidelines ........................................................... 22
Table 3-4: Project VMT Metrics .................................................................................................................................................... 24
Table 3-5: Project Preferred Road Section .............................................................................................................................. 27
Table 3-6: Medical Access to Centinela Hospital Medical Center .................................................................................. 30
List of Acronyms
ABM Activity-based model
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
BMP Bike Master Plan
CA California
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
DSP Downtown Specific Plan
DU Dwelling Unit
EIR Environmental Impact Report
ESFD El Segundo Fire Department
ESPD El Segundo Police Department
GHG Greenhouse Gas
KSF Thousand Square Feet
LA Los Angeles
LAX Los Angeles International Airport
MUTCD (California) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
OPR (California) Governor's Office of Planning Research
PCH Pacific Coast Highway (CA-1)
PPOP Plans, Programs, Ordinances and Policies
RTP/SCS Connect SoCal Regional Transportation Plan
SB 743 California Senate Bill 743
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SED Socioeconomic Data
TA Transportation Assessment
TAZ Transportation Analysis Zone
TDM Transportation Demand Management
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
VPD Vehicles per Day
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
1.Introduction
This report documents the assumptions, methodologies, and findings of a transportation analysis (TA)
conducted by Fehr & Peers to address the potential transportation impacts of theEl Segundo Downtown
Specific Plan Update (Project) in the City of El Segundo, California. The boundary of the Downtown
Specific Plan Area (Project Area) is shown in Figure 1-1. The Project is proposed to enable the buildout of
the Downtown Specific Plan area according to the land uses described in Table 1-1. The Project is also
proposed to include the conceptual mobility enhancements described in Chapter 3 of the Downtown
Specific Plan Update, Multimodal Mobility.
This TAwas conducted to support the analysis of transportation within an Environmental Impact Report
(EIR)under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)being preparedfor the Project, and to otherwise
meet City of El Segundo requirements in accordance with the City of El Segundo SB 743 Implementation
1
Guidelines.
1.1Project Description
The ProjectArea is approximately 43.8 acres in size and is in the northwest quadrant of the City of El
Segundo, which is approximately 20 miles southwest from downtown Los Angeles. The Project Area is
located southwest of the interchange of the Interstate 405 Freeway (I-405) and State Route 90 (Imperial
Highway), west of Pacific Coast Highway and north of El Segundo Boulevard. The Interstate 105 Freeway
(I-105) is north of the ProjectArea, immediately north of Imperial Highway. The Project Areais bounded
by MariposaAvenue to the north and El Segundo Boulevard to the south. Los Angeles International
Airport (LAX) is located to the north; the Los Angeles County community of Del Aire and the City of
Hawthorne are located to the east; the City of Manhattan Beach is located to the south; and the Hyperion
Sewage Treatment Plant, Dockweiler Beach, and Pacific Ocean are located to the west. Figure 1-1
illustrates the Project Area.
The Project proposes the following net-new land uses in the Project Area, through 2040:
Retail and Restaurant: 130,000 square feet
Office: 200,000 square feet
Medical Office: 24,000 square feet
Residential Units: 300 units
The existing, net new, and proposed buildout land use quantities through 2040 are described in Table
1-1.
1
City of El Segundo, SB 743 Implementation Guidelines, May2022, adopted September 2022.
5
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Table 1-1: Project Land Uses
Net New
1
Land UseUnits
(Through 2040)
2
Restaurant KSF35.21
2
Grocery KSF15.92
2
General Retail KSF51.51
2
Hardware/Auto Parts KSF3.00
2
Other Services KSF24.36
General Office KSF200.00
Medical Office KSF24.00
Residential DU300
1
KSF = Thousand Square Feet, DU = Dwelling Unit
2
The DSP Project Description describes a combined total of 130 KSF for retail and restaurant. Breakdown of specific uses was
estimated based on Table 1a and 1b in Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update (2022) report produced by The
Natelson Dale Group, Inc(TNDG).TNDGreport is attached to this TA as Appendix E.
The Project also proposesthe followingconceptual transportationnetworkenhancements, as described in
Chapter 3 of the Downtown Specific Plan Update, Multimodal Mobility(those listed as Area-wide are
proposed at various locations throughout the Project Area where necessary):
Pedestrian crossing enhancements at twelve (12) locations
Area-wide sidewalk ADA-compliant curb ramp enhancements
Bicycle mobility enhancements on two (2) roadway segments
Area-wide bicycle accommodation and wayfinding enhancements
Bus stop enhancements at six (6) existing bus stops
Signal operation enhancements at two (2) signalized intersections
Streetscape enhancements on two (2) roadway segments
Area-wide intersection control improvements (signage and striping)
In-road bollard receptacles for temporary street closures at two (2) locations
Area-wide on-street parking striping enhancements
Area-wide off-street parking optimization enhancements
The conceptual enhancementslisted above are further described in Section 3.3 of this TA. Chapter 3 of
the Downtown Specific Plan Update, Multimodal Mobility
6
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Because these alternative enhancements are not preferred design features ofthe Project, they are not
evaluatedfor impactsin this TA.
1.2Transportation Assessment Scope
The scope of work for this TA was determined in consultation with the City of El Segundoand is in
VMTthresholds of significance adopted in September 2022. The base
assumptions and technical methodologies were discussed with the City of El Segundoas part of the TA
approach.
The SB 743 Implementation Guidelinesestablishes an updated set of guidelines, methods, and impact
criteria for CEQA considerations that focus on vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Appendix G checklist poses questions 1,3, and 4in the below list.This TA investigates
the following questions in determining the potential for transportation-related impacts:
1.Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation
system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? (Plans, Programs, Ordinances
and Policies(PPOP)Review)
2.Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 subdivision
(b), (based on methodology at thresholds outlines in the City of El Segundo SB 743
Implementation Guidelines)? (Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis)
3.Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or
incompatible use? (Geometric HazardsReview)
4.Would the project result in inadequate emergency access?(Inadequate Emergency Access Review)
7
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
1.3Organization of this Transportation Assessment Report
This TA is divided into fourchapters, including this introduction, Chapter 1. Chapter 2 describes the
environmental setting and theexisting and cumulative conditions of the transportation system in the study
area, including an inventory of the streets, freeways, bicycle and pedestrian networks, and transit service.
The required CEQA analyses are summarized in Chapter 3
programs, ordinances, and policies, a VMT analysis, a geometric design hazards evaluation, and emergency
access evaluation. Chapter 4 contains the TA summary and conclusions.
Appendices to this TA include details of the technical analysis, as follows:
Appendix A-Preferred Roadway Sections includes illustrationsof the preferredconceptual
roadway infrastructure enhancements.
Appendix B-PPOP Review
plans, programs, ordinances, and policies.
Appendix CSEDTAZInputs forActivity-Based Model (ABM)contains the socio-economic
data (SED) inputs for the SCAG RTP/SCS Activity-Based Model (provided by SCAG)
Appendix DProject Area Existing Parcel Data contains the existing parcel data for the Project
Area(provided by the City)
Appendix EThe Natelson Dale Group, Inc. (TNDG) Real Estate Market Report contains the
-range Demand Projections for El Segundo
April2022
9
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
2.Environmental Setting
2.1Existing Conditions
Study Area
The approximately 43.8-acre Project Areais currently regulated by the 2000 City of El Segundo Downtown
Specific Plan, a regulatory document which the Project would replace. Existing land uses within the Project
Area include retail, restaurant, office, and residential. The existing land use parcel data for the Project Area
is attached to this report as Appendix D.The Project Area also includes various civic uses, such as El
Segundo City Hall, the El Segundo Police Department(ESPD)headquarters, and El Segundo Fire Department
(ESFD) Station#1. Because the Project Area defines specific boundaries within which Project land use
buildout and conceptual roadway enhancementsmay occur, the Study Area in this analysisis defined as the
Project Area, as shown in Figure 1-1.Thus, the terms Project Area and Study Area are used interchangeably
in this TA.
Existing Street System
Major streets serving the Project Areainclude El Segundo Boulevard,Grand Avenue, and Mariposa Avenue
in the east-west direction and Main Streetin the north-south direction. Regional access to the Project Site
is provided by I-105 (Glenn Anderson Freeway), I-405 (San Diego Freeway)and CA-1(Pacific Coast
Highway/Sepulveda Blvd), withthe nearestinterchange approximately 1mile to the northeast (I-105). Local
access to the Project Areais provided by several local streetsand avenues, listed below. Per the El Segundo
2
Circulation Element, the followinglist describesthe designation of the major streets located within or
directly adjacent to the Project Area:
El Segundo BoulevardSecondary Arterial(east of Main Street), 4-Lane Collector (west of Main
Street)
Grand AvenueSecondaryArterial
Mariposa Avenue2-Lane Collector (east of Main Street), Local Street (west of Main Street)
Main Street Secondary Arterial (south of Grand Avenue), 4-Lane Collector (north of Grand Avenue)
The City of El Segundo Circulation Element, defines the following street classifications:
Major Arterials
Major arterials function to connect traffic from collectors to themajor freeway system as well as
to provide access to adjacent landuses. They move large volumes of automobiles, trucks and
buses,and link the principal elements within the City to other adjacentregions. These facilities
handle inter-city and intra-city vehiculartrips in the magnitude of 40,000 to 75,000 vehicles per
2
City of El Segundo,City of El Segundo General Plan Circulation Element, September 2004
10
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
day (VPD).They should be planned for eight lanes of through traffic. In themajority of cases in El
Segundo, curb parking will be prohibitedduring peak periods. Bicycle traffic would travel with
vehicular flowor be separated by a path behind the curb. Raised medians can beused to separate
opposing flows of vehicular traffic as necessary.Access points, (i.e., driveways and minor
intersecting streets) shouldbe minimized.
Separate left-turnlanes at major signalized intersections would bemandatory with double left-
turnlanes the rule rather than theexception. Separate right-turnlanes which also serve as bus
loadingareas would be considered at locations indicating high tum volumes.At some
intersections up to three left turn and up to two right turnlanes may be provided, if needed, and
if acquisition of additionalright-of-way is practical.
Secondary Arterials
Secondary arterials are similar to major arterials in function. Theyconnect traffic from collectors to
the major freeway system. Theymove large volumes of automobiles, trucks and buses, and link
theprincipal elements within the City to other adjacent regions. Thesestreets handle intra-city
trips in the magnitude of 25,000 to 55,000VPDand are not as continuous in length as major
arterials. At leastsix through lanes should be provided to handle these needs alongwith single or
double left-tum lanes (the latter preferably) at majorsignalized intersections. Curb parking would
be prohibited duringpeak periods. Bicycle traffic would have to use paths behind thecurb,
separate bicycle lanes, or travel in the street with autos, trucksand buses.
Collector Streets
The collector street is intended to serve as an intermediate route tohandle traffic between local
streets and arterials. In addition,collector streets provide access to abutting property. Collector
streets are anticipated to carry traffic volumes between 15,000 to40,000 VPDand serve important
internal functions within thecommunity. A collector street may have one through lane per
direction; but more realistically, it should have a minimum of twothrough lanes (at least during
peak periods). In some cases, a 4-lanecollector may have a median divider. Curb parking can be
accommodated if abutting property owners have insufficient off-streetparking. The function of
the collector, however, is to "collect"vehicles from the local street system and transport them to
thearterial system as efficiently as possible.
Signalization of collector/local street intersections should be timed topermit the majority of the
traffic flow on the collector while allowinglocal street access. Restriction of free flow along
collectors due tounwarranted stopcontrols should be discouraged.
Local Streets
Local streets principally provide vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycleaccess to property abutting the
public right-of-way. Cross sections oflocal streets vary, depending on the abutting land uses,
parkingrequirements, street trees, and other considerations.Where both sidesof the street are
served equally in residential areas, the commonright-of-way width for a local street is 60 feet
with a 36-footpavement width.
11
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
In multi-family areas where there is continuous parking throughoutthe day, a minimum of 40 feet
of pavement may be required toprovide room for two moving lanes of traffic in addition to street
parking on both sides. In commercial and industrial areas, aminimum pavement width of 40 feet
is considered necessary. Inindustrial areas, consideration of the predominant type of trucking,
and whether or not maneuvering of trailers must be provided, mayrequire a pavement width of
more than 44 feet.
When pavement widths exceed 40 feet on local streets, rights-of-wayshould be increased above
60 feet. Each parkway width should be 12feet, including landscaped area and sidewalk. Sidewalk
width shouldbe 4 feet in residential areas and 5 feet in commercial or industrialareas.
The overall system design of local streets can greatly affect traffic.Unduly long streets build up
traffic volumes and act as collectors.Cross streets and intersections with acute angles are likely to
contribute to accidents. Good practice precludes carrying localstreets into arterials since such
intersections create unnecessaryfriction points and cause related congestion on the arterials. A
farbetter approach is to bring local streets into collectors which thenfeed into arterials.
Described below are the primary freewayand roadways that provide regional and local access to the Project
Area.
Freeways
I-105 (Glenn Anderson Freeway) is orientedin the east-west direction located north of the Project.
Nearthe Project Area, I-105 provides three lanes in each direction. I-105 terminates onto Imperial
Highway, providing access to the Project Area.
I-405(San DiegoFreeway)is anorth-southfreewaylocated eastof the Project. Located about 2.5
miles fromthe Project Area, I-405provides five to sixlanes in each direction. Access to the Project
Area isprovidedvia on and off-ramps to El Segundo Boulevard.
East West Streets
Roadways located within or adjacent to the Project Area:
El Segundo Boulevard is designated as a Secondary Arterial (east of Main Street)anda 4-Lane
Collector (west of Main Street)anddefines a portion of the southern boundary of the Project Area.
El Segundo Boulevardprovides two travel lanes in each direction. El Segundo Boulevard provides
access to and from I-405, which is approximately 2.5 miles east of the Project Area.
Grand Avenue is designated as a Secondary Arterial and bisects the Project Area east-west. Grand
Avenue provides access to the Vista Del Mar, west of the Project Area. Grand Avenue includes two
travellanesin each direction with parking permitted on both sides of the streetand both sides of
the median. (shared vehicle-bicycle lane marking)bicycle route.
Grand Avenue is a dedicated truck route, and the speed limit is 25 mph.
Mariposa Avenue is designated as a 2-Lane Collector (east of Main Street)and aLocal Street (west
of Main Street)and forms portions of the northern boundary of the Project Area. Mariposa Avenue
provides one travel lane in each direction, with parking on some segments.
12
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Roadways that provide local and regional access to the Project Area:
Imperial Highway is designated as a Secondary Arterialoriented east-west andis located
approximately 0.9miles north of the Project Area. Imperial Highway provides two travel lanes in
each direction and features Class II bicycle lanes.Northeast of the Project Area, Imperial Highway
provides access to and from I-105.
North South Streets
Roadways located within or adjacent to the Project Area:
Main Street is designated as aSecondary Arterial (south of Grand Avenue)and a 4-Lane Collector
(north of Grand Avenue)and serves as the primary north-south thoroughfare through the Project
Area. Main Street is the center of commercial activity in the Project Area. Main Street provides two
. Main Street provides access to and
from Imperial Highway to the north and El Segundo Boulevard to the south. The speed limit on
Main Street is 25 miles per hour (mph). South of Grand Avenue, Main Street is a truck route, as
defined in the General Plan Circulation Element, which is noted by signage.
South of Holly Avenue, Main Street can accommodate in-road bollards for temporary
street closures. Bollards can be mounted in the permanent in-road receptacles to
temporarily close approximately 340 feet of Main Street for special events, such as
the farme
Roadways that provide local and regional access to the Project Area:
CA-1 (Pacific Coast Highway, PCH, Sepulveda Boulevard)is designated as a Major Arterialand
is located approximately one mile east of the Project Area. PCH provides four travel lanes in each
direction and serves as access to I-105, LAX, and neighboring cities to the south of El Segundo.
Vista Del Mar is designated asaSecondaryArterial, locatedapproximately two-thirds of a mile
west of the Project Area. Vista Del Mar provides two travel lanes in each direction and serves as the
major coastal thoroughfarethrough El Segundo. From the Project Area directly, access to Vista Del
Mar is only provided via Grand Avenue.
Intersection Control
There are three signalized intersections in the Project Area: Main Street and Mariposa Avenue; Main Street
and Holly Avenue; and at Main Street and Grand Avenue. All other intersections include one of the
following control types:
All-way stop control, in which vehicles on all approaches must stop.
Side-street stop control, in which vehicles on side-street approaches must stop, while vehicles on
major road approaches do not.
13
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
The Project Area includes an extensive alleyway network, which provides access to off-street parking,
business access, and truck circulation. Most intersections between alleyways and roadways are side-street
stop-controlled, though many lack advance stop bars on the alley approach, which can increase right-of-
way confusion and cause conflicts with cross-traffic pedestrians, bicyclists, or vehicles.
14
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Existing Public Transit
The Project Area is served by Beach Cities Transit and City of El Segundo Transportation. Below is a list of
the bus routes that provide service to and within the Project Area:
Beach Cities Transit Line 109
Line 109 connects LAX and Torrance via El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, and
Redondo Beach. In Downtown El Segundo, this line utilizesalong Main Street and Grand Avenue.
This line has headways of 40-50 minutes during weekdays.
Lunchtime Shuttle
Lunchtime Shuttle services were suspended during the COVID-19 pandemic and had not resumed
as of Winter 2023. Previously, the City of El Segundo Transportation Lunchtime Shuttle operated
on a continuous loop between Downtown El Segundo and the Smoky Hollowarea to the east
from 11:45 to 2pm on weekdays.
Beach Shuttle
Following suspended service during the COVID-19 pandemic, the City partnered with Swoop, Inc.
to resume Beach Shuttle service for the 2022 summer season. The Beach Shuttle operates
between El Segundo and El Porto Beach during the El Segundo Unified School District summer
break. There are several stops located near the Project Area.
Dial-a-Ride
The City currently operates Dial-a-Ride service in partnership with Lyft. This serviceprimarily
focuses on enhancing accessibility for seniors and disabled residents. The service operates on
weekdays and serves the entirety of the Project Area.
15
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
Bicycle Facilities
Main Street and Grand Avenue currently providebicyclefacilities in the Project Area. These roadwaysare
designated asClass III bicycle routes with on-,
for their full extents within the Project Area.
Pedestrian Facilities
Currently, pedestrian facilities are provided throughout the Project Area, including sidewalks on all streets,
and marked crosswalks at both intersections and at some midblock locations. There are four midblock
crosswalks, all located on Main Street, which feature pedestrian-activated in-road flashing lights,
crosswalk signs, and yield paddles. These midblock crossings lack crosswalk lines, which reduces their
visibility to drivers.
While some intersection pedestrian crossings in the Project Area feature ADA-compliant curb ramps with
truncated domes, most lack these accessibility enhancements. Additionally, most crosswalks lack edge
lines and striping. Both signalized intersections inthe Project Area do not provide pedestrian countdown
on the signal heads.
16
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
2.2Cumulativewith ProjectConditions
To develop the Cumulative with Project Conditions, theresidential and employment effects ofthe net-new
land use quantities described in Table 1-1 were incorporated into the Activity-Based Model (ABM.)The
ABM methodology used to develop the VMT analysis is further described in Section 3.2 of this TA. Also
considered in the Cumulative with Project Condition are the effects of the preferred roadway cross sections
Table 3-5 as they relate to the number of vehicular travel lanes.
