Loading...
CONTRACT 1380 Other911 -1111 S2 AqAEhiMZ 1,6so THIS AGEHIUITP made and entered into by the CITY OF EL SEGUND(F. 0 a municipal corporation in the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and the COLUIY OF LOS ANGELES, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY": �,5!LiZBV�S, Rosecrans. Avenue within CITY 'S boundaries is on CITY !S Select Sy atem of Streets and on COUNTY'S Master Plan of Highways; and 10E,111HIAS, CITY and COUNTY propose to upgrade SMJ, modify i;ral'fic signals on Rosecrans Avenne wholly or partially arithin CITY'S boundaries, which work is hereinafter referred to as PROJECT; and WHEREAS, PROJECT is in the general interest of CITY and GO"J."'N"i"Y; and I'll'i"�-11�A"W,rsl'!""S' and. OXYKINT"T are willing to sharo in, PROJECT COSTS; and 7101KIEASS PROJECT has been submitted to the State of GalifOrnia fO3" approval for TOPICS financing; and. WSERBAN C(.)',.y1))Ty.Proposes to use COUNTY TOPICS fvinds a.5 CITY fL�-, d ,I 1.ieu of on. cat Lon of Urban funds to CITY,, share of FROJECT CO�`�`,'-13 i� in consideration of the antual benefits to be derived by CITY ol-ki iT17 , wjd of the premises herein coutained, it is hereby agro&1 ae 10110wo, (I" CITY AGRKS UPOY! COMP10t0n Of 0:3'.+ ol" 20 COUNTY'S jurisdiction for construction purposes, to continue to maintain or cause to be maintainedo in good condition and at its own proportionate expense., all improvements constructed as part of PROJECT and wholly or partially within its jurisdiction. (2) COUNTY AGREES: a. To prepare plans, specifications and cost estlyjmtes, and to famish construction engineering and administration for PROJECT., all at no cost to CITY. b. To obtain approval from CITY of plans and cost estimates for PROJECT prior to advertising for construction contract bids. a. To advertise PROJECT for construction contract bids, to award P-nd -v5,-,,,q0,,X)Aster the construction contract, to do all thingg necessary and proper to complete PROJECT and to act in beh&32. 0 41 r-rrPV jX ft1l negotiations pertairLng thereto. d. To use Four Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($4,700) of e. To pay all PROJECT COSTS in o,.xcess of the omount herein set forth as CITY'S share, utilizing marbrom T,OPICS financing. (3) IT IS MUTUALLY LYNDER-STOOD AND AGR='D AS FO11Q1--V I 1. PROJECT COSTS as referred to isi this Agreement shall consiog of the costs of required materia:Ls,, construction and all other work necessary to upgrade and/or modify the traffic $ signals on Rosecrans Avenue within the boundaries of CITY in accordance with approved plans. b. If PROJECT is not approved for TOPICS financing., this Agreement shall be considered null and void. c. The expenditure of TOPICS funds in CITY by COUNTY represents a portion of CITY IS theoretiop-1 entitlement of Urban funds in accordance vrith the Urban Fund Procedures adopted by the Board of Supervisors on June 13., 1972. d. This Agreement shall not take effect unless and until COUNTY, pursuant to Section 1700 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, declares Rosecrans Avenue within CITY boundaries to be a COUNTY highway for construction of improvements thereon and CITY, pursuant to Section 1701'of aforementioned Code., shall consent to said street becoming a COUNTY highway for said purpose. e. 1.1either COUNTY nor any officer or employee of COUNTY shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of an;yrthing done or omit -Led to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this kgreement, it is also understood and agreed that,, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4,, CITY shall fully inderaiify2 defend and hold COUNTY harTaess from, any -JL7-viposed for inj=,,,r \fa,,j dofin_-d by Government Code Section 8,10,8) occuxring by reason of c-uny'l---hind; done or o,70_tted. ME to be done ,. CITY underin connection with any authority or jurisdiction delegated .- Agreement. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee . CITY shall be responsible for any d&-aa&,,e or liability occurring by reaBol of anything done or omitted to be done by COUNTY under or . connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY under this Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that; pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, COUNTY shall fully indemnify, defend and hold CITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of �inythirg done or omitted to be done by COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority or ,jurisdiction delegated to COUM1."� under this Agreement. { --5— IN WITNESS WHEREOF., the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers, duly authorized by the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO on Aril 9 1973 , and by the COUNTY OF LOS ",�� s,. .� ANGELES on ��..11973. ATTEST: JAMES S. MIZE EXECUTIVE OFFICER. -CLERK OF ATTEST: y COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BY� "� CHAIRiUj BOARD OF i, Om m CITY OF EL SEGUNDO BY _,W.. a yor (SEAL) ADOPTED 'BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COU" Of LOS ANGELES r 2..2 JUL 24 1973 10 p� .41, APPROVED AS TO FORM John D. Mahsrg County c� � "� r BY COUNTY OF LOS ANCIELK=_. *" ROAD DEPARTMENT THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Road Commissioner DONALD G. DREHER, Chief Deputy 1540 LOS ANGELES, ALIIFO NIAT�06364AR G. I' P J.