Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CONTRACT 6214 Professional Services Agreement
Agreement No. 6214 Agreement No. [City Clerk assigns]_ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT `BETWEEN m THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND BUREAU VERITAS TECHNICAL ASSESSMENTS LLC This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 17th day of November, 2021, by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation and general law city ("CITY") and BUREAU VERITAS TECHNICAL ASSESSMENTS LLC., a limited liability company ("CONSULTANT"). The parties agree as follows: 1. CONSIDERATION. A, As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, below; B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement; C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a sum not to exceed ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND dollars ($150,000) for CONSULTANT's services. CITY may modify this amount as set forth below. Unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement, CITY will pay this sum as specified in the attached Exhibit "A," which is incorporated by reference. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES, A. CONSULTANT will perform services listed in the attached Exhibit "A," which is incorporated by reference. B. CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space and facilities, and all tests, testing and analyses, calculation, and all other means whatsoever, except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement. 3. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. While performing this Agreement, CONSULTANT will use the appropriate generally accepted professional standards of practice existing at the time of performance utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services. CITY will continuously monitor CONSULTANT's services. CITY will notify CONSULTANT of any deficiencies and CONSULTANT will have fifteen (15) days after such notification to City of El Segundo Professional Services (REV 2018.05) Page 1 of 11 Agreement No. 6214 Agreement No. [City Clerk assigns]_ cure any shortcomings to CITY's satisfaction. Costs associated with curing the deficiencies will be borne by CONSULTANT. 4. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit a detailed invoice to CITY which lists the hours worked and hourly rates for each personnel category and reimbursable costs (all as set forth in Exhibit "A") the tasks performed, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period, the cumulative percentage completed for each task, the total cost of that work during the preceding billing month and a cumulative cash flow curve showing projected and actual expenditures versus time to date. 5. NON -APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments due and payable to CONSULTANT for current services are within the current budget and within an available, unexhausted and unencumbered appropriation of the CITY. In the event the CITY has not appropriated sufficient funds for payment of CONSULTANT services beyond the current fiscal year, this Agreement will cover only those costs incurred up to the conclusion of the current fiscal year. 6. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. A. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT agrees that it has: Carefully investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; Carefully considered how the services should be performed; and iii. Understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. B. If services involve work upon any site, CONSULTANT agrees that CONSULTANT has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, before commencing the services hereunder. Should CONSULTANT discover any latent or unknown conditions that may materially affect the performance of the services, CONSULTANT will immediately inform CITY of such fact and will not proceed except at CONSULTANT's own risk until written instructions are received from CITY. 7. TERM. The term of this Agreement will be from November 22, 2021, to June 30, 2022. Unless otherwise determined by written amendment between the parties, this Agreement will terminate in the following instances: A. Completion of the work specified in Exhibit "A", City of El Segundo Professional Services (REV 2018.05) Page 2 of 11 Agreement No. 6214 Agreement No. [City Clerk assigns]_ B. Termination as stated in Section 15. 8. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. A. CONSULTANT will not perform any work under this Agreement until:. CONSULTANT furnishes proof of insurance as required under Section 22 of this Agreement; and ii. CITY gives CONSULTANT a written notice to proceed. B. Should CONSULTANT begin work on any phase in advance of receiving written authorization to proceed, any such professional services are at CONSULTANT's own risk. 9. TIME EXTENSIONS. Should CONSULTANT be delayed by causes beyond CONSULTANT's control, CITY may grant a time extension for the completion of the contracted services. If delay occurs, CONSULTANT must notify the Manager within forty-eight (48) hours, in writing, of the cause and the extent of the delay and how such delay interferes with the Agreement's schedule. The Manager will extend the completion time, when appropriate, for the completion of the contracted services. 10. CONSISTENCY. In interpreting this Agreement and resolving any ambiguities, the main body of this Agreement takes precedence over the attached Exhibits; this Agreement supersedes any conflicting provisions. Any inconsistency between the Exhibits will be resolved in the order in which the Exhibits appear below: A. Exhibit: A: Budget, Proposal for Services, and Scope of Work. 11. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties. 12.TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 13. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT, at its sole expense, will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. 14. WAIVER. CITY's review or acceptance of, or payment for, work product prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement will not be construed to operate as a waiver of City of El Segundo Professional Services (REV 2018.05) Page 3 of 11 Agreement No. 6214 Agreement No. [City Clerk assigns]_ any rights CITY may have under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising from CONSULTANT's performance. A waiver by CITY of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement will not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement, whether of the same or different character. 15. TERMINATION. A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. B. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement at any time with CITY's mutual consent. Notice will be in writing at least thirty (30) days before the effective termination date. C. Upon receiving a termination notice, CONSULTANT will immediately cease performance under this Agreement unless otherwise provided in the termination notice. Except as otherwise provided in the termination notice, any additional work performed by CONSULTANT after receiving a termination notice will be performed at CONSULTANT's own cost; CITY will not be obligated to compensate CONSULTANT for such work. D. Should termination occur, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT will, at CITY's option, become CITY's property, and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination, not to exceed the total costs under Section 1(C). Ea Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated. F. By executing this document, CONSULTANT waives any and all claims for damages that might otherwise arise from CITY's termination under this Section. 16.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement are CITY's property. CONSULTANT may retain copies of said documents and materials as desired but will deliver all original materials to CITY upon CITY's written notice. CITY agrees that use of CONSULTANT's completed work product, for purposes other than identified in this Agreement, or use of incomplete work product, is at CITY's own risk. 17. PUBLICATION OF DOCUMENTS. Except as necessary for performance of service under this Agreement, no copies, sketches, or graphs of materials, including graphic art City of El Segundo Professional Services (REV 2018.05) Page 4 of 11 Agreement No. 6214 Agreement No. [City Clerk assigns]_ work, prepared pursuant to this Agreement, will be released by CONSULTANT to any other person or public CITY without CITY's prior written approval. All press releases, including graphic display information to be published in newspapers or magazines, will be approved and distributed solely by CITY, unless otherwise provided by written agreement between the parties. 18.INDEMNIFICATION. A. CONSULTANT agrees to the following: I. Indemnification for Professional Services. CONSULTANT will save harmless and indemnify and at CITY's request reimburse defense costs for CITY and all its officers, volunteers, employees and representatives from and against any and all suits, actions, or claims, of any character whatever, brought for, or on account of, any injuries or damages sustained by any person or property resulting or arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission by CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT's officers, agents, employees, or representatives, in the performance of this Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful misconduct. ii. Indemnification for other Damages. CONSULTANT indemnifies and holds CITY harmless from and against any claim, action, damages, costs (including, without limitation, attorney's fees), injuries, or liability, arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, except for such loss or damage arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful misconduct. Should CITY be named in any suit, or should any claim be brought against it by suit or otherwise, whether the same be groundless or not, arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, CONSULTANT will defend CITY (at CITY's request and with counsel satisfactory to CITY) and will indemnify CITY for any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise. B. For purposes of this section "CITY" includes CITY's officers, officials, employees, agents, representatives, and certified volunteers. C. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions will survive termination of this Agreement. D. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONSULTANT as required by Section 22, and any City of El Segundo Professional Services (REV 2018.05) Page 5 of 11 Agreement No. 6214 Agreement No. [City Clerk assigns]_ approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification. 19.ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT's professional services. CONSULTANT's attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY's written approval are prohibited and will be null and void. 20.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which it is performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus, or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only. 21.AUDIT OF RECORDS. CONSULTANT will maintain full and accurate records with respect to all services and matters covered under this Agreement. CITY will have free access at all reasonable times to such records, and the right to examine and audit the same and to make transcript therefrom, and to inspect all program data, documents, proceedings and activities. CONSULTANT will retain such financial and program service records for at least three (3) years after termination or final payment under this Agreement. 22. INSURANCE. A. Before commencing performance under this Agreement, and at all other times this Agreement is effective, CONSULTANT will procure and maintain the following types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum, with the limits set forth below: Type of Insurance Commercial general liability Professional Liability Business automobile liability Workers compensation City of El Segundo Professional Services (REV 2018.05) Page 6 of 11 Limits $2, 000, 000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Statutory requirement Agreement No. 6214 Agreement No. [City Clerk assigns]_ B. Commercial general liability insurance will meet or exceed the requirements of the most recent ISO-CGL Form. The amount of insurance set forth above will be a combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage for the policy coverage. Liability policies will be endorsed to name CITY, its officials, and employees as "additional insureds" under said insurance coverage and to state that such insurance will be deemed "primary" such that any other insurance that may be carried by CITY will be excess thereto. Such endorsement must be reflected on ISO Form No. CG 20 10 11 85 or 88, or equivalent. Such insurance will be on an "occurrence," not a "claims made," basis and will not be cancelable or subject to reduction except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY. C, Professional liability coverage will be on an "occurrence basis" if such coverage is available, or on a "claims made" basis if not available. When coverage is provided on a "claims made basis," CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect. D, Automobile coverage will be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01 06 92, including symbol 1 (Any Auto). E. CONSULTANT will furnish to CITY duly authenticated Certificates of Insurance evidencing maintenance of the insurance required under this Agreement and such other evidence of insurance or copies of policies as may be reasonably required by CITY from time to time. Insurance must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best Company Rating equivalent to at least a Rating of "A:VII." F. Should CONSULTANT, for any reason, fail to obtain and maintain the insurance required by this Agreement, CITY may obtain such coverage at CONSULTANT's expense and deduct the cost of such insurance from payments due to CONSULTANT under this Agreement or terminate pursuant to Section 15. 23. USE OF SUBCONTRACTORS. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY's prior written approval to use any consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must approve of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation. 24.INCIDENTAL TASKS. CONSULTANT will meet with CITY monthly to provide the status on the project, which will include a schedule update and a short narrative City of El Segundo Professional Services (REV 2018.05) Page 7 of 11 Agreement No. 6214 Agreement No. [City Clerk assigns]_ description of progress during the past month for each major task, a description of the work remaining and a description of the work to be done before the next schedule update. 25. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows: If to CONSULTANT: Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC 220 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92618 Attn: Erik Piller, Senior Vice President Phone: 800-733-0660 Email: erik.piller@bureauveritas.com If to CITY - City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA Attention: Lifan Xu, City Engineer Phone: 310-524-2368 Email. Ixu@elsegundo.org Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. 26. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONSULTANT will comply with all conflict of interest laws and regulations including, without limitation, CITY's conflict of interest regulations. 27. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability. 28.THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT's or CITY's obligations under this Agreement. 29.INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County. City of El Segundo Professional Services (REV 2018.05) Page 8 of 11 Agreement No. 6214 Agreement No. [City Clerk assigns]_ 30. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. CONSULTANT agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws applicable to this Agreement. 31. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Exhibit(s), sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. This Agreement will bind and inure to the benefit of the parties to this Agreement and any subsequent successors and assigns. 32. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party. 33. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and, as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect. 34.AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment. 35.ACCEPTANCE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Agreement, agreements ancillary to this Agreement, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by electronic (pdf) or facsimile transmission. Such electronic or facsimile signature will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. 36. CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and will not affect the interpretation of this Agreement. 37. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 38. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be prevented due to fire, flood, explosion, acts of terrorism, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties' reasonable control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other. City of El Segundo Professional Services (REV 2018.05) Page 9 of 11 Agreement No. 6214 Agreement No. [City Clerk assigns]_ 39. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public CITY. [Signatures on next page] City of El Segundo Professional Services (REV 2018.05) Page 10 of 11 Agreement No. 6214 Agreement No. [City Clerk assigns]_ IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written. Cir 2t EL SEGUNDO BAS JEE , Vi ° TA ZNKTir LC CHNICAL . 14 k'Mitnick, ity Manager ATTEST: Trac W v City lerk APPR VED AS TO FORM' JI 044 Mar D. Hensley,o City ttorney Insurance Approval Hank Lu, Risk Manager Erik Piller, Senior Vice Nesident City of El Segundo Professional Services (REV 2018.05) Page 11 of 11 EXHIBIT A Agreement No. 6214 The following fees include all costs associated with travel, lodging, car rental, food, tools, equipment, and all other miscellaneous expenses applicable to the work related to this project. ............. ................ _... _ BUREAU VERITAS FEE BREAKDOWN LUMP SUM TOTAL $ 150,000.00� PROGRAM MANAGEMENTm ............... _............... $ 4,780.00 ADA SURVEY - TITLE II $ 21 22600 FACILITIES (17) $ 5,053.50 PARKS (19) $ 11,432.50 PARKING LOTS (16) $ 4,740.00 PUBLIC OUTREACH MEETING 1 PLUS COUNCIL MEETING _. $ww 3,080.00 COMPREHENSIVE TRANSITION PLAN / REPORTING _ _ $ 49,130.00 FACILITIES REPORTS $ 10,620.00 PARK REPORTS $ 20,700.00 PARKING LOTS $ 5,070.00 TRANSITION REPORT $ 12,740.00 PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY SURVEY / REPORTING _ �..... $ mmmmmm-57,444.00 PROGRAM AND POLICY REVIEW (Up to 60 Hours _ w __. m_ $9,480 00 GIS INTEGRATION ESRI $ 4,860.00 OPTIONS ALTERNATE / ADDITIONAL COST CAD DIAGRAMS ADDITIONAL OUTREACH MTG YEAR 1 - UPDATE TRANSITION PLAN $ YEAR 2 - UPDATE TRANSITION PLAN $ VISIT NEW SITES - MIN 3300/BLDG (depends on SF) 6,440.00 4,440.00 2,000.00 17„500.00 10,000.00 7,500.00 TBD BV will submit a monthly invoice inclusive of all services performed during that period The per site fee will be established per the schedule of values provided at the program kick-off, and invoiced at the billing milestones stated below. Invoices will be payable within 30 days of receipt: Completion of onsite assessments: 50% of per site fee Delivery of Draft Reports: 45% of per site fee Delivery of Final Reports: 5%of per site fee Upon receipt of each monthly invoice, the amount due per billing milestone is fully collectible, Please forward payments to: Accounting Department, Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC, PO Box 74007289, Chicago, IL 60674-7289 or contact BV-invoicing@BVNA com to pay via credit card or to receive wiring instructions. Please ensure that BV Proposal 4150140,21P or invoice number is clearly identified on all payments and correspondence for proper credit City of El Segundo Revision Q Page 1 of 1 Cost Proposal Form Agreement No. 6214 August 26, 2021 III°°INICAll 11P 1IR 0 P 0 SA I IIl Fl F) E N G 2 1, �13 Agreement No. 6214 RE RFP Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan RFP NO. ENG 21-13 22 Dear Ms. Rivera, Thank you for taking the time to review Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC's (Bureau Veritas or BVTA) qualifications in response to the City of EI Segundo's RFP forAmericans with Disability Act Self -Evaluation & Transition Plan. The following proposal details our capability to execute this project. Pirovein 11:Hxper`ience I Bureau Veritas has extensive experience providing ADA Assessments for City, County and State Government entities. We are licensed in the State of California and are familiar with all ADA and California codes and regulations. BVTA is very familiar with the City of El Segundo; we completed Facility Condition Assessments and ADA Title II surveys for the city. In addition to ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan expertise - Bureau Veritas offers a full suite of services including ADA plan check, inspections, ADA design (Owen Group, a BV Company), and turn -key project management for implementation. BVTA's code compliance group has performed ADA and CASp plan check and inspections for hundreds of municipalities acting as augmented staff or third party consultants.. l-fighly QualifiedTea rin I Bureau Veritas is an architecture and engineering firm focused solely on assessment and planning studies, with 700 professionals nationwide. We provide a national broad based Project Team of Accessibility Assessors with backgrounds in Architecture, Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, and Construction. ADA, Ex1perieince N Bureau Veritas has performed similar ADA consulting for clients including: • City of El Segundo City of Orange, CA • City of Seal Beach City of Chino, CA • City of Commerce City of Pomona, CA • City of Culver City City of Temecula, CA • City of South Gate City of Huntington Park, CA • City of Huntington Park City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA • City of La Mirada South Orange County Community College District, CA • City of Chino City of Industry CA • City of Irwindale City of Tracy, CA • County of Humboldt City of Garden Grove, CA • San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) Hayward Recreation and Parks, CA • Los Angeles USD City of Napa, CA • Judicial Council of California Ambrose Parks and Recreation District, CA • City of Brea, CA Gavilan College, CA It Agreement No. 6214 The proposed Project Manager, Mark Surdam, RA, is available and fully committed to this effort for the entire duration of service delivery. This proposal is valid for a period of ninety (90) calendar days from the date of receipt thereof by the City. Our signed Addendum Acknowledgment is included on the following pages. We appreciate the opportunity to present our qualifications for these services and look forward to working with the City of El Segundo. I am authorized to bind Bureau Veritas to all terms, conditions, and commitments made in this proposal. Please contact me at 800.733.0660, ext. 2704 or erik.piller@bureauveritas.com to further discuss our qualifications. Sincerely, Erik Pilfer, Senior Vice President fifl Agreement No. 6214 CITYGY ELSGUNDO August 17, 2021 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NO. ENG 21-13 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN ATTENTION RFP HOLDERS: The following additions, modifications, and clarifications to the specifications shall be included in, and become a part of, any contract which may be executed for the above project in the City of El Segundo: 1. The proposal due date and time is still Tuesday, August 31, at 4:00 pm 2. A list of the participants at the pre -proposal meeting is attached. 3. Please see the attached Supplement to Addendum 1 for questions and the responses to them. As evidence that the CONSULTANT has read this Addendum, the CONSULTANT must acknowledge same in the space provided below and submit this Addendum with the Proposal. Failure to provide such acknowledgement shall render the proposal as non- responsive and subject to rejection. . 8/19/2021 Signature: ....:::: m mmmIT_ Date. Print Company Name: Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC Page 1 of 1 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA 90245-3895 (310) 524-2300 Fax (310) 640-0489 Agreement No. 6214 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION RFP NO. ENG 21-13 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN PRE -PROPOSAL ZOOM MEETING PARTICIPANTS August 11, 2021. 10:00 AM NAME COMPANY CONTACT INFORMATION 1 Floriza Rivera City of El Segundo Telephone: 310-524-2361 Email: frivera@elsegundo.org 2 Jenny Grover Disability Access Consultants LLC 3 Brandon Guyton Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. 4 Bryon Scott Bureau Veritas 5 Jasper Kirsch Jensen Hughes 6 Kelly Hang Jensen Hughes .. ...... 7 ..... Steve Kuchinsky _..... Onyx Architects 8 Brenda Nasio Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. 9 Mary Epstein Bureau Veritas 10 John Cruikshank JMCZ Agreement No. 6214 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NO. ENG 21-13 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN ADDENDUM NO. 1 SUPPLEMENT DATE: August 17, 2021 TO: All Prospective Proposers The following clarifying information and answers to questions have been provided below. The information provided in this Addendum has been made available to all prospective proposers and shall be considered as incorporated into the specifications for the above -referenced project. All other portions of Contract Documents and previous Addenda not specifically mentioned in this Addendum remain in force. Question 1: Is the $150,000 the full amount of funding for all phases of the ADA Self - Evaluation and Transition Plan? Answer: The funding will primarily be for: 1. Surveying City public right-of-way and open areas for accessibility barriers 2. Reviewing existing accessibility data 3. Generating an ADA transition plan that combines all City accessibility data and determines a long-term schedule and cost estimates for the removal of accessibility barriers in City buildings, right-of-way, and open space in future years. Question 2: The Request for Proposal mentioned addressing items that weren't previously addressed. Have there been any changes in the way the City of El Segundo approaches ADA compliance? Answer: The City requirements do not differ from those already set by current ADA standards. An existing structure that may not have a Facility Condition Form applicable to it would be an example of an item that would need to be addressed (surveyed) at this time. The scope of work provides for that addition so that the final ADA transition plan will be complete in its information on City structures. Agreement No. 6214 Question 3: Due to Covid-19 restrictions, will the City of El Segundo consider an electronic submission only via email of the "...proposal and the fee proposal... " rather than "an electronic copy via digital media, an original and three (3) hardcopies of [the] proposal and the fee proposal in a separate sealed envelope" Answer: The City will accept an electronic submission of the proposal and fee proposal via email to ensure that the proposal is received by the deadline. Please place RFP ENG 21-13 in the subject line of the proposal email. Please place FEE PROPOSAL RFP ENG 21-13 in the subject line of the separate fee proposal email. However, three hardcopies of the proposal and a hardcopy of the fee proposal in a separate sealed envelope will still also be expected to arrive at City Hall within the same week. Please send or deliver the hardcopies to: F. Rivera Public Works Department El Segundo City Hall 350 Main St. El Segundo, CA 90245 310-524-2361 Question 4: How many curb ramps, pedestrian signals, and intersections are there to be surveyed? Answer: Curb ramps — approximately 972 potential and existing curb ramp locations. Pedestrian signals — approximately 23 signalized intersections. The City also has 7 public lighted crosswalks and 1 private lighted crosswalk (no traffic signal) . Intersections — approximately 173 intersections. Question 5: How many miles of sidewalk are there to survey? Answer: The City has approximately 61.8 miles of streets. If sidewalks are present on both sides of the street, then there are approximately 124 miles of sidewalk to survey. Question 6: We are requesting the GIS Street Centerline Shapefiles as a "downloadable file" Answer: Facility Condition Assessments and GIS Street Centerline Shapefiles will be sent to any requestor. Agreement No. 6214 Question 7: During the August 11, 2021 Zoom conference pre -submittal meeting, we understand that the City of El Segundo has "a budget of $150,000 for this year" Is the $150,000 the full amount of funding for all phases of the ADA Self - Evaluation and Transition Plan? Or, is the $150,000 the initial funding of the project? And, if so, what is the focus of this initial scope of work that the $150,000 will fund?" Answer: The $150,000 funding will primarily be for: 1. Surveying City public right-of-way and open areas for accessibility barriers 2. Reviewing existing accessibility data 3. Generating an ADA transition plan that combines all City accessibility data and determines a long-term schedule and cost estimates for the removal of accessibility barriers in City buildings, right-of-way, and open space in future years. Agreement No. 6214 1. Cover Letter 2. Table of Contents 3. Executive Summary......................................................................................................................... 1 4. Firm Qualifications ... .... — .... ,,, ......., ........... . . ........ ................ ... 3 5. Staff Qualifications,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,..,, ............ .. ...._..........,... ,.,. ,.,,..,.,.,........ 7 6. CASp Certification............................................................................................................................. 7 7. Issues and Challenges..................................................................................................................... 8 8. Understanding and Approach,—.—. .... ....... ..... ....... . ..... ............ 9 9. Estimated Labor Hours.................................................................................................................... 22 10. Cost Proposal (under separate cover) 105 Agreement No. 6214 .� r /r,., r r r / .l r BV understandsprovide • • services to ensure that the City of • •aspects to its facilities, parks, sidewalks and curb ramps. The scope of work, as defined by the City, includes: • ADA Self Evaluation - Physical Assessment of Sidewalks, Curb Ramps, Crosswalks, Parking, Parks, and Buildings - Accessibility Transition Plan - Program Access and Policy Review - Public Outreach Meetings (2) BV will complete the following: • Conduct comprehensive accessibility assessmentand inventory of sidewalks (-404 miles), curb ramps (-3,000), and 100 sinalized crosswalks identified by the City. • Ensure compliance with applicable standards, regulations, and codes for accessibility • Perform site visits to observe, document, and photograph specific conditions and modifications of facilities and components subjectto federal, state, and local access requirements. • Assessmentofthe contentand location ofthe Client programs, services, policies, training and communication practices. • Create publicoutreach to ensure public input into the transition planning process, including public meetings and public survey. • Create criteria to prioritize facilities and/or categories of work to support a phased approach to implementation of the ADA Transition Plan. • Establish order of magnitude (pre -planning level) estimated costs for each barrier removal necessary to make facilities accessible. • Prepare interim and final presentations of findings and recommendations to the City. • Deliver draft and final reports per protocol established by the City. • Maintain the electronic database the City can use to track barrier removals as each is completed, which serves as a living Transition Plan. Agreement No. 6214 i// r yr /,//ii u � /i �/ i//�// 1 /// l /L � ✓ 1 /, , i / iJ,i f /// / / / ✓ / //% f // ��1//%//OG/.a✓Li�///./�//,,,,///.. ///r/, ._./�.. �irr,lrrGc ll f/( rlr%/j%irr�lr�//, , ,... / Founded in 1986, Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC (Bureau Veritas) is a professional service consulting firm providing comprehensive architectural, engineering, energy, and environmental solutions. Our team includes over 700 building professionals nationwide, including Certified ADA Specialists, Registered Architects, Professional Engineers, Certified Energy Managers, Environmental Professionals, Building Systems Consultants, and Code Compliance Experts. Annually, Bureau Veritas conductsthousandsofassessments for Private, Industrial, Government, K-12 Education, and Higher Education Clients. Having successfully completed assessments of several million square feet of building space, Bureau Veritas has developed a proven and efficient methodology for the performance offield assessments, and data collection. ADA Accessibility Compliance Facility Condition Assessments M Space Analysis Capital Needs Assessments Energy Studies Capital Planning Feasibility Studies y Project Management Construction Monitoring Plan and Document Review Inventory, Barcoding and Tagging Capital Planning Software Preventive Maintenance Name of Company: Headquarters Address: Project Office: Primary Contact: Telephone: Email: Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Owings Mills, MD 21117 220 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92618 Eirik Mier Sr. Vice President (6) 7,,, 0660, ex,t. 2704 IEuridIlk. Il13iilie ur@ bu rea a verita s.co urns BV Office Locations ,. QBVTechnicalAssessments Headquarters Agreement No. 6214 BOCA (Certified Inspectors on staff) Projects completed by BV similar in scope to the City's project are as follows M111= CA ADA Transition Plan � n Ongoing City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Tracy CA ADA Transition Plan Ongoing San Bernardino County Transportation Authority City of Industry CA CA PROW ADA Study ADA PROW Assessment Ongoing Ongoing City of Humboldt CA CASp Study 2021 Judicial Courts of California CA CASp Study 2021 State of Washington Parks & Recreation WA ADA Transition Plan 2021 City of Napa City ofTemecu[a CA CA ADAAssessment FCA with Inventory 2021 2021 City of Pomona City of Seal Beach CA CA ADA Transition Plan ADA Transition Plan 2020 2020 City of Redmond WA ADAAssessment 2020 City of Lexington State of Hawaii NC HI ADAAssessment ADA Study 2020 2019 University of Nevada, Reno NV ADAAssessment 2019 Hayward Recreation and Park District CA ADAAssessment 2019 City of El Segundo City of Garden Grove CA CA FCA and ADA Assessment FCA and ADA Assessment 2019 2019 City of Brea CA FCA and ADA Assessment 2019 Town of Acton Town of Revere City of Rockville MA MA MD ADAAssessment ADAAssessment ADAAssessment 2018 2018 2018 New Hanover County Kimco NC Nationwide FCA and ADAAssessment FCA and ADAAssessment 2018 2018 City of Wilmington DE ADAAssessment 2018 Metro Parks of the Toledo Area Arlington County City of Orange City of Monterey OH VA CA CA FCA and ADA Assessment ADAAssessment FCA and ADA Assessment CASp Study 2017 2017 2016 2016 Ambrose Parks and Recreation District CA ADAAssessment 2016 3 IP& Ilfii..: C I PROF11,,,,, CITY OF GARDEN GROVE FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND ADA SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN The City awarded Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC (BVTA)' with a contract for ADA Evaluation and Transition Plan services and an additional option for Facility Condition Assessments to be concurrently conducted. Our consulting services were to help the City of Garden Grove complywith all aspects of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the State of California, and local accessibility regulations with regards to its public buildings. Our assessments culminated in the production of an ADA Transition Plan, which included a schedule of improvements necessary to meet the ADA requirements, associated order of magnitude cost estimates for barrier removal, a prioritized list of improvements, and a timeline for completion of needed improvements or modifications. We were also awarded additional services to perform ADA Surveys of PROW within +/- 1,200 feet of 35 city -owned sites to meet the requirements of Section 9.3 of the Local Assistance Procedure Manual as published by the California Department of Transportation. This included the recording of sidewalk slope and cross -slope data, path of travel barriers, and curb ramp compliance. BVTA was additionally asked to provide Facility Condition Assessment services which included a life cycle analysis, inventory of assets, and a capital plan with recommendations for repair and replacements over the next 20 years. The assessment included looking at essential facilities, recreational sites, water division assets, and other community structures. BVTA's assessors looked at all major building systems including building envelope, infrastructure, MEP, and interiors. KEY PERSONNEL Erik Piller- Project Executive Mark Surdam - Program Manager Bryon Scott - Report Reviewer Tracy Trisko - Field Team Lead Jennifer Etten -Assessor Susan Lloyd -Assessor Agreement No. 6214 Garden Grove, CA Facility Condition Assessment ADA Transition Plan 42 Facilities 304,389 SF City Hall Theaters Libraries Fire & Police Stations Park Facilities and Golf Course Community Center 2019-2020 Phillip Carter 13802 Newhope Street Garden Grove, CA 92843 (714) 741-5380 philc@garden-grove.org 'BVTA was formerly known as EMG. 4 113I11ROJEC"'lIr ll) R 0 F II 1,,,,, II DIY OF EL SEGUNDO FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND ADA TRANSITION Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC (BVTA) was awarded a contract for citywide Facilities Condition Assessment {FCA) and ADA Transition Plan in order to provide the City with guidance on how to best operate, maintain, and upgrade the facilities in the short- and long-term. Our facility assessment services include life cycle analysis, equipment/ asset inventory, barcoding, and preventive maintenance plans. The data collected will be migrated to the City's CMMS platform and used to formulate a capital plan. BVTA conducted site evaluations and documented the condition of existing facilities, perform non-destructive investigations of building, structural, architectural, ADA access, fire/life safety, MEP, energy, environmental, and roofing systems. We provided cost estimates to replace or replace building systems and generate a Facilities Condition Index (FCI) benchmark for each building. The City required an ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan for all facilities. BVTA inspected the sites and provided a list of prioritized barrier improvements with an order of magnitude cost estimates. Part of our deliverable was a "live" transition plan utilizing our ADA AssetCALC database platform. KEY PERSONNEL Erik Pilfer- Project Executive Mark Surdam - Program Manager Tracy Trisko - Report Reviewer Jennifer Etten - Assessor Susan Lloyd -Assessor 'BVTA was formerly known as EMG.. Agreement No. 6214 EL Segundo, CA Facility Condition Assessment ADA Transition Plan 31 Facilities 262,367 SF Pa rks City Hall Senior Center Community Center Maintenance Facility Water Division Fire & Police Stations 2018-2021 V IP IIll III;: C T II13 I111 I11::::1 III,,,,, E HAYWARD AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT, ADA TRANSITION PLAN, AND ENERGY AUDIT Bureau Veritas Tech n ica I Assessments LLC (BVTA)' was awarded a contract forth Hayward Area Recreation and Park District. Services included a comprehensive `acility condition assessment, energy audits; and an ADA transition plan, The district required a comprehensive building evaluation including architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing and code compliance evaluations. The scope included corrective recommendations, budget estimates for the corrective work, and an estimated schedule for the completion of all recommended corrective work at the District owned facilities. Our scope included providing preventive maintenance recommendations for major systems. We also conducted an energy audit at each facility utilizing ASHRAELevel 2 protocols. BVTA has also conducted an ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan which scope includes a schedule of improvements necessary to meet ADA requirements, associated order of magnitude cost estimates for barrier removal, a prioritized list of improvements, and a timeline for completion of needed improvements or modifications, hve used P,ssetCA'_C sott\vare `or data ccllection and cc:plral piannirg reporrs. acilities included an art center, nature center, community centers, administrative building, corp yard, theater, senior centers, swim centers, and recreation centers. KEY PERSONNEL Erik Piller- Project Executive Bryon Scott- Program Manager Tracy Trisko - Report Reviewer Brian Manternach -Assessor Susan Lloyd -Assessor "BVTA was formerly known as EMG. Agreement No. 6214 Hayward, CA Facility Condition Assessment ADA Transition Plan Energy Audit 88 Parks & Facilities 603 Acres 193,000 SF Parks Community Centers Senior centers Admin Buildings Corp Yard 2017-2019 Meghan Tiernan Hayward Area Recreation and Park District 1099 East Street Hay\,vard, CA 94541 (510) 881-6712 Tiem@hayvvardrec_org 6 Agreement No. 6214 Mark Surdam, RA I Program Manager Mr, Surdam will manage the Assessment Team and meet with the City on an agreed - upon basis to ensure project success. Mr. Surdam will be accountable for the overall BV Team performance and will be responsible for delivering the assessment results, and for working with the City to develop the implementation plan based on the results. He will have full responsibility for the delivery of the overall project. Bryon Scott, ADAC I Quality Assurance Manager Mr. Scott will provide general oversight of this project, assuring technical, process, and content quality, and provide quick and effective implementation of quality assurance measures both at inception and throughout the duration of the project. The Quality Assurance Manager conducts spot checks and random report reviews by selecting a sample of assets in each phase of the process, including the assessment / fieldwork stages, report preparations f Eirilc e stages, review stages, and data validation software stag CT es. Mr. Scott is EXECUTIVE responsible for technical review of deliverables. ie Assessment Team The Assessment Team will observe, measure, record, and describe the deficiencies observed through the process, interview staff, and formulate recommendations to remedy the deficiencies. They will coordinate the Mark Surdam, RA the assessment report. Our team will include multiple CASp certified staff that will conduct field assessments and/or peer review reports. Resumes are included on the following pages. A Our CASp Certified personnel resumes follow, under Section 6 - CASp Certifications. FIELD TEAM 7 Agreement No. 6214 Mr. Piller has 18 years of experience in client coordination of assessment, architectural -engineering, energy consulting, and construction phase services. He has been involved with projects of similar scope to the proposed project. As Project Executive, Mr. Pilfer is responsible for overseeing all contractual aspects of the project and will be available to meet with the client for the duration of the project on an as -needed basis. He will have primary responsibility for defining the scope of engagement, and will meet regularly with BV's Program Manager and Assessment Team to assure that the client's needs are being met, and that the project is adequately staffed, running smoothly, and on schedule. If 1IR J IEC T' I XIR Ii;:IRII IE Iq C E: City of El Segundo, CA ADA Assessment, Facility Condition Assessment City of Industry, CA ADA PROW Assessment City of Garden Grove, CA ADA Assessment, Facility Condition Assessment Hayward Area Park and Recreation District, CA ADA Transition Plan, Facility Condition Assessment, and Energy Audit City of Tracy, CA ADA Study and Transition Plan San Bernardino Transportation Authority (SBCTA), CA ADA PROW Assessment City of Orange, CA Facility Condition Assessment and ADA Transition Plan State of Washington Parks Commission, WA Statewide ADA Survey of 160 Parks Industry Experience Government K-12 Education Multi -Family Housing YEARS OF IEXP11::.I,M EN CIE: 18 Higher Education Retail Industrial Hospitality Office Agreement No. 6214 A QC MANAGER R Mr. Scott is a Lead Project Manager with BV. He has 21 years of Construction Management and is a Certified ADA Coordinator, and uses this knowledge to identify ADA barriers, minimize litigation risk, improve customer accessibility, and enhance customer satisfaction. Mr. Scott is a regular speaker at ADA Coordinator's meeting on Title II and Title III subjects. IPIROJE:°.C1 IEXII::1IERHE:INC : YEAII::Z II::::15 City of El Segundo, CA ADA Assessment, Facility Condition Assessment City of Industry, CA ADA PROW Assessment City of Tracy, CA ADA Study and Transition Plan City of Garden Grove, CA ADA Assessment, Facility Condition Assessment Hayward Area Recreation and Parks, CA ADA Transition Plan, FCA, & Energy Audit San Bernardino Transportation Authority (SBCTA), CA ADA PROW Assessment City of Brea, CA FCA and ADA Transition Plan of Facilities, Parks, and PROW of 175 Miles of Sidewalk University of Nevada, Reno, NV ADATransition Plan City of Lexington, NC ADA Assessments&Transition Plan Town of Acton, MA ADA Assessment and Transition Plan City of Wilmington, DE ADA Assessment and Transition Plan Education & Certifications Bachelor of Science, Business Administration, University of Maryland College Park, MD ADA Coordinator (ADAC) ADA Coordinator Training Certification Program (ACTCP), University of Missouri Agreement No. 6214 PROGRAM MANAGER Mr. Surdam is a registered architect with over 30 years of experience. He supervises teams of architects and engineers conducting Building Inspections, Property Condition, Assessments, Cost Estimating, and Government programs. He brings to Bureau Veritas a proven record of project management and the ability to provide clients with a wide array of services. PROJECT EXPERENCE: City of El Segundo, CA ADAAssessment, Facility Condition Assessment City of Garden Grove, CA ADA Assessment, Facility Condition Assessment City of Orange, CA ADA Transition Plan, Facility Condition Assessment City of Industry, CA ADA Transition Plan City of Napa, CA ADA Transition Plan, Facility Condition Assessment & Inventory City of Brea, CA ADA Assessment and PROW Study, Facility Condition Assessment University of Nevada - Reno, NV ADA Assessment, Facility Condition Assessment Education Bachelor of Architecture, Architecture University of Southern California YEARS F IEXII:::IEI EN IE:30+ Registration Registered Architect I CA 126835 Agreement No. 6214 II°:°III III,,,,, III,,,,,D rEAM II,,,,, III,,,,, III, Ms. Trisko is a Senior Project over 30 years of experience in and healthcare industries. She Transition Plan results, and IPFROJIECT IEXIPE��IIIENCIE; City of Tracy, CA ADA Study and Transition Plan Manager and the Accessibility Technical Lead at BV. She has the residential, K-12 education, higher education, government, is responsible for successful accessibility assessment and s the accessibility technical expert throughout the project. City of Brea, CA Facility Condition Assessment and ADA Assessment (175 miles of sidewalks, 19 facilities, and 10 parks) Hayward Area Recreation and Parks, CA ADA Transition Plan, FCA, & Energy Audit Rockdale County, GA ADAAssessment and Transition Plan; 42 buildings Arlington County Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources, VA FCA and ADA Assessment; 192 recreational facilities and parks Town of Acton, MA ADA Assessment and Transition Plan; 16 facilities City of Wilmington, DE ADA Assessment and Transition Plan; 45 facilities Maryland Nat'l Capital Park & Planning Commission, MD ADA Assessment and Transition Plan; 400+ parks Montgomery County School System, MD ADA Assessments; 3.5M SF Education MBA, Southern Illinois University Bachelor of Arts, Environmental Design/ Landscape Architecture, University of CA YEARS IF IEXIPIEIPIIIEINCIE 30+ Registration Registered Landscape Architect (RLA) Agreement No. 6214 IfIJE City of Tracy, CA ADA Study and Transition Plan San Bernardino Transportation Authority (SBCTA), CA ADA PROW Assessment City of Garden Grove, CA Facility Condition Assessment and ADATransition Plan City of Industry, CA ADA PROW Assessment YEARS 011== 11:::X PIf ::IIR11 ::::IN CI[:::: 11 Education Bachelor of Arts, Sociology, St. John University Certification Certified Access Specialist 1:'I1:Z0JE I EX I::-1EIR :::::N C E: Cotswolds Apartments, CA ADA Assessment Kimco Shopping Centers, CA ADA Assessment Hertz Corporation, CA ADA Survey Walgreens, CA ADA Assessment Spokane Regional Health District, WA ADA Assessment XIL:::AIf , 11= E IPII.::::RIIII: NCII.:::w 5 Education Certifications MS, Civil/Structural Engineering, California State University Certified Access Specialist I CA I CASp-845 BS, Civil Engineering, University of California PROJ1I::: City of Tracy, CA ADA Study and Transition Plan Hayward Area Recreation and Parks, CA ADA Transition Plan, Facility Condition Assessment, and Energy Audit City of Napa, CA ADATransition Plan, Facility Condition Assessment, Barcoding City of Redmond, WA ADA Assessment & Transition Plan Education Building Materials Management, Northeast Iowa Community College If 1If Z J IEC I City of Tracy, CA ADA Study and Transition Plan City of Lexington, NC ADA Assessment&Transition Plan City of Garden Grove, CA ADA Assessment Montgomery County Public Schools, MD ADA Assessment City of Wilmington, DE ADAAssessment Education Building Materials Management, Northeast Iowa Community College YIEAII:RS OF EXPIEII-IIIf®IN II®a 30+ Certifications Certified Access Specialist Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner XII::::: IfR F II::::: IPICIRUU:IIA I :30+ Certifications Certified Access Specialist Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner Agreement No. 6214 BV has experience with projects with identical scope to this engagement. We have learned that one of the most important parts of the project is a successful project Kick-off. If a project with an aggressive schedule such as this one gets underway without a good exchange of information, expectations and fine delineation of required final outputs and data elements, the project may fail. It is BVs standard approach on projects such as this to conduct a "pilot study." As part of this study, we meet with the Client, present our approach and perform a sample project. The results of this project and the database housing the results are presented to the Client. At this stage, we validate that all Client required reports and data sorting is possible, based on the field data collection protocol. If an item that the Client values is not captured in the field at this point in the assessment, these data elements can be added to our field data collection protocol. Another difficulty that can jeopardize the project involves adequate access to the buildings. We plan to use Microsoft Project as our scheduling and project management software for this project. We will present our project schedule at the project Kick-off and will update the schedule weekly. We find that by presenting a building -by -building schedule as early as possible in the project, the Client can respond and arrange access, and likewise, BV can work around any identified schedule conflicts Agreement No. 6214 BV has extensive experience and expertise with ADA Accessibility Standards, Public Rights -of -Way Accessibility Guidelines, and the California Building Code, which are relevant to this project. Our assessors and management staff have project experience in multiple states and locales nationwide, and apply the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design, the current ADA accessibility guidelines (ADAAG), and other state and local building codes as required by laws, statutes and ordinances. When prioritizing barrier removal, we will follow the order of preference advised by the Department of Justice in Title II requirements, or as modified through agreement with the City of El Segundo and by public survey results. BV is experienced with the application of the program access test defined in Title II 35.150(b), and understands that not all individual barriers must be removed, but the overall program must be made accessible. In the PROWAG sections regarding Discussion of Provisions and New Constructions, the Access Board discusses the importance of measuring sidewalk roughness for wheelchair usersafety. As a result, the Access Board funded research that members of our technology partner (pathVu) conducted to investigate the effects of pathway roughness on wheelchair user comfort and vibration exposure. Research showed that extended exposure to high levels of vibration can lead to neck and back pain in wheelchair users. Further, itshowed thatvibration exposure is directly correlated with pathway roughness. In 2016, pathVu (our PROW technology partner) published standard ASTM E3028-16: Standard Practice for Computing Wheelchair Roughness Index as Related to Comfort, Passability, and Whole Body Vibrations from Longitudinal Profile Measurements (https://www.astm.org/Standards/E3028.htm). ASTM E3028 provides a standard method to measure pathway roughness related to wheelchair user comfort and vibration exposure. BV uses the pathMet tool, developed by the pathVu team, which was designed during the project to specifically measure WPRI roughness and other ADA characteristics. Our technology partner, pathVu, is unaware of other tools that are capable of measuring WPRI according to this standard. The pathVu team has published their research findings with the Access Board (https.-I%www.access-board.gov/research/comp/eted-research/surface-roughness-final-report) and has established recommended WPRI thresholds which have been published in the Journal of Assistive Technology. Measuring pathway roughness is a critical piece in considering an accessible environment for wheelchair users and should be considered when conducting any type of ADA assessments. Agreement No. 6214 � � i� � � it � • � a BV will conduct a kick-off meetingwith the City to define cornmunication channels and the scope of work; and to review the site and program lists. Discussions will include recent and proposed capital improvements and available programs at each of the facilities and sites. Prior to the kick-off meeting, BV will provide a pre -assessment questionnaire for each site and other documentation. Documents requested, if readily available, are: • Prior Accessibility Transition Plans or Self Evaluations • Site Plans and Maps • Current Reasonable Accommodation Policy • Current reasonable accommodation policy • Intersection / street / curb plans / previous sidewalk survey Initial discussions with City Staff will include the following elements: • Roles and lines of communication between and within both the City and BV. • Protocols for interaction between all parties throughout the project. Contact information should include office and cell numbers for 2+ contacts with appropriate City Staff and BV • Field assessment logistics: Outline areas of the City's highest priority for any assessment to be completed during a pilot phase, likely complexity of assessment data processing, efficient workflow each day of the assessment; and City req u ests. • Protocol for handling paths not clearly designated on the map, not collected due to construction, or otherwise deemed inaccessible. • Strategies for connectivity between isolated urbanized areas. Field schedules and management interviews will be conducted once the schedule is approved by the City. Once the field schedule is approved, BV will deploy trained accessibility assessors with backgrounds in Accessibility, and PROW assessments. All field resources assigned have been professionally trained in accessibility assessments and have performed numerous assessments. OEM BV is experienced with the program access test defined in Title II 35.150(b), and realizes that not all amenities are required to be accessible. BV's goal is to assist the City in providing the most economically viable improvements for its users. Through consultation with staff, stakeholder surveys and ourfield observations, BVwill provide barrier removal recommendations to improve the amenities necessary to comply with the applicable standards to provide program access. An assessment of the City's programs will be performed. The United States Department of Justice defines "programs" as the "programs, services and facilities" of a Title II entity. The current status of the Client's programs as defined by the DOJ will be evaluated through discussions with Client staff and a review of documentation. The goal mandated by Title II of the ADA is to ensure that individuals with disabilities are not excluded from services, programs, and activities because buildings are inaccessible or other assistance is not available. Steps needed to make programs accessible to disabled individuals will be detailed, such as, providing sign language interpreters to enable an individual with a disability to obtain the service, or providing benefits at an alternative accessible location in order to ensure that individuals with disabilities receive the benefits or services. BV will meet with the designated representatives of the City to gather information from the various departments regarding the access opportunities or problems which have arisen in the past. BV will evaluate the issues and experiences with respect to the provision of services to people with disabilities. A program survey will address issues with respect to the delivery 20 Agreement No. 6214 .11 of accessible programs and services. A policy and program review provides a greater scope of information about structural changes required for barrier removal. The list of public programs and methods of communication with the public has not been provided to BV as part of the Client's request for a proposal. As such, BV has limited the review of said programs and communications to eighty (80) man hours. BV will work with the Client to prioritize the review to those programs with the highest impact to the community. An experienced accessibility field observerwill visit each property to observe the general condition of the traiIhead, parking, and facility interior and exterior improvements. BV will review available documents in order to familiarize themselves with each facility's specific accessibility issues BV will conduct a walk-through visit of each site in order to observe and identify physical accessibility deficiencies and formulate recommendations to eliminate the physical barriers. As a part of the assessment process, BV will meet with a client representative in order to gain a clear understanding of the overall features and programs, property condition, and completion dates of additions and/or renovations, either on -site as part of the individual site assessment or at client offices reviewing the entire client inventory Areas to be observed include all interior and exterior features of the property, including parking lots, adjacent sidewalk/pathways, recreational assets, exterior access ramps, all interior areas accessible to the public, and employee areas. The field observer will develop recommendations based on the walk-through visit and interviews with City representatives. The field observer may also question those knowledgeable of the property's physical condition and operation, or of similar systems to gain comparative information to use in evaluation of the property. The field observer will review documents and informatior property's physical improvements, extent and type of use, reported information and observed conditions. provided by the City that could aid BV's knowledge of the and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies between Duringthe walk-through, the observerwill utilize a field checklist based on the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design, the current ADA accessibility guidelines (ADAAG), applicable Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas, as well as any more stringent accessibility standards defined by the State of California and local accessibility codes. Thefield observerwill utilize a digital level, measuringtape, door pressure gauge, light and sound meters, and digital camera to evaluate existing elements to determine if barriers are present. S/he will identify and prioritize any existing improvements not in accordance with ADA, state, and local accessibility requirements, in the order of preference advised bythe Department of Justice in Title II requirements, or as modified through agreement with the Client and by public survey results, such as: • Physical access to the property • Access to interior public areas Access to common areas, including recreation facilities and other observable space • Access to restrooms Removal of remaining barriers 11 Agreement No. 6214 f he field checkiistswiil inc,�.orporate the applicaNest.andards, Sample included below, PARKING (see Guidance Section) AND PULL-UP/DROP OFF YES NO N/A NOTES ADA 2010 AREAS Section Total pkg. including Guidaince, [:A/a[uate each parking lot/facility separately Van accessible pkg= Are accessible stalls located on the shortest route to accessible 208.2 Are accessible stalk; dispersed where parking lot serves more than 1 entrance/facility so that spaces are on shortest 208.3.1 accessUe route to each? is each parking stall and access aisle separate from accessible 502.7 is each stall and access aisle a max. 2.08% grade (1:48) in all 502.4 Are the parking stall and its access aisle at the sarne level? 502.4 ls each van and car stall 96" wide minimum? Measure from the 5021, middle of stripe to middle of stripe for all measurements unless 5012 line is not adjacent to another stall or aisle f he 13V learn will assess exterior areas and interior cornmon areas that are dehned as areas of public accommodation, as W0 as the employee areas defined by the City, BVwill identify existing non comphantcoinditions, indudingbut. not Umi1ed to, theelements specified below (if specified)� ~ Spacea|[owance/ranges ° Work surfaces ° Storage ° Accessible routes, vestibules, ~ Drinking fountains and water ° Handrai|s,grab bars, tub/shower corridors coolers seats ° Protruding object - Entrances and exits ° Alarms (visual, audibie) ^ Ground/fioorsurfaces ° VVal-erc|osets ° Detectab<ewamings ° Loadingzones ~ Toilet stalls ° Teiephones = Curbnamps ~ Urinals ~ Signage(BnaiUe'visua|) ~ Ramps ~ Lauatohes,mirrors ° Seating and tab\es , Sta im ~ Bathtubs ° Switches and oudels ° Elevators ° 5hovver�sa||s ° Assembly areas " Platform hits ~ Toi|etrooms ° 5idevvalksand vva|k,�mays ° VVindovvs ° Bathrooms ° Rsrking ° Doors ° Dnessing/8ttingmoms ° Poo|s/aquadctsciUdes - Hardware ° Sinks ° Recreational assets ° interior hnishes,f|oors^base, and ° Cont/ois/openatingmechanisms ° Playgrounds and piayareas vvaUs |fproposed so|u1ionstothe idendfiedbarriers to accessibility vvouldplace anundueadminis1stiveor financial burden on (he City, 1:.1)V\Aii11 discuss Lhese soir,iUons in advance with Cily Stall i:3\/wili piovide an order o[ rna�nk:Ude (pre planning level) estimate for all h.erns of work necessary to bring each facility into compliance, All estimates will be based upon current year, cnstsvvithoutesca|ation,EscalabontacUorscanheinc\udediFpeferredbvthe[ity, 22 Agreement No. 6214 The BV team will conduct surveys of public rights -of -way. Starting with collector streets, secondary highways, and major thoroughfares, the surveys will progress to the City's residential and other streets or as designated by the City. Prior to initiating the public right-of-way portions of the contract, BV will confirm the list of sidewalks, streets and signalized intersections that will be analyzed. BV will systematically survey the sidewalk and street crossing surface environment every 10 linear feet for compliance with state, local, and Federal accessibility standards. BV will document changes in level, horizontal openings, upheavals, and other pathway events that may pose a barrier or potential hazard in the sidewalk and street crossing environment. Any major impediments and obstructions between the 10 linear foot sample markers will be recorded. BV will capture deficiency data for transit stops, signalized intersections, and un-signalized intersections, including access to pedestrian pushbuttons and the condition and presence of crosswalk markings Signalized intersections, while technically not part of the 2010 Standards for Accessible Design, are required to comply with Americans with Disability Act (ADA) if federally funded through section 504. Bureau Veritas (BV) uses the requirements for Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS) as defined In the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), BV looks at push button locations in relation to the accessible route, required elements on the push button, monitors time from button activation to walk signal, the time allowed to cross the intersection. IftheAPS is equipped with tones for the visually impaired, BV will measure the audible levels compared to the ambient noise and make sure the indicate a true sense of direction. The deliverable of the public rights -of -way survey will be in the form of an executive summary and priority listing by street segments rather than an exhaustive data collection exercise that details each sidewalk deficiency. The PROW survey will begin in those priority areas that received the highest rank and will then extend to the other areas which are part of the rights -of -way list. This evaluation will identify and record any gaps in connectivity, potential safety hazards, obstructions, missing curb ramps, and general noncompliance with accessibility regulations, includingthe following: • Assessment of the Pedestrian Right of Way (Sidewalks) Assessment of Pedestrian Crossings, Signalized Intersections, Un-signalized Intersections IRWblic Righ s 0 Way AssessirTient Process (IIfNROW P) 1"ectinoiogy The BV team will utilize a proprietary PROWAP engineered by PathVu to efficiently and accurately assess the conditions that exist in the sidewalk environment within the Client'sjurisdiction.An assessment coordinator utilizes pathMet, a pushcart system, along each sidewalk corridor, which systematically evaluates the sidewalk surface and environment for compliance with state and federal accessibility standards. The system automates the process of discovering and documenting changes in level, horizontal openings, upheavals, or other pathway events that may pose a barrier or potential hazard in the sidewalk environment. The PROWAP system provides spatial information about the features discovered, including GPS data, a digital image, and the distance along the stroll path. BV is able to provide an objective high -resolution data that inventories and characterizes sidewalk conditions. The collection device is engineered to meet ASTM standard E3028 with the output providing a route accessibility index allowing for prioritization based upon the customer's needs.. 13 Agreement No. 6214 Deliverable The sidewalk data collected is integrated, along with various 3rd party data, into the pathVu data analytics platform and is processed to provide a characterization of a span of the sidewalk. Condition and grade information are all combined to provide a comprehensive view of a walkability network and enables engineering firms and municipalities can use tc prioritize and spec the sidewalk repairs and upgrades. Reports from both data collection tools are combined and presented to the customer in GIS and Shapefiles. The sidewalk and street crossing reports will include the following: • Conversion of field data into the agreed upon format for import and use by the Client. • Spreadsheet data in Microsoft Excel format that contains a worksheet with the collected data for each feature type assessed, as well as a worksheet that contains the best path of travel data, • Relatable tables (including GPS coordinates) in a file that contain the results of the assessment. BV has experience with public outreach, including public input to the transition plan. Public outreach must be conducted prior to development of the Transition Plan, in order to determine user priorities and program opinion. BV will arrange for and conduct a public outreach meeting for the community at large. BV will reach out to local disability rights and service organizations for their valuable community input. BV's goal is to assist the City in providing the most economically viable improvements for its users. The results of the initial public outreach and the advice of the City's ADA Compliance Team will be incorporated into the Transition Plan. BV will provide barrier removal recommendations to improve the pedestrian pathways and sidewalks necessaryto complywith the applicable standards to provide program access. The ADA requires that a public entity solicit and allow for the participation of interested persons in the development of a Transition Plan The public outreach effort for the Draft Transition Plan vvill include advertisements in local newspapers in the weeks leading up to a public meeting for presentation of the draft Transition Plan. It will be the responsibility of the City to post notice of the public meeting on the City vvebsite. 14 Agreement No. 6214 PUBLIC SURVEY RESULTS FOR CITY BUILDINGS % OF % OF % OF % OF % OF RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS FEATURE WHO RATED WHO RATED WHO RATED WHO RATED WHO RATED FEATURE NO. 1 FEATURE NO. 2 FEATURE NO. 3 FEATURE NO. 4 FEATURE NO. 5 Public Restrooms 60% 0% 40% 0% 0% Accessible Seating 20% 30% 20% 20% 0% Accessible Routes 20% 30% 10% 20% 20% Entrances / Doorways 0% 10% 20% 40% 30% Parking Accommodations 0% 10% 10% 40% 40% Note: Highest percentages are highlighted. Percentages are rounded numbers. PUBLIC SURVEY RESULTS FOR CITY PARKS %OF %OF %OF %OF %OF %OF RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS FEATURE WHO RATED WHO RATED WHO RATED WHO RATED WHO RATED WHO RATED FEATURE NO. 1 FEATURE NO. 2 FEATURE NO. 3 FEATURE NO. 4 FEATURE NO. 5 FEATURE NO. 6 Parking Accommodations 55% 0% 22% 11% 11% 0% Public Restrooms 22% 44% 0% 22% 11% 0% Accessible Pavilions / Seating 11% 33% 22% 33% 0% 0% Park Trails/ Accessible Routes 11% 11% 11% 11% 33% 22% Access to Sporting Fields 0% 11% 11% 11% 22% 33% Basketball, Soccer, Softball Playgrounds 0% 0% 33% 11% 22% 44% Note: Highest percentages are highlighted. Percentages are rounded numbers. The field assessment data, costs, and programs assessment will be brought together in one document to form the Transition Plan. Once the assessments of the programs, buildings, facilities, and parks are complete, data will be analyzed and prioritized. The Transition Plan document will include all identified barriers to accessibility, associated costs for barrier removal, and tentative solutions. Solutions will be discussed with City staff and presented to stakeholders. as needed Once all PROW assessments have been completed, a Draft Transition Plan will be prepared. The Transition Plan will provide a framework for full compliance with the accessibility regulations. The Transition Plan process comprises the following components: Identification of physical and programmatic barriers in facilities under the City'sjurisdiction.. 15 Agreement No. 6214 • Determination of the barrier removal remedy and an order of magnitude estimate of the cost of the barrier removal required to eliminate the physical barrier or discriminatory practice. • Assignment of priority level to the barrier removal. • Formulation of the Transition Plan within the parameters of projected fiscal year budget constraints. Within the Transition Plan, BV will note work that shall remove physical and programmatic barriers in existing facilities, and communication barriers structural in nature; where such removal is able to be carried out without much difficulty or expense, This document will outline in detail the steps required forthe Client to achieve accessibility compliance. Where the Transition Plan identifies work which will take longer than one year to complete, a multi -year schedule with priorities will be provided nIIIIVIIINNll/,, //i. Results of the initial public outreach and the advice of the City's ADA Compliance Team will be incorporated into the Transition Plan. The Transition Plan can establish phases of barrier removal, without a calendar timeframe. To the extent that a sidewalk or intersection is not going to be fully accessible to and usable by people with disabilities in the immediate future, we will work with the ADA Compliance Team to determine the best interim procedure or policy in order to enhance accessibilityto the maximum extent possible. BVwill meetwith theADACompliance Team to presenta Draft Transition Plan and gain its input and commentary on the Draft Transition Plan prior to presentation to the community. The ADA requires that a public entity solicit and allow for the participation of interested persons in the development of a Transition Plan. The public outreach effort for the Draft Transition Plan will include advertisements in local newspapers in the weeks leading up to a public meeting for presentation of the draft Transition Plan, It will be the responsibility of the City to post notice of the public meeting on the City website. Following the public meeting, BV will meet with the ADA Compliance Team to review all applicable commentary and to make choices regarding the draft final plan to be presented to the City, Regular maintenance or rehabilitation projects and that accessibility projects are blended into other scheduled work, when possible. Following the review and inclusion of public comments in the Transition Plan, BV will submit the Final Transition Plan in printed and electronic copies to the designated parties and stakeholders. The Final Transition Plan will include an executive summary, and a description of how the entire self -evaluation and transition planning process was conducted. BVwill present the Final Transition Plan to the City at a scheduled meeting. Along with the Transition Plan and a summary, BV will prepare a PowerPoint presentation that will explain how the Transition Plan was formed, the choices which were made with respect to accessibility solutions, the manner in which budget decisions were made, and the benefits that the implementation of the Transition Plan will bring to the City. ��lau�;i�ables Deliverables are as f. . ADA Assessments- individual facility and parks reports • Public Rights -of -way Assessments- individual rights -of -way reports • Program Access and Policy Review • Public Outreach Meetings (2), Public Survey, and City Council Meeting • Transition Plan The facility assessment and program assessment reports are provided in electronic format and are typically represented in three formats: 16 Agreement No. 6214 1 Word° document converted to an Adobe PDF, with photographic images of barriers and GPS positioning of PROW barriers. 2. Excel° spreadsheet containing code references, existing conditions, resolution of the barrier, and cost data for each barrier. 3. Cloud -based database ADA AssetCALCTM. BV will provide an ADA report for each facility assessment with a description of each barrier observed and recorded, and will define the location, recorded measurements, barrier description, applicable ADAAG/state/local code reference, viable corrective action, priority, and order of magnitude (pre -planning level) cost estimate of repair. Color photographs of each barrier are included with the barrier record. Barriers will be identified and presented by individual facility. Each report will include an executive summary, including a summary cost table identifying the estimated cost to correct each facility. The Public Rights -of -Way (PROW) reports will be provided with all of the collected and derived data in a spreadsheet format compatible with Microsoft Excel and as a file geodatabase that is compatible with GIS products The PROW data is separated into two primary data sets; the Segment Data that contains surface information, and the Feature Data. Line data and point data can be spatially displayed via the GPS information recorded for the stations and features they contain. Segment Summary data is a table of information about each segment that is derived from the collected data. Feature data is separated into three different tables. The first is the spatial feature summary that contains the spatial location and type information for each feature collected. The second feature is a table created for each individual feature type collected contain the specific attribute data for that featuretype. The third table is the compliance table that derives the compliance of each feature based on a series of queries comparing the collected data and the minimum requirements of the Draft Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way (PROWAG). Both the feature data and compliance data can be joined or related to the spatial feature summary table via a unique ID that the PROW software generates. BV will use our web -based data collection tool, ADA AssetCALCTM for the PROW assessments, and for components of the Transition Plan. ADA AssetCALCT^^ gives BV the ability to generate cost tables for road segments. Similartypes of barriers can be queried within the database across all PROW coordinates, with the resultingabilityto improve purchasing and contracting power. Barriers can be ranked by priority for removal. Photos will be captured to be viewed as a photo log or individually, when reviewing a specific barrier. BV will provide a Transition Plan, which will include the program access report, presented in a Word document converted to an Adobe PDF, with the data exportable to an Excel format. BV will provide an electronic draft of the reports for review, includingtext, tables, digital photos. field notes, and supporting documentation. Final reports will be provided after all City comments have been addressed. BV'sdata collection system has pre -planning estimated costs'feature built into ourcapabilities. BV will provide cost estimates for removal of barriers and improvements. ADA AssetCALCTM cost estimating database is based on RS Means data, and further customized with proprietary cost tables developed by BV, based on historical and localized actual costs. BV maintains and updates the cost estimating system with information received from the field. Through construction monitoringwork, BV has current cost data from hundreds of in -progress construction and rehabilitation projects. This data allows BV to calculate costs based on local conditions to maintain a cost database that is typically more current than RS Means' models. Typically, barrier removal order of magnitude (pre -planning level) cost estimates are based upon the removal of the specific 17 Agreement No. 6214 element, forexample, a parkirig staII or curb ramp.ln some site -specific instances, barrier removal may affect an area'oeyond the specific location of the barrier. Grading plans based on field surveys using land surveyor instrumentation, or architectural plans requiring wall relocation could result in significantly different material quantities and subsequent higher project costs. The database contains standardized order of magnitude cost estimates for barrier removal for use in prioritizing the work in the Transition Plan. At the implementation stage of barrier removal, it is anticipated a detailed specification will be prepared and bids will be generated to establish planning level costs. The scope of work and details on adjacent impacted spaces have an impact on overall project costs, and therefore, ADA AssetCALCT"' cost estimates are pre -planning level barrier removal cost estimates. 18 Agreement No. 6214 Kataffla "Ilk j ij I A, 1-3 vi, M fr, Jr, J, 61 v Ae mtl 4", i&Gve A, 4" vp/j,"", olle Nllllllf,,� 1,21"K Woll as V,1 rv� in stef j r/v A h�f, "JAIN" m�a 4AM Ov. tvokmo'li, IP, sn� — - A-1 N: ....... . .. 