CONTRACT 1453 Joint Powers Agreement1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
SJ 1
/o -2 9-7✓r
io-5 3
JOIa7" ASRUy11.:li 08M-Z�fo
P11A;31� :LI
I BAY C0 fl.':%J (''HA`JSPa -NTT Irl) .&.1 1Y
I:I Tl E MU TfY OF
E.OS f0!G!-'I_ aS
�]e South hay Cities, consisting_ of the Cities of Carson, -1-.c-mdo,
Ianlena., HT,,t}]One, Tler:tosa reach, 11'_-:indale, Loid.ta, ... i'lcttcjl Bel.d], '_�alos
-T:-rC.es 1!.3tates, Rancho Palos Vorde3, Ee-ondo Peach, iollirfr, Hills, "'ollin
Bills Estates a,;-ld Torrance, along with the City of Los JL'7E7--les, herein Lf.ter
called "CITIiS"; and the County of Los Anfieles, hervinafter called "COUiI'Y";
ar].1 the State of California, acting by and throuji its Dep.�nm2• nt of `i'ransnor-
tation, hereinafter called "STD?`.. ", to the extent peraitted by le,, al lii!i_tations
to hereby reco(jli:e and state that:
r:,r EP1-AS, on July 28, 1972, the California State Asserioly adopted House
tfsolution !.a. 97 which requested the State _1ft=_partr;r-nt of Public '••Jonl,s (nan
State Dxpartr ent of Transportation) in cooperation with the local aZe:ncies
involved, to continue transportation corridor studies in the ar,a served by
,State liirhwv Routes 107 and 1, which studies should. include Dull considera-
tion of facilities other than full fineways as a possible solution to the
ar" o.:51em; and
11EEPEAS, on,Novtri)er 16, 1972, Governor jilonald Pca<an noted in part that
16 the State, in cooperation with local jurisdictions, should explore all other
traansportation alternatives in the Route 107 (Torrance) arr-a before
17 fa,il.ving at a decision as has best to serve the projected transportation needs,
rhich study he believes should not exceed a period of three years; and
18
?MERTrAS, it is recognized that State, County and South Bay re,7ional and
19 .'local transportation planning must be closely coordinated to dcvel.or> a.
core rehensive cooperative plan to serve the transportation needs of this area;
20 and
21 ,PH REA.S, in response to the .State's invitation urZing local reprVsentation,
the CI!'IT?S, COUI"I'Y and S`1'ATi: have ford a transportation study team (South Bay
22 Cor-ridor Study Steering Corrrittee) to accorvplish a meaningful devclon;rent of a
transportation plan for this area; and
23
',.MREAS, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has an
24 intenast to assure that local transportation system development is consistent
.rith the Regional '>~ransportation Plan and SCAG has aided in securing federal
25 P ulds for purposes of this study; and
26 ?F'JAS, the Southern California Association of Governments and the
",outhern California Rapid Transit District are willing to act in an advisory
27 apacity throwlout the course of the study; and
28
29
30
31
the E--neral study alea is bounded by Lmnerial Hijaway on the north;
Harbor Freeway on the east, except that it shall include the entire City of
on; the Pacific Ocean on the south and urest; and that these boundaries are
+oxi.mate only; and
- 1 -
i
ro
CXy
t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
?8
29
30
31
',-MTN AS, while it is reconzi ed teat much congestion in the area is
attributable to Los AnE les International Airport with its surrounding
industry on the north and that Los Angeles Harbor, located in the southeast
conger of the study area will have transportation problems, it is enphasized
that this study will only address itself to the interrelationships between
theairport and the harbor with the study area, rather than include, those
areas as part of the study; and
KIE EAS, the study is to be perfor,x-,,d in two phases and Phase I, the
initial phase which comprehensively defines the transportation needs of the
area, along with policy and guideline determinations, has been completed; and
MEREAS, it is the purpose of this agr--erient to define the work to be done
in Phase II, the responsibility for perforru_ng such work, and the basis for
funding such work; 'and
M-IERLIS, it is the intent of the parties to this aS eement to conduct
Phase II of this study which will:
--- Bevelop and analyze alternative solutions, costs/benefits,
environmental and coi-munity impacts and constraints with
respect to common transportation probler*s in the South Bay
Study Area, and establish necessary data for a research
base; and
--- Analyze possible available' Bans of financing; and
--- Review the results of these activities with the community;
and
-- Propose a detailed transportation improvement program which
is acceptable to the community and which adequately satisfies
the transportation needs of the South Bay Study area.