• I y Telephone 22 6 - 8111 February 25 , 1981` :� DbI£E S ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO; P.O. Box 4089 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90051 Honorable Board of Supervisors INREPLY PLE14E'E P-5/16A REFER TO FI.LV County of Los Angeles 815.2 383 Hall of Administration Dear Supervisors: RELINQUISHMENT OF JURISDICTION AND RESCISSION OF -JURISDICTION REQUEST ROSECRANS AVENUE AND CRENSHAW BOULEVARD CASH CONTRACT NOS. 2353, 2389, 3314, 3393, 4410, 40979, 41207 AND 41616 (2905) CITIES OF BELLFLOWER, COMPTON, DOWNEY, EL SEGUNDO, GARDENA, HAWTHORNE, LA MIRADA, LAWNDALE, LOS ANGELES, MANHATTAN BEACH, NORWALK, PARAMOUNT AND SANTA FE SPRINGS SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4 R-1860-83365; R-5326500102; R-89-67-73; R-85437; R-88133 RECOMMENDATION: That your Honorable Board adopt the attached Resolution in the form previously approved by County Counsel. On various occasions, your Honorable Board declared portions of Rosecrans Avenue between Highland Avenue and Beach Boulevard and various intersecting streets within the Cities indicated in the following listing of pertinent Board actions to be a part of the County System of Highways -for the purpose of acquiring rights of way and/or constructing improvements thereon. ADOPTED BOARD OF SU.PENVISORS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 2 MAR 10 1981 4 „ ^ JAMES S. MIZE EXECUTIVE OFFICER Honorable Board of Supervisors -2- February 25, 1981 Synopsis Date Number Cities June 28, 1966 None E1 Segundo and Manhattan Beach Apr. 30, 1968 None Paramount Jan. 30, 1973 90 Bellflower, Compton, Downey, E1 Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, La Mirada, Lawndale, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, Norwalk, Paramount, and Santa Fe Springs Aug. 13, 1974 80 Compton Nov. 20, 1979 58 Hawthorne May 6, 1980 64 Gardena The above mentioned Cities, with the exception of the City of Norwalk, consented to the County taking jurisdiction as required under the provisions of the Streets and Highways Code. Subsequent to the January 30, 1973 Board Resolution, the proposed work within the City of Norwalk was deleted from our project at the City's request and, therefore, Norwalk's consent was not required. In addition, in a Resolution adopted by your Honorable Board on March 30, 1971, Synopsis No. 106, various streets in the Cities of E1 Segundo, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Lawndale, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach and Torrance in the South Bay area, which included a portion of Rosecrans Avenue, were declared to be a part of the County System of Highways for the purposes of constructing and maintaining the computerized South Bay traffic signal control system. Thereafter, improvements were completed for portions of Rosecrans Avenue and on June 8, 1971, Synopsis No. 110, your Honorable Board adopted a Resolution relinquishing jurisdiction for that portion of Rosecrans Avenue between Alma Avenue and Aviation Boulevard within the City of Manhattan Beach. Furthermore, on October 17, 1972, Synopsis No. 67, your Honorable Board adopted a Resolution declaring a portion of Crenshaw Boulevard within the Cities of Gardena, Hawthorne, Inglewood, Lomita, Rolling Hills Estates and Torrance, which included the Rosecrans Avenue and Crenshaw Boulevard intersection, to be.a-part of the County System of Highways for the purpose -of modifying and interconnecting traffic control signals and appurtenant work thereon. Later, on June 8, 1976, Synopsis No. 87, your.Honorable Board adopted a Resolution relinquishing jurisdiction on portions of Crenshaw Boulevard within the Cities of Gardena, Hawthorne, Inglewood, Lomita, Honorable Board of Supervisors Rolling Hills Estates and Torrance. including Rosecrans Avenue within the were retained for future projects. -3- February 25, 1981 However, several intersections, Cities of Gardena and Hawthorne, Now, since all improvements commenced by the County of Los Angeles in connection with the Rosecrans Avenue projects and the intersection of Crenshaw Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue have been completed, it is no longer necessary that the County retain jurisdiction over all portions of Rosecrans Avenue and Crenshaw Boulevard for right of way acquisition and improvement purposes. However, jurisdiction is still required at the intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and Hawthorne Boulevard for a current U.T.C. project and at the intersections of Rosecrans Avenue wi-th Atlantic Avenue and Bellflower Boulevard for .traffic signal timing adjustments, as well as retention of jurisdiction for ongoing maintenance of the South Bay Computerized Traffic Signal Control System. Therefore, the attached Resolution relinquishes jurisdiction along Rosecrans Avenue except as noted above, relinquishes jurisdiction at the intersection of Crenshaw Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue and rescinds the portion of the Resolution of January 30, 1973 declaring the portion of Rosecrans Avenue within the City of Norwalk to be a part of the County System of Highways. Upon the adoption of this Resolution, please transmit one certified copy to the City Clerks of the Cities of Bellflower, Compton, Downey, El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, La Mirada, Lawndale, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, Norwalk, Paramount, and Santa Fe Springs. Respectfully submitted,. b T. A. TIDEMANSON Road Commissioner BA:sml/16A Attach. 