CONTRACT 1380 Other911 -1111 S2
AqAEhiMZ 1,6so
THIS AGEHIUITP made and entered into by the CITY OF EL SEGUND(F.
0
a municipal corporation in the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter referred
to as "CITY", and the COLUIY OF LOS ANGELES, a political subdivision of
the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY":
�,5!LiZBV�S, Rosecrans. Avenue within CITY 'S boundaries is on CITY !S
Select Sy atem of Streets and on COUNTY'S Master Plan of Highways; and
10E,111HIAS, CITY and COUNTY propose to upgrade SMJ, modify i;ral'fic signals
on Rosecrans Avenne wholly or partially arithin CITY'S boundaries, which
work is hereinafter referred to as PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, PROJECT is in the general interest of CITY and GO"J."'N"i"Y; and
I'll'i"�-11�A"W,rsl'!""S' and. OXYKINT"T are willing to sharo in, PROJECT COSTS; and
7101KIEASS PROJECT has been submitted to the State of GalifOrnia fO3"
approval for TOPICS financing; and.
WSERBAN C(.)',.y1))Ty.Proposes to use COUNTY TOPICS fvinds a.5 CITY fL�-, d
,I 1.ieu of on. cat Lon of Urban funds to CITY,,
share of FROJECT CO�`�`,'-13 i�
in consideration of the antual benefits to be derived
by CITY ol-ki iT17 , wjd of the premises herein coutained, it is hereby agro&1
ae 10110wo,
(I" CITY AGRKS UPOY! COMP10t0n Of 0:3'.+ ol"
20
COUNTY'S jurisdiction for construction purposes, to continue
to maintain or cause to be maintainedo in good condition and
at its own proportionate expense., all improvements constructed
as part of PROJECT and wholly or partially within its
jurisdiction.
(2) COUNTY AGREES:
a. To prepare plans, specifications and cost estlyjmtes, and
to famish construction engineering and administration for
PROJECT., all at no cost to CITY.
b. To obtain approval from CITY of plans and cost estimates for
PROJECT prior to advertising for construction contract bids.
a. To advertise PROJECT for construction contract bids, to award
P-nd -v5,-,,,q0,,X)Aster the construction contract, to do all thingg
necessary and proper to complete PROJECT and to act in beh&32.
0 41 r-rrPV jX ft1l negotiations pertairLng thereto.
d. To use Four Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($4,700) of
e. To pay all PROJECT COSTS in o,.xcess of the omount herein set
forth as CITY'S share, utilizing marbrom T,OPICS financing.
(3) IT IS MUTUALLY LYNDER-STOOD AND AGR='D AS FO11Q1--V
I
1. PROJECT COSTS as referred to isi this Agreement shall consiog
of the costs of required materia:Ls,, construction and all other
work necessary to upgrade and/or modify the traffic $
signals on Rosecrans Avenue within the boundaries of CITY
in accordance with approved plans.
b. If PROJECT is not approved for TOPICS financing., this
Agreement shall be considered null and void.
c. The expenditure of TOPICS funds in CITY by COUNTY represents
a portion of CITY IS theoretiop-1 entitlement of Urban funds
in accordance vrith the Urban Fund Procedures adopted by the
Board of Supervisors on June 13., 1972.
d. This Agreement shall not take effect unless and until COUNTY,
pursuant to Section 1700 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California, declares Rosecrans Avenue within
CITY boundaries to be a COUNTY highway for construction of
improvements thereon and CITY, pursuant to Section 1701'of
aforementioned Code., shall consent to said street becoming a
COUNTY highway for said purpose.
e. 1.1either COUNTY nor any officer or employee of COUNTY shall
be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason
of an;yrthing done or omit -Led to be done by CITY under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated
to CITY under this kgreement, it is also understood and agreed
that,, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4,, CITY shall
fully inderaiify2 defend and hold COUNTY harTaess from, any
-JL7-viposed for inj=,,,r \fa,,j dofin_-d by Government Code
Section 8,10,8) occuxring by reason of c-uny'l---hind; done or o,70_tted.