19 Agreement No. 6214 ADAAssetCALCTM is aweb- basedSQLdatabasepIatformthatenablesuserstoquery,edit,and an a lyzetheirfacilityaccessibility and condition data to plan immediate and short-term barrier repairs, and budget capital expenditures throughout the lifecycle of a single building or an entire portfolio. The system unites EMG's experienced field data collection methods with advanced planning and reporting tools, construction cost library, location mapping features, digital photo management, and document storage. ADA AssetCALCTM provides clients with the ability to list, prioritize, query, and track deficiencies recorded through the Self - Assessment Process. ADAAssetCALCTM is a cloud -based, easyto use, and populated with accessibility requirements pertinent to the client. ADA AssetCALCTM provides the ability to track progress over time. Reports can be queried instantaneously to reflect barriers that have been corrected. Capabilities of ADAAssetCALCTM include, but are not limited to: • Microsoft.netweb-enabled software • Customizable fields, groupings, and reporting • Reports, charts and graphs to forecast • Progress reports and tracking of the corrective measure progress Capital budget planning tools to assign and track progress over fiscal years Corrective action work completed/ progress complete » Access to observed site conditions of barriers with photographs and GPS positions of exterior barriers • Updateable cost library makes budgets more accurate overtime Customizable priority framework and search tools to help decision makers • Export tools to take data to other applications, inducing Microsoft Excel • Repository for storing and searching documents related to buildings and component ca,ltal needs torinoyiduaI bui[ain is an constru.ci.io )roiects _ _..... ^ Ambrose Recreabon and P'wk Dst ictr r: m= nn nreae Ambrose center Park Observation List: Ambrose Center Park (26h Vflll'IIP%duuumP.O T,m,Rm U.Sa n PW`xmS4!a!U90 wercci 8s9lm F9w Lw Sv:J'J 0 6ui^a nao ,e ro hum .. xbx„nwv n:.,rq,a^ Si n '.I �cl,'el 20 Agreement No. 6214 C Q1 N + QJ C O Ln U U) O +J C QJ D_ O O v C) a) -a v U Ln uJ O D O D_ QJ C- (1 C C ti E T v E c cu QJ � L =3 Ln In N O UO 02 U) c m o' � ❑ � a j_ r � Ia y y y N fZ t m Ik. t6 Q ' U > E i. ❑ a` K ❑ ¢ m y L.a `o z E Z U E e IC'. C. E = w n T_ 3 a_ L❑ a— o� aI �- 4— W o Z > y N o _ Ul a u y y- ❑ a m S p�. F`? F L ❑ R U Vl d K N d W d liu. W d Iq W 4.. tL Q d � � 22 Agreement No. 6214 Role / Title Rate Hours Program Manager $135 199 Project Manager 1 $115 304 Project Manager II or CASp $125 372 Technical Reviewer $105 205 QC/QA Mgr, IT or Other $135 76 Admin $60 79 22 Agreement No. 6214 r , r,r,f U f 9/. %C / rL.%.. ll Fr r r, rr f t r r ✓/ //// / ///r,/d � / „✓!x r //, vfrr v W l ,f (r1111' a //1/ //// /r r/ J i//%! , ,r r � ,Y I / 1,, ,//iiii.w✓J, / n r ! J/l // DATE(MMIDDNYYY) '`''"'"�''" CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 2126l202D THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). a PRODUCER CONTACT NAME....................................,,.......,.�. ...................... Aon Risk services Northeast, Inc. PHONE FAX m 866 283 7122 ((300) 363-OIOS a Aon Risk Services Northeast, Inc„ Ac "°.g=n; tAC.Na!' _- c NY NY Office E-MAIL = One Liberty Plaza ADDRESS: 165 Broadway, Suite 3201 INSURER(5) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIL p INSURED Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Owings Mills MD 21117 USA INSURERA: Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 19682 INSURERe: Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company 30104 INSURERC: Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Co. 35300 ................................................ INS .._...... uRER D: Trumbull Insurance Company 27120 INSURER E: . _ _.. .......................................... _...,... NSURER F: r.-., .cnnrcc rc1'n TRCY c ATC K11 lh—m. S7nnR9BOR7A'.7 RF6CIginht NTIM,tl:d.Fp.... THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.,. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS,. Limits shown are as re uested INSR TYPE. Or INSURA1kCE ADDL SUaR POLICY NUMBER POLICY Err POLICY EXPITP UNITS C X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY USLOOlS9321 ffl2021: 1 1 EACHOCCURRF.NCE: $2,000,0001 r GE. To r-Nrw�r} S1,000,000 ct.Allti<,� -MArrE=. x accula r .,iASf S ffl.cc.M1sxr�nral WWWWWWWWWWW$10,•000 IT MED EXP IAny ane Ners-) -- ........,� ,._....,......�_. ..................._.... .........._.. PERSONAL &Aram INJURY .................. $2,000,000 t�l-8 -... , b7fs t11APY., l,lrt AAttIE,SPER GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000 000 PRODJCS 00,000 $2)$0 .... OTHERJFSU'f IT"IT.�,I..GU' r}............CO......%Ar'3G� ,...... 10,00.0 A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 10 AB 541202 01/01/2021 01/01/2022 CCLIABINED SIIINOI E iUMI I $2 , 000 , 000 A05I ; raa:..i.f1. ar .......................--- ® x Arana,uro 10 AB 541203 01/01/2021 01/01/2022 !Ii E r' Y IN.➢URY ( F'en lived>anl a. . ................ SCHEDULED QyUNE::C'.7 HI aOM YIINJURY - d-fl p:U Too - AUd'O`S F'�fdCUG'E::R 7`f I::YAIUAGE �..................... HIrRE.CAIIT.'' Nr1N OWNL:o E—IL,nfiC.f�:u922L ONLY ALffOS ONLY c uMBRELALIAeuC JR USL00163321 01/01/2021 01/01/2022 EACH { rrC rVIrTRG:PIrk:. $5,000,000 EXCESS LIAB COG'J" MADEhfF Af Ur F G�.....,.... $S, OOO,OOO .. .........._H OF X RETENTION 510,000 D WORKERS COMPENSATION AND 1OWNS41200 01/01)202101./01/2022 PER SIAIUTE::. �CYDI X EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY V:.t, 'See State Policy Addendum J _ ° V i. FACHAC VIIPIENT. $1,000,000, ANY PROPRIETOR I PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? I,Y NIA (Mandatory In NH) 4 E L DI IEASG "' EMF'I...O r E $1, 000, 000 If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS beiaw E.I. Ck19nF.:A3L:&"OI.ICY P.IIIME d' $1, OOO, OOO C Archit&Eng Prof USF00248021 01/01/2021 01/01/2022 Each Claim $1,000,000 claims Made Aggregate $1,000,000 SIR applies per policy to its & condi ions DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS 1 LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Addltlonal Remarks Sehedule, may be attached If mare space N required) Evidence of insurance. The Architects & Engineers policy includes coverage for Professional Liability and Contractors Pollution Liability, r`FRTIFICCTF FirTI nF=p CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.. Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 10461 Mill Run Circle Owings Mills MD 21117 USA �.�[jp9i M �' .St c/ /6LGIJIE�?d� ✓ 97EL ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016103) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 23 Agreement No. 6214 CITY OF ELSEGUNDO July 22, 2021 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN RFP NO. ENG 21-13 Dear Sir/Madam: The City of El Segundo (herein after referred to as "City") seeks to enter into a professional services agreement with a qualified, experienced firm to provide a comprehensive evaluation of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility compliance of public rights -of -way, parks, City -owned open spaces, and City buildings not already addressed in previous ADA assessments. The project will require conducting a self -evaluation and the end product will be a formal ADA Transition Plan, including estimated costs for addressing identified barriers, that will be presented to the City for review. Proposals shall be submitted by firms that have a capable and demonstrable background in the type of work described in Section 3 of this notice. In addition, all interested firms shall have sufficient, readily available resources in the form of trained personnel, support services, specialized consultants and financial resources to carry out the work without delay or shortcomings. See Section 4 for the proposal requirements. A blank copy of the standard Professional Service Agreement is provided as Appendix A for your information. Please note the insurance for the RFP require Waiver of Subrogation for the Worker's Compensation as a statute requirement. To be considered for selection, submit one electronic copy via digital media an original and three 3 itardco..ies of your jj osa] and thttie ro sai in a separate sealed envelo ex by 4:00 PM on TUESDAY, AUGUST 31, 2021. Please place your proposal materials in an envelope addressed to the person below, and marked: "PROPOSAL: AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN RFP NO. ENG 21-23" Thank you for your interest in this project, Floriza Rivera City of El Segundo Public Works Department 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 ��ciorc:rr �.�, 310-524-2361 Page 1 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Scope of Services Section 2 General Conditions and Requirements Section 3 Statement of Works Section 4 Proposal Requirements Section 5 Selection Process Appendices RFP NO. ENG 21-13 A. Professional Service Agreement Contract Template B. Facility List C. Pavement Management Program Report and Street List D. Parking Lot List and Maps E. Parks and Open Spaces List F. 2019 Facility Condition Assessment Files (Downloadable files only upon request) G. GIS Street Centerline Shapefiles (Downloadable files only upon request) Page 2 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 �.. .��� � . .. .- ... .. SECTION 1:SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.1 BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Located on the western edge of Los Angeles County, the City of El Segundo is a coastal community of residential, commercial, and industrial land. Its boundaries are the Pacific Ocean on the west, the Los Angeles Airport to the north, the City of Hawthorne to the east, and the City of Manhattan Beach to the south. Within its 5.5 square mile area the City of El Segundo has a 2021 population of approximately 16,660 (California Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit). The daytime employment population is considerably larger and has historically been as much as 80,000. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became Federal law on January 26, 1992, with the fundamental goal of the ADA being to ensure equal access to civic life by people with disabilities. The Act comprises five titles prohibiting discrimination against disabled persons within the United States. Title II of the ADA required state and local governments to make their programs, services and activities accessible to persons with disabilities. The City of El Segundo wishes to retain a firm to conduct a City self -evaluation and generate an ADA Transition Plan, which would identify existing obstacles limiting accessibility as well as describe and estimate steps to be taken to ensure that City facilities and public right-of-way elements are made accessible to all individuals. 1.2 STANDARDS 1.2-1 Latest Editions CONSULTANT shall perform all services under the Agreement in conformance and in compliance with the latest editions of: • United States Access Board's ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings & Facilities (ADAAG) ; • Federal Highway Administration's California Edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) ; • California Dept. of General Services' Division of the State Architect's California Access Compliance Reference Materials, inclusive of relevant California Building Code sections; • Revised Final Title II Rule: A Compilation of Regulatory Provisions and Guidance -- Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services; • Public Rights of Way Guideline (PROWAG); • Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (SSPWC) for general provisions, special provisions and technical specifications; and • other applicable Standards. 1.2-2 Reports, Deliverable Documents, and Estimates (ADA Transition Plan) The ADA Transition Plan and other deliverable documents shall be prepared in English units and in conformance with the latest editions of applicable standards. 1.2-3 Conflicts/Design Exceptions In case of conflict, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors, or omissions, CONSULTANT shall submit the matter to City for clarification. Any work affected by such conflicts, ambiguities, Page 3 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 discrepancies, errors or omissions which is performed by CONSULTANT shall be at CONSULTANT'S risk and expense including any CONSULTANT work to remedy such shortcomings. 1.2-4 Reference Materials CONSULTANT shall make use of additional reference material as appropriate. CONSULTANT shall also be responsible for ensuring the most recent version of all reference materials are used, including any addenda and errata. CONSULTANT shall have knowledge of and utilize all applicable Local, County, State, and Federal ADA laws, guidelines, procedures, templates, rules, and resources in the development of this ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan. SECTION 2: GENERAL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 2.1 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF WORK Upon acceptance of the successful response to this Request for Proposals (RFP) the selected firm will utilize the "Scope of Work" as part of the contract entered with the City. The selected firm will be expected to perform all technical and other analyses necessary to complete the scope of work, including but not limited to, the following: 1. Identify City facilities, public rights -of -way, parks, and open spaces that have not been included in any previous ADA assessments that may be discriminatory to people with disabilities and identify any existing obstacles/barriers limiting accessibility; 2. Review City policies, practices, and procedures which govern the maintenance, repair, and upgrade of City facilities, public rights -of -way, parks, and open spaces; 3. Provide a detailed outline of methods necessary to remove accessibility barriers; 4. Conduct ADA compliance evaluation of City buildings, public rights -of -way, parks and open spaces; 5. Specify a schedule for achieving compliance; 6. Identify the official(s) who will be responsible for implementation of the plan; and 7. Prepare the City's ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan. The ADA Transition Plan will provide recommendations for complying with accessibility requirements as mandated by the ADA and State of California Access Codes. It will also provide the basis for prioritizing, budgeting, implementing and monitoring barrier removal. 2.1-1 CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the reports, plans, specifications, estimates, and related material prepared by CONSULTANT for the project. CONSULTANT shall independently check and identify the author and checker for all such material prior to any submittal. It is the CONSULTANT'S responsibility to ensure that the ADA Transition Plan is feasible to accomplish with the constraints that are determined during the self - evaluation. CONSULTANT shall ensure their design is American Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant and shall attest to meeting this minimum criteria. 2.1-2 The estimates, calculations, reports, and other documents furnished under this Scope of Work shall be of a quality acceptable to the City. The minimum criteria for acceptance shall be a product of neat appearance that is well organized, technically and grammatically correct, and thoroughly checked. Page 4 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG21-13 2.1-3 The page identifying preparers of report and maps or drawings shall bear the title and signature of the engineer(s) or professional(s) responsible for their preparation. 2.1-4 The CONSULTANT shall maintain a set of project files that are indexed in accordance with a filing system provided or approved by the City. 2.1-5 At the completion of this Scope of Work, all files and correspondence relating to the Project shall be turned over to the City. This includes all working data, field data, and background information used in creating the deliverables identified in the Scope of Work. 2.1-6 CONSULTANT shall submit all final documents on a USB flash drive using original Microsoft Office software, CAD file, or GIS file format as applicable, as well as submit copies using PDF file format as required by the City. 2.1-7 CONSULTANT shall assist in understanding contract objectives and requirements, CONSULTANT will hold regular meetings with the City. If the original established schedule is insufficient, CONSULTANT will hold additional meetings as necessary. The primary purpose of these meetings is to discuss work objectives, CONSULTANT's work schedule, the terms of the contract and other related issues. In addition, the meetings will serve as a forum for resolving any issues related to the report development. 2.1-8 CONSULTANT may establish direct contact with governmental regulatory and resource agencies and others to obtain information, expertise, and assistance in developing the ADA Transition Plan. CONSULTANT shall maintain a record of such contacts and shall transmit copies of those records to the City on a regular basis. At a minimum, these records shall be transmitted monthly or more frequently, when the content or extent of the records so warrants. 2.1-9 The CONSULTANT will retain responsibility for final consultation, informal and formal, with state and federal agencies regarding compliance with the ADA Transition Plan requirements. 2.1-10 CONSULTANT shall comply with OSHA regulations regarding safety equipment and procedures. If needed while investigating, CONSULTANT's personnel shall wear appropriate safety vests and personal protective equipment as required. CONSULTANT shall have appropriate training including but not limited to OSHA. Costs for said training shall be at the sole cost of the CONSULTANT and at no additional cost to the City. It shall be the sole responsibility of the CONSULTANT to renew and ensure training is up to date. 2.1-11 CONSULTANT shall designate a Public Outreach Manager who will coordinate CONSULTANT's employee outreach, public outreach and public right-of-way, parks, and open space accessibility self -evaluation operations. The Public Outreach Manager shall be responsible for all matters related to CONSULTANT's self -evaluation operations but shall coordinate with CONSULTANT's Project Manager. 2.1-12 If needed, CONSULTANT shall designate a Land Survey Manager to coordinate CONSULTANT's land surveying operations. This individual shall be responsible for all matters related to CONSULTANT's land surveying operations but shall coordinate with CONSULTANT's Project Manager. If applicable, land surveys performed by CONSULTANT shall conform to the Page 5 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 requirements of the Land Surveyors Act and per City's direction. In accordance with the Act, "responsible charge" for the work shall reside with a Registered Civil Engineer registered prior to January 1, 1982, or a Licensed Land Surveyor, in the State of California. 2.1-13 Reports shall be submitted in draft as scheduled, and the opportunity provided for the City to direct revisions, prior to final submission. 2.1-14 Throughout the project, CONSULTANT will consider least cost alternatives analysis for major barrier removals, where appropriate and feasible. 2.1-15 City Project Manager will administer CONSULTANT contract and provide general direction to CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT is responsible for providing Quality Assurance Program. The City will review and approve the CONSULTANT'S proposed QA / QC program and audit CONSULTANT for compliance with the approved program. 2.1-16 Any costs incurred by the City due to CONSULTANT's failure to meet the standards required by the scope of work or CONSULTANT's failure to perform fully the tasks described in the scope of work which, in either case, causes the City to request that CONSULTANT perform again all or part of the Scope of Work shall be at the sole cost of CONSULTANT and the City shall not pay any additional compensation to CONSULTANT for its re -performance. 2.1-17 CONSULTANT may be required to modify the ADA Transition Plan and the CONSULTANT's estimate, at no cost to the City, if the Plan is not compliant to the previously mentioned standards. Any such modifications shall be submitted in a timely fashion. SECTION 3: STATEMENT OF WORK 3.1 TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT/ COORDINATION/ ADMINISTRATION This task covers project management services including the requirements for meetings, schedules, progress reports, invoicing, and administration of CONSULTANT's work. Refer to section 4 for identifying the CONSULTANT'S project team for the project. 3.1-1 Project Management Plan CONSULTANT shall prepare a comprehensive Project Management Plan to communicate the scope of work, constraints, and technical requirements to all project participants. The plan shall identify the procedures and technical requirements that are to be followed in developing the ADA Transition Plan. The project management plan shall also describe the responsibilities of each participant in the project. At a minimum the following items should be included in the project management plan: •, Introduction: Project description, background, objectives, approach, etc. • Scope of work and task listing • Project organization • Key project staff names and responsibilities • Project schedule • Applicable design standards and codes listing • Applicable computer software programs Page 6 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 • Communications procedures • Project administrative procedures: filing system, communication protocol, etc. • Project budget, fee schedule and invoicing • Quality management procedures • City's RFP • Proposer's proposal • Professional Services Agreement • Any other related project information 3.1-2 Coordination/Administration 3.1-2a Coordination and Meetings CONSULTANT shall participate in regular Project Development Team (PDT) Meetings with the City to discuss issues pertinent to the performance of the Project and development of the Transition Plan. Following are the meeting materials that CONSULTANT will be responsible for preparing and providing: • Notices • Agendas • Handouts • Minutes • Progress plans 3.1-2b Administration Following are administrative duties, which shall be performed by CONSULTANT: • Supervise subconsultants, coordinate, and monitor work for conformance with set standards and policies. • Apply for and obtain no -fee Public Works encroachment permit(s) and other City approvals as required for CONSULTANT to be on jobsites or for self -evaluation purposes. • Prepare, circulate, and file correspondence and memoranda as appropriate. • Maintain Project files using the City specified filing system. • Within Twenty days of Notice to Proceed, CONSULTANT shall submit the final Project Master Schedule to the City Project Manager. Section 3.1-3 contains of description of the Master Schedule. 3.1-3 Schedules CONSULTANT shall submit an initial Project Master Schedule in a format acceptable to the City with 20 days following Notice to Proceed. The City will provide the CONSULTANT with key milestone dates that the Master Schedule must meet. The City seeks to have a final ADA Transition Plan completed eight (8) months from issuance of Notice to Proceed. If the CONSULTANT deems this unreasonable based on prior experience, a suitable completion date shall be clearly identified in writing, and an explanation given as to why the preferred completion date would be unrealistic. The following elements must be included by CONSULTANT in the Schedule: • Work items and deliverables identified in accordance with a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) as developed by CONSULTANT and approved by the City. Page 7 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 • Work items of agencies and other third parties that may affect or be affected by CONSULTANT's activities • The Design Schedule shall identify critical path elements. The order, sequence, and interdependence of all work items shall be reflected on the Schedule. Major tasks should be broken down into subtasks as warranted. • Monthly schedule updates will be part of the Progress Report and will be in accordance with the requirements shown in Section 3.1-4. 3.1-4 Progress Reports CONSULTANT shall report monthly on the progress of the work. Progress shall be based on physical percent complete such as number of deliverables completed or estimated progress toward completion. Progress payments will be based upon percent complete of the major tasks identified. CONSULTANT shall submit one copy of a monthly Progress Report to the City's Project Manager consisting of a written narrative and an updated bar chart format of the Project Master Schedule. The narrative portion of the monthly Progress Report shall describe overall progress of the work, discuss significant problems and present proposed corrective action, and show the status of major changes. This report shall be received no later than the tenth (1 Oth) calendar day of the month following the report month. All schedule tasks shall be updated to reflect current percent complete. If the latest completion time for a significant work item does not fall within the time allowed by the original Project Master Schedule, the sequence of work and/or duration, with the concurrence of the City's Project Manager, may be revised by CONSULTANT through concurrent operations, additional staffing or overtime, until the resultant schedule indicates that all significant milestone dates will be met. CONSULTANT'S additional staffing or overtime will be at the sole cost of the CONSULTANT and at no additional cost to the City. Should, during the course of the work, the CONSULTANT fall behind in overall performance in accordance with the current schedule, a project management meeting will be called to determine the cause. If cause is found to be due to CONSULTANT performance, payment to CONSULTANT may be withheld pending the submittal of an action plan outlining the steps, which will be taken to correct the identified delay(s). The initial Project Master Schedule, referenced in Section 3.1-3, as agreed to by the City shall become the project target. The baseline schedule shall be displayed on the updated Project Master Schedule. Changes to the baseline schedule shall be approved by the City's Project Manager. Page 8 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 3.1-5 Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA / QC) Plan CONSULTANT shall maintain a Quality Assurance / Quality Control Plan throughout performance of the services under this Agreement. The QA / QC Plan is intended to ensure that reports, maps and drawings, estimates, and other documents submitted under the Agreement are complete, accurate, checked, conform to standards, and proofread to meet professional practices in effect at the time of execution of the Agreement, and of a quality acceptable to the City. The following quality control elements are required of the CONSULTANT throughout the preparation of ADA Transition Plan for the project. • Providing independent checking and verification of all measurements • Maps or documents showing items evaluated being marked clearly as being checked and on what date, signifying that the preparation of the material followed the QA / QC Plan established for the project. • Routing pertinent project related correspondence and memoranda to affected personnel and bind in appropriate project files. • Identifying critical QA reviews within the Project Master Schedule. • The QA / QC Plan including a procedure where each deliverable is certified by the Quality Manager or CONSULTANT Project Manager as being prepared and checked in accordance with the approved QA / QC Plan. • Certification of each deliverable by the Quality Manager or CONSULTANT Project Manager as being prepared and checked in accordance with the approved QA / QC Plan. • CONSULTANT's Project Manager or Quality Manager being qualified and certified to implement Quality Control and Quality Assurance program. • Conforming to the City's independent quality surveillance, monitoring and audits. Such quality surveillance, monitoring and audits will be performed by City staff and may be scheduled or ad hoc. Within 30 days of receiving the Notice to Proceed, CONSULTANT shall submit a complete copy of the QA / QC Plan to the City Project Manager for review. CONSULTANT Deliverables: • Three (3) copies of the Project Management Plan at the kick-off meeting. • The CONSULTANT shall plan to attend at least three status meetings with City staff —a kick-off meeting, interim progress meeting and a final completion meeting at minimum, in addition to any required site visits and City staff meetings needed for self -evaluation investigations and document research. • The CONSULTANT shall also plan to attend and present the ADA Transition Plan to the City Council at a future public City Council meeting. • Meeting notices, agendas, handouts, minutes, monthly invoices. • Project Master Schedule due at the kick-off meeting— 2 copies plus one USB flash drive in a Microsoft Project format. Schedule updated and maintained throughout the project. • Monthly progress reports to accompany each monthly invoice. • Two (2) hard copies of QA / QC Plan plus one electronic copy on a USB flash drive, submitted to the City Project Manager within 30 days of receiving the Notice to Proceed. Page 9 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 3.2 Task 2 — OVERSEE DEVELOPMENT AND EXECUTION OF SELF -EVALUATION REPORT AND ADA TRANSITION PLAN 1. The CONSULTANT shall perform an initial investigation and document review prior to the ADA Transition Plan Development. Aspects of this initial investigation shall include: a. Review existing City ADA-related documents and information, Facility Condition Assessments, as -built drawings, and any other related and necessary reports that document City's most recent land development changes. b. Review all applicable City and regulatory agency policies and procedures related to accessibility including all local, county, state and federal policies, laws, regulations, and guidelines. c. During the ADA Transition Plan development, the CONSULTANT shall assist the City in designating an ADA Coordinator and ADA liaisons from relevant departments to serve as an ongoing work group. The CONSULTANT shall train designated City staff, at a minimum, in the following areas: i. Describing project delivery and necessary steps CONSULTANT will perform ii. Applicable government code, statutes and regulations; iii. Procedures and forms to be used for performing field investigations and inspections; iv. Procedures and forms to conduct Self -Evaluation; v. Preparation of ADA Compliance Assessment Reports; vi. Using and maintaining the database; vii. Using and maintaining the project map; viii. Monitoring and updating the ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan; ix. Internal procedures for granting exemptions for City projects. 2. The CONSULTANT shall develop a process, procedures, and forms needed to conduct the Self -Evaluation of the City facilities, public rights -of -way, parks, and open spaces for ADA requirement compliance, including the compilation of the final Self -Evaluation report. CONSULTANT Deliverables include: a. Develop a master list of City facilities, public rights -of -way, parks, and open spaces, facility maintenance and repair accessibility policies, etc. b. Review appropriate City plans, reports, and programs, and meet with City staff to gain insight into the City's facilities to identify issues, which may be discriminatory to people with disabilities. The review will also include City maintenance and repair policies that affect the public. The review should evaluate the current level of accessibility, facilities used, grievance procedures, and emergency procedures. c. Create and administer Barrier Assessment Surveys to collect information on each program and activity. Surveys should encourage staff to provide details regarding forms and methods used to advertise program or department activities and services, profile of current participants, the types of equipment and materials used, testing and entrance requirements, amount of staff training, and list any specific modifications that are needed or have been provided in the past. d. Based on Barrier Assessment Surveys and policy reviews, evaluate the effectiveness of existing ADA program services and provide recommendations where deficiencies are identified. e. Summarize the data and findings in the Self -Evaluation and ADA Transition Plan, Page 10 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 including Barrier Assessment Surveys and Access Compliance Assessment Reports for City facilities, parks, open spaces, and public rights -of -way as described in Task 2 and Task 3 below. Meet with City staff at least three times, including a kick-off meeting, interim progress meeting, and completion meeting. This will be in addition to any required site visits and City staff meetings deemed necessary by the CONSULTANT for self -evaluation investigations and document research. 3.3 Task 3 - CONDUCT COMPREHENSIVE FACILITY SURVEYS AND BARRIER ASSESSMENTS This task shall be performed and completed in three (3) Phases as follows: (A) Public Buildings (those not already addressed in previous ADA assessments), and (B) Public Right -of -Way, and (C) Public Parks and Open Spaces. The CONSULTANT shall build upon existing information and develop the comprehensive ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan based upon the results of barrier assessments, policy review and City staff guidance for each phase mentioned above. The ADA Transition Plan shall include all requisite information necessary to comply with Title II of the ADA for such a plan, which may include the following: • Methodology for the self -evaluation of existing barriers to accessibility; • Summary of the findings of the self -evaluation of facilities and maintenance/repair policies; • Recommendations of remedial measures to correct deficiencies and a methodology for the prioritization of barrier remediation; • Cost estimates of remediation measures; • Implementation schedule that includes milestones or measures of achievement for monitoring implementation; • Procedure for periodically reviewing and updating the Transition Plan; • Procedures for addressing grievances; and • Assignment of responsibilities for repair/replacement. 3.3.1 (A) Public Buildings — Phase 1 1. CONSULTANT shall review public buildings not already addressed in previous ADA assessments to build upon and add to the City's existing ADA-related facility information. Facility Condition Assessments contain previous City ADA findings. 2. CONSULTANT shall develop the procedures and forms needed to conduct field surveys and the Self -Evaluation. 3. The CONSULTANT shall review and evaluate current City policies, programs, and practices to identify issues which may be discriminatory to people with disabilities. The review will include City policy documents that affect the public. The review should evaluate the current level of program accessibility, including eligibility requirements, participation requirements, facilities used, staffing, transportation, communication, grievance procedures and emergency procedures. 4. Identify which City buildings not already addressed in previous ADA assessments are subject to the requirements of the ADA, and develop assessments, including but not Page 11 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 limited to, path of travel and Barrier Assessment Surveys, listing each item. This includes City -owned buildings, including but not limited to, common areas throughout such buildings. 5.. Conduct Barrier Assessment Surveys with field investigations and surveys of public buildings in El Segundo identified in Item 4 above, that provide programs, services, or activities to the public, as appropriate. The Surveys will identify physical barriers in each facility that could limit accessibility and compare each facility to the State Title 24 Building Code and the Federal ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). i. Based on the Barrier Assessment Surveys, develop Access Compliance Assessment Reports (ACARs) to support the comprehensive assessment process, which shall include: a. Executive summary; b. As -built verifications as it relates to ADA access; c. Barrier description and severity rating to measure relative impact to access; d. Digital photograph(s) and documentation of each barrier; e. Reference drawings/maps showing the specific location of the barrier; f. Proposed solution(s) to eliminate the barrier; and g. Individual detailed cost estimates for each solution. 6. The consultant shall review all ACARs and develop facility diagrams for each building from information gathered in Item 5 above, showing interior and exterior areas to be included in the ADA Transition Plan as appropriate and provide a comprehensive report. The consultant shall summarize the ACARs and identify issues that may limit physical access to individuals with disabilities to public areas where program, services, or activities take place. Each section of the Self Evaluation Report shall include a feasible solution, cost estimate for eliminating each barrier and the priority level of the project. 7, Refer to Appendix B for a City Facility List. Appendix F, Facility Condition Assessment Files, is available for download only upon request due to the size and number of files. 3.3.2 (B) Public Right -of -Way (ROW) — Phase 2 1. The CONSULTANT shall develop the procedures and forms needed to conduct field surveys and the Self -Evaluation. 2. The CONSULTANT shall review and evaluate current City policies, programs, and practices to identify issues which may be discriminatory to people with disabilities. The review will include City policy documents that affect the public. The review should evaluate the current level of program accessibility, including eligibility requirements, participation requirements, facilities used, staffing, transportation, communication, grievance procedures and emergency procedures. 3. Survey the City's inventory of public right-of-way and identify which public right -of way items are subject to the requirements of the ADA, and develop Barrier Assessment Surveys, listing each Item. Items shall include but not be limited to: • Street intersections (curb ramps and crosswalks) • Pathways • Sidewalks • Public streets Public alleyways • Pedestrian signals and pushbuttons • City parking lots Page 12 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 • Transit stops • City Electric Vehicle Charging Stations The CONSULTANT will not collect any sidewalk data on the non -El Segundo portion of State highways, County streets, City of Los Angeles streets, City of Manhattan Beach streets, City of Hawthorne streets, or privately -owned streets. 4. Conduct Barrier Assessment Surveys with field investigations and surveys of all public right-of-way in El Segundo, as appropriate. The Surveys will identify physical barriers in public right-of-way that could limit accessibility and compare these areas to the draft Public Rights of Way Guideline (PROWAG) from the U.S. Access Board, the Federal Highway Administration's California Edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), California Code of Regulations/Title 24, State Title 24 Building Code, and the Federal ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). i. Based on the Barrier Assessment Surveys, develop Access Compliance Assessment Reports (ACARs) to support the comprehensive assessment process, which shall include: 1. Executive summary; 2. As -built verifications as it relates to ADA access; 3. Barrier description and severity rating to measure relative impact to access; 4. Digital photograph(s) and documentation of each barrier; 5. Reference drawings/maps showing the specific location of the barrier; 6. Proposed solution(s) to eliminate the barrier; and 7. Individual detailed cost estimates for each solution. The consultant shall review all ACARs and develop facility diagrams showing all areas to be included in the ADA Transition Plan, as appropriate. The consultant shall summarize the ACARs and identify issues that may limit physical access to individuals with disabilities to public right-of-way. Each section of the Self Evaluation Report shall include a feasible solution, cost estimate for eliminating each barrier and the priority level of the project. Refer to Appendix C for a list of City streets within a Pavement Management Program report. Refer to Appendix D for a City parking lot list and maps. Please note, the parking structure at Grand Ave./Richmond St. and the Transit Way parking lot off Douglas Street are shown on the maps but are not City -owned. Appendix G, GIS Street Centerline Shapefiles, is available for download upon request due to the size and number of files. 3.3.3 (C) Public Parks and Open Spaces — Phase 3 1. The CONSULTANT shall develop the procedures and forms needed to conduct field surveys and the Self -Evaluation. 2. The CONSULTANT shall review and evaluate current City policies, programs, and practices to identify issues which may be discriminatory to people with disabilities. The review will include City policy documents that affect the public. The review should evaluate the current level of program accessibility, including eligibility requirements, participation requirements, facilities used, staffing, transportation, communication, grievance procedures and emergency procedures. 