3
The Smoky Hollow Specific PlanArea is located to the east of the Project Area.As defined by the City of El
Segundo, the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan provides a framework and long-term strategy to guide public and
private investment in the Smoky Hollow area. As portions of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan are inthe same
transportation analysis zones (TAZs)as the Project Area, the analysis in thisTA includes the employment
growth projections defined withinthe Smoky Hollow Specific Plan.The inclusion of the Smoky Hollow
Specific plan as a related project allows for the evaluation of trip generation and attraction interaction
between the Project itself and the related project and any associated effectson trip length.
3
Smoky Hollow Specific Plan, City of El Segundo, 2018.
17
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
3.CEQA Transportation Assessment
year
2040conditionin which the Project Area is built-out to reflect the land use quantities enabledby the
Project, as described in Table 1-1,the preferred conceptual roadway cross sections described in Table
3-5, and the recommended general transportation network enhancements described in Section 3.3. The
analysis of the construction phases of future development, roadway design, and infrastructure
enhancements would be assessed during the reviewin the future with each individualdevelopment
projectenabled by this planor roadway improvement implementation, when the actual construction
methods and approaches are known. Due to the programmatic nature of the Project, a detailed
construction analysis isnot included in this TA.
3.1Plans, Programs, Ordinances and Policies(PPOP)Review
1.Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation
system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
The purpose of this section is to determine whether the Project conflicts with a transportation-related City
plan, program, ordinance, orpolicy that was adopted to protect the environment.A project would not be
shown to result in an impact merely based on whether a project would not implement an adopted plan,
program, ordinance,or policy. Rather, it is the intention of this threshold test to ensure that proposed
development does not conflict with nor preclude the City from implementing adopted plans, programs,
ordinances,or policies.Furthermore, under CEQA, a project is considered consistent with an applicable plan
if it is consistent with the overall intent of the plan and would not preclude the attainment of its primary
goals. A project does not need to be in perfect conformity with each and every policy. Finally, any
inconsistency with an applicable policy, plan, or regulation is only a significant impact under CEQA if the
policy, plan, or regulation wereadopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect
and if the inconsistency itself would result in a direct physical impact on the environment.
This evaluation involved review ofCity documents includingthe SCAG RTP/SCS, City of El Segundo General
Plan Circulation Element and the South Bay Bicycle Master Plan.
The Southern California Associationof Governments (SCAG)updates its long-range (i.e., minimum
4
20 years) Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS)every
2045
purposes; the plan in its entirety was formally adopted in September2020.
4
-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy of The Southern
California Association of Governments, September 2020
18
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
The SCS is a required element of the RTP that provides a plan for meeting GHG
emissions reduction targets set forth by the CARB. It provides growth forecasts that
are used in the development of air quality-related land use and transportation control
strategies by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). California
8% by 2020 and 19% by 2035 relative to the 2005 baseline. Successfully meeting
these targets will require substantial effort to reduce VMT. The 202045 RTP/SCS calls
for investing $638 billion over the 25-year term of the plan toward over 4,000
transportation projects, all of which collectively are expected to result in a 5%
reduction in daily VMT per capita and a more than 25% decrease in traffic delay per
capita. Investments will focus on maintaining and better managing the existing
transportation network, expanding mobility choices, and increasing investment in
transit and complete streets.
Of the ten goals presented in the 20202045 RTP/SCS, the following five are
applicable to transportation:
Goal 2: Improve mobility, accessibility, reliability, and travel safety for people and
goods.
Goal 3: Enhance the preservation, security, and resilience of the regional
transportation system.
Goal 4: Increase person and goods movement and travel choices within the
transportation system.
Goal 7: Adapt to a changing climate and support an integrated regional
development pattern and transportation network.
Goal 8: Leverage new transportation technologies and data-driven solutions that
result in more efficient travel.
As a land use plan that enables infill development, densification of land uses, and
multimodal mobility improvements, the Project is consistent with the RTP/SCS and
would not preclude any of Goals 2, 3, 4, 7, or 8 from being realized.
5
City of El Segundo General Plan Circulation Element(Circulation Element)is intended to
fficient circulation system. The Circulation
Element includes a Master Plan of Streets and an Alternative Modes of Travel section, and defines
goals, objectives, and policies related to transportation.The Project is consistent with the
reviewed policies of the Circulation Element. See Appendix B, for a detailed review of consistency
with relevant policies intheCirculation Element.
6
South Bay Bicycle Master Plan(BMP)is intended to guide the development and maintenance
of a comprehensive bicycle network and set of programs and policies throughout the cities of El
Segundo, Gardena, Hermosa Beach, Lawndale, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, and Torrance
through 2031.Chapter 2 of the BMP defines goals, objectives, and policy actions, and Chapter 3of
5
City of El Segundo, City of El Segundo General Plan Circulation Element, September 2004
6
South Bay Bicycle Master Plan Draft Final Plan, August 2011
19
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
the BMPincludes proposed bicycle facilities for the City of El Segundo specifically. The Project is
consistent with the reviewed policies of the Circulation Element.See Appendix B for a detailed
review of consistency with relevant policies in the BMP.
20
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
3.2Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis
2.Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 subdivision
(b), (based on methodology at thresholds outlinedin the City of El Segundo SB 743
Implementation Guidelines)?
7
TheCity of El SegundoSB 743ImplementationGuidelinesdefine two metrics for determining thresholds
of significance efficiency and net change. Table 3-1 describes the efficiency and net change metrics and
allowable methods, directly according to the SB 743 Guidelines.
Table 3-1: Significance Threshold Criteria and Methodology
Threshold BasisEfficiencyNet Change
Residential, Professional OfficeRetail, Hotel, Sports Venue
Example Land Use
Industrial
Example VMT
1
VMT per service populationRegion VMT change
Thresholds
Customer
NoYes
Component
Non-Significant Screening Criteria,Non-Significant Screening Criteria, Travel
Allowable Methods The City of El Segundo Sketch Planning Tool, Demand Model
Travel Demand Model
Source: City of El Segundo, SB 743 Implementation Guidelines, May 2022, adopted September 2022.
1
Service population is defined as the sum of population (capita) and employees of a given geography
The SB 743 Guidelines-typical land use projects, the project applicant will need
to work with the City to determine which metric and methodology should be used for analyzing the
As the Project includes a considerable increase in various land use quantities, as
defined in Table 1-1, whichwould represent most of the employment in the ProjectTAZin 2040,
utilization of a travel demand model(SCAG RTP/SCS Activity-Based Model \[ABM\])was determined to be
themostappropriate methodology. Preparation of the ABM for the analysis in this TA involved
coordination with City staff, including the confirmation of existing land use data within the Project Area
and employment growth within the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan Area, a related project.
The ABM simulates daily activities and travel patterns of all individuals in the region, as affected by
8
transportation system conditions. All vehicle-trips are traced to the zone or zones of study. This includes
internal to internal, internal to external, and external to internal trips. These modeled trips are used to
7
City of El Segundo, SB 743 Implementation Guidelines, May 2022, adopted September 2022.
8
Southern California Association of Governments, 2016 Regional Travel Demand Model and Model Validation, 2020.
21
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Impact Criteria
arespecified in the SB 743 Guidelines. The threshold of significance evaluation
method is defined by land use, as noted in Table 3-2.
Table 3-2: VMT Thresholds of Significance Evaluation Method
Land Use Threshold of Significance Evaluation Method
1
Residential The existing daily VMT per service population for the City of ElSegundo based on data from Replica
1
Office The existing daily VMT per service population for the City of El Segundo based on data from Replica
Retail Net increase in total daily VMT
Source: City of El Segundo, SB 743 Implementation Guidelines, May 2022, adopted September 2022.
1
The data source known as Replica, which was utilized for the SB 743 Guidelines development, is further described below in the
Vehicle Miles Traveled Baseline section.
Utilizing the threshold of significance evaluationmethoddescribed in Table 3-2, the SB 743 Guidelines
define the following thresholds of significance:
Table 3-3: VMT Thresholds of Significanceas Defined in SB 743 Guidelines
1
Land UseVMT ThresholdBasis and Data Source
24. 5 VMT/ Service The existing VMT per service population for City of El Segundo based
Residential
Populationon data from Replica
24. 5 VMT/ Service The existing VMT per service population for the City of El Segundo
Office
Populationbased on data from Replica
Using the City of El Segundo as the basis and Replica as the data
Retail Net regional change
source
Other 24. 5 VMT/ Service The existing VMT per service population for the City of El Segundo
Employment Populationbased on data from Replica
Using the City of El Segundo as the basis and Replica as the data
Other Customer Net regional change
source
Source: City of El Segundo, SB 743 Implementation Guidelines, May 2022, adopted September 2022.
1
As discussed in Vehicle Miles Traveled Baseline(below), the threshold used for this analysis was modified to maintain consistency
with the 2040 with Project scenario using travel demand modeling. The values in this table are provided for informational purposes
-based threshold.
Vehicle Miles Traveled Baseline
The VMT per service population baseline described in Table 3-3 is based on Replica data from 2019, as
9
. As described in the SB 743 Guidelines, Replica
uses anonymized cell phone data combined with othersources of location-based data such as credit card
. Discussed earlier in this section, the most appropriate evaluation for the
Project was determined to be a travel demand model, which differs from Replica data. For consistency in
9
City of El Segundo, SB 743 Implementation Guidelines, May 2022, adopted September 2022.
22
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
methodology between the Project and baseline VMT per service population establishment, the ABM was
utilized to produce an, replacing the nominal 24.5CitywideVMT/SP
.
(2023) scenario was developed using land use data obtained from the City,
allowing a more precise depiction of land use within the Project Area and surrounding areas compared to
that produced in SCAG regional population projections, which is typically used to informABM inputsif
more granular data arenot available. Theexisting land use data is included as Appendix D to this TA. The
existing land usedatawereconverted to population and employment byindustrysector using factors
10
defined in the City of Los Angeles VMT Calculator Documentation. The City of LA VMT Calculator
Documentation includes nationally and regionally-researched land use and transportation data sources
for conversion rate developmentspecific to southern California. The specific source of each conversion
rate is cited in that document. The resulting SED that was input into the ABM for the existing without
Project scenario is included in Appendix C.
As a regional and long-term transportation forecasting tool with millions of people and transportation
network data inputs, an ABM network does not exist for each and everypossible scenario year. Such is the
case for the year 2023; thus, the ABM 2016 scenario was utilized to produce an initial VMT metricfor
baseline establishment. To produce a metric for the year 2023, linear interpolation was utilized based on
the trend line between model years 2016 and 2045, using ABM outputs obtained directly from SCAG.
Based on this methodology, the VMT per service population(VMT/SP)in 2023for theCity of El Segundo
was26.2VMT/SP.Service population is defined as the sum of population (capita) and employees of a
given geography. Thismetric of 26.2VMT/SP wasutilized as the residential and office land use VMT
impact thresholdforthe Project(TAZ)
higher than the establishedCitybaseline, then there is a significant transportation impact. If it islower,
there is not a significant impactbased on this metric.
Asimilar interpolation methodology was utilized to determine the Citywide total daily VMT baseline,
which definesthe threshold metric for retail projects.If the Project results in a net increase in total daily
Citywide VMT, then there is a significant impact based ontheretail VMT metric. If the Project does not
result in a net increase in total daily Citywide VMT, there is not a significant impact based on thatmetric.
trips. Given that the Project enables buildout of multiple land uses within a defined geography, including
residential, office, and retail, the Project was evaluated for transportation impact based on both VMT per
service population of the TAZ and based on a net increase in total daily Citywide VMT.
Impact Analysis
SB 743 Guidelines, VMT per service populationand total daily Citywide VMT metrics were
developed asinitially described in Table 3-3 and further explained in the Vehicle Miles Traveled Baseline
10
City of Los Angeles VMT Calculator Documentation, Version 1.3, May 2020.
23
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
section earlier in this chapter. The analysis in this TA utilized the SCAG RTP/SCS ABM for scenario years 2016
without Project, with outputs interpolated to 2023to produce the Baseline,and 2045with Project,
a similar interpolationmethodology to that
described in Vehicle Miles Traveled Baseline.
Socioeconomic data (SED) for the ABM was obtained from SCAG and updated for the Project Area TAZ
based on existing parcel data provided by the City and Project buildout through 2040.Theadjacent TAZs
in which the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan (related project) is locatedwere modified based on the
11
employment projectionsdescribed in that plan.
The VMT/SP for the Project TAZ was calculated to be 24.6, which is lower than the 2023baseline of 26.2,
evidenceof a less than significant impact to VMTfor residential or office projects. The total daily Citywide
VMT in 2040 is estimated to be 1,716,136, which is lower than the 2023Baselineof 1,739,658, evidenceof
a less than significant impact for retail projects. Thesedeterminationsaresummarized in Table 3-4.
Table 3-4: Project VMT Metrics
2023VMT/SP (City 2040 VMT/SP (Project TAZ Impact Significant
Geography
Baseline)with Project)DeterminationImpact?
Project TAZ HigherVMT/SP
26.224.6No
21115000 than baseline?
2023Total Daily VMT 2040 Total Daily VMT (with Impact Significant
Geography
(Baseline)Project)DeterminationImpact?
Net increasein
Citywide 1,739,6581,716,136Citywide Total No
Daily VMT?
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2023
Summary
The analysis conducted demonstrates that under the current City VMT methodology, the Project would
result in less than significant impacts on VMT. See Appendix C for additional information about the inputs
and supporting documentation for the VMT analysis.
11
Smoky Hollow Specific Plan, City of El Segundo, 2018.
24
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
3.3Geometric HazardsReview
3.Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or
incompatible use?
This sectionincludes a discussion ofimpacts regarding the potential for an increase of hazards due to a
geometric design feature that generally relates to the design of access points to,from, and withinthe Project
Areaand may include safetyoroperationalimpacts.
3.3.1Proposed Pedestrian Network
Less than significant impact.
The Project proposes the following enhancements to the pedestrian network in the Project Area:
General Pedestrian Enhancements
Add mirrors to parking structure, driveway, and alleyway exits to increase the visibility of
approaching pedestrians.
Remove sidewalk obstructions or re-route around obstructions, such as trees, to increase
accessibility, especially for those usingwheeled devices.
Upgrade curb cuts at driveways and alleyways to ADA-compliant curb ramps to improve
accessibility for those using mobility devices.
Widen sidewalks on Main Street, Grand Avenue, and Richmond Street segments, according to
preferred road sections discussedin Section 3.3.3 of this TA.
Midblock Crosswalks
Install pedestrian signals to better alert drivers to crossing pedestrians and encourage signal
compliance.
Install raised crosswalks for better visibility and awareness of crossing pedestrians.
Stripe crosswalks with high-visibility continental-style striping to increase their visibility or, at
minimum, stripe crosswalk edge-lines to meet California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Device (MUTCD) standards.
To better serve users with mobility challenges, upgrade ramps to meet ADA compliance by
adding truncated domes, modifying pedestrian push button locations relative to the ramp, and
providing audible push buttons.
Controlled Intersection Crosswalks
Upgrade curb ramps to meet ADA compliance by adding truncated domes and modifying
pedestrian push buttons.
25
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Crosswalks shall provide decorative paving or continental style striping to increase their visibility.
At a minimum, the crosswalk edge-lines shall be striped to meet California Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Device (MUTCD) standards.
Atsignalized intersections, install pedestrian countdown heads to meet current standards and
inform pedestrians of the remaining walk time available.
Ensure that pedestrian signals comply with current MUTCD pedestrian clearance time standards,
with a standard walking speed of 3.5 feet per second.
The above listed pedestrian network enhancements should be designed and constructed to conform to
the latest MUTCD design standards at the individual element implementation level. These enhancements
would generally improve pedestrian access and comfortability and should be designedas to not
introduce geometric design hazards; thus, the pedestrian network enhancements wouldhave no
significant impactunder this impact criterion
3.3.2Proposed Bicycle Network
Less than significant impact.
The Project proposes the roadway cross sections for Main Street and Grand Avenue as described in Table
3-5. The preferred roadway cross sections include a Class III shared bicycle routeon
Grand Avenue, which currently exists on the corridor, and a Class II bicycle lane on Main Street. The
proposed bicycle lane on Main Street would provide greaterhorizontalseparationand additional striping
between vehicles and cyclists than the Class III bicycle route which currently exists on the corridor. Upon
final engineering designof the proposed roadway sections, the bicycle facilitiesshould be signed and
striped according to MUTCD standards, as to not introduce geometric design hazards; thus, the preferred
bicycle network wouldhave a less than significantimpactunder this impact criterion.
3.3.3Proposed Roadway Sections
Less than significant impact.
The Project proposes modified roadway cross sections for Main Street, Grand Avenue, and Richmond
Street. The preferred cross sections are illustrated in Appendix A and are summarized qualitatively in
Table 3-5.
26
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Table 3-5:Project Preferred Road Section
Approximate Existing Typical Preferred Typical
RoadGeometric Hazard Impact
11
ExtentsSectionSection
15outdoor
dining/sidewalks (both
Generally,improves pedestrian
sides)
sides)
and cyclistcomfort
parking (both
All sidewalks, parking lanes,
El Segundo Blvd to sides)
(both sides)
Main Street travel lanes, bicycle facilities to
Mariposa Ave
be designed to MUTCD
direction)standards
(two each direction)
Two 11 Less than significant impact
each direction)
outdoor Generally,improves pedestrian
sides)dining/sidewalks (both comfort
sides)
Back-in angled parking to
(both sides of street back-reduce modal conflicts
Grand Standard St to
and median)in, both sides)
All sidewalks, parking lanes,
Avenue Concord St
Four travel lanes, bicycle facilities to
(two each direction) each direction) with be designed to MUTCD
standards
Less than significant impact
8-
sides)
Generally,improves pedestrian
19outdoor
parking comfort
dining/sidewalks (both
Grand Ave to (one side, front-in)
Richmond All sidewalks and travel lanes to
sides)
north of Franklin
Street be designed to MUTCD
AveTwo 11travel lanes (one
(one side)standards
each direction)
Less than significant impact
(one each direction)
Source: Fehr & Peers and RRM Design Group, 2023
1
Dimensions are approximate. Exacts dimensions to be determined during engineering design
3.3.4Proposed Vehicular Circulation Enhancements
Less than significant impact.
The Project proposes the following enhancements to the vehicular network in the Project Area:
Protected left turn phases could be added in all directions at the intersection of Main Street and
Grand Avenue to reduce left turn conflicts with oncoming vehicles and pedestrians in the adjacent
crosswalk.
27
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
All side-street stop-controlledintersections should include stop signs and stop bars on the
controlled approaches to reduce right-of-way confusion.
These enhancements would generally reduce the potential for vehicle conflicts andshould be designed
according to MUTCD standards as to not introduce geometric design hazards; thus, the vehicularnetwork
enhancements wouldhave a less than significant impact.
3.3.5Proposed Public Transit Amenities
Less than significant impact.
The Project proposes the following enhancements to the bus stops in the Project Area:
Provide transit shelters at Project Areabus stops, where space allows. Transit shelters could be
designed to reflect City or Downtown community aesthetic desires.