ME
to be done ,. CITY underin connection with any
authority or jurisdiction delegated .-
Agreement.
Neither CITY nor any officer or employee .
CITY shall be
responsible for any d&-aa&,,e or liability occurring by reaBol
of anything done or omitted to be done by COUNTY under or .
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated
to COUNTY under this Agreement. It is also understood and
agreed that; pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4,
COUNTY shall fully indemnify, defend and hold CITY harmless
from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government
Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of �inythirg done or
omitted to be done by COUNTY under or in connection with any
work, authority or ,jurisdiction delegated to COUM1."� under
this Agreement.
{
--5—
IN WITNESS WHEREOF., the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to
be executed by their respective officers, duly authorized by the CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO on Aril 9 1973 , and by the COUNTY OF LOS
",�� s,. .�
ANGELES on ��..11973.
ATTEST: JAMES S. MIZE
EXECUTIVE OFFICER. -CLERK OF
ATTEST:
y
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
BY� "�
CHAIRiUj BOARD OF i, Om m
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
BY
_,W.. a
yor
(SEAL) ADOPTED
'BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COU" Of LOS ANGELES
r 2..2
JUL 24 1973
10
p� .41,
APPROVED AS TO FORM
John D. Mahsrg
County c�
� "�
r
BY
COUNTY OF LOS ANCIELK=_. *"
ROAD DEPARTMENT
THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Road Commissioner
DONALD G. DREHER, Chief Deputy
1540 LOS ANGELES, ALIIFO NIAT�06364AR G. I' P J.• I y
Telephone 22 6 - 8111
February 25 , 1981` :�
DbI£E S ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO;
P.O. Box 4089
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90051
Honorable Board of Supervisors INREPLY PLE14E'E P-5/16A
REFER TO FI.LV
County of Los Angeles 815.2
383 Hall of Administration
Dear Supervisors:
RELINQUISHMENT OF JURISDICTION AND
RESCISSION OF -JURISDICTION REQUEST
ROSECRANS AVENUE AND CRENSHAW BOULEVARD
CASH CONTRACT NOS. 2353, 2389, 3314,
3393, 4410, 40979, 41207 AND 41616 (2905)
CITIES OF BELLFLOWER, COMPTON, DOWNEY,
EL SEGUNDO, GARDENA, HAWTHORNE, LA MIRADA,
LAWNDALE, LOS ANGELES, MANHATTAN BEACH,
NORWALK, PARAMOUNT AND SANTA FE SPRINGS
SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4
R-1860-83365; R-5326500102; R-89-67-73;
R-85437; R-88133
RECOMMENDATION:
That your Honorable Board adopt the attached
Resolution in the form previously approved by
County Counsel.
On various occasions, your Honorable Board declared
portions of Rosecrans Avenue between Highland Avenue
and Beach Boulevard and various intersecting streets
within the Cities indicated in the following listing
of pertinent Board actions to be a part of the County
System of Highways -for the purpose of acquiring rights
of way and/or constructing improvements thereon.
ADOPTED
BOARD OF SU.PENVISORS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
2 MAR 10 1981
4
„ ^ JAMES S. MIZE
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Honorable Board of Supervisors -2-
February 25, 1981
Synopsis
Date Number Cities
June 28, 1966 None E1 Segundo and Manhattan Beach
Apr. 30, 1968 None Paramount
Jan. 30, 1973 90 Bellflower, Compton, Downey,
E1 Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne,
La Mirada, Lawndale, Los Angeles,
Manhattan Beach, Norwalk, Paramount,
and Santa Fe Springs
Aug. 13, 1974 80 Compton
Nov. 20, 1979 58 Hawthorne
May 6, 1980 64 Gardena
The above mentioned Cities, with the exception of the City of Norwalk,
consented to the County taking jurisdiction as required under the
provisions of the Streets and Highways Code. Subsequent to the
January 30, 1973 Board Resolution, the proposed work within the City
of Norwalk was deleted from our project at the City's request and,
therefore, Norwalk's consent was not required.