NOW, 111iEREF'ORE, it is understood and agreed to by and between the parties
hereto as follows:
SECTIQ`d I STATE AGREES:
1. To provide advice and assistance in study procedures, staff resources,
and study materials for study development includinZ participation in both the
Steering Committee and Technical Committee.
2. To provide data necessary for the preparation of an Environmental
TiTpact Statement (EIS) and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), as required
by State or Federal statutes.
3. In concert with the other members of this study, to make recommenda—
tions regarding a transportation system.
4. To participate in the cost of this Phase II study as indicated in
Exhibit "A", attached, and hereby made a part of this agreement.
5. Total expenditure by the State shall not exceed $17,000.
e
— 2 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
SECT IOVI II Tl LE COU•11'Y AGPECS :
1. To provide advice and assistance in study procedures, staff resources,
study materials for study development including participation in both the
ring Committee and Technical Cormittee.
2. To provide data necessary for the preparation of an Environrrntal
L-npact Statement (EIS) and an Environm ntal Impact Report (EIR), as required
-)y State or federal statutes.
3. In concert with the other members of this study, to maize recczm)enda-
tions regarding a transportation system.
4. To participate in the cost of this Phase II Study as indicated in
�axhibit "A". attached, and hereby made a part of this agreement.
5. To provide existing data regarding transportation needs within the
>tudv area.
SECTION III L ACID OF THE CITIES AGP-:E:
1. To provide staff resources, study materials and existing data for
ms within their separate jurisdictional areas.
2. To provide data necessary for the preparation of an Environm ntal
act Statement (EIS) and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), as required
State or Federal statutes.
3. In concert with the other members of this study, to make recamienda=
rer'ar,ding a transportation system.
4. To participate in the cost of this Phase II Study as indicated in
it "A" attached, and hereby made a part of this agreeimnt.
SECTION IV THE CIYY OF TORRANCE AGREES:
1. In addition to the provisions of Section III, to receive and disburse
on behalf of, and at the direction of, the South Bay Corridor Study
injz Committee.
SECTION V IT IS F'NTUALLY UMERSTOOD AM AGREED THAT:
1. This Phase II study will develop and evaluate alternative transportation
tems .
2. The Steering Coruaittee shall have the responsibility and authority
'or* directing this Phase II study as set forth in Exhibit �;B % attached, and
0ereby made a part of this Agreement.
3. The Coordinator, as set forth in By-hibit "B", shall provide liaison
etween the Steering Co.-anittee, the Technical Committee, and the Consultant.
'he Coordinator shall also coordinate the efforts of the various aSencies,
:itizen groups, Consultant personnel and local officials, shall distribute
-oports as required by tie Steering Committee, shall guide the proU� ess of this
`base II Study, emphasizing the recorurendations and conclusions that were made
n the Phase I Final Report, and shall perform such other duties as directed
y the Steering Committee.
- 3 -
1
2
3
4
5
4. The City of Torrance 1,rill raccive and disburse funds on behalf of
and at the direction of, the South Day Corridor Study Steer1ri7 Coirnittee.
5. The Consultant shall conduct the study under the direction and approval
of the Steering Cor;raittee, assisted by the 'Technical CoixP.ittee and utilizing;
input from a Citizens Advisory Group, all as set forth in Exhibit "Pi", attached.
6. The Coastal. Corirdssion be kept informed as to the progress of the
tudv and be consulted on matter-, involving their areas of interest.