At a minimum, include a bench and waste bin at each bus stop.
Increase bus zone length by extending red curb at stops, to at least 35 feet where feasible.
These enhancements would provide greater rider comfort and reduce the potential for bus-vehicle
conflicts. Transit stop enhancementsshould be designed according to MUTCD standards as to not
introduce geometric design hazards; thus, the transit amenity enhancements wouldhave a less than
significant impact.
3.3.6Proposed Parking Enhancements
Less than significant impact.
The Project proposes the followingphysicalparking enhancements in the Project Area:
On-Street Parking
Stripe all available parallel parking spaces with delineation lines to minimize inefficient parking
behavior and draw attention to available spaces.
Re--
while exiting parking spaces
Off-Street Parking
Installincreased parking wayfinding signage on streets adjacent to public parking structures or
online parking maps.
Install signage on the Richmond Street and Marketplace Alley entrances to the parking structure
that directs drivers searching for public parking to the Grand Avenue entrance.
existing supply.
28
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Encourage or require subterranean garages for larger new development that arefor office or
residential use only.
Further analyze the feasibility of new parking structures at the northeast corner of Richmond
Street and Franklin Avenue and at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Standard Street to
increase off-street parking supply buffer to support future development and growth in activity
levels within the Project Area.
These enhancements should be designed according to MUTCD standards as to not introduce geometric
design hazards; thus, the parking enhancements are concluded to have a less than significant impact.
3.3.7Proposed Placemaking Enhancements
Less than significant impact.
The Project proposes the following placemaking enhancementson Richmond Street (between Grand
Avenue and north of Franklin Street)in the Project Area:
Install in-road bollard receptacles at both ends of the segment, similar to those on Main Street, to
allow ongoing temporary closures, while maintaining vehicle access during non-event periods.
Thisenhancement would provide greater pedestriancomfort than existing conditions. Finalengineering
design ofthis placemaking enhancementshould be according to MUTCD standards as to not introduce
geometric design hazards; thus, the placemakingenhancements are concluded to have a less than
significant impact.
3.4Inadequate Emergency Access Review
4.Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? (Inadequate Emergency Access)
This section includes a discussion of theimpacts regarding the potential for inadequate emergency access
resulting from the Project, with individual analyses of Medical, Fire, and Police access.As described in
Table 3-5, the Project includes roadway section modifications on Main Street, Grand Avenue, and
Richmond Street. The preferred sections for Main Street and Grand Avenue would both result in a
reduction in the number of travel lanes from two lanes in each direction to onelanein each direction. As
most streets within and surrounding the Project Area consist of one travel lane in each direction, including
Mariposa Avenue, Franklin Avenue, and Maple Avenue, this preferred roadway section would not present
unusual driving conditions for the area. Furthermore, relatively frequent side-streets, driveways, and
alleyways (approximately every 150-460 feet) would continue to provide opportunities for vehicles to pull
over and allow the passage of emergency vehicles, despite the reduction in number of travel lanes.
If the signals at the intersections of Main Street and Grand Avenue and Main Street and Mariposa Avenue
are upgraded as described in Section 3.3.4, emergency vehicle preemption should be included as a
project design featureduring the planning and implementation of that specific improvement.
29
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
3.4.1Emergency Medical Access
Less than Significant Impact
The most proximate hospital with an emergency room totheProject Area is Centinela Hospital Medical
Center in Inglewood, 6.5miles to the northeast. Table 3-6 summarizes two typical routes between the
Project Area (defined as the intersection of Concord Streetand Grand Avenue, the westernmost
intersection in the Project Area), the distance and approximate peak hour travel timebetween the Project
Area and Centinela Hospital Medical Center, and the portion of that distance and travel time that would
occur on a street segment with a lane reduction withthe preferred roadway sections (either Main Street
or Grand Avenue).
Table 3-6: Medical Access to Centinela Hospital Medical Center
Existing Typical Travel
Typical Existing Typical Travel
Distance on Time on Segment
Total Peak Hour Time on Route with Similar
Major RouteReduced-Lane Proposedto Have
DistanceTravel Existing Geometry to
Segment Reduced Number of
1 1,3
Time PreferredRoad Sections
1
Travel Lanes
(North) Grand
Ave, Main St,
2
6.5 miles0.3 miles16-35 min3 min3 min
Imperial Hwy, I-
105
(South) Grand
Ave, Main St, El
3
6.5 miles0.2 miles14-35 min3 min2 min
Segundo Blvd, I-
405
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2023
1st
Typical Peak Hour Travel time is at 5:00 pm. This time
estimate is for privatevehicles that would be subject to queuing and red-lights, which emergency vehicles cantypicallybypass or
proceed through.
2
Similar geometry route consists of Concord Street to Mariposa Avenue, both streetshave one lane in each direction
33
Similar geometry routes consists of Concord Street and El Segundo Boulevard, both of which have one lane in each direction
Routeswith similar existing geometryare those which have the same number of travel lanes as Grand Avenue and Main Street
would have following implementation of the improvements described above in section 3.3.3, Proposed Roadway Sections. These
routes are assumed to have a similar travel time per distance as Grand Avenue and Main Streetwould havefollowing
implementation.
For the north route to Centinela Hospital Medical Center(via I-105), typically about three minutes of the
roadway sections.Utilizing a similar route, of only two-lane (one each direction)roadways, via Concord
Street and Mariposa Avenue instead of Grand Avenue and Main Street, the travel timeis also three
minutes.
For the south route to Centinela Hospital Medical Center(via I-405) typically, about three minutes of the
usual 1435-minute travel time on this route would occur on a street with a lane reduction under the
Utilizing a similar route, of only
30
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
two-lane (one each direction)roadways, via Concord Street and El Segundo Boulevard instead of Grand
Avenue and Main Street, the travel time is also three minutes.Additionally, should the modified roadway
cross sections on Grand Avenue and Main Street be considered undesirable for emergency medical
vehicle travel, the similar routes discussed above could serve as alternate routes to the nearest emergency
room.
This comparison, for both the north and south routes to Centinela Hospital Medical Centerindicates that
the emergency vehicle access would remain similarto the existing condition. Thus,a less than significant
impact of the lane reduction on emergencymedicalvehicle accessin the Project Areais expected.
3.4.2Emergency Fire Access
Less than Significant Impact
The preferred roadway sections for Main Street and Grand Avenue should be designed to allow fire
vehicle access to hydrants, with accompanying striping and signage where necessary.
There is currently an El Segundo Fire Department(ESFD)Station (Station #1) located within the Project
Area, with a driveway located approximately 200 feet north of the intersection of Main Street and Grand
Avenue. Followingthe evaluation fromthe Emergency Medical Access determination discussed above,
emergency vehicle travel time from Station #1 to any point within the Project Area is expected to be
similar with the preferred roadway sections on Main Street and Grand Avenue as it is currently.Thus, a
less than significant impact is expected for Emergency Fire Access.
3.4.3Police Access
Less than Significant Impact
The El Segundo Police Department (ESPD) Headquarters is currently located within the Project Area.
Following reasoning from the Emergency Medical Access and Emergency Fire Access determinations
discussed above, emergency vehicle travel time from the ESPD Headquarters to any point within the
Project Area is expected to be similar with the preferred roadway sections on Main Street and Grand
Avenue as it is currently. Thus, a less than significant impact is expected for Police Access.
31
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
4.Summary and Conclusions
The proposed Project is estimated to result in a less than significant transportation impact based on
methodology and thresholds established in the El Segundo SB 743 Implementation Guidelines. This
determination is summarized by CEQA Appendix G checklist itembelow:
4.1.1Plans, Programs, Ordinances and Policies (PPOP)Summary
1.Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation
system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
Evaluation
Includes review of following City-adopted documents:
SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy
City of El Segundo General Plan Circulation Element
South Bay Bicycle Master Plan
Determination
Less than significant impact. This determination is further discussed in Section 3.1 of this TA and the
full PPOP analysis is documented in Appendix B.
4.1.2VMT Summary
2.Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 subdivision
(b), (based on methodology at thresholds outlines in the City of El Segundo SB 743
Implementation Guidelines)?
Evaluation
Includes estimation of the following metrics:
VMT per service population compared to City threshold
Net change in regional daily VMT
Determination
Less than significant impact. TheVMT analysis methodology and findings are further discussed in
Section 3.2 of this TA, with ABM input datadocumentation included in Appendix C.
4.1.3Geometric HazardsReviewSummary
3.Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or
incompatible use?
32
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Evaluation
Includes review of the of the following transportation network enhancements:
Proposed Pedestrian Network
Proposed Bicycle Network
Proposed Roadway Sections
Proposed Vehicular Circulation Enhancements
Proposed Public Transit Amenities
Proposed Parking Enhancements
Proposed Placemaking Enhancements
Determination
Less than significant impact. The Geometric Hazards analysis is further discussed in Section 3.3 of this
TA.
4.1.4Inadequate Emergency AccessReviewSummary
4.Would the project result in inadequate emergency access?(Emergency Access)
Evaluation
Includes evaluation of the following emergency services:
Emergency Medical Access
Emergency Fire Access
Police Access
Determination
Less than significant impact. The inadequate emergency accessanalysis is further discussed in Section
3.4 of this TA.
33
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Appendix A-Preferred Roadway
Sections
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Appendix B-PPOP Review
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Appendix CSEDTAZInputs for
Activity-Based Model (ABM)
PubAdm_em
p
OthSer_em
p
ArtEnt_em
440000 440000
p
Educ_em
p
1004068
1004068
Prof_em
p
FIRE_em
p
Infor_em
p
Trans_em
p
Ret_em
p
Whole_em
p
Manu_em
p
Const_em
p
_em
g
A
00000000205339000032323196393665381220000 00000000205339000032323196393665381220000 00000000315405000000171651044711270000000029223800899177000012824901540407500 0000292238004044967700002999000591111
677500 0000361114000751510000445 0000361114000751510000445
p
0000000000000000000000000000
HHMFDUTot_em
RES
POP
Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040Ex2040
18745718745783203832036301197 10631333106313333684891122326301197 10531053105310534564562152141828182877161613918148776605529296865600587217261404392878322223415355815355868248682485571227
9861391986139143561541859811201872 8878898598604444444334331879187900115119232169787012211430830572765054382403709431433113113955 13491349134913495875875565568611248 12071229119312155705944925197547
5400931011701257470252459593539272812813953722932616500
Subarea
DSPnon-DSP8768768768762852862929 Total TotalDSPnon-DSP833833833833367367350350563645 Total Totalnon-DSP13491349134913495875875565568611248 Total Total
Source
SCAG SEDSCAG SEDSCAG SED
Land Use Conversion
Land Use ConversionLand Use Conversion
TAZ
211151002111520021125300
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Appendix DProject Area Existing
Parcel Data
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Transportation Assessment
January 2024
Appendix EThe Natelson Dale
Group, Inc. (TNDG) Real Estate
Market Report
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Jami Williams DATE: April 27, 2022
Debbie Jewell
RRM Design Group
FROM: Roger Dale, Principal FILE:#4165
Alan Levenson, Senior Associate
The Natelson Dale Group, Inc. (TNDG)
SUBJECT: Real Estate Market Overview and Long-range Demand Projections for
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
This memorandum and the attached data tables provide a summary of TNDG’s real estate
demand projections for the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP) area in El Segundo. Themarket
overview is not intended to be a full-blown market study to definethefeasibility of specific
development projects, but provides a planning-levelanalysis of real estate absorption
potentials in the study area. Inparticular, the analysis forecasts long term (20-year)
development demand for the following land uses:
Retail/restaurant
General office
Medical office
Multi-family residential
The market forecasts are based on customized versions of TNDG’s demand projection models,
and also reflect the existing downtown business mix in El Segundo (and in three comparison
cities). For each land use, TNDG has forecasted potential citywide demand and then estimated
the market shares or “capture rates” potentially achievable with the DTSP area.
Summary of Market Demand Projections
Summary Table A (on the next page) provides a brief overview of the market demand
projections. Potential demand within the DTSP area (through 2040) is projected as follows
(rounded):
Retail/restaurant space – 70,000 to 170,000 square feet
General office – 120,00 to 250,00 square feet
Medical office – 25,000 square feet
Multi-family residential – 200 to 375 units
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
is
it
for
serving land
demand will
-
Aggressive
city
a
El Segundo’s percentage share ofregional grow over time Aggressive forecasts reflect a continuation of El Segundo’s office absorption rates over past 10 yearsBaseline projections increased
by 50% to reflect potential expansion in zoning cap
a resident
ssive scenarios (since
/Key Assumptions
Demand Scenarios
primarily
Basis
mile trade
-
limited potentials to capture regional
Baseline
5
El Segundo’s percentage share of regional (5area) demand will remain constantBaseline forecasts reflect modest employment growth projected by SCAGMedical office demand is assumed to
be the same for baseline and aggreassumed to beuse, with demand)Citywide forecast generally corresponds to City’s RHNA requirements
9597
-
(through 2040)
375
California 9288
24,000
166,500250,000
Aggressive
9596 . Fax: (714) 692
-
through 2040
, Yorba Linda,
DTSP Demand,
200
Summary Table A
69,50024,000
115,500
Baseline
P.O. Box 489
Phone: (714) 692
750
El Segundo and Downtown Specific Plan Area
160,000
1,045,0002,500,000
Aggressive
Overview of Market Demand Projections
ugh 2040
thro
500
Citywide Demand,
465,000770,000160,000
Baseline
for El Segundo DTSP Update
2
Land Use
family residential
-
, 202
2
Retail/restaurant (square feet)General office (square feet)Medical office (square feet)Multi(dwelling units) Source: The Natelson Dale Group, Inc. (TNDG).
Real Estate Demand AnalysisApril 27Page
Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update
April 27, 2022
Page 3
Tables1a and 1bon the next two pagesprovide an abbreviated summary of TNDG’s 20-year
demand projections for the DTSP area. Table 1a provides baseline projectionsand Table 1b
provides more aggressive projections. Assumptions underlying the baseline and aggressive
forecasts for each land use include the following:
Retail/restaurant. The baseline scenario for retail/restaurant demand reflects the
assumption that El Segundo’s capture rates of demand from the regional trade area
(defined for these purposes as a 5-mile radius) will remain constant over the next 20
years. Whereas the overall “pool” of regional demand will grow somewhat due to
projected (relatively modest) population growth, El Segundo’s share of total demand
would remain constant in percentage terms. Under the aggressive retail/restaurant
scenario, El Segundo’s capture rates of local and regional demand are assumed to
increase. Overall growth in regional demand would be the same as under the baseline
scenario, but El Segundo’s percentage shares would increase (as detailed in appendices
A and B).
Office. The baseline office demand projections are tied to the relatively modest
employment growth rates projected for El Segundo in the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG) regional demographic forecast for the period 2020-
2045. The aggressive office demand forecasts assume that El Segundo would achieve an
annual office absorption rate on par with recent historic (2010-2020) trends.
Residential. The baseline residential demand projections reflect a relatively modest
level of new housing development and are based on the Regional Housing Needs
Allocation (RHNA) numbers for El Segundo.The aggressive residential demand
projections have been derived by TNDG to reflect the more robust market conditions
that would potentially exist with expanded residential zoning capacity in El Segundo.
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update
April 27, 2022
Page 4
Table 1a
Potential Demand for New Development, 2020-2040 (BASELINE SCENARIO)
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Area
Citywide Potential Total
Land Use Demand Downtown Downtown
(Rounded) Capture RateDemand
Retail (square feet)
Restaurant 55,000 30%16,500
Grocery 25,000 30%7,500
GAFO(1) 275,000 10%27,500
Hardware/Auto Parts 60,000 5%3,000
Services 50,000 30%15,000
Total 465,00069,500
Office (square feet)
General Office 770,000 15%115,500
Medical Office160,000 15%24,000
Residential (dwelling units) (2) 500 40%200
(1)GAFO = General Merchandise, Apparel, Furniture, and Other/Specialty retail sales
categories.
(2) The Pacific Coast Commons mixed-use project (with a total of 263 residential units) will
absorb a significant portion of project citywide housing demand. This project (located
outside the DTSP area was approved by the El Segundo City Council on March 15, 2022.
Source: TNDG.
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update
April 27, 2022
Page 5
Table 1b
Potential Demand for New Development, 2020-2040 (AGGRESSIVE SCENARIO)
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Area
Citywide Potential Total
Land Use Demand Downtown Downtown
(Rounded) Capture RateDemand
Retail (square feet)
Restaurant 155,000 30%46,500
Grocery 70,000 30%21,000
GAFO(1) 660,000 10%66,000
Hardware/Auto Parts 60,000 5%3,000
Services 100,000 30%30,000
Total 1,045,000166,500
Office (square feet)
General Office 2,500,000 10%250,000
Medical Office160,000 15%24,000
Residential (dwelling units) (2) 750 50%375
(1)GAFO = General Merchandise, Apparel, Furniture, and Other/Specialty retail sales
categories.
(2) The Pacific Coast Commons mixed-use project (with a total of 263 residential units) will
absorb a significant portion of project citywide housing demand. This project (located
outside the DTSP area was approved by the El Segundo City Council on March 15, 2022.
Key Market Conditions Influencing Downtown El Segundo’s Development Potentials
Future development opportunities within the Downtown Specific Plan areawill be influenced
by the following existing and foreseeable market conditions:
Retail and office demand in El Segundo reflect the City’s unique status as a small
residential community with a massive daytime employment population. Whereas the
1
City’s resident population in 2019was approximately 16,800 persons, in 2019 there
were an estimated 73,800 jobs in the City. These numbers equate to approximately 4.4
jobs per resident. In contrast, the jobs-per-resident ratios in the neighboring cities of
Culver City, Hermosa Beach, and Manhattan Beach were 1.9, 0.4 and 0.6, respectively
(and the overall average for Los Angeles County was 0.5).
1
The analysis uses 2019 as the base year for the retail demand analysis, in order to avoid distortions caused by the
COVID-19 pandemic (and assumed to be temporary for purposes of the long-term forecasts).
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update
April 27, 2022
Page 6
Due to El Segundo’s extraordinary jobs/resident ratio, the City supports far greater retail
sales and has far more office space than would be typical for a residential community of
its size. Taxable sales in El Segundo in 2019 were $36,500 per resident compared to the
countywide average of $12,000. Among the three comparison cities considered in this
study, only Culver City had higher taxable sales per capita ($39,900); per capita taxable
sales in Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach in 2019 were $12,200 and $19,200,
respectively.
El Segundo has an existing inventory of 17.8 million square feet of office space,
representing nearing 5% of all office space in Los Angeles County. In contrast, the City’s
population represents only 0.2% of the Los Angeles County total, which again
underscores El Segundo’s very strong market position for non-residential development.
A key implication of this strong market position is that future retail and office
development opportunities in El Segundo will not specifically be constrained by resident
population growth (which is expected to be minimal, according to the official SCAG
forecast), but will be more broadly support by regional population increases and growth
in the larger Westside/South Bay economy.
After gradually recovering from high-vacancy conditions during the Great Recession, the
Los Angeles County office market has experienced significant new headwinds due to the
COVID-19 pandemic. Countywide, these impacts have translated to lowered transaction
volume, rising vacancy levels and slower rent growth (all of which discourage
development of new space).