In addition, in a Resolution adopted by your Honorable Board on
March 30, 1971, Synopsis No. 106, various streets in the Cities of
E1 Segundo, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Lawndale, Manhattan Beach,
Redondo Beach and Torrance in the South Bay area, which included a
portion of Rosecrans Avenue, were declared to be a part of the County
System of Highways for the purposes of constructing and maintaining
the computerized South Bay traffic signal control system.
Thereafter, improvements were completed for portions of Rosecrans
Avenue and on June 8, 1971, Synopsis No. 110, your Honorable Board
adopted a Resolution relinquishing jurisdiction for that portion of
Rosecrans Avenue between Alma Avenue and Aviation Boulevard within
the City of Manhattan Beach.
Furthermore, on October 17, 1972, Synopsis No. 67, your Honorable
Board adopted a Resolution declaring a portion of Crenshaw Boulevard
within the Cities of Gardena, Hawthorne, Inglewood, Lomita, Rolling
Hills Estates and Torrance, which included the Rosecrans Avenue and
Crenshaw Boulevard intersection, to be.a-part of the County System
of Highways for the purpose -of modifying and interconnecting traffic
control signals and appurtenant work thereon.
Later, on June 8, 1976, Synopsis No. 87, your.Honorable Board adopted
a Resolution relinquishing jurisdiction on portions of Crenshaw
Boulevard within the Cities of Gardena, Hawthorne, Inglewood, Lomita,
Honorable Board of Supervisors
Rolling Hills Estates and Torrance.
including Rosecrans Avenue within the
were retained for future projects.
-3- February 25, 1981
However, several intersections,
Cities of Gardena and Hawthorne,
Now, since all improvements commenced by the County of Los Angeles
in connection with the Rosecrans Avenue projects and the intersection
of Crenshaw Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue have been completed, it is
no longer necessary that the County retain jurisdiction over all
portions of Rosecrans Avenue and Crenshaw Boulevard for right of way
acquisition and improvement purposes. However, jurisdiction is still
required at the intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and Hawthorne
Boulevard for a current U.T.C. project and at the intersections of
Rosecrans Avenue wi-th Atlantic Avenue and Bellflower Boulevard for
.traffic signal timing adjustments, as well as retention of jurisdiction
for ongoing maintenance of the South Bay Computerized Traffic Signal
Control System. Therefore, the attached Resolution relinquishes
jurisdiction along Rosecrans Avenue except as noted above, relinquishes
jurisdiction at the intersection of Crenshaw Boulevard and Rosecrans
Avenue and rescinds the portion of the Resolution of January 30, 1973
declaring the portion of Rosecrans Avenue within the City of Norwalk to
be a part of the County System of Highways.
Upon the adoption of this Resolution, please transmit one certified
copy to the City Clerks of the Cities of Bellflower, Compton, Downey,
El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, La Mirada, Lawndale, Los Angeles,
Manhattan Beach, Norwalk, Paramount, and Santa Fe Springs.
Respectfully submitted,.
b
T. A. TIDEMANSON
Road Commissioner
BA:sml/16A
Attach.
1
2
3
4
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
PA,.]