6 7. This Ph,:se II study shall result 5n a recu,•mended transportation
system and a plan for its ir-plerrr-ntation, tcgether with an } nvirrongental Impact
7. Statement and/or Dnviro:rmntal Dipact lenort .
8 S. This AD-eerxrnt is an entire i-ree;pnt of Phase IT between the parties
hereto for work to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. irris A ,re me It ;ra
g consent of all the
be modified, altered revised or terminated with written mmmmm_
parties UriH-o.
1.0
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
9. No participating agency, nor any officer or employee thereof, shall be
responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or
orcitted to be done by the other participants under or in connection with any
work, authority, or jurisdiction deleF;ated to the other participants under this
A,'rree,rent .
10. Cities included in the study area, but not now participating in this
Phase II study, will not be precluded from participating in Phase II or in
subsequent studies, provided that they have fulfilled the requireirtents of
Section III.
11. `The use of any consultants, other than as a.�reed herein, by one party
for a specialized study within its , Wis,diction will be at the discretion of
that party and costs for such consul Ling 'cork shall be the sole responsibility
of that party.
12. lne need for, and use of, consultants for any additional studies in
connection with the Phase II transportation study, which are to be paid for
from Phase II Study fun05, shall be determalned by the steerinz Cor`nittee
referred to in Ex.,Abit "B". In the event private firm are considered to
perform any ^rork financed in i :hole or in parr; by fluids from STAP"', the Steering,
Committee shall solicit at least three proposals and submit them toCether with
the reco^�nded subcontractor's name and proposed subcontract for approval to
,Mate prior to the contract a-:arrd and execution; accompanied by a written
,justification as to the selection of the particular consultant. Such contracts
shall contain all nrovisions set forth in paragraph 13 and III of this A?ree:rrent.
13. The tas'rs to be perforr—d under this ALmeement shall be as fe.nerally
described under Flxhihit "C".
14. The Fair D'rployrnnt Practices A.ddendu7, attached hereto as 13xhibit "D"
be made a part of this A ci-rnt. 'Jhenever the word "Contractor" is used
therein, it mans each party to this Agreement and its subcontractors.
15. i:he ..rork of this A[;reer:x�nt shall be completed within 24 months after
the execution unless of rer;rise e,:tendncl liy ierdt en... Jr� e-ent of tl-ie par�fds—
16. This Agreement shall be operative and binding on ar><y or all parties
hereto only if it is fully executed by all parties hereto on or before July 31,
1975.
-4--
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
17. The Steering Conmittee shall be authorized to enter into contracts
and to make appropriations relating to this study as set forth in Exhibit
I "A"
IN 1�a7lr-,SS 1,AEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreenpent to
be executed by their respective officers, duly authorized, the provisions
�i.
of which Agreement are effective this 2 day of June 1975.
'STATE OF CALIFOP.NIA
Department of Transportation
—r:i OF -761 ~rho x--
By
T-ep--Iil Officer
Approved as to form and
procedure:
A t 1111,Y)a X it ircr C
Tr, a: am Latiolll
I hereby
knowlcd�-,3 C.
available fkl "Ir"Zi 0-lul-IL. J"
Zz-)
Accounting Officer 133
- 5 -.
COUTIFY OF LOS ANGE'J'S
By
/ oi-i rvi s ors, ✓
Attest:
j: Zf-- ' rxec tive
:x M Clerk of Board
�K25 ,
;�O 'fice�r, of
of Supervisors
By
Deputy
Appmve(l as to f=r� and procedure-;
John fl. T=-3on, CoLLrity Cou-isel,
-.,Couylty of Los P,-Ij3�jcs
d
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
is
16
17
is
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
CITY or" CA 011j
By I 1 14 f�),
Attest:
Approved as to form and
procedure:
Cl:i'Y OF EL SEGUMO
Attest:
Approved as to form and
procedure:
IA
as to form and
OF
t
ved as to form and
dure:
- 6 -.