The impact of the pandemic shutdown on the office market continues to take shape,
and the extent to which reduced demand for office space will become a permanent
condition (due to an increase in remote workers) is currently unclear. For planning
purposes, the office market demand analysis summarized below (and detailed in
Appendix C) assumes a gradual return to “normal” conditions of projected employment
growth translating to demand for new office space. However, a more permanent “Work
from Home” (WFH) workforce would clearly reduce the demand for new office space.
Future housing demand in El Segundo (under the baseline and the aggressive scenarios
considered in this analysis) is expected to be in the range of 500-750 units citywide over
the next 20 years, representing growth of approximately 25-38 units per year. These
annual levels of development would exceed recent historic growth rates (about 14 years
per year between 2010 and 2020). In order to achieve these accelerated levels of
development, the City will need to expand zoning capacity for higher-density housing.
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update
April 27, 2022
Page 7
Summary of Retail Demand Analysis (AppendicesAand B)
Table 2abelow provides a summary of TNDG’s retail demand analysisfor the baseline scenario.
This scenario assumes that El Segundo’s capture rates of demand from the regional trade area
(defined for these purposes as a 5-mile radius) will remain constant over the next 20 years.
Whereas the overall “pool” of regional demand will grow somewhat due to projected
population growth, El Segundo’s share of total demand would remain constant in percentage
terms.
Table 2a
Net Demand for New Retail Space, 2025-2040 (BASELINE SCENARIO)
City of El Segundo
Retail Category (square feet by year) 2025 2030 2035 2040
GAFO 240,049 252,857 264,721 276,695
Food and Beverage (grocery stores) 21,614 23,544 25,165 26,798
Food Service and Drinking (restaurants) 44,578 47,956 51,114 54,303
Bldg. Matrl. and Garden Equip. and Supplies 38,089 38,725 39,259 39,798
Auto Parts 21,737 21,938 22,107 22,278
Services Space @ 10% of Total 36,607 38,502 40,237 41,987
Grand Total 402,673 423,522 442,603 461,858
Source: TNDG.
Table 2b below provides a summary of TNDG’s retail demand analysis for the aggressive scenario. This
scenario assumes that El Segundo’s capture rates of local and regional demand would increase
slightly over time. Overall growth in regional demand would be the same as under the baseline
scenario, but El Segundo’s percentage shares would increase.
Table 2b
Net Demand for New Retail Space, 2025-2040 (AGGRESSIVE SCENARIO)
City of El Segundo
Retail Category (square feet by year) 2025 2030 2035 2040
GAFO 611,818 628,487 644,099 659,860
Food and Beverage (grocery stores) 65,450 67,861 69,968 72,093
Food Service and Drinking (restaurants) 142,073 146,469 150,620 154,812
Bldg. Matrl. and Garden Equip. and Supplies38,08938,725 39,25939,798
Auto Parts 21,737 21,938 22,107 22,278
Services Space @ 10% of Total 87,91790,348 92,60594,884
Grand Total 967,082 993,828 1,018,659 1,043,724
Source: TNDG.
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update
April 27, 2022
Page 8
Summary of Office Demand Analysis (Appendix C)
Table 3 below provides a summary of TNDG’s baseline demand projections forgeneral and
medical office space. Table 4 provides the aggressive office demand scenario. The baseline
scenario is driven by SCAG projections for future employment growth in the City. The
aggressive scenario reflects a continuation of El Segundo’s recent historic (2010-2020)
2
absorption rate for office space.
Table 3
Demand for New Office Space, 2020-2040 (BASELINE SCENARIO)
City of El Segundo
Variable 2020-2030 2030-2040 Total
Demand Projections(square feet)
General Office 349,470 422,840 772,310
Medical Office (over and above
73,389 88,796 162,185
general office demand)
Source: TNDG.
Table 4
Demand for New Office Space, 2020-2040 (AGGRESSIVE SCENARIO)
City of El Segundo
Variable 2020-2030 2030-2040 Total
Demand Projections(square feet)
General Office 1,238,225 1,238,2252,476,450
Medical Office (over and above
73,389 88,796 162,185
3
general office demand)
Source: TNDG.
2
Estimated at approximately 124,000 square feet per year (annual average for 2010-2020).
3
Demand for medical office space is projected to be the same for both the baseline and aggressive scenarios.
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update
April 27, 2022
Page 9
Housing Market Analysis
As a starting point for projecting potential housing demand in El Segundo, TNDG reviewed the most
recent demographic forecasts for El Segundo from the Southern California Association of Governments
4
(SCAG)
. The SCAG forecasts indicate that El Segundo will reach approximately 7,332 households by
5
2045. There are currently (as of 2020) 7,077 households in the city. Thus, based on the SCAG
projections, El Segundo would experience a net increase of approximately 255 households. Assuming a
standard housing vacancy factor of 5%, the 255 new households would translate to demand for
construction of approximately 268 new housing units, or about 11 units per year during the 2020-45
SCAG forecast period. In comparison
, Table 5 shows that new residential development averaged
about 14 dwelling units per year in the City for the 11-year period between 2010 and 2020
(according to U.S. Census residential permit data).Although the historical average is generally
consistent with the SCAG forecast, it should be noted that this was a period without official
State policy to strongly encourage new residential development.
Table 5
Residential Building Permit Unit Totals by Building Unit Size, 2010-2020
City of El Segundo
Building 11-yr
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Unit Size Avg
1 Unit 3 3 14 13 0 5 0 25 41 8 14 11.5
2 Units 0 8 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.3
3-4 Units0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 4 1.2
5+ Units 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
Total 3 11 14 22 0 5 0 28 41 11 18 13.9
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Place Level Residential Building Permit Statistics; TNDG.
6
Given that a single planned development project (Pacific Coast Commons) will account for
nearly all of the housing growth projected by SCAG for the next 20 years, TNDG believes that
the SCAG forecasts significantly understate the amount of new housing developmentthat could
be captured in El Segundo under favorable market/policy conditions. In particular, the SCAG
forecasts are largely informed by the scarcity of available land for new development. Thus,
these official forecasts are likely to substantially underrepresent actual market demand given
the potential to redevelop existing non-residential development into higher density residential
development. Indeed, just meeting the City’s RHNA allocation requires the City to plan for the
4
Forecasts from the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) / Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), with
th
cycle RHNA Allocation Plan, March 4, 2021.
adjustments from the 6
5
Official count from the 2020 U.S. Census.
6
Pacific Coast Commons was approved by the El Segundo City Council on March 15, 2022 and will include 263
multi-family residential units.
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update
April 27, 2022
Page 10
capacity to build 492 new dwelling units, which would represent annual development of about
20 units if spread overthe 2020-45 SCAG forecast period.
TNDG believes that City’s RHNA target (approximately 500 units) represents a conservative
baseline for the level of housing demand in El Segundo over the next 20 years. Given the
potential to increase allowed residential densities in targeted areas (including development
opportunities currently being considered for the Civic Center area within the DTSP), TNDG
believes itis appropriate for planning purposes to also consider a more aggressive housing
forecast in which 20-year development would exceed the baseline forecast by 50% (i.e., for a
total of 750 units). Table 6 below summarizes the baseline and aggressive scenarios; the SCAG
forecasts are also shown for context.
Table 6
Demand for New Residential Dwelling Units, 2020-2040
City of El Segundo
Forecast Scenario Totals
SCAG Forecast (for context)
2020-45 SCAG Forecasted Household Growth 255
Effective Dwelling Unit Growth @ 5% Vacancy 268
Projected Growth per Year11
2020-40 Forecast New Dwelling Units215
Baseline Scenario
2020-45 RHNA Adjusted Dwelling Unit Growth 492
Projected Growth per Year20
2020-40 Forecast New Dwelling Units394
Allowance for market demand above RHNA requirement 106
Total potential demand, 2020-40 500
Aggressive Scenario
Baseline forecast500
Adjustment (50%) to account for potential new zoning capacity250
Total potential demand, 2020-40 750
Source: TNDG; SCAG, 2020-45 regional forecast and 6th cycle RHNA.
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update
April 27, 2022
Page 11
Comparative Evaluation of Downtown Tenant Mix
As part of the process of evaluating the competitivenessof El Segundo’s downtown, TNDG
compiled detailed inventories of all retail, entertainmentand other “storefront” commercial
tenants in El Segundo and three “comparison” downtowns. This information is summarized in
Tables 7 and 8 below and detailed in Appendix D. The three comparison downtowns were:
Culver City, Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach.
Table 7
Summary of Storefront Land Uses by Major Category
Selected Downtowns
Hermosa Manhattan
Category El Segundo Culver City
BeachBeach
Restaurants 53 38 47 41
Other Retail 21 17 33 63
Entertainment 1 1 1 -
Services/Offices 120 21 56 35
Automobile-related 2 - - -
Vacant Spaces 9 5 9 4
Grand Total, All Tenant Types 206 82 146 143
Source: TNDG
Table 8
Percentage Breakdown of Storefront Land Uses by Category
Selected Downtowns
Average
Hermosa Manhattan
Category El Segundo Culver City
(other
Beach Beach
towns)
Restaurants 25.7% 46.3% 32.2% 28.7% 34.0%
Other Retail 10.2% 20.7% 22.6% 44.1% 30.5%
Entertainment 0.5% 1.2% 0.7% 0.0% 0.5%
Services/Offices 58.3% 25.6% 38.4% 24.5% 30.2%
Automobile-related 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Vacant Spaces 4.4% 6.1% 6.2% 2.8% 4.9%
Grand Total, All Tenant Types 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Source: TNDG
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update
April 27, 2022
Page 12
Table 9
Number of Retail Tenants by Category
Selected Downtowns
Hermosa Manhattan
Category El Segundo Culver City
Beach Beach
Apparel 1 2 10 37
Eating & Drinking 53 38 47 41
Food 2 4 4 4
Furnishings & Appliances 3 1 1 4
Drugstores/Discount Stores 2 - - -
Hardware 2 1 1 -
Specialty 11 9 17 18
Grand Total, Retail 74 55 80 104
Source: TNDG
Table 10
Percentage Breakdown of Retail Tenants by Category
Selected Downtowns
Average
Hermosa Manhattan
Category El Segundo Culver City
(other
Beach Beach
towns)
Apparel 1.4% 3.6% 12.5% 35.6% 20.5%
Eating & Drinking 71.6% 69.1% 58.8% 39.4% 52.7%
Food 2.7% 7.3% 5.0% 3.8% 5.0%
Furnishings & Appliances 4.1% 1.8% 1.3% 3.8% 2.5%
Drugstores/Discount Stores 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Hardware 2.7% 1.8% 1.3% 0.0% 0.8%
Specialty 14.9% 16.4% 21.3% 17.3% 18.4%
Grand Total, Retail 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Source: TNDG
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update
April 27, 2022
Page 13
Table 11
Number of Retail Tenants by Sub-Category
Selected Downtowns
Hermosa Manhattan
Category El Segundo Culver City
BeachBeach
Apparel
Women's Apparel 1 - 5 18
Men's Apparel - 2 1 1
Children's Apparel - - 1 1
Other Apparel - - 2 14
Shoes - - 1 3
Eating & Drinking
Fine Dining - - 1 5
Casual Dining 33 24 36 23
Upscale Fast Food 2 7 2 -
Other Fast Food 9 - - 2
Bakery 1 - - 3
Ice Cream/Yogurt/Juice 4 2 5 4
Coffee/Tea 2 4 4 5
Bar 2 1 - 4
Entertainment/Recreation
Live Theater 1 - 1 -
Movie Theater - 1 - -
Food Stores
Supermarket - - - 1
Convenience Market - - 1 -
Wine/Gourmet - - 1 1
Liquor Store 1 - 2 -
Other Specialty Food 1 4 - 2
Furnishings & Appliances
Appliance - 1 - -
Home Décor 3 - 1 4
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update
April 27, 2022
Page 14
Hermosa Manhattan
Category El Segundo Culver City
Beach Beach
General Merchandise
Discount/Dollar Store 1 - - -
Drugstore1---
Hardware/Building Materials
Lock & Key Store 2 1 1 -
Service/Office
Bank 4 1 4 3
Health/Fitness (gyms, yoga) 11 2 6 -
Medical Office 27 3 5 5
Other Office 47 9 17 14
Salon/Spa/Barber/Nails 20 5 15 9
Other Storefront Service 11 1 9 4
Specialty
Antiques 1 1 1 -
Art 3 1 - 4
Books - 2 - 1
Florist 1 2 1 2
Jewelry 2 - 2 3
Other Specialty Retail 4 3 13 8
Automobile Related
Gas Station 1 - - -
Automobile Service 1 - - -
Other
Civic Buildings 9 5 4 4
Hotel - - - 1
Church 2 - - -
GRAND TOTAL,
STOREFRONT TENANTS 208 82 142 149
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update
April 27, 2022
Page 15
Hermosa Manhattan
Category El Segundo Culver City
Beach Beach
Civic Uses in Downtown
City Hall YES YES NO YES
Library NO NO YES YES
Post Office NO YES YES NO
Fire StationYESYESYESNO
Police/Sheriff Station YES NO NO NO
Community/Senior CenterYESNOYESNO
Source: TNDG
P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885
Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597
Appendix A
Retail Demand Calculations
(BASELINE SCENARIO)
Appendix B
Retail Demand Calculations
(AGGRESSIVE SCENARIO)
Appendix C
Office Demand Calculations
Appendix D
Storefront Tenant Lists for Downtowns
(El Segundo, Culver City, Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach)
El Segundo
Downtown Specific
Plan Update
Local Transportation Assessment
Prepared for:
RRM Design Group, City of El Segundo
January 26, 2024
LB21-0042
Table of Contents
1. Introduction...............................................................................................................................1
1.1 Project Description ...............................................................................................................................................................
1
1.2 Transportation Scenarios ................................................................................................................................................... 4
1.3 Study Intersections ...............................................................................................................................................................
4
1.4 Organization of this Report .............................................................................................................................................. 4
2. Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Study Area ...............................................................................................................................................................................
5
2.2 Existing Street System ......................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.3 Existing Public Transit Service .......................................................................................................................................... 9
2.4 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ...................................................................................................................10
2.5 Existing Traffic Volume and Level of Service ...........................................................................................................10
2.5.1 Existing Volume and Lane Configuration ......................................................................................................10
2.5.2 Level of Service Methodology ...........................................................................................................................12
2.5.3 Existing Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................13
3. Future (2040) Projections and Roadway Enhancements ..................................................... 14
3.1 Project Trips ..........................................................................................................................................................................14
3.1.1 Project Trip Generation .........................................................................................................................................14
3.1.2 Project Trip Distribution .......................................................................................................................................14
3.1.3 Project Trip Assignment .......................................................................................................................................14
3.2 Future (2040) Base Conditions ......................................................................................................................................17
3.2.1 Background or Ambient Growth .......................................................................................................................17
3.2.2 Related Project .........................................................................................................................................................17
3.3 Future (2040) Plus Project Conditions ........................................................................................................................18
3.3.1 Future (2040) Project Mobility Enhancements ............................................................................................18
4. Intersection Traffic Analysis ................................................................................................... 21
4.1 Future Plus Project Analysis ............................................................................................................................................21
4.1.1 Future Base Level of Service ...............................................................................................................................21
4.1.2 Future Plus Project Level of Service .................................................................................................................21
Appendix A Study Intersections Existing Volume (Counts) ................................................. 24
Appendix B Study Intersections Future Volume ................................................................... 25
Appendix C ICU Calculations ................................................................................................... 26
th
Appendix D HCM 6 (Synchro) Calculations ......................................................................... 27
Appendices
Appendix A Study Intersections Existing Volume (Counts)........................................................................................... 24
Appendix B Study Intersections Future Volume ................................................................................................................ 25
Appendix C ICU Calculations ..................................................................................................................................................... 26
th
Appendix D HCM 6 (Synchro) Calculations ...................................................................................................................... 27
List of Figures
Figure 1-1 - Proposed Project and Study Intersections ........................................................................................................ 3
Figure 2-1 - Existing Lane Configurations and Traffic Volume ....................................................................................... 11
Figure 3-1 - Trip Distribution ........................................................................................................................................................
15
Figure 3-2 - Project Volume and Lane Configuration ......................................................................................................... 16
Figure 3-3 Future (2040) with Project Lane Configurations and Traffic Volume .................................................. 20
List of Tables
Table 1-1: Project Net New Land Uses ........................................................................................................................................ 2
Table 2-1: Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions ....................................................................................... 12
Table 2-2: Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions ................................................................................. 13
Table 2-3: Existing Intersection Operations ............................................................................................................................ 13
Table 3-1: Project Preferred Road Sections ............................................................................................................................ 18
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
1.Introduction
This report documents the assumptions, methodologies, and findings of anon-CEQA (California
Environmental Quality Act) Local Transportation Assessment (LTA) conducted by Fehr & Peers to identify
future intersection operationconditionswith theEl Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update (Project) in
the City of El Segundo, California. The boundary of the Downtown Specific Plan Area (Project Area) is shown
in Figure 1-1. TheProject is proposed to enable the buildout of the Downtown Specific Plan area according
to the land uses described in Table 1-1. The Project is also proposed to include the mobility enhancements
described in Section 3.3.1. As the City of El Segundo does not have adopted guidance for intersection level
of service (LOS) analysis, this LTA was conducted to in accordance with the Intersection Capacity Utilization
1
(ICU) methodology described and utilized in the City of El Segundo General Plan Circulation Element.
1.1Project Description
The ProjectArea is approximately 43.8 acres in size and is in the northwest quadrant of the City of El
Segundo, which is approximately 20 miles southwest from downtown Los Angeles. The Project Area is
located southwest of the interchange of the Interstate 405 Freeway (I-405) and State Route 90 (Imperial
Highway), west of Pacific Coast Highway and north of El Segundo Boulevard. The Interstate 105 Freeway (I-
105) is north of the ProjectArea, immediately north of Imperial Highway. The Project Areais bounded by
Mariposa Avenue to the north and El Segundo Boulevard to the south. Los Angeles International Airport
(LAX) is located to the north; the Los Angeles County community of Del Aire and the City of Hawthorne are
located to the east; the City of Manhattan Beach is located to the south; and the Hyperion Sewage Treatment
Plant, Dockweiler Beach, and Pacific Ocean are located to the west. Figure 1-1 illustratesthe Project Area.
The Project proposes the following net-new land uses in the Project Area, through 2040:
Retail and Restaurant: 130,000 square feet
Office: 200,000 square feet
Medical Office: 24,000 square feet
Residential Units: 300 units
Theproposednet new land use quantities through 2040 are further described in Table 1-1.
1
City of El Segundo, City of El Segundo General Plan Circulation Element, September 2004
1
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
Table 1-1: ProjectNet NewLand Uses
Net New
1
Land UseUnits
(Through 2040)
2
Restaurant KSF35.21
2
Grocery KSF15.92
2
General Retail KSF51.51
2
Hardware/Auto Parts KSF3.00
2
Other Services KSF24.36
General Office KSF200.00
Medical Office KSF24.00
Residential DU300
1
KSF = Thousand Square Feet, DU = Dwelling Unit
2
The DSP Project Description describes a combined total of 130 KSF for retail and restaurant. Breakdown of specific uses was estimated
based on Table 1a and 1b in Real Estate Demand Analysis for El Segundo DTSP Update (2022) report produced by The Natelson Dale
Group, Inc.