City of El Segundo
RESOLUTION DECLARING PORTIONS OF
ROSECRANS AVENUE
IN THE CITIES OF BELLFLOWER, COMPTON, DOWNEY, EL SEGUNDO,
GARDENA, HAWTHORNE, LA MIRADA, LAWNDALE, LOS ANGELES,
MANHATTAN BEACH, PARAMOUNT AND SANTA FE SPRINGS
AND CRENSHAW BOULEVARD
IN THE CITIES OF GARDENA AND HAWTHORNE
NO LONGER TO BE A PART OF THE COUNTY SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS
AND RESCINDING FORMER ACTION DECLARING THE PORTION OF
ROSECRANS AVENUE IN THE CITY OF NORWALK
TO BE A PART OF THE COUNTY SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS
WHEREAS, by Resolutions heretofore adopted, those portions of
Rosecrans Avenue between Highland Avenue and Beach Boulevard within
the Cities of Bellflower, Compton, Downey, E1 Segundo, Gardena,
Hawthorne, La Mirada, Lawndale, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach,
Norwalk, Paramount and Santa Fe Springs and Crenshaw Boulevard
at Rosecrans Avenue within the Cities of Gardena and Hawthorne,
County of Los Angeles, State of California, have been declared by
the Board of Supervisors of said County to be a part of the County
System of Highways pursuant to the provisions of Sections 1700 to
1704 inclusive of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California for certain purposes; and
WHEREAS, the above mentioned Cities, with the exception of
the City of Norwalk, subsequently consented to the County taking
jurisdiction as required by Section 1701 of the aforementioned
Code; and
190
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, that portion of the proposed project on Rosecrans
Avenue within the City of Norwalk was subsequently deleted and,
therefore, Norwalk'-s consent to jurisdiction was no longer
required; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution heretofore adopted, a portion of
Rosecrans Avenue within the City of Manhattan Beach for which
jurisdiction had previously been acquired was declared no longer
to be a part of the County System of Highways; and
WHEREAS, with the exceptions as noted below, those purposes
for which jurisdiction was granted have now been accomplished
and it is no longer necessary to retain jurisdiction over all
portions of the herein described highways;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors
of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, that those
portions of Rosecrans Avenue between Highland Avenue and Beach
Boulevard and intersecting streets appurtenant to the construction_
thereof within the Cities of Bellflower, Compton, Downey,
E1 Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, La Mirada, Lawndale, Los Angeles,
Manhattan Beach, Paramount and Santa Fe Springs are hereby declared
not to be a part of the County System of Highways of said County,
except for the intersection of Rosecrans Avenue and Hawthorne
Boulevard within the City of Hawthorne for the signal modification
project now under construction and the intersections of Rosecrans
Avenue and Atlantic Avenue within the City of Compton and Rosecrans
Avenue and Bellflower Boulevard within the City of Bellflower for
traffic signal timing adjustments.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Los Angeles, State of California, that Crenshaw Boulevard
-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
W
between 100 feet north of Rosecrans Avenue and 100 feet south
of Rosecrans Avenue within the Cities of Gardena and Hawthorne
are hereby declared not to be a part of the County System of
Highways of said County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Resolution of March 30, 1971
Synopsis No. 106, which declared various streets in the Cities of
E1 Segundo, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach,'Lawndale, Manhattan Beach,
Redondo Beach and Torrance in the South Bay area, including a
portion of Rosecrans Avenue, to be a part of the County System of
Highways for the purpose of maintaining a computerized traffic
signal control system shall remain in full force and effect until
otherwise declared.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Los Angeles, State of California, that the portion of
the Resolution of January 30, 1973, Synopsis No. 90, declaring that
portion of Rosecrans Avenue within the City of Norwalk to be a part
of the County System of Highways is hereby rescinded.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution will be effective
ten days after filing with the City Clerks of the Cities of Bellflower,
Compton, Downey, El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, La Mirada, Lawndale,
Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, Paramount and Santa Fe Springs.
1
2
3
4
67
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
t&l
04-11
I,I STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
VCounty of Los Angeles ) s.s.
I, JAMES S. MIZE, Executive Officer -Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, do hereby certify
that the attached is a full, true and correct copy of a
Resolution adopted on -TA Q,Mk 10 1 ja$I
by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, and
ex officio the governing body of all other special assessment and
taxing districts for which said Board so acts.
N� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I
LOB have hereunto set my
hand and affixed my seal of the County of
Los Angeles thisday of ,19
# ,+
JAMES S. MIZE, Executive Officer -Clerk of
hawthe Board of Supervisors of the County of
Los Angeles.
B
y-_.- 15eputy.._.._.-.�...�...��..�-.�.-_.-