CITY Or, HERMOSA BEACH
Attest:
Approved as to form and
procedure:
MY OF, T-*711DALE
By
Attest
Approved as to form and
procedure:
CITY OF LO-M-M
By
Attest:
Approved as to form and
procedure:
CITY Or LOS A:N(',I-'D-,S
By
Attest!_
Approved as to form and
procedure:
1
2
CITY OF 1, liA d BEACH
4
Attest:
5
Approved as to form and
6
procedure:
i
8
9
C EnF PALOS VE DES ESTATES
10
11
12
Attest:
13
Approved as to form and
14
procedure:
15
16
17
CITY OF 17J
f0 ..,I °jd Jjfjj S
By
Attest:
Approved as to form and
procedure:
CI
BY
At
Approved as to form and
procedure:
CITY OF MIMHO PALOS HEROES
CITY OF 'I"ORRMCE
is
19
20
Attest:
Attest:
21
Approved as to form and
Approved as to form and
22
procedure:
procedure:
23
24
25
26
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
c -
S 1519�5
8
27r4nr
Rio
28
Attest:
t,'y p CY. ak Cc, •rl
29
kpp ved as tonforrn ,grad, proceclure:
_
Inzf r:2
a ... .� � ,-•
30
x 1.
31
�,J
Lr.l r•- r
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
is
16
17
is
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Ft
28
29
30
31
JMUBIT "A"
I. COST ALLOCATIM (FU3DI1JG, SOU RD"S AND A""0_LYJ'7PQ)
Each agency participatinF, in the Joint Po Seas Acree:,ent will provide
stud rmberia_ls, data and infon,,-1,ation 1.11 its cjjzto(�y ��;hidn may be Useful in
performlnC this StUdy, F-Ach. E4, ,e ,y1cy -rill .J,so ni-ovic]e staff j. sokwces In
perfoiminnce, of the Study as its share, coiltrlb I Iti oil.
It is anticipated that, the cost of deve2opmryt of the Phase II Study --
over and above the $240,000 funding to be obtained from federal sources, study
materials, data and information provided by each agency --will be a m-)Aimm of
$51,000. Study cots and expenditu-T--s will be as directed by the Steering
ConmAttee.
The STRI-EIS participation in the cost of developrrnt of the Phase II
Study shall be on the basis of providing one-tihird of these costs t;LT) to a
maximum share of $17,000. S`tA "is will pay the City of Torrat-ice, acting in
behalf of the South Bay Corridor Stul','xy SteerirLg Ca-Il-Ittee, upon billing,
one-third of the Stud P
y development costs that exc0c.,,d '240,000.
The COUEY'S participation in the cost of .(levelo-atent of the Phase II
Study shall be on the basis of providing one-third of these costs up to a
raximn share of $17,000. COTTITITY will pay to the City of Torrance, acting
in behalf of the South Bay Corridor Study Steering Cammittee, upon billing,
one-third of the Study develop7ient costs that exceed
ALL OF Vi1E CTTIR.91 collective participation in the cost of developr)nt
of the Phase II Study shall be on the basis of providing one-third of these
costs up to a -eximurin. share of *17,000. ALL OF `II-L's CITIES agree to pay to
the City of Torrance, acting in behalf of the South Bay Corridor Study
Steering Co=,.dttee, upon billing, one-third of the Study development costs
that exceed $240,000.
Participation in the cost of Study develop. -rent by all of the cities
shall be fir �ured on a proportionate basis of 1/3 population, 1/3 street
f-dleage, and 1/3 assessed valuation, except the City of Los Angeles, which
shall be figured on the basis of a proportion of the total of participating
cities.
All participating agencies shall provide, in addition -to the above
stated costs, a co�,bined total of *9,000 in staff resources or equivalent
services. The contribution of resources/services shall be figured on the
same proportionate basis as the dollar amounts described above.