The Project also proposesa roadway modification of Main Street, Grand Avenue, and Richmond Street to
enhance multimodal mobility. These preferred roadway sections arefurther discussed in Section 3.3.1 and
described in Table 3-1.
2
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
1.2TransportationScenarios
This study analyzes the potential project-generated traffic effectsto the local street system under both
Existing and Future traffic conditions. The following traffic scenarios have been developed and analyzed as
part of this study:
Existing ConditionsThe existing conditions analysis includes a description of the transportation
system serving the Project Area, existing traffic volumes, and an assessment of the operating
conditions at the study analysis locations described below. This scenario is described in detail in
Chapter 2.
Future Base (Year 2040) ConditionsFuture traffic projections without the proposed Project were
developed for the year 2040. The objective of this analysis was to project future traffic growth and
operating conditions that could be expected to result from regional growth, relatedprojects, and
transportation network changes in the vicinity of the Project site by the year 2040. This scenario is
described in detail in Chapter3.
Future (Year 2040) withProject ConditionsThis traffic scenario provides projected traffic volumes
and an assessment of operating conditions under future conditions with the addition of Project-
generated traffic. The effectsof the proposed Project on future traffic operating conditions were
then identified. This scenario is described in detail in Chapter3.
1.3Study Intersections
A total of three (3)intersectionswere selected for the analysis of the Project in consultation with the City of
El Segundo staff.The study intersections and their control type are listed below.
1.Main Street & Mariposa Avenue(signalized)
2.Main Street & Grand Avenue(signalized)
3.Main Street & El Segundo Boulevard(all-way stop control)
1.4Organization of this Report
This report is divided into fourchapters, including this introduction. Chapter2 describes existing conditions
including an inventory of the streets, highways, and transit service in the study area, a summary of existing
traffic volumes, and an assessment of existing operating conditions. The methodologies used to develop
traffic forecasts fortheFuture Base and Future plus Project scenarios and a description of future geometric
and signal phasing enhancements are described in Chapter3. Chapter4 presents an assessment of
intersection traffic conditionswith the addition of Project tripsand future geometric and signal phasing
enhancements.
4
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
2.Existing Conditions
Comprehensive data collection was conducted to develop a detailed description of existing conditions in
the Project Area. The assessment of existing conditions includes a description of the Project Area, an
inventory of the local street system, a review of traffic volume on these facilities, an assessment of the
resulting operating conditions, and the current transit service in the study area. This chapter presents a
detailed description of these elements.
2.1Study Area
The approximately 43.8-acre Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) areais currently regulated by the 2000 City of
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan, a regulatory document which the Project would replace. Existing land
uses within the Project Area include retail, restaurant, office, and residential, as described in Table 1-1. The
DSPArea also includes various civic uses, such as El Segundo City Hall, the El Segundo Police Department
(ESPD) headquarters, and El Segundo Fire Department (ESFD) Station #1. Because the Project Area defines
specific boundaries within which Project land usebuildout and conceptual roadway enhancements may
occur, the Study Area in this analysis is defined as the Project Area, as shown in Figure 1-1. Thus, the terms
Project Area and Study Area are used interchangeably in this LTA.
2.2Existing Street System
Major streets serving the Project Area include El Segundo Boulevard,Grand Avenue, and Mariposa Avenue
in the east-west direction and Main Streetin the north-south direction. Regional access to the Project Site
is provided by I-105 (Glenn Anderson Freeway), I-405 (San Diego Freeway)and CA-1 (Pacific Coast
Highway/Sepulveda Blvd), with the nearestinterchange approximately 1 mile to the northeast (I-105). Local
access to the Project Areais provided by several local streets and avenues, listed below. Per the El Segundo
2
Circulation Element, the followinglist describesthe designation of the major streets located within or
directly adjacent to the Project Area:
El Segundo Boulevard Secondary Arterial (east of Main Street), 4-Lane Collector (west of Main
Street)
Grand Avenue Secondary Arterial
Mariposa Avenue 2-Lane Collector (east of Main Street), Local Street (west of Main Street)
Main Street Secondary Arterial (south of Grand Avenue), 4-Lane Collector (north of Grand Avenue)
The City of El Segundo Circulation Element, defines the following street classifications:
2
City of El Segundo,City of El Segundo General Plan Circulation Element, September 2004
5
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
Major Arterials
Major arterials function to connect traffic from collectors to the major freeway system as well as
to provide access to adjacent land uses. They move large volumes of automobiles, trucks and
buses, and link the principal elements within the City to other adjacent regions. These facilities
handle inter-city and intra-city vehicular trips in the magnitude of 40,000 to 75,000 vehicles per
day (VPD). They should be planned for eight lanes of through traffic. In the majority of cases in El
Segundo, curb parking will be prohibited during peak periods. Bicycle traffic would travel with
vehicular flow or be separated by a path behind the curb. Raised medians can be used to separate
opposing flows of vehicular traffic as necessary. Access points, (i.e., driveways andminor
intersecting streets) should be minimized.
Separate left-turn lanes at major signalized intersections would be mandatory with double left-
turn lanes the rule rather than the exception. Separate right-turn lanes which also serve as bus
loading areas would be considered at locations indicating high tum volumes. At some
intersections up to three left turn and up to two right turn lanes may be provided, if needed, and
if acquisition of additional right-of-way is practical.
Secondary Arterials
Secondary arterials are similar to major arterials in function. They connect traffic from collectors to
the major freeway system. They move large volumes of automobiles, trucks and buses, and link
the principal elements within the City to other adjacent regions. These streets handle intra-city
trips in the magnitude of 25,000 to 55,000 VPD and are not as continuous in length as major
arterials. At least six through lanes should be provided to handle these needs along with single or
double left-tum lanes (the latter preferably) at major signalized intersections. Curb parking would
be prohibited during peak periods. Bicycle traffic would have to use paths behind the curb,
separate bicycle lanes, or travel in the street with autos, trucks and buses.
Collector Streets
The collector street is intended to serve as an intermediate route to handle traffic between local
streets and arterials. In addition, collector streets provide access to abutting property. Collector
streets are anticipated to carry traffic volumes between15,000 to 40,000 VPD and serve important
internal functions within the community. A collector street may have one through lane per
direction; but more realistically, it should have a minimum of two through lanes (at least during
peak periods). In some cases, a 4-lane collector may have a median divider. Curb parking can be
accommodated if abutting property owners have insufficient off-street parking. The function of
the collector, however, is to "collect" vehicles from the local street system and transportthem to
the arterial system as efficiently as possible.
Signalization of collector/local street intersections should be timed to permit the majority of the
traffic flow on the collector while allowing local street access. Restriction of free flow along
collectors due to unwarranted stop controls should be discouraged.
6
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
Local Streets
Local streets principally provide vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access to property abutting the
public right-of-way. Cross sections of local streets vary, depending on the abutting land uses,
parking requirements, street trees, and other considerations. Where both sides of the street are
served equally in residential areas, the common right-of-way width for a local street is 60 feet
with a 36-foot pavement width.
In multi-family areas where there is continuous parking throughout the day, a minimum of 40 feet
of pavement may be required to provide room for two moving lanes of traffic in addition to street
parking on both sides. In commercial and industrial areas, a minimum pavement width of 40 feet
is considered necessary. In industrial areas, consideration of the predominant type of trucking,
and whether or not maneuvering of trailers must be provided, may require a pavement width of
more than 44 feet.
When pavement widths exceed 40 feet on local streets, rights-of-way should be increased above
60 feet. Each parkway width should be 12 feet, including landscaped area and sidewalk. Sidewalk
width should be 4 feet in residential areas and 5 feet in commercial or industrial areas.
The overall system design of local streets can greatly affect traffic. Unduly long streets build up
traffic volumes and act as collectors. Cross streets and intersections with acute angles are likely to
contribute to accidents. Good practice precludes carrying local streets into arterials since such
intersections create unnecessary friction points and cause related congestion on the arterials. A
far better approach is to bring local streets into collectors which then feed into arterials.
Described below are the primary freeway and roadways that provide regional and local access to the Project
Area.
Freeways
I-105 (Glenn Anderson Freeway) is orientedin the east-west direction located north of the Project.
Near the Project Area, I-105 provides three lanes in each direction. I-105 terminates onto Imperial
Highway, providing access to the Project Area.
I-405(San Diego Freeway)is anorth-south freewaylocated east of the Project. Located about 2.5
miles from the Project Area, I-405 provides five to six lanes in each direction. Access to the Project
Area isprovidedvia on and off-ramps to El Segundo Boulevard.
East West Streets
Roadways located within or adjacent to the Project Area:
El Segundo Boulevard is designated as a Secondary Arterial (east of Main Street)anda 4-Lane
Collector (west of Main Street)anddefines a portion of the southern boundary of the Project Area.
El Segundo Boulevard provides two travel lanes in each direction. Approximately 2.5 miles east of
the Project Area, El Segundo Boulevard provides access to and from I-405.
7
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
Grand Avenue is designated as a Secondary Arterial and bisects the Project Area east-west. Grand
Avenue provides access to Vista Del Mar, west of the Project Area. Grand Avenue includes two travel
lanes in each direction with parking permitted on both sides of the street and both sides of the
(shared vehicle-bicycle lane marking)bicycle route.
Grand Avenue is a dedicated truck route, and the speed limit is 25 mph.
Mariposa Avenue is designated as a 2-Lane Collector (east of Main Street)and aLocal Street (west
of Main Street)and forms portions of the northern boundary of the Project Area. Mariposa Avenue
provides one travel lane in each direction, with parking on some segments.
Roadways that provide local and regional access to the Project Area:
Imperial Highway is designated as a Secondary Arterial oriented east-west, located approximately
0.9miles north of the Project Area. Imperial Highway provides two travel lanes in each direction
and features Class II bicycle lanes. Northeast of the Project Area, Imperial Highway provides access
to and from I-105.
North South Streets
Roadways located within or adjacent to the Project Area:
Main Street is designated as a Secondary Arterial (south of Grand Avenue)and a 4-Lane Collector
(north of Grand Avenue)and serves as the primary north-south thoroughfare through the Project
Area. Main Street is the center of commercial activity in the Project Area. Main Street provides two
from Imperial Highway to the north and El Segundo Boulevard to the south. The speed limit on
Main Street is 25 miles per hour (mph). South of Grand Avenue, Main Street is a truck route, as
defined in the General Plan Circulation Element, which is noted by signage.
South of Holly Avenue, Main Street can accommodate in-road bollards for temporary
street closures. Bollards can be mounted in the permanent in-road receptacles to
temporarily close approximately 340 feet of Main Street for special events, such as
Roadways that provide local and regional access to the Project Area:
CA-1 (Pacific Coast Highway, PCH, Sepulveda Boulevard)is designated as a Major Arterial and
is located approximately one mile east of the Project Area. PCH provides four travel lanes in each
direction and serves as access to I-105, LAX, and neighboring cities to the south of El Segundo.
Vista Del Mar is designated as a Secondary Arterial, locatedapproximately two-thirds of a mile
west of the Project Area. Vista Del Mar provides two travel lanes in each direction and serves as the
major coastal thoroughfare through El Segundo. From the Project Area directly, access to Vista Del
Mar is only provided via Grand Avenue.
8
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
2.3Existing Public Transit Service
The Project Area is served by Beach Cities Transit and City of El Segundo Transportation. Below is a list of
the bus routes that provide service to and within the Project Area:
Beach Cities Transit Line 109
Line 109 connects LAX and Torrance via El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, and
Redondo Beach. In Downtown El Segundo, this line utilizes along Main Street and Grand Avenue.
This line has headways of 40-50 minutes during weekdays.
Lunchtime Shuttle
Lunchtime Shuttle services were suspended during the COVID-19 pandemic and had not resumed
as of Winter 2023. Previously, the City of El Segundo Transportation Lunchtime Shuttle operated
on a continuous loop between Downtown El Segundo and the Smoky Hollowarea to the east
from 11:45 to 2pm on weekdays.
Beach Shuttle
Following suspended service during the COVID-19 pandemic, the City partnered with Swoop, Inc.
to resume Beach Shuttle service for the 2022 summer season. The Beach Shuttle operates
between El Segundo and El Porto Beach during the El Segundo Unified School District summer
break. There are several stops located near the Project Area.
Dial-a-Ride
The City currently operates Dial-a-Ride service in partnership with Lyft. This serviceprimarily
focuses on enhancing accessibility for seniors and disabled residents. The service operates on
weekdays and serves the entirety of the Project Area.
9
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
2.4Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
Main Street and Grand Avenue currently provide bicyclefacilities in the Project Area. These roadwaysare
designated asClass III bicycle routes with on-,
for their full extents within the Project Area.
Currently, pedestrian facilities are provided throughout the Project Area, including sidewalks on all streets,
and marked crosswalks at both intersections and at some midblock locations. There are four midblock
crosswalks, all located on Main Street, which feature pedestrian-activated in-road flashing lights, crosswalk
signs, and yield paddles.
2.5Existing Traffic Volume and Level of Service
This section includes theexisting peak hour traffic volumes, a description ofthe methodology used to assess
the traffic conditions at each intersection, and the existing peak hour LOS at the study intersections.
2.5.1Existing Volumeand Lane Configuration
Turning movement counts were conducted at the three study intersections between 7:00am and 10:00am
and from 4:00pm to 7:00pm on Tuesday, May 24th, 2022. From these six-hour counts, an AM and PM peak
hour was determined for each study intersection, and the counts from those hours were used for the LOS
analysis. Traffic count worksheets for these intersections are contained in Appendix A.A field visit was also
th
performed on July 8, 2022, at which signal operations, lane geometry, and other factors that impact
vehicular operations were observed and recorded.
10
12 (32)
BE
139 (271)
52 (61)
Main St
112 (138)BE
BE
132 (173)
67 (58)
CF
STOP
Main St
AG
140 (197)
STOP
B
14 (28)
20 (33)
STOP
338 (475)
D
20 (15)
Main St
94 (103)
D
334 (388)
51 (46)
ACF
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
2.5.2Level of Service Methodology
This LTA was conducted based on methodology described in theCity of El Segundo General Plan Circulation
Element.Per the Circulation Element, LOS calculations were performed using the Intersection Capacity
Utilization (ICU) methodology for signalized intersections and the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th
Edition for unsignalized intersections. ICU calculation spreadsheets and HCM 6th edition reports are
included in Appendix C and Appendix D.
The City of El Segundo General Plan Circulation Element defines LOS according to Table 2-1 for signalized
intersections and Table 2-2 for unsignalized intersections.
Table 2-1: Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions
Level of
Traffic QualityRange of ICU
Service
Low volume; high speeds; speed not restricted by other vehicles; all
Asignal cycles clear with no vehicles waiting through more than one 0.00-0.60
signal cycle.
Operating speed beginning to be affected by other traffic; between
one and ten percent of the signal cycles have one or more vehicles
B0.61-0.70
which wait through more than one signal cycle during peak hour
traffic periods.
Operating speeds and maneuverability closely controlled by other
traffic, between 11 and 30 percent of the signal cycles have one or
C0.71-0.80
more vehicles which wait through more than one signal cycle during
peak traffic periods; recommended ideal design standard.
Tolerable operating speeds; 31 to 70 percent of the signal cycles have
one or more vehicles which wait through more than one signal cycle
D0.81-0.90
during peak traffic periods; often used as design standard in urban
areas.
Capacity, the maximum traffic volume an intersection can
accommodate; restricted speeds; 71 to 100 percent of the signal cycles
E0.91-1.00
have one or more vehicles which wait through more than one signal
cycle during peak traffic periods.
Long queues of traffic; unstable flow; stoppages of long duration;
Ftraffic volume and traffic speed can drop to zero; traffic volume will be Over 1.00
less than the volume which occurs at Level of Service "E."
Source: City of El Segundo General Plan Circulation Element
12
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
Table 2-2:Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions
Level of
Average Control Delay (s/veh)
Service
A0-10
B>10-15
C>15-25
D>25-35
E>35-50
F>50
Source: City of El Segundo General Plan Circulation Element
2.5.3Existing Level of Service
Existing year(2022)traffic volumes, presented in Appendix A, were analyzed using the methodologies
described above to determine the existing operating conditions at the study intersections. Table 2-3
summarizes the resulting V/C ratios for the ICU analysis and the seconds of delay per vehicle for the HCM
analysis ofexisting weekday morning and evening peak hours and the corresponding LOS at each of the
analyzed intersections. All three of the study intersections were found to perform at an acceptable LOS of
either A or B. Detailed LOS analysis sheets for the Project are provided in Appendix C and Appendix D.
Table 2-3:Existing Intersection Operations
23
IDIntersectionControlPeak HourICUAverage Delay (s)LOS
AM0.441 N/A A
1Main St & Mariposa AveSignal
PM0.500 N/A A
AM0.338 N/A A
2Main St & Grand AveSignal
PM0.424 N/A A
AM N/A 9.0A
3Main St & El Segundo BlvdAWSC
PM N/A 11.4B
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022
1
V/C represents volume/capacity and is a component of ICU methodology for signalized intersections
2
ICU represents the intersection capacity utilization of a signalized intersection
3th
Average delay is calculated using HCM 6Edition methodology in the Synchro 11 software for unsignalized intersections
AWSC = All-way stop control
13
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
3.Future (2040) Projectionsand
Roadway Enhancements
3.1Project Trips
The development of trip generation estimates for the proposed Project involves the use of a 3-step process:
trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment.
3.1.1Project Trip Generation
As indicated in Table 1-1, the proposed Project will enable the buildout of net new residential, retail,
restaurant, office, and medical office uses.The analysis in this LTA used the Mixed-Use Development (MXD)
trip generation methodology. The MXD methodology was developed in partnership with the Unites States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), to more accurately estimate the internalization of project trips
associated with mixed use developments and districts, and the associated net external trip generation of
mixed-use projects, which typically generate fewer vehicle trips than single use developments located in
more isolated settings. The MXD methodology adjusts typical Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip
rates to reflect the internalization and site-specific attributes of mixed-use developments.
3.1.2Project TripDistribution
The geographic distribution of tripsgenerated by the proposed Project was determined based on regional
distribution fromthe Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2020 Regional Transportation
Plan (RTP/SCS) Activity-Based Model (ABM). The ABM considers regional travel behavior, including
socioeconomic data change through 2040 and future transportation projects.
3.1.3Project TripAssignment
The traffic expected to be generated by the proposed Project was assigned to the street network based on
the distribution patterns from the ABM ofProject Area circulationconsiderations, such as parking lot and
structure locations. The distribution of project trips is illustrated in Figure 3-1 and the resulting intersection
turning movement volume of those trips isillustrated in Figure 3-2.Figure 3-2 also shows the future
intersection geometry discussed in Section 3.3.1.
