CONTRACT 1368 Other07-Lh-I 23.9
07353 - 201700
Sepulveda Boulevard at,
Ronacrans Avanue
District Agreement No. 2941
THIS ACREEMnXVp MADE AMn 0MTSPV0 XNTO THIS
BY !,'3,F,"T0T*TN
ME
CITY OV EL SEPUNM
a body politic and a municipal
corporation of the State of
California, herninafter
referred to *a "CITY''
STATF OF CALIFORNIA,
acting by and throuqh its
Bustnewe and Tramportation
Agency, Department of Public
Works, Division of Hilhways,
hereinafter referred to as
"STATE''
„ EREAS , ° 'l.hATIP, alV"s:i, err %templatuiilR modifications
to interconnection system, traffic control signal OYMM and
safety liqhting am State Highway Rants 1, Sepulveda Boulevard
. Rosecrans Avenue, a portion of which In situatedwithin,
the City y of El Segundo, and desire to specify herein the
terms and conditiono under w"""If.ich salel !nmdificat:,ions are to 1, ,
constructed, financed and maintained.
NOW, a”" R"MORE a in. o,ill id a. aa of the covenants
and conditions herein contained, :.ed, the parties hereto agree
me follows-,
STATE AGREEM
SECTION �X
ra umunfy interconnection masystem a, traffic
control miqnal system and safety lighting at said intersec-
tion hereinbefore mentioned, through construction as part of
a,!s. contract with construction sctio contractor licensed hy the State
of Calirornill,a to providetraffic facilihiss
Highway Rautie 1 Ibeti,,"'ew""sn 21st Street in Hermosa Bench and
Resec an Avenue ""?nue El Segundo, said d contract to be carried
nut in accordance with provimions of the State Contract
,2
Act, Chapter 3, Fort 5, Division 3, Title 2 of the Government
Code, and work conpleted in conformity with plans and specifi-
cations of STRTE.
(2) To bear the entire expense of preparation of
plans and specifications, and STATE'S share of construction
engineering costs (including all direct and indirect costs
((functional and administrative ovarhead assessment)) attrib,,,,
utable to such work, applied in accordance with STATE'S
standard accounting procedures) and construction costs
requirad to capplate the modifications referred to harmin,
such share to he the entire cost of interconnection system
modifications and a portion of the cost of signal system and
safety lighting modifications at said intersection, nuOiL
portion to be based an the same proportion to the total cost
of modifications of signal system and safety—nighting at the
intersection an the numbor (2) of legs of highways under
jurisdiction of STATE at the intersection involved bears to
the total nuMer (4) of logo of highways at such intersection.
(3) To maintain and operate the interconnection
gyntem, traffic control signal system and safety lighting.
-3-
CT
SECTI " N I
(1) To deposit with STAM within 30 days of
immediately
receipt of billing therefor (whieb billing will be forwarde(,'!
following STATRIs bid advertising date of a
construction co'.ntra for the afares&i w modifications), the
.amount o 8 , 00 . which figure represents two-thirds partioof CITY'S estimated share of construction engineering costs
and construction costs required ta complete the modifications
,�"fi�lfrv: actual �m�+al amount w'"� G �a rTY' S share of construction
The
engineering 00sts (including all direct and indirect costs
((functinnal and administrative overhead assessmant))
attrib-
utable su h work, applied :I� accordance th STATE '
standard accounting procedures) and construction costs will
be determined Wer completion of work and a financial sattl&
me'.ui t made m POMM MY acCOUT tilig Of i * M 1r".s ., Said share will be
portion ti of the cost of traffic control signal system and
fety lighting
to be based an the same proportion to the total coot of traffic
control signal system and safety lighting modifications at the
-4,
intersection
an
the
number 1) of
o of highways
-
nder juristotal
diction
(4)
of
logo of highways
at such internection.
"u "�'��m unt.'s " STATE for� ITY' W�9n��P'��"���" ,. wW'�' uMt
u ilk �'� � "
share of the s of maintenance and operation o of the rat w
connection systemp traffic control mignal system and safety
lighting, such share to be determined In the manner provided
in that Agreemmnto maintenance State highways
the CITY which in in effect t the time said costs are
incarred. or if no such agreement exists, such share to be a
sum bearing the same proportion to the total cant of mninten,,,,
ance and operation of said intercannaction system, traffic
control signal system and afaty lighting as the rI w~wlmr (3
of logoof highways undo, °urind " on of the CITY bears
the total number ( he logo of highways ays at aid ,inter-
section.