I. F(JI'mDir, SOURCES & K17OUT-2s
io Allocation Amount
A. SLAG (Federal 80% �240,000
B. State of California (CALTRPUS)--1/3 of 205' 17,000
C. County of Los Angeles ---------- 1/3 of 201'0 17,000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
J Allocateion knou:.t
D. "Cities" of South of 20% $ 17,000
aow�t
r Los ,",n-:IeSof, 1/3
-------14.5'� of Dal. --- 2,3a1
E1 undo ------ - 6.8,,' `, � - _ 1,079
Iravatl zorne ,_.._-.....__. _.__ 8. 4 J „ „ _ 1, 333
I lemQs a Bch. -- ----- 3.1w_ " :, _ _-_ 119 2
Lai:mdale-------- 3 1 „ , 1192
Lomita ----------- 2.6;""� ;, „ _ 412
nratt� Bch. ----- 6.l „ „ ___ 968
az
Palos Verdes Est. -- 3.5" " - - 555
Poncho P. V.------- 7.6 „ , _._ 1,206
F!e-dorndo Bch. ------- 10.0'-f „ IT 1,537
Rollinrr Bills ----- 1.0 159
Roil. Hills Est. --- 1.3 -- 206
Torrance
E. Staff Pesources ("Cities", County & State) - --- 9,000
Total Prase -II Funding --- $300,000
---$60,000 (20%) minus ,r9,000 of Staff Resources = $51,000
---Based on 1/3 population, 1/3 road mileage, and
1/3 assessed valuation.
II. 71PI'ATIVE B'UL-GL"P (Subject
to Review)
Amount
A. Consultant (Technical study--18 mos.)-----------------
M200,000
B. Coordinator, Phase -II
(Est. 200.)
---------- ------
35,000
Sala-ry--------- —
---- $20,000
(4'1,000/mo.)
Car Alloy ?ante-------
1,500
( w75/7"-0.
4
Office------------
13500
($75/mo• )
P'none & ins. Serv. -- 1,000
($50/mo. )
Secretarial----------
8,000
($400/mo. }
Printir�; & Post.
---- 1,000
($50/no. )
iIlsc. Travel -------
1,000
($50/mo. )
I"ise. Expenses -----
1,000
( r50/mo. )
Total----$35,000
C. Steering Con-attee
_-----.___-_.__.
________-__ --
- - 3,000
Secretarial -----$
1,500
075/m . }
INise. Expenses ---
1,000
($50/mo. )
Printing & Post.
-- 500
(*?5/1m• )
Total --
$ 3,000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
,. 2 5
26
27
28
29
30
31
Amount
D.
Technical Co7miittee-------------------------- —------- —$
2,500
Secretarial --------- 1,500 (o75/1ao. )
Phone----------------- 500 ($25/mo. )
Printing & Post.----- 500 (125/m . )
Total ------ 2,500
E.
Citizen's Advisory Group -------------------------
2,500
Secretarial ---------$ 1,500 ($75/mo )
Phone ------------------ 500 ($25/mo. )
Printing & Post. ---- 500 (:125/mo. )
Total -- --a 2,500
F.
Subcormattees------- —---------- — -------- ----------- --
2,000
-Publicity----_-._.__ __t 1,000 ($50/mo. )
-Contracts & Funds--- 500 ($25/mo. )
-Legal--------- --- 500 (1125hro. )
Total '------ $ 2,000
G.
Report Distribution Cost ------- —---------------- -----
5,000
Preliminary
Final -- ---- 9)000
Total-45,000
11.
Additional Contractors, Study '.,Tork
and Supplemental Data Research-------------------
10,000
I.
Est. Accounting & Filing Costs-------____----_LL__-.----
3,000
(To City of Torrance-4150/mo.)
J.
Publicity & Carnnunity Relations--------------------------
2,000
K.
Contingency Fund-------------------------------------
2E,000
L.
In -find Services (Staff Resources),
"Cities", County &State----------------
° 000
Total Cost of Phase II Study--
0300,000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
X In -Kind Services (`o and Amount)
State of
(1/3 of total)
County of Los Angeles ----- $3,000
(1/3 of total)
"Cities"---- --- —--------
3,000
Total -----------*9,000
Note:
Bach agency shall be
obliZated to provide, in
addition, above listed
equivalent services. However,
any agency may provide a
greater amount at its
discretion.
{ Based on, same proportionate amount(5) as cash allocations.