14
1
Freeway
%
To/From I-405/I-105
North or East of Project Area
%
Local
To/From Northeast
of Project Area
Rec. Park
Local
To/From East
Grand Avenue
2
of Project Area
Local
%
To/From Southwest
of Project Area
Freeway
%
To/From I-405 South
of Project Area
%
El Segundo Boulevard
3
Figure 3-1
Study IntersectionsDistribution of Project Trips
%
Parks
Project Trip Distribution
DSP Boundary
26 (30)
20 (22)
AE
51 (58)
Main St
66 (81)
AE
AE
62 (76)
120 (139)
CF
STOP
Main St
AG
68 (138)STOP
B
(0)0
5 (9)
STOP
116 (235)
AE
0 (0)
Main St
0 (0)
AE
AE
257 (290)
0 (0)
ACF
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
3.2Future (2040) BaseConditions
To evaluate the potential effectsof the proposed Project on future (Year 2040) conditions, it was necessary
to develop estimates of future conditions in the area both with and without Project trips. Future (Year 2040)
Base weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the study intersections are provided in Appendix
B.The Future Base traffic conditions represent an estimate of future conditions without the proposed
Project inclusive of the ambient background growth and related project traffic, as described in Sections
3.2.1 and 3.2.2.
3.2.1Background or Ambient Growth
Future Base traffic volume was estimatedfor the Project Areaby applyingforecasted growth from the ABM
to the existing traffic counts. These forecastsincluded a 0.41% ambient growth rate in the AM peak hour
and a 0.19% rate in the PM peak hour. Future year scenarios of the ABM include travel trends, such as
increased telecommuting and buildout of the Metro regional rail network, which oftentimes reflect minimal
to zero ambient growth on many roadways. To provide the City with a conservative intersection operations
analysis that accounts for future ambient traffic growth, and does not rely on a decrease in traffic due to
telecommuting or rail transit, the growth from the nearest arterial with a positive traffic growth in the ABM,
which was Pacific Coast Highway, was utilized.
3.2.2Related Project
3
The Smoky Hollow Specific PlanArea is located to the east of the Project Area. As defined by the City of El
Segundo, the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan provides a framework and long-term strategy to guide public and
private investment in the Smoky Hollow area. As portions of the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan are in the same
transportation analysis zones (TAZs) as the Project Area, the analysis in this LTA includes the employment
growth projections defined within the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan. These employment growth projections
were included as inputs for the ABM, thus, the trips associated with the Smoky Hollow Specific Plan Buildout
are reflected in the cumulative growth described in Section 3.2.1.Adjacent neighborhoods to the north
and west of the Project Area are primarily residential in nature, consisting mostly of single-family homes.
As suggested by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2020 Connect SoCal (RTP/SCS)
growth forecast, no substantial change in population or employment is expected to occur in those primarily
residential areas through 2040.
Including both ambient growth and Smoky HollowSpecific Plan tripsprovides a conservative estimate of
future traffic projections.These projected traffic volumes, identified herein as the Future Base conditions,
represent the future conditions without the proposed Project.
3
Smoky Hollow Specific Plan, City of El Segundo, 2018.
17
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
3.3Future(2040)Plus Project Conditions
The proposed Project tripswere added to the Future(2040)Base traffic projections, resulting in Future
(2040) plus Project AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. The Future plus Project scenariospresent future
traffic conditions with the buildout enabled by theProject. Appendix B shows the volumes analyzed as part
of the Future plus Project scenario.
3.3.1Future (2040)Project Mobility Enhancements
The Project proposes the roadway cross sections for Main Street and Grand Avenue as described in Table
3-1.The preferred roadway cross sections include a Class III shared bicycle route on Grand
Avenue, which currently exists on the corridor, and a Class II bicycle lane on Main Street.
Table 3-1: Project Preferred Road Sections
11
RoadApproximate ExtentsExisting Typical SectionPreferred Typical Section
outdoordining/sidewalks(both
sides)
parallel parking (both sides)
Main El Segundo Blvd to
Street Mariposa Ave
outdoor dining/sidewalks (both
sides)
street and median)-in, both sides)
Grand Standard St to Concord
Avenue St
each direction)
Source: Fehr & Peers and RRM Design Group, 2023
1
Dimensions are approximate. Exact dimensions to be determined during engineering design
The roadway sections described in Table 3-1 describe typical within
the Project Area. At study intersection approaches, these sections would be modified to incorporate turn
pockets and receiving lanes necessary for efficient intersection operation. Additionally, in the DSP, protected
left turn phases atthe two signalized intersectionsare recommended, which requires left turn pockets.
This LTA includes intersection LOS analysis, which is based on geometry at intersection approaches, not
typical sections. While final engineering design should be based on further study prior to intersection
improvement implementation, this LTA considers the following lane configuration and signal phasing at
study intersection approaches. Future lane configurations are also described in Figure 3-3:
1.Main Street & Mariposa Avenue
One left turn lane and one shared through-right turn lane on each approach
18
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
Protected left turn phase on each approach
2.Main Street & Grand Avenue
One left turn lane and one shared through-right turn lane on each approach
Protected left turn phase on each approach
3.Main Street & El Segundo Boulevard
Same as existing
19
39 (64)
171 (303)
AE
108 (122)
Main St
188 (225)
AE
AE
205 (256)
193 (200)
CF
STOP
Main St
AG
220 (343)STOP
B
16 (30)
27 (44)
STOP
482 (728)
AE
22 (16)
Main St
102 (107)
AE
AE
619 (693)
56 (48)
ACF
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
4.Intersection Traffic Analysis
The intersection trafficanalysis evaluates the projected LOS at each study intersection under the Future
(2040)and Future (2040) plus Project conditions to estimate the incremental increase in the V/C ratio or
seconds of delay per vehicle expected to be caused by the proposed Project.
4.1Future Plus Project Analysis
4.1.1Future Base Level of Service
The year Future Base peak hour traffic volume wasanalyzed to determine the projected V/C ratio or delay
in seconds per vehicle and LOS for each of the analyzed intersections. Table 4-1 summarizes the Existing,
Future, and Future with Project V/C ratio, ICU, vehicle delay, and LOS. All three study intersections are
expected to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS of A or B during both AM and PM peak hours.
Detailed LOS calculationsheets are provided in Appendix C and Appendix D.
4.1.2Future Plus Project Level of Service
The resulting Future plus Project peak hour traffic volumes, provided in Appendix B, were analyzed to
determine the projected future operating conditions with the addition of the proposed Project trips. The
results of the Future plus Project analysis are also presented in Table 4-1, and the ICU and HCMcalculation
sheets are provided in Appendix C and Appendix D.
During the AM peak hour, both signalized intersections, Main Street and Mariposa Avenue (Int. 1) and Main
Street and Grand Avenue (Int. 2), are expected to operate at LOS C. The unsignalized intersection of Main
Street and El Segundo Boulevard (Int. 3) is expected to operate at LOS B.
During the PM peak hour, both signalized intersections, Main Street and Mariposa Avenue (Int. 1) and Main
Street and Grand Avenue (Int. 2), are expected to operate at LOS D. The unsignalized intersection of Main
Street and El Segundo Boulevard (Int. 3) is expected to operate at LOS C.
21
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
5.Conclusion
5.1.1Results
4
The Circulation ElementPolicy C3-1.2 defines that
intersection is LOS D. Intersections operating at LOS E or F shall be considered deficient. If traffic caused by a
development project is forecast to result in an intersection level of service change from LOS D or better to LOS
E or F, then the development impact shall be considered significant. If a development project is forecast to
result in the increase of intersection volume/capacity ratio (V/C) of0.02 or greater at any intersection that is
Based on Policy C3-1.2, all threestudyintersectionswouldcontinue operating at an acceptable LOS of A, B,
C, or D during both the AM and PM peak hoursunder the Cumulative with Project scenario.It should be
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as Senate Bill 743 removed level of service as a metric to
evaluate significant transportation impacts under CEQA.
4
City of El Segundo,City of El Segundo General Plan Circulation Element, September 2004
23
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
Appendix AStudy Intersections
Existing Volume (Counts)
24
AimTD LLC
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Main
2,7202162,003501TOTAL2,811
1141,0453011,625
1,460PM
1029582001,186
1,260AM
El Segundo
SC3457
ALL HOURS
1,0663680750
AM893
1,212451,14377
PM1,265
2,278TOTAL811,9501272,158
Main
Main
1,01697722197TOTAL1,187
46388103655
537PM
5133494532
479AM
PEAK HOUR
AM7:30 AM
9:45 AM
#N/A
PM4:30 PM
6:45 PM
3772033820
AM378
4511547533
PM523
828Total3581353901
Main
AimTD LLC
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Main
1,850390820640TOTAL1,728
1804533321,016
965PM
210367308712
885AM
El Segundo
SC3457
ALL HOURS
52515836934
AM561
76619367181
PM945
1,291TOTAL3511,0401151,506
Main
Main
680125305250TOTAL690
58173138401
369PM
67132112289
311AM
PEAK HOUR
AM7:30 AM
9:45 AM
#N/A
PM4:30 PM
6:45 PM
1845213912
AM203
2956127132
PM364
479Total11341044567
Main
AimTD LLC
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Main
958950863TOTAL1,202
670503766
570PM
280360436
388AM
El Segundo
SC3457
ALL HOURS
0000
AM0
0000
PM0
0TOTAL0000
Main
Main
379420337TOTAL448
280197279
225PM
140140169
154AM
PEAK HOUR
AM7:30 AM
9:45 AM
#N/A
PM4:15 PM
6:45 PM
0000
AM0
0000
PM0
0Total0000
Main
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
Appendix BStudy Intersections
Future Volume
25
RRR
WBLWBTWBWBLWBTWBWBLWBTWB
RRR
0000136
EBLEBTEBEBLEBTEBEBLEBTEB
RRR
PM Peak HourPM Peak HourPM Peak Hour
SBLSBTSBSBLSBTSBSBLSBTSB
Volume
RRR
Future
NBLNBTNBNBLNBTNBNBLNBTNB
RRR
Intersections
WBLWBTWBWBLWBTWBWBLWBTWB
RRR
Project-Only Volume
Study
Future (2040) Base Volume
Future (2040) with Project Volume
B
EBLEBTEBEBLEBTEBEBLEBTEB
RRR
AM Peak HourAM Peak HourAM Peak Hour
Appendix
SBLSBTSBSBLSBTSBSBLSBTSB
RRR
1Mariposa AveMain St223662210236256845721264812716493351074034863612541601252Grand AveMain St57151131221437351206489144112642813414418061501948840152863El Segundo BlvdMain St0001520167141001261770002
0503044217001942461Mariposa AveMain St01165025703960170002359029007911019002Grand AveMain St512026666212039523154545458223081761397397638865933El Segundo BlvdMain St0006800000001200001380001Mariposa
AveMain St22482271026195612363214348127167284410769348142722560601252Grand AveMain St10817139188205193902587963198166122303642252562001232911511282171793El Segundo BlvdMain St00022001671410012629700
03430304421700194382
INTIDE/ W StN/S StNBLNBTNBINTIDE/ W StN/S StNBLNBTNBINTIDE/ W StN/S StNBLNBTNB
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
Appendix CICU Calculations
26
Project Title:El Segundo DSP
Intersection:1 - Main St & Mariposa Ave
Description:Existing
Thru Lane:1600vphN-S Split Phase :N
Left Lane:1600vphE-W Split Phase :N
Double Lt Penalty:10%Lost Time (% of cycle) :10
ITS:0%V/C Round Off (decs.) :3
OLA Movements :
FF Movements:
Date/Time:AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACHMVMTLANESVOLUMECAPACITYV/CICU ANALYSIS
SouthboundRT0.005100.000N-S(1):0.177*
TH2.003341,6000.150N-S(2):0.163
LT0.00941,6000.059*E-W(1):0.108
WestboundRT0.0011700.000E-W(2):0.164*
TH1.00441,6000.116*
LT0.00241,6000.015V/C:0.341
NorthboundRT0.002000.000Lost Time:0.100
TH2.003381,6000.118*ITS:0.000
LT0.00201,6000.013
EastboundRT0.001900.000ICU:0.441
TH1.00521,6000.093
LT0.00771,6000.048*LOS: A
Date/Time:PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACHMVMTLANESVOLUMECAPACITYV/CICU ANALYSIS
SouthboundRT0.004600.000N-S(1):0.227*
TH2.003881,6000.168N-S(2):0.177
LT0.001031,6000.064*E-W(1):0.113
WestboundRT0.0012000.000E-W(2):0.173*
TH1.00571,6000.135*
LT0.00391,6000.024V/C:0.400
NorthboundRT0.003300.000Lost Time:0.100
TH2.004751,6000.163*ITS:0.000
LT0.00151,6000.009
EastboundRT0.002400.000ICU:0.500
TH1.00581,6000.089
LT0.00601,6000.038*LOS: A
* - Denotes critical movement
Project Title:El Segundo DSP
Intersection:2 - Main St & Grand Ave
Description:Existing
Thru Lane:1600vphN-S Split Phase :N
Left Lane:1600vphE-W Split Phase :N
Double Lt Penalty:10%Lost Time (% of cycle) :10
ITS:0%V/C Round Off (decs.) :3
OLA Movements :
FF Movements:
Date/Time:AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACHMVMTLANESVOLUMECAPACITYV/CICU ANALYSIS
SouthboundRT0.006700.000N-S(1):0.133*
TH2.001321,6000.097N-S(2):0.130
LT0.001121,6000.070*E-W(1):0.093
WestboundRT0.0010300.000E-W(2):0.105*
TH2.001331,6000.076*
LT0.0081,6000.005V/C:0.238
NorthboundRT0.001200.000Lost Time:0.100
TH2.001391,6000.063*ITS:0.000
LT0.00521,6000.033
EastboundRT0.004400.000ICU:0.338
TH2.001901,6000.088
LT0.00471,6000.029*LOS: A
Date/Time:PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACHMVMTLANESVOLUMECAPACITYV/CICU ANALYSIS
SouthboundRT0.005800.000N-S(1):0.200*
TH2.001731,6000.115N-S(2):0.153
LT0.001381,6000.086*E-W(1):0.124*
WestboundRT0.008200.000E-W(2):0.113
TH2.001461,6000.083
LT0.00381,6000.024*V/C:0.324
NorthboundRT0.003200.000Lost Time:0.100
TH2.002711,6000.114*ITS:0.000
LT0.00611,6000.038
EastboundRT0.008400.000ICU:0.424
TH2.001871,6000.100*
LT0.00481,6000.030LOS: A
* - Denotes critical movement
Project Title:El Segundo DSP
Intersection:1 - Main St & Mariposa Ave
Description:
N-S Split Phase :N
Thru Lane:1600vph
E-W Split Phase :N
Left Lane:1600vph
Double Lt Penalty:10%Lost Time (% of cycle) :10
ITS:0%V/C Round Off (decs.) :3
OLA Movements :
FF Movements:
Date/Time:AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACHMVMTLANESVOLUMECAPACITYV/CICU ANALYSIS
SouthboundRT0.005600.000N-S(1):0.192*
TH2.003621,6000.163N-S(2):0.177
LT0.001021,6000.064*E-W(1):0.117
WestboundRT0.0012700.000E-W(2):0.179*
TH1.00481,6000.126*
LT0.00261,6000.016V/C:0.371
NorthboundRT0.002200.000Lost Time:0.100
TH2.003661,6000.128*ITS:0.000
LT0.00221,6000.014
EastboundRT0.002100.000ICU:0.471
TH1.00571,6000.101
LT0.00841,6000.053*LOS: A
Date/Time:PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACHMVMTLANESVOLUMECAPACITYV/CICU ANALYSIS
SouthboundRT0.004800.000N-S(1):0.237*
TH2.004031,6000.174N-S(2):0.184
LT0.001071,6000.067*E-W(1):0.119
WestboundRT0.0012500.000E-W(2):0.180*
TH1.00601,6000.141*
LT0.00411,6000.026V/C:0.417
NorthboundRT0.003500.000Lost Time:0.100
TH2.004931,6000.170*ITS:0.000
LT0.00161,6000.010
EastboundRT0.002500.000ICU:0.517
TH1.00611,6000.093
LT0.00631,6000.039*LOS: A
*- Denotes critical movement
Project Title:El Segundo DSP
Intersection:2 - Main St & Grand Ave
Description:
N-S Split Phase :N
Thru Lane:1600vph
E-W Split Phase :N
Left Lane:1600vph
Double Lt Penalty:10%Lost Time (% of cycle) :10
ITS:0%V/C Round Off (decs.) :3
OLA Movements :
FF Movements:
Date/Time:AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACHMVMTLANESVOLUMECAPACITYV/CICU ANALYSIS
SouthboundRT0.007300.000N-S(1):0.145*
TH2.001431,6000.106N-S(2):0.142
LT0.001221,6000.076*E-W(1):0.101
WestboundRT0.0011200.000E-W(2):0.115*
TH2.001441,6000.083*
LT0.0091,6000.006V/C:0.260
NorthboundRT0.001300.000Lost Time:0.100
TH2.001511,6000.069*ITS:0.000
LT0.00571,6000.036
EastboundRT0.004800.000ICU:0.360
TH2.002061,6000.095
LT0.00511,6000.032*LOS: A
Date/Time:PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACHMVMTLANESVOLUMECAPACITYV/CICU ANALYSIS
SouthboundRT0.006100.000N-S(1):0.208*
TH2.001801,6000.120N-S(2):0.160
LT0.001441,6000.090*E-W(1):0.129*
WestboundRT0.008600.000E-W(2):0.118
TH2.001521,6000.087
LT0.00401,6000.025*V/C:0.337
NorthboundRT0.003400.000Lost Time:0.100
TH2.002811,6000.118*ITS:0.000
LT0.00641,6000.040
EastboundRT0.008800.000ICU:0.437
TH2.001941,6000.104*
LT0.00501,6000.031LOS: A
*- Denotes critical movement
Project Title:El Segundo DSP
Intersection:1 - Main St & Mariposa Ave
Description:Future
N-S Split Phase :N
Thru Lane:1600vph
E-W Split Phase :N
Left Lane:1600vph
Double Lt Penalty:10%Lost Time (% of cycle) :10
ITS:0%V/C Round Off (decs.) :3
OLA Movements :
FF Movements:
Date/Time:AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACHMVMTLANESVOLUMECAPACITYV/CICU ANALYSIS
SouthboundRT0.08561330.383N-S(1):0.382
TH0.926191,4670.422*N-S(2):0.436*
LT1.001021,6000.064E-W(1):0.080
WestboundRT0.731271,1610.078E-W(2):0.186*
TH0.27484390.109*
LT1.00431,6000.027V/C:0.622
NorthboundRT0.0527850.305Lost Time:0.100
TH0.954821,5150.318ITS:0.000
LT1.00221,6000.014*
EastboundRT0.25214000.046ICU:0.722
TH0.75631,2000.053
LT1.001231,6000.077*LOS: C
Date/Time:PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACHMVMTLANESVOLUMECAPACITYV/CICU ANALYSIS
SouthboundRT0.06481040.419N-S(1):0.550*
TH0.946931,4960.463N-S(2):0.473
LT1.001071,6000.067*E-W(1):0.099
WestboundRT0.681251,0810.082E-W(2):0.205*
TH0.32605190.116*
LT1.00601,6000.038V/C:0.755
NorthboundRT0.0644910.464Lost Time:0.100
TH0.947281,5090.483*ITS:0.000
LT1.00161,6000.010
EastboundRT0.26254120.056ICU:0.855
TH0.74721,1880.061
LT1.001421,6000.089*LOS: D
*- Denotes critical movement
Project Title:El Segundo DSP
Intersection:2 - Main St & Grand Ave
Description:Future
N-S Split Phase :N
Thru Lane:1600vph
E-W Split Phase :N
Left Lane:1600vph
Double Lt Penalty:10%Lost Time (% of cycle) :10
ITS:0%V/C Round Off (decs.) :3
OLA Movements :
FF Movements:
Date/Time:AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACHMVMTLANESVOLUMECAPACITYV/CICU ANALYSIS
SouthboundRT0.481937760.221N-S(1):0.249
TH0.522058240.249*N-S(2):0.317*
LT1.001881,6000.118E-W(1):0.250
WestboundRT0.461667300.169E-W(2):0.284*
TH0.541988700.228*
LT1.00631,6000.039V/C:0.601
NorthboundRT0.19392970.112Lost Time:0.100
TH0.811711,3030.131ITS:0.000
LT1.001081,6000.068*
EastboundRT0.23793750.177ICU:0.701
TH0.772581,2250.211
LT1.00901,6000.056*LOS: C
Date/Time:PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACHMVMTLANESVOLUMECAPACITYV/CICU ANALYSIS
SouthboundRT0.442007020.247N-S(1):0.370*
TH0.562568980.285N-S(2):0.361
LT1.002251,6000.141*E-W(1):0.356*
WestboundRT0.451797230.177E-W(2):0.325
TH0.552178770.248
LT1.001281,6000.080*V/C:0.726
NorthboundRT0.17642790.189Lost Time:0.100
TH0.833031,3210.229*ITS:0.000
LT1.001221,6000.076
EastboundRT0.341515470.238ICU:0.826
TH0.662911,0530.276*
LT1.001231,6000.077LOS: D
*- Denotes critical movement
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateLocal Transportation Assessment
January 26, 2024
th
Appendix DHCM 6(Synchro)
Calculations
27
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateExisting AM