1 2 3 4 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 PA,.] City of El Segundo RESOLUTION DECLARING PORTIONS OF ROSECRANS AVENUE IN THE CITIES OF BELLFLOWER, COMPTON, DOWNEY, EL SEGUNDO, GARDENA, HAWTHORNE, LA MIRADA, LAWNDALE, LOS ANGELES, MANHATTAN BEACH, PARAMOUNT AND SANTA FE SPRINGS AND CRENSHAW BOULEVARD IN THE CITIES OF GARDENA AND HAWTHORNE NO LONGER TO BE A PART OF THE COUNTY SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS AND RESCINDING FORMER ACTION DECLARING THE PORTION OF ROSECRANS AVENUE IN THE CITY OF NORWALK TO BE A PART OF THE COUNTY SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS WHEREAS, by Resolutions heretofore adopted, those portions of Rosecrans Avenue between Highland Avenue and Beach Boulevard within the Cities of Bellflower, Compton, Downey, E1 Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, La Mirada, Lawndale, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, Norwalk, Paramount and Santa Fe Springs and Crenshaw Boulevard at Rosecrans Avenue within the Cities of Gardena and Hawthorne, County of Los Angeles, State of California, have been declared by the Board of Supervisors of said County to be a part of the County System of Highways pursuant to the provisions of Sections 1700 to 1704 inclusive of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California for certain purposes; and WHEREAS, the above mentioned Cities, with the exception of the City of Norwalk, subsequently consented to the County taking jurisdiction as required by Section 1701 of the aforementioned Code; and 190 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, that portion of the proposed project on Rosecrans Avenue within the City of Norwalk was subsequently deleted and, therefore, Norwalk'-s consent to jurisdiction was no longer required; and WHEREAS, by Resolution heretofore adopted, a portion of Rosecrans Avenue within the City of Manhattan Beach for which jurisdiction had previously been acquired was declared no longer to be a part of the County System of Highways; and WHEREAS, with the exceptions as noted below, those purposes for which jurisdiction was granted have now been accomplished and it is no longer necessary to retain jurisdiction over all portions of the herein described highways; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, that those portions of Rosecrans Avenue between Highland Avenue and Beach Boulevard and intersecting streets appurtenant to the construction_ thereof within the Cities of Bellflower, Compton, Downey, E1 Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, La Mirada, Lawndale, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, Paramount and Santa Fe Springs are hereby declared not to be a part of the County System of Highways of said County, except for the intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and Hawthorne Boulevard within the City of Hawthorne for the signal modification project now under construction and the intersections of Rosecrans Avenue and Atlantic Avenue within the City of Compton and Rosecrans Avenue and Bellflower Boulevard within the City of Bellflower for traffic signal timing adjustments. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, that Crenshaw Boulevard -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 W between 100 feet north of Rosecrans Avenue and 100 feet south of Rosecrans Avenue within the Cities of Gardena and Hawthorne are hereby declared not to be a part of the County System of Highways of said County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Resolution of March 30, 1971 Synopsis No. 106, which declared various streets in the Cities of E1 Segundo, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach,'Lawndale, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach and Torrance in the South Bay area, including a portion of Rosecrans Avenue, to be a part of the County System of Highways for the purpose of maintaining a computerized traffic signal control system shall remain in full force and effect until otherwise declared. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, that the portion of the Resolution of January 30, 1973, Synopsis No. 90, declaring that portion of Rosecrans Avenue within the City of Norwalk to be a part of the County System of Highways is hereby rescinded. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution will be effective ten days after filing with the City Clerks of the Cities of Bellflower, Compton, Downey, El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, La Mirada, Lawndale, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, Paramount and Santa Fe Springs. 1 2 3 4 67 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 t&l 04-11 I,I STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) VCounty of Los Angeles ) s.s. I, JAMES S. MIZE, Executive Officer -Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, do hereby certify that the attached is a full, true and correct copy of a Resolution adopted on -TA Q,Mk 10 1 ja$I by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, and ex officio the governing body of all other special assessment and taxing districts for which said Board so acts. N� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I LOB have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal of the County of Los Angeles thisday of ,19 # ,+ JAMES S. MIZE, Executive Officer -Clerk of hawthe Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles. B y-_.- 15eputy.._.._.-.�...�...��..�-.�.-_.-