Los Angaes----- -- $ 200
Carson------------- 406
El Segundo--------- 190
Gardena----------- 185
IIa,•rthorne----------- 235
Iiermosa. Bch.------- 87
I,awndale----------- 87
Lonna-------------- 73
Manhattan Bch.----- 171
Palos Verdes Est.-- 98
Rancho P. V.------- 213
Redondo Bch.------- 280
Rolling }tills------ 28
"Rolling Hills Est.- 50
Torrance----------- 697
Total--- $3,000
III. ADDITICY'iAL ITE' 7 S :
1. All Budgetary expenditures shall be subject to mview and control
by the Steering Comard.ttee, and the Steering Con-rittee shall also
have authority to transfer monies between accounts. If expenses
for any budgeted item exceed listed mmnthly maximum, payment must
be approved by Steering Coranittee and will be charged against
following month's amount.
2. The Coordinator shall have authority to expend up to $100 for
miscellaneous expenditures and to report all such expenditures
bacl; to the Steering Corrattee.
3. Monthly reports, or mom often if called for, shall be presented
to the Steering Coar,-Ittee by the Phase II Coordinator and the
Consultant regarding the prowess of the Study. In addition,
monthly treasurer's reports and subcommittee reports shall be
&Lven to the Steering Con.,dttee.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
EXHIBIT "B"
COTTUIIT1".P� ORGA"IIZATIM
Authority and responsibility to guide and execute this transportation
study will operate through a Steering Committee, Consultant, Technical
Committee and Coordinator.
S EEMEA CUM= (South Bay Corridor Study Steering Committee)
The Steering Committee shall consist of representatives of the South Bay
Cities; namely, th6 Cities of. Carson, El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, ller;nosa
Beach, Lat•mdale, Lomita, Los Angeles, �anzattan Beach, Palos Verdes Estates,
Rancho Palos Verdes, Redondo Beach, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Bstates'and
Torrance; representatives from the County of Los Angeles and the State
'impartment of Transportation.
This Comm ttee shall elect a Chairman who shall, in addition to presiding
at Committee meetings, serve as Chairman at Committee -sponsored public hearings.
The County, State, and each participating City of the Steering Committee
shall each have one vote.
''he Steering Committee shn11 have responsibility for selectinZ and
executing a contract for a Consultant, appointing a Coordinator, giving directi
to the Study, approving all expenditure of funds, establishing the Citizens
Advisory Group, conducting public hearings, reviewing and approving all report
Tnaterial before release, and releasing a final Phase II report.
Individual representatives to this Committee shall provide liaison between
the Cormu ttee and their agencies in matters requiring official action or major
decisions.
A Consultant shall be selected by the Steering Committee to conduct the
under direction and approval of the Steering Committee.
TECIDTICAL CO; c SLUE,
Die Technical Committee, which is responsible to the Steering Committee,
shall consist of members of participating agencies as necessary to provide
staff services and advice to the Steering Committee, except as othenUse
designated by the Steering Committee. The Technical Committee shall evaluate
pnDposed transportation systems and implementation plans and provide staff
service and expertise to the Study Director as required to conduct and develop
the study.
- 12 -
n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
CITI'-y?S l,T�VISO^Y GT-)rm
A Citizens Advisor, Group will be selected from reprasentatives of the
com-unity at large by the Steering Caapittee. Citizen:, Adis sory Group
activities and objectives will include advisin; the Stcerir�g Co ud ttee and
Consultant of relevant co:-. mity goals and concerns within the study area,
ravie.;ing progress reports and Senerel evaluation of the study.
C010FvI. 'WORL
lne Coordinator shall be appointed by, and be respaisible to, the Steering
Cm-flittee and shall provide liaison and coordination ariong the Steering
Co A ttee, Technical Co7z-;lttee and Consultant. He shall coordinate the efforts
of the various agencies, citizen groups, Consultant persormel and local
officials. He shall guide the progress of this Phase II Study, e;;�hasizing
recora-endations and, co_riclusiazs that were made in the Phase I Filial P:eport,
distribute reports as required by the Steering Cormdttee, and insure that all
material is sent to the appropriate agencies and committees in a tirrx-ly manner
to allow adequate tip for study.