SECTTON III.
(1)
That obligations of
STATE
under terMS Of tbia
Agreement
are subject
to
the allocation of funds by the
California
Highway comminsion.
(2) That nelth�?r S"]MR,"371"' nor any officer or erPIMO
t) iereof shall he responsible for any damage or liability
occ;urring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done
by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or
jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Rgreament. It Is
also understood and agreed thmt, "pursuant to navmrnment Code
Section 095.4, CITY shall fully indemnify and hold STATE
harmless from any liabillty imposed for injury (as defined
by Governnant Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of
anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated
to CITY under this AgreeTent.
(3) That neither CITY nor any officer Or employee
thereof, in responsible for any damage or liability occurring
by reason of anythinq done or omitted to be done by STATE
under or in connection w1th an!��r we)rR, authority Or Jurindic-
tion not delegated W CITY under this Agreement. It is also
understood and aqreed that, pursuant to Government Code
Section 895.4, STATr shall fully, 130"Irxmify Mnd 'hold (71TV
harmless from any liability imposed A injury (as defined
-6-
by Covernment Code Section 810.8) accurrinq by reason it
or
omitted to be done
in con
nection
with
any
work, authority or
JurisdictiOn nOt KAMM
to CZTT
under
this
Agreement.
(4) That, should any portion of the project be
financed with
Federal
Funda or State Gas Tax Funds all
applicable procadures
and policlan
relating to the use Of
such funds shall
apply
notwithstanding
other provisione Of
thiRya Agreement,
Im y17mmss wmwinr, the portion bareto have CaUS0102
this Agreement to be
executed by tht�dxi
("V � r Li CORI, 11,11,11, 15
duly authorized,
the
provisions
of
whIch higree.fie nt
Sre
eftective me
of the
day, month
and
year first herark
inabove
written.,
STAVE Or CALIFORNIA
Department of Public Works
Division of Hiq�%v,,oavx
State Highway Engineer
-8-
CITY OF El+ SEGMO
— e. .... ..,o. - .. -..
t'l;I,,�rn
Attest; JANE D. HOUGH
Cify"elo,rk
M-
uepuLy
(SEAL)
CI Y..-�TTG
COUNTY OF LOS ANQEL.,S"` .: f
ROAD DEPART;1tENNT
THO'MAS A. TIDEMANSON, Road Commissioner
DONALD G. DREHER, Chief Deputy
1540 ALCAZAR STREET_ , [[, ,� ,{�{
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 50033, I '.I:. i I; 1 �J • I
Telephone 22 6 - 9111
February 25, 1981 . „" -
ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO:
P.O. Box 4089
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90051
Honorable Board of Supervisors
County of Los Angeles
383 Hall of Administration
Dear Supervisors:
IN REPLY PLEASE p_5/16A
REFER TO PI'LV
815.2
RELINQUISHMENT OF JURISDICTION A14D
RESCISSION OF -JURISDICTION REQUEST
ROSECRANS AVENUE AND CRENSHAW BOULEVARD
CASH CONTRACT NOS. 2353, 2389, 3314,
3393, 4410, 40979, 41207 AND 41616 (2905)
CITIES OF BELLFLOWER, COMPTON, DOWNEY,
EL SEGUNDO, GARDENA, HAWTHORNE, LA MIRADA,
LAI,R4DALE , LOS ANGELES, MANHATTAN BEACH,
NORWALK, PARAMOUNT AND SANTA FE SPRINGS
SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2 A14D 4
R-1860-83365; R-5326500102; R-89-67-73;
R-85437; R-88133
REC01',LMENDATION :
That your Honorable Board adopt the attached
Resolution in the form previously approved by
County Counsel.
On various occasions, your Honorable Board declared
portions of Rosecrans Avenue between Highland Avenue
and Beach Boulevard and various intersecting streets
within the Cities indicated in the following listing
of pertinent Board actions to be a part of the County
System of Highways -for the purpose of acquiring rights
of way and/or constructing improvements thereon.