10/14/2022
3: El Segundo Blvd & Main St
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh9
Intersection LOSA
MovementEBLEBTWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h613011616314014
Future Vol, veh/h613011616314014
Peak Hour Factor0.970.970.970.970.970.97
Heavy Vehicles, %222222
Mvmt Flow613412016814414
Number of Lanes011120
ApproachEBWBSB
Opposing ApproachWBEB
Opposing Lanes210
Conflicting Approach LeftSBWB
Conflicting Lanes Left202
Conflicting Approach RightSBEB
Conflicting Lanes Right021
HCM Control Delay9.48.59.6
HCM LOSAAA
LaneEBLn1WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2
Vol Left, %4%0%0%100%77%
Vol Thru, %96%100%0%0%0%
Vol Right, %0%0%100%0%23%
Sign ControlStopStopStopStopStop
Traffic Vol by Lane1361161639361
LT Vol6009347
Through Vol130116000
RT Vol00163014
Lane Flow Rate1401201689663
Geometry Grp47777
Degree of Util (X)0.1990.1710.2070.1610.1
Departure Headway (Hd)5.1055.1354.4316.0145.735
Convergence, Y/NYesYesYesYesYes
Cap701698808595623
Service Time3.1462.8682.1643.7663.488
HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.20.1720.2080.1610.101
HCM Control Delay9.48.98.39.99.1
HCM Lane LOSAAAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q0.70.60.80.60.3
HCM 6th AWSCSynchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan UpdateExisting PM
10/14/2022
3: El Segundo Blvd & Main St
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh11.4
Intersection LOSB
MovementEBLEBTWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h4220918723719728
Future Vol, veh/h4220918723719728
Peak Hour Factor0.940.940.940.940.940.94
Heavy Vehicles, %222222
Mvmt Flow4522219925221030
Number of Lanes011120
ApproachEBWBSB
Opposing ApproachWBEB
Opposing Lanes210
Conflicting Approach LeftSBWB
Conflicting Lanes Left202
Conflicting Approach RightSBEB
Conflicting Lanes Right021
HCM Control Delay12.810.611.4
HCM LOSBBB
LaneEBLn1WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2
Vol Left, %17%0%0%100%70%
Vol Thru, %83%100%0%0%0%
Vol Right, %0%0%100%0%30%
Sign ControlStopStopStopStopStop
Traffic Vol by Lane25118723713194
LT Vol420013166
Through Vol209187000
RT Vol00237028
Lane Flow Rate267199252140100
Geometry Grp47777
Degree of Util (X)0.4210.3140.3490.2640.178
Departure Headway (Hd)5.6795.6854.9776.8116.447
Convergence, Y/NYesYesYesYesYes
Cap636637726528557
Service Time3.7033.3852.6774.544.177
HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.420.3120.3470.2650.18
HCM Control Delay12.81110.31210.6
HCM Lane LOSBBBBB
HCM 95th-tile Q2.11.31.61.10.6
HCM 6th AWSCSynchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers
HCM 6th AWSCAM
04/07/2023
3: El Segundo Blvd & Main St
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh9.3
Intersection LOSA
MovementEBLEBTWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h714112617715216
Future Vol, veh/h714112617715216
Peak Hour Factor0.970.970.970.970.970.97
Heavy Vehicles, %222222
Mvmt Flow714513018215716
Number of Lanes011120
ApproachEBWBSB
Opposing ApproachWBEB
Opposing Lanes210
Conflicting Approach LeftSBWB
Conflicting Lanes Left202
Conflicting Approach RightSBEB
Conflicting Lanes Right021
HCM Control Delay9.78.89.8
HCM LOSAAA
LaneEBLn1WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2
Vol Left, %5%0%0%100%76%
Vol Thru, %95%100%0%0%0%
Vol Right, %0%0%100%0%24%
Sign ControlStopStopStopStopStop
Traffic Vol by Lane14812617710167
LT Vol70010151
Through Vol141126000
RT Vol00177016
Lane Flow Rate15313018210469
Geometry Grp47777
Degree of Util (X)0.2190.1870.2280.1770.111
Departure Headway (Hd)5.1795.1964.4926.0995.809
Convergence, Y/NYesYesYesYesYes
Cap691690797586614
Service Time3.2252.9342.233.8593.569
HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.2210.1880.2280.1770.112
HCM Control Delay9.79.18.610.29.3
HCM Lane LOSAAABA
HCM 95th-tile Q0.80.70.90.60.4
Future Base AM 10:17 am 03/09/2023 Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSCM
04/07/2023
3: El Segundo Blvd & Main St
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh11.8
Intersection LOSB
MovementEBLEBTWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h4421719424620530
Future Vol, veh/h4421719424620530
Peak Hour Factor0.940.940.940.940.940.94
Heavy Vehicles, %222222
Mvmt Flow4723120626221832
Number of Lanes011120
ApproachEBWBSB
Opposing ApproachWBEB
Opposing Lanes210
Conflicting Approach LeftSBWB
Conflicting Lanes Left202
Conflicting Approach RightSBEB
Conflicting Lanes Right021
HCM Control Delay13.310.911.7
HCM LOSBBB
LaneEBLn1WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2
Vol Left, %17%0%0%100%69%
Vol Thru, %83%100%0%0%0%
Vol Right, %0%0%100%0%31%
Sign ControlStopStopStopStopStop
Traffic Vol by Lane26119424613798
LT Vol440013768
Through Vol217194000
RT Vol00246030
Lane Flow Rate278206262145105
Geometry Grp47777
Degree of Util (X)0.4430.3280.3670.2780.189
Departure Headway (Hd)5.745.7245.0426.8816.509
Convergence, Y/NYesYesYesYesYes
Cap628629717523551
Service Time3.7683.4512.7424.6154.244
HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.4430.3280.3650.2770.191
HCM Control Delay13.311.210.612.310.8
HCM Lane LOSBBBBB
HCM 95th-tile Q2.31.41.71.10.7
Future Base PM 10:17 am 03/09/2023 Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSCM
04/07/2023
3: El Segundo Blvd & Main St
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh10.6
Intersection LOSB
MovementEBLEBTWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h714112629722016
Future Vol, veh/h714112629722016
Peak Hour Factor0.970.970.970.970.970.97
Heavy Vehicles, %222222
Mvmt Flow714513030622716
Number of Lanes011120
ApproachEBWBSB
Opposing ApproachWBEB
Opposing Lanes210
Conflicting Approach LeftSBWB
Conflicting Lanes Left202
Conflicting Approach RightSBEB
Conflicting Lanes Right021
HCM Control Delay10.410.411
HCM LOSBBB
LaneEBLn1WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2
Vol Left, %5%0%0%100%82%
Vol Thru, %95%100%0%0%0%
Vol Right, %0%0%100%0%18%
Sign ControlStopStopStopStopStop
Traffic Vol by Lane14812629714789
LT Vol70014773
Through Vol141126000
RT Vol00297016
Lane Flow Rate15313030615192
Geometry Grp47777
Degree of Util (X)0.2350.1960.4030.2720.16
Departure Headway (Hd)5.5345.444.7346.4756.258
Convergence, Y/NYesYesYesYesYes
Cap642655753558577
Service Time3.633.2182.5124.1753.958
HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.2380.1980.4060.2710.159
HCM Control Delay10.49.610.711.610.1
HCM Lane LOSBABBB
HCM 95th-tile Q0.90.721.10.6
Future with Project AM 10:55 am 03/10/2023 Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSCM
04/07/2023
3: El Segundo Blvd & Main St
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh15.8
Intersection LOSC
MovementEBLEBTWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h4421719438234330
Future Vol, veh/h4421719438234330
Peak Hour Factor0.940.940.940.940.940.94
Heavy Vehicles, %222222
Mvmt Flow4723120640636532
Number of Lanes011120
ApproachEBWBSB
Opposing ApproachWBEB
Opposing Lanes210
Conflicting Approach LeftSBWB
Conflicting Lanes Left202
Conflicting Approach RightSBEB
Conflicting Lanes Right021
HCM Control Delay15.81615.4
HCM LOSCCC
LaneEBLn1WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2
Vol Left, %17%0%0%100%79%
Vol Thru, %83%100%0%0%0%
Vol Right, %0%0%100%0%21%
Sign ControlStopStopStopStopStop
Traffic Vol by Lane261194382229144
LT Vol4400229114
Through Vol217194000
RT Vol00382030
Lane Flow Rate278206406243154
Geometry Grp47777
Degree of Util (X)0.4970.3630.6340.4940.301
Departure Headway (Hd)6.4476.3275.6167.3117.058
Convergence, Y/NYesYesYesYesYes
Cap558568642491508
Service Time4.5044.0843.3725.0654.811
HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.4980.3630.6320.4950.303
HCM Control Delay15.812.717.71712.8
HCM Lane LOSCBCCB
HCM 95th-tile Q2.71.64.52.71.3
Future with Project PM 10:59 am 03/10/2023 Synchro 11 Report
APPENDIX J: AB 52 CONSULTATION
DOCUMENTATION
January 12, 2023
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians –Kizh Nation
Andrew Salas, Chairperson
P.O. Box 393
Covina, CA, 91723
Re:California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code section
21080.3, subd.(b) California Assembly Bill 52, and Senate Bill 18, Formal
Notification of Proposed Downtown Specific Plan Update Project (Project) in
the City of El Segundo (City), Los Angeles County
Dear Mr. Salas,
Pursuant to California Assembly Bill (AB) 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18, City of El Segundo (City)
is providing you with formal notification of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
DowntownSpecific Plan Update Project (proposed Project), located in the City of El Segundo,
California. The City, as lead agency, is reaching out to all groups listed on the California Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) Contact List in a good faith
effort to provide notification of the proposed project to groups that are traditionally or culturally
affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project. The present notice includes:
A description of the proposed project and location;
A clear and definitive statement that the tribe has 30 days to request consultation; and
The lead agency contact information.
Project Description and Location
The Specific Plan update area is approximately 43.8 acres in size and is inthe northwest quadrant
of the City of El Segundo, which is approximately 20 miles southwest from downtown Los
Angeles.DowntownEl Segundo is located southwest of the interchange of the Interstate 405
Freeway (I-405) and State Route 90 (Imperial Highway), west of Pacific Coast Highway and north
of El Segundo Boulevard. The Interstate 105 Freeway (I-105) is north of the Specific Plan area,
immediately north of the Imperial Highway. The Specific Plan is bounded by Mariposa Avenue to
the north and El Segundo Boulevard to the south. Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is
located to the north; the Los Angeles County community of Del Aire and the City of Hawthorne
are located to the east; the City of Manhattan Beach is located to the south; and the Hyperion
Sewage Treatment Plant, Dockweiler Beach, and Pacific Ocean are located to the west.
The El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan (Specific Plan) update is a revision to an existing
regulatory plan, which serves as zoning for properties within the boundaries of the Specific Plan.
The proposed Project does not involve a specific development proposal, however, it is anticipated
January 12, 2023
Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel
Band of Mission Indians
Anthony Morales, Chairperson
P.O. Box 693
San Gabriel, CA, 91778
Re:California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code section
21080.3, subd.(b) California Assembly Bill 52, and Senate Bill 18, Formal
Notification of Proposed Downtown Specific Plan Update Project (Project) in
the City of El Segundo (City), Los Angeles County
Dear Mr. Morales,
Pursuant to California Assembly Bill (AB) 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18, City of El Segundo (City)
is providing you with formal notification of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
Downtown Specific Plan Update Project (proposed Project), located in the City of El Segundo,
California. The City, as lead agency, is reaching out to all groups listed on the California Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) Contact List in a good faith
effort to provide notification of the proposed project to groups that are traditionally or culturally
affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project. The present notice includes:
A description of the proposed project and location;
A clear and definitive statement that the tribe has 30 days to request consultation; and
The lead agency contact information.
Project Description and Location
The Specific Plan update area is approximately 43.8 acres in size and is inthe northwest quadrant
of the City of El Segundo, which is approximately 20 miles southwest from downtown Los
Angeles. Downtown El Segundo is located southwest of the interchange of the Interstate 405
Freeway (I-405) and State Route 90 (Imperial Highway), west of Pacific Coast Highway and north
of El Segundo Boulevard. The Interstate 105 Freeway (I-105) is north of the Specific Plan area,
immediately north of the Imperial Highway. The Specific Plan is bounded by Mariposa Avenue to
the north and El Segundo Boulevard to the south. Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is
located to the north; the Los Angeles County community of Del Aire and the City of Hawthorne
are located to the east; the City of Manhattan Beach is located to the south; and the Hyperion
Sewage Treatment Plant, Dockweiler Beach, and Pacific Ocean are located to the west.
The El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan (Specific Plan) update is a revision to an existing
regulatory plan, which serves as zoning for properties within the boundaries of the Specific Plan.
January 12, 2023
Gabrielino Tongva Indians of
California Tribal Council
Robert Dorame, Chairperson
P.O. Box 490
Bellflower, CA, 90707
Re:California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code section
21080.3, subd.(b) California Assembly Bill 52, and Senate Bill 18, Formal
Notification of Proposed Downtown Specific Plan Update Project (Project) in
the City of El Segundo (City), Los Angeles County
Dear Mr. Dorame,
Pursuant to California Assembly Bill (AB) 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18, City of El Segundo (City)
is providing you with formal notification of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
Downtown Specific Plan Update Project (proposed Project), located in the City of El Segundo,
California. The City, as lead agency, is reaching out to all groups listed on the California Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) Contact List in a good faith
effort to provide notification of the proposed project to groups that are traditionally or culturally
affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project. The present notice includes:
A description of the proposed project and location;
A clear and definitive statement that the tribe has 30 days to request consultation; and
The lead agency contact information.
Project Description and Location
The Specific Plan update area is approximately 43.8 acres in size and is inthe northwest quadrant
of the City of El Segundo, which is approximately 20 miles southwest from downtown Los
Angeles. Downtown El Segundo is located southwest of the interchange of the Interstate 405
Freeway (I-405) and State Route 90 (Imperial Highway), west of Pacific Coast Highway and north
of El Segundo Boulevard. The Interstate 105 Freeway (I-105) is north of the Specific Plan area,
immediately north of the Imperial Highway. The Specific Plan is bounded by Mariposa Avenue to
the north and El Segundo Boulevard to the south. Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is
located to the north; the Los Angeles County community of Del Aire and the City of Hawthorne
are located to the east; the City of Manhattan Beach is located to the south; and the Hyperion
Sewage Treatment Plant, Dockweiler Beach, and Pacific Ocean are located to the west.
The El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan (Specific Plan) update is a revision to an existing
regulatory plan, which serves as zoning for properties within the boundaries of the Specific Plan.
January 12, 2023
Gabrielino /Tongva Nation
Sandonne Goad, Chairperson
106 1/2 Judge John Aiso St.,#231
Los Angeles, CA, 90012
Re:California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code section
21080.3, subd.(b) California Assembly Bill 52, and Senate Bill 18, Formal
Notification of Proposed Downtown Specific Plan Update Project (Project) in
the City of El Segundo (City), Los Angeles County
Dear Ms. Goad,
Pursuant to California Assembly Bill (AB) 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18, City of El Segundo (City)
is providing you with formal notification of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
Downtown Specific Plan Update Project (proposed Project), located in the City of El Segundo,
California. The City, as lead agency, is reaching out to all groups listed on the California Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) Contact List in a good faith
effort to provide notification of the proposed project to groups that are traditionally or culturally
affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project. The present notice includes:
A description of the proposed project and location;
A clear and definitive statement that the tribe has 30 days to request consultation; and
The lead agency contact information.
Project Description and Location
The Specific Plan update area is approximately 43.8 acres in size and is inthe northwest quadrant
of the City of El Segundo, which is approximately 20 miles southwest from downtown Los
Angeles.DowntownEl Segundo is located southwest of the interchange of the Interstate 405
Freeway (I-405) and State Route 90 (Imperial Highway), west of Pacific Coast Highway and north
of El Segundo Boulevard. The Interstate 105 Freeway (I-105) is north of the Specific Plan area,
immediately north of the Imperial Highway. The Specific Plan is bounded by Mariposa Avenue to
the north and El Segundo Boulevard to the south. Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is
located to the north; the Los Angeles County community of Del Aire and the City of Hawthorne
are located to the east; the City of Manhattan Beach is located to the south; and the Hyperion
Sewage Treatment Plant, Dockweiler Beach, and Pacific Ocean are located to the west.
The El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan (Specific Plan) update is a revision to an existing
regulatory plan, which serves as zoning for properties within the boundaries of the Specific Plan.
Theproposed Project does not involve a specific development proposal, however, it is anticipated
January 12, 2023
Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe
Charles Alvarez
23454 Vanowen Street
West Hills, CA, 91307
Re: California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code section
21080.3, subd.(b) California Assembly Bill 52, and Senate Bill 18, Formal
Notification of Proposed Downtown Specific Plan Update Project (Project) in
the City of El Segundo (City), Los Angeles County
Dear Mr. Alvarez,
Pursuant to California Assembly Bill (AB) 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18, City of El Segundo (City)
is providing you with formal notification of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
Downtown Specific Plan Update Project (proposed Project), located in the City of El Segundo,
California. The City, as lead agency, is reaching out to all groups listed on the California Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) Contact List in a good faith
effort to provide notification of the proposed project to groups that are traditionally or culturally
affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project. The present notice includes:
A description of the proposed project and location;
A clear and definitive statement that the tribe has 30 days to request consultation; and
The lead agency contact information.