— 13 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
EXI fiL3IT "C'r
T.ASI �S A 1D 1,MF ' PROGFA 1
T,NSK I DATA NUP BY COJSITUEP?al
7nis task will involve Gat 'nering the'information necessai-j to develop and
evaluate alternatives proposed to allevi ate, identified transportation
deficiencies in the South Bay area. 'Ibe car unity goals and objectives
identified in the Phase I Final Report will serve as the guidelines for this
task.
TASK II ENCOURAGE CTPIZ: a PARTICIPATIO,
'Phis task will require Steering CommAttee to conduct and publicize '
Con=i lty meetings for the purpose of solicitin the opinion of the private
sector. It is recognized that public opinion is an important part of this
study, and that this opinion should be reflected in the Phase II recca-rrrendations.
CASK III DEVELOPHI-IT OF AL`L,.RidATIVt'sS BY CO;?SUL'fX4T
This task will result in an impler-entation plan which includes local and
regional projects, and will include both short and long range plans, together
with cost estimates for the !.q)le;rentation plan and funding re cmyr)endat ions.
rASK IV IDENTIFY D71r;'T 7FATION FUMIidG SOURCES
Consultant will provide an overview of all potential sources of funds
and the amount of funds which rmigtit be available from all levels of government.
ASK V S`_UDY A-IALYSZS
Analysis by Consultant will utilize data developed from the Phase I Study,
recoi'mandations in the Final Report for Phase I, and other available data input
from agencies, citizen groups and coarnittees involved in Phase II. This analysis
will include an evaluation of all alternative tr u-1sportation plans and their
interrelatianshins which shall result in a reco,=., nded PLAPd. Presentation of a
recommended Transportation Plan as well as alternative plans, will be presented
to the Steering Corrmittee with criteria for evaluation.
TASK VI E; d dIRO,-ENT'PL I: •23ACr REPORT BY CO. ISUL'rA:.1T
In conformance with established guidelines, the EIR :oust be completed
aefore final approval of Phase II report by the Steering Cor.rdttee.
Enviromental assessments shall be a continuing process throuJ-iout the
tudy and should be reflected in all reports.
VII PRE1,11TINARY J3EPOW BY MASULINU
The preliminary report by Consultant will explain the rationale behind
mare a presentation at public meetings of the reco-rended Transportation
and -alternative plans. 12he Consultant shall supply and the Coordinator
1 be responsible for the distribution of 200 copies of the Prelindnary
rt as directed by the Steering Committee.
- 14 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
is
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
� 'I , , ,
TAS,T VIII PUBLIC i-TVU�is mD I'F7mir
PLIblic hearinE;ss aild/or as deei-nd necessary by t! Steelil-rz
GP -1-5 —yu i�---m i II
preliudnary r6j�`O -0 oc
e
C la-. )e pi
Consultant will be (�.7T fo-ris-at these
rA�Volic
hea
ring
i as necessary.
The pum,,ose of these hearings is to foi-orally advise the. public of the
"and
L In
Publicity and, advertising, notification of interested a,--ncies and
-66- tM - s 6hjjjb-Jrj-
�
re of the
1
�'oordinator n6YT56-.W f!.?®ry-C` -tt-
TA-Sir Dr, D-TUOEUATION, PLAN BY CON'SULTMr
Tiis task involves the propa-VatIon of a schedule of pemmp-nded
tmproverm- nts (short, intermediate, and long-ramr_e_ projects), aloe with a
die -ftnition of fund-IrZ levels acid sources, EnvirOrr-a-ntal Irloact p,��zports and
all other doom-ents whdch are deerird necessary by the Steering Committee in
order to bring the recari-ended Lip-rovenamts to fruition shall be fully
executed and included in the T-rplenrentation Plan.