ADOPTED
BOARD OF SUPS VISORS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
2
MAR 10 1981
t °}'
1AMES S. MIZE
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Honorable Board of Supervisors -2- February 25, 1981
Synopsis
Date Number Cities
June 28, 1966 None E1 Segundo and Manhattan Beach
Apr. 30, 1968 None Paramount
Jan.-30, 1973 90 Bellflower, Compton, Downey,
El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne,
La Mirada, Lawndale, Los Angeles,
Manhattan Beach, Norwalk, Paramount,
and Santa Fe Springs
Aug- 13, 1.974 80 Compton
Nov. 20, 1979 58 Hawthorne
May 6, 1980 64 Gardena
The above mentioned Cities, with the exception of the City of Norwalk,
consented t0 the Cc= y taking jurisdiction as required under the
provisions of the Streets and Highways Code. Subsequent to the
January 30, 1973 Board Resolution, the proposed work within the City
of Norwalk was deleted from cur project at the City's request and,
therefore, 7Norwalk's consent was not required.
In addition, in a Resolution adopted by your Honorable Board on
March 30, 1971, Synopsis No. 106, various streets in the Cities of
El Segundo, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Lawndale, Manhattan Beach,..
Redondo Beach and Torrance in the South Bay area, which included a
portion of Rosecrans Avenue, were declared to be a part of the County
System of :=ighways for the purposes of constructing and maintaining
the computerized South Bay traffic signal control system.
Thereafter, improvements were completed for portions of Rosecrans
Avenue and on June 8, 1971, Synopsis No. 110, your Honorable Board
adopted a Resolution relinquishing jurisdiction for that portion of
Rosecrans Avenue between Alma Avenue and Aviation Boulevard within
the City of MIanhattan Beach.
Furthermore, on October 17, 1972, Synopsis No. 67, your Honorable
Board adopted a Resolution declaring a portion of Crenshaw Boulevard
within the Cities of Gardena, Hawthorne, Inglewood, Lomita, Rolling
Hills Estates and Torrance, which included the Rosecrans Avenue and
Crenshaw Boulevard intersection, to be.a-part of the County System
of Highways for the purpose of modifying and interconnecting traffic
control signals and appurtenant work thereon.
Later, on June 8, 1976, Synopsis No. 87, your.IIonorable Board adopted
a Resolution relinquishing Jurisdictionon portions of Crenshaw
Boulevard within the Cities of Gardena, Hawthorne, Inglewood, Lomita,
iionc,rable Board of Supervisors
-3- February 25., 1981
Rolling Hills Estates and Torrance. However, several intersections,
including Rosecrans Avenue within the Cities of Gardena and Hawthorne,
were retained for future projects.
111ow, since all improvements commenced by the County of Los Angeles
in connection with the Rosecrans Avenue projects and the intersection
of Crenshaw Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue have been completed, it is
no longer necessary that the County retain jurisdiction over all
portions of Posecrans Avenue and Crenshaw Boulevard for right of way
acquisition and improvement purposes. However, jurisdiction is still
required at the intersection of .Rosecrans Avenue and Hawthorne
Boulevard f:or a current. S.T.C. project and at the intersections of
Rosecrans revenue wi}h_Atlantic Avenue and Bellflower Boulevard for
.traffic signal timing adjustments, as well as retention of jurisdiction
for ongoing maintenance of the South Bay Computerized Traffic Signal
Control System. The_e.fore, the attached Resolution relinquishes
jurisdiction along Rosecrans Avenue except as noted above, relinquishes
jurisdiction at the intersection of Crenshaw Boulevard and Rosecrans
Avenue and rescinds t?ne portion of the Resolution of January 30, 1973
declaring the portion of Rosecrans Avenue within the City of Norwalk tc
be a part of the County System of Highways.
Capon the : l"ootion of this Resolution, please transmit one certified
copy to tu.a `,ity Cl r-:s of the Cities of Bellflower, Compton, Downey,
El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, La Mirada, Lawndale, Los Angeles,
Manhattan Beach, "Aowal, paramount, and Santa Fe Springs.
Respectfully submitted,.