3. Identify which parks, trails, outdoor facilities, and open spaces are subject to the requirements of the ADA, and develop Barrier Assessment Surveys, listing each item. 4. Conduct Barrier Assessment Surveys with field investigations and surveys of all public Page 13 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 parks, trails, outdoor facilities, and open spaces in El Segundo that provide programs, services, or activities to the public, as appropriate. The Surveys will identify physical barriers in each park, trail, outdoor facility, and open space that could limit accessibility as identified in the State Title 24 Building Code and the Federal ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). i. Based on the Barrier Assessment Surveys, develop Access Compliance Assessment Reports (ACARs) to support the comprehensive assessment process, which shall include: a. Executive summary; b. As -built verifications as it relates to ADA access; c. Barrier description and severity rating to measure relative impact to access; d. Digital photograph(s) and documentation of each barrier; e. Reference drawings/maps showing the specific location of the barrier; f. Proposed solution(s) to eliminate the barrier; and g. Individual detailed cost estimates for each solution. 5. The consultant shall review all ACARs and develop facility diagrams showing areas to be included in the ADA Transition Plan as appropriate, for each park, trail, outdoor facility, and open space. The consultant shall summarize the ACARs and identify issues that may limit physical access to individuals with disabilities to public areas where program, services, or activities take place. Each Section of the Self Evaluation Report shall include a feasible solution, cost estimates for eliminating each barrier and the priority level of the project. 6. Refer to Appendix E for City list identifying all public parks and open spaces. Please note, Wiseburn Aquatic Center is privately -owned. Deliverable(s) are as follows for each of the three (3) phases, as applicable 1. Using the collected inspection date for each of the three (3) phases, develop and provide to the City a spreadsheet summarizing the data identified above, preliminary recommendations, and a list of recommended remedies. The following repair categories are anticipated for inclusion in the spreadsheet across all primary categories/phases, subject to the CONSULTANT'S review of federal and state requirements and recommended repair/replacement strategy: a. Sidewalk grinding; b. Sidewalk replacement, including approximate size, and if tree root removal or curb/gutter replacement is included; c. Crack and hole filling; d. ADA deficiencies, including specific recommendations to remedy deficiencies. 2. Compile draft and prepare final Self -Evaluation report. 3. Facility Report — Develop or update reports for each site and building, identifying items that limit physical access to individuals with disabilities to public areas where program, services or activities take place. The report should include a feasible solution, cost estimate for the removal of each barrier, and the priority level of the project. 4. Facility Diagrams & Inventory — Produce facility diagrams of the surveyed areas of City buildings, facilities, parking lots and structures, parks, and the public street Right- of-way for use in the ADA Transition Plan. Diagrams shall note the location of the barriers that limit ADA accessibility. Page 14 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 3.4 Task 4 - COMPREHENSIVE ADA SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN 1. Develop a comprehensive ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan based upon the results of the barrier assessments, policy reviews, and City staff guidance. The ADA Transition Plan shall include all requisite information necessary to comply with Title II of the ADA for such a plan, including but not limited to, the following a. Incorporation of existing City ADA-related information into the plan b. Methodology for the self -evaluation of existing barriers to accessibility including how to remove them; c. Summary of findings of the self -evaluation of facilities, policies, and practices; d. Recommendations of remedial measures to correct deficiencies and a methodology for the prioritization of barrier remediation; b. Cost estimates of remediation measures; c. Implementation schedule that includes milestones or measures of achievement for monitoring implementation; d. Procedures and forms for monitoring implementation; e. Procedures for periodically reviewing and updating the ADA Transition Plan; f. Procedures and forms for performing evaluations of additional barriers; g. Procedures and forms for filing Requests for Accommodation; h. List of references and contact information for ADA and accessibility related resources; and i. Identification of the official(s) who will be responsible for implementation of the plan. 3. Present the draft ADA Transition Plan, and subsequently, the final proposed ADA Transition Plan and findings to City staff. a. Provide one digital and three (3) bound copies of the final Self -Evaluation Report and ADA Transition Plan to the City. Provide editable electronic copies in both Microsoft Word and PDF formats. All data files and project maps and drawings associated with the Self -Evaluation Report and the ADA Transition Plan shall be delivered to the City and become the property of the City. 4. Both the Self -Evaluation Report and the ADA Transition Plan shall be completed no later than May 2, 2022. 3.5 Task 5 - PUBLIC OUTREACH PROGRAM CONSULTANT will be tasked to provide community outreach effort during the self -evaluation stage. is to include an appropriate number of public surveys, public outreach meetings and City Council meetings in their proposal. CONSULTANT shall propose and lead a public outreach plan and process that encourages participation and input from the community. It is critical CONSULTANT provides engagement methods that reach all interested persons, including individuals with disabilities or organizations representing individuals with disabilities and all populations considered at -risk in the current environment, which shall at minimum provide for the submission of comments virtually on this project. The CONSULTANT shall utilize digital tools that may include, but are not limited to, phone and video conference community meetings, virtual open houses or workshops, or online surveys, to encourage public participation in the current environment. The City is Page 15 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 supportive of other creative measures to foster public outreach. All proposed engagement methods must be included in the public outreach plan that is submitted to the City for final approval before implementation. 2. CONSULTANT shall work with the City staff to invite and attend virtual and, if possible, based on current health and safety restrictions, in -person meetings to include representatives of the City's community to review each element of the plan and provide comment. Interested members of the public should also be invited to attend virtual and/or in -person Committee meetings and provide public comment. Deliverable (s) • Provision of a public outreach plan for this project that incorporates virtual and digital methodologies, including two (2) virtual community meetings, at minimum, with the appropriate presentation material (s) . 3.6 Task 6 - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES This task shall be proposed and completed in three (3) Phases as follows: (A) Public Buildings, (B) Public Right -of -Way, and (C) Public Parks and Open Spaces. The following item for this task shall be completed for each phase. In conjunction with the recommendations identified above, CONSULTANT shall develop preliminary cost estimates, including contingencies, to implement consultant recommendations for ADA accessibility in accordance with all federal, state and regulatory requirements. CONSULTANT shall review contingences with City staff prior to submittal. Deliverable(s) for each of the three (3) phases: • CONSULTANT shall develop a city-wide reference map using AutoCAD software showing City-wide barrier removal areas. Drawing files and .pdf files of the map shall be submitted to the City. • CONSULTANT will develop a preliminary cost estimate technical submittal with an executive summary. The executive summary shall be signed and stamped by a registered civil engineer. • All cost estimates shall be attached and shall be in a format agreeable to City staff. • Backup and source information for all quantities and unit prices used by the CONSULTANT shall be included as an appendix. • The deliverable shall be provided to the City in an electronic PDF format and three (3) hard copies. • Microsoft Excel files of all cost estimates shall also be submitted to the City. 3.7 Task 7 - FINAL ADA SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN For each phase, the CONSULTANT shall develop the comprehensive ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan based upon the results of the barrier assessments, policy review and City staff guidance. It will also include the compilation of the deliverables noted above, including the compilation of deliverables for tasks with multiple phases. The Transition Plan shall include all requisite information necessary to comply with Title II of the ADA for such a plan, including, but not limited to the following: Page 16 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 • Executive summary signed and stamped by the project manager and registered civil engineer if the project manager is not registered. • Methodology for the self -evaluation of existing barriers to accessibility • Summary of the findings of the self -evaluation of facilities, policies, programs, and practices • Recommendations of remedial measures to correct deficiencies and a methodology for the prioritization of barrier remediation • Cost estimates of remediation measures • Implementation schedule that includes milestones or measures of achievement for monitoring implementation • Procedure for periodically reviewing and updating the Transition Plan Deliverable (s) : • Phased implementation plan at the Capital Improvement Project programming level for the following terms: o Short Term (within the next 5 years) o Intermediate Term (within 6-10 years) o Long Term (over 10 years) • Ten (10) bound copies of the final ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan executive summary for the City of"El Segundo shall be provided, as well as editable electronic copies in both Microsoft Word, other software formats as applicable, and PDF formats. All data files and project maps associated with the field investigations and facility evaluations shall be delivered to City staff. 3.8 Task 8 — OPTIONAL TASKS Optional Task A — GIS INTEGRATION AND A CITY-WIDE GIS REFERENCE MAP If approved, this task shall be proposed and completed in three (3) Phases as follows: (A) Public Buildings, (B) Public Right -of -Way, and (C) Parks. The following items for this task shall be completed for each phase. The CONSULTANT shall develop a city-wide reference map using ESRI ArcView GIS showing City-wide barrier removal areas and facilities needing accessible entry ramps. The reference map will include, but is not limited to, associated database with condition data; barrier type, ramp type, slope, landing area, warning surface and other compliance information. This information is not currently available in or anticipated by way of a future project in El Segundo's GIS. 2. The CONSULTANT shall develop a city-wide reference map using GIS showing curb ramps including, but not limited to, associated database with condition data; ramp type, slope, landing area, warning surface and other compliance information. This information is not currently available in or anticipated by way of a future project in El Segundo's GIS. 3. The CONSULTANT shall develop a citywide reference map using GIS for sidewalks and condition data of sidewalks (uplifts, cracks, width, repair priority). 4. El Segundo's GIS Program maintains numerous layers and databases and will supply Page 17 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 parcel outlines as shapefile and aerial imagery as a map service consumable through the internet. El Segundo's GIS does not include data for sidewalks or ramps but does include street centerlines, if needed. 5. The City anticipates that the CONSULTANT will use tablets or similar devices for the field data collection using GIS data collection software. It is anticipated that the data collected in the field will be done using heads -up digitizing methods but capturing the coordinates that define any collected sidewalk data. The area from curb edge to curb edge should be provided as a polygon shapefile in addition to field collection of sidewalk centerline as line shapefile. 6. A comment or note field should also be included so the field staff can enter any special notes or anomalies. The City staff may ask for additional data fields, but none have been defined at this time. The CONSULTANT will not be collecting any sidewalk data on State highways, County streets, or privately -owned streets. 7. CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the City's GIS staff regarding format. At a minimum, all data collected will be in a shapefile format. The CONSULTANT will define the fields for each feature data set and get approval from the City staff before beginning the field data collection. Deliverable(s) are as follows for each of the three (3) phases: • Hardcopies of maps in 11 " x 17" format compiled in a binder. • Electronic submittal shall be provided as a file geodatabase complying to the requirements of the City's GIS staff. At the conclusion of each phase, the CONSULTANT will submit the GIS data to the City to be included in the City's GIS. • The CONSULTANT will also submit the attribute data to the City as an Excel file. CONSULTANT will confirm to the City's GIS staff if it is including common key to join the excel attribute data to the GIS or if the attributes will be included in the GIS directly. Optional Task B — PROJECT DATABASE If approved, the CONSULTANT shall develop a database encompassing data for each of the primary categories/phases for the ADA Transition Plan using Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Access or other City -approved software. The CONSULTANT may recommend appropriate database software for the City's consideration. The purpose of the database is to facilitate ongoing monitoring and updating of the final comprehensive ADA Transition Plan by City staff. The database shall correlate all components of the transition plan including but not limited to Compliance and Facility reports, Facility Diagrams, Transition Plans, reference drawings, standard drawings, and photographs. Deliverable(s) are as follows for each of the three (3) phases: • The database shall be the property of the City of El Segundo when each phase of the ADA Transition Plan is complete. Electronic datafiles shall be submitted to the City utilizing the City -approved software. Page 18 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUMMARY OF DELIVERABLES RFP NO. ENG 21-13 The following list includes, but is not limited to, all anticipated deliverables upon project completion: 1. Self -Evaluation process recommendations including proposed procedures and forms; 2. Draft Barrier Assessment Surveys for all City buildings, public rights -of -way, parks and open spaces, subject to the requirements of the ADA, in hard -copy and electronic formats; 3. Final Barrier Assessment Surveys for all City buildings not already addressed in previous ADA assessments, public rights -of -way, parks and open spaces, subject to the requirements of the ADA, in hard -copy and electronic formats; 4. Draft Access Compliance Assessment Reports for all City buildings, public rights -of -way, parks and open spaces subject to the requirements of the ADA, in hard -copy and electronic formats; 5. Final Access Compliance Assessment Reports for all City buildings, public rights -of -way, parks and open spaces subject to the requirements of the ADA, in hard -copy and electronic formats; 6. Draft Self -Evaluation Report submitted in hard -copy and electronic formats; 7. Final Self -Evaluation Report submitted in hard -copy and electronic formats; 8. Public meeting agendas and minutes, as appropriate; 9. Draft "Self -Evaluation Report and ADA Transition Plan" submitted in hard -copy and electronic formats; 10. Final "Self -Evaluation Report and ADA Transition Plan" submitted in hard -copy and electronic formats; 11. CONSULTANT plan for at least two meetings, at the request of City staff, to present the "Self -Evaluation Report and ADA Transition Plan" for review and adoption; and 12. Project meetings with City staff as needed. The City shall have the authority to prioritize projects on the final Transition Plan based on which sites receive the most foot traffic. SECTION 4: PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS The proposal shall be prepared in no smaller than 11-point font and not exceed 30 pages (15 double -sided) in length. Covers, dividers, table of contents, cover letter, resumes (no more than two pages for each team member) are not included in the page count. The following shall be included in the proposal: Cover Letter. Include a statement that consultant is agreeable to execute the attached City -CONSULTANT Professional Services Agreement, to provide proof of insurance as noted in the agreement and to obtain and maintain a City Business License for the duration of the consultant services. A summary of the insurance requirements is also included herein. (Refer to Appendix A, Professional Service Agreement for further details). The Cover Letter shall include a statement indicating that the proposed Project Manager is available and fully committed to this effort for the entire duration of service delivery. In addition, it shall contain a statement to the effect that it is valid for a period of ninety (90) calendar days from the date of receipt thereof by the City. It shall be signed by an official authorized to bind the organization. Page 19 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 2. Table of Contents. List major sections in the proposal and associated page numbers. Executive Summary. Provide a brief summary of the proposal and a description of the credentials to deliver the services. Firm Qualifications. Demonstrate the firm's experience providing local jurisdictions with ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plans. Highlight experience in developing similar plans for other similar government agencies and municipalities. Indicate any specialized expertise relevant to the project and discuss the CONSULTANT's in-house capabilities and commitment to delivering the project in a timely manner. CONSULTANT's qualifications and experience within the last five (5) years as the prime consultant of record successfully completing a minimum of three (3) projects of a similar nature and scope, with names and current email addresses and telephone numbers of references that can be contacted. 5. Staff Qualifications. Provide an introduction to your proposed team and an organization chart, including sub -consultants as applicable. The CONSULTANT must have sufficient staff and/or sub -consultants available with experience in the disciplines required for this service. Include resumes for the proposed Project Manager (PM) and any supporting staff that demonstrate a record of successfully completing similar projects over the past 10 years, including reference contact information for the individual who can speak to the performance of the PM and your proposed team members. A statement committing the Project Manager and Lead Designer to the entire project from start-up to completion shall be provided, noting current workload and availability. The City must approve any changes to the PM or key personnel provided in this proposal subsequent to contract award. 6. The CONSULTANT's staff and/or sub -consultants performing assessments as outlined in Section 3 must have a CASp certification. 7. Issues and Challenges. Describe issues and challenges you see as unique to this project, and how the proposed PM addressed and resolved similar challenges while providing services to the agencies in the reference projects noted in previous sections. 8. Understanding and Approach. Describe your understanding of what is required and your proposed technical and management approach. Expand upon the scope of work, if appropriate, to accomplish the overall objectives, and provide suggestions that may enhance the project. Provide a proposed schedule for delivering the required services. 9. Estimated Labor Hours. Provide a table with the estimated labor hours by personnel proposed for the project for each task identified in the Scope of Services. The table shall include subtotals by both column and row along with a total estimated hours to perform the Scope of Services. All pertinent and relevant assumptions that may affect the proposed hours shall be clearly listed in this section of the proposal. 10. Cost Proposal. In addition to providing costs for all sections and sub -tasks, the cost proposal should reflect three (3) separate phases, (A) Public Buildings, (B) Public Page 20 of 21 Agreement No. 6214 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. ENG 21-13 Right -of -Way, and (C) Parks and Open Space, for Section 3 Task 3, 6, 8A, and 8B as noted in the Statement of Work above. The Cost Proposal should also state an alternative cost for annually updating the ADA Transition Plan for a period of two years. While this is a qualifications -based proposal, there is a finite amount of funding available for the requested services; therefore, cost competitiveness will be a factor in selection. Include a task -based cost proposal including raw and loaded rates of key staff. Provide the lead firm's proposed overhead and fees. Other Direct Costs such as mileage, incidentals and reproduction costs shall be considered as part of the rates. Please submit one (1) copy of the Cost Proposal in a separate sealed envelope marked "AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN — Cost Proposal". Do not include an electronic copy of the Cost Proposal in your submittal package, nor email it to City Staff. SECTION 5: SELECTION PROCESS City staff will conduct the qualifications -based review of all received proposals, and then factor in the fee to produce a ranking list. Proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria: • Responsiveness and completeness of the proposal (10%). • CONSULTANT team qualifications and overall experience (30%). • Issues and challenges (20%). • Understanding and Approach (30%) • Results of reference checks (10%). • Cost Proposal. Firms will be ranked based upon qualifications and receive a score out of the 100 available points. Then the cost proposals will be opened for the top ranked firms (the City reserves the right to open as many as desired and return other lower -ranked firms' cost proposals unopened) to check if they are complied with market price or otherwise reasonable. The City reserves the right to negotiate with the CONSULTANT if the City feels the rates are above market price or the cost proposal contains unreasonably high cost items. The top -rated consultants may be requested to interview with several members of City staff, who will make the final selection for recommendation to the City Council. Oral interviews, if held, will be scheduled in September 2021. ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE Solicitation issued Optional pre -proposal Zoom meeting Deadline for receipt of questions City response to questions Proposal due date Anticipated award date Required completion date City Council presentation/adoption Page 21 of 21 Thursday, July 22, 2021 Wednesday, August 11, 2021 Friday, August 13, 2021 Tuesday, August 17, 2021 Tuesday, August 31, 2021 Tuesday, October 5, 2021 Monday, April 18, 2022 Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Agreement No. 6214 APPENDIX A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN SERVICES —CONTRACT TEMPLATE Agreement No. 6214 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND This AGREEMENT is entered into this_ day of , 2019, by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation and general law city ("CITY") and a corporation ("CONSULTANT"). The parties agree as follows: 1. CONSIDERATION. A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, below; B, As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement; C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a sum not to exceed for CONSULTANT's services. CITY may modify this amount as set forth below. Unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement, CITY will pay this sum as specified in the attached Exhibit 'A" which is incorporated by reference. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. A. CONSULTANT will perform services listed in the attached Exhibit "A," which is incorporated by reference. B. CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space and facilities, and all tests, testing and analyses, calculation, and all other means whatsoever, except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement. 3. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. While performing this Agreement, CONSULTANT will use the appropriate generally accepted professional standards of practice existing at the time of performance utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services. CITY will continuously monitor CONSULTANT's services. CITY will notify CONSULTANT of any deficiencies and CONSULTANT will have fifteen (15) days after such notification to cure any shortcomings to CITY's satisfaction. Costs associated with curing the deficiencies will be borne by CONSULTANT. 4. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit a detailed invoice to CITY which lists the hours worked and hourly rates for each personnel category and reimbursable costs (all as set forth in Exhibit "A") the City of El Segundo PSA for Design Services Page 1 Agreement No. 6214 tasks performed, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period, the cumulative percentage completed for each task, the total cost of that work during the preceding billing month and a cumulative cash flow curve showing projected and actual expenditures versus time to date. 5. NON -APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments due and payable to CONSULTANT for current services are within the current budget and within an available, unexhausted and unencumbered appropriation of the CITY. In the event the CITY has not appropriated sufficient funds for payment of CONSULTANT services beyond the current fiscal year, this Agreement will cover only those costs incurred up to the conclusion of the current fiscal year. 6. ADDITIONAL WORK. N/A. 7. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT agrees that it has: A. Carefully investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; B. Carefully considered how the services should be performed; and C. Understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If services involve work upon any site, CONSULTANT agrees that CONSULTANT has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, before commencing the services hereunder. Should CONSULTANT discover any latent or unknown conditions that may materially affect the performance of the services, CONSULTANT will immediately inform CITY of such fact and will not proceed except at CONSULTANT's own risk until written instructions are received from CITY. 8. TERM. The term of this Agreement will be from to for years from 1, unless otherwise terminated pursuant to Section 15. 9. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. A. CONSULTANT will not perform any work under this Agreement until: [or CONSULTANT furnishes proof of insurance as required under Section 23 of this Agreement; and CITY gives CONSULTANT a written notice to proceed. B. Should CONSULTANT begin work on any phase in advance of receiving written authorization to proceed, any such professional services are at CONSULTANT's own risk. 10. CONSISTENCY. In interpreting this Agreement and resolving any ambiguities, the main body of this Agreement takes precedence over the attached Exhibits; this Agreement supersedes any conflicting provisions. Any inconsistency between the Exhibits will be resolved in the order in which the Exhibits appear below: A. Exhibit A: Quote. City of EI Segundo PSA for Design Services Page 2 Agreement No. 6214 B. Exhibit B: 11. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties. 12. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 13. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT, at its sole expense, will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. 14. WAIVER. CITY's review or acceptance of, or payment for, work product prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement will not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights CITY may have under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising from CONSULTANT's performance. A waiver by CITY of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement will not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement, whether of the same or different character. 15. TERMINATION. A, Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. B. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement at any time upon thirty days' written notice. C. Upon receiving a termination notice, CONSULTANT will immediately cease performance under this Agreement unless otherwise provided in the termination notice. Except as otherwise provided in the termination notice, any additional work performed by CONSULTANT after receiving a termination notice will be performed at CONSULTANT's own cost; CITY will not be obligated to compensate CONSULTANT for such work. D. Should termination occur, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT will, at CITY's option, become CITY's property, and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination, not to exceed the total costs under Section 1(C). E. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated. F. By executing this document, CONSULTANT waives any and all claims for damages that might otherwise arise from C ITY's termination under this Section. City of EI Segundo PSA for Design Services Page 3 Agreement No. 6214 16. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement are CITY's property. CONSULTANT may retain copies of said documents and materials as desired but will deliver all original materials to CITY upon CITY's written notice. CITY agrees that use of CONSULTANT's completed work product, for purposes other than identified in this Agreement, or use of incomplete work product, is at CITY's own risk. 17. PUBLICATION OF DOCUMENTS. Except as necessary for performance of service under this Agreement, no copies, sketches, or graphs of materials, including graphic art work, prepared pursuant to this Agreement, will be released by CONSULTANT to any other person or public CITY without CITY's prior written approval. All press releases, including graphic display information to be published in newspapers or magazines, will be approved and distributed solely by CITY, unless otherwise provided by written agreement between the parties. 18. INDEMNIFICATION. This Agreement contemplates that CONSULTANT will act both as a design professional (as defined by Civil Code § 2782.8) and for other management services. Accordingly, CONSULTANT agreesto provide indemnification as follows: A. CONSULTANT must save harmless, indemnify and defend CITY and all its officers, employees and representatives from and against any and all suits, actions, or claims, of any character whatever, brought for, or on account of, any injuries or damages sustained by any person or property arising from, pertaining to, or relating to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT's officers, agents, employees, or representatives. CONSULTANT's duty to defend consists of reimbursement of defense costs incurred by CITY in direct proportion to the CONSULTANT's proportionate percentage of fault. CONSULTANT's percentage of fault will be determined, as applicable, by a court of law, jury or arbitrator. In the event any loss, liability or damage is incurred by way of settlement or resolution without a court, jury or arbitrator having made a determination of the CONSULTANT's percentage of fault, the parties agree to mediation to determine the CONSULTANT's proportionate percentage of fault for purposes of determining the amount of indemnity and defense cost reimbursement owed to the CITY; CONSULTANT and CITY must each pay half the mediator's fees. Notwithstanding the above, in the event one or more defendants to a Claim is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, the CONSULTANT must meet and confer with the CITY regarding unpaid defense costs. B, Defense For All Non -Design Professional Liabilities. Notwithstanding the foregoing and without diminishing any rights of the CITY under subsection A, for any liability, claim, demand, allegation against CITY arising out of, related to, or pertaining to any act or omission of CONSULTANT, but which is not a design professional service, CONSULTANT must defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Indemnitees from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and expert witness fees), judgments, settlements, and/or arbitration awards, whether for personal or bodily injury, property damage, or economic injury, to the extent that they arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the CONSULTANT. C. For purposes of this section "CITY" includes CITY's officers, officials, employees, City of El Segundo PSA for Design Services Page 4 Agreement No. 6214 agents, representatives, and certified volunteers. D, It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement. The insurance coverage to be maintained by CONSULTANT as required by Section 23, will not limit the liability of CONSULTANT hereunder. The provisions of this section will survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. 19. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT's professional services. CONSULTANT's attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY's written approval are prohibited and will be null and void. 20. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agreethat CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which it is performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only. 21. AUDIT OF RECORDS. CONSULTANT will maintain full and accurate records with respect to all services and matters covered under this Agreement. CITY will have free access at all reasonable times to such records, and the right to examine and audit the same and to make transcript therefrom, and to inspect all program data, documents, proceedings and activities. CONSULTANT will retain such financial and program service records for at least three (3) years after termination or final payment under this Agreement. 22. INSURANCE, A. Before commencing performance under this Agreement, and at all other times this Agreement is effective, CONSULTANT will procure and maintain the following types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum, with the limits set forth below: !Kntof Insurance Commercial general liability: Professional Liability Business automobile liability Workers compensation Limits $2, 000, 000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Statutory requirement B. Commercial general liability insurance will meet or exceed the requirements of ISO-CGL Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88, or equivalent. The amount of insurance set forth above will be a combined single limit per occurrence for bodily City of El Segundo PSA for Design Services Page 5 Agreement No. 6214 injury, personal injury, and property damage for the policy coverage. Liability policies will be endorsed to name CITY, its officials, and employees as "additional insureds" under said insurance coverage and to state that such insurance will be deemed "primary" such that any other insurance that may be carried by CITY will be excess thereto. CITY's additional insured status will apply with respect to liability and defense of suits arising out of CONSULTANT's acts or omissions. Such insurance will be on an "occurrence," not a "claims made," basis and will not be cancelable or subject to reduction except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY. C. Professional liability coverage will be on an "occurrence basis" if such coverage is available, or on a "claims made" basis if not available. When coverage is provided on a "claims made basis," CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect. D. Automobile coverage will be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01 06 92, including symbol 1 (Any Auto). E, CONSULTANT will furnish to CITY valid Certificates of Insurance evidencing maintenance of the insurance required under this Agreement, a copy of an Additional Insured endorsement confirming CITY has been given Insured status under the CONSULTANT's General Liability policy, and such other evidence of insurance or copies of policies as may be reasonably required by CITY from time to time. Insurance must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best Company Rating equivalent to at least a Rating of "A:VII." F. Should CONSULTANT, for any reason, fail to obtain and maintain the insurance required by this Agreement, CITY may obtain such coverage at CONSULTANT's expense and deduct the cost of such insurance from payments due to CONSULTANT underthis Agreement or terminate pursuant to Section 15. 23. USE OF SUBCONTRACTORS. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY's prior written approval to use any consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must approve of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation. 24. INCIDENTAL TASKS. CONSULTANT will meet with CITY monthly to provide the status on the project, which will include a schedule update and a short narrative description of progress during the past month for each major task, a description of the work remaining and a description of the work to be done before the next schedule update. 25. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows: If to CONSULTANT: If to CITY: Address City of El Segundo City of EI Segundo PSA for Design Services Page 6 Agreement No. 6214 Address 350 Main Street Phone El Segundo, Calif. 90245 Attention: Name Attention: Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. 26. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONSULTANT will comply with all conflict of interest laws and regulations including, without limitation, CITY's conflict of interest regulations. 27. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability. 28. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT's or CITY's obligations under this Agreement. 29. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County. 30. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. CONSULTANT agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws applicable to this Agreement. 31. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Exhibits, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. There are Exhibits to this Agreement. This Agreement will bind and inure to the benefit of the parties to this Agreement and any subsequent successors and assigns. 32. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party. 33. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and, as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect. 34. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to City of El Segundo PSA for Design Services Page 7 Agreement No. 6214 engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement maybe modified by written amendment. CITY's executive manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY. 35. ACCEPTANCE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Agreement, agreements ancillary to this Agreement, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by electronic (.pdf) or facsimile transmission. Such electronic or facsimile signature will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. 36. CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and will not affect the interpretation of this Agreement. 37. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 38. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be prevented due to fire, flood, explosion, acts of terrorism, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties' reasonable control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other. 39. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public CITY. [Signatures on next page] City of El Segundo PSA for Design Services Page 8 Agreement No. 6214 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO NAME Greg Carpenter, City Manager ATTEST: Tracy Weaver, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney Insurance Approved by: City of EI Segundo PSA for Design Services Page 9 By: Its: By: Its: Taxpayer ID No. Agreement No. 6214 APPENDIX B EL SEGUNDO FACILITY LIST Agreement No. 6214 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FACILITY LIST CIVIC CENTER AREA YEAR BUILT OR ADDRESS (S.F.) CONSTRUCTION REMODELED City Hall Masonry Civic Center ConstructioNWood 350 Main Street 29700 Roof 1977 Police Station Civic Center 1978 348 Main Street 26466 Mansory Construction 2000 Dispatch Center Civic Center 1978 348 Main Street 4980 Mansory Construction 2000 Fire Station 1 (FS 1) Masonry Civic Center Construction/Wood 314 Main Street 8539 Roof 1961 Handball Court east of FS 1 Masonry Civic Center Construction/Wood 314 Main Street 1070 Roof 1967 Hose Tower east of FS 1 Masonry Civic Center Construction/Wood 314 Main Street 105 Roof 1978 Gym east of FS 1 Masonry Civic Center Construction/Wood 314 Main Street 726 Roof 1958 Agreement No. 6214 MAINTENANCE FACILITIES AREA YEAR BUILT OR ADDRESS (S.F.) CONSTRUCTION REMODELED Administration Masonry City Maintenance Facility Construction/Wood 150 Illinois St. 5214 Roof 1983 Maintenance Storage Masonry City Maintenance Facility Construction/Wood 150 Illinois St. 17170 Roof 1983 Vehicle Storage Masonry City Maintenance Facility Construction/Wood 150 Illinois St. 8814 Roof 1983 Warehouse Storage Masonry City Maintenance Facility Construction/Wood 150 Illinois St. 4320 Roof 1983 Office and Maintenance Masonry Water Division Complex Construction/Wood 400 Lomita 5476 Roof 1966 Cable Building Masonry Water Division Complex Construction/Wood 400 Lomita 836 Roof 1979 Pumphouse B Water Division Complex 400 Lomita 2155 All Combustible 1947 Pumphouse B Masonry Water Division Complex Construction/Wood 400 Lomita 1058 Roof 1976 Storage Plant Masonry Water Division Complex Construction/Wood 2151 E. El Segundo Blvd. 1066 Roof 1984 Pump Station #16 Storm, Sewer, Pumping Masonry Station 408 Construction/Wood Eucalyptus 950 Roof 2004 Pump Station #17 Storm, Sewer, Pumping Masonry Station 1015 E, Construction/Wood Imperial Ave. 700 Roof 1964 Storm Drain Plant #18 Storm, Sewer, Pumping Masonry Station 2050 Hughes Construction/Wood Way 1847 Roof 1984 Agreement No. 6214 RECREATION PARK FACILITIES AREA YEAR BUILT OR ADDRESS (S.F.) CONSTRUCTION REMODELED Checkout Building Recreation Park Main Masonry Complex 401 ConstructionMood 1980 Sheldon Street 3880 l Roof 2004 Clubhouse Recreation Park Main FManry Complex 300 E. truction/Wood 1957 Pine 11623 Roof 2005 Joslyn Center Recreation Park Main Masonry Complex Construction/Wood 339 Sheldon 7350 Roof 1966 Elevator Tower Recreation Park Main Complex 339 Sheldon 510 Block & Wood 1981 Park Electrical Distribution Room, Shop, Small Equipment, Garage, Restroom Recreation Park Main Complex 404 Sheldon 1245 Stucco & Wood 1970 Elevator Equipment Room, Office, Storage, Garage Recreation Park Main Complex 404 Sheldon 600 Stucco & Wood 1970 Racquetball Court Recreation Park Main Complex 404 Sheldon 1870 Concrete/Wood Roof 1978 Announcer's Booth Recreation Park Main Masonry Complex Construction/Wood Guaymas Way 110 Roof 1978 Concession Stand and Restrooms Recreation Park Main Masonry Complex Construction/Wood Guaymas Way 584 Roof 1978 Agreement No. 6214 RECREATION PARK FACILITIES (CONTINUED) AREA YEAR BUILT OR ADDRESS (S.F.) CONSTRUCTION REMODELED Baseball Concession Stand and Recreation Recreation Park Main Masonry Complex Construction/Wood Eucalyptus/HollyEucalyptus/Holly 960 Roof 1961 Softball Concession Stand and Restrooms Recreation Park Main Masonry Complex Construction/Wood Eucalyptus/Grand 640 Roof 1961 Teen Center 405 Grand Ave. 5518 1 Block/Wood Roof 1950 Agreement No. 6214 OTHER FACILITIES AREA YEAR BUILT OR ADDRESS (S.F.) CONSTRUCTION REMODELED Pool Restrooms Hilltop Park Masonry N/W Corner of Maryland and Construction/Wood Grand 760 Roof 1970 Restrooms Masonry Acacia Park Construction/Wood 600 Block W. Acacia 147 JRoof 1970 Library Masonry Library Park Construction/Wood 111 W. Mariposa 14686 Roof 1991 Library Annex Masonry Library Park Construction/Wood 111 W. Mariposa 15643 Roof 1991 Bandstand Masonry Library Park Construction/Wood 111 W. Mariposa 850 Roof 1976 Swim Stadium Masonry Urho Saari Swim Stadium Construction/Wood 219 W. Mariposa 6520 Roof 1940 Clubhouse Masonry Golf Course Construction/Wood 400 S. Sepulveda Blvd. 5200 Roof 1993 Mechanical and Electrical Masonry Golf Course Construction/Wood 400 S. Sepulveda Blvd. 250 Roof 1993 Maintenance Masonry Golf Course Construction/Wood 400 S. Sepulveda Blvd. 1740 Roof 1993 Ball Dispensing Masonry Golf Course Construction/Wood 400 S. Sepulveda Blvd. 400 Roof 1993 Girl Scout Building California St. 2000 Stucco & Wood 2005 97 Apartment Units Masonry Park Vista Construction/Wood 615 E. Holly Ave. 26500 Roof 1985 Fire Station #2 Masonry, Steel, & 2261 E. Mariposa Ave. 13959 Wood 2011 Concession Building Campus El Segundo Athletic Field 2201 E. Mariposa Ave. 1442 Wood Mason 2006 Agreement No. 6214 APPENDIX C EL SEGUNDO CITY PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT AND STREET LIST (PAGES 36-50) reement No. 6214 j +�►. .. I1 (Citywide) City of El Segundo, CA December 2, 2015 Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page i 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December 2, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary Il, Pavement Management Program -Capital Improvement Program A. Arterial -Collector Budget Scenario B. Local Budget Scenario C. Condition Distribution Report III. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Reports A. PCI Map B. A to Z Order C. PCI Order IV. Forecast Maintenance Report A. Arterial and Collector (2016-2021) B. Local (2016 — 2021) Im- Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December Z 2015 Table and Figure Reference Page # Figure 1— Pavement Area (SF) by Rank Sec 1-2 Figure 2 — PCI Distribution by Section Mileage for All Streets Sec 1-4 Figure 3 —Sample Pavement Life Cycle Sec 2-3 Figure 4 — Five Year Projection of Actual Budget Sec 2-7 Figure 5 — Five Year Projection of Recommended Budget (Reach PCI of 73) Sec 2-9 Figure 6 — PCI Calculation Worksheet Sec 2-16 Figure 7 —Arterial Condition Distribution Sec 2-17 Figure 8 — Local Condition Distribution Sec 2-17 Figure 9 — El Segundo Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Map Sec 3-4 Table 1— Condition Distribution by Section Mileage for All Streets Sec 1-3 Table 2 — Citywide Projection Utilizing "Actual" Budget Sec 1-7 Table 3 — Five -Year Projection Demonstrating Required Budget to Reach PCI of 73 Sec 1-7 Table 4 — PCI Range Sec 2-2 Table 5 — Maintenance Strategy Assignments Sec 2-2 Table 6—Citywide Projection Utilizing "Actual" Budget Sec 2-6 Table 7 — Five -Year Projection Demonstrating Required Budget to Reach PCI of 73 Sec 2-8 Acronym Listing Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Geographic Information System (GIS) Government Accounting Standards Board Statement 34 (GASB 34) High Density Mineral Bond (HDMB) Los Angeles County MTA (METRO) Maintenance and Repair (M&R) Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Pavement Management Program (PMP) Page ii im- Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 1 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December 2, 2015 Section 1 SECTION I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2015 UPDATE OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM This report reflects the continued dedication and proactive management of the City's Pavement Management Program (PMP); the last major update to the City's PMP was performed in 2012. As the City of El Segundo continues to show limited growth with its population, demographics, infrastructure and maintenance needs, the street network has been running parallel as the system matures and capital street projects widen streets. The City of El Segundo developed its PMP with the use of an automated database program. Today, the City is currently using the Army Corps of Engineers software, MicroPAVER, to manage the street network. This system is essential to the City in that it assists Public Works staff in capturing funding for its arterial street system as well as cost-effectively manages the local network through proactive maintenance and scheduling. Under this project, the City has incorporated the development of a unique Pavement Management — GIS layer that will assist the City in spatially analyzing pavement conditions and other attribute information that resides in the MicroPAVER database. The El Segundo PMS has been developed to assist City personnel by providing current data on the City's street network and to develop cost-effective maintenance strategies to maintain a desirable level of pavement performance on a network scale, while optimizing the expenditure of limited fiscal resources. City staff also provided key information pertaining to the ongoing maintenance that has occurred throughout the City since 2012. In doing this, we were tasked to generate an updated Capital Improvement Program report that identified recommendations and deficiencies in the current operating and maintenance efforts put forth by the City. For the 2015 project, our staff surveyed all arterial and collector routes to assist the City in complying with Los Angeles County MTA (METRO) PMP requirements and analyzed historical maintenance operations. Specifically, the program provides administrators and maintenance personnel with: • The present condition status of the pavement network (arterial, collector, and local streets), as a whole and of any grouping or individual component within the City; • A ranked list of all streets, or segments of streets, by condition within the network, • Rehabilitation/maintenance needs of each street segment by year, • An optimized priority maintenance and rehabilitation program based on cost/benefit analysis and various levels of funding; • Optimum annual budget levels for pavement maintenance for the current and the following five (5) years, - Prediction of the future performance of the City's pavement network and each individual street section; A Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 2 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section I • Updated PMS data to assist the City with GASB 34 compliance; and Pavement condition data and analysis presented in ArcGIS that is compatible with City's existing GIS Pavement is a dynamic structure where deterioration is constantly occurring; thus the pavement management program needs to be updated on a regular basis to reflect these changes in pavement conditions, pavement maintenance histories, and maintenance strategies based upon budgetary constraints. This report reflects the current state of the City's pavement network and recommended maintenance strategies for the next five (5) years. CITY'S PAVEMENT NETWORK Within the El Segundo pavement management network there are approximately 32.5 section miles of Arterial/Collector streets. The Arterial and Collector network consists of approximately 7,426,719 SF of pavement which consists of 132 pavement sections. The Local network consists of approx. 5,004,976 SF of pavement which consists of 164 pavement sections totaling in 29.3 section miles. Combined, the entire network consists of 61.8 section miles of streets. (Locals, S,004,976 40% Arteflallsn 7,426,71% The City's pavement network is broken down into manageable groups that have similar characteristics, such as pavement rank, surface type and logical segmentation. Pavement segments are identified by their branch and section numbers. Pavement "branches" that have a common usage, such as Mariposa Avenue, defines a "branch" within MicroPAVER. Pavement "sections" are pavement segments within the defined branch that have consistent pavement rankings, construction/maintenance histories and use. Representative inspection samples are then selected and visually surveyed to locate distress data. This data is used to calculate the pavement sections Pavement Condition Index (PCI) which includes distress type, extent of the distress and its severity. The PCI is a condition rating that ranges from 100 (a new pavement section or recently overlaid or reconstructed) to 0 for a section that has structurally failed and deteriorated dramatically. Weighted average PCI of a given area/zone = pavement section PCI * its own area divided by the total square footage of the given area/zone. Table 1 summarizes the section conditions found within the City of El Segundo pavement network by rank. The weighted average PCI for the City ofEl Segundo LOCAL network is 58.8 In Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 3 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section 1 The weighted PCI value associated with the Arterial and Local routes shown through our survey analysis is timely in that it is showing that a large amount of preventative, slurry seal, and overlay work will be needed over the next several years to increase the level of condition (PCI) to a "preventative maintenance" state. The City should strive to reach a citywide weighted PCI of 74. CURRENT CITYWIDE CONDITIONS (ARTERIALS AND LOCALS) The overall condition of the City's pavement network is "Fair" with a weighted average PCI of 65.7 based on the surface area of each segment. The distribution of the City's overall pavement network is shown in Section III of this report (Condition Distribution). For comparison, Bucknam performed 2015 pavement management studies for several other Los Angeles County agencies and have included their weighted PCI values; Hermosa Beach (73.1), Culver City (67.4), and Compton (58.8). "Ver° G o d (86-1 ) 10A 1-7 12-1 20 1 Good (75-85) 6-5 2.3 8.8 149 81 Fair (60-74) 5_0 11.7 16_7 %, ' Poor (41-59) 7-4 11.2 18-6 Vern Poor (41_ ,0) 3.2 2A 5.6 Table 1— Condition Distribution by Section Mileage for All Streets As shown above, a large majority of segments are distributed through Good to Poor condition categories (71%, approximately 44.1 miles). These findings indicate that large amount of overlay maintenance is still needed to be performed on the pavement network. These condition ranges are defined by the Army Corps of Engineers. Comparing the 2015 results to the 2012 study, a moderate increase occurs in sections entering the "Good" PCI range. This is inherently due to the proactive amount of slurry seal that has been placed on the Local network since 2012. However, it is important to note that the Poor and Very Poor PCI ranges still includes a similar amount of pavement sections since 2012; this is a clear indication that a high amount of Arterial and Local overlay is still needed. With 48% of the City's Arterial pavement sections within the condition levels of "Fair to Very Poor" (approximately 15.6 miles), a proactive overlay maintenance program needs to be implemented and funded; this will maintain the citywide weighted PCI at its current conditions and will gradually increase the PCI to a higher condition level while reducing maintenance costs in fiscal years 2016 and beyond. Local conditions show that 86% of the pavement network is within the condition levels of "Fair to Very Poor" (approximately 25.3 miles, this is a 1.9 mile increase since 2012). These sections should be considered for slurry seal and overlay maintenance. The City should continue to implement their Local zone maintenance approach; this will focus maintenance efforts, on an annual basis, within a small geographic area thus improving specific areas of the City over the next five years. However, moving forward it is highly recommended that additional funding be introduced to the Local Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 4 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December 2, 2015 Section I program to address the high amount of needed AC Overlay. In general, the Arterial network is showing higher condition levels compared to the Local network; there are several key overlay projects that should be proactively managed in the next few years of the Arterial & Local Streets CIP (These are recommended within Section IV of our report). These 2015 findings are met with some concern in that the amount of overlay revenue needed to maintain the network has not been available to the PMP for several years. This has become detrimental to the system as a whole due to the fact that the majority of street maintenance that has been recently performed included mostly preventative slurry seal projects. The recent Arterial overlay projects on Aviation Blvd and Maple Ave. have helped in the overall condition but more is needed. Therefore, cost efficient Arterial preventative maintenance and proactive use of available Measure R/Proposition C overlay funding should remain the focus of the Arterials for the next several years. The Local network needs to receive high amounts overlay maintenance in the short-term (FY 2016 thru 2018). PCI conditions reflect "surface" conditions; as large overlay and rehabilitation projects are considered for funding, the City should also consider using sub -grade R - Values, structural design, distress severities and extents as parameters for determining whether a pavement section that lies within the Fair to Very Poor condition range should be overlaid or reconstructed. Poor: 18.6: 30% Very Poor. 5.6m 9 Very Good; 12. 1; Very Gad W Good QFaii, Poor M leery Po011" Figure 2 — PCI Distribution by Section Milea a for All Streets ME i us Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 5 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section 1 MAINTENANCE STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT Based on the results of the condition survey and input from the City, pavement maintenance/rehabilitation strategies were developed. At the outset, the City and Bucknam staff identified a distribution of City maintenance funds that would be applied to the network over the next five years. This was based upon the desire to prevent the decrease in street conditions and not allow an increase in the maintenance backlog funds over the five/seven-year program. With this approach, Bucknam has recommended a "minimal level of service" which creates a major dividing line in determining pavement maintenance. Generally within pavement management programs, a PCI range between 55 to 70 determines the threshold of when preventative or major overlay maintenance is activated. Based on the City's weighted average PCI, condition distribution, maintenance practices, our team has identified a PCI of "65" as the minimum level of service. This means that any pavement section with a PCI greater than 65 will be recommended for preventative maintenance. This recommendation is indicated in Table 5, Section II. Bucknam developed a multi -year Capital Improvement Program for the City based on the pavement records, yearly capital expenditures and the most recent 2015 inspections. These recommendations and results are shown in Section II of this report where we have demonstrated what level of funding is necessary to improve the current weighted condition level of 65.7 to a level of 73 by FY 2021. As shown in Figure 2, 34% of the City's streets are in Very Good to Good condition. These sections will be targeted for "preventive" maintenance within our Capital Improvement Program (CIP) recommendations. The reasoning in doing this is to extend the life cycles of those "good" pavement sections which accrues capital saving to aggressively rehabilitate those pavement sections that are below the "minimal level of service". In order to achieve the most effective and optimum program for the City, certain strategies have been selected and/or analyzed. Below is a listing of the maintenance activities utilized in strategy development. Each activity is representative of the types of work that have been programmed as part of the long-term maintenance requirements of the City's street network. For this maintenance type, small localized surface treatments are utilized as "holding action" solutions (stop gaps) to delay the need for pavement structural strengthening. They typically include activities such as crack sealing, deep patching, skin patching, grinding and leveling. Slurry Seals Global Maintenance* for PCI range — 60 to 85 Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo 2015 Pavement Management Program Page 6 Final Report - December 2, 2015 Section I Overla s Major Maintenance* for PCI ran e — 20 to 60 AC Overlay — Placement of a layer of hot -mixed asphalt concrete over the existing pavement surface (may include pavement fabric). Grinding (milling) is performed prior to the overlay to reduce the total height of asphalt and assure alignment with existing gutter lines. This also includes "dig -outs" and crack sealing prior to the application of an overlay. This treatment provides a new wearing surface and increased structural strength to the pavement section. A conventional overlay should be designed for a ten-year life. Asphalt Rubber Hot -Mix Overla - The ASTM definition is: Asphalt -Rubber is a blend of asphalt cement, reclaimed tire rubber and certain additives in which the rubber component is at least 15% by weight of the total blend and has reacted in the hot asphalt cement sufficiently to cause swelling of the rubber particles. Specifically, using crumb rubber modified binders in pavement application benefit local agencies in that cities find: * Pavement resists cracking by being more flexible; * Cost savings come from a longer life cycle (from Bucknam's experience typically 20% longer), decreased maintenance and the use of less material o Improvement in skid resistance; * Decreased noise; and a It provides long-lasting color contrast for marking and striping Reconstruction M'a"or Maintenance* for PCI ran e — 0 to 2,0 Removal of the existing pavement section to a prescribed depth followed by the placement of a conventional flexible pavement section using a structural AC Hot Mix or AR Hot Mix or a full depth asphalt. Each classification of road has a typical design cross-section upon anticipation traffic loading. *Localized, Global and Major maintenance activities are default terms used within the MicroPAVER pavement software. Specific pavement repair applications are placed within each maintenance activity in order to develop multi -year maintenance forecast recommendations. Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December 2, 2015 ANNUAL BUDGET PROJECTIONS Page 7 Section 1 The budgeting process was approached with the following in mind; generate two unique work programs for the next five (5) years based upon actual road pavement conditions in order to: 1. Demonstrate how the City's current "Actual" budget allocation for pavement maintenance performs against the conditions found through our surveys 2. Identify the required citywide budget to reach a PCI level of 73 within five years Based on current and future pavement maintenance needs, two annual work programs have been prepared and summarized below. Table 2 demonstrates the citywide five-year, $745,000 per year work program. Table 3 demonstrates the required budget that is needed to improve the citywide weighted average PCI to a level of 73 within five years (each scenario addresses arterial and local streets). 201.6-17 653 67.2 5299 8-34 $441„155 $740,989 57,569,900 26217 18 65.9 $150,429 $616,727 5767,156 $7,005 900 2018-19 66.7 68.6 $429 379 $303„069 $732„448 56,658,500 2029-20 67.4 69.4 $403,393 $364,213 $767,606 $6„243 7'00 2020-21 68.4 70.5 $413,,150 $338„784 $751,934 $5,834,600 2016-17 65.7 68'.11 $299,834 5989.334 $1,289,168 7„569,9DO 2017-1.8 66.8 69.4 $150,429 $1„14.1„905 $1,292,334 $6,44„51 2018-19 68.4 70,7 $429„379 $845,277 $1,272,656 $5,270„500 2019-20 69.3 71.5 54 i3,393 $86^9.4'16 $1,272,809 54,210,400 2020-21 70.4 73 $44.9,815 $869„170 $1,318,985 $3„313,7DO . � a r • � . ,� , * •,, �y ire ' �' With the City currently funding the PMP at $745,000 annually and $3,725,000 over five year, these expenditures (shown within Table 2) demonstrate a proactive PCI result. However, it is key to point out that there is $1.6 million of slurry/cape seal and $5.9 million of overlay/reconstruction deferred maintenance currently reside on the network (based upon the City's maintenance practices and costs). The City should be planning for and proactively funding the necessary overlay maintenance to aggressively reduce the amount of needed overlay on the network. ist Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 8 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December 2, 2015 Section I Additional detail and breakdown of budget projections are demonstrated in Section IV of this report. All work program budgets generated are presented in terms of current 2015 dollars. All repair activities were based on distresses observed at the time of the field survey. These are recommendations and are to be used as "the best case scenario' for improving the City of El Segundo street network. QUALITY CONTROL EFFORTS As indicated in our scope of work, Bucknam performed numerous quality control checks in the field during survey efforts as well as specific site investigations requested by the City. Field check efforts were performed at the end of each week of survey. An assessment of the City's Master Plan of Arterial Highways was performed to ensure that all Arterial/Collectors were properly identified in the database as well as within this report. Corrections were made to a small amount of pavement sections regarding City ownership and section metrics. Additionally, several street sections were re-classified as private and not City maintained; these included: 0 Chapman Way, Continental Way, Elin Pointe and Hornet Way Sections along eastbound Imperial Highway (Sepulveda to Aviation) were classified as City owned; west bound sections were not included within the City's street network. Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo 2015 Pavement Management Program Page 9 Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section I FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Arterials The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Arterial street network is currently in "Fair" condition (PCI = 70.1). To maintain this condition, it is critical that preventive maintenance and overlay activities are funded at the levels identified in Table 3 to increase the network weighted average PCI value to the "Good" (PCI 75 or higher). Our arterial/collector findings for conditional data and recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown below: • The Arterial/Collector network has a weighted PCI of 70.1; + Currently, 33% of the arterial network (approx. 10.6 miles) qualify for overlay/reconstruction maintenance; • Arterial maintenance projects should focus on maintaining the current weighted PCI of 70.1 over the next five years; • Develop a proactive fiscal and planned approach to identify arterial overlay projects based on the deterioration modeling within MicroPAVER; Maintain arterial revenues at the levels shown within the Section IV Forecasted Maintenance Report for a minimum of five years to generate the results identified within this report; • Reassess/re-evaluate the arterial rehabilitation budget programs every two years to improve on CIP forecasts for 2016-17 and beyond to ensure the results shown in Table 2 or 3; • Perform pavement inspections on the arterial network every two years to build a solid planning model within MicroPAVER to track PCI deterioration; • Demonstrated budget shown in Table 2 is ample to improve upon the arterial weighted PCI of 70.1 through five years, additionally, the citywide deferred backlog decreases from a level of $7,500,000 to $5,800,000 after five years; and Bucknam recommends that the City proactively budget overlay/rehabilitation maintenance at the levels shown in Table 3 in order to improve upon the conditions found today as well as greatly reduce the amount of deferred maintenance across the City ($7.5 million to $3.3 million) o These Table 3 projects should include recommended Arterial sections such as Center St, El Segundo Blvd (East and West), Hughes Way, Grand Ave, Imperial Hwy, etc. -Im- Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 10 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section 1 Locals The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Local street network is currently in "Poor" condition (PCI = 58.8). To maintain this condition, it is critical that preventive maintenance and overlay activities are funded at the levels identified in Table 3 to increase the network weighted average PCI value to the "Good" (PCI 75 or higher). Our Local findings for conditional data and recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown below: • The Local network has a weighted PCI of 58.8; •, Currently, 68% of the Local network (approx. 19.8 miles) qualify for overlay/reconstruction maintenance; 28% qualify for slurry seal maintenance; At a minimum, Local maintenance projects should focus on increasing the current weighted PCI of 58.8 to a level of 70+ over the next five years; • Current Local Master Plan for maintenance should be followed as shown in Section IV reporting; Develop a proactive fiscal and planned approach to identify Local overlay projects based on the deterioration modeling within MicroPAVER; • Increase Local revenues at the levels shown within the Section IV Forecasted Maintenance Report for a minimum of five years to generate the results identified within this report; • Reassess/re-evaluate the Local rehabilitation budget programs every two years to improve on budget forecasts for 2016-17 and beyond to ensure the results shown in Table 3; • Perform pavement inspections on the Local network every three years to build a solid planning model within MicroPAVER to track PCI deterioration (1/3 of the City each year); and • Demonstrated budget shown in Tables 2 is ample enough to increase the Local weighted PCI; proactive overlay funding needs to be implemented to see these results. additionally, the citywide deferred backlog decreases from a level of $7,500,000 to $5,800,000 after five years • Bucknam recommends that the City proactively budget overlay/rehabilitation maintenance at the levels shown in Table 3 in order to improve upon the conditions found today as well as greatly reduce the amount of deferred maintenance across the City ($7.5 million to $3.3 million) o These Table 3 projects should include recommended Local sections such as Alaska Ave, Coral Circle, Park Place, etc. im- Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo 2015 Pavement Management Program Page 1 Final Report - December 2, 2015 Section ll SECTION II PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Bucknom Infrastructure Group, Inc. (Bucknom) performed the following services in accordance with the scope of services that was contracted with the City of El Segundo. As a quick overview, the following tasks were performed to complete the work over the past several months: 2015 Pavement Management Work Efforts: Task 1: Project Kickoff -Data Management Task 2: Update of Maintenance Activities Task 3: Pavement Condition Survey (approx. 61.8 miles) Task 4: Budgetary Analysis and Capital Improvement Reports Task 5: Executive Summary and Final CIP Reports Task 6: Mapping of the Pavement Network Pavement Management Program Update 2015 As a part of the 2015 update of the pavement management program, a major element of work was to complete a comprehensive assessment of the existing street network and PMS database within the City. This included assessing the City's existing 2012 MicroPAVER dataset, GIS, street naming conventions and work history information. From there, Bucknam worked with the City to confirm public and private street listings which set the foundation for accurate CIP reporting. All data was then updated into the City's MicroPAVER database. Work history information was provided by the City in the form of completed bid documents, institutional knowledge, and previous dataset and Excel documents. This information was entered into the proper pavement segments that match the limits of those projects. From there, CIP pavement recommendations were performed (discussed and demonstrated below) where the pavement maintenance information the City provided (PMS material practices, unit costs, and capital budgets) were used to generate recommendations through the MicroPAVER system. Table 4 demonstrates PCI ranges defaulted within MicroPAVER. Once a pavement inspection is complete, a PCI is calculated for each pavement section. Each PCI calculated falls within a defined PCI range category (Excellent, Poor, etc.). Furthermore, a weighted PCI was calculated for each functional class within the network (arterials and locals). The PCI is a condition rating that ranges from 100 (a new pavement section or recently overlaid or reconstructed) to 0 for a section that has structurally failed and deteriorated dramatically. Weighted average PCI of a given area/zone = pavement section PCI multiplied by its own area divided by the total square footage of the given area/zone. This information can also be represented through MicroPAVER to show how much square footage or percentage of area falls within a PCI range category. lot Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 2 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December 2, 2015 Section 11 PCI RANGE CONDITION 86-100 Very Good 75-85 Good 60-74 Fair (f''f Segundo Network 2015 m ; 65.7" 41-59 Poor 0-40 Very Poor Table 4 - PCI Ranee These condition ranges are defined by the Army Corps of Engineers and defaulted within the MicroPAVER software. The summary of all roads condition data and their representative PCI's can be seen in the Pavement Condition Report in Section III. STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT TABLE The City was requested to provide a pavement maintenance list that demonstrated what pavement applications were currently being used and to provide their associated unit costs; from there a Maintenance Strategy Table was defined within the system that provided recommended actions to the specific repair needs of a street or a grouping of streets. Strategy Assignment Table PCI Range Description Unit Cost 2-f Preventative, Stop Gap, Patching Varies by Activii Varies by Activity SC t High Density.. Mineral Bond , , ..,,,.., .22/S ........ ...... -85....... .... m Type IIIII Slurry Seal $0.24/SF Ittl4ilrflirnal III' evell of SeiVii e (65) 40-60 Cape Seal � SF 2Gt-60 , ...... Y ., ..... 2" Grind & Overlay Local , $2.45/SF .. .......... ,, 2Gr ARH Overlay (Arterial) $3 45/SF ............ 20 ... .., .... AC Recon 4" % 6" CAB .. „ . ..,..., $7.13�'SF .......,., 0-2(�. 4" PCC Recon $9.4Gi4t5,F. Table 5 — Maintenance Strate2y Assignments The Strategy Assignments List, shown in Table 5, was developed to identify the most critical segments in each of the work programs (Arterial, Collector and Local). Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 3 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section 11 recommend maintenance, however, further assessment by City staff and/or outside parties can override maintenance recommendations. This can be done by reviewing and assessing distress extents and their weighted percentages. Once the strategy assignments were set within the system, budgets and work assignments were generated for each work program on an annual basis. Using pavement deterioration curves for each type of pavement surface and class of road, both current year and future years work requirements for each pavement segment within the City were determined. In forecasting the maintenance requirements in future years, the current PCI value is reduced annually for each pavement segment based on the MicroPAVER deterioration curves within the City's database. Likewise, maintenance activities performed in a given year increase the PCI value as they are applied to the segment. The overall program is dynamic in that each strategy consists of a cyclic series of actions that simulates the pavement anticipated life cycle. Strategy.Assi nme�s 1. Unit costs from the City's most recent construction bids were used; 2. 25% contingency costs were applied to pavement material costs; additional soft costs that were not included were: a. Right-of-way improvements b. Curb & gutter improvements c. ADA ramp improvement d. Utility improvement e. Design, construction management, inspection, testing f. Tree removals 3. Bucknam applied a 3% inflation rate on the annual budget within forecasted maintenance projections (Section IV) sdra.ro PCI raling saw 100 $.351SF For Wok Slurry here 86 U (Years) Fi lure 3 —'Sarn le Pavement Life Cycle (Typical Unit Costs shown Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 4 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section 11 MULTI -YEAR ANNUAL WORK PROGRAM PROJECTIONS The goal of these projections is to assist City policy makers in utilizing the recommendations of the MicroPAVER system. By using the City of El Segundo's current budgets and maintenance practices the system will develop "section unique" improvements and strategies. Each segment will be tied to a specific fiscal year. As shown in the following pages, we have assessed the budgets that have been projected to meet the maintenance and rehabilitations needed to maximize the City's return on investment. The budget forecasting goal for the City network focused on: Establishing a proactive multi -year Maintenance & Rehabilitation Program; Developing a preventive maintenance program; and .• Selecting the most cost-effective repairs based on City strategies ACTUAL BUDGET — The Actual budget was generated for the City to demonstrate how the limited $745k / yr budget allocation performs against the current citywide conditions. City's Actual budget includes: * 2016-17 - $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k * 2017-18 - $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k • 2018-19 - $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k * 2019-20 - $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k * 2020-21- $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k RECOMMENDED BUDGETS — A recommended budget was generated for the City to demonstrate the necessary funding that is required to increase the current weighted PCI level of 65.7 to 73 within five years. *All multi -year budget projections include a 3% inflation rate for the term of the budget forecast. Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 5 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December 2, 2015 Section 11 ARTERIAL -COLLECTOR / LOCAL BUDGET PROJECTIONS The annual projected revenues shown below only account for the cost of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation activities. A 25% contingency was applied to the pavement costs. Additional soft costs not included within the cost of pavement maintenance include: Right-of-way, curb & gutter, ADA ramp improvements; Utility improvements; Design, construction management, inspection, testing; Tree removals; i is Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 6 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section H ACTUAL — The first key step in developing a proactive PMP is to model the City's existing conditions against the "actual" annual budget. In doing this, PCI performance, deferred maintenance and pavement application uses are able to benchmark and demonstrate a positive or negative result. The City's existing $745,000 / yr budget was used for this model; the City provided Bucknam with current 2015 unit costs for pavement maintenance applications. City's Actual budget includes: • 2016-17 - $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k • 2017-18 - $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k p.. 2018-19 - $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k • 2019-20 - $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k 4 2020-21- $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k The resulting PCI conditions and maintenance distributions are shown below. ACTUAL BUDGET PROGRAM Actual Budget Program incorporates pavement sections that have a functional class of Arterial (A), Collector (C) and Locals (E). 2026-1 7 6.5.7 2017-116 65.9 2018-19 66.7 20 ,9-2D 67_4 20 0-2 1 69-4 67.2 $299,934 $441„255 $740989 $7.569900 69.0 _ $150,429 $6' 6,727' $,767,156 $7,.005,900 6 $429, 79 $ 03,069 $752,446 $6�658,500 69-4 $403,393 $564„213 $767,606 $6,243,700 70.5 $413, 50 $338,794 $75 l,934 $5a654,600 Table 6 — Citywide Projection Utilizing "Actual" Budget By modeling the existing pavement conditions against the City's available funding, we have found that two major results occur over the five year CIP; both positive. (See Figure 4 on the following page). First, due to the available annual funding, major overlay projects continued to be addressed. Performing overlays at the proper time resets the sections PCI to 100 and greatly extends the sections life -cycle. Secondly, the resulting deferred maintenance backlog shows that it decrease from $7.5 million to $5.8 million after the five years program which indicates that an annual $745,000 budget is ample enough to chip away at the deferred maintenance on the network. If the City were to reduce their annual funding to a level of $500k/yr major overlay projects would continue to be delayed thus increasing the overall deferred maintenance to levels such as $10 Million plus. Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 7 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section 11 As shown, this projection model does meet the initial goal of maintaining or increasing the City's pavement network PCI. With today's economic issues at the Federal, State and local levels, the City should continuously monitor the management of overlay deferred maintenance. Through Bucknam analysis of the previous pavement database, work history dates and our experience with AC Overlay deterioration rates, it is important to point out that pavement sections that were overlaid in the early part of the new century will need proper overlay maintenance approximately around fiscal year 2016-17 and beyond. Citywide Flve-Yr CI ' Projections (Actual Dui e S770, $750,000 $740CKDIO 730 yq 5720, 00 $ 71 1DQ nN, Fi ure 4 Five -Year Projection of Actual Budget The resulting "increase in weighted PCI" shown above for the entire network demonstrates how applying proper capital funds to the network is allowing the City's pavement to improve at a rate that is conducive to PMP success. Looking at the long-term projections., available funding or programmed funding identified by the City's PMP CIP, there may be an opportunity to proactively schedule or appropriate funds to areas of the City that have been annually deferred due to high maintenance costs. Additionally, the City should continue to implement local, stop gap maintenance (i.e. deep patching, crack sealing, etc.) prior to any major slurry seal or overlay maintenance. By performing stop gap measures to individual pavement sections the overall performance of the sections condition will increase and sustain itself longer than if no preventative maintenance was performed. im Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 8 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December 2, 2015 Section 11 RECOMMENDED PROGRAM (FIVE YEAR MODEL) With the City striving to show proactive maintenance across all City pavements, a recommended budget program was generated to show the greatest return on investment through the application of slurry seal, mill & cap, and alternative overlay maintenance. Our goal is to increase the network wide PCI level from 65.7 to 73 within five years. Bucknam worked with the City's Public Works staff to review previous methodologies and schedules applied by the City. The City provided information on the current work schedules and yearly goals for asphalt application. With this scenario, our initial goal is to provide the City with a budgetary outlook and conditional impact report that can be used to eventually create a solid, preventative maintenance program. Again, we used the "Actual" 5-yr PMP model (shown above) as a cornerstone for our modeling within the recommended program. Combining the previous reporting model with a realistic and achievable annual budget, we found positive results. The Recommended Program incorporates pavement sections that have a functional class of Arterial (A), Collector (C) and Local (E). 20116-17 65.7 69.1 $299,834 $989,334 $1,289„368 $7„569„900 017-118 66.9 69.4 $1.50,479 $1,141903 $1„29 „334 $6,344„500 3018-19 68_4 70.7 $479„379 $843,277 $1,r272,656 $5, 70,300 3019-0 69.3 7_5 $403393 5869,416 $1,372„809 $4,21d00 3 70-:7t 70.4 73.0 $4 9„815 $869„170 $1,318,985 $3,313,700 Referring to Table 7, it is noted that the weighted PCI increases at a consistent pace throughout the five- year projection. Furthermore, the annual deferred maintenance total decreases from $7.5 million to $3.3 million after five -years if the City utilizes an annual average of $1,289,000/yrfor slurry, overlay, and reconstruction maintenance. We found average square footage breakdowns (zone maintenance) were consistent and well balanced; combined with the positive results found with the weighted PCI and deferred maintenance we recommended that this 5-yr maintenance schedule be followed. We recommend that a stronger focus be placed on the Local network improvements within the first three years due to the fact that the Local network has a worse weighted PCI than the arterials. We still recommend comprehensive maintenance to the arterial network, i.e. localized patching, slurry seal and the use of Measure R / Proposition C funds. But again, with the Local network showing a higher degree of negative results, a focus for zone area maintenance and proactive overlays should be continued. Im- Agreement No. 6214 Page 9 Section 11 Citywide IH e-.� ''r CI11) IPirojection ('Increase PCIBudget) City of El Segundo 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 ;f 4.51'r TLC 51,,,31. ,000 $ I , 5 IRD,ClulO0 $1,2,9ff ,,DD0 S1,2EXIi,X)0 51,25rd 01DO S71.,,' ,'SabDO Comparing this budget scenario to the "actual' five-year model, the major variance between the two models is the annual average revenue increase within the "recommended" model. The pavement network will require $537,000 more each year to obtain even higher weighted PCI results and a proactive decrease in overall deferred maintenance. As mentioned above, a local slurry/overlay maintenance "area" strategy should be established for several reasons. With the City applying a maintenance area methodology to the local network, four beneficial impacts occur: 1) Planned / Maintenance areas are addressed every five years which creates a dedicated project schedule for City staff and constituent inquiries; 2) Deferred overlay maintenance can be addressed in a more effective manner due to accrued revenues 3) A preventative maintenance strategy is more cost-effective in a long-term PMP rather than implementing a maintenance approach that addresses only the "worst -first" streets. 4) All maintenance alternatives are available due to the increased funding and focused maintenance within one zone per year. Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 10 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December 2, 2015 Section 11 The Local maintenance model that has been developed under the Recommended budget can be used as a benchmark to monitor the City's annual budget allocations as the network continues to mature and age; the proper amount of funding for slurry seal and overlay maintenance needs to be the City's highest priority. Additionally, it is recommended that the City continue to monitor the application of Mill & Cap, Cape Seal and High Density Mineral Bond (HDMB) as an asphalt application alternatives for the specific local sections. Specific sections are now qualifying for maintenance that warrants a stronger application rather than a typical slurry seal. With a five year cycle in motion, it is essential to address local sections that have PCI's less than 65 with the proper maintenance since crews will not be back within that area for five to six years. DEFERRED MAINTENANCE Delaying repairs on streets where pavement condition indicates a need creates deferred maintenance. Deferred maintenance includes pavement maintenance / rehabilitation that is needed across the entire network, but cannot be performed due to the lack of available funding and is pushed to the next budget cycle. The actual repairs that are being deferred are often referred to as a "backlog". As maintenance is deferred, the opportunity to apply life extending preventive pavement applications is lost and the ultimate cost of rehabilitation multiples. I'm Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 11 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December Z 2015 Section 11 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORTS In addition to the annual budget scenario, this report contains a comprehensive and complementary assemblage of pavement management reports ranging from summary reports to annual maintenance and rehabilitation schedules (Forecasted Maintenance Report, Section IV). Collectively as well as individually, the reports represent reasonable projections of pavement maintenance needs and performance based on visual condition assessments, unit cost estimates, and pavement deterioration models. It is important to note that pavement segment dimensions and surface area recorded during 1999-2009, 2012 and 2105 inspections, along with the action and repair costs, as presented within the reports are accurate within tolerable limits. This is noteworthy due to the "implied" accuracy of reporting length and width to the nearest foot, surface area to the nearest square foot, and action and repair unit costs and project estimates to the nearest penny and dollar, respectively. NEXT STEPS As with any infrastructure management software program, time investments need to be made by key Public Works staff to maintain the integrity of the data as well as the accuracy. Bucknam can perform training sessions in the use of the MicroPAVER system and demonstrate how to generate standard maintenance reports to assist City staff in developing yearly budgets, project level analysis, and CIP projections. This will be key to future staff management of the pavement program and reporting. City personnel need to maintain their commitment to the preventive maintenance system, while working toward reducing the City's present backlog of rehabilitation projects. In order to ensure that report outputs are accurate and credible, it is essential that the integrity of all data files be maintained. This will require performing all necessary updates when changes are made to scheduling scenarios, unit cost information, historical data, etc. In addition, the entire pavement network will have to be re -inventoried at regular intervals. This typically includes surveying arterial and collectors every two years and locals every three. One recommendation the City may consider to keep the program "managed" is: • Survey half the arterials each year; and • One-third of the locals each year This will not only allow work to be scheduled based on the most current condition data available, but will provide City personnel with a means to monitor actual rates of pavement deterioration so appropriate modifications can be made to the system curves. To be compliant with the MTA requirements, the City must generate a triennial Arterial and Collector network pavement management report indicating condition ratings. Bucknam will be supporting the City with staff level support to assist in the continuous updates with the MicroPAVER system. This will include work history updates, generating reports from the system, unit cost updates, and future inspections. im- Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 12 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section 11 ALTERNATIVE PMP FINANCING OPTIONS Through Bucknam experience with PMP financing and maintenance forecasting, we have been involved with numerous PMP projects that include alternative funding. We have included below several examples and alternatives to PMP funding: Grants - State funding for alternative asphalt applications (i.e. Rubber Asphalt Concrete through the Cal Recycle Grant Program) htt www.calre cle.ca. 'ov Tires Grants default.htm#RAC • Bond Measures - Bonds may be issued to fund the amount of the unpaid assessments. The bonds are secured by a pledge of the assessment installments. The amount of bonds issued equals the amount of the unpaid assessment plus additional bond issuance costs and establishment of a reserve. If the City Council determines that it is not convenient to collect the amount assessed in a single year, then the amount of the proposed assessment may be collected in installments over a period of years. Property owners are given an opportunity to pay all or a portion of the amount assessed. • General and/or Special Assessments — Through our experience, we have seen several local agencies perform Special Assessment Feasibility studies and eventually form Special Assessment Districts for the purpose of funding pavement improvements beyond the annual allocated City funding. The purpose of a feasibility study for the formation of an assessment district within the City would provide insight as to how an assessment district would be formed within the City's boundaries. The analysis utilizes a common approach by comparing average daily trip miles among the different land uses and the average units per acre to obtain EDU rates. The EDU rates are then multiplied by the parcel's individual number of units or acres to establish the parcel's assessment amount. The City's possible options in forming the street maintenance assessment district are set forth below. These options can be implemented in combination; however, it is highly recommended that the City establish communication with affected property owners as early as possible, prior to the City moving forward with the initial proceedings of district formation. Conduct Outreach Efforts to Inform Property Owners It is recommended that the City hold informational sessions for affected property owners. Participation of residents in the process will build cooperation and trust and ensures the viability of the proposed assessment district. Input from residents is important in gaining understanding of the process and the reasons for levying the assessments. The City might also create a citizens' committee to disseminate information and express concerns to and from the residents and the City. Im- Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 13 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section 11 Public Opinion Survey In addition, it is recommended that a Public Opinion Survey be conducted to further gauge the resident's interest or desire to participate in being assessed for street and pavement rehabilitation. Response from the survey would also guide the City in determining whether a Citywide or Phased Assessment District is warranted. w Form Assessment Districts in Phases The City may time the initial formation of separate assessment districts with the street improvement schedule of each zone as opposed to a one-time formation of a citywide assessment district. A zone's start date for street improvements would trigger the assessment for parcels in that particular zone. If each zone improvements were separately initiated on an annual basis, the assessment for the twelfth zone will begin in the twelfth year. The City has the option to accelerate the improvement schedule of each zone. Through our review and assessment, several local agencies have successfully implemented Special Assessments for pavement improvements, see below: A. City of San Clemente The City of San Clemente's Citywide Street Improvement Program was adopted by City Council in July 1995 as Street Improvement Assessment District 95-1 (AD 95-1). The program was to restore approximately 60 miles (one-half) of the City's streets over a span of 18 years. The program was funded by a combination of various revenues from (1) Street Assessment District 95-1, which assesses all developed properties; (2) the General Fund; (3) the Gas Tax Fund. Water, sewer and storm drain funds pay for work done on underground facilities in conjunction with street work. The final assessment for AD 95-1 was collected in Fiscal Year 2010-11. In that year, only the maintenance portion of the assessment was collected (approximately $45 per parcel), which was one-half the normal assessment amount. The final bond redemption, paid in September 2011, was paid for by the mandatory reserve funds held since the bonds were issued. AD 95-1 is expired and fully paid. B. City of Elk Grove Beginning with Zone No. 1 in 2003, the City of Elk Grove formed Street Maintenance Assessment District No. 1. The City of Elk Grove's Street Maintenance District No. 1 funds street maintenance costs associated with local, collector and arterial streets. The assessment amounts for developed property are prepared by the City annually. The City levies an assessment according to the Engineer's Reports prepared for Zone Nos. 1 to 5. The assessment formula uses EDU factors to establish assessment amounts per unit or acre. Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December 2, 2015 C. City of La Habra Heights Page 14 Section 11 The City of La Habra Heights established the Citywide Street Maintenance Assessment District No. 4 in 2007. The City of La Habra Heights levied the assessments for five years. The first levy of assessments occurred in Fiscal Year 2007-08 and the final levy for District No. 4 was prepared for Fiscal Year 2011-12. im Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo 2015 Pavement Management Program Page 15 Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section 11 CONDITION DISTRIBUTION REPORT This report depicts the distribution of the pavement condition throughout the street network by area. The condition scheme ranges from "Very Good" to "Very Poor'; with a "Very Good" condition corresponding to a pavement at the beginning of its life cycle, and a "Very Poor" condition representing a badly deteriorated pavement with virtually no remaining life. The table below shows the general description for each pavement condition; Condition Descri tion —PCI Ran a -Descri tian Very Good (86-100) - Minor to low distress, no significant distress. Little distress, with the exception of utility patches in good condition, or slight hairline cracks; may be slightly weathered Good (75-85) - Slight to moderately weathered, slight distress, possibly patching Fair (60-74) - Severely weathered or slight to moderate levels of distress, generally limited to patches and non -load -related cracking. (City of El Segundo citywide weighted average PCI is 65.7). Poor (41-59) - Moderate to severe distresses including load -related types, such as alligator cracking. Very Poor (0-40) - Severely distressed, large quantities of distortion or alligator cracking. Failure of the pavement, distress has surpassed tolerable rehabilitation limits. Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 16 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December 2, 2015 Section ll CALCULATION OF PCI In order to calculate a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) value within MicroPAVER, specific street section data needs to be inputted into MicroPAVER to define the survey limits, asphalt types, pavement age and metrics. Pavement "sections" are pavement segments within the defined branch that have consistent pavement street classifications, construction/maintenance histories and use. Representative inspection samples are then selected and visually surveyed to locate distress data. This data is used to calculate the pavement sections Pavement Condition Index (PCI) which includes distress type, extent of the distress and its severity. The PCI is a condition rating that ranges from 100 (pavement section that is in perfect condition) to 0 for a section that has structurally failed and deteriorated dramatically. The PCI is calculated from three major data entries from our inspectors: 1. Distress Type (one of 20 AC or 19 PCC types); these include alligator cracking, bleeding, block cracking, corrugations, depressions, long/trans cracking, patch/utility cut, potholes, rutting, weathering, raveling, etc. 2. Distress Quantity (the square footage, length or count of a specific distress) 3. Distress Severity (the level of severity determined for each distress found; low, medium or high) th-Mory &Wk URCI ibRepd. P,.d Wod.Og WC.M Anagss #140Plan OG95rr—sd, UL tSal &A __.. Nelwdo .__w,....,,, yy �..._..,� _._.,.m...,... ... m.w. ..... Branch IpZTMAVE .... WDDDRUFFAVE Ll.1 Padwvn•arE,-AIll NOR!; �Nv...alllO' Summary data at lime of inspection ..... ......... _. Branch Use F21OWP Section SurfaceType: P._ Seclion Tnre Area: "�1;11`5- Sn°� Section Length: IF5 - SediunWidth: rI Inspection Date: q/1/2005 Edit lnspeotiom Detaled lnspectwn Comments calculate Conddro— SampleUnR 1 E S a�angr m01 Urrv2 Sim� r,� BI Mwph"r ci 'dn a,armnaarc: — IiS�ialXf56p "" 1A.AhWt q'9j4q N DE6"GdY:S11"N P` 02 pA(.(<1f1MNG V EDGE CR f- ul,'i Fd1LOC✓, CfR. l' P1F� .ru(6-F. OR OW -�;pa� :�w U1Nr. SH DsaO a o u , a.Xa " ,,,.gwr )dn r' High r C` It RA'2'7:UT'CUT r 16 SHOVING r 12 PCdIIJE,;HEDAG r 17 SLIPPAGE CR C" 13 mrN01.F:: r 18 SWELL r' 14 RRCRCOSING' r— 19 WEATHAPAVEL EN, t Fl !ure 6 _.. PCI Calculation Worksh4eet Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 Poor; 7.4; 23 Fair; 5.0 Poor; 11.2; PCI Distribution - Arterial Streets Very Poor; 3.2; _ 10% zVeryGood aF Good R Fair Poor a VeryPoor Figure 7 - Arterial Condition Distribution PCI Distribution - Local Streets Very Good; 1.7; Very Poor: 2.4: 8% 6% * VeryGood w Good % Fair < Poor zVeryPoor Page 17 Section 11 3ood;10.4; 32% 1; 6.5; 20% 2.3; 8% 11.7; 40% Im— Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 SECTION III CITYWIDE PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX REPORT A. PCI Map B. A to Z C. PCI Order Page 1 Section 111 Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December 2, 2015 PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX REPORT Page 2 Section 111 Listed alphabetically by street name or PCI, this report provides the City with a listing of pertinent inventory and pavement condition data for each inventory unit within the City's pavement network. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report notes the names, limits, classification, dimension, surface type, and lane configuration of each inventory unit. Detailed descriptions of the information appearing on this report are presented below: BRANCH NAME - The name of each inventory unit appears in this column. Generally, the inventory unit name is taken directly from a street sign; however, where no street signs are posted, the name appearing on the network map is noted instead. A sample set of street name suffix abbreviation definitions is presented below: AV - Avenue CT- Court CIR - Circle DR - Drive LN - Lane RD - Road ST - Street WAY - Way EB - East Bound NB- North Bound SB - South Bound WB - West Bound FROM - A description of the beginning limit of each inventory unit appears in this column. If the beginning limit exists between intersections, then the beginning limit description may be an address, post mile marker, or a distance from a known point of reference (e.g., "500' N/MAIN ST"). TO - A description of the ending limit of each inventory unit appears in this column. Like BEGIN limit, the END limit description may consist of a street name, an address, or a distance from a known point of reference. In the case of cul-de-sacs, or dead -ends, the END limit consists of and address, or a directional reference, such as "NORTH END," when no address is available. RANK - The codes for the five functional classifications as the inventory unit appears in this column are represented below. Basically, units are classified according to traffic volume. CODE DESCRIPTION A, B, C Arterials/Collectors E Locals SURFACE TYPE - A code was assigned to each inventory unit to describe surface type. CODE DESCRIPTION AC Asphalt Concrete PCC Concrete LENGTH - The length of the section within each branch, im- Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 3 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section 111 UNITS -The unit of measurement for the section length, typically linear feet (LF). AREA - The area of each section within a branch. UNITS - The unit of measurement for the section area, typically square feet (SF). PCI - Pavement Condition Indices were calculated for inventory units based on severity and extent of distress manifestations observed within the inventory unit. Ranging between 0 and 100, a PCI of "100" corresponds to a pavement at the beginning of its life cycle, while a PCI of "0" corresponds to a badly deteriorated pavement which is at or near the end of its life cycle. PCI CLIMATE LOAD AND OTHER — reflects "Section Extrapolated Distress"; these values are shown within MicroPAVER and within the Sample Distresses tab within the PCI window. Distresses are aggregated based on the type and severity level. For random samples, distress quantities are adjusted to reflect the extrapolated value based on the sections total area. Extrapolated distress deducts are classified as resulting from Climate, Load and Other distresses. The Distress Classification portion of the tab shows the "percent" of extrapolated distress deduct belonging to Climate, Load and Other (these percentages are shown within the PCI reports herein). Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo 2015 Pavement Management Program Page 4 Final Report — December 2, 2015 Section 111 Fiigure 9 — Et Segundo Pavement Condition Index PCI) Map City of El Segundo, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AII Streets Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A to Z) Arterials / Collectors I _ 0003 1 3 0003x3 Aviation BI I 124th St -230' N/EI Segundo BI A AC 1 5 1,120 1 63 , 70,560 92 1 0 48 52 10 01 2015 0004 4 0004x4 ;Aviation BI NB AT&SF RR Tracks El Segundo BI A i AC I 2 1,500 31 46,500 84 j 0 ] 87 13 10-07-2015 0005 124 ( 0005x124 ;Aviation BI SB 1138th St ,240' N/Rosecrans Av _ A AC 2 1,420 32 45 440 ' 99 0 100 0 10 07-2015 0005 5 0005x5 ;Aviation BI SB 116th St 1124th St A -I 3 AC _ 2-] 3,220 28 90,160 i 93 0 44 1 56 10-01-2015 0005 6 0005x6 !Aviation BI SB El Segundo JAT&SF RR Tracks A j AC 2 1,500 31 46,500 99 0 100 0 10 07-2015 0005 ( 7 0005x7 Aviation BI SB JAT&SF RR Tracks 138th St N/s A AC ?_ 2 2,010 32 I' 71,520 99 0 100 0 10-07-2015 0005 8 0005x8 Aviation BI SB 240' N/Rosecrans Ave Rosecrans Ave A PCC 4 240 75 18,000 73 j 61 39 0 10-07-2015 0005 1 9 00050 Aviation BI SB 230' N/EI Segundo Blvd El Segundo Blvd A PCC 1 3 230 39 ( 8,970 74 1 80 20 0 11-10-2015 0006 10 1 0006x10 Center St :Grand Ave El Segundo BI C AC 2 1,128 39 43,992 69 1S 63 22 10-06-2015 0006 11 0006x11 Center St Imperial Ave Mariposa Ave C AC 2 2,606 37 96,274 45 44 34 22 10 06-2015 0006 12 1 0006x12 Center St Mariposa Ave `Grand Ave C AC l 2 1,536 40 61,440 68 22 62 16 10-06-2015 0007 13 0007x13 ;Continental BI NB Grand Ave 'Mariposa Ave [ B AC 3 1 1,635 F+ 32 ; 56,820 63 40 49 11 ,10-06-2015 0007 14 0007x14 Continental BI NB -El Segundo BI Grand Ave B AC 3 1,030 32 33,710 90 0 100 0 10 06 2015 0008 15 0008x15 !Continental BI SB =Mariposa Ave Grand Ave B AC 3 I 1,635 1 32 56,820 77 1 9 68 23 10-06-2015 00088 16 0008x16 Contmental BI SB Grand Ave 3EI Segundo BI t B AC 3 1,630 32 j 36 -10 91 0 43 57 10-06-2015 0009 120 ! 0009x120 Douglas St Alaska Ave =Park PI C - AC ! 4 1,352 60 74,020 89 0 100 0 10-07-2015 0009 _ 17 ( 0009x17 )Douglas St -Coral Ct IS Outlet) 146' S/EI Segundo BI C AC 5 _ 1,940 ! 62 125,280 49 44 41 15 10-07-2015 0009 ? 18 0009x18 =Douglas St Rosecrans Ave ]Park PI C AC 3 4 841 62 56,542 46 49 1 42 9 10-07-2015 0009 ) 19 0009x19 !Douglas St )Alaska Ave (Coral Ct IS Outlet) C 1 AC 5 1,010 1 62 62,620 85 0 68 32 10-07-2015 0010 21 0010x21 Douglas St NB El Segundo BI 270' S/Mariposa Ave S/ A AC) 2 ! 2,134 98 !' 209,132 91 0 21 79 10 01-201S 0010 _ 22 ( 0010x22 Douglas St NB Mariposa Ave 42S' S/Imperial Hwy A AC 6 2,100 96 200,600 89 0 i 67 33 10-01-2015 0010 � 24 ) 0010x24 Douglas St NB 14255/Imperial Hwy Imperial Hwy A AC 2 425 34 14,450 88 ! 0 68 32 11-10-2015 39 25 39x25 Douglas St NB El Segundo Blvd 240' S/EI Segundo Blvd A PCC ' 3 24D 45 10,800 72 64 32 8 11-16-2015 0010 ! 26 0010x26 Douglas St NB 425' S/Imperial Hwy .Imperial Hwy A PCC i 3 425 44 ! 18,700 70 64 34 2 11-10-2015 0010 27 0010x27 Douglas St NB 270' S/Mariposa Ave Mariposa Ave A ( PCC 3 270 47 , 12 690 83 53 36 11 ! 10-01-2015 0010 __ 28 1 0010x28 Douglas St NB Mariposa Ave z77' N Mariposa Ave A PCC 5 77 82 ! 6,314 48 45 30 25 10-01-2015 0010 30 0010x30 Douglas St NB 146' S El Segundo Blvd EI Segundo Blvd. A PCC 5 [ 146 56 j 8,176 78 80 19 1 11-10-2015 0039 j 125 1 0039x12S ,Douglas St SB 425 S/Imperial Hwy 77' N/Mariposa Av A AC 2 ( 2,138 48 1 102,624 88 0 69 31 10-01-2015 0039 126 0039x126 --_Douglas St SB 77' N/Mariposa Av Mariposa Av j A ; PCC 2 77 48 1 3,696 71 67 28 5 s 10-01-2015_ 0039 ! 127 0039x127 !Douglas St SB €Mariposa Av ;255' N/EI Segundo BI , A _ AC 2 ! 2,394 48 114,912 90 0 66 34 10-01-2015 0039 128 0039x128 )Douglas St SB 255 N/EI Segundo BI Segundo BI A PCC 4 255 48 12,240 1 83 68 32 0 = 11-10-2015 0039� 23 0039x23 Douglas St SB !Imperial Hwy €EI ;425 5/Imperial Hwy A AC 2 425 21 8,925 84 0 71 29 11-10-2015 0012 - 31 [ 001201 iEl Segundo BI Main St _Whiting St C AC ( 2 1,396 42 58,632 73 20 67 13 1 10-06-2015 0012��3!' 0012x32 EI Segundo BI Center St Main St C AC 4 3,395 52 ; 176,540 76 j 0 72 28 10-06-2015 0012 0012x33 ?EI Segundo BI Sepulveda BI Center St C AC 4 2,661 I 52 1 154,338 62 42 46 12 10-01 8-2015 0013 `", 34 001304 IEl Segundo BI EB Nash St ;225' W/Douglas St A AC _ 3 1,277 36 46,722 29 j 75 21 4 11-10-2015 0013 35 0013x35 El Segundo BI EB 'Sepulveda BI 162' W/Nash St A AC 3 2,603 36 101,208 30 68 19 13 11-10-2015 0013 € 36 0013x36 El Segundo BI EB 60' E/Aviation BI ?Isis Ave ! A AC ! 3 _ 1,212 46 59,252 54 31 68 1 11-10-2015 0013 € 37 001307 ]EI Segundo BI EB 'Douglas St !225' E/Aviation BI A i AC ! 3 I 1,405 46 64,630 41 68 1 17 15 , 11-10-2015 0013 38 0013x38 I EI Segundo BI EB I162' W/Nash St Nash St A PCC = 4 ' 162 50 8,100 71 70 20 ! 10 11-10-2015 0013 z 39 001309 "El Segundo BI EB 'Aviation BI 60' E/Aviation BI A PCC 4 1 60 50 p 3,000 51 1 78 22 0 11-10-2015 PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 1 of 8 0 i City of El Segundo, CA Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A to Z) Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - AU Streets 001-3 ! 40 0013x40 -El Segundo BI EB :225' W/Aviation BI 3Aviation Blvd E/s A PCC 4 - 295 50 14,750 j 74 84 12 1 4 11-10-2015 0013 41 0013x41EI Segundo BI EBZ25' W/Douglas St Douglas St A PCC 4 225 50 11,250 73 71 13 16 11-10-2015 0014 li 42 0014x42 jEl Segundo BI WB ;Isis Ave 105' E/Aviation BI A j AC 3 j 1,212 1 39 1 55,268 45 0 51 49 11-10-2015 0014 1 43 001403 El Segundo BI WB 152' W/Nash St Sepulveda BI A AC 3 I 2,603 37 121,311 41 I 78 15 7 11-10-2015 0014 44 0014x44 El Segundo BI WB Aviation Blvd. 90' W Aviation Blvd. A PCC 4 90 45 4,050 78 88 6 6 11-10-2015 0014 ' 45 001405 El Segundo BI WB 90' W/Aviation BI 225' E/Douglas St A AC 3 1,405 50 78,250 37 71 28 i 1 11-10-2015 0014 46 i 001406 El Segundo BI WB .225' E/Douglas St ,Douglas St A PCC = 5 225 50 11,250 1 78 81 19 0 11 10-2015 0014 1 47 1 001407 El Segundo BI WB Douglas St ;160' E/Nash St A AC 3 1,277 43 69,911 42 72 25 3 11-10-2015 0014 48 0014x48 €El Segundo BI WB 160' E/Nash St )Nash St A E PCC ! 5 160 [ 50 8,000 65 73 26 1 1 11-10-2015 0014 49 001409 lEl Segundo BI WB Nash St 152' W/Nash St A ;PCC 3 52 50 ' 2,600 67 86 14 0 11-10-2015 0014 50 0014xS0 jEl Segundo BI WB 105' E/Aviation BI lAviation BI A PCC 5 17S 50 8,750 63 68 27 5 11-10-2015 0016 122 0016x122 ;Grand Ave ;Center St Maryland St B AC 4 485 47 22,795 57 41 47 12 10-08-2015 0016 123 0016x123 ?Grand Ave 'Kansas StW/s !Center St E/s B AC I 4 1,325 47 62,275 58 52 48 0 10-08-2015 0016 55 1 0016x55 ,Grand Ave =Maryland St 'Sierra St ) B AC 4 705 47 ' 33,135 84 0 58 42 10-07-2015 0016 56 1 0016x56 !Grand Ave !Sierra St !Eucalyptus Dr B AC 1 4 1,370 47 64,390 86 0 55 45 10 07-2015 0016 57 0016x57 ;Grand Ave ;Sepulveda Blvd W/s ;Kansas St E/s B AC 4 1,320 47 62 040 55 47 44 9 10-08-2015 0016 58 0016x58 =Grand Ave Duley Rd 'Nash St B AC 2 561 49 27,489 93 0 46 54 10-06-2015 0016 59 0016x59 ;Grand Ave 'Concord St E/s West City Limits C a AC 4 1,884 1 43 81,012 1 S9 0 63 37 10-07-2015 0017 60 001760 ,Grand Ave EB lContinental Blvd Nash St B AC ; 2 985 34 35,990 92 0 47 53 ` 10-06-2015 0017 1 61 ! 0017x61 Grand Ave EB ;Main St Eucalyptus Dr B AC _ 2 700 37 25,100 84 23 31 46 10 07-2015 0017 62 0017x62 Grand Ave EB ;Concord St W/s Main St E/s B AC 2 675 j 37 ( 22,475 79 7 72 1 21 10-07-2015 0017 63 0017x63 Grand Ave EB Sepulveda Blvd (Continental Blvd B AC i 3 1,440 32 50,580 92 1 0 48 52 10-06-2015 0018 64 0018x64 Grand Ave WB Main St E/s ;Concord St W/s C AC 2 670 37 [ 22,290 84 0 71 29 = 10-07-2015 0018 65 0018x65 Grand Ave WB Eucalyptus Dr I Main St B AC 2 710 36 25,560 87 9 48 43 10-07-2015 0018 66 0018x66 Grand Ave WB Continental Blvd Sepulveda Blvd_ B C AC i 3 1,460 40 63,200 92 0 46 54 10-06-2015 0018 67 0018x67 Grand Ave WB Nash St '.Continental Blvd B 1 AC 1 3 � 975 45 45,375 �' 92 _ 0 46 54 10-06-2015 0020 69 002Ox69 1 Hughes Way EB Allied Way EEast End B AC 3 820 37 31,090 38 41 47 12 11-16-2015 0020 j 70 002000 ;.Hughes Way EB ISepulveda BI Allied Way B =, AC � 3 I 1,200 37 46,400 46 � 65 35 ( 0 11-10-2015 0021 ? 71 002101 !Hughes Way WB East End !Allied Way B AC I 4 810 ! 42 ' 35,520 61 24 64 12 11-10-2015 0021 72 002102 Hughes Way WB Allied Way lSepulvecla BI B [ AC 3 ! 1,200 37 ' 47,400 47 53 41 ( 6 11-10-2015 0022 215 ; 0022x215 ;Illinois St Mariposa Av Grand Av C AC 2 1,519 32 48,608 58 39 33 1 28 10-08-2015 0022 1 73 002203 ;Illinois St 'El Segundo BI Franklin Ave C AC 2 560 40 _ 23,600 40 1 53 31 10 i 11-10-2015 0023 74 1 002304 lImperial Ave Center St California St C AC 2 910 40 36,400 42 53 39 8 10-08-2015 0023 75 0023x75 'Imperial Ave ,SheldonCenter St (St ! C AC 2 1,935 ! 40 77,400 59 46 46 8 i 10-08-2015 0023 76 0023x76 Imperial Ave IMain St 'Sheledon St C AC 2 1,390 , 40 55,600 61 41 1 47 12 10-08-2015 0023 77 002307 Imperial Ave "California St 1282' W/Sepulveda BI ' C AC 2 1,470 40 ' 58,800 61 48 45 7 10-08-2015 0023 79 0023x79 ]Imperial Ave HillcrestSt (Main St C AC ( 2 2,730 ! 40 109,200 72 49 39 12 10-01-2015 1510 1512 1510x1512 'Imperial Hwy SEPULVEDA BLVD HUGHES WAY A AC ;, 3 1,312 43 56,416 30 77 14 9 11 10-2015 CD 1510 1513 1510x1513 ;Imperial Hwy HUGHES WAY NASH ST A AC 3 1,440 ! 49 1 70,560 24 62 15 23 11-10-2015 1510 1 1514 1 1510x1514 jlmperialHwy ENASHST DOUGLASST A AC 3 1,312 48 62,976 1 28 ; 73 17 10 11-10-2015 z 1510 1515 1510x1515 lImperial Hwy ?DOUGLAS ST 'AVIATION BLVD A AC , 3 1,441 48 69,168 i 34 63 19 ' 18 11-10-2015 O 0025 211 ! 0025x211 Kansas St ?MariposaAv =HollyAv C I AC 1 2 1 999 40 39,960 50 56 44 0 11-10-2015 CF) 0025 1 80 0025x80 !Kansas 5t 1EI Segundo BI Holly Ave S/s C I AC 2 , 1,570 1 40 62,800 42 50 32 ; 24 11 10-2015 PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 2 of 8 City of El Segundo, CA Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A to Z) Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets 0026 ( 81 0026x81 LairportSt iMariposa Ave Maple Ave C AC 3 2 1 1,135 54 61,290 90 0 - 29 71 #10-01-2015 0027 152 0027x152 Main St Imperial Av City Limits B AC ' 2 j 126 56 7,056 89 p 0 66 34 10 08-2015 0027 82 0027x82 Main St Imperial Ave Mariposa Ave B AC 1 4 2,610 �, 56 146,160 83 0 j 68 32 10-08-2015 0027 1 83 0027x83 Main St 'Mariposa Ave (Grand Ave B AC 1 4 1,706 _... 56 91,084 89 0 46 54 10-08-2015 0027 j 84 i 0027x84 Main St Grand Ave El Segundo Blvd B AC 4 830 39 29,690 j 90 1 0 SS 45 10-08-2015 0028 85 0028x85 Maple Ave Main St E/s Sheldon St W/s C AC 2 1,400 30 42,000 1 52 1 55 40 5 1 11-16-2015 0028 86 0028x86 iMaple Ave !Sepulveda BI !Nash St C AC 4 2,610 53 138,330 99 0 100 0 i 10 01-2015 0028 87 0028x87 =Maple Ave Washington St Sepulveda BI C AC G 2 740 36 26,640 60 10 55 1 35 1 11-12-2015 0028 88 0028x88 Maple Ave =Sheldon St E/s _Center St W/s C AC 2 _ 2,000 36 67,500 51 i 45 40 ] 15 11 12-2015 0028 - 89 0028x89 Maple Ave ;Center St lWashingtonSt '_ C AC 3 2 - 1,800 36 64,800 ? 5 8 3 , 48 ; 14 11-12-2015 0029 281 0029x281 Mariposa Av (Main St IVirginia St C AC 2 ' 1,075 30 32,250 ! 90 35 58 7 10 01-2015 0029 3 282 1 0029x282 Mariposa Av Virginia St Hillcrest St C AC 2 1,327 1 30 1 39,810 L 84 0 38 _ 62 10-01-2015 0029 283 ' 0029x283 Mariposa Av Hillcrest St End C AC 2 597 30 17,910 85 0 42 58 10-01-2015 0029 90 002900 Mariposa Av _ _ Sepulveda BI W/s [Center St E/s C I AC ' 2 2,540 1, 36 91,440 66 53 15 32 310-01-2015 0029 91 0029x91 ;Mariposa Av ;Center St [Main St [ C AC 2 [ 3,290 s 36 118,440 - 86 1 49 17 34 10-01-2015 0030 92 003Dx92 (Mariposa Ave EB Sepulveda Blvd Nash St B AC 3 i 2,600 33 85,800 92 [ 0 31 69 10-01-2015 0030 93 0030x93 ;Mariposa Ave EB ;Nash St Douglas St B AC k 4 1,075 32 34,400 48 49 -.. 33 18 10-01-2015 0030 94 003Ox94 Mariposa Ave EB 9T W/of Douglas St .Douglas St B PCC 3 - 97 31 2,959 32 + 31 36 7 33 11 12-2015 0031 _ 95 0031x95 iMariposa Ave WB Douglas St W/s Nash St E/s B ; AC 2 i 1,150 i 32 36,800 i 41 51 32 17 10 01-2015 0031 97 0031x97 iMariposa Ave WB Nash St ISepulveda Blvd B AC 3 ' 2,595 1 35 90,825 96 0 49 [ 51 10-01-2015 0032 1 100 '-, 0032x100 Nash St Maple Ave Imperial Hwy C AC I 4 ; 1,439 48 69,072 77 12 70 18 10 O1-2015 0032 j 101 0032x101 Nash St El Segundo Blvd 21o' N/EI Segundo Blvd C PCC [ 2 1 210 41 _ 8,610 82 82 17 1 11 10-201S 0032 ] 102 0032x102 [Nash St Park PI ;Rosecrans Ave C AC j 4 895 60 ` 54,595 I 53 52 35 13 11 13-2015 0032 1D3 0032x103 :Nash St El Segundo Blvd 210' N/EI Segundo Blvd [ C AC 2 210 42 8,820 j 87 0 78 22 11-10-2015 0032 003208 Nash St 210' N/EI Segundo BI Mariposa Ave C AC 5 2,275 54 122,850 81 0 76 + 24 10 06_2015 0032 L _98 99 -- - 10032x99 _ Nash St ;Mariposa Ave _ !Maple Ave C 1 AC 4 1,170 56 68,220 81 0 64 36 ; 10-01-2015 0035 107 1 0035x107 €Rosecrans Av WB ;Sepulveda BI Flournoy Rd A AC 3 1 3,346 1 32 1 107,072 89 1 0 54 1 46 10-07-2015 0035 108 035x108 �RosecransAvWB FlourneyRd ,WestCityLimits A ( AC 3 i 3,279 33 110,547 [ 84 j 0 59 41 (10-07-2015 0035 109 - 003Sx109 Rosecrans Av WB )Apollo St jSepulveda BI A AC - 3 2,940 33 97,020 86 0 72 28 ( 10-D7-2015 0035 - 110 0035x110 'Rosecrans Av WB iAviation BI jApollo St i A ; AC 3 ; 2,361 i 33 82,593 82 0 60 40 [ 10-07-2015 0036 1 1111 0036x111 .Selby St ;Imperial Hwy Walnut Ave C I AC 2 610 33 C 20,130 35 64 30 6 11-13-201S 1500 1500 1500x1500 Sepulveda Blvd EI Segundo Blvd Grand Ave A AC 1 4 i 1,115 3 48 53,520 55 63 29 8 10-06-2015 1500 [ 1501 1500x1501 Sepulveda Blvd ;Grand Ave Mariposa Ave A AC 1 4 1,524 1 43 1 65,532 64 57 34 9 10 06 2015 1500 1502 1500x1502 Sepulveda Blvd Mariposa Ave (Maple Ave A AC 1 4 1,234 48 59,232 62 64 36 0 10-06-2015 1500 1503 1500x1503 Sepulveda Blvd Maple Ave ;Imperial Hwy A AC 4 1,447 49 70,903 57 53 39 8 1D-06-2015 1500 1504 1500x1504 ISepulveda Blvd Imperial Hwy Maple Ave A AC 4 1,448 48 69,504 57 39 51 10 10-06-2015 (D (D 1500 ? 1505 1500x1505 Sepulveda Blvd Maple Ave Mariposa Ave A AC 4 _ 1,505 49 _ 73,745 60 46 46 8 10-06-2015 1500 1 1506 1500x1506 'Sepulveda Blvd Mariposa Ave lGrand Ave A AC 4 ; 1,524 48 73,152 82 0 1 82 j 18 10-06-2015 (D 1500 1507 1 1500x1507 ISepulveda Blvd Grand Ave IN Segundo Blvd 1 A _ AC 4 1,115 48 53,520 [ 73 0 82 18 10-06-2015 y 0056 166 0056x166 [Sheldon St jImperial Av Maple Av j C AC 2 11405 30 42,150 78 57 32 11 10-08-2015 z 0056 I 167 1 0056x167 !Sheldon St Maple Av Mariposa Av C AC _ 2 1,236 30 37,080 97 0 0 100 11-10-2015 O 0056 169 0055x168 15heldon St 1Mariposa Av Pine Av ; C AC 2 495 ' 30 14,850 68 14 68 18 11 10-2015 Cl7 0056 170 _ 0056x170 Sheldon St o Grand Av _ End C _ AC 2 354 1 28 9,912 71 10 72 18 11 10-2015 - N) _ PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 3 of 8 0056 - 171 1 0056x171 ISheldon St 0037 ; 112 0037x112 Utah St 0038 113 i 0038x113 IVista Del Mar 0067 i 209 i 0067x209 :Washington St 0067 210 0067x210 ;Washington St Locals 0087 259 0087x259 i 118thSt 0088 _ 260 0088x260 1120thSt 0084 238 0084238 Acacia Av 0084 239 0084x239 Acacia Av 0084 ' 240 i 0084240 Acacia Av 0084 241 0084241 [Acacia Av 0084 242 0084242 =Acacia Av 0084 243 0084243 :Acacia Av 0001 I 1 0001x1 ,Alaska Ave 0082 f 234 1 0082x234 (Allied Way 0002 _ 2 0002x2 ?Apollo St 0055 163 0055x163 !Arena St 0055 164 OOSSx164 Arena St 0055 165 0055x165 Arena St 0089 261 i 0089x261 Atwood Way 0089 1 262 0089x262 ,Atwood Way 0045 141 0045x141 Bayonne St 0097 300 0097x300 ,Binder PI 0063 194 ( 0063x194 )Bungalow Dr 0063 195 0063x195 _Bungalow Dr 0063 196 0063x196 IBungalow Dr 0063 197 0063x197 =Bungalow Dr 0063 198 0063x198 -Bungalow Dr 0064 199 0064199 California St 0064 200 0064200 jCalifornia St 0064 201 0064201California St 0064 1 202 1 0064202 (California St 0064 ? 203 0064203 California St 0064 303 0064303 California St 0076 _ 224 0076x224 Campus Dr 0076 225 0076x225 Campus Dr 0050 151 j 0050x151 Cedar St 0048 j 148 004Sx148 ;Concord PI 0049 150 0049x150 'Concord St 0049 j 151 0049x151 :Concord St City of El Segundo, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A to Z) Grand Av (EI Segundo Blvd C j AC ! 