TASK X FINAL RFPO:',P BY C,0,,',1SUTJTA:U (Subject to Approval of Steering Comittee)
All considerations raised in the public hearing,, shall be addressed in
the final report and, at the option of the Steering Camaittee, may be the
subject of further study or public hearings. Me Final Report shall represent
findings of the SteeringCormAttee. The Consultant shall supply and the
Coordinator shall be responsible for the distribution of 500 copies of the
-1.1nal R'er;ort as directed by the Steering Conrdttee. In addition, the Consultant
ahall supply a minima of 1,000 copies Of all executive SLM-Tlary of the Final
¢16eport, at the direction of the Steering CormAttee.
- 15 -
;1-
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
is
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
FAIR E.,TTIOTnEIP PRAGPICE'S
1. In the perfoirrnce of this contract, tie Contractor till not
discri-ftnate aig-r-a-Ist ai-,y CrT-Toyee or applic-'zit for because of race,
color, relivion, sex, mcestrZi, or national oriS.in. The Contractor will take
affir-mative action to ensure- that applicants ar-- employed and that eurloyees
are treated during i%7it1hout rer:ard to their race, color, religion,
sex, --nc / estl--j, or national ori-_cin. Such action shall include, but not be
limited to the follcrvtTirC.: e;.-ploy.iint, upGradnS, demotia) or transfer;
recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or tenaination.- rates of pay
or other forms of coiimensation as -id selection for training, including
apprenticeship. 'Ihe Contractor shall post in conspicuous places, available
to employees and applicants for e1q)loyment, notices to be provicle(I by the
State setting forth the provisions of this Fair TD-p..loyi=t Practices section.
2. The Contractor will permit access to his records of eaiolqywent,
er.,ployment advertisements, application forr-s, and other pertinent data and
records by the State Fair 1'.,,-ploym--nt Practice Commission, or any other agency
of the State of California desiCriated by the at-jardinj-, authority, for the
purposes of investigation to ascertain co.7-pliance with the Fair Ili-iiployup-rit
Practices section of this contract.
3. Remedies for Willfull Violations:'
(a) The State may determine a willful violation of the Fair
Fxivloyment Practices provision to have occurred upon
receipt of a final ju(IC-P-nt having that effect from a
court in an action to ifnich Contractor was a party or
upon receipt of a written notice frari the Fair E,-,TDloy-
Yiy-,nt Practices Coy ssion that it has investij.-,ated and
determined that the Contractor has violated the ]air
17-riployr-ent Practices Act and has issued an order, under
Labor Code Section 11126, whid-1 has beco,-ip- final, or
obtained an injunction under Labor Code Section 142()-
(b) For willful violation of this Fair Employment Practices
provision, the State shall have the ri_f-ht to ter mdnate
this contract either in v7hole or in part, and any loss
or da;-iaC-- sustained by the State in securing the Goods
or services hereunder shall be bode and paid for by
the Contractor and by his surety under the perfor-nPance
bond, if any, and the State may deduct from any monies
due or that thereafter may become due to the Contractor,
the difference beI7,7een the price naTed in the contract
and the actual cost thereof to the State.
- 16 -
I REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
1. Sou 13 Corridor Study Steering Committee. Councilman
Van Vranken reported that Phase II of the Study would identify actual
plans to overcome some of the transportation deficiencies in the South
Bay area and the consultant would recommend a series of options which
might be taken. Stated the Cost to El Segundo would amount to $1, 079,
and moved, seconded by Councilman Nagel, that funds be appropriated
from the Contingency Account for this purpose and that the following
resolution be adopted:
RESOLVED, that the South Day
Corridor (Transportation) Study, Phase ll:between
the State of California, County of Los An'getes,
City of Los Angeles and fourteen South Bay cities
for a corridor study, presented to this Council
on this date, be and the same is hereby approved,
and that after execution by each of the parties
concerned, a copy of said Agreement be placed
on file in the office of the City Clerk; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that
the Mayor be and he is hereby authorized to
sign for and on behalf of the City and the City
Clerk to attest the same,
Motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen Nagel, Rockhold, Stephens,
Van Vranken and Mayor Balmer;
Noes: Councilmen None;
Absent: Councilmen None.
COUNCIL MINUTES
June 3, 1975