Y '
T. A. TIDEMANSON
Road Commissioner
BA:sml/16A
Attach.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
i
City of El Segundo
RESOLUTION DECLARING PORTIONS OF
ROSECRANS AVENUE
IN THE CITIES O.F BELLFLOWER, COMPTON, DOWNEY, EL SEGUNDO,
GARDENA, HAWTHORNE, LA IIIRADA, LAWNDALE, LOS ANGELES,
MANHATTAN BEACH, PARAMOUNT AND SANTA FE SPRINGS
AND CRENSHAW BOULEVARD
IN THE CITIES OF GARDENA AND HAWTHORNE
NO LONGER TO BE A PART OF THE COUNTY SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS
A23D. RESCINDING FORMER ACTION DECLARING THE PORTION OF
ROSECRANS AVE14UE IN THE CITY OF NORWALK
TO BE A PART OF THE COUNTY SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS
WHEREAS, by Resolutions heretofore adopted, those portions of
Rosecrans Avenue hetween Highland Avenue and Beach Boulevard within
the Cities of B-11flower, Compton, Downey, El Segundo, Gardena,
Hawthorne, La Virada, Lawndale, Los Angeles, rianhattan Beach,
Norwalk, Paramount and Santa Fe Springs and Crenshaw Boulevard
at Rosecrans Avenue within the Cities of Gardena and Hawthorne,
County of Los Angel -es,- State of California, have been declared by
the Board of Supervisors of said County to be a part of the County
System of Highways pursuant to the provisions of Sections 1700 to
1704 inclusive of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California for certain purposes; and
WHEREAS, the above mentioned Cities, with the exception of
the Citv of Norwalk, subsequently consented to the County taking
jurisdiction as required by Section 1701 of the -aforementioned
Code; and
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, that portion of the proposed project on Rosecrans
Avenue within the City of Norwalk was subsequently deleted and,
therefore, Norwalk'-s consent to jurisdiction was no longer
required; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution heretofore adopted, a portion of
Rosecrans Avenue within the City of Manhattan Beach for which
jurisdiction had previously been acquired was declared no longer
to be a part of the County System of Highways; and
WHEREAS, with the exceptions as"noted below, those purposes
for which jurisdiction was granted have now been accomplished
and it is no lonaer necessary to retain jurisdiction over all
portions of the herein described highways;
�JOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors
of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, that those
portions of Rosecrans Avenue between Highland Avenue and Beach
Boulevard and intersecting streets appurtenant to the construction
thereof within the Cities of Bellflower, Compton, Downey,
E1 Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, La Mirada, Lawndale, Los Angeles,
Manhattan Beach, Paramount and Santa Fe Springs are hereby declared
not to be a part of the County Systemm of Highways of said County,
except for the intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and Hawthorne
Boulevard within the City of Hawthorne for the signal modification
project now under construction and the intersections of Rosecrans
Avenue and Atlantic Avenue within the City of Compton and Rosecrans
Avenue and Bellflower Boulevard within the City of Bellflower for
traffic signal timing adjustments.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Los Angeles, State of California, that Crenshaw Boulevard
-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
between 100 feet north of Rosecrans Avenue and 100 feet south
of Rosecrans Avenue within the Cities of Gardena and Hawthorne
are hereby declared not to be a part of the County System of
Highways of said County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Resolution of March 30, 1971
Synopsis No. 106, which declared various streets in the Cities of
E1 Segundo, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach,'Lawndale, Manhattan beach,
Redondo Beach and Torrance in the South Bay area, including a
portion of Rosecrans Avenue, to be a, part of ,the County System of
Highways for the purpose of maintaining a computerized traffic
signal control system shall remain in full force and effect until
otherwise declareu.
BE IT FURTH_R RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Los Angeles, State of California, that the portion of
the Resolution of January 30, 1973, Synopsis No. 90, declaring that
portion of Rosecrans Avenue within the City of Norwalk to be a part
of the County System of Highways is hereby rescinded.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution will be effective
ten days after filing with the City Clerks of the Cities of Bellflower,
Compton, Downey, El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, La Mirada, Lawndale,
Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach; Paramount and Santa Fe Springs.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
El
9
10
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
County of Los Angeles ) s.s.
I, JAMES S. MIZE, Executive Officer -Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, do hereby certify
that the attached is a full, true and correct copy of a
Resolution adopted on —MQ,XQ 1(3 1 10LO
by the Board, of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, and
ex officio the governing body of all other special assessment and
taxing districts for which said Board so acts.
I Of LOSS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
hand and affixed My seal of the County of
`.�� Los Angeles this day of�, �,19��
a �" JAMES S. MIZE, Executive Officer -Clerk of
°+ the Board of Supervisors of the County of
� Los Angeles.
"'
'iFO + � By
Deputy
I