2 �, 1,109 j, 35 ' 38,815 39 50 41 9 11-10-2015 Aviation BI Douglas St C AC 4 1,285 46 59,110 39 55 42 3 11-10-2015 45th St Grand Ave A j AC 4 4,408 44 193,952 1 77 j 7 j 65 28 10 07-2015 Maple Av Mariposa Av B 3 AC 2 % 1,234 32 39,485 43 56 38 6 10 08 2015 Mariposa Av 'Grand Av B AC 2 1,234 32 i 39,488 1 31 59 35 rt 6 11 10 2015 32.S 1 7,426,719 Aviation Blvd ;Hornet Way E AC ; 2 ) 252 ; 30 1 7,560 81 0 33 67 08 23-2012 Aviation Blvd Hornet Way E AC 2 i 252 30 71560 79 0 44 56 08-23-2012 HillcrestSt jEnd E AC ' 2 749 30 22,470 80 0 51 49 08-21-2012 HillcrestSt 1CedarSt E AC 2 2,449 30 1 73,470 48 13 39 48 08 21-2012 Pepper St Cypress St j E ( AC I 2 f 853 30 25,590 57 50 1 43 7 08-22-2012 Lomita St Center St E AC 2 ' 671 30 20,130 64 0 65 35 08-17-2012 Center St California St E AC 2 909 30 27,270 j_5S 0 F, 49 51 < 08 21-2012 California St ;End E AC _ 2 667 30 j 20,010 60 i 0 44 56 ( 08-21-2012 Aviation BI ;Douglas St E AC 4 1,410 46 64,860 7 78 10 12 08-23-2012 Hughes Way !Park PI E E AC _ 2 11684 45 75,780 28 66 26 1 8 08-2� 3-2012 Rosecrans Ave Park PI I E AC 4 ; 1,145 1 52 59,540 61 69 18 13 08-23-2012 Mariposa Av End E AC 2 321 j 28 l 8,988 62 20 37 43 08-22-2012 Mariposa Av Pine Av E AC I 2 469 28 ( 13,132 38 0 26 74 08-22-2012 Grand Av IEI Segundo Blvd E AC j 2 1,109 38 ' 42,142 57 38 28 j 34 1 09-22-2012 Nash St Douglas St E j AC j 2 1,359 25 33 975 76 0 80 20 08-23-2012 Douglas St 'Nash St E (AC 2 1,338 25 33,450 pp 77 0 59 41 08-23-2012 MapleAv Palm Av 1 E AC 2 699 ( 30 20,970 47 17 33 50 08 22 2012 Loma Vista St lWhiting St E AC 2 334 25 _ 8,350 63 49 50 1 08-15-2012 WalnutAv 1MapleAV E AC 2 - 746 30 22,380 63 47 46 �i 7 ; 08-17-2012 Maple Av ,Mariposa Av E i AC 2 1,233 28 34,524 62 48 1 51 1 08-17-2012 Pine Av End 1 E AC 2 251 30 8,780 45 0 37 63 08-22-2012 Pine Av (Grand Av E I AC I 2 1 1,021 30 j 30,630 44 56 26 18 08-22-2012 Elsey PI =E1 Segundo Blvd E AC 2 299 33 9,867 59 ; 17 49 34 08-22-2012 Imperial Hwy ;Imperial Av E AC 2 810 33 26,730 i 64 ; 40 57 3 08-21-2012 End Walnut Av j E I AC 2 1,418 34 48,212 1 42 60 19 21 08 21-2012 Maple Av IMariposa Av E I AC i 2 ! 1,234 33 40,722 59 0 53 47 08-21-2012 Mariposa Av lHolly Av E AC 3 2 i 999 1 32 31,968 34 40 24 36 08-21-2012 Grand Av Franklin Av E AC 2 ' 560 ( 38 21,280 54 14 39 47 ` 08-22-2012 Imperial Av End E AC 2 132 34 1 4,488 87 0 52 48 08-21-2012 Nash St Parkview Dr S E AC 2 663 34 22,542 89 0 100 0 08-28-2012 Parkview Dr S [Douglas St E AC 2 675 34 22,950 89 0 96 4 08-28-2012 Imperial Av ,Walnut Av E AC j 2 705 30 '-- 21150 56 51 33 16 08-21-2012 Sycamore Av Maple Av E AC 2 350 16 _ 5,600 70 22 42 36 08-22-2012 Mariposa Av ;Grand Av E AC 2 1,673 30 50,190 63 46 ( 54 0 ; 08-15-2012 Grand Av 1EI Segundo Blvd { E _ AC 2 950 30 ] 28,500 64 33 57 10 08-15-2012 PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 4 of 8 0 i City of Ell Segundo, CA Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A to Z) Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets 0079 231 ( 0079x231 Coral Cir Douglas St ;Douglas St E AC 2 1 1,744 1 45 I 78,480 26 66 22 12 08-23-2012 0054 162 0054x162 ;Cypress St Imperial AV Walnut AV = E _ AC 2 705 1 30 j 21,150 77 0 51 49 08-22-2012 0073 ? 220 0073x220 _Duley Rd ;.Mariposa AV Grand Av E AC ( 2 1,399 25 ; 30,778 93 0 59 41 08-23-2012 0042 1 138 0042x138 Dune St ;Acacia AV 'Sycamore AV E LAC j 2 689 32 Z2,048 92 0 65 35 08-21-2012 0092 279 0092x279 iElmAv Hillcrest5t ;End E AC 2 _ 330 20 6,600 79 0 j 100 0 08-15-2012 0092 280 0092x280 ;Elm AV :California St ;Washington St E AC ' 2 935 30 28,050 50 15 1 29 56 ;, 08-21-2012 0098 301 0098001 ,Elsey PI ;Bungalow Dr Center 5t I E AC 2 j 265 32 8,480 51 32 35 33 08 22-2012 0053 157 - 0053x157 ;Eucalyptus Dr ;Imperial AV MapleAv E AC - 2 1,405 37 51,985 67 31 59 SO OS-17-2012 0053 158 1 0053x158 Eucalyptus Dr Maple AV joak AV E AC 2 351 37 12,987 73 31 69 i 0 08-17-2012 0053 159 0053x159 Eucalyptus Dr Mariposa AV (End E AC 2 317 37 11,729 61 63 j 36 1 08-15-2012 0053 160 0053x160 Eucalyptus Dr Mariposa AV jGrand AV E AC ? 2 1 1,520 40 - 60,800 70 i 420 S2 6 08-15-2012 0053 161 j 0053x161 CEucalyptus Dr Grand AV fEl Segundo Blvd E AC 2 1,108 ( 37 40,996 65 5 43 7 08-15-2012 0015 3 236 0015x236 'Franklin Ave Main St Loma Vista St E AC 2 1,760 ! 39 - 68,640 58 41 46 13 ; 08-16-2012 0015 237 001Sx237 Franklin Ave -Loma Vista St City Limits E AC 2 144 39 - 5,616 67 0 99 1 08-16-2012 0015 j 51 OO15x51 ;Franklin Ave allinois St Kansas St E/s E AC 2 620 39 24,150 61 41 50 9 08 16-2012 0015 52 0015x52 lFranklin Ave Kansas St E/s -Center St E/s E _ AC 2 1,320 39 ? 51,480 ? 48 44 j 39 17 1 08-16-2012 0015 53 OO1563 1 Franklin Ave ;Center St E/s 'Sheldon St E/s E AC j 2 _ 1,946 30 58,350 49 37 45 18 08 16 2012 0015 ( 54 OO15x54 ;Franklin Ave :Sheldon St (Main St E AC € 2 1,435 ; 30 43,050 50 36 48 16 08-16-2012 0019 68 0019x68 Hawaii St 'Aviation BI 'Alaska Ave E AC 1 4 _ 1,450 46 66,700 15 79 15 6 OS-23-2012 0040 t 130 j 0040x130 ;Hillcrest St Imperial AV Sycamore AV E AC 2 1,057 35 36,995 L 68 0 72 28 08-22-2012 0040 _ 131 _ - 0040x131 _ ;Hillcrest St Sycamore AV Palm AV E j AC ; 2 ' 1,049 35 36,715 73 0 76 24 D8-22-2012 0040 � 132 0040x132 Hillcrest St ;Palm AV Pine AV E AC 2 1,031 35 j 36,085 68 33 53 14 i 08 15-2012 0040 133 0040x133 Hillcrest St 1 Pine AV jEnd E AC 3 2 I 714 28 19,992 61 34 66 0 08-15-2012 0095 293 0095x293 Holly AV ;Valley St Virginia St I E AC 2 998 30 29,940 71 23 67 10 08 15-2012 0095 294 0095x294 Holly AV Virginia St Main St E AC 2 1,075 30 32,250 65 ! 29 71 0 ' 08 15 2012 -- 0095 3 295 0095x295 {I Holly AV Main St - Eucalyptus Dr E AC j - -- 2 -� 729 - -- 30 21,870 63 35 65 j D 08-15-2012 0095 296 _ 0095x296 Holly AV Penn St Lomita St E AC f 2 700 30 21,000 ( 48 47 32 21 08-22-2012 0095 297 ; 0095x297 Holly AV Maryland St ;'Center St (, E AC 2 531 (_ 30 15,930 59 24 41 35 08-22-2012 0095 298 i 0095x298 Holly AV California St Sepulveda Blvd E AC 2 1,617 30 48,510 ( 47 40 38 22 08-21-2012 0068 214 0068x214 Illinois Ct Mariposa AV (End E AC 2 267 [ 32 9,794 66 43 31 26 08-21-2012 0023 78 002308 Imperial Ave West End ;Hillcrest St E j AC i 2 s+ 670 ++ 30 21 600 35 ' 52 48 0 10-08-2015 0069 216 0069x216 (Indiana Ct Maple AV ;End E AC 2 417 32 14,594 1 39 43 27 30 08-21-2012 0070 217 ( 0070x217 'Indiana St Mariposa AV Grand AV E ; AC 2 1,519 32 48,608 48 1 43 34 23 1 D8-16-2012 0090 273 0090x273 ;Irene Ct Penn St End E _ AC 2 288 ; 23 7 774 57 0 47 53 D 0041 134 0041x134 ;Loma Vista St Imperial AV Sycamore AV E AC 2 1,055 28 29,540 51 54 38 1 8 108-22-2012 j D8-15 2012 0041 135 0041x135 lLoma Vista St ;Sycamore AV ,Mariposa AV E AC 2 1,582 28 44,296 58 1 50 40 10 08-15-2012 CD 0041 136 0041x136 .,Loma Vista St Mariposa Av Grand Av E AC 2 1,700 28 47,600 66 ? 33 55 j 12 08-15-2012 0041 137 0041x137 1 Loma Vista St :Grand AV =Binder PI E AC 2 753 28 21,084 1 57 I 55 38 7 1 08-15-2012 CD 0061 183 0061x183 _Lomita St Acacia AV 'Maple AV ' E AC 2 1,179 33 3 35,907 65 38 S4 8 ; 08-17-2012 0061 184 0061x184 -Lomita St Maple Av Mariposa Av E AC 2 1,234 33 40 722 63 4S 44 8 0817-2012 z 0061 185 0061x185 ;Lomita St 1Pine AV End E AC 1 2 298 s 28 8,344 ( 62 45 46 ( 9 08-16-2012 O 0061 186 0061x186 !Lomita St Pine AV 'Grand AV E AC 2 1,019 1 28 28,532 57 j 40 46 3 14 08-16-2012 0061 j 187 0061x187 ,Lomita St ;Grand AV El Segundo Blvd -E AC 2 1,111 1 28 31,108 49 53 39 3 8 08-16-2012 PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 5 of 8 City of El Segundo, CA Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A to Z) Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets 0028 226 0028x226 Maple Ave ;Nash St ;Parkview Dr N E j AC I' 2 _ 6S7 30 20,610 92 i 0 48 52 OS-28-2012 0028 227 0028x227 Maple Ave ;Parkview Or N Douglas St E AC 2 630 30 18,900 i 86 0 71 29 08-28-2012 0028 j 263 0028x263 ;Maple Ave 'Main St lVirginia St E AC 2 1,074 30 32,220 1 68 28 ? 62 10 08-17-2012 ��- 0028 ' 264 1 0028x264 _Maple Ave !Virginia 5t 1 Hillcrest St E I AC i 2 1 1,681 30 50,430 65 39 53 S 08-17-2012 0028 265 0028x265 Maple Ave Hillcrest St End E AC 2 j 477 30 14,310 76 ( 0 ( 82 18 (08-17-2012 0062 188 0062x188 (Maryland St WalnutAv End E I AC 2 161 26 4,186 t 71 [ 0 100 ; 0 08-17-2012 0062 189 0062x189 Maryland St Walnut Av (MapleAv E AC 2 746 33 _ 24,618 € 68 25 63 12 08-17-2012 0062 190 - 0062x190 Maryland St Maple Av Mariposa Av E AC 2 �. 1,234 33 40,722 75 49 -.. _ 41 _ 10 ) 08-28-2012 0062 191 ' 0062x191 Maryland St !Pine Av jEnd E - AC 2 324 28 - 9,072 57 50 ( 38 12 08-16-2012 0062 192 0062x192 ;Maryland St Pine Av )Grand Av [ E I AC 2 1,021 30 I 30,630 ? 66 37 52 11 08-16-2012 0062 193 0062x193 jMaryland St ;Grand Av ,EI Segundo Blvd E ' AC 2 ; 1,109 30 33,270 55 1 42 42 s 16 08-16-2012 0058 !' 177 0058x177 ;McCarthy Ct Imperial Av Walnut Av j E i AC I 2 748 30 22,440 62 37 63 0 ( 08 17-2012 0058 178 0058x178 'McCarthy Ct WalnutAv Lomita St E j AC i 2 701 30 21,030 72 0 i 99 1 08 17 2012 0065 , 204 0065x204 Nevada St ;Mariposa Av Pine Av E AC 2 i 500 32 16,000 58 37 32 31 08-21-2012 0065 + 205 0065x205 Nevada St 'Pine Av End E AC ' 2 224 32 8,418 61 € 52 < 18 30 08-21-2012 0065 212 0065x212 Nevada St Grand Av ;EI Segundo Blvd E AC 2 1,109 32 35,488 49 64 30 ( 6 = 08-16-2012 0077 266 0077x266 `Oak Av Hillcrest St End E E ' AC 2 400 t� 30 ; 13150 68 ] 0 51 49 _ ; OS -22-2012 0077 267 0077x267 -Oak Av -Hillcrest St Loma Vista St E AC 2 849 30 25,470 61 17 42 41 1 08-22-2012 0077 268 0077x268 )Oak Av Bayonne St ,Virginia St 1 E AC 2 561 30 16,830 66 0 51 49 1 08-22-2012 0077 269 0077x269 ,Oak Av ;Virginia St Main St E € AC 1 2� 1,074 30 32,220 79 0 1 50 50 08-22-2012 0077 270 1 0077x270 10ak Av 'Main St =Sheldon St E AC 2 € 1,453 30 43,590 fit i 21 1 70 9 F08�17-20112 0077 271 _ 0077x271 !Oak Av5heldon St ;Penn St E AC 2 _ 454 30 13,620 72 0 3 74 26 22-202 0077 272 - 0077x272 'Oak Av Center St Washington St E AC 2 1,783 30 5 943 0 j 64 21 50 29 08-21-2012 0066 206 0066x206 jOregon St Mariposa Av Pine Av E j AC 2 499 32 15,968 56 49 39 12 DS-21-2012 0066 207 ( 0066x207 Oregon St Pine Av End E AC 2 369 32 11,808 52 59 15 ( 26 ( 08 21 2012 0066 213 + 0066x213 Oregon St Grand Av El Segundo Blvd E AC 2 1,108 32 35,456 48 42 ' 52 6 08-16-2012 0091 ; 274 0091x274 'Palm AV Hillcrest St -End E AC 2 , 339 30 10,170 51 49 1 51 0 08-17-2012 0091 275 0091x275 'Palm Av Hillcrest St Virginia St E AC 2 ( 1,681 30 ' S0,430 51 50 50 0 08 17-2012 0091 276 0091x27fi _Palm Av ;Virginia St Main St E ) AC 2 t 1,075 ( 30 32,250 44 37 40 23 08-17-2012 0091 277 0091x277 IPalm Av ;Sheldon St !Center St E AC 2 1,933 30 _ 57,990 47 49 40 11 08 28-2012 0091 278 j 0091x278 ;Palm Av .California St ;Sepulveda Blvd E AC 2 _ 1,755 30 52,650 1 51 12 35 53 08-21-2012 0033 104 0033x104 IPark PI Douglas St ;Nash St E AC 3 _ 1,830 52 95,160 34 62 23 i 15 ( 08 23-2012 0083 235 0083x235 `Park PIE Sepulveda Blvd ;Allied Way E AC 2 ? 1,023 45 ] 46,035 86 0 55 45 08 23 2012 0071 € 218 0071x218 Parkview Dr N 'MapleAv Atwood Way E AC _ 2 ' S78 51 29 478 91 0 64 36 08 23-2012 D 0072 __ 219 0072x219 ]Parkview Or 5 Campus Dr Mariposa Av ! E AC 2 474 33 15,642 i 93 0 71 29 08-23-2012 0057 172 0057x172 Penn St 'WalnutAv MapleAv E + AC _ 2 700 1 33 23,100 67 32 58 10 08-17-2012 0057 173 ) 0057x173 Penn St ;Maple Av Mariposa Av E AC 2 j 1,235 ; 28 34,580 65 28 71 ; 1 08-17-2012 0057 174 0057x174 Penn St IMariposa Av Pine Av E AC 2 495 30 14,850 62 22 27 51 08-22-2012 CD 0057 3 175 i 0057x175 Penn St Holly Av Grand Av E AC 2 519 30 15,570 34 51 23 26 08-22-2012 0057 3 176 ? 0057x176 I Penn St Grand Av El Segundo Blvd E AC 2 1,110 38 - 42,180 59 45 23 32 08-22-2012 Z 0051 j 153 0051x153 .Pepper St Imperial Av WalnutAv E AC 2 705 30 21150 ' S9 28 30 42 , 08-22-2012. O 0051 154 OOSix154 Pepper5t ;WalnutAv ;Maple Ave E AC 2 700 30 ; 21000 67 28 37 35 08-22-2012 0093 284 I 0093x284 1Pine Av Hillcrest 5t End E I AC 2_1 480 1 30 { 14,400 69 17 74 9 08-15-2012 PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 6 of 8 City of El Segundo, CA Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A to Z) Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets 0093 285 ' 0093x285 'Pine AV Hillcrest St :Virginia St E AC _ 2 - 1,329 30 1 39,870 1 58 1 32 65 3 08-16-2012 0093 I 286 0093x286 Pine AV Virginia St jMain St E j AC 2 1,076 1 30 32,280 43 55 45 0 08-16-2012 0093 - 287 0093x287 1Pine AV 'Main St Sheldon St E AC 3 2 3 1,434 30 43,020 48 53 41 6 = 08-16-2012 0093 _ 288 E 0093x288 ? Pine AV Sheldon St Center St E AC 2 1,932 30 i 57,960 55 44 ] 52 4 ) 08-16-2012 0093 289 0093x289 Pine AV 'Nevada St End E AC 2 207 30 7,460 74 18 44 38 08-21-2012 0093 290 0093x290 Pine AV Nevada St !Washington St E AC 2 1,313 30 39,390 37 ) 47 26 I 27 08 21-2012 0093 291 0093x291 Pine AV Illinois St Indiana St E € AC J 2 j 328 C 30 9,840 S1 1 68 26 6 1 08 21-2012 0043 _ 139 ' 0043x139 Redwood AV ..- - Dune St - 'End - ---i E --1-- AC ... _.� 502 32 17,214 93 0 78 22 ; OS-21-2012 0034 105 0034x105 ,Richmond St El Segundo BI Grand Ave S/s E ' AC 2 905 39 34,827 57 49 44 7 1 08-15-2012 0034 106 0034x106 'Richmond St Palm Ave Mariposa Ave E ] AC 2 562 35 19,970 64 43 44 13 08-17-2012 0034 121 I 0034x121 lRichmond St `Grand Ave Mariposa Ave E AC 2 1,630 39 63,070 53 66 27 7 08-15-2012 0056 169 �, 0056x169 :Sheldon St jPine AV End E AC e 2 1 277 [ 27 ? 7,479 56 0 77 23 08 22-2012 0060 ' 182 0060x182 SierraP1 'Pine AV 'End E AC E 2 378 35 14,380 78 i 0 53 47 08-22-2012 0059 179 0059x179 Sierra St 'Maple AV '=:Mariposa AV E AC 2 - 1,235 30 37,050 i 67 45 ] 54 1 1 108-17-2012 0059 [ 180 _ 0059x180 ]Sierra St ;Pine AV Grand AV E AC 2 1,020 < 33 33,660 57 21 43 36 08-22-2012 0059 181 0059x181 'Sierra St ;Grand AV El Segundo Blvd E ] AC 2 j 1,109 33 36,597 61 13 47 40 08-22-2012 0052 155 0052x155 I5tandard St ;Mariposa AV Grand AV E AC 2 1,580 37 58,460 58 59 33 8 i 08-15-2012 0052 156 E 0052x156 Standard St Grand AV El Segundo Blvd E AC 2 i 1,048 37 38,776 59 53 24 j 23 08-15-2012 0086 252 0086x252 Sycamore AV Hillcrest5t ':End E AC 2 643 31 _ 21,183 SS 1 0 71 29 08-21-2012 0086 253 0086x253 Sycamore AV Hillcrest St Virginia St E AC 2 1,651 31 52,111 57 23 37 40 08-21-2012 0086 ( 254 0086x254 Sycamore AV Virginia St !Main St E AC 2 1,073 31 33,263 60 16 52 32 08-21-2012 0086 255 0086x255 „Sycamore AV 'Pepper St =Sheldon St E AC 2 1,125 31 ] 34,875 61 15 34 ! 51 OS-22-2012 0086 256 0086x256 Sycamore AV Sheldon St :Penn St E AC 2 453 31 1 14,043 76 1 0 61 39 08 22-2012 0086 257 0086x2S7 'Sycamore AV lCenter St ,Washington St E AC (, 2 1,783 31 55,273 63 27 63 10 08-28-2012 0086 258 0086x258 5Vcamore Av Washington St Sepulveda Blvd E E AC 2 819 31 25 389 56 ] 26 42 32 OS 21 2012 0094 292 j 0094x292 Valley St ;Pine AV !End E ] AC 2 706 25 17650 76 0 99 1 08-15-2012 0047 145 I 004 15 4 Virginia St -imperial AV 'Sycamore AV E I AC 2 1,055 30 31,650 100 D 0 0 10-08-2015 0047 146 0047x146 lVirginia St Sycamore AV =Mariposa AV E AC 1 2 1,561 30 46,830 ] 67 24 65 11 1 10-08-2015 0047 l 147 0047x147 Vir inia St g Mariposa Av Grand Av 3 E AC 2 _ 1;698 30 50,940 1 66 35 56 9 10-08-2015 0047 148 0047x148 'Virginia St Grand AV (El Segundo Blvd j E ACE 2 ' 927 30 27,810 F 66 41 59 0 10-08-2015 0085 244 0085x244 ;WalnutAv i HillcrestSt IVirginiaSt j E AC 2 t 11682 30 50,460 62 25 62 13 08-17-2012 0085 245 0085x245 'WalnutAv ;Virginia St Main St E j AC 2 i 1,075 i 30 ( 32,250 66 32 1 59 9 08-17-2012 0085 246 0085x246 jWalnutAv Main St Sheldon St E AC 2 1,434 30 43,020 76 17 67 s 16 08-17-2012 0085 247 0085x247 WalnutAv Sheldon St IMcCarthy Ct E AC 2 758 30 22,740 65 f 17 71 12 08-17-2012 0085 245 OO85x248 lWalnutAv 'Maryland St Center St E AC 2 797 30 23,910 65 0 i 39 61 08-21-2012 ] 0085 249 0085x249 WalnutAv ;Center St Washington St E AC 1 2 1,783 30 53,490 61 11 37 52 08-21-2012 0085 250 , 0085x250 WalnutAv jWashingtonSt ISepulvecla Blvd E AC = 2 820 30 24,600 66 16 31 53 08-21-2012 0085 _ 251 0085x251 WalnutAv Sepulveda Blvd ISelby St E AC 2 643 30 19,290 45 27 47 26 08-21-2012 CD 0067 208 ? 0067x208 Washington St WalnutAv 1Maple AV E AC ] 2 748 32 E 23,936 ' S4 55 45 0 10-08-2015 0046 ] 142 i 0046x142 Whiting St iPalm AV Mariposa AV E I AC 2 534 30 16,020 72 40 59 1 08-15-2012 z OD46 143 0046x143 `Whiting St Mariposa AV ;Grand AV E AC 2 1,699 30 3 50,970 73 1 35 53 , 12 08-15-2012 0 0046 i 144 0046x144 Whiting St Grand AV El Segundo Blvd E AC 2 € 927 30 27,810 75 29 i 57 14 1 08-15-2012 CA 0044 ] 140 0044x140 Yucca St Maple AV )Endue _ AC ( 2 425 30 j 13,900 87 8 18 74 08-22-2012 IV PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 7 of 8 City of El Segundo, CA Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A to Z) Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets 0 (Q (D (D 3 (D .-f z O N PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 8 of 8 City of El Segundo, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets Sorted by Rank, PCI (0-100) !Arterials/Collectors 1510 1513 J 1510x1513 ,Imperial Hwy HUGHES WAY =NASH ST A AC 3 1,440 49 70,560 24 ) 62 15 ! 23 11-10-2015 1510 1514 1510x1514 !imperial Hwy ;,NASH ST DOUGLAS ST A AC 3 1 1,312 48 62,976 1 28 73 17 10 j 11-10-2015 0013 64 1 0013x34 4EI Segundo BI EB Nash St 225 W/Douglas St A AC 3 1 1,277 36 46,722 29 75 t 21 4 11-10-2015 0013 35 0013x35 EI Segundo BI EB Sepulveda BI 162' W/Nash St A AC 3 I 2,603 36 { 101,208 30 68 19 13 11-10-2015 1510 1512 ', 1510x1512 'Imperial Hwy SEPULVEDA BLVD iHUGHES WAY A AC 3 , 1,312 43 56,416 30 77 14 9 11-10-2015 0067 210 0067x210 ;Washington St ?Mariposa Av Grand Av B I AC 2 ! 1,234 32 39,488 31 59 35 6 11-10-2015 0030 94 1 003Ox94 jMariposa Ave EB 97' W/of Douglas St ! Douglas St B PCC 3 97 31 1 2,959 32 31 5 36 1 33 11 12-2015 1510 _ 1515 ! 1510x1515 Imperial Hwy !DOUGLASST AVIATION BLVD A AC 3 1,441 48 =" 69,168 34 1 63 19 18 11-10-2015 0036 111 0036x111 Selby St Imperial Hwy Walnut Ave C AC 2 610 33 20,130 35 64 30 6 1113-2015 0014 45 001445 El Segundo BI WB 90' W/Aviation BI 225' E/Douglas St A AC 3 1,405 50 78,250 37 71 28 1 11-10-2015 0020 _ 69 002Ox69 Hughes Way EB Allied Way East End B AC 3 € 820 [ 37 ! 31,090 38 41 47 12 �11-16-2015 0056 3 171 0056x171 Sheldon St :Grand Av EI Segundo Blvd C AC 2 1,109 35 38 815 39 50 41 9 11-10-2015 0037 112 0037x112 .Utah St Aviation BI Douglas St C ` AC 4 1,285 46 59,110 39 55 42 1 3 11-10-2015 0022 73 ( 0022x73 Illinois St 1EI Segundo BI Franklin Ave C I AC 2 560 40 23,600 40 53 1 31 10 11 10 2015 0013 R 37 0013x37 El Segundo BI EB Douglas St '225' E/Aviation BI A AC) 3 1,405 46 64,630 41 68 17 15 11-10-2015 0014 I. 43 0014x43 !El Segundo BI WB 152' W/Nash St ;Sepulveda BI ; A AC 3 2,603 37 121,311 41 78 1 15 7 �11 10-2015 0031 ' 95 ! 003105 ;Mariposa Ave WB Douglas St W/s Nash St E/s 1 B + AC 2 j 1,150 ; 32 ( 36,800 41 51 32 17 10-01-2015 0014 47 0014x47 El Segundo BI WB Douglas St !160'E/Nash St A AC - 3 j 1,277 43 69,911 42 72 25 ' 3 11-10-2015 0023 74 0023x74 Imperial Ave Center St !California St C AC 2 910 40 36,400 42 53 I 39 8 10-08-2015 0025 ! 80 ; 0025x80 Kansas St El Segundo BI Holly Ave S/s C ! AC 2 1,570 40 _ 62,800 42 1 50 32 24 11-10-2015 0067 ; 209 0067x209 Washington St Maple Av .Mariposa Av B AC 2 1,234 32 39,488 43 56 38 6 10 08-2015 0006 11 0006x11 ^Center St Y!Imperial Ave )Mariposa Ave C AC 2 2,606 37 _ 96 274 45 44 34 22 j 10-06-2015 0014 42 001402 1EI Segundo BI WB -Isis Ave 1105' E/Aviation BI A - AC 3 - 1,212 39 55,268 45 0 E 51 49 1 11-10-2015 0009 18 0009x18 Douglas St Rosecrans Ave ;Park PI C AC ( 4 841 62 56,542 46 49 42 9 ( 10-07-2015 0020 70 0020x70 Hughes Way EB 'Sepulveda BI Allied Way B AC 3 _ 1,200 37 ) 46,400 46 65 35 0 11-10-2015 0021 72 0021x72 'Hughes Way WB ;Allied Way ;Sepulveda BI B AC 3 1,200 37 47,400 47 53 41 1 6 11-10-2015 0010 28 0010x28 !Douglas St NB 'Mariposa Ave i 77' N Mariposa Ave. A PCC 5 _ 77 1 82 6,314 48 45 30 25 10-01 2015 0030 93 0030x93 Mariposa Ave EB Nash St jDouglas St B AC 4 _ 1,075 32 34,400 ; 48 49 33 18 10-01-2015 0009 € 17 0009x17 _Douglas St [Coral Ct IS Outlet) 1146' S/EI Segundo BI ( C AC) 5 ( 1,940 1 62 125,280 49 44 41 15 10-07-2015 0025 211 _ 0025x211 Kansas St Mariposa Av !Holly Av C + AC 2 999 40 1 39,960 50 56 44 0 11-10-2015 0013 ! 39 0013x39 '=.EI Segundo BI EB Aviation BI 60' E/Aviation BI A 1 PCC 1 4 j 60 50 1 3,000 Si 78 22 0 11 10-2015 0028 _ 88 0028x88 ;Maple Ave Sheldon St E/s Center St W/s C AC - 2 2,000 36 ( 67,500 51 45 1 40 15 11-12-2015 0028 85 0028x85 Maple Ave Main St E/s Sheldon St W/s C AC ! 2 1,400 30 `_. 42,000 52 (' 55 40 5 11-16-2015 0032 102 j 0032x102 Nash St Park PI Rosecrans Ave C AC 1 4 895 60 54,595 53 52 35 ( 13 11 13-2015 0013 _ 36 5 0013x36 EI Segundo BI EB 60' E/Aviation BI Isis Ave A AC ' 3 1,212 46 - 59,252 54 31 68 1 11-10-2015 0016 I 57 0016x57 Grand Ave Sepulveda Blvd W/s Kansas St E/s ! B AC ' 4 1,320 47 ! 62,040 55 47 44 9 10-08-2015 0028 89 0028x89 Maple Ave Center St Washington St !' C AC 2 1,800 36 64,800 55 38 48 14 11-12-2015 1500 1 1500 1500x1500 Sepulveda Blvd El Segundo Blvd :Grand Ave I A AC 4 ( 1,115 48 53,520 55 1 63 29 8 1 10-06-2015 0016 122 + 0016.122 Grand Ave Center St 'Maryland St B AC 4 485 47 22,795 57 41 47 12 10-08-2015 1500 1503 1500x1503 )Sepulveda Blvd -Maple Ave Imperial Hwy A - AC 4 1,447 ( 49 _ 70,903 1 57 1 53 a 39 8 10-06-2015 1500 1504 1500x1504 !Sepulveda Blvd imperial Hwy IMaple Ave ? A AC L 4 1,448 48 i 69 504 57 39 51 10 10-06-2015 PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 1 of 8 0 i City of El Segundo, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Rank, PCI (0-100) 0016 123 0016x123 ,Grand Ave ;Kansas StW/s Center St E/s B l AC I 4 1,325 47 62,275 58 52 48 0 10-08-2015 0022 ! 215 0022x215 Illinois 5t ;Mariposa Av ;Grand Av C AC 2 1,519 32 j 48,608 58 39 1 33 28 10-08-2015 0023 75 0023x7S ;Imperial Ave 'Sheldon St ;Center St C AC ( 2 1,935 40 77,400 59 46 46 8 10 08-2015 0028 87 0028x87 ;Maple Ave -,Washington St !Sepulveda BI C AC 2 740 ( 36 26,640 60 10 55 ' 35 11-12-2015 1500 1505 1500x1505 Sepulveda Blvd 'Maple Ave Mariposa Ave A AC - 4 1,505 49 73,745 ; 60 46 46 8 10-06-2015 0021 I 71 002101 ;Hughes Way WB 'East End Allied Way B A 4 j 810 3 42 [[ 35,520 61 24 64 12 1 11-10-2015 0023 76 002306 Imperial Ave Main St Sheledon St C AC 2 1,390 40 55,600 61 41 47 12 10-08-2015 0023 77 002307 Imperial Ave California St 1282' W/Sepulveda BI C AC j 2 i 1,470 40 58,800 61 48 ( 45 7 10-08-2015 0012 33 0012x33 El Segundo BI Sepulveda BI ;Center St C AC ? 4 2,661 52 1S4,338 62 42 J 46 ; 12 10-08-2015 1500 1502 1500x1502 !Sepulveda Blvd Mariposa Ave ;Maple Ave ( A ( AC 4 t 1,234 48 59 232 62 64 36 0 10-06-2015 0007 13 0007x13 Continental BI NB Grand Ave Mariposa Ave B ` AC 3 1,635 32 56,820 63 40 49 11 10-06-2015 0014 50 ! 0014x50 1EI Segundo BI WB 105' E/Aviation BI ;Aviation BI A PCC S _ 175 50 8,750 63 68 27 51 11-10-2015 1S00 f 1501 € 1500x1501 )Sepulveda Blvd 'Grand Ave IManpma Ave A AC 4 = 1,524 43 65,532 64 57 34 9 10-06-2015 0014 s 48 0014x48 _El Segundo BI WB 1160' E/Nash St !Nash St A PCC S 160 50 8,000 65 73 26 1 11-10-2015 0029 I 90 0029x90 _ _ ;Mariposa Av ']Sepulveda BI W/s Center St E/s � C AC 2 2,540 36 91,440 66 53 15 32 10-01-2015 0014 ( 49 0014x49 El Segundo BI WB ;Nash St 52' W/Nash St A j PCC' 3 i 52 50 2,600 67 86 14 0 1 11-10-2015 0006 12 0006x12 Center St ;Mariposa Ave Grand Ave C AC 2 1,536 40 61,440 6822 62 ] 16 -- 10-06-2015 0056 ? 168 ; 0056x168 Sheldon St Mariposa Av - Pine Av C AC 2 495 - 30 - 14,850 68 14 i 68 18 11-10-2015 0006 ; 10 0006x1O Center St Grand Ave EI Segundo BI C AC 2 1,128 39 43,992 69 15 63 22 10 06-2015 0010 ' 26 001Ox26 =Douglas St NB ,J425' S/Imperial Hwy )Imperial Hwy A ;PCC 3 ' 425 44 18,700 [. 70 64 34 2 11-10-2015 0039 126 ( 0039x126 Douglas St SB 7T N/Mariposa Av Mariposa Av A PCC 2 ` 77 48 1 3,696 71 67 28 S 10-01-2015 0013 38 0013x38 El Segundo BI EB 162' W/Nash St Nash St A PCC I 4 162 50 8,100 71 70 20 10 11-10-2015 0056 ; 170 0056x170 ,Sheldon St 'Grand Av iEnd C AC I 2 3S4 _ 28 9,912 71 10 72 18 11-10-2015 39 25 39x25 Douglas St NB El Segundo Blvd I240' S/EI Segundo Blvd ' A PCC 3 240 45 10,800 72 i 64 1 32 8 11-16-2015 0023 79 0023x79 ;Imperial Ave lHillcrestSt (Main St 3 AC ) 2 2,730 40 109,200 1 72 49 39 12 1 10-01-2015 0005 8 ( OOOSx8 Aviation BI SB 1240' N/Rosecrans Ave I Rosecrans Ave -C A PCC = 4 240 i 75 18,000 73 61 39 0 10-07-2015 0012 31 001201 ;El Segundo BI Main St Whiting St C AC 2 1,396 i 42 58,632 I 73 20 67 13 10-06-2015 0013 I 41 0013x41 El Segundo BI EB 1225' W/Douglas St Douglas St A PCC 4 225 50 1 11,250 73 C 71 1 13 3 16 11-10-ZO15 1S00 ( 1507 1500x1507 Sepulveda Blvd Grand Ave (El Segundo Blvd A AC 4 1,115 48 _ 53,520 73 0 ;R 82 18 10-06-2015 0005 j 9 OOO5x9 Aviation BI SB 230' N/EI Segundo Blvd j',El Segundo Blvd A PCC 3 230 39 8,970 74 SO 20 0 11-10-2015 0013 j 40 0013x40 El Segundo BI EB 225' W/Aviation BI ;Aviation Blvd E/s A ( PCC 4 295 50 i 14 7SO 74 84 12 4 11-10-2015 0012 32 j 0012x32 El Segundo El Center St ;Main St C AC 4 c 3,395 52 176 S40 76 0 72 28 [ 10-06-2015 0008 j 15 0008x15 _Continental BI SB Mariposa Ave IGrand Ave B , AC 3 1,635 32 56,820 77 9 k 68 ! 23 10 06-2015 0032 100 0032x100 ;Nash St _.Maple Ave Imperial Hwy C AC 4 1 1,439 I 48 69,072 77 12 70 18 10-01-2015 � 0038 l 113 0038x113 Vista Del Mar 45th St Grand Ave A AC 4 4,408 1 44 3 193,952 ? 77 7 65 28 1 10-07-2015 0010 30 001000 ,Douglas St NB 146' S El Segundo Blvd. e ;EI Segundo Blvd. A PCC j 5 146 56 I 8,176 78 80 19 1 11 10-2015 CD 0014 44 0014.44 El Segundo BI WB .Aviation Blvd. 90' W Aviation Blvd. A PCC ' 4 1 90 1 45 4,050 78 88 6 6 11-10-2015 0014 46 0014x46 El Segundo BI WB =225' E/Douglas St Douglas St A PCC ° 5 3 225 1 50 11,250 78 81 19 0 11-10-2015 CD 0056 166 0056x166 Sheldon St :Imperial Av ;Maple Av C AC 2 1,405 1 30 42,150 78 57 32 11 10-08-2015 0017 ( 62 0017x62 ;Grand Ave EB :Concord St W/s Main St E/s B , AC I 2 _ 675 37 22,475 79 7 72 21 10-07-2015 z 0032 98 3 0032x98 ;Nash St 210' N/EI Segundo BI Mariposa Ave C AC 5 2,275 54 ) 122,850 81 0 76 24 SO-06-2015 0 0032 99 0032x99 )Nash St Mariposa Ave Maple Ave C AC 3 4 1,1�O16 68,220 81 0 64 36 10-01-2015 �0032 101 0032x101 Nash St EI Segundo Blvd __- 210' N/EI Segundo Blvd C PCC j 2 211 8,610 S2 82 17 1 11-10-2015 N) PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 2 of 8 City of El Segundo, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets Sorted by Rank, PCI (0-100) 0035 1 110 0035x110 [Rosecrans Av WB Aviation BI =Apollo St - A € AC 1 3 2,361 E 33 - 82,593 82 3 0 60 40 1 10-07-2015 1500 1506 1500x1506 [Sepulveda Blvd Mariposa Ave Grand Ave A - AC 4 1,524 48 73,152 82 0 82 18 10 06 2015 0010 i 27 0010x27 `Douglas St NB 270' S/Mariposa Ave °Mariposa Ave A :PCC ' 3 270 47 12,690 83 53 36 11 10-01-2015 0039 128 6 0039 21x 8 =Douglas St SB 255 N/EI Segundo el El Segundo BI A PCC 4 255 48 1 12,240 ] 83 ± 68 32 � 0 11-10-2015 0027 82 0027x82 :Main St `Imperial Ave Mariposa Ave B AC 4 2,610 56 146,160 ] 83 0 i 68 32 10-08-2015 0004 3 4 00044 !Aviation BI NB AT&SF RR Tracks !El Segundo BI 1 A j AC _ 2 1,500 31 46,500 ± 84 0 87 13 10-07-2015 0039 23 0039x23 Douglas St SB Elmperial Hwy 425' S/Imperial Hwy A I AC 2 E 425 21 8,925 84 0 71 29 11-10-2015 0016 55 0016x55 Grand Ave Maryland St Sierra St B AC , 4 j 705 1 1 47 33,135 84 0 58 42 10-07-ZO15 0017 61 0017x61 Grand Ave EB Main St Eucalyptus Dr B AC 2 700 37 ( 25,100 84 23 ? 31 46 10-07-2015 0018 64 0018x64 Grand Ave WB Main St E/s !Concord St W/s C AC 2 670 37 22,290 84 0 71 29 10-07-2015 0029 282 0029x282 Mariposa Av Virginia St Hillcrest St C E AC 2 1,327 30 39,810 84 0 38 62 10-01-2015 0035 108 0035x108 .Rosecrans Av WB Flourney Rd West City Limits A AC 3 3,279 i 33 110,5477 84 0 59 41 10-07-2015 0009 19 0009x19 Douglas St Alaska Ave Coral Ct (S Outlet) C AC 5 1,010 62 62,620 85 0 68 32 10-07-2015 0029 283 0029x283 IMariposa Av =Hillcrest St 'End C E AC 2 597 30 17,910 85 0 42 58 10-01-2015 0016 56 1 0016x56 !Grand Ave !Sierra St ;Eucalyptus Dr B i AC 4 1 1,370 1 47 1 64,390 86 0 55 45 10-07-2015 0029 91 002901 [Mariposa Av Center St 'Main St C ' AC _ 2 ` 3,290 36 118,440 86 49 17 34 10-01-2015 0035 109 0035x109 (Rosecrans Av WB Apollo St Sepulveda BI A ; AC 3 2,946 33 97,020 86 0 ? 72 ' 28 10-07-2015 0018 65 j 0018x65 Grand Ave WB !Eucalyptus Dr Main St B AC 2 i 710 36 25,560 87 9 48 ; 43 10 07-2015 0032 s 103 0032x103 Nash St 1,El Segundo Blvd 210' N/EI Segundo Blvd C AC _ 2 210 42 8,820 87 0 78 22 11-10-2015 0010 24 0010x24 Douglas St NB 425' S/Imperial Hwy ;Imperial Hwy A AC j 2 425 34 14,450 88 0 68 ( 32 11 10-2015 0039 125 0039x125 Douglas St SB 425' S/Imperial Hwy 77' N/Mariposa Av A AC 2 2,138 48 102,624 ', 88 ] 0 ( 69 31 10-03-2015 0009 i 120 0009x120 'Douglas St 'Alaska Ave !Park PI C AC 4 1,35Z 60 74 020 S9 0 100 0 10 07-2015 0010 ': 22 1 0010x22 r0ouglas St NB Mariposa Ave !425' S/Imperial Hwy_L A € AC 6 2,100 96 200,600 89 0 67 33 110-01-2015 0016 , 59 001669 !Grand Ave ;Concord St E/s ;West City Limits I C AC 4 1,884 1 43 _ 81,012 89 0 63 37 10 07-2015 0027 152 0027x152 Main St Imperial Av City Limits B AC 2 126 56 7,056 j 89 0 66 1 34 ; 10-08-2015 D027 83 0027x83 Main St ;Mariposa Ave - - Grand Ave B AC 6 4 1,706 56 91,084 ! 89 0 [ 46 54 10-08-2015 0035 107 0035x107 .Rosecrans Av WB ;Sepulveda BI :Flournoy Rd A AC 3 3,346 32 107,072 89 0 54 46 10-07-2015 0007 14 ` 0007x14 _Continental BI NB El Segundo BI :Grand Ave ! B AC 1 3 1,030 32 33,710 90 0 100 � 0 10-06-2015 0039 127 - 0039x127 Douglas St SB 'Mariposa Av 1255' N/EI Segundo BI A AC 2 2,394 48 114,912 90 0 66 34 10 O1-2015 0026 81 0026x81 1 Lairport St Mariposa Ave !Maple Ave C AC 2 ? 1,135 - 54 61,290 j 90 0 29 71 10-01-2015 0027 84 0027x84 Main St 'Grand Ave - (El Segundo Blvd j B 1 ACE 4 830 ; 39 [ 29,690 90 0 55 45 10-08-2015 0029 1 281 0029x281 ;Mariposa Av ;Main St lVirginia St C AC 2 1,075 30 ; 32,250 90 35 58 7 10 01-2015 0008 16 0008x16 Continental BI SB ;Grand Ave El Segundo BI B AC 3 1,030 32 36,210 91 0 1 43 57 10-06-2015 0010 ! 21 0010x21 Douglas St NB El Segundo BI 270' S/Mariposa Ave S/' A AC ? 2 2,134 98 209,132 91 0 j 21 79 10-01-2015 0003 3 0003x3 Aviation BI 124th St 230' N/EI Segundo BI A AC 5 1,120 63 ! 70,560 92 0 48 52 10 01-2015 0017 60 0017x60 Grand Ave EB Continental Blvd =Nash St € B AC I 2 985 34 i 35,990 92 0 47 53 10 06-2015 0017 63 0017x63 !Grand Ave E8 Sepulveda Blvd ;Continental Blvd B t AC 3 1,440 j 32 _ 50,580 92 0 48 52 10-06-2015 0015 _ 66 0018x66 IGrand Ave WB Continental Blvd Sepulveda Blvd B AC 3 1,460 40 63,200 92 j 0 46 54 , 10-06-2015 CD 0018 1 67 0018x67 Grand Ave WB Nash St Continental Blvd B AC 3 ( 975 45 45,375 92 ! 0 46 54 10-06-2015 0030 92 003Ox92 !Mariposa Ave EB Sepulveda Blvd Nash St B AC 3 ! 2,600 33 s 85,800 92 3 0 31 69 ' 10-01-2015 z 0005 5 0005x5 jAviation BI SB €116th St 124th St i A AC [ 2 3,220 28 j 90,160 93 0 44 ; 56 10-01-2015 0 0016 SS 0016x58 'Grand Ave _ Duley Rd !Nash St B AC 2 561 49 27,489 ! 93 0 46 54 10-06-2015 0031 97 0031x97 Mariposa Ave WB Nash St 'Sepulveda Blvd B AC I 3 _ 2,595 - 35 -- 90,825 96 0 49 51 _ SO O1-2015 [ - N PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 3 of 8 0056 E 167 � 0056x167 ]Sheldon St 0005 I 124 0005x124 3Aviation BI SB 0005 E 6 0005x6 Aviation BI SB 0005 7 000Sx7 Aviation BI SB 0028 86 0028x86 Maple Ave Locals 0001 1 1 0001x1 Alaska Ave 0019 68 0019x68 IHawaii St 0079 231 0079x231 `,Coral Cir 0082 234 _ 0082x234 _Allied Way 0064 202 0064x202 jCalifornia St 0033 �104 0033x104 Park PI 0057 E 175 0057x175 Penn St 0023 3 78 002308 Imperial Ave 0093 290 ( 0093x290 :Fine AV 0055 164 0055x164 jArena St 0069 216 0069x216 _Indiana Ct 0064 200 s 0064200 ;California St 0093 286 0093x286 !Pine AV 0063 197 - 0063x197 'Bungalow Dr 0091 276 0091x276 Palm AV 0063 196 0063x196 Bungalow Dr 0085 251 s 0085x251 WalnutAv 0045 E 141 0045x141 Bayonne St 0095 298 = 0095x298 Holly AV 0091 277 0091x277 Palm AV 0084 239 0084x239 Acacia AV 0015 52 ] 0015x52 'Franklin Ave 0095 296 0095x296 Holly AV 0070 217 11 0070x217 _Indiana St 0066 213 0066x213 Oregon St 0093 287 0093x287 Pine AV 0015 53 0015x53 ?Franklin Ave 0061 187 0061x187 'Lomita St 0065 212 0065x212 Nevada St 0092 280 I 0092x280 -Elm AV 0015 _ 54 001564 1 Franklin Ave 0098 301 0098x301 IElsey PI 1 0041 _ 134 0041x134 Loma Vista St 0091 _ 274 - 0091.274 Palm AV 0091 - 275 0091x275 IPalm AV City o/ El Segundo, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -All Streets Sorted by Rank, PCI (0-100) MapleAv IMariposaAV C AC 1 2 1 1,236 30 11 37,080 97 0 0 100 ill-10-2015 138th St 240- N/Rosecrans Av A AC 2 1,420 32 45,440 99 0 j 100 j 0 10-07-2015 ElSegundo I AT&SF RR Tracks A AC 2 1,500 31 I 46,500 99 0 100 0 10-07-2015 AT&SF RR Tracks Sepulveda BI 1138th St N/s Wash St A C AC AC 1 2 4 2,010 2,610 32 53 1 71,520 138,330 99 99 0 0 100 100 0 10-07-2015 0 10-01-2015 I 32.5 7,426,719 Aviation BI [Douglas St E 1 AC 1 4 1,410 46 i 64,860 7 78 10 12 108-23-2012 Aviation BI Alaska Ave E AC ( 4 1,450 46 j 66,700 1 15 79 1 15 6 08-23-2012 Douglas St ;Douglas St E AC _ 2 1,744 45 78,480 26 66 22 12 08-23-2012 Hughes Way IE Park PI E I AC , 2 1,684 1 45 75,780 28 66 26 8 08-23-2012 Mariposa AV LHolly AV E AC 2 999 ; 32 C 31,968 34 40 1 24 36 1 08 21-2012 Douglas St Nash St E AC 3 ' 1,830 j 52 95,160 34 62 23 15 08-23-2012 Holly AV lGrand AV E AC 2 519 30 15 570 34 51 23 26 E 08 22-2012 West End Hillcrest St E AC 2 670 30 _ 21,600 35 1 52 48 0 10-08-2015 Nevada St !Washington St E AC 2 1,313 30 39,390 37 47 26 27 08-21-2012 Mariposa AV Pine AV E AC f 2 469 28 13,132 1 38 i 0 26 74 1 08-22-2012 MapleAv End E ( ACI 2 417 32 j 14 594 1 39 43 27 30 108-21-2012 End ;WalnutAv E ` ACT 2 1,418 34 1 48212 42 60 19 1 21 08-21-2012 Virginia St =Main St E AC E 2 1,076 30 32,280 43 j S5 45 0 08-16-2012 Pine AV jGrand AV E , AC 1 2 , 1,021 30 30,630 44 56 26 18 08-22-2012 Virginia St Main St E AC 1 Z 1,075 1 30 32,250 44 37 40 23 08-17-2012 Pine AV End E 1 AC 2 251 ; 30 8,780 45 0 37 63 08-22-2012 Sepulveda Blvd Selby St E AC 2 643 30 19,290 45 27 47 3 26 08-21-2012 MapleAv Palm AV El AC ( 2 699 30 20,970 47 ( 17 33 50 08-22-2012 California St (Sepulveda Blvd E AC j 2 1,617 30 48,510 47 40 j 38 22 08-21-2012 Sheldon St Center St E AC 2 1,933 30 57,990 47 49 40 11 08-28-2012 Hillcrest St ;Cedar St ':, E AC 2 2,449 30 73,470 48 1 13 39 48 08-21-2012 Kansas St E/s ECenter St E/s E 1 AC 2 1,320 39 51,480 48 44 39 17 08-16-2012 Penn St 1Lomita St E AC 2 700 ' 30 21,000 48 j 47 32 21 08-22-2012 Mariposa AV ,Grand AV E AC 2 1,519 32 1 48,608 48 43 ', 34 23 ; 08-16-2012 Grand AV 1EI Segundo Blvd E AC 2 1,108 32 ' 35,456 48 42 52 6 ; 08-16-2012 Main St Sheldon St E AC 2 _ 1,434 1 30 43,020 48 53 41 6 08-16-2012 Center St E/s ISheldon St E/s E AC % 2 1946, 1 30 59,380 49 37 45 18 08-16-2012 Grand AV 1,EI Segundo Blvd E AC 2 1,111 28 31,108 49 53 39 8 C 08-16-2012 Grand AV =EI Segundo Blvd E 1 AC 2 1,109 E 32 35,488 49 64 30 6 j 08-16-2012 California St ilWashington St ' E j AC 2 _ 935 30 28,050 1 50 15 E 29 i 56 1 08-21-2012 Sheldon St Main St E AC 2 1,435 30 43,050 50 36 48 16 08-16-2012 Bungalow Dr Center St E AC 2 265 32 1 8,480 1 51 32 35 33 08-22-2012 Imperial AV Sycamore AV E AC 2 j 1,055 28 29,540 51 54 1 38 8 05-15-2012 Hillcrest St End E AC i 2 1 339 30 10,170 51 49 I 51 0 08-17-2012 Hillcrest St [Virginia St E AC j 2 1,681 3D 50,430 51 50 50 0 08-17-2012 PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 4 of 8 0 i (Q (D (D 3 (D .-f z O C� N_ City of El Segundo, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets Sorted by Rank, PCI (0-100) 0091 278 1 0091x278 !Palm Av :California St !Sepulveda Blvd E AC 2 1,755 30 52,650 51 ; 12 35 ; 53 OS-21-2012 0093 291 0093x291 _Pine Av Illinois StIndiana St E AC 2 328 30 9,840 51 68 26 6 08-21-2012 0066 207 0066x207 Oregon St :Pine Av End E AC 1 2 369 32 11,808 52 59 15 26 08-21-2012 0034 i 121 ! 0034x121 ;Richmond St Grand Ave Mariposa Ave E ' AC 2 1,630 39 63,070 53 66 i 27 7 08-15-2012 0064 203 ! 0064x203 California St Grand Av Franklin Av E AC i 2 560 38 3 21,280 54 14 39 47 08-22-2012 0067 ! 208 0067x208 Washington St !Walnut (MapleAv E AC 7 2 748 32 ' 23,936 54 _ SS 45 0 10-08-2015 0084 242 0084x242 Acacia Av Center St _ California St E AC 2 909 30 3 27,270 55 0 49 51 08-21-2012 0062 193 0062x193 rMaryland St ,Grand Av 1EI Segundo Blvd E AC Y 2 1,109 30 3 33,270 55 42 42 16 ' 08-16-2012 0093 288 0093x288 _Pine Av 15helclon St !Center St E ! AC 2 1,932 30 57,960 E 55 44 52 4 i 08-16-2012 0050 151 0050x151 ;Cedar St ;ImperialAv 'Walnut Av E AC 2 705 30 21,150 56 51 33 16 08-21-2012 0066 206 j 0066x206 ;Oregon St jMariposa Av Pine Av ! E AC 2 499 32 15,968 56 ! 49 39 12 08 21-2012 0056 169 0056x169 Sheldon St -Pine Av End ' E AC 2 277 27 7,479 56 0 77 23 08-22-2012 0086 [ 258 ] 0086x258 Isvcamore Av Washington St ISepulvecla Blvd E ; AC 1 2 819 31 25,389 56 26 42 32 08-21-2012 0084 240 0084x240 ?Acacia Av IPepperSt ICypress St E f AC ! 2 ' 853 30 25,590 57 50 1 43 i 7 08-22-2012 0055 165 0055x165 Arena St ;Grand Av El Segundo Blvd g E AC 2 1,109 38 = 42,142 57 38 28 j 34 08-22-2012 0090 273 009Ox273 IreneCt 'Penn St [End E AC j 2 288 23 _ 7,774 57 i 0 47 53 08-22-2012 0041 137 I 0041x137 Loma Vista St Grand Av ,Binder PI ' E j AC 2 753 �, 28 ? 21,084 57 55 38 7 08-15-2012 0061 18610061x186 '"Lomita St Pine Av Grand Av E 1 AC 2 1,019 1 28 ! 28,532 57 40 46 14 : 08-16-2012 0062 191 0062x191 'Maryland St Tine Av End E AC 2 ! 324 28 j� 9,072 57 50 38 12 i0816-2012 0034 105 I 0034x105 (Richmond St EI Segundo BI ]Grand Ave S/s E AC it 2 905 39 j 34,827 57 49 44 7 08 15-2012 0059 180 0059x180 iSierra St 'Pine Av ;Grand Av E ( AC 2 _ 1,020 33 33,660 57 1 21 43 36 08-22-2012 0086 253 0086x253 'Sycamore Av Hillcrest St Virginia St E AC 2 1,681 31 S2,111 ' 57 23 _ 37 40 08-21-2012 0015 236 _ 0015x236 (Franklin Ave 'Main St jLoma Vista St j E , AC 2 1,760 39 68,640 58 41 46 13 08-16-2012 0041 ! 135 ! 0041x135 Loma Vista St ;Sycamore Av Mariposa Av E AC 2 j 1,582 28 i 44,296 58 50 40 10 08-15-2012 0065 204 0065x204 Nevada St :Mariposa Av Pine Av E AC _ 2 500 32 ; 16,000 58 ;, 37 32 31 08 21-2012 0093 _ 285 0093x285 Pine Av I Hillcrest St Virginia St E AC 2 1,329 30 39,870 58 32 65 ( 3 08 16-2012 0052 155 0052x155 Standard St 'Mariposa Av Grand Av E AC I 2 1,580 37 ' 58,460 58 59 33 ( 8 08-15-2012 0063 ' 198 j 0063x198 I Bungalow Or Elsey PI EI Segundo Blvd ' E AC 2 299 33 9,867 59 17 49 34 08-22-2012 0064 201 0064x201 [.California St - Maple Av _Mariposa Av E C 2 '' 1,234 � 33 40,722 59 ! 0 53 � 47 08-21-2012 0095 297 0095x297 ;Holly Av Maryland St ,Center St ! E [AC 2 I 531 30 15,930 59 24 41 35 08-22-2012 0057 1 176 t_ 0057x176 (Penn St Grand Av IEI Segundo Blvd E AC) 2 € 1,110 38 42,180 3 59 45 23 32 08-22-2012 0051 153 00 x15 153-PepperSt ;ImperialAv (WalnutAv E AC 2 ! 705 30 3 21150 59 28 30 42 08-22-2012 0052 156 0052x156 [Standard St ;Grand Av El Segundo Blvd E AC '. 2 ' 1,048 37 38,776 1 59 53 24 23 08 15-2012 0084 243 0084x243 (Acacia Av California St End E AC 2 667 30 20,010 60 0 44 56 08 21-2012 0086 254 1 0086x254 Sycamore Av ]Virginia St 'Main St E AC - 2 1,073 31 33,263 60 ; 16 52 32 08-21-2012 0002 2 0002x2 ;Apollo St =Rosecrans Ave !Park PI E AC 4 1,145 S2 59,540 61 f 69 18 13 08-23-2012 O 0053 159 3 0053x159 =Eucalyptus Or Mariposa Av End E I AC ' 2 317 37 11,729 61 63 36 1 08-15-2012 0015 51 0015x51 Franklin Ave Illinois St Kansas St E/s E AC 2 620 39 24,180 61 41 50 9 D8-16-2012 (D 0040 133 0040x133 lHillcrest St Pine Av lEnd E AC 2 714 28 19,992 61 34 66 0 08-15-2012 0065 205 ] 0065x205 Nevada St Pine Av lEnd E AC 2 224 32 8,418 61 j' 52 18 30 08 21-2012 z 0077 267 j 0077x267 Oak Av Hillcrest St Loma Vista St E AC j 2 849 30 25,470 ( 61 ' 17 42 41 ; 08-22-2012 O 0059 ! 181 1 0059x181 [Sierra St IGrand Av IEI Segundo Blvd E AC 2 1,109 33 ' 36,597 1 61 ' 13 47 40 : 08-22-2012 CA 0086 255 0086x255 Sycamore Av Pepper St ;Sheldon St E AC 2 1,125 31 34,875 61 j 15 34 51 08 22-2012 N PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 5 of 8 City of El Segundo, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets Sorted by Rank, PCI (0-100) DOSS [ 249 0085x249 jWaInutAv iCenter St lWashingtonSt j E AC 2 1,783 30 L', 53,490 1 61 11 37 I 52 08-21-2012 0055 163 I OOSSx163 ;Arena St Mariposa Av End E AC 2 321 28 8,988 62 20 37 43 08 22-2012 0063 195 0063x19S Bungalow Dr Maple Av Mariposa Av E AC 2 1,233 28 34,524 jl 62 48 51 1 08-17-2012 0061 i 185 0061x185 Lomita St Pine Av End E j AC _] 2 ) 298 28 8,344 62 45 1 46 9 08 16-2012 0058 177 00S8x177 (McCarthy Ct Imperial Av WalnutAv E AC 2 748 30 _ 22,440 62 37 1 63 1 0 08-17-2012 0077 270 0077x270 =Oak Av -Main St ,Sheldon St E AC 2 i 1,453 30 43,590 62 21 70 9 08-17-2012 0057 174 0057x174 ,Penn St ,Mariposa Av Pine Av ] E AC 2 I 495 30 14,850 62 22 27 51 08 22 2012 0085 244 0085x244 ]WalnutAv HillcrestSt lVirginia St E AC 2 1,682 30 50460 62 3 25 62 13 08-17-2012 0097 300 ' 0097x300 Binder PI Loma Vista St ;Whiting St E AC - 2 334 1 25 8,350 + 63 49 50 1 j 08-15-2012 0063 194 __ 0063x194 i Bungalow Dr 'WalnutAv maple Av i E AC 2 746 30 22,380 63 47 46 7 08-17-2012 0049 150 0049x150 Concord St 'Mariposa Av p Grand Av E AC 2 ' 1,673 30 50,190 63 46 ; 54 0 08-15-2012 0095 295 1 0095x295 IHolly Av Main StEucalyptus Dr E AC 2 729 30 21,870 63 35 65 0 08-15-2012 0061 184 0061x184 Lomita St Maple Av IMariposa Av E AC ' 2 1,234 33 _ 40,722 63 48 44 8 , 08-17-2012 0086 1 257 0086x257 Sycamore Av Center St ;Washington St E AC 2 ) 1,783 31 5S,273 63 27 63 10 08-28-2012 0084 s 241 0084x241 'Acacia Av Lomita St ;Center St E t AC 2 671 30 ! 