Project Description and Location
The Specific Plan update area is approximately 43.8 acres in size and is inthe northwest quadrant
of the City of El Segundo, which is approximately 20 miles southwest from downtown Los
Angeles.DowntownEl Segundo is located southwest of the interchange of the Interstate 405
Freeway (I-405) and State Route 90 (Imperial Highway), west of Pacific Coast Highway and north
of El Segundo Boulevard. The Interstate 105 Freeway (I-105) is north of the Specific Plan area,
immediately north of the Imperial Highway. The Specific Plan is bounded by Mariposa Avenue to
the north and El Segundo Boulevard to the south. Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is
located to the north; the Los Angeles County community of Del Aire and the City of Hawthorne
are located to the east; the City of Manhattan Beach is located to the south; and the Hyperion
Sewage Treatment Plant, Dockweiler Beach, and Pacific Ocean are located to the west.
The El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan (Specific Plan) update is a revision to an existing
regulatory plan, which serves as zoning for properties within the boundaries of the Specific Plan.
Theproposed Project does not involve a specific development proposal, however, it is anticipated
Subject:California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code section 21080.3,
subd.(b) California Assembly Bill 52, and Senate Bill 18, Formal Notification of
Proposed Downtown Specific Plan Update Project (Project) in the City of El Segundo
(City), Los Angeles County
The proposed Project does not involve a specific development proposal, however, it is anticipated
that new commercial and residential development will occur within the Specific Plan area during
the planning period. The Land Use Demand table below provides proposed market demand projections
within the Specific Planarea (through 2040):
LAND USE DEMAND IN DOWNTOWN EL SEGUNDO
ProposedProject
Retail and Restaurant 130,000 square feet
Office 200,000 square feet
Medical Office 24,000 square feet
Residential Units 300 units
A more detailed overview of the proposed Project is provided in Exhibit No. 1 of this letter.
Project Involves Ground Disturbance:Yes
Consultation Request
If you have any comments or concerns regarding potential impacts to tribal cultural resources (as
defined in Public Resources Code § 21074) in relation to the proposed project, or would like to
request any additional information, please contact the City ataddress below or via email to Paul
Samaras at PSamaras@elsegundo.orgwithin 30 days of receipt ofthis notice with a formal request
for consultation. Please include in this responsethe name of a designated lead contact person.
Sincerely,
Paul Samaras, AICP, Principal Planner
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, California 90245
Attachments:
1.Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
NOTICE OF PREPARATION
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
City Project No.: Environmental Assessment No. EA 1311, General Plan Amendment No. GPA 21-
01, Zone Change No. ZC 21-01, and Specific Plan Amendment No. SPA 21-01
Project Name: El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update
Project Address: Downtown El Segundo (see Figures 1 and 2 for project location and project area
boundary)
Public Comment Period: January 12, 2023 through February 13, 2023
Public Scoping Meeting: February 2, 2023 from 5:30 PM to 7:00 PM
Public Scoping Meeting Location: City Hall Council Chambers
350 Main Street, El Segundo 90245
Pursuant to Section 21165 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15050 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the City of El Segundo (City) is the Lead Agency for the preparation
of a Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the proposed El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan
Update Project (Specific Plan/project). In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15082, the City has prepared
this Notice of Preparation (NOP) to provide responsible and trustee agencies, the Office of Planning and Research,
and the County Clerk with sufficient information describing the project and its potential environmental effects to
enable the responsible agencies to make a meaningful response to this NOP.
The City is requesting your agency’s specific and detailed input regarding the scope and content of the
environmental information related to your agency’s statutory responsibility that must be included in the Draft
PEIR. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15083, this NOP also serves to facilitate consultation with any persons
or organizations that may be concerned with the environmental effects of the Project. Additionally, this NOP
serves as a notice for the public Scoping Meeting, which is held to expedite and facilitate the consultation process.
The City of El Segundo has reviewed the above project and has prepared an Initial Study in accordance with
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15070.
Project Location. The Specific Plan Update area (project area) is in Downtown El Segundo, in the northwest
quadrant of the City of El Segundo. The project area is approximately 43.8 acres in size. The project area is irregular
in shape with portions extending to Eucalyptus Drive to the east, El Segundo Boulevard to the south, Concord
Street to the west, and Mariposa Avenue to the north. The project area is currently developed with a wide range
of commercial, residential, and public uses. The project area location is shown in Figure 1, Regional Location and
Figure 2, Specific Plan Update Project Boundary.
Project Description Overview. The project is a revision to the existing El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan, which
serves as land use and zoning for properties within the boundaries of the Specific Plan area. The project would
revise the existing Specific Plan planning districts, amend General Plan and zoning designations on eight parcels,
City of El Segundo Page 1 Notice of Preparation
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Project
and include mobility enhancements. The project would include public improvements and streetscape guidelines,
private urban form criteria, permitted land uses, development standards, mobility and infrastructure
improvements, an implementation plan, and administration processes.
The Specific Plan Update proposes to expand the boundaries of the Downtown Specific Plan area to include eight
parcels located on Standard Street to the north and south of Grand Avenue. The project proposes amendments
to the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan to change the land use designation on eight parcels from
Downtown Commercial to Downtown Specific Plan. The project would also amend the City’s zoning map to change
the zoning on eight parcels from Downtown Commercial (C-RS) to Downtown Specific Plan (DSP). The existing and
proposed land use and zoning are shown in Figures 3 through 6.
The project is proposed to accommodate future market demand in the project area. Potential demand within the
project area (through 2040) is projected as follows (rounded):
PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGE IN DOWNTOWN EL SEGUNDO
Proposed
Retail and Restaurant 130,000 square feet
Office 200,000 square feet
Medical Office 24,000 square feet
Residential Units 300 units
In addition to land use and zoning changes, the project would include mobility enhancements including expanding
pedestrian areas along portions of Main Street, Richmond Street, and Grand Avenue, which would create potential
changes to the number of travel lanes on those streets. The project would eliminate a portion of an existing truck
route that is located on Main Street between El Segundo Boulevard and Grand Avenue; proposes the potential
closure of a portion of Richmond Street to vehicles, generally from Franklin Avenue to Grand Avenue to create a
permanent pedestrian only street for outdoor dining and gathering; and include buffered bicycle lanes on Main
Street and Grand Avenue. The project would include pedestrian and transit improvements in the project area.
including widened sidewalks. Transit improvements could include bus stop enhancements and potentially new
and/or relocated bus stops. Widened sidewalks would also provide expanded outdoor seating and dining areas
for area restaurants.
The project would include modifications to parking standards and strategies and alternatives for on-street parking
and two new parking structures at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Standard Street and the northeast
corner of Richmond and Franklin. Lastly, the 2000 Specific Plan area was previously divided into six districts and
the Specific Plan update would adjust the Specific Plan area into four distinct districts: Main Street, Richmond
Street, Grand Avenue, and Civic Center districts. Figure 7, Proposed Specific Plan Districts, shows the four districts.
Potential Environmental Effects of the Project. The project could have potentially significant environmental
impacts to the following environmental topic areas: Aesthetics; Air Quality; Cultural Resources; Energy;
Greenhouse Gas Emissions; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Land Use and Planning; Noise; Paleontology;
Population and Housing; Public Services and Recreation; Transportation; Tribal Cultural Resources; and
Utilities/Service Systems.
City of El Segundo Page 2 Notice of Preparation
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Project
Because of the existing condition of the projectarea, which is fully developed and located in an urbanized setting,
implementation of the Specific Plan is not expected to result in any significant impacts to: Agriculture and Forestry
Resources; Biological Resources; Geology/Soils; Mineral Resources; and Wildfire. TheCity is proposing to “scope
out” these topics fromthe Draft PEIR without further study, as summarized in this NOP’s Appendix A, Initial Study.
This NOP, including Appendix A, isavailable for electronic download on the City’s website at:
https://www.elsegundo.org/downtownupdate.
Public Scoping Meeting.The project Scoping Meeting will be held in person at the location noted below. The
Scoping Meetingwillinvolve a presentation about the proposed projectand the environmental review process
and schedule. The purpose of the meeting is tofacilitate the receipt of written comments about the scope and
content of the environmental analysis to be addressed in the Draft PEIR. The Scoping Meetingis forinformation-
gathering, is not a public hearing, and no public testimony will be taken. No decisions about the Project will be
made at the Scoping Meeting. A separate public hearing for entitlement requests will be scheduled after the
completion of the Draft PEIR. The date, time, and websiteof the project’s Scoping Meeting are as follows:
Dateand Time: February 2, 2023 from 5:30 PM to 7:00 PM
Scoping Meeting Location: City Hall Council Chambers
350 Main Street, El Segundo 90245
Submitting Comments. The City will consider all written comments regarding the potential environmental effects
of the project receivedduring the NOP public review period. All written comments receivedwill be reviewed and
considered by the City as part of the environmental analysis of the proposed projectand will become a part of the
public record for the Draft PEIR. Written comments will be accepted duringthe Scoping Meeting, via email, and/or
via mail, and must be received bythe City by 5:00 P.M., February 13, 2023. Please direct your written comments
to Paul Samaras, City of El Segundo, Community DevelopmentDepartment, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA
90245, or email psamaras@elsegundo.org.
1/6/2023
______________________________________________ ___________________
Paul Samaras, AICP Date
Principal Planner
City of El SegundoPage 3 Notice of Preparation
El Segundo Downtown Specific Plan Update Project
QSPKFDU!TJUF
Qspkfdu!Bsfb
Tpvsdf;!PqfoTusffuNbqt!boe!Hpphmf!Nbqt-!Efdfncfs!3133/
Gjhvsf!2
Sfhjpobm!Mpdbujpo!Nbq
MARIPOSA AVE
PINE AVE
HOLLY AVE
GRAND AVE
FRANKLIN AVE
4136-027-010
EL SEGUNDO BLVD
LEGEND
Project Area Boundary
Single-Family ResidentialDowntown Commercial
Downtown
Two-Family ResidentialGeneral Commercial
Specific Plan
Multi-Family ResidentialPublic Facilities
Smoky Hollow
Heavy Industrial
Parks
Parking
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!3
Tqfdjgjd!Qmbo!Vqebuf!Qspkfdu!Cpvoebsz
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!4
Fyjtujoh!Mboe!Vtf!Eftjhobujpot
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!5
Qspqptfe!Mboe!Vtf!Eftjhobujpot
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!6
Fyjtujoh!\[pojoh
Tpvsdf;!SSN!Eftjho!Hspvq-!Bvhvtu!3133/
Gjhvsf!7
Qspqptfe!\[pojoh
NBSJQPTB!!!BWF
QJOF!!BWF
IPMMZ!!!BWF
GSBOLMJO!!BWF
FM!!TFHVOEP!!CMWE
Gjhvsf!8
Qspqptfe!Tqfdjgjd!Qmbo!Ejtusjdut
GABRIELENO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS - KIZH NATION
Historically known as The San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians recognized by
the State of California as the aboriginal tribe of the Los Angeles basin
January 20,2023
Project Name: Downtown Specific Plan Update Project, City of El Segundo. Los Angeles County
Thank you for your letter dated January 12,2023. Regarding the project above. This is to
concur that we agree with the Specific Plan. However, our Tribal government would like to request
consultation for all future projects within this location.
Andrew Salas, Chairman
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation
Andrew Salas, Chairman Nadine Salas, Vice-Chairman Dr. Christina Swindall Martinez,
secretary
Albert Perez, treasurer I Martha Gonzalez Lemos, treasurer II Richard Gradias, Chairman
of the council of Elders
PO Box 393 Covina, CA 91723 www.gabrielenoindians@yahoo.com gabrielenoindians@yahoo.com
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
EL SEGUNDO DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
E
and
s’ This December 2023
DSP he DSP will
and amend
will
Per
DSP ’s
mixed -which in some cases are
-
s are considered
and/
-Table 1
has
been
Segundo’s
a 20-
El Segundo
is
WP
MWD -
WD 2020 UWMP
-
--m-
and
ed ‘’
baseline demand assumes no
without
1 | Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
with
normal--
in Table 1
2023 -
similar land use considers
These
Landsc-
combined
le 100 acre-and
new demand and -
and A
Table 1. El Segundo Service Area Post-2020 Development Schedule, Net Demand
Development Project Development Net Net Demand
Schedule (AFY)
Housing Element 2020-
2030- 121
-2030
- 0
-2030 130
201--2030 10 2
&-2030 0
- -2030 0
--2030 0
p 2020-200 10 110
2020- 0
-2030 01
--2030 033
-2030 02
Subtotal Developments 1,100
Schedule includes
will
DSP all
2 | Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
normal
-
I
is who is
SWP
MWD
-
lan
10910. (a) Any city or coun
with this part.
(1)
r space.
(4)
A mixed-
(7) A pro
iness,
-
r
(1)
with the system.
to this
is not
r assessment
t site,
The El Segundo
El Segundo
red a Program EIR
3 | Page
December 2023 El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
WSA
single-
demand asDSP
r
WSA and
The ish guidesland use and zoning
he DSPwill
DSP DSP
will
This
e
-
The
area in orangeon a
1
Figure 1
:–
1
| Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
10910. (h)
when the assessment was prepared.
DSP
-
-
all
are El Segundo
3
-use
Table s
El Segundo ed
n area ’
S--
and
-
-
0
3
-
| Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
–
-
-
-
--
--
-
-
--
---2020-
Urban---
--22-21----
-
E
El Segundo’s
10910. (d) (1)
part pursuant
water system.
ion
water
s
req
| Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
cont.
the proposed project.
to pump under the order or decree.
- or medium-
-
department
-
ords.
ny
El
2
is a
MWD
-MWD and -
MWD
3
Di
2
3
.
021--
| Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
&
nia
and
s an 1
231
- Table 2
below -
he
2021-
ng Elemenwere
new---are
-in Table
Table 2. El Segundo
1
2023202 2030
2
Service Area Population
1 00 2310 10
% Average Annual Population Increase
N/A 3
’s
in Table E-2021-
Published in
The El Segundo is
included in red
-
--
-
| Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
P
Figure . including
---
l Segundo 2
’s MWD under
-
MWD
’s
10
’s single
’s s
11
.
.
.
-
--22-21----
10
.
11
.
10 | Page
December 2023 El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
MWD
12
single
El Segundo’s
are
agencies
Los Angeles
2020 UWM
Figure
Figure 4
a
LADWP
alland
Figureand
-2W-
-
-
agencies
Figure .
12
.
11| Page
December 2023 El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
-
13
El Segundo
six
El
Segundo would
Figure
-
-
’s 2020 UWMP
during
dbase ears
including El
El
Segundo
Figure 6.
13
.
12| Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
W
10910. (c) (1)
ater
-
he project
-
demand associated
an DSP
and all
Per
--dow--
2021-and
are
Demandsssumes no change in demand
in normal
Segundo
Table 3 shows
demand as and El Segundo
2020 UWMP and and
There
13 | Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
Table .
2020 2040
Normal Year Demand Projections, AFY
0 0 00 0 0
w
s will be
-required -
--
s
are Table
MWD I
| Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
1,2
Table 4. El Segundo
A
1
are
1
-
Grass
1
-
+
-
are
Grass
--using grass lawns -
1
s
1
Freerain barrelsare
grass
1
Program
In 2023 -
1
El Segundo CA
nd
Water Waste
2
ordinance and
2
-
2
ill irochuresgardens
seedia rograms c
media
Water Loss
2
The
2
-3/
Measures
| Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
DSP
El Segundo
s
demand
in
Nonr
s
\[S\]
were usedassessed
d
The
also
eir building land use
These recommended were
areas d
demand The
end uses
-
O - q
M -
-- 3
--
For
A
all d
is based on --S
M-Use Based
--
----Demand---Use--Demand--
Memo-
-
and-onal-end-uses--0
| Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
-–
N
an indoor
This
indoor assumes will be
oor ouse was
area and
demand was based on l
was
demands a
’
normal-
-
DSP
an
-
a
-
--
dwelli-
-
| Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
20-
enhance
-
ober
and ober
-
and December 2022
201-
and
-
assigned a new General
The allows
Assuming
AFY
Exchange
-
--sion/housing--
-2021-Accessed
| Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
20
AFY and
MWM
demand i
The
-
E-down
-
-A
The
age Exchange
m
21 AFY.
29 AFY
is
Using
7.71 AAFY
20
| Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
-
This -
2.02 AFY
-
-
--
a -
res The
21
s
16 AFY
-
--
--
-
22
17 AFY
P numerous commer
-
neighborhood
-
The - and s Plan
P will be Y All
21
-0-0-
22
e -
.
20 | Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
demand is included
2020
is
To demands will come online
s some
23
AFYdemandcoming
-
s
o
new
a quare- warehouse buildingdemand will come
dwelling is
assumed uare ee
included in
WSA
110 AFY.
deman1 AFY
0medium and
2023 and ine
7.07 AFY includes
is WSA
1.09 AFY includes
is WSA
–
– -
quare
23
-
---
21 | Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
-
indoor
2021 and 2022 was used
-
AFY
The 2200 Grand Par
-
2 AFY i
considers
An
inaccuraci
-
r
-
A
Table . Projected Annual Net New Demands (AFY)
Development Project 2040
Housing Element
0121121121
0
0
201- 02 2 22
0
-0
-0
22 | Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
Development Project2040
S 1 110110
01111
–033333333
02 2 22
Subtotal Developments129 700 1,1001,100
2
Grand Total Net New Development Demand4 72 1,01,1441,144
s
Table 6.
Development Project 2040
Housing Element
0 0
0
0 0 0 00
0 130 130 130 130
201-0 10101010
0 0 0 00
- 0 0 0 00
-0 0 0 00
0 0
0 0 0 00
0 0 0 00
– 0 0 0 00
0 0 0 00
Grand Total NetNew Development 6,249 6,2496,249
-
-meet the projected water demand associated with
10911. (c)
city or county determines that wate
23 | Page
December 2023El Segundo WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
Table
and all
Aand
demands
Table Table 3
Table
with
Table 7.
2
20202030
1
AFY
- 13
1 1
4
Assurance, AFY
4
0 00 0 00
4
%
e
Table
Table -in Table
-
combined
baseline 2023
El Segundo’s
normal -
all
ring non-e
-
| Page
Qsjoufe!po!41&!qptu.dpotvnfs!sfdzdmfe!nbufsjbm/!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Qsjoufe!po!41&!qptu.dpotvnfs!sfdzdmfe!nbufsjbm/!
Dpnnfou!Mfuufs!Op/!2
2
3
4
4!dpou/
4!dpou/
5
6
7
7!dpou/
Dpnnfou!Mfuufs!Op/!3
2
3
Dpnnfou!Mfuufs!Op/!4
2
3
4
Dpnnfou!Mfuufs!Op/!5
2
3
4
5
6
6
8
8!dpou/
9
:
21