20,130 64 1 0 65 3S 08-17-2012 0064 i 199 0064x199 California St limDerial Hwy Imperial Av E AC 2 810 33 j 26,730 64 40 ( 57 3 1 08-21-2012 0049 1 151 0049x151 :Concord St ,Grand Av El Segundo Blvd E i AC € 2 950 30 28,500 64 33 57 10 08-15-2012 0077 272 0077x272 Oak Av 'Center St lWashington St E AC 2 1,783 1 30 j 53,490 64 21 50 29 08-21-2012 0034 106 0034x106 _Richmond St Palm Ave IMariposa Ave E AC 2 562 35 19,970 # 64 43 44 13 08-17-2012 0053 161 0053x161 jEucalyptus Dr !Grand Av EI Segundo Blvd E ' AC 2 1,108 j 37 40,996 65 50 43 7 08-15-2012 0095 ) 294 - 0095x294 Holly Av ;Virginia St Main St E AC 2 1,075 30 1 32,250 65 29 71 0 08-15-2012 0061 183 0061x183 Lomita St Acacia Av Maple Av E AC) 2 1,179 33 38,907 65 38 54 8 08-17-2012 0028 264 0028x264 Maple Ave Virginia St [Hillcrest St E AC I 2 1,681 30 50,430 65 [ 39 53 8 08-17-2012 0057 173 0057x173 Penn St Maple Av 'Mariposa Av E AC 2 1,235 28 1 34,580 65 28 71 1 08 17-2012 0085 i 247 D085x247 Walnut Av Sheldon St McCarthy Ct E AC 2 758 1 30 22,740 65 17 71 12 1 08 17 2012 0085 248 0085x248 Walnut Av Maryland St )Center St E AC 2 797 30 23 910 611 5 0 39 61 08-21-2012 0068 214 0068x214 'Illinois Ct Mariposa Av jEnd E ( AC 2 267 32 9,794 66 43 31 I 26 j 08 21-2012 0041 136 0041x136 1 ;Loma Vista 5t IMariposa Av Grand Av I E AC G 2 1,700 28 i 47,600 66 33 55 12 08-15-2012 0062 192 0062x192 _Maryland St Pine Av ;Grand Av E ° AC ` 2 , 1,021 30 ( 30,630 66 37 52 11 08-16-2012 0077 j 268 0077x268 ;Oak Av ;Bayonne St ;Virginia St E AC 2 _ 561 30 16,830 66 i 0 51 49 08 22-2012 0047 147 ! 0047x147 Virginia St ;Mariposa Av ;Grand Av E AC 2 _ 1,698 30 50,940 66 35 56 ) 9 1 10-08-2015 0047 148 0047x148 ,Virginia St Grand Av �EI Segundo Blvd E AC 2 _ 927 30 27,810 j 66 41 59 0 10-OS-2015 0085 _ 245 _ 0085x245 3WalnutAv 'WalnutAv Virginia St jMain St E AC 2 1,075 1 30 32,250 66 32 59 9 68-17-2612 0085 250 0085x250 Washington St Sepulveda Blvd E AC 2 ) 820 30 24,600 66 16 31 1 53 08-21-2012 0053 157 , 0053x157 Eucalyptus Dr Imperial Av Maple Av E AC 2 1,405 37 _ 51,985 67 31 59 10 08-17-2012 0015 237 i 0015x237 Franklin Ave Loma Vista St City Limits E AC 2 144 39 = 5,616 67 0J735 1 ; 08-16-2012 cD 0057 _ 172 0057x172 Penn St Walnut Av Maple Av I E AC l 2 700 33 23,100 67 32 10 08-17-2012 0051 154 1 0051x154 (Pepper St Walnut Av 'Maple Ave j E AC 2 700 30 21,000 67 28 08-22-2012 CD 0059 ' 179 0059x179 ;Sierra St Maple Av !Mariposa Av E AC 1 2 1,235 30 37,050 167 45 54 1 ` 08 17-2012 0047 146 0047x146 :Virginia St Sycamore Av ,Mariposa Av E AC 2 1,561 30 46,830 67 ! 24 65 11 10-08-2015 z 0040 130 0040x130 ,HillcrestSt 'Imperial Av ISycamoreAv ! E I AC I 2 _ 1,057 ) 35 I 36,995 1 68 0 i 72 281 08-22-2012 O 0040 132 0040x132 _HillcrestSt Palm AV Pine Av E AC 2 1,031 1 35 36,085 68 33 53 14 08-15-2012 0028 263 _ 0028x263 'Maple Ave Main St Virginia St E AC 2 1,074 30 32 22068 28 62 10 08 17-2012 PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 6 of 8 City of El Segundo, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report -AU Streets Sorted by Rank, PCI (0-100) 0062 ` 189 I 0062x189 Maryland St !Walnut Av Maple E AC ] 2 746 33 _ 24,618 68 25 63 12 108-17-2012 0077 I 266 0077x266 Oak Av Hillcrest St End E AC 2 400 30 13,150 68 0 51 ( 49 08-22-2012 009-3 284 0093x284 Pine Av Hillcrest St 'End E AC 2 480 30 14,400 69 17 74 9 - ? 08-15-2012 0048 148 0048x148 'Concord PI Sycamore Av IMaple Av E AC f 2 350 16 5,600 70 22 4�2 36 ; 08-22-2012 0053 160 00S3x160 ;Eucalyptus Dr Mariposa Av Grand Av E AC 2 1,520 40 j 60,800 70 42 S2 6 08 15-2012 0095 293 1 0095x293 )Holly Av ;Valley St 'Virginia St E AC 2 998 30 29,940 71 23 67 10 1 08-15-2012 I62 188 0062x188 ,Maryland St -Walnut ;End E AC 2 1 161 26 4186 71 0 100 0 0817-2012 f_. 0058 178 _. 0058x178 _ McCarthyCt - _ WalnutAv _ !Lomita St E AC 2 1 701 _®... , 30 21,030 72 0 _ 99 1 D8172012 0077 1 271 - 0077x271 'Oak Av Sheldon St Penn St E AC 2 454 1 30 13,620 72 0 74 26 08-22-2012 0046 _ 142 0046x142 Whiting St 'Palm Av Mariposa Av E AC 2 534 30 16,020 72 40 59 1 ]08-15-2012 0053 158 0053x158 Eucalyptus Dr MapleAv (Oak Av E AC 2 351 37 12,987 73 31 69 0 ) 08-17-2012 0040 131 0040x131 Hillcrest St Sycamore Av Palm Av E AC ; 2 1,049 35 j 36,715 73 0 76 24 ) 08-22-2012 0046 j 143 0046x143 iWhiting St Mariposa Av Grand Av E (AC 2 1,699 30 50 970 73 35 __. 53 12 08-15-2012 0093 289 0093x289 ;Pine Av ;Nevada St jEnd E I AC 2 207 30 7,460 74 1 18 44 ( 38 1 08-21-2012 0062 190 0062x190 ,Maryland St ;Maple Av lMariposa Av E I AC 2 , 1,234 1 33 I 40,722 75 49 41 10 i 08-28-2012 0046 1 144 0046x144 Whiting St Grand Av AEI Segundo Blvd E AC 2 927 i 30 27,810 75 29 57 14 08-15-2012 0089 j 261 0089x261 Atwood Way ;Nash St Douglas ACC 2 1,359 25 33,975 ) 76 0 80 - 20 08-23-2012 0028 3 265 ) 0028x265 Maple Ave ;Hillcrest St f End E AC - 2 477 30 14,310 76 0 82 18 08-17-2012 0086 256 0086x256 Sycamore Av ;Sheldon St Penn St E AC 2 453 1 31 14,043 76 0 S 61 139 08-22-2012 0094 - 292 0094292 Valley St Pine Av €!End E AC 2 F 706 25 = 17,650 76 i 0 99 1 1 08-15-2012 008S I 246 0085x246 Walnut Av Main St `Sheldon St E AC j 2 1,434 30 43,020 76 17 67 1 16 08-17-2012 0089 262 0089x262 ;Atwood Way Douglas St )Nash St E AC 2 1,338 25 33,450 77 0 59 1 41 08-23-2012 0054 162 0054x162 ;Cypress St ',Imperial Av ,WalnutAv E _ AC 2 t 705 30 21,150 77 0 51 49 08-22-2012 006 1182 0060x182 !Sierra PI ;Pine Av :End E AC 2 378 35 14,380 ; 78 0 53 47 ; 08-22-2012 0088 260 0088x260 ;120th St :Aviation Blvd Hornet Way E AC 2 252 30 7,560 79 0 44 56 OS 23-2012 279 Hillcrestt End E AC _ 330 20 6,600 790092 0 100 0 08-15-2012 0077 269 0077x269 ;Oak Av Virginia St Main St E AC 2 1,074 30 32,220 79 j 0 i 5D 50 08-22-2012 0084 238 0084238 Acacia Av Hillcrest St !End E j AC - 2 749 30 22,470 ; 80 0 51 49 08-21-2012 0087 259 _ 0087x259 118th St Aviation Blvd Hornet Way E ; AC 2 2S2 j 30 7,560 81 0 33 67 08-23-2012 0086 252 OOS6x252 Sycamore Av ;HillcrestSt (End ------------ E AC 2 ? 643 31 21,183 85 0 71 29 08-21-2012 0083 - 235 0083x235 Park PI E - - Sepulveda Blvd JAIlied Way E AC - 2 1,023 45 ) 46,035 86 t 0 _ 55 45 08-23-2012 0028 227 0028x227 Maple Ave ;Parkview Dr N Douglas St E AC 1 2 630 30 18,900 86 0 j 71 29 08-28-2012 0064 i 303 ( 0064303 California St Imperial Av End E AC 2 132 34 4,488 j 87 0 52 48 = 08-21-2012 0044 140 I 0044140 ',Yucca St MapleAv !End j E AC 1 2 425 30 13,900 87 8 18 74 08-22-2012 0076 224 0076x224 'Campus Dr Nash St Parkview Dr S E AC 2 663 34 22,542 89 0 100 0 ; 08-28-2012 0076 225 0076x225 _Campus Dr Parkview Dr S Douglas St E ! AC 2 675 [ 34 22,950 89 0 ( 96 4 08-28-2012 0071 218 f 0071x218 _Parkview Dr N :Maple Av Atwood Way E AC 2 57S S1 29,478 91 0 64 36 08 23-2012 0042 138 0042x13S Dune St 'Acacia Av ;Sycamore Av i E AC 2 689 32 j 22,048 92 0 65 35 08 21-2012 CD 0028 226 0028x226 - 'Maple Ave ;Nash StParkview Dr N E AC 2 3 687 1 30 i 20,610 92 0 48 52 08-28-2012 0073 220 0073x220 Duley Rd 'Mariposa Av Grand Av E AC 2 1,399 25 30,778 93 0 59 ) 41 OS-23-2012 Z 0072 219 0072x219 jParkview Dr S !Campus Dr Mariposa Av E AC 1 2 , 474 , 33 15 642 93 0 71 29 08-23-2012 0043 139 _ 00 3 314 xx 9i Redwood Av Dune St End E AC [ 2 I 502 2 17,214 93 0 78 22 08-21-2012 0047 145 _ 0047x145 Virginia St Imperial Av - Sycamore Av - _ 1 E AC 2 1,055 30 31,650 100 0 0 j 0 10 08-2015 - PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 7 of 8 City of El Segundo, CA Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets Sorted by Rank, PCI (0-100) 0 (0, CD 3 CD .-f z O N PCI Climate, PCI Load and PCI Other values indicate the % of "distress type" found within section samples Page 8 of 8 Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo Page 1 2015 Pavement Management Program Final Report - December 2, 2015 Section IV SECTION IV FORECASTED MAINTENANCE REPORT A. Actual Budget, Five Year Plan (2016-2021) Agreement No. 6214 City of El Segundo 2015 Pavement Management Program Page 1 Final Report - December 2, 2015 Section IV FORECASTED MAINTENANCE REPORT Listed in chronological order by plan year then alphabetically by street name, this report presents the year and action corresponding to the next scheduled work activity for each segment within the pavement network. ACTUAL BUDGET — The Actual budget was generated for the City to demonstrate how the limited $745 / yr budget allocation performs against the current citywide conditions, City's Actual budget includes: • 2016-17 - $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k 0 2017-18 - $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k • 2018-19 - $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k • 2019-20 - $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k e 2020-21- $450k (Gas Tax); $175k (Measure R); $120k Prop. C, Totaling $745k We have sorted the following report by functional class (rank) for easy review (Arterial — Local, A to Z order). City of El Segundo, CA Sorted by Rank, FY, Name Order (A to Z) Forecasted Maintenance Report - FY 2016-2021 RAIN Arterials / Collectors [ 2016-17 0023 i 74 002304 :Imperial Ave !Center St ?California St C AC 2 1 910 40 ( 36,400 42 AC Overlay $97,916 2016 17 _ 0023 75 0023x75 ;Imperial Ave Sheldon St Center St C AC 2 ` 1,935 40 77,400 59 AC Over = $208,206 ! $306,122 - - 2017 18 0020 -f- 69 0020x69 - - Hughes Way EB i- ;Allied Way East End B AC 3 820 37 1 31,090 38 AC Overlay $86,119 2017 18 _ 0030 93 0030x93 IMariposa Ave EB Nash St Douglas St B [ AC i 4 1,075 ) 32 34,400 48 AC Overlay $95,288 2017-18 1 0030 94 003Ox94 1 Mariposa Ave EB 97' W/of Douglas St [Douglas St B PCC 3 97 31 2,959 32 PCC Repair $12,500 2017 18 0031 95 0031x95 Mariposa Ave WB Douglas St W/s =Nash St E/s B ] AC 2 1,150 32 I 36,800 41 AC Overlay $101,936 ... _ ..... _. _ e 7 i $295,843 2018 19 0013 [ 34 001304 IN Segundo BI EB !Nash St 1225' W/Douglas St A AC 3 1,277 36 46,722 29 AC Overlay $133,1SB 2018-19 0036 '' 111 0036x111 !Selby St lWalnut Ave C I AC 2 ! 610 33 1 20,130 35 AC Overlay $S7,371 2018 19 0067 2D9 0067x209 _Washington St -MapleAv =Mariposa Av B AC 2 3 1,234 32 39,488 43 AC Overlay $112,541 $303,069 2019 20 0013 36 0013x36 EI Segundo BI EB 160' E/Aviation BI Isis Ave A AC 3 1,212 46 59,252 - 54 AC Overlay $17 0 _ 2019 20 0013 1 37 0013x37 El Segundo BI EB Douglas St :225' E/Aviation BI A AC 3 1,405 46 - 64,630 41 AC Overlay $190,012 $364,213 2020-21 0009 ! 18 0009x18 'Douglas St [Rosecrans Ave !Park PI C ) AC 4 841 62 1 56,542 46 AC Overlay $171,322 2020-21 0014 ) 42 0014x42 El Segundo BI WB Isis Ave 105' E/Aviation BI A AC 3 1,212 39 55,268 45 AC Overlay $167,462 I - i - $338,784 Locals 2016 17 0084 241 ! 0084x241 Acacia Av 1Lomita St Center St E AC 2 671 30 - 20,130 64 ®......... Type II Slurry _ e®.... ..... ... $4,831 2016 17 I 0084 _ 242 0084x242 Acacia Av Center St California St E AC 2 - 909 30 27,270 55 Type II Slurry $6,545 2016 17 0084 [ 243 0084x243 Acacia Av California St End E AC I 2 667 30 20,010 60 Type II Slurry ! $4,802 2016-17 0063 1 194 . 0063x194 Bungalow Dr J Walnut Av Maple Av E AC 2 746 30 _ 22,380 63 Type II Slurry ; $5,371 2016-17 0063 195 0063x195 Bungalow Dr Maple Av IMariposa Av E AC 2 1,233 28 34,524 62 Type II Slurry $8,286 2016-17 0064 199 0064x199 California St ( Imperial Hwy EImperial Av ( E C AC 2 810 ! 33 J 26,730 64 Type II Slurry y $6,415 = 2016-17 0064 ! 200 0064x200 California St jEnd Walnut Av [ E AC 2 _ 1,418 34 48,212 42 AC Overlay $103,656 2016-17 0064 a 201 0064x201 _California St IMaple Av !Mariposa Av ! E AC 2 1,234 j 33 40,722 59 Type II Slurry $9,773 2016-17 0064 ; 303 0064x303 ,California St Imperial Av _ 'End E _ AC 2 1 132 34 4,488 87 Type II Slurry $1,077 2016 17 333 0092 j 280 0092x280 lElm Av =California St !Washington St E AC 2 935 30 28,050 50 Cape Seal $23,562 2016 17 0069 216 0069x216 !Indiana Ct Maple Av End E AC 2 417 ! 32 14,594 39 AC Overlay $31,377 2016 17 0090 273 _ 009Ox273 IN Irene Ct ;Penn St ;End E ' AC 2 1288 1 23 = 7,774 57 Type II Slurry $1,866 2016 17 0061 183 D061x183 !Lomita St 3Acacia Av !Maple Av E AC ? 2 1,179 33 38,907 ! 65 ] Type II Slurry $9,338 2016-17 1 0061 184 0061x184 !Lomita St Maple Av Mariposa Av E AC 2 ( 1,234 33 40,722 63 Type ll Slurry $9,773 2016-17 0062 188 0062x18S Maryland 5t y Walnut Av End E AC 2 161 26 4,186 71 T ell Slurr YP Y $1,005 2016-17 0062 j 189 1 0062x189 Maryland St Walnut Av I Maple Av E AC 2 746 33 - 24,618 68 Type II Slurry ' $5,908 2016-17 0062 _ 190 0062x190 Maryland St Maple Av I Mariposa Av E AC i 2 1,234 33 40,722 1 75 Type II Slurry i $9,773 2016-17 11 0058 - 177 0055x177 McCarthy Ct I Imperial Av lwalnut Av [ E AC 2 748 30 11 22,440 62 Type II Slurry 1 $5,386 2016-17 0058 178 0058x178 jMcCarthy Ct I Walnut Av Lomita St E AC 2 701 ! 30 ' 21,030 3 72 1 Type II Slurry S5,047 2016-17 0077 ] 271 0077x271 [Oak Av Sheldon St Penn St E _ AC 2 I 454 ! 30 13,6201 72 Type II Slurry $3,269 2016-17 0077 272 0077x272 ;Oak Av -Center St ;Washington St E AC 2 1,783 30 53,490 64 Type II Slurry $12,838 Page 1 of S 0 i (Q CD z O N City of El Segundo, CA - Sorted by Rank, FY, Name Order (A to Z) Forecasted Maintenance Report - FV 2016-2021 2016-17 0091 277 0091x277 :Palm Av ;Sheldon St lCenter St E I AC 2 1,933 30 57,990 47 Cape Seal48,7zZ 2016-17 0091 , 278 0091x278 'Palm Av !California St Sepulveda Blvd E AC 2 - 1,755 30 52,650 51 Cape Seal $4,a26 201617 0057 j 172 0057x172 ,Penn St ,WalnutAv Maple Av E AC 1 2 700 : 33 23,100 67 ( Type llSlurry $5,544 2016-17 0057 173 0057x173 Penn St ;Maple Av Mariposa Av E I AC 2 _ 1,235 28 34,580 65 Type II Slurry $8,299 2016 17 0059 179 0059x179 :Sierra St ;Maple Av ;Mariposa Av E I AC 2 1,235 30 I 37,050 67 Type II Slurry $8,892 2016 17 0086 257 0086x2S7 Sycamore Av iCenter St ,Washington St E i AC 2 1,783 31 _ 55,273 € 63 Type II Slurry $13,266 2016 17 0086 258 0086x258 Sycamore Av Washington St !Sepulveda Blvd E ' AC , 2 819 31 25,389 56 Type II Slurry $6,093 2016 17 0085 ) 247 0085x247 WalnutAv Sheldon St McCarthy Ct E AC , 2 758 30 22,740 65 Type II Slurry $5,458 201617 0085 I, 248 0085x248 ;WalnutAv ;Maryland St Center St E AC 2 797 30 23,910 65 -- Type llSlurry $5,738 2016 17 I 0085 249 _ 0085x249 Walnut Av Center St Washington St E AC 2 1,783 30 _ 53,490 61 Type II Slurry $12,838 2016-17 0085 250 0085x250 Walnut Av Washington St [Sepulveda Blvd E AC 1 2 820 30 24,600 66 Type II Slurry $5,904 $434,867 2017-18 0087 259 0087x2S9 118th St Aviation Blvd 'Hornet Way E AC 2 252 30 7,560 81 Type II Slurry $1,890 2017-18 0088 260 0088x260 1120th St (Aviation Blvd Hornet Way E AC 2 252 30 7,560 j 79 Type II Slurry $1,890 2017-18 0082 234 0082x234 Allied Way ;Hughes Way 1E Park PI E AC p 2 1,684 45 75,780 f 28 AC Overlay $167,474 j 2017-18 _ 0002 2 0002x2 (Apollo St 'Rosecrans Ave Park PI j E AC 4 1,145 52 59,540 61 Type II Slurry $14,885 j 2017 18 0089 261 0089x261 jAtwood Way ,Nash St 'Douglas St E ; AC _ 2 1,359 , 25 33,975 76 Type II Slurry $8,494 2017 18 = 0089 262 0089x262 ;Atwood Way !Douglas St 'Nash St E - AC 2 - 1,338 25 33,450 77 Type II Slurry $8,363 2017-18 ; 0076 224 0076x224 Campus Dr Nash St 'Parkview Dr S E AC I 2 663 34 22,542 89 Type II Slurry $5,636 j 2017-18 0076 225 0076x225 !Campus Dr Parkview Dr S JDouglas St E ; AC 2 675 34 22,950 89 Type II Slurry $ 35 77 8 2017 18 0073 220 0073x220 =Duley Rd Mariposa Av Grand Av E AC 2 1,399 25 30,778 93 Type II Slurry $7,695 2017 18 0042 138 0042x138 Dune St lAcacia Av Sycamore Av AC , 2 689 32 2 8 92 Type II Slurry $5,512 2017-18 0083 235 0083x235 Park PI E !Sepulveda Blvd Allied Way 4EAC �114 1,023 45 46,035 86 Type II Slurry $11,509 2017 1S 0019 68 0019x68 Hawaii St Aviation BI Alaska Ave 1,45D 46 66,700 15 AC Level/Overlay $153,410 2017-18 0068 214 0068x214 Illinois Ct Mariposa Av l End E AC 2 267 32 9,794 1 66 Type II Slurry 3 $2,449 , 2017-18 0023 1 78 0023x78 Imperial Ave West End +Hillcrest St E AC 2 670 30 j 21,600 35 Al Cape Seal $18,792 2017 18 0028 226 0028x226 Maple Ave Nash St :Parkview Dr IN E AC 2 687 30 20,610 92 Type II Slurry $5,153 2017-18 0028 227 0028x227 ,Maple Ave Parkview Dr N Douglas St E !_ AC 2 630 30 18,900 86 Type II Slurry $4,725 2017-18 0071 218 0071x218 Parkview Dr N ImapleAv Atwood Way E AC 2 578 j 51 29,478 91 Type II Slurry $7,370 2017 18 0072 219 0072x219 Parkview Dr S ',Campus Dr Imariposa Av ' E AC 2 1 474 33 15,642 ! 93 Type II Slurry $3,911 2017-18 0086 256 0086x256 :Sycamore Av ;Sheldon St ;Penn St E _ AC + 2 [ 453 31 14,043 76 Type II Slurry $3,511 2017-18 0085 251 008Sx251 'WalnutAv 'Sepulveda Blvd ISelby St E _ AC 2 643 3 30 19,290 45 Cape Seal j $16,782 2017 18 0067 '_: 208 0067x208 lWashington St iWalnut Av Maple Av j E I AC 2 748 32 23,936 54 Type 11 Slurry $5,984 i $461,168 2018-19 0063 ! 196 0063x196 ,Bungalow Dr Pine Av 'End E AC 2 251 30 8,780 52 Cape Seal $7,814 2018-19 0063 197 0063x197 _Bungalow Dr !Pine Av ;_Grand Av E AC 2 1,021 30 30,630 51 ( Cape Seal $27,261 2015 19 0063 198 0063x198 ;Bungalow Dr ElseV PI JEI Segundo Blvd E AC , 2 299 33 ' 9,867 1 66 Type II Slurry $2,516 2018-19 0064 202 0064x202 ,California St Mariposa Av Holly Av = E ! AC 1 2 999 32 31,968 T 35 Cape Seal $28,452 2018-19 0064 203 0064x203 ;California St ;Grand Av Franklin Av E AC 2 ) 560 3S 21,280 61 Type II Slurry $5,426 2018-19 ; 0098 301 0098x301 _Elsey PI Bungalow Dr !Center St E j AC I 2 265 32 8,480 58 Type II Slurry $2,162 2018 19 0015 51 0015x51 IFranklin Ave Illinois St 'Kansas St E/s ! E AC 2 620 39 24,180 68 Type II Slurry I yp y $6,166 2018 19 0015 52 i 0015x52 I Franklin Ave =Kansas St E/s Center St E/s E AC 2 1,320 39 51,480 SS Type II Slurry ? $13,127 2018 19 0015 53 0015x53 !Franklin Ave Center St E/s Sheldon St E/s AC ! 2 1,946 30 SS,380 56 ! Type II Slurry ; $14,887 Page 2 of S 0 i City of El Segundo, CA Sorted by Rank, FY, Name Order (A to Z) Forecasted Maintenance Report - Fy 2016-2021 2018 19 0095 296 0095x296 ;Holly AV Penn St ILomita St E AC 2 i 700 30 21,000 ( 55 Cape Seal $18,690 2018 19 0095 t 297 0095x297 Holly AV Maryland St ;Center St EAC 2 531 30 15,930 66 Cape Seal $14,178 2018-19 0095 j' 298 0095x298 ;Holly AV ;California St Sepulveda Blvd E AC 2 1,617 30 I 48,510 54 Cape Seal $43,174 2018-19 0070 217 0070x217 ;Indiana St IMariposa Av Grand Av E AC ' 2 1,519 1 32 48,608 55 Cape Seal $43,261 2018-19 0061 _ 185 0061x185 Lomita St Pine Av End E AC 2 298 28 ! 8,344 69 Type II Slurry $2,128 2018-19 0061 186 0061x186 Lomita St Pine AV IGrand AV E € AC 2 1,019 28 28,532 64 Type II Slurry $7,276 2018 19 0061 187 0061x187 Lomita St lGrand AV El Segundo Blvd E AC 2 1,111 28 31,108 56 Type II Slurry $7,933 2018 19 0062 191 0062x191 Maryland St Pine AV End E AC 2 324 28 9,072 i 64 Type II Slurry $2,313 2018 19 0062 ; 192 0062x192 Maryland St Pine AV Grand AV _ E AC ( 2 ! 1,021 30 j 30,630 72 Type II Slurry $7,811 2018-19 0062 193 0062x193 IMaryland St ]Grand AV !El Segundo Blvd E AC 2 ] 1,109 30 33,270 62 T ype 11 Slurry $8,484 2018 19 0065 i 204 0065x204 ;Nevada St Mariposa AV Pine AV E AC 2 ! 500 32 ( 16,000 65 Type II Slurry $4,080 2018 19 0065 205 0065x205 Nevada St ;Pine AV :End E AC 1 2 224 32 I 8,418 68 Type II Slurry $2,147 2018 19 0065 212 _ 0065x212 Nevada St Grand AV jEl Segundo Blvd E ? AC 1 2 j 1,109 32 35,488 5S Cape Seal $31,584 2018 19 0066 j 206 0066x206 10regon St ;Mariposa AV lPine AV E I AC 3 2 499 32 ! 15,968 63 Type II Slurry $4,072 2018 19 006 0 0066x207 ;Oregon St ,Pine AV JEnd E AC 2 369 32 11,808 1 59 Type II Slurry $3,011 2018 19 1 0066 213 I 0066x213 Oregon St Grand AV EI Segundo Blvd E AC 2 F 11108 32 ! 35,456 55 Type II Slurry $9,041 2018 19 0057 174 0057x174 Penn St Mariposa AV ,Pine AV j, E j AC I 2 495 30 14,850 69 II Slurry $3,787 2018-19 0057 175 ( 0057x175 j Penn St Holly AV 'Grand AV E AC 2 1 519 30 j 15,570 35 ___Type i Cape Seal j $13,857 2018-19 0057 _ 176 0057x176 Penn St ,Grand Av EI Segundo Blvd E AC 2 1,110 38 42,180 66 Type II Slurry $10,756 j 2018-19 0093 288 0093x288 ;Pine AV [Sheldon St Center St ' E I AC 2 1,932 , 30 57,960 62 Type 11 Slurry $14,780 2018-19 0093 ! 289 j 0093x289 jPine AV :Nevada St =End i E 1 AC 2 207 30 7,460 81 Type II Slurry $1,9D2 2018 19 - 0093 j - 290 j 0093x290 IPine AV lNevada St _ -- ?Washington St E AC 2 ! 1,313 - 30 39,390 39 Cape Seal $35,057 2018 19 0093 291 0093x291 _Pine AV Illinois St Indiana St E AC 2 328 1 30 9,840 58 Cape Seal $8,758 2018 19 E 0056 169 "_" 0056x169 !Sheldon St ;Pine AV !End ( E AC 1 2 ( 277 27 _ 7,479 63 Type II Slurry I $1,907 2018-19 0060 182 0060x182 ,Sierra PI Pine AV !End E , AC 2 _ 378 35 14,380 84 Type II Slurry $3,667 2018-19 0059 _ . 180 _ 0059x180 Sierra St Pine AV Grand AV j E I AC - 2 - 1,020 33 - 33,660 64 ... .. Type II Slurry $8,583 2018-19 F 0059 181 0059x181 ,Sierra St ,Grand AV JEI Segundo Blvd E AC - 2 11109 33 3 36,597 68 Type II Slurry $9,332 $429,379 2019-20 i 0084 ` 238 0084x238 Acacia Av iHillcrestSt lEnd E AC 2 749 30 22,470 1 85 Type 11 Slurry $5,842 2019-20 j 0084 240 0084x240 IAcacia Av jPepperst Cypress St E AC j 2 853 30 25,590 64 Type II Slurry $6,653 2019-20 0055 163 0055x163 Arena St Mariposa AV End f E AC 2 321 28 8,988 3 67 Type II Slurry $2,337 2019-20 0055 164 0055x164 Arena St Mariposa AV 1Pine AV E 1 AC 2 1 469 28 13,132 39 j Cape Seal $12,081 2019-20 0055 165 0055x165 (Arena St (Grand AV EI Segundo Blvd E AC 2 1,109 38 42,142 64 ( Type II Slurry $10,957 2019-20 j 0097 300 a 0097000 Binder PI i Loma Vista St lWhiting St E AC 2 ! 334 ! 25 8,350 70 Type II Slurry $2,171 2019-20 0050 151 0050x151 CCedarSt (Imperial AV WalnutAv E ! AC 2 ! 705 1 30 21,150 63 Type II Slurry $5,499 2019-20 0048 148 0048x148 !Concord PI ;Sycamore AV Maple Av i E AC 2 ' 350 ' 16 5,600 77 Type II Slurry $1,456 6 2019 20 0049 ! 150 0049x150 Concord St ;Mariposa AV lGrand AV , E 1 AC 1 2 1,673 30 50,190 70 Type II Slurry $13,049 2019 20 0049 151 0049x151 !Concord St ;Grand AV IN Segundo Blvd E ! AC 2 j 950 30 28,500 71 Type II Slurry $7,410 2019 20 0054 3 162 0054x162 ]Cypress St Imperial AV !Walnut AV E I AC 2 _ 705 30 21,150 84 ; Type II Slurry $5,499 2019 20 0092 279 0092x279 'Elm AV HillcrestSt jEnd E AC 2 330 20 6,600 85 Type II Slurry $1,716 2019-20 ! 0015 236 0015x236 ;Franklin Ave ;Main St Loma Vista St E AC 2 1,760 39 68,640 65 Type II Slurry - $17,846 j 2019 20 0015 237 0015x237 ;Franklin Ave !Loma Vista St ;City Limits E _ AC 2 i 144 39 5,616 74 Type II Slurry $1,460 2019 20 , 0040 130 0040x130 1HiIIcrest St Imperial AV ;Sycamore AV E AC 2 ( 1,057 35 36,995 75 Type II Slurry $9,619 Page 3 of 5 0 i City of El Segundo, CA Sorted by Rank, FY, Name Order (A to Z) Forecasted Maintenance Report - FY 2016-2021 . 2019-20 0040 131 1 0040x131 lHillcrestSt iSycamore AV ;Palm AV E F AC 2 i 1,049 35 36,715 i 80 Type II Slurry $9,546 2019-20 0040 132 0040x132 Hillcrest St Palm AV Pine Av E _ AC 2 1,031 35 36,085 75 Type II Slurry $9,382 2019-20 0040 133 0040x133 ;Hillcrest St s'Pine AV lEnd E I AC 2 714 28 19,992 68 Type II Slurry $5,195 2019-20 009S v j 293 0095x293 [Holly AV Valley St 'Virginia St E AC 2 i 998 30 29,940 78 Type II Slurry $7,784 2019 20 0095 294 0095x294 ;Holly AV Virginia St ;Main St E AC 2 1,075 30 32,250 72 Type II Slurry $8,385 2019 20 0095 295 = 0095x295 `Holly AV =Main St Eucalyptus Dr E AC 2 j 729 30 21,870 70 Type II Slurry $5,686 2019-20 0041 137 0041x137 _Loma Vista St _Grand AV !Binder PI E i AC 1 2 753 28 ' 21,084 ( 64 Type II Slurry $5,482 2019-20 0028 263 0028x263 !Maple Ave Main St Virginia St E AC 2 1,074 30 - 32,220 75 Type II Slurry $8,377 2019 20 0028 264 0028x264 Maple Ave Virginia St I Hillcrest St E AC 2 1,681 30 50,43) 72 Type II Slurry $13,112 2019-20 0025 265 0028x265 Maple Ave Hillcrest St [End I E AC 2 477 30 14,310 81 Type llSlurry $3,721 2019-20 0077 266 0077x266 Oak AV Hillcrest St [End E i AC 2 400 30 j 13,150 75 Type II Slurry__]_$3,419 2019-20 0077 267 0077x267 :Oak AV Hillcrest St !Loma Vista St E AC 2 _ 849 30 25,470 68 Type II Slurry $6,622 2019 20 0077 268 ( 0077x268 [Oak AV [Bayonne St Virginia St E AC ! 2 _ 561 30 16,830 j 73 Type II Slurry $4,376 2019 20 0077 I 269 0077x269 Oak Av Virginia St Main St E AC 2 It 074 30 32,220 84 Type II Slurry $8,377 2019 20 0077 j 270 0077x270 Oak AV Main St ,Sheldon St E I AC 2 1,453 ? 36 43,590 69 Type II Slurry $11,333 2019 20 t 0091 274 _ 0091x274 ;Palm AV Hillcrest St lEnd E AC 1 2 [ 339 30 10,170 58 Type II Slurry $2,644 2019-20 0091 275 0091x275 FPalm AV Hillcrest St !Virginia St B E AC ` 2 1,681 30 i 50,430 S8 Type II Slurry ; $13,112 2019-20 0051 1 153 0051x153 jPepperSt Imperial AV WalnutAv E AC z 2 705 30 21,150 66 Type llSlurry $5,499 2019-20 0051 154 OOS1x154 Pepper St Walnut AV Maple Ave E AC 3 2 700 30 1 21,000 74 Type II Slurry $5,460 2019-20 0093 284 0093.284 Pine AV Hillcrest St lEnd E AC 2 l 480 30 14,400 76 Type II Slurry $3,744 2019 20 0093 ] 285 0093x285 (Pine Av Hillcrest St Virginia St E AC 2 1,329 [ 30 j 39,870 65 Type II Slurry $10,366 2019 20 0093 286 0093x286 ;Pine AV Virginia St Imain St E AC 2 1,076 30 32,280 48 Cape Seal ! $29,698 2019-20 0052 155 0052x155 !Standard St ;Mariposa AV :Grand AV E AC 2 _ 1,580 37 58,460 65 i Type II Slurry $15,200 2019-20 0052 156 0052.156 IStand.,d St ,.Grand AV =EI Segundo Blvd j E AC 2 1,048 37 38,776 66 Type II Slurry $10,082 i 2019 20 0086 253 0086x253 ;Sycamore AV ,Hillcrest St Virginia St E AC 2 j 1,681 31 52,111 64 Type II Slurry $13,549 2019 20 [ 0086 254 ® 0086x254 ... Sycamore AV Virginia St ,Main St E AC - 2 1 073 _ 31 33,263 67 Type II Slurry $8,648 2019-20 0086 255 0086x255 !Sycamore AV ;Pepper St !Sheldon St E [ AC 2 1,125 31 I', 34,875 68 Type II Slurry $9,068 2019 20 0094 292 0094292 _Valley St !Pine AV !End E AC • 2 706 25 17,650 80 Type II Slurry $4,589 2019 20 0085 1 244 1 0085x244 1 Walnut AV lHillcrest St !Virginia St E j AC 3 2 j 50,460 68 Type 11 Slurry $13.120 2019 20 0085 245 OOSSx245 !WalnutAv Virmia St g'2019-20 Main St E AC 2 �1,�23 32,250 73 Type II Slurry $8,385 0085 246 0085x246 Walnut Av Main St Sheldon St E AC I 2 , 43,020 83 Type II Slurry $11,185 2019-20 1 0046 _ 142 0046x142 Whiting St IPalm AV Mariposa AV E AC 2 534 30 16,020 79 Type II Slurry $4,165 2019-20 1 0046 143 0046x143 Whiting St I Mariposa AV Grand AV E AC I 2 1,699 j 30 50,970 79 Type II Slurry $13,252 2019-20 0046 1 Grand AV El Segundo Blvd [ E t AC 2 j, 927 30 27,810 [ 81 Type II Slurry $7,231 $403,393 2020-21 00B 1239 8239 004x `Acacia AV Hillcrest St ;Cedar St E ' AC 2 2,449 30 ! 73,470 SS Cap e Seal $69,797 2020-21 ! 0084 241 0084x241 (Acacia AV Lomita St !Center St E AC 2 671 30 20,130 68 Type II Slurry $5,435 2020 21 0084 242 0084x242 Acacia Av Center St California St E AC ( 2 909 30 27,270 62 Type II Slurry $7,363 2020-21 0084 243 0084x243 'Acacia AV California St End E AC 2 667 30 20,010 65 Type II Slurry 1 $5,403 202021 0045 j 141 0045x141 ;Bayonne St MapleAv Palm AV E j AC € 2 699 30 20,970 54 Cape Seal $19,922 2020 21 0063 194 0063x194 Bungalow Dr Walnut AV =Maple Av E AC 2 - 746 30 1 22,380 67 Type II Slurry $6,043 2020 21 0063 195 0063x195 1Bungalow Dr Maple AV ;Mariposa AV E AC ' 2 = 1,233 1 28 - 34,524 66 Type II Slurry $9,321 2020-21 0064 199 0064199 =California St ,Imperial Hwy Imperial AV E AC 2 1 810 33 26,730 68 Type II Slurry $7,217 Page 4 of 5 0 i (Q (D (D 3 (D z O d7 N City of El Segundo, CA Sorted by Rank, FY, Name Order (A to Z) Forecasted Maintenance Report - FY 2016-2021 p e a. 2020 21 0064 201 0064x201 lCalifornia St Maple Av ;Mariposa Av E AC 217 _ 1,234 33 40,722 63 1 Type II Slurry $1 99995 2020 21 0064 303 0064x303 California St Imperial Av End E AC l 2 132 34 4,488 87 Type II Slurry $1,212 2020-21 0092 '_ 280 0092x280 :Elm Av :California St Washington St E AC 2 935 30 _ 28,050 SS Type II Slurry $7,574 2020-21 0053 157 _ 0053x157 IlEucayptus Dr Imperial Av ;Maple Av ; E I AC 2 3 1,405 37 51,985 74 1 Type II Slurry $14,036 2020 21 0053 158 - 0053x1S8 _Eucalyptus Dr _Maple Av Oak Av E I AC 2 j 351 37 12,987 1 80 Type II Slurry $3,506 2020-21 0053 ' 159 0053x159 'Eucalyptus Dr ±Mariposa Av End E I AC 2 317 37 11,729 68 Type II Slurry $3,167 2020 21 , 0053 160 0053x160 ]Eucalyptus Dr ]Mariposa Av Grand Av E AC ; 2 1,520 40 3 60,800 77 Type II Slurry $16,416 2020-21 0053 161 0053x161 Eucalyptus Dr Grand Av El Segundo Blvd E AC 2 1,108 37 40,996 72 Type II Slurry ; $11,069 2020-21 O015 54 0015x54 Franklin Ave [Sheldon St IMain St E AC 2 1,435 C 30 I 43,050 57 Cape Seal $40 S9S98 2020-21 0041 134 0041x134 Loma Vista St Imperial Av Sycamore Av E 6s AC 2 1,055 28 i 29,540 58 1 Type II Slurry $7,976 2020 21 0041 135 0041x135 (Loma Vista StSycamore Av ;Mariposa Av E AC 2 '. 1,582 28 44,296 65 1 Type II Slurry I $11,960 2020 21 0041 3 136 0041x136 ,Loma Vista St Mariposa Av Grand Av E _ AC �, 2 1 700 28 ; 47,600 1 73 Type II Slurry i $12,852 2020-21 0091 j 276 0091x276 -Palm Av Virginia St ?Main St E AC 2 1,075 30 32,250 i 50 Cape Seal $30,638 2020 21 0093 287 0093x287 jPine Av Main St ?Sheldon St E AC I 2 ; 1,434 30 43,020 52 Cape Seal $40,869 2020 21 0034 ! 105 0034105 lRichmond St El Segundo BI Grand Ave S/s ( E AC 2 90S 1 39 i 34,827 65 Type II Slurry $9,403 2020 21 ' 0034 106 0034x106 ;Richmond St Palm Ave Mariposa Ave E AC 2 1 562 ; 35 19,970 71 Type II Slurry $5,392 2020 21 0034 121 0034x121 ;Richmond St Grand Ave ±Mariposa Ave I E ; AC 2 j 1,630 39 1 63,070 , 60 Type II Slurry $17,029 2020 21, 0047 146 0047x146 (Virginia St ',Sycamore Av I Mariposa Av E AC 2 1,561 30 46,830 [ 67 Type II Slurry $12,644 2020-21 0047 147 0047x147 Virginia St Mariposa Av Grand Av E AC 2 1,698 30 50,940 66 j Type II Slurry $13,754 2020 21 0047 , 148 0047x148 Virginia St Grand Av I El Segundo Blvd E AC 1 2 927 30 27,510 66 Type II Slurry $7,509 2020 21 0044 140 0044x140 Yucca St Maple Av End ( E AC 2 425 30 13,900 92 Type II Slurry $3,753 I - $413,150 0 Page 5 of 5 Agreement No. 6214 APPENDIX D PARKING LOT LIST AND MAPS Agreement No. 6214 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PARKING LOT LIST Name Location Total Area SF) 1 Library lot Southwest corner of Main St. and Mariposa Ave. 12,757 2 Public parking lot North of 410 Main St 5,956 City vehicle parking lot 350 Main St 6,188 _L 4 Police Department 300 block of Standard 14,508 5 Fire Station 1 314 Main St 22,942 6 Public parking lot Northeast corner of Franklin Ave. and Richmond St. 15,818 7 City personnel parking lot SEC Standard & Holly 11,290 8 9 Parkin lot Parking area South side of Rec Park Northwest corner of Grand Ave. and Eucalyptus Dr. 339 Sheldon 6,583 44,651 10 North side of Rec Park Guaymas Way 46,600 11 Water Department Yard 400 Lomita Street 26,597 12 Water Department reservoir Maryland St 28,759 13 City Yard 150 Illinois St 82,490 14 The Lakes Golf Course 400 S Sepulveda 80,168 15 Campus El Segundo Athletic Fields ar ing Southeast corner of Campus Dr. and Parkview Dr. 38,071 16 Fire Station 2 2261 E Mariposa Ave 17,156 0 At 1S ONV-1MJVW is VlIWOI r IL Na�L r 'O L is ONVIAl JVW is VlIWOI L r 16 r O- iS Vbb31S 0 Id VH1 :91S 1S V2:b31S w a J is NN3d = m w 1S NN3d 1S NN3d z cc 7 � z Q r Y LL L m as 1S NOO13HS ul Q 0 1S NOO13HS f Co w a z O _ Q w a) a U ca a- w N � 1S VN3bV N 1S VN32iV 0) d C O 0 2JO snId kivon3 w Y � Q UY L w z m a a o0 1S (RIVONViS +a N O a) LL 0 d o C Y L v t v 'Oiw ;' O o Ln tm Q - ; i i a C +•+ v •— - W- Q. r M 1S NIVW ® Y w O _ U CL ,a tm a M LC) O m a a Wall _v a J ! IZ 4.0 z � O V _ 1S ONMHOIb < C CD 3 a r L O a v z Y N Q � C U)a a� �m N ii CD m 3 os sndnvoLL U L Id mil 1. m os sndwvo o W O W W 0 D :)z Q. aO w U UU is I2Aod2Jly l w Q a 0 0- Of Q w is SvlonOa N are AMna 1S HSVN N CONTINENTAL BLVD anl8 Va3Aind3S N w iS VNVIaNI VNVIaNI O x z w w .....,,�..w'.u.�.N.�, .,.....___.,.v....... d w w w Q Q w Q 2 ¢ } Bw_ 0 w z 9 w w a LU w a 0 z Q C7 w w a 0 z (7 w is svionoa s 0 J c0 0 0 z Z) cD w CD J w w ame Va3nlnd3S s a� a� LL 0 0 CL c 0 L O U o0 U Lo Agreement No. 6214 APPENDIX EL SEGUNDO PARKS AND OPEN SPACES Agreement No. 6214 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PARKS Approximate Name Location Area (SF) 1 Acacia Park 600 block of W. Acacia Ave, 23,189 100 Block of Whiting St., north of 2 Candy Cane Park Binder PI. 5,761 Southeast corner of W. Holly Ave at 3 Holly Valley Park Valley St. 7,584 4 Campus El Segundo Athletic Field 2201 E. Mariposa Ave. 209,375 Imperial Ave. Strip and Memory Imperial Ave. between Hillcrest Ave. 5 Tree Row and Center St. 669,907 E. Imperial Ave between Cypress St. 6 Clutter's Park and Sheldon St. 754 E. Imperial Ave. at McCarthy Ct., 7 JE1 Segundo Dog Park between Sheldon St. and Center St. 78,002 Washington St. between Walnut 8 1 Independence Park Ave. and Sycamore Ave. 44,008 Washington St. between Sycamore 9 Constitution Park St. and Maple Ave. 44,737 Washington St. between Maple Ave. 10 Washington Park and Mariposa Ave. 187,136 Illinois St. between Mariposa Ave. 11 Freedom Park and Holly Ave. 131,428 Northwest corner of Maryland St. and 12 1 Hilltop Park Grand Ave. 89,896 13 Camp Eucalyptus 641 California St. 16,551 Northwest corner of Kansas St. and 14 Kansas Park Hollv Ave. 18,453 600 Block of Main St., between Palm 15 1 Library Park Ave. and Mariposa Ave. 108,557 The Plunge - Urho Saari Swim 16 Stadium 219 W. Mariposa Ave. 19,801 17 Recreation Park 401 Sheldon St. 844,022 Southeast corner of Sycamore Ave. 18 ISvcamore Park and California St. 33,566 19 Teen Center and Skate Park 405 E. Grand Ave. 23,702 6214 Parks and loications Fa(,",l I I.A Imperial Hwy , Agreement No. 6214 Imperial Ave "walnut Ave Sycamore Ave 15 LO U (77) EL S E G U N D O DOG PARK ACACIA PARK INDEPENDENCE PARK CONSTITUTION PARK CANDY CANE PARK HOLLY VALLEY PARK id WASHINGTON PARK 4 ,CAMPUS EL SEGUNDO FREEDOM PARK HILLTOP PARK MEMORY ROW 112 1 t;;CAMP EUCALYPTUS CLUTTER'S PARK (641 CALIFORNIA ST) 2 Agreement No. 6214 N 14 KANSAS PARK 15, LIBRARY PARK 16 ,;THE PLUNGE 4 5 16� 17) RECREATION PARK Ql. 8 SYCAMORE PARK 19)' 1 TEEN CENTER 6? /,,,WISEBURN AQUATICS Agreement No. 6214 ACACOAAVE. Address: boo Block of W. Acacia Ave, West of Loma Vista Agreement No. 6214 Zoo Block of Whiting St, North of Binder PI. W. HOLLY AVE. Address: Corner of W. Holly Ave & Valley St.. Agreement No. 6214 Address: 22o1 E Mariposa Ave. I Agreement No. 6214 Agreement No. 6214 12 IMPERIAL AVE. Address: Imperial Ave, between HiIIcrest Ave & Center St. IMPERIAL AVE. Address: East Imperial Ave at Sheldon St. IMPERIAL AVE. Address: East Imperial Ave, between McCarthy Court & Sheldon St n Agreement o a214 IMPERIAL AVE. IMPERIAL AVE,. IMPERIAL AVE. Agreement No. 6214 Address: Washington St, between Walnut & Sycamore Ave. E. WALNUT AVE. FA E. SYCAMORE AVE.: io E . SYCAMORE AVE. Address: Washington St, between Sycamore & Maple Ave. E. MAPLE AVE. ii Agreement No. 6214 H Ln Z O F- 0 Z_ 2 Ul Q NORTH SIDE, E. MAPLE AVE, H Ln Z O H l7 Z_ 2 Ln Q 10.0 T H.. SID,E. E. PALM AVE. E. MARIPOSA AVE. Address: Washington St, between Maple & Mariposa Ave. E. PALM AVE. 12 AgreementNo: 6214 E. MARIPOSA AVE„ r_ Z O Ln Ln Address: Illinois St, between Mariposa & Holly Ave . E. HOLLY AVE., r r_ Z O Ln Ln 13 Agreement No. 6214 E GRAND AVE. Address: Corner of Maryland St & Grand Ave. 14 E. HOLLY AVE. Address: Corner of Kansas St & Holly Ave. 15 Agreement No. 6214 W. PALM AVE. 600 Block of Main St, between Palm & Mariposa Ave. 16 M�Umffim W. MARIPOSA AVE. Address: 219 W. Mariposa Ave, 17 E. PINE AVE. Agreement No. 6214 O 0 ft''i, / i l if l I r Address: 401 Sheldon St. 19 Agreement No. 6214 E. SYCAMORE AVE. Address: Corner of Sycamore Ave & California St, Agreement No. 6214 Address: 405 E. Grand Ave. 21 Agreement No. 6214 Address: 224o E. Grand Ave. 22 Agreement No. 6214 This page intentionally left blank, 23 6214 Agreement No. 6214 C11 �01 ELSEGUNDO August 17, 2021 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NO. ENG 21-13 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN ATTENTION RFP HOLDERS: The following additions, modifications, and clarifications to the specifications shall be included in, and become a part of, any contract which may be executed for the above project in the City of El Segundo: 1. The proposal due date and time is still Tuesday, August 31, at 4:00 pm 2. A list of the participants at the pre -proposal meeting is attached. 3. Please see the attached Supplement to Addendum 1 for questions and the responses to them. As evidence that the CONSULTANT has read this Addendum, the CONSULTANT must acknowledge same in the space provided below and submit this Addendum with the Proposal. Failure to provide such acknowledgement shall render the proposal as non- responsive and subject to rejection. Signature: Print Company Name: Page 1 of 1 Date: 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA 90245-3895 (310) 524-2300 Fax (310) 640-0489 Agreement No. 6214 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION RFP NO. ENG 21-13 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN PRE -PROPOSAL ZOOM MEETING PARTICIPANTS August 11, 2021. 10:00 AM NAME _ COMPANY CONTACT INFORMATION 1 Floriza Rivera City of El Segundo L Telephone: 310-524-2361 Email: frivera@elsegundo.org - 2 Jenny Grover - - - - - - - - - """""""""" ................................. Disability Access Consultants LLC 3 Brandon Guyton Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. 4 Bryon Scott Bureau Veritas 5 Jasper Kirsch Jensen Hughes 6 Kelly Hang Jensen Hughes 7 Steve Kuchin sky Onyx Architects 8 Brenda Nasio Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. 9 Mary Epstein Bureau Veritas 10 John Cruikshank JMCz Agreement No. 6214 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NO. ENG 21-13 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN ADDENDUM NO. 1 SUPPLEMENT DATE: August 17, 2021 TO: All Prospective Proposers The following clarifying information and answers to questions have been provided below. The information provided in this Addendum has been made available to all prospective proposers and shall be considered as incorporated into the specifications for the above -referenced project. All other portions of Contract Documents and previous Addenda not specifically mentioned in this Addendum remain in force. Question 1: Is the $150,000 the full amount of funding for all phases of the ADA Self - Evaluation and Transition Plan? Answer: The funding will primarily be for: 1. Surveying City public right-of-way and open areas for accessibility barriers 2. Reviewing existing accessibility data 3. Generating an ADA transition plan that combines all City accessibility data and determines a long-term schedule and cost estimates for the removal of accessibility barriers in City buildings, right-of-way, and open space in future years. Question 2: The Request for Proposal mentioned addressing items that weren't previously addressed. Have there been any changes in the way the City of El Segundo approaches ADA compliance? Answer: The City requirements do not differ from those already set by current ADA standards. An existing structure that may not have a Facility Condition Form applicable to it would be an example of an item that would need to be addressed (surveyed) at this time. The scope of work provides for that addition so that the final ADA transition plan will be complete in its information on City structures. Agreement No. 6214 Question 3: Due to Covid-19 restrictions, will the City of El Segundo consider an electronic submission only via email of the "...proposal and the fee proposal..." rather than "an electronic copy via digital media, an original and three (3) hardcopies of [the] proposal and the fee proposal in a separate sealed envelope" Answer: The City will accept an electronic submission of the proposal and fee proposal via email to ensure that the proposal is received by the deadline. Please place RFP ENG 21-13 in the subject line of the proposal email. Please place FEE PROPOSAL RFP ENG 21-13 in the subject line of the separate fee proposal email. However, three hardcopies of the proposal and a hardcopy of the fee proposal in a separate sealed envelope will still also be expected to arrive at City Hall within the same week. Please send or deliver the hardcopies to: F. Rivera Public Works Department El Segundo City Hall 350 Main St. El Segundo, CA 90245 310-524-2361 Question 4: How many curb ramps, pedestrian signals, and intersections are there to be surveyed? Answer: Curb ramps — approximately 972 potential and existing curb ramp locations. Pedestrian signals — approximately 23 signalized intersections. The City also has 7 public lighted crosswalks and 1 private lighted crosswalk (no traffic signal). Intersections — approximately 173 intersections. Question 5: How many miles of sidewalk are there to survey? Answer: The City has approximately 61.8 miles of streets. If sidewalks are present on both sides of the street, then there are approximately 124 miles of sidewalk to survey. Question 6: We are requesting the GIS Street Centerline Shapefiles as a "downloadable file" Answer: Facility Condition Assessments and GIS Street Centerline Shapefiles will be sent to any requestor. Agreement No. 6214 Question 7: During the August 11, 2021 Zoom conference pre -submittal meeting, we understand that the City of El Segundo has "a budget of $150,000 for this year" Is the $150,000 the full amount of funding for all phases of the ADA Self - Evaluation and Transition Plan? Or, is the $150,000 the initial funding of the project? And, if so, what is the focus of this initial scope of work that the $150,000 will fund?" Answer: The $150,000 funding will primarily be for: 1. Surveying City public right-of-way and open areas for accessibility barriers 2. Reviewing existing accessibility data 3. Generating an ADA transition plan that combines all City accessibility data and determines a long-term schedule and cost estimates for the removal of accessibility barriers in City buildings, right-of-way